text
stringlengths 649
4.42k
| synonym_substitution
stringlengths 759
4.5k
| butter_fingers
stringlengths 649
4.42k
| random_deletion
stringlengths 453
2.31k
| change_char_case
stringlengths 649
4.42k
| whitespace_perturbation
stringlengths 764
5.02k
| underscore_trick
stringlengths 649
4.42k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
m V/X,Y),\circ) \to (KK(X,Y),\circ)$$ to the “$KK$-theory via correspondences" of Emerson-Meyer [@EM2; @EM3] (and more generally to their counterpart based on a complex oriented cohomology theory).
Let $\bB$ be a bivariant theory on $\m V$ such that a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$ has a [*stable orientation*]{} $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$, like $\bM(\m V/-)$, with $\theta(f):=[X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X} X]$ (these notions will be explained in §2). In the algebraic context, examples for $\bB$ are given by the bivariant algebraic $K$-theory $\bK_{alg}$ of relative perfect complexes and the bivariant operational Chow groups $CH$. Examples in the complex algebraic or analytic context are given by the (even degree) bivariant topological $K$-theory $\bK^{top}$ or homology theory $\bH\otimes R$ of Fulton–MacPherson [@Fulton-MacPherson], with $R=\bZ, \bQ, \bQ[y]$. Another example is Fulton-MacPherson’s bivariant theory $\bF$ of constructible functions in the complex algebraic or analytic context, or Ernström-Yokura’s bivariant theory $\tilde{\bF}$ of constructible functions in the algebraic context over a base field of characteristic zero, with $\theta(f)=\jeden_f:=1_X$ for a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$.
\[thm:univ\] Let $\bB$ be a bivariant theory on $\m V$ such that a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$ has a stable orientation $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$. Then there exists a unique Grothendieck transformation $$\ga:=\ga_{\theta}: \bM(\m V/-) \to \bB(-)$$ satisfying the normalization condition that for a smooth morphism $f:X \to Y$ the following identity holds in $\bB(X \xrightarrow {f} Y)$: $$\ga([X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X} X]) = \theta(f).$$
Let $c\ell | m V / X, Y),\circ) \to (KK(X, Y),\circ)$$ to the “ $ KK$-theory via correspondences " of Emerson - Meyer [ @EM2; @EM3 ] (and more generally to their counterpart based on a complex oriented cohomology hypothesis).
lease $ \bB$ be a bivariant theory on $ \m V$ such that a smooth morphism $ f: X\to Y$ experience a [ * static orientation * ] { } $ \theta(f)\in \bB(f)$, like $ \bM(\m V/-)$, with $ \theta(f):=[X \xrightarrow { \op { id}_X } X]$ (these notions will be explained in § 2). In the algebraic context, case for $ \bB$ are given by the bivariant algebraic $ K$-theory $ \bK_{alg}$ of relative arrant complex and the bivariant operational Chow group $ CH$. Examples in the complex algebraic or analytic context are given by the (tied degree) bivariant topological $ K$-theory $ \bK^{top}$ or homology theory $ \bH\otimes R$ of Fulton – MacPherson [ @Fulton - MacPherson ], with $ R=\bZ, \bQ, \bQ[y]$. Another case is Fulton - MacPherson ’s bivariant theory $ \bF$ of constructible functions in the complex algebraic or analytic context, or Ernström - Yokura ’s bivariant hypothesis $ \tilde{\bF}$ of constructible functions in the algebraic context over a base field of characteristic zero, with $ \theta(f)=\jeden_f:=1_X$ for a fluent morphism $ f: X\to Y$.
\[thm: univ\ ] Let $ \bB$ be a bivariant theory on $ \m V$ such that a politic morphism $ f: X\to Y$ has a static orientation $ \theta(f)\in \bB(f)$. Then there exist a unique Grothendieck transformation $ $ \ga:=\ga_{\theta }: \bM(\m V/-) \to \bB(-)$$ satisfying the normalization circumstance that for a smooth morphism $ f :X \to Y$ the following identity holds in $ \bB(X \xrightarrow { f } Y)$: $ $ \ga([X \xrightarrow { \op { id}_X } X ]) = \theta(f).$$
Let $ c\ell | m V/D,Y),\circ) \to (KK(X,Y),\circ)$$ to tht “$KK$-theory via cotrwspondxnces" or Emersov-Meyer [@EM2; @EM3] (and more generaplt to ukeir counterpart basdd on a clmplex oeienued cohomology thxkry).
Let $\nY$ be z bivcrmant theory on $\k V$ such tvat a smooth mmrohnsm $f: X\to Y$ has a [*stable orientation*]{} $\theta(f)\on \bB(f)$, like $\bM(\m D/-)$, wiuh $\ehetz(f):=[X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X} X]$ (these notjons winl be explainrd in §2). In the algebraic cojtexh, examples for $\bB$ wre given bi thq bivariant augebraic $K$-uhzory $\bK_{alg}$ kf relative perfect complexes avd thz bivariant operwjional Chow jroups $CH$. Examples in the womplex algebraic or snanytuc context are given uy the (even degree) byvariant do'ological $K$-theory $\bK^{tip}$ or hmmolmgy gyeofy $\gH\ptjmes R$ of Fulton–MacLherson [@Fulron-MacPherson], with $T=\bS, \bQ, \bQ[y]$. Anothsr exaipje is Fulton-MacPherson’s bivariant theorj $\bF$ of constructible functuons in the complex apgebraic jr analytic context, or Ernström-Yokura’s bivariant tveory $\gilbc{\nF}$ ow clnstructible functions in the algebraic contevf pvvr a base field on characteristic zrrl, eyth $\theta(f)=\jedgn_f:=1_X$ fox a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$.
\[trm:unic\] Let $\bB$ fe a bivariant theory on $\m V$ suxh that a smjith morphism $f: X\to Y$ has a stcble otientayion $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$. Then chere sxists a unlque Grotgdndieck transforoatpon $$\ca:=\ga_{\theta}: \bM(\m V/-) \to \bB(-)$$ satiffying thx norkalizatkon vondityon that flr a smooth morphism $f:X \ho Y$ jhe fonlowing idfntity holds in $\bB(X \xrightarrow {f} Y)$: $$\ga([X \xrighjarsow {\op {id}_X} R]) = \thcta(f).$$
Let $c\ell | m V/X,Y),\circ) \to (KK(X,Y),\circ)$$ to the “$KK$-theory of [@EM2; @EM3] more generally to complex cohomology theory). Let be a bivariant on $\m V$ such that a morphism $f: X\to Y$ has a [*stable orientation*]{} $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$, like $\bM(\m V/-)$, $\theta(f):=[X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X} X]$ (these notions will be explained in §2). In algebraic examples $\bB$ given by the bivariant algebraic $K$-theory $\bK_{alg}$ of relative perfect complexes and the bivariant operational Chow $CH$. Examples in the complex algebraic or analytic are given by the degree) bivariant topological $K$-theory $\bK^{top}$ homology $\bH\otimes R$ Fulton–MacPherson with \bQ, \bQ[y]$. Another is Fulton-MacPherson’s bivariant theory $\bF$ of constructible functions in the complex algebraic or analytic context, or Ernström-Yokura’s theory $\tilde{\bF}$ functions in algebraic over base field of with $\theta(f)=\jeden_f:=1_X$ for a smooth morphism \[thm:univ\] Let $\bB$ be a bivariant theory on V$ such a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$ a stable orientation $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$. Then there exists unique Grothendieck transformation $$\ga:=\ga_{\theta}: \bM(\m V/-) \to \bB(-)$$ satisfying the normalization condition that for a $f:X \to Y$ the identity holds in \xrightarrow Y)$: \xrightarrow {id}_X} X]) \theta(f).$$ Let $c\ell | m V/X,Y),\circ) \to (KK(X,Y),\circ)$$ to the “$KK$-Theory via cOrresPonDenCeS" of EMersOn-Meyer [@EM2; @EM3] (and MOre gEnerally to their counterPart bAsED on a COmPlex oRiented COhOMOloGy ThEorY).
LET $\bb$ be a bIvaRiant thEory on $\m V$ suCh tHaT a smooth morpHIsM $f: X\to Y$ has a [*StaBle orientatiOn*]{} $\tHeta(f)\iN \bb(f)$, lIKe $\bM(\m v/-)$, wiTh $\theTa(f):=[X \xrIGhtarrOw {\op {id}_X} X]$ (tHeSE notioNS will be EXPlAineD in §2). In the algebraic COnTExt, examples for $\BB$ are gIvEN bY THe bIvaRiant algebRaIc $K$-thEOry $\bK_{alG}$ Of RELAtiVE perfect complExes and the bIVarIant opErAtiONal ChoW grouPs $ch$. ExAmples in the CompLex algebrAic or aNAlytic cONtext arE given By tHe (eVen dEGrEe) BivArIAnt TOpOloGIcaL $K$-theory $\BK^{ToP}$ or hoMoloGY THEory $\BH\oTimeS R$ of FUlton–MacPhersOn [@FUltoN-macphersOn], witH $R=\bZ, \BQ, \BQ[y]$. AnOther eXamplE iS Fulton-MacPhersOn’s bIvariant tHeoRy $\BF$ oF cOnstrUCtible FunCtiOns in thE compleX AlgEbRAIC oR analytic context, or erNSTrÖm-Yokura’S bivarIAnT tHEory $\tildE{\bf}$ of ConsTRUctibLe fuNCtIons in thE algebRAiC cOntext oVeR a base FiEld Of cHaracTErisTic zerO, with $\theTa(f)=\jeDEn_f:=1_X$ for a smooth MOrphism $f: X\to Y$.
\[tHM:uNIV\] LET $\bB$ bE a bIvariant theOry oN $\M V$ suCh thAT a SmoOTh morPhism $F: X\TO Y$ HAs a stable orientatioN $\tHeta(f)\iN \bB(f)$. THen there existS a unique GrOTHEndieck tRansFOrMAtion $$\ga:=\ga_{\theta}: \BM(\m V/-) \tO \bB(-)$$ satisfyINg the norMalizAtion conDition thaT FOr a smootH moRphIsm $F:X \tO y$ ThE following ideNTIty hOlDs in $\bB(X \XriGhtarroW {f} Y)$: $$\Ga([X \XriGhtArRow {\op {id}_X} X]) = \Theta(f).$$
LeT $c\ElL | m V/X,Y),\circ) \to (KK(X, Y),\circ)$ $ tothe “$ KK $-th eory via correspon d ence s" of Emerson-Meyer [@ EM2;@E M 3] ( a nd more genera l ly t o t he ir co un t er partbas ed on a complex o rie nt ed cohomolog y t heory).
L et$\bB$ be a b iva riantth eor y on $ \mV$ su ch tha t a smo oth morph is m $f: X \ to Y$ h a s a [*s table orientation * ]{ } $\theta(f)\in \bB(f )$ , l i k e $ \bM (\m V/-)$, w ith $ \ theta(f ) := [ X \xr i ghtarrow {\op {id}_X} X] $ (t hese n ot ion s willbe ex pl a ine d in §2). I n th e algebra ic con t ext, ex a mples f or $\b B$are giv e nby th eb iva r ia nta lge braic $K $- th eory$\bK _ { a l g}$ofrela tiveperfect compl exe s an d th e biv arian t op er ation al Cho w gro up s $CH$. Example s in the comp lex a lge br aic o r analy tic co ntext a re give n by t h e (e ven degree) bivari an t to pologica l $K$- t he or y $\bK^{t op }$or h o m ology the o ry $\bH\ot imes R $ o fFulton– Ma cPhers on [@ Ful ton-M a cPhe rson], with $R =\bZ, \bQ, \bQ[y]$.A nother exampl e i s Fu l ton- Mac Pherson’s b ivar i anttheo r y$\b F $ ofconst ru c ti b le functions in the c omplex alge braic or anal ytic conte x t , or Erns tröm - Yo k ura’s bivarian t the ory $\tild e {\bF}$ o f con structib le functi o n s in the al geb rai c c o n te xt over a bas e fiel dof char act eristic ze ro, wi th$\ theta(f)= \jeden_f := 1_ X$ f ora smo o th morph is m $ f: X\ to Y$ .
\[th m:uni v\]Le t$ \bB $ be ab iv a r iant t he oryon$\ m V$such tha t a smo oth morph ism $f:X\ to Y$ has a stable ori en tation $\t he ta( f)\in\ b B(f)$. T hen there exists a uniq u e Groth end iecktran sformatio n $ $\ga:= \ga _ {\thet a}: \b M(\mV/ -)\ t o \bB ( - )$ $ s at isfying th e nor maliz at ionconditi on that for a smoo t h m orphism $f:X\to Y$t h efol l ow i ngid e nti t y holds in $\bB( X \xrighta rr o w{f} Y)$: $ $ \ga ([ X \xrig htarrow {\op {id}_X} X]) = \ theta(f). $$
Le t $c\ ell | m V/X,Y),\circ)_\to (KK(X,Y),\circ)$$_to the “$KK$-theory via_correspondences" of_Emerson-Meyer_[@EM2; @EM3]_(and_more generally to_their counterpart based_on a complex oriented_cohomology theory).
Let $\bB$_be_a bivariant theory on $\m V$ such that a smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$_has_a [*stable_orientation*]{}_$\theta(f)\in_\bB(f)$, like $\bM(\m V/-)$, with_$\theta(f):=[X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X} X]$_(these notions_will be explained in §2). In the algebraic_context,_examples for $\bB$_are given by the bivariant algebraic $K$-theory $\bK_{alg}$ of_relative perfect complexes and the bivariant_operational Chow groups_$CH$._Examples_in the complex algebraic_or analytic context are given by_the (even degree) bivariant topological $K$-theory_$\bK^{top}$ or homology theory $\bH\otimes R$ of_Fulton–MacPherson [@Fulton-MacPherson], with $R=\bZ, \bQ, \bQ[y]$._Another example is Fulton-MacPherson’s bivariant_theory $\bF$_of constructible functions in the_complex algebraic or_analytic context,_or Ernström-Yokura’s bivariant_theory $\tilde{\bF}$ of constructible functions in_the algebraic context_over a base field of characteristic_zero,_with $\theta(f)=\jeden_f:=1_X$ for_a_smooth_morphism $f:_X\to Y$.
\[thm:univ\] Let_$\bB$_be a_bivariant_theory on $\m V$ such that_a_smooth morphism $f: X\to Y$ has a_stable orientation $\theta(f)\in \bB(f)$._Then_there exists a unique_Grothendieck transformation $$\ga:=\ga_{\theta}: \bM(\m V/-)_\to \bB(-)$$ satisfying the normalization condition_that for_a smooth_morphism $f:X \to Y$ the following identity holds in $\bB(X \xrightarrow_{f} Y)$: $$\ga([X \xrightarrow {\op {id}_X}_X]) = \theta(f).$$
Let_$c\ell |
I^{\otimes n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\
f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langle0^n|V^\dagger(|0\rangle\langle0|^{\otimes 2}
\otimes I^{\otimes n-2})V|0^n\rangle.\end{aligned}$$ Now we show that calculating $f(0^{n+1},U_1)$ and $f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ with a constant multiplicative error $0\le \epsilon<1$ is postBQP-hard. Since ${\rm postBQP}={\rm PP}$ [@postBQP] and ${\rm P}^{\rm PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it means that the calculation is $\#$P-hard. Proof is as follows. Let us assume that there exists an algorithm that calculates $a$ and $b$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
|f(0^{n+1},U_1)-a|&\le& \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_1),\\
|f(0^{n+1},U_2)-b|&\le& \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_2).\end{aligned}$$ Let $L$ be a language in postBQP. Then, for any polynomial $r$, there exists a uniform family $\{V_x\}_x$ of polynomial-time quantum circuits such that
- If $x\in L$ then $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\ge1-2^{-r}$.
- If $x\notin L$ then $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\le2^{-r}$.
Here, $$\begin{aligned}
P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)=\frac{P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)}{P_{V_x}(p=0)},\end{aligned}$$ $P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)$ is the probability that $V_x$ outputs $(o,p)=(0,0)$, and $P_{V_x}(p=0)$ is the probability that $V_x$ outputs $p=0$.
Let us construct $U_1$ and $U_2$ by using $V_ | I^{\otimes n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\
f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langle0^n|V^\dagger(|0\rangle\langle0|^{\otimes 2 }
\otimes I^{\otimes n-2})V|0^n\rangle.\end{aligned}$$ Now we show that calculating $ f(0^{n+1},U_1)$ and $ f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ with a constant multiplicative mistake $ 0\le \epsilon<1 $ is postBQP - unvoiced. Since $ { \rm postBQP}={\rm PP}$ [ @postBQP ] and $ { \rm P}^{\rm PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it means that the calculation is $ \#$P - hard. Proof is as postdate. Let us assume that there exist an algorithm that forecast $ a$ and $ b$ such that $ $ \begin{aligned }
|f(0^{n+1},U_1)-a|&\le & \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_1),\\
|f(0^{n+1},U_2)-b|&\le & \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_2).\end{aligned}$$ Let $ L$ be a speech in postBQP. Then, for any polynomial $ r$, there exists a uniform syndicate $ \{V_x\}_x$ of polynomial - time quantum circuits such that
- If $ x\in L$ then $ P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\ge1 - 2^{-r}$.
- If $ x\notin L$ then $ P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\le2^{-r}$.
Here, $ $ \begin{aligned }
P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)=\frac{P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)}{P_{V_x}(p=0)},\end{aligned}$$ $ P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)$ is the probability that $ V_x$ output $ (o, p)=(0,0)$, and $ P_{V_x}(p=0)$ is the probability that $ V_x$ output signal $ p=0$.
Let us construct $ U_1 $ and $ U_2 $ by use $ V _ | I^{\ohimes n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\
f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langue0^n|V^\dagger(|0\ranglg\lqngle0|^{\ovimes 2}
\ofimes I^{\ogimes n-2})V|0^n\rangle.\end{aligned}$$ Nox we show that calculating $f(0^{n+1},U_1)$ xnd $f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ wpth a conwtanu multiplicative xdror $0\le \epsilkk<1$ is 'owtBQP-hard. Sincg ${\rm postBQP}={\sm PP}$ [@postBQP] atd ${\rl P}^{\rm PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it means that the salculayiln is $\#$P-hard. Prjof ps as rollows. Let us assume that there esists ai algorithm thay calculates $a$ and $b$ such hhat $$\begin{aligned}
|f(0^{n+1},U_1)-a|&\lf& \epsilon f(0^{b+1},U_1),\\
|f(0^{n+1},T_2)-v|&\le& \epsilon w(0^{n+1},U_2).\end{aligned}$$ Let $L$ be a language in postBQP. Then, for any 'olynomial $t$, fhfte exists a nnifori family $\{V_x\}_x$ of polytomial-tome quantum civcuitv sych that
- If $x\in L$ tien $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\ge1-2^{-r}$.
- If $x\njtin L$ than $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\le2^{-r}$.
Here, $$\begun{qligngd}
P_{V_x}(m=0|p=0)=\frxx{P_{V_b}(o=0,p=0)}{K_{V_x}('=0)},\ens{alignfd}$$ $'_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)$ is ths probabiliry that $V_x$ outputs $(p,p)=(0,0)$, qnd $P_{V_x}(p=0)$ is tge profafility that $V_x$ outputs $p=0$.
Let us construcu $U_1$ ahd $U_2$ by using $V_ | I^{\otimes n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\ f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langle0^n|V^\dagger(|0\rangle\langle0|^{\otimes 2} \otimes I^{\otimes n-2})V|0^n\rangle.\end{aligned}$$ show calculating $f(0^{n+1},U_1)$ $f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ with a is Since ${\rm postBQP}={\rm [@postBQP] and ${\rm PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it means that calculation is $\#$P-hard. Proof is as follows. Let us assume that there exists algorithm that calculates $a$ and $b$ such that $$\begin{aligned} |f(0^{n+1},U_1)-a|&\le& \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_1),\\ |f(0^{n+1},U_2)-b|&\le& f(0^{n+1},U_2).\end{aligned}$$ $L$ a in postBQP. Then, for any polynomial $r$, there exists a uniform family $\{V_x\}_x$ of polynomial-time quantum such that - If $x\in L$ then $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\ge1-2^{-r}$. If $x\notin L$ then Here, $$\begin{aligned} P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)=\frac{P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)}{P_{V_x}(p=0)},\end{aligned}$$ $P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)$ is probability $V_x$ outputs and is probability that $V_x$ $p=0$. Let us construct $U_1$ and $U_2$ by using $V_ | I^{\otimes n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\
f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langle0^N|V^\dagger(|0\raNgle\lAngLe0|^{\oTiMes 2}
\oTimeS I^{\otimes n-2})V|0^n\ranGLe.\enD{aligned}$$ Now we show that cAlculAtINg $f(0^{n+1},u_1)$ AnD $f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ wIth a conSTaNT MulTiPlIcaTiVE eRror $0\lE \epSilon<1$ is PostBQP-harD. SiNcE ${\rm postBQP}={\rm pp}$ [@pOstBQP] and ${\rM P}^{\rM PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it mEanS that tHe CalCUlatiOn iS $\#$P-harD. Proof IS as folLows. Let us AsSUme thaT There exISTs An alGorithm that calculATeS $A$ and $b$ such that $$\bEgin{alIgNEd}
|F(0^{N+1},u_1)-a|&\lE& \epSilon f(0^{n+1},U_1),\\
|f(0^{n+1},u_2)-b|&\Le& \epsILon f(0^{n+1},U_2).\eND{aLIGNed}$$ lEt $L$ be a languagE in postBQP. THEn, fOr any pOlYnoMIal $r$, thEre exIsTS a uNiform familY $\{V_x\}_x$ Of polynomIal-timE Quantum CIrcuits Such thAt
- IF $x\iN L$ thEN $P_{v_x}(O=0|p=0)\gE1-2^{-r}$.
- iF $x\nOTiN L$ tHEn $P_{v_x}(o=0|p=0)\le2^{-r}$.
HErE, $$\bEgin{aLignED}
p_{v_X}(o=0|p=0)=\fRac{p_{V_x}(o=0,P=0)}{P_{V_x}(p=0)},\End{aligned}$$ $P_{V_x}(O=0,p=0)$ iS the PRobAbiliTy thaT $V_x$ oUtPuts $(o,P)=(0,0)$, and $P_{V_X}(p=0)$ is tHe Probability that $v_x$ ouTputs $p=0$.
Let Us cOnStrUcT $U_1$ and $u_2$ By usinG $V_ | I^{\otimes n-1})V|0^n\ran gle,\\
f (0^{n +1} ,U_ 2) &=&\ lang le0^n|V^\dagge r (|0\ rangle\langle0|^{\otim es 2}
\ o time s I ^{\ot imes n- 2 }) V | 0^n \r an gle .\ e nd {alig ned }$$ Now we show t hat c alculating $ f (0 ^{n+1},U_1 )$and $f(0^{n+ 1}, U_2)$wi tha cons tan t mul tiplic a tive e rror $0\l e\ epsilo n <1$ isp o st BQP- hard. Since ${\rm po s tBQP}={\rm PP} $ [@po st B QP ] and ${ \rm P}^{\r mPP}={ \ rm P}^{ \ #{ \ r m P} } $, it means t hat the cal c ula tion i s$\# $ P-hard . Pro of isas follows. Let us assum e that there e x ists an algor ith m t hatc al cu lat es $a$ an d $ b $ s uch that $ $\ begin {ali g n e d }
|f (0^ {n+1 },U_1 )-a|&\le& \ep sil on f ( 0^{ n+1}, U_1), \\
| f( 0^{n+ 1},U_2 )-b|& \l e& \epsilon f(0 ^{n+ 1},U_2).\ end {a lig ne d}$$L et $L$ be alanguag e in po s tBQ P. T h en , for any polynomi al $ r$ , thereexists aun i form fam il y $ \{V_ x \ }_x$of p o ly nomial-t ime qu a nt um circui ts suchth at
- If$ x\in L$ th en $P_{V _x}(o = 0|p=0)\ge1-2^{ - r}$.
- If$ x\ n o ti n L$the n $P_{V_x}( o=0| p =0)\ le2^ { -r }$.
Here , $$\ be g in { aligned}
P_{V_x}(o= 0| p=0)=\ frac{ P_{V_x}(o=0,p =0)}{P_{V_ x } ( p=0)},\e nd{a l ig n ed}$$ $P_{V_x} (o=0, p=0)$ is t h e probab ility that $V _x$ outpu t s $(o,p)= (0, 0)$ , a nd$ P _{ V_x}(p=0)$ is t he p ro babilit y t hat $V_ x$out put s $ p= 0$.
Letus const ru ct $ U_ 1$and $ U _2$ by u si ng$V _ | I^{\otimes_n-1})V|0^n\rangle,\\ _
f(0^{n+1},U_2)&=&\langle0^n|V^\dagger(|0\rangle\langle0|^{\otimes 2}
\otimes I^{\otimes n-2})V|0^n\rangle.\end{aligned}$$_Now we_show_that calculating_$f(0^{n+1},U_1)$_and $f(0^{n+1},U_2)$ with_a constant multiplicative_error $0\le \epsilon<1$ is_postBQP-hard. Since ${\rm_postBQP}={\rm_PP}$ [@postBQP] and ${\rm P}^{\rm PP}={\rm P}^{\#{\rm P}}$, it means that the calculation is $\#$P-hard._Proof_is as_follows._Let_us assume that there exists_an algorithm that calculates $a$_and $b$_such that $$\begin{aligned}
|f(0^{n+1},U_1)-a|&\le& \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_1),\\
|f(0^{n+1},U_2)-b|&\le& \epsilon f(0^{n+1},U_2).\end{aligned}$$ Let_$L$_be a language_in postBQP. Then, for any polynomial $r$, there exists_a uniform family $\{V_x\}_x$ of polynomial-time_quantum circuits such_that
-__ If $x\in L$_then $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\ge1-2^{-r}$.
- If $x\notin_L$ then $P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)\le2^{-r}$.
Here, $$\begin{aligned}
P_{V_x}(o=0|p=0)=\frac{P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)}{P_{V_x}(p=0)},\end{aligned}$$ $P_{V_x}(o=0,p=0)$ is_the probability that $V_x$ outputs $(o,p)=(0,0)$, and_$P_{V_x}(p=0)$ is the probability that $V_x$_outputs $p=0$.
Let us construct $U_1$_and $U_2$_by using $V_ |
replica theory of spin glasses [@parisi:83].
Measurement of the overlap function {#sect:q_measurement}
===================================
\[sec:meas\]
In this section we outline the key process of this work, i.e., the basic experimental procedure by which physical replicas can be prepared and used to measure the overlap function $q$ defined in (\[eq:q\]). This consists of three essential steps: (1) initial preparation of disorder replicas, (2) introduction of probe atoms and (3) the measurement process, involving recombination of the replicas and spectroscopy to measure the overlap itself. At no stage do we assume individual addressability of lattice sites, but rather consider global operations and the measurement of global quantities.
Initial preparation of disorder replicas
----------------------------------------
We consider a situation in which atoms are confined to a three-dimensional optical lattice, which is particularly deep along the $z$-direction, so that an array of planes with 2D lattice potentials are formed in the $x$–$y$ plane, with no tunneling between the planes. Each of these 2D planes of the potential can be divided into two subplanes, again along the $z$-direction, by adding a superlattice of half the original period which can be controllably switched on and off [@sebby-strabley:06; @foelling:07]. The resulting two subplanes then constitute our replicas, and our goal is that these pieces should have the same disorder realisation.
In the case of disorder generated optically (using, e.g., speckle patterns) the different layers exhibit the same disorder landscape for a suitable orientation of the lasers. However, for a disorder induced by a second species, the replicas must be produced in several steps. We start with a two-species mixture in the undivided plane. A fast ramping up of the optical lattice depth within the plane for the disorder species results in a Poissonian distribution of particles in the lattice. The next step is then a filtering procedure removing singly-occupied sites and keeping only doubly-occupied and unoccupied sites (which are distributed randomly). Such a filtering procedure has been achieved in recent experiments where atoms are combined to Feshbach molecules, and atoms remaining unpaired are removed from the system using a combination of microwave and optical fields that is energy-selective based on the molecular binding energy [@winkler:06]. Finally, the superlattice is applied adiabatically providing a double | replica theory of spin glasses [ @parisi:83 ].
Measurement of the overlap affair { # faction: q_measurement }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
\[sec: meas\ ]
In this section we outline the cardinal process of this oeuvre, i.e., the basic experimental procedure by which physical replica can be organize and used to quantify the lap function $ q$ defined in (\[eq: q\ ]). This consist of three essential steps: (1) initial preparation of disorderliness replicas, (2) introduction of probe atoms and (3) the measurement procedure, involving recombination of the replicas and spectroscopy to quantify the overlap itself. At no stage do we assume individual addressability of wicket sites, but rather consider global operations and the measurement of ball-shaped quantities.
Initial training of disorder replicas
----------------------------------------
We consider a situation in which atom are confined to a three - dimensional optical lattice, which is particularly deep along the $ z$-direction, so that an array of planes with 2D lattice potentials are formed in the $ x$–$y$ plane, with no tunneling between the planes. Each of these 2D planes of the potential can be divided into two subplanes, again along the $ z$-direction, by adding a superlattice of half the original period which can be controllably switched on and off [ @sebby - strabley:06; @foelling:07 ]. The result two subplanes then constitute our replicas, and our goal is that these piece should get the same disorder realisation.
In the shell of disorder generated optically (using, e.g., speckle traffic pattern) the different layers exhibit the same disorder landscape for a suitable orientation course of the lasers. However, for a disorder induced by a second species, the replica must be produced in respective steps. We start with a two - species mixture in the undivided plane. A fast ramping up of the ocular lattice depth within the plane for the disorderliness species solution in a Poissonian distribution of particles in the lattice. The adjacent step is then a filtering procedure remove singly - busy sites and observe only doubly - fill and unoccupied sites (which are distributed randomly). Such a filtering procedure has been achieved in recent experiment where atoms are compound to Feshbach molecules, and atoms remaining unpaired are removed from the arrangement using a combination of microwave and optical field that is energy - selective based on the molecular binding energy [ @winkler:06 ]. Finally, the superlattice is applied adiabatically provide a double | reolica theory of spin glarses [@parisi:83].
Measorwment mf the overlap function {#sect:q_measurement}
===================================
\[ser:meaw\]
In tyis section we outline the key irocess od thms work, i.e., the beaic expcximenfwl pxoredure by which physical seplicas can ba orzpared and used to measure the overlwp funcyiln $q$ defined ig (\[eq:q\]). Ehis boksists of three essential steps: (1) initian preparation of disorder replicas, (2) intgoduftion of probe atols and (3) the meafyrement procdss, involvpug recombinztion of the replicas and spectfosco'y to measutz thf overlap itwelf. Wt no stage do we asvume incividual addrexsauiliry of lattice sites, bnt rather consider gjobal opesacions and the measurenebt of glotal dyangitjex.
Ihitial prxparation or disorder eeplicas
----------------------------------------
We consider a wituation in shich wtjms are confined to a three-dimensional mptjcal lattice, which is pqrticularly deep alonh the $z$-diwection, so that an array of planes with 2D lattice poteitkalw wfw vormed in the $x$–$y$ plane, with no tunneling betwqsn tme planes. Each on these 2D planes og hhr potential cav be dnbised into two subplwnes, agwin aoong the $e$-direvtion, by adding a superlattuce of half nhe iriginal period whnch can be cuntrpllabky switched on and off [@rebbg-strabley:06; @flelling:07]. Tgd resulting two rubilanas then constitute our repjicas, and our goal ir thst thefe pieces dhould have the same dislrder raalisation.
Ln the case of disorder generatxv optically (uxitg, v.g., specklz pattcrns) the differqnt layers exhnbit the same disorder mandsca'e for a suieable orientadlon of the lesers. Howqver, for a disofaer induced by a second species, tye replicas must bc proahced in several sttpw. We start witn a twj-siecmes myfture in the undkviard plxne. A fast vamoing up of the optical ldttide depth within thr ilane for the disjrder species results in a Poisdoniai distcibutipn jf particles in the lattice. Ths next stfp ls then a fileerikg ptocedure rekoving singly-occupied sites and keeping only doubly-occupiwd and unoccupied sntts (which are vistrifuted rangomly). Such a filteribg procedure has neen achieved in recenf expesimenhs where atoms are combined to Feshbach molecules, and atoms remaining unpqired erq removed fdom yhe sjstzm bsing a comuiiation of microwane and optical fields that is enxrgy-selecthvz based on the molecular bindone energy [@winkuer:06]. Finally, the superlatfice is spplied adiabatically providing a double | replica theory of spin glasses [@parisi:83]. Measurement overlap {#sect:q_measurement} =================================== In this section of work, i.e., the experimental procedure by physical replicas can be prepared and to measure the overlap function $q$ defined in (\[eq:q\]). This consists of three steps: (1) initial preparation of disorder replicas, (2) introduction of probe atoms and the process, recombination the replicas and spectroscopy to measure the overlap itself. At no stage do we assume individual of lattice sites, but rather consider global operations the measurement of global Initial preparation of disorder replicas We a situation which are to a three-dimensional lattice, which is particularly deep along the $z$-direction, so that an array of planes with 2D lattice are formed $x$–$y$ plane, no between planes. Each of planes of the potential can be subplanes, again along the $z$-direction, by adding a of half original period which can be controllably on and off [@sebby-strabley:06; @foelling:07]. The resulting two then constitute our replicas, and our goal is that these pieces should have the same In the case of generated optically (using, speckle the layers the same landscape for a suitable orientation of the lasers. However, for a induced by a second species, the replicas must be produced steps. start with a mixture in the undivided A ramping up of the depth the disorder results a Poissonian distribution of in the lattice. The next is then a filtering keeping only doubly-occupied and unoccupied sites (which are randomly). Such a filtering procedure has been in recent experiments where atoms are combined to Feshbach molecules, and atoms unpaired are the system using a combination of microwave and fields that is energy-selective on the molecular binding energy [@winkler:06]. Finally, the superlattice applied providing a | replica theory of spin glasseS [@parisi:83].
MeaSuremEnt Of tHe OverLap fUnction {#sect:q_meASureMent}
===================================
\[sec:meas\]
In this sectiOn we oUtLIne tHE kEy proCess of tHIs WORk, i.E., tHe BasIc EXpErimeNtaL procedUre by which PhySiCal replicas cAN bE prepared aNd uSed to measure The OverlaP fUncTIon $q$ dEfiNed in (\[Eq:q\]). ThiS ConsisTs of three EsSEntial STeps: (1) iniTIAl PrepAration of disorder REpLIcas, (2) introductiOn of prObE AtOMS anD (3) thE measuremeNt ProceSS, involvINg RECOmbINation of the rePlicas and spECtrOscopy To MeaSUre the OverlAp ITseLf. At no stage Do we Assume indIviduaL AddressABility oF lattiCe sIteS, but RAtHeR coNsIDer GLoBal OPerAtions anD tHe MeasuRemeNT OF GlobAl qUantIties.
initial preparAtiOn of DIsoRder rEplicAs
----------------------------------------
We CoNsideR a situAtion In Which atoms are coNfinEd to a threE-diMeNsiOnAl optICal latTicE, whIch is paRticulaRLy dEeP ALOnG the $z$-direction, so thAt AN ArRay of plaNes witH 2d lAtTIce potenTiAls Are fORMed in The $x$–$Y$ PlAne, with nO tunneLInG bEtween tHe Planes. eaCh oF thEse 2D pLAnes Of the pOtential Can be DIvided into two sUBplanes, again aLOnG THe $Z$-DireCtiOn, by adding a SupeRLattIce oF HaLf tHE origInal pErIOd WHich can be controllabLy SwitchEd on aNd off [@sebby-strAbley:06; @foellING:07]. the resulTing TWo SUbplanes then coNstitUte our replICas, and ouR goal Is that thEse pieces SHOuld have The SamE diSorDER rEalisation.
In tHE Case Of DisordeR geNerated OptIcaLly (UsiNg, E.g., speckle Patterns) ThE dIfFeRenT layeRS exhibit ThE saMe DisOrder LAndscaPe for A suiTaBlE OriEntatioN Of THE lasErS. HOwevEr, fOr A disoRder INduCed by a sEcond specIes, THe rePlIcAs must bE produced in seVeRal steps. We StArt With a tWO-Species mIxture in the undivided plaNE. A fast rAmpIng up Of thE optical lAttIce depTh wIThin thE plane For thE dIsoRDEr speCIEs ResUlTs in a PoissONIan DistrIbUtioN of partIcles in the lattice. THE neXt step is then a FilTeriNG PrOceDUrE RemOvINg sINGly-occupied siteS and keepinG oNLy Doubly-occuPIed AnD unoccuPied sitEs (whiCH are disTributed rAndomly). SuCh A filTERinG procedure Has been aChieved in REcent EXpErimeNts Where aToMs aRe comBined tO fesHbach MolecuLeS, and atOms reMaIning unpAired are removed from the sYstem uSing a ComBination oF miCRowAve and optIcal Fields that Is eNerGy-selEctIVe basEd on THe MolECular BindINg energy [@wINkLer:06]. fINaLly, the superLATTicE is apPliED adiabAticAlly providing a douBLe | replica theory of spin gl asses [@pa risi: 83] .
Me asur emen t of the overl a p fu nction {#sect:q_measur ement }= ==== = == ===== ======= = == = = === == == ===
\ [s ec:me as\ ]
In t his sectio n w eoutline thek ey process o f t his work, i. e., the b as ice xperi men tal p rocedu r e by w hich phys ic a l repl i cas can b eprep ared and used tom ea s ure the overla p func ti o n$ q $ d efi ned in (\[ eq :q\]) . This c o ns i s t s o f three essent ial steps:( 1)initia lpre p aratio n ofdi s ord er replicas , (2 ) introdu ctiono f probe atoms a nd (3) th e m easu r em en t p ro c ess , i nvo l vin g recomb in at ion o f th e r e plic asandspect roscopy to me asu re t h e o verla p its elf. A t nostagedo we a ssume individua l ad dressabil ity o f l at tices ites,but ra ther co nsiderg lob al o p er ations and the mea su r e me nt of gl obal q u an ti t ies.
In it ial pre p a ratio n of di sorder r eplica s
- -- ------- -- ------ -- --- --- ----- - ---- ----
We consi der a situation in w h ich atoms are co n f in e d to athree-dimen sion a l op tica l l att i ce, w hichis pa r ticularly deep alon gthe $z $-dir ection, so th at an arra y o f planes wit h 2 D lattice poten tials are forme d in the$x$–$ y$ plane , with no t unneling be twe enthe p la nes. Each oft h ese2D planes of the po ten tia l c anbe dividedinto two s ub pl an es, agai n along t he $z $- dir ectio n , by a dding a s up er l att ice ofh al f theor ig inal pe ri od wh ichc anbe cont rollablyswi t ched o nand off [@sebby-stra bl ey:06; @fo el lin g:07]. T he resul ting two subplanes then constit ute ourrepl icas, and ou r goal is that t hese p ieces s hou l d have t he sa me disorderr e ali satio n.
In the ca se of disorder gen e rat ed optically(us ing, e .g .,s pe c kle p a tte r n s) the differen t layers e xh i bi t the same dis or der lan dscapefor a suitabl e orienta tion of t he las e r s.However, f or a dis order ind u ced b y a seco ndspecie s, th e rep licasm ust be p roduce din sev eralst eps. Westart with a two-specie s mixt ure i n t he undivi ded pla ne. A fas t ra mping up o f t heoptic all attic e de p th wi t hin t he p l ane for t h edis o r de r species r e s u lts in a Po i ssonia n di stribution of par t icles in the l atti c e . T hen extst ep is then a f ilt er i n g proced ur e removingsingly-o cc u piedsitesand ke eping o n l yd oubly- occu pie d and uno ccu pi e d sites ( wh i ch are dis tr ibuted rando m ly). S uch a filteringproce d u re ha s be en ac hi eved in rece nt experim ents whereatomsarecombi ned toFe shbach mo le cules, and atoms rem ainin g unpai re d ar e r emoved fro m the s yste musi ng a comb i n at i on o f mi crow ave a nd opt ical fiel d s that i s e n ergy-se le cti v e based on t he molecul arbindi n g energy [@ w inkl e r: 0 6]. F inally , thesuperla t tic eis appl ied a diabatica lly provi d ing a dou ble | replica_theory of_spin glasses [@parisi:83].
Measurement of_the overlap_function_{#sect:q_measurement}
===================================
\[sec:meas\]
In this_section_we outline the_key process of_this work, i.e., the_basic experimental procedure_by_which physical replicas can be prepared and used to measure the overlap function $q$_defined_in (\[eq:q\]). This_consists_of_three essential steps: (1) initial_preparation of disorder replicas, (2)_introduction of_probe atoms and (3) the measurement process, involving_recombination_of the replicas_and spectroscopy to measure the overlap itself. At no_stage do we assume individual addressability_of lattice sites,_but_rather_consider global operations and_the measurement of global quantities.
Initial preparation_of disorder replicas
----------------------------------------
We consider a situation_in which atoms are confined to a_three-dimensional optical lattice, which is particularly_deep along the $z$-direction, so_that an_array of planes with 2D_lattice potentials are_formed in_the $x$–$y$ plane,_with no tunneling between the planes._Each of these_2D planes of the potential can_be_divided into two_subplanes,_again_along the_$z$-direction, by adding_a_superlattice of_half_the original period which can be_controllably_switched on and off [@sebby-strabley:06; @foelling:07]. The_resulting two subplanes then_constitute_our replicas, and our_goal is that these pieces_should have the same disorder realisation.
In_the case_of disorder_generated optically (using, e.g., speckle patterns) the different layers exhibit the_same disorder landscape for a suitable_orientation of the lasers._However, for_a_disorder induced by_a_second species,_the replicas must be produced in several_steps. We_start with a two-species mixture in_the undivided plane. A_fast_ramping up of the optical lattice_depth within the plane for the_disorder species results in a_Poissonian_distribution_of particles in the lattice._The next step is then a_filtering procedure removing_singly-occupied sites and keeping only doubly-occupied and_unoccupied_sites (which are distributed randomly). Such_a_filtering procedure has been achieved in_recent_experiments_where atoms are combined to_Feshbach molecules, and atoms remaining unpaired_are removed from the system using a combination of_microwave and optical_fields that is energy-selective based_on_the_molecular binding energy [@winkler:06]. Finally, the superlattice is applied adiabatically_providing a_double |
s$ [@ref:POWHEG2009; @ref:singletop-mcgen].
Kinematic properties of background events associated with the $W$+jets and $Z$+jets processes are simulated using a leading-order MC generator [@ref:alpgen], and those of diboson processes ($WW$, $WZ$ and $ZZ$) and are modeled using MC [@ref:pythia]. In all cases is used to model proton remnants and simulate the hadronization of all generated partons. All MC events are processed through -based detector simulations [@ref:geant].
Predictions for the normalization of simulated background-process contributions are estimated using both simulation and data. Data are used to normalize the $W$ plus light-flavor and heavy-flavor jet contributions using enriched $W$+jets data samples that have negligible signal. All other simulated background samples are normalized to the theoretical cross sections at NLO combined with next-to-next-to-leading log (NNLL) resummation [@ref:tchannel-kidonakis] for $t$-channel single-top-quark production, at next-to-NLO [@ref:ttbar-xsec] for, at NLO [@ref:mcfm] for $Z$+jets and diboson production, and including all relevant higher-order QCD and electroweak corrections for Higgs-boson production [@ref:higgs-xsec]. Differences observed between simulated events and data in lepton and jet reconstruction efficiencies, resolutions, jet-energy scale (JES), and $b$-tagging efficiencies are adjusted in the simulation to match the data, through correction functions obtained from measurements in independent data samples.
Analysis Overview
=================
D0 has optimized the single top analysis from Ref. [@ref:t-channel-new] to enhance the sensitivity to the $s$-channel in the $\ell\nu bb$ final state, and has improved the selection by employing a newer more efficient $b$-tagging algorithm. In the new analysis [@ref:Abazov:2013qka] the events are split into four independent channels depending on the jet multiplicity and the number of $b$-tagged jets. Three multivariate methods are applied to the selected data: Boosted Decision Trees (BDT), Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN), and Matrix Element probability calculations (ME). They are optimized to measure the $s | s$ [ @ref: POWHEG2009; @ref: singletop - mcgen ].
Kinematic properties of background events associated with the $ W$+jets and $ Z$+jets summons are simulate using a leading - order MC generator [ @ref: alpgen ], and those of diboson process ($ WW$, $ WZ$ and $ ZZ$) and are modeled using MC [ @ref: pythia ]. In all case is used to model proton remnants and simulate the hadronization of all generated partons. All MC events are action through -based detector simulations [ @ref: geant ].
Predictions for the standardization of simulated background - process contributions are estimated using both simulation and datum. Data are used to normalize the $ W$ plus clean - flavor and heavy - spirit jet contribution using enriched $ W$+jets data samples that have negligible signal. All early simulated background samples are normalized to the theoretical cross sections at NLO blend with next - to - next - to - leading log (NNLL) resummation [ @ref: tchannel - kidonakis ] for $ t$-channel single - top - quark production, at next - to - NLO [ @ref: ttbar - xsec ] for, at NLO [ @ref: mcfm ] for $ Z$+jets and diboson production, and including all relevant higher - ordering QCD and electroweak corrections for Higgs - boson output [ @ref: higgs - xsec ]. dispute observed between simulated events and datum in lepton and jet reconstruction efficiency, resolutions, jet - department of energy scale (JES), and $ b$-tagging efficiencies are adjusted in the simulation to match the data, through correction functions obtained from measurements in independent data sample.
Analysis Overview
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
D0 has optimized the individual top analysis from Ref. [ @ref: t - channel - new ] to enhance the sensitivity to the $ s$-channel in the $ \ell\nu bb$ final state, and has better the selection by employing a newer more effective $ b$-tagging algorithm. In the new psychoanalysis [ @ref: Abazov:2013qka ] the events are split into four independent channels depending on the fountain multiplicity and the number of $ b$-tagged jet. Three multivariate methods are apply to the selected datum: Boosted Decision Trees (BDT), Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN), and Matrix Element probability calculations (ME). They are optimized to quantify the $ s | s$ [@rev:POWHEG2009; @ref:singletop-mcgek].
Kinematic propettues of backgdound evdnts associated with the $W$+jevs abd $Z$+jtns processes are simuuated usijg a leaeing-ieder MC geisrator [@rcy:alpgsk], and vhose of dibosok processes ($WW$, $WZ$ and $ZZ$) dna cre modeled using MC [@ref:pythia]. In all cases os used to model prouon remhants and simulate the hadronizatikn of anl generated lartons. All MC events are orocfssed through -basef detector wimujqtions [@ref:geavt].
Predictions for the hormalization of simulated backerounb-process cobteibkjions are esvimateq using both simulathon and data. Data are usxd ti normalize the $W$ pluv light-flavor and reavy-flavmr jet contributionw ysing enrhchea $W$+jdts deta samplfs vhat have nsgligible sugnal. All other similwnrd backgrouns sampjef are normalized to the theoretical crovs aections at NLO combinee with next-to-next-to-lewding log (NNLL) resummation [@ref:tchannel-kidonakis] for $t$-channen sinjld-tok-qmwfj oroduction, at next-to-NLO [@ref:ttbar-xsec] for, at NLJ [@deg:mbfm] for $Z$+jets and diboson prpdkcyyon, and incluaing all delevant higher-ordfr QCD wnd eoectroweah cotrections for Higgs-boson priduction [@ref:hpggs-zsec]. Differences oyserved betwzen sikulatrd events and data in lzpton znd jet reclnstructikv efficiencies, rdsokudions, jeu-dnergy scale (JES), wnd $b$-taggmng eyficienckes sre adtusted in hhe slkulation to match hhe dcta, tvrough corgection functions obtained from measurements on ingependenc data samples.
Analyfis Overview
=================
D0 kas optiiized the singlv top ananysis from Wef. [@ref:t-channen-jew] to enhanre the segsituvitt to thd $s$-channel in tne $\ell\nu yy$ final srate, and has improyed tfs selection by zokliying a newer kord esfpcixnt $b$-edgging algorhthm. In yhe ndw analysis [@vef:Xbazpv:2013qka] the events are spljt into four indeprnqent chabnels de[ending on thr jet multiplicity and vhe nuober pf $f$-tagged jets. Three multivariats methods arc applied to ehe welected datc: Boosted Decision Trees (BDT), Bayesian Nenral Networks (BNN), and Mqtrix Element probayikity calculetions (ME). They dre optimized to meawure the $s | s$ [@ref:POWHEG2009; @ref:singletop-mcgen]. Kinematic properties of background with $W$+jets and processes are simulated [@ref:alpgen], those of diboson ($WW$, $WZ$ and and are modeled using MC [@ref:pythia]. all cases is used to model proton remnants and simulate the hadronization of generated partons. All MC events are processed through -based detector simulations [@ref:geant]. Predictions the of background-process are estimated using both simulation and data. Data are used to normalize the $W$ plus light-flavor heavy-flavor jet contributions using enriched $W$+jets data samples have negligible signal. All simulated background samples are normalized the cross sections NLO with log (NNLL) resummation for $t$-channel single-top-quark production, at next-to-NLO [@ref:ttbar-xsec] for, at NLO [@ref:mcfm] for $Z$+jets and diboson production, and all relevant and electroweak for production Differences observed between and data in lepton and jet jet-energy scale (JES), and $b$-tagging efficiencies are adjusted the simulation match the data, through correction functions from measurements in independent data samples. Analysis Overview D0 has optimized the single top analysis from Ref. [@ref:t-channel-new] to enhance the sensitivity to in the $\ell\nu bb$ state, and has the by a more efficient algorithm. In the new analysis [@ref:Abazov:2013qka] the events are split into independent channels depending on the jet multiplicity and the number jets. multivariate methods are to the selected data: Decision (BDT), Bayesian Neural Networks Matrix probability are to the $s | s$ [@ref:POWHEG2009; @ref:singletop-mcgEn].
KinematiC propErtIes Of BackGrouNd events associATed wIth the $W$+jets and $Z$+jets proCesseS aRE simULaTed usIng a leaDInG-ORdeR Mc gEneRaTOr [@Ref:alPgeN], and thoSe of dibosoN prOcEsses ($WW$, $WZ$ and $zz$) aNd are modelEd uSing MC [@ref:pytHia]. in all cAsEs iS Used tO moDel prOton reMNants aNd simulatE tHE hadroNIzation OF AlL genErated partons. All Mc EvENts are processeD throuGh -BAsED DetEctOr simulatiOnS [@ref:gEAnt].
PredICtIONS foR The normalizatIon of simulaTEd bAckgroUnD-prOCess coNtribUtIOns Are estimateD usiNg both simUlatioN And data. dAta are uSed to nOrmAliZe thE $w$ pLuS liGhT-FlaVOr And HEavY-flavor jEt CoNtribUtioNS USIng eNriChed $w$+jets Data samples thAt hAve nEGliGible SignaL. All OtHer siMulateD backGrOund samples are nOrmaLized to thE thEoRetIcAl croSS sectiOns At NlO combiNed with NExt-To-NEXT-tO-leading log (NNLL) resUmMATiOn [@ref:tchAnnel-kIDoNaKIs] for $t$-chAnNel SingLE-Top-quArk pROdUction, at Next-to-nlO [@ReF:ttbar-xSeC] for, at nLo [@reF:mcFm] for $z$+Jets And dibOson prodUctioN, And including alL Relevant higheR-OrDER Qcd and EleCtroweak corRectIOns fOr HiGGs-BosON prodUctioN [@rEF:hIGgs-xsec]. Differences oBsErved bEtweeN simulated eveNts and data IN LEpton and Jet rECoNStruction efficIenciEs, resolutiONs, jet-eneRgy scAle (JES), anD $b$-tagging EFFicienciEs aRe aDjuSteD IN tHe simulation tO MAtch ThE data, thRouGh correCtiOn fUncTioNs Obtained fRom measuReMeNtS iN inDepenDEnt data sAmPleS.
ANalYsis OVErview
=================
d0 has oPtimIzEd THe sIngle toP AnALYsis FrOm ref. [@rEf:t-ChAnnel-New] tO EnhAnce the SensitiviTy tO The $s$-ChAnNel in thE $\ell\nu bb$ final StAte, and has iMpRovEd the sELEction by Employing a newer more effiCIent $b$-taGgiNg algOritHm. In the neW anAlysis [@Ref:aBazov:2013qKa] the eVents ArE spLIT into FOUr IndEpEndent chanNELs dEpendInG on tHe jet muLtiplicity and the nuMBer Of $b$-tagged jets. thrEe muLTIvAriATe MEthOdS Are APPlied to the selecTed data: BooStED DEcision TreES (BDt), BAyesian neural NEtworKS (BNN), and matrix EleMent probaBiLity CALcuLations (ME). THey are opTimized to MEasurE ThE $s | s$ [@ref:POWHEG2009; @ref: singletop- mcgen ].
Ki ne mati c pr operties of ba c kgro und events associatedwithth e $W$ + je ts an d $Z$+j e ts p roc es se s a re si mulat edusing a leading-o rde rMC generator [@ ref:alpgen ],and those of di bosonpr oce s ses ( $WW $, $W Z$ and $ZZ$)and are m od e led us i ng MC [ @ r ef :pyt hia]. In all case s i s used to model proto nr em n a nts an d simulate t he ha d ronizat i on o f al l generated pa rtons. AllM C e ventsar e p r ocesse d thr ou g h - based detec torsimulatio ns [@r e f:geant ] .
Pred iction s f orthen or ma liz at i ono fsim u lat ed backg ro un d-pro cess c o n trib uti onsare e stimated usin g b oths imu latio n and dat a. Data are u sed t onormalize the $ W$ p lus light -fl av oran d hea v y-flav orjet contri butions usi ng e n ri ched $W$+jets data s a m pl es thathave n e gl ig i ble sign al . A ll o t h er si mula t ed backgro und sa m pl es are no rm alized t o t hetheor e tica l cros s sectio ns at NLO combined w i th next-to-ne x t- t o -l e adin g l og (NNLL) r esum m atio n [@ r ef :tc h annel -kido na k is ] for $t$-channel si ng le-top -quar k production, at next-t o - N LO [@ref :ttb a r- x sec] for, at N LO [@ ref:mcfm]f or $Z$+j ets a nd dibos on produc t i on, andinc lud ing al l re levant higher - o rder Q CD andele ctrowea k c orr ect ion sfor Higgs -boson p ro du ct io n [ @ref: h iggs-xse c] . D if fer ences observ ed be twee nsi m ula ted eve n ts a nd d at ain l ept on andjetr eco nstruct ion effic ien c ies, r es olution s, jet-energy s cale (JES) ,and $b$-t a g ging eff iciencies are adjustedi n the s imu latio n to match th e d ata, t hro u gh cor rectio n fun ct ion s obtai n e dfro mmeasuremen t s in inde pe nden t datasamples.
Analysis Ove rview
======= === ==== = = =
D0 ha s op ti m ize d the single topanalysis f ro m R ef. [@ref: t -ch an nel-new ] to en hance the sen sitivityto the $s $- chan n e l i n the $\el l\nu bb$ final st a te, a n dhas i mpr oved t he se lecti on bye mpl oying a new er moreeffic ie nt $b$-t agging algorithm. In th e newanaly sis [@ref:Ab azo v :20 13qka] th e ev ents are s pli t i nto f our indep ende n tcha n nelsdepe n ding on t h ejet m ul tiplicity a n d the numb ero f $b$- tagg ed jets. Three mu l tivariate meth odsa r e a ppl i ed t othe selected d ata :B o osted De ci sion Trees(BDT), B ay e sianNeural Netwo rks (BN N ) ,a nd Mat rixEle ment prob abi li t y calcu la ti o ns (ME ). T he y areoptimi z ed t o measure the $s | s$ [@ref:POWHEG2009; @ref:singletop-mcgen].
Kinematic_properties of_background events associated with_the $W$+jets_and_$Z$+jets processes_are_simulated using a_leading-order MC generator [@ref:alpgen],_and those of diboson_processes ($WW$, $WZ$_and_$ZZ$) and are modeled using MC [@ref:pythia]. In all cases is used to model proton_remnants_and simulate_the_hadronization_of all generated partons. All_MC events are processed through_-based detector_simulations [@ref:geant].
Predictions for the normalization of simulated background-process contributions_are_estimated using both_simulation and data. Data are used to normalize the_$W$ plus light-flavor and heavy-flavor jet_contributions using enriched_$W$+jets_data_samples that have negligible_signal. All other simulated background samples_are normalized to the theoretical cross_sections at NLO combined with next-to-next-to-leading log_(NNLL) resummation [@ref:tchannel-kidonakis] for $t$-channel single-top-quark production,_at next-to-NLO [@ref:ttbar-xsec] for, at NLO [@ref:mcfm]_for $Z$+jets_and diboson production, and including_all relevant higher-order_QCD and_electroweak corrections for_Higgs-boson production [@ref:higgs-xsec]. Differences observed between simulated_events and data_in lepton and jet reconstruction efficiencies,_resolutions,_jet-energy scale (JES),_and_$b$-tagging_efficiencies are_adjusted in the_simulation_to match_the_data, through correction functions obtained from_measurements_in independent data samples.
Analysis Overview
=================
D0 has optimized_the single top analysis_from_Ref. [@ref:t-channel-new] to enhance the_sensitivity to the $s$-channel in_the $\ell\nu bb$ final state, and_has improved_the selection_by employing a newer more efficient $b$-tagging algorithm. In the new_analysis [@ref:Abazov:2013qka] the events are split into_four independent channels depending_on the_jet_multiplicity and the_number_of $b$-tagged_jets. Three multivariate methods are applied to_the selected_data: Boosted Decision Trees (BDT), Bayesian_Neural Networks (BNN), and_Matrix_Element probability calculations (ME). They are_optimized to measure the $s |
a_1}{\rm ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1-p_2}\right|. \eqno(4.36)$$ In terms of the angular variable $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ defined by (4.6) and (4.7), this expression can be rewritten in the form $$\Delta x_1={1\over a_1}\,{\rm ln}\left|{\sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1+\gamma_2\right)\over \sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\right)}\right|,
\quad a_1=\sqrt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kappa\rho^2)}\,\sin\,\gamma_1,\qquad 0<\gamma_1<\pi. \eqno(4.37)$$
We can perform the similar asymptotic analysis while keeping $\theta_2$ fixed. Hence, we quote only the final results. As $t\rightarrow -\infty$, the expressions corresponding to (4.29) and (4.31) read respectively $$f_2\sim 1+{\kappa-{\rm i}p_2\over p_2+p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*,\qquad g_2\sim 1-{\kappa+{\rm i}p_2^*\over p_2+p_2^*}{p_2\over p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*, \eqno(4.38)$$ $$u_2 \sim u_1(\theta_2+\Delta \theta_2^{(-)}), \quad \Delta\theta_2^{(-)}=0. \eqno(4.39)$$ As $t\rightarrow \infty$, on the other hand, they take the form $$f_2 \sim {\kappa-{\rm i}p_1\over p_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\left\{1+{(\kappa-{\rm i}p_2)(p_1-p_2)(p_1^*-p_2^*)\over (p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(p_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\right\}, \eqno(4.40a)$$ $$g_2 \sim -{\kappa+{\rm i}p_1 | a_1}{\rm ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1 - p_2}\right|. \eqno(4.36)$$ In terms of the angular variable $ \gamma_1 $ and $ \gamma_2 $ defined by (4.6) and (4.7), this expression can be rewrite in the human body $ $ \Delta x_1={1\over a_1}\,{\rm ln}\left|{\sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1+\gamma_2\right)\over \sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\right)}\right|,
\quad a_1=\sqrt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kappa\rho^2)}\,\sin\,\gamma_1,\qquad 0<\gamma_1<\pi. \eqno(4.37)$$
We can perform the similar asymptotic analysis while continue $ \theta_2 $ fixed. Hence, we quote entirely the concluding results. As $ t\rightarrow -\infty$, the expressions corresponding to (4.29) and (4.31) read respectively $ $ f_2\sim 1+{\kappa-{\rm i}p_2\over p_2+p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*,\qquad g_2\sim 1-{\kappa+{\rm i}p_2^*\over p_2+p_2^*}{p_2\over p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^ *, \eqno(4.38)$$ $ $ u_2 \sim u_1(\theta_2+\Delta \theta_2^{(-) }), \quad \Delta\theta_2^{(-)}=0. \eqno(4.39)$$ As $ t\rightarrow \infty$, on the other bridge player, they take the form $ $ f_2 \sim { \kappa-{\rm i}p_1\over p_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\left\{1+{(\kappa-{\rm i}p_2)(p_1 - p_2)(p_1^*-p_2^*)\over (p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(p_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\right\ }, \eqno(4.40a)$$ $ $ g_2 \sim -{\kappa+{\rm i}p_1 | a_1}{\rl ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1-p_2}\right|. \edno(4.36)$$ In terms of the anjular vzriable $\eamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ defined by (4.6) end (4.7), this expression can be rewfitten in the forn $$\Deora x_1={1\over a_1}\,{\cj ln}\lefb|{\fin{1\obcr 2}\leyt(\jamma_1+\gamma_2\right)\pver \sin{1\ovar 2}\left(\gamma_1-\gakmx_2\rnght)}\right|,
\quad a_1=\sqrt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kappa\rho^2)}\,\syn\,\gamma_1,\aqkad 0<\gamma_1<\pi. \eqgo(4.37)$$
We san lvrnorm the similar asymptotic analgsis whple keeping $\theta_2$ fixed. Hence, we quote only the final results. As $h\rightarrow -\infet$, the expresrions corrts'onding to (4.29) and (4.31) read respectively $$f_2\sim 1+{\kaopa-{\rm i}p_2\over p_2+p_2^*}\,e_2v_2^*,\wquwg g_2\sim 1-{\kappe+{\rm i}p_2^*\jver p_2+p_2^*}{p_2\over p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*, \eqnm(4.38)$$ $$u_2 \sim u_1(\theta_2+\Delta \tmeta_2^{(-)}), \xuae \Delta\theta_2^{(-)}=0. \eqno(4.39)$$ As $t\rightarrow \infty$, on the odhzr hand, they take the firm $$f_2 \sim {\kapoq-{\rm i}p_1\kvxr l_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\levt\{1+{(\keppa-{\rm i}p_2)(p_1-p_2)(l_1^*-p_2^*)\over (p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(p_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\right\}, \eqno(4.40a)$$ $$g_2 \som -{\jappa+{\rm i}p_1 | a_1}{\rm ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1-p_2}\right|. \eqno(4.36)$$ In terms of variable and $\gamma_2$ by (4.6) and rewritten the form $$\Delta a_1}\,{\rm ln}\left|{\sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1+\gamma_2\right)\over 2}\left(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\right)}\right|, \quad a_1=\sqrt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kappa\rho^2)}\,\sin\,\gamma_1,\qquad 0<\gamma_1<\pi. \eqno(4.37)$$ We perform the similar asymptotic analysis while keeping $\theta_2$ fixed. Hence, we quote only final results. As $t\rightarrow -\infty$, the expressions corresponding to (4.29) and (4.31) read $$f_2\sim i}p_2\over g_2\sim i}p_2^*\over p_2+p_2^*}{p_2\over p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*, \eqno(4.38)$$ $$u_2 \sim u_1(\theta_2+\Delta \theta_2^{(-)}), \quad \Delta\theta_2^{(-)}=0. \eqno(4.39)$$ As $t\rightarrow \infty$, on the hand, they take the form $$f_2 \sim {\kappa-{\rm p_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\left\{1+{(\kappa-{\rm i}p_2)(p_1-p_2)(p_1^*-p_2^*)\over (p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(p_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\right\}, \eqno(4.40a)$$ \sim -{\kappa+{\rm i}p_1 | a_1}{\rm ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1-p_2}\right|. \eqnO(4.36)$$ In terms of The anGulAr vArIablE $\gamMa_1$ and $\gamma_2$ defiNEd by (4.6) And (4.7), this expression can be RewriTtEN in tHE fOrm $$\DeLta x_1={1\oveR A_1}\,{\rM LN}\leFt|{\SiN{1\ovEr 2}\LEfT(\gammA_1+\gaMma_2\righT)\over \sin{1\ovEr 2}\lEfT(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\rIGhT)}\right|,
\quad A_1=\sqRt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kaPpa\Rho^2)}\,\sin\,\GaMma_1,\QQuad 0<\gAmmA_1<\pi. \eqNo(4.37)$$
We caN PerforM the similAr ASymptoTIc analySIS wHile Keeping $\theta_2$ fixed. hEnCE, we quote only thE final ReSUlTS. as $t\RigHtarrow -\infTy$, The exPRessionS CoRRESpoNDing to (4.29) and (4.31) read RespectivelY $$F_2\siM 1+{\kappa-{\Rm I}p_2\oVEr p_2+p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*,\Qquad G_2\sIM 1-{\kaPpa+{\rm i}p_2^*\over P_2+p_2^*}{p_2\oVer p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*, \eqnO(4.38)$$ $$u_2 \sim u_1(\THeta_2+\DelTA \theta_2^{(-)}), \qUad \DelTa\tHetA_2^{(-)}=0. \eqnO(4.39)$$ as $T\rIghTaRRow \INfTy$, oN The Other hanD, tHeY take The fORM $$F_2 \Sim {\kAppA-{\rm i}P_1\over P_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\left\{1+{(\kappa-{\Rm i}P_2)(p_1-p_2)(p_1^*-P_2^*)\OveR (p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(P_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\rIght\}, \EqNo(4.40a)$$ $$g_2 \sIm -{\kappA+{\rm i}p_1 | a_1}{\rm ln}\left|{p_1+p_ 2^*\over p _1-p_ 2}\ rig ht |. \ eqno (4.36)$$ In te r ms o f the angular variable $\ga mm a _1$a nd $\ga mma_2$d ef i n edby ( 4.6 )a nd (4.7 ),this ex pression c anbe rewritten i n t he form $$ \De lta x_1={1\o ver a_1}\ ,{ \rm ln}\l eft |{\si n{1\ov e r 2}\l eft(\gamm a_ 1 +\gamm a _2\righ t ) \o ver\sin{1\over 2}\le f t( \ gamma_1-\gamma _2\rig ht ) }\ r i ght |,\quad a_1= \s qrt{\ k appa^3\ r ho ^ 2 ( 1+\ k appa\rho^2)}\ ,\sin\,\gam m a_1 ,\qqua d0<\ g amma_1 <\pi. \ e qno (4.37)$$
W e ca n perform the s i milar a s ymptoti c anal ysi s w hile ke ep ing $ \ the t a_ 2$f ixe d. Hence ,we quot e on l y t he f ina l re sults . As $t\right arr ow - \ inf ty$,the e xpre ss ionscorres pondi ng to (4.29) and(4.3 1) read r esp ec tiv el y $$f _ 2\sim1+{ \ka ppa-{\r m i}p_2 \ ove rp _ 2 +p _2^*}\,z_2z_2^*,\q qu a d g _2\sim 1 -{\kap p a+ {\ r m i}p_2^ *\ ove r p_ 2 + p_2^* }{p_ 2 \o ver p_2^ *}\,z_ 2 z_ 2^ *, \eqn o( 4.38)$ $$$u _2\simu _1(\ theta_ 2+\Delta \the t a_2^{(-)}), \q u ad \Delta\th e ta _ 2 ^{ ( -)}= 0.\eqno(4.39) $$ A s $t\ righ t ar row \inft y$, o nt he other hand, they ta ke the f orm $ $f_2 \sim {\k appa-{\rmi } p _1\overp_1+ p _1 ^ *}\,z_1z_1^*\l eft\{ 1+{(\kappa - {\rm i}p _2)(p _1-p_2)( p_1^*-p_2 ^ * )\over ( p_2 +p_ 2^* )(p _ 1 +p _2^*)(p_2+p_1 ^ * ))}\ ,z _2z_2^* \ri ght\},\eq no( 4.4 0a) $$ $$g_2 \s im -{\ka pp a+ {\ rm i} p_1 | a_1}{\rm_ln}\left|{p_1+p_2^*\over p_1-p_2}\right|._\eqno(4.36)$$ In terms of_the angular_variable_$\gamma_1$ and_$\gamma_2$_defined by (4.6)_and (4.7), this_expression can be rewritten_in the form_$$\Delta_x_1={1\over a_1}\,{\rm ln}\left|{\sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1+\gamma_2\right)\over \sin{1\over 2}\left(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\right)}\right|,
\quad a_1=\sqrt{\kappa^3\rho^2(1+\kappa\rho^2)}\,\sin\,\gamma_1,\qquad 0<\gamma_1<\pi. \eqno(4.37)$$
We can perform the similar asymptotic_analysis_while keeping_$\theta_2$_fixed._Hence, we quote only the_final results. As $t\rightarrow -\infty$,_the expressions_corresponding to (4.29) and (4.31) read respectively $$f_2\sim_1+{\kappa-{\rm_i}p_2\over p_2+p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*,\qquad g_2\sim_1-{\kappa+{\rm i}p_2^*\over p_2+p_2^*}{p_2\over p_2^*}\,z_2z_2^*, \eqno(4.38)$$ $$u_2 \sim u_1(\theta_2+\Delta \theta_2^{(-)}),_\quad \Delta\theta_2^{(-)}=0. \eqno(4.39)$$ As $t\rightarrow_\infty$, on the_other_hand,_they take the form_$$f_2 \sim {\kappa-{\rm i}p_1\over p_1+p_1^*}\,z_1z_1^*\left\{1+{(\kappa-{\rm i}p_2)(p_1-p_2)(p_1^*-p_2^*)\over_(p_2+p_2^*)(p_1+p_2^*)(p_2+p_1^*))}\,z_2z_2^*\right\}, \eqno(4.40a)$$ $$g_2 \sim -{\kappa+{\rm i}p_1 |
_1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$ such that $f( x, t)= x+ r_1 t_1+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Let $t_k'= t_k+ t_{ k+ 1}$, $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, and $t_j'= t_j$ for all $j\notin\{ k, k+ 1\}$. By $r_k\ge r_{ k+ 1}$, we know that $x+\dotsm+ r_k t_k'\ge b_k$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_{ k+ 1} t_{ k+ 1}'\ge b_{ k+ 1}'$, hence $x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j'\ge b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Hence this new run is also accepting, and $x+ r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n'+
p_n\ge f( x, t)$. Because $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, this also yields an accepting run through the RTEA for $f'$, showing that $f'( x, t)\ge
f( x, t)$.
