<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The Anti-Politics of Inclusion Citizen Engagement with Newcomers in Norway."
Abstract:"This article examines volunteer engagement with newcomers in Norway following increased arrivals in 2015, through which locals wished to help the newly arrived settle into Nor-wegian society. I explore why some volunteers described these activities as 'apolitical', sometimes actively silencing topics connected to politics and religion. Volunteers' depoliticising tendencies represent an effort to promote social cohesion in the context of polarised immigration debates, of a vernacular inclination to fostering social cohesion by minimising differences, and of a longstand-ing cooperative relationship between Norwegian civil society and state. While regarded by some volunteers as apolitical, these activities matched authorities' encouragement of citizen engagement with newcomers' 'everyday integration' and reproduced state logics of integration, concerned with equipping newcomers with the linguistic, societal and cultural knowledge deemed necessary for their incorporation. By reproducing hierarchies between different types of newcomers, helpers and helped, and state ideas of difference, volunteers inadvertently produced an 'anti-politics of inclusion'.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
The Anti-Politics of Inclusion Citizen Engagement with Newcomers in Norway
This article examines volunteer engagement with newcomers in Norway following increased arrivals in 2015, through which locals wished to help the newly arrived settle into Nor-wegian society. I explore why some volunteers described these activities as 'apolitical', sometimes actively silencing topics connected to politics and religion. Volunteers' depoliticising tendencies represent an effort to promote social cohesion in the context of polarised immigration debates, of a vernacular inclination to fostering social cohesion by minimising differences, and of a longstand-ing cooperative relationship between Norwegian civil society and state. While regarded by some volunteers as apolitical, these activities matched authorities' encouragement of citizen engagement with newcomers' 'everyday integration' and reproduced state logics of integration, concerned with equipping newcomers with the linguistic, societal and cultural knowledge deemed necessary for their incorporation. By reproducing hierarchies between different types of newcomers, helpers and helped, and state ideas of difference, volunteers inadvertently produced an 'anti-politics of inclusion'.