<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The persecution of pharmacologists in Nazi Germany and Austria."
Abstract:"The present article is based on the brochure Verfolgte Deutschsprachige Pharmakologen 1933 by Loffelholz and Trendelenburg (2008). This book that describes the fate of the Persecuted German-speaking Pharmacologists commemorates these victims of an inhumane ideology. Half of the persecuted pharmacologists emigrated in 1933, while the majority of the German 'non-Aryans' refrained from emigrating until 1938. The reasons for the early emigration of most of the persecuted pharmacologists were the instantaneous dismissals in 1933 of almost all 'non-Aryan' scientists employed in research institutions and the fair chance to continue scientific careers in exile. The German pharmacologists emigrated to 12 different countries; at first to neighbouring countries, later on to USA (about 40%) and Great Britain (29%). Turkey, Brazil and the Jewish research institutions in Palestine hoped that immigration of these scientists would raise their academic level towards that of the Western industrial nations. The individual life stories of the persecuted pharmacologists exposed the whole range of persecution: the humiliating dismissals, the desperate odyssey of emigration, the dramatic escape from the concentration camps, and the Holocaust. On the other hand, there were cases of brilliant scientific careers in exile (especially in Great Britain). The behaviour of the 'Aryan' colleagues in Germany also exhibited a wide range, from fanatic following of the Nazi policy, opportunism and Prussian obedience to the Nazi government on the one hand, to opposition and resistance on the other. The present study describes the fate of persecuted pharmacologists against the background of the persecution policy of the Nazis.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
The persecution of pharmacologists in Nazi Germany and Austria
The present article is based on the brochure Verfolgte Deutschsprachige Pharmakologen 1933 by Loffelholz and Trendelenburg (2008). This book that describes the fate of the Persecuted German-speaking Pharmacologists commemorates these victims of an inhumane ideology. Half of the persecuted pharmacologists emigrated in 1933, while the majority of the German 'non-Aryans' refrained from emigrating until 1938. The reasons for the early emigration of most of the persecuted pharmacologists were the instantaneous dismissals in 1933 of almost all 'non-Aryan' scientists employed in research institutions and the fair chance to continue scientific careers in exile. The German pharmacologists emigrated to 12 different countries; at first to neighbouring countries, later on to USA (about 40%) and Great Britain (29%). Turkey, Brazil and the Jewish research institutions in Palestine hoped that immigration of these scientists would raise their academic level towards that of the Western industrial nations. The individual life stories of the persecuted pharmacologists exposed the whole range of persecution: the humiliating dismissals, the desperate odyssey of emigration, the dramatic escape from the concentration camps, and the Holocaust. On the other hand, there were cases of brilliant scientific careers in exile (especially in Great Britain). The behaviour of the 'Aryan' colleagues in Germany also exhibited a wide range, from fanatic following of the Nazi policy, opportunism and Prussian obedience to the Nazi government on the one hand, to opposition and resistance on the other. The present study describes the fate of persecuted pharmacologists against the background of the persecution policy of the Nazis.