The following is a non- exhaustive list of factors that may be considered in such an assessment:  7.2.2.1  (where the Signatory is an International Federation) the physiological ris k of doping in a particular sport/discipline;  7.2.2.2  (where the Signatory is an International Federation) participation of the Signatory  in the Olympic and/or Paralympic Games;  7.2.2.3  (where the Signatory is a Major Event Organization) the level of Athletes participating in the Event ;  7.2.2.4  performances by Athletes from a particular country in International Events ; 7.2.2.5  a history of doping in a particular country or a particular sport/discipline;        ISCCS – January 2021   Page 25 of 61 7.2.2.6  a Signatory ’s response to a Mandatory Information Request  or a Code Compl iance Questionnaire ;  7.2.2.7  receipt of credible intelligence or the results of an investigation suggesting there may be significant Non-Conformities  in the Signatory’s Anti-Doping Program ;  7.2.2.8  a Signatory’s  breach of Critical or High Priority  requirements under the Code  or an International  Standard;   7.2.2.9  a Signatory’s failure to implement recommendations following collaboration programs in which WADA acted as a facilitator or a party;  7.2.2.10  a Signatory’s  failure to implement measures (e.g., Target Testing) following a recommendation made or endorsed by WADA (e.g., in relation to Testing  in the lead- up to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games or other Event ); 7.2.2.11  (where the Signatory is a NADO or a National Ol ympic Committee acting as a NADO ) the fact that the Signatory ’s country hosts a WADA -accredited laboratory and/or is bidding to host or has won the right to host a major sporting event;  7.2.2.12  where a Signatory that has been found to be non -compliant is seeking to be Reinstated; and/or  7.2.2.13  a request by WADA’s Executive Committee and/or WADA’s Foundation Board.