The decision by WADA  and the Anti-Doping Organization to enter or not enter into a case resolution agreement, and the amount of the reduction to, and the starting date of the period of Ineligibility, are not matters for determination or review by a hearing body and are not subject to appeal under Article 13.If so requested by an Athlete or other Person who seeks to enter into a case resolution agreement under this Article, the Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management responsibility shall allow the Athlete or other Person to discuss an ARTICLE 10  Sanctions on IndividualsWorld Anti-Doping Code 202179admission of the anti-doping rule violation with the Anti-Doping Organization subject to a Without Prejudice Agreement.7110.9 Multiple Violations10.9.1 Second or Third Anti-Doping Rule Violation10.9.1.1 For an Athlete or other Person’s second anti-doping rule violation, the period of Ineligibility shall be the greater of:(a) A six-month period of Ineligibility; or(b) A period of Ineligibility in the range  between: (i) the sum of the period of Ineligibility imposed for the first anti-doping rule violation plus the period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable to the second anti-doping rule violation treated as if it were a first violation, and (ii) twice the period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable to the second anti-doping rule violation treated as if it were a first violation.The period of Ineligibility within this range shall be determined based on the entirety of the circumstances and the Athlete or other Person’s  degree of Fault with respect to the second violation.71 [Comment to Article 10.8.2: Any mitigating or aggravating factors set forth in this Article 10 shall be considered in arriving at the Consequences set forth in the case resolution agreement, and shall not be applicable beyond the terms of that agreement.In some countries, the imposition of a period of Ineligibility is left entirely to a hearing body.