<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The influence of environment-based autonomous mobility on the evolution of cooperation."
Abstract:"Migration is an important feature of natural society. In real life, people will judge whether to migrate according to their satisfaction with the environment. This paper assumes that for a defector, when the number of cooperators in his neighbor fails to meet his expectation, he will choose to migrate, and for a cooperator, when the number of defectors in his neighbor exceeds his tolerance, he will choose to migrate. Results show that when the defectors have high requirements on the environment and are easy to move, if the cooperators have no requirements on the environment and do not move, for any population density, the system will eventually be all cooperators; if the cooperators choose to migrate when their neighbors are full of defectors, the system will eventually be all cooperators at the low population density, and with the increase of population density, the proportion of cooperation will decrease, showing a state of coexistence of cooperation and defection. However, when the defectors have no requirements on the environment and do not move, the cooperators have high requirements on the environment that move as long as there are defectors in their neighbors, for all population densities, cooperation and defection always coexist in the system, and there exists a population density, which maximizes the proportion of cooperation. That is to say, when cooperators and defectors one have high environmental requirements and the other have low requirements, it is conducive to cooperation.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
The influence of environment-based autonomous mobility on the evolution of cooperation
Migration is an important feature of natural society. In real life, people will judge whether to migrate according to their satisfaction with the environment. This paper assumes that for a defector, when the number of cooperators in his neighbor fails to meet his expectation, he will choose to migrate, and for a cooperator, when the number of defectors in his neighbor exceeds his tolerance, he will choose to migrate. Results show that when the defectors have high requirements on the environment and are easy to move, if the cooperators have no requirements on the environment and do not move, for any population density, the system will eventually be all cooperators; if the cooperators choose to migrate when their neighbors are full of defectors, the system will eventually be all cooperators at the low population density, and with the increase of population density, the proportion of cooperation will decrease, showing a state of coexistence of cooperation and defection. However, when the defectors have no requirements on the environment and do not move, the cooperators have high requirements on the environment that move as long as there are defectors in their neighbors, for all population densities, cooperation and defection always coexist in the system, and there exists a population density, which maximizes the proportion of cooperation. That is to say, when cooperators and defectors one have high environmental requirements and the other have low requirements, it is conducive to cooperation.