Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The Wiki dataset consists of 14,290 articles spanning 15 high-level and 45 mid-l
|
|
35 |
|
36 |
Please cite us if you find the data and the papers useful, and do not hesitate to create an issue or email us if you have problems!
|
37 |
|
38 |
-
If you find LLM-based topic generation has hallucination or instability:
|
39 |
```
|
40 |
@misc{li2025largelanguagemodelsstruggle,
|
41 |
title={Large Language Models Struggle to Describe the Haystack without Human Help: Human-in-the-loop Evaluation of LLMs},
|
@@ -49,21 +49,6 @@ If you find LLM-based topic generation has hallucination or instability:
|
|
49 |
```
|
50 |
|
51 |
If you use the human annotations or preprocessing:
|
52 |
-
```
|
53 |
-
@inproceedings{hoyle-etal-2021-automated,
|
54 |
-
title = "Is Automated Topic Evaluation Broken? The Incoherence of Coherence",
|
55 |
-
author = "Hoyle, Alexander Miserlis and
|
56 |
-
Goel, Pranav and
|
57 |
-
Hian-Cheong, Andrew and
|
58 |
-
Peskov, Denis and
|
59 |
-
Boyd-Graber, Jordan and
|
60 |
-
Resnik, Philip",
|
61 |
-
booktitle = "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems",
|
62 |
-
year = "2021",
|
63 |
-
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02173",
|
64 |
-
}
|
65 |
-
```
|
66 |
-
|
67 |
```
|
68 |
@inproceedings{li-etal-2024-improving,
|
69 |
title = "Improving the {TENOR} of Labeling: Re-evaluating Topic Models for Content Analysis",
|
@@ -87,6 +72,23 @@ If you use the human annotations or preprocessing:
|
|
87 |
}
|
88 |
```
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
If you evaluate ground-truth evaluations or stability:
|
91 |
```
|
92 |
@inproceedings{hoyle-etal-2022-neural,
|
|
|
35 |
|
36 |
Please cite us if you find the data and the papers useful, and do not hesitate to create an issue or email us if you have problems!
|
37 |
|
38 |
+
If you find LLM-based topic generation has hallucination or instability, and coherence not applicable to LLM-based topic models:
|
39 |
```
|
40 |
@misc{li2025largelanguagemodelsstruggle,
|
41 |
title={Large Language Models Struggle to Describe the Haystack without Human Help: Human-in-the-loop Evaluation of LLMs},
|
|
|
49 |
```
|
50 |
|
51 |
If you use the human annotations or preprocessing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
```
|
53 |
@inproceedings{li-etal-2024-improving,
|
54 |
title = "Improving the {TENOR} of Labeling: Re-evaluating Topic Models for Content Analysis",
|
|
|
72 |
}
|
73 |
```
|
74 |
|
75 |
+
If you want to use the claim coherence does not generalize to neural topic models:
|
76 |
+
```
|
77 |
+
@inproceedings{hoyle-etal-2021-automated,
|
78 |
+
title = "Is Automated Topic Evaluation Broken? The Incoherence of Coherence",
|
79 |
+
author = "Hoyle, Alexander Miserlis and
|
80 |
+
Goel, Pranav and
|
81 |
+
Hian-Cheong, Andrew and
|
82 |
+
Peskov, Denis and
|
83 |
+
Boyd-Graber, Jordan and
|
84 |
+
Resnik, Philip",
|
85 |
+
booktitle = "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems",
|
86 |
+
year = "2021",
|
87 |
+
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02173",
|
88 |
+
}
|
89 |
+
```
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
If you evaluate ground-truth evaluations or stability:
|
93 |
```
|
94 |
@inproceedings{hoyle-etal-2022-neural,
|