ede32320_omplaints_against_interpreters__Outcome
[Date] 01/11 [Summary of complaint] Advocate filed complaint against interpreter for allegedly providing an opinion to the pro se party receiving interpreter services that may have been construed as legal advice. [Relevant rule(s)] SCR 63.07 Scope of Practice [Outcome] 
Conduct of the interpreter did not rise to the level of an ethical breach, however, interpreter may have overstepped role by providing information to the court directly as opposed to interpreting what the speakers were saying.
Wisconsin Court System - Complaints against interpreters
Outcome