<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"FAMINE MORTALITY IN AFRICA."
Abstract:"The evidence of African famine mortality is briefly reviewed in terms of: (1) the probable biological effects of given conditions of food shortage, displacement, exposure to disease and other risks; (2) the observed effects of actual famine and food crisis on mortality. The evidence from both sources is weak, but it is possible to conclude that the large variation in mortality observed between different situations chiefly reflects the very different situations described by the word famine; that the very heavy mortality observed in many camps of displaced people is primarily from disease but that changes in food quantity and quality have contributed to this; that excess mortality in undisplaced famine-affected populations, where no epidemic has been observed, may on biological grounds be attributed to dietary change; that the pattern of age-specific and sex-specific mortality observed is essentially an exaggeration of normal patterns, the exceptions being largely attributable to local circumstances. Finally, it is concluded that the approximate nature of many famine statistics suggests caution in separating famine mortality from other causes of mortality in Africa; and that, outside of specific locations, famine mortality is - relative to other causes of death - statistically unimportant.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
FAMINE MORTALITY IN AFRICA
The evidence of African famine mortality is briefly reviewed in terms of: (1) the probable biological effects of given conditions of food shortage, displacement, exposure to disease and other risks; (2) the observed effects of actual famine and food crisis on mortality. The evidence from both sources is weak, but it is possible to conclude that the large variation in mortality observed between different situations chiefly reflects the very different situations described by the word famine; that the very heavy mortality observed in many camps of displaced people is primarily from disease but that changes in food quantity and quality have contributed to this; that excess mortality in undisplaced famine-affected populations, where no epidemic has been observed, may on biological grounds be attributed to dietary change; that the pattern of age-specific and sex-specific mortality observed is essentially an exaggeration of normal patterns, the exceptions being largely attributable to local circumstances. Finally, it is concluded that the approximate nature of many famine statistics suggests caution in separating famine mortality from other causes of mortality in Africa; and that, outside of specific locations, famine mortality is - relative to other causes of death - statistically unimportant.