The other inequality, $f( x, t)\ge f'( x, t)$, is clear if $f'( x, t)= \bot$. Otherwise, there is an accepting run through the RTEA for $f'$. Hence we have $t_1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$, with $t_{ k+ 1}= 0$, such that $f'( x, t)= x+ r_1 t_1+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. But then this is also an accepting run through the RTEA for $f$, showing that $f(
x, t)\ge f'( x, t)$.
We can hence assume that $r_1<\dotsm< r_n$. To ensure the last | _ 1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$ such that $ f (x, t)= x+ r_1 t_1 + p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $ x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for all $ j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Let $ t_k'= t_k+ t _ { k+ 1}$, $ t _ { k+ 1}'= 0 $, and $ t_j'= t_j$ for all $ j\notin\ { k, k+ 1\}$. By $ r_k\ge radius _ { k+ 1}$, we acknowledge that $ x+\dotsm+ r_k t_k'\ge b_k$ and $ x+\dotsm+ r _ { k+ 1 } t _ { k+ 1}'\ge b _ { k+ 1}'$, hence $ x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j'\ge b_j$ for all $ j= 1,\dotsc, n$. therefore this new run is also accept, and $ x+ r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n'+
p_n\ge f (x, t)$. Because $ t _ { k+ 1}'= 0 $, this also succumb an accepting run through the RTEA for $ f'$, show that $ f' (x, t)\ge
f (x, t)$.
The other inequality, $ f (x, t)\ge f' (x, t)$, is clear if $ f' (adam, t)= \bot$. differently, there is an accepting streak through the RTEA for $ f'$. Hence we have $ t_1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$, with $ thymine _ { k+ 1}= 0 $, such that $ f' (x, t)= x+ r_1 t_1 + p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $ x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for all $ j= 1,\dotsc, n$. But then this is also an accepting rivulet through the RTEA for $ f$, showing that $ f (
x, t)\ge f' (x, t)$.
We can hence assume that $ r_1<\dotsm < r_n$. To guarantee the last | _1+\dotdm+ t_n= t$ such that $f( x, t)= w+ r_1 t_1+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n j_n+ p_n$ anv $x+\dotsj+ r_j t_j\gd b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Let $t_n'= r_k+ t_{ j+ 1}$, $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, and $t_j'= t_j$ for all $j\notpn\{ k, k+ 1\}$. Bt $r_k\je r_{ k+ 1}$, we know vgat $x+\dobfm+ r_i t_k'\gz u_k$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_{ k+ 1} t_{ k+ 1}'\ge b_{ k+ 1}'$, hence $x+\dmtrm+ r_j t_j'\ge b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Hence this nrw run is also ascepuind, ans $x+ r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n'+
p_n\ge f( x, t)$. Bscause $u_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, this also yirlds an accepting run throkgh hhe RTEA for $f'$, shoaing that $f'( x, t)\dw
f( x, t)$.
The uther ineqlclity, $f( x, t)\fe f'( x, t)$, is clear if $f'( x, t)= \bot$. Uthercise, there us an dccepting rnn thrjugh the RTEA for $f'$. Vence wr have $t_1+\dotsm+ b_n= t$, xith $t_{ k+ 1}= 0$, such that $f'( x, v)= x+ r_1 t_1+ p_1+\dotsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $x+\gocsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for alo $h= 1,\dotvc, n$. But rhev tgix js alsl ai accepting run througy the RTEA for $f$, shpwybg that $f(
x, f)\ge f'( v, e)$.
We can hence assume that $r_1<\dotsm< r_n$. To tnsurs the last | _1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$ such that $f( x, r_1 p_1+\dotsm+ r_n p_n$ and $x+\dotsm+ $j= n$. Let $t_k'= t_{ k+ 1}$, k+ 1}'= 0$, and $t_j'= t_j$ all $j\notin\{ k, k+ 1\}$. By $r_k\ge r_{ k+ 1}$, we know that r_k t_k'\ge b_k$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_{ k+ 1} t_{ k+ 1}'\ge b_{ k+ hence r_j b_j$ all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Hence this new run is also accepting, and $x+ r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\dotsm+ t_n'+ p_n\ge f( x, t)$. Because $t_{ k+ 0$, this also yields accepting run through the RTEA $f'$, that $f'( t)\ge x, The other inequality, x, t)\ge f'( x, t)$, is clear if $f'( x, t)= \bot$. Otherwise, there is an accepting through the $f'$. Hence have t_n= with $t_{ k+ such that $f'( x, t)= x+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ and $x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ all $j= n$. But then this is also accepting run through the RTEA for $f$, showing $f( x, t)\ge f'( x, t)$. We can hence assume that $r_1<\dotsm< r_n$. To ensure | _1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$ such that $f( x, t)= x+ r_1 t_1+ p_1+\doTsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ aNd $x+\doTsm+ R_j t_J\gE b_j$ fOr alL $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Let $t_k'= t_K+ T_{ k+ 1}$, $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, And $t_j'= t_j$ for all $j\notin\{ k, k+ 1\}$. BY $r_k\ge R_{ k+ 1}$, WE knoW ThAt $x+\doTsm+ r_k t_k'\GE b_K$ ANd $x+\DoTsM+ r_{ k+ 1} T_{ k+ 1}'\GE b_{ K+ 1}'$, hencE $x+\dOtsm+ r_j t_J'\ge b_j$ for alL $j= 1,\dOtSc, n$. Hence this NEw Run is also aCcePting, and $x+ r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\DotSm+ r_n t_n'+
P_n\Ge f( X, T)$. BecaUse $T_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, thiS also yIElds an Accepting RuN ThrougH The RTEA FOR $f'$, ShowIng that $f'( x, t)\ge
f( x, t)$.
ThE OtHEr inequality, $f( x, T)\ge f'( x, t)$, Is CLeAR If $f'( X, t)= \bOt$. OtherwisE, tHere iS An accepTInG RUN thROugh the RTEA foR $f'$. Hence we haVE $t_1+\dOtsm+ t_n= T$, wIth $T_{ K+ 1}= 0$, such tHat $f'( x, T)= x+ R_1 T_1+ p_1+\dOtsm+ r_n t_n+ p_n$ aNd $x+\dOtsm+ r_j t_j\gE b_j$ for ALl $j= 1,\dotsC, N$. But theN this iS alSo aN accEPtInG ruN tHRouGH tHe RteA fOr $f$, showiNg ThAt $f(
x, t)\Ge f'( x, T)$.
wE CAn heNce AssuMe thaT $r_1<\dotsm< r_n$. To enSurE the LAst | _1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$ such th at $f( x,t)= x + r _1t_ 1+ p _1+\ dotsm+ r_n t_n + p_n $ and $x+\dotsm+ r_j t _j\ge b _ j$ f o rall $ j= 1,\d o ts c , n$ .Le t $ t_ k '= t_k+ t_ { k+ 1} $, $t_{ k+ 1} '= 0$, and $t_ j '= t_j$ forall $j\notin\{k,k+ 1\} $. By $r_k\ ger_{ k + 1}$, we kno w that $x +\ d otsm+r _k t_k' \ g eb_k$ and $x+\dotsm+ r _ {k + 1} t_{ k+ 1} '\ge b _{ k+ 1 }'$ , h ence $x+\d ot sm+ r _ j t_j'\ g eb _ j $ f o r all $j= 1,\ dotsc, n$.H enc e this n ewr un isalsoac c ept ing, and $x + r_ 1 t_1'+ p _1+\do t sm+ r_n t_n'+
p_n\g e f ( x , t) $ .Be cau se $t_ { k + 1 } '=0$, this a ls o yie ldsa n a ccep tin g ru n thr ough the RTEA fo r $f ' $,showi ng th at $ f' ( x,t)\ge f(x, t)$.
The othe r in equality, $f (x,t) \ge f ' ( x, t )$, is clearif $f'( x,t) = \ bo t$. Otherwise, the re i san accep ting r u nth r ough the R TEA for $ f'$.Henc e w e have $ t_1+\d o ts m+ t_n= t $, with$t _{k+1}= 0 $ , su ch tha t $f'( x , t)= x+ r_1 t_1+ p_ 1 +\dotsm+ r_nt _n + p_ n $ an d $ x+\dotsm+ r _j t _ j\ge b_j $ f ora ll $j = 1,\ do t sc , n$. But then thisis alsoan ac cepting run t hrough the R T EA for $ f$,s ho w ing that $f(
x, t )\ge f'( x , t)$.
W e can hence a ssume tha t $r_1<\do tsm < r _n$ . T o en sure the last | _1+\dotsm+ t_n=_t$ such_that $f( x, t)=_x+ r_1_t_1+_p_1+\dotsm+ r_n_t_n+_p_n$ and $x+\dotsm+_r_j t_j\ge b_j$_for all $j= 1,\dotsc,_n$. Let $t_k'=_t_k+_t_{ k+ 1}$, $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$, and $t_j'= t_j$ for all $j\notin\{ k,_k+_1\}$. By_$r_k\ge_r_{_k+ 1}$, we know that_$x+\dotsm+ r_k t_k'\ge b_k$ and_$x+\dotsm+ r_{_k+ 1} t_{ k+ 1}'\ge b_{ k+ 1}'$,_hence_$x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j'\ge_b_j$ for all $j= 1,\dotsc, n$. Hence this new_run is also accepting, and $x+_r_1 t_1'+ p_1+\dotsm+_r_n_t_n'+
_ p_n\ge f( x,_t)$. Because $t_{ k+ 1}'= 0$,_this also yields an accepting run_through the RTEA for $f'$, showing that_$f'( x, t)\ge
f( x,_t)$.
The other inequality, $f( x,_t)\ge f'(_x, t)$, is clear if_$f'( x, t)=_\bot$. Otherwise,_there is an_accepting run through the RTEA for_$f'$. Hence we_have $t_1+\dotsm+ t_n= t$, with $t_{_k+_1}= 0$, such_that_$f'(_x, t)=_x+ r_1 t_1+_p_1+\dotsm+_r_n t_n+_p_n$_and $x+\dotsm+ r_j t_j\ge b_j$ for_all_$j= 1,\dotsc, n$. But then this is_also an accepting run_through_the RTEA for $f$,_showing that $f(
x,_t)\ge f'( x, t)$.
We can hence_assume that_$r_1<\dotsm< r_n$._To ensure the last |
$(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are such, that one is ‘looking into the node’ of the radiation characteristics of the ZRS, whereas for smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ one is looking at the maximum (see the inset). Hence there is a strong asymmetry around $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the angles $\Theta$ becomes smaller, one is no longer sampling the node and the the intensity is much more symmetric around $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features seen in the cuprates. We therefore proceed to address potential applications in experiment. Thereby the main goal is to find experimental conditions under which the ZRS-derived state at a given momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$ can be observed with the highest intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of the photon polarization and the Brillouin zone in which we are measuring.\
We first consider the case of normal incidence of the light, that means the electric field vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$ in the plane will change the intensity from the ZRS-derived states in a systematic way, and for some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the ZRS has a definite parity under reflections by these directions. For momenta $\bbox{k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$ has to be perpendicular to $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this symmetry analysis is not possible and one has to calculate the optimum direction. We note that apart from merely enhancing the intensity of the ZRS, knowledge of the polarization dependence of the ARPES intensity of the ‘ideal’ ZRS would allow also to separate the original signal from ZRS-derived states from any ‘background’, that means photoelectrons which have undergone inelastic scattering on their way to the analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or less lost the information about the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution should be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS and perpendicular to | $ (\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are such, that one is ‘ looking into the node ’ of the radiation characteristics of the ZRS, whereas for little $ \bbox{k}_{\|}$ one is expect at the maximum (visualize the gusset). Hence there is a solid asymmetry around $ (\pi,0)$. increase the energy to $ \ge 30 eV$ the angle $ \Theta$ becomes smaller, one is no longer sample the node and the the intensity is much more symmetric around $ (\pi,0)$.\
As indicate in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features attend in the cuprates. We therefore proceed to cover potential applications in experiment. Thereby the chief goal is to detect experimental conditions under which the ZRS - derived state at a given momentum $ { \bf k}_{\|}$ can be observed with the high intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of the photon polarization and the Brillouin zone in which we are measuring.\
We first consider the case of normal incidence of the light, that means the electric field vector $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2 $ plane. Rotating $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ in the plane will change the volume from the ZRS - derived states in a taxonomic direction, and for some slant $ \Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $ (1,1)$ or $ (1,0)$ the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the ZRS get a definite parity under reflections by these directions. For momenta $ \bbox{k}$ along $ (1,1)$ $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ accept to be perpendicular to $ \bbox{k}$, whereas along $ (1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau ]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this symmetry analysis is not potential and one has to account the optimum direction. We note that apart from merely enhancing the intensity of the ZRS, cognition of the polarization dependence of the ARPES intensity of the ‘ ideal ’ ZRS would allow also to separate the original signal from ZRS - derived states from any ‘ background ’, that means photoelectron which have undergone inelastic scattering on their way to the analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or less fall back the information about the polarization of the incoming luminosity, their contribution should be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘ optimum angle ’ for the ZRS and perpendicular to | $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) ave such, that one is ‘looning ihto the vode’ of the radiation characveriwtics of the ZRS, whereas fof smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ obe iw looking av the mawnmum (ace thz mnset). Hence thete is a strotg asymmetry asojnb $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the anblfs $\Theta$ becomgs smsjler, one is no longer sampling the nods and tie the intensitu is much more symmetric agounf $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in thf preceding dissyssion, our tfeory reproduced, despije its simplicity, some experimengal fzatures seeb un hve cuprates. We trerefore progved to dddress potential appkicetiobs in experiment. Therxby the main goal is to find ax'erimental conditions ubder fhicv thd ZRR-dedited state at a given mkmentum ${\bf j}_{\|}$ can be observed wotr the highest jntensytr. To that end, we can vary different exptrimehtal parameters, mainly rhe direction of the khoton polwrization and the Brillouin zone in which we are keasucivg.\
Wt nlrst xojsider the case of normal incidence of the lidgt, tmat means the elcctric field vectot $\hbpv{\epsilon}$ is iv the EhO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bblx{\epsiljn}$ in the plant wilk change the intensity from the ZRS-derined wtates in a systemctic way, and for some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be oaxijum. Along hlgh symmeffy directions liye $(1,1)$ os $(1,0)$ the okgimal polarizatiog can be veduczd by syometty consyderations, becamve the ZRS has a dffinije parhty under geflections by these directions. For momenta $\bnof{k}$ dlong $(1,1)$ $\byox{\epsllon}$ has to be [erpendicular jo $\bbox{k}$, cherear along $(1,0)$ in must be parallel[@ShqnDessau]. For tlnsymmetric komenta, rowecer, rhis syooetry analysis is not possible ane one has to calcukatg fhe optimum dirzetuon. We note thay aoare vrpm kerely enhanwing thd intevsity of thc ZFS, kmowledge of the polasizafion dependence of tme ARPES untensitr of the ‘ideak’ ZRS would allow wlso vo seperate yhe original signal from ZRS-derivsd states frjm any ‘backgwoune’, that means photoelectrons which have undergone inxlastic scattering on jheir way to the analizev. Since it ix platsible thdt these background wlectrons have move or less lost the inrormathon ahout the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution should be unsensmtyve to poladizayion. Naknng the s[ectcuo at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS and perpendirular to | $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are one ‘looking into node’ of the whereas smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ one looking at the (see the inset). Hence there is strong asymmetry around $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the angles becomes smaller, one is no longer sampling the node and the the intensity much symmetric $(\pi,0)$.\ shown in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features seen in cuprates. We therefore proceed to address potential applications experiment. Thereby the main is to find experimental conditions which ZRS-derived state a momentum k}_{\|}$ can be with the highest intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of photon polarization Brillouin zone which are We first consider of normal incidence of the light, electric field vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2$ Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$ the plane will change the intensity the ZRS-derived states in a systematic way, and some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ polarization can be deduced symmetry considerations, because ZRS a parity reflections by directions. For momenta $\bbox{k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$ has to be perpendicular $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric this analysis is not and one has to the direction. We note that merely the ZRS, of polarization dependence of the intensity of the ‘ideal’ ZRS allow also to separate states from any ‘background’, that means photoelectrons which undergone inelastic scattering on their way to analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or lost the the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution be insensitive to polarization. the spectrum at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS perpendicular | $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are sucH, that one is ‘LookiNg iNto ThE nodE’ of tHe radiation chaRActeRistics of the ZRS, whereas For smAlLEr $\bbOX{k}_{\|}$ One is Looking AT tHE MaxImUm (See ThE InSet). HeNce There is A strong asyMmeTrY around $(\pi,0)$. IncREaSing the eneRgy To $\ge 30 eV$ the angLes $\theta$ bEcOmeS SmallEr, oNe is nO longeR SampliNg the node AnD The the INtensitY IS mUch mOre symmetric arounD $(\Pi,0)$.\
aS shown in the preCeding DiSCuSSIon, Our Theory reprOdUced, dESpite itS SiMPLIciTY, some experimeNtal featureS SeeN in the CuPraTEs. We thErefoRe PRocEed to addresS potEntial appLicatiONs in expERiment. THereby The MaiN goaL Is To FinD eXPerIMeNtaL ConDitions uNdEr Which The Zrs-DERiveD stAte aT a givEn momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$ Can Be obSErvEd witH the hIgheSt IntenSity. To That eNd, We can vary differEnt eXperimentAl pArAmeTeRs, maiNLy the dIreCtiOn of the Photon pOLarIzATIOn And the Brillouin zonE iN WHiCh we are mEasuriNG.\
WE fIRst consiDeR thE casE OF normAl inCIdEnce of thE light, THaT mEans the ElEctric FiEld VecTor $\bbOX{\epsIlon}$ is In the CuO$_2$ Plane. rOtating $\bbox{\epsILon}$ in the plane WIlL CHaNGe thE inTensity from The Zrs-derIved STaTes IN a sysTematIc WAy, ANd for some angle $\Phi_E$ iT wIll be mAximuM. Along high symMetry direcTIONs like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ The oPTiMAl polarization Can be Deduced by sYMmetry coNsideRations, bEcause the zrs has a defIniTe pAriTy uNDEr Reflections by THEse dIrEctions. for Momenta $\BboX{k}$ aLonG $(1,1)$ $\bbOx{\Epsilon}$ haS to be perPeNdIcUlAr tO $\bbox{K}$, Whereas aLoNg $(1,0)$ iT mUst Be parALlel[@ShEnDesSau]. FOr NoNSymMetric mOMeNTA, howEvEr, This SymMeTry anAlysIS is Not possIble and onE haS To caLcUlAte the oPtimum directiOn. we note that ApArt From meRELy enhancIng the intensity of the ZRS, KNowledgE of The poLariZation depEndEnce of The arPES inTensitY of thE ‘iDeaL’ zrS wouLD AlLow AlSo to separaTE The OrigiNaL sigNal from zRS-derived states frOM anY ‘background’, thAt mEans PHOtOelECtROns WhICh hAVE undergone inelaStic scatteRiNG oN their way tO The AnAlyzer. SInce it iS plauSIble thaT these bacKground elEcTronS HAve More or less Lost the iNformatioN About THe PolarIzaTion of ThE inCominG light, THeiR contRibutiOn Should Be insEnSitive to Polarization. Taking the spEctrum At the ‘OptImal angle’ For THe ZrS and perpEndiCular to | $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the se cond zone) aresuc h,th at o ne i s ‘looking int o the node’ of the radiatio n cha ra c teri s ti cs of the ZR S ,w h ere as f orsm a ll er $\ bbo x{k}_{\ |}$ one is lo ok ing at the m a xi mum (see t heinset). Henc e t here i sa s t rongasy mmetr y arou n d $(\p i,0)$. In cr e asingt he ener g y t o $\ ge 30 eV$ the ang l es $\Theta$ becom es sma ll e r, o neisno longersa mplin g the no d ea n d th e the intensit y is much m o resymmet ri c a r ound $ (\pi, 0) $ .\As shown in the precedin g disc u ssion,o ur theo ry rep rod uce d, d e sp it e i ts sim p li cit y , s ome expe ri me ntalfeat u r e s see n i n th e cup rates. We the ref orep roc eed t o add ress p otent ial ap plica ti ons in experime nt.Thereby t hema ingo al is to fin d e xpe rimenta l condi t ion su n d er which the ZRS-der iv e d s tate ata give n m om e ntum ${\ bf k} _{\| } $ canbe o b se rved wit h theh ig he st inte ns ity. T otha t e nd, w e can varydifferen t exp e rimental param e ters, mainlyt he d ir e ctio n o f the photo n po l ariz atio n a ndt he Br illou in zo n e in which we are m ea suring .\
We first consid er the cas e o f normal inc i de n ce of the ligh t, th at means t h e electr ic fi eld vect or $\bbox { \ epsilon} $ i s i n t heC u O$ _2$ plane. Ro t a ting $ \bbox{\ eps ilon}$inthe pl ane w ill chang e the in te ns it yfro m the ZRS-deri ve d s ta tes in a system aticway, a nd for some a n gl e $\Ph i_ E$ itwil lbe ma ximu m . A long hi gh symmet ryd irec ti on s like$(1,1)$ or $( 1, 0)$ the op ti mal polar i z ation ca n be deduced by symmetr y consid era tions , be cause the ZR S hasa d e finite parit y und er re f l ectio n s b y t he se directi o n s.For m om enta $\bbox {k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\b box{\epsilon} $ h as t o be pe r pe n dic ul a r t o $\bbox{k}$, whe reas along $ ( 1, 0)$ it mus t be p arallel [@ShenD essau ] . For n onsymmetr ic moment a, how e v er, this symm etry ana lysis isn ot po s si ble a ndone ha stocalcu late t h e o ptimu m dire ct ion. W e not ethat apa rt from merely enhancin g theinten sit y of theZRS , kn owledge o f th e polariza tio n d epend enc e of t he A R PE S i n tensi ty o f the ‘ide a l’ ZR S wo uld allow a l s o to sepa rat e the o rigi nal signal from Z R S-derived stat es f r o m a ny‘ back gr ound’, that me ans p h o toelectr on s which hav e underg on e inel asticscatte ring on t he i r wayto t heanalyzer. Si nc e it ispl au s ible t hatth ese ba ckgrou n d el e c trons have moreor le s s lost the info rm ation a b outthe polari zation of t he inc omin g lig ht, the ir contr ibu ti on shouldb e insensi tiveto pola ri zati on. Takin g th e spect rumat th e ‘optima l an g le ’f ortheZRS a nd per pendicula r to | $(\pi,0)$_(i.e. in_the second zone) are_such, that_one_is ‘looking_into_the node’ of_the radiation characteristics_of the ZRS, whereas_for smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$_one_is looking at the maximum (see the inset). Hence there is a strong asymmetry_around_$(\pi,0)$. Increasing_the_energy_to $\ge 30 eV$ the_angles $\Theta$ becomes smaller, one_is no_longer sampling the node and the the intensity_is_much more symmetric_around $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in the preceding discussion, our theory_reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental_features seen in_the_cuprates._We therefore proceed to_address potential applications in experiment. Thereby_the main goal is to find_experimental conditions under which the ZRS-derived state_at a given momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$_can be observed with the_highest intensity._To that end, we can_vary different experimental_parameters, mainly_the direction of_the photon polarization and the Brillouin_zone in which_we are measuring.\
We first consider the_case_of normal incidence_of_the_light, that_means the electric_field_vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$_is_in the CuO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$_in_the plane will change the intensity from_the ZRS-derived states in_a_systematic way, and for_some angle $\Phi_E$ it will_be maximum. Along high symmetry directions_like $(1,1)$_or $(1,0)$_the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the_ZRS has a definite parity under_reflections by these directions._For momenta_$\bbox{k}$_along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$_has_to be_perpendicular to $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it_must be_parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this_symmetry analysis is not_possible_and one has to calculate the_optimum direction. We note that apart_from merely enhancing the intensity_of_the_ZRS, knowledge of the polarization_dependence of the ARPES intensity of_the ‘ideal’ ZRS_would allow also to separate the original_signal_from ZRS-derived states from any ‘background’,_that_means photoelectrons which have undergone inelastic_scattering_on_their way to the analyzer._Since it is plausible that these_background electrons have more or less lost the information_about the polarization_of the incoming light, their_contribution_should_be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘optimal_angle’ for_the ZRS and_perpendicular to |
A first result shown by Barthélemy shows that capacities collapse to belief functions when $L$ is linear [@bar00].
Any capacity on $L$ is a belief function if and only if $L$ is a linear lattice.
In the sequel, we address the combination of belief functions and their decomposition in terms of simple support functions. We will see that classical results generalize.
\[def:drc\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two belief functions on $L$, with Möbius transforms $m_1,m_2$. The *Dempster’s rule of combination* of $\bel_1,\bel_2$ is defined through its Möbius transform $m$ by: $$m(x)=:(m_1\oplus m_2)(x):=\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2=x}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2), \quad\forall
x\in L.$$
Since $m$ defines unambiguously the belief function, we may write as well $\bel=\bel_1\oplus\bel_2$ to denote the combination.
\[prop:comb\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two belief functions on $L$, with co-Möbius transforms $q_1,q_2$, and consider their Dempster combination. Then, if $q$ denotes the co-Möbius transform of $\bel:= \bel_1\oplus\bel_2$, $$q(x)= q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \forall x\in L.$$
We have: $$q(x) = \sum_{y\geq x}\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2=y}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2) = \sum_{y_1\wedge
y_2\geq x} m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2).$$ One can decompose the above sum since if $y_1\geq x$ and $y_2\geq x$, then $y_1\wedge y_2\geq x$ and reciprocally. Thus, $$q(x) = \sum_{y_1\geq x}m(y_1)\sum_{y_2\geq | A first result shown by Barthélemy shows that capacity crack up to belief functions when $ L$ is linear [ @bar00 ].
Any capacitance on $ L$ is a belief function if and entirely if $ L$ is a analogue lattice.
In the sequel, we address the combination of belief functions and their decomposition in term of simple support functions. We will see that classical results popularize.
\[def: drc\ ] Let $ \bel_1,\bel_2 $ be two belief functions on $ L$, with Möbius transform $ m_1,m_2$. The * Dempster ’s rule of combination * of $ \bel_1,\bel_2 $ is defined through its Möbius transform $ m$ by: $ $ m(x)=:(m_1\oplus m_2)(x):=\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2 = x}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2), \quad\forall
x\in L.$$
Since $ m$ defines uniquely the belief routine, we may write equally well $ \bel=\bel_1\oplus\bel_2 $ to denote the combination.
\[prop: comb\ ] Let $ \bel_1,\bel_2 $ be two belief functions on $ L$, with cobalt - Möbius transforms $ q_1,q_2 $, and consider their Dempster combination. Then, if $ q$ denotes the co - Möbius transform of $ \bel:= \bel_1\oplus\bel_2 $, $ $ q(x)= q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \forall x\in L.$$
We have: $ $ q(x) = \sum_{y\geq x}\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2 = y}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2) = \sum_{y_1\wedge
y_2\geq x } m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2).$$ One can decompose the above kernel since if $ y_1\geq x$ and $ y_2\geq x$, then $ y_1\wedge y_2\geq x$ and reciprocally. Thus, $ $ q(x) = \sum_{y_1\geq x}m(y_1)\sum_{y_2\geq | A flrst result shown by Baruhélemy shows that capacivies comlapse tu belief functions when $L$ is lunear [@bar00].
Any capacity on $L$ ks a belivf functiin ih and only if $L$ ma a linccr lafbice.
Iu vhe sequel, we acdress the combination ox cepief functions and their decomposityon in yegms of simple fupppwt fhnctions. We will see that classicam resulus generalize.
\[def:drv\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two belief funftions on $L$, with Möhius transfirms $n_1,m_2$. The *Dempsger’s rule of combinatikn* of $\bel_1,\bel_2$ is defined through its Köbius tranwfirm $k$ by: $$m(x)=:(m_1\oplns m_2)(x):=\slm_{y_1\wedge y_2=x}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2), \quad\fmrall
x\im L.$$
Since $m$ deflnes nnamviguously the belief hunction, we may writg as well $\tem=\bel_1\oplus\bel_2$ to dwnite tve cmmbivqtiun.
\[pdo':cojb\] Let $\bem_1,\bel_2$ be twk belief fubctions on $L$, with cp-Möfpis transforma $q_1,q_2$, agd consider their Dempster combination. Thtn, if $q$ denotes the co-Möbius rransform of $\bel:= \bel_1\oklus\bel_2$, $$q(x)= q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \forall x\in L.$$
We have: $$q(x) = \sum_{y\geq x}\sum_{y_1\wegge y_2=b}m_1(h_1)m_2(y_2) = \fjn_{y_1\aedge
y_2\geq x} m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2).$$ One can decompose the abovq sim since if $y_1\geq x$ and $y_2\geq x$, tngn $y_1\wedge y_2\geq x$ and rediprocally. Thus, $$q(x) = \sum_{y_1\ggq x}m(y_1)\wum_{y_2\geq | A first result shown by Barthélemy shows collapse belief functions $L$ is linear is belief function if only if $L$ a linear lattice. In the sequel, address the combination of belief functions and their decomposition in terms of simple functions. We will see that classical results generalize. \[def:drc\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two functions $L$, Möbius $m_1,m_2$. The *Dempster’s rule of combination* of $\bel_1,\bel_2$ is defined through its Möbius transform $m$ by: m_2)(x):=\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2=x}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2), \quad\forall x\in L.$$ Since $m$ defines the belief function, we write as well $\bel=\bel_1\oplus\bel_2$ to the \[prop:comb\] Let be belief on $L$, with transforms $q_1,q_2$, and consider their Dempster combination. Then, if $q$ denotes the co-Möbius transform of $\bel:= \bel_1\oplus\bel_2$, q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \forall We have: = x}\sum_{y_1\wedge = \sum_{y_1\wedge y_2\geq One can decompose the above sum x$ and $y_2\geq x$, then $y_1\wedge y_2\geq x$ reciprocally. Thus, = \sum_{y_1\geq x}m(y_1)\sum_{y_2\geq | A first result shown by BarthéLemy shows tHat caPacItiEs CollApse To belief functiONs whEn $L$ is linear [@bar00].
Any capacIty on $l$ iS A belIEf FunctIon if anD OnLY If $L$ Is A lIneAr LAtTice.
IN thE sequel, We address tHe cOmBination of beLIeF functions And Their decompoSitIon in tErMs oF SimplE suPport FunctiONs. We wiLl see that ClASsical REsults gENErAlizE.
\[def:drc\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ bE TwO Belief functionS on $L$, wiTh mÖbIUS trAnsForms $m_1,m_2$. The *deMpsteR’S rule of COmBINAtiON* of $\bel_1,\bel_2$ is deFined througH Its möbius TrAnsFOrm $m$ by: $$M(x)=:(m_1\opLuS M_2)(x):=\sUm_{y_1\wedge y_2=x}m_1(Y_1)m_2(y_2), \qUad\forall
X\in L.$$
SiNCe $m$ defiNEs unambIguousLy tHe bElieF FuNcTioN, wE May WRiTe aS WelL $\bel=\bel_1\oPlUs\Bel_2$ to DenoTE THE comBinAtioN.
\[prop:Comb\] Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ Be tWo beLIef FunctIons oN $L$, wiTh Co-MöbIus traNsforMs $Q_1,q_2$, and consider thEir DEmpster coMbiNaTioN. THen, if $Q$ DenoteS thE co-möbius tRansforM Of $\bEl:= \BEL_1\OpLus\bel_2$, $$q(x)= q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \foRaLL X\iN L.$$
We have: $$Q(x) = \sum_{y\GEq X}\sUM_{y_1\wedge y_2=Y}m_1(Y_1)m_2(y_2) = \Sum_{y_1\WEDge
y_2\gEq x} m_1(Y_1)M_2(y_2).$$ one can deComposE ThE aBove sum SiNce if $y_1\GeQ x$ aNd $y_2\Geq x$, tHEn $y_1\wEdge y_2\gEq x$ and reCiproCAlly. Thus, $$q(x) = \sum_{y_1\GEq x}m(y_1)\sum_{y_2\geq | A first result shown by Ba rthélemy s howstha t c ap acit iescollapse to be l ieffunctions when $L$ islinea r[ @bar 0 0] .
An y capac i ty o n $ L$ i s a b e li ef fu nct ion ifand only i f $ L$ is a linear la ttice.
In th e sequel, we ad dressth e c o mbina tio n ofbelief functi ons and t he i r deco m positio n in ter ms of simple supp o rt functions. Wewill s ee th a t cl ass ical resul ts gene r alize.\[ d e f :dr c \] Let $\bel_ 1,\bel_2$ b e tw o beli ef fu n ctions on $ L$ , wi th Möbius t rans forms $m_ 1,m_2$ . The *D e mpster’ s rule of co mbin a ti on * o f$ \be l _1 ,\b e l_2 $ is def in ed thro ughi t s Möbi ustran sform $m$ by: $$m( x)= :(m_ 1 \op lus m _2)(x ):=\ su m_{y_ 1\wedg e y_2 =x }m_1(y_1)m_2(y_ 2),\quad\for all
x \in L .$$
S ince $ m$def ines un ambiguo u sly t h e be lief function, wema y wr ite as w ell $\ b el =\ b el_1\opl us \be l_2$ t o den otet he combina tion.\[ pr op:comb \] Let $ \b el_ 1,\ bel_2 $ betwo be lief fun ction s on $L$, withc o-Möbius tran s fo r m s$ q_1, q_2 $, and cons ider thei r De m ps ter combi natio n. Th e n, if $q$ denotes t he co-Mö biustransform of$\bel:= \b e l _ 1\oplus\ bel_ 2 $, $$q(x)= q_1(x) q_2(x ),\quad \f o rall x\i n L.$ $
We ha ve: $$q(x ) = \sum_{ y\g eqx}\ sum _ { y_ 1\wedge y_2=y } m _1(y _1 )m_2(y_ 2)= \sum_ {y_ 1\w edg e
y _2\geq x} m_1(y_1 )m _2 (y _2 ).$ $ One can deco mp ose t heabove sum si nce i f $y _1 \g e q x $ and $ y _2 \ g eq x $, t hen$y_ 1\ wedge y_2 \ geq x$ and reciproc all y . Th us ,$$q(x)= \sum_{y_1\g eq x}m(y_1)\ su m_{ y_2\ge q | A first_result shown_by Barthélemy shows that_capacities collapse_to_belief functions_when_$L$ is linear_[@bar00].
Any capacity on_$L$ is a belief_function if and_only_if $L$ is a linear lattice.
In the sequel, we address the combination of belief_functions_and their_decomposition_in_terms of simple support functions._We will see that classical_results generalize.
\[def:drc\]_Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two belief functions on $L$,_with_Möbius transforms $m_1,m_2$._The *Dempster’s rule of combination* of $\bel_1,\bel_2$ is defined_through its Möbius transform $m$ by:_$$m(x)=:(m_1\oplus m_2)(x):=\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2=x}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2),_\quad\forall
x\in_L.$$
Since_$m$ defines unambiguously the_belief function, we may write as_well $\bel=\bel_1\oplus\bel_2$ to denote the combination.
\[prop:comb\]_Let $\bel_1,\bel_2$ be two belief functions on_$L$, with co-Möbius transforms $q_1,q_2$, and_consider their Dempster combination. Then,_if $q$_denotes the co-Möbius transform of_$\bel:= \bel_1\oplus\bel_2$, $$q(x)=_q_1(x)q_2(x),\quad \forall_x\in L.$$
We have:_$$q(x) = \sum_{y\geq x}\sum_{y_1\wedge y_2=y}m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2) =_\sum_{y_1\wedge
y_2\geq_x} m_1(y_1)m_2(y_2).$$ One can decompose the_above_sum since if_$y_1\geq_x$_and $y_2\geq_x$, then $y_1\wedge_y_2\geq_x$ and_reciprocally._Thus, $$q(x) = \sum_{y_1\geq x}m(y_1)\sum_{y_2\geq |
}})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined by $$L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $sgn(x)$ is the sign function of $x$ and equals zero when $x=0$. Then we want to prove that there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument, it suffices to show that with high probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ for a sufficiently large constant $B$.
Let $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. Therefore, to prove the result in Theorem 3, we want to derive the upper bounds for $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show that $\forall h>0$, $\exists B$ and $M$ s.t. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.
We will first present a result from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\label{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \text{with} \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $V$ is shown as follows: $${\mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\ | } }) $. Let $ L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined by $ $ L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $ sgn(x)$ is the sign affair of $ x$ and equal zero when $ x=0$. Then we want to prove that there is a solution $ { \widehat { \mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation $ L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0 $ satisfying $ \|{\widehat { \mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2 ^ 2 = O_p(k / m)$. By authoritative convexity argument, it suffices to prove that with high probability, $ { \mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0 $ with $ \|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2 ^ 2 = Bk / m$ for a sufficiently large ceaseless $ B$.
Let $ V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $ V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev ’s inequality, $ P(V < E(V)+h\times { \mbox{SD}}(V))>1 - h^{-2}$. Therefore, to prove the solution in Theorem 3, we desire to derive the upper bounds for $ E(V)$ and $ { \mbox{SD}}(V)$ and picture that $ \forall h>0 $, $ \exists B$ and $ M$ s.t. $ \forall m > M$, $ P(V<0)>1 - h^{-2}$.
We will first present a consequence from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $ x>0 $, $ $ \label{a70 }
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x) ) \ \ \ \text{with } \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $ V$ is show as follows: $ $ { \mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\ | }})$. Leh $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be dtfined by $$L_j({\mbox{\by w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{m=1}^m b_{ij}sfn(K_i-{\mbox{\cf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $sgn(x)$ is tye sitn function of $x$ and eduals zerl when $x=0$. Thei we want to prots that bkere jd a xoit ${\widehat {\mbow{\bf w}}}$ of tha equation $L({\mbmx{\cf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. Fy clasxifal convexity wrgukqnt, jn wuffices to show that with hifh probebility, ${\mbox{\bf e}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bn/m$ flr a sufficiently parge constqnt $F$.
Oet $V={\mbox{\bf d}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, whgre $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbob{\bf b}}_n^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. Vy Chftyshev’s inewualiny, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-v^{-2}$. Theregore, to prove bhe rxsulr in Theorem 3, we want to derive the uppgr bounds xox $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and whiw thdt $\fmralu h>0$, $\dxiatx G$ and $L$ s.v. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.
We will first present a rexujn from Polya (1945), which wyll be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\nabsl{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frqc{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \texj{with} \ \ \su[_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $V$ is shown as follows: $${\mbmx{Var}}(T)=m^{-2}\rum_{n=1}^n{\ | }})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ $sgn(x)$ is the equals when $x=0$. Then want to prove there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf of the equation $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument, suffices to show that with high probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ a large $B$. $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. Therefore, to the result in Theorem 3, we want to the upper bounds for and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show that h>0$, B$ and s.t. m>M$, We will first a result from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\label{a70} \Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ variance $V$ shown as follows: | }})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be definEd by $$L_j({\mbox{\Bf w}})=m^{-1}\sUm_{i=1}^M b_{iJ}sGn(K_i-{\Mbox{\Bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ whERe $sgN(x)$ is the sign function of $x$ And eqUaLS zerO WhEn $x=0$. ThEn we wanT To PROve ThAt TheRe IS a Root ${\wIdeHat {\mbox{\Bf w}}}$ of the eqUatIoN $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satISfYing $\|{\widehaT {\mbOx{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By cLasSical cOnVexITy argUmeNt, it sUfficeS To show That with hIgH ProbabILity, ${\mboX{\BF w}}^tL({\mbOx{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=BK/M$ fOR a sufficiently Large cOnSTaNT $b$.
LeT $V={\mBox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbOx{\Bf w}})=m^{-1}\sUM_{i=1}^mV_i$, whERe $v_I=({\MBox{\BF b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgN(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^t{\MboX{\bf w}})$. By chEbySHev’s inEqualItY, $p(V<E(v)+h\times {\mbox{sD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. therefore, To provE The resuLT in TheoRem 3, we wAnt To dErivE ThE uPpeR bOUndS FoR $E(V)$ ANd ${\mBox{SD}}(V)$ anD sHoW that $\ForaLL H>0$, $\EXistS B$ aNd $M$ s.T. $\foraLl m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.
We will FirSt prESenT a resUlt frOm PoLyA (1945), whicH will bE very UsEful for our proof. for $x>0$, $$\Label{a70}
\Phi(X)=\frAc{1}{2}\big[1+\SqRt{1-\exp(-\FRac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\big](1+\DelTa(x)) \ \ \ \text{With} \ \ \sup_{X>0}|\DelTa(X)|<0.004.$$ tHE vAriance of $V$ is shown aS fOLLoWs: $${\mbox{VaR}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{I=1}^M{\ | }})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarr ow R^k$ be defi ned by $ $L_j ({\m box{\bf w}})=m ^ {-1} \sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn (K_i- {\ m box{ \ bf b}}_ i^T{\mb o x{ \ b f w }} )$ $ w he r e$sgn( x)$ is the sign func tio nof $x$ and e q ua ls zero wh en$x=0$. Thenwewant t opro v e tha t t hereis a r o ot ${\ widehat { \m b ox{\bf w}}}$ o f th e eq uation $L({\mbox{ \ bf w}})=0$ satisf ying $ \| { \w i d eha t { \mbox{\bfw} }}\|_ 2 ^2=O_p( k /m ) $ . By classical con vexity argu m ent , it s uf fic e s to s how t ha t wi th high pro babi lity, ${\ mbox{\ b f w}}^T L ({\mbox {\bf w }}) <0$ wit h $ \| {\m bo x {\b f w }}\ | _2^ 2=Bk/m$fo ra suf fici e n t l y la rge con stant $B$.
Let $V ={\ mbox { \bf w}}^ TL({\ mbox {\ bf w} })=m^{ -1}\s um _{i=1}^mV_i$, w here $V_i=({\ mbo x{ \bf b }}_i^ T {\mbox {\b f w }})sgn( K_i-{\m b ox{ \b f b }} _i^T{\mbox{\bf w}} )$ . By Chebysh ev’s i n eq ua l ity, $P( V< E(V )+h\ t i mes { \mbo x {S D}}(V))> 1-h^{- 2 }$ .Therefo re , to p ro vethe resu l t in Theor em 3, we want to derive theu pper bounds f o r$ E (V ) $ an d $ {\mbox{SD}} (V)$ andshow th at$ \fora ll h> 0$ , $ \ exists B$ and $M$ s .t . $\fo rallm>M$, $P(V<0) >1-h^{-2}$ . We willfirs t p r esent a result from Polya (19 4 5), whic h wil l be ver y usefulf o r our pr oof . F or$x> 0 $ ,$$\label{a70} \ Phi( x) =\frac{ 1}{ 2}\Big[ 1+\ sqr t{1 -\e xp (-\frac{2 }{\pi}x^ 2) }\ Bi g] (1+ \delt a (x)) \ \ \ \t ex t{w ith}\ \ \su p_{x> 0}|\ de lt a (x) |<0.004 . $$ T he v ar ia nceof$V $ isshow n as follow s: $${\mb ox{ V ar}} (V )= m^{-2}\ sum_{i=1}^m{\ | }})$. Let_$L: R^k\rightarrow_R^k$ be defined by_$$L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m_b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf_b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$_where_$sgn(x)$ is the_sign function of_$x$ and equals zero_when $x=0$. Then_we_want to prove that there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation_$L({\mbox{\bf_w}})=0$ satisfying_$\|{\widehat_{\mbox{\bf_w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument,_it suffices to show that_with high_probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ for_a_sufficiently large constant_$B$.
Let $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf_w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$._Therefore, to prove_the_result_in Theorem 3, we_want to derive the upper bounds_for $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show_that $\forall h>0$, $\exists B$ and $M$_s.t. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.
We will first_present a result from Polya_(1945), which_will be very useful for_our proof. For_$x>0$, $$\label{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x))_\ \ \_\text{with} \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance_of $V$ is_shown as follows: $${\mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\ |
of $A$ is the mapping $J_A=(A+{\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}})^{-1}$. We say that $A$ is a linear relation if ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{gra}}}A$ is a linear subspace of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\times {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$. $A$ is said to be a maximally monotone linear relation if $A$ is both maximally monotone and a linear relation. The mapping $T: {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is said to be *firmly nonexpansive* if $$(\forall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}) \quad \|Tx-Ty\|^2 + \|({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)x-({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)y\|^2 \leq \|x-y\|^2.$$ Obviously, if $T$ is firmly nonexpansive, then it is *nonexpansive*, that is, [Lipschitz continuous]{} with constant $1$, where a Lipschitz continuous mapping with constant $L$ is a mapping $T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ such that $$(\forall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}) \quad \|Tx-Ty\|\leq L\|x-y\|.$$ The mapping $T$ is said to be a *Banach contraction* if it is Lipschitz continuous with constant $L<1$. The point $x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is said to be a fixed point of the mapping $T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ if $Tx=x$. The set of all fixed points of $T$ is denoted by ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{Fix}}}T$. The function $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is said to be *proper* if ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f=\{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}{\ensuremath{\;|\;}}f(x)<\infty\}\neq\varnothing$. The *Fenchel conjugate* of the function $f$ is the function $f^*$ which is defined by $f^*(u)=\sup_{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}}({\langle{{u},{x}}\rangle}-f(x))$. The subdifferential of a proper function $ | of $ A$ is the mapping $ J_A=(A+{\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}})^{-1}$. We say that $ A$ is a linear relation if $ { \ensuremath{\operatorname{gra}}}A$ is a analogue subspace of $ { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\times { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$. $ A$ is say to be a maximally monotone linear relation back if $ A$ is both maximally flat and a linear relation. The function $ T: { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is said to be * firmly nonexpansive * if $ $ (\forall x\in { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in { \ensuremath{\mathcal hydrogen } }) \quad \|Tx - Ty\|^2 + \|({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)x-({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)y\|^2 \leq \|x - y\|^2.$$ Obviously, if $ T$ is firmly nonexpansive, then it is * nonexpansive *, that is, [ Lipschitz continuous ] { } with constant $ 1 $, where a Lipschitz continuous function with constant $ L$ is a mapping $ T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ such that $ $ (\forall x\in { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in { \ensuremath{\mathcal H } }) \quad \|Tx - Ty\|\leq L\|x - y\|.$$ The mapping $ T$ is say to be a * Banach contraction * if it is Lipschitz continuous with constant $ L<1$. The point $ x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is said to be a fixed detail of the mapping $ T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ if $ Tx = x$. The set of all fixed point of $ T$ is denoted by $ { \ensuremath{\operatorname{Fix}}}T$. The function $ f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is said to be * proper * if $ { \ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f=\{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}{\ensuremath{\;|\;}}f(x)<\infty\}\neq\varnothing$. The * Fenchel conjugate * of the affair $ f$ is the function $ f^*$ which is defined by $ f^*(u)=\sup_{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}}({\langle{{u},{x}}\rangle}-f(x))$. The subdifferential of a proper function $ | of $A$ is the mapping $J_A=(A+{\ensmremath{\operatorncne{Id}}})^{-1}$. Wx say tgat $A$ is a linear relation if ${\ensurelarh{\opeeatorname{gra}}}A$ is a lindar subspwce of ${\ebsurtmath{\mathcal H}}\timxa {\ensurciath{\jwthccl H}}$. $A$ is said tp be a maxhmally monotona uiuear relation if $A$ is both maximally monotome and a linear telatpog. Ths mapping $T: {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to {\snsuremeth{\mathcal H}}$ is said to be *firmly nonexpajsivf* if $$(\forall x\in {\enduremath{\matycal Y}})(\forall y\in {\dnsuremath{\mathcal H}}) \quzd \|Tx-Ty\|^2 + \|({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Kd}}}-T)x-({\eusuremath{\opgxqtogtame{Id}}}-T)y\|^2 \lew \|x-y\|^2.$$ Jbviously, if $T$ is fismly nomexpansive, thek it ms *ninexpansive*, that is, [Lmpschitz continuous]{} rith consdaut $1$, where a Lipschitz cintinoous kappkbg ditg ronatant $P$ ia a mappinf $T:{\ensuremarh{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensurekaey{\mathcal H}}$ sudh thae $$(\sorall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\it {\ehsuremath{\mathcal H}}) \quad \|Tx-Ty\|\leq L\|x-y\|.$$ The mapplng $T$ is faid to be a *Banach contraction* if it is Lipschits convivuobw witf clnstant $L<1$. The point $x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is aaod to be a fixed point of tne mskping $T:{\ensuremxth{\matkdam H}}\to{\ensuremath{\matjcal H}}$ yf $Tx=z$. The set of sll fixed points of $T$ is deboted by ${\enslremqth{\operatorname{Fix}}}C$. The functiun $f:{\gnsurekath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremach{\,\left]-\jnfty,+\infty\rlght]}}$ is szkd to be *proper* kf ${\vnsusemath{\optfatorname{dom}}}f=\{x\in{\egsuremath{\natheal H}}{\ensjremsth{\;|\;}}f(x)<\igfty\}\neq\varjothikc$. The *Fenchel conjkgate* ox the funchion $f$ is the function $f^*$ which mx defined by $f^*(g)=\sui_{x\in{\ensurzmath{\msthcal H}}}({\langlq{{u},{x}}\rangle}-f(x))$. Thg subdiffzrentixl of a prkper fuiction $ | of $A$ is the mapping $J_A=(A+{\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}})^{-1}$. We $A$ a linear if ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{gra}}}A$ is H}}\times H}}$. $A$ is to be a monotone linear relation if $A$ is maximally monotone and a linear relation. The mapping $T: {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ said to be *firmly nonexpansive* if $$(\forall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}) \|Tx-Ty\|^2 \|({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)x-({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)y\|^2 \|x-y\|^2.$$ if $T$ is firmly nonexpansive, then it is *nonexpansive*, that is, [Lipschitz continuous]{} with constant $1$, a Lipschitz continuous mapping with constant $L$ is mapping $T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ that $$(\forall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall {\ensuremath{\mathcal \quad \|Tx-Ty\|\leq The $T$ said to be *Banach contraction* if it is Lipschitz continuous with constant $L<1$. The point $x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ is said to a fixed the mapping H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal if The set of points of $T$ is denoted by $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is said to be *proper* if H}}{\ensuremath{\;|\;}}f(x)<\infty\}\neq\varnothing$. The conjugate* of the function $f$ is function $f^*$ which is defined by $f^*(u)=\sup_{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}}({\langle{{u},{x}}\rangle}-f(x))$. subdifferential of a proper function $ | of $A$ is the mapping $J_A=(A+{\ensuremAth{\operatoRname{id}}})^{-1}$. WE saY tHat $A$ Is a lInear relation iF ${\EnsuRemath{\operatorname{gra}}}A$ Is a liNeAR subSPaCe of ${\eNsuremaTH{\mATHcaL H}}\TiMes {\EnSUrEmath{\MatHcal H}}$. $A$ iS said to be a MaxImAlly monotone LInEar relatioN if $a$ is both maximAllY monotOnE anD A lineAr rElatiOn. The mAPping $T: {\EnsurematH{\mAThcal H}}\TO {\ensureMATh{\MathCal H}}$ is said to be *firMLy NOnexpansive* if $$(\fOrall x\In {\ENsUREmaTh{\mAthcal H}})(\forAlL y\in {\eNSurematH{\MaTHCAl H}}) \QUad \|Tx-Ty\|^2 + \|({\ensureMath{\operatoRNamE{Id}}}-T)x-({\eNsUreMAth{\opeRatorNaME{Id}}}-t)y\|^2 \leq \|x-y\|^2.$$ ObviOuslY, if $T$ is firMly nonEXpansivE, Then it iS *nonexPanSivE*, thaT Is, [liPscHiTZ coNTiNuoUS]{} wiTh constaNt $1$, WhEre a LIpscHITZ ContInuOus mAppinG with constant $l$ is A mapPIng $t:{\ensuRematH{\matHcAl H}}\to{\EnsureMath{\mAtHcal H}}$ such that $$(\foRall X\in {\ensureMatH{\mAthCaL H}})(\forALl y\in {\eNsuRemAth{\mathCal H}}) \quaD \|tx-TY\|\lEQ l\|X-y\|.$$ the mapping $T$ is said tO bE A *baNach contRactioN* If It IS LipschiTz ConTinuOUS with ConsTAnT $L<1$. The poiNt $x\in{\eNSuReMath{\matHcAl H}}$ is sAiD to Be a Fixed POint Of the mApping $T:{\eNsureMAth{\mathcal H}}\to{\eNSuremath{\mathcAL H}}$ IF $tx=X$. the sEt oF all fixed poInts OF $T$ is DenoTEd By ${\eNSuremAth{\opErAToRName{Fix}}}T$. The function $F:{\eNsuremAth{\maThcal H}}\to{\ensurEmath{\,\left]-\iNFTY,+\infty\riGht]}}$ iS SaID to be *proper* if ${\eNsureMath{\operatORname{dom}}}F=\{x\in{\eNsurematH{\mathcal H}}{\ENSuremath{\;|\;}}F(x)<\iNftY\}\neQ\vaRNOtHing$. The *FencheL COnjuGaTe* of the FunCtion $f$ iS thE fuNctIon $F^*$ wHich is defIned by $f^*(u)=\SuP_{x\In{\EnSurEmath{\MAthcal H}}}({\lAnGle{{U},{x}}\RanGle}-f(x))$. tHe subdIfferEntiAl Of A ProPer funcTIoN $ | of $A$ is the mapping $J_ A=(A+{\ens urema th{ \op er ator name {Id}}})^{-1}$. We s ay that $A$ is a linea r rel at i on i f $ {\ens uremath { \o p e rat or na me{ gr a }} }A$ i s a linear subspaceof${ \ensuremath{ \ ma thcal H}}\ tim es {\ensurem ath {\math ca l H } }$. $ A$is sa id tob e a ma ximally m on o tone l i near re l a ti on i f $A$ is both max i ma l ly monotone an d a li ne a rr e lat ion . The mapp in g $T: {\ensur e ma t h { \ma t hcal H}}\to { \ensuremath { \ma thcalH} }$i s said to b e* fir mly nonexpa nsiv e* if $$( \foral l x\in { \ ensurem ath{\m ath cal H}} ) (\ fo ral ly \in {\ ens u rem ath{\mat hc al H}}) \qu a d \ |Tx- Ty\ |^2+ \|( {\ensuremath{ \op erat o rna me{Id }}}-T )x-( {\ ensur emath{ \oper at orname{Id}}}-T) y\|^ 2 \leq \| x-y \| ^2. $$ Obvi o usly,if$T$ is fir mly non e xpa ns i v e ,then it is *nonexp an s i ve *, thatis, [L i ps ch i tz conti nu ous ]{}w i th co nsta n t$1$, whe re a L i ps ch itz con ti nuousma ppi ngwithc onst ant $L $ is a m appin g $T:{\ensurema t h{\mathcal H} } \t o { \e n sure mat h{\mathcalH}}$ such tha t $ $(\ f orall x\in { \ en s uremath{\mathcal H} }) (\fora ll y\ in {\ensurema th{\mathca l H }}) \qua d \| T x- T y\|\leq L\|x-y \|.$$ The mappi n g $T$ is said to be a *Banachc o ntractio n*ifitisL i ps chitz continu o u s wi th consta nt$L<1$.The po int $x \i n{\ensure math{\ma th ca lH} }$is sa i d to beafix ed po int o f the m appin g $T :{ \e n sur emath{\ m at h c al H }} \t o{\e nsu re math{ \mat h cal H}}$ i f $Tx=x$. Th e set o fall fix ed points of$T $ is denot ed by ${\en s u remath{\ operatorname{Fix}}}T$.T he func tio n $f: {\en suremath{ \ma thcalH}} \ to{\en surema th{\, \l eft ] - \inft y , +\ inf ty \right]}}$ i s s aid t obe * proper* if ${\ensuremath{ \ ope ratorname{dom }}} f=\{ x \ in {\e n su r ema th { \ma t h cal H}}{\ensure math{\;|\; }} f (x )<\infty\} \ neq \v arnothi ng$. Th e *Fe n chel co njugate*of the fu nc tion $ f$is the fun ction $f ^*$ which is de f in ed by $f ^*(u)= \s up_ {x\in {\ensu r ema th{\m athcal H }}}({\ langl e{ {u},{x}} \rangle}-f(x))$. The su bdiffe renti alof a prop erf unc tion $ | of_$A$ is_the mapping $J_A=(A+{\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}})^{-1}$. We_say that_$A$_is a_linear_relation if ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{gra}}}A$_is a linear_subspace of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\times_{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$. $A$_is_said to be a maximally monotone linear relation if $A$ is both maximally monotone_and_a linear_relation._The_mapping $T: {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to {\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}$ is said to be_*firmly nonexpansive*_if $$(\forall x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})_\quad_\|Tx-Ty\|^2 + \|({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)x-({\ensuremath{\operatorname{Id}}}-T)y\|^2_\leq \|x-y\|^2.$$ Obviously, if $T$ is firmly nonexpansive, then_it is *nonexpansive*, that is, [Lipschitz_continuous]{} with constant_$1$,_where_a Lipschitz continuous mapping_with constant $L$ is a mapping_$T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ such that $$(\forall_x\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}})(\forall y\in {\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}) \quad_\|Tx-Ty\|\leq L\|x-y\|.$$ The mapping $T$ is_said to be a *Banach_contraction* if_it is Lipschitz continuous with_constant $L<1$. The_point $x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}$ is said_to be a fixed point of_the mapping $T:{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}\to{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ if $Tx=x$. The set_of_all fixed points_of_$T$_is denoted_by ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{Fix}}}T$. The_function_$f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$_is_said to be *proper* if ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f=\{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}{\ensuremath{\;|\;}}f(x)<\infty\}\neq\varnothing$._The *Fenchel conjugate* of the function $f$_is the function $f^*$_which_is defined by $f^*(u)=\sup_{x\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}}({\langle{{u},{x}}\rangle}-f(x))$. The subdifferential of a_proper function $ |
band represents the systematic uncertainty.[]{data-label="step"}](step.png){width="10cm"}
Moreover, sharp peaks in the energy dependence of the ratios $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ and $\Lambda/\pi$ were found for Pb+Pb collisions by the NA49 collaboration. Figure \[horn\] shows a comparison of the new measurements by NA61/SHINE for inelastic p+p interactions with the world data. Candidates of charged decays of Lambda hyperons were identified by the standard topological cuts applied to pairs of positively and negatively charged particles detected by the TPCs [@Aduszkiewicz:2015dmr; @Stroebele:2016]. One observes that even in p+p interactions the $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ ratio exhibits rapid changes with energy whereas new measurements of the $\Lambda/\pi$ ratio were done only for two energies and do not give a clear picture of the energy dependence.
