Increase in Tax Rates on Tobacco Products and Cigarette Papers and Tubes; Floor Stocks Tax on Certain Tobacco Products, Cigarette Papers, and Cigarette Tubes; and Changes to Basis for Denial, Suspension, or Revocation of Permits
tobacco cigarettes cigars pipe tobacco chewing tobacco snuff roll your own excise taxes exports imports recordkeeping tobacco products floor stocks tax permits health insurance CHIPRA
2009-06-05 2009-06-05 2009-06-05 2009-06-05 2009-06-05 2009-06-05
TTB-2009-0001-0006 TTB-2009-0001-0003 TTB-2009-0001-0007 TTB-2009-0001-0005 TTB-2009-0001-0008 TTB-2009-0001-0004
04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00 04:00:00
https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0006 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0003 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0007 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0005 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0008 https://api.regulations.gov/v4/comments/TTB-2009-0001-0004
Keith Patrick Geoffrey Linda Cheryl Kevin
Anderson Shipp Ranck Tesch Healton Reynolds
how come certain people end up paying for for this schip program and others dont pay one cent. this schip program is a way to stuff the states pockets with cash.what did the states do with all that tobacco settelment which was in the billons of dollars besides buying paintings and landscaping the state capital and a host of other bullshit. you need to have agi pay the this outrageous tax with the so called bailout.because thats what they did.bailed out and left the country.but obama will find away to tax something to pay for that to.trillon dollars going to bailingout the auto ind. then end up filing bankrupcy. what a bunch of idiots.   This rule proposes to tax cigarette rolling papers. How does this tax impact people who purchase cigarette rolling papers for marijuana use? It seems this would be taxing marijuana use and not tobacco use? Cigarette rolling papers are not commonly referred to as a cause of cancer.Please clarify what is a cigarette tube?Why are pipes, water pipes, hukahs, evaporators, and other smoking devices not taxed as well? It does not seem to be good policy to only target one delivery system and not all systems. Comments ;    Their needs to be a seperate line for all cigar tobaccos , filler ,binder and cigar wrapps  WRAPPER  Blunt Wraps . This is cigar tobacco not cigarette tobacco. You have put this into RYO but it needs its own line item.  All the information collected to April 1 2009 , is just cigarette tobacco this information must be kept clean. It is used for the Dept of Ag. , MSA , and TTB.  On TTB form5220.6 (07/2007) on the right margen their is enough space to put an extra line. Have them mark it RYO Cigar Wrap  and keep it clean. Also in the future it would be good to review with the industry befor the final rules are completed. THANK YOUGeoffrey H. RanckPS  call me. I strenuously object to the OBAMA tax on tobacco and cigarettes. During difficult times when people are so short on money in the first place, you very significantly target a select group of people and tell me what is good for me. I dont have insurance on myself and your decision is to make me pay for insurance on a child that is not even mine to support. And you give me no choice in the matter. You pass a bill that demands that I pay a tax on a product that is legal citing all matter of literature about the health aspects of smoking cessation. When will you pass a bill on the obese. You want to generate income, thats your target demographic. There is the revenue you need to support the uninsured children of the United States Obseity is the leading cause of disease in the United States. Smokers have been under attack for a long time. Its time to cease the madness. American Legacy Foundation1724 Massachusetts Avenue, NWWashington, D.C. 20036 Comments Submitted on May 29, 200927 CFR Parts 40, 41, 44, 46, and 71Docket No. TTB-2009-0001Notice No. 93RE: T.D. TTB-75To the Director, Regulations and Rulings DivisionAlcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau1310 G Street, NW, Suite 200-#Washington, DC 20005The American Legacy Foundation (Legacy) is pleased to submit these comments in support of the proposed regulations by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) regarding the increase in tax rates on tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes; floor stocks tax on certain tobacco products; cigarette papers and cigarette tubes; and changes to the basis for denial suspension or revocation of permits.  Legacy is a national, independent public health foundation created in 1998 out of the landmark Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the tobacco industry, 46 state governments and five U.S. territories. Our mission is to build a world where young people reject tobacco and anyone can quit.  