<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Language preferences among callers to a regional Poison Center."
Abstract:"Providing service to non-English speaking populations is a common challenge facing Poison Centers (PC). Previous studies have identified that people who do not speak functional English are unlikely to call a PC. We developed a survey to determine the language preferences of poison center callers and to identify we were failing to offer services in languages other than English to callers who felt they needed them. We surveyed 322 parents during routine callbacks about language spoken at home, first and second languages, country of birth, and satisfaction with language used by the PC. We found that 93% primarily spoke English, 5% spoke English and Spanish, and 5% spoke other languages at home in a region where approximately 10% of the population speak English poorly. The majority of respondents were born in the US and were comfortable using English when using the PC. There were 6 cases where callers would have preferred using a different language. Our study supports data suggesting that poison centers are underutilized by people that are recent immigrants and speak English poorly. Awareness programs and educational efforts should be directed toward this sub-population.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [0];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
Language preferences among callers to a regional Poison Center
Providing service to non-English speaking populations is a common challenge facing Poison Centers (PC). Previous studies have identified that people who do not speak functional English are unlikely to call a PC. We developed a survey to determine the language preferences of poison center callers and to identify we were failing to offer services in languages other than English to callers who felt they needed them. We surveyed 322 parents during routine callbacks about language spoken at home, first and second languages, country of birth, and satisfaction with language used by the PC. We found that 93% primarily spoke English, 5% spoke English and Spanish, and 5% spoke other languages at home in a region where approximately 10% of the population speak English poorly. The majority of respondents were born in the US and were comfortable using English when using the PC. There were 6 cases where callers would have preferred using a different language. Our study supports data suggesting that poison centers are underutilized by people that are recent immigrants and speak English poorly. Awareness programs and educational efforts should be directed toward this sub-population.