ðɪs kˈeɪs meɪntˈeɪnd ðætðə fˈɛdɚɹəl ɡˈʌvɚnmənt hæd ˈɔːlweɪz hæd plˈiːnɚɹi pˈaʊɚɹ ˌoʊvɚ tɹˈaɪbz ænd kʊd jˌuːnɪlˈæɾɚɹəli ˈæbɹəɡˌeɪt ˈɪndiən tɹˈiːɾi ɹˈaɪts dᵻspˈaɪt ðə pɹˈoʊtɛsts ʌvðə tɹˈaɪbz.
This case maintained that the federal government had always had plenary power over tribes and could unilaterally abrogate Indian treaty rights despite the protests of the tribes.