A Beijing court has ruled in favour of Facebook and against a Chinese company which had registered "face book" as a separate trademark. The court said the firm had "violated moral principles" with "obvious intention to duplicate and copy from another high-profile trademark". The Zhongshan Pearl River company had registered the name in 2014. Facebook is blocked in China but has recently gone on a charm offensive to access the Chinese market. The court statement - released on 28 April but not widely covered in English - has led Chinese local media to speculate whether Beijing's hardline stance against Facebook might soften. During a recent visit to China, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg met with China's propaganda chief Liu Yunshan as well as fellow media guru Jack Ma. In what critics described as a publicity stunt to win China's favour, he also went for a run on Beijing's Tiananmen Square despite heavy pollution. Western companies are frequently struggling to have their trademarks upheld in China as they have to prove that their brand name is also well known within the country. Only last week, Apple lost a trademark fight in China, meaning firms that sell handbags and other leather goods can continue to use the name "IPHONE". Xintong Tiandi trademarked "IPHONE" for leather products in China in 2010. Apple filed a trademark bid for the name for electronic goods in 2002, but it was not approved until 2013. Mark Armitage, a trademark lawyer at intellectual property firm Withers & Rogers, said there had been a change in attitude about intellectual property rights in China in recent years. "This appears to have been a case of 'squatting', which ... involves a Chinese company registering the name of a high-profile Western business in order to benefit by forcing the company to either buy it back or take the matter to court," he said. "This ruling demonstrates that courts are beginning to take this problem seriously. This is all the more interesting, as Facebook is currently barred from operating in China."
A court in the Chinese capital, Beijing , has ruled in favour of the Zhongshan Pearl River in a case that it brought against a Chinese company that had registered ‘face book’ as a separate trademark. The court ruled that Facebook company, which registered the name in last week , had “obvious intention to duplicate and copy from another high-profile trademark.” While China has blocked Facebook , the company is operating a high-profile campaign to try to gain access to the vast market. The court ruling has prompted observers to question whether this may be working and whether the government’s stance is softening. Other high-profile companies have not been as fortunate, with Apple losing a similar case last week when it was ruled that a local leather goods company could continue to brand its goods with the name ‘ Facebook ’.