ɐ diːtˈeɪld ɐnˈæləsˌɪs ʌvðə stˈaɪl ʌvðə pˈʌblɪʃt ɪn tˈuː θˈaʊzənd θˈɜːtiːn ˈɑːɹɡjuːz ðˈæt "wˈɛɹæz ðə fˈɜːst pˈɑːɹt ʌvðə nˈæɹətˌɪv ʌv ᵻvˈɛnts ɪn ˌælɪɡzˈændɹiə sˌiːˌeɪtʃˈeɪtʃ. wˈʌn dˈæʃ twˈɛnti wˈʌn ɪz pɚtˈɪkjʊlɚli siːsˈɛɹiən, ðə kəŋklˈuːʒən ʌv ðæt pˈænəl twˈɛnti tˈuː dˈæʃ θˈɜːɾi θɹˈiː, ænd ðə nˈæɹətˌɪvz ʌv ᵻvˈɛnts ɪn ɪlˈɪɹɪkəm fˈoːɹɾi tˈuː dˈæʃ fˈoːɹɾi sˈɛvən, spˈeɪn fˈoːɹɾi ˈeɪt dˈæʃ sˈɪksti fˈoːɹ, ænd pˈɔntəs θˈɜːɾi fˈoːɹ dˈæʃ fˈoːɹɾi wˈʌn, sˈɪksti fˈaɪv dˈæʃ sˈɛvənti ˈeɪt ɑːɹ dɪstˈɪŋktli lˈɛs sˈoʊ".
A detailed analysis of the style of the  published in 2013 argues that "whereas the first part of the narrative of events in Alexandria (chh. 1-21) is particularly Caesarian, the conclusion of that panel (22-33), and the narratives of events in Illyricum (42-47), Spain (48-64), and Pontus (34-41, 65-78) are distinctly less so".