<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Dehumanization Revisited Media Reports on the Refugee Crisis in British Online Newspapers."
Abstract:"Media reports have the power to change the opinions of the readership on any topic simply by repetitively using certain wording and structures. In certain cases, the reader may be prevented from forming an objective stance and unprejudiced perspective, which can prove dangerous if the topic in question is highly sensitive. Ever since the European refugee crisis in 2015, newspaper articles in the UK press have frequently used a range of dehumanizing language. This paper attempts to examine the issue by both quantitatively and qualitatively comparing the structures used to describe refugees, asylum seekers, migrants and immigrants in two consecutive years (2015 and 2016 respectively). Three British online newspapers were selected for this purpose: The Guardian, The Telegraph and The Independent. Through a combination of conceptual metaphor theory, critical discourse analysis (CDA) and corpus linguistics, this paper examines and analyzes the common collocations and metaphors used in media reports to refer to refugees at the outset of the crisis, and then again during the referendum year. The comparison between different periods is crucial, in that it can reveal whether expressions recur over time, especially because the media reports initially provided general information about the refugees such as their number and origins, but later also discussed the impact of the crisis on European countries. This analysis centres around the frequent use of dehumanizing language, which has not weakened over time, despite appeals from the UN Refugee Agency and numerous non-governmental organizations, who have sought to remind the press that words do matter in the migration debate. The findings show that dehumanization is recurrent and ubiquitous in this context, resulting in the reinforcement of inhumane media treatment of this vulnerable group.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
Dehumanization Revisited Media Reports on the Refugee Crisis in British Online Newspapers
Media reports have the power to change the opinions of the readership on any topic simply by repetitively using certain wording and structures. In certain cases, the reader may be prevented from forming an objective stance and unprejudiced perspective, which can prove dangerous if the topic in question is highly sensitive. Ever since the European refugee crisis in 2015, newspaper articles in the UK press have frequently used a range of dehumanizing language. This paper attempts to examine the issue by both quantitatively and qualitatively comparing the structures used to describe refugees, asylum seekers, migrants and immigrants in two consecutive years (2015 and 2016 respectively). Three British online newspapers were selected for this purpose: The Guardian, The Telegraph and The Independent. Through a combination of conceptual metaphor theory, critical discourse analysis (CDA) and corpus linguistics, this paper examines and analyzes the common collocations and metaphors used in media reports to refer to refugees at the outset of the crisis, and then again during the referendum year. The comparison between different periods is crucial, in that it can reveal whether expressions recur over time, especially because the media reports initially provided general information about the refugees such as their number and origins, but later also discussed the impact of the crisis on European countries. This analysis centres around the frequent use of dehumanizing language, which has not weakened over time, despite appeals from the UN Refugee Agency and numerous non-governmental organizations, who have sought to remind the press that words do matter in the migration debate. The findings show that dehumanization is recurrent and ubiquitous in this context, resulting in the reinforcement of inhumane media treatment of this vulnerable group.