A Canadian court has asked for the re-examination of a case in which insurer Intact was told it had a duty to defend a client over a workplace death in 2013. Judges had earlier ruled against Intact, which said its policy didn't cover the National Gallery of Canada's defence against claims from the family of maintenance worker Conrad Lafreniere, who died while working at the cultural centre. The order was set aside on appeal in Pasiechnyk because the original hearing “did not conduct the necessary analysis" of the case, the higher court said.
A Canadian court has asked for the re-examination of a case in which insurer Intact was told it had a duty to defend a client over a workplace death in 2013. Judges had earlier ruled against Intact, which said its policy didn't cover the National Gallery of Canada's defence against claims from the family of maintenance worker Conrad Lafreniere, who died while working at the cultural centre. The order was set aside on appeal in Ontario because the original hearing “did not conduct the necessary analysis" of the case, the higher court said.