<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: [docs] Remove ambiguity
username_0: @username_1 I couldn't infer what you meant from context. Would you prefer to reword this clause rather than remove it?
<issue_comment>username_1: @username_0 I mean that if you're only going to run on of the two Safaris then only one of the steps will be needed. But this LGTM anyway, people can probably figure out what steps they need.
<issue_comment>username_0: @username_1 Ah, maybe the clause is missing a single word: "in which case only **one** step is needed." However, that is still a little confusing since there are multiple steps, each with two substeps. It would be more like, "only one version of each step is needed," but the substeps make that clear.
<issue_comment>username_1: Sure, let's just drop this.