<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Contested regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: the case of the Bali Process and the protection of refugees."
Abstract:"Due to the lack of formal refugee protection framework, the Asia-Pacific region represents a particularly interesting case study regarding the interface between migration management and refugee protection. Since the end of the Indochinese refugee crisis in the late 1990s, priorities have largely shifted towards a more security and law enforcement approach, as embedded in particular in the Bali Process on People smuggling, Trafficking in Persons and Related Transnational Crime, the main Regional Consultative Process in the region. Yet, various others migration-related initiatives have been taken in recent years outside the Bali Process, and somehow against the Bali Process. These resulted in the adoption of numerous statements, roadmaps or of more formal (albeit non-binding) 'declarations', some of them with a stronger focus on refugee protection. This contribution sets out to shed light on the development of regional migration governance in the Asia-Pacific by analysing the reasons behind the proliferation of migration-related initiatives in the region and the resulting increase in the number of non-binding intergovernmental frameworks on migration in the region. Against this backdrop, it is argued that this phenomenon is essentially the result of a situation of contested regionalism where either substantive issues (in particular the inclusion or lack thereof of human rights and refugee protection considerations in the work of the Bali Process) or organizational/institutional issues (essentially the prominent role of Australia) have been contested by other states and/or international organizations through processes known as regime shifting and competitive regime creation.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Contested regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: the case of the Bali Process and the protection of refugees
Due to the lack of formal refugee protection framework, the Asia-Pacific region represents a particularly interesting case study regarding the interface between migration management and refugee protection. Since the end of the Indochinese refugee crisis in the late 1990s, priorities have largely shifted towards a more security and law enforcement approach, as embedded in particular in the Bali Process on People smuggling, Trafficking in Persons and Related Transnational Crime, the main Regional Consultative Process in the region. Yet, various others migration-related initiatives have been taken in recent years outside the Bali Process, and somehow against the Bali Process. These resulted in the adoption of numerous statements, roadmaps or of more formal (albeit non-binding) 'declarations', some of them with a stronger focus on refugee protection. This contribution sets out to shed light on the development of regional migration governance in the Asia-Pacific by analysing the reasons behind the proliferation of migration-related initiatives in the region and the resulting increase in the number of non-binding intergovernmental frameworks on migration in the region. Against this backdrop, it is argued that this phenomenon is essentially the result of a situation of contested regionalism where either substantive issues (in particular the inclusion or lack thereof of human rights and refugee protection considerations in the work of the Bali Process) or organizational/institutional issues (essentially the prominent role of Australia) have been contested by other states and/or international organizations through processes known as regime shifting and competitive regime creation.