text: Yo, check it out, I got a study to share,
  About endometrial adenocarcinoma, so rare.
  We looked at the silver-stained nucleolar organizers,
  Counting AgNORs, we were the analyzers.
  
  We studied 63 cases, human subjects,
  Checked the relationship, no neglects.
  Between AgNORs and DNA content, we compared,
  In interphase neoplastic cells, we really dared.
  
  Using image cytometry, we measured the mean,
  AgNOR area per nucleus, it was so keen.
  Silver-stained samples from paraffin-embedded sections,
  Determining AgNOR content, no objections.
  
  DNA content was evaluated by cytofluorometry,
  On single cells, we checked it, no monotony.
  Same specimen, expressed as DNA ploidy,
  Measured in c units, no need for tautology.
  
  The mean AgNOR area ranged, from small to large,
  1.26 to 4.48 microns squared, that's the charge.
  Modal DNA ploidy, it had its own range,
  From 1.90 to 4.00c, nothin' strange.
  
  But hold up, no significant associations found,
  Between AgNOR area and DNA ploidy, profound.
  We checked with linear regression, nothin' to tell,
  Beta = 0.18, P = 0.15, oh well.
  
  Even dichotomized variables, we gave 'em a shot,
  Chi-square analysis, still nothin' hot.
  Chi-square = 0.82, P = 0.37, no relation,
  Between mean AgNOR area and ploidy, no correlation.
  
  But wait, let's focus on a subset, 45 cases,
  Stage I adenocarcinomas, different places.
  We checked the prognostic relevance, no joke,
  AgNOR content and DNA ploidy, we spoke.
  
  In the univariate analysis, they both mattered,
  Significantly related to patient survival, it shattered.
  But when we entered 'em in regression analysis, true,
  With myometrial invasion and grading, they flew.
  
  They showed independent, high prognostic value,
  Mean AgNOR area and modal DNA ploidy, true and true.
  So there you have it, the study's conclusion,
  AgNORs and DNA content, there's some fusion.