( CNN ) -- The $ 1 billion patent dispute between Apple and Samsung picked back up in federal court in San Jose on Thursday , with both sides arguing over issues of damages amounts , bans on product sales and allegations of dishonesty on the part of the jury foreman . In August , a nine-person jury awarded Apple just more than $ 1 billion in damages from Samsung after three weeks of complicated and technical testimony . The jurors found that Samsung copied the iPhone and iPad designs for its own smartphone and tablet models , and calculated the damages amount using 109 pages of jury instructions and a 20-page verdict form . Now Apple is pushing to increase the amount of damages it was awarded by several hundred million dollars , and to ban Samsung from selling certain products that infringe on Apple patents . Samsung is fighting to chip away at the enormous settlement amount or to have it thrown out . As part of its strategy , the South Korean company is asking for a new trial , alleging that the foreman of the jury was willfully dishonest by not divulging he was sued by his former employer in 1993 , a company in which Samsung had invested . Judge Lucy Koh did n't make any rulings on the various post-trial motions on Thursday , but said she plans to issue the orders separately over the next month . A protracted legal battle after a jury verdict is not unusual in a case this large and complicated , and was expected by legal experts . `` It shows that there is a careful process ; the judge does get to review what the jury has done , '' says law professor Jay P. Kesan of the University of Illinois . Each side is armed with impressive and expensive legal teams that are also fighting smaller battles in other countries . While those legal costs are likely astronomical , they are dwarfed by what 's at stake : a global smartphone market that is expected to be worth $ 150 billion by 2014 . Currently , only 50 % of mobile phones in the world are smartphones , which means there 's a huge untapped market of potential smartphone customers . The judge urged both sides to reach a settlement , claiming it was best for consumers , the industry and both parties . `` I think it 's time for global peace , '' she said . However , a settlement still looks unlikely at this point -- both parties were made to meet before the trial began to discuss a settlement but nothing came of it . In court on Thursday , Samsung indicated it was willing to reach an agreement , saying the ball was in Apple 's court . Apple , however , wanted more . It said the awarded damages , which are for past infringements , are not enough to discourage Samsung from copying Apple patents in future smartphones and tablets . `` The key issue is whether there 's going to be a permanent injunction . That 's probably the hardest thing for Apple to get , '' said Kesan . He said the chance of a retrial was also very remote .
Apple was awarded several hundred million dollars in damages for patent infringement by Samsung in Thursday . The case was back in court in San Jose on August , though no new orders were issued . Apple wants to lower the damages amount or to have a retrial . Apple wants to raise the amount and ban Samsung from selling infringing products .