<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Characteristics and scope of humanitarian relief forensic medical evaluations for immigrant children in the US."
Abstract:"According to US Customs and Border Protection, over 473,000 family units and 76,000 unaccompanied children were apprehended in 2019, a multi-fold increase from previous years. Thus, the number of children who may be eligible for humanitarian relief has increased significantly. For those claiming humanitarian relief, forensic medical evaluations performed by health professionals can provide critical evidence to bolster claims. In this cross-sectional, nationwide survey-in which we sought to characterize specialties, forensic training, capacity, and scope of humanitarian relief evaluations for immigrant children under eighteen-years-old-only 28 providers, half of whom were Child Abuse Pediatricians, reported performing humanitarian relief evaluations. The most common reported type of humanitarian relief evaluation conducted was for asylum. We found that the current training for forensic medical evaluations for humanitarian relief in pediatrics is likely varied not welldefined, and not pediatric-specific. In order to protect the rights of children who are eligible for humanitarian relief, pediatric and family medicine forensic medical evaluation training standards and curricula need to be developed; validated humanitarian relief screening tools need to be tested and utilized; and residents and attending physicians, including specialists with expertise in forensic evaluations, need to be actively recruited to perform these evaluations in collaboration with legal aid organizations.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5,6,7];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Characteristics and scope of humanitarian relief forensic medical evaluations for immigrant children in the US
According to US Customs and Border Protection, over 473,000 family units and 76,000 unaccompanied children were apprehended in 2019, a multi-fold increase from previous years. Thus, the number of children who may be eligible for humanitarian relief has increased significantly. For those claiming humanitarian relief, forensic medical evaluations performed by health professionals can provide critical evidence to bolster claims. In this cross-sectional, nationwide survey-in which we sought to characterize specialties, forensic training, capacity, and scope of humanitarian relief evaluations for immigrant children under eighteen-years-old-only 28 providers, half of whom were Child Abuse Pediatricians, reported performing humanitarian relief evaluations. The most common reported type of humanitarian relief evaluation conducted was for asylum. We found that the current training for forensic medical evaluations for humanitarian relief in pediatrics is likely varied not welldefined, and not pediatric-specific. In order to protect the rights of children who are eligible for humanitarian relief, pediatric and family medicine forensic medical evaluation training standards and curricula need to be developed; validated humanitarian relief screening tools need to be tested and utilized; and residents and attending physicians, including specialists with expertise in forensic evaluations, need to be actively recruited to perform these evaluations in collaboration with legal aid organizations.