text: Yo, check it out, let me break it down
  Plasmodium vivax, it hit the Republic of Korea town
  Back in '93, it made its return
  And it's still a concern, affecting public health, you learn
  
  This study aimed to measure, using IFAT
  Them anti-P. vivax antibodies, where they at?
  In the border areas of ROK, we went
  To determine the seroprevalence, that's the intent
  
  Blood samples collected, in Gimpo-si, Paju-si
  Yeoncheon-gun and Cheorwon-gun, that's where they be
  KCDC kept 'em safe and sound
  We tested 1,774, let the numbers astound
  
  The overall seropositivity, it was low
  Just 0.94%, you know
  Paju-si had the highest rate in the mix
  1.9% showin' positive hits
  
  Gimpo-si followed with 1.4% in sight
  Yeoncheon-gun had 0.67%, keepin' it tight
  Cheorwon-gun came with 0.19%, just a few
  But the numbers don't lie, they're tellin' the truth
  
  From 2003 to 2005, the parasite incidence
  It gradually decreased, that's the persistence
  1.69, 1.09, and 0.80, that's the API
  Year by year, it went down, oh my!
  
  Yeoncheon-gun had the highest API rate
  Followed by Cheorwon-gun, Paju-si, and Gimpo-si, mate
  The ranking stayed the same over the years
  Malaria transmission, it didn't shift gears
  
  Gimpo-si's seropositivity, it showed a strong link
  With the API of 2005, that's the sync
  A linear relationship, you can't deny
  Predicting the future, that's why we try
  
  Using IFAT data, we gain insights
  Understanding malaria's prevalence, day and night
  Predicting future transmission, it's key
  Establishing control programs, that's our guarantee