Roe Handbook Eng May 2011 Print Run
Transféré par atitoxavier
enregistrerEnregistrer Roe Handbook Eng May 2011 Print Run pour plus tard
ROE-HANDBOOK-ENGLISH.pdf
Affidavit- Change of Signature
PR Fact Finding Report April 18 2012
doc.pdf
The Registration (Strata Titles) (Amendment) Regulations, 2010
ALBD_SO_120750
CORPBANKPO_220731
EFF: Tab P-05
14_07_200_3022577
BOBPO_403087
pdf_save
Press Release PSAA Trustees 3-14-15
Buttrey Jessica 0926
Notice: Filing of Plats of Survey: Bowie Resources, LLC.; COC-072168; Colorado
Joseph H. Bieluch, Jr. v. Bernard Sullivan, Commissioner of Public Safety, I/o, 999 F.2d 666, 2d Cir. (1993)
Commissioners April 4 Agenda
United States v. Madrid, 10th Cir. (2015)
SANREMO HANDBOOK
Prepared under the auspices of the International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Sanremo Drafting Team Commander Alan Cole United Kingdom Royal Navy Major Phillip Drew Canadian Forces Captain Rob McLaughlin Royal Australian Navy Professor Dennis Mandsager Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy (Retired) U.S. Naval War College Editor and Project Coordinator
Sanremo, November 2009
This handbook does not necessarily represent the views of either the International Institute of Humanitarian Law or the government of any member of the drafting team
FOREWORD The Sanremo Handbook on Rules of Engagement is intended to continue in the same vein as previous well-known Sanremo publications such as the Sanremo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, published in 1995 and the Sanremo Manual on the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, published in 2006. Published by the Institute as a working tool, the booklet is not intended to state the official opinions or positions of individual governments nor of specific international organisations on the different issues considered. Its only aim is to guide the reader and in particular the participants in the military courses of the International Institute of Humanitarian Law through the intricacies of the generally accepted and widespread concept of rules of engagement. The Handbook reflects the results of a three-year project initiated by Professor Dennis Mandsager of the United States Naval War College, with the full support of the Institute, who identified the need for a common Rules of Engagement reference that could be used by any nation for training and/or operations. The Handbook was informed by several workshops conducted at the International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Sanremo, plus numerous multinational exercises and courses, which drew input from highly qualified experts from different regions of the world. The Handbook, in its current form, reflects best practice from nations across the globe. The text has been prepared by Commander Alan Cole RN, Major Phillip Drew, Canadian Forces, Captain Rob McLaughlin, RAN and Professor Dennis Mandsager, Captain, JAGC, US Navy (Ret.). The final draft has been reviewed by a team of Council members of the Institute, composed of Brigadier General Erwin Dahinden, Dr. Baldwin de Vidts, Professor Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Professor Marie Jacobsson, Dr. Michael Meyer and Professor Michel Veuthey, with the cooperation of Colonel Darren Stewart, Director of the Military Department of the Institute. There are no other Handbooks of its type in existence; it has been designed so that it can be used by any nation or group of nations without reference to security caveats or restrictions. Of course this was always the intent, to provide a tool that could be used to facilitate and enhance multinational cooperation and mutual understanding while ensuring that military forces are in compliance with national security and policy concerns. As the political control on the use of force and with that, the use of Rules of Engagement to regulate the conduct of armed forces by individual nations, alliances and coalitions around the world continue to grow, so too the need to be able to train on and understand Rules of Engagement similarly gains importance. It is essential that a clear understanding exists that whilst Rules of Engagement are often a mix of military and political policy requirements, these must be bounded by extant international and domestic legal parameters. Such legal constraints may never be exceeded, but are quite often restricted further by the effect of Rules of Engagement. Too often national or multinational security classifications mean that the publication and sharing of Rules of Engagement experience and best practice is problematic. The ability for militaries to share their experiences as well as for academics,
students and the public to consider the subject is critical in order to promote awareness of the practical implementation of International Humanitarian Law through Rules of Engagement. The new Handbook will meet the requirements of our military courses, but it will be equally available to other interested institutions and parties. It is my sincere hope that the Handbook will find a use either in those areas of the world where Rules of Engagement doctrine does not currently exist or as a vehicle to aid in the creation of realistic and meaningful exercises at the national and multi-national level. The Handbook is intended to be of assistance to those working both at the strategic level, to aid in the preparation of clear and unambiguous Rules of Engagement, as well as for those involved in their implementation in order that Rules of Engagement are issued in a language that is easily understood and that assists military personnels ability to accomplish the mission. Given that this is an area which is constantly changing, reflecting the nature and manner in which nations participate in military operations, we fully expect users of the Handbook to come up with suggestions to refine and hone the practice articulated in the Handbook in future editions of the text. I should very much like to thank Professor Dennis Mandsager, who was the originator of the initiative, the Drafting Committee of the Handbook, as well as all the members of the Institute (including Professor Natalino Ronzitti and Vice Admiral Ferdinando Sanfelice di Monteforte) who, on a personal basis, gave useful comments and suggestions. Finally, my thanks go to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Its substantial financial contribution facilitated not only the fast publication of the Handbook and its translation into other languages, but also allows the IIHL to distribute the Handbook to all interested students and institutions.
Ambassador Maurizio Moreno President, IIHL
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HUMANITARIAN LAW
PRESIDENT Ambassador Maurizio MORENO (Italy) VICE-PRESIDENTS: Prof. Michel VEUTHEY(Switzerland) Associate Professor, University of Nice, Sophia-Antipolis Prof. Fausto POCAR (Italy) Past President, Judge, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, The Hague Dr. Baldwin DE VIDTS (Belgium) Former Legal Advisor to the Secretary-General of NATO, Brussels COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dr. Mohammed AL-HADID (Jordan) Former Chairman of the Standing Commission of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva President, Jordan National Red Crescent Society Prof. Mario BETTATI (France) Professor of International Law, University of Paris Brigadier General Erwin DAHINDEN (Switzerland) Chief, International Relations, Armed Forces, Bern Prof. Yoram DINSTEIN (Israel) Emeritus Professor, University of Tel Aviv President of the United Nations Association of Israel Prof. Jacques FORSTER (Switzerland) Emeritus Professor, Institute for Advanced Studies in Development, Geneva Chairman, Foundation Board of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID), Geneva Prof. Dr. Wolff HEINTSCHEL VON HEINEGG (Germany) Head of the Faculty of Jurisprudence, Viadrina University, Frankfurt Associate Professor Marie JACOBSSON (Sweden) Principal Legal Adviser on International Law, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm Member of the UN International Law Commission Dr. Michael A. MEYER (United Kingdom) Head of the International Law Office, British Red Cross, London Dr. Ndioro NDIAYE (Senegal) President, Alliance for Migration, Leadership and Development, Dakar Judge Hisashi OWADA (Japan) President, International Court of Justice, The Hague Prof. John SHATTUCK (USA) President and Rector, Central European University, Budapest Ambassador Laura THOMPSON (Costa Rica) Deputy Director General, International Organization for Migration, Geneva MUNICIPALITY OF SANREMO ITALIAN RED CROSS
Dr. Stefania BALDINI Secretary iv General Col. Darren STEWART (British Army) Director Military Department
The U.S. Naval War College, like many similar schools, conducts unclassified and classified research, teaching, war games, and conference and has an international student body. When the topic involves rules of engagement (ROE) and when the participants represent multiple nations, meaningful discussion is problematic. Participants often arrive with either little knowledge of ROE, or with knowledge of a classified national set of ROE that is not releasable to other nations, or with knowledge of a set of classified multinational ROE that is not releasable outside a coalition. The goal of this ROE Handbook project was to alleviate that problem by developing a realistic, comprehensive, and unclassified ROE Handbook that is usable by all nations for training, education, exercises, war games, and real world operations. The first step in the drafting process was to identify counterparts in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom, with whom the College already had a close working relationship, to join the drafting team. The second step was to join forces with the International Institute of Humanitarian Law (IIHL) and its large international student body to test Handbook drafts in teaching and workshop environments. The challenges for the drafting team were considerable. Many questioned the feasibility of developing an ROE that would be acceptable to the international community. Nations have different treaty obligations, different views on international law, different views on policy, and different views on the authority and responsibility of commanders. Additionally, almost all reviewers believe that real world ROE must be classified. The drafting team produced multiple drafts, which were critiqued at many varied venues, including two multinational ROE workshops and two naval operations courses held at IIHL. The result at each event was robust ROE play. After three years of drafting and testing, the IIHL Council approved publication of the Handbook in September of 2009. The format of the Handbook is unique in that, in addition to ROE measures, it includes formats for a wide range of ROE-related matters, including ROE cards, warnings, responses to warnings, and other matters. The drafting team recognises that many nations have their own formats for these items; however, many do not, and students often do not have access. The Handbook contemplates that, in a multinational force, higher authority in each nation will approve ROE for its forces and that each multinational partner will comply with national law and policy. Accordingly, the Handbook provides multiple, and often inconsistent, options for ROE measures. Consensus on each measure is not critical. Sharing ROE information with the multinational force commander, however, is critical. The drafters request that users of the Handbook share constructive criticism, questions, and comments, as well as any lessons-learned from ROE exercises. Please email them to sanremo@iihl.org Dennis Mandsager U.S. Naval War College
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The drafting team expresses its thanks to the International Institute of Humanitarian Law and to the countless students, workshop participants, and counterparts who have used the Handbook and have provided constructive criticism and recommendations for improvement. Alan Cole thanks Commodore Neil Brown, Royal Navy for his support both through making him available from his staff and for his own personal contribution notably in the drafting of sections related to pre-planned targeting. He also thanks Captain Andrew Jameson Royal Navy who contributed on maritime security matters. Rob McLaughlin could not have been involved in this project without the strong support of Rear Admiral Allan du Toit, Major General David Morrison, and Commodore Trevor Jones, to whom he expresses his thanks. He also expresses his thanks to the many operations and legal officers within the ADF, and in particular, Wing Commander Ian Henderson, for their reviews and comments. Phillip Drew would like to extend his thanks to the Commander of the Canadian Defence Academy, Major-General Daniel Gosselin and the Judge Advocate General of the Canadian Forces, Brigadier-General Kenneth Watkin, for their strong support from the inception of this project through to its completion. He would also like to thank his colleagues who assisted him by providing advice and guidance, particularly Colonel Kirby Abbott, Lieutenant-Colonel Tim Bishop and Commander Mary Gardam. Dennis Mandsager thanks the drafting team for the many hours of writing, debating, negotiating, and compromising that went into the development of this Handbook. For their support of this project, he thanks the leadership of the Naval War College, including former and current Presidents, Rear Admiral Jacob Shuford, USN (Retired) and Rear Admiral James P. (Phil) Wisecup, USN, former and current Provosts, Professor James Giblin and Ambassador Mary Ann Peters, and Dean of the Center for Naval Warfare Studies, Professor Robert (Barney) Rubel. Finally, he thanks his colleagues in the Naval War Colleges International Law Department and Naval Reserve International Law Unit, all of whom were key players on the team that produced the Handbook.
Alan Cole Phillip Drew Rob McLaughlin Dennis Mandsager
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY PRESIDENT, IIHL IIHL COUNCIL AND OFFICERS PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF ROE PART I PART II PART III PART IV PART V PART VI ANNEX A INTRODUCTION SELF-DEFENCE THE USE OF FORCE DURING OPERATIONS POLICY DIRECTION TO MILITARY AUTHORITIES DRAFTING METHODOLOGY ROE PROCEDURES GUIDANCE ON PLANNING AND STAFFING Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Planning Procedures Environment-Specific Guidance 2.1 Land Operations 2.2 Maritime Operations 2.3 Air Operations 2.4 Outer Space Operations 2.5 Cyberspace Operations Appendix 3 Task-Specific Planning Considerations 3.1 Peace Operations 3.2 Non-Combatant Evacuation Operations 3.3 Humanitarian Assistance / Disaster Relief 3.4 Assistance to Civil Authorities 3.5 Maritime Interdiction Operations 17 ii iv v vi vii ix 1 3 4 6 6 7 9 10 12
Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 ANNEX B ANNEX C
Guidance on Hostile Intent Escalation of Force in Self-Defence Targeting and ROE
COMPENDIUM OF ROE FORMATS FOR ROE AND ROE-RELATED MATERIALS Appendix 1 Appendix 2 ROE Annex to OPORDER ROE Request (ROEREQ), ROE AUTHORISATION (ROEAUTH), and ROE Implementation (ROEIMP) Messages ROE Matrix for Multinational Operations ROE Cards Maritime Warning Zone Announcements Requests for Identification and Warnings Responses to Queries, Warnings and Challenges at Sea
Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7
ANNEX D
TABLE OF ROE This table sets out the ROE Series headings found in the Compendium of ROE at Annex B to this Handbook. The Compendium of ROE contains the specific rules and notes that are to be used for drafting ROE. GROUP 10-19: USE OF FORCE IN THE DEFENCE OF SELF AND OTHERS Series 10 11 12 13 14-19 Use of Force in Individual Self-Defence Use of Force in Unit Self-Defence Use of Force for the Protection of Others Use of Force in National Self-Defence SPARE
GROUP 20-29: MISSION ACCOMPLISHMENT Series 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28-29 Use of Force for Mission Accomplishment Protection of Freedom of Movement of Persons Prevention of Interference with Ships and Aircraft Warning Shots Disabling Fire Search and Detention of Persons Use of Force to Secure the Release of Persons Indirect Fire (Unobserved Indirect Fire and Observed Indirect Fire) SPARE
GROUP 30-39: TARGETING IN ARMED CONFLICT
Series 30 31 32 33-39 Engagement of Military Objectives Including Hostile Forces Identification of Targets Neutrals SPARE
GROUP 40-49: OPERATIONS RELATED TO PROPERTY Series 40 41 42 43-49 Use of Force to Protect Property Protection of Vital/Mission Essential/Specified Property Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property SPARE
GROUP 50-59: GEOGRAPHIC POSITIONING Series 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions Ground Reconnaissance Aerial Reconnaissance Relative Positioning of Force Units Exercising in the Presence of a Potential Adversary Diversions Use of Obstacles and Barriers Zones Freedom of Navigation SPARE
GROUP 60-69: WARNINGS, HARASSMENT, SHADOWING, ILLUMINATION Series 60 61 62 63 64-69 Warnings Harassment Shadowing, Surveillance, and Marking Sensors and Illumination SPARE
GROUP 70-79: CARRYING OF WEAPONS Series 70 71-79 Authority to Carry Weapons SPARE
GROUP 80-89: LAND MINES, CLUSTER MUNITIONS AND BOOBY TRAPS Series 80 81 82 83-89 Use of Land Mines Use of Cluster Munitions Use of Booby Traps SPARE
GROUP 90-99: MARITIME OPERATIONS Series 90 91 92 93 Maritime Law Enforcement Submarine Contacts Naval Mines Boardings
Suppression of Piracy SPARE
GROUP 100-109: AIR OPERATIONS Series 100 101 102 103-109 Use of Air to Surface Munitions Use of Air to Sub-surface Munitions Air to Air Engagements SPARE
GROUP 110-119: ASSISTANCE TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES Series 110 111 112 113-119 Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, including Law Enforcement Search, Detention and Arrest of Persons Treatment of Detained and Arrested Persons SPARE
GROUP 120-129: CROWD AND RIOT CONTROL 120 121 122 123-129 Crowd and Riot Control Riot Control Agents Riot Control Munitions/Water Cannons SPARE
GROUP 130-139: INFORMATION OPERATIONS Series
130 131 132 133 134-139
Electronic Warfare Measures Computer Network Operations Psychological Operations Military Deception SPARE
GROUP 140-149: OUTER SPACE OPERATIONS Series 140 141 142-149 Interference With Satellite Communications Neutralization/Destruction of Satellites SPARE
GROUPS 150 PLUS: SPARE
PART I: INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 1. The purpose of this Handbook is to assist in the drafting of Rules of Engagement (ROE) and related legal and operational guidance for use in training, exercises, war games, and operations. The Handbook is not a manual on the Law of Armed Conflict. The Handbook takes into account the requirement to identify and manage the respective legal and policy positions of nations participating in a multinational operation and promotes an understanding of national ROE policies. The Handbook also sets out suggested ROE for a number of selected environments and tasks, and procedures for approving and implementing ROE in single service, joint, or multinational operations. STRUCTURE OF THE HANDBOOK 2. This Handbook adopts the following structure: a. Parts I to VI provide an introduction to the Handbook, the key legal considerations impacting upon the use of force, the concept of self-defence, the policy factors that influence the development of ROE, the ROE methodology adopted in this Handbook, and ROE procedures. b. Annex A provides guidance on the planning and drafting of ROE, specific guidance on ROE for selected operational environments and operational tasks, guidance on hostile intent and the escalation of force in self-defence, and information on the relationship between targeting and ROE. c. Annex B provides a menu of ROE provisions that may be tailored as necessary to accomplish various missions. d. Annex C and its Appendices provides sample ROE and ROE-related documents. e. Annex D provides definitions for a number of terms used in this Handbook. These terms are italicized wherever they appear (e.g. opposed boarding), thus indicating that reference should be made to the definition in Annex D. DEFINITION AND STATUS 3. ROE are issued by competent authorities and assist in the delineation of the circumstances and limitations within which military forces may be employed to achieve their objectives. ROE appear in a variety of forms in national military doctrines, including execute orders, deployment orders, operational plans, or standing directives. Whatever their form, they provide authorisation for and/or limits on, among other things, the use of force, the positioning and posturing of forces, and the employment of certain specific capabilities. In some nations, ROE have the status of guidance to military forces; in other nations, ROE are lawful commands.
