*C14*AD-3.2.3Departures from any other International Standard or other anti-doping rule or policy set forth in the Code or theseAnti-Doping Rules shall not invalidate analytical results or other evidence of an anti-doping rule violation, and shallnot constitute a defense to an anti-doping rule violation; *C15* provided, however, if the Athlete or other Personestablishes that a departure from one of the specific International Standard provisions listed below could reasonablyhave caused an anti-doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding or whereabouts failure, thenWorld Archery shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the Adverse Analytical Findingor the whereabouts failure:(i) a departure from the International Standard for Testing and Investigations related to Sample collection or Samplehandling which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding,in which case World Archery shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the AdverseAnalytical Finding;(ii) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management or International Standard for Testing andInvestigations related to an Adverse Passport Finding which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping ruleviolation, in which case World Archery shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the anti-doping rule violation;(iii) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management related to the requirement to providenotice to the Athlete of the B Sample opening which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violationbased on an Adverse Analytical Finding, in which case World Archery shall have the burden to establish that suchdeparture did not cause the Adverse Analytical Finding; *C16*(iv) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management related to Athlete notification which couldreasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violation based on a whereabouts failure, in which case World Archeryshall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the whereabouts failure.AD-3.2.4The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary tribunal of competent jurisdiction which isnot the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom thedecision pertained of those facts unless the Athlete or other Person establishes that the decision violated principles ofnatural justice.Version 2021-01-05 17:15:34 Page 6 / 39AD-3.2.5The hearing panel in a hearing on an anti-doping rule violation may draw an inference adverse to the Athlete orother Person who is asserted to have committed an anti-doping rule violation based on the Athlete’s or otherPerson’s refusal, after a request made in a reasonable time in advance of the hearing, to appear at the hearing(either in person or telephonically as directed by the hearing panel) and to answer questions from the hearing panelor World Archery.AD-4The Prohibited ListAD-4.1Incorporation of the Prohibited ListThese Anti-Doping Rules incorporate the Prohibited List, which is published and revised by WADA as described in Article 4.1of the Code.Unless provided otherwise in the Prohibited List or a revision, the Prohibited List and revisions shall go into effect under theseAnti-Doping Rules three (3) months after publication by WADA, without requiring any further action by World Archery or itsNational Federations.