<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Inter-regional differences in body proportions in Indian children and adolescents-a cross-sectional multicentric study."
Abstract:"Background: Sitting height (SH) and leg length (LL) help in assessing disproportionate growth. Anthropometric dissimilarity has been observed in different ethnicities. Aim: To (1) study sitting height and body proportions in children from different regions of India; and (2) compare sitting height and body proportions with data from other countries. Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional multicentric observational study, where 7961 (4328 boys) 3-18 year old children from five regions (north, south, east, west and central) were measured (height, weight and SH). Results: Boys from north India and girls from central India were taller and heavier (mean height 153.2 +/- 18, 146.4 +/- 11), while western boys and girls were the shortest (131.1 +/- 20.7, 129.8 +/- 19.5) (p < 0.05 for all). The highest SH was observed in the north (79.2 +/- 8.5) and the lowest in the west (68.8 +/- 9.1). Mean SH:LL ratio was highest in children from the northeast (1.13) followed by those from western, northern and central India (1.12, 1.10 and 1.07, respectively) and the ratio was the least in children from south India (1.05) (p < 0.0.5 for all except northeast and west). Children from the north and west were similar to the Dutch, children from the south were similar to South (black) Africans and the north-eastern children were similar to Chinese children. Conclusion: There were inter-regional differences in body proportions; similarities in body proportions with children from other ethnicities may throw light on the migration history of Indian people.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [0];
Q6 = [1].
Inter-regional differences in body proportions in Indian children and adolescents-a cross-sectional multicentric study
Background: Sitting height (SH) and leg length (LL) help in assessing disproportionate growth. Anthropometric dissimilarity has been observed in different ethnicities. Aim: To (1) study sitting height and body proportions in children from different regions of India; and (2) compare sitting height and body proportions with data from other countries. Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional multicentric observational study, where 7961 (4328 boys) 3-18 year old children from five regions (north, south, east, west and central) were measured (height, weight and SH). Results: Boys from north India and girls from central India were taller and heavier (mean height 153.2 +/- 18, 146.4 +/- 11), while western boys and girls were the shortest (131.1 +/- 20.7, 129.8 +/- 19.5) (p < 0.05 for all). The highest SH was observed in the north (79.2 +/- 8.5) and the lowest in the west (68.8 +/- 9.1). Mean SH:LL ratio was highest in children from the northeast (1.13) followed by those from western, northern and central India (1.12, 1.10 and 1.07, respectively) and the ratio was the least in children from south India (1.05) (p < 0.0.5 for all except northeast and west). Children from the north and west were similar to the Dutch, children from the south were similar to South (black) Africans and the north-eastern children were similar to Chinese children. Conclusion: There were inter-regional differences in body proportions; similarities in body proportions with children from other ethnicities may throw light on the migration history of Indian people.