Anarcho-primitivists in particular argue that humans were better off in a state of nature in small tribes living close to the land, while anarchists in general argue that the negatives of state organization, such as hierarchies, monopolies and inequality, outweigh the benefits.
ˈænɚkˌoʊpɹˈɪmɪtˌɪvɪsts ɪn pɚtˈɪkjʊlɚɹ ˈɑːɹɡjuː ðæt hjˈuːmənz wɜː bˈɛɾɚɹ ˈɔf ɪn ɐ stˈeɪt ʌv nˈeɪtʃɚɹ ɪn smˈɔːl tɹˈaɪbz lˈɪvɪŋ klˈoʊs tə ðə lˈænd, wˌaɪl ˈænɑːɹkˌɪsts ɪn dʒˈɛnɚɹəl ˈɑːɹɡjuː ðætðə nˈɛɡətˌɪvz ʌv stˈeɪt ˌɔːɹɡɐnᵻzˈeɪʃən, sˈʌtʃ ɐz hˈaɪɚɹɑːɹkiz, mənˈɑːpəliz ænd ɪniːkwˈɔlᵻɾi, aʊtwˈeɪ ðə bˈɛnɪfˌɪts.