<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The right to have rights of undocumented migrants: inadequacy and rigidity of legal categories of migrants and minorities in international law of human rights."
Abstract:"This article engages with the legal and political discourses aiming to respond to the increasing presence of undocumented migrants in the European Union. It focuses on legal consequences of the discursive framing often portraying undocumented migrants as a group 'unworthy of social, economic, and political rights' as opposed to those considered genuine refugees. The article explores the opening brought by the group approach to undocumented migrants and asks whether such a group perspective could be used as a basis for recognition of group-based rights of undocumented migrants. With reference to Jacques Ranciere's conception of dissensus the article discusses the arbitrariness, inadequacy and historical contingency of legal categories of migrants and minorities in international human rights law and focuses on the existing openings in the minority protection standards in international and regional instruments. These include the strong non-discrimination focus of minority protection; the ongoing process of broadening of the minority protection encompassing also non-citizens; and the alternative theories of minority protection. Such an approach allows for experimenting with existing legal categories approaching the rights of undocumented migrants from the minority protection perspective, revealing their rigidity and dependence on the nation-state system.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
The right to have rights of undocumented migrants: inadequacy and rigidity of legal categories of migrants and minorities in international law of human rights
This article engages with the legal and political discourses aiming to respond to the increasing presence of undocumented migrants in the European Union. It focuses on legal consequences of the discursive framing often portraying undocumented migrants as a group 'unworthy of social, economic, and political rights' as opposed to those considered genuine refugees. The article explores the opening brought by the group approach to undocumented migrants and asks whether such a group perspective could be used as a basis for recognition of group-based rights of undocumented migrants. With reference to Jacques Ranciere's conception of dissensus the article discusses the arbitrariness, inadequacy and historical contingency of legal categories of migrants and minorities in international human rights law and focuses on the existing openings in the minority protection standards in international and regional instruments. These include the strong non-discrimination focus of minority protection; the ongoing process of broadening of the minority protection encompassing also non-citizens; and the alternative theories of minority protection. Such an approach allows for experimenting with existing legal categories approaching the rights of undocumented migrants from the minority protection perspective, revealing their rigidity and dependence on the nation-state system.