æz ʌv tˈuː θˈaʊzənd fˈɪftiːn, ðɛɹ hɐvbɪn wˈʌnhˈʌndɹɪd fˈɪfti fˈɛdɚɹəl sˈɜːkɪt kˈoːɹt dᵻsˈɪʒənz ðæt ɹᵻlˈaɪd ˌɔn bˌædʒɐkˈeɪdʒiən tə kəndˈʌkt ɐn ɛksˈɛsɪvnəs tˈɛst, bˌʌt ˈoʊnli fˈoːɹ ʌv ðˌɛm hæv fˈaʊnd ɛksˈɛsɪv fˈɔːɹfɪtʃɚ.
As of 2015, there have been 150 federal circuit court decisions that relied on Bajakajian to conduct an excessiveness test, but only 4 of them have found excessive forfeiture.