ROE are not used to assign missions or tasks nor are they used to give tactical instructions. Missions and tasks are assigned through Operations orders and other similar instruments of command and control. APPLICABLE LAW AND POLICY 4. International Law. The conduct of military operations is governed by international law, including the law of armed conflict (LOAC) (also referred to as the law of war, or international humanitarian law), and applicable international human rights law. Both nations and individuals are obliged to comply with LOAC. All nations are obliged to train their forces to comply with LOAC and with other provisions of international law that impact upon military operations. This Handbook is intended to facilitate the creation of ROE to provide for the judicious use of force in compliance with international law. Nations are bound by Geneva Law and Hague Law. Nations may have different treaty obligations and differing interpretations and/or application of both treaty and customary international law. In multinational operations these differences need to be identified and factored into the planning and conduct of operations. 5. National Laws. The armed forces of each nation must comply with their own national laws. For example, the national laws of some nations may restrict the ability of forces to use force, in particular deadly force, to protect others or to defend property. Accordingly, some nations may issue restrictions or amplifying instructions to supplement the ROE for multinational operations. To the greatest extent possible, such restrictions or instructions should be shared with multinational partners. It is particularly important to ensure that commanders operating in multinational operations are aware of any such restrictions so that they may employ forces in an efficient and effective manner. 6. National Policy. In the same way that nations may have different legal positions on certain issues, the planning and conduct of military operations must take into account differing national policy positions. Some military options, available under both international and national law, may not come within national policy intent, either generally or with respect to a specific operation. For example, some nations in some circumstances may limit permissible levels of incidental injury or collateral damage to levels below that acceptable under LOAC, while others may not allow their military to conduct law enforcement activities. In multinational operations, such policy differences need to be identified and factored into the planning and conduct of operations. This Handbook allows for the creation of ROE that provide for the conduct of operations in compliance with national policy.
7. Multinational Operations. In multi-national operations participating nations should operate under coherent ROE arrangements. Policy and legal differences can lead to different ROE among the members of a multinational force. Different ROE can be a source of friction in conducting operations. Problems of this sort are best resolved through negotiations rather than through a process that leads to an ROE that reflects the lowest common denominator. If there are irreconcilable differences in ROE, those differences should be shared with other members of the force whenever feasible.
PART II: SELF-DEFENCE 8. Categories of Self-Defence. International law and the domestic laws of all nations recognise a right of self-defence, which is the use of force to defend against attack or imminent attack. Self-defence is available in all situations, including armed conflict. National laws differ on the definition and content of the right of self-defence. As a consequence, individuals and units will exercise this right in accordance with their respective national law. For some nations, self-defence is not governed by ROE. For some nations, the terms hostile act and hostile intent are related to mission-accomplishment, rather than selfdefence. The Handbook has adopted what the drafters view as the more generally accepted view, while recognizing that nations may have different approaches. In any event, the Handbook is intended for use by all nations. For the purposes of this Handbook, the right of self-defence is considered on four levels. a. Individual self-defence. This refers to the right of an individual to defend himself or herself (and in some cases other individuals) from an attack or imminent attack. Some nations permit commanders to limit individual self-defence in the same way as for unit self-defence (See Annex B, series 10). b. Unit self-defence. Unit commanders have the right to defend their unit and other units from their nation in the face of an attack or imminent attack. For some nations, the concept of unit self-defence is both a right and an obligation; whereas for others the concept is only a right. Some nations permit the right of unit self-defence to be limited by orders from higher authority. Unit self-defence may be extended to units and individuals from other nations when authorised by the applicable ROE. (See Annex B, series 11). c. Protection of Others. This refers to the right to defend specified persons (who are not part of the Force) against an attack or imminent attack. For some nations, the right of individual self-defence or unit self-defence may not include the right to use force to defend another nations citizens. (See Annex B, series 12). d. National self-defence. As recognised in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, refers to the right of a nation to defend itself against armed attack, and for most nations, the threat of imminent armed attack. (See Annex B, series 13). Decisions on whether or not national self-defence will be invoked are retained at the highest levels of governmental or executive authority. 9. Hostile Act and Hostile Intent. For the purposes of this Handbook, the right to use force in self-defence arises in response to a hostile act (attack) and/or demonstrated hostile intent (threat of imminent attack). Appendices 4 and 5 to Annex A provide guidance on the determination of hostile intent and the magnitude and duration of force that may be employed in self-defence. Higher authority may provide mission-specific guidance on indicators of hostile act and hostile intent. 10. Use of Force in Self-Defence. Subject to any limitations promulgated in ROE (either series 10 or 11), all necessary and proportional means and actions may be used in selfdefence. Where time and operational circumstances permit, military forces should warn the threatening entity in order to give it an opportunity to withdraw or cease its threatening
actions. Military forces are permitted to use force in self-defence only if non-forceful alternatives to prevent or deter the attack or imminent attack: a. b. c. Have been exhausted, Are unavailable, or Are deemed insufficient to defend forces in those circumstances.
The use of force is generally authorised so long as the hostile act or hostile intent continues. The use of force must be proportional, which means that the nature, duration, and scope of force used should not exceed what is required. (Note: The concept of proportionality in self-defence should not be confused with the concept of proportionality in international armed conflict, which is related to attempts to minimize collateral damage.) 11. Pursuit. Self-defence, unit self-defence, protection of others, and national selfdefence include the authority to pursue and engage forces that continue to demonstrate hostile intent. ROE may limit the extent to which pursuit is authorised, depending upon the military and political situation. Pursuit in self-defence should be distinguished from hot pursuit, which, for the purposes of this Handbook, is a measure that applies only in a maritime law enforcement context and is defined in customary international law and in Article 111 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention. 12. Relationship between Self-Defence and Mission Accomplishment ROE. Individuals and units have the right to defend against attack and imminent attack. As a general rule, ROE issued for a mission do not limit this right. Because national laws and policies differ, there will not always be consistency in a multinational force as to when the right to use force in self-defence ends and the use of force for mission accomplishment begins. Inconsistencies should be clarified in the planning process.
PART III: THE USE OF FORCE DURING OPERATIONS 13. Broadly speaking, during peacetime, the use of force is permitted in self-defence, in the exercise of law enforcement authority, and to accomplish operations or missions specifically authorised by a higher national authority or other governing body, such as the U.N. Security Council. a. It is universally recognised that individuals and units have a right to defend themselves against attack or imminent attack. Nevertheless, because national laws and policies differ with respect to the application of self-defence to military operations, Series 10, 11, 12, and 13 of Annex B provide specific ROE intended to clarify the extent of the authorisations granted for the application of force in selfdefence. For example, some nations permit commanders to restrict the exercise of the right of individual self-defence and/or unit self-defence, while others do not. b. Where the use of force is not justified by self-defence, but is nonetheless necessary for accomplishment of an assigned military mission, reasonable force may
be exercised within the constraints of the relevant national and international law. Series 20 to 140 of Annex B provide measures for mission accomplishment. c. Deadly force can be used against persons posing an imminent threat to life. National views on other circumstances in which deadly force is permitted vary widely among nations. The Handbook provides multiple ROE measures, the use of which will depend upon national laws and policies. 14. During armed conflict, and in addition to self-defence, commanders may be authorised to engage an enemy in accordance with LOAC. a. The extent to which different aspects of LOAC might apply depends in the first instance on whether a conflict is an international or non-international armed conflict. Generally, the political leadership of a nation determines the characterization of an armed conflict to be applied by its armed forces. This characterization is based on a legal analysis of the factual situation. When planning operations and crafting ROE for multinational operations, senior commanders and their legal advisors need to be aware of how other nations characterize the conflict, as those characterizations will affect which LOAC framework is applied by those nations. b. In international armed conflicts situations, only combatants (unless hors de combat) and civilians directly participating in hostilities and military objectives may be the object of attack. In non-international armed conflicts situations, only fighters (unless hors de combat) and civilians directly participating in hostilities and military objectives may be the object of attack. c. Commanders, planners, and legal advisors must recognise the fact that not all nations are parties to the same LOAC treaties. Further, even those who are parties to the same treaties do not all have the same interpretations of the law embodied in those treaties. However, ROE language is generally crafted to reflect a number of recurring LOAC rules and principles concerning the use of force: i. Military necessity - the requirement whereby a belligerent has the right to apply any measures that are required to bring about the successful conclusion of a military operation and which are not forbidden by LOAC. ii. Distinction - the requirement to distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and to direct operations only against combatants and military objectives. iii. Proportionality - the prohibition of an attack that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. iv. Humanity - the prohibition of the infliction of suffering, injury or destruction not actually necessary for the accomplishment of legitimate military purposes.
Precaution - in the conduct of military operations, constant care shall taken to spare the civilian population, civilians and civilian objects.
Weapon prohibitions - the prohibition of weapons that cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.
Detailed discussion of LOAC is beyond the scope of this ROE Handbook.
PART IV: POLICY DIRECTION TO MILITARY AUTHORITIES 16. Higher authority within a nation or in a multinational force will provide direction on the goals to be achieved when undertaking a military mission. This may include direction on force posture as well as authorisations or limitations on the scope of action a commander may take to accomplish the mission. Policy direction from government, including conclusions of legal analysis, may limit the operational freedom of military commanders and prevent them taking all the actions available to them under the law. Policy direction does not however provide a legal authority for use of force in the conduct of operations where such use of force is outside the law. 17. The ROE authorised for a mission will typically include specific instructions regarding the use of force. In addition to self-defence, ROE will therefore generally reflect multiple components, including political guidance from higher authorities, the tactical considerations of the specific mission, and LOAC. Succinct and unambiguous rules are essential. 18. Political leadership may also provide narrative guidance on its policy aims and objectives so as to enable commanders to respond appropriately as a situation develops. Such guidance should be explained in plain language, and supporting ROE should reflect this guidance within the context of the mission. Such guidance may change as mission objectives and ROE authorisations mature to reflect changes in policy and mission context.
PART V: DRAFTING METHODOLOGY 19. The ROE in this Handbook are drafted as a series of prohibitions, restrictions, and permissions set out in the Compendium of Rules at Annex B. This Handbook adopts a restrictive approach to authorisation. This means that if an ROE measure is not addressed in the ROE, commanders must assume that they have no authority (beyond individual selfdefence and unit self-defence) to carry out that action. In respect of the exercise of freedoms of navigation and overflight (e.g. high seas freedoms, innocent passage, transit passage, and assistance entry), specific ROE provisions are not required unless those rights are to be restricted. Nevertheless, measures that either authorise or prohibit such actions are included to facilitate clarity. 20. Annex B provides a menu of ROE options that may be tailored to a specific mission. The nature of the operation(s) may dictate that planners or commanders propose rules not listed in this Handbook. In such cases, the spare rules in the relevant series or a new
series may be employed. Sample ROE for an operation are contained in Appendix 1 to Annex C. 21. When the term SPECIFY is included in the ROE measure, the term refers to a need to add specific parameters that focus the application of the rule. Such parameters might be in relation to ranges, particular weapon types, specific nationalities, or certain actions or conduct. Accordingly, where this term appears, specific words must be inserted into the ROE measure to clarify and tailor the meaning of the provision. 22. When the ROE authorise the use of deadly force, this authorises the use of all lesser degrees of force permitted by law, up to and including deadly force. The actual tactics, techniques and procedures for applying force or utilizing non-deadly force will vary based upon factors such as environment, weapons systems available, the prevailing threat, and applicable law. The tactical employment of approved ROE is a matter of command judgment. 23. Specific rules may be retained for activation by a specified command authority. This means that the rule is only able to be used upon specific positive approval by the specified commander. This approval will generally be sought and granted by the quickest appropriate means and confirmed formally. Furthermore, such approval may be on a case by case basis, or given for a specified period of time, geographical area, or mission. Retention of a rule is indicated by amplification to the rule that states the approval level. The format adopted in this Handbook is as follows: AMPN: This rule is retained by (SPECIFY level of authority e.g. Force Commander). 24. While commanders may restrict the use of issued ROE measures, they cannot authorise their forces to exceed them. Commanders at all levels who are uncertain about the suitability of ROE must immediately request a change or clarification. Additionally, if the ROE are considered unclear or insufficient, commanders must immediately seek clarification from higher authority.
