<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders: Discourse, Power, and Policy from a Crimmigration Perspective."
Abstract:"This article examines the role of discourse in Australia's current border control policy, Operation Sovereign Borders. From a crimmigration perspective, it examines how discourse contributes to the dichotomous understanding of crimmigration as combining loud panicking and quiet manoeuvring. A Critical Discourse Analysis is applied, thereby examining not only the discourse at a textual level, but also how the discursive setting and the socio-political context influence the effects of discourse. The results show that Operation Sovereign Borders focuses on border protection and securitization through a strong and consistent deterrence policy. It creates loud panic vis-a-vis crimmigrant others and draws border securitization into the field of administrative immigration control. Immigrants are distinguished on the basis of their mode of transportation, creating an image of a homogeneous crimmigrant group of illegal and non-deserving boat migrants buying places from human traffickers. Through offshore processing and a dominant discourse, the Australian Government is simultaneously able to quietly manoeuvre, thereby leaving little room for alternative discourses or critiques. Discourse thus plays a pivotal role in creating loud panic and in enabling quiet manoeuvring, which are much more interwoven and mutually reinforcing than sometimes suggested. This fosters the Government's ability to effectively implement restrictive immigration measures.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders: Discourse, Power, and Policy from a Crimmigration Perspective
This article examines the role of discourse in Australia's current border control policy, Operation Sovereign Borders. From a crimmigration perspective, it examines how discourse contributes to the dichotomous understanding of crimmigration as combining loud panicking and quiet manoeuvring. A Critical Discourse Analysis is applied, thereby examining not only the discourse at a textual level, but also how the discursive setting and the socio-political context influence the effects of discourse. The results show that Operation Sovereign Borders focuses on border protection and securitization through a strong and consistent deterrence policy. It creates loud panic vis-a-vis crimmigrant others and draws border securitization into the field of administrative immigration control. Immigrants are distinguished on the basis of their mode of transportation, creating an image of a homogeneous crimmigrant group of illegal and non-deserving boat migrants buying places from human traffickers. Through offshore processing and a dominant discourse, the Australian Government is simultaneously able to quietly manoeuvre, thereby leaving little room for alternative discourses or critiques. Discourse thus plays a pivotal role in creating loud panic and in enabling quiet manoeuvring, which are much more interwoven and mutually reinforcing than sometimes suggested. This fosters the Government's ability to effectively implement restrictive immigration measures.