After threeyears experience with the Code, thestrong consensus of stakeholders isthat while the occurrence of an anti-doping rule violation under Articles2.1 (Presence of a ProhibitedSubstance or its Metabolites orMarkers) and 2.2 (Use of a ProhibitedSubstance or Prohibited Method)should still be based on the principleof strict liability, the Code sanctionsshould be made more flexible wherethe Athlete or other Person canclearly demonstrate that he or shedid not intend to enhance sportperformance.