text: Yo, check it out, I got a study to spit,
  Comparing the techniques, let me break it down a bit.
  Enzyme immunofiltration and DNA hybridization,
  In human cytomegalovirus, that's the fascination.
  
  Infected MRC-5 cells, that's the game we play,
  Enzyme immunofiltration, let me show you the way.
  Glass fiber filters in microplates, that's how we roll,
  With an HCMV (AD 169) monoclonal antibody, yo!
  
  We got that peroxidase conjugate, it's the key,
  Detecting the virus, that's what we wanna see.
  But hold up, there's more, DNA hybridization,
  Using a 32P-labelled HCMV (AD 169) Eco R1 D fragment probe, no imitation.
  
  Now let's talk sensitivity, it's off the charts,
  Enzyme immunofiltration, it's makin' its marks.
  1.82 X 10(3) infected cells, that's what it found,
  DNA hybridization, 1.13 X 10(3), hold it down.
  
  Both methods are specific, they know what's up,
  But enzyme immunofiltration, it's faster, yup.
  And simpler too, ain't no time to waste,
  So when it comes to speed, it takes first place.
  
  That's the study, wrapped up in a rap,
  Enzyme immunofiltration and DNA hybridization, that's a wrap.