ɪn tˈuː θˈaʊzənd tˈuː, wˌɛn ðə nˈæʃənəl hˈaɪweɪ tɹˈæfɪk sˈeɪfti ɐdmˌɪnɪstɹˈeɪʃən ˌɛnˈeɪtʃtsˈɑː ˈɪʃuːd ɐ ɹˈuːl tʊ ˈɪmplɪmənt ɐ lˈɔː ðæt ɹᵻkwˈaɪɚd ɐ dɪvˈaɪs ɪn nˈuː vˈiəkəlz tə wˈɔːɹn dɹˈaɪvɚz wɛn ɐ tˈaɪɚ wʌz sɪɡnˈɪfɪkəntli ˌʌndɚɹɪnflˈeɪɾᵻd, bˌʌt ðə ɹˈuːl ɐlˈaʊd jˈuːs ʌv dɪvˈaɪsᵻz ðæt wʊd nˌɑːt wˈɔːɹn wɛn tˈuː ɔːɹ mˈoːɹ tˈaɪɚz wɜːɹ ˌʌndɚɹɪnflˈeɪɾᵻd, ðə lˌɪɾɪɡˈeɪʃən ɡɹˈuːp səksˈɛsfəli sˈuːd tə fˈoːɹs ˌɛnˈeɪtʃtsˈɑː tʊ ˈɪʃuː ɐ ɹˈuːl ðæt kəmplˈaɪd wɪð ðɪs ɪmpˈoːɹtənt sˈeɪfti mˈɛʒɚ pˈʌblɪk sˈɪɾɪzən vˈiː. mˈaɪntə.
In 2002, when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a rule to implement a law that required a device in new vehicles to warn drivers when a tire was significantly underinflated, but the rule allowed use of devices that would not warn when two or more tires were underinflated, the Litigation Group successfully sued to force NHTSA to issue a rule that complied with this important safety measure (Public Citizen v. Mineta).