<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Intergenerational status mobility in nineteenth-century Korea: Evidence of Seoul household registers from 1897 to 1906."
Abstract:"In this study, we examine intergenerational status mobility in nineteenth-century Korea by using population registers collected at the turn of the twentieth century. We trace a long-term mobility trend by using ancestral (to great-grandfathers) and household heads' status information in those registers. We find that both absolute and relative mobility certainly increased in the late nineteenth century when Korea encountered severe international and domestic challenges. This suggests that these challenges triggered fundamental changes in chances for status mobility. We also find diverging trends of social fluidity. Intergenerational inheritance among the commoners became weaker, increasing social fluidity at the bottom. At the same time, top elite people remained successful in preventing their offspring's downward mobility, thus strengthening social rigidity at the top. We interpret that the diverging mobility pattern was related to tremendous socioeconomic changes after the port opening in 1876. We compare our findings to those of Western countries and discuss the implications for understanding social mobility in the past.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6];
Q3 = [2];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
Intergenerational status mobility in nineteenth-century Korea: Evidence of Seoul household registers from 1897 to 1906
In this study, we examine intergenerational status mobility in nineteenth-century Korea by using population registers collected at the turn of the twentieth century. We trace a long-term mobility trend by using ancestral (to great-grandfathers) and household heads' status information in those registers. We find that both absolute and relative mobility certainly increased in the late nineteenth century when Korea encountered severe international and domestic challenges. This suggests that these challenges triggered fundamental changes in chances for status mobility. We also find diverging trends of social fluidity. Intergenerational inheritance among the commoners became weaker, increasing social fluidity at the bottom. At the same time, top elite people remained successful in preventing their offspring's downward mobility, thus strengthening social rigidity at the top. We interpret that the diverging mobility pattern was related to tremendous socioeconomic changes after the port opening in 1876. We compare our findings to those of Western countries and discuss the implications for understanding social mobility in the past.