<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The Politics of Protection: The Right to Food in Protracted Refugee Situations."
Abstract:"This article focuses on the politics of refugee protection, with attention given to issues of the right to food and food insecurity in two protracted refugee camps: Osire in Namibia and Nakivale in Uganda. In our analysis, we identify a key tension at the heart of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and its partners' understanding and practices of protection: between a minimalist understanding of human rights (the right to live or survive) and a more expansive one that guarantees the full and widest array of human rights, including socio-economic ones. This tension, when combined with dwindling state donor funding for humanitarian work, a market-driven system of refugee food provision, and restrictive encampment policies and practices, has dire consequences for refugees living in camps. We stress that the right to adequate and sustainable food is a core international protection issue for refugees that is often reduced to a matter of 'assistance' in both the scholarship and practices concerning refugee protection. We argue for a more expansive and critical understanding of the right to food and food security as this has greater implications for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and its protection mandate in the context of defining the responsibilities that governments and international organisations have towards refugees.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
The Politics of Protection: The Right to Food in Protracted Refugee Situations
This article focuses on the politics of refugee protection, with attention given to issues of the right to food and food insecurity in two protracted refugee camps: Osire in Namibia and Nakivale in Uganda. In our analysis, we identify a key tension at the heart of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and its partners' understanding and practices of protection: between a minimalist understanding of human rights (the right to live or survive) and a more expansive one that guarantees the full and widest array of human rights, including socio-economic ones. This tension, when combined with dwindling state donor funding for humanitarian work, a market-driven system of refugee food provision, and restrictive encampment policies and practices, has dire consequences for refugees living in camps. We stress that the right to adequate and sustainable food is a core international protection issue for refugees that is often reduced to a matter of 'assistance' in both the scholarship and practices concerning refugee protection. We argue for a more expansive and critical understanding of the right to food and food security as this has greater implications for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and its protection mandate in the context of defining the responsibilities that governments and international organisations have towards refugees.