<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Contrasting colonisations: (re)storying Newfoundland/Ktaqmkuk as place."
Abstract:"The island of Newfoundland/Ktaqmkuk is the traditional territory of the Mi'kmaq and Beothuk people. However, this truth is rarely acknowledged in the official and popular stories of the island as place. In Newfoundland, dominant stories construct a particular sense of the island as place, which often work to displace and ignore the histories and experiences of Indigenous Newfoundlanders, especially the large population of Mi'kmaq people living on the island. They also displace and ignore the role that settler Newfoundlanders play in perpetuating the colonisation of Indigenous peoples on the island. This article asks how including the story of settler colonialism in dominant understandings of colonialism can unsettle the official and popular stories of Newfoundland as place and homogenous characterisations of Newfoundland identity in the island's cultural memory. It explores points of intersection between these two understandings of colonialism in three historical periods, including Newfoundland's time as a British colony, the process of joining Canada and the post-Confederation period. Without including settler colonialism, vital understandings of these events and their consequences for Indigenous peoples are rendered invisible. The framework of comparative colonialisms creates a starting place for building authentic and accountable solidarities between Indigenous and settler Newfoundlanders.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Contrasting colonisations: (re)storying Newfoundland/Ktaqmkuk as place
The island of Newfoundland/Ktaqmkuk is the traditional territory of the Mi'kmaq and Beothuk people. However, this truth is rarely acknowledged in the official and popular stories of the island as place. In Newfoundland, dominant stories construct a particular sense of the island as place, which often work to displace and ignore the histories and experiences of Indigenous Newfoundlanders, especially the large population of Mi'kmaq people living on the island. They also displace and ignore the role that settler Newfoundlanders play in perpetuating the colonisation of Indigenous peoples on the island. This article asks how including the story of settler colonialism in dominant understandings of colonialism can unsettle the official and popular stories of Newfoundland as place and homogenous characterisations of Newfoundland identity in the island's cultural memory. It explores points of intersection between these two understandings of colonialism in three historical periods, including Newfoundland's time as a British colony, the process of joining Canada and the post-Confederation period. Without including settler colonialism, vital understandings of these events and their consequences for Indigenous peoples are rendered invisible. The framework of comparative colonialisms creates a starting place for building authentic and accountable solidarities between Indigenous and settler Newfoundlanders.