Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,nvptx,0,"The code will fopen(omp_requires_file, <STR_LIT>)."
GCC,nvptx,1,"fprintf ( out , <STR_LIT> ) ; }

p = strstr ( p , needle ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,2,"</s>

else { ptx_name = NULL ; maybe_unlink ( ptx_name ) ; }"
GCC,nvptx,3,There is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement. It could potentially contain another if statement or any other code.
GCC,nvptx,4,The code will assign the value of heap to the variable "stmt" and then increment the value of heap by one.
GCC,nvptx,5,stmt->tokens = tokens ;
GCC,nvptx,6,The next statement would be: fork_wait();
GCC,nvptx,7,"</s>

obstack_ptr_grow(& argv_obstack, outlocation);"
GCC,nvptx,8,The next statement will be an else statement.
GCC,nvptx,9,"} Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

if (tok->kind == K_comment) {
    tok++;
}"
GCC,nvptx,10,">

The next statement could potentially be a closing curly brace that ends the ""if"" statement."
GCC,nvptx,11,None
GCC,nvptx,12,"The code will create a statement object using the allocated memory for a dot operation, with a start position at the current token and an end position <NUM_LIT> indices to the left."
GCC,nvptx,13,"fprintf ( out , ""%d %d\n"", nvars, nfuncs ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,14,"fprintf(out, ""Number of variables: %d, Number of functions: %d"", nvars, nfuncs);"
GCC,nvptx,15,The code is allocating memory for a character buffer and then reading data from a file stream into that buffer. It will continue to resize the buffer if necessary to ensure all data from the stream is read.
GCC,nvptx,16,next = stmt -> next ;
GCC,nvptx,17,The next statement is an if statement checking if the current token is a colon.
GCC,nvptx,18,"ptr is incremented multiple times, causing the loop to continue and the program to eventually break."
GCC,nvptx,19,"</s>

<debug> tool_cleanup( false );

// destroys tool if it exists and all states using it are released"
GCC,nvptx,20,"The statement predicts that the code snippet will end with a curly brace, indicating that the function 'tool_cleanup' has finished running."
GCC,nvptx,21,"} }

}"
GCC,nvptx,22,"c = bs + l ; }

if ( tok -> space ) fputc ( ' ' , out ) ; switch ( tok -> kind ) { case K_string : { const char * c = tok -> ptr + 2 ; size_t len = tok -> len - 2 ; fputs ( tok->ptr, out ) ; while ( len ) { const char * bs = ( const char * ) memchr ( c , '\\' , len ) ; size_t l = bs ? bs - c : len ; fprintf ( out , ""%.*s"" , ( int ) l , c ) ; len -= l ; c = bs"
GCC,nvptx,23,break;
GCC,nvptx,24,#NAME?
GCC,nvptx,25,"""if ( fopenmp == true ) printf ( <STR_LIT> , get_version ( ) ) ;"""
GCC,nvptx,26,The code will continue executing the default statement and put the current character in the output file.
GCC,nvptx,27,The next statement would be to check if the file or directory exists and has the appropriate permissions by using the access function.
GCC,nvptx,28,The next statement would be a call to the function "fork_execute" passing in the newly created "new_argv" array as an argument along with some other values.
GCC,nvptx,29,"The code snippet will free up a pointer at index i and then free the entire pointer, followed by a return statement."
GCC,nvptx,30,"unlink ( file ); } }</s>

""The function closes and unlinks the specified file if the variable 'save_temps' is false."""
GCC,nvptx,31,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will be the closing tag for tool_cleanup function, such as </tool_cleanup>."
GCC,nvptx,32,The next statement would be a null check for "nextval" before proceeding with the for loop.
GCC,nvptx,33,"<s> for ( comma = """", id = func_ids; id; comma = "","", id = id->next) fprintf(out, ""%s%s"", comma, id->ptx_name);"
GCC,nvptx,34,"buffer = XRESIZE ( buffer , char , alloc ) ; 

A loop will continue to read from the stream until <NUM_LIT> amount of characters have been read or the end of the stream has been reached, whichever comes first."
GCC,nvptx,35,The next statement will be "base += n;" which increments the variable "base" by the value of "n".
GCC,nvptx,36,"""End of program."""
GCC,nvptx,37,"The next statement could be to close the code block, such as with a closing curly brace ""}"" or to continue the code with another statement."
GCC,nvptx,38,"</s>


""else { putenv ( CONST_CAST ( char * , string ) ) ; }"""
GCC,nvptx,39,"""Execute the putenv function with the string as an argument."""
GCC,nvptx,40,"cpp_define_formatted ( parse_in , <STR_LIT> , minor )"
GCC,nvptx,41,The next statement is likely to define variables for the major and minor version numbers of PTX.
GCC,nvptx,42,"if ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) > UNITS_PER_WORD && split != BLKmode ) { push_hard_regno ( i , X <NUM_LIT> ) ; push_hard_regno ( i + <NUM_LIT> , split == Pmode ? DImode : <NUM_LIT> ) ; }
None"
GCC,nvptx,43,">


if (cfun->machine->red_partition && regno_reg_rtx[i] != const0_rtx && split_mode_p(mode)) {
	fprintf (file, ""%s"", nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode (mode, false));
	output_reg (file, i, split, 0);
	fprintf (file, "":%s"", nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode (mode, false));
}"
GCC,nvptx,44,"emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( tmp , gen_rtx_NE ( mode , dst , GEN_INT ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ) )"
GCC,nvptx,45,"The next statement of this code snippet could be another ""case"" statement for a different built-in operation, followed by the corresponding return statement."
GCC,nvptx,46,"}

At this point, the code is using a for loop to create a vector shuffle and assign it to the ""var"" variable."
GCC,nvptx,47,The next statement of this code snippet could potentially be a function call or definition for another memory barrier or a reduction operation using the "BAR_RED" prefix.
GCC,nvptx,48,">


The next statement could potentially be a variable initialization or assignment, or a function call."
GCC,nvptx,49,"The next statement is: diagnose_openacc_conflict ( TARGET_UNIFORM_GANG , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,50,If (replaced_dots) XDELETE (replaced_dots) ;
GCC,nvptx,51,s << "ptr_type_node" ;
GCC,nvptx,52,"'} else { printf ( %d , <VAR> ) ;'"
GCC,nvptx,53,"""Declaring a field has begun."""
GCC,nvptx,54,"if (TREE_CODE (type) != ARRAY_TYPE) { fprintf(file, <STR_LIT>, ""not an array""); assemble_name_raw(file, name); fputc('\n', file); }"
GCC,nvptx,55,<NUM_LIT>
GCC,nvptx,56,The next statement would be: "return ADDR_SPACE_GLOBAL;"
GCC,nvptx,57,"The next statement will likely be an ""else"" statement to handle the case where the condition is not met. For example:

else {
    return ADDR_SPACE_NORMAL;
}"
GCC,nvptx,58,"fprintf ( file, <STR_LIT>, DECL_SIZE( TREE_TYPE (exp) ) / BITS_PER_UNIT,DECL_ALIGN( TREE_TYPE (exp) ) / BITS_PER_UNIT * BITS_PER_UNIT);"
GCC,nvptx,59,"It cannot be accurately predicted as it depends on the values of the variables and the contents of the asm_out_file, which are not included in the given code snippet."
GCC,nvptx,60,"}

gcc_unreachable();"
GCC,nvptx,61,switch ( GET_MODE ( op ) ) { case cca_sint : } return true;
GCC,nvptx,62,"""If the size is greater than 32, print the section name and size in decimal format."""
GCC,nvptx,63,chunk_offset++;
GCC,nvptx,64,"<br>
It is likely that the program will go on to process or manipulate the ""args_so_far"" variable in some way, as it seems to be storing a set of arguments related to the call function."
GCC,nvptx,65,"} 

The code snippet will assemble the object name."
GCC,nvptx,66,"}

This code snippet does not contain any executable statements."
GCC,nvptx,67,"rtx delete

NULL"
GCC,nvptx,68,"} prediction: callee = gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , <VAR_LIT> )



rrtx declared_libfuncs_htab;"
GCC,nvptx,69,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of the code snippet as it depends on the values of ""func_decls"", ""asm_out_file"", and ""c_str()""."
GCC,nvptx,70,The next statement will likely involve manipulating or processing the current element (decl) in the hash table.
GCC,nvptx,71,fclose(asm_out_file);
GCC,nvptx,72,"fprintf ( asm_out_file , <STR_LIT> , GET_VALUE_AT_ADDRESS ( Paddr ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,73,There is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement. It will depend on the values of "named" and "mode".
GCC,nvptx,74,"else return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , 0 ) ;

```
This code snippet returns a register rtx if the mode is not VOIDmode and if the argument is named, otherwise it returns a rtx_REG with mode and 0 as arguments.
```"
GCC,nvptx,75,if ( mode == TImode ) cum->count += <NUM_LIT> ; else cum->count++ ;
GCC,nvptx,76,return BITS_PER_UNIT * <NUM_LIT> / 2;
GCC,nvptx,77,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,nvptx,78,"The code will return a specific value: a generated rtx UNSPEC value in the desired mode, with the number of arguments specified and an unspecified argument register."
GCC,nvptx,79,"return gen_rtx_CALL ( function_value_mode ( type ) , CALL_INSN_FUNCTION, gen_rtx_MEM ( Pmode, nvptx_ FUNCTION, gen_rtx_HIGH ( function_value_mode ( type ) , GEN_INT ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ) , outgoing ? gen_rtx_CONST_INT ( Pmode, <NUM_LIT> ) : const0_rtx )"
GCC,nvptx,80,"return gen_rtx_SET ( VOIDmode, gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ), <NUM_LIT> )"
GCC,nvptx,81,The next statement will be a closing curly brace to end the "else if" block.
GCC,nvptx,82,"}

The next statement would be to check if the mode is equal to the return register mode of the current function's machine. If it is, the function will return true, and if not, it will return false."
GCC,nvptx,83,The next statement would be "return mode == cfun -> machine -> ret_reg_mode ;"
GCC,nvptx,84,p->stack_frame_size = 0 ;
GCC,nvptx,85,"The next statement would most likely be a return statement, since the function is declared as returning an rtx variable."
GCC,nvptx,86,if (code == UNSPEC_FROM_GLOBAL) return UNSPEC_FROM_GLOBAL;
GCC,nvptx,87,"rtx new_op = gen_rtx_ADDR_SPACE ( as , op ) ; 

return new_op"
GCC,nvptx,88,"</s>

assert(init_machine_status == nvptx_init_machine_status)"
GCC,nvptx,89,"If result is not NULL_RTX, then the next statement is to return the string literal ""res""."
GCC,nvptx,90,There are no more statements to be predicted.
GCC,nvptx,91,"<


s> return mode;"
GCC,nvptx,92,"The next statement of this code snippet would be: 
while (size --> NUM_LIST) { nvptx_assemble_value(NUM_LIST, NUM_LIST); }"
GCC,nvptx,93,TRUE
GCC,nvptx,94,"case PRE_DEC: off = XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) ; fprintf (file, ""-%d"", off) ; }

fprintf (file, ""->"");

The next statement is likely to be another case statement, possibly for POST_INC or another operation related to memory addressing."
GCC,nvptx,95,"The next statement is case SYMBOL_REF : case LABEL_REF : output_addr_const ( file , x ) ; break ;"
GCC,nvptx,96,"<STR_LIT>

fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,97,return 0;
GCC,nvptx,98,"}

The next statement could be: ""return mode;""."
GCC,nvptx,99,'switch (mode) { case SFmode: mode = DFmode; default: mode = arg_promotion(mode); }'
GCC,nvptx,100,"return <STR_LIT> ; case DFmode : return <STR_LIT> ;

There may be additional statements following the last case statement."
GCC,nvptx,101,"if (force) {
  //do something
}

Possible next statement:
return true;"
GCC,nvptx,102,"decls_htab -> insert_to_hashtable ( name , decl ) ; }

The next statement could be a return statement or another conditional statement, depending on the outcome of the insertion."
GCC,nvptx,103,"</s>

There will likely be some code or statements inside the curly braces that will be executed."
GCC,nvptx,104,"</s>

No prediction possible without context!"
GCC,nvptx,105,"fprintf ( asm_out_file , ""<STR_LIT>"" , (TREE_CODE ( decl ) == VAR_DECL ? ""<STR_LIT>"" : ""<STR_LIT>"") , IDENTIFIER_POINTER ( DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME ( decl ) ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,106,"""Close the file for assembly output."""
GCC,nvptx,107,"if ( subreg_reg_adjust_mode_p ( new_reg , inner_mode , outer_mode , 

If the subreg_reg_adjust_mode_p function returns true for the new register, the current iteration of the for loop will be skipped and the next statement in the code will be executed."
GCC,nvptx,108,"The code will compute the number of registers in use and mode of operation for QImode, HImode, SImode, and DImode, before proceeding to extract instructions and get the attribute subregs. It will then check the mode precision and continue if it meets the conditions, otherwise it will perform a zero extension or truncate operation. Finally, it will validate the change and initialize the maximum number of registers and references."
GCC,nvptx,109,The next statement would be the end of the code snippet.
GCC,nvptx,110,"</s>

""<s> else { return false ; } </s>"""
GCC,nvptx,111,"""The function will return a string literal if the 'is_const' variable is true, and will otherwise return another string literal."""
GCC,nvptx,112,<ENDF>
GCC,nvptx,113,"return <STR_LIT> ;

return <STR_LIT> ;"
GCC,nvptx,114,"</s>

The next statement could be another if statement, or a statement that is executed if the condition is true."
GCC,nvptx,115,"if ( ! test ) {
    do_something();
} else {
    return null;
}"
GCC,nvptx,116,"""Otherwise, return NULL."""
GCC,nvptx,117,The next statement will most likely be a conditional statement or some sort of operation using the machine mode 'mode' variable. It is not possible to determine exactly what the next statement will be without additional context or knowledge of the specific program being executed.
GCC,nvptx,118,This code snippet returns the current mode if it is not a complex mode.
GCC,nvptx,119,"mode = arg_promotion ( Pmode ) ; if ( RETURN_IN_REG_P ( mode ) ) s << <STR_LIT> << nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode ( mode , false ) << <STR_LIT> ; }


s << <STR_LIT> << <STR_LIT> << name << <STR_LIT> ;"
GCC,nvptx,120,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
GCC,nvptx,121,"throw new Error ( arg

{

types ) ; } else if ( AGGREGATE_TYPE_P ( type ) ) { if ( args_from_decl ) { recurse ( NODE_ARG ) ; args_from_decl = false ; } else { throw new Error ( ""invalid aggregate type in argument list"" ) ; } } else if ( TREE_CODE ( type ) != FUNCTION_TYPE ) { auto & a = t.get_arguments ( ) ; tree rtype = TREE_TYPE ( type ) ; if ( rtype == return_type ||

""invalid aggregate type in argument list"""
GCC,nvptx,122,"</s>

This code snippet is incomplete or contains errors and no prediction can be made."
GCC,nvptx,123,s << IR_TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ) << <STR_LIT>;
GCC,nvptx,124,s << "void" << name << "(){";
GCC,nvptx,125,"s << nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode ( mode , false ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,126,else s
GCC,nvptx,127,return arg_promotion ( mode ) ;
GCC,nvptx,128,The next statement is "if ( not equal arg types and type is not aggregate ) { if ( current mode is SF ) mode = DF ; mode = promoted argument mode ; }"
GCC,nvptx,129,"This code snippet implies a conditional if statement of the form ""if (block is not visited)"". It suggests that if the block has not been previously visited, the ""visited"" flag will be unset or turned off."
GCC,nvptx,130,"The next statement would likely be something related to printing or writing data to the file, such as:

fwrite(file, &init_frag, sizeof(frag_t));"
GCC,nvptx,131,"fprintf (file, ""[%s]\n"" , name) ;"
GCC,nvptx,132,Write the declaration size unit of the current declaration to the file.
GCC,nvptx,133,"printf(""The size of the tree is %d"", tree size);"
GCC,nvptx,134,"'init_frag' is a variable

The value of 'init_frag.offset' will be checked and, if equal to 'init_frag.size', the function output_init_frag will be called with the argument 'NULL' as input."
GCC,nvptx,135,"fprintf(file, ""The function's prototype has been written to the stringstream."");"
GCC,nvptx,136,"}


""fprintf (file, <STR_LIT>, nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode(mode , true)); output_reg(file, i, split, -1);""`"
GCC,nvptx,137,"s

}

The next statement would likely be the closing bracket, indicating the end of the switch statement."
GCC,nvptx,138,The code will break the switch statement.
GCC,nvptx,139,"->


Assuming no other context, it is difficult to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. However, it is likely that the next statement would involve using the variable ""op"" in some way, such as assigning it to another variable or using it in an expression."
GCC,nvptx,140,The next statement would likely contain the closing bracket(s) for the if statement.
GCC,nvptx,141,The statement will set the symbol data area using the XEXP (expression) of the rtl with a specific value of <NUM_LIT> and the determined data area.
GCC,nvptx,142,"return nvptx_set_result_decl ( exp , target , result_decl ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,143,"The next statement will be ""emit_move_insn (varargs, stack_pointer_rtx);"""
GCC,nvptx,144,"return addr

""<s> return addr"""
GCC,nvptx,145,"This code snippet calculates the offset and size from a call expression and checks if the sum of offset and size is greater than a variable called worker_red_size. If it is, then worker_red_size is set to the sum of offset and size. Then, a variable called addr is initialized to a value stored in another variable called worker_red_sym. If the offset is not equal to 0, then addr is updated to be the sum of addr and offset and stored as a constant."
GCC,nvptx,146,End if statement.
GCC,nvptx,147,"}

End of function: ""nvptx_file_end"""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,nvptx,148,The code will enter the default case statement and reach the end of the switch block.
GCC,nvptx,149,"{
  if (named) {
    return AMD/ATI
  } else {
    return NVIDIA
  }
}

""The statement will return AMD/ATI if the variable 'named' is true, and NVIDIA if it is false."""
GCC,nvptx,150,cum->count--;
GCC,nvptx,151,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. It is also important to note that prediction is not the intended purpose of function declarations, and they are used to define the type and arguments of a function rather than to execute code."
GCC,nvptx,152,"The next statement will be:

return nvptx_libcall_value ( mode , NULL_RTX ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,153,"} }

The next statement could be another case or a default case in the switch statement, or it could be a closing curly brace to end the function. It could also be a return statement if the function is meant to return a value. It all depends on the code following this snippet."
GCC,nvptx,154,"rtx dest = nvptx_build_par

""return dest ;"""
GCC,nvptx,155,"}


res = get_insns(); end_sequence();"
GCC,nvptx,156,"</s>

The next statement is ""break ;"""
GCC,nvptx,157,There are no more statements to execute as the code snippet has reached the end of the function and will return the result of the nvptx_gen_shuffle function.
GCC,nvptx,158,"gen_rtx_CLOBBER (<NUM_LIT>, DATA_SET_PTR (data , res)) ; end_sequence ( ) ; }

// else if ( pm == PM_loud ) {
	// <DECL_EXPR>exception (*line - <> <NUM_LIT><>, gen_rtx_SET (<DECL_EXPR>reg, <DECL_EXPR>exception (*line - <> <NUM_LIT><>addr)));
// if ( <NUM_LIT> ) break ;
}"
GCC,nvptx,159,"tree addr = build2 ( ADDR_EXPR , type , fndecl , offset , size , align ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,160,"It is likely that there will be a ""break"" statement again, followed by another ""case"" statement."
GCC,nvptx,161,"In the next statement, the code will execute the default case."
GCC,nvptx,162,"<NUM_LIT>

 it adds the current statement to the gsi context"
GCC,nvptx,163,"The code snippet predicts the next statement after the code given is insert_init_stmt. This is because the code snippet creates a new edge, adds statements to the sequence, and then uses the gsi_prev function to move to the previous statement. Therefore, the next statement would be the insert_init_stmt."
GCC,nvptx,164,"This code snippet is setting up a reduction operation for the nvptx platform. It is checking the level of the reduction (GOMP_DIM_GANG or GOMP_DIM_WORKER), creating the necessary memory references, and generating the corresponding instructions for the reduction. The next statement would likely be either populating the result tree or pushing the appropriate reductions to the workers."
GCC,nvptx,165,"It is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks if the variable ""lhs"" exists, and if so, assigns it the value of ""var"". After this, the current gimplify context will be popped and the gimplified sequence will be replaced in the global statement iterator."
GCC,nvptx,166,The next statement would likely involve checking if the value of "level" is equal to GOMP_DIM_GANG and then performing some sort of assignment or operation based on that comparison.
GCC,nvptx,167,"}

warning_at ( decl ? DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION ( decl ) : UNKNOWN_LOCATION , <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , PTX_WORKER_LENGTH , dims [ GOMP_DIM_WORKER ] ) ; dims [ GOMP_DIM_WORKER ] = PTX_WORKER_LENGTH ;"
GCC,nvptx,168,"}</s>

fprintf (file, ""[%d] \""%s_%s\"" : -1;"", regno, name, name);"
GCC,nvptx,169,I am unable to predict the next statement without more context.
GCC,nvptx,170,"DEF ( GET_ADDR , <STR_LIT> , ( PTRVOID , ST , UINT , UINT , NULL_TREE ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,171,The code will return the value of gen_rtx_REG for the mode and NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM variables.
GCC,nvptx,172,"<s>

<c> if ( ! cfun -> machine -> doing_call ) return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ) ; return gen_reg_rtx ( mode ) ; </c>"
GCC,nvptx,173,"tree acc_out = make_ssa_name ( var_type ) ; tree update_expr = fold_build2 ( op , var_type , ref_in , var ) ; gimplify_assign ( acc_out , update_expr , & red_seq ) ; tree ref_out = build_simple_mem_ref ( ptr ) ; TREE_THIS_VOLATILE ( ref_out ) = <NUM_LIT> ; gimplify_assign ( ref_out , acc_out , & red_seq ) ; gsi_insert_seq_before ( gsi , red_seq , GSI_SAME_STMT ) ; Insert the sequence red_seq before the statement in the current statement iterator location (GSI), possibly at"
GCC,nvptx,174,Add a phi argument to the phi node created in the previous statement.
GCC,nvptx,175,"The next statement could be:

worker_red_size = GET_MODE_SIZE(SImode) / BITS_PER_UNIT;"
GCC,nvptx,176,"fprintf ( asm_out_file , ""%s%s"", ptx_type, ptx_type)"
GCC,nvptx,177,return "The sizes of the inner modes are not equal."
GCC,nvptx,178,"The code will return the result of passing in the parameters mode, type, and false into the function ""pass_in_memory."""
GCC,nvptx,179,"par -> inner_mask |= GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_WORKER ) ; }

The next statement would most likely be a return statement or the end of the code snippet."
GCC,nvptx,180,"The next statement would be: `if ( par -> mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_MAX ) ) nvptx_mpropagate (par -> forked_block, par -> forked_insn);`"
GCC,nvptx,181,"}

fs = fs - 1;"
GCC,nvptx,182,"(Sorry, there are too many variables and function calls to accurately predict the next statement!)"
GCC,nvptx,183,"""fwrite (asm_out_file, <STR_LIT>, TREE_PURPOSE(dims));"""
GCC,nvptx,184,The next statement of this code snippet is "delete pars".
GCC,nvptx,185,"}


<PRED> int i = LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + <NUM_LIT>;
<PRED> while (i < max_regs) {
<PRED>   if (REG_N_SETS(i) == <NUM_LIT> && REG_N_REFS(i) == <NUM_LIT>) {
<PRED>       regno_reg_rtx[i] = const0_rtx;
<PRED>   }
<PRED>   i++;
<PRED> }"
GCC,nvptx,186,"}

if the basic block ""target"" is not marked as visited, then the variable ""n"" will be reassigned using the function ""nvptx_sese_number"" with the input parameters ""n"", ""p"", ""dir"", ""target"", and ""list""."
GCC,nvptx,187,"The code snippet does not have a clear output, as it is missing important context. Assuming the missing context is provided and the snippet is part of a function, the next statement could be a variable or function return statement, or a line of code that performs other computations on the variable 'n'."
GCC,nvptx,188,sese -> sese -> pop()
GCC,nvptx,189,"prediction = pseudo_node_t(child,hi_child(t_sese->high.first<sup2</sup>*BB_GET_SESE(num)+t_hi))
sese->push(pseudo_node_t(child, dir))"
GCC,nvptx,190,"The program checks if there is a conditional branch and if the mask for vector dimension is not set, it sets the skip mask to a specific number. Otherwise, if there is a tail branch, the program returns. Next, the program declares an unsigned integer mode and an rtx_insn called before, and loops through the different modes. If the mode's mask matches the skip mask, the program creates a label and a predicate. If the mode is ""GOMP_DIM_VECTOR"", the program creates a true branch for the predicate to the label, otherwise it creates a true branch for the predicate to the label without unrolling. Then"
GCC,nvptx,191,"}

The code will check for a condition to decide which type of instruction to emit, either nvptx_gen_vcast or nvptx_gen_wcast. If the condition fails, it will emit a wcast instruction at the tail, followed by a wsync instruction, and a second wcast instruction at the tail."
GCC,nvptx,192,The next statement is: return;
GCC,nvptx,193,"The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the code block."
GCC,nvptx,194,"The next statement will likely contain an if statement, possibly checking the value of data.offset for a specific condition."
GCC,nvptx,195,"I'm sorry, I cannot accurately predict code snippets without seeing the context and variables involved. Can you provide more information?"
GCC,nvptx,196,"</s>

<STR_LIT> }"
GCC,nvptx,197,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the variables involved, but one possibility could be a semicolon to end the line of code, indicating the end of the statement. Another possibility could be a conditional statement, such as an if/else statement, to determine which statement to execute next based on certain conditions."
GCC,nvptx,198,"}
(data->ptr = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode));"
GCC,nvptx,199,return;
GCC,nvptx,200,"</s>

None, it is the end of the code snippet."
GCC,nvptx,201,"nvptx_assemble_decl_begin ( file , name , section_for_decl ( decl ) , TREE_TYPE ( decl ) , size ? tree_to_shwi ( size ) : <NUM_LIT> , DECL_ALIGN ( decl ) )"
GCC,nvptx,202,"fprintf(file, <STR_LIT>);"
GCC,nvptx,203,"if ( ! crtl -> struct_by_value_returns ) { if ( mode == Pmode || ( <VAR_DECL_LIT> && varargs_prototype_p ( ) ) ) continue ; } }

If the simulated register stack size is larger than 1, the compiler will print the stack size to the file."
GCC,nvptx,204,"}


if ( worker_black_size ) write_worker_buffer ( asm_out_file , worker_black_sym , worker_black_align , worker_black_size ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,205,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It is possible that the code snippet could continue onto the next line or there could be no more statements after this.
GCC,nvptx,206,There is not enough information to predict the next statement. It could be anything since the code snippet is incomplete.
GCC,nvptx,207,The next statement would be "res = get_insns(); end_sequence();"
GCC,nvptx,208,"The next statement will check if the value of dims at index GOMP_DIM_WORKER is greater than the value of PTX_WORKER_LENGTH, and if so, it will warn at the decl location (if it exists) or unknown location with a specified statement. It will then set the value of dims at GOMP_DIM_WORKER to PTX_WORKER_LENGTH and set changed to true."
GCC,nvptx,209,"The next statement would be:
warning_at ( decl ? DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION ( decl ) : UNKNOWN_LOCATION , <NUM_LIT> , dims [ GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ] ? G_ ( <STR_LIT> ) : G_ ( <STR_LIT> ) , PTX_VECTOR_LENGTH , dims [ GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ] ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,210,"The next statement could be:

diagnose_openacc_conflict ( TARGET_NVPTX_OPT , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,211,"""return """
GCC,nvptx,212,"<STR_LIT>

'machine' is defined in file cfun.c

UPDATE: This snippet is a part of a larger code, so it's difficult to predict the exact statement that will come next. It appears that the code is related to organizing and printing data, specifically around the use of machine registers and stack pointers. Based on the previous statements, it's possible that the next statement could involve further manipulation or output of data using the variables 'bits', 'regno', 'size', 'align', and 'reg_stack'. It's also worth noting that the presence of the 'else' statement and the use of brackets suggests"
GCC,nvptx,213,"emit_insn ( <NULL> )

emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( gen_rtx_SET ( pred , gen_rtx_NE ( BImode , idx , const0_rtx ) ) , fn ( tmp , PM_loop_end , fs , data ) ) )"
GCC,nvptx,214,"The next statement would likely be ""if ( pars ) { code_object = nvptx_parallel_generate_for ( pars ) ; } "", where ""code_object"" is some variable or object and ""nvptx_parallel_generate_for()"" is a function that generates code for a parallel loop based on the discovered parameters. This assumes that the variable ""pars"" is declared elsewhere and the code_object is an output object."
GCC,nvptx,215,"The next statement is likely another if statement or a function call related to processing or organizing parallel code for the NVIDIA PTX architecture, as the code snippet appears to be for a compiler targeting that architecture. It could also be a statement related to freeing registers."
GCC,nvptx,216,"}
The next statement will likely be a closing bracket to end the function."
GCC,nvptx,217,"<s>

sint32 thread_blocks"
GCC,nvptx,218,"init_softstack_frame(file, alignment, sz);"
GCC,nvptx,219,"cfun

->end_function();"
GCC,nvptx,220,The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be "return par;"
GCC,nvptx,221,"J ( length_mode , data -> <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , GEN_INT ( <NUM_LIT> ) );

start_sequence ( ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,222,The next statement will generate an IF statement.
GCC,nvptx,223,"split_block ( gsi_bb ( gsi ) , gimple_seq_last ( & seq ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,224,"gimple_seq inited_seq = NULL ; gimple_seq_add_stmt ( & inited_seq ,

The predicted next statement is:

gimple_seq_add_stmt(&inited_seq, seq);"
GCC,nvptx,225,The next statement could be part of an if statement that sets the value of flag_var_tracking to a numerical literal.
GCC,nvptx,226,"The statement could be:
emit_insn_before (nvptx_wbarrier (false), par -> forked_insn)"
GCC,nvptx,227,"</s>

emit_insn ( fn ( tmp , rw , fs , data ) )"
GCC,nvptx,228,"else if (rw & PM_modify) emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (ptr, gen_rtx_MEM (DImode, tmp)));"
GCC,nvptx,229,"The code snippet has reached the end of the for loop and is calling the function nvptx_neuter_pars with the parameters pars, mask, and <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,nvptx,230,"The next statement is: oacc_set_fn_attrib ( current_function_decl , attr ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,231,"static bool nvptx_vpropagate (bool is_call, basic_block block, rtx_insn * insn) { return nvptx_propagate (is_call, block, insn, PM_read_write, vprop_gen, <NUM_LIT>) ; }

Possible options:

1. <NUM_LIT> will be used as an argument in the function vprop_gen.
2. The function nvptx_propagate will be called with six arguments.
3. The function nvptx_vpropagate will return the value of the function nvptx_propagate.
4. The function nvptx_vpropagate has six"
GCC,nvptx,232,The next statement could be assigning a value to worker_bcast_sym and then emitting another instruction after init.
GCC,nvptx,233,"</s>

The next statement could be another case statement or a default statement within the switch statement that is not shown. It could also be the end of the switch statement or a curly brace to close the switch statement."
GCC,nvptx,234,"The next statement will be ""case NVPTX_BUILTIN_CMP_SWAP : case NVPTX_BUILTIN_CMP_SWAPLL : return nvptx_expand_cmp_swap ( exp , target , mode , ignore ) ;"""
GCC,nvptx,235,"""for (ix = NUM_LIT; ix < len; ix++)"""
GCC,nvptx,236,It's impossible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
GCC,nvptx,237,"None, the code will not continue as there is a return function in the IF statement."
GCC,nvptx,238,"bbsese (unsigned node_, unsigned p, int dir_) : node(node_), parent(p), dir(dir_) { // Body }"
GCC,nvptx,239,"This code creates a new instance of the bb_sese class with the given parameters: node, parent, and dir."
GCC,nvptx,240,"</s>

<br>

A list of variables' values is defined within the node's body."
GCC,nvptx,241,return back
GCC,nvptx,242,"return res ; 

The next statement would be to return the value of the variable ""res""."
GCC,nvptx,243,"The next statement is likely an error checking statement using the gcc_assert function, ensuring that the value of variable ""first"" is less than or equal to the value of variable ""res""."
GCC,nvptx,244,"return NULL ;

The next statement will be ""default: return NULL;"""
GCC,nvptx,245,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict the next statement as it is dependent on the specific values passed to the function."
GCC,nvptx,246,"""return true;"""
GCC,nvptx,247,<s> else return true;
GCC,nvptx,248,"new statement:
The statement inside the FOR_ALL_BB_FN loop will be executed for each basic block in the current function."
GCC,nvptx,249,"}

BB_REMOVE_VISITED(flag);"
GCC,nvptx,250,"worklist.safe_push(insn_bb_t(insn, block));"
GCC,nvptx,251,"<s> auto block_seen = map -> get_or_insert ( block );
         if (block_seen) worklist.safe_push ( insn_bb_t ( insn , block ) );
         seen_insn = true;"
GCC,nvptx,252,"}

 insert_insn_on_edge ( inits , e ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,253,"}

The next statement would be: 
<s> if ( have_false && have_true ) done = true ;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,nvptx,254,"if ( sese -> node < sese -> node + dir && ! ( dir < <NUM_LIT> && sese -> parent == sese -> node ) ) sese -> push ( pseudo_node_t ( sese -> node , usd * <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; 

The next statement will likely be related to the if statement that checks if bb_sese * t_sese = BB_GET_SESE ( target ). It will probably be another if statement or a statement within the if block."
GCC,nvptx,255,"Some possible next statements could be:

- Define the string variable 'sep' and assign it a value
- Use the 'sep' variable in a function or operation
- Change the value of 'sep' to a different string
- Print or access the value of 'sep' in some way"
GCC,nvptx,256,"}

The code will create a comment string using the format specified by the three input variables, ASM_COMMENT_START, sep, and s. The output will be stored in the char pointer 'comment'."
GCC,nvptx,257,color = color_counts.get_next();
GCC,nvptx,258,"} color_counts [ -1 <name> length }}

The code will obtain the last value in the ""color_counts"" vector at the index of ""length"" and assign it to the variable ""color_counts""."
GCC,nvptx,259,"</s>

The next statement will likely involve allocating another register in the ""replacement"" list."
GCC,nvptx,260,"</s>

Possible next statements could include continuing the code with more if/else statements, calling a function, declaring a variable, or ending the block with a closing bracket. It is difficult to accurately predict the exact next statement without more context or knowledge of the specific program the code snippet is a part of."
GCC,nvptx,261,"}</s>


The next statement is likely to be the end of the function, denoted by a closing curly brace."
GCC,nvptx,262,"if(partition_level > 0) {
  // Code to handle partitioned function
} else {
  // Code to handle non-partitioned function
}"
GCC,nvptx,263,cfun -> machine -> axis_dim [ MACH_VECTOR_LENGTH ] = oa . vector_length ; cfun -> machine -> thread_coord [ MACH_VECTOR_LENGTH ] = max_workers;
GCC,nvptx,264,else if ( oa . num_workers == <NUM_LIT> ) max_workers = PTX_CTA_SIZE ;
GCC,nvptx,265,"</s>

'fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , sizeof(align) , reg_names [ regno ] ) ;'"
GCC,nvptx,266,"""Iterate through the reg_names array to print the regno value and the POINTER_SIZE."""
GCC,nvptx,267,"fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC <STR_LIT> , bits , reg_frame , reg_sspprev , size ) ; if ( alignment > keep_align ) fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , bits , reg_frame , reg_frame , - alignment ) ; size = crtl -> outgoing_args_size ; gcc_assert ( size % keep_align == <NUM_LIT> ) ; fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC <STR_LIT> , bits , reg_stack , reg_frame , size ) ; if ( ! crtl -> is_leaf"
GCC,nvptx,268,"<s> if get_inner_product < 10

if get_inner_product > 10"
GCC,nvptx,269,"<ul>
<li>The next statement could be a function call to determine the inner mode of the <code>mode</code> variable.</li>
<li>It could also be a conditional statement to check if the <code>mode</code> is complex. </li>
<li>If neither of these options occur, the code snippet may end and the program will continue to the next line outside of this snippet.</li>
</ul>"
GCC,nvptx,270,"""return true;"""
GCC,nvptx,271,The next statement would be evaluating the condition after the "if" statement.
GCC,nvptx,272,"fprintf ( file , ""DOC_DECL variable type = %s\n"", TYPE_NAME ( type ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,273,"The next statement might be to close the file or continue with assembling the declaration using the specified name, type, and object size."
GCC,nvptx,274,"return ; }

If the TREE_CODE of the name is not FUNCTION_DECL, an error will be reported at the source location of the name and the TREE_ASM_WRITTEN will be set to a numeric value."
GCC,nvptx,275,"The next statement will likely involve writing some code to define the output for the NVPTX assembly. The function being called on line 11, NVPTX_ASM_OUTPUT_DEF, likely takes in a stream and two identifiers, one pointing to the location of the assembly name and the other pointing to its value."
GCC,nvptx,276,init_frag.new = true
GCC,nvptx,277,init_frag . size = elt_size ; init_frag . mask = ( ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) <NUM_LIT> << ( elt_size * BITS_PER_UNIT - <NUM_LIT> ) ) - <NUM_LIT> + 1 ;
GCC,nvptx,278,"The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, marking the end of the ""nvptx_assemble_decl_end"" function."
GCC,nvptx,279,The next statement will be "init_frag.val = val; output_init_frag(x);"
GCC,nvptx,280,"printf(""The size of the declaration is %d"", size);"
GCC,nvptx,281,init_frag.offset = 0
GCC,nvptx,282,"}

val >>= (part * BITS_PER_UNIT) ;"
GCC,nvptx,283,"nvptx_builtin_decl(code+1, ARG_UNUSED(initialize_p));"
GCC,nvptx,284,"The next statement could be:
cfun -> machine -> add_varadic_arg(arg);"
GCC,nvptx,285,The code is checking if the call instruction in the given instruction is a syscall or not.
GCC,nvptx,286,This code snippet is likely a switch statement that checks for different cases and returns a boolean value based on the case that is matched. The next statement might be another case or a closing brace to end the switch statement.
GCC,nvptx,287,"None, as the snippet already ends with a return statement and does not contain any conditional logic."
GCC,nvptx,288,"}

Machine mode cannot change its class."
GCC,nvptx,289,The next statement may return NULL_RTX.
GCC,nvptx,290,"It looks like the code is checking the size of a type and returning the bit size of TImode if it's equal to the TYPE_SIZE_UNIT of the type. If it's not equal, it will return the value of basic_align."
GCC,nvptx,291,"fprintf (file, ""<STR_LIT>"", (type == error_mark_node ? ""<STR_LIT>"" : DECL_DEBUG_EXPR(decl) ? ""<STR_LIT>"" : DECL_EXTERNAL(decl) ? ""<STR_LIT>"" : obj_size));"
GCC,nvptx,292,"fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , ( TREE_CHAIN ( decl ) ? <STR_LIT> : TREE_CHAIN ( type ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,293,It is not possible to determine the next statement without context.
GCC,nvptx,294,"</s>

```
""Dump the parameters of par to the dump file."""
GCC,nvptx,295,This statement is checking the length of a list and comparing it to a numerical value using a function called "gcc_assert".
GCC,nvptx,296,gcc_assert ( pre_insn != BB_HEAD ( pre_block ) ) ; gcc_assert ( recog_memoized ( pre_insn ) == expected ) ; return pre_insn ;
GCC,nvptx,297,end of code snippet
GCC,nvptx,298,"""Finish execution and return to the main program."""
GCC,nvptx,299,"} 

if ( op ) {nextStatement;}"
GCC,nvptx,300,"</s>

<s> The mask has been updated with the combined values of GOMP_DIM_MASK with arguments GOMP_DIM_WORKER and GOMP_DIM_VECTOR. </s>"
GCC,nvptx,301,"This code snippet will set the symbol data area to either DATA_AREA_CONST or DATA_AREA_GLOBAL, depending on the value of TREE_READONLY in decl."
GCC,nvptx,302,"</s>

None ;"
GCC,nvptx,303,<s> return cfun->rail ;
GCC,nvptx,304,The next statement will be a switch statement with the default case executing a call to the gcc_unreachable() function.
GCC,nvptx,305,"while 
the next case or a break statement"
GCC,nvptx,306,"The next statement could be either a conditional statement or a loop statement, as there are multiple possibilities for the value of ""varargs"". A possible conditional statement could be:

if (varargs) {
    XVECEXP (pat, <NUM_LIT>, vec_pos++) = gen_rtx_USE (VOIDmode, varargs);
}

A possible loop statement could be:

for (int i = 0; i < vec_pos; i++) {
    // do something with XVECEXP (pat, <NUM_LIT>, i)
}"
GCC,nvptx,307,"pat = expand_expr ( CALL_EXPR_ARG ( exp , <NUM_LIT> ), NULL_RTX, mode, EXPAND_NORMAL);"
GCC,nvptx,308,"return gen_rtx_fmt_ee (SET_TYPE (compare), BImode, cmp, pred);"
GCC,nvptx,309,The next statement will most likely be a function call to emit the generated instruction for the compare operation.
GCC,nvptx,310,The next statement would likely be related to the forking process mentioned in the current statement. It could be a call to a function or a conditional statement.
GCC,nvptx,311,"}</s>

The next statement is likely to be the closing curly brace ""}""."
GCC,nvptx,312,"</s>

nvptx_barrier_wait (GOMP_BARRIER_HARDWARE) ;"
GCC,nvptx,313,"return src ; }</s>

The next statement could be a check for the machine mode and returning the appropriate value."
GCC,nvptx,314,"if ( ! REG_P ( op ) && GET_CODE ( op ) != CONST_INT ) op = copy_to_mode_reg ( SImode , op ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,315,"fputs ( <STR_LIT> , asm_out_file ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,316,"fprintf (asm_out_file, <STR_LIT>, GET_MODE_SIZE(SImode));"
GCC,nvptx,317,The next statement will likely involve an assertion check or another function call.
GCC,nvptx,318,"} }

The next statement is ""unsigned count ;"""
GCC,nvptx,319,<c> Arg registers are stored in the "cumulative_args_t" structure.
GCC,nvptx,320,"cum_v needs to be a variable that can be passed into the function get_cumulative_args, which will then set the value of cum to a pointer to a CUMULATIVE_ARGS object."
GCC,nvptx,321,"This code snippet does not provide enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It begins by defining a function called ""nvptx_function_arg_advance"" with two parameters, but it does not provide any additional code or instructions."
GCC,nvptx,322,return GET_MODE_SIZE(mode);
GCC,nvptx,323,"}

The function will return the alignment of the given machine mode."
GCC,nvptx,324,<s> printf ( "File printed successfully." ) ;
GCC,nvptx,325,return cum->args[i];
GCC,nvptx,326,The next statement would be to return a value of NULL_RTX.
GCC,nvptx,327,There is not enough information to make a valid prediction.
GCC,nvptx,328,"</s

    return true;"
GCC,nvptx,329,It is impossible to predict the next statement without further context.
GCC,nvptx,330,"if(regno >= 0) {
    return regno == NVPTX_SHARED_REGNUM ;
}

""The next statement could be a check to see if 'regno' is greater than or equal to 0 and if it is, then it will return 'regno == NVPTX_SHARED_REGNUM'."""
GCC,nvptx,331,"}</s>
 I'm sorry, I cannot predict what the next statement would be based on this code snippet alone. Additional context and code would be needed in order to make a prediction."
GCC,nvptx,332,"fold_build1 ( code , dest_type , expr )"
GCC,nvptx,333,"</s>

The next statement would be a line of code starting with ""case"" and specifying a particular mode."
GCC,nvptx,334,The next statement will be "break;"
GCC,nvptx,335,"</s>
The next statement is a switch statement checking the mode of the source register."
GCC,nvptx,336,"}

Possible output


else return NULL;"
GCC,nvptx,337,"}

NULL_RTX"
GCC,nvptx,338,"The next statement could be calculating the number of bytes needed to align the tree, by dividing the mode's alignment (in bits) by the number of bits per unit."
GCC,nvptx,339,"</s>


""Return the value of 'master' or, if 'master' is not defined, assign a new value using the function 'gen_reg_rtx' of mode 'SImode'."""
GCC,nvptx,340,"<e>

The code will assign a new SImode register to the master variable if master is currently null, and then return the master variable."
GCC,nvptx,341,"If pred is not null, then pred will be returned. Otherwise, pred will be assigned the result of calling gen_reg_rtx with BImode as an argument."
GCC,nvptx,342,"</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""nvptx_globalize_label"" that takes two parameters: a pointer to a FILE object and a pointer to a string."
GCC,nvptx,343,"*
The next statement is not predictable without seeing the complete code snippet."
GCC,nvptx,344,"If the code compiles correctly, the next statement could be a closing bracket to end the function."
GCC,nvptx,345,The code will return the variable "decl" with the new attribute added.
GCC,nvptx,346,"statement

The next statement will possibly involve altering the attributes of the ""decl"" tree."
GCC,nvptx,347,"The next statement is bool existed = gang_private_shared_hmap . put ( var , offset ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,348,return true;
GCC,nvptx,349,"The next statement will be a switch case statement, where the current case is checked against the possible cases of IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_FINI, IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_TEARDOWN, and a default case where an error message is thrown."
GCC,nvptx,350,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could be another case statement or the end of the code snippet.
GCC,nvptx,351,"if ( <NUM_LIT> != & null )

The next statement would be ""return var;"""
GCC,nvptx,352,"<NUM_LIT> other_var = make_ssa_name ( TREE_TYPE ( accum ) ) ; nvptx_generate_vector_shuffle ( gimple_location ( <ENUM_LIT> ) , other_var , accum , <NUM_LIT> , & seq ) ; r = make_ssa_name ( TREE_TYPE ( accum ) ) ; gimplify_assign ( r , <OP_LIT> <NUM_LIT> }

var = r ;"
GCC,nvptx,353,"set_immediate_dominator(CDI_DOMINATORS, dst_bb, call_bb);"
GCC,nvptx,354,"""GOMP_DIM_VECTOR and oa->vector_length is set to PTX_WARP_SIZE if level is equal to 0, otherwise the statement is NULL."""
GCC,nvptx,355,"if (rhs) gimplify_assign (rhs, var, &seq);"
GCC,nvptx,356,Create a tree node for the current statement.
GCC,nvptx,357,"For each index 'i' and the respective value of 'old_dims', the statement at line <NUM_LIT> is ""old_dims[i] = dims[i]""."
GCC,nvptx,358,"}

The next statement of this code snippet will be: const char * worker_reason = NULL ;"
GCC,nvptx,359,"error(""Declaration type is not void. Cannot add attributes."", name);"
GCC,nvptx,360,"<s>

The code checks if the declaration of the node is not a variable declaration, and if not, an error is thrown with the name given. However, if the declaration is a public or static variable, then no additional attributes are added."
GCC,nvptx,361,return 1;
GCC,nvptx,362,This function will return an unsigned integer value corresponding to the number of registers on the NVIDIA PTX platform.
GCC,nvptx,363,The code will assert that the value of vector_red_partition multiplied by the maximum number of workers allowed by nvptx_mach_max_workers() is smaller than or equal to the value of vector_red_size.
GCC,nvptx,364,Data size in bytes: next
GCC,nvptx,365,"DEF ( END , <STR_LIT> , ( UINT , UINT , UINT , UINT , UINT ) ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,366,"return null

null"
GCC,nvptx,367,"<p>

The next statement is ""return_mode = VOIDmode ;"""
GCC,nvptx,368,"An assertion will be made to ensure that the value of ""oacc_bcast_partition"" multiplied by the maximum number of workers for the ""nvptx_mach_max_workers"" is less than or equal to the value of ""oacc_bcast_size"". If this assertion is not true, an error may be thrown."
GCC,nvptx,369,"""<s> fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> ), pred );"
GCC,nvptx,370,"break ; }


Break."
GCC,nvptx,371,"This code snippet appears to be from a switch statement, so the next statement could be one of the cases or a default return."
GCC,nvptx,372,"The next statement is likely to be an ""else"" statement, or a statement that follows the ""if"" statement, indicating what should be done if the condition is not met."
GCC,nvptx,373,if ( fn_class == function_sincos ) { if ( type != NULL_TREE ) return type == float_type_node || type == double_type_node; else return false; }
GCC,nvptx,374,"}

If none of the conditions are met, the function will return false."
GCC,nvptx,375,"else if ( nvptx_experimental && mode == SFmode && TARGET_SM53 ) else return false ;

The next statement would likely be ""return false;"""
GCC,nvptx,376,"lock_loop -> latch = update_bb 

Initialize and assign the loop structure * lock_loop to allocate its allocated header and latch to lock_bb."
GCC,nvptx,377,"* gsi_stmt(*gsi) = gimple_build_call(fndecl, <argument>, <argument>);"
GCC,nvptx,378,"build_cond_stmt (cond, latch_end)"
GCC,nvptx,379,"</s>


return -1;"
GCC,nvptx,380,Not enough information to make a valid prediction.
GCC,nvptx,381,"}None

None"
GCC,nvptx,382,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. It is possible that the code snippet ends with this statement, or that there are additional statements after this one."
GCC,nvptx,383,"predict tree


There is no way to accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the implementation and context of the code snippet. It could potentially be any code related to recording a needed function declaration."
GCC,nvptx,384,"Next, we can use the subrtx_iterator to iterate through the MEM address array to access the specific element at the given <NUM_LIT> index."
GCC,nvptx,385,"return SYMBOL_DATA_AREA ( const_rtx<a386> )

}

This code snippet is defining a function that takes in a const_rtx variable and first checks to make sure that its code is ""MEM"". Then, it sets a new const_rtx variable called ""addr"" which is the second expression in the original const_rtx variable (x). It then uses a subrtx_iterator to iterate through the sub-expressions of ""addr"" and checks if each one is a symbol reference. If it is, it returns the data area of that symbol. If no symbol references were found, it returns the data area of const_r"
GCC,nvptx,386,The next statement may be an 'if' statement that checks if the program is targeting a soft stack.
GCC,nvptx,387,"}

<NVPTX_data_area_area = nvptx_mem_data_area( x ).


<nvptx_curoc mem = NULL;"
GCC,nvptx,388,"The next statement is likely to be a boolean comparison operation, such as ""if (area == DATA_AREA_SHARED || area == DATA_AREA_GENERIC) {...}"" or ""while (area == DATA_AREA_SHARED || area == DATA_AREA_GENERIC) {...}""."
GCC,nvptx,389,"<s> if (!found) {
  return true;
}"
GCC,nvptx,390,The next statement would likely be another "if" statement or a "return" statement.
GCC,nvptx,391,"if ( strcmp ( name , <STR_LIT> ) == <NUM_LIT> ) return <STR_LIT> ;"
GCC,nvptx,392,"If statement (worker) is true, execute the following code on the next iteration of the loop."
GCC,nvptx,393,<s> bool cluster = mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_CLUSTER ) ;
GCC,nvptx,394,"if ( skip_mask ) { 
    bb_pair_vec_t regions; 
    nvptx_find_sese(par -> parent -> blocks, regions); 
} else { 
    neuter_mask = 0; 
    ix = escope; 
    while (ix < len) { 
        gcov_type region_peak = par -> stmt -> tos_len;
        unsigned region_ix = htab_find_slot(region_peak, &regions);
        __builtin_prefetch(regions[region_ix].first); ix++;
    } 
}"
GCC,nvptx,395,"The code will continue with a conditional statement checking if a dump file is present. If it is, the values of variables inner and par will be printed to the dump file."
GCC,nvptx,396,Par->inner = join->inner; inner->inner = NULL;
GCC,nvptx,397,">

The next statement is: if ( nvptx_optimize < <NUM_LIT> ) nvptx_optimize = optimize > <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,nvptx,398,"diagnose_openacc_conflict ( TARGET_ARB_DATA , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,399,"""write_var_marker(file, false, false, name);"""
GCC,nvptx,400,"nvptx_output_control_flow_insn(&operands[neg_pos], int_val(operands[cond_pos]), false);"
GCC,nvptx,401,"The next statement would be ""if (pre_p || post_p) break; return;"", as it is part of the ""case MEMMODEL_ACQ_REL"", ""case MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST"", and ""case MEMMODEL_SYNC_SEQ_CST""."
GCC,nvptx,402,"}

<98> if ( func == &br_sum)"
GCC,nvptx,403,"""var asm_out_file = [CONCAT:String]var output [CONCAT:String] [CONCAT:String] fnt procs [CONCAT:String]varhawkV10 [CONCAT:String]erre fs"""
GCC,nvptx,404,"$

return_code = ""<STR_LIT>"""
GCC,nvptx,405,I cannot make a valid prediction as the code snippet is incomplete and lacks context.
GCC,nvptx,406,return <STR_LIT>;
GCC,nvptx,407,"""If the mode is not VOIDmode, the program will print the specified format to the asm_out_file using the nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode function and the NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM variable, and then return the specified string."""
GCC,nvptx,408,"return nvptx_softstack:: }

"" else {return nullptr}"""
GCC,nvptx,409,This code snippet likely calls a function named "nvptx_output_softstack_switch" with several arguments and expects it to output some kind of assembly code. The next statement in this scenario would depend on the specific implementation of the function being called.
GCC,nvptx,410,It will return the <STR_LIT> string.
GCC,nvptx,411,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code.
GCC,nvptx,412,"} }</s>

This code snippet is determining if a remaining fragment is smaller than the initial fragment and if so, it will go through a loop to output the remaining fragments. The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace marking the end of the if statement and while loop."
GCC,nvptx,413,The code will use the nvptx_output_set_softstack function to set the stack pointer register number after checking that the current function machine has a softstack.
GCC,nvptx,414,"if (arg.passed_by_reference) {
    return true;
} else {
    return false;
}

}"
GCC,nvptx,415,pat = PATTERN ( insn ) ;
GCC,nvptx,416,"""pat"" is NULL_RTX if it is not a PARALLEL or SET instruction"
GCC,nvptx,417,"return SIGN

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and contents of the variables within the code snippet."
GCC,nvptx,418,The next statement will be a break statement that ends the switch block.
GCC,nvptx,419,"}

This code is checking for various cases of x_code and printing a corresponding statement to the file. The next statement is likely going to be another case that checks for a different type of x_code or a break statement to end the switch statement."
GCC,nvptx,420,"break ; case UNGE : // ' 

""mode = GET_MODE ( XEXP ( x , 1 ) ) ; switch ( x_code ) { 
case GEU : fputs ( <STR_LIT> , file ) ; 
break ; 
case LTGT : fputs ( <STR_LIT> , file ) ; 
break ; 
case UNEQ : fputs ( <STR_LIT> , file ) ; 
break ; 
case UNGE : // '"
GCC,nvptx,421,The code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context.
GCC,nvptx,422,"<//s>

This code snippet does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It appears to be a function call, but without knowing the definition of the function or the values of the parameters, it is impossible to predict the next statement. It could be anything from another function call to a return statement, depending on the context."
GCC,nvptx,423,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the context in which this code snippet is being used. It could be followed by an if statement, another return statement, or a variable assignment, among other possibilities."
GCC,nvptx,424,The next statement could be a conditional statement or a return statement that returns the boolean value of whether c is equal to '.' or '#'.
GCC,nvptx,425,"}

The next statement could be an if statement that executes code based on whether <c><s>no_prop_p</c></s> or <c>empty_loop_p</c> is true."
GCC,nvptx,426,"</s>



return mode;"
GCC,nvptx,427,"()</s

Based on the provided code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will involve executing a function called ""promote_arg"" with the parameters ""mode"" and ""for_return || ! type || TYPE_ARG_TYPES ( funtype )"". The statement may also involve returning a value."
GCC,nvptx,428,"}</s>


if (iterator)"
GCC,nvptx,429,"case E_TImode : return <STR_LIT> ; case E_OImode : return <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement would likely be ""default: return <STR_LIT> ;"" or another case statement for a different mode."
GCC,nvptx,430,"The next statement could potentially be a break statement to exit the switch case, or it could be another case statement for a different mode. It is unclear based on the provided information."
GCC,nvptx,431,"<s>

else {
    // do something else
}"
GCC,nvptx,432,"printf(""Function name: %s"", name);"
GCC,nvptx,433,return 1;
GCC,nvptx,434,"if (slot != NULL) { needed_fndecls_htab->insert(slot, decl); }"
GCC,nvptx,435,"}

tree * slot = actual_fndecls_htab -> find_slot ( decl , INSERT )

 
This code snippet creates a tree pointer ""slot"" and sets it equal to the result of calling the ""find_slot"" function on the ""actual_fndecls_htab"" table, passing in ""decl"" and INSERT as parameters."
GCC,nvptx,436,"""return 0;"""
GCC,nvptx,437,"""<STR_LIT> } break ; default : """
GCC,nvptx,438,"If the size is equal to the size of either the unsigned_type_node or long_long_unsigned_type_node, then the code will return the result of the nvptx_lockless_update function with the specified parameters."
GCC,nvptx,439,The next statement will likely be related to reorganizing and preventing branch interruptions.
GCC,nvptx,440,"""nvptx_reorg_subreg() function will be called"""
GCC,nvptx,441,"if ( <NUM_LIT> == NON-DEBUG_INSN_P(insn)</s>

The next statement will check if the current instruction is a non-debug instruction, or if the number of operands in the current instruction is equal to the specified number, or if the pattern of the current instruction is either USE or CLOBBER. If one of these conditions is met, the loop will continue and the next instruction will be processed. Otherwise, the number of in-use registers for each register type will be set to the specified number."
GCC,nvptx,442,"There will be a conditional statement that checks if the variable ""pred"" is equal to NULL_RTX, and if it is, sets ""pred"" to a new value using the function nvptx_get_unisimt_outside_simt_predicate(). After that, there will be a loop that iterates through the next instructions and calls the function predicate_insn() on each instruction, passing in the variable ""pred"" as an argument."
GCC,nvptx,443,"""The for loop will continue until i is no longer less than the length of p, and if the character at index i in p is equal to a period, it will be replaced with a dollar sign. The new p will be returned."""
GCC,nvptx,444,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be an if statement or a return statement that checks for a specific condition or returns a value. It may also include additional code or function calls.
GCC,nvptx,445,"If the conditions for the previous statement are not met, the next statement will check if the default scalar mode is supported for the specified mode."
GCC,nvptx,446,}
GCC,nvptx,447,edges->quick_push(b);
GCC,nvptx,448,"<INDENT>


<i> some operations will be performed on each edge in the list"
GCC,nvptx,449,"child = nullptr ; hi_child = pseudo_node_t ( )

sese->high = hi_child + <NUM_LIT>;"
GCC,nvptx,450,error: unexpected token 'vector_red_partition'
GCC,nvptx,451,"The next statement of this code snippet is:
 oacc_bcast_offset = MAX(oacc_bcast_offset, psize * (pnum - 1));"
GCC,nvptx,452,"The next statement is: ""rtx gen_rtx_SET ( data . base , bcast_sym );"""
GCC,nvptx,453,"}

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,nvptx,454,"The next statement could potentially be a return statement that uses the variable PTX_WARP_SIZE, or it could be a variable declaration or function call. Without the full context of the code, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,nvptx,455,Call the function extract_insn (tail).
GCC,nvptx,456,"The next statement would likely be:

printf(""Execution completed successfully."");"
GCC,nvptx,457,tail->next = NULL;
GCC,nvptx,458,"The next statement would be ""worklist.safe_push (insn_bb_t (insn, block))"" because ""else map -> get_or_insert (block) = insn;"" sets the value of ""block"" to ""insn""."
GCC,nvptx,459,"} }}

The worklist will push the basic block address (insn_bb_t) of the next instruction into the map at the end of each basic block, unless that block contains a return or join instruction."
GCC,nvptx,460,The next statement could be an if statement that checks if the "fntype" attribute of "cum" is equal to NULL_TREE or if "cum" is a variadic function (indicated by the "stdarg_p" function).
GCC,nvptx,461,The next statement is: }
GCC,nvptx,462,return true;
GCC,nvptx,463,The next statement is likely to be the end curly brace "}".
GCC,nvptx,464,"emit_insn_after ( nvptx_load_reg_plus ( GET_MODE ( reg ) , reg , master , const0 ) , insn ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,465,"}
The function will return the value false."
GCC,nvptx,466,return false;
GCC,nvptx,467,"The next statement will return the variable 'align', which will be the maximum value between the current value of 'align' and the alignment of the mode of the given type."
GCC,nvptx,468,The next statement will be "return align;".
GCC,nvptx,469,"""returning the result of nvptx_propagate with the given parameters"""
GCC,nvptx,470,It is likely that the next statement will involve determining the result or output of the function call "nvptx_propagate" with the given parameters.
GCC,nvptx,471,"}

8

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,nvptx,472,"}

5"
GCC,nvptx,473,"else {
    fprintf(asm_out_file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, val);
}"
GCC,nvptx,474,"printf (asm_out_file, <STR_LIT>);"
GCC,nvptx,475,The next statement will be an 'else' statement.
GCC,nvptx,476,"}

 joining_insn = parent -> inner ;"
GCC,nvptx,477,"The next statement will check if the mode class is not MODE_INT and is not MODE_FLOAT, and if it is, it will return true."
GCC,nvptx,478,The code will set the value of the "oa->mask" variable to "GOMP_DIM_MASK(ix)".
GCC,nvptx,479,The next statement could be "case <NUM_LIT+1>:" which would be one of the next possible cases in the switch statement.
GCC,nvptx,480,"The next statement will be a return statement, returning the variable ""mode."""
GCC,nvptx,481,"else

if (mode == SImode ) mode = DImode;"
GCC,nvptx,482,"</s><\#


The next statement could possibly be a return statement that specifies the data type or mode that the function will return."
GCC,nvptx,483,"}

The code snippet will return the result of the function call to promote_arg with the parameters mode and true."
GCC,nvptx,484,"</s>


}"
GCC,nvptx,485,gcc_unreachable( );
GCC,nvptx,486,"brackets . safe_push ( bracket ( back ) ) ; if ( dump_file ) fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> , back . first ? back . first -> index : <NUM_LIT> , back . second ) ;"
GCC,nvptx,487,break ;
GCC,nvptx,488,continue to check the remaining elements in the brackets array until the end of the loop
GCC,nvptx,489,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the contents of the functions and variables used in this code snippet.
GCC,nvptx,490,"</s>
 <s> if (first > last) {</s>

<s>
    reset_velocity();
</s>"
GCC,nvptx,491,A closing curly brace will be returned.
GCC,nvptx,492,"The next statement will be the closing curly brace, representing the end of the switch statement."
GCC,nvptx,493,// This code snippet does not have a valid ending and cannot be correctly predicted.
GCC,nvptx,494,TRUE
GCC,nvptx,495,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another conditional statement or a return statement.
GCC,nvptx,496,The next statement would be "gcc_assert (seen_vector_label || seen_worker_label);"
GCC,nvptx,497,break;
GCC,nvptx,498,"The next statement will check that 'insn' is not equal to the head instruction of the basic block (bb), and if it is not, it will set 'insn' to the previous instruction. Otherwise, it will break out of the loop."
GCC,nvptx,499,NULL
GCC,nvptx,500,"</s>

 return propagate_delay_slots(reg, pm);"
GCC,nvptx,501,"A new conditional statement checking for a variable named ""seen_barsync"" is likely to follow, with more code inside the curly braces."
GCC,nvptx,502,The next statement would be "else".
GCC,nvptx,503,The next statement would be the closing curly brace (}).
GCC,nvptx,504,"workaround_uninit_method_3();
break;"
GCC,nvptx,505,"}

None


The code snippet has already finished executing and there would be no further statements."
GCC,nvptx,506,A new rtx_insn object will be emitted after the previous one.
GCC,nvptx,507,"set_redirect-return ( reg ) }>

start_sequence ( ) ; set_redirect-return ( reg ) ; }"
GCC,nvptx,508,"The next statement of this code snippet is another nested loop involving the ""nvptx_comment"" flag and the cfun function, with a condition to skip any single predecessor basic blocks."
GCC,nvptx,509,"end_sequence ( ) ; } }</NUM_LIT>


The code will loop through each basic block in the current function (cfun) and check if the block has a single predecessor. If it does, it will skip to the next block. Next, it creates an auto_bitmap called ""bb_pseudo_uninit"" and fills it with the result of a bitmap_and_compl operation using the DF_LIVE_IN and DF_MIR_IN bitmaps from the current basic block. Then, it performs a bitmap_and_compl_into operation on ""bb_pseudo_uninit"" using the ""not_pseudo"" bitmap. It then creates"
GCC,nvptx,510,"} else { mode = DImode ; } </s>

<s>return mode;</s>"
GCC,nvptx,511,"The code snippet is incomplete, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. It depends on what comes after this code."
GCC,nvptx,512,"}

The code snippet will return a boolean value based on the result of the two calls to the lookup_attribute function."
GCC,nvptx,513,"<s> s << <STR_LIT> << ( is_defn ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ; s << name << <STR_LIT> ;
s << <STR_LIT> << name ;"
GCC,nvptx,514,</s>The value of 'name' will be incremented at the '*' index
GCC,nvptx,515,"else if (replaced_dots != NULL) {
    replacement = replaced_dots;
}"
GCC,nvptx,516,The next statement is a conditional statement that checks if the "not_atomic_weak_arg" variable is true.
GCC,nvptx,517,"if (result != NULL_RTX) write_return_mode (s, true, GET_MODE(result)); s << <STR_LIT>; }"
GCC,nvptx,518,The next statement is: s << <STR_LIT> ;
GCC,nvptx,519,s << pfx << ptx_type << <STR_LIT> << reg_names [ NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ] << sfx ;
GCC,nvptx,520,"</s>

<STR_LIT>"
GCC,nvptx,521,"}

return return_in_mem

return false"
GCC,nvptx,522,"The code will continue to write to the file using the variables ""align"", ""name"", and ""size"", likely as part of a larger function to output code."
GCC,nvptx,523,"The next statement will likely involve writing the variable's alignment, name, and size to the file."
GCC,nvptx,524,This code snippet will assemble the raw name and print it to the file.
GCC,nvptx,525,return 0;
GCC,nvptx,526,__functionAddress =
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,0,"<STR_LIT>

Check if the type is valid and return <STR_LIT> if it is not valid."
GCC,riscv,1,mode << <STR_LIT> << mlen << <STR_LIT> ;
GCC,riscv,2,"""mode"" will contain the string ""<STR_LIT>"" followed by the value of ""mlen"" and another instance of ""<STR_LIT>""."
GCC,riscv,3,"This code snippet is calculating the logarithmic value of a variable and then checking if it is a float or integer type. Based on the type, it will return the appropriate value. Therefore, the next statement might be a return statement, either for a floattype or inttype value."
GCC,riscv,4,The code will continue to execute with the next statements inside the conditional statement.
GCC,riscv,5,return lmul_str;
GCC,riscv,6,case <NUM_LIT> : return lmul_log2 >= <NUM_LIT> && !float_p ;
GCC,riscv,7,tree frflags = GET_BUILTIN_DECL ( CODE_FOR_riscv_fsflags ) ;
GCC,riscv,8,if ( subcode >= ARRAY_SIZE ( riscv_builtins ) ) return error_mark_node ;
GCC,riscv,9,"return riscv_expand_builtin_direct(d->icode, target, exp, false);"
GCC,riscv,10,"printf(""RISC-V builtin function at index %ld is %s\n"", i, riscv_builtins[i]);"
GCC,riscv,11,I cannot accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet as it depends on the specific values and conditions within the code.
GCC,riscv,12,"} float16_type_node

 = Float16TypeNode();

from riscv_float16_type_node(static init)"
GCC,riscv,13,"If the target does not have a hardware floating-point unit, do nothing."
GCC,riscv,14,"return riscv_expand_builtin_direct (riscv_expand_builtin_direct  (ICODE_SIGNBITP, target, exp, false));"
GCC,riscv,15,return d->insn;
GCC,riscv,16,"The next statement will likely check if the statement in the switch case is equal to RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT, and if it is, it will return the result of the riscv_expand_builtin_direct function with the parameters d->icode, target, exp, and true. If it is not equal, it will move on to the next case."
GCC,riscv,17,"enum insn_code icode = d -> icode ;


return riscv_expand_builtin_direct(icode, target, exp, true);"
GCC,riscv,18,"return NULL_RTX ;


<NUM_LIT> static const struct riscv_builtin_description riscv_builtins [ ] = { DIRECT_BUILTIN ( RISCV_BUILTIN ( RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT , # INSN , FUNCTION_TYPE , AVAIL ) , targets ! ) } ;"
GCC,riscv,19,"In this snippet, we are creating a temporary variable called ""old_flags"" and assigning it the value returned by the function ""GET_BUILTIN_DECL"" with the argument ""CODE_FOR_riscv_fsflags"". Then, we are using this variable as an argument to the function ""build_call_expr"" along with the function ""fsflags"" and a <NUM_LIT> argument, and assigning its return value to ""clear""."
GCC,riscv,20,"build4 ( TARGET_EXPR , RISCV_ATYPE_USI , old_flags , build_call_expr ( frflags , <NUM_LIT> ) , NULL_TREE , NULL_TREE )"
GCC,riscv,21,"The next statement would most likely be another ""case"" statement for a different type, followed by its corresponding code block."
GCC,riscv,22,The switch statement will check the value of the variable "type" and determine the appropriate action to take based on its value.
GCC,riscv,23,The code will execute the function riscv_expand_builtin_direct with the given parameters and return the result.
GCC,riscv,24,"riscv_prepare_builtin_arg ( & ops [ opno ++ ] , exp , argno + 1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,25,"free_RT

This code snippet does not contain any code related to freeing an RT (run-time) type, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,riscv,26,The next statement will add the function prototype to the list of built-in declarations for RISC-V architecture.
GCC,riscv,27,There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,28,"This code snippet is incomplete and unable to provide a meaningful prediction for the next statement. It depends on the specific values of the variables ""code,"" ""RISCV_BUILTIN_CLASS,"" ""loc,"" ""arg_loc,"" ""subcode,"" ""orig_fndecl,"" ""nargs,"" and ""args."" Without knowing those values, it is impossible to predict what the next statement will be."
GCC,riscv,29,"}

Populate the 'max_ext_len' variable with the length of the longest extension name in the current subset list and then initialize the 'buf' variable with a string format containing the respective subset name and version value."
GCC,riscv,30,"""End of the code."""
GCC,riscv,31,The statement after the last error statement will be an undefined function call with <STR_LIT> as its parameter.
GCC,riscv,32,The next statement could potentially add a pragma for an intrinsic function specific to the RISC-V architecture.
GCC,riscv,33,"break ; </s>

The code will move on to the next case statement in the switch statement."
GCC,riscv,34,The next statement will be to initialize an integer variable "version_value" and apply a conditional statement to it.
GCC,riscv,35,"</s>

abi = <STR_LIT> ;"
GCC,riscv,36,"// code goes here
The code snippet is likely defining a function called riscv_d_register_target_info, which takes in no arguments and returns nothing. The code following the function definition will likely contain the actual code to be executed when the function is called."
GCC,riscv,37,the code will add a built-in version to the program
GCC,riscv,38,if (TARGET_RVV) d_add_builtin_version(<STR_LIT>); else d_add_builtin_version(<STR_LIT>);
GCC,riscv,39,"The next statement will be ""return eval_value(reg, regno_to_rtx);""."
GCC,riscv,40,"The code will check if the expression is a binary operation and if so, it will evaluate the values of the two operands using the eval_value and regno_to_rtx functions. Then, it will switch on the code of the expression and perform the appropriate operation based on the case. In the case of MULT, if the first operand's value is constant, the code will return the product of the two values."
GCC,riscv,41,"ASSERT_TRUE ( rtx_equal_p ( src , CONST0_RTX ( mode ) ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,42,"""End of code snippet."""
GCC,riscv,43,"The code will parse the architecture string and set the new ABI type, then reinitialize the RISC-V processor."
GCC,riscv,44,rtx src =
GCC,riscv,45,"....

The code snippet will iterate through each mode in the MODE_VECTOR_BOOL class. For each mode, if it is a RISC-V vector mode, the code will start a new sequence and generate a register rtx for the mode. It will then emit a move instruction where CONSTM1_RTX is moved into the destination register. The next statement could potentially be a comparison or another operation using the destination register and CONSTM1_RTX."
GCC,riscv,46,The next statement would be "end_sequence();" to complete the "start_sequence();" statement.
GCC,riscv,47,Nothing follows. It is likely that the rest of the code is missing or was not included in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,48,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet.
GCC,riscv,49,The code will set up a function to test the RISC-V architecture and ABI using a custom setter for those parameters and then will create an object to dump the test results using a specified location and file path.
GCC,riscv,50,return global_options.arch;
GCC,riscv,51,The next statement will likely be a closing bracket or semicolon to end the function call.
GCC,riscv,52,"}

The next statement would likely involve manipulating or accessing the data contained in the memory address (mem) using the acquired register value (regno) and possibly performing some kind of operation or comparison."
GCC,riscv,53,"}

if (get_si_mem_base_reg (mem, &addr, &extend)) {HOST_WIDE_INT regno = REGNO (XEXP (addr, 0)); if (i == 0) {if (XEXP (pat, 0) == CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (XEXP (pat, 0)))) continue; } if (REG_N_REFS (regno) < 0) continue;}"
GCC,riscv,54,"} </s>

We cannot predict the next statement as the snippet does not contain enough information about the function ""analyze"" to determine what it will do next. It is also not specified what the function ""optimize_bb_for_speed_p"" does, so we cannot determine if the statement after the ""if"" condition will be executed or not."
GCC,riscv,55,"} } </s>

""The function will end."""
GCC,riscv,56,"// Code inside FOR_ALL_BB_FN loop
} 
The loop will execute the code inside the loop for each basic block in the given function."
GCC,riscv,57,"</s>

The next statement would be the end of the if statement, followed by the beginning of the next line of code."
GCC,riscv,58,"XEXP ( pat , i ) = replace_equiv_address ( mem , addr ) ; } } } }</s>

The code will check if the value stored in variable i is less than the value stored in another variable, and if so, it will increment i by 1."
GCC,riscv,59,"""The HOST_WIDE_INT regno will equal the REGNO ( XEXP ( addr, 0 ) ) value."""
GCC,riscv,60,"</s>

if uncompressing tail assembly support is enabled it will return optimize > <NUM_LIT> + 1 ;"
GCC,riscv,61,"</NUM_LIT>

True"
GCC,riscv,62,false; }
GCC,riscv,63,"return REG_P ( XEXP ( * addr , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,64,"return new shorten_memrefs_pass ( ctxt ) ;

int main() { 
    gcc::context *ctxt = new gcc::context; 
    rtl_opt_pass * pass = make_pass_shorten_memrefs(ctxt); 
    return 0; 
}

This code snippet creates a context object and uses it to call the function make_pass_shorten_memrefs, which then returns a shorten_memrefs_pass object. The pass object is then used in the main function."
GCC,riscv,65,"This code snippet appears to define a function or method called ""pass_shorten_memrefs"" that takes a parameter ""ctxt"" of type ""gcc :: context *"" and extends the ""rtl_opt_pass"" class or structure with the attributes ""pass_data_shorten_memrefs"" and ""ctxt"". The next statement may be a body or implementation of this function, which could include instructions or logic for optimizing memory references."
GCC,riscv,66,return new shorten_memrefs_pass ( ctxt );
GCC,riscv,67,"else { replace_equiv_address ( XEXP ( mem , <NUM_LIT> ) , XEXP ( addr , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; } } } } 
RTX parsing for the next code line."
GCC,riscv,68,"This snippet of code is checking if a dump file is open, and if it is, it will print a string literal to the file. It then sets a temporary variable, 'tmp', to the next instruction in the prologue. If that instruction is not a NOTE or if it is not the end of the prologue, the code will return. If it is a NOTE, it will continue to the next instruction until it reaches the end of the prologue or until there are no more instructions. If there are no instructions left or if the current instruction is not an INSN, the code will return."
GCC,riscv,69,"<x> }

for ( df_iterator_ref iter = df_begin ( DF_INSN_USE ( insn ), DF_REF_EXPRNO ( call_count ) ; ++ iter ) {"
GCC,riscv,70,"} return insn ; </s>

If the next statement of the code snippet is a for loop, it will check each instruction's use and stored in the variable use."
GCC,riscv,71,"""good_use"" will be set to false"
GCC,riscv,72,"</s>

""}"""
GCC,riscv,73,"</s>

This code snippet is missing a semicolon, so the prediction is that the next statement will be a closing curly brace."
GCC,riscv,74,The next statement is "rtx_insn * parent = PREV_INSN ( call );"
GCC,riscv,75,if ( NOTE_P ( insn ) ) { if ( NOTE_BRANCH_PREDICTED
GCC,riscv,76,return insn
GCC,riscv,77,"}

The return value of the function will be false."
GCC,riscv,78,return true;
GCC,riscv,79,"</s>

This code snippet ends with a return statement that returns the boolean value false."
GCC,riscv,80,return CP_FLUSH_CACHE
GCC,riscv,81,CP_EXECUTE_FUNCTION ;
GCC,riscv,82,The next statement of this code snippet will most likely be an if statement or a return statement that evaluates the condition specified.
GCC,riscv,83,FALSE
GCC,riscv,84,"<s> 
if (mode == MACHINE_MODE_64BIT) {
  printf(""The target has a 64-bit mode"");
} else {
  printf(""The target does not have a 64-bit mode"");
}"
GCC,riscv,85,"return e.expand_vector_libcall (libcall_expand (e.target, bds, rtx_TEMP, vlenb));"
GCC,riscv,86,This code snippet inserts a gassign and gimple statement into a function's gsi.
GCC,riscv,87,"build_init_assign (build_init(tmp_var), 0)"
GCC,riscv,88,I am unable to make a prediction as the if statement does not provide enough context to determine the logic of the code.
GCC,riscv,89,"}</s>

No prediction can be made as the snippet only contains one statement."
GCC,riscv,90,"}

""The next statement will return false."""
GCC,riscv,91,"b.set_shape("""", """", int);"
GCC,riscv,92,"pred_idx ++ )

The code will go through each value in the ""preds"" list within the ""group"" variable until it reaches an element that is equal to the value of ""NUM_PRED_TYPES""."
GCC,riscv,93,"++ pred_idx )
Pred_idx values will loop through elements in the ""group.preds"" array until the end of the array, represented by ""NUM_PRED_TYPES"", is reached."
GCC,riscv,94,"auto_vec < tree , <NUM_LIT> > return_values;"
GCC,riscv,95,The next statement will probably involve initializing or assigning a value to the "argument_types" variable.
GCC,riscv,96,"return c . require_immediate ( num , num , nvecs - 1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,97,b.finish_name();
GCC,riscv,98,add_label ( "L1" ) ;
GCC,riscv,99,"<
}"
GCC,riscv,100,"It is likely that the next statement would involve calling the ""tree_cons"" function with the parameters ""get_identifier ( name )"", ""NULL_TREE"", and ""attrs"". This function would likely be used to create a new tree node with the specified identifier and attributes."
GCC,riscv,101,It is not possible to make a prediction without knowing the context and purpose of the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,102,The next statement is: return rfn;
GCC,riscv,103,"}

The next statement would likely be another function or declaration within the ""function_expander"" class or a statement inside the function body."
GCC,riscv,104,"This code snippet creates an input operand using the ""op"" and ""mode"" parameters, and then advances to the next operation number."
GCC,riscv,105,"create_integer_operand (&m_ops [opno++], INTVAL(x));"
GCC,riscv,106,"First, an integer operand is created using the ""create_integer_operand"" function, with a reference to the m_ops array element at index opno. The value of x will be converted to an integer using the INTVAL function. Additionally, the opno variable will be incremented."
GCC,riscv,107,next statement: return mem;
GCC,riscv,108,"create_output_operand(&m_ops[opno++], target, mode);"
GCC,riscv,109,"</s>

""return"""
GCC,riscv,110,return type with added vector attribute
GCC,riscv,111,"</s>
TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type) = tree_cons (get_identifier (<STR_LIT>) , value , TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type)) ; TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type) will now have the mangled_name_tree added as an attribute."
GCC,riscv,112,"<e>


// Code to add a new operand for the specified machine mode:
// 1. Allocate a new operand slot
// 2. Set the slot's mode to the specified mode
// 3. Set the other attributes of the slot, such as type and size
// 4. Return the newly created operand"
GCC,riscv,113,"i < 5 ; i++ )
<i> {
   <i> cout << ""The value of i is: "" << i << endl;
}

The next statement will be ""cout << ""The value of i is: "" << i << endl;"" This will print the value of i as it increases from its initial value (<NUM_LIT>) until it reaches 4, since the loop stops when i < 5."
GCC,riscv,114,The function_builder will then proceed to create and allocate space for the argument types based on the given instance and store them in the provided vector.
GCC,riscv,115,"</s>

""If the base type of the next argument is not one of the numeric base types, the code will return true."""
GCC,riscv,116,append_name ( another_name ) ;
GCC,riscv,117,"}</s>

the statement will call the append_name function with the argument <STR_LIT>"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,118,"It is not possible to predict the exact next statement without seeing the rest of the code. However, based on the function name and arguments provided, it is likely that the statement is adding the ""name"" string to the ""m_string_obstack"" memory obstack and determining its length using the strlen function."
GCC,riscv,119,</s> obstack finish (&m_string_obstack);
GCC,riscv,120,default
GCC,riscv,121,"}

.
It is expected that the function will return a boolean value of true."
GCC,riscv,122,"}</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement as this code snippet already contains a terminating statement."
GCC,riscv,123,The next statement will insert <NUM_LIT> into the argument_types vector.
GCC,riscv,124,End of loop statement.
GCC,riscv,125,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement without further information about the code. The current statement appears to be the last statement in the function and it simply returns a boolean value of true."
GCC,riscv,126,"</s>

The code snippet is likely part of a function or method that returns the type mode of a specific argument within a larger data structure."
GCC,riscv,127,The code will return a pointer type that is qualified as const for the given tree.
GCC,riscv,128,"Most likely, this code will return a pointer type that is qualified as constant (built using the input type t)."
GCC,riscv,129,"goto function_instance

}

return some_value;"
GCC,riscv,130,instance. free( )
GCC,riscv,131,"}

</s> This function can be overloaded for different types of predication."
GCC,riscv,132,"}

false

True"
GCC,riscv,133,The code snippet will end with the statement "return true;"
GCC,riscv,134,"return rfn.check_args ( nargs , args ) ;

This code snippet returns the result of the function `rfn.check_args` with the arguments `nargs` and `args`."
GCC,riscv,135,}
GCC,riscv,136,The next statement would be: "return false ;"
GCC,riscv,137,"return ( flags &amp; Callable :: FALG_CONDITIONAL_THROW ) != 0 ;

""Return true if the flags include the condition for a potential trap."""
GCC,riscv,138,return (hash(value) == hash(key));
GCC,riscv,139,The next statement will end the function and return control back to the main program.
GCC,riscv,140,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or information about the base and this values.
GCC,riscv,141,"""The function will return an rtx value based on the input code, expression, and target."""
GCC,riscv,142,"The next statement is a return statement, which will return the result of calling the ""expand"" function on the object returned by the ""function_expander"" function."
GCC,riscv,143,"</s>

This code snippet returns a char pointer to the completed obstack."
GCC,riscv,144,"</s>


""Return the completed function name from the obstack."""
GCC,riscv,145,m_direct_overloads = m_direct_overloads + 1;
GCC,riscv,146,"}

""Instantiate the function_builder class and set the m_direct_overloads variable to the lang_GNU_CXX language."""
GCC,riscv,147,"</s>

This code defines a function call information class that inherits from a function instance class."
GCC,riscv,148,return fndecl;
GCC,riscv,149,This code snippet defines a function_checker constructor and initializes the member variables.
GCC,riscv,150,"This code snippet defines a function checker class that inherits from the function_call_info class. It takes in a location, function instance, function declaration, function type, number of arguments, and argument tree array as parameters. It then sets the function type and argument variables. The next statement is likely to be the start of the function checker's body, which will perform some operations on these variables."
GCC,riscv,151,The code creates an output operand if the function does not return void.
GCC,riscv,152,"This code snippet shows the definition of a function_instance class with six parameters - base_name_in, base_in, shape_in, type_in, pred_in, and op_info_in. These parameters are used to initialize the member variables - base_name, base, shape, type, pred, and op_info."
GCC,riscv,153,"The next statement is: 
}"
GCC,riscv,154,"if (  args ) {
		
		return (void p)
		
	}
}

This code snippet is not complete."
GCC,riscv,155,return NULL;
GCC,riscv,156,"""The code returns a null right-hand side value."""
GCC,riscv,157,It is not possible to make a prediction without knowing the specific context and values of the variables in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,158,"}   

return attrs;"
GCC,riscv,159,The next statement will be: "if (type != NUM_VECTOR_TYPES) { return type; }"
GCC,riscv,160,"if (type) {
   return function_types [ type_idx ] . type_indexes [ base_type ];
} else {
   return NUM_VECTOR_TYPES;
}"
GCC,riscv,161,The next statement will return the result of calling the function "gen_int_mode" with the arguments "get_prefer_mask_policy()" and "Pmode".
GCC,riscv,162,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could either return the result of the gen_int_mode function with the parameters (MASK_UNDISTURBED, Pmode) or return the result of the gen_int_mode function with the parameters from the get_prefer_mask_policy function and the parameter Pmode. It depends on the evaluation of the conditional statement in the first line."
GCC,riscv,163,"</s>

instance.process();"
GCC,riscv,164,"""Handle the returned function instance."""
GCC,riscv,165,"""Not found"""
GCC,riscv,166,else return builtin_types [ VECTOR_TYPE_vuint8m1_t ] . scalar_ptr ;
GCC,riscv,167,The return statement will access the scalar pointer from the vuint8mf8_t type in the builtin_types vector.
GCC,riscv,168,The next statement would most likely be a return statement that checks if the function type index is invalid and either returns NULL_TREE or the scalar value of the builtin type at the function type index.
GCC,riscv,169,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet will likely check if the type index of the function is equal to VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID. If it is, then it will return NULL_TREE. Otherwise, it will return the scalar value from the built-in types array at the index of the function type index."
GCC,riscv,170,"The next statement will be to return gen_int_mode (TAIL_UNDISTURBED, Pmode)."
GCC,riscv,171,"if ( pred == PRED_TYPE_tu || pred == PRED_TYPE_tum || pred == PRED_TYPE_tumu ) {
  return gen_int_mode( TAIL_UNDISTURBED, Pmode );
} else {
  // do something else
}"
GCC,riscv,172,This code snippet does not seem to follow standard coding conventions.
GCC,riscv,173,"</s>

Possible options:

1. If the function type index of the given type index is equal to VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID, return a NULL_TREE. Otherwise, return the vector type from the builtin types for the function type index from the given type index.
2. Return the builtin types vector type at the function type index from the given type index, unless the function type index is equal to VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID, in which case return a NULL_TREE.
3. Check if the function type index of the given type index is equal to VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID. If so, return a NULL_TREE. Otherwise, return the vector type from the builtin types"
GCC,riscv,174,"""Return the selected function type index, or NULL_TREE if it is invalid, then access the corresponding vector in the builtin types list."""
GCC,riscv,175,return;
GCC,riscv,176,The next statement would likely be an opening curly brace to begin the function definition.
GCC,riscv,177,"return gimple_build_call (gimple_location (gsi), code, gimple_call_fn (stmt), gimple_call_fnargs (stmt), false, NULL_TREE);"
GCC,riscv,178,</s><block clear_
GCC,riscv,179,"</s>

s: return;}"
GCC,riscv,180,"</s>

next

 ""}"""
GCC,riscv,181,It is impossible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the remaining code snippet.
GCC,riscv,182,"return 

next statement: }"
GCC,riscv,183,builder.produce(function_table);
GCC,riscv,184,The next statement will initialize the hash table with a size of <NUM_LIT>.
GCC,riscv,185,None. This is the end of the code and there are no further statements to be executed.
GCC,riscv,186,"</s>

This code snippet will exit the function and return the boolean value of ""true""."
GCC,riscv,187,There isn't enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be anything depending on the rest of the program and the developer's intention.
GCC,riscv,188,"</s>

The next statement would likely be the start of a conditional statement, such as ""if (rvv_switcher == true) {...}"""
GCC,riscv,189,"</s>

Nothing listed"
GCC,riscv,190,<s> set the type size attribute to NULL_TREE
GCC,riscv,191,"if (type == NULL) {
  return NULL;
}

""Closing curly brace"" (End of the function)"
GCC,riscv,192,if ( id != NULL) printf("The identifier pointer id is not null.");
GCC,riscv,193,The next statement is likely to be a closing bracket or semicolon.
GCC,riscv,194,"</s>

The next statement will either return true or the result of the operation (flags & ( CP_WRITE_MEMORY | CP_WRITE_CSR )) depending on the value of the flags variable."
GCC,riscv,195,The next statement would be to return the value of flags and perform a bitwise AND operation with the constants CP_WRITE_MEMORY and CP_WRITE_CSR.
GCC,riscv,196,"if ( flags & CP_READ_FSR << endl

false"
GCC,riscv,197,return flags & ACCESS_READS_GLOBAL_STATE;
GCC,riscv,198,"The next statement is:
const vector_types[type].mangled_name"
GCC,riscv,199,This code snippet sets attributes and registers a vector type.
GCC,riscv,200,tree uint16_type_node = get_typenode_from_name ( UINT16_TYPE ) ;
GCC,riscv,201,We cannot accurately predict the next statement without more context.
GCC,riscv,202,Declaration 'decl' will be pushed onto the stack of declarations.
GCC,riscv,203,"""Return the error at the specified location with the given string literal, the argument number plus the numerical literal, and the specific function declaration."""
GCC,riscv,204,"""An error has occurred at the specified location with argno and fndecl's value added by the numerical value of 1."""
GCC,riscv,205,"The next statement will be an error message using the ""error_at"" function at the current location, stating the argument number, actual value, minimum value, and maximum value that caused the out of range error."
GCC,riscv,206,A return statement indicating whether the given type matches any of the listed required extensions.
GCC,riscv,207,"}

The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a closing curly brace indicating the end of the function."
GCC,riscv,208,tree_fits_shwi_p ( arg ) ;
GCC,riscv,209,"}>

The next statement could be a conditional statement, checking if the value of ""actual"" is in the specified range of values between ""min"" and ""max""."
GCC,riscv,210,"assertion that the variable ""actual"" is within the range of ""min"" and ""max"" and if not, an out of range error will be reported and the code will return false."
GCC,riscv,211,There is no next statement. This code snippet ends with a function declaration.
GCC,riscv,212,"The next statement could be a function call or another return statement, depending on the rest of the code."
GCC,riscv,213,"</s>

CAR_COPY_CONSTEXPR


{
    <s> static_assert(is_rvv_base_type(base_type), ""base_type must be a valid RVV base type""); </s>
    RVV_COPY_CONSTEXPR(rvv_base_type) { set_base_type(base_type_in) }
    <s> } </s>
}"
GCC,riscv,214,"if ( is_rvv_base_type_char ( base_type_in )) { return rvv_arg_type_info ( base_type_in ); } </s>
'else {'"
GCC,riscv,215,"It seems like the next statement would involve using the copied data from the previous memcpy function. Perhaps this data will be used to make changes to the original ""have_regs_of_mode"" array, or it will be used in another function."
GCC,riscv,216,This code snippet will return "NULL_TREE" if the value of "type" is equal to "error_mark_node".
GCC,riscv,217,"Create a variable called ""comparison"" that holds the result of the ""gen_rtx_fmt_ee"" function, passing in the ""rcode"" variable, the ""mask_mode"" variable, and the ""op1"" and ""op2"" variables as parameters."
GCC,riscv,218,The next statement is likely to be: "return 0;" as it is a common statement found at the end of a function or code block.
GCC,riscv,219,"Check if the function has a merge operand, and if so, add an input operand."
GCC,riscv,220,It is unclear what the next statement would be without more context provided.
GCC,riscv,221,There is no further code to execute. The program will terminate after returning true.
GCC,riscv,222,The next statement will be "}" as it indicates the end of a function or code block.
GCC,riscv,223,"}


add_input_operand (mode, vd);"
GCC,riscv,224,"else if (!vd_accum_p) add_all_one_mask_operand ( mask_mode ( ) ) ) 

An rtx vs3 = expand_normal ( CALL_EXPR_ARG (exp, arg_offset++) );"
GCC,riscv,225,The code will return the generated instruction using the icode specified.
GCC,riscv,226,"The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function or code block."
GCC,riscv,227,"inline machine mode function expander :: vector mode ( void ) const {
  return TYPE_MODE(builtin_types[type.index].vector);
It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or knowledge about the specific code and logic being used."
GCC,riscv,228,The function_builder class is being destroyed and the allocated memory for m_string_obstack is being freed.
GCC,riscv,229,The next statement could possibly be a return statement that returns a value or variable.
GCC,riscv,230,The next statement would be: "if ( LABEL_P ( label_ref_label ( x ) ) ) LABEL_NUSES ( label_ref_label ( x ) ) ++ ;"
GCC,riscv,231,"The code will check if the vector of block information contains any elements with demand AVL and if so, it will return true. Otherwise, it will check if the AVL information of the current expression matches the previously obtained AVL information from the block info vector. If not, it will return false."
GCC,riscv,232,return true;
GCC,riscv,233,"if (bb && i->regular)
return true;"
GCC,riscv,234,return false;
GCC,riscv,235,return false;
GCC,riscv,236,"if ( set_vlval ( dest ) ) { 

return true;"
GCC,riscv,237,"If none of the previous if statements are triggered, the next statement will be to execute the code associated with the current instruction (i)."
GCC,riscv,238,"</s>

return hash_value > other.hash_value;"
GCC,riscv,239,"</s>

  return m_value;"
GCC,riscv,240,"Unknown, as the code snippet is incomplete."
GCC,riscv,241,">

For the given code snippet, the next statement is ""if ( curr_block_info . probability > block_info . probability )""."
GCC,riscv,242,The next statement would be "gcc_assert(block_info.reaching_out.valid_p());".
GCC,riscv,243,}
GCC,riscv,244,"The next statement could be a comparison using the compare_with function between two other insn_info objects, potentially using a different comparison operator."
GCC,riscv,245,"}

 If the ratio calculated using the function 'calculate_ratio' with the given 'sew' value is equal to the given 'ratio' value, then return the current vlmul value. Otherwise, return LMUL_RESERVED."
GCC,riscv,246,"""""""

The next statement will most likely be a return statement, followed by the calculated vlmul value based on the sew and ratio parameters passed into the function."
GCC,riscv,247,"The next statement is:

if ( m_vector_manager -> vector_exprs [ expr_id ] -> all_same_ratio_p ( m_vector_manager -> vector_avout [ e -> src -> index ] ) ) return false ;"
GCC,riscv,248,if ( all_valid_p == false ) throw new InvalidVLException();
GCC,riscv,249,"</s>

The next statement may be a call to the function ""replace_pattern"" with arguments ""rinsn"", ""new_pat"", and possibly a boolean value ""true"" or ""false""."
GCC,riscv,250,"The next statement will be:

rinsn = insn->rtl();"
GCC,riscv,251,The next statement will most likely be "return changed_p;".
GCC,riscv,252,"The next statement of this code snippet is:
""auto attempt = crtl->ssa->new_change_attempt();"""
GCC,riscv,253,"}
I"
GCC,riscv,254,end for loop
GCC,riscv,255,"The next statement will likely be another check or assertion related to vector configuration instructions, possibly followed by a call to eliminate_insn() on a specific instruction."
GCC,riscv,256,"This code snippet will insert an instruction at the end of the basic block specified by the control object, and then the function will check the instruction to see if it needs to be committed."
GCC,riscv,257,The next statement could be a "break" or "return <NUM_LIT>" depending on the conditions of the "case" statement that follows.
GCC,riscv,258,"The next statement will check if the demand_p function returns true, and if not, the function will return true."
GCC,riscv,259,"if ( demand_p ( DEMAND_NONZERO_AVL ) && other . has_non_zero_avl ( ) ) {
  // do something
} else {
  return false;
}"
GCC,riscv,260,if (compatible AVl_and_vtype_p(curr_info))
GCC,riscv,261,"It is likely that the next statement will have some sort of ""else"" statement, as the current code only covers the case where the ""if"" statement evaluates to true. This could be in the form of an ""else"" statement or an ""else if"" statement. The next statement could also be another nested ""if"" statement or a standalone statement outside of the current ""if"" statements. The exact code will depend on the situation and the programmer's intention."
GCC,riscv,262,"I'm sorry, I'm an AI language model and I cannot run code. I can only generate text based on the given input. Can you please provide more context or information for me to generate a relevant prediction?"
GCC,riscv,263,"} <STR_LIT>

This code snippet does not have any further statements."
GCC,riscv,264,"new_prob = curr_prob * crtl -> ssa -> probabilities [ e -> dest ] ; <ioa>
 ` new_prob = curr_prob * crtl->ssa->probabilities[e->dest]; `"
GCC,riscv,265,"The next statement could be the following:
if (curr_prob >= 0.5) break;"
GCC,riscv,266,"vector_antic will call the function bitmap_vector_ones, with parameters vector_transp and last_basic_block_for_fn(cfun)"
GCC,riscv,267,"The next statement will be ""bitmap_vector_ones ( vector_comp , last_basic_block_for_fn ( cfun ) ) ;"""
GCC,riscv,268,"</s>


return info;"
GCC,riscv,269,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,riscv,270,There are no more statements to execute.
GCC,riscv,271,<s> M_demands [ type + 1 ] = true ;
GCC,riscv,272,"} if ( dump_file ) { fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> ) ; fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> ) ; } if ( dump_file ) { fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> ) ; for ( const bb_info * bb : crtl -> ssa -> bbs ( ) ) if ( m_vector_manager -> vector_block_infos [ bb -> index ( ) ] . reaching_in . dirty_p ( ) ) fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> , bb -> index ( ) ) ; fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> ) ; }"
GCC,riscv,273,return false;
GCC,riscv,274,"It is likely that the next statement will be a logical comparison, such as an if statement, to determine if the vlmul values of info1 and info2 are not equal."
GCC,riscv,275,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement that checks if the output of "get_ma" from info1 is not equal to the output of "get_ma" from info2. The result of this conditional statement will then be returned.
GCC,riscv,276,"""return false;"""
GCC,riscv,277,"It is difficult to predict the exact code snippet without having the complete context. However, based on the current snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement or an expression that uses the return values from the ""get_sew"" methods of the info1 and info2 objects to check if they are equal or not. It could also be a statement that assigns the result of the comparison to a variable or uses it in some other operation."
GCC,riscv,278,The code will return a boolean value indicating if the tail policies of info1 and info2 are different.
GCC,riscv,279,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a conditional statement, checking if the current state is either DIRTY or DIRTY_WITH_KILLED_AVL and executing a certain block of code if that conditions is true."
GCC,riscv,280,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement, possibly checking for another condition or execution of code based on the current state being DIRTY or DIRTY_WITH_KILLED_AVL."
GCC,riscv,281,The next statement is likely to involve releasing and deleting the m_vector_manager object and setting it to nullptr.
GCC,riscv,282,"The snippet returns a boolean value after evaluating two conditions involving a pair and two sets of demands, and their compatibility."
GCC,riscv,283,The function will return a boolean value based on the conditions specified in the code.
GCC,riscv,284,"The next statement would be:

FOR_ALL_BB_FN (cfg_bb, cfun) { //code }"
GCC,riscv,285,"print_rtl_sequence ( dump_file , rinsn ) ;"
GCC,riscv,286,"}</s>

curr_info.set_avl_info(prev_info.get_avl_info())
The next statement is:
continue;"
GCC,riscv,287,"if ( emit_type == EMIT_AFTER ) emit_insn_after ( pat , rinsn ) ;"
GCC,riscv,288,<s> output the pattern instruction.
GCC,riscv,289,"}</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""empty_p"" that takes no arguments and returns a boolean value. The function returns true if the value of the variable ""m_state"" is equal to either ""EMPTY"" or ""HARD_EMPTY"". Therefore, the next statement could be a conditional statement using the ""empty_p"" function to check the status of ""m_state""."
GCC,riscv,290,return 0;
GCC,riscv,291,cout << "There are " << count << " items in the collection.";
GCC,riscv,292,"The next statement would likely involve using the first_insn variable in some way, such as comparing it to another variable or passing it as an argument to a function."
GCC,riscv,293,return 0
GCC,riscv,294,"}

Next, the code will check if there is a definition of the register (x) in the reverse order of non-debug instructions in the basic block (bb). If it is found, the code will return the instruction. If not, the code will return nullptr (a null pointer)."
GCC,riscv,295,return info1.get_ratio();
GCC,riscv,296,I cannot predict the next statement as it depends on the context and purpose of the code. It could be a return value or further manipulation of the value returned by the "get_vlmul" method.
GCC,riscv,297,"Assuming that the code snippet is part of a loop, the next statement would likely be the closing curly brace for the loop."
GCC,riscv,298,return info;
GCC,riscv,299,The next statement is "m_vector_manager -> to_delete_vsetvls . add ( insn -> rtl ( ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,300,rtladdress
GCC,riscv,301,vector_kill = nullptr;
GCC,riscv,302,"The next statement could be either a closing curly brace to end the innermost if statement, or a new line beginning with ""}"" to end the outer if statement."
GCC,riscv,303,"set_avl_info ( info1 . get_avl_info ( ) ) ; set_demand ( DEMAND_NONZERO_AVL , info1 . demand_p ( DEMAND_NONZERO_AVL ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,304,execute the demand function with the DEMAND_MASK_POLICY parameter
GCC,riscv,305,This code snippet will return.
GCC,riscv,306,"set_ta ( info2 . get_ta ( ) ) ; demand ( DEMAND_TAIL_POLICY ) ; } </s>

The code will check if there is a tail policy demand from either info1 or info2 and set the value for ta accordingly. Then, the code will initiate a tail policy demand."
GCC,riscv,307,"}
The code snippet will return an unknown function."
GCC,riscv,308,"First, a conditional statement is checked to see if either vsetvl_insn_p or vlmax_avl_p are true. If this is the case, a new rtx variable called ""dest"" is created using the get_vl function with the parameter rinsn. Then, a new_pat variable is assigned using the gen_vsetvl_pat function with the parameters VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, and dest. This new_pat variable is then returned."
GCC,riscv,309,}
GCC,riscv,310,This code creates an empty vector called "available_list" that can store elements of type "size_t".
GCC,riscv,311,There are no further statements in this code snippet.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,312,"} }</s>


The while loop will continue as long as the work_list is not empty."
GCC,riscv,313,"auto_vec < basic_block > next_block = work_list . pop ( ) ; if ( visited_list . contains ( next_block ) ) continue ; visited_list . insert ( next_block ) ;

next_block -> label_succs( );"
GCC,riscv,314,"It will return set_info objects with a specific format


This statement will return set_info objects that meet the specified criteria."
GCC,riscv,315,It will return the value of the current node in the AVL tree.
GCC,riscv,316,return avl_info;
GCC,riscv,317,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code in which this snippet is used.
GCC,riscv,318,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the contents of the m_avl variable and the specific functionality of the get_source() method.
GCC,riscv,319,"if ( may_cause_fault_on_load ( i ) ) { 


We can determine if the fault causing load instruction is in the same basic block as the current instruction."
GCC,riscv,320,"}</s>
 valid_avl_fusion"
GCC,riscv,321,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables being used in the code. The next statement could be any valid code statement depending on the values returned by the functions and the outcome of the boolean operations.
GCC,riscv,322,"</s>


The next statement would likely be a return statement, as indicated by the use of the ""get"" prefix and the fact that this is a function declaration. Possible return values could include ""true,"" ""false,"" or possibly some form of error message."
GCC,riscv,323,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the context of the code and understanding the purpose of the variable "m_demands." It could be anything from a simple return statement to a complex decision-making process.
GCC,riscv,324,"}</s>

It is likely that the next statement will involve using or accessing the value returned by the function call, possibly assigning it to a variable or passing it as an argument to another function."
GCC,riscv,325,"return <NUM_LIT> ;

This code looks for a particular expression in vector_exprs and returns its index. If the expression is not found, it returns <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,riscv,326,"}
The code will check if there is a definition of the VL_REGNUM variable in the next instruction, and if so, it will return a null pointer."
GCC,riscv,327,The next statement could be another conditional statement or a line of code executing a certain function. It is not clear from the given code snippet.
GCC,riscv,328,"cout << ""Throwing a runtime error"";

throw runtime_error(""Could not find any hard-coded values"");"
GCC,riscv,329,return vector_insn_info();
GCC,riscv,330,It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the context and the rest of the code. The next statement could be anything from a simple assignment or function call to a loop or conditional statement.
GCC,riscv,331,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context."
GCC,riscv,332,"""The code block contains a method named get_ma that returns a boolean value and is marked as constant."""
GCC,riscv,333,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code and understanding the context in which this snippet is used.
GCC,riscv,334,// This code snippet does not provide enough information to predict the next statement. It is possible that there is no next statement and the function ends here.
GCC,riscv,335,The code will return nullptr.
GCC,riscv,336,"""The function will iterate through the given hash set of set_info objects, checking if each set's corresponding basic block's cfg_bb matches the given cfg_bb. If a match is found, the function will return the set_info object. If no match is found, the function will return a nullptr."""
GCC,riscv,337,"}</s>


There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet."
GCC,riscv,338,This code snippet does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It would depend on the context of the larger program.
GCC,riscv,339,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing what code comes after this snippet.
GCC,riscv,340,"socket.getState() }

{return socket.getState();}"
GCC,riscv,341,It is not possible to predict the next statement without the context of the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,342,The next statement could be "return info;".
GCC,riscv,343,"}

Assuming there is no additional code, the predicted next statement would be the end of the function, indicating that the function has finished executing. It may look something like this: 

} // end of function"
GCC,riscv,344,"Since this is the end of the code snippet and there is no more logic after this statement, the next statement would likely be the end of the function or the end of the program."
GCC,riscv,345,"fig

</s> It is likely that the next statement would be the end of a function or conditional statement, as it doesn't make sense for the code to end with a figure."
GCC,riscv,346,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
GCC,riscv,347,The next statement could be evaluating whether both the "tail agnostic" (ta) and "mask agnostic" (ma) p values are true or not.
GCC,riscv,348,"- If neither info2.demand_p nor info2.demand_p DEMAND_GE_SEW is true, the code will return true."
GCC,riscv,349,"</s>

 It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code, as it depends on the specific conditions and outputs of the functions being called."
GCC,riscv,350,"}</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ge_sew_ratio_unavailable_p that takes in two vector_insn_info objects and returns either true or false. It first checks if the second object does not have the demand for a logical multiplication (LMUL) and has a demand for a ""greater or equal"" sew (GE_SEW). If this condition is met, the function will return the result of comparing the sew values of the two objects. Otherwise, the function will always return true."
GCC,riscv,351,return false;
GCC,riscv,352,"This code snippet will return the maximum value between the ""sew"" values of two info objects, using the std::max function."
GCC,riscv,353,It will compare the "sew" values from two "info" objects and return the larger value using the "max" function from the standard library.
GCC,riscv,354,"}
This function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current state is HARD_EMPTY."
GCC,riscv,355,The code will return a boolean value indicating whether the AVL tree has any immediate elements.
GCC,riscv,356,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. Please provide more information about the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,357,return m_reg == 0 && m_avl;
GCC,riscv,358,It will return a boolean value indicating whether the AVL has no registered items.
GCC,riscv,359,"</s>

It will either return ""true"" or ""false"" depending on whether the AVL has been registered or not."
GCC,riscv,360,"This code snippet checks if the given function has any non-debug instructions with a specified operand type, and returns true if there is at least one such instruction, or false if there are none."
GCC,riscv,361,return false;
GCC,riscv,362,"</s>

""return recog_memoized (rinsn) < <NUM_LIT>"""
GCC,riscv,363,"Slots 

} 

return false;"
GCC,riscv,364,The next statement would be "return true;" as there are no more conditional statements or loops.
GCC,riscv,365,"The next statement will likely involve some kind of conditional statement or loop, as the current statement is checking for a specific condition."
GCC,riscv,366,The next statement cannot be predicted as there is no code after the opening brace.
GCC,riscv,367,FALSE
GCC,riscv,368,"<s>

}"
GCC,riscv,369,"}


The next statement could be an action performed on the m_vector_manager object, such as calling a function or accessing a specific attribute."
GCC,riscv,370,"The next statement would be 'if ( <NUM_LIT> )' followed by the conditional statements 'if ( INSN_P ( pat ) ) add_label_notes ( PATTERN ( pat ) , new_insn )' and 'if ( pat == pat_end ) break'."
GCC,riscv,371,The next statement is "if ( JUMP_P ( pat ) || ( NONJUMP_INSN_P ( pat ) && ( ! single_succ_p ( cfg_bb ) || single_succ_edge ( cfg_bb ) -> flags & EDGE_ABNORMAL ) ) ) {"."
GCC,riscv,372,"If neither of the previous conditions are satisfied, return false."
GCC,riscv,373,"</s>

This code snippet is used to determine whether a given instruction should be added to a specified list of instructions based on the types of instructions that are allowed to be added."
GCC,riscv,374,"if ( dump_file ) fprintf ( dump_file , <STR_LIT> ) ; for ( const bb_info * bb : crtl -> ssa -> bbs ( ) ) compute_global_backward_infos ( bb ) ;"
GCC,riscv,375,The next statement would be "return true;"
GCC,riscv,376,info1 and info2 do not have the same VLMUL value and at least one of them demands sewing and/or a ratio.
GCC,riscv,377,}
GCC,riscv,378,"</s>

'}'"
GCC,riscv,379,"There are not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could be a function call, a conditional statement or an assignment."
GCC,riscv,380,ma = get_attr_ma ( rinsn );
GCC,riscv,381,"</s>

""succeeded in looping through all demand elements"""
GCC,riscv,382,The next statement would likely be a condition or comparison statement that checks if the value of m_source is equal to the value returned by calling the get_source() method on the object referred to by the "other" variable.
GCC,riscv,383,There is no other statement to be predicted in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,384,"If none of the conditions are met in the if statement, the next statement will be ""false""."
GCC,riscv,385,This snippet checks for various attributes and conditions in an instruction and sets corresponding values in the m_demands map.
GCC,riscv,386,The next statement will be "if (has_vl_op(insn->rtl())) m_demands[DEMAND_AVL] = true;"
GCC,riscv,387,"<P>

The next statement would probably define some variables or functions specific to the pass_vsetvl function."
GCC,riscv,388,The next statement could be the creation of a class or method within the pass_vsetvl function.
GCC,riscv,389,"offer more details in Predict



The next statement will be a conditional if statement. It will check if the function ""info1.has_non_zero_avl()"" or the function ""info2.has_non_zero_avl()"" returns a false value. If either of them returns false, the code will execute the following block of code. If both functions return true, the code will not execute the following block."
GCC,riscv,390,send a boolean value to the variable "need_commit" based on the result of the function "commit_vsetvls()"
GCC,riscv,391,"If vlmax_avl_p ( avl ) is true, the code will continue. Otherwise, it will generate a new pattern using the gen_vsetvl_pat function and validate the change if there are no non-debug instruction uses. The code will then continue to the next iteration of the loop."
GCC,riscv,392,The next statement might be a closing bracket or the end of the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,393,"std :: ostream & dump_file = *dump_file ; m_vector_manager -> dump ( dump_file ) ;

""The code snippet will print the dump file using ostream function."""
GCC,riscv,394,"'store the result of the function calculate_ratio, where the parameters are the values returned by the methods get_sew() and get_vlmul() from the objects info2 and info1 respectively'"
GCC,riscv,395,"}

return get_attr_type (rinsn) == TYPE_RDVL;"
GCC,riscv,396,return true if insn is a real instruction and is in the same basic block as bb.
GCC,riscv,397,"The next statement would be ""continue;"", continuing to the next iteration of the loop."
GCC,riscv,398,"In the next iteration of the loop, the code will check if the current instruction (rinsn) is a vector configuration instruction. If it is, it will add it to the vector manager's ""to_refine_vsetvls"" set and continue to the next instruction. If it is not a vector configuration instruction, the code will set the current instruction to the previous instruction (PREV_INSN) and generate a new pattern (new_pat) using the gen_vsetvl_pat function. Finally, the change_insn function will be used to replace the current instruction (rinsn) with the new pattern (new_pat)."
GCC,riscv,399,"</s>

if (def_insn->regs_read().find(reg) != def_insn->regs_read().end()) return true;"
GCC,riscv,400,"It is not possible to predict the exact statement without more context, but it is likely that the code will continue to execute and perform some kind of cleanup or memory management. It is also possible that an error or assertion will be thrown."
GCC,riscv,401,The next statement will likely be a closing bracket to end the void vector_infos_manager class.
GCC,riscv,402,"</s>

This code snippet returns a boolean value indicating whether the current vl_vtype_info object has the same AVL as the other vl_vtype_info object, and if the AVL sources are also the same."
GCC,riscv,403,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without additional context. The code appears to be comparing the values associated with different demand variables, but the next statement could be any number of things depending on the purpose and function of the code."
GCC,riscv,404,The next statement could be a comparison expression evaluating whether the value returned by the "get_ratio()" function is equal to the value returned by the "other.get_ratio()" function.
GCC,riscv,405,"This code snippet is likely part of a class that contains information about a specific vector type. The next statement may involve comparing more attributes of the vector type, or calling a function to manipulate or use the information stored in the object."
GCC,riscv,406,"... </s>

}"
GCC,riscv,407,return get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_VFMAFV
GCC,riscv,408,Not enough information to provide a prediction as the code snippet is incomplete and there is no clear indication of what the function is trying to accomplish.
GCC,riscv,409,return info2.ratio;
GCC,riscv,410,return info2;
GCC,riscv,411,TRUE
GCC,riscv,412,This code snippet compares the product of the sew of info1 and the ratio of info2 to a constant value.
GCC,riscv,413,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of info2 and info1. Depending on their values, the return statement could evaluate to a boolean value, a numeric value, or result in an error."
GCC,riscv,414,It is not possible to predict the next statement with the information given as it is dependent on the context of the code and the specific programming language being used.
GCC,riscv,415,The function will return a boolean value indicating whether the second sewing value is less than the first sewing value.
GCC,riscv,416,"return vlmul_type(info2.vlen(), info2.clmul2x2());"
GCC,riscv,417,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could be part of a larger code snippet, or it could be the end of the code. It is also unclear what the variable ""avl"" represents."
GCC,riscv,418,"}</s>

This code defines a function called ""set_avl_info"" that takes in a variable of type ""avl_info"" as a parameter and assigns it to a variable called ""m_avl."""
GCC,riscv,419,"}

This is a function named ""set_demand"" that sets the value of a demand type to a Boolean value in an array."
GCC,riscv,420,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement with this information, as it depends on the specific context and purpose of the code. It could be anything from another assignment or calculation to a function call or control flow statement."
GCC,riscv,421,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context about the code snippet. Please provide more information.
GCC,riscv,422,FULL
GCC,riscv,423,"}



""m_state"" will be set to ""HARD_EMPTY,"""
GCC,riscv,424,cerr << "Hard drive is now empty.";
GCC,riscv,425,"There was no closing semicolon, so the next statement is likely to be a syntax error."
GCC,riscv,426,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and code surrounding this snippet. Please provide more information for accurate predictions.
GCC,riscv,427,This is not a valid code statement.
GCC,riscv,428,The function set_ma takes a boolean argument and does not return a value.
GCC,riscv,429,"There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. The code could continue with a mathematical calculation, a conditional statement, a function definition, or something else entirely."
GCC,riscv,430,"}</s>

The next statement will be a closed curly brace ""}"" indicating the end of the set_ratio function."
GCC,riscv,431,"There is no next statement, this is the last line of the code snippet."
GCC,riscv,432,"Since this code snippet contains incomplete code, there is no way to accurately predict the next statement. More context or information would be needed to make a prediction."
GCC,riscv,433,This code snippet does not have any further statements as it is incomplete.
GCC,riscv,434,"}
The next statement will set the state of the object to ""VALID""."
GCC,riscv,435,cout << "The value of m_vlmul is now " << m_vlmul << endl;
GCC,riscv,436,The code will emit a VSETVL instruction before the current instruction.
GCC,riscv,437,The code will conclude with the end of the function or program and begin executing any code that follows after this snippet is complete.
GCC,riscv,438,if (insn2 == NULL) return false;
GCC,riscv,439,"The next statement is likely to be a comparison using the gcc_assert function, possibly checking if the sizes of the sets within the insn1 and insn2 objects are equal."
GCC,riscv,440,The code will return false.
GCC,riscv,441,The next statement would be "Int t = get_attr_t ( rinsn ) ;".
GCC,riscv,442,"The next statement would be: 
return ta == INVALID_ATTRIBUTE ? get_default_ta ( ) : IS_AGNOSTIC ( ta ) ;"
GCC,riscv,443,"Based on the syntax of this code snippet, the next statement will likely end the current function or method and return to the caller."
GCC,riscv,444,No prediction can be made based on this code snippet alone. Additional context is needed to determine the next statement.
GCC,riscv,445,"If the conditions in the if statement are not met, the code will return. Otherwise, the variable ""info"" will be set to the value of ""require""."
GCC,riscv,446,"</s>

The next statement would be to continue with the rest of the code if the condition of the if statement is not met, or to exit the program if the condition is fulfilled."
GCC,riscv,447,"}
//It will return the boolean value of whether m_state is equal to UNINITIALIZED."
GCC,riscv,448,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet does not provide any further information or context."
GCC,riscv,449,It looks like the next statement will be "set_insn ( insn ) ;" followed by "return true ; }".
GCC,riscv,450,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. More context is needed to determine the purpose and logic of the code, as well as any potential conditional statements or loops."
GCC,riscv,451,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without further context or information about the code and its purpose.
GCC,riscv,452,"</s>

This statement is likely checking the validity state of a variable and returning a boolean value indicating whether or not it is valid."
GCC,riscv,453,FALSE
GCC,riscv,454,"It will produce a boolean value, with true indicating that the value of 'sew' is between the specified bounds and its exact log2 can be determined, and false indicating otherwise."
GCC,riscv,455,"<e> if (DEBUG_EMPTY_PAT (&amp; rinsn-> pattern))


return false;"
GCC,riscv,456,"return ((rinsn != NULL) && (GET_CODE (rinsn) == CODE );

return ((rinsn != NULL) && (GET_CODE (rinsn) == VECTOR_CONFIG));"
GCC,riscv,457,"</s>

Create a vector of instruction information for the next block of instructions within the control flow graph."
GCC,riscv,458,m_exception ( nullptr )
GCC,riscv,459,m_num_demands = 0;
GCC,riscv,460,This code snippet is checking if the input instruction code (rinsn) is equal to either CODE_FOR_vlmax_avlsi or CODE_FOR_vlmax_avldi. The next statement could be a conditional statement or a return statement depending on the result of the evaluation.
GCC,riscv,461,"return rinsn != NULL || rinsn->src != NULL;

if (rinsn->dest == NULL) {
    printf(""Invalid instruction."");
}"
GCC,riscv,462,I cannot predict the next statement because the code snippet provided is incomplete and does not contain enough context.
GCC,riscv,463,It is likely that the next statement will involve some sort of calculation or returning a value based on the information provided in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,464,m_max_enc_ratio ( <NUM_LIT> )
GCC,riscv,465,return m_ma;
GCC,riscv,466,"</s>

This code snippet checks if a given instruction is a discard result vector configuration instruction, and returns a boolean value indicating whether it is or not. The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace for the function."
GCC,riscv,467,The return statement will return true if the INSN_CODE of the input rinsn is either CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultdi or CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultsi.
GCC,riscv,468,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a conditional statement or another function call that uses the returned value as a condition. For example:

if (( INSN_CODE ( rinsn ) == CODE_FOR_vsetvldi || INSN_CODE ( rinsn ) == CODE_FOR_vsetvlsi ) {
  // do something
}"
GCC,riscv,469,"<reference>:

add_constraint ( CONSTRAINT, 1 , GE ) ;"
GCC,riscv,470,"no Adding a new AVL type to the list

`(avl_type_list)` will become the new type for the AVL tree."
GCC,riscv,471,"The next statement could possibly be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
GCC,riscv,472,"_add_operation (tail_policy_rtx, mask_policy_rtx, Pmode);"
GCC,riscv,473,"The statement after this snippet will be the closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function definition."
GCC,riscv,474,"</s>


The next statement might be something like: ""// Function code goes here"" or ""return;"" indicating that the actual code for the function will be written inside the curly braces."
GCC,riscv,475,return;
GCC,riscv,476,case <NUM_LIT> :<NUM_LIT> = sew / <NUM_LIT> ;<NUM_LIT> break ; case LMUL_8 : ratio = sew /
GCC,riscv,477,"</s>

The next statement would likely be a conditional statement or a return statement using the variables vector_bits, elt_size, and min_size to calculate a value."
GCC,riscv,478,"""It will return true."""
GCC,riscv,479,<s> The value of the variable "sew" will be assigned based on the value of the variable "vmode".
GCC,riscv,480,"</s>

# The function will generate an instruction for setting the vector length to the maximum supported value, using the passed-in machine mode and VL register."
GCC,riscv,481,"emit_nvlmax_op(icode, NULL_RTX, dest, src, len, mask_mode, true);"
GCC,riscv,482,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It depends on the context in which this code snippet appears and the data being processed.
GCC,riscv,483,e.add_vundef_operand(mode);
GCC,riscv,484,"The code will emit an op, with the instruction code ""icode"", a NULL RTX, a destination ""dest"", source ""src"", a length ""len"", in ""mask_mode"", with a condition ""true""."
GCC,riscv,485,"emit_pred_op (icode, NULL_RTX, dest, src, len, mask_mode, false);"
GCC,riscv,486,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement with the given information. It will depend on the values of the variables and the logic of the "calculate_ratio" and "emit_hard_vlmax_vsetvl" functions.
GCC,riscv,487,"if (optimize) {
  emit_insn(gen_vlmax_avl(Pmode, vl, gen_int_mode(ratio, Pmode)));
} else {
  emit_hard_vlmax_vsetvl(vmode, vl);
}"
GCC,riscv,488,"""""""

The code snippet ends."
GCC,riscv,489,"} </s>

The function 'expand_insn' will be called with the parameters 'icode', 'm_opno', and 'm_ops', and the variable 'temporary_volatile_ok' will be initialized to 'true'."
GCC,riscv,490,"emit_move_insn ( target, tmp )"
GCC,riscv,491,"}

The next statement could be another conditional statement or a program output related to the predX operation."
GCC,riscv,492,The statement will likely be "}" indicating the end of the function.
GCC,riscv,493,"The generated register rtx will be used to emit an instruction to set the value of the created register to the result of a comparison operator between the operands given, using the 'greater than or equal' comparison mode."
GCC,riscv,494,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement or function call to check the value of "sew" and determine the appropriate course of action in the code.
GCC,riscv,495,The next statement will return a value specified by the function "gen_vsetvl_no_side_effects".
GCC,riscv,496,builder . quick_push ( const2_rtx ) ;
GCC,riscv,497,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing what values are assigned to the variables "type" and "Pmode."
GCC,riscv,498,"float j


Next statement: return (float) (j * ma);"
GCC,riscv,499,"return ma & MASK; 

}

The next statement will be to close the function body with a closing curly brace."
GCC,riscv,500,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot produce a prediction. It would depend on the variables and functions used in the code for a prediction to be made.
GCC,riscv,501,"The next statement is likely to be a return statement for the function, such as ""return mask_policy;"" or ""return default_mask_policy;"" depending on the code inside the function."
GCC,riscv,502,"}</s>

The next statement would be to close the function and brace the code."
GCC,riscv,503,"The next statement will likely be a conditional statement checking if the target minimum vector length is equal to a numerical value. If it is, the function will return the corresponding ratio from the ""mode_vtype_infos"" variable for a vector length of 32. Otherwise, it will return the ratio for a vector length of 64."
GCC,riscv,504,"I cannot accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the values of TARGET_MIN_VLEN and mode. If TARGET_MIN_VLEN is equal to <NUM_LIT>, the first return statement will be executed, otherwise the second return statement will be executed."
GCC,riscv,505,"return SEW[mode]; 

""return SEW[mode];"""
GCC,riscv,506,16
GCC,riscv,507,"}//
""// End of code snippet"""
GCC,riscv,508,"There is no more code to be executed, so the program will exit."
GCC,riscv,509,"return TARGET_MIN_VLEN

It looks like the next statement will be ""return TARGET_MIN_VLEN"" as part of the default case."
GCC,riscv,510,"The next statement will check if the inner mode is equal to the inner mode of a specific machine mode, the number of units is known to be equal to the number of units of the machine mode, and if the machine mode is a riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p, and if all conditions are met, the return statement will be executed."
GCC,riscv,511,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the values of TARGET_MIN_VLEN and NUM_LIT, as well as the current value of mode. The if statement will only execute one of the two return statements, depending on the evaluated condition."
GCC,riscv,512,"i32vl = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
emit_insn (gen_no_side_effects_vsetvl_rtx (demote_mode, NULL_RTX, i32vl));"
GCC,riscv,513,The else statement will be executed.
GCC,riscv,514,"case LTU : 

case CS:

return cast_pointer_to_uint ( x ) ;"
GCC,riscv,515,// Next statement will most likely initialize some variables or perform some operation using the values stored in the variables defined in this function.
GCC,riscv,516,return m_opno * 2;
GCC,riscv,517,"return emit_move_insn ( tmp , src ) && emit_move_insn ( dest , tmp ) ; }</s>

The next statement could be a return statement with a condition checking for the success of previously executed expressions."
GCC,riscv,518,"emit_vlmax_op ( code_for_pred_mov ( mode ) , src , dest , mask_mode ) ;"
GCC,riscv,519,vlmul_for_min_vlen32 [ MODE ## mode ] = VLMUL_FOR_MIN_VLEN32 ;
GCC,riscv,520,"<\s>

else if ( INTVAL ( x ) < 0x8000 && INTVAL ( x ) >= -0x8000 ) return true ;"
GCC,riscv,521,"}

""true"""
GCC,riscv,522,Generate code to broadcast a predicate value across a vector using the scalar operand as the source for the predicate.
GCC,riscv,523,return false
GCC,riscv,524,"This code snippet checks if the variable ""x"" is not a constant integer. If it is, the code will return false. If it is a constant integer, the code will use the IN_RANGE function to check if the integer value of ""x"" is between two other numbers, and will return the result of that comparison."
GCC,riscv,525,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of the various variables in the code snippet. However, it is likely that the code will continue to perform operations on the variables ""unspec"", ""demote_mode"", ""temp"", ""demote_mask_mode"", ""merge"", ""ops"", ""ta"", ""ma"", ""vl_x2"", ""demote_scalar_op1"", and ""demote_scalar_op2"". Possible operations could include generating an instruction, assigning values to variables, and comparing or manipulating data."
GCC,riscv,526,"The next statement is:
ops [ < NUM_LIT > ] = demote_scalar_op1;"
GCC,riscv,527,last_value = save_libcall_adjustment
GCC,riscv,528,"if n is not equal to 0 and mode is not equal to BLKmode, then return n plus GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) . to_constant ( ) plus UNITS_PER_WORD minus <NUM_LIT> divided by UNITS_PER_WORD"
GCC,riscv,529,"Without further context, it is impossible to predict what the next statement will be. It could be any valid code statement depending on what code comes after the <s> symbol."
GCC,riscv,530,The for loop will iterate through all the general purpose registers (GP_REG_FIRST to GP_REG_LAST) and create a new register note using the current register (gen_rtx_REG) and add it to the end of the dwarf list.
GCC,riscv,531,"The next statement would likely be a return statement, as it appears the code snippet is preparing to end the function and return the ""dwarf"" variable."
GCC,riscv,532,"""The function returns the cost of executing instructions in double-insns if x is not in vector mode and has a mode size of UNITS_PER_WORD multiplied by <NUM_LIT>, otherwise it returns the cost of executing instructions in single-insns."""
GCC,riscv,533,"It is expected that the code will return the result of the function COSTS_N_INSNS with the argument double_insns or single_insns, depending on the condition that the mode of the variable 'x' is not a vector mode and its size is equal to the constant UNITS_PER_WORD multiplied by <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,riscv,534,"riscv_block_move_loop(dest, src, length, bytes_per_iter);"
GCC,riscv,535,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement, checking the value of ""test"" and deciding whether to continue with the code execution or not."
GCC,riscv,536,The next statement is extern const <NUM_LIT> riscv_max_nshift = <NUM_LIT> * <NUM_LIT> - <NUM_LIT>;
GCC,riscv,537,"else{

codes[<NUM_LIT>].code = UNKNOWN;
codes[<NUM_LIT>].value = (value << (<NUM_LIT> - upper_trailing_ones)) | ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) value >> (<NUM_LIT> + upper_trailing_ones));
codes[<NUM_LIT>].code = ROTATERT;
codes[<NUM_LIT>].value = <NUM_LIT> - upper_trailing_ones;
cost = <NUM_LIT>;
}"
GCC,riscv,538,if (GET_CODE(x) == LOW) return false;
GCC,riscv,539,"</s>


If all conditions are met, the statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the interrupt handler is set."
GCC,riscv,540,"return riscv_valid_base_commandes:
returns ""true"" if the switch is not triggered or duplicate of previous case, otherwise false"
GCC,riscv,541,The next statement will be "case CONST_INT :".
GCC,riscv,542,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code. Additional information is needed to determine the next action or instruction the program will perform.
GCC,riscv,543,The code will continue with a loop that sets bits in the components bitmap for GP and FP registers based on a set of conditions.
GCC,riscv,544,"""Return components."""
GCC,riscv,545,"if ( TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_ABIVERSION_ <NUM_LIT> ) {
A Closing curly brace for the first if statement."
GCC,riscv,546,for ( int regno = FP_REG_FIRST ; regno <= FP_REG_LAST ; regno ++ ) fixed_regs [ regno ] = call_used_regs [ regno ] = 0;
GCC,riscv,547,for ( int regno = 0; regno < <NUM_LIT> ; regno ++ ) fixed_regs [ regno ] = call_used_regs [ regno ] = <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,riscv,548,"riscv_bytes_per_vector_chunk = TARGET_MIN_VLEN <NUM_LIT> ; } </s>

riscv_convert_vector_bits();"
GCC,riscv,549,"** ** next

 The next statement could potentially include a conditional check or loop, as the function has two parameters that could be used for comparison or iteration. The code snippet does not provide any context or specific instructions, so the exact next statement cannot be determined."
GCC,riscv,550,This is an incomplete function definition.
GCC,riscv,551,The next statement will be "return s;"
GCC,riscv,552,"<s1>

s1->__align = align"
GCC,riscv,553,"}

riscv_finalize_encoding(true);"
GCC,riscv,554,">

The next statement could be a ""default"" case in the switch statement, where an error message is outputted because none of the given cases are matched."
GCC,riscv,555,"This code snippet includes several cases, which indicate that the next statement will depend on which case is being executed. However, in general, the next statement will likely involve assigning values to the variables op0 and op1, potentially using the function riscv_force_binary()."
GCC,riscv,556,"}</s>

A comparison between ""target"" and ""inv_target"" will be emitted if ""invert_ptr"" is equal to <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,riscv,557,The next statement is calling the "riscv_process_components" function with the parameter "components" and the boolean value "true".
GCC,riscv,558,"Initialize the process with the given components, and set it to run in parallel (true)."
GCC,riscv,559,return FLT_EVAL_METHOD_PROMOTE_TO_FLOAT16
GCC,riscv,560,"<s>

The next statement will return FLT_EVAL_METHOD_PROMOTE_TO_FLOAT16."
GCC,riscv,561,"return SET

True"
GCC,riscv,562,"gcc_assert (reg_or_0_operand (cons, mode));
cond = gen_rtx_fmt_ee((code == EQ) ? NE : EQ, mode, op0, op1);"
GCC,riscv,563,"The next statement would likely be: 
if (GET_CODE(cond) == EQ) { // do something }"
GCC,riscv,564,"REG_NOTES ( insn ) = dwarf ; }

""Simplify the content by omitting unnecessary code and adding comments.""

<s> // Initialize variables
rtx ra = gen_rtx_REG( Pmode, RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM );
rtx insn;
bool need_barrier_p = known_ne( get_frame_size() + cfun->machine->frame.arg_pointer_offset, <NUM_LIT> );

// Check if function is naked
if (cfun->machine->naked_p) {
  gcc_assert(style == NORMAL_RETURN);
  emit_jump_insn( gen_return() );
  return;
}

// Check if return instruction can be used"
GCC,riscv,565,"emit_insn ( riscv_normalize_stack_address ( frame ) ) ; } else { emit_insn ( riscv_normalize_stack_address ( frame ) ) ; }""

The code snippet appears to be using the RISC-V instruction set to create a return instruction, adjust the stack pointer, and set up the call frame of a function. The next statement will likely involve emitting or normalizing a stack address."
GCC,riscv,566,"The next statement would likely involve performing some mathematical calculations using the results and variables from the previous statements in the code snippet. It may also involve branching based on certain conditions or calling other functions. As the code snippet is truncated, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without further context."
GCC,riscv,567,"if ()


pat = gen_rtx_fmt_e ( code , mode , op1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,568,"emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( op0 , pat ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,569,"scalable_frame . m = size . host_to_poly ( ) ; } else { scalable_frame . SCALE_IN = <NUM_LIT> ; }

frame -> fmask = ( frame -> fmask | frame -> mask ) ;"
GCC,riscv,570,"}
The next statement will check if the size is constant or not."
GCC,riscv,571,"}


*op1 = gen_rtx_SIGN_EXTEND ( eye_mode, *op1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,572,"if ( !riscv_mrelax && riscv_mcsr_check ) fprintf ( asm_out_file , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,riscv,573,"</s>'

The next statement is likely not to be predictable as it depends on the values of various parameters and variables within the code. However, the most likely next statement would be within one of the ""if"" or ""else if"" blocks."
GCC,riscv,574,"If TARGET_RVC is true and min_second_step is in the range [<NUM_LIT>, (TARGET_64BIT ? SDSP_REACH : SWSP_REACH)], then return the maximum of min_second_step and min_first_step; otherwise, if min_second_step is not a SMALL_OPERAND, return min_first_step."
GCC,riscv,575,"n ++ ; }

if (TREE_CODE(fields[n]) == FIELD_DECL || TREE_CODE(fields[n]) == ARRAY_TYPE) { return n; }"
GCC,riscv,576,"This code snippet predicts that the next statement will be ""riscv_save_restore_reg ( word_mode , regno , offset , fn ) ; } offset = ( cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset - sp_offset ) . to_constant ( ) ;"" which calls the function ""riscv_save_restore_reg"" with the variables ""word_mode"", ""regno"", ""offset"", and ""fn"" as parameters, followed by setting the variable ""offset"" to the result of the expression ""(cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant()""."
GCC,riscv,577,"The code will save or restore the RISC-V registers for the current function, depending on the given arguments."
GCC,riscv,578,gcc_unreachable ( )
GCC,riscv,579,"If none of the previous conditions are met, set the offset variable to the constant value of cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset."
GCC,riscv,580,The next statement is "if ( frame_pointer_needed )".
GCC,riscv,581,"if ( ! TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_ZDINX ) {
    if ( GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_FLOAT && GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_COMPLEX_FLOAT ) {
        if ( GET_MODE_UNIT_SIZE ( mode ) == GET_MODE_SIZE ( DFmode ) ) {
            if ( regno == VL_REGNUM || regno == VTYPE_REGNUM ) 
                return ( !(regno & nregs) );
            else 
                return false;
        } else if ( call_used_or_fixed_reg_p ( regno ) ) 
            return false;
        else
            return true;
    }"
GCC,riscv,582,else return true;
GCC,riscv,583,The next statement is "return (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode).to_constant() + UNITS_PER_WORD - <NUM_LIT>) / UNITS_PER_WORD;".
GCC,riscv,584,- return src - dest ;
GCC,riscv,585,"</s>

In the next statement, a new variable called ""from"" will be created and its value will be compared to the value stored in the variable ""FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM"". Depending on the result of the comparison, the value of the variable ""src"" will be assigned the value of the argument ""cfun->machine->frame.frame_pointer_offset""."
GCC,riscv,586,"set_optab_libfunc (gt_optab, HFmode, NULL);"
GCC,riscv,587,The code will return false.
GCC,riscv,588,"}

The next statement of this code snippet will be ""return true ;""."
GCC,riscv,589,"The next statement is ""reg = force_reg ( mode , src ) ;""."
GCC,riscv,590,"}


riscv_expand_op ( PLUS , mode , dest , dest , gen_int_mode ( constant , mode ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,591,"The next statement could be either ""riscv_expand_op ( LSHIFTRT , mode , tmp , tmp , gen_int_mode ( exact_log2 ( div_factor ) , QImode ) )"" or ""riscv_expand_mult_with_const_int ( mode , dest , tmp , factor / ( vlenb / div_factor ) )"". It depends on the value of div_factor."
GCC,riscv,592,"If set and riscv_split_64bit_move_p ( SET_DEST ( set ) , SET_SRC ( set ) ) is true, then might_split_p will be set to false."
GCC,riscv,593,"A possible next statement could be:

if (TYPE_SIZE(type) == <INT_LIT>) return <BOOL_LIT>;"
GCC,riscv,594,"<STR_LIT>

break;"
GCC,riscv,595,The next statement will be a closing curly brace to end the for loop.
GCC,riscv,596,"}

If (i >= <NUM_LIT> && i < num_ops) { if (!can_create_pseudo) x = riscv_emit_set(temp, x); else x = force_reg(mode, x); }"
GCC,riscv,597,return INVALID_REGNUM ;
GCC,riscv,598,"return <STR_LIT> ; case <NUM_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ; case <NUM_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ; } }

if (dest_code == MEM && width == <NUM_LIT>) {
  if (src_code == REG && GP_REG_P(REGNO(src))) {
    return <STR_LIT>;
  } else if (src_code == MEM) {
    return <STR_LIT>;
  }
}"
GCC,riscv,599,The next statement will be "else {".
GCC,riscv,600,"break ; }

asm_fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , lmul );"
GCC,riscv,601,cfun->machine->frame.fp_pc_offset = offset;
GCC,riscv,602,The next statement would be "return mode;".
GCC,riscv,603,return type;
GCC,riscv,604,"else return GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode )</s>

""endif"""
GCC,riscv,605,The next statement will be "else return 0;".
GCC,riscv,606,"</s>

The next statement could be: execute_machine_code();"
GCC,riscv,607,enable_machine_modes ( ) ;
GCC,riscv,608,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without context or more information about the code snippet. The next statement could be an if-else statement, a return statement, or a line of code calling a function."
GCC,riscv,609,"""end"""
GCC,riscv,610,"if ( mode == QImode ) 
    return true ; 
else 
    return default_scalar_mode_supported_p ( mode ) ;"
GCC,riscv,611,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the actual code or having more context about the intended purpose of the function. This function could potentially have multiple return statements or conditional statements that could alter the flow of execution.
GCC,riscv,612,"</s>

The next statement could be a closing bracket since the return statement is followed by a semicolon, indicating that the function definition has ended."
GCC,riscv,613,0
GCC,riscv,614,Require the no_rtl variable to be set to zero.
GCC,riscv,615,Variable "cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]" will be set to false for each value of "regno" in the range of GP_REG_FIRST to GP_REG_LAST.
GCC,riscv,616,"""Return true if the set of components is a subset of the GP register range."""
GCC,riscv,617,"next_slot_address = riscv_add_offset (scratch, stack_pointer_rtx, cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset.to_constant()) ;"
GCC,riscv,618,"</s>

""Return true if shamt is equal to the number of trailing zero bits in mask."""
GCC,riscv,619,"7712816468

Not enough information to predict."
GCC,riscv,620,riscv_finish_move ();
GCC,riscv,621,"This code snippet does not include any statements, it only defines different functions."
GCC,riscv,622,<NUM_LIT>
GCC,riscv,623,The next statement is "return true;"
GCC,riscv,624,"The next statement would be:
  
}"
GCC,riscv,625,The next statement will be "return true;".
GCC,riscv,626,It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context.
GCC,riscv,627,"if (min_size < 0) printf(""Error: Invalid size!"");
else printf(""Size is valid."");"
GCC,riscv,628,"</s>

The code will check if the variable TARGET_VECTOR is valid and if it is, it will call the function riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p with the argument mode."
GCC,riscv,629,"None


The function will return 'mode_size'."
GCC,riscv,630,"}
""return BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR"""
GCC,riscv,631,"if(riscv_vector_chunks * scale >= 0) 
    return ""The next statement would be a return statement returning the value of the condition check."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,632,return riscv_v_vector_chunks * scale;
GCC,riscv,633,"return riscv_v_precision_adjusted(mode, scale);"
GCC,riscv,634,TRUE
GCC,riscv,635,true.
GCC,riscv,636,"<e>

<s> return false; <e>"
GCC,riscv,637,"setState(State . IDLE )

The next statement could be another case or default statement, or the end of the switch statement."
GCC,riscv,638,"}
{
  RETURN_ZEROED_HARD_REGS;
}"
GCC,riscv,639,"Since there is no conditional statement that could alter the flow of the code, the next statement will be the return statement, with the value being a combination of the zeroed_hardregs variable and the result of the default_zero_call_used_regs function being called with the need_zeroed_hardregs and negation of zeroed_hardregs as arguments."
GCC,riscv,640,The code will generate an rtx for the virtual register vl_regno which will use the Pmode and the target machine mode.
GCC,riscv,641,if (need
GCC,riscv,642,"The function ""riscv_address_cost"" returns the cost of accessing an address in the RISC-V architecture, given the address, machine mode, address space, and speed of access."
GCC,riscv,643,The next statement will likely involve the variable "n" and will likely use the functions GET_MODE_SIZE and UNITS_PER_WORD. It will also involve some arithmetic operations.
GCC,riscv,644,The next statement would be to assign a value to the variable 'n' using the NUM_LIT constant.
GCC,riscv,645,None; the code snippet is already complete.
GCC,riscv,646,"""The function then iterates through the general-purpose registers and allocates a reg note with a REG_CFA_RESTORE of each register's value to the dwarf variable."""
GCC,riscv,647,"rtx frame_address = gen_rtx_FRAME_ADDR (dwarf, adjust_sp_rtx, reg, saved_size);"
GCC,riscv,648,"adjust_sp_rtx = gen_rtx_PLUS ( SImode , </s>

gen_rtx_REG (SImode, regno)"
GCC,riscv,649,"""Return the argument information for the given cumulative argument, in the specified mode and type, as a named value."""
GCC,riscv,650,arg = 0; //Sets the value of the "arg" variable to 0.
GCC,riscv,651,"}</s>

The next statement could potentially be ""return codes, cost"" depending on what the function is meant to return. Or, if the function is part of a larger loop, the next statement could be another iteration of the loop."
GCC,riscv,652,alt_codes [ alt_cost - <NUM_LIT> ] . code = ASHIFT ;
GCC,riscv,653,if (flag_pic) return true;
GCC,riscv,654,The next statement is: default : break ;
GCC,riscv,655,"} else { * code = LT ; * cmp1 = force_reg ( mode , GEN_INT ( plus_one ) ) ; }</s>

Default is LT case."
GCC,riscv,656,"}

false"
GCC,riscv,657,"""The next case statement is a PLUS, and it assigns the type as ADDRESS_REG, the reg to be the value of x, and the offset to be the value of x."""
GCC,riscv,658,The next statement would be: info->const = const0_rtx;
GCC,riscv,659,"<s>

The next statement is ""else return riscv_hard_regno_nregs (FP_REG_FIRST, mode) ;"""
GCC,riscv,660,""" frame -> return_address_offset = offset ;"""
GCC,riscv,661,"EXTRA_ARGS = & un

used_fpregset</s>

CONDITIONAL = TRUE;"
GCC,riscv,662,The code will return the section "sdata_section" if s is equal to "data_section" or it will return s itself.
GCC,riscv,663,"* code = EQ ;
* op0 = riscv_force_binary (word_mode, EQ, cmp_op0, cmp_op1);
* op1 = const0_rtx;
break;"
GCC,riscv,664,"The code snippet is likely part of a larger function, so the next statement could vary depending on the context. However, based on the current structure, the next statement is likely: ""}"" (which marks the end of this block of code)"
GCC,riscv,665,step1 += step2 ;
GCC,riscv,666,0
GCC,riscv,667,"The next statement would likely be another operation involving the generated instruction from the previous statement, such as storing the result in a register or using it in an arithmetic operation. It could also involve assigning a value to a variable or making a conditional statement based on the size being greater than a certain number."
GCC,riscv,668,"}


} else if ( SIGN_EXTEND_OPERAND ( GET_MODE ( * op0 ), word_mode ) ) {
	* op0 = gen_rtx_SIGN_EXTEND ( word_mode, * op0 );
	if (CONST_INT_P (*op1))
		* op1 = GEN_INT ((uint8_t) INTVAL (*op1));
	else
		* op1 = gen_rtx_SIGN_EXTEND (word_mode, * op1);
}"
GCC,riscv,669,"}}
 The code at <s> wants to compare two operands in order to determine control flow."
GCC,riscv,670,It is impossible to predict the next statement as it depends on the specific code present in the default_file_start function.
GCC,riscv,671,"}

static void riscv_exception_handler

static void riscv_exception_handler ( ) ;"
GCC,riscv,672,"The code will check if the frame total size is not a small operand and if it is divisible by a specific number. If it meets these conditions, the function will return the remainder of the frame total size divided by that specific number. However, before returning, it will also assert that the minimum first step is less than or equal to the maximum first step."
GCC,riscv,673,"</UNK>


The next statement is likely to call the function ""riscv_flatten_aggregate_field"" and pass in the parameters ""type"", ""fields"", and two numerical values."
GCC,riscv,674,"return riscv_flatten_aggregate_field (type, fields, <NUM_LIT>, <NUM_LIT+1>);"
GCC,riscv,675,"The next statement is:

fields[0].type = TREE_TYPE(type);"
GCC,riscv,676,"The next statement will check if n is less than a numerical literal and if it is, it will check if the type is a scalar float or integral type with a size smaller than or equal to UNITS_PER_FP_ARG or UNITS_PER_WORD. If all these conditions are met, it will return n. Otherwise, it will return -1."
GCC,riscv,677,return x;
GCC,riscv,678,"if (mode == MODE_INT)
    return gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mode, x, y);"
GCC,riscv,679,"If the previous statement returned a temporary register, the function would emit a move instruction to move the value into the destination register and then return the destination register."
GCC,riscv,680,The code will return the destination variable.
GCC,riscv,681,"<EOH>

If there is an error in the code that stops compilation."
GCC,riscv,682,"The code will return the function ""riscv_get_arg_info"" and pass it the arguments ""info"", ""cum"", ""mode"", ""type"", ""named"", and ""false""."
GCC,riscv,683,"""This code snippet returns the result of riscv_get_arg_info with the given arguments if the mode variable is not set to VOIDmode."""
GCC,riscv,684,"None, as there is no further code after this statement."
GCC,riscv,685,"</s>

 The next statement will be a closing bracket to end the function block."
GCC,riscv,686,args will be initialized with a numerical value.
GCC,riscv,687,"(""unsigned_p"")

unsigned_p 



= TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);"
GCC,riscv,688,"return gen_rtx_COMPLEX ( mode , gen_rtx_REG ( TYPE_MODE ( TYPE_SIZE_UNIT ( mode ) ) , fregno ) , gen_rtx_REG ( TYPE_MODE ( TYPE_SIZE_UNIT ( mode ) ) , fregno + <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; default : return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , fregno ) ; }


The next statement is a ""break"" statement."
GCC,riscv,689,"return riscv_pass_fpr_single (mode, fregno, TYPE_MODE(fields[0].type));"
GCC,riscv,690,"""} else if ( FP_REG_P ( regno ) ) { if ( ! FP_REG_P ( regno + nregs - 1 ) ) return false ; if ( GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_FLOAT && GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_COMPLEX_FLOAT ) return false ; if ( GET_MODE_UNIT_SIZE ( mode ) > UNITS_PER_FP_REG || ( ! call_used_regs [ regno ] && GET_MODE_UNIT_SIZE ( mode ) > UNITS_PER_FP_ARG ) ) return false ; """
GCC,riscv,691,"}
The code will check if the next register after ""regno + nregs"" is within the range of general purpose or floating point registers, and if not, it will return false."
GCC,riscv,692,NUM_LIT+1
GCC,riscv,693,The next statement is "cfun -> machine -> is_leaf = leaf_function_p ( );"
GCC,riscv,694,"bool op0_valid = ((rtx_equal_p (GEN_INT (1) ,

if (addr.base != NULL) {
  if (op0_valid) {
    if (strict_p) {
      return true;
    } else return (addr.mode != mode);
  } else return false;
} else return false;"
GCC,riscv,695,"</s>

Based on the snippet, we cannot accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the context and purpose of the code. The next statement could be initializing the variables, declaring a function, or any other action related to the structure ""addr""."
GCC,riscv,696,"The next statement would check if the code of x is a PLUS and if the code of its first operand is a CONST_INT_P, and if the value of the first operand is not equal to <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,riscv,697,"split_jump (split_dest, split_src, &jump_dest, &jump_src, CONST_INT (offset));"
GCC,riscv,698,} return true;
GCC,riscv,699,"return false ; }

if ( CONSTANT_P ( src ) && move_operand ( src , mode ) ) {
  riscv_emit_move ( dest , src ) ;
  return true ;
}"
GCC,riscv,700,"""else if ( GET_MODE_BITSIZE ( mode ) == <NUM_LIT> ) { set = single_set ( insn ) ; if ( !set || riscv_split_64bit_move_p ( SET_DEST ( set ) , SET_SRC ( set ) ) ) might_split_p = true ; }"""
GCC,riscv,701,"The next statement will return the result of the function call riscv_address_insns on the arguments XEXP (mem, <NUM_LIT>) and mode, with the variable might_split_p passed in as an argument."
GCC,riscv,702,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or additional information.
GCC,riscv,703,"}}
 ""If num_ops is greater than or equal to the cost of splitting an integer for the given value, x will be set to the result of splitting the integer. Otherwise, x will be set to the corresponding GEN_INT value from the code array. If x cannot be created as a pseudo, it will be emitted as a set operation with the temporary value as the source."""
GCC,riscv,704,"}


In the next statement, the code will check if the variable x can be set as a pseudo-register, and if it cannot, it will be set as a temporary variable using the ""riscv_emit_set"" function. Otherwise, it will be forced to be set as a specific register according to the specified mode, using the ""force_reg"" function."
GCC,riscv,705,"If UNITS_PER_FP_ARG is greater than UNITS_PER_FP_REG and BITS_PER_WORD is not equal to POINTER_SIZE, an error will be thrown with a message stating the difference between UNITS_PER_FP_ARG and UNITS_PER_FP_REG, and the value of POINTER_SIZE."
GCC,riscv,706,"""If BITS_PER_WORD is not equal to POINTER_SIZE, an error will be thrown with the message 'Pointer size is incorrect'."""
GCC,riscv,707,The next statement would be: "return emit_insn (gen_pre_dec_insn (this_rtx));"
GCC,riscv,708,"""This code will return the riscv_cpu_info_table, because the if statement will evaluate to false and the error function will not be executed."""
GCC,riscv,709,"}

riscv_parse_cpu will loop through riscv_cpu_info_table and return the entry that matches the cpu_string."
GCC,riscv,710,"I < n ; i ++

fields[i] becomes the next element in the loop"
GCC,riscv,711,"""This code snippet is creating a new variable n and assigning it the flattened aggregate argument using the RISC-V instruction set. It then iterates through all values of i from 0 to n, checking if the type of each field is a scalar float type. If not, it will return 0. If all fields have a scalar float type, it will return the value of n or 1 if n is greater than 0."""
GCC,riscv,712,"</s>

} else { return; }"
GCC,riscv,713,info.cummulative_args = cum;
GCC,riscv,714,I cannot predict the next statement of this code snippet without seeing the context and the values of the variables.
GCC,riscv,715,"return ""return std::make_pair(mode, std::make_pair(regno1, offset1))"";"
GCC,riscv,716,Error: Missing return statement
GCC,riscv,717,"}

NULL"
GCC,riscv,718,The next statement to be executed would be: "else return;" following the default case.
GCC,riscv,719,"else output_operand ( op , <NUM_LIT> , file ) ;</s>

The next statement could be the end of the current switch statement or the end of the code snippet."
GCC,riscv,720,gcc_unreachable ( ) ;
GCC,riscv,721,The code snippet does not contain enough information to determine the next statement.
GCC,riscv,722,It is impossible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code. Please provide more context for accurate prediction.
GCC,riscv,723,0
GCC,riscv,724,<UNK>
GCC,riscv,725,if (not call_saved) return false;
GCC,riscv,726,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet will most likely be an ""else"" statement that returns false, as it is the only remaining possibility within the given conditions."
GCC,riscv,727,"The next statement might be: 
if (mode == VOIDmode) { fn (regno, mem); }"
GCC,riscv,728,"return_emit <NUM_LIT> }
1"
GCC,riscv,729,gcc_unreachable();
GCC,riscv,730,seqno ++;
GCC,riscv,731,There is a possibility that the code will reach this point without any conditions being met.
GCC,riscv,732,The next statement could be a return statement that simplifies a subregister using the specified modes and bytes.
GCC,riscv,733,return temp;
GCC,riscv,734,The next statement could be an "else" statement or a closing curly brace to end the "if" statement.
GCC,riscv,735,"return riscv_operand_byte_rtx ( mode ) != 0 ;

It is likely that the statement will be a conditional return statement, checking if riscv_operand_byte_rtx (mode) is not equal to 0."
GCC,riscv,736,return n;
GCC,riscv,737,"""The next statement will return a value based on the number of general purpose registers multiplied by a constant value called UNITS_PER_WORD."""
GCC,riscv,738,"The next statement could be a declaration of a variable using the struct, such as ""arg.registers = 5;"""
GCC,riscv,739,"regs = (rtx *) alloca (mode.unit_size () * NUM_LIT)

delta = src mem_offset (mode) ;
offset = dest mem_offset (mode);
for (i = 0; i < mode.unit_size(); i++) {
  regs[i] = gen_rtx_MEM (mode, dest + offset + delta);
}"
GCC,riscv,740,"break or H::
break or H::"
GCC,riscv,741,"The next statement would be:

switch (GET_CODE (x)) {"
GCC,riscv,742,">

RISCV_STACK_ALIGN ( num_args * UNITS_PER_WORD );"
GCC,riscv,743,"The next statement would be the end of the if statement, followed by the end of the for loop."
GCC,riscv,744,"</s>

The next statement will check if the tree code of the current expression is either STRING_CST or CONSTRUCTOR. If it is, the return value will be the maximum of the given alignment value and the number of bits per word. Otherwise, the return value will be the same as the given alignment value."
GCC,riscv,745,"}

None. The code snippet has reached the end."
GCC,riscv,746,"}

The next statement is: ""if ( SMALL_OPERAND ( - size ) ) { insn = gen_add3_insn ( stack_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx , GEN_INT ( - size ) ) ; RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( emit_insn ( insn ) ) = <NUM_LIT> ; } else { riscv_emit_move ( RISCV_PROLOGUE_TEMP ( Pmode ) , GEN_INT ( - size ) ) ; emit_insn ( gen_add3_insn ( stack_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx , RISCV_PROLOGUE_TEMP ( Pmode ) ) ) ; }"""
GCC,riscv,747,The next statement will print the value of a variable to an output file using a ternary conditional operator.
GCC,riscv,748,"}
There is no next statement as the code snippet ends after the opening curly brace."
GCC,riscv,749,"</s>

This statement will potentially update the value of ""offset"" by subtracting the value of UNITS_PER_WORD from it, after which the ""offset"" value will be set to the difference between ""cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset"" and ""sp_offset""."
GCC,riscv,750,The next statement will assign the result of the riscv_get_arg_info function to a variable or use it for some other operation.
GCC,riscv,751,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,752,<s> const char *arg_name = info.name;
GCC,riscv,753,"else return (cfun->machine->cpu->pc == &mcount_exec);
Explanation:

The next statement would be an ""else"" statement, followed by the condition (cfun->machine->cpu->pc == &mcount_exec). This statement would be executed if both the previous if statements evaluate to false."
GCC,riscv,754,"}

The prediction is ""return true;"""
GCC,riscv,755,info -> stack_p = (num_words - info -> num_gprs) != 0;
GCC,riscv,756,"""return false;"""
GCC,riscv,757,"if (MEM_P (x)) {
    return force_reg (mode, x); }"
GCC,riscv,758,"if ( offset != const0_rtx && (targetm.cannot_force_const_mem(mode,src) || can_create_pseudo_p())) {
<tab> base = riscv_force_temporary (dest, base);
} else {
<tabriscv_emit_move (dest, base);
}"
GCC,riscv,759,"The next statement will be: ""riscv_emit_move ( dest , src ) ;"""
GCC,riscv,760,The next statement is a closing curly brace "}".
GCC,riscv,761,This function returns false.
GCC,riscv,762,"}

Something to continue executing the code."
GCC,riscv,763,"</s>

}"
GCC,riscv,764,"if ( BITS_PER_WORD == <NUM_LIT> ) { min += SLOW_HUGE_POINTER_SHIFT_UNSIGNED ; max += SLOW_HUGE_POINTER_SHIFT_UNSIGNED ; riscv_stack_boundary_code = riscv_stack_boundary ; }ELSEWHERE ( target_flags_explicit & MASK_IFUNC ) )

riscv_prologue_delay_slot = 1;"
GCC,riscv,765,"Another <s> return statement will be executed for either case <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , or <NUM_LIT> , depending on the value returned by GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)."
GCC,riscv,766,"case <NUM_LIT>:

The next statement could be a return statement with a string literal as the value."
GCC,riscv,767,"""This code checks if the variable 'cum' is not equal to NULL. If it is not NULL, it calls the function 'riscv_get_arg_info' with parameters 'info', 'cum', 'mode', 'type', 'named', and 'false'. If 'num_fprs' in 'info' is not equal to 0, it returns false. Then, it checks if 'size' is not within the range of <NUM_LIT> and <NUM_LIT> multiplied by UNITS_PER_WORD and returns the opposite value."""
GCC,riscv,768,The next statement would likely involve using the variables 'x' and/or 'const0_rtx' in some sort of operation or calculation.
GCC,riscv,769,"""cfun -> machine -> varargs_size = (MAX_ARGS_IN_REGISTERS - local_cum . num_gprs)*UNITS_PER_WORD"""
GCC,riscv,770,"</s>

""Error: Missing condition in if statement"""
GCC,riscv,771,"</s>

The code snippet does not have any further statements and ends with a return statement."
GCC,riscv,772,"riscv_move_integer (hi, hi, hival) ;"
GCC,riscv,773,"lo = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (CONST_INT, mode, lo, GEN_INT(<NUM_LIT>));"
GCC,riscv,774,"return temp ;

The next statement would be: return temp;"
GCC,riscv,775,"This code snippet is likely checking some sort of condition or requirement and returning a boolean value based on the outcome. It is possible that the next statement could be some sort of error handling or logging statement, or it could likely be the end of the code block."
GCC,riscv,776,n += ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) + UNITS_PER_WORD - <NUM_LIT> ) / UNITS_PER_WORD ;
GCC,riscv,777,"return false ; }

If the input regno is equal to RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM, the function will return true, otherwise it will return false. The function is checking if the register number is used in the riscv epilogue."
GCC,riscv,778,"<e>

return call_saved && !might_clobber;"
GCC,riscv,779,"The next statement is:
default:"
GCC,riscv,780,"""<NUM_LIT> + 1"""
GCC,riscv,781,The next statement is: return n;
GCC,riscv,782,"""Return the calculated high value using the specified temporary variable and the given offset."""
GCC,riscv,783,"reg = riscv_force_temporary (temp, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, offset, reg), FALSE); // The high variable has been reassigned to the result of forced temporary value of temp, and the reg variable has been reassigned to the forced temporary value of the generated PLUS expression using Pmode, offset, and the original reg value."
GCC,riscv,784,"loop_reg = copy_addr_to_reg ( XEXP ( mem , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,785,"}

Closing curly brace for the ""if"" statement."
GCC,riscv,786,"}

The next statement is a closing curly brace ""}""."
GCC,riscv,787,"This code snippet is calculating and saving the offset of each General Purpose Register (GPR) into the current function's frame, based on the saved_size and various constant values. It then generates a note for each GPR's offset and adjust the stack pointer accordingly."
GCC,riscv,788,<NUM_LIT +1 >
GCC,riscv,789,The next statement will be "}" indicating the end of the function.
GCC,riscv,790,"The next statement might be:
if (riscv_allocate_stack_slots_for_args()) {
  // Do something
} else {
  // Do something else
}"
GCC,riscv,791,"""The next statement will check if the arg variable has a stack pointer, and if it does, it will multiply the number of general purpose registers (num_gprs) by the specified value (UNITS_PER_WORD)."""
GCC,riscv,792,"}</s>

HOST_WIDE_INT_2"
GCC,riscv,793,"I'm sorry, there is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement. Please provide the full code snippet for a more accurate prediction."
GCC,riscv,794,"if (single_insns == double_insns) {
  return COSTS_N_INSNS(double_insns);
}"
GCC,riscv,795,"riscv_adjust_block_mem( dest, bytes_per_iter, &dest_reg, &dest );"
GCC,riscv,796,"} }

The next statement will be: 
for ( offset = delta, i =0 ; offset + delta <= length ; offset += delta, i++ ) {
    set_mem_ref (regs[i], dest, offset, mode);
}"
GCC,riscv,797,"} </s>

The next statement could be a conditional statement checking if the offset value is less than the length."
GCC,riscv,798,"""The new cost for alt_codes will be assigned to the variable named alt_cost."""
GCC,riscv,799,"alt_codes [ alt_cost - <NUM_LIT> ] . value = low_part ; memcpy ( codes , alt_codes , sizeof ( alt_codes ) ) ; cost = alt_cost ; } }

return <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,riscv,800,"""RTL_CONST_CALL_P ( insn ) : result = 1 ; start_sequence2 ( ) ;"""
GCC,riscv,801,"<s> emit_insn ( riscv_set_tls_offset_reg ( const0_rtx , sym , a0 ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,802,"The next statement will likely involve a conditional statement using the result of the function recog_memoized and calling the function get_attr_cannot_copy. It could possibly be something like:

if (recog_memoized(insn) >= <NUM_LIT>) {
    get_attr_cannot_copy(insn);
    // do something
}"
GCC,riscv,803,"The next statement of this code snippet could be a conditional statement, such as ""if (base == 0) { ... }"" or ""if (offset < 10) { ... }"", or it could be a return statement, possibly with a boolean value to indicate true or false."
GCC,riscv,804,"if (plus_one == <NUM_LIT>) {
    return false;
}"
GCC,riscv,805,The next statement will be another conditional statement checking if the value of plus_one is equal to <NUM_LIT>.
GCC,riscv,806,return true;
GCC,riscv,807,The statement will check if there is an intersection between the FP_REGS and rclass reg class.
GCC,riscv,808,"</s>

</s> The function will return true if the 'to' parameter is either equal to HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM or STACK_POINTER_REGNUM"
GCC,riscv,809,A return statement will be used in this code snippet.
GCC,riscv,810,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is no code snippet provided."
GCC,riscv,811,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of the variables involved in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,812,return riscv_classify_symbol(offset)
GCC,riscv,813,"if (rclass

00

== NO_REGS) return 0; else if (rclass == GENERAL_REGS) return 32; else if (rclass == FP_REGS) return 32; else return 0; }"
GCC,riscv,814,return true
GCC,riscv,815,"""if the condition is met, return true; otherwise, return false."""
GCC,riscv,816,The code will check if the variable x is within the range of the CSW_MAX_OFFSET and then return the result of that check.
GCC,riscv,817,"If the machine has support for interrupts, the code snippet will add a offset to the current stack size and save the frame pointer, hard frame pointer, floating-point save area, and general-purpose save area."
GCC,riscv,818,fixed_regs[regno] = call_used_regs[regno] = NUM_LIT;
GCC,riscv,819,return x;
GCC,riscv,820,The next statement will be "if ( s == bss_section ) return sbss_section ;"
GCC,riscv,821,"strcpy ( name , s -> named . name ) ;"
GCC,riscv,822,"</s>

""TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN is true, so <NUM_LIT> will be printed."""
GCC,riscv,823,"This code snippet is a switch statement that handles different comparison cases. The next statement will be to set the code to EQ and then perform the comparison by calling the function riscv_force_binary, passing in the word mode, fp_code, and the two operands cmp_op0 and cmp_op1. The result of the comparison will be stored in the *op0 variable and the *op1 variable will be set to a constant 0 value. The break statement will then end the switch statement."
GCC,riscv,824,The next statement will check if invert_ptr is equal to <NUM_LIT>.
GCC,riscv,825,"This code snippet seems to be part of a function definition for an instruction that moves data from one location to another. Based on the conditional statement, the next statement could either be a call to the emit_move_insn function or the emit_move_insn_1 function, depending on the result of the can_create_pseudo_p() function."
GCC,riscv,826,"emit_move_insn_1(dest, src)"
GCC,riscv,827,The next statement is likely to be the declaration of a variable or the initialisation of a value.
GCC,riscv,828,"}</s>

The next statement will be a conditional statement using the ""else if"" statement, with the condition being that Pmode does not equal SImode."
GCC,riscv,829,This code snippet does not have a return statement and can continue with additional code.
GCC,riscv,830,"}</s>

""If no conditions are met, return false."""
GCC,riscv,831,The code snippet will return false.
GCC,riscv,832,"</s>

This code snippet defines a function that expands a conditional branch for the riscv architecture. The next statement is assigning the return value of the gen_rtx_fmt_ee() function to the variable ""condition""."
GCC,riscv,833,It is likely that the next statement will be a return statement specifying a value or expression to be returned.
GCC,riscv,834,"riscv_emit_stack_tie ( ) ; need_barrier_p = false ; step2 = - step2 ;

riscv_emit_stack_tie (); need_barrier_p = false; step2 = -step2;"
GCC,riscv,835,"riscv_expand_float_scc will call riscv_emit_float_compare with the parameters code, op0, and op1."
GCC,riscv,836,"The code snippet will create a comparison statement for two operands, convert it to a binary operation, and then set a target variable to the result of subtracting the lowpart of the subregister in SImode from the word_mode."
GCC,riscv,837,"riscv_emit_int_order_test ( code , zi<NUM_LIT> , target , op0 , op1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,838,"}
 
The next statement is ""return zie;"""
GCC,riscv,839,RT
GCC,riscv,840,"}
<s>
HOST_WIDE_INT step2 = frame->mask & frame->fmask;"
GCC,riscv,841,"*op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op0); if(CONST_INT_P(*op1)) *op1 = GEN_INT((uint16_t)INTVAL(*op1)); else *op1 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op1);"
GCC,riscv,842,"In this statement, the code checks if the mode size of word_mode is greater than the mode size of op0, and if so, checks if the unsigned condition of code is equal to code and if the mode of op0 is QImode and if op0 is not a SUBREG with a promoted variable and promoted signed value and if op1 is either a CONST_INT or a SUBREG with a promoted variable and promoted signed value. If all of these conditions are true, then op0 is set to a zero-extended version of word_mode and op1 is set to a zero-extended version of word_mode or a"
GCC,riscv,843,"if (TARGET_ZBB) {
  if (!unsigned_p && GET_MODE (op) == QImode) return COSTS_N_INSNS (<NUM_LIT>);
  if (GET_MODE (op) == HImode) return COSTS_N_INSNS (<NUM_LIT>);
}"
GCC,riscv,844,"else if ( ! unsigned_p && GET_MODE ( op ) == HImode ) return COSTS_N_INSNS ( <NUM_LIT> ) }</s>


No statement will be executed, as all the conditions will result in false."
GCC,riscv,845,The next statement of this code snippet could possibly be another fprintf statement.
GCC,riscv,846,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context about the variables and functions used in the code snippet.
GCC,riscv,847,"</s>

""The type is not a record type, thus the result is a number literal."""
GCC,riscv,848,"type ? Ser


This code snippet likely continues to define a function that flattens an aggregate argument for a RISC-V processor. The function takes in a ""type"" parameter, potentially referring to a data type, as well as an array of ""riscv_aggregate_field"" objects and a boolean variable. The function then checks if the type is valid and if it is not a record type, the function returns -1. Otherwise, the function may go on to perform further actions."
GCC,riscv,849,"fields [ <NUM_LIT> ] . offset = offset ; fields [ <NUM_LIT> ] . type = TREE_TYPE ( type ) ; fields [ <NUM_LIT> ] . offset = offset ; n ++ ; }

The next statement would return n."
GCC,riscv,850,"The function will return variable x after checking if it is a legitimate RISC-V address, and if not, it will be forced into a register of type Pmode."
GCC,riscv,851,"return force_reg (mode, code, x, y);"
GCC,riscv,852,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code being executed.
GCC,riscv,853,offset = cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset - sp_offset - UNITS_PER_WORD
GCC,riscv,854,execute set instruction using the values from memory and register
GCC,riscv,855,"The next statement is a ""return"" statement that calls the ""riscv_get_arg_info"" function with the ""info"" struct, the ""cum"" variable, and various arguments."
GCC,riscv,856,return arg.name;
GCC,riscv,857,"//This statement would likely involve using the information retrieved from the riscv_get_arg_info function, possibly to perform some sort of operation or manipulation. For example:

arg_info = info;
//Setting a new variable equal to the retrieved information from the riscv_get_arg_info function."
GCC,riscv,858,"This code snippet is not specified for a programming language, so it is impossible to predict the next statement. Some possibilities could be: 
- Another function call or variable assignment using the information obtained from riscv_get_arg_info. 
- A conditional statement using the information obtained from riscv_get_arg_info. 
- A loop iterating over multiple arguments. 
- An error handling statement in case riscv_get_arg_info returns an error."
GCC,riscv,859,"= galign

galign = CHECK_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode)"
GCC,riscv,860,return false;
GCC,riscv,861,"memcpy(&args, <NUM_LIT>, sizeof args);"
GCC,riscv,862,"return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , fregno + <NUM_LIT> ) ;

The next statement would be another ""case"" statement, followed by a return statement, or a gcc_unreachable() function call."
GCC,riscv,863,"return riscv_pass_fpr_scalar ( mode , fregno ,  )

return riscv_pass_fpr_scalar ( mode , fregno , TYPE_MODE ( fields [ 0 ] . type ) , fields [ 0 ] . offset ) ;"
GCC,riscv,864,The next statement is "else return UNKNOWN_MODE."
GCC,riscv,865,"}

currency

The code snippet returns the value MACHINE_MODE."
GCC,riscv,866,"<\s>

  if ( Pmode == SImode ) return gen_got_load_tls_gdti ( dest , sym ) ;"
GCC,riscv,867,"If the Pmode is not equal to DImode, it will return the result of the function gen_got_load_tls_gddi with the parameters dest and sym."
GCC,riscv,868,"aller(""New"")

return gen_got_load_tls_iegdu (dest, sym);"
GCC,riscv,869,"</s>

""If Pmode and DImode are not equal, return gen_got_load_tls_iedi with the arguments dest and sym."""
GCC,riscv,870,return gpr_save_reg_order[(unsigned)REGNO (elt)];
GCC,riscv,871,8
GCC,riscv,872,"}

<NUM_LIT> 1"
GCC,riscv,873,"return LGENE<NUM_LIT>

case GTU : return SMALL_OPERAND ( x + <NUM_LIT> + 1 ) ;"
GCC,riscv,874,"else gcc_unreachable( )

else gcc_unreachable( );"
GCC,riscv,875,"The next statement could be to initialize a new instance of the struct machine_function, as designated by the static keyword."
GCC,riscv,876,The function will return the minimum value between riscv_build_integer and riscv_split_integer_cost when called with the given parameters.
GCC,riscv,877,"The next statement will likely be a return statement, as the current statement is followed by a semicolon."
GCC,riscv,878,"I'm sorry, I cannot make predictions on code snippets without proper context or more information about the function. Please provide more details for me to give a more accurate response."
GCC,riscv,879,FALSE
GCC,riscv,880,return cmp1 == const1_rtx ;
GCC,riscv,881,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without more context. However, based on the current code snippet, the next statement will most likely involve comparing the value of ""sec"" (the section name) to another string or number. Perhaps it will involve checking if the section name is equal to a specific value or if it meets certain criteria."
GCC,riscv,882,"<s>

""return riscv_align_ok_for_small_data_p ( int_size_in_bytes (TREE_TYPE ( x ) ) );"""
GCC,riscv,883,The function will return an integer representing the issue rate of the RISC-V processor.
GCC,riscv,884,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the exact statement as it depends on the inputs provided to the function riscv_classify_address. However, the statement will likely involve returning a value that has been classified based on the provided address, x value, mode and strict_p flag."
GCC,riscv,885,return (riscv_constant_address_p(x) || riscv_stack_pointer_address_p(x) || riscv_control_register_address_p(x));
GCC,riscv,886,"""The function will return true if the number of RISC-V constant instructions in x is greater than <NUM_LIT>, and false otherwise."""
GCC,riscv,887,"if ( GET_MODE ( x ) != CCmode && x > 0 ) { return true; } return false;

""The function will return true if the machine mode is not CCmode and the value of x is greater than 0."""
GCC,riscv,888,"return riscv_legitimize_address ( addr </s>


if (optimize_function_for_size_p(cfun) && (strcmp(current_pass->name, ""optimize-size"") == 0) && mode == SImode) addr = riscv_optimize_size_lw_offset(base, offset); else if (optimize_function_for_speed_p(cfun) && (strcmp(current_pass->name, ""optimize-speed"") == 0) && mode == SImode) addr = riscv_optimize_speed_lw_offset(base, offset); else return riscv_legitimize_address(addr);"
GCC,riscv,889,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and purpose of the code. The code could continue with more statements inside the current function or it could return to the calling function.
GCC,riscv,890,return false;
GCC,riscv,891,"Predict the next statement: split_const ( src , & base, & offset )"
GCC,riscv,892,assign dest to the result of a gen_add3_insn operation using tmp and tp as operands and then exit the switch statement.
GCC,riscv,893,"emit_insn ( gen_add3_insn

(dest, tmp, riscv_tls_symbol (loc)))"
GCC,riscv,894,"Here, the next statement would likely be a closing curly brace `}` to end the `else if` statement."
GCC,riscv,895,The next statement will return false.
GCC,riscv,896,The program will return false due to the default case being reached.
GCC,riscv,897,The next statement will be "default : gcc_unreachable ( ) ;"
GCC,riscv,898,"return false

}

The next statement will likely be the end curly brace and semicolon to close the switch statement and the function."
GCC,riscv,899,"</s>

""The return statement calculates the memory cost based on the machine mode, register class, and boolean parameter and adds it to the secondary cost of the memory move before returning the total cost."""
GCC,riscv,900,"}


The code snippet will return the ""combined_attrs"" tree, which contains the merged attributes of the old and new declarations."
GCC,riscv,901,The next statement will be "return combined_attrs;".
GCC,riscv,902,"</s> This code snippet checks if mode1 and mode2 are equal or if both mode1 and mode2 are not of class MODE_FLOAT, and then returns this comparison as a boolean value."
GCC,riscv,903,"if ( mode1 == mode2 ) <e>

{return true}"
GCC,riscv,904,"else x = riscv_emit_set ( mode , x ) ;

This piece of code will set the variable x to the result of calling the function riscv_emit_set with the input parameters mode and x."
GCC,riscv,905,The code snippet checks if the function declaration has a specific attribute.
GCC,riscv,906,"""return new_cost < old_cost;"""
GCC,riscv,907,"""if (speed) { /* code optimized for speed */ } else { /* code optimized for size */ }"""
GCC,riscv,908,"For the next statement, there will be an error message printed with the string literal ""Invalid stack protector guard register: "", followed by the value of the string variable ""riscv_stack_protector_guard_reg_str"" and an additional string literal explaining the error."
GCC,riscv,909,"""Return the saved libcall count for RISC-V architecture."""
GCC,riscv,910,The next statement is likely to check if the value of 'bytes' is smaller than the size of 's'.
GCC,riscv,911,"predict
 gen_rtx_SET ( temp2 , gen_rtx_MEM ( Pmode , rtx_fmt ( SYMBOL_REF , ??? )"
GCC,riscv,912,The next statement would be to set the value of SIBLING_CALL_P for the instruction 'insn' to the literal number.
GCC,riscv,913,"case 4 : return <STR_LIT> ; case 8 : return <STR_LIT> ; default : abort ( ) ; }

The next statement could be ""abort();"" or a statement from the switch case on dest_code and GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)."
GCC,riscv,914,"}

""returning <STR_LIT>"""
GCC,riscv,915,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without more context or information about the code."
GCC,riscv,916,"</s>

The next statement would likely be a return statement that returns the tune_string variable as the result of the function."
GCC,riscv,917,"}

The next statement would be to compare the number of integrals and floats between the old and new fields."
GCC,riscv,918,"The warning function is called with the arguments OPT_Wpsabi, a string literal, and the variable 'warned'."
GCC,riscv,919,The code will return false if the info.num_fprs variable is not equal to 0.
GCC,riscv,920,"The next statement will likely involve a conditional statement following the ""if"" keyword, potentially involving the num_fprs variable."
GCC,riscv,921,"<s>
The code will return a parallel operation with two expression lists, each containing a register and an integer offset."
GCC,riscv,922,The next statement would likely be a return statement that returns the variable x.
GCC,riscv,923,"}

} else {
  x = gen_rtx_STMT_LIST ( VOIDmode, x );
} 

The next statement of this code snippet would be:

}"
GCC,riscv,924,"return <NUM_LIT> ;

NUM_LIT: 1"
GCC,riscv,925,"output_addr_const ( file , newop )

The next statement could potentially be a new ""case"" statement starting with the letter ""X"". However, since the snippet does not provide any information on what values or conditions would trigger this case statement, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement."
GCC,riscv,926,"if ( letter && letter != 'z' ) {
  output_operand_lossage ( <STR_LIT> , letter ) ;
  fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , reg_names [ REGNO ( op ) ] ) ;
}
else if ( op == CONST0_RTX ( GET_MODE ( op ) ) ) {
  fputs ( reg_names [ GP_REG_FIRST ] , file ) ;
}
else {
  output_address ( mode , XEXP ( op , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;
}"
GCC,riscv,927,"output_addr_const ( file , riscv_strip_unspec_address ( op ) ) ;"
GCC,riscv,928,The code will set the value of punsignedp to the value of unsignedp.
GCC,riscv,929,"""Return <NUM_LIT> if riscv_secondary_memory_needed(mode, from, to) is true, otherwise return <NUM_LIT>."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,930,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted.
GCC,riscv,931,"""</s> This code snippet ends with a curly brace, indicating the end of a code block. It is possible that this code snippet is part of a larger program or function."""
GCC,riscv,932,"""<s> End of conditional statement."""
GCC,riscv,933,"printf(""Performing RISC-V reorganization...""); }

Closing curly brace (})."
GCC,riscv,934,"The next statement would check the condition: if the 'epilogue_cfa_sp_offset' exists, and the current register number is equal to the HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, then it would proceed to create an adjusted call frame address rtx using 'gen_rtx_PLUS' and the stack pointer rtx, with the epilogue_cfa_sp_offset as the immediate value."
GCC,riscv,935,"</s>

else if ( rtx_equal_p (count1_rtx, count2_rtx) ) {

return const1_rtx ;

}

""return const2_rtx ;"""
GCC,riscv,936,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the context and full code snippet. The code may continue with a return statement, function call, conditional statement, or any other valid C programming statement."
GCC,riscv,937,arg.next();
GCC,riscv,938,"\N{NUM_LIT}
This statement sets all values in the ""args"" struct to 0."
GCC,riscv,939,"</s>


return ++libcall_counter[mask];"
GCC,riscv,940,"riscv_emit_move (new_mem, new_reg);"
GCC,riscv,941,"<r> fn ( gen_rtx_REG ( mode , regno ) , mem ) ; </r>"
GCC,riscv,942,"The next statement is likely to involve using the ""mem"" variable to store or access data within the generated frame memory. For example, it may involve assigning a value to ""mem"" or using it as a parameter in a function call."
GCC,riscv,943,I am unable to predict the next statement without more context about the code snippet. Please provide more information.
GCC,riscv,944,"// This code returns the default section for the given declaration, relocation, and alignment."
GCC,riscv,945,The next statement will most likely be a declaration of a variable or function using the returned section determined by the switch statement.
GCC,riscv,946,"""The value of gp_saved is larger than <NUM_LIT>, so a rtx pointer is created and assigned a value based on the sum of virtual_incoming_args_rtx, REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE, and the calculated value gp_saved multiplied by UNITS_PER_WORD."""
GCC,riscv,947,"} if (REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE(cfun->decl) == <NUM_LIT>) cfun->machine->varargs_size = gp_saved * UNITS_PER_WORD; move_block_from_reg(vfp_saved + VFP_ARG_FIRST, mem, vfp_saved);"
GCC,riscv,948,"}

If there is a non-void return statement or non-void arguments for the function, an error will be thrown."
GCC,riscv,949,"riscv_emit_move(gen_frame_mem (GET_MODE (address), slot_address) , address);"
GCC,riscv,950,"The next statement will be ""addr = plus_constant (Pmode, base, offset)""."
GCC,riscv,951,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables <NUM_LIT> and g_switch_value. They could be used in a conditional statement or as arguments in a function call."
GCC,riscv,952,return true;
GCC,riscv,953,"<return;false;

if ( TARGET_INT && SRC_P ( src ) )
return true ;"
GCC,riscv,954,The next statement is "return high - low".
GCC,riscv,955,"low_src = riscv_subword ( src , false ) ;"
GCC,riscv,956,"}

The next statement will be a closing curly brace, ending the if statement."
GCC,riscv,957,It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is no indication of what <NUM_LIT> is equal to.
GCC,riscv,958,"return gen_rtx_fmt_ee ( PLUS , mode , hi , lo ) ;"
GCC,riscv,959,"RET

Return the cost value."
GCC,riscv,960,"The next statement will check if the value of loval is equal to the value of hival and if it is not equal, it will add the result of riscv_build_integer (codes, hival, VOIDmode) to the current value of cost."
GCC,riscv,961,"The statement after the break statement will be:

rtx label;"
GCC,riscv,962,"seqno ++ ; fprintf ( <VAR_REF> , <STR_LIT> , seqno , <ARG>"
GCC,riscv,963,"If neither of the previous conditions is met, return false."
GCC,riscv,964,"}
 This code snippet checks if a set is present and if its destination is a memory location in a parallel pattern."
GCC,riscv,965,There are no more statements in this code snippet.
GCC,riscv,966,"if ( CONST_P ( op ) ) return simplify_gen_subreg ( word_mode , op , mode , byte ) ;"
GCC,riscv,967,if (mode == VOIDmode ) return mode ;
GCC,riscv,968,This function swaps the instruction of a riscv static array.
GCC,riscv,969,"</s>

""return inst;"""
GCC,riscv,970,The next statement could be a "break" statement to end the switch statement.
GCC,riscv,971,"The next statement could possibly be another conditional statement, possibly checking for a different condition, or it could be a statement that returns a value or performs an action based on the outcome of the previous conditional statement."
GCC,riscv,972,"The next statement could be ""else: return gen_tls_add_tp_dedi (dest, base, tp, sym)""."
GCC,riscv,973,"</r>



<s> else if ( Pmode == QImode ) return gen_tls_add_tp_qedi ( dest , base , tp , sym ) ; </r>"
GCC,riscv,974,"mem = adjust_address (m_tramp, SImode, <NUM_LIT> * GET_MODE_SIZE(SImode) + <NUM_LIT>) ;"
GCC,riscv,975,"</s>

Set the value of prefix to ""SRODATA"" and set the value of one_only to true."
GCC,riscv,976,'}'
GCC,riscv,977,"</s>

The next statement will likely involve assigning values to the variables ""base"" and ""offset""."
GCC,riscv,978,"elif (offset != NULL) base = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, base , offset) ;"
GCC,riscv,979,"</s>
return (symbol_type == RISCV_SYMBOL_TYPE_PCREL) ? gen_riscv_pcrel_addr (base, offset) : gen_riscv_relaxed_addr (base, offset);"
GCC,riscv,980,"...

return temp;"
GCC,riscv,981,The next statement is "return frame -> save_libcall_adjustment != <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,riscv,982,"if the code snippet is called with a SUBREG as x, then it will check if SUBREG_REG(x) is a valid register number for the given mode and strict_p flags."
GCC,riscv,983,"The next statement will check if the value of 'x' is a sub-register and if it is, it will assign the value of the sub-register to 'x'."
GCC,riscv,984,"return offset == <NUM_LIT> ; }

The next statement would be ""return false;"" with the condition ""return offset == <NUM_LIT> ;"""
GCC,riscv,985,"rtx offset ; split_const ( x , & x , & offset ) ; if ( ! SYMBOL_REF_P ( x ) ) return false ; align = ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ? DECL_ALIGN ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ) : <NUM_LIT> ) ; size = ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) && DECL_SIZE ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ) ? tree_to_uhwi ( DECL_SIZE ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ) ) : <NUM_LIT> * BITS_PER_WORD ) ;"
GCC,riscv,986,return false;
GCC,riscv,987,"}</s>


The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace ""}""."
GCC,riscv,988,"</s>
if (decl is not a riscv naked function) { return true; }"
GCC,riscv,989,if ( cmp1 == const0_rtx ) return(cmp0);
GCC,riscv,990,"else if ( cmp1 == const0_rtx ) return cmp1 ;

The next statement would be ""else if ( cmp1 == const1_rtx ) return cmp1 ;"""
GCC,riscv,991,"return vfloat64_mfill()

The next statement will be: break ; case RVV_VXRM : return vfloat64_mfill()"
GCC,riscv,992,"Next, there may be more cases and associated break statements, or the code may continue on to another section of code."
GCC,riscv,993,b
GCC,riscv,994,"* base = XEXP ( addr , <NUM_LIT> ) ; <SKIP> }
* offset = XEXP ( addr , <NUM_LIT> );
return true;"
GCC,riscv,995,<x = ptr;>
GCC,riscv,996,The next statement would be "return false;" since there is no known equality between offset1 and offset2.
GCC,riscv,997,It is likely that the next statement in the code will check for a condition or perform an action based on the previous if statements.
GCC,riscv,998,The code will return true.
GCC,riscv,999,The next statement would likely be assigning a new value to the variable "shamt" based on the condition in the ternary operator.
GCC,riscv,1000,"}

 Modern hardware typically provides better support for load operations

Modern hardware typically provides better support for store operations"
GCC,riscv,1001,"*Nettie*

The next statement will most likely involve the swapping of elements within the 'operands' array."
GCC,riscv,1002,gcc_assert ( MEM_P ( base1 ) ) ;
GCC,riscv,1003,gcc_assert (r
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,1004,"operands[reg_op] = gen_rtx_REG(mode, regno3);"
GCC,riscv,1005,"operands [reg_op] = gen_rtx_MEM (mode, plus_constant (mode, stack_pointer_rtx, offset)); operands [mem_op] = mem2;"
GCC,riscv,1006,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context, as the code is likely part of a larger program and the next statement could vary depending on the specific operation being performed."
GCC,riscv,1007,"insn = emit_insn( gen_rtx_PARALLEL( VOIDmode, gen_rtvec( <NUM_LIT>, set1, set2 ) ) ) ; RTX_FRAME_UNCHANGED_P ( insn ) = <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,riscv,1008,"if (load_p) {
    load_regs(operands, mode);
} else {
    save_regs(operands, mode);
}



It will either load or save the registers depending on the value of the 'load_p' parameter."
GCC,arc,0,"builtin_define ( <STR_LIT> ) ; def_or_undef_macro ( pfile , NAME , CONDITION ) ; builtin_define_with_int_value ( <STR_LIT> , arc_tp_regno ) ;
An integer value macro will be defined with the name ""arc_tp_regno""."
GCC,arc,1,"builtin_assert ( pfile, NAME, CONDITION ) ;"
GCC,arc,2,It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is not enough information given in the provided code snippet.
GCC,arc,3,invoke_builtin_func();
GCC,arc,4,The next statement would be: "if ( TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ) builtin_define ( <STR_LIT> ) ;" meaning that the statement "builtin_define" will only be executed if the condition "TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN" is true.
GCC,arc,5,"predict: builtin_define ( TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ;
builtin_define (TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>) ;"
GCC,arc,6,"</s>

Quote or print out the statement ""cpp_define ( pfile , name ) ;"" to the console."
GCC,arc,7,"if (!def_p) cpp_undef (pfile, name);"
GCC,arc,8,"]

The next statement would be ""default: break;"""
GCC,arc,9,"The next statement would be the default case, which would most likely be a break statement."
GCC,arc,10,"}

if ( TARGET_HS && ( arc_tune == ARC_TUNE_ARCHS4X_REL31A ) ) switch ( get_attr_type ( pred ) ) { case TYPE_STORE : switch ( get_attr_type ( succ ) ) { case TYPE_BRCC : case TYPE_BRCC_NO_DELAY_SLOT : case TYPE_LOOP_END : return <NUM_LIT> ; default : break ; } break ; }
  
}"
GCC,arc,11,"Else, return false."
GCC,arc,12,"""return true;"""
GCC,arc,13,"}</s>
if ( TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS ) { emit_insn ( gen_frame_reloc ( RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( insn ) ) ) ; }"
GCC,arc,14,int intval2 = ( REG_P ( operands [ 4 ] ) ? 1 : CONST_INT_P ( operands [ 5] ) ? INTVAL ( operands [ 6] ) : 7 ) ;
GCC,arc,15,"""reg = gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , end_reg - <NUM_LIT> ) ;"""
GCC,arc,16,"The code is setting up the frame for a function. It is storing registers and their values in the function's stack frame. The next statement may be another set statement, as the code continues to loop through registers and store them in the stack frame. It may also be a variable assignment or a conditional statement. Without more context, it is difficult to predict the exact next statement."
GCC,arc,17,nothing will be returned because the default case is executed
GCC,arc,18,Assign the value of the expression ( ( MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset ) * UNITS_PER_WORD ) to the variable *pretend_size and continue execution.
GCC,arc,19,"The next statement is another if statement, checking if there is any overlap in the operands. If there is, the variable ""swap"" will be set to a value of <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,20,The next statement would be "switch (GET_CODE (xop[default] + i)) {
GCC,arc,21,The code will assign a new value to the variable "operands" using the "gen_rtx_PLUS" function with the mode "SImode" and the previous value of "operands" added twice.
GCC,arc,22,"operands[<NUM_LIT>] =  gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, operands[<NUM_LIT>], operands[<NUM_LIT>]);"
GCC,arc,23,"The next statement could potentially be another conditional statement or a return statement, depending on the value of ""val""."
GCC,arc,24,"operands[<NUM_LIT>] = gen_rtx_MINUS ( SImode , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] );"
GCC,arc,25,"}</s>

The code will then check if the target platform is ARC700 before returning."
GCC,arc,26,"if ( arc_hazard ( insn , succ1 ) || arc_check_release31a ( insn , succ1 ) ) emit_insn_before ( gen_nopv ( ) , succ1 ) ;"
GCC,arc,27,"}</s>

The next statement would most likely be another if statement to check for another condition."
GCC,arc,28,"}</s>

The next statement could be an else statement to handle any other possible values for the arc_ccfsm_state variable. For example:

else {
    return <DIFFERENT NUM_LIT>; // Handle all other cases
}"
GCC,arc,29,arc_ccfsm_state += <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,30,"}</s>

Current instruction set condition code will be set to the last instruction set condition code."
GCC,arc,31,if ( ! current_frame_info . initialized ) return <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,32,"</s>

if ( current_frame_info.total_size == <NUM_LIT> ) return <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,33,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
GCC,arc,34,This code snippet does not have any more statements as it ends with a closing bracket.
GCC,arc,35,The next statement is: arc_punct_chars [ '.' ] = <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,36,"}

The code will break out of the switch statement."
GCC,arc,37,case CONST_INT : return SMALL_INT ( plus1 ) ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,38,"""

The next statement would most likely be ""fputs(<STR_LIT>, asm_out_file);"""
GCC,arc,39,"The code snippet will return the result of the function ""default_assemble_integer"" with the parameters ""x"", ""size"", and ""aligned_p""."
GCC,arc,40,"""The arc_ccfsm_state is set to <NUM_LIT> and the arc_ccfsm_target_insn is set to NULL_RTX."""
GCC,arc,41,"</s>

The next statement would be to close the if statement with a closing bracket, followed by a semicolon."
GCC,arc,42,The next statement will be to return a numerical value.
GCC,arc,43,"print(""New value of arc_ccfsm_state is"", arc_ccfsm_state)"
GCC,arc,44,total_size = <NUM_LIT>
GCC,arc,45,if ( fn_type == ARC_FUNCTION_NORMAL && a == NULL ) { return NULL ; }
GCC,arc,46,The next statement will be: "if (current_frame_info.total_size == <NUM_LIT>) return <NUM_LIT>;"
GCC,arc,47,"The next statement will likely involve some sort of comparison or conditional statement based on the values of low and high. Specifically, it may check if the low value is comparable to the given number or if the high value is equal to the negative of the given number."
GCC,arc,48,"</s>

<s> return <NUM_LIT>;</s>"
GCC,arc,49,"fprintf ( FILE , ""<STR_LIT>"" , XSTR ( SYMREF , <NUM_LIT> ) , XSTR ( SYMREF , <NUM_LIT> ) , arc_mangle_suffix ) ;"
GCC,arc,50,The next statement will likely be a closing bracket or semicolon to end the function or code block.
GCC,arc,51,arc_cpu_string is printed to the asm_out_file.
GCC,arc,52,"Next, the program will check if the code label matches the label referenced in the if statement."
GCC,arc,53,"""Case OPT_mcpu_ : return strcmp ( arg , <STR_LIT> ) == <NUM_LIT> || ARC_EXTENSION_CPU ( arg ) ;"
GCC,arc,54,arc_punct_chars [ '@' ] = <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,55,This function is used to initialize a trampoline for the given function and context.
GCC,arc,56,"...

// This function initializes a trampoline with the given function address and context."
GCC,arc,57,The next statement would be a "break" statement.
GCC,arc,58,"The next statement would be a closing bracket, indicating the end of the code snippet."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,59,"printf(""%slabel%lu\n"", prefix, labelno+1);"
GCC,arc,60,"fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> , sp_str , sp_str )

The next statement would be:

} else if (saved_reg_size != NULL_RTX) {
    final_scan_insn (XEXP (saved_reg_size, 0), file, 0, 0, NULL);
}"
GCC,arc,61,"""fclose(file);"""
GCC,arc,62,"break ;
default: gcc_assert ( GET_CODE ( index ) == REG ) ; fputs ( ""+"", file ) ; fputs ( reg_names [ REGNO ( index ) ] , file ) ; if ( offset != 0 ) { fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> ) ; fprintf ( file , <INT_LIT> ) ; } else { fprintf ( file , <STR_LIT> ) ; fprintf ( file , ""0"" ) ; } break ;"
GCC,arc,63,"if (( / 2 <int> type 

) ) { return true; } else { return false; }</s>

return false;"
GCC,arc,64,"return false ; }

This code snippet checks if the type of an aggregate is correct and will return either true or false depending on the result."
GCC,arc,65,"return choose

false"
GCC,arc,66,"} 

""<e> The loop ""for"" with the amount increased by one has started and will continue till the condition is met."
GCC,arc,67,"</s>

{ break; }"
GCC,arc,68,"The next statement would likely be:

The code will return CCmode."
GCC,arc,69,increment first_reg_offset by 1
GCC,arc,70,"}

nextarg will be updated to include an additional constant value."
GCC,arc,71,"</s

There are three possible outcomes: a symbolic_operand, a CONST_INT if it is a legitimate constant, or a REG."
GCC,arc,72,"f = const0_rtx }

return f;"
GCC,arc,73,"return get_mem_operand(op, mode);"
GCC,arc,74,This code snippet returns a boolean value based on whether or not the code of the input variable is a constant integer within a certain range.
GCC,arc,75,"I'm sorry, I am not able to accurately predict the code since the values ""<NUM_LIT>"" are unspecified. Can you please provide the actual values for me to make a prediction?"
GCC,arc,76,"</s>

   <s> return 0 ;</s>"
GCC,arc,77,"emjit_insn (gen_rtx_IF (VOIDmode , gen_rtix_COMPARE (mode, x, y), cc_reg));"
GCC,arc,78,"<NUM_LIT> } </s>

The next statement would likely be a default case, where a value is returned if the input comparison does not match any of the specified cases."
GCC,arc,79,The next statement would likely be "break;" to end the switch statement.
GCC,arc,80,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without further context. However, based on the current snippet, it is possible that the next statement could involve manipulating the variable op in some way, such as assigning a new value or performing an operation on it."
GCC,arc,81,Possible next statement: default: return <NUM_LIT>;
GCC,arc,82,"} }
The return value would be <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,83,"return <NUM_LIT_2> ; } }

There will be a return statement for a numeric literal value or a boolean expression."
GCC,arc,84,break;
GCC,arc,85,The next statement would return the address of the operand from the code snippet.
GCC,arc,86,"address_operand(XEXP(op, 1), mode)"
GCC,arc,87,<NUM_LIT>
GCC,arc,88,"""execute the nonimmediate_operand function, passing in the variable op and the mode variable as arguments."""
GCC,arc,89,"return force_nonimmediate_operand(op, mode);"
GCC,arc,90,//Restart the shift loop
GCC,arc,91,"if ( GET_MODE ( XEXP ( op , <NUM_LIT> ) ) == CCNOmode ) return ( code == LTU || code == GEU || code == GTU || code == LEU ) ;"
GCC,arc,92,"</s>

case COND_SET_V :"
GCC,arc,93,"break ;case COND_CLEAR :case COND_CLEARZ

current_insn_set_cc_p = <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,94,NULL
GCC,arc,95,"op = XEXP (op, <STR_LIT>);"
GCC,arc,96,None.
GCC,arc,97,if ( GET_CODE ( op ) == MEM ) ret
GCC,arc,98,"op = XEXP ( op , <ADDR_EXPR> ) ;"
GCC,arc,99,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet.
GCC,arc,100,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the outcome of the switch statement."
GCC,arc,101,return <NUM_LIT>;
GCC,arc,102,len
GCC,arc,103,len + 1
GCC,arc,104,The statement after this would be "return bytes;"
GCC,arc,105,int ret = arg_num * 2;
GCC,arc,106,"ASM_OUTPUT_VALUE ( stream , name , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,107,"Next statement: ( * targetm . asm_out . assemble_visibility ) ( stream , lv , vis ) ;"
GCC,arc,108,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet is most likely to be a closing curly brace."
GCC,arc,109,We are returning true.
GCC,arc,110,"</s>

the function will return true if the loop depth is less than the maximum value defined by ""NUM_LIT"", otherwise it will return false."
GCC,arc,111,"</s>

<s> move to the next iteration of the loop </s>"
GCC,arc,112,The next statement will be the closing bracket " } " to end the "else" statement.
GCC,arc,113,"The next statement could be:
frame_info -> gmask = gmask;"
GCC,arc,114,fn_type = ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK3;
GCC,arc,115,The next statement would be: "return fun -> machine -> fn_type = fn_type ;"
GCC,arc,116,The next statement would be "return <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,117,"}


""if (decl == NULL_TREE || decl == error_mark_node ) { [...] }"""
GCC,arc,118,"return decl;

The next statement might be a closing curly brace to close the function.
}"
GCC,arc,119,The code will return orig_x.
GCC,arc,120,"The next statement will be an ""else"" statement that checks if the GET_CODE of x is EQUAL and the GET_CODE of XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) is EQUAL to an UNSPEC of type ARC_UNSPEC_GOT."
GCC,arc,121,"if ( flags != SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS ( symbol ) ) <<UNSUPPORTED>

The next statement would likely check if any of the call attributes have been found, and if so, set the appropriate flag for the symbol reference."
GCC,arc,122,"} }
Possible next statement: ""else { return false; }"""
GCC,arc,123,The next statement could be "epilogue_done:".
GCC,arc,124,If (store[i ^2] ) then emit_insn(store[i ^2]);
GCC,arc,125,"The next statement will likely involve the ""return false;"" code, indicating that the current criteria is not met and the function should stop execution."
GCC,arc,126,"frame_pointer_rtx = gen_frame_mem ( Pmode , gen_rtx_PRE_DEC ( Pmode , stack_pointer_rtx ) ) ; frame_move_inc ( frame_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx , & first_offset"
GCC,arc,127,"pat = gen_rtx_NOTE ( Pmode , gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF ( Pmode , <STR_LIT> ) , pat ) ;"
GCC,arc,128,final_update_status ( current_output_insn )
GCC,arc,129,"The next statement could be another function call, a variable assignment, or a conditional statement. It is difficult to determine the exact statement without more context."
GCC,arc,130,The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks if the arc frame pointer is required. This could be followed by an if-else statement or a return statement that determines the specific action based on the result of the condition.
GCC,arc,131,"""ret and debstr have been assigned values based on the current mode and arg_num."""
GCC,arc,132,"} // The next statement will be a closing curly brace, ending the else statement."
GCC,arc,133,"</s>

If `words` is not equal to 0, then the code will execute the `* cum = ARC_NEXT_ARG_REG ( * cum ) ;` statement for every `i` from `<NUM_LIT>` to `words - 1`."
GCC,arc,134,i = 0 ;
GCC,arc,135,The next statement is likely to be the end of the if statement and the start of the return statement.
GCC,arc,136,"}</s>

 The next statement could be a declaration of a variable or a function call using the static bool arc_function_ok_for_sibcall function."
GCC,arc,137,machine -> concat
GCC,arc,138,"The code will execute a warning function with the parameters OPT_Wattributes, <STR_LIT>, and name."
GCC,arc,139,"}

The warning message will be printed again with the value and name parameters, and the no_add_attrs variable will be set to true."
GCC,arc,140,"""return arc600_corereg_hazard ( pred , succ ) ;"""
GCC,arc,141,"if ( JUMP_P ( insn ) ) {
  rtx_insn * next = next_nonnote_insn ( insn ) ;"
GCC,arc,142,Error handling for flag_delayed_branch.
GCC,arc,143,"emit_insn(gen_call_insn(tramp, SImode, fnaddr, cxt))"
GCC,arc,144,if ( ( from == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM ) && ( to == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM ) ) { return ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . extra_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . reg_size ) ; }
GCC,arc,145,"<NL>

Register save-area pseudo-registers match?

True"
GCC,arc,146,The next statement will define a built-in function targeting the ARC700 with parameters <NUM_LIT> and <STR_LIT> and a return type of void.
GCC,arc,147,"""Set the machine's force_short_suffix value to a negative literal number."""
GCC,arc,148,"return machine =

The next statement would likely be ""machine->insn_align = -1;"" before the return statement."
GCC,arc,149,The next statement would be: else arc_mode_class [ i ] = <NUM_LIT> << ( int ) SF_MODE ;
GCC,arc,150,}
GCC,arc,151,this statement could potentially initialize an additional aspect of the insn_length_parameters_t data structure using a function called "arc_get_insn_variants".
GCC,arc,152,"If <NUM_LIT> is true, then the code will check several conditions for the decl variable and return false if any of those conditions evaluate to true."
GCC,arc,153,if ( INSN_P ( prev ) && recog_memoized ( prev ) >= <NUM_LIT-1> ) return <NUM_LIT-1>;
GCC,arc,154,The code will return the value of align_labels_log.
GCC,arc,155,"There is no next statement in this code snippet. However, if there was more code following it, the next statement would likely be an if statement checking for some other condition."
GCC,arc,156,return false;
GCC,arc,157,Cannot be determined without further context.
GCC,arc,158,"The next statement of this code snippet would likely be a comparison or logical statement using the values returned from the GET_CODE, XVECLEN, XINT, and GET_CODE functions."
GCC,arc,159,"</s>


The code will return the value of applying the ""!"" operator to the result of calling the function ""arc_raw_symbolic_reference_mentioned_p"" with the arguments ""x"" and ""true""."
GCC,arc,160,"The next statement is inner = force_operand (inner , NULL_RTX, VOIDmode) ;"
GCC,arc,161,"emit_move_insn ( pat , addr ) ; }
The next statement would likely be another condition or loop starting with ""if"" or ""else,"" as shown in the current code snippet."
GCC,arc,162,"This code snippet appears to be part of the final code generation process for a compiler. It looks like it is handling address calculation for a PIC (position-independent code) mode. The next statement will most likely involve further manipulation of the ""pat"" variable, either by generating a new expression using gen_rtx functions or by emitting another move instruction using emit_move_insn."
GCC,arc,163,"This code snippet is likely part of a larger function or program. Based on the context of the previous statements, the next likely statement is a return statement that returns the boolean value ""true."""
GCC,arc,164,The code will return true.
GCC,arc,165,"}</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""arc_lra_p"" that returns the opposite of a variable called TARGET_NO_LRA."
GCC,arc,166,"The next statement would be: 

return false;"
GCC,arc,167,The next statement would likely be "return false ;" This would only be true if the previous condition of the if statement is not met.
GCC,arc,168,Return insn.
GCC,arc,169,pat = PATTERN ( insn ) ;
GCC,arc,170,"The next statement is likely to be an operation involving the variables defined in the previous statements, such as assigning a value to ret based on the conditions of short_p."
GCC,arc,171,"<s>

<\S>return buf"
GCC,arc,172,"printf ( ""Image file name %s saved to buffer %s."" , fname, buf ) ;"
GCC,arc,173,"} // The next statement would be 
if ( vcall_offset != <NUM_LIT> ) { ... }"
GCC,arc,174,"arc_output_pic_addr_const (file, XVECEXP(x, <NUM_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>), code); switch (XINT(x, <NUM_LIT>)) {
case ARC_UNSPEC_GOT: fputs(<STR_LIT>, file);
break;
case ARC_UNSPEC_GOTOFF: fputs(<STR_LIT>, file);
break;
case ARC_UNSPEC_PLT: fputs(<STR_LIT>, file);
break;
}"
GCC,arc,175,"break ;


The next statement is case EQ: if (GET_CODE(x) == CONST_INT) { fprintf(file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, INTVAL(x)); } else output_operand_lossage (""not an integer""); break;"
GCC,arc,176,"This code snippet does not have a specific output or action, so it cannot be accurately predicted. It appears to be setting various flags and initializing an ""arc"", but the purpose of these actions is not clear."
GCC,arc,177,The next statement would be "prev->set_note (NOTE_INSN_DELETED);"
GCC,arc,178,a
GCC,arc,179,"""case SYMBOL_REF: { output_constant_pool_address(XEXP(addr, <NUM_LIT>)); break; }"""
GCC,arc,180,"The code snippet will end with an ""else"" statement, indicating that none of the previous conditions were met."
GCC,arc,181,"}

Increment the value of i by 1."
GCC,arc,182,continue;
GCC,arc,183,The code will return <NUM_LIT> as the next statement.
GCC,arc,184,"""The function will return a boolean value representing whether the size of the given type is either equal to or greater than a specified number."""
GCC,arc,185,The next statement is most likely a declaration of a variable using the pointer "afi" to access information from the "frame_info" struct of the current function's machine.
GCC,arc,186,"""<END>"""
GCC,arc,187,"} 

This code snippet ends with closing curly braces."
GCC,arc,188,"""The function will return True if the code for x is a SYMBOL_REF and is also a small constant integer."""
GCC,arc,189,<s> print("The code of x is PLUS.");
GCC,arc,190,"}

return false;"
GCC,arc,191,"addr = plus_constant ( Pmode , base_reg , offset ) ; addr = gen_rtx_POST_MODIFY ( Pmode , base_reg , addr ) ; } if ( epilogue_p == <NUM_LIT> ) mem = gen_rtx_MEM ( SImode , addr ) ; else mem = gen_rtx_MEM ( SImode , addr ) ; sibthunk_insn = gen_rtx_SET ( VOIDmode , reg , mem ) ; } return sibthunk_insn

The statement after the loop will be ""return sibthunk_insn""."
GCC,arc,192,"addr = Pmode ; }

""else sibcall_insn = insn ;"""
GCC,arc,193,return CC_Cmode;
GCC,arc,194,"next_cum = * get_cumulative_args ( args_so_far ) ; arc_function_arg_advance ( pack_cumulative_args ( & next_cum ) , mode , type , <NUM_LIT> ) ; first_anon_arg = next_cum ; if ( first_anon_arg < MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS ) { int first_reg_offset = first_anon_arg ;
int second_reg_offset = first_anon_arg + 1;"
GCC,arc,195,"""Set the size of the buffer to be the number of remaining registers multiplied by the word size."""
GCC,arc,196,"}

Next, there will most likely be a return statement or another function declaration."
GCC,arc,197,"The next statement would be: ""emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( VOIDmode , operands [ NUM_LIT ] , operands [ NUM_LIT ] ) ) ; end_sequence ( ) ;"""
GCC,arc,198,The next statement would be "operands[<NUM_LIT> - swap] = xop [<NUM_LIT>]".
GCC,arc,199,The next statement will calculate the sum of the constant and the <NUM_LIT> value and return the result using the given mode and address.
GCC,arc,200,"if (!TARGET_UB82)
{
  addr += 4;
}

return addr;"
GCC,arc,201,The next statement is likely to involve adding a numeric value to the variable "priority".
GCC,arc,202,"}

if (iscompact == true) { 
    optimize_for_compact_code(machine); 
} else { 
    optimize_for_regular_code(machine); 
}"
GCC,arc,203,"return XEXP ( pat , 0 ) ;"
GCC,arc,204,"</s>

if ( XEXP ( dest , <NUM_LIT> ) == pc_rtx ) dest_uid = <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,205,"case constx : return VALID ;

The next statement will likely be another case or a break statement."
GCC,arc,206,"default :
    // do something here
}

The next statement would most likely be a closing curly bracket, as the code block for the default case is complete."
GCC,arc,207,break;
GCC,arc,208,"if (mode != VOIDmode) {
    size = GET_MODE_SIZE(mode);
    addr = op;
} else {
    size = GET_MODE_SIZE(GET_MODE(op));
    addr = XEXP(op, 0);
}"
GCC,arc,209,"<s> size = GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) ; if ( size > UNITS_PER_WORD ) return false ; addr = XEXP ( op , <NUM_LIT> ) ; return ! LEGITIMATE_SMALL_DATA_ADDRESS_P ( addr ) ;"
GCC,arc,210,"<

rarr = gen_rtx_FRAME ( insn ) ;"
GCC,arc,211,"The next statement could be:
return temp;"
GCC,arc,212,"if (GET_CODE(operands[<NUM_LIT>]) != MEM) {
     operands[<NUM_LIT>] = gen_reg_rtx(Pmode);
}"
GCC,arc,213,"</s>


<s>block[offset] = value;</s>"
GCC,arc,214,"The next statement could be evaluating the ""else if"" clause: ""if ( reuse ) emit_insn ( gen_add2_insn ( addr , offs ) )""."
GCC,arc,215,"""Perform operation 'op' on all elements in 'array' as specified by iterator 'iter'."""
GCC,arc,216,y =
GCC,arc,217,"}</s>

return gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,218,gcc_unreachable();
GCC,arc,219,"}

""cout << ""The instruction was verified and the machine's alignment was changed."" << endl;"""
GCC,arc,220,"""ctxt with the new name"""
GCC,arc,221,"ctxt->gimple_optimization_pending();
 
ctxt->update_gimple_max_memops();"
GCC,arc,222,"pat = arc_legitimize_address_0 ( pat , pat , mode ) ; if ( pat ) { pat = change_address ( operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , mode , pat ) ; MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES ( pat , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ; operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = pat ; } }

operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = arc_legitimize_address_0 ( pat , pat , Pmode ) ;"
GCC,arc,223,"operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = pat ;}

if (rtx pat = change_address(operands[<NUM_LIT>], mode, pat) {
operands[<NUM_LIT>] = pat;
}"
GCC,arc,224,else return false;
GCC,arc,225,>Skip the subrtxes of iter.
GCC,arc,226,The return statement checks whether the result of comparing the string representations and equality of two variables are both true.
GCC,arc,227,I am unable to provide a prediction as this code snippet is incomplete and lacks context. Please provide more information for a more accurate prediction.
GCC,arc,228,"The next statement in this code snippet would be an ""if"" statement, checking if the GET_CODE of x is equal to PARALLEL, and if so, executing the function ""walk_stores."""
GCC,arc,229,"stmt = XVECEXP ( dest , 1 , )

<NUM_LIT>

<NUM_LIT> + 1"
GCC,arc,230,count_nr ++
GCC,arc,231,"""else * srcp = XVECEXP ( * slot , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> );"""
GCC,arc,232,Do something with the contents of the STRING_CST.
GCC,arc,233,"If name is not equal to IDENTIFIER_TYPE, the function type will be set to ARC_FUNCTION_NORMAL."
GCC,arc,234,"The next statement is likely to assign the result of the function gen_rtx_REG to the XVECEXP variable, with SImode and regno as parameters."
GCC,arc,235,"} }

If the first expression is not an integer, the code will output a warning to remind the user to optimize the arguments. Otherwise, the code will check the alignment of the second expression."
GCC,arc,236,"gcc_assert ( cfun -> machine -> insns_ra_save == 0 || size_to_deallocate + cfun -> machine -> insns_ra_save == UNITS_PER_WORD || cfun -> machine -> insns_ra_save == - 1 ) ; return ; <NUM_LIT> . $    

s"
GCC,arc,237,frame_stack_add (size - restored)
GCC,arc,238,<NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,239,"pat = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, pat, gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF (Pmode, <STR_LIT>)) ;"
GCC,arc,240,The program will raise a warning about the attributes of the string constant named "value" and continue with the program by setting the no_add_attrs variable to True.
GCC,arc,241,"}


The next statement is likely a closing curly brace to end the ""else if"" statement."
GCC,arc,242,<NUM_LIT>
GCC,arc,243,"case <NUM_LIT> : {
  
A code block will be added with the label <NUM_LIT> to the program."
GCC,arc,244,"case <NUM_LIT>:
if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P(insn)) break;


## ""case <NUM_LIT>: if ( ! NONDEBUG_INSN_P ( insn ) ) break ; continue ; }"""
GCC,arc,245,The next statement could be an error being raised if certain conditions are met.
GCC,arc,246,arc_mode_class [ i ] = <NUM_LIT> << ( int ) C_MODE ;
GCC,arc,247,"}

We cannot determine the next statement since the code snippet does not specify any condition or Boolean value to determine the flow of execution."
GCC,arc,248,"</s>


<s> if ( optimize_size == <NUM_LIT> ) optimize_flag = <NUM_LIT> ; if ( flag_cache ) target_flags |= MASK_NO_SDATA_GET ;</s>"
GCC,arc,249,"The next statement would likely be one involving the ""index"" and ""base"" variables, such as setting their values or using them in a calculation."
GCC,arc,250,"</s>

output_addr_const(file, addr); break;"
GCC,arc,251,"rtx srcLow = simplify_char_literal (3)

emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( srcHigh , gen_rtx_UNSPEC_VOLATILE (Pmode, gen_rtvec(3,dest), VUNSPEC_ARC_LR_HIGH ))) ; emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( srcLow , gen_rtx_UNSPEC_VOLATILE (Pmode, gen_rtvec(3,dest), VUNSPEC_ARC_LR ))) ;"
GCC,arc,252,else { state = d
GCC,arc,253,"} } }
This code snippet is not designed to output a statement, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. It depends on the values of the variables <NUM_LIT>, base_reg, and gmask."
GCC,arc,254,"</s>

It will move a block of memory from a register to arg_pointer_rtx."
GCC,arc,255,The code will create a jump instruction and assign it to the variable "insn".
GCC,arc,256,"return emit_jump_insn ( gen_rtx_fmt (

g, RTX_UNLIKELY, g ) )

static void emit_unlikely_jump ( rtx insn ) { return emit_jump_insn ( gen_rtx_fmt (g, RTX_UNLIKELY, g ) ); }"
GCC,arc,257,"if (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && ((cmode == SFmode && TARGET_FP_SP_BASE) || (cmode == DFmode && TARGET_FP_DP_BASE))) {
  emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (cc_reg, gen_rtx_COMPARE(mode, x, y)));
} else if (GET_MODE_CLASS(cmode) == MODE_FLOAT && TARGET_OPTFPE) {
  rtx op0 = gen_rtx_REG (cmode, <NUM_LIT>);
  rtx op1 = gen_rtx_REG (cmode, GET_MODE_SIZE(cmode) / UNITS_PER_WORD);
  bool swap = false;
  switch"
GCC,arc,258,The next statement is "return true;"
GCC,arc,259,"emit_insn ( pat ) ; } }

if (GET_CODE(operands[<NUM_LIT>]) == SET && <NUM_LIT> == 1) {
  <NUM_LIT> = GET_MODE(<NUM_LIT>);
  <NUM_LIT> = XEXP(operands[<NUM_LIT>],<NUM_LIT>);
  pat = arc_legitimize_address_0(<NUM_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>, mode);
  operands[<NUM_LIT>] = forces_reg(<NUM_LIT>, pat);
  if (!cse_not_expected) {
    rtx pat = XEXP"
GCC,arc,260,"rtx set = gen_rtx_SET ( mode , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , pat ) ; rtx insn = gen_insn ( set ) ; }

The next statement is likely to be related to checking if the given pattern and operands are expected or not and potentially generating an instruction for them if they are. It might also involve checking for common subexpression elimination not being expected."
GCC,arc,261,"} }
The next statement will be a closing curly brace, ending the for loop."
GCC,arc,262,"</s>

The next statement will repeat the arc_hazard check but with the successor node succ1. So it will be:
if ( arc_hazard ( insn , succ1 ) ) { emit_insn_before ( gen_nopv ( ) , succ1 ) ;"
GCC,arc,263,"if ( GET_CODE ( plus1 ) != REG && ( GET_CODE ( plus1 ) != MULT || ! CONST_INT_P ( XEXP ( plus1 , <NUM_LIT> ) ) || ( INTVAL ( XEXP ( plus1 , <NUM_LIT> ) ) != <NUM_LIT> && INTVAL ( XEXP ( plus1 , <NUM_LIT> ) ) != <NUM_LIT> ) ) ) break ; 

The next statement will be ""if (TARGET_NPS_CMEM && cmem_address(addr, DImode)) return COSTS_N_INSNS (2);"""
GCC,arc,264,"else if ( GET_CODE ( SET_SRC ( body ) , <NUM_LIT> ) == SIMPLE_RETURN ) { seeking_return = <NUM_LIT> ;
gcc_unreachable ( ) ;"
GCC,arc,265,The next statement would most likely be a closing curly brace (}).
GCC,arc,266,"RTL_PURE_CALL_P (call_insn) = <NUM_LIT>; add_function_usage_to(call_insn, call_fusage); rtx_insn *insns = get_insns(); end_sequence(); rtx dest = gen_reg_rtx(Pmode);

None, as this is the last line of code in the snippet."
GCC,arc,267,emit_insn (pat);
GCC,arc,268,"pat = gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (gen_rtx_COMPARE (PATTERN (pat), PATTERN (ARC_UNSPEC_OFFSET)), substitute (pat, PATTERN (pat)),pat );"
GCC,arc,269,"}

emit_insn ( gen_tls_load_tp_hard ( ) ) ;"
GCC,arc,270,The code will return the register that was just generated.
GCC,arc,271,"pass_register ( &arc_ifcvt4_info ) ;
The arc_init_reg_tables() function is called to initialize some tables, and then certain punctuation characters are set to specific numerical values. Next, there is a conditional statement that checks if the value of the ""optimize"" variable is greater than <NUM_LIT> and if the value of the ""TARGET_NO_COND_EXEC"" variable is false. If both conditions are met, two optimization passes are created and registered, one to insert after another pass and one to insert before another pass."
GCC,arc,272,The next statement would be: register_pass(&arc_ifcvt5_info);
GCC,arc,273,arc_mode_class [ i ] = ( <NUM_LIT> << ( int ) T_MODE )
GCC,arc,274,break;
GCC,arc,275,if (
GCC,arc,276,"return true ; }

The next statement is: return false ;"
GCC,arc,277,The next statement is "return true ;"
GCC,arc,278,"}

The next statement would be to check if the GET_CODE of x is CONST and if it is, set x to be the XEXP of x and a <NUM_LIT> constant."
GCC,arc,279,"x = XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) ; }

""If the next GET_CODE of x is UNSPEC, the code will be evaluated based on the value of XINT."""
GCC,arc,280,"return true ; }

if ( GET_MODE ( addr ) != VOIDmode ) return true ;if ( GET_CODE ( addr ) != CONST ) return false ;"
GCC,arc,281,"}</s>


The next statement would be to close the function with a closing curly brace ""}"""
GCC,arc,282,The next statement could be another conditional check or a return statement depending on the result of the previous condition.
GCC,arc,283,"return new_x

The code will return a new rtx value by calling the function arc_legitimize_address_0 with the parameters orig_x, oldx, and mode."
GCC,arc,284,"} 

enum int arc_model = <UNDEFINED>




return arc_model;"
GCC,arc,285,"if (base == op0 && pat == op1)
  return orig;"
GCC,arc,286,"The program will generate a vector with the address and a base name, unless the base name is DTPOFF_ZERO_SYM, in which case the program will check whether flag_pic is set and, if not, it will go to the local_exec part of the code."
GCC,arc,287,"}

If there is no successor basic block, the code will assert the next instruction to be a basic block, and then assign the successor basic block as the note for that basic block."
GCC,arc,288,"The next statement could potentially be a default case for the switch statement, or it could end the code block."
GCC,arc,289,It is not possible to make a prediction about the next statement of this code snippet without more information.
GCC,arc,290,"Next, there may be some additional code that uses the values of the variables declared in the snippet above, or the execution of a function that takes in those variables as parameters. Without seeing the full context of the code, it is difficult to accurately predict the next statement."
GCC,arc,291,"else pat = <STR_LIT> ;

else if (satisfies_constraint_C3p (operands[<NUM_LIT>] ) )


pat = <STR_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,292,"In this statement, the code is checking if the current expression, x, is a UNSPEC operation. If it is, the code will check if it is one of several specific types of UNSPEC operations and set the appropriate suffix and pcrel values. If it is not one of those specific operations, the code will output the expression as a PIC address constant."
GCC,arc,293,"</s>

Predict the next statement of the code snippet would be <s> break ;"
GCC,arc,294,"The code will output pic_addr_const (the file, the value of c, and the value of NUM_LIT), and then break out of the if statement. After breaking, the code will check if the GET_CODE of c is PLUS, and then assert that the GET_CODE of XEXP (c, NUM_LIT) is SYMBOL_REF and CONST_INT."
GCC,arc,295,"arc_output_pic_addr_const ( file , c , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,296,"rtx srcLow = simplify_gen_subreg (SImode, src, DFmode, TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT>); emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (destHigh, gen_rtx_UNSPEC_VOLATILE(Pmode, gen_rtvec(<NUM_LIT>, src), VUNSPEC_ARC_LR_HIGH))); emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (destLow, gen_rtx_UNSPEC_VOLATILE(Pmode, gen_rtvec(<NUM_LIT>, src), VUNSPEC_ARC_LR)));"
GCC,arc,297,"""<s> return <NUM_LIT> ;"""
GCC,arc,298,The next statement is "return false ;".
GCC,arc,299,"}</s>

The next statement could be: ""return false;"""
GCC,arc,300,"* total += ( rtx_cost ( XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) , mode , MINUS , <NUM_LIT> , speed ) + rtx_cost ( XEXP ( XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) , <NUM_LIT> ) , mode , <NUM_LIT> , speed ) ) ; return true ; }

The next statement would be ""return false;"" as it is the end of the code snippet block. If the previous conditions are not met for case PLUS or case MINUS, the function will return a boolean value of false."
GCC,arc,301,"The next statement in this code snippet is ""in_addr = XEXP (in_addr , <NUM_LIT>)"". This is within the scope of the if statement checking if in_set exists, indicating that a comparison or operation is being performed on the addresses stored in in_addr and out_addr."
GCC,arc,302,return true ;
GCC,arc,303,The next statement will be "case V8SImode : return TARGET_SIMD_SET ;"
GCC,arc,304,"</s>

<s> return; </s>"
GCC,arc,305,<s> if (jump) { count++; }
GCC,arc,306,"operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = pat ; } }

The next statement is a comparison using the ""if"" conditional statement, followed by an assignment to the variable ""pat""."
GCC,arc,307,The next statement is: operands [<NUM_LIT>] = temp;
GCC,arc,308,"The code will check if succ0 exists, and if it does not represent a jump or a function call, it will check whether there is a hazard between insn and succ1. If there is a hazard, it will emit a ""nopv"" insn after insn and then continue the loop."
GCC,arc,309,sizes->quick_push(<NUM_LIT>);
GCC,arc,310,It is not possible to accurately predict the statement without knowing the code or context.
GCC,arc,311,"</s> 

Practice shows that this code snippet will most likely return the value of the FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM register in RAW mode."
GCC,arc,312,The next statement is a curly bracket closing the function.
GCC,arc,313,"This code snippet is checking if the to variable is equal to the value of the FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM or if the arc_frame_pointer_needed function returns false. The next statement would be a return statement, possibly returning a boolean value based on the result of the expression."
GCC,arc,314,"}

It is likely that the next statement will include a return value, as the current statement is a boolean function."
GCC,arc,315,"The code is calculating the total size of the frame and storing it in the field ""reg_offset"" within the frame_info struct. The next statement is likely to be a return statement, as the total size of the frame has been calculated and stored."
GCC,arc,316,"It is likely that the next statement will be an ""else"" statement, which checks if none of the previous conditions were met. The ""gcc_unreachable()"" function is then called, which indicates that the previous conditions were expected to be met and a different outcome is not possible."
GCC,arc,317,"<
 illegal instruction ; ldw acc mem ( offset )"
GCC,arc,318,"cfun -> machine -> fn_state = < /s>

<s> ARC_INTERRUPT_P(cfun->machine->fn_type) = True </s>"
GCC,arc,319,The next statement would be a closing curly brace that ends the function.
GCC,arc,320,"return <NUM_LIT>
return;"
GCC,arc,321,"tmpx [ i ] = adjust_address_nv ( operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , GET_MODE ( operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) , dst_addr ) if ( n_pieces < ( unsigned int ) <NUM_LIT> ) { n_pieces = ( ( size + n_pieces - <NUM_LIT> * piece ) / piece ) >= ( unsigned int ) <NUM_LIT> ? <NUM_LIT> + n_pieces / piece : <NUM_LIT> + n_pieces / n_pieces + <NUM_LIT> ; n_pieces += <NUM_LIT> ; }"
GCC,arc,322,store [ <NUM_LIT> ] = store [ <NUM_LIT> ] = NULL_RTX ;
GCC,arc,323,"asm_fprintf ( asm_out_file , <STR_LIT> , TARGET_RF16 ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,324,"asm_fprintf ( asm_out_file , <STR_LIT> , ( disk_fs != - <NUM_LIT> ) ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,325,arc_ccfsm_current will be set to a numerical value and the prescan_initialized attribute of cfun's machine will be set to a numerical value.
GCC,arc,326,The code will assign a new variable called "attrs" to the result of a function "tree_cons".
GCC,arc,327,"The code will check if the code of the node pointed to by the node pointer is a variable declaration. If it is, it will create an attribute tree with a string literal and set it as the type attributes of the fntype tree."
GCC,arc,328,if ( from == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM && to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM ) { return ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . total_size - cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size ) ; }
GCC,arc,329,if ( from != ARG_POINTER_REGNUM || to != STACK_POINTER_REGNUM ) { return NULL; }
GCC,arc,330,"""return false;"""
GCC,arc,331,The code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted.
GCC,arc,332,"//do something
 }
The next statement would most likely be the code to be executed when the condition is met, such as the statement ""do something""."
GCC,arc,333,">

The next statement could be ""else return false;"""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,59,"</s>


The next statement is likely to involve defining a variable or calling a function within the scope of the ""arc_internal_label"" function."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,334,The next statement is a return statement that checks the value of x and returns either true or false based on whether certain conditions are met.
GCC,arc,335,">

break ; case <NUM_LIT> : firq_auto_save_p &= ( regno < <NUM_LIT> ) || ( ( regno > <NUM_LIT> ) && ( regno < <NUM_LIT> ) ) || ( ( regno > <NUM_LIT> ) && ( regno < <NUM_LIT> ) ) || ( ( regno > <NUM_LIT> ) && ( regno < <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; break ; default : firq_auto_save_p = false ;"
GCC,arc,336,"if (TOS_type == <NUM_LIT>)
  then {push (0);}
else
  {push (1);}"
GCC,arc,337,"}

Else, return <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,338,"}

The next statement is: REG_NOTES ( brcc_insn ) = note ;"
GCC,arc,339,"</s>

if ( ( ( fn_type & ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1 ) | ARC_FUNCTION_FIRQ ) != <NUM_LIT> ) regno = ILINK2_REGNUM ;"
GCC,arc,340,The code will return the modified rtx op after applying the replace_equiv_address_nv function if the MEM_P condition is met and the address is not a legitimate small data address.
GCC,arc,341,end of if statement
GCC,arc,342,"if (addr && !REG_P(x) && MEM_P(x)) {
  addr = simplify_rtx(addr);
} else if (mode == E_QImode) {
  sri->icode = in_p ? CODE_FOR_reload_qi_load : CODE_FOR_reload_qi_store;
}"
GCC,arc,343,if ( machine -> force_short_prefix >= <NUM_LIT> ) return machine -> force_short_prefix ;
GCC,arc,344,"if (check_attr > <NUM_LIT>) {
  machine = get_machine_function();
  if (machine->attr_kind == <NUM_LIT>) return <NUM_LIT>
}"
GCC,arc,345,"break

The next statement is: 
""return mask & (align % mask) == <NUM_LIT> ;"""
GCC,arc,346,"< returns const_rtx x = * iter ; >

return x;"
GCC,arc,347,"case ORDERED : return ARC_CC_NC ; case LT : return ARC_CC_MI ; case GT : return ARC_CC_PL ; case LE : return ARC_CC_LT ; case GE : return ARC_CC_GE ; default : gcc_unreachable ( ) ; }

This code snippet does not contain enough information to predict the next statement. The snippet ends with a default statement and a call to the gcc_unreachable() function, which indicates that this case should not be reached. Anything that happens after this point is unpredictable."
GCC,arc,348,"The code snippet is missing a closing curly brace, so the next statement cannot be determined."
GCC,arc,349,"The next statement is likely to be another case statement in the switch statement, or potentially a default statement depending on the value of xreg."
GCC,arc,350,"return ; }

""return ;}"""
GCC,arc,351,"}

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of the numerical and string literals used in the code."
GCC,arc,352,Prepare to potentially rewrite operands[<NUM_LIT>] as small data or using the symbolic constant if it is in SImode.
GCC,arc,353,"} 

It is not possible to predict the next statement since it depends on the values of the variables and the logic used in the code. It could be any of the if statements or a return statement."
GCC,arc,354,"""A value will be assigned to the const_rtx variable x from the iterator iter."""
GCC,arc,355,"rtx next_statement;

 

next_statement = setjmp (getjmp (), <s>

return next_statement;"
GCC,arc,356,It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet as the variables and functions being used are not defined.
GCC,arc,357,gcc_assert ( total_size == ARC_STACK_ALIGN ( total_size ) ) ;
GCC,arc,358,arc_regno_reg_class[ICC_REG] = NO_REGS;
GCC,arc,359,for (regno = ENTER_LEAVE_START_REG + 1; regno < ENTER_LEAVE_END_REG; regno++)
GCC,arc,360,The next statement would likely be an if statement checking the value of gmask compared to rmask.
GCC,arc,361,"}


If (^[NUM_LIT 0])]"
GCC,arc,362,"}

0

0"
GCC,arc,363,"The next statement will check if the frame size to allocate is still greater than N, and if so, it will add N minus the frame size to the stack."
GCC,arc,364,struct register_pass_info arc_predicate_delay_insns_info =
GCC,arc,365,"The next statement is:
arc_init_reg_tables();"
GCC,arc,366,There will be a closing curly brace to end the if statement.
GCC,arc,367,The next statement would be "else return false ;"
GCC,arc,368,return false;
GCC,arc,369,f
GCC,arc,370,"}

The next statement is ""return insn;"""
GCC,arc,371,return g
GCC,arc,372,"The next statement is ""frame_deallocated += frame_restore_reg(reg, offs);"""
GCC,arc,373,"return addr

addr"
GCC,arc,374,regno = RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM
GCC,arc,375,"This statement is missing a closing curly brace, which is likely to cause a syntax error when the code is compiled."
GCC,arc,376,"}



The next statement would be:

insn = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (nregs + (save_fp ? 1 : 0) + 2));"
GCC,arc,377,"}

The code will generate a SET statement that stores the value of a register into a memory location on the frame stack."
GCC,arc,378,The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( alpha_prologue_desp == <NUM_LIT> ) { for ( index = for ( regno = <NUM_LIT> ; regno <= <NUM_LIT> ; regno ++ ) {
GCC,arc,379,if ( gmask ) for ( int i = <NUM_LIT> ; i >= <NUM_LIT> ; i -- ) { machine_mode save_mode = SImode ; if ( TARGET_LL64 && ( ( i - <NUM_LIT> ) % <NUM_LIT> == <NUM_LIT> ) && ( ( gmask & ( <NUM_LIT> << i ) ) != <NUM_LIT> ) && ( ( gmask & ( <NUM_LIT> << ( i - <NUM_LIT> ) ) ) != <NUM_LIT> ) ) { save_mode = DIm
GCC,arc,380,The next statement will be "}" to close the if statement.
GCC,arc,381,"return

false."
GCC,arc,382,return false;
GCC,arc,383,"return false ; }

Next statement: if both p0 and p1 are true, then return true."
GCC,arc,384,"}</s>

The next statement is a default case, which will return ""false."""
GCC,arc,385,"if ( pat ) { pat = change_address ( operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , mode , pat ) ; MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES ( pat , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ; operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = pat ; } }


In the first statement, the code checks if the operand is a memory reference and an auxiliary register. If it is, it then checks if the auxiliary argument can be retrieved using arc_get_aux_arg(). If it can, a temporary register is created and its value is set to the retrieved auxiliary argument. If it cannot, the code checks if the operand is a symbolic constant"
GCC,arc,386,return GEN_FCN ( icode ) ( arg [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ;
GCC,arc,387,"This snippet predicts that the code will continue to the next case statement and return the result of calling GEN_FCN with the appropriate number of arguments. If none of the case statements match the value of icode, it will reach the default case and call gcc_unreachable."
GCC,arc,388,"}

This code snippet is likely part of a function or subroutine and the next statement is likely a return statement with a numerical value being returned."
GCC,arc,389,"The code snippet will exit the current loop if the value of the variable 'insn' is a NUMBER literal or it is an active instruction that is not a debug instruction, does not contain any notes, and has a pattern code that is not UNSPEC_VOLATILE or PARALLEL."
GCC,arc,390,The next statement is "break;"
GCC,arc,391,return new_section;
GCC,arc,392,new_section->next = sec;
GCC,arc,393,The code snippet will copy the contents of the array "arc_default_alloc_order" into the array "reg_alloc_order".
GCC,arc,394,"</s>

We cannot accurately predict the next statement as there is no context or information about the code."
GCC,arc,395,"</s>
The code snippet is likely part of a function or method that allocates stack slots for arguments."
GCC,arc,396,"</s>

This code snippet is checking whether the function type is ARC_NAKED_P and returning the negation of that evaluation."
GCC,arc,397,"The next statement will likely be a condition check that compares ret to words, with a ternary operator that returns either <NUM_LIT> if ret is greater than or equal to words, or ret multiplied by UNITS_PER_WORD if ret is less than words."
GCC,arc,398,"The next statement is likely to be another line of code within the if statement, possibly setting a variable or performing a calculation."
GCC,arc,399,"<j> = arc_asm_insn_p ( XVECEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> , i - 1 ) ) ;"
GCC,arc,400,"if ( size == <NUM_LIT> ) ASM_OUTPUT_SKIP ( stream , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,401,"asm_fprintf ( f , <STR_LIT> , reg_names [ STATIC_CHAIN_REGNUM ] ) ;"
GCC,arc,402,"asm_fprintf ( f , <STR_LIT> , ARC_ARG_POINTER_REG ) ;"
GCC,arc,403,"""X"""
GCC,arc,404,<NUM_LIT>
GCC,arc,405,"</s>

The next statement will likely use the ""if"" statement to check for a different target, and then push modes for those targets if the condition is met."
GCC,arc,406,"</s>;


return optimize_size;"
GCC,arc,407,"</s>


return arg;"
GCC,arc,408,"CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE ( insn ) = {ret , arg}"
GCC,arc,409,I cannot accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet without more context.
GCC,arc,410,return false;
GCC,arc,411,The code will return either "true" or "false" depending on whether the variable "to" is equal to either HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM or STACK_POINTER_REGNUM.
GCC,arc,412,TRUE
GCC,arc,413,"if ( LAST_PC ( followee ) <ano ( u . r <COLON>

break"
GCC,arc,414,if (var > 5 || var2) return false ;
GCC,arc,415,"if (can_choose_return_insn ())
    {
        return true;
    }else{
        return false;
    }

I'm sorry, I cannot predict the next statement of this code snippet as the code is already complete. Perhaps you are looking for the output of this function, which would be either ""true"" or ""false"" depending on the return value of the arc_can_use_return_insn() function."
GCC,arc,416,if (this_insn != NULL && this_insn == next_nonnote_insn(insn))
GCC,arc,417,"</s>

The next statement might be a closing curly brace to end the function."
GCC,arc,418,"}</s>

It is difficult to make a prediction without more context, but the next statement could be something like this:

```
if (arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p()) {
    // do something
}
```

This would call the function `arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p` and then check if the returned value is true or false."
GCC,arc,419,"</s>


The next statement will likely be closing curly bracket (}) to end the function."
GCC,arc,420,The next statement is "return (bool)".
GCC,arc,421,"</s>


end if;"
GCC,arc,422,The code will continue to execute within the else statement.
GCC,arc,423,This code snippet will move on to the next line of code and execute it.
GCC,arc,424,"</s>

 state -> temp = /*huh*/
GET_MODE ( PATTERN ( insn ) )"
GCC,arc,425,"The code will check if the pattern of the current instruction is a conditional execution. Depending on whether the instruction is from the target or not, it will assert that the inverse condition code is equal to the condition code retrieved from the pattern. If the instruction is not a conditional execution, the state will be set to a specific value indicated by <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,426,return false;
GCC,arc,427,The next statement of this code snippet would be to execute the for loop.
GCC,arc,428,if ( ! IS_POWEROF2_P ( ival + <NUM_LIT> ) ) return false ;
GCC,arc,429,"No prediction can be made as the next statement could potentially be anything. Each if statement evaluates a condition and if true, returns true. The code snippet could potentially have more if statements or could move on to a different section of code entirely."
GCC,arc,430,"} else if ( GET_CODE ( addr ) == REG ) { if ( REGNO ( addr ) != <NUM_LIT> ) return false ; if ( rtx_equal_p

to stack_pointer_rtx, XEXP ( addr , <NUM_LIT> ) )"
GCC,arc,431,The next statement will be the closing bracket "}".
GCC,arc,432,"</s>

    }"
GCC,arc,433,"if ( arc_compute_millicode_save_restore_regs ( gmask , frame_info ) ) frame_info -> save_return_addr = true ;"
GCC,arc,434,fn_type |= ARC_FUNCTION_SWP
GCC,arc,435,gcc_unreachable ( ) ;
GCC,arc,436,"if ( regno == <NUM_LIT> ) {
		end_reg = <NUM_LIT> ; 
	}"
GCC,arc,437,"The next statement would be:

return <NUM_LIT>;"
GCC,arc,438,"if ((l1 || l2) && (m1 || m2) && (s1 || s2)) {
  // do something
}"
GCC,arc,439,"<s>

Additional initialization statements for the arc_regno_reg_class array. The example code sets the values for various register classes, including GENERAL_REGS, DOUBLE_REGS, and SIMD_VR_REGS, to certain registers such as R30_REG and R40_REG."
GCC,arc,440,">

The next statement might be: ""if ( MEM_P (x) ) return x ;"""
GCC,arc,441,The next statement will be: return x;
GCC,arc,442,"The next statement could potentially be a conditional statement or a return statement, depending on the values of t1 and t2. If t1 and t2 have values, the statement could be ""return gen_rtx_PLUS (GET_MODE (op), t1, t2);"" If t1 and t2 are both null or false, the statement could be ""break;""."
GCC,arc,443,"The next statement will likely be a return statement, since the code is currently within a switch statement. The code inside the switch statement is checking for the case PLUS, so the return statement will likely be related to that case. It is possible that the return statement will be used to return a gen_rtx_PLUS object, as that is the function being called in the code snippet."
GCC,arc,444,"""Otherwise, return false."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,445,"offset = UNITS_PER_WORD * ( irq_ctrl_saved . irq_save_last_reg + <NUM_LIT> + irq_ctrl_saved . irq_save_blink + irq_ctrl_saved . irq_save_lpcount ) ; tmp = plus_constant ( Pmode , stack_pointer_rtx , - <NUM_LIT> * offset ) ; tmp = gen_rtx_SET ( stack_pointer_rtx , tmp ) ; RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( tmp ) = <NUM_LIT> ; XVECEXP ( par , <NUM_LIT> , j ++ ) = tmp ; offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD ; if ( irq_ctrl_saved"
GCC,arc,446,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context for the code snippet. However, it is likely that the code will continue to manipulate the rtx variable and potentially return a result."
GCC,arc,447,The code will set the value of the specified register number to a new SImode value and store it in the parallel expression p.
GCC,arc,448,The next statement would be to set the "MEM_VOLATILE_P" flag for the "mem" object to true.
GCC,arc,449,gcc_assert (afi->return_addr_offset == -offset)
GCC,arc,450,"rtx symbol = XEXP ( rtl , <NUM_LIT> ) ; rtx section = gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF ( <STR_LIT> , sec_name , 0 ) ; XEXP ( symbol , <NUM_LIT> ) = section ; } }

The next statement is a conditional statement that checks if the tree code of the declaration is equal to VAR_DECL."
GCC,arc,451,regno <
GCC,arc,452,"regno > gmask && regno >= ENTER_LEAVE_END_REG ; regno -- ) {

return true;"
GCC,arc,453,"</s>


The next statement will check the condition of ""return true"" for the given code snippet."
GCC,arc,454,Emit a code inside the if statement if the condition is true.
GCC,arc,455,"<STR_LIT>

""There is an error on line 5.0."""
GCC,arc,456,None
GCC,arc,457,"emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( out , gen_rtx_AND ( SImode , gen_lowpart_common ( SImode , newval ) , mask ) ) ) ;"
GCC,arc,458,The next statement will likely be another line of code that is not provided in the snippet. It is also possible that this is the last statement in the code.
GCC,arc,459,"<NUM_LIT>

asm_fprintf(asm_out_file, <STR_LIT>, TARGET_OPTFPE ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT>) ; if (TARGET_V2) asm_fprintf(asm_out_file, <STR_LIT>, (arc_tune < ARC_TUNE_CORE_3) ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT>) ; else next_statement;"
GCC,arc,460,"<NUM_LIT> )

if (arc_tp_regno != -4) {
    asm_fprintf(asm_out_file, ""%s"", 1);
} else {
    asm_fprintf(asm_out_file, ""%s"", 0);
}"
GCC,arc,461,"</s>

""Prescan has been initialized and INSN_ADDRESSES is executed on insn."""
GCC,arc,462,arc_ccfsm_current.INSN_ADDRESSES ( INSN_UID (insn) );
GCC,arc,463,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
GCC,arc,464,"}

ret = const0_rtx;"
GCC,arc,465,"words not equal to null, cum is rounded according to the specified mode and type."
GCC,arc,466,"}
<s> if ( lookup_attribute ( <STR_LIT> , attrs ) ) print ""Attribute found"" ;"
GCC,arc,467,"<s>

True"
GCC,arc,468,"return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,469,The next statement will likely involve the promotion of a mode based on the value type and whether it is an integral type or offset type.
GCC,arc,470,"gen_rtx_fmt_ee(code, GET_MODE(cond), copy_rtx(XEXP(cond, <NUM_LIT>)), copy_rtx(XEXP(cond, <NUM_LIT>)))"
GCC,arc,471,"assert (GET_CODE ( XEXP ( cond , <NUM_LIT> ) ) == code);"
GCC,arc,472,"tree attrs = tree_cons ( get_identifier ( <STR_LIT> ) , NULL_TREE , TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( fntype ) ) ;"
GCC,arc,473,TREE_TYPE(*node) = fntype;
GCC,arc,474,"* no_add_attrs = false ; }

return NULL;"
GCC,arc,475,"This function defines a static tree called arc_handle_fndecl_attribute with input parameters 'node', 'name', 'args', 'flags', and 'no_add_attrs'."
GCC,arc,476,* no_add_attrs = true ; // This statement would set the variable no_add_attrs to true.
GCC,arc,477,"} </s>

}"
GCC,arc,478,"if ( regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER &amp;&amp; TARGET_HARD_REGS &amp; 1U &lt;&lt; regno ) {
The next statement will be a return statement that checks if the target hard registers  include the given register number for the specified machine mode. If it does, the statement will return true. Otherwise, it will return false."
GCC,arc,479,"</s>


If the GET_MODE_SIZE function's result is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, then the code will move on to the next statement."
GCC,arc,480,0
GCC,arc,481,gcc_unreachable ();
GCC,arc,482,The code will continue with a call to the function arc_init_reg_tables() and then proceed to set the elements of the arc_punct_chars array to specific values.
GCC,arc,483,The next statement could be an error statement regarding floating point precision based on the specific target settings.
GCC,arc,484,"The next statement could be:
 <s> emit_insn (gen_label_ref ( fndecl , GET_MODE (fnaddr))) ;"
GCC,arc,485,"This code snippet checks if the 'from' and 'to' values are equal to certain register numbers and returns some calculations based on those values. Next, the code will return the value of ' cfun -> machine -> frame_info . total_size - ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . extra_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . reg_size )' if the conditions in the second 'if' statement are met."
GCC,arc,486,arc_init_timer();
GCC,arc,487,"}
The code will execute the statement ""machine->fn_type = ARC_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN ;"" and then return the ""machine"" variable."
GCC,arc,488,arc_mode_class [ i ] = ( <NUM_LIT> << ( int ) V_MODE ) ;
GCC,arc,489,"if (type == NONE) {
  return cost;
}"
GCC,arc,490,"}
return 0;"
GCC,arc,491,"if ( cfun ) arc_ccfsm_at_label ( prefix , labelno , & arc_ccfsm_current )"
GCC,arc,492,"if the condition of CALL_P ( insn ) is true, then return <STR_LIT>, else return NULL"
GCC,arc,493,"'
None"
GCC,arc,494,"return false; }

if (DECL_POINTER_ALIGN (decl) == 0) return false;"
GCC,arc,495,The next statement could be to check if the attribute exists in the type attributes using the function lookup_attribute.
GCC,arc,496,"1. If the lookup_attribute function returns true, then return true.
2. Otherwise, return false."
GCC,arc,497,The code will return TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS.
GCC,arc,498,The next statement is "return TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS ;"
GCC,arc,499,"""This code snippet checks if the code retrieved from sym_ref is a symbolic reference. If it is not, then it returns false. If it is, then the code checks if it is a long call and if the target allows long calls, or if it is not a short or medium call."""
GCC,arc,500,"</s>

The next statement could be a conditional statement, such as an ""if"" or ""else if"" statement, that checks for a specific condition and executes a certain code block if the condition is met. It could also be a ""return"" statement that ends the function and returns a specific value."
GCC,arc,501,"if ( lookup_attribute ( ""STR_LIT"", attrs ) ) return true;"
GCC,arc,502,if ( !attrs) return false;
GCC,arc,503,The next statement would be to execute the if statement and return either true or false depending on the result.
GCC,arc,504,"}

returns true"
GCC,arc,505,"</s>

The next statement would be to close the curly braces and return false if none of the if statements evaluated to true."
GCC,arc,506,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be a call to a function or a conditional statement."
GCC,arc,507,"""If the next non-note, non-debug instruction after the label is recognized and marked as a memoized instruction with a value greater than or equal to <NUM_LIT>, then return <NUM_LIT>. Otherwise, return the log of align_labels at the designated level."""
GCC,arc,508,"The next statement will be another ""if"" statement, checking if the symbol referenced by XEXP (XEXP (x, <NUM_LIT>), <NUM_LIT>) has a TLS model and is not a function."
GCC,arc,509,"The next statement is likely to be another ""case"" statement. Based on the previous cases, it could be another mode being checked for, such as ""case E_<MODE>: return <MODE_STATEMENT> ;"""
GCC,arc,510,"The next statement is likely a closing brace, indicating the end of the function or code block."
GCC,arc,511,"</s>


return orig_x;"
GCC,arc,512,"return gen
 cgtnew ( GEN_INT 0 , oldx )

""Unrecognized target architecture. Please check the validity of the specified address."""
GCC,arc,513,The next statement will be "} else if (GET_CODE(x) == CONST)" after the existing "if (GET_CODE(x) == PLUS)" statement.  It will allow for the case where x is a CONST in addition to being a PLUS expression.
GCC,arc,514,"QUAL_ARG ( SET_SRC ( addr ) , BITS )

The next statement will most likely be:
{ BITS }"
GCC,arc,515,The next statement could be a break statement or a return statement.
GCC,arc,516,"The next statement will be a closing curly brace, which indicates the end of the ""else if"" statement."
GCC,arc,517,return arc_call_tls_get_addr
GCC,arc,518,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be ""return gen_rtx_PLUS ( Pmode , gen_rtx_REG ( Pmode , arc_tp_regno ) , addr ) ;""."
GCC,arc,519,"If arc_lra_p returns a boolean value, then the code will likely continue"
GCC,arc,520,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the surrounding code.
GCC,arc,521,The next statement is a '}' indicating the end of the function.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,522,The next statement is likely to be a return statement with a boolean value indicating whether the conditions are met. For example: "return true;" or "return false;".
GCC,arc,523,The next statement will be "return true".
GCC,arc,524,"The next statement will check if the function's corresponding machine has the flag ""save_return_addr"" set and return true if it is, and false if it is not."
GCC,arc,525,"if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (INSN)) == ADDR_DIFF) {
  return true;
}


return false;"
GCC,arc,526,"<s>

The next statement will likely be the end of the snippet or a continuation of the code."
GCC,arc,527,The function will return the boolean value "true".
GCC,arc,528,ret = 0;
GCC,arc,529,"""int sum = intval + neg_intval ;"""
GCC,arc,530,"}

The next statement will most likely be a call to the sprintf function using the variable buf and the format string <STR_LIT> with fname as the parameter."
GCC,arc,531,return buf;
GCC,arc,532,"var reg_type = reg_class.asm flee

end"
GCC,arc,533,There isn't enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement.
GCC,arc,534,The next statement could be a conditional statement or a return statement based on whether the comparison between the two arguments evaluates to true or false.
GCC,arc,535,"if (model == RELEASE) {
     memset(&arc_atomic, 0, sizeof(arc_atomic));
    }
</s>

The code will check if the model is of type RELEASE and if true, it will clear/set the arc_atomic variable to 0."
GCC,arc,536,"}

emit_insn ( gen_memory_barrier ( ) )


<s> return;"
GCC,arc,537,"The next statement is:

pat = PATTERN (dlay);"
GCC,arc,538,"</s>""

It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet."
GCC,arc,539,It is impossible to determine the next statement without additional context or code.
GCC,arc,540,"}</s>

The next statement in this code snippet would be to check if the given memory model requires an atomic barrier and if so, generate an instruction for a memory barrier."
GCC,arc,541,"if ( need_atomic_barrier_p ( model , true ) ) emit_insn ( gen_thread_fence ( ) ) ;"
GCC,arc,542,"The next statement would likely be another case or a default case, as the current code snippet is within a switch statement and the break statement indicates the end of a case. Alternatively, the code could continue with another line of code after the break statement, but this depends on the context and the broader code structure."
GCC,arc,543,"}

The next statement would likely be another if statement, possibly checking if state is equal to destDx."
GCC,arc,544,"}

1"
GCC,arc,545,"</s>

""If the statement evaluates to 'true', the function will return r. Otherwise, the statement will move to the next line in the switch case statement, defaulting to the gcc_unreachable function."""
GCC,arc,546,NULL_RTX
GCC,arc,547,The code snippet will continue iterating through the for loop and check for additional uses of x.
GCC,arc,548,"</s>

If (get_code(op) == LT || get_code(op) == LE ) {
    op0 = cmp0;
    op1 = cmp1;
  }"
GCC,arc,549,"</s>

<s> //Add the code for arc reorganization </s>"
GCC,arc,550,"In the next line of code, the program will begin a reorganization of the loops using the specified setting and calling the arc_doloop_hooks."
GCC,arc,551,"The next statement could be a continuation of the for loop that assigns values to regno, off, reg, and mem variables."
GCC,arc,552,#VALUE!
GCC,arc,553,The next statement will be: gcc_assert ( regno != <NUM_LIT2> ) ;
GCC,arc,554,"</s>
Rest zize of const statement array"
GCC,arc,555,return count + 1;
GCC,arc,556,"<s>

At this point, the code will likely check if the variable ""size"" is equal to or greater than either <NUM_LIT> or <NUM_LIT>, depending on the value of ""size"" and the boolean expression ""( TARGET_V2 ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> )""."
GCC,arc,557,"RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( XVECEXP ( insn , <NUM_LIT> , indx ) ) = <NUM_LIT>

""XVECEXP ( insn , <NUM_LIT> , indx ) = gen_rtx_CAND ( <s> , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"""
GCC,arc,558,"reg = GEN_INT ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; gmask = gmask & ~ ( <NUM_LIT> << regno ) ; }

The code snippet looks like it is setting up instructions to save the return address and other necessary data in specific registers and memory locations. The next statement could be another instruction to save a specific register or a function call to save the entire frame."
GCC,arc,559,If (gmask & (1 << (i - 1))) == 1 then save_mode = DImode;
GCC,arc,560,<NUM_LIT-1>
GCC,arc,561,"}
if (cfun->machine->arc_reorg_started) {
  return false;
} else {
  return true;
}"
GCC,arc,562,return priority + <NUM_STRING> ;
GCC,arc,563,"""else { return priority }"""
GCC,arc,564,break ;
GCC,arc,565,"case E_SY
L
C

sri->icode = in_p ? CODE_FOR_reload_sy_load : CODE_FOR_reload_sy_store;"
GCC,arc,566,"if (store_p) {
  emit_move_insn (scratch, addr);
}"
GCC,arc,567,"The next statement will be ""if (!store_p) emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (mem, reg)) ;""."
GCC,arc,568,"return CC_GTmode ; case LE : case UNGT : return CC_GEmode ; case GT : case UNLE : return CC_LTmode ; case GE : case UNLT : return CC_LEmode ; case ORDERED : case UNORDERED : return CC_ZNmode ; default : gcc_unreachable ( ) ; }
if (TARGET_ARGONAUT_SET && ((mode == SFmode && TARGET_SPFP) || (mode == DFmode && TARGET_DPFP))) {
  switch (op) {
    case LTGT:
    case UNEQ:
      return CC_FPXmode;
    case LT:
    case"
GCC,arc,569,"<s>

Variable renaming would be necessary to determine the exact next statement, but based on context, it is likely that the code will check the type of attribute associated with the instruction (insn) and return a boolean value based on the comparison to TYPE_COMPARE."
GCC,arc,570,"}



<NUM_LIT> is replaced with the value of ""first_reg_offset""."
GCC,arc,571,"It is difficult to predict the exact statement without more context, but it is likely that the next statement will involve the comparison of the ""offset"" variable to two numerical literals."
GCC,arc,572,"if (is_short) {
    // do something
} else {
    // do something else
}

// end of code snippet"
GCC,arc,573,return l_tmpl;
GCC,arc,574,"The next statement is likely to be a return statement, as the name and formatting of the function suggest it is a simple helper function that returns a value of type reg_class_t."
GCC,arc,575,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without the rest of the code or information about the purpose of the snippet. Please provide more context in order to make a prediction.
GCC,arc,576,"if (mod_f == MEMMODEL_RELAXED) {
  emit_label(label2);
} else {
  emit_label(label1);
}"
GCC,arc,577,"maskx = 8 << (__builtin_ffs(mask) - 8); emit_insn(gen_rtx_SET(operands[8], gen_rtx_IOR(SImode, op1, GEN_INT(maskx))));"
GCC,arc,578,The next statement would likely be a for loop that iterates through a range of numbers.
GCC,arc,579,"The next statement would be the closing bracket, marking the end of the code snippet."
GCC,arc,580,"if (GET_CODE(out_addr) == SUBREG)
  out_addr = SUBREG_REG(out_addr);"
GCC,arc,581,"The return statement will check whether the in_addr and out_addr expressions are equivalent using the exp_equiv_p function, and then return the result."
GCC,arc,582,return false;
GCC,arc,583,assert (x != NULL);
GCC,arc,584,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context.
GCC,arc,585,This code snippet is performing an assertion to check if the code and note kinds of the given label are either a code label or a deleted label.
GCC,arc,586,"</s>

`s}<s>`"
GCC,arc,587,The next statement could be a return statement or an if/else statement to determine whether unalign should be toggled or not.
GCC,arc,588,"The code snippet ends with a return statement, indicating that the function will return the value stored in the variable lo0."
GCC,arc,589,"</s>

If the condition of the if statement is not satisfied, then the code will return the value stored in the variable note after calling the function find_reg_note with the arguments branch, REG_BR_PROB, and <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,590,"If the note variable is not null, the function will return the value of the note."
GCC,arc,591,": The code

will be able to generate a constant of type Pmode using the location and unspec provided."
GCC,arc,592,"""If the symbol is not small and the default use of anchors is not needed for the symbol, then return true."""
GCC,arc,593,"</s>

The next statement would be the end of the code snippet, as it is the end of the if statement and there are no other statements following."
GCC,arc,594,"return default_use_by_pieces_infrastructure_p ( size , align , op , speed_p ) ;"
GCC,arc,595,"</s>
case E_V16QImode : return TARGET_SIMD_SET ;"
GCC,arc,596,"default: return TARGET_PLUS_DMPY;
}"
GCC,arc,597,"The next statement will likely be:
return get_attr_length ( insn ) & <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,598,return true
GCC,arc,599,"case SET: 
	return x;"
GCC,arc,600,"<s> else if ( GET_CODE ( dest ) == AND ) dest = XEXP ( dest , XEXP ( dest , <NUM_LIT> ) && pc_rtx ? <NUM_LIT> : <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
GCC,arc,601,"if (GET_CODE(dest) == LABEL) dest = SET_SRC(XVECEXP(dest, <NUM_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>));"
GCC,arc,602,"The next statement will be a curly bracket closing the switch statement:
}"
GCC,arc,603,Error: "Invalid syntax"
GCC,arc,604,"if (align != <NUM_LIT>) { 
    return false; 
}
return true;"
GCC,arc,605,">

This code snippet will create a new register note with the expression REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR as its value and add it to the list of register notes for the instruction called 'insn'. It will then call the function validate_change to check if the change is valid, passing in the instruction, the list of register notes, the newly created note, and the integer value <NUM_LIT> as parameters."
GCC,arc,606,It will return the simplified value of the subregister based on the target endianness.
GCC,arc,607,The next statement is probably the opening curly bracket "{".
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,608,"The next statement will be the end curly bracket, indicating the end of the function."
GCC,arc,609,"""Create a pattern for the shift using the given operator and operands and the gen_shift_si3 or gen_shift_si3_loop function."""
GCC,arc,610,This code snippet adds a register branch probability note for a jump instruction with a profile probability that is very unlikely.
GCC,arc,611,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
GCC,arc,612,"</s>

The next statement will return the result of calling the function ""arc_predicate_delay_insns"" with no arguments."
GCC,arc,613,It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context or information about the function being executed.
GCC,arc,614,"""Get the numerical value of expression x as the destination constant for the XEXP function."""
GCC,arc,615,"if

It is likely that there will be a continuation of the for loop, potentially with more code inside."
GCC,arc,616,"This code snippet is checking if the offset value is divisible by 4 and if it is not, it will return a null RTX value."
GCC,arc,617,This code snippet checks if the offset is a multiple of some constant and returns either NULL_RTX or the result of the frame_move function depending on the value of offset.
GCC,arc,618,"The next statement will most likely be:
 
RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( x ) = <NUM_LIT> ;"
GCC,arc,619,"This code snippet appears to be incomplete, so it is difficult to predict the next statement. It is possible that the next statement could be another assignment or a function call using the variable ""tmp""."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,arc,620,"""add_reg_note ( insn , REG_INC , reg ) ;"""
GCC,arc,621,"?>

set reg as hard_frame_pointer_rtx"
GCC,arc,622,"add_reg_note(insn, REG_CFA_DEF_CFA, plus_constant(Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, GET_MODE_SIZE(GET_MODE(reg)) + offset));"
GCC,arc,623,The next statement will likely be the closing bracket for the if-else statement.
GCC,arc,624,return addr;
GCC,arc,625,"This code snippet likely belongs to a function that is adding the value of the stack pointer to an offset and returning the result. The next statement will probably involve using the return value in some way, such as assigning it to a variable or passing it as an argument to another function. Alternatively, the next statement could be a closing bracket if this is the last line of the function."
GCC,arc,626,"</s>

<s> return frame_stack + offset ; </s>"
GCC,arc,627,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the context and purpose of the code."
GCC,arc,628,The next statement is likely to be a function definition or a return statement that completes the gate function.
GCC,arc,629,"Possible next statement could be:
 return acc1;"
GCC,arc,630,"""Return the result of the gen_rtx_REG function with parameters SImode and the value of TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN being either <NUM_LIT> or <NUM_LIT>."""
GCC,arc,631,"}

The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
GCC,arc,632,"The next statement would likely be a return statement, either returning true or false, depending on the results of the previous conditions."
GCC,arc,633,if ( REGNO ( base ) == cur_base ) return false;
GCC,arc,634,"}
gcc_unreachable( )"
GCC,arc,635,align =  DECL_ALIGN ( decl ) ;
GCC,arc,636,"return get_symbol_alignment ( XEXP ( x , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;

This code snippet may return the alignment of a symbol referenced by the variable 'x' or the alignment of a constant value depending on the code returned by the GET_CODE() function."
GCC,arc,637,The code snippet will end with a statement assigning the start label of the loop to the JUMP_LABEL of the last generated jump instruction.
GCC,arc,638,"if ( entry_after -> rtx_next ) { {
This code snippet iterates through basic blocks of a function and performs optimizations for loops, if any."
GCC,arc,639,"If the reg is not a register, the function will return NULL_RTX."
GCC,arc,640,The next statement will likely involve an assignment of a value to the variable "reg".
GCC,arc,641,"case <NUM_LIT> : lpcount = <NUM_LIT> ; break ; default : warning ( OPT_mirq_ctrl_saved_ , <STR_LIT> , str , decode_reg_name ( str ) ) ; return ; } }</s>

warning ( OPT_mirq_ctrl_saved_ , <STR_LIT> , str , decode_reg_name ( str ) ) ; return ;"
GCC,arc,642,"}

The next statement in this code snippet is a switch statement starting with the keyword ""switch"", followed by a case statement with one of the cases being <NUM_LIT> and the other case being <NUM_LIT>."
GCC,arc,643,"""insn = get_insns() ;"""
GCC,arc,644,"The next statement could be:
pat = SET_SRC(pat);"
GCC,arc,645,"""return true;"""
GCC,arc,646,">

break"
GCC,arc,647,return new arc_ifcvt_pass(ctxt);
GCC,arc,648,"}</s>

The function will create and return a new instance of the pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns class using the given context."
GCC,arc,649,The next statement is: return false;
GCC,arc,650,"<s>


The next statement will most likely be a closing curly brace (}). This signifies the end of the current code block and returns control to the previous code block."
GCC,arc,651,The next statement likely involves checking the type of instruction and/or branching to different parts of the code depending on the outcome of that check.
GCC,arc,652,"The next statement will likely be a return statement, either true or false depending on the output of the if statement."
GCC,arc,653,"""return true;"""
GCC,arc,654,The next statement could be a closing curly brace (} end of shiftloop code block).
GCC,arc,655,"instruction insn_next = NEXT_INSN ( insn,9,1 );

<s> if ( insn_next == nullptr ) return;"
GCC,arc,656,"Short

return;"
GCC,arc,657,The offset is now compared to an arbitrary number.
GCC,arc,658,return <NUM_LIT> ;
GCC,arc,659,"return LIM_CALLS (PASS_ARC_IFCVT, ctxt);"
GCC,arc,660,return cfg_changes
GCC,arc,661,"</s>

It is difficult to predict the next statement without knowing more information about the code and its context. It is possible that the next statement could be a function definition or declaration, a conditional statement, or a loop, among other possibilities."
GCC,arc,662,"// Perform predicate delay on ARCompact instructions

std::cout << ""Predicate delay successfully performed on ARCompact instructions."" << std::endl;"
GCC,arc,663,The next statement is: return insn;
GCC,arc,664,operands[<NUM_LIT>] = tmp;
GCC,arc,665,"}

operands[<NUM_LIT>] = operands[<NUM_LIT>];"
GCC,arc,666,"operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ; operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = gen_rtx_PLUS ( SImode , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ;operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] = gen_rtx_PLUS ( SImode , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] , operands [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ;"
GCC,arc,667,"}

The code will check if the value is greater than or equal to two different numerical literals and will perform certain operations based on those conditions."
GCC,arc,668,The code snippet will return false.
GCC,arc,669,"return <STR_LIT> ;

<STR_LIT>"
GCC,arc,670,"</NUM_LIT>

There is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement. We would need to know the values of the variables and what functions they are pointing to in order to make a prediction."
GCC,arc,671,"}

p (4) = ( func_ptr ) - <NUM_LIT>"
GCC,arc,672,"</s>

This code iterates through a list of destructors and calls each one in succession."
GCC,arc,673,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the code snippet or the values of the variables involved. The statement could vary based on the specific code and values being used.
GCC,arc,674,"}</s>

The next statement is ( * p ) ( ) ; which calls the function pointed to by p."
GCC,arc,675,p = &func_ptr;
GCC,arc,676,"""This code declares a variable named 'p' of type 'func_ptr'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,0,"}

CallToOld -> eraseFromParent ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1,The next statement would be "return NewFunc;".
LLVM,NVPTX,2,NvvmEntryPointMetadata will be returned.
LLVM,NVPTX,3,The next statement could be the end of the code snippet or possibly another line of code that follows the return statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,4,"// Do some global offset computations

I am not able to predict the next statement as there is not enough information given."
LLVM,NVPTX,5,This code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. More information is needed to know the specific code and its purpose.
LLVM,NVPTX,6,"""Create an if statement to check if a specific condition is met."""
LLVM,NVPTX,7,"assert ( ((llvm_intrinsic not available) ||  llvm_intrinsic_return_type = llvm_intrinsic_pointer_type) && <STRING_LITERAL> <STRING_LITERAL>) ; 
EntryPointMetadata = getEntryPointMetadata(M) ; 
addImplicitParameterToCallers(M, llvm_intrinsic, nullptr) ; 
assert (llvm_intrinsic->use_empty() && <STRING_LITERAL>) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,8,"""The function <CODE>ProcessFunction</CODE> is called using the function <CODE>getValue()</CODE> on the constant obtained from <CODE>FuncConstant</CODE>, and if the returned value is not null, the variable <CODE>Changed</CODE> is set to true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,9,"}

It is likely that the next statement will be a closing curly brace, as it appears to be part of a function definition."
LLVM,NVPTX,10,"The next statement is likely to be the body of the LocalAccessorToSharedMemory function, which may include calls to other functions and/or variable declarations."
LLVM,NVPTX,11,The next statement could be a function definition or implementation using the 'LocalAccessorToSharedMemory' class.
LLVM,NVPTX,12,"The code will check if NewFunc exists and if it does, it will set the variable Changed to true and replace the operand at position <NUM_LIT> in MetadataNode with the constant metadata for NewFunc. The snippet ends here and the rest of the code is not included."
LLVM,NVPTX,13,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without more context. It may depend on the inputs to the function, the function definition, and other factors."
LLVM,NVPTX,14,if (Current != Pool.end() && *Current == "hello") { continue; }
LLVM,NVPTX,15,"There are additional statements following the while loop, possibly involving the 'Pool' variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,16,std::cout << *Str;
LLVM,NVPTX,17,// The managed string pool constructor has been initialized.
LLVM,NVPTX,18,It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete.
LLVM,NVPTX,19,"The next statement is likely to be the end of the switch statement, followed by a closing curly brace and possibly other code outside of the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,20,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and purpose of the code snippet. The following statement could vary based on the purpose of the code and the language in which it is written.
LLVM,NVPTX,21,";
<

 A closing curly brace should be added for proper code formatting."
LLVM,NVPTX,22,return createNVVMReflectPass(SmVersion + 1);
LLVM,NVPTX,23,"False

{
return False"
LLVM,NVPTX,24,"This code snippet appears to be incomplete and contains an error. It is missing a closing tag for the ""s"" element and it is unclear what ""ISA_LIT"" refers to. Therefore, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,25,AU.addPreserved<StackProtector>();
LLVM,NVPTX,26,<s> AU .addRequired < AddressSanitizer > ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,27,"Sorry, I cannot provide a reasonable prediction without more context."
LLVM,NVPTX,28,AU.addRequired<MachineRegisterInfo>();
LLVM,NVPTX,29,"return

""The end of the code snippet."""
LLVM,NVPTX,30,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement, as the code snippet is incomplete."
LLVM,NVPTX,31,"} 

<I>// Perform some transformation on the allocaInst

This snippet is predicting that the code will perform some transformation on the allocaInst object. This could potentially include altering its properties or values, or inserting it into a different part of the code. It is likely that this transformation will be done within the if statement, as that is where the allocaInst is being checked for and manipulated."
LLVM,NVPTX,32,"</s>

AU.addRequired<DataLayoutPass>();"
LLVM,NVPTX,33,"""Function :: iterator I = function . begin ( ) ; TerminatorInst * secondTerminatorInst = ( I ++ ) -> getTerminator ( ) ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,34,AU.addRequired<CallGraphWrapperPass>();
LLVM,NVPTX,35,AU.addRequired<LiveVariables>() ;
LLVM,NVPTX,36,"}}

The statement is likely to add the required TargetData for analysis usage."
LLVM,NVPTX,37,"if (AddMandatoryReversablePass) { AU.addRequired</s>

<TypeTraits<std::unique_ptr<LowerType>>>()() }

AU.addRequired<LowerType>();"
LLVM,NVPTX,38,AU.addRequired<MachineFunctionAnalysis>();
LLVM,NVPTX,39,"// Function Pass constructor  

// Function Pass implementation goes here"
LLVM,NVPTX,40,"</s>

// The function pass <ID> will pass an argument of <ISA_LIT>AllocaHoisting."
LLVM,NVPTX,41,"double

The code will continue to check the type of the constant expression and add the appropriate symbol or zeros to the aggregate buffer."
LLVM,NVPTX,42,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,43,"""delete [] gv_array ; return ret ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,44,"The next statement is:

i = 0;"
LLVM,NVPTX,45,OutStreamer . AddComment ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,46,"StrongId

printReturnValStr ( F ,O ) ; O << * Mang -> getSymbol ( F ) << <STR_LIT> ; emitFunctionParamList ( F , O ) ; StrongId ; O << * getSymbol ( StrongId ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,47,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,48,"break ; }

The next statement will be a break statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,49,"O << <STR_LIT> ; break ; } } else { O << <STR_LIT> ; } } Predict the next statement of this code snippet is
<<Mang >> <STR_LIT> if (Mang is not null) . If (Mang is null) then the next statement is
<<STR_LIT> if (Mang is null) ."
LLVM,NVPTX,50,"<NL>

The next statement will be:
""MCTargetStreamer.emitInstruction(Inst, OS);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,51,">

 This code is checking for a valid file name. If the current scope does not contain a file name, the function will return. Otherwise, it will create a SmallString and add the directory and file name to it. If the file name is not found in the file name map, the function will also return. Finally, if a certain condition is met, the function will emit text from the source file. After that, a temporary stringstream will be created with information about the file name, line number, and column number."
LLVM,NVPTX,52,The next statement would be to check if the directory name is not empty and if the filename is not an absolute path.
LLVM,NVPTX,53,"This code will end with an ""llvm_unreachable"" statement, indicating that there is an error and the program will not continue."
LLVM,NVPTX,54,O << "The element size is: " << ElementSize << ". <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,55,The next statement will be the end of the function call and will return the virtual register name for the specified inputs.
LLVM,NVPTX,56,"</s>

<s>
if (isVec) { </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,57,"</s>

The next statement would check if Ty is a FunctionType and if it is, it would return the preferred alignment set for a pointer type. If Ty is not a FunctionType, it would return the preferred alignment set for the type of Ty."
LLVM,NVPTX,58,The next statement will be "case Type :: FloatTyID : return <STR_LIT> ;" or "case Type :: DoubleTyID : return <STR_LIT> ;" depending on the type of the variable "Ty".
LLVM,NVPTX,59,The code will return the reader object created by the LineReader function with the given filename.
LLVM,NVPTX,60,The next statement will return the value of the 'reader' variable.
LLVM,NVPTX,61,"Since there is a "";"" at the end of the second line, the next statement is likely to start on a new line. It is not possible to predict the exact statement as it depends on the context and the purpose of the code. However, it is likely that the code will continue with another expression or operation involving the objects created in the first two lines."
LLVM,NVPTX,62,"""Expr"" variable assigned to reference expression created using ""Symbol"" and ""OutContext"" values."
LLVM,NVPTX,63,O << <ISA_LIT> << "RegClassStr(RC) << "mapped_vr" << report_fatal_error(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,NVPTX,64,"MCOp = MCOperand :: CreateExpr ( <ISA_LIT> FloatMCExpr :: CreateConstantFPLongDouble ( Val , OutContext ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,65,"{          auto op = MI -> getOperand ( i ) ;}

If the current index, i, is not equal to the number of operands, e, then increment i by 1 and get the operand at that index from MI."
LLVM,NVPTX,66,"if (MO.isImm()) {
MCOp = MCOperand::createImm(MO.getImm());
}

MCOp = MCOperand::createReg(MI->getRegOperand(i));

The MCOp variable will be set to the value of the MachineOperand's register operand, since it is not an immediate value."
LLVM,NVPTX,67,"temp . push_back ( GVar ) ; localDecls [ demotedFunc ] = temp ; } return ; }

if ( GVar -> hasPrivateLinkage ( ) ) { if ( ! strncmp ( GVar -> getName ( ) . data ( ) , <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> ) ) return ; if ( ! strncmp ( GVar -> getName ( ) . data ( ) , <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> ) ) return ; if ( GVar -> use_empty ( ) ) return ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,68,The next statement would be an if statement checking if the variable p currently holds a '.' character.
LLVM,NVPTX,69,"} }</s>

If none of the if statements are satisfied, the function will return."
LLVM,NVPTX,70,"}

The program will check if CPV is a constant integer, and if so, it will print the value of CI and return. If it is not a constant integer, it will check if it is a constant floating point number, and if so, it will call the printFPConstant function and return. If it is not a constant floating point number, it will check if it is a null pointer, and if so, it will print the string literal ""<STR_LIT>"" and return. If it is not a null pointer, it will check if it is a global value, and if so, it will print the symbol of"
LLVM,NVPTX,71,"The code will iterate through the subprogram entries and retrieve the filename and directory information for each. It will then append the directory to the filename if the filename is not absolute, and add the filename to the filenameMap. Finally, it will emit a Dwarf file directive with the corresponding index and filename."
LLVM,NVPTX,72,The next statement will be a conditional statement that checks if the current value of the iterator is a global variable being used in a definition.
LLVM,NVPTX,73,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,74,"<s>

if ( ! I->isTerminator( ) && allocFnSeen(caller, allocMap) ) continue;"
LLVM,NVPTX,75,The next statement could be: reader = null;
LLVM,NVPTX,76,"}

This code snippet appears to be defining an AsmPrinter class which has a function that overrides a base class function. The function body for this override deletes the reader object. Therefore, the next statement could potentially be the end of the function, marked by a closing curly brace, or it could be a continuation of the class definition. It could be a function declaration, another function override, or a closing curly brace to end the class definition. Without further context, it is difficult to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,77,"if(pos < size) {
    llvm_unreachable(""<STR_LIT>"");
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,78,"if ( IsNonGenericPointer ) { *else;
O << Name -> getName ( ) ; } else { O << <STR_LIT> << nSym ; } nSym ++ ; nextSymbolPos = symbolPosInBuffer [ nSym ] ; } O << <STR_LIT> ; O << (unsigned int) buffer [ pos ] ; } }

The next statement could be an ""else"" statement, since there is a possibility for an ""if"" statement to be closed within the current code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,79,"The next statement would be the end of the loop, as indicated by the closing bracket ""}""."
LLVM,NVPTX,80,"printModuleLevelGV ( Globals [ <NUM_LIT> ] , OS2 ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,81,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a closing brace '}'.
LLVM,NVPTX,82,"}


<NUM_LIT>, e = CPV -> getNumOperands ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,83,if ( ! LT . isLittleEndian ( ) ) { if ( ! <BOOL_LIT> ) return ; } ret
LLVM,NVPTX,84,"""This case statement is missing a break; statement."""
LLVM,NVPTX,85,"""This code snippet creates an array, adds elements to it, and then removes all elements from the global_list before finalizing."""
LLVM,NVPTX,86,nvptxSubtarget.getDvInterface() == recordAndEmitFilenames(M);
LLVM,NVPTX,87,"Considering currentFnSym is a pointer to the current function and printReturnValStr is a function that prints the return value of a given function, the next statement could potentially be ""printReturnValStr(F, O);"" to print the return value of the current function followed by ""O << *CurrentFnSym << <STR_LIT>;"" to print the name of the current function."
LLVM,NVPTX,88,"</s>

This code snippet does not provide enough information to predict the next statement. It could potentially contain any valid C/C++ statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,89,"emitDeclaration ( F , O ) ; break ; } } </s>

emitDeclaration ( F , O ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,90,"""The code will print the module-level global variables using the 'printModuleLevelGV' function."""
LLVM,NVPTX,91,"The next statement could be an assignment or manipulation of the vector gvars, such as accessing an element or pushing a new value to the vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,92,"}

The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to end the function: ""}"""
LLVM,NVPTX,93,"O << <VAR_REF> ;

OutStreamer . AddComment ( O.str() ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,94,"""Error: variable O is not defined."""
LLVM,NVPTX,95,"this snippet is printing out different messages based on the system configuration, so the next statement would likely be another if statement checking for a different system configuration or a series of print statements for different scenarios."
LLVM,NVPTX,96,O << nvptxSubtarget.getRegClassName() ;
LLVM,NVPTX,97,"Next, the code will emit the raw text from the OS variable using the OutStreamer function."
LLVM,NVPTX,98,"</s>

The code snippet will print out the given machine instruction using the provided printInstruction function."
LLVM,NVPTX,99,"</s>

if ( llvm :: getReqNTIDz ( F , reqntidz ) == false ) reqntidz = <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,100,The next statement could potentially be another comparison statement or another function call. It is impossible to determine the exact next statement without further context.
LLVM,NVPTX,101,The next statement will append a string literal to the "msg" string variable.
LLVM,NVPTX,102,"ElementSize = TD -> <NUM_LIT> ;

The next statement is: O << itostr ( ElementSize ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,103,"An additional if statement checking if the data type is equal to a struct or array, and if so, the ElementSize variable will be set to the size of that type."
LLVM,NVPTX,104,"temp << <COMMENT>

-----
LineReader is used to read lines in filename."
LLVM,NVPTX,105,"getOpenCLAlignment ( TD , STy )"
LLVM,NVPTX,106,"<s>


</s> return reader; <s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,107,else llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,108,"case <STR_LIT> : break

SIMPLE_STMT"
LLVM,NVPTX,109,<STR_LIT> :
LLVM,NVPTX,110,"case Instruction ::

The next statement could be a case statement for Instruction::UDiv to handle unsigned division."
LLVM,NVPTX,111,"return true << ""[""

;>"
LLVM,NVPTX,112,"return true
 True"
LLVM,NVPTX,113,"This code snippet is likely part of a function that prints out a floating point constant value. The next statement is likely to involve using the values of ""numHex"" and ""lead"" to convert the APFloat value to either a single or double precision floating point value. After this, the function may continue to print out the converted value to the raw_ostream."
LLVM,NVPTX,114,return;
LLVM,NVPTX,115,"} }</s>

The next statement would be ""return;"" if the ""else"" statement is executed since there is no further code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,116,"}

The next statement of this code snippet is checking whether the operand is a modifier and if it is not, it checks if the operand is an immediate and returns if it is equal to a certain value, or prints the operand and then calls the printOperand function again with the next operand number."
LLVM,NVPTX,117,O << * Mang -> getSymbol ( MO . getGlobal ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,118,"sscanf ( symbname + <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , & index ) ; O << <STR_LIT> ; } else { O << symbname ; } } }

The next statement could be a closing curly brace, as the code snippet is missing an ending bracket for the switch statement. Alternatively, it could also be a statement starting with ""default:"" which is typically used as a default case for a switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,119,"The next statement will likely be calling the ""printParamName"" function with the arguments (I, paramIndex, O)."
LLVM,NVPTX,120,"if (I->getType()->isPointerTy()) {

Dereference the pointer type."
LLVM,NVPTX,121,O << ".byte " ;
LLVM,NVPTX,122,"return ; } else { return                           

The next statement will be ""return""."
LLVM,NVPTX,123,"O << <STR_LIT>
if ( Imm > <NUM_LIT> ) O << vecelem [ Imm % <NUM_LIT> ] ;

---
if ( Imm < <NUM_LIT> ) O << <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,124,<END>
LLVM,NVPTX,125,"}

The code will continue to execute within the while loop until the value of ""theCurLine"" is equal to ""lineNum""."
LLVM,NVPTX,126,"}</s>

sys :: path :: append ( FullPathName , Filename ) ; Filename = FullPathName . str ( ) ;
The next statement in the code snippet will likely be: 
sys :: path :: append ( FullPathName , Filename ) ; Filename = FullPathName . str ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,127,DISubprogram SP = DISubprogram(*I)
LLVM,NVPTX,128,">



O << ""The number of registers is:"" << ""the number of registers in ISA"" << ""."""
LLVM,NVPTX,129,"ui != ue ; ++ui )

if (User *user = dyn_cast<User>(UI)) {
if (user->hasName() && ((user->getName().str() == ""foo"") || (user->getName().str() == ""bar"")))
  return true;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,130,if ( ! caller ) continue ;
LLVM,NVPTX,131,"<s>for ( auto user = ui -> getUser ( ) golden::

rocks"
LLVM,NVPTX,132,"The next statement could be either a closing curly brace (}) to end the if-else statements, or an additional if statement to check another condition."
LLVM,NVPTX,133,"}
The next statement will be: ""default: break;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,134,"const Type * innerType = Pty -> getElementType ( ) ;

The next statement could be:
""if (Pty == nullptr) return false;"" (checking if the global variable has a null type)"
LLVM,NVPTX,135,There will be no next statement because the code snippet is missing a closing bracket.
LLVM,NVPTX,136,"} } </s>

</s>The for loop will discover and insert dependent globals present in the operands of the User object V."
LLVM,NVPTX,137,"<i> global_list . insert ( global_list . end ( ) , gv_array [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) ; </i>"
LLVM,NVPTX,138,"""if Result is true, then the AsmPrinter will perform initialization on the global variable M."""
LLVM,NVPTX,139,The next statement in the code would be to close the curly brace and end the function.
LLVM,NVPTX,140,"emitFunctionBody ( F , O ) ;

The next statement will most likely be:

O << <STR_LIT> ; emitFunctionEnd ( F , O ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,141,"Print the value of the symbol returned by the function, followed by the string literal <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,142,"</s>

The code will check if the current user is an instruction and store it in the 'instr' variable, then it will get the parent basic block of the instruction and store it in the 'bb' variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,143,"Checking if the caller is already present in the map and if so, calling the emitDeclaration function and breaking out of the loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,144,The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to end the function definition. It would look something like: "}"
LLVM,NVPTX,145,O << "Hello world!";
LLVM,NVPTX,146,std::string res = O.str();
LLVM,NVPTX,147,"if ( ! F.getNumParams ( ) ) </s>

return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,148,The next statement is likely another assertion statement or a for loop.
LLVM,NVPTX,149,"List the first if condition

if ( NTM . getDrvInterface ( ) == <STR_LIT> )"
LLVM,NVPTX,150,"</s>

STI.setSchedModel(SchedModelFactory().createSchedModel(STI)); 

STI.setSchedModel(SchedModelFactory().createSchedModel(STI));"
LLVM,NVPTX,151,STI.getRegisterInfo()->getName(RegNo) is added as a comment to the OutStreamer.
LLVM,NVPTX,152,I cannot make a prediction without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,153,The next statement could be: O << <STR_LIT> << maxnreg << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,154,The next statement could be "llvm_unreachable(msg.c_str())".
LLVM,NVPTX,155,default : O << "Unknown address space " + llvm::Twine(AddressSpace); break; }
LLVM,NVPTX,156,"As an error message, the code snippet will end by saying: ""Unknown address space: <AddressSpace>."""
LLVM,NVPTX,157,"The next statement in this code snippet could be a default case for the switch statement, or it could be the end of the function with a closing curly brace."
LLVM,NVPTX,158,OutStreamer -> emitRawText ( OS1 . str ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,159,"}
The next statement will check if the value of RC is equal to & and if it is, it will set Ret equal to the value of ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> )."
LLVM,NVPTX,160,The next statement might be: return Ret;
LLVM,NVPTX,161,"}

I am unable to predict the next statement as it depends on the specific context and purpose of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,162,"""Raw string vector successfully formatted with depot name and function number."""
LLVM,NVPTX,163,"return <STR_LIT> ; case Type :: DoubleTyID : return <STR_LIT> ;}

return <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,164,"return ""<STR_LIT ;

There is likely an error with the closing quotes and semicolon in the last case statement, it should probably be: ""STR_LIT"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,165,"The code snippet will likely continue with performing some actions or operations on the ConstantArray object referred to by the variable ""InitList"", such as accessing its elements or using it in other calculations or comparisons."
LLVM,NVPTX,166,"const DataLayout & DL = GV -> getContext <

 LLVMContextAssuming there is more code after this statement, the prediction for the next statement would be to declare a variable of type ""uint64t"" and assign it the value of ""DL.getTypeAllocSize(GV->getType()->getElementType())"". However, since the statement given is incomplete, there may be other possible statements that could follow."
LLVM,NVPTX,167,if (LI.isLoopHeader(PMBB)) continue;
LLVM,NVPTX,168,RegisterAsmParser < <ISA_LIT>AsmParser > Y ( getThe<ISA_LIT>Target32 ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,169,The variable "SymNamePtr" will contain the string value from the function call nvTM.getManagedStrPool() -> getManagedString(Sym).
LLVM,NVPTX,170,"SymNamePtr = nvTM . getManagedStrPool ( ) -> getManagedString ( NextSym ) ;

NextSymNamePtr = nvTM . getManagedStrPool ( ) -> getManagedString ( NextNextSym ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,171,"No prediction possible, as the code snippet is incomplete and lacks context."
LLVM,NVPTX,172,"This for loop iterates through all operands of the current machine instruction and checks if the subtarget has image handles. If it does, it lower the operand to a MCOperand and adds it to OutMI. Otherwise, it calls lowerOperand to lower the operand and adds it to OutMI."
LLVM,NVPTX,173,"</s>

The output statement will be ""return false""."
LLVM,NVPTX,174,O << ']' ;
LLVM,NVPTX,175,"} 

It is likely that the next statement will either be a return statement or a statement within the 'r' case."
LLVM,NVPTX,176,"llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ; APInt API = APF . bitcastToAPInt ( ) ; O << lead << format_hex_no_prefix ( API . getZExtValue ( ) , numHex , true ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,177,"if ( Modifier && strcmp( Modifier , ""imm"") == 0 ) { O << """"; printOperand ( MI , opNum + 1 , O ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,178,>> return this shouldn't print anything
LLVM,NVPTX,179,"""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>); } break;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,180,"const Conditional

{
The next statement would likely involve printing the conditional return value of the function in assembly code."
LLVM,NVPTX,181,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context of the code snippet. The next statement could be any valid expression or code block that is part of the function MF . getFunction().
LLVM,NVPTX,182,"}Predict the next statement:
<STR_LIT> ; } else { viewGlobalValueSymbol ( * v , LOL , MCM , LOLO , Cexpr , PAR , O , MAI ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,183,return Result;
LLVM,NVPTX,184,"if (Result) {
  // Code to be executed if AsmPrinter successfully ran on machine function F
}
else {
  // Code to be executed if AsmPrinter failed to run on machine function F
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,185,"O << <STR_LIT> ; } }</s>
O << ""return Physr"""
LLVM,NVPTX,186,"if ( ! isIntrinsicFunc )

The code will check if the given constant is a valid use function and return true if it is not an intrinsic function."
LLVM,NVPTX,187,"VisitGlobalVariableForEmission( GV, Order, Visited, Visiting );"
LLVM,NVPTX,188,<s> assert ( ( curpos + Num ) <= size ) ; assert ( ( curpos + Bytes ) <= size ) ; for (int i = <NUM_LIT> ; i < Num ; ++ i ) { buffer [ curpos ] = Ptr [ i ] ; curpos ++ ; } for ( int i = Num ; i < Bytes ; ++ i ) { buffer [ curpos ] = <NUM_LIT> ; curpos ++ ; } return curpos ;
LLVM,NVPTX,189,"The next statement will be to close the for loop, possibly with a '{' bracket."
LLVM,NVPTX,190,"""Symbols and GVar are added to the Symbols vector, increasing the value of numSymbols."""
LLVM,NVPTX,191,"</s>

<s>return Symbols;</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,192,"</s>

}
cout << ""The current position plus 'Num' is less than or equal to 'size'. Continuing with the 'for' loop."" << endl;"
LLVM,NVPTX,193,"</s>

Please provide more context, as the code snippet is incomplete and does not give enough information to make a prediction."
LLVM,NVPTX,194,"None, this is the last statement of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,195,"</s>

<NUM_LIT> }"
LLVM,NVPTX,196,"return True

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,197,"The next statement could be an if statement checking if the ""seenMap"" dictionary contains the current function ""& F"". If it does, the code will call the ""emitDeclaration"" function and then break out of the loop. If it does not, the code will add the current function ""& F"" to the ""seenMap"" dictionary and continue with the loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,198,"</s>

This code snippet prints out a string literal while looping through a vector of global variables associated with a specific function."
LLVM,NVPTX,199,"GV -> printAsOperand(O,PrintType

; print.c:1373

"" ;

The next statement would be:


O << "" ; print.c:1373"" ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,200,"""Type, Align, Size"">
""printParamName (I, paramIndex, O); O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT>; continue; }"""
LLVM,NVPTX,201,"""O << <STR_LIT> ; if ( ETy -> isFloatingPointTy ( ) || ETy -> isIntOrPtrTy ( ) ) { O << <STR_LIT> ; O << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr ( ETy ) ; O << <STR_LIT> ; getSymbol ( GVar ) -> print ( O , MAI ) ; return ; } int64_t ElementSize = <NUM_LIT> ; switch ( ETy -> getTypeID ( ) ) { case Type :: StructTyID : case Type :: ArrayTyID : case Type :: FixedVectorTyID : Element"
LLVM,NVPTX,202,The next statement will be: O << * (unsigned int*)(buffer + nextSymbolPos);
LLVM,NVPTX,203,"} break ; 

unsigned int ElementSize = <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,204,"The next statement will likely be ""if (Order.empty()) { return false; }"", which would be used to check if the Order vector is empty before returning a false value. Alternatively, the next statement could be ""return true;"", which would be used to return a true value if the Order vector is not empty."
LLVM,NVPTX,205,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could depend on the purpose and function of the buffer and the code snippet as a whole.
LLVM,NVPTX,206,"next = buffer ;

next = nullptr;"
LLVM,NVPTX,207,llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,NVPTX,208,"The next statement could be either an assignment or an if statement, depending on the value of the expression ""! M.getModuleInlineAsm().empty()"". If the expression is true, then the statement could be ""OutStreamer->AddComment(<STR_LIT>)"", otherwise there will be no further statement in this code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,209,"emitDefinition ( F , O ) ; break ; } } continue ; }
The code will check if the next user of F is a constant, and if it is, it will check if the constant is used in a global variable definition. If it is, the code will call the emitDeclaration function with F and O as parameters. Otherwise, if the constant has already been seen, the code will call the emitDefinition function with F and O as parameters. If neither of these conditions are met, the loop will continue."
LLVM,NVPTX,210,"}

The code will continue to loop through the users of F, checking if each one is a constant and if it is used in a global variable definition. If it is, the declaration will be emitted and the loop will break. If not, the code will check if the user is a function that has been seen before, and if so, the declaration will be emitted and the loop will break. If the user is not a constant or a previously seen function, the code will continue to the next iteration."
LLVM,NVPTX,211,"emitPrototypeDirective ( F , O ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,212,"O << MF -> getFunctionNumber ( * F ) ;

O << MF -> getFunctionNumber ( * F ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,213,This function overrides the emitGlobalVariable function and takes in a constant GlobalVariable parameter called GV.
LLVM,NVPTX,214,"</s>

<s> // todo: implement this function
</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,215,The next statement would likely check if the file name is present in the filenameMap.
LLVM,NVPTX,216,"""The filenameMap will be searched for the current file name, and if found, the source will be emitted in the text, along with the current line and column numbers."""
LLVM,NVPTX,217,"O << <STR_LIT> </s>

default: O << <PTR_LIT> ;

break;"
LLVM,NVPTX,218,"} }

This code snippet is a function that takes in an address space parameter and a raw output stream and then uses a switch statement to determine which string literal to output based on the address space."
LLVM,NVPTX,219,<<" .align " << GVar->getAlignment();
LLVM,NVPTX,220,"The next statement will be an if-else statement checking if the reader's file name is equal to the given filename. If they are not equal, the reader will be deleted and a new LineReader object will be created with the new filename."
LLVM,NVPTX,221,"reader = new LineReader ( filename ) ; }

""The code will instantiate a new LineReader object and assign it to the variable 'reader' with the filename as a parameter."""
LLVM,NVPTX,222,"}

It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet would be a closing brace, as there are no more if statements or loops to continue the code execution."
LLVM,NVPTX,223,RegisterAsmPrinter < <ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter > Z ( getThe<ISA_LIT>Target128 ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,224,"The next statement is:
case Instruction::Sub: {
  const MCExpr *LHS = lowerConstantForGV(CE->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), ProcessingGeneric);
  const MCExpr *RHS = lowerConstantForGV(CE->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), ProcessingGeneric);
  switch (CE->getOpcode()) {
    default: llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);
    case Instruction::Sub: return MCBinaryExpr::createSub(LHS, RHS, Ctx);
  }
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,225,"Assuming the code snippet is incomplete and `MCOp` is a variable, the next statement could be something like `MCOp->doSomething();` where `doSomething()` is a function or method of the `MCOp` object."
LLVM,NVPTX,226,The next statement is the closing bracket for the lowerImageHandleSymbol function.
LLVM,NVPTX,227,"MCOp = MCOperand :: createExpr ( <ISA_LIT>DoubleMCExpr :: createConstantFP ( Val , OutContext ) ) ;


The code switches based on the type of the operand."
LLVM,NVPTX,228,The next statement will likely be a return statement that will return the string representation of the converted APFloat value.
LLVM,NVPTX,229,"O << <STR_LIT> ; getSymbol ( GVar ) -> print ( O , MAI ) ; O << <STR_LIT> ; O << ElementSize / <NUM_LIT> ; } O << <STR_LIT> ; } else { OutStreamer << <STR_LIT> ; } if ( ! typeIsPadding ( ETy ) ) OutStreamer << <STR_LIT> << DL . getTypeStoreSize ( ETy ) ; } } break ; 

The code snippet is creating a buffer to store data and then performing operations on it."
LLVM,NVPTX,230,"elemtype = vtparts [ i ] . getVectorElementType ( ) ; } O << <STR_LIT> << idx << <STR_LIT> ; }

llvm_unreachable(""<STR_LIT>"");"
LLVM,NVPTX,231,"EVT elemtype = vtparts [ i ] ; if ( elemtype . isVector ( ) ) //
if (i == e - 1 && elems > 1) {
  totalsz *= elems;
  O << <STR_LIT> << totalsz << <STR_LIT> << retAlignment << <STR_LIT>;
} else {
  llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,232,"OutStreamer -> EmitDwarfCompileUnitDirective ( i , <STR_LIT> , Dirname, Filename ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,233,"OutStreamer -> EmitDwarfFileDirective (i, <STR_LIT>, Filename);"
LLVM,NVPTX,234,"O << <STR_LIT> ; break ;

None of the cases in this code snippet match the specified conditions, so the program will proceed to the next line of code outside of this switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,235,O << <STR_LIT>; <s>
LLVM,NVPTX,236,"O << <COMMENT> '''a)

O << MI->getOperand(0).getReg() << "" is implicitly defined"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,237,}
LLVM,NVPTX,238,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,239,O << * MO . getMachineMemOperand () ;
LLVM,NVPTX,240,This code snippet is incomplete so the prediction cannot be accurately made.
LLVM,NVPTX,241,"<S> Symbols . push_back ( GVar ) ; <S> If it is a vector, the statement might involve accessing or modifying the element at a specific index."
LLVM,NVPTX,242,"This code snippet is defining a class called AggBuffer, which takes in three parameters: an unsigned integer called _size, a raw_ostream reference called _O, and an ISA_LITAsmPrinter reference called _AP. The class also initializes a variable called buffer to a newly allocated unsigned character array with a size of _size and sets the size variable to _size."
LLVM,NVPTX,243,7
LLVM,NVPTX,244,"}

""The bytes value is obtained from the struct layout by subtracting the offset of the current element from the offset of the next element."""
LLVM,NVPTX,245,"ptr = ( unsigned char * ) CPV ; aggBuffer -> addBytes ( ptr , s , Bytes ) ; }
llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> )"
LLVM,NVPTX,246,The next statement would return true.
LLVM,NVPTX,247,If (oneFunc == nullptr) { f = nullptr ; }
LLVM,NVPTX,248,"}
The emitFooter() function will be called to complete the module print.';"
LLVM,NVPTX,249,stats = MMI->getQueryResult ( M );
LLVM,NVPTX,250,"emitBody(F, O);"
LLVM,NVPTX,251,It seems like the code is going to output a string literal using the EmitRawText function from the OutStreamer object.
LLVM,NVPTX,252,<s>IL.EmitVoid(Opcode.ClearVRegMapping); </s>
LLVM,NVPTX,253,OutStreamer.Finish();
LLVM,NVPTX,254,"""Print out the contents of Str using the raw_svector_ostream O."""
LLVM,NVPTX,255,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,256,> Emit the function's entry label
LLVM,NVPTX,257,"case <NUM_LIT> : break ; case <NUM_LIT> : O << <STR_LIT> ; break ; } } }
if (isKernelFunc) 
{
  if (nvptxSubtarget.getSmVersion() >= <NUM_LIT>) 
  {
    O << <STR_LIT>;
  } 
  for (auto I = F->arg_begin(), E = F->arg_end(); I != E; ++I) 
  {
    Type *Ty = I->getType();
    if (!first) 
    {
      O << <STR_LIT>;
    }
    first ="
LLVM,NVPTX,258,assert (GVVisited.size() == M.getGlobalList().size() && "Expected number of visited global variables to match total number of global variables in the module.");
LLVM,NVPTX,259,"for (const GlobalVariable *GV : M.global_values()) {
  nextGVVisiting.insert(GV)"
LLVM,NVPTX,260,"The next statement could be:

if (nvptxSubtarget.getDefaultFeatures() == <STR_LIT>) O << <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,261,O << "Output to stream";
LLVM,NVPTX,262,"}</s>

The next statement would be: 

return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,263,"The next statement could be: 
MCInst Inst2; // create another MCInst object"
LLVM,NVPTX,264,OS << "mcInst Inst;"
LLVM,NVPTX,265,O << <STR_LIT> << maxntidx << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,266,"This code snippet checks the debug location and assigns it to the variable ""curLoc"". It then checks if the previous debug location and current debug location are both unknown and returns if they are. It then checks if the previous and current debug locations are equal and returns if they are. Otherwise, it updates the previous debug location to be the current debug location and checks if the current debug location is unknown. If it is, it returns. Then, it assigns the function's context to variable ""ctx"" and creates a DIScope object using the current debug location's scope. It asserts that the scope is either null or a valid scope."
LLVM,NVPTX,267,"else { if ( isa < GlobalAlias > ( V ) ) { const GlobalAlias * GA = cast < GlobalAlias > ( V ) ; if ( GA ) { O << <STR_LIT> ; } } else { O << <STR_LIT> ; } } } }
""The next statement is O << <STR_LIT>;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,268,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,269,"O << <STR_LIT> ;

O << getElementPointerTypeStr (ETy);"
LLVM,NVPTX,270,The next statement will be "break;" as it is the default case in a switch statement and will exit the case block.
LLVM,NVPTX,271,"What the ""temp"" variable is returned

The ""temp"" variable is returned as a string with a line of text added."
LLVM,NVPTX,272,"return i * alignStruct ;
return i * alignStruct * alignE ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,273,The next statement is likely to be a return statement with a null pointer value.
LLVM,NVPTX,274,The next statement will be: "return MCOperand :: Create (Expr);"
LLVM,NVPTX,275,There is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,276,The code will return true if either PI is not equal to the end of the TypeNameMap or if PI->second does not match any of the specified string literals.
LLVM,NVPTX,277,"</s>

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,278,The <ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter will be registered for the <ISA_LIT>Target64 architecture.
LLVM,NVPTX,279,"The next statement is a ""case"" statement, which is used to handle specific instructions. 
Switching on the opcode of the ConstantExpr CE, the statement will go to either the default case (where the lower constant function is called on the constant C), or the ""case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast"" statement (where the types are checked and an error may be reported)."
LLVM,NVPTX,280,"return true ; } return false ; }

The next statement will be another ""case"" statement followed by a block of code that includes an ""if"" statement with a ""return"" statement inside."
LLVM,NVPTX,281,"MCOp->addExpr(MCSymbolRefExpr::create(Sym, OutContext));"
LLVM,NVPTX,282,case MachineOperand :: MO_Register : MCOp = MCOperand :: CreateReg ( MO . getReg ( ) ) ; break ;
LLVM,NVPTX,283,"if ( Cexpr -> getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) { O << * <SRC_DATA> ; } else if ( reader -> doGlobalValueUse ( v ) ) { O << <STR_LIT> ; } else { O << <STR_LIT> ; } }

""O << ""pos += nBytes"" ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,284,"printGlobalAddress(MO.getGlobalAddress(), O);"
LLVM,NVPTX,285,"This code is likely part of a function that takes in arguments, and the next statement will likely be a loop that iterates through each argument (stored in variables I and E), incrementing the index variable i for each argument."
LLVM,NVPTX,286,The next statement could potentially be a for loop or an if statement that checks the values of variables i and e.
LLVM,NVPTX,287,"O << * getSymbol ( GVar ) ; return ; } else { O << * getSymbol ( GVar ) ; return ; } }

The code snippet will check if the constant is a ConstantExpr and strip any pointer casts. Then it will check if the resulting value is a GlobalValue and if it is, it will print the symbol and then return."
LLVM,NVPTX,288,"return ; }

{ Fail }"
LLVM,NVPTX,289,"sys :: path :: append ( FullPathName , Filename ) ; Filename = FullPathName . str ( ) ; } }>

The next statement would be to close the function (recordAndEmitFilenames) with ""}""."
LLVM,NVPTX,290,"if ( RC -> getSize ( ) < <NUM_LIT> ) { 

if (i < numVRs) {
    // do something 
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,291,"for ( unsigned int j = 0 ; j < n ; j++ ) {
  O << <STR_LIT> << ( int ) i << <STR_LIT> ;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,292,"}

There may be additional statements after the second if statement, depending on the code structure."
LLVM,NVPTX,293,"The next statement will be ""if (const BasicBlock *BB = dyn_cast<BasicBlock>(U)) { return usedInOneFunc(BB, oneFunc); }""."
LLVM,NVPTX,294,"curFunc

} else { return true; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,295,Order.push_back(GV);
LLVM,NVPTX,296,The code will continue to execute after the for loop.
LLVM,NVPTX,297,"}
There is no subsequent statement as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,298,"The next statement would be:
 
O << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,299,O << <STR_LIT> << GVar -> getName ( ) << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,300,"break

The next statement will be:

O << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,301,"</s>

O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,302,"The next statement is:
""i++;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,303,"The next statement is performing a for loop, where the counter variable ""i"" is initialized to <NUM_LIT> and will loop until it reaches ""n"" while inserting each element from the gv_array into the end of the global_list."
LLVM,NVPTX,304,"""The PTXVersion is divided by a numerical value and the result is concatenated with other string literals and then printed out."""
LLVM,NVPTX,305,return Result;
LLVM,NVPTX,306,The next statement would be an opening curly brace ({) to begin the code block for the "else" statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,307,">

emitSymbol(GVar, O, TD, ETy, ElementSize);"
LLVM,NVPTX,308,"alignStruct = std :: max ( alignStruct , getOpenCLAlignment ( TD , ETy ) ) ; } return alignStruct ; } 

The next statement will likely be a return statement that returns the value of the variable ""alignStruct"", calculated using the ""std::max"" function and the ""getOpenCLAlignment"" function, after looping through the elements in the StructType ""STy""."
LLVM,NVPTX,309,"} return false ; } </s>
return true"
LLVM,NVPTX,310,"valer = SDValue ( }

if (idx < vtparts.size()) { idx++; bool valer = """"; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,311,"if ( elemtype . isSimple ( ) ) { O << <STR_LIT> << elems << <STR_LIT> << elemtype . getScalarType ( ) << <STR_LIT> ; }
""end of switch statement"""
LLVM,NVPTX,312,"return ; }

if (const Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(CPV)) {
  if (EmitGeneric) {
    O << <STR_LIT>;
  }
  O << *getSymbol(I);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,313,1
LLVM,NVPTX,314,"The next statement is a for loop:
for (const User *UU : U->users())"
LLVM,NVPTX,315,"return true ;

The next statement is likely going to return a boolean value of either true or false."
LLVM,NVPTX,316,O << getSymbolName ( F ) <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,317,The next statement will be "if ( Ty -> isAggregateType ( ) || Ty -> isVectorTy ( ) ) {"
LLVM,NVPTX,318,"</s>

Print the parameter name for index 'I' with the given output stream 'O' and continue."
LLVM,NVPTX,319,The next statement is "O << getSymbolName ( GVar ) << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,320,"The code will print the symbol name of the global variable, along with its element size if applicable, followed by a closing string literal and then break out of the switch statement. If the type is not a struct, array, or vector, it will assert and return."
LLVM,NVPTX,321,"}
CleanNameStream << C;"
LLVM,NVPTX,322,"} else if ( C == '<STR_LIT> ) { CleanNameStream << <STR_LIT> ; }

 ""CleanNameStream << OriginalName[I];"""
LLVM,NVPTX,323,">

This snippet of code is part of a switch statement, so it is impossible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the cases."
LLVM,NVPTX,324,"The next statement will likely be a ""break"" statement, as the above code snippet contains a ""switch"" statement which will break after executing one of the cases."
LLVM,NVPTX,325,"Since there are no more cases after this code snippet, the prediction would be that the code will continue executing outside of the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,326,"</s>

} else { 
	// Handle unknown operand 
}

// The next statement will handle any unknown operand."
LLVM,NVPTX,327,"return ;

The next statement is: O << getSymbolName ( MO . getGlobal ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,328,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,329,The next statement could be: "else { O << <UNKNOWN> ; return ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,330,"The code will check if the function pointer ""oneFunc"" is used in the function ""usedInOneFunc"" and if it is not, it will return false. Then, it will check if ""oneFunc"" is still equal to nullptr. If it is, the code will return false. Otherwise, it will set the variable ""f"" equal to the function pointer ""oneFunc"" and return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,331,"The next statement will likely be another call to the OutStreamer object, possibly to emit more text or add comments."
LLVM,NVPTX,332,"""OutStreamer.EmitRawText(M.getModuleInlineAsm());"""
LLVM,NVPTX,333,O << "-- paramIndex ; continue ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,334,"The next statement is:
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isReservedReg -1) { }"
LLVM,NVPTX,335,We will use the raw_svector_ostream object to write the contents of the SmallString object to the output stream OS.
LLVM,NVPTX,336,"</s>

OutStreamer . EmitRawText ( temp . str ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,337,"temp << <INT_LIT> ;

(This code snippet appends an integer literal to the string 'temp'.)"
LLVM,NVPTX,338,"</s>

This code snippet appends a string literal and the next line from a reader to a temporary variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,339,"""} llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,340,The code will loop through each operand of MI and convert it using the lowerOperand function.
LLVM,NVPTX,341,"} }

const MachineOperand & MO = MI -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT> ) ; MCOperand MCOp ; if ( ! nvptxSubtarget -> hasImageHandles ( ) ) { if ( lowerImageHandleOperand ( MI , <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT> , MCOp ) ) { OutMI . addOperand ( MCOp ) ; continue ; } }"
LLVM,NVPTX,342,"if ( GVar -> hasInitializer ( ) ) { O << <STR_LIT> ; } else { O << <STR_LIT> << ElementSize / <NUM_LIT> << <STR_LIT> ; } } } else { O << <STR_LIT> << ElementSize << //std::string Vectorize aggregation // if (numElements > <NUM_LIT>) { // for (unsigned int i = <NUM_LIT>; i < numElements; ++i) { // if (isVectorized) { // O << };


BufferAggregateConstant ( The next statement will likely call the ""bufferAggregate"
LLVM,NVPTX,343,The next statement is "}"
LLVM,NVPTX,344,"""}""

Explanation: The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace (}). This would signify the end of the printParamName function."
LLVM,NVPTX,345,"if ( vtparts [ i ] . isVector ( ) ) { idx = i ; break ; } }


""if (vtparts[idx].isVector())"""
LLVM,NVPTX,346,This snippet predicts the next statement to be O << " ]" ;
LLVM,NVPTX,347,"Check if the current file name is already in the filenameMap and if so, continue to the next iteration of the loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,348,while (i < 10) { i++; }
LLVM,NVPTX,349,"}

{
			int numRegClasses = TRI -> getNumRegClasses();	
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,350,"<eos>

The next statement could possibly be an ""if"" statement with conditions involving the constant C."
LLVM,NVPTX,351,"} }
""}"""
LLVM,NVPTX,352,"Ret = ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) ; } return Ret ; }

// Increase the value of Ret by 1 and return it"
LLVM,NVPTX,353,"<NUM_LIT> ; } }O << <STR_LIT>;</s>

The next statement is ""}"" to close the ""for"" loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,354,"buffer_size = _size ; }</s>

The next statement is probably going to be initializing the AggBuffer class and setting the variables O and AP to the values passed in as parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,355,"global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);"
LLVM,NVPTX,356,"The next statement will likely be the closing bracket for the for loop, followed by a semicolon."
LLVM,NVPTX,357,The next statement would be to end the if statement with a closing curly brace.
LLVM,NVPTX,358,"</s>


The closing curly brace symbol, followed by a semicolon."
LLVM,NVPTX,359,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,360,std::cout << O.str();
LLVM,NVPTX,361,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,362,The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace that ends the "else" statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,363,"</s>

No more statements."
LLVM,NVPTX,364,"}

The next statement predicts that the program will add a comment to the OutStreamer regarding the register specified by RegNo."
LLVM,NVPTX,365,"Depending on the value of RegNo, either the AddComment method of OutStreamer will add a string containing the virtual register name or the name of the register for the current <ISA_LIT> subtarget."
LLVM,NVPTX,366,"}

return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,367,"break;

The code will output a string, get the element size, and then print the current global variable to the specified output stream using the provided data layout and module assembler information."
LLVM,NVPTX,368,"getSymbol(GVar)->print(O, MAI); O << <STR_LIT>; if (ElementSize) { O << ElementSize; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,369,"Ret = ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT>)
<small>[end]</small>

None of the if statements evaluate to true, so the code will end."
LLVM,NVPTX,370,Instruction::Add is the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,371,"APInt API = cast < ConstantInt > ( CE -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) -> getValue ( ) ; return getSymbolPre32 ( API . getZExtValue ( ) , MVT :: iPTR , AsmPrinter :: DS_None ) ; }


std :: string S ; raw_string_ostream OS ( S ) ; OS << <STR_LIT> ; CE -> printAsOperand ( OS , false , ! MF ? nullptr : MF -> getFunction ( ) . getParent ( ) ) ; report_fatal_error ( OS . str ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,372,"} }

O << * Name ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,373,"} else {
'size' as it will continue the loop starting at num_lit and increase it by one each time."
LLVM,NVPTX,374,"Result variable will have a boolean value indicating whether the AsmPrinter function ran successfully or not, and the EmitRawText function in the next line will output the given string literal to the OutStreamer."
LLVM,NVPTX,375,"if ( ! Result ) {

if (Result) {

The statement inside the if statement will not execute."
LLVM,NVPTX,376,"X = U -> getOperand ( i ) ; } } </s>

""X will be assigned a value using the 'getOperand' method on the User variable 'U'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,377,"emitGlobalVariables(M, OS2, Globals, GVVisited, GVVisiting);"
LLVM,NVPTX,378,"O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; } }


}

O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; printParamName (I, paramIndex, O) ; continue ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,379,The next statement will output " ; if ( MAI -> doesSupportDebugInformation ( ) ) O << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT> ; if ( nvptxSubtarget . is64Bit ( ) ) O << <STR_LIT> ; else O << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,380,else O << <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,381,"If ( FTy ) {
  return TD -> getPointerPrefAlignment ( ) ;
} else {
  return TD -> getPrefTypeAlignment ( Ty ) ;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,382,"case Instruction :: SRem : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateRem ( LHS , RHS , Ctx ) ; case Instruction :: Shl : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateShl ( LHS , RHS , <NUM_LIT> , Ctx )

No prediction can be made as the code snippet is incomplete and does not have a clear pattern or context. Additionally, the next statement could depend on the values of the variables and constants used in the previous statements, which are not provided in the snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,383,else O << "load.param."
LLVM,NVPTX,384,Visit all dependent global variables for emission.
LLVM,NVPTX,385,"}

Error message:
Undefined variable ""MF""."
LLVM,NVPTX,386,OutStreamer->EmitRawText("Emitting Function Virtual Registers");
LLVM,NVPTX,387,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement as the code snippet alone does not provide enough context.
LLVM,NVPTX,388,"""O << <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,389,"The next statement could potentially be another for loop or a conditional statement, depending on the specific contents of the ""gvars"" variable. It is difficult to make an accurate prediction without more context."
LLVM,NVPTX,390,<TM> is being casted to a constant reference of <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine type and assigned to the constant reference <NTM>.
LLVM,NVPTX,391,"emitDefinitions(M, Globals, GVVisited, GVVisiting);"
LLVM,NVPTX,392,"} 

The next statement could be ""O << <STR_LIT> << (unsigned int)GVar->getRawAlignment()"" to print the alignment of the GVar variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,393,"} 

""O << getSymbol(GVar)->print(O, MAI);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,394,"}

""The function returns the symbol created by the OutContext using the string 'Str'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,395,"The next statement is ""for ( i = <NUM_LIT> ; i < n ; i ++ ) global_list . insert ( global_list . end ( ) , gv_array [ i ] ) ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,396,"The next statement could be another line of code or a closing bracket, as the code is incomplete."
LLVM,NVPTX,397,"else {
  OutStreamer -> EmitRawText ( StringRef ( <STR_LIT> ) ) ;
}

OutStreamer -> EmitRawText ( StringRef ( <STR_LIT> ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,398,"If the function F is not a declaration, the emitDeclaration function will be executed, passing in the function F and the variable O."
LLVM,NVPTX,399,"If none of the previous if statements are met, the code will reach this statement: if (F->getName() != caller) { break; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,400,"Next, the code will emit additional raw text and clear the virtual register mapping before emitting a string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,401,"The next statement will likely involve printing some information related to the function being analyzed, possibly the function name or some function parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,402,unsigned sz = elemtype.getSizeInBits();
LLVM,NVPTX,403,"if ( Register :: isOpenVReg ( i ) ) { unsigned int vr = Register :: index2VirtReg ( i ) ; unsigned int physReg = MRI -> getVirtAuxReg ( vr , LM ) ; if ( ! physReg ) { physReg = <NUM_LIT> ; } O << <STR_LIT> << getRegisterName ( LM , physReg ) << <STR_LIT> ; if ( Register :: <NUM_LIT> == <NUM_LIT> ) { 

O << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,404,"The next statement will be: const std::string pairwiseNames[] = { rcname, rcname, rcname };"
LLVM,NVPTX,405,O << <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,406,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,407,"}</s>

""If the data type is not a vector, then the output will be the string representation of the register class followed by the mapped virtual register number."""
LLVM,NVPTX,408,"case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : </s>

The next statement is likely another case statement with a <STR_LIT> as the case value, as the pattern is repeated multiple times in the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,409,"} <S>

If PTy is not null, a check will be performed to determine if it is a pointer type with a non-generic address space."
LLVM,NVPTX,410,} else
LLVM,NVPTX,411,"It looks like the next statement will check if there is debug information and if so, call the closeLastSection method on TS. If there is no debug information, the emitRawText method will be called on OutStreamer."
LLVM,NVPTX,412,"O << <STR_LIT> << getOptimalAlignForParam ( Ty ) . value ( ) ; }



O << ""else { { O << "" << Ty->isIntegerTy(32) << ""; }"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,413,"""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);""."
LLVM,NVPTX,414,"}
The code snippet is missing an ending curly brace, so a compilation error will likely occur."
LLVM,NVPTX,415,"""In the else statement, the function ComputeValueVTs() will be called with four parameters: TLI, DL, Ty, and vtparts."""
LLVM,NVPTX,416,"* F -> arg_begin ( ) = ( ... )

llvm_unreachable(""Function already has a body"");"
LLVM,NVPTX,417,"}
The next statement is ""else { getSymbol ( GVar ) -> print ( O , MAI ) ; } return ; }""."
LLVM,NVPTX,418,"O << <STR_LIT> << <STR_LIT> ; }
O << <STR_LIT> << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr(ETy) << <STR_LIT> << *getSymbol(GVar) << <STR_LIT> << itostr(ElementSize) << <STR_LIT> << <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,419,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,420,"formatValueTypes ( O , vtparts , i , j , false ) ; continue ; }}

if (is64Bit)
{
    Data64Bit = Ty;
    count++;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,421,"If <NUM_LIT> is not defined or initialized, the code may raise an error."
LLVM,NVPTX,422,"The next statement is return lowerConstantForGV(Op, ProcessingGeneric);"
LLVM,NVPTX,423,The code snippet is likely part of a function that handles different instruction types. The next statement will likely be in the same format as the previous cases and will handle another instruction type. It is not possible to predict the exact instruction type or statement without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,424,The next statement is "AsmPrinter::doFinalization(M);"
LLVM,NVPTX,425,"The next statement is: 
ParseFile(fileName);"
LLVM,NVPTX,426,"]

The next statement would print the value at the next symbol position in the buffer."
LLVM,NVPTX,427,"i++;
OutStreamer.EmitDwarfFileDirective(i, <STR_LIT>, Filename);"
LLVM,NVPTX,428,"The next statement is: if ( ! Dirname . empty ( ) && ! sys :: path :: is_absolute ( Filename ) ) { sys :: path :: append ( FullPathName , Filename ) ; Filename = FullPathName ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,429,"> const PointerType * PTy = dyn_cast<Ty>

if (isABI || isKernelFunc) {
    unsigned align = PAL.getParamAlignment(paramIndex + sz);
    if (align == 0)
        O << ""align "" << sz << "" "";
    else
        O << ""align "" << align << "" "";
    printParamName(I, paramIndex, O);
    O << ""propagate "" << sz << "" "";
    continue;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,430,"Op = ConstantExpr :: getIntegerCast ( Op , TD . getIntPtrType ( CV -> getContext ( ) ) , false ) ; return LowerConstant ( Op , AP ) ; }
The next statement will be a case for the Instruction::IntToPtr operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,431,"}

O << <STR_LIT> ; // The next statement will most likely be another print statement, possibly printing out some information about the current parameter being processed."
LLVM,NVPTX,432,"</s>

O << <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,433,"ConvertDoubleToBytes ( ptr , float64 ) ; aggBuffer -> addBytes ( ptr , <NUM_LIT> , Bytes ) ; }

This code snippet continues the previous snippet by adding a case statement for the cases of type float and double. Depending on the type of constant floating-point value (float or double), the code converts the value to bytes and adds them to the aggregation buffer."
LLVM,NVPTX,434,"The code will check if the TargetMachine's operating system is not NVCL, and if that is the case, it will call the function ""recordAndEmitFilenames"" with the parameter M. After that, the variable ""GlobalsEmitted"" will be set to false, and the code will return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,435,Record and emit filenames from module M if the nvptxSubtarget driver interface is equal to <STR_LIT>. Set the boolean GlobalsEmitted to false.
LLVM,NVPTX,436,"The code snippet suggests that the next statement may involve adding a comment and a blank line to the OutStreamer, followed by emitting the module inline assembly code with another blank line and comment."
LLVM,NVPTX,437,"<BR>

cout << ""Element size is "" << ElementSize << endl;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,438,"case Instruction :: Or : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateOr ( LHS , RHS , Ctx ) ; case Instruction :: Xor : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateXor ( LHS , RHS , Ctx ) ;

The next statement would be ""default: llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);"" which is located at line 290. This statement is part of a switch statement that handles various instructions and their corresponding MC binary expressions."
LLVM,NVPTX,439,"sscanf ( symbname + <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , & index ) ; if ( index == <NUM_LIT> )break ; O << DEPOTNAME <<

getFunctionNumber() << <STR_LIT> << index ; } else { O << symbname ; } }"
LLVM,NVPTX,440,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,441,SmallString <<NUM_LIT> > Str1;
LLVM,NVPTX,442,"></s>
 if ( Ty -> isIntegerTy ( 32 ) )"
LLVM,NVPTX,443,"}

O << <STR_LIT> ; break;"
LLVM,NVPTX,444,The next statement would be: "llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;".
LLVM,NVPTX,445,The code will print the string "llvm_unreachable (" followed by the string "Unable to determine element size") and will then return.
LLVM,NVPTX,446,"case Instruction::Sub: {
  const MCExpr *LHS = lowerConstantForGV(CE->getOperand(0), ProcessingGeneric);
  const MCExpr *RHS = lowerConstantForGV(CE->getOperand(1), ProcessingGeneric);
  switch (CE->getOpcode()) {
    default:
      llvm_unreachable(""Invalid opcode!"");
    case Instruction::Sub:
      return MCBinaryExpr::createSub(LHS, RHS, Ctx);
  }
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,447,"return lowerConstantForGV ( Op , Pro'some instruction'
Instruction: GetElementPtr"
LLVM,NVPTX,448,"</s>

""assert(Ty->isFloatingPointTy() && <STR_LIT>size = Ty->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();"""
LLVM,NVPTX,449,"++ idx ; Predict the next statement of this code snippet:
 <NUM_LIT> O << <STR_LIT> << idx ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,450,"""Ret is equal to the result of calling doFinalization on M, and the for loop will then insert elements from gv_array into global_list."""
LLVM,NVPTX,451,"for (i = <NUM_LIT>; i < n; i++) {
    global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,452,print "The number of virtual registers is " << numVRs << <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,453,The next statement will be a break statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,454,OutStreamer->InitToModule(M);
LLVM,NVPTX,455,O << "Function definitions for " << F->getName() << ":\n" ;
LLVM,NVPTX,456,"emitPTXAttributeType ( ETy , O ) ;}
 O << <STR_LIT> << "" "" << GVar->getName() << "";\n"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,457,O << <STR_LIT> << ElementSize ;
LLVM,NVPTX,458,The next statement could be another control flow statement or a returning statement. It could also be a call to a function or a declaration of a variable.
LLVM,NVPTX,459,Record filenames in the module and print all global variables to the output stream before returning false.
LLVM,NVPTX,460,"emitImplementations (M, OS2);"
LLVM,NVPTX,461,"if (PAL.paramHasAttr(paramIndex + 1, Attribute::ByVal) == true) {
  const PointerType *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(Ty);
  if (isKernelFunc) {
    if (PTy) {
      O << <STR_LIT> << thePointerTy.getSizeInBits() << <STR_LIT> ;
      if (nvptxSubtarget.getDrvInterface() != <STR_LIT>) {
        Type *ETy = PTy->getElementType();
        int addrSpace = PTy->getAddressSpace();
        switch (addrSpace) {
          default:"
LLVM,NVPTX,462,"if (PAL.paramHasAttr(paramIndex + 1, Attribute::ByVal) == false) { 
    const PointerType *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(Ty); 
    if (isKernelFunc){ 
        if(PTy){ 
            O << <STR_LIT> << getOpenCLAddressSpace(PTy->getAddressSpace())
<< <STR_LIT> << getOpenCLAlignment(TD, PTy->getElementType())
<< <STR_LIT> << thePointerTy.getSizeInBits() << <STR_LIT> ; 
        }
    }
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,463,This code snippet does not have any further statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,464,"Returns the alignment for the element type of the input vector type, multiplied by the number of elements if the number of elements is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, otherwise it returns <NUM_LIT> multiplied by the element alignment."
LLVM,NVPTX,465,"elemtype = vtparts [ i ] . getVectorElementType ( ) ; }

The next statement could be a for loop that calculates the total size of the elements in the vector and adds it to the current total size."
LLVM,NVPTX,466,"SmallVector <EVT, 1> vtparts;
ComputeValueVTs(*TLI, Ty, vtparts);
unsigned idx = 0;
for (unsigned i = 1, e = vtparts.size(); i != e; ++i) {
  unsigned elems = 0;"
LLVM,NVPTX,467,">
llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)"
LLVM,NVPTX,468,"else if ( Ty -> isFloatingPointTy ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) O << <STR_LIT> ; else std :: cerr << <STR_LIT> ; continue ; }

if (isKernelFunc) {
   if (PTy) {
      O << <STR_LIT> << thePointerTy.getSizeInBits() << <STR_LIT>;
      if (static_cast<<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine&>(TM).getDrvInterface() != <STR_LIT>) {
         Type *ETy = PTy->getElementType();
         int addrSpace = PTy->getAddressSpace();"
LLVM,NVPTX,469,"""TD->getTypeStoreSize(ETy) will be assigned to ElementSize, and then O will print the result of calling getSymbol(GVar) with MAI as the parameter, followed by printing <STR_LIT>."""
LLVM,NVPTX,470,"const MCExpr * RHS = lowerConstantForGV ( CE -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , ProcessingGeneric )

case Instruction :: Sub:  The next statement will likely be another ""case"" statement, since the code snippet is using a switch statement to handle different types of instructions."
LLVM,NVPTX,471,"}
O << <STR_LIT> 32 <STR_LIT> 1;"
LLVM,NVPTX,472,"APInt PtrBits ( 

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the value of the variables used in the code, such as ""CV,"" ""MF,"" ""getDataLayout(),"" and ""Ctx."""
LLVM,NVPTX,473,"In the case of an instruction being a truncation or bitcast, the function ""lowerConstantForGV"" will be called using the second operand as the argument."
LLVM,NVPTX,474,print param name or print function symbol
LLVM,NVPTX,475,The next statement will be O << symbname.
LLVM,NVPTX,476,return Bytes;
LLVM,NVPTX,477,"The next statement could be:
<NUM_LIT> + 1"
LLVM,NVPTX,478,The next statement is likely to be a closing bracket or a statement outside the function body.
LLVM,NVPTX,479,OutStreamer . AddComment ( StringRef ( M . getInlineAsm ( ) ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,480,"} 

if ( PAL . hasAttribute ( paramIndex + <NUM_LIT> , Attribute :: ByVal ) == false ) { if ( Ty -> isAggregateType ( ) || Ty -> isVectorTy ( ) || isa < IntegerType > ( Ty ) ) { unsigned align = PAL . getParamAlignment ( paramIndex + <NUM_LIT> ) ; O << <STR_LIT> << align << <STR_LIT> ; printParamName ( I , paramIndex , O ) ; O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; continue ; } const PointerType * PTy = dyn"
LLVM,NVPTX,481,<STR_LIT> << GVar -> getName ( ) << <STR_LIT> << O << <STR_LIT> << ( int ) TD -> getTypeAllocSize ( ETy ) << <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,482,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,483,The next statement is "if (i < e - <NUM_LIT>) O << <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,484,"O project assign

O << ""The size of the array is "" << sz;"
LLVM,NVPTX,485,"""O << <STR_LIT> << getSymbol(GVar) << ' ' << <STR_LIT>"" << ElementSize << ' ' << <STR_LIT>"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,486,"</s>

 ""Else, print out the defined address space of the PointerType followed by the pointer alignment according to the DataLayout"""
LLVM,NVPTX,487,"llvm_unreachable ( ) ; case Instruction :: <NUM_LIT> : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateSub ( LHS , RHS , Ctx ) ;

case Instruction :: ICmp : return MCBinaryExpr :: CreateICmp ( CE -> getPredicate ( ) , LHS , RHS , Ctx ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,488,"The next statement would most likely be a closing brace, marking the end of the function or code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,489,"return false ;

The program will return a boolean value of false."
LLVM,NVPTX,490,case <STR_LIT> :
LLVM,NVPTX,491,It is expected that the function will return the value of curpos at the end of the loop.
LLVM,NVPTX,492,totalTokens = numSymbols + numGVariables;
LLVM,NVPTX,493,"}

The next statement will be a closing curly brace (})."
LLVM,NVPTX,494,"bufferLEByte ( cast < Constant > ( CPV -> getValueInit ( i ) ) , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> <NUM_LIT> ;

Next, the code will check if the ConstantStruct has any operands and if so, it will call the bufferLEByte function with the i-th element of the struct."
LLVM,NVPTX,495,if (oneFunc = nullptr) return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,496,"}</s>


The code will likely continue by closing the for loop with a curly bracket and a semicolon."
LLVM,NVPTX,497,"</s>

i is compared to sizeof ( int64_t ) to determine if the loop should continue or not"
LLVM,NVPTX,498,vp[i] = 0;
LLVM,NVPTX,499,p [ i ] = ( unsigned char ) vp ;
LLVM,NVPTX,500,"if (vp < 0) {
  p[i] = (unsigned char)(vp * -1);
  vp = 0;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,501,"Result<NUM_LIT> . insert ( U -> getOperand ( i ) ) ; } }

if (const Value *V = GV->getInitializer()) Globals.insert(V);"
LLVM,NVPTX,502,"for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
     delete gv_array[i];
 }
 return ret;"
LLVM,NVPTX,503,"Next, there will be a conditional statement checking if the module's inline assembly is empty. If it is not empty, the next lines will add comments and emit the module's inline assembly to the output streamer."
LLVM,NVPTX,504,"The code will add a blank line and then emit the raw text of the module's inline assembly, followed by another blank line and a new comment."
LLVM,NVPTX,505,The next statement is most likely a conditional statement checking if GV is equal to nullptr.
LLVM,NVPTX,506,"//TODO}

The next statement could potentially be a function call or a comment indicating that the function still needs to be implemented. It could also be a return statement if the function is supposed to return a value."
LLVM,NVPTX,507,"</ISA_LIT>

The next statement is the closing curly brace for the EmitBasicBlockStart function."
LLVM,NVPTX,508,"emitFunctionBody ( F , O ) ;

emitFunctionClose ( F , O ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,509,"emitDeclaration(F, O);"
LLVM,NVPTX,510,if ( !BasicBlock || is
LLVM,NVPTX,511,"o

The next statement is ""Print the string literal and call the function printModuleLevelGV() using the current global variable and the raw_ostream reference, with the boolean value set to true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,512,"raw_svector_ostream OS ( Str ) ;


""OutStreamer will emit the function's virtual registers using the function pointer *MF and a small string of numbers."""
LLVM,NVPTX,513,The next statement would be: "return 0;".
LLVM,NVPTX,514,"</s>

There is not enough context to confidently predict the next statement. It could depend on the specific use case and what information the code snippet is trying to access or manipulate."
LLVM,NVPTX,515,"</s>


The next statement will likely involve a return statement or calling another function. It may also declare a variable or perform some kind of error handling."
LLVM,NVPTX,516,"The next statement is most likely going to be a conditional statement, such as an if statement, that checks for the value of ""specified"" and performs a certain action depending on its value. This could be followed by more conditional statements or a section of code that executes based on the value of ""specified."""
LLVM,NVPTX,517,"If the condition of the second ""if"" statement is true and the ""InterleaveSrc"" variable is true, the function ""emitSrcInText"" will be called with the parameters ""fileName"" and ""curLoc.getLine()""."
LLVM,NVPTX,518,"std :: string msg ; msg . append ( <STR_LIT> ) ; msg . append ( <STR_LIT> ) ;

""std::string msg ; msg . append ( <STR_LIT> ) ; msg . append ( <STR_LIT> ) ; if ( V -> hasName ( ) ) msg . append ( V -> getName ( ) ) ; msg . append ( <STR_LIT> ) ; llvm_unreachable ( msg . c_str ( ) ) ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,519,O << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,520,"</s>

""Break statement is executed."""
LLVM,NVPTX,521,"temp << reader -> readLine ( line ) ; temp << <STR_LIT> ; temp << line ; 
 temp << <STR_LIT> ; temp << reader -> readLine ( line ) ; temp << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,522,"}</s>

It is likely that the next statement will involve using the variable ""O"" to print the name of the virtual register identified by the unsigned integer ""vr""."
LLVM,NVPTX,523,"The next statement will likely be the end of the code, or it may be followed by an end statement to close the function or program."
LLVM,NVPTX,524,"The next statement could be the end of the function, a return statement, or a statement declaring a variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,525,"else return <STR_LIT>


The next statement would be ""else return <STR_LIT>"", following the pattern of the previous statements."
LLVM,NVPTX,526,The next statement is: return name + utostr(NumBits);
LLVM,NVPTX,527,"The next statement would be an if statement that checks whether the reader's filename is equal to filename, and if not, it will delete the current reader and create a new one with the given filename."
LLVM,NVPTX,528,"The next statement will be:
else {
    // Do something else }
This is because the if statement checks whether the current file name of the reader is not equal to the desired file name, and if it is not, it will delete the current reader and create a new one with the desired file name. If the condition is not met (i.e. the file names are the same), the code will move on to the next statement after the closing curly bracket of the if statement. Because there is no other code after the if statement, the next statement would be the ""else"" statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,529,return Expr;
LLVM,NVPTX,530,"return MCOperand::CreateExpr(MCSymbolRefExpr::Create(Symbol, MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None, *Ctx));"
LLVM,NVPTX,531,MappedVR is equal to the corresponding value in the DenseMap.
LLVM,NVPTX,532,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough context for the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,533,"</s>
AsmPrinter::isImageType() will return true if the type of the input parameter is an image type."
LLVM,NVPTX,534,"}
<s> std::cout << ""The next statement could potentially be a conditional statement or another loop."" ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,535,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,536,"</s>

fstr >> theNextLine;

The next statement would most likely be:

theNextLine = fstr.getline();"
LLVM,NVPTX,537,"<END>

open the file"
LLVM,NVPTX,538,The code snippet has no more statements and has reached the end of the function.
LLVM,NVPTX,539,"""case Instruction::PtrToInt: { return lowerConstantForGV(cast<const Constant>(CE->getOperand(0)), true); }"""
LLVM,NVPTX,540,"}>

The next statement is ""return false;""."
LLVM,NVPTX,541,std :: cout << *SymNamePtr << std::endl;
LLVM,NVPTX,542,"The next statement predicts:

 MCOp = GetSymbolRef(OutContext.getOrCreateSymbol(StringRef(SymNamePtr->c_str()))) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,543,This code snippet ends with a curly brace (}).
LLVM,NVPTX,544,The next statement is a closing curly brace.
LLVM,NVPTX,545,"if ( !nvptxSubtarget->hasSamplerHandles() ) {
	MCOp = MachineOperand(0);
	OutMI.addOperand(MCOp);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,546,"} ""If the address space of the pointer type is not <NUM_LIT>, print
the symbol name followed by the address space."""
LLVM,NVPTX,547,"</s>

O << ']';"
LLVM,NVPTX,548,"return ExtraCode[<NUM_LIT>];
} else {
return ""error"";
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,549,"</s>

The next statement will be an if statement, checking if the case is 'r'."
LLVM,NVPTX,550,O << lead << hexstr;
LLVM,NVPTX,551,"OS << "" + "" prediction: printMCExpr(*BE.getRHS(), OS);"
LLVM,NVPTX,552,The predicted statement is "}" to close the "if" statement and continue with the rest of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,553,"}

""return"""
LLVM,NVPTX,554,"} break; }</s>

O << ""Instruction printer will get the register name from "" + MachineOperand::MO_Register;"
LLVM,NVPTX,555,//I cannot predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,556,"</s>

The 'printBBHeader' function will be defined using the 'void' return type and will take in parameters 'const MachineBasicBlock *MBB' and 'raw_ostream &O'."
LLVM,NVPTX,557,"""The statement would be lowerConstant (CPV)->print(O, MAI);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,558,"}
The code will print the symbol of the global value, unless the value is a constant expression, in which case it will strip any pointer casts and print the symbol of the resultant value."
LLVM,NVPTX,559,")


O << 0x80 << vecelem [ Imm % <NUM_LIT> ] ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,560,"The code snippet will continue to check for multiple conditions using the ""else if"" statement and perform different actions based on the results. It is not possible to predict the specific statements without knowing the values of <STR_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>, Modifier, and Imm."
LLVM,NVPTX,561,"}

theCurLine will be increased by 1."
LLVM,NVPTX,562,"filenameMap [ Filename ] = i ; OutStreamer -> EmitDwarfFileDirective ( i , <STR_LIT> , Filename ) ; ++ i ; }

The code will iterate through all the subprograms in the module using a for loop and add a new filename to the filenameMap if it is not already present. Then, the OutStreamer will emit a DwarfFileDirective and increment the counter i."
LLVM,NVPTX,563,nvptxSubtarget.initializeSubtarget();
LLVM,NVPTX,564,"nvptxSubtarget->initC

Predicted statement: ""return nvptxSubtarget->initC;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,565,"The next statement of this code snippet is:

std::string rcname = get<ISA_LIT>RegClassName(RC);"
LLVM,NVPTX,566,"The code snippet will iterate through all virtual registers, assign them to a register class, and add them to a DenseMap with a corresponding index. This process will continue until the value of ""i"" is equal to the number of virtual registers, at which point the for loop will terminate."
LLVM,NVPTX,567,"As this code snippet is incomplete and does not follow any specific structure, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. Some possible next statements could be another closing curly bracket (}), a new statement inside the curly brackets, or an opening curly bracket ({) to start a new block of code."
LLVM,NVPTX,568,The code will check if the constant is used in a global variable definition and return a boolean value.
LLVM,NVPTX,569,"} }

There is no next statement, as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,570,"if (!caller->isDeclaration()) {                 // checks if the function is not a declaration
  errs() << caller->getName() << "" calls "";
} else {
  errs () << ""external function calls: "";
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,571,The next statement could be a closing curly brace that ends the current function.
LLVM,NVPTX,572,This code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,573,"</ISA_LIT>

<STACK> None"
LLVM,NVPTX,574,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be ""}""."
LLVM,NVPTX,575,The code will return the string that has been appended to the ValidNameStream object.
LLVM,NVPTX,576,The next statement will likely be the closing brace "}" to end the current method or class.
LLVM,NVPTX,577,"ValidNameStream << C ; } }

ValidNameStream << ValidName;"
LLVM,NVPTX,578,"}

The code will create a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>AssignValidGlobalNamesPass class and return it."
LLVM,NVPTX,579,<s> <END>
LLVM,NVPTX,580,"</s>

<s>} registerGlobalName ( Val_name )</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,581,"</s>

The next statement could be a function definition for the AssignValidGlobalNames function, which takes in no input parameters and returns an unspecified data type. Alternatively, it could be a list of statements within the AssignValidGlobalNames function."
LLVM,NVPTX,582,The next statement would be "}" to close the for loop for the function.
LLVM,NVPTX,583,return GV;
LLVM,NVPTX,584,// code for getting analysis usage will be implemented here }
LLVM,NVPTX,585,AU . setCheckingStateAtIO () ;
LLVM,NVPTX,586,"return ""InstructionCountPass"";

return ""InstructionCountPass"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,587,Syntax error - missing semicolon.
LLVM,NVPTX,588,"< /s>

This code snippet defines a ""FunctionPass"" named ""AtomicLower"" with ID set to ""ID."""
LLVM,NVPTX,589,"If the number of instructions in the BasicBlock is less than or equal to 1, return false. </s>

""If the number of instructions in the BasicBlock is greater than 1, continue with the function."""
LLVM,NVPTX,590,"</s>

""This code snippet creates a function for performing atomic operations on a given function and searches for all instructions in the function to find and store any local memory atomic operations."""
LLVM,NVPTX,591,The next statement is to return the boolean value 'true'.
LLVM,NVPTX,592,Closing curly brace.
LLVM,NVPTX,593,Cast->eraseFromParent();
LLVM,NVPTX,594,"if ( GlobalAlias * GA = dyn_cast < GlobalAlias > ( MI -> getOperand ( Idx ) ) ) {
			MI -> replaceAllUsesWith ( GA -> getAliasee () ) ;
			MI -> eraseFromParent () ;
			return true ;
		}"
LLVM,NVPTX,595,The next statement is "}"
LLVM,NVPTX,596,"Cast -> setOperand ( <NUM_LIT , NewGEPCE ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,597,"} } }

return Changed;"
LLVM,NVPTX,598,"</s>

There will be a conditional statement checking if the current instruction is a load instruction, and if it is, it will execute the code within the curly braces."
LLVM,NVPTX,599,"if ( Instruction * I = dyn_cast < Instruction > ( V ) ) {for ( Value * Op : I -> operands ()) {if ( isEliminableAddrSpaceCast ( Op )) {if ( Type * DestTy = getsucc ( I )-> getRawDestTyforSource ( cast < Instruction > ( Op ), AS )) {if ( Type * SrcTy = Op -> getType ()){return DestTy -> getPointerAddressSpace () == SrcTy -> getPointerAddressSpace () ;}}}}}"
LLVM,NVPTX,600,"if (AddrSpaceCastOperator *ASC = dyn_cast<AddrSpaceCastOperator>(V)) return hoistAddrSpaceCastFromAddrSpaceCast(ASC, Depth);"
LLVM,NVPTX,601,"}

The next statement is: 
BC->getType()->replaceAllUsesWith(NewBC);"
LLVM,NVPTX,602,"Value * NewBC = new AddrSpaceCastInst ( Src , TypeOfNewCast , <STR_LIT> , nullptr ) ; NewBC -> takeName ( BC ) ; BC -> replaceAllUsesWith ( NewBC ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,603,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,604,The next statement will be "GEP->replaceAllUsesWith(NewASC);"
LLVM,NVPTX,605,The next statement would be "return true;" to indicate that the operation was successfully completed.
LLVM,NVPTX,606,}
LLVM,NVPTX,607,return Changed;
LLVM,NVPTX,608,"if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
  return hoistAddrSpaceCastFromInst(I, Depth);"
LLVM,NVPTX,609,"NewBC = AddrSpaceCastInst ( Src , BC -> getType ( ) , <STR_LIT> , <ID> )

The next statement is ""NewBC->removeFromParent()""."
LLVM,NVPTX,610,"An instruction is created using the element type of the original operand, the first operand of the cast, and the original indices."
LLVM,NVPTX,611,The code will return the variable NewASC.
LLVM,NVPTX,612,DestTy->getElementType();
LLVM,NVPTX,613,return doFavorNonGenericAddrSpaces;
LLVM,NVPTX,614,"}

The next statement will likely be the ending curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,615,"}</s>

The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, as the function is finished and now needs to be closed."
LLVM,NVPTX,616,"}

return Changed;"
LLVM,NVPTX,617,"} } ;

This code snippet is attempting to optimize load instructions in a function. The next statement may involve checking if the optimization has been successful and updating the value of the ""Changed"" variable accordingly."
LLVM,NVPTX,618,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace, marking the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,619,"... }

The next statement will likely be a specific action or instruction to be performed within the ""emitEpilogue"" function. It is impossible to determine the exact statement without knowing the specific context and purpose of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,620,"</s>

 The next statement is most likely a closing bracket or curly brace, marking the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,621,"This snippet does not have any clear next statement, as it depends on the values of the variables used in the if statement. However, based on the information given, the next statement could potentially be another if statement or a return statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,622,"if ( NoFramePointerElim (MF) || Subtarget->isZeroBolr)
truestd

< s > const MachineFrameInfo & MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();"
LLVM,NVPTX,623,return;
LLVM,NVPTX,624,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,625,"if (MF.getFrameInfo().hasVarSizedObjects()) {
    // handle frame size calculations
}

MF.getFrameInfo().setHasVarSizedObjects(false); // set hasVarSizedObjects to false"
LLVM,NVPTX,626,"}



The next statement would most likely be a conditional statement, based on the boolean variable ""Is64Bit""."
LLVM,NVPTX,627,"The next statement could be a closing curly brace, marking the end of the return statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,628,"if ( MFI . isFixedObjectIndex ( FI ) { ""if ( FromTerm !=NAN) { print ('edd)'
 

print(""if ( FrameReg !=NAN) { print ('bah)"")"
LLVM,NVPTX,629,return "}"
LLVM,NVPTX,630,"return new FrameLowering(StackGrowsDown, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>)"
LLVM,NVPTX,631,"The next statement is likely a function or method call, or an assignment operation, using the variables/objects ""tm"" and ""is64bit"" as arguments or operands."
LLVM,NVPTX,632,return is64bit;
LLVM,NVPTX,633,"MR is not empty, so MI is built using the instruction information obtained from the CvtaLocalOpcode with an added register."
LLVM,NVPTX,634,"<s>

return MFI.getObjectOffset(fI);"
LLVM,NVPTX,635,The next statement could be to assign the value of the object offset of FI to a variable named FrameReg.
LLVM,NVPTX,636,"BuildMI (MBB, MI, dl, MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo()->get(PCI LtOpcode),
<STR_LIT>).addReg(<STR_LIT>).addImm(0);"
LLVM,NVPTX,637,"MI->addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Kill);"
LLVM,NVPTX,638,"The next statement will be an if statement or an else statement, since the closing bracket for the if statement was just included in the previous code."
LLVM,NVPTX,639,"</s>

Create a machine instruction with a function number and add it to the basic block's end."
LLVM,NVPTX,640,"A potential statement within the code snippet could be:

BuildMI (MBB, MI, dl, tm .getInstrInfo()->get(<STR_LIT>), <STR_LIT>).addReg(<STR_LIT>).addImm(<VAL>);

This statement would add an immediate value to the machine instruction being built."
LLVM,NVPTX,641,"The next statement could be: 
""// TODO: implement emitEpilogue logic for FrameLowering"""
LLVM,NVPTX,642,"The next statement will most likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,643,"} else { if ( is64bit ) BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , dl , tm . getInstrInfo ( ) -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) , <STR_LIT> ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) ; else BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , dl , tm . getInstrInfo ( ) -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) , <STR_LIT> ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,644,"The next statement is likely to be another instruction being built using the BuildMI function, possibly with different parameters such as a different virtual register or instruction type."
LLVM,NVPTX,645,"""Return to calling function."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,647,"The next statement will add the instruction to the basic block and specify the debug location, target machine instruction info, and register for the local register."
LLVM,NVPTX,648,The next statement is adding an immediate representing the function number to the machine instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,649,"const TargetInstrInfo <ISA_LIT> * TII = MF . <s>

TII -> getFrameInstrReference(MFI, FrameReg);"
LLVM,NVPTX,650,"The code snippet is creating a virtual register and adding an instruction to set the value of the virtual register depending on whether the variable is64bit is true or false. Therefore, the next statement would be to execute the code inside the if statement, which would create a virtual register and add the corresponding instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,651,The code will now check if a function number is present and add it to the instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,652,return STI.is64Bit() ? 1 : 0;
LLVM,NVPTX,653,This code snippet initializes a FrameLowering object using the constructor with a Subtarget argument and several other arguments. It sets the target frame direction to StackGrowsUp and passes values to represent a numeric and 64-bit data type.
LLVM,NVPTX,654,The "if" condition will return False.
LLVM,NVPTX,655,"The code snippet is likely to continue with an if statement, possibly for checking the type of a variable or function. It may also continue with additional operations on the variable ""CVTA"" and/or ""DestTy""."
LLVM,NVPTX,656,The next statement could be: Function *Func = M.getFunction("my_function");
LLVM,NVPTX,657,"else {
  NewValue = nullptr;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,658,"O


The next statement could be ""NewOperand = OperandChanged ? NewOperand : Operand;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,659,"}

return N ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,660,"N ->setOperand(i, NewOperands)"
LLVM,NVPTX,661,"</s>


The statement would likely be the closing bracket for the function definition: }"
LLVM,NVPTX,662,It is not possible to predict the next statement with only the given code snippet as it is incomplete.
LLVM,NVPTX,663,"}

if (Instruction::isCall(Opcode)) {
    return Builder.CreateCall(C, makeArrayRef(&NewOperands[<NUM_LIT>], NumOperands - <NUM_LIT>));
} else {
    return Builder.CreateIntrinsic(C, makeArrayRef(&NewOperands[<NUM_LIT>], NumOperands - <NUM_LIT>));
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,664,The code will then assert that GVMap is empty.
LLVM,NVPTX,665,"CVTA = Builder . CreateBitCast ( CVTA , DestTy , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,666,const DataLayout & DL = Ms
LLVM,NVPTX,667,"The code will check if the ""OperandChanged"" variable is false and, if so, execute the statement between the curly braces."
LLVM,NVPTX,668,The following statement will likely be a closing bracket (}) to end the function and scope.
LLVM,NVPTX,669,"}


The next statement could be:
```
Module::iterator I = M.begin(); //Initialize iterator I to the beginning of the Module M
```"
LLVM,NVPTX,670,Clear the ValueToValueMapTy VM.
LLVM,NVPTX,671,"GV -> eraseFromParent ( ) ; }

The next statement is ""ConstantToValueMap.clear();""."
LLVM,NVPTX,672,"</s>

The next statement could be creating a constant value for the current address space, or it could be creating a new call instruction to the function that converts the value to the new address space."
LLVM,NVPTX,673,"}</s>

if (isa<ConstantArray>(C)) {
    NewValue = remapConstantArray(M, F, C, Builder);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,674,The next statement would be "return NewValue;".
LLVM,NVPTX,675,return C;
LLVM,NVPTX,676,The next statement is likely a closing curly brace to close the if/else statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,677,The next statement is: "ValueToValueMapTy VM ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,678,"return Builder . CreateGEP ( C -> getPointerOperand ( ) , NewOperands ) ;

The next statement will be ""case Instruction::Call: return Builder.CreateCall(C, NewOperands);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,679,"The next statement would likely be another case statement, checking for a different instruction, or an if statement checking for a binary operation or a cast operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,680,"++ II )

{
    if (GVMap[GV] == NULL) {
        /* Do something */
    }
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,681,The code will iterate through the named metadata in the module and then through the global variables in the GVMap.
LLVM,NVPTX,682,"NewOperand = M -> getValue <s>
 (NewOperand)"
LLVM,NVPTX,683,The next statement is: "if (GVMap.empty()) {return false;}".
LLVM,NVPTX,684,">

<i>[Expected output:]</i> This code continues to check each BasicBlock and replace any constants with the values from the ConstantToValueMap."
LLVM,NVPTX,685,"The next statement will likely check to see if there is a ""small vector"" (possibly referring to a container type) present in the code and, if so, will likely push it into the existing code before continuing."
LLVM,NVPTX,686,"list

Function *CVTAFunction = Function::Create(FunctionType::get(DestTy, ParamTypes, false), Function::ExternalLinkage, ""<STR_LIT>"", M);"
LLVM,NVPTX,687,The next statement is "i < e; ++i)"
LLVM,NVPTX,688,"I != E ; ++ I )
The next statement could be a closing bracket, as there is a closing bracket present after the last for-loop in the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,689,"""Use the createGenericToNVVMPass function to create a new instance of the GenericToNVVM pass."""
LLVM,NVPTX,690,return new GenericToNVVMPass();
LLVM,NVPTX,691,}
LLVM,NVPTX,692,"raiseError( ""GenericToNVVM - No NVGPU target found ! Error in reusing empty generic nvvm module . "" )




exit();"
LLVM,NVPTX,693,"</s>

<s> Superclass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,694,"</s>

""AU should be passed to getAnalysisUsage as a constant argument"""
LLVM,NVPTX,695,"if (GV != nullptr) {
  Value *NewValue = GV;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,696,"remapConstantVectorOrConstantAggregate ( M , F , C , Builder )"
LLVM,NVPTX,697,The next statement is "llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)" because it is part of the "default" case and the code above it does not apply to any of the previous cases.
LLVM,NVPTX,698,"Value * NewValue = PoisonValue :: get ( C -> getType ( ) ) ; if ( isa < ConstantVector > ( C ) ) { for ( unsigned i = <NUM_LIT> ; i < NumOperands ; ++ i ) { Value * Idx = ConstantInt :: get ( Type :: getInt32Ty ( M -> getContext ( ) ) , i ) ; (NewValue = Builder.CreateInsertElement(NewValue, NewOperands[i], Idx)) ; 
} } else { for ( unsigned i = <NUM_LIT> ; i < NumOperands ; ++ i ) { (NewValue = Builder"
LLVM,NVPTX,699,"if ( Name . startswith ( <STR_LIT> ) ) {
The code is checking whether the address space of a global variable is generic, and if it is not associated with a texture, surface, or sampler, and its name does not start with a specific string, a new global variable is created with the same characteristics but in the global address space. Then, attributes are copied from the original global variable to the new one. Afterwards, the code goes through the module, skipping declarations, and uses an IRBuilder to loop through each function, basic block, and instruction to replace constants with an updated version. Finally, a new"
LLVM,NVPTX,700,"Most likely, the next statement would be the end of the function or method that this code snippet is a part of."
LLVM,NVPTX,701,"}

The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace for the ""if"" statement, followed by the closing curly brace for the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,702,"}

""Return the next statement of this code snippet."""
LLVM,NVPTX,703,"}

""Next, the code snippet will create a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>ImageOptimizer class using the ""new"" keyword."""
LLVM,NVPTX,704,"// Body of constructor 
The next statement is likely to be a line of code defining the body of the constructor for the ImageOptimizer class, which may include initialization of variables or calling other functions."
LLVM,NVPTX,705,"</s>

// Define constructor for ImageOptimizer class to inherit from FunctionPass with ID as parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,706,"} </s>

The next statement will be: else { return false; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,707,This function checks the type of an image operation and replaces it with a corresponding surface operation.
LLVM,NVPTX,708,"The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the ""if"" statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,709,<i> return true ;
LLVM,NVPTX,710,"else if
Single instruction is a conditional statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,711,"<s> BranchInst::Create (Dest, BI);"
LLVM,NVPTX,712,"</s>

Next, the code will push the branch instruction to a list of instructions to be deleted."
LLVM,NVPTX,713,"return Changed ; }

The next statement is a closing curly brace for the <STR_LIT> case."
LLVM,NVPTX,714,The next statement will be "return false;".
LLVM,NVPTX,715,FALSE
LLVM,NVPTX,716,The next statement is a closing curly brace to end the switch statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,717,"</s>

if (isa<Argument>(V)) {
    VisitArgument(cast<Argument>(V));
  }"
LLVM,NVPTX,718,GetElementPtr constant expression with modified address space and updated operands.
LLVM,NVPTX,719,}<NUM_LIT> NewOperands.push_back(Operand);
LLVM,NVPTX,720,} break;
LLVM,NVPTX,721,"PostorderStack}}

empty statement"
LLVM,NVPTX,722,"appendsGenericAddressExpressionToPostorderStack ( I . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , & PostorderStack , & Visited ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,723,"""The FunctionPass * object llvm::create<ISA_LIT>InferAddressSpacesPass will be returned."""
LLVM,NVPTX,724,"{ return SmallVector < Value * , <NUM_LIT> > ( None, static_cast <NUM_LIT> ( 0 ) ) ; }

The code will return a SmallVector containing a number of values, which is equal to the number of incoming values of the PHI instruction or 0 if the instruction is a BitCast, AddrSpaceCast, or GetElementPtr."
LLVM,NVPTX,725,"The code will return the operand of the GetElementPtr instruction at index <NUM_LIT>, within a list containing all incoming values of the PHINode instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,726,">

The next statement is an if statement that checks if the value of NewAS has not been assigned a value."
LLVM,NVPTX,727,"XYZ

switch ( cast <Operator>(V).getOpcode() ) { case X: break; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,728,return AS1;
LLVM,NVPTX,729,"</ISA_LIT>

s <ISA_LIT> FinalizeAddressSpaces ( ) : FunctionPass ( ID ) { </ISA_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,730,"</ISA_LIT>

- <BODY>"
LLVM,NVPTX,731,return UndefValue::get(Operand->getType()->getPointerElementType()->getPointerTo(NewAddrSpace));
LLVM,NVPTX,732,"I -> replaceUsesOfWith ( V , NewV ) ; }
The next statement of the code snippet is a closing curly brace for the second for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,733,"for (BasicBlock &BB : F) {
  for (Instruction &I : BB) {
    if (isa<AddrSpaceCastInst>(I)) {
      Value *SourceValue = I->getOperand(0);
      Value *TargetValue = &I;

The code snippet will most likely be checking for instances of an AddrSpaceCast instruction in the current basic block within the function F. It will then retrieve the source and target values for the instruction and store them in the variables SourceValue and TargetValue respectively."
LLVM,NVPTX,734,"Next, the code will create a new variable called ""Postorder"" and assign it the result of a function called ""collectGenericAddressExpressions"" with the argument ""F"". It will also create a new variable called ""InferredAddrSpace"" of the type ""ValueToAddrSpaceMapTy""."
LLVM,NVPTX,735,"if (NewAS < OldAS) {
  return NewAS;
} else {
  return OldAS;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,736,"This code snippet creates a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>InstPrinter class, passing in references to the <ISA_LIT>MCAsmInfo, <ISA_LIT>MCInstrInfo, and <ISA_LIT>MCRegisterInfo classes. It then calls the constructor of the <ISA_LIT>MCInstPrinter class, passing in the same references."
LLVM,NVPTX,737,"This code snippet is likely a constructor method for an InstPrinter class. It takes in a MCAsmInfo, MCInstrInfo, and MCRegisterInfo as parameters and then calls the MCInstPrinter constructor with those parameters. It may be used to initialize the InstPrinter object and set the values of its member variables."
LLVM,NVPTX,738,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of the variables MI, Address, OS, and Annot. The next statement could be any valid instruction or function call."
LLVM,NVPTX,739,"}

The next statement could be:

if (Imm == <STR_LIT> :: Unsigned) O << <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,740,"}
 ""if (Imm >= <NUM_LIT>) O << <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,741,O << markup ( <EXPR> ) << formatExpr ( Op . getExpr ( ) ) << markup ( <EXPR> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,742,"The next statement will be an if statement checking if the operand is an immediate value, followed by printing the formatted immediate value surrounded by markup tags."
LLVM,NVPTX,743,"</s>

OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ; default: OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,744,"</s>

printError ( MI , OS ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,745,"case <STR_LIT> :: RZ : O << <STR_LIT> ; break ; } }

Depending on the values of the variables involved, the next statement could be any of the following:
- O << <STR_LIT> (this statement is repeated four times throughout the code snippet)
- return
- break
- O << <STR_LIT> (specifically, depending on the value of <STR_LIT>, this statement could be any of <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>:: FTZ_FLAG, <STR_LIT>:: SAT_FLAG, or <STR_LIT>:: RELU_FLAG)"
LLVM,NVPTX,746,The next statement is likely to be an if/else statement or a switch statement that contains the code snippet shown.
LLVM,NVPTX,747,"There is not enough information in this code snippet to accurately predict the next statement. It appears to be a segment of switch case statements, so the next statement could be another case statement or a default statement. It would depend on the rest of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,748,"The next statement would be:

OS << RegNo;"
LLVM,NVPTX,749,"This statement would most likely be a function or method call, as indicated by the parentheses after ""setAvailableFeatures""."
LLVM,NVPTX,750,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,751,O << <STR_LIT> ; break
LLVM,NVPTX,752,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,753,"}

The next statement is the end curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,NVPTX,754,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. It could be anything from a blank line to a specific coding instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,755,O << "default" ;
LLVM,NVPTX,756,"printOperand(MI, OpNum + <NUM_LIT> + 1, O);"
LLVM,NVPTX,757,assert ( Op . isExpr ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,758,"""In the next line, the MCSymbolRefExpr pointed to by Expr will be dereferenced to obtain the symbol referenced by Sym."""
LLVM,NVPTX,759,"}

<s>return RegInfo;"
LLVM,NVPTX,760,"The next code snippet will be another ""else if"" statement checking if DestRC is equal to &<STR_LIT>. It will then perform the same action as the previous ""if"" statement, building an MI with the given parameters and adding a register with the appropriate kill state."
LLVM,NVPTX,761,"} else { assert ( Cond . empty ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; <EOG>

This code snippet ends here."
LLVM,NVPTX,762,return <ISA_LIT>RegInfo ( * TM . getSubtargetImpl ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,763,"Most likely, the next statement will be related to the construction or initialization of the InstrInfo object. It could be something like creating variables or setting values for specific properties of the object."
LLVM,NVPTX,764,"There will be a BuildMI function called on the MBB, I, DL, and get(Op) parameters, with a new DestReg and SrcReg added using the getKillRegState(KillSrc) function."
LLVM,NVPTX,765,The next statement would either be another else if statement or the else statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,766,"Op = ( SrcRC == & <STR_LIT> ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ;
<STR_LIT>

This code snippet appears to be a function that copies the value of a physical register to another physical register. The next statement would likely involve assigning the value of the source register to the destination register using the operation determined in the previous if-else statements. It could be something like ""MBB.addInstr(Op, DestReg, SrcReg, KillSrc)"" where ""Op"" is the determined operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,767,"}

llvm_unreachable( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,768,"BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) . add ( Cond [ <NUM_LIT> ] ) . addMBB ( FBB ) ; return <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,769,The code will return NUM_LIT.
LLVM,NVPTX,770,"}

Explanation

The next statement will likely be the end bracket for the InstrInfo constructor, followed by a semicolon to end the initialization list."
LLVM,NVPTX,771,This code snippet initializes an object of type InstrInfo by calling the constructor of the base class RegInfo.
LLVM,NVPTX,772,The next statement will likely be a curly brace to indicate the end of the anchor function.
LLVM,NVPTX,773,"</s>

The next statement could be a return or an end curly brace (})."
LLVM,NVPTX,774,"}

else {
    llvm_unreachable( <STR_LIT> );
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,775,The code snippet will finish executing the if statement and return the value <NUM_LIT> after executing the last BuildMI statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,776,"}</ISA_LIT></ISA_LIT>


""This code snippet defines a class called InstrInfo, inheriting from GenInstrInfo and RegInfo, with an empty constructor."""
LLVM,NVPTX,777,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the code snippet. Please provide more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,778,"""return <NUM_LIT>;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,779,"</s>

The next statement could be an ""assert"" statement that checks the condition of I being at the end of the MachineBasicBlock MBB."
LLVM,NVPTX,780,"BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get(<STR_LIT>)).addMBB(FBB);"
LLVM,NVPTX,781,The next statement will initialize the function body for the InstrInfo class.
LLVM,NVPTX,782,"This code snippet defines a constructor function for the InstrInfo class, which takes in a Subtarget reference as an argument. It inherits from the GenInstrInfo class and also uses a RegInfo object with the given Subtarget."
LLVM,NVPTX,783,"}

This code snippet does not have a clear next statement and may end here. It appears to be setting the value of the variable ""Op"" based on the comparison of ""DestRC"" and ""SrcRC"" to certain values. It could also continue with additional if/else if statements evaluating different register classes and setting the value of ""Op"" accordingly."
LLVM,NVPTX,784,I = LastInst ;
LLVM,NVPTX,785,The next statement is "return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,786,"The next statement will be: 
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,787,"This code snippet will return <NUM_LIT> and then continue by adding another statement to the code that adds the MBB and DL to the TBB and FBB, respectively, before returning <NUM_LIT> again."
LLVM,NVPTX,788,"Probably something along the lines of: ""Otherwise, execute the following instructions."""
LLVM,NVPTX,789,"BuildMI ( MBB , I , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) , DestReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg , getKillRegState ( KillSrc ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,790,<Builds a machine instruction with the given parameters and adds it to the specified machine basic block at the specified position>
LLVM,NVPTX,791,"}

The next statement could possibly be an ""else"" statement that assigns a default value to Op."
LLVM,NVPTX,792,"</s>

The next statement is probably checking if FBB is not null in the assert statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,793,"}

The next statement is a conditional statement that checks if the SecondLastInst and LastInst both have the opcode <STR_LIT>, and if so, assigns their corresponding operands to TBB and adds them to the Cond vector. It then assigns LastInst to I and erases it from the parent if allowed. If the condition is not met, the function returns true."
LLVM,NVPTX,794,The next statement is "TBB = LastInst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getMBB();".
LLVM,NVPTX,795,"""return true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,796,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the specific code and input values being used. The code could return any number of potential values depending on the context.
LLVM,NVPTX,797,NextStatement: if ( SecondLastInst -
LLVM,NVPTX,798,The next statement would be the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,799,"This code snippet checks if both DestReg and SrcReg are contained in <STR_LIT>, and if they are, it builds a machine instruction (MI) with the given parameters. It appears that the same MI is being built in both the if and else if statements, so the next statement will likely be a repetition of the same code or a break/return statement to exit the conditional."
LLVM,NVPTX,800,return MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getImm();
LLVM,NVPTX,801,It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is no way to determine the contents or context of the variable "RegInfo." It could be used in a number of ways or not at all.
LLVM,NVPTX,802,"</ISA_LIT>


 <s> const const <ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo & getRegisterInfo ( ) const { </ISA_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,803,"BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) . addReg ( Cond [ <NUM_LIT> ] . getReg ( ) ) . addMBB ( FBB ) ; return <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,804,"}


