19ac42a2_rison_Chart_and_Expert_Reviews__23
[0] Cons [1] • Replaceable Media filters allow less airflow than electrostatic technology • not aesthetically pleasing [2] • lower airflow due to replaceable media filtration • not aesthetically pleasing [3] • Consumes slightly more energy to run than an electrostatic unit • Contains filters that need to be replaced [4] • Contains filters that need to be replaced • Consumes slightly more energy to run than an electrostatic unit [5] • Requires periodic filter replacement • CFM drops as filter becomes dirty • Not aesthetically pleasing [6] • Requires periodic filter replacement • CFM drops as filter becomes dirty • Not aesthetically pleasing [7] • Requires periodic filter replacement • CFM drops as filter becomes dirty • Not aesthetically pleasing [8] • Requires periodic filter replacement • CFM drops as filter becomes dirty • Not aesthetically pleasing [9] • Requires periodic filter replacement • CFM drops as filter becomes dirty • Not aesthetically pleasing [10] • Only good for light smoke. • Only covers a very small room • Louder than most [11] • Too small for more than an occasional cigarette • Very small coverage area [12] • Only good for light smoke. • Only covers a very small room • Louder than most [13] • Too small for more than an occasional cigarette • Only covers a very small room [14] • Periodic filter replacement required [15] • Periodic filter replacement required [16] • Periodic filter replacement required [17] • Not aesthetically pleasing • Requires costly periodic filter replacement • Floor placement limits immediate capture of rising smoke • Not effective for large rooms [18] • Not aesthetically pleasing • Requires costly periodic filter replacement • Floor placement limits immediate capture of rising smoke • Not effective for large rooms [19] • Media filters must be replaced • Media filtration allows less airflow than electrostatic air cleaners [20] • Media filtration allows less airflow than electrostatic air cleaners • Media filters must be replaced [21] • Media filters have to be replaced, as opposed to cleaned • Its powder-coat finish may not appeal to some people [22] • Not recommended for high humidity processes • Filters must be changed [24] • Requires periodic filter replacement • Requires installation above ceiling • Can only handle one small enclosed room [25] • 19.63" deep -Requires considerable space above ceiling level • Noticeably less airflow than its electrostatic counterpart [23] 
• Media filters cannot be washed and reused • Motor starter optional
Carbon Filter Smoke Eaters: Carbon Filter Smoke Eater Comparison Chart and Expert Reviews
23