Abstract:   In randomized experiments treatment and control groups should be roughly the
  samebalancedin their distributions of pretreatment variables But how
  nearly so Can descriptive comparisons meaningfully be paired with significance
  tests If so should there be several such tests one for each pretreatment
  variable or should there be a single omnibus test Could such a test be
  engineered to give easily computed pvalues that are reliable in samples of
  moderate size or would simulation be needed for reliable calibration What new
  concerns are introduced by random assignment of clusters Which tests of
  balance would be optimal To address these questions Fishers randomization
  inference is applied to the question of balance Its application suggests the
  reversal of published conclusions about two studies one clinical and the other
  a field experiment in political participation
  