Whenreviewing the facts and the law of a given case, all courts,arbitral hearing panels and other adjudicating bodies shouldbe aware and respect the distinct nature of the anti-dopingrules in the Code and the fact that those rules represent theconsensus of a broad spectrum of stakeholders around theworld with an interest in fair sport.ARTICLE 1: DEFINITION OF DOPINGDoping is defined as the occurrence of one or more of theanti-doping rule violations set forth in Article 2.1 throughArticle 2.8 of the Code .ARTICLE 2: ANTI-DOPING RULE VIOLATIONSAthlete s or other Person s shall be responsible for knowingwhat constitutes an anti-doping rule violation and thesubstances and methods which have been included on theProhibited List .The following constitute anti-doping rule violations:[Comment ‘a’ to Article 2: Thepurpose of Article 2 is to specify thecircumstances and conduct whichconstitute anti-doping rule violations.Hearings in doping cases willproceed based on the assertionthat one or more of these specificrules has been violated.