<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"OBSTACLES ON THE ROAD TO PROTECTION: ASSESSING THE TREATMENT OF SEX-TRAFFICKING VICTIMS UNDER AUSTRALIA'S MIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW."
Abstract:"In recent years both the international community and the Australian Government have renewed efforts to address the problem of sex-trafficking. This reflects the growing recognition that effectively addressing the issue of trafficking requires more than a criminal law enforcement or immigration compliance approach; it also requires an acknowledgement of the human rights and protection needs of trafficking victims. From this perspective, the article critically examines Australia's response to the protection needs of persons trafficked to the country for the purposes of sexual enslavement in light of Australia's obligations under international law. The article first reviews recent amendments to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) which provide some respite from mandatory detention and deportation to victims of trafficking who are willing and able to assist in the prosecution of sex-traffickers. While in some respects a positive development, this analysis reveals serious deficiencies in the regime. The article then considers the manner in which Australia has offered protection to trafficking victims pursuant to its existing obligations under the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. The major part of the article is dedicated to an examination of the way in which Australian courts and tribunals have assessed refugee claims of trafficked women. While foreign jurisprudence and guidance from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees demonstrate that the Refugee Convention can clearly encompass trafficking-related claims, it will be argued that, in Australia, art 1A(2) continues to be interpreted and applied in a way that overlooks how gender intersects with social, cultural and economic norms to oppress women and subject them to discriminatory harm.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
OBSTACLES ON THE ROAD TO PROTECTION: ASSESSING THE TREATMENT OF SEX-TRAFFICKING VICTIMS UNDER AUSTRALIA'S MIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW
In recent years both the international community and the Australian Government have renewed efforts to address the problem of sex-trafficking. This reflects the growing recognition that effectively addressing the issue of trafficking requires more than a criminal law enforcement or immigration compliance approach; it also requires an acknowledgement of the human rights and protection needs of trafficking victims. From this perspective, the article critically examines Australia's response to the protection needs of persons trafficked to the country for the purposes of sexual enslavement in light of Australia's obligations under international law. The article first reviews recent amendments to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) which provide some respite from mandatory detention and deportation to victims of trafficking who are willing and able to assist in the prosecution of sex-traffickers. While in some respects a positive development, this analysis reveals serious deficiencies in the regime. The article then considers the manner in which Australia has offered protection to trafficking victims pursuant to its existing obligations under the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. The major part of the article is dedicated to an examination of the way in which Australian courts and tribunals have assessed refugee claims of trafficked women. While foreign jurisprudence and guidance from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees demonstrate that the Refugee Convention can clearly encompass trafficking-related claims, it will be argued that, in Australia, art 1A(2) continues to be interpreted and applied in a way that overlooks how gender intersects with social, cultural and economic norms to oppress women and subject them to discriminatory harm.