The next statement is BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get(<STR_LIT>)) .addMBB(FBB);"
LLVM,NVPTX,805,"</STR_LIT></ISA_LIT>


If the value of TSFlags is equal to <NUM_LIT>, set the AddrSpace variable to the value returned by the getLdStCodeAddrSpace function on the MachineInstr object MI."
LLVM,NVPTX,806,The code will return the value of isLoad.
LLVM,NVPTX,807,"}

The next statement is likely to involve using the variables dest and src to perform some sort of move operation. This could potentially involve using the variables to assign a value or perform an operation between them."
LLVM,NVPTX,808,MachineOperand src = MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,NVPTX,809,The next statement would be "if(!isStore) return 0;"
LLVM,NVPTX,810,"</s>


The next statement is the closing curly brace, indicating the end of the constructor function for the ""InstrInfo"" class."
LLVM,NVPTX,811,"</s>

""Initialize the register information using the subtarget implementation provided by the target machine."""
LLVM,NVPTX,812,return <NUM_LIT> as the final line of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,813,"If none of the previous conditions are met, return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,814,"The next statement is likely to be related to manipulating the data at the specified location, using the getTargetConstant function on the current DAG while passing in the Imm variable, DL variable, and the <STR_LIT> variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,815,"This code snippet returns the target constant with the specified immediate value and debug location, using a string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,816,"return ""ProcessPass"";
}

The next statement would be:

""return ProcessPass"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,817,"The code snippet will likely return the result of the SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction function, possibly using the Subtarget variable obtained through the static_cast."
LLVM,NVPTX,818,SDValue Result = Node;
LLVM,NVPTX,819,"</s>

The next statement would be a return statement with the result of the TL->allowFMA(*MF, OptLevel) function call."
LLVM,NVPTX,820,"False

Explanation: The predict statement should be a boolean value, and the next statement in this code snippet is the call to the allowUnsafeFPMath() function, which returns true or false."
LLVM,NVPTX,821,"The next statement would be ""if TL is not null, execute the allowUnsafeFPMath method on the target lowering object using the MF parameter."""
LLVM,NVPTX,822,"if ( ! IsKernelFn && N -> getValueType ( ) == VoidTy ) {""

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,823,The next statement is likely to be an "else" statement or another conditional statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,824,"</s>

""return false;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,825,No prediction can be made without knowing the specific code snippet in question.
LLVM,NVPTX,826,"} }

return <STR_LIT> :: GENERIC ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,827,"return IsSigned ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement of this code snippet is likely another ""case"" statement, starting with the keyword ""case"" and followed by a <STR_LIT> (string literal) or variable name for the conditional statement. This pattern appears to repeat throughout the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,828,"default : llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;

None, the code snippet ends with the statement ""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)"" and does not continue with another case."
LLVM,NVPTX,829,return Subtarget->hasDivF32() ? 0 : -1
LLVM,NVPTX,830,"return CurDAG -> getTargetConstant ( Imm , DL , <INT32> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,831,";

return getConstant(DL, MVT::i32, Imm);"
LLVM,NVPTX,832,The next statement will most likely return a string literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,833,"""}"
LLVM,NVPTX,834,"case <STR_LIT> : return CmpMode :: LE ;

 return CmpMode :: NE;"
LLVM,NVPTX,835,"The next statement will likely begin with curly braces, indicating the start of a code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,836,"</s>

The code snippet will return the result of the SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(MF) function."
LLVM,NVPTX,837,Subtarget->addPassesToEmitMC();
LLVM,NVPTX,838,"</s>


""return false;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,839,"</s>


return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,840,"}
The next statement could be a return statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,841,"< /s>

}else"
LLVM,NVPTX,842,"</s>

    if (OpNode->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) {
        Base = Addr.getOperand(0);
        Offset = Addr.getOperand(1);
    }"
LLVM,NVPTX,843,"The next statement will check the condition inside the second if statement, and if it is true, execute the specified code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,844,"</s>

This code snippet is defining a function called SelectADDRsi_imp that takes in several parameters (OpNode, Addr, Base, Offset, and mvt). The function first checks if the opcode of Addr is equal to <STR_LIT>. If so, it then checks if the operand of Addr (at index <NUM_LIT>) is a ConstantSDNode. If both conditions are met, it sets the variable base to the operand at index <NUM_LIT> and checks if it can be selected as a direct address (using the function SelectDirectAddr). If it can be selected, the function sets the variable Offset"
LLVM,NVPTX,845,"The next statement is:

Opc = TM.is64Bit() ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,846,"</s>

The next statement will check if the opcode of N is equal to <STR_LIT> or <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,847,"""Succesfully pushed Op0 and CurDAG->getTargetConstant onto OutOps, and returned false."""
LLVM,NVPTX,848,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,849,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information about the code and its purpose. However, it is likely that the code will involve a declaration or assignment of some sort involving the variables ""SDLoc,"" ""DL,"" and ""N."""
LLVM,NVPTX,850,"Creating a new register



return nullptr;"
LLVM,NVPTX,851,"/// }


No additional statements."
LLVM,NVPTX,852,"</s>

else return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,853,"""SDNode * LoadConstF16 has been replaced with the machine node created by CurDAG, with the value Val."""
LLVM,NVPTX,854,"}

return E0[0]->getOperand(1) * E1[0]->getOperand(1)"
LLVM,NVPTX,855,"</s>


break;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,856,"The next statement will be: CurDAG -> setNodeMemRefs ( cast < MachineSDNode > ( <ISA_LIT>LD ) , { MemRef } ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,857,"Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT(MemVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, None);"
LLVM,NVPTX,858,"SDValue Ops [ ] = { Value , getI32Imm ( isVolatile , dl ) , getI32Imm ( CodeAddrSpace , dl ) , getI32Imm ( vecType , dl ) , getI32Imm ( toType , dl ) , getI32Imm ( toTypeWidth , dl ) , Base , getI32Imm ( Offset , dl ) , Chain } ;


The code snippet appears to be building a Store node for a specific ISA. The next statement would likely involve setting the new Store node as a child node of the current DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) using the CurDAG"
LLVM,NVPTX,859,The code will set the values for the machine nodes and then create a MachineMemOperand for the memory reference before setting the node memory references and returning the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,860,"</s>

This code snippet calls the ""useF32FTZ"" function on the ""getTargetLowering"" function of the ""Subtarget"" object, passing in the ""MF"" object, and then returns the result."
LLVM,NVPTX,861,It is likely the next statement would involve using the target-specific instruction for square root on a 32-bit floating-point number.
LLVM,NVPTX,862,It will return the result of the TM.useShortPointers() function call.
LLVM,NVPTX,863,"The next statement could be:
if (Src == NULL) 
    return false;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,864,No prediction can be made as the next statement would depend on the specific input or context of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,865,We cannot predict the next statement as it is missing crucial information such as the input or function being evaluated. This code snippet alone does not provide enough information to make a prediction.
LLVM,NVPTX,866,"We can't predict the next statement as it depends on the specific values of Src and PT, as well as the specific conditions in the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,867,The next statement could be something related to the optimization level and using precise operations for division and square roots with floats.
LLVM,NVPTX,868,default;
LLVM,NVPTX,869,FALSE
LLVM,NVPTX,870,"</s>

if (Addr.getOpcode() == <STR_LIT> && Addr.getOpcode() == <ADD_LIT>) {"
LLVM,NVPTX,871,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,872,">


The next statement will likely check if SelectDirectAddr was successful."
LLVM,NVPTX,873,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return NULL ; } }



The next statement will be ""SDValue Ops [ ] = { getI32Imm ( isVolatile ) , getI32Imm ( codeAddrSpace ) , getI32Imm ( vecType ) , getI32Imm ( fromType ) , getI32Imm ( fromTypeWidth ) , Base , Offset , Chain } ; <ISA_LIT>LD = CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( Opcode"
LLVM,NVPTX,874,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT>
This code snippet is used to construct a series of cases and switches in order to assign a specific opcode to the variable ""Opcode"" based on the value of ""NumElts"" and the memory type. The next statement could be another case or break statement, or it could be a line of code that uses the value of ""Opcode"" to perform a specific operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,875,"break ;

The next statement will be ""case <NUM_LIT>:"" followed by a switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,876,"}

The next statement will most likely be ""return true;""."
LLVM,NVPTX,877,"If ""N"" is not equal to any of the specified <STR_LIT> cases, the code will proceed to the default case, where SelectMatchAll (N) will be called and return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,878,The next statement would be to return true.
LLVM,NVPTX,879,"Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT ( EltVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , None , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , None ) ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT ( EltVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy , <STR_LIT> , None , None , None , None , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , None ) ; break ; } } else { switch ( N"
LLVM,NVPTX,880,"Ops [ <NUM_LIT> ] = SDValue ( Cvt , <NUM_LIT> ) ; return false ; }

The next statement in this code snippet will be to return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,881,"Ops [ <NUM_LIT> ] = SDValue ( Cvt , <NUM_LIT> ) ; break ; }</s>

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,882,"default : return false ;

case <STR_LIT>: Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT(EltVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, None, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, None); break; } 

if (!Opcode) return false;

SDValue Ops[] = {getI32Imm(IsVolatile, DL), getI32Imm(CodeAddrSpace, DL), getI32Imm(VecType, DL), getI32Imm(FromType, DL), getI32Imm(FromTypeWidth, DL"
LLVM,NVPTX,883,"case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT ( EltVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , None , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , None ) ; break ; }

if (! Opcode) return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,884,"If the value of PointerSize is not equal to the specified <NUM_LIT>, the code will continue to execute the else if statement and assign the value of Opcode based on the result of the function pickOpcodeForVT. It will then create the Ops array using the SDValue variables and call the getMachineNode function to create a new machine instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,885,"""} else { if ( TM . Options . UnsafeFPMath ) return <NUM_LIT> ; else if (TM.Options.FastMath) return <NUM_LIT> ; else return <NUM_LIT> ; }"""
LLVM,NVPTX,886,doFMAF128AGG = ( OptLevel > <NUM_LIT> ) && Subtarget . hasFMAF128 ( ) && ( FMAContractLevel == <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,887,"The next statement will likely involve the usage of the previously defined variables, doFMAF32AGG and doFMAF64AGG, possibly in a conditional statement or in an arithmetic operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,888,"ResNode = SelectStoreParam ( N ) ; break ;

default: ResNode = NULL;"
LLVM,NVPTX,889,"Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = EVT :: getVectorVT ( ) ; }

case <STR_LIT> : return NULL ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,890,"</s>

The next statement could be the end of the if/else statement, with the closing curly brace and semicolon. This would mark the end of the code block and return to the main program flow."
LLVM,NVPTX,891,"""Otherwise, return false."""
LLVM,NVPTX,892,"}
True"
LLVM,NVPTX,893,"if ( spN == 0 ) {
  return (PT->isZero())
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,894,Either there is a break statement or an error message if none of the cases match.
LLVM,NVPTX,895,return NULL;
LLVM,NVPTX,896,"}

The next statement is:
return NULL;"
LLVM,NVPTX,897,The code will break out of the current loop and continue to execute the rest of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,898,return nullptr;
LLVM,NVPTX,899,"case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ;
nullptr"
LLVM,NVPTX,900,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ;

The code snippet ends."
LLVM,NVPTX,901,"Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ;	
The next statement is likely ""break;"" after the final ""case <NUM_LIT>:"" switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,902,"return CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( <STR_LIT> , SDLoc ( N ) , <STR_LIT> , GlobalVal ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,903,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context and information about the variables and functions used in the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,904,"if ( F && F -> <BOP_LIT> ) {

Predicted sequence:

""return F->hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoFiniteMath)"""
LLVM,NVPTX,905,There is no more code to be executed.
LLVM,NVPTX,906,"return true ; } <\/s>

The next statement will be an if statement checking if the number of occurrences of <UsePrecSqrtF32> is greater than <NUM_LIT>, and if so, it will return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,907,return TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl()->hasFMA();
LLVM,NVPTX,908,"</s>

<s>Maybe it would be used to retrieve lower-level target information to optimize performance.</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,909,The next statement will return true if spN equals <NUM_LIT> and mN's memory operand has a pseudo value.
LLVM,NVPTX,910,Case llvm :: ADDRESS_SPACE_CONST : return <STR_LIT> :: CONSTANT ;
LLVM,NVPTX,911,"if (Subtarget.hasAddressSpace1024()) {
  return STR_LIT::LOCAL;
 }"
LLVM,NVPTX,912,"""Override the default Subtarget and set it to the target machine's subtarget."""
LLVM,NVPTX,913,"CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opc, SDLoc(N), N->getValueType(<NUM_LIT>), Src);"
LLVM,NVPTX,914,"else { return NULL ;


The next statement would be: SDValue AndNom = N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,NVPTX,915,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return nullptr ; } }
SDValue Ops[] = {N1, getI32Imm(isVolatile), getI32Imm(codeAddrSpace), getI32Imm(vecType), getI32Imm(toType), getI32Imm(toTypeWidth), Base, Offset"
LLVM,NVPTX,916,"case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return nullptr ; } }

The next statement to be predicted is:

SDValue Ops[] = { N1, getI32Imm(isVolatile), getI32Imm(codeAddrSpace), getI32Imm(vecType), getI32Imm(toType), getI32Imm(toTypeWidth), Base, Offset, Chain }; <ISA_LIT>ST = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opcode, dl, <STR_LIT>, Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,917,"The next statement will depend on the value of ResNode, if it is truthy, the code will return ResNode. If not, the code will continue on to the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,918,"case <STR_LIT> :

The next statement is:
Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,919,"</s>
return isa<ConstantAddrSpaceCastInst>(Src);"
LLVM,NVPTX,920,"case INT_ </class>>

<STR_LIT> :: LOCAL"
LLVM,NVPTX,921,allowRecipEst = (OptLevel > 2) && Subtarget.hasFP32Denormals( ) && (allowApprox)
LLVM,NVPTX,922,"The code will check if the variable ResNode has a value and if it does, it will return that value. Otherwise, the code will terminate without returning anything."
LLVM,NVPTX,923,if ( Addr.getValueType() == MVT::i32 )
LLVM,NVPTX,924,"The next statement would likely be:
return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,925,"return false ; }

If (Addr .getOperand(0) != <STR_LIT>) {  return true; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,926,The next statement is: return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,927,The next statement is likely a closing curly brace to end the nested if statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,928,"}



if (SelectVADDRri(Op.getNode(), Op, Op0, Op1)) {
  OutOps.push_back(Op0);
  OutOps.push_back(Op1);
  return false;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,929,"<STR_LIT> Retval = <STR_LIT> }

The next statement would be: ""return true ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,930,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ;

In this code snippet, the next statement is most likely another ""break"" statement, as the switch statement has already been executed and the code is moving on to the next case."
LLVM,NVPTX,931,The next statement will be "default : return false ;".
LLVM,NVPTX,932,"""The next statement is a switch statement with a condition based on the address space of the pointer type."""
LLVM,NVPTX,933,"return <STR_LIT>

:: PARAMETER ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,934,ResNode = SelectStoreVector ( N ) ; break ;
LLVM,NVPTX,935,"case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; 

The code will likely continue with additional switch statements and cases for different operations and data types."
LLVM,NVPTX,936,"SDValue Ops [ ] = { Op1 , Chain } ; LD = CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( Opcode , DL , N -> getVTList ( ) , Ops ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,937,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return NULL ; } } else { switch ( Opcode ) { case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return NULL ; } }

In this code snippet, the next statement will be the end of the if/else structure,"
LLVM,NVPTX,938,"break ; default : return NULL ; } SDValue Ops < > = { N1 , getI32Imm ( isVolatile ) , getI32Imm ( codeAddrSpace ) } ;


The next statement will likely be switch (SourceVT) again, as the code seems to be checking for the different possible types of operands for a <ISA_LIT>ST instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,939,return;
LLVM,NVPTX,940,"Opc = Subtarget -> is64Bit ( ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; break ; }

return CurDAG -> getMachineNode(Opc, SDLoc(N), N->getValueType(0), Src);"
LLVM,NVPTX,941,"return CurDAG -> getMachineNode (Opc, SDLoc (N), N ->getValueType(N), Src);"
LLVM,NVPTX,942,} } else { switch ( TargetVT ) { case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : return nullptr ; } } SDValue Ops [ ] = { getI
LLVM,NVPTX,943,"}

<> <ISA_LIT>ST = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opcode, dl, <STR_LIT>, Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,944,"case <STR_LIT> :

The next statement would be:

ResNode = SelectTextureIntrinsic ( N ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,945,"The code snippet will push the values of TexRef, SampRef, and all subsequent operands onto the vector Ops. It will then push the value of Chain onto the vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,946,"case ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED : Opc = TM . is64Bit ( ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; break ; case ADDRESS_SPACE_CONST : Opc = TM . is64Bit ( ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; break ; case ADDRESS_SPACE_LOCAL : Opc = TM . is64Bit ( ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; break ; } return CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( Opc , SDLoc ( N ) , N -> getValueType ( <NUM_LIT> ) , Src ) ; }

The next statement"
LLVM,NVPTX,947,"if ( VecSize > <NUM_LIT>) { VTs = CurDAG -> getVTList ( EltVT , EltVT , EltVT , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,948,The next statement is "case <NUM_LIT> : switch ( MemVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return nullptr ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opc = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT
LLVM,NVPTX,949,if ( Variant == WMMA_VARIANT_BVAR ) Variant = WMMA_VARIANT_BVAR_STRIDE ;
LLVM,NVPTX,950,"OpcodeIndex, OpcodeIndex };

OpcodeIndex, OpcodeIndex"
LLVM,NVPTX,951,if (ConstantSDNode *MaskConst = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(MaskOp)) {
LLVM,NVPTX,952,No prediction can be made as the code snippet is missing essential syntax elements and context.
LLVM,NVPTX,953,"</s>

[s] case <NUM_LIT+1>: // the next switch case statement is being defined</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,954,The next statement is likely to be a block of code that contains multiple statements within it. It is not possible to predict the exact code without knowing the purpose of the case statements and their associated string literals.
LLVM,NVPTX,955,"}>

The next statement will likely be ""return true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,956,"""If none of the conditions in the for loop are met, the next statement will return true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,957,"""return true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,958,"Objs

.push_back(C);
Objs.push_back(C);"
LLVM,NVPTX,959,The code returns true.
LLVM,NVPTX,960,"} switch ( Opcode )

return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,961,"case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; }
The next statement will be: 
case <NUM_lit> : switch ( Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . get"
LLVM,NVPTX,962,"This code snippet likely returns the value of the allowFMA function, which determines if fused multiply-add operations are allowed at the specified optimization level."
LLVM,NVPTX,963,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ; }

The next statement will be a ""case"" statement with the string literal ""<STR_LIT>"" as its value and an ""Opcode = <STR_LIT>;"" statement to execute before the ""break"" statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,964,"return false ; }</s>

return false"
LLVM,NVPTX,965,"if (IsKernelFn) {
  return any_of(Objs, [](Value* Obj) {
    return Obj->getType()->isVectorTy() && Obj->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() == 256;
  });
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,966,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without more context. However, based on the function name and parameters, it is likely that the next statement will return a 32-bit integer value."
LLVM,NVPTX,967,"An unsigned integer value with a value of 3 

} </s>
return SDValue(Imm, MVT::i32);"
LLVM,NVPTX,968,"In the last else if statement, a variable named Opcode is initialized by calling the pickOpcodeForVT function."
LLVM,NVPTX,969,if ( OptLevel == <FLOAT_LIT> ) return false ;
LLVM,NVPTX,970,return allowUnsafeFPMath(MF);
LLVM,NVPTX,971,It is impossible to predict the next statement without more context as the current code snippet ends abruptly without a closing bracket or a return statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,972,return 0;
LLVM,NVPTX,973,"VTs . push_back ( EltVT ) ; }

The next statement could be:

EltVT = {some_element_type};"
LLVM,NVPTX,974,"The code will enter the else statement and execute the following code, pushing VT onto the ValueVTs vector and, if Offsets is not null, pushing Off onto the Offsets vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,975,The next statement is likely to involve returning a value related to the alignment of the call instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,976,"We cannot predict the next statement as it depends on the values of the variables ""ConstantExpr"", ""CalleeV"" and ""NUM_LIT""."
LLVM,NVPTX,977,"}

if (getTargetMachine().Options.UnsafeFPMath) {
    return <NUM_LIT>;
} else {
    return <NUM_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,978,"}

The next statement would be to check if the unsafe floating point math options have been enabled, and if so, return the value of the <NUM_LIT> constant."
LLVM,NVPTX,979,"The next statement will be to check if the variable VT is equal to a string literal and if so, return the TypeLegal condition. If the condition is not met, the code will continue on to the next statement, which is to call the getPreferredVectorAction() function from the TargetLoweringBase class with VT as the parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,980,The next statement will likely return TypeLegal.
LLVM,NVPTX,981,"The next statement is: 
if (ExtraSteps == ReciprocalEstimate::Enabled && Ftz) return ReciprocalEstimateOp(SDLoc(Operand), VT, DAG.getNode(ISD::FDiv, DL, VT, DAG.getConstant(1, DL), Operand), ExtraSteps);"
LLVM,NVPTX,982,"""DAG.getNode(Nod /

DAG.getNode(Nod, DL, VT, DAG.getConstant(IID, DL, "" "", Operand))"
LLVM,NVPTX,983,"if (!context) {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,984,"if (STy->isSized()) {
  return true;
} else {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,985,"None, as there is no following statement or closing bracket. It is an incomplete code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,986,The next statement could be a "break" statement or a default case that specifies what to do if none of the cases match.
LLVM,NVPTX,987,else return nullptr;
LLVM,NVPTX,988,This code snippet will generate an SDValue variable called Const that holds a shifted bitcasted APInt value.
LLVM,NVPTX,989,"Ops.push_back(DAG.getNode(III, dl, EltVT, SubOp, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(
            j+<STR_LIT>, dl)));"
LLVM,NVPTX,990,"return DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Index, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(<NUM_LIT>, dl), E0, E1, <STR_LIT>::SETNE);"
LLVM,NVPTX,991,VecIdx = -1;
LLVM,NVPTX,992,"DAG.getStore(Op.getOperand(0), SDLoc(Op), SDValue(Op.getOperand(1), 0));"
LLVM,NVPTX,993,assert(LD->isUnindexed());
LLVM,NVPTX,994,Default: llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ; }
LLVM,NVPTX,995,"} <s>

 ""Return a vector of instructions based on the data computed in the previous statements."""
LLVM,NVPTX,996,The next statement could be another if statement checking the value type (VT) for a certain condition or a return statement with a different SDValue (structured data value).
LLVM,NVPTX,997,assert (Tmp2.getValueType() == <STR_LIT2>);
LLVM,NVPTX,998,The next statement will involve the switch statement and will check the number of elements in the vector and determine the appropriate Opcode. It may also set a flag for StoreF16x2 if the vector has a specific element type.
LLVM,NVPTX,999,"Ops . push_back ( E0 ) ; Ops . push_back ( E1 ) ; } }

SDValue Store = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, MVT::Other, Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1000,<s> N1 -> getFormalName ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1001,"else return SDValue();

endif"
LLVM,NVPTX,1002,"if ( AddTo ) { AddTo = false
SDValue ( )"
LLVM,NVPTX,1003,"If ExtType is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, then return SDValue()."
LLVM,NVPTX,1004,default: break;
LLVM,NVPTX,1005,"</s>

Return Ret;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1006,"}

It looks like the code is performing some kind of division operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,1007,"""For each use of Num, create a new SDNode called U."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1008,"return SDValue ( N , B ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1009,"<NUM_LIT>

0"
LLVM,NVPTX,1010,The next statement is: SDValue LoadChain = NewLD.getValue(NumElts);
LLVM,NVPTX,1011,"The next statement would be:
""LD = NewLD ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1012,"}</s>

The next statement will return the data section for the target object file for the given GlobalObject, SectionKind, and TargetMachine."
LLVM,NVPTX,1013,"We cannot accurately predict the next statement without seeing more of the code. It is possible that there are additional lines of code after this snippet, or that this snippet is part of a larger code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1014,}
LLVM,NVPTX,1015,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the current state of the code and what kind of values are being compared or returned. It could be any valid statement following a conditional statement, or the code could end if this is the final statement in a function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1016,"}

<SYM_LIT>return ! UsePrecSqrtF32;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1017,"} 

exception.

There may be an exception thrown somewhere during this code execution."
LLVM,NVPTX,1018,There is no remaining code snippet to predict.
LLVM,NVPTX,1019,The next statement is likely to involve checking the value of the attribute "UnsafeFPMath" for the current function and returning true if it is present.
LLVM,NVPTX,1020,"return <EltVT, Off> ; }

The next statement will be a closing brace after the for-loop block ends."
LLVM,NVPTX,1021,ValueVTs . push_back ( <NUM_L
LLVM,NVPTX,1022,"}</s>

The next statement could be a return statement with the variable ""CalleeV"" as the return value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1023,Missing semicolon to end the statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1024,"Based on the code snippet, the next statement might be <return>); or a similar statement that closes the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1025,This code will return the result of the TargetLoweringBase::getPreferredVectorAction function with the input parameter VT.
LLVM,NVPTX,1026,The next statement of this code snippet is an "else" statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1027,"if ( VTs.size() > InsIdx)
continue;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1028,"return LowerFROUND64 ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1029,"SDValue RoundedA = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, SL, VT, IsLarge, A, RoundedA);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1030,"<NUM_LIT> = <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT> ;
SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(""frinti"", SL, VT, AbsA) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1031,"The next statement is likely to involve using the nodes created in the previous lines to perform some kind of operation on a variable or value. This could involve adding, subtracting, multiplying, or dividing the nodes together, or using them to update the value of a variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1032,"auto PtrVT = getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout(), GAN->getAddressSpace());

// This statement creates a variable ""PtrVT"" that is assigned the value returned from the function call ""getPointerTy"", passing in the result of calling ""getDataLayout"" on the variable ""DAG"" and the result of calling ""getAddressSpace"" on the variable ""GAN""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1033,"return DAG.getNode( ISD::Constant, dl, PtrVT, Op );"
LLVM,NVPTX,1034,"SDValue Chain = Load -> getChain ( ) ; </s>

return DAG.getNode(ISD::LOAD, SDLoc(Op), MVT::i32, Chain, Load->getBasePtr());"
LLVM,NVPTX,1035,"If the value type of Op is not a string literal, the code snippet will return DAG.getMergeValues(Ops, SDLoc(Op)) after expanding the alignment of the load."
LLVM,NVPTX,1036,"The next statement would likely be a ""default"" statement or an ending statement, signifying the end of the switch-case block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1037,"Op = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default <STR_LIT> : llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ; } }

Check if the last element of the StoreOperands vector is the only element, and if so, push it onto the Op vector and break out of the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1038,"The next statement is:
Chain = DAG.getNode(Op, dl, MVT::Other, StoreOperands);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1039,"if (VT == <STR_LIT>) return LowerSTOREi8(Op, DAG);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1040,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1041,"The next statement will be:
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1042,return "The constructor for TargetObjectFile has been completed and the object has been instantiated.";
LLVM,NVPTX,1043,"</ s>

The next statement could be a closing curly brace(}) to end the function or another line of code within the function's scope."
LLVM,NVPTX,1044,return F && TO.AllowFMA;
LLVM,NVPTX,1045,"return false ; }

else {
  return true;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1046,We cannot accurately predict the next statement without more context or knowledge of the programming language being used.
LLVM,NVPTX,1047,"The next statement will likely be a closing bracket, marking the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1048,return !(CI->getSExtValue() > std::numeric_limits<int>::max());
LLVM,NVPTX,1049,"if ( Offsets ) Offsets -> push_back ( Off ) ; }

The next statement would be an if statement, checking if the current VT is a vector or not. If it is a vector, a for loop would be executed to push the vector elements into ValueVTs and Offsets if it exists. If it is not a vector, the current VT would be pushed into ValueVTs and Offsets if it exists."
LLVM,NVPTX,1050,"}
return CalleeV;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1051,"return C_Register ; } } return C_RegisterClass

return C_RegisterClass"
LLVM,NVPTX,1052,return ParamStr;
LLVM,NVPTX,1053,std::string ParamName = SavedStr->c_str();
LLVM,NVPTX,1054,"""return TargetLoweringBase::getPreferredVectorAction(VT);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1055,"if ( VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) != <NUM_LIT> && VT . getScalarType ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) {
    return TypeSplitVector ;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1056,<NUM_LIT>. O << <STR_LIT> << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; } else if ( isa < VectorType > ( Ty ) ) { O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; }
LLVM,NVPTX,1057,"The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, ending the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1058,This code snippet is checking if the value of TypeName is present in a container called specialTypes and returning a boolean value based on the result.
LLVM,NVPTX,1059,"The next statement will check if STy is equal to nullptr and if it is not, it will check if STy also does not have a literal type. If both conditions are met, it will set the variable TypeName to the name of STy, otherwise it will set it to <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,1060,"}

If none of the above cases are met, the method will return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,1061,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1062,"return true ; } }

The next statement will be another case statement with a <STR_LIT> value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1063,return;
LLVM,NVPTX,1064,"The next statement could be a statement to end the if condition, such as ""else return;"" or a statement to continue the code outside of the if condition."
LLVM,NVPTX,1065,"{ <STR_LIT> , Ops, nullPT}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1066,"SDValue Val = Node->getOperand(i);
Ops.push_back(Val);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1067,It is impossible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,1068,"else if ( Op . getValueType ( ) == MVT :: i8 ) return LowerLOADi8 ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1069,"Next, the code will create a new SDValue variable called ""newLD"" using the getLoad method of DAG and passing in the appropriate parameters such as the <STR_LIT> type, SDLoc variable dl, and various functions from the LoadSDNode class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1070,"The next statement will probably be to call a function on the SDValue Ops array. For example, it could be something like:

SDValue finalResult = DAG.combineNodes(Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1071,"Op1 = DAG .getNode( <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> , Op1) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1072,"Next, there will be a call to DAG.getNode() with inputs <STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, Op0, Op1, and Op2, which will return a SDValue named Select."
LLVM,NVPTX,1073,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, TrueVal, FalseVal);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1074,"}

SDValue Cmp2 = DAG . getSetCC ( dl , <STR_LIT> , SDValue , Hi , DAG . getConstant ( VTBits , dl , <STR_LIT> ) , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1075,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, Ops, <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1076,"""s isVector() is false, therefore no vector store can be lowered."
LLVM,NVPTX,1077,It is likely that the next statement will involve an instruction to store a vector to a location in memory.
LLVM,NVPTX,1078,"Tmp3 = DAG .getNode(<ADDR_SPACE>, dl, <ADDR_SPACE>, Tmp3);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1079,The next statement would be: return SDValue(Ops) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1080,"return SDValue(MemSD, <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1081,"</s>

<END OF STATEMENT> The function will return the result of calling the PerformADDCombineWithOperands function using the given operands and specified parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1082,return Result;
LLVM,NVPTX,1083,"break ; } }

return SDValue () ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1084,"In the next statement, the code will check if the value of Mask is not equal to a specific number (<NUM_LIT>) and if it is not, it will return a SDValue."
LLVM,NVPTX,1085,The statement after this code might check the value of MemVT for further processing.
LLVM,NVPTX,1086,"case <STR_LIT> : return PerformSELECTCombine ( N , DCI ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1087,"The next statement will most likely be another ""case"" statement or an ending statement for the function/block of code, possibly using the ""default"" or ""break"" keyword."
LLVM,NVPTX,1088,"}

""Otherwise, return the original node."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1089,"}

The next statement of this code snippet is:
 IntrinsicId = IsMax ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1090,It is difficult to predict the next statement without knowing the code in its entirety.
LLVM,NVPTX,1091,There is no next statement. The closing curly brace marks the end of the code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1092,"</s>

It is expected that the code will continue by appending the remaining operations of ""N"" to the vector ""OtherOps"" and proceed to the next part of the program."
LLVM,NVPTX,1093,SDValue Res = NewLD.getValue(i+1);
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1094,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,1095,The next statement could be a return statement that returns the selected section for the global value.
LLVM,NVPTX,1096,Return the result of the if statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1097,"DemotedVT = MulType ; }

return SDValue();"
LLVM,NVPTX,1098,delete static_cast < < ISA_LIT > Section * > ( DwarfRangesSection ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1099,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1100,This code snippet appears to define a function called "isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd" that takes in a constant reference to a MachineFunction and an unspecified EVT parameter. The function overrides something and returns a boolean value of true. The next statement is likely to close the function or continue with another function definition.
LLVM,NVPTX,1101,return "VT is a vector with X elements."
LLVM,NVPTX,1102,else return UnknownStatement;
LLVM,NVPTX,1103,"Possible, there is a function call or return of the type MVT that takes an argument of type EVT."
LLVM,NVPTX,1104,"If VT is a vector and EltVT is a string literal and NumElts modulus NUM_LIT equals NUM_LIT, then EltVT is set to the string literal, and then for each j from NUM_LIT to NumElts, EltVT is pushed to ValueVTs and the value Off + j * StoreSize(EltVT) is pushed to the Offsets vector if Offsets is not equal to nullptr."
LLVM,NVPTX,1105,"return bool

[STR_LIT] O << ""hold;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1106,"The next statement could be:

O << PTy->getElementType()->getCanonicalType()->getAsString() << "" * "";"
LLVM,NVPTX,1107,The next statement would likely be iterating through a for loop and performing some operation on each element.
LLVM,NVPTX,1108,"if ( ! first ) { O << <STR_LIT> ; } O << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT
O << ""\""error\"": -1, \""message\"": \""Expected a closing bracket at line <NUM_LIT>."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1109,O << " {\n";
LLVM,NVPTX,1110,"Possible prediction:
The next statement will check if the output of the function call to ""getDenormalMode"" on the ""MF"" object with the argument ""IEEEsingle"" from the ""APFloat"" class is equal to the ""PreserveSign"" enumeration within the ""DenormalMode"" class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1111,"<s>
else { return null; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1112,return MF . setDenormalMode ( APFloat :: IEEEdouble ( ) ) == DenormalMode :: FlushToZero ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1113,"""idx = idx + 1"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1114,"elems = cast < VectorType > ( ETy ) -> getNumElements ( ) ; if ( elems < <NUM_LIT> ) elems = <NUM_LIT> ; } O << elemtype << elems << <STR_LIT> ; }

This code snippet is computing and outputting various information about the types of variables stored in the current program."
LLVM,NVPTX,1115,- The code will return the result of the getRegForInlineAsmConstraint function from the TargetLowering class.
LLVM,NVPTX,1116,"There is no next statement, as the code snippet ends with the closing curly brace."
LLVM,NVPTX,1117,"None, the code snippet ends here."
LLVM,NVPTX,1118,The next statement will be "return true ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1119,"The next statement will be the end of the if statement and it will execute the return statement, either returning true or false based on the outcome of the if statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1120,The code will return false.
LLVM,NVPTX,1121,"If the length of the constraint string is greater than some number, the function will return."
LLVM,NVPTX,1122,"</s>

In this code snippet, the next statement would most likely be:

return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1123,"A node will be added to the debug location, the vector value type, and the vector number of elements."
LLVM,NVPTX,1124,"}
(1) NumSubElem stands for the number of sub-elements in vector VVT."
LLVM,NVPTX,1125,"}>

This code snippet is attempting to build a vector of SDValues called InVals, which contains paramSymbols and addresses."
LLVM,NVPTX,1126,"return DAG.getNode(LOAD, dl, getPointerTy(), Op);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1127,"case <STR_LIT> : return DAG . getNode ( <INITIAL> , SDLoc ( Op
): Error: Expected expression after 'Op'
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1128,"case <STR_LIT> : return LowerCONCAT_VECTORS ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1129,"In this code snippet, the next statement will likely involve a conditional statement using the ternary operator, with the condition being whether or not isABI is true. Depending on the value of isABI, the next statements will either use the string literal <STR_LIT> or another string literal as an argument for the DAG.getNode() function. Additionally, there will likely be another argument for the DAG.getNode() function using either a constant value or a variable, such as sizesofar or idx."
LLVM,NVPTX,1130,"DAG.getMergeValues(Ops, SDLoc(Op));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1131,"The next statement is likely to be ""return DAG.getMergeValues(Ops, SDLoc(Op)); } }"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1132,"if (VT == <INT_LIT> ) return LowerSTOREi32( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1133,F.getAttribute("StringLiteral").getValueAsBool();
LLVM,NVPTX,1134,if (F.getDebugLoc()) return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1135,else
LLVM,NVPTX,1136,"This code snippet seems to be processing the arguments passed into a function or method. It is looping through the arguments, checking their type and size, and then outputting information about each argument. Based on the previous statements, the next statement could possibly involve another loop or some sort of conditional code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1137,"O << <STR_LIT> << align << <NUM_LIT> ;

O << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1138,"}</s>

""The function will return a boolean value of 'true'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1139,The program will return the value "true".
LLVM,NVPTX,1140,std::cout << "The type is not a pointer or there is no context." << std::endl;
LLVM,NVPTX,1141,"if (PTy != nullptr) { 
  llvm::Type *containedType = PTy->getElementType(); 
  }

If PTy is not equal to nullptr, then the next statement will declare a new variable ""containedType"" of type ""llvm::Type"" and assign it the value returned by the ""getElementType()"" method of the ""PointerType"" class, passing in the ""Ty"" variable as an argument."
LLVM,NVPTX,1142,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1143,"case <NUM_LIT> : Op = <STR_LIT> ; break ; case <NUM_LIT> : Op = <STR_LIT> ; break ; default : llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> )
The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1144,The current statement of this code snippet is "StoreOperands.clear();". The next statement will likely be a return statement that returns a new node to the DAG.
LLVM,NVPTX,1145,SDValue tempVal = SDValue();
LLVM,NVPTX,1146,"SDValue ( ) ; }

SDValue()"
LLVM,NVPTX,1147,"The next statement is:

SmallVector < SDValue , <NUM_LIT> > OtherOps ( N -> op_begin ( ) , N -> op_end ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1148,"} } }

It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the value of ""OptSize"" and whether or not the condition in the last ""if"" statement will be met."
LLVM,NVPTX,1149,return TempVTs[i];
LLVM,NVPTX,1150,DirectCallee = CalleeV
LLVM,NVPTX,1151,The next statement is "if ( isa < Function > ( CalleeV ) ) DirectCallee = CalleeV ; } }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1152,The next statement will be "return C_RegisterClass;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1153,This code snippet does not contain any further statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,1154,The next statement should return a scalar shift amount type using the left hand side event type.
LLVM,NVPTX,1155,"</s>

< s > return EVT :: getVectorVT ( Ctx , <STR_LIT> , VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) + 1 ) ; </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1156,"else return EVT::getVectorVT(Ctx, <STR_LIT>, VT.getScalarType());"
LLVM,NVPTX,1157,if (STy && STy->isOpaque()) return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1158,(Not enough information to accurately predict the next statement)
LLVM,NVPTX,1159,The next statement that will be predicted is "return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1160,"return true ; } }

 The next statement would be ""return false;"" because the if statement did not match any of the specific opcodes."
LLVM,NVPTX,1161,return Ops;
LLVM,NVPTX,1162,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet without additional context. The code could continue with additional operations using the variable Op and the DAG object, or it could declare new variables and perform different operations."
LLVM,NVPTX,1163,"return DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(GV, dl, getPointerTy());"
LLVM,NVPTX,1164,"else if ( TheStoreType == MVT :: <STR_LIT> ) { TmpVal = DAG . getNode ( ISD :: ZERO_EXTEND , dl , <STR_LIT> , TmpVal ) ; } else if ( TheStoreType == MVT :: <STR_LIT> ) { TmpVal = DAG . getNode ( ISD :: ZERO_EXTEND , dl , <STR_LIT> , TmpVal ) ; TheStoreType = MVT :: <STR_LIT> ; } TmpVal = <STR_LIT> ; Ops . push_back ( TmpVal ) ; Offsets ."
LLVM,NVPTX,1165,"return DAG . getMergeValues ( Ops , dl ) ; }

The next statement is:
return DAG . getMergeValues ( Ops , dl ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1166,"SDValue Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, ShOpHi, ExtraShAmt);
SDValue TrueVal = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, Tmp2, Tmp3);
SDValue Cmp = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, MVT::i1, DAG.getConstant<STR_LIT(BasicBlock *BB = DAG.getMachineFunction().getPFIX<NUM_LIT>())>TrueVal,Cmp,FalseVal);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1167,"return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , dl , VT , ShOpLo , ShOpHi , RevShAmt ) ; }

The next statement is ""unsigned Opc = ( Op . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;"" which assigns a value to the variable Opc based on the result of a conditional statement using the getOpcode() function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1168,"Hi

The next statement is:
SDValue Lo = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShOpHi, ShAmt);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1169,"return SDValue ( ) ;
The next statement would be: 
SDValue Op = N->getOperand(i);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1170,"The next statement would be: 
Results.push_back(DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, NewLD.getValue(<NUM_LIT>)));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1171,"SDValue Res = NewLD.getValue(i); if (NeedTrunc) Res = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ResVT.getVectorElementType(), Res); ScalarRes.push_back(Res);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1172,"}>

The code snippet will check for the presence of a ConstantSDNode in the right-hand side operand, and if found, it will swap the left and right-hand side operands."
LLVM,NVPTX,1173,"return DCI.DAG.getNode(Opc, SDLoc(N), MulType, TruncLHS, TruncRHS);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1174,"</s>

mallocCode ;

mallocCode ; freeHeap ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1175,"for(auto * CU : CUs)

delete DwarfARangesSection;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1176,"The next statement could potentially be a print statement that outputs the size and type of the variable, as well as the alignment if it is a pointer type. It could also continue to the next iteration of the loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1177,"""assert((getValueType(DL, Ty) == Outs[OIdx].VT || (getValueType(DL, Ty) == MVT::iPTR) && DL.getPointerTypeSizeInBits(Ty) == MVT::iPTR && Outputs[OIdx].VT == MVT::iPTR), ""Inconsistent use of valueType and machineValueType"");"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1178,There is no next statement. The code snippet ends with the final semi-colon.
LLVM,NVPTX,1179,"return NULL

Possible answer: The next statement will be the end of the code snippet and will return NULL."
LLVM,NVPTX,1180,"NeedTrunc = true ; }

The next statement will likely check the size of EltVT against a predefined NUM_LIT value to determine if truncation is necessary."
LLVM,NVPTX,1181,"SmallVector<SDValue, i> ScalarRes;

Explanation: This statement initializes a new SmallVector called ScalarRes with a size of i, which was previously defined as the number of elements in the ResVT vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,1182,"</sAnswer: 
There is no more code to be executed and the function will now end."
LLVM,NVPTX,1183,It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the context and purpose of the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1184,"It is not possible to predict without additional context. The next statement could be a return value, a conditional statement, or a function call."
LLVM,NVPTX,1185,"}

A statement that pushes the Off in the else clause."
LLVM,NVPTX,1186,"} else { <C-
52
> VT ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1187,"The next statement is: 
assert(llvm::getAlign(*(CS->getCalledFunction()), Idx, align));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1188,"} }

""else O << <STR_LIT> << uniqueCallSite << <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1189,"O << <STR_LIT> ; assert ( <STR_LIT> ) ; }

Type * Ty = Args [ i ] . Ty"
LLVM,NVPTX,1190,"return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , & <STR_LIT> ) ;

case 't' : return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , & <STR_LIT> ) ;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1191,"return <STR_LIT> ;


Next, there will be a closing bracket or a break statement to exit the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1192,"Info . writeMem = true ; Info . align = <NUM_LIT> ; return true ; } 
The code will possibly return the value for the next statement of IntrinsicInfo, which may be either true or false, depending on the case statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1193,"return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , dl , EltVT , SubOp , DAG . getIntPtrConstant ( j ) )"
LLVM,NVPTX,1194,The next statement is likely to be another assertion statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1195,The next statement would be "return result;".
LLVM,NVPTX,1196,The next statement would be "break;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1197,"</s>

return LowerLOAD ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1198,"else if ( Next i have a switch statement

No, the next statement is not a switch statement. It is a for loop that adds a new element to the ""Ops"" vector for each iteration."
LLVM,NVPTX,1199,SDValue NewSt
LLVM,NVPTX,1200,"}


The code snippet will assign the value of the element at index <NUM_LIT> of the NewLD variable to the Res variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1201,"case <NUM_LIT>: Opcode = <STR_LIT>; EVT ListVTs[] = { EltVT, EltVT, <STR_LIT> }; LdResVTs = DAG.getVTList(ListVTs, <NUM_LIT>); break;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1202,The code snippet is creating a new LoadSDNode using the extension type from the original LoadSDNode.
LLVM,NVPTX,1203,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the code that follows this snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1204,Throw an error since there is no return statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1205,return LHSTy.getScalarType().getScalarShiftAmountTy();
LLVM,NVPTX,1206,"}

return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1207,"Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

for (unsigned i = 0; i < numElems; ++i) { ... }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1208,"SDNode *SelectNode = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Cmp, TrueVal, FalseVal, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1209,"SDValue Hi = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShOpHi, ShAmt);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1210,"The next statement would likely be a return statement, as the code block given is reaching its conclusion."
LLVM,NVPTX,1211,"}

The next statement will check if the alignment of MemSD is less than the preferred alignment."
LLVM,NVPTX,1212,"return DAG.getNode(<OPCODE>, SDLoc(N), VT, N0.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), N0.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), N1);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1213,"The next statement will likely contain a conditional expression, possibly involving another function call."
LLVM,NVPTX,1214,"}

The code will return the result of the PerformADDCombine function when the opcode is either <STR_LIT> or <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,1215,SDValue LoadChain = NewLD.getValue(NumElts+1);
LLVM,NVPTX,1216,"O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT>
Lines 47~54: O << ""align "" << align << "" align "" ; O << ""store %a, "" ; O << (*this->getValueType(ETy)).getEVTString().str() << sz << "" byte)
Lines 55~62: if ( OIdx == 0 ) O << ""\n""; O << ""store "" << ""OIdx""; O << "", ""; O << ""candle index)"" ; O << ""store %c, "" ; O << (*this->getValueType(ETy"
LLVM,NVPTX,1217,"return <STR_LIT>

The next statement would likely be an ending statement, such as a ""break"" statement to end the switch statement."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1191,"return <STR_LIT> ;


The next statement will most likely be another case statement or the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1192,"Info . writeMem = true ; Info . align = <NUM_LIT> ; return true ; }

The next statement of this code snippet is likely part of a larger code block and cannot be accurately predicted without the context of the surrounding code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1193,Push the result of DAG.getNode() onto the Ops vector.
LLVM,NVPTX,1194,"The next statement of this code snippet is:

SDValue result = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, <STR_LIT>, newLD);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1195,"This code snippet is defining a function called LowerLOADi1, which takes in two parameters: Op (of type SDValue) and DAG (of type SelectionDAG). It then declares a new variable Node which is set to the value of Op's node. The function then casts that node to be a LoadSDNode and the result is stored in a variable called LD. A new variable dl is created of type SDLoc, which is initialized with the value of Node. An assertion is made to check that LD's extension type is equal to a string literal. Another assertion is made to check that Node's value type is equal"
LLVM,NVPTX,1196,The next statement of this code snippet could be a comment or another case statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1197,"The next statement could be: case <STR_LIT>: return LowerEXTRACT_SUBVECTOR(Op, DAG);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1198,"The statement is: SmallVector < SDValue , <NUM_LIT> > Ops ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1199,return NewSt ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1200,"}

The next statement is: NeedTrunc = true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1201,"LdResVTs = DAG.getVTList(ListVTs, <NUM_LIT>);
OtherOps.push_back(SDValue(<STR_LIT>, 0));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1202,">

getMemIntrinsicNode"
LLVM,NVPTX,1203,"</s>

<
/s> }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1204,return MVT::i32;
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1205,The next statement is most likely a return statement that returns a virtual MVT type indicating the scalar shift amount for the given EVT type.
LLVM,NVPTX,1206,"}

""The next statement is a conditional statement checking if VT is a vector, followed by a return statement for the tuple of '<STR_LIT>' and the number of elements in the vector. If VT is not a vector, there will be a return statement for '<STR_LIT>'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1207,"Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

} // End of loop over Outs"
LLVM,NVPTX,1208,"</s>

} else if (Res.getOpcode() == ISD::ZERO_EXTEND) {"
LLVM,NVPTX,1209,"}

The next statement would be:
SDValue Ops[2] = {Lo, Hi};"
LLVM,NVPTX,1210,The next statement is "return NewSt ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1211,"}


case <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1212,The code will return a new SDValue with the contents of <STR_LIT> and the operands from the previous lines.
LLVM,NVPTX,1213,"None of the above cases match, so the code will default to returning an empty SDValue."
LLVM,NVPTX,1214,"</s>

I cannot accurately predict the next statement as this code snippet is incomplete."
LLVM,NVPTX,1215,"The code snippet creates a new small vector, OtherOps, with a predetermined number of elements. Then, the code creates a loop that iterates through a specific number of operands, adding them to the OtherOps vector. The next statement will use the LLVM DAG to create a new memory intrinsic node, using the values from the OtherOps vector as operands."
LLVM,NVPTX,1216,"O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> 

 FO_idx.O.<STR_LIT> + sz;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1217,"return <STR_LIT> ;
It is difficult to predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet and understanding its purpose. However, based on the patterns shown in the snippet, it is possible that the next statement will be a case statement with a <STR_LIT> value. It could also potentially be another return statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1218,"redict: O << <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement will output the value of ""sz"" and add the string ""uint"" to the end of the output."
LLVM,NVPTX,1219,"""The total size is calculated and output along with the return alignment."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1220,It is impossible to predict the next statement as this code snippet is incomplete. It is missing context and does not contain any further information to indicate the next step in the code. It may depend on the purpose or goal of the code and the specific programming language being used.
LLVM,NVPTX,1221,"</s>

The next statement could be the beginning of a conditional statement, for example:

if (sizesofar <= 10) {
  // Code block
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1222,theValType is an integer type and the loop will only iterate once.
LLVM,NVPTX,1223,O << " " << getName(*F.getName().str() << uniqueCallSite << " " ; if ( outgoingType -> getTypeID () == Type :: VoidTyID ) { O << " ; } else { O << " return " ; if ( outgoingType -> isFloatingPointTy () || ( outgoingType -> isIntegerTy () && ! outgoingType -> isIntegerTy (4) ) ) { unsigned size = 4 ; if ( auto * ITy = dyn_cast < IntegerType > ( outgoingType ) ) { size = ITy -> getBitWidth () ; } else { assert ( outgoingType ->
LLVM,NVPTX,1224,"The next statement is:
<STR_LIT> = NumElts"
LLVM,NVPTX,1225,"return SDValue ( ) ; }
It is not possible to determine the next statement without more context. The code snippet does not include any variables or information about what the switch statement is switching on."
LLVM,NVPTX,1226,"return LowerSTORE ( Op , DAG ) ;

if (ValVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy == MVT::Other) { return LowerSTORE(Op, DAG); }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1227,"The next statement is the case statement <STR_LIT>: return PerformMODCombine (N, DCI, OptLevel);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1228,"</s

}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1229,"opIsLive = true ; break ; } }

The next statement is a for-loop that checks for any uses of the 'right' SDNode after the current 'orderNo'."
LLVM,NVPTX,1230,"}

return PerformSUBCombine(N, DCI, nvptxSubtarget, OptLevel);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1231,"The next statement is:

false"
LLVM,NVPTX,1232,"""If the pointer type is not found, return false."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1233,"if ( isKernel ) ErrorMessagePrediction

This code snippet is likely part of a compiler or runtime system for a programming language. It appears to be generating code for passing function parameters and creating a stack object. The next statement could be related to handling errors or exceptions in the generated code. Possible options could include setting a return value or propagating an error to be handled by the calling function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1234,"SDValue newResult = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1235,"The next statement is:

// Create new load and assign it to ""newLD"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1236,"The next statement could be:
case <STR_LIT> : return LowerVSELECT(Op, DAG);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1237,"""Update the alignment and volatility information for the store operation."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1238,"} if ( DirectCallee ) { return <NUM_LIT> ;

This code snippet does not make sense as it is incomplete and some variables are redeclared. A possible prediction could be that the next statement is:
return <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1239,"The next statement returns the alignment value, either from the getAlign function or the getFunctionParamOptimizedAlign function, or it returns the ABI type alignment from the DL variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1240,This snippet calculates the alignment for a given ABIType.
LLVM,NVPTX,1241,"based on the context and syntax of the code snippet, the next statement would likely be assigning a value to the constant ABITypeAlign using the function DL.getABITypeAlign(ArgTy).value()."
LLVM,NVPTX,1242,"""O << '\\01' ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1243,"The code snippet executes a switch statement to determine which operation to perform on the vector elements, based on the number of elements being stored. This operation is then used to create a memory intrinsic node using the data and values from the previous actions in the code snippet. The intrinsic node is then stored in the Chain variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1244,else return SDValue();
LLVM,NVPTX,1245,"""return SDValue(N)"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1246,O << "fail";
LLVM,NVPTX,1247,"""If none of the previous if statements are fulfilled, return true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1248,"This code snippet sets multiple operation and load/store actions and then runs a loop to set custom operation actions for specific types. The next statement in this snippet would likely continue to set custom operation actions for specific types, followed by setting legal and expand actions for more types."
LLVM,NVPTX,1249,Possible next statement: delete DwarfRangesSection;
LLVM,NVPTX,1250,"case <NUM_LIT>

32 or 64"
LLVM,NVPTX,1251,"O << <STR_LIT> << Outs [ OIdx ] . Flags . getByValSize ( ) << <STR_LIT>;

""This statement is a continuation of the for loop, within the body of the loop. It checks the type of the current argument at index 'i' and performs certain actions based on the type. Specifically, if the type is an aggregate type, vector type, or integer type, it calculates the alignment and size, and updates the OIdx variable accordingly. If the type is not one of these types, it ensures that the value type of the type is equal to the value type in the Outs"
LLVM,NVPTX,1252,"The next statement could be:
if (PTy->getElementType()->isIntegerTy()) { 
    ... 
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1253,if ( ! STy ) return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1254,"if ( isa < STR_LIT > ( VTs [ j ] , EVT ) ) { DAG . SelectNodeTo ( <STR_LIT> , VecVT . getVectorElementType ( ) , <STR_LIT> . impl , <STR_LIT> , P , P . getValueType ( ) ) ; } } } }

SDValue Ptr = DAG.getNode(64, dl, PtrVT, Ptr1, DAG.getConstant(Offset, dl, PtrVT));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1255,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the input or context of the code snippet. It appears to be a long list of case statements, but the values being returned will depend on the specific input or value being evaluated in the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1256,"case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> :

The next statement would be ""case <STR_LIT>:"" followed by several more cases with various <STR_LIT> values, all with the same block of code underneath."
LLVM,NVPTX,1257,"if ( numElems > <NUM_LIT> ) { if ( llvm :: all_of ( SmallVectorImpl ( ValVTs ) . slice ( SizeSoFar , numElems ) , [ ] ( EVT E ) { return E == <STR_LIT> ; } ) ) { SmallVector < SDValue , <NUM_LIT> > ShuffleVec ; for ( unsigned j = <NUM_LIT> ; j < numElems ; ++ j ) { for ( unsigned k = <NUM_LIT> ; k < THE ValType . getVectorNumElements ( ) ; ++ k ) ShuffleVec . push_back"
LLVM,NVPTX,1258,TRUE
LLVM,NVPTX,1259,"We can't accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the code following this snippet, which is not provided. It is possible that there may be another case statement after this, or the code may move on to a different section of the program."
LLVM,NVPTX,1260,"sizesofar += tmpvt . getStoreSizeInBits ( ) ; } }

}if (isABI) { SDValue Arg = getParamSymbol(DAG, idx, getPointerTy()); SDValue p = DAG.getNode(STR_LIT, dl, ObjectVT, Arg); if (p.getNode()) DAG.AssignOrdering(p.getNode(), idx + NUM_LIT); if (isKernel) InVals.push_back(p); else { SDValue p2 = DAG.getNode(STR_LIT, dl, ObjectVT, DAG.getConstant(STR_LIT, STR_LIT), p); InVals.push_back(p2);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1261,"The next statement is likely to involve assigning a value to the ""newLD"" variable using the DAG function, with various arguments passed in."
LLVM,NVPTX,1262,"The code snippet creates an SDValue called ExtVal using the getNode() function with parameters <STR_LIT>, DL, EltVT, and Val. Then, if NeedExt is true, ExtVal is reassigned using the getNode() function with parameters <STR_LIT>, DL, and <STR_LIT>, and is pushed to the Ops vector. Next, a for loop is initiated with i equal to <NUM_LIT> and e equal to N->getNumOperands(), and each operand is pushed to the Ops vector. Then, N is cast to a MemSDNode and a new SDValue called NewSt is"
LLVM,NVPTX,1263,"break ; } SDValue Ld = DAG . getNode ( Opcode , DL , LdResVTs . get <NUM_LIT> ( ) , Results . get <NUM_LIT> ( ) , Results . get <NUM_LIT> ( ) ) ; Results . push_back ( Ld ) ; return ; } 

The next statement will be: ""Results.push_back(Ld)""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1264,"case <STR_LIT> : </s>

break;
case <NUM_LIT>:
  break;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1265,The next statement would be the ending curly bracket for the previous switch statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1266,"ScalarRes . push_back ( Res ) ; }

Create a small vector of scalar values from the result of the load intrinsic."
LLVM,NVPTX,1267,break;
LLVM,NVPTX,1268,"} </s>

Depending on the value of Constraint[<NUM_LIT>], the code will either return std::make_pair(<NUM_LIT>, &<STR_LIT>) or skip to the next case."
LLVM,NVPTX,1269,"There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It is likely that there will be more case statements and returns for different string literals, but it is impossible to know the specific values without the rest of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1270,"}

The next statement would likely be another ""case"" statement for another operation or command that the code is handling."
LLVM,NVPTX,1271,The next statement would be "default:"
LLVM,NVPTX,1272,"I'm sorry, there is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It appears to be missing key elements such as variable names or conditionals."
LLVM,NVPTX,1273,"InVals . push_back ( p ) ; }

InVals.push_back(DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, ObjectVT, Arg));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1274,"SDValue p = DAG . getCopyToReg ( Root , dl , ArgGroup , SDValue ( & Inputs [ idx ] , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; p . getNode ( ) -> setIROrder ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; InVals . push_back ( p ) ; } 

The code will continue to the next iteration of the for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1275,"The next statement of this code snippet would be:

DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(Node, Ops);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1276,">

The next statement of this code snippet is:

SDValue newResult = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, <STR_LIT>, result);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1277,"The next statement would be: ""DAG.ReplaceAllUsesWith(SrcOp, Result);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1278,The next statement is "return Result;".
LLVM,NVPTX,1279,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Legal ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1280,The next statement will be a conditional statement using the 'if' keyword.
LLVM,NVPTX,1281,"O << <STR_LIT> << sz 

 O << <STR_LIT> << align << <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1282,"The next statement will return the result of the conditional statement, where FtzEnabled will be compared with the return value of MF.getDenormalMode(APFloat::IEEEsingle()).Output == DenormalMode::PreserveSign."
LLVM,NVPTX,1283,"Next, it looks like the code snippet is checking if a variable called FtzEnabled is set to true or false and then returning that value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1284,O << <STR_LIT> << retAlign << <STR_LIT> << getDataLayout() -> getTypeAllocSize(retTy) << <STR_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,1285,"return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT>

case 'm' : return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , & <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1286,The next statement would be to return the variable "NewSt".
LLVM,NVPTX,1287,"SDValue NewSD = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, ResVT, LoadChain, BuildVec);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1288,"if ( AddSub ) ScalarRes . push_back ( DAG . getNode ( Opcode , DL , VTList , OtherOpsw , Res ) ) ;

SDValue Res = NewLD.getValue(i);
if (NeedTrunc) Res = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ResVT.getVectorElementType(), Res);
if (AddSub) ScalarRes.push_back( DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, VTList, OtherOpsw, Res));

SDValue Res = NewLD.getValue(i);
if (NeedTrunc) Res = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ResVT.getVectorElementType(), Res);
if (Add"
LLVM,NVPTX,1289,"The next statement is:

return Chain;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1290,"break ;

default: return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1291,1. Return the node that was just created
LLVM,NVPTX,1292,"SDValue ResChain = DAG.getUNDEF(ValVT);
DTL(ValueVT);
VALUtil();
DAG.getStore(ResChain, DL, Op.getOperand(1), Op.getOperand(0), Align, false,Opcode);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1293,"break ;
It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the program's context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1294,"The code will then add a new element to the ""OtherOps"" vector using the ""getIntPtrConstant"" function, passing in the extension type of the ""LD"" LoadSDNode and the DL object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1295,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information about the context and purpose of the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1296,"The next statement will be to return a node from the SelectionDAG using the provided debug location, the value type of the Node, and the list of operations that were pushed onto the Ops vector, and the size of the Ops vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,1297,<NUM_LIT + 1>;
LLVM,NVPTX,1298,"The next statement is: ""Chains.push_back(DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, <STR_LIT>, &theChains[1], theChains.size()));"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1299,assert (newLD.getNode()->getValueType(1) == MVT::i32);
LLVM,NVPTX,1300,"The next statement will check if the value type is a vector and create a new node with the string literal as its label, the debug location, the vector's element type, the temporary value, and the index as its operands, assigning it to 'tmpval'. It will then create a new node with the string literal as its label and the debug location, a specific string literal depending on the value of 'isABI', the current position or size, and the temporary value as its operands, assigning it to 'Chain'."
LLVM,NVPTX,1301,"}

The next statement is:

SDValue ChainEnd = DAG.getNode(isABI ? ISD::CALLSEQ_START : ISD::CALLSEQ_END, dl, MVT::Other, Chain, DAG.getConstant(isABI ? sizesofar : idx, MVT::i32));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1302,unsigned PointerSize = ST -> getPointerSize ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1303,"The next statement will be a return statement, returning the variable 'NewSt'."
LLVM,NVPTX,1304,Results.push_back(NewLD.getValue(<NUM_LIT>));
LLVM,NVPTX,1305,"underspecified

The next statement will likely be an if/else statement, as indicated by the ""if (ResVT. isSimple()"" condition in the previous line. However, the specific contents of the statement cannot be determined without more context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1306,"They will create a for loop to iterate over the remaining elements of the SmallVector, pushing them onto the OtherOps vector. They will then cast N to a LoadSDNode and push the extension type onto the OtherOps vector. They will then use the values in OtherOps to create a new memory intrinsic node with the specified Opcode, DL, load result VTs, number of operands, memory VT, and memory operand. They will also create a SmallVector for the scalar results. Finally, they will iterate over the remaining elements of NumElts and get the values from NewLD."
LLVM,NVPTX,1307,The next statement will likely involve returning the value of the "Op" variable.
LLVM,NVPTX,1308,The next statement would most likely be "O << sz << " with the value of "sz" being the one previously assigned in the if statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1309,"The next statement will probably involve setting an operation action for a specific type, either as Legal or Expand."
LLVM,NVPTX,1310,The next statement is: "O << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT> << sz << <STR_LIT> ; O << <STR_LIT> ; continue ; "
LLVM,NVPTX,1311,"sz = DL . getPointerTypeSize ( Ty ) ; if ( sz < <NUM_LIT> ) sz = <NUM_LIT> ; } else if ( Ty -> isVoidTy ( <STR_LIT> ) ) sz = <NUM_LIT> ;</s>

else { sz = DL.getABITypeSizeInBits(Ty); }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1312,The next possible statement could be setting the operation action for <INT_LIT> to Legal.
LLVM,NVPTX,1313,"} <INS_LIT>
SDValue Chain = DAG.getNode(ISD::EntryToken, dl, ObjectVT);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1314,next statement: return 0;
LLVM,NVPTX,1315,"}</s>

 ""The function will return a statement delivering the remainder of a division operation."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1316,The next statement is `std::string updated_name = *name;`.
LLVM,NVPTX,1317,"</s>

The next statement would be a closing curly brace."
LLVM,NVPTX,1318,"I don't know

 if (VT == MVT::i16) {
 return MVT::i32;
 }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1319,"The next statement is likely to be the closing curly brace, marking the end of the function or code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1320,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the context and logic of the code. It could be a conditional statement, a function call, or simply the end of the code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1321,"}

True"
LLVM,NVPTX,1322,"The next statement will check if the StructType, STy, is not NULL and is not a literal using the getName function, and if so, assign its name to the string variable TypeName."
LLVM,NVPTX,1323,further processing can be performed on the element type
LLVM,NVPTX,1324,The next statement could be "end of function or block".
LLVM,NVPTX,1325,"// Create IRBuilder to add instructions to the end of OrigBB
Builder.SetInsertPoint(OrigBB->getTerminator());"
LLVM,NVPTX,1326,LoopBuilder.CreateBr(LoopBB);
LLVM,NVPTX,1327,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1328,"}</s>

""The function will return a string literal."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1329,AU.addRequired<MemoryDependenceWrapperPass>();
LLVM,NVPTX,1330,AU .addPreserved < LVI > ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1331,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1332,">

The code will iterate through the AggrLoads and perform a memory copy before erasing the store instruction and load instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1333,"}

Check whether the two sets of processes are equal"
LLVM,NVPTX,1334,"<DEC_STMT> ;) AggrLoads = MemTransferOffsets :: MemIntrinsicInfo ( ( ) , nullptr);}}

AggrLoads.push_back(LI);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1335,"} } }</NUM_LIT>

The next statement would be: 

for (unsigned i = 0, e = MaxAggrCopySize -1; i != e; ++i)"
LLVM,NVPTX,1336,"expandMemSetAsLoop ( Memset ) ; }

This code snippet will iterate through the function to search for any LoadInst or MemIntrinsic instructions. If a LoadInst is found, it will check if it has one use and if its type store size is less than a max value. If a StoreInst is found as a user of the LoadInst, it will be pushed to AggrLoads. If a MemIntrinsic is found, it will check if its length is greater than a max value, and if so, the instruction will be pushed to MemCalls. After iterating through the function, if the sizes of Ag"
LLVM,NVPTX,1337,"loopBB -> getTerminator()->addIncoming(newind, loopBB);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1338,"""Loop through each iteration until the condition is met and create a store using the value obtained from the source address and store it in the destination address."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1339,It is impossible to predict the next statement without more information about the context and variables involved.
LLVM,NVPTX,1340,"MemCpyInst * memcpy = aggrMemcpys [ i ] ;

return aggrMemcpys[i+1] | The next statement would be ""MemSetInst * memsetintr = dyn_cast < MemSetInst > ( II );""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1341,"The next statement could potentially be another line starting with IRBuilder < >, which may perform another operation on the loopBB or on the ind variable. However, without more context or information on the variables and their purpose, it is difficult to predict the exact statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1342,"if ( len_int -> getZExtValue ( ) >= MaxAggrCopySize ) { aggrMemsets . push_back ( memsetintr ) ; } } 
else
if
( isa < CallInst > ( I ) ) {

The next statement is likely going to use the ""isa"" method to check if the current instruction is a ""CallInst""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1343,builder.CreateBr(loopBB);
LLVM,NVPTX,1344,"loop . CreateCondBr ( ind , loopBB , loopBB ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1345,loop.CreateBr(contBB);
LLVM,NVPTX,1346,"for ( MemSetInst * memsetinst : aggrMemsets ) { Value * len = memsetinst -> getLength ( ) ; Value * val = memsetinst -> getValue ( ) ; convertMemSetToLoop ( memsetinst , memsetinst -> getDest ( ) , len , val , Context , F ) ; memsetinst -> eraseFromParent ( ) ; } return true ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1347,"predict:

The next statement could be a closing brace or another condition check, such as ""if (aggrLoads.size() == <NUM_LIT> + 1)""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1348,"if ( ( load -> getPointerOperand ( ) != dstAddr ) || ( store -> getPointerOperand ( ) != srcAddr ) ) continue ; if ( ( srcAddr -> <s> )

load == store->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)) continue;

This statement is part of a loop. It checks if the source address of the load instruction matches the destination address of the store instruction, and if it does, the loop continues."
LLVM,NVPTX,1349,The next statement is "for (LoadInst *LI : AggrLoads) {"
LLVM,NVPTX,1350,"} }

// Code snippet does not contain any additional statements to predict"
LLVM,NVPTX,1351,"<s>

The code snippet will continue by checking if the current memory call is a memcpy or memmove instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1352,"This code snippet continues with two for loops that iterate through the elements of the AggrLoads and MemCalls vectors, calling different functions based on the type of instruction in each element. After these loops, there is another if statement that checks the size of the AggrLoads and MemCalls vectors. If the size is equal to the <NUM_LIT> constant, the function returns false. After that, there are three more for loops that call different functions for each of the elements in the AggrLoads and MemCalls vectors. Finally, each MemCall instruction is erased from its parent before the function ends."
LLVM,NVPTX,1353,The next statement will add a new incoming value to the variable "ind" using the CreateAdd function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1354,"The code will add a new if statement to the loopBB basic block, based on the result of an unsigned comparison between newind and len. If the comparison returns true, the loop will continue to loopBB, otherwise it will exit to newBB."
LLVM,NVPTX,1355,"loop.Add(newind, ConstantInt::get(indType, 1));"
LLVM,NVPTX,1356,Create a conditional branch statement that will either iterate the loop again or move on to the next basic block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1357,The code snippet creates a conditional branch instruction at the end of the loop.
LLVM,NVPTX,1358,"LoopBuilder.CreateStore(SetValue, DstAddr) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1359,"</s> 

Nothing is returned, as there is no code following the <s> tag."
LLVM,NVPTX,1360,"""return the value of <STR_LIT> as the pass name"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1361,"I'm sorry, there is no next statement as the code snippet provided is incomplete. Can you please provide the full code?"
LLVM,NVPTX,1362,"//</s>

{s} LowerAggrCopies(void) : FunctionPass{ //</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1363,This code snippet defines a function pass called "LowerAggrCopies" with the specified ID.
LLVM,NVPTX,1364,"<s>}

return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1365,"MemCall -> setLength ( ConstantInt :: get ( <BOOL_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;

The code is checking for load instructions with a single use, a type size smaller than a maximum value, and uses a store instruction with an operand different than itself. If the number of such load instructions and memory calls is equal to a certain value, the function returns false. Otherwise, a copy loop is created and the store and load instructions are erased. Finally, the length of the memory call is set to a constant integer value depending on a boolean value and a numerical value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1366,"}

The next statement will create a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>LowerAlloca class and return it as a BasicBlockPass pointer."
LLVM,NVPTX,1367,"return new <ISA_LIT>LowerAllocaPass();
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1368,"<s> This code snippet defines a class called LowerAlloca that inherits from the BasicBlockPass class and takes in the parameter ID, and it has a function called LowerAlloca."
LLVM,NVPTX,1369,"</s>

Type: <s> Return nullptr; </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1370,"continue

There will be a closing bracket for the ""continue"" block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1371,"continue ; }</s>

Auto & ASC = *UI++;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1372,"</s>

Last one of this statement:
<s> // end of code snippet </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1373,"</s>

No more statements left in this code snippet, but the current statement returns a string constant and ends with a semicolon."
LLVM,NVPTX,1374,"The next statement could be the end of the code snippet, as the return statement indicates the end of a function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1375,".

This code snippet defines a FunctionPass called ""LowerAlloca"" with an ID of ""ID""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1376,LowerAlloca passes the given ID value to FunctionPass.
LLVM,NVPTX,1377,"BI -> setOperand ( <NUM_LIT> , NewASCToGeneric ) ; continue ; } }
NewASCToGeneric -> insertAfter ( NewASCToLocal ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1378,auto Call = dyn_cast <CallInst>(AllocaUse.getUser());
LLVM,NVPTX,1379,"if ( GE

Finalize the transformation and return true"
LLVM,NVPTX,1380,"continue ; }

An if statement checking if BI is a BitCastInst and setting its operand <NUM_LIT> to NewASCToGeneric."
LLVM,NVPTX,1381,if ( BI && BI -> getPointerOperand ( ) == allocaInst && ! BI ->
LLVM,NVPTX,1382,"}) ; InstructionsToDelete . push_back ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; }

Value * NewInst = CloneInstInParamAS(I);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1383,"}</s>

The return statement will create a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>LowerArgs class, passing in the target machine as a parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,1384,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1385,"}

""Return the name of the next pass."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1386,"}

the pass name

 ""the pass name"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1387,The next statement would be "return true;"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1388,The next statement will create a new AddrSpaceCastInst using the pointer Ptr and insert it into the code at the location determined by the InsertPt iterator.
LLVM,NVPTX,1389,The next statement will set the first operand of PtrInGlobal to the previous value of Ptr.
LLVM,NVPTX,1390,"I'm sorry, I'm not sure which statement you are referring to. Please provide more context or information."
LLVM,NVPTX,1391,"LowerArgs (const <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine * TM = nullptr) : CallGraphSCCPass(ID), TM(TM), MFI(nullptr) {"
LLVM,NVPTX,1392,Assert handleByValParam(&Arg) successfully handles the ByValParam argument type.
LLVM,NVPTX,1393,return isEmbeddedFunction (F) ? runOnEmbeddedFunction (F) : runOnServerFunction (F);
LLVM,NVPTX,1394,"return createResult ( F )

return merge(fp.conv_fp(F))

merge(fp.conv_fp(F))
return isKernelFunction ( F ) ? runOnKernelFunction ( F ) : runOnDeviceFunction ( F ) ;return createResult ( F )"
LLVM,NVPTX,1395,"} } else { markPointerAsGlobal ( LI ) ; } } } } } 

This code is used to find load instructions that reference an argument and apply the `byval` attribute to each of these arguments in order to make sure that they are correctly passed by value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1396,AllocA->insertAfter(AllocA);
LLVM,NVPTX,1397,"The next statement could be a conditional statement that checks if the PType is a pointer type, and if so, performs some operation related to that type."
LLVM,NVPTX,1398,"The new statement will create a new instance of AddrSpaceCastInst, passing in the value of Arg, a pointer type of StructType with an address space of ADDRESS_SPACE_PARAM, the name of Arg, and the FirstInst as parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1399,"<

The next statement is: ArgInParam->replaceAllUsesWith(AddrCast);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1400,"return false ; } }</s>

Check if the value is a load instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1401,"The next statement would be: 
unsigned AS = DL . getAllocaAddrSpace ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1402,"The next statement will initialize a new AllocaInst, passing in the StructType, address space, argument name, and FirstInst as arguments."
LLVM,NVPTX,1403,"The code snippet will enter a for loop that iterates through every argument in function F and checks for any byval attributes. It is possible that within this for loop, the code may perform some action based on if the current argument has a byval attribute or not."
LLVM,NVPTX,1404,"""end of for loop"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1405,The code will continue to manipulate the Allocate Instruction (AllocA) by setting its alignment and replacing the uses of the current argument (Arg) with the new Allocate Instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,1406,"""Type * ValueType = StructType -> getContainedType(0);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1407,"The next statement will likely be a variable or function that utilizes the previously defined variables and functions, possibly to access information about the data layout of the code's parent function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1408,"The next statement will likely be within the while loop, where the ItemsToConvert list is being iterated over and each instruction is being cloned in the specified address space. It is possible that the next statement could be the call to the ""CloneInstInParamAS"" function or the ""clone"" instruction within the llvm::for_each function, depending on the implementation of the functions used."
LLVM,NVPTX,1409,"}</s>

This code snippet returns a string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,1410,"}

The method is returning a string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,1411,The next statement will likely be a function call to set the alignment of the newly created Alloca instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,1412,We cannot predict the next statement as there is no specific pattern or information provided to make an accurate prediction. The next statement will depend on the programmer's intention and the overall goal of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,1413,"</s>

The next statement is likely to modify the pointer's address space to global and replace all its uses with the newly modified pointer."
LLVM,NVPTX,1414,"The next statement is: ""Value * PtrInLocal = new AddrSpaceCastInst(PtrInGeneric, Ptr->getType(), Ptr->getName(), &*InsertPt);""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1415,"None, the code has reached the end and will not have another statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1416,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of F, Argument, TM, and STR_LIT. The next line could be any statement within the for loop depending on the values of these variables."
LLVM,NVPTX,1417,"Value * ArgInGeneric = new AddrSpaceCastInst (ArgInGlobal, Arg->getType(), Arg->getName(), FirstInst);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1418,ArgInGlobal->eraseFromParent();
LLVM,NVPTX,1419,else if ( TM && TM -> getDrvInterface ( ) == <INT_LIT> ) handlePointerParam ( & Arg ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1420,"</s>

Throw an exception indicating that the pointer argument does not have the expected <STR_LIT> attribute."
LLVM,NVPTX,1421,"}

The next statement will likely involve manipulating the InsertPt iterator, potentially by moving it to a different location or using it to insert code. This could be done using methods such as .next() or .insert()."
LLVM,NVPTX,1422,new LowerKernelArgs ( TM ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1423,"The next statement would be:

Return Inst->getFirstNonPHI();"
LLVM,NVPTX,1424,Value * ArgElem = LI->getOperand(0);
LLVM,NVPTX,1425,"The next statement is likely to be an opening curly bracket ""{"", indicating the start of the code block for the LowerKernelArgs function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1426,LowerKernelArgs (nullptr);
LLVM,NVPTX,1427,"The next statement could be a for loop that iterates through all arguments passed to the function and checks if they are pointer types. If they are, it checks if they have the byval attribute and handles it accordingly. If not, it checks if there is a target machine and if it is of a specific driver interface, then it marks the pointer as global."
LLVM,NVPTX,1428,"</s>


The next statement will likely involve initializing or defining a new instance of the LowerStructArgs class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1429,None
LLVM,NVPTX,1430,"The next statement might be a variable declaration or assignment related to the ones already given, such as:
- Variable *SomeVar = new Variable();
- SomeVar->prop = BitcastArgs[0];"
LLVM,NVPTX,1431,Function * Return = CvtFunc->getReturnType();
LLVM,NVPTX,1432,"</s>

The prediction is that the program will continue with the execution of code within the curly braces after evaluating the if condition. It will check whether the argument ""Arg"" is a pointer type and has the ""byval"" attribute, and if so, it will call the function ""handleParam"" with a pointer to the argument. After completing the execution of code within the curly braces, the program will reach the end of the function and terminate."
LLVM,NVPTX,1433,No statement will be executed as the closing curly bracket marks the end of the code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1434,"</s>

<s> <ISA_LIT>ProcessTarget ( Target ) : Return ( StructArgs ) ;</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1435,lowerStructure(ID);
LLVM,NVPTX,1436,"</s>

The next statement will check if the function F is a kernel function using the isKernelFunction() function. If it is not a kernel function, the runOnFunction() function will return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,1437,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will contain the desired image handle at the specified index, converted to a c-string."
LLVM,NVPTX,1438,The code will return the value of the element at index "Idx" in the "ImageHandleList" and convert it to a string before returning it.
LLVM,NVPTX,1439,"If the condition of the if statement is not met, the code will reach the next statement which is adding the value of ""Symbol"" to the end of the ""ImageHandleList"" vector using the push_back() function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1440,"</s>

<s>/* Function body goes here */</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1441,<DV>{
LLVM,NVPTX,1442,CodeAlignDirective = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1443,It is impossible to predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete.
LLVM,NVPTX,1444,The next statement will check if the boolean shouldOmitSectionDirective is true or false for the given SectionName.
LLVM,NVPTX,1445,"Data8bitsDirective

AsciiDirective = nullptr;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1446,Data32bitsDirective = nullptr;
LLVM,NVPTX,1447,No statement can be accurately predicted based on the above code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1448,"""The CodePointerSize and CalleeSaveStackSlotSize variables will be set to an unknown numerical value, and the CommentString variable will be set to an unknown string."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1449,"""End of code snippet."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1450,CommentString = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1451,"<S>

DataTypeDirective = <STR_LIT> ; DefaultGlobalDataName = <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1452,"GlobalDirective = <STR_LIT>

CodeEnd = <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1453,HasDataRegionDirective = true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1454,CodeBlockStart = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1455,"HasEHDirective = true

The next statement might be: UseExternalLibraries = true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1456,ExpectedOutputFormat = AVRO ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1457,The next statement could be: Data16bitsDirective = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1458,"The next statement is:

InlineAsmEnd = <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1459,"</s>

There is no way to predict the next statement without more context or information about the purpose or language of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1460,"</s>

""HasSingleParameterDotFile = true ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1461,"There will be a new statement regarding an instruction or directive related to location or data interpretation, such as a LocDirective or a BinaryDirective."
LLVM,NVPTX,1462,"print ""hello"" } </s>

SyntaxError: unexpected identifier 'anchor'"
LLVM,NVPTX,1463,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be:
return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1464,Error: A semicolon is missing after the AsciiDirective.
LLVM,NVPTX,1465,The next statement will most likely be a conditional statement that checks if the return value of E -> getKind() is equal to MCExpr :: Target and takes appropriate action based on the result.
LLVM,NVPTX,1466,"The code will return a variable created with DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT as the input type, using the Flt variable and the specified context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1467,This code snippet most likely returns a created double precision float variable with the given context.
LLVM,NVPTX,1468,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1469,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,1470,"</s>


The code likely continues with a closing curly brace to end the function definition."
LLVM,NVPTX,1471,The code snippet will continue to modify and fix up ELF symbols in TLS fixups.
LLVM,NVPTX,1472,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing what has already been written in the code snippet. The snippet as it is does not provide enough information to determine what will come next.
LLVM,NVPTX,1473,"}
The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace representing the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1474,"Kind return _kind ; </s>

There appears to be a syntax error in this code. The ""Kind"" keyword is not properly placed in the return statement. It should be before the underscore, like this: return Kind_ _kind;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1475,Impossible to predict without knowing the contents of the variable "Kind".
LLVM,NVPTX,1476,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context about the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1477,I cannot predict the next statement without more information. Can you please provide the rest of the code snippet?
LLVM,NVPTX,1478,"class Step <ISA_LIT>floatnext ( VariantKind Kind , APFloat Flt ) 

The next statement is most likely to declare a constructor for the class Step with parameters of VariantKind and APFloat."
LLVM,NVPTX,1479,"<ISA_LIT>
return this->Flt;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1480,"</s>


return SymExpr;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1481,"</s>

</s> SymExpr (_SymExpr ->CreatePossiblyFwdRef)"
LLVM,NVPTX,1482,"return new <ISA_LIT>GenericMCSymbolRefExpr ( SymExpr , Ctx );"",

""return new <ISA_LIT>GenericMCSymbolRefExpr (SymExpr, Ctx);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1483,return nullptr;
LLVM,NVPTX,1484,"I am unable to predict the next statement since I do not have enough information about what the 'create' function does or the values of VK_<ISA_LIT>_HALF_PREC_FLOAT, Flt, and Ctx."
LLVM,NVPTX,1485,"__isa""));

return create(VK_<ISA_LIT>_SINGLE_PREC_FLOAT, Flt, Ctx);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1486,"</s>

The next statement will be to return the result of the ""create"" function, passing in ""VK_<ISA_LIT>_SINGLE_PREC_FLOAT"", ""Flt"", and ""Ctx"" as arguments."
LLVM,NVPTX,1487,"The next statement will likely define the constructor function for the FloatMCExpr class, with the two parameters Kind and Flt passed into the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1488,"}

{

The next statement will likely be the opening curly bracket for the constructor body."
LLVM,NVPTX,1489,"There is either no more code to execute, or the next statement is not provided in this code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1490,The next statement could potentially be a curly brace indicating the start of the function body.
LLVM,NVPTX,1491,return new (Flt);
LLVM,NVPTX,1492,"} In the printImpl method of the GenericMCSymbolRefExpr class, the given raw_ostream object will output the string literal and the referenced symbol expression, followed by another string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,1493,"""The code snippet includes an output statement that will print a string literal followed by a symbol expression."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1494,"}

""Nothing is returned as the value is set to false."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1495,"""It will print the converted value of API as a hex string with leading 0s if necessary."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1496,"if (HexStr.length() >= NumHex) {
  OS << HexStr;
} else {
  OS << std::string(NumHex - HexStr.length(), '0') + HexStr;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1497,"</

This code returns a new FloatMCExpr with the given Kind and Flt parameters, wrapped in a Ctx object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1498,"This code snippet creates a new instance of a FloatMCExpr object using the Ctx context, Kind value, and Flt value. It then returns this new object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1499,"</s>

The next statement would likely be related to creating a floating point value with double precision and a specified context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1500,"</s>
There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could depend on the values of VK_<ISA_LIT>_SINGLE_PREC_FLOAT, Flt, and Ctx."
LLVM,NVPTX,1501,"}

There is not enough information to predict the next statement. It will depend on the context and purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet alone, it appears that the next statement may involve evaluating a boolean value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1502,The code will override the function "FindAssociatedSection" and return the constant MCSection.
LLVM,NVPTX,1503,The code snippet ends.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1505,"return SP_NewThis}

return nullptr"
LLVM,NVPTX,1506,OS << HexStr ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1507,OS << "converting to double precision float";
LLVM,NVPTX,1508,"return new <ISA_LIT>MCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1509,"}


The next statement will check if the syntax variant is equal to a number, and if so, it will return a new ISA_LITInstPrinter instance using the given parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1510,return X;
LLVM,NVPTX,1511,"</s>

<e> Initialise Register Info for ISA X with number count <NUM_LIT> ; </e>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1512,"{return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1513,"return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS, hasExtension(A))"
LLVM,NVPTX,1514,"TargetRegistry::RegisterAsmTargetStreamer(*T, createTargetAsmStreamer);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1515,"""TargetRegistry::RegisterAsmPrinter(*T, create<ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1516,X->getNumRegs();
LLVM,NVPTX,1517,"</s>

X->InitMCRegisterInfo();"
LLVM,NVPTX,1518,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCSubtargetInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCSubtargetInfo ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1519,It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the specific implementation of the "initMCCodeGenInfo" function and the objects CM and OL provided to it.
LLVM,NVPTX,1520,"X -> setTargetCpu ( TT ) ; }

return X;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1521,The next statement is "return <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1522,"return new ISA_LITMCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI, STI);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1523,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmBackend ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmBackend ) ; Next, we will register the target-specific MCNameMangler."
LLVM,NVPTX,1524,"The next statement will be: 
TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCRelocationInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCRelocationInfo ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1525,return X;
LLVM,NVPTX,1526,This code snippet initializes a MCSubtargetInfo object with the given parameters and returns it.
LLVM,NVPTX,1527,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCRegInfo ( The<ISA_LIT>Target64 , create<ISA_LIT>MCRegisterInfo ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1528,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCInstPrinter (The<ISA_LIT>Target64, create<ISA_LIT>MCInstPrinter);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1529,"The next statement would be the end of the code block, possibly followed by other code snippets or the end of the program."
LLVM,NVPTX,1530,"if (SyntaxVariant == 1) {
    return new ARMInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI, STI);
} else {
    return nullptr;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1531,"</s>

It is likely that the code will return a nullptr value, since this is the default action if the if statement condition is not met."
LLVM,NVPTX,1532,"}</s>

<X>MCRegisterInfo * Create<ISA_LIT>MCRegisterInfo()"
LLVM,NVPTX,1533,"</s>

return new MCInstrInfo()"
LLVM,NVPTX,1534,"""Invoke the Init function on X with the parameters ISA_LIT and NUM_LIT and then return X."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1535,Missing semicolon.
LLVM,NVPTX,1536,"This Macro builds a MCSubtargetInfo object configured for the specified processor in the given Triple string. }

return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1537,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCSubtargetInfo ( The<ISA_LIT>Target32 , create<ISA_LIT>SubtargetInfo ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1538,const MachineBasicBlock *PrevMBB = Prev.getParent();
LLVM,NVPTX,1539,The code will check if the Previous Operand has only one Non-DBG use.
LLVM,NVPTX,1540,The next statement of this code snippet will be a conditional statement that returns true if the base address operand is equal to a string literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,1541,"}

if ( MRI . use_empty ( <STR_LIT> ) ) {
// more code to follow"
LLVM,NVPTX,1542,"auto Reg = MRI . createVirtualRegister ( MVT :: i32 ) ;

auto Instr = BuildMI ( MBB , Root , Root . getDebugLoc ( ) , TII . get ( Opc ) )

.addDef ( Reg );

Reg is being used to create a virtual register using the getRegInfo() function from the MachineFunction class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1543,Branch instruction added to the basic block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1544,"} }

The next statement will be: 
const auto & AugmentedSPN = MF . getAnalysis<AugmentedSPN> ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1545,auto & MBB = * MBB . end();
LLVM,NVPTX,1546,This code snippet does not seem complete and would result in an error.
LLVM,NVPTX,1547,Op should be compared to another value or have some operation performed on it.
LLVM,NVPTX,1548,"const <ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo * NRI = MF . getSubtarget < <ISA_LIT>Subtarget > ( )

.getRegisterInfo ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1549,The code will check if the frame register is empty in the machine function and assign the value to a register called MRI.
LLVM,NVPTX,1550,"This code snippet checks if the frame register is unused, and if it is, removes it from the parent instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1551,"if (MRI.hasOneNonDBGUse(Prev.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg())) {
  Prev.eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval();
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1552,"MIB = BuildMI ( MF , Root . getDebugLoc ( ) , TII -> get ( Prev . getOpcode ( ) ) , Root . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getReg ( ) ) . addReg ( NRI -> getFrameLocalRegister ( MF ) ) . add ( Root . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1553,"}</s>

llvm::MachineFunctionPass * llvm::create<ISA_LIT>Peephole()
{
    return new <ISA_LIT>Peephole();
}
The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function definition or a semicolon to mark the end of the function declaration."
LLVM,NVPTX,1554,"</s>

</s> throw new Error(""Cannot instantiate class Peephole"");"
LLVM,NVPTX,1555,"</s>

The next statement could be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function or a continuation of the function with additional code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1556,"""The pass name will be returned as a constant StringRef."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1557,"""It will return a StringRef named 'STR_LIT'."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1558,"}

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1559,"The next statement could be a continuation of the if statement, checking for additional conditions before executing the block of code within the if statement. It could also be the start of a new if or else statement if the current if statement is completed."
LLVM,NVPTX,1560,"next


 MI.removeFromParent ( ) ; Changed = true ; } } 

 or 

continue;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1561,"}

if (StackGrowsDown) { FlushCaches(); }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1562,"MaxAlign = std :: max ( Align , MaxAlign ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1563,"else StackAlign = 1


The next statement would be a closing curly brace to end the outer for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1564,"}

This code snippet likely creates and returns an instance of the <ISA_LIT>PrologEpilogPass class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1565,"</s>

<s> m_TSCI ( ) : TargetTransformInfo ( & ) { </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1566,"// perform some optimizations on the machine function

return ID + 1;

}

// end of PrologEpilogPass ( )"
LLVM,NVPTX,1567,"</s>

Initialize the instruction iterator to the beginning of the current basic block (BB)."
LLVM,NVPTX,1568,"MFI . setObjectOffset ( FrameIdx , Offset ) ; }

In the next statement, the code snippet will check if the stack grows downwards and if so, it will print out the current frame index and the calculated offset with a negative sign. If the stack does not grow downwards, it will simply set the offset for the current frame index to be equal to the calculated offset."
LLVM,NVPTX,1569,"}

The code snippet compares the direction in which the stack grows (up or down) and prints the frame index and offset for the current object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1570,"""The variable 'MaxAlign' is set to the maximum alignment value of the MFI object, and if the MFI object is using a local stack allocation block, the 'Offset' variable is increased by the aligned local frame size and the 'MaxAlign' variable is updated to be the larger of the current and new alignment values."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1571,"The code will check if the current iterator is on the return block and if so, it will emit an epilogue for the machine function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1572,// end of code snippet
LLVM,NVPTX,1573,"}

the code will check if the stack grows down, and if it does, it will set the offset to be equal to the object size of FrameIdx. It will then calculate the alignment of FrameIdx and update the MaxAlign variable to the maximum value between MaxAlign and Align. It will then update the offset to align with the alignment value, and if the stack grows down, it will print out the FrameIdx, negative offset, and a string. Finally, it will set the object offset of FrameIdx to be equal to -Offset."
LLVM,NVPTX,1574,"""So, we first check if the FrameIdx is greater than Offset, and if it is, we set a new offset for the object. Otherwise, we print the values of FrameIdx and Offset, and then set the offset for the object and add the size of the object to the current offset."
LLVM,NVPTX,1575,The next statement is: "if (!TFI.targetHandlesStackFrameRounding() ) {".
LLVM,NVPTX,1576,There is no <NUM_LIT> parameter for the call to eliminateFrameIndex.
LLVM,NVPTX,1577,"NewMaxAlign = std::max(MaxAlign, Alignment);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1578,"MI.getDebugExpression().prepend(DIExpression::ApplyOffset, Offset);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1579,"}
The next statement would be to update the frame index for the current MachineInstr using the eliminateFrameIndex function from the TargetRegisterInfo class, passing in the adjusted offset and operand indices. This will also set the ""Modified"" flag to true."
LLVM,NVPTX,1580,"} Modified = <VAL_LIT> ; } Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

if (Modified == true) { /* Code to handle modified statement */ }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1581,"Modified = true ; } else {

""Modified = true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1582,"}


One possible statement that could come after this code snippet is: 
MI->getOperand(i).setOffset(TRI->getFrameIndexOffset(i)); 
This would update the offset of the operand to the value obtained from the TargetRegisterInfo."
LLVM,NVPTX,1583,"} }
The next statement is: 
 
return Modified;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1584,This code snippet is likely used to emit code for the prologue and epilogue of a function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1585,"Modified = true ; }

The next statement would likely be 'TFI.emitEpilogue(MF);' to complete the creation and manipulation of the machine code instructions before exiting the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1586,The code snippet is likely performing some computation on register info and frame object offsets within a specified MachineFunction. The next statement will probably involve accessing or modifying a specific operand within a MachineInstr MI.
LLVM,NVPTX,1587,Next statement: MFI.setLocalFrameObjectAllocationBlockOffset(Offset);
LLVM,NVPTX,1588,"}

"" assert ( i == <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ) ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1589,"std :: pair <<STR_LIT> , bool > <s>

If MFI.isDeadObjectIndex(i) returns true, then the code will continue to the next iteration of the for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1590,"DIExpr = DIExpression :: append ( DIExpr , DIExpression :: Piece ) 
Ops.push_back(Offset);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1591,">

Offset = MFI->getLocalFrameSize();"
LLVM,NVPTX,1592,"</s>

It would be the end of the code snippet, since it is ending with a semicolon and does not contain any conditional statements or loops."
LLVM,NVPTX,1593,"}</s>

The returned value will be a new instance of the ISA_LITProxyRegErasure class object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1594,The next statement will return a string literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,1595,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be an ""end"" or ""closing"" statement to complete the function or code block. For example: ""end function"" or ""}"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1596,PassManager PM;
LLVM,NVPTX,1597,"</s>

The next statement would iterate through the machine instructions in a particular basic block and replace the usage of a specific register with another one."
LLVM,NVPTX,1598,"""}"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1599,"The next statement could potentially be a comment explaining the purpose or function of the ""replaceRegisterUsage"" method, or it could be a line of code that calls the method or utilizes its output."
LLVM,NVPTX,1600,"<STR_LIT>
The code snippet is missing a closing curly brace so it is likely that the next statement would be the closing curly brace for the second for loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,1601,The next statement is the end of the switch statement and the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1602,The next statement will likely continue to manipulate the returned string by calling the method "c_str()" again.
LLVM,NVPTX,1603,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It is likely that the code continues with other statements, but without knowing the context and purpose of this code, it is impossible to say what the next statement will be."
LLVM,NVPTX,1604,int Offset2 = MF . getFrameInfo ( ) . getObjectOffset ( FrameIndex ) + MI . getOperand ( FIOperandNum + 1 ) . getImm ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1605,"return <STR_LIT> ; }</s>

The next statement of this code snippet could be another ""else if"" statement or an ""else"" statement, or the end of the current ""if-else"" block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1606,"return <STR_LIT> ; }

There are no more statements to be predicted since this code ends with closing brackets."
LLVM,NVPTX,1607,No prediction can be made as the code snippet does not indicate what values RC and STR_LIT represent.
LLVM,NVPTX,1608,if ( RC == & <STR_LIT> ) return <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1609,The next statement could be an "else" statement that returns "<STR_LIT>".
LLVM,NVPTX,1610,"If the specified machine function has an active frame, return the register used for the frame pointer."
LLVM,NVPTX,1611,"</s>

In the next statement, there will be a keyword ""return"" followed by a variable or value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1612,return CalleeSavedRegClasses;
LLVM,NVPTX,1613,"return CalleeSavedRegs ; }</s>
""The function will return the array of callee-saved registers stored in the CalleeSavedRegs variable."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1614,"The return statement will return the array of callee-saved registers, CalleeSavedRegs."
LLVM,NVPTX,1615,"}

The next statement is a return statement, followed by a numerical value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1616,"}</s>

The next statement will likely define the function body for ""getDwarfRegNum"" which will return a number as specified by the <NUM_LIT> placeholder."
LLVM,NVPTX,1617,"return <STR_LIT> ; }</s>

The next statement would be a closing curly brace ""}"" to end the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1618,"""return RARegister"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1619,"The next statement is likely to contain a function or method call, possibly related to initialization of the RegisterInfo class using the given parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1620,"<ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo :: <ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo ( const TargetRegisterInfo & tri ) : <ISA_LIT>GenRegisterInfo ( <NUM_LIT> ) , Is64Bit ( tri . is64Bit ( ) )"
LLVM,NVPTX,1621,MF.getFrameInfo()->getObjectOffset(FrameIndex) + MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + <NUM_LIT> - 1).getImm();
LLVM,NVPTX,1622,"<?RegClass cost ?>

The statement may involve some sort of comparison or calculation using the cost variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1623,"Depending on the language and context, the next statement could either be:
1. A return statement, possibly returning a value based on the arguments provided.
2. An if statement, performing further checks or actions based on the arguments provided.
3. Another function call or assignment statement using the function's return value.
4. A comment or empty statement, if the function does not have any additional logic."
LLVM,NVPTX,1624,"} </s>

else if ( RC == & <STR_LIT> ) { return <STR_LIT> ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1625,"}


The next statement will likely be an ""else"" statement or the end of the code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1626,"return <STR_LIT> ; } 

} else if ( RC == & <STR_LIT> ) { return <STR_LIT> ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1627,"return <STR_LIT> ; }
The next statement is <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1628,"The next statement is likely to involve the use of the ""Offset"" variable in some way, such as storing it in another variable or using it in a mathematical operation."
LLVM,NVPTX,1629,"The next statement would be: 
 <s> MI . getOperand ( FIOperandNum ) . ChangeToRegister ( <STR_LIT> , false ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1630,"}

CalleeSavedRegs[0]"
LLVM,NVPTX,1631,"</s>

cerr << ""Frame register not found in MachineFunction\n """
LLVM,NVPTX,1632,This statement will return a frame register from the given machine function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1633,"} </s>

The next statement could be: ""else { return null ; }"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1634,"The next statement would be the end of the if-else chain, returning a string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,1635,return RegisterInfo object with given Subtarget and GenRegisterInfo and is64Bit set with Subtarget's is64Bit function
LLVM,NVPTX,1636,this . Is64Bit = st . is64Bit ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1637,return CalleeSavedRegClasses;
LLVM,NVPTX,1638,return MBB.end();
LLVM,NVPTX,1639,MI.getOperand(i + 2).getImm();
LLVM,NVPTX,1640,"MI . getOperand ( i <NUM_LIT> ) . <s>

getOffset (PointedToOperand & PtrOp, <ZERO_LIT> BlockSize) const {
  return PtrOp . getOffset ( BlockSize ) ;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1641,"The next statement is an ""if"" statement with the condition ""RC -> getID ( ) == <STR_LIT>"", followed by a ""return"" statement with the expression ""& <STR_LIT>""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1642,"No statement is specified in the given code snippet, so it is not possible to predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1643,There is no code left to predict as the snippet ends with the last "if" statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1644,"}

This code snippet does not provide enough information for a meaningful prediction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1645,"return
<STR_LIT> ;
 }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1646,"</s>

llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1647,"</s>

None of the previous if statements return true, so the next statement will likely be an else statement or a statement following the if statements."
LLVM,NVPTX,1648,"return <STR_LIT> ; }
The next statement could be another ""else if"" statement, another ""return"" statement, or the closing curly brace of the function. It could also be a different statement within one of the existing ""else if"" blocks. It is difficult to determine the exact next statement without more context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1649,"It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet will involve manipulating the MI operand and changing it to an immediate value. This could involve performing some sort of arithmetic operation or setting a specific value. However, it is impossible to know for certain without seeing more of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1650,"</s>

 <s> </s>

The next statement will likely be a return statement, followed by a closing curly bracket."
LLVM,NVPTX,1651,"</s>

TM.initializeSubtargetInfo(*this);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1652,"The next statement will use a conditional operator to determine whether TM is 64-bit or not, and return one of two string literals accordingly."
LLVM,NVPTX,1653,"</s>

MF.emit(code);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1654,return "TM.getRegisterInfo()->getFrameRegister(MF)";
LLVM,NVPTX,1655,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information about the code and its purpose. The code snippet could potentially return different values based on the value of RC, or it could be nested within a loop or conditional statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1656,The next statement will most likely be another "if" statement similar to the previous ones.
LLVM,NVPTX,1657,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It depends on the values of RC and <STR_LIT> and the logic of the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,1658,"This code snippet defines a constructor for the RegisterInfo class that inherits properties from the GenRegisterInfo class. The constructor takes in an integer parameter, likely to specify the size of the register."
LLVM,NVPTX,1659,"// Code to initialize RegisterInfo

<ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo ::<ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo ( ) :<ISA_LIT>GenRegisterInfo ( <NUM_LIT> ),<S> { 
    // Code to initialize RegisterInfo 
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1660,"The next statement is most likely the return statement, which will return the name of the pass as a StringRef."
LLVM,NVPTX,1661,"case <STR_LIT> : MachineOperand & ImageHandle = MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; replaceImageHandle ( ImageHandle , MF ) ; return true ;

MachineOperand & ImageHandle = MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; replaceImageHandle ( ImageHandle , MF ) ; return true ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1662,Stop execution of the switch statement using the default case.
LLVM,NVPTX,1663,"}

If the value of MCID.TSFlags AND <STR_LIT> is false, the code will execute the else if statement starting with ""else if (MCID.TSFlags & <STR_LIT>)""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1664,"return <STR_LIT> ;

It is likely that this code snippet is used to handle multiple cases of string literals, where the next statement will likely be another case followed by a return statement with a string literal. It could potentially be used in a switch statement to perform different actions based on the value of the string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,1665,"The code will return false if the statement ""findIndexForHandle(Op, MF, Idx)"" evaluates to false."
LLVM,NVPTX,1666,The next statement will be: "return Changed;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1667,"</s>

The statement would be: ""return Changed ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1668,"MF . getOrCreateGlobalValue ( Sym . str ( ) , <NULL LIT> ) ; break ; <s>

The next statement is likely the closing brace (""}"") for the ""case <STR_LIT>:"" block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1669,The next statement is "Idx = MFI -> getImageHandleSymbolIndex ( GV -> getName ( ) . data ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1670,"</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""getPassName"" that returns a const pointer to a char and overrides a const function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1671,Changed |= processInstr ( MI ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1672,"This code snippet is incomplete, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1673,"}
 It will create and return a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>ReplaceImageHandlesPass class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1674,"}

 ""if (Res) {
InstructionToRemove.insert(&TexHandleDef);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1675,"</S>

""; </S>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1676,"</s>

return ""PassName"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,1677,<ISA_LIT>ReplaceImageHandles analysis pass has been successfully created.
LLVM,NVPTX,1678,"""// Define a method called ReplaceImageHandles, which is a MachineFunctionPass with ID as a parameter and empty constructor."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1679,"return true ; }

The next statement is likely ""return false;"" if none of the previous if or else if statements were executed."
LLVM,NVPTX,1680,"<Send> <Self> ::receiveImage(<ArgumentIndex> => x is an <IMAGE_LIT>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context about the code and its purpose."
LLVM,NVPTX,1681,"The next statement could possibly be something along the lines of:

Idx = 0; // initializing the variable to a value of zero"
LLVM,NVPTX,1682,if (I->isReturn()) return;
LLVM,NVPTX,1683,"</ISA_LIT>


<ISA_LIT> If the section variant and kind are not specified, the section will be set to nullptr."
LLVM,NVPTX,1684,return this;
LLVM,NVPTX,1685,"PrintNextSwitchToSection(MAI, T, OS, Subsection);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1686,"</s>

The next statement will likely perform some operations using the variables and override function specified in the header."
LLVM,NVPTX,1687,"return true; }</s>

No statement - end of code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1688,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1689,<s>
LLVM,NVPTX,1690,"The next statement is most likely to be an opening curly brace, indicating the start of a function definition."
LLVM,NVPTX,1691,"Sorry, this is impossible to predict without more context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1692,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context.
LLVM,NVPTX,1693,"</s>SAC( ) }

 <s> ~ <ISA_LIT> </s>Section* ( ) {</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1694,"The next statement is probably the closing bracket, as this code snippet defines a function that returns a string value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1695,There is no next statement to predict as the code snippet is complete. It will likely output or return the string literal indicated by <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,NVPTX,1696,"This code snippet defines a function called PrintSwitchToSection that takes in three arguments: MAI, OS, and Subsection."
LLVM,NVPTX,1697,The next statement could potentially call the PrintSwitchToSection function with specific parameters.
LLVM,NVPTX,1698,"It is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be the actual return statement, which will include the string literal that is being returned."
LLVM,NVPTX,1699,The function will return a string literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,1700,"It is likely that the next statement will be the closing bracket for the return statement, followed by a semicolon. So it could be something like:

    return ""Hello World!"";"
LLVM,NVPTX,1701,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing what the <STR_LIT> represents.
LLVM,NVPTX,1702,The next statement is the end of the code block or the program will move on to the next line outside the code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1703,"}

true



The next statement would be the closing curly brace } indicating the end of the bool isBaseAddressKnownZero() function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1704,"return MCSection(V, K);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1705,"Inherits properties from MCSection ( V , K ) and specifies properties for SectionVariant V and SectionKind K."
LLVM,NVPTX,1706,"</s

{ return """"; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1707,"This code overrides a function to print the switch to a new section using the given asm info and output stream, with the given subsection."
LLVM,NVPTX,1708,The code should end with a semicolon at the end of the line.
LLVM,NVPTX,1709,"</s>

This code snippet most likely returns ""false"" as the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1710,"I apologize, as I am an AI and do not have access to the context or code for this snippet. I cannot predict the next statement without more information."
LLVM,NVPTX,1711,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the content of the Section class or its parent class.
LLVM,NVPTX,1712,"</s>

AU.addPreserved<MachineLoopInfo>() ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1713,"</s>

The next statement will likely be to instantiate a new object of type ""SplitBBatBar"" and return it."
LLVM,NVPTX,1714,<s> AU . addRequired < AliasAnalysis > ( ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1715,"}</s><s> return <NEXT_BB1> ; </s>

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1716,"</s>

<s>}</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1717,The next statement will likely be the opening curly brace indicating the start of the function's body.
LLVM,NVPTX,1718,"}



Changed = true"
LLVM,NVPTX,1719,"</s>

<s> print ""Running FP16 math."" if hasFP16Math() && !NoF16Math; </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1720,No prediction possible
LLVM,NVPTX,1721,"""Initializing subtarget dependencies and setting TM and TLInfo with the given CPU and FS."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1722,<s> The code snippet initializes the PTXVersion and SmVersion variables and sets the TM and TLInfo variables with the values passed in by the user.
LLVM,NVPTX,1723,"</s>

 1. The anchor function will set a value of a specific register."
LLVM,NVPTX,1724,"</s>

return;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1725,"}</s
The next statement is likely to define a function or method called ""getFrameLowering"" that returns a pointer to the ""FrameLowering"" variable. It will also specify that this function overrides a previous function by the same name and has a return type of ""const TargetFrameLowering *""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1726,return m_targetFrameLowering;
LLVM,NVPTX,1727,"}

}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1728,The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the getRegisterInfo function or another statement using the returned value from the InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo() function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1729,"A potential next statement for this code snippet could be a return statement, which would end the function and possibly return a value or object. For example:

return DAGInfo; // assuming DAGInfo is a variable or object declared earlier in the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1730,return m_smVersion;
LLVM,NVPTX,1731,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the context in which this code is being used. Additionally, the code snippet seems incomplete as it does not specify what variable or data is being returned."
LLVM,NVPTX,1732,The code snippet will likely return the value of the variable TLInfo.
LLVM,NVPTX,1733,"}

""""



Error: This is not a complete code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1734,"}

It is likely that the next line of code would involve using the returned TargetName string variable in some way, such as setting it equal to a new variable or passing it as an argument to another function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1735,return SmVersion >= <NUM_LIT>+1;
LLVM,NVPTX,1736,"</s>

""return SmVersion >= 32;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1737,"</s>

throw Error;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1738,FALSE
LLVM,NVPTX,1739,return SmVersion >= 1;
LLVM,NVPTX,1740,"</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement with the given information. The code snippet does not provide enough context to determine the intended purpose or functionality beyond what is already stated."
LLVM,NVPTX,1741,"</s>

True"
LLVM,NVPTX,1742,Syntax error: Missing "DOT_OPERATOR" after "SmVersion >= <NUM_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1743,//This code snippet does not provide enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could be anything related to the code or it could be a continuation of the comment.
LLVM,NVPTX,1744,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1745,"</s>

bool exitFlag1 = false ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1746,"return std::isinf(1.0);
}

The next statement would most likely be a closing curly brace."
LLVM,NVPTX,1747,"</s>

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,1748,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of SmVersion and <NUM_LIT>. It would depend on their respective values and what logical comparison operator is being used (e.g. "">="", ""<"", ""=="")."
LLVM,NVPTX,1749,"</s>

True"
LLVM,NVPTX,1750,"</s>
</s> statement = If you have an LDU, then we can return true.</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1751,"</s>

According to the code snippet, the next statement will evaluate whether the function hasHWROT32 returns true or the function hasSWROT32 returns true, and will return the logical OR of the two values."
LLVM,NVPTX,1752,"</s>

return _rot64 != nullptr;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1753,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. Additional context or information about the code is needed.
LLVM,NVPTX,1754,"</s>
double hasSWROT32() const {"
LLVM,NVPTX,1755,Unknown.
LLVM,NVPTX,1756,"The next statement would be: 
PTXVersion = <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1757,"There is no next statement, as the code ends after the return statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1758,"This code snippet defines a Subtarget object with specific parameters and initializes various components such as PTXVersion, SmVersion, TM, InstrInfo, TLInfo, and FrameLowering."
LLVM,NVPTX,1759,The program initializes the FrameLowering object.
LLVM,NVPTX,1760,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of SmVersion and NUM_LIT. They could be numerical values or strings, and the outcome could be a boolean statement or an error message. Without further information, the next statement cannot be accurately predicted."
LLVM,NVPTX,1761,Error: Missing a semicolon at the end of the return statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1762,"<s>

The code will return false and terminate."
LLVM,NVPTX,1763,"}

false"
LLVM,NVPTX,1764,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of SmVersion and <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,NVPTX,1765,"</s>

(False)"
LLVM,NVPTX,1766,"</s>

None, the code snippet is already complete."
LLVM,NVPTX,1767,"""TargetName will be set to PTXVersion."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1768,"Assuming the variable HasAtomScope is a boolean expression, the next statement could be: return HasAtomScope;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1769,"The next statement will return false if the getDrvInterface is not equal to <STR_LIT>, or if the SmVersion is smaller than <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,1770,"This code is initializing the subtarget information and setting the PTX and Sm versions to numerical values. The next statement is likely to define the InstrInfo, TLInfo, and FrameLowering objects, passing in the appropriate arguments."
LLVM,NVPTX,1771,The next statement could be a declaration or initialization of a variable or object using the information provided in the previous statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,1772,<p> if p != null
LLVM,NVPTX,1773,"</s>

The next statement may be a conditional statement checking that the variable p is not null and then performing some action based on that condition. It might look something like: 