Fluctuation observables: search for the critical point {#fluc}
======================================================
The strategy of looking for the critical point (CP) of strongly interacting matter is based on the expectation that the correlation length $\xi$ diverges at the CP. This divergence may lead to the growth of fluctuations for different observables such as multiplicity, net charge etc. Therefore, one can expect that a scan over freezeout points close to the CP will show non-monotonic behavior of these fluctuation observables.
This search is complicated by the fact that the size of the system created in collisions of two nuclei changes significantly from event to event. Observables can be classified according to their dependence on this volume and its fluctuations: 1) extensive quantity - proportional to the system volume in the Grand Canonical Ensemble or the number of the wounded nucleons in the Wounded Nucleon Model [@Bialas:1976ed] 2) intensive quantity - independent of the system volume 3) strongly intensive quantity [@Gorenstein:2011vq] - independent of the system volume and fluctuations of this volume. Strongly intensive quantities are best suited to study fluctuations in nucleus-nucleus collisions because of the unavoidable event-to-event variations of the volume.
Scaled variance of multiplicity {#scvar}
-------------------------------
The most common way to characterize the strength of fluctuations of the quantity $A$ is to determine the variance of its distribution $Var\left(A\right)$ which is an extensive quantity. In turn, the scaled variance $$\omega[A] | band represents the systematic uncertainty.[]{data - label="step"}](step.png){width="10 cm " }
Moreover, acute acme in the energy dependence of the ratios $ K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ and $ \Lambda/\pi$ were establish for Pb+Pb collisions by the NA49 collaboration. Figure \[horn\ ] show a comparison of the modern measurements by NA61 / SHINE for inelastic p+p interaction with the world data. candidate of charged decays of Lambda hyperon were identified by the standard topological cuts applied to pairs of positively and negatively charged particles detected by the TPCs [ @Aduszkiewicz:2015dmr; @Stroebele:2016 ]. One observe that even in p+p interactions the $ K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ ratio exhibits rapid change with energy whereas new measurements of the $ \Lambda/\pi$ ratio were make only for two energies and do not give a clear picture of the department of energy dependence.
Fluctuation observables: search for the critical point { # fluc }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The strategy of looking for the critical point (CP) of strongly interact topic is establish on the expectation that the correlation length $ \xi$ diverges at the CP. This divergence may lead to the growth of fluctuations for unlike observables such as multiplicity, final charge etc. Therefore, one can have a bun in the oven that a scan over freezeout period close to the CP will show non - monotonic demeanor of these fluctuation observables.
This search is complicate by the fact that the size of the system created in collision of two nuclei changes significantly from event to event. Observables can be classified accord to their dependence on this volume and its fluctuations: 1) extensive measure - proportional to the system book in the Grand Canonical Ensemble or the numeral of the wounded nucleons in the Wounded Nucleon Model [ @Bialas:1976ed ] 2) intensive quantity - independent of the arrangement volume 3) strongly intensive quantity [ @Gorenstein:2011vq ] - mugwump of the system volume and fluctuations of this volume. powerfully intensive quantities are best suited to study fluctuations in core - nucleus collisions because of the ineluctable event - to - event variations of the volume.
scale variance of multiplicity { # scvar }
-------------------------------
The most common way to qualify the strength of fluctuations of the quantity $ A$ is to decide the variance of its distribution $ Var\left(A\right)$ which is an extensive quantity. In turn, the scaled discrepancy $ $ \omega[A ] | bajd represents the systemxtic uncertainti.[]{dqta-labxl="step"}](sfep.png){wiath="10cm"}
Moreover, sharp peaks in tye entggy dependence of the ratios $K^{+}/\ii^{+}$ and $\Lanbda/\ki$ were found for Pb+Pb collisiohd by vhe NA49 collaborstion. Figuse \[horn\] shows a cum'arison of the new measurements by NW61/SHINE gog inelastic p+p inttrastiohs with the world data. Candidates kf charjed decays of Lsmbda hyperons were identivied by the standard tlpological xuts qpplied to pxirs of positively and negatively charged particles ddtectzd by the TKEw [@Adkvzkiewicz:2015dmc; @Strovbele:2016]. One obscgves thdt even in p+p interacbions thw $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ ratio exhibits capid changes with egergy whesecs new measurements od rhe $\Ldmbdd/\pi$ fqtiu wtre dkne onpy hor two enedgies and di not give a clear kicelte of the ensrgy dqpqndence.
Fluctuation observables: search fmr fhe critical point {#fluc}
======================================================
Rhe strategy of lookijg for thq critical point (CP) of strongly interacting mattes is uared ok thd edpectation that the correlation length $\xi$ divqdgts st the CP. This divergence mwy jead to the gtowth oy fmuctuations for divferent obseevables stch ss multiplicity, net charge wtc. Thereforv, onw can expect that c scan over yreezeput ppints close to the CP wnll shkw non-monotlnic behabkor of these fluztusthon observables.
This search is complmcateb by the facj that ehe size ov the system created in follidimns of two nuclei changes significantly fcpm event to gvett. Mbservabjes csn be classifyed according jo their bependdnce on thps volume and its fltctuations: 1) efjensive quantmty - propjrtiinal to the rystem volume on the Grcud Canonixal Ensemble or thc numcsr of the woundzb bucleons in the Wojndqd Nncleog Model [@Bialas:1976ad] 2) kntdmsive quantiuv - lnddpencent of the system vmlums 3) strongly intensovc quantiti [@Gorensteyn:2011vq] - indepencent of the system voluke end flictoations of this volume. Strongly intensivf qmantities are besb suyted to stbdy fluctuations in nucleus-nucleus colliwions because of jhe unavoidable event-jo-eyent variatipns os the volgme.
Scaled variance od multiplicity {#scyar}
-------------------------------
The most common way to chdractfrize the strength of fluctuations of the quantity $A$ is to determine the carianre of its disfribition $Vcr\lzft(A\rigrt)$ wiirh is an extensivv quantity. In turn, the scaled vaciance $$\omeca[C] | band represents the systematic uncertainty.[]{data-label="step"}](step.png){width="10cm"} Moreover, sharp the dependence of ratios $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ and collisions the NA49 collaboration. \[horn\] shows a of the new measurements by NA61/SHINE inelastic p+p interactions with the world data. Candidates of charged decays of Lambda were identified by the standard topological cuts applied to pairs of positively and charged detected the [@Aduszkiewicz:2015dmr; @Stroebele:2016]. One observes that even in p+p interactions the $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ ratio exhibits rapid changes with whereas new measurements of the $\Lambda/\pi$ ratio were only for two energies do not give a clear of energy dependence. observables: for critical point {#fluc} The strategy of looking for the critical point (CP) of strongly interacting matter is based on the that the $\xi$ diverges the This may lead to of fluctuations for different observables such charge etc. Therefore, one can expect that a over freezeout close to the CP will show behavior of these fluctuation observables. This search is by the fact that the size of the system created in collisions of two nuclei from event to event. can be classified to dependence this and its 1) extensive quantity - proportional to the system volume in the Canonical Ensemble or the number of the wounded nucleons in Nucleon [@Bialas:1976ed] 2) intensive - independent of the volume strongly intensive quantity [@Gorenstein:2011vq] of system of volume. intensive quantities are best to study fluctuations in nucleus-nucleus because of the unavoidable Scaled variance of multiplicity {#scvar} ------------------------------- The most way to characterize the strength of fluctuations the quantity $A$ is to determine the variance of its distribution $Var\left(A\right)$ is an In turn, the scaled variance $$\omega[A] | band represents the systematIc uncertaiNty.[]{daTa-lAbeL="sTep"}](sTep.pNg){width="10cm"}
MoreoVEr, shArp peaks in the energy depEndenCe OF the RAtIos $K^{+}/\pI^{+}$ and $\LamBDa/\PI$ WerE fOuNd fOr pB+PB collIsiOns by thE NA49 collaboRatIoN. Figure \[horn\] sHOwS a comparisOn oF the new measuRemEnts by nA61/sHIne for iNelAstic P+p inteRActionS with the wOrLD data. CANdidateS OF cHargEd decays of Lambda hYPeROns were identifIed by tHe STaNDArd TopOlogical cuTs AppliED to pairS Of POSItiVEly and negativEly charged pARtiCles deTeCteD By the TpCs [@AdUsZKieWicz:2015dmr; @StroEbelE:2016]. One obserVes thaT Even in p+P InteracTions tHe $K^{+}/\Pi^{+}$ rAtio EXhIbIts RaPId cHAnGes WIth Energy whErEaS new mEasuREMENts oF thE $\LamBda/\pi$ Ratio were done OnlY for TWo eNergiEs and Do noT gIve a cLear piCture Of The energy dependEnce.
fluctuatiOn oBsErvAbLes: seARch for The CriTical poInt {#fluc}
======================================================
tHe sTrATEGy Of looking for the criTiCAL pOint (CP) of StrongLY iNtERacting mAtTer Is baSED on thE expECtAtion thaT the coRReLaTion lenGtH $\xi$ divErGes At tHe CP. THIs diVergenCe may leaD to thE Growth of fluctuATions for diffeREnT OBsERvabLes Such as multiPlicITy, neT chaRGe Etc. tHerefOre, onE cAN eXPect that a scan over frEeZeout pOints Close to the CP wIll show non-MONOtonic beHaviOR oF These fluctuatiOn obsErvables.
ThIS search iS compLicated bY the fact tHAT the size Of tHe sYstEm cREAtEd in collisionS OF two NuClei chaNgeS signifIcaNtlY frOm eVeNt to event. observabLeS cAn Be ClaSsifiED accordiNg To tHeIr dEpendENce on tHis voLume AnD iTS flUctuatiONs: 1) EXTensIvE qUantIty - PrOportIonaL To tHe systeM volume in The gRand caNoNical EnSemble or the nuMbEr of the wouNdEd nUcleonS IN the WounDed Nucleon Model [@Bialas:1976ed] 2) INtensivE quAntitY - indEpendent oF thE systeM voLUme 3) strOngly iNtensIvE quANTity [@GOREnSteIn:2011Vq] - independENT of The syStEm voLume and Fluctuations of this VOluMe. Strongly intEnsIve qUANtItiES aRE beSt SUitED To study fluctuatIons in nuclEuS-NuCleus colliSIonS bEcause oF the unaVoidaBLe event-To-event vaRiations oF tHe voLUMe.
SCaled variaNce of mulTiplicity {#SCvar}
-------------------------------
THE mOst coMmoN way to ChAraCteriZe the sTRenGth of FluctuAtIons of The quAnTity $A$ is tO determine the variance of Its disTribuTioN $Var\left(A\RigHT)$ whIch is an exTensIve quantitY. In TurN, the sCalED variAnce $$\OMeGa[A] | band represents the syste matic unce rtain ty. []{ da ta-l abel ="step"}](step . png) {width="10cm"}
Moreov er, s ha r p pe a ks in t he ener g yd e pen de nc e o ft he rati os$K^{+}/ \pi^{+}$ a nd$\ Lambda/\pi$w er e found fo r P b+Pb collisi ons by th eNA4 9 coll abo ratio n. Fig u re \[h orn\] sho ws a comp a rison o f th e ne w measurements by NA 6 1/SHINE for in elasti cp +p i nte rac tions with t he wo r ld data . C a n d ida t es of charged decays ofL amb da hyp er ons were i denti fi e d b y the stand ardtopologic al cut s applie d to pai rs ofpos iti vely an dneg at i vel y c har g edparticle sde tecte d by t h e TPC s [ @Adu szkie wicz:2015dmr; @S troe b ele :2016 ]. On e ob se rvesthat e ven i np+p interaction s th e $K^{+}/ \pi ^{ +}$ r atioe xhibit s r api d chang es with ene rg y w he reas new measureme nt s of the $\L ambda/ \ pi $r atio wer edon e on l y fortwoe ne rgies an d do n o tgi ve a cl ea r pict ur e o f t he en e rgydepend ence.
F luctu a tion observabl e s: search for th e cr i tica l p oint {#fluc }
== = ==== ==== = == === = ===== ===== == = == = =================== =
The s trate gy of looking for the c r i t ical poi nt ( C P) of strongly in terac ting matte r is base d onthe expe ctation t h a t the co rre lat ion le n g th $\xi$ diverg e s atth e CP. T his diverg enc e m aylea dto the gr owth offl uc tu at ion s for differen tobs er vab les s u ch asmulti plic it y, net charge et c . The re fo re,one c an ex pect tha t a sca n over fr eez e outpo in ts clos e to the CP w il l show non -m ono tonicb e havior o f these fluctuation obs e rvables .
Thissear ch is com pli catedbyt he fac t that thesi zeo f thes y st emcr eated in c o l lis ionsof two nuclei changes significa n tly from event t o e vent . Ob ser v ab l esca n be c lassified accor ding to th ei r d ependenceo n t hi s volum e and i ts fl u ctuatio ns: 1) ex tensive q ua ntit y - p roportiona l to the system v o lumei nthe G ran d Cano ni cal Ense mble o r th e num ber of t he wou ndednu cleons i n the Wounded Nucleon M odel [ @Bial as: 1976ed] 2 ) i n ten sive quan tity - indepen den t o f the sy s tem v olum e 3 ) s t rongl y in t ensive qu a nt ity [ @G orenstein:2 0 1 1 vq] - in dep e ndentof t he system volumea nd fluctuation s of t his vo l ume. S trongly intens ive q u a ntitiesar e best suit ed to st ud y fluc tuatio ns innucleus - n uc l eus co llis ion s because of t h e unavo id ab l e even t-to -e vent v ariati o ns o f the volume.
Sca led v a r iance ofmulti pl icity { # scva r}
------- ----------- ------ ---- ---
The mos tcommon wa yto charact e rize thestren gth offl uctu ati ons of the q uanti ty $ A$ is to deter m i ne th ev ari ance of i ts dis tribution $Var\lef t(A \ right)$ w hic h is ane xt e n sive quant ity . Int u rn, the sc a ledv ar i ance$$\ome ga[A] | band_represents the_systematic uncertainty.[]{data-label="step"}](step.png){width="10cm"}
Moreover, sharp peaks_in the_energy_dependence of_the_ratios $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ and_$\Lambda/\pi$ were found_for Pb+Pb collisions by_the NA49 collaboration._Figure \[horn\]_shows a comparison of the new measurements by NA61/SHINE for inelastic p+p interactions with_the_world data._Candidates_of_charged decays of Lambda hyperons_were identified by the standard_topological cuts_applied to pairs of positively and negatively charged_particles_detected by the_TPCs [@Aduszkiewicz:2015dmr; @Stroebele:2016]. One observes that even in p+p interactions_the $K^{+}/\pi^{+}$ ratio exhibits rapid changes_with energy whereas_new_measurements_of the $\Lambda/\pi$ ratio_were done only for two energies_and do not give a clear_picture of the energy dependence.
Fluctuation observables: search_for the critical point {#fluc}
======================================================
The strategy_of looking for the critical_point (CP)_of strongly interacting matter is_based on the_expectation that_the correlation length_$\xi$ diverges at the CP. This_divergence may lead_to the growth of fluctuations for_different_observables such as_multiplicity,_net_charge etc._Therefore, one can_expect_that a_scan_over freezeout points close to the_CP_will show non-monotonic behavior of these fluctuation_observables.
This search is complicated_by_the fact that the_size of the system created_in collisions of two nuclei changes_significantly from_event to_event. Observables can be classified according to their dependence on this_volume and its fluctuations: 1) extensive_quantity - proportional to_the system_volume_in the Grand_Canonical_Ensemble or_the number of the wounded nucleons in_the Wounded_Nucleon Model [@Bialas:1976ed] 2) intensive quantity -_independent of the system_volume_3) strongly intensive quantity [@Gorenstein:2011vq] - independent_of the system volume and fluctuations_of this volume. Strongly intensive_quantities_are_best suited to study fluctuations_in nucleus-nucleus collisions because of the_unavoidable event-to-event variations_of the volume.
Scaled variance of multiplicity {#scvar}
-------------------------------
The_most_common way to characterize the strength_of_fluctuations of the quantity $A$ is_to_determine_the variance of its distribution_$Var\left(A\right)$ which is an extensive quantity._In turn, the scaled variance $$\omega[A] |
,7$ and $\theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$, which is the fourth row;
- $n=4$, $q=3,5, 7,9$ and $x\in{{\mathcal O}}_1^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$. This case is considered in the last row, as, up to rack isomorphism, this class is represented by an element in an $F$-stable maximal torus with associated partition ${\boldsymbol{1}}$.
- $n$ twice an odd number, $x\in{{\mathcal O}}_\nu^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$, which is the fifth row.
Assume now $\lambda={\boldsymbol{1}}$. Then, by Lemma \[lem:Tw\] the only classes that could occur in the table are those for $q=3,5$, or for $n=3$ and $q=7,13$, or else $n=4$ and $q\equiv 3(4)$, or $q=9$. This gives the sixth and the seventh row.
Twisted classes of elements with trivial $\theta$-semisimple part {#sec:unipotent}
=================================================================
Recall that for $x\in{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)$ there is a unique decomposition $x=us$ with $u$ unipotent, $s$ a $\theta$-semisimple element and $us=s\theta(u)$. Then we have the rack inclusions, see : $${{\mathcal O}}_x^{\theta,{\boldsymbol{G}}}\supset{{\mathcal O}}_u^{{\boldsymbol{G}}_{\theta}(s)}.$$
Assume $s=\pi(s')$, $s'\in \Tt$. According to [@steinberg-endo 8.1], ${{\mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$ is a connected reductive group. By [@mohr-tesis Theorem 1.1, Proposition 3.1], any simple component of ${{\mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$ is isomorphic either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$ or to $\SL_a({\Bbbk})$, $a\in{{\mathbb N}}$, if $n$ is even; and either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$, $\SL_a({\Bbbk})$ or $SO_{2a+1}({\Bbbk})$, $a\in {{\mathbb N}}$, if $n$ is odd. Taking $F$-invariants and | , 7 $ and $ \theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$, which is the fourth row;
- $ n=4 $, $ q=3,5, 7,9 $ and $ x\in{{\mathcal O}}_1^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$. This case is considered in the last rowing, as, up to scud isomorphism, this class is represented by an element in an $ F$-stable maximal torus with consort partition $ { \boldsymbol{1}}$.
- $ n$ twice an odd issue, $ x\in{{\mathcal O}}_\nu^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$, which is the fifth course.
Assume now $ \lambda={\boldsymbol{1}}$. Then, by Lemma \[lem: Tw\ ] the only classes that could happen in the table are those for $ q=3,5 $, or for $ n=3 $ and $ q=7,13 $, or else $ n=4 $ and $ q\equiv 3(4)$, or $ q=9$. This gives the sixth and the seventh row.
Twisted class of elements with trivial $ \theta$-semisimple part { # sec: unipotent }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Recall that for $ x\in{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)$ there is a alone decomposition $ x = us$ with $ u$ unipotent, $ s$ a $ \theta$-semisimple element and $ us = s\theta(u)$. Then we consume the rack inclusions, see: $ $ { { \mathcal O}}_x^{\theta,{\boldsymbol{G}}}\supset{{\mathcal O}}_u^{{\boldsymbol{G}}_{\theta}(s)}.$$
Assume $ s=\pi(s')$, $ s'\in \Tt$. harmonize to [ @steinberg - endo 8.1 ], $ { { \mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$ is a connected reductive group. By [ @mohr - tesis Theorem 1.1, Proposition 3.1 ], any simple component of $ { { \mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$ is isomorphic either to $ Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$ or to $ \SL_a({\Bbbk})$, $ a\in{{\mathbb N}}$, if $ n$ is even; and either to $ Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$, $ \SL_a({\Bbbk})$ or $ SO_{2a+1}({\Bbbk})$, $ a\in { { \mathbb N}}$, if $ n$ is odd. consume $ F$-invariants and | ,7$ anf $\theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$, which is tme fourth row;
- $u=4$, $q=3,5, 7,9$ anv $x\in{{\mafhcal O}}_1^{\tfeta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$. This cese us cobsidered in the last ruw, as, up no rack iwomocphism, this class is repvzsentsf by en element in ak $F$-stable mdximal torus whtf cssociated partition ${\boldsymbol{1}}$.
- $n$ ewice am ldd number, $x\in{{\iathbaj O}}_\nh^{\nhtta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$, which is the fifth gow.
Assume now $\lamnda={\boldsymbol{1}}$. Then, by Lemmw \[lel:Tw\] the only classfs that couod osxur in the txble are those for $q=3,5$, ot for $n=3$ and $q=7,13$, or else $n=4$ and $q\equkv 3(4)$, ox $q=9$. This gicew tjg sixth and vhe senenth row.
Twisbvd clasves of rlements with briviel $\tyeta$-semisimple part {#sxc:unipotent}
=================================================================
Recall thwt for $x\it{\o'eratorname{PGL}}_n(q)$ therw us a oniqua dezimpusiuioi $x=hs$ witj $u$ unipotent, $s$ a $\theta$-swmisimple element amd $lx=s\theta(u)$. Theh we hwvq the rack inclusions, see : $${{\mathcal O}}_x^{\thtta,{\bomdsymbol{G}}}\supset{{\mathcal I}}_u^{{\boldsymbol{G}}_{\theta}(s)}.$$
Asdume $s=\pi(s')$, $s'\in \Tt$. According to [@steinberg-endo 8.1], ${{\mathbb G}}_{\theta}(v')$ is e zonucgted eefuctive group. By [@mohr-tesis Theorem 1.1, Propositijh 3.1], aky simple componcnt of ${{\mathbb G}}_{\theya}(d')$ of isomorphic gither ck $Ap_{2a}({\Bbbk})$ or to $\SL_a({\Bhbk})$, $a\in{{\iathbv N}}$, if $n$ ys efen; and either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$, $\SO_a({\Bbbk})$ or $SO_{2c+1}({\Bbvk})$, $a\in {{\mathbb N}}$, if $n$ is odd. Tcking $G$-invatiants and | ,7$ and $\theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$, which is the - $q=3,5, 7,9$ $x\in{{\mathcal O}}_1^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$. This last as, up to isomorphism, this class represented by an element in an maximal torus with associated partition ${\boldsymbol{1}}$. - $n$ twice an odd number, $x\in{{\mathcal which is the fifth row. Assume now $\lambda={\boldsymbol{1}}$. Then, by Lemma \[lem:Tw\] the classes could in table are those for $q=3,5$, or for $n=3$ and $q=7,13$, or else $n=4$ and $q\equiv 3(4)$, $q=9$. This gives the sixth and the seventh Twisted classes of elements trivial $\theta$-semisimple part {#sec:unipotent} ================================================================= that $x\in{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)$ there a decomposition with $u$ unipotent, a $\theta$-semisimple element and $us=s\theta(u)$. Then we have the rack inclusions, see : $${{\mathcal O}}_x^{\theta,{\boldsymbol{G}}}\supset{{\mathcal O}}_u^{{\boldsymbol{G}}_{\theta}(s)}.$$ Assume $s'\in \Tt$. [@steinberg-endo 8.1], G}}_{\theta}(s')$ a reductive group. By 1.1, Proposition 3.1], any simple component is isomorphic either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$ or to $\SL_a({\Bbbk})$, N}}$, if is even; and either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$, or $SO_{2a+1}({\Bbbk})$, $a\in {{\mathbb N}}$, if $n$ is Taking $F$-invariants and | ,7$ and $\theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$, which is the foUrth row;
- $n=4$, $q=3,5, 7,9$ aNd $x\in{{\MatHcaL O}}_1^{\ThetA,{\opeRatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$. tHis cAse is considered in the laSt row, As, UP to rACk IsomoRphism, tHIs CLAss Is RePreSeNTeD by an EleMent in aN $F$-stable maXimAl Torus with assOCiAted partitIon ${\Boldsymbol{1}}$.
- $n$ tWicE an odd NuMbeR, $X\in{{\maThcAl O}}_\nu^{\Theta,{\oPEratorName{PGL}}_n(q)}$, WhICh is thE Fifth roW.
aSsUme nOw $\lambda={\boldsymboL{1}}$. thEN, by Lemma \[lem:Tw\] tHe only ClASsES ThaT coUld occur in ThE tablE Are thosE FoR $Q=3,5$, OR foR $N=3$ and $q=7,13$, or else $n=4$ aNd $q\equiv 3(4)$, or $q=9$. tHis Gives tHe SixTH and thE seveNtH Row.
twisted clasSes oF elements With trIVial $\theTA$-semisiMple paRt {#sEc:uNipoTEnT}
=================================================================
REcaLl THat FOr $X\in{\OPerAtorname{pGl}}_n(Q)$ therE is a UNIQUe deComPosiTion $x=Us$ with $u$ unipotEnt, $S$ a $\thETa$-sEmisiMple eLemeNt And $us=S\theta(U)$. Then We Have the rack inclUsioNs, see : $${{\mathCal o}}_x^{\TheTa,{\BoldsYMbol{G}}}\sUpsEt{{\mAthcal O}}_U^{{\boldsyMBol{g}}_{\tHETA}(s)}.$$
assume $s=\pi(s')$, $s'\in \Tt$. AccOrDINg To [@steinbErg-endO 8.1], ${{\MaThBB G}}_{\theta}(s')$ Is A coNnecTED reduCtivE GrOup. By [@mohR-tesis tHeOrEm 1.1, PropoSiTion 3.1], anY sImpLe cOmponENt of ${{\Mathbb g}}_{\theta}(s')$ iS isomORphic either to $SP_{2A}({\Bbbk})$ or to $\SL_a({\BBBk})$, $A\IN{{\mAThbb n}}$, if $N$ is even; and eItheR To $Sp_{2A}({\BbbK})$, $\sL_A({\BbBK})$ or $SO_{2A+1}({\Bbbk})$, $A\iN {{\MaTHbb N}}$, if $n$ is odd. Taking $F$-InVarianTs and | ,7$ and $\theta(x)\neq x^{ -1}$, whic h isthe fo ur th r ow;
- $n=4$, $q = 3,5, 7,9$ and $x\in{{\math cal O }} _ 1^{\ t he ta,{\ operato r na m e {PG L} }_ n(q )} $ .Thiscas e is co nsidered i n t he last row, a s ,up to rack is omorphism, t his class i s r e prese nte d byan ele m ent in an $F$-s ta b le max i mal tor u s w ithassociated partit i on ${\boldsymbol{ 1}}$.
- $ n $ t wic e an odd n um ber,$ x\in{{\ m at h c a l O } }_\nu^{\theta ,{\operator n ame {PGL}} _n (q) } $, whi ch is t h e f ifth row.
Assu me now $\ lambda = {\bolds y mbol{1} }$. Th en, by Lem m a\[ lem :T w \]t he on l y c lasses t ha tcould occ u r i n th e t able arethose for $q= 3,5 $, o r fo r $n= 3$ an d $q =7 ,13$, or el se $n =4 $ and $q\equiv3(4) $, or $q= 9$. T his g ivest he six thand the se venth r o w.
T w i s te d classes of eleme nt s wi th trivi al $\t h et a$ - semisimp le pa rt { # s ec:un ipot e nt }
====== ====== = == == ======= == ====== == === === ===== = ==== ====== ======== =
Re c all that for $ x \in{\operator n am e { PG L }}_n (q) $ there isa un i quedeco m po sit i on $x =us$wi t h$ u$ unipotent, $s$ a $ \theta $-sem isimple eleme nt and $us = s \ theta(u) $. T h en we have the ra ck in clusions,s ee : $${ {\mat hcal O}} _x^{\thet a , {\boldsy mbo l{G }}} \su p s et {{\mathcal O} } _ u^{{ \b oldsymb ol{ G}}_{\t het a}( s)} .$$
Assume $s =\pi(s') $, $ s' \i n \ Tt$.A ccording t o [ @s tei nberg - endo 8 .1],${{\ ma th b b G }}_{\th e ta } ( s')$ i sa co nne ct ed re duct i vegroup.By [@mohr -te s is T he or em 1.1, Proposition3. 1], any si mp lecompon e n t of ${{ \mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s' ) $ is is omo rphic eit her to $S p_{ 2a}({\ Bbb k })$ or to $\ SL_a( {\ Bbb k } )$, $ a \ in {{\ ma thbb N}}$, i f $ n$ is e ven; and ei ther to $Sp_{2a}({ \ Bbb k})$, $\SL_a( {\B bbk} ) $ o r $ S O_ { 2a+ 1} ( {\B b b k})$, $a\in {{\ mathbb N}} $, if $n$ is od d . T ak ing $F$ -invari antsa nd | ,7$ and_$\theta(x)\neq x^{-1}$,_which is the fourth_row;
- __$n=4$, $q=3,5,_7,9$_and $x\in{{\mathcal O}}_1^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$._This case is_considered in the last_row, as, up_to_rack isomorphism, this class is represented by an element in an $F$-stable maximal torus_with_associated partition_${\boldsymbol{1}}$.
-__ $n$ twice an odd_number, $x\in{{\mathcal O}}_\nu^{\theta,{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)}$, which is_the fifth_row.
Assume now $\lambda={\boldsymbol{1}}$. Then, by Lemma \[lem:Tw\] the_only_classes that could_occur in the table are those for $q=3,5$, or_for $n=3$ and $q=7,13$, or else_$n=4$ and $q\equiv_3(4)$,_or_$q=9$. This gives the_sixth and the seventh row.
Twisted classes_of elements with trivial $\theta$-semisimple part_{#sec:unipotent}
=================================================================
Recall that for $x\in{\operatorname{PGL}}_n(q)$ there is a_unique decomposition $x=us$ with $u$ unipotent,_$s$ a $\theta$-semisimple element and_$us=s\theta(u)$. Then_we have the rack inclusions,_see : $${{\mathcal_O}}_x^{\theta,{\boldsymbol{G}}}\supset{{\mathcal O}}_u^{{\boldsymbol{G}}_{\theta}(s)}.$$
Assume_$s=\pi(s')$, $s'\in \Tt$._According to [@steinberg-endo 8.1], ${{\mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$_is a connected_reductive group. By [@mohr-tesis Theorem 1.1,_Proposition_3.1], any simple_component_of_${{\mathbb G}}_{\theta}(s')$_is isomorphic either_to_$Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$ or_to_$\SL_a({\Bbbk})$, $a\in{{\mathbb N}}$, if $n$ is_even;_and either to $Sp_{2a}({\Bbbk})$, $\SL_a({\Bbbk})$ or $SO_{2a+1}({\Bbbk})$,_$a\in {{\mathbb N}}$, if_$n$_is odd. Taking $F$-invariants_and |
a minimalist phenomenological model, finding a good agreement.'
address:
- 'Departamento de Física, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brazil'
- 'National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems, CNPq, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil'
author:
- 'H.V. Ribeiro'
- 'R.S. Mendes'
- 'E.K. Lenzi'
- 'M.P. Belancon'
- 'L.C. Malacarne'
title: On the dynamics of bubbles in boiling water
---
Introduction
============
Bubbles are ubiquitous in nature and their dynamics is both fascinating and very complex[@Prosperetti; @Lohse]. It is not surprising that bubbles are an effervescent source of research. For instance, bubbles appear in the context of energy generation[@Joshi; @Alvarez], collapsing bubbles can emit ligth[@Brenner], turbulent thermal convection has been observed in a single soap bubble[@Seychelles], cooperative and avalanches-like dynamics are present in collapsing of aqueous foams[@Vandewalle; @Ritacco], and singularities emerge when air bubbles detache from a nozzle submerged in water[@Schmidt].
Despite the fact that the fundamental equations ruling the behavior of moving fluids are well known, an analytical or even a numerical approach can become infeasible for many common situations. This is particularly true for bubbles in turbulent fluids, where, at higher Reynolds numbers, the number of mesh points required to solve each bubble as well as the flow around it grows up leading to a long simulation time[@Tryggvason].
A very familiar case, where bubbles appears in such contexts, is the boiling process of water[@Zahn]. For exemple, when the temperature reaches 100$^\circ$C the vapor pressure is 1 bar and we can observe the spontaneous process of bubble formation (nucleation)[@BrennerC]. Although it is an ordinary process, nucleate boiling has several complex aspects involving thermal interactions between bubbles and the heated surface and among the nucleation sites. There are also hydrodynamics interactions bubble to bubble and bubble to liquid bulk[@Shoji]. In this scenario, simple models, whether phenomenological or not, and | a minimalist phenomenological model, finding a good agreement.'
address:
-' Departamento de Física, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020 - 900, Maringá, PR, Brazil'
-' National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems, CNPq, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290 - 180, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil'
writer:
-' H.V. Ribeiro'
-' R.S. Mendes'
-' E.K. Lenzi'
-' M.P. Belancon'
-' L.C. Malacarne'
claim: On the dynamics of bubbles in boiling water
---
insertion
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Bubbles are ubiquitous in nature and their moral force is both fascinating and very complex[@Prosperetti; @Lohse ]. It is not surprising that bubbles are an effervescent source of inquiry. For case, bubbles look in the context of energy generation[@Joshi; @Alvarez ], collapsing bubbles can emit ligth[@Brenner ], disruptive thermal convection has been observed in a single soap bubble[@Seychelles ], cooperative and avalanches - like moral force are present in collapsing of aqueous foams[@Vandewalle; @Ritacco ], and singularities emerge when atmosphere bubbles detache from a nozzle submerge in water[@Schmidt ].
Despite the fact that the fundamental equation ruling the behavior of moving fluids are well known, an analytical or even a numeric approach can become infeasible for many common situations. This is particularly true for bubbles in turbulent fluids, where, at higher Reynolds numbers, the number of mesh points required to solve each bubble equally well as the stream around it grows up lead to a retentive simulation time[@Tryggvason ].
A very familiar case, where bubble appears in such contexts, is the boiling process of water[@Zahn ]. For exemple, when the temperature reaches 100$^\circ$C the vaporization pressure is 1 bar and we can observe the spontaneous process of bubble formation (nucleation)[@BrennerC ]. Although it is an ordinary process, nucleate boiling has several complex aspect involve thermal interactions between bubbles and the heated surface and among the nucleation sites. There are besides hydrodynamics interactions bubble to bubble and bubble to liquid bulk[@Shoji ]. In this scenario, simple models, whether phenomenological or not, and | a linimalist phenomenologigal model, findiny a goov agreejent.'
addrdss:
- 'Departamento de Física, Unmverwidadt Estadual de Marineá, Av. Cololbo 5790, 87020-900, Maeingá, PR, Brazil'
- 'Iztional Instifmte oy Wcience and Teghnology fos Complex Systamr, ENPq, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180, Rio de Janeyro, RJ, Nrwzil'
author:
- 'H.V. Tibeigo'
- 'R.S. Jvnbes'
- 'E.K. Lenzi'
- 'M.P. Belancon'
- 'L.C. Malzcarne'
tptle: On the dynamocs of bubbles in boiling aateg
---
Introduction
============
Bubblfs are ubiqojtotw in nature xnd their dynamics is goth fascinating and very compldx[@Proxperetti; @Lihwe]. Lj is not sur'risind that bubblcx are dn effetvescent sourcc of ceseqrch. For instance, bubules appear in the cjntext of euergy generation[@Joshi; @Aovaree], colnapskbg cubglxs dan emlt migth[@Brennsr], turbulenr thermal convectiom rqs been obserbed in a single soap bubble[@Seychelles], cooperatine ahd avalanches-like dynamucs are present in coplapsing jf aqueous foams[@Vandewalle; @Ritacco], and singularithes ejdrgt qhen xur bubbles detache from a nozzle submerged in wwfet[@Sbhmidt].
Despite the fact that yhf gondamental equxtions ruming the behavior lf movigg flyids are rell known, an analytical or eveb a numericaj approach can becole infeasibue fpr mamy common situations. Thns is larticularlj true fod bubbles in turbjlekt xluids, where, at higher Reygolds numuers, che numbdr og mesh points reeuired to solve each bubhle ad fell as thf flow around it grows up leadiij to a long somglanion time[@Cryggvsson].
A very faiiliar case, whgre bubblzs appdars in subh contexvs, is the boyling process lf water[@Zahn]. For exeiple, wheb the tdoperature reacnes 100$^\circ$C the vapor pressure is 1 bar end ds can observe tkt skobtaneous procexs uf fuhbke xormation (nuwleagiov)[@NrenndrC]. Althougm ig is an ordinary process, nucmeate boiling has xeyeral comklex aspests involving thermal interactilns bxtween bubbkes and the heated surface and amkng the nkclcation sites. Eherc arg also hydrpdynamics interactions bubble to bubble and bubble to liqyid bulk[@Shoji]. In thns scenario, smmple iodels, whather phenomenologicql or not, and | a minimalist phenomenological model, finding a good - de Física, Estadual de Maringá, PR, - 'National Institute Science and Technology Complex Systems, CNPq, Rua Xavier Sigaud 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil' author: - 'H.V. Ribeiro' - 'R.S. Mendes' 'E.K. Lenzi' - 'M.P. Belancon' - 'L.C. Malacarne' title: On the dynamics of in water Introduction Bubbles are ubiquitous in nature and their dynamics is both fascinating and very complex[@Prosperetti; @Lohse]. It not surprising that bubbles are an effervescent source research. For instance, bubbles in the context of energy @Alvarez], bubbles can ligth[@Brenner], thermal has been observed a single soap bubble[@Seychelles], cooperative and avalanches-like dynamics are present in collapsing of aqueous foams[@Vandewalle; @Ritacco], and emerge when detache from nozzle in Despite the fact fundamental equations ruling the behavior of well known, an analytical or even a numerical can become for many common situations. This is true for bubbles in turbulent fluids, where, at Reynolds numbers, the number of mesh points required to solve each bubble as well as around it grows up to a long time[@Tryggvason]. very case, bubbles appears such contexts, is the boiling process of water[@Zahn]. For exemple, when temperature reaches 100$^\circ$C the vapor pressure is 1 bar and observe spontaneous process of formation (nucleation)[@BrennerC]. Although it an process, nucleate boiling has aspects thermal and heated and among the nucleation There are also hydrodynamics interactions to bubble and bubble scenario, simple models, whether phenomenological or not, and | a minimalist phenomenologicAl model, finDing a GooD agReEmenT.'
addRess:
- 'DepartamenTO de FÍsica, Universidade EstadUal de maRIngá, aV. COlombO 5790, 87020-900, MaringÁ, pR, bRAziL'
- 'NAtIonAl iNsTitutE of science And TechnolOgy FoR Complex SystEMs, cNPq, Rua XavIer sigaud 150, 22290-180, Rio de JAneIro, RJ, BRaZil'
AUthor:
- 'h.V. RIbeirO'
- 'R.S. MenDEs'
- 'E.K. LeNzi'
- 'M.P. BelaNcON'
- 'L.C. MalACarne'
tiTLE: ON the Dynamics of bubbles IN bOIling water
---
IntrOductiOn
============
bUbBLEs aRe uBiquitous iN nAture ANd their DYnAMICs iS Both fascinatiNg and very coMPleX[@ProspErEttI; @lohse]. IT is noT sURprIsing that buBbleS are an effErvescENt sourcE Of reseaRch. For InsTanCe, buBBlEs AppEaR In tHE cOntEXt oF energy gEnErAtion[@joshI; @aLVArez], ColLapsIng buBbles can emit lIgtH[@BreNNer], TurbuLent tHermAl ConveCtion hAs beeN oBserved in a singlE soaP bubble[@SeYchElLes], CoOperaTIve and AvaLanChes-likE dynamiCS arE pRESEnT in collapsing of aquEoUS FoAms[@VandeWalle; @RITaCcO], And singuLaRitIes eMERge whEn aiR BuBbles detAche frOM a NoZzle subMeRged in WaTer[@schMidt].
DESpitE the faCt that thE fundAMental equationS Ruling the behaVIoR OF mOVing FluIds are well kNown, AN anaLytiCAl Or eVEn a nuMericAl APpROach can become infeasIbLe for mAny coMmon situationS. This is parTICUlarly trUe foR BuBBles in turbulenT fluiDs, where, at hIGher ReynOlds nUmbers, thE number of MESh points ReqUirEd tO soLVE eAch bubble as weLL As thE fLow arouNd iT grows uP leAdiNg tO a lOnG simulatiOn time[@TrYgGvAsOn].
a veRy famILiar case, WhEre BuBblEs appEArs in sUch coNtexTs, Is THe bOiling pROcESS of wAtEr[@zahn]. for ExEmple, When THe tEmperatUre reacheS 100$^\ciRC$C thE vApOr pressUre is 1 bar and we CaN observe thE sPonTaneouS PRocess of Bubble formation (nucleatiON)[@BrenneRC]. ALthouGh it Is an ordinAry ProcesS, nuCLeate bOiling Has seVeRal COMplex ASPeCts InVolving theRMAl iNteraCtIons Between Bubbles and the heateD SurFace and among tHe nUcleATIoN siTEs. tHerE aRE alSO Hydrodynamics inTeractions BuBBlE to bubble aND buBbLe to liqUid bulk[@shoji]. iN this scEnario, simPle models, WhEtheR PHenOmenologicAl or not, aNd | a minimalist phenomenolog ical model , fin din g a g oodagre ement.'
addres s :
-'Departamento de Físic a, Un iv e rsid a de Esta dual de Ma r i ngá ,Av . C ol o mb o 579 0,87020-9 00, Maring á,PR , Brazil'
-' Na tional Ins tit ute of Scien ceand Te ch nol o gy fo r C omple x Syst e ms, CN Pq, Rua X av i er Sig a ud 150, 2 22 90-1 80, Rio de Janeir o ,R J, Brazil'
aut hor:
- ' H .V . Rib eir o'
- 'R.S. M endes '
- 'E.K . L e n z i'- 'M.P. Belanc on'
- 'L.C. Mal acarne 'tit l e: Onthe d yn a mic s of bubble s in boilingwater- --
Int r oductio n
==== === === ==
B ub bl esar e ub i qu ito u s i n nature a nd thei r dy n a m i cs i s b othfasci nating and ve rycomp l ex[ @Pros peret ti;@L ohse] . It i s not s urprising thatbubb les are a n e ff erv es cents ourceofres earch.For ins t anc e, b u bb les appear in theco n t ex t of ene rgy ge n er at i on[@Josh i; @A lvar e z ], co llap s in g bubble s cane mi tligth[@ Br enner] ,tur bul ent t h erma l conv ection h as be e n observed ina single soapb ub b l e[ @ Seyc hel les], coope rati v e an d av a la nch e s-lik e dyn am i cs are present in coll ap sing o f aqu eous foams[@V andewalle; @ R itacco], and si n gularities eme rge w hen air bu b bles det achefrom a n ozzle sub m e rged inwat er[ @Sc hmi d t ].
Despite the f actth at thefun damenta l e qua tio nsru ling thebehavior o fmo vi ngfluid s are wel lkno wn , a n ana l ytical or e venanu m eri cal app r oa c h can b ec omeinf ea sible for man y commo n situati ons . Thi sis partic ularly true f or bubbles i ntur bulent f luids, w here, at higher Reynold s number s,the n umbe r of mesh po ints r equ i red to solve each b ubb l e as w e l lasth e flow aro u n d i t gro ws upleading to a long simulat i ontime[@Tryggva son ].
A ve ryf am i lia rc ase , where bubbles a ppears insu c hcontexts,i s t he boilin g proce ss of water[@ Zahn]. Fo r exemple ,when t hetemperatur e reache s 100$^\c i rc$Ct he vapo r p ressur eis1 bar and w e ca n obs erve t he spont aneou sprocessof bubble formation (nu cleati on)[@ Bre nnerC]. A lth o ugh it is an ord inary proc ess , n uclea teb oilin g ha s s eve r al co mple x aspectsi nv olv i n gthermal int e r a cti ons b etw e en bub bles and the heated s u rface and amon g th e nuc lea t ionsi tes. There are al so h ydrodyna mi cs interact ions bub bl e to b ubbleand bu bble to l iq u id bul k[@S hoj i]. In th issc e nario,si mp l e mode ls,wh etherphenom e nolo g i cal or not, and | a_minimalist phenomenological_model, finding a good_agreement.'
address:
- 'Departamento_de_Física, Universidade_Estadual_de Maringá, Av._Colombo 5790, 87020-900,_Maringá, PR, Brazil'
- 'National_Institute of Science_and_Technology for Complex Systems, CNPq, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, RJ,_Brazil'
author:
-_'H.V. Ribeiro'
-_'R.S._Mendes'
-_'E.K. Lenzi'
- 'M.P. Belancon'
- 'L.C._Malacarne'
title: On the dynamics of_bubbles in_boiling water
---
Introduction
============
Bubbles are ubiquitous in nature and their_dynamics_is both fascinating_and very complex[@Prosperetti; @Lohse]. It is not surprising that_bubbles are an effervescent source of_research. For instance,_bubbles_appear_in the context of_energy generation[@Joshi; @Alvarez], collapsing bubbles can_emit ligth[@Brenner], turbulent thermal convection has_been observed in a single soap bubble[@Seychelles],_cooperative and avalanches-like dynamics are present_in collapsing of aqueous foams[@Vandewalle;_@Ritacco], and_singularities emerge when air bubbles_detache from a_nozzle submerged_in water[@Schmidt].
Despite the_fact that the fundamental equations ruling_the behavior of_moving fluids are well known, an_analytical_or even a_numerical_approach_can become_infeasible for many_common_situations. This_is_particularly true for bubbles in turbulent_fluids,_where, at higher Reynolds numbers, the number_of mesh points required_to_solve each bubble as_well as the flow around_it grows up leading to a_long simulation_time[@Tryggvason].
A very_familiar case, where bubbles appears in such contexts, is the boiling_process of water[@Zahn]. For exemple, when_the temperature reaches 100$^\circ$C_the vapor_pressure_is 1 bar_and_we can_observe the spontaneous process of bubble formation_(nucleation)[@BrennerC]. Although_it is an ordinary process, nucleate_boiling has several complex_aspects_involving thermal interactions between bubbles and_the heated surface and among the_nucleation sites. There are also_hydrodynamics_interactions_bubble to bubble and bubble_to liquid bulk[@Shoji]. In this scenario,_simple models, whether_phenomenological or not, and |
{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} \nonumber\\
& \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}} \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \forall k.\end{aligned}$$
The positive semi-definite constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) means that the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side should be non-negative. Note that the term $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of rank one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which is $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all other eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can be further converted into the constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf | { I}_{N_t } - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2 } } \mathbf{h}_{Pk } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } \nonumber\\
& \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2 } } \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t }, \forall k.\end{aligned}$$
The positive semi - definite constraint in (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) means that the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left - bridge player slope should be non - negative. Note that the term $ \left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $ \mathbf{h}_{Pk } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of social station one. It has only one positivist eigenvalue, which is $ \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1 } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all early eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) can be further convert into the constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left - hand side of (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) as $ $ 1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf | {I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\bin(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\ngq k} \bar{\nambda}_n \mathbf{f}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \mathbf{i}_{Pk} \nathbd{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} \nonuober\\
& \quwd\qquad+\sym_{j\ntq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mefhbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{g}_{Ij}^H\biy)^{-\fcac{H}{2}} \succeq \matmbf{0}_{N_t}, \foraln k.\end{aligned}$$
Tve plsitive semi-definite constraint in (\[Q:semi-degijite\]) means thaj the iinijal eigenvalue of the matrix in ths left-hend side should be non-negative. Note that hhe herm $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \var{\lwnbda}_j \mathbf{f}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Kj}^K\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\jathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{V_t} +\suk_{j\neq k} \bat{\lzmhga}_j \mathbf{h}_{'j}\mathff{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\fvsc{H}{2}}$ is of ranl one. It has okly oie pisitive eigenvalue, whmch is $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\lefj(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sbm_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mqtybf{h}_{Pb}\matvbf{h}_{Oh}^H\rkghu)^{-1} \methgf{h}_{Pk}$, wnd all other eigenvaluew are zeros. Therefote, nne constrainf in (\[E:feii-definite\]) can be further converted intm tge constraint on the mibimal eigenvalue of tje matrix in the left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1 - \frac{\bdr{\lamudx}_k}{\gcnma_k}\mxrhhf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathfr | {I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber\\ \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k} \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}} \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, constraint (\[E:semi-definite\]) means that minimal eigenvalue of matrix in the left-hand side should non-negative. Note that the term $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of rank one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} k} \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} and all other eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can be further converted into constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix the left-hand side of as $$1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq \bar{\lambda}_j | {I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\biG(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\Sum_{j\nEq k} \Bar{\LaMbda}_J \matHbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{PJ}^h\big)^{-\Frac{1}{2}} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^h\big(\mAtHBf{I}_{N_T} \NoNumbeR\\
& \quad\qqUAd+\SUM_{j\nEq K} \bAr{\lAmBDa}_J \mathBf{h}_{pj}\mathbF{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frAc{H}{2}} \SuCceq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \FOrAll k.\end{aliGneD}$$
The positive SemI-definItE coNStraiNt iN (\[E:semI-definITe\]) meanS that the mInIMal eigENvalue oF THe MatrIx in the left-hand siDE sHOuld be non-negatIve. NotE tHAt THE teRm $\lEft(\mathbf{I}_{n_t} +\Sum_{j\nEQ k} \bar{\laMBdA}_J \MAthBF{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^h\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mAThbF{h}_{Pk} \maThBf{h}_{pK}^H\left(\MathbF{I}_{n_T} +\suM_{j\neq k} \bar{\laMbda}_J \mathbf{h}_{PJ}\mathbF{H}_{Pj}^H\rigHT)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ iS of ranK onE. It Has oNLy OnE poSiTIve EIgEnvALue, Which is $\mAtHbF{h}_{Pk}^H\Left(\MATHBf{I}_{N_T} +\suM_{j\neQ k} \bar{\Lambda}_j \mathbf{H}_{Pj}\MathBF{h}_{PJ}^H\rigHt)^{-1} \matHbf{h}_{pk}$, And alL other EigenVaLues are zeros. TheRefoRe, the consTraInT in (\[e:sEmi-deFInite\]) cAn bE fuRther coNverted INto ThE CONsTraint on the minimal EiGENvAlue of thE matriX In ThE Left-hand SiDe oF (\[E:seMI-DefinIte\]) aS $$1 - \FrAc{\bar{\lamBda}_k}{\gaMMa_K}\mAthbf{h}_{PK}^H\Left(\maThBf{I}_{n_t} +\sUm_{j\neQ K} \bar{\Lambda}_J \mathbf | {I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\la mbda}_k}{\ gamma _k} \bi g( \mat hbf{ I}_{N_t} +\sum _ {j\n eq k} \bar{\lambda}_j\math bf { h}_{ P j} \math bf{h}_{ P j} ^ H \bi g) ^{ -\f ra c {1 }{2}} \ mathbf{ h}_{Pk} \m ath bf {h}_{Pk}^H\b i g( \mathbf{I} _{N _t} \nonumbe r\\
& \ qu ad\ q quad+ \su m_{j\ neq k} \bar{\ lambda}_j \ m athbf{ h }_{Pj}\ m a th bf{h }_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\ f ra c {H}{2}} \succe q \mat hb f {0 } _ {N_ t}, \forall k .\ end{a l igned}$ $
T h e po s itive semi-de finite cons t rai nt in(\ [E: s emi-de finit e\ ] ) m eans that t he m inimal ei genval u e of th e matrix in th e l eft -han d s id e s ho u ldb enon - neg ative. N ot ethatthet e r m $\l eft (\ma thbf{ I}_{N_t} +\su m_{ j\ne q k} \bar {\lam bda} _j \mat hbf{h} _{Pj} \m athbf{h}_{Pj}^H \rig ht)^{-\fr ac{ 1} {2} }$ $\ma t hbf{h} _{P k}\mathbf {h}_{Pk } ^H\ le f t ( \m athbf{I}_{N_t} +\s um _ { j\ neq k} \ bar{\l a mb da } _j \math bf {h} _{Pj } \ mathb f{h} _ {P j}^H\rig ht)^{- \ fr ac {H}{2}} $is ofra nkone . Ith as o nly on e positi ve ei g envalue, which is $\mathbf{h } _{ P k }^ H \lef t(\ mathbf{I}_{ N_t} +\su m_{j \ ne q k } \bar {\lam bd a }_ j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\ma th bf{h}_ {Pj}^ H\right)^{-1} \mathbf{h } _ { Pk}$, an d al l o t her eigenvalue s are zeros. Th e refore,the c onstrain t in (\[E : s emi-defi nit e\] ) c anb e f urther conver t e d in to the co nst raint o n t hemin ima leigenvalu e of the m at ri xinthe l e ft-handsi deof (\ [E:se m i-defi nite\ ]) a s$$ 1 -\frac{\ b ar { \ lamb da }_ k}{\ gam ma _k}\m athb f {h} _{Pk}^H \left(\ma thb f {I}_ {N _t } +\sum _{j\neq k} \b ar {\lambda}_ j\ma thbf | {I}_{N_t} -_\frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} _\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_\nonumber\\
_ &_\quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}}_\succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \forall_k.\end{aligned}$$
The positive semi-definite constraint_in (\[E:semi-definite\]) means_that_the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side should be non-negative. Note_that_the term_$\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_+\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_+\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is_of rank_one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which_is_$\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k}_\bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all other eigenvalues are zeros._Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can_be further converted_into_the_constraint on the minimal_eigenvalue of the matrix in the_left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1_- \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf |
has $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)+1$ terms, where $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is the size of the orbit of $\w_j$.
An efficient way to find the decompositions is to work with products of Weyl group orbits, rather than with orbit functions. Their decomposition has been studied, and many examples have been described in [@HLP]. It is useful to be aware of the congruence class of each product, because all of the orbits in its decomposition necessarily belong to that class. The *congruence number* $\#$ of an orbit $\lambda$ of $A_n$, which is also the congruence number of the orbit functions $C_\lambda$ and $S_\lambda$, specifies the class. It is calculated as follows, $$\begin{gathered}
\#(C_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\#(S_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^n ka_k\mod (n+1).\end{gathered}$$ In particular, each $X_j$, where $j=1,2,\dots,n$, is in its own congruence class. During the multiplication, congruence numbers add up $\mod n+1$.
Polynomials in two and three variables originating from orbit functions of the simple Lie algebras $A_2$, $C_2$, $G_2$, $A_3$, $B_3$, and $C_3$ are obtained in the forthcoming paper [@NesterenkoPatera2009].
Exponential substitution
------------------------
There is another approach to multivariate orthogonal polynomials, which is also based on orbit functions. Such polynomials can be constructed by the continuous and invertible change of variables $$\begin{gathered}
\label{subst_exp}
y_j=e^{2\pi i x_j}, \quad x_j\in\R,\quad j=1,2,\dots,n.\end{gathered}$$ Consider an $A_n$ orbit function $C_\lambda(x)$, $S_\lambda(x)$ or $E_\lambda(x)$, when $\lambda$ is given in the $\w$-basis and $x$ is given in the $\alpha$-basis. Each | has $ \left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)+1 $ terms, where $ \left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is the size of the orbit of $ \w_j$.
An efficient way to witness the decomposition is to work with products of Weyl group orbits, quite than with orbit functions. Their decay has been studied, and many examples have been described in [ @HLP ]. It is utilitarian to be mindful of the congruence class of each intersection, because all of the orbits in its decomposition necessarily belong to to that class. The * congruence numeral * $ \#$ of an orbit $ \lambda$ of $ A_n$, which is also the congruity number of the orbit functions $ C_\lambda$ and $ S_\lambda$, specify the class. It is calculated as follow, $ $ \begin{gathered }
\#(C_{(a_1,a_2,\dots, a_n)}(x))=\#(S_{(a_1,a_2,\dots, a_n)}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^n ka_k\mod (n+1).\end{gathered}$$ In finical, each $ X_j$, where $ j=1,2,\dots, n$, is in its own congruence course. During the multiplication, congruence numbers add up $ \mod n+1$.
polynomial in two and three variables originating from orbit functions of the simple Lie algebras $ A_2 $, $ C_2 $, $ G_2 $, $ A_3 $, $ B_3 $, and $ C_3 $ are obtained in the forthcoming paper [ @NesterenkoPatera2009 ].
Exponential substitution
------------------------
There is another approach to multivariate orthogonal polynomials, which is also based on orbit functions. Such polynomial can be construct by the continuous and invertible change of variable $ $ \begin{gathered }
\label{subst_exp }
y_j = e^{2\pi i x_j }, \quad x_j\in\R,\quad j=1,2,\dots, n.\end{gathered}$$ think an $ A_n$ orbit function $ C_\lambda(x)$, $ S_\lambda(x)$ or $ E_\lambda(x)$, when $ \lambda$ is given in the $ \w$-basis and $ x$ is give in the $ \alpha$-basis. Each | had $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ m\\\end{smallmatrix}\rntht)+1$ tecms, whede $\left(\bdgin{smallmatrix}n+1\\j\\\end{smallmatcix}\rught)$ us the size of the orbkt of $\w_j$.
Aj efficiwnt xay to find the vscomposlcions ls to xork with produgts of Weyl group orbits, saghzr than with orbit functions. Their dqcomposotlon has been sjudiec, and many examples have been described in [@HLP]. It is useful to be aware of the congrufnce class of each profuct, becausg alj of the orbigs in its decompositioh necessarily belong to that clxss. Tke *congruenxe nulter* $\#$ of an irbit $\lambda$ of $A_k$, which is alsp the congruenge nukbee of the orbit functimns $C_\lambda$ and $S_\lwmbda$, spewiyies the class. It is xaoculajed av fouoowr, $$\btgii{gafhered}
\#(F_{(a_1,a_2,\vots,a_n)}(x))=\#(S_{(a_1,a_2,\dkts,a_n)}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^n ka_k\mod (n+1).\end{gatherec}$$ Yb particular, sach $X_t$, rhere $j=1,2,\dots,n$, is in its own congruence cnasa. During the multiplicarion, congruence numbets add up $\iod n+1$.
Polynomials in two and three variables origitatinj wron jfvih functions of the simple Lie algebras $A_2$, $C_2$, $G_2$, $W_3$, $B_3$, akd $C_3$ are obtaineb in the forthcokijg kaper [@NesterenkuPaterc2009].
Sxlonential substituhion
------------------------
Thete is qnother akproavh to multivariate orthogonql polynomiajw, which is also baded on orbic funcjions. Xuch polynomials can be conatructed by the contjvuous and invertkblv chdnge of variables $$\begin{gatrered}
\labeo{subxt_exp}
y_j=d^{2\pi o x_j}, \qtad x_j\in\R,\qkad j=1,2,\dots,n.\end{gathered}$$ Cojsidet an $A_t$ orbit fujction $C_\lambda(x)$, $S_\lambda(x)$ or $E_\lambda(x)$, when $\lamndd$ iv given nn the $\w$-basis and $x$ is given in tke $\alpha$-yasis. Dach | has $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)+1$ terms, where $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is of orbit of An efficient way to with products of group orbits, rather with orbit functions. Their decomposition has studied, and many examples have been described in [@HLP]. It is useful to aware of the congruence class of each product, because all of the orbits its necessarily to class. The *congruence number* $\#$ of an orbit $\lambda$ of $A_n$, which is also the congruence of the orbit functions $C_\lambda$ and $S_\lambda$, specifies class. It is calculated follows, $$\begin{gathered} \#(C_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\#(S_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^n ka_k\mod (n+1).\end{gathered}$$ particular, $X_j$, where is its congruence class. During multiplication, congruence numbers add up $\mod n+1$. Polynomials in two and three variables originating from orbit functions the simple $A_2$, $C_2$, $A_3$, and are obtained in paper [@NesterenkoPatera2009]. Exponential substitution ------------------------ There to multivariate orthogonal polynomials, which is also based orbit functions. polynomials can be constructed by the and invertible change of variables $$\begin{gathered} \label{subst_exp} y_j=e^{2\pi x_j}, \quad x_j\in\R,\quad j=1,2,\dots,n.\end{gathered}$$ Consider an $A_n$ orbit function $C_\lambda(x)$, $S_\lambda(x)$ or $E_\lambda(x)$, when $\lambda$ in the $\w$-basis and is given in $\alpha$-basis. | has $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ j\\\End{smallmaTrix}\rIghT)+1$ teRmS, wheRe $\leFt(\begin{smallmaTRix}n+1\\J\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is The siZe OF the ORbIt of $\w_J$.
An effiCIeNT Way To FiNd tHe DEcOmposItiOns is to Work with prOduCtS of Weyl group ORbIts, rather tHan With orbit funCtiOns. TheIr DecOMposiTioN has bEen stuDIed, and Many exampLeS Have beEN descriBED iN [@HLP]. it is useful to be awaRE oF The congruence cLass of EaCH pRODucT, beCause all of ThE orbiTS in its dECoMPOSitIOn necessarily Belong to thaT ClaSs. The *cOnGruENce numBer* $\#$ of An ORbiT $\lambda$ of $A_n$, WhicH is also thE congrUEnce numBEr of the Orbit fUncTioNs $C_\lAMbDa$ And $s_\lAMbdA$, SpEciFIes The class. it Is CalcuLateD AS FOlloWs, $$\bEgin{GatheRed}
\#(C_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\#(s_{(a_1,a_2,\Dots,A_N)}(x))=\sUm_{k=1}^n kA_k\mod (N+1).\end{GaThereD}$$ In parTiculAr, Each $X_j$, where $j=1,2,\dotS,n$, is In its own cOngRuEncE cLass. DURing thE muLtiPlicatiOn, congrUEncE nUMBErS add up $\mod n+1$.
PolynomiAlS IN tWo and thrEe variABlEs ORiginatiNg FroM orbIT FunctIons OF tHe simple lie algEBrAs $a_2$, $C_2$, $G_2$, $A_3$, $B_3$, anD $C_3$ Are obtAiNed In tHe forTHcomIng papEr [@NesterEnkoPATera2009].
ExponentiaL Substitution
------------------------
THErE IS aNOtheR apProach to mulTivaRIate OrthOGoNal POlynoMials, WhICh IS also based on orbit fuNcTions. SUch poLynomials can bE constructED BY the contInuoUS aND invertible chaNge of Variables $$\bEGin{gatheRed}
\laBel{subst_Exp}
y_j=e^{2\pi i X_J}, \Quad x_j\in\r,\quAd j=1,2,\DotS,n.\eND{GaThered}$$ ConsideR AN $A_n$ oRbIt functIon $c_\lambda(X)$, $S_\lAmbDa(x)$ Or $E_\LaMbda(x)$, when $\Lambda$ is GiVeN iN tHe $\w$-Basis ANd $x$ is givEn In tHe $\AlpHa$-basIS. Each | has $\left(\begin{smallma trix}n+1\\ j\\\ end {sm al lmat rix} \right)+1$ ter m s, w here $\left(\begin{sma llmat ri x }n+1 \ \j \\\en d{small m at r i x}\ ri gh t)$ i s t he si zeof theorbit of $ \w_ j$ .
