38751c01_ate_Science_Myths___PlanetSave__One_Liner
[0] 123 [Skeptic Argument] “CRU tampered with temperature data” [3] The Independent Climate Change Email Review went back to primary data sources and were able to replicate CRU’s results. This means not only was CRU not hiding anything, but it had nothing to hide. Though CRU neglected to provide an exact list of temperature stations, it could not have hid or tampered with data. [One Liner] 
An independent inquiry went back to primary data sources and were able to replicate CRU’s results.
119 One-Liners to Respond to Climate Science Myths | PlanetSave
One Liner