<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"(Re)Producing Gender: Refugee Advocacy and Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Refugee Narratives."
Abstract:"The glaring absence of gender persecution as grounds for protection in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, the cornerstone of international refugee law, continues to impact current refugee claims driven by fear of sexual and gender-based violence. Applying a transnational, feminist and intersectional perspective, our study presents qualitative research on this particular form of violence in refugee claims. The lack of a strong, comprehensive protection framework for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in refugee law and policy complicates the process of claiming refuge. Refugee advocates have to think strategically about SGBV in refugee claims as they work within this international framework and national (Canadian) law and policy. In doing so, they (re)produce patriarchal gender assumptions. In addition, intersecting gender, race and national origin underlying legal categories make some refugee claimants more vulnerable to the threat of SGBV. Our study raises broader questions about the knowledge produced from refugee narratives about gender and gender-based violence, the role of refugee advocacy organizations, and the advantages and challenges of working with the state to advance the human rights of all refugees.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4,5,6];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
(Re)Producing Gender: Refugee Advocacy and Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Refugee Narratives
The glaring absence of gender persecution as grounds for protection in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, the cornerstone of international refugee law, continues to impact current refugee claims driven by fear of sexual and gender-based violence. Applying a transnational, feminist and intersectional perspective, our study presents qualitative research on this particular form of violence in refugee claims. The lack of a strong, comprehensive protection framework for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in refugee law and policy complicates the process of claiming refuge. Refugee advocates have to think strategically about SGBV in refugee claims as they work within this international framework and national (Canadian) law and policy. In doing so, they (re)produce patriarchal gender assumptions. In addition, intersecting gender, race and national origin underlying legal categories make some refugee claimants more vulnerable to the threat of SGBV. Our study raises broader questions about the knowledge produced from refugee narratives about gender and gender-based violence, the role of refugee advocacy organizations, and the advantages and challenges of working with the state to advance the human rights of all refugees.