<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Settlement Closure or Persistence: A Comparison of Kangeq and Kapisillit, Greenland."
Abstract:"The founding and later persistence or demise of a settlement is often due to aspects of site and situation and their interplay. Historically, settlements in Greenland were located based on site characteristics, particularly animal resource exploitation possibilities, but fluctuations in the resource base often would impel people to relocate to places with better prospects. Settlements would be abandoned and new ones developed. In modern times the vagaries of nature have been accompanied by governmental directives which influenced settlement survival, growth, or closure. Kangeq and Kapisillit are two places where the interplays between site and situation eventually led to the closure of one and the survival of the other. This paper demonstrates that both locales shared some early history as well as some site traits and situational factors. The demise of Kangeq is shown to be mainly the result of a change in sea temperature and the Danish colonial government's G50 and G60 initiatives. Kapisillit persisted through environmental change and population decline, and benefitted somewhat from certain government programs although cultural attitudes impeded the reindeer domestication experiment. Greenland Self-rule in the 21st Century meant better government understanding of Inuit sensibilities, and now there is the possibility that Kapisillit will remain a viable settlement and that Kangeq might have some kind of modest reemergence.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [2,3,5,6];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [5,22];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [0].
Settlement Closure or Persistence: A Comparison of Kangeq and Kapisillit, Greenland
The founding and later persistence or demise of a settlement is often due to aspects of site and situation and their interplay. Historically, settlements in Greenland were located based on site characteristics, particularly animal resource exploitation possibilities, but fluctuations in the resource base often would impel people to relocate to places with better prospects. Settlements would be abandoned and new ones developed. In modern times the vagaries of nature have been accompanied by governmental directives which influenced settlement survival, growth, or closure. Kangeq and Kapisillit are two places where the interplays between site and situation eventually led to the closure of one and the survival of the other. This paper demonstrates that both locales shared some early history as well as some site traits and situational factors. The demise of Kangeq is shown to be mainly the result of a change in sea temperature and the Danish colonial government's G50 and G60 initiatives. Kapisillit persisted through environmental change and population decline, and benefitted somewhat from certain government programs although cultural attitudes impeded the reindeer domestication experiment. Greenland Self-rule in the 21st Century meant better government understanding of Inuit sensibilities, and now there is the possibility that Kapisillit will remain a viable settlement and that Kangeq might have some kind of modest reemergence.