<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Navigating conflicting normative orders: when violence isn't violence."
Abstract:"This paper presents our case study on the child's right to be protected from all forms of violence in the Sahrawi refugee camps, near Tindouf, Algeria. After presenting our general findings and the different applicable social (legal and non-legal) norms, we argue that this study shows a new way to navigate conflicting norms of different normative orders. Namely: instead of choosing between conflicting norms/orders, Sahrawi adults reinterpret key concepts of norms, so that the different applicable norms can be aligned. In this case, they redefined the concepts of childhood and violence, so that it can be argued that the international legal right of their children to be protected from violence is fully complied with, while they are also aware of, and discuss, frequent fighting between children, as well as physical punishment (beating) of children by adult family members and teachers. The paper argues that this paradoxical position can be understood as an example of what Sartre calls mauvaise foi. In this case, the hiding of the factual self happens on the individual level, as well as on the collective level (the collective self of the Sahrawi people: our people do not use violence against children).."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Navigating conflicting normative orders: when violence isn't violence
This paper presents our case study on the child's right to be protected from all forms of violence in the Sahrawi refugee camps, near Tindouf, Algeria. After presenting our general findings and the different applicable social (legal and non-legal) norms, we argue that this study shows a new way to navigate conflicting norms of different normative orders. Namely: instead of choosing between conflicting norms/orders, Sahrawi adults reinterpret key concepts of norms, so that the different applicable norms can be aligned. In this case, they redefined the concepts of childhood and violence, so that it can be argued that the international legal right of their children to be protected from violence is fully complied with, while they are also aware of, and discuss, frequent fighting between children, as well as physical punishment (beating) of children by adult family members and teachers. The paper argues that this paradoxical position can be understood as an example of what Sartre calls mauvaise foi. In this case, the hiding of the factual self happens on the individual level, as well as on the collective level (the collective self of the Sahrawi people: our people do not use violence against children).