<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Collective heritage and urban politics: an uncertain future for the living culture of Rio de Janeiro?."
Abstract:"During the last decades, significant urban transformations in Rio de Janeiro led to rapid structural changes in the historic core of the city and the favelas. The following population removals, evictions and physical destruction of neighbourhoods resulted in diverse local and national forms of protest and resistance, which were widely reported in the media. But what of the cultural heritage attached to the displaced people and the disrupted places? Our research focusses on the collective nature of this cultural heritage. We argue that the current dominant political and planning decisions cannot accommodate the city's living cultural heritage which relies on everyday human activities and draws on collective social practices, everyday knowledge and rituals of social life. To support our arguments, we conducted an analysis of Rio's collective heritage with regard to urban politics using the case study of two favelas, Vila Autodromo and Morro da Providencia, which have been severely affected by urban transformations during the planning of the mega-events of 2014 and 2016. Our results reveal that urban transformations cause undue stress on the collective heritage of these communities. They also highlight the potential of using collective heritage in participation processes in urban development projects as an insurgent factor.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [0].
Collective heritage and urban politics: an uncertain future for the living culture of Rio de Janeiro?
During the last decades, significant urban transformations in Rio de Janeiro led to rapid structural changes in the historic core of the city and the favelas. The following population removals, evictions and physical destruction of neighbourhoods resulted in diverse local and national forms of protest and resistance, which were widely reported in the media. But what of the cultural heritage attached to the displaced people and the disrupted places? Our research focusses on the collective nature of this cultural heritage. We argue that the current dominant political and planning decisions cannot accommodate the city's living cultural heritage which relies on everyday human activities and draws on collective social practices, everyday knowledge and rituals of social life. To support our arguments, we conducted an analysis of Rio's collective heritage with regard to urban politics using the case study of two favelas, Vila Autodromo and Morro da Providencia, which have been severely affected by urban transformations during the planning of the mega-events of 2014 and 2016. Our results reveal that urban transformations cause undue stress on the collective heritage of these communities. They also highlight the potential of using collective heritage in participation processes in urban development projects as an insurgent factor.