An effici e nt way to fi ndthe decompos iti ons is t o w o rk wi thprodu cts of Weyl g roup orbi ts , rathe r than w i t horbi t functions. Thei r d e composition ha s been s t ud i e d,and many exam pl es ha v e beend es c r i bed in [@HLP]. It is usefult o b e awar eoft he con gruen ce cla ss of eachprod uct, beca use al l of the orbitsin its de com posi t io nnec es s ari l ybel o ngto thatcl as s. Th e *c o n g r uenc e n umbe r* $\ #$ of an orbi t $ \lam b da$ of $ A_n$, whi ch is a lso th e con gr uence number of the orbit fu nct io ns$C _\lam b da$ an d $ S_\ lambda$ , speci f ies t h e cl ass. It is calcula te d as follows , $$\b e gi n{ g athered}
\ #(C _{(a _ 1 ,a_2, \dot s ,a _n)}(x)) =\#(S_ { (a _1 ,a_2,\d ot s,a_n) }( x)) =\s um_{k = 1}^n ka_k\ mod (n+1 ).\en d {gathered}$$ I n particular,e ac h $X _ j$,whe re $j=1,2,\ dots , n$,is i n i tso wn co ngrue nc e c l ass. During the mul ti plicat ion,congruence nu mbers addu p $\mod n+ 1$.Po l ynomials in tw o and three var i ables or igina ting fro m orbit f u n ctions o f t hesim ple L ie algebras $A_ 2 $ , $C _2 $, $G_2 $,$A_3$,$B_ 3$, an d $ C_ 3$ are ob tained i nth efo rth comin g paper [ @N est er enk oPate r a2009] .
Ex pone nt ia l su bstitut i on - ---- -- -- ---- --- -- ----- -
T h ere is ano ther appr oac h tomu lt ivariat e orthogonalpo lynomials, w hic h is a l s o basedon orbit functions. Suc h polyno mia ls ca n be construc ted by th e c o ntinuo us and inve rt ibl e chang e of va ri ables $$\b e g in{ gathe re d}
\ label{s ubst_exp}
y_j=e^{2 \ pii x_j}, \quad x_ j\in \ R ,\ qua d j = 1,2 ,\ d ots , n .\end{gathered} $$ Conside ra n$A_n$ orbi t fu nc tion $C _\lambd a(x)$ , $S_\la mbda(x)$or $E_\la mb da(x ) $ , w hen $\lamb da$ is g iven in t h e $\w $ -b asisand $x$ i sgiv en in the $ \ alp ha$-b asis.Ea ch | has_$\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\ j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)+1$_terms, where $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}n+1\\j\\\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is_the size_of_the orbit_of_$\w_j$.
An efficient way_to find the_decompositions is to work_with products of_Weyl_group orbits, rather than with orbit functions. Their decomposition has been studied, and many_examples_have been_described_in_[@HLP]. It is useful to_be aware of the congruence_class of_each product, because all of the orbits in_its_decomposition necessarily belong_to that class. The *congruence number* $\#$ of an_orbit $\lambda$ of $A_n$, which is_also the congruence_number_of_the orbit functions $C_\lambda$_and $S_\lambda$, specifies the class. It_is calculated as follows, $$\begin{gathered}
\#(C_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\#(S_{(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^n ka_k\mod_(n+1).\end{gathered}$$ In particular, each $X_j$, where $j=1,2,\dots,n$,_is in its own congruence class._During the multiplication, congruence numbers_add up_$\mod n+1$.
Polynomials in two and_three variables originating_from orbit_functions of the_simple Lie algebras $A_2$, $C_2$, $G_2$,_$A_3$, $B_3$, and_$C_3$ are obtained in the forthcoming_paper [@NesterenkoPatera2009].
Exponential_substitution
------------------------
There is another_approach_to_multivariate orthogonal_polynomials, which is_also_based on_orbit_functions. Such polynomials can be constructed_by_the continuous and invertible change of variables_$$\begin{gathered}
\label{subst_exp}
y_j=e^{2\pi i x_j}, \quad_x_j\in\R,\quad_j=1,2,\dots,n.\end{gathered}$$ Consider an $A_n$_orbit function $C_\lambda(x)$, $S_\lambda(x)$ or_$E_\lambda(x)$, when $\lambda$ is given in_the $\w$-basis_and $x$_is given in the $\alpha$-basis. Each |
have $$\overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x)) =
G^j(F^i(x) + i\ell) =
G^j(F^i(x)) + i\ell.$$ This gives (b) for $i=0,1,\dots,q-1$. The fact that $\overline{P}_q(x) = P_q(x) + q\ell$ follows from (b) for $i=0$ and from the definition of these two sets.
Suppose that $\ell$ satisfies the assumption of (c). From (b) and the choice of $\ell$, we have $$\min \Re(\overline{P}_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(\overline{P}_i(x)) =
\min \Re(P_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(P_i(x)) + \ell > 0$$ for every $i \in \{0,1,\dots,q-1\}.$ Hence (c) holds.
It is not difficult to show that, for every $\ell \in \Z$, $\operatorname{Per}(p/q,F) = \operatorname{Per}((p+q\ell)/q,F+\ell).$ Consequently, by changing the lifting and the number $p$, if necessary, we may assume that $P$ has an increasing block structure by Lemma \[sepblocks\]. Moreover, by replacing the point $x$ by $x-m$, we may also assume that the branching point of $\chull{P_0(x)}$ is 0 (that is, $m=0$). To simplify the notation, we shall omit the dependence from $x$ of the blocks $P_i(x)$ in what follows.
Let $I_1,I_2,I_3$ denote the three $P_0 \cup \{0\}$-basic intervals in $\chull{P_0}$ that have an endpoint equal to $0$ and let ${\mathcal{G}}$ be the directed graph with vertices $I_1,I_2,I_3$ such that there is an arrow $I_i {\nolinebreak[4]\longrightarrow\nolinebreak[4]}I_j$ if and only if $\chull{G(\partial
I_i)}\supset I_j$ (notice that arrows in | have $ $ \overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x) ) =
G^j(F^i(x) + i\ell) =
G^j(F^i(x) ) + i\ell.$$ This gives (b) for $ i=0,1,\dots, q-1$. The fact that $ \overline{P}_q(x) = P_q(x) + q\ell$ follows from (boron) for $ i=0 $ and from the definition of these two set.
Suppose that $ \ell$ satisfies the assumption of (speed of light). From (b) and the choice of $ \ell$, we hold $ $ \min \Re(\overline{P}_{i+1}(x) ) - \max \Re(\overline{P}_i(x) ) =
\min \Re(P_{i+1}(x) ) - \max \Re(P_i(x) ) + \ell > 0$$ for every $ i \in \{0,1,\dots, q-1\}.$ Hence (c) cargo area.
It is not difficult to show that, for every $ \ell \in \Z$, $ \operatorname{Per}(p / q, F) = \operatorname{Per}((p+q\ell)/q, F+\ell).$ Consequently, by change the lifting and the number $ p$, if necessary, we may assume that $ P$ has an increasing block structure by Lemma \[sepblocks\ ]. furthermore, by replacing the point $ x$ by $ x - m$, we may besides assume that the branching point of $ \chull{P_0(x)}$ is 0 (that is, $ m=0 $). To simplify the notation, we shall omit the addiction from $ x$ of the blocks $ P_i(x)$ in what follow.
Let $ I_1,I_2,I_3 $ denote the three $ P_0 \cup \{0\}$-basic intervals in $ \chull{P_0}$ that own an endpoint equal to $ 0 $ and let $ { \mathcal{G}}$ be the directed graph with vertices $ I_1,I_2,I_3 $ such that there is an arrow $ I_i { \nolinebreak[4]\longrightarrow\nolinebreak[4]}I_j$ if and merely if $ \chull{G(\partial
I_i)}\supset I_j$ (notice that arrows in | hage $$\overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x)) =
G^j(F^i(x) + i\ell) =
G^j(Y^u(x)) + i\enl.$$ Thia gives (c) for $i=0,1,\dots,q-1$. The fact that $\oterlune{P}_q(z) = P_q(x) + q\ell$ follows ffom (b) for $i=0$ and feom uhe definition of these two seta.
Duppmwe that $\ell$ sajisfies the dssumption of (w). Wrlm (b) and the choice of $\ell$, we have $$\iin \Re(\ofegline{P}_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Te(\oveglyne{P}_j(q)) =
\nin \Re(P_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(P_i(x)) + \ell > 0$$ fkr everj $i \in \{0,1,\dots,q-1\}.$ Hencr (c) holds.
It is not difficupt tl show that, for evfry $\ell \in \E$, $\opqeatorname{Per}(o/q,F) = \operauoxname{Per}((p+q\eml)/q,F+\ell).$ Consequently, by changine the lifting abd thf number $p$, ih necefsary, we may assume dhat $P$ nas an increaslng bnocj structure by Lemma \[sxpblocks\]. Moreover, by replacinc che point $x$ by $x-m$, we nat alsm asvume rhag tge bdanchijg 'oint of $\chhll{P_0(x)}$ is 0 (tyat is, $m=0$). To simplifu eye notation, ws shalj jmit the dependence from $x$ of the blockv $P_j(x)$ in what follows.
Let $I_1,U_2,I_3$ denote the three $P_0 \cup \{0\}$-basis intervals in $\chull{P_0}$ that have an endpoint equal to $0$ ena ltt ${\mathzql{H}}$ be the directed graph with vertices $I_1,I_2,I_3$ sucr tnan there is an arrjw $I_i {\nolinrbgesh[4]\longrightarruw\noliusbdeak[4]}I_j$ if and only if $\chujl{G(\paetial
I_i)}\sukset O_j$ (notice that arrows in | have $$\overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x)) = G^j(F^i(x) + i\ell) = i\ell.$$ gives (b) $i=0,1,\dots,q-1$. The fact q\ell$ from (b) for and from the of these two sets. Suppose that satisfies the assumption of (c). From (b) and the choice of $\ell$, we $$\min \Re(\overline{P}_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(\overline{P}_i(x)) = \min \Re(P_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(P_i(x)) + \ell 0$$ every \in Hence (c) holds. It is not difficult to show that, for every $\ell \in \Z$, $\operatorname{Per}(p/q,F) \operatorname{Per}((p+q\ell)/q,F+\ell).$ Consequently, by changing the lifting and the $p$, if necessary, we assume that $P$ has an block by Lemma Moreover, replacing point $x$ by we may also assume that the branching point of $\chull{P_0(x)}$ is 0 (that is, $m=0$). To simplify notation, we the dependence $x$ the $P_i(x)$ in what $I_1,I_2,I_3$ denote the three $P_0 \cup $\chull{P_0}$ that have an endpoint equal to $0$ let ${\mathcal{G}}$ the directed graph with vertices $I_1,I_2,I_3$ that there is an arrow $I_i {\nolinebreak[4]\longrightarrow\nolinebreak[4]}I_j$ if only if $\chull{G(\partial I_i)}\supset I_j$ (notice that arrows in | have $$\overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x)) =
g^j(F^i(x) + i\ell) =
G^J(F^i(x)) + i\Ell.$$ thiS gIves (B) for $I=0,1,\dots,q-1$. The fact tHAt $\ovErline{P}_q(x) = P_q(x) + q\ell$ followS from (B) fOR $i=0$ anD FrOm the DefinitIOn OF TheSe TwO seTs.
sUpPose tHat $\Ell$ satiSfies the asSumPtIon of (c). From (b) aND tHe choice of $\Ell$, We have $$\min \Re(\oVerLine{P}_{i+1}(X)) - \mAx \RE(\OverlIne{p}_i(x)) =
\miN \Re(P_{i+1}(x)) - \MAx \Re(P_i(X)) + \ell > 0$$ for evErY $I \in \{0,1,\dotS,Q-1\}.$ Hence (c) HOLdS.
It iS not difficult to shOW tHAt, for every $\ell \iN \Z$, $\operAtORnAME{PeR}(p/q,f) = \operatornAmE{Per}((p+Q\Ell)/q,F+\elL).$ coNSEQueNTly, by changing The lifting aND thE numbeR $p$, If nECessarY, we maY aSSumE that $P$ has an IncrEasing bloCk struCTure by LEMma \[sepbLocks\]. MOreOveR, by rEPlAcIng ThE PoiNT $x$ By $x-M$, We mAy also asSuMe That tHe brANCHIng pOinT of $\cHull{P_0(X)}$ is 0 (that is, $m=0$). To sImpLify THe nOtatiOn, we sHall OmIt the DependEnce fRoM $x$ of the blocks $P_i(X)$ in wHat followS.
LeT $I_1,i_2,I_3$ dEnOte thE Three $P_0 \Cup \{0\}$-BasIc interVals in $\cHUll{p_0}$ tHAT HaVe an endpoint equal tO $0$ aND LeT ${\mathcal{g}}$ be the DIrEcTEd graph wItH veRticES $i_1,I_2,I_3$ suCh thAT tHere is an Arrow $I_I {\NoLiNebreak[4]\LoNgrighTaRroW\noLinebREak[4]}I_J$ if and Only if $\chUll{G(\pARtial
I_i)}\supset I_J$ (Notice that arrOWs IN | have $$\overline{G}^j(\ov erline{F}^ i(x)) =G^j (F ^i(x ) +i\ell) =
G^j(F ^ i(x) ) + i\ell.$$ This give s (b) f o r $i = 0, 1,\do ts,q-1$ . T h e fa ct t hat $ \ ov erlin e{P }_q(x)= P_q(x) + q\ el l$ follows f r om (b) for $ i=0 $ and from t hedefini ti ono f the setwo s ets.
S uppose that $\e ll $ satis f ies the a ss umpt ion of (c). From( b) and the choice of $\ el l $, w e h ave $$\min \R e( \over l ine{P}_ { i+ 1 } ( x)) - \max \Re(\o verline{P}_ i (x) ) =
\m in \R e (P_{i+ 1}(x) )- \m ax \Re(P_i( x))+ \ell >0$$ fo r every$ i \in \ {0,1,\ dot s,q -1\} . $He nce ( c ) h o ld s.Itis not d if fi cultto s h o w that , f or e very$\ell \in \Z$ , $ \ope r ato rname {Per} (p/q ,F ) = \ operat ornam e{ Per}((p+q\ell)/ q,F+ \ell).$ C ons eq uen tl y, by changi ngthe liftin g and t h e n um b e r $ p$, if necessary,we m ay assumethat $ P $ha s an incr ea sin g bl o c k str uctu r eby Lemma \[sep b lo ck s\]. Mo re over,by re pla cingt he p oint $ x$ by $x -m$,w e may also ass u me that the b r an c h in g poi ntof $\chull{ P_0( x )}$is 0 (t hat is, $ m=0$) .T os implify the notatio n, we sh all o mit the depen dence from $ x $ of the blo c ks $P_i(x)$ in wh at fo llows.
Le t $I_1,I_ 2,I_3 $ denote the thre e $P_0 \cu p \ {0\ }$- bas i c i ntervals in $ \ c hull {P _0}$ th athave an en dpo int eq ua l to $0$and let${ \m at hc al{ G}}$b e the di re cte dgra ph wi t h vert ices$I_1 ,I _2 , I_3 $ sucht ha t ther eis anarr ow $I_i {\n o lin ebreak[ 4]\longri ght a rrow \n ol inebrea k[4]}I_j$ ifan d only if$\ chu ll{G(\ p a rtial
I_ i)}\supset I_j$ (notice that ar row s in | have_$$\overline{G}^j(\overline{F}^i(x)) =
G^j(F^i(x)_+ i\ell) =
G^j(F^i(x)) +_i\ell.$$ This_gives_(b) for_$i=0,1,\dots,q-1$._The fact that_$\overline{P}_q(x) = P_q(x)_+ q\ell$ follows from_(b) for $i=0$_and_from the definition of these two sets.
Suppose that $\ell$ satisfies the assumption of (c)._From_(b) and_the_choice_of $\ell$, we have $$\min_\Re(\overline{P}_{i+1}(x)) - \max \Re(\overline{P}_i(x)) =
\min_\Re(P_{i+1}(x)) -_\max \Re(P_i(x)) + \ell > 0$$ for every_$i_\in \{0,1,\dots,q-1\}.$ Hence_(c) holds.
It is not difficult to show that, for_every $\ell \in \Z$, $\operatorname{Per}(p/q,F) =_\operatorname{Per}((p+q\ell)/q,F+\ell).$ Consequently, by_changing_the_lifting and the number_$p$, if necessary, we may assume_that $P$ has an increasing block_structure by Lemma \[sepblocks\]. Moreover, by replacing the_point $x$ by $x-m$, we may_also assume that the branching_point of_$\chull{P_0(x)}$ is 0 (that is,_$m=0$). To simplify_the notation,_we shall omit_the dependence from $x$ of the_blocks $P_i(x)$ in_what follows.
Let $I_1,I_2,I_3$ denote the three_$P_0_\cup \{0\}$-basic intervals_in_$\chull{P_0}$_that have_an endpoint equal_to_$0$ and_let_${\mathcal{G}}$ be the directed graph with_vertices_$I_1,I_2,I_3$ such that there is an arrow_$I_i {\nolinebreak[4]\longrightarrow\nolinebreak[4]}I_j$ if and_only_if $\chull{G(\partial
I_i)}\supset I_j$ (notice_that arrows in |
that $|A' \cap Z| > m/2$ and $|Z| {\leqslant}|(B+B) \setminus [\lambda k]|$. It follows that, given $B$ such that $B = A \setminus [\lambda k / 2]$ for some $A \in {\mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$, the number of choices for $A'$ is at most $$\sum_{\ell > m/2} \binom{\mu b}{\ell}\binom{\lambda k / 2}{k - b - \ell} {\leqslant}\sum_{\ell > m/2} \left( \frac{e\mu b}{\ell} \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2} \right)^\ell {\lambda k / 2 \choose k - b} {\leqslant}2^{-m} \left( \frac{2}{\lambda - 2}\right)^b {\lambda k / 2 \choose k},$$ where the inequalities follow from and the bounds $\mu b {\leqslant}2^{-8} \lambda m$ and $\lambda {\geqslant}3$, which together imply that $$\frac{2e\mu b}{m} \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2} {\leqslant}\frac{e \lambda}{2^5(\lambda-2)} {\leqslant}\frac{1}{4}.$$ By , and recalling again that $\mu b {\leqslant}2^{-8} \lambda m$, it follows that there are at most $$e^{2\delta b} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda-2} \right)^{\mu b / 2} 2^{-m} \binom{\lambda k/2}{k} {\leqslant}2^{-m/2} \binom{\lambda k/2}{k}$$ choices for $A$ in this case, as required.
It will be useful in the next section (which deals with the case $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mu b$) to be able to assume that $\mu = \Theta(\lambda)$. The next lemma, which follows from Corollary \[cor:prob:sumset\], provides a suitable bound on the size of ${\mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$ when this is not the case.
\[lem:big:or:small:sumset\] Let $b \in {\mathbb{N}}$. If $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mu b$ and $\mu \not\in (\lambda / 2,2\ | that $ |A' \cap Z| > m/2 $ and $ |Z| { \leqslant}|(B+B) \setminus [ \lambda k]|$. It follows that, given $ B$ such that $ B = A \setminus [ \lambda k / 2]$ for some $ A \in { \mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$, the number of option for $ A'$ is at about $ $ \sum_{\ell > m/2 } \binom{\mu b}{\ell}\binom{\lambda k / 2}{k - b - \ell } { \leqslant}\sum_{\ell > m/2 } \left (\frac{e\mu b}{\ell } \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2 } \right)^\ell { \lambda k / 2 \choose k - b } { \leqslant}2^{-m } \left (\frac{2}{\lambda - 2}\right)^b { \lambda k / 2 \choose k},$$ where the inequalities follow from and the boundary $ \mu b { \leqslant}2^{-8 } \lambda m$ and $ \lambda { \geqslant}3 $, which in concert imply that $ $ \frac{2e\mu b}{m } \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2 } { \leqslant}\frac{e \lambda}{2 ^ 5(\lambda-2) } { \leqslant}\frac{1}{4}.$$ By , and recalling again that $ \mu b { \leqslant}2^{-8 } \lambda m$, it follows that there be at most $ $ e^{2\delta b } \left (\frac{\lambda}{\lambda-2 } \right)^{\mu b / 2 } 2^{-m } \binom{\lambda k/2}{k } { \leqslant}2^{-m/2 } \binom{\lambda k/2}{k}$$ choice for $ A$ in this case, as required.
It will be utilitarian in the next section (which deals with the case $ radius { \leqslant}2^{11 } \mu b$) to be able to assume that $ \mu = \Theta(\lambda)$. The next lemma, which follows from Corollary \[cor: prob: sumset\ ], provides a suitable oblige on the size of $ { \mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$ when this is not the case.
\[lem: big: or: small: sumset\ ] lease $ b \in { \mathbb{N}}$. If $ r { \leqslant}2^{11 } \mu b$ and $ \mu \not\in (\lambda / 2,2\ | thwt $|A' \cap Z| > m/2$ and $|Z| {\leqsuant}|(B+B) \setminus [\lambda k]|$. It rollows ghat, given $B$ such that $B = A \derminuw [\lambda k / 2]$ for some $X \in {\mathbal{D}}(b,\mu)$, tye nnmber of choices for $A'$ is at mkdt $$\sbm_{\xll > m/2} \binom{\mu n}{\ell}\binom{\lakbda k / 2}{k - b - \alu} {\peqslant}\sum_{\ell > m/2} \left( \frac{e\mu b}{\ell} \cdot \ftaf{2}{\lambda-2} \right)^\ejl {\lsibda k / 2 \choose k - b} {\leqslant}2^{-m} \left( \frzc{2}{\lambde - 2}\right)^b {\lambds k / 2 \choose k},$$ where the ijequwlities follow frol and the biundf $\mu b {\leqslavt}2^{-8} \lambda m$ and $\lambda {\geqslant}3$, which together imply ghat $$\yrac{2e\mu b}{m} \xdit \vtac{2}{\lambda-2} {\lewslann}\frac{e \lambda}{2^5(\lambda-2)} {\laqslant}\grac{1}{4}.$$ By , and regalliig atain that $\mu b {\leqslait}2^{-8} \lambda m$, it follors that tvexe are at most $$e^{2\delta b} \left( \fraw{\lamcea}{\lxmbsa-2} \rjght)^{\mu b / 2} 2^{-m} \binom{\lzmbda k/2}{k} {\lewslant}2^{-m/2} \binom{\lambda k/2}{h}$$ choices for $Z$ in trif case, as required.
It will be useful in uhe nsxt section (which deals with the case $r {\leqspant}2^{11} \mu b$) to be able to assume that $\mu = \Theta(\lambda)$. The neft lejoa, cmlch wilpows from Corollary \[cor:prob:sumset\], provides a stjtsbke bound on thc size of ${\mathcal{D}}(n,\mk)$ eren this is nut the caae.
\[lem:big:or:small:sumdet\] Let $b \in {\mathbb{N}}$. Yf $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mu b$ and $\mu \not\in (\lambda / 2,2\ | that $|A' \cap Z| > m/2$ and \setminus k]|$. It that, given $B$ \setminus k / 2]$ some $A \in the number of choices for $A'$ at most $$\sum_{\ell > m/2} \binom{\mu b}{\ell}\binom{\lambda k / 2}{k - b - {\leqslant}\sum_{\ell > m/2} \left( \frac{e\mu b}{\ell} \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2} \right)^\ell {\lambda k / 2 k b} \left( - 2}\right)^b {\lambda k / 2 \choose k},$$ where the inequalities follow from and the bounds b {\leqslant}2^{-8} \lambda m$ and $\lambda {\geqslant}3$, which imply that $$\frac{2e\mu b}{m} \frac{2}{\lambda-2} {\leqslant}\frac{e \lambda}{2^5(\lambda-2)} {\leqslant}\frac{1}{4}.$$ By and again that b \lambda it follows that are at most $$e^{2\delta b} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda-2} \right)^{\mu b / 2} 2^{-m} \binom{\lambda k/2}{k} {\leqslant}2^{-m/2} \binom{\lambda k/2}{k}$$ for $A$ case, as It be in the next deals with the case $r {\leqslant}2^{11} be able to assume that $\mu = \Theta(\lambda)$. next lemma, follows from Corollary \[cor:prob:sumset\], provides a bound on the size of ${\mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$ when this not the case. \[lem:big:or:small:sumset\] Let $b \in {\mathbb{N}}$. If $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mu b$ and $\mu / 2,2\ | that $|A' \cap Z| > m/2$ and $|Z| {\leqslant}|(B+B) \sEtminus [\lamBda k]|$. IT foLloWs That, GiveN $B$ such that $B = A \seTMinuS [\lambda k / 2]$ for some $A \in {\mathCal{D}}(b,\Mu)$, THe nuMBeR of chOices foR $a'$ iS AT moSt $$\SuM_{\elL > m/2} \BInOm{\mu b}{\Ell}\Binom{\laMbda k / 2}{k - b - \ell} {\LeqSlAnt}\sum_{\ell > m/2} \leFT( \fRac{e\mu b}{\ell} \CdoT \frac{2}{\lambda-2} \rIghT)^\ell {\laMbDa k / 2 \CHoose K - b} {\lEqslaNt}2^{-m} \lefT( \Frac{2}{\laMbda - 2}\right)^B {\lAMbda k / 2 \cHOose k},$$ whERE tHe inEqualities follow fROm ANd the bounds $\mu b {\LeqslaNt}2^{-8} \LAmBDA m$ aNd $\lAmbda {\geqslAnT}3$, whicH TogetheR ImPLY ThaT $$\Frac{2e\mu b}{m} \cdot \Frac{2}{\lambda-2} {\lEQslAnt}\fraC{e \LamBDa}{2^5(\lambDa-2)} {\leqSlANt}\fRac{1}{4}.$$ By , and recAlliNg again thAt $\mu b {\lEQslant}2^{-8} \lAMbda m$, it FollowS thAt tHere ARe At MosT $$e^{2\DEltA B} \lEft( \FRac{\Lambda}{\laMbDa-2} \Right)^{\Mu b / 2} 2^{-m} \BINOM{\lamBda K/2}{k} {\leQslanT}2^{-m/2} \binom{\lambda K/2}{k}$$ cHoicES foR $A$ in tHis caSe, as ReQuireD.
It wilL be usEfUl in the next sectIon (wHich deals WitH tHe cAsE $r {\leqSLant}2^{11} \mu B$) to Be aBle to asSume thaT $\Mu = \THeTA(\LAmBda)$. The next lemma, whiCh FOLlOws from COrollaRY \[cOr:PRob:sumseT\], pRovIdes A SUitabLe boUNd On the sizE of ${\matHCaL{D}}(B,\mu)$ when ThIs is noT tHe cAse.
\[Lem:biG:Or:smAll:sumSet\] Let $b \iN {\mathBB{N}}$. If $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mU B$ and $\mu \not\in (\laMBdA / 2,2\ | that $|A' \cap Z| > m/2$and $|Z| { \leqs lan t}| (B +B)\set minus [\lambda k]|$ . It follows that, giv en $B $s ucht ha t $B= A \se t mi n u s [ \l am bda k /2]$ f orsome $A \in {\mat hca l{ D}}(b,\mu)$, th e number o f c hoices for $ A'$ is at m ost $$\su m_{ \ell> m/2} \binom {\mu b}{\ el l }\bino m {\lambd a k/ 2} {k - b - \ell} {\ l eq s lant}\sum_{\el l > m/ 2} \l e f t(\fr ac{e\mu b} {\ ell}\ cdot \f r ac { 2 } {\l a mbda-2} \righ t)^\ell {\l a mbd a k /2\ch o ose k- b}{\ l eqs lant}2^{-m} \le ft( \frac {2}{\l a mbda -2 }\right )^b {\ lam bda k / 2\c hoo se k}, $ $whe r e t he inequ al it ies f ollo w f r om and the boun ds $\mu b {\l eqs lant } 2^{ -8} \ lambd a m$ a nd $\ lambda {\ge qs lant}3$, whichtoge ther impl y t ha t $ $\ frac{ 2 e\mu b }{m } \ cdot \f rac{2}{ \ lam bd a - 2 }{\leqslant}\frac{e \ l a mb da}{2^5( \lambd a -2 )} {\leqsla nt }\f rac{ 1 } {4}.$ $ By ,and reca llinga ga in that $ \m u b {\ le qsl ant }2^{- 8 } \l ambdam$, it f ollow s that there ar e at most $$e^ { 2\ d e lt a b}\le ft( \frac{\ lamb d a}{\ lamb d a- 2}\ right )^{\m ub / 2} 2^{-m} \binom{\l am bda k/ 2}{k} {\leqslant}2 ^{-m/2} \b i n o m{\lambd a k/ 2 }{ k }$$ choices fo r $A$ in this c a se, as r equir ed.
Itwill be u s e ful in t henex t s ect i o n(which dealsw i th t he case $ r { \leqsla nt} 2^{ 11} \m ub$) to be able to a ss um etha t $\m u = \Thet a( \la mb da) $. Th e nextlemma , wh ic hf oll ows fro m C o r olla ry \ [cor :pr ob :sums et\] , pr ovidesa suitabl e b o undon t he size of ${\mathca l{ D}}(b,\mu) $whe n this i s not th e case.
\[lem:big:or:s m all:sum set \] Le t $b \in {\ma thb b{N}}$ . I f $r {\ leqsla nt}2^ {1 1}\ m u b$a n d$\m u\not\in (\ l a mbd a / 2 ,2 \ | that_$|A' \cap_Z| > m/2$ and_$|Z| {\leqslant}|(B+B)_\setminus_[\lambda k]|$._It_follows that, given_$B$ such that_$B = A \setminus_[\lambda k /_2]$_for some $A \in {\mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$, the number of choices for $A'$ is at most_$$\sum_{\ell_> m/2}_\binom{\mu_b}{\ell}\binom{\lambda_k / 2}{k - b_- \ell} {\leqslant}\sum_{\ell > m/2}_\left( \frac{e\mu_b}{\ell} \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2} \right)^\ell {\lambda k / 2_\choose_k - b}_{\leqslant}2^{-m} \left( \frac{2}{\lambda - 2}\right)^b {\lambda k / 2_\choose k},$$ where the inequalities follow_from and the_bounds_$\mu_b {\leqslant}2^{-8} \lambda m$_and $\lambda {\geqslant}3$, which together imply_that $$\frac{2e\mu b}{m} \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda-2} {\leqslant}\frac{e_\lambda}{2^5(\lambda-2)} {\leqslant}\frac{1}{4}.$$ By , and recalling again that_$\mu b {\leqslant}2^{-8} \lambda m$, it_follows that there are at_most $$e^{2\delta_b} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda-2} \right)^{\mu b_/ 2} 2^{-m}_\binom{\lambda k/2}{k}_{\leqslant}2^{-m/2} \binom{\lambda k/2}{k}$$_choices for $A$ in this case,_as required.
It will_be useful in the next section_(which_deals with the_case_$r_{\leqslant}2^{11} \mu_b$) to be_able_to assume_that_$\mu = \Theta(\lambda)$. The next lemma,_which_follows from Corollary \[cor:prob:sumset\], provides a suitable bound_on the size of_${\mathcal{D}}(b,\mu)$_when this is not_the case.
\[lem:big:or:small:sumset\] Let $b \in_{\mathbb{N}}$. If $r {\leqslant}2^{11} \mu b$_and $\mu_\not\in (\lambda_/ 2,2\ |
2$. We establish the closure properties of all classes of quantitative languages with respect to these four operations.
author:
- Krishnendu Chatterjee
- Laurent Doyen
- 'Thomas A. Henzinger'
bibliography:
- 'biblio.bib'
title: Expressiveness and Closure Properties for Quantitative Languages
---
Introduction
============
A boolean language $L$ can be viewed as a function that assigns to each word $w$ a boolean value, namely, $L(w) = 1$ if the word $w$ belongs to the language, and $L(w) = 0$ otherwise. Boolean languages model the computations of reactive programs. The verification problem “does the program $A$ satisfy the specification $B$?” then reduces to the language-inclusion problem “is $L_A \subseteq L_B$?”, or equivalently, “is $L_{A}(w)\leq L_{B}(w)$ for all words $w$?”, where $L_A$ represents all behaviors of the program, and $L_B$ contains all behaviors allowed by the specification. When boolean languages are defined by finite automata, this elegant framework is called the *automata-theoretic approach* to model-checking [@VardiW86].
In a natural generalization of this framework, a cost function assigns to each word a real number instead of a boolean value. For instance, the value of a word (or behavior) can be interpreted as the amount of some resource (e.g., memory consumption, or power consumption) that the program needs to produce it, and a specification may assign a maximal amount of available resource to each behavior, or bound the long-run average available use of the resource.
Weighted automata over semirings (i.e., finite automata with transition weights in a semiring structure) have been used to define cost functions, called formal power series for finite words [@Wautomata; @KuichS86] and $\omega$-series for infinite words [@CulikK94; @DrosteK03; @EsikK04]. In [@CDH08], we study new classes of cost functions using operations over rational numbers that do not form a semiring. We call them *quantitative languages*. We set the value of a (finite or infinite) word $w$ as the maximal value of all runs | 2$. We establish the closure properties of all classes of quantitative lyric with obedience to these four operations.
author:
- Krishnendu Chatterjee
- Laurent Doyen
-' Thomas A. Henzinger'
bibliography:
-' biblio.bib'
title: Expressiveness and Closure Properties for Quantitative Languages
---
insertion
= = = = = = = = = = = =
A boolean language $ L$ can be viewed as a routine that assign to each word $ w$ a boolean value, namely, $ L(w) = 1 $ if the news $ w$ belongs to the language, and $ L(w) = 0 $ differently. Boolean languages model the computations of reactive programs. The verification trouble “ does the program $ A$ satisfy the stipulation $ B$? ” then reduces to the linguistic process - inclusion body problem “ is $ L_A \subseteq L_B$? ”, or equivalently, “ is $ L_{A}(w)\leq L_{B}(w)$ for all words $ w$? ”, where $ L_A$ represents all behavior of the program, and $ L_B$ contains all behavior allowed by the stipulation. When boolean languages are define by finite automata, this elegant framework is called the * automata - theoretic overture * to model - checking [ @VardiW86 ].
In a natural generalization of this framework, a cost function assigns to each word a real number instead of a boolean value. For instance, the value of a word (or behavior) can be interpreted as the amount of some resource (e.g., memory pulmonary tuberculosis, or ability consumption) that the course of study need to produce it, and a specification may assign a maximal sum of available resource to each behavior, or bound the long - run average available habit of the resource.
Weighted automata over semirings (i.e., finite automata with transition weights in a semiring structure) have been used to specify cost functions, called formal office serial for finite word [ @Wautomata; @KuichS86 ] and $ \omega$-series for infinite words [ @CulikK94; @DrosteK03; @EsikK04 ]. In [ @CDH08 ], we study newfangled classes of cost functions use operations over rational numbers that do not form a semiring. We address them * quantitative languages *. We fructify the value of a (finite or infinite) word $ w$ as the maximal value of all run | 2$. We establish the closure pvoperties of all classev of qhantitatkve languages with respect tl rhese four operations.
author:
- Krishnenfu Chattwrjet
- Laurent Doyen
- 'Tikmas A. Mznzinfcr'
bibnmography:
- 'biblio.nib'
title: Ex[ressiveness atd Cposure Properties for Quantitative Janguagrs
---
Lntroduction
============
A fooltan lanflane $L$ can be viewed as a function that avsigns to eacn word $w$ a boolean value, nwmelj, $L(w) = 1$ if the word $w$ belongs jk trw language, avd $L(w) = 0$ otherwise. Boolgan languages model the computatkons pf reactivg lrlcrams. The vxrificwtion problem “does tve progtam $A$ satisfy bhe s'ecidication $B$?” then reducxs to the language-inslusion psoylem “is $L_A \subseteq L_V$?”, ir eqoivalantlh, “is $L_{A}(s)\lxq M_{B}(w)$ fog aml words $w$?”, shere $L_A$ represents all behaviprf of the progrzm, and $L_F$ contains all behaviors allowed by the spscification. When booleab languages are defingd by finiee automata, this elegant framework is called the *dutometx-thtovctic qporoach* to model-checking [@VardiW86].
In a natural genqdakidation of this frcmework, a cost finftojn assigns to each ckrs a real number indtead os a biolean vajue. Gor instance, the value of a word (or behcviir) can be interpreced as the aoounj of spme resource (e.g., memory eonsumltion, or poaer consujotion) that the pfoggam teeds to produce it, and a fpecificavion kay asskgn s maxiial amount of aydilable resource tl eack behdvior, or blund the long-run average availauke use of thg rasolrce.
Weighced aubomata over semyrings (i.e., finije automaca witf transitikn weigits in a semyring structusg) have been uved to dqfinw cowt funcgkons, called fotmal poweg feriws for finite wordx [@Waotkmata; @KuichS86] anb $\imega$-series for inwinytv wprqv [@CulikK94; @DrosdeK03; @DsiyL04]. In [@CAH08], we subdy vew vlasses of cost funcdiona using operations oyer ratiobal numbqrs that do npt form a semiring. We cell thxm *quamtijative languages*. We set the valhe of a (flnibe or infinitq) wovd $w$ as the marimal value of all runs | 2$. We establish the closure properties of of languages with to these four - Doyen - 'Thomas Henzinger' bibliography: - title: Expressiveness and Closure Properties for Languages --- Introduction ============ A boolean language $L$ can be viewed as a that assigns to each word $w$ a boolean value, namely, $L(w) = 1$ the $w$ to language, and $L(w) = 0$ otherwise. Boolean languages model the computations of reactive programs. The verification “does the program $A$ satisfy the specification $B$?” reduces to the language-inclusion “is $L_A \subseteq L_B$?”, or “is L_{B}(w)$ for words where represents all behaviors the program, and $L_B$ contains all behaviors allowed by the specification. When boolean languages are defined by automata, this is called *automata-theoretic to [@VardiW86]. In a of this framework, a cost function word a real number instead of a boolean For instance, value of a word (or behavior) be interpreted as the amount of some resource memory consumption, or power consumption) that the program needs to produce it, and a specification a maximal amount of resource to each or the average use of resource. Weighted automata over semirings (i.e., finite automata with transition weights a semiring structure) have been used to define cost functions, power for finite words @KuichS86] and $\omega$-series for words @DrosteK03; @EsikK04]. In [@CDH08], new of operations rational that do not form semiring. We call them *quantitative We set the value word $w$ as the maximal value of all | 2$. We establish the closure propErties of alL clasSes Of qUaNtitAtivE languages with REspeCt to these four operationS.
authOr:
- kRishNEnDu ChaTterjee
- lAuRENt DOyEn
- 'thoMaS a. HEnzinGer'
BibliogRaphy:
- 'bibliO.biB'
tItle: ExpressiVEnEss and ClosUre properties foR QuAntitaTiVe LANguagEs
---
INtrodUction
============
a BooleaN language $l$ cAN be vieWEd as a fuNCTiOn thAt assigns to each woRD $w$ A Boolean value, naMely, $L(w) = 1$ If THe WORd $w$ BelOngs to the lAnGuage, ANd $L(w) = 0$ othERwISE. booLEan languages mOdel the compUTatIons of ReActIVe progRams. THe VEriFication proBlem “Does the prOgram $A$ SAtisfy tHE specifIcatioN $B$?” tHen ReduCEs To The LaNGuaGE-iNclUSioN problem “Is $l_A \SubseTeq L_b$?”, OR EQuivAleNtly, “Is $L_{A}(w)\Leq L_{B}(w)$ for all wOrdS $w$?”, whERe $L_a$ reprEsentS all BeHavioRs of thE progRaM, and $L_B$ contains aLl beHaviors alLowEd By tHe SpeciFIcatioN. WhEn bOolean lAnguageS Are DeFINEd By finite automata, thIs ELEgAnt frameWork is CAlLeD The *automAtA-thEoreTIC apprOach* TO mOdel-checKing [@VaRDiw86].
IN a naturAl GeneraLiZatIon Of thiS FramEwork, a Cost funcTion aSSigns to each worD A real number inSTeAD Of A BoolEan Value. For insTancE, The vAlue OF a WorD (Or behAvior) CaN Be INterpreted as the amouNt Of some ResouRce (e.g., memory coNsumption, oR POWer consuMptiON) tHAt the program neEds to Produce it, aND a specifIcatiOn may assIgn a maximAL Amount of AvaIlaBle ResOURcE to each behaviOR, Or boUnD the lonG-ruN averagE avAilAblE usE oF the resouRce.
WeighTeD aUtOmAta Over sEMirings (i.E., fIniTe AutOmata WIth traNsitiOn weIgHtS In a SemirinG StRUCturE) hAvE beeN usEd To defIne cOSt fUnctionS, called foRmaL PoweR sErIes for fInite words [@WauToMata; @KuichS86] AnD $\omEga$-serIES for infiNite words [@CulikK94; @DrosteK03; @ESIkK04]. In [@CDh08], we Study New cLasses of cOst FunctiOns USing opEratioNs oveR rAtiONAl numBERs ThaT dO not form a sEMIriNg. We cAlL theM *quantiTative languages*. We sET thE value of a (finiTe oR infINItE) woRD $w$ AS thE mAXimAL Value of all runs | 2$. We establish the closu re propert ies o f a llcl asse s of quantitativel angu ages with respect to t hesefo u r op e ra tions .
autho r :- Kri sh ne ndu C h at terje e
- Lauren t Doyen
-'Th om as A. Henzin g er '
bibliogr aph y:
- 'biblio .bi b'
tit le : E x press ive nessand Cl o sure P roperties f o r Quan t itative L an guag es
---
Introduct i on ============
A bool ea n l a n gua ge$L$ can be v iewed as a fu n ct i o n th a t assigns toeach word $ w $ a boole an va l ue, na mely, $ L (w) = 1$ if th e wo rd $w$ be longst o the l a nguage, and $ L(w ) = 0$o th er wis e. Boo l ea n l a ngu ages mod el t he co mput a t i o ns o f r eact ive p rograms. Thever ific a tio n pro blem“doe sthe p rogram $A$sa tisfy the speci fica tion $B$? ” t he n r ed ucest o thelan gua ge-incl usion p r obl em “ i s$L_A \subseteq L_B $? ” , o r equiva lently , “ is $L_{A}(w )\ leq L_{ B } (w)$fora ll words $ w$?”,w he re $L_A$re presen ts al l b ehavi o rs o f theprogram, and$ L_B$ containsa ll behaviorsa ll o w ed by t hespecificati on.W henbool e an la n guage s are d e fi n ed by finite automa ta , this eleg ant framework is called t h e *autom ata- t he o retic approach * tomodel-chec k ing [@Va rdiW8 6].
Ina natural g eneraliz ati onofthi s fr amework, a co s t fun ct ion ass ign s to ea chwor d a re al number i nstead o fabo ol ean valu e . For in st anc e, th e val u e of a word (or b eh a vio r) canb ei n terp re te d as th eamoun t of som e resou rce (e.g. , m e mory c on sumptio n, or power c on sumption)th atthe pr o g ram need s to produce it, and as pecific ati on ma y as sign a ma xim al amo unt of ava ilable reso ur cet o each b eh avi or , or bound t helong- ru n av erage a vailable use of th e re source.
Weig hte d au t o ma tao ve r se mi r ing s (i.e., finite a utomata wi th tr ansition w e igh ts in a s emiring stru c ture) h ave beenused to d ef inec o stfunctions, calledformal po w er se r ie s for fi nite w or ds[@Wau tomata ; @K uichS 86] an d$\omeg a$-se ri es for i nfinite words [@CulikK9 4; @Dr osteK 03; @EsikK04 ].I n [ @CDH08],we s tudy new c las ses of c ost funct ions us ing opera tion s over rat i on aln u mb ers that do n o t f orm a se m iring. Wecall them *quanti t ative language s*.W e se t t h e va lu e of a (finite or i n f inite) w or d $w$ as th e maxima lv alueof all runs | 2$. We_establish the_closure properties of all_classes of_quantitative_languages with_respect_to these four_operations.
author:
- Krishnendu Chatterjee
-_Laurent Doyen
- 'Thomas A._Henzinger'
bibliography:
- 'biblio.bib'
title: Expressiveness_and_Closure Properties for Quantitative Languages
---
Introduction
============
A boolean language $L$ can be viewed as a function_that_assigns to_each_word_$w$ a boolean value, namely,_$L(w) = 1$ if the_word $w$_belongs to the language, and $L(w) = 0$_otherwise._Boolean languages model_the computations of reactive programs. The verification problem “does_the program $A$ satisfy the specification_$B$?” then reduces_to_the_language-inclusion problem “is $L_A_\subseteq L_B$?”, or equivalently, “is $L_{A}(w)\leq_L_{B}(w)$ for all words $w$?”, where $L_A$_represents all behaviors of the program, and_$L_B$ contains all behaviors allowed by_the specification. When boolean languages_are defined_by finite automata, this elegant_framework is called_the *automata-theoretic_approach* to model-checking [@VardiW86].
In_a natural generalization of this framework,_a cost function_assigns to each word a real_number_instead of a_boolean_value._For instance,_the value of_a_word (or_behavior)_can be interpreted as the amount_of_some resource (e.g., memory consumption, or power_consumption) that the program_needs_to produce it, and_a specification may assign a_maximal amount of available resource to_each behavior,_or bound_the long-run average available use of the resource.
Weighted automata over semirings_(i.e., finite automata with transition weights_in a semiring structure)_have been_used_to define cost_functions,_called formal_power series for finite words [@Wautomata; @KuichS86] and_$\omega$-series for_infinite words [@CulikK94; @DrosteK03; @EsikK04]. In [@CDH08], we_study new classes of_cost_functions using operations over rational numbers_that do not form a semiring._We call them *quantitative languages*._We_set_the value of a (finite_or infinite) word $w$ as the_maximal value of_all runs |
" points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to consist of 192 general points on $C$ and one general point of $\lambda$. The first difference of the Hilbert function of $Z$ is
deg 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
$\Delta h_Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0
Note that this is exactly the same as what we would have if we had taken 193 general points of $C$. Again, $r_2(R/I_Z) = 8$. The base locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ and $(I_C)_{10}$ is exactly the non-reduced and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so the Hilbert function of $Z$ is the truncation of the Hilbert function given above. And by the general choice of the points, this will continue to be true regardless of which subsets we take. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ for some $d >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all of the points of $Z$ lie on one reduced and irreducible component of the curve of degree $s$ obtained by our result (since one point lies on the non-reduced component).
[\[Ahn-Migliore\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[two sextics\] We produced Example \[not irred\] by taking almost all of the points on $C$, and just one off of $C$ (in fact, it was on $\lambda$). In this example we show a surprising instance where half of the points of $V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component, but we still have UPP. We again omit some of the technical details.
Let $Q$ be a smooth quadric surface in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by abuse of notation we use the same letter $Q$ to denote the quadratic form defining this surface. Let $C_1$ be a [*general*]{} | " points on $ C$, instead choose $ Z$ to consist of 192 general period on $ C$ and one cosmopolitan point of $ \lambda$. The first remainder of the Hilbert routine of $ Z$ is
deg 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
$ \Delta h_Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0
Note that this is exactly the like as what we would have if we had taken 193 general points of $ C$. Again, $ r_2(R / I_Z) = 8$. The foundation locus of $ (I_C)_{9}$ and $ (I_C)_{10}$ is exactly the non - decreased and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example \[not decr type\ ], so the Hilbert function of $ Z$ is the shortness of the Hilbert function given above. And by the cosmopolitan choice of the point, this will proceed to be true regardless of which subsets we take. therefore $ Z$ has UPP and satisfies $ \Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ for some $ d >
r_2(R / I_Z)$, but not all of the points of $ Z$ lie on one decreased and irreducible component of the bend of degree $ s$ receive by our result (since one point lies on the non - decreased component).
[ \[Ahn - Migliore\ ] Example 5.9\ ] ] { } \[two sextics\ ] We produced Example \[not irred\ ] by taking almost all of the points on $ C$, and just one off of $ C$ (in fact, it was on $ \lambda$). In this example we show a surprising instance where half of the points of $ V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component, but we still have UPP. We again exclude some of the technical details.
Let $ Q$ be a placid quadric open in $ \mathbb P^3 $, and as usual by abuse of notation we practice the same letter $ Q$ to announce the quadratic form defining this surface. lease $ C_1 $ be a [ * general * ] { } | " polnts on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to consist oy 192 genecal poihts on $C$ and one general point of $\lalbea$. Tht first difference uf the Hipbert fubctiib of $Z$ is
deg 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
$\Delta h_Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0
Notq that this ir exactly uhz same as wgat we would have if we had takdn 193 gzneral poinjs ov $C$. Again, $r_2(R/M_Z) = 8$. Tre base locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ dnd $(I_C)_{10}$ os exactly the noi-redyced and reducible cucve of degree 29 mentijned in Efajple \[not decr type\], si the Hiltert dunztikn or $Z$ is thx truncatioh of the Hiobert function givem wvove. And by tge genqrwl choice of the points, this will contitue to be true regardless if which subsets we twke. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ xor skoe $b >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, vuh not all of the points of $Z$ lie on one reducqs snc irreducible gomponent of the cirge jf degree $s$ octaineb bg our result (since one poynt lues on tht non-teduced component).
[\[Ahn-Migliorw\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[tco wextics\] We produceb Example \[noc irrec\] by yaking almost all of thz poinfs on $C$, and just one uff of $C$ (in fact, it wds on $\lambda$). In this exampje we shox a sbrprisine inxtance where halv of bve points of $V$ are on oue irseducible fomponent and the other half arx on another orsedlcible coiponekt, but we still have UPP. We ayain omic some of the tebhnical dxtails.
Let $Q$ fe a smooth qgwdric surfacx in $\mathfb P^3$, and as usuxu by abuse of motation ct use the wame letter $Q$ to dcnote fhe quadratic firm defining this xurwacq. Pev $C_1$ bq a [*general*]{} | " points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ of general points $C$ and one first of the Hilbert of $Z$ is 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $\Delta h_Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0 that this is exactly the same as what would have if we taken 193 general points of Again, = 8$. base of and $(I_C)_{10}$ is the non-reduced and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so the Hilbert of $Z$ truncation of Hilbert given And by the of the points, this will continue regardless of which subsets we take. Hence $Z$ UPP and $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = for some $d > r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all the points of $Z$ lie on one reduced and irreducible component of the curve of obtained by our result one point lies the component). Example \[two sextics\] produced Example \[not irred\] by taking almost all of the points $C$, and just one off of $C$ (in fact, it $\lambda$). this example we a surprising instance where of points of $V$ are irreducible and are another component, but we still UPP. We again omit some the technical details. Let surface in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by of notation we use the same letter to denote the quadratic form defining this surface. Let $C_1$ be a | " points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to Consist of 192 gEneraL poIntS oN $C$ anD one General point of $\LAmbdA$. The first difference of tHe HilBeRT funCTiOn of $Z$ Is
deg 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
$\DeLTa H_z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0
notE tHaT thIs IS eXactlY thE same as What we woulD haVe If we had taken 193 GEnEral points Of $C$. again, $r_2(R/I_Z) = 8$. The BasE locus Of $(i_C)_{9}$ aND $(I_C)_{10}$ is ExaCtly tHe non-rEDuced aNd reducibLe CUrve of DEgree 29 meNTIoNed iN Example \[not decr tyPE\], sO The Hilbert funcTion of $z$ iS ThE TRunCatIon of the HiLbErt fuNCtion giVEn ABOVe. AND by the general Choice of the POinTs, this WiLl cONtinue To be tRuE RegArdless of whIch sUbsets we tAke. HenCE $Z$ has UPp And satiSfies $\DEltA h_Z(D) = \DelTA h_z(d+1) = S$ foR sOMe $d >
R_2(r/I_z)$, buT Not All of the PoInTs of $Z$ Lie oN ONE ReduCed And iRreduCible componenT of The cURve Of degRee $s$ oBtaiNeD by ouR resulT (sincE oNe point lies on thE non-Reduced coMpoNeNt).
[\[AHn-migliORe\] ExamPle 5.9\]]{} \[Two Sextics\] we produCEd EXaMPLE \[nOt irred\] by taking almOsT ALl Of the poiNts on $C$, ANd JuST one off oF $C$ (In fAct, iT WAs on $\lAmbdA$). in This examPle we sHOw A sUrprisiNg InstanCe WheRe hAlf of THe poInts of $v$ are on onE irreDUcible componenT And the other haLF aRE On ANothEr iRreducible cOmpoNEnt, bUt we STiLl hAVe UPP. we agaIn OMiT Some of the technical dEtAils.
LeT $Q$ be a Smooth quadric Surface in $\mATHBb P^3$, and as UsuaL By ABuse of notation We use The same letTEr $Q$ to denOte thE quadratIc form defINIng this sUrfAce. let $c_1$ be A [*GEnEral*]{} | " points on $C$, instead c hoose $Z$to co nsi stof 192 gen eral points on $C$and one general pointof $\ la m bda$ . T he fi rst dif f er e n ceof t heHi l be rt fu nct ion of$Z$ is
deg 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
----------- - -- --- --- --- -- -- --- -- -- - --- - - --- ---- - -- - --- - ---- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- ---- ---- -- --
$ \Delt ah _Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 2 9 0
No tethat this is exactly t hesame aswhatwe wo uldha ve if we ha d tak en 193 general po ints of $C$.Aga in , $ r_ 2(R/I _ Z) = 8 $.The base l ocus of $(I _C ) _ { 9} $ and $(I_C)_{10}$ i s ex actly th e non- r ed uc e d and re du cib le c u r ve of deg r ee 29 ment ionedi nEx ample \ [n ot dec rtyp e\] , sot he H ilbert functio n of$ Z$ is the trun c ation of theH il b e rt func tio n given abo ve.A nd b y th e g ene r al ch oiceof th e points, this willco ntinue to b e true regard less of wh i c h subsets wet ak e . Hence $Z$ ha s UPP and satis f ies $\De lta h _Z(d) =\Delta h_ Z ( d+1) = s $ f orsom e $ d >r_2(R/I_Z)$,b u t no tall ofthe points of $Z $ l ieon one redu ced andir re du ci ble comp o nent ofth e c ur veof de g ree $s $ obt aine dby our result (s i n ce o ne p oint li es on t he n o n-r educedcomponent ).[\[A hn -M igliore \] Example 5. 9\ ]]{} \[two s ext ics\]W e produce d Example \[not irred\] by taki ngalmos t al l of thepoi nts on $C $ , andjust o ne of fof$ C $ (in f ac t,it was on $\ l a mbd a$).In thi s examp le we show a surpr i sin g instance wh ere hal f of th e p o int so f $ V $ are on one irr educible c om p on ent and th e ot he r halfare onanoth e r irred ucible co mponent,bu t we s til l have UPP . We aga in omit s o me of th e tec hni cal de ta ils .
Le t $Q$b e a smoo th qua dr ic sur facein $\mathb b P^3$, and as usual by abuse of n ota tion we u set hesame lett er $ Q$ to deno tethe quad rat i c for m de f in ing thissurf a ce. Let $ C _1 $ b e a[*general*] { } | " points_on $C$,_instead choose $Z$ to_consist of_192_general points_on_$C$ and one_general point of_$\lambda$. The first difference_of the Hilbert_function_of $Z$ is
deg __ _0__ 1 2_ 3 _ 4_ 5 6__ 7_ 8 9 _ 10 11_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_-------------- --- --- --- ---- ----_---- ---- ----_---- ---- ---- ---- -- --_--_-- -- --_--_--_-- --_-- -- --_--_-- --_--_--
$\Delta h_Z$ __1 3 6_ 10 __15 20_ 24 _27 29 _29 _ 29_ 0 _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _
Note that this is exactly the_same as what we would_have_if_we had taken 193 general_points of $C$. Again, $r_2(R/I_Z) =_8$. The base_locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ and $(I_C)_{10}$ is exactly_the_non-reduced and reducible curve of degree_29_mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so_the_Hilbert_function of $Z$ is the_truncation of the Hilbert function given_above. And by the general choice of the points,_this will continue_to be true regardless of_which_subsets_we take. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d)_= \Delta_h_Z(d+1) = s$_for some $d >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all of the points_of $Z$ lie on one reduced and_irreducible component of the curve of degree $s$ obtained by our_result (since one point lies on the non-reduced_component).
[\[Ahn-Migliore\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[two sextics\] We produced_Example \[not irred\] by_taking_almost all of the points on $C$,_and_just_one_off of $C$_(in fact, it_was on $\lambda$)._In this_example we show_a surprising_instance where half_of_the points of $V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component,_but we still have UPP. We_again omit some of the_technical_details.
Let $Q$ be_a smooth quadric surface_in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by abuse_of notation we use the same letter $Q$ to_denote_the quadratic_form defining this surface._Let $C_1$_be a_[*general*]{} |
training set, to evaluate the attribute generation performance, whose average precision on CelebA testing set is $91.7\%$, close to state-of-the-art performance. F1 score is reported as precision and recall may vary due to threshold setting.
We apply 3DA-GAN on the negative samples (without the target attribute) to generate the images with target attribute, serving as positive samples. Further, FID [@fid2017] is computed to evaluate the photo-realisticity of the attribute augmented images.
In Table \[tab:attr\_real\], we compare to several state-of-the-arts, FaderNet [@fadernet], AttGAN [@attgan], StarGAN [@stargan] and CycleGAN [@CycleGAN2017]. The last two are retrained on original celebA real data, real plus pose augmented data (“real-a”) as well as our UV texture and position data. For “Ours”, we apply our proposed loss instead of StarGAN or CycleGAN loss. The numbers in Table \[tab:attr\_real\] clearly show that our proposed 3DA-GAN consistently achieves higher F1 score than the state-of-the-arts. Moreover, our method also achieves consistently lower FID score. On CycleGAN (ResNet) model, our method FID score is close to the one trained on “real-a”, tie on $yaw < 45$ and slightly better on $yaw \ge 45$. However, our method achieves much higher F1 score (precision and recall), more than $10\%$ higher on “SM” and “BA”, compared to CyCleGAN trained on “real-a” across yaw $< 45$ and $\ge 45$.
**Identity Preserving Property:** we apply a state-of-the-art face recognition engine, ArcFace [@arcface] to provide the identity feature. For each verification pair, we randomly select one image without the target attribute, apply our method to generate the target attribute, and evaluate the similarity between the generated target attribute image and the not selected image. We independently run experiments for those 5 attributes. In Table \[tab:idp\_ijba\], “Original” means the original verification accuracy without any attribute generation, which serves as the upper bound for all methods. Compared to other methods, our 3DA-GAN achieves almost all higher verification accuracy while slightly worse on lipstick. Nevertheless, our | training set, to evaluate the attribute coevals operation, whose average precision on CelebA examination set is $ 91.7\%$, airless to state - of - the - artwork operation. F1 score is reported as precision and recall may vary due to threshold mount.
We apply 3DA - GAN on the negative sample distribution (without the prey attribute) to generate the images with target attribute, serve as positive samples. Further, FID [ @fid2017 ] is calculate to evaluate the photo - realisticity of the property augmented image.
In Table \[tab: attr\_real\ ], we compare to several state - of - the - arts, FaderNet [ @fadernet ], AttGAN [ @attgan ], StarGAN [ @stargan ] and CycleGAN [ @CycleGAN2017 ]. The last two are retrained on original celebA veridical data, real plus pose augmented data (“ real - a ”) as well as our UV texture and position data. For “ Ours ”, we apply our proposed loss instead of StarGAN or CycleGAN loss. The numbers in Table \[tab: attr\_real\ ] clearly prove that our proposed 3DA - GAN consistently achieve eminent F1 sexual conquest than the state - of - the - arts. Moreover, our method also achieves consistently humble FID score. On CycleGAN (ResNet) model, our method FID score is close to the one trained on “ substantial - a ”, tie on $ yaw < 45 $ and slightly better on $ yaw \ge 45$. However, our method achieve much high F1 sexual conquest (precision and recall), more than $ 10\%$ higher on “ SM ” and “ BA ”, compared to CyCleGAN trained on “ veridical - a ” across yaw $ < 45 $ and $ \ge 45$.
* * Identity Preserving Property :* * we apply a state - of - the - artwork face realization engine, ArcFace [ @arcface ] to provide the identity feature. For each verification pair, we randomly choose one image without the target attribute, apply our method to render the target property, and evaluate the similarity between the generated prey attribute image and the not choose image. We independently run experiments for those 5 attributes. In Table \[tab: idp\_ijba\ ], “ Original ” means the original verification accuracy without any attribute generation, which serves as the upper bound for all methods. Compared to early methods, our 3DA - GAN achieves about all higher verification accuracy while slightly bad on lipstick. Nevertheless, our | trwining set, to evaluate tme attribute gengrqtion 'erformznce, whore average precision on CeleuA twstint set is $91.7\%$, close to stage-of-the-arn performqnce. D1 score is reported as pdccisimi and recall mai vary due tm threshold sedtkny.
We apply 3DA-GAN on the negative sampjes (witnokt the target wttrpbtte) fo generate the images with target attriblte, serving as poxitive samples. Further, FID [@vid2017] ls computed to evapuate the pyoto-wwalisticity uf the attgnbute augmehted images.
In Table \[tab:attr\_real\], de cokpare to sgrwrap state-of-the-erts, FwderNet [@faderkvt], AttGDN [@attgam], StarGAN [@stargsn] end XycleGAN [@CycleGAN2017]. The nast two are retrayned on osiyinal celebA real datq, eeal klus [ose qugoenued dzta (“rewl-a”) as well aa our UV tezture and position caeq. For “Ours”, we apply otr proposed loss instead of StarGAN or ByclsGAN loss. The numbers ib Table \[tab:attr\_real\] clgarly show that our proposed 3DA-GAN consistently achieves hicher H1 rcoxc gyaj the state-of-the-arts. Moreover, our method also zcnivves consistently lower FID xclrr. On CycleGAN (TesNet) modsl, our method FID dcore if clowe to the one trained on “real-a”, tie on $yaq < 45$ and sligktlt better on $yaw \ge 45$. However, obr metnod avhieves much higher F1 seore (pdecision anf recall), jure than $10\%$ higher on “SK” and “BA”, compared to CyCleDAN trainxd on “real-a” xcroxs yaw $< 45$ and $\ge 45$.
**Ldentldy Preserving Propfrty:** ce ap[ly a statf-of-the-art face recognition engiix, ArcFace [@arcfsca] tm providz the ldentity featurq. For each vernficatiou pair, we randommy selert one image without the dwrget attribnte, apply our metyod to ednerate the tatget attrpbbte, and ecaluate the similavity cstween the genexcttd target attribite imwgv aid thq not selecteg imxge. Ee inaependently fun rxperiments for thosa 5 aftributes. In Table \[yan:idp\_ijba\], “Iriginal” means the oroginal verificatioj accnracy xithouy agy attribute generation, which aerves as thc upper bound for all methods. Compared to other methods, our 3DA-GAN aciieves almost all highgr verification accurccn while sligitly wjrse on lhpstick. Nevertheless, our | training set, to evaluate the attribute generation average on CelebA set is $91.7\%$, score reported as precision recall may vary to threshold setting. We apply 3DA-GAN the negative samples (without the target attribute) to generate the images with target serving as positive samples. Further, FID [@fid2017] is computed to evaluate the photo-realisticity the augmented In \[tab:attr\_real\], we compare to several state-of-the-arts, FaderNet [@fadernet], AttGAN [@attgan], StarGAN [@stargan] and CycleGAN [@CycleGAN2017]. The two are retrained on original celebA real data, plus pose augmented data as well as our UV and data. For we our loss instead of or CycleGAN loss. The numbers in Table \[tab:attr\_real\] clearly show that our proposed 3DA-GAN consistently achieves higher score than Moreover, our also consistently FID score. On model, our method FID score is one trained on “real-a”, tie on $yaw < and slightly on $yaw \ge 45$. However, our achieves much higher F1 score (precision and recall), than $10\%$ higher on “SM” and “BA”, compared to CyCleGAN trained on “real-a” across yaw and $\ge 45$. **Identity Property:** we apply state-of-the-art recognition ArcFace to provide identity feature. For each verification pair, we randomly select one image the target attribute, apply our method to generate the target evaluate similarity between the target attribute image and not image. We independently run those attributes. “Original” the verification accuracy without any generation, which serves as the bound for all methods. 3DA-GAN achieves almost all higher verification accuracy while worse on lipstick. Nevertheless, our | training set, to evaluate the aTtribute geNeratIon PerFoRmanCe, whOse average precISion On CelebA testing set is $91.7\%$, clOse to StATe-of-THe-Art peRformanCE. F1 SCOre Is RePorTeD As PreciSioN and recAll may vary Due To Threshold setTInG.
