<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS VS THE PUBLIC-HEALTH - THE PROBLEM OF THE ASIAN HEPATITIS-B CARRIERS IN AMERICA."
Abstract:"The influx of Asians into the United States (both as refugees and immigrants) presented American public health authorities with a significant challenge: because many of them were chronic hepatitis B carriers. The carriers posed a real, but undetermined level of risk of spreading the infection to the larger community. Of especial importance was the danger that susceptible children would be infected in day-care centers, because the earlier the age of exposure, the greater the risk of developing chronic carriership; which in turn is associated with cirrhosis and cancer of the live- in later life. The Asian carriers presented both a health problem, and a moral dilemma. If the carrier situation became a subject of public debate, there was danger of a racist and discriminatory reaction to the newcomers. Faced with this problem, American public health authorities opted to protect the Asian carriers by assuring the medical profession and concerned members of the public that there was either no health risk. or the risk was easily controllable, despite the lack of evidence to support such positions In their attempt to protect a vulnerable group from discrimination, they functioned as humanitarians, but abrogated their duty as scientists and thereby undermined the long-term credibility of those charged with protecting the public health. Thus, despite achieving some immediate benefits for a defenceless group. the price they paid for that protection was too high.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS VS THE PUBLIC-HEALTH - THE PROBLEM OF THE ASIAN HEPATITIS-B CARRIERS IN AMERICA
The influx of Asians into the United States (both as refugees and immigrants) presented American public health authorities with a significant challenge: because many of them were chronic hepatitis B carriers. The carriers posed a real, but undetermined level of risk of spreading the infection to the larger community. Of especial importance was the danger that susceptible children would be infected in day-care centers, because the earlier the age of exposure, the greater the risk of developing chronic carriership; which in turn is associated with cirrhosis and cancer of the live- in later life. The Asian carriers presented both a health problem, and a moral dilemma. If the carrier situation became a subject of public debate, there was danger of a racist and discriminatory reaction to the newcomers. Faced with this problem, American public health authorities opted to protect the Asian carriers by assuring the medical profession and concerned members of the public that there was either no health risk. or the risk was easily controllable, despite the lack of evidence to support such positions In their attempt to protect a vulnerable group from discrimination, they functioned as humanitarians, but abrogated their duty as scientists and thereby undermined the long-term credibility of those charged with protecting the public health. Thus, despite achieving some immediate benefits for a defenceless group. the price they paid for that protection was too high.