<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Out of Place, Still in Motion: Shaping (Im)Mobility Through Urban Regulation."
Abstract:"Historically, in Mexico City, people who conduct trade on the streets have been engaged with a highly regulated world of spatial restrictions, fines and detentions, still they remain on the streets. This article explores how the regulation of street-vending activities has contributed to the constitution of an ideal hierarchy of would-be social agents in public spaces by consecrating the distinction between authorized and unauthorized street users. The central aim of this article is to understand and explain how people who have been defined as out of place in the urban realm have become constituted as mobile' actors in order to stay' in the spaces from which they were originally displaced. Street vendors find that, in exchange for a license, which provides them some security and stability, they must confront challenging legal and bureaucratic demands; whereas, vendors who choose to be unlicensed must employ other strategies, such as being mobile. These regulatory strategies seem to condemn them to work at the margins of the central city. However, neither their daily mobility nor their spatial location is restricted to what the law states'; everyday needs to earn a living determine the need to (re)create a particular way of being on the streets influenced, but not constricted, by state delimitation of the specific spaces and times where the population should perform routine footwork.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [6];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Out of Place, Still in Motion: Shaping (Im)Mobility Through Urban Regulation
Historically, in Mexico City, people who conduct trade on the streets have been engaged with a highly regulated world of spatial restrictions, fines and detentions, still they remain on the streets. This article explores how the regulation of street-vending activities has contributed to the constitution of an ideal hierarchy of would-be social agents in public spaces by consecrating the distinction between authorized and unauthorized street users. The central aim of this article is to understand and explain how people who have been defined as out of place in the urban realm have become constituted as mobile' actors in order to stay' in the spaces from which they were originally displaced. Street vendors find that, in exchange for a license, which provides them some security and stability, they must confront challenging legal and bureaucratic demands; whereas, vendors who choose to be unlicensed must employ other strategies, such as being mobile. These regulatory strategies seem to condemn them to work at the margins of the central city. However, neither their daily mobility nor their spatial location is restricted to what the law states'; everyday needs to earn a living determine the need to (re)create a particular way of being on the streets influenced, but not constricted, by state delimitation of the specific spaces and times where the population should perform routine footwork.