<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Conceptualising Obstacles to Local Integration of Refugees in Ghana."
Abstract:"The need for durable solutions to protracted refugee situations is shifting stakeholders' attention to the strengths of local integration in first asylum countries despite the complexities involved. In the absence of workable voluntary repatriation and third country resettlement options, refugees already in first asylum destinations, can have their stay formalised to seize opportunities to improve their lives. This argument is further strengthened by the donor community's preference for new refugee influxes rather than protracted cases, and the promotion of regional solutions to the world's refugee crisis. However, the local integration context is often downplayed, with emphasis mainly on refugee willingness to accept local integration and the host country legal framework. This article argues that successful local refugee integration is not isolated at the end of the refugee cycle but rather starts the very day refugees are received into an asylum country. The paper identifies three key local integration issues: land acquisition for the location of a refugee camp, host-refugee interactions, and humanitarian response to the refugee influx, and proposes a framework based on these issues. The way in which stakeholders manage these issues holds the key to successful local integration of refugees in the global South.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Conceptualising Obstacles to Local Integration of Refugees in Ghana
The need for durable solutions to protracted refugee situations is shifting stakeholders' attention to the strengths of local integration in first asylum countries despite the complexities involved. In the absence of workable voluntary repatriation and third country resettlement options, refugees already in first asylum destinations, can have their stay formalised to seize opportunities to improve their lives. This argument is further strengthened by the donor community's preference for new refugee influxes rather than protracted cases, and the promotion of regional solutions to the world's refugee crisis. However, the local integration context is often downplayed, with emphasis mainly on refugee willingness to accept local integration and the host country legal framework. This article argues that successful local refugee integration is not isolated at the end of the refugee cycle but rather starts the very day refugees are received into an asylum country. The paper identifies three key local integration issues: land acquisition for the location of a refugee camp, host-refugee interactions, and humanitarian response to the refugee influx, and proposes a framework based on these issues. The way in which stakeholders manage these issues holds the key to successful local integration of refugees in the global South.