Legacy does not lobby or take positions on specific legislation.  Our programs include:  truth - A national youth smoking prevention media campaign responsible for preventing approximately 450,000 youth from beginning to smoke in its first four years(1)EX - An innovative smoking cessation public education campaign designed to help smokers re-learn life without cigarettes. Research Initiatives  Examining the various causes and effects of tobacco use in the United States.   Outreach to Priority Populations  Priority Populations Initiatives and grants provide critical interventions using methods that are culturally competent and tailored for the specific needs of communities disproportionately affected by the toll of tobacco. Legacy applauds TTB for promptly publishing for public comment proposed regulations to carry out the Childrens Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) and increase the excise taxes on tobacco products.  Legacy has long supported increases in excise taxes on tobacco products, as well as tax parity between cigarettes and cigar products, as part of a comprehensive tobacco control program.  Excise tax increases can serve to both increase revenues for prevention and cessation services as well as decrease tobacco consumption.  Increasing taxes on tobacco is one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco use.(2,3,4)  Increased taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products make them more expensive, and as a result, youth are discouraged from smoking(5) and adult smokers are more likely to quit.(6)  TTBs effort to devise these regulations is commendable.  We believe that the proposal would properly implement the CHIPRA amendments and should be adopted as the final regulation. However, more needs to be done. We encourage the Bureau to: 1. pursue tax parity between cigarettes and all cigar products; and 2. create a standard definition of cigarillos and improve the reporting of information to the public regarding the sales of different types of large cigar products. First, there should be tax parity between all cigar products and cigarettes.  CHIPRA, and the regulations that TTB has proposed, do create federal tax parity between cigarettes and small cigars, which mimic cigarettes except that they are wrapped in tobacco leaf instead of paper, taxing them both at approximately $1.01 per pack.  However, all other cigar products, including traditional large cigars and cigarillos, are taxed as a percentage of their manufacturers price. (Cigarillos are also called cheroots or blunts.  We will refer to these products collectively as cigarillos.)  Some large cigars and cigarillos, particularly those that are more expensive, are taxed at significantly lower rates than cigarettes and small cigars, because the tax is capped at $0.40. There is also concern that, at the low end of the scale, tobacco companies may be able to reduce the impact of the new, higher taxes by manipulating the weight of their cigar products. Consider, for example, a little cigar product with a manufacturers price of $0.75 per 20 little cigars.  Under the new rules the tax per pack would be $1.0l.  However, the manufacturer could lower that tax to $0.39 per pack simply by slightly increasing the size of their little cigars so that they would be classified as large cigars.  It appears this has occurred: On the same day that CHIPRA went into effect (April 1, 2009), the brands Santa Fe, King Edward, and Blackstone changed their products from little cigars to cigars. (7)  While this may not be illegal, the manufacturers are clearly gaming the system to receive the most preferential tax treatment and keep the prices of their products low.These differential rates fly in the face of sound policy. All cigars, just like cigarettes, cause lung, oral, laryngeal, and esophageal cancers, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).(8)   The disproportionately low tax on some cigars and cigarillos maintains their price advantage, which could increase their rate of consumption(9,10) and, in particular, make them more appealing to youth.   Indeed, these products are increasing in popularity.   Consumption of little cigars has increased by 240% while cigarillo consumption increased by almost 150% between 1997 and 2007. At the same time, typical large cigar consumption decreased by 6%.(9) Second, the Bureaus reporting of information regarding sales of large cigars does not differentiate between typical large cigars, or stogies and cigarillos.  This makes it difficult to definitively track the consumption rate of cigarillos although available data suggests that it is rising. The problem is compounded by the fact that there is no standard definition of cigarillos, making it difficult to accurately compare the data and reports that do exist.   