<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Incidence of head and neck cancer among first-generation immigrants and their children in Finland."
Abstract:"IntroductionLimited data exist regarding head and neck cancer (HNC) burden among immigrants who may have distinct characteristics, and hence different incidence rates from the general population. Variations in behavioral habits, cultural lifestyle, or diet may cause variations across different subgroups.MethodsThe whole immigrant population of Finnish residents born abroad, and their children were retrieved for the years 1970-2017. First-generation immigrants are defined as individuals born abroad, excluding their children (even if born abroad). The study comprised 0.5 million first-generation immigrants and 0.3 million children, contributing to 6 million and 5 million person-years of follow-up, respectively. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) per 100,000 person-years at risk were calculated to quantify the risk of HNC among immigrants relative to the general Finnish population.ResultsThe overall risk of any HNC was not increased among first-generation male immigrants (SIR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88-1.15), but significantly elevated for cancer of the pharynx (SIR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.95), and larynx (SIR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.83) and decreased for lip (SIR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.67). The increased risk of pharyngeal cancer was highest among male immigrants from Asia Pacific (SIR 4.21, 95% CI: 2.02-7.75). First-generation immigrant women had a significantly reduced risk of any HNC (SIR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.55), which remained even after stratification by site. We observed no increased risk of any HNC among the children of first-generation immigrants.ConclusionHealthcare professionals need to recognize the groups at higher HNC risk. Efforts to address the main etiological risk factors, such as smoking, are needed among the selected immigrant populations, that haven't yet reached similar decreasing trends, as in for example smoking, as the main population.NOVELTY AND IMPACTCurrently, globally, over 280 million people live outside their country of birth. Limited data exist regarding head and neck cancer (HNC) burden among immigrants who may have distinct characteristics and hence different incidence rates from the general population. Immigrant studies can provide novel data by shedding light on risk alterations and the pace of acculturation of different populations.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
Incidence of head and neck cancer among first-generation immigrants and their children in Finland
IntroductionLimited data exist regarding head and neck cancer (HNC) burden among immigrants who may have distinct characteristics, and hence different incidence rates from the general population. Variations in behavioral habits, cultural lifestyle, or diet may cause variations across different subgroups.MethodsThe whole immigrant population of Finnish residents born abroad, and their children were retrieved for the years 1970-2017. First-generation immigrants are defined as individuals born abroad, excluding their children (even if born abroad). The study comprised 0.5 million first-generation immigrants and 0.3 million children, contributing to 6 million and 5 million person-years of follow-up, respectively. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) per 100,000 person-years at risk were calculated to quantify the risk of HNC among immigrants relative to the general Finnish population.ResultsThe overall risk of any HNC was not increased among first-generation male immigrants (SIR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88-1.15), but significantly elevated for cancer of the pharynx (SIR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.95), and larynx (SIR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.83) and decreased for lip (SIR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.67). The increased risk of pharyngeal cancer was highest among male immigrants from Asia Pacific (SIR 4.21, 95% CI: 2.02-7.75). First-generation immigrant women had a significantly reduced risk of any HNC (SIR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.55), which remained even after stratification by site. We observed no increased risk of any HNC among the children of first-generation immigrants.ConclusionHealthcare professionals need to recognize the groups at higher HNC risk. Efforts to address the main etiological risk factors, such as smoking, are needed among the selected immigrant populations, that haven't yet reached similar decreasing trends, as in for example smoking, as the main population.NOVELTY AND IMPACTCurrently, globally, over 280 million people live outside their country of birth. Limited data exist regarding head and neck cancer (HNC) burden among immigrants who may have distinct characteristics and hence different incidence rates from the general population. Immigrant studies can provide novel data by shedding light on risk alterations and the pace of acculturation of different populations.