<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"POI recommendation with queuing time and user interest awareness."
Abstract:"Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation is a challenging problem due to different contextual information and a wide variety of human mobility patterns. Prior studies focus on recommendation that considers user travel spatiotemporal and sequential patterns behaviours. These studies do not pay attention to user personal interests, which is a significant factor for POI recommendation. Besides user interests, queuing time also plays a significant role in affecting user mobility behaviour, e.g., having to queue a long time to enter a POI might reduce visitor's enjoyment. Recently, attention-based recurrent neural networks-based approaches show promising performance in the next POI recommendation task. However, they are limited to single head attention, which can have difficulty in finding the appropriate user mobility behaviours considering complex relationships among POI spatial distances, POI check-in time, user interests and POI queuing times. In this research work, we are the first to consider queuing time and user interest awareness factors for next POI recommendation. We demonstrate how it is non-trivial to recommend a next POI and simultaneously predict its queuing time. To solve this problem, we propose a multi-task, multi-head attention transformer model called TLR-M_UI. The model recommends the next POIs to the target users and predicts queuing time to access the POIs simultaneously by considering user mobility behaviours. The proposed model utilises POIs description-based user personal interest that can also solve the new categorical POI cold start problem. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets show that the proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art baseline approaches in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score evaluation metrics. The model also predicts and minimizes the queuing time. For the reproducibility of the proposed model, we have publicly shared our implementation code at GitHub (https://github.com/sajalhalder/TLR-M_UI).."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
POI recommendation with queuing time and user interest awareness
Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation is a challenging problem due to different contextual information and a wide variety of human mobility patterns. Prior studies focus on recommendation that considers user travel spatiotemporal and sequential patterns behaviours. These studies do not pay attention to user personal interests, which is a significant factor for POI recommendation. Besides user interests, queuing time also plays a significant role in affecting user mobility behaviour, e.g., having to queue a long time to enter a POI might reduce visitor's enjoyment. Recently, attention-based recurrent neural networks-based approaches show promising performance in the next POI recommendation task. However, they are limited to single head attention, which can have difficulty in finding the appropriate user mobility behaviours considering complex relationships among POI spatial distances, POI check-in time, user interests and POI queuing times. In this research work, we are the first to consider queuing time and user interest awareness factors for next POI recommendation. We demonstrate how it is non-trivial to recommend a next POI and simultaneously predict its queuing time. To solve this problem, we propose a multi-task, multi-head attention transformer model called TLR-M_UI. The model recommends the next POIs to the target users and predicts queuing time to access the POIs simultaneously by considering user mobility behaviours. The proposed model utilises POIs description-based user personal interest that can also solve the new categorical POI cold start problem. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets show that the proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art baseline approaches in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score evaluation metrics. The model also predicts and minimizes the queuing time. For the reproducibility of the proposed model, we have publicly shared our implementation code at GitHub (https://github.com/sajalhalder/TLR-M_UI).