The world is prominent, and it contains many secrets. Those secrets are held and kept by people from all over the globe. The American government is an example of everything that is held and kept from the public based on information that is tending to be told. The right to privacy is our right to stay in the province around the United States of America, which incorporates all those things that are apart from ourselves, like our human body, home, our property, thoughts, feelings, secrets, and identity. The proper to privacy offers the United States of America the flexibility to decide on those components through the realm of the information or other things that can be often accessed by anyone. The discourse for private information is still in part of the discussion. Particularly with the utilization of the internet, during this day and age, social networks are driving new sorts of social interaction and also the convenience has made others inquisitive of what is our right to privacy. Once people can gather numerous items of knowledge concerning individuals, they apprehend all that is required to steal your identity or maybe spy on somebody. Whether or not the information is correct or not, misjudgment can cause a consequence to the individual that is being affected. The role of democracy is simply the form of government that provides its citizens with the most freedom, opportunity, prosperity and having a sufficient life. Even though the American people live in a democracy, controversies about privacy provide the idea of corruption to the public eye. Democracies should protect privacy since the initial purpose of a democratic nation is to let people live their lives without the fear that they do not have their rights being diminished.
The background of privacy became very prominent since the outcome of 9/11. The event has made an impact on how the stance of the right of privacy is being portrayed. In the morning in New York City, on September 11th the United States awareness of protection was altered eternally. On that day, American Airlines Flight 11 transporting around 90 individuals on the board, impacting into the World Trade Center’s North Tower. Nearby, after a couple of minutes overdue another airplane, which is the Airlines Flight 175, carryed around 60 innocents on the board further crashed towards the direction of the World Trade Center at the South Tower. Additional two disasters were concerning taking place in two different districts and two different airplanes. One plane crashes in the ground and another crash around in the Pentagon. On that Tuesday morning, September 11th, 2001, the subversive action took the existence and injured The American people. For that, a large number of victims are going to live through the trauma mentally and physically. The tragedy that occurred through the act of terror led to the passing of a law that is so significant that it changes the way peoples in American run things to make sure a tragedy like 9/11 will never happen ever again, which is the USA Patriot Act. After the law was passed, it allowed the government to find ways to catch terrorists, it gave officials to access personal records and private information, and pretty much the feds search everything from voice mails to social media.
The role of the government based on privacy can be diminishing, considering the fact that finding information can be incongruous. “The value of information is demand-driven. In other words, the value of information depends on how many people have used it or how many “hits” it has received from the cyber world” (Haque, 2015). Information is very valuable and to anyone that can easily access it can concern individuals for its tremendous use of the internet causes mishap to anyone. In Peter Singer in his essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets”, presents his argument for the conservation of the persons’ privacy rights while also arguing for governments to become more transparent, creating an overall controversial component as he states “the standards of what we want to keep private and what we want to make public are constantly evolving” (Singer, 354). The amount of effort the people do to collect information goes against the beliefs of what living in a democratic nation stood for. Even though there are reasons for invading private information, it has its drawbacks as “if someone is misinformed and carries that information (without validation), they bear the burden of carrying false information, hence that knowledge has no value” (Haque, 2015). The result of misinformation can be very dangerous because that can ruin people’s reputation with the faults of that individuals’ invalid reasoning behind invading someone’s privacy.
The government interference with privacy through monitoring information of people makes it inquisitive to people’s rights and if democracy is pervaded. “Several recent trends and government initiatives which aim to enhance the capability for surveillance and detecting potential criminals or terrorists also feed growing apprehensions that the future may not bode well for the right to privacy” (Lass-Mikko & Sutrop, 2012). The Government involvement through secretly checking information gives the purpose of the countless tragedies that occurred in America. Turning away from the issue of privacy demonstrates what really is respected if the values of privacy that are embedded in the United States of America is not the priority since “if violation of privacy is seen in an ordinary way as only the violation of individual rights, then what we see in reality is that by limiting people’s autonomy we also damage the functioning of democracy, which is required for the full self-realization of persons” (Lass-Mikko & Sutrop, 2012).
Without the right of privacy, the whole idea of prosperity is driven to pandemonium.“A society without privacy protection would be suffocating, and it might not be a place in which most would want to live” ( Stalla-Bourdillon, 2014). If we were to live in a nation without the right of privacy the people will create continuous protests for the main value of privacy is to simply have people have the freedom to be allowed to do things that they want to do without the government to spy on them. America can not function in society if that were to happen. “When protecting individual rights, we as a society decide to hold back in order to receive the benefits of creating the kinds of free zones for individuals to flourish” (Stalla-Bourdillon, 2014). Securing the people’s rights will not only change the public opinion of the government but to only let the people know that the corruption of the government has nothing to hide from the people if it is even possible to maintain that accountability.
I can say that there are people that are going to disagree with my main points that ties to my thesis of that government should not interfere with the privacy of the people. People with their views on information that involves going through people information would have some reasons. There are people who are affected by the topic of privacy based on their experiences for example like 9/11. Events like that can make a person a very strong opinion about it. Some can say that government interference can make lives for people the better since finding information that can be threatful towards everyone. Since the events that occurred in America that cause the lives of people really took a toll of how information is being used at today. Some say that would be a good argument to state since people have their opinions of the government’s involvement. Also, some can say that if there is a potential threat that can harm others it is reasonable for the government to interfere even the right to privacy is the main factor for the argument within the people to have a say on the topic.
In today’s society, the word “privacy” has become omnipresent. When talking about whether government surveillance and data collection pose a threat to privacy, the most common retort against privacy advocates by people who are in favor of databases, video surveillance, spyware, data motoring and other modern surveillance measures that make sure everyone is safe. Events that threaten the public gives the government an excuse to look at private information. Democracy is all about living your life without anyone trying to invade it. In the future, I can say the greater the conflict through countless threats, the more challenging it gets to feel like the government is not watching you.