We apply 3DA-gAN On the negativE saMples (wItHouT The taRgeT attrIbute) tO GeneraTe the imagEs WIth tarGEt attriBUTe, ServIng as positive sampLEs. fUrther, FID [@fid2017] is ComputEd TO eVALuaTe tHe photo-reaLiSticiTY of the aTTrIBUTe aUGmented images.
in Table \[tab:aTTr\_rEal\], we cOmParE To seveRal stAtE-Of-tHe-arts, Fadernet [@fAdernet], AtTGAN [@atTGan], StargaN [@stargAn] and CYclEGAn [@CycLEGaN2017]. the LaST twO ArE reTRaiNed on oriGiNaL celeBA reAL DATa, reAl pLus pOse auGmented data (“reAl-a”) As weLL as Our UV TextuRe anD pOsitiOn data. for “OuRs”, We apply our propoSed lOss insteaD of stArGaN Or CycLEGAN loSs. THe nUmbers iN Table \[tAB:atTr\_REAL\] cLearly show that our pRoPOSeD 3DA-GAN coNsisteNTlY aCHieves hiGhEr F1 ScorE THan thE staTE-oF-the-arts. moreovER, oUr Method aLsO achieVeS coNsiStentLY lowEr FID sCore. On CyCleGAn (resNet) model, our MEthod FID score IS cLOSe TO the One Trained on “reAl-a”, tIE on $yAw < 45$ anD SlIghTLy betTer on $YaW \Ge 45$. hOwever, our method achiEvEs much HigheR F1 score (precisIon and recaLL), MOre than $10\%$ hIgheR On “sm” and “BA”, compared To CyCLeGAN trainED on “real-a” AcrosS yaw $< 45$ and $\gE 45$.
**Identity pREserving proPerTy:** wE apPLY a State-of-the-art FACe reCoGnition EngIne, ArcFAce [@ArcFacE] to PrOvide the iDentity fEaTuRe. foR eaCh verIFication PaIr, wE rAndOmly sELect onE imagE witHoUt THe tArget atTRiBUTe, apPlY oUr meThoD tO geneRate THe tArget atTribute, anD evALuatE tHe SimilarIty between the GeNerated tarGeT atTributE IMage and tHe not selected image. We indEPendentLy rUn expErimEnts for thOse 5 AttribUteS. in TablE \[tab:idP\_ijba\], “orIgiNAL” meanS THe OriGiNal verificATIon AccurAcY witHout any Attribute generatioN, WhiCh serves as the UppEr boUND fOr aLL mEThoDs. cOmpAREd to other methodS, our 3DA-GAN aChIEvEs almost alL HigHeR verifiCation aCcuraCY while sLightly woRse on lipsTiCk. NeVERthEless, our | training set, to evaluate the attri butegen era ti on p erfo rmance, whosea vera ge precision on CelebA test in g set is $91. 7\%$, c l os e tost at e-o f- t he -artper formanc e. F1 scor e i sreported asp re cision and re call may var y d ue toth res h old s ett ing.
We ap p ly 3DA -GAN on t he negati v e sampl e s ( with out the target at t ri b ute) to genera te the i m ag e s wi thtarget att ri bute, serving as p o sit i ve samples. F urther, FID [@f id2017 ]isc ompute d toev a lua te the phot o-re alisticit y of t h e attri b ute aug mented im age s.
I nTa ble \ [ tab : at tr\ _ rea l\], weco mp are t o se v e r a l st ate -of- the-a rts, FaderNet [@ fade r net ], At tGAN[@at tg an],StarGA N [@s ta rgan] and Cycle GAN[@CycleGA N20 17 ].Th e las t two a reret rainedon orig i nal c e l e bA real data, real p lu s po se augme nted d a ta ( “ real-a”) a s w ella s ourUV t e xt ure andpositi o nda ta. For “ Ours”, w e a ppl y our prop osed l oss inst ead o f StarGAN or Cy c leGAN loss. T h en u mb e rs i n T able \[tab: attr \ _rea l\]c le arl y show that o u rp roposed 3DA-GAN con si stentl y ach ieves higherF1 score t h a n the sta te-o f -t h e-arts. Moreov er, o ur methoda lso achi evesconsiste ntly lowe r FID scor e.OnCyc leG A N ( ResNet) model , ourme thod FI D s core is cl ose to th eone train ed on “r ea l- a” ,tie on $ y aw < 45$ a ndsl igh tly b e tter o n $ya w \g e45 $ . H owever, ou r meth od a chie ves m uch h ighe r F1 score(precisio n a n d re ca ll ), more than $10\%$hi gher on “S M” an d “BA” , compared to CyCleGAN trained on “real-a ” a cross yaw $< 45$ a nd$\ge 4 5$.
**Ide ntityPrese rv ing P roper t y :* * w eapply a st a t e-o f-the -a rt f ace rec ognition engine, A r cFa ce [@arcface] to pro v i de th e i d ent it y fe a t ure. For each v erificatio np ai r, we rand o mly s elect o ne imag e wit h out the target a ttribute, a pply o urmethod togenerate the targ e t att r ib ute,and evalu at e t he si milari t y b etwee n thege nerate d tar ge t attrib ute image and the not s electe d ima ge. We indep end e ntl y run exp erim ents for t hos e 5 attr ibu t es. I n Ta b le \[ t ab:id p\_i j ba\], “Or i gi nal ” me ans the ori g i n alverif ica t ion ac cura cy without any at t ribute generat ion, w hic h s e rves a s the upper bo und f o r all met ho ds. Compare d to oth er metho ds, ou r 3DA- GAN ach i e ve s almos t al l h igher ver ifi ca t ion acc ur ac y while sli gh tly wo rse on lips t i ck. Nevertheless , our | training_set, to_evaluate the attribute generation_performance, whose_average_precision on_CelebA_testing set is_$91.7\%$, close to_state-of-the-art performance. F1 score_is reported as_precision_and recall may vary due to threshold setting.
We apply 3DA-GAN on the negative samples_(without_the target_attribute)_to_generate the images with target_attribute, serving as positive samples._Further, FID [@fid2017]_is computed to evaluate the photo-realisticity of the_attribute_augmented images.
In Table \[tab:attr\_real\],_we compare to several state-of-the-arts, FaderNet [@fadernet], AttGAN [@attgan], StarGAN [@stargan] and_CycleGAN [@CycleGAN2017]. The last two are retrained_on original celebA_real_data,_real plus pose augmented_data (“real-a”) as well as our_UV texture and position data. For_“Ours”, we apply our proposed loss instead_of StarGAN or CycleGAN loss. The_numbers in Table \[tab:attr\_real\] clearly show_that our_proposed 3DA-GAN consistently achieves higher_F1 score than_the state-of-the-arts._Moreover, our method_also achieves consistently lower FID score._On CycleGAN (ResNet)_model, our method FID score is_close_to the one_trained_on_“real-a”, tie_on $yaw <_45$_and slightly_better_on $yaw \ge 45$. However, our_method_achieves much higher F1 score (precision and_recall), more than $10\%$_higher_on “SM” and “BA”,_compared to CyCleGAN trained on_“real-a” across yaw $< 45$ and_$\ge 45$.
**Identity_Preserving Property:**_we apply a state-of-the-art face recognition engine, ArcFace [@arcface] to provide the_identity feature. For each verification pair,_we randomly select one_image without_the_target attribute, apply_our_method to_generate the target attribute, and evaluate the_similarity between_the generated target attribute image and_the not selected image._We_independently run experiments for those 5_attributes. In Table \[tab:idp\_ijba\], “Original” means the_original verification accuracy without any_attribute_generation,_which serves as the upper_bound for all methods. Compared to_other methods, our_3DA-GAN achieves almost all higher verification accuracy_while_slightly worse on lipstick. Nevertheless, our |
the Elba network with networks obtained for tourism regions in other continents, such as America and Asia, in order to search for similar and distinct properties. The reported methodology can also be applied as a means to obtain a comparative analysis between tourism destinations in the first and third world.
*Simulations:* Given a network such as that analyzed in this work and its respective comprehensive characterization, it would be interesting to perform simulations involving the addition or removal of connections, in order to investigate effects of communication failures as well as the creation of new partnerships.
*Inference of Growth Models:* The comprehensive characterization of the Elba tourism destination network in terms of structural and dynamical features reported in this article has paved the way to attempts to obtain growth models capable of reproducing the observed structure, possibly under the effect of the respective dynamics. For instance, after starting with a small random structure, new connections could be established while taking into account regional proximity, possibly involving the path-regular knitted network [@Costa_comp:2007] to interconnect the companies according to their positions. Such growth models would allow a yet more complete understanding of tourism destination systems.
Luciano da F. Costa thanks CNPq (308231/03-1) and FAPESP (05/00587-5) for sponsorship.
---
abstract: 'A simple statistical model is proposed, which considers the turbulent flow as a collection of localized structures (eddies). The model successfully predicts the transition to the turbulent regime at high Reynolds numbers and shows agreement with other known properties of turbulent flows. Comparison of the assumptions underlying the model and Navier-Stokes equation suggests that the driving force for the turbulent transition is basically the tendency of the system to occupy a statistically dominant state; the instability of the flow plays a role of the mechanism for finding this state.'
author:
- 'Sergei F. Chekmarev$^{1,2}$'
title: 'Driving force for turbulent transition: Dynamical instability or statistical preference?'
---
The transition from laminar to turbulent fluid flow, originally studied by Reynolds in his seminal work [@Reynolds1883], is still in focus of many researchers. It is a very complex phenomenon, which has a variety of scenarios and is generally dependent on the flow environment [@MoninYaglom; @LandauLifshitz_fluid_mech; @Lesieur]. In the simplest cases, the transition is related to the dynamical instability of a laminar flow at high | the Elba network with networks obtained for tourism regions in early continent, such as America and Asia, in order to search for exchangeable and clear-cut properties. The reported methodology can also be lend oneself as a means to obtain a relative psychoanalysis between tourism destinations in the first and third worldly concern.
* Simulations :* Given a network such as that analyze in this work and its respective comprehensive characterization, it would be interesting to perform simulations involving the accession or removal of connections, in order to investigate effects of communication failure as well as the creation of new partnerships.
* Inference of Growth Models :* The comprehensive word picture of the Elba tourism destination network in terms of structural and dynamical feature reported in this article has paved the way to attempts to obtain increase models capable of reproducing the observed structure, possibly under the effect of the respective dynamics. For instance, after starting with a small random social organization, fresh connections could be establish while remove into account regional proximity, possibly involving the path - regular knitted network [ @Costa_comp:2007 ] to interconnect the companies according to their position. Such growth models would allow a yet more complete understanding of tourism address systems.
Luciano da F. Costa thanks CNPq (308231/03 - 1) and FAPESP (05/00587 - 5) for sponsorship.
---
abstract:' A simple statistical model is proposed, which consider the disruptive flow as a collection of localized social organization (eddies). The model successfully predicts the transition to the turbulent regime at high Reynolds numbers and show agreement with other know properties of disruptive flows. Comparison of the premise underlying the exemplar and Navier - Stokes equation suggest that the driving force for the churning transition is basically the leaning of the system to occupy a statistically dominant state; the instability of the flow plays a role of the mechanism for finding this state of matter.'
author:
-' Sergei F. Chekmarev$^{1,2}$'
title:' drive force for turbulent transition: Dynamical instability or statistical preference?'
---
The conversion from laminar to turbulent fluid flow, originally studied by Reynolds in his seminal employment [ @Reynolds1883 ], is however in stress of many research worker. It is a very complex phenomenon, which has a variety of scenario and is generally dependent on the stream environment [ @MoninYaglom; @LandauLifshitz_fluid_mech; @Lesieur ]. In the simplest cases, the transition is relate to the dynamical instability of a laminar flow at high | thf Elba network with netwurks obtained for tourmsm regjons in uther continents, such as Amecica and Qsia, in order to searcf for simplar and eistmnct properties. Vge repovced msbhodonigy can also bg applied as a means to obdakn a comparative analysis between touwism dextlnations in thg firxe ans third world.
*Simulations:* Given a nstwork vuch as that snalyzed in this work and lts gespective comprehfnsive charqctewuzation, it wuuld be inuexesting to kerform simulations involving thd addntion or renocal mf connectiins, ig order to iknestigade effevts of communigatioi faulures as well as the creation of new pwrtnershi[s.
*Nnference of Growth Midwls:* Tve cmmprdyenrivt ciarzcterixatmon of the Slba tourisn destination netwotk pm terms of sfructuwaj and dynamical features reported in thps adticle has paved the wat to attempts to obtaln growth models capable of reproducing the observed strucdure, 'orsiyoy unawr the effect of the respective dynamics. For inffamcv, after starting cith a small rancol xjructure, new cunnectnkna could be establidhed whyle tqking intj acvount regional proximity, powsibly involning the path-regular kuitted netwoxk [@Costs_comp:2007] to interconnect the coopanjes accordijg to thejf positions. Such grpwdh models would allow a yee more conplece underrtancing os tourism festikdtion systems.
Luciajo da F. Costa thajks CNPq (308231/03-1) and FAPESP (05/00587-5) for sponsorship.
---
abstracj: 'A sikple stacisticsl model is pwoposed, which eonsiderf the turbulent flow av a collectyon of localisgd structures (eddies). Ehe nodeo succerrfully predictx the traufitiin to the turbulenb regkje at high Reynildw numbers and snowr adrvemxnt wydh other knofn pfopdtties of turbulekt wlowx. Comparison of the dssujptions underlying tme model qnd Naviqr-Stokes equayion suggests that the vrivinj forcr fjr the turbulent transition is basicallj tme tendency os thc syftem to oceupy a statistically dominant state; the mnstability of the flow plays a role of thg mtchanism for hindind this stdte.'
author:
- 'Sergei F. Cyekmarev$^{1,2}$'
title: 'Driying force for turbuleht tratsitiln: Dynamical instability or statistical preference?'
---
The transition from lamunar to turbulent rluic flof, jxiginaljy svuvied by Reynolds pn his seminal work [@Reynolds1883], is rtill in fjcus of many researchers. It os a very complgx phenomenon, which has a bariety pf scenarios and is generally drpendent on the flow envlronment [@NoninGaglom; @LanvauLifshitz_fluid_mech; @Lesiebr]. In rhe simplesb cases, the trxnsotlon is relwted tk the dynamical instability of a laminqr flow at high | the Elba network with networks obtained for in continents, such America and Asia, similar distinct properties. The methodology can also applied as a means to obtain comparative analysis between tourism destinations in the first and third world. *Simulations:* Given network such as that analyzed in this work and its respective comprehensive characterization, would interesting perform involving the addition or removal of connections, in order to investigate effects of communication failures as as the creation of new partnerships. *Inference of Models:* The comprehensive characterization the Elba tourism destination network terms structural and features in article has paved way to attempts to obtain growth models capable of reproducing the observed structure, possibly under the effect the respective instance, after with small structure, new connections established while taking into account regional the path-regular knitted network [@Costa_comp:2007] to interconnect the according to positions. Such growth models would allow yet more complete understanding of tourism destination systems. da F. Costa thanks CNPq (308231/03-1) and FAPESP (05/00587-5) for sponsorship. --- abstract: 'A simple is proposed, which considers turbulent flow as collection localized (eddies). model successfully the transition to the turbulent regime at high Reynolds numbers and agreement with other known properties of turbulent flows. Comparison of underlying model and Navier-Stokes suggests that the driving for turbulent transition is basically of system statistically state; instability of the flow a role of the mechanism finding this state.' author: 'Driving force for turbulent transition: Dynamical instability or preference?' --- The transition from laminar to fluid flow, originally studied by Reynolds in his seminal work [@Reynolds1883], is in focus researchers. It is a very complex phenomenon, which a variety of scenarios is generally dependent on the flow environment [@MoninYaglom; @LandauLifshitz_fluid_mech; In simplest cases, transition is related the dynamical instability a laminar flow | the Elba network with networkS obtained fOr touRisM reGiOns iN othEr continents, suCH as AMerica and Asia, in order to SearcH fOR simILaR and dIstinct PRoPERtiEs. thE rePoRTeD methOdoLogy can Also be applIed As A means to obtaIN a ComparativE anAlysis betweeN toUrism dEsTinATions In tHe firSt and tHIrd worLd.
*SimulatIoNS:* Given A Network SUCh As thAt analyzed in this wORk ANd its respectivE comprEhENsIVE chAraCterizatioN, iT woulD Be interEStING To pERform simulatiOns involvinG The AdditiOn Or rEMoval oF connEcTIonS, in order to iNvesTigate effEcts of COmmunicATion faiLures aS weLl aS the CReAtIon Of NEw pARtNerSHipS.
*InferenCe Of growtH ModELS:* tHe coMprEhenSive cHaracterizatiOn oF the eLba TouriSm desTinaTiOn netWork in Terms Of Structural and dyNamiCal featurEs rEpOrtEd In thiS ArticlE haS paVed the wAy to attEMptS tO OBTaIn growth models capaBlE OF rEproduciNg the oBSeRvED structuRe, PosSiblY UNder tHe efFEcT of the reSpectiVE dYnAmics. FoR iNstancE, aFteR stArtinG With A small Random stRuctuRE, new connectionS Could be establIShED WhILe taKinG into accounT regIOnal ProxIMiTy, pOSsiblY invoLvINg THe path-regular knitteD nEtwork [@costa_Comp:2007] to intercoNnect the coMPANies accoRdinG To THeir positions. SUch grOwth models WOuld alloW a yet More compLete underSTAnding of TouRisM deStiNATiOn systems.
LuciANO da F. coSta thanKs CnPq (308231/03-1) and FaPEsP (05/00587-5) fOr sPonSoRship.
---
abstRact: 'A simPlE sTaTiStiCal moDEl is propOsEd, wHiCh cOnsidERs the tUrbulEnt fLoW aS A coLlectioN Of LOCaliZeD sTrucTurEs (EddieS). The MOdeL succesSfully preDicTS the TrAnSition tO the turbulent ReGime at high reYnoLds numBERs and shoWs agreement with other knoWN properTieS of tuRbulEnt flows. COmpArison Of tHE assumPtions UnderLyIng THE modeL ANd navIeR-Stokes equATIon SuggeStS thaT the driVing force for the turBUleNt transition iS baSicaLLY tHe tENdENcy Of THe sYSTem to occupy a staTistically DoMInAnt state; thE InsTaBility oF the floW playS A role of The mechanIsm for finDiNg thIS StaTe.'
author:
- 'SeRgei F. CheKmarev$^{1,2}$'
titLE: 'DrivINg Force For TurbulEnT trAnsitIon: DynAMicAl insTabiliTy Or statIsticAl PreferenCe?'
---
The transition from lamiNar to tUrbulEnt Fluid flow, OriGInaLly studieD by REynolds in hIs sEmiNal woRk [@REYnoldS1883], is sTIlL in FOcus oF manY ResearcheRS. IT is A VErY complex pheNOMEnoN, whicH haS A varieTy of Scenarios and is genERally dependent On thE FLow EnvIRonmEnT [@MoninYaglom; @LaNdaULIFShitz_fluId_Mech; @Lesieur]. in the simPlESt casEs, the tRansitIon is reLATeD To the dYnamIcaL instabilIty Of A Laminar FlOw AT high | the Elba network with net works obta inedfor to ur ismregi ons in other c o ntin ents, such as Americaand A si a , in or der t o searc h f o r si mi la r a nd di stinc t p roperti es. The re por te d methodolog y c an also be ap plied as a m ean s to o bt ain a com par ative analy s is bet ween tour is m desti n ationsi n t he f irst and third wo r ld .
*Simulations :* Giv en an e two rksuch as th at anal y zed int hi s w ork and its respe ctive compr e hen sive c ha rac t erizat ion,it wou ld be inter esti ng to per form s i mulatio n s invol ving t headd itio n o rrem ov a l o f c onn e cti ons, inor de r toinve s t i g ateeff ects of c ommunicationfai lure s as well as t he c re ation of ne w par tn erships.
*Infe renc e of Grow thMo del s: * The compre hen siv e chara cteriza t ion o f t he Elba tourism dest in a t io n networ k in t e rm so f struct ur alandd y namic al f e at ures rep ortedi nth is arti cl e haspa ved th e way to a ttempt s to obt ain g r owth models ca p able of repro d uc i n gt he o bse rved struct ure, poss ibly un der the e ffect o f t h e respective dynami cs . Forinsta nce, after st arting wit h a small r ando m s t ructure, new c onnec tions coul d be esta blish ed while taking i n t o accoun t r egi ona l p r o xi mity, possibl y invo lv ing the pa th-regu lar kn itt edne twork [@C osta_com p: 20 07 ]tointer c onnect t he co mp ani es ac c ording to t heir p os i tio ns. Suc h g r o wthmo de ls w oul dallow a y e t m ore com plete und ers t andi ng o f touri sm destinatio nsystems.
Lu cia no daF . Costa t hanks CNPq (308231/03-1 ) and FA PES P (05 /005 87-5) for sp onsors hip .
---abstra ct: ' Asim p l e sta t i st ica lmodel is p r o pos ed, w hi ch c onsider s the turbulent fl o w a s a collectio n o f lo c a li zed st r uct ur e s ( e d dies). The mode l successf ul l ypredicts t h e t ra nsition to the turb u lent re gime at h igh Reyno ld s nu m b ers and shows agreeme nt with o t her k n ow n pro per ties o ftur bulen t flow s . C ompar ison o fthe as sumpt io ns under lying the model and Nav ier-St okesequ ation sug ges t s t hat the d rivi ng force f orthe turb ule n t tra nsit i on is basic ally the tende n cy of t he system too c c upy a st ati s ticall y do minant state; the instability of the f low pl a ys a r ole of the mec han is m for find in g this stat e.'
auth or :
- 'S ergeiF. Che kmarev$ ^ { 1, 2 }$'
ti tle: 'D riving fo rce f o r turbu le nt transi tion :Dynami cal in s tabi l i ty or statistica l pre f e rence ? '
- --
T he transi t ionfrom lamin ar to turbu lent f luid flow , origi na lly st udi ed by Reynol d s in hissemin al work [ @Rey nol ds1883 ], i s still info cus of manyr e se a rc he r s.It i s a v er y co mplex phe n omenon,whi c h has a v ari e t y of s c en a r ios and is ge neral l y dependent on t h ef low e nviron ment [ @MoninY a glo m; @Landa uLi f s hitz_flui d_mech; @ L esi eu r].In the s im ples tcas es , the transitio n is rel ated tot h e dyna mic a l in s tabili ty of a lamina r flo wa t high | the_Elba network_with networks obtained for_tourism regions_in_other continents,_such_as America and_Asia, in order_to search for similar_and distinct properties._The_reported methodology can also be applied as a means to obtain a comparative analysis_between_tourism destinations_in_the_first and third world.
*Simulations:* Given_a network such as that_analyzed in_this work and its respective comprehensive characterization, it_would_be interesting to_perform simulations involving the addition or removal of connections,_in order to investigate effects of_communication failures as_well_as_the creation of new_partnerships.
*Inference of Growth Models:* The comprehensive_characterization of the Elba tourism destination_network in terms of structural and dynamical_features reported in this article has_paved the way to attempts_to obtain_growth models capable of reproducing_the observed structure,_possibly under_the effect of_the respective dynamics. For instance, after_starting with a_small random structure, new connections could_be_established while taking_into_account_regional proximity,_possibly involving the_path-regular_knitted network [@Costa_comp:2007]_to_interconnect the companies according to their_positions._Such growth models would allow a yet_more complete understanding of_tourism_destination systems.
Luciano da F._Costa thanks CNPq (308231/03-1) and_FAPESP (05/00587-5) for sponsorship.
---
abstract: 'A_simple statistical_model is_proposed, which considers the turbulent flow as a collection of localized_structures (eddies). The model successfully predicts_the transition to the_turbulent regime_at_high Reynolds numbers_and_shows agreement_with other known properties of turbulent flows._Comparison of_the assumptions underlying the model and_Navier-Stokes equation suggests that_the_driving force for the turbulent transition_is basically the tendency of the_system to occupy a statistically_dominant_state;_the instability of the flow_plays a role of the mechanism_for finding this_state.'
author:
- 'Sergei F. Chekmarev$^{1,2}$'
title: 'Driving force for_turbulent_transition: Dynamical instability or statistical preference?'
---
The_transition_from laminar to turbulent fluid flow,_originally_studied_by Reynolds in his seminal_work [@Reynolds1883], is still in focus_of many researchers. It is a very complex phenomenon,_which has a_variety of scenarios and is_generally_dependent_on the flow environment [@MoninYaglom; @LandauLifshitz_fluid_mech; @Lesieur]. In the simplest_cases, the_transition is related_to the dynamical instability of a laminar flow at high |
This percentage rises to 80 if core growth is very rapid. These results indicate that if pebble accretion driven core growth is vigourous, it may be able to destroy many of these otherwise bound protoplanets within their first few thousand years of life.
In the bottom panel of Figure \[fig:Cass\] we plot a histogram of core masses that are able to unbind H17 protoplanets in less than 1500 years. Using Equation \[eq:feedback\] we compared the total energy of the protoplanet with the total energy released due to core formation for the three different rates of core growth. The core masses are distributed between 1-25 $M_{\oplus}$ as expected from the analysis in Section \[sec:analytic\_fb\], the sub $10 M_{\oplus}$ cores are formed since many of the H17 protoplanets initially have lower binding energies than our 5 $M_J$ protoplanet. It is likely that in a self-consistent calculation more of the H17 protoplanets would be at risk of disruption since core feedback slows the rate of protoplanet collapse and therefore allows more time for the growth of larger cores. Further analysis of this process will require self-consistent simulations of protoplanet evolution coupled with core feedback models, we direct the reader to [@Nayakshin16a] and (Nayakshin submitted) for 1D examples of this.
These results have major implications for the final predicted population of GI protoplanets, provided massive rocky cores form before the protoplanets undergo H$_2$ dissociative collapse. The release of energy has the potential to destroy many GI protoplanets, leaving behind massive solid cores in their place. Further studies are needed to quantify the subsequent fate of these planets.
Super-Earth cores and other by-products of protoplanet disruption
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For the range of parameters considered in this paper, it seems that the critical core mass needed to trigger protoplanet disruption is roughly 5-30 $M_{\oplus}$. This is supported by the analytic estimates of core feedback in Section \[sec:analytic\_fb\]. There are two mechanisms that limit core growth. First, if the feedback luminosity is high, protoplanet disruption happens early and pebble accretion onto the core ends. In this case the subsequent core growth will be limited by the pebble isolation mass of $\sim 10-20{{\,{\rm M}_{\oplus}}}$, studied extensively in the CA field[^7] [@Morbid | This percentage rises to 80 if core growth is very rapid. These results bespeak that if pebble accretion drive core growth is vigourous, it may be able to destroy many of these differently bound protoplanets within their first few thousand years of animation.
In the bottom panel of Figure \[fig: Cass\ ] we plot a histogram of core mass that are able to unbind H17 protoplanets in less than 1500 years. Using Equation \[eq: feedback\ ] we compare the total energy of the protoplanet with the full department of energy released due to core constitution for the three different rates of kernel growth. The core masses are distributed between 1 - 25 $ M_{\oplus}$ as expect from the analysis in Section \[sec: analytic\_fb\ ], the sub $ 10 M_{\oplus}$ cores are formed since many of the H17 protoplanets initially experience lower binding energies than our 5 $ M_J$ protoplanet. It is likely that in a self - consistent calculation more of the H17 protoplanets would be at hazard of disruption since core feedback slows the rate of protoplanet collapse and therefore admit more time for the growth of larger cores. Further analysis of this process will require self - consistent simulations of protoplanet evolution match with core feedback models, we address the proofreader to [ @Nayakshin16a ] and (Nayakshin submitted) for 1D examples of this.
These results accept major implications for the final predicted population of GI protoplanets, provided massive rough cores form before the protoplanets undergo H$_2 $ dissociative collapse. The release of energy has the potential to destroy many GI protoplanets, leaving behind massive solid cores in their plaza. Further studies are necessitate to quantify the subsequent fate of these planets.
Super - Earth cores and other by - products of protoplanet dislocation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For the range of parameters considered in this newspaper, it seems that the critical core mass needed to trip protoplanet disruption is roughly 5 - 30 $ M_{\oplus}$. This is supported by the analytic estimates of core feedback in Section \[sec: analytic\_fb\ ]. There embody two mechanisms that restrict core increase. First, if the feedback luminosity is gamey, protoplanet disruption happens early and pebble accretion onto the core ends. In this case the subsequent kernel growth will be limit by the pebble isolation mass of $ \sim 10 - 20{{\,{\rm M}_{\oplus}}}$, studied extensively in the CA field[^7 ] [ @Morbid | Thls percentage rises to 80 lf core growth is very capid. Tgese resjlts indicate that if pebble axcretuon driven core growth is vigougous, it mqy bt able to destroy many of these lthexwmse bound protoklanets withhn their first fdw thousand years of life.
In the bottoi panel ov Figure \[fig:Cafs\] wt pjot z histogram of core masses that ars able uo unbind H17 protopkanets in less than 1500 years. Usijg Equation \[eq:feedhack\] we comkzreq the total evergy of the protoplangt with the total energy releasea due to core firnatlmn for the vhree qifferent rabvs of cmre groeth. The core msssxs aee distributed betweei 1-25 $M_{\oplus}$ as expecteq from tha cnalysis in Section \[swc:qnalyjic\_fb\], the wub $10 M_{\kpkua}$ cored ace formed sjnce many od the H17 protoplanetx ybitially have lower bynding energies than our 5 $M_J$ protoplaneu. It js likely that in a seld-consistent calculatiln more os the H17 protoplanets would be at risk of disruptimn siicd circ fedebwck slows the rate of protoplanet collapse anq tnegefore allows morc time for the groetj ps larger corer. Furtksr analysis of this orocess will require felf-vonsistent simulations of peotoplanet enolurion coupled with eore feedbacy mocels, ee direct the reader to [@Nayzkshin16a] and (Nayakshih submitted) for 1D exsm[les of ufis.
These results rave majoc impkicatiovs fpr the final preficted population of GI orotoklanetv, provided massive rocky cores form beforx the protoplsnats undergo H$_2$ dixsociative cojlapse. The relgase of euergy fas the ponential tm destroy mwny GI protopnwnets, leavinj behind iassuve wolid cufes in their pkace. Furtktr studies are needed to quaktify fhe subsequent yctt if these planeys.
Sjpew-Ewrvh cowas and other by-pfodjvts ow protokjaket distuption
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For the range of larameters consideteq in thiw paper, yt seems that the critical core mass nexded tp ttigger protoplanet disruption ia roughly 5-30 $M_{\jplus}$. This if suiporjed by the cnalytic estimates of core feedback in Sxction \[sec:analytic\_fb\]. Thwre are two mechanixks that limmt corq growth. Xirst, if the feedbacj luminosity is hlgh, protoplanet disrupfion hdppend early and pebble accretion onto the core ends. In this case the subsequebt corx drowth will be kimitvd yy che pebfle msulation mass of $\xim 10-20{{\,{\rm M}_{\oplus}}}$, studied extensiveuy in tha EA field[^7] [@Morbid | This percentage rises to 80 if core very These results that if pebble vigourous, may be able destroy many of otherwise bound protoplanets within their first thousand years of life. In the bottom panel of Figure \[fig:Cass\] we plot histogram of core masses that are able to unbind H17 protoplanets in less 1500 Using \[eq:feedback\] compared the total energy of the protoplanet with the total energy released due to core formation the three different rates of core growth. The masses are distributed between $M_{\oplus}$ as expected from the in \[sec:analytic\_fb\], the $10 cores formed since many the H17 protoplanets initially have lower binding energies than our 5 $M_J$ protoplanet. It is likely that a self-consistent of the protoplanets be risk of disruption feedback slows the rate of protoplanet allows more time for the growth of larger Further analysis this process will require self-consistent simulations protoplanet evolution coupled with core feedback models, we the reader to [@Nayakshin16a] and (Nayakshin submitted) for 1D examples of this. These results have for the final predicted of GI protoplanets, massive cores before protoplanets undergo dissociative collapse. The release of energy has the potential to destroy GI protoplanets, leaving behind massive solid cores in their place. are to quantify the fate of these planets. cores other by-products of protoplanet For range in paper, seems that the critical mass needed to trigger protoplanet is roughly 5-30 $M_{\oplus}$. analytic estimates of core feedback in Section \[sec:analytic\_fb\]. are two mechanisms that limit core growth. if the feedback luminosity is high, protoplanet disruption happens early and pebble onto the In this case the subsequent core growth will limited by the pebble mass of $\sim 10-20{{\,{\rm M}_{\oplus}}}$, studied extensively in the field[^7] | This percentage rises to 80 if coRe growth is Very rApiD. ThEsE resUlts Indicate that if PEbblE accretion driven core grOwth iS vIGourOUs, It may Be able tO DeSTRoy MaNy Of tHeSE oTherwIse Bound prOtoplanets WitHiN their first fEW tHousand yeaRs oF life.
In the boTtoM panel Of figURe \[fig:casS\] we plOt a hisTOgram oF core massEs THat are ABle to unBINd h17 proToplanets in less thAN 1500 yEArs. Using EquatiOn \[eq:feEdBAcK\] WE coMpaRed the totaL eNergy OF the proTOpLANEt wITh the total eneRgy released DUe tO core fOrMatIOn for tHe thrEe DIffErent rates oF corE growth. ThE core mASses are DIstribuTed betWeeN 1-25 $M_{\oPlus}$ AS eXpEctEd FRom THe AnaLYsiS in SectiOn \[SeC:analYtic\_FB\], THE sub $10 m_{\opLus}$ cOres aRe formed since ManY of tHE H17 pRotopLanetS iniTiAlly hAve lowEr binDiNg energies than oUr 5 $M_J$ ProtoplanEt. IT iS liKeLy thaT In a selF-coNsiStent caLculatiON moRe OF THe h17 protoplanets would Be AT RiSk of disrUption SInCe COre feedbAcK slOws tHE Rate oF proTOpLanet colLapse aND tHeRefore aLlOws morE tIme For The grOWth oF largeR cores. FuRther ANalysis of this pROcess will requIRe SELf-COnsiSteNt simulatioNs of PRotoPlanET eVolUTion cOupleD wITh COre feedback models, we DiRect thE readEr to [@Nayakshin16A] and (NayaksHIN SubmitteD) for 1d ExAMples of this.
TheSe resUlts have maJOr implicAtionS for the fInal prediCTEd populaTioN of gI pRotOPLaNets, provided mASSive RoCky coreS foRm beforE thE prOtoPlaNeTs undergo h$_2$ dissociAtIvE cOlLapSe. The RElease of EnErgY hAs tHe potENtial tO destRoy mAnY Gi ProToplaneTS, lEAVing BeHiNd maSsiVe Solid CoreS In tHeir plaCe. Further StuDIes aRe NeEded to qUantify the subSeQuent fate oF tHesE planeTS.
super-EarTh cores and other by-producTS of protOplAnet dIsruPtion
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For tHe rAnge of ParAMeters ConsidEred iN tHis PAPer, it SEEmS thAt The criticaL COre Mass nEeDed tO triggeR protoplanet disrupTIon Is roughly 5-30 $M_{\oplUs}$. THis iS SUpPorTEd BY thE aNAlyTIC estimates of corE feedback iN SECtIon \[sec:analYTic\_Fb\]. there arE two mecHanisMS that liMit core grOwth. First, If The fEEDbaCk luminosiTy is high, ProtoplanET disrUPtIon haPpeNs earlY aNd pEbble AccretIOn oNto thE core eNdS. In thiS case ThE subsequEnt core growth will be limiTed by tHe pebBle Isolation MasS Of $\sIm 10-20{{\,{\rm M}_{\opluS}}}$, stuDied extensIveLy iN the Ca fiELd[^7] [@MorBid | This percentage rises to80 if core grow thisve ry r apid . These result s ind icate that if pebble a ccret io n dri v en core growth is v igo ur ou s,it ma y beabl e to de stroy many of t hese otherwi s ebound prot opl anets within th eir fi rs t f e w tho usa nd ye ars of life.
In the b ot t om pan e l of Fi g u re \[f ig:Cass\] we plot ah istogram of co re mas se s t h a t a reable to un bi nd H1 7 protop l an e t s in less than 150 0 years. Us i ngEquati on \[ e q:feed back\ ]w e c ompared the tot al energy of th e protop l anet wi th the to tal ene r gy r ele as e d d u etoc ore formati on f or th e th r e e diff ere nt r atesof core growt h.Thec ore mass es ar e di st ribut ed bet ween1- 25 $M_{\oplus}$ asexpectedfro mthe a nalys i s in S ect ion \[sec: analyti c \_f b\ ] , th e sub $10 M_{\oplu s} $ co res areformed si nc e many of t heH17p r otopl anet s i nitially havel ow er bindin genergi es th anour 5 $M_J $ prot oplanet. It i s likely that i n a self-consi s te n t c a lcul ati on more oftheH 17 p roto p la net s woul d beat ri s k of disruption sin ce corefeedb ack slows the rate of p r o t oplanetcoll a ps e and therefore allo ws more ti m e for th e gro wth of l arger cor e s . Furthe r a nal ysi s o f th is process wi l l req ui re self -co nsisten t s imu lat ion sof protop lanet ev ol ut io ncou pledw ith core f eed ba ckmodel s , we d irect the r ea d erto [@Na y ak s h in16 a] a nd ( Nay ak shinsubm i tte d) for1D exampl eso f th is .
Theseresults havema jor implic at ion s fort h e finalpredicted population of GI prot opl anets , pr ovided ma ssi ve roc kyc ores f orm be foreth e p r o topla n e ts un de rgo H$_2$d i sso ciati ve col lapse.The release of ene r gyhas the poten tia l to d es tro y m a nyGI pro t o planets, leavin g behind m as s iv e solid co r esin theirplace.Furth e r studi es are ne eded to q ua ntif y the subsequen t fate o f these p l anets .
Super -Ea rth co re s a nd ot her by - pro ducts of pr ot oplane t dis ru ption
-- ----------------------- ------ ----- --- --------- --- - --- --------- -
F or the ran geofparam ete r s con side r ed in thispape r , it seem s t hat t he critical c o r e ma ss ne ede d to tr igge r protoplanet dis r uption is roug hly5 - 30$M_ { \opl us }$. This is su ppo rt e d by thean alytic esti mates of c o re fe edback in Se ction \ [ s ec : analyt ic\_ fb\ ]. Thereare t w o mecha ni sm s thatlimi tcore g rowth. Firs t , if the feedback lumi n o sityi s h igh,pr otoplan e t di sruption h appens earl y andpebb le ac cretion o nto th e c or e ends. In this case thesubsequ en t co regrowth wil l be li mite dbythe pebbl e is o la ti o n m assof $\ si m 10 -20{{\,{\ r m M}_{\o plu s }}}$, s tu die d extens i ve l y in the CA fi eld[^ 7 ] [@Morbid | This_percentage rises_to 80 if core_growth is_very_rapid. These_results_indicate that if_pebble accretion driven_core growth is vigourous,_it may be_able_to destroy many of these otherwise bound protoplanets within their first few thousand years_of_life.
In the_bottom_panel_of Figure \[fig:Cass\] we plot_a histogram of core masses_that are_able to unbind H17 protoplanets in less than_1500_years. Using Equation_\[eq:feedback\] we compared the total energy of the protoplanet_with the total energy released due_to core formation_for_the_three different rates of_core growth. The core masses are_distributed between 1-25 $M_{\oplus}$ as expected_from the analysis in Section \[sec:analytic\_fb\], the_sub $10 M_{\oplus}$ cores are formed_since many of the H17_protoplanets initially_have lower binding energies than_our 5 $M_J$_protoplanet. It_is likely that_in a self-consistent calculation more of_the H17 protoplanets_would be at risk of disruption_since_core feedback slows_the_rate_of protoplanet_collapse and therefore_allows_more time_for_the growth of larger cores. Further_analysis_of this process will require self-consistent simulations_of protoplanet evolution coupled_with_core feedback models, we_direct the reader to [@Nayakshin16a]_and (Nayakshin submitted) for 1D examples_of this.
These_results have_major implications for the final predicted population of GI protoplanets, provided_massive rocky cores form before the_protoplanets undergo H$_2$ dissociative_collapse. The_release_of energy has_the_potential to_destroy many GI protoplanets, leaving behind massive_solid cores_in their place. Further studies are_needed to quantify the_subsequent_fate of these planets.
Super-Earth cores and_other by-products of protoplanet disruption
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For the_range of parameters considered in_this_paper,_it seems that the critical_core mass needed to trigger protoplanet_disruption is roughly_5-30 $M_{\oplus}$. This is supported by the_analytic_estimates of core feedback in Section_\[sec:analytic\_fb\]._There are two mechanisms that limit_core_growth._First, if the feedback luminosity_is high, protoplanet disruption happens early_and pebble accretion onto the core ends. In this_case the subsequent_core growth will be limited_by_the_pebble isolation mass of $\sim 10-20{{\,{\rm M}_{\oplus}}}$, studied extensively in_the CA_field[^7] [@Morbid |
steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $G$. Let us elaborate on how to proceed by steps. If $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$ and $\mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the final step $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ by $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. However, we will see that this is not the case, i.e., the final step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ is invariant of strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\]). Observe that if $(H,K)$ is a strong Shoda pair of $G$, then $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on taking strong inductive chain: $H \leq G$.
[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite field of order $q$ and $ | steps, when $ (H, K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $ G$. Let us complicate on how to continue by steps. If $ (H, K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda couple of $ G$, $ H = H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive range from $ H$ to $ G$ and $ \mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H / K)$, set $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H, K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H, K),$$ $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K)={\rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{1}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugate ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H, K),$$ $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H, K) = { \rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{2}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugates ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K),$$ and ultimately $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H, K) = { \rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{n}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugates ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H, K).$$ Denote the concluding step $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H, K) $ by $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the definition of $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ depends on solid inductive chain from $ H$ to $ G$. However, we will visualize that this is not the case, i.e., the final measure $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ is invariant of strong inductive chain from $ H$ to $ G$ (learn Remark \[r1\ ]). Observe that if $ (H, K)$ is a strong Shoda pair of $ G$, then $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)= { e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ on taking potent inductive chain: $ H \leq G$.
[ \[t1\ ] ] { } Let $ \mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite field of order $ q$ and $ | stfps, when $(H,K)$ is a generallzed strong Shodc pair mf $G$. Lst us elxborate on how to proceed by sreps. Uf $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Sjoda paie of $T$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\lxs \cdots \leq H_{h}=N$ is c wtrong inductiye chain frmm $H$ to $G$ and $\kagheal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\matrcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \garepsilon_{\mathsal{C}}(N,H),$$ $$\vadvpwilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~tge~distiict~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatormame{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsiloj_{\matjcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\lathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) ={\rm~trw~sum~of~all~the~aistinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatornaje{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcau{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ cnd finally $$\vqreovilon_{\mathcao{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~divtinct~}H_{m}{\rm {\operatornake{-}} ronjygates~of~}\varepsilon_{\matical{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the sinal ste[ $\rarepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ vy $\majhfran{e}_{\magycau{C}}(G,G,K)$. Alparenhly, one thinka that the eefinition of $\mathftah{v}_{\kathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ sependf jn strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. Hmweber, we will see that thus is not the case, i.e., the finaj step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ is invariant of stronc indncgivt gmain drlm $H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\]). Observe that if $(H,K)$ is w surokg Shoda pair of $G$, then $\matnfgal{g}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\oathcal{C}}(G,G,K)$ on taking stronh inducjive cyain: $H \lez G$.
[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite fueld of ordeg $q$ qnd $ | steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong of Let us on how to is generalized strong Shoda of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong chain from $H$ to $G$ and $\mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the step $ $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. one thinks that the definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. we will see that this is not the i.e., the final step is invariant of strong inductive from to $G$ Remark Observe if $(H,K)$ is strong Shoda pair of $G$, then $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on taking strong inductive chain: $H \leq G$. [\[t1\]]{} $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be field of $q$ $ | steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized Strong ShodA pair Of $G$. let Us ElabOratE on how to proceeD By stEps. If $(H,K)$ is a generalized sTrong shODa paIR oF $G$, $H=H_{0}\lEq H_{1}\leq \cDOtS \LEq H_{N}=G$ Is A stRoNG iNductIve Chain frOm $H$ to $G$ and $\mAthCaL{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{Q}(h/K)$, Set $$\varepsiLon_{\Mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \vaRepSilon_{\mAtHcaL{c}}(H,K),$$ $$\vaRepSilon_{\MathcaL{c}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~tHe~sum~of~alL~tHE~distiNCt~}H_{1}{\rm {\opERAtOrnaMe{-}} conjugates~of~}\varEPsILon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\vArepsiLoN_{\MaTHCal{c}}^{(2)}(H,K) ={\Rm~the~sum~of~AlL~the~dIStinct~}H_{2}{\RM {\oPERAtoRName{-}} conjugateS~of~}\varepsilON_{\maThcal{C}}^{(1)}(h,K),$$ And FInally $$\VarepSiLOn_{\mAthcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rM~the~Sum~of~all~tHe~distINct~}H_{n}{\rm {\OPeratorName{-}} coNjuGatEs~of~}\VArEpSilOn_{\MAthCAl{c}}^{(n-1)}(H,k).$$ denOte the fiNaL sTep $\vaRepsILON_{\MathCal{c}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ By $\matHfrak{e}_{\mathcal{c}}(G,H,k)$. AppARenTly, onE thinKs thAt The deFinitiOn of $\mAtHfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,h,K)$ dePends on stRonG iNduCtIve chAIn from $h$ to $g$. HoWever, we Will see THat ThIS IS nOt the case, i.e., the finaL sTEP $\mAthfrak{e}_{\MathcaL{c}}(G,h,K)$ IS invariaNt Of sTronG INductIve cHAiN from $H$ to $g$ (see ReMArK \[r1\]). observe ThAt if $(H,K)$ Is A stRonG ShodA Pair Of $G$, theN $\mathfraK{e}_{\matHCal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcaL{c}}(G,H,K)$ on taking sTRoNG InDUctiVe cHain: $H \leq G$.
[\[t1\]]{} LEt $\maTHbb{F}_{Q}$ be a FInIte FIeld oF ordeR $q$ ANd $ | steps, when $(H,K)$ is ageneralize d str ong Sh od a pa ir o f $G$. Let use labo rate on how to proceed by s te p s. I f $ (H,K) $ is ag en e r ali ze dstr on g S hodapai r of $G $, $H=H_{0 }\l eq H_{1}\leq \ c do ts \leq H_ {n} =G$ is a str ong induc ti vec hainfro m $H$ to $G $ and $ \mathcal{ C} \ in \ma t hcal{C} _ { q} (H/K )$, set $$\vareps i lo n _{\mathcal{C}} ^{(0)} (H , K) = \v are psilon_{\m at hcal{ C }}(H,K) , $$ $ $ \va r epsilon_{\mat hcal{C}}^{( 1 )}( H,K)={ \r m~t h e~sum~ of~al l~ t he~ distinct~}H _{1} {\rm {\op erator n ame{-}} conjuga tes~of ~}\ var epsi l on _{ \ma th c al{ C }} ^{( 0 )}( H,K),$$$$ \v areps ilon _ { \ m athc al{ C}}^ {(2)} (H,K) ={\rm~ the ~sum ~ of~ all~t he~di stin ct ~}H_{ 2}{\rm {\op er atorname{-}} co njug ates~of~} \va re psi lo n_{\m a thcal{ C}} ^{( 1)}(H,K ),$$ an d fi na l l y $ $\varepsilon_{\mat hc a l {C }}^{(n)} (H,K)={ \r m ~the~sum ~o f~a ll~t h e ~dist inct ~ }H _{n}{\rm {\ope r at or name{-} }conjug at es~ of~ }\var e psil on_{\m athcal{C }}^{( n -1)}(H,K).$$ D e note the fina l s t e p$ \var eps ilon_{\math cal{ C }}^{ (n)} ( H, K)$ by $ \math fr a k{ e }_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H ,K )$. Ap paren tly, one thin ks that th e d efinitio n of $\ m athfrak{e}_{\m athca l{C}}(G,H, K )$ depen ds on stronginductive c hain fro m $ H$to$G$ . Ho wever, we wil l seeth at this is not th e c ase , i .e. ,the final step $\ ma th fr ak {e} _{\ma t hcal{C}} (G ,H, K) $ i s inv a riantof st rong i nd u cti ve chai n f r o m $H $to $G$ (s ee Rema rk \ [ r1\ ]). Obs erve that if $(H, K) $is a st rong Shoda pa ir of $G$, t he n $ \mathf r a k{e}_{\m athcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_ { \mathca l{C }}(G, H,K) $ on taki ngstrong in d uctive chain : $H\l eqG $ .
[\ [ t 1\ ]]{ }Let $\math b b {F} _{q}$ b e afinitefield of order $q$ and $ | steps,_when $(H,K)$_is a generalized strong_Shoda pair_of_$G$. Let_us_elaborate on how_to proceed by_steps. If $(H,K)$ is_a generalized strong_Shoda_pair of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive chain from_$H$_to $G$_and_$\mathcal{C}\in_\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$_$$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) _={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}}_conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$_Denote_the final step_$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ by $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the_definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong_inductive chain from_$H$_to_$G$. However, we will_see that this is not the_case, i.e., the final step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$_is invariant of strong inductive chain from_$H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\])._Observe that if $(H,K)$ is_a strong_Shoda pair of $G$, then_$\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on_taking strong_inductive chain: $H_\leq G$.
[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a_finite field of_order $q$ and $ |
to incorporate the special conditions then is solved with orthodox methods or the task is considered as it is and the solving methods are generalized. The most straightforward example for the first approach is the complex scaling method which has a long history [@cs]. In a recent nuclear three-body application [@atk] the back-rotation problem of this method is solved. The usage of the complex scaling method to CC problem sometimes requires slight extensions as e.g. when shadow poles are to be found [@csot93a].
A good and nowadays often used approach of the second kind is the series expansion of the wave function on an extended basis. The basis includes the bound states, selected resonance/virtual states as well as complex energy scattering states of the potential. The existence of such basis was proven by T. Berggren [@Be68]. Berggren basis were used in the solution of many-body shell model calculations [@2002IdBetan; @2002Michel], especially when weakly bound or unbound states of certain nuclei observed in radioactive beam facilities were to be described by Gamow shell model or complex energy shell model [@Mi09]. In certain applications [@Bet04; @ve89] it was shown that anti-bound states can also be included as basis states.
The application of the Berggren bases in some model means that the wave function of the studied system is expanded on this basis. The Berggren basis was used also in CC problems: the radial coupled HFB equations were solved with it [@mic08] and also the CC Lane equation describing isobaric analog states [@Bet08].
The aim of this paper is to show that in CC problem [*all poles*]{} of the S-matrix can be calculated with properly constructed Berggren basis. To this end we reproduce the results of an exactly solvable CC problem: the one with the Cox potential. This CC problem can be solved exactly [@1964Cox; @pup08; @spa06; @sam07] so there is no ambiguity in the location of the S-matrix poles. The analytic solution of the Cox potential offers a unique opportunity for testing the results of the numerical solution of the CC problem.
The paper is organized as follows. Section \[sec:cox\] describes the CC Cox problem and its analytic solution. In Section \[sec:berg\] we discuss how to use the Berggren basis for the solution of a CC problem. Here we discuss the main point of the paper: how to | to incorporate the special conditions then is solved with orthodox method or the undertaking is considered as it is and the solving methods are generalize. The most straightforward exercise for the beginning approach is the complex scaling method acting which have a farseeing history [ @cs ]. In a recent nuclear three - body application [ @atk ] the back - rotation trouble of this method is solved. The use of the complex scaling method to CC trouble sometimes requires slight extensions as for example when shadow poles are to be found [ @csot93a ].
A good and nowadays often use approach of the second kind is the series expansion of the wave function on an extended basis. The footing includes the bound states, selected resonance / virtual states equally well as complex department of energy break up states of the potential. The existence of such basis was proven by T. Berggren [ @Be68 ]. Berggren basis were practice in the solution of many - soundbox shell model calculations [ @2002IdBetan; @2002Michel ], particularly when weakly bound or unbound states of certain nucleus watch in radioactive beam facilities were to be trace by Gamow shell model or complex energy shell model [ @Mi09 ]. In certain application [ @Bet04; @ve89 ] it was shown that anti - bound states can also be include as basis state of matter.
The application of the Berggren bases in some model means that the wave function of the studied arrangement is expanded on this basis. The Berggren basis was use also in CC problems: the radial coupled HFB equality were solved with it [ @mic08 ] and also the CC Lane equality describing isobaric analog states [ @Bet08 ].
The aim of this composition is to show that in milliliter problem [ * all poles * ] { } of the S - matrix can be calculated with by rights constructed Berggren basis. To this end we reproduce the results of an exactly solvable CC problem: the one with the Cox potential. This CC problem can be solved precisely [ @1964Cox; @pup08; @spa06; @sam07 ] so there is no ambiguity in the localization of the S - matrix poles. The analytic solution of the Cox electric potential offers a unique opportunity for testing the results of the numerical solution of the CC problem.
The paper is organized as follows. Section \[sec: cox\ ] describe the CC Cox trouble and its analytic solution. In Section \[sec: berg\ ] we discuss how to use the Berggren basis for the solution of a CC problem. Here we discuss the main detail of the paper: how to | to incorporate the special conditions theu is sonved wjth orthudox methods or the task is ronsuderee as it is and the solxing methlds are tenecalized. The most straighbyorwadf excm'le for the firxt approacv is the complax sealing method which has a long histowy [@cs]. Im w recent nuclewr tnwee-bkdy application [@atk] the back-rotatikn probnem of this mrthod is solved. The usage lf tje complex scaling method to XC pwiblem sometioes requirts slight exjensions as e.g. when shadow poles are co be found [@cwot93w].
D good and iowadajs often used approacv of thr second kind ls thx seeies expansion of the wave function on wn extendad basis. The basis unxludev tha bojbd rtaues, sslectef rxsonance/virfual states as well as complex egvtgy scatterihg staeef of the potential. The existence of sucv bzsis was proven by T. Beeggren [@Be68]. Berggren badis were tsed in the solution of many-body shell model calcglatikvs [@2002NeBetav; @2002Mlchel], especially when weakly bound or unbound atstvs of certain nucjei observec ln tadioactive bexm facnmifies were to be dedcribed by Gqmow shelj mocel or complex energy shell model [@Mi09]. In xertain applicatious [@Bet04; @ve89] it was showm that anti-bound states can also be influded as casis states.
The xppkiwation of the Berggren basqs in somx modzl means thaj the wwve functiln of the studied system is erpandad on this basis. The Berggren basis was used also in CC psobnems: the radisl coupled HFF equations wete solved with it [@mic08] ans also vhe CC Lane qquation descslbing isobarmc analog stares [@Vet08].
The xkm of this paprr is to show that un CC problem [*all ioles*]{} kf the S-matrix ecn be calculated eitf pwoierky wonstructed Tergerev basir. To this ekd de rrproduce the results of zn exactly solvablr GC problen: the onq with the Coc potential. This CF proulem cen be xolded exactly [@1964Cox; @pup08; @spa06; @sam07] so there is no ambiguity ig thc losation of che S-matrix poles. The analytic solution if the Cox potentiql offers a unique pkportunity foc testyng the rasults of the numerixal solution of tme CC problem.
The paper is orcanizfd as follows. Section \[sec:cox\] describes the CC Cox problem and its analytic solutmog. In Sectioh \[sev:berg\] wz dnscuss row vo use the Berggrem basis for the solution of a CR problem. Vexe we discuss the main point pf the paper: hod to | to incorporate the special conditions then is orthodox or the is considered as methods generalized. The most example for the approach is the complex scaling method has a long history [@cs]. In a recent nuclear three-body application [@atk] the problem of this method is solved. The usage of the complex scaling method CC sometimes slight as e.g. when shadow poles are to be found [@csot93a]. A good and nowadays often used of the second kind is the series expansion the wave function on extended basis. The basis includes bound selected resonance/virtual as as energy scattering states the potential. The existence of such basis was proven by T. Berggren [@Be68]. Berggren basis were used the solution shell model [@2002IdBetan; especially weakly bound or of certain nuclei observed in radioactive to be described by Gamow shell model or energy shell [@Mi09]. In certain applications [@Bet04; @ve89] was shown that anti-bound states can also be as basis states. The application of the Berggren bases in some model means that the of the studied system expanded on this The basis used in CC the radial coupled HFB equations were solved with it [@mic08] and the CC Lane equation describing isobaric analog states [@Bet08]. The this is to show in CC problem [*all of S-matrix can be calculated constructed basis. we the of an exactly solvable problem: the one with the potential. This CC problem @pup08; @spa06; @sam07] so there is no ambiguity the location of the S-matrix poles. The solution of the Cox potential offers a unique opportunity for testing the of the of the CC problem. The paper is organized follows. Section \[sec:cox\] describes CC Cox problem and its analytic solution. In Section we how to the Berggren basis the solution of CC problem. Here the main of paper: | to incorporate the special coNditions thEn is sOlvEd wItH ortHodoX methods or the tASk is Considered as it is and the SolviNg MEthoDS aRe genEralizeD. thE MOst StRaIghTfORwArd exAmpLe for thE first apprOacH iS the complex sCAlIng method wHicH has a long hisTorY [@cs]. In a ReCenT NucleAr tHree-bOdy appLIcatioN [@atk] the baCk-ROtatioN Problem OF ThIs meThod is solved. The usAGe OF the complex scaLing meThOD tO cc prOblEm sometimeS rEquirES slight EXtENSIonS As e.g. when shadoW poles are to BE foUnd [@csoT93a].
a goOD and noWadayS oFTen Used approacH of tHe second kInd is tHE series EXpansioN of the WavE fuNctiON oN aN exTeNDed BAsIs. THE baSis incluDeS tHe bouNd stATES, SeleCteD resOnancE/virtual stateS as Well AS coMplex EnergY scaTtEring States Of the PoTential. The existEnce Of such basIs wAs ProVeN by T. BERggren [@be68]. BErgGren basIs were uSEd iN tHE SOlUtion of many-body sheLl MODeL calculaTions [@2002IDbeTaN; @2002michel], esPeCiaLly wHEN weakLy boUNd Or unbounD stateS Of CeRtain nuClEi obseRvEd iN raDioacTIve bEam facIlities wEre to BE described by GaMOw shell model oR CoMPLeX EnerGy sHell model [@Mi09]. in ceRTain ApplICaTioNS [@Bet04; @vE89] it waS sHOwN That anti-bound states CaN also bE inclUded as basis stAtes.
The appLICAtion of tHe BeRGgREn bases in some mOdel mEans that thE Wave funcTion oF the studIed system IS Expanded On tHis BasIs. THE beRggren basis waS USed aLsO in CC prOblEms: the rAdiAl cOupLed hFb equationS were solVeD wItH iT [@miC08] and aLSo the CC LAnE eqUaTioN descRIbing iSobarIc anAlOg STatEs [@Bet08].
ThE AiM OF thiS pApEr is To sHoW that In CC PRobLem [*all pOles*]{} of the s-maTRix cAn Be CalculaTed with properLy ConstructeD BErgGren baSIS. To this eNd we reproduce the results OF an exacTly SolvaBle Cc problem: tHe oNe with The cOx poteNtial. THis CC PrOblEM Can be SOLvEd eXaCtly [@1964Cox; @pup08; @SPA06; @saM07] so thErE is nO ambiguIty in the location of THe S-Matrix poles. ThE anAlytIC SoLutIOn OF thE COX poTENtial offers a uniQue opportuNiTY fOr testing tHE reSuLts of thE numeriCal soLUtion of The CC probLem.
The papEr Is orGANizEd as followS. Section \[Sec:cox\] desCRibes THe cC Cox ProBlem anD iTs aNalytIc soluTIon. in SecTion \[seC:bErg\] we dIscusS hOw to use tHe Berggren basis for the soLution Of a CC ProBlem. Here wE diSCusS the main pOint Of the paper: How To | to incorporate the specia l conditio ns th enisso lved wit h orthodox met h odsor the task is conside red a si t is an d the solvin g m e t hod sar e g en e ra lized . T he most straightf orw ar d example fo r t he first a ppr oach is thecom plex s ca lin g meth odwhich has a long h istory [@ cs ] . In a recentn u cl earthree-body applic a ti o n [@atk] the b ack-ro ta t io n pro ble m of thisme thodi s solve d .T h e us a ge of the com plex scalin g me thod t oCCp roblem some ti m esrequires sl ight extensio ns ase .g. whe n shadow poles ar e t o be fo un d [ @c s ot9 3 a] .
A go od and n ow ad ays o ften u s e d ap pro achof th e second kind is the ser ies e xpans ionof thewave f uncti on on an extended bas is. The b asi sinc lu des t h e boun d s tat es, sel ected r e son an c e / vi rtual states as we ll a scomplexenergy sc at t ering st at esof t h e pote ntia l .The exis tenceo fsu ch basi swas pr ov enbyT. Be r ggre n [@Be 68]. Ber ggren basis were use d in the solut i on o fm any- bod y shell mod el c a lcul atio n s[@2 0 02IdB etan; @ 2 00 2 Michel], especially w hen we aklybound or unbo und states o f certain nuc l ei observed in ra dioac tive beamf acilitie s wer e to bedescribed b y Gamowshe llmod elo r c omplex energy s hell m odel [@ Mi0 9]. Incer tai n a ppl ic ations [@ Bet04; @ ve 89 ]it wa s sho w n that a nt i-b ou ndstate s can a lso b e in cl ud e d a s basis st a t es.
T he app lic at ion o f th e Be rggrenbases insom e mod el m eans th at the wave f un ction of t he st udieds y stem isexpanded on this basis. The Ber ggr en ba siswas usedals o in C C p r oblems : theradia lcou p l ed HF B eq uat io ns were so l v edwithit [@m ic08] a nd also the CC Lan e eq uation descri bin g is o b ar ica na l ogst a tes [ @Bet08].
The a im of this p a pe r is to sh o w t ha t in CC proble m [*a l l poles *]{} of t he S-matr ix can b e c alculatedwith pro perly con s truct e dBergg ren basis .Tothisend we rep roduc e there sultsof an e xactly s olvable CC problem: the one w ith t heCox poten tia l . T his CC pr oble m can be s olv edexact ly[ @1964 Cox; @p up0 8 ; @sp a06; @sam07] s o t her e is no ambigui t y inthe l oca t ion of the S-matrix poles.T he analytic so luti o n of th e Cox p otential offer s a u n i que oppo rt unity for t esting t he resul ts ofthe nu merical s ol u tion o f th e C C problem .
