For example, if in a process consistent with the Code a non-Signatory has found a Rower to have committed an anti-doping rule violation on account of the presence of a Prohibited Substance in the Rower’s body but the period of Ineligibility applied is shorter than the period provided for in the Code, then FISA and all other Signatories should recognise the finding of an anti-doping rule violation and the Rower’s National Anti-Doping Organisation should conduct a hearing consistent with Article 8 to determine whether the longer period of Ineligibility provided in the Code should be imposed.