prompt: You will be provided with a partial code base and an issue statement explaining a problem to resolve.
  <issue>
  Consistent semantic versioning
  ## Summary
  
  The most recent version of Pyomo released was 6.2, as opposed to 6.2.0. It seems inconsistent with the way many other packages are versioned (e.g. NumFocus packages), although I am unaware if there is a standard specified anywhere. Is there a benefit to the former as opposed to the latter? 
  
  ## Context
  
  Managing our dependencies, we automate pulling in new versions of packages, running them through our CI prior to upgrading. We run this in two ways - one allowing all upgrades and one allowing only compatible upgrades (PEP 440). This always requires manual review because not all packages use semantic versioning (or the same semantic versioning). One manual override we had to apply this time was pinning `Pyomo ~= 6.2.0` instead of what our script automatically pulled in `Pyomo ~= 6.2`.
  Consistent semantic versioning
  ## Summary
  
  The most recent version of Pyomo released was 6.2, as opposed to 6.2.0. It seems inconsistent with the way many other packages are versioned (e.g. NumFocus packages), although I am unaware if there is a standard specified anywhere. Is there a benefit to the former as opposed to the latter? 
  
  ## Context
  
  Managing our dependencies, we automate pulling in new versions of packages, running them through our CI prior to upgrading. We run this in two ways - one allowing all upgrades and one allowing only compatible upgrades (PEP 440). This always requires manual review because not all packages use semantic versioning (or the same semantic versioning). One manual override we had to apply this time was pinning `Pyomo ~= 6.2.0` instead of what our script automatically pulled in `Pyomo ~= 6.2`.
  
  </issue>
  <code>
  [start of pyomo/version/info.py]
  1 #  ___________________________________________________________________________
  2 #
  3 #  Pyomo: Python Optimization Modeling Objects
  4 #  Copyright 2017 National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
  5 #  Under the terms of Contract DE-NA0003525 with National Technology and 
  6 #  Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, the U.S. Government retains certain 
  7 #  rights in this software.
  8 #  This software is distributed under the 3-clause BSD License.
  9 #  ___________________________________________________________________________
  10 
  11 _init_url="$URL$"
  12 
  13 # NOTE: releaselevel should be left at 'invalid' for trunk development
  14 #     and set to 'final' for releases.  During development, the
  15 #     major.minor.micro should point ot the NEXT release (generally, the
  16 #     next micro release after the current release).
  17 #
  18 # Note: When cutting a release, also update the major/minor/micro in
  19 #
  20 #     pyomo/RELEASE.txt
  21 #
  22 # The VOTD zipbuilder will automatically change releaselevel to "VOTD
  23 # {hash}" and set the serial number to YYMMDDhhmm.  The serial number
  24 # should generally be left at 0, unless a downstream package is tracking
  25 # main and needs a hard reference to "suitably new" development.
  26 major=6
  27 minor=2
  28 micro=1
  29 releaselevel='invalid'
  30 #releaselevel='final'
  31 serial=0
  32 
  33 if releaselevel == 'final':
  34     pass
  35 elif '/tags/' in _init_url:                #pragma:nocover
  36     releaselevel = 'final'
  37 elif releaselevel == 'invalid':
  38     from os.path import abspath, dirname, exists, join
  39     if __file__.endswith('setup.py'):
  40         # This file is being sources (exec'ed) from setup.py.
  41         # dirname(__file__) setup.py's scope is the root sourec directory
  42         _rootdir = os.path.dirname(__file__)
  43     else:
  44         # Eventually this should import PYOMO_ROOT_DIR from
  45         # pyomo.common instead of reimplementing that logic here.
  46         #
  47         # __file__ fails if script is called in different ways on Windows
  48         # __file__ fails if someone does os.chdir() before
  49         # sys.argv[0] also fails because it doesn't not always contains the path
  50         from inspect import getfile, currentframe
  51         _rootdir = join(dirname(abspath(getfile(currentframe()))), '..', '..')
  52 
  53     if exists(join(_rootdir, '.git')):
  54         try:
  55             with open(join(_rootdir, '.git', 'HEAD')) as _FILE:
  56                 _ref = _FILE.readline().strip()           #pragma:nocover
  57             releaselevel = 'devel {%s}' % (
  58                 _ref.split('/')[-1].split('\\')[-1], )    #pragma:nocover
  59         except:
  60             releaselevel = 'devel'         #pragma:nocover
  61     elif exists(join(_rootdir, '.svn')):
  62         releaselevel = 'devel {svn}'       #pragma:nocover
  63     else:
  64         releaselevel = 'VOTD'              #pragma:nocover
  65 
  66 
  67 version_info = (major, minor, micro, releaselevel, serial)
  68 
  69 version = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:(3 if micro else 2)])
  70 __version__ = version
  71 if releaselevel != 'final':
  72     version += ' ('+releaselevel+')'
  73 if releaselevel.startswith('devel'):
  74     __version__ += ".dev%d" % (serial,)
  75 elif releaselevel.startswith('VOTD'):
  76     __version__ += "a%d" % (serial,)
  77
  [end of pyomo/version/info.py]
  </code>
  
