<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Participatory Evaluation in an Integration Project with Unaccompanied Migrant Youth. A Commitment to Social Transformation."
Abstract:"This article presents the results of a participatory evaluative research in the framework of the AVENIR project aimed at developing a comprehensive and inclusive approach between France and Catalonia to improve access to employment and integration of young unaccompanied mi-grant minors. Our analysis, focusing on the part of the project carried out in Catalonia, elu-cidates the potential of participatory evaluation as a tool for change and emancipation. This methodological position interweaves evaluative research with the guidance and accompaniment of the agents involved, considering their concerns and positions. The analysis of the results is di-vided according to the different phases of evaluation showing the relevance of maintaining a permanent dialogue with the agents that allows not only to encourage their involvement in the project, but also to reorient the process towards its goal: the integration of young people in the territory.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6,7];
Q3 = [2];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Participatory Evaluation in an Integration Project with Unaccompanied Migrant Youth. A Commitment to Social Transformation
This article presents the results of a participatory evaluative research in the framework of the AVENIR project aimed at developing a comprehensive and inclusive approach between France and Catalonia to improve access to employment and integration of young unaccompanied mi-grant minors. Our analysis, focusing on the part of the project carried out in Catalonia, elu-cidates the potential of participatory evaluation as a tool for change and emancipation. This methodological position interweaves evaluative research with the guidance and accompaniment of the agents involved, considering their concerns and positions. The analysis of the results is di-vided according to the different phases of evaluation showing the relevance of maintaining a permanent dialogue with the agents that allows not only to encourage their involvement in the project, but also to reorient the process towards its goal: the integration of young people in the territory.