For example, if in a process consistent with the Code a non -Signatory has found an Athlete to have committed an anti -doping rule violation on account of the presence of a Prohibited Substance in the Athlete’ s body but the period of Ineligibil ity applied is shorter than the period provided for in the Code, then WAKO  and all other Signatories should recognize the finding of an anti -doping rule violation and the Athlete’s National Anti -Doping Organization should  conduct a hearing consistent with Article 8 to determine whether the longer period of Ineligibility provided  in the Code should be imposed.