<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Moderating Effects of Social Networks on Gender-Based Violence and Intimate Partner Violence Among North Korean Refugee Women."
Abstract:"Objective: This study investigated the relationship between gender-based violence (GBV) experienced before and during migration and increased risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) among North Korean (NK) refugee women after resettlement in South Korea. We also assessed the mitigating role of two types of social networks (i.e., bonding and bridging) in the relationship between GBV and IPV. Bonding networks (i.e., relationships with people sharing similar backgrounds and experiences) have been found to protect IPV victims by providing them with emotional support, and bridging networks (i.e., extended connections with people from different backgrounds) to help victims with their response strategies to IPV. Method: A cross-sectional survey was administered to NK refugee women living in South Korea (N = 212). Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that past GBV exposure was significantly associated with current IPV exposure. Both types of social networks significantly attenuated the relationship between GBV and IPV. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that a history of GBV victimization could increase risk of IPV from current partners, as male partners of NK refugee women with experiences of GBV might perceive past sexual victimization as a disgrace and perpetrate violence during conflicts. However, IPV victimization might be prevented by enhancing social networks. Bonding networks might provide emotional support for NK refugee women, and bridging networks might help them find necessary resources and information to respond to the violence. Thus, violence prevention and intervention approaches should consider the extent to which bonding and bridging social networks affect IPV victims and revictimization.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [4];
Q3 = [2];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [1];
Q6 = [1].
Moderating Effects of Social Networks on Gender-Based Violence and Intimate Partner Violence Among North Korean Refugee Women
Objective: This study investigated the relationship between gender-based violence (GBV) experienced before and during migration and increased risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) among North Korean (NK) refugee women after resettlement in South Korea. We also assessed the mitigating role of two types of social networks (i.e., bonding and bridging) in the relationship between GBV and IPV. Bonding networks (i.e., relationships with people sharing similar backgrounds and experiences) have been found to protect IPV victims by providing them with emotional support, and bridging networks (i.e., extended connections with people from different backgrounds) to help victims with their response strategies to IPV. Method: A cross-sectional survey was administered to NK refugee women living in South Korea (N = 212). Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that past GBV exposure was significantly associated with current IPV exposure. Both types of social networks significantly attenuated the relationship between GBV and IPV. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that a history of GBV victimization could increase risk of IPV from current partners, as male partners of NK refugee women with experiences of GBV might perceive past sexual victimization as a disgrace and perpetrate violence during conflicts. However, IPV victimization might be prevented by enhancing social networks. Bonding networks might provide emotional support for NK refugee women, and bridging networks might help them find necessary resources and information to respond to the violence. Thus, violence prevention and intervention approaches should consider the extent to which bonding and bridging social networks affect IPV victims and revictimization.