<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Environmental pollution and migrant settlement decision: Evidence from China."
Abstract:"With the development of economy, people's awareness of environmental protection has been constantly awak-ened, and their attention to environmental governance has also been increasing. The environmental conditions of residential areas are also becoming more and more important for residents to make settlement decisions. This study is the first to match the data of the air quality index to the data on the health monitoring of the floating population at the urban level. Moreover, it is the first to discuss the influence of environmental pollu-tion on the settlement decision of the floating population. The results reveal that the higher the degree of envi-ronmental pollution (the level of infrastructure and public welfare) in a city, the greater the probability that the floating population will leave the city. The effects of environmental pollution are significant after consider-ing other household, personal, and city characteristics of a population. Regarding family income constraints, the impact of environmental pollution on the migration decision of middle-income groups in the floating popu-lation is significantly lower than that of low-income groups. Moreover, there is a threshold effect of income. The influence of environmental pollution on the corresponding floating population settlement decision is dif-ferent under different urban scales and current housing prices.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [2];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [12];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
Environmental pollution and migrant settlement decision: Evidence from China
With the development of economy, people's awareness of environmental protection has been constantly awak-ened, and their attention to environmental governance has also been increasing. The environmental conditions of residential areas are also becoming more and more important for residents to make settlement decisions. This study is the first to match the data of the air quality index to the data on the health monitoring of the floating population at the urban level. Moreover, it is the first to discuss the influence of environmental pollu-tion on the settlement decision of the floating population. The results reveal that the higher the degree of envi-ronmental pollution (the level of infrastructure and public welfare) in a city, the greater the probability that the floating population will leave the city. The effects of environmental pollution are significant after consider-ing other household, personal, and city characteristics of a population. Regarding family income constraints, the impact of environmental pollution on the migration decision of middle-income groups in the floating popu-lation is significantly lower than that of low-income groups. Moreover, there is a threshold effect of income. The influence of environmental pollution on the corresponding floating population settlement decision is dif-ferent under different urban scales and current housing prices.