<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"From Discretion to Necessity: Third State Responsibility for Israel's Control of Stay and Entry into Palestinian Territory."
Abstract:"Since 1967, Israel has controlled freedom of movement, immigration, residency and nationality in the occupied Palestinian territory through the establishment and administration of the Palestinian population registry in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Over the years, the registry has been the basis for Israeli policies that have barred people from entering the territory or travelling within it, and trapped others inside, resulting in the separation of families and loss of employment and opportunities for obtaining an education abroad. Various non-governmental rights groups have documented Israel's control of Palestinian residency status and entry into Palestinian territory through arbitrary and draconian criteria, resulting in the exclusion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the territory. Their advocacy strategies have, however, brought about little or no impact on Israel's policy and practice. An alternative advocacy paradigm, that seeks to operationalize third state responsibility with regard to Israel's control of Palestinian residency and movement, has been identified by a Palestinian volunteer group, the 'Right to Enter' campaign. By invoking the state practice of the United States and European countries on the protection of their nationals abroad, the group has in several cases compelled such third party states to inquire, contest and seek satisfaction for apparent Israeli violations of the rights of their nationals. This article discusses Israel's violations of international human rights and humanitarian law resulting from its institutional practice on Palestinian residency and entry into Palestinian territory, and proposes an operational framework for invoking the rights and obligations of third party states to leverage Israel's internationally unlawful conduct and demand its compliance with international law.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
From Discretion to Necessity: Third State Responsibility for Israel's Control of Stay and Entry into Palestinian Territory
Since 1967, Israel has controlled freedom of movement, immigration, residency and nationality in the occupied Palestinian territory through the establishment and administration of the Palestinian population registry in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Over the years, the registry has been the basis for Israeli policies that have barred people from entering the territory or travelling within it, and trapped others inside, resulting in the separation of families and loss of employment and opportunities for obtaining an education abroad. Various non-governmental rights groups have documented Israel's control of Palestinian residency status and entry into Palestinian territory through arbitrary and draconian criteria, resulting in the exclusion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the territory. Their advocacy strategies have, however, brought about little or no impact on Israel's policy and practice. An alternative advocacy paradigm, that seeks to operationalize third state responsibility with regard to Israel's control of Palestinian residency and movement, has been identified by a Palestinian volunteer group, the 'Right to Enter' campaign. By invoking the state practice of the United States and European countries on the protection of their nationals abroad, the group has in several cases compelled such third party states to inquire, contest and seek satisfaction for apparent Israeli violations of the rights of their nationals. This article discusses Israel's violations of international human rights and humanitarian law resulting from its institutional practice on Palestinian residency and entry into Palestinian territory, and proposes an operational framework for invoking the rights and obligations of third party states to leverage Israel's internationally unlawful conduct and demand its compliance with international law.