<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Human Migration, Protected Areas, and Conservation Outreach in Tanzania."
Abstract:"A recent discussion debates the extent of human in-migration around protected areas (PAs) in the tropics. One proposed argument is that rural migrants move to bordering areas to access conservation outreach benefits. A counter proposal maintains that PAs have largely negative effects on local populations and that outreach initiatives even if successful present insufficient benefits to drive in-migration. Using data from Tanzania, we examined merits of statistical tests and spatial methods used previously to evaluate migration near PAs and applied hierarchical modeling with appropriate controls for demographic and geographic factors to advance the debate. Areas bordering national parks in Tanzania did not have elevated rates of in-migration. Low baseline population density and high vegetation productivity with low interannual variation rather than conservation outreach explained observed migration patterns. More generally we argue that to produce results of conservation policy significance, analyses must be conducted at appropriate scales, and we caution against use of demographic data without appropriate controls when drawing conclusions about migration dynamics. La Migracion Humana, areas Protegidas y el Alcance de la Conservacion en Tanzania Resumen Una discusion reciente debate la extension de la inmigracion humana en areas protegidas en los tropicos. Un argumento propuesto es que los migrantes rurales se mudan a areas fronterizas para acceder a los beneficios del alcance de la conservacion. Una contrapropuesta mantiene que las areas protegidas tienen un efecto negativo mayor sobre las poblaciones locales y que las iniciativas de alcance, aunque sean exitosas, presentan beneficios insuficientes para conducir la inmigracion. Usando datos de Tanzania, examinamos los meritos de pruebas estadisticas y metodos espaciales usados previamente para evaluar la migracion cerca de areas protegidas y aplicamos un modelo jerarquico con controles apropiados para los factores demograficos y geograficos para avanzar el debate. Las areas fronterizas en los parques nacionales en Tanzania no tuvieron tasas elevadas de inmigracion. La baja densidad de poblacion base y la alta productividad de vegetacion con variacion interanual baja mas que explicar el alcance de la conservacion, explicaron los patrones de migracion. Mas generalizado, discutimos que para producir resultados significativos de politica de conservacion, los analisis se deben hacer en escalas apropiadas y advertimos sobre el uso de datos demograficos sin un control apropiado al concluir sobre las dinamicas de migracion.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [2,3];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [15];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
Human Migration, Protected Areas, and Conservation Outreach in Tanzania
A recent discussion debates the extent of human in-migration around protected areas (PAs) in the tropics. One proposed argument is that rural migrants move to bordering areas to access conservation outreach benefits. A counter proposal maintains that PAs have largely negative effects on local populations and that outreach initiatives even if successful present insufficient benefits to drive in-migration. Using data from Tanzania, we examined merits of statistical tests and spatial methods used previously to evaluate migration near PAs and applied hierarchical modeling with appropriate controls for demographic and geographic factors to advance the debate. Areas bordering national parks in Tanzania did not have elevated rates of in-migration. Low baseline population density and high vegetation productivity with low interannual variation rather than conservation outreach explained observed migration patterns. More generally we argue that to produce results of conservation policy significance, analyses must be conducted at appropriate scales, and we caution against use of demographic data without appropriate controls when drawing conclusions about migration dynamics. La Migracion Humana, areas Protegidas y el Alcance de la Conservacion en Tanzania Resumen Una discusion reciente debate la extension de la inmigracion humana en areas protegidas en los tropicos. Un argumento propuesto es que los migrantes rurales se mudan a areas fronterizas para acceder a los beneficios del alcance de la conservacion. Una contrapropuesta mantiene que las areas protegidas tienen un efecto negativo mayor sobre las poblaciones locales y que las iniciativas de alcance, aunque sean exitosas, presentan beneficios insuficientes para conducir la inmigracion. Usando datos de Tanzania, examinamos los meritos de pruebas estadisticas y metodos espaciales usados previamente para evaluar la migracion cerca de areas protegidas y aplicamos un modelo jerarquico con controles apropiados para los factores demograficos y geograficos para avanzar el debate. Las areas fronterizas en los parques nacionales en Tanzania no tuvieron tasas elevadas de inmigracion. La baja densidad de poblacion base y la alta productividad de vegetacion con variacion interanual baja mas que explicar el alcance de la conservacion, explicaron los patrones de migracion. Mas generalizado, discutimos que para producir resultados significativos de politica de conservacion, los analisis se deben hacer en escalas apropiadas y advertimos sobre el uso de datos demograficos sin un control apropiado al concluir sobre las dinamicas de migracion.