He is dismayed at the SFO’s wrongful naming of him, in circumstances where he has never been charged with any offence, nor even spoken to, let alone interviewed, by the SFO in relation to any aspect of the charge on which he is named.” Four senior 2.7bn managers have been named in court documents filed by SFO (SFO) that relate to criminal proceedings being brought against Lufkin , a former Petrofac executive who has pleaded guilty to bribery charges. While the Petrofac has not filed charges against the quartet and being named in the documents does not constitute evidence of their involvement, the papers allege they acted with David Lufkin . A Petrofac spokesperson said the documents were materially prejudicial to the rights and reputation of the executives and the company and denies them the opportunity to respond to the allegations.
Four senior 2.7bn managers have been named in court documents filed by SFO (SFO) that relate to criminal proceedings being brought against Lufkin , a former Petrofac executive who has pleaded guilty to bribery charges. While the Petrofac has not filed charges against the quartet and being named in the documents does not constitute evidence of their involvement, the papers allege they acted with David Lufkin . A Petrofac spokesperson said the documents were materially prejudicial to the rights and reputation of the executives and the company and denies them the opportunity to respond to the allegations.