RESULTS	The total effective rate in the treated group was 87.2 % ( 41/47 ) , and in the control group was 61.7 % ( 21/47 ) , showing significant difference between groups ( P < 0.01 ) ; significant improvement of UPro , URBC , beta2-M , NAG , BUN , SCr and SUA were shown in the treated group ( P < 0.05 , P < 0.01 ) ; but in the control group , only URBC count was significantly decreased ( P < 0.05 ) , no statistically significant change of other indexes was found ( P > 0.05 ) .\