4fe251d1_nJDK_Governance___Wild_Webmink__Evaluation
[Rule] Copyright aggregation [Data] “A Contributor is a Participant who has signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement or who works for an organization that has signed that agreement or its equivalent. Only a Contributor may submit anything larger than a simple patch.” [Score] 0 [Evaluation] 
Copyright is explicitly aggregated solely in Oracle’s hands. There are actually good historic reasons for this and without it I doubt that either IBM or Apple would be involved in OpenJDK since it would be impossible for Oracle to privately license the resulting Java implementation to them under terms they would accept (neither of them like GPL). Furthermore it allows the existing Java licensing arrangements to be sustained, meaning OpenJDK can be the locus of development for Java SE. While I would rather see the overall copyright vested in a non-profit foundation, the pragmatic balance of factors means I score this as 0.
☆ Rating OpenJDK Governance | Wild Webmink
Evaluation