lˈɪpnɚɹ ɛkspɹˈɛsᵻz ɹˌɛzɚvˈeɪʃənz ˌɔn bɹˈɛɹɛtənz ɪntˌɜːpɹɪtˈeɪʃən, stˈeɪɾɪŋ ðˌɐɾɪt ɪz tˈɛknɪkli plˈɔːzᵻbəl, bˌʌt nˈoʊɾɪŋ ðˈæt "bɹˈɛɹɛtən kənsˈiːdz ðætðə fˌɪləsˈɑːfɪkəl ɪmpˈoːɹt ʌvðə pˈæsɪdʒ mˈeɪ biː ɹˌɛpɹᵻzˈɛntᵻd baɪ ðə tɹænslˈeɪʃən ðˈæt juː ɑːɹ, wˌɛɹ tˈæt æz ðæt wʊd ɹᵻfˈɜː tə ðə suːpɹˈiːm bˌiːɪŋ sˈæt slˈæʃ sˈæɾɪə.
Lipner expresses reservations on Brereton's interpretation, stating that it is technically plausible, but noting that "Brereton concedes that the philosophical import of the passage may be represented by the translation 'That you are', where tat as 'that' would refer to the supreme Being (sat/satya).