Lectio (ratio)
Lectio est multiplex ratio cognitiva qua via homo symbola enodat ut significationem construat vel derivet (comprehensio lectionis). Quae est modus quaestus linguae, communicationis, et informationis notionumque partiendarum. Sicut omnes linguae, lectio est multiplex interactio inter textum et lectorem, quae per priorem lectoris scientiam, experientias, habitus, linguisticamque culturae societatisque communitatem formatur.

Ratio legendi exercitationem, progressum, emendationem continuam exiget; praeterea, creativitatem et enodationem criticam poscit. Qui litteras consument quaque re periculum subeunt, se de vocabulis propriis penitus declinantes ad imagines excogitandas quae ei in sitibus ignotis per textus descriptos intellegere possunt. Legere, quia ratio tam multiplex est, nec contineri, nec ad unam aut duas interpretationes circumscribi potest.

Non sunt firmae lectionis regulae, sed potius legere effugium lectoribus sinit ut ei sua opera intus in mente producant. Quod profundo reconditoque textuum explorationi favet cum explicentur. Lectores variis legendi rationibus utuntur ad enodationem (symbola in sonos vel repraesentationes orationis convertere) et comprehensionem iuvandam. Lectores indiciis contextualibus uti possunt ad significationem verborum ignotorum agnoscendam. Lectores vocabula quae legunt in eorum scientiae formam exstantem inserunt (theoria schematum).
Alia legendi genera, sicut notatio musica et pictogrammata, non sunt systema scribendi in oratione condita. Nexus communis est interpretatio symbolorum ad significationem extrahendam e notationibus oculorum vel signis tangendi (ut in scriptura Braille).

Pinacotheca

Alexia
Alphabetismus
Dyslexia
 Educatio primaria
Liber
Dies libris et iuris auctorum
Phonetica
Phonica synthetica

Notae

Bibliographia

Bainbridge, Joyce, et Grace Malicky. 2000. Constructing meaning: balancing elementary language arts. Toronti: Harcourt. ISBN 0774736607.
Banai, K., J. Hornickel, E. Skoe, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, et N. Kraus. 2009. Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cerebral Cortex 19(11): 2699–707. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp024. PMC 2758683. PMID 19293398.
Bulling, Andreas, Jamie A. Ward, Hans Gellersen, et Gerhard Tröster. 2008. Robust Recognition of Reading Activity in Transit Using Wearable Electrooculography. In Pervasive Computing Berolini et Heidelbergae: Springer, 19–37. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79576-6_2. ISBN 9783540795759.
Burke, Peter, et Asa Briggs. 2002. A social history of the media: from Gutenberg to the Internet. Cantabrigiae: Polity. ISBN 0745623751.
Castles A., M. Coltheart, K. Wilson, J. Valpied, et J. Wedgwood. 2009. The genesis of reading ability: what helps children learn letter-sound correspondences? Journal of experimental child psychology 104(1): 68–88. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.003. PMID 19268301.
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. Reading as Poaching. In The Practice of Everyday Life, conv. Steven F. Rendall. Berkeleiae: University of California Press.
Devlin, J. T., H. L. Jamison, L. M. Gonnerman, et P. M. Matthews. 2006. The role of the posterior fusiform gyrus in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(6): 911–22. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.911. PMC 1524880. PMID 16839299.
Duncan, L. G., S. P. McGeown, Y. M. Griffiths, S. E. Stothard, et A. Dobai. 2015. Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology 107: 209–238. doi:10.1111/bjop.12134.
Fiez, J. A., et S. E. Petersen. 1998. Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95(3): 914–21. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.914. PMC 33816. PMID 9448259.
Fiez, J. A., D. Tranel, D. Seager-Frerichs, et H. Damasio. 2006. Specific reading and phonological processing deficits are associated with damage to the left frontal operculum. Cortex 42(4): 624–43. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70399-X. PMID 16881271.
Gibson, C. J., et J. R. Gruen. 2008. The human lexinome: genes of language and reading. Journal of communication disorders 41 (5): 409–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.03.003. PMC 2488410. PMID 18466916.
Gipe, Joan P. 1998. Multiple Paths to Literacy: Corrective Reading Techniques for Classroom Teachers. Merrill Publishing. ISBN 0137850808.
Gößwald, Udo, ed. 2016. Die Magie des Lesens. Berolini: Museum Neukölln. ISBN 9783944141190.
Heim, S., et A. D. Friederici. 2003. Phonological processing in language production: time course of brain activity. NeuroReport 14(16): 2031–3. doi:10.1097/00001756-200311140-00005. PMID 14600492.
Hoover Wesley A., et Philip B. Gough. 1990. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2: 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799.
Lesaux, N. K., O. Lipka, et L. S. Siegel. 2006. Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing 19: 99–131. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6.
Manguel, Alberto. 1998. Eine Geschichte des Lesens. Berolini: Volk und Welt. ISBN 3353011013.
Nation, K. 2009. Form-meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B, Biological Sciences 364(1536): 3665–74. PMID 19933139. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0119. PMC 2846312.
Noble, K. G., et B. D. McCandliss. 2005. Reading development and impairment: behavioral, social, and neurobiological factors. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics 26(5): 370–8. doi:10.1097/00004703-200510000-00006. PMID 16222178.
Pugh, K. R., W. E. Mencl, A. R. Jenner, et al. 2001. Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders 34(6): 479–92. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00060-0. PMID 11725860.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(10): 1948–66. doi:10.1080/17470210802696104. PMID 19301209.
Ricketts, J., D. V. Bishop, et K. Nation. 2009. Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition. 
Sahin, N. T., S. Pinker, S. S. Cash, D. Schomer, et E. Halgren. 2009. Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science 326(5951): 445–9. doi:10.1126/science.1174481. PMC 4030760. PMID 19833971.
Shaywitz, S. E., et B. A. Shaywitz. 2008. Paying attention to reading: the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology 20(4): 1329–49. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000631. PMID 18838044.
Shaywitz, S. E., M. D. Escobar, B. A. Shaywitz, J. M. Fletcher, et R. Makuch. 1992. Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine 326(3): 145–50. doi:10.1056/NEJM199201163260301. PMID 1727544.
Stebbins, R. A. 2013. The Committed Reader: Reading for Utility, Pleasure, and Fulfillment in the Twenty-First Century. Lanhamiae Terrae Mariae: Scarecrow Press.
Svenbro, Jesper. 1976. La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque. Lund.
Svenbro, Jesper. 1993. Phrasikleia: An anthropology of reading in ancient Greece. Ithacae Novi Eboraci: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801497523.
Tan, L. H., J. A. Spinks, G. F. Eden, C. A. Perfetti, et W. T. Siok. 2005. Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(24): 8781–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503523102. PMC 1150863. PMID 15939871.
Turkeltaub, P. E., D. L. Flowers, L. G. Lyon, et G. F. Eden. 2008. Development of ventral stream representations for single letters. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1145: 13–29. doi:10.1196/annals.1416.026. PMID 19076386.
Valdois, S., M. Habib, et L. Cohen. 2008. [The reader brain: natural and cultural story]. Revue neurologique 164 (Suppl 3): 77–82. doi:10.1016/S0035-3787(08)73295-8. PMID 18675051.

Nexus externi
Situs proprius. International Reading Association, Reading.org.

Educatio
 
Linguistica adhibita
Orthographia
Systemata scribendi