<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Humanitarian Capture, Solidarity's Excess: Affect, Experience, and the Mobile Commons in Migrant Solidarity."
Abstract:"This article focuses on the relation of affect and the mobile commons by drawing on the case of migrant solidarity in the Spanish state during the so-called refugee crisis. I begin by portraying the context of emergence of migrant solidarity in Catalonia and its relation to the humanitarian affective governmentality (HAG) of both migrants and their supporters-a regime that redirects affects in collective organising to reinforce European borders. Despite these attempts of co-option, however, I argue that migrant solidarity may exceed the capture from HAG. Excess refers, in a first instance, to the role of affects in the social production of experience; and in a second instance, to how collective organising feeds the virtuality that freedom of movement is still possible. I thus argue for the consideration of affects, understood as that emerging in the encounters between bodies, as part of the mobile commons.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:
Q1 = [1];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [0];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [0].
Humanitarian Capture, Solidarity's Excess: Affect, Experience, and the Mobile Commons in Migrant Solidarity
This article focuses on the relation of affect and the mobile commons by drawing on the case of migrant solidarity in the Spanish state during the so-called refugee crisis. I begin by portraying the context of emergence of migrant solidarity in Catalonia and its relation to the humanitarian affective governmentality (HAG) of both migrants and their supporters-a regime that redirects affects in collective organising to reinforce European borders. Despite these attempts of co-option, however, I argue that migrant solidarity may exceed the capture from HAG. Excess refers, in a first instance, to the role of affects in the social production of experience; and in a second instance, to how collective organising feeds the virtuality that freedom of movement is still possible. I thus argue for the consideration of affects, understood as that emerging in the encounters between bodies, as part of the mobile commons.