38751c01_ate_Science_Myths___PlanetSave__One_Liner
[0] 118 [Skeptic Argument] “Naomi Oreskes’ study on consensus was flawed” [3] An examination of the papers that critics claim refute the consensus are found to actually endorse the consensus or are review papers (eg – they don’t offer any new research but merely review other papers). This led the original critic Benny Peiser to retract his criticism of Oreskes’ study. [One Liner] 
Benny Peiser, the Oreskes critic, retracted his criticism.
119 One-Liners to Respond to Climate Science Myths | PlanetSave
One Liner