hiː ˈɔːlsoʊ ˈɑːɹɡjuːz ðæt kˈoʊltɚ hɐz ɪt bˈækwɚdz: ðɪ ˈɪʃuː ɪz nˌɑːt wˈɛðɚ ðɛɹ ɪz ˈɛvɪdəns ðæt səpˈoːɹts ˌɛvəlˈuːʃən θˈiəɹi, bˌʌt wˈɛðɚ ðɛɹ ɪz ˈɛvɪdəns ðæt ɪz ɛksplˈeɪnd baɪ ˌɛvəlˈuːʃən θˈiəɹi, sˈɪns saɪəntˈɪfɪk θˈiəɹiz ɑːɹ ɛksplɐnˈeɪʃənz fɔːɹ dˈeɪɾə.
He also argues that Coulter has it backwards: The issue is not whether there is evidence that supports evolution theory, but whether there is evidence that is explained by evolution theory, since scientific theories are explanations for data.