For that reason and others, the Constitutional Convention unanimously rejected term limits and the First Congress soundly defeated two subsequent term-limit proposals. Hamilton, who did not even support term limitations on the presidency, reasoned that imposing limits "would be a diminution of the inducements to good behavior." Madison said that some members of Congress will "by frequent re-elections, become members of long-standing; will be thoroughly masters of the public business." In fact, that has been the case. Over the years, term limits would have unseated Daniel Webster and Henry Clay 10 years before they forged the 1850 Compromise that held the Union together. Term limits would have cost us Everett Dirksen, who rallied Republicans around early civil-rights bills and Florida's own Claude Pepper, who long defended Social Security and Medicare against revenue raids. It was not the Federalists but their adversaries who clamored for term limits, perhaps because they were then out of power. Robert Livingston said it best at the New York convention to ratify the Constitution: "The people are the best judges who ought to represent them. To dictate and control them, to tell them who they shall not elect, is to abridge their natural rights." T.K. Wetherel Speaker Florida House of Representatives Tallahassee, Fla.
T. K. Wetherel, Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, writes the Wall Street Journal that an assertion that Alexander Hamilton would have supported term limits would be incorrect. The Constitutional Convention rejected term limits as did the first Congress. He added that Madison said members of Congress ...by frequent reelections," ..."will be thoroughly masters of the public business." He concludes that not Federalists, but those out-of-power clamored for term limits, adding that Robert Livingston, at the convention to ratify the Constitution, said "The people are the best judges (of) who should represent them...."