<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Migratory diversity in an Arctic fish supporting subsistence harvest."
Abstract:"Arctic regions are warming more than twice as quickly as other parts of the globe, threatening Arctic fish and wildlife and the human communities that rely on them. Assessing species' vulnerability to this change requires understanding their life histories and ecology, including movement patterns and habitat use. However, this information has not been documented for many Arctic species, which may not follow predicable movements in these vast and changing landscapes. In the Gwich'in Settlement Area of western Canadian Arctic, one such species is luk dagaii (in Gwich'in) or broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus). This species is the most important food fish for the Gwich'in Peoples of the region. We present results from a collaborative community-based research program established to build research capacity and address pressing research questions. Using otoliths extracted from fish caught by community monitors along the Peel River, we investigated migratory patterns using the isotopic ratio, Sr-87/Sr-86. Applying a hidden Markov model to the otolith laser ablation transects, we explored emergent model states and linked them to regions of the watershed. Across and within individuals, fish occupied the ocean and three different identified freshwater locations; however, while all fish were captured in the Peel River, none expressed an otolith signature that would suggest they grew there. Across individuals, we found large variability in migratory patterns, suggesting that migrations are not obligate and that individual fish utilize the watershed very differently. This diversity may buffer whitefish and reliant human communities against change, but indicates dependence on a large, intact watershed.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [1].
Migratory diversity in an Arctic fish supporting subsistence harvest
Arctic regions are warming more than twice as quickly as other parts of the globe, threatening Arctic fish and wildlife and the human communities that rely on them. Assessing species' vulnerability to this change requires understanding their life histories and ecology, including movement patterns and habitat use. However, this information has not been documented for many Arctic species, which may not follow predicable movements in these vast and changing landscapes. In the Gwich'in Settlement Area of western Canadian Arctic, one such species is luk dagaii (in Gwich'in) or broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus). This species is the most important food fish for the Gwich'in Peoples of the region. We present results from a collaborative community-based research program established to build research capacity and address pressing research questions. Using otoliths extracted from fish caught by community monitors along the Peel River, we investigated migratory patterns using the isotopic ratio, Sr-87/Sr-86. Applying a hidden Markov model to the otolith laser ablation transects, we explored emergent model states and linked them to regions of the watershed. Across and within individuals, fish occupied the ocean and three different identified freshwater locations; however, while all fish were captured in the Peel River, none expressed an otolith signature that would suggest they grew there. Across individuals, we found large variability in migratory patterns, suggesting that migrations are not obligate and that individual fish utilize the watershed very differently. This diversity may buffer whitefish and reliant human communities against change, but indicates dependence on a large, intact watershed.