<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Asylum hard cases: sexual orientation, female genital mutilation and health in the jurisprudence of national supreme courts and the EctHR."
Abstract:"The short comment that follows examines three categories of cases regarding asylum and refugee rights according to the Geneva Convention provisions (1951) and the European Convention of Human Rights (Art. 3): a) cases where a fear of persecution to the country of origin is based on the applicant's sexual orientation (homosexuality); b) cases where the fear of persecution is connected with practices of female genital mutilation; c) cases regarding serious health problems of the asylum seeker. The jurisprudence of national supreme courts and EctHR on these subjects especially regarding the interpretation of Art. 3 ECHR which forbids torture, inhuman and degrading treatment is analysed. As it will be briefly illustrated though an international consensus exists today regarding the protection of asylum seekers on the basis of sexual diversity (homosexuality), in cases of female genital mutilation and health problems the national supreme courts and the ECtHR are far more hesitant in acknowledging asylum rights and refugee status.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Asylum hard cases: sexual orientation, female genital mutilation and health in the jurisprudence of national supreme courts and the EctHR
The short comment that follows examines three categories of cases regarding asylum and refugee rights according to the Geneva Convention provisions (1951) and the European Convention of Human Rights (Art. 3): a) cases where a fear of persecution to the country of origin is based on the applicant's sexual orientation (homosexuality); b) cases where the fear of persecution is connected with practices of female genital mutilation; c) cases regarding serious health problems of the asylum seeker. The jurisprudence of national supreme courts and EctHR on these subjects especially regarding the interpretation of Art. 3 ECHR which forbids torture, inhuman and degrading treatment is analysed. As it will be briefly illustrated though an international consensus exists today regarding the protection of asylum seekers on the basis of sexual diversity (homosexuality), in cases of female genital mutilation and health problems the national supreme courts and the ECtHR are far more hesitant in acknowledging asylum rights and refugee status.