<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Lessons from Supervisory Mechanisms in International and Regional Law."
Abstract:"Following on from the first working paper, this paper looks to supervisory mechanisms in regional and international law outside the refugee context for lessons on filling the gaps identified in the supervision of the Refugee Convention. In order to do so, it examines international and regional treaty supervisory mechanisms, particularly those related to human rights treaties, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses against the criteria identified in the first working paper. These mechanisms are divided into two categories: 'Supervision by Authoritative Guidance' and 'Supervision by Particularized Assessment of Compliance'. The first includes general comments, advisory opinions and preliminary rulings of regional and international courts, the special procedures of UNHCHR and CISG Advisory Council guidance. The second includes adjudication by international and regional courts, inter-state and individual complaints to treaty bodies, ad hoc adjudication, state reporting, the special procedures of UNHCHR and Justice Rapid Response. In assessing this range of general supervisory mechanisms, with a particular focus on the existing gaps in supervision, this paper aims to lay the groundwork for the third working paper to assess these mechanisms in the context of the international refugee protection regime.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Lessons from Supervisory Mechanisms in International and Regional Law
Following on from the first working paper, this paper looks to supervisory mechanisms in regional and international law outside the refugee context for lessons on filling the gaps identified in the supervision of the Refugee Convention. In order to do so, it examines international and regional treaty supervisory mechanisms, particularly those related to human rights treaties, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses against the criteria identified in the first working paper. These mechanisms are divided into two categories: 'Supervision by Authoritative Guidance' and 'Supervision by Particularized Assessment of Compliance'. The first includes general comments, advisory opinions and preliminary rulings of regional and international courts, the special procedures of UNHCHR and CISG Advisory Council guidance. The second includes adjudication by international and regional courts, inter-state and individual complaints to treaty bodies, ad hoc adjudication, state reporting, the special procedures of UNHCHR and Justice Rapid Response. In assessing this range of general supervisory mechanisms, with a particular focus on the existing gaps in supervision, this paper aims to lay the groundwork for the third working paper to assess these mechanisms in the context of the international refugee protection regime.