‘Newspapers recognize that ad blocking technology is responding to a consumer demand… however, some ad blocking firms have implemented ad blocking business models that deceive consumers,’ the newspaper group said Arlington, VA – May 26, 2016 – The Newspaper Association of America (NAA) today filed a Complaint and Request for Investigation with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleging that certain ad blocking technologies and related services violate Section 5 of the FTC Act as unfair and deceptive trade practices. NAA requests that the FTC investigate ad blockers that offer “paid whitelisting,” substitute ad blockers’ own advertising for blocked ads, claim that subscription services prevent publisher harm, and facilitate the evasion of metered subscription systems. “Newspapers recognize that ad blocking technology is responding to a consumer demand, and publishers are working diligently to improve the ad experience for consumers. However, some ad blocking firms have implemented ad blocking business models that deceive consumers. These practices undercut our members’ ability to provide a satisfying customer experience because the consumer is not receiving the whole truth,” said NAA President & CEO David Chavern. The complaint calls on the FTC to investigate Eyeo’s practice of using paid whitelisting that misleads the consumer into believing the “acceptable” advertisement is based on quality, when in fact advertisements are passed along to consumers if advertisers pay a fee. The complaint brings attention to other ad blocking technologies that replace existing advertising with the ad-blockers own advertising, which misleads consumers into believing that publishers have consented to the substitution. It also requests investigation of subscription services that claim to offset publisher harm, a deceptive assertion given the complete lack of evidence that nominal subscription prices will recover millions of dollars in lost advertising revenue. Finally, the complaint calls attention to ad blockers that permit users to evade metered subscription services and paywalls, which are engaging in an unfair method of competition. “The deceptive activities of these ad blockers undercut publishers’ ability to innovate and respond to customer demands, and preempt publishers’ efforts to communicate with consumers about the importance of advertising or alternative mechanisms for supporting high-quality journalism content,” said Chavern.
The Newspaper Association of America (NAA) has lodged a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and requested an investigation into what it claims are deceptive ad-blocking technologies that mislead consumers. The Association asserts that certain ad-blockers contravene Section 5 of the FTC Act regarding unfair business practices because they trick consumers into thinking that publishers have agreed to the substitution of existing ads with the ad-blockers' own advertising whereas the reality is very different. The NAA has asked the FTC to focus its attention on ad-blocking companies that have implemented business models that deceive consumers and thereby, negatively affect their user experience.