Evaluating pytorch models: `with torch.no_grad` vs `model.eval()`
When I want to evaluate the performance of my model on the validation set, is it preferred to use with torch.no_grad: or model.eval()?

TL;DR:
Use both. They do different things, and have different scopes.

with torch.no_grad - disables tracking of gradients in autograd.
model.eval() changes the forward() behaviour of the module it is called upon
eg, it disables dropout and has batch norm use the entire population statistics


with torch.no_grad
The torch.autograd.no_grad documentation  says:

Context-manager that disabled [sic] gradient calculation.


Disabling gradient calculation is useful for inference, when you are sure that you will not call Tensor.backward(). It will reduce memory consumption for computations that would otherwise have requires_grad=True. In this mode, the result of every computation will have requires_grad=False, even when the inputs have requires_grad=True.

model.eval()
The nn.Module.eval documentation says:

Sets the module in evaluation mode.


This has any effect only on certain modules. See documentations of particular modules for details of their behaviors in training/evaluation mode, if they are affected, e.g. Dropout, BatchNorm, etc.


The creator of pytorch said the documentation should be updated to suggest the usage of both, and I raised the pull request.
