ɔːlðˈoʊ ðə klˈeɪmz wɜː hˈɛld təbi ɪnvˈɛnʃənz wɪðˌɪn ðə mˈiːnɪŋ ʌv ˈɑːɹɾɪkəl fˈɪfti tˈuː wˈʌn, tˈuː ænd θɹˈiː ˈɛpk, ðeɪ wɜː fˈaʊnd tə lˈæk ɪnvˈɛntɪv stˈɛp.
Although the claims were held to be inventions within the meaning of Article 52(1), (2) and (3) EPC, they were found to lack inventive step.