RESULTS	In the post hoc analysis , the improvement in the line bisection test score in the high-frequency rTMS group was statistically significant compared with that in the sham stimulation group ( high vs sham P = .03 , low vs sham P = .09 , high vs low P = .58 ) , and the improvements in the K-MBI scores of the 2 rTMS groups were statistically significant compared with those in the sham stimulation group ( high vs sham P < .01 , low vs sham P = .02 , high vs low P = .75 ) .\