If the Athlete  or other Person  rebuts the preceding presumption by showing that a departure from the International Standard  for Laboratories occurred which could reasonably have caused the Adverse Analytical Finding, then  the IOF  shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the Adverse Analytical Finding.14  3.2.3   Departures from any other International Standard  or other anti -doping rule or policy set forth in the Code or these Anti -Doping Rules shall not i nvalidat e analytical results or other evidence of an anti -doping rule violation, and shall not constitute a defense to an anti -doping rule violation;15 provided, however, if the Athlete  or other Person establishes that a departure from one of the specific Internati onal Standard  provisions listed below could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding  or whereabouts failure, then the IOF  shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the Adver se An alytical Finding or the w hereabouts failure:   (i)  a departure from the International Standard for Testing  and Investigations related to Sample collection or Sample handling which could reasonably have caused an anti -doping rule violation based on an Adver se Analytical Finding, in which case t he IOF  shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the Adverse Analytical Finding;   (ii)  a departure from the International Standard for Results Management  or International Standard for Testin g and Investigations related to an Adverse Passport Finding  which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violation, in which case the IOF  shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the anti -doping rule violation;   (iii)  a departure from the International Standard for Results Management  related to the requirement to provide notice to the Athlete of the B Sample opening which could reasonably have caused an anti -doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding , in which case  14  [Comment to Article 3.2.2: Error!