]10.6.1.3  Protected Persons or Recreational AthletesWhere the anti-doping rule violation not involving a Substance of Abuse is committed by a Protected Per -son or Recreational Athlete, and the Protected Person or Recreational Athlete can establish No Significant Fault or Negligence for the anti-doping rule violation(s) alleged against him or her, then the period of Ineligibility will be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility, and at a maximum, two years’ Ineligibility, depending on the Protected Person or Recreational Athlete’s degree of Fault.10.6.2  Application of No Significant Fault or Negligence beyond the application of Article 10.6.1If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case where Article 10.6.1 is not applicable that they bear No Significant Fault or Negligence, then (subject to further reduction or elimination as provided in Article 10.7) the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility may be reduced based on the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault, but the reduced period of Ineligibility may not be less than one-half of the period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable.