<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Shadows in Paradise - Exploring Non-Refoulement as an Open Concept."
Abstract:"The principle of non-refoulement contains a paradox. While states have committed to respecting the principle by joining the 1951 Refugee Convention and key human rights conventions, its content is not established in international law. In other words, states have committed to a principle the content of which is indeterminate. Since no common definition exists, in practice, national and international bodies have extensive powers of discretion to give content to the terms 'persecution', 'torture', 'degrading' or 'cruel' treatment. The purpose of this article is to explore non-refoulement as an open and ambiguous concept. Acknowledgement of the indeterminacy is important, as open concepts never remain such in practice but are always issued with content or interpreted. This approach calls for a further question: how do interpretations come about and what kind of factors influence them? The conclusion of the article is that different national and international actors promote their own 'correct' interpretations of this keystone of refugee protection.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Shadows in Paradise - Exploring Non-Refoulement as an Open Concept
The principle of non-refoulement contains a paradox. While states have committed to respecting the principle by joining the 1951 Refugee Convention and key human rights conventions, its content is not established in international law. In other words, states have committed to a principle the content of which is indeterminate. Since no common definition exists, in practice, national and international bodies have extensive powers of discretion to give content to the terms 'persecution', 'torture', 'degrading' or 'cruel' treatment. The purpose of this article is to explore non-refoulement as an open and ambiguous concept. Acknowledgement of the indeterminacy is important, as open concepts never remain such in practice but are always issued with content or interpreted. This approach calls for a further question: how do interpretations come about and what kind of factors influence them? The conclusion of the article is that different national and international actors promote their own 'correct' interpretations of this keystone of refugee protection.