<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"SOCIOECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF LAND DEGRADATION AND RURAL POVERTY IN NORTHEAST THAILAND."
Abstract:"The discussion above illustrates the inadequacy of many of the development strategies that have been pursued in Northeast Thailand. The prevailing social, political, and economic, policies and trends have resulted in the transformation of the people of the Northeast from a relatively self-sustaining population to an increasingly impoverished one. In the course of the movement away from relatively self-sufficient subsistence-oriented production, they have been exposed to both the 'rigours of the market' and changing policies regarding access to markets, cash-crops, and land tenure - with all of their destabilizing, and in this case impoverishing, effects. This transformation has resulted in increased land degradation and rural poverty in the Northeast. Threatened by the potential political and social repercussions of these changes, development authorities have tried to respond by exploring different institutional and implementation strategies. These included infrastructure investments based on models derived from other regions, as well as Land settlement, village cooperatives, and other micro-level projects. The failure of these approaches to alleviate rural poverty in the Northeast prompted more 'participatory' and 'bottom-up' development strategies (e.g, in the form of the 'equity model'). However, these attempts as well have run into difficulties, with explanations centring around the lack of coordination among different development agencies, lack of training, and related problems. Such explanations focus on technical issues that presumably could be overcome with more coordination, information, and technically-skilled people. The question is: can an improvement in the method of implementation of these projects, actually alleviate the problems of poverty and land-degradation in the rural Northeast? This study indicates that the real problem lies more in the failure to confront the reasons why these policies have been designed and implemented in the ways that they have been to date - including problems associated with the development 'paradigm' which is being used - as well as the failure to confront the actual circumstances and requirements of the local people involved. It is critically important to recognize the underlying forces that have resulted in resource poverty, migration, land hunger, and land insecurity, and to recognize and castigate the policies that themselves result in land degradation. Until the underlying causes are recognized, and pressure is exerted to bring about change, rural development projects, no matter how well-meaning, are likely to differ primarily in the degree to which they fail to alleviate, or in fact even contribute to, rural poverty and environmental degradation in the region.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [3];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
SOCIOECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF LAND DEGRADATION AND RURAL POVERTY IN NORTHEAST THAILAND
The discussion above illustrates the inadequacy of many of the development strategies that have been pursued in Northeast Thailand. The prevailing social, political, and economic, policies and trends have resulted in the transformation of the people of the Northeast from a relatively self-sustaining population to an increasingly impoverished one. In the course of the movement away from relatively self-sufficient subsistence-oriented production, they have been exposed to both the 'rigours of the market' and changing policies regarding access to markets, cash-crops, and land tenure - with all of their destabilizing, and in this case impoverishing, effects. This transformation has resulted in increased land degradation and rural poverty in the Northeast. Threatened by the potential political and social repercussions of these changes, development authorities have tried to respond by exploring different institutional and implementation strategies. These included infrastructure investments based on models derived from other regions, as well as Land settlement, village cooperatives, and other micro-level projects. The failure of these approaches to alleviate rural poverty in the Northeast prompted more 'participatory' and 'bottom-up' development strategies (e.g, in the form of the 'equity model'). However, these attempts as well have run into difficulties, with explanations centring around the lack of coordination among different development agencies, lack of training, and related problems. Such explanations focus on technical issues that presumably could be overcome with more coordination, information, and technically-skilled people. The question is: can an improvement in the method of implementation of these projects, actually alleviate the problems of poverty and land-degradation in the rural Northeast? This study indicates that the real problem lies more in the failure to confront the reasons why these policies have been designed and implemented in the ways that they have been to date - including problems associated with the development 'paradigm' which is being used - as well as the failure to confront the actual circumstances and requirements of the local people involved. It is critically important to recognize the underlying forces that have resulted in resource poverty, migration, land hunger, and land insecurity, and to recognize and castigate the policies that themselves result in land degradation. Until the underlying causes are recognized, and pressure is exerted to bring about change, rural development projects, no matter how well-meaning, are likely to differ primarily in the degree to which they fail to alleviate, or in fact even contribute to, rural poverty and environmental degradation in the region.