ðiːz mˈuːvz wɜː dɪzˈaɪnd tə mˈɪɾᵻɡˌeɪt pjˈuːɾətˌɪv ædvˈɜːs ɪfˈɛkts, sˈʌtʃ ɐz mˈɑːnɪtˌɛɹi ɛkspˈænʃən ænd dᵻlˈeɪz ɪn ɪndˈʌstɹɪəl stɹˈʌktʃɚɹəl ɐdʒˈʌstmənt, wˌɪtʃ kʊd ɚɹˈaɪz bɪkˈʌz əvə lˈɑːɹdʒ sˈɜːplʌs ʌv fˈʌndz ðɪ aɪdˈiə bˌiːɪŋ lˈɛs fˈʌndz wʊd dˈɪsɪplˌɪn ˈɪndʌstɹi ˌɪntʊ ɡɹˈeɪɾɚ ɪfˈɪʃənsi; ɐ pˈɑːlɪsi pɹˈoʊɡɹæm ˈɪndᵻkˌeɪɾɪŋ, mˈoːɹ sˌoʊ ðɐn ðə pɹˈiːviəs wˌʌn, ʃˈɪfts təwˈɔːɹdz nˈiːoʊlˌɪbɚɹəlˌɪzəm æz ɐn ˌaɪdɪˈɑːlədʒi.
These moves were designed to mitigate putative adverse effects, such as monetary expansion and delays in industrial 'structural adjustment', which could arise because of a large surplus of funds (the idea being less funds would 'discipline' industry into greater 'efficiency'; a policy program indicating, more so than the previous one, shifts towards neoliberalism as an ideology).