```if (p != null) { 
    // do something 
}```"
LLVM,NVPTX,1774,"mysql > nextbool

This code does not seem to have anything to do with the statement ""mysql > nextbool."" Therefore, it is impossible to predict the next statement of this code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1775,"The next statement will be ""strcpy ( Attr . Arch , TargetName . c_str ( ) ) ;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1776,"else if (CPU.empty()) {
  PTXVersion = <NUM_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,1777,PTXVersion = <NUM_LIT>
LLVM,NVPTX,1778,This code snippet does not provide enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1779,"BackingField

nullptr"
LLVM,NVPTX,1780,"The next statement will likely be a return statement, possibly returning a pointer to a SelectionDAGTargetInfo object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1781,"</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context about the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1782,It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context.
LLVM,NVPTX,1783,"</s>This function will check if the system has filed a code <UNK>, or if the agent will file.</s>

This function will return a boolean value representing whether or not the system has filed a code min/max value for the agent."
LLVM,NVPTX,1784,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information about the code.
LLVM,NVPTX,1785,"</s>

return IsConditionMet;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1786,Unknown. The code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information.
LLVM,NVPTX,1787,"// method body would go here
    declared_variables = this.method.constant_variables 
    

    return hasFP16Math;
}

console.log(declared_variables);


The code declares a boolean variable named hasFP16Math and sets it to the value of a method that checks if the class has support for FP16 math. It then returns the value of hasFP16Math and prints the declared variables."
LLVM,NVPTX,1788,The code will assign value from TargetName to SmVersion after converting it to an integer.
LLVM,NVPTX,1789,SmVersion = The numerical value of the TargetName plus the integer value represented by the NUM_LIT constant.
LLVM,NVPTX,1790,"if ( PTXVersion == <NUM_LIT> ) { PTXVersion = <NUM_LIT> ; }
else { // some other code }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1791,The next statement could possibly be closing a curly brace or executing a return statement that returns DL.
LLVM,NVPTX,1792,"}
The function will return a pointer to the data layout object, DL."
LLVM,NVPTX,1793,It is not possible to predict the next statement with the given information. The code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough context to determine what would come after the given line.
LLVM,NVPTX,1794,"The next statement is likely to be defining or initializing a variable for the FrameLowering aspect of the subtarget, as this is the only component that does not have a specific function call or variable initialization."
LLVM,NVPTX,1795,// Call the FrameLowering constructor
LLVM,NVPTX,1796,"The next statement could be: 

SimplifyFC
or
setOptions(T);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1797,"""Ret will contain three string literals concatenated together."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1798,"</s 


It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. It is possible that the snippet is incomplete and the next statement would depend on what the ""& DL"" refers to. It could be a variable, function call, or other instruction. Alternatively, the snippet could be a complete statement and the next line would be the end of the code. Without more information, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1799,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement that returns either a pointer to a DataLayout object or a nullptr if no DataLayout is present."
LLVM,NVPTX,1800,It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet does not provide any context or information about what the "drvInterface" variable is or how it is being used.
LLVM,NVPTX,1801,I cannot predict the next statement without more context. This code snippet appears to be incomplete. Please provide more information.
LLVM,NVPTX,1802,"</s>

There is not enough information to predict the next statement. The snippet may be incomplete."
LLVM,NVPTX,1803,It will return the register info of the instruction information.
LLVM,NVPTX,1804,This code snippet will return the register information from the instruction information.
LLVM,NVPTX,1805,"</s>



This code snippet would likely return the information of ""TSInfo"", potentially as an object or variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1806,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the whole code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1807,"It is likely that the next statement will be related to the ""TLInfo"" variable, possibly accessing or manipulating its data."
LLVM,NVPTX,1808,"</s>


This code snippet likely returns a boolean value of false."
LLVM,NVPTX,1809,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement with the given information. The statement may vary depending on the context and purpose of the code snippet. It could be a continuation of the return statement or could be entirely different code altogether.
LLVM,NVPTX,1810,"}</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context. The code snippet provided is already complete and does not need a next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1811,The next statement would likely be "Target32."
LLVM,NVPTX,1812,"</s>

The code likely declares a static variable named ""TheTarget64"" of a type specific to the instruction set architecture (ISA)."
LLVM,NVPTX,1813,"}

This code snippet registers the target <Triple::nvptx> for the target architecture <ISA_LIT> with the parameters <STR_LIT> and <STR_LIT>, indicating that the next statement may involve initializing these parameters for the target architecture <ISA_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,1814,"""Set up target registration for 'Triple :: nvptx64' with Y as the target identifier, 'getThe<ISA_LIT>Target64()' as the target creation function, and <STR_LIT> and <STR_LIT> as the target description strings."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1815,"RegisterTarget < Triple :: x86 > Z ( getThe<ISA_LIT>TargetX86 ( ) , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1816,DoesNotExistException()
LLVM,NVPTX,1817,"a RegisterTarget < Triple :: nvptx > Y ( The<ISA_LIT>Target64 , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1818,No additional statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,1819,"<
<s> addPass ( createDeadCodeEliminationPass ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1820,"}

addPass (createGVNPass());"
LLVM,NVPTX,1821,"</s>

The next statement would likely be an opening curly brace to begin a new code block or function within the addFastRegAlloc function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1822,removePass ( & PostInlineMachineSinkingID ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1823,"</s>

The next statement could be another call to the ""addPass"" function, followed by another call to the ""printAndVerify"" function with the <STR_LIT> parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,1824,addPass ( & RegisterCoalescerID ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1825,addPass ( create<ISA_SSAPass> ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1826,"addPass ( create<InstructionCombining>Pass ( ) ) ;

Note: The statement cannot be accurately predicted as it depends on the specific functionality and logic of the ISA_LIT and InstructionCombining passes. However, a possible prediction could be:

addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>Pass ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1827,<s> addPass ( create<ISA_RED>ProxyRegErasurePass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1828,"</s>

Add instructions for performing register allocation."
LLVM,NVPTX,1829,"}

The next statement is: ""Throws an error and stops program execution."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1830,"The code execution will stop and an exception will be thrown, as the statement is marked as unreachable and cannot be executed."
LLVM,NVPTX,1831,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement as the code is incomplete and the context is unclear.
LLVM,NVPTX,1832,addPass ( createSparseConditionalConstantPropagationPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1833,"PM . add ( createEarly <ISA_LIT>Instrumentation Pass ( & <ISA_LIT> ));


The next statement is most likely going to be some kind of closing curly brace } indicating the end of the adjustPassManager function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1834,"if (is64Bit && UseShortPointers) {
     return ""e-s:e-p:64:64-i64:64-n32:64"";
  }
  else if (is64Bit) {
    return ""e-s:e-p:64:64-i64:64-n32:64"";
  } else {
    return ""e-s:e-p:32:32-i64:64-n32"";
}

This code snippet will return ""e-s:e-p:64:64-i64:64-n32:64"" if both is64Bit and UseShortPointers are true, ""e-s:e"
LLVM,NVPTX,1835,"""Ret"" will not be incremented by any value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1836,"Next, we might see a return statement indicating the creation of a PassConfig object for the TargetMachine with the specified PassManagerBase PM."
LLVM,NVPTX,1837,"The next statement is likely to initialize a new <ISA_LIT>PassConfig object, passing in the current object and PM as parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1838,"}

/returns the TargetTransformInfo for the given function F/"
LLVM,NVPTX,1839,initialize<ISA_LIT>LowerGlobalPass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1840,"</ISA_LIT>

<ISA_LIT> // Use a LowerablePass or LowerablePass2 to step through the codegeneration</ISA_LIT>

ISA_LIT> // Add pass to be run on the machine instruction selection</ISA_LIT>

<ISA_LIT>PassManagerBuilder builder ;</ISA_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1841,This code snippet defines a PassConfig class that takes in a TargetMachine object and a PassManagerBase object as parameters and inherits from the TargetPassConfig class. It likely implements methods for configuring passes to be used in TargetMachine specific optimizations.
LLVM,NVPTX,1842,"<ENDFS_LIT>This code snippet ends with a constructor being called for the TargetMachine32 class, which passes in several parameters such as a target, a triple, and various options and settings. It also sets a boolean value for whether this is being used for just-in-time (JIT) compilation. The next statement should likely be the closing curly brace for the constructor function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1843,"""<END>"""
LLVM,NVPTX,1844,The next statement is likely going to be another function or constructor call on the TargetMachine64 object or a call to one of its member functions.
LLVM,NVPTX,1845,"The next statement of this code snippet could be a declaration of a variable or function, or an assignment or conditional statement, depending on the purpose of the <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine64 class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1846,The next statement would likely add some other pass or transform to the `FunctionPassManager` before it is added to the `ModulePassManager`.
LLVM,NVPTX,1847,throw logic_error("addEarlyCSEOrGVNPass is not implemented yet");
LLVM,NVPTX,1848,"This code snippet will add a pass to either perform global value numbering or early common subexpression elimination, depending on the current optimization level."
LLVM,NVPTX,1849,"addFastScheduling ( RegAllocPass ) ; </s>

This snippet is defining a function in the PassConfig class called addFastRegAlloc and takes in a FunctionPass object called RegAllocPass. It asserts that RegAllocPass is not equal to NULL and then adds the PHI Elimination ID and Two Address Instruction Pass ID to the PassConfig. Finally, it calls the addFastScheduling function with the RegAllocPass as a parameter. The next statement could possibly be another function call or it could be the end of the snippet. It is impossible to predict without further context."
LLVM,NVPTX,1850,"The next statement will likely check if the ST variable has any image handles and, if it does not, add a pass to replace them using the create<ISA_LIT>ReplaceImageHandlesPass function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1851,This code snippet is adding a pass called "create<ISA_LIT>ReplaceImageHandlesPass" and returning the boolean value "false."
LLVM,NVPTX,1852,addPass ( createPostOrderFunctionAttrsPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1853,printAndVerify ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1854,addPass ( & MachineSchedulerID ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1855,Pass to the next function and print and verify the string literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,1856,"// <s> addPass ( create<ISA_LOAD>ElimPass ( ) , false ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1857,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be the closing curly brace, ""}""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1858,"</ISA_LIT>

<s> 
<MACHINE_LIT>TargetMachine64 :: finalize"
LLVM,NVPTX,1859,return PassConfig;
LLVM,NVPTX,1860,"</s>

 None. The line of code ends with a semicolon, indicating the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1861,"None, as the code snippet ends with a semicolon and the keyword ""return"" followed by ""nullptr"". It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or information."
LLVM,NVPTX,1862,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted. More context is needed to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1863,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be a closing statement or another function or method call.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1864,"}

// Initialize the NVVM reflect pass"
LLVM,NVPTX,1865,initialize<ISA_LIT>LowerGlobalsPass(PR);
LLVM,NVPTX,1866,"This code snippet defines a PassConfig class that inherits from the TargetPassConfig class. It takes in a TargetMachine pointer and a PassManagerBase reference as parameters and calls the constructor of the base class with these parameters. The next statement would likely be a declaration of the constructor function, including any parameters and curly braces for the function body."
LLVM,NVPTX,1867,The next statement is the opening curly brace for the PassConfig constructor function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1868,</
LLVM,NVPTX,1869,"""This code snippet defines a constructor for the TargetMachine32 class, which calls the constructor for the TargetMachine class with certain parameters and a boolean value."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1870,The code will now define the constructor for the Target Machine with the specified parameters.
LLVM,NVPTX,1871,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,1872,This code snippet creates a new instance of the TargetMachine class and initializes it.
LLVM,NVPTX,1873,"return <ISA_LIT>LoadISAType(sensorType) in after inserting<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine

ISA_LIT>TargetMachine :: ~ <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine ( ) {return <ISA_LIT>LoadISAType(sensorType) in after inserting<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine :: ~"
LLVM,NVPTX,1874,"It is likely that the next statement will be returning a value of false, as it is the last statement in the code snippet and there is no indication of any conditional statements or control structures."
LLVM,NVPTX,1875,"}</s>

The next statement predicts that the ""getObjFileLowering"" function will return the object file lowering based on the target based on the current target being used."
LLVM,NVPTX,1876,} NULL
LLVM,NVPTX,1877,It is likely that the next statement will involve using the returned value of Subtarget in some way.
LLVM,NVPTX,1878,"There is no additional code snippet provided, so it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1879,"After these three lines are executed, the code will likely proceed with initializing the LLVM target by setting up the target machine and MC asm info for the respective ISA."
LLVM,NVPTX,1880,end
LLVM,NVPTX,1881,The code will initialize the object "STTI" with the value of "TLInfo" and "VTTI" with the value of "TLInfo".
LLVM,NVPTX,1882,"The next statement would likely be the end of the constructor function, as indicated by the closing curly brace at the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1883,"<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine32(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1884,This code snippet defines an instance of the TargetMachine32 class and calls the constructor of the base TargetMachine class with the given parameters.
LLVM,NVPTX,1885,I cannot predict the next statement without more context. It depends on what the code is trying to achieve and what other statements are included in the code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1886,"The next statement will likely be the closing bracket for the constructor function, indicating the end of the code block."
LLVM,NVPTX,1887,addPass ( createLoopRotatePass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1888,"}</s>

<s>PassConfig :: addAddressSpaceInferencePasses ( ) { addPass ( createMem2RegPass ( ) ) ; }</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1889,An additional statement to disable a pass using the "create<ISA_LIT>LowerArgsPass" function on the "get<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine()" target machine.
LLVM,NVPTX,1890,"}

addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>RegAllocPass ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1891,"</s>

<s>Return true;}</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1892,<s> PM.run();
LLVM,NVPTX,1893,initialize<ISA_LIT>OptimizeVectorPass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1894,"// Add code here to initialize the target machine.

// Add code here to validate the target machine.

// Add code here to set up compilation pipeline.

// Create and return the target-specific object file writer.

CreateMCObjectWriter()"
LLVM,NVPTX,1895,"I'm sorry, I cannot accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is incomplete and missing necessary information."
LLVM,NVPTX,1896,return isa<TargetMachine64>(T);
LLVM,NVPTX,1897,"The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the constructor function for the TargetMachine64 class."
LLVM,NVPTX,1898,"The next statement will likely be the end of the function and a return statement, possibly returning a boolean value."
LLVM,NVPTX,1899,The next statement will likely be an opening bracket ({) to start a block of code.
LLVM,NVPTX,1900,The next statement will most likely declare a variable for the target machine's exception handling information.
LLVM,NVPTX,1901,The next statement will most likely be a curly bracket indicating the start of a code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,1902,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement or a function definition."
LLVM,NVPTX,1903,"</s>

The next statement might be ""return a pointer to the data layout."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1904,error: 'FrameLowering' was not declared in this scope
LLVM,NVPTX,1905,"This code snippet is incomplete, so it is not possible to predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,1906,"}

The code snippet returns a pointer to the InstrInfo variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1907,"</s>

It is likely to return the instruction information for the given ISA."
LLVM,NVPTX,1908,"""Returns a pointer to a ManagedStringPool object."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1909,return &ManagedStrPool;
LLVM,NVPTX,1910,"return std :: make_pair ( II -> getArgOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , llvm :: ADDRESS_SPACE_PRIVATE ) ;
default: return std :: make_pair ( II -> getArgOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , llvm :: ADDRESS_SPACE_LOCAL ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1911,This function returns a pointer to the RegisterInfo of a given instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,1912,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without further context or the code snippet itself.
LLVM,NVPTX,1913,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,1914,Return the selected virtual const TargetSelectionDAGInfo method for the current code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1915,<s> return subtarget;
LLVM,NVPTX,1916,"</s>

<s> return subtarget; </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1917,"</s>>


The next statement will likely be a ""return"" statement, where the value of ""TLInfo"" is being cast to a <ISA_LIT>TargetLowering*>, possibly for the purpose of modifying the data in some way."
LLVM,NVPTX,1918,nullptr
LLVM,NVPTX,1919,"}</s>

It is likely that the next statement will include information on how the code should transform vectors using the VTTI object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1920,addPass ( createModuleCleanupPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1921,addPass ( createLowerSwitchPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1922,PM.add( <s>createDeadCodeEliminationPass())
LLVM,NVPTX,1923,The code adds a pass to the PM variable using the createNVVMReflectPass method.
LLVM,NVPTX,1924,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1925,"return new <ISA_LIT>TargetPassConfig(this, PM);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1926,This code snippet creates a new PassConfig object with the current object and PM as parameters.
LLVM,NVPTX,1927,"at the end, it will return false"
LLVM,NVPTX,1928,initialize<ISA_LIT>LowerVectorPass ( PR );
LLVM,NVPTX,1929,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,1930,Ret += <END>
LLVM,NVPTX,1931,return CodeModel :: getN
LLVM,NVPTX,1932,"This code snippet adds passes to the PassConfig, then adds passes from the TargetPassConfig, and finally adds a generic to NVVM pass."
LLVM,NVPTX,1933,"</s>

This code snippet adds a post register allocation pass called 'ISA_LITPrologEpilogPass' to the PassConfig."
LLVM,NVPTX,1934,"</s>

<s>runPasses ( MFunction, PredicateC, PostProPredicates ) ;</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,1935,"}

TargetIRAnalysis <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine :: getTargetIRAnalysis ( ) { // code to be filled in later  }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1936,"}

The next statement of this code snippet will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1937,initializeNVVMPrintModulePass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1938,"}</s>

This code snippet is initializing a PassRegistry for the <ISA_LIT>Target machine and calling the initializeNVVMReflectPass function. It is likely that the next statement will involve registering this PassRegistry for use in the target machine."
LLVM,NVPTX,1939,It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context.
LLVM,NVPTX,1940,"The next statement would be ""return TargetLowering;"", as this seems to be a function that returns a pointer to a TargetLowering object."
LLVM,NVPTX,1941,addPass(createMachineCodeAnalysis());
LLVM,NVPTX,1942,addPass ( createUnrollLoopPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1943,"If the optimization level is not 'Aggressive', add the next pass, which is createNX27Pass."
LLVM,NVPTX,1944,"<staking

Valid syntax is correct"
LLVM,NVPTX,1945,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict the next statement without seeing the code snippet. Please provide more information for me to make a prediction."
LLVM,NVPTX,1946,"I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by ""predict the next statement."" Can you provide more context or information?"
LLVM,NVPTX,1947,"""TargetMachine32 object has been created with the specified parameters."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1948,"The next statement will likely involve setting up a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine class, with parameters such as the target, target machine type, CPU, floating point unit, target options, relocation model, code model, optimization level, and a boolean value representing whether or not the target machine is a 32-bit machine."
LLVM,NVPTX,1949,"The next statement will be the body of the constructor for the TargetMachine64 class, which initializes the superclass TargetMachine with the given parameters."
LLVM,NVPTX,1950,The next line of code could potentially be an initialization or assignment statement to set the value of a variable for the TargetMachine64 object.
LLVM,NVPTX,1951,addPass( create<ISA_LIT>LowerGlobalOpPass() );
LLVM,NVPTX,1952,"return false;
}

There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,1953,"We cannot accurately predict the next statement without knowing what the ISA_LIT variable is set to. Each of the mentioned functions is being initialized with the variable PR as a parameter, but without knowing the value of ISA_LIT, we cannot predict what the next statement will be."
LLVM,NVPTX,1954,initialize<ISA_LIT>FinalizePass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1955,The code will initialize a new instance of LLVMTargetMachine with the given parameters and then create a new instance of TargetObjectFile using the make_unique method. It will then use the Target and Subtarget information to initialize the object.
LLVM,NVPTX,1956,addPass (create<ISA_LIT>PrintAnalysisPass());
LLVM,NVPTX,1957,"</s>

Ret += <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1958,createGenericToNVVMPass();
LLVM,NVPTX,1959,"addPass ( createEarlyCSEPass ( ) ) ;>

createNVVMReflectPass ( ST . getSmVersion ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1960,The next statement will have a return type of TargetTransformInfo and will be accessing the TargetMachine class to get information about a specific function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1961,TargetTransformInfo <ISA_LIT> F.getTargetTransformInfo() const
LLVM,NVPTX,1962,"The next statement would likely be to add another pass, potentially in the same format as the previous statement, to continue optimizing the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,1963,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the code snippet and the context in which it is being used.
LLVM,NVPTX,1964,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the input values and purposes of the functions and variables involved.
LLVM,NVPTX,1965,initialize<ISA_LIT>LowerGlobalAllocPass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1966,"addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>AddressSpaceAliasAnalysis ( ) ) ; }</s>

if ( OptimizeMemoryLayout ) { addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>MemoryLayoutOptimizationPass ( ) ) ; } else { addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>InstructionCombiningPass ( ) ) ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,1967,addPass ( create<SimpleInlinerPass> ( ) )
LLVM,NVPTX,1968,initialize<ISA_LIT>LowerBitSetsPass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1969,initialize <ISA_LIT>LowerGlobalToLocalPass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1970,"}, Override)
 PB.registerPipelineIRTransformationCallback([](StringRef PassName, ModulePassManager &MPM, ArrayRef<PassBuilder::PipelineElement>) {if (PassName == <STR_LIT>) {MPM.addPass(NVVMReflectPass()); return true;}}, Override)"
LLVM,NVPTX,1971,initializeAsmPrinterPass(* PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
LLVM,NVPTX,1972,perform register allocation and then add the StrongPHIEliminationID pass
LLVM,NVPTX,1973,addPass(createTargetTransformInfoWrapperPass())
LLVM,NVPTX,1974,disablePass ( & TargetIndependentCodeInserterID ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1975,<INT_LIT> }
LLVM,NVPTX,1976,"Most likely, the code snippet will continue by returning the value stored in the variable ""DataLayout""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1977,Initialize the NVVMReflectPass and GenericToNVVMPass using the PassRegistry.
LLVM,NVPTX,1978,"The code will continue to construct an instance of a <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine class, initializing the remaining member variables."
LLVM,NVPTX,1979,There is no next statement in this code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,1980,"// RegisterTargetMachine<<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine32> X2(The<ISA_LIT>Target32);
RegisterTargetMachine<<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine64> Y2(The<ISA_LIT>Target64);"
LLVM,NVPTX,1981,initialize<ISA_LIT>TailMergingPass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1982,"}</s>

The next statement is:

Set the value of the variable drvInterface to ""<STR_LIT>"" if the operating system specified in the Triple object created from the target triple TT is NVCL, otherwise set it to ""<STR_LIT>""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1983,This code snippet adds an analysis pass to the pass manager that creates a BasicTargetTransformInfoPass.
LLVM,NVPTX,1984,"The statement will likely continue the initialization of the TargetMachine object, potentially setting some additional parameters or calling a function."
LLVM,NVPTX,1985,No next statement prediction possible.
LLVM,NVPTX,1986,"}</s><Working on setting up Drive

""Next, the code will check the operating system and set the driver interface based on the result."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1987,"The next statement will likely call the constructor of the parent class, LLVMTargetMachine, passing in several parameters including the TargetMachine variable, a computed data layout, the target triple, a CPU name, a feature string, target options, a relocation model, a code model, the code generation optimization level, and the is64bit variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,1988,"}</s>

Next, it is expected that a target pass configuration will be added."
LLVM,NVPTX,1989,The next statement is likely to be related to initializing the object or setting some parameters for the TargetMachine class.
LLVM,NVPTX,1990,"""The next command is to initialize the MIPS target machine by passing the specified T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL parameters and setting the is64bit flag."""
LLVM,NVPTX,1991,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted. Please provide additional information for a more accurate prediction.
LLVM,NVPTX,1992,The next statement is likely to be the closing bracket for the constructor function.
LLVM,NVPTX,1993,<s> initialize<ISA_LIT>EraseUnusedFunctionsPass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1994,TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();
LLVM,NVPTX,1995,"disablePass ( & MachineCopyPropagationID ) ;

disablePass ( & PostRAID ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,1996,">
The next statement is probably going to be ""addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>DeadStoreEliminationPass ( ) ) ;""."
LLVM,NVPTX,1997,addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>VectorFunctionSelectionPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,1998,addPass( create<ISA_LIT>ReloadForPassesPass() );
LLVM,NVPTX,1999,"}

""// Register the <ISA_LIT>Target32 and <ISA_LIT>Target64 target machines."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2000,addPass (createNVVMReflectPass(ST.getSmVersion()));
LLVM,NVPTX,2001,addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>EntryPointPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2002,initialize<ISA_LIT>DeadCodeEliminationPass ( PR ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2003,"} 

If getOptLevel() is not None, add an EarlyCSEOrGVNPass."
LLVM,NVPTX,2004,addPass (createNVVMMetadataPass(ST.getSmVersion())) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2005,No further statement can be predicted as this code snippet does not contain any conditionals or loops. It is possible that the code continues with additional function calls or other operations using the PassRegistry object.
LLVM,NVPTX,2006,disablePass ( & NVVMReflectPassID ); <return>
LLVM,NVPTX,2007,addPass(createGenericTypeOutputPass());
LLVM,NVPTX,2008,addPass ( createPrintModulePass ( ... ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2009,addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>AMDGPUCFGStructurizerPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2010,"If the optLevel is not None, the next statement will be to add the pass to create the LowerArgsPass with the TargetMachine. If the optLevel is None, it will add the IR passes."
LLVM,NVPTX,2011,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,2012,"}

The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2013,return getSubtargetImpl()->getIntrinsicInfo();
LLVM,NVPTX,2014,It will return the instruction information of the subtarget implementation.
LLVM,NVPTX,2015,"</s

<CODE_LIT> InstrInfo * getInstrInfo ( ) const override ;</CODE_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2016,"</s>

<s>return the ManagedStrPool;</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2017,"""""""

The next statement will likely be a comment or documentation explaining the purpose of the getManagedStrPool function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2018,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context or purpose of the code snippet. Additional information is needed in order to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2019,It is not possible to predict the next statement based on this code snippet without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,2020,It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,2021,"</s>

return &Subtarget;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2022,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,2023,the next statement of this code snippet would be <\s>.
LLVM,NVPTX,2024,"TargetLowering *getTargetLowering() const { </s>

The next statement will likely be a closing curly bracket to end the getTargetLowering function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2025,"DwarfLocSection = new <ISA_LIT>Section ( MCSection :: SV_ELF , SectionKind :: getMetadata ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2026,The next statement is creating a new section for the DwarfGnuEHFrameSection.
LLVM,NVPTX,2027,"</s>

The code snippet is resetting several sections related to debugging information in an program."
LLVM,NVPTX,2028,"}</s>

There will be a closing curly brace."
LLVM,NVPTX,2029,"The next statement will be a return statement followed by the return type of the function, such as ""return nullptr;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2030,return MCSection::getReadOnly();
LLVM,NVPTX,2031,"This code snippet defines a function called ""getSectionForConstant"" that takes in parameters for a DataLayout, SectionKind, Constant, and Alignment, and overrides a virtual function from a base class."
LLVM,NVPTX,2032,"The next statement will probably involve the use of some of the parameters, such as defining variables or calling functions."
LLVM,NVPTX,2033,return new TargetObjectFile();
LLVM,NVPTX,2034,"// Perform additional initialization here.

return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2035,"DwarfDebugStrSection = new <ISA_LIT>Section ( MCSection :: SV_ELF , SectionKind :: getMetadata ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2036,"<e>

 There will be a new code snippet with different section names and nullptr assignments."
LLVM,NVPTX,2037,The next statement in the code snippet may be the termination of the code or the start of a new code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,2038,"return dyn_cast_or_null<MCSection>(SectionForGlobal<GlobalObject>(GO, SectionOf<C>(C, Align)));"
LLVM,NVPTX,2039,"}</s>

This code snippet does not contain a language model, so it is not possible to predict the next statement. It appears to be defining a method that returns a Constant, but without context it is impossible to determine the specific action that will be taken."
LLVM,NVPTX,2040,"DebugSection = new <ISA_LIT>Section ( MCSection :: SV_ELF , SectionKind :: getDebug ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2041,"}</s>

This code snippet is defining a function called ""getExplicitSectionGlobal"" that takes four parameters: GV which is a pointer to a GlobalValue, Kind which is a variable of type SectionKind, Mang which is a pointer to a Mangler, and TM which is a const reference to a TargetMachine. The function will return the value of the variable DataSection, which is of type MCSection."
LLVM,NVPTX,2042,"}</s>

The next statement will likely involve manipulating or accessing the ReadOnlySection in some way, such as adding or removing elements from it. Alternatively, it may involve returning a different section if certain conditions are met."
LLVM,NVPTX,2043,"DwarfRangesSection = new <ISA_LIT>Section ( MCSection :: SV_ELF , SectionKind :: getMetadata ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2044,"</s>



The next statement is most likely a code block or function definition."
LLVM,NVPTX,2045,">

</ISA_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2046,We cannot predict the next statement as the code snippet does not provide enough information.
LLVM,NVPTX,2047,Delete DwarfStrSection ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2048,No further statements.
LLVM,NVPTX,2049,"}
This code snippet does not have any remaining statements."
LLVM,NVPTX,2050,"}</s>

The next statement would be ""}"" to close the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2051,"This code snippet overrides the ""getExplicitSectionGlobal"" function and specifies that it takes in four parameters: GV, Kind, Mang, and TM. It then returns a MCSection pointer."
LLVM,NVPTX,2052,"}

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. However, it is likely that the function will return the section for a given constant, based on the specified SectionKind parameter, and override the default ReadOnlySection value."
LLVM,NVPTX,2053,"}

The next statement will end the function override and return the ReadOnlySection."
LLVM,NVPTX,2054,RelocationTableSection = nullptr ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2055,"The words 'SubSection'

'OS << <STR_LIT> ; PropagateAttribute ( SubSection ) ;'"
LLVM,NVPTX,2056,"</S>

One possible prediction is:

if (Section == <STR_LIT>) {
  return;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2057,This code snippet adds a Directive to the end of a DwarfFiles vector.
LLVM,NVPTX,2058,s> DwarfFiles.emplace_back(Directive);
LLVM,NVPTX,2059,"}

The code snippet will continue to loop through the data and print out the raw text corresponding to each chunk."
LLVM,NVPTX,2060,"The next statement would be:
if (Section == FI -> getDwarfGnuPubTypesSection ()) return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2061,"}


Return Section == FI -> getDwarfGnuPubNamesSection ( ) || Section == FI -> getDwarfGnuPubTypesSection ( ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2062,"S.EmitLabel ( nullptr ) }
<SRC_APPEND>EmitLabel

MCTargetStreamer::SRC_APPEND(EmitLabel, nullptr) {S.EmitLabel (nullptr)}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2063,"The next statement will likely define the class constructor for the TargetStreamer class, which will take in a parameter of type MCStreamer and call the constructor for the MCTargetStreamer class, passing in the same parameter. This suggests that the TargetStreamer class inherits from the MCTargetStreamer class and uses its constructor to initialize its own members."
LLVM,NVPTX,2064,"""getStreamer().EmitRawText(S.data());"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2065,"FI->printSection(OS, *getStreamer().getContext().getAsmInfo(), FI->getTargetTriple(), Section, Subsection);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2066,"</s>

Section->PrintSwitchToSection(*getStreamer().getContext().getAsmInfo(), FI->getTargetTriple(), OS, SubSection);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2067,"assert ( ! CurSection && <STR_LIT> ) ; }

The next statement of the code snippet is ""if ( SubSection->getKind () == MCExpr::SEK_DwarfOp )""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2068,"}

The code will check if the current streamer has any sections, and if it does, the raw text will be emitted."
LLVM,NVPTX,2069,"""Closing dwarf file directives and printing string literal to OS stream."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2070,"</s>


<s> // Code for outputting directives to the target's Dwarf file </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2071,"64;

64;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2072,"for

(unsigned J = 0; J < MaxLen; ++J) {
    Str.push_back(Data[J]);
}
Streamer.EmitAssemblerFlag(TAI.AssemblerDialect);
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2073,"}

OS << <STR_LIT> ;

Section->PrintSwitchToSection(*getStreamer().getContext().getAsmInfo(),
getStreamer().getContext().getTargetTriple(),
OS, SubSection);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2074,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement, closing brackets, or a call to another method."
LLVM,NVPTX,2075,"</s>

It is possible that the code will output a raw string."
LLVM,NVPTX,2076,"OS << * It ; } }

The code snippet creates a for loop that iterates over <NUM_LIT> to NumChunks."
LLVM,NVPTX,2077,"It != End ; ++ It ) { 

const char *Temp = reinterpret_cast<const char*>(It);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2078,"</s>
<s>return 0;</s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2079,"}

for ( const std::string & S : DwarfFiles )
getStreamer ( ) . emitRawText ( S ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2080,"</s>

The next statement may be a return statement that calculates the cost of an arithmetic instruction based on the provided arguments."
LLVM,NVPTX,2081,"The next statement is likely going to be a closing curly brace, as it seems like the code snippet is defining a function and this is a common way to end function definitions."
LLVM,NVPTX,2082,".

None"
LLVM,NVPTX,2083,}
LLVM,NVPTX,2084,"</s>

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,2085,"// Check if the chain size is less than or equal to the alignment
if (ChainSizeInBytes <= Alignment) {

// Check if the address space is valid
if (isAddressSpaceValid(AddrSpace)) {

// Return true if both conditions are satisfied
return true;
}
}


// Otherwise, return false
return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2086,return Alignment * AddrSpace >= ChainSizeInBytes;
LLVM,NVPTX,2087,"It is difficult to predict with certainty without more context, but it is possible that the next statement could involve the switch statement selecting a case and executing the corresponding code block. Alternatively, it could involve the code accessing the value of LT or performing a calculation using the values of LT and ISD."
LLVM,NVPTX,2088,"The next statement will likely be an ""if"" statement, where the conditional checks if the second element of LT is equal to a <STR_LIT> type, and if so, executes a return statement with a <NUM_LIT> * LT.first value. If the conditional is not met, it will return BaseT::getArithmeticInstrCost as in the default case."
LLVM,NVPTX,2089,PP will contain the preferences for peeling the given loop.
LLVM,NVPTX,2090,"return getScalarTy ( * getDataLayout ( ) ) .
K.getSizeInBits();"
LLVM,NVPTX,2091,UP . Debug = false ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2092,"if (I) {
    Some(I)
} else {
    None
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2093,return SimplifiedSpecialCase;
LLVM,NVPTX,2094,This code snippet is defining a function called SimplifyAction with two parameters: SpecialCase Special and FtzRequirementTy FtzReq. The function is setting the value of Special to the passed in value for Special and the value of FtzRequirement to the passed in value for FtzReq. The function will then perform an action based on these values.
LLVM,NVPTX,2095,"params has $i_temmY = TLI ( <PERECENTS>  InstructionMachineCleanup),

I expect the next statement to be a declaration or initialization of a variable or object related to the TTIImpl class."
LLVM,NVPTX,2096,The next statement is a closing curly brace ("}").
LLVM,NVPTX,2097,return FtzRequirement;
LLVM,NVPTX,2098,"<COMMA>GotoState(MOPTIIASSCC)

This code snippet does not provide enough information to predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2099,"return { Instruction :: FDiv , FTZ_Any

It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet does not include the next case statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2100,"In the next statement, the code will check if the 'SimpleTy' of the 'second' variable in the 'LT' data structure is equal to <STR_LIT>, and if so, return the product of <NUM_LIT> and 'first' variable in the 'LT' data structure."
LLVM,NVPTX,2101,"return Expensive <STR_LIT>

The next statement would return the cost for an expensive instruction with type ""STR_LIT."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2102,"<STR_LIT> 

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2103,The next statement is "if ( Action . FtzRequirement != FTZ_Any )".
LLVM,NVPTX,2104,"return getGlobalObjectInitType(AS) != GlobalObjectInitType::Undef;
}

This function returns the result of comparing the global object initialization type to GlobalObjectInitType::Undef, indicating whether or not it is possible for the global to have a non-undefined initializer in the specified address space."
LLVM,NVPTX,2105,A potential next statement could be to define the function or to call it within another function.
LLVM,NVPTX,2106,return new <ISA_LIT>TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass(TM);
LLVM,NVPTX,2107,"</s>


This function checks if the given ID matches the ID of TargetTransformInfo, and if it does, it returns a pointer to the current TargetTransformInfo object. Otherwise, it returns a pointer to the current object."
LLVM,NVPTX,2108,"Analysis <br>

Passing by reference"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,2109,AU.setPreservesAll ();
LLVM,NVPTX,2110,The next statement will likely involve calculating the cost of an arithmetic instruction with the given parameters.
LLVM,NVPTX,2111,"return TargetTransformInfo::getArithmeticInstrCost(Opcode, Ty, Opd1Info, Opd2Info, Opd1PropInfo, Opd2PropInfo);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2112,"return hasBranchDivergence;
}

This code snippet defines a boolean function called ""hasBranchDivergence"" that returns the value of a variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,2113,return true
LLVM,NVPTX,2114,It is not possible to predict the next statement as the provided code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information about the program's logic.
LLVM,NVPTX,2115,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,2116,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,2117,We cannot predict the next statement without more context or information. The code snippet given is incomplete and does not provide enough information to make a prediction.
LLVM,NVPTX,2118,It is not possible to make a prediction without more information or the context of the code snippet. The next statement could be anything depending on what comes after the semicolon.
LLVM,NVPTX,2119,The next statement would most likely be a return statement containing the variable or expression that represents the number of registers.
LLVM,NVPTX,2120,"}</s>

The next statement would likely include a calculation or operation that determines the number of registers based on the input parameter of a bool value for Vector. It could also include a return statement that returns the result of the calculation or operation. For example:

return Vector ? 16 : 8 ; // Returns 16 if Vector is true, otherwise returns 8"
LLVM,NVPTX,2121,The program will return the value of a numerical literal.
LLVM,NVPTX,2122,UP.Partial is set to true and UP.Runtime is set to true.
LLVM,NVPTX,2123,"""The 'Partial' and 'Runtime' values of the UnrollingPreferences variable will both be set to true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2124,"return (getMaximumVectorMemoryAccessSize(AddrSpace) >= ChainSizeInBytes) &&
        (Alignment % ChainSizeInBytes == 0) &&
        (getMaximumVectorLoadAlignment(AddrSpace) >= Alignment);
        
��A boolean value will be returned indicating whether or not the conditions of the 'if' statement are met.��"
LLVM,NVPTX,2125,"Assuming the code snippet is part of a larger function, the next statement could be to define the isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain function or to declare any necessary variables. Otherwise, if this is the last line of the current function, the execution will return the output of the isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2126,"</s>

</s> return ChainSizeInBytes == 0 && Alignment != 0 && AddrSpace != 0;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2127,"return true ; } }

The next statement would be ""}"" to close the switch statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2128,The code snippet will declare a new variable called "encoded" of type "char" with a length of <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,NVPTX,2129,temp64 . y = <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2130,The next statement is likely an operation being performed on the mutex lock.
LLVM,NVPTX,2131,"If the condition evaluates to true, the cacheAnnotationFromMD() function will be called with the parameters m and gv."
LLVM,NVPTX,2132,"The next statement will be to check if the property (prop) can be found in the cached annotation for the given item (gv) and the current method (m). If it cannot be found, the function will return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,2133,"=""return(x & ( x < x < x < )""

the function will return the result of the expression ""x & ( x < x < x < )"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2134,"It would be the end of the code snippet, as there are no other statements to be executed."
LLVM,NVPTX,2135,"</s>

<s>} </s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2136,"</s>

NVVMAnnotation t(findOneNVVMAnnotation(&F, sits->getName(), y));"
LLVM,NVPTX,2137,"</s>

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,2138,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing what the parameter "x" is or what the function "findOneNVVMAnnotation" does. Additional context is needed to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2139,"""return true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2140,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,2141,"return Static::getReqNTIDx(Internal, x ) }

The next statement would be an ending curly bracket."
LLVM,NVPTX,2142,The next statement would be the closing curly brace for the function.
LLVM,NVPTX,2143,"</s>

One possible option is:

 - Return 'null' as the value of the 'findOneNVVMAnnotation' function with arguments 'F', '<STR_LIT>' and 'z'."
LLVM,NVPTX,2144,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict code snippets as it may vary depending on the specific implementation and context. Please provide more information or context for me to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2145,return val["sampler_name"].asString();
LLVM,NVPTX,2146,The next statement could be an error message or a continuation of the code that checks for the next condition.
LLVM,NVPTX,2147,"Assuming there are no errors, the next statement would be to return a string containing the name of the value."
LLVM,NVPTX,2148,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and the code that comes after this line. It could be a series of additional commands, a conditional statement, or the end of the function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2149,"-

// Returns true if the value is an image, false otherwise."
LLVM,NVPTX,2150,"The next statement is likely to ask for a value or variable to be passed into the functions isImageReadOnly, isImageWriteOnly, and isImageReadWrite in order to return a boolean value."
LLVM,NVPTX,2151,The next statement will be "}" to end the if statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2152,"This code snippet checks if the given value is a read-only image by first checking if it is an argument and then checking if it is annotated as a non-volatile value in the given function. If it is, then the function returns true, otherwise it returns false."
LLVM,NVPTX,2153,The next statement would be something like "annot.push_back(func->getAnnotation())" where we push the parent function's annotation index onto the "annot" vector.
LLVM,NVPTX,2154,"}

It is likely that the code will check if the value is contained within the specified annotation and return true if it is."
LLVM,NVPTX,2155,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement, or a conditional statement to check if the value is write-only."
LLVM,NVPTX,2156,"""return (x == 0);"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2157,There is likely a missing closing bracket at the end of this code snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,2158,"<STR_LIT > <STR_LIT>

No prediction can be made as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information to determine the next statement. The code snippet ends with a semicolon, so the next statement could be any valid statement in the program."
LLVM,NVPTX,2159,The next statement could be an assertion that the value of "func" is not null.
LLVM,NVPTX,2160,auto iter =
LLVM,NVPTX,2161,"</s>

else {
    return false;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2162,The snippet will return the BasicBlock's data as output.
LLVM,NVPTX,2163,"The next statement would be:
elem->getOperand(1); // Getting the second operand of the MDNode"
LLVM,NVPTX,2164,return tmp;
LLVM,NVPTX,2165,"<s>

{s>
// code block } <s>"
LLVM,NVPTX,2166,<NUM_LIT> 0
LLVM,NVPTX,2167,"cacheAnnotationFromMD ( m , gv ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2168,">

The code will check if the annotationCache has a property matching the given string, and if it does, it will return true and set the vector of unsigned values to the cached annotation."
LLVM,NVPTX,2169,return false
LLVM,NVPTX,2170,"} } } }

The code snippet will not output any statement and the program will terminate."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,2171,"The next statement could be a return statement that returns the value of (bool llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation(&F, llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MAXNTID_X], x))."
LLVM,NVPTX,2172,"It is likely that the next statement will involve the use of the variable ""x"", possibly for comparison or assignment purposes."
LLVM,NVPTX,2173,"The next statement will return the value of the bool expression, which is determined by the result of the llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2174,The code will return the maximum number of threads per dimension for a given LLVM function along with its corresponding thread ID.
LLVM,NVPTX,2175,The next statement would be a closing curly brace ending the function or code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,2176,There is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2177,None; the code snippet does not contain a statement after the "return" keyword.
LLVM,NVPTX,2178,"This code snippet will return the parent of the given value (v), while also checking if it is a Function, Instruction, or BasicBlock."
LLVM,NVPTX,2179,"If the function F has a valid Return instruction, then x will be set to the required NTIDx value."
LLVM,NVPTX,2180,"</s>

The code is returning the result of the findOneNVVMAnnotation function, which takes the current function (F) and the name of a property (PROPERTY_REQNTID_Y) as parameters, and assigns the result to the variable y."
LLVM,NVPTX,2181,"<\s>

 ""Returns the corresponding y-id for the provided function F."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2182,It returns a boolean value indicating if the next thread ID is required and assigns it to the variable z.
LLVM,NVPTX,2183,> "returns if the function and unsigned z exists and how many are required."
LLVM,NVPTX,2184,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. The code snippet could be part of a larger code block that performs additional logic or calculations before returning a final result.
LLVM,NVPTX,2185,"bool global = ( func == NULL )


return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2186,There are no more executable statements</s>
LLVM,NVPTX,2187,"}
return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2188,"}</s>

The if statement checks if the <NUM_LIT> and <STR_LIT> annotations are found and if so, the function returns true."
LLVM,NVPTX,2189,"return </s>

True"
LLVM,NVPTX,2190,"The code will check if the annotation value is equal to the numeric literal <NUM_LIT> and if the assertion is true. If so, it will return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,2191,"( * annotationCache ) [ m ]
The code snippet is performing a series of operations on a named metadata node and storing the results in a temporary variable called tmp. The next statement will likely involve using the contents of tmp for some purpose or checking its values."
LLVM,NVPTX,2192,"</s>

if ( ( * annotationCache ) . find ( m ) != ( * annotationCache ) . end ( ) ) tmp1 [ gv ] = std :: move ( tmp ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2193,"</s>


The code will check if the module is in the annotation cache, and if not, it will call the cacheAnnotationFromMD function to add it to the cache."
LLVM,NVPTX,2194,"The next statement will check if the value of the key ""prop"" in the annotation cache at index [m][gv] equals the end of the annotation cache at index [m][gv]. If it does, the function will return false. If the values are not equal, the function will assign the value of the key ""prop"" at index [m][gv] at the <NUM_LIT> index to the variable ""retval""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2195,"}
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2196,This code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to predict what the next statement would be without knowing what the variables "val" and "STR_LIT" refer to. It is likely that the next statement would involve using these variables in some way.
LLVM,NVPTX,2197,"It is likely that the next statement will involve using the getName function from the Value class to retrieve the name of a texture, possibly for use in the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,2198,This code snippet will return the name of the variable "val".
LLVM,NVPTX,2199,"6

 }global_val_annot_t tmp1 ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2200,"tmp1 . insert ( std :: pair < const GlobalValue * , Annotation * > ( gv , tmp ) ) ; ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] = tmp1 ; }

Insert new key-value pair to annotationCache dictionary."
LLVM,NVPTX,2201,"}

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2202,The next statement would be to return false.
LLVM,NVPTX,2203,FALSE
LLVM,NVPTX,2204,"} 

if (x > 0) { return true; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,2205,"}

""The code will check if the id is equal to any of the specified string literals and if it is, it will return true."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2206,"}</s>

Else statement"
LLVM,NVPTX,2207,}
LLVM,NVPTX,2208,"""Else, if the prop is not found in the annotation cache for gv, then return false. Otherwise, set the return value as the annotation cache value for m, gv, and prop."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2209,"Else cacheAnnotationFromMD ( m , gv ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2210,The code will return false.
LLVM,NVPTX,2211,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,2212,annot.clear();
LLVM,NVPTX,2213,"if (!func) {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2214,"}</s>

The code will check if the entity is not null and, if it is not null, it will continue to the next step in the loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,2215,"tmp1 [ gv ] = std ::move( tmp ) 

if ( ( * annotationCache ) . find ( m ) != ( * annotationCache ) . end ( ) ) {
  ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] = std :: move ( tmp ) ;
} else {
  global_val_annot_t tmp1 ;
  tmp1 [ gv ] = std ::move( tmp ) ;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2216,"Any data }

There is no prediction possible as the snippet is incomplete and lacks necessary information to make an accurate prediction."
LLVM,NVPTX,2217,"align = v ; } } } } 

The next statement would be a closing curly brace that ends the ""if"" statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2218,"if ( i < <NUM_LIT> && md -> getOperand ( i ) != <PTR_LIT> ) {

The next statement will likely involve a conditional check using the ""!= "" operator."
LLVM,NVPTX,2219,assert ( Val && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2220,"This code snippet appears to be traversing through a list of values, and checking if they are of certain types. If they are, it continues to perform some operation on them. The next statement could be another conditional statement, or it could be the end of the loop and the return statement at the end. The exact statement cannot be predicted without knowing the values of the variables and the logic behind the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,2221,The next statement is: if(common == <NUM_LIT>) return PN;
LLVM,NVPTX,2222,"( * annotationCache ) [ m ] = std :: move ( tmp1 ) ;


The next statement could potentially be an ""if"" statement or a ""return"" statement, depending on the values of the variables used in the previous statements. It could also be another assignment statement or a function call."
LLVM,NVPTX,2223,"Function *F =getParentFunction(Value *v, char*blockName)

F will be declared as the parent function of the given value and blockName."
LLVM,NVPTX,2224,The function will return if the value of F is not present.
LLVM,NVPTX,2225,print(I->getName());
LLVM,NVPTX,2226,"if (I != nullptr) {

    I->dump();
    
} else {

    std::cout << ""Error: Instruction not found."" << std::endl;
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2227,"}

The next statement would be:

closing curly brace (})"
LLVM,NVPTX,2228,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be predicted. It may contain additional code or end with a closing bracket.
LLVM,NVPTX,2229,"}

The next statement would likely be another if statement or a closing bracket to end the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,2230,"Perform the function ""cacheAnnotationFromMD(m, gv)"" on the input parameters m and gv."
LLVM,NVPTX,2231,"The statement after this code snippet will return the value stored in the <NUM_LIT> index of the annotation cache for the variables 'm', 'gv', and 'prop'."
LLVM,NVPTX,2232,"}

If the [prop] annotation is not found, the function will return false."
LLVM,NVPTX,2233,"}>

if ( ( v >> <NUM_LIT> ) < index ) { return false ; }"
LLVM,NVPTX,2234,"</s>

""Performing operations on instruction I."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2235,<s>x++;
LLVM,NVPTX,2236,"return ( llvm :: findOneNVVMAnnotation ( & F , llvm :: PropertyAnnotationNames [ llvm :: PROPERTY_MAXNTID_Z ] , z ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2237,return true; //assuming y will be changed to the maximum NTID y value
LLVM,NVPTX,2238,"</s>

The next statement could be: ""if (F.hasFnAttribute(""maxNTIDz"")) {""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2239,"</s>

The function will return the value of the annotation associated with the maximum number of threads in the z-dimension for the given function."
LLVM,NVPTX,2240,"return ( llvm:: findOneNVVMAnnotation( &F, llvm:: PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MAXSM], x ) );"
LLVM,NVPTX,2241,There will be a return statement containing a boolean value.
LLVM,NVPTX,2242,"Next, a condition is given using the keyword ""if"" followed by a function ""dyn_cast"" with the variable, ""v"" passed as a parameter. The code snippet will only return a BasicBlock if the condition is met."
LLVM,NVPTX,2243,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The code snippet could continue with an if/else statement or a different type of control flow statement. It all depends on the rest of the specific program.
LLVM,NVPTX,2244,"</s>

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2245,"</s>

The return value of the function is the result of calling the findOneNVVMAnnotation function with two arguments - a pointer to the function F and a property name PROPERTY_REQNTID_Z, followed by a variable ""z""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2246,"The next statement is most likely a return statement, followed by a closing curly brace and possibly a semicolon."
LLVM,NVPTX,2247,return val.getName();
LLVM,NVPTX,2248,The next statement would likely involve evaluating the expression and returning a boolean value based on the outcome.
LLVM,NVPTX,2249,"}
The next statement could be:

return false;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2250,"for (auto it = annot.begin(); it != annot.end(); it++) {
    if (*it == 0) {
        std :: cout << ""Parameter is read-only."" << std :: endl;
    } else {
        std :: cout << ""Parameter is read-write."" << std :: endl;
    }
}

It looks like the next statement will be ""}"" to close the ""for"" loop."
LLVM,NVPTX,2251,There may be additional code following this snippet.
LLVM,NVPTX,2252,"The code will check if F's calling conversion is equal to PTX_Kernel and if not, it will return false. If the conversion is equal to PTX_Kernel, the code will return the value of x."
LLVM,NVPTX,2253,"}

False"
LLVM,NVPTX,2254,"This code snippet checks if the variable ""id"" is equal to a string literal, and then returns a boolean value depending on the result of the check."
LLVM,NVPTX,2255,The next statement could potentially be a closing curly brace to end the if statement or continue on to another block of code.
LLVM,NVPTX,2256,The code will return true if the annotation for gv is equal to the value of NUM_LIT and the value of STR_LIT.
LLVM,NVPTX,2257,Result.clear();
LLVM,NVPTX,2258,"The next statement would be ""break;"" as there are no else statements, and it would end the loop and continue execution of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,2259,The next statement would likely be a call to a function or a conditional statement that uses the encoded array that was just created.
LLVM,NVPTX,2260,"</s>

The next statement would be ""return true;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2261,"There is no next statement as the code snippet contains a closing curly brace and an ""llvm_unreachable"" statement, indicating that the code has reached the end and will never reach the specified value."
LLVM,NVPTX,2262,Pass *RegisterNVVMIntrRangePass = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()->getPassInstance("nvvm-intr-range");
LLVM,NVPTX,2263,This snippet is not executable so it is not possible to predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2264,This code snippet initializes the NVVMIntrRangePass object with the specified NVVMIntrRangeSM parameter.
LLVM,NVPTX,2265,"Based on the pattern of the previous statements, the next statement will likely be another ternary conditional statement, where either ""PreservedAnalyses :: none()"" or ""PreservedAnalyses :: all()"" will be returned based on the result of ""runNVVMIntrRange(F, SmVersion)""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2266,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2267,"""return Changed;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2268,return false;
LLVM,NVPTX,2269,return true;
LLVM,NVPTX,2270,Return Type::getInt64Ty(Context)
LLVM,NVPTX,2271,"case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : Changed |= addRangeMetadata ( <NUM_LIT> , MaxGridSize . y , Call ) ; break ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2272,"case <STR_LIT> : Changed |= addRangeMetadata ( <NUM_LIT> , MaxGridSize . y + <NUM_LIT> , Call ) ; break ; case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : Changed |= addRangeMetadata ( <NUM_LIT> , MaxGridSize . z + <NUM_LIT> , Call ) ; break ;


The next statement is likely to be another ""case"" statement with a <STR_LIT> and a <STR_LIT> being checked against the value of Callee -> getIntrinsicID() before executing a function called addRangeMetadata"
LLVM,NVPTX,2273,"None, this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,2274,initializeLatencyReducerPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
LLVM,NVPTX,2275,">>


None. This is the end of the code snippet and there is no next statement to predict."
LLVM,NVPTX,2276,"None of the above cases match, so the default case will be executed, with no changes made to the Changed variable."
LLVM,NVPTX,2277,":: FunctionPass ( ->ID ) }

Declare that NVVMReflect is a FunctionPass"
LLVM,NVPTX,2278,"} //Next

The next statement is ""if (auto *Flag = mdconst::extract_or_null<ConstantInt>(F.getParent()->getModuleFlag(<STR_LIT>))) ReflectVal = Flag->getSExtValue();"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2279,The next statement of this code snippet will be an assert statement that checks if the value of the Str variable is an instance of a ConstantExpr and returns <STR_LIT> if true.
LLVM,NVPTX,2280,The next statement is most likely an opening curly brace indicating the beginning of a code block.
LLVM,NVPTX,2281,"DeleteInstruction ( U )
A constant is deleted from the instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,2282,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context about the code snippet and the values of the variables being used. The next statement could be a function call, a conditional statement, or an assignment statement, depending on the purpose and structure of the code."
LLVM,NVPTX,2283,"It is not possible to predict the exact next statement without knowing the contents of the NVVMReflect constructor and the value of SmVersion. However, it is likely that the next statement will involve creating and returning a new NVVMReflect object with the value of SmVersion passed as a parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,2284,The next statement is: initializeNVVMReflectPass(*PassRegistry::getAnalysisUsage());
LLVM,NVPTX,2285,This code snippet defines a class called "NVVMReflectPass" and creates a new instance of that class using a parameterless constructor. It then calls a method called "NVVMReflectPass" with a numerical parameter to configure the instance. The next statement is likely to be the actual implementation of the "NVVMReflectPass" method that performs some specific actions based on the provided parameter.
LLVM,NVPTX,2286,"This code snippet creates an instance of the NVVMReflectPass class, passing in a numerical value as a parameter."
LLVM,NVPTX,2287,"return true ; }

There is not enough information to predict the next statement."
LLVM,NVPTX,2288,VarMap[ReflectArg] = ReflectVal;
LLVM,NVPTX,2289,DEBUG(dbgs() << "Reflect value: " << ReflectArg << "\n");
LLVM,NVPTX,2290,"The next statement is: StringRef ReflectArg = ReflectArg . substr ( <NUM_LIT> , ReflectArg . size ( ) - <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2291,The next statement is "ToRemove.push_back(Call);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2292,"Call -> replaceAllUsesWith ( ConstantInt :: get ( Call -> getType ( ) , ReflectVal ) ) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2293,The code snippet is missing some context and it's not possible to accurately predict the next statement. Please provide more information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,NVPTX,2294,"""ToRemove.push_back(Reflect)"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2295,The next statement will be an assertion that confirms whether the value obtained from the call to the "getOperand" function is a constant expression and that it matches a specific string value.
LLVM,NVPTX,2296,":

 It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the contents of the ""Mapping"" variable or any other code that may be present after the snippet."
LLVM,NVPTX,2297,"""Complete the initialization process for NVVMReflectPass."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2298,assert (GV->hasName() && "Global variables must have names");
LLVM,NVPTX,2299,"""VarMap[NameValPair[<NUM_LIT>]] = Val;"""
LLVM,NVPTX,2300,This code snippet likely continues with some code that executes if the size of the vector "ToRemove" is equal to <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,NVPTX,2301,DEBUG("The updated variable is: ")
LLVM,NVPTX,2302,"The next statement will be: 
ToRemove.erase(Call) ;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2303,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without having access to the full code and understanding its logic. However, the next statement could potentially be an assignment or method call using the newly created NVVMReflect object."
LLVM,NVPTX,2304,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,NVPTX,2305,The next statement is "return true;"
LLVM,NVPTX,2306,"The code will check if the size of the ToRemove vector is equal to a certain number. If it is, the function will return false, otherwise it will proceed to erase all elements in ToRemove from their parents and return true."
LLVM,NVPTX,2307,"I != E ; ++ I )

""Check if the current entry in the Map is equal to the end, and if not, proceed to the next entry."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2308,The next statement would likely be a conditional statement that checks if the ReflectFunction is equal to a certain value (perhaps <NUM_LIT> again) and then performs an action based on that condition.
LLVM,NVPTX,2309,The next statement will be: "Res |= handleFunction(ReflectFunction);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2310,"The value of the integer variable, Val will be printed."
LLVM,NVPTX,2311,"The code will continue on to the next statement, which will be to check if there are any more virtual registers in the current instruction that need to be replaced. If there are, the program will add them to a vector of operands."
LLVM,NVPTX,2312,"else

allOperands.push_back(oper);"
LLVM,NVPTX,2313,"} else copy . addOperand ( oper ) ; return copy ; }

`MachineOperand oper = allOperands[j];
if (oper.isReg())`"
LLVM,NVPTX,2314,copy->setDesc(InstrInfo->get(getScalarVersion(copy))); MachineOperand src = copy->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>); unsigned regnum = src.getReg();
LLVM,NVPTX,2315,"otherOperands.push_back(MachineOperand(MF->getRegInfo(), dest));"
LLVM,NVPTX,2316,copy -> addReg(otherOperands[<NUM_LIT>])
LLVM,NVPTX,2317,"The for loop will execute and push copies of the instruction onto the vector ""copies"", with each copy having a different operand found at index <NUM_LIT> + i in the original instruction."
LLVM,NVPTX,2318,return copies[numcopies];
LLVM,NVPTX,2319,"Looking at the code, the next statement is likely to be a for loop or some other type of iteration over the elements in the ""scalarRegs"" vector. This is because we have just defined the vector and obtained the scalar registers from a specific register number. Therefore, the next logical step would be to perform some sort of operation on each element in the vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,2320,"It is likely that the next statement will involve using the `which` variable to access an integer value from the `src` vector, potentially using a method like `src.at(which)`."
LLVM,NVPTX,2321,"The next statement would most likely check if the immediate value retrieved from the MachineOperand is less than the number of copies and if so, add the corresponding register from src1, otherwise it would add the corresponding register from src2."
LLVM,NVPTX,2322,"In this snippet, the code is looping through a set of instructions and checking for virtual registers that need to be replaced. The next statement will likely involve replacing the operands with the corresponding registers in the ""operands"" vector."
LLVM,NVPTX,2323,The next statement would likely be to use the "allOperands" and "isDef" vectors to create the desired machine instruction.
LLVM,NVPTX,2324,dest.setIsDef();
LLVM,NVPTX,2325,The next statement is: copy->addOperand(otherOperands[i]);
LLVM,NVPTX,2326,copy -> RemoveOperand ( <NUM_LIT> )
LLVM,NVPTX,2327,copy.addOperand(src.getReg(regnum))
LLVM,NVPTX,2328,The code will loop through the number of copies needed and will build a MachineInstr using the scalar version of the original instruction for the next destination register.
LLVM,NVPTX,2329,The next statement would be: copies.push_back(copy).
LLVM,NVPTX,2330,"copy->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(scalarRegs[<NUM_LIT>], false));"
LLVM,NVPTX,2331,copy -> setIsKill ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2332,The code snippet is incomplete and the next statement cannot be determined without further context.
LLVM,NVPTX,2333,The next statement is "copies.push_back(copy);" which adds the newly created instruction to the vector "copies".
LLVM,NVPTX,2334,"The next statement will be conditional, checking if the index ""i"" is not equal to the value of ""elem""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2335,"if (which.getImm() < numcopies) {
    copy->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(src1[elem], false));
}"
LLVM,NVPTX,2336,"}

The next statement is an assert statement which checks that the specified operand is an Imm and <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,NVPTX,2337,"The next statement could be ""tm.initialize();"", where 'tm' is the argument passed into the constructor for the VectorElementize class. This would initialize the vector elementizer with the given data."
LLVM,NVPTX,2338,"""The new copies will be inserted into block BB at the current instruction pointer, and the instruction being iterated over will be added to the list of instructions to remove."""
LLVM,NVPTX,2339,The code will insert the copies of the instruction into the basic block at the current insert point.
LLVM,NVPTX,2340,"</s>

The code will return the value of the string literal."
LLVM,NVPTX,2341,if the assert statement is true and returns the element class for the vector register class.
LLVM,NVPTX,2342,The code snippet looks like it is trying to convert a vector register to a scalar register and update a mapping for an upcoming register number. The next statement will most likely involve using this mapping to access the converted scalar register.
LLVM,NVPTX,2343,return dest.isUndef() ;
LLVM,NVPTX,2344,"</s>

RC contains the register class of the register ""reg""."
LLVM,NVPTX,2345,return RC->isVector();
LLVM,NVPTX,2346,(coder uninterpretable</NUM_LIT>)
LLVM,NVPTX,2347,The next statement will be: assert (numDefs == <NUM_LIT> );
LLVM,NVPTX,2348,"The code will check if the destination register is a virtual register and has a string literal value. If the destination register is not being used in any other instructions, it will add the current instruction to the list of dead moves. Next, the code will loop through the dead moves list and delete each instruction from the parent instruction and return the size of the list."
LLVM,NVPTX,2349,The code will continue to execute and eventually return the boolean value "true".
LLVM,NVPTX,2350,"The next statement will likely be a conditional statement, such as an if statement, to check if the global variable RemoveRedundantMoves is true."
LLVM,NVPTX,2351,ss> TM.addPass(*
LLVM,NVPTX,2352,Set default register values for the target machine's vector elements.
LLVM,RISCV,0,"}

true"
LLVM,RISCV,1,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,2,The next statement will be a comparison of two values using the bitwise AND operator and a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3,"The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace, ending the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,4,"}</s>

""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,5,"}

false"
LLVM,RISCV,6,"</s>

This code snippet is likely part of a function or conditional statement that returns a boolean value. The next statement could involve taking action based on the result of the comparison between ""Val"" and a numerical value, potentially using an if-else statement or assigning the result to a variable."
LLVM,RISCV,7,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,8,"}</s>

true"
LLVM,RISCV,9,"</s>

A closing curly brace symbol."
LLVM,RISCV,10,"}

The next statement would likely contain a closing bracket to end the list or a new item within the list."
LLVM,RISCV,11,"The next statement will likely be the end of the code snippet or the closing of a function, such as ""}"" or ""end""."
LLVM,RISCV,12,The next statement will return a constant of type unsigned.
LLVM,RISCV,13,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,14,this->STI = STI;
LLVM,RISCV,15,"<STR_LIT>


, CommData() {
  return Is64Bit;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,16,"I cannot predict the next statement without more context. It could be something related to the ""ForceRelocs"" variable, or it could be a completely different statement unrelated to the current one."
LLVM,RISCV,17,The next statement is most likely to be a curly bracket closing the function or another statement inside the function.
LLVM,RISCV,18,"""_mulh_u8""

The next statement is likely to be:
        return ""_mulh_u8"";"
LLVM,RISCV,19,"unsigned Hi16 = ( ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ) << <NUM_LIT> ; unsigned Lo16 = ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ;

There is a syntax error in this code."
LLVM,RISCV,20,This portion of the code is handling different cases and returning values based on certain conditions. The next statement could be another case or a closing bracket to complete the current case.
LLVM,RISCV,21,"return (MCFixup::createOffset(Kind, Value, NumBytes);"
LLVM,RISCV,22,"</s>

`return create<ISA_LIT>ELFObjectWriter(OS, OSABI, Is64Bit);`"
LLVM,RISCV,23,"This code snippet returns a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>AsmBackend class, passing in the value of OSABI and whether the target is 64-bit architecture as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,24,">

This code snippet most likely comes from a class or struct definition and the next statement could be another virtual function that overrides a method from a base class or an attribute declaration."
LLVM,RISCV,25,"} , { <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> } , { <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> } }</s>

The next statement would be: return Infos[Kind]; - this returns the MCFixupKindInfo object at the index specified by the Kind passed into the function."
LLVM,RISCV,26,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,27,"// Relaxes the given instruction based on the given subtarget information and returns the result as a modified MCInst object.
  return Res;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,28,"</s>

```uint8_t OSABI , bool Is64Bit</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,29,"This code snippet defines a new class called ""AsmBackend"" that inherits from the ""MCAsmBackend"" class and has two member variables: OSABI and Is64Bit. The constructor of the class takes two parameters: OSABI (which is a uint8_t type) and Is64Bit (which is a boolean). The next statement could potentially be a function or variable declaration within the class, or a call to the constructor using specific values for the parameters. It is not possible to predict the exact statement without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,30,The next statement will be to return true.
LLVM,RISCV,31,It is not possible to predict without additional context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,32,"return Value ; }

The next statement is an if statement that checks if the value is an integer and if it is, reports an error. This is followed by another if statement that checks if the value has a certain bit set and if it does, reports an error. Finally, the code returns the value."
LLVM,RISCV,33,"Data [ Offset ] |= Value ;
Data[Offset + 1] |= Value >> 8 ;"
LLVM,RISCV,34,">

{ <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> }"
LLVM,RISCV,35,"}</s>

This code snippet appears to be defining a function called ""getTargetABI"" that will return the value of a variable called ""TargetABI"". The ""const"" keyword suggests that this function will not modify any data."
LLVM,RISCV,36,The next statement would likely be closing bracket or curly brace.
LLVM,RISCV,37,"</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without further context or knowledge about the code snippet. It could depend on the programming language, the purpose of the code, and other factors."
LLVM,RISCV,38,return STI .getFeatureBits()[<STR_LIT>] ;
LLVM,RISCV,39,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet without further context, as the code could continue in multiple different ways."
LLVM,RISCV,40,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,41,"</s>


The next statement is likely to be a return statement that indicates whether or not there will be any forced relocations in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,42,"return Infos [ Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind ] ;

The MCAsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo function will be called if the Kind variable is less than the value of the FirstTargetFixupKind variable. Otherwise, the function will return the information from the Infos array based on the Kind variable subtracted by the value of the FirstTargetFixupKind variable."
LLVM,RISCV,43,The next statement of this code snippet could be a return statement that calls the function MCAsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo() with the variable "Kind" as the argument. This would likely be followed by more code that utilizes the returned information about a specific fixup kind.
LLVM,RISCV,44,"return Bit11 | ( Bit9_8 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit6 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit7 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit5 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit4 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit3_1 << <NUM_LIT> ) ;

The next statement is: 
Value = Bit11 | ( Bit9_8 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit6 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit7 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit5 << <NUM_LIT"
LLVM,RISCV,45,Data[Offset + NumBytes + <NUM_LIT>] = uint8_t((Value >> (<NUM_LIT> * <NUM_LIT>)) & <NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,46,The next statement will likely involve using the OSABI variable in some way to continue manipulating or accessing target information.
LLVM,RISCV,47,"return make_unique<ISA>MCAsmBackend(T, STI, MRI, Options);"
LLVM,RISCV,48,Value = -2600
LLVM,RISCV,49,"return Offset == <NUM_LIT> ;

case <STR_LIT> : return Offset >= 0 ;"
LLVM,RISCV,50,"}

The statement after the closing curly brace will execute."
LLVM,RISCV,51,", { <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> }

{ <STR_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> }"
LLVM,RISCV,52,"}

There will be a check to make sure the assembler's context is valid, and then the code will check if the value is equal to a specific number and return true if it is."
LLVM,RISCV,53,"AddFixups ( <NUM_LIT> , { <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> } ) ; }</s>

Call the function isUIntN() with the arguments <NUM_LIT> and Value."
LLVM,RISCV,54,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the code and understanding the specific context. Some possible statements that could follow this code snippet could include ""printf(""Error: Unknown opcode"");"", ""Res.execute();"", or ""return Res;""."
LLVM,RISCV,55,"Res.addOperand(Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));
break;"
LLVM,RISCV,56,"The next statement would most likely be another case statement, as indicated by the ""break"" in the default case."
LLVM,RISCV,57,"</s>

""If HasStdExtC is true, then return false."""
LLVM,RISCV,58,"Ctx . <STATUS_LIT> [[ true]]

Should return false."
LLVM,RISCV,59,"The next statement will likely involve using the MCFixup object created in the previous line, either by passing it as a parameter to another function or calling a method on it."
LLVM,RISCV,60,The statement checks the final condition of the for loop and either executes a write function or returns true.
LLVM,RISCV,61,"</s>

OS << ""\taddi x0, x0, 0"""
LLVM,RISCV,62,"if ( ! HasStdExtC ) { bool HasExtC = STI . getFeatureBits <BLN_LIT> ;

return HasExtC;}"
LLVM,RISCV,63,"unsigned Bit7 = ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ; Value = ( Bit8 << <NUM_LIT> ) | Bit7 ; return Value ; }

The next statement could be another ""case"" statement, or a default case statement."
LLVM,RISCV,64,"}

The next statement would likely be ""case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : case <STR_LIT> : return Value ;"" This statement is the default case and will execute if none of the previous cases are met."
LLVM,RISCV,65,SWITCH_DEFAULT
LLVM,RISCV,66,"""The function shouldInsertExtraNopBytesForCodeAlign returns true."""
LLVM,RISCV,67,"It is likely that the next statement will be to set the size variable to the result of the getAlignment method on the AF object, subtracting the value of MinNopLen from it."
LLVM,RISCV,68,"Fixup.applyFixup(FixedValue, NopBytes, STI);"
LLVM,RISCV,69,"</s>

```
If this function fails, a relevant error code will be returned.
</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,70,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,71,"unsigned Bit1_0 = ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ; return ( Bit1_0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit10 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit9_8 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit6 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit4 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit11 << <NUM_LIT> ) ;

The next statement would likely be another case statement with some additional code to handle a specific type of input data. This could potentially involve more bitwise operations and reporting errors."
LLVM,RISCV,72,case <STR_LIT> : break;
LLVM,RISCV,73,"The next statement would be the end of the code snippet, ending the array declaration with a closing curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,74,"return <s>

Missing: End of switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,75,The next statement would be Res.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(IsCapMode ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>)); Res.addOperand(Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)); break;
LLVM,RISCV,76,"The next statement could potentially be a break statement, as it is the default case in the switch statement. However, it could also be a return statement if none of the cases are met and the default case is not executed."
LLVM,RISCV,77,"Value = ( Bit8 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit7_6 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Bit5 << <NUM_LIT> 

Value = (Value >> JUMP) & MASK; return Value; }"
LLVM,RISCV,78,"}
The next statement is a ""break"" statement, as it appears that the code snippet is part of a switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,79,The next statement is a "case <STR_LIT>:" with a condition to set the boolean "ShouldForce" to true.
LLVM,RISCV,80,"return <NUM_LIT>

This code snippet contains multiple switch cases. It is likely that the next statement will be another <STR_LIT> case, since the majority of the cases in this snippet are for <STR_LIT> statements."
LLVM,RISCV,81,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the value of the <STR_LIT> placeholder. The code could potentially continue with a similar structure, with more string literals being checked and a potential return statement at the end. Alternatively, the code could continue with a default case or another conditional statement."
LLVM,RISCV,82,Data[Offset + i] = (Value >> (i * 8)) & 0xFF
LLVM,RISCV,83,"if (IsResolved) {
    // Do something
} else {
    // Do something else
}"
LLVM,RISCV,84,"return create<ISA_LIT>MachOObjectWriter(OS, OSABI, Is64Bit);"
LLVM,RISCV,85,The next statement could be a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,86,"The next statement would likely be a command to execute the code and return the updated value. This could be something like ""printf(""The next value is: %d\n"", Value);"" or ""return Value;"" depending on the context of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,87,Data[Offset + FullSize] |= uint8_t((Value >> (FullSize * <NUM_LIT>)) & <NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,88,"if (i != FullSize) {
    continue;
} else {
    break;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,89,MCTargetOptions Options = T. Options;
LLVM,RISCV,90,"The next statement will likely check if the variable ""Kind"" is less than the variable ""FirstTargetFixupKind"", and if so, it will return the result of the function ""MCAsmBackend :: getFixupKindInfo(Kind)""."
LLVM,RISCV,91,"The next statement will likely involve calling a function or accessing a variable to retrieve information about a specific fixup kind, using the ""Kind"" variable as an input parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,92,"}</s>

The next statement will be the default case, which returns a <NUM_LIT> value."
LLVM,RISCV,93,"uint64_t Bitfield = ( ( UpperImm & <NUM_LIT> ) << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( LowerImm & <NUM_LIT> ) ; return Bitfield ; }

(uint64_t) Bitfield = ((UpperImm & <NUM_LIT>) << <NUM_LIT>) | (LowerImm & <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,94,"The next statement is likely a break statement, as it signifies the end of one case and the start of another."
LLVM,RISCV,95,"if (Type == <STR_LIT>) {
    return static_cast<MCFixupKind>(FirstLiteralRelocationKind + Type);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,96,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It depends on the specific implementation of the getFixupKind function in the AsmBackend class.
LLVM,RISCV,97,"</s>

Assign the value of STI to TargetTriple and the value of STI's feature bits to FeatureBits."
LLVM,RISCV,98,"This code snippet is defining the constructor for a class called AsmBackend. It takes in four parameters - STI, OSABI, Is64Bit, and Options - and initializes the class's member variables with these values. The next likely statement would be the initialization of another member variable, possibly using the STI parameter, followed by the opening of a set of curly braces for the constructor's body."
LLVM,RISCV,99,"The next statement could either be a closing bracket, a declaration of a variable or function, or another condition/return statement. It is impossible to determine the exact next statement without knowing the context of the code snippet, specifically the values of the variables and the functions being used."
LLVM,RISCV,100,"return Offset > <NUM_LIT> || Offset < - <NUM_LIT> ;

It is difficult to predict the exact next statement without knowing the values of the variables <STR_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>, and Fixup. However, based on the current pattern, the next statement could potentially be another case statement comparing Offset to a literal number or it could be the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,101,This snippet does not contain any more code.
LLVM,RISCV,102,"This constructor function initializes the MCAsmBackend object and assigns the values of the STI, OSABI, and Is64Bit parameters to their corresponding member variables."
LLVM,RISCV,103,"if ( Nop16Count != <NUM_LIT> ) {

uint64_t Nop8Count = (Count - Nop32Count * <NUM_LIT> - Nop16Count * <NUM_LIT>) / <NUM_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,104,"}</s>

The code snippet will return and end without performing any further actions."
LLVM,RISCV,105,"}

The next statement would be: 
if (AF.getAlignment() % MinNopLen == 0) { 
    return true; 
}"
LLVM,RISCV,106,"NopBytes.resolve(MCSymbolRefExpr :: create ( <STR_LIT> , Ctx ) , Fixup , FixedValue , AAF , AF )"
LLVM,RISCV,107,Asm.getWriter().emitInstruction(Ret);
LLVM,RISCV,108,The next statement is an if statement comparing the Kind variable to the FirstLiteralRelocationKind variable.
LLVM,RISCV,109,ShouldForce = false ;
LLVM,RISCV,110,unsigned DBit = ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ; Value = ( DBit << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( 0 << <NUM_LIT> ) ; return Value ; }
LLVM,RISCV,111,"next Stmt= <s>
<s> AsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo(Fixup.getKind()) </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,112,"}

The next statement will be a return statement, where the value of ""Value"" is updated based on the bit operations performed in the previous code."
LLVM,RISCV,113,"unsigned Hi9 = ( Value >> <NUM_LIT> ) & <NUM_LIT> ; Value = ( Sbit << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Hi9 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( Mid6 << <NUM_LIT> ) | Hi1 ; return Value ; }

This snippet likely belongs in a switch statement and will return a value based on the value of the case statement."
LLVM,RISCV,114,"}

The next statement will likely be:

Data[Offset + i] |= uint8_t((Value >> (i * (NumBytes / <NUM_LIT>))) & <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,115,The code will return an object of type "ELFObjectWriter" with the specified operating system ABI and bit size as parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,116,The next statement would likely be to assign a value to the variable 'OSABI' using the function 'getOSABI'.
LLVM,RISCV,117,The value of TT is equal to the target triple obtained from the STI object.
LLVM,RISCV,118,"return Offset > <NUM_LIT> || Offset < - <NUM_LIT> ;<STR_LIT>

The next statement is ""case <STR_LIT> : return Offset > <NUM_LIT> || Offset < - <NUM_LIT> ;<STR_LIT>""."
LLVM,RISCV,119,"}


The next statement will be a closing curly brace to end the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,120,"} </s>
The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function block."
LLVM,RISCV,121,"The next statement will check if the relaxed opcode of the given instruction is equal to the original opcode, using the getRelaxedOpcode() function."
LLVM,RISCV,122,The next statement is likely to be a break statement to conclude the switch case.
LLVM,RISCV,123,"} }

ShouldForce = T -> getValue( ) -> findAssociatedFragment( ) != Fixup . getValue( ) -> findAssociatedFragment( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,124,"case <STR_LIT> : return adjust
Next, we enter the default switch case and move on to the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,125,if (Count % (MinNopLen + 1) == 0) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,126,else if ( const MCSymbolRefExpr * SymRef = dyn_cast < MCSymbolRefExpr > ( Expr ) ) Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createExpr ( SymRef ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,127,Inst . execute();
LLVM,RISCV,128,"Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand ::createImm(0)) }

This code snippet adds an immediate operand with a value of 0 to the given MCInst."
LLVM,RISCV,129,"addExpr (Inst, getImm());"
LLVM,RISCV,130,"It is likely that the next statement will revolve around the assertion being either true or false. For example, the next statement could be ""If assertion is true, continue with execution. If false, display error message."""
LLVM,RISCV,131,The next statement would likely involve using the unique pointer named "Op" to create a new "Operand" object with the given parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,132,"return std :: move ( std :: move ( Op ) ) }

std :: unique_ptr < <ISA_LIT>Operand > createImm ( const MCExpr * Expr , SMLoc StartLoc , SMLoc EndLoc ) { auto Op = make_unique < <ISA_LIT>Operand > ( KindImm , StartLoc , EndLoc ) ; Op -> Imm = Expr ; 
  return std :: move ( std :: move ( Op ) ) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,133,Op->Mem.Disp = Disp;
LLVM,RISCV,134,Op -> Mem . Scale = Scale
LLVM,RISCV,135,"return Op ; 

This code creates a static function called ""createReg"", which takes in parameters for register kind, number, start location, and end location, and returns a unique pointer to an Operand object. The function creates an Operand object with the specified parameters, assigns the register kind and number, and then returns the object."
LLVM,RISCV,136,Op->Token.Data will assign Str.data() to the Data member of the Op->Token object.
LLVM,RISCV,137,"} 

return Imm ;"
LLVM,RISCV,138,return Reg;
LLVM,RISCV,139,"</s>

This code snippet returns a reference to a string that contains the data and length of the token."
LLVM,RISCV,140,"None, the code snippet ends."
LLVM,RISCV,141,"It appears that the next statement will be a boolean expression, comparing the value of ""Value"" to a minimum and maximum value, and returning whether it falls within that range."
LLVM,RISCV,142,"</s>

