<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Does European human rights law matter? Implementation and domestic impact of Strasbourg Court judgments on minority-related policies."
Abstract:"Since the 1990s, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has witnessed an unparalleled growth in its caseload, in tandem with the expansion of its jurisprudential authority vis-a-vis states. Yet, scholars studying European integration and political scientists have paid little attention to the complex and variable ways in which the ECtHR judicial rule-making interacts with national political systems and societies. This article examines the implementation of ECtHR judgments in cases brought to it by individuals from sexual minorities, historical ethnic and religious minorities, and immigrants and asylum seekers from five countries: Greece, Bulgaria, Austria, France and the UK. It argues that European human rights case law matters, and that its implementation can influence domestic legal and policy change under particular preconditions. It is most likely to do so, in the first place, through repeat litigation and legal mobilisation by interested civil society and minority actors, capable of exerting pressure and linking Court rulings to policy issues and reforms. Furthermore, the ability of European human rights case law to expand rights at the national level crucially depends on support by domestic political and other influential elites.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Does European human rights law matter? Implementation and domestic impact of Strasbourg Court judgments on minority-related policies
Since the 1990s, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has witnessed an unparalleled growth in its caseload, in tandem with the expansion of its jurisprudential authority vis-a-vis states. Yet, scholars studying European integration and political scientists have paid little attention to the complex and variable ways in which the ECtHR judicial rule-making interacts with national political systems and societies. This article examines the implementation of ECtHR judgments in cases brought to it by individuals from sexual minorities, historical ethnic and religious minorities, and immigrants and asylum seekers from five countries: Greece, Bulgaria, Austria, France and the UK. It argues that European human rights case law matters, and that its implementation can influence domestic legal and policy change under particular preconditions. It is most likely to do so, in the first place, through repeat litigation and legal mobilisation by interested civil society and minority actors, capable of exerting pressure and linking Court rulings to policy issues and reforms. Furthermore, the ability of European human rights case law to expand rights at the national level crucially depends on support by domestic political and other influential elites.