<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"TO FLEE OR NOT TO FLEE The conflicting messages of Soviet wartime propaganda and the Holocaust, 1941."
Abstract:"After the outbreak of the Soviet-German war, Soviet media institutions fulfilled their major prewar role as a propaganda tool. The portrayal of German anti-Jewish policies fell largely within their functions if only because such reports could not be authenticated as long as the enemy remained in control of Soviet territories. Therefore, they were likely regarded by many Soviet people as merely one more Soviet propaganda spin. Among them was a Jewish family, the Ginsburgs, from the South Russian city of Rostov-on-Don. Soviet media can be credited in no small measure with disseminating awareness of the Germans' real intentions towards the Jews that ultimately reverberated to the Ginsburgs and incited some of them to evacuate while others considered leaving. However, the critical information on the proximity of the German forces was frequently unavailable or distorted. The impact of the messages emanating from the Soviet media depended on whether they accorded with the mindset of their consumers, such as the Ginsburgs, and whether these consumers were able and willing to verify media content from other sources, mainly rumors coming from refugees. In cognizance of the family's fear of Soviet censors and their desire not to upset each other overall, one can say that the penetration of Soviet media notions is noticeable in 1941.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [0];
Q2 = [4,5];
Q3 = [1];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
TO FLEE OR NOT TO FLEE The conflicting messages of Soviet wartime propaganda and the Holocaust, 1941
After the outbreak of the Soviet-German war, Soviet media institutions fulfilled their major prewar role as a propaganda tool. The portrayal of German anti-Jewish policies fell largely within their functions if only because such reports could not be authenticated as long as the enemy remained in control of Soviet territories. Therefore, they were likely regarded by many Soviet people as merely one more Soviet propaganda spin. Among them was a Jewish family, the Ginsburgs, from the South Russian city of Rostov-on-Don. Soviet media can be credited in no small measure with disseminating awareness of the Germans' real intentions towards the Jews that ultimately reverberated to the Ginsburgs and incited some of them to evacuate while others considered leaving. However, the critical information on the proximity of the German forces was frequently unavailable or distorted. The impact of the messages emanating from the Soviet media depended on whether they accorded with the mindset of their consumers, such as the Ginsburgs, and whether these consumers were able and willing to verify media content from other sources, mainly rumors coming from refugees. In cognizance of the family's fear of Soviet censors and their desire not to upset each other overall, one can say that the penetration of Soviet media notions is noticeable in 1941.