13.1.3   W ada Not Requir ed to Exhaust i nternal Remedies   Where Wada has a right to appeal under Article 13 and no other party has appealed a final decision within the anti-doping organization’s process, Wada may appeal such decision directly to CaS without having to exhaust other remedies in the anti-doping organization’s process.13.2  Appeals from Decisions Regarding Anti-Doping Rule Violations, Consequences, Provisional Suspensions, Recognition of Decisions and Jurisdiction  A decision that an anti-doping rule violation was committed, a decision imposing Consequences or not imposing Consequences for an anti-doping rule violation, or a decision that no anti-doping rule violation was committed; a decision that an anti-doping rule violation proceeding cannot go forward for procedural reasons (including, for example, prescription); a decision by Wada not to grant an exception to the six months notice requirement for a retired athlete to return to Competition under Article 5.7.1; a decision by Wada assigning results management under Article 7.1; a decision by an  [Comment to Article 13.1.3: Where a decision has been rendered before the final stage of an Anti-Doping Organization’s process (for example, a first hearing) and no party elects to appeal that decision to the next level of the Anti-Doping Organization’s process (e.g., the Managing Board), then WADA may bypass the remaining steps in the Anti-Doping Organization’s internal process and appeal directly to CAS.