559a8ece_AuditabilityReport_xml__Split_process
[0] Accessibility [Op scan] Access features difficult to provide from paper ballot; must convert print to alternative forms and eliminate paper handling [DRE] Wide variety of access features can be readily provided from digital form of electronic ballot. No paper handling required. [VVPAT] Access features difficult to provide from VVPAT; must convert print to alternative forms when VVPAT is or can be ballot of record [LVVPAT] Not actually improved versus VVPAT but possibly more legally defensible since cast verification is not guaranteed to sighted voters1 [Witness] So long as the voter is not verifying the secondary archival record, no access features would be needed [E2E crypto] Depends on form of voter verification. Whatever media is used by the voter to verify (paper, web site, etc.) would need to be made accessible. [Audit port] Depends on what is connected and if the voter is verifying the output of the attached device. Paper output will be more difficult to make accessible than digital output. [Split process] 
Depends on form of token. When token is paper, access features are difficult to deliver. When token is electronic, access features can more readily be provided but handling of token can still be access barrier. Both vote capture and verification stations must be accessible.
AuditabilityReport.xml
Split process