<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Advantages and obstacles to retrofitting benefit-sharing after development-induced displacement and resettlement."
Abstract:"Although many older development initiatives displaced people without benefit-sharing, the literature suggests that benefit-sharing may be added, or retrofitted, to an existing revenue-producing development project. This article looks at the potential for retrofitting benefit-sharing in a hydropower project in Western Mali, using results collected directly after resettlement in the late 1980s, in 1993-94, and in 2016-18. Retrofitting a benefit-sharing program at Manantali would allow resettled populations to correct deficiencies in resettlement implementation and to meet new post-displacement challenges. Moreover, Manantali residents are better prepared now than they were at resettlement to understand the advantages and constraints in resettlement areas. Retrofitting a benefit-sharing program requires that the planners address issues of eligibility, structure, and management of the program as well as other obstacles and challenges. There is no general formula for retrofitting, but each program needs to be adapted to the particular circumstances of people, place, and infrastructure.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [2];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [42];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
Advantages and obstacles to retrofitting benefit-sharing after development-induced displacement and resettlement
Although many older development initiatives displaced people without benefit-sharing, the literature suggests that benefit-sharing may be added, or retrofitted, to an existing revenue-producing development project. This article looks at the potential for retrofitting benefit-sharing in a hydropower project in Western Mali, using results collected directly after resettlement in the late 1980s, in 1993-94, and in 2016-18. Retrofitting a benefit-sharing program at Manantali would allow resettled populations to correct deficiencies in resettlement implementation and to meet new post-displacement challenges. Moreover, Manantali residents are better prepared now than they were at resettlement to understand the advantages and constraints in resettlement areas. Retrofitting a benefit-sharing program requires that the planners address issues of eligibility, structure, and management of the program as well as other obstacles and challenges. There is no general formula for retrofitting, but each program needs to be adapted to the particular circumstances of people, place, and infrastructure.