<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The language of risk and the risk of language: Mismatches in risk response in Cuban coastal villages."
Abstract:"Like other Caribbean countries, Cuba has adopted policies to relocate populations and prohibit (re)building in coastal zones at risk of climate change effects. Yet residents do not uniformly see such measures as welfare promoting and risk reducing, and may resist relocation, even in places where disaster planning is respected and effective. In such instances, vernacular narratives reveal local understandings of threats, vulnerabilities, and the measures taken by the state. Drawing on the case of Carahatas, a coastal community in Cuba, this study contrasts local residents' understanding of risks with those apparent in public policy. Results from this extensive case study (2016-2020) reveal how citizens resist relocation and struggle for continuity in a context of marginalization. Most residents are less afraid of sea level rise than relocation and prefer to maintain their livelihoods and traditions. Local voices reflect a focus on the risks of daily life. Public policies-based on the adaptation-resilience framework-prioritize instead a longer-term approach, emphasizing safety and best use of state resources over maintenance of existing livelihoods, settlements, and social networks. Understanding vernacular explanations of risk and disasters is crucial to develop risk reduction policy that respond to people's needs and expectations.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [1,2];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [22];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
The language of risk and the risk of language: Mismatches in risk response in Cuban coastal villages
Like other Caribbean countries, Cuba has adopted policies to relocate populations and prohibit (re)building in coastal zones at risk of climate change effects. Yet residents do not uniformly see such measures as welfare promoting and risk reducing, and may resist relocation, even in places where disaster planning is respected and effective. In such instances, vernacular narratives reveal local understandings of threats, vulnerabilities, and the measures taken by the state. Drawing on the case of Carahatas, a coastal community in Cuba, this study contrasts local residents' understanding of risks with those apparent in public policy. Results from this extensive case study (2016-2020) reveal how citizens resist relocation and struggle for continuity in a context of marginalization. Most residents are less afraid of sea level rise than relocation and prefer to maintain their livelihoods and traditions. Local voices reflect a focus on the risks of daily life. Public policies-based on the adaptation-resilience framework-prioritize instead a longer-term approach, emphasizing safety and best use of state resources over maintenance of existing livelihoods, settlements, and social networks. Understanding vernacular explanations of risk and disasters is crucial to develop risk reduction policy that respond to people's needs and expectations.