ðə lˈɛɾɚ wɛnt ˌɔn tʊ ˈɑːɹɡjuː ðæt ðɪs ˈɑːɹɾɪkəl wʌz nˌɑːt ɐn ˈaɪsəlˌeɪɾᵻd ɛɡzˈæmpəl æz ɪɾ ˈædᵻd tʊ ɐ sˈɪɹiz ʌv ˈɑːɹɾɪkəlz ðæt ɐpˈɪɹd təbi dɪzˈaɪnd tʊ ˌʌndɚmˈaɪn klˈaɪmət sˈaɪəns ænd kˈɑːnsɪkwənt ɪmˈɪʃən ɹᵻdˈʌkʃən pɹˈoʊɡɹæmz.
The letter went on to argue that this article was not an isolated example as it added to a series of articles that appeared to be designed to undermine climate science and consequent emission reduction programs.