<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Civic spaces in rural new gateway communities."
Abstract:"Rural new gateway communities in the United States - those communities that have become destinations for growing numbers of immigrant and non-immigrant Latino/as and other new populations since the 1990s - face great challenges in their integration efforts. Traditional institutional mechanisms and spaces, like city hall, where people are encouraged to voice their concerns and interests do not provide equal opportunities for participation in liveability-related decisions for newly incorporated populations. Besides language barriers, the formal spaces and norms of communication dictated by America's legal system can be foreign to newcomers. Yet, improving liveability for all segments of the community hinges on inclusive governance. Knowing what places are used for community discussions, by whom, and why can inform and help develop more effective and inclusive institutional participatory practices and venue choices, and also lead to more effective community integration efforts. This article discusses findings from a study which sought to explore where different segments of a rural Iowa community undergoing demographic and sociocultural change go to discuss their needs and concerns, and to what degree these spaces facilitate individual and collective empowerment. The work we present extends the theoretical and urban-focused public space literature through a case study of a rural new gateway.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Civic spaces in rural new gateway communities
Rural new gateway communities in the United States - those communities that have become destinations for growing numbers of immigrant and non-immigrant Latino/as and other new populations since the 1990s - face great challenges in their integration efforts. Traditional institutional mechanisms and spaces, like city hall, where people are encouraged to voice their concerns and interests do not provide equal opportunities for participation in liveability-related decisions for newly incorporated populations. Besides language barriers, the formal spaces and norms of communication dictated by America's legal system can be foreign to newcomers. Yet, improving liveability for all segments of the community hinges on inclusive governance. Knowing what places are used for community discussions, by whom, and why can inform and help develop more effective and inclusive institutional participatory practices and venue choices, and also lead to more effective community integration efforts. This article discusses findings from a study which sought to explore where different segments of a rural Iowa community undergoing demographic and sociocultural change go to discuss their needs and concerns, and to what degree these spaces facilitate individual and collective empowerment. The work we present extends the theoretical and urban-focused public space literature through a case study of a rural new gateway.