38751c01_ate_Science_Myths___PlanetSave__One_Liner
[0] 89 [Skeptic Argument] “Peer review process was corrupted” [3] The Independent Climate Change Email Review investigated the CRU scientists’ actions relating to peer review. In one case, it judged their strong reaction to a controversial paper was not unusual. In another, it turned out the alleged victim had actually been spreading malicious rumours about CRU. In a third, the allegation of collusion fell apart when the full email exchange was examined. The Review concluded that CRU’s actions were normal and did not threaten the integrity of peer review. [One Liner] 
An Independent Review concluded that CRU’s actions were normal and didn’t threaten the integrity of peer review.
119 One-Liners to Respond to Climate Science Myths | PlanetSave
One Liner