ede32320_omplaints_against_interpreters__Outcome
[Date] 07/10 [Summary of complaint] Consumer filed complaint against interpreter for allegedly sending an e-mail communication to the LEP litigant and attorney regarding legal advice. [Relevant rule(s)] SCR 63.07 Scope of Practice [Outcome] 
No merit was found to this complaint as the alleged e-mail communication was never produced.
Wisconsin Court System - Complaints against interpreters
Outcome