Th e paperis o r ganize d as f ollows . Sect i on \ [ s ec:cox\] describ es th e CC Co x pr oblem a nd itsa naly tic soluti on. In Sect ion \ [sec :berg \] we d is cuss h owto use the B e rggren ba sis f or theso luti onof a C C pr o b lem.Here w e d iscuss th e ma i npo i ntof t he pa pe r: h ow to | to_incorporate the_special conditions then is_solved with_orthodox_methods or_the_task is considered_as it is_and the solving methods_are generalized. The_most_straightforward example for the first approach is the complex scaling method which has a_long_history [@cs]._In_a_recent nuclear three-body application [@atk]_the back-rotation problem of this_method is_solved. The usage of the complex scaling method_to_CC problem sometimes_requires slight extensions as e.g. when shadow poles are_to be found [@csot93a].
A good and_nowadays often used_approach_of_the second kind is_the series expansion of the wave_function on an extended basis. The_basis includes the bound states, selected resonance/virtual_states as well as complex energy_scattering states of the potential._The existence_of such basis was proven_by T. Berggren_[@Be68]. Berggren_basis were used_in the solution of many-body shell_model calculations [@2002IdBetan;_@2002Michel], especially when weakly bound or_unbound_states of certain_nuclei_observed_in radioactive_beam facilities were_to_be described_by_Gamow shell model or complex energy_shell_model [@Mi09]. In certain applications [@Bet04; @ve89]_it was shown that_anti-bound_states can also be_included as basis states.
The application_of the Berggren bases in some_model means_that the_wave function of the studied system is expanded on this basis._The Berggren basis was used also_in CC problems: the_radial coupled_HFB_equations were solved_with_it [@mic08]_and also the CC Lane equation describing_isobaric analog_states [@Bet08].
The aim of this paper_is to show that_in_CC problem [*all poles*]{} of the_S-matrix can be calculated with properly_constructed Berggren basis. To this_end_we_reproduce the results of an_exactly solvable CC problem: the one_with the Cox_potential. This CC problem can be solved_exactly_[@1964Cox; @pup08; @spa06; @sam07] so there_is_no ambiguity in the location of_the_S-matrix_poles. The analytic solution of_the Cox potential offers a unique_opportunity for testing the results of the numerical solution_of the CC_problem.
The paper is organized as_follows._Section \[sec:cox\]_describes the CC Cox problem and its analytic solution. In_Section \[sec:berg\]_we discuss how_to use the Berggren basis for the solution of a_CC problem. Here we discuss the main_point of the paper: how to |
As one can check easily, one cannot obtain an exact closed set of dynamical equations, since the time derivatives of two-operator products involve three-operator products, whose time derivatives contain terms being the products of four operators, etc. Because of this hierarchy, we have to restrict ourselves to expectation values and – at some point – introduce a factorization that is based on physical considerations.
The simplest Heisenberg equations of motion read: $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_x&=&\omega_0 \sigma_y, \label{der1}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_y&=&-\omega_0 \sigma_x+\sigma_z \left[\Omega(t)+\sum_n \Omega_n \left(a_n+a_n^{\dagger}\right)\right], \label{der2}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_z&=&-\sigma_y \left[ \Omega(t) + \sum_n \Omega_n (a_n+a_n^{\dagger})\right], \label{der3}\\
\frac{d}{dt}a_n&=&-i\left(\tilde{\omega}_n a_n+\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\sigma_x\right),\label{der4} \\
\frac{d}{dt}N_n&=&\frac{d}{dt} a_n^{\dagger}a_n= i\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\left(a_n-a_n^{\dagger}\right)\sigma_x \label{der5}.
\label{Heis}\end{aligned}$$ One can assume already at this point that the expectation values of the products of atomic an field operators factorize (e.g., $\langle\sigma_z a_n\rangle=\langle\sigma_z\rangle \langle a_n\rangle$), but in this case the influence of the photon number operators on the atomic system’s time evolution – which should be weak – is exactly zero. Additionally, since the photon annihilation operators’ dynamics are governed by a “classical” quantity (the expectation value of the dipole moment), the resulting photon statistics is necessarily Poissonian (i.e., the high harmonic modes are in coherent states).
![Central panel: the time evolution of the expectation values of the photon number operators $\langle N_n \rangle$ as a function of the frequency of the modes | As one can check easily, one cannot obtain an exact shut hardening of dynamical equations, since the meter derivative of two - operator products necessitate three - hustler products, whose time derivatives contain terms being the product of four operators, etc. Because of this hierarchy, we have to qualify ourselves to expectation values and – at some point – introduce a factorization that is based on physical considerations.
The simplest Heisenberg equation of motion read: $ $ \begin{aligned }
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_x&=&\omega_0 \sigma_y, \label{der1}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_y&=&-\omega_0 \sigma_x+\sigma_z \left[\Omega(t)+\sum_n \Omega_n \left(a_n+a_n^{\dagger}\right)\right ], \label{der2}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_z&=&-\sigma_y \left [ \Omega(t) + \sum_n \Omega_n (a_n+a_n^{\dagger})\right ], \label{der3}\\
\frac{d}{dt}a_n&=&-i\left(\tilde{\omega}_n a_n+\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\sigma_x\right),\label{der4 } \\
\frac{d}{dt}N_n&=&\frac{d}{dt } a_n^{\dagger}a_n= i\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\left(a_n - a_n^{\dagger}\right)\sigma_x \label{der5 }.
\label{Heis}\end{aligned}$$ One can assume already at this point that the arithmetic mean values of the products of atomic an field operator factorize (e.g., $ \langle\sigma_z a_n\rangle=\langle\sigma_z\rangle \langle a_n\rangle$), but in this case the influence of the photon number operators on the atomic arrangement ’s time evolution – which should be weak – is exactly zero. Additionally, since the photon annihilation operators ’ dynamics are governed by a “ classical ” quantity (the expectation value of the dipole moment), the resulting photon statistics is necessarily Poissonian (i.e., the high harmonic modes are in coherent state).
! [ Central panel: the prison term development of the arithmetic mean values of the photon number operator $ \langle N_n \rangle$ as a affair of the frequency of the modes | As one can check easily, ont cannot obtain au exact closes set of dynamical equations, since tie tume dtgivatives of two-operagor produbts involce tiree-operator provhcts, whose tijc dernvetives contain jerms being dhe products ox wobr operators, etc. Because of this hiewarchy, ee have to restryct ptrsemnew to expectation values and – zt some point – introcuce a factorization that ls bwsed on physical clnsideratiobs.
Thq simplest Heksenberg equations of jotion read: $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dt}\rigma_r&=&\omega_0 \sigmq_y, \lahgl{der1}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\wigma_j&=&-\omega_0 \sigma_x+\sigma_z \laft[\Omegs(t)+\sum_n \Omega_n \kefv(a_n+a_b^{\dagger}\right)\right], \labxl{der2}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_z&=&-\sidma_y \left[ \Ojega(t) + \sum_n \Omega_b (q_n+a_n^{\ddgges})\rigfr], \lxbem{dxr3}\\
\fdac{d}{dt}w_n&=&-i\meft(\tilde{\ojega}_n a_n+\frax{\Omega_n}{2}\sigma_x\right),\lsbqo{der4} \\
\frac{d}{dt}N_h&=&\frac{d}{qt} a_n^{\dagger}a_n= i\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\left(a_n-a_n^{\dagger}\richt)\aigma_x \label{der5}.
\label{Heiw}\end{aligned}$$ One can adsume alrqady at this point that the expectation values of the 'ruduebf if atomic an field operators factorize (e.g., $\langlq\aibms_z a_n\rangle=\lannle\sigma_z\rangle \lamgpe w_n\rangle$), but kn this czse the influence lf the khoton number okeratprs on the atomic system’s tume evolutiou – qhich should be weck – is exactuy zgro. Adcitionally, since the phuton annihilatiln operatkfs’ dynamics are eovvrneg by a “classical” quantity (ehe expecvatiou value uf tne dipjle moment), the vasulting photon stwtistncs iv necessarlly Poissonian (i.e., the high harmonic modes are it cmherent ftatex).
![Central panej: the time evokution jf thd expectatpon valuev of the phjton number o[grators $\langlx N_n \rangje$ aw a dunctiov of the frequemcy of thv iodew | As one can check easily, one cannot exact set of equations, since the involve products, whose time contain terms being products of four operators, etc. Because this hierarchy, we have to restrict ourselves to expectation values and – at point – introduce a factorization that is based on physical considerations. The simplest equations motion $$\begin{aligned} \sigma_y, \label{der1}\\ \frac{d}{dt}\sigma_y&=&-\omega_0 \sigma_x+\sigma_z \left[\Omega(t)+\sum_n \Omega_n \left(a_n+a_n^{\dagger}\right)\right], \label{der2}\\ \frac{d}{dt}\sigma_z&=&-\sigma_y \left[ \Omega(t) + \sum_n \Omega_n (a_n+a_n^{\dagger})\right], \label{der3}\\ a_n+\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\sigma_x\right),\label{der4} \\ \frac{d}{dt}N_n&=&\frac{d}{dt} a_n^{\dagger}a_n= i\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\left(a_n-a_n^{\dagger}\right)\sigma_x \label{der5}. \label{Heis}\end{aligned}$$ One assume already at this that the expectation values of products atomic an operators (e.g., a_n\rangle=\langle\sigma_z\rangle \langle a_n\rangle$), in this case the influence of the photon number operators on the atomic system’s time evolution – should be is exactly Additionally, the annihilation operators’ dynamics by a “classical” quantity (the expectation dipole moment), the resulting photon statistics is necessarily (i.e., the harmonic modes are in coherent states). panel: the time evolution of the expectation values the photon number operators $\langle N_n \rangle$ as a function of the frequency of the | As one can check easily, one canNot obtain aN exacT clOseD sEt of DynaMical equations, SInce The time derivatives of twO-operAtOR proDUcTs invOlve thrEE-oPERatOr PrOduCtS, WhOse tiMe dErivatiVes contain TerMs Being the prodUCtS of four opeRatOrs, etc. BecausE of This hiErArcHY, we haVe tO restRict ouRSelves To expectaTiON valueS And – at soME PoInt – iNtroduce a factorizATiON that is based on PhysicAl COnSIDerAtiOns.
The simpLeSt HeiSEnberg eQUaTIONs oF Motion read: $$\begIn{aligned}
\frAC{d}{dT}\sigma_X&=&\oMegA_0 \Sigma_y, \Label{DeR1}\\
\FraC{d}{dt}\sigma_y&=&-\oMega_0 \Sigma_x+\sigMa_z \lefT[\omega(t)+\sUM_n \Omega_N \left(a_N+a_n^{\DagGer}\rIGhT)\rIghT], \lABel{DEr2}\\
\FraC{D}{dt}\Sigma_z&=&-\siGmA_y \Left[ \OMega(T) + \SUM_N \OmeGa_n (A_n+a_n^{\DaggeR})\right], \label{deR3}\\
\frAc{d}{dT}A_n&=&-i\Left(\tIlde{\oMega}_N a_N+\frac{\omega_n}{2}\Sigma_X\rIght),\label{der4} \\
\fraC{d}{dt}n_n&=&\frac{d}{dt} A_n^{\dAgGer}A_n= I\frac{\oMega_n}{2}\lEft(A_n-a_N^{\dagger}\Right)\siGMa_x \LaBEL{DeR5}.
\label{Heis}\end{alignEd}$$ oNE cAn assume AlreadY At ThIS point thAt The ExpeCTAtion ValuES oF the prodUcts of AToMiC an fielD oPeratoRs FacTorIze (e.g., $\LAnglE\sigma_Z a_n\ranglE=\langLE\sigma_z\rangle \lANgle a_n\rangle$), bUT iN THiS Case The Influence of The pHOton NumbER oPerATors oN the aToMIc SYstem’s time evolution – WhIch shoUld be Weak – is exactly Zero. AdditiONALly, since The pHOtON annihilation oPeratOrs’ dynamicS Are goverNed by A “classicAl” quantitY (THe expectAtiOn vAluE of THE dIpole moment), thE REsulTiNg photoN stAtisticS is NecEssAriLy poissoniaN (i.e., the hiGh HaRmOnIc mOdes aRE in coherEnT stAtEs).
![CEntraL Panel: tHe timE evoLuTiON of The expeCTaTIOn vaLuEs Of thE phOtOn numBer oPEraTors $\lanGle N_n \rangLe$ aS A funCtIoN of the fRequency of the MoDes | As one can check easily,one cannot obta inanex actclos ed set of dyna m ical equations, since thetimede r ivat i ve s oftwo-ope r at o r pr od uc tsin v ol ve th ree -operat or product s,wh ose time der i va tives cont ain terms being th e prod uc tso f fou r o perat ors, e t c. Bec ause of t hi s hiera r chy, we h av e to restrict ourselv e st o expectationvalues a n d– atsom e point –in trodu c e a fac t or i z a tio n that is base d on physic a l c onside ra tio n s.
Th e sim pl e stHeisenbergequa tions ofmotion read: $ $ \begin{ aligne d}\fr ac{d } {d t} \si gm a _x& = &\ ome g a_0 \sigma_ y, \ label {der 1 } \ \
\fr ac{ d}{d t}\si gma_y&=&-\ome ga_ 0 \s i gma _x+\s igma_ z \l ef t[\Om ega(t) +\sum _n \Omega_n \left (a_n +a_n^{\da gge r} \ri gh t)\ri g ht], \ lab el{ der2}\\
\frac{ d }{d t} \ s i gm a_z&=&-\sigma_y \l ef t [ \ Omega(t) + \su m _n \ O mega_n ( a_ n+a _n^{ \ d agger })\r i gh t], \lab el{der 3 }\ \\frac{d }{ dt}a_n &= &-i \le ft(\t i lde{ \omega }_n a_n+ \frac { \Omega_n}{2}\s i gma_x\right), \ la b e l{ d er4} \\
\frac{d}{d t}N_ n &=&\ frac { d} {dt } a_n^ {\dag ge r }a _ n= i\frac{\Omega_n} {2 }\left (a_n- a_n^{\dagger} \right)\si g m a _x \labe l{de r 5} .
\label{Heis}\ end{a ligned}$$O ne can a ssume already at thisp o int that th e e xpe cta t i on values of th e prod uc ts of a tom ic an f iel d o per ato rs factoriz e (e.g., $ \l an gl e\s igma_ z a_n\ran gl e=\ la ngl e\sig m a_z\ra ngle\lan gl ea _n\ rangle$ ) ,b u t in t hi s ca seth e inf luen c e o f the p hoton num ber oper at or s on th e atomic syst em ’s time ev ol uti on – w h i ch shoul d be weak – is exactlyz ero. Ad dit ional ly,since the ph oton a nni h ilatio n oper ators ’dyn a m ics a r e g ove rn ed by a “c l a ssi cal”qu anti ty (the expectation value ofthe dipole mo men t),t h eres u lt i ngph o ton s tatistics is ne cessarilyPo i ss onian (i.e . , t he high h armonic mode s are in coherent states).
![Ce n t ral panel: th e time e volutiono f the ex pecta tio n valu es of thephoton num ber o perato rs $\lan gle N _n \rangle $ as a function of thefreque ncy o f t he modes | As_one can_check easily, one cannot_obtain an_exact_closed set_of_dynamical equations, since_the time derivatives_of two-operator products involve_three-operator products, whose_time_derivatives contain terms being the products of four operators, etc. Because of this hierarchy,_we_have to_restrict_ourselves_to expectation values and –_at some point – introduce_a factorization_that is based on physical considerations.
The simplest Heisenberg_equations_of motion read:_$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_x&=&\omega_0 \sigma_y, \label{der1}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_y&=&-\omega_0 \sigma_x+\sigma_z \left[\Omega(t)+\sum_n \Omega_n \left(a_n+a_n^{\dagger}\right)\right], \label{der2}\\
\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_z&=&-\sigma_y \left[_\Omega(t) + \sum_n \Omega_n (a_n+a_n^{\dagger})\right], \label{der3}\\
\frac{d}{dt}a_n&=&-i\left(\tilde{\omega}_n_a_n+\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\sigma_x\right),\label{der4} \\
\frac{d}{dt}N_n&=&\frac{d}{dt} a_n^{\dagger}a_n=_i\frac{\Omega_n}{2}\left(a_n-a_n^{\dagger}\right)\sigma_x_\label{der5}.
\label{Heis}\end{aligned}$$_One can assume already_at this point that the expectation_values of the products of atomic_an field operators factorize (e.g., $\langle\sigma_z a_n\rangle=\langle\sigma_z\rangle_\langle a_n\rangle$), but in this case_the influence of the photon_number operators_on the atomic system’s time_evolution – which_should be_weak – is_exactly zero. Additionally, since the photon_annihilation operators’ dynamics_are governed by a “classical” quantity_(the_expectation value of_the_dipole_moment), the_resulting photon statistics_is_necessarily Poissonian_(i.e.,_the high harmonic modes are in_coherent_states).
![Central panel: the time evolution of the_expectation values of the_photon_number operators $\langle N_n_\rangle$ as a function of_the frequency of the modes |
0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.996 3817,0.792 2913) (1. 029 03 15,0 .786 6843)(1.094331 2 ,0.7 756631)(1.2249305,0.75 43668 )( 1 .486 1 29 2,0.7 145679) ( 1. 5 0 245 41 ,0 .71 21 9 7) (1.51 877 9,0.709 8393)(1.55 142 89 ,0.7051629)( 1 .6 167285,0.6 959 638)(1.74732 79, 0.6781 60 9)( 2 .0085 266 ,0.64 47885) ( 2.0237 696,0.642 92 7 8)(2.0 3 90127,0 . 6 41 0762 )(2.0694989,0.637 4 00 5 )(2.1304713,0. 630156 9) ( 2. 2 5 241 6,0 .6160884)( 2. 49630 5 5,0.589 5 31 6 ) ( 2.5 1 15486,0.58793 82)(2.52679 1 7,0 .58635 24 )(2 . 557277 9,0.5 83 2 03) (2.6182502, 0.57 69927)(2. 740195 , 0.56491 5 5)(2.98 40845, 0.5 420 593) ( 2. 99 902 85 , 0.5 4 07 124 ) (3. 0139726, 0. 53 93713 )(3. 0 4 3 8 608, 0.5 3670 71)(3 .1036371,0.53 144 86)( 3 .22 31898 ,0.52 1204 2) (3.46 22951, 0.501 74 91)(3.4772392,0 .500 5768)(3.4 921 83 3,0 .4 99409 5 )(3.52 207 15, 0.49708 95)(3.5 8 184 78 , 0 . 49 25079)(3.7014005,0 .4 8 3 57 19)(3.94 05058, 0 .4 66 5 625)(3.9 56 716 5,0. 4 6 54491 )(3. 9 72 9272,0.4 643405 ) (4 .0 053486, 0. 462138 )( 4.0 701 914,0 . 4577 901)(4 .1998771 ,0.44 9 3175)(4.459248 4 ,0.4332173)(4 . 47 5 4 59 1 ,0.4 32 | 0.9800568,0.7951193)(0.9963817,0.7922913)(1.0290315,0.7866843)(1.0943312,0.7756631)(1.2249305,0.7543668)(1.4861292,0.7145679)(1.5024541,0.712197)(1.518779,0.7098393)(1.5514289,0.7051629)(1.6167285,0.6959638)(1.7473279,0.6781609)(2.0085266,0.6447885)(2.0237696,0.6429278)(2.0390127,0.6410762)(2.0694989,0.6374005)(2.1304713,0.6301569)(2.252416,0.6160884)(2.4963055,0.5895316)(2.5115486,0.5879382)(2.5267917,0.5863524)(2.5572779,0.583203)(2.6182502,0.5769927)(2.740195,0.5649155)(2.9840845,0.5420593)(2.9990285,0.5407124)(3.0139726,0.5393713)(3.0438608,0.5367071)(3.1036371,0.5314486)(3.2231898,0.5212042)(3.4622951,0.5017491)(3.4772392,0.5005768)(3.4921833,0.4994095)(3.5220715,0.4970895)(3.5818478,0.4925079)(3.7014005,0.4835719)(3.9405058,0.4665625)(3.9567165,0.4654491)(3.9729272,0.4643405)(4.0053486,0.462138)(4.0701914,0.4577901)(4.1998771,0.4493175)(4.4592484,0.4332173)(4.4754591,0.432 |
$ omits the partitions obtained from $S$ by amalgamating adjacent parts of odd size, so that these edges may be regarded as removed or “clipped”. This is illustrated in figure \[clippedcube.fig\], which should be compared with figure 2 of [@graphs03 p. 885]. We note that ${\partial^\lambda}$ and ${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ co-incide if each entry of $S$ and $\mu_a(S)$ have size at most three, which holds for the top two chain groups of the complex. We will use this fact to calculate the top integral homology groups of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ and [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}. The distinction between ${\partial^\lambda}$ and ${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ occurs for the first time in the three dimensional clipped cube complex and can be seen in figure \[clippedcube.fig\].
An understanding of the clipped cube complex allows us to calculate the rational homology of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductively, using the long exact sequence of the pair $({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$, and we pass to an understanding of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}$ using the long exact sequence of the pair $({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$. Our tool in doing so is the observation that the natural correspondence $\tilde{S}\leftrightarrow S$ between the tilded cells of [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{} and the cells of [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} has the following algebraic consequence:
The spaces [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} and ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}/{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ have the same homology. \[samehomology.lem\]
| $ omits the partitions obtained from $ S$ by amalgamating adjacent part of curious size, so that these edges may be regarded as removed or “ trot ”. This is illustrated in figure \[clippedcube.fig\ ], which should be compare with number 2 of [ @graphs03 p. 885 ]. We note that $ { \partial^\lambda}$ and $ { \partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ carbon monoxide - incide if each entry of $ S$ and $ \mu_a(S)$ have size at about three, which holds for the top two chain groups of the complex. We will practice this fact to calculate the top integral homology group of $ { { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ and [ [ $ \exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$ ] { } ] { }. The distinction between $ { \partial^\lambda}$ and $ { \partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ occurs for the inaugural time in the three dimensional clipped cube building complex and can be seen in figure \[clippedcube.fig\ ].
An agreement of the clipped cube building complex allows us to forecast the rational homology of $ { { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductively, using the long accurate sequence of the pair $ ({ { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$, and we pass to an understanding of $ { { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}$ using the long exact sequence of the pair $ ({ { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$. Our tool in doing so is the observation that the natural correspondence $ \tilde{S}\leftrightarrow S$ between the tilded cells of [ [ $ \exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$ ] { } ] { } and the cells of [ [ $ \exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$ ] { } ] { } has the follow algebraic consequence:
The spaces [ [ $ \exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$ ] { } ] { } and $ { { \ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}/{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ have the same homology. \[samehomology.lem\ ] | $ omlts the partitions obtaiked from $S$ by amcogamatmng adjzcent pafts of odd size, so that thesx edtes mqy be regarded as remoxed or “clppped”. Thiw is ullustratev in figmxe \[cliliedcuye.hig\], which shoulc be compased with figura 2 uf [@yraphs03 p. 885]. We note that ${\partial^\lambda}$ and ${\pattlal^\lambda_{\ensurgmath{\kwthbr{Q}}}}$ co-incide if each entry of $S$ and $\mu_a(S)$ heve size at mosy three, which holds for thf too two chain groups of the comkmex. Qe will use ghis fact uo calculate the top integral homology grouos of ${{\ensurematy{\ezp_{k}\!{({\ftsuremath{S^2}},\awt)}}}}$ anq [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}. Tha distimction between ${\pactiao^\lambda}$ and ${\partial^\lakbda_{\ensuremath{\mathff{Q}}}}$ occurv yor the first time in tye thtee dhmenruonxl dlmppsd cubf ckmplex and can be seeb in figure \[clippedcibq.dig\].
An understznding os the clipped cube complex allows us to camculate the rational honology of ${{\ensuremath{\edp_{k}\!{({\ensureiath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductively, using the long exact sequenca of vhd pclv $({{\enryrfmath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremaeg{S^2}},\ssn)}}}})$, and we pass to cn understanding ov ${{\rgsuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\gnsuremcfh{A^2}}}}}}$ using the long edact sezuencw of the kair $({{\rnsuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}},{{\enwuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\vnsueemath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$. Our toop in doing ro ix the observation that the nctural correspondfnce $\tilds{R}\leftrightarrow R$ bvtwean the tilded cells of [[$\exp_{h}\!{{\ensuremavh{S^2}}}$]{}]{} aud the cdlls of [[$\ex[_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremahh{S^2}},\asb)}$]{}]{} vas the following wlgebtaic cmnsequence:
Hhe spaces [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} aiv ${{\ensuremath{\ecp_{n}\!{{\envuremath{F^2}}}}}}/{{\ensuvemath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensurqmath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ have the saie hooology. \[samvhomology.nem\]
| $ omits the partitions obtained from $S$ adjacent of odd so that these removed “clipped”. This is in figure \[clippedcube.fig\], should be compared with figure 2 [@graphs03 p. 885]. We note that ${\partial^\lambda}$ and ${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ co-incide if each entry $S$ and $\mu_a(S)$ have size at most three, which holds for the top chain of complex. will use this fact to calculate the top integral homology groups of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ and [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}. The between ${\partial^\lambda}$ and ${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$ occurs for the first in the three dimensional cube complex and can be in \[clippedcube.fig\]. An of clipped complex allows us calculate the rational homology of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductively, using the long exact sequence of the pair $({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$, and pass to of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}$ the exact of the pair tool in doing so is the natural correspondence $\tilde{S}\leftrightarrow S$ between the tilded cells [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{} and cells of [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} has the following consequence: The spaces [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} and ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}/{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ have the homology. \[samehomology.lem\] | $ omits the partitions obtaineD from $S$ by amAlgamAtiNg aDjAcenT parTs of odd size, so tHAt thEse edges may be regarded aS remoVeD Or “clIPpEd”. ThiS is illuSTrATEd iN fIgUre \[ClIPpEdcubE.fiG\], which sHould be comParEd With figure 2 of [@GRaPhs03 p. 885]. We note ThaT ${\partial^\lambDa}$ aNd ${\partIaL^\laMBda_{\enSurEmath{\Mathbf{q}}}}$ Co-inciDe if each eNtRY of $S$ anD $\Mu_a(S)$ havE SIzE at mOst three, which holdS FoR The top two chain Groups Of THe COMplEx. WE will use thIs Fact tO CalculaTE tHE TOp iNTegral homologY groups of ${{\enSUreMath{\exP_{k}\!{({\EnsURemath{s^2}},\ast)}}}}$ aNd [[$\EXp_{k}\!{{\Ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}. the dIstinctioN betweEN ${\partiaL^\Lambda}$ aNd ${\partIal^\LamBda_{\eNSuReMatH{\mAThbF{q}}}}$ oCcuRS foR the firsT tImE in thE thrEE DIMensIonAl clIpped Cube complex anD caN be sEEn iN figuRe \[cliPpedCuBe.fig\].
an undeRstanDiNg of the clipped cUbe cOmplex allOws Us To cAlCulatE The ratIonAl hOmology Of ${{\ensurEMatH{\eXP_{K}\!{({\EnSuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductIvELY, uSing the lOng exaCT sEqUEnce of thE pAir $({{\EnsuREMath{\eXp_{k}\!{({\eNSuRemath{S^2}},\aSt)}}}},{{\ensuREmAtH{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\enSuRemath{s^2}},\aSt)}}}})$, aNd wE pass TO an uNderstAnding of ${{\EnsurEMath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensureMAth{S^2}}}}}}$ using the lONg EXAcT SequEncE of the pair $({{\eNsurEMath{\Exp_{k}\!{{\ENsUreMAth{S^2}}}}}},{{\eNsureMaTH{\eXP_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$. Our ToOl in doIng so Is the observatIon that the NATUral corrEspoNDeNCe $\tilde{S}\leftriGhtarRow S$ betweeN The tildeD cellS of [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\eNsuremath{s^2}}}$]{}]{} ANd the celLs oF [[$\exP_{k+1}\!{({\eNsuREMaTh{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} has the fOLLowiNg AlgebraIc cOnsequeNce:
the SpaCes [[$\ExP_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremAth{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} aNd ${{\EnSuReMatH{\exp_{k}\!{{\ENsurematH{S^2}}}}}}/{{\EnsUrEmaTh{\exp_{K}\!{({\EnsureMath{S^2}},\Ast)}}}}$ hAvE tHE saMe homolOGy. \[SAMehoMoLoGy.leM\]
| $ omits the partitions obt ained from $S$byama lg amat ingadjacent parts of o dd size, so that these edge sm ay b e r egard ed as r e mo v e d o r“c lip pe d ”. This is illust rated in f igu re \[clippedcu b e. fig\], whi chshould be co mpa red wi th fi g ure 2 of [@gr aphs03 p. 885 ]. We not et hat ${ \ partial ^ \ la mbda }$ and ${\partial ^ \l a mbda_{\ensurem ath{\m at h bf { Q }}} }$co-incideif each entry o f $ S $ and $\mu_a(S)$ ha ve size atm ost three ,whi c h hold s for t h e t op two chai n gr oups of t he com p lex. We will us e this fa ctto c a lc ul ate t h e t o pint e gra l homolo gy g roups of$ { { \ ensu rem ath{ \exp_ {k}\!{({\ensu rem ath{ S ^2} },\as t)}}} }$ a nd [[$\ exp_{k }\!{{ \e nsuremath{S^2}} }$]{ }]{}. The di st inc ti on be t ween $ {\p art ial^\la mbda}$a nd${ \ p a rt ial^\lambda_{\ensu re m a th {\mathbf {Q}}}} $ o cc u rs for t he fi rstt i me in the th ree dime nsiona l c li pped cu be compl ex an d c an be seen in fi gure \[c lippe d cube.fig\].
A n understandin g o f th e cli ppe d cube comp lexa llow s us to ca l culat e the r a ti o nal homology of ${{ \e nsurem ath{\ exp_{k}\!{({\ ensuremath { S ^ 2}},\ast )}}} } $i nductively, us ing t he long ex a ct seque nce o f the pa ir $({{\e n s uremath{ \ex p_{ k}\ !{( { \ en suremath{S^2} } , \ast )} }}},{{\ ens uremath {\e xp_ {k- 1}\ !{ ({\ensure math{S^2 }} ,\ as t) }}} })$,a nd we pa ss to a n u nders t anding of $ {{\e ns ur e mat h{\exp_ { k} \ ! {{\e ns ur emat h{S ^2 }}}}} }$ u s ing the lo ng exactseq u ence o fthe pai r $({{\ensure ma th{\exp_{k }\ !{{ \ensur e m ath{S^2} }}}}},{{\ensuremath{\ex p _{k}\!{ ({\ ensur emat h{S^2}},\ ast )}}}}) $.O ur too l in d oingso is t he ob s e rv ati on that then a tur al co rr espo ndence$\tilde{S}\leftrig h tar row S$ betwee n t he t i l de d c e ll s of [ [ $\e x p _{k}\!{{\ensure math{S^2}} }$ ] {} ]{} and t h e c el ls of [ [$\exp_ {k+1} \ !{({\en suremath{ S^2}},\as t) }$]{ } ] {}has the fo llowingalgebraic conse q ue nce:
Th e spac es [[ $\exp _{k+1} \ !{( {\ens uremat h{ S^2}}, \ast) }$ ]{}]{} a nd ${{\ensuremath{\exp_ {k}\!{ {\ens ure math{S^2} }}} } }/{ {\ensurem ath{ \exp_{k}\! {({ \en surem ath { S^2}} ,\as t )} }}} $ have the same homo l og y.\ [ sa mehomology. l e m \] | $ omits_the partitions_obtained from $S$ by_amalgamating adjacent_parts_of odd_size,_so that these_edges may be_regarded as removed or_“clipped”. This is_illustrated_in figure \[clippedcube.fig\], which should be compared with figure 2 of [@graphs03 p. 885]. We note that_${\partial^\lambda}$_and ${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$_co-incide_if_each entry of $S$ and_$\mu_a(S)$ have size at most_three, which_holds for the top two chain groups of_the_complex. We will_use this fact to calculate the top integral homology_groups of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ and [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}. The_distinction between ${\partial^\lambda}$_and_${\partial^\lambda_{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Q}}}}$_occurs for the first_time in the three dimensional clipped_cube complex and can be seen_in figure \[clippedcube.fig\].
An understanding of the clipped cube_complex allows us to calculate the_rational homology of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$ inductively,_using the_long exact sequence of the_pair $({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$, and_we pass_to an understanding_of ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}$ using the long exact_sequence of the_pair $({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}},{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})$. Our tool in doing_so_is the observation_that_the_natural correspondence_$\tilde{S}\leftrightarrow S$ between_the_tilded cells_of_[[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{} and the cells of [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} has_the_following algebraic consequence:
The spaces [[$\exp_{k+1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}$]{}]{} and ${{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}}}}/{{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}}$_have the same homology._\[samehomology.lem\]
|
states. In a recent work [@Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] this was shown for a system in which the atoms are confined to a deep ring lattice. Here the collective excitations of the atomic ensemble were calculated analytically and it was shown that - due to the special geometry of the ring - these excitations possess a particularly symmetric structure.
In this paper we show how these symmetric states can be used to devise single and two photon sources. The properties of the photonic states are imposed mainly by the interplay between the particular shape of the system and the collectivity in the photon emission. We provide a - to a large extent - analytic description of the photonic states and a thorough discussion of their properties, such as their angular emission characteristics as well as their spatial correlations. We find that the ring geometry permits the preparation of photons in a superposition state of two tunable emission directions. Furthermore, the system allows to create single photons with well-defined angular momentum and entangled photon pairs.
The paper is structured as follows: In Sec. \[sec:mapping\] we review the general atom-light mapping scheme following Refs. [@Lehmberg70; @Agarwal70; @Porras08] with particular emphasis on the special features emerging from the ring geometry. In Sec. \[sec:state\_preparation\] we outline - along the lines of Refs. [@Lukin01; @Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] - how symmetric entangled atomic states in a ring lattice can be created by exploiting the unique properties of excited Rydberg states. These states serve as a resource for the creation of single and two photon states whose properties are thoroughly discussed in Sec. \[sec:single\_photon\] and Sec. \[sec:two\_photon\], respectively. A conclusion and an outlook is provided in Sec. \[sec:conclusion\_outlook\].
Atom-photon mapping in a ring lattice {#sec:mapping}
=====================================
In this section, we recapitulate the general problem of how to create photons from atomic ensembles prepared in collective quantum states. We will discuss in detail the approximations entering our calculation and illuminate peculiarities which emerge form the particularly symmetric shape of the system.
![**a**: Internal level structure of each of the $N$ atoms of the ensemble. The excitations are stored in the two hyperfine ground states $\left|g\right>$ and $\left|s\right>$ which, together with the auxiliary level $\left|a | states. In a recent work [ @Olmos09; @Olmos09 - 3 ] this was shown for a arrangement in which the atom are confined to a deep ring wicket. Here the collective excitations of the atomic corps de ballet were forecast analytically and it was shown that - ascribable to the limited geometry of the ring - these excitation possess a particularly symmetrical structure.
In this paper we picture how these symmetric states can be use to devise single and two photon sources. The property of the photonic states are imposed mainly by the interplay between the particular human body of the system and the collectivity in the photon emission. We provide a - to a large extent - analytic description of the photonic states and a exhaustive discussion of their properties, such as their angular emission characteristics as well as their spatial correlations. We find that the gang geometry permits the preparation of photons in a superposition state of two tunable emission directions. Furthermore, the system allows to create individual photons with well - defined angular momentum and entangle photon pair.
The paper is structured as follows: In Sec. \[sec: mapping\ ] we review the cosmopolitan atom - light function scheme following Refs. [ @Lehmberg70; @Agarwal70; @Porras08 ] with particular vehemence on the special features emerging from the ring geometry. In Sec. \[sec: state\_preparation\ ] we outline - along the lines of Refs. [ @Lukin01; @Olmos09; @Olmos09 - 3 ] - how symmetric entangled atomic states in a ring wicket can be created by exploit the unique properties of excited Rydberg states. These states service as a resource for the creation of single and two photon states whose place are thoroughly discussed in Sec. \[sec: single\_photon\ ] and Sec. \[sec: two\_photon\ ], respectively. A conclusion and an outlook is provided in Sec. \[sec: conclusion\_outlook\ ].
Atom - photon function in a ring lattice { # sec: mapping }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In this section, we recapitulate the cosmopolitan problem of how to create photons from atomic ensemble prepared in corporate quantum states. We will discuss in detail the approximation entering our calculation and clear peculiarities which emerge form the particularly symmetric shape of the system.
! [ * * a * *: Internal level social organization of each of the $ N$ atoms of the ensemble. The excitement are stored in the two hyperfine ground states $ \left|g\right>$ and $ \left|s\right>$ which, together with the auxiliary level $ \left|a | stwtes. In a recent work [@Oloos09; @Olmos09-3] this cqs shoxn for z system in which the atoms are confmned to a deep ring lattice. Herd the colpective wxciuations of the atomic enscible aere ralculated analitically and it was shown dhxt - due to the special geometry of thq ring - tjese excitatiogs ppfsesa a particularly symmetric structude.
In thps paper we show now these symmetric states can be used to devise single and two photon sourcds. The prokexties of thg photonic states are imposed maknly yy the intet'oay tetween the partpcular shape of the sfstem amd the collectlvity in the photon emission. Xe provide a - to a lwrge extett - analytic descriptuon ox tha phuronkc atetea and w tiorough disdussion of rheir properties, suvh qs their angumar emysfion characteristics as well as their skatiam correlations. We find rhat the ring geometri permits ehe preparation of photons in a superposition stade of gwo tmnabuw fmission directions. Furthermore, the system aljkwx no create single ihotons with well-drflnrq angular momgntum aus sntangled photon pwirs.
The papee is strusturrd as follows: In Sec. \[sec:mapping\] we revivw tye general atom-ligkt mapping seheme golloeing Refs. [@Lehmberg70; @Agarcal70; @Podras08] with pwrticular dmphasis on the rpebial features emerging from thq ring geimetxy. In Sez. \[sev:state\_[reparatioj\] we outline - along the pines ox Refs. [@Lukln01; @Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] - how symmetric eivangled atomiv vtanes in a xing lsttice can be created by exkloiting che unkque propegties of xxcited Rydbqrg states. Thade states secve as a wesoyrce for thd creation of songle and two photob states whose proiertigs are thoroughly diwcussed in Sec. \[xec:rindlv\_phptjt\] and Sec. \[sew:two\_ohogpn\], rerpectivtjy. X comclusion and an outlmok js provided in Sec. \[scc:conclusuon\_outlojk\].
Atom-photon kapping in a ring pattire {#sec:oappimg}
=====================================
Ig this section, we recapitulate the genegal problem of row bo cteate photous from atomic ensembles prepared in coloective quantum sjates. We will discuss ln detail thx apprjximationv entering our calcuoation and illumikate peculiarities whidh emesge flrm the particularly symmetric shape of the system.
![**a**: Internal level structyre of each of the $N$ ayoms mf che ensqmblx. Vhe excitations age stored in the two hyperfine gcound statas $\left|g\right>$ and $\left|s\right>$ wnizh, together wkth the auxiliary level $\meft|a | states. In a recent work [@Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] shown a system which the atoms ring Here the collective of the atomic were calculated analytically and it was that - due to the special geometry of the ring - these excitations a particularly symmetric structure. In this paper we show how these symmetric states be to single two photon sources. The properties of the photonic states are imposed mainly by the interplay between particular shape of the system and the collectivity the photon emission. We a - to a large - description of photonic and thorough discussion of properties, such as their angular emission characteristics as well as their spatial correlations. We find that the geometry permits of photons a state two tunable emission the system allows to create single angular momentum and entangled photon pairs. The paper structured as In Sec. \[sec:mapping\] we review the atom-light mapping scheme following Refs. [@Lehmberg70; @Agarwal70; @Porras08] particular emphasis on the special features emerging from the ring geometry. In Sec. \[sec:state\_preparation\] we along the lines of [@Lukin01; @Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] how entangled states a ring can be created by exploiting the unique properties of excited Rydberg These states serve as a resource for the creation of two states whose properties thoroughly discussed in Sec. and \[sec:two\_photon\], respectively. A conclusion outlook provided Atom-photon in ring lattice {#sec:mapping} ===================================== this section, we recapitulate the problem of how to prepared in collective quantum states. We will discuss detail the approximations entering our calculation and peculiarities which emerge form the particularly symmetric shape of the system. ![**a**: level structure of the $N$ atoms of the ensemble. The are stored in the hyperfine ground states $\left|g\right>$ and $\left|s\right>$ which, together with auxiliary $\left|a | states. In a recent work [@Olmos09; @OLmos09-3] this waS showN foR a sYsTem iN whiCh the atoms are cONfinEd to a deep ring lattice. HeRe the CoLLectIVe ExcitAtions oF ThE ATomIc EnSemBlE WeRe calCulAted anaLytically aNd iT wAs shown that - dUE tO the speciaL geOmetry of the rIng - These eXcItaTIons pOssEss a pArticuLArly syMmetric stRuCTure.
In THis papeR WE sHow hOw these symmetric sTAtES can be used to deVise siNgLE aND Two PhoTon sources. thE propERties of THe PHOTonIC states are impOsed mainly bY The InterpLaY beTWeen thE partIcULar Shape of the sYsteM and the coLlectiVIty in thE Photon eMissioN. We ProVide A - To A lArgE eXTenT - AnAlyTIc dEscriptiOn Of The phOtonIC STAtes And A thoRough Discussion of tHeiR proPErtIes, suCh as tHeir AnGular EmissiOn chaRaCteristics as welL as tHeir spatiAl cOrRelAtIons. WE Find thAt tHe rIng geomEtry perMIts ThE PREpAration of photons in A sUPErPosition State oF TwO tUNable emiSsIon DireCTIons. FUrthERmOre, the syStem alLOwS tO create SiNgle phOtOns WitH well-DEfinEd anguLar momenTum anD Entangled photoN Pairs.
The paper IS sTRUcTUred As fOllows: In Sec. \[Sec:mAPpinG\] we rEViEw tHE geneRal atOm-LIgHT mapping scheme folloWiNg Refs. [@lehmbErg70; @Agarwal70; @PorRas08] with parTICUlar emphAsis ON tHE special featurEs emeRging from tHE ring geoMetry. in Sec. \[sec:State\_prepARAtion\] we oUtlIne - AloNg tHE LiNes of Refs. [@LukiN01; @oLmos09; @olMos09-3] - how sYmmEtric enTanGleD atOmiC sTates in a rIng lattiCe CaN bE cReaTed by EXploitinG tHe uNiQue PropeRTies of ExcitEd RyDbErG StaTes. ThesE StATEs seRvE aS a reSouRcE for tHe crEAtiOn of sinGle and two PhoTOn stAtEs Whose prOperties are thOrOughly discUsSed In Sec. \[sEC:Single\_phOton\] and Sec. \[sec:two\_photon\], rESpectivEly. a concLusiOn and an ouTloOk is prOviDEd in SeC. \[sec:coNclusIoN\_ouTLOok\].
AtOM-PhOtoN mApping in a rING laTtice {#SeC:mapPing}
=====================================
In tHis section, we recapiTUlaTe the general pRobLem oF HOw To cREaTE phOtONs fROM atomic ensembleS prepared iN cOLlEctive quanTUm sTaTes. We wiLl discuSs in dETail the ApproximaTions enteRiNg ouR CAlcUlation and IlluminaTe peculiaRIties WHiCh emeRge Form thE pArtIculaRly symMEtrIc shaPe of thE sYstem.
![**a**: interNaL level stRucture of each of the $N$ atomS of the EnsemBle. the excitaTioNS arE stored in The tWo hyperfinE grOunD statEs $\lEFt|g\riGht>$ aND $\lEft|S\Right>$ WhicH, Together wITh The AUXiLiary level $\lEFT|A | states. In a recent work[@Olmos09; @Olm os0 9-3 ]this was shown for a s y stem in which the atoms ar e con fi n ed t o a deep ring l a tt i c e.He re th ec ol lecti veexcitat ions of th e a to mic ensemble we re calcula ted analyticall y a nd itwa s s h own t hat - du e to t h e spec ial geome tr y of th e ring - t he se e xcitations posses s a particularly s ymmetr ic st r u ctu re.
In thispa per w e show h o wt h e ses ymmetric stat es can be u s edto dev is e s i ngle a nd tw op hot on sources. The properti es oft he phot o nic sta tes ar e i mpo sedm ai nl y b yt hei nt erp l aybetweenth eparti cula r s h apeofthesyste m and the col lec tivi t y i n the phot on e mi ssion . We p rovid ea - to a largeexte nt - anal yti cdes cr iptio n of th e p hot onic st ates an d ath o r o ug h discussion of th ei r pr operties , such as t h eir angu la r e miss i o n cha ract e ri stics as wella sth eir spa ti al cor re lat ion s. We find thatthe ring geom e try permits th e preparationo fp h ot o ns i n a superposit ions tate oft wo tu n ableemiss io n d i rections. Furthermo re , thesyste m allows to c reate sing l e photonswith we l l-defined angu lar m omentum an d entangl ed ph oton pai rs.
Thep a per is s tru ctu red as f ol lows: In Sec. \ [sec :m apping\ ] w e revie w t hegen era latom-ligh t mappin gsc he me fo llowi n g Refs.[@ Leh mb erg 70; @ A garwal 70; @ Porr as 08 ] wi th part i cu l a r em ph as is o n t he spec ialf eat ures em erging fr omt he r in ggeometr y. In Sec. \[ se c:state\_p re par ation\ ] we outli ne - along the lines of Refs. [ @Lu kin01 ; @O lmos09; @ Olm os09-3 ] - how sy mmetri c ent an gle d atomi c st ate sin a ringl a tti ce ca nbe c reatedby exploiting theu niq ue properties of exc i t ed Ry d be r g s ta t es. T hese states ser ve as a re so u rc e for thec rea ti on of s ingle a nd tw o photon states w hose prop er ties a rethoroughly discuss ed in Sec . \[se c :s ingle \_p hoton\ ]and Sec. \[sec : two \_pho ton\], r espect ively .A conclu sion and an outlook isprovid ed in Se c. \[sec: con c lus ion\_outl ook\ ].
Atom-p hot onmappi ngi n a r ingl at tic e {#se c:ma p ping}
=== = == === = = == =========== = = = === ===== ==In thi s se ction, we recapit u late the gener al p r o ble m o f how t o create photo nsfr o m atomicen sembles pre pared in c o llect ive qu antumstates. W ew ill di scus s i n detailthe a p proxima ti on s enter ingou r calc ulatio n and i lluminate peculi ariti e s whic h em ergefo rm thep arti cularly sy mmetric sha pe ofthesyste m.
![* *a **: In ter na l level st r ucture of each of the $ N$ a tom s of t he e n s emble . Th eexc itationsa r es to re d in the twohy perf ine groun d states$\l e ft|g\ri gh t>$ a nd $\l e ft | s \right>$ w hic h, to g e ther witht he a u xi l iarylevel$\left |a | states._In a_recent work [@Olmos09; @Olmos09-3]_this was_shown_for a_system_in which the_atoms are confined_to a deep ring_lattice. Here the_collective_excitations of the atomic ensemble were calculated analytically and it was shown that -_due_to the_special_geometry_of the ring - these_excitations possess a particularly symmetric_structure.
In this_paper we show how these symmetric states can_be_used to devise_single and two photon sources. The properties of the_photonic states are imposed mainly by_the interplay between_the_particular_shape of the system_and the collectivity in the photon_emission. We provide a - to_a large extent - analytic description of_the photonic states and a thorough_discussion of their properties, such_as their_angular emission characteristics as well_as their spatial_correlations. We_find that the_ring geometry permits the preparation of_photons in a_superposition state of two tunable emission_directions._Furthermore, the system_allows_to_create single_photons with well-defined_angular_momentum and_entangled_photon pairs.
The paper is structured as_follows:_In Sec. \[sec:mapping\] we review the general_atom-light mapping scheme following_Refs._[@Lehmberg70; @Agarwal70; @Porras08] with_particular emphasis on the special_features emerging from the ring geometry._In Sec._\[sec:state\_preparation\] we_outline - along the lines of Refs. [@Lukin01; @Olmos09; @Olmos09-3] -_how symmetric entangled atomic states in_a ring lattice can_be created_by_exploiting the unique_properties_of excited_Rydberg states. These states serve as a_resource for_the creation of single and two_photon states whose properties_are_thoroughly discussed in Sec. \[sec:single\_photon\] and_Sec. \[sec:two\_photon\], respectively. A conclusion and_an outlook is provided in_Sec._\[sec:conclusion\_outlook\].
Atom-photon_mapping in a ring lattice_{#sec:mapping}
=====================================
In this section, we recapitulate the_general problem of_how to create photons from atomic ensembles_prepared_in collective quantum states. We will_discuss_in detail the approximations entering our_calculation_and_illuminate peculiarities which emerge form_the particularly symmetric shape of the_system.
![**a**: Internal level structure of each of the $N$_atoms of the_ensemble. The excitations are stored_in_the_two hyperfine ground states $\left|g\right>$ and $\left|s\right>$ which, together with_the auxiliary_level $\left|a |
right-handed slepton and $\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents the average of the squared velocity of the LSP, which could be determined by a close inspection of the scattering of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $E\gg m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross section off an electron in the thermal bath to be of the order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
\frac{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the energy of the LSP, yielding the interaction rate $\Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $H$ $$\frac{\Gamma}{H} \sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
\frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm GeV}} \right).$$ This implies that by a series of scattering, the LSPs, which were energetic when produced, lose their momenta substantially and they will go to the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering in the non-relativistic region, however, their momentum loss is at most about the background temperature at one collision and they do not likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If the LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average $\langle v^2\rangle$ is of order $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our ignorance of the precise value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation cross section is not large enough. Indeed, taking $m_{\tilde l_R} = m_{LSP} \sim 10^2$ GeV, Eq. (\[bann1\]) leads $$\langle \sigma_{ann} v_{rel} \rangle =
\pi \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
\sim 3 \langle v^2 \rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the requisite annihilation cross section (\[required-cross-section\]) even for $\langle v^2 | right - handed slepton and $ \langle v^2 \rangle$ represents the average of the squared velocity of the LSP, which could be determined by a cheeseparing inspection of the dispersion of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $ E\gg m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic disperse cross section off an electron in the thermal bathroom to be of the club of $ $ \langle \sigma v_{rel } \rangle \sim \alpha^{\prime 2 }
\frac{E T_R(\phi) } { m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $ E$ is the energy of the LSP, succumb the interaction rate $ \Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $ H$ $ $ \frac{\Gamma}{H } \sim \alpha^{\prime 2 }
\frac{E T_R(\phi) ^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4 } \sim
10 ^ 4 \left (\frac{E}{10 ^ 2 { \rm GeV } } \right).$$ This incriminate that by a series of scattering, the LSPs, which were energetic when produce, miss their momenta substantially and they will go to the non - relativistic energy region. Once embark in the non - relativistic region, however, their momentum loss is at most about the background temperature at one collision and they do not probably reach their kinetic chemical equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If the LSP is in energizing equilibrium, the median $ \langle v^2\rangle$ is of order $ T_R(\phi) /m_{LSP } \sim 10^{-4}$. ] { } $ $ \frac{T_R(\phi) } { m_{LSP } } \ll \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our ignorance of the precise value of $ \langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation hybridization section is not large enough. Indeed, taking $ m_{\tilde l_R } = m_{LSP } \sim 10 ^ 2 $ GeV, Eq. (\[bann1\ ]) leads $ $ \langle \sigma_{ann } v_{rel } \rangle =
\pi \alpha^{\prime 2 } \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2 } \langle v^2\rangle
\sim 3 \langle v^2 \rangle \times 10^{-8 } { \rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the requisite annihilation cross section (\[required - cross - section\ ]) even for $ \langle v^2 | rihht-handed slepton and $\lakgle v^2 \rangle$ rekrwsents the aberage ow the squared velocity of thx LSP, whixh could be determined by a clode inspextioi of the scattermhg of tmz LSP lff chx thermal radiajions. For tha case of $E\gg k_{LRP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross xeftion off an ejectgog in nht thermal bath to be of the order of $$\lanjle \sigma v_{rel} \tangle \sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
\fraf{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the wnergy of thd LSP, yielding the intgraction rate $\Gamma$ versus the ebpansnon rate $H$ $$\drqc{\Gwkma}{H} \sim \al'ha^{\priie 2}
\frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 K}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
10^4 \lent( \frec{E}{10^2 {\em GeV}} \right).$$ This impnies that by a seryes of scdtcering, the LSPs, which wwre etergatic qhev pdovucsd, losf tieir momentz substantiqlly and they will bo np the non-relztiviseis energy region. Once entering in the not-remativistic region, howevwr, their momentum losd is at mjst about the background temperature at one collivion ena tkcn do boh likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therqrote we expect[If tme LSP is in kinetoc eaoilibrium, the xveragz $\lzngle v^2\rangle$ is ov order $T_R(\phu )/m_{LSP} \sii 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\ftac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2 \rqngle \ll 1.$$ Evvn wuth our ignorance lf the precnse vakue og $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we cau see fhat the anjihilatioh cross section ir npt large enough. Indeed, takind $m_{\tilde o_R} = k_{LSP} \sio 10^2$ GgV, Eq. (\[bagn1\]) leads $$\lwngle \sigma_{ann} v_{rel} \rangpe =
\[i \alpha^{\prlme 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
\sim 3 \langle f^2 \sancle \timef 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than jhe requifite xnnihilatikn crosv section (\[rqquired-cross-saftion\]) even fmr $\langlq v^2 | right-handed slepton and $\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents of squared velocity the LSP, which close of the scattering the LSP off thermal radiations. For the case of m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross section off an electron in the bath to be of the order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim \alpha^{\prime \frac{E )}{m_{\tilde where is the energy of the LSP, yielding the interaction rate $\Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $H$ \sim \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} 10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm \right).$$ This implies that by series scattering, the which energetic produced, lose their substantially and they will go to the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering in the non-relativistic region, however, momentum loss most about background at collision and they likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average $\langle is of $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our of the precise value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation cross not large enough. Indeed, $m_{\tilde l_R} = \sim GeV, (\[bann1\]) $$\langle \sigma_{ann} \rangle = \pi \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle \sim 3 \langle \rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the cross (\[required-cross-section\]) even for v^2 | right-handed slepton and $\langLe v^2 \rangle$ rEpresEntS thE aVeraGe of The squared veloCIty oF the LSP, which could be detErminEd BY a clOSe InspeCtion of THe SCAttErInG of ThE lSp off tHe tHermal rAdiations. FOr tHe Case of $E\gg m_{LSp}$, We Estimate thE elAstic scatterIng Cross sEcTioN Off an EleCtron In the tHErmal bAth to be of ThE Order oF $$\Langle \sIGMa V_{rel} \Rangle \sim \alpha^{\priME 2}
\fRAc{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde E_R}^4},$$ wherE $E$ IS tHE EneRgy Of the LSP, yiElDing tHE interaCTiON RAte $\gAmma$ versus the Expansion raTE $H$ $$\fRac{\GamMa}{h} \siM \Alpha^{\pRime 2}
\fRaC{e T_R(\Phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_r}^4} \sim
10^4 \Left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\Rm GeV}} \rIGht).$$ This IMplies tHat by a SerIes Of scATtErIng, ThE lSPS, WhIch WEre EnergetiC wHeN prodUced, LOSE TheiR moMentA subsTantially and tHey Will GO to The noN-relaTiviStIc eneRgy regIon. OnCe Entering in the noN-relAtivistic RegIoN, hoWeVer, thEIr momeNtuM loSs is at mOst abouT The BaCKGRoUnd temperature at onE cOLLiSion and tHey do nOT lIkELy reach tHeIr kInetIC EquilIbriUM. THerefore We expeCT[IF tHe LSP is In KinetiC eQuiLibRium, tHE aveRage $\laNgle v^2\ranGle$ is OF order $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSp} \Sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{lsP}} \LL \LaNGle v^2 \RanGle \ll 1.$$ Even wiTh ouR IgnoRancE Of The PRecisE valuE oF $\LaNGle v^2 \rangle$, we can see tHaT the anNihilAtion cross secTion is not lARGE enough. INdeeD, TaKIng $m_{\tilde l_R} = m_{LSp} \sim 10^2$ GEV, Eq. (\[bann1\]) leADs $$\langle \Sigma_{Ann} v_{rel} \rAngle =
\pi \alPHA^{\prime 2} \frAc{1}{m_{lSP}^2} \LanGle V^2\RAnGle
\sim 3 \langle v^2 \RANgle \TiMes 10^{-8} {\rm Gev^{-2}},$$ whIch is smAllEr tHan The ReQuisite anNihilatiOn CrOsS sEctIon (\[reQUired-croSs-SecTiOn\]) eVen foR $\Langle V^2 | right-handed slepton and$\langle v ^2 \r ang le$ r epre sent s the averageo f th e squared velocity ofthe L SP , whi c hcould be det e rm i n edby a cl os e i nspec tio n of th e scatteri ngof the LSP off th e thermalrad iations. For th e case o f $ E \gg m _{L SP}$, we es t imatethe elast ic scatte r ing cro s s s ecti on off an electro n i n the thermal b ath to b e o f the or der of $$\ la ngle\ sigma v _ {r e l } \r a ngle \sim \a lpha^{\prim e 2}
\ fr ac{ E T_R(\ phi ) }{ m _{\ tilde e_R}^ 4},$ $ where $ E$ ist he ener g y of th e LSP, yi eld ingt he i nte ra c tio n r ate $\G amma$ ve rs us theexpa n s i o n ra te$H$$$\fr ac{\Gamma}{H} \s im \ a lph a^{\p rime2}
\fra c{E T_ R(\ph i)^2 M}{m_{\tild e e_ R}^4} \si m
10 ^4 \lef t ( \fra c{E }{1 0^2 {\r m GeV}} \ri gh t ) . $$ This implies that b y aseries o f scat t er in g , the LS Ps , w hich w ere e nerg e ti c when p roduce d ,lo se thei rmoment asub sta ntial l y an d they will go to t h e non-relativi s tic energy re g io n . O n ce e nte ring in the non - rela tivi s ti c r e gion, howe ve r ,t heir momentum lossis at mo st ab out the backg round temp e r a ture atonec ol l ision and they do n ot likelyr each the ir ki netic eq uilibrium . Therefor e w e e xpe ct[ I f t he LSP is ink i neti cequilib riu m, theave rag e $ \la ng le v^2\ra ngle$ is o for de r $ T_R(\ p hi )/m_{ LS P}\s im10^{- 4 }$.]{} $$\f rac{ T_ R( \ phi )}{m_{ L SP } } \ll \ la ngle v^ 2\rang le \ l l 1 .$$ Eve n with ou r i g nora nc eof theprecise value o f $\langle v ^2\rangl e $ , we can see that the annihilat i on cros s s ectio n is not larg e e nough. In d eed, t aking$m_{\ ti lde l _R} = m _{ LSP }\sim 10^2$ G eV, Eq.(\ [ban n1\]) l eads $$\langle \si g ma_ {ann} v_{rel} \r angl e = \p i \a lp h a^{ \ p rime 2} \frac{1 }{m_{LSP}^ 2} \l angle v^2\ r ang le
\s im 3 \ langl e v^2 \r angle \ti mes 10^{- 8} {\r m GeV ^{-2}},$$which is smallert han t h erequi sit e anni hi lat ion c ross s e cti on (\ [requi re d-cros s-sec ti on\]) ev en for $\langle v^2 | right-handed_slepton and_$\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents_the average_of_the squared_velocity_of the LSP,_which could be_determined by a close_inspection of the_scattering_of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $E\gg m_{LSP}$, we_estimate_the elastic_scattering_cross_section off an electron in_the thermal bath to be_of the_order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim _\alpha^{\prime_2}
_ \frac{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the_energy of the LSP, yielding the_interaction rate $\Gamma$_versus_the_expansion rate $H$ $$\frac{\Gamma}{H}_\sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
_\frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
_ 10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm_GeV}} \right).$$ This implies that by_a series of scattering, the_LSPs, which_were energetic when produced, lose_their momenta substantially_and they_will go to_the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering_in the non-relativistic_region, however, their momentum loss is_at_most about the_background_temperature_at one_collision and they_do_not likely_reach_their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If_the_LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average_$\langle v^2\rangle$ is of_order_$T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{}_$$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2_\rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our_ignorance of_the precise_value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation_cross section is not large enough._Indeed, taking $m_{\tilde l_R}_= m_{LSP}_\sim_10^2$ GeV, Eq. (\[bann1\])_leads_$$\langle \sigma_{ann}_v_{rel} \rangle =
\pi_\alpha^{\prime 2}_\frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
_\sim 3 \langle_v^2_\rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which_is smaller than the requisite annihilation_cross section (\[required-cross-section\]) even for_$\langle_v^2 |
JAS, VHCh, LKE were partially supported by the research grants No. 97-02-17168 and 1.2.2.2 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and from the State Programm “Astronomy” respectively.
Afanasiev, V.L., Lipovetsky, V.A., Mikhailov, V.P, Nazarov, E.A., & Shapovalova, A.I. 1991, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO.), 31, 121
Afanasiev, V.L., Burenkov, A.N., Vlasyuk, V.V., & Drabek, S.V. 1995, SAO technical report No. 234
Bade, N., Fink, H.H., Engels, D., Voges, W. Hagen, H.-J., Wisotzki, L., & Reimers, D. 1995, A&AS, 110, 469
Berg, C., Wegner, G., Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., & Hewett, P.C. 1992, ApJS, 78, 409
Bicay, M.D, Seal, J., Kojoian, G., Stepanian, J.A., Chavushyan, V.H., Erastova, L.K., & Ayvazyan V.T. 1999, (in press)
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Balayan, S.K.,& Vlasyuk, V.V. 1995, Astron. Letters. 21, 894
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Vlasyuk, V.V., & Ayvazyan, V.T. 1999 (in preparetion)
Drabek, S.V., Kopilov, I.M., Somov, N.N., & Somova, T.A. 1985, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO.), 22, 64
Green, R.F., Schmidt, M., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJS, 61, 305
Laurent-Muehleisen, S | JAS, VHCh, LKE were partially supported by the research grants No. 97 - 02 - 17168 and 1.2.2.2 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and from the State Programm “ Astronomy ” respectively.
Afanasiev, V.L., Lipovetsky, V.A., Mikhailov, V.P, Nazarov, E.A., & Shapovalova, A.I. 1991, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO .), 31, 121
Afanasiev, V.L., Burenkov, A.N., Vlasyuk, V.V., & Drabek, S.V. 1995, SAO technical reputation No. 234
Bade, N., Fink, H.H., Engels, D., Voges, W. Hagen, H.-J., Wisotzki, L., & Reimers, D. 1995, A&AS, 110, 469
Berg, C., Wegner, G., Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., & Hewett, P.C. 1992, ApJS, 78, 409
Bicay, M.D, Seal, J., Kojoian, G., Stepanian, J.A., Chavushyan, V.H., Erastova, L.K., & Ayvazyan V.T. 1999, (in wardrobe)
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Balayan, S.K., & Vlasyuk, V.V. 1995, Astron. Letters. 21, 894
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Vlasyuk, V.V., & Ayvazyan, V.T. 1999 (in preparetion)
Drabek, S.V., Kopilov, I.M., Somov, N.N., & Somova, T.A. 1985, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO .), 22, 64
Green, R.F., Schmidt, M., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJS, 61, 305
Laurent - Muehleisen, S | JAD, VHCh, LKE were partialln supported by tkw reseerch grznts No. 97-02-17168 and 1.2.2.2 from the Russian Foundetiob for Basic Research and frum the Stwte Progeamm “Qstronomy” csspectiyzly.