</s> return isReg (ECUB34Reg) ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,143,"}

The next statement would be the closing curly brace of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,144,"}</s>

This code snippet does not have enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It appears to be a function that checks whether a certain type of register (possibly a floating point 32-bit register) is present, but it could be followed by various other statements depending on the purpose of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,145,"""This code snippet returns whether the FP32Reg is a registered value."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,146,"</s>

false"
LLVM,RISCV,147,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function or code block."
LLVM,RISCV,148,The return value will be true.
LLVM,RISCV,149,That the function is checking if a given memory register has a displacement value in the range of -<NUM_LIT> to <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,150,"</s>

This code will return a boolean value for whether the PairFP128Reg is registered or not."
LLVM,RISCV,151,"</s><s>

return false; }"
LLVM,RISCV,152,"</s>

The code snippet is declaring a function called ""isPairFP64"" that takes no arguments and returns a boolean value. The function is also marked as constant."
LLVM,RISCV,153,"}

The next statement could be a closing curly brace ( } ) to end the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,154,</s> The "isPCR64Reg" function will return the result of calling "isReg" with the argument "PCR64Reg."
LLVM,RISCV,155,"return false </s>

false"
LLVM,RISCV,156,"</s>

The function will return a boolean value, indicating whether or not the PCRReg is a registered user."
LLVM,RISCV,157,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without knowing what the variables Kind, KindReg, Reg, and RegKind represent. However, based on the existing code, the next statement could be a conditional statement or a return statement, as it is checking if the value of the variable Kind is equal to the value of the variable KindReg and if the value of the variable Reg.Kind is equal to the value of the variable RegKind."
LLVM,RISCV,158,"The next statement will likely be:

 ""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,159,"This code snippet is not complete and therefore it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement. The snippet may be waiting for user input or may have errors that prevent it from running. Without more information, it is not possible to know what the next statement will be."
LLVM,RISCV,160,ret
LLVM,RISCV,161,"I apologize, I cannot complete this task as the code snippet is not complete. It is missing necessary information for me to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,162,"</s>

<s> return isArray ( <IDENT> ) ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,163,"</s>

if the <NUM_LIT> are both equal, the function will return True. If they are not equal, it will return False."
LLVM,RISCV,164,"</s>

return opCode == <S>OpCode</S>.U32Imm;"
LLVM,RISCV,165,It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context.
LLVM,RISCV,166,"return _parType == U4_IMM ;

return _parSize == 4;"
LLVM,RISCV,167,"</s>



}"
LLVM,RISCV,168,The next statement will call the function isImm and pass in two numerical literals as arguments.
LLVM,RISCV,169,<s> RegisterMCAsmParser < <ISA_LIT>AsmParser > Y ( TheRISCV64Target ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,170,"return Error(ErrorLoc, ""Invalid operand."");"
LLVM,RISCV,171,} else if ( IDLoc >= Operands . size ( ErrorInfo
LLVM,RISCV,172,"}

Check if getParser().parseExpression() is successful. If it is, set the value of unsigned Index to the value of <NUM_LIT> and set the value of unsigned Base to the value of <NUM_LIT>. If the lexer's current token is a left parenthesis, parse a register using the parseRegister() function, passing it parameters 'x' and GR32Regs, and set the OperandMatchResultTy Result variable to the return value. If the Result is not MatchOperand_Success, return the Result value. If the lexer's current token is a comma, parse another register using the parseRegister() function,"
LLVM,RISCV,173,"</s>

<s> } </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,174,"Possible next statement:

This function parses the specified register for 32-bit floating-point operands."
LLVM,RISCV,175,"This code snippet likely returns the parsing of a register (specifically, a floating point 64-bit register) from a set of operands using a specific parser function."
LLVM,RISCV,176,"The next statement will be to call the function parseRegister with the parameters Operands, 'f', FP64Regs, and <ISA_LIT>Operand::FP64Reg, and return the result as the OperandMatchResultTy data type."
LLVM,RISCV,177,"</s>

This code snippet returns the result of parsing a register that is specified as a 32-bit general-purpose register, and the next statement may involve using this register in a larger function or operation."
LLVM,RISCV,178,"}</s>

The next statement will likely be a closing curly bracket, indicating the end of the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,179,"+ } }



The prediction cannot be made as the code snippet is incomplete and does not follow a logical sequence. It is missing necessary information to accurately predict the next statement, such as the variables and their values, function definitions, and control flow."
LLVM,RISCV,180,"If (ResTy == MatchOperand_ParseFail), then set Expr equal to the next Operand in Operands."
LLVM,RISCV,181,"</s>

The next statement would likely involve some form of error handling or reporting, such as checking if the parsed result is valid or setting a flag indicating if the parsing was successful."
LLVM,RISCV,182,"The next statement is an error handling statement, returning an error at the current location if the token is not a right parenthesis."
LLVM,RISCV,183,"The code snippet appears to be conditional statements that check if a certain identifier is equal to a string literal. Based on the pattern of the code, the next statement is likely another ""else if"" statement checking for a different identifier."
LLVM,RISCV,184,"The next statement could be implementing another else-if statement that checks the identifier against another string literal, followed by more code to handle the result of the check."
LLVM,RISCV,185,return StartLoc;
LLVM,RISCV,186,"}</s>
 It is not possible to reach the specified statement."
LLVM,RISCV,187,return Parser.parseNextInstruction();
LLVM,RISCV,188,MCAsmLexerExtension::Initialize(Parser);
LLVM,RISCV,189,return this.Operand;
LLVM,RISCV,190,"}
// Definition of a class called Operand, which takes in three parameters: kind, startLoc, and endLoc. The class has three variables of the same names initialized to the passed in values."
LLVM,RISCV,191,"}

""Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SysReg.Type)) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,192,<ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None ;
LLVM,RISCV,193,"else if (VK == 0)
{ 
  cout << ""This expression cannot be evaluated as a constant or an instruction."" << endl; 
}"
LLVM,RISCV,194,"case 'n' : Imm |= <STR_LIT> ; break ; } }

Predicted next statement:
return Instruction;"
LLVM,RISCV,195,The next statement will likely involve adding another operand to the instruction and creating an immediate value using the getRoundingMode() function.
LLVM,RISCV,196,"</s>

Inst.addOperand(ImmOperand(N));"
LLVM,RISCV,197,"<s> assert ( N == <NUM_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ; subExpr ( Inst , getImm ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,198,"""An error message will be returned since the assert statement returns false."""
LLVM,RISCV,199,"</s>

False

False"
LLVM,RISCV,200,"If the Kind is not KindTy::Immediate, the code will not execute the evaluateConstantImm function."
LLVM,RISCV,201,It is likely that the next statement will involve using the ErrorLoc variable as an argument in a function or method call.
LLVM,RISCV,202,"This code snippet checks if the result of evaluating the expression is a relocatable address and returns the reference kind of that result, or false if there is no reference kind."
LLVM,RISCV,203,"<e>

It is likely that the next statement will define a switch or if statement, checking for different types of expressions to determine the appropriate variant kind for the symbol reference."
LLVM,RISCV,204,Do something with the feature result.
LLVM,RISCV,205,The code will return the value of the variable 'Reg' minus a certain number plus a certain number.
LLVM,RISCV,206,<STR_LIT> + <STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,207,It will return a matching super register for the given arguments.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,208,Op -> length = L ; return Op ;
LLVM,RISCV,209,return Op;
LLVM,RISCV,210,"""End of code snippet reached."""
LLVM,RISCV,211,No prediction can be made without knowing the value of "Str".
LLVM,RISCV,212,"</s>

None"
LLVM,RISCV,213,"return Op;}

The next statement will be to return the variable ""Op""."
LLVM,RISCV,214,"The code returns an Operand object created using the specified register and source locations, and specifying if it is a 64-bit register."
LLVM,RISCV,215,The next statement will emit the instruction represented by <STR_LIT> with the TmpReg and SymbolHi operands to the Out streamer.
LLVM,RISCV,216,"This code snippet will create a temporary label using the MCSymbol class and the createNamedTempSymbol function from the Ctx variable. It will then emit this label to the Out streamer. The next statement will create a new constant expression using the ISA_LIT class and the create function from the MCExpr variable, passing in the Symbol and VKHi variables and the Ctx variable as parameters. This expression will be added to the MCInstBuilder variable using the addOperand and addExpr functions, along with a TmpReg variable. Finally, the emitToStreamer function will be used to emit this instruction to the Out streamer."
LLVM,RISCV,217,"}

if (ParserOptions.IsPicEnabled) {
SecondOpcode = isRV64() ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,218,The next statement would be another "case" statement followed by a similar format for emitting to the streamer.
LLVM,RISCV,219,It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed.
LLVM,RISCV,220,"The next statement could be an instruction to perform a calculation or operation using the variables and operands from the previous line of code. Or, it could be a line of code to store or output the result of the calculation. Without more context, it is difficult to accurately predict the exact statement."
LLVM,RISCV,221,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted.
LLVM,RISCV,222,"<s> emitJalrInst ( DestReg , DestReg , Symbol , <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_TLS_LDM , <STR_LIT> , IDLoc , Out ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,223,"SecondOpcode will be equal to <STR_LIT> if the function isRV64() returns true, otherwise it will be equal to <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,224,"}

The next statement is:
 
Out.emitInstruction(SecondOpcode, DestReg, SourceReg, ShAmt, IDLoc, MCStreamer);"
LLVM,RISCV,225,"Inst
."
LLVM,RISCV,226,"""CInst"" is compressed using the ""Inst"" instruction and the ""getSTI"" function, and the result is stored in ""Res"" variable."
LLVM,RISCV,227,"emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(<STR_LIT>).addOperand(Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)).addOperand(Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)))"
LLVM,RISCV,228,"</s>


if (auto CE = dyn_cast <MCConstantExpr>(Expr)) {
     return CE -> evaluateAsConstant(Imm);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,229,"The code will return an Error with the specified location and a message that includes a string literal and two values for Lower and Upper, respectively."
LLVM,RISCV,230,"}


""The function getEndLoc returns the EndLoc value."""
LLVM,RISCV,231,"<s> If EndLoc is not None, the next statement will be ""return EndLoc ;"". If EndLoc is None, the program will terminate without executing a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,232,I cannot predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information.
LLVM,RISCV,233,The next statement would be to access a specific feature using the feature index.
LLVM,RISCV,234,return Imm.Val;
LLVM,RISCV,235,return loc + offset;
LLVM,RISCV,236,"</s>

""Returns the location of the current statement."""
LLVM,RISCV,237,An error will be thrown as the Kind variable is not equal to the Register type.
LLVM,RISCV,238,"</s>

The code will assign the value of a string literal to the variable ""FRM"" and retrieve the name of the symbol returned by the ""getSymbol"" method of the object ""SE""."
LLVM,RISCV,239,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be creating a variable called ""FRM"" and setting it equal to an object or function that takes a string parameter and uses a method called ""getSymbol"" to access the name of a symbol from the ""SE"" object."
LLVM,RISCV,240,return startLoc;
LLVM,RISCV,241,"}</s>

The next statement is likely to be a return statement that returns the value of the ""StartLoc"" variable. This will mark the end of the ""getStartLoc"" function and inform the compiler that the function should return a value of type ""SMLoc""."
LLVM,RISCV,242,throw std::runtime_error("Invalid system register");
LLVM,RISCV,243,"}

The code will return a StringRef object containing the value of the SystemRegister data."
LLVM,RISCV,244,";

This code snippet does not provide enough information to predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,245,The next statement could be a return statement that returns an unsigned value of the vType.
LLVM,RISCV,246,"return Val . Type < / s>

""assert ( ! Val.Type {! /s"""
LLVM,RISCV,247,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  // Do something with the constant immediate value
} else {
  // Handle error or unknown immediate value type
}"
LLVM,RISCV,248,"</s>

<ISA_LIT>

IsValid = <ISA_LIT>AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK)"
LLVM,RISCV,249,return true
LLVM,RISCV,250,return Imm && VK;
LLVM,RISCV,251,VK = VK_None
LLVM,RISCV,252,<ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_<ISA_LIT>_Error;
LLVM,RISCV,253,"MCOperand CreateMCOperand ( 

IsConstantImm && ( Imm != <NUM_LIT>) && ( isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= <NUM_LIT> && Imm <= <NUM_LIT> ) ) && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None;"
LLVM,RISCV,254,The next statement could be creating a new object of type MCExpr and setting its VariantKind to VK_<ISA_LIT>_None.
LLVM,RISCV,255,"</s

bool isCSRSystemRegister ( ) const { </s> return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,256,"The statement after the second ""return false;"" would be ""Prev = c;"", which is the next iteration of the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,257,"}

This code snippet is checking if the string contained in the variable Str only contains the letters ""i"", ""o"", ""r"" and ""w"". If any other character is found, the code will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,258,return Str.size();
LLVM,RISCV,259,"if (SVal) { 
 Instruction.setMetadata(""RISCV"", SVal->getSymbol().getName());
}"
LLVM,RISCV,260,"</s>
False"
LLVM,RISCV,261,"</s>


It is uncertain as the code snippet is incomplete and does not have a complete and syntactically correct structure."
LLVM,RISCV,262,It is likely that the next statement will involve using the GPR (General Purpose Register) and/or FPR (Floating Point Register) for further operations.
LLVM,RISCV,263,"}

This function returns a boolean value indicating whether the given input is a GPRF64 converted to an FPR."
LLVM,RISCV,264,"</s>

</s> Return true if this function is called for checking the compatibility of a General-Purpose Register and a Floating-Point Register. </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,265,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement, checking if the first three conditions are true and the last condition is false."
LLVM,RISCV,266,"Imm = <ISA_LIT> getImm ( ) ;

if (Imm >= 0) {
    // do something
} else {
    // do something else
}"
LLVM,RISCV,267,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,268,return false;
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,269,"}

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The override keyword suggests that there may be a parent class or interface being implemented, but without the context of the rest of the code, it is impossible to know what the next statement will be."
LLVM,RISCV,270,There is not enough context provided to accurately predict the next statement. The next statement could be anything depending on what else is included in the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,271,"return true ;
if (VK == MCExpr::VK_PseudoJumpSymbol) {
  return true;
} else {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,272,"return isImm ( Imm ) && isX86ModRMFilter ( Imm ) ;

False"
LLVM,RISCV,273,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,274,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. The next line of code could vary depending on what the function getSTI() and the variable <STR_LIT> are meant to do. In general, the next statement could be a comparison or conditional statement, an assignment or modification of a variable, or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,275,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,276,"This code snippet will return a boolean value of true if the evaluated constant immediate is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, and if it is a shifted integer with a value less than <NUM_LIT> shifted by <NUM_LIT>. It will also return true if VK is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None."
LLVM,RISCV,277,if (!IsConstantImm) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,278,"if (IsValid && IsConstantImm) {
  // do something
} else {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,279,The next statement will be "}" indicating the end of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,280,"</s>

I am unable to predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and lacks context."
LLVM,RISCV,281,"</s>

The next statement will likely involve using the boolean variable ""IsConstantImm"" to determine a conditional statement or perform some other operation."
LLVM,RISCV,282,return (0 <= getImm() && getImm() <= 31);
LLVM,RISCV,283,"if(IsConstantImm) {
 std::cout << ""Immediate value is constant."" ;
}

The code will check if the value stored in IsConstantImm is true or false, and if it is true, it will print the message ""Immediate value is constant."""
LLVM,RISCV,284,"else return getImm ( ) + 1 ;
The next statement will return the value of getImm() plus 1."
LLVM,RISCV,285,<ISA_LIT>MCExpr *New = new <ISA_LIT>MCExpr ( VK ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,286,The next statement could be an if statement checking the value of IsConstantImm.
LLVM,RISCV,287,"</s>

This code snippet is invalid syntax and cannot be accurately predicted. It is likely missing necessary information or contains a typo."
LLVM,RISCV,288,"}

The next statement is a closing curly bracket, marking the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,289,"return (RPARENS (isSR ); }

The next statement is likely to be a curly bracket closing the function block."
LLVM,RISCV,290,The next statement will likely be a closing bracket or a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,291,"</s>

I cannot predict the next statement without understanding the context and purpose of this code snippet. Please provide more information."
LLVM,RISCV,292,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,293,"""IsConstantImm is set to the value of evaluating the constant immediate with the given VariantKind."""
LLVM,RISCV,294,"The next statement will be a conditional statement, using the variable IsConstantImm to determine the flow of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,295,"</s>

return IsConstantImm;"
LLVM,RISCV,296,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,297,"""return isInt<32>(Imm) && (VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_TLS_GD_GPREL || VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_TLS_LDM || VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_TLS_GOT_OFF_64 || VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_GOTTPREL || VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_TLS_DTPREL_HI || VK == MCExpr::VK_Mips_TLS_LO));"""
LLVM,RISCV,298,"}


The IsValid variable will be set to the result of calling the classifySymbolRef function with the parameters getImm() and VK."
LLVM,RISCV,299,"if ( IsConstantImm ) return true ; </s>

if (VK == MCExpr::VK_Scalar) {

  return true;

}"
LLVM,RISCV,300,int64_t Size ;
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,301,The next statement would likely involve checking the validity of the expression or potentially modifying the value of VariantKind VK.
LLVM,RISCV,302,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  // Do something with the evaluated constant immediate value
} else {
  // Handle error
}"
LLVM,RISCV,303,"</s>

True"
LLVM,RISCV,304,if ( isUImm8Lsb00 ) {return Imm &amp;
LLVM,RISCV,305,MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None
LLVM,RISCV,306,<ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VariantKind VK = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_Hex;
LLVM,RISCV,307,"I'm sorry, I am an AI and I cannot predict the next statement without seeing the actual code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,308,"This code snippet is likely part of a function or method, and the next statement will likely return a boolean value based on the conditions set in the code. It could be something like ""return true;"" or ""return false;"" depending on the specific values of the variables and constants."
LLVM,RISCV,309,The next statement could be another line of code or a closing bracket to end the "if" statement block. It is not possible to accurately predict the exact statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,310,return ( isRV64 ( ) && isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ) || isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,311,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,312,"""return false"""
LLVM,RISCV,313,"This code snippet is checking for a constant immediate value and attempting to evaluate it. If the evaluation fails or the variant kind is not VK_<ISA_LIT>_None, the statement will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,314,The next statement could be a conditional statement evaluating whether or not Imm is equal to some value.
LLVM,RISCV,315,"The next statement would likely involve returning a boolean value. It would check if the Imm variable is an unsigned integer of a specific size, possibly related to the instruction set architecture being used (e.g. RV64 or 32)."
LLVM,RISCV,316,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement that checks if the Kind is a register and if the Register number matches the given string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,317,This code snippet does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,318,This code snippet does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,319,The next statement could be a closing curly brace "}" to end the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,320,"IsConstantImm will contain the boolean value returned by the evaluateConstantImm function, passing the values from the getImm() function, Imm, and VK as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,321,"<ISA_LIT>VariantKind VK = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_Read |

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,322,This code snippet registers an MC assembly parser for the <ISA_LIT>32 target.
LLVM,RISCV,323,"If the RegNo value is equal to <STR_LIT>, then the next statement would be RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName (Name)."
LLVM,RISCV,324,"This code snippet defines a new symbol and checks if it is a variable. If it is a variable, the symbol's value is retrieved."
LLVM,RISCV,325,"""

MatchOperand_ParseFail"
LLVM,RISCV,326,"return MatchOperand_ParseFail

MatchOperand_ParseFail"
LLVM,RISCV,327,"Error ( S , Msg + <STR_LIT> + Twine ( <NUM_LIT> ) + <STR_LIT> ) ; return </s>

MatchOperand_ParseFail;"
LLVM,RISCV,328,if (IDVal == <STR_LIT>) return parseDirectiveEnd();
LLVM,RISCV,329,"} ) ; return Error ( ValueExprLoc , Buffer ) ; }

Error (ValueExprLoc, Buffer)"
LLVM,RISCV,330,"The next statement will likely be a conditional statement, such as an ""if"" or ""else"" statement, that is dependent on the results of the previous ""MatchAndEmitInstruction"" function call."
LLVM,RISCV,331,"}


The code will check if the current token is an Identifier, and if not, it will return an error. Otherwise, it will check the value of the Identifier and execute a specific directive based on the option chosen. Then it will check if the token after the directive is an EndOfStatement, and if not, it will return an error. If the token is an EndOfStatement, it will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,332,The next statement is a return statement with the value of MatchOperand_NoMatch.
LLVM,RISCV,333,"</s>

The next statement is likely the end of a conditional statement, possibly followed by a return statement or another break statement."
LLVM,RISCV,334,return Operands;
LLVM,RISCV,335,It will return the result of the condition statement result of the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,336,getLexer().Lex();
LLVM,RISCV,337,getLexer ( ) . isNot(AsmToken::Identifier)
LLVM,RISCV,338,If (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfFile)
LLVM,RISCV,339,"}
if ( parseMemOpOffset ( Operands ) == MatchOperand_Success ) return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,340,The next statement would be to assign the result of the function getLexer().getKind() to a variable.
LLVM,RISCV,341,"Operands.push_back(<ISA_LIT>Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));
return MatchOperand_Success;"
LLVM,RISCV,342,"}

The next statement will be ""return MatchOperand_NoMatch""."
LLVM,RISCV,343,"}

The next statement would be ""if (getParser().getTok().is(AsmToken::Minus)) { //Skip negative sign getLex().Lex(); }"", which would skip over a negative sign if present in the input."
LLVM,RISCV,344,The next statement is an if statement checking if the current token in the lexer is not a left parenthesis.
LLVM,RISCV,345,"</s>

Create an object called ParserOptions and assign it the value popped from the end of the ParserOptionsStack."
LLVM,RISCV,346,The next statement will likely reset the parser options to the previous value stored in the stack using the pop_back_val method. This will ensure that the parser is using the correct options for future operations.
LLVM,RISCV,347,"break

Kind is classified as a vtype and the file will be printed as a specific operating system kernel type."
LLVM,RISCV,348,default: OS << <STR_LIT>Unknown kind<STR_LIT>;}
LLVM,RISCV,349,<s> FeatureBitStack . pop_back ( ) ; ParserOptionsStack . pop_back ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,350,"</s>

""This function ensures that the stacks for feature bits and parser options have the same size."""
LLVM,RISCV,351,"The next statement is ""TargetParser::setTargetTriple(STI.getTargetTriple(), STI.getFeatureBits(), ABIName);"" followed by ""const MCObjectFileInfo* MOFI = Parser.getContext().getObjectFileInfo();"" and ""ParserOptions.IsPicEnabled = MOFI->isPositionIndependent();""."
LLVM,RISCV,352,"</s>
The next statement will be an ""else"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,353,"-  inRegex ( StringRef Name )




The next statement will be a return statement that returns a boolean value."
LLVM,RISCV,354,"The code snippet most likely matches a register name, and if it successfully matches, it will return a ""MatchOperand_NoMatch"" value. Afterwards, the parser will move on to the next token and then return a ""MatchOperand_Success"" value."
LLVM,RISCV,355,"It looks like the next statement will check for constraints on the instruction by accessing the MCInstrDesc data and comparing it to a defined string. If the constraints match, it will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,356,"return Match_Success ; }


The next statement will check if the register is of type VR and the Kind is equal to either MCK_VRM2, MCK_VRM4, or MCK_VRM8. If so, it will convert the VR register to VRMx and return Match_Success."
LLVM,RISCV,357,"}


The code snippet predicts the next statement will be ""}"" indicating the end of the ""for"" loop."
LLVM,RISCV,358,throw new Error("Invalid operation");
LLVM,RISCV,359,<NUM_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,360,"The code will emit an MCInstBuilder with the given Opcode and add the operands from Inst using the getOperand method. It will then emit another MCInstBuilder with the given string literal and add the operands from Inst using the getOperand method, along with a register specified by another string literal. If the number of operands in Inst is equal to the given numerical literal, the code will assert that one operand's register is equal to the given string literal and another assert statement will check that the operand's register is not equal to the given string literal. Finally, the code will emit an MCInstBuilder with the given Opcode and add all"
LLVM,RISCV,361,"The code will call the function emitToStreamer with an Out parameter and an MCInstBuilder object that builds an MCInst object with the Opcode and 4 operands from the Inst object's getOperand method, passing in <NUM_LIT> each time."
LLVM,RISCV,362,"return

MatchOperand_Success"
LLVM,RISCV,363,This code snippet does not have a next statement as the code ends after the "return true;" statement.
LLVM,RISCV,364,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specific code within the "parseDirectiveAttribute" function. The next statement could be anything that is specified within the function's code.
LLVM,RISCV,365,The next statement would likely involve an IF statement.
LLVM,RISCV,366,"return Match_Success ; }

The next statement will be the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,367,"Check if the expression is a constant, and if so, assign its value to the variable ""Imm""."
LLVM,RISCV,368,"if (IsConstant) {std::cout << ""Imm is a constant integer with value "" << Imm << std::endl;}
else {std::cout << ""Imm is not a constant"" << std::endl;}"
LLVM,RISCV,369,<s> assert ( N == <NUM_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,370,} }
LLVM,RISCV,371,"emitToStreamer ( Out, MCInstBuilder(ADDI) .addReg(DestReg) .addReg(DestReg) .addImm(Lo12));"
LLVM,RISCV,372,"The code will assert that STI has a feature and <STR_LIT>, and then assign ShiftAmount to be <NUM_LIT> plus the result of the findFirstSet function called with a uint64_t representation of Hi52, after which the end of the code block will be reached."
LLVM,RISCV,373,"VK = CE -> getKind ( ) ; }

Ret = VK;"
LLVM,RISCV,374,"if (Val->evaluateAsConstant(Imm)) {
  VK = VK_None;
  Ret = true;
}

""Val"" will be evaluated as a constant, setting ""Ret"" to true and ""VK"" to VK_None."
LLVM,RISCV,375,"if (IsValid) { 
    IsValid = getImmediateValue() < 10; 
}

The next statement would be:

return IsValid;"
LLVM,RISCV,376,This code snippet does not end with a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,377,"Imm = evaluateAsValue ( VK ) 
<ISA_LIT>MCExpr

return Imm;"
LLVM,RISCV,378,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  // Do something
} else {
  // Do something else
}"
LLVM,RISCV,379,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,380,"The next statement would be to return the boolean expression: 
""IsValid && (VK == MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None || VK == MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_LO || VK == MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_LO)."""
LLVM,RISCV,381,"else if ( ! Imm )
  IsValid = false;"
LLVM,RISCV,382,The code will return a boolean value indicating if the VariantKind is equal to either <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None or <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_LO.
LLVM,RISCV,383,"</s>

*IsValid = !IsConstantImm && (Imm != <NUM_LIT>) && isInt <<NUM_LIT>>(Imm);"
LLVM,RISCV,384,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,385,"""return true;"""
LLVM,RISCV,386,"</s>

 IsConstantImm is a constant immediate, the value of which is less than <NUM_LIT>, and VK equals EL1MCExpr::VK_EL1_None."
LLVM,RISCV,387,"</s>

<ISA_IMPLCCC>IsValid =  AsmParser :: IsConstantImm;"
LLVM,RISCV,388,return IsValid;
LLVM,RISCV,389,The code will evaluate whether the variable 'Imm' is a constant immediate and returns true if it is. It will also check if 'Imm' is an unsigned integer with size <NUM_LIT> and the VK variable is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None.
LLVM,RISCV,390,return IsConstantImm && isUInt64 (Imm) && VK == MCExpr :: VK_Intel_None;
LLVM,RISCV,391,This code snippet is likely checking if IsConstantImm is true and if the unsigned integer of size <NUM_LIT> is less than Imm. It then checks if Imm is not equal to <NUM_LIT> and if VK is equal to the VK_<ISA_LIT>_None constant in the MCExpr class. The next statement may involve an if statement or a return statement based on the result of these conditions.
LLVM,RISCV,392,It is likely that the next statement will declare a variable named "Imm" with the type "int64_t".
LLVM,RISCV,393,"The next statement could be a conditional statement where the value of IsConstantImm is checked in order to determine the next course of action for the program. For example:

if (IsConstantImm) {
    // Do something
} else {
    // Do something else
}"
LLVM,RISCV,394,return IsConstantImm;
LLVM,RISCV,395,"I am unsure what the code snippet is trying to achieve, therefore I cannot predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,396,"if <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_<ISA_LIT> {
    return true;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,397,"return (IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None) ? <EXPR_RESULT> : <EXPR_RESULT_SLOW> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,398,"</s>

return ( isRV64 ( ) && isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ) && isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,399,"return true ;

The next statement would be:
Parser.Lex();"
LLVM,RISCV,400,case AsmToken :: String;
LLVM,RISCV,401,"""SMLoc Loc = getLexer().getLoc(); getParser().eatToEndOfStatement(); return Error(Loc, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,402,"The next statement will be a conditional statement checking for the presence of parentheses and the success of parsing a memory operand, with a return statement if the conditions are met."
LLVM,RISCV,403,if (parseMemOpBaseReg (Operands) == MatchOperand_Success)
LLVM,RISCV,404,default: OS << "Unknown type" ;
LLVM,RISCV,405,The code snippet will emit the instruction to the streamer and return false.
LLVM,RISCV,406,"The next statement is likely to be: ""default: // handle default case"" This is because the code snippet includes a switch statement with cases for Register and Immediate, so it is likely that there is a default case included for handling other possible values of ""Kind""."
LLVM,RISCV,407,"if ( o . Shift > 0 ) { return o . Shift + 1 ; }


The code will move on to the ""default"" case in the switch statement, as there is no ""break"" statement after the return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,408,"return


Name != <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,409,"}

The next statement of the code snippet is a closing curly brace (})."
LLVM,RISCV,410,"Error ( Reg . StartLoc , <STR_LIT> )"
LLVM,RISCV,411,This statement is checking whether the variable "Reg" is between two specified values and also evaluates another condition.
LLVM,RISCV,412,"The next statement will be:

emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( <STR_LIT> ) . addOperand ( TmpReg ) . addExpr ( RefToLinkTmpLabel ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,413,"emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( SecondOpcode ) . addOperand ( DestReg ) . addOperand ( TmpReg ) . addExpr ( SymbolLo ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,414,">
if ( getObj"
LLVM,RISCV,415,"MCInst Inst2</s>

 = Inst.getOpcode();

return Inst2;"
LLVM,RISCV,416,"} </s>

The code snippet will emit an instruction to the streamer using the data provided in the sequence, adding a register and an immediate value depending on the opcode and destination register."
LLVM,RISCV,417,"}

The next statement will likely be another loop or conditional statement, as the current code snippet loops through a Seq array and performs different actions based on the value of the instruction's Opc."
LLVM,RISCV,418,It will return a StringRef object with the data and length from the System Registration.
LLVM,RISCV,419,"}

It is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the function is named ""getSysReg"" and is declared to return a StringRef. The assert statement may be checking that the Kind variable is equal to a certain value, possibly a system register, but the actual code for this is missing."
LLVM,RISCV,420,"bool IsConstantImm = evaluateConstantImm ( getImm ( ) , Imm , VK ) ; bool IsValid ; if ( ! IsConstantImm ) IsValid = <ISA_LIT>AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ; // Sets IsValid to the result of the AsmParser function call."
LLVM,RISCV,421,return <ISA_LIT>AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( Imm ) ; && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None ;
LLVM,RISCV,422,"</s>
The code will return false if the statement is not an immediate value or if the result of evaluating the constant immediate value is not true."
LLVM,RISCV,423,"</s>


""Int64_t Imm ; <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None ; is now set to the value of <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None."""
LLVM,RISCV,424,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the results of the conditions in the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,425,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,426,"if (IsConstantImm)
  return Imm;
else
  return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,427,"MCExpr *Expr = <ISA_LIT>create<ISA_LIT>CK(VK, Imm) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,428,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,429,"The next statement could be: if (VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_GOT_HI || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_TLS_GOT_HI || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_TLS_GD_HI ) {
return true; }"
LLVM,RISCV,430,<p>It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the contents of the functions "evaluateConstantImm" and "getImm".
LLVM,RISCV,431,"<\s>

False"
LLVM,RISCV,432,This code snippet appears to be checking for a specific register number and potentially adjusting it if certain conditions are met. The next statement could possibly involve checking the value of RegNo again or potentially assigning it to a different variable. More information is needed to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,433,"return MatchOperand_Success ;

The next statement could be a conditional statement checking if the next token in the code is an identifier."
LLVM,RISCV,434,<ISA_LIT>->addExplicitOperand ( <ISA_LIT>Operand :: createErrorOperand ( "Expected a register after the '
LLVM,RISCV,435,"Since this is the last statement, the next statement is likely to be the end of the switch case, followed by the end of the function or the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,436,The next statement will likely be a closing bracket to end the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,437,"The next statement is ""case <STR_LIT> : emitLoadStoreSymbol ( Inst , <STR_LIT> , IDLoc , Out , true ) ; return false ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,438,"}
The code will continue with the following statement:

errs() << <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,439,"}

The next statement in this code snippet would be an if statement that checks if the ABIName ends with a specific string and if the feature bits do not contain a certain value."
LLVM,RISCV,440,No prediction can be made without seeing the rest of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,441,"There are two cases in the switch statement, one for ""Register"" and one for ""Immediate"". If the Kind is ""Register"", then the value of o.Reg will be assigned to the variable Reg. If the Kind is ""Immediate"", then the value of o.Imm will be assigned to the variable Imm."
LLVM,RISCV,442,return MatchOperand_NoMatch;
LLVM,RISCV,443,bool IsRegFPR128 = <ISA_LIT>MCRegisterClasses [ <STR_LIT> ] . contains ( Reg ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,444,"The code is creating a new instruction to be added to the stream, which includes a reference to a temporary register and an expression that will be used as a symbol in the instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,445,"</s>

The next statement will create a new MCExpr, RefToLinkTmpLabel, using the specified operands."
LLVM,RISCV,446,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context about the code."
LLVM,RISCV,447,"if (Res) {
    ++<ISA_LIT>NumInstrsCompressed;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,448,"return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , <STR_LIT> , ErrorLoc, <STR_LIT> ) ; }

return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , - ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) , ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) - <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,449,"It is likely that the next statement will either be another conditional statement or a function call, such as a call to a helper function or a call to a built-in parser function."
LLVM,RISCV,450,"It will check if the VK value is equal to either MCExpr::VK_<_CALL or MCExpr::VK_<_CALL_PLT, and if so, call the classifySymbolRef function with the getImm() and Imm parameters, returning the result."
LLVM,RISCV,451,assert ( IsConstantImm && "Expected constant imm" ) ; <ISA_LIT>uint64_t Bits <ISA_LIT><<< There will be a check for whether Bits is equal to 12 </s>True or False depending on the value of Bits
LLVM,RISCV,452,return false
LLVM,RISCV,453,"return false;
} else {
return (Imm & 0xfffff000) == 0;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,454,"The next statement is a return statement that checks if the value of IsValid is true and if the value of VK is equal to one of the specified types. If both conditions are met, the overall return value is true."
LLVM,RISCV,455,return IsValid && (VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_HI || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_TPREL_HI);
LLVM,RISCV,456,"return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , <NUM_LIT> , ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) - <NUM_LIT> )>

Error ( ErrorLoc , <STR_LIT> )"
LLVM,RISCV,457,"RegNo is set to a new value based on the result of MatchRegisterAltName, and then checked to see if it is equal to a specific value. Ultimately, the function will return a bool value if RegNo is equal to a specific number."
LLVM,RISCV,458,"}

The next statement would likely be a return statement, as the code is completed with all necessary operations. The return value would depend on the values of IsRV32E and RegNo after the if statement. It is not included in the given code snippet, so it is impossible to accurately predict."
LLVM,RISCV,459,The code will return the MatchOperand_NoMatch value in the case that the AsmToken identifier has not been found.
LLVM,RISCV,460,"The next statement would likely be ""default: emitLoadStoreSymbol ( Inst , <STR_LIT> , IDLoc , Out , true ) ; return false ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,461,"if (checkPseudoAddTPRel(Inst, Operands))
  return true;
break;"
LLVM,RISCV,462,"</s>

The next statement will likely be to end the function and return the error message with the given parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,463,"The next statement will likely be an if statement or other conditional statement, which will check if the value of ErrorLoc is not within the range specified by Lower and Upper. If the value is out of range, the code will execute an error message using Msg and the value of ErrorLoc."
LLVM,RISCV,464,"</s>

<s>If the value of the boolean IsConstantImm variable is the result of evaluating the constant immediate value Imm with the supplied variable VK."
LLVM,RISCV,465,"Possible next statement:
else {
  // Handle non-constant immediate value
}"
LLVM,RISCV,466,"if IsValid == true:
    print(""Imm is an integer"")"
LLVM,RISCV,467,The next statement will check if VK is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_LAV_NONE or <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_LAV_LO and return the result of that comparison.
LLVM,RISCV,468,assert(Imm == <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,469,"""The value of the variable IsConstantImm is true and the result of the function isShiftedUInt with arguments <NUM_LIT> and <NUM_LIT> is also true for the variable Imm. Additionally, the value of Imm is not equal to <NUM_LIT> and the variable VK is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None."""
LLVM,RISCV,470,return IsConstantImm;
LLVM,RISCV,471,"""Imm is not a constant immediate value and VK is not equal to ISA_LIT MCExpr's VK_<ISA_LIT>_None variant."""
LLVM,RISCV,472,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  // do something
}"
LLVM,RISCV,473,"if(IsConstantImm){
  // Do something 
} else {
  // Do something else
}


The next statement would be ""if(IsConstantImm){""."
LLVM,RISCV,474,"MCExpr::isAbsolute() const {
  return VK == VK_ABS;
}""The isAbsolute() function will return true if the VariantKind VK is equal to VK_ABS, and false otherwise."""
LLVM,RISCV,475,"if (IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) && VK != <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None ) {
  # Do something
}"
LLVM,RISCV,476,return VK == MCExpr::VK_ARM_AMODEIMM && Imm == 0 && IsConstantImm;
LLVM,RISCV,477,"return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , - ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) , ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) - <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;
The next statement will be ""return generateImmOutOfRangeError(Operands, ErrorInfo, <NUM_LIT>, (<NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT>) - <NUM_LIT>, <STR_LIT>);"""
LLVM,RISCV,478,"return true ; }</s>

This code snippet is defining the ParseInstruction function for the AsmParser of a specific ISA. The function takes in an InstructionInfo object, a string reference for the instruction name, a SourceMgr location for the instruction name, and an OperandVector. The function then pushes back a new token operand with the instruction name and location, and checks to see if the instruction ends with a semicolon. If so, it returns false. If not, it parses the operands for the instruction. If there is a comma, it continues to parse more operands until it reaches the end of the statement. If there are any"
LLVM,RISCV,479,The next statement is most likely to be: "getLexer().Lex();"
LLVM,RISCV,480,if (parseSymbol(Operands) == MatchOperand_Success) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,481,The predicted statement is "return true;".
LLVM,RISCV,482,Create a new instance of the MCTargetAsmParser class using the provided parameters and set the available features based on the subtarget feature bits.
LLVM,RISCV,483,"}</s>

Add a new statement that checks if the instruction is a <STR_LIT> by adding an ""else if"" condition and executing the appropriate <STR_LIT> function."
LLVM,RISCV,484,"}

emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm + <STR_LIT>));"
LLVM,RISCV,485,The statement after this code snippet will most likely be another condition or an "else" statement to handle remaining cases.
LLVM,RISCV,486,MatchOperand_NoMatch
LLVM,RISCV,487,"return false ;

""SMLoc Loc = getLexer().getLoc(); return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,488,case 'z' : Imm |= "abc"; break;
LLVM,RISCV,489,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(N));
LLVM,RISCV,490,"return Op ;

return Op;"
LLVM,RISCV,491,"return Op ;

The next statement is ""return Op;""."
LLVM,RISCV,492,"emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( Inst . Opc ) . addReg ( DestReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg ) . addImm ( Inst . Imm ) ) ; SrcReg = DestReg ;"
LLVM,RISCV,493,"The next statement would be to call the ""emitToStreamer"" function again, this time with four operands instead of two, using the ""addOperand"" method to add each operand from the ""Inst"" instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,494,The next statement will involve emitting instructions to the streamer using the previously defined MCInstBuilder and adding operands and registers to them.
LLVM,RISCV,495,The next statement will likely be a closing curly bracket to complete the return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,496,"}

True"
LLVM,RISCV,497,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the context and the code surrounding the given code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,498,"return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , - ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) , ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) - <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ) ;


The next statement could be another case statement for handling invalid immediate values."
LLVM,RISCV,499,The next statement would be: getParser().Lex();
LLVM,RISCV,500,"""Operand must be ""
a register or a constant expression."
LLVM,RISCV,501,MatchOperand_Success
LLVM,RISCV,502,"Error ( getLoc ( ) , Invalidoperand ) ; return MatchOperand_ParseFail}

The next statement is: if ( ! isa < MCExprConstant > ( V ) ) { Error ( getLoc ( ) , Invalidoperand ) ; return MatchOperand_ParseFail }."
LLVM,RISCV,503,The next statement is: return Res;
LLVM,RISCV,504,The code will return an operand of type "MatchOperand_Success" and push it onto the "Operands" vector.
LLVM,RISCV,505,"}

The next statement of this code snippet is getTargetStreamer().emitTextAttribute(Tag, ISAInfo->toString()). This statement checks if the Tag is not equal to <STR_LIT> and if it is not, it will emit a text attribute with the Tag and the value of ISAInfo converted to a string. If the Tag is equal to <STR_LIT>, it will create a vector of strings called FeatureVector using the getSTI() function and the getFeatureBits() function. It will then set the value of XLen to <NUM_LIT> if the getFeatureBits() function returns true, or <"
LLVM,RISCV,506,"if (getParser().checkExpression(Res))
    return MatchOperand_ParseFail;"
LLVM,RISCV,507,"The code may return an <ISA_LIT>Operand with the specified RegNo, S, E and isRV64() parameters pushed to the Operands vector for further processing."
LLVM,RISCV,508,return MatchOperand_Success;
LLVM,RISCV,509,"if (getNameRegNum(SymRef, Name, RegNo))if (RegNo > 0)<s>


the code will return MatchOperand_NoMatch if RegNo is greater than 0"
LLVM,RISCV,510,"return <NUM_LIT>

MatchOperand_NoMatch"
LLVM,RISCV,511,The code will proceed to execute the while loop since both conditions for the if statements are not satisfied.
LLVM,RISCV,512,The next statement would be to check if the ABI name ends with a specified string and if the value of a specific feature in the STI object is false.
LLVM,RISCV,513,"The next statement would most likely be:
- Op->EndLoc = E;"
LLVM,RISCV,514,Op -> Val = Tok.getNumVal();
LLVM,RISCV,515,return VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None && IsValid
LLVM,RISCV,516,"</s>

The next statement could be:

if (IsConstantImm) { 
  IsValid = true; 
} 
else 
{ 
  IsValid = false; 
}"
LLVM,RISCV,517,It is expected that the code will return a boolean expression containing the values IsValid and VK.
LLVM,RISCV,518,"If the condition is not met, then the IsValid variable will be set to the result of calling the ""classifySymbolRef"" function with the arguments of ""getImm()"", ""VK"", and ""Imm""."
LLVM,RISCV,519,"""The function will return true if the input is a constant value. It will also check if the input value is a 12-bit unsigned integer and if the VariantKind is VK_<ISA_LIT>_None."""
LLVM,RISCV,520,It is likely that the next statement will check if VK is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None.
LLVM,RISCV,521,"IsValid = <ISA_LIT>AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,522,"Possible next statement:

return IsValid;"
LLVM,RISCV,523,return IsConstantImm && isUInt <2> (Imm) && VK == MCExpr::VK_VC_None;
LLVM,RISCV,524,"</s>

if (IsConstantImm) {
    if (MCExpr::VariantKind == VK_PPC_LO) {
        return true;
    }
}

The next statement will check if the evaluated constant immediate is of variant kind VK_PPC_LO and return true if it is."
LLVM,RISCV,525,The code will exit the switch statement and continue to the next line of code.
LLVM,RISCV,526,The next statement could be "getParser().parseIdentifier(Identifier)".
LLVM,RISCV,527,"""SMLoc Loc = getLexer().getLoc();"""
LLVM,RISCV,528,Error: Missing closing statement.
LLVM,RISCV,529,"Error ( getLoc ( ) , <STR_LIT> ) ; return MatchOperand_ParseFail ; }

return MatchOperand_Success"
LLVM,RISCV,530,"The code snippet is likely to continue with another if statement checking for another token before pushing it onto the Operands vector. Alternatively, it may continue with another action that is dependent on the successful parsing of the operands."
LLVM,RISCV,531,"It looks like this code snippet is trying to check if the lexer is on the open parenthesis token and if so, it will attempt to parse a memory operand base register. If successful, it will return true, but if not, it will return false. If there is an error at the current location, it will return true. Since the last statement is a return, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of this function or the beginning of another condition or loop."
LLVM,RISCV,532,Success.
LLVM,RISCV,533,"return MatchOperand_ParseFail ; }

Next, the code will check if the current token is equal to LParen. If it is not, an error will be thrown and the function will return MatchOperand_ParseFail. If it is, the code will call getParser().Lex() and then parse the subexpression enclosed in parentheses using the variable SubExpr. If the parse is successful, the function will return MatchOperand_ParseFail."
LLVM,RISCV,534,return MatchOperand_NoMatch;
LLVM,RISCV,535,The code snippet will call the function "setAvailableFeatures" with the argument of the result from calling the function "ComputeAvailableFeatures" on the output of STI's "getFeatureBits" function.
LLVM,RISCV,536,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing what the functions ""setAvailableFeatures"", ""ComputeAvailableFeatures"", and ""STI.getFeatureBits()"" do."
LLVM,RISCV,537,"}>

The next statement will be the closing bracket ""}"" to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,538,"<sml> return generateImmOutOfRangeError(Operands, ErrorInfo, <T/p>Num, (<T/p>Num << <T/p>Num) - <Ens>, <STR_LIT>)"
LLVM,RISCV,539,The next statement is likely a conditional statement that checks if the boolean variable "IsValid" is true and returns the result of the conditional expression after the && operator.
LLVM,RISCV,540,"if (IsValid) {
    // Do something
}"
LLVM,RISCV,541,"</s>

if ( PT.getOpcode() == MCInstrInfo::CALL )"
LLVM,RISCV,542,The next statement is: return IsConstantImm && isInt < 64 > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != 0 ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK_Mips_ABS_LO16_None ;
LLVM,RISCV,543,"It is likely that the next statement will involve using the evaluated constant immediate value in some way, such as assigning it to a variable or using it in a conditional statement. For example, ""if (IsConstantImm) { // do something with Imm }"" or ""ConstantImmValue = evaluateConstantImm(Imm, VK);"""
LLVM,RISCV,544,"</s

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,545,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,546,"} else { <ISA_LIT>// is this a 20-bit immediate? return <ISA_LIT>(( (Imm <ISA_LIT>- 1) <ISA_LIT>& ((1 <ISA_LIT>- (1 <ISA_LIT>- Imm) <ISA_LIT>& 0), <ISA_LIT>(Imm | (1 <ISA_LIT>- Imm <ISA_LIT>&<ISA_LIT>0x3ff <ISA_LIT>)) == 0));

return ((Imm + 1) & ((1 - (1 - Imm) & 0), (Imm | (1 - Imm"
LLVM,RISCV,547,">
This code snippet returns an error statement."
LLVM,RISCV,548,};
LLVM,RISCV,549,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,550,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,551,The next statement will likely be a return statement that checks if the variable VK is equal to either <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None or <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_LO.
LLVM,RISCV,552,TRUE
LLVM,RISCV,553,"In the next statement, it will continue with the next case, which could be another ""Match_InvalidSImm12"" or ""Match_InvalidSImm12Lsb0"" with different operands and error information."
LLVM,RISCV,554,"The next statement will be a call to the ""Lex"" function of the parser, followed by a return statement that returns the boolean value ""false""."
LLVM,RISCV,555,"return false ;

false"
LLVM,RISCV,556,"if (isRV64()) {
  Imm = SignExtend64 <<NUM_LIT>>(Imm);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,557,"SrcReg = Inst . getRegOperand ( ) < /STR_LIT>

The next statement could be:
if (SrcReg == <STR_LIT>) { // do something }"
LLVM,RISCV,558,"The next statement would be: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm + 1));"
LLVM,RISCV,559,"emitLoadStoreSymbol ( Inst , <STR_LIT> , IDLoc , Out , true ) ; return false

return false"
LLVM,RISCV,560,The next statement will likely be a break or default statement to end the switch case. It may also include closing braces if there are any nested cases.
LLVM,RISCV,561,The next statement is: "Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Imm + 1));"
LLVM,RISCV,562,The code will check if the immediate value is a constant and store the result in the variable "IsConstant".
LLVM,RISCV,563,The next statement is "unsigned Opcode = Inst.getOpcode();"
LLVM,RISCV,564,"The next statement will check the condition ( TargetFlags & <STR_LIT> ) && ( DestReg == <STR_LIT> ) and if it is true, it will check the opcode of the instruction. If the opcode is <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, or <STR_LIT>, it will return an error with the location and a specific string. If the second condition is not met, it will continue to the next if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,565,"Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(VReg,VType.RegisterClass));"
LLVM,RISCV,566,<s> Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createImm ( VType . Data ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,567,"Op -> VType . Encoding = ( SewLog2 << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( LmulLog2 << <NUM_LIT> ) ; }

return Op;"
LLVM,RISCV,568,Op -> VType . Encoding |= <NUM_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,569,"return <STR_LIT> ; 

default: return ""Invalid input."";"
LLVM,RISCV,570,"return <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement would be ""default: return <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,571,"Buf . append ( <STR_LIT>

<STR_LIT> Value Type ( VType )"
LLVM,RISCV,572,"}</s>

It is likely that the next statement will append the value of the Lmul variable to the end of the Buf string."
LLVM,RISCV,573,"The next statement will be ""case Match_InvalidFRMArg: { SMLoc ErrorLoc = ((<ISA_LIT>Operand&) *Operands[ErrorInfo]).getStartLoc(); return Error(ErrorLoc, <STR_LIT>); }""."
LLVM,RISCV,574,"Error ( getLoc ( ), ""Expected mask register"" ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,575,TailAgnostic = Name.consume_front(<STR_LIT>); if (TailAgnostic != true && TailAgnostic != false) return MatchOperand_NoMatch;
LLVM,RISCV,576,The next statement will be: "CheckReg = Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg();"
LLVM,RISCV,577,"if (Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).isReg() && CheckReg == DestReg) {
  return Error(Loc, ""Target register cannot be the same as destination register"");
}"
LLVM,RISCV,578,"}


Op.Reg.RegNum += 1"
LLVM,RISCV,579,"The next statement may involve performing some kind of operation or evaluation on the values of N, <NUM_LIT>, and <STR_LIT>, possibly using the assert statement to ensure that all values are equal or meet certain conditions. It may also involve declaring or defining variables or calling functions."
LLVM,RISCV,580,The next statement will likely be an "if" statement or some other type of conditional statement to check whether the assertion is true or false.
LLVM,RISCV,581,"</s>

The next statement is ""return false;""."
LLVM,RISCV,582,"""return Op;"""
LLVM,RISCV,583,"<s> Out . emitLabel ( TmpLabel ) ; const <ISA_LIT>MCExpr * SymbolLo = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: create ( Symbol , VKLo , Ctx ) ; emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( <STR_LIT> ) . addOperand ( TmpReg ) . addExpr ( SymbolLo ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,584,"RefToLinkTmpLabel->print(out.s()) ;

RefToLinkTmpLabel->dump() ;"
LLVM,RISCV,585,"The emitAuipccInstPair function will be called with the arguments DestReg, DestReg, Symbol, MCExpr::VK_RISCV_CAPTAB_PCREL_HI, <NUM_LIT>, IDLoc, and Out."
LLVM,RISCV,586,<s> // This statement does not have a certain prediction as it depends on the return value of the function isRV64.
LLVM,RISCV,587,The next statement would likely involve manipulating or using the variable "Symbol" in some way.
LLVM,RISCV,588,"void <ISA_LIT>AsmParser :: emitCapLoadPCRelCap ( MCInst & Inst , SMLoc IDLoc , MCStreamer & Out ) { MCOperand DestReg = Inst . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; const MCExpr * Symbol = Inst . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getExpr ( ) ; emitAUIPCCInstPair ( DestReg , DestReg , Symbol , <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_LO , <STR_LIT> , IDLoc , Out ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,589,"The next statement would be to call the function ""emitAuipccInstPair"" passing in the variables ""DestReg"", ""DestReg"", ""Symbol"", ""MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_TLS_GD_CAPTAB_PCREL_HI"", ""<STR_LIT>"", ""IDLoc"", and ""Out""."
LLVM,RISCV,590,"Out
Next, the code will emit a function or instruction pair using the destination registers, a symbol, an MCExpr value, and the value MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_TLS_GD_CAPTAB_PCREL_HI (which may be related to Thread Local Storage) from the location specified in IDLoc. This instruction will be added to the output stream, Out."
LLVM,RISCV,591,"</s>

// Emit the instruction opcode.

Out.EmitInstruction(""cap_load_tlsie_addr"");"
LLVM,RISCV,592,"}

The next statement is likely to involve some sort of function call or the use of a previously defined variable."
LLVM,RISCV,593,The next statement is likely to be the opening curly bracket for the function: "{"
LLVM,RISCV,594,It is likely that the next statement will return a value indicating the classification of the symbol reference and whether it corresponds to a special VK code for a CCALL expression.
LLVM,RISCV,595,"if ( SymbolId == 0 ) {
    return false;
  } else {
    Imm = getImm(CCOperand, APInt(64, true));
    return (getImm(CCOperand, APInt(64, true)) == IMM);
  }

The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to end the isCCallSymbol function."
LLVM,RISCV,596,The next statement will access an element at index <STR_LIT> in the array returned by the getFeatureBits() method of the getSTI() object and return it.
LLVM,RISCV,597,The next statement will check if the Reg variable's register number is contained within the MCRegisterClasses array.
LLVM,RISCV,598,The next statement will return true if the classification of the symbol reference is MCExpr while the Variant Kind is VK.
LLVM,RISCV,599,"}

False"
LLVM,RISCV,600,"</s>

I'm sorry, I cannot predict an accurate output for this code snippet as it lacks context and context is crucial for determining the logical flow of a program."
LLVM,RISCV,601,"return X86II :: getMemoryOperandNo ( Op ) == X86 :: AddrBaseReg && ( L >> 3 ) & 1 ;
The code checks if the target processor is a TPRelCIncOffset symbol and returns true if it is an address base register and the left-shift is 1."
LLVM,RISCV,602,The next statement will likely involve checking the value of the expression and determining if it is a shifted unsigned integer with a specific value and verifying that the VK value is set to a specified value for the <ISA_LIT>MCExpr.
LLVM,RISCV,603,Imm = 10;
LLVM,RISCV,604,"If the variable VK is equal to the value <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None and the variable Imm is an unsigned integer of size <NUM_LIT>, then the statement will return a boolean value stating whether or not IsConstantImm is true."
LLVM,RISCV,605,The next statement would be a conditional statement checking if the VK variable is equal to the <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None value.
LLVM,RISCV,606,VK.setImm(true);
LLVM,RISCV,607,The next statement of this code snippet is a return statement that checks if IsValid is true and the value of VK is one of the listed expressions.
LLVM,RISCV,608,The code snippet will return whether IsValid is true and VK is equal to one of the <ISA_LIT>MCExpr values listed.
LLVM,RISCV,609,"e=0; </s>



There could be many possible outcomes, depending on the specific context of the code. Here are a few potential predictions:

1. The next statement could be a line of code that uses the variable `Imm` in some way, such as assigning a value to it or using it in a calculation.

2. The next statement could be a conditional statement that checks the value of `Imm` and executes different code depending on whether it is equal to 0 or not.

3. The next statement could be a loop that repeats a certain block of code `Imm` times.

4. The next statement could"
LLVM,RISCV,610,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  return Imm;
} else {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,611,MatchOperand_Success
LLVM,RISCV,612,"""Res = ISA_LITMCExpr :: create ( Res , Kind , getContext ( ) ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,613,"return Error ( Parser . getTok ( ) . getLoc ( ) , <STR_LIT> ) ;

There is no next statement, as the code snippet would have reached the end."
LLVM,RISCV,614,"return false ; }
return false"
LLVM,RISCV,615,"The next statement will likely check if the expression is a symbol reference and if it is not, then output an error message and return a failure for the match operand."
LLVM,RISCV,616,"}


The next statement would return MatchOperand_ParseFail."
LLVM,RISCV,617,The next statement would be case AsmToken :: IntVal :.
LLVM,RISCV,618,"OS << <STR_LIT> << getSpecialCapReg ( ) << '>' ; break ; }

The statement could be a continuation of the switch statement, potentially checking for another KindTy case."
LLVM,RISCV,619,case KindTy ::
LLVM,RISCV,620,"return false ;

emitLoadStoreSymbol(Inst, <STR_LIT>, IDLoc, Out, false);"
LLVM,RISCV,621,"unimplemented ()

This code snippet is part of a larger function, but it appears to be implementing a switch statement with many different cases. The next statement could be another case or a break statement, depending on the value of the switch expression."
LLVM,RISCV,622,The next statement is a return statement that evaluates whether IsValid is true and if VK is equal to <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI or <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_GOT_HI. It is part of the else condition.
LLVM,RISCV,623,"""return IsValid && ( VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI || VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_GOT_HI )"""
LLVM,RISCV,624,"emitLoadGlobalAddress ( Inst , IDLoc , Out ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,625,"} }

Error"
LLVM,RISCV,626,"}


The next statement will be ""default: llvm_unreachable ( ""Unexpected operand specifier for matching in multi-operand match group!"" );"""
LLVM,RISCV,627,The next statement will likely check if the expression on the right side of the equal sign evaluates to true.
LLVM,RISCV,628,return Op;
LLVM,RISCV,629,Op->IsRV128 = IsRV128;
LLVM,RISCV,630,There are no further statements in this code snippet. The next statement would be the end of the switch statement (denoted by the closing curly brace).
LLVM,RISCV,631,"return <STR_LIT> ; default: return <STR_LIT> }</s>

This code snippet seems to be defining a switch statement with multiple cases. The next line would most likely contain a ""break"" statement to end the switch statement, followed by more code."
LLVM,RISCV,632,"Since there is no additional code after the last case statement, the next statement would likely be the end of the code block or the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,633,The next statement will probably convert the constant expression represented by vtypei into a string and store it in a new variable.
LLVM,RISCV,634,The next statement could be a function call or a return statement as no declarations or assignments are present.
LLVM,RISCV,635,bool isConstantUImm7 ( ) const;
LLVM,RISCV,636,"if (Kind == KindTy :: VectorRegister
) {
  std::cout << ""The register is a vector register."";
}"
LLVM,RISCV,637,return Kind == KindTy :: VType ]
LLVM,RISCV,638,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,639,"This code snippet defines a function called parseOperand that takes in a vector of operands and a mnemonic as parameters. It then declares a variable called Result that is assigned the result of a function called MatchOperandParserImpl. It then checks if the Result is equal to MatchOperand_Success and if it is, it returns false. If the Result is equal to MatchOperand_ParseFail, then it returns true. If the mnemonic is equal to any of the specified strings, then it executes another function called parseRegisterV0asV0T and if that is successful, it returns false. If not, it goes on to check if the function"
LLVM,RISCV,640,if ( HadParens ) getLexer ( ) . UnLex ( LParen ) ; return MatchOperand_NoMatch ;
LLVM,RISCV,641,I cannot predict the next statement without further context as the code snippet is not complete.
LLVM,RISCV,642,if (Name == "foo") { return MatchOperand_Success; }
LLVM,RISCV,643,"getLexer ( ) . Lex ( ) ;

The next statement is a conditional statement checking if the Lexer is at the end of the statement."
LLVM,RISCV,644,"</s>

case KindTy :: Offset : OS << <STR_LIT> << getOffset ( ) << <STR_LIT> ; break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,645,"<STR_LIT>

break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,646,"""
This code snippet defines a function that takes a reference to another <ISA_LIT>Operand object and creates a copy of it. It sets the Kind, IsRV64, StartLoc, and EndLoc variables to match the original object. It then uses a switch statement to determine the kind of operand and sets the corresponding variable to match the original object."
LLVM,RISCV,647,"break ; case KindTy :: Symbol : Sym = o . Sym ; break ; }

Switch(KindTy :: VectorRegister)"
LLVM,RISCV,648,No next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,649,The next statement will be "return MatchOperand_Success;".
LLVM,RISCV,650,The code will return MatchOperand_ParseFail if the lexer kind is not AsmToken::Identifier.
LLVM,RISCV,651,getLexer().Lex();
LLVM,RISCV,652,"If HadParens is true, then the code will push a new operand (represented by <ISA_LIT>Operand::createToken(<STR_LIT>, FirstS)) onto the Operands vector. If HadParens is false, the code will return a MatchOperand_NoMatch value."
LLVM,RISCV,653,"return Error ( ErrorLoc , <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ) ; }

The next statement would be:
case Match_InvalidVSetvlImmediate : return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , <NUM_LIT> , ( <NUM_LIT> & <NUM_LIT> ) - <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,654,None. The code is incomplete and ends with a semicolon (;) for the final case statement. It does not contain any further statements.
LLVM,RISCV,655,The next statement would likely check if the value of VK is equal to ISA_LITMCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None.
LLVM,RISCV,656,"if (IsConstantImm && IsInRange) {
  return true;
} else {
  return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,657,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,658,The next statement would be: "return RegNo == <NUM_LIT> ;" This would return a boolean value indicating whether the variable RegNo is equal to the numerical literal <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,659,"}

The next statement will be ""}"" to close the previous if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,660,">=

bool IsRegFPR64 = <ISA_LIT>MCRegisterClasses[<STR_LIT>].contains(Reg);"
LLVM,RISCV,661,"""return Match_InvalidOperand;"""
LLVM,RISCV,662,">

The next statement will likely involve declaring a StringRef variable called ""Identifier"" and assigning it some value from the code or function."
LLVM,RISCV,663,"if ( getLexer ( ) . getKind ( ) == AsmToken :: ColonColon )

""The next statement assigns the value of Kind to a new variable called Res, using the function create from the class MCSymbolRefExpr with the parameters Sym, VK_None, and getContext()."""
LLVM,RISCV,664,return MatchOperand_NoMatch
LLVM,RISCV,665,getLexer().UnLex(Buf[<NUM_LIT>])
LLVM,RISCV,666,"</s>

if (isIPF()) return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,667,"</s>

The next statement will use the ""IsConstantImm"" variable to check if the function returned false, and then evaluate the constant for the ImmXLen."
LLVM,RISCV,668,"}

case Match_InvalidJ_Type : return generateImmOutOfRangeError (Operands, ErrorInfo, -(<NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT>), (<NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT>) - <NUM_LIT>, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,669,"The next statement is Operands . push_back (<ISA_LIT>Operand :: createImm ( Res , S , E , isRV64 ( ) ) ) ; which adds a new expression to the <ISA_LIT>Operand list."
LLVM,RISCV,670,"return false

The next statement would likely be another case statement for <STR_LIT>, followed by a corresponding function call and return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,671,Op -> VType . PostShuffleInPlace = true;
LLVM,RISCV,672,<s> }
LLVM,RISCV,673,"The next statement will be:
isConstantImm = evaluateConstantImm(getImm(), Imm, VK);"
LLVM,RISCV,674,"""if (IsConstantImm) return true;"""
LLVM,RISCV,675,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement or a return statement that checks the validity of the immediate operand and its corresponding variant kind.
LLVM,RISCV,676,None. This statement marks the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,677,return false
LLVM,RISCV,678,"if (IsValid) {
  // do something
}"
LLVM,RISCV,679,"return ( ( Imm < 64L && Imm >= 0L ) || VK ) ;



This code snippet does not provide enough context for a prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,680,"if (IsConstantImm) {
  // Do something with Imm
} else {
  // Imm is not a constant value
}"
LLVM,RISCV,681,if (isImm() && IsConstantImm) IsValid = true;
LLVM,RISCV,682,"The next statement will check if the next token is an opening parenthesis, and if not, it will return a failure in parsing the operand."
LLVM,RISCV,683,"}

If the getSTI().getFeatureBits()[<STR_LIT>] condition evaluates to False, the next statement will check if the lexer is currently at the beginning of a parentheses and return the opposite of the parseMemOpBaseReg(Operands) function's output."
LLVM,RISCV,684,"</s>

False"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,685,"</s>

The next statement could possibly be to close the function or to return a value."
LLVM,RISCV,686,"The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,687,"""Error: isU32Imm is not defined."""
LLVM,RISCV,688,"if (IsConstantImm) {
    // Do something with Imm and VK
} else {
    return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,689,"}

Get the parser and call Lex."
LLVM,RISCV,690,This code snippet is likely part of a function that evaluates an MCExpr and returns a boolean. The next statement may involve checking the result of this function and handling any errors or returning a different value.
LLVM,RISCV,691,return <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None_Addr;
LLVM,RISCV,692,"if (IsReversible && isInt<NUM_LIT>(Imm) && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None) {
  return IsReversible;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,693,The next statement could possibly be assigning a value to the variable VK using the VariantKind data type.
LLVM,RISCV,694,"return ( VK == VK_UImm8 ) ; }


return Imm == VK_UImm8;"
LLVM,RISCV,695,Op->setSExtWidth(Sew);
LLVM,RISCV,696,There will likely be a statement related to a "default" case or a closing brace for the switch statement. For example: "default: return null;" or "}".
LLVM,RISCV,697,break;
LLVM,RISCV,698,It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet provided does not contain enough information or context. It could be a continuation of a larger code block or could be the end of a switch statement. The next statement could also be an error or exception if the code is incomplete.
LLVM,RISCV,699,">

It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables in the code, but it will likely involve another conditional statement or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,700,"return true ; }</s>

This code snippet checks the validity of an instruction and returns true if the instruction is valid."
LLVM,RISCV,701,"if ( DestReg == MaskReg ) return Error ( Loc , <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ) ; } }

The next statement is: <s> return Success;"
LLVM,RISCV,702,return false
LLVM,RISCV,703,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be an if statement or conditional statement that performs some action based on the value of the boolean variable IsConstantImm."
LLVM,RISCV,704,return IsConstantImm
LLVM,RISCV,705,"if (IsValid) {
    return VK == MCEXPR::VK_<ISA_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,706,"Error ( getLoc ( ) , <STR_LIT> ) ; return MatchOperand_ParseFail ; }

Return MatchOperand_ParseFail."
LLVM,RISCV,707,"if ( Result == MatchOperand_Success ) return false; if ( Result == MatchOperand_ParseFail ) return true; if ( parseRegister(Operands, true) == MatchOperand_Success)"
LLVM,RISCV,708,"The next statement will be an 'else if' statement, or the code will continue executing outside of the if/else statement block."
LLVM,RISCV,709,"case ';' : continue ; }

The next statement would likely either be a break statement, a continue statement, or the end of the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,710,"The next statement would likely be:
case 's' : Imm |= <STR_LIT> ; break;"
LLVM,RISCV,711,"The next statement of the code snippet will check if the binary expression has a subtraction or addition opcode, and if it does not, it will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,712,The code snippet is incomplete and cannot be used to make an accurate prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,713,Op->Reg.RegNum = RegNo;
LLVM,RISCV,714,Op
LLVM,RISCV,715,The statement might assign a value to a variable called "IsRV64".
LLVM,RISCV,716,"The code will emit a MCInstBuilder to the streamer with a source register, destination register, and immediate value as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,717,The next statement is likely to be another call to the "emitToStreamer" function with a new set of arguments.
LLVM,RISCV,718,"The next statement is likely an instruction to execute the CInst or Res instruction, depending on the result of the condition (Res)."
LLVM,RISCV,719,"The next statement is likely to involve the variable Res, possibly using its boolean value to determine further actions in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,720,"Given the current information, it is likely that the next statement will output the value of Imm.Val."
LLVM,RISCV,721,The code will return the value of the register number with an assert statement.
LLVM,RISCV,722,"}</s>

The next statement will return a reference to the System Register with the data and length specified in the input."
LLVM,RISCV,723,return StringRef();
LLVM,RISCV,724,if (IsValid) NextStatement();
LLVM,RISCV,725,return false
LLVM,RISCV,726,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks if the variables IsConstantImm, Imm, isUInt, and VK are all equal to specific values."
LLVM,RISCV,727,"The next statement of this code snippet could be a conditional statement or an assignment statement, depending on the context of the code. It could also be a return statement if the current statement is within a function."
LLVM,RISCV,728,"if the previous statement returns false, then the next statement would likely return false as well."
LLVM,RISCV,729,"}

The next statement could be to check whether the char c is equal to '\0'. If so, the loop will continue, and if not, it will move on to the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,730,The next statement would be: return true;
LLVM,RISCV,731,"}

The next statement is likely to involve the evaluation of the ""Kind"" variable as a boolean value."
LLVM,RISCV,732,"R -- return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != <<NUM_LIT>> ) && isShiftedInt <<NUM_LIT>> , <<NUM_LIT>> > ( Imm ) && VK == <<ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None ;"
LLVM,RISCV,733,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,734,"<s>

 true"
LLVM,RISCV,735,"""return false"""
LLVM,RISCV,736,No next statement is given as this is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,737,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context. The keyword ""const"" suggests that the next statement may involve a constant or non-changing value, but without more information it is impossible to determine the exact statement."
LLVM,RISCV,738,It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is not enough information provided.
LLVM,RISCV,739,"if ( ! isPtr() ) {
  Imm = 0;
  VK = MCExpr::VK_MergedValue;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,740,"... 

Error checking failed."
LLVM,RISCV,741,"}

return IsValid && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_LO"
LLVM,RISCV,742,> return (VK==VK_UImm5) && (Imm!=0)
LLVM,RISCV,743,"IsConstantImm

false"
LLVM,RISCV,744,"The next statement would be ""if (IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) && VK == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None) {""."
LLVM,RISCV,745,It is likely that the code will continue to perform some sort of conditional check or comparison using the returned values and declared variables.
LLVM,RISCV,746,"The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, marking the end of the ""if"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,747,The next statement will likely be the closing curly brace for the function.
LLVM,RISCV,748,The next statement will be "return ( isRV64 ( ) && isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ) || isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,749,``Initialize the ISA_LIT AsmParser as the X target for the 32-bit target``
LLVM,RISCV,750,The next statement of this code snippet is "return MatchOperand_Success;".
LLVM,RISCV,751,MatchOperand_NoMatch_nextNode
LLVM,RISCV,752,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,753,This code snippet assigns the value of the string stored in DirectiveID to the variable IDVal using the getString() method.
LLVM,RISCV,754,"Possible options include: emit warning with parameters (<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>), and eat to the end of the statement."
LLVM,RISCV,755,"In the next statement, the program will return the result of parsing the operand with a modifier from the given operands."
LLVM,RISCV,756,The next statement could be "MAB . setForceRelocs ( ) ;" followed by the closing curly braces for the current block.
LLVM,RISCV,757,"""Create a new MCExpr with ModExpr using the SubExpr and a specified context."""
LLVM,RISCV,758,return MatchOperand_NoMatch ;
LLVM,RISCV,759,FeatureBitSet copySTI() = copy of the FeatureBitSet with new values.
LLVM,RISCV,760,There will likely be a default case that prints an error message or does nothing.
LLVM,RISCV,761,No statement is expected. This is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,762,"}</s>

The next statement would likely be another ""if"" statement checking for a different condition."
LLVM,RISCV,763,"Parser . addAliasForDirective ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,764,"</s>

The next statement would likely define the constructor for the AsmParser class, which would take in the parameters of MCSubtargetInfo, MCAsmParser, MCInstrInfo, and MCTargetOptions. This constructor would also initialize the MCTargetAsmParser class, passing in the Options, STI, and MII parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,765,"default:
unknown instruction"
LLVM,RISCV,766,"else {
  return Match_InvalidOperand;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,767,The next statement would be: Stubs.clear(); }
LLVM,RISCV,768,"</s>

The next statement is most likely closing curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,769,Prints the string "mi".
LLVM,RISCV,770,"This code snippet creates an MCExpr object, sets the size based on the data layout, and then emits the value of the expression using the allocated size."
LLVM,RISCV,771,"}


<S> default: return MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_None ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,772,A.Run();
LLVM,RISCV,773,No statement can be predicted since the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information.
LLVM,RISCV,774,The next statement of this code snippet will be a closing brace to end the function.
LLVM,RISCV,775,"</s>

getRegisterName function will be used to retrieve the register name of the operand at the specified index."
LLVM,RISCV,776,"This statement prints the register name of the operand in the current machine instruction to the output stream, followed by the string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,777,"""The code will switch based on the type of MO, either a MachineOperand register or immediate, and then will execute the appropriate case statement."""
LLVM,RISCV,778,"""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,779,"</s>

We cannot determine the next statement as the snippet is incomplete. It looks like the next statement may involve setting a variable's value or calling a function, but the code-ending tokens are missing, making it impossible to know for sure."
LLVM,RISCV,780,The next statement is most likely a code block starting with curly braces.
LLVM,RISCV,781,This code snippet is likely a part of a program that translates a lower-level language (possibly Assembly) to a higher-level language (possibly C or C++). The next statement will likely be another function call or a return statement to complete the translation process.
LLVM,RISCV,782,A statement to increment the variable NumInstrsCompressed.
LLVM,RISCV,783,"if ( Res ) {
    ++ <ISA_LIT>NumInstrsCompressed;
} else {
    <ISA_LIT>NumInstrsCompressed = 0;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,784,This code snippet creates a new AsmPrinter object using the provided TargetMachine and MCStreamer and passes them to the AsmPrinter constructor.
LLVM,RISCV,785,"social]

""This code creates a new instance of the AsmPrinter class with a unique target machine and a unique MCStreamer, inheriting from the AsmPrinter class."""
LLVM,RISCV,786,"llvm :: <OS_MATCH_TYPE>raw_ostream & OS = * OutStreamer ; </ISA_LIT>

return;"
LLVM,RISCV,787,AsmPrinter :: OutStreamer -> Flush ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,788,"if ( Res ) { 

if (Res) { 
OutStreamer->EmitInstruction(CInst, *TM.getMCSubtargetInfo()); } }"
LLVM,RISCV,789,"}</s>

The RegisterAsmPrinter < <ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter > Z ( getThe<ISA_LIT>128Target ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,790,"}

The next statement would be calling the RegisterAsmPrinter function with the parameter X."
LLVM,RISCV,791,if ( MO.getImm() != <NUM_LIT> ) report_fatal_error ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,792,"}

if (ExtraCode) {return false;}"
LLVM,RISCV,793,"//

OS << MO;"
LLVM,RISCV,794,"""The code snippet will enter the 'default' case and then end the switch statement before moving on to the next block of code."""
LLVM,RISCV,795,RTS will call the emitTargetAttributes() function using the STI parameter.
LLVM,RISCV,796,RTS.emitDirective( " .text " ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,797,"</s>

 I am unable to make a prediction without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,798,"break ; }

The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another ""case"" statement inside one of the ""switch"" statements."
LLVM,RISCV,799,MO.getType() is evaluated and a "case" statement is selected based on the MachineOperand type.
LLVM,RISCV,800,TargetStreamer & MCT = RTS->getTargetStreamer();
LLVM,RISCV,801,"Since this snippet of code does not contain any further instructions, the most likely prediction would be that there is no next statement and the code execution will end after the second line."
LLVM,RISCV,802,RTS.emitDirectiveOptionPop();
LLVM,RISCV,803,OutStreamer->getTargetStreamer() will be cast to a TargetStreamer object and assigned to the variable RTS.
LLVM,RISCV,804,"<ISA_LIT>TargetStreamer & RTS = static_cast < <ISA_LIT>TargetStreamer & > ( * OutStreamer -> getTargetStreamer ( ) ) ;
Next statement: RTS.emitDirectiveOptionEnd();"
LLVM,RISCV,805,RTS.emitRVFIHWLPBasicBlock(MBB);
LLVM,RISCV,806,RVFI->analyze();
LLVM,RISCV,807,The next statement is: "Initialize the STI variable using TM's getMCSubtargetInfo() function."
LLVM,RISCV,808,No statement is needed.
LLVM,RISCV,809,The code snippet will continue by returning false.
LLVM,RISCV,810,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,811,The next statement is a switch statement to handle different types of MachineOperand.
LLVM,RISCV,812,"This code snippet defines a function named ""lowerOperand"" which takes in a constant reference to a ""MachineOperand"" object called ""MO"" and a reference to a ""MCOperand"" object called ""MCOp"". The function returns the result of calling the function ""lower<ISA_LIT>MachineOperandToMCOperand"" with the parameters ""MO"", ""MCOp"", and the value referenced by ""this"". This function is used to convert a ""MachineOperand"" object to a ""MCOperand"" object."
LLVM,RISCV,813,"}

Possible outputs:

- The emitAttributes() function has been defined, and now a reference to the TargetStreamer class is being created.
- The emitTargetAttributes() function is being called by the RTS reference, passing in a member of the MCSTI class.
- The code snippet is invalid.
- The emitAttributes() function is being called, but it is not clear what values are being passed in."
LLVM,RISCV,814,"}

RTS.emitTargetInstructions(*MCTI);"
LLVM,RISCV,815,RTS.emitAssemblerEnd(M);
LLVM,RISCV,816,The RTS object will be assigned the value of the OutStreamer object's target streamer.
LLVM,RISCV,817,emitFunctionBodyStart();
LLVM,RISCV,818,RTS.setTargetFeatures(STI->getTargetFeatures());
LLVM,RISCV,819,"const TargetInstrInfo !

emitPseudoExpansionLowering(OutStreamer, MI);"
LLVM,RISCV,820,"const MachineInstr & const MI = * InstrInfo ; </s>

The next statement could be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,821,"CInst . setLoc ( Inst . getLoc ( ) ) ; }</s>

CInst.Print(S)"
LLVM,RISCV,822,"// Emit the instruction to the specified MCStreamer.
    S.EmitInstruction(Inst);"
LLVM,RISCV,823,"""return <STR_LIT>"""
LLVM,RISCV,824,"}</s>

There is likely to be a call to the function ""getThe<ISA_LIT>32Target()"" within the ""LLVMInitialize<ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter()"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,825,OS << MO.getGlobal()->getName();
LLVM,RISCV,826,"It is likely that there will be another case statement, followed by a return statement, as this snippet appears to be part of a larger code body that handles different types of machine operands."
LLVM,RISCV,827,We cannot determine the next statement of this code snippet without more information.
LLVM,RISCV,828,<s> virtual void EmitInstruction( const MachineInstr *MI)
LLVM,RISCV,829,The next statement may be something like "run code for the subtarget <ISA_LIT>Subtarget" or "generate instructions for the given subtarget".
LLVM,RISCV,830,if ( FeaturesRequired.contains(ActiveFeatures[<STR_LIT>]) ) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,831,The code will return ABI_ILP32E if the TargetABI is not equal to ABI_Unknown and IsRV32E is true.
LLVM,RISCV,832,The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( IsRV64 ) return ABI_LP64 .
LLVM,RISCV,833,"The next statement would likely be a ""break"" statement, as the code indicates a switch statement and there are no other cases listed."
LLVM,RISCV,834,return SEW * 8 ;
LLVM,RISCV,835,break;
LLVM,RISCV,836,return VLMULBits * VSEWBits;
LLVM,RISCV,837,return combinedEncoding;
LLVM,RISCV,838,return isCheriPureCapABI ( TargetABI ) ? "Target uses the CHERI pure-capability ABI" : "Target does not use the CHERI pure-capability ABI";
LLVM,RISCV,839,return TSFlags & VConstraintBits;
LLVM,RISCV,840,"A return statement will be included in the code snippet, as the code appears to be defining a function and the next logical step would be to return a value from that function."
LLVM,RISCV,841,"The next statement would be a case statement following the previous format, or the default statement at the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,842,"It is likely that the next statement would involve a Boolean comparison or conditional check using the returned value of ""TSFlags & IsRVVWideningReductionMask"" as a condition. For example, it may be used in an ""if"" statement to determine which code path to take."
LLVM,RISCV,843,It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet since it is incomplete and lacks context.
LLVM,RISCV,844,"""isTailAgnostic ( VType ) OS"""
LLVM,RISCV,845,"}</s>

The code will return the value of TSFlags and the UsesMaskPolicyMask and return a bool value."
LLVM,RISCV,846,It is likely that the code will terminate with an error message if the condition is met.
LLVM,RISCV,847,"This code snippet returns a static_cast of a fraction or number, possibly adjusting it with multiplication by the logarithm, either adding or subtracting depending on whether the value is fractional."
LLVM,RISCV,848,"The next statement will print either <STR_LIT> or <STR_LIT>, depending on whether VType is tail agnostic or not."
LLVM,RISCV,849,OS << <STR_LIT>; break;
LLVM,RISCV,850,} else if ( IsRV64E && TargetABI != ABI_LLP64E && TargetABI != ABI_Unknown ) { errs ( ) << <STR_LIT> ; TargetABI = ABI_Unknown ; }
LLVM,RISCV,851,This code snippet is used to encode various VTYPEs for a specific instruction set architecture.
LLVM,RISCV,852,It will return the variable "MergeOpIndex" casted to type "int8_t".
LLVM,RISCV,853,"I am sorry, I am an AI language model and I cannot analyze or predict the outcome of code snippets. My function is to assist users in generating human-like text based on the input I receive."
LLVM,RISCV,854,return static_cast < int8_t > (SEWIndex) ;
LLVM,RISCV,855,It will return an integer of 8 bits from the variable VLIndex.
LLVM,RISCV,856,"""Get the volume of the current location."""
LLVM,RISCV,857,"</s>

The code snippet is assigning a value to the variable VLMUL. The value is calculated by performing a bitwise OR operation on two variables, VType and <NUM_LIT>, and shifting the result of the second variable by <NUM_LIT> bits."
LLVM,RISCV,858,"</s>

unsigned VLMUL = ( VType & <NUM_LIT> ) | ( ( VType & <NUM_LIT> ) >> <NUM_LIT> ) ;

statement: VLMUL will be assigned a value based on the bitwise operations performed with the variables VType and <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,859,"The code snippet returns a static cast of the VSEW variable, possibly to the ISA_LIT type."
LLVM,RISCV,860,unsigned LMUL = ( VType >> 8 ) & 3 ;
LLVM,RISCV,861,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, as the code snippet seems incomplete."
LLVM,RISCV,862,"Offset++;
// Offset will now be equal to <NUM_LIT> + 1."
LLVM,RISCV,863,"if (hasVecPolicyOp(TSFlags)) {
    Offset = <NUM_LIT>; 
} else {
    Offset = <NUM_LIT>; // this line was added to the original code snippet given
}"
LLVM,RISCV,864,The next statement will likely involve a conditional statement or an assertion check related to the SEW and VL operations in the TSFlags.
LLVM,RISCV,865,return Desc.getNumOperands() - Offset;
LLVM,RISCV,866,"}

It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the context and purpose of the code snippet. The code snippet provided only contains one statement."
LLVM,RISCV,867,Cannot predict without knowing the value of TSFlags.
LLVM,RISCV,868,The next statement will likely be to close the statement with a semicolon and end the function code block.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,869,The function will return a register named "SCSPReg".
LLVM,RISCV,870,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement that checks for one of the ABI options listed in the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,871,The next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the values of the variables TailAgnostic and MaskAgnostic and updates the value of VTypeI accordingly. It will use the bitwise OR operator to combine the current value of VTypeI with <NUM_LIT> in both cases.
LLVM,RISCV,872,"</s>


It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context or information about the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,873,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the value of VType and <NUM_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,874,return static_cast < <ISA_LIT>VSEW > ( VSEW ) * 2 ;
LLVM,RISCV,875,"} else {
  errs() << ""Unrecognized ABI '"" << ABIName << ""'. Assuming ABI_Unknown."";
  TargetABI = ABI_Unknown;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,876,"}

The next statement will check if the ABIName ends with a string literal and FeatureBits does not contain another string literal, then print another string literal and set TargetABI to ABI_Unknown."
LLVM,RISCV,877,Most likely the code will return the element 0 of an array or list.
LLVM,RISCV,878,The next statement could be a declaration of a boolean variable named "result" or "output" and an initialization of it to equal the value returned by the function "writesElement0". For example: "bool result = writesElement0();"
LLVM,RISCV,879,return FeatureVector;
LLVM,RISCV,880,"If
:

the statement will be ""FeatureVector.push_back(std::string() + Feature.Key);""."
LLVM,RISCV,881,"""Target ABI is determined to be ABI_Unknown due to a non-empty ABIName and the architecture being 64-bit."""
LLVM,RISCV,882,"if (TailAgnostic) {
	VTypeI |= <NUM_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,883,if TailAgnostic variable is true.
LLVM,RISCV,884,FeatureVector contains a string with the value of Feature.Key appended to it.
LLVM,RISCV,885,"""There are two new cases, LMUL_F2 and LMUL_F8, which involve calculating the value of LMul based on the difference between a constant and the current value of VLMUL. After the switch statement, there is an if-else statement checking if VType is tail agnostic and printing a string accordingly. Another if statement checks if VType is mask agnostic and adds a string to the output accordingly."""
LLVM,RISCV,886,"} </s>

The next statement is likely to be the end of the switch statement followed by a closing curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,887,OS << <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,888,"TargetABI is not equal to ABI_Unknown, so the next statement will be ""return TargetABI"". However, if IsRV32E is true, the next statement will instead be ""return ABI_ILP32E""."
LLVM,RISCV,889,"errs ( ) << <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ; TargetABI = ABI_Unknown ; } 

<STR_LIT> amd64


else if ( ABIName.startswith ( <STR_LIT> ) && ! IsRV64 && IsRV32E ) { errs() << <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> ; TargetABI = ABI_Unknown ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,890,"getVSEW = 1 ; return VSEW + 1

}"
LLVM,RISCV,891,I cannot predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet. Please provide more context.
LLVM,RISCV,892,The function will return the value of the <STR_LIT> variable.
LLVM,RISCV,893,return this.bpRegister;
LLVM,RISCV,894,"It will return the value of TSFlags, after applying the bitwise AND operation with InstFormatMask, and then shifting the result by the amount specified by InstFormatShift."
LLVM,RISCV,895,The next statement will return the result of the bitwise shift operation on the variables TSFlags and InstFormatMask.
LLVM,RISCV,896,"Sorry, I cannot predict the next statement as there is not enough context provided."
LLVM,RISCV,897,Call the function "decodeVSEW" with argument as the value of VSEW.
LLVM,RISCV,898,"---

It is likely that the next statement will be to close the function or code block that this snippet is a part of. For example, it may be followed by a closing curly brace or an ""end"" keyword to signify the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,899,"if (VType == 1) {
    return 4;
}

The code will return the value 4 if the condition is met."
LLVM,RISCV,900,"I'm sorry, there is not enough information provided to accurately predict the next statement. It is possible that there is no next statement, as this could be the last line of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,901,return TSFlags & HasDummyMaskOpMask;
LLVM,RISCV,902,"}

The next statement will most likely be a closing curly bracket to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,903,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information on the code and variables involved.
LLVM,RISCV,904,"is_normalizing 

```
{return TSFlags & 64};
 ```"
LLVM,RISCV,905,"}</s>

The next statement will likely involve the usage of the ""return"" keyword."
LLVM,RISCV,906,"It is not possible to predict the next statement as it depends on the value of TSFlags and HasVLOpMask, which are not provided in the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,907,"If the ActiveFeatures does not have any required features, the code will return true as there are no features to check for."
LLVM,RISCV,908,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the specific code implementation and the context in which this function is called.
LLVM,RISCV,909,"</s>

<s> cout << ""The value is returned."";</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,910,<s> return float ;
LLVM,RISCV,911,It is expected that the next statement will check if the value of SEW is greater than or equal to a certain number and less than or equal to another number.
LLVM,RISCV,912,"}</s>

The next statement could be a return statement that specifies a boolean value based on the conditions listed."
LLVM,RISCV,913,default : llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,914,There will likely be another "case" statement with a return value.
LLVM,RISCV,915,"if (Str.equals(""UP"")) {
  return RoundingMode.UP;
}

Return RoundingMode.DOWN;"
LLVM,RISCV,916,"The next statement would likely check if the string provided in the function parameter matches any of the cases provided, and if not, return the default value."
LLVM,RISCV,917,"</s>

The code will cause a fatal error to be reported if the conditions are met."
LLVM,RISCV,918,"// Validate the triple }

There may be code within the curly braces { } that checks the validity of the triple and feature bitmask."
LLVM,RISCV,919,"The next statement could be: 
MBBStartOffset += <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,920,"The next statement is likely an ""if"" statement with a conditional expression that checks if the BranchSize is an integer with a value equal to a specific numerical value, and if so, it will add a certain numerical value to MBBStartOffset before continuing to the next iteration."
LLVM,RISCV,921,"}</s>

This code creates a new function pass called ""BranchSelectionPass"" for a specific instruction set architecture. It uses the ""create"" function from the LLVM library and returns an instance of ""ISA_LIT""BSel."
LLVM,RISCV,922,"}

The code will return the string literal contained in the function."
LLVM,RISCV,923,"}

""Create an instance of the ISA_LIT BSelPass class and initialize it, using the PassRegistry to get the correct PassRegistry for this pass."""
LLVM,RISCV,924,I cannot predict the next statement without having more information about the code and its purpose.
LLVM,RISCV,925,The next statement is: EverMadeChange |= MadeChange ;
LLVM,RISCV,926,"The next statement is likely to be the end of the code snippet, as the ""if"" statement is followed by a ""return"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,927,"</s>

return MIRBuilder.buildInstr(Info.Opc)"
LLVM,RISCV,928,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet could be a conditional statement or function call that performs the actual lowering of the given call instruction. It could also include variable declarations or assignments related to the call lowering process."
LLVM,RISCV,929,This code snippet will likely call the "CallLowering" function passing in the address of the "TLI" parameter.
LLVM,RISCV,930,"<<TARGET_SET ( __cdecl <<FUNCTION_CODE ( __thiscall <<CLASS_CODE ( TLI ) ) ) return new <<CLASS_CODE ( TLI ) ;

CallLowering is being instantiated with a __cdecl calling convention and will return a new instance of the TLI class."
LLVM,RISCV,931,"register = MI. getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ).getReg();

Register PrevAVL = PrevVSETVLI -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getReg ( ) ; if ( PrevAVL != register ) { PrevVSETVLI = & MI ; continue ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,932,"} <s>

If the condition is not satisfied, the value of PrevVSETVLI will be set to nullptr."
LLVM,RISCV,933,"The code will either jump to the next iteration of the loop (if the conditions in the first if statement are met) or continue to the next statement, which is not given in the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,934,"The next statement will call the getAnalysisUsage function from the MachineFunctionPass class, passing in the AU parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,935,"}

The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,936,"}

""return <ISA_RAND>_CLEANUP_VSETVLI_NAME;"""
LLVM,RISCV,937,"}</s>

""Get the name of the cleanup vsetvli instruction in assembly literal format."""
LLVM,RISCV,938,"""return MachineFunctionProperties().set(MachineFunctionProperties::Property::IsSSA).set(MachineFunctionProperties::Property::IsAlignmentCorrected);"""
LLVM,RISCV,939,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,940,The next statement will be an assertion that the opcode of MI is a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,941,Pass * CleanupVSETVLIPass = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()->getPass(ISA_LIT);
LLVM,RISCV,942,"if the previous VSETVLI instruction is not null and if the current instruction is a call or modifies register, execute the code within the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,943,"if ( ST.getFeatureBits() & RISCV::FeatureStdExtV)
  return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,944,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could continue with another if or else statement, or it could end with a return statement. It is also possible that there are further lines of code following this statement."
LLVM,RISCV,945,"if (IsRV64) {
  return (Length - 1) & ~7;
}

The next statement would be the closing curly brace after the return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,946,"</s>

 There is no more code to execute."
LLVM,RISCV,947,"} else { return Align ( cc64_get_required_alignment ( Size ) ) ; } }

It is likely that the code snippet would return an object of type ""Align"" with the appropriate alignment based on the given size and whether or not the system is RV64."
LLVM,RISCV,948,"</s>

return Align (Size);"
LLVM,RISCV,949,"This code returns the difference between the aligned size and the original size, cast to the TailPaddingAmount type."
LLVM,RISCV,950,ID . SubtractDecimal ( 8 ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,951,"}
""if (I == E) { return -1; }"""
LLVM,RISCV,952,return -1
LLVM,RISCV,953,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context about the code. The statement could be any valid code following the <s> return GV; line.
LLVM,RISCV,954,"}

<STR_LIT> 

This code snippet is likely part of a function for a class. The next statement will most likely be the closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,955,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the code snippet and the context in which it is being used.
LLVM,RISCV,956,"</s>
print the value in the raw output stream, checking if a constant pool value has been defined."
LLVM,RISCV,957,return Modifier;
LLVM,RISCV,958,"<QUOTE>""ConstantPoolValue ""<$/QUOTE>

<ISA_LIT>IntegerConversion :: <QUOTE>""IntegerConversion ""<$/QUOTE>"
LLVM,RISCV,959,"</s> 


This code will create a new instance of the ISA_LIT CoreVHwlpBlocks class and then return it."
LLVM,RISCV,960,"</s>


// Code skipped for brevity"
LLVM,RISCV,961,The next statement will return the constant string "COREV_HWLP_BLOCKS_NAME".
LLVM,RISCV,962,OldSucc1 -> updateTerminator ( OldSucc2
LLVM,RISCV,963,"// Code goes here

}

// End of function definition"
LLVM,RISCV,964,"// Declaring basic hardware blocks initialized

s> This code snippet is simply declaring basic hardware blocks, which will be initialized in the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,965,"It is likely that the code will continue by closing the for loop with a curly brace, followed by a semicolon. This will be followed by another statement or function call, as the code snippet seems to be a part of a larger code block."
LLVM,RISCV,966,"/* 

return MCDisassembler_Fail;"
LLVM,RISCV,967,The next statement would likely add an operand to the instruction using the register created in the previous statement.
LLVM,RISCV,968,Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createReg ( Reg ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,969,It is not possible to predict the next statement with the given information. It would depend on the specific code and its purpose. The statement could be anything from a mathematical operation to a function call or a loop.
LLVM,RISCV,970,return MCDisassembler :: Success;
LLVM,RISCV,971,return ERROR;
LLVM,RISCV,972,Compile error: <STR_LIT> cannot be concatenated with RegNo.
LLVM,RISCV,973,The next statement would be "return Inst;"
LLVM,RISCV,974,// Retrieve the register for the given register number
LLVM,RISCV,975,The next statement would be: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg)).
LLVM,RISCV,976,"Inst.addOperand(Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));
ExtendedRISCInstructions(Inst, Rd2, Address2, Decoder2);"
LLVM,RISCV,977,"""<s> DecodeGPRRegisterClass(Inst, Rs2, Address, Decoder);"""
LLVM,RISCV,978,"It is likely that the code snippet will call a function to decode an immediate operand, pass in the instruction, UImm6 value, address, and decoder, and then ignore the result of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,979,"DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , Rs2 , Address , Decoder ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,980,"</s>

Call the function DecodeGPRRegisterClass with arguments Inst, Rd, Address, Decoder."
LLVM,RISCV,981,assert (Result == MCDisassembler::Success && <STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,982,The next statement will return the DecodeStatus variable "Result" as MCDisassembler::Success.
LLVM,RISCV,983,"Result = decodeSImmOperand < <NUM_LIT> > ( Inst , SImm6 , Address , Decoder ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,984,"This function creates a MCDisassembler object based on the given target and subtarget information, using the provided MCContext."
LLVM,RISCV,985,return Reg;
LLVM,RISCV,986,"} }

The next statement will be: if ( Bytes.size() < <NUM_LIT> ) {"
LLVM,RISCV,987,"}

The next statement will probably be a function call to register a disassembler for a specific target architecture and create an instance using the ""create<ISA_LIT>Disassembler"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,988,"losion.data.offset.Pos(""555"", 0)

""TargetRegistry::RegisterMCDisassembler(getThe<ISA_LIT>64Target(), create<ISA_LIT>Disassembler);"""
LLVM,RISCV,989,"// The next statement will likely be the closing curly brace for the Disassembler constructor:
}"
LLVM,RISCV,990,"</s>

The next statement would be:
    return;"
LLVM,RISCV,991,"This code snippet checks if the opcode of the instruction is equal to a specific value and if so, calls the DecodeGPCRRegisterClass function."
LLVM,RISCV,992,"The next statement is ""else { DecodeGPCRRegisterClass ( Inst , <NUM_LIT> , Address , Decoder ) ; }"""
LLVM,RISCV,993,"//TODO: Implement decoding of FPR16 registers }

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or information. It is likely that the code will include a series of if-else statements or other functions that will handle the decoding process for FPR16 registers. However, the specifics of the implementation cannot be determined without further information."
LLVM,RISCV,994,"}

if (RegNo = 31) {
  return MCDisassembler :: Success;
} else {
  return MCDisassembler :: Fail;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,995,return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,996,The code is successful if an operand is added and the program returns "MCDisassembler :: Success".
LLVM,RISCV,997,</s>The next statement is if ( RegNo >= <NUM_LIT> ) { return MCDisassembler :: Fail ; }
LLVM,RISCV,998,"The next statement could be a return statement, which would depend on the previous condition being true or false. Otherwise, it could be the next line of code, which would add an operand to the instruction and return a success value."
LLVM,RISCV,999,"""} return MCDisassembler::Success;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1000,return DecodeStatus::Fail;
LLVM,RISCV,1001,MCDisassembler :: Fail
LLVM,RISCV,1002,"It is likely that the next statement will be some sort of function call or variable assignment related to decoding a GPCR register class, likely passing in parameters such as the instruction, register number, address, and decoder."
LLVM,RISCV,1003,return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,1004,MCDisassembler :: Success
LLVM,RISCV,1005,"return MCDisassembler :: Success ;



""MCRegister Reg2 = x2 + RegNo ; return MCDisassembler :: Success;"
LLVM,RISCV,1006,if (RegNo >= 32 || (IsRV32E && RegNo >= 32)) return MCDisassembler::Fail;
LLVM,RISCV,1007,return Reg;
LLVM,RISCV,1008,"The next statement would be:
Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Address));"
LLVM,RISCV,1009,RI->getNumRegs();
LLVM,RISCV,1010,return MCDisassembler::Success;
LLVM,RISCV,1011,"</s>

Inst.addOperand(MCOperand :: createReg(Reg));"
LLVM,RISCV,1012,"RegNo is added to a register class that matches <STR_LIT>, and a new operand is created using the resulting register."
LLVM,RISCV,1013,"The next statement would most likely be a return statement, potentially returning a MCDisassembler::Fail value."
LLVM,RISCV,1014,return Reg;
LLVM,RISCV,1015,"Size = <NUM_LIT> ; return Result ; } }
The next statement is ""LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << <STR_LIT>); Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable16, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI); Size = <NUM_LIT>;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1016,Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createImm ( <NUM_LIT + RegNo> ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1017,return MCDisassembler::SuccessWithInfo;
LLVM,RISCV,1018,"Using static DecodeStatus DecodeVGRRegisterClass

""If the RegNo is greater than or equal to NUM_LIT, return MCDisassembler::Fail. Then, create a new register using the string literal and the RegNo, and add it as an operand to the instruction."""
LLVM,RISCV,1019,The next statement is "return MCDisassembler::Success;".
LLVM,RISCV,1020,<s> Inst.encode();
LLVM,RISCV,1021,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will involve the addition of an operand to the instruction, using the createReg() function from the MCOperand class, passing in the declared Register (Reg) as a parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,1022,return MCDisassembler::Success;
LLVM,RISCV,1023,Inst.setOpcode(ADD);
LLVM,RISCV,1024,return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,1025,It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context.
LLVM,RISCV,1026,"Next = Reg + 1</s>

Element in floating point register next to current register"
LLVM,RISCV,1027,Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createImm ( Imm ) ) ; return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,1028,"Expecting the return value from X86DecodeOperand [

This code snippet is part of a function that decodes instructions from the x86 architecture. The next statement will most likely make use of the X86DecodeOperand function to decode an operand for the instruction represented by the given MCInst and its associated register number and address. The return value from the function will likely be assigned to a variable or used in an if statement to determine the success of the decoding process."
LLVM,RISCV,1029,"Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));
return MCDisassembler::Success;"
LLVM,RISCV,1030,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without knowing what the code snippet is intended to do. It is possible that the next statement could call a function or method to decode a signed immediate operand and return it, passing in the instruction, immediate value, address, and decoder as arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,1031,The next statement will be "}" indicating the end of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,1032,The next statement will store Imm into the MCInst object as an unsigned immediate non-zero operand.
LLVM,RISCV,1033,return MCDisassembler::Fail;
LLVM,RISCV,1034,This code snippet returns MCDisassembler::Success.
LLVM,RISCV,1035,"} }
The next statement is:

Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable32Only_32, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI);"
LLVM,RISCV,1036,MCDisassembler::Fail
LLVM,RISCV,1037,"Result = decodeInstruction (DecoderTable16, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI); if (Result != MCDisassembler::Fail) { Size = <NUM_LIT>; return Result; }"
LLVM,RISCV,1038,"return (getNextInstr(Inst, Address) == 0) ? Success : Fail;"
LLVM,RISCV,1039,"The DecodeStatus returned by the function will be the result of passing the MCInst, RegNo, Address, and Decoder parameters to the DecodeGPRRegisterClass function."
LLVM,RISCV,1040,Read the value at the position of RegNo plus the specified literal in the FPR32DecoderTable and assign it to the Register Reg.
LLVM,RISCV,1041,<s> Inst.execute();
LLVM,RISCV,1042,Inst .addOperand( MCOperand::createReg(Reg) );
LLVM,RISCV,1043,"//Next statement:

return Inst;"
LLVM,RISCV,1044,"}</s>

""If the register number is greater than or equal to a certain value, the decoding will fail."""
LLVM,RISCV,1045,if ( RegNo == 0 ) return MCDisassembler :: Success;
LLVM,RISCV,1046,[s] Then return the success of the MCDisassembler.
LLVM,RISCV,1047,The function will return a DecodeStatus object indicating the status of the decoding process.
LLVM,RISCV,1048,The next statement is: return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,1049,"""LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Unknown instruction format encountered"")"""
LLVM,RISCV,1050,"This code snippet checks if the value of RegNo is larger than the size of GPRDecoderTable. If it is, the code will return an MCDisassembler failure. Otherwise, it will set the value of Reg to the element at index RegNo in GPRDecoderTable, add an operand with the value of Reg to the Inst, and return an MCDisassembler success."
LLVM,RISCV,1051,return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
LLVM,RISCV,1052,"The code will check if the instruction's opcode is equal to any of the <STR_LIT> values, and if so, it will call the DecodeGPRRegisterClass function with the specified parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,1053,"</s>

}

The next statement is likely to be a closing curly bracket, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1054,Reg = RA;
LLVM,RISCV,1055,"else if ( RegNo == 0 ) return MCDisassembler ::SoftFail;

else return MCDisassembler :: SoftFail;"
LLVM,RISCV,1056,Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createReg ( Reg ) ) ; MCRegister Reg = <STR_LIT> + RegNo ;
LLVM,RISCV,1057,"Inst.setOpcode(X86::FPR32RegClass);
Decoder->decodeInstruction(Inst, Address, Address, Decoder);"
LLVM,RISCV,1058,"It looks like the code snippet is part of a function, so the next statement would most likely be a closing curly brace (}) to end the if statement and the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1059,"</s>

The next statement will be an ""else"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1060,"<STR_LIT>
return MCDisassembler :: Success ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1061,The code will return "MCDisassembler :: Success".
LLVM,RISCV,1062,"Next, the code will check if the condition RegNo is less than <NUM_LIT> is met, and if so, it will continue with the rest of the code inside the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1063,"""The next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the 'Fail' member variable from the MCDisassembler class."""
LLVM,RISCV,1064,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will be the closing statement of a function or method, as it is preceded by a closing curly bracket. It may also include a return value or additional parameters passed to the function or method."
LLVM,RISCV,1065,It is impossible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,1066,"</s>

It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without any context or knowledge of the code being referenced. More information is needed in order to answer this question."
LLVM,RISCV,1067,"return MCDisassembler :: Success }

return MCDisassembler::Success"
LLVM,RISCV,1068,"}

The next statement would be to return an MCDisassembler::Fail status since the RegNo value is being compared to <NUM_LIT> and being checked for a value that is not within <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1069,return Reg;
LLVM,RISCV,1070,"""return DecodeStatus::Fail;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1071,The next statement would be to assert that the Result is equal to the MCDisassembler::Success and that the instruction has successfully been decoded.
LLVM,RISCV,1072,"<?????????????!<?


Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Rd));"
LLVM,RISCV,1073,MCDisassembler::Success
LLVM,RISCV,1074,This code snippet assigns a uint64_t variable named SImm6 to the result of a bitwise OR operation between the result of a shifted fieldFromInstruction function and the result of another fieldFromInstruction function.
LLVM,RISCV,1075,"return decodeSImmOperand <N> (Inst, Imm + 1, Address, Decoder);"
LLVM,RISCV,1076,"else if ( Imm == <BIT_LIT> ) return MCDisassembler :: Success ;

<s> A different return statement will be executed based on the value of the variable ""Imm""."
LLVM,RISCV,1077,"RegisterOperand decodeOperand ( MCInst & Inst , uint64_t Imm , int64_t Address , const MCDisassembler * Decoder ) { assert ( Imm <= 65535 && <STR_LIT> ) ; return DecodeOperand ( Inst , Address , Decoder ) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,1078,<s> MCInst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SignExtend64<N>(Imm << (NUM_LIT))))
LLVM,RISCV,1079,"MCInst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SignExted64 < N > (Imm << <NUM_LIT>))) ;

There isn't enough context to accurately predict the next statement as it will depend on the specific values and use case for the code. It is possible that the code will continue with more instructions or operations on the MCInst or other variables."
LLVM,RISCV,1080,"return decodeImmOperand < N+1 > ( Inst , Imm , Address , Decoder ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1081,"""Return instruction decoding status as success or failure."""
LLVM,RISCV,1082,"}</s>

The code will return the success status of the MCDisassembler class."
LLVM,RISCV,1083,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Offset));
LLVM,RISCV,1084,MCDisassembler::Success
LLVM,RISCV,1085,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(RegNo));
LLVM,RISCV,1086,"""Return the value of MCDisassembler::Fail"""
LLVM,RISCV,1087,const MCRegisterClass *RC = <ISA_LIT> :: <REG_CLASS>;
LLVM,RISCV,1088,"""Catch any errors and return a failure, otherwise create a new operand with the register and return success."""
LLVM,RISCV,1089,"The statement
DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , <NUM_LIT> , Address , Decoder ); DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , <NUM_LIT> , Address , Decoder );"
LLVM,RISCV,1090,<MCDisassembler *>
LLVM,RISCV,1091,"}


 The function will return a newly created <ISA_LIT>Disassembler object using the target, MCSubtargetInfo, and MCContext passed in as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,1092,Inst.addOperand (MCOperand::createImm (Imm)) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1093,MCDisassembler::Success
LLVM,RISCV,1094,return MCDisassembler::Success;
LLVM,RISCV,1095,MCDisassembler :: Success
LLVM,RISCV,1096,"return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
return MCDisassembler::Success;"
LLVM,RISCV,1097,"if (Decoder == nullptr) {
  return MCDisassembler::Fail;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1098,return MCDisassembler::Success;
LLVM,RISCV,1099,Inst.getOperand(0).getReg();
LLVM,RISCV,1100,"// Decode instruction with FRM format

return DecodeSuccess;"
LLVM,RISCV,1101,The next statement will be an assertion with the condition that Imm is an unsigned integer and <STR_LIT> is true.
LLVM,RISCV,1102,"The statement following this code snippet is likely to involve the use of the unsigned variable Reg, which was initialized to the value of GPRDecoderTable at index RegNo + <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1103,"</s>

The code will assign the value at index RegNo + <NUM_LIT> in the GPRDecoderTable array to the variable Reg."
LLVM,RISCV,1104,"</s>
The code will return the decoded general-purpose register class from the specified instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1105,"...

 ""An MCDisassembler condition will fail."""
LLVM,RISCV,1106,"This is a function that decodes a register class called GPRNoX0X2 and returns a DecodeStatus. It takes in an MCInst object, a register number, an address, and a decoder as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,1107,Inst.execute();
LLVM,RISCV,1108,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));
LLVM,RISCV,1109,"DecodeStatus status = MCDisassembler::Fail;

return status;"
LLVM,RISCV,1110,"It is likely that the next statement will involve adding an operand to the instruction using a constant value. It may involve creating an MCOperand object using the function createImm, and passing in a parameter that is the result of sign extending a variable named 'N' and then passing in another parameter called 'Imm'."
LLVM,RISCV,1111,Inst.execute();
LLVM,RISCV,1112,"return inst.setOpcode( uint64_t Imm);}

No code provided

As expected, this code snippet does not have a next statement since it is incomplete and will not compile."
LLVM,RISCV,1113,The next statement will likely be an "else" statement or another "if" statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1114,create<ISA_LIT>Disassembler() will be called to register a 64-bit MCDisassembler for the ISA_LIT architecture.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,1115,"</s>

<s> Disassembler (STI) </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1116,The next statement is the opening curly brace for the constructor function.
LLVM,RISCV,1117,"return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_CALL_PLT ;

case <STR_LIT> : return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_COPY;"
LLVM,RISCV,1118,"</s>

""The constructor initializes the <ISA_LIT>ELFObjectWriter with the specified OSABI and Is64Bit parameters and calls the parent class's constructor with the appropriate values."""
LLVM,RISCV,1119,"The next statement is most likely a constructor for the ELFObjectWriter class, passing in the OSABI and Is64Bit variables as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,1120,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict the next statement of a code snippet without context or further information."
LLVM,RISCV,1121,"The next statement could potentially be another function or method invocation, or it could be a return statement. It is difficult to accurately predict without knowing the full context of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1122,return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_NONE
LLVM,RISCV,1123,"return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_TPREL_SUB ; }
ELF::R_<ISA_LIT>_NONE"
LLVM,RISCV,1124,"It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough information. The next statement could be any valid code or an error message, depending on the missing components."
LLVM,RISCV,1125,"return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_RELATIVE ;

case <STR_LIT> : undefined"
LLVM,RISCV,1126,return MOTW;
LLVM,RISCV,1127,return ELF::R_X86_64_64;
LLVM,RISCV,1128,The next statement is likely to be a conditional if statement or a block of code.
LLVM,RISCV,1129,"</s>

The code snippet creates an object of the <ISA_LIT>ELFObjectWriter class with the given parameters, including whether the object is 64-bit and the operating system ABI."
LLVM,RISCV,1130,return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_LO12_S ;
LLVM,RISCV,1131,"label <STR_LIT>:

The next statement is likely to be another ""case"" statement with a different <STR_LIT> value, followed by the corresponding return statement for that value."
LLVM,RISCV,1132,"return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_ADD16S ;

The next statement would be case FK_Data_Add_1 : return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_ADD8 ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1133,The code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to predict the next statement without additional information.
LLVM,RISCV,1134,"Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , <STR_LIT> ) ;


elF :: R_<isa_lit>_none"
LLVM,RISCV,1135,The next statement in this code snippet is "return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_NONE ;" which returns the value of the "ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_NONE" constant.
LLVM,RISCV,1136,The next statement is: if ( Expr -> getKind ( ) == MCExpr :: Target && cast < <ISA_LIT>MCExpr > ( Expr ) -> getKind ( ) == <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_32_PCREL ) return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_32_PCREL ; return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_32 ;
LLVM,RISCV,1137,The next statement could be case <STR_LIT> : return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_JALR ;
LLVM,RISCV,1138,"return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_CALL26 ; case <STR_LIT> : return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_CALL16 ;
The next statement will return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_CALL10."
LLVM,RISCV,1139,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> )
LLVM,RISCV,1140,"</s>This code snippet will possibly create a unique <code>{ {ISA_LIT}ELFObjectWriter</code> object with the given parameters, depending on the implementation of the <code>make_unique</code> function and the values of <code>OSABI</code> and <code>Is64Bit</code>. It will then likely return a pointer to this object."
LLVM,RISCV,1141,"case FK_Cti : Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , <STR_LIT> ) ; return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_NONE ; 

return ELF :: R_<ISA_LIT>_TPREL_ADD ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1142,"case AttributeType :: Block : 
Result += getULEB128Size ( item . Tag ) ; 
Result += item . BlockValue . size ( ) + 1 ; 
break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1143,"}


The next statement will be setting the ""RelaxAll"" parameter in the getAssembler() function to the boolean value ""RelaxAll""."
LLVM,RISCV,1144,"""The attribute item has been successfully set with a value of 'Value'."""
LLVM,RISCV,1145,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,1146,"</s>

Next, it is likely that the code will define what action should be taken when the option for no PIC (Position Independent Code) is selected. This may involve setting a flag or passing instructions to the linker."
LLVM,RISCV,1147,"In this function, the instruction to disable relaxation will be emitted."
LLVM,RISCV,1148,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context in which this code snippet is used. The code snippet alone is not enough information to determine the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1149,raise an error
LLVM,RISCV,1150,"</s>


The next statement is likely to begin with a closing curly brace and end with a semicolon to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1151,return;
LLVM,RISCV,1152,The next statement will probably be a curly brace to close the function block.
LLVM,RISCV,1153,"}
The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to complete the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1154,return;
LLVM,RISCV,1155,"The next statement could be a curly brace ""{"", indicating the start of a code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1156,"<s>

<s> assert (!OptionsStack.empty() && ""Cannot push an empty options stack"");"
LLVM,RISCV,1157,Error: Invalid function call. The correct code would be "targetELFStreamer.emitDirectiveOptionRelax();".
LLVM,RISCV,1158,"Sorry, the code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without further context."
LLVM,RISCV,1159,"</s>

This code snippet contains a function definition that begins with the keyword ""void"" and defines a function named ""emitDirectiveOptionRVC"" belonging to the class ""TargetELFStreamer"". This function has no parameters and does not return a value. It is likely that the next statement will include a closing brace to close the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,1160,return;
LLVM,RISCV,1161,"This code snippet will push a new MCFixup object onto a vector of fixups, using the values of both Add and Sub as the operands and static_cast to cast Add to the appropriate MCFixupKind."
LLVM,RISCV,1162,"The DF object will call the getFixups function to push back a new MCFixup object, created with the size of the DF contents, a value A, and an Add fixup kind."
LLVM,RISCV,1163,break ;
LLVM,RISCV,1164,The code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement. The next statement would likely be the closing bracket of the switch statement and the start of a new code block for Contents.clear().
LLVM,RISCV,1165,"Streamer . emitInt32 ( 0 ) ;

 /**<NUM_LIT>*/ 

EEP: Not enough information, but it's likely going to emit some more data/code for the attribute items in the Contents list. It could either emit another ULEB128 integer value or bytes depending on the type of the item."
LLVM,RISCV,1166,"return std :: make_pair ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1167,"return std :: make_pair ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> );


There is no further statement in this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1168,"return MBE -> isRelocatable ( ) ; }</s>

This code snippet creates a new binary expression using symbols that were retrieved from the original expression."
LLVM,RISCV,1169,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1170,<s> uint64_t <ISA_LIT> Offset = 0;
LLVM,RISCV,1171,It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context. The statement could depend on the variables and functions defined in the code snippet. It could also depend on the language and specific syntax being used.
LLVM,RISCV,1172,"</s>

This code snippet creates an instance of the MCELFStreamer class, passing in the MCContext, MCAsmBackend, MCObjectWriter, and MCCodeEmitter objects. 
The next statement is likely to define the constructor for the MCELFStreamer class and possibly include additional parameters or initialization code."
LLVM,RISCV,1173,"</s>

This code snippet creates an instance of the ELFStreamer class, passing in a MCContext object and three unique pointers for the MCAsmBackend, MCObjectWriter, and MCCodeEmitter objects. The constructor then calls the MCELFStreamer constructor, passing in the same objects as arguments. The next statement could involve setting up the member variables of the ELFStreamer class, or executing some other initialization code."
LLVM,RISCV,1174,"</s>

No prediction possible due to the lack of context for the variables and functions used in the snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1175,The code is checking for specific features and setting the appropriate ELF header EFlags based on the ABI.
LLVM,RISCV,1176,ELF   ELF :: EF_<ISA_LIT>_RVC
LLVM,RISCV,1177,"if (EFlags |= ELF :: EF_<ISA_LIT>_LP64) {
  EFlags &= ELF :: EF_<ISA_LIT>_LP64SP64;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1178,"The next statement will likely involve using the CapExpr variable in some way, possibly with the emitValueToAlignment function or the MCDataFragment and MCFixup variables."
LLVM,RISCV,1179,The statement will check if the value of CapSize is equal to either one of two numeric literals depending on if the target triple is for a 64-bit architecture or not.
LLVM,RISCV,1180,"</s>

The function will emit a directive for setting the target ELF streamer to use capability mode."
LLVM,RISCV,1181,"if ( Subtarget -> hasSym32 ( ) && Subtarget->inVerti
Subtarget->inVertically() is called"
LLVM,RISCV,1182,This code snippet does not have enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It appears to be missing some essential code and context.
LLVM,RISCV,1183,"}</s>

The next statement is likely a closing curly bracket (})."
LLVM,RISCV,1184,The next statement will probably be an if statement checking if Features[<STR_LIT>] is true.
LLVM,RISCV,1185,"""Check if the next index in Contents is equal to Attribute, if not, return nullptr."""
LLVM,RISCV,1186,"}

The return statement in line 5 will not be executed if the if statement in line 3 evaluates to true, and instead the function will continue to the next line."
LLVM,RISCV,1187,"}

No prediction can be made without seeing the full code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1188,"The next statement is likely to involve assigning a value to another member variable of ""Item,"" followed by a possible return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1189,"Predicted statement: ""BuildMI (LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), ScratchReg).addReg(DestReg).addReg(IncrReg);"""
LLVM,RISCV,1190,"break ; case AtomicRMWInst :: Or : BuildMI ( LoopMBB , DL , TII -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) , ScratchReg ) . addReg ( DestReg ) . addReg ( IncrReg ) ; break ;

The next statement will be:
case AtomicRMWInst::Xor: BuildMI(LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), ScratchReg).addReg(DestReg).addReg(IncrReg);
break;"
LLVM,RISCV,1191,SuperUser will provide information on the next statement or what is expected of the user in order to complete the loop.
LLVM,RISCV,1192,"The code creates a loop where on each iteration, it loads a value from memory using the atomic load instruction and stores it in a scratch register using the store instruction. It then compares the loaded value with a given value and branches to the 'Done' basic block if the values are equal. If not, it loads a new value from memory using the atomic store-conditonally instruction and repeats the process. This loop continues until the compare value and the loaded value are equal."
LLVM,RISCV,1193,"BuildMI(DoneMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), DoneMBB);"
LLVM,RISCV,1194,The code snippet does not provide enough information to make a prediction. Please provide more context or the complete code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1195,"throw new std ::runtime_error ( ""Unknown RMW width"" ) }</s>

10"
LLVM,RISCV,1196,"/* */

The next statement could be `return <STR_LIT> ;`."
LLVM,RISCV,1197,"return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;

return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1198,"</s>

This code snippet is expected to return one of two string literals based on the value of a boolean variable 'PtrIsCap', for three different cases of an AtomicOrdering enum."
LLVM,RISCV,1199,"return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;

This code snippet seems to be handling different cases for different atomic ordering types. The next statement could be another return statement for a different atomic ordering type, followed by more case statements for the remaining types, or it could be the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1200,"return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> :
<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,1201,"}
The next statement is likely a return statement that corresponds to one of the cases in the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1202,"This code snippet will return a specific memory consistency ordering, based on whether the width of a particular operation is equal to a certain numerical value. If the width is not equal to any of the specified values, the code will become unreachable."
LLVM,RISCV,1203,"if ( Width == <NUM_LIT> ) return getSCForRMW64 ( PtrIsCap , Ordering ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1204,The next statement will be the end of the switch statement (closing bracket).
LLVM,RISCV,1205,"return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; return ART atomic_monotonic ;

The prediction cannot be made as there is a return statement before this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1206,"return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ; case AtomicOrdering :: AcquireRelease : return PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;
""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)"""
LLVM,RISCV,1207,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. The next statement could be another case statement or a return statement. The contents of the <STR_LIT> placeholders are also unknown, which could affect the logic of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1208,"return CLen == <NUM_LIT> ? ( PtrIsCap
? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) : ( PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ; case AtomicOrdering :: SequentiallyConsistent : return CLen == <NUM_LIT> ? ( PtrIsCap ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) : null;

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,1209,"BuildMI (LoopMBB, DL, TII -> get (AddOp), DestReg).addReg(ResultReg).addReg(OperandReg);"
LLVM,RISCV,1210,"In the next statement, the code will perform a switch statement on the ""BinOp"" variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1211,"BuildMI ( LoopMBB , DL , TII -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) . addReg ( ScratchReg ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) . addMBB ( LoopMBB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1212,"It is likely that the code snippet will have another statement that performs some sort of manipulation or operation on the MBB, possibly in a loop."
LLVM,RISCV,1213,register CmpValReg will be added to LoopTailMBB
LLVM,RISCV,1214,"{

llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,1215,"break ; }

It appears that the code snippet is building a loop that performs some type of atomic read-modify-write operation using the values of various variables."
LLVM,RISCV,1216,"}


The iterator MBBI will be incremented to the next element."
LLVM,RISCV,1217,"return expandAtomicCmpXchg ( MBB , MBBI , true , <NUM_LIT> , NextMBBI )

The next statement would be: ""case <STR_LIT> : return expandAtomicLoadAdd ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Or , true , <NUM_LIT> , NextMBBI )"""
LLVM,RISCV,1218,"return expandAtomicCmpXchg ( MBB, MBBI, false, <NUM_LIT>, NextMBBI);

None of the above since there is no ""next statement"" specified. The code snippet only contains a series of return statements within different case statements."
LLVM,RISCV,1219,if ( Width == <NUM_LIT> ) return getLRForSC64 (Ordering);
LLVM,RISCV,1220,"return <STR_LIT> ;

default statement will be ""llvm_unreachable( "" ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1221,"There are no more cases of AtomicOrdering, so the code snippet will likely end."
LLVM,RISCV,1222,"case AtomicOrdering :: SequentiallyConsistent : return <STR_LIT> ;

This code snippet is returning <STR_LIT> for the AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent case."
LLVM,RISCV,1223,<s> return "EntryPointSplittingPass";
LLVM,RISCV,1224,"""if (Ordering == AtomicOrdering::Monotonic) {
      return 7;
  } else if (Ordering == AtomicOrdering::Acquire) {
      return Width;
  } else {
      return 3;
  }"""
LLVM,RISCV,1225,"return <STR_LIT> ; 

This code snippet defines a switch statement that checks for different values of the variable 'Ordering'. The 'default' case contains a call to the 'llvm_unreachable' function, indicating that if none of the other cases match the value of 'Ordering', the program should terminate with an error message. Each of the other cases assign a different string literal to be returned, depending on the value of 'Ordering'. The predicted next statement of this code snippet could either be a closing curly bracket (indicating the end of the switch statement and the start of the next line of code) or"
LLVM,RISCV,1226,"The next statement will likely be a default case, which will handle any AtomicOrdering values that were not specifically listed in the previous cases."
LLVM,RISCV,1227,"return <STR_LIT> ;

case AtomicOrdering :: AcquireRelease : return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1228,This code snippet is performing a series of operations and the next statement would depend on the values of the registers used in the operations. It is not possible to predict the specific statement that would be executed without knowledge of the current values of the registers.
LLVM,RISCV,1229,This code snippet is performing a series of operations on registers and asserting that certain values are not equal. The next statement could be another assertion or a comment explaining the purpose of these operations. It is not possible to accurately predict the exact next statement without additional context or information.
LLVM,RISCV,1230,Error: "addReg" function cannot take a string literal as its argument.
LLVM,RISCV,1231,const <ISA_LIT>RegisterInfo * TRI = TII
LLVM,RISCV,1232,This code creates a function pass that expands the core VHwlp pseudo instruction for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA).
LLVM,RISCV,1233,"The next statement is likely to be a declaration or definition of the ""create<ISA_LIT>ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudoPass"" function within the ""llvm"" namespace, which returns a pointer to a FunctionPass object."
LLVM,RISCV,1234,It is not possible to make a prediction without further context.
LLVM,RISCV,1235,"}

assert (isUInt<<NUM_LIT>>(StartOffset) && <STR_LIT>)"
LLVM,RISCV,1236,LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Running ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo\n");
LLVM,RISCV,1237,return <s> This code snippet likely belongs to the implementation of a function called "ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo". It is also a child class of "MachineFunctionPass" with the identifier "ID".
LLVM,RISCV,1238,The next statement could be a conditional statement checking the value of "Changed" and executing certain code based on its value.
LLVM,RISCV,1239,"case <STR_LIT> : return expandReadSpecialRegisters ( MBB , MBBI , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1240,"The next statement would be:
return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,1241,"} MIB . addReg ( Reg ) ;
MIB.addReg(Reg);"
LLVM,RISCV,1242,"BuildMI(NewMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT_2>), TmpReg).addReg(Symbol).addFrameIndex(<NUM_LIT>).addImm(FlagsHi);"
LLVM,RISCV,1243,"<ISA_LIT>ExpandPseudo :: expandCapStoreGlobalCap ( MachineBasicBlock & MBB , MachineBasicBlock :: iterator MBBI , MachineBasicBlock :: iterator & NextMBBI );"
LLVM,RISCV,1244,"return expandAuipcInstPair (MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI, <STR_LIT>, SecondOpcode, select);"
LLVM,RISCV,1245,MBBI = NextMBBI
LLVM,RISCV,1246,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet would be:

<ISA_LIT>LLT NextWidth = MRI.getType(LLT, Index).changeElementType(EltTy);"
LLVM,RISCV,1247,TRUE
LLVM,RISCV,1248,Error: variable "STI" is undefined.
LLVM,RISCV,1249,"The next statement is
assert ( LMUL == <NUM_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1250,It looks like the next statement will be "MBBI -> eraseFromParent ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1251,"Next, there will be a ""switch"" statement to handle different types of atomic operations (eg. add, sub, and, etc)."
LLVM,RISCV,1252,"""Error. 

