<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Design issues for a big city immunization registry."
Abstract:"New York is the nation's largest city with a birth cohort of more than 130,000 and nearly 2 million children aged 18 years and under. Its sheer size has important implications for registry design, as do the poverty, cultural diversity, and mobility of the population, as well as large numbers of special groups, such as homeless people and recent immigrants. The size and diversity of the provider population also have consequences for immunization registry planning. The private sector is heavily represented-about 55% of the immunizations are given by physicians in private practice, voluntary hospitals, and private clinics. Public and private providers practice in a variety of settings and span all levels of technologic sophistication. This article addresses the ways in which New York City's technical registry design and implementation plan have responded to local requirements and constraints. Topics covered include decisions about roles and responsibilities of central registry reporting and retrieving information, child identifiers collected and match strategies, and policy decisions about security and confidentiality. It is instructive to examine the process and rationale for New York City's design decisions, as well as the decisions themselves. Some of the decisions may in fact be generalizable to other large systems; some of the rejected alternatives may be appropriate under a different set of constraints. The entire decision process demonstrates how a group of planners took a general concept (an immunization registry) and modified it in the course of bringing it to the threshold of implementation, in the summer of 1996.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Design issues for a big city immunization registry
New York is the nation's largest city with a birth cohort of more than 130,000 and nearly 2 million children aged 18 years and under. Its sheer size has important implications for registry design, as do the poverty, cultural diversity, and mobility of the population, as well as large numbers of special groups, such as homeless people and recent immigrants. The size and diversity of the provider population also have consequences for immunization registry planning. The private sector is heavily represented-about 55% of the immunizations are given by physicians in private practice, voluntary hospitals, and private clinics. Public and private providers practice in a variety of settings and span all levels of technologic sophistication. This article addresses the ways in which New York City's technical registry design and implementation plan have responded to local requirements and constraints. Topics covered include decisions about roles and responsibilities of central registry reporting and retrieving information, child identifiers collected and match strategies, and policy decisions about security and confidentiality. It is instructive to examine the process and rationale for New York City's design decisions, as well as the decisions themselves. Some of the decisions may in fact be generalizable to other large systems; some of the rejected alternatives may be appropriate under a different set of constraints. The entire decision process demonstrates how a group of planners took a general concept (an immunization registry) and modified it in the course of bringing it to the threshold of implementation, in the summer of 1996.