WAKO Anti-Doping Rules       Page 53 of 81 Where WADA  has a right to appeal under Article 13 and no other party has appealed a final decision within WAKO’s process, WADA  may app eal such decision directly  to CAS without having to exhaust other remedies in WAKO’s process.64  13.2 Appeals from Decisions Regardin g Anti -Doping  Rule Violations, Consequences , Provisional Suspensions,  Implementation of Decisions  and Authority   A decision that an anti -doping rule v iolation was committed, a decision imposing Consequences  or not imposing Consequences  for an anti -doping rule violation, or a decision that no anti -doping rule violation was committed; a decision that an anti -doping rul e violation  proceeding cannot go forw ard for procedural reasons (including, for example, prescription); a decision by WADA  not to grant an exception to the six (6) months notice requirement for a retired Athlete  to return to competition  under Article 5.6.1 ; a decisio n by WADA  assigning Result s Management  under Article 7.1 of the Code ; a decision by WAKO  not to bring forward an Adverse Analytical Finding  or an Atypical Finding  as an anti -doping rule violation, or a decision not to go forward with an anti -doping rule vi olation after an investiga tion in accordance with the International Standard  for Results Management ; a decision to impose, or lift, a Provisional Suspension as a result of a Provisional Hearing ; WAKO’s failure to comply with Article 7.4; a decis ion that WA KO lacks authority to rule  on an alleged anti-doping rule violation or its Consequences ; a decision to suspend, or not suspend, Consequences  or to reinstate, or not reinstate, Consequences  under Article 10.7.1; failure to comply with Articles 7.