<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Social precariousness, cancer and psychological vulnerability: directly or indirectly linked?."
Abstract:"The link between psychological vulnerability and cancer is not clearly established. However, there does appear to be a link between cancer and social marginality. Psychological fragility has been shown to be associated with tobacco addiction. Socially vulnerable people are at risk of undergoing screening less frequently and being treated less efficiently. These data could explain the deficit in terms of both monitoring of their pathologies and observed survival rates, compared with those relating to the general population. Such people do not refuse treatment or screening and are often well aware of screening methods and their usefulness, and wish to be treated if they are ill. The main problems relate to organisation and careprovision. Monitoring of such patients is not always possible and the notion of a life-plan is often nonexistent, thus preventing adequate management of the disease. Screening programs are not adapted for marginal and socially excluded populations. Solutions can be found but they depend on both social and health policies and the behaviour of every individual professional care-provider.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [0];
Q6 = [0].
Social precariousness, cancer and psychological vulnerability: directly or indirectly linked?
The link between psychological vulnerability and cancer is not clearly established. However, there does appear to be a link between cancer and social marginality. Psychological fragility has been shown to be associated with tobacco addiction. Socially vulnerable people are at risk of undergoing screening less frequently and being treated less efficiently. These data could explain the deficit in terms of both monitoring of their pathologies and observed survival rates, compared with those relating to the general population. Such people do not refuse treatment or screening and are often well aware of screening methods and their usefulness, and wish to be treated if they are ill. The main problems relate to organisation and careprovision. Monitoring of such patients is not always possible and the notion of a life-plan is often nonexistent, thus preventing adequate management of the disease. Screening programs are not adapted for marginal and socially excluded populations. Solutions can be found but they depend on both social and health policies and the behaviour of every individual professional care-provider.