<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"'ON THE OTHER HAND ... ' THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND SOME DISCOURSES ON POPULATION."
Abstract:"The current world population of 7.2 billion is projected to increase by almost one billion people within the next twelve years, reaching 8.1 billion in 2025 and 9.6 billion in 2050. Most of the population growth will occur in developing regions, which are projected to increase from 5.9 billion in 2013 to 8.2 billion in 2050. Growth is expected to be most rapid in the least developed countries, which are projected to double in size from around 900 million inhabitants in 2013 to 1.8 billion in 2050. Overall, birth rates in economically advanced countries are consistently falling, the age-balance shifting towards an increasing number of people who are older or chronically sick, and therefore placing worrying pressure on health and social services. Meanwhile, economic, political and environmental factors are bringing about increases in migration levels, and making it difficult to predict population figures in receiving countries.(1) This paper is motivated by the difficulties encountered by Catholics engaged in negotiating some Catholic discourses on population in the public sphere. Paul Ricoeur's discourse theory is used to review some secular and Catholic discourses that are influential in the global dialogue, and to argue that although the Roman Catholic Church gives the impression of speaking as one voice, there are in fact different discourses operating within it. Turning to Evangelii Gaudium, it quotes Pope Francis in arguing the need to be able to say 'on the other hand', and argues the case against employing discourses of judgement, either inside or outside the Church.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
'ON THE OTHER HAND ... ' THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND SOME DISCOURSES ON POPULATION
The current world population of 7.2 billion is projected to increase by almost one billion people within the next twelve years, reaching 8.1 billion in 2025 and 9.6 billion in 2050. Most of the population growth will occur in developing regions, which are projected to increase from 5.9 billion in 2013 to 8.2 billion in 2050. Growth is expected to be most rapid in the least developed countries, which are projected to double in size from around 900 million inhabitants in 2013 to 1.8 billion in 2050. Overall, birth rates in economically advanced countries are consistently falling, the age-balance shifting towards an increasing number of people who are older or chronically sick, and therefore placing worrying pressure on health and social services. Meanwhile, economic, political and environmental factors are bringing about increases in migration levels, and making it difficult to predict population figures in receiving countries.(1) This paper is motivated by the difficulties encountered by Catholics engaged in negotiating some Catholic discourses on population in the public sphere. Paul Ricoeur's discourse theory is used to review some secular and Catholic discourses that are influential in the global dialogue, and to argue that although the Roman Catholic Church gives the impression of speaking as one voice, there are in fact different discourses operating within it. Turning to Evangelii Gaudium, it quotes Pope Francis in arguing the need to be able to say 'on the other hand', and argues the case against employing discourses of judgement, either inside or outside the Church.