  I need you to solve this issue by generating a single patch file that I can apply directly to this repository using git apply. Please respond with a single patch file in the following format.
  <patch>
  diff --git a/file.py b/file.py
  --- a/file.py
  +++ b/file.py
  @@ -1,27 +1,35 @@
   def euclidean(a, b):
  -    while b:
  -        a, b = b, a % b
  -    return a
  +    if b == 0:
  +        return a
  +    return euclidean(b, a % b)
   
   
   def bresenham(x0, y0, x1, y1):
       points = []
       dx = abs(x1 - x0)
       dy = abs(y1 - y0)
  -    sx = 1 if x0 < x1 else -1
  -    sy = 1 if y0 < y1 else -1
  -    err = dx - dy
  +    x, y = x0, y0
  +    sx = -1 if x0 > x1 else 1
  +    sy = -1 if y0 > y1 else 1
   
  -    while True:
  -        points.append((x0, y0))
  -        if x0 == x1 and y0 == y1:
  -            break
  -        e2 = 2 * err
  -        if e2 > -dy:
  -            err -= dy
  -            x0 += sx
  -        if e2 < dx:
  -            err += dx
  -            y0 += sy
  +    if dx > dy:
  +        err = dx / 2.0
  +        while x != x1:
  +            points.append((x, y))
  +            err -= dy
  +            if err < 0:
  +                y += sy
  +                err += dx
  +            x += sx
  +    else:
  +        err = dy / 2.0
  +        while y != y1:
  +            points.append((x, y))
  +            err -= dx
  +            if err < 0:
  +                x += sx
  +                err += dy
  +            y += sy
  +
  +    points.append((x, y))
       return points
  
  </patch>
golden_diff: diff --git a/pyomo/version/info.py b/pyomo/version/info.py
  --- a/pyomo/version/info.py
  +++ b/pyomo/version/info.py
  @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
   
   version_info = (major, minor, micro, releaselevel, serial)
   
  -version = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:(3 if micro else 2)])
  +version = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:3])
   __version__ = version
   if releaselevel != 'final':
       version += ' ('+releaselevel+')'
  
