ðɪ ˈɪndʒɚɹi ɐlˈɛdʒd ɪn flˈæst wʌz ɪnstˈɛd ðə spəsˈɪfɪk ɛkstɹˈækʃən ʌv mˈʌni fɹʌmðə plˈeɪntɪf tə spˈɛnd ɪn ˈeɪd əvɚ ɹᵻlˈɪdʒən, ɐn ˈɪndʒɚɹi ðæt kʊd biː ɹiːdɹˈɛst baɪ ɐn ɪndʒˈʌŋkʃən, ɪn kˈɑːntɹæst tə ðæt ɐlˈɛdʒd ɪn ðɪs kˈeɪs.
The injury alleged in Flast was instead the specific extraction of money from the plaintiff to spend in aid of a religion, an injury that could be redressed by an injunction, in contrast to that alleged in this case.