ɪn kˈɑːntɹæst tə ðoʊz fɪlˈɑːsəfɚz hˌuː wʊd pˈɔɪnt tə ðə tˈuː ˌɛvɪdˈɛnʃəl ɡˈæps əbˌʌv tʊ ˈɑːɹɡjuː ðæt sˈaɪəns ɪz nˌɑːt ɑːbdʒˈɛktɪv ðˈɛɹfoːɹ, lɔŋɡˈiːnoʊ ˈɑːɹɡjuːz ðæt skɹˈuːtɪni baɪ ðoʊz wɪð daɪvˈɜːs vˈæljuːz kæn ɪnstˈɛd səpˈoːɹt ðɪ ɑːbdʒɪktˈɪvᵻɾi ʌv sˈaɪəns.
In contrast to those philosophers who would point to the two evidential gaps above to argue that science is not objective therefore, Longino argues that scrutiny by those with diverse values can instead support the objectivity of science.