verification_info: {"golden_diff": "diff --git a/pyomo/version/info.py b/pyomo/version/info.py\n--- a/pyomo/version/info.py\n+++ b/pyomo/version/info.py\n@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@\n \n version_info = (major, minor, micro, releaselevel, serial)\n \n-version = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:(3 if micro else 2)])\n+version = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:3])\n __version__ = version\n if releaselevel != 'final':\n     version += ' ('+releaselevel+')'\n", "issue": "Consistent semantic versioning\n## Summary\r\n\r\nThe most recent version of Pyomo released was 6.2, as opposed to 6.2.0. It seems inconsistent with the way many other packages are versioned (e.g. NumFocus packages), although I am unaware if there is a standard specified anywhere. Is there a benefit to the former as opposed to the latter? \r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nManaging our dependencies, we automate pulling in new versions of packages, running them through our CI prior to upgrading. We run this in two ways - one allowing all upgrades and one allowing only compatible upgrades (PEP 440). This always requires manual review because not all packages use semantic versioning (or the same semantic versioning). One manual override we had to apply this time was pinning `Pyomo ~= 6.2.0` instead of what our script automatically pulled in `Pyomo ~= 6.2`.\nConsistent semantic versioning\n## Summary\r\n\r\nThe most recent version of Pyomo released was 6.2, as opposed to 6.2.0. It seems inconsistent with the way many other packages are versioned (e.g. NumFocus packages), although I am unaware if there is a standard specified anywhere. Is there a benefit to the former as opposed to the latter? \r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nManaging our dependencies, we automate pulling in new versions of packages, running them through our CI prior to upgrading. We run this in two ways - one allowing all upgrades and one allowing only compatible upgrades (PEP 440). This always requires manual review because not all packages use semantic versioning (or the same semantic versioning). One manual override we had to apply this time was pinning `Pyomo ~= 6.2.0` instead of what our script automatically pulled in `Pyomo ~= 6.2`.\n", "before_files": [{"content": "#  ___________________________________________________________________________\n#\n#  Pyomo: Python Optimization Modeling Objects\n#  Copyright 2017 National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC\n#  Under the terms of Contract DE-NA0003525 with National Technology and \n#  Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, the U.S. Government retains certain \n#  rights in this software.\n#  This software is distributed under the 3-clause BSD License.\n#  ___________________________________________________________________________\n\n_init_url=\"$URL$\"\n\n# NOTE: releaselevel should be left at 'invalid' for trunk development\n#     and set to 'final' for releases.  During development, the\n#     major.minor.micro should point ot the NEXT release (generally, the\n#     next micro release after the current release).\n#\n# Note: When cutting a release, also update the major/minor/micro in\n#\n#     pyomo/RELEASE.txt\n#\n# The VOTD zipbuilder will automatically change releaselevel to \"VOTD\n# {hash}\" and set the serial number to YYMMDDhhmm.  The serial number\n# should generally be left at 0, unless a downstream package is tracking\n# main and needs a hard reference to \"suitably new\" development.\nmajor=6\nminor=2\nmicro=1\nreleaselevel='invalid'\n#releaselevel='final'\nserial=0\n\nif releaselevel == 'final':\n    pass\nelif '/tags/' in _init_url:                #pragma:nocover\n    releaselevel = 'final'\nelif releaselevel == 'invalid':\n    from os.path import abspath, dirname, exists, join\n    if __file__.endswith('setup.py'):\n        # This file is being sources (exec'ed) from setup.py.\n        # dirname(__file__) setup.py's scope is the root sourec directory\n        _rootdir = os.path.dirname(__file__)\n    else:\n        # Eventually this should import PYOMO_ROOT_DIR from\n        # pyomo.common instead of reimplementing that logic here.\n        #\n        # __file__ fails if script is called in different ways on Windows\n        # __file__ fails if someone does os.chdir() before\n        # sys.argv[0] also fails because it doesn't not always contains the path\n        from inspect import getfile, currentframe\n        _rootdir = join(dirname(abspath(getfile(currentframe()))), '..', '..')\n\n    if exists(join(_rootdir, '.git')):\n        try:\n            with open(join(_rootdir, '.git', 'HEAD')) as _FILE:\n                _ref = _FILE.readline().strip()           #pragma:nocover\n            releaselevel = 'devel {%s}' % (\n                _ref.split('/')[-1].split('\\\\')[-1], )    #pragma:nocover\n        except:\n            releaselevel = 'devel'         #pragma:nocover\n    elif exists(join(_rootdir, '.svn')):\n        releaselevel = 'devel {svn}'       #pragma:nocover\n    else:\n        releaselevel = 'VOTD'              #pragma:nocover\n\n\nversion_info = (major, minor, micro, releaselevel, serial)\n\nversion = '.'.join(str(x) for x in version_info[:(3 if micro else 2)])\n__version__ = version\nif releaselevel != 'final':\n    version += ' ('+releaselevel+')'\nif releaselevel.startswith('devel'):\n    __version__ += \".dev%d\" % (serial,)\nelif releaselevel.startswith('VOTD'):\n    __version__ += \"a%d\" % (serial,)\n", "path": "pyomo/version/info.py"}]}