PART VI: ROE PROCEDURES 25. Approval. ROE are authorised either by national authorities or by the governing body of an international organisation in accordance with its procedures and with national agreement (e.g. UN). ROE are developed and staffed as part of the operational planning process, either parallel to or as part of the development of the relevant operation plan (OPLAN) or operation order (OPORDER). They may be included in these documents or published separately by message or otherwise. The OPLAN or OPORDER will also set out the geographical area (Area of Operations) to which the ROE apply. Some nations include their request for mission specific ROE directly in the draft OPORDER. 26. Review. ROE must be continuously reviewed to ensure that they are clear and lawful, that they are sufficient to address the requirements of the mission, and that they provide the commander with the necessary powers to deal effectively with the threat. Message formats for requesting ROE (ROEREQ), for authorising ROE (ROEAUTH), and for implementing ROE (ROEIMP) are provided in Appendix 2 to Annex C.
27. Security. While ROE for training and exercises often may be unclassified, the ROE for actual operations are generally classified at the same level as the OPLAN or OPORDER.
Annex A
GUIDANCE ON PLANNING AND STAFFING 1. This Annex provides recommended procedures for the development, staffing and publication of ROE. 2. The following appendices are included: Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Planning Procedures Environment-Specific Guidance Task-Specific Planning Considerations Guidance on Hostile Intent Escalation of Force in Self-defence Targeting and ROE
Appendix 1 to Annex A
PLANNING PROCEDURES 1. The development and implementation of effective ROE is critical to mission accomplishment. This Appendix provides suggested guidelines for incorporating ROE development into operational planning. 2. ROE are authorised by national authorities (individually or collectively) or sometimes by the governing body of a multinational force operating under the umbrella of an international organisation (e.g. UN, NATO, AU or EU). ROE development should take place as part of the operational planning process. 3. The establishment of an ROE Planning Cell should be considered. The Cell should be led by operational staffs and include legal advisors, policy advisers and officers with specialist expertise in land, air, maritime, outer space, and/or cyberspace operations, as appropriate. In multinational operations, early engagement with other multinational force nations is essential. 4. Responsibility for drafting ROE usually sits with current operations or plans and policy staff, but this varies among nations. The legal advisor should play a significant role in assisting with ROE development and should serve as a principal assistant to the operations staff that drafts ROE. 5. Legal advisers will ensure that ROE are consistent with the relevant law and reflect the political mandates and the national policies of nations contributing to the Force. Therefore legal advisors will need to analyse the legal basis for the mission and the legal framework that will regulate the application of force, taking into account the characterization of the conflict. This includes identifying the nature of the operation, including whether it is an armed conflict and, if so, the nature of the armed conflict (international or non-international). 6. Once ROE have been drafted and approved (see the ROE DRAFTING CHECKLIST at Annex B), they are published to the Force. ROE will normally be contained within or linked to an operational planning document or order. In addition, guidance on the use of force may also be contained or referred to in other sections of planning documents or orders. Where this occurs, particular care must be taken to ensure that different sections containing ROE guidance are harmonized. 7. Consideration should be given to creating ROE products (cards, briefs, etc.) that summarize key ROE provisions for distribution to and training of operational forces. Additionally, an ROE matrix that summarizes the ROE of each multinational partner is a useful tool (see Appendix 3 to Annex C). 8. ROE should be continually assessed by both tactical and operational level commanders so that appropriate adjustments can be made as missions develop, as the intelligence picture changes (in particular, threats to tactical level units), and, where applicable, as the enemys tactics, techniques and procedures evolve. New measures should be requested or implemented as necessary so as to ensure the ROE remain consistent with the mission, the operational situation (especially the threat), political and policy guidance, and the law. Proposing or implementing changes is achieved through
ROEREQ, ROEAUTH, and ROEIMP procedures (see Appendix 2 to Annex C). Whenever ROE are believed to be unclear, clarification should be sought from higher headquarters. 9. Scenario based ROE training will ensure that ROE are understood and applied properly by all units and members of the Force. Multinational Force commanders should meet with subordinate commanders to ensure a common understanding of ROE.
ENVIRONMENT-SPECIFIC GUIDANCE 2.1 Land Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of land operations is that they take place on sovereign territory, with or without the permission of the sovereign government. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE for land operations are: i. The legal basis for presence and activities in the sovereign territory of another nation: in particular whether the military activity has the consent of the nation(s) in which it is taking place. ii. Where the nation has given consent, whether or not the law of the nation in which the forces are present applies, in particular the extent of any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or other international arrangement. iii. c. Whether there is a legal basis to arrest or detain.
Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Protection of Freedom of Movement of Persons (Series 21) Warning Shots (Series 23) Search and Detention of Persons (Series 25) Neutrals (Series 32) Use of Force to Protect Property (Series 40) Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross Border Incursions (Series 50) Relative Positioning of Force Units (Series 53) Exercising in the Presence of a Potential Adversary (Series 54) Diversions (Series 55) Use of Obstacles and Barriers (Series 56) Zones (Series 57) Harassment (Series 61) Sensors and Illumination (Series 63) Use of Land Mines, Cluster Munitions, and Booby Traps (Series 8082) Assistance to Civil Authorities (Series 110) Crowd and Riot Control (Series 120)
Information Operations (Series 130 - 133)
Maritime Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of the maritime environment is that it includes areas subject to the territorial sovereignty of nations (national waters and national airspace) and areas not subject to the territorial sovereignty of any nation (international waters and international airspace). b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE for maritime operations are: i. The sea area where operations are to take place and the legal regime that applies, including navigation and overflight rights, the duties and rights of the coastal and flag states, and the rights and duties of neutrals or other nonparticipants. ii. The legal basis for the operation, including any specific legal authority for conducting operations in national waters or for conducting maritime interdiction operations. iii. c. The principle of sovereign immunity.
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Prevention of Interference with Ships and Aircraft (Series 22) Warning Shots (Series 23) Disabling Fire (Series 24) Search and Detention of Persons (Series 25) Neutrals (Series 32) Inspection, Seizure and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Diversions (Series 55) Zones (Series 57) Harassment (Series 61) Sensors and Illumination (Series 63) Maritime Law Enforcement (Series 90) Submarine Contacts (Series 91) Naval Mines (Series 92) Boardings (Series 93) Suppression of Piracy (Series 94)
Air Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of air operations is that they take place in both national airspace and international airspace. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE for air operations are: i. The area where operations are to take place and the legal regime that applies, including the rights of overflight. ii. The interception and use of force against civil aircraft or any other specifically protected aircraft, such as medical aircraft. c. Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: 2.4 Prevention of Interference with Ships and Aircraft (Series 22) Warning Shots (Series 23) Identification of Targets (Series 31) Neutrals (Series 32) Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Relative Positioning of Force Units (Series 53) Diversions (Series 55) Zones (Series 57) Harassment (Series 61) Shadowing, Surveillance and Marking (Series 62) Submarine Contacts (Series 91) Use of Air to Surface Munitions (Series 100) Use of Air to Sub-surface Munitions (Series 101) Air to Air Engagements (Series 102)
Outer Space Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive features of outer space are that it is beyond the sovereignty of any nation and that all nations enjoy freedom of equal access and use.
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE for space operations are: i. It is prohibited to place conventional weapons on the moon and celestial bodies and to station nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction anywhere in outer space. ii. No nation can claim jurisdiction or sovereignty over any portion of outer space. iii. The use of satellites for surveillance, communication and navigation for military purposes, over-flight by missiles, and the stationing of conventional weapons on satellites are not prohibited activities. iv. The determination of where national airspace ends and outer space begins is not yet settled. c. Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: 2.5 Interference with Satellite Communications (Series 140). Neutralization/Destruction of Satellites (Series 141).
Cyberspace Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of cyberspace is that it is a notional environment and beyond the jurisdiction of any single nation. Computer network operations (CNO) are the principle form of operations in cyberspace and are often non-kinetic, making the determination of hostile act and hostile intent difficult. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE for cyberspace operations are: i. Domestic and international civil and criminal laws and national policies vary widely on the legal aspects of CNO. Further, multilateral and bilateral communications treaties have provisions that impact the conduct of computer network operations. ii. Despite being non-kinetic, operations in cyberspace may constitute a hostile act or hostile intent. Factors in the determination of both include the severity, immediacy, directness and effects of the operation.
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Computer Network Operations (Series 131) Interference with Satellite Communications (Series 140) Neutralization/Destruction of Satellites (Series 141)
TASK-SPECIFIC PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 Peace Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive features of Peace Operations are that they involve a mixture of military forces and diplomatic and humanitarian agencies and are designed to achieve a peaceful resolution or other specific conditions. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE are: i. The legal basis for presence in the sovereign territory (including national waters and airspace) of another nation, in particular whether the military activity has the consent of the nation(s) in which it is taking place. ii. Where the legal basis for presence includes a UNSC Resolution, whether that resolution is under Chapter VI or Chapter VII. iii. Whether any Chapter VII resolution gives the authority to use all necessary means and whether the basis for the use of force is restricted to self-defence, which may include the defence of designated persons. iv. The extent of any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or other international arrangement. c. Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Protection of Freedom of Movement of Persons (Series 21) Warning Shots (Series 23) Search and Detention of Persons (Series 25) Use of Force to Protect Property (Series 40) Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Relative Positioning of Force Units (Series 53) Diversions (Series 55) Use of Obstacles and Barriers (Series 56) Sensors and Illumination (Series 63) Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, Including Law Enforcement (Series 110) Search, Detention, and Arrest of Persons (Series 111) Treatment of Detained and Arrested Persons (Series 112)
Crowd and Riot Control (Series 120) Riot Control Agents (Series 121) Riot Control Munitions/Water Cannons (Series 122)
Non-Combatant Evacuation Operations (NEO) a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEO) is that they assist other government departments in evacuating nationals and selected others from threatening circumstances in a foreign or host nation. NEOs are fundamentally defensive in nature. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE are: i. The legal basis for presence in the sovereign territory (including national waters and national airspace) of the nation from which the NEO is taking place; in particular whether the NEO is conducted with or without host nation consent and, accordingly, whether the context is permissive, uncertain, or hostile. ii. The extent of any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or other international arrangement. c. Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Protection of Freedom of Movement of Persons(Series 21) Warning Shots (Series 23) Search and Detention of Persons (Series 25) Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Relative Positioning of Force Units (Series 53) Diversions (Series 55) Use of Obstacles and Barriers (Series 56) Sensors and Illumination (Series 63) Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, Including Law Enforcement (Series 110) Crowd and Riot Control (Series 120) Riot Control Agents (Series 121) Riot Control Munitions/Water Cannons (Series 122) Electronic Warfare Measures (Series 130)
Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief (HA/DR) a. Introduction
The distinctive features of Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief (HA/DR) are that they are generally short-term programs to alleviate suffering caused by natural or man-made disasters, and they complement the efforts of local civil authorities or other agencies with the consent of the host nation. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE are: i. Whether the carriage of weapons is necessary and whether the host nation has given consent to do so. ii. The extent of any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or other international arrangement. iii. c. The operational restraints imposed by the host nation.
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: 3.4 Freedom of Movement of Persons (Series 21) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, including Law Enforcement (Series 110) Crowd and Riot Control (Series 120) Riot Control Agents (Series 121) Riot Control Munitions/Water Cannons (Series 122)
Assistance to Civil Authorities a. Introduction
The provision of assistance to civil authorities involves domestic operations in which military forces perform civilian functions normally the responsibility of other government agencies. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE are: i. Whether the carriage of personal weapons is necessary.
ii. c.
Whether a power of arrest or detention is required. Applicable ROE
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: 3.5 Use of Force to Protect Property (Series 40) Authority to Carry Weapons (Series 70) Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, including Law Enforcement (Series 110) Search, Detention, and Arrest of Persons (Series 111) Treatment of Detained and Arrested persons (Series 112) Crowd and Riot Control (Series 120) Riot Control Agents (Series 121) Riot Control Munitions/Water cannons (Series 122)
Maritime Interdiction Operations a. Introduction
The distinctive feature of maritime interdiction operations is that they involve the assertion of jurisdiction by warships (and/or military aircraft) over the vessels and/or aircraft of other states. Each participating nation will have a national position on what they are permitted to do (both as a matter of law and policy) in international waters and international airspace in respect of other nations vessels and aircraft. b. Legal Considerations
The principal legal considerations when drafting ROE are: i. The sea area where operations are to take place and the legal regime that applies, including navigation and overflight rights, the duties and rights of the coastal and flag states, and the rights and duties of neutrals or other non-participants. ii. The legal basis for the operation, including any specific legal authority for conducting operations in national waters or for conducting maritime interdiction operations. iii. The principle of sovereign immunity.
iv. Different national legal and policy positions on the right to visit on the basis of a masters consent.
In addition to the compulsory rules as set out at paragraph 3.d.i of Annex B, the following ROE should be considered: Prevention of Interference with Ships and Aircraft (Series 22) Warning Shots (Series 23) Disabling Fire (Series 24) Search and Detention of Persons (Series 25) Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property (Series 42) Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions (Series 50) Diversions (Series 55) Zones (Series 57) Harassment and Counter-Harassment (Series 61) Sensors and Illumination (Series 63) Maritime Law Enforcement (Series 90) Boardings (Series 93) Suppression of Piracy (Series 94)
GUIDANCE ON HOSTILE INTENT 4.1 Defining Hostile Intent a. Hostile intent is the threat of the imminent use of force. A determination of hostile intent is based on the existence of an identifiable threat recognizable on the basis of both of the following conditions: i.Capability. ii. Intention. b. The right to use force in self-defence arises either when forces have been attacked and/or when there is demonstrated hostile intent. Demonstrated hostile intent exists when there is a reasonable belief that an attack or use of force is imminent, based on an assessment of all the facts and circumstances known at the time. Some nations permit the right of individual self-defence and unit self-defence to be limited by a force commander (see Series 10 and 11 in Annex B). 4.2 Ascertaining Hostile Intent. In determining whether an entity is demonstrating hostile intent, forces will use their best judgment and consider available intelligence, political and military factors, indications and warnings, and all other relevant information concerning the capabilities of possible threats in the area of operations. 4.3 Indicators of Hostile Intent. There is no checklist of indicators that will conclusively determine hostile intent. The following are examples of actions that may, depending on the circumstances, demonstrate hostile intent: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Aiming or directing weapons. Adopting an attack profile. Closing within weapon release range. Illuminating with radar or laser designators. Passing targeting information. Laying or preparing to lay naval mines. Failing to respond to the proactive measures listed below in 4.4.
4.4 Proactive Measures that may Assist in Ascertaining Hostile Intent. In addition to the above indicators of hostile intent, time and circumstances permitting, forces should take proactive measures to assist in determining the intent of an opposing entity or force, including, but not limited to: a. Verbal query (see Appendix 7 to Annex C).
b. c. d. e.