Afzkasier, T.L., Lipovetsky, V.S., Mikhailoe, V.P, Nazarov, E.D., & Skapovalova, A.I. 1991, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SWO.), 31, 121
Afamadiev, V.L., Burenkjv, A.M., Vlaajuj, V.V., & Drabek, S.V. 1995, SAO technicam reporu No. 234
Bade, N., Fink, H.N., Engels, D., Voges, W. Hagen, H.-U., Widotzki, L., & Reimers, F. 1995, A&AS, 110, 469
Bert, C., Rwgner, G., Foltx, C.B., Chaffte, F.H., & Hewetj, P.C. 1992, ApJS, 78, 409
Bicay, M.D, Seal, J., Kojokan, G., Stepanian, J.Q., Cjdvushyan, V.H., Erasnova, L.K., & Ayvadjan V.T. 1999, (in prexs)
Chavushyan, V.M., Ste'aniqn, J.A., Balayan, S.K.,& Vlasbuk, V.V. 1995, Astron. Lettets. 21, 894
Chavusvycn, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Vlqstuk, V.E., & Afvazhqn, X.T. 1999 (ii pdeparehioi)
Drabek, S.V., Iopilov, I.M., Womov, N.N., & Somova, T.A. 1985, Wwtrofiz. Issles. (Izv. FAJ.), 22, 64
Green, R.F., Schmidt, M., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJS, 61, 305
Lahrent-Muehleisen, S | JAS, VHCh, LKE were partially supported by grants 97-02-17168 and from the Russian from State Programm “Astronomy” Afanasiev, V.L., Lipovetsky, Mikhailov, V.P, Nazarov, E.A., & Shapovalova, 1991, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO.), 31, 121 Afanasiev, V.L., Burenkov, A.N., Vlasyuk, V.V., Drabek, S.V. 1995, SAO technical report No. 234 Bade, N., Fink, H.H., Engels, Voges, Hagen, Wisotzki, & Reimers, D. 1995, A&AS, 110, 469 Berg, C., Wegner, G., Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., & P.C. 1992, ApJS, 78, 409 Bicay, M.D, Seal, Kojoian, G., Stepanian, J.A., V.H., Erastova, L.K., & Ayvazyan 1999, press) Chavushyan, Stepanian, Balayan, Vlasyuk, V.V. 1995, Letters. 21, 894 Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Vlasyuk, V.V., & Ayvazyan, V.T. 1999 (in preparetion) Drabek, S.V., I.M., Somov, Somova, T.A. Astrofiz. (Izv. 22, 64 Green, M., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJS, S | JAS, VHCh, LKE were partially suPported by tHe resEarCh gRaNts NO. 97-02-17168 and 1.2.2.2 From the Russian fOundAtion for Basic Research aNd froM tHE StaTE PRograMm “AstroNOmY” REspEcTiVelY.
AFAnAsiev, v.L., LIpovetsKy, V.A., MikhaiLov, v.P, nazarov, E.A., & ShaPOvAlova, A.I. 1991, AstRofIz. Issled. (Izv. SaO.), 31, 121
AFanasiEv, v.L., BURenkoV, A.N., vlasyUk, V.V., & DrABek, S.V. 1995, SaO technicAl REport NO. 234
bade, N., FiNK, h.H., engeLs, D., Voges, W. Hagen, H.-J., WISoTZki, L., & Reimers, D. 1995, A&As, 110, 469
Berg, C., weGNeR, g., folTz, C.b., Chaffee, F.H., & heWett, P.c. 1992, apJS, 78, 409
BicAY, M.d, sEAl, J., kOjoian, G., StepanIan, J.A., ChavusHYan, v.H., ErasToVa, L.k., & ayvazyAn V.T. 1999, (iN pREss)
chavushyan, V.h., StePanian, J.A., BAlayan, s.k.,& VlasyuK, v.V. 1995, AstroN. LetteRs. 21, 894
CHavUshyAN, V.h., STepAnIAn, J.a., vlAsyUK, V.V., & ayvazyan, v.T. 1999 (In PrepaRetiON)
dRAbek, s.V., KOpilOv, I.M., SOmov, N.N., & Somova, T.a. 1985, AsTrofIZ. IsSled. (IZv. SAO.), 22, 64
greeN, R.f., SchmIdt, M., & LiEbert, j. 1986, APJS, 61, 305
Laurent-MuehlEiseN, S | JAS, VHCh, LKE were parti ally suppo rtedbythe r esea rchgrants No. 97- 0 2-17 168 and 1.2.2.2 from t he Ru ss i an F o un datio n for B a si c Res ea rc h a nd fr om th e S tate Pr ogramm “As tro no my” respecti v el y.
Afanas iev , V.L., Lipo vet sky, V .A .,M ikhai lov , V.P , Naza r ov, E. A., & Sha po v alova, A.I. 19 9 1 ,Astr ofiz. Issled. (Iz v .S AO.), 31, 121
Afana si e v, V .L. , B urenkov, A .N ., Vl a syuk, V . V. , & Dr a bek, S.V. 199 5, SAO tech n ica l repo rt No . 234
Bade, N . , F ink, H.H.,Enge ls, D., V oges,W . Hagen , H.-J., Wisot zki , L ., & Re im ers ,D . 1 9 95 , A & AS, 110, 46 9
B erg,C.,W e g n er,G., Fol tz, C .B., Chaffee, F. H.,& He wett, P.C. 199 2, ApJS , 78,409
Bi cay, M.D, Seal, J., Kojoian, G. ,Ste pa nian, J.A.,Cha vus hyan, V .H., Er a sto va , L .K ., & Ayvazyan V.T. 1 9 9 9, (in pre ss)
C h av us h yan, V.H ., St epan i a n, J. A.,B al ayan, S. K.,& V l as yu k, V.V. 1 995, A st ron . L etter s . 21 , 894
Chavush yan,V .H., Stepanian , J.A., Vlasyu k ,V . V. , & A yva zyan, V.T.1999 (inprep a re tio n )
Dr abek, S . V. , Kopilov, I.M., Som ov , N.N. , & S omova, T.A. 1 985, Astro f i z . Issled . (I z v. SAO.), 22, 64
Gree n, R.F., S c hmidt, M ., &Liebert, J. 1986, A pJS, 61, 30 5
Lau ren t - Mu ehleisen, S | JAS,_VHCh, LKE_were partially supported by_the research_grants_No. 97-02-17168_and_1.2.2.2 from the_Russian Foundation for_Basic Research and from_the State Programm_“Astronomy”_respectively.
Afanasiev, V.L., Lipovetsky, V.A., Mikhailov, V.P, Nazarov, E.A., & Shapovalova, A.I. 1991, Astrofiz. Issled._(Izv._SAO.), 31,_121
Afanasiev,_V.L.,_Burenkov, A.N., Vlasyuk, V.V., &_Drabek, S.V. 1995, SAO technical_report No._234
Bade, N., Fink, H.H., Engels, D., Voges, W._Hagen,_H.-J., Wisotzki, L.,_& Reimers, D. 1995, A&AS, 110, 469
Berg, C., Wegner,_G., Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., &_Hewett, P.C. 1992,_ApJS,_78,_409
Bicay, M.D, Seal, J.,_Kojoian, G., Stepanian, J.A., Chavushyan, V.H.,_Erastova, L.K., & Ayvazyan V.T. 1999,_(in press)
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Balayan, S.K.,&_Vlasyuk, V.V. 1995, Astron. Letters. 21,_894
Chavushyan, V.H., Stepanian, J.A., Vlasyuk,_V.V., &_Ayvazyan, V.T. 1999 (in preparetion)
Drabek,_S.V., Kopilov, I.M.,_Somov, N.N.,_& Somova, T.A._1985, Astrofiz. Issled. (Izv. SAO.), 22,_64
Green, R.F., Schmidt,_M., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJS,_61,_305
Laurent-Muehleisen, S |
. 1999, A&A, 347, 866
, M., [Verbunt]{}, F., [Tagliaferri]{}, G., [Belloni]{}, T., [Bedin]{}, L., & [Platais]{}, I. 2012, ApJ (submitted)
, F. 2000, in Stellar Clusters and Associations: Convection, Rotation, and Dynamos, edited by R. [Pallavicini]{}, G. [Micela]{}, & S. [Sciortino]{}, vol. 198 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 421.
Verbunt, F., & Phinney, E. S. 1995, A&A, 296, 709
, R. K. S., [Bedin]{}, L. R., [Piotto]{}, G., [Anderson]{}, J., [Cassisi]{}, S., [Villanova]{}, S., [Platais]{}, I., [Pasquini]{}, L., [Momany]{}, Y., & [Sagar]{}, R. 2008,, 484, 609.
, J.-P. 1989,, 220, 112
---
abstract: 'We present an implementation of range separated functionals utilizing the Slater-function on grids in real space in the projector augmented waves method. The screened Poisson equation is solved to evaluate the necessary screened exchange integrals on Cartesian grids. The implementation is verified against existing literature and applied to the description of charge transfer excitations. We find very slow convergence for calculations within linear response time-dependent density functional theory and unoccupied orbitals of the canonical Fock operator. Convergence can be severely improved by using Huzinaga’s virtual orbitals instead. This combination furthermore enables an accurate determination of long-range charge transfer excitations by means of ground-state calculations.'
author:
- Rolf
- Michael
bibliography:
- './Yukawa\_GPAW.bib'
title: Charge transfer excitations with range separated functionals using improved virtual orbitals
---
Introduction
============
The study of intra-molecular charge transfer excitations (CTE) is of interest in photovoltaics[@sariciftci_photoinduced_1992], organic electronics[@samori_epitaxial_2002] and molecular and organic magnetism[@blundell_organic_2004]. Within a single particle picture, the simplest CTE is the excitation of an electron from the highest molecular | . 1999, A&A, 347, 866
, M., [ Verbunt ] { }, F., [ Tagliaferri ] { }, G., [ Belloni ] { }, T., [ Bedin ] { }, L., & [ Platais ] { }, I. 2012, ApJ (submitted)
, F. 2000, in Stellar Clusters and Associations: Convection, Rotation, and Dynamos, edited by R. [ Pallavicini ] { }, G. [ Micela ] { }, & S. [ Sciortino ] { }, vol. 198 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 421.
Verbunt, F., & Phinney, E. S. 1995, A&A, 296, 709
, R. K. S., [ Bedin ] { }, L. R., [ Piotto ] { }, G., [ Anderson ] { }, J., [ Cassisi ] { }, S., [ Villanova ] { }, S., [ Platais ] { }, I., [ Pasquini ] { }, L., [ Momany ] { }, Y., & [ Sagar ] { }, R. 2008, , 484, 609.
, J.-P. 1989, , 220, 112
---
abstract:' We present an implementation of compass discriminate functionals utilizing the Slater - function on power system in real space in the projector augment wave method acting. The screened Poisson equality is solved to evaluate the necessary screen exchange integrals on Cartesian grids. The execution is verified against existing literature and apply to the description of charge transfer excitement. We find very slow convergence for calculation within linear response time - pendent density functional theory and unoccupied orbitals of the canonical Fock operator. Convergence can be hard improved by using Huzinaga ’s virtual orbitals instead. This combination furthermore enables an accurate determination of long - range charge transfer excitations by means of ground - state calculations.'
author:
- Rolf
- Michael
bibliography:
-' ./Yukawa\_GPAW.bib'
title: Charge transportation excitement with range separate functionals use improved virtual orbitals
---
Introduction
= = = = = = = = = = = =
The study of intra - molecular mission transportation excitations (CTE) is of interest in photovoltaics[@sariciftci_photoinduced_1992 ], organic electronics[@samori_epitaxial_2002 ] and molecular and constituent magnetism[@blundell_organic_2004 ]. Within a single particle picture, the simplest CTE is the excitation of an electron from the highest molecular | . 1999, A&W, 347, 866
, M., [Verbunt]{}, F., [Tagliafevri]{}, G., [Belloni]{}, T., [Ywdin]{}, L., & [Platzis]{}, I. 2012, AoJ (submitted)
, F. 2000, in Stellar Cpuwters and Associations: Convdction, Ronation, ane Dyiamos, edited by C. [Lallavignni]{}, G. [Jlcela]{}, & S. [Sciortino]{}, vok. 198 of Astrmnomical Sociedy oy the Pacific Conference Series, 421.
Verbtnt, F., & Lhlnney, E. S. 1995, A&A, 296, 709
, R. K. S., [Fedih]{}, L. R., [Piotto]{}, G., [Anderson]{}, J., [Cassisi]{}, S., [Villanmva]{}, S., [Platais]{}, I., [Pasquini]{}, L., [Momany]{}, Y., & [Sahar]{}, G. 2008,, 484, 609.
, J.-P. 1989,, 220, 112
---
abstrach: 'We presenj an umplementatiun of rangt veparated runctionals utilizing the Slatef-funccion on gries in teal space ii the irojector augmented wdves meyhod. The screeked Pmiswon equation is solvev to evaluate the nesessary swrzened exchange integrqlw on Wartasiav grkds. Tie jmplemfntetion is vedified agaibst existing literauurq and applied fo the dqscription of charge transfer excitatiots. Se find very slow conveegence for calculatiojs within linear response time-dependent density functional theocy anb unoczypled orbitals of the canonical Fock operator. Cjhvtrgvnce can be severcly improved by usonh Nozinaga’s virtuxl orbnfams instead. This colbinatijn fuethermore enanles an accurate determinatuon of long-rcngw charge transfer zxcitations yy meams of ground-state calculatious.'
authkr:
- Rolf
- Micjael
biblikeraphy:
- './Yukawa\_GPAD.bin'
tidle: Charge transfer excitaeions witi ranye separxted functyonals usijg imisoved virtual orbihals
---
Iutrodgction
============
The dtudy of intra-molecular charge vcansfer excitsthonv (CTE) is of ikterest in photjvoltaics[@saricnftci_phocoinduzed_1992], organib electroiics[@samori_epytaxial_2002] and mmpecular and mrganic iagnwtisn[@blundeuu_organic_2004]. Withim a singlv karticle pucture, the simplesb CTE js the excitatiin if an electron groo tre hmghese molecular | . 1999, A&A, 347, 866 , M., [Tagliaferri]{}, [Belloni]{}, T., L., & [Platais]{}, F. in Stellar Clusters Associations: Convection, Rotation, Dynamos, edited by R. [Pallavicini]{}, G. & S. [Sciortino]{}, vol. 198 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Verbunt, F., & Phinney, E. S. 1995, A&A, 296, 709 , R. K. [Bedin]{}, R., G., J., [Cassisi]{}, S., [Villanova]{}, S., [Platais]{}, I., [Pasquini]{}, L., [Momany]{}, Y., & [Sagar]{}, R. 2008,, 484, , J.-P. 1989,, 220, 112 --- abstract: 'We an implementation of range functionals utilizing the Slater-function on in space in projector waves The screened Poisson is solved to evaluate the necessary screened exchange integrals on Cartesian grids. The implementation is verified against literature and the description charge excitations. find very slow calculations within linear response time-dependent density unoccupied orbitals of the canonical Fock operator. Convergence be severely by using Huzinaga’s virtual orbitals instead. combination furthermore enables an accurate determination of long-range transfer excitations by means of ground-state calculations.' author: - Rolf - Michael bibliography: - './Yukawa\_GPAW.bib' transfer excitations with range functionals using improved orbitals Introduction The of intra-molecular transfer excitations (CTE) is of interest in photovoltaics[@sariciftci_photoinduced_1992], organic electronics[@samori_epitaxial_2002] and and organic magnetism[@blundell_organic_2004]. Within a single particle picture, the simplest the of an electron the highest molecular | . 1999, A&A, 347, 866
, M., [Verbunt]{}, F., [Tagliaferri]{}, G., [BeLloni]{}, T., [BediN]{}, L., & [PlaTaiS]{}, I. 2012, APJ (SubmItteD)
, F. 2000, in Stellar CluSTers And Associations: ConvectIon, RoTaTIon, aND DYnamoS, edited BY R. [pALlaViCiNi]{}, G. [miCElA]{}, & S. [SciOrtIno]{}, vol. 198 oF AstronomiCal soCiety of the PaCIfIc ConferenCe SEries, 421.
Verbunt, f., & PhInney, E. s. 1995, A&a, 296, 709
, R. K. s., [bedin]{}, l. R., [PIotto]{}, g., [AnderSOn]{}, J., [CasSisi]{}, S., [VillAnOVa]{}, S., [PlaTAis]{}, I., [PasQUInI]{}, L., [MoMany]{}, Y., & [Sagar]{}, R. 2008,, 484, 609.
, J.-P. 1989,, 220, 112
---
abstRAcT: 'we present an impLementAtIOn OF RanGe sEparated fuNcTionaLS utilizINg THE slaTEr-function on gRids in real sPAce In the pRoJecTOr augmEnted WaVEs mEthod. The scrEeneD Poisson eQuatioN Is solveD To evaluAte the NecEssAry sCReEnEd eXcHAngE InTegRAls On CartesIaN gRids. THe imPLEMEntaTioN is vErifiEd against exisTinG litERatUre anD applIed tO tHe desCriptiOn of cHaRge transfer exciTatiOns. We find VerY sLow CoNvergENce for CalCulAtions wIthin liNEar ReSPONsE time-dependent densItY FUnCtional tHeory aND uNoCCupied orBiTalS of tHE CanonIcal fOcK operatoR. ConveRGeNcE can be sEvErely iMpRovEd bY usinG huziNaga’s vIrtual orBitalS Instead. This comBInation furtheRMoRE EnABles An aCcurate deteRminATion Of loNG-rAngE ChargE tranSfER eXCitations by means of gRoUnd-staTe calCulations.'
authOr:
- Rolf
- MichAEL
BibliogrAphy:
- './yUkAWa\_GPAW.bib'
title: chargE transfer eXCitationS with Range sepArated funCTIonals usIng ImpRovEd vIRTuAl orbitals
---
IntRODuctIoN
============
The stuDy oF intra-mOleCulAr cHarGe Transfer eXcitatioNs (cTe) iS oF inTeresT In photovOlTaiCs[@SarIciftCI_photoInducEd_1992], orGaNiC EleCtronicS[@SaMORi_epItAxIal_2002] aNd mOlEculaR and ORgaNic magnEtism[@blunDelL_OrgaNiC_2004]. WIthin a sIngle particle PiCture, the siMpLesT CTE is THE excitatIon of an electron from the hIGhest moLecUlar | . 1999, A&A, 347, 866
, M ., [Verbun t]{}, F. , [ Ta glia ferr i]{}, G., [Bel l oni] {}, T., [Bedin]{}, L., & [P la t ais] { }, I. 2 012, Ap J ( s u bmi tt ed )
,F .2000, in Stella r Clusters an dAssociations : C onvection, Ro tation, andDyn amos,ed ite d by R . [ Palla vicini ] {}, G. [Micela] {} , & S.[ Sciorti n o ]{ }, v ol. 198 of Astron o mi c al Society ofthe Pa ci f ic C onf ere nce Series ,421.Verbunt , F . , & P h inney, E. S.1995, A&A,2 96, 709
,R.K . S.,[Bedi n] { },L. R., [Pio tto] {}, G., [ Anders o n]{}, J . , [Cass isi]{} , S .,[Vil l an ov a]{ }, S., [P lat a is] {}, I.,[P as quini ]{}, L . , [Mo man y]{} , Y., & [Sagar]{}, R. 200 8 ,,484,609.
, J .- P. 19 89,, 2 20, 1 12
---
abstract: 'We presentanim ple me ntati o n of r ang e s eparate d funct i ona ls u t il izing the Slater-f un c t io n on gri ds inr ea ls pace inth e p roje c t or au gmen t ed waves m ethod. Th escreene dPoisso nequ ati on is solv ed toevaluate then ecessary scree n ed exchange i n te g r al s onCar tesian grid s. T h e im plem e nt ati o n isverif ie d a g ainst existing lite ra ture a nd ap plied to thedescriptio n o f charge tra n sf e r excitations. We f ind very s l ow conve rgenc e for ca lculation s within l ine arres pon s e t ime-dependent d ensi ty functi ona l theor y a nduno ccu pi ed orbita ls of th eca no ni cal Fock operator .Con ve rge nce c a n be s evere ly i mp ro v edby usin g H u z inag a’ svirt ual o rbita ls i n ste ad. Thi s combina tio n fur th er more en ables an accu ra te determi na tio n of l o n g-rangecharge transfer excitat i ons bymea ns of gro und-state ca lculat ion s .'
aut hor:
- Rolf
- Mi c h ael
b i b li ogr ap hy:
- './Y u k awa \_GPA W. bib'
title: Charge transfer e x cit ations with r ang e se p a ra ted fu n cti on a lsu s ing improved vi rtual orbi ta l s---
Intro d uct io n
===== =======
The study o f intra-m olecularch arge t ran sfer excit ations ( CTE) is o f inte r es t inpho tovolt ai cs[ @sari ciftci _ pho toind uced_1 99 2], or ganic e lectroni cs[@samori_epitaxial_20 02] an d mol ecu lar and o rga n icmagnetism [@bl undell_org ani c_2 004]. Wi t hin a sin g le pa r ticle pic t ure, thes im ple s t C TE is the e x c i tat ion o f a n elect ronfrom the highestm olecular | . 1999,_A&A, 347,_866
, M., [Verbunt]{}, F.,_[Tagliaferri]{}, G.,_[Belloni]{},_T., [Bedin]{},_L.,_& [Platais]{}, I._2012, ApJ (submitted)
,_F. 2000, in Stellar_Clusters and Associations:_Convection,_Rotation, and Dynamos, edited by R. [Pallavicini]{}, G. [Micela]{}, & S. [Sciortino]{}, vol. 198 of Astronomical Society_of_the Pacific_Conference_Series,_421.
Verbunt, F., & Phinney, E. S._1995, A&A, 296, 709
, R. K. S.,_[Bedin]{}, L. R.,_[Piotto]{}, G., [Anderson]{}, J., [Cassisi]{}, S., [Villanova]{}, S.,_[Platais]{},_I., [Pasquini]{}, L.,_[Momany]{}, Y., & [Sagar]{}, R. 2008,, 484, 609.
, J.-P._1989,, 220, 112
---
abstract: 'We present_an implementation of_range_separated_functionals utilizing the Slater-function_on grids in real space in_the projector augmented waves method. The_screened Poisson equation is solved to evaluate_the necessary screened exchange integrals on_Cartesian grids. The implementation is_verified against_existing literature and applied to_the description of_charge transfer_excitations. We find_very slow convergence for calculations within_linear response time-dependent_density functional theory and unoccupied orbitals_of_the canonical Fock_operator._Convergence_can be_severely improved by_using_Huzinaga’s virtual_orbitals_instead. This combination furthermore enables an_accurate_determination of long-range charge transfer excitations by_means of ground-state calculations.'
author:
-_Rolf
-_Michael
bibliography:
- './Yukawa\_GPAW.bib'
title: Charge transfer_excitations with range separated functionals_using improved virtual orbitals
---
Introduction
============
The study of_intra-molecular charge_transfer excitations_(CTE) is of interest in photovoltaics[@sariciftci_photoinduced_1992], organic electronics[@samori_epitaxial_2002] and molecular and_organic magnetism[@blundell_organic_2004]. Within a single particle_picture, the simplest CTE_is the_excitation_of an electron_from_the highest_molecular |
\,,$$ where overdot denotes differentiation with respect to time. Bellow we shall represent the Hamiltonian corresponding to Lagrangian (\[eq:bilag\]) in terms of a special parameterization, adapted to the action of ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ symmetry group of the system. We shall demonstrate that on the Principal orbit stratum of ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action the resulting Hamiltonian defines a new generalization of the Calogero-Sutherland-Moser model by introducing two internal variables “spin” and “isospin”. Furthermore, performing the Hamiltonian reduction owing to two types of symmetry: continuous and discrete, we show how to arrive at the conventional Hamiltonian of Euler-Calogero-Sutherland model $$\label{eq:ECS}
H = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2 +
\frac{1}{8} \sum_{i \not=j}^n \frac{l^2_{ij}}{\sinh^2(x_i-x_j)}$$ with internal variables $l_{ab} = - \, l_{ba}$, obeying the ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ Poisson bracket algebra $$\{l_{ab}, l_{cd} \} =
\delta_{ac} l_{bd} - \delta_{ad} l_{bc} +
\delta_{bd} l_{ac} - \delta_{bc} l_{ad}
\,.$$
Another interesting systems arise when the dynamics takes place on the Singular orbit strata of the ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action. We found in this case new models representing a certain class of mass deformed Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models. In particular, for the case of ${GL(3, \mathbb{R})}$ group, our analysis shows that the dynamics on Singular orbit stratum with isotropy group $SO(2)\otimes Z_2$, corresponds to Calogero-Moser-Sutherland model, describing two particles, whose mass ratios is $m_1 : m_2 = 2 : 1$ (see eq. (\[eq:HSOr2\])). The question of integrability of the mass deformed Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models has been discussed in [@Veselov] and references therein.
Geodesic motion on the Principal orbit stratum
================================ | \,,$$ where overdot denotes differentiation with respect to time. Bellow we shall constitute the Hamiltonian correspond to Lagrangian (\[eq: bilag\ ]) in terms of a special parameterization, adapted to the natural process of $ { SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ symmetry group of the system. We shall show that on the Principal orbit stratum of $ { SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group military action the resulting Hamiltonian defines a modern generalization of the Calogero - Sutherland - Moser model by insert two internal variables “ spin ” and “ isospin ”. Furthermore, performing the Hamiltonian reduction owing to two type of symmetry: continuous and discrete, we show how to arrive at the conventional Hamiltonian of Euler - Calogero - Sutherland mannequin $ $ \label{eq: ECS }
H = \frac{1}{2 } \sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2 +
\frac{1}{8 } \sum_{i \not = j}^n \frac{l^2_{ij}}{\sinh^2(x_i - x_j)}$$ with internal variables $ l_{ab } = - \, l_{ba}$, obeying the $ { SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ Poisson bracket algebra $ $ \{l_{ab }, l_{cd } \ } =
\delta_{ac } l_{bd } - \delta_{ad } l_{bc } +
\delta_{bd } l_{ac } - \delta_{bc } l_{ad }
\,.$$
Another interesting system arise when the dynamics takes place on the Singular orbit level of the $ { SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action. We found in this case new models representing a certain class of mass deformed Calogero - Moser - Sutherland models. In particular, for the case of $ { GL(3, \mathbb{R})}$ group, our analysis shows that the dynamics on Singular orbit class with isotropy group $ SO(2)\otimes Z_2 $, corresponds to Calogero - Moser - Sutherland model, identify two particle, whose mass ratios is $ m_1: m_2 = 2: 1 $ (see eq. (\[eq: HSOr2\ ]) ). The doubt of integrability of the mass deformed Calogero - Moser - Sutherland models has been discussed in [ @Veselov ] and reference therein.
Geodesic motion on the Principal orbit stratum
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = | \,,$$ whfre overdot denotes difftrentiation with tewpect vo time. Bellow de shall represent the Hamilvoniqn coeresponding to Lagrangkan (\[eq:bilwg\]) in teems id a special paramebzrizaflon, aba'ted to the actlon of ${SO(n, \kathbb{R})}$ symmetsy gxoup of the system. We shall demonstrwte thay ln the Principwl ogbyt sfgauum of ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action tge resunting Hamiltomian defines a new generallzatlon of the Calogerl-Sutherland-Nosew model by ingroducing uwm internal variables “spin” and “isospin”. Furghermpre, perfornibg hve Hamiltonman requction owinn to twm types of symmetry: cpntmnuoys and discrete, we shmw how to arrive aj the convancional Hamiltonian of Eyler-Cdlogaro-Sjrheflahd mkdel $$\lwbem{eq:ECS}
H = \fdac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n p_u^2 +
\frac{1}{8} \sum_{i \not=j}^n \ftas{o^2_{ij}}{\sinh^2(x_i-x_j)}$$ wjth ineewnal variables $l_{ab} = - \, l_{ba}$, obeying the ${SM(n, \jathbb{R})}$ Poisson bracket algebra $$\{l_{ab}, l_{cd} \} =
\delja_{ac} l_{bd} - \qelta_{ad} l_{bc} +
\delta_{bd} l_{ac} - \delta_{bc} l_{ad}
\,.$$
Another interastinj rysuens arkwe when the dynamics takes place on the Singulaw otbpt strata of the ${FO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ ggoik action. We foond in cgia case new models gepresegting a certaig clsss of mass deformed Calogeeo-Moser-Sutheglane models. In particblar, for the casg of ${GK(3, \mathbb{R})}$ group, our anauysia shows thah the dynzoics on Singular ornit stratum with isotropy grotp $SO(2)\otimxs Z_2$, eorrespovds jo Calodero-Moser-Sktherland model, describijg twl [articles, ahose mass ratios is $m_1 : m_2 = 2 : 1$ (sxx eq. (\[eq:HSOr2\])). Tne quvstion of intenrability of thq mass deformeb Calogexo-Mosef-Sutherlans modelv has been qiscussed in [@Egselov] and reherences eherwin.
Gwodesic ootion on the Lrincipal orbit strqtum
================================ | \,,$$ where overdot denotes differentiation with respect Bellow shall represent Hamiltonian corresponding to a parameterization, adapted to action of ${SO(n, symmetry group of the system. We demonstrate that on the Principal orbit stratum of ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action the Hamiltonian defines a new generalization of the Calogero-Sutherland-Moser model by introducing two internal “spin” “isospin”. performing Hamiltonian reduction owing to two types of symmetry: continuous and discrete, we show how to arrive the conventional Hamiltonian of Euler-Calogero-Sutherland model $$\label{eq:ECS} H \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2 + \sum_{i \not=j}^n \frac{l^2_{ij}}{\sinh^2(x_i-x_j)}$$ with internal $l_{ab} - \, obeying ${SO(n, Poisson bracket algebra l_{cd} \} = \delta_{ac} l_{bd} - \delta_{ad} l_{bc} + \delta_{bd} l_{ac} - \delta_{bc} l_{ad} \,.$$ Another interesting arise when takes place the orbit of the ${SO(n, action. We found in this case a certain class of mass deformed Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models. particular, for case of ${GL(3, \mathbb{R})}$ group, our shows that the dynamics on Singular orbit stratum isotropy group $SO(2)\otimes Z_2$, corresponds to Calogero-Moser-Sutherland model, describing two particles, whose mass ratios is m_2 = 2 : (see eq. (\[eq:HSOr2\])). question integrability the deformed Calogero-Moser-Sutherland has been discussed in [@Veselov] and references therein. Geodesic motion on Principal orbit stratum ================================ | \,,$$ where overdot denotes differEntiation wIth reSpeCt tO tIme. BElloW we shall represENt thE Hamiltonian correspondIng to laGRangIAn (\[Eq:bilAg\]) in terMS oF A SpeCiAl ParAmETeRizatIon, Adapted To the actioN of ${sO(N, \mathbb{R})}$ symmETrY group of thE syStem. We shall dEmoNstratE tHat ON the PRinCipal Orbit sTRatum oF ${SO(n, \mathbB{R})}$ GRoup acTIon the rESUlTing hamiltonian defineS A nEW generalizatioN of the caLOgERO-SuTheRland-Moser MoDel by INtroducINg TWO IntERnal variables “Spin” and “isosPIn”. FUrtherMoRe, pERformiNg the haMIltOnian reductIon oWing to two Types oF SymmetrY: ContinuOus and DisCreTe, we SHoW hOw tO aRRivE At The COnvEntional haMiLtoniAn of eULER-CalOgeRo-SuTherlAnd model $$\label{Eq:EcS}
H = \fRAc{1}{2} \sUm_{i=1}^n p_I^2 +
\frac{1}{8} \Sum_{i \NoT=j}^n \frAc{l^2_{ij}}{\sInh^2(x_i-X_j)}$$ With internal varIablEs $l_{ab} = - \, l_{ba}$, oBeyInG thE ${So(n, \matHBb{R})}$ PoiSsoN brAcket alGebra $$\{l_{aB}, L_{cd} \} =
\DeLTA_{Ac} L_{bd} - \delta_{ad} l_{bc} +
\delta_{Bd} L_{AC} - \dElta_{bc} l_{aD}
\,.$$
AnothER iNtEResting sYsTemS ariSE When tHe dyNAmIcs takes Place oN ThE SIngular OrBit strAtA of The ${sO(n, \maTHbb{R})}$ Group aCtion. We fOund iN This case new modELs representinG A cERTaIN claSs oF mass deformEd CaLOgerO-MosER-SUthERland ModelS. IN PaRTicular, for the case of ${gL(3, \Mathbb{r})}$ grouP, our analysis sHows that thE DYNamics on singULaR Orbit stratum wiTh isoTropy group $so(2)\otimes Z_2$, CorreSponds to calogero-MOSEr-SutherLanD moDel, DesCRIbIng two particlES, WhosE mAss ratiOs iS $m_1 : m_2 = 2 : 1$ (see eQ. (\[eq:hSOR2\])). ThE quEsTion of intEgrabiliTy Of ThE mAss DeforMEd CalogeRo-mosEr-sutHerlaND modelS has bEen dIsCuSSed In [@VeselOV] aND RefeReNcEs thEreIn.
geodeSic mOTioN on the PRincipal oRbiT StraTuM
================================ | \,,$$ where overdot denote s differen tiati onwit hresp ectto time. Bello w weshall represent the Ha milto ni a n co r re spond ing toL ag r a ngi an ( \[e q: b il ag\]) in termsof a speci alpa rameterizati o n, adapted t o t he action of ${ SO(n,\m ath b b{R}) }$symme try gr o up ofthe syste m. We sha l l demon s t ra te t hat on the Princi p al orbit stratumof ${S O( n ,\ m ath bb{ R})}$ grou pactio n the re s ul t i n g H a miltonian def ines a newg ene raliza ti ono f theCalog er o -Su therland-Mo sermodel byintrod u cing tw o intern al var iab les “sp i n” a nd“i s osp i n” . F u rth ermore,pe rf ormin g th e H a milt oni an r educt ion owing totwo typ e s o f sym metry : co nt inuou s anddiscr et e, we show howto a rrive atthe c onv en tiona l Hamil ton ian of Eul er-Calo g ero -S u t h er land model $$\labe l{ e q :E CS}
H =\frac{ 1 }{ 2} \sum_{i= 1} ^np_i^ 2 +
\fr ac{1 } {8 } \sum_{ i \not = j} ^n \frac{ l^ 2_{ij} }{ \si nh^ 2(x_i - x_j) }$$ wi th inter nal v a riables $l_{ab } = - \, l_{ba } $, o be y ingthe ${SO(n, \m athb b {R}) }$ P o is son brack et al ge b ra $$\{l_{ab}, l_{cd}\} =
\de lta_{ ac} l_{bd} -\delta_{ad } l _{bc} +\del t a_ { bd} l_{ac} - \ delta _{bc} l_{a d }
\,.$$
Anot her inte resting s y s tems ari sewhe n t hed y na mics takes pl a c e on t he Sing ula r orbit st rat a o f t he ${SO(n,\mathbb{ R} )} $gr oup acti o n. We fo un d i nthi s cas e new m odels rep re se n tin g a cer t ai n clas sof mas s d ef ormed Cal o ger o-Moser -Sutherla ndm odel s. I n parti cular, for th ecase of ${ GL (3, \math b b {R})}$ g roup, our analysis show s that t hedynam icson Singul arorbitstr a tum wi th iso tropy g rou p $SO(2 ) \ ot ime sZ_2$, corr e s pon ds to C alog ero-Mos er-Sutherland mode l , d escribing two pa rtic l e s, wh o se mas sr ati o s is $m_1 : m_2= 2 : 1$ ( se e e q. (\[eq:H S Or2 \] )). The questi on of integra bility of the mass d efor m e d C alogero-Mo ser-Suth erland mo d els h a sbeendis cussed i n [ @Vese lov] a n d r efere nces t he rein.
Geod es ic motio n on the Principal orbi t stra tum
= === ========= === = === ========= === | \,,$$ where_overdot denotes_differentiation with respect to_time. Bellow_we_shall represent_the_Hamiltonian corresponding to_Lagrangian (\[eq:bilag\]) in_terms of a special_parameterization, adapted to_the_action of ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ symmetry group of the system. We shall demonstrate that on_the_Principal orbit_stratum_of_${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ group action the_resulting Hamiltonian defines a new_generalization of_the Calogero-Sutherland-Moser model by introducing two internal variables_“spin”_and “isospin”. Furthermore,_performing the Hamiltonian reduction owing to two types of_symmetry: continuous and discrete, we show_how to arrive_at_the_conventional Hamiltonian of Euler-Calogero-Sutherland_model $$\label{eq:ECS}
H = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2_+
\frac{1}{8} \sum_{i \not=j}^n \frac{l^2_{ij}}{\sinh^2(x_i-x_j)}$$ with internal_variables $l_{ab} = - \, l_{ba}$, obeying_the ${SO(n, \mathbb{R})}$ Poisson bracket algebra_$$\{l_{ab}, l_{cd} \} =
\delta_{ac} l_{bd}_- \delta_{ad}_l_{bc} +
\delta_{bd} l_{ac} - \delta_{bc}_l_{ad}
\,.$$
Another interesting systems_arise when_the dynamics takes_place on the Singular orbit strata_of the ${SO(n,_\mathbb{R})}$ group action. We found in_this_case new models_representing_a_certain class_of mass deformed_Calogero-Moser-Sutherland_models. In_particular,_for the case of ${GL(3, \mathbb{R})}$_group,_our analysis shows that the dynamics on_Singular orbit stratum with_isotropy_group $SO(2)\otimes Z_2$, corresponds_to Calogero-Moser-Sutherland model, describing two_particles, whose mass ratios is $m_1_: m_2_= 2_: 1$ (see eq. (\[eq:HSOr2\])). The question of integrability of the_mass deformed Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models has been_discussed in [@Veselov] and_references therein.
Geodesic_motion_on the Principal_orbit_stratum
================================ |
f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^{**}=p_{\mu^{-1}}({\bf f^*},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^*$ is uniformly smooth.
A remark regarding the sharpness of our results is now in order. Under the generality of the hypotheses of Theorem \[uniform monotonicity with 1-coercive modulus is recessive\], even when given that for each $i\in I$, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_i$ is the largest possible modulus of monotonicity of $A_i$, it does not hold that ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=p_{\frac{\mu}{2}}(\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}},\boldsymbol{\lambda})$ is necessarily the largest possible modulus of monotonicity of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$. In fact, the largest modulus of monotonicity of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$ cannot, in general, be expressed only in terms of $\mu,\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ and $\boldsymbol{\lambda}$ but depends also on $\bold{A}$. To this end, we consider the following example which illustrates a similar situation for functions and, consequently, for their subdifferential operators. We will illustrate this issue outside the class of subdifferential operators in Example \[strong sharpness counter outside subdeifferentials\] of the following subsection.
\[uniform counter example\] Let $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ be a proper, lower semicontinuous and convex function such that ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Among a rich variety of choices, one can choose $f=\iota_C$ where $C$ is a closed half-space. For such a choice of $f$, one easily verifies that, indeed, by their definitions, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Then it follows that $f$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. Consequently, Fact \[gage conjugation\] implies that also $f^*$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. However, employing formula , we see that $p(f,f^*)=q$ which is both, uniformly convex and uniformly smooth (in fact, as we recall in the following subsection, $q$ is strongly convex and strongly smooth). Thus, we | f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^{**}=p_{\mu^{-1}}({\bf f^*},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^*$ is uniformly smooth.
A remark regarding the sharpness of our results is nowadays in decree. Under the generality of the hypotheses of Theorem \[uniform monotonicity with 1 - coercive modulus is recessive\ ], even when given that for each $ i\in I$, $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}_i$ is the large possible modulus of monotonicity of $ A_i$, it does not hold that $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}=p_{\frac{\mu}{2}}(\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}},\boldsymbol{\lambda})$ is inevitably the largest possible modulus of monotonicity of $ { \ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$. In fact, the largest modulus of monotonicity of $ { \ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$ cannot, in cosmopolitan, be carry only in term of $ \mu,\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ and $ \boldsymbol{\lambda}$ but depends also on $ \bold{A}$. To this end, we consider the following example which illustrates a alike situation for functions and, consequently, for their subdifferential operators. We will exemplify this issue outside the class of subdifferential operator in Example \[strong sharpness counter outside subdeifferentials\ ] of the come subsection.
\[uniform counter example\ ] Let $ f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ be a proper, lower semicontinuous and convex function such that $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0 $ and $ \psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Among a rich variety of option, one can choose $ f=\iota_C$ where $ C$ is a closed half - space. For such a choice of $ f$, one easily verifies that, indeed, by their definitions, $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0 $ and $ \psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Then it follows that $ f$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. Consequently, Fact \[gage conjugation\ ] implies that also $ f^*$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. However, employing formula , we see that $ p(f, f^*)=q$ which is both, uniformly convex and uniformly smooth (in fact, as we recall in the following subsection, $ q$ is powerfully convex and powerfully smooth). Thus, we | f},{\blldsymbol \lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\buldsymbol \lambdc})^{**}=p_{\mu^{-1}}({\bf h^*},{\boldsyjbol \lamcda})^*$ is uniformly smooth.
A remerk eegareing the sharpness of uur resulns is now in ieder. Under the gencxalitg of chx hypotheses of Theorem \[unhform monotoniwigy with 1-coercive modulus is recessive\], even wnej given that fjr essh $i\jn I$, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_i$ is the largsst posvible modulus of monotonicity of $A_i$, it foes not hold that ${\enskremath{\varpyi}}=p_{\fwqc{\mu}{2}}(\boldsymbul{{\ensuremauh{\rarphi}}},\boldsimbol{\lambda})$ is necessarily the lxrgesc possible noeulkv of monotoiicity of ${\ensuremabn{\mathcdl{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lsmbva})}}$. Ib fact, the largest movulus of monotoniciti of ${\ensuramcth{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldwynbol \nambga})}}$ cxbnog, ih jensral, bf eepressed onmy in terms of $\mu,\boldsymbol{{\ensirqnath{\varphi}}}$ ans $\boldfyibol{\lambda}$ but depends also on $\bold{A}$. To thjs end, we consider the dollowing example whifh illustwates a similar situation for functions and, consexuentmh, fir gyelr subdifferential operators. We will illustraes uhix issue outsidc the class of subcivfrtential operaturs in Exzmple \[strong sharpnfss cougter iutside stbdeofferentials\] of the followibg subsectiou.
\[unuform counter exam'le\] Let $f:{\ensbrematn{\mathval H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\inyty,+\inffy\right]}}$ be w proper, muwer semicontinuuus atd convex function such thwt ${\ensurenath{\rarphi}}_f=0$ xnd $\ksi_f=\iotw_{\{0\}}$. Among a gich ydriety of choices, lne ccn chmose $f=\iota_F$ where $C$ is a closed half-space. For such a chpiwe mf $f$, one easiky verifies trat, indeed, by jheir defnnitiovs, ${\ensuremzth{\varpii}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\yota_{\{0\}}$. Then it xlllows that $h$ is neitrer ynifirmly cuvvex nor unifotmly smoonh. Conwequently, Fact \[gage covnugation\] impliew tyat also $f^*$ is nritfer ujihormlr convex nor gnifurmuu smouth. Howtrer, dmplpying formula , we see thaf $p(f,f^*)=q$ which is boyh, uniformoy convev and uniformky smooth (in fact, ws we rerall im tre following subsection, $q$ is sfrongly clnvcx and strongjy snooth). Thus, wz | f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^{**}=p_{\mu^{-1}}({\bf f^*},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^*$ is A regarding the of our results the of the hypotheses Theorem \[uniform monotonicity 1-coercive modulus is recessive\], even when that for each $i\in I$, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_i$ is the largest possible modulus of monotonicity $A_i$, it does not hold that ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=p_{\frac{\mu}{2}}(\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}},\boldsymbol{\lambda})$ is necessarily the largest possible modulus monotonicity ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf \lambda})}}$. fact, the largest modulus of monotonicity of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$ cannot, in general, be expressed only terms of $\mu,\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ and $\boldsymbol{\lambda}$ but depends also $\bold{A}$. To this end, consider the following example which a situation for and, for subdifferential operators. We illustrate this issue outside the class of subdifferential operators in Example \[strong sharpness counter outside subdeifferentials\] of following subsection. example\] Let H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ a lower semicontinuous and such that ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Among of choices, one can choose $f=\iota_C$ where $C$ a closed For such a choice of $f$, easily verifies that, indeed, by their definitions, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Then it follows that $f$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. Consequently, Fact implies that also $f^*$ neither uniformly convex uniformly However, formula we see $p(f,f^*)=q$ which is both, uniformly convex and uniformly smooth (in fact, we recall in the following subsection, $q$ is strongly convex smooth). we | f},{\boldsymbol \lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\boLdsymbol \laMbda})^{**}=p_{\Mu^{-1}}({\bF f^*},{\bOlDsymBol \lAmbda})^*$ is uniformLY smoOth.
A remark regarding the SharpNeSS of oUR rEsultS is now iN OrDER. UnDeR tHe gEnERaLity oF thE hypothEses of TheoRem \[UnIform monotonICiTy with 1-coerCivE modulus is reCesSive\], evEn WheN Given ThaT for eAch $i\in i$, ${\EnsureMath{\varphI}}_i$ IS the laRGest posSIBlE modUlus of monotonicitY Of $a_I$, it does not hold That ${\enSuREmATH{\vaRphI}}=p_{\frac{\mu}{2}}(\boLdSymboL{{\EnsuremATh{\VARPhi}}},\BOldsymbol{\lambDa})$ is necessaRIly The larGeSt pOSsible ModulUs OF moNotonicity oF ${\ensUremath{\maThcal{R}_{\MU}({\bf A},{\bolDSymbol \lAmbda})}}$. IN faCt, tHe laRGeSt ModUlUS of MOnOtoNIciTy of ${\ensuReMaTh{\matHcal{r}_{\MU}({\BF A},{\boLdsYmboL \lambDa})}}$ cannot, in genEraL, be eXPreSsed oNly in TermS oF $\mu,\boLdsymbOl{{\ensUrEmath{\varphi}}}$ and $\bOldsYmbol{\lambDa}$ bUt DepEnDs alsO On $\bold{a}$. To ThiS end, we cOnsider THe fOlLOWInG example which illusTrATEs A similar SituatIOn FoR FunctionS aNd, cOnseQUEntly, For tHEiR subdiffErentiAL oPeRators. WE wIll illUsTraTe tHis isSUe ouTside tHe class oF subdIFferential operATors in Example \[STrONG sHArpnEss Counter outsIde sUBdeiFferENtIalS\] Of the FolloWiNG sUBsection.
\[uniform counTeR exampLe\] Let $F:{\ensuremath{\maThcal H}}\to{\enSUREmath{\,\lefT]-\infTY,+\iNFty\right]}}$ be a proPer, loWer semiconTInuous anD convEx functiOn such thaT ${\ENsurematH{\vaRphI}}_f=0$ aNd $\pSI_F=\iOta_{\{0\}}$. Among a rich VARietY oF choiceS, onE can choOse $F=\ioTa_C$ WheRe $c$ is a closeD half-spaCe. foR sUcH a cHoice OF $f$, one easIlY veRiFieS that, INdeed, bY theiR defInItIOns, ${\EnsuremATh{\VARphi}}_F=0$ aNd $\Psi_f=\IotA_{\{0\}}$. THen it FollOWs tHat $f$ is nEither uniForMLy coNvEx Nor unifOrmly smooth. CoNsEquently, FaCt \[GagE conjuGATion\] implIes that also $f^*$ is neither unIFormly cOnvEx nor UnifOrmly smooTh. HOwever, EmpLOying fOrmula , We see ThAt $p(F,F^*)=Q$ whicH IS bOth, UnIformly conVEX anD unifOrMly sMooth (in Fact, as we recall in thE FolLowing subsectIon, $Q$ is sTROnGly COnVEx aNd STroNGLy smooth). Thus, we | f},{\boldsymbol \lambda}) =p_\mu({\b f f}, {\b old sy mbol \la mbda})^{**}=p_ { \mu^ {-1}}({\bf f^*},{\bold symbo l\ lamb d a} )^*$is unif o rm l y sm oo th .
Ar em ark r ega rding t he sharpne ssof our results is now in or der . Under thegen eralit yoft he hy pot heses of Th e orem \ [uniformmo n otonic i ty with 1 -c oerc ive modulus is re c es s ive\], even wh en giv en th a t fo r e ach $i\inI$ , ${\ e nsurema t h{ \ v a rph i }}_i$ is thelargest pos s ibl e modu lu s o f monot onici ty of$A_i$, it d oesnot holdthat $ { \ensure m ath{\va rphi}} =p_ {\f rac{ \ mu }{ 2}} (\ b old s ym bol { {\e nsuremat h{ \v arphi }}}, \ b o l dsym bol {\la mbda} )$ is necessa ril y th e la rgest poss ible m odulu s of m onoto ni city of ${\ensu rema th{\mathc al{ R} _{\ mu }({\b f A},{\ bol dsy mbol \l ambda}) } }$. I n f ac t, the largest mod ul u s o f monoto nicity of $ { \ensurem at h{\ math c a l{R}_ {\mu } ({ \bf A},{ \bolds y mb ol \lambd a} )}}$ c an not , i n gen e ral, be ex pressedonlyi n terms of $\m u ,\boldsymbol{ { \e n s ur e math {\v arphi}}}$ a nd $ \ bold symb o l{ \la m bda}$ butde p en d s also on $\bold{A} $. To th is en d, we conside r the foll o w i ng examp le w h ic h illustrates a simi lar situat i on for f uncti ons and, conseque n t ly, forthe irsub dif f e re ntial operato r s . We w ill ill ust rate th isiss ueout si de the cl ass of s ub di ff er ent ial o p eratorsin Ex am ple \[st r ong sh arpne ss c ou nt e r o utsides ub d e iffe re nt ials \]of thefoll o win g subse ction.
\ [un i form c ou nter ex ample\] Let $ f: {\ensurema th {\m athcal H }}\to{\e nsuremath{\,\left]-\inf t y,+\inf ty\ right ]}}$ be a pro per , lowe r s e micont inuous andco nve x funct i o nsuc hthat ${\en s u rem ath{\ va rphi }}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota _ {\{ 0\}}$. Amonga r ichv a ri ety of cho ic e s,o n e can choose $f =\iota_C$wh e re $C$ is ac los ed half-s pace. F or su c h a cho ice of $f $, one ea si ly v e r ifi es that, i ndeed, b y their d e finit i on s, ${ \en surema th {\v arphi }}_f=0 $ an d $\p si_f=\ io ta_{\{ 0\}}$ .Then itfollows that $f$ is nei ther u nifor mly convex n oru nif ormly smo oth. Consequen tly , F act \ [ga g e con juga t io n\] impli es t h at also $ f ^* $ i s ne ither unifo r m l y c onvex no r unifo rmly smooth. However, employing form ula, wesee that $ p(f,f^*)=q$ wh ich i s both, un if ormly conve x and un if o rmlysmooth (in f act, as w er ecallin t hefollowing su bs e ction,$q $i s stro ngly c onvexand st r ongl y smooth). Thus, w e | f},{\boldsymbol_\lambda})=p_\mu({\bf f},{\boldsymbol_\lambda})^{**}=p_{\mu^{-1}}({\bf f^*},{\boldsymbol \lambda})^*$ is_uniformly smooth.
A_remark_regarding the_sharpness_of our results_is now in_order. Under the generality_of the hypotheses_of_Theorem \[uniform monotonicity with 1-coercive modulus is recessive\], even when given that for each $i\in_I$,_${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_i$ is_the_largest_possible modulus of monotonicity of_$A_i$, it does not hold_that ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=p_{\frac{\mu}{2}}(\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}},\boldsymbol{\lambda})$_is necessarily the largest possible modulus of monotonicity_of_${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$._In fact, the largest modulus of monotonicity of ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}_{\mu}({\bf_A},{\boldsymbol \lambda})}}$ cannot, in general, be_expressed only in_terms_of_$\mu,\boldsymbol{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ and $\boldsymbol{\lambda}$ but_depends also on $\bold{A}$. To this_end, we consider the following example_which illustrates a similar situation for functions_and, consequently, for their subdifferential operators._We will illustrate this issue_outside the_class of subdifferential operators in_Example \[strong sharpness counter_outside subdeifferentials\]_of the following_subsection.
\[uniform counter example\] Let $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$_be a proper,_lower semicontinuous and convex function such_that_${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$._Among_a_rich variety_of choices, one_can_choose $f=\iota_C$_where_$C$ is a closed half-space. For_such_a choice of $f$, one easily verifies_that, indeed, by their_definitions,_${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f=0$ and $\psi_f=\iota_{\{0\}}$. Then_it follows that $f$ is_neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth._Consequently, Fact \[gage_conjugation\] implies_that also $f^*$ is neither uniformly convex nor uniformly smooth. However,_employing formula , we see that $p(f,f^*)=q$_which is both, uniformly_convex and_uniformly_smooth (in fact,_as_we recall_in the following subsection, $q$ is strongly_convex and_strongly smooth). Thus, we |
mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s} \right] \le
K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2}\left(\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\tfrac{d}2} \left(1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \lambda_{\cC}} \right)$$ and $$\label{e:semigroupbb}
\sup_{ t \ge 0}\E_x \left[ {\end{equation}}^{\int_0^t \left(\theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s} \mathbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cC^\cc} > t \}}\right]
\le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \left(\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\tfrac{d}2} \left( 1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \lambda_{\cC}} \right).$$
By [@Chung Proposition 1.22], each $\cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$ is a bounded regular domain. Noting that $V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(x) = V^{(a)}_{{\mathcal{Y}}\cap \cC}(x)$ for $x \in \cC \setminus {\mathcal{Y}}$, apply Lemma \[l:FK\] with $D = \cC$ and use $|\cC| \le |B_{1}| N_\cC r^d$, $N_\cC \ge 1$.
\[cor:basicestim\] For any ${\mathcal{Y}}\in {\mathscr{Y}_{\textnormal{f}}}$, $\theta \in (0,h_d]$, $a \in (0, \infty)$, $r > 4a$, $\cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$, $\gamma > \lambda_\cC$ and $x \in \cC \cap B_{r-a}({\mathcal{Y}}) \setminus B_{3a}({\mathcal{Y}})$, $$\label{e:basicestim}
\E_x \left[\exp{\int_0^{\tau_{\cC^{\cc}}} \left( \theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - | mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s } \right ] \le
K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2}\left(\frac{r}{a } \right)^{\tfrac{d}2 } \left(1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \lambda_{\cC } } \right)$$ and $ $ \label{e: semigroupbb }
\sup _ { t \ge 0}\E_x \left [ { \end{equation}}^{\int_0^t \left(\theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s } \mathbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cC^\cc } > t \}}\right ]
\le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2 } \left(\frac{r}{a } \right)^{\tfrac{d}2 } \left (1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \lambda_{\cC } } \right).$$
By [ @Chung Proposition 1.22 ], each $ \cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$ is a bounded regular domain. Noting that $ V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(x) = V^{(a)}_{{\mathcal{Y}}\cap \cC}(x)$ for $ x \in \cC \setminus { \mathcal{Y}}$, lend oneself Lemma \[l: FK\ ] with $ vitamin d = \cC$ and use $ |\cC| \le |B_{1}| N_\cC r^d$, $ N_\cC \ge 1$.
\[cor: basicestim\ ] For any $ { \mathcal{Y}}\in { \mathscr{Y}_{\textnormal{f}}}$, $ \theta \in (0,h_d]$, $ a \in (0, \infty)$, $ r > 4a$, $ \cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$, $ \gamma > \lambda_\cC$ and $ x \in \cC \cap B_{r - a}({\mathcal{Y } }) \setminus B_{3a}({\mathcal{Y}})$, $ $ \label{e: basicestim }
\E_x \left[\exp{\int_0^{\tau_{\cC^{\cc } } } \left (\theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - | matjcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd r} \right] \le
K_1 N_{\cE}^{5/2}\oeft(\frec{r}{a} \rifht)^{\tfrac{a}2} \left(1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\galmq - \lanbda_{\cC}} \right)$$ and $$\label{d:semigrouibb}
\sup_{ t \te 0}\E_e \left[ {\end{equation}}^{\int_0^t \lcyt(\thefw V^{(a)}_{\kethcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamms \right) \dd s} \mathbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cW^\cz} > t \}}\right]
\le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \left(\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\tsrac{d}2} \lrfh( 1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theua) w^{-2}}{\gamja - \lambda_{\cC}} \right).$$
By [@Chung Proposifion 1.22], eabh $\cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(t)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$ is a bounded regklar domain. Noting thah $V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{I}}(s) = D^{(q)}_{{\mathcal{Y}}\cap \cC}(x)$ for $x \in \cC \setmihus {\mathcal{Y}}$, apply Lemma \[l:FK\] witf $D = \eC$ and use $|\xC| \le |T_{1}| N_\cC r^d$, $N_\cR \ge 1$.
\[cjr:basicestim\] For any ${\mathcak{Y}}\in {\mathscr{Y}_{\tcxtnocmal{d}}}$, $\theta \in (0,h_d]$, $a \in (0, \iifty)$, $r > 4a$, $\cC \in \mathfcr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathwam{Y}}$, $\gamma > \lambda_\cX$ qnd $x \in \wC \cxp B_{f-a}({\mzticam{Y}}) \setlinns B_{3a}({\mathcam{Y}})$, $$\label{e:bawicestim}
\E_x \left[\exp{\imt_0^{\equ_{\cC^{\cc}}} \left( \tgeta V^{(w)}_{\mwthcal{Y}}(W_s) - | mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s} \right] N_{\cC}^{5/2}\left(\frac{r}{a} \left(1 + + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma \sup_{ \ge 0}\E_x \left[ \left(\theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \right) \dd s} \mathbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cC^\cc} > t \le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \left(\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\tfrac{d}2} \left( 1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \right).$$ By [@Chung Proposition 1.22], each $\cC \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$ is a bounded regular Noting $V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(x) V^{(a)}_{{\mathcal{Y}}\cap for $x \in \cC \setminus {\mathcal{Y}}$, apply Lemma \[l:FK\] with $D = \cC$ and use $|\cC| |B_{1}| N_\cC r^d$, $N_\cC \ge 1$. \[cor:basicestim\] For ${\mathcal{Y}}\in {\mathscr{Y}_{\textnormal{f}}}$, $\theta \in $a \in (0, \infty)$, $r 4a$, \in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$, > and \in \cC \cap \setminus B_{3a}({\mathcal{Y}})$, $$\label{e:basicestim} \E_x \left[\exp{\int_0^{\tau_{\cC^{\cc}}} \left( \theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - | mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s} \riGht] \le
K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2}\lEft(\frAc{r}{A} \riGhT)^{\tfrAc{d}2} \lEft(1 + \frac{\gamma + (1+\thETa) r^{-2}}{\gAmma - \lambda_{\cC}} \right)$$ and $$\laBel{e:sEmIGrouPBb}
\Sup_{ t \gE 0}\E_x \left[ {\ENd{EQUatIoN}}^{\iNt_0^t \LeFT(\tHeta V^{(A)}_{\maThcal{Y}}(W_S) - \gamma \righT) \dd S} \mAthbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cC^\cC} > T \}}\rIght]
\le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \LefT(\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\TfrAc{d}2} \lefT( 1 + \fRac{\GAmma + (1+\tHetA) r^{-2}}{\gamMa - \lambDA_{\cC}} \rigHt).$$
By [@Chung prOPositiON 1.22], each $\cC \IN \MaThscR{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$ is a bouNDeD Regular domain. NOting tHaT $v^{(a)}_{\MAThcAl{Y}}(X) = V^{(a)}_{{\mathcal{y}}\cAp \cC}(x)$ FOr $x \in \cC \SEtMINUs {\mAThcal{Y}}$, apply LeMma \[l:FK\] with $D = \Cc$ anD use $|\cC| \Le |b_{1}| N_\cc R^d$, $N_\cC \gE 1$.
\[cor:bAsICesTim\] For any ${\maThcaL{Y}}\in {\mathsCr{Y}_{\texTNormal{f}}}$, $\THeta \in (0,h_D]$, $a \in (0, \inFty)$, $R > 4a$, $\cc \in \mAThScR{C}^{(r)}_{\MaTHcaL{y}}$, $\gAmmA > \LamBda_\cC$ and $X \iN \cc \cap B_{R-a}({\maTHCAL{Y}}) \seTmiNus B_{3A}({\mathCal{Y}})$, $$\label{e:basIceStim}
\e_X \leFt[\exp{\Int_0^{\taU_{\cC^{\cC}}} \lEft( \thEta V^{(a)}_{\mAthcaL{Y}}(w_s) - | mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma\right) \d d s}\ri ght ]\le
K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \ left (\frac{r}{a} \right)^{ \tfra c{ d }2}\ le ft(1+ \frac { \g a m ma+(1 +\t he t a) r^{- 2}} {\gamma - \lambda _{\ cC }} \right)$$ an d $$\label {e: semigroupbb}
\s up_{ t \ ge0 }\E_x \l eft[{\end{ e quatio n}}^{\int _0 ^ t \lef t (\theta V ^{ (a)} _{\mathcal{Y}}(W_ s )- \gamma \right ) \dds} \m a t hbb m{1 }_{\{\tau_ {\ cC^\c c } > t \ } }\ r i g ht]
\le K_1 N_{\ cC}^{5/2} \ l eft (\frac {r }{a } \righ t)^{\ tf r ac{ d}2} \left( 1 + \frac{\g amma + (1+\the t a) r^{- 2}}{\g amm a - \la m bd a_ {\c C} } \r i gh t). $ $
By [@Chu ng P ropos itio n 1 . 22], ea ch $ \cC \ in \mathscr{C }^{ (r)} _ {\m athca l{Y}} $ is a boun ded re gular d omain. Noting t hat$V^{(a)}_ {\m at hca l{ Y}}(x ) = V^{ (a) }_{ {\mathc al{Y}}\ c ap\c C } ( x) $ for $x \in \cC \ se t m in us {\mat hcal{Y } }$ ,a pply Lem ma \[ l:FK \ ] with $D= \ cC$ anduse $| \ cC |\le |B_ {1 }| N_\ cC r^ d$, $N_\ c C \g e 1$.
\[cor:b asice s tim\] For any$ {\mathcal{Y}} \ in { \m a thsc r{Y }_{\textnor mal{ f }}}$ , $\ t he ta\ in (0 ,h_d] $, $a \in (0, \infty)$, $ r> 4a$, $\cC \in \mathscr {C}^{(r)}_ { \ m athcal{Y }}$, $\ g amma > \lambda _\cC$ and $x \i n \cC \ca p B_{ r-a}({\m athcal{Y} } ) \setmin usB_{ 3a} ({\ m a th cal{Y}})$, $$ \ l abel {e :basice sti m}
\E_x \l eft [\e xp{ \i nt_0^{\ta u_{\cC^{ \c c} }} \ lef t( \t h eta V^{( a) }_{ \m ath cal{Y } }(W_s) - | mathcal{Y}}(W_s) -_\gamma \right)_\dd s} \right] \le_
K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2}\left(\frac{r}{a}_\right)^{\tfrac{d}2}_\left(1 +_\frac{\gamma_+ (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma_- \lambda_{\cC}} \right)$$_and $$\label{e:semigroupbb}
\sup_{ t \ge_0}\E_x \left[ {\end{equation}}^{\int_0^t_\left(\theta_V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s) - \gamma \right) \dd s} \mathbbm{1}_{\{\tau_{\cC^\cc} > t \}}\right]
\le K_1 N_{\cC}^{5/2} \left(\frac{r}{a}_\right)^{\tfrac{d}2}_\left( 1_+_\frac{\gamma_+ (1+\theta) r^{-2}}{\gamma - \lambda_{\cC}}_\right).$$
By [@Chung Proposition 1.22], each $\cC_\in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$_is a bounded regular domain. Noting that $V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(x)_=_V^{(a)}_{{\mathcal{Y}}\cap \cC}(x)$ for_$x \in \cC \setminus {\mathcal{Y}}$, apply Lemma \[l:FK\] with $D_= \cC$ and use $|\cC| \le_|B_{1}| N_\cC r^d$,_$N_\cC_\ge_1$.
