Title: Ene 8 Rev DS 13.01.18.pdf
First credit Criterion 1. An analysis of transport demand and patterns for the building has been carried out by the design team to determine the optimum number and size of lifts and counterbalancing ratio on the basis of anticipated passenger demand. A lift transport assessment study has been carried out (Ene8.v02) and the existing number of lifts is considered to be sufficient.Criterion 2. The energy consumption for at least two types of lift or lift strategy ‘fit for purpose’ has been estimated and the system with the lowest energy consumption specified. Ene8.v01 confirms that two lift systems have been assessed and the one with the lowest energy consumption has been selected.Second credit Criterion 3. The first credit is achieved.Criterion 4. Of the following energy-efficient features, the three that offer the greatest potential energy saving are specified:BREEAM-NOR ver.1.1 (2012) New Construction Assessment Report Template Rev. 02: 11.10.2015Dronning Mauds gate 1-359 of 114