a6d5736f_nts_Pro___Con___Choice_Matters__Anti_Choice__RTL_
[Pro-choice] Abortion is not a luxury item; it is a necessary component of women’s health care. The government has decided to provide health care for the needy, and should not eliminate any medically necessary care. Since it is less expensive to subsidize an abortion than childbirth and subsequent welfare, the anti-abortion financial argument is invalid as well as inhumane. Another irony is that most anti-abortion legislators vote against funding the health and social welfare programs that make it possible for women to take care of their babies rather than abort for financial reasons. [Anti-Choice (RTL)] 
Our government can’t afford to give poor women free abortion on demand. The poor aren’t entitled to everything the rich have. If they get abortions, then next they’ll be asking for Cadillacs.
Legal Abortion: Arguments Pro & Con - Choice Matters
Anti-Choice (RTL)