<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Out on a limb in Suriname."
Abstract:"With pristine tropical rainforest blanketing 80 percent of its terrain, Suriname is among the world's most heavily forested countries. But now that the country is on the brink of economic collapse, it is under enormous pressure to restructure its economy and heal the wounds of twelve years of civil unrest. Poor, bereft of foreign currency reserves, suffering 500-percent annual inflation and high unemployment, Suriname is desperately resisting foreign advice to implement structural adjustment. to attract investment, the government is poised to award forest concessions covering one fourth of the nation's territory to Asian timber barons whose records in Malaysia and Indonesia do not inspire confidence. Unless Suriname revises its current plans, it will forego tens of millions of dollars in annual revenues -up to 10 percent of gross domestic product - through poorly negotiated logging contracts under which it essentially gives away its forests while getting shattered biodiversity, ruined fisheries, eroded soil, displaced populations, and perhaps ethnic strife in return. The draft concession contracts have already been submitted to Parliament, but Suriname still has the option of revising the contracts and changing various policies to forestall economic, social and environmental damages. The author recommends pragmatic ways that the Government of Suriname could improve concession policy. If it changed the way that forestry concessions are awarded, taxed, and enforced, the government could prevent the worst environmental damage and reap more revenue to deal with its most pressing social and economic problems. Specifically, the author proposes that the government auction off concessions after establishing minimum bids and making sure that prospective bidders have good track record in other countries, in addition to levying value-added taxes on timber and processed wood products. To curb negative social impacts and create better jobs, the government can launch a program to protect communal lands, sharing information with forest communities on pending development proposals, and requiring social impact assessments for concessions within or bordering on communal lands. Establishing a program to continuously monitor forest concessionaires' performance would help ensure compliance with contract provisions. Requiring that concessionaires and wood-processing industries meet minimum employment standards and integrate training and apprenticeship programs into their business plans could bolster social progress. Government could also help ensure that concession workers have the right to join labor unions. Finally, everyone with a stake in the forests must be represented in decision-making circles if concession agreements are to reflect their rights and interests. Suriname has already established a set of councils designed to give people in the hinterland a say in decisions that will profoundly affect their lives, but the nation has been unable to implement them be."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [2];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [16];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
Out on a limb in Suriname
With pristine tropical rainforest blanketing 80 percent of its terrain, Suriname is among the world's most heavily forested countries. But now that the country is on the brink of economic collapse, it is under enormous pressure to restructure its economy and heal the wounds of twelve years of civil unrest. Poor, bereft of foreign currency reserves, suffering 500-percent annual inflation and high unemployment, Suriname is desperately resisting foreign advice to implement structural adjustment. to attract investment, the government is poised to award forest concessions covering one fourth of the nation's territory to Asian timber barons whose records in Malaysia and Indonesia do not inspire confidence. Unless Suriname revises its current plans, it will forego tens of millions of dollars in annual revenues -up to 10 percent of gross domestic product - through poorly negotiated logging contracts under which it essentially gives away its forests while getting shattered biodiversity, ruined fisheries, eroded soil, displaced populations, and perhaps ethnic strife in return. The draft concession contracts have already been submitted to Parliament, but Suriname still has the option of revising the contracts and changing various policies to forestall economic, social and environmental damages. The author recommends pragmatic ways that the Government of Suriname could improve concession policy. If it changed the way that forestry concessions are awarded, taxed, and enforced, the government could prevent the worst environmental damage and reap more revenue to deal with its most pressing social and economic problems. Specifically, the author proposes that the government auction off concessions after establishing minimum bids and making sure that prospective bidders have good track record in other countries, in addition to levying value-added taxes on timber and processed wood products. To curb negative social impacts and create better jobs, the government can launch a program to protect communal lands, sharing information with forest communities on pending development proposals, and requiring social impact assessments for concessions within or bordering on communal lands. Establishing a program to continuously monitor forest concessionaires' performance would help ensure compliance with contract provisions. Requiring that concessionaires and wood-processing industries meet minimum employment standards and integrate training and apprenticeship programs into their business plans could bolster social progress. Government could also help ensure that concession workers have the right to join labor unions. Finally, everyone with a stake in the forests must be represented in decision-making circles if concession agreements are to reflect their rights and interests. Suriname has already established a set of councils designed to give people in the hinterland a say in decisions that will profoundly affect their lives, but the nation has been unable to implement them because of budget constraints. Supporting these participatory mechanisms should be a key part of any international assistance package.