Verbal warning (see Appendix 7 to Annex C). Visual signals. Noise signals. Physical barriers.
f. Changing course and speed to determine if continuing to maintain an attack profile. g. h. Illuminating with fire control radar. Firing warning shots.
ESCALATION OF FORCE IN SELF-DEFENCE 5.1 Introduction. In all self-defence situations, when confronted with circumstances in which the use of force may become necessary, it is appropriate to exercise control over the application of force so as to ensure that the use of force is justifiable. Consequently, when time and circumstances permit, use of force must always be graduated (also referred to as escalation). Escalation of force (EOF) may involve sequential actions that begin with nondeadly force measures and may graduate to deadly force measures. EOF procedures are designed to avoid unjustifiable use of force. EOF procedures also may assist in the determination of hostile intent (see Appendix 4 to Annex A). 5.2 Graduated use of force. Graduated use of force requires that individuals confronted with a need to use force should always aim to use the least harmful option available in those circumstances. Indeed, one principal purpose of graduated use of force is to create operational time and space in the hope that there will be no need to escalate to use of deadly force in self-defence. 5.3 Use of force options. A variety of options for use of force may be available in any given situation. The options available will often include: a. b. c. d. e. f. Presence. Verbal and visual warnings, including display of weapons. Soft physical pressure. Hard physical pressure. Non-lethal weapons (such as batons). Lethal weapons (such as firearms).
5.4 General Considerations. There are a number of general considerations that should be taken into account in relation to EOF policy, options, and training: a. EOF is concerned with employing the necessary option. Use of force options must be read within their context on every occasion that is, the assessment as to what the minimum first response shall be should be made on a case-by-case basis. Use of an excessive option, where a less harmful option could reasonably have achieved the aim of neutralizing or removing the threat in the circumstances encountered, may have legal consequences for individual users of force. b. Where time and circumstances permit it is expected that less harmful options (for example, warnings or warning shots) will be exercised before more harmful options are used. c. On some occasions, for operational reasons, ROE may limit access to certain less harmful EOF options. For example, ROE may prohibit use of warning shots. However, it must be remembered on all occasions that ROE and EOF procedures do
not limit the right of self-defence. Subject to any limitations promulgated in ROE (either series 10 or 11), all necessary and proportional means and actions may be used in self-defence. d. Force preparation should include scenario-based training in EOF situations that members of the Force are likely to encounter during the operation, such as checkpoint or access control operations. e. Use of proactive measures to determine hostile intent (see paragraph 4.4 of Appendix 4 to Annex A) and EOF measures are similar and may serve the same purpose.
TARGETING AND ROE 6.1 Targeting is the process of selecting and prioritizing targets and matching the appropriate response to them, taking account of operational requirements and capabilities, applicable ROE, and LOAC. 6.2 The relationship between ROE and targeting is summarized as follows: a. Forces may target only those military objectives permitted to be targeted in the relevant ROE. b. ROE may impose policy restrictions on targeting that go beyond the requirements of the LOAC. c. ROE must never permit targeting that is not consistent with LOAC.
6.3 Targeting Directives for a mission may set out limitations such as restricted target lists and no-strike lists. Additionally, commanders may be restricted from taking certain actions by their ROE. 6.4 In order to conduct targeting for any mission, planners, often referred to as a targeting cell, must have ROE for mission accomplishment (Series 20) that permit the use of force, up to and including deadly force. These ROE measures will reflect the effects that the commander intends to achieve. If there are no permissions under Series 20, then attacks cannot be conducted. 6.5 ROE will reflect the LOAC requirement that under no condition will an attack be permitted where the expected incidental injury or death of civilians and collateral damage to civilian objects is excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated to be gained by the attack. In exceptional cases, higher authority or a commander (through an operation order or statement of commanders intent) may direct that more restrictive standards be applied. For example, a commander may: a. prohibit attacks in which any collateral damage is a foreseeable consequence; b. prohibit attacks where incidental injury or death of specified classes of persons (such as children) or a specified number of persons is expected; c. prohibit attacks where otherwise permissible collateral damage to specified civilian objects is expected; or d. direct that selected military objectives be disabled rather than destroyed.
The above restrictive standards, as a general rule, would be applicable to mission accomplishment situations and not to use of force in self-defence situations.
MODEL TARGETING CHECK-LIST Target Description: Grid Ref: 1 Do you have authority under ROE / Orders to conduct attack? If yes proceed to 2. If no DO NOT ATTACK Is the objective on a No Strike / Restricted Target List? If no proceed to 3. If yes DO NOT ATTACK Does the target make an effective contribution to enemy military action? If yes proceed to 4. If no DO NOT ATTACK Will its destruction or neutralization, in current circumstances, offer a definite military advantage? If yes proceed to 5. If no DO NOT ATTACK Is the attack expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof (i.e. collateral damage)? If yes proceed to 6. If no proceed to 11. Do your targeting directive and ROE permit collateral damage? If yes proceed to 7. If no DO NOT ATTACK Is there an alternative military target available with the same military advantage, with less risk of collateral damage? If no proceed to 8. If yes return to 1 for new target Have all feasible precautions in the choice of means and methods of attack with a view to avoiding, and in any event to minimizing, incidental loss or civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects been taken? If yes proceed to 9. If no, do so, and then reassess 8. Where circumstances permit, has an effective advance warning been given of attacks that may affect the civilian population? If yes proceed to 10. If no, issue warning before proceeding to 10. Is the attack expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated? If yes DO NOT ATTACK. If no proceed to step 11. ATTACK PERMITTED - BUT CONTINUE TO MONITOR. CHANGE - DUTY TO REASSESS ATTACK.
IF CIRCUMSTANCES
Annex B
COMPENDIUM OF ROE 1. This Compendium provides rules for the drafting of ROE. The rules are divided into groups that deal with different areas of military activity. Within these groups there are a number of series of rules, each of which regulates a distinct activity. Individual rules are selected from the series as required. Spare numbers are provided for the drafting of rules not included in the Compendium. Some of the rules include the term (SPECIFY). This means that detail must be inserted to clarify the meaning of the rule. 2. The Handbook is constructed on the basis that the right to use force in individual self-defence or unit self-defence is not limited unless a rule in Groups 10-19 specifically does so. 3. The process for drafting ROE from this Compendium is set out below and summarized in the ROE Drafting Check List. a. Analyse the mission. Pay particular attention to the policy, operational and legal considerations that may affect ROE, including higher authority intent or guidance. Determine the character of the operation as involving armed conflict (international or non-international) or as falling outside armed conflict in order to determine the applicable rules. b. Identify tasks from Mission Statement in OPORD. The OPORD will contain the mission statement and military tasks that are to be completed to accomplish the mission. These tasks need to be identified before any consideration can be given to drafting ROE. c. Identify any current ROE. This is necessary to determine if changes will be required. d. Prepare the ROE. . i. Identify Compulsory Rules. The first ROE to be considered are the compulsory rules. The compulsory rules deal with matters that are fundamental to any mission and must be present in every ROE, even if the rule selected is one that prohibits the military activity. Every ROE is to include a rule from each of series 10, 11, 12, 60 & 70. For any mission beyond self-defence, a rule from series 20 is required. In situations involving armed conflict, measures from series 30 and 32 are required. ii. Identify Environment-Specific Rules. Appendix 2 to Annex A provides guidance for drafting ROE for environments including land, maritime, air, outer space, and cyberspace operations. The rules that are most likely to be required are set out for each environment but are not compulsory. iii. Identify Task Specific Rules. Appendix 3 to Annex A provides guidance for drafting ROE for specific tasks including peace operations, noncombatant evacuation operations, humanitarian assistance/disaster relief,
and assistance to civil authorities. The rules that are most likely to be required are set out for each environment but are not compulsory. iv. Review remaining rules in Compendium. Each mission is unique so the environment and task specific guidance will not always be sufficient. ROE drafters should check all the series in the Compendium to see if any other rules are required to accomplish the mission. v. Draft rules. The ROE message should be drafted with ROE listed in numerical order. It is possible, and sometimes necessary, to have two rules chosen from the same series. vi. Draft spare rules, if required. The Compendium cannot anticipate every possible mission and rule that may be required. Where a rule is not provided, it can be drafted under a spare number using the same format as other rules in that series or as part of a new group or series. vii. Determine Retained Rules. Decide which rules, if any, are to be retained at a higher level. These rules will remain dormant until a ROEIMP message is issued. e. Validate ROE by comparing to tasks. The ROE must be checked against the mission and task to ensure that it supports mission accomplishment within the limitations set out by higher authority. Rectify shortfalls, if any. f. Obtain approval. Seek approval from the appropriate level of authority.
ROE DRAFTING CHECKLIST
Analyse the Mission
Identify tasks from Mission Statement in OPORD Identify any current ROE
Identify compulsory rules
Identify environment specific rules
Identify task specific rules
Review remaining rules in compendium Draft rules, including spare rules if required Determine retained rules
Validate ROE by comparing to tasks
ROE do not support tasks
ROE support tasks
Identify shortfalls and rectify
Obtain approval
GROUP 10-19: USE OF FORCE IN THE DEFENCE OF SELF AND OTHERS Note: For purposes of self-defence, Force includes persons accompanying the Force, Prisoners of War, internees and detainees under the control of the Force. Series 10 Purpose: Use of Force in Individual Self-Defence To regulate the right to use force in individual self-defence. Rule 10 A 10 B 10 C 10 D Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in individual selfdefence is permitted, except as follows: (SPECIFY). Use of non-deadly force in individual self-defence is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in individual selfdefence is permitted. Use of non-deadly force in defence of property where there is likelihood that destruction of, or damage to, that property will lead to the injury of (SPECIFY persons) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in defence of property where there is a likelihood that destruction of, or damage to, that property will lead to an imminent threat to life of (SPECIFY persons) is permitted. Note: Defence of property in such situations is an exercise of the right of individual self-defence, unit self-defence, or the right to protect the specified persons. Specified persons might include members of the Force, own state nationals, all civilians, etc. See Series 40 for measures regarding the use of force to protect property where no imminent threat to life exists. 10 F-Z Series 11 Purpose: Spare.
Use of Force in Unit Self-Defence To regulate the right to use force in unit self-defence. Rule 11 A Use of force, up to and including deadly force, is permitted in unit self-defence, except as follows: (SPECIFY). Use of non-deadly force in unit self-defence is permitted.
11 C 11 D 11 E
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in unit self-defence of (SPECIFY groups or units, e.g. the Force, civilians) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force in unit self-defence of (SPECIFY groups or units) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force where there is likelihood of damage to property that will lead to injury of persons in own unit or other units of own nation is permitted. Use of non-deadly force where there is likelihood of damage to property that will lead to injury of persons in (SPECIFY groups or units, e.g. the Force, civilians) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, where there is a likelihood of damage to property that will lead to an imminent threat to life in own unit or other units of own nation is permitted. Note: Defence of property in such situations is an exercise of the right of unit self-defence in situations where the unit or persons in the unit are in peril. See Series 40 for measures regarding the use of force to protect property. Spare.
11 H-Z Series 12 Purpose:
Use of Force for the Protection of Others To regulate the use of force for protection of persons who are not members of the Force. Rule 12 A 12 B 12 C 12 D Use of force for the protection of others is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force for the protection of others in (SPECIFY group) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, for the protection of others of (SPECIFY group) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent the commission of a serious crime against (SPECIFY) persons is permitted. Spare.
12 E-Z Series 13
Use of Force in National Self-Defence
To regulate the use of force in national self-defence. Rule 13 A 13 B Use of force in national self-defence is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force in national self-defence of (SPECIFY nation) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force in national self-defence of (SPECIFY nation) when authorised by (SPECIFY authority) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in national selfdefence of (SPECIFY nation) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in national selfdefence of (SPECIFY nation) when authorised by (SPECIFY authority) is permitted. Spare.
13 F-Z Series 14-19 SPARE
GROUP 20-29: MISSION ACCOMPLISHMENT Series 20 Purpose: Use of Force for Mission Accomplishment To regulate the use of force for the purposes of mission accomplishment. Note: Where there is no armed conflict, some nations will only deadly force only in self-defence. Rule 20 A 20 B Use of non-deadly force to accomplish the mission is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to counter force used to interfere with the mission is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to accomplish the mission is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to counter force used to interfere with the mission is permitted. Spare.
20 E-Z
Series 21 Purpose:
Protection of Freedom of Movement of Persons To regulate the use of force in providing freedom of movement of personnel. Rule 21 A 21 B Use of force to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of persons belonging to the Force is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force, to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of persons belonging to the Force, is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of persons belonging to the Force, is permitted. Use of force to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of (SPECIFY persons) is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force, to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of (SPECIFY persons), is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent interference with the freedom of movement of (SPECIFY persons), is permitted. Spare.
21 G-Z Series 22 Purpose:
Prevention of Interference with Ships and Aircraft To regulate the circumstances in which force may be used to prevent unauthorised boarding or seizure of ships or aircraft. Rule 22 A 22 B Use of force to prevent unauthorised boarding of ships/aircraft is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to prevent unauthorised boarding of (SPECIFY ships/aircraft) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force to prevent unauthorised boarding of (SPECIFY ships/aircraft), is permitted. Spare.
22 D-Z Series 23
To regulate the use of warning shots other than in self-defence. Note: For use of warnings other than warning shots see Series 60. Rule 23 A 23 B Firing of warning shots is prohibited. Firing of warning shots in the vicinity of (SPECIFY elements) is permitted. Firing of warning shots to compel compliance with (SPECIFY instructions) is permitted. Firing of warning shots is permitted. Spare.
23 D 23 E-Z Series 24 Purpose:
Disabling Fire To regulate the use of disabling fire. Rule 24 A 24 B Use of disabling fire is prohibited. Use of disabling fire to compel compliance with (SPECIFY instructions) is permitted. Use of disabling fire is permitted. Spare.
24 C 24 D-Z Series 25 Purpose:
Search and Detention of Persons To regulate the circumstances in which persons may be searched and detained, other than in Assistance to Civilian and Law Enforcement Authorities (see Series 111). Rule 25 A 25 B Search of (SPECIFY persons) is prohibited. Search of (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to search (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted.
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to search (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to disarm (SPECIFY persons) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly-force to disarm (SPECIFY persons), is permitted. Detention of (SPECIFY persons) is prohibited. Detention of (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to detain (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to detain (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances), is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to prevent the escape of (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent the escape of (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances), is permitted. Spare.
25 E 25 F
25 G 25 H
25 M-Z Series 26 Purpose:
Use of Force to Secure the Release of Persons To regulate the use of force in securing the release of persons. Rule 26 A 26 B Use of force to secure the release from custody of persons belonging to the Force is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to secure the release from custody of persons belonging to the Force is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to secure the release from custody of persons belonging to the Force, is permitted. Use of force to secure the release from custody of (SPECIFY persons) is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to secure the release from custody of (SPECIFY persons) is permitted.
