ɪn mˈeɪ tˈuː θˈaʊzənd tˈɛn, ðə ɡɹˈænd tʃˈeɪmbɚ ɹˈuːld, baɪ fˈoːɹtiːn vˈoʊts tə θɹˈiː, ðætðə kˈeɪs pɹɪzˈɛntᵻd nˈoʊ vaɪəlˈeɪʃən ʌv ˈɑːɹɾɪkəl sˈɛvən ˌiːsˌiːˌeɪtʃˈɑːɹ.
In May 2010, the Grand Chamber ruled, by 14 votes to 3, that the case presented no violation of Article 7 ECHR.