UWW  2021 Anti -Doping Rules  Page 44 of 66    13.1.2  CAS Shall Not Defer to the Findings Being Appealed   In making its decision, CAS shall not give deference to the discretion exercised by the body whose decision is being appealed.64  13.1.3  WADA Not Required to Exhaust Internal Remedies   Where WADA  has a right to appeal under Article 13 and no other party has appealed a final decision within UWW ’s process, WADA  may appeal such decision directly to CAS  without having to exhaust other remedies in UWW ’s process.65  13.2 Appeals from Decisions Regarding  Anti-Doping  Rule Violations, Consequences, Provisional Suspensions,  Implementation of Decisions  and Authority   A decision that an anti -doping rule violation was committed, a decision imposing Consequences  or not imposing Consequences  for an anti -doping rule violation, or a decision that no anti -doping rule violation was committed; a decision that an anti -doping rule violation proceeding cannot go forward for procedural reasons (including, for example, prescription); a decision by WADA not to grant an exception to the six (6) months  notice requirement for a retired Athlete  to return to c ompetition  under Article 5.