Back to 1957, Warren S. Walker’s study has already provoked a dialogue about whether or not or no longer or now not “The Garden Party” is a united and whole story. He claimed that “‘The Garden Party’ typically leaves readers with a feeling of dissatisfaction, a vague experience that the story by using some potential does now no longer apprehend its potential”.
He then pointed out that “the difficulty” is that “the combat has a twin nature, completely part of which is resolved effectively” , and as to the type query raised in the story, “no hint of any answer… is to be decided in the conclusion”. Walker’s view used to be in the route of by using way of ability of Robert Murray Davis who grew to emerge to “examine the symbols and pics of the story and their vicinity in the easy pattern”.
By this means, Davis claimed that readers “can neighborhood the battle inside Laura alone” and “restore Laura to her appropriate neighborhood as a persona with whom the reader sympathizes” (ibid), as the end result he can pick out the vary and team spirit in this story. These two searches for verify the debatable nature and they vary in the things of this story and the most obvious theme in this story is the category bother and Laura’s change. Laura the important personality is a young woman from an upper-middle kind family, who, in a backyard party, faces straight away the reality of the social classification by way of the dying of the lousy carter.
Text’s dubious mindset toward category troubles leads researchers to doubt whether or not or now not a conclusive reply can be decided in the narration of this story. Studies have high-quality attitudes in the course of this question. Wang Ye analyzes the state of affairs in which Laura is suffering the marginalization and spoil up of the subject, and confirms that the doable way to a best world is to throw away the middle-class prejudice and exhibit love to surpass the editions between the classes. However, this opinion is no longer supported by William Atkinson, who mentions “Laura’s middle-class tendency to aestheticize the unfamiliar and thereby neutralize it”, and for that purpose, he argues that “Laura and the readers are thrust again into a fallen world characterized by way of the use of hierarchy and apprehended in phrases of formal order” Sebnem Kaya also suggests a pessimistic mind-set toward Laura’s future with the aid of the use of the capability of scrutinizing Sheridan family’s “conventional then again false education” on Laura, which Laura cannot get rid of and continues Laura from seeing the actuality in the outside world. What’s worse, the unprepared contact with the social fact would maybe also reason Laura to alternate into “an uncertain, inconsistent and susceptible adult” .