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to secure the release from custody of (SPECIFY persons), is permitted. Spare.
Indirect Fire (Unobserved Indirect Fire and Observed Indirect Fire) To regulate the use of indirect fire Notes: 1. Definitions of the terms direct fire, observed indirect fire, and unobserved indirect fire vary among nations. Annex D provides generally accepted definitions. If national policy dictates a different definition, that definition should be published with the ROE. 2. For the purposes of this Handbook, direct fire and observed indirect fire are permitted unless restricted by a rule. Unobserved indirect fire is not permitted unless authorised by a rule.
Rule 27 A Use of (SPECIFY unobserved fire, observed indirect fire, or all indirect fire) is prohibited (in the following situations: SPECIFY situations, e.g. populated areas). . Use of unobserved indirect fire is permitted (in the following situations: SPECIFY situations). Spare.
27 C-Z Series 28 29 Spare
GROUP 30-39: TARGETING IN ARMED CONFLICT Series 30 Purpose: ENGAGEMENT OF MILITARY OBJECTIVES INCLUDING HOSTILE FORCES To regulate the engagement of military objectives including hostile forces. Rule 30 A Attack on declared hostile forces and other military objectives within (SPECIFY area) is permitted. AMPN: Declared hostile forces are: a. Combatants of the armed forces of (SPECIFY nation), b. Civilians taking a direct part in hostilities, and/or
c. (SPECIFY others e.g. group/vessel.) 30 B 30 C 30 D-Z Non-destructive attack on (SPECIFY property) is permitted. Attack on (SPECIFY property) is prohibited. Spare. Note: All actions under this series are to be conducted in accordance with the LOAC. For example, medical personnel, chaplains of the armed forces and those who are hors de combat may not be attacked. Series 30 should be considered in conjunction with Series 31 - Identification of Targets. Series 31 Purpose: Identification of Targets To regulate the means of identification required in using force against a target. Rule 31 A Identification of a target must be by visual means. Note: For the purpose of this rule, visual includes the use of image magnifiers such as binoculars, telescopes and periscopes. 31 B Identification of a target must be by visual means and (SPECIFY number and/or combination of the following means): a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. 31 C Identification friend or foe (IFF) Other means requiring a response Thermal imaging Electro-optical Electronic intercept intelligence Data link information Passive acoustic analysis Track origin and behaviour Flight path correlation Magnetic signature EW support measures Other identification means not requiring a response
Identification of a target must be by (SPECIFY number and/or combination of the following means): a. Visual b. Identification friend or foe (IFF) c. Other means requiring a response
d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. 31 D
Thermal imaging Electro-optical Electronic intercept intelligence Data link information Passive acoustic analysis Track origin and behaviour Flight path correlation Magnetic signature EW support measures Other identification means not requiring a response
Use of information from (SPECIFY force/sources) for target identification is prohibited. Use of (SPECIFY means) information from (SPECIFY force/sources) for target identification is permitted. Use of information from (SPECIFY force/sources) for target identification is permitted. Spare.
31 G-Z Series 32 Purpose: Neutrals
To regulate the interaction of own force with neutrals. Rule 32 A 32 B Interference with the activities of neutrals is prohibited. Interference with the activities of neutrals in accordance with the law of armed conflict for the purposes of (SPECIFY actions, e.g. to conduct visit and search, instructing the vessel/aircraft to depart from the immediate area of operations, etc) is permitted. Conduct of (SPECIFY operation) in (SPECIFY neutral states) territorial sea, archipelagic waters or airspace is permitted. Spare.
32 D-Z Series 33 39 Spare
GROUP 40-49: OPERATIONS RELATED TO PROPERTY Series 40 Purpose: Use of Force to Protect Property To regulate the use of force to protect property.
Rule 40 A 40 B Use of force to protect property belonging to the Force is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to protect property belonging to the Force is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to protect property belonging to the Force is permitted. Use of force to protect property is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to protect property is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force to protect property is permitted. Spare.
40 D 40 E 40 F
Protection of Vital/Mission Essential/Specified Property To regulate the use of force in the protection of vital property, mission essential property, and other specified property. Rule 41 A 41 B Use of non-deadly force to protect (SPECIFY) property is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to protect (SPECIFY property) is permitted. Spare.
41 C-Z Series 42 Purpose:
Inspection, Seizure, and Destruction of Property To regulate the circumstances in which property may be inspected, seized, and destroyed. Rule 42 A 42 B 42 C Inspection of (SPECIFY property) is prohibited. Inspection of (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to inspect (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted.
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to inspect (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances), is permitted. Seizure of (SPECIFY property) is prohibited. Seizure of (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to seize (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to seize (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of force to secure the release of property following its seizure is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to secure the release of property belonging to the Force following the seizure of such property is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to secure the release of (SPECIFY) property belonging to the Force following its seizure, is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to secure the release of (SPECIFY property) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to secure the release of (SPECIFY property), is permitted. Destruction of (SPECIFY property) is prohibited. Destruction of (SPECIFY property) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Spare.
42 L 42 M
42 N 42 O
42 P-Z Series 43 49 Spare
GROUP 50-59: GEOGRAPHIC POSITIONING Series 50 Purpose: Geographic Positioning of Force Units and Cross-Border Incursions To regulate the position of Force units in relation to the territory, maritime zones or airspace of others. Note: Except to the extent excluded, restricted, modified, or amplified by a measure in Series 58, Force units may exercise freedoms of navigation and over-flight in accordance with international law (see Part V, paragraph 19).
Rule 50 A 50 B Entry into (SPECIFY area) of (SPECIFY nation or area) is prohibited. Approach closer than (SPECIFY distance / range) to (SPECIFY area) is prohibited. Entry into (SPECIFY area) except for the following circumstances (SPECIFY e.g. for transit passage, when rendered necessary by force majeure or distress, in assistance entry, in self-defence, etc.) is prohibited. Entry into (SPECIFY area) for (SPECIFY purpose or task, e.g. innocent passage, transit passage, archipelagic sea lanes passage, and assistance entry, SAR, NEO) is permitted.
50 E 50 F-Z Series 51 Purpose:
Entry into (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Spare.
Ground Reconnaissance To regulate the conduct of ground reconnaissance. Rule 51 A 51 B 51 C-Z Conduct of ground reconnaissance in (SPECIFY area) is prohibited. Conduct of ground reconnaissance in (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Spare.
Aerial Reconnaissance To regulate the use of aerial reconnaissance Rule 52 A 52 B 52 C Aerial reconnaissance over (SPECIFY area) is prohibited. Aerial reconnaissance against (SPECIFY force) is prohibited. Aerial reconnaissance at altitudes of less than (SPECIFY altitude above ground level) over (SPECIFY force/area) is prohibited.
52 D 52 E 52 F 52 G-Z Series 53 Purpose:
Aerial reconnaissance against (SPECIFY force) is permitted. Aerial reconnaissance over (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Aerial reconnaissance is permitted. Spare.
Relative Positioning of Force Units To regulate the position of Force units in relation to other forces or assets. Rule 53 A 53 B Approaching closer than (SPECIFY distance / range) to (SPECIFY forces / contacts of interest) is prohibited. Approaching (SPECIFY forces /contacts of interest) within (SPECIFY distance) for (SPECIFY purposee.g. to establish identity) is permitted. Approaching (SPECIFY forces / contacts of interest) within (SPECIFY distance) is permitted. Unrestricted approach of (SPECIFY forces / contacts of interest) is permitted. Spare.
53 E-Z Series 54 Purpose:
Exercising in the Presence of a Potential Adversary To regulate the conduct of exercises in the presence of a potential enemy. Note: While the conduct of an exercise is a lawful activity, such activity in the presence of a potential enemy, could be viewed as provocative. Rule 54 A 54 B Conduct of exercises in the presence of (SPECIFY) units is prohibited. Conduct of (SPECIFY) exercises in the presence of (SPECIFY) units is permitted. Aiming of weapons in the direction of (SPECIFY) is prohibited. Aiming of weapons in the direction of (SPECIFY) is permitted.
54 C 54 D
Spare.
Diversions To regulate the use and enforcement of diversions. Rule 55 A 55 B Ordering of diversions is prohibited. Advising (SPECIFY persons/objects) on land to avoid (SPECIFY) areas is permitted. Advising (SPECIFY) aircraft to avoid (SPECIFY) areas is permitted. Advising (SPECIFY) ships to avoid (SPECIFY) areas is permitted. Ordering of diversions to (SPECIFY person/objects) on land for (SPECIFY) purpose is permitted. Ordering of diversions to (SPECIFY) aircraft for (SPECIFY) purpose is permitted. Ordering of diversions to (SPECIFY) ships for (SPECIFY) purpose is permitted. Ordering of diversions and other instructions to ships suspected of operating in breach of UNSCR (SPECIFY) is permitted. Use of (SPECIFY actions) to compel compliance with (SPECIFY diversion instructions) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to compel compliance with (SPECIFY diversion instructions) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to compel compliance with (SPECIFY diversion instructions), is permitted. Spare.
55 L-Z Series 56 Purpose:
Use of Obstacles and Barriers To regulate the use of obstacles and barriers. Rule 56 A Use of obstacles and barriers is prohibited.
Use of non-explosive obstacles and barriers in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of a counter-terrorist warning boom is prohibited. Use of a counter-terrorist warning circumstances/location) is permitted. Spare. boom in (SPECIFY
56 E-Z Series 57 Purpose: Zones
To regulate enforcement mechanisms for declared zones in land, maritime, and air environments. Rule 57 A Use of non-deadly force against (SPECIFY units) entering (SPECIFY area) without permission for (SPECIFY purpose e.g. reconnaissance) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force within (SPECIFY area) to disarm (SPECIFY groups or individuals) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, within (SPECIFY area) to disarm (SPECIFY groups or individuals) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force on (SPECIFY units) entering (SPECIFY area) without permission is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force on (SPECIFY units) who have entered (SPECIFY area) and failed to depart when warned is permitted. Spare.
57 F-Z Series 58 Purpose:
Freedom of Navigation To regulate the exercise of freedom of navigation. Note: These rights are to be exercised with due regard for the legitimate rights of the Coastal State in the relevant zone. Unless otherwise directed, this Rule permits exercise of applicable rights in international waters that are subject to excessive maritime claims both geographical (such as excessive straight baselines) and jurisdictional (such as over security in the CZ or EEZ). Rule
Exercise of freedom of navigation in the (SPECIFY claimed security zone or other excessive maritime claim) of (SPECIFY nation / nations) is prohibited. Exercise of freedom of navigation in the (SPECIFY claimed security zone or other excessive maritime claim) of (SPECIFY nation / nations) is permitted. Exercise of freedom of navigation in the Contiguous Zone (CZ) and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of (SPECIFY nation / nations) is permitted. Spare.
58 D-Z Series 59 Spare
GROUP 60-69: WARNINGS, HARASSMENT, SHADOWING, ILLUMINATION Series 60 Purpose: Warnings To regulate the use of warnings. Note: For use of warning shots refer to Series 23 Warning Shots. Nothing in this Series prohibits an individual/vehicle/vessel or aircraft from communicating or displaying a warning signal. Rule 60 A 60 B 60 C Use of warnings is prohibited. Use of warnings is permitted. Use of (SPECIFY warnings) directed towards (SPECIFY elements) is permitted. Energizing fire control radar as a means of warning is permitted. Spare.
Harassment To regulate harassment. Note: A specific definitions of harassment should be included if there is doubt as to the definition of the term. Rule 61 A Harassment is prohibited.
61 B 61 C 61 D 61 E
Harassment that will not result in physical damage is permitted. Harassment that may result in physical damage is prohibited. Harassment that may result in physical damage is permitted. Harassment to a similar extent and, in a similar fashion, to harassment received by any element or unit of the Force is permitted. Spare.
Shadowing, Surveillance, and Marking To regulate or restrict the conduct of shadowing, surveillance, or marking. Rule 62 A 62 B 62 C 62 D 62 E 62 F-Z Shadowing is prohibited. Shadowing of (SPECIFY) forces is permitted. Marking is prohibited. Marking of (SPECIFY) forces is permitted. Conduct of surveillance is permitted. Spare.
Sensors and Illumination To regulate the use of sensors and means of illumination. Note: Care shall be taken not to illuminate the bridge, cab, or cockpit in such a way as to blind persons in control of ships, vehicles, or aircraft being illuminated. Rule 63 A 63 B 63 C 63 D Illumination is prohibited. Illumination of (SPECIFY) by (SPECIFY equipment) is permitted. Use of laser designators in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of laser range finders in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted.
Note: It is unlawful to use laser targeting systems to deliberately cause blindness. 63 E Energizing fire-control radars in the direction of (SPECIFY) permitted. Use of all illuminants and illumination systems is permitted. Use of active sensors is prohibited. Use of active sensors is permitted. Unrestricted use of sensors is permitted. Spare.
63 F 63 G 63 H 63 I 63 J-Z Series 64-69 Spare
GROUP 70-79: CARRYING OF WEAPONS Series 70 Purpose: Authority to Carry Weapons To regulate carrying of weapons. Rule 70 A 70 B Carrying of weapons by members of the Force is prohibited. Carrying of weapons by members of the Force in (SPECIFY location) is prohibited. Carrying of weapons by members of the Force in (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Carrying of (SPECIFY type of weapons, e.g. crew served weapons) by members of the Force in (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Carrying of weapons except in (SPECIFY location) is permitted. Note: Measure 70E is to be used when Force members are permitted to carry weapons in the area of operations, but are restricted from carrying weapons in places such as in the vicinity of cities, in host nation government buildings, etc. 70 F 70 G-Z Carrying of weapons by members of the Force is permitted. Spare.
Series 71 79
GROUP 80-89: LAND MINES, CLUSTER MUNITIONS AND BOOBY TRAPS Note: Treaty law and national policies, which go beyond the requirements of customary international law, have placed limitations on the use of these weapon systems by some nations. Series 80 Purpose: Use of Land Mines To regulate the use of land mines (including anti-personnel mines). Rule 80 A 80 B 80 C Use of land mines (including anti-personnel mines) is prohibited. Use of anti-personnel mines is prohibited. Use of surface laid anti-vehicle mines in (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Use of concealed anti-vehicle mines in (SPECIFY area) is permitted. Use of land mines (including anti-personnel mines) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of command-detonated mines is permitted. Use of land mines (except anti-personnel mines) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of land mines (except anti-personnel mines) is permitted. Use of land mines (including anti-personnel mines) is permitted. Spare.
80 D 80 E
80 F 80 G
80 H 80 I 80 J-Z Series 81 Purpose:
Use of Cluster Munitions To regulate the use of cluster munitions. Rule 81 A 81 B 81 C Use of cluster munitions is prohibited. Use of cluster munitions against (SPECIFY objectives) is permitted. Use of cluster munitions in (SPECIFY area) is permitted.