More refined information would make a valuable contribution to both tax and public health policy. We encourage TTB to define cigarillos, perhaps by reference to its previous definition of cigarillos as large cigars weighing 3  10 pound per thousand,(11) and collect and publish data based on its definition. We would note that the United States Department of Agriculture uses this definition although it does not provide reports regarding consumption. We would also note that TTB already tracks and provides information on two different price categories of large cigars (Class A-G, and Class H).(12)  In closing, Legacy is pleased that these taxes on tobacco products were raised by CHIPRA and that TTB has taken appropriate and timely steps to assure that they are collected.  We look forward to working with TTB on the additional issues we have raised.  If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Stephenie Foster, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, at 202-454-5559 or sfoster@americanlegacy.org.Endnotes: (1) Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker J, Davis KC, Hussin A. The Influence of the National truth Campaign on Smoking Initiation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009; 36(5): 379-384.(2) IOM (Institute of Medicine). Ending the Tobacco Problem: a Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.  2007.(3) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2000.  (4) The World Bank. Curbing the Epidemic:Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. 1999; Washington, DC. Chapter 4: Measures to Reduce the Demand for Tobacco. (5) Carpenter C, Cook PJ. Cigarette taxes and youth smoking: New evidence from national, state, and local Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. Journal of Health Economics, 2008; 27:287-299. (6) Levy DT, Romano E, Mumford E. The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2005; 7(3): 387-396. (7) Per phone conversation with Swisher International representative on May 28, 2009(8) National Cancer Institute. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 9: Cigars: Health Effects and Trends. National Institutes of Health, 1998. (9)  Maxwell JC. The Maxwell Report: Cigar Industry in 2007. Richmond, VA: John C. Maxwell, Jr. 2008. Original concept in Kozlowski LT, Dollar KM, Giovino GA. Cigar/cigarillo surveillance: limitations of the U.S. Department of Agriculture system. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008; 34(5); 424-6.(10) Ringel J, Wasserman J, Andreyeva T. Effects of public policy on adolescents cigar use: evidence from the National Youth Tobacco Survey.  American Journal of Public Health, 2005; 95: 995-998; Delnevo C, Hrywna M, Foulds J, Steinberg M. Cigar use before and after a cigarette excise tax increase in New Jersey. Addictive Behavior. 2004; 29: 1799-1807; Delnevo C, Foulds J, Hrywna M. Trading tobacco: are youths choosing cigars over cigarettes? American Journal of Public Health, 2005; 95: 2123.(11) TTB Industry Circular Number: 69-11, Reconstituted Tobacco As Wrapper for Rolls of Tobacco, April 3, 1969.  Found at: http://www.ttb.gov/industry_circulars/archives/1969/69-11.html.  Accessed on May 27, 2009.(12) 27 CFR Parts 40 and 275 OK.  I know Im not going to get honesty here, (if I get anything at all, other than an investigation) but Ill ask the question anyway:Whats the real reason for this increase?According to your Industry Circular (http://www.ttb.gov/industry_circulars/archives/2009/ic2009_01.html) for Roll-Your-Own Tobacco2 (which is what I smoke) the tax has gone from $1.0969 per pound to $24.78 per pound.  As you state that is a $23.6831 per pound increase.  I ask again: What is the real reason for a 2,259.09 percent increase in these taxes?I see that the increase for pipe tobacco went from the same $1.0969 per pound as my Roll-Your-Own, to $2.8311 per pound, a mere 258.1 percent increase.  I guess you consider pipe smokers to be of a higher class than us Roll-Your-Own smokers.  Something is not right in whats going on here.I do not believe this has anything to do with the Childrens Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (the Act, Pub. L. 111-3).  That is merely the vehicle you decided to use for your other actual reasons.  I do not believe this has anything to do with childrens health.  I believe something else is going on and I am sure it has much more to do with you stealing my money.  It is plain and simple theft.This is just another large pile of manure I am seeing more and more from my government.  However, in this particular case, it is a 2,259.09 percent increase in the amount of manure I am use to and thus is the reason for this comment on this latest attack on the ever more tax paying citizens of this country.