<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Detention of Migrants and Asylum-Seekers: The Challenge for Humanitarian Actors."
Abstract:"The systematic detention of migrants and asylum-seekers is increasingly used as a tool to restrict the influx of migrants and refugees, affecting hundreds of thousands of migrants in host and transit countries. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) has worked in immigration detention settings and has exposed the detrimental impact of detention on migrants' health. This work has also led to a series of ethical challenges related to working within an incarceration system that inherently limits efforts to alleviate suffering. The dilemmas faced by aid workers include issues of independent action, access, acceptance, and responsiveness to beneficiary needs. First, unrestricted access is impossible in prison-like facilities where daily operations are dependent on state consent. Secondly, when access is granted, MSF teams risk being perceived as part of the detention system, or at least seeming to collaborate with and accept it. Thirdly, the relevance and effectiveness of intervention is limited when the intervention setting is inherent to the suffering that humanitarian action seeks to alleviate. Such issues raise the question of when MSF's ethic of refusal should apply, as well as illustrating the sacrifices aid agencies have to make in difficult and restrictive conditions.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Detention of Migrants and Asylum-Seekers: The Challenge for Humanitarian Actors
The systematic detention of migrants and asylum-seekers is increasingly used as a tool to restrict the influx of migrants and refugees, affecting hundreds of thousands of migrants in host and transit countries. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) has worked in immigration detention settings and has exposed the detrimental impact of detention on migrants' health. This work has also led to a series of ethical challenges related to working within an incarceration system that inherently limits efforts to alleviate suffering. The dilemmas faced by aid workers include issues of independent action, access, acceptance, and responsiveness to beneficiary needs. First, unrestricted access is impossible in prison-like facilities where daily operations are dependent on state consent. Secondly, when access is granted, MSF teams risk being perceived as part of the detention system, or at least seeming to collaborate with and accept it. Thirdly, the relevance and effectiveness of intervention is limited when the intervention setting is inherent to the suffering that humanitarian action seeks to alleviate. Such issues raise the question of when MSF's ethic of refusal should apply, as well as illustrating the sacrifices aid agencies have to make in difficult and restrictive conditions.