<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Surreptitious ethnography: Following the paths of Angolan refugees and returnees in the Angola-Zambia borderlands."
Abstract:"Between 2012 and 2014, the study of Angolan refugees and returnees led me to conduct fieldwork in the Meheba Refugee Camp (Zambia) and along both sides of the border between Angola and Zambia. In the eyes of the involved authorities, however, not only was the moment not appropriate, the issues under analysis were not welcome either. The bureaucratic and institutional obstacles I found during fieldwork eventually led me towards more pragmatic strategies, sometimes challenging the common principles of anthropological methodology and ethics. Without any institutional support, being 'on the move', following the paths of my interlocutors or simply guided by their contacts, became not only the way to venture into their lives and understand their social and cultural reality, but turned out to be a tactic to preclude multi-sided control. In this article I will examine fieldwork challenges but also the kind of information gathered while conducting a surreptitious ethnography.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Surreptitious ethnography: Following the paths of Angolan refugees and returnees in the Angola-Zambia borderlands
Between 2012 and 2014, the study of Angolan refugees and returnees led me to conduct fieldwork in the Meheba Refugee Camp (Zambia) and along both sides of the border between Angola and Zambia. In the eyes of the involved authorities, however, not only was the moment not appropriate, the issues under analysis were not welcome either. The bureaucratic and institutional obstacles I found during fieldwork eventually led me towards more pragmatic strategies, sometimes challenging the common principles of anthropological methodology and ethics. Without any institutional support, being 'on the move', following the paths of my interlocutors or simply guided by their contacts, became not only the way to venture into their lives and understand their social and cultural reality, but turned out to be a tactic to preclude multi-sided control. In this article I will examine fieldwork challenges but also the kind of information gathered while conducting a surreptitious ethnography.