9d38e4e7_OpenStreetMap__Post
[When] 6 months ago [Comment] Having looked at jackfifield's picture it feels more like a private site as the signs used by the operater are not correct to the highway code. The problem is that both the one-way and the no entry would apply to an entire carrageway regardless of which side of the road they were placed. In fairness as its private land the operator could invent there own signage (like at some highway service stations and shopping parking roads, though comprehension is usally best served by a degree of conformity. In the south of Oxford, UK there is a business estate that had a roundabout at the end of a front drive. As the front drive was laid as an all-purpose dual-carageway (4 lanes in all) the sidewalk that ran around the roundabout went though a very short paved path at the end of a bush (growing down the central reservation) as the plants grew up tall the site operater erected a sign faceing the oncoming traffic approching the roundabout (from the outside the park), that I guess was suppose to warn people about pedestians. Unfortunatly the sign chosen was a UK version of No Pedestians! So as it faced away from pedestians going to cross it was ignored by them and sent the inverse message to any drivers who could be justified to expect no pedestians crossing beyond that point. Needless to say it was just ignored. The site is at the rounderbout here (drive comes in from the north):- [Post] 
Learn-a-tag: driving_side=left/right
OpenStreetMap
Post