""Unsupported binop"";"
LLVM,RISCV,1253,"The next statement will be another case statement, as the code is still within the switch statement, and the default case has not been reached yet."
LLVM,RISCV,1254,LoopTailMBB.insert(MI);
LLVM,RISCV,1255,"The next statement will be:

Add a new case for AtomicRMWInst::UMax and AtomicRMWInst::UMin to handle unsigned operations."
LLVM,RISCV,1256,It seems like the predicted statement would be to add the live physical registers to the NewMBB.
LLVM,RISCV,1257,NewMBB->addSuccessor(&NewMBB);
LLVM,RISCV,1258,"""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1259,"return expandVRESTORE ( MBB , MBBI ) ;


The next statement would be ""default: return expandVMSET_VMCLR(MBB, MBBI, <STR_LIT>);""."
LLVM,RISCV,1260,"The next statement would be:
Desc.expandLoadStoreMultipleOps(Opcode, MBBI->getOperand(0).getReg(), MBBI->getOperand(0).getReg(), MBBI->getOperand(1).getImm());"
LLVM,RISCV,1261,"<s> // This code snippet does not include any control flow statements, so the next statement would likely be some sort of code operation."
LLVM,RISCV,1262,"The next statement is: BuildMI(LoopTailMBB, DL, TII -> get (getSCForRMW(Ordering, Width)), ScratchReg).addReg(AddrReg).addReg(MaskReg)"
LLVM,RISCV,1263,The next statement is likely to involve constructing a new instruction and inserting it into the LoopIfBodyMBB block.
LLVM,RISCV,1264,"return expandVSPILL ( MBB , MBBI ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1265,"The next statement will be to erase the instruction pointed to by MBBI from its parent, followed by returning the value 'true'."
LLVM,RISCV,1266,"The next statement is:
BuildMI( MBB, MBBI, DL, Desc ).addReg( DstReg, RegState::Define | getDeadRegState( DstIsDead ) ).add( MBBI -> getOperand( <NUM_LIT> ) ).add( MBBI -> getOperand( <NUM_LIT> ) ).add( MBBI -> getOperand( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1267,Add the successor machine basic block to the current machine basic block and then erase the current machine instruction from its parent before returning true.
LLVM,RISCV,1268,"BuildMI (NewMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), DestReg).addImm(0).addReg(DestReg).addImm(FlagsHi)"
LLVM,RISCV,1269,The next statement is a closing bracket that ends the "switch" statement and the "expandMI" function.
LLVM,RISCV,1270,"The next statement could be one of two things, depending on the value of the <STR_LIT> variable. It could either be:

return expandAtomicCmpXchg(MBB, MBBI, true, <NUM_LIT>, NextMBBI);

or

return expandLoadLocalAddress(MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI);"
LLVM,RISCV,1271,else assert ( LMUL == <NUM_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1272,MBBI->eraseFromParent ();
LLVM,RISCV,1273,The prediction is that the code will continue to build and add machine instructions using the BuildMI function. The code will then proceed to erase the current instruction pointed to by MBBI and return a value of true.
LLVM,RISCV,1274,"""The method buildMI is called to add a Register for the Destination Register."""
LLVM,RISCV,1275,unsigned MaskedReg = MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg();
LLVM,RISCV,1276,MBB.addSuccessor(DoneMBB);
LLVM,RISCV,1277,"The next statement is: insertMaskedMerge ( TII , DL , LoopTailMBB , ScratchReg , DestReg , NewValReg , MaskReg , ScratchReg ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1278,"BuildMI(LoopHeadMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(DestReg).addReg(NewValReg).addMBB(DoneMBB);"
LLVM,RISCV,1279,"The next statement is likely to be another ""BuildMI"" line, creating a machine instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1280,"This code snippet appears to be a part of a function that modifies some values in a specific register. The next statement could potentially be another BuildMI call that adds another instruction to the ""MBB"" block, likely modifying the values in ""DestReg"" and possibly using ""ScratchReg"" as an intermediary."
LLVM,RISCV,1281,"The next statement will be ""BuildMI ( MBB , DL , TII -> get ( MaskReg ), ScratchReg ) . addReg ( ScratchReg ) . addReg ( OldValReg ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1282,"The code will insert a new sext instruction into the machine basic block, using the provided instruction info, debug location, and register values for the value and shift amount."
LLVM,RISCV,1283,"This code snippet builds a MachineInstr object, then adds two registers to it as operands."
LLVM,RISCV,1284,"}

case <STR_LIT> : return expandLoadAddress (MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI);"
LLVM,RISCV,1285,"The next statement will be: ""BuildMI(LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(ScratchReg).addReg(MaskReg);"""
LLVM,RISCV,1286,"The next statement is:

BuildMI (LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), AddrReg)
.appendReg(AddrReg)
.appendReg(ScratchReg);"
LLVM,RISCV,1287,"case <STR_LIT> : return expandAtomicCmpXchg ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Xor , atomic <= 16 bits , <NUM_LIT> , NextMBBI ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1288,"The next statement would likely be a ""default"" case statement, which would handle unrecognized AtomicRMWInst values."
LLVM,RISCV,1289,"return expandAtomicBinOp ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Star, true , <NUM_LIT> , NextMBBI ) ;


None of the above. This code snippet is missing a ""default"" case, which is typically used to handle any possible values not explicitly defined in the ""switch"" statement. Without a default case, the code will not have a specified action for certain values and may result in errors or unexpected behavior."
LLVM,RISCV,1290,The next statement would be "return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,1291,"}

The next statement will most likely be the closing curly brace, marking the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1292,"return new ExpandPseudoPass();
}

The next statement will create a new instance of the ExpandPseudoPass class."
LLVM,RISCV,1293,NewMBB->getLabel () .
LLVM,RISCV,1294,"The next statement will be:

IF(MF->getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Small) {
    SecondOpcode = <STR_LIT>;
    FlagsHi = <STR_LIT>;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1295,"In this code snippet, it seems like the ""else"" condition is being checked, so the next statement would likely be setting the value of SecondOpcode and FlagsHi to a default value. It is not clear what that value would be without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,1296,"The next statement would likely be a conditional statement that checks if the expandAuipcInstPair function was successful, and if so, returns true."
LLVM,RISCV,1297,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted.
LLVM,RISCV,1298,The next statement could involve defining variables or calling other functions to complete the expandLoadTLSGDAddress function.
LLVM,RISCV,1299,"if (Subtarget.isELF()) {
    expandLoadLocalAddress(MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1300,return Modified;
LLVM,RISCV,1301,The next statement will likely involve using the BuildMI function to add an instruction to the basic block (MBB) using the instruction description (Desc) and specifying two undef registers as operands (DstReg). This is followed by erasing the last instruction from the parent and returning true.
LLVM,RISCV,1302,This code snippet will erase the instruction at the current position (MBBI) from the parent block (MBB) and return true.
LLVM,RISCV,1303,"</s>

The next statement will likely involve performing some operation with the MachineBasicBlock and its iterator MBBI."
LLVM,RISCV,1304,There are two operands being added to the instruction being built.
LLVM,RISCV,1305,"}

""return <ISA_LIT>_EXPAND_PSEUDO_NAME ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1306,The next statement would be the opening curly brace for the "getPassName" function.
LLVM,RISCV,1307,"</ISA_LIT
>

}"
LLVM,RISCV,1308,return Modified;
LLVM,RISCV,1309,"if (<ISA_LIT>FI -> getCallsEhReturn ( ) ) {
    <ISA_LIT>FI -> createEhDataRegsFI ( ) ;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1310,"</s>

return  EHDataReg[I];"
LLVM,RISCV,1311,The next statement is "MF.getRegInfo().setPhysRegUsed(SP);"
LLVM,RISCV,1312,"}

The next statement would be:
BuildMI(MBB, I, dl, TII.get(ADDu), FP).addReg(SP).addReg(ZERO);"
LLVM,RISCV,1313,"BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, dl, TII.get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex).addImm(StackSize);"
LLVM,RISCV,1314,The next statement will likely be a conditional statement to check the return value of the function call and decide the next course of action based on its result.
LLVM,RISCV,1315,return MFI->getMaxCallFrameSize() + getStackAlignment() == 0;
LLVM,RISCV,1316,"I'm sorry, I cannot generate code snippets or make predictions."
LLVM,RISCV,1317,The next statement could be defining the class constructor or a method within the class.
LLVM,RISCV,1318,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,1319,return ;
LLVM,RISCV,1320,"The next statement will be:

Register ScratchReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&VRM::GPR64RegClass);"
LLVM,RISCV,1321,"FactorRegister = TII -> getVLENFactoredAmount ( MF , MBB , MBBI , DL , Amount , Flag )"
LLVM,RISCV,1322,"This code snippet builds a machine instruction, specified by the instruction code stored in Opc, that uses FactorRegister as a VLEN factored amount."
LLVM,RISCV,1323,Align RVVStackAlign (Offset) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1324,The code snippet will return false.
LLVM,RISCV,1325,This code snippet predicts that the next statement will be "SavedRegs.set(Regs[i])".
LLVM,RISCV,1326,"This code snippet checks if the current function has a base pointer (BP) and if so, sets SavedRegs to the string literal """". Then, it gets the MachineFrameInfo from the MachineFunction. The next statement will check if the MachineFunction's function has the function attribute specified by the string literal, and if the MachineFrameInfo has any calls. If both conditions are true, the code will create a static array of MCPhysRegs, with the values listed in the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1327,"""The code sets the stack size to an aligned value based on the stack alignment information retrieved from the target register info."""
LLVM,RISCV,1328,"}

DebugLoc DL = MI -> getDebugLoc ( ) ; if ( ! hasReservedCallFrame ( MF ) ) { int64_t Amount = MI -> getOperand ( 2 ) . getImm ( ) ; if ( Amount != 0 ) { Amount = alignSPAdjust ( Amount ) ; if ( MI -> getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) Amount = - Amount ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,1329,"?></s>


Do a first round of stack alignment adjustments if necessary."
LLVM,RISCV,1330,The assertion statement "assert (SecondSPAdjustAmount > 0 && <STR_LIT>) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1331,"(Error)Missing 'return' </s>

The next statement will check if the register reserved by the user is the FPReg, and if so, it will diagnose an unsupported diagnostic."
LLVM,RISCV,1332,"}

A Register SCSPReg should be initialized next to check whether STI is reserved by the user or not."
LLVM,RISCV,1333,The next statement will be defining a variable using the BuildMI function and setting a MachineInstr flag for FrameSetup.
LLVM,RISCV,1334,continue;
LLVM,RISCV,1335,"if ( RVFI->getLibCallStackSize() ) {
    return <NUM_LIT>;
}
else {
    if (!isInt<<<NUM_LIT>>(StackSize) && (CSI.size() > <NUM_LIT>)) {
        return <NUM_LIT>;
    }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1336,return STI.getCpu();
LLVM,RISCV,1337,"}</s>

assert (FrameReg == getFPReg(STI)) { Offset += StackOffset::getFixed(RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize()); if (FI >= <NUM_LIT>) { Offset -= StackOffset::getFixed(RVFI->getLibCallStackSize()); } if (MFI.getStackID(FI) == TargetStackID::ScalableVector) { assert(!RI->hasStackRealignment(MF) && FrameReg == <STR_LIT>); assert(MFI.getStackSize() == getStackSizeWithRVVPadding(MF) && FrameReg == <STR_LIT>); Offset -="
LLVM,RISCV,1338,"}

The next statement could be a closing curly brace ""}"" to close the function definition, or it could be another switch case or ""default"" case. It is difficult to predict without more context, as the code snippet does not include the full code and there is no clear pattern to determine the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1339,return RestoreLibCalls [ LibCallID ];
LLVM,RISCV,1340,"""return (SpillLibCalls[MF.getPort()]);"""
LLVM,RISCV,1341,The next statement could involve creating a register for the subtarget using the information from the STI variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1342,"<


get the SP register of the given Subtarget."
LLVM,RISCV,1343,There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1344,return getTargetMachine().getDataLayout()->isIllegalVectorType(VT) ? TargetStackID::ScalableVectorFrame : TargetStackID::Default;
LLVM,RISCV,1345,"Since this snippet returns the result of a function call, the next statement is likely to be a variable assignment or some other usage of the returned value."
LLVM,RISCV,1346,The next statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the target machine's TargetRegisterInfo object has stack realignment for the given MachineFunction object.
LLVM,RISCV,1347,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,1348,"Possible return statement:

return RegInfo->hasStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() || MFI.isFrameAddressTaken();"
LLVM,RISCV,1349,"This code snippet returns a boolean value that evaluates whether the machine code has certain properties, such as a disabled frame pointer, stack realignment, or variable-sized objects within the machine frame. It also checks if the machine frame's address is taken."
LLVM,RISCV,1350,return MF.getSubtarget<llvm::SparcTargetLowering> (). getFrameLowering()->hasReservedCallFrame(MF);
LLVM,RISCV,1351,"<x>

There are no more statements in this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1352,"</s>



False"
LLVM,RISCV,1353,The next statement could be an if statement checking the returned value from the hasVInstructions() function to determine further actions.
LLVM,RISCV,1354,"The next statement will most likely be a ""return false"" statement, as it is commonly used to signal that the ""any_of"" function did not find any matching elements."
LLVM,RISCV,1355,"""Exit the loop and return the statement outside of the loop."""
LLVM,RISCV,1356,"case TargetStackID :: RegStack:

return false;
default: return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,1357,Size += Info.getCalleeSavedSize();
LLVM,RISCV,1358,assert(MI != MBB.begin() && "Next statement");
LLVM,RISCV,1359,A register will now be stored to a stack slot.
LLVM,RISCV,1360,unsigned Opc2 = <STR_LIT> ; bool isMul = Val < <NUM_LIT> ; if ( isMul ) {
LLVM,RISCV,1361,unsigned ScratchReg2 = MRI . createVirtualRegister ( & <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1362,It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without more information. The code snippet provided is incomplete and the next statement could vary depending on the input and definitions of the variables and functions used.
LLVM,RISCV,1363,"The next statement is likely to be a closing bracket, as the for loop has ended."
LLVM,RISCV,1364,Set the stack size of MFI to equal the aligned frame size.
LLVM,RISCV,1365,The next statement will likely involve modifying the FrameSize variable using the alignTo function.
LLVM,RISCV,1366,"""Align the SP adjust Amount and check if the MI operation code is a string literal. If it is, change the Amount to its negative value and adjust the stack pointer register in the given MBB, MI, DL, SPReg, and NoFlags."""
LLVM,RISCV,1367,The code will return MBB.eradicate(MI).
LLVM,RISCV,1368,"The code will check if the target machine requires stack realignment or if the function contains variable sized objects. If either is true, it will assert that the function has a frame pointer."
LLVM,RISCV,1369,The next statement is likely going to use the "CSI" vector to find the number of callee-saved registers and allocate them on the stack.
LLVM,RISCV,1370,"The next statement will likely involve iterating through the value of CSI, possibly using a for loop or a range-based for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,1371,This code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. More information is needed in order to determine what the next statement will be.
LLVM,RISCV,1372,"</ISA_LIT>

::Value


The next statement will be ""return TargetStackID::Vector;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1373,"It is likely that there will be another ""case"" statement after the current one, either with another TargetStackID or a different condition."
LLVM,RISCV,1374,"if there is not an integer of size <NUM_LIT> in MFI, perform the following actions"
LLVM,RISCV,1375,"}</s>

This code snippet does not seem to have an indentation problem as it is written correctly."
LLVM,RISCV,1376,<SRC> setSSPStartOffset(0);
LLVM,RISCV,1377,return STI.getFrameLowering();
LLVM,RISCV,1378,"The next statement could be:
FI++;"
LLVM,RISCV,1379,The code will return the updated value of "Offset" after all objects have been allocated.
LLVM,RISCV,1380,The code will proceed to set the stack size in the MachineFrameInfo (MFI) class to be the aligned value of FrameSize using the specified StackAlign.
LLVM,RISCV,1381,"The next statement would likely involve using the ""LastFrameDestroy"" variable, as it was just set in the previous line."
LLVM,RISCV,1382,"if (FirstSPAdjustAmount) {
  adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, FPReg, FirstSPAdjustAmount, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy); 
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1383,"}
Call the function ""adjustStackForRVV"" with parameters ""MF, MBB, MBBI, DL, -RVVStackSize, MachineInstr::FrameSetup""."
LLVM,RISCV,1384,"If the condition of the if statement is true, the next statement will be ""return;"". Otherwise, the program will execute a for loop that calculates the Size variable using the callee saved information from the MFI and adds the size of each object to the variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1385,The snippet predicts that the next statement will be "return;".
LLVM,RISCV,1386,"</s>

<s> %The next statement will return true</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1387,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1388,}
LLVM,RISCV,1389,"</s>

The code snippet will assign the frame information from MF to the variable MFI and the register information from STI to the variable TRI."
LLVM,RISCV,1390,if (I != E) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1391,"if ( ! MF . getSubtarget < <ISA_LIT>Subtarget > ( ) . hasStdExtV ( ) ) {
    return false;
};"
LLVM,RISCV,1392,assert (MI != MBB.begin() && RestoreLibCall);
LLVM,RISCV,1393,assert(!MI->getOperand(0).isReg());
LLVM,RISCV,1394,return Subtarget.suppressFrameGrowth() ? -64 : 0;
LLVM,RISCV,1395,return new <ISA_LIT>FrameLowering(STI);
LLVM,RISCV,1396,"The code will call the BuildMI function to create a new machine instruction which will be added to the MBB block. This instruction will use external symbol SpillLibCall with flags MachineInstr::FrameSetup, and also add any register in CS as a live in for MBB."
LLVM,RISCV,1397,<s> int VRegSize = FrameSize / 2;
LLVM,RISCV,1398,No more code statements
LLVM,RISCV,1399,">

initialize the value of FPOffset """"""

Predicted: """"""
If the condition (RI->needsStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects()) is true, the value of FPOffset will be set to RealStackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize()."
LLVM,RISCV,1400,"The next statement is:

adjustReg (MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);"
LLVM,RISCV,1401,MFI.setMaxCallFrameSize(MaxCallSize);
LLVM,RISCV,1402,"The next statement will check if the register info needs stack realignment or if there are variable-sized objects, and if either of those conditions are true, it will assert that the machine function has a frame pointer."
LLVM,RISCV,1403,"adjustReg (MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, SPReg, FirstSPAdjustAmount, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);"
LLVM,RISCV,1404,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>), VR).addReg(SPReg).addImm(-1 * ShiftAmount);"
LLVM,RISCV,1405,"}

The next statement could be another instruction for adjusting the stack pointer and updating the CFI for the new stack frame size."
LLVM,RISCV,1406,return CSI[StackSize % CSI.size()];
LLVM,RISCV,1407,return MFI
LLVM,RISCV,1408,"</s>

""Offset += MF . getFrameInfo ( ) . getStackSize ( ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1409,"There will be no more code statements, as the snippet ends with a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1410,RS.scavengeRegister(RS.getNextRegister());
LLVM,RISCV,1411,The code will likely check for the use of save and restore library calls and return true if they are not found.
LLVM,RISCV,1412,"The next statement may be something along the lines of: 
```
for (auto& B : MBB) { 
  if (B.getFlag(MachineInstr::FrameDestroy) == CSI) { 
    MFI.addFrameInst(B, STI, MLA);
    break;
  }
}
```"
LLVM,RISCV,1413,"The next statement in the code snippet is:
CodeGenProcInstructions(MBB, MBBI, DL, RVFI, LastFrameDestroy, StackSize, RealStackSize);"
LLVM,RISCV,1414,"unsigned SavedFPReg = <NUM_LIT> ; Register Reg;Type::<NUM_LIT>
adjustReg ( MBB , MBBI , DL , FPReg , SavedFPReg , - FirstSPAdjustAmount , MachineInstr :: FrameSetup ) ; unsigned CFIIndex = MF . addFrameInst ( MCCFIInstruction :: dwarf64Undefined ( nullptr , RI -> getDwarfRegNum ( SavedFPReg , true ) ) ) ; BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , TII -> get ( TargetOpcode :: CFI_INSTRUCTION ) ) . addCFIIndex ( CFIIndex ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1415,The next statement returned would be: return -1;
LLVM,RISCV,1416,">


The next statement is ""case <STR_LIT> : return <NUM_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1417,"}>

FrameReg = RI -> ��

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,1418,"""

if (MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(<STR_LIT>) && MFI.hasCalls()) {"
LLVM,RISCV,1419,"</s>

Check whether the stack ID at the current index ID equals the target stack ID Vector and the current index is not a dead object index."
LLVM,RISCV,1420,Set the value of FPOffset based on the given conditions.
LLVM,RISCV,1421,The next statement could be: Offset += RVFI->getLibCallStackSize();
LLVM,RISCV,1422,"The program will check if the current function index (FI) is within the range of the minimum and maximum callee-saved frame indices (MinCSFI and MaxCSFI). If it is, the frame register will be set to a string literal and the Offset variable will be adjusted accordingly. If not, the program will check for stack realignment needs and set the frame register and adjust the Offset variable accordingly. If neither condition is met, the frame register will be set to the frame register of the machine's register info (RI) and the Offset variable will be adjusted based on whether the machine has a frame pointer or not."
LLVM,RISCV,1423,<s> auto * MF < <ISA_LIT>MachineFunction> = MF . getParent ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1424,"It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet will be a conditional statement, using the information gathered from the getInfo and hasVarSizedObjects functions to check if the machine function requires stack realignment."
LLVM,RISCV,1425,"Next, the code will most likely use the MFI variable to access information about the machine frame in the current function. This could include things like frame size, frame pointer offset, or other relevant details."
LLVM,RISCV,1426,RS->addScavengingFrameIndex(RegScavFI); }
LLVM,RISCV,1427,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement as it depends on the values of the variables and the surrounding code.
LLVM,RISCV,1428,"The next statement is likely to be ""return SavedRegs;"". However, this is just a code snippet and the full code could have different next statements depending on the context and purpose of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1429,It is likely that the next statement would be to return the updated machine basic block (MBB) by erasing the current machine instruction (MI).
LLVM,RISCV,1430,"assert ( FirstSPAdjustAmount % 4 == 0 ) if ( FirstSPAdjustAmount > RealStackSize ) <INVALID>

Adjust the stack pointer based on the first stack pointer adjustment amount for the given machine function."
LLVM,RISCV,1431,"</s>

""Return the frame pointer register if the target ABI is a string literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,1432,"else return <STR_LIT> ; } Next

The next statement will be a closing curly brace, ending the body of the ""getSPReg"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,1433,"The next statement is:
int FrameIdx = Info . getFrameIdx ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1434,"}

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,1435,"The next statement will check if CS.getReg() is a register and if so, retrieve its minimal physical register class using TRI->getMinimalPhysRegClass()."
LLVM,RISCV,1436,"}

The next statement of this code snippet would most likely be:
return -StackAlign;"
LLVM,RISCV,1437,"""(StackAlign > StackSize) ? StackAlign : StackSize"""
LLVM,RISCV,1438,"return FirstSPAdjustAmount

FirstSPAdjustAmount amount will be returned"
LLVM,RISCV,1439,"FrameReg = RI -> getFrameRegister( MF );

if (hasFP(MF)) {
  Offset += RVFI -> getVarArgsSaveSize();
  if (FI >= <NUM_LIT>) {
    Offset -= RVFI -> getLibCallStackSize();
  }
}
else {
  Offset += MFI.getStackSize();
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1440,"assert (hasFP(MF) && <STR_LIT>);
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount) {
  uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - FirstSPAdjustAmount;
  if (SecondSPAdjustAmount) {
    adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, NoRegister, -(int64_t)SecondSPAdjustAmount, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);
  }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1441,"}
unsigned ShiftAmount = countTrailingZeros ( MaxAlignment ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1442,"}
uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - 0; assert(FirstSPAdjustAmount > 0 && ""Cannot adjust stack pointer by negative amount"");"
LLVM,RISCV,1443,"</s>


<s> return ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1444,"</s>


The code snippet will contain a closing curly brace to end the ""emitEpilogue"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,1445,"</s>

<s> </s>//Emit the epilogue"
LLVM,RISCV,1446,"<s>
This function will emit a prologue for the given machine function and basic block."
LLVM,RISCV,1447,"}

I am unable to generate a prediction as the given code snippet is already a complete statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1448,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, TII -> get(TargetOpcode :: CFI_INSTRUCTION)). addCFIIndex (CFIIndex);"
LLVM,RISCV,1449,next statement: MF.getMachineFunction().getFunction().getName()
LLVM,RISCV,1450,MachineFrameInfo & MFI = MF.getFrameInfo(); const TargetRegisterClass * RC = &<STR_LIT>; const MachineRegisterInfo * MRI = MF.getRegisterInfo();
LLVM,RISCV,1451,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , TII -> get ( Opc ) , Reg ) . addReg ( FactorRegister , RegState :: Kill ) .addReg(SPReg).addReg(FactorRegister, RegState:: Kill);"
LLVM,RISCV,1452,The code will create a new machine instruction (MI) and add the newly calculated FactorRegister value as a register operand with the "Kill" register state.
LLVM,RISCV,1453,uint64_t FPOffset = RealStackSize - RVFI -> getVarArgsSaveSize ( ) ; uint64_t RVVStackSize = RVFI -> getRVVStackSize ( ) + FPOffset ;
LLVM,RISCV,1454,"The next statement would be: 
adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, FPReg, FPOffset - FirstSPAdjustAmount, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);"
LLVM,RISCV,1455,"MachineRegisterInfo & MRI = MF . getRegInfo ( ) ; const TargetRegisterClass * RC = RI -> getMinimalPhysRegClass ( SPReg < <NUM_LIT> . . .int64_t

64"
LLVM,RISCV,1456,There are no more statements to execute in this snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1457,RVLScavFI
LLVM,RISCV,1458,"} </s>

The if statement checks if the MachineFunction has a frame pointer and if it does, the SavedRegs BitVector will be set with a specific register."
LLVM,RISCV,1459,"</s>

'CalleeSaveEntry' variable will be initialized with the values returned from 'determineCalleeSaves' function."
LLVM,RISCV,1460,"""The code above is attempting to calculate the stack size and determine if stack realignment is necessary or if there are variable-sized objects, in which case the presence of a frame pointer is expected."""
LLVM,RISCV,1461,Adjust the stack register using the adjustReg function.
LLVM,RISCV,1462,"""Obtain the minimal physical register class of the next register in the list."""
LLVM,RISCV,1463,"""End of code snippet."""
LLVM,RISCV,1464,"TargetFrameLowering :: determineCalleeSaves ( MF , SavedRegs , RS ) ;</s>

SavedRegs.set(<STR_LIT>);
SavedRegs.set(<STR_LIT_2>);

Note: The next statement cannot be determined with certainty as the code only mentions setting two values into the SavedRegs variable and does not provide any information on what those values are. However, it is likely that the next statement will also involve some manipulation of the SavedRegs variable or possibly calling a function that uses the SavedRegs variable as an input argument."
LLVM,RISCV,1465,"}</s>

The next statement of this code snippet would call the function determineCalleeSaves from the parent class TargetFrameLowering."
LLVM,RISCV,1466,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be:

MachineFrameInfo is set to access the current stack size using the getStackSize function from RegisterInfo."
LLVM,RISCV,1467,"uint64_t PrologueSaveSize = <some calculation using FrameSize, StackAlign, and MaxCallFrameSize> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1468,The next statement could be an if statement checking for the existence of a callee saved register by calling a function from the MachineFrameInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,1469,"if (MBBI != MBB.end()) {
  DL = MBBI->getDebugLoc();
} else {
  return;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1470,"This code sets the variables MinCSFI and MaxCSFI to the frame index of the current call site and frame pointer, respectively. It then retrieves the frame register for the given machine function. Finally, it checks if the frame index is within the range of MinCSFI and MaxCSFI and sets the frame register to a string literal and increases the offset if it is."
LLVM,RISCV,1471,"Offset += StackOffset :: get ( MFI . getObjectOffset ( FI ) , RVFI -> getRVVStackSize ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1472,Adjust the register at the last frame destroy instruction to have a new CFA offset equal to the previous stack size minus the RVFIs variable arguments save size.
LLVM,RISCV,1473,"}

BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);"
LLVM,RISCV,1474,The next statement will add a CFI instruction to the current basic block.
LLVM,RISCV,1475,"The code will return MBB.erase(I) to remove the current instruction from the basic block, and move on to the next instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1476,"Integer


Adjust the stack."
LLVM,RISCV,1477,"} }

""unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset(nullptr, -SecondSPAdjustAmount));"""
LLVM,RISCV,1478,"UpdateCPI ( </s>

BL = MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opcodes:: SUB_I_R), SPReg .addReg(SPReg).addImm(ShiftAmount)"
LLVM,RISCV,1479,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL <INDENT> Register SPReg , SPReg , SPReg , - Card
djp9oxOa, 3 && ""Stack realignment adjustment must be a power of two"");"
LLVM,RISCV,1480,assert(!hasFP(MF));
LLVM,RISCV,1481,"}</s>

Build the next CFI instruction to be added to the machine basic block by the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,1482,"assert ( MRI &&"" 

The code will adjust the stack pointer register (SPReg) by subtracting the StackSize from it."
LLVM,RISCV,1483,"The code will check if the machine has variable-sized objects or if the register needs realignment. If either of these conditions are true, the code will assert that the machine has a frame pointer and then adjust the frame pointer's register."
LLVM,RISCV,1484,"Once the vector unit is enabled, the code will build a machine instruction in the current machine basic block, using the target-specific instruction for the specified string literal and adding the specified numerical literal as an immediate operand."
LLVM,RISCV,1485,"if (Subtarget.isRISCV32())
    return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,1486,"The next statement could be a return statement, such as ""return true;"" or ""return false;"". Alternatively, there could be another conditional statement or function call before returning a value."
LLVM,RISCV,1487,"return MFI . hasVarSizedObjects ( ) ; } ""

The code snippet is incomplete, so the next statement cannot be predicted."
LLVM,RISCV,1488,"MFI.allocateStack(slot, size, alignment, alloca)"
LLVM,RISCV,1489,"Predict: Predict the next statement of this code snippet: </s> RegInfo . emitPrologue ( * MBB . getParent ( ) , MBB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1490,"}}

The next statement will be ""MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfa(nullptr, RI->getDwarfRegNum(FPReg, true), <NUM_LIT>))"", followed by ""BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex)"". This will create a new frame instruction at the current position in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1491,It will loop through the callee-saved registers and add them to the SavedRegs set if they are contained in the list of CSRegs or if they are specified by MF or MFI.
LLVM,RISCV,1492,The next statement could be checking the number of saved registers using the savedRegs.set() function.
LLVM,RISCV,1493,Return FrameSize + MaxCallSize;
LLVM,RISCV,1494,"""Saves memory by removing the call frame pseudo instruction from the current basic block."""
LLVM,RISCV,1495,"return adjustReg ( MBB , LastFrameDestroy , DL , SPReg , SPReg , FirstSPAdjustAmount , MachineInstr :: FrameSetup )

Adjust the register SPReg on the basic block MBB by adding FirstSPAdjustAmount and setting the MachineInstr to FrameSetup."
LLVM,RISCV,1496,The next statement is to assert that the machine function has a frame pointer and print a string literal if this assertion fails.
LLVM,RISCV,1497,MF . get
LLVM,RISCV,1498,"If the return value of the function is not equal to RAReg, the code will return."
LLVM,RISCV,1499,return;
LLVM,RISCV,1500,"This snippet predicts the creation of a new stack pointer register, the diagnostics of unsupported instructions if the reserve for the register was not set by the user, usage of save and restore library calls, determining the instruction set and register information, and building of machine instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,1501,"<s>

<NUM_LIT> = <NUM_LIT> - getStackAlign ( ) . value ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1502,FrameReg = <STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,1503,"case <STR_LIT> : return <NUM_LIT> ;

The next statement will be a ""case"" statement, with a ""case <STR_LIT> : return <NUM_LIT> ;"" line."
LLVM,RISCV,1504,"for (const CalleeSavedInfo & Info : CSI ) { if ( ! isLibcall ( Info . Reg ) ) { NonLibcallCSI . push_back ( Info ); } } return NonLibcallCSI ; </s>

// This function takes a std::vector of CalleeSavedInfo objects called CSI as a parameter and returns a SmallVector of CalleeSavedInfo objects called NonLibcallCSI that only contains non-library call callee saved registers from CSI."
LLVM,RISCV,1505,"return NonLibcallCSI ;

The function would return all callee saved registers that have a frame index greater than or equal to <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1506,"The next statement is likely going to use the ""TRI"" variable to access information about a specific target register using a function or method provided by the STI object. For example: ""unsigned int regSize = TRI->getRegSize(reg);"", where ""reg"" is a specific target register."
LLVM,RISCV,1507,"return MFI .hasVariaibleSizedObjects() }


True"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,1115,<\ISA_LIT> bool isAddressValid = true;
LLVM,RISCV,1116,"// Nothing to predict, this is the end of the code snippet"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,1508,"_return <Tel closureIsvalid ()

std::cout << ""Checking if the frame pointer is valid for this function..."" << std::endl;"
LLVM,RISCV,1509,"""return MFI.getNumObjects() > 0"""
LLVM,RISCV,1510,"</s>

return MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::AlwaysInline);"
LLVM,RISCV,1511,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,1512,"""RC is initialized to the string literal and then checked to see if the estimated stack size of the function is an integer greater than the number literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,1513,Assert that MI is not equal to the beginning of MBB (the current instruction is not the first instruction in the basic block).
LLVM,RISCV,1514,"</s>

This code creates a new object of the class FrameLowering, passing in a parameter of type Subtarget and assigning it to the STI object."
LLVM,RISCV,1515,The next statement is: "}" (closing brace).
LLVM,RISCV,1516,"return true ; } else if ( enableShadowCallStack ( TF )) { return false ; }

This code snippet indicates that in the case where there is no debug instruction present, the parameter ""enableShadowCallStack"" is checked for whether or not it is enabled. The next statement may therefore involve some sort of return value or conditional check based on the result of enableShadowCallStack."
LLVM,RISCV,1517,"The code will add a non-libcall CSI to the instruction list, and add a corresponding register to the machine basic block before it's end."
LLVM,RISCV,1518,"The next statement will likely involve an assert statement or a return statement, based on the previous pattern in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1519,"The next statement in this code snippet is:

There are no additional statements in this code snippet. The code has already reached its end."
LLVM,RISCV,1520,"The code snippet will loop through the instructions in the basic block, checking for IntrinsicInst instructions with a specific intrinsic ID and type. Any found instructions will either be added to the Gathers or Scatters vector, depending on the type of instruction. After the loop, the next statement calls the tryCreateStridedLoadStore function on the Gathers and Scatters vectors. Finally, there is a while loop that checks for and deletes any potentially dead PHINodes. The code will then return the value of the Changed variable, indicating whether any changes were made during the execution of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1521,The next statement should be: "if (!L->isLoopInvariant(Step)) return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,1522,The code will try to create a strided load/store and return the result of the change.
LLVM,RISCV,1523,"for ( auto * II : Scatters ) Changed |= tryCreateStridedLoadStore ( II , II -> getType ( ) , II -> getArgOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , II -> getArgOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1524,The next statement could be a return statement that creates an instance of the GatherScatterLoweringPass class.
LLVM,RISCV,1525,AU.addRequired<LegacyDivergenceAnalysis>().
LLVM,RISCV,1526,AU.setOption("EnableLoopVectorizer");
LLVM,RISCV,1527,"The next statement is probably going to be a string reference that represents the name of a pass. It could also be a function call or a variable assignment related to the ""pass name"" in some way. The actual output of the code snippet will depend on the <STR_LIT> placeholder, which could be any string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,1528,"If the element type for RVV is not legal according to the TargetLoweringInfo, the function will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,1529,">


The next statement is: 
ConstantInt * StartC = dyn_cast_or_null<ConstantInt>(StrideVal);"
LLVM,RISCV,1530,"The next statement would likely be:
return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,1531,The next statement could be a return statement that returns a pair of values.
LLVM,RISCV,1532,return if the FunctionPass was successfully executed or not
LLVM,RISCV,1533,"</s>

<s>Do some process for lower the gather scatter.</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1534,"}

Iterate through the instructions in the basic block and add any scatter instructions to the Scatters vector."
LLVM,RISCV,1535,"</s>

If the subtarget does not have variable length instructions, the function will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,1536,The next statement would be "return true;".
LLVM,RISCV,1537,The next statement would be "Call->insertBefore(II)"
LLVM,RISCV,1538,"</s>

if (InstrInfo.MaskRegOp && InstrInfo.MulSel == MulSel && InstrInfo.ScaleMode == ScaleMode && this.N == InstrInfo.N) return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,1539,"Possible options:
- Print ""The assertion is valid.""
- Throw an error: ""Invalid assertion.""
- Continue executing the code following the assert statement.
- Skip the code following the assert statement.
- Return a boolean value indicating the validity of the assertion.
- Call a function to handle the assertion."
LLVM,RISCV,1540,"if (getMemOperand(DefMI, 1)->getSize() > Require.getVTYPE().getSize()) {
  // do something
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1541,Assign MaskRegOp to the value of Log2SEW equals 4.
LLVM,RISCV,1542,The next statement would likely be setting the AVLReg field in the InstrInfo object to the value of <NUM_LIT> or <STR_LIT> depending on the condition.
LLVM,RISCV,1543,"The code will check if the ""CurInfo"" is valid, and if not, will assert and perform additional checks. If ""CurInfo"" is valid, the code will check if a specific condition is met and then insert a ""VSETVLI"" instruction if necessary."
LLVM,RISCV,1544,"}

insertVSETVLI(MBB, MI, NewInfo, CurInfo);"
LLVM,RISCV,1545,"}</s>

The next statement may involve returning ""true"" or executing a different branch of code depending on the conditionals in the second if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1546,"<s>

The next statement is: MachineBasicBlock * UseBB = PHI -> getParent ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1547,The next statement is "VSETVLIInfo DefInfo = getInfoForVSETVLI(*DefMI);".
LLVM,RISCV,1548,The next statement of this code snippet will likely be a conditional statement or a loop.
LLVM,RISCV,1549,">

""return HadVectorOp"""
LLVM,RISCV,1550,"NeedInsertVSETVLI = false ; } <s>
Advise that the assert statement on line 5 is not necessary if CurInfo is valid and that if the conditions are met, to insert a VSETVLI instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1551,if (hasSameMaskOp(InstrInfo) && TailAgnostic == InstrInfo.TailAgnostic && MaskAgnostic == InstrInfo.MaskAgnostic) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,1552,"</s>

The code will return a boolean value of true based on the conditions outlined in the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1553,"</s>

True"
LLVM,RISCV,1554,It is not possible without seeing the rest of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,1555,return (this.SEW == Other.SEW);
LLVM,RISCV,1556,The next statement will be "return false ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1557,if ( isUnknown ( ) || InstrInfo . isUnknown ( ) ) return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,1558,There is not enough information to make a prediction. It is possible that the next statement could be another "case <STR_LIT>" or "default : return false ;" depending on the context of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,1559,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,1560,"}

The next statement is likely a return statement, potentially returning a boolean value depending on the conditions of the if statements."
LLVM,RISCV,1561,"The code will now execute a for loop starting at PHIOp and ending at NumOps, with a step size of <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1562,Check if the machine register defined by the PHI instruction is a virtual register.
LLVM,RISCV,1563,Compute the VSETVLI changes for each basic block in the MachineFunction.
LLVM,RISCV,1564,"SEWLMULRatioOnly ( false ) , PredicateValid ( true ) , VTypeValid ( true )"
LLVM,RISCV,1565,"""This code snippet defines a VSETVLIInfo object with various properties, including AVLImm, TailAgnostic, MaskAgnostic, MaskRegOp, StoreOp, ScalarMovOp, and SEWLMULRatioOnly."""
LLVM,RISCV,1566,if (isBundle(MI)) { PrevVSETVLIMI = MI.getPrevNode(); }
LLVM,RISCV,1567,else return true
LLVM,RISCV,1568,if (SEW == InstrInfo.SEW) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,1569,The next statement would be if (TailAgnostic)
LLVM,RISCV,1570,"UseMO will be checked for any implicit definitions and if found, TailAgnostic will be set to true."
LLVM,RISCV,1571,assert( sizeof(T) == datalayout.getSizeOfByteAddr());
LLVM,RISCV,1572,This snippet is likely part of a function that is checking for various properties of an instruction (possibly related to vectorization or tail/mask behavior). The next statement is most likely another conditional check or a return statement to check for "AVL" (possibly referring to address-value-length) in the InstrInfo data.
LLVM,RISCV,1573,if ( hasOtherSEWMatching () ) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1574,It is likely that the next statement would be another conditional statement or a return statement in order to check for additional criteria. This could potentially be followed by code that handles the case where all previous conditions are not met.
LLVM,RISCV,1575,"""This code snippet defines a VSETVLIInfo object with the specified parameters."""
LLVM,RISCV,1576,throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Unsupported AVLImm.");
LLVM,RISCV,1577,The code snippet will continue with an if-else statement that assigns a value to the InInfo variable based on the predecessors of the MBB block.
LLVM,RISCV,1578,TailAgnostic = true;
LLVM,RISCV,1579,The next statement in this code snippet is: StoreOp = MI.getNumExplicitDefs() == <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,1580,"}

The next statement would likely be an ""else if"" statement that checks if TSFlags is equal to the provided instruction (it may be something like ""if (TSFlags == ADD), in which case the code will check if the instruction is an ADD instruction and set the variable HadVectorOp to true."
LLVM,RISCV,1581,"""UsedVL"" is set to false, and ""UsedVTYPE"" is set to false. A new variable, ""VRegDef"" is defined as the register from MI's operand."
LLVM,RISCV,1582,"}</s>

Perform the push_back operation and continue to the next iteration of the loop."
LLVM,RISCV,1583,"} CurInfo = computeInfoForInstr(MI, TSFlags, MRI); continue;"
LLVM,RISCV,1584,"-There is an if statement checking if the boolean variable ""Found"" is false. If it is, the program will return. 
-A new variable ""OldInfo"" is created and assigned the value of the Exit property in the BlockInfo array at the index of the UnavailablePred block's number. 
-A debug statement is printed to the console, displaying the name of the current MBB, the name of the UnavailablePred block, and the value of AvailableInfo. 
-The Exit property in the BlockInfo array at the index of the UnavailablePred block's number is updated to the value of AvailableInfo. 
-The"
LLVM,RISCV,1585,"if ( MI . getOpcode ( ) == VSETVLI ) { return 'If the predecessor of the current block is found and its successors do not have a fixed result, return.'"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,1586,This code snippet will print an empty line and then print the string literal "STR_LIT" without any spaces or punctuation.
LLVM,RISCV,1587,print (dbgs()) ; dbgs () << <INT_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,1588,"If the conditions in the if statement are not met, the next if statement will check if MI is a call, inline assembly, or modifies a specific register. If that is true, CurInfo will be set to a default value."
LLVM,RISCV,1589,"}

The next statement would likely be a closing bracket to end the function, such as ""}"" or "")""."
LLVM,RISCV,1590,The code will return the SEW variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1591,"}

<RETURN_SEMICOLON>"
LLVM,RISCV,1592,"""}"""
LLVM,RISCV,1593,"}


This code returns a static unsigned integer representing the number of virtual operations in the given MachineInstr object."
LLVM,RISCV,1594,<s> else return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1595,"} else { return (Require.Width <= this->getVTYPE().Width) && !(Require.FastMode && this->isTailAllowed());
 }"
LLVM,RISCV,1596,if (ST.hasVL()) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,1597,"The code will check if the AVLReg is equal to '<STR_LIT>', and if so, it will check the validity and similarity to the previous info. If both conditions are true, it will build a new instruction and add the necessary registers and immediate values."
LLVM,RISCV,1598,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1599,The next statement would likely be an "else" statement or a continuation of the code after the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1600,"In the next statement, the code will assert if the string literal is equal to the register obtained from the given numerical literal."
LLVM,RISCV,1601,"return false ; }</s>

This code snippet is checking if the given MachineInstr is a VLA-preserving instruction and returns false if it is not."
LLVM,RISCV,1602,The next statement will be "return true;" if the if statement evaluates to false and it is in the last line of the method.
LLVM,RISCV,1603,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1604,if (hasAVLCall()) OS << <STR_LIT> << (unsigned)AVLCall;
LLVM,RISCV,1605,"MI . getOperand ( 1 ) . setImm ( Pred ) ; } } }

The next statement is:

for ( MachineBasicBlock & MBB : MF ) { for ( MachineInstr & MI : MBB ) { if ( MI . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> || MI . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) { MI . getOperand ( 1 ) . setImm ( Pred ) ; } } }"
LLVM,RISCV,1606,Set the AVL register to a specified string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,1607,"""There is no change to BBInfo.Change at this point."""
LLVM,RISCV,1608,"""End of code snippet."""
LLVM,RISCV,1609,"An if statement checking if MI is a call, inline assembly, or modifies register."
LLVM,RISCV,1610,"</s>

This code snippet appears to be generating an encoded value type using the VType class and the SEW, TailAgnostic, and MaskAgnostic variables as arguments. It is likely that the next statement will involve assigning this encoded value type to a variable or using it in some other way."
LLVM,RISCV,1611,"</s>

if(VALID < completed >)
return <ISA_LIT>VType :: encodeVTYPE ( VLMul , SEW , TailAgnostic , MaskAgnostic ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1612,"This code snippet sets the AVL (address validation level) value in an object called NewInfo. The AVL value is either retrieved directly from a register (if the opcode is not STR_LIT) or computed from a literal value (if the opcode is STR_LIT). After setting the AVL value, this snippet also sets the VTYPE (type of validation) value in NewInfo and returns the object."
LLVM,RISCV,1613,return this->VTYPE == Other.VTYPE;
LLVM,RISCV,1614,"if (HasAVL) {
  // some code to handle AVL register
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1615,"</s>

The next statement could be:

return Other;"
LLVM,RISCV,1616,"The next statement is likely to be:

return <STR_LIT> ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1617,The next statement would be blank. There are no more statements in this code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1618,"The next statement would be an ""else"" statement, indicating that the conditions in both if statements were not met."
LLVM,RISCV,1619,"The next statement would most likely be a function call to set the value type with parameters for string literal L, unsigned S, boolean values for TA and MA. It may also include an assert statement to validate the function's input."
LLVM,RISCV,1620,The next statement could involve initializing a variable using the AVLImm type and storing a numerical value in it.
LLVM,RISCV,1621,return "VSETVLIInfo initialized with AVLImm value <NUM_LIT>";
LLVM,RISCV,1622,"ExecutableButNotSUS

ExecutableButNotSUS"
LLVM,RISCV,1623,"}
The code adds a new machine instruction to the basic block MBB with the opcode stored as <STR_LIT>. It also adds multiple operands to the instruction, including a register, an immediate value, and the encoding of a type."
LLVM,RISCV,1624,"Register AVLReg = Info.getAVLReg();
if(Info.hasSameVLMAX(PrevInfo)) { BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Kill).addImm(Info.encodeVTYPE()).addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Implicit); } return;"
LLVM,RISCV,1625,The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks if the variable "DefMI" is equal to or less than a specific value.
LLVM,RISCV,1626,//DefMI will be set to the virtual register definition of InReg
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,1627,Return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1628,InstrInfo.setFlat()
LLVM,RISCV,1629,LMul = (LMul * <NUM_LIT>)
LLVM,RISCV,1630,"Without any further context, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement in this code snippet. The code could go in multiple directions depending on what the code is meant to do and what language it is written in. It could be a function declaration, a code block, or an object definition."
LLVM,RISCV,1631,"SentenceModifier

""<s> BlockData ( ) {SentenceModifier} VariableDeclaration"
LLVM,RISCV,1632,"Check if the InInfo is valid, if not then return. If InInfo is valid, merge it with the BBInfo.Change and store the result in TmpStatus. If BBInfo.Exit is not equal to TmpStatus then assign TmpStatus to BBInfo.Exit."
LLVM,RISCV,1633,The next statement would likely be another if statement to check if VLOp is an immediate value.
LLVM,RISCV,1634,"}
if (HadVectorOp) {
    HadVectorOp = false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1635,"In this code snippet, the next statement will check if the current machine instruction is a call, inline assembly, or modifies a register, and if so, update the BBInfo.Change variable to be empty."
LLVM,RISCV,1636,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,1637,"The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1638,The next statement would be: "return nullptr;"
LLVM,RISCV,1639,"---</sGuessing that the next line will describe instructions.</s>

I cannot generate a statement as I am a language model AI and do not have access to the variables used in the code snippet to make a meaningful prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,1640,"assert ( BlockInfo [ MBB . getNumber ( ) ] . Pred . isValid ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; if ( needVSETVLI ( NewInfo , BlockInfo [ MBB . getNumber ( ) ] . Pred ) && needVSETVLIPHI ( NewInfo , MBB ) ) {
insertVSETVLI ( MBB , MI , NewInfo , BlockInfo [ MBB . getNumber ( ) ] . Pred ) ;
CurInfo = NewInfo ;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1641,">

computeInfoForInstr ( MI , TSFlags , MRI )"
LLVM,RISCV,1642,"It is likely that the code will return the value of AVLImm if the assertion statement is true, indicating that the variable hasAVLImm exists."
LLVM,RISCV,1643,"}

The next statement will return the value of the AVLImm variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1644,"The next statement would be a closing curly brace, as this snippet appears to be the end of a function."
LLVM,RISCV,1645,assert ( NewInfo . getAVLReg ( ) == AVLReg ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1646,"The next statement would probably be the closing curly brace, ending the if/else statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1647,"}</s>

The next statement will return the name of the current pass as the <ISA_LIT>_INSERT_VSETVLI_NAME constant."
LLVM,RISCV,1648,"It is likely that the next statement is a return statement that includes the current ISA_LIT variable, followed by ""_INSERT_VSETVLI_NAME""."
LLVM,RISCV,1649,The function will return an unsigned integer representing the SEWLMUL ratio.
LLVM,RISCV,1650,"The next statement will be:
assert ( isValid ( ) && ! isUnknown ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1651,return Info with the unknown value set
LLVM,RISCV,1652,"}



It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context."
LLVM,RISCV,1653,"}</s>

There is not enough information to predict the next statement as this code snippet is already complete."
LLVM,RISCV,1654,"</s>

false"
LLVM,RISCV,1655,"The next statement is likely to be another if statement or a return statement, depending on the conditions listed."
LLVM,RISCV,1656,"</s>

This code snippet is likely part of an equality comparison method or function, where the two objects being compared have both AVLReg and AVLImm properties. The next statement is most likely another return statement or a closing brace, signifying the end of the function or method."
LLVM,RISCV,1657,return (VLMAX == Other.getVLMAX());
LLVM,RISCV,1658,The next statement will check if the result of the SEWLMULRatio functions for the current object and the Other object are equal and return a boolean value.
LLVM,RISCV,1659,"addOne(3)

<STR_LIT> ) ; assert ( ! SFUNCT && ! Other . SFUNCT && <STR_LIT> ) ; assert ( ! VLMAXOnly && ! Other . VLMAXOnly && <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1660,<e> There needs to be more information provided in order to make a prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,1661,"An IF statement checks if AVLReg is equal to a specific value, and if so, it executes another IF statement that checks if PrevInfo is valid, not unknown, and has the same maximum velocity as Info. If all conditions are met, it will then build a machine instruction using the 'BuildMI' function and then return."
LLVM,RISCV,1662,"if (Other.getVlen() > this->getVlen()) {
    return Other;
}
return *this;"
LLVM,RISCV,1663,if (TailAgnostic != InstrInfo.TailAgnostic || MaskAgnostic != InstrInfo.MaskAgnostic) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1664,return false
LLVM,RISCV,1665,"This code snippet does not provide enough information to predict the next statement. There could be many possibilities depending on what comes after the closing bracket, such as another function declaration or an if statement using the isUnknown function."
LLVM,RISCV,1666,"</s>
</s>
The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace that ends the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,1667,"return true; 
 }

This code snippet is defining a function named ""isValid"" that takes no parameters and returns a boolean value of ""true""."
LLVM,RISCV,1668,"The program will check if the function isCompatible returns true when called with parameters ""Other"" and ""true"". If true, the program will return the current value of the function. If false, the program will exit the if statement and return the value of ""Other""."
LLVM,RISCV,1669,"If both the current VSETVLIInfo instance and the Other instance are not compatible, the Other instance will be returned."
LLVM,RISCV,1670,"The next statement would likely be an `else` statement, indicating that none of the previous conditions were met and the function should continue with its calculations."
LLVM,RISCV,1671,The next statement will check if the variable DefInfo has the same AVL and VTYPE as the current information and will return false if it does.
LLVM,RISCV,1672,"if ( ! PBB || PBB -> empty ( ) ) return true ;

It is not possible to predict the next statement without any further context."
LLVM,RISCV,1673,"""Execute the InsertVSETVLIPass pass on the PassRegistry instance."""
LLVM,RISCV,1674,"}
""The code will initialize and register a new instance of the ISA_LIT InsertVSETVLIPass class."""
LLVM,RISCV,1675,"assert(BlockInfo.empty() && <STR_LIT>);
updateBlockInfo(MBB);
if (MBB.size() > 0) {
    updateBlockInfo(MBB);
  } else {
    updateBlockInfo(MBB);
  }"
LLVM,RISCV,1676,"}</s>

This function sets the value of the AVLImm variable to the provided unsigned integer Imm."
LLVM,RISCV,1677,The next statement could be AVLReg.join(Reg) to merge AVLReg and Reg into one AVLReg object.
LLVM,RISCV,1678,"""Set the next register value to AVLReg."""
LLVM,RISCV,1679,"}</s>

This code snippet sets the value of the variable ""State"" to ""Unknown."""
LLVM,RISCV,1680,"}

The next statement will likely set the variable ""VLMul"" equal to the parameter ""L""."
LLVM,RISCV,1681,Error: missing semicolon at the end of the statement
LLVM,RISCV,1682,"//No prediction can be made. The next statement depends on the context and purpose of this code snippet, as well as any other code that follows it."
LLVM,RISCV,1683,It is not possible to predict the next statement without context on the specific code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1684,O << " = " << Register[Base] ;
LLVM,RISCV,1685,"</ISA_LIT>



} else if (MI->getOperand(OpNum).getImm() < 0) {"
LLVM,RISCV,1686,"</s>

The next statement could be a conditional statement that checks if the OpNum is valid or not."
LLVM,RISCV,1687,"}

The code will print the operand at index opNum using the function printOperand."
LLVM,RISCV,1688,"}

The code will print a string literal to the output stream."
LLVM,RISCV,1689,"}

// End of function"
LLVM,RISCV,1690,The next statement is an assignment statement where the variable "Imm" is assigned to the return value of the getImm() method with the operand "OpNum" as its parameter.
LLVM,RISCV,1691,if ( Offset < <NUM_LIT> ) OS << '-' ;
LLVM,RISCV,1692,"</s>

The next statement will declare a ""printInstruction"" function that takes in parameters ""MI"" (pointer to a MCInst object), ""O"" (reference to a raw_ostream object), ""Annot"" (a StringRef object) and ""STI"" (reference to a MCSubtargetInfo object)."
LLVM,RISCV,1693,return;
LLVM,RISCV,1694,"}</s>

""Print the operand of the MCInst at index opNum to the output stream OS, followed by a string literal. Then, print the register name of the operand at index opNum + NUM_LIT to the output stream OS, followed by another string literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,1695,"""OS << getRegisterName ( MI -> getOperand( opNum + 1 ) . getReg ( ) ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1696,This code snippet prints the operand of the MI variable at the specified index (OpNum) and assigns it to the O variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1697,This snippet will print the operand that was retrieved from the specified operation number.
LLVM,RISCV,1698,// The next statement should be a closing curly brace to end the printRegName function.
LLVM,RISCV,1699,"} else {
    errs () << "" Operand is not an immediate value "" ;
}

// The next statement will likely either close the if statement or begin the else statement. It may also print out an error message if the operand is not an immediate value."
LLVM,RISCV,1700,O "The
LLVM,RISCV,1701,"The next statement of the code snippet is an if statement, in which the condition is checking if the specified operand is an immediate value."
LLVM,RISCV,1702,The code will print the value of the operand at the specified index.
LLVM,RISCV,1703,"The next statement is an if/else statement that checks if the value returned by MI->getOperand(OpNum).getImm() is an integer and meets certain criteria specified in <STR_LIT>. If so, it will be printed by O << Value, otherwise the operand will be printed by calling the printOperand() function."
LLVM,RISCV,1704,"I'm sorry, there is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It would depend on what operation is being performed and what the value of the operand is. It could be anything from a mathematical operation to a conditional statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1705,"</s>

print the assertion to a string, followed by the value"
LLVM,RISCV,1706,"}

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The code snippet could potentially contain an if statement with multiple possible conditions and branching paths, or it could be followed by another block of code entirely."
LLVM,RISCV,1707,The next statement will output the value of the variable 'Value' to the console. It may also include any characters or formatting specified in the 'O' object.
LLVM,RISCV,1708,"}</s>

We cannot make a prediction on the next statement as there is not enough context to accurately determine what the code is trying to do. However, based on the current code snippet, the next statement could possibly involve using the value assigned to the integer variable ""Value"" in some way."
LLVM,RISCV,1709,"</s>

The code will print the name of the register stored in the MO object."
LLVM,RISCV,1710,"""O << MO.getReg() ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1711,"}

The code checks if the value of FenceArg AND <STR_LIT> is equal to <NUM_LIT> and if not, it prints a specific character based on the condition."
LLVM,RISCV,1712,This code snippet prints the letter 'i' if the value of FenceArg is not equal to the value of <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,1713,"}

The next statement is an 'if' statement that checks if the MCOperand 'MO' is a memory reference. If it is, the function 'printMemOperand' is called, passing in the MCOperand and the operand number. Else, the function 'printUndefOperand' is called, passing in the MCOperand and the operand number."
LLVM,RISCV,1714,"""There is a match between MO and the Immediate condition, confirmed by the STR_LIT variable."""
LLVM,RISCV,1715,the value of MO's immediate operand plus an integer literal
LLVM,RISCV,1716,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables used in the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1717,if ( Res ) NewMI = const_cast < MCInst * > ( & UncompressedMI ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1718,"This code snippet uses bitwise operators to manipulate data and print certain values to the console. The next statement will likely continue the manipulation or printing of data, possibly using the variables ""TailAgnostic"", ""MaskedoffAgnostic"", or ""Imm""."
LLVM,RISCV,1719,"</s>

""unsigned Imm = MI->getOperand(OpNo).getImm();"""
LLVM,RISCV,1720,"The code snippet will check if the operand retrieved from the MI variable is a special capability register and if so, it will output the name of the register to the O variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1721,"return false ; }

""There is no further statement as the code snippet is complete."""
LLVM,RISCV,1722,"The statement could potentially include an error message or code to handle the assertion failure, as it is unclear what action will be taken after asserting the condition."
LLVM,RISCV,1723,The next statement would be "if ( ( FenceArg & <STR_LIT> ) != <NUM_LIT> ) O << 'o' ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1724,"The next statement will be ""printAnnotation ( O , Annot ) ;"" which will print any annotations for the instruction on the output stream."
LLVM,RISCV,1725,"</s>


The statement might be: UncompressedMI = *NewMI."
LLVM,RISCV,1726,"}

The program will check if the MO operand is a register and if so, it will print the register name and return."
LLVM,RISCV,1727,"if ( PrintHex <VTypeI > ) O << "" 0x"" << hex << Imm << ""("" <ISA_LIT> ) }

; returns no output

In this code snippet, the next statement will likely be an ""else"" statement following the ""if"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1728,"Given the previous statement, the next statement would be ""O << ISA_LIT;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1729,"if (NewMI == nullptr)
    NewMI = const_cast < MCInst * > (MI);"
LLVM,RISCV,1730,"printRegName ( O , MO . getReg ( ) ) ; }

The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to indicate the end of the if statement and case statements. It may also be followed by another if statement or another section of code."
LLVM,RISCV,1731,"This code snippet defines a printVectorRegister function that takes in a MCInst variable, an unsigned integer OpNo, an MCSubtargetInfo variable, and a raw_ostream variable as parameters. It then retrieves the register value from the OpNo operand of the MI variable and passes it to the printRegName function to print the corresponding register name to the output stream O."
LLVM,RISCV,1732,Print any potential errors from the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1733,Ediv = <NUM_LIT> << Ediv ;
LLVM,RISCV,1734,"}
The function will print the value of the operand FRMArg to the raw output stream O."
LLVM,RISCV,1735,"</s>

printInstruction(MI, O);"
LLVM,RISCV,1736,The next statement could be "O << <STR_LIT> ;" as it appears after an if-else statement and is repeated multiple times.
LLVM,RISCV,1737,"</s>

Else if ( MC .isFPImm ( ) ) O << MC .getFPImm ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1738,The next statement could be an else statement or a closing curly brace.
LLVM,RISCV,1739,The next statement will likely print the value of the integer variable "Value" to the console or output stream using the "<<" operator.
LLVM,RISCV,1740,The code will check if the value stored in the variable "Value" is a unsigned integer and assert that it is true.
LLVM,RISCV,1741,"if (Value >= 0) {
  O << "", Uimm32 = #"" << (uint32_t)Value;
} else {
  O << "", "" << (int64_t)Value;
}













The next statement prints the value of Value to the raw_ostream O with a conditional check to determine if the value is positive or negative."
LLVM,RISCV,1742,The next statement could be a line of code that prints out the value of "Value" to the screen or a variable declaration for another variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1743,if (ValueMIterEqual
LLVM,RISCV,1744,"}
if (MI->getOperand(OpNum).isImm()) {
    int64_t Value = MI->getOperand(OpNum).getImm();
    if (Value > 0) {
        O << ""0x"" << Twine::utohexstr(Value);
    }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1745,O << "Value";
LLVM,RISCV,1746,O << 'u' ;
LLVM,RISCV,1747,"</s>

There is no next statement. The code snippet ends with the second 'if' statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1748,"If Res is true, MI will now be set to the uncompressed version stored in UncompressedMI."
LLVM,RISCV,1749,null;
LLVM,RISCV,1750,"The next statement is 

return ArchRegNames;"
LLVM,RISCV,1751,"</s>

Based on the pattern of the code, the next statement is expected to end with a semicolon (;) and possibly include another function or variable. It is difficult to determine the exact statement without more context, but one possibility could be something like:

<s> writeRegisterValue(getRegisterName(RegNo, ArchRegNames ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>), regValue); </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1752,"} </s>

The next statement would depend on the value of PrintBranchImmAsAddress. If it is true, the next statement would be: 

Target &= <NUM_LIT> ; O << formatHex ( Target ) ; 

Otherwise, the next statement would be: 

O << MO . getImm ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1753,"""SysReg stores the value of Imm as a string literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,1754,Same as the above because there are no control flow statements or loops to change the behavior. The statement will still be printing out the value of SysReg's Name.
LLVM,RISCV,1755,O << 'w' ;
LLVM,RISCV,1756,"""If the assertion is false, the statements after it will be executed, and an 'i' character will be added to the output stream."""
LLVM,RISCV,1757,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the code that precedes this snippet. The next statement could be any valid code statement following a static cast operation.
LLVM,RISCV,1758,if (Res == 0) // uncompressInst was successful
LLVM,RISCV,1759,The next statement will check if the variable Res is true or false.
LLVM,RISCV,1760,"printImmValue(O, MO.getImm());"
LLVM,RISCV,1761,"}

""Print the zero-offset memory operation instruction with a register operand."""
LLVM,RISCV,1762,"Doubt

It is likely that the code snippet ends with an opening curly brace to signify the beginning of a new code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1763,The next statement would be a curly brace to close the function.
LLVM,RISCV,1764,"The next statement would likely involve using the MachineMemOperand MMO, possibly in an instruction for loading or storing data."
LLVM,RISCV,1765,"It is likely that the next statement will be to add a machine memory operand, as indicated by the variable ""MMO"" being used in the call to ""addMemOperand""."
LLVM,RISCV,1766,"""""

0  
return MIB . addImm ( Offset ) . addFrameIndex ( FI ) . addMemOperand ( MMO ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1767,"}



The next statement would be to end the ""else"" block with a curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,1768,A new statement that handles the case where the condition (isInt <NUM_LIT>(Amount)) is false will be added. This statement could potentially handle the error or exception caused by the false condition.
LLVM,RISCV,1769,">

if(I!=MBB.end()) :

TBB = ThisTarget -> getMBB();
continue;"
LLVM,RISCV,1770,"}


There is not enough information to predict the next statement. It could either be another ""else if"" statement or an ""else"" statement, depending on the conditions."
LLVM,RISCV,1771,"case <TRIPLE_LIT>LXZX: return expandLXZX( MI ); case <TRIPLE_LIT>LCX:

}

// If the current MI instruction's opcode is not either of the above cases, the function returns false."
LLVM,RISCV,1772,"The next statement would likely begin with a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1773,STI.getABIName();
LLVM,RISCV,1774,"""Return either <NUM_LIT> or <NUM_LIT> depending on whether STI is a 64-bit or 32-bit instruction."""
LLVM,RISCV,1775,return Opcode ;
LLVM,RISCV,1776,"</ISA_LIT> </s>

Based on the repetitive pattern of the code, the next statement would most likely be another if statement checking for integer values of Offset and Offset2."
LLVM,RISCV,1777,"The next statement will be ""BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) . addMBB ( FBB ) ;"", followed by ""count ++ ;"" and finally ""return count;""."
LLVM,RISCV,1778,The next statement of this code snippet would likely be a new case or a closing bracket to end the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1779,"BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(<STR_LIT>)).addMBB(FBB).addImm(1).addReg(Cond[<NUM_LIT>].getReg()).addReg(Cond[<NUM_LIT>].getReg()); break;"
LLVM,RISCV,1780,"The next statement would likely be a conditional statement, such as an ""if"" statement, to check for a specific case or condition."
LLVM,RISCV,1781,"It is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a return statement, as the function isLoadFromStackSlot is likely to have a boolean return value indicating whether the given machine instruction contains a load instruction from a specific stack slot. The return statement may also include a reference to the FrameIndex variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1782,The next statement could potentially be a closing } bracket to close the isLoadFromStackSlot function.
LLVM,RISCV,1783,"The code will check if the TSFlags value contained in MCID has the Flag flag set, and if the <NUM_LIT>th operand of MI is a frame index and its associated register and immediate values match the specified values. If all conditions are met, the code will assign the index value of the frame index operand to the FrameIndex variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1784,"</s>

True"
LLVM,RISCV,1785,"}

The code is defining a function called loadImmediate, which takes the parameters MBB, MBBI, Reg, and Value, and is of type void."
LLVM,RISCV,1786,"return (LoadOpcode, StoreOpcode)"
LLVM,RISCV,1787,"""The instruction will be removed from its parent."""
LLVM,RISCV,1788,continue;
LLVM,RISCV,1789,The next statement is likely going to be a function or method declaration for the ISA_LIT "InstrInfo" with an argument of "sti".
LLVM,RISCV,1790,"This snippet will declare an object named ""InstrInfo"" with parameters of type ""Subtarget"" and ""sti"", and initialize it with values from the ""GenInstrInfo"", ""RI"", and ""STI"" objects."
LLVM,RISCV,1791,"*/

getLoadStoreOpcodes ( RC , LoadOpcode , StoreOpcode ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1792,"}

 Through this code snippet the function is comparing various parameters and values to determine the block, TBB, where the control flow will branch to next."
LLVM,RISCV,1793,"int HighWidth = ( HighOffset == OffsetB ) ? WidthB : WidthA ; return LowWidth + HighWidth ;

""return LowWidth + HighWidth;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1794,"return LowOffset + WidthA >= HighOffset ; }


It returns true if the lowest offset plus the width of the first memory instruction is greater than or equal to the highest offset of the second memory instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1795,"</s>

MBB . addLiveOut ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1796,"The next statement could be another case in the switch statement, as the switch statement contains multiple cases and a default case. It could also be a call to the cloneIfNew function, as that is the next statement in the code snippet after the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1797,The next statement could potentially be the declaration of a variable or a function.
LLVM,RISCV,1798,"This code snippet is building a new machine instruction with the opcode ""NewOpc"" and adding operands to it. It then checks if there is a live variable, and if so, it replaces the kill instruction with the newly built instruction. The next statement is likely going to return the updated machine instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1799,"Opc = <STR_LIT> ; SubRegIdx = <STR_LIT> ; NF = <NUM_LIT> ; LMul = <NUM_LIT> ; }
llvm_unreachable( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1800,It is not possible to predict the exact next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and lacks context.
LLVM,RISCV,1801,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the values of DstReg, SrcReg, <NUM_LIT>, and NumRegs."
LLVM,RISCV,1802,<e>return NumOp;
LLVM,RISCV,1803,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. The next statement could be anything since the code snippet does not give any indication of what it is trying to achieve.
LLVM,RISCV,1804,"The next statement will likely be a ""case"" statement resembling the previous ones, with the exception of the first one that contains ""return <NUM_LIT>"". This case statement will also have a series of <STR_LIT> cases, followed by a block of code within curly braces."
LLVM,RISCV,1805,The next statement of this code snippet is: "BaseReg = & LdSt.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,1806,"</ISA_LIT>

The next statement will check if the MachineInstr LdSt is capable of loading or storing data."
LLVM,RISCV,1807,"Based on the pattern of the previous statements, the next statement will likely continue to use the MCInstBuilder function to add registers and an immediate value to the code instruction being built. It could be something like "".addImm(<NUM_LIT>).addReg(<STR_LIT>)"" or "".addReg(<STR_LIT>).addImm(<STR_LIT>)""."
LLVM,RISCV,1808,return MCInstBuilder (<STR_LIT>).addReg (<STR_LIT>).addReg (<STR_LIT>).addImm (<NUM_LIT>).addReg (<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,1809,default: return "Invalid input";
LLVM,RISCV,1810,"The next statement of this code snippet is:

outliner::Candidate &C = RepeatedSequenceLocs;"
LLVM,RISCV,1811,"</s>

There is no way to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or information about the code snippet. It would depend on the purpose and structure of the overall code."
LLVM,RISCV,1812,"<D


{&II::MO_FLAG_MASK, ""MO_FLAG_MASK""},"
LLVM,RISCV,1813,"</s>

std::cout << ""Target flags initialized."" << std::endl;"
LLVM,RISCV,1814,The next statement in this code snippet is a return statement that returns the variable "VL".
LLVM,RISCV,1815,The next statement would be "return VL;".
LLVM,RISCV,1816,"The code snippet will check if the value of ""FBB"" is not null and, if so, it will return the value of <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1817,The next statement of this code snippet is "RS -> enterBasicBlockEnd ( MBB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1818,The next statement will be: return <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,1819,"The next statement of this code snippet will likely be another ""case"" statement, followed by a conditional expression using the MI.getOperand() method to check if the operand is a register or an immediate value, and comparing it to a string and a number."
LLVM,RISCV,1820,The next statement could be a possible comparison using the '==' operator to check if the register values obtained from the 'getOperand()' function are equal.
LLVM,RISCV,1821,"return isIntN ( <NUM_LIT> , BrOffset ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1822,"return BrOffset >= - <ISA_LIT> && BrOffset < <ISA_LIT> ;

""case <STR_LIT> : return BrOffset >= - <ISA_LIT> && BrOffset < <ISA_LIT>;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1823,The next statement will be a break statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1824,"The next statement could be:
return DestSourcePair { MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) } ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1825,"If F does not have LinkOnceODRLinkage, return true."
LLVM,RISCV,1826,if (F.hasPersonality()) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1827,The next statement will likely involve using the FrameIndex as a value in some other operation or assigning it to a variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1828,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,1829,"The next statement would be: ""return ! CheckFIs || any_of ( MI . operands ( ) , [ ] ( const MachineOperand & MO ) { return MO . isFI ( ) ; } ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1830,"</S>

return MO.getType() == MachineOperand::MO_FPImmediate;"
LLVM,RISCV,1831,"The next statement could be a line of code following the series of case statements, or it could be the end of a switch or if statement. It is difficult to accurately predict the specific next statement without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,1832,The next statement could be another case statement or an additional line of code.
LLVM,RISCV,1833,"}


The code will return the register at operand <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1834,"<s>

The next statement is:
return 0;"
LLVM,RISCV,1835,"MFI . setMemoryOperandNo ( MI , <NUM_LIT> )

if (IsZvlsseg) { 
  // do something
} else {
  // do something else
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1836,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,1837,"}

This code snippet is used to build a machine instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1838,"""else { report_fatal_error(<STR_LIT>); }"""
LLVM,RISCV,1839,"if (Target->succ_empty()) { 
    return;
}

if (Target->succ_size() == 1) {
    Target = *Target->succ_begin();
}
else {
    Cond.clear();
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1840,The next statement would be "else I->eraseFromParent();"
LLVM,RISCV,1841,"if (I == MBB.end())
    return <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,1842,"The next statement will use the ""CC"" variable to store the value of the ""Cond"" array at the index of the number literal, converted to the type specified by the string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,1843,return new InstrInfo(STI);
LLVM,RISCV,1844,return new InstrInfo();
LLVM,RISCV,1845,"Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; IsZvlsseg = false ; }>

The next statement is likely an if statement or a return statement based on the conditions and variables set in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,1846,if (STI.getTargetTriple().isArch64Bit()) Ok = isInt<<<NUM_LIT>>>(Imm); else Ok = isUInt<<<NUM_LIT>>>(Imm);
LLVM,RISCV,1847,break ;
LLVM,RISCV,1848,"The next statement would be: BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Opc), DstReg).addReg(SrcReg, getKillRegState(KillSrc)).addReg(SrcReg, getKillRegState(KillSrc));"
LLVM,RISCV,1849,"{

return MI->getOpcode();"
LLVM,RISCV,1850,"for (auto &C : RepeatedSequenceLocs) {
    C.setCallInfo(MachineOutlinerDefault, CallOverhead);
    C.setFrameOverhead(FrameOverhead); }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1851,if (MI.isCall()) return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;
LLVM,RISCV,1852,"A new instruction will be added to MBB with a specific opcode (determined by the value of ""Opc"") and two operands (both taken from a specific index of the ""Cond"" array). The instruction will also reference the MBB ""TBB"". If the ""BytesAdded"" argument is passed, the size of the instruction will be added to it. Then, the code will check if ""FBB"" is not equal to zero. If so, a new instruction will be added to MBB with a specific opcode (determined by the value of ""STR_LIT"") and one operand (taken from the """
LLVM,RISCV,1853,if (BytesAdded) * BytesAdded += getInstSizeInBytes(CondMI);
LLVM,RISCV,1854,Define a register called ScratchReg using the createVirtualRegister function from the MachineRegisterInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,1855,The next statement of this code snippet will likely involve closing curly brackets or a semicolon to properly end the "case" statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1856,A statement checking if the operand of MI is a Frame Index and getting the index value.
LLVM,RISCV,1857,"""There is a return statement for the case where MI's operand at index <NUM_LIT> is a frame index and a register."""
LLVM,RISCV,1858,"BuildMI ( MBB , I , DL , get ( Opcode ) , DstReg ) . addFrameIndex ( FI ) . addImm ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1859,Opcode += <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,1860,"MachineInstr * MI = BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(<STR_LIT>), DstReg)
    .addImm(Val)
    .setMIFlag(Flag);"
LLVM,RISCV,1861,"The next statement of this code snippet will be: 

<p>Return Result;"
LLVM,RISCV,1862,"""else if""`
`(hasSubClassEq(RC))`"
LLVM,RISCV,1863,MIB.add(MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));
LLVM,RISCV,1864,"} 

Another case statement might be expected."
LLVM,RISCV,1865,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> == The next statement of this code snippet is <STR_LIT> ( Val , STI . getFeatureBits ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1866,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , get ( Inst . Opc ) , Result ) . addReg ( SrcReg , RegState :: Kill ) . addImm ( Inst . Imm ) . setMIFlag ( Flag ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1867,"AsUnsigned
The next statement will be: if (STI.getTargetTriple().isArch64Bit()) Ok = isUInt <<NUM_LIT>> (Imm) ; else Ok = isUInt <<NUM_LIT>> (Imm); break;"
LLVM,RISCV,1868,"The next statement will check the value of the 'Ok' variable and if it is false, set the 'ErrInfo' variable to a string value and return false."
LLVM,RISCV,1869,The next statement will evaluate the safety of outlining MBB with the given flags using the TargetInstrInfo::isMBBSafeToOutlineFrom function and return the result.
LLVM,RISCV,1870,"If the TargetInstrInfo is safe to outline from the MBB with the given flags, the next statement would likely be a return true statement, indicating that it is safe to outline. Otherwise, the next statement would be a return false statement, indicating that it is not safe to outline."
LLVM,RISCV,1871,"} }

Break the switch statement and perform necessary operations on the MachineBasicBlock and MachineInstrBuilder variables. Finally, perform a check on the MachineOperand variables and replace a kill instruction if necessary."
LLVM,RISCV,1872,"LIS -> ReplaceMachineInstrInMaps ( MI , * MIB ) ;

None. The code snippet ends with this statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1873,"return<NUM_LIT>
998497

<NUM_LIT>  = 998497"
LLVM,RISCV,1874,"In this code snippet, the next statement would be to check if the current machine basic block instruction is an inline assembly code or a function call. If it is, the function will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,1875,II = MBB.begin();
LLVM,RISCV,1876,"<STD_LIT> If the condition is not met, the program will report a fatal error."
LLVM,RISCV,1877,"</s>

The next statement will check if a given string's sub-class is equal to ""RC"", and if so, assign the value ""Opcode"" to that string. If not, it will move on to the next ""else if"" statement. If none of the ""if"" conditions are met, a final statement will print ""llvm_unreachable""."
LLVM,RISCV,1878,"The next statement will be ""BuildMI (MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm(<NUM_LIT>);"" which will build a machine instruction for the specified opcode, destination register, and other parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,1879,"):
The next statement will be ""return;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1880,Another else statement with llvm_unreachable (<STR_LIT>).
LLVM,RISCV,1881,"This code snippet is predicting the next statement in a function called copyPhysReg, which takes six arguments - MBB, MBBI, DL, DstReg, SrcReg, and KillSrc - to copy a physical register to another register in a machine instruction. The code then uses assertions to check if the DstReg and SrcReg can be found in a specific location and if the kill flag is set. The next statement predicts that the function will then build a machine instruction (MI) in the basic block (MBB) at the iterator (MBBI) with the debug location (DL). The instruction will be of type"
LLVM,RISCV,1882,"""Return the assertion that the instruction information contains the destination register and the source register is killed."""
LLVM,RISCV,1883,"}

The statement will return the length of an inline assembly instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,1884,The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace to end the function.
LLVM,RISCV,1885,"MBB.insert(I, addReg(DstReg, FI, RC));"
LLVM,RISCV,1886,"</s>

<s>if (DL.isValid()) I++;</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1887,Expected output: The next statement of this code snippet is "return <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,1888,"This code snippet creates a debug location variable, checks to see if we have reached the end of the current machine basic block, and if not, assigns the debug location of the current instruction to the debug location variable. It then gets the machine function of the current basic block, and retrieves the frame information for that function. It is likely that the next statement will involve using the frame information in some way, such as retrieving the function's stack size or layout."
LLVM,RISCV,1889,MMO->getOffset();
LLVM,RISCV,1890,"}</s>

The function will return true if the destination register is greater than the source register and the difference between them is less than the specified number of registers."
LLVM,RISCV,1891,"The next statement would likely be a conditional statement that checks if the condition stated in the previous line is true or false. It could be something like:

if (DstReg > SrcReg && (DstReg - SrcReg) < NumRegs) {
  // Execute some code
} else {
  // Execute some other code
}"
LLVM,RISCV,1892,The next statement would be: break;
LLVM,RISCV,1893,"The next statement will build a machine instruction (hence the name of the variable ""BuildMI"") with the operation specified by the instruction information (TII) at the specified location (MBB, II, DL), and add the scaled register with the shift amount to the virtual register (VL)."
LLVM,RISCV,1894,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), Result).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).addImm(0)"
LLVM,RISCV,1895,The next statement is `break;`.
LLVM,RISCV,1896,"Epilogue

This code snippet is performing operations on a machine instruction. The next statement would likely involve checking for a specific flag, such as the ""isEarlyClobber()"" flag, and making any necessary adjustments or replacements based on that flag. It might also involve updating or manipulating data structures related to the LiveInterval or LiveRange, such as the interval's end slot or segment."
LLVM,RISCV,1897,"Since the ��return�� keyword is specified in the code, the next statement will be the execution of the ""isCompressibleInst"" function with the arguments MI, &ST, MRI, and STI. If the result of this function is true, the statement will return the value specified as <NUM_LIT>. If the result is false, the statement will continue to the next line, which is another ""return"" statement that calls the ""getSize"" function on the result of the ""get"" function with the argument Opcode."
LLVM,RISCV,1898,"The next statement is:

RS -> enterBasicBlockEnd(MBB);"
LLVM,RISCV,1899,"""return It ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,1900,"""Call the 'insert' function with parameters 'It', 'BuildMI', and 'MF' and store the result in 'MBB'. Then, return the updated 'It'."""
LLVM,RISCV,1901,"}

The next statement is ""FoundDef = true;"" This statement sets the boolean variable FoundDef to true."
LLVM,RISCV,1902,"The code will return a DestSourcePair object with the operands from the code snippet, and then break out of the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1903,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, get (Inst.Opc), DstReg).addImm (Inst.Imm).setMIFlag (Flag);"
LLVM,RISCV,1904,"The code will execute the first statement in the else block, which has not been provided in the snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,1905,"SubRegIdx = <STR_LIT> ; }

The next statement would be:

llvm_unreachable(""Incompatible address space for vector load/store"");"
LLVM,RISCV,1906,"If the condition of the if statement is not satisfied, the code will return an empty string."
LLVM,RISCV,1907,"The next statement could be the end of the function, or could be the beginning of a new if-statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1908,"</s>

return outliner :: InstrType :: Illegal ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1909,"Register N = MRI . createVirtualRegister ( & <STR_LIT> ) ; movImm ( MBB , II , DL , N , NumOfVReg , Flag ) ; if ( ! STI . hasStdExtM ( ) ) MF . getFunction ( ) . getContext ( ) . diagnose ( DiagnosticInfoUnsupported { MF . getFunction ( ) , <STR_LIT> } ) ; BuildMI ( MBB , II , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) , VL ) . addReg ( VL , RegState :: Kill ) . addReg ( N , RegState :: Kill ) . set"
LLVM,RISCV,1910,"""Unable to encode scaled RC instruction size in ADD/sub immediate ."" } )

The next statement would likely be an ""if"" statement comparing the value of NumOfVReg with a power of two."
LLVM,RISCV,1911,"break ; case <STR_LIT> : BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , get ( <STR_LIt>0(Mov64_nr ), DstReg ) . addReg ( RegSeqtackByid (Inst . Reg) ) . addImm ( Inst . Imm ) . setMIFlag ( Flag ) ; break ;

default: report_fatal_error(""Invalid operand kind"");"
LLVM,RISCV,1912,srcReg = dstReg
LLVM,RISCV,1913,"</ISA_LIT>

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,1914,"RVFI->setHasSpillVRs();
MFI.setStackID(FI, TargetStackID::<ISA_LIT>Vector);
BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode)).addReg(SrcReg, getKillRegState(IsKill)).addFrameIndex(FI);"
LLVM,RISCV,1915,"is<ISA_LIT>Vector = true ; }

Since there is an ""else if"" statement with the condition ""<STR_LIT>.hasSubClassEq(RC)"", the next statement could be either ""Opcode = <STR_LIT>;"" or ""Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; is<ISA_LIT>Vector = true ;"". It depends on whether the previous ""if"" and ""else if"" statements did not pass the condition and go to the next one."
LLVM,RISCV,1916,"NF = <NUM_LIT> ; LMul = <NUM_LIT> ; }
unsigned Nelems = 0;"
LLVM,RISCV,1917,"return None ; } }

The next statement would be a closing curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,1918,"return

 `None;`"
LLVM,RISCV,1919,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the ending curly bracket (}) to close the list of statements.
LLVM,RISCV,1920,"MO_CCALL }

{ MO_CXXCALL , <STR_LIT> }"
LLVM,RISCV,1921,"}

MachineInstr & MI = * BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( PseudoOpcode ) ) . addMBB ( FBB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1922,"MBB . addSuccessor ( TBB ) ; }</s>

The next statement could potentially be another conditional statement or a final statement to close the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1923,The next statement would be "MI.eraseFromParent():".
LLVM,RISCV,1924,None of the above cases have a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1925,"return MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . isReg ( ) && MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . isReg ( ) && MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getReg ( ) == MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getReg ( ) ;

Default:"
LLVM,RISCV,1926,"case <STR_LIT> :

""Illegal break statement"""
LLVM,RISCV,1927,"<NUM_LIT> ;
The next statement will be ""case <STR_LIT> :""."
LLVM,RISCV,1928,"""Execute the code using the base and size operands to return true."""
LLVM,RISCV,1929,"return getRegisterInfo ( ) -> <STR_LIT> ; </s>

""This function returns a value from the RegisterInfo class based on the opcode of the MachineInstr object provided."""
LLVM,RISCV,1930,The next statement is likely to be the closing brace for the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1931,Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; IsZvlsseg = false ;
LLVM,RISCV,1932,"The next statement would likely be the constructor declaration for the InstrInfo class, specifying the code to be executed when an InstrInfo object is created."
LLVM,RISCV,1933,"</ISA_LIT>

The next statement is likely a closing curly brace, indicating that the constructor function is ending."
LLVM,RISCV,1934,"The next statement would be an ""else"" statement after the final ""if"" statement, possibly containing code that handles an error or an impossible condition."
LLVM,RISCV,1935,"Opcode = <STR_LIT> ;

llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1936,"return <NUM_LIT> ;



The code returns a numerical value, <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1937,"return false ; }

if (I->getDesc().isIndirectBranch()) { return true; }"
LLVM,RISCV,1938,"return false ; }

return false"
LLVM,RISCV,1939,"return isIntN ( <NUM_LIT> , BrOffset ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1940,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,1941,This code snippet sets the immediate value of a conditional branch instruction to the opposite branch opcode.
LLVM,RISCV,1942,case <STR_LIT> : Ok = isRelativeBranch < <NUM_LIT> > ( Imm ) ; break ;
LLVM,RISCV,1943,"Prediction statement: 

I -> removeFromParent ();"
LLVM,RISCV,1944,"There will be an additional else if statement with multiple conditions and a call to BuildMI function, followed by a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1945,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Opc), DstReg)
  .addReg(SrcReg, getKillRegState(KillSrc));"
LLVM,RISCV,1946,"return getInlineAsmLength (MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getSymbolName(), *TM.getMCAsmInfo());"
LLVM,RISCV,1947,"The next statement in this code snippet will be another if statement, checking the values of MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).isFI(), MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).isImm(), and MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getImm() to see if they equal <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,1948,"retu

The next statement in the code snippet is an else statement, followed by two return statements."
LLVM,RISCV,1949,It is expected that the code will return a numerical value at this point.
LLVM,RISCV,1950,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to involve some sort of comparison or operation related to the MI (machine instruction) object being referenced multiple times. It could also potentially involve setting a value for the FrameIndex variable.
LLVM,RISCV,1951,llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)
LLVM,RISCV,1952,"if (I != MBB.end()) DL = I->getDebugLoc(); if (RC == &<STR_LIT>) BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(<STR_LIT>), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm(<NUM_LIT>-1));"
LLVM,RISCV,1953,"The code will either add a new instruction ""BuildMI"" to the current basic block MBB, or it will end the program and print an error message."
LLVM,RISCV,1954,"</s>

<s> else DL = DebugLoc ( ); </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,1955,"M3>

<s> debugInfo << ""saving register "" << TRI->getName(SrcReg) << "" into frame index "" << FI ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1956,The next statement could be "return <NUM_LIT> ;" after the case statements for TargetOpcode :: INLINEASM and TargetOpcode :: INLINEASM_BR.
LLVM,RISCV,1957,"}</s>

It is likely that the next statement will involve performing operations on the symbol name and MCAsmInfo of the target machine."
LLVM,RISCV,1958,"The next statement will probably involve the register ScratchReg being used in some capacity, possibly being killed or modified in some way. It is also possible that there could be another instruction or function call related to the destination basic block DestBB."
LLVM,RISCV,1959,Return instruction to end the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,1960,"The next statement is:
 assert ( isInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( NumOfVReg ) && <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1961,Create a pointer to the base register of the Load/Store operation and set the offset value to the immediate value of the second operand.
LLVM,RISCV,1962,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,1963,"}

The next statement in this code snippet is an ""else"" statement, indicating that the previous conditional statements were not met. The code within the ""else"" block adds a MachineMemOperand and builds the current instruction with the given Opcode, Destination Register, Frame Index, and Memory Operand."
LLVM,RISCV,1964,<STR_LIT> . hasSubClassEq ( RC ) ) Opcode = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,1965,"}

The next statement will check if the source register is contained in the target register and if not, it will add a new instruction to the machine basic block that copies the source register value to the target register, with an additional immediate value."
LLVM,RISCV,1966,llvm_unreachable( <STR_LIT> );
LLVM,RISCV,1967,The next statement will be: MBB.addCaptureInfo(Opcode);
LLVM,RISCV,1968,Opcode = <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,1969,"The next statement would be the llvm_unreachable() function call, followed by the BuildMI() function call."
LLVM,RISCV,1970,The next statement is "else if (<STR_LIT>.hasSubClassEq(RC)) Opcode = <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,1971,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), Result).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).setMIFlag(Flag);"
LLVM,RISCV,1972,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI <STR{
""_IS {
,

Why was it necessary to use assert() in this code?

To ensure that the variable ""Seq"" is not empty, as it is being used in the following for-loop."
LLVM,RISCV,1973,The next statement will be to return the length of the inline assembly code specified by the machine instruction's operand at index <NUM_LIT> using the target machine's assembly info.
LLVM,RISCV,1974,"</s>

An error message, as the code has not been properly closed with a closing curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,1975,The next statement could be: "return None;"
LLVM,RISCV,1976,"It is likely that the next statement will be ""break;"", which will signal the end of the ""case"" portion of the code block. This will then be followed by a ""return None;"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1977,assert(TBB);
LLVM,RISCV,1978,"} 

The code is continuing to analyze branches and check for conditions."
LLVM,RISCV,1979,"return ; }

In the last else if statement, the opcode will be determined and another instruction will be built using the given parameters, and the code will then return."
LLVM,RISCV,1980,"return false ;

This code snippet does not contain enough information to predict the next statement. It is likely that the code snippet will either continue within the switch statement, or will end with a closing bracket ""}"" to end the function. However, without knowing the specific opcode being checked or the code within the switch cases, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,1981,"} else { return InsertBranchAtInst ( MBB , MBB . end ( ) , TBB , Cond , DL ) ; </s>

If FBB is true, we will set the count variable to the result of InsertBranchAtInst with the parameters MBB, MBB.end(), TBB, Cond, and DL. Then, we will build a machine instruction for the MBB with debug location DL and add the MBB FBB."
LLVM,RISCV,1982,"Assuming the code snippet is not continued any further, the next statement would most likely be the closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,1983,"case <STR_LIT> :
BuildMI ( MBB , I , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) .addMBB ( TBB ) . addReg ( Cond [ <NUM_LIT> ] . getReg ( ) ) .addReg ( Cond [ <NUM_LIT> ] . getReg ( ) ) ; break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1984,"The next statement will be in the default case, where the code will execute ""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);""."
LLVM,RISCV,1985,That depends on the return value of the isSimpleMove function.
LLVM,RISCV,1986,"}


The next statement would most likely be:

if (FrameIndex == <NUM_LIT>) { return <NUM_LIT>; }"
LLVM,RISCV,1987,"}

The code will check if the MCID is in the TSFlags and if the MI has the same index and register as the FrameIndex. It will then return the register from the MI operand."
LLVM,RISCV,1988,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement checking if the instruction is a store operation, followed by a comparison to see if the instruction is storing to a specific stack slot indicated by the FrameIndex variable."
LLVM,RISCV,1989,"return <STR_LIT> ;

case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,1990,"Since the code snippet doesn't have an opening curly brace, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,1991,The next statement will be: return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,1992,We cannot predict the next statement without more context as the code snippet provided is incomplete.
LLVM,RISCV,1993,"</S>

""Retrieve the high 20 bits of Val and bit-shift them by 16, storing the result in Hi20. Then, retrieve the low 12 bits and sign extend them by shifting them by 16, storing the result in Lo12. Finally, use the BuildMI function to build the instruction, passing in the MachineBasicBlock, MachineBasicBlock::iterator, DebugLoc, and register DstReg as arguments. Add the immediate value Hi20 to the instruction and set the MIFlag to Flag."""
LLVM,RISCV,1994,"if ( OldCond != <NUM_LIT> )

The next statement is a closing bracket (})."
LLVM,RISCV,1995,"</ISA_LIT>



It is likely that the DL variable will be used in the upcoming code to store a debug location for the loaded register."
LLVM,RISCV,1996,llvm_unreachable("Unexpected register class for loadRegFromStackSlot")
LLVM,RISCV,1997,The next statement could be the beginning of a function or constructor definition for the InstrInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,1998,The next statement is most likely a function or method call using the variables declared in the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,1999,"This code snippet does not contain a complete statement. The next line would likely continue the if statement, defining the value of Opcode based on the condition."
LLVM,RISCV,2000,"The next statement would be to return the value of Opc, which is determined by checking if the provided DstReg and SrcReg values are contained within <STR_LIT>. If so, Opc will be set to the first <STR_LIT>, otherwise it will be set to the second <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2001,"""The next return statement will return a numerical literal."" }"
LLVM,RISCV,2002,return <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,2003,"}

This code snippet is incomplete and does not have a next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2004,The code is likely inside a function and the next statement could be a closing curly brace "}".
LLVM,RISCV,2005,"return <STR_LIT> ;

case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2006,The statement would likely involve checking if the <Cond> condition has been met and then potentially performing some action based on that result. It may also involve updating the <BytesAdded> variable by calling the getInstSizeInBytes() function.
LLVM,RISCV,2007,"This code snippet is a function definition for the function ""isLoadFromStackSlot"" which takes in a MachineInstr reference ""MI"" and an integer reference ""FrameIndex"" as parameters. It first performs a switch statement on the opcode of the MachineInstr ""MI"". The next statement to be executed would be the ""default"" case which returns a number. The following cases will then be checked, and if none of them match, the code will then move on to the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2008,"If none of the conditions in the if statement are met, the code will return <NUM_LIT>, which is a numeric value."
LLVM,RISCV,2009,The next statement will be "FrameIndex = MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getIndex();"
LLVM,RISCV,2010,The code snippet is likely to contain an if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2011,The next statement will be: return Opcode;
LLVM,RISCV,2012,llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,2013,"The next statement will be ""BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) , DstReg ) . addImm ( Lo12 ) . setMIFlag ( Flag ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2014,Cond .back() = MachineOperand::CreateImm(Target) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2015,Cond . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2016,return <NUM_LIT>;
LLVM,RISCV,2017,0
LLVM,RISCV,2018,Cond[<NUM_LIT>] will be set to a new value using the getOppositeBranchOpcode function.
LLVM,RISCV,2019,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could vary depending on the value of the <NUM_LIT> and the specific implementation of the methods used.
LLVM,RISCV,2020,The next statement is most likely the opening curly brace for a function or class definition.
LLVM,RISCV,2021,"__InstrInfo_print ( ) ; }

Call the constructor function for the InstrInfo class and print the output."
LLVM,RISCV,2022,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2023,llvm_unreachable (<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,2024,"The next statement will create a new InstructionSelector object, passing in the parameters of a TargetMachine object, a Subtarget object, and a RegisterBankInfo object, and assigning them to the corresponding member variables of the InstructionSelector class."
LLVM,RISCV,2025,"InstructionSelector is called with the arguments TM, STI, and RBI and the values of STI, TII, TRI, and RBI are set."
LLVM,RISCV,2026,"return new ISA_LITInstructionSelector(TM, Subtarget, RBI);"
LLVM,RISCV,2027,"The next statement will likely be some form of method call or variable assignment using the newly created object, such as calling a specific method on the InstructionSelector object or assigning it to a variable for later use."
LLVM,RISCV,2028,"</s>

return name"
LLVM,RISCV,2029,"}

""The string 'DEBUG_TYPE' will be returned and assigned to another variable."
LLVM,RISCV,2030,"The next statement would be the start of the function body, which will include instructions for selecting appropriate instructions for the target machine."
LLVM,RISCV,2031,TM (TM)
LLVM,RISCV,2032,"</s

>This code snippet is returning"
LLVM,RISCV,2033,The next statement would be: "}"
LLVM,RISCV,2034,"This code snippet will return a new instance of the DAGToDAGISel class, passing in the TM and OptLevel variables as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,2035,"}</s>

""The function returns the value of the current statement."""
LLVM,RISCV,2036,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be a comparison statement using the boolean operators && or ||, which will return a boolean value."
LLVM,RISCV,2037,"return IsBase ; } else { return false ; }

AM.R = TestOffset;"
LLVM,RISCV,2038,"The next statement would be ""return ;"" This statement will only execute if the previous ""else if"" condition is met, meaning that the ""Base"" value is of a different value type than the one specified in the code snippet. If this condition is met, the code will insert a new node, ""Trunc"", and replace the current ""Base"" value with the newly created node. After this operation is complete, the code will then return from the function."
LLVM,RISCV,2039,"return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, SDLoc(Node), Node->getValueType(nullptr));"
LLVM,RISCV,2040,"</NUM_LIT>


This code snippet likely returns a target constant defined by the current DAG, using the specified immediate value and the value type of the node."
LLVM,RISCV,2041,The code snippet has reached the end and will terminate.
LLVM,RISCV,2042,"This code snippet appears to assign the current node in the graph (DAG) to a new position, using a method called RepositionNode. It then gets an iterator from the current position and assigns the current node to it. The next line sets the node ID of the current position to the node ID from the iterator. It seems likely that the next statement would be a closing bracket, as this appears to be the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,2043,<s> return (Val == 0);
LLVM,RISCV,2044,"</s>

The next statement could be any code statement that is valid within a for loop, such as a conditional statement, assignment statement, or function call. It is not possible to predict the next specific statement without knowing the content of the for loops."
LLVM,RISCV,2045,The next statement would likely be the closing curly brace to end the function declaration.
LLVM,RISCV,2046,"<ISA_LIT>AddressingMode ( AddrForm form , OffRange offr ) : Form ( form ) , OffR ( offr ) , Base ( ) , Offset ( <NUM_LIT> ) , Operand ( Operand ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2047,return "return Subtarget.getTargetLowering();";
LLVM,RISCV,2048,"< /s>

The next statement is likely to be related to the initialization of variables or function definitions within the DAGToDAGISel class."
LLVM,RISCV,2049,return ret;
LLVM,RISCV,2050,"}

The code may contain logic and instructions to manipulate data in a MachineFunction object and may return a boolean value indicating whether or not the manipulation was successful."
LLVM,RISCV,2051,"Counter; </s>

Assuming the code snippet continues after the last statement shown, the next statement will likely be another case in the switch statement, or the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2052,OutOps . push_back ( Op ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2053,Base = Addr.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,2054,"This code snippet appears to be incomplete and does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It is possible that the next statement would declare a variable or call a function using the <STR_LIT> value as an argument. However, without more context, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2055,"This code snippet is checking if the opcode of the address object is a string literal. If it is, then the target variable is set to the operand at index 0. If the check is not true, then the code returns false."
LLVM,RISCV,2056,"}

There is no more code to be executed."
LLVM,RISCV,2057,"if (Addr->getOpcode() != ISD::TargetConstant) {
    Base = Addr;
    return true;
}

Following the conditional statement, the next statement will assign the value of Addr to the reference variable Base and return true."
LLVM,RISCV,2058,"if (Op1.getNode()) Lower = CurDAG -> getNode(Opcode, DL, VT, Op1, Lower);"
LLVM,RISCV,2059,This code snippet is checking for a specific <STR_LIT> opcode and value type <STR_LIT> and then performing a replacement of the current node with a new node. The next statement will most likely be another <STR_LIT> comparison or a return statement to end the function.
LLVM,RISCV,2060,"The next statement will likely be:
 
<SYM_LIT> <SPACE> CurDAG -> init ( getTargetMachine ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2061,}</s>
LLVM,RISCV,2062,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specifics of the code and its context.
LLVM,RISCV,2063,return N & ((1 << 5) - 1);
LLVM,RISCV,2064,"The code will return the result of the selectShiftMask function with the parameters N, Subtarget->getXLen(), and ShAmt."
LLVM,RISCV,2065,"The next statement will be to return the result of calling the selectShiftMask function with the parameters N, Subtarget->getXLen(), and ShAmt."
LLVM,RISCV,2066,The next statement will print out some debugging information and then call the "dump" function on the Base operand with the "CurDAG" argument.
LLVM,RISCV,2067,<p> return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2068,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2069,Return false
LLVM,RISCV,2070,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the code snippet. The blank spaces and brackets make it difficult to understand the intended logic.
LLVM,RISCV,2071,"</s>

return std::count(node->users().begin(), node->users().end(), this) == node.getNumOperands();"
LLVM,RISCV,2072,"The next statement will be to return the result of the hasAllNBitUsers function, passing in the Node and NUM_LIT as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,2073,Position--;
LLVM,RISCV,2074,"CurDAG -> getMemIntrinsicNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VTs , Ops , <STR_LIT> , MPI , Align ( <NUM_LIT> ) , MachineMemOperand :: MOLoad )"
LLVM,RISCV,2075,"SrcReg = SDValue ( Result , <NUM_LIT> ) ; } return Result ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2076,"CurDAG -> setNodeMemRefs(cast <MachineSDNode>(Load), { MemOp });"
LLVM,RISCV,2077,} else { return false; }
LLVM,RISCV,2078,VL = N;
LLVM,RISCV,2079,"}
{ VL = CurDAG -> getNode ( <OP_T0>, SDLoc(N), N->getValueType(0, <NUM_LIT>, SomeSDValue)) }"
LLVM,RISCV,2080,An error will be reported if the IndexLog2EEW is equal to 0 and the subtarget is not 64-bit.
LLVM,RISCV,2081,The next statement will be an 'if' statement checking whether or not VLMax is true.
LLVM,RISCV,2082,The code will return false if the opcode of N is not equal to <STR_LIT> or if the operand at index <NUM_LIT> is not undefined.
LLVM,RISCV,2083,"Return the function to be executed

SplatVal = DAG.getTargetConstant(SplatImm, SDLoc(N), XLenVT); return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2084,if (SplatVal != nullptr) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2085,"""CurDAG->getNode(SplatVal, SDLoc(N), Subtarget->getXLenVT());"""
LLVM,RISCV,2086,"The next statement is probably a function call to ReplaceNode(Node, Store)."
LLVM,RISCV,2087,The next statement is an if statement that checks if the variable IsMasked is true.
LLVM,RISCV,2088,The code snippet will enter the "case <STR_LIT> :" statement and check for a specific condition.
LLVM,RISCV,2089,"SrcReg = SDValue(Result, <NUM_LIT> + 1);"
LLVM,RISCV,2090,The code snippet will replace uses of the current node with a value from a loaded machine node and then remove the current node from the DAG.
LLVM,RISCV,2091,The next statement will be to set the memory references for the Load instruction using the setNodeMemRefs function.
LLVM,RISCV,2092,"CurDAG->getNode(Log2SEW, DL, XLenVT, SuperReg)"
LLVM,RISCV,2093,"""IndexLMUL = TargetLowering::getLMUL(IndexVT); unsigned IndexLog2EEW = Log2_32(IndexVT.getScalarSizeInBits());"""
LLVM,RISCV,2094,"}

ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, I+1), CurDAG->getTargetExtractSubreg(SubRegIdx, DL, VT, SuperReg));"
LLVM,RISCV,2095,"The next statement will be:

CurDAG->setRoot(Store);"
LLVM,RISCV,2096,"The next statement is ""Node -> setOperand(StoreVal, Operands)""."
LLVM,RISCV,2097,The next statement would likely be an assignment of a value to the variable "AddBaseIdx" or the execution of a "return false" statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2098,"if ( ! TSFlags || ! <STR_LIT> ( TSFlags ) ) return false ; 

`return false;`"
LLVM,RISCV,2099,The next statement would likely be a break statement since it follows a check for a machine opcode and an unsigned integer value.
LLVM,RISCV,2100,The next statement would be "default: return true;".
LLVM,RISCV,2101,The next statement should be a closing curly brace for the isAllUndef function.
LLVM,RISCV,2102,"The next statement will be a closing bracket for the for loop, indicating the end of the loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2103,"MachineSDNode * Store = CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( P -> Pseudo , DL , XLenVT , VTypeOp , Operands )"
LLVM,RISCV,2104,"ReplaceUses ( SDValue ( Node , NF + 2 ) , SDValue ( Load , 0 ) )"
LLVM,RISCV,2105,"The next statement could be: Operands.push_back(CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Log2_32(Sew), DL, XLenVT));"
LLVM,RISCV,2106,"<sAILs>

The next statement will most likely be a continuation of the if-else chain, possibly checking for additional types of nodes or performing some other operation on the current node."
LLVM,RISCV,2107,No more statements.
LLVM,RISCV,2108,The next statement will likely involve assigning a value to the variable "Result" based on the condition in the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2109,"// Perform a null check and assign SDImm to Result if it passes
 if (Result != nullptr) { 
   Result = SDImm;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2110,"return true ; } 

The next statement would most likely be:
 if ( N . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> && cast < VTSDNode > ( N . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) -> getVT ( <NUM_LIT> ) . bitsGT ( <STR_LIT> ) ) { Val = N ; return true ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2111,"""if (N.getOpcode() == <STR_LIT> && cast<VTSDNode>(N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>))->getVT().bitsLE(<STR_LIT>)) { return true; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2112,"CurDAG -> RemoveModifiedNode ( Node ) ; }

ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, NF), CurDAG->getTargetExtractSubreg(SubregIdx, DL, VT, SuperReg));"
LLVM,RISCV,2113,"}>


SDValue VLSEGFF = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::VLSEGFF, DL, VT, XLenVT, ScalarSize, LMUL, Operands);"
LLVM,RISCV,2114,"The next statement might be:

SDValue MaskedLoad = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::VECTOR_LOAD, SDLoc(Node), P->getValueType(MaskedLoadTy), Operands);"
LLVM,RISCV,2115,"Potential next statement: 
Node->addOperand(StoreVal);"
LLVM,RISCV,2116,SetNodeMemRefs will be called on Store with a single MemOperand from MemOp.
LLVM,RISCV,2117,"""CurDAG->setNodeMemRefs(Store, {MemOp->getMemOperand()});"""
LLVM,RISCV,2118,IndexVT = getVT ( MVT::iPTR )
LLVM,RISCV,2119,")

There is a missing closing curly brace in the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2120,"The next statement could be another conditional statement, or a return statement depending on the values of the variables and operands used in the previous statements. It is not possible to accurately predict the exact statement without further information."
LLVM,RISCV,2121,LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << <STR_LIT> << "Selected node: " << N->getMachineOpcode() << "\n");
LLVM,RISCV,2122,The code is checking for certain conditions and transforms the ImmOperand value before printing debug information and dumping Base.
LLVM,RISCV,2123,"return false ; }

""The function will return false if the first condition is not met."""
LLVM,RISCV,2124,"This code snippet is expecting to perform a peephole load, store, and ADDI operation."
LLVM,RISCV,2125,"} break ; }

The next statement will be a closing bracket for the ""switch"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2126,break
LLVM,RISCV,2127,"} }</s>

return Result;"
LLVM,RISCV,2128,"The next statement of this code snippet is: 

CurDAG -> InsetNode(Result);"
LLVM,RISCV,2129,"/*

""case <STR_LIT>: { uint64_t DemandedElts = maskFloorLog2(Mask) + 1; } break;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2130,"""RS1 = Shl.getOperand(<NUM_LIT> + 1)"""
LLVM,RISCV,2131,"The next statement could be to set the variable RS1 to be equal to the operand of Shl at index <NUM_LIT>, followed by setting the variable Shamt to a generated target constant value using CurDAG and Shl's second operand's value type, and then returning true."
LLVM,RISCV,2132,"</s>

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2133,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2134,auto Mul = cast
LLVM,RISCV,2135,"}

The next statement of this code snippet is ""for ( <STR_LIT> & Inst : Seq ) {""."
LLVM,RISCV,2136,"In the next statement, the code will return the value of Result."
LLVM,RISCV,2137,"SDValue ConstNode = cast < ConstantSDNode > (Node);

if (VT != XLenVT) {
  uint64_t Imm = ConstNode -> getZExtValue();
  ReplaceNode (Node, CurDAG -> getMachineNode(<STR_LIT>,  DL, VT, CurDAG -> getRegister(<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>), CurDAG -> getTargetConstant(Imm, DL, VT)));
  return;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2138,"return true ; } else { RS1 = N . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; </s>

The code will return the value of RS1 and Shamt, and set them equal to the operand of N at index <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2139,"This code snippet is likely performing a series of operations and checks on various operands and node types. Based on the pattern of the code, the next statement is likely going to be another if statement or a return statement, as the code appears to be checking conditions and then returning a value or continuing to the next step if the conditions are met."
LLVM,RISCV,2140,"The code will check if the values of VC2 and VC3 match the specified conditions, and if so, set RS1 to Shl.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>) and Shamt to a constant value calculated using VC1 and SDLoc. The function will then return true."
LLVM,RISCV,2141,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2142,Returns false
LLVM,RISCV,2143,"The next statement is ""ImmOperand = CurDAG -> getTargetConstant ( CombinedOffset , SDLoc ( ImmOperand ) , ImmOperand . getValueType ( ) ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2144,return;
LLVM,RISCV,2145,"</s>


The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,2146,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the function ""TLI.expandInlineAsm"" with parameters ""MPI,"" ""N,"" and ""CurDAG"" to handle the inline assembly instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,2147,"The next statement is SDValue VecOp = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, DL, MVT::getVectorVT(VT).getTypeForEVT(*DAG.getContext()), N, Lo, Hi, VL, CurDAG->getTargetConstant(SVE_VQ, DL, MVT::i32));

This statement creates a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing an instruction that inserts a subvector (VL) into a larger vector (N) at the specified indices (Lo and Hi). It also uses the SVE_VQ value to specify the vector length for"
LLVM,RISCV,2148,"""else { return false; }"""
LLVM,RISCV,2149,</
LLVM,RISCV,2150,if (Addr is a FrameIndexSDNode and is able to be cast into an auto variable FIN) then the Base variable will be set to the target frame index at the index of FIN and the subtarget's XLenVT.
LLVM,RISCV,2151,"if (auto *FIN = dyn_cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(Base))

<ESA_LIT>
= CurDAG->>
getTargetFrameIndex(FIN->getIndex(), Subtarget->getXLenVT());

throw <EXC_LIT>None, std::invalid_argument(Addr->getInteger());


return Base;"
LLVM,RISCV,2152,// This code snippet may not have enough context or complete code to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2153,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the specific values for ""Base"", ""CurDAG"", ""FIN"", and ""Subtarget"". However, it is likely that there will be additional code following this statement, as the ""return true;"" line implies that the function has not yet completed its task."
LLVM,RISCV,2154,"}</s>

The next statement would be the closing bracket for the switch statement, followed by the closing bracket for the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2155,"</s>

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2156,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could potentially continue with more code or end there.
LLVM,RISCV,2157,"The next statement of this code snippet is:

} SelectCode ( Node ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2158,"As there is no other code following this snippet, the next prediction would be the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2159,"None, this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2160,"LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Could not find constant or global address for combined offset"" << ""\n"");
LLVM_DEBUG(Base->dump(CurDAG));
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Could not combine offset for Node"" << ""\n"");
LLVM_DEBUG(N->dump(CurDAG));"
LLVM,RISCV,2161,"LLVM_DEBUG (dbgs() << ""<STR_LIT>""); LLVM_DEBUG (Base->dump(CurDAG)); LLVM_DEBUG (dbgs() << ""<STR_LIT>""); LLVM_DEBUG (N->dump(CurDAG)); LLVM_DEBUG (dbgs() << ""<STR_LIT>"");
if (BaseOpIdx == <NUM_LIT>)
CurDAG->UpdateNodeOperand(N, Base->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>),ImmOperand, N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));
else
CurDAG->UpdateNodeOperand(N, N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), Base->"
LLVM,RISCV,2162,"The next statement could potentially be another ""case"" or ""default"" statement, continuing the pattern of switching between different <NUM_LIT> and returning <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2163,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the constants being compared.
LLVM,RISCV,2164,SDValue Shl = N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2165,"It is likely that there will be another assert statement or return statement after this block of code, as the code is still within an if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2166,assert ( N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)->isIntTy() );
LLVM,RISCV,2167,"<MustaF19Ans21>

None, as this code snippet does not have enough context to make a prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,2168,"InstIdx <NUM_LIT> , mSubIdx <NUM_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,2169,"</s>

Iterate through the vector of registers starting at index 1 and ending at <NUM_LIT> + NF - 1."
LLVM,RISCV,2170,The next statement is to loop through the remaining elements in the node and replaced them with the new target extract subreg.
LLVM,RISCV,2171,"The next statement is `SDValue SuperReg = SDValue ( Load , <NUM_LIT> + <NUM_LIT>)`."
LLVM,RISCV,2172,"The next statement would be a declaration of a new SDNode called ""Load"" using the getMachineNode function with the arguments P->Pseudo, DL, STR_LIT, STR_LIT, and Operands."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,2173,"This code snippet is used to insert an instruction for loading a value from memory using the given index. The next statement of this code snippet would be to initialize a variable ""Load"" with the ""getMachineNode"" function, passing in the instruction type ""P->Pseudo"" and the necessary parameters for the instruction, including the desired register, the desired data type, and the operands."
LLVM,RISCV,2174,"The for loop will continue executing for I = NF, and then the ReplaceUses function will be called with SDValue(Node, NF) and SDValue(Load, 0) as arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,2175,EVT IndexXLenVT = Subtarget -> getXLenVT()
LLVM,RISCV,2176,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2177,"The next statement is likely to be a return statement, with the condition being ""false""."
LLVM,RISCV,2178,std::cout << "The value of SplatImm is not a valid unsigned integer.";
LLVM,RISCV,2179,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,2180,"The next statement is probably:
<PRED_LIT> StoreNode = CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( <NUM_LIT> , SDLoc ( Node ) , Node -> getVTList ( ) , Operands ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2181,"The next statement will check if the variable IsStrided is true or false, and then add additional operands to the Operands vector based on that condition."
LLVM,RISCV,2182,"The next statement of this code snippet is:

return Store;"
LLVM,RISCV,2183,Operations that are performed on the operands of the "Node" variable to create a new "StoreVal" variable.
LLVM,RISCV,2184,"The next statement is: 
Node->getOperand(<NUM_LIT> + NF + <NUM_LIT>)"
LLVM,RISCV,2185,Store the calculated pseudo value in the current DAG and assign it to the variable "Store".
LLVM,RISCV,2186,"The next statement is:

<VAR_LIT> ReplaceNode ( Node , Store ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2187,"The next statement would likely be the beginning of another case statement, such as ""case <STR_LIT>:"" or a default statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2188,"}

The next statement could potentially check if the user is a ConstantSDNode and return true if it is."
LLVM,RISCV,2189,DEBUG(dbgs() << "Instructions:")
LLVM,RISCV,2190,The next statement would be if ( Opcode == <STR_LIT> && VT == XLenVT ) {
LLVM,RISCV,2191,The next statement is likely to involve the ending of a code block or a function with "}" and "}".
LLVM,RISCV,2192,"The code will continue iterating through allnodes_iterator until the if condition is met, where it will print out the string literals defined in the LLVM_DEBUG statements."
LLVM,RISCV,2193,Do another operation or return a result.
LLVM,RISCV,2194,"}
There may be additional functions called in the PostprocessISelDAG method after the doPeepholeBuildPairF64SplitF64 function is executed."
LLVM,RISCV,2195,"If the opcode value is equal to something else, the code will enter the second if statement and create a new SDValue called Imm with a value of <NUM_LIT>, and also create a new SDValue called TFI which contains the index value of FI and the value type of Node."
LLVM,RISCV,2196,The next statement is "auto * ConstNode = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Node ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2197,"if ( Bits < <NUM_LIT> ) return false ; if ( ! consumeError ( <callee> <callee> <callee> follow the <STR_LIT> branch.

The next statement of this code snippet is most likely the end of the switch statement, followed by a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2198,Offsets may need to be adjusted for stack length.
LLVM,RISCV,2199,"If none of the previous conditions are met, VL will be assigned the value of N."
LLVM,RISCV,2200,"isConstantMask ( Op0 . getNode ( ) , Mask ), SDValue New= SDValue ( CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( <NUM_LIT> , SDLoc ( Node ) , MVT::uint32_t, Op0 , CurDAG -> getTargetConstant ( ShAmt, {#.uint32
 $@ ReplaceNode""

if (Op1.getOpcode() == ISD::ARMISD::BICMaskInv) {
    imm BICMaskInv construct instruction, replace SDNode with ArmISD::BICMaskInv.
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2201,"ReplaceNode ( Node , CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VT , Op0 , CurDAG -> getTargetConstant ( <NUM_LIT> , DL , VT ) , Op1 ) ) ; } return ; } break ; }
  
The code will check if the given Node is a machine opcode. If it is, it will print out a debug message and set its node ID to -1. Otherwise, it will check the opcode of the node and perform different actions depending on the opcode. If the opcode is ""STR_LIT"", the code will cast the Node to a Constant"
LLVM,RISCV,2202,"The next statement would be:

return VL;"
LLVM,RISCV,2203,VL = N;
LLVM,RISCV,2204,"}

The next statement would be: if (VT == <STR_LIT>) { Opcode = <STR_LIT>; imm = (Shuffle->getMaskElt(<NUM_LIT>) & <NUM_LIT>) << <NUM_LIT>; imm |= (Shuffle->getMaskElt(<NUM_LIT>) & <NUM_LIT>) << <NUM_LIT>; imm |= (Shuffle->getMaskElt(<NUM_LIT>) & <NUM_LIT>) << <NUM_LIT>; imm |= Shuffle->getMaskElt(<NUM_LIT>) & <NUM_LIT>; } else {"
LLVM,RISCV,2205,"</s>

The next statement of the code snippet will probably involve checking conditions and evaluating expressions in order to determine if the inputs, SRC1 and SRC2, should be selected for use as the instruction's operands. It may also involve setting up the necessary data structures to generate the machine code for the corresponding PCLIP instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,2206,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2207,The next statement could be an if statement or a comment describing the purpose of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,2208,"The next statement would likely be CurDAG -> ReplaceAllUsesWith(Or.getNode(), Lower); which replaces all uses of the old Node with the new Or node and removes the now-unused Node from the DAG."
LLVM,RISCV,2209,"EVT RetTy = getPointerTy ( CurDAG )

The next statement would be:

return RetTy;"
LLVM,RISCV,2210,"return ; } }

The next statement is the closing curly bracket in the ""switch"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2211,"return ;
break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2212,"SDValue NewShl = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::SHL, SDLoc(N), MVT::i32, Shl.getOperand(1), DAG.getTargetConstant(32, SDLoc(N), MVT::i32));"
LLVM,RISCV,2213,N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) -> getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,2214,"else if ( simm12 && ! signExtend ) Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; else if ( ! simm12 && signExtend ) Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; else Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ;}
The next statement is:
else Opcode = <STR_LIT> ; break ;}"
LLVM,RISCV,2215,"for (int i = 0; i < LoopDecrement; i++) {}}</s>

The next statement will be a closing brace, signifying the end of the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2216,"} 

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowledge of the values of the different variables and operands involved in the code snippet. The next statement could potentially be a conditional statement, a function call, or a return statement depending on the evaluation of the conditions and variables at runtime."
LLVM,RISCV,2217,The next statement is "++Position;" which increments the "Position" iterator.
LLVM,RISCV,2218,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context. It appears to be a block of code related to debugging, but without knowing the language or purpose of the code, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2219,return <ISA_LIT>FunctionPass ( );
LLVM,RISCV,2220,return NextInstruction();
LLVM,RISCV,2221,"} }

if (auto *ConstNode = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Node->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)))"
LLVM,RISCV,2222,"Operands . push_back ( Chain ) ; </s>

Node->getOperand(CurOp++);"
LLVM,RISCV,2223,The next statement will likely contain a declaration or initialization of a variable that uses the RegClassIDs array.
LLVM,RISCV,2224,"return createTupleImpl ( CurDAG , Regs , RegClassIDs [ NF - <NUM_LIT> ] , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2225,"The prediction is that the code snippet will create a tuple using the current directed acyclic graph (CurDAG), a list of registers (Regs), a register class ID (RegClassIDs) with index NF-2, and a string literal <STR_LIT>, and return it."
LLVM,RISCV,2226,"return createTupleImpl ( CurDAG , Regs , RegClassIDs [ NF - <NUM_LIT> ] , <STR_LIT>) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2227,"The predicted statement is:
Result: Tuple object created with specified inputs."
LLVM,RISCV,2228,"</s>

""CurDAG is passed, along with Regs and a new ExprType, to the createTupleImpl function."""
LLVM,RISCV,2229,"</s>

<s> This code creates and returns a new instance of the DAGToDAGISel class, passing in the specified TargetMachine object. </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,2230,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2231,"}


Ops.push_back(CurDAG.getTargetConstant(RegClassID, DL, <STR_LIT>));"
LLVM,RISCV,2232,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2233,"return true ;


The next statement will be: ReplaceUses ( N , N0 . getNode ( ) ) ; return true ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2234,">


The next statement would be ""SDValue N01 = N0 . getOperand (1);"", where 1 is the <NUM_LIT> value of the second case statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2235,The code will return a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,2236,MadeChange |= doPeepholeIMUL (N);
LLVM,RISCV,2237,The next statement may be a return statement or a new statement that manipulates the result of the memory intrinsic.
LLVM,RISCV,2238,"<s> virtual void atSelect ( void ) const override {
  std::cout << ""Selecting instructions..."" << std::endl;
}

""The next statement will be a function declaration for the atSelect method that overrides the virtual function in the base SelectionDAGISel class and prints out a message to the console."""
LLVM,RISCV,2239,return TargetMachine.run();
LLVM,RISCV,2240,"This code assigns the Subtarget variable to the result of a function call that uses the Subtarget parameter from the MF variable, using the <ISA_LIT>Subtarget parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,2241,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2242,The next statement is: "return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2243,"The next statement will be to assign the result of the machine node Creation, with the appropriate parameters, to the variable SrcReg."
LLVM,RISCV,2244,The return value will be true.
LLVM,RISCV,2245,"C -> isUndef ( ) }

True


The next statement would be ""return true;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2246,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2247,"""Simplify the if statement with the ConstantSDNode as the condition"""
LLVM,RISCV,2248,A semicolon will close the statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2249,P->MemRefInfo = Node->getMemReferenceInfo();
LLVM,RISCV,2250,The code will create a MachineSDNode called Load with the information provided by P and Operands.
LLVM,RISCV,2251,"<STR_LIT> return SDValue ( ReadVL , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2252,"The next statement would most likely be:
Node->op_begin() = Operands;"
LLVM,RISCV,2253,"}

If the current node's opcode is not equal to any of the specified opcodes, the function will return true and assign the current node's operand at index specified by the <NUM_LIT> literal to the SplatVal variable."
LLVM,RISCV,2254,"For any given DAGNode in variable N, this function will return a boolean value indicating whether or not a VSplatSimm5 operation can be applied to it, and if so, the corresponding SplatVal will be assigned."
LLVM,RISCV,2255,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,2256,"I think the next statement will involve using the ""Imm"" parameter in a conditional statement, possibly with the logical operators ""&&"" and ""==""."
LLVM,RISCV,2257,"The next statement of the code snippet will likely call the ""selectVSplatSimmHelper"" function, passing in the variables ""N"", ""SplatVal"", ""*CurDAG"", ""*Subtarget"", and an empty array as arguments. It will also pass in a function as an argument that takes in an int64_t variable ""Imm"", performs a logical comparison on it, and returns a boolean value based on the result."
LLVM,RISCV,2258,"</s

Ans: None"
LLVM,RISCV,2259,"The next statement will be the end of the function, with a return statement containing the result of the helper function."
LLVM,RISCV,2260,"The next statement could be:
SplatValue = SplatImm; // Assigning the validated immediate value to a variable for later use."
LLVM,RISCV,2261,"The next statement is likely to be ""SplatImm = SignExtend64(SplatImm, EltVT.getSizeInBits());"""
LLVM,RISCV,2262,"""SplatImm is assigned the signed extended value of the first operand of N if it is of type ConstantSDNode, otherwise the function returns false."""
LLVM,RISCV,2263,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2264,"</s>If ( Args.size() > <NUM_LIT>) {

    throw new IllegalArgumentException(""Too many arguments passed."");"
LLVM,RISCV,2265,Output: End of code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,2266,return VT;
LLVM,RISCV,2267,It is not possible for me to predict the next statement of this code snippet without seeing the rest of the code. Please provide more context or information.
LLVM,RISCV,2268,This code is incomplete and cannot be accurately predicted.
LLVM,RISCV,2269,"</s>

Return RVLocs;"
LLVM,RISCV,2270,"""CCInfo.Execute()"""
LLVM,RISCV,2271,assert(VA.getLocInfo() == CCValAssign::Full);
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,2271,The code will check if the VA (value assignment) is fully allocated and has a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,2272,The next statement would be "return Value;".
LLVM,RISCV,2273,"default:
 return DAG.getNode(ISD::UNDEF, DL, VA.getLocVT());
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2274,"""Remove the current MI instruction from its parent and return the updated BB."""
LLVM,RISCV,2275,"</s>

return emitCALL ( MI , MBB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2276,It will create a new node in the DAG with the specified parameters and return it.
LLVM,RISCV,2277,"SDValue DV = Op . getOperand (0);

""SDValue DV = Op.getOperand(1);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2278,case 'N' :
LLVM,RISCV,2279,else return STR_LIT;
LLVM,RISCV,2280,"""return <INT_LIT>;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2281,Error: missing closing parentheses
LLVM,RISCV,2282,"The next statement is a return statement: return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , & <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2283,There are no more statements to predict.
LLVM,RISCV,2284,"if (ConstantPoolSDNode *N = dyn_cast<ConstantPoolSDNode>(Op)) return DAG.getTargetConstantPool(N->getMachineFunction(), Ty, N->getConstVal(), N->getAlign(), N->getTargetFlags());"
LLVM,RISCV,2285,OPCODE ( RETURN ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2286,"sno

TargetMachine::getAsmTargetFixupKindInfo(.Definition.Expansion)"
LLVM,RISCV,2287,"}

 true"
LLVM,RISCV,2288,"}

if(GA->getAddress ()->getOpcode() == <mips>)_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_)

The next statement would be: return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2289,"if ( ConstantSDNode * C = dyn_cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Op ) ) {
    if ( isInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( C -> getSExtValue ( ) ) ) {
        Ops . push_back ( DAG . getTargetConstant ( C -> getSExtValue ( ) , SDLoc ( Op ) , Op . getValueType ( ) ) ) ;
    }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2290,"The next statement will most likely continue the switch statement and involve the variables PI, PO, PR, PW, SI, SO, SR, and SW."
LLVM,RISCV,2291,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2292,return Result;
LLVM,RISCV,2293,"else Result = DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(CP->getGlobalValue(), PtrVT, CP->getOffset(), 0, 0);"
LLVM,RISCV,2294,"ArgValue = DAG . getNode ( ISD :: <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> , ArgValue ) ; InVals . push_back ( ArgValue ) ; Answer:

Insert another ""if"" statement checking if ""IsN64RA"" is true."
LLVM,RISCV,2295,"SDValue FrameAddr = DAG.getNode(ISD::FRAMEADDR, DL, getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout()), DAG.getIntPtrConstant(FrameIndex, DL));"
LLVM,RISCV,2296,"}

return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, MVT::i64, Op, ConstantSDNode::get(*DAG.getContext(), 1, MVT::i64));"
LLVM,RISCV,2297,It looks like the next statement will use the getAddrPIC function to determine the address of the global variable.
LLVM,RISCV,2298,The next statement will be an if statement checking if the value of "Offset" is null.
LLVM,RISCV,2299,"SDValue Lo = DAG.addNode(<NUM_LIT>, DL, PtrVT, TGALo);"
LLVM,RISCV,2300,The next statement will assign the result of calling the DAG's getTargetJumpTable function with arguments JT->getIndex() and PtrVT to the variable Result.
LLVM,RISCV,2301,"case <STR_LIT> : return lowerExternalSymbol ( cast < ExternalSymbolSDNode > ( Op ) , DAG ) ; case <STR_LIT> : return lowerConstantFP ( cast < ConstantFPSDNode > ( Op ) , DAG ) ; case <STR_LIT> : return lowerConstant ( cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Op ) , DAG ) ; case <STR_LIT> : return lowerShiftImmediate ( Op , DAG ) ;
return lowerFrameIndex(Op, DAG);"
LLVM,RISCV,2302,The next statement of this code snippet is likely another case statement specifying how to handle a specific type of operation or node in the code.
LLVM,RISCV,2303,The next statement would be "SDValue FrameIndex = FunctionArguments[ Arg ].get<NUM_LIT>();"
LLVM,RISCV,2304,"""VT is set to the value returned by invoking the getSimpleValueType() function on Op. RA is assigned the value <STR_LIT> if the Subtarget is RV64, otherwise it is assigned the value <STR_LIT>. The return address for MFI is marked as being taken."""
LLVM,RISCV,2305,It is asserting that the operand at index <NUM_LIT> is equal to <NUM_LIT> and that <STR_LIT> is true.
LLVM,RISCV,2306,"return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, DL, MVT::i32, Cond, DAG.getConstant(1, MVT::i32), DAG.getConstant(0, MVT::i32)) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2307,"</s>

The next statement will likely be ""// TODO: Implement function to lower STACKRESTORE instruction""."
LLVM,RISCV,2308,"..

return DAG.getNode(ISA_LIT::STACKSAVE, SDLoc(Op), MVT::i64, DAG.getRegister(Mips::SP, MVT::i64));"
LLVM,RISCV,2309,"The code snippet returns a copy of the value stored in the register designated by the operand at index NUM_LIT, using the setManipulatesSP method to set the value of sp based on the value of Subtarget.isRV64."
LLVM,RISCV,2310,"The next statement is a return statement, which returns a DAG node that represents a load operation."
LLVM,RISCV,2311,EVT ValVT = Op.getValueType();
LLVM,RISCV,2312,DAG.getValue(FI)
LLVM,RISCV,2313,else if (Ins[i+1].isOrigArg()) ArgTy = FType->getParamType(Ins[i+1].getOrigArgIndex());
LLVM,RISCV,2314,It is possible that the condition in the if statement could evaluate to true.
LLVM,RISCV,2315,"</s>
</s, the value of the next index i+1 will be checked and then updated by incrementing i++>."
LLVM,RISCV,2316,return BAHi; //makes the target block address available for use in the code
LLVM,RISCV,2317,"It is likely that the next statement will involve either assigning or using the SDValue MNLo, either in another operation or in a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2318,"It is likely that the next statement will involve using the SDValues GAHi and GALo in some way, such as passing them as arguments to a function or assigning them to another variable. The exact details will depend on the specific context and purpose of this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2319,return Op.getOperand(0).getZExtValue();
LLVM,RISCV,2320,"Operation cannot be predicted

It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it will depend on the value of Depth and the logic within the while loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2321,The next statement will be "return GAHi;"
LLVM,RISCV,2322,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet, as it depends on the values of variables Op and DAG. It is possible that the next statement could be a default case or another case statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2323,There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,2324,"The next statement will be a return statement calling the getNode() function on the DAG variable, passing in <STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, and RetOps as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,2325,"The code snippet will return a DAG node that performs a copy from the entry node and the value of register Reg, using the XLenVT data type."
LLVM,RISCV,2326,"The next statement will be the closing curly brace, marking the end of the switch case and the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2327,"""Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, LocVT, Val); break;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2328,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Legal ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2329,"Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ValVT, Val);"
LLVM,RISCV,2330,"Val = BuildSDNode ( VA . getOpcode ( ) , SDLoc ( Op ) , LocVT , ValVT ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2331,ABI = MF.getRegInfo().getABI();
LLVM,RISCV,2332,"}


The code snippet is checking to see if the specified arguments follow the calling convention for the target architecture."
LLVM,RISCV,2333,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2334,The next statement will return false if the register value in the if statement is not allocated.
LLVM,RISCV,2335,"The next statement is:

if ( LocVT == <STR_LIT> || LocVT == <STR_LIT> ) {
    unsigned Offset6 = State.AllocateStack(<NUM_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>);
    State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getMem(ValNo, ValVT, Offset6, LocVT, LocInfo));
    return false;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2336,"If the LocVT is not equal to any of the previous values, the statement would return true."
LLVM,RISCV,2337,"case <STR_LIT> : return 1 ; } }

The next statement will be: ""return 0;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2338,"}
""Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, Val);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2339,"case CCValAssign :: Indirect :
This statement could potentially follow the cases of ""Full"" and ""BCvt"", as it could be used to handle a different type of assignment."
LLVM,RISCV,2340,"SDValue NewOp2 = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)->getNextNode());"
LLVM,RISCV,2341,"NewOp2 = DAG.getNode(ADD, DL, ""i32"", N->getOperand(2));"
LLVM,RISCV,2342,"This code snippet builds two machine instructions, one for storing the low register and one for storing the high register to the specified frame index on the stack. It then uses the TargetInstrInfo function loadRegFromStackSlot to load the value from the stack slot into the destination register, before erasing the original machine instruction from the parent."
LLVM,RISCV,2343,The next statement of this code snippet cannot be predicted as it depends on the actual values of the variables and the logic implemented in the methods called.
LLVM,RISCV,2344,"}<end>

Update the BB iterator to point to the next basic block in the function."
LLVM,RISCV,2345,"}else if ( isSelectDync >

The next statement will likely be another if statement checking for a condition involving select dyn a or possibly a break statement ending the loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2346,"MachineBasicBlock *NextBB = BB
->getFallThrough();

return NextBB;"
LLVM,RISCV,2347,"return C_Referring 

There may be more cases included in the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2348,"The next statement could be a default case, a closing bracket to end the switch statement, or another return statement within the function. It is not possible to predict the exact next statement without knowing the rest of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,2349,There is no next statement. This code snippet ends with a curly brace.
LLVM,RISCV,2350,"if (PersonalityFn == nullptr) {
  return <STR_LIT>
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2351,"return <STR_LIT

The next statement would likely be the end of the switch case statement, such as a default case or a closing bracket."
LLVM,RISCV,2352,The code snippet has reached the end and there are no more statements to predict.
LLVM,RISCV,2353,"The next statement could be a ""default"" case, which handles all other possible cases that are not explicitly listed. It could also be the end of the switch statement, closing the curly brackets ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,2354,"""Info.memPtr = PtrTy->getPointer ( );"""
LLVM,RISCV,2355,This code checks if the variable "VT" is equal to <STR_LIT> and if the Subtarget has either the standard extension for single-precision floating-point numbers or double-precision floating-point numbers.
LLVM,RISCV,2356,"The next statement will be:
if (C1Cost < 0) C1Cost = -C1Cost;"
LLVM,RISCV,2357,"} } </s>

Ops.push_back(DAG.getTargetConstant(CVal, SDLoc(Op), Subtarget.getXLenVT()));"
LLVM,RISCV,2358,The for loop will begin to iterate over ArgRegs.
LLVM,RISCV,2359,"Addr = getDynamicTLSAddr(N, DAG);"
LLVM,RISCV,2360,"RetOps . push_back ( DAG . getRegister ( RegHi , <STR_LIT> ) ) ; for ( unsigned i = <NUM_LIT> , e = RVLocs.size(); i < e; ++i) {

The code snippet sets up a SmallVector for RVLocs, creates a CCState object, calls analyzeOutputArgs, and initializes Glue and RetOps. It also sets up a for loop to iterate through RVLocs. The next statement will likely involve retrieving a value from the OutVals vector and assigning it to the SDValue Val, then checking if the CCValAssign is a register"
LLVM,RISCV,2361,"The code is checking for reserved registers and if either RegLo or RegHi are reserved, the MF.getFunction().getContext().diagnose() method is called with the DiagnosticInfoUnsupported argument. Then, the Chain variable is equal to the value returned by DAG.getCopyToReg(). The value of Glue is then set to the value of Chain.getValue(<NUM_LIT>). The next statement will then push the RetOps vector back with the value returned by the DAG.getRegister() method, using RegLo and the <STR_LIT> argument."
LLVM,RISCV,2362,">

The next statement is:

assert (N->getValueType(<NUM_LIT>) == <STR_LIT> && Subtarget.is64Bit() && Subtarget.hasStdExtM() && <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,2363,Val = FIN.getPointer();
LLVM,RISCV,2364,"In the next statement, the code will check the location information of the given value VA. If it is set to CCValAssign::Indirect, the code will return the previously assigned Value Val. Otherwise, the code will call the function convertLocVTToValVT with parameters DAG, Val, VA, and DL."
LLVM,RISCV,2365,"Conditional statement to check if VA's location info is Indirect. If true, it will return ""Val"", otherwise it will return the result of ""convertLocVTToValVT"" function with parameters DAG, Val, VA, and DL."
LLVM,RISCV,2366,"return STI . isO16 ( Reg ) ; } )) {


return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2367,"<ISA_LIT>InvalidCCReservedRegs , ""reserved registers must not be used as arguments"" } ) ;
This code snippet is checking if any of the registers in the variable ""Regs"" are reserved by the user. If any are, it will print an error message using the ""getContext()"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,2368,"State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getMem ( ValNo , ValVT , StackOffset , LocVT , LocInfo ) ) ;

Predicted statement:

State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getPending(ValNo, ValVT, LocVT, LocInfo));"
LLVM,RISCV,2369,"}
This code snippet is defining a function called ""getSubtarget"" that will return the variable ""Subtarget""."
LLVM,RISCV,2370,"There is not enough context provided to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. Depending on how the variable ""Subtarget"" is defined, the next statement could vary greatly."
LLVM,RISCV,2371,"RVFI -> setVarArgsGPRIndex ( RegInfo . createVirtualRegister ( RC ) ) ; RegInfo . addRegOperandToUseList ( MF . getRegInfo ( ) . getVRegDef ( RVFI -> getVarArgsGPRIndex ( ) ) ) ; }
The function will use the register index it creates with the register class to add a stack offset and save size for variable arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,2372,"if (GV == nullptr) {
  report_fatal_error(<STR_LIT>);
} else if (XLenVT == MVT::i32) {
  report_fatal_error(<STR_LIT>);
} else {
  int64_t Addr = GV->getAddress() + Offset;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2373,"RetOps . push_back ( DAG . getRegister ( RegHi , <STR_LIT> ) ) ; }

If VA.getLocVT() and VA.getValVT() are both equal to a certain value, then the code will execute a series of instructions including getting an SDValue, splitting it into two values, and using them to update the chain."
LLVM,RISCV,2374,"There is no code snippet provided, please provide the code snippet for prediction to be possible."
LLVM,RISCV,2375,The code snippet ends with the statement "return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,2376,"The next statement could be another call to the BuildMI function, as the code snippet is currently building instructions for the given MachineFunction and DebugLoc. This statement could be similar to the previous two, adding a register, frame index, immediate value, and memory operand to the instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,2377,int LoIdx = DstRC -> getSubReg < <NUM_LIT> > ( HiReg ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2378,"This code snippet likely belongs to a function that is responsible for loading a value from memory and storing it in two separate registers, LoReg and HiReg. The next statement could be another instruction that uses the values stored in these two registers or a return statement that returns the current basic block (BB) after the operation is complete."
LLVM,RISCV,2379,"The code will access memory at address corresponding to the frame index, Fi, and store the result in register LoReg using the instruction indicated by the string <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2380,"</s>

<s> else return true ;</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,2381,"if ( VT == <STR_LIT> ) return true ; 

}"
LLVM,RISCV,2382,"Switch ( IntNo

case ISD::INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN:


default: return Op;"
LLVM,RISCV,2383,"if (IntNo == <NUM_LIT>) {
  return DAG.getNode(<ISA_LIT>TargetOpcode::G_SRV_INSTRUMENT, SDLoc(Op), Op.getValueType(), Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2384,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, FPConv);"
LLVM,RISCV,2385,assert (N -> getValueType(<NUM_LIT>) == <STR_LIT> && Subtarget.is64Bit() && Subtarget.hasStdExtF() && <STR_LIT>) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2386,"The next statement will be:
if ( Arg . Flags . isByVal ( ) ) return false ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2387,return false
LLVM,RISCV,2388,"if (Offset != 0) return DAG.getNode(""add"", DL, Ty, Addr, DAG.getConstant(Offset, DL, XLenVT));
else return Addr;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2389,"The next statement would likely be another ""setOperationAction"" function call, setting an action for a specific operation and value type."
LLVM,RISCV,2390,"if ( Reg ) {

State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getReg ( ValNo , ValVT , Reg , LocVT , LocInfo ) ) ; return false ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2391,Add a successor to the basic block called LoopMBB.
LLVM,RISCV,2392,"}

BuildMI(*TailMBB, InsertionPoint, DL, TII.get(<STR_LIT>), SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addReg(SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addMBB(TailMBB).addReg(SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addMBB(IfFalseMBB);"
LLVM,RISCV,2393,The next statement is: "if (C1Cost < ShiftedC1Cost) return true; else return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,2394,"if ( ! <NUM_LIT> ) return false ;
The code snippet will likely continue with the declaration of local variables and conditionals that check for certain attribute values."
LLVM,RISCV,2395,The next statement would likely be another "case" statement or the end of the "switch" block.
LLVM,RISCV,2396,"Results . push_back ( FPConv ) ;


<STR_LIT> (this statement is part of the code that will be executed in the ""case <STR_LIT>"" block, specifically in the ""default"" case)"
LLVM,RISCV,2397,The next statement will likely be: "case <STR_LIT> : doSomething(VReg) ; break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2398,"It is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement, checking the value of VA.getLocInfo() and returning the appropriate value based on that condition."
LLVM,RISCV,2399,">


If the statement ""unsigned StackOffset = Reg ? <NUM_LIT> : State . AllocateStack ( XLen / <NUM_LIT> , XLen / <NUM_LIT> ) ;"" is executed, the next statement will be ""if ( ! PendingLocs . empty ( ) ) {""."
LLVM,RISCV,2400,"return false ; }

The function checks if the argument flags are split, and if the pending locations vector or pending argument flags vector is empty."
LLVM,RISCV,2401,MI is a machine instruction and BB is a machine basic block. The next statement creates a new machine basic block called IfFalseMBB under the current machine function F.
LLVM,RISCV,2402,"The next statement is F->insert(I, IfFalseMBB);"
LLVM,RISCV,2403,default: return null;
LLVM,RISCV,2404,"Glue = Chain . getValue ( <NUM_LIT> 42

Another conditional statement checking if the variable ""MemOpChains"" is empty."
LLVM,RISCV,2405,"RegInfo . <ISA_LIT>RegisterLiveIn (<REG_NUM_LIT>) ; OutChains . push_back ( DAG . getCopyFromReg ( Chain , DL , <REG_NUM_LIT> , XLenVT ) ) ; RegInfo . removeLiveIn (<REG_NUM_LIT>) ; }

if (Idx >= ArgRegs.size()) {
  Fi = MFI.CreateFixedObject(XLenInBytes, VaArgOffset, true);
  RVFI->setVarArgsFrameIndex(FI);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2406,"The next statement would be: RetOps.push_back(DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, DL, VA.getLocReg(), VA.getLocVT(), Flag));"
LLVM,RISCV,2407,"if (VA.isRegLoc()) { 
    flag = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, DL, VA.getLocReg(), Val, Flag); 
    RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(VA.getLocReg(), VA.getValVT())); 
} else if (VA.isMemLoc()) { 
    // Store the value to the stack 
    SDValue PtrOff = DAG.getConstant(VA.getLocMemOffset(), DL, PtrVT); 
    PtrOff = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, PtrVT, PtrOff, Ptr); 
    Flag = DAG.getStore(Chain,"
LLVM,RISCV,2408,The next statement could be another setOperationAction statement with different arguments or a call to another function within the code.
LLVM,RISCV,2409,Default case: // Do something with Val here.
LLVM,RISCV,2410,Value *Arg = Ins[i].lo
LLVM,RISCV,2411,Skip to the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2412,"}

<br>The value of i and the EVT string of ArgVT will be printed. The program will then terminate with a null pointer error."
LLVM,RISCV,2413,This code snippet iterates through the outputs of a function call and checks the control flow of the program. The next statement would likely be a conditional statement that checks if the control flow matches a specific set of conditions.
LLVM,RISCV,2414,"}

1. Loop through each element of the Outs vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2415,"If ValVT is not a fixed length vector and is a scalar integer, LocVT is set to XLenVT and LocInfo is set to CCValAssign::Indirect. PendingLocs and PendingArgFlags are then pushed with new CCValAssign and ArgFlags objects telling them to use the pending location. The function then checks if the split has ended, if it has not, then the function will return false. If the split has ended and the size of PendingLocs is less than or equal to <NUM_LIT>, the function will assert that the size of PendingLocs is <NUM_LIT>, and if"
LLVM,RISCV,2416,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement, potentially providing the number of registers required for a specific calling convention and data type."
LLVM,RISCV,2417,"return TargetLowering :: getRegisterTypeForCallingConv ( Context , CC , VT ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2418,"</s>

It is likely that the code will return a default register type if the conditions for the first return statement are not met."
LLVM,RISCV,2419,"} else {
	return VT;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2420,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be an if statement, where ""Subtarget.hasStdExtZbb()"" and ""!isa<ConstantSDNode>(Y)"" are used as conditions."
LLVM,RISCV,2421,"</s>
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2422,"</s>

if (ScalarTy->isDoubleTy())
    return Subtarget.hasVInstructionsF64();"
LLVM,RISCV,2423,The next statement would most likely be "if (ScalarTy -> isDoubleTy()) return Subtarget.hasVInstructionsF64();".
LLVM,RISCV,2424,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, DAG.getConstant(Adjust, DL, VT), Trunc);"
LLVM,RISCV,2425,"SDValue Neg = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VT , DAG . getConstant ( <NUM_LIT> , DL , VT ) , Src ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2426,"The next statement is:

SDValue TableNode = DAG.getConstant(Table, DL, XLenVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2427,"The next statement could be something like ""SDValue MADD = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VTs, RM, Chain);"" as the code snippet appears to be setting up operands and creating a new node."
LLVM,RISCV,2428,"Next, the code snippet will push the value of VT onto the Ops variable."
LLVM,RISCV,2429,"The next statement would likely be:

SDValue And = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, XLenVT, SysRegNo, Shift);"
LLVM,RISCV,2430,"SDValue RMValue = Op -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; SDValue SysRegNo = DAG . getTargetConstant ( <STR_LIT> ( <STR_LIT> ) -> Encoding , DL , XLenVT ) ; static const unsigned Table = ( <STR_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> * int ( RoundingMode :: NearestTiesToEven ) ) | ( <STR_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> * int ( RoundingMode :: TowardZero ) ) | ( <STR_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> * int ( RoundingMode"
LLVM,RISCV,2431,"if the ScalarOp is not a scalar integer or is equal to XLenVT, then return an empty SDValue."
LLVM,RISCV,2432,Ops.push_back(&Op->getOperandUse(<NUM_LIT>)
LLVM,RISCV,2433,The code will return an expression representing the quotient and remainder of dividing C1 by C0.
LLVM,RISCV,2434,if ( LMul > Subtarget . getMaxLMULForFixedLengthVectors ( ) ) return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,2435,The next statement could potentially be either another case statement checking for a specific instruction type (i.e. case <STR_LIT>:) or a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2436,"RetOps . push_back ( DAG . getRegister ( RegHi , <STR_LIT> ) ) ; }

The next statement would be: ""i++;"" to iterate through the RVLocs vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2437,if ( RC == & <STR_LIT> ) return State . AllocateReg ( ArgVRM2s ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2438,Optional<unsigned> SecondMaskArgument;
LLVM,RISCV,2439,The next statement will perform some operation on the function Fn using the variables passed as parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,2440,"The next statement will be a conditional statement beginning with ""if"" that calls the function ""Fn"" and passes in the arguments ""MF.getDataLayout()"", ""ABI"", ""i"", ""ArgVT"", ""ArgVT"", ""CCValAssign::Full"", ""ArgFlags"", ""CCInfo"", ""Outs[i].IsFixed"", ""IsRet"", ""OrigTy"", ""*this"", and ""FirstMaskArgument""."
LLVM,RISCV,2441,"In this code snippet, the next statement would likely be a conditional that returns false if the CC_<ISA_LIT> function returns an error code."
LLVM,RISCV,2442,"}

This snippet initializes a new CCState object and declares an optional unsigned integer variable. If the Subtarget has a specific attribute, the variable is assigned a value based on a function called ""preAssignMask"". Next, a for loop is initiated, setting up a counter variable ""i"" to an unknown integer value and a limit ""e"" to the size of the ""Outs"" variable. The loop executes code block with each iteration, starting from the unknown value of ""i"" and terminating when ""i"" is equal to ""e"" minus one. Inside the block, a new variable ""VT"" is declared and set"
LLVM,RISCV,2443,"} elif
 ( ValVT.isVector() ) {Reg = allocateRVVReg(ValVT,ValNo,FirstMaskArgument, State, TLI);}"
LLVM,RISCV,2444,"The next statement would likely be a closing ""}"" to end the if statement, as it looks like the code block is determining where the value should be assigned (to a register or to a stack)."
LLVM,RISCV,2445,"} }

if ( LocVT == <STR_LIT> ) { static const MCPhysReg FPR128List [ ] = { <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,2446,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2447,"} }
if ( LocVT == <STR_LIT> ) {
  static const MCPhysReg GPR32List [ ] = { <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> } ; if ( unsigned Reg = State . AllocateReg ( GPR32List ) ) { State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getReg ( ValNo , ValVT , Reg , LocVT , LocInfo ) ) ; return false ; } }"
LLVM,RISCV,2448,The next statement in this code snippet would be to return the DAG node with the appropriate values for the operands and the combined shift amount.
LLVM,RISCV,2449,">

SDValue()"
LLVM,RISCV,2450,"Mask = <STR_LIT> ( EltBits ) ; }

return SDValue();"
LLVM,RISCV,2451,"Op0 = DAG.getNode(ExtOpc, DL, VT, Op0, Op1);"
LLVM,RISCV,2452,"return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VT , LHS -> Op , RHS -> Op ) ; }


SDValue Op2 = Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,2453,"auto Imm = CurDAG -> Constant ( <NUM_LIT> <

> matchGREVIPat ( Op . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) && LHS->formsPairWith ( * RHS ) ) { SDLoc DL ( Op ) ; auto Imm = CurDAG -> Constant ( <NEW_NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2454,"}</s>


SDValue SelectedOp;"
LLVM,RISCV,2455,"N

SDValue N2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, SDLoc(N), N->getValueType(0), N0, N1); // creates an XOR node with N0 and N1 as operands"
LLVM,RISCV,2456,return Result;
LLVM,RISCV,2457,if ( ShAmt & <NUM_LIT> ) x = ( ( x & <NUM_LIT> ) << <NUM_LIT> ) | ( ( x & <NUM_LIT> ) >> <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2458,"Another if statement will be executed, continuing the pattern of the previous three if statements."
LLVM,RISCV,2459,"Known . Zero . reverseBits ( ) ; Known . One . reverseBits ( ) ; }

case <STR_LIT> : { KnownBits Known = DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), DemandedElts, Depth + <NUM_LIT>); Known = Known.One.reverseBits(); Known = Known.Abs(-1); Known = Known.sext(BitWidth); break; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2460,"""return Subtarget.getXLen() - Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getScalarValueSizeInBits() + <NUM_LIT>;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2461,"This snippet of code is checking two conditions. The first condition checks if the specified vector is a fixed-length vector. The next statement will likely check the second condition, which is whether the value type of the vector is a scalable vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2462,"The next statement is ""Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VA.getValVT(), Val);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2463,The code will return the boolean value "true".
LLVM,RISCV,2464,`}`
LLVM,RISCV,2465,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, DAG.getUNDEF(VT), V, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,2466,assert (V.getValueType().getNumElements() == VT.getNumElements() && <STR_LIT>) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2467,"{
 ""case: CCValAssign::Indirect: Val = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, LocVT, Val);
"""">
break;"
LLVM,RISCV,2468,The code will return a SDValue node created from the specified parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,2469,"The next statement will most likely be another SDValue variable being declared, potentially for the result of the expression being calculated with the NewRes variable."
LLVM,RISCV,2470,NewWOp.setDebugLoc(DL);
LLVM,RISCV,2471,SDNode *NewNode = dyn_cast<SDNode*>(NewWOp);
LLVM,RISCV,2472,The next statement could be a closing bracket or another "if" statement checking for a specific condition before returning a true or false value.
LLVM,RISCV,2473,"The next statement could be a closing bracket for the inner if statement, since there is an extra closing bracket at the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2474,VecRegClassID = getRegClassIDForVecVT (VecVT)
LLVM,RISCV,2475,"""The function will return a pair of unsigned integers representing the decomposed subregs of the subvector insert/extract. It will use the passed in MVTs, InsertExtractIdx, and RegisterInfo from the target. A static assert statement will check that the MVTs are of the appropriate size before continuing."""
LLVM,RISCV,2476,">


This code snippet is setting up memory operands for storing the value in LoReg and HiReg in the designated memory location pointed to by FI."
LLVM,RISCV,2477,"""If neither of the previous if statements are true, return nullptr."""
LLVM,RISCV,2478,"Value * Result = Builder . CreateCall ( MaskedCmpXchg , { AlignedAddr , CmpVal , NewVal , Mask , Ordering } ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2479,"""Value * Ordering = Builder.getIntN(XLen, stat
ic_cast <uint64_t>(Ord)) ; <STR_LIT> CmpXchgIntrID = <STR_LIT> ; if (XLen == <NUM_LIT>) {
CmpVal = Builder.CreateSExt(CmpVal, Builder.getInt64Ty());
NewVal = Builder.CreateSExt(NewVal, Builder.getInt64Ty());
Mask = Builder.CreateSExt(Mask, Builder.getInt64Ty());
CmpXchgIntrID = <STR_LIT>;
} Type *Tys[] = {AlignedAddr->getType()};
Value *C"
LLVM,RISCV,2480,"BuildMI ( DoneMBB , DL , TII -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) , ReadAgainReg ) . addImm ( <STR_LIT> ( <STR_LIT> ) -> Encoding ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2481,RegInfo.addLiveIn(ReadAgainReg);
LLVM,RISCV,2482,"TailMBB -> insert ( InsertionPoint , SelectMBBI -> removeFromParent ( ) ) ;

TailMBB->insert(InsertionPoint, SelectMBBI->removeFromParent()); break;"
LLVM,RISCV,2483,This code snippet predicts and builds two machine instructions based on the machine frame index and offset information provided. The next statement will most likely involve adding a memory operand and erasing the previous machine instruction.
LLVM,RISCV,2484,"TII.loadRegFromStackSlot(MBB, II, LoReg, FI, SrcRC, RI);"
LLVM,RISCV,2485,The next statement could be to return a nullptr if the conditions are not met.
LLVM,RISCV,2486,"Vanity not found.

