RESULTS	The secondary outcomes GRS ( 10.312.28 vs. 9.172.21 ; p = 0.001 ) , PT ( 214.6057.97 s vs. 246.9859.34 s ; p < 0.0001 ) , and CON ( 3.140.89 vs. 2.850.90 ; p = 0.04 ) were also significantly different between groups , favoring group 2 .\