<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Do No Harm Issues in Psychosocial Support: Post-tsunami Practitioner Learning in Sri Lanka."
Abstract:"The 2004 Asian tsunami had profound effects on diverse countries and increased global awareness of the need for mental health and psychosocial support amidst disasters. Although disaster response efforts are known to have some negative unintended consequences, these are seldom documented, particularly years following the humanitarian crisis. This practitioner learning study was a 5-year retrospective analysis of the psychosocial work done in Sri Lanka post-tsunami. It entailed open-ended interviews and group discussions with psychosocial workers from Galle, Colombo, and Batticaloa and humanitarians from other sectors whose work had a psychosocial impact. A key finding was that the posttsunami aid was highly discriminatory since aid was provided mainly to Tsunami-affected people. In the mostly Tamil area of Batticaloa, housing and other supports were provided to tsunami survivors but not to needy people in neighboring conflict-affected areas. Do No Harm issues also arose in regard to poor coordination, the monetization of aid, excessive targeting of aid, the imposition of Western modes of psychiatric and medicalized support, too little attention to capacity building and sustainability, and the marginalization of collective self-help and indigenous, cultural and social supports. The article offers suggestions on how to prevent such Do No Harm issues from occurring and to strenghthen future work in humanitarian settings.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Do No Harm Issues in Psychosocial Support: Post-tsunami Practitioner Learning in Sri Lanka
The 2004 Asian tsunami had profound effects on diverse countries and increased global awareness of the need for mental health and psychosocial support amidst disasters. Although disaster response efforts are known to have some negative unintended consequences, these are seldom documented, particularly years following the humanitarian crisis. This practitioner learning study was a 5-year retrospective analysis of the psychosocial work done in Sri Lanka post-tsunami. It entailed open-ended interviews and group discussions with psychosocial workers from Galle, Colombo, and Batticaloa and humanitarians from other sectors whose work had a psychosocial impact. A key finding was that the posttsunami aid was highly discriminatory since aid was provided mainly to Tsunami-affected people. In the mostly Tamil area of Batticaloa, housing and other supports were provided to tsunami survivors but not to needy people in neighboring conflict-affected areas. Do No Harm issues also arose in regard to poor coordination, the monetization of aid, excessive targeting of aid, the imposition of Western modes of psychiatric and medicalized support, too little attention to capacity building and sustainability, and the marginalization of collective self-help and indigenous, cultural and social supports. The article offers suggestions on how to prevent such Do No Harm issues from occurring and to strenghthen future work in humanitarian settings.