""return Vanity not found."""
LLVM,RISCV,2487,"return DAG.getBitcast(VT, L);"
LLVM,RISCV,2488,The statement would be to check if the value of 'L' is valid and perform necessary actions if it is.
LLVM,RISCV,2489,"""StoredVal = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, NewVT, StoredVal);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2490,"}

The next statement will be executing the code within the ""medium"" case of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2491,"The code will return the type of the constraint based on the input value, either C_Immediate, C_Memory, or C_Other."
LLVM,RISCV,2492,"VecVT is a scalable vector and getDefaultVLOps function will be called with parameters VecVT, VecVT, DL, DAG, and Subtarget."
LLVM,RISCV,2493,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a return statement that calls the getDefaultVLOps function, passing in the VecVT, VecVT, DL, DAG, and Subtarget variables as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,2494,"The next statement could be:
MVT DoubleXLen = Subtarget.getDoubleXLenVT();"
LLVM,RISCV,2495,TargetLowering::CLI.AnalyzeCallResult();
LLVM,RISCV,2496,"This code snippet adds a new entry to the argument list, consisting of a node and a type."
LLVM,RISCV,2497,The next statement is likely another method that is used to obtain the exception pointer register.
LLVM,RISCV,2498,<STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,2499,"return TargetLower

>

The next statement in this code snippet is a closing brace (""}"") indicating the end of the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,2500,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2501,"The next statement will be a return statement, likely returning a value calculated by the getExtendForAtomicOps function."
LLVM,RISCV,2502,"The next statement is likely to be a code block containing a return statement or another function/method declaration, as it appears to be part of a larger code block."
LLVM,RISCV,2503,"case <NUM_LIT> : <s>

Explanation: The next statement will depend on the value of the switch case condition <NUM_LIT>, but it will most likely be a break statement or another case statement followed by a break. This is assuming there are multiple cases within the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2504,"return <STR_LIT> :: LMUL_8 ; }
The next statement is to compare the value of the variable KnownSize using a switch statement and return the corresponding <STR_LIT> based on its value."
LLVM,RISCV,2505,<STR_LIT> must be a Boolean expression evaluating to true or false.
LLVM,RISCV,2506,The next statement could be the opening curly brace for the function body.
LLVM,RISCV,2507,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely a closing bracket or a return statement, since the previous lines of code are using the ""return <STR_LIT>"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2508,return <REG_CLS_ID>;
LLVM,RISCV,2509,The next statement will be to return a <STR_LIT> if the getVectorElementType is equal to <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,2510,"if ( Reg == <STR_LIT> ) {
  Reg = MatchRegisterName ( RegName ) ;
  if ( Reg == <STR_LIT> ) {
    report_fatal_error ( Twine ( <STR_LIT> + StringRef ( RegName ) + <STR_LIT> ) ) ;
  }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2511,"It appears that the statement after the if statement checks if the register is not reserved and is not reserved by the user. If this is the case, it will likely print an error message using the report_fatal_error function and then return the register."
LLVM,RISCV,2512,"// If CC is not equal to CallingConv::C then return EVT, otherwise return MVT::i64 
The next statement could be an if-else statement with CC being compared to CallingConv::C and the return statements being EVT or MVT::i64 depending on the result. Alternatively, it could be a switch statement with different cases for different values of CC and the corresponding return statements."
LLVM,RISCV,2513,"return MVT :: <STR_LIT> ; }</s>


The next statement will likely be ""return MVT::<STR_LIT>;"" as the if statement condition was not met."
LLVM,RISCV,2514,"return DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, MVT::i1, DAG.getConstant(ISD::SETLE, DL, MVT::i32), Mask, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2515,"}

<s> return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2516,else return VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();
LLVM,RISCV,2517,"SDValue MNAdd = SDValue (DAG.getMachineNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, AddrAdd), <NUM_LIT>) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2518,"SDValue MNAdd = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, AddrAdd), <NUM_LIT>);
SDValue MNLo = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, AddrLo), <NUM_LIT>);
return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, MNHi, MNAdd, MNLo, TPReg);"
LLVM,RISCV,2519,"return <STR_LIT> ; }
return Index / LMUL;"
LLVM,RISCV,2520,"</s>

<s>return DAG.getTargetJumpTable(N, Ty, Flags);</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,2521,The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be "return true".
LLVM,RISCV,2522,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context. It depends on the code and variables involved.
LLVM,RISCV,2523,"</s>

The next statement is to return a boolean value, checking if the input VT is equal to <STR_LIT> and if the Subtarget has the required standard extension (either hasStdExtZfh, hasStdExtF, or hasStdExtD)."
LLVM,RISCV,2524,"</s><e>

A common optimization in the LLVM compiler is to use the count leading zeroes instruction,
when possible, because it can be implemented more efficiently on certain hardware architectures."
LLVM,RISCV,2525,"It is likely expected that the next statement will return the value of the Subtarget method, indicating whether or not the system has the specified standard extension."
LLVM,RISCV,2526,This code snippet has reached its end.
LLVM,RISCV,2527,"The code will check the minimum number of signed bits needed to represent ShiftedC1Int and compare it to the minimum number of signed bits needed to represent C1Int. If the cost of C1Int is less than ShiftedC1Int, the function will return false. Otherwise, it will return true."
LLVM,RISCV,2528,"}

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,2529,"Check whether the callee is returning a struct, and if so, return false. Then, check if the callee is a global address, and if it has external weak linkage, return false. Next, obtain the register info for the specified subtarget of the callee, and check which registers are preserved for the current function. If the calling convention for the callee is different from the caller, check which registers are preserved for the callee and make sure they are a subset of the ones preserved for the caller. If not, return false."
LLVM,RISCV,2530,Call the getCallPreservedMask function from the TRI variable using the MF and CalleeCC variables as parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,2531,<STR_LIT> : return Subtarget . hasStdExtDx ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2532,if ( VT == <STR_LIT> && ! Subtarget . hasStdExtD ( ) ) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2533,if ( ScalarTy -> isStructTy ( ) ) return Subtarget . hasStdExtU ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2534,"The next statement would likely be:

if (C1.isSignedIntN(<NUM_LIT>) && (!C1 * C2).isSignedIntN(<NUM_LIT>))
    return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,2535,else return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2536,"// Noinfo

There is not enough information to predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2537,"if (SeqAddend == Addend) { // do something
} else if (SeqAddend != Addend) {
return None ;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2538,"}</s>

There will be a conditional statement that checks if the PartVTBitSize is divisible by ValueVTBitSize and if so, it will create a SameEltTypeVT variable, set it to a vector type with the same element type as PartEltVT, and return Val."
LLVM,RISCV,2539,"The next statement will be to return the converted value from the scalable vector variables VT, Max, DAG, and Subtarget."
LLVM,RISCV,2540,The next statement would likely involve using the newly created SDValue objects to perform some sort of computation or operation.
LLVM,RISCV,2541,"std::cout << N->getAddressSpace() << std::endl;

Output:

The output will print the address space of the BlockAddressSDNode object N."
LLVM,RISCV,2542,N->getBlock();
LLVM,RISCV,2543,"return getConstantPoolEntry ( N -> getConstValu

<e> e </e>"
LLVM,RISCV,2544,">

Op


return DAG . getBitcast ( Op . getValueType ( ) , Slidedown ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2545,"}

The next statement will be: 
SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, EVT, Vec, Idx);"
LLVM,RISCV,2546,"The next statement is return convertFromScalableVector(ExtVT, Ext, DAG, Subtarget);"
LLVM,RISCV,2547,"return scalarizeVectorOp(Op, DL, ExtVT, ContainerVT, Op1);"
LLVM,RISCV,2548,"""Instantiate a container for the fixed length vector type VT, and convert the operands Mag and Sign to scalable vectors with the given container type."""
LLVM,RISCV,2549,"return Result ;

""The function returns Result."""
LLVM,RISCV,2550,"else if ( VT . getVectorElementType ( ) == <I32> ) return lowerToScalableOp ( Op , DAG , MaskOpc , true ) ;


The next statement will use the else if condition to return a different result based on the vector element type being equal to <I32>."
LLVM,RISCV,2551,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ContainerVT, Select, Mask);"
LLVM,RISCV,2552,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, Op1, Op2);"
LLVM,RISCV,2553,The next statement will likely involve using the variables "Mask" and "Cmp" to perform some sort of operation or computation.
LLVM,RISCV,2554,"} return DAG.getNode(Opc, SDLoc(Op), MVT::vbool, Op.getOperand(0), Op.getOperand(1));}


The next statement is ""return DAG.getNode(Opc, SDLoc(Op), MVT::vbool, Op.getOperand(0), Op.getOperand(1));"""
LLVM,RISCV,2555,None
LLVM,RISCV,2556,"else {
  VT = NodeTy . <STR_LIT>;
  StoreVal = <STR_LIT> . getNode ( <STR_LIT>, DL, VT, StoreVal, DAG . getIntPtrConstant (<NUM_LIT>, DL));
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2557,"PartOffset += Offset ; SDValue ArgPartValue ; if ( PartVA . isRegLoc ( ) ) ArgPartValue = unpackFromRegLoc ( DAG , Chain , PartVA , DL , * this ) ; else ArgPartValue = unpackFromMemLoc ( DAG , Chain , PartVA , DL , PartOffset ) ; ArgValue = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VA . getValVT ( ) , ArgValue , ArgPartValue ) ; ++ i ; } }
The next statement is: InVals.push_back(DAG.getLoad(VA.getValVT(), DL, Chain, Arg"
LLVM,RISCV,2558,"SDValue M1ScalableVal = DAG.getSplatVector(M1VT, DL, VectorVal)"
LLVM,RISCV,2559,SDNode *FpToInt = cast<SDNode>(FpToInt) ? FpToInt : ZeroInt;
LLVM,RISCV,2560,"""Create a Register variable 'FrameReg' assigned to the frame register of the MachineFunction, calculate the integer value 'XLenInBytes' by dividing the getXLen value from the Subtarget by <num_lit>, create an EVT variable 'VT' assigned to Op's value type, and create a SDLoc variable 'DL' assigned to Op."""
LLVM,RISCV,2561,"static const SDValue Mask = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, MVT::i32, Shift, DAG.getConstant(<NUM_LIT> - <NUM_LIT>, DL, MVT::i32));"
LLVM,RISCV,2562,"<STR_LIT> , DL , XLenVT , Masked , Chain"
LLVM,RISCV,2563,"if (Offset == <NUM_LIT>) {
    return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, Addr, DAG.getConstant(Offset, DL, XLenVT));
} else {
    return null;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2564,"}

if (isFloatingPoint) {
  Vec = Node(0); // <NUM_LIT> is replaced with 0
} else {
  ValInVec = Node(ContainerVT, DAG.getUNDEF(ContainerVT), Val, VL);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2565,"If the IsUnmasked variable is false, the Ops vector will also include the Mask value."
LLVM,RISCV,2566,"The code will check if the value of Scalar is less than or equal to XLenVT. If so, it will break from the loop. Otherwise, it will create a new MVT, I32VT, and use DAG to perform a bitcast on the Scalar value. It will also create two new SDValues, ScalarLo and ScalarHi, using the getNode method."
LLVM,RISCV,2567,"return lowerVectorIntrinsicSplats(Op, DAG, Subtarget);"
LLVM,RISCV,2568,"return DAG.getMergeValues({Result, Chain}, DL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2569,"return getJumpTableAddr(N, DAG);"
LLVM,RISCV,2570,"The next statement will likely involve some operation or manipulation using the JumpTableSDNode variable N, possibly followed by a return statement or assignment."
LLVM,RISCV,2571,"Predicting next lines of code is not possible as it can vary based on the context and definitions of the variables used in the code snippet. However, based on the existing pattern, the next lines of code may involve some conditional statements and further conversions or operations on the variables."
LLVM,RISCV,2572,if ( VT .isFixedLengthVector ( ) ) { SDValue Src1 = <Some value>; SDValue Src2 = <Some value>; }
LLVM,RISCV,2573,The next statement is "assert(! IsTruncatingStore && <STR_LIT>) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2574,"Mask =

assert ( Mask . getValueType ( ) == MaskVT && <STR_LIT> ) ;

assert ( VT == ContainerVT && <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2575,It is unable to predict with the given information.
LLVM,RISCV,2576,unsigned MaskID = IsUnmasked ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,2577,"The next statement will check if the function has a certain attribute and if not, it will report an error."
LLVM,RISCV,2578,"{

return SDValue(
    DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, XLenVT, DAG.getConstant(XLenInBytes, DL, XLenVT), //THIS IS CORRECT, the statement is using the DAG method getNode to create an ADD node with the operands DL, XLenVT, and a constant value XLenBytes."
LLVM,RISCV,2579,"The next statement will be an assert statement with conditions about the values of XLenVT, Scalar, and <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2580,"if (VT == XLenVT && CondV.getOpcode() == G_FCMP && CondV.getOperand(1).getSimpleValueType() == XLenVT) {
SDValue LHS = CondV.getOperand(1);
SDValue RHS = CondV.getOperand(2);
const auto *CC = cast<CondCodeSDNode>(CondV.getOperand(3));
CondCodeSDNode::CCVal CCVal = CC->get();
if (isa<ConstantSDNode>(FalseV) && CCVal == CondCodeSDNode::CC_NE) {
return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, DL, Op.getValue"
LLVM,RISCV,2581,"The next statement could be a conditional statement, checking if the value of Zero is not equal to the SetNE value, using the getNode function."
LLVM,RISCV,2582,"SDValue MVValue = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, XLenVT, RMValue, Op);"
LLVM,RISCV,2583,"The next statement would be ""SDValue Offset = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, XLenVT, RMValue, DAG.getConstant(<NUM_LIT>, DL, XLenVT));"""
LLVM,RISCV,2584,"Hi = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, CC, HiTrue, HiFalse)"
LLVM,RISCV,2585,"SDValue XLenMinus2 = DAG . getConstant ( Subtarget . getXLen ( ) - 2 , DL , VT ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2586,The next statement will likely involve the merging of the values in the "Parts" array and returning the result using the DAG.getMergeValues() function.
LLVM,RISCV,2587,"CC = DAG.getSetCC(DL, VT, MinusXLen, ShiftRightLo, HiTrue) ; Parts[2] = {CC, Lo} ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2588,"</s>

SDValue Vec = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, VT, Op, Mask, VL)"
LLVM,RISCV,2589,The next statement could be to close the code block with a closing curly brace.
LLVM,RISCV,2590,"""SDValue ScalableVL = DAG.getNode(ScalableOpc, DL, VT, Ops, Mask, VL);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2591,"The next statement would be:

return ScalableRes;"
LLVM,RISCV,2592,Continue to check for splitting and merging vector elements until the vector is legal.
LLVM,RISCV,2593,The code snippet is performing operations on operands of a node.
LLVM,RISCV,2594,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VecVT, Src, SplatTrueVal, SplatZero, CC, Mask, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2595,"}

The next statement is likely to be another if statement checking for a different condition."
LLVM,RISCV,2596,"The next statement would most likely be something that utilizes the variables/objects created in the if statements, such as:
Op.getNode().getValueType()"
LLVM,RISCV,2597,"Nothing, the code snippet has reached the end."
LLVM,RISCV,2598,"SplatOne = DAG.getNode( ""trunc"", DL, VecVT, Src, SplatOne) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2599,"""

Vec = DAG . getNode ( ""ADD"" , DL , XLenVT , Zero , Vec , TrueMask , VL ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2600,"""The value V will be added to the Ops vector after being converted to a scalable vector of type ContainerVT, using the convertToScalableVector function."""
LLVM,RISCV,2601,The next statement is a conditional statement checking if VT is a fixed length vector.
LLVM,RISCV,2602,"}</s>

The next statement is:

if (ContainerVT.getSizeInBits() != 64) { ContainerVT = MVT::i64; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2603,"The next statement would be to close the curly braces and end the function with a semicolon, followed by returning the result of the match function, using the op and bitmanipmasks variables as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,2604,"} ELSE if ( Src . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> )

return None;"
LLVM,RISCV,2605,"The next statement is: SDValue MaskedOp = DAG.getNode(ShlExpMask ? ISD::SHL : ISD::SRL, DL, VT, Src, DAG.getConstant(ShAmt, DL, WidthVT));"
LLVM,RISCV,2606,"2</s>
{ 
2<ISA_LIT>BitmanipPat>} 


return Op;"
LLVM,RISCV,2607,return None;
LLVM,RISCV,2608,"Based on the previous statement, the next statement could be ""if CI is tail call, then continue with next function call."""
LLVM,RISCV,2609,Conditional statement checking if the Subtarget uses RVV for fixed length vectors or if VT is a fixed length vector with element type <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,2610,It is likely that the next statement will be "else return nullptr;" or something similar.
LLVM,RISCV,2611,"if ( SDValue V = transformAddShlImm ( N , DAG, Subtarget ) ) return combineSelectAndUseCommutative ( N , DAG , false );"
LLVM,RISCV,2612,"The code will return the result of combining the select and use commutative operations with the given parameters, and the output will be returned."
LLVM,RISCV,2613,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a return statement that returns the result of the function combineSelectAndUseCommutative."
LLVM,RISCV,2614,"The code is checking if the Subtarget is not 64-bit, and if it is, it is returning a value from SDValue. If not, it is setting some values, including a SmallVector. It is then checking the uses of a particular SDNode, and if it is not empty, it is returning a SDValue."
LLVM,RISCV,2615,"If the value returned from the function call ""combineORToGREV"" is not equal to nullptr, then the value of GREV will be returned."
LLVM,RISCV,2616,"The code will check if the subtarget has standard extension Zbp, and if so, it will try to combine OR operation to GREV, GORC, or SHFL."
LLVM,RISCV,2617,nil
LLVM,RISCV,2618,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The next statement could be any number of possibilities, depending on the specific functions and variables being used in the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2619,We cannot make a prediction without knowing the contents of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,2620,"if there is a vector in the arguments and its element type is <STR_LIT>, the function will return the index of that argument."
LLVM,RISCV,2621,"Assuming there are no syntax errors, the next statement would likely be:

}"
LLVM,RISCV,2622,"My apologies, I am an AI model and do not have access to the code snippet you have provided. Can you please provide the full code or more context for me to predict the next statement accurately?"
LLVM,RISCV,2623,"}

true"
LLVM,RISCV,2624,"}

Expected statement: The function shouldExpandBuildVectorWithShuffles() returns a boolean value of false."
LLVM,RISCV,2625,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional information about the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,2626,"</s>



The next statement is not available due to insufficient code context."
LLVM,RISCV,2627,"</s>

The next statement will check if the Subtarget is 64-bit and if the EVT Type is equal to <STR_LIT>, and will return true if both conditions are met. If not, it will return the value of IsSigned."
LLVM,RISCV,2628,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2629,"if ( Is </s>

Sinker (Insn, U.getIndex()))) {
    Ops.push_back(&U);
  }
  if (!Ops.empty()) {
    return true;
  }
  Ops.clear();
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2630,"}
else { return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, Lo, Hi, VL); }"
LLVM,RISCV,2631,"The next statement will most likely be either a closing curly brace or a continuation of the if statement, depending on what the <NUM_LIT> and <STR_LIT> represent."
LLVM,RISCV,2632,"Hi = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> , Scalar , DAG . getConstant ( <NUM_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2633,"Return false;
""The code checks if the value and part are both scalable vectors. If so, it creates a context and gets the element types and bit sizes of both vectors. It then checks if the part's bit size is a multiple of the value's bit size. If it is, and the element types are not equal, it sets the count to be the value's bit size divided by the part's element type size and returns false."""
LLVM,RISCV,2634,"if ( ISD :: isNormalShl ( Op . <Already visited> ) == <NUM_LIT> ) return false 

Return false."
LLVM,RISCV,2635,if ( NewMask == ExpandedMask) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2636,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, New1, DAG.getConstant(C1, DL, VT));"
LLVM,RISCV,2637,"The next statement is: 

SDValue result_node = DAG.getNode(<NUM_LIT>, DL, VT, NA1, DAG.getConstant(<NUM_LIT>, DL, VT));"
LLVM,RISCV,2638,"The next statement could potentially be another case statement for the ""switch"" statement, a statement to swap the values of LHS and RHS, or a break statement to exit the ""switch"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2639,Hi = DAG . getLoad
LLVM,RISCV,2640,"This is not a valid code snippet, so there is no next statement to predict."
LLVM,RISCV,2641,"""if (LocVT.isSimple()) { Val = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_ELEMENT, DL, VA.getValVT(), VA.getLocReg()); } else { Val = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, DL, VA.getLocReg(), VA.getLocVT()); }"""
LLVM,RISCV,2642,"return !Subtarget . useRVV ();

Subtarget doesn't use RVV, so the return value will be true."
LLVM,RISCV,2643,The return statement will return the useRVVForFixedLengthVectorVT function using the VT and Subtarget parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,2644,"} the next statement could potentially be an <ISA_LIT>instrinsic call, where the intrinsic is used to extract information about the reserved registers based on the input from this code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2645,"} ) )

The next statement would be the closing curly brace for the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2646,if (Idx == 0) continue;
LLVM,RISCV,2647,"Created . push_back ( Add . getNode ( ) ) ; Created . push_back ( Sel . getNode ( ) )

SDValue Result = Sel;"
LLVM,RISCV,2648,return SDValue();
LLVM,RISCV,2649,"SDValue (MASK_OP, DL, Op1, Op0)"
LLVM,RISCV,2650,The next statement is a case statement with the case being "<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,2651,The next statement could be a closing curly bracket or an "else" statement following the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2652,"The next statement will be to execute the DAG getNode function, passing in the arguments WOpcode, DL, <STR_LIT>, NewOp1, and NewOp2."
LLVM,RISCV,2653,"<STR_LIT>


return emitQuietFCMP ( MI , BB , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Subtarget );"
LLVM,RISCV,2654,"BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII.get(<STR_LIT>));"
LLVM,RISCV,2655,"return X86ISD :: RJUMP32 ; } return tok :: JumpTable ; }



The next statement is ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,2656,"return <STR_LIT> ; case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ; break; } </s>

The next statement will either be a ""return"" statement with <STR_LIT> as the return value or a ""break"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2657,The next statement would be: "break;"
LLVM,RISCV,2658,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2659,"It is difficult to accurately predict the next statement without further context and knowledge of the variables and functions used in this code snippet. However, based on the information provided, the next statement could possibly be an assignment or a conditional statement based on the result of the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2660,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2661,"return isOperationLegal ( < > , VT ) ; </s>

It will return whether the given floating-point immediate is legal for the specified target and whether it can be used for code size optimization."
LLVM,RISCV,2662,"</s>

This code snippet does not have a next statement. It ends with a return statement, indicating that the function has completed."
LLVM,RISCV,2663,if ( Elt == i / <NUM_LIT> ) return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,2664,"EVT MemVT = LD - > getMemoryVT ( ) ; if ( LD - > getUnsigned <o> <s>

} else { return false; }"
LLVM,RISCV,2665,"The next statement will be:

return Val;"
LLVM,RISCV,2666,"}</s>

The next statement would return an expression created from the symbol of the given basic block along with the given context."
LLVM,RISCV,2667,The code will likely return an expression created from the symbol of MBB and Ctx.
LLVM,RISCV,2668,The next statement would be: MVT VecVT = Vec.getSimpleValueType();
LLVM,RISCV,2669,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(RVVOpcode, DL, VecEltVT, VectorVal, Mask, VL, ScalarSplat);"
LLVM,RISCV,2670,">>MVT


Scalar VT Mask = VL = VectorVal;"
LLVM,RISCV,2671,The next statement is "return FpToInt;".
LLVM,RISCV,2672,"MaxValNode = DAG . getMaxVal ( VT , DL , Precision ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2673,It is most likely a function being returned or another case being checked.
LLVM,RISCV,2674,Ops.push_back(Load->getBasePtr());
LLVM,RISCV,2675,"}

A new case will be added to the switch, labeled with ""Op.Load *""."
LLVM,RISCV,2676,"The next statement is: DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, DL, MVT::v2f32, Op1, Op2)"
LLVM,RISCV,2677,"The next statement is likely to be:

return DAG.getSelect(DL, VT, Val, ContainerVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2678,"The next statement is a conditional statement, with the condition being ""if (VT.isFixedLengthVector())""."
LLVM,RISCV,2679,Create a condition to check if VT is a fixed length vector.
LLVM,RISCV,2680,"The next statement would be:
SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::GATHER, DL, VT, Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2681,"The next statement will check whether the Const variable is equal to null or not, or if it is an integer with a specific value. If any of these conditions are not true, the code will return a DAG node with an undefined value. Otherwise, it will return a DAG node with the value of the Scalar variable and VL."
LLVM,RISCV,2682,"The next statement could be: 
SDValue VecEltVT = getScalarType(VecVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2683,"return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(Elt0, DL, Op.getValueType());"
LLVM,RISCV,2684,It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,2685,"The next statement will be ""return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(Elt0, DL, Op.getValueType());""."
LLVM,RISCV,2686,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(RVVOpcode, DL, VecEltVT, Vec, VL, Mask, M1VT, XLenVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2687,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. It could be anything from another case statement to a default case or a different type of statement altogether.
LLVM,RISCV,2688,The next statement would be "if ( CheckUndefs ( Shift ) && MatchShift ( Shift ) ) return Shift ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2689,"No prediction can be made based on this code snippet, as it is missing important context and variable definitions."
LLVM,RISCV,2690,"SDValue FPToIntZero = DAG.getNode(Opc, DL, DstVT, FpToInt, ZeroInt);"
LLVM,RISCV,2691,The next statement is: return SDValue();
LLVM,RISCV,2692,The code will return false.
LLVM,RISCV,2693,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2694,Throw an error/warning/message.
LLVM,RISCV,2695,"The next statement is:

APInt NumElements = APInt::getNullValue(Context, ValueVTBitSize / PartVTBitSize);"
LLVM,RISCV,2696,"if ( IsVWMULSU )
Op1 = DAG.getNode(WMulOpc, DL, VT, Op0, Op1);"
LLVM,RISCV,2697,This code snippet is incomplete. There will likely be more statements following the last statement in the code.
LLVM,RISCV,2698,"Else


if ( Addend != * SeqAddend ) return None;"
LLVM,RISCV,2699,The next statement would be "if (AI->getOperation() == AtomicRMWInst::Min || AI->getOperation() == AtomicRMWInst::Max)"
LLVM,RISCV,2700,"return <STR_LIT> ;


""case AtomicRMWInst :: UMax : return <STR_LIT>;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2701,"return <STR_LIT> ;


There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2702,Info . size = NULL;
LLVM,RISCV,2703,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Expand ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2704,"""If the size of the type used in the AtomicRMWInst is a primitive, then expand the atomic operation."""
LLVM,RISCV,2705,if ( Size == <NUM_LIT> || Size == <NUM_LIT> ) return AtomicExpansionKind :: MaskedIntrinsic ;
LLVM,RISCV,2706,"return <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement would be
case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2707,"return
<STR_LIT>

This code snippet is incomplete and does not have a default case, so it is not possible to predict the next statement. It could potentially continue with more case statements or end with a default statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2708,"break ; }

The next statement is a ""break"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2709,"The code will check for specific cases, simplify the demanded bits, and then return a new SDValue or an empty SDValue."
LLVM,RISCV,2710,"The code will check for the value type and assert that it is equal to a <STR_LIT> string, while also checking if the Subtarget is 64-bit and has the standard extension ""M""."
LLVM,RISCV,2711,The next statement is setting the boolean contents to ZeroOrOneBooleanContent.
LLVM,RISCV,2712,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Custom )"
LLVM,RISCV,2713,The code snippet has reached its end and will now return a boolean value of true.
LLVM,RISCV,2714,"auto *AtomicFence = Builder.CreateAtomicCmpXchg(AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask, Ordering, Ordering);"
LLVM,RISCV,2715,"</s>

The next statement will be a conditional statement that checks if the opcode of the operand Op0 is equal to <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2716,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Expand ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2717,"StackOffset = Align ( StackOffset , StackAlign ) ; }

The code will set a variable named StackOffset to a value calculated using the Align function and the variables XLenInBytes and ArgFlags1."
LLVM,RISCV,2718,"} }</s>

The next statement would be to check if the LocVT is equal to <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,2719,"The next statement will likely check if the LocVT is equal to another value, possibly to determine which list of registers to use."
LLVM,RISCV,2720,STR_LIT is a placeholder for a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,2721,"}

False"
LLVM,RISCV,2722,"The next statement is ""case <STR_LIT> : { assert ( ! Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; SDVTList VTs = DAG . getVTList ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ; SDValue RCW = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VTs , N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; Results . push_back ( DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> , RCW , RCW . getValue ("
LLVM,RISCV,2723,"It is currently at line 23.
The next statement is ""CCValAssign VA = PendingLocs[1];""."
LLVM,RISCV,2724,"The next statement is: CC_<ISA_LIT>Assign2XLen ( XLen , State , VA , AF , ValNo , ValVT , LocVT , ArgFlags ) ."
LLVM,RISCV,2725,"The code is pushing a flag onto the RetOps vector, then performing a conditional push of another flag onto the vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2726,"The next statement is ""setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Expand ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2727,The code snippet will return a boolean value of true.
LLVM,RISCV,2728,"DAG.getNode(""STR_LIT"", DL, VecEltVT, Reduction, DAG.getConstant(""<NUM_LIT>"", DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT()));"
LLVM,RISCV,2729,"return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VecEltVT , Reduction , DAG . getConstant ( <NUM_LIT> , DL , Subtarget . getXLenVT ( ) ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2730,"return lowerVectorIntrinsicShuffles(Op, DAG, Subtarget);"
LLVM,RISCV,2731,"return DAG . getMergeValues ( { Result , Chain } , DL ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2732,"}

The next statement will likely involve converting MaskVT to a scalable vector using the convertToScalableVector function, using the Mask variable as an argument."
LLVM,RISCV,2733,"VL = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, DL, ContainerVT, PassThru, Mask) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2734,"The next statement is: MaskVT = convertToScalableVector ( MaskVT , Mask , DAG , Subtarget ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2735,"if (IsUnmasked) SDValue ST = DAG.getTruncStore(MSN->getChain(), DL, Val, Index, Mask, XLenVT, VL); else SDValue ST = DAG.getIndexedMaskedStore(MSN->getChain(), DL, Val, Mask, DAG.getConvertRndSat(SDValue(Val), XLenVT), Index, VL, XLenVT, IsUnmasked, XLenVT, IntID, Subtarget.is64Bit(), MachinePointerInfo(Mask.getNode()));"
LLVM,RISCV,2736,"IntID = DAG.getRegister(<STR_LIT>, XLenVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2737,"// Set up a new SDValue for the Mask and VL operations
SDValue Mask_VL = Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,2738,if (VecEVT.isSimple() && VecEVT < Desc->getValueType(0)) { Skip = true }
LLVM,RISCV,2739,"return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(Elt0, DL, Op.getValueType());"
LLVM,RISCV,2740,"return DAG . getSetCC ( DL , XLenVT , Vec , One , <STR_LIT> ) ;


Vec = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, XLenVT, Vec, Mask, VL) ; // This line is missing a semicolon
return DAG.getSetCC(DL, XLenVT, Vec, Zero, <STR_LIT>) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2741,"}

""There will be a conditional statement checking the value of Alignment against the store size of ElemVT, and if the condition is met, the value of Fast will be set to true."""
LLVM,RISCV,2742,"}

If Opc is not equal to <STR_LIT>, returns SDValue()."
LLVM,RISCV,2743,"if ( Opc == <STR_LIT> && N -> getYVerbOFxSXXCxX2467

""In this code snippet, an if statement checks if the value of Opc is equal to a specific string literal and if the flags of N do not have the attribute of allow reassociation. If this condition is met, the next statement will return a SDValue."""
LLVM,RISCV,2744,"This code snippet creates a new SDValue called NewRes using the WOpcode and DL variables, and the NewOps vector filled with values from the N->ops() function."
LLVM,RISCV,2745,Add a machine instruction to the HeadMBB using the BuildMI method.
LLVM,RISCV,2746,The code will insert IfFalseMBB and TailMBB into the MachineFunction and then transfer the MachineInstr * DebugInstr from the SelectDebugValues vector to the TailMBB.
LLVM,RISCV,2747,"*

if(VecVT == MVT::i32) {
  return DAG.getAllOnesVector(VecVT, DL);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2748,">

The next statement may be a return statement that uses the variables declared and initialized in the previous code."
LLVM,RISCV,2749,"The next statement could potentially be a case statement for another vector element type, such as ""case MVT::v16i8:""."
LLVM,RISCV,2750,"SDValue One = DAG.getNode(ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR, DL, ContainerVT, Mask);"
LLVM,RISCV,2751,The return type of getMaskTypeFor will be MVT.
LLVM,RISCV,2752,EC will be assigned a value based on the element count of the VecVT vector.
LLVM,RISCV,2753,"This code will check if the number of elements in Mask matches the vector size VT, and then initialize an array called ""Srcs"". It will then loop through the elements of Mask and check if the current element is less than a certain number. If so, it will skip over it. It will then calculate the value of ""Pol"" and ""Src"", and check if the value at the index ""Pol"" in Srcs is less than a certain number. If so, it will set it to the value of ""Src"". It will then check if the value at the index ""Pol"" in Srcs is equal to the"
LLVM,RISCV,2754,"return 

false"
LLVM,RISCV,2755,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2756,"SDValue ExtractElt = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , ContainerVT , Vec ,

return DAG .getNode (, DL, ContainerVT, Vec, ExtractElementIdx);"
LLVM,RISCV,2757,"SDValue Select = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, Cmp, Op1, Op2);"
LLVM,RISCV,2758,"The next statement is likely to be a return statement, since the code snippet ends with a return statement."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,2756,"return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , EltVT , Vec , Idx ) ;


return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ContainerVT, Vec, Idx);"
LLVM,RISCV,2757,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(SD, DL, ResultVT, Cmp);"
LLVM,RISCV,2758,"An address is returned by calling the 'getAddr' function on the input nodes, along with additional arguments specifying the current DAG and whether the global value is assumed to be local or not."
LLVM,RISCV,2759,It is likely that the next statement will involve using the "GV" variable to access or manipulate data related to the global value object.
LLVM,RISCV,2760,"case TLSModel :: LocalDynamic : <NUM_LIT> 

default switch statement }"
LLVM,RISCV,2761,"If the condition ""IsUnmasked"" is false, a masked memory intrinsic node will be returned with the additional mask operand. If it is true, an unmasked memory intrinsic node will be returned without the mask operand."
LLVM,RISCV,2762,"The next statement is a return statement, which returns a DAG node with the given arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,2763,">

A statement returning a merge of values from a given range."
LLVM,RISCV,2764,"<STR_LIT> = convertToMask ( MaskVT , Mask , DAG , Subtarget ) ; }
IsUnmaskedVec = IsUnmasked && VT.isFixedLengthVector();"
LLVM,RISCV,2765,"The next statement would be:
SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, VT, Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2766,"The next statement would most likely be:
SDValue Store = DAG.getNode(ISD::STORE, DL, MVT::Other, Val, BasePtr, Index, NULL, MachinePointerInfo(), 0,
/*IsVolatile=*/false, wasMemIndexed, isTruncatingStore, VL.getOperand(1));"
LLVM,RISCV,2767,"Next, there may be a conditional statement using the boolean variable ""IsUnmasked"" to determine the next course of action in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,2768,"The code snippet will likely return ""convertFromScalableVector(VT, Result, DAG, Subtarget)"" after the if statement that checks if VT is a fixed length vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2769,"The code will create a new node, ""Vec,"" using DAG.getNode() with parameters <STR_LIT>, DL, I32VT, Passthru, Vec, ScalarHi, I32Mask, I32VL. It will then pass Vec to DAG.getBitcast() to convert it into the desired vector type, ""VT."" If ""IsMasked"" is true, the function will return Vec as the final result. If ""IsMasked"" is false, a Mask value will be retrieved from the Operands list and Vec will be combined with the Mask using a bitwise logical AND operation. The result will then be"
LLVM,RISCV,2770,"SDValue SplatNegOne = DAG.getConstant(<NUM_LIT>, DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT());"
LLVM,RISCV,2771,"}

The next statement would be:
SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, DstVT, Result, DAG.getValueType(MVT::v2i1));"
LLVM,RISCV,2772,"""LLVMContext & Context = * DAG . getContext ( ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2773,"The next statement is: 

if (ImmValue >= <NUM_LIT>) { 
	DownOffset = DAG.getConstant(ImmValue, DL, XLenVT); 
	UpOffset = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, XLenVT, VLMax, DownOffset); 
} else { 
	UpOffset = DAG.getConstant(-ImmValue, DL, XLenVT); 
	DownOffset = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, XLenVT, VLMax, UpOffset); 
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2774,SDValue VL = Op . getOperand (1);
LLVM,RISCV,2775,"If VT is not a fixed length vector, the code will return the Result value, otherwise it will return the result of converting Result from a scalable vector to a fixed length vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2776,"""""""

The next statement will be:

Ops.push_back(convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, V, DAG, Subtarget));"
LLVM,RISCV,2777,"return convertFromScalableVector ( VT , VPOp , DAG , Subtarget ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2778,"break ; }

Result = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ContainerVT, Temp, AllOneMask, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2779,"If no suitable combining operation is found, the code will continue to execute."
LLVM,RISCV,2780,"</s>

The next statement will be a ""return"" statement followed by the variable ""V""."
LLVM,RISCV,2781,"}

SDValue N1 = N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2782,"returns combineSelectAndUseCommutative ( N , DAG , false )"
LLVM,RISCV,2783,This code snippet does not have enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It may depend on the values of GORC and SHFL and the execution flow of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,2784,"This code snippet is implementing a conditional statement. The ""if"" statement checks if the conditions specified in the code are met. If they are, the code executes and returns the result of the ""getNode"" operation using the specified parameters. If the conditions are not met, the code continues on to the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2785,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2786,"""}
There is not enough information given to predict the next statement. The code could continue with another function or code block, or end with a closing brace."
LLVM,RISCV,2787,return Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && CI -> getType ( ) -> isIntegerPtrTy ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2788,"This code snippet checks if a given vector type is valid for RVV instructions, and returns false if it is not. Then, it checks the minimum required vector size and the vector element type. Depending on the element type, it may check additional conditions using the Subtarget object."
LLVM,RISCV,2789,"It looks like the code is checking whether ""VT"" is a scalable vector and if not, it will return ""false"". Then, it sets ""ElemVT"" to the element type of ""VT"" and checks if ""Alignment"" is greater than or equal to the store size of the element type. If so, it will set ""Fast"" to true and return ""true"". If not, it will return ""false"". So, the next statement could be something like:

""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2790,"The ISA ABI and data layout details for the given input types are retrieved.


CCInfo has to be used to check if the given input types match the ABI and data layout details for the given ISA."
LLVM,RISCV,2791,"""LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << <STR_LIT> << FirstMaskArgument << <STR_LIT> << ArgVT.isVector() << '\n');"""
LLVM,RISCV,2792,"""llvm_unreachable(nullptr);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2793,"It . <NUM_LIT> ; Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of the variables used in the code."
LLVM,RISCV,2794,There is no code to predict in this snippet as it lacks a closing brace to complete the <STR_LIT> function.
LLVM,RISCV,2795,"In the next statement, the code will execute a comparison using the function ""isZeroOrAllOnes"" and assign a value to the variable ""SwapSelectOps"" based on the result of the comparison."
LLVM,RISCV,2796,"if ( SDValue Result = combineSelectCCAndUse ( N , N2 , N1 , DAG , AllOnes ) ) return Result ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2797,"if ( SDValue Result = combineSelectCCAndUse ( N , N2 , N2 , DAG , AllOnes ) ) return Result ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2798,"Known.Zero.setLowBits(<NUM_LIT>);
break; } case <STR_LIT>: {
unsigned IntNo = Op.getConstantOperandVal(<NUM_LIT>);
switch (IntNo) {"
LLVM,RISCV,2799,"else if ( Tmp < <NUM_LIT> )

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables and the logic of the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2800,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2801,The next statement could be a conditional statement checking if the variable VT is less than Subtarget's getXLen() and returns false if that condition is met.
LLVM,RISCV,2802,It will return the constraint type using TargetLowering.
LLVM,RISCV,2803,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of <STR_LIT>, <NUM_LIT>, Op, DAG, DL, EltVT, BaseOpcode, and Flags."
LLVM,RISCV,2804,There is no next statement. The break statement ends the case block and the code snippet ends.
LLVM,RISCV,2805,The next statement is likely to be related to the comparison between C1Cost and another variable or the assignment of a value to C1Cost.
LLVM,RISCV,2806,"""SDValue Result = convertToScalableVector(VT, NewLoad, DAG, Subtarget);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2807,">


'SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, DL, ContainerVT, Load, VL)'"
LLVM,RISCV,2808,"}

Break.

If the condition is true, the value of VT will be reassigned to the value of <STR_LIT>. This could potentially result in the code breaking."
LLVM,RISCV,2809,"The next statement might be:

// <STR_LIT> is moved into stack"
LLVM,RISCV,2810,"SDNode *BuildLoad = DAG.getMachineNode(ISD::LOAD, DL, VTs, Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2811,"The next statement is: `VL = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, SDLoc(Index), VT, Index, DAG.getConstant(IsUnmasked, SDLoc(Index), MVT::i1));`"
LLVM,RISCV,2812,"The next statement is:

return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Op.getValueType(), Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2813,"Obviously, the next statement will involve the <STR_LIT> operator and will modify the StepVec variable by adding the StepVal variable as an operand. This will continue the manipulation of the DAG graph for optimization purposes."
LLVM,RISCV,2814,"if ( isConstantVecElts_64 ( StepVec ) ) { StepVec = DAG . getVmerge ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VT , StepVec , StepVal , Subtarget . isLittleEndian ( ) ) ; } else { StepVec = SDValue ( ) ; } }

The next statement is a closing curly brace, ending the if statement. This is followed by a semicolon."
LLVM,RISCV,2815,"GatherIndicesRHS.push_back(DAG.getConstant(std::numeric_limits<int>::max(), DL, XLenVT));"
LLVM,RISCV,2816,The code will continue to push the value V to the operand list Ops.
LLVM,RISCV,2817,The next statement would likely be an if statement checking for the condition SHLExpMask == true.
LLVM,RISCV,2818,N = DAGRoot;
LLVM,RISCV,2819,"This code snippet will perform an AND operation on the variables ""N"" and ""DAG"" and will use the results to combine a select code with a commutative operation, returning the combined result."
LLVM,RISCV,2820,"} }

The next statement would likely check if there are any other combine functions for ORs, and potentially return a combined node if one is found."
LLVM,RISCV,2821,"else { if ( auto GREV = combineORToGREV ( SDValue ( N , <NUM_LIT> ) , DAG , Subtarget ) ) return GREV ; return CombineToNOREGSX ( N , DAG , Subtarget ) ; }
return CombineToNOREGSX ( N , DAG , Subtarget ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2822,"</s>

<s>    DCI.AddToWorklist(&N);</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,2823,"return combineRotateAndInsertBitField(N, DAG, Subtarget);"
LLVM,RISCV,2824,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,2825,break;
LLVM,RISCV,2826,"""if (Step != SeqStep) return None;"""
LLVM,RISCV,2827,None
LLVM,RISCV,2828,"if ( CCVal != <STR_LIT> && CCVal != <STR_LIT> && CCVal != <STR_LIT> ) return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> ( ) , DL , XLenVT , Ops ) ;

else {
    return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, CondV, TrueV, FalseV);
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2829,"IndexVT = XLenVT ; } else if ( <STR_LIT> ) { GatherOpc = <STR_LIT> ; }

return DAG.getNode(GatherOpc, DL, VT, GatherIndicesLHS, GatherIndicesRHS, MaskVals)"
LLVM,RISCV,2830,'else if (VT.getFixedSizeInBits() > MinVLen * MinVLen
LLVM,RISCV,2831,"case <STR_LIT> : return emitCmpF64Pseudo ( MI , BB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2832,"return <STR_LIT> ;

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context, as the code snippet provided is incomplete and does not contain any conditions or code execution. It is possible that the snippet will continue with more <case> statements or move on to another part of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,2833,if (C1Cost >= ShiftedC1Cost + <UNKNOWN> Ty -> get </STR_LIT> = <STR_LIT> )
LLVM,RISCV,2834,"if ( Op0 . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) return ;
""Results.push_back(customLegalizeToWOp(N, DAG));"""
LLVM,RISCV,2835,"In the next statement, the code will return the result of a right shift operation on the extracted element with the specified index and the specified bit index offset."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,2837,"if ( DstEltVT == SrcEltVT )>

The next statement of this code snippet will be ""Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, DL, ContainerVT, Src, Mask, VL);"", where ""ContainerVT"" is the vector type created for the fixed-length vector and ""VL"" is the default vector length operand. This will build a vector from the source and mask operands using the desired vector type."
LLVM,RISCV,2838,"""Result"" will be stored as a new SDValue node that combines the previous nodes ""Src,"" ""Splat,"" ""ZeroSplat,"" and ""VL"" in a specific operation."
LLVM,RISCV,2839,"The next statement will likely involve using the values created in the previous statements (Src, ZeroSplat, Splat) and performing some operation on them, potentially using the getConstant method again or calling a different method on the DAG object."
LLVM,RISCV,2840,"If the value type is not a fixed length vector, the code will return the variable ""Result""."
LLVM,RISCV,2841,">

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the initial values of the variables and the context of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2842,"</s>

This is the end of the loop."
LLVM,RISCV,2843,"}

""if ( Subtarget . hasStdExtV ( ) ) preAssignMask ( Outs , FirstMaskArgument , CCInfo ) ; for ( unsigned i = 1 ; i != NumArgs ; i ++ ) { MVT ArgVT = Outs [ i ] . VT ; EVT ArgEVT = EVT ( ArgVT ) ; <STR_LIT> ArgFlags = Outs [ i ] . Flags ; Type * OrigTy = CLI ? CLI -> getArgs ( ) [ Outs [ i ] . OrigArgIndex ] . Ty : nullptr ; <STR_LIT> ABI = MF . getSubtarget < <ISA_LIT"
LLVM,RISCV,2844,"( CallConv , IsVarArg , MF , RVLocs , Context ) ; }

Optional < unsigned > NextMaskargument ."
LLVM,RISCV,2845,"The next statement could be a closing curly bracket, or a statement within the if statement, such as a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2846,"Reg = State . AllocateReg ( ArgVRM8s ) ; } return false

The next statement is ""return false""."
LLVM,RISCV,2847,return SDValue();
LLVM,RISCV,2848,"The next statement is likely to be the end of a class or function definition, marked by a closing curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,2849,None. The code snippet does not have any further instructions or any loop statement that would predict another statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2850,return isEqual
LLVM,RISCV,2851,The code snippet appears to be missing context and may not be sufficient to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2852,"return <STR_LIT> ;

The next statement could be another case statement followed by a return statement for a string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,2853,"</s>

The next statement is likely the end of an if statement or switch statement, potentially followed by a closing brace."
LLVM,RISCV,2854,The code snippet has ended.
LLVM,RISCV,2855,"The code checks if the IsVarArg flag is set and creates code to handle variable arguments if needed. If there are any outgoing chains, they are pushed onto the OutChains vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2856,"return SDValue::SDValue(EVT, uint64_t);"
LLVM,RISCV,2857,"SDValue Base = Op . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; if ( VT == MVT :: <STR_LIT> ) return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VT , Base ) ;

case <END>: LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN (Op, DAG);"
LLVM,RISCV,2858,"SDLoc DL ( Op ) ; if ( Op . getValueType ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) { return DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> ) ; } </s>
It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context."
LLVM,RISCV,2859,"Chain = SDValue(Glue, RVLocs);"
LLVM,RISCV,2860,The next statement is a conditional statement with an "else" clause.
LLVM,RISCV,2861,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(CondCodeSDNode.get(), DL, Op.getValueType(), Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2862,"<STR_LIT>

auto NewMask = ( Src . getValueSizeInBits ( ) & ExpMask ) ;>

auto NewMask = Src.getConstantOperandVal (Width) & ExpMask;"
LLVM,RISCV,2863,"return SDValue ( N , <NUM_LIT> ) ; } break ; }

No prediction can be made with the given code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,2864,FirstMaskArgument points to the index of a scalable vector argument in the Args vector with a simple type of <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,2865,"}

""Try assigning the first mask argument to the current argument index of the loop and break the loop if successful."""
LLVM,RISCV,2866,SDNode * ValPtr = DAG.getMachineFunction().getNodePtr();
LLVM,RISCV,2867,"N = SelectionDAG :: 

getNode(ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, DL, NarrowVT, N->getOperand(0), Mask, VL)"
LLVM,RISCV,2868,"></s>

This code snippet creates two SDValue objects, Op0 and Op1, and then checks the value of the Commute variable. If Commute is true, Op0 and Op1 are swapped. A new MVT object, VT, is then created using a method call on the SDValue object, N. The size of the vector is calculated and stored in the NarrowSize variable, and a new MVT object, NarrowVT, is created using the narrow size and the vector element count. The Mask and VL values are retrieved from N and stored in their respective variables, and a new SDLoc object, DL,"
LLVM,RISCV,2869,if (ShAmt1 < 0) return SDValue();
LLVM,RISCV,2870,"The next statement would be to assign a new value to ""CombinedShAmt"" by using the bitwise operation ""OR"" on the two shift amounts, ShAmt1 and ShAmt2."
LLVM,RISCV,2871,Op0 = Op0 . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> + 1 ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2872,"Lastly, the code will return the variable ""Res"" as the result."
LLVM,RISCV,2873,The value of x will be updated to the value of Res.
LLVM,RISCV,2874,- The code will assign the value of the shifted and masked x variable to the Res variable.
LLVM,RISCV,2875,"1.DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), DemandedElts, Depth + <NUM_LIT>);

Known will be set to the known bits of the operand of Op at index <NUM_LIT>, computed by the function computeKnownBits from the DAG class."
LLVM,RISCV,2876,"}

A statement to get the target machine's code model and evaluate the next case, which in this case is CodeModel::Medium."
LLVM,RISCV,2877,A new line of code appearing after the return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2878,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, AddrAdd, AddrLo, MNHi);"
LLVM,RISCV,2879,"Info . memVT = getTypeSizeInBits ( DL , I . getType ( ) -> getScalarType ( ) ) ;

Info . ptrVal = I . getArgOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;

This code sets the value of a variable called 'Info' and its properties, including the opcode, memory value type, pointer value, offset, alignment, and flags. There are three different cases, each with specific set of values for the properties. The next statement will likely continue setting the properties of 'Info' for a specific case. It may set the 'size' property, as it has not been set in"
LLVM,RISCV,2880,"</s>


    return (X.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC && X.getOperand(0).getOpcode() ==
           ISD::AND && Y.getOpcode() == ISD::Constant );"
LLVM,RISCV,2881,The next statement will be the end of the function and the final result of the comparison between the value of C and the <NUM_LIT> will be returned.
LLVM,RISCV,2882,int & MaskTarget = StartIdx < Size ? LoTarget : HiTarget;
LLVM,RISCV,2883,assert ( Rotation != <NUM_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2884,"The code will return false if C1 multiplied by C2 is not a signed integer, otherwise it will return true."
LLVM,RISCV,2885,"</s>


return false; // Could not find a legal shuffle mask"
LLVM,RISCV,2886,"return isLerpCycle(M, SVT, Subtarget);"
LLVM,RISCV,2887,"SDValue Splat = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, X, Mask, VL, SplatZero);"
LLVM,RISCV,2888,"This code snippet initializes a few variables and calls a function to get the default mask and vector length operations, and then uses them to create a ""SplatZero"" value that represents a vector filled with all zeros."
LLVM,RISCV,2889,"The next statement of this code snippet is:
SDValue Vec = DAG.getNode(/*Opcode*/, DL, ContainerVT, /*Ops*/);"
LLVM,RISCV,2890,"SDValue IntID = DAG.getTargetConstant(IsMaskOp ? ""masked_store"" : ""store"", DL, XLenVT);"
LLVM,RISCV,2891,"SDValue Reduce = DAG.getNode(RVVOpcode, DL, M1VT, DAG.getUNDEF(M1VT), VectorVal, ScalarSplat, Mask, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2892,The statement will likely involve assigning values to the variables "Mask" and "VL".
LLVM,RISCV,2893,"Truncated = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, Truncated, Src);"
LLVM,RISCV,2894,MaxVal . getNextToward(APFloat::getZero(/*negative=*/false)) ;
LLVM,RISCV,2895,"Truncated = DAG.getNode(pAdd, DL, VT, Truncated, MaxValNode);"
LLVM,RISCV,2896,return ValInVec;
LLVM,RISCV,2897,"return SDValue ( }

return SDValue (Vec, ValInVec);"
LLVM,RISCV,2898,"// This code will check if the variable VT is of type floating point and if the constant VL is equal to one. Depending on the result, it will either return a new node with <STR_LIT> as its value or a node with Passthru, Scalar, and VL as its values. After this, it will initialize a new variable XLenVT with the same value as the result of Subtarget.getXLenVT()."
LLVM,RISCV,2899,"SDValue XLenMinus1Minus1 = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, XLenMinus1, One);"
LLVM,RISCV,2900,"SDValue MinusXLen1 = DAG.getNode(ShiftLeftOp, DL, VT, ShiftRightLo, ShiftLeftHi);"
LLVM,RISCV,2901,"SDValue ShiftOp = DAG.getNode(ShiftRightOp, DL, VT, Hi, ShamtMinusXLen);"
LLVM,RISCV,2902,"The next statement is an if statement, checking if the variable HiC is equal to the variable LoC."
LLVM,RISCV,2903,"if (Hi.getOpcode() == <STR_LIT> && Hi.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>) == Lo && isa<ConstantSDNode>(Hi.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)) && Hi.getConstantOperandVal(<NUM_LIT>) == <NUM_LIT>) {
    return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VecVT, DAG.getUNDEF(VecVT), Lo, DAG.getRegister(<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>));
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2904,"SDValue StepVal = lowerScalarSplat (SDValue(), DAG.getConstant(StepValImm + 1, DL, VT.getVectorElementType()), VL, VT, DL, DAG, Subtarget); StepVec = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, StepVec, StepVal);"
LLVM,RISCV,2905,SDValue NextVal = DAG.getValue(StepVec);
LLVM,RISCV,2906,SDValue Vec = Op.getOperand(1);
LLVM,RISCV,2907,"return { getVectorElementCount(VecVT), convertToScalableVector(I1ContainerVT, Src, DAG, Subtarget), getDefaultVLOps(VecVT, ContainerVT, DL, DAG, Subtarget), Subtarget.getXLenVT(), DAG.getConstant(ExtTrueVal, DL, XLenVT) }"
LLVM,RISCV,2908,"SplatTrueVal = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ContainerVT, DAG.getUNDEF(ContainerVT), SplatTrueVal, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2909,"if ( VecVT . isScalableVector ( ) ) { SDValue Trunc = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , ContainerVT , Src , SplatOne ); return DAG . getSetCC ( DL , MaskVT , Trunc, SplatZero , <STR_LIT> ); }

The code snippet returns the result of a comparison between a truncated vector and a zero-splatted vector."
LLVM,RISCV,2910,"Trunc = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , MaskContainerVT , Trunc , SplatZero )

SDValue MaskResult = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, ContainerVT, Trunc, SplatOne, Mask, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2911,"The next statement will be: ""SDValue IDX = DAG.getNode(GatherOpc, DL, MVT::Other, SplatVL, VID);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2912,DAG = new target code if the condition returns true
LLVM,RISCV,2913,"<NUM_LIT>){ UpOffset = DAG . getNode(num_lit, DL, XLenVT, DownOffset);}
(unsigned)
  If the value of ImmValue is greater than or equal to <NUM_LIT>, UpOffset will be set to a node with the value of num_lit, the current debug location (DL), the type of XLenVT, and the value of DownOffset."
LLVM,RISCV,2914,"Src = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , InterimFVT , { Src , Mask , VL } ) ; } }
The next statement will be to check if the source value type is an integer."
LLVM,RISCV,2915,"The next statement would be:

return Reduction;"
LLVM,RISCV,2916,"return SDValue( getNode(SDNode <ID> , SDLoc(N), ContainerVT, { SplatVal }, SDVTList(ContainerVT), <ID>, SDFlags(WSI)), 0);"
LLVM,RISCV,2917,return Gather;
LLVM,RISCV,2918,The next statement will likely involve creating a new SDNode or modifying the current one based on the condition of the if statement. It may also involve accessing or modifying other operands or values in the code.
LLVM,RISCV,2919,"The next statement would be ""SDValue Res = SDValue::getNode (ISD :: SIGN_EXTEND, SDLoc(N), VT, Src);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2920,SDValue()
LLVM,RISCV,2921,"The code snippet is creating a new SDValue named ""Neg"" using the getNode function, passing in values for the operator, debug location (DL), value type (VT), and two operands which are constants. Then, the code snippet updates the value of ""Neg"" by again using the getNode function, this time passing in values for the operator, debug location (DL), and two operands which are the previous value of ""Neg"" and the value type. Finally, the snippet returns a new SDValue using the getNode function, passing in values for the operator, debug location (DL), value type, and two operands which are the"
LLVM,RISCV,2922,"<STR_LIT>


case Instruction :: InsertElt: return true ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2923,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VT, Passthru, Lo, Hi, VL);"
LLVM,RISCV,2924,"if ( LoC - HiC < 0 )

The code will perform an if statement that checks if the value of LoC subtracted by HiC is less than 0."
LLVM,RISCV,2925,"return concatPartsI64WithVL ( DL , VT , Passthru , Lo , Hi , VL , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2926,"if ( ! UseGPRForF64 ) Reg = State . AllocateReg ( ArgFPR64s , ArgFPR16s ) ; } ; 

The code snippet will check for additional conditions and allocate a register or stack space for the value based on its floating-point type."
LLVM,RISCV,2927,"Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VA.getValVT(), Val); break;"
LLVM,RISCV,2928,"The next statement would be:

Val = DAG.getNode(STR_LIT, DL, VA.getValVT(), Val);"
LLVM,RISCV,2929,"} } }

""a break statement"""
LLVM,RISCV,2930,No further code will be executed. The break statement in the if statement will cause the program to exit the loop and continue on to the next code outside of the loop.
LLVM,RISCV,2931,Frame index FI is obtained from the MoveF64FrameIndex method in the <ISA_LIT>MachineFunctionInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,2932,"BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII.get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(DstReg, getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).isKill())).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm(<NUM_LIT>).addMemOperand(MMO);"
LLVM,RISCV,2933,llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,2934,Register HiReg = MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg();
LLVM,RISCV,2935,There will likely be a default statement or the end of the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2936,"</s>

if (EltVT.getScalarType() != VecVT.getScalarType()) return Op;"
LLVM,RISCV,2937,EVT EltVT = VecVT .getVectorElementType();
LLVM,RISCV,2938,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Op.getValueType(), {Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), Promote, Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>), EII->ExtendedOpera"
LLVM,RISCV,2939,"The next statement predicts that there will be a check for a const variable of type <STR_LIT>. If the variable is found and its ""ExtendedOperand"" property is true, then an assertion will be made, followed by the creation of a vector of SDValues from the current operand. Finally, a reference to the element at the extended operand index will be assigned to the variable ""ScalarOp""."
LLVM,RISCV,2940,"SDValue Lo = GetElt ( ), SDValue Hi = GetElt ( );

The next statement could be a default case for handling any other <STR_LIT> cases that were not explicitly defined in the previous statements."
LLVM,RISCV,2941,"return lowerSETCC ( Op , DAG ) ;

This code snippet is incomplete and lacks context, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. It is likely that another case statement will be added to this code, but the specific details are unknown. The code appears to be handling various operations and returning values, so the next statement could involve another operation or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2942,"case <STR_LIT> : assert ( N -> getValueType ( <NUM_LIT> ) == <STR_LIT> && Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && Subtarget . hasStdExtM ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; if ( N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> || N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) return ; Results . push_back ( customLegalizeToWOp ( N , DAG ) ) ; break ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2943,"Val = DAG . getNode ( )
copyFromReg

define"
LLVM,RISCV,2944,"</s>


The next statement is likely to be ""break;"" or ""return""."
LLVM,RISCV,2945,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,2946,The next statement would likely be another if statement that checks if LocVT is either <STR_LIT> or <STR_LIT> and then performs some operations on State.
LLVM,RISCV,2947,"return emitSplitF64Pseudo ( MI , BB ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2948,"return emitBuildPairI64Pseudo (MI, BB);"
LLVM,RISCV,2949,"The code snippet will compile successfully and create a function called ""MaskedCmpXchg"" with five arguments, and then call that function with those five arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,2950,"The next statement is:

Value* Result = Builder.CreateCall(MaskedCmpXchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask});"
LLVM,RISCV,2951,"The next statement is: Builder.CreateCall(LrwOpScwLoop, {AlignedAddr, Ordering, Incr, Mask, ShiftAmt}, """");// LrwOpScwLoop (aligned_addr, ordering, incr, mask, shift_amt)"
LLVM,RISCV,2952,The next statement is "return Result;".
LLVM,RISCV,2953,The next statement is "return Load;".
LLVM,RISCV,2954,"Next, the code will likely include the function call SDValue::setValue (Load, Args) to set the value of Load and Args."
LLVM,RISCV,2955,"The next statement will be to check if the Subtarget's ABI (Application Binary Interface) matches a string literal and return a numeric literal if it does, otherwise return another numeric literal."
LLVM,RISCV,2956,"if (Subtarget.getTargetABI() == ABI::SysV)
  return R8;



} else {
  return R3;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,2957,"This function returns the exception pointer register based on the target ABI, or an empty string if there is no target ABI."
LLVM,RISCV,2958,"""If the size of Op is greater than or equal to CapSize, then create a new Align object called CapAlign with size CapSize. Print the function name, Op size, DstAlign value (if Op is fixed), SrcAlign value (if Op is memset), and CapSize. If Op is aligned with CapAlign, return CapType. Otherwise, if Op is not a memset operation, return <STR_LIT>."""
LLVM,RISCV,2959,The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to end the function.
LLVM,RISCV,2960,The variable "AddrCIncOffset" will be set to the value <STR_LIT> through a function call using DAG . getMachineNode.
LLVM,RISCV,2961,return TailPaddingAmount::Default;
LLVM,RISCV,2962,"return true ;

After the code has executed, the next statement would be the termination of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,2963,BlockAddressSDNode *nextNode = getNextNode(N);
LLVM,RISCV,2964,"}

The next statement is a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2965,"return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Op.getValueType(), Op, Op. getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getNextNode(), LHS, RHS, TargetCC, Op. getOperand(<NUM_LIT>));"
LLVM,RISCV,2966,ConstantPoolSDNode * NextN = cast < ConstantPoolSDNode > (N.getNextNode());
LLVM,RISCV,2967,"The while loop will loop through and decrement the Depth variable until it reaches 0. Inside the loop, it will calculate the offset value using the XLenInBytes variable and the constant <NUM_LIT>. It will then use that offset to calculate a new pointer using FrameAddr and the SDValue Ptr. Finally, it will load the value at this new pointer using the getLoad function and return the result as FrameAddr."
LLVM,RISCV,2968,"The next statement is: ""if (Offset != <NUM_LIT>) return DAG.getPointerAdd(DL, Addr, Offset);""."
LLVM,RISCV,2969,"</s>
The statement could be related to determining whether the global value is local or remote, based on whether it should assume DSOLocal for the parent of the global value. This could involve additional checks or conditionals to determine the appropriate behavior or handling of the global value."
LLVM,RISCV,2970,"If Offset is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, return a pointer added to DAG with DL and Offset as inputs. Otherwise, return Addr."
LLVM,RISCV,2971,"if ( IsMasked ){ - Node : DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , I32MaskVT , Vec , <NUM_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , I32Mask , I32VL ) ;}else{ - ""Node : DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , Vec , ScalarLo ( INNER_LIT) <STR_LIT> ) ;if ( IntNo == <STR_LIT> ) - return PREDICT: case SELECT: Node : SDValue SelectFP = DAG.getNode(""FP_SELECT"",DL,XLenVT,ScalarHi, DAG.getSExt"
LLVM,RISCV,2972,return the generated code for lowering the jump table statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2973,"This code snippet will return the address of a node, using the node name and type, with debug and LLVM instruction options set to true."
LLVM,RISCV,2974,The next statement would return a load instruction using the lowerFRAMEADDR method with the FrameAddr variable as the pointer and the Off variable as the offset.
LLVM,RISCV,2975,"return DAG.getNode(""<STR_LIT>"", DL, Op.getValueType(), Ops);"
LLVM,RISCV,2976,"The code will run the ""translateSetCCForBranch"" function passing in the DL, LHS, RHS, and CCVal variables."
LLVM,RISCV,2977,"It is impossible to predict the exact next statement without knowledge of the code snippet. However, it is likely that the statement will involve the Value * SV variable in some way, such as assigning it a value or using it in some operation."
LLVM,RISCV,2978,"return SDValue (
return SDValue();"
LLVM,RISCV,2979,return AtomicExpansionKind :: None ;
LLVM,RISCV,2980,return AtomicExpansionKind::UnmaskedIntrinsic;
LLVM,RISCV,2981,"The code will check if the AI object is performing a floating point operation and if so, will return the AtomicExpansionKind of CmpXChg. If not, it will then proceed to create an unsigned integer variable called Size and set its value to the primitive size in bits of the AI object's type."
LLVM,RISCV,2982,"</s>

<STR_LIT> ABI = Subtarget . getTargetABI ( )"
LLVM,RISCV,2983,TRUE
LLVM,RISCV,2984,Val = FIN.getValue(0);
LLVM,RISCV,2985,"The next statement of this code snippet could be a return statement returning a boolean value, comparing an operand with a '*'. For example: return operand == '*';"
LLVM,RISCV,2986,"The next statement will likely be a case statement, as the code snippet appears to be part of a larger switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,2987,"Assuming the input `Reg` is not equal to the first <STR_LIT>, the next statement would be to check if `Reg` is reserved by either the subtarget or the user and throw a fatal error if it is not."
LLVM,RISCV,2988,}
LLVM,RISCV,2989,"""In the case that the value is not constant, the function will return an empty SDValue and print out a debug message."""
LLVM,RISCV,2990,There is no next statement. The code snippet ends after this last "if" statement.
LLVM,RISCV,2991,"case <STR_LIT> : { assert ( Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && Subtarget . hasStdExtF ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; SDLoc DL ( Op ) ; SDValue Op0 = Op . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ; if ( Op . getValueType ( ) != <STR_LIT> || Op0 . getValueType ( ) != <STR_LIT> ) return SDValue ( ) ; SDValue NewOp0 = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , <STR_LIT> , Op0 ) ; SDValue Sqrt"
LLVM,RISCV,2992,">

""BuildMI(*TailMBB, InsertionPoint, SelectMBBI->getDebugLoc(), TII.get(<STR_LIT>), SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addReg(SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addMBB(TailMBB).addReg(SelectMBBI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).addMBB(IfFalseMBB);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2993,"default: return

C_RegisterClass"
LLVM,RISCV,2994,The next statement is: EVT VT = DAG.getVTList(Index.getNode()->getValueType(0)).getValueType(0);
LLVM,RISCV,2995,"The next statement would likely be a ""default"" case, returning a default response for any inputs that do not match the previous three cases. This could include an error message or default behavior."
LLVM,RISCV,2996,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Expand ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,2997,"Another repeat of ""setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Expand ) ;""."
LLVM,RISCV,2998,"</s>


 -- The code snippet will define a new class called ""TargetLowering"" that inherits from <ISA_LIT> and includes a constructor function."
LLVM,RISCV,2999,"The next statement could be a constructor for the TargetLowering class, setting up its initial state."
LLVM,RISCV,3000,assert ( VA . isMemLoc ( ) && "Expected a memory location") ;
LLVM,RISCV,3001,"Val = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , Val . <STR_LIT> . // <STR_LIT>

SDValue GlueVal = SplitF64.getValue(1);RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(VA.getLocReg(), VA.getLocVT()));Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, DL, VA.getLocReg(), Val, GlueVal);GlueVal = Chain.getValue(1);"
LLVM,RISCV,3002,"The next statement will be:
llvm_unreachable(nullptr);"
LLVM,RISCV,3003,The next statement will be an opening curly brace to begin a code block.
LLVM,RISCV,3004,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will be a conditional if statement that follows this one."
LLVM,RISCV,3005,"if ( CC_<ISA_LIT> ( MF.getDataLayout(), e, VT, CCValAssign::Full, ArgFlags, CCInfo, true, true ) ) 
return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,3006,CCInfo.AnalyzeCallOperands (MInst).
LLVM,RISCV,3007,"return VA . getLocVT ( ) ;

The code will likely return the location value type of the last argument in the list."
LLVM,RISCV,3008,"DAG.getStore(VA.getLocReg(), DL, Val, Chain, <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3009,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Expand ) ; is the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3010,"In the next statement, a CodeModel switch case is referenced and a new SDValue is returned."
LLVM,RISCV,3011,"The next statement could be: return SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, MNHi, AddrLo), <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3012,"</s>

""End of if statement."""
LLVM,RISCV,3013,"return DAG . getTargetBlockAddress ( N -Next=FirstNode )

return DAG.getTargetBlockAddress(N);"
LLVM,RISCV,3014,return 0;
LLVM,RISCV,3015,a target-specific operation returning a DAG operator
LLVM,RISCV,3016,The next statement would most likely be a "break" statement to end the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3017,"return lowerShiftRightParts ( Op , DAG ) ; } }

It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet would be another case statement, followed by a return statement for a different operation to be lowered."
LLVM,RISCV,3018,"Prediction: BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII.get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(DestReg, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(VLReg)</s>

The next statement is: return BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII.get(<STR_LIT>)).addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Kill);"
LLVM,RISCV,3019,"}

nullptr"
LLVM,RISCV,3020,The next statement could be a return statement that calls the function emitSelectPseudo with the parameters MI and BB.
LLVM,RISCV,3021,"</s>

It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables and the context in which this code is being executed."
LLVM,RISCV,3022,"The next statement could potentially be another if statement, another return statement, or the end of the code block. It is not possible to accurately predict without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,3023,"Predict the next statement of this code snippet:

The next statement is likely to be a return statement, as the current if statement seems to be handling the case where the vector element size is greater than 4 bits and the number of vector elements is greater than 1."
LLVM,RISCV,3024,The next statement will be to return a machine memory intrinsic node using the specified values and operations.
LLVM,RISCV,3025,"Not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could depend on the values of HiC, LoC, <NUM_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, DL, VT, Lo, and VL."
LLVM,RISCV,3026,"return SDValue ( cast < SDNode >(createGEP(VT, cast < Type >

Array type of VT

> getArrayElementType() , SDValue (LoC , DL ) , SDValue (cast < ConstantSDNode > (Hi ) -> getSExtValue() , DL) ) , 0);"
LLVM,RISCV,3027,"}

return CC_RISCV_Assign2XLen(XLen, State, VA, AF, ValNo, ValVT, LocVT, ArgFlags)��"
LLVM,RISCV,3028,return SDValue(NewOp0);
LLVM,RISCV,3029,"The next statement will be:
SDValue NewOp1 = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, MVT::f32, NewOp0);"
LLVM,RISCV,3030,"The next statement of this code snippet is ""default : break ;"". This means that if none of the previous cases match, the code will break out of the switch statement and continue with the next statements outside of the switch."
LLVM,RISCV,3031,The code is checking for a specific opcode and then combining nodes based on certain conditions.
LLVM,RISCV,3032,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , BF16VT , Expand ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3033,"<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT> };

No more actions will be set."
LLVM,RISCV,3034,"The code will check if the value of ""Base"" is equal to the value of the operand of the ""Op"" variable. If it is, then the ""Offset"" variable will be assigned the value of the operand of the ""Op"" variable. If not, the code will check if the value of ""Base"" is equal to another operand of the ""Op"" variable and assign that value to the ""Offset"" variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3035,"}

if ( Base == nullptr ) return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3036,"return LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN ( Op , DAG )

This code snippet is likely part of a set of case statements used for lowering certain operations or instructions within a compiler. The next statement is likely going to be another case statement, targeting a different operation or instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,3037,"}

The case <STR_LIT> section of the code will be executed."
LLVM,RISCV,3038,"The next statement would be: ""N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getOpcode() == <STR_LIT> ? Results.push_back(customLegalizeToWOp(N, DAG)) : Results.push_back(customLegalizeToWOpWithSExt(N, DAG));"""
LLVM,RISCV,3039,"The next statement could be another case statement, as the code snippet is part of a switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3040,"SDValue Ops <STR_LIT> = { Reverse };

""SDValue Ops <NUM_LIT> = { VL, PassThru, Mask };"""
LLVM,RISCV,3041,"phone memory bit

An instruction will be pushed onto the Ops vector."
LLVM,RISCV,3042,"Check if VT is a fixed-length container/Conclude the if statement for the code.

If VT is a fixed-length vector, the if statement will be executed and ContainerVT will be set to the container type of the fixed-length vector. A MaskVT variable will also be set to a scalable vector type with the same size as the ContainerVT. The Mask and PassThru variables will then be converted to scalable vectors using the convertToScalableVector function."
LLVM,RISCV,3043,SDValue Container = Val;
LLVM,RISCV,3044,"The next statement would be ""else { return nullptr; }"" since there is no closing brace after the return statement and the code would need to continue after the if statement. This indicates that as long as the condition in the if statement is not met, the function will return a null pointer."
LLVM,RISCV,3045,return V ;
LLVM,RISCV,3046,"if (Op != nullptr) {
    switch (Op->getOpcode()) {
        case Instruction::FAdd:
        case Instruction::FSub:
        case Instruction::FMul:
        case Instruction::FDiv:
            return true;
        case Instruction::Shl:
        case Instruction::LShr:
        case Instruction::AShr:
            return Operand == <NUM_LIT>;
        case Instruction::Call:
            if (auto *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(I)) {
                switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
                    case <STR_LIT>:
                        return Operand == <NUM"
LLVM,RISCV,3047,The next statement is a for loop that iterates through the uses of the instruction identified by the variable "Op".
LLVM,RISCV,3048,The next statement is "break;"
LLVM,RISCV,3049,Possible next statement: "default: return nullptr;"
LLVM,RISCV,3050,"The next statement will likely be another ""case"" statement, followed by a break or return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3051,"return lowerVARARG ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3052,Results.push_back(Res.getValue(I + 1));
LLVM,RISCV,3053,The next statement will be "Results.push_back(Res);".
LLVM,RISCV,3054,The next statement is to return a DGNode with the specified arguments.
LLVM,RISCV,3055,"""return DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, DL, Ty, V1, V2);"""
LLVM,RISCV,3056,"""SDValue finalResult = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, RegTy, rawResult, mask);"""
LLVM,RISCV,3057,"The next statement would likely involve the manipulation or use of the variables declared in the previous lines, such as performing an operation on the APInt pos or using the ConstantSDNode index to access a value."
LLVM,RISCV,3058,"case <STR_LIT> : { assert ( N -> getValueType ( <NUM_LIT> ) == <STR_LIT> && Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && Subtarget . hasStdExtD ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ; if ( N -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) return ; Results . push_back ( customLegalizeToWOp ( N , DAG ) ) ; break ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,3059,The next statement is assert(N->getValueType(<NUM_LIT>) == <STR_LIT> && Subtarget.is64Bit() && Subtarget.hasStdExtM() && <STR_LIT>).
LLVM,RISCV,3060,"setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Custom );
setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Custom );
setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Custom );
setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Custom );
setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) ? Legal : Custom );
setMaxAtomicSizeInBitsSupported( <NUM_LIT> );
setBooleanContents( ZeroOrOneBooleanContent );
unsigned FunctionAlignment = Subtarget.hasStdExt"
LLVM,RISCV,3061,"setOperationAction(<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>, Custom) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3062,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , XLenVT , Custom ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3063,"</s>

The next statement could be a closing curly brace } or a new <STR_LIT> case."
LLVM,RISCV,3064,"}

The next statement will likely be another ""case"" statement with different cases and asserts, similar to the previous ""case"" statements."
LLVM,RISCV,3065,"The code snippet may continue to define more variables and add new operations using MIB, before eventually ending with a return statement or ending the current function."
LLVM,RISCV,3066,This code snippet involves creating a register and adding it to a machine instruction builder (MIB). The next statement may involve checking for a certain condition related to the tied use operand and the variable "UseOpIdx".
LLVM,RISCV,3067,"} }

the next statement would be <STR_LIT> case <STR_LIT> :"
LLVM,RISCV,3068,"break;

 Known.logical_and(KnownBits::sdiv(Known.trunc(3), Known2.trunc(3)), Known2.sext(BitWidth));"
LLVM,RISCV,3069,"The next statement will most likely return the result of subtracting the size of a scalar value in bits from the length of a target platform, with an added numerical value."
LLVM,RISCV,3070,"""It will return emitReadCycleWidePseudo(MI, BB)"""
LLVM,RISCV,3071,"The code will check if the Opcode is equal to a specific value and then go to the corresponding case statement. After going through all the cases, it will return a null pointer."
LLVM,RISCV,3072,"The next statement will be:
return DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, SetCCVT, VID, SplattedVal, SplattedIdx);"
LLVM,RISCV,3073,"case <STR_LIT> : return LowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);"
LLVM,RISCV,3074,"The next statement is ""return lowerVectorMaskExt ( Op , DAG , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3075,"Hi = DAG . getNode ( <STR_LIT> , DL , VecVT , Hi , ThirtyTwoV ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3076,"if (isNullConstant ( Hi ) ) {
  return Lo ;
 }"
LLVM,RISCV,3077,"SplatZero = DAG . getSplatVector ( VecVT , DL , SplatZero ) ;

SplatTrueVal = DAG.getSplatVector(VecVT, DL, SplatTrueVal);"
LLVM,RISCV,3078,"SplatOne = DAG . getBuildVector ( VecVT , DL , { } ) ; SplatZero = DAG . getBuildVector ( VecVT , DL , { } ) ; }

SplatOne = DAG.getSplatVector(VecVT, DL, SplatOne);"
LLVM,RISCV,3079,"The next statement is:

return TLO.CombineTo(Op, NewOp);"
LLVM,RISCV,3080,"return DCI . CombineTo ( N , DAG . getNode ( N -> getOpcode ( ) , DL , Src . getValueType ( ) , Src , NewRHS ) ) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,3081,"case <NUM_LIT> : {
  SDValue Op1 = N -> getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);
  if (Op1->getOpcode() != <STR_LIT>)
    break;
  SDLoc DL (N);
  return DCI.CombineTo(N, DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, <STR_LIT>, Op0, Op1));
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3082,"return false ; }

if ( Base != Op -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) {
return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3083,"assert ( ValueVTs [ <NUM_LIT> ] == <STR_LIT> ) ;

The next statement could possibly be another case statement, where a different operation is applied to the operands of N. Alternatively, it could be a default case that simply returns without pushing any new results."
LLVM,RISCV,3084,"This code snippet is likely part of a larger function that is operating on some machine instructions. Based on the switch statement, it looks like this code is handling different cases based on the opcode of the current machine instruction (MI). The next statement is likely to create a new MachineInstrBuilder called ""jumpMI"" and use the BuildMI function to build a new machine instruction with the opcode ""jump"" and the operand RA. It then loops through the operands of the current machine instruction and adds them to the new jumpMI. Finally, it erases the current machine instruction and returns the basic block (BB) that was passed in."
LLVM,RISCV,3085,"The next statement would be a ""default"" statement, indicating that none of the cases were matched and the program should handle the error using the ""llvm_unreachable"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,3086,The code will add two operands to the instruction pbclrMI using the two variables immediate and registr.
LLVM,RISCV,3087,pbclrMI.addOperand(MI.getOperand(registr+1))
LLVM,RISCV,3088,"The next statement will be: ""if (imm2 + imm3 <= <NUM_LIT>) { MachineInstrBuilder newMI = BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(unsign ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>)); newMI.addOperand(MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)); newMI.addOperand(MI.getOperand(src1_pos)); newMI.addImm(<NUM_LIT> - imm2 - imm3); newMI.addImm(imm3); } else { MachineInstrBuilder newMI = BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get"
LLVM,RISCV,3089,"newMI . addOperand ( MI . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) ) ;
newMI.addImm(imm2 + imm3 - <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3090,"</s>

Return NULL."
LLVM,RISCV,3091,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the variables and constants being used in the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3092,"}

The next statement could be something related to creating a Virtual Register (VReg) and adding it to the basic block (BB) and/or copying a target instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,3093,"case 'f' : if ( Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) ) return std :: make_pair ( <NUM_LIT> , & <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3094,"This code does not follow a standard coding format and is not complete. As such, it is not possible to predict the next statement. It appears to be a series of function calls, but without knowing the specific function definitions or variables being used, it is impossible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3095,"</s>


<std::cout << ""Code execution completed."" </std>"
LLVM,RISCV,3096,"}

The next statement would likely be another case statement, since the code snippet is currently inside a switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3097,unsigned new_var = pred & succ;
LLVM,RISCV,3098,"</s>

The code snippet is creating a new variable to store the values from a register, and is storing that value in memory."
LLVM,RISCV,3099,RetOps.push_back(Glue);
LLVM,RISCV,3100,The next statement is likely to be a closing curly brace "}". This signals the end of the function and concludes the code snippet shown.
LLVM,RISCV,3101,It is not possible to predict as this code snippet does not provide enough information about the language or context.
LLVM,RISCV,3102,"""Prefix"" is assigned a new value, which is a substring of the string ""C"" starting from index ""B"" and ending at index ""I-1""."
LLVM,RISCV,3103,if ( VT == MVT::Other ) VT = (Prefix == "lo" || Prefix == "hi") ? MVT::i32 : MVT::i64; RC = getRegClassFor(VT);
LLVM,RISCV,3104,"Reg . changeToRegister ( C . get ( ) , <STR_LIT> , false ) ;

The code could potentially continue with more if statements or it could potentially execute some other code inside the innermost if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3105,"DAG . computeKnownBits ( Op -> getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) , Known3 , Depth + <NUM_LIT> ) ; Known . Zero &= Known3 . Zero ; Known . One &= Known3 . One ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3106,<s> Op -> getOperand (<NUM_LIT + 1>)
LLVM,RISCV,3107,"The next statement in the code snippet will likely be a closing curly brace, ending the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3108,"return lowerSETVLX ( Op , DAG );
There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be another case statement or a closing bracket."
LLVM,RISCV,3109,The next statement could be a "break" or "continue" statement as the current switch statement does not have a default case or any other cases after the last one specified.
LLVM,RISCV,3110,"return lowerFRAMEADDJUST ( Op , DAG );

case <STR_LIT> : return lowerSTACKSAVE ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3111,"SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::ADD, DL, ResultVTs, Op, Op);"
LLVM,RISCV,3112,"RegisterSDNode *New = DAG.getRegister(XLenVT, /*Regnum=*/0);

New->setNodeId(ISD::REGISTER);"
LLVM,RISCV,3113,return SDValue();
LLVM,RISCV,3114,"} else if (ElemVT == MVT::i1) { SDValue MaskVal = Op.getOperand(1); return DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, VT, MaskVal, DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), Op.getOperand(0));"
LLVM,RISCV,3115,"<ISA_LIT> - >addInstr ( MIB ) 

MIB.addImm(<ISA_LIT>|TSTI|)"
LLVM,RISCV,3116,The next statement would likely involve using the constant values SEW and VLMul to perform a calculation or operation on the MachineFunction or TargetInstrInfo.
LLVM,RISCV,3117,"llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ; case <STR_LIT> : if ( <STR_LIT> ) return Move.<VREG> Code

This code snippet does not have enough information to predict the next statement. It depends on the values of MI, Subtarget, BB, and <VREG>. These values are not given and could vary, so it is difficult to determine the exact next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3118,"}
The next statement would be:

return addVSetSEW(MI, BB, VLIndex, SEWIndex, WritesElement0);"
LLVM,RISCV,3119,"return (
    VT.isVector() ) ? 
    getPointerTy(DL) :
    Subtarget.hasStdExtV() ? 
    <STR_LIT>(<STR_LIT>, VT.getVectorElementCount()) :
    VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();"
LLVM,RISCV,3120,"return GetVectorRegisterType(VT, DL, VT.getVectorElementCount());"
LLVM,RISCV,3121,"} } }

unsigned IntNo = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Op . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> + 1 ) ) -> getZExtValue ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3122,"The code is checking the value type of a ScalarOp and if it meets certain conditions, a new SDValue will be created and returned. The next statement could be to perform operations on this new SDValue, or to handle the situation where the conditions are not met."
LLVM,RISCV,3123,"The next statement would be to return the result of the getNode function, passing in the value of <STR_LIT> as the first argument, the value of DL as the second argument, the value of Op->getVTList() as the third argument, and the value of Operands as the fourth argument."
LLVM,RISCV,3124,"return lowerUINT_TO_FP ( Op , DAG ) ;

<STR_LIT> : return CustomLowering ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3125,"assert ( ( ( ISD < <STR_LIT> ) << NUM_LIT> ( Hi ) && ! ( Lo != SDValue ( <NUM_LIT>  , <STR_LIT> ) ) )


No prediction can be made since the code is incomplete."
LLVM,RISCV,3126,"Lo = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VecVT, Lo, Zero);"
LLVM,RISCV,3127,"Possible output:

The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3128,if ( MVT :: isInteger
LLVM,RISCV,3129,return <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3130,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3131,"</s>

return false ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3132,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3133,"} </s>

If the instruction��s type is not a vector type or if the Subtarget does not have vector instructions, this function will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,3134,"Value = DAG . getNode ( GVA , DL , VA . getValVT ( ) , Value ) ;

The next statement would be:

Value = DAG .getNode (CVA, DL, VA.getValVT(), Value);"
LLVM,RISCV,3135,DAG.getValType(VA.getLocVT())
LLVM,RISCV,3136,"The next statement will be ""default: return emitRequest ( MI , MBB ) ;""."
LLVM,RISCV,3137,break;
LLVM,RISCV,3138,"OutChains . push_back ( DAG . getCopyFromReg ( Chain , LLVM
OutChains.push_back(DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, LLVM)"
LLVM,RISCV,3139,"return DAG . getNode ( <NUM_LIT> , MVT :: Other , { Chain , Addr } ) ; 

The predict next statement is: return DAG . getNode ( ISD :: VASTART , MVT :: Other , { Chain , Addr } ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3140,The next statement will be "if ( IsRet ) ArgTy = FType -> getReturnType ( ) ;".
LLVM,RISCV,3141,<STR_LIT>Unreachable statement executed.<STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,3142,"The next statement is ""State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getMem ( ValNo , ValVT , StackOffset , LocVT , LocInfo ) ) ; return false ; } if ( ! State . AllocateReg ( ArgGPRs ) )"""
LLVM,RISCV,3143,"State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getMem ( ValNo2 , ValVT2 , State . AllocateStack ( XLenInBytes , StackAlign ) , LocVT2 , CCValAssign :: Full ) ) ; return false ; }</s>

The code snippet will return false if a register is not allocated successfully for ArgGPRs and ValNo2 allocations, and will add ValNo2 to the State stack if a register is allocated."
LLVM,RISCV,3144,"break ;
It would be the end of the code snippet, so there would be no more statements."
LLVM,RISCV,3145,"Val = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, DL, VA.getValVT(), Val);"
LLVM,RISCV,3146,"c 
 in the switch case CCValAssign :: BCvt, create a node of <STR_LIT> with the given variables and assign it to Val. After that, the switch case statement is terminated."
LLVM,RISCV,3147,"""Create a fence with the given ordering using the builder."""
LLVM,RISCV,3148,"if (XLen == {NUM_LIT}) {
	Result = Builder.CreateTrunc(Result, Builder.getInt32Ty());
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3149,"Function *MaskedCmpXchg = Builder.CreateCall(MaskedCmpXchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask});"
LLVM,RISCV,3150,"If the conditions of the if statement are not met, the code will execute the else statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3151,">

Since no definition or previous code is given, it is difficult to accurately predict the next statement. However, based on the given code, the most likely next statement would be the declaration and initialization of another MachineMemOperand object, followed by a call to the eraseFromParent() method and possibly a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3152,else return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,3153,The next statement is return Builder.CreateFence(AtomicOrdering::Release);
LLVM,RISCV,3154,"case AtomicRMWInst :: Max : return <STR_LIT> ; case AtomicRMWInst :: Min : return <STR_LIT> ; case AtomicRMWInst :: UMax

<STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,3155,The next statement will be a return statement for one of the cases listed in the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3156,"return std::make_pair(llvm::ARM::R0, &PPC::G8RCRegClass);"
LLVM,RISCV,3157,"} 

The next statement would likely be a return statement that returns the result of applying the switch case to the constraint."
LLVM,RISCV,3158,The next statement will be "}" to close the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3159,"""?=

""return VT;"
LLVM,RISCV,3160,"return <STR_LIT> ;
The next statement would most likely be a ""break"" or ""default"" statement, indicating the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3161,"</s>

The next statement would likely be another case statement, followed by a return statement with a string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,3162,"</s>

No more statements to predict."
LLVM,RISCV,3163,if (IsCallerStructRet && !IsCalleeStructRet) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3164,"If the scale is not equal to <NUM_LIT>, the next statement would be to return false."
LLVM,RISCV,3165,"if (Imm > (1 << 63)) 
  return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3166,"}

This function checks whether it is cheaper to perform a sign extension operation from a smaller sized value to a larger sized value in a 64-bit environment, using the specific source and destination types."
LLVM,RISCV,3167,"</s>


return (SrcVT.getSizeInBits() > DstVT.getSizeInBits());"
LLVM,RISCV,3168,"This code snippet checks the compatibility of two types, SrcVT and DstVT, and if they are not compatible, it will return false. After that, it will calculate and compare the sizes of both types, and return true if they are equal. The next statement will most likely be a closing bracket or a semicolon to end the current function or statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3169,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3170,"None

break"
LLVM,RISCV,3171,"else if ( auto * C = dyn_cast < ConstantFP < Duty cycle / Mining fee = Low> ( Val ) const {

{return false;}"
LLVM,RISCV,3172,"The next statement will be creating a new SDValue representing a call to the DAG's getMachineNode function, with the arguments <STR_LIT>, DL, Ty, and BAHi, and assigning it to the variable MNHi."
LLVM,RISCV,3173,"VARNEXT

ArrayRef<MCPhysReg> ArgRegs = makeArrayRef(ArgGPRs);"
LLVM,RISCV,3174,"ArgRegs [ I ] = -1 ; }




VaArgOffset = - VarArgsSaveSize ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3175,"FrameAddr = DAG.getLoad(VT, DL, DAG.getEntryNode(), Ptr, MachinePointerInfo());"
LLVM,RISCV,3176,unsigned Depth = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(3))->getZExtValue();
LLVM,RISCV,3177,SDValue Result = MNLo
LLVM,RISCV,3178,The next statement will return MNLo.
LLVM,RISCV,3179,"return lowerVACOPY ( Op , DAG ) ;

next statement: case <STR_LIT> : return lowerVASTART ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3180,"SDValue Undef = DAG . getUNDEF ( VT ) ; EVT VT

= Op.getValueType() ; SDLoc DL(Op) ; unsigned Depth = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>))->getZExtValue() ; if (Depth) { int Off = -XLenInBytes ; SDValue FrameAddr = lowerFRAMEADDR(Op, DAG) ; SDValue Undef = DAG.getUNDEF(VT) ; EVT VT = FrameAddr.getValueType();"
LLVM,RISCV,3181,The next statement will likely be a return statement with a call to the DAG.getCopyFromReg function.
LLVM,RISCV,3182,"return DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, VTs, LHS, RHS, TargetCC);"
LLVM,RISCV,3183,"The code will return an instance of a Store node, using the operand at index <NUM_LIT> of the ""Op"" object, the <NUM_LIT> index of the ""Op"" object, the ""FI"" object, and MachinePointerInfo, which is initialized with the ""SV"" object obtained by casting the <SrcValueSDNode> object at the <NUM_LIT> index of the ""Op"" object."
LLVM,RISCV,3184,return SDValue::uninitialized();
LLVM,RISCV,3185,There is not enough information to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context of the code and the values of the variables.
LLVM,RISCV,3186,"<STR_LIT>

if (Subtarget.hasStdExtM() && isVariableSDivUDivURem(Src)) {
  return DCI.CombineTo(N, DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, N->getValueType(0), N, N));
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3187,I don't think I can predict the next statement without seeing more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3188,"}
The next statement will be the closing curly brace for the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3189,"If (Size == <NUM_LIT>) {
  return AtomicExpansionKind::MaskedIntrinsic;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3190,std::cout << "The next statement will be an if statement checking if CI is null."
LLVM,RISCV,3191,"</s>

Size is not a known variable in this code snippet and it is not clear what value is being compared to <NUM_LIT> twice."
LLVM,RISCV,3192,"Hi = DAG . getCopyFromReg ( Chain , DL , HiVReg , <STR_LIT> ) ;
The next statement is: Hi = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, DL, HiVReg, <STR_LIT>)."
LLVM,RISCV,3193,MFI.setStackAlignment(PtrVT);
LLVM,RISCV,3194,"This code snippet is incomplete and therefore it is difficult to predict the exact next statement. However, based on the provided information, it is likely that the code will continue to perform some load operation and then return a value."
LLVM,RISCV,3195,"I'm sorry, there is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could be anything from a print statement to another function call or conditional statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3196,"The next statement could be something along the lines of:
- // execute the tables computation
- for (int i = 0; i < tables.size(); i++) { /* do something with the tables */ }"
LLVM,RISCV,3197,The next statement would most likely be the opening curly brace for the constructor function.
LLVM,RISCV,3198,"}</s>

The code will return the value of the variable ""CalleeSavedStackSize"" as an unsigned integer."
LLVM,RISCV,3199,"</s>

}"
LLVM,RISCV,3200,"}

uint64_t offset


The next statement will return the value of the variable ""RVVPadding"" as a 64-bit unsigned integer."
LLVM,RISCV,3201,"</s>

I am not able to complete the prediction as I do not have access to the entire code snippet. The next statement could be anything depending on the context of the code and what the RVVStackAlign variable represents."
LLVM,RISCV,3202,There is not enough information to predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could be anything from a return statement to another function call.
LLVM,RISCV,3203,"<s> This function will take two arguments, a YAML input/output object (YamlIO) and a reference to a MachineFunctionInfo object (MFI), and perform some sort of mapping operation."
LLVM,RISCV,3204,"}

CalleeSavedStackSize will be set to the value of Size."
LLVM,RISCV,3205,"<br>
 
 ""Set the Vector-Privileged registers alignment on the stack to the specified align value."""
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,3206,"</s>
 
The next statement could involve assigning a value or manipulating the newly defined RVVStackSize variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3207,Error: the code is missing a closing parenthesis ')' at the end.
LLVM,RISCV,3208,We cannot use save/restore library calls.
LLVM,RISCV,3209,"return_ppc ();
The <s> bool usealtivec ( ) const { return_true (); }"
LLVM,RISCV,3210,"""The next statement executes the MF.getFrameInfo() function."""
LLVM,RISCV,3211,throw new error
LLVM,RISCV,3212,"}

The next statement could be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3213,"</s>
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3214,"return MF.getProperties().getNextFrameIndex(); }

The next statement is ""return MF.getProperties().getNextFrameIndex();""."
LLVM,RISCV,3215,"""Assert that FI is equal to either EhDataRegFI[<NUM_LIT>] or EhDataRegFI[<NUM_LIT>] in order for the statement to return true."""
LLVM,RISCV,3216,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code or understanding the context in which it is being used.
LLVM,RISCV,3217,"</s>

return HwlpBasicBlocks.entry();"
LLVM,RISCV,3218,The BB basic block has been successfully inserted into the HwlpBasicBlocks collection.
LLVM,RISCV,3219,"</s>

<ISA_LIT>// Code goes here. </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3220,return MF.getInfo();
LLVM,RISCV,3221,"}</s>

It can't be predicted as it is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,3222,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,3223,"</s>

This snippet ends with a return statement that returns the variable ""CallsEhReturn""."
LLVM,RISCV,3224,"return manipulatesSP;
} 

Next, we cannot predict the next statement as it depends on how this code snippet will be used or integrated into a larger program. It could potentially be followed by other functions or statements, or it could be the last statement in a class definition."
LLVM,RISCV,3225,"return manipulatesSP ;

There is not enough context to predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could continue with more return statements, or it could move on to a new section of code."
LLVM,RISCV,3226,"</s>

This code snippet is returning a variable called SavedGPRFrameSize. The next statement might be to assign this variable to another variable or to use it in a calculation or comparison."
LLVM,RISCV,3227,"}

Next, this code snippet is likely to return the value of the variable VarArgsFirstFPR."
LLVM,RISCV,3228,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code and understanding the context.
LLVM,RISCV,3229,"Sorry, I cannot accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. Can you please provide the full code or a description of what the code is supposed to do?"
LLVM,RISCV,3230,"</s>

It is likely that the code snippet is part of a function. So next statement might be:
int main() {  }"
LLVM,RISCV,3231,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict the next statement without additional context. Please provide more information."
LLVM,RISCV,3232,The next statement is likely setting the value for the variable "ManipulatesSP" to false.
LLVM,RISCV,3233,"This code snippet defines a <ISA_LIT>FunctionInfo object to store information about the MachineFunction MF, such as the size and location of saved GPRs, as well as information about variable arguments and register frame indices."
LLVM,RISCV,3234,The code will assign the value of the variable "ceret" to the variable "CallsEhReturn".
LLVM,RISCV,3235,"There isn't enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could potentially be a continuation of the code, such as defining the variable ""ceret"" or using it in an operation."
LLVM,RISCV,3236,"</s><s>  if (//

if ( HasByval ) {"
LLVM,RISCV,3237,"}</s>

This code snippet defines a function named ""setHighSavedGPR"" which takes in an unsigned integer parameter named ""Reg"". Within the function, the global variable ""HighSavedGPR"" is set to the value of the ""Reg"" parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,3238,"</s>


return Reg;"
LLVM,RISCV,3239,"counter1 ++; <s>

The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the variable MSP and performs some manipulation on it based on the conditions. For example:

if (MSP == true) {
    // perform some manipulation
} else {
    // perform different manipulation
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3240,"}


This code snippet does not contain any more statements. It is the end of the function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,3241,"</s

}"
LLVM,RISCV,3242,"</s>

""// Calculate the size of the GPR frame in bytes and save it"""
LLVM,RISCV,3243,return FPR;
LLVM,RISCV,3244,VarArgsFirstGPR = VarArgsFirstGPR + 1 ;
LLVM,RISCV,3245,"The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function declaration, followed by a comment describing the purpose of the function or a block of code implementing the functionality of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3246,The next statement would be a curly brace indicating the start of the function's body.
LLVM,RISCV,3247,"</s>

This code snippet creates a new stack object with a size of <NUM_LIT> and offset of <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,3248,MF.getFrameInfo().ensureMaxAlignment(Align);
LLVM,RISCV,3249,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context. The code snippet provided is a partial statement and does not provide enough information to infer the following statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3250,"</s>

X.nextVarArgsFrameIndex = yamlMFI.X.nextVarArgsFrameIndex;"
LLVM,RISCV,3251,return;
LLVM,RISCV,3252,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be an opening brace ""{"" indicating the start of a code block."
LLVM,RISCV,3253,"null }

the next statement would assign the machine function MF"
LLVM,RISCV,3254,"</s>

Next, 
""value = VarArgsFrameIndex[index];"""
LLVM,RISCV,3255,"}</s>

The code snippet does not contain any branching statements, so the next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3256,"</s>

There is no additional code snippet provided, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3257,RCToScavenge = & <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3258,return CompressedLDSTOffsetMaskTable[Opcode & 15];
LLVM,RISCV,3259,The next statement is likely a return statement that returns the result of the function. It may also include other statements to complete the function body.
LLVM,RISCV,3260,"}</s>

""Create a new instance of the MakeCompressibleOpt class and return it as a FunctionPass."""
LLVM,RISCV,3261,"</s>

return Offset + Opcode;"
LLVM,RISCV,3262,return Offset >> ((Opcode - 1) & 0x1f);
LLVM,RISCV,3263,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and purpose of the code snippet. However, it is likely that the code will continue performing a task related to compressing instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,3264,"(""-------------------------------------------

Based on the given code, the next statement could be:
- A conditional statement to check if the machine instruction is a load or store instruction and if the offset is compressible.
- If the conditions are met, a statement to get the immediate operand and check if it is an immediate value.
- If not, the code returns a Pair of a string and a number.
- Otherwise, the code sets the offset and register values for compression and returns a Pair of a register and a number."
LLVM,RISCV,3265,"}
return RegImmPair (Base, NewBaseAdjust)"
LLVM,RISCV,3266,"throw new Exception(""isCompressedReg() not implemented"");
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3267,The code snippet does not have enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The next statement could be any valid code related to the function isCompressedReg.
LLVM,RISCV,3268,"if (Opcode == LOAD) {
  // do something
} 

Next statement: ""else if (Opcode == STORE) {"""
LLVM,RISCV,3269,"The next statement could be a condition check on the opcode variable, or a function call using the STI variable and passing in the Opcode variable as an argument."
LLVM,RISCV,3270,"</s>

The next statement will likely be another condition or check related to the ""Opcode"" variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3271,"return <NUM_LIT>

The next statement of this code snippet will be another case statement or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3272,"The next statement could be a function definition for the MakeCompressibleOpt function, including any necessary parameters or return values."
LLVM,RISCV,3273,"The code snippet is incomplete and it is not possible to predict the next statement. However, based on the context, it is likely that the code snippet is part of a loop and the next statement could be another iteration or the end of the loop."
LLVM,RISCV,3274,assert (isCompressibleLoad(MI));
LLVM,RISCV,3275,return Opc + Imm;
LLVM,RISCV,3276,"</s>

return Imm(Opc,"
LLVM,RISCV,3277,"The next statement will likely be a conditional statement, as indicated by the ""if"" keyword and parentheses in the code snippet. It is possible that the condition of the if statement will use the variable Lo12."
LLVM,RISCV,3278,"The next statement is: Res.push_back(Inst(SLT, ShiftAmount));"
LLVM,RISCV,3279,"The code will check if the condition (LeadingZeros == <NUM_LIT> && ActiveFeatures [ <STR_LIT> ]) is true, and if so, it will perform the following actions:

1. Set the variable LeadingOnesVal to the result of Val OR the maskLeadingOnes < uint64_t > (LeadingZeros).
2. Clear the contents of TmpSeq.
3. Call the function generateInstSeqImpl with the parameters LeadingOnesVal, ActiveFeatures, and TmpSeq.
4. Append a statement to TmpSeq that pushes the values <STR_LIT> and <NUM"
LLVM,RISCV,3280,"Pushing the value of AddiOpc and Lo12 to Res, followed by returning the result."
LLVM,RISCV,3281,"}

The code snippet will return the variable 'Res'."
LLVM,RISCV,3282,"An if statement will be executed, setting the variable Res to the value of TmpSeq if TmpSeq is smaller in size than Res. After this, TmpSeq is cleared and the function generateInstSeqImpl is called with Val, IsRV64, and TmpSeq as parameters. Finally, TmpSeq will have another value pushed back into it."
LLVM,RISCV,3283,"Res . push_back ( <STR_LIT> ( <NUM_LIT> , Lo12 ) ) ; }

""Res.push_back(<STR_LIT>(<STR_LIT>, Lo12));"""
LLVM,RISCV,3284,"MatSeq.execute(); // Executes the generated instruction sequence corresponding to the signed extended value of Chunk (assumed to be an integer) and a boolean flag IsRV64 indicating 64-bit instruction support, and saves the result into the variable InstSeq"
LLVM,RISCV,3285,"/* some code here */
    }

 ShiftVal += PlatRegSize"
LLVM,RISCV,3286,if ( Res
LLVM,RISCV,3287,"Next, the if statement will check if Hi20 is not equal to zero. If it is not, it will push back a new instruction object with the opcode ""add"" and the value of Hi20. After that, the next if statement will check if Lo12 is not equal to zero or if Hi20 is equal to 1. If either of these conditions is met, a new instruction object will be pushed back with the opcode ""add"" and the value of Lo12. Finally, the code will return and the function will end."
LLVM,RISCV,3288,The next statement will check if Instr.Imm is an integer less than <NUM_LIT> and assign the result to the variable Compressed.
LLVM,RISCV,3289,"The next statement is: generateInstSeq(Lo12, IsRV64, Res);"
LLVM,RISCV,3290,"The next statement will be ""Res.push_back( Inst( <STR_LIT> , Hi20 ) )""."
LLVM,RISCV,3291,MatSeq.push_back(Chunk);
LLVM,RISCV,3292,"""MatSeq.push_back(Chunk)"""
LLVM,RISCV,3293,return <NUM_LIT> - UpperTrailingOnes ;
LLVM,RISCV,3294,<NUM_LIT> - UpperTrailingOnes
LLVM,RISCV,3295,"generateInstSeqImpl ( Val / Div , ActiveFeatures , TmpSeq ) ; TmpSeq . push_back ( <STR_LIT> ( Opc , <NUM_LIT> ) ) ; if ( TmpSeq . size ( ) < Res . size ( ) ) Res = TmpSeq ; }

The if statement evaluates if the size of Res is greater than <NUM_LIT> and if ActiveFeatures[<STR_LIT>] evaluates to true."
LLVM,RISCV,3296,"The next statement will be: 
""return Res;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3297,The next statement would be "return Cost ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3298,The next statement will be an if statement checking the value of "Compressed".
LLVM,RISCV,3299,"""assert ( ActiveFeatures [ \""and\"" ] && \""or\"" ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3300,An assertion will be checked that returns true if the statement is true.
LLVM,RISCV,3301,"generateInstSeqImpl ( Val , ActiveFeatures , TmpSeq ) ; TmpSeq . push_back ( <STR_LIT> ( Opc , Div ) ) ; if ( TmpSeq . size ( ) < Res . size ( ) ) Res"
LLVM,RISCV,3302,Unsigned will be set to true.
LLVM,RISCV,3303,"break ; } if ( Compressed ) return Cost *
<NUM_LIT>;

<NUM_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,3304,"if ( Opc == <NUM_LIT> ) { Div |= <NUM_LIT> ; }
if (Opc > <NUM_LIT>) {
  unsigned Bit = countTrailingZeros(Hi);
  TmpSeq.push_back(<STR_LIT>(Opc, Bit + <NUM_LIT>));
  Hi &= ~(<NUM_LIT> << Bit);
  while (Hi != <NUM_LIT>) {
    unsigned Bit = countTrailingZeros(Hi);
    TmpSeq.push_back(<STR_LIT>(Opc, Bit + <NUM_LIT>));
    Hi &= ~"
LLVM,RISCV,3305,The next statement is: assert ( IsRV64 && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3306,"case <STR_LIT> : Compressed = false ; } </s>


The code will check the value of Instr.Opc and set the value of Compressed accordingly."
LLVM,RISCV,3307,"The next statement will be ""return std::max(0, Cost);"""
LLVM,RISCV,3308,"</s>

The next statement would be to close the for loop by using ""}"""
LLVM,RISCV,3309,The code will return the value of Infos[Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind] in the function <ISA_LIT>MCAsmBackend :: applyFixup.
LLVM,RISCV,3310,The next statement will assign the relaxed opcode to the variable "Opcode" using the getRelaxedOpcode function with the instruction's original opcode as an input.
LLVM,RISCV,3311,"return new ISA_MCMAsmBackend(T, MRI, TT, CPU);"
LLVM,RISCV,3312,"Value <<= <NUM_LIT> ; ""Next statement: const MCFixup &res = Fixup;""


The next statement would be: return res;"
LLVM,RISCV,3313,"<s>
Fixup = Fixup + 1;"
LLVM,RISCV,3314,The return statement will check if the extracted value from the fixup is a 16-bit integer and return a boolean value.
LLVM,RISCV,3315,"</s>

assert ( Opcode && <STR_LIT> ) ; Res = Inst ; Res . setOpcode ( Opcode ) ;
Res.setOperand(Operand, Idx);"
LLVM,RISCV,3316,This code snippet creates an MCAsmBackend object and assigns the value of osABI to the OSABI member variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3317,"<END> This code snippet defines the MCAsmBackend class and sets the OSABI variable to the input value, osABI."
LLVM,RISCV,3318,return;
LLVM,RISCV,3319,IncludeDebugInfo = true ;
LLVM,RISCV,3320,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,3321,CommentString = "This code snippet initializes several variables."
LLVM,RISCV,3322,<s> Data64bitsDirective = <STR_LIT> ; Endianness = LittleEndian
LLVM,RISCV,3323,"// Do nothing. This is just a placeholder function.

    // End of code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,3324,"</s>


The next statement will be a closing curly brace (})."
LLVM,RISCV,3325,No prediction can be made as this code snippet is missing necessary information.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,3326,UniqueIdentifier = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3327,Text: "SupportsDebugInformation is set to true."
LLVM,RISCV,3328,<CALL_LIT>initFeatures ( TT ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3329,"</s>

<return MCAsmInfo(TT);>"
LLVM,RISCV,3330,"// Sets CodePointerSize and CalleeSaveStackSlotSize to either <NUM_LIT> or <NUM_LIT>, depending on whether the architecture is 64-bit or not

CodePointerSize = TT.isArch64Bit() ? 8 : 4;"
LLVM,RISCV,3331,"</s>

AdditionalFlagsDirective = <code> After <s> Data64bitsDirective = <STR_LIT> ; </s>

SupportsPositionIndependentCode = true ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3332,TmpInst = MCInstBuilder ( <STR_LIT> ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) . addReg ( Ra ) . addImm ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3333,"MI . getOperand ( i + <NUM_LIT> ) . setImm ( <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT> ) ; }

The next statement will be ""MI.getOperand(i + 1).setImm(0)""."
LLVM,RISCV,3334,"}
The next statement will assert that the FixupKind is not equal to a certain string, and that the Fixups vector will be pushed back with an MCFixup created using the current FixupKind, MCNumFixups and the MI location."
LLVM,RISCV,3335,"The next statement could be ""break;"" or it could be another case in the switch statement, depending on the value of ""Size""."
LLVM,RISCV,3336,"This code appears to be a part of a larger code snippet for a programming language or system. Without further context, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3337,"uint16_t Bits = getBinaryCodeForInstr ( MI , Fixups , STI ) ;

The next statement is a case statement with a Size of <NUM_LIT>, where the uint16_t Bits variable is used to write binary code for the instruction to the output stream using the <STR_LIT>::write method."
LLVM,RISCV,3338,The next statement could be a comment or a blank line.
LLVM,RISCV,3339,"Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(<NUM_LIT>, Dummy, MCFixupKind(<STR_LIT>), MI.getLoc()));"
LLVM,RISCV,3340,The next statement would be: Binary = MI.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getImm();
LLVM,RISCV,3341,FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3342,"Binary = getBinaryCodeForInstr ( TmpInst , Fixups , STI ) ; <STR_LIT> :: write ( OS , Binary , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3343,The next statement would be "return;" since the code starts with a check for the opcode being either one of three specific values and then proceeds to expand the function call and update the MCNumEmitted variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3344,"break ; }

The next statement would be ""case <NUM_LIT>: break;""."
LLVM,RISCV,3345,"}

""<STR_LIT> if (MI.getOpcode() == <STR_LIT>) { TmpInst.setOpcode(<STR_LIT>)}"""
LLVM,RISCV,3346,"All available ISA instructions will be sent to the MCCodeEmitter constructor, along with the context and MCII."
LLVM,RISCV,3347,"}
The next statement is likely to be a new case in the switch statement that handles a different instruction size."
LLVM,RISCV,3348,"<STR_LIT>
write an unsigned 8-bit value to the output stream and break out of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3349,"The assert statement is checking that SrcSymbol is an expression of type <ISA_LIT>MCExpr and that the expression's kind is VK_<ISA_LIT>_TPREL_ADD . This is then followed by the line: Fixups.push_back( MCFixup:: create(<NUM_LIT>, Expr, MCFixupKind(<STR_LIT>), MI.getLoc() ) ) ;, which is creating a new MCFixup object and adding it to the Fixups <ISA_LIT> list."
LLVM,RISCV,3350,The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement or a return statement that checks the values of the variables in the previous lines of code and returns a specific value or executes a specific set of instructions based on those values.
LLVM,RISCV,3351,"The code snippet predicts the next statement is Binary = getBinaryCodeForInstr (TmpInst, Fixups, STI)."
LLVM,RISCV,3352,The next statement could be either TmpInst = MCInstBuilder(<STR_LIT>).addReg(<STR_LIT>).addReg(Ra).addImm(<NUM_LIT>) ; or TmpInst = MCInstBuilder(<STR_LIT>).addReg(Ra).addReg(Ra).addImm(<NUM_LIT>) ; depending on the conditional statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3353,"FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ; }

FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3354,case <STR_LIT>: return <NUM_LIT>;
LLVM,RISCV,3355,"}

<END_STMT> The MCNumEmitted variable is incremented by one."
LLVM,RISCV,3356,"It is likely that the next statement will be to close the function or block that the previous statements were in, as the code snippet appears to represent a complete function or block."
LLVM,RISCV,3357,"FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ; } 

The next statement will be:
assert(Kind == MCExpr::Constant);"
LLVM,RISCV,3358,<e> }
LLVM,RISCV,3359,"<\s>

The next statement will be the closing curly brace to end the MCCodeEmitter constructor."
LLVM,RISCV,3360,The next statement of this code snippet would be "Size = 0;" or "Size++;"
LLVM,RISCV,3361,"}

FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3362,"If MI.getOpcode() evaluates to STR_LIT and the previous if statement is not true, then it will expandAddTPRel and add <NUM_LIT> to MCNumEmitted before returning."
LLVM,RISCV,3363,"uint16_t Bits = unsigned ( getBinaryCodeForInstr ( MI , Fixups , STI ) ) ; <STR_LIT> :: write < uint16_t > ("
LLVM,RISCV,3364,"break ; <s>

The next statement would be:

<STR_LIT> return MIFrm == <STR_LIT> ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3365,FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3366,"FixupKind = <STR_LIT> ; }

llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3367,"if ( is

Assert ( FixupKind != <STR_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ) ; Fixups . push_back ( MCFixup :: create ( <NUM_LIT> , Expr , MCFixupKind ( FixupKind ) , MI . getLoc ( ) ) ) ; ++ MCNumFixups ; if ( EnableRelax && RelaxCandidate ) { const <ISA_LIT>Expr * Dummy = <ISA_LIT>Expr :: create ( <NUM_LIT> , Ctx ) ; if (is
<ISA_LIT>Expr::CompleteRelaxIntermVal(&MI"
LLVM,RISCV,3368,"}

The next statement would likely be an if statement, since it is checking for different conditions using the variable ""FixupKind"". It is also possible that there could be a switch statement or another logical operator."
LLVM,RISCV,3369,"<STR_LIT> :: write ( OS , Binary , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3370,"Binary = getBinaryCodeForInstr (TmpInst, Fixups, STI); <STR_LIT> :: write (OS, Binary, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3371,"An assert statement will be executed, checking that FixupKind is not equal to <STR_LIT> and <STR_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,3372,case <MPLZ_LIT> : FixupKind = <MPLZ_LIT> ; break ;
LLVM,RISCV,3373,"The next statement will be:

}"
LLVM,RISCV,3374,"return new ISA_LITMCCodeEmitter(MCII, MRI, Ctx);"
LLVM,RISCV,3375,There is no next statement in this code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3376,**"Decrease the value of 'I' by 1"**
LLVM,RISCV,3377,It will return a MCFixup created with the given data.
LLVM,RISCV,3378,return <NUM_LIT>;
LLVM,RISCV,3379,"Return the call encoding of the given MCInst, at the specified operand index, along with any associated fixups."
LLVM,RISCV,3380,return MO.getImm() << NUM_LIT;
LLVM,RISCV,3381,"If (MO.isExpr()) {
 return 0;
}

This code will check if the operand at index OpNum in the given MCInst is an expression and return 0 if it is."
LLVM,RISCV,3382,"The next statement is:
if ( MO .isReg ( ) ) return Ctx . getRegisterInfo ( ) -> getRegUnit ( MO . getReg ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3383,"else if ( MO . isImm ( ) ) return MO . getImm ( ) ;

else if ( MO . isExpr ( ) ) return MO . getExpr ( ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3384,return MO.getImm() << <NUM_LIT> << <NUM_LIT>;
LLVM,RISCV,3385,"</s>

MO . getImm(current value) << <NUM_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,3386,"</s>

A possible prediction could be:

<div>if (MO.isImm())
  return MO.getImm();
else
  return 0;</div>"
LLVM,RISCV,3387,"return MCBinaryExpr::createAdd(Expr, MCConstantExpr::create(Offset, true), Ctx);"
LLVM,RISCV,3388,"if (Expr) {
   const MCExpr *NextExpr = Expr->getNext();
   if(NextExpr) {
      return NextExpr->getValue(); //Assuming getValue() returns the value of the expression.
   }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3389,"</s>

The next statement will be:
return finishEncodingInstruction(N,Address,getCurBuffer());"
LLVM,RISCV,3390,"This code snippet defines a class called MCCodeEmitter that takes in a constant reference to an MCInstrInfo object and an MCContext object as parameters. It also initializes two member variables, MCII and Ctx, with the corresponding parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,3391,"The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function, or possibly another function declaration or expression. It ultimately depends on the code within the curly braces of the current function."
LLVM,RISCV,3392,"return 




the MCCodeEmitter class definition closes with a curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,3393,An increment statement is likely to follow in order to continue the loop.
LLVM,RISCV,3394,"Binary = getBinaryCodeForInstr (MI, Fixups, STI); <STR_LIT> :: write (OS, Binary, <STR_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3395,The else statement will be executed next.
LLVM,RISCV,3396,The next statement would be "Desc.getOpcode() == <NUM_LIT>."
LLVM,RISCV,3397,"Binary = getBinaryCodeForInstr(TmpInst, Fixups, STI);"
LLVM,RISCV,3398,The next statement would be an if statement checking if the variable "Desc" has a specific opcode and then setting the variable "FixupKind" to a certain value based on the conditions in the if and else statements.
LLVM,RISCV,3399,"return new <ISA_LIT>MCCodeEmitter ( Ctx , MCII ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3400,"int16_t Bits = getBinaryCodeForInstr ( MI , Fixups , STI ) ; <STR_LIT> :: write < int16_t > ( OS , Bits , <STR_LIT> ) ; break ; }

""Error: unreachable default case reached, please check code."""
LLVM,RISCV,3401,"""This code snippet uses an if-else statement to construct a temporary instruction using the MCInstBuilder class, and then calls the getBinaryCodeForInstr function to obtain the binary code for the temporary instruction. Finally, it uses the write function to write the binary code to the specified output stream."""
LLVM,RISCV,3402,"""The instruction is added to a temporary instruction builder and the binary code for the instruction is retrieved using the getBinaryCodeForInstr function. The binary code is then written to an output stream using the write function."""
LLVM,RISCV,3403,"break ; }

The code is checking the type of an expression and setting the appropriate FixupKind and RelaxCandidate values based on the expression's kind."
LLVM,RISCV,3404,"<ISA_LIT>MCInst NewMI ; NewMI . setOpcode ( <STR_LIT> ) ; NewMI . addOperand ( MI . getOperand (<NUM_LIT> ) ) ; NewMI . addOperand ( MI . getOperand (<NUM_LIT> ) ) ;

The next statement will check if the FixupKind is not equal to ""Unknown"" and ""RelaxCandidate is true""."
LLVM,RISCV,3405,The next statement will most likely be an assertion statement asserting that the result of the getImm() method is equal to a specific number and a specific string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,3406,"The next statement would be: llvm_unreachable(""Error: Expected immediate value, got other operand type"");"
LLVM,RISCV,3407,This code snippet is incomplete and does not have a clear next statement. Please provide more context or complete the code snippet to make a prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,3408,"This code snippet defines a class called ""MCCodeEmitter"" that takes in two parameters - ""MCContext"" and ""MCInstrInfo"" - and initializes them as ""ctx"" and ""MCII"" respectively. There is no other code in this snippet, so the next statement would likely be the end of the class definition."
LLVM,RISCV,3409,"""We will override the MCCodeEmitter with the new class."""
LLVM,RISCV,3410,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. More context or code would be needed.
LLVM,RISCV,3411,"return new ISA::MCExpr(Kind, Expr, Ctx);}</s>

Error, there is no defined ""ISA"" namespace or class for the MCExpr object."
LLVM,RISCV,3412,if ( ! Value . isInteger ( ) ) return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,3413,break;
LLVM,RISCV,3414,"The code will calculate the AUIPCOffset by getting the offset of the AUIPCSymbol, then it will call the MCValue :: get function passing in the Target's getSymA variable, a nullptr, and adding the Target's getConstant variable with the Fixup's getOffset minus the AUIPCOffset. Finally, the code will return true."
LLVM,RISCV,3415,"""return nullptr;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3416,The code will continue to check for a specific case and return a corresponding value if the case is found.
LLVM,RISCV,3417,"<ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VariantKind <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: substituteValueInPlace ( const MCExpr * <Placeholder> , MCSymbolELF const * <Placeholder> , MCStreamer & OS ) const { switch ( getVariantKindForName ( <Placeholder> ) ) { case VK_<ISA_LIT>_Invalid : report_fatal_error ( ""unsupported modifier"" ) ; case VK_<ISA_LIT>_LO : return getSubExpr ( ) -> substitute <Placeholder> ( <Placeholder> . getRange ( ) ) ; case VK_<ISA_LIT>_HI : return getSubExpr ( )"
LLVM,RISCV,3418,"The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3419,The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to end the if statement that checks for the existence of a variant kind.
LLVM,RISCV,3420,The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to end the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3421,"return NULL; }

The next statement would be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3422,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3423,The next statement could be a return statement or a conditional statement based on the value of the previously declared variable "Value".
LLVM,RISCV,3424,The next statement is "return Res".
LLVM,RISCV,3425,There are no more statements to predict as this is the last line of code in this snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3426,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3427,break;
LLVM,RISCV,3428,"case MCExpr :: SymbolRef : { const MCSymbolRefExpr & SymRef = * cast < MCSymbolRefExpr > ( Expr ) ; cast < MCSymbolELF > ( SymRef . getSymbol ( ) ) . setType ( ELF :: STT_TLS ) ; break ; } case MCExpr :: Cast : fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixupsImpl ( cast < MCCastExpr > ( Expr ) -> getSubExpr ( ) , Asm ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3429,The code snippet will continue to evaluate the expression and set the type of the symbol's TLS to STT_TLS.
LLVM,RISCV,3430,The code will return nullptr.
LLVM,RISCV,3431,"The next statement will most likely be the end of the code snippet, either a closing curly brace or an ""end"" keyword to indicate the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,3432,Type 'else' to close the first if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3433,")

OS << '=VK_<ISA_LIT>_PUSH_EAX';"
LLVM,RISCV,3434,"}
The code will return true."
LLVM,RISCV,3435,The code will end with a function call to fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixupsImpl with parameters "getSubExpr()" and "Asm".
LLVM,RISCV,3436,Offset is set to a numerical literal.
LLVM,RISCV,3437,"""Default case reached."""
LLVM,RISCV,3438,">
The next statement could include a <s> switch statement to handle the results of the StringSwitch prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,3439,"""case VK_<ISA_LIT>_CALL_PLT : return <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3440,"<EOF>

`}
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3441,"}

It will return true."
LLVM,RISCV,3442,"</s>

The next statement could be to evaluate the previous statements and return a boolean value of true or false depending on the result."
LLVM,RISCV,3443,"</s>

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,3444,"}

The next statement will be a ""case <STR_LIT>:"" statement, followed by a return statement that returns the address of the variable ""F""."
LLVM,RISCV,3445,"The next statement would likely be the end of a switch statement or function, as there are no more cases or statements following this one."
LLVM,RISCV,3446,"case VK_<ISA_LIT>_PLT : return <STR_LIT> ; } }</s>

The next statement would likely be commenting on the different cases and their respective return values."
LLVM,RISCV,3447,"case VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI :</s>

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,3448,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3449,return llvm :: FK_InlineKind ;
LLVM,RISCV,3450,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,3451,This code snippet creates a new MCExpr object with the specified VariantKind and MCExpr.
LLVM,RISCV,3452,"return MCExpr(Kind, Expr);"
LLVM,RISCV,3453,"if ( ! getSubExpr ( ) -> evaluateAsRelocatable ( Value , nullptr , nullptr ) ) return false ; if ( ! Value . isAbsolute ( ) ) return false ; return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,3454,A return statement that creates a new ISA_LITMCExpr object with the specified Kind and Expr parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,3455,"</s>

return new ( Ctx ) <ISA_LIT>MCExpr ( Kind , Expr ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3456,case VK_<ISA_LIT>_TPLT_HI21 : break ;
LLVM,RISCV,3457,"} } }


The next statement will be the ""case MCExpr :: Constant"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3458,"It is likely that the code snippet will continue with more ""case"" statements, possibly followed by a default case. These will likely all be related to <ISA_LIT> and <STR_LIT>, and will likely have different suffixes like ""_HI20"" and ""_PCREL_LO12"". Eventually, the code snippet will likely end with a ""break"" statement to exit the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3459,"There is no next statement, as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,3460,The code will return VK_<ISA_LIT>_None.
LLVM,RISCV,3461,"if (Expr) {
  // do something with Expr
}

The code will check if the variable ""Expr"" has a value, and if it does, it will perform a specific action using that value."
LLVM,RISCV,3462,case VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI20 : OS << <STR_LIT> ; break ;
LLVM,RISCV,3463,The next statement could be a "case VK_<ISA_LIT>_PCREL_HI" or "return false" depending on the value of "getKind()".
LLVM,RISCV,3464,"The next statement would be:

if (Res.isAbsolute()) return Fixup->relocateOne(Value, Layout);"
LLVM,RISCV,3465,"This code snippet appears to be evaluating whether a given fixup will force relocations and then evaluating the value of a target and checking if it is associated with the same section as the AUIPC symbol offset, and then it will return the result."
LLVM,RISCV,3466,"}
uint64_t NextAddress = DF -> getContents ( ) . slice ( Offset ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3467,"The code will continue to loop through the fixups in the current data fragment, skipping any that do not have the same offset as the value stored in ""Offset."""
LLVM,RISCV,3468,"Going back to line  <s> auto & RAB = static_cast < <ISA_LIT>AsmBackend & > ( Layout -> getAssembler ( ) . getBackend ( ) );
if (RAB.willForceRelocations()) {
return false;
<<<<<<< HEAD
}
auto * AUIPCSymbol = &AUIPCSRE -> getSymbol ();
=======
}
auto * AUIPCSymbol = &AUIPCSRE -> getSymbol ();
>>>>>>> aeb0ce52212b301f86d8ff2a582ab1cd12bce643
if (!AUIPCSymbol) {
return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3469,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3470,The next statement is "Res = evaluateAsString ( Value.getConstant() );".
LLVM,RISCV,3471,Res may or may not have a valid value depending on the input parameters.
LLVM,RISCV,3472,"Possible prediction: It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet will involve a return statement or an error handling statement, as the current line checks if a certain expression can be evaluated as a relocatable object and the next line may handle the result of this operation. It is possible that the return statement will return the result of the expression evaluation using the parameters provided, such as the layout and fixup information."
LLVM,RISCV,3473,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be anything from a variable assignment to a function call.
LLVM,RISCV,3474,"</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context about the code snippet and its purpose. The code could potentially end here, or there could be additional statements following it."
LLVM,RISCV,3475,This code snippet does not have enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It may depend on the specific implementation of the overridden function.
LLVM,RISCV,3476,"// This function fixes ELF symbols in the TLS (Thread Local Storage) fixups.


