<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Political Leadership and Public Policy Debate in the 2016 Australian Federal Election."
Abstract:"In all democracies, elections offer vital opportunities for engaged discussion over current problems and desirable policy responses. In the 2016 Australian Federal Election, debate centred on whether the conservative Coalition or the Labor Party could be most trusted in managing the economy. The Coalition emphasised 'jobs and growth', driven by support to business. The Labor Party emphasised placing 'people first', claiming sustained economic growth requires enabling all people to participate effectively in society and the economy. Playing to voter concerns over their personal finances, political leaders mostly debated the economy, tax policy, and health care funding. We review the debate on those policy issues. We also discuss three issues that received muted attention, despite their broader significance - climate change, treatment of asylum seekers, and marriage equality. The electoral policy debate and the resulting configuration of Australia's Parliament reveal a conspicuous lack of effective policy leadership. The demands of tactical politics in contemporary Australia have drawn leaders' attention away from governing for the long term. Further, current political leaders have difficulty forging parliamentary consensus, and effectively engaging the Australian public on the policy challenges facing the country. We discuss the implications of this situation.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Political Leadership and Public Policy Debate in the 2016 Australian Federal Election
In all democracies, elections offer vital opportunities for engaged discussion over current problems and desirable policy responses. In the 2016 Australian Federal Election, debate centred on whether the conservative Coalition or the Labor Party could be most trusted in managing the economy. The Coalition emphasised 'jobs and growth', driven by support to business. The Labor Party emphasised placing 'people first', claiming sustained economic growth requires enabling all people to participate effectively in society and the economy. Playing to voter concerns over their personal finances, political leaders mostly debated the economy, tax policy, and health care funding. We review the debate on those policy issues. We also discuss three issues that received muted attention, despite their broader significance - climate change, treatment of asylum seekers, and marriage equality. The electoral policy debate and the resulting configuration of Australia's Parliament reveal a conspicuous lack of effective policy leadership. The demands of tactical politics in contemporary Australia have drawn leaders' attention away from governing for the long term. Further, current political leaders have difficulty forging parliamentary consensus, and effectively engaging the Australian public on the policy challenges facing the country. We discuss the implications of this situation.