ɪn ɹᵻspˈɑːns tə kˈoʊltɚz sˈaɪɾɪŋ ʌv dʒˈɑːnəθən wˈɛlz ˈɑːɹɡjuːmənts kənsˈɜːnɪŋ pˈɛpɚd mˈɑːθ ˌɛvəlˈuːʃən, ˈiːən mˈʌsɡɹeɪv ˈɑːɹɡjuːz ðæt kˈoʊltɚ mɪsɹˌɛpɹᵻzˈɛnts ðə sɪɡnˈɪfɪkəns ʌvðə pˈɛpɚd mˈɑːθ ɛkspˈɛɹɪmənts, mˌeɪks ɐ nˈʌmbɚɹ ʌv fˈæktʃuːəl ˈɛɹɚz, ænd ˈeɪ "wˈaɪldli ˈɪɡnɚɹənt mɪsɹˌɛpɹᵻzˈɛntˈeɪʃən ʌv ˌɛvəlˈuːʃən."
In response to Coulter's citing of Jonathan Wells' arguments concerning peppered moth evolution, Ian Musgrave argues that Coulter misrepresents the significance of the peppered moth experiments, makes a number of factual errors, and a "wildly ignorant misrepresentation of evolution."