Recordkeeping and Reporting Related to E15
E15, Ethanol, survey Complex Model, 10 volume percent (vol%)  ethanol, 15 vol% ethanol (E15) retail stations, Product  misfueling, label, gasoline blend Reid vapor Pressure (RVP)
2019-03-27 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-03-29 2019-04-01
EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0012 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0023 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0028 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0040 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0056 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0058 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0063 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0065 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0066 EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0088
04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00
https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0012 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0023 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0028 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0040 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0056 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0058 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0063 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0065 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0066 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0202-0088
Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous
Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous
To Whom it may concern  As a retiree on limited income I find it very troubling that you are even considering this for approval for summer use especiallyin the marine industry with recreational boaters. This fuel is known and proven to destroy motors on vessels as it eats thru certainparts of the motor and supply lines that feed fuel to our motors. That being said also will cause extremely hazardous conditions when fueling. God forbid one of the fuel lines rupture and fuel gets into the bilge causing explosive conditions.The E10 that we purchase currently is bad enough and has proven to be costly to me already and I can only imagine the effects that this E15 would have.    I reach out to you on behalf of all boaters in the same position as I to turn down the E15 regulation . As a boater , I have enough to worry about with the fuel I am forced to use at the current time.I remainGeorge Meissler Jr2966 Wexford roadBensalem,Pa., 19020mousey10850@verizon.net I am not in favor of E15, It has not been proven to be a good option for most cars and trucks. Im totally against the increase of ethonal fuel sold here in pa. It is very detrimental to 2 stroke engines and the like , and straight gasoline is not a available just anywhere to be had. I am against any ethanol in gasoline, let alone 15%. I am also against any subsidization of the ethanol industry. That is called crony-capitalism. With all due respect, I am also against un-elected bureaucrats enacting rules and regulations. I am afraid that it doesnt matter what people like me think, administrative agencies are going to do what the political agenda bureaucrats in these agencies want to do anyway. I live in South Dakota having the ability for our farmers to sell corn for ethanol would be huge boost to our economy. It would also help a lot with gasoline prices especially during the summer and the prices spike so much. I feel we only need to have labeling on the pumps to explain people which vehicles are authorized to which ones are not an allowed to sell all year round Please do away with E-85 fuel. Last summer I couldnt buy any fuel for my Harley motorcycle and put this into my bike to get me to another station. It eat up all my rubber gaskets and ruined my engine. Now I have a $5000 boat anchor. It would be nice to send you that bill. Do away with this harmful fuel. Use the corn to feed the people. Just gas is way more efficient to run vechicals and we should of never been forced to use E-85 fuel in the first place. Thank you,Neil DeWitt  I am all for less regulation of ethanol sales, among other things.  If this can help reduce the subsidies (welfare) that the growers require to produce the ethanol, this is definitely a step in the right direction.  However, if the plan is to funnel more subsidies (welfare) to the growers because they are losing money, perhaps the ethanol fuel needs dropped in favor of the growers producing cash yielding crops and lessening their dependence on tax payer monies.  For instance, if the growers were to grow corn for distilling into spirits instead of fuel, perhaps that would reduce or eliminate the need for subsidies (welfare).As a consumer, my benefit from ethanol is supposed to be lower gasoline prices on the blended fuels.  In western South Dakota, a lot of stations are marginally lower and sometimes the same price.  The last estimate I heard was there should be a $0.14 per gallon difference in E-10, but that was many years ago.  I see around $0.10 at best, but thats a rare occasion.  Its time to stop wasting time, resources and money.  Actually, it has been that time for decades.  Now do it! i am against e15.  it ruins car engines Thank you for allowing comments on this exciting opportunity, please go forward with the year round sales of E-15, it is a win-win situation for all involved. Growing corn for fuel defies common sense.  It still requires fossil fuels to harvest and is incompatible with all 3 of my vehicles; model year 1983, 2004, and 2007.  It is NOT better for environment when the water required for processing is considered.  It also requires yet more effort and therefore more cost to ship another type of fuel.  The United States would be a much better place without the socialist construct of forcing everyone to subsidize farmers for growing this crop.  