Before an appeal is commenced, any post-decision review provided in the Anti-DopingOrganization’s rules must be exhausted, provided thatsuch review respects the principles set forth in Article13.2.2 below.13.2Appeals from Decisions Regarding Anti-Doping RuleViolations, Consequences , and Provisional SuspensionsA decision that an anti-doping rule violation wascommitted, a decision imposing Consequences for ananti-doping rule violation, a decision that no anti-dopingrule violation was committed, a decision that an Anti-Doping Organization lacks jurisdiction to rule on analleged anti-doping rule violation or its Consequences ,112  Comment:  This Article makes itclear that the Code does not restrictwhatever disciplinary rights betweenorganizations may otherwise exist.113..11  Comment:  The comparableOMADC Article is broader in that itprovides that any dispute arising outof the application of the OMADC maybe appealed to CAS.participate in local sport events in a sport other than thesport in which the Person committed the anti-doping ruleviolation, but only so long as the local sport event is not ata level that could otherwise qualify such Person directly orindirectly to compete in (or accumulate points toward) anational championship or International Event .10.10Reinstatement TestingAs a condition to regaining eligibility at the end of aspecified period of Ineligibility , an Athlete must, duringany period of Provisional Suspension or Ineligibility ,make him or herself available for Out-of-CompetitionTesting by any Anti-Doping Organization having testingjurisdiction, and must, if requested, provide current andaccurate whereabouts information.