<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Words don't come easy: Al Jazeera's migrant-refugee distinction and the European culture of (mis)trust."
Abstract:"Al Jazeera's August 2015 editorial decision to substitute refugee' for economic migrant' in its coverage of the Mediterranean Migration Crisis' provides an opportunity to re-frame the relationship between the politics of race, immigration and media representations of refugees. Situating the broadcaster's publicly announced rationale for the decision within a critique of the migrant-refugee dichotomy enforced by European public policy, this article, first, demonstrates that the policy couplet mobilizes oppositional yet interdependent identities. The discursive distancing of migrant' from refugee' in news content does not dislodge their mutually reinforcing power to define the parameters of inclusion'. Second, the article examines how the policy onus placed on refugees to justify their claim as victims' reproduces racialized codes of belonging that perpetuate the denial of autonomy. Persons seeking refuge in Europe must sustain an identity of non-threatening victim' if they are to gain recognition in a securitized culture of (mis)trust. Al Jazeera's intervention strengthens the media representation of refugees as human beings without choice; yet, the broadcaster's decision to give voice' by challenging racism' does not break the European political consensus on immigration and asylum that positions non-Western' peoples as victim/pariah, to be saved' and suspected'. The media-policy-migration nexus ensures that refugee exclusion is always possible.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Words don't come easy: Al Jazeera's migrant-refugee distinction and the European culture of (mis)trust
Al Jazeera's August 2015 editorial decision to substitute refugee' for economic migrant' in its coverage of the Mediterranean Migration Crisis' provides an opportunity to re-frame the relationship between the politics of race, immigration and media representations of refugees. Situating the broadcaster's publicly announced rationale for the decision within a critique of the migrant-refugee dichotomy enforced by European public policy, this article, first, demonstrates that the policy couplet mobilizes oppositional yet interdependent identities. The discursive distancing of migrant' from refugee' in news content does not dislodge their mutually reinforcing power to define the parameters of inclusion'. Second, the article examines how the policy onus placed on refugees to justify their claim as victims' reproduces racialized codes of belonging that perpetuate the denial of autonomy. Persons seeking refuge in Europe must sustain an identity of non-threatening victim' if they are to gain recognition in a securitized culture of (mis)trust. Al Jazeera's intervention strengthens the media representation of refugees as human beings without choice; yet, the broadcaster's decision to give voice' by challenging racism' does not break the European political consensus on immigration and asylum that positions non-Western' peoples as victim/pariah, to be saved' and suspected'. The media-policy-migration nexus ensures that refugee exclusion is always possible.