81 D-Z Series 82 Purpose:
Use of Booby Traps To regulate the use of booby traps. Rule 82 A 82 B 82 C Use of booby traps is prohibited. Use of explosive booby traps is prohibited. Use of explosive booby traps in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of booby traps against (SPECIFY objectives) is permitted. Spare.
82 D 82 E-Z Series 83-89 Spare
GROUP 90-99: MARITIME OPERATIONS Series 90 Purpose: Maritime Law Enforcement To regulate the use of force in the conduct of maritime law enforcement operations in own maritime zones, or in the maritime zones of other states where appropriately authorised. Rule 90 A Use of non-deadly force to enforce resource-related legal regimes and relevant domestic law in the exclusive economic zone and on the outer continental shelf is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to enforce resourcerelated legal regimes and relevant criminal law in the exclusive economic zone and outer continental shelf is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to enforce fiscal, immigration, sanitary, and customs legal regimes and relevant domestic law in the contiguous zone is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force to enforce fiscal, immigration, sanitary, and customs legal regimes and relevant domestic law in the contiguous zone is permitted.
Use of non-deadly force to effect hot pursuit is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force to effect hot pursuit is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to halt non-innocent passage in the territorial sea is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to halt non-innocent passage in the territorial sea is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to conduct law enforcement in national waters is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to conduct law enforcement in national waters is permitted. Spare.
90 K-Z Series 91 Purpose:
Submarine Contacts To regulate the interaction of Force units with submarine contacts. Note: The use of deadly force against a submarine contact would be authorised under Group 10-19 (SelfdDefence) or Rule 30A (Armed Conflict). Rule 91 A 91 B (SPECIFY action) against (SPECIFY) submarine contacts in (SPECIFY area or circumstances) is prohibited. Continued tracking of (SPECIFY) submarine contacts by (SPECIFY means e.g. passive/active sonar, magnetic anomaly detection, sonobuoy) is permitted. Use of warnings to induce (SPECIFY) submarine contacts to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) in (SPECIFY circumstances e.g. when located within xxx range of own forces) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to induce (SPECIFY) submarine contacts to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) in (SPECIFY circumstances e.g. when located within (SPECIFY range) of own forces) is permitted. Use of use of force, up to and including deadly force to induce (SPECIFY) submarine contacts to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) in (SPECIFY circumstances e.g. when located within xxx range of own forces) is permitted.
Use of warnings to induce (SPECIFY submarine contacts) to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to induce (SPECIFY submarine contacts) to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force to induce (SPECIFY submarine contacts) to (SPECIFY result e.g. surface, leave the area) is permitted. Spare.
91 I-Z Series 92 Purpose:
Naval Mines To regulate the use of, and response to, naval mines. Rule 92 A 92 B Use of naval mines is prohibited. Use of armed naval mines in (SPECIFY areas) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of controlled naval mines in (SPECIFY areas) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Stopping, boarding and searching of (SPECIFY vessels) in (SPECIFY areas) when there are reasonable grounds to suspect they are carrying or laying naval mines is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force against (SPECIFY vessels) engaged in (SPECIFY activity) in (SPECIFY areas) is permitted. The removal, sweeping or neutralization of naval mines in (SPECIFY areas) is permitted. Spare.
Boardings To regulate the boarding of ships. Notes: 1. See also Series 23 Warning Shots and Series 24 Disabling Fire. 2. International law recognises a number of legal bases for boarding of ships by warships. The issue of whether the boarding is compliant, non-compliant or opposed is a separate issue. For example, a lawful boarding may nevertheless
be opposed when a master seeks to prevent the boarding despite the legal right of the warship to conduct it. 3. Compliant boardings, non-compliant boardings, and opposed boardings must each be authorised by separate measures. Rule 93 A 93 B 93 C Boarding of ships is prohibited. Compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) is permitted. Compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the ship is (SPECIFY e.g. engaged in piracy, slave trading, ship without nationality, or ship of the same nationality as the warship refusing to show flag, or ship engaged in unauthorised broadcasting) is permitted. Compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) in accordance with UNSCR (SPECIFY) is permitted. Non-compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) is permitted. Non-compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the ship is (SPECIFY e.g. engaged in piracy, slave trading, ship without nationality, or ship of the same nationality as the warship refusing to show flag, or ship engaged in unauthorised broadcasting) is permitted. Non-compliant boarding of (SPECIFY ships) in accordance with UNSCR (SPECIFY) is permitted. Opposed boarding of (SPECIFY ships) is permitted. Opposed boarding of (SPECIFY ships) where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the ship is (SPECIFY e.g. engaged in piracy, slave trading, ship without nationality, or ship of the same nationality as the warship refusing to show flag, or ship engaged in unauthorised broadcasting) is permitted. Spare.
93 H 93 I
93 J-Z Series 94 Purpose:
Suppression of Piracy To regulate the use of force to suppress piracy. Notes: 1. See paragraph 2.2 in Appendix 2 to Annex A for guidance on drafting rules of engagement for maritime operations.
2. For protecting individuals from piratical attacks, refer to Series 12 Use of Force for the Protection of Others. 3. For rules for accomplishing the piracy mission, refer to Group 20-29: Mission Accomplishment. Rule 94 A Use of non-deadly force is permitted in suppression of piracy in the following situations: (SPECIFY situations) Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in suppression of piracy is permitted in the following situations: (SPECIFY situations). Continued pursuit of a fleeing pirate ship or pirate aircraft that proceeds into the territorial sea, archipelagic waters or airspace of a coastal state is permitted. Note: Every effort should be made to obtain the consent of the coastal state prior to continuation of the pursuit. 94 D Continued pursuit of a fleeing pirate ship or pirate aircraft that proceeds into the territorial sea, archipelagic waters or airspace of (SPECIFY) is permitted. Note: Every effort should be made to obtain the consent of the coastal state prior to continuation of the pursuit. 94 E Continued pursuit of a fleeing pirate ship or pirate aircraft that proceeds into the territorial sea, archipelagic waters or airspace of a coastal state is prohibited. Destruction of pirate equipment, including (SPECIFY equipment), is permitted. Spare.
94F 94 G-Z
GROUP 100-109: AIR OPERATIONS Series 100 Purpose: Use of Air to Surface Munitions To regulate the use of air to surface munitions. Rule
100 A 100 B 100 C
Use of air to surface munitions is prohibited. Use of non-precision air to surface munitions is prohibited. Use of non-precision air to surface munitions in (SPECIFY areas) is prohibited. Use of precision-guided air to surface munitions in (SPECFY areas) is permitted. Use of air to surface munitions against (SPECIFY objectives) is permitted. Spare.
100 F-Z Series 101 Purpose:
Use of Air to Sub-surface Munitions To regulate the use of air to sub-surface munitions Rule 101 A 101 B Use of air to sub-surface munitions is prohibited. Use of air to sub-surface munitions against targets belonging to (SPECIFY force) is permitted. Use of air to sub-surface munitions in (SPECIFY areas) is permitted. Spare.
101 C 101 D-Z Series 102 Purpose:
Air to Air Engagements To regulate air to air engagements Rule 102 A 102 B Beyond visual range air-to-air engagement is prohibited. Beyond visual range air-to-air engagement of hostile aircraft is permitted. Spare.
102 C-Z Series 103 109 Spare
GROUP 110-119: ASSISTANCE TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES
Series 110 Purpose:
Use of Force in Assistance to Civil Authorities, Including Law Enforcement To regulate the use of force in support of civilian authorities. Rule 110 A 110 B Law enforcement assistance to (SPECIFY civilian authorities) is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force to prevent the commission of a crime against (SPECIFY person and/or property) in the absence of civilian law enforcement officials is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to prevent the commission of a crime against (SPECIFY person and/or property) is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent the commission of a serious crime in the absence of civilian law enforcement officials is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent the commission of a serious crime is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent the commission of a crime against (SPECIFY) property is permitted. Spare.
110 G-Z Series 111 Purpose:
Search, Detention and Arrest of Persons To regulate search, detention and/or arrest of persons during law enforcement related operations. Note: For search and detention of persons in non-law enforcement operations, refer to series 25 Search and Detention of Persons. Rule 111 A 111 B Search of (SPECIFY persons) is prohibited. Search of (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to search (SPECIFY persons) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Detention or arrest of persons is prohibited.
111 C 111 D
Detention of persons found committing a serious offense is permitted. Detention of persons found committing an offense is permitted. Detention of persons found escaping from having committed a serious offense is permitted. Arrest of persons found committing a serious offense is permitted. Arrest of persons found committing an offense is permitted. Arrest of persons reasonably believed to be about to commit a serious offense is permitted. Arrest of persons reasonably believed to be about to commit an offense is permitted. Arrest of persons reasonably believed to have committed a serious offense is permitted. Arrest of persons who are reasonably believed to have committed an offense is permitted. Spare.
111 F 111 G
111 H 111 I 111 J
111 N-Z Series 112 Purpose:
Treatment of Detained and Arrested Persons To regulate actions taken against persons who have been detained or arrested during law enforcement related operations. Note: For detention of persons in non-law enforcement operations, refer to Series 25 - Search and Detention of Persons. Rule 112 A Use of non-deadly force to search a detained or arrested person for weapons or other items that could pose a threat to the safety of any person is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to disarm (SPECIFY persons) is permitted. Use of (SPECIFY restraints e.g. handcuffs) on (SPECIFY persons) is permitted. Use of non-deadly force to prevent any (SPECIFY persons) from escaping is permitted.
112 B 112 C
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to prevent any (SPECIFY persons) from escaping is permitted. Spare.
112 F-Z Series 113-119 Series 120 Purpose: Spare
Crowd and Riot Control To regulate the use of force in riot control. Rule 120 A 120 B Use of force during riot control is prohibited. Use of non-deadly force circumstances) is permitted. during riot control in (SPECIFY
Use of force, up to and including deadly force, during riot control in (SPECIFY circumstances), is permitted. Spare.
120 D-Z Series 121 Purpose:
Riot Control Agents To regulate the use of riot control agents. Rule 121 A Use of (SPECIFY riot control agents, e.g. all) is prohibited in (SPECIFY circumstances). Use of (SPECIFY riot control agents) in (SPECIFY circumstances) is permitted. Spare.
121 C-Z Series 122 Purpose:
Riot Control Munitions/ Water Cannons To regulate the use of riot control munitions and use of water cannons Rule 122 A 122 B Use of riot control munitions is prohibited. Use of riot control munitions is permitted.
Use of (SPECIFY riot control munitions e.g. baton rounds, bean bags etc.) is permitted. Use of water cannons is prohibited. Use of water cannons is permitted. Spare.
122 D 122 E 122 F-Z Series 123-129 Spare
GROUP 130-139: INFORMATION OPERATIONS Series 130 Purpose: Electronic Warfare Measures To regulate the use of electronic warfare measures. Rule 130 A 130 B Use of electronic warfare measures is prohibited. Use of (SPECIFY electronic warfare measures) against (SPECIFY) is permitted. Use of electronic warfare measures is permitted. Spare.
130 C 130 D-Z Series 131
Computer Network Operations (Comprised of computer network attack, computer network defence, and related computer network exploitation enabling operations). To regulate the conduct of computer network operations. Rule 131 A 131 B Computer network attacks are prohibited. When authorised by (SPECIFY), computer network attacks to (SPECIFY effect, e.g. destroy, degrade, disrupt, deny) against (SPECIFY target system(s) - e.g. information on computers and or networks, or the computers and or networks themselves) of (SPECIFY target state, actor or system e.g. governmental systems, commercial systems, military systems) are permitted. When authorised by (SPECIFY), use of active computer network defence in response to unauthorised activity within friendly
information systems or computer networks is permitted. 131 D When authorised by (SPECIFY), computer network exploitation against (SPECIFY target) automated information systems or computer networks is permitted. Spare.
131 E-Z Series 132 Purpose:
Psychological Operations To regulate the use of psychological operations. Note: This Series is to be read with the relevant rules relating to Series 53 Relative Positioning of Force Units. Rule 132 A 132 B Psychological operations are prohibited. Psychological operations broadcasts to (SPECIFY target audience) over (SPECIFY medium e.g. radio channels, television channels, web pages) are permitted. Use of (SPECIFY method e.g. computer, email and telephone systems) to communicate approved messages to (SPECIFY approved target audiences) is permitted. Leaflet distribution permitted. Spare. to communicate approved messages is
Military Deception To regulate the use of military deception. Note: Perfidy is prohibited at all times. Rule 133 A 133 B Military deception is prohibited. When authorised by (SPECIFY), use of (SPECIFY physical military deception e.g. dummy or decoy equipment) against (SPECIFY) is permitted. When authorised by (SPECIFY), use of (SPECIFY technical means e.g. electronic deception) against (SPECIFY) is permitted.
When authorised by (SPECIFY), use of (SPECIFY administrative means e.g. convey/deny oral, pictorial, documentary, or other physical evidence) against (SPECIFY) is permitted. Spare.
133 E-Z Series 134 139 Spare
GROUP 140-149: OUTER SPACE OPERATIONS Series 140 Purpose: Interference With Satellite Communications To regulate interference against satellite communications. Rule 140 A 140 B Interference with satellite communications is prohibited. Interference with strategic early warning sensors and core communications systems is prohibited. Interference with communications for (SPECIFY satellite type e.g. communications, reconnaissance, global positioning etc.) belonging to (SPECIFY state/organisation) for (SPECIFY scope, intensity and duration of time) is permitted. Interference with communications for satellites belonging to (SPECIFY state/organisation) is permitted. Spare.
Neutralization/Destruction of Satellites To regulate actions taken to neutralise or destroy satellites. Rule 141 A 141 B Neutralization of satellites is prohibited. Neutralization of (SPECIFY satellite type e.g. communications, reconnaissance, navigation, global positioning etc.) belonging to (specify state/organisation) is permitted. Neutralization of (SPECIFY satellite type e.g. communications, reconnaissance, navigation, global positioning etc.) belonging to (SPECIFY state/organisation) for (SPECIFY scope, intensity and duration of time) is permitted.
141 D 141 E
Destruction of satellites is prohibited. Destruction of (SPECIFY satellite type e.g. communications, reconnaissance, navigation, global positioning, etc.) belonging to (SPECIFY state/organisation) is permitted. Spare.
141 F-Z Series 142-149 Spare
GROUP 150 plus: SPARE
Annex C
FORMATS FOR ROE AND ROE-RELATED MATERIALS 1. This Annex provides a selection of documents to serve as models. Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7 ROE Annex to OPORDER ROEREQ, ROEAUTH and ROEIMP Messages ROE Matrix for Multinational Operations ROE Cards Maritime Warning Zone Announcements Requests for Identification and Warnings Responses to Queries, Warnings and Challenges at Sea
2. These models are samples only. They may or may not be appropriate for any particular operation. If used, they must be tailored to the specific circumstances of the operation.
