haʊˈɛvɚ, ʃiː ɹˈoʊt sˈɛpɹətli tʊ ɛkspɹˈɛs ˈeɪ "lˈɑːɹdʒ ɹˌɛzɚvˈeɪʃən" tə ðə fˈɜːðɚ lˌɪmɪtˈeɪʃənz ˌɔn stˈændɪŋ ðætðə kˈoːɹt hæd ɐdˈɑːptᵻd ɪn dᵻsˈɪʒənz dˈeɪɾɪŋ fɹʌmðə lˈeɪt nˈaɪntiːnhˈʌndɹɪd sˈɛvənti z θɹuː ðɪ ˈɜːli nˈaɪntiːnhˈʌndɹɪd nˈaɪnti z, wˌɪtʃ ʃiː bᵻlˈiːvd wɜː nˌɑːt nˈɛsᵻsɚɹi tə səpˈoːɹt ðə kˈoːɹts ɹˈuːlɪŋ.
However, she wrote separately to express a "large reservation" to the further limitations on standing that the Court had adopted in decisions dating from the late 1970s through the early 1990s, which she believed were not necessary to support the Court's ruling.