<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Constructing the Refugee Figure in France: Ethnomethodology of a Decisional Process."
Abstract:"This article centres on the decisional process in the administration of asylum law in France, as applied by the institutions of the Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) and the National Court of Asylum (CNDA) on the appellate level. It focuses on the recognition of the status of political refugee and subsidiary protection. Its starting point is the growing criticism this procedure faces, both from human rights groups and legal practitioners. It is based on a dual approach. First, analysing relevant legislation and case law, it explains why, from a positivist legal perspective, the process can sometimes be perceived as arbitrary and random; the reasons being the indeterminacy of international law on the matter, and the inability of the courts to propose a unified and accepted interpretation. Second, this study demonstrates that, despite this legal insecurity, the process is not as irrational as it may seem. This conclusion is based on anthropological fieldwork consisting of a qualitative sample of hearings at the CNDA, and twelve interviews with lawyers, interpreters, protection officers from OFPRA and rapporteurs from the Court, carried out between March and May 2010. Using the paradigm of ethnomethodology, this article contends that the current decisional process follows a consistent logic, founded on 'common sense' and an inter-subjective narrative construction between the asylum seeker and his administrative counterpart. The legal aspect of the decision is only a surface veneer, rather than the constitutive body of reasoning behind it.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [5];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Constructing the Refugee Figure in France: Ethnomethodology of a Decisional Process
This article centres on the decisional process in the administration of asylum law in France, as applied by the institutions of the Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) and the National Court of Asylum (CNDA) on the appellate level. It focuses on the recognition of the status of political refugee and subsidiary protection. Its starting point is the growing criticism this procedure faces, both from human rights groups and legal practitioners. It is based on a dual approach. First, analysing relevant legislation and case law, it explains why, from a positivist legal perspective, the process can sometimes be perceived as arbitrary and random; the reasons being the indeterminacy of international law on the matter, and the inability of the courts to propose a unified and accepted interpretation. Second, this study demonstrates that, despite this legal insecurity, the process is not as irrational as it may seem. This conclusion is based on anthropological fieldwork consisting of a qualitative sample of hearings at the CNDA, and twelve interviews with lawyers, interpreters, protection officers from OFPRA and rapporteurs from the Court, carried out between March and May 2010. Using the paradigm of ethnomethodology, this article contends that the current decisional process follows a consistent logic, founded on 'common sense' and an inter-subjective narrative construction between the asylum seeker and his administrative counterpart. The legal aspect of the decision is only a surface veneer, rather than the constitutive body of reasoning behind it.