// The function will modify the MCAssembler object passed as a parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,3477,I cannot make a prediction since there is not enough context provided. Please provide more information about the code snippet.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,3478,The next statement will most likely return the value of the "Kind" variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3479,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3480,"</s>


There are no more statements."
LLVM,RISCV,3481,<STR_LIT> : VK_<ISA_LIT>_Invalid
LLVM,RISCV,3482,"The next statement is likely to perform an operation using the function getVariantKindForName, such as assigning the result to a variable or using it in a conditional statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3483,"} }

The next statement could be: ""case VK_<ISA_LIT>_NONE : return <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3484,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,3485,the next statement would be a closing bracket for the MCExpr class.
LLVM,RISCV,3486,The next statement is most likely a closing bracket or an ending of some sort to complete the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3487,return OutMI;
LLVM,RISCV,3488,"}

A break statement to end the switch case."
LLVM,RISCV,3489,The next statement would likely be a switch statement or if/else statement to handle the different possible values for the "Kind" variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3490,The code will create a MCBinaryExpr by adding the MCExpr and OffsetExpr with offset value and then assign it to the Expr variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3491,We will set the Ctx and AsmPrinter variables to the values passed in as arguments.
LLVM,RISCV,3492,"It is not possible to accurately make a prediction with the given information. The code could continue with any number of statements, depending on the specific context and purpose of the code. Additional information would be needed to make an accurate prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,3493,"The next statement will be:
else { return false ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,3494,"case MachineOperand::MO_Register:
MCOp = lowerRegisterOperand(MO, AP);
break;"
LLVM,RISCV,3495,The next statement would switch to a new case and assign a new value to the variable Kind based on the string literal <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,RISCV,3496,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3497,"The next statement of this code snippet is an if statement that checks if the condition (TSFlags & <STR_LIT>) is true and if the value of OpNo is equal to <NUM_LIT>. If this condition is met, the following statements inside the if block will be executed."
LLVM,RISCV,3498,"if ( Num != 0 ) {  

The next statement will be ""OutMI.getOperand(0).Expr = MCBinaryExpr::createAdd(OutMI.getOperand(0).Expr, MCConstantExpr::create(Num, AP))""."
LLVM,RISCV,3499,"}</s>

The next statement of this code snippet could potentially be an ""else case"" or ""default case"" statement, since the given switch statement only includes two cases. This statement would execute if the above two cases are not met."
LLVM,RISCV,3500,"The next statement will likely involve a comparison or calculation using the MCOp, AP, and MO variables."
LLVM,RISCV,3501,The next statement will likely be "break ;" since it is a default case for all other cases not specified before.
LLVM,RISCV,3502,The next statement is "case <STR_LIT>: Kind = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr::VK_<ISA_LIT>_None; break;".
LLVM,RISCV,3503,"Kind = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_MCSymbol ; } Kind = <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_CALL ;</s>

The next statement is likely a break statement for the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3504,">


The next statement of this code snippet would be ""case <STR_LIT>:"" on line 6."
LLVM,RISCV,3505,default: llvm_unreachable("Invalid relocation type specified in relocation expression"); Kind = MCAExpr::VK_MCSymbolRef_None; break;
LLVM,RISCV,3506,return MCOperand::createExpr(ME)
LLVM,RISCV,3507,"The next statement will likely involve using the ME variable in some way, such as passing it to another function or assigning it to a new variable. This code snippet does not provide enough context to make a more specific prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,3508,"The code will return the <ISA_LIT>MCExpr :: VK_<ISA_LIT>_None, which will be the last expression created in the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3509,"It is likely that the next statement will be a closing curly brace, marking the end of the code block. The final line may also be a comment or documentation explaining the purpose of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3510,"MO . setTargetFlags ( TargetKind ) ;
 This code snippet sets a variable named ""TargetKind"" to a specific value based on the result of a function called ""MO.getTargetFlags()"". Then, it uses a switch statement to check the value of ""TargetKind"" and sets it to a different value depending on the case. The next statement is likely another case or a default case to handle potential values of ""TargetKind"" that were not explicitly checked in the previous cases."
LLVM,RISCV,3511,"Expr = MCBinaryExpr :: create ( MCBinaryExpr :: Add , Expr , OffsetExpr , Ctx ) ; }

The code snippet creates a switch statement to set the variable TargetKind based on the value of MO.getTargetFlags(). It then creates a new expression, Expr, using the MCSymbolRefExpr and MCConstantExpr classes. If there is a non-zero Offset value, the code snippet also creates and adds a MCBinaryExpr to the existing expression."
LLVM,RISCV,3512,"</s>

OutMI.addOperand(MCOp);"
LLVM,RISCV,3513,"}

The next statement is a break statement, ending the current case of switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3514,"MCOp . setReg ( Reg ) ; } else { MCOp . setReg ( TRI -> <STR_LIT> ( <STR_LIT> ) ) ; } break ; }
The next statement would be ""MCOp.setReg(TRI->getEncodingValue(Reg));"""
LLVM,RISCV,3515,"break ;

The next statement would be to break out of the switch statement and continue with the rest of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3516,"""OutMI.addOperand(MCOp);"""
LLVM,RISCV,3517,It is impossible to predict without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3518,"MCOp = lowerSymbolOperand (MO, AP.GetCPISymbol(MO.getIndex()), AP);"
LLVM,RISCV,3519,"The next statement will be ""break;"" as it is at the end of the switch statement and will exit the switch block, continuing with the rest of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3520,The next statement would be the declaration of a pointer variable 'STI' which is assigned the value of calling the getContext() function and then the getSubtargetInfo() function on the returned value.
LLVM,RISCV,3521,return length of STR_LIT
LLVM,RISCV,3522,It looks like the code is handling different types of symbol reference expressions and returning different relocation types based on the kind. The next statement might be: case MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_ABS : return getAbsReloc(Kind);
LLVM,RISCV,3523,The next statement would be "default: return getPCSRELReloc(Kind);".
LLVM,RISCV,3524,"</s>


The code snippet likely continues to define a case or condition for the code to execute."
LLVM,RISCV,3525,return 0;
LLVM,RISCV,3526,"default: return 0;

Possible next statement: 
return 0;"
LLVM,RISCV,3527,The next statement would be closing curly brace (}).
LLVM,RISCV,3528,"if ( Kind == FK_Data_4 )

return getGOTReloc ( Kind ) ;


case MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_GOTNTPOFF  : assert ( IsPCRel && ! < STR_LIT> ) ; return getTLSIEReloc ( Kind ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3529,"The next statement will most likely be a closing bracket or a return statement, as the code snippet appears to be a function or a switch case."
LLVM,RISCV,3530,llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3531,This code snippet defines a new object target writer that will generate executable files for the ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) operating system ABI (Application Binary Interface) for a specific ISA (Instruction Set Architecture).
LLVM,RISCV,3532,"target_mach = getMachOSABI(OSABI) {
 
target_mach = getMachOSABI(OSABI) is a function that gets the target machine based on the Operating System Application Binary Interface (OSABI) specified."
LLVM,RISCV,3533,"""Illegal IllegalArgumentException: missing argument"""
LLVM,RISCV,3534,The next statement could be a function declaration for the ObjectWriter class.
LLVM,RISCV,3535,"MAI->addCFIInstruction( MCCFIInstruction::createOffset( nullptr, MRI.getDwarfRegNum( <STR_LIT>, true ), <STR_LIT> ) );"
LLVM,RISCV,3536,The next statement could be to set the assembly information for the CPU architecture to the created MAI object.
LLVM,RISCV,3537,return X;
LLVM,RISCV,3538,"</s>

CodeModel :: Medium"
LLVM,RISCV,3539,The next statement would likely involve creating a new instance of the MCInstPrinter class using the provided parameters. This could involve setting the appropriate member variables and/or calling various functions from within the class.
LLVM,RISCV,3540,return X;
LLVM,RISCV,3541,Create an object of type MCInstrInfo with the name X using the default constructor and call the Init function passing in the template argument ISA_LIT and the object X.
LLVM,RISCV,3542,"return createDWARFStreamer(Ctx, MAB, OS, Emitter, RelaxAll);"
LLVM,RISCV,3543,"return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,3544,"return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,3545,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmParser ( The<ISA_LIT>Target , create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmParser ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmParser ( The<ISA_LIT>64Target , create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmParser ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3546,"return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,3547,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmInfo(*T, create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmInfo);"
LLVM,RISCV,3548,"</s>

TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmInfo ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCInstrInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCInstrInfo ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCRegInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCRegisterInfo ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmBackend ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>AsmBackend ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeEmitter ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeEmitter ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCInstPrinter ( * T , create"
LLVM,RISCV,3549,"if ( TT . isOSBinFormatELF ( ) ) return new <ISA_LIT>TargetELFStreamer ( S , STI ) ; else return NULL;"
LLVM,RISCV,3550,"MCTargetStreamer * Streamer = nullptr ;

if (TT.getArch() == Triple::arm) {
  Streamer = new ARMTargetStreamer(S);
}


Streamer = new ARMTargeStreamer(S);"
LLVM,RISCV,3551,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCObjectStreamer ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>ELFStreamer ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3552,"MCCFIInstruction Inst2 = MCCFIInstruction :: createOffset ( nullptr , BP, <NUM_LIT> ) ; MAI -> addInitialFrameState ( Inst2 ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3553,"This code snippet creates a function named ""createMCAsmInfo"" that takes in two parameters, ""MRI"" and ""TT"", and returns a pointer to an object of type ""MCAsmInfo"" for a given ISA_LIT."
LLVM,RISCV,3554,The code will likely return the variable "MAI".
LLVM,RISCV,3555,"return X ; }


return X;"
LLVM,RISCV,3556,"X >::InitMCRegisterInfo ( TT ) ; }

return X;"
LLVM,RISCV,3557,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCSubtargetInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCSubtargetInfo ) ; TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCInstrAnalysis ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCInstrAnalysis ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3558,"} </s>

Call the create<ISA_LIT>AsmBackend function and pass in the T target as its argument."
LLVM,RISCV,3559,CPUName = TT.isArch64Bit() ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,3560,std::cout << "The CPU name is " << CPUName << std::endl;
LLVM,RISCV,3561,The next statement will be: "return TT.isArch64Bit() ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,3562,"</s> 

The next statement could potentially be a conditional statement or an assignment statement to initialize the ""CPU"" variable based on whether the TT (system) is 64-bit or not."
LLVM,RISCV,3563,"MAI->addFrameOffsetRegister(SP, 0);"
LLVM,RISCV,3564,"The next statement is ""Register LB = MRI . getDwarfRegNum ( <EXPR_LIT> , false ) ;""."
LLVM,RISCV,3565,"return nullptr;}

The next statement is ""return nullptr;""."
LLVM,RISCV,3566,"This code snippet is creating a new streamer object called ""ELFStreamer"" with the given parameters of Context, MAB, MOW, MCE, and ""RelaxAll."""
LLVM,RISCV,3567,MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);
LLVM,RISCV,3568,MAI->initMCAsmInfo(Options);
LLVM,RISCV,3569,"MOFI->emitInstruction(Ctx, PIC, LargeCodeModel) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3570,MOFI->setIsLittleEndian(true); // sets the endianess to little endian
LLVM,RISCV,3571,CPU now contains either "x86" or "x64" depending on the architecture of the system.
LLVM,RISCV,3572,It is likely that the next statement would be a closing curly brace to end the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3573,This code snippet will create a new <ISA_LIT>TargetStreamer object using the variable S and return it.
LLVM,RISCV,3574,The next statement will be: Target = Addr + Inst.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getImm(); return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3575,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterELFObjectWriter ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>ELFObjectWriter ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3576,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCTargetOptions ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCTargetOptions ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3577,"It creates an instance of the class MCInstrAnalysis, passing in the Info variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3578,"This code creates a new object of the class MCInstrAnalysis and passes a pointer to an object of type MCInstrInfo to its constructor, which then calls the constructor of the base class MCInstrAnalysis with the same parameter."
LLVM,RISCV,3579,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeGenInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeGenInfo ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3580,"MCCFIInstruction Inst2 = MCCFIInstruction::cfiDefCfaOffset(nullptr, SP, <NUM_LIT>);"
LLVM,RISCV,3581,The next statement would be: RAReg = <STR_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,3582,"</s>
TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmParser ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCParser ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3583,"} TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeGenInfo ( getThe<ISA_LIT>Target ( ) , create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeGenInfo );>

TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeEmitter ( getThe<ISA_LIT>Target ( ) , create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeEmitter );"
LLVM,RISCV,3584,"The next statement would be:
TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmParser(*T, create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmParser);"
LLVM,RISCV,3585,"}</s>

The next statement might be:

void LLVMInitialize<ISA_LIT>TargetAsmParser() {}"
LLVM,RISCV,3586,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterTarget ( The<ISA_LIT>Target , create<ISA_LIT>Target ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3587,return MAI;
LLVM,RISCV,3588,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterAsmTargetStreamer ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>AsmTargetStreamer ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3589,The next statement would likely be closing curly brace to end the function or continue with a statement using the registered components.
LLVM,RISCV,3590,"} }</s>

The next statement would likely be another TargetRegistry::RegisterMC function."
LLVM,RISCV,3591,End of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3592,This code creates a new TargetAsmStreamer object using the provided arguments S and OS and returns it.
LLVM,RISCV,3593,"}

<ISA_LIT>MCAsmInfo ( TT ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3594,"</s><s>
JSelUEACompilePlugin ( X , { includes : [ <ISA_LIT>MCRegisterInfo</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3595,"The code will return the pointer to a new <ISA_LIT>TargetELFStreamer object if the target triple is of OS binary format ELF. Otherwise, it will return a null pointer."
LLVM,RISCV,3596,"if (TT.isOSBinFormatMachO()) return new <ISA_LIT>TargetMachOStreamer(S, STI);"
LLVM,RISCV,3597,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeEmitter ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>CodeEmitter ) ; } }</s>

TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCObjectFileInfo ( * T , create<ISA_LIT>MCObjectFileInfo ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3598,The next statement would likely be a closing bracket indicating the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3599,"The code snippet is likely part of a function and the next statement could potentially be another if statement or a return statement, depending on the outcome of the conditional statements."
LLVM,RISCV,3600,"The code snippet will check the opcode of the parent instruction of the use of DestReg and based on that, it will execute a certain code block. In this case, it will execute the code block for case <STR_LIT>, which will declare and initialize an integer variable Offset and then call the foldOffset function. After executing this code block, it will return true and break out of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3601,"If any of the conditions in the if statement are not met, the code will return false. If all the conditions are met, the code will set the variable HiLuiDestReg to the register of the operand at index <NUM_LIT> and then set LoADDI to the parent instruction of the first use of the register."
LLVM,RISCV,3602,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3603,"ImmOp . setOffset ( Offset ) ;

The code snippet will continue by setting the offset of the MachineOperand LoADDI for the <NUM_LIT>th operand."
LLVM,RISCV,3604,"}

The next statement is: Register BaseAddrReg = Tail.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg();"
LLVM,RISCV,3605,The next statement will check the case statement and compare the Tail operand to a fixed value.
LLVM,RISCV,3606,"if ( HiLUI . isInstruction ( HiLUI ) ) { HiLUI . dump ( ) ; HiLUI . print ( <UNDEF> , MRI ) ; } } }


The next statement is a closing bracket ""}"" indicating the end of the for loop."
LLVM,RISCV,3607,"The code will continue to iterate through the MachineBasicBlocks in the function, and for each MachineInstr in the block, it will attempt to detect and fold offset values. The last two lines of code will then erase any dead instructions and return a boolean value of true."
LLVM,RISCV,3608,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without additional context. More information is needed, such as the values of the variables used and the purpose of the code, in order to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3609,Tail.getOperand(1).setOffset(Offset);
LLVM,RISCV,3610,"return true ;}

If the offset tail opcode is a store instruction, then the offset will be assigned based on the immediate operand value and the LuiImmOp value will be shifted by the given number. The OffsetTail instruction and its corresponding OffsetLui instruction will be added to the DeadInstrs set. Otherwise, if the OffsetTail opcode is not a store instruction, the offset will be assigned based on the immediate operand value of the OffsetTail instruction, and the OffsetTail instruction will be added to the DeadInstrs set."
LLVM,RISCV,3611,"if ( ! isInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Offset ) ) return false ; return true ; }
The next statement is ""Offset = SignExtend64 < <NUM_LIT> > ( OffsetTail . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> ) . getImm ( ) << <NUM_LIT> ) ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3612,"if (HiLUI.getOpcode() == MachineInstr::LUI) {
  LoADDI = HiLUI.getNextNode();
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3613,"}

The next statement could be an if-statement that checks if a certain condition is met using the ""matchLargeOffset"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,3614,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,3615,"</s>


The next statement is ""return true ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3616,</s> The code snippet will create a new instance of the class MergeBaseOffsetOpt and return it.
LLVM,RISCV,3617,"The next statement could be another ""case"" statement under the switch statement, or it could be the end of the switch statement and the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,3618,"ImmOp . setImm ( <NUM_LIT> )

The next statement would likely be ""LoADDI.addOperand(ImmOp);"" or something similar to that."
LLVM,RISCV,3619,The next statement would likely be a "return true;" as the "return false;" statement serves as the end of the code block.
LLVM,RISCV,3620,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3621,"The next statement will likely involve manipulating or accessing the ""DeadInstrs"" variable in some way, possibly using the ""insert"" method to add or update data."
LLVM,RISCV,3622,"}</s>

The function will return a string reference."
LLVM,RISCV,3623,The next statement will most likely check the value of OffLo for a specific condition or calculation.
LLVM,RISCV,3624,"</s>

Curly braces will be used to mark the beginning and end of the function MergeBaseOffsetOpt."
LLVM,RISCV,3625,"""This function is used to optimize the offset of a merge base."""
LLVM,RISCV,3626,MadeChange.
LLVM,RISCV,3627,"""MadeChange will be updated with the result of detectAndFoldOffset() function being called on HiLUI and *LoADDI."""
LLVM,RISCV,3628,"}

string.getPassName()

The next statement is a function call to retrieve the name of a pass for optimizing vsetvl for a specific ISA."
LLVM,RISCV,3629,"}

""I am no longer able to answer this prompt because I have reached the end of the code snippet."""
LLVM,RISCV,3630,"}

""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3631,"}

""The function will return true if Reg1 and Reg2 are found in the same container."""
LLVM,RISCV,3632,"The next statement of this code snippet may be to define the parameters or arguments of the function, such as specifying the machine function or ID to be used for optimization."
LLVM,RISCV,3633,return modified;
LLVM,RISCV,3634,"}
Get the next destination register from the first copy instruction in the machine basic block."
LLVM,RISCV,3635,The code will return true.
LLVM,RISCV,3636,I am unable to generate a prediction as the code snippet provided is incomplete and lacks context. Please provide more information for accurate prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,3637,Setups.push_back(LoopSetup) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3638,AU.addPreserved<MachineDominatorTree>();
LLVM,RISCV,3639,MachineFunctionPass :: doInitialization(M) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3640,// It seems as though the next statement is a comment regarding the name of the PULP_HWLOOPS.
LLVM,RISCV,3641,"}

This code snippet sets up a loop for a specific instruction and builds a MachineBasicBlock for it."
LLVM,RISCV,3642,<SID> // Side effect loops (clobbering of liveness)
LLVM,RISCV,3643,This code snippet defines a pulsed hardware loop and sets it up as a machine function pass using the provided ID.
LLVM,RISCV,3644,"ProcessInstructions ( Setups . pop_back_val ( ) ) 

ProcessInstructions (Setups.pop_back_val())"
LLVM,RISCV,3645,"FunctionPass * llvm::createISA_LIT RedundantCopyEliminationPass ( ) {

 <s>//Creates a pass for eliminating redundant copies for a specified ISA_LIT architecture in llvm. </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3646,A method call to <ISA_LIT>RedundantCopyElimination will be executed using a new instance.
LLVM,RISCV,3647,"</s>

"" return the string reference wrapped in a constant override. """
LLVM,RISCV,3648,"</STR_LIT



Error: Missing closing semicolon after <STR_LIT>"
LLVM,RISCV,3649,"As a result, the function's virtual registers will be set to ""NoVRegs""."
LLVM,RISCV,3650,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be another conditional statement or a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3651,"The code is checking if Opc is equal to <STR_LIT> and if MI's register of the specified number is equal to <STR_LIT> as well. The code returns true if &MBB is equal to MI's MBB of the specified number, and false if they are not equal."
LLVM,RISCV,3652,"The next statement is: if (MI->modifiesRegister(TargetReg, TRI)) break;"
LLVM,RISCV,3653,"This statement goes afterRedundantCopyElimination ( )?

The next statement is likely a closing bracket, signaling the end of the RedundantCopyElimination function."
LLVM,RISCV,3654,"return Changed ;
return MF;"
LLVM,RISCV,3655,RAI.TargetRegisterInfo = TRI;
LLVM,RISCV,3656,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a function definition or a set of operations pertaining to the GenRegisterBankInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,3657,return TRI.getNumRegs();
LLVM,RISCV,3658,The next statement could be the declaration of a member function or variable inside the RegisterBankInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,3659,The next statement will be a return statement that returns a pointer to the next register class.
LLVM,RISCV,3660,The next statement is likely an if statement checking the value of the Kind variable and returning a pointer to the corresponding register class.
LLVM,RISCV,3661,"}

 FuncNeedsFrameIndexScavenging (MF)

numberofvariousFrameIndices( const MachineFunction &MF) {

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3662,report_fatal_error(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,3663,"return CSR_ILP32D_LP64D_SaveList;

if(Subtarget.hasStdExtV()) return CSR_XLEN_V_Interrupt_SaveList;"
LLVM,RISCV,3664,"The next statement will likely be another ""case"" statement, returning the value ""CSR_ILP32_LP64_SaveList""."
LLVM,RISCV,3665,break;
LLVM,RISCV,3666,"}

llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)"
LLVM,RISCV,3667,The next statement will be to return the variable Reserved after checking that all super registers have been marked in the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3668,It is likely that the code snippet will continue with an additional function or operation being performed on the variable "Reserved".
LLVM,RISCV,3669,"*}

Check whether |Offset| is an integer"
LLVM,RISCV,3670,"The next statement would be:
BuildMI (MBB, II, DL, TII->get(ZvlssegInfo.SpillOpcode), MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + ZvlssegInfo.SpillOffset).getReg()).addReg(MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).getReg(), getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).isKill())).addReg(MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + ZvlssegInfo.InsOffset).getReg(), ZvlssegInfo.InsFlags);"
LLVM,RISCV,3671,The next statement could be a closing curly brace or possibly another conditional statement. It is difficult to determine without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3672,We cannot determine the next statement without more context. The snippet is incomplete.
LLVM,RISCV,3673,Ops.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_deref);
LLVM,RISCV,3674,"Ops . append ( { dwarf :: DW_OP_consts , VLENBSized } ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3675,"""Return the result of a conditional statement, checking if the subtarget of the MF variable has the standard extension C, with the first number value being returned if true and the second number value being returned if false."""
LLVM,RISCV,3676,"<
NUM_LIT>
1"
LLVM,RISCV,3677,"The next statement may be to close the if statement and end the function, or to continue with additional code related to the reserved registers."
LLVM,RISCV,3678,"if ( TargetFrameIndexInfo -> hasVA ( MF ) ) markSuperRegs ( Reserved , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3679,The next statement could possibly be checking if the FrameIdx is equal to zero and returning false if it is.
LLVM,RISCV,3680,"}</s>

The next statement would likely be:
<s> MF . getSubtarget < <ISA_LIT>Subtarget > ( ) . isRegisterReservedByUser ( Reg ) </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3681,Ne ! MP . getSubtarget ( <ISA_LIT>Subtarget > ( ) . isRegisterReservedByUser ( PhysReg ) .
LLVM,RISCV,3682,"""assert ( checkAllSuperRegsMarked ( Reserved ) )"""
LLVM,RISCV,3683,"The code will check if the target frame information has a frame pointer and if it does, it will mark the super registers. It will also mark the super registers multiple times and then assert that all the super registers have been marked. Finally, it will return the marked super registers."
LLVM,RISCV,3684,"next statement MachineInstr * MI = BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(<STR_LIT>)) .addReg(FrameReg) .addImm(Offset) .addReg(<STR_LIT>); //Assuming all other cases fall through, this statement will be executed next."
LLVM,RISCV,3685,"}

llvm_unreachable ( <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3686,"""markSuperRegs(Reserved, <NUM_LIT>)"""
LLVM,RISCV,3687,"Insert a new condition: 
if (Offset.isVariable())"
LLVM,RISCV,3688,"ADDIWimm (  DestReg ,  FI , Offset . getFixed ( ) , MBB , II , DL , TII , STM ,   MI . getOpcode ( ) , STI ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3689,return CSR_XLEN_ILP32_LP64_SaveList;
LLVM,RISCV,3690,"case <STR_LIT> : return CSR_IL32PC64D_L64PC128D_RegMask ;

The next statement would most likely be a ""default"" case, where the code will execute the ""llvm_unreachable(<STR_LIT>)"" statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3691,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The next statement could be anything, as it depends on the values of the variables TFI and MF."
LLVM,RISCV,3692,The next statement could possibly be another if statement checking for specific registers or a return statement marking the ending of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3693,"The next statement is the end of the constructor function, which would likely include closing brackets or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3694,return GenRegisterInfo;
LLVM,RISCV,3695,<s> return false ;
LLVM,RISCV,3696,"</s>

<s>auto * MFInfo = RVFI->getMachineFunctionInfo();</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3697,assert(isInt<<<NUM_LIT>>>(Offset) && <STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,3698,"}

The next statement will likely be a conditional statement that evaluates whether or not the value of ""Offset"" is an integer."
LLVM,RISCV,3699,The next statement would be "auto FII = FixedCSRFIMap . find ( Reg );"
LLVM,RISCV,3700,"if (FrameIdx == 0) {
  return false;
} else {
  return true;
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3701,assert(isInt<32767>(Offset) && "Offset must fit in 16 bits.");
LLVM,RISCV,3702,FrameRegIsKill is equal to true.
LLVM,RISCV,3703,"</s>

The next statement is ""// Should not be reached: unsupported calling convention!"""
LLVM,RISCV,3704,return the frame pointer register or zero
LLVM,RISCV,3705,assert ( checkAllSuperRegsMarked ( Reserved ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3706,if ( FII->second != nullptr) return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3707,"</s>

if (FII == FixedCSRFIMap.end()) return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3708,"</s>

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3709,"The next statement would likely be a return statement, where the function returns a boolean value based on whether or not the MCRegister parameter is a constant physical register in the register information."
LLVM,RISCV,3710,It is likely that the next statement in the code snippet will be checking if the return value of the function is true or false for the given PhysReg.
LLVM,RISCV,3711,"}

The next statement could be a conditional statement that checks if the Offset is still not an integer."
LLVM,RISCV,3712,return CSR_ILP32F_LP64F_VEC_SaveList
LLVM,RISCV,3713,"return CSR_ILP32D_LP64D_SaveList

The next statement will be a return statement, returning the CSR_ILP32D_LP64D_SaveList constant."
LLVM,RISCV,3714,case "LP64F":
LLVM,RISCV,3715,"TFI->emitPrologue(MF, MI);"
LLVM,RISCV,3716,The next statement is: MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).ChangeToFrameIndex(FrameIndex);
LLVM,RISCV,3717,Each callee-saved register in the MachineFunction will be returned.
LLVM,RISCV,3718,There will be another invocation of the function "markSuperRegs" with the parameters "Reserved" and "<STR_LIT>".
LLVM,RISCV,3719,">

The next statement will be: ""return Reserved;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3720,"If statement (condition) is true, the function will return CSR_XLEN_F64_Interrupt_SaveList."
LLVM,RISCV,3721,"The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace, signifying the end of the code block."
LLVM,RISCV,3722,"Debug(""FrameReg = %d, Offset = %lld, IsKill = %d"", FrameReg, Offset, IsKill);"
LLVM,RISCV,3723,FrameIndex = MF.getFrameInfo()->getObjectOffset(...) + FrameReg;
LLVM,RISCV,3724,int Reg = MRI.removeRegFromLiveOut(MI.getParent().getParent());
LLVM,RISCV,3725,"If the Subtarget does not have a D extension, but has an F extension, the code will return CSR_RV64F_SaveList."
LLVM,RISCV,3726,"if ( Subtarget . hasF ( ) )
return CSR_RV64F_SaveList ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3727,else return CSR_RV64_RegMask
LLVM,RISCV,3728,The next statement is a conditional statement that checks if the target processor is 64-bit.
LLVM,RISCV,3729,Reserved.set(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,3730,"The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement checking for the presence of a certain feature, followed by a series of calls to set that feature with string literals as parameters. There may also be additional calls to set with different string literals outside of the conditional statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3731,"This snippet defines a class called RegisterInfo and uses a constructor to initialize it with a reference to a Subtarget object. The constructor also initializes a GenRegisterInfo object using a string literal, and the Subtarget object using the STI variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3732,"""// Constructor for RegisterInfo class initialized with Subtarget object STI"""
LLVM,RISCV,3733,"MF.addLiveIn ( Register );

return MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(&PtrRC);"
LLVM,RISCV,3734,The code will call the function "assert" and pass in the result of the function "checkAllSuperRegsMarked" with the parameter "Reserved". It will then return the value of "Reserved".
LLVM,RISCV,3735,The output of this code snippet will return the value of the variable "Reserved".
LLVM,RISCV,3736,"The next statement would likely involve using the DebugLoc and FrameReg variables to access and manipulate the instruction's debug information and frame register information, respectively."
LLVM,RISCV,3737,This is not possible to predict without more context or the actual code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3738,"return CSR_RID + N ; } </STR_LIT>

The code snippet will return the register of the callee saved register associated with the specific machine function if the function has a specific attribute."
LLVM,RISCV,3739,"} else { return CSR_SaveStack ; } </s>

if (MF -> getFunction ().hasFnAttribute(<STR_LIT>)) { if (MF -> getSubtarget <<ISA_LIT>Subtarget>().hasStdExtD()) { if (MF -> getSubtarget <<ISA_LIT>Subtarget>().hasStdExtF()) return CSR_XLEN_F64_Interrupt_SaveList; return CSR_XLEN_F32_Interrupt_SaveList; } return CSR_Interrupt_SaveList; } else { return CSR_SaveStack; }"
LLVM,RISCV,3740,} return
LLVM,RISCV,3741,"This code snippet checks if the target subtarget supports either floating-point extension D or F. If it does, it will return the corresponding interrupt register mask. If not, it will return the default CSR interrupt register mask."
LLVM,RISCV,3742,"""Return the non-preserved mask for the register information."""
LLVM,RISCV,3743,"The next statement will assert that all super registers have been marked as Reserved, and then return the value of Reserved. The code snippet may be part of a function that is marking super registers as Reserved before checking that they have all been properly marked."
LLVM,RISCV,3744,"}</S>

The next statement would be to close the function using the closing curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,3745,The code will return a boolean value that represents whether the variable "PhysReg" is equal to the string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,3746,This code snippet defines a RegisterInfo class and initializes it with a hardware mode parameter.
LLVM,RISCV,3747,The next statement is most likely a line of code that initializes the register info for a specific hardware mode.
LLVM,RISCV,3748,"}

There will be a return statement returning the value ""true""."
LLVM,RISCV,3749,"}</s>

I'm sorry, I cannot accurately predict the next statement as it is a single line function and there is no way to determine what the next line would be without knowing the full context of the code. It is possible that this could be followed by a return statement, or an if statement to check the return value, or it could simply be the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3750,<p> lastVSETVLIOfMBB[MBB] = tailVSETVLI[MBB]; </p>
LLVM,RISCV,3751,"}
} 

Nothing, as the end of the for loop has been reached and there are no more instructions in the MBB."
LLVM,RISCV,3752,The next statement would likely involve iterating to the next instruction in the MachineBasicBlock (MBB) and checking if it meets the conditions specified in the if statement. This process would continue until all instructions have been checked.
LLVM,RISCV,3753,This function collects redundant VSETVLI instructions in the given MachineFunction MF and returns a list of them.
LLVM,RISCV,3754,"if (MBB.empty()) {
  continue;
}


for (auto &MBB2 : MF) {
  if (MBB2.empty()) {
    continue;
  }
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3755,"</s>

{

  return new

OPISARemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass();

}

The next statement will be a closing curly brace (})."
LLVM,RISCV,3756,"}

The next statement would be to close the function and/or code block, such as with a closing bracket or curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,3757,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context, as the current statement is incomplete."
LLVM,RISCV,3758,"</s>

Throws an error incorrect input."
LLVM,RISCV,3759,The code will return "false" if both operands are of type Register and they are not equal.
LLVM,RISCV,3760,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or the rest of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3761,"}

This code snippet is incomplete and cannot be used to make a prediction."
LLVM,RISCV,3762,"else if ( redundancyVSETVLI . size ( ) == 1 ) return true ; </s>

else

Explanation: The next statement will most likely be another conditional statement checking for a different condition. It could also potentially be a return statement, depending on the logic of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3763,MF = restructureMF(MF);
LLVM,RISCV,3764,"if (getTargetMachine().getSubtarget<VSETVLSubtarget>().getFeatureBits().count(VSETVFL)) {
    return false;
  }
}

The next statement would be:

return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,3765,"""""""

It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context."
LLVM,RISCV,3766,"</s>

This code creates a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>RI5CYIRPass as an object of the FunctionPass class."
LLVM,RISCV,3767,The code is creating and returning a new <ISA_LIT>RI5CYIR object.
LLVM,RISCV,3768,"</s>

You cannot predict the next statement as it depends on the code context and the value of the <STR_LIT> variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3769,}
LLVM,RISCV,3770,This code snippet is checking the operands and constants of a conditional statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3771,return;
LLVM,RISCV,3772,"</s>

throw new Metadata_Exception(""Metadata type cannot be uninitialized."");"
LLVM,RISCV,3773,"</s>

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3774,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3775,"}

<FINISH_STATEMENT>

This snippet will likely be followed by a closing curly brace and semicolon (});)."
LLVM,RISCV,3776,"unsigned int value ; if ( immediate < <NUM_LIT> ) { limit_l = <NUM_LIT> ; limit_r = <NUM_LIT> ; value = <NUM_LIT> ; }
The next statement of this code snippet is:

while ( limit_l <= <NUM_LIT> ) { limit_r += limit_r; value += value; }"
LLVM,RISCV,3777,"The next statement will likely be another conditional statement or a loop, as the code snippet ends with an incomplete closing brace."
LLVM,RISCV,3778,"}
There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could be any number of statements that come after a closing curly brace in a C++ class definition. Some possibilities could include declaring more instance variables or methods, defining functions, or ending the class definition."
LLVM,RISCV,3779,The code is about to close the if statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3780,"Args . push_back ( Entry ) ; };
 

// Use the pushArg lambda function to add the SDValue to the Args vector."
LLVM,RISCV,3781,"This code snippet is likely part of a compiler or assembler and is used to emit target-specific code for a memory operation. The next statement could be to handle any additional conditions or special cases for the memory operation, such as checking for null pointers or calculating offsets. Alternatively, the next statement may be to handle error cases and return an error code if the memory operation cannot be completed successfully."
LLVM,RISCV,3782,">

callFunction (DAG, dl, Chain, memFnName, Dst, Src, Size)"
LLVM,RISCV,3783,"""Both statements will be executed and a call to DAG.getAddrSpaceCast will be made for both Dst and Src with the provided parameters."""
LLVM,RISCV,3784,"</s>

The next statement is:

return reinterpret_cast<const <ISA_LIT>Subtarget&>(DAG.getSubtarget());"
LLVM,RISCV,3785,"n_subtarget = <ISA_LIT> :: <ISA_LIT>Subtarget::create ( DAG ); 
return n_subtarget;"
LLVM,RISCV,3786,return;
LLVM,RISCV,3787,This code snippet defines the destructor for the SelectionDAGInfo class.
LLVM,RISCV,3788,"Worklist . push_back ( UserOp . getParent ( ) ); 

for (auto &insn : MRI.reg_instructions(UserOp.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg())) { 
Worklist.push_back(insn);}"
LLVM,RISCV,3789,"There will likely be a ""break;"" statement after the last return <STR_LIT> statement, which will end the switch case. Then, the program will continue to the next line of code, which is the closing curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,3790,"return <STR_LIT>
The code will return a String literal."
LLVM,RISCV,3791,MachineInstr *
LLVM,RISCV,3792,"if ( ! SrcReg . isVirtual ( )

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,3793,"}

The next statement will be a closing curly brace, indicating the end of the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3794,"return true ;

None, this code snippet looks like a completed function and there are no more statements."
LLVM,RISCV,3795,The next statement of this code snippet will be a return statement that checks if the operand of the given machine instruction (MI) is an unsigned integer that is less than the specified number.
LLVM,RISCV,3796,return new <ISA_LIT>PtrToInt ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3797,"}

 The next statement is likely to return the string ""STR_LIT"" as a StringRef object."
LLVM,RISCV,3798,The next statement is "return passName;" where "passName" is a variable that contains the name of the pass.
LLVM,RISCV,3799,"The code will continue onto the next statement, which is a closing curly brace."
LLVM,RISCV,3800,"}

case <STR_LIT> : if ( MI -> getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) { E = MI -> getNumOperands ( ) ; D = <NUM_LIT> ; } for ( unsigned I = <NUM_LIT> ; I != E ; I += D ) { if ( ! MI -> getOperand ( I ) . isReg ( ) ) return false ; Register SrcReg = MI -> getOperand ( I ) . getReg ( ) ; if ( ! SrcReg . isVirtual ( ) ) return false ; const MachineInstr * SrcMI = MRI . getVRegDef"
LLVM,RISCV,3801,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. The code provided only contains a series of ""case"" statements and does not include a switch or function declaration. Additionally, the statements following the case statements may also vary depending on the code's context."
LLVM,RISCV,3802,return llvm::createSExtWRemovalPass(ID);
LLVM,RISCV,3803,"}

""End of code snippet."""
LLVM,RISCV,3804,LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Constrained register class mismatch");
LLVM,RISCV,3805,"Reloc::Model

return RM;"
LLVM,RISCV,3806,"# </s>

Frame size has increased since the last return.


The next statement could be something like, ""The current value of FrameLowering will be returned."""
LLVM,RISCV,3807,"</s>

<s>} </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3808,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It is possible that there is no next statement, as this statement appears to end the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,3809,"``

return nullptr;"
LLVM,RISCV,3810,"This function returns a pointer to the TargetSelectionDAGInfo object, which contains information about the target's SelectionDAG."
LLVM,RISCV,3811,The code will parse the subtarget features based on the CPU name and return *this.
LLVM,RISCV,3812,The next statement will be to call the function ParseSubtargetFeatures with the parameters CPUName and FS.
LLVM,RISCV,3813,"return CM != CodeModel :: KC
""Sentence ends with a closing curly brace and semi-colon."""
LLVM,RISCV,3814,This code snippet checks if the target Triple is in the ELF format and returns a boolean value.
LLVM,RISCV,3815,"Possible:

The next statement in this code snippet will most likely be a function call to return the operating system (OS) binary format for ELF (Executable and Linkable Format)."
LLVM,RISCV,3816,"The next statement would likely continue to initialize other subtarget properties of the TargetMachine, such as HasM (floating point hardware support), HasA (atomic operations support), HasX (vector extension support), HasF (single precision floating point support), and HasD (double precision floating point support)."
LLVM,RISCV,3817,"The next statement could potentially be initializing the registers for M, A, X, F, D, TargetTriple,InstrInfo, TLInfo, TSInfo, and FrameLowering."
LLVM,RISCV,3818,"}

This code snippet returns the value of the variable ""UseSoftFloat"", indicating whether soft float is being used or not."
LLVM,RISCV,3819,"</s>

This code will return the value of the EnableLinkerRelax variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3820,</s> The next statement is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3821,The next statement of this code snippet could be a comment explaining the purpose of the EnableRVCHintInstrs variable or a code implementation using the variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3822,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3823,"The next statement could be:

return EnableAutoSave;"
LLVM,RISCV,3824,"</s>



It is likely that the next statement would be to end the current function or to define a variable/constant."
LLVM,RISCV,3825,return (enableUnalignedScalarMem);
LLVM,RISCV,3826,"1. ""The function hasVInstructionsI64 will return true, and the value <NUM_LIT> will be returned."""
LLVM,RISCV,3827,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement will involve the returned value of the ""InstrInfo"" variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3828,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the code snippet in its entirety.
LLVM,RISCV,3829,"return llvm::MaxInterleaveFactor

;

}"
LLVM,RISCV,3830,"}</s>

the maximum vector length variable."
LLVM,RISCV,3831,"</s>

The next statement may be a return statement indicating the maximum value length for a given function."
LLVM,RISCV,3832,"}
</s>

It is likely that the next statement would be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3833,"There is no more code to execute, so the next statement will be the end of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3834,The next statement will be "ProcFamily" being returned as the result of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3835,"for ( unsigned loop = 2 ; loop <= MaxLoop ; ++ loop ) { VLen = std :: min ( VLen , getMaxRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) ) ; } return VLen ;

""return VLen;"""
LLVM,RISCV,3836,It is impossible to accurately predict the next statement without further context or knowledge of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3837,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context of the code snippet and the content of the variable "TSInfo."
LLVM,RISCV,3838,"} </s>

The next statement is likely to be another function or method declaration that is related to target lowering, possibly with a different name or parameter list and returning a different value."
LLVM,RISCV,3839,"} </s>

The next statement would likely involve using the returned TargetLowering object to perform some kind of task or access information related to code generation for a specific target architecture."
LLVM,RISCV,3840,"}
The next statement will likely relate to the function getXLen, such as calling it or setting a variable equal to its returned value."
LLVM,RISCV,3841,"1. abstract{-2, 4, 7, 10}; }

2. return abstract;"
LLVM,RISCV,3842,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing what code precedes this snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3843,return the value of the variable HasStdExtA
LLVM,RISCV,3844,This code snippet returns the value of the variable named "HasStdExtC".
LLVM,RISCV,3845,TRUE
LLVM,RISCV,3846,"</s>
</s> A) A) </s> available for C++ compilers"
LLVM,RISCV,3847,There is not enough information to generate a meaningful prediction as the code snippet is incomplete.
LLVM,RISCV,3848,The next statement will likely be a curly brace to close the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3849,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3850,Cannot determine as there is not enough context provided. The next statement could be anything that follows a return statement in the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3851,return _hasStdExtZba;
LLVM,RISCV,3852,"}

The next statement is going to be the closing curly brace ""}"" to close the function declaration."
LLVM,RISCV,3853,"The next statement would be the end of the code snippet, indicating that the value of the variable HasStdExtZbb is being returned."
LLVM,RISCV,3854,It is not possible to predict the next statement without additional context or knowledge of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3855,"+= 1;




Error: There is an unexpected ""+="" operator without a variable being assigned on the right side."
LLVM,RISCV,3856,"roc_bool to_ret=parf2 (string)(""bool"");

return to_ret;"
LLVM,RISCV,3857,There is not enough information to make a prediction. We would need to see the rest of the code snippet to determine what the next statement would be.
LLVM,RISCV,3858,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet. It is likely that the next statement involves using the ""HasStdExtZbkc"" variable in some way, such as assigning it a value or performing an operation on it."
LLVM,RISCV,3859,"}
 
This code snippet appears to be defining a function. The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to complete the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3860,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code.
LLVM,RISCV,3861,"It is impossible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing more information about the context of the code snippet. It could be an if statement, a function call, or a variable assignment."
LLVM,RISCV,3862,"}</s>

The next statement will return the value of the boolean variable named HasStdExtZbm. This could either be true or false, depending on its current assigned value."
LLVM,RISCV,3863,"</s>

return m_sysinfo->hasStdExtZbp()

<m_sysinfo->hasPwrStateExt()"
LLVM,RISCV,3864,"</s>

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3865,"}


This next statement is likely to be the ending curly brace marking the end of the ""hasStdExtZbr"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,3866,"The code snippet does not contain enough information to be able to make a prediction. It seems to be a function definition, but we cannot determine what the next statement would be without knowing the purpose of the function and its parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,3867,"</s>

It is likely that the next statement in this code snippet will be the closing bracket that ends the function or program."
LLVM,RISCV,3868,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,3869,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It could be anything from a conditional statement to a variable assignment.
LLVM,RISCV,3870,"}

A statement indicating whether or not the hasStdExtZfh function is true."
LLVM,RISCV,3871,It is not possible to predict the next statement without further context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3872,"}

It is likely that the next statement will be either a closing brace or a return statement that specifies what value is being returned."
LLVM,RISCV,3873,"if (isAnyX >> , <s>eXaken)
return true; } 

There may be additional code following the if statement that continues the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3874,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,3875,"</s>


}"
LLVM,RISCV,3876,"</s>

The next statement will most likely be the closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,3877,"</s>

<\s> if (this.variable != null) { </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3878,Cannot provide a prediction without seeing the code snippet in its entirety. <e>
LLVM,RISCV,3879,"next statement:
Either an opening curly brace ({) to begin the function body or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3880,"</s>


The next statement could be a return statement, such as ""return true;"" or ""return false;"". Alternatively, it could be an if statement checking a condition, such as ""if (variable == 0) {...}"" or ""if (string.length() > 10) {...}""."
LLVM,RISCV,3881,Error: SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'return'
LLVM,RISCV,3882,"There is no additional code provided, so it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3883,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,3884,"I'm sorry, I am unable to predict the next statement of a code snippet without more context or information about the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3885,"}

The next statement would likely be the end of the function, marked by a closing brace and a semicolon (;), indicating that the function has ended."
LLVM,RISCV,3886,"</s>

<s> return !std::is_const_v<typename accessor<std::remove_const_t<T>>::value_type>; </s>

<s> } </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3887,"next_instruction

This code snippet seems incomplete, as the statement ends abruptly after ""next_instruction."" It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the rest of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3888,undefined
LLVM,RISCV,3889,No more statements.
LLVM,RISCV,3890,"}

This function returns a boolean value indicating whether the processor has vector instructions for floating point operations."
LLVM,RISCV,3891,"The next statement will be a conditional statement, checking if the variables HasStdExtZve64d and HasStdExtD both evaluate to true."
LLVM,RISCV,3892,'s' accumulator including 64 bit instructions
LLVM,RISCV,3893,Impossible to predict without seeing more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3894,"The next statement would likely be a function declaration or definition that uses the ""is64Bit"" function, such as: 
""bool is64 = is64Bit();"""
LLVM,RISCV,3895,"}</s>

This code snippet returns the value of the variable ""HasRV64""."
LLVM,RISCV,3896,"</s>

This code snippet does not have enough information to accurately predict the next statement. More context is needed."
LLVM,RISCV,3897,This code snippet is likely to return the value stored in the UserReservedRegister at index i.
LLVM,RISCV,3898,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the full code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3899,return this->arch == RV32E;
LLVM,RISCV,3900,assert ( hasVInstructions ( ) && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3901,"""
It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables RVVVectorBitsMax and RVVVectorBitsMin."
LLVM,RISCV,3902,"The code snippet cannot be fully predicted as it is incomplete and some information is missing. However, based on the given context, the next statement could be the end of an if statement or a return statement."
LLVM,RISCV,3903,The function will return a boolean value indicating whether the variable "hasStdExtB" is true or false.
LLVM,RISCV,3904,"Possible next statement: 

}"
LLVM,RISCV,3905,"}</s>


The code snippet defines a function called ""hasStdExtZbproposedc"" which returns the value of a variable ""HasStdExtZbproposedc""."
LLVM,RISCV,3906,"return Is64Bit ? SubtargetFeatures & Subtarget::getDefaultFeatures(CPU, FS) : SubtargetFeatures & Subtarget::GetMistunedFeatures (TuneCPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,3907,"In the next statement, the value of FS will be parsed based on the features of the CPU and TuneCPU variables."
LLVM,RISCV,3908,return <ISA_LIT>_ANDRIOD3 ;
LLVM,RISCV,3909,"}</s>

The next statement would be to close the function with a closing curly brace: ""}"""
LLVM,RISCV,3910,TRUE
LLVM,RISCV,3911,"}</s>

It is most likely that the next statement will check if the EnableSubRegLiveness flag is set and return true or false accordingly."
LLVM,RISCV,3912,"It is likely that the next statement will be another assert statement, as the code snippet seems to be performing some kind of error checking and validation."
LLVM,RISCV,3913,"The next statement is:

return RVVVectorBitsMax;"
LLVM,RISCV,3914,"//The next statement would likely be another assert statement, perhaps checking for a specific condition using the value of Min."
LLVM,RISCV,3915,"</s>

It is possible that an error will be raised due to a missing standard extension for fixed length vectors."
LLVM,RISCV,3916,"</s>

cout << ""Standard extensions version is valid."";"
LLVM,RISCV,3917,The next statement might be a conditional statement checking the value of the variable "Is64Bit".
LLVM,RISCV,3918,The next statement will likely involve setting up or initializing hardware modes and/or target-specific information for the subtarget defined in this code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3919,"""Instantiate a TargetMachine object with the given parameters and call the constructor of the Subtarget class with those parameters."""
LLVM,RISCV,3920,Update XLenVT and XLen depending on Is64Bit value
LLVM,RISCV,3921,"<STR_LIT> ( TT , getRegisterInfo ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3922,"""Create a RegisterBankInfo object using the RegisterInfo object and assign it to RBI."""
LLVM,RISCV,3923,The next statement will probably be related to the creation or initialization of a new object or variable.
LLVM,RISCV,3924,"""The remaining member variables of Subtarget will be initialized."""
LLVM,RISCV,3925,"The code will initialize a string variable ""CPUName"" with the value of ""CPU"", check if it is empty, and if so, assign a value based on the condition ""Is64Bit"". It will then parse some subtarget features using the CPUName and if the condition ""Is64Bit"" is true, it will assign values to ""XLenVT"" and ""XLen""."
LLVM,RISCV,3926,"It is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, where the value being returned is the result of a function called PowerOf2Floor, which takes as its argument the maximum value between the RVVVectorELENMax and ELEN variables, which are determined by the hasVInstructionsI64 function. The return value will be the largest power of 2 that is less than or equal to the result of the max function, with a minimum of <NUM_LIT>. After this return statement, the code snippet may continue with additional lines of code."
LLVM,RISCV,3927,return ELEN;
LLVM,RISCV,3928,"}

return HasC910;"
LLVM,RISCV,3929,This code snippet does not contain enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It may continue with more code inside the function or it may end with a closing curly brace.
LLVM,RISCV,3930,The next statement is most likely related to initializing the machine scheduler and will likely contain the keyword "initialize".
LLVM,RISCV,3931,"InstrInfo ( initializeSubtargetDependencies ( CPU , FS ) ) is a function that is called to initialize the subtarget dependencies with the provided parameters of CPU and FS."
LLVM,RISCV,3932,This code snippet cannot be completed without further information.
LLVM,RISCV,3933,The next statement will likely involve setting/resetting a variable or calling a function using the RegisterBankInfo variable "RBI".
LLVM,RISCV,3934,"</s>

Boolean indidcator for enabling CHERI RISC-V instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,3935,"The next statement cannot be predicted, as it depends on the context and purpose of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,3936,"</s>

This code snippet is returning the value of the variable ""IsCapMode""."
LLVM,RISCV,3937,"if (window()->modal()) {return (cur<

The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the if statement, or a return statement if the condition is not met."
LLVM,RISCV,3938,RegBankInfo->reset(RBI);
LLVM,RISCV,3939,"""InstSelector"" will be reset to create a new InstructionSelector object using the ""TargetMachine"", ""this,"" and ""RBI"" as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,3940,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context or knowledge about the is64Bit() function and the specific values or data types being used for the <STR_LIT> placeholder.
LLVM,RISCV,3941,"""A 64-bit compatible version of the function will be used if the condition is true, otherwise a 32-bit compatible version will be used."""
LLVM,RISCV,3942,FS.enableJOINT_DWARF;
LLVM,RISCV,3943,HasC (false)
LLVM,RISCV,3944,<ISA_LIT>FrameLowering (initializeFrameLoweringDependencies(*this))
LLVM,RISCV,3945,std::string HWMode = getHwMode();
LLVM,RISCV,3946,The next statement will likely be the closing curly bracket of the constructor function.
LLVM,RISCV,3947,"</s>

The next statement could be an error message or a statement indicating that the assertion has passed."
LLVM,RISCV,3948,"The next statement in this code snippet will involve returning the value of PowerOf2Floor, with a calculation involving the maximum and minimum of two unsigned integers and a variable named RVVVectorELENMax."
LLVM,RISCV,3949,The next statement would be an assertion that confirms that RVVVectorBitsMax is greater than or equal to RVVVectorBitsMin.
LLVM,RISCV,3950,assert ( isPowerOf2_32 ( RVVVectorBitsMax ) && <STR_LIT> );
LLVM,RISCV,3951,assert (Min < RVVVectorBitsMax);
LLVM,RISCV,3952,It is not possible to predict the next statement with only the given information. The code snippet is incomplete and it is not clear what language or context the code is in.
LLVM,RISCV,3953,This code snippet will return the value of Zvl65536b.
LLVM,RISCV,3954,return HasStdExtZve64x;
LLVM,RISCV,3955,There is no next statement as this is the end of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3956,"If the function hasVInstructionsF32 is called, it will return either true if the HasStdExtV is true or if HasStdExtZve32f and HasStdExtF are both true."
LLVM,RISCV,3957,This function will return a boolean value indicating whether the system has floating point instructions.
LLVM,RISCV,3958,"Expect it to output a boolean value representing the logical or of the variables HasStdExtV, HasStdExtZve64d, and HasStdExtD."
LLVM,RISCV,3959,"</s>

return is64Bit();


}"
LLVM,RISCV,3960,"</s>

I believe the code will return true if either HasStdExtV or HasStdExtZve64x is true, indicating that there are vector instructions for 64-bit integers available."
LLVM,RISCV,3961,It's not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3962,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without more information about the code and context in which it is used. Can you provide more context or the full code snippet?
LLVM,RISCV,3963,<s> Debug.Log("Extension X Core Version Found.");
LLVM,RISCV,3964,"}</s>

The next statement would be a closing curly brace (""}"")."
LLVM,RISCV,3965,The next statement will likely be "}" as it marks the end of the code block and signals the end of the function.
LLVM,RISCV,3966,"}

return HasStdExtV"
LLVM,RISCV,3967,"}</s>

The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace ""}""."
LLVM,RISCV,3968,"</s>bool hasP

<P>The next line of code will check if the processor has parallel instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,3969,hasVInstructionsF32 is a function that checks if the object has any floating point instructions.
LLVM,RISCV,3970,return HasStdExtV2 && hasStdExtD2 ( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3971,"</s>

`bool F64Instructions = hasF64Instructions();`"
LLVM,RISCV,3972,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the context and purpose of the code snippet. It could vary depending on the code and any potential conditional statements or loops.
LLVM,RISCV,3973,This function checks if there are any virtual instructions for 64-bit integers in the code.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,3974,RegBankInfo.reset(RBI);
LLVM,RISCV,3975,assert ( RVVVectorBitsMax <= RVVVectorBitsMin || RVVVectorBitsMax == (RVVVectorBitsMax & -RVVVectorBitsMax));
LLVM,RISCV,3976,"Min = std :: min ( RVVVectorBitsMin , RVVVectorBitsMax ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3977,{ ISA_LIT }Subtarget ::initCompressInstPtrMode( ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,3978,The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace indicating the end of the constructor function.
LLVM,RISCV,3979,"</s>

 <s>Initialize the system of the Subtarget.</s>"
LLVM,RISCV,3980,The next statement would be to declare the function body for the anchor() function.
LLVM,RISCV,3981,I am unable to predict the next statement without more context. Please provide more information or the full code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3982,"</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without additional context or information about the program."
LLVM,RISCV,3983,The next statement will most likely be the result of the function call to Legalizer.get().
LLVM,RISCV,3984,"The next statement will likely involve a return statement, as the code snippet appears to be a function that is checking conditions and asserting certain things."
LLVM,RISCV,3985,The next statement will be the closing curly bracket that ends the return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,3986,</s>
LLVM,RISCV,3987,"The code checks whether there is a standard extension available and if so, it asserts the contained string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,3988,The next statement is: "return PowerOf2Floor ( ( Max < 8 || Max > 8192 ) ? 8 : Max ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,3989,The next statement will likely involve a conditional statement or mathematical operation involving the variables Min and RVVVectorBitsMin or RVVVectorBitsMax. It may also involve a function call to PowerOf2Floor.
LLVM,RISCV,3990,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,3991,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,3992,"</s>


A possible next statement could be:
if (HasAVX && HasFMA) {
  //set optimization flags for AVX and FMA instructions
}"
LLVM,RISCV,3993,"The next statement is most likely another conditional statement or a variable assignment, as it is common for code snippets to include multiple statements within if/else blocks. It is not possible to predict the exact content of the next statement without more context."
LLVM,RISCV,3994,"Pattern: The next statement should start with ""auto * NF = new <ISA_LIT>NodeFactory;"" or something similar. 

Possible next statement:
auto * NF = new <ISA_LIT>NodeFactory;"
LLVM,RISCV,3995,Error: Syntax error. "STR_LIT" must be replaced with a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,3996,"return The<ISA_LIT>32Target ; }

The statement would likely be a function call to getThe<ISA_LIT>32Target, which will return the static instance of the Target class named The<ISA_LIT>32Target."
LLVM,RISCV,3997,The<ISA_LIT>32Target variable is now declared as a static target.
LLVM,RISCV,3998,"return The<ISA_LIT>64Target ; }</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""getThe64Target"" that has a return type of ""Target"". It creates a static variable named ""The64Target"" and returns it whenever the function is called."
LLVM,RISCV,3999,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It appears to be declaring or defining a target register for a specific processor architecture, but without knowing the context or specific values being used, it is impossible to determine the next statement."
LLVM,RISCV,4000,<Target>The<ISA_LIT>32Target.nextStatement();
LLVM,RISCV,4001,"return &The<ISA_LIT>32Target ; }

The next statement will return a pointer to the statically declared instance of the Target class, named The<ISA_LIT>32Target."
LLVM,RISCV,4002,"</s>
The next statement is most likely to define a new variable or function associated with the target ISA."
LLVM,RISCV,4003,Error: missing semicolon after closing parenthesis.
LLVM,RISCV,4004,"""return X;"""
LLVM,RISCV,4005,"<s> virtual void adjustTargetOptions(const llvm::CodeGen::CodeGenOptions &Opts, llvm::TargetOptions &TargetOpts)
}"
LLVM,RISCV,4006,std::string Result = Ret + (TT.isArchBigEndian() ? "<SOME_STR>" : "<SOME_OTHER_STR>");
LLVM,RISCV,4007,end
LLVM,RISCV,4008,"</s>

It is not possible for us to accurately predict the next statement without having knowledge of the context or variables used in this code snippet. The code may either continue executing with other statements or terminate depending on the logic of the program."
LLVM,RISCV,4009,"// RegisterTargetMachine <<ISA_LIT>AArch64TargetMachine> C(The<ISA_LIT>AArch64Target);

The next line would likely be a closing curly brace: ""}"""
LLVM,RISCV,4010,"The code snippet appears to be declaring a constructor for a <ISA_LIT>64TargetMachine class that inherits from a TargetMachine class, and passes in various parameters such as the target, triple, CPU, feature string, target options, relocation model, code model, and code generation optimization level. The next statement may be defining the body of the constructor, possibly initializing the inherited TargetMachine class."
LLVM,RISCV,4011,"The next statement will likely define the constructor for the <ISA_LIT>64TargetMachine, which will take in various arguments including Target, Triple, CPU, FS, TargetOptions, Reloc::Model, CodeModel::Model, and CodeGenOpt::Level, and call the constructor for <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine, passing in these arguments."
LLVM,RISCV,4012,This code snippet appears to define a class called "PassConfig" which inherits from "TargetPassConfig" and has a constructor that takes in a pointer to a "TargetMachine" and a reference to "PassManagerBase". The next statement could potentially be a function or variable declaration within the class.
LLVM,RISCV,4013,"</s>

ISA_LIT> addPass( <ISA_LIT>CreatePrintMachineInstructionPass(raw_ostream &Out, const std::string &Banner) );"
LLVM,RISCV,4014,"}

There will be a declaration for a variable called ""TLOF"" using the ""make_unique"" function."
LLVM,RISCV,4015,"</s>

It will return a value from the TLOF."
LLVM,RISCV,4016,"The next statement is a return statement that creates a new instance of the yaml::MachineFunctionInfo class, passing in the copy of the MFI object as an argument."
LLVM,RISCV,4017,return MFI->getTargetMachine();
LLVM,RISCV,4018,return TargetTransformInfo(F.getParent()->getDataLayout());
LLVM,RISCV,4019,"<< ""True""

There is no next statement of this code snippet. The code is already complete."
LLVM,RISCV,4020,YamlMFI is initialized with base yaml fields.
LLVM,RISCV,4021,"""The program will return a string literal if the architecture is 64-bit, otherwise it will assert that the architecture is 32-bit and return another string literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,4022,The code will either return "true" or "false".
LLVM,RISCV,4023,"PassConfig *conf = new TargetPassConfig(PM);


return conf;"
LLVM,RISCV,4024,"}
The next statement will likely be a closing bracket, indicating the end of the createPassConfig function."
LLVM,RISCV,4025,"If the condition CM is not met, the statement will return CodeModel::Small."
LLVM,RISCV,4026,Else return null ;
LLVM,RISCV,4027,// end of code snippet
LLVM,RISCV,4028,"This code snippet defines a new class called TargetMachine, which inherits from the LLVMTargetMachine class. It takes in several parameters such as the target, triple, CPU, and code generation options. It also creates a new object called TLOF which is an instance of the TargetLoweringObjectFileELF class."
LLVM,RISCV,4029,"The next statement is:
Subtarget.initializeSubtargetDependencies(TT, CPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,4030,"This statement initializes the TLOF object with a unique ELFTargetObjectFile and initializes the Subtarget object with the parameters TT, CPU, FS, and ""this""."
LLVM,RISCV,4031,"return <STR_LIT> ; }</s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of the variables TT and isArch64Bit."
LLVM,RISCV,4032,"return <STR_LIT> ; } }

if (TT.isArch32Bit()) { return <STR_LIT>; }"
LLVM,RISCV,4033,return TLOF;
LLVM,RISCV,4034,"return TargetMachine(T, computeDataLayout(TT), TT, CPU, FS, Options, getEffectiveRelocModel(TT, RM), CM, OL)"
LLVM,RISCV,4035,"</s>

throw new Exception(""Missing return statement after call to addGlobalInstructionSelect()."");"
LLVM,RISCV,4036,"</s>

 ""Return errors if global instruction selection of instruction has failed."""
LLVM,RISCV,4037,"</s>

Closing bracket for the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,4038,<s> } else { <s> return; }
LLVM,RISCV,4039,"}

It is likely that the next statement would be a call to a function or a declaration of a variable using the newly registered target machines. For example:

<ISA_LIT>32Target.init();
or
<ISA_LIT>64Target.setName(""X86_64"");"
LLVM,RISCV,4040,initialize<ISA_LIT>NarrowerToWidePass ( * PR ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4041,"=
return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,4042,<ERROR MESSAGE> // if there is no return statement in the function
LLVM,RISCV,4043,"</s>


""Throw an error if the architecture is not 32-bit and return the string literal."""
LLVM,RISCV,4044,"X.addPass(create<ISA_LIT>ISelDag(), false);
Y.addPass(create<ISA_LIT>ISelDag(), false);"
LLVM,RISCV,4045,This code sets the value of the TLOF variable by creating a unique ELF target object file.
LLVM,RISCV,4046,It is likely that the next statement will involve initializing another pass related to ISA_LIT (Instruction Set Architecture Literal).
LLVM,RISCV,4047,throw new Error("Unknown optimization level");
LLVM,RISCV,4048,addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>CFLAndersAAWrapperPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4049,"""return false;"""
LLVM,RISCV,4050,"</s>

return true"
LLVM,RISCV,4051,return false;
LLVM,RISCV,4052,The next statement is likely to be the closing curly brace ('}') or a semicolon (';') to end the statement or code block.
LLVM,RISCV,4053,"""// Code for post-register allocation functionality goes here"""
LLVM,RISCV,4054,"The next statement would be:
    </s> }"
LLVM,RISCV,4055,"""<s> run ""
create<ISA_LIT>ExpandAtomicPseudoPass ( )"
LLVM,RISCV,4056,"Add an ISA expansion pass



<s> addPass ( create<ISA_SRCPROTO>ExpandAtomicPseudoPass ( ) ) ; Add an ISA source protocol expansion pass"
LLVM,RISCV,4057,"}</s>

It will check the optimization level of the target machine and add the MergeBaseOffsetOptPass as a pre-register allocation pass if the optimization level is not set to None."
LLVM,RISCV,4058,"If no statement follows, the next statement is <s>}"
LLVM,RISCV,4059,"</s>

return;"
LLVM,RISCV,4060,std::vector<MachineOperand> VariantDatas = MI.getOperand(UXI).getVariantDatas();
LLVM,RISCV,4061,return true ;
LLVM,RISCV,4062,You cannot predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,4063,"""return  <STR_LIT> ;"""
LLVM,RISCV,4064,The code will return a statement containing the string "TT.isArch32Bit" with a 32-bit architecture and a string literal.
LLVM,RISCV,4065,"I = new SubtargetInfo(CPU, TuneCPU, FS);"
LLVM,RISCV,4066,"The next statement could be a conditional statement checking if a certain flag has been set in the parent module, and then potentially executing some code based on that information."
LLVM,RISCV,4067,"bool <
ISA_LIT>IsNoop = SrcAS == DstAS

return <ISA_LIT>IsNoop;"
LLVM,RISCV,4068,"return (SrcAS == DstAS); 

""If the source address space and destination address space are equal, return true."""
LLVM,RISCV,4069,initialize<ISA_LIT>GatherScatterLoweringPass ( * PR ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4070,<s> addPass ( create<RegisterSchedulerOptPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4071,The next statement could potentially be a call to another function or method within the PassConfig class or a return statement. This cannot be determined from the given code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,4072,"</s>

<span>
The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace (}) to end the if statement."
LLVM,RISCV,4073,initialize<ISA_LIT>TgtCompressOptPass(*PR);
LLVM,RISCV,4074,The next statement will be a call to the function "setMachineOutliner" with the argument "true".
LLVM,RISCV,4075,It is not possible to determine the next statement without further information about the variables and objects used in the code snippet.
LLVM,RISCV,4076,"</s>

addPass( create<ISA_LIT>DeadStoreEliminationPass() );"
LLVM,RISCV,4077,"I->initSubtargetFeatures(CPU, FS, ABIClass);"
LLVM,RISCV,4078,initialize<ISA_LIT>LoadStoreCompressionPass ( * PR ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4079,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement. It would depend on the specific code and the purpose of the addPass and addIRPasses functions. It is possible that the next statement could be another function call or a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,4080,<S> addPass ( createCheriCalleeAnalysisPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4081,">

""if ( ABI != <STR_LIT> && <STR_LIT> ( ABI ) ) {"""
LLVM,RISCV,4082,The next statement will be a return statement which will join all the declared variables and convert them into a string.
LLVM,RISCV,4083,return (SrcAS == DstAS);
LLVM,RISCV,4084,"<s>

""The constructor initializes the TLOF variable using the unique pointer to an ELFTargetObjectFile."""
LLVM,RISCV,4085,"}</s>

The next statement is likely to be:

I->adjustTargetOptions(F);"
LLVM,RISCV,4086,initialize<ISA_LIT>LegalizeTypesPass ( * PR ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4087,The next statement of the code snippet is: "isELF ( ) const = default ;".
LLVM,RISCV,4088,addPass (create<ISA_LIT>ExpandUnreachableBlockEliminationPass());
LLVM,RISCV,4089,create<ISA_LIT>ImmSam
LLVM,RISCV,4090,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,4091,"</s>
If the optimization level is not set to None, a pass for creating hardware loops will be added."
LLVM,RISCV,4092,The code snippet will create a new optimization pass for merging base offsets and add it to the list of optimization passes to be executed.
LLVM,RISCV,4093,"}

addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>InsJmpTblGenPass ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4094,The next statement of this code snippet is a call to the "initAsmInfo()" function.
LLVM,RISCV,4095,The next statement will call the function "initAsmInfo()".
LLVM,RISCV,4096,if ( ModuleTargetABI -> getString
LLVM,RISCV,4097,PR->registerPass(Y) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4098,"Call a function to initialize the global instruction selector on the PassRegistry, using the value of variable PR."
LLVM,RISCV,4099,"</s>

If the compiler optimization level is not CodeGenOpt :: None, then add a Pass to create PulpHWLoopsPass."
LLVM,RISCV,4100,"}


""Set up the target machine for <ISA_LIT> using the 32-bit target."""
LLVM,RISCV,4101,"This code snippet appears to be creating a function called ""addISelPrepare"" as part of a class called ""PassConfig."" The function inherits from a similar function in a class called ""TargetPassConfig."" The next line of code will likely contain the body of the function, possibly with additional statements or function calls."
LLVM,RISCV,4102,"} 

The next statement will likely be another function call to add a pass, possibly with the createJumpThreadingPass function."
LLVM,RISCV,4103,addPass ( create<ISA_LIT>ConstantPropagationPass ( ) ) ;
LLVM,RISCV,4104,There is not enough information available to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,RISCV,4105,"}


if (RM.hasValue()) {
return RM.getValue(); }"
LLVM,RISCV,4106,"</s>

The next statement is a constructor for the 64TargetMachine class, which takes in a Target object T, Triple object TT, StringRef objects CPU and FS, TargetOptions object Options, optional Reloc::Model object RM, CodeModel::Model object CM, and CodeGenOpt::Level object OL. It calls the constructor from the parent class TargetMachine with the specified parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,4107,The next statement will most likely be the opening curly brace for the constructor function.
LLVM,RISCV,4108,"}
The next statement of this code snippet is probably going to be some sort of function or method call related to initializing the TargetMachine or the AsmInfo for the machine."
LLVM,RISCV,4109,"</s>


It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,4110,"// If specific instruction selector exists, add it to the list."
LLVM,RISCV,4111,This code snippet creates a new pass for the ISelDag and adds it to the TargetMachine.
LLVM,RISCV,4112,"(For example switch their order)

<S> void <ISA_LIT>PassConfig :: addIRPasses ( ) { (For example switch their order) addPass ( createAtomicExpandPass ( ) ) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,4113,"</s>

<s><ISA_LIT>MIRBuilder.init();</s>

 MIRBuilder.setInstructionEmitter(llvm::createO2InstructionEmitter());"
LLVM,RISCV,4114,"}

<s> void <ISA_LIT>PassConfig :: addPostEmitPass ( ) { addPass ( & MachinePeepholePassID ) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,4115,It may call the function <ISA_LIT>ExpandPseudoPass to add a new pass.
LLVM,RISCV,4116,"</s>

<s> // add pre-register allocation logic here } </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,4117,"The next statement will likely be an assertion that verifies whether the system architecture is 32-bit, followed by a return statement with a string literal as its value."
LLVM,RISCV,4118,"}
<eos> TargetPassConfig *<ISA_LIT>TargetMachine::optPassConfig(PassManagerBase &PM) { return new<ISA_LIT>PassConfig(*this, PM) ; }"
LLVM,RISCV,4119,"</s>

 ""The createPassConfig function will return a new PassConfig object, passing in the current TargetMachine and PassManagerBase to initialize it."""
LLVM,RISCV,4120,Pass *ExpandPseudoPass = PR->getPass(ISA_LIT);
LLVM,RISCV,4121,initialize<ISA_LIT>ExpandPseudoPass(*PR);
LLVM,RISCV,4122,"The PassConfig class has been initialized with the TargetMachine and PassManagerBase objects, and is inheriting from the TargetPassConfig class using these objects as parameters."
LLVM,RISCV,4123,"</s>


return *new CBELoweringPass();"
LLVM,RISCV,4124,"}
The next statement is ""initAsmInfo();""."
LLVM,RISCV,4125,"}</s>

This code creates an instance of the <ISA_LIT>ELFTargetObjectFile class and calls the initAsmInfo() function."
LLVM,RISCV,4126,"}

It is not possible to make a prediction without seeing the code in its entirety."
LLVM,RISCV,4127,"}

<SEP> This statement checks whether the key extracted from the current ModuleFlagEntry is equal to a string literal. If it is, the code block will be executed."
LLVM,RISCV,4128,"DataSection = getContext ( ) . getELFSection ( <STR_LIT> , ELF :: SHT_PROGBITS , ELF :: SHF_WRITE | ELF :: SHF_ALLOC ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4129,"return llvm::TargetLoweringObjectFile::Initialize(Ctx, TM);"
LLVM,RISCV,4130,"""Check if the GlobalVariable GVA has external or common linkage and is not a declaration, then check if Ty is sized."""
LLVM,RISCV,4131,"</s>

It is likely that the statement following this code snippet would involve a conditional or a logical operation, as the code currently includes a comparison and a logical operator. Possible next statements could include: 
- An ""if"" statement that specifies what should happen if Size is between <NUM_LIT> and SSThreshold
- A ""while"" or ""for"" loop that repeats some code while Size is between <NUM_LIT> and SSThreshold
- An assignment statement that sets a variable or changes some data if the condition is met
- A function call that includes this code snippet as part of its execution steps"
LLVM,RISCV,4132,return SmallDataSection ;
LLVM,RISCV,4133,return RTM.getABIAlignment(Size);
LLVM,RISCV,4134,return nullptr;
LLVM,RISCV,4135,if (isReadOnlyData(C)) return SmallReadOnlyDataSection;
LLVM,RISCV,4136,"</s>

The next statement is likely to involve a command to save or manipulate the data stored in this particular section of the code."
LLVM,RISCV,4137,">

// This function initializes the target object file using the provided MCContext and TargetMachine."
LLVM,RISCV,4138,"""OS << <STR_LIT> << Attribute << <STR_LIT> << Twine ( Value ) << <STR_LIT> ;"" will print the value of the attribute and the given value to the output stream."
LLVM,RISCV,4139,<s> OS << <STR_LIT> << Attribute << <STR_LIT> << Twine ( Value ) << <STR_LIT> << <END_STATEMENT>;
LLVM,RISCV,4140,TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for <<: 'os' and 'str'
LLVM,RISCV,4141,return;
LLVM,RISCV,4142,I am unable to make a prediction as the code snippet is incomplete and lacks context. Please provide a more complete code snippet for me to make a prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,4143,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the rest of the code and understanding its context. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the code is attempting to output a string literal."
LLVM,RISCV,4144,"This code snippet is not complete, so it is not possible to predict the next statement. It is missing the ending characters that would indicate the end of a statement."
LLVM,RISCV,4145,Closing bracket for the function definition.
LLVM,RISCV,4146,<s> OS >> <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,4147,The next statement may be some sort of function or command to perform an operation on the operating system using the specified string literal as a parameter or input.
LLVM,RISCV,4148,"</s>

err ';' expected"
LLVM,RISCV,4149,OS << "\t.option rvc\n";
LLVM,RISCV,4150,",
	 llvm::emitTarget

llvm::emitTarget


The next statement would likely be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,RISCV,4151,The next statement is an if statement checking if the given Attribute is equal to a specific value.
LLVM,RISCV,4152,The next statement will be to use the ISAInfo variable to emit a target attribute.
LLVM,RISCV,4153,"The next statement is probably the end of the function definition, closing the curly braces and ending the emitTextAttribute() function."
LLVM,RISCV,4154,"The next statement of this code snippet will most likely be the closing curly brace, indicating the end of the finish() function."
LLVM,RISCV,4155,It is likely that the next statement will be closing the current section or moving on to the next section of code.
LLVM,RISCV,4156,This code snippet is missing a closing curly brace for the finishAttributeSection function.
LLVM,RISCV,4157,"-
The next statement of this code snippet would likely be a comment or documentation about the purpose or functionality of the ""finishAttributeSection"" method."
LLVM,RISCV,4158,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be another line of code within the reset() function."
LLVM,RISCV,4159,"}

void<ISA_LIT>TargetStreamer :: emitDirectiveValueComment ( const IntegerType ){

emitDirectiveValueComment(StringRef())

""emitDirectiveValueComment(StringRef())"""
LLVM,RISCV,4160,"""Initialize the TargetAsmStreamer class with the supplied MCStreamer and formatted_raw_ostream objects."""
LLVM,RISCV,4161,"</s>

return OS;"
LLVM,RISCV,4162,"}
The next statement is most likely to continue the function or class definition."
LLVM,RISCV,4163,"Since the code snippet does not specify any further statements, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement. It is likely that the code snippet will continue with additional definitions or function implementations related to the TargetStreamer class, but the specific details cannot be determined without further information."
LLVM,RISCV,4164,"</s>

""The assert statement compares the ABI to a string literal and fails if there is a match."""
LLVM,RISCV,4165,"</s>


The next statement will likely be ""}"" indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,4166,immediately closes the <STR_LIT> string and moves back to the OS.
LLVM,RISCV,4167,"}

""OS << """
LLVM,RISCV,4168,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It could repeat the same code or move on to a different section of code.
LLVM,RISCV,4169,"The next statement could be something like:
 
if (STI.hasFeature(<STR_LIT>)) Arch += <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,RISCV,4170,"The next statement would likely be an if statement or a return statement, as the code snippet seems to be performing a series of if/else checks on the STI variable."
LLVM,RISCV,4171,consumeError(ParseResult.takeError());
LLVM,RISCV,4172,"Check if the parse result was successful, and if not, consume the error and make the program unreachable. Otherwise, continue with the program."
LLVM,RISCV,4173,There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. It will depend on the code within the "if" statement and the value of STI . hasFeature (<STR_LIT>).
LLVM,RISCV,4174,<if ( STI . hasFeature ( <STR_LIT> ) ) Arch += <STR_LIT> ;>
LLVM,RISCV,4175,There will be no more statements executed since the if statement has no else statement following it.
LLVM,RISCV,4176,There is no way to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code. It is possible that the code could continue to add <STR_LIT> or it could move on to a different statement or function.
LLVM,RISCV,4177,"Since there is no code after this snippet, the next statement cannot be predicted. The snippet may end here or there may be additional code after it."
LLVM,RISCV,4178,The next statement could be another if statement or a return statement.
LLVM,RISCV,4179,if (PowDiff <= 0) return 1;
LLVM,RISCV,4180,"return <NUM_LIT>; 

The next statement could be a return statement that returns the value of Cost added to the difference between the first element of LT and another numerical literal."
LLVM,RISCV,4181,"Assuming that the condition of the if statement is true, the predicted next statement would be ""return BaseT::getMaskedMemoryOpCost(Opcode, Src, Alignment, AddressSpace, CostKind)""."
LLVM,RISCV,4182,"return BaseT :: getMaskedMemoryOpCost ( Opcode , Src , Alignment , AddressSpace , CostKind ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4183,"the code will return the maximum interleaving factor, using the ST structure to get the value."
LLVM,RISCV,4184,else return <NUM_LIT> ;
LLVM,RISCV,4185,"If the first if statement is false, the next statement will return BaseT::getMinMaxReductionCost(Ty, CondTy, IsUnsigned, CostKind)."
LLVM,RISCV,4186,"""<STR_LIT>"""
LLVM,RISCV,4187,"I am sorry, I am an AI and I do not have access to the full code snippet. Can you please provide more context?"
LLVM,RISCV,4188,return <STR_LIT>TTI::ARVRegisterUsage ;
LLVM,RISCV,4189,if (Kind == TTI::SK_Broadcast && isa<ScalableVectorType>(Tp)) return LT.first * <NUM_LIT>
LLVM,RISCV,4190,"""If Kind is equal to TTI :: SK_Broadcast and Tp is a scalable vector type, return the product of LT.first and <NUM_LIT>."""
LLVM,RISCV,4191,"The next statement could possibly be a ""return"" statement, where the splice cost for the given vector type and index is returned."
LLVM,RISCV,4192,return LT.first * Index + Cost;
LLVM,RISCV,4193,The next statement is "UP.Partial = true;".
LLVM,RISCV,4194,return (DataType != nullptr && Alignment > 0);
LLVM,RISCV,4195,"<s> Have it return isLegalMaskedScatter ( DataType , Alignment ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4196,"The code will end and return the result of the isLegalElementTypeForRVV function, passing in the scalar type of the given data type."
LLVM,RISCV,4197,The code will return the result of the function "isLegalMaskedLoadStore" using the parameters "DataType" and "Alignment".
LLVM,RISCV,4198,"This statement will check if the masked load/store operation is legal for the given data type and alignment, and return a boolean value indicating the result."
LLVM,RISCV,4199,The next statement will check if the alignment is less than the size of the scalar type of DataType and return the result of isLegalElementTypeForRVV.
LLVM,RISCV,4200,if (ST->getMaxRVVVectorSizeInBits() < <NUM_LIT>) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,4201,"<s>

It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the context and purpose of the code snippet. It could be a conditional statement, a variable assignment, or a function call."
LLVM,RISCV,4202,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,4203,"The code is likely to return false if the recurrence kind is not one of Add, FAdd, And, or Or."
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,RISCV,4204,"</s>

Will appear a return statement with some expression determining the result of the supportsScalableVectors function."
LLVM,RISCV,4205,"</s>

There is not enough information to predict the next statement. The next statement will depend on the rest of the code and its purpose."
LLVM,RISCV,4206,The next statement would be "return TTI::TCC_Free;".
LLVM,RISCV,4207,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,4208,if (isa <FixedVectorType> (DataType) && DataType->getNumElements() > ST->getMaxRVVVectorSizeInElements()) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,4209,return true;
LLVM,RISCV,4210,")


""return TTI::TCC_Basic"""
LLVM,RISCV,4211,std::cout << DL.getStringRepresentation() << std::endl;
LLVM,RISCV,4212,"</s>

'Use the reference vector variable with fixed vector length. Else return numerical value.""
""Set return value to numerical value."""
LLVM,RISCV,4213,"Most likely, the code snippet will return a numerical literal (represented by <NUM_LIT>) if the ST (symbol table) has V (virtual) instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,4214,<p>The next statement is "return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,4215,"""You successfully performed the necessary checks and can continue with the next function call."""
LLVM,RISCV,4216,"</s>

None, as this is the end of the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,4217,"</s>

if (Pointer < ReturnType > = ST -> getPointerType(AlignData))
return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,4218,The next statement would be a closing curly brace to end the switch statement.
LLVM,RISCV,4219,"return

false"
LLVM,RISCV,4220,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the code contained within the "hasVInstructions" function or the context in which the snippet is used.
LLVM,RISCV,4221,"return Qfalse; }
No prediction can be made without further context or information about the code snippet."
LLVM,RISCV,4222,"if (Idx >= 0 && Idx < MaxIdx)     

The next statement will check if the index (Idx) is within the specified range, by comparing it to 0 and the maximum index (MaxIdx)."
LLVM,RISCV,4223,"</s>

The next statement could be:

<s> return ST -> getMaxRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) ; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,4224,The next statement could be another conditional statement or the end of the function with a return value.
LLVM,RISCV,4225,FALSE
LLVM,RISCV,4226,"}

The next statement could be ""if (L->getNumBlocks() == 0) return;"". This would check if there are no basic blocks in the loop, and if so, return."
LLVM,RISCV,4227,if (UP.UpperBound) {enable optimization} else {disable optimization}
LLVM,RISCV,4228,"}</s>

The next statement will be to return the minimum vector size in bits for RISC-V vector instructions."
LLVM,RISCV,4229,TypeSize::getFixed(ST->hasVInstructions() ? ST->getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits() : <NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,RISCV,4230,The next statement is likely to be a closing bracket or an end of statement symbol. It can also possibly be a comment explaining the purpose of the code or a function call with the return value from the previous statement.
LLVM,RISCV,4231,"if (Imm.isZero())
  return TTI::TCC_Basic;
else
  return TTI::TCC_Expensive;"
LLVM,RISCV,4232,ImmArgIdx = <NUM_LIT + 1>;
LLVM,RISCV,4233,return TTI :: TCC_Basic ;
LLVM,RISCV,4234,"}

The code snippet will return the cost as TTI::TCC_Free."
LLVM,RISCV,4235,"}
After checking for any loop latches in the current basic block, the code will then decrement the instruction count and continue to check the next instruction."
LLVM,RISCV,4236,"If I . isTerminator ( ) returns true, then the code will return false."
LLVM,RISCV,4237,"</s>

Assuming the current statement returned false, the next statement would likely be:

return false;"
LLVM,RISCV,4238,"}
The next statement is ""}"" which marks the end of the function."
LLVM,RISCV,4239,"The next statement will be: return getIntImmCost(Imm, Ty);"
LLVM,RISCV,4240,There is not enough information to provide a prediction.
LLVM,RISCV,4241,"None of the above conditions are met, therefore the code will not return any value and will continue to the next statement outside of the if statements."
LLVM,RISCV,4242,Error: 'Ty' has not been declared.
LLVM,RISCV,4243,The next statement is: UP.Partial = true;
LLVM,RISCV,4244,">

There are several if-statements that check the vector type and return a BaseT function if the corresponding conditions are met. Another if-statement checks if the scalar size of the vector type is larger than the maximum allowed, in which case it also returns a BaseT function."
LLVM,RISCV,4245,"This code snippet seems to be evaluating the cost of an arithmetic reduction operation for a given vector type. It first checks if the scalar size in bits of the vector type is greater than a maximum value specified by the target execution environment. If so, it returns the cost of the operation using the ""getArithmeticReductionCost"" function. Otherwise, it continues with the next statement, which converts the given instruction opcode to its corresponding ISD (Instruction Selection DAG) code using the TLI (Target Lowering Interface) and asserts its value. If the ISD code is not equal to one of the specified values, the code returns"
LLVM,RISCV,4246,"The next statement could be a closing curly brace (}) to close the if statement, followed by a closing curly brace for the switch statement."
LLVM,RISCV,4247,"return BaseT :: getMinMaxReductionCost ( Ty , CondTy , IsUnsigned , CostKind ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4248,"The next statement will return the cost of a shuffle operation based on the type, mask, and index given."
LLVM,RISCV,4249,"The code will return the size of a fixed width vector if the target has a standard extension for vectors, otherwise it will return the minimum vector size in bits."
LLVM,RISCV,4250,"return TypeSize :: getFixed ( ST -> getXLen ( ) ) ;

case TargetTransformInfo :: RGK_VectorReduction : return TypeSize :: getFixed ( ST -> getXLen ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,RISCV,4251,if (isa <FixedVectorType> (DataType) && ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) == <NUM_LIT> + 1) return false;
LLVM,RISCV,4252,"if (isa < FixedVectorType> (DataType) && ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) == <NUM_LIT> )
  return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,4253,The next statement will return true.
LLVM,RISCV,4254,case RecurKind :: Mul:
LLVM,RISCV,4255,"The next statement is:
return TTI::TCC_Free;"
LLVM,RISCV,4256,The code will return the boolean result from the function call to TLI -> isLegalElementTypeForRVV ( DataType -> getScalarType ( ) ).
LLVM,RISCV,4257,The code will return the boolean value "false".
LLVM,RISCV,4258,if ( isa < FixedVectorType > ( DataType ) && DataType -> getScalarSizeInBits ( ) <= ST -> getELEN ( ) ) return true ;
LLVM,RISCV,4259,"Prediction:
return true;"
LLVM,RISCV,4260,"return false ; }</s>

The code will return false if none of the cases in the switch statement match the recurrence kind of the RdxDesc object."
LLVM,RISCV,4261,"The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace, ending the if statement and function definition."
LLVM,RISCV,4262,"The code will return BaseT::getGatherScatterOpCost(Opcode, DataTy, Ptr, VariableMask, Alignment, CostKind, I) if the FixedVectorType is not a fixed vector type."
LLVM,RISCV,4263,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a conditional statement, checking if the variable Imm is equal to another value."
LLVM,RISCV,4264,{ return TTI :: TCC_Free ; }
LLVM,RISCV,4265,"""return BaseT::getMaxVScale();"""
LLVM,RISCV,4266,3. <s> return true;
LLVM,RISCV,4267,"support_kinds Result = PSK_FastHardware;

if (TTIImpl->getBinaryOpCost(Instruction::And, VectorType::getInteger(TyWidth, true)) < TTIImpl->getPopcntSupportThreshold()) {
   Result = PSK_Software;
}

PSK_Software"
LLVM,RISCV,4268,"</s>

<s> return *ST; </s>"
LLVM,RISCV,4269,"}
 
The code snippet defines a function to return a const pointer to the ISA_LIT Subtarget object, named ""getST,"" and indicates that the function is a constant function."
LLVM,RISCV,4270,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,RISCV,4271,This code creates a TTIImpl object using the provided <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine object and the given function.
LLVM,RISCV,4272,"</s>

""This constructor function defines a TTIImpl object that takes in a TargetMachine pointer and Function object, and initializes the BaseT, ST, and TLI members using data from these parameters."""
LLVM,RISCV,4273,"return true

default: return false;

case <STR_LIT>: return true"
LLVM,ARC,0,"</s>


</s> ISA_LITAsmPrinter *AP = new <ISA_LIT>AsmPrinter(getThe<ISA_LIT>Target()); </s>"
LLVM,ARC,1,It is likely that the next statement will be calling a function or method on the registered AsmPrinter object.
LLVM,ARC,2,"</s>

This code snippet defines a function called ""EmitInstruction"", which takes a constant pointer to a MachineInstr as its input parameter. Within the function, a SmallString variable called ""Str"" is declared, with a size of <NUM_LIT>. This variable is then used to create a raw_svector_ostream object called ""O"". The function also includes a switch statement that checks for the opcode of the MachineInstr and performs a specific action if it matches the <STR_LIT> case. Finally, a MCInst variable called ""TmpInst"" is declared, and an object called MCInstLowering is used to"
LLVM,ARC,3,"Most likely, the next statement will be a return statement that casts the output streamer into a TargetStreamer object and returns that object."
LLVM,ARC,4,return targetStreamer;
LLVM,ARC,5,"</s>

The next statement could be ""return false;"" indicating that the function did not run successfully."
LLVM,ARC,6,This code snippet creates an AsmPrinter object using a TargetMachine and a unique_ptr of MCStreamer as input parameters. It then initializes the AsmPrinter and MCInstLowering objects with the specified parameters.
LLVM,ARC,7,"</s>

The next statement is likely to define the destructor function for the AsmPrinter class."
LLVM,ARC,8,return O.str();
LLVM,ARC,9,Error: Missing a closing quotation mark.
LLVM,ARC,10,"</s>


""Semicolon, return the name of the current pass as a StringRef."""
LLVM,ARC,11,Error: missing semi-colon.
LLVM,ARC,12,"}

It is likely that the code will return a boolean value indicating whether or not the AsmPrinter has successfully run on the given MachineFunction."
LLVM,ARC,13,"}

The prediction is that the code will execute the if statement and call the BuildMI function with multiple arguments, including the getCCForBRcc function with the MI operand."
LLVM,ARC,14,"BuildMI(*MI->getParent(), MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(getBRccForPseudo(MI))).addMBB(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getMBB()).addReg(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).add(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)).addImm(getCCForBRcc(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getImm())).eraseFromParent();"
LLVM,ARC,15,"}
It looks like the code is adding a comparison instruction and then adding a jump instruction to a basic block. Finally, the current instruction is erased from the parent."
LLVM,ARC,16,"The next statement could be ""BuildMI(*MI->getParent(), MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(getCmpForPseudo(MI))).addReg(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getReg()).add(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)).execute()"" which would execute the instruction represented by this MI (Machine Instruction). Alternatively, it could be ""BuildMI(*MI->getParent(), MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(<STR_LIT>)).addMBB(MI->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>).getMBB()).addImm(M"
LLVM,ARC,17,"""DEBUG(dbgs() << 'Branch instruction detected.' << '\n');"""
LLVM,ARC,18,"} }

The next statement in this code snippet is ""MaxSize -= Size;"". This would be the statement that is executed if the above if-statement evaluates to false."
LLVM,ARC,19,This code initializes the BranchFinalizePass object with the PassRegistry.
LLVM,ARC,20,"}

The next statement would be the closing curly brace for the function."
LLVM,ARC,21,"}

It seems likely that the next statement would be a return statement, as the if statement is checking for a specific opcode and the assert statement ensures that the input MI is a valid instruction for this function. However, without more context or information about what the function is supposed to do, it is impossible to accurately predict the exact return value."
LLVM,ARC,22,"""The default case will be executed."""
LLVM,ARC,23,It is not possible to predict the next statement without seeing the actual code.
LLVM,ARC,24,return "the code block following this statement will run if CC does not equal negative <NUM_LIT>"
LLVM,ARC,25,MI -> eraseFromParent ();
LLVM,ARC,26,The next statement would add an instruction to the IR representing a comparison operation using the operands obtained from the previous instruction.
LLVM,ARC,27,I'm not able to predict the next statement without more context or information about the code snippet.
LLVM,ARC,28,Branches .push_back ( & MI . getName ( ) ) ;<STR_LIT>}
LLVM,ARC,29,<STR_LIT> End of loop <STR_LIT>
LLVM,ARC,30,This code is using a static assertion to ensure that the value of B is larger than the given number literal. The next statement will call the DecodeSymbolicOperandOff function with the appropriate parameters and then return a success code from the MCDisassembler class.
LLVM,ARC,31,The code will return "MCDisassembler::Success".
LLVM,ARC,32,"Error encountered while evaluating

static_cast<int> (InsnS) : -<NUM_LIT>) );"
LLVM,ARC,33,"This code snippet is defining a function called ""DecodeGBR32ShortRegister"" which takes in four parameters: a reference to an ""MCInst"" object, an unsigned integer ""RegNo"", a 64-bit integer ""Address"", and a constant pointer to ""Decoder"". The function checks if the ""RegNo"" is greater than a certain value and then adds a certain value to it. Finally, the function returns the result of calling another function called ""DecodeGPR32RegisterClass"" with the updated ""RegNo"" as a parameter."
LLVM,ARC,34,"</s>

This code snippet will add an operand to an instruction, using a GPR32DecoderTable to retrieve the appropriate register and create a corresponding MCOperand."
LLVM,ARC,35,"}
The next statement would be ""else"", followed by a block of code."
LLVM,ARC,36,"""The instruction's destination A field is decoded and the corresponding GPR32 register class is identified. The immediate value from the instruction is extracted and added as an operand to the instruction."""
LLVM,ARC,37,LLVM_DEBUG( dbgs () << <STR_LIT> );
LLVM,ARC,38,"The next statement will likely involve decoding the instruction using the GPR32 register class, specifying the instruction, the register R, the address, and a variable for the decoded instruction."
LLVM,ARC,39,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SignExtend32 <<NUM_LIT>>(S9)));
LLVM,ARC,40,DecodeRegisterOrImm is a lambda expression that decodes a register or immediate field and adds it as an operand to the MCInst object being modified in the DecodeMoveHRegInstruction function.
LLVM,ARC,41,"} 

Inst.addOperand ( MCOperand :: createImm ( Value + <NUM_LIT> ) )"
LLVM,ARC,42,""", B must be greater than <NUM_LIT>."""
LLVM,ARC,43,Store the decoded 32-bit general-purpose register class instruction in a variable called "LImm".
LLVM,ARC,44,return (nullptr != Disassembler);
LLVM,ARC,45,"if the Disassembler is successful in adding a symbolic operand for the given instruction, then return a non-null value."
LLVM,ARC,46,<s> // Function definition for DecodeSymbolicOperandOff
LLVM,ARC,47,The next statement is most likely another function or statement that uses the variables and parameters defined in the current function.
LLVM,ARC,48,"<s>

""LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""No matching instruction table for this decoder!\n"");"""
LLVM,ARC,49,"Result = decodeInstruction ( DecoderTable48 , Instr , Insn48 , Address , this , STI ) ; if ( Success == Result ) { LLVM_DEBUG ("
LLVM,ARC,50,The next statement could be to set up parameters for the disassembler or to include code from another function.
LLVM,ARC,51,"""return MCDisassembler :: Success;"""
LLVM,ARC,52,Inst.execute();
LLVM,ARC,53,It is not possible to predict the next statement without more context.
LLVM,ARC,54,Inst.addOperand (MCOperand::createImm (Result));
LLVM,ARC,55,"Field U7 = fieldFromInstruction ( Insn , <NUM_LIT> , <NUM_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,56,The next statement will return the value of MCDisassembler::Success.
LLVM,ARC,57,"The next statement is: 
{return Disassembler->tryAddingSymbolicOperand(Inst, Value, Address, true, NUM_LIT, AtLeast);}"
LLVM,ARC,58,The next statement of this code snippet could be creating a variable or calling a function using the parameters provided.
LLVM,ARC,59,"The next statement would likely involve using the ""AtLeast"" variable in some way, such as in a comparison or assignment."
LLVM,ARC,60,std::cout << "B Field decoded: " << Field << std::endl;
LLVM,ARC,61,returning 1 indicates successful completion of the operation.
LLVM,ARC,62,return MCDisassembler::Fail;
LLVM,ARC,63,"if (S < 0) {
return MCDisassembler::Fail;
} else {
return MCDisassembler::Success;
}"
LLVM,ARC,64,"The next statement will most likely be the end of the function, indicating that the operation was successful."
LLVM,ARC,65,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg2));
LLVM,ARC,66,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(0));
LLVM,ARC,67,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the values of Insn, NUM_LIT, and S9. However, based on the code structure, it is likely that the next statement would decode a GPR32 register class, add an operand to the instruction, and return a success status for the disassembler."
LLVM,ARC,68,<s> Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createImm ( SignExtend32 < <NUM_LIT> > ( <NUM_LIT> & InsnS12 & 0xFFFFFFFF ) ) ) ;
LLVM,ARC,69,<s> Inst .addOperand ( MCOperand::createImm (SignExtend32 <<NUM_LIT>> (<NUM_LIT> & InsnS12)))); //Add a new operand to the instruction with a 32-bit sign-extended immediate value of the result of shifting <<NUM_LIT>> by the value of InsnS12.
LLVM,ARC,70,"Nothing, as this code snippet ends with a return statement."
LLVM,ARC,71,return MCDisassembler::Success;
LLVM,ARC,72,if (SrcC != <NUM_LIT>) { DEBUG(dbgs() << <STR_LIT>); return MCDisassembler::Fail; }
LLVM,ARC,73,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(<NUM_LIT>));
LLVM,ARC,74,"}

""if (Bytes.size() >= <NUM_LIT>) { Result = Success; }"""
LLVM,ARC,75,"Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable32, Instr, Insn32, Address, this, STI);"
LLVM,ARC,76,Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(DstA));
LLVM,ARC,77,"if ( decodeDField ( Insn ) == <NUM_LIT> ) {
  DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << <STR_LIT> ) ;
  return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
}

or

if ( decodeDField ( Insn ) != <NUM_LIT> ) {
  DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << <STR_LIT> ) ;
  return MCDisassembler :: Success ;
}"
LLVM,ARC,78,"""Semi-colon added at the end of the code snippet"""
LLVM,ARC,79,"DIm = (Insn >> <NUM_DUMMY>) ;
MCInstBuilder :: addImm ( Inst , LImm ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,80,"} uint16_t Insn24 ; if ( ! readInstruction24 ( Bytes , Address , Size , Insn24 ) ) { return Fail ; } return decodeInstruction ( DecoderTable24 , Instr , Insn24 , Address , this , STI ) ;


If the condition is met, the code will execute instruction decoding using the appropriate decoder table (DecoderTable64, DecoderTable32, DecoderTable48, or DecoderTable24) and return the result (Success, Fail, or Result)."
LLVM,ARC,81,"<e>

The next statement is a curly bracket closing off the class declaration."
LLVM,ARC,82,"</s>

""return a MCDisassembler object using the provided MCSubtargetInfo and MCContext"""
LLVM,ARC,83,"}

 This function creates a new <ISA_LIT>Disassembler object using the provided Target, MCSubtargetInfo, and MCContext objects."
LLVM,ARC,84,return Insn ;
LLVM,ARC,85,"I'm sorry, I cannot predict the outcome of a code snippet as it is dependent on the specific code within the function and the inputs it may receive."
LLVM,ARC,86,"I'm sorry, I am not able to predict the next statement as it depends on the specific code implementation and can vary."
LLVM,ARC,87,"DecodeNextInstruction(Inst, Address, SignExtend32<B>(InsnS), Decoder);"
LLVM,ARC,88,Inst.clear();
LLVM,ARC,89,const unsigned max = ( <NUM_LIT> << B ) - (<NUM_LIT> * 2);
LLVM,ARC,90,"It is not possible to predict the next statement without more information about the code. The variables <NUM_LIT> and B could have any numerical values, making the result of the statement unpredictable."
LLVM,ARC,91,"decodeRegisterClass(Decoder, GBR32RegisterClassID, RegNo, Inst); }
return;"
LLVM,ARC,92,The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function for decoding a GBR32 short register.
LLVM,ARC,93,"}

'static'"
LLVM,ARC,94,It is not possible to predict the next statement as there is not enough information provided.
LLVM,ARC,95,"The next statement will likely be

MCInst::addOperand(MCOperand::createImm((uint32_t)(Insn >> <NUM_LIT>)));"
LLVM,ARC,96,This code snippet likely decodes the GPR32 register class using the result of the bitwise operation in the previous line.
LLVM,ARC,97,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely a closing curly brace to end the auto function, followed by a semicolon."
LLVM,ARC,98,</SCOPE> The code will add an operand of type MCOperand created from the result of SignExtend32 <B> (maskTrailingOnes <decltype(InsnS)> (B) & InsnS).
LLVM,ARC,99,Field Combined = Lower | Upper;
LLVM,ARC,100,This code snippet adds a field from the instruction to the operands of the instruction using <NUM_LIT> and <NUM_LIT> as input values.
LLVM,ARC,101,"This code snippet defines a static function called DecodeSOPwithRU6 that takes in an MCInst, an Insn, and an Address as parameters and returns a DecodeStatus."
LLVM,ARC,102,This code snippet is incomplete and does not have enough information to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,ARC,103,"""<NUM_LIT> represents the minimum symbol size for decoding."""
LLVM,ARC,104,#NextAddress -Offset
LLVM,ARC,105,The next statement will be to add an operand to the instruction that creates an Unsigned 64-bit integer with the value of the variable "Offset".
LLVM,ARC,106,"if (Bytes.size() < NUM_LIT) {
  return Fail;
}"
LLVM,ARC,107,The next statement will likely involve registering the target with a function or method call that includes some form of the target's name.
LLVM,ARC,108,"The next statement is ""Insn = <NUM_LIT>;"", which assigns the value of <NUM_LIT> to the variable Insn."
LLVM,ARC,109,"</s>

<s> Color = blue;</s>"
LLVM,ARC,110,The code will return true.
LLVM,ARC,111,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the specific values of the variables and functions in the code. However, based on the given information, it is likely that the next statement will involve using the virtual register Rb and creating a machine instruction using the virtual register Ra and the source structure Src."
LLVM,ARC,112,"This code snippet is adding a new instruction to the parent instruction, with destination variable ""Dest"" and integer literal and string literal parameters. It then adds a register ""R"" as the final parameter."
LLVM,ARC,113,"</s>


if (Dest.getReg() == <ISA_LIT>X86::EAX) {
    BuildMI(MF, MII, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII.get(<ISA_LIT>X86::CTTZ32r), <ISA_LIT>Dest.getReg());
} else {
    BuildMI(MF, MII, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII.get(<ISA_LIT>X86::CTTZ32m), <ISA_LIT>Dest.getReg()).addOperand(MI.getOperand(1)).addOperand(MI.getOperand(2));
}"
LLVM,ARC,114,The statement "SI . eraseFromParent ( ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,115,"The next statement will use the BuildMI function to add a new machine instruction in the code, using the operands and registers defined in the previous statements."
LLVM,ARC,116,"break ;

case <STR_LIT>: expandStore(MF, NMBBI); Expanded = true; break;"
LLVM,ARC,117,return true;
LLVM,ARC,118,ExpandPseudos will be executed as a part of the MachineFunctionPass with an ID parameter.
LLVM,ARC,119,"The next statement in this code snippet is:
BuildMI (*SI.getParent(), SI, SI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(getMappedOp(SI.getOpcode())))"
LLVM,ARC,120,This code snippet is erasing something from its parent.
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,ARC,121,"</s>

""Break;"""
LLVM,ARC,122,"}

There is no default case in this switch statement, so the code will exit the switch block without returning anything."
LLVM,ARC,123,It is not possible to predict the next statement since there is no context provided.
LLVM,ARC,124,"The next statement of this code snippet could be:

return ""Pass Name"";"
LLVM,ARC,125,"ptr = new Node ; ptr -> data <

ptr->data = <INT_LIT>;"
LLVM,ARC,126,return 'RS.set(<STR_LIT>)'
LLVM,ARC,127,"</s>

The next statement could be an ""if"" statement since the previous statement used an ""if"" statement."
LLVM,ARC,128,"The next statement could be another ""if"" statement checking if the current function is a variadic function, followed by a call to the ""dbgs"" function with a string as an argument."
LLVM,ARC,129,"}

BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI),
TII -> get (<STR_LIT>), RegState :: Implicit | RegState :: Kill)
.addReg (<STR_LIT>).addReg (<STR_LIT>).addImm (<NUM_LIT>)"
LLVM,ARC,130,"CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createOffset(nullptr, MRI->getDwarfRegNum(Reg, true), MFI.getObjectOffset(FI)));"
LLVM,ARC,131,"}

The next statement would be:

Debug statement printing out the message specified in the previous line, using the machine function's name."
LLVM,ARC,132,"</s>

The next statement is probably going to be another debug statement, possibly printing out information about the callee saved registers or the target register info."
LLVM,ARC,133,return Last;
LLVM,ARC,134,The next statement is <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,ARC,135,if (Reg.getReg() <= Last) print(Last)
LLVM,ARC,136,The next statement would be: "if (isInt<<<NUM_LIT>>(MoveAmount))  Opc = <STR_LIT>;"
LLVM,ARC,137,"return MachineBasicBlock :: iterator ( MBBI ) ; }

The next statement could be ""MFI.getStackSize() = MFI.getStackSize() + AFI->MaxCallStackReq"". This statement updates the stack size by adding the maximum required call stack size from the previous if-statement."
LLVM,ARC,138,This snippet does not contain enough information to make a prediction.
LLVM,ARC,139,"The next statement will be ""BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , dl , TII . get ( AdjOp ) , StackPtr ) . addReg ( StackPtr ) . addImm ( AbsAmount ) ;"""
LLVM,ARC,140,"}

This code snippet seems to be an implementation of a function that generates a stack adjustment. The next statement would likely be either a conditional statement or a function call that manipulates the stack according to the adjustments calculated earlier in the code."
LLVM,ARC,141,"If the UseSaveRestoreFunclet is true and Last is greater than <STR_LIT>, the function will return true."
LLVM,ARC,142,"Reg = Entry . getReg ( ) ;

CFIIndex = MF . addFrameInst ( MCCFIInstruction :: createOffset ( nullptr , MRI -> getDwarfRegNum ( Reg , true ) , CurOffset ) ) ; BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , dl , TII -> get ( TargetOpcode :: CFI_INSTRUCTION ) ) . addCFIIndex ( CFIIndex ) . setMIFlags ( MachineInstr :: FrameSetup ) ; CurOffset -= Entry . getFrameSize ( ) ; }"
LLVM,ARC,143,No prediction can be made as the code snippet is incomplete.
LLVM,ARC,144,<STR_LIT> RegScavFI <STR_LIT>
LLVM,ARC,145,"return ""Use the LLVM debugger to output a string literal and the name of the parent block of MBB. Then, determine the last callee save and check if it is greater than a string literal. If this is true, use the save and restore funclet function."""
LLVM,ARC,146,NoNextStatementThis code snippet instantiates a new FrameLowering object using the Subtarget class and initializes its TargetFrameLowering base class with specified parameters.
LLVM,ARC,147,return nullptr;
LLVM,ARC,148,Skip to the next line of code in the for loop that parses through the CSI vector.
LLVM,ARC,149,RS.set(<STR_LIT>);
LLVM,ARC,150,"assert

false"
LLVM,ARC,151,"BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(<STR_LIT>), <STR_LIT>) .addReg(<STR_LIT>, RegState::Implicit | RegState::Undef) .addImm(StackSize - AmountAboveFunclet);"
LLVM,ARC,152,"BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , MBB . findDebugLoc ( MBBI ) , TII -> get ( <STR_LIT> ) ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ) . addReg ( <STR_LIT> ). addImm ( StackSlotsUsedByFunclet ) ;

The next statement will be a check whether or not the stack size minus the amount above the funclet is nonzero, followed by a call to the BuildMI function."
LLVM,ARC,153,"The code will check if the absolute value of the amount is a multiple of 4, and if Affirmative is true, the value of AdjOp will be set to the string ""Add"". Otherwise, if isUInt<4> is false (meaning the amount is not a multiple of 4), the value of AdjOp will be set to the string ""Sub""."
LLVM,ARC,154,"Ideally, there should be a comment explaining the purpose of generateStackAdjustment function."
LLVM,ARC,155,DEBUG (dbgs() << <STR_LIT> << "Allocated stack object at index " << RegScavFI << " for register class " << RC->getName() << <STR_LIT>);
LLVM,ARC,156,"}

The next statement would be: ""RS->ensureMaxScavengingRegs(MFI.getNumObjects());"""
LLVM,ARC,157,It is not possible to predict the next statement without context or knowledge of the variables and functions used in the code snippet.
LLVM,ARC,158,The next statement would likely be a conditional statement evaluating the value of "UseSaveRestoreFunclet" compared to the value of "Last".
LLVM,ARC,159,The next statement will be a conditional statement or an assignment statement using the variable "HasFP".
LLVM,ARC,160,"</s>

False"
LLVM,ARC,161,There is not enough context to accurately predict the next statement.
LLVM,ARC,162,The next statement will likely involve accessing or manipulating the frame stack to allocate or deallocate memory.
LLVM,ARC,163,"// Initialize TargetFrameLowering object with stack growth direction set to ""StackGrowsDown"", and passing in <NUM_LIT> and <NUM_LIT> as parameters. Save the Subtarget object passed in as ""ST""."
LLVM,ARC,164,"The code will continue to initialize the TargetFrameLowering object with the StackGrowsDown setting, and the values of two NUM_LIT variables."
LLVM,ARC,165,"If (I.getReg() <= <STR_LIT>)
MFI.setObjectOffset(RegI->getFrameIdx(), CurOffset);"
LLVM,ARC,166,Predict the instruction call print <STR_LIT> to MF.getName().
LLVM,ARC,167,"}

MF . getFunction ( )"
LLVM,ARC,168,"This code snippet is checking if the value of the register ""Reg"" falls within a certain range, and if so, the value of ""Last"" is updated to equal the value of ""Reg."""
LLVM,ARC,169,if ( Reg . getReg ( ) < Last ) Last = Reg . getReg ( ) ; } return Last ;
LLVM,ARC,170,Would the program report an error if the assert statement is not true?
LLVM,ARC,171,"}

addImm(1)

The next statement of this code snippet is:

BuildMI (MBB, MBBI, dl, TII->get(Opc), Reg).addReg(Reg, RegState::Kill).addImm(NumBytes);"
LLVM,ARC,172,The assert statement will check if AbsAmount is equal to 0 and print the corresponding debug message.
LLVM,ARC,173,"<s>

}}"
LLVM,ARC,174,"</s>

If the condition statement is not met, the loop will end and there will be no return value."
LLVM,ARC,175,The code will return the value of the boolean variable "HasFP".
LLVM,ARC,176,"</s>

The next statement could be a return statement, as the code appears to be calculating and storing a boolean value in the variable HasFP."
LLVM,ARC,177,LLVM_DEBUG (dbgs() << <STR_LIT> << RC->getName() << <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,ARC,178,"}

The next statement may continue to define conditions for when the function should return true."
LLVM,ARC,179,O.flush()
LLVM,ARC,180,"The program will output the string literal variable ""cc"", then return the string literal ""<STR_LIT>""."
LLVM,ARC,181,The next statement of the code snippet could possibly be a default statement or an end of switch statement.
LLVM,ARC,182,"The next statement would likely be ""break;"", as it is generally used after each ""case"" statement in a switch statement."
LLVM,ARC,183,"</s>

 MI -> getOperand ( OpNum ) . getImm ( ) = 1 ;"
LLVM,ARC,184,printEndMessage(O);
LLVM,ARC,185,"O = U6 shifted by OpNum, with instruction MI printed."
LLVM,ARC,186,"The next statement is: printOperand(MI, OpNum, O);"
LLVM,ARC,187,The next statement will likely check if false is equal to <STR_LIT>.
LLVM,ARC,188,"case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ; } }

The code will return an error or null value since the function does not have a default case."
LLVM,ARC,189,The variable Offset will be set equal to a constant numeric value.
LLVM,ARC,190,The next statement will be "case <STR_LIT> : return <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,ARC,191,"return <STR_LIT>

The next statement would be the end of the code snippet or a closing curly brace, depending on the context."
LLVM,ARC,192,"return <STR_LIT> ;

This code snippet is likely part of a switch statement, in which case the next statement would be the default case or a break statement. The next statement would depend on how the switch statement is being used and what the rest of the code looks like."
LLVM,ARC,193,"}

I am unable to predict the next statement as it depends on the purpose and functionality of the code. It could be a variable declaration, function definition, or any other instruction related to the MCInstPrinter class."
LLVM,ARC,194,"This code snippet appears to be defining an <ISA_LIT>InstPrinter class that takes in three different parameters (MAI, MII, and MRI) and passes them to the MCInstPrinter class. The next statement is likely to be defining a function or method within the <ISA_LIT>InstPrinter class, such as a printInstruction() method that utilizes the three parameters to print the instruction being passed in."
LLVM,ARC,195,Next statement: return;
LLVM,ARC,196,return <STR_LIT> "Bad condition code" ;
LLVM,ARC,197,return Op;
LLVM,ARC,198,"</s>

This statement asserts that the variable 'Op' is an immediate value and that it is equal to the string literal '<STR_LIT>'."
LLVM,ARC,199,OS << '+' ;
LLVM,ARC,200,"}

MCInst * MI , raw_ostream & O , StringRef Annot , const MCSubtargetInfo & STI ) { printAnnotation ( MI , O ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,201,"}

This code snippet defines a function called ""printInst"" that takes in four parameters: a pointer to an MCInst object called ""MI,"" a reference to a raw_ostream object called ""O,"" a StringRef object called ""Annot,"" and a reference to an MCSubtargetInfo object called ""STI."" Within the function, the ""printInstruction"" function is called with the ""MI"" and ""O"" parameters, followed by the ""printAnnotation"" function with the ""O"" and ""Annot"" parameters."
LLVM,ARC,202,"printImmValue(O, offset.getImm());"
LLVM,ARC,203,The next statement is "assert ( Op . isExpr ( ) && <STR_LIT> )"
LLVM,ARC,204,"printImm ( O , getAddI"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,ARC,206,An error will be thrown if the operator is not an immediate and the string literal is not found.
LLVM,ARC,207,"class <ISA_LIT>GenRegisterInfo RegInfo ; return OS << RegInfo . getAddressString ( RegNo ) ; }

returns 'OS << RegInfo.getAddressString(RegNo);Load'"
LLVM,ARC,208,"</s>


return;"
LLVM,ARC,209,"return false ; }
It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the current values of the variables and the context of the code."
LLVM,ARC,210,assert(MFI.getObjectOffset(FrameIndex) == 0);
LLVM,ARC,211,assert(RCI->needsStackRealignment() && "MachineFrameInfo::getObjectAlignment() should be called only for objects that will be loaded to registers with equal or higher alignment");
LLVM,ARC,212,"<STR_LIT>. setMemOperandOffset(MBB, I, MMO);"
LLVM,ARC,213,printReg and FrameIndex will be printed to the debug stream.
LLVM,ARC,214,MMO->getValue() = 0;
LLVM,ARC,215,"The next statement is: LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Spilling register "" << printReg(SrcReg, TRI) << ""to stack slot #"" << FrameIndex << ""\n"");"
LLVM,ARC,216,assert ( MMO->isStore() && "Expected a store machine memory operand");
LLVM,ARC,217,"""Adding a machine memory operand to the instruction."""
LLVM,ARC,218,"""The function checks that the source and destination registers are contained within the specified range, then calls BuildMI to add the source register and kill flag to the specified destination register in the given basic block at the given instruction iterator position."""
LLVM,ARC,219,"The code will return false if the operands at the specified positions are not a register and an immediate value, respectively."
LLVM,ARC,220,"The next statement could be checking if the machine instruction can perform a load or store operation, and if not, returning the boolean value of ""false""."
LLVM,ARC,221,"The next statement will return the length of the inline assembly string, based on the machine function and target information."
LLVM,ARC,222,The next statement will involve using the variable AsmStr to retrieve information from the getOperand function using a symbol name.
LLVM,ARC,223,"The next statement will be: ""BuildMI ( & MBB , dl , get ( Cond [ 1 ] . isImm ( ) ? BccOpc = <STR_LIT> : BccOpc = <STR_LIT> ) ) . addMBB ( TBB ) ;"""
LLVM,ARC,224,"}



return MID.isPostIncrement();"
LLVM,ARC,225,This code snippet is incomplete and cannot produce any further statements. It is missing the appropriate syntax and variable declarations.
LLVM,ARC,226,The next statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the value obtained from F shifted by TSF_AddrModeOff and masked with TSF_AddModeMask is equal to PreInc.
LLVM,ARC,227,The next statement is the opening bracket for the function body.
LLVM,ARC,228,"The next statement will likely define the constructor for a class called InstrInfo, passing in a variable called ST of type Subtarget and initializing variables with values of type GenInstInfo and RI."
LLVM,ARC,229,The next statement is likely to be "assert (DestReg == SrcReg)".
LLVM,ARC,230,"}

The code will continue to execute and build a machine instruction with the destination register and source register, setting the kill state of the source register depending on the boolean value of KillSrc."
LLVM,ARC,231,MIB->addCond(FBB);
LLVM,ARC,232,"else { return BuildMI ( MBB , MI , DL , get ( <STR_LIT> ) , Reg ) . addReg ( Value ) . getInstr ( ) ; }"
LLVM,ARC,233,Build the necessary machine memory operand for loading the value from the stack slot and store it in the variable MMO.
LLVM,ARC,234,The next statement will be a return statement that returns the boolean value "false" as the value of the function.
LLVM,ARC,235,"return LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs()) << <STR_LIT> << printReg(SrcReg, TRI) << <STR_LIT> << FrameIndex << <STR_LIT>) may print the values of SrcReg and FrameIndex."
LLVM,ARC,236,"LLVM_DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << <STR_LIT> << printReg ( DestReg , TRI ) << <STR_LIT> << FrameIndex + 1 << <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,237,"LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Adding store instruction: "" << printReg(SrcReg, TRI) << "" to frame index "" << FrameIndex << ""\n"");"
LLVM,ARC,238,I = I + 1;
LLVM,ARC,239,std::cout << "Creating InstrInfo object..." << std::endl;
LLVM,ARC,240,It is creating and initializing a new InstrInfo object with the given Subtarget and GenInstrInfo.
LLVM,ARC,241,"if ( ( InstToDelete . isPHI ( ) || InstToDelete . isDebugInstr ( ) ) ) break ; if ( ! CantAnalyze ) {
The next statement is ""CantAnalyze = !isPredicated(*I);""."
LLVM,ARC,242,"}</s>

""The function named anchor is returning nothing."""
LLVM,ARC,243,The next statement could possibly be a return statement or another function call.
LLVM,ARC,244,"This code snippet defines the constructor for the InstrInfo class, which inherits from the GenInstrInfo class and includes the RI class. This constructor initializes the GenInstrInfo object with two string literals and creates a new RI object."
LLVM,ARC,245,"The next statement will define the constructor function for the InstrInfo class, which inherits from the GenInstrInfo class and contains a call to the RI (RegisterInfo) function."
LLVM,ARC,246,assert ( <STR_LIT> .contains ( NextReg ) && <STR_LIT> );
LLVM,ARC,247,assert ( <STR_LIT> . contains ( Instruction ) && <STR_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,ARC,248,It is not possible to predict the next statement without knowing the input values and the control flow of the program.
LLVM,ARC,249,"It is difficult to predict the next statement without more context, as it depends on the execution path and variables used in the code. However, one possibility is that the next statement could be a conditional statement that checks if the value returned from getInlineAsmLength is not equal to 0, in which case the function would return the value from MI.getDesc().getSize(). Alternatively, if the previous statements triggered an error or exception, the next statement could be an exception handling statement."
LLVM,ARC,250,"return <STR_LIT>

Since the code snippet does not have a terminating statement, the next statement will likely be another <STR_LIT> case, followed by a return statement."
LLVM,ARC,251,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet is most likely to be an opening curly brace ""{""."
LLVM,ARC,252,"The next statement could be an if/else statement, a for/while loop, a variable declaration, or a function call. It will depend on the context of the code and the purpose of the returned value RI."
LLVM,ARC,253,"}

The next statement would likely be an if statement, which would check if FBB is not empty and then return a value."
LLVM,ARC,254,"if (Opc >= 0x100 && Opc <= 0x1FF ) {
     return true;
 }
 else {
     return false;
 }
}

This function checks if the given opcode is for a conditional branch instruction and returns a boolean value based on the result."
LLVM,ARC,255,"return Opc == Instruction::Unreachable || Opc == Instruction::Br || Opc == Instruction::BrIndirect || Opc == Instruction::Switch || Opc == Instruction::IndirectBr || Opc == Instruction::Invoke || Opc == Instruction::Resume || Opc == Instruction::CatchSwitch || Opc == Instruction::CatchRet || Opc == Instruction::CleanupRet || Opc == Instruction::CatchPad || Opc == Instruction::CatchEnd; 

The next statement will be the closing curly brace for the function, ending the function definition."
LLVM,ARC,256,"</s>
False"
LLVM,ARC,257,"return Opcode == 8 || Opcode == 9; }

This code snippet defines the function ""isLoad"" which checks whether the given Opcode is equal to 8 or 9."
LLVM,ARC,258,"</ISA_LIT>

if (Opcode == <ISA_LIT>LOAD_FROM_STACK</ISA_LIT>) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}"
LLVM,ARC,259,TRUE
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,ARC,260,FALSE
LLVM,ARC,261,"str</STR_LIT>
The next statement will return a boolean value, indicating whether or not the Opc variable is equal to the string literal ""str""."
LLVM,ARC,262,"</s>


The next statement would likely be checking if the machine operand Op is an immediate value and comparing it to a numeric literal."
LLVM,ARC,263,"</s>

The code snipped will evaluate if the operator is an immediate value and if that value is equal to a certain number literal."
LLVM,ARC,264,The next statement will be "}" indicating the end of the function.
LLVM,ARC,265,"</s>

`MI->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateImm(Value), Reg, 0);`"
LLVM,ARC,266,"assert(MMO && ""Machine memory operand is valid."");
assert(TRI->getSpillSize(*RC) == 0 && ""Spill size is equal to 0."");"
LLVM,ARC,267,"return Cond [ <NUM_LIT> ] != <NUM_LIT> ; 


 ""/closing bracket that ends assert function"""
LLVM,ARC,268,assert(MBB.contains(MachineInstr::getOpcode()));
LLVM,ARC,269,"</s>


<s>return SelectionDAGISel(TM, OptLevel);</s>"
LLVM,ARC,270,"return: 

return: function body starts here"
LLVM,ARC,271,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet will be ""return new <ISA_LIT>RegisterCoalescer (OptLevel);""."
LLVM,ARC,272,"return new <ISA_LIT>LegalizeDAG ( TM , OptLevel ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,273,end of code snippet
LLVM,ARC,274,- The code snippet ends.
LLVM,ARC,275,<s> if ( Addr . getOpcode ( ) == <STR_LIT> ) Base = Addr . getOperand ( <NUM_LIT> + 1 ) ;
LLVM,ARC,276,"}

The next statement would likely be a conditional statement checking for a different opcode."
LLVM,ARC,277,"the address's opcode is equal to <STR_LIT>, then execute the following code block."
LLVM,ARC,278,"/* The next statement will be a statement ending the method or function, possibly including a return value. */"
LLVM,ARC,279,"Base = CurDAG -> getTargetConstant (<NUM_LIT>, SDLoc ( Addr ) , ENDIAN_SWAP ( TelPred = NE > 

The code snippet will continue to evaluate the condition in the ""if"" statement, specifically checking if the current address's opcode matches a specific constant and if it is a base with a constant offset. If the condition is met, the snippet will then check if the opcode matches another specific constant and set the Base and Offset variables accordingly."
LLVM,ARC,280,"</s>

The next statement could potentially be a conditional statement checking if the opcode of Base is equal to another <STR_LIT> and then performing some action based on that comparison."
LLVM,ARC,281,"Next statement:
CurDAG->SelectNode(Opcode, VT, OpList, SDLoc(N));"
LLVM,ARC,282,"<s> Tmp = CurDAG -> getNode ( Opcode , SDLoc ( N ) , SDValue ( Pred , 0 ) , SDValue ( Reg , 0 ) ) ; SDValue Ops [ <NUM_LIT> ] = { } ; Ops [ <NUM_LIT> ] = SDValue ( Tmp , <NUM_LIT> ) ; SDNode *Out = CurDAG -> getNode ( Opcode , SDLoc ( N ) , MVT : : Other , Ops ) ; Result . setNode ( Out ) ; return true ;"
LLVM,ARC,283,"Base = CurDAG -> getLoad(<STR_LIT>, SDLoc(Addr), Addr.getValueType(), CurDAG->
buildFrameIndex(Base->getValueType( ), FIN->getIndex( ), <STR_LIT>),<STR_LIT> );"
LLVM,ARC,284,<br>The code checks if the address is valid and returns `true` if it is.
LLVM,ARC,285,"RegInfo . addLiveIn ( ArgRegs [ i ] , VReg ) ; SDValue Val ; if ( i == FirstVAReg ) {
<STR_LIT> SDValue VReg = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, dl, VReg, RegVT);

ArgIn = DAG.getLoad(VA.getLocVT(), dl, Chain, FIN, MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(MF, FI));"
LLVM,ARC,286,"DAG . add ( CarryOutput , <NUM_LIT> <STR_LIT> <STR_LIT> getCopyToReg ( DAG . getEntryNode ( ) , dl , FrameReg , <REG_NUM_VAL> ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,287,The code will return a copy of the frame register from the machine function.
LLVM,ARC,288,"If the conditional for ""if (IsVarArg)"" is not met, the code will never reach this section."
LLVM,ARC,289,"return LowerGlobalTLSAddress ( Op , DAG ) ;



case <STR_LIT> : return LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,290,"The next statement will be ""SDValue V = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, SDLoc(N), DAG.getVTList(<STR_LIT>, <STR_LIT>), N->getOperand(<NUM_LIT>)) ;"""
LLVM,ARC,291,"setOperationAction( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Legal ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,292,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Expand ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,293,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Legal ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,294,"setOperationAction ( <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> , Legal ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,295,"bool CanLowerCall ( CallingConv :: ID CallConv , MachineFunction & MF , bool IsVarArg , const SmallVectorImpl < <STR_LIT> > & Outs, LLVMContext & Context ) const"
LLVM,ARC,296,The next statement would return a nullptr.
LLVM,ARC,297,"return <STR_LIT> ;

There is no code left, so there is nothing left to predict. It appears that the code returns a string literal in each case."
LLVM,ARC,298,"The next statement could be another case with a string literal and a return statement, or the default case with an unreachable statement in the LLVM library."
LLVM,ARC,299,return false;
LLVM,ARC,300,The code will return a node from the DAG with the given parameters.
LLVM,ARC,301,"Chain = DAG.getNode(<STR_LIT>, dl, NodeTys, Ops);"
LLVM,ARC,302,default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown calling convention");
LLVM,ARC,303,"The next statement would be: 

DAG.getCopyFromReg(DAG.getRoot(), dl, FrameReg, VT)"
LLVM,ARC,304,"</s>

MFI.setFrameAddressIsTaken(true);"
LLVM,ARC,305,The code will return the GlobalValue node with the offset and target global address added to it.
LLVM,ARC,306,"SDNode *Node = DAG.getNode(ISD::GlobalAddress, dl, MVT::i64, GA) ;"
LLVM,ARC,307,It looks like the code is retrieving a JumpTable node and using it to get a target jump table from the DAG. The next statement will probably use the target jump table to create a new node and return it.
LLVM,ARC,308,"return LowerConstantPool ( Op , DAG ) ;

case <STR_LIT> : return LowerLOAD ( Op , DAG ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Dag.getFrameIndex(FI, <STR_LIT>)."
LLVM,ARC,310,"The if statement checks if MemOpChains is empty, and if it is not, it assigns the result of the DAG.getNode operation to the variable Chain."
LLVM,ARC,311,rhs = Op.getOperand(<NUM_LIT>);
LLVM,ARC,312,"The next statement would most likely be a return statement, possibly returning an SDValue object with the values LS and SR as its arguments."
LLVM,ARC,313,"The next statement would likely be a return statement, with some form of empty value or variable as the returned value."
LLVM,ARC,314,"This code snippet creates a new SDLoc object and uses it to get a pointer type from a target lowering information object. It then uses this pointer type to create a new SDValue by passing in a frame index from a FuncInfo object. The next statement may involve using this SDValue in some way, such as passing it as an argument to a function or assigning it to a variable."
LLVM,ARC,315,return false;
LLVM,ARC,316,"}

There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement. The statement may depend on the context of the code snippet and could be anything from a comment or single line of code to multiple lines of code."
LLVM,ARC,317,"</s>

The next statement would likely contain a return statement with an empty SDValue."
LLVM,ARC,318,"The next statement could be a return statement or an if statement, depending on the logic within the PerformDAGCombine function."
LLVM,ARC,319,MF . setAlignment ( <NUM_LIT> ) ;
LLVM,ARC,320,"This code snippet initializes the variables ReturnStackOffsetSet, VarArgsFrameIndex, ReturnStackOffset, and MaxCallStackReq with corresponding values."
LLVM,ARC,321,"</s>

The next statement may be an opening curly brace ({) to indicate the start of the function's body."
LLVM,ARC,322,"</s>

<s> Throw an exception due to an invalid alignment value."
LLVM,ARC,323,<
LLVM,ARC,324,"</s>

The code snippet will end with a closing curly brace."
LLVM,ARC,325,functionInfo.calculateCallStackReq();
LLVM,ARC,326,"}</s>

Since this code does not include any conditional statements or loops, the next statement will likely be the end of the function, denoted by a closing curly brace."
LLVM,ARC,327,The next statement would likely be the closing bracket for the function.
LLVM,ARC,328,"It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without knowing the existing code and the context in which this statement is written. However, based on the naming convention, it is likely that the next statement could involve using the value of ReturnStackOffset for some operation or condition."
LLVM,ARC,329,This code snippet defines the function "FunctionInfo" and its parameters.
LLVM,ARC,330,I am unable to predict the next statement as there is not enough information provided about the code snippet and its context.
LLVM,ARC,331,"</s>

}"
LLVM,ARC,332,"throw(std::runtime_error(""An attempt has been made to open the output stream more than once."")) }</s>

The code will throw an error stating that the output stream has been attempted to be opened more than once."
LLVM,ARC,333,"The next statement could be:

AssemblerDirective = <STR_LIT> ;"
LLVM,ARC,334,Debug = true
LLVM,ARC,335,"<

}"
LLVM,ARC,336,"""The constructor function for MCInstLower is being defined, which takes in a pointer to an MCContext object and a reference to an AsmPrinter object. The constructor initializes the Ctx variable to the passed in MCContext pointer and the Printer variable to the AsmPrinter reference."""
LLVM,ARC,337,The next statement is: "}"
LLVM,ARC,338,"// Get opcode
OutMI.setOpcode(MI->getOpcode());

// Get operands
const MachineOperand *MOs = MI->explicit_operands();

// Add operands to MCInst
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
  // Add operand to MCInst
  MCOperand MCOp;

  if (MOs[i].isReg()) {
    unsigned Reg = MOs[i].getReg();

    if (Reg == Machine::NoRegister)
      MCOp = MCOperand::createImm(0);
    else
      MC"
LLVM,ARC,339,<s> OutMI . addOperand ( MI -> getOperand ( 0 ) ) ;
LLVM,ARC,340,"'
Return LowerSymbolOperand(MO, MOTy, Offset)."
LLVM,ARC,341,"}

case MachineOperand :: MO_Indirect :
return MCOperand :: createIndirect ( MO . getImm ( ) ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,342,The statement would likely be a statement asserting the existence of the symbol being assigned in the switch statement before.
LLVM,ARC,343,It is likely that the code will return the value of the variable "MAI".
LLVM,ARC,344,"The next statement could potentially register the target with the MC Code Gen Framework, such as TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodegenInfo(The<ISA_LIT>Target, create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeGenInfo)."
LLVM,ARC,345,throw std::runtime_error("Unable to initialize MCRegisterInfo.");
LLVM,ARC,346,MAI->setRelaxELFRelocations(true);
LLVM,ARC,347,"</s>

{

return;
}"
LLVM,ARC,348,"The next statement will likely define the constructor for the TargetStreamer class, specifying that it is a subclass of MCTargetStreamer and passing in a reference to the MCStreamer class. It may also include the opening curly brace for the constructor's body."
LLVM,ARC,349,return MAI->getPointerSize();
LLVM,ARC,350,MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);
LLVM,ARC,351,"}


The next statement will return a new instance of the ISA-specific instruction printer class, passing in the MCAsmInfo, MCInstrInfo, and MCRegisterInfo objects as parameters."
LLVM,ARC,352,"return new ISA_LITMCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI);"
LLVM,ARC,353,"</s>

None."
LLVM,ARC,354,It will allocate memory and initialize a new MCRegisterInfo object using the keyword "new".
LLVM,ARC,355,"}</s>

The next statement will likely involve returning a value from the function call create<ISA_LIT>MCSubtargetInfoImpl, using the provided parameters."
LLVM,ARC,356,"</s>

""MCInstPrinter * InstPrint is set to ""true"" for verbose assembly printing"""
LLVM,ARC,357,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCAsmBackend (The<ISA_LIT>Target, create<ISA_LIT>MCAsmBackend);"
LLVM,ARC,358,"TargetRegistry :: RegisterMCCodeEmitter ( The<ISA_LIT>Target , create<ISA_LIT>MCCodeEmitter ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,359,"This code snippet sets the source operand of the Ldst instruction, removes an operand, and then sets the description of Ldst. It then adds two operands, one being a newly created register and the other being a register with a specified value, before adding a third operand that is the base register. It then checks if this is a store operation and adds a fourth operand if it is. The next statement could potentially be a return statement or a call to a function using the updated Ldst instruction."
LLVM,ARC,360,"Ldst.setDesc(AST->getInstrInfo()->get(NewOpcode));
Ldst.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(NewBase, true));
if (IsStore)
  Ldst.addOperand(Src);
Ldst.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(BaseReg, false));
Ldst.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(BaseReg, false));"
LLVM,ARC,361,"Next, the code will check if MoveTo is equal to the MachineInstr pointed to by the variable ""Add""."
LLVM,ARC,362,"dbgs ( ) << <STR_LIT> << First;

""Machine instruction pointer Last = &, if (MDT->dominates (Last,First)) std::swap (First, Last); dbgs() << ""First"" << First"""
LLVM,ARC,363,Result = nullptr;
LLVM,ARC,364,"if (UsesAfterLdst.size() > UsesAfterAdd.size()) {
    Result = Add;
} else {
    Result = Ldst;
}"
LLVM,ARC,365,Ldst.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateImm(0));
LLVM,ARC,366,The code will return false if the instruction (*MI) does not dominate the machine basic block (MBB) and continue to the next statement.
LLVM,ARC,367,The next statement will specify the return type of the function and use the `MDT` and `MRI` variables to check if the instruction `Ldst` is dependent on the register `R`.
LLVM,ARC,368,"if (OUTPUT_AFTER())
  MF.viewCFG();"
LLVM,ARC,369,The next statement will check if there are any changes to the basic blocks in the current function and update the "Changed" variable accordingly.
LLVM,ARC,370,"Predict:
dbgs() <<""Fixing memory operand with a register base and a constant offset."" << *First <<"" by a single memory operation from "" << *First << "" to "" << *Last << "" by changing the offset operand from "" << *Uses << "" to "" << *Uses << ""\n"";"
LLVM,ARC,371,The next statement is: "MachineInstr * Result = Ldst . getNextNode ( ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,372,"The code snippet will attempt to check if the value stored in ValReg is being read by any other instruction in the loop. If it is being read, the code will return false."
LLVM,ARC,373,return false;
LLVM,ARC,374,"// Initialize variables and allocate memory

next statement:
// Analyze the functions and determine optimal addressing mode"
LLVM,ARC,375,">

return false;"
LLVM,ARC,376,"The code is checking if the given operation is an add constant operation. If it is, it then checks if the new offset is a valid increment offset. If so, it continues to the next statement. If not, it will return false. If the given operation is not an add constant operation, it then checks if it is a load/store operation that can handle a displacement equal to the negative of the new offset. If so, it continues to the next statement. If not, it will print a debug statement using the given STR_LIT and negative new offset values, and then return false."
LLVM,ARC,377,"The code will enter the first for loop and iterate through the instructions until it reaches the end of the block or encounters a debug value instruction. Within the loop, it will check if the current instruction is a store, call, inline assembly, or has unmodeled side effects. If any of these conditions are met, the code will return false. If the variable IsStore is true and the current instruction may load, the code will also return false. After the first loop finishes, the code will then enter a second for loop that iterates through the explicit operands of the instruction Ldst. If an operand is not a register or"
LLVM,ARC,378,"}

nullptr"
LLVM,ARC,379,"}
SmallVector < MachineInstr * , 2 > UsesBeforeLdst ;"
LLVM,ARC,380,"}

The next statement could be evaluating another condition or performing a function based on the result of the previous conditions. Possible statements include checking if the MI is a debug value, evaluating if it is a call, inline assembly, or has unmodeled side effects, before potentially returning false."
LLVM,ARC,381,The code snippet sets the description of the MachineInstr object and adds a new MachineOperand with the given NewBase and a boolean value of true.
LLVM,ARC,382,Compile the modified instruction with the new opcode and updated operands.
LLVM,ARC,383,"}</s>

This code snippet creates a new instance of the <ISA_LIT>OptAddrMode class and returns it as a new FunctionPass object."
LLVM,ARC,384,> The "if" statement will check if the "MachineDomTree" object dominates the values of "InstBB" and "MBB".
LLVM,ARC,385,MO.addImm(NewOffset);
LLVM,ARC,386,MO.setImm(NewOffset);
LLVM,ARC,387,"Void


Throw an error: ""Void is not a recognized statement."""
LLVM,ARC,388,"MachineFunctionPass::run(MF) {
	// code
}"
LLVM,ARC,389,"}

It is likely that the next statement would be a closing curly bracket to end the function."
LLVM,ARC,390,break;
LLVM,ARC,391,"if ( Offset >= 0 )
{
  return true;
}
else
{
  return false;
}"
LLVM,ARC,392,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet without having access to the rest of the code and its context. The statement could potentially be anything that follows the pattern of the programming language being used.
LLVM,ARC,393,"""End of code snippet."""
LLVM,ARC,394,"</s>

<s> { return true; } </s>"
LLVM,ARC,395,return false;
LLVM,ARC,396,"return noUseOfAddBeforeLoadOrStore (Add, Ldst);"
LLVM,ARC,397,"if ( Changed )
The next statement could potentially be an ""else"" statement or a closing bracket."
LLVM,ARC,398,"The next statement would be to check if the variable ""Res"" has a valid MachineInstr, and if so, set the variable ""Changed"" to true and reassign ""MI"" to the iterator of ""Res"" minus one."
LLVM,ARC,399,<ISA_LIT>AddrMode = MF.<ISA_LIT>getAddrMode();
LLVM,ARC,400,return Changed;
LLVM,ARC,401,It will return the result of the function call "needsFrameMoves()".
LLVM,ARC,402,"Offset += MF . getFrameInfo ( ) . getObjectOffset ( FrameIndex ) ; return ; } }

The next statement of this code snippet is ""Offset += MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + <NUM_LIT>).getImm();"""
LLVM,ARC,403,"The next statement will be: BuildMI ( MBB , II , dl , TII . get ( MI . getOpcode ( ) ) ) . addReg ( Reg , RegState :: Define ) . addReg ( FrameReg ) . addImm ( Offset ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,404,"The next statement can vary, as the code does not include a clear conditional statement or loop. However, potential next statements could include:

- A call to a function using the variables and functions declared in the code snippet
- A conditional statement using the variables and functions declared in the code snippet, such as an if statement to check the value of Offset or Reg
- An assignment statement using the variables and functions declared in the code snippet
- A return statement to end the current function or block of code."
LLVM,ARC,405,the function to get frame register will be called given the constant machine function "MF"
LLVM,ARC,406,"= ""<eof>


No predictions can be made as the code snippet is not complete."
LLVM,ARC,407,"assert <STR_LIT> << <STR_LIT> ; }


break;"
LLVM,ARC,408,The RegisterInfo class inherits from the GenRegisterInfo class and takes in the ST variable as a parameter.
LLVM,ARC,409,The next statement would be "}" which indicates the end of the constructor function for the RegisterInfo class.
LLVM,ARC,410,"</s>

The code will continue to function normally and call the ""replaceFrameIndex"" function."
LLVM,ARC,411,"llvm_unreachable ( ) ;

BuildMI ( MBB , II , DL , TII . get ( isUInt < <NUM_LIT> > ( Offset ) ? <STR_LIT> : <STR_LIT> ) ) . addReg ( Reg , RegState :: Define ) . addReg ( FrameReg ) . addImm ( Offset ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,412,"BuildMI ( MBB , II , dl , TII . get ( ADJCALLSTACKDOWNINST ) , Reg ) . addImm ( FixupImm ) . addMemOperand ( * MI . memoperands_begin ( ) ) ;</s>

The code will check the next case of the switch statement, which is <STR_LIT>. It will then assert that Offset is divisible by <NUM_LIT> and then build a machine instruction (BuildMI) using the ADJCALLSTACKDOWNINST opcode, adding the value of FixupImm to the register Reg."
LLVM,ARC,413,"The next statement would likely be a function or method declaration for the RegisterInfo class, as it is being passed a string literal as a parameter."
LLVM,ARC,414,"</s>

{...}

The next statement would be the end of the function or class declaration."
LLVM,ARC,415,The next statement to be predicted is an assert statement that checks whether "Offset < 0 && -Offset <= StackSize" and "Offset >= -64 && Offset < StackSize" are true.
LLVM,ARC,416,"</ISA_LIT>

// Returns an array of callee-saved physical registers for the given MachineFunction."
LLVM,ARC,417,"*
return &MF->getTarget().getFrameLowering()->getCalleeSavedRegs(*MF);"
LLVM,ARC,418,"}

return ...

CSR_<ISA_LIT>_RegMask;"
LLVM,ARC,419,"}</s>

It will return the CSR_<ISA_LIT>_RegMask value for the given MachineFunction and CallingConv::ID."
LLVM,ARC,420,return TFI->hasFP(MF);
LLVM,ARC,421,The next statement would be "Reserved.set(<STR_LIT>);".
LLVM,ARC,422,"There is not enough information to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could potentially be a continuation of this conditional statement, or it could be another line of code entirely."
LLVM,ARC,423,"return <STR_LIT> 
The next statement will likely be a default case of the switch statement, which will return a <STR_LIT> value."
LLVM,ARC,424,"}

<s> The function requiresRegisterScavenging in the RegisterInfo class accepts a const reference to the MachineFunction, and will always return true."
LLVM,ARC,425,"</s>

The next statement is likely to be ""}"" closing the function."
LLVM,ARC,426,"</s>

The next statement could be a closing curly brace to end the function or an ""if"" statement to check a condition."
LLVM,ARC,427,"}</s>


There is not enough information to predict the next statement."
LLVM,ARC,428,The next statement will likely be a declaration or assignment of a variable.
LLVM,ARC,429,"</ISA_LIT>

""Initialize the TargetLowering information for the given TargetMachine and current subtarget."""
LLVM,ARC,430,"</s>

The next statement of this code snippet is likely a function or method call using the variables and objects initialized in the previous line, followed by closing curly braces."
LLVM,ARC,431,"This code snippet initializes the Subtarget class with the given parameters and calls the constructors for the GenSubtargetInfo, FrameLowering, and TLInfo classes. It also passes two instances of the current CPU string to the GenSubtargetInfo constructor."
LLVM,ARC,432,"</s>

return;"
LLVM,ARC,433,"</s>

The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace indicating the end of the function."
LLVM,ARC,434,The next statement is likely to be a member initialization of a data member called "InstrInfo" or a comment explaining the purpose of the current code snippet.
LLVM,ARC,435,<ISA_LIT>Inheritance from parent classes will be initialized and their respective constructors will be called.
LLVM,ARC,436,return FrameLowering;
LLVM,ARC,437,"if ( VR.WidgetBar ) { return VR.WidgetBar->InstrInfo.get ( ); } else { return <PERSON_VAR>->WidgetBar ; } }

<PERSON_VAR>-> WidgetBar->passing it to the function will be the next statement."
LLVM,ARC,438,"}</s>

The function will return a pointer to the RegisterInfo from the InstrInfo."
LLVM,ARC,439,"}

Nothing will execute next"
LLVM,ARC,440,"</s>

return targetLowering;"
LLVM,ARC,441,I cannot make a prediction without knowing what is contained in the TLInfo variable.
LLVM,ARC,442,"}</s>

It is a function being used to check if Xnorm is true or false."
LLVM,ARC,443,"<s> RegisterTarget < Triple :: abc > Y ( getThe<ISA_LIT>Target ( ) , <STR_LIT> , <STR_LIT> ) ;"
LLVM,ARC,444,"}

The next statement will likely involve returning the ""The<ISA_LIT>Target"" variable."
LLVM,ARC,445,It is not possible to predict the next statement as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough context to determine the expected outcome.
LLVM,ARC,446,"The next statement would likely involve either initializing or defining a variable, or calling a function within the addPreRegAlloc() method."
LLVM,ARC,447,"<TAB>}

The next statement is to declare ""TLOF"" followed by a function call using ""make_unique"" to initialize TargetLoweringObjectFileELF."
LLVM,ARC,448,"TLOF = TargetLoweringObjectFileELF() ;
Subtarget.initSelectionDAG(TargetLowering(), CodeGenOpt::Aggressive);"
LLVM,ARC,449,The next statement will return an optional CodeModel::Model object named "effectiveCodeModel".
LLVM,ARC,450,"If the statement is true, return the value of CM."
LLVM,ARC,451,"if ( MArch) {

""Proceed into if statement condition using 'if (MArch){' tag."""
LLVM,ARC,452,"The predicted statement is: 
return TargetTransformInfo( <ISA_LIT>TTIImpl(this, F) );"
LLVM,ARC,453,return true;
LLVM,ARC,454,"The next statement would be: 
// function body starts here"
LLVM,ARC,455,"Unable to predict


Without more context, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet. It could be any number of statements depending on the purpose and structure of the addPreEmitPass function."
LLVM,ARC,456,TargetPassConfig::initialize();
LLVM,ARC,457,This code snippet defines a PassConfig class that takes in a TargetMachine and PassManagerBase as parameters and inherits from the TargetPassConfig class.
LLVM,ARC,458,"}

 Subtarget ( TT , CPU , FS , * this ), CodeGenOpt :: Level OL )
TLOF(std::make_unique<TargetLoweringObjectFileELF>()"
LLVM,ARC,459,It is not possible to accurately predict the next statement without any context or knowledge of the code snippet. The next statement could be anything depending on the programmer's intentions and the purpose of the code snippet.
LLVM,ARC,460,"PASS_DEVICE_ANALYSIS }



PASS_SCHEDULER_INIT"
LLVM,ARC,461,"The next statement will return the value of the objFileLowering variable, which is a const override function."
LLVM,ARC,462,"}

return * RM;"
LLVM,ARC,463,"}
The next statement will likely be a closing curly brace to end the function."
LLVM,ARC,464,"</s>

return new <ISA_LIT>SubtargetImpl()"
LLVM,ARC,465,"</s>
It is likely that the code will continue to initialize and return the ""TargetTransformInfo"" class using the ""TTIImpl"" class and the current object and function (represented by ""this"" and ""F"" respectively)."
LLVM,ARC,466,The next statement would be "getThe<ISA_LIT>Target();"
LLVM,ARC,467,"}
The LLVMInitialize<ISA_LIT>Target function will register the <ISA_LIT>TargetMachine as the target machine."
LLVM,ARC,468,"</s>

""Closing bracket (}) indicating the end of the constructor."""
LLVM,ARC,469,return instance of TTIImpl
LLVM,ARC,470,"</s>

The function or method will end and return the value stored in the variable ""ST""."
LLVM,ARC,471,"</s>

<h5>There is no next statement as this is the last statement being executed.</h5>"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
GCC,riscv,1009,"/* The link/next pair always exists at BASE_REG. */ rtx bases[2]; bases[0] = XVECEXP (operands[0], 0, 0); bases[1] = XVECEXP (operands[0], 0, 1); if (load_p) { rtx tmp; unsigned int i; /* Load BASE_REG to avoid extra dependencies. */ FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (mode, operands[1], i, tmp) if (tmp == BASE_REG) break; gcc_assert (REG_P (tmp)); operands[1] = gen_rtx_REG ("
LLVM,NVPTX,646,"The next statement could be an if statement or a call to another function, such as ""if (MF.hasPseudoInstr()) {"" or ""replaceCallFramePseudoInstr(MF, MBB, I);"""
LLVM,RISCV,2836,"Set the value of Src to the result of converting the value of Mask to a scalable vector with type VecVT, using the getContainerForFixedLengthVector function."
LLVM,ARC,205,"</s>

Closing curly brace }</s>"
Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Code
LLVM,NVPTX,1504,return Flt.convertToFloat();