1) This (attached below) is such an amazing use of Grok (AI/LLMs)— yes, yes, always verify outputs 

2) Who is going to explain to members of the Democratic Party that federal laws trump their ideological proclivities? Who is going to explain to them that federal laws (such as Title IX) are dealt with primarily at the federal level? 

3) Does anyone else think it’s funny that Dems are now seemingly … because of this … new States’ Rights Advocates 🤭😂

4) Please note for the record that, if Grok’s analysis is correct here: “women’s civil rights” are not a pressing issue to elected Dems. 

There’s so much more that could be said … 

Friendly reminder: 

Federal Law: “Title IX is the most commonly used name for the federal women’s civil rights law in the United States that was enacted as part of the Education Amendments of 1972. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government.” 

Title IX, protects based on sex not ‘gender identity.’ 

IMO: ‘gender identity’ and ‘racial identity’ are two of the nation’s most destructive ideological grifts from public policy standpoints. 

Like, on the social level, who cares: “identify as” whatever you want if subordinating reality is your preference and/or makes you feel whole— but science, government laws and government policies are COMPLETELY different avenues. And I mean no disrespect to people who identify in ways that are incompatible with the immutable biological construct that is their genome …