Appendix 1 to Annex C
ROE ANNEX TO OPORDER ROE ANNEX TO OPORDER FOR OPERATION RESTORE STABILITY MARITIME INTERDICTION OPERATIONS (MIO) References: A. UNSCR XXXX (20XX) B. Multi-National ROE Handbook 1. Reference A established sanctions against the nation of ALPHA. Military forces participating in OPERATION RESTORE STABILITY have been authorised to use all necessary means to enforce these sanctions. 2. OPERATION RESTORE STABILITY forces will conduct this operation in accordance with References A and B and the ROE implemented in this ROE directive. 3. Nothing in these ROE negates the right of individual self-defence. Nothing in these ROE negates a commanders right to take all necessary and appropriate action in unit self-defence. 4. The following ROE have been authorised for use by the Force when conducting the MIO within the Area of Operations: 10 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force in individual self-defence is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in unit self-defence of Operation RESTORE STABILITY units is permitted. Use of force, up to and including deadly force, for the protection of persons on boarded vessels is permitted.
20 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to accomplish the mission is permitted 23 C Firing of warning shots to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 24 B Use of disabling fire to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Operation Restore Stability. 55 H Ordering of diversions and other instructions to ships suspected of operating in breach of UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 93 G Non-compliant boarding of suspect ships in accordance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Multinational Force.
ROE REQUEST (ROEREQ), ROE AUTHORISATION (ROEAUTH), AND ROE IMPLEMENTATION (ROEIMP) MESSAGES 2.1 Introduction. The following types of formatted message may be used to request, authorise, or deny ROE: a. b. c. ROE Request (ROEREQ). ROE Authorisation or denial (ROEAUTH). ROE Implementation (ROEIMP).
ROEREQ and ROEAUTH messages should contain the entire text of each ROE being requested/authorised. Message formats are provided below. For each operation, each message should be numbered sequentially. 2.2 ROEREQ Messages. ROEREQ messages are used by a commander to seek the implementation, modification or cancellation of ROE by a superior commander. They can be originated by any commander in the operational chain of command. Each ROEREQ must include an explanation of why the ROE are required and the consequences should that ROE not be approved. 2.3 ROEAUTH Messages. ROEAUTH messages are used by the appropriate higher headquarters to authorise or deny ROE. Each message should be numbered sequentially. 2.4 ROEIMP Messages. ROEIMP messages are used by a commander to control the application of ROE that has been authorised by higher headquarters. It may contain additional guidance or restrictions, or may withhold certain ROE which has been authorised. 2.5 Amplification to ROE. Amplification (AMPN) are instructions contained within a ROEAUTH or ROEIMP message that provide additional information and guidance with respect to one or more of the ROE measures that have been authorised. Clarification for any or all of the ROE within any of these messages may be included in AMPN lines. 2.6 Message Formats. All ROEREQ, ROEAUTH and ROEIMP messages should be numbered sequentially (i.e. ROE REQUEST SERIAL ONE, ROE REQUEST SERIAL TWO, ROE REQUEST SERIAL THREE, etc.) and should include the following paragraphs: Paragraph 1 Background/justification. An explanation of why the ROE rules are being requested, authorised or denied. New rules requested or authorised. Previous measures cancelled (if any). Previous measures remaining in force (if any). Paragraph 4 must contain an accurate, up to date list of all authorised rules. Additional remarks (if any).
Paragraph 2 Paragraph 3 Paragraph 4
Each ROE message will contain all appropriate paragraphs so that commanders need only retain the latest message in order to have the complete current listing of all rules in force for the mission. If it is necessary to request or authorise ROE rules not found in the Compendium, the text of the requested rules should be set out in plain language in paragraph 2 of the ROE message utilizing an unassigned (SPARE) rule number from the most appropriate Series.
Sample ROEREQ message:
From Commander Operation Restore Stability To Commander Multinational Forces Info (Appropriate Information Addressees) Subj/ROEREQ Serial One/Operation Restore Stability Ref/A/ Multinational ROE Handbook 1. Background/justification: BRAVO warships are disrupting operations in relation to ALPHA by harassing Force units. BRAVO is allowing smuggling operations to be conducted in its territorial sea in violation of UNSCR XXXX. 2. New rules requested: 20 D 50 F Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to counter force used to interfere with the mission is permitted. Entry into the territorial sea of BRAVO to disrupt smuggling operations is permitted.
3. Previous rules cancelled: None. 4. Previous rules remaining in force: 10 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force in individual self-defence is permitted. 11 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in unit self-defence of Operation RESTORE STABILITY units is permitted. 12C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, for the protection of persons on boarded vessels is permitted. 20 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to accomplish the mission is permitted 23 C Firing of warning shots to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 24 B Use of disabling fire to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Operation Restore Stability. 55 H Ordering of diversions and other instructions to ships suspected of operating in breach of UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 93 G Non-compliant boarding of suspect ships in accordance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Multinational Force. 5. Additional remarks: Request approval of ROE rules 20 D and 50 F to facilitate effective MIO.
Sample ROEAUTH message:
From Commander Multinational Force To Commander Operation Restore Stability Info (appropriate information addressees) Subj/ROEAUTH Serial One/Operation Restore Stability Ref/A/ Commander Operation Restore Stability ROEREQ Serial One 1. Background/justification: Reference A requested new ROE measures to counter BRAVO interference with MIO operations. Rule 20C is authorised. Rule 50 F is not authorised. 2. New rule authorised: 20 D Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to counter force used to interfere with the mission is permitted.
3. Previous rules cancelled: None. 4. Previous rules remaining in force: 10 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force in individual self-defence is permitted. 11 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, in unit self-defence of Operation RESTORE STABILITY units is permitted. 12C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, for the protection of persons on boarded vessels is permitted. 20 C Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to accomplish the mission is permitted 23 C Firing of warning shots to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 24 B Use of disabling fire to compel compliance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Operation Restore Stability. 55 H Ordering of diversions and other instructions to ships suspected of operating in breach of UNSCR XXXX is permitted. 93 G Non-compliant boarding of suspect ships in accordance with UNSCR XXXX is permitted. AMPN: This rule is retained by Commander Multinational Force. 5. Additional remarks: 50 F (Entry into the territorial sea of BRAVO to disrupt smuggling operations is permitted.) is NOT authorised at this time due to pending diplomatic action by the UN Secretary General.
Sample ROEIMP message: From Commander Operation Restore Stability To Combined Task Force Restore Stability Info (appropriate information addressees) Subj/ROEAUTH Serial One/Operation Restore Stability Ref/A/ Commander Operation Restore Stability ROEREQ Serial One Ref/B/ Commander Multinational Force ROEAUTH Serial One 1. Background/justification: Reference A requested new ROE measures to counter BRAVO interference with MIO operations. Reference B responded to that request. Measure 20 D is authorised. Measure 50 F is not authorised. 2. New rule authorised: 20 D Use of force, up to and including deadly force, to counter force used to interfere with the mission is permitted.
ROE MATRIX FOR MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS 3.1 An ROE matrix provides a summary of the ROE rules in effect for each nation in a multinational force. The matrix provides a quick reference for planners and commanders in determining which unit or units may engage in specific actions. 3.2 This Appendix provides a sample matrix for maritime interdiction operations. Four participating nations (A, B, C, and D) are listed at the top of the matrix. ROE series are listed on the left side. A block with the word YES indicates the nations unit has the ROE rule available. A block with a footnoted YES indicates the nations unit has the ROE rule available, but with some limit or qualification listed in the footnote. A block with NO indicates the ROE rule is not available. Rule 11A 23A 24C 25B/J 93B 93E 93H ROE Unit self-defence of other nations units Warning shots Disabling Fire Search and Detention of Persons Compliant boarding Non-compliant boarding Opposed boarding Nation A YES YES (1) YES (1) YES (1) NO NO NO Nation B YES YES NO NO NO NO NO Nation C YES NO NO NO NO NO NO Nation D YES (1) YES YES YES (1) YES YES YES (2)
1. Only with permission from higher authority 2. Only if low threat of resistance
ROE CARDS 4.1 In general, ROE cards (sometimes referred to as soldiers cards) provide summaries of the key ROE principles regulating the use of force by individuals for a particular mission. They are not a substitute for training. 4.2 4.3 ROE cards must be concise and easy to understand. Model ROE cards are provided for 3 situations: a. b. c. Self-defence Peace Operations, and Armed Conflict, including a code of conduct.
4.4 The use of force in self-defence by individuals is governed by the domestic law of their nations. Cards issued to individuals must not authorise the use of force beyond that permitted by their domestic law.
SELF-DEFENCE CARD NOTHING IN YOUR ROE LIMITS YOUR RIGHT TO TAKE ACTION IN SELFDEFENCE. USE OF FORCE IN SELF-DEFENCE 1. You have the right to use force only in self-defence. 2. You may use force, up to and including deadly force, in response to a hostile act or hostile intent directed against: You Members of your unit (SPECIFY Other individuals) (Note: See ROE Group 10-19)
3. A warning is to be given before opening fire in self-defence, if time and circumstances permit. 4. You are to warn by shouting: (SPECIFY e.g. STOP OR I WILL FIRE). USE OF FORCE 5. If you have to open fire, you must: AND AND Fire only aimed shots Use no more force than is necessary to neutralise the threat Take all reasonable precautions not to injure anyone other than your target.
PEACE OPERATIONS CARD NOTHING IN YOUR ROE LIMITS YOUR RIGHT TO TAKE ACTION IN SELFDEFENCE. MISSION 1. Your Mission is (SPECIFY). USE OF FORCE IN SELF-DEFENCE 2. You have the right to use force in self-defence. 3. You may use force, up to and including deadly force, in response to a hostile act or hostile intent directed against: You Members of your unit (SPECIFY Other individuals) (Note: See ROE Group 10-19)
4. You may use necessary and proportional force, up to and including deadly force, in order to: (SPECIFY task)
ARMED CONFLICT CARD NOTHING IN YOUR ROE LIMITS YOUR RIGHT TO TAKE ACTION IN SELFDEFENCE. MISSION 1. Your Mission is (SPECIFY). 2. You have the right to use force both in self-defence and against the enemy. USE OF FORCE IN SELF-DEFENCE 3. You have the right to use force in self-defence at all times. 4. You may use force, up to and including deadly force, in response to a hostile act or hostile intent directed against: You Members of your unit (SPECIFY Other individuals) (Note: See ROE Group 10-19)
5. A warning is to be given before opening fire in self-defence, if time and circumstances permit. 6. You are to warn by shouting: (SPECIFY e.g. STOP OR I WILL FIRE). 7. If you have to open fire, you must: AND AND Fire only aimed shots Use no more force than is necessary to neutralise the threat Take all reasonable precautions not to injure anyone other than your target.
USE OF FORCE AGAINST THE ENEMY 8. Within (SPECIFY area), the following may be attacked: (SPECIFY military objectives and declared hostile forces) (Note: See ROE Group 30-39). 9. Minimize incidental injury or death of civilians and collateral damage to civilian objects.
CODE OF CONDUCT (REVERSE SIDE OF MODEL ARMED CONFLICT CARD) 1. Comply with the law of armed conflict and report suspected breaches to your superiors. 2. Do not attack those who surrender. Turn them over to your superiors. 3. Treat all detainees humanely. 4. Collect and care for all wounded, sick, and shipwrecked. 5. Respect civilians and their property. 6. Do not take war trophies.
MARITIME WARNING ZONE ANNOUNCEMENTS 5.1 Maritime Warning Zones are an operational issue. Properly established and appropriately implemented maritime warning zones provide operational commanders with the means to enhance the self-defence and force protection posture of their assets, and with the means to announce potential hazards to other users of the water space. However used, maritime warning zones cannot and do not absolve commanders of their responsibility for the safety of the forces they command or for their duty to comply with LOAC and other rules of international law. 5.2 Maritime Warning Zones are typically announced through a Notice to Mariners (NOTMAR), Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), or similar announcement. 5.3 Model announcements are provided for two types of zones: a. b. Warning Area in International Waters. Warning Area and Exclusion Zone in the Territorial Sea.
5.4 Where the term (SPECIFY) is included, detail must be inserted to clarify the meaning of the provision.
MODEL ANNOUNCEMENT - WARNING AREA 1. Due to (SPECIFY event or circumstances), (SPECIFY forces) are operating at a heightened state of readiness and taking additional defensive precautions against (SPECIFY threat). Consequently, all aircraft, surface vessels, and subsurface vessels approaching (SPECIFY object e.g. oil platform, warship) are requested to maintain radio contact with (SPECIFY force) on bridge-tobridge channel 16, international air distress (121.5 MHZ VHF) or military air distress (243.0 MHZ UHF). 2. (SPECIFY force) will take appropriate measures in self-defence if warranted by the circumstances. Aircraft, surface vessels, and subsurface vessels approaching (SPECIFY force) will, by making prior contact as described above, help make their intentions clear. 3. (SPECIFY force), when operating in confined waters, shall remain mindful of navigational considerations of aircraft, surface vessels, and subsurface vessels in their immediate vicinity. 4. Nothing in this warning is intended to impede or otherwise interfere with the freedom of navigation or overflight of any vessel or aircraft, or to limit or expand the right of self-defence of (SPECIFY force). This warning is published solely to advise of the heightened state of readiness of (SPECIFY force) and to request that radio contact be maintained as outlined above.
MODEL ANNOUNCEMENT WARNING AREA AND EXCLUSION ZONE IN THE TERRITORIAL SEA 1. A warning area and an exclusion zone, as described below, are established due to (SPECIFY event that lead to the declaration of the zones). 2. All mariners are advised to remain clear of (SPECIFY forces) and to identify themselves and make their intentions known when operating in the vicinity of (SPECIFY forces). If queried, mariners should clearly identify themselves and state their intentions and if given directions from (SPECIFY forces), they should promptly execute such directions so as to make their intentions known. Mariners are reminded that (SPECIFY forces) are prepared to take defensive measures, including if necessary the use of deadly force, against any contact whose identity or intentions are unknown and which poses a threat. 3. Effective immediately, a warning area is established around (SPECIFY geographic coordinates). 4. The warning area extends (SPECIFY distance) from (SPECIFY point). This warning area is distinct from and in addition to, the exclusion zone established later in this announcement. 5. Vessels are advised to remain clear of the warning area for all but essential transits. If transit requires entry into the zone, vessels are advised to contact (SPECIFY contact) via marine vhf channel 16, identify themselves and make transit intentions known. If (SPECIFY forces) advise a vessel to depart the warning area, the vessel should immediately depart. Such direction will be given only when necessary to keep the vessel from standing into danger. 6. Additionally, effective immediately, an exclusion zone is established, and the right of innocent passage is temporarily suspended in accordance with international law around (SPECIFY geographic coordinates) within (SPECIFY territorial sea). The exclusion zone extends (SPECIFY distance) from (SPECIFY point). 7. Only (SPECIFY vessels) and (SPECIFY forces) are allowed to enter the exclusion zone. Vessels attempting to enter the zone without authorisation may be subject to defensive measures, including when necessary, the use of deadly force. All reasonable efforts will be taken to warn vessels away before employing deadly force. However, deadly force will be employed when necessary. 8. Questions regarding this advisory may be directed to (SPECIFY point of contact and contact information).
