One of Britain’s leading researchers has warned of a “major blow” to national science if ministers cannot secure access to a massive research programme that is being drawn up by the EU. The Horizon Europe programme will fund €100bn in research projects, making it one of the largest science funds in the world. British researchers will be locked out unless the government negotiates an access deal in the coming months. Sir Paul Nurse, the Nobel prize-winning director of the Francis Crick Institute, in London, said the seven-year programme was so important that exclusion would see the UK drop out of the top tier of research nations. “There are three major power blocs in science in the world: Europe, the US and China. The UK has a lead role in Europe and will lose that world leadership in science unless we remain part of the European system,” Nurse told the Guardian. “If scientists in the UK couldn’t go for European grants, UK science would undoubtedly suffer.” Horizon Europe will assemble teams of world-class scientists from different countries to work on cancer, smart and carbon neutral cities, soil and food quality, healthy oceans and inland waters, and adaptation to the heating world. “Being left out of these significant efforts would be a major blow to British science,” Nurse said. Britain currently pays about £1bn into Europe’s Horizon 2020 programme and receives £1.5bn back in scientific research grants. More than a dozen non-member states have negotiated full access to the programme as “associated countries”, but involvement in its successor, Horizon Europe, which starts in January 2021, is still being thrashed out. “The process for non-member states will be decided in the coming months so we need to get this right to avoid being locked out,” Nurse said. With Britain set to leave the EU, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy has commissioned Sir Adrian Smith, the director of the Alan Turing Institute, in London, to review and advise on alternative research funding schemes. In response to a call for evidence from Smith, the Francis Crick Institute ran a survey of its research group leaders and found that 72 out of 74 (97%) who responded wanted to join Horizon Europe. The remaining two expressed no preference. In a written submission to the Smith review, the institute calls for the UK to secure access to Horizon Europe “as soon as possible”. Many of the group leaders at Nurse’s Institute were doubtful that Britain could set up a credible alternative to the European programme in a reasonable timeframe. Last year Sharon Tooze, an American group leader at the Crick, won a €2.5m grant from the European Research Council under Horizon 2020. “Any one country would struggle to come up with something that’s as coveted and well-respected by researchers worldwide,” she said. “The fierce competition for European Research Council grants undoubtedly boosts research output across Europe.” Being part of EU research programmes was not just about money, Nurse added. “Diversity and international collaboration are some of the great strengths of modern science and European science programmes are among the best in the world for bringing people with different perspectives together to address global challenges,” he said.
UK scientists could lose access to Francis Crick Institute funding after Brexit, according to EU Director Sir Paul Nurse. He said 97% of scientists had called for access to the Horizon Europe programme, which is set to spend €100bn ($113bn) backing research. He said not being able to use the programme would mean the UK falling out of the top group of research countries. Non-Francis Crick Institute members can belong to predecessor scheme Horizon 2020, but talks are still being held on participation in its Horizon Europe successor.