And it iscertain that a requirement of intent wouldinvite costly litigation that may well cripplefederations - particularly those run onmodest budgets - in their fight againstdoping.” 2..11..3  Comment:  For example, theProhibited List might provide that a T/Eratio greater than 6:1 is doping unless alongitudinal analysis of prior orsubsequent test results by the Anti-Doping Organization demonstrates anaturally elevated ratio or the Athleteotherwise establishes that the elevatedratio is the result of a physiological orpathological condition.9ARTICLE  1:    DEFINITION  OF  DOPINGDoping is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the anti-doping rule violations set forth in Article 2.1 through Article 2.8 ofthe Code .ARTICLE  2:    ANTI-DDOPING  RULE  VIOLATIONSThe following constitute anti-doping rule violations:2.1 The presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolitesor Markers in an Athlete’s bodily Specimen.2.1.1It is each Athlete’s personal duty to ensure that noProhibited Substance enters his or her body.