<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Community After All? An Inside Perspective on Encampment in Haiti."
Abstract:"This article demonstrates the limits of the camp as a place to live from the point of view of displaced people: what is a camp for those who live inside? Why not envisage the camps as central place, where life is going on with, or without, the humanitarian help? It studies the differences between two different settlements created after the 2010 earthquake. One has been formally set up by non-governmental organizations but has ended up being abandoned by the humanitarian organizations due to troubles with the inhabitants. The other is a spontaneous settlement that has absorbed populations from other camps, and is today in a working condition organized informally by inhabitants themselves. In the first case, experiences of community and belonging of the post-earthquake population seems have been frustrated; in the second case, these sentiments could be an explanation of the informal forward projection. Thus, they pass from a liminal statement to a central perception. The monographic approach permits understanding the dynamics and the identitarian background of the installation in the camps.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Community After All? An Inside Perspective on Encampment in Haiti
This article demonstrates the limits of the camp as a place to live from the point of view of displaced people: what is a camp for those who live inside? Why not envisage the camps as central place, where life is going on with, or without, the humanitarian help? It studies the differences between two different settlements created after the 2010 earthquake. One has been formally set up by non-governmental organizations but has ended up being abandoned by the humanitarian organizations due to troubles with the inhabitants. The other is a spontaneous settlement that has absorbed populations from other camps, and is today in a working condition organized informally by inhabitants themselves. In the first case, experiences of community and belonging of the post-earthquake population seems have been frustrated; in the second case, these sentiments could be an explanation of the informal forward projection. Thus, they pass from a liminal statement to a central perception. The monographic approach permits understanding the dynamics and the identitarian background of the installation in the camps.