<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Ethnographic evidence versus theoretical models: reminiscences and reflections on a linear proletarianisation model for Southern Africa."
Abstract:"Conceptualising what was seen as the proletarianisation of Southern Africa's working people was a significant analytical preoccupation of the social sciences in the 1970s. Considering that the region's political economy was dependent on migrant labour, anthropologists and others sought to understand the relationship between labour-sending and wage labour-utilising facets of what was described as the regional social formation. On the coat-tails of abstract neo-Marxist theory, debate hinged around whether the relationship was constituted by an articulation of modes of production or was characterised as a single capitalist mode; whether the working population constituted diverse classes (or class fractions) or a single proletariat, albeit fractured by people's multifold life experiences. Based on the author's reminiscences, the article records how 1970s ethnographic analyses revealed the inappropriateness, at one level, of a teleological model of proletarianisation - a point also demonstrated by subsequent ethnographers of the region. Yet, as the article argues, at another, global level, contemporary experiences of precarity and marginality reveal how capitalism continually produces a linear but bifurcating process that alienates working-struggling people from the means of production and social reproduction.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [3];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Ethnographic evidence versus theoretical models: reminiscences and reflections on a linear proletarianisation model for Southern Africa
Conceptualising what was seen as the proletarianisation of Southern Africa's working people was a significant analytical preoccupation of the social sciences in the 1970s. Considering that the region's political economy was dependent on migrant labour, anthropologists and others sought to understand the relationship between labour-sending and wage labour-utilising facets of what was described as the regional social formation. On the coat-tails of abstract neo-Marxist theory, debate hinged around whether the relationship was constituted by an articulation of modes of production or was characterised as a single capitalist mode; whether the working population constituted diverse classes (or class fractions) or a single proletariat, albeit fractured by people's multifold life experiences. Based on the author's reminiscences, the article records how 1970s ethnographic analyses revealed the inappropriateness, at one level, of a teleological model of proletarianisation - a point also demonstrated by subsequent ethnographers of the region. Yet, as the article argues, at another, global level, contemporary experiences of precarity and marginality reveal how capitalism continually produces a linear but bifurcating process that alienates working-struggling people from the means of production and social reproduction.