ðə kˈoːɹt ɹˈuːld fˈɜːðɚ ðætðə "nˈuː" pˈɑːlɪsi ˈɛɹiəz fˈɛl wɪðˌɪn ðɪ ɚɹˈɪdʒɪnəl ɑːbdʒˈɛktɪvz ʌvðə tɹˈiːɾi ʌv ɹˈoʊm, ðætðə kɹiːˈeɪʃən əvə nˈuː kˈoːɹt wʊd nˌɑːt ɪŋkɹˈiːs ðə dʒuːdˈɪʃəl pˈaʊɚɹ ɔːlɹˌɛdi dˈɛlɪɡˌeɪɾᵻd tə ðə jˌʊɹɹəpˈiən ˌɪnstɪtˈuːʃənz, ænd ðætðə plˈeɪntɪf hæd fˈeɪld tə ʃˈoʊ hˌaʊ ðə nˈuː pˈaʊɚz təbi ɡɹˈæntᵻd tə ðə kˈaʊnsəl ʌv mˈɪnɪstɚz kʊd θɹˈɛʔn̩ kˌɑːnstɪtˈuːʃənəl ɹˈaɪts.
The Court ruled further that the "new" policy areas fell within the original objectives of the Treaty of Rome, that the creation of a new court would not increase the judicial power already delegated to the European institutions, and that the Plaintiff had failed to show how the new powers to be granted to the Council of Ministers could threaten constitutional rights.