<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"French or Quebecois? How Speaker Accents Shape Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Attitudes Among Francophones in Montreal."
Abstract:"Public Significance Statement This study reveals accent biases and stereotypes from and toward Quebecois and French people in Montreal. These biases are as follows: an unconscious preference of French people for their own accent; a perception of French people as less friendly (by both French and Quebecois participants); and the perception of Quebecois people as slightly less competent (especially by Quebecois themselves). These attitudes were influenced by accent familiarity, prestige, and moral norms, shedding new light on the context of French immigration and cultural relationships in Montreal. The perception of accented speech creates a number of biases, but experimental evidence about their nature and the factors at play in these processes is scarce. The present study focused on francophone populations in Montreal, assessing implicit and explicit accent-based attitudes between Quebecois (French Canadian) and European French groups. Twenty-seven Quebecois and 31 French participants were administered a modified Implicit Association Test using Quebecois- and French-accented speech samples and Stereotype Content questionnaires about the perceived warmth and competence of each group. For the implicit measure, French participants showed a significant in-group bias, whereas Quebecois participants did not show any preference for either group. In contrast, explicit attitudes were mostly congruent: Quebecois people were rated as slightly more warm than competent, whereas French people were rated much less warm than competent by all participants. No correlation was found between implicit and explicit measures. The asymmetry in implicit biases was explained by accent exposure, Quebecois people being more familiar with the French accent than French people are with the Quebecois accent. Explicit attitudes were partly explained by prestige differences between the two accents but could also have been influenced by moral beliefs held by the French participants as recent immigrants in Quebec. These results emphasize that implicit and explicit biases driven by speaker accents arise from distinct but interrelated mechanisms, involving both global and local situational factors. Our findings have implications for understanding the dynamics of intergroup relationships in Montreal and many other settings where regional accent mixing is the norm.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
French or Quebecois? How Speaker Accents Shape Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Attitudes Among Francophones in Montreal
Public Significance Statement This study reveals accent biases and stereotypes from and toward Quebecois and French people in Montreal. These biases are as follows: an unconscious preference of French people for their own accent; a perception of French people as less friendly (by both French and Quebecois participants); and the perception of Quebecois people as slightly less competent (especially by Quebecois themselves). These attitudes were influenced by accent familiarity, prestige, and moral norms, shedding new light on the context of French immigration and cultural relationships in Montreal. The perception of accented speech creates a number of biases, but experimental evidence about their nature and the factors at play in these processes is scarce. The present study focused on francophone populations in Montreal, assessing implicit and explicit accent-based attitudes between Quebecois (French Canadian) and European French groups. Twenty-seven Quebecois and 31 French participants were administered a modified Implicit Association Test using Quebecois- and French-accented speech samples and Stereotype Content questionnaires about the perceived warmth and competence of each group. For the implicit measure, French participants showed a significant in-group bias, whereas Quebecois participants did not show any preference for either group. In contrast, explicit attitudes were mostly congruent: Quebecois people were rated as slightly more warm than competent, whereas French people were rated much less warm than competent by all participants. No correlation was found between implicit and explicit measures. The asymmetry in implicit biases was explained by accent exposure, Quebecois people being more familiar with the French accent than French people are with the Quebecois accent. Explicit attitudes were partly explained by prestige differences between the two accents but could also have been influenced by moral beliefs held by the French participants as recent immigrants in Quebec. These results emphasize that implicit and explicit biases driven by speaker accents arise from distinct but interrelated mechanisms, involving both global and local situational factors. Our findings have implications for understanding the dynamics of intergroup relationships in Montreal and many other settings where regional accent mixing is the norm.