REQUESTS FOR IDENTIFICATION AND WARNINGS 6.1 Where time and circumstances permit, forces or individuals presenting a threat should be warned and given the opportunity to withdraw or otherwise cease threatening actions. This appendix provides sample language for use in issuing such warnings. 6.2 Failure to respond to warnings may be considered as evidence of hostile intent.
6.3 In the maritime and air environments, requests for identification and warnings to aircraft are generally communicated via Military Air Distress (243 MHZ) and International Air Distress (121.5 MHZ) circuits. Warnings to surface ships are generally transmitted via Channel 16 bridge-to-bridge circuit. 6.4 Land operations examples: (SPECIFY identity)! Stop or I will fire! Attention! Unless you disperse/stop, I will use a (SPECIFY device) against you. 6.5 Air operations examples: Query: Attention, unidentified air contact (at SPECIFY position and IFF squawking SSR/call sign number___), at (SPECIFY altitude), you are approaching a (SPECIFY nation) (SPECIFY warship or military aircraft). Request you establish communications, identify yourself, and state your intentions. Warning: Unidentified (use identity if known) air contact (at SPECIFY position and squawking SSR/call sign number___), at (SPECIFY altitude), (SPECIFY course), and (SPECIFY) speed, you are approaching a (SPECIFY warship or military aircraft). Your (identity is unknown and/or your) intentions are not clear. You are standing into danger. Request you establish communications now or alter course immediately to (SPECIFY course) to remain clear. 6.6 Maritime examples: Query: Attention, unidentified surface (or submerged) contact (SPECIFY position), you are approaching a (SPECIFY nation) warship. Request you establish communications, identify yourself, and state your intentions. Warning: Unidentified (use identity if known) surface (or submerged) contact (at SPECIFY position and/or IFF squawk), at (SPECIFY course), and (SPECIFY speed), you are approaching a (SPECIFY warship or military aircraft). Your (identity is unknown and/or your) intentions are not clear. You are standing into danger. Request you establish communications now or alter course immediately to (SPECIFY course) to remain clear.
RESPONSES TO QUERIES, WARNINGS AND CHALLENGES AT SEA 7.1 This Appendix provides sample responses to queries or challenges received by warships and military aircraft in the maritime environment. 7.2 As a general rule, military units are authorised by national authorities to provide limited information in response to challenges or queries from foreign warships and military aircraft. Hull or side number, and course and speed are usually provided. Ship or aircraft type, name, previous ports of call, destination, current operations, and other information not related to the safe transit of the unit are not usually provided. 7.3 Suggested language for a response to a challenge: a. First part of the response should include This is (SPECIFY nationality) warship (or military aircraft) (SPECIFY number). b. Second part of the response depends on the location and transit mode of the unit. Options include: I am conducting routine operations in international waters. I am engaged in innocent passage. I am engaged in transit passage. I am engaged in archipelagic sea lanes passage. c. If asked for information not authorised for disclosure, the following response is suggested: This is (SPECIFY nationality) warship (or military aircraft) (SPECIFY number). I am not authorised to provide that information.
GLOSSARY anti-personnel mine a land mine designed to be exploded by the presence, proximity or contact of a person and that will incapacitate injure or kill one or more persons. Mines designed to be detonated by the presence, proximity, or contact of a vehicle (as opposed to a person) that are equipped with anti-handling devices, are not considered anti-personnel mines as a result of being so equipped. armed naval mine a naval mine laid either with all safety devices withdrawn or armed when laid so as to detonate when pre-set conditions are met. assistance entry the entry into the territorial sea by ships or aircraft without permission of the coastal state to engage in bona fide efforts to render emergency assistance to those in danger or distress at sea. This right applies only when the location of the danger or distress is reasonably well known. It does not extend to a search, which requires the consent of the coastal state. attack acts of violence or computer network attack in which there is a reasonable expectation that death, bodily harm or damage to property may occur. cluster munition in general, a conventional munition that is designed to disperse or release explosive submunitions with lethal effect. National definitions vary depending upon national policy and treaty obligations. compliant boarding a boarding where the master and crew of the vessel cooperate. computer network attack actions taken through the use of computer networks to disrupt, deny, degrade, or destroy information resident in computers and computer networks, or the computers and networks themselves. Also called CNA. computer network defence actions taken through the use of computer networks to protect, monitor, analyse, detect and respond to unauthorised activity within information systems and computer networks. Also called CND. computer network exploitation enabling operations and intelligence collection capabilities conducted through the use of computer networks to gather data from target or adversary automated information systems or networks. Also called CNE. computer network operations comprised of computer network attack, computer network defence, and related computer network exploitation enabling operations. Also called CNO. controlled naval mine a naval mine with no destructive capability until affirmatively activated by some form of arming order (whereupon they become armed naval mines). counter-terrorist warning boom device placed in the water around ships to warn and prevent small vessels from approaching the ship. cyberspace a global domain characterised by the use of electronics and the electromagnetic spectrum to store, modify and exchange data via networked systems including the internet, telecommunications systems, and associated infrastructure.
deadly force force intended or likely to cause death, or serious injury resulting in death, regardless of whether death or serious injury results. declared hostile force any civilian, paramilitary, or military force or terrorist organisation that has been declared hostile by appropriate authority. detention the act of holding a person against their will for lawful purposes such as prosecution, maintenance of public safety, or pursuant to a lawful order. direct fire fire directed at a target that is visible to the aimer. The target itself is used as a point of aim for either the weapon or the director. disabling fire fire directed at a vessel, aircraft or vehicle so as to impair its manoeuvrability but not its survival. electronic warfare a core capability of information operations that includes any military action involving the use of electromagnetic and directed energy to control the electromagnetic spectrum, to protect personnel, facilities, and equipment, or to attack the enemy. Also called EW. exclusion zone a zone established by a sanctioning body to prohibit specific activities in a specific geographic area. See also maritime warning zone and warning area. fighters members of armed forces and dissident armed forces or other armed groups participating in a non-international armed conflict. Force the military unit or organisation operating under these Rules of Engagement. For purposes of self defence, Force includes persons accompanying the Force, Prisoners of War, internees and detainees under the control of the Force. force protection actions taken to prevent or mitigate hostile actions against personnel (to include family members), resources, facilities, and critical information. force protection does not include actions to defeat the enemy or protect against accidents, weather, or disease. higher authority authority within a nation that is senior to the commander of the Force or units of the Force. hostile act an attack or other use of force against a nation, the Force or other designated persons or property. hostile intent the threat of an imminent hostile act. host nation a nation that receives with its consent the forces and/or supplies of allied nations, and/or coalition partners, to be located on, to operate in, or to transit through its territory. indirect fire fire directed at a target that cannot be seen by the aimer and that is not itself used as a point of aim for the weapons or the director. Indirect fire includes observed indirect fire and unobserved indirect fire.
individual self-defence the right of an individual to defend himself or herself (and in some cases other individuals) from hostile act or hostile intent. information operations the integrated employment of the core capabilities of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own. Also called IO. international airspace airspace over the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and territories not subject to national sovereignty. international waters all ocean areas not subject to the sovereignty of a nation. All waters seaward from the territorial sea are international waters in which high seas freedoms of navigation and overflight are reserved to the international community. International waters include only contiguous zones, exclusive economic zones, and high seas. joint activities, operations organisations, etc, in which two or more armed services participate. maritime interdiction operations operations to enforce restrictions on the movement of persons/material on and over the maritime environment within a defined geographical area. maritime warning zone a designated ocean area and superjacent air space in which a nation purports to restrict the freedom of navigation and/or overflight of other users or otherwise impacts the exercise of those freedoms. See also exclusion zone and warning area, which are types of maritime warning zones. marking to maintain contact of a target from such a position that the marking unit or marker has an immediate offensive capability. military deception actions executed to deliberately mislead adversary military decision makers as to friendly military capabilities, intentions, and operations, thereby causing the adversary to take specific actions (or inactions) that will contribute to the accomplishment of the friendly forces mission. national self-defence the defence of a nation, a nations forces, and a nations persons and their property. Generally, unit commanders may exercise the right of national self-defence only when authorised by higher authority. national airspace airspace above the territory, internal waters, territorial sea, and archipelagic waters of nations. national waters waters subject to the territorial sovereignty of coastal nations. National waters include only internal waters, territorial seas, and archipelagic waters. naval mines an explosive device laid in the water, on the sea bed or in the subsoil thereof, with the intention of damaging or sinking ships or of deterring ships from entering an area.
neutralise to render ineffective, either temporarily or permanently. non-combatant evacuation operations operations directed by national authority whereby non-combatants are evacuated from foreign countries to safe havens when their lives are endangered by war, civil unrest, or natural disaster.. non-compliant boarding a boarding where agreement to board has not been obtained. non-deadly force force not intended or likely to cause death, or serious injury resulting in death. observed indirect fire indirect fire for which the point of impact or burst can be seen by an observer. The fire can be controlled and adjusted on the basis of observation. opposed boarding a boarding where the master or crew has made it clear that steps will be taken to prevent the boarding. outer space this region begins at the undefined upper limit of national airspace and extends to infinity. International law recognises freedom of transit by man-made satellites and other objects at earth orbiting altitude and beyond. peace operations a broad term that encompasses conflict prevention, peacebuilding, peacekeeping, peacemaking and peace enforcement operations conducted in support of efforts to establish or maintain peace. perfidy the use of unlawful deceptions. Acts of perfidy are deceptions designed to invite the confidence of the enemy to believe that protected status under the law of armed conflict must be accorded, with the intent to betray that confidence. Feigning surrender in order to lure the enemy into a trap is one example of an act of perfidy. National LOAC manuals should be consulted for more detailed definitions and examples. piracy an illegal act of violence, depredation (e.g. plundering, robbing, or pillaging), or detention in or over international waters committed for private ends by the crew or passengers of a private ship or aircraft against another ship or aircraft or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft. psychological operations planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to target audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behaviour of governments, organisations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or reinforce attitudes and behaviour favourable to the originators objectives. self-defence the use of necessary and proportional force, including deadly force, to defend forces, personnel, or property against attack or imminent attack. serious crime murder, rape, aggravated assault or any other crime that could reasonably be expected to kill or cause serious bodily harm. shadowing observing and (not necessarily continuously) maintaining contact with an object.
Shadowing may be carried out either overtly or covertly. status of forces agreement (SOFA) an agreement that defines the legal position of a visiting military force deployed in the territory of another state. unit self-defence the right of unit commanders to defend their unit, other units of their nation, and other specified units against hostile act or hostile intent. unobserved indirect fire indirect fire for which points of impact or burst are not observed. warning area an announcement that provides notice of potential hazards at sea, such as weapons testing, exercises, combat, or other operations. See also exclusion zone and maritime warning zone. warning shot a shot fired in the vicinity of a person, vessel, or aircraft as a signal to immediately cease activity, but not intended to cause damage or injury.
The International Institute of Humanitarian Law is an independent, non-profit humanitarian organisation founded in 1970. Its headquarters are situated in Villa Ormond, Sanremo (Italy). The main purpose of the Institute is to promote international humanitarian law, human rights, refugee law and related issues. The Institute has earned an international reputation as a centre of excellence in the field of training, research and the dissemination of all aspects of international humanitarian law. The Institute works in close collaboration with a large number of important international organisations dedicated to the humanitarian cause, including the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). It has operational relations with the EU, UNESCO, NATO, OIF (Organisation internationale de la francophonie), the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and the Istituto Italo-Latino Americano (IILA). It has consultative status with the United Nations (ECOSOC) and the Council of Europe. The Institutes finances are drawn largely from membership fees, course participant fees, voluntary contributions by Governments, Institutions or Organisations, and subsidies, bequests or donations. The financial resources of the Institute are modest when compared with the extent of its commitment and activity in a field of increasing interest to the international community.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HUMANITARIAN LAW Villa Ormond, Corso Cavallotti 113, 18038 Sanremo - Italy Tel. +39 0184 541848 - Fax +39 0184 541600 web site: www.iihl.org email: sanremo@iihl.org
Sécurité nationale
Documents similaires à Roe Handbook Eng May 2011 Print Run
Ahmad Afandi
Abhi Jit
Kumar Sundaram
janjan Rimando
trafalgar council
singhsingh
Misha Sewaramani
gkkottireddy
nigam_mugdha
Herald Masih
PennLive
Austin Ebner
Livewire Printing Company
Paris Torres
New Orleans v. Gaines, 82 U.S. 624 (1873)
DS Credit Application Form (Local) - Improchem (Pty) Ltd.pdf
PDS Queenie Cusay
QUEENIE CUSAY
Political Law Review Sandoval
Ces Lo
Authorization Letter
Paulyn Bildan
13. the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2012 Gp2
Guru Prasad
2 Ojt. MOA.pialago
Marites Mayo Cuyos
recommendation savannah harwood 1
Test Assignment
Amardeep Singh
Omax Autos - Pick of the Week - 090418
Rasmi Ranjan
Circumpolar Adaptation, Social Change, and the Development of Autoimmune Thyroid Disorders Among the Yakut (Sakha) of Siberia
Cromiron
NEW PPT
Prashant Rangavajjula
Dark Heresy Combat Reference
redbenjamin89
GTI Trenching & Shoring
Ravikant Pandey
ZEN PHYSICS- The Science of Death- The Logic of Reincarnation -David Darling _complete Book
ziggystardani
fora_400_e
nedunchi
Cisco Campus network 1.0 Design Guide
Ashmar Kalangottil
ISO 27001 Audit Guideline v1.docx
budi.hw748
FM - Chapter 15
Rahul Shrivastava
Computer Numerical Control Ip 710
vajram1
Rollover Prevention Guide
asarekofi_2005
Amdavad ni Guf1.docx
Siva Raman
The Integrative Action of the Nervous Sy
eatman96
Sea FuryTest
howlettalexander
Understanding Research
Parlindungan Pardede
Bendix_Quick Reference Catalog
stainless31620039126
1.3.1.3 Packet Tracer - Skills Integration Challenge
Daniel Díaz Sánchez
07.July - Part 1 - 2017 - Current Analyst - GS Score
hh ricky
Actualizacion de IOS (6500)
lorenzo019
Notice: Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals
Manuale Deja Vu X2
Kalle Bergström
Andhra Pradesh Budget Analysis 2018-19
prasad gujjula
Raffii Hyder
Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, Volume 2
Teresa Mata
19-20 dual enrollment parent night
LinhXuânPhạm
2009 CMS 01 Nickel Sulf v Lat
Ell HaKim ERdha