\[cor:basicestim\] For any ${\mathcal{Y}}\in_{\mathscr{Y}_{\textnormal{f}}}$, $\theta \in (0,h_d]$, $a \in_(0, \infty)$, $r > 4a$, $\cC_\in \mathscr{C}^{(r)}_{\mathcal{Y}}$, $\gamma > \lambda_\cC$ and $x_\in \cC \cap B_{r-a}({\mathcal{Y}}) \setminus B_{3a}({\mathcal{Y}})$,_$$\label{e:basicestim}
\E_x \left[\exp{\int_0^{\tau_{\cC^{\cc}}} \left( \theta V^{(a)}_{\mathcal{Y}}(W_s)_- |
_x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\sigma_x'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&j_y'\\#7&\sigma'&J_3' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_{xy}&\sigma&J_3\\#4&s_4&j_z\\#7&S&J \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&s_2&j_z'\\#7&S&J \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&l_y'&l_{xy}'\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\lambda&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_x+s_2+\sigma'-S}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} s_2&s_1&\sigma_x\\#4&\sigma&\sigma_x' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} s_2&\sigma_x'&\sigma\\#4&S&\sigma' \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot \frac{x y z}{x^g_{\alpha \alpha'} y^g_{\alpha \alpha'} z^g_{\alpha \alpha'}} \\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {\cal{H}}^{l_{xy}}_{l_x l_y, l_x' \lambda}(x,y,u)
\cdot {\cal{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\lambda l_z, l_y' l_z' }(y_0,z,v)\end{aligned}$$ with the constraints $\cos(\widehat{\hat{ | _ x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\ } }
\cdot { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } l_x'&\sigma_x'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&j_y'\\#7&\sigma'&J_3' \end{array}\right\}}\\
& \cdot&\displaystyle { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } l_{xy}&\sigma&J_3\\#4&s_4&j_z\\#7&S&J \end{array}\right\ } }
\cdot { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } l_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&s_2&j_z'\\#7&S&J \end{array}\right\ } }
\cdot { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } l_x'&l_y'&l_{xy}'\\#4&L&l_{yz }' \end{array}\right\}}\\
& \cdot&\displaystyle { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } l_x'&\lambda&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yz }' \end{array}\right\ } }
\cdot (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_x+s_2+\sigma'-S }
\cdot { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } s_2&s_1&\sigma_x\\#4&\sigma&\sigma_x' \end{array}\right\}}\\
& \cdot&\displaystyle { A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc } s_2&\sigma_x'&\sigma\\#4&S&\sigma' \end{array}\right\ } }
\cdot \frac{x y z}{x^g_{\alpha \alpha' } y^g_{\alpha \alpha' } z^g_{\alpha \alpha' } } \\
& \cdot&\displaystyle { \cal{H}}^{l_{xy}}_{l_x l_y, l_x' \lambda}(x, y, u)
\cdot { \cal{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\lambda l_z, l_y' l_z' } (y_0,z, v)\end{aligned}$$ with the constraints $ \cos(\widehat{\hat { | _x\\#4&s_3&j_j\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\}}
\cdut {A \left\{\begin{atrqy}{ccc} n_x'&\sigmz_x'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&j_y'\\#7&\skgma'&J_3' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\disppatstylt {A \left\{\begin{array}{czc} l_{xy}&\sigla&J_3\\#4&s_4&j_z\\#7&S&J \end{erray}\right\}}
\cdot {A \left\{\bcyin{ardwy}{cce} o_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&s_2&j_z'\\#7&S&J \end{array}\rhght\}}
\cdot {A \lext\{\ceyin{array}{ccc} l_x'&l_y'&l_{xy}'\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\righe\}}\\
&\cdot&\dosolaystyle {A \lest\{\bebyn{arday}{ccc} l_x'&\lambda&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\riggt\}}
\cdot (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_x+s_2+\sigka'-S}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{cfc} s_2&d_1&\sigma_x\\#4&\sigma&\sigma_x' \end{array}\ritht\}}\\
&\seot&\displaysthle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccd} s_2&\sigma_x'&\sigma\\#4&S&\sigma' \end{array}\rieht\}}
\cbot \frac{x y z}{z^g_{\apkha \alpha'} y^g_{\elpha \wlpha'} z^g_{\alpha \alpha'}} \\
&\wdot&\disllaystyle {\cal{H}}^{k_{xy}}_{n_x o_y, l_x' \lambda}(x,y,u)
\cdot {\ral{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\lambda l_z, l_y' j_z' }(y_0,z,v)\end{dlngned}$$ with the constrqibts $\cms(\wigehag{\yat{ | _x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\}} \cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\sigma_x'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&j_y'\\#7&\sigma'&J_3' \end{array}\right\}}\\ \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} \end{array}\right\}} \cdot \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&s_2&j_z'\\#7&S&J \end{array}\right\}} &\cdot&\displaystyle \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\lambda&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\right\}} (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_x+s_2+\sigma'-S} \cdot {A s_2&s_1&\sigma_x\\#4&\sigma&\sigma_x' \end{array}\right\}}\\ &\cdot&\displaystyle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} s_2&\sigma_x'&\sigma\\#4&S&\sigma' \cdot \frac{x y z}{x^g_{\alpha \alpha'} y^g_{\alpha \alpha'} z^g_{\alpha \alpha'}} \\ &\cdot&\displaystyle {\cal{H}}^{l_{xy}}_{l_x l_y, \lambda}(x,y,u) \cdot {\cal{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\lambda l_z, l_y' l_z' }(y_0,z,v)\end{aligned}$$ with the constraints $\cos(\widehat{\hat{ | _x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\}}
\cdOt {A \left\{\begIn{arrAy}{cCc} l_X'&\sIgma_X'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&J_y'\\#7&\sigma'&J_3' \end{arrAY}\rigHt\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {A \lefT\{\begiN{aRRay}{cCC} l_{Xy}&\sigMa&J_3\\#4&s_4&j_z\\#7&S&j \EnD{ARraY}\rIgHt\}}
\cDoT {a \lEft\{\beGin{Array}{ccC} l_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&S_2&j_z'\\#7&s&J \End{array}\righT\}}
\CdOt {A \left\{\begIn{aRray}{ccc} l_x'&l_y'&l_{Xy}'\\#4&L&L_{yz}' \end{ArRay}\RIght\}}\\
&\cDot&\DisplAystylE {a \left\{\bEgin{array}{CcC} L_x'&\lambDA&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yZ}' \ENd{ArraY}\right\}}
\cdot (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_X+S_2+\sIGma'-S}
\cdot {A \left\{\bEgin{arRaY}{CcC} S_2&S_1&\siGma_X\\#4&\sigma&\sigmA_x' \End{arRAy}\right\}}\\
&\CDoT&\DISplAYstyle {A \left\{\beGin{array}{ccc} S_2&\SigMa_x'&\sigMa\\#4&s&\siGMa' \end{aRray}\rIgHT\}}
\cdOt \frac{x y z}{x^g_{\AlphA \alpha'} y^g_{\aLpha \alPHa'} z^g_{\alpHA \alpha'}} \\
&\cDot&\disPlaYstYle {\cAL{H}}^{L_{xY}}_{l_x L_y, L_X' \laMBdA}(x,y,U)
\CdoT {\cal{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\LaMbDa l_z, l_Y' l_z' }(y_0,Z,V)\END{aliGneD}$$ witH the cOnstraints $\cos(\WidEhat{\HAt{ | _x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma& J_3 \end{a rray} \ri ght \} }
\ cdot {A \left\{\be g in{a rray}{ccc} l_x'&\sigma _x'&j _x ' \\#4 & s_ 4&j_y '\\#7&\ s ig m a '&J _3 '\en d{ a rr ay}\r igh t\}}\\
&\cdot&\d isp la ystyle {A \l e ft \{\begin{a rra y}{ccc} l_{x y}& \sigma &J _3\ \ #4&s_ 4&j _z\\# 7&S&J\ end{ar ray}\righ t\ } }
\cd o t {A \ l e ft \{\b egin{array}{ccc}l _{ x y}'&\sigma'&J_ 3'\\#4 &s _ 2& j _ z'\ \#7 &S&J \end{ ar ray}\ r ight\}} \ c d o t { A \left\{\begi n{array}{cc c } l _x'&l_ y' &l_ { xy}'\\ #4&L& l_ { yz} ' \end{arra y}\r ight\}}\\
&\cd o t&\disp l aystyle {A \l eft \{\ begi n {a rr ay} {c c c}l _x '&\ l amb da&l_{xy }\ \# 4&L&l _{yz } ' \ end{ arr ay}\ right \}}
\cdot (- )^{ s_1+ s _2- \sigm a_x+s _2+\ si gma'- S}
\c dot { A\left\{\begin{a rray }{ccc} s_ 2&s _1 &\s ig ma_x\ \ #4&\si gma &\s igma_x' \end{a r ray }\ r i g ht \}}\\
&\cdot&\dis pl a y st yle {A \ left\{ \ be gi n {array}{ cc c}s_2& \ s igma_ x'&\ s ig ma\\#4&S &\sigm a '\e nd{arra y} \right \} }
\cd ot \f r ac{x y z}{ x^g_{\al pha \ a lpha'} y^g_{\a l pha \alpha'}z ^g _ { \a l pha\al pha'}} \\
& \cdo t &\di spla y st yle {\cal {H}}^ {l _ {x y }}_{l_x l_y, l_x' \ la mbda}( x,y,u )
\cdot {\ca l{H}}^{l_{ y z } '}_{\lam bdal _z , l_y' l_z' }(y _0,z, v)\end{ali g ned}$$ w ith t he const raints $\ c o s(\wideh at{ \ha t{ | _x\\#4&s_3&j_y\\#7&\sigma&J_3 \end{array}\right\}}
_\cdot {A_\left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\sigma_x'&j_x'\\#4&s_4&j_y'\\#7&\sigma'&J_3' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle_{A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc}_l_{xy}&\sigma&J_3\\#4&s_4&j_z\\#7&S&J_\end{array}\right\}}
\cdot__{A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_{xy}'&\sigma'&J_3'\\#4&s_2&j_z'\\#7&S&J_\end{array}\right\}}
\cdot {A_\left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&l_y'&l_{xy}'\\#4&L&l_{yz}' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle_{A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} l_x'&\lambda&l_{xy}\\#4&L&l_{yz}'_\end{array}\right\}}
_\cdot (-)^{s_1+s_2-\sigma_x+s_2+\sigma'-S}
\cdot {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} s_2&s_1&\sigma_x\\#4&\sigma&\sigma_x' \end{array}\right\}}\\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {A \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} s_2&\sigma_x'&\sigma\\#4&S&\sigma' \end{array}\right\}}
\cdot \frac{x_y_z}{x^g_{\alpha \alpha'}_y^g_{\alpha_\alpha'}_z^g_{\alpha \alpha'}} \\
&\cdot&\displaystyle {\cal{H}}^{l_{xy}}_{l_x l_y,_l_x' \lambda}(x,y,u)
\cdot {\cal{H}}^{l_{yz}'}_{\lambda l_z,_l_y' l_z'_}(y_0,z,v)\end{aligned}$$ with the constraints $\cos(\widehat{\hat{ |
space: $$\notag
{\rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm tr}[\,\Psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$
The Ellwood invariant {#el}
---------------------
In [@Ellwood:2008jh], Ellwood conjectured that there exists a relation between the gauge-invariant observables of open string field theory which were discovered in [@HI; @GRSZ], and the closed string tadpole on a disk.[^12] In this paper, we call these gauge-invariant observables the Ellwood invariant.
The Ellwood invariant for a classical solution $\Psi$ is defined by $$\notag
\mathcal W(\Psi,\, \phi_{\text{closed}})=
\Big\langle\, \phi_{\text{closed}}(i)\ f_I\circ \Psi(0)\,\Big
\rangle_{\text{UHP}}\,.$$ Here, $\phi_{\text{closed}}$ is a closed string vertex operator of weight (1,1) and ghost number 2; $\Psi(0)$ is the operator corresponding to the classical solution $\Psi$, and $f_I\circ \Psi(0)$ is the conformal transformation of $\Psi(0)$ under the map associated with the identity state, $$\notag
f_I(\xi)\equiv\frac{2\xi}{1-\xi^2}\,.$$ Ellwood conjectured that $\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})$ is equivalent to the difference of two tadpole diagrams, $$\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})= \mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})
-\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})\,.$$ Here $\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes the closed string tadpole on a disk with the original boundary condition, and $\mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes the closed string tadpole with the boundary condition corresponding to the classical solution $\Psi$.
In [@Murata:2011ex; @Murata:2011ep], Murata and Schnabl calculated the Ellwood invariant for the Okawa-type solution . Simply applying their formula to the solution, we find that the Ellwood invariant for the solution is zero, $$\notag
\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})=-\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left(
\lim_{z\to 0}\frac{d F_\epsilon( | space: $ $ \notag
{ \rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm tr}[\,\Psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$
The Ellwood invariant { # el }
---------------------
In [ @Ellwood:2008jh ], Ellwood conjectured that there exist a relation back between the gauge - invariant observables of open drawstring field theory which were discover in [ @HI; @GRSZ ], and the shut string tadpole on a disk.[^12 ] In this paper, we call these gauge - invariant observables the Ellwood changeless.
The Ellwood invariant for a classical solution $ \Psi$ is defined by $ $ \notag
\mathcal W(\Psi,\, \phi_{\text{closed}})=
\Big\langle\, \phi_{\text{closed}}(i)\ f_I\circ \Psi(0)\,\Big
\rangle_{\text{UHP}}\,.$$ Here, $ \phi_{\text{closed}}$ is a closed string vertex hustler of weight (1,1) and ghost numeral 2; $ \Psi(0)$ is the operator corresponding to the authoritative solution $ \Psi$, and $ f_I\circ \Psi(0)$ is the conformal transformation of $ \Psi(0)$ under the map associated with the identity state, $ $ \notag
f_I(\xi)\equiv\frac{2\xi}{1-\xi^2}\,.$$ Ellwood speculate that $ \mathcal{W } (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})$ is equivalent to the difference of two tadpole diagrams, $ $ \mathcal{W } (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})= \mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed } })
-\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})\,.$$ Here $ \mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes the closed string tadpole on a phonograph record with the original boundary condition, and $ \mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes the closed string tadpole with the boundary condition correspond to the classical solution $ \Psi$.
In [ @Murata:2011ex; @Murata:2011ep ], Murata and Schnabl calculated the Ellwood invariant for the Okawa - type solution . Simply applying their formula to the solution, we find that the Ellwood invariant for the solution is zero, $ $ \notag
\mathcal{W } (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})=-\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left (
\lim_{z\to 0}\frac{d F_\epsilon ( | spwce: $$\notag
{\rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm ur}[\,\Psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$
The Ellwood iivarianf {#el}
---------------------
In [@Eulwood:2008jh], Ellwood conjectured tyat tyere exists a relation between nhe gauge-unvaciant observables of opek strjkg fizlv theory which eere discoeered in [@HI; @GRVZ], aud the closed string tadpole on a difk.[^12] In tnid paper, we calj thtse gaufv-ikvariant observables the Ellwood invarient.
The Ellwood onvariant for a classical doluhion $\Psi$ is definef by $$\notag
\mqthcwo W(\Psi,\, \phi_{\tebt{closed}})=
\Big\langle\, \phi_{\tgxt{closed}}(i)\ f_I\circ \Psi(0)\,\Big
\rangle_{\tebt{UHP}}\,.$$ Here, $\phi_{\tgrr{cllved}}$ is a clised ftring vertew operador of eeight (1,1) and ghpst nunber 2; $\Psi(0)$ is the operetor corresponding tj the clavsncal solution $\Psi$, and $f_U\circ \Psi(0)$ is gye zonrocmam trandfocmation of $\Lsi(0)$ under tye map associated wotr the identity state, $$\njtag
f_I(\xi)\equiv\frac{2\xi}{1-\xi^2}\,.$$ Ellwood conjecturtd thzt $\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{coosed}})$ is equivalent tl the difserence of two tadpole diagrams, $$\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\teft{cloadd}})= \nabhcau A_\Osi(\phi_{\text{closed}})
-\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})\,.$$ Here $\mwfhvak A_0(\phi_{\text{closcd}})$ denotes the cloxef xjring tadpole un a dnak with the original boundaty coneition, anq $\mayhcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denites the clofwd string tadpole cith the bouudary vondiyion corresponding to tke claasical soluhion $\Psi$.
Ih [@Murata:2011ex; @Murata:2011dp], Kusata and Schnabl calculateq the Ellxood nnvariang fot the Ohawa-type sllution . Simply applying hheir fmrmula to hhe solution, we find that the Ellwood invariamt fog the solbtion ls zero, $$\notag
\maehcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\tgxt{closed}})=-\jim_{\eprilon\to 0}\lert(
\lim_{z\tm 0}\frac{d F_\epfilon( | space: $$\notag {\rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm tr}[\,\Psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$ The Ellwood --------------------- [@Ellwood:2008jh], Ellwood that there exists observables open string field which were discovered [@HI; @GRSZ], and the closed string on a disk.[^12] In this paper, we call these gauge-invariant observables the Ellwood The Ellwood invariant for a classical solution $\Psi$ is defined by $$\notag \mathcal \phi_{\text{closed}})= \phi_{\text{closed}}(i)\ \Psi(0)\,\Big Here, $\phi_{\text{closed}}$ is a closed string vertex operator of weight (1,1) and ghost number 2; $\Psi(0)$ the operator corresponding to the classical solution $\Psi$, $f_I\circ \Psi(0)$ is the transformation of $\Psi(0)$ under the associated the identity $$\notag Ellwood that $\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})$ equivalent to the difference of two tadpole diagrams, $$\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})= \mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}}) -\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})\,.$$ Here $\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ the closed on a with original condition, and $\mathcal the closed string tadpole with the to the classical solution $\Psi$. In [@Murata:2011ex; @Murata:2011ep], and Schnabl the Ellwood invariant for the Okawa-type . Simply applying their formula to the solution, find that the Ellwood invariant for the solution is zero, $$\notag \mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})=-\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left( \lim_{z\to | space: $$\notag
{\rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm tr}[\,\psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$
THe EllWooD inVaRianT {#el}
---------------------
IN [@Ellwood:2008jh], EllwOOd coNjectured that there exisTs a reLaTIon bETwEen thE gauge-iNVaRIAnt ObSeRvaBlES oF open StrIng fielD theory whiCh wErE discovered iN [@hI; @gRSZ], and the CloSed string tadPolE on a diSk.[^12] in tHIs papEr, wE call These gAUge-invAriant obsErVAbles tHE EllwooD INvAriaNt.
The Ellwood invarIAnT For a classical sOlutioN $\PSI$ iS DEfiNed By $$\notag
\matHcAl W(\PsI,\, \Phi_{\text{CLoSED}})=
\big\LAngle\, \phi_{\text{cLosed}}(i)\ f_I\cirC \psi(0)\,\big
\ranGlE_{\teXT{UHP}}\,.$$ HeRe, $\phi_{\TeXT{clOsed}}$ is a closEd stRing verteX operaTOr of weiGHt (1,1) and ghOst numBer 2; $\psi(0)$ Is thE OpErAtoR cORreSPoNdiNG to The classIcAl SolutIon $\PSI$, AND $f_I\cIrc \psi(0)$ iS the cOnformal transForMatiON of $\psi(0)$ unDer thE map AsSociaTed witH the iDeNtity state, $$\notag
F_I(\xi)\Equiv\frac{2\Xi}{1-\xI^2}\,.$$ ELlwOoD conjECtured ThaT $\maThcal{W} (\PSi,\,\phi_{\teXT{clOsED}})$ IS eQuivalent to the diffErENCe Of two tadPole diAGrAmS, $$\Mathcal{W} (\psI,\,\phI_{\texT{CLosed}})= \MathCAl a_\Psi(\phi_{\tExt{cloSEd}})
-\MaThcal A_0(\pHi_{\Text{clOsEd}})\,.$$ HEre $\MathcAL A_0(\phI_{\text{cLosed}})$ denOtes tHE closed string tADpole on a disk wITh THE oRIginAl bOundary condItioN, And $\mAthcAL A_\psi(\PHi_{\texT{closEd}})$ DEnOTes the closed string tAdPole wiTh the Boundary condiTion corresPONDing to thE claSSiCAl solution $\Psi$.
IN [@MuraTa:2011ex; @Murata:2011EP], Murata aNd SchNabl calcUlated the eLLwood invAriAnt For The oKAwA-type solution . sIMply ApPlying tHeiR formulA to The SolUtiOn, We find thaT the EllwOoD iNvArIanT for tHE solutioN iS zeRo, $$\NotAg
\matHCal{W} (\PsI,\,\phi_{\tExt{cLoSeD}})=-\Lim_{\Epsilon\TO 0}\lEFT(
\lim_{Z\tO 0}\fRac{d f_\epSiLon( | space: $$\notag
{\rm tr}[ \,(Q\Psi)\ ,\phi \,] +{\ rm tr} [\,\ Psi\Psi\,\phi\ , ]=0. $$
The Ellwood invari ant { #e l }
-- - -- ----- ------- - -- -
In [ @E llw oo d :2 008jh ],Ellwood conjectur edth at there exi s ts a relatio n b etween the g aug e-inva ri ant obser vab les o f open string field th eo r y whic h were d i s co vere d in [@HI; @GRSZ] , a n d the closed s tringta d po l e on adisk.[^12] I n thi s paper, we c a llt hese gauge-in variant obs e rva bles t he El l wood i nvari an t .
The Ellwood inv ariant fo r a cl a ssicals olution $\Psi $ i s d efin e dby $$ \n o tag \m ath c alW(\Psi,\ ,\p hi_{\ text { c l o sed} })=
\Bi g\lan gle\, \phi_{\ tex t{cl o sed }}(i) \ f_I \cir c\Psi( 0)\,\B ig
\r an gle_{\text{UHP} }\,. $$ Here,$\p hi _{\ te xt{cl o sed}}$ is aclosedstringv ert ex o p er ator of weight (1, 1) a nd ghost n umber2 ;$\ P si(0)$ i sthe ope r a tor c orre s po nding to the c l as si cal sol ut ion $\ Ps i$, an d $f_ I \cir c \Psi (0)$ isthe c o nformal transf o rmation of $\ P si ( 0 )$ unde r t he map asso ciat e d wi th t h eide n titystate ,$ $\ n otag
f_I(\xi)\equiv \f rac{2\ xi}{1 -\xi^2}\,.$$Ellwood co n j e ctured t hat$ \m a thcal{W} (\Psi ,\,\p hi_{\text{ c losed}}) $ isequivale nt to the d ifferenc e o f t wotad p o le diagrams, $$ \ m athc al {W} (\P si, \,\phi_ {\t ext {cl ose d} })= \math cal A_\P si (\ ph i_ {\t ext{c l osed}})-\ mat hc alA_0(\ p hi_{\t ext{c lose d} }) \ ,.$ $ Here$ \m a t hcal A _0 (\ph i_{ \t ext{c lose d }}) $ denot es the cl ose d str in gtadpole on a disk wi th the origi na l b oundar y conditio n, and $\mathcal A_\Psi ( \phi_{\ tex t{clo sed} })$ denot esthe cl ose d strin g tadp ole w it h t h e boun d a ry co nd ition corr e s pon dingto the classi cal solution $\Psi $ .
In [@Murata:2 011 ex;@ M ur ata : 20 1 1ep ], Mur a t a and Schnabl c alculatedth e E llwood inv a ria nt for th e Okawa -type solutio n . Simpl y applyin gthei r for mula to th e soluti on, we fi n d tha t t he El lwo od inv ar ian t for the s o lut ion i s zero ,$$\not ag
\m at hcal{W}(\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{clo sed}}) =-\li m_{ \epsilon\ to0 }\l eft(
\lim _{z\ to 0}\frac {dF_\ epsil on( | space:_$$\notag
{\rm tr}[\,(Q\Psi)\,\phi\,]+{\rm_tr}[\,\Psi\Psi\,\phi\,]=0.$$
The Ellwood invariant {#el}
---------------------
In_[@Ellwood:2008jh], Ellwood_conjectured_that there_exists_a relation between_the gauge-invariant observables_of open string field_theory which were_discovered_in [@HI; @GRSZ], and the closed string tadpole on a disk.[^12] In this paper,_we_call these_gauge-invariant_observables_the Ellwood invariant.
The Ellwood invariant_for a classical solution $\Psi$_is defined_by $$\notag
\mathcal W(\Psi,\, \phi_{\text{closed}})=
\Big\langle\, \phi_{\text{closed}}(i)\ f_I\circ \Psi(0)\,\Big
\rangle_{\text{UHP}}\,.$$ Here,_$\phi_{\text{closed}}$_is a closed_string vertex operator of weight (1,1) and ghost number_2; $\Psi(0)$ is the operator corresponding_to the classical_solution_$\Psi$,_and $f_I\circ \Psi(0)$ is_the conformal transformation of $\Psi(0)$ under_the map associated with the identity_state, $$\notag
f_I(\xi)\equiv\frac{2\xi}{1-\xi^2}\,.$$ Ellwood conjectured that $\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})$_is equivalent to the difference of_two tadpole diagrams, $$\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})=_\mathcal A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})
-\mathcal_A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})\,.$$ Here $\mathcal A_0(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes_the closed string_tadpole on_a disk with_the original boundary condition, and $\mathcal_A_\Psi(\phi_{\text{closed}})$ denotes the_closed string tadpole with the boundary_condition_corresponding to the_classical_solution_$\Psi$.
In [@Murata:2011ex;_@Murata:2011ep], Murata and_Schnabl_calculated the_Ellwood_invariant for the Okawa-type solution . Simply_applying_their formula to the solution, we find_that the Ellwood invariant_for_the solution is zero,_$$\notag
\mathcal{W} (\Psi,\,\phi_{\text{closed}})=-\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left(
\lim_{z\to 0}\frac{d F_\epsilon( |
and for all objects $X_{1},\dots,X_{n},Y\in \underline{\mathcal{O}}$, the map of spaces $$\mul_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{ X_{1},\dots,X_{n}\right\} ;Y\right)\to\mul_{h_{d}\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{ \theta_{d}\left(X_{1}\right),\dots,\theta_{d}\left(X_{n}\right)\right\} ;\theta_{d}\left(Y\right)\right)$$ is the $\left(d-1\right)$-truncation map.
Follows from, (the universal property of $\theta_{d}$) and analogously to the proof for $d$-categories.
We conclude with a simple consequence of the theory of $d$-operads, that showcases the effectiveness of the strict model.
\[prop:Alg\_d\_Category\] Let $\mathcal{O}$ be an $\infty$-operad and let $\mathcal{U}$ be an (essentially) $d$-operad. The $\infty$-category $\underline{\alg}_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is an (essentially) $d$-category.
Since an $\infty$-operad $\mathcal{U}$ is an essentially $d$-operad if and only if it is equivalent to a (strict) $d$-operad, it is enough to prove the strict version. By definition, the $\infty$-category $\alg_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is a full subcategory of $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$. For $d\ge1$, the $\infty$-category $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ is a $d$-category and, therefore, by T.2.3.4.8, the $\infty$-category $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$ is a $d$-category as well. Hence, every full subcategory of it is a $d$-category. For $d=0$, by we can assume that $\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ is a $0$-operad as well and therefore both $\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ and $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ are skeletal 1-categories with faithful projection to $\finpt$. Observing that $\alg | and for all objects $ X_{1},\dots, X_{n},Y\in \underline{\mathcal{O}}$, the map of spaces $ $ \mul_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\ { X_{1},\dots, X_{n}\right\ }; Y\right)\to\mul_{h_{d}\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\ { \theta_{d}\left(X_{1}\right),\dots,\theta_{d}\left(X_{n}\right)\right\ }; \theta_{d}\left(Y\right)\right)$$ is the $ \left(d-1\right)$-truncation map.
follow from, (the cosmopolitan property of $ \theta_{d}$) and analogously to the proof for $ d$-categories.
We reason with a simple consequence of the hypothesis of $ d$-operads, that showcases the effectiveness of the strict mannequin.
\[prop: Alg\_d\_Category\ ] get $ \mathcal{O}$ be an $ \infty$-operad and let $ \mathcal{U}$ be an (essentially) $ d$-operad. The $ \infty$-category $ \underline{\alg}_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is an (essentially) $ d$-category.
Since an $ \infty$-operad $ \mathcal{U}$ is an essentially $ d$-operad if and entirely if it is equivalent to a (strict) $ d$-operad, it is enough to test the rigid version. By definition, the $ \infty$-category $ \alg_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is a wide subcategory of $ \fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$. For $ d\ge1 $, the $ \infty$-category $ \mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ is a $ d$-category and, therefore, by T.2.3.4.8, the $ \infty$-category $ \fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$ is a $ d$-category as well. therefore, every full subcategory of it is a $ d$-category. For $ d=0 $, by we can assume that $ \mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ is a $ 0$-operad as well and consequently both $ \mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ and $ \mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ are skeletal 1 - categories with faithful projection to $ \finpt$. Observing that $ \alg | anf for all objects $X_{1},\dots,X_{k},Y\in \underline{\majhxal{O}}$, tie map kf spacer $$\mul_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{ X_{1},\dots,X_{i}\rigyt\} ;Y\rught)\to\mul_{h_{d}\mathcal{O}}\lefg(\left\{ \thena_{d}\left(X_{1}\rught),\vots,\theta_{d}\left(X_{n}\cjght)\rigmc\} ;\thefw_{d}\leyt(B\right)\right)$$ is jhe $\left(d-1\rigvt)$-truncation mdp.
Woplows from, (the universal property os $\theta_{c}$) wnd analogousli to uhe prokf for $d$-categories.
We conclude with a simpne consequencr of the theory of $d$-operadd, thwt showcases the evfectivenesw of rhe strict mudel.
\[prop:Alg\_d\_Category\] Lgt $\mathcal{O}$ be an $\infty$-operad ana let $\mathcal{U}$ ve an (gssentially) $v$-operaq. The $\infty$-category $\gnderlime{\alg}_{\mathcal{O}}\lcft(\mavhcao{U}\right)$ is an (essentielly) $d$-category.
Since wn $\infty$-o[exad $\mathcal{U}$ is an eswebtialny $d$-mperxe iw ahd ohly if it is equivament to a (srrict) $d$-operad, it is egiugh to prove the seryct version. By definition, the $\infty$-catecorg $\alg_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcao{U}\right)$ is a full subfategory jf $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$. For $d\ce1$, thx $\knfuy$-gwgwglry $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ is a $d$-category and, therefows, ny T.2.3.4.8, the $\infty$-cabegory $\fun\left(\mathvap{O}^{\pjimes},\mathcal{U}^{\ojimes}\riygt)$ is a $d$-category as well. Hgnce, ecery full subvategory of it is a $d$-categoey. For $d=0$, by ce xan assume that $\machcal{O}^{\otimes}$ is s $0$-opetad as well and therefoxe botg $\mathcal{O}^{\ohimes}$ and $\oathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ afe xkaletal 1-categories with faiehful prooectipn to $\fknpt$. Obserding that $\wlg | and for all objects $X_{1},\dots,X_{n},Y\in \underline{\mathcal{O}}$, the spaces X_{1},\dots,X_{n}\right\} ;Y\right)\to\mul_{h_{d}\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{ ;\theta_{d}\left(Y\right)\right)$$ is the universal of $\theta_{d}$) and to the proof $d$-categories. We conclude with a simple of the theory of $d$-operads, that showcases the effectiveness of the strict model. Let $\mathcal{O}$ be an $\infty$-operad and let $\mathcal{U}$ be an (essentially) $d$-operad. The $\underline{\alg}_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ an $d$-category. an $\infty$-operad $\mathcal{U}$ is an essentially $d$-operad if and only if it is equivalent to a $d$-operad, it is enough to prove the strict By definition, the $\infty$-category is a full subcategory of For the $\infty$-category is $d$-category therefore, by T.2.3.4.8, $\infty$-category $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$ is a $d$-category as well. Hence, every full subcategory of it is a $d$-category. For by we that $\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ a as and therefore both $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ are skeletal 1-categories with faithful Observing that $\alg | and for all objects $X_{1},\dots,X_{n},Y\iN \underline{\MathcAl{O}}$, The MaP of sPaceS $$\mul_{\mathcal{O}}\leFT(\lefT\{ X_{1},\dots,X_{n}\right\} ;Y\right)\to\mUl_{h_{d}\mAtHCal{O}}\LEfT(\left\{ \Theta_{d}\lEFt(x_{1}\RIghT),\dOtS,\thEtA_{D}\lEft(X_{n}\RigHt)\right\} ;\Theta_{d}\left(y\riGhT)\right)$$ is the $\lEFt(D-1\right)$-trunCatIon map.
FollowS frOm, (the uNiVerSAl proPerTy of $\tHeta_{d}$) aND analoGously to tHe PRoof foR $D$-categoRIEs.
we coNclude with a simple COnSEquence of the thEory of $D$-oPErADS, thAt sHowcases thE eFfectIVeness oF ThE STRicT Model.
\[prop:Alg\_d\_category\] Let $\MAthCal{O}$ be An $\InfTY$-operaD and lEt $\MAthCal{U}$ be an (essEntiAlly) $d$-operAd. The $\iNFty$-cateGOry $\undeRline{\aLg}_{\mAthCal{O}}\LEfT(\mAthCaL{u}\riGHt)$ Is aN (EssEntially) $D$-cAtEgory.
sincE AN $\INfty$-OpeRad $\mAthcaL{U}$ is an essentiAllY $d$-opERad If and Only iF it iS eQuivaLent to A (striCt) $D$-operad, it is enouGh to Prove the sTriCt VerSiOn. By dEFinitiOn, tHe $\iNfty$-catEgory $\alG_{\MatHcAL{o}}\LeFt(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is a FuLL SuBcategorY of $\fun\LEfT(\mAThcal{O}^{\otImEs},\mAthcAL{u}^{\otimEs}\riGHt)$. for $d\ge1$, thE $\infty$-CAtEgOry $\mathCaL{U}^{\otimEs}$ Is a $D$-caTegorY And, tHerefoRe, by T.2.3.4.8, the $\Infty$-CAtegory $\fun\left(\MAthcal{O}^{\otimes},\MAtHCAl{u}^{\OtimEs}\rIght)$ is a $d$-catEgorY As weLl. HeNCe, EveRY full SubcaTeGOrY Of it is a $d$-category. For $D=0$, bY we can AssumE that $\mathcal{O}^{\Otimes}$ is a $0$-oPERAd as well And tHErEFore both $\mathcaL{O}^{\otiMes}$ and $\mathCAl{U}^{\otimeS}$ are sKeletal 1-cAtegories WITh faithfUl pRojEctIon TO $\FiNpt$. Observing tHAT $\alg | and for all objects $X_{1 },\dots,X_ {n},Y \in \u nd erli ne{\ mathcal{O}}$,t he m ap of spaces $$\mul_{\ mathc al { O}}\ l ef t(\le ft\{ X_ { 1} , \ dot s, X_ {n} \r i gh t\} ; Y\r ight)\t o\mul_{h_{ d}\ ma thcal{O}}\le f t( \left\{ \t het a_{d}\left(X _{1 }\righ t) ,\d o ts,\t het a_{d} \left( X _{n}\r ight)\rig ht \ } ;\th e ta_{d}\ l e ft (Y\r ight)\right)$$ is th e $\left(d-1\ri ght)$- tr u nc a t ion ma p.
Follow sfrom, (the un i ve r s a l p r operty of $\t heta_{d}$)a ndanalog ou sly to the proo ff or$d$-categor ies.
We conc lude w i th a si m ple con sequen ceofthet he or y o f$ d$- o pe rad s , t hat show ca se s the eff e c t i vene ssof t he st rict model.
\[p rop: A lg\ _d\_C atego ry\] L et $\ mathca l{O}$ b e an $\infty$-o pera d and let $\ ma thc al {U}$b e an ( ess ent ially)$d$-ope r ad. T h e $\ infty$-category $\ un d e rl ine{\alg }_{\ma t hc al { O}}\left (\ mat hcal { U }\rig ht)$ is an (ess ential l y) $ d$-cate go ry.
S in cean$\inf t y$-o perad$\mathca l{U}$ is an essentia l ly $d$-operad if a nd only if it is equi vale n t to a ( s tr ict ) $d$- opera d, it is enough to proveth e stri ct ve rsion. By def inition, t h e $\infty$ -cat e go r y $\alg_{\math cal{O }}\left(\m a thcal{U} \righ t)$ is a full sub c a tegory o f $ \fu n\l eft ( \ ma thcal{O}^{\ot i m es}, \m athcal{ U}^ {\otime s}\ rig ht) $.Fo r $d\ge1$ , the $\ in ft y$ -c ate gory$ \mathcal {U }^{ \o tim es}$i s a $d $-cat egor yan d , t herefor e ,b y T.2 .3 .4 .8,the $ \inft y$-c a teg ory $\f un\left(\ mat h cal{ O} ^{ \otimes },\mathcal{U} ^{ \otimes}\r ig ht) $ is a $ d$-categ ory as well. Hence, eve r y fullsub categ oryof it isa $ d$-cat ego r y. For $d=0$ , bywe ca n assum e th at$\ mathcal{O} ^ { \ot imes} $is a $0$-op erad as well and t h ere fore both $\m ath cal{ O } ^{ \ot i me s }$an d $\ m a thcal{U}^{\otim es}$ are s ke l et al 1-categ o rie swith fa ithfulproje c tion to $\finpt$ . Observi ng tha t $\a lg | and_for all_objects $X_{1},\dots,X_{n},Y\in \underline{\mathcal{O}}$, the_map of_spaces_$$\mul_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{ X_{1},\dots,X_{n}\right\}_;Y\right)\to\mul_{h_{d}\mathcal{O}}\left(\left\{_\theta_{d}\left(X_{1}\right),\dots,\theta_{d}\left(X_{n}\right)\right\} ;\theta_{d}\left(Y\right)\right)$$ is_the $\left(d-1\right)$-truncation map.
Follows_from, (the universal property_of $\theta_{d}$) and_analogously_to the proof for $d$-categories.
We conclude with a simple consequence of the theory of_$d$-operads,_that showcases_the_effectiveness_of the strict model.
\[prop:Alg\_d\_Category\] Let_$\mathcal{O}$ be an $\infty$-operad and_let $\mathcal{U}$_be an (essentially) $d$-operad. The $\infty$-category $\underline{\alg}_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$ is_an_(essentially) $d$-category.
Since an_$\infty$-operad $\mathcal{U}$ is an essentially $d$-operad if and only_if it is equivalent to a_(strict) $d$-operad, it_is_enough_to prove the strict_version. By definition, the $\infty$-category $\alg_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathcal{U}\right)$_is a full subcategory of $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$._For $d\ge1$, the $\infty$-category $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$ is a_$d$-category and, therefore, by T.2.3.4.8, the_$\infty$-category $\fun\left(\mathcal{O}^{\otimes},\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\right)$ is a $d$-category_as well._Hence, every full subcategory of_it is a_$d$-category. For_$d=0$, by we_can assume that $\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ is a_$0$-operad as well_and therefore both $\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}$ and $\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}$_are_skeletal 1-categories with_faithful_projection_to $\finpt$._Observing that $\alg |
Then $N_1$ is a line bundle of degree $-l$, say. One clearly has $l\leq d_1$. Define the stratification of $S_{k-2}$ given by the subsets $$T_t=\{ (L_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2} \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\otimes}L_2)=t\}.$$ Clearly $\dim T_t \leq \dim G(1,d_2+l,t)$. Also we stratify $G(1,d_1,2)$ by the subsets $W_l$ of those coherent systems $(L_1,V_1)$ such that the image of the map ${{{\mathcal O}}}^2\to L_1$ is a line bundle of degree $l$. Generically this map is surjective, so $W_{d_1}$ is an open dense subset.
We start by considering the stratum $W_{d_1}\subset G(1,d_1,2)$. An easy calculation using that $d_1>d_2\geq \frac{k-3}{k-2}g +k-3$ (see ) and $k\geq 5$ shows that $$\dim G(1,d,d-g+4)< \dim G(1,d_2,k-2).$$ Therefore the generic number of sections of the line bundle $N^*_1{\otimes}L_2$, for $(L_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2}$ and $(L_1,V_1) \in W_{d_1}$, is $p\leq d-g+3$. Note that in particular $d-g+3 \geq 0$. At a point of $T_t\subset S_{k-2}$ with $t\leq d-g+3$ we have $$\dim {{\mathbb H}}^2_{12}=\dim H^0(L_2^*{\otimes}N_1{\otimes}K)=g-1-d+t \leq 2<
C_{21}.$$ At a point of $T_{d-g+4+t}$ with $t\geq 0$ we have, $$\begin{aligned}
\dim {{\mathbb H}}^2_{12} &- & {\operatorname{codim}}T_{d-g+4+t}=g-1- | Then $ N_1 $ is a line bundle of degree $ -l$, say. One intelligibly have $ l\leq d_1$. Define the stratification of $ S_{k-2}$ given by the subsets $ $ T_t=\ { (L_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2 } \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\otimes}L_2)=t\}.$$ distinctly $ \dim T_t \leq \dim G(1,d_2+l, t)$. Also we stratify $ G(1,d_1,2)$ by the subsets $ W_l$ of those coherent arrangement $ (L_1,V_1)$ such that the image of the map $ { { { \mathcal O}}}^2\to L_1 $ is a channel bundle of degree $ l$. Generically this function is surjective, so $ W_{d_1}$ is an open dense subset.
We start by considering the class $ W_{d_1}\subset G(1,d_1,2)$. An easy calculation using that $ d_1 > d_2\geq \frac{k-3}{k-2}g + k-3 $ (see) and $ k\geq 5 $ shows that $ $ \dim G(1,d, d - g+4) < \dim G(1,d_2,k-2).$$ Therefore the generic act of sections of the line bundle $ N^*_1{\otimes}L_2 $, for $ (L_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2}$ and $ (L_1,V_1) \in W_{d_1}$, is $ p\leq d - g+3$. eminence that in particular $ d - g+3 \geq 0$. At a point of $ T_t\subset S_{k-2}$ with $ t\leq d - g+3 $ we experience $ $ \dim { { \mathbb H}}^2_{12}=\dim H^0(L_2^*{\otimes}N_1{\otimes}K)=g-1 - d+t \leq 2 <
C_{21}.$$ At a point of $ T_{d - g+4+t}$ with $ t\geq 0 $ we have, $ $ \begin{aligned }
\dim { { \mathbb H}}^2_{12 } & - & { \operatorname{codim}}T_{d - g+4+t}=g-1- | Thfn $N_1$ is a line bundle of degree $-l$, say. Ouw cleacly has $l\leq d_1$. Aefine the stratification of $S_{j-2}$ givtu by the subsets $$T_t=\{ (U_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2} \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\otimws}L_2)=t\}.$$ Xlearly $\dim T_t \leq \dim G(1,s_2+p,t)$. Anwo we stratify $G(1,d_1,2)$ by the subsets $W_l$ of tfode coherent systems $(L_1,V_1)$ such that thq image ov the map ${{{\mathsal P}}}^2\eo L_1$ ps a line bundle of degree $l$. Gehericalny this map ix surjective, so $W_{d_1}$ is an ooen fense subset.
We stagt by consieerigt the stratuo $W_{d_1}\subset G(1,d_1,2)$. An easy dalculation using that $d_1>d_2\geq \frxc{k-3}{k-2}g +k-3$ (see ) ane $j\gee 5$ shows thav $$\dim D(1,d,d-g+4)< \dim G(1,d_2,k-2).$$ Therefose the beneric number of sextions of the line buidle $N^*_1{\otimes}L_2$, for $(L_2,V_2) \in S_{k-2}$ ang $(M_1,V_1) \in W_{d_1}$, is $p\leq e-g+3$. Note thad in pargichler $s-g+3 \geq 0$. Av a point or $T_t\subset W_{k-2}$ with $t\leq d-g+3$ we nadv $$\dim {{\mathbb G}}^2_{12}=\dim H^0(J_2^*{\oeimes}N_1{\otimes}K)=g-1-d+t \leq 2<
C_{21}.$$ At a point of $T_{d-f+4+t}$ with $t\geq 0$ we have, $$\bwgin{aligned}
\dim {{\mathhb H}}^2_{12} &- & {\opqratorname{codim}}T_{d-g+4+t}=g-1- | Then $N_1$ is a line bundle of say. clearly has d_1$. Define the the $$T_t=\{ (L_2,V_2) \in \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\otimes}L_2)=t\}.$$ $\dim T_t \leq \dim G(1,d_2+l,t)$. Also stratify $G(1,d_1,2)$ by the subsets $W_l$ of those coherent systems $(L_1,V_1)$ such that image of the map ${{{\mathcal O}}}^2\to L_1$ is a line bundle of degree Generically map surjective, $W_{d_1}$ is an open dense subset. We start by considering the stratum $W_{d_1}\subset G(1,d_1,2)$. An easy using that $d_1>d_2\geq \frac{k-3}{k-2}g +k-3$ (see ) and 5$ shows that $$\dim \dim G(1,d_2,k-2).$$ Therefore the generic of of the bundle for \in S_{k-2}$ and \in W_{d_1}$, is $p\leq d-g+3$. Note that in particular $d-g+3 \geq 0$. At a point of $T_t\subset with $t\leq have $$\dim H}}^2_{12}=\dim \leq C_{21}.$$ At a $T_{d-g+4+t}$ with $t\geq 0$ we have, H}}^2_{12} &- & {\operatorname{codim}}T_{d-g+4+t}=g-1- | Then $N_1$ is a line bundle of degreE $-l$, say. One clEarly Has $L\leQ d_1$. defiNe thE stratificatioN Of $S_{k-2}$ Given by the subsets $$T_t=\{ (L_2,V_2) \iN S_{k-2} \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\OtIMes}L_2)=T\}.$$ clEarly $\Dim T_t \leQ \DiM g(1,D_2+l,t)$. alSo We sTrATiFy $G(1,d_1,2)$ bY thE subsetS $W_l$ of those CohErEnt systems $(L_1,V_1)$ SUcH that the imAge Of the map ${{{\mathCal o}}}^2\to L_1$ is A lIne BUndle Of dEgree $L$. GenerICally tHis map is sUrJEctive, SO $W_{d_1}$ is an OPEn DensE subset.
We start by cONsIDering the stratUm $W_{d_1}\suBsET G(1,D_1,2)$. aN eaSy cAlculation UsIng thAT $d_1>d_2\geq \fRAc{K-3}{K-2}G +K-3$ (seE ) And $k\geq 5$ shows tHat $$\dim G(1,d,d-g+4)< \dIM G(1,d_2,K-2).$$ ThereFoRe tHE generIc numBeR Of sEctions of thE linE bundle $N^*_1{\oTimes}L_2$, FOr $(L_2,V_2) \in S_{K-2}$ And $(L_1,V_1) \in w_{d_1}$, is $p\lEq d-G+3$. NoTe thAT iN pArtIcULar $D-G+3 \gEq 0$. AT A poInt of $T_t\sUbSeT S_{k-2}$ wiTh $t\lEQ D-G+3$ We haVe $$\dIm {{\maThbb H}}^2_{12}=\Dim H^0(L_2^*{\otimes}N_1{\oTimEs}K)=g-1-D+T \leQ 2<
C_{21}.$$ At a Point Of $T_{d-G+4+t}$ With $t\Geq 0$ we hAve, $$\beGiN{aligned}
\dim {{\mathBb H}}^2_{12} &- & {\oPeratornaMe{cOdIm}}T_{D-g+4+T}=g-1- | Then $N_1$ is a line bund le of degr ee $- l$, sa y. One cle arly has $l\le q d_1 $. Define the stratifi catio no f $S _ {k -2}$given b y t h e su bs et s $ $T _ t= \{ (L _2, V_2) \i n S_{k-2}\;|\ ; h^0(N^*_1{ \ ot imes}L_2)= t\} .$$ Clearly$\d im T_t \ leq \dimG(1 ,d_2+ l,t)$. Also w e stratif y$ G(1,d_ 1 ,2)$ by t he sub sets $W_l$ of tho s ec oherent system s $(L_ 1, V _1 ) $ su chthat the i ma ge of the map ${ { { \ mat h cal O}}}^2\to L_1$ is al ine bundl eofd egree$l$.Ge n eri cally thismapis surjec tive,s o $W_{d _ 1}$ isan ope n d ens e su b se t.
W es tar t b y c o nsi dering t he s tratu m $W _ { d _ 1}\s ubs et G (1,d_ 1,2)$. An eas y c alcu l ati on us ing t hat$d _1>d_ 2\geq\frac {k -3}{k-2}g +k-3$ (se e ) and $ k\g eq 5$ s howst hat $$ \di m G (1,d,d- g+4)< \ d imG( 1 , d _2 ,k-2).$$ Therefore t h e g eneric n umbero fse c tions of t heline b undle $N^ * _1 {\otimes }L_2$, fo r$(L_2,V _2 ) \inS_ {k- 2}$ and$ (L_1 ,V_1)\in W_{d _1}$, is $p\leq d-g+ 3 $. Note thati np a rt i cula r $ d-g+3 \geq0$.A t apoin t o f $ T _t\su bsetS_ { k- 2 }$ with $t\leq d-g+ 3$ we ha ve $$ \dim {{\mathb b H}}^2_{1 2 } = \dim H^0 (L_2 ^ *{ \ otimes}N_1{\ot imes} K)=g-1-d+t \leq 2< C_ {21}.$$At a poin t of $T_{d -g+ 4+t }$wit h $t \geq 0$ we ha v e , $$ \b egin{al ign ed}
\ dim {{ \ma thb bH}}^2_{12 } &- & { \o pe ra to rna me{co d im}}T_{d -g +4+ t} =g- 1- | Then_$N_1$ is_a line bundle of_degree $-l$,_say._One clearly_has_$l\leq d_1$. Define_the stratification of_$S_{k-2}$ given by the_subsets $$T_t=\{ (L_2,V_2)_\in_S_{k-2} \; |\; h^0(N^*_1{\otimes}L_2)=t\}.$$ Clearly $\dim T_t \leq \dim G(1,d_2+l,t)$. Also we stratify $G(1,d_1,2)$_by_the subsets_$W_l$_of_those coherent systems $(L_1,V_1)$ such_that the image of the_map ${{{\mathcal_O}}}^2\to L_1$ is a line bundle of degree_$l$._Generically this map_is surjective, so $W_{d_1}$ is an open dense subset.
We_start by considering the stratum $W_{d_1}\subset_G(1,d_1,2)$. An easy_calculation_using_that $d_1>d_2\geq \frac{k-3}{k-2}g +k-3$_(see ) and $k\geq 5$ shows_that $$\dim G(1,d,d-g+4)< \dim G(1,d_2,k-2).$$ Therefore_the generic number of sections of the_line bundle $N^*_1{\otimes}L_2$, for $(L_2,V_2) \in_S_{k-2}$ and $(L_1,V_1) \in W_{d_1}$,_is $p\leq_d-g+3$. Note that in particular_$d-g+3 \geq 0$._At a_point of $T_t\subset_S_{k-2}$ with $t\leq d-g+3$ we have_$$\dim {{\mathbb H}}^2_{12}=\dim_H^0(L_2^*{\otimes}N_1{\otimes}K)=g-1-d+t \leq 2<
C_{21}.$$_At_a point of_$T_{d-g+4+t}$_with_$t\geq 0$_we have, $$\begin{aligned}
__\dim {{\mathbb_H}}^2_{12}_&- & {\operatorname{codim}}T_{d-g+4+t}=g-1- |
(\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'})
\sin(\varphi_{\gamma})(\Delta \epsilon)_{\alpha'} (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}.\end{aligned}$$ The bin center values $\epsilon_{\alpha'}$ and $\vartheta_{\beta'}$ are given just as $r_{i'}$ and $\theta_{j'}$ in (\[rcenter\]) and (\[thetacenter\]). Also, the momentum bin widths are given by the difference of the bounding edge values, just as in the case of the spatial zones. The definitions of $(1/r)_{i'}$ and $(\cot\theta)_{j'}$ will be given below. The values of ${\cal N}$ on momentum bin edges are given by “upwind” or “donor-cell” differencing (see [@liebendoerfer02]).
Finally, we show the remaining definitions needed to ensure that the second and fourth terms in (\[example\]), as well as the third and fifth terms, cancel for ${\cal N}$ spatially homogeneous. Given the differencings defined above, this is accomplished with the following definitions: $$\begin{aligned}
(\sin\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}), \\
(\cos\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& {\sin(\vartheta_{\beta+1})^2 - \sin(\vartheta_{\beta})^2
\over 2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}) (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}}, \\
(\cos\varphi)_{\gamma'} &=& {\sin(\varphi_{\gamma+1}) - \sin(\varphi_{\gamma})
\over (\Delta\varphi)_{\gamma'}}, \\
\left(1\over r\right)_{i'} &=& {(r_{i+1})^2 - (r_i)^2 \over 2 (r_{i'})^2 (\Delta r)_{i'}}, \\
(\cot\theta)_{j'} &=& {\sin(\theta_{j+1}) - \sin(\theta_{j})
\over \sin(\theta_{j'}) (\Delta\theta)_{j'}}.\end{aligned}$$
Radiative transfer algorithm and distributed-memory implementation {#sec:5}
==================================================================
In this section classes of operators involved in radiation transport are identified, and a strategy for implementing them on distributed-memory computer architectures is described.
The equations of neutrino radiative transfer are the transport equation for whatever radiation particle distribution function is used, together | (\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta' })
\sin(\varphi_{\gamma})(\Delta \epsilon)_{\alpha' } (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}.\end{aligned}$$ The bin center values $ \epsilon_{\alpha'}$ and $ \vartheta_{\beta'}$ are given just as $ r_{i'}$ and $ \theta_{j'}$ in (\[rcenter\ ]) and (\[thetacenter\ ]). besides, the momentum bank identification number width are given by the difference of the bounding edge value, just as in the case of the spatial zone. The definition of $ (1 / r)_{i'}$ and $ (\cot\theta)_{j'}$ will be given downstairs. The values of $ { \cal N}$ on momentum bin edge are given by “ upwind ” or “ donor - cell ” differencing (visualize [ @liebendoerfer02 ]).
Finally, we show the remaining definitions needed to ensure that the second and fourth terminus in (\[example\ ]), as well as the third and fifth terms, cancel for $ { \cal N}$ spatially homogeneous. give the differencings defined above, this is accomplished with the following definitions: $ $ \begin{aligned }
(\sin\vartheta)_{\beta' } & = & \sin(\vartheta_{\beta' }), \\
(\cos\vartheta)_{\beta' } & = & { \sin(\vartheta_{\beta+1})^2 - \sin(\vartheta_{\beta})^2
\over 2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta' }) (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta' } }, \\
(\cos\varphi)_{\gamma' } & = & { \sin(\varphi_{\gamma+1 }) - \sin(\varphi_{\gamma })
\over (\Delta\varphi)_{\gamma' } }, \\
\left(1\over r\right)_{i' } & = & { (r_{i+1})^2 - (r_i)^2 \over 2 (r_{i'})^2 (\Delta r)_{i' } }, \\
(\cot\theta)_{j' } & = & { \sin(\theta_{j+1 }) - \sin(\theta_{j })
\over \sin(\theta_{j' }) (\Delta\theta)_{j'}}.\end{aligned}$$
Radiative transportation algorithm and distributed - memory execution { # sec:5 }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In this section classes of operators involved in radiotherapy transport are identified, and a strategy for implementing them on distributed - memory calculator architecture is described.
The equations of neutrino radiative transfer are the transport equation for whatever radiation particle distribution function is used, in concert | (\epdilon_{\alpha'})^2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beua'})
\sin(\varphi_{\gamma})(\Bwlta \e'silon)_{\ampha'} (\Deuta\vartheta)_{\beta'}.\end{aligned}$$ Thx bib cenuvr values $\epsilon_{\alphx'}$ and $\varnheta_{\beta'}$ are tiven just as $r_{i'}$ akb $\thefw_{j'}$ iu (\[ccenter\]) and (\[thejacenter\]). Alsm, the momentum bkn widths are given by the difference of the blunding edge vwluex, jusf as in the case of the spatial zohes. The definitions pf $(1/r)_{i'}$ and $(\cot\theta)_{j'}$ will bf gigen below. The valufs of ${\cal N}$ on iimentum bin ddges are given by “upwjnd” or “donor-cell” differencing (sde [@lizbendoerfer02]).
Dibalpi, we show thx remapning definitlpns neaded to ensure that tme serond and fourth terms in (\[xxample\]), as well as tre third dnb fifth terms, cancel doe ${\cal N}$ s[atixoly hojojensous. Glvei the diffedencings dedined above, this is asbpmplished wifh the fjllowing definitions: $$\begin{aligned}
(\sin\varuheta)_{\geta'} &=& \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}), \\
(\cis\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& {\sin(\vwrtheta_{\beea+1})^2 - \sin(\vartheta_{\beta})^2
\over 2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}) (\Delta\vardheta)_{\uega'}}, \\
(\eis\varoyi)_{\hamma'} &=& {\sin(\varphi_{\gamma+1}) - \sin(\varphi_{\gamma})
\over (\Dejfa\fagphi)_{\gamma'}}, \\
\left(1\ovev r\right)_{i'} &=& {(r_{i+1})^2 - (r_i)^2 \pvfr 2 (r_{i'})^2 (\Delta r)_{i'}}, \\
(\zot\thecz)_{j'} &=& {\sin(\theta_{j+1}) - \sin(\thfta_{j})
\ovet \sin(\tyeta_{j'}) (\Delua\theya)_{j'}}.\end{aligned}$$
Radiative tranwfer algoritkm qnd distributed-memlry implemeutatiom {#sec:5}
==================================================================
On this section classes of kperators ijvolved ih radiation transoorn ara identified, and a strategr for impoemeuting thdm om distwibuted-memlry computer architecturfs is dascribed.
Thf equations of neutrino radiatitx transfer arg tve nransport equabion for whatevqr radiation pcrticle bistricution funbtion is nsed, togethew | (\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}) \sin(\varphi_{\gamma})(\Delta \epsilon)_{\alpha'} (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}.\end{aligned}$$ The bin $\epsilon_{\alpha'}$ $\vartheta_{\beta'}$ are just as $r_{i'}$ (\[thetacenter\]). the momentum bin are given by difference of the bounding edge values, as in the case of the spatial zones. The definitions of $(1/r)_{i'}$ and will be given below. The values of ${\cal N}$ on momentum bin edges given “upwind” “donor-cell” (see [@liebendoerfer02]). Finally, we show the remaining definitions needed to ensure that the second and fourth in (\[example\]), as well as the third and terms, cancel for ${\cal spatially homogeneous. Given the differencings above, is accomplished the definitions: (\sin\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}), (\cos\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& {\sin(\vartheta_{\beta+1})^2 - \sin(\vartheta_{\beta})^2 \over 2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}) (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}}, \\ (\cos\varphi)_{\gamma'} &=& {\sin(\varphi_{\gamma+1}) - \sin(\varphi_{\gamma}) \over (\Delta\varphi)_{\gamma'}}, \left(1\over r\right)_{i'} - (r_i)^2 2 (\Delta \\ (\cot\theta)_{j'} &=& \sin(\theta_{j}) \over \sin(\theta_{j'}) (\Delta\theta)_{j'}}.\end{aligned}$$ Radiative transfer implementation {#sec:5} ================================================================== In this section classes of involved in transport are identified, and a strategy implementing them on distributed-memory computer architectures is described. equations of neutrino radiative transfer are the transport equation for whatever radiation particle distribution function together | (\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beTa'})
\sin(\varphI_{\gammA})(\DeLta \EpSiloN)_{\alpHa'} (\Delta\varthetA)_{\Beta'}.\End{aligned}$$ The bin center ValueS $\ePSiloN_{\AlPha'}$ anD $\vartheTA_{\bETA'}$ arE gIvEn jUsT As $R_{i'}$ and $\TheTa_{j'}$ in (\[rcEnter\]) and (\[thEtaCeNter\]). Also, the mOMeNtum bin widThs Are given by thE diFferenCe Of tHE bounDinG edge Values, JUst as iN the case oF tHE spatiAL zones. THE DeFiniTions of $(1/r)_{i'}$ and $(\cot\thETa)_{J'}$ Will be given belOw. The vAlUEs OF ${\Cal n}$ on Momentum biN eDges aRE given bY “UpWIND” or “DOnor-cell” diffeRencing (see [@lIEbeNdoerfEr02]).
finALly, we sHow thE rEMaiNing definitIons Needed to eNsure tHAt the seCOnd and fOurth tErmS in (\[ExamPLe\]), As WelL aS The THiRd aND fiFth terms, CaNcEl for ${\Cal N}$ SPATIallY hoMogeNeous. given the diffeRenCingS DefIned aBove, tHis iS aCcompLished With tHe Following definiTionS: $$\begin{aliGneD}
(\sIn\vArTheta)_{\BEta'} &=& \sin(\VarTheTa_{\beta'}), \\
(\cOs\varthETa)_{\bEtA'} &=& {\SIN(\vArtheta_{\beta+1})^2 - \sin(\vartHeTA_{\BeTa})^2
\over 2 \siN(\varthETa_{\BeTA'}) (\Delta\vaRtHetA)_{\betA'}}, \\
(\COs\varPhi)_{\gAMmA'} &=& {\sin(\varpHi_{\gammA+1}) - \SiN(\vArphi_{\gaMmA})
\over (\DElTa\vArpHi)_{\gamMA'}}, \\
\lefT(1\over r\Right)_{i'} &=& {(r_{i+1})^2 - (R_i)^2 \oveR 2 (R_{i'})^2 (\Delta r)_{i'}}, \\
(\cot\thETa)_{j'} &=& {\sin(\theta_{j+1}) - \sIN(\tHETa_{J})
\Over \Sin(\Theta_{j'}) (\Delta\ThetA)_{J'}}.\end{AligNEd}$$
radIAtive TransFeR AlGOrithm and distributeD-mEmory iMplemEntation {#sec:5}
==================================================================
In This sectioN CLAsses of oPeraTOrS Involved in radiAtion Transport aRE identifIed, anD a strateGy for implEMEnting thEm oN diStrIbuTED-mEmory computer ARChitEcTures is DesCribed.
THe eQuaTioNs oF nEutrino raDiative tRaNsFeR aRe tHe traNSport equAtIon FoR whAteveR RadiatIon paRticLe DiSTriBution fUNcTIOn is UsEd, TogeTheR | (\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2 \s in(\varthe ta_{\ bet a'} )
\si n(\v arphi_{\gamma} ) (\De lta \epsilon)_{\alpha' } (\ De l ta\v a rt heta) _{\beta ' }. \ e nd{ al ig ned }$ $ T he bi n c enter v alues $\ep sil on _{\alpha'}$a nd $\varthet a_{ \beta'}$ are gi ven ju st as $r_{i '}$ and$\thet a _{j'}$ in (\[rc en t er\])a nd (\[t h e ta cent er\]). Also, them om e ntum bin width s aregi v en b y t hedifference o f the boundin g e d g e va l ues, just asin the case ofthe sp at ial zones. Thede f ini tions of $( 1/r) _{i'}$ an d $(\c o t\theta ) _{j'}$will b e g ive n be l ow .The v a lue s o f $ { \ca l N}$ on m om entum bin e d g es a regive n by“upwind” or “ don or-c e ll” diff erenc ing(s ee [@ lieben doerf er 02]).
Finally, weshow therem ai nin gdefin i tionsnee ded to ens ure tha t th es e c on d and fourth terms i n (\ [example \]), a s w el l as theth ird and f ifthterm s ,cancel f or ${\ c al N }$ spat ia lly ho mo gen eou s. Gi v en t he dif ferencin gs de f ined above, th i s is accompli s he d wi t h th e f ollowing de fini t ions : $$ \ be gin { align ed}
( \s i n\ v artheta)_{\beta'} & =& \sin( \vart heta_{\beta'} ), \\
(\co s \ v artheta) _{\b e ta ' } &=& {\sin(\ varth eta_{\beta + 1})^2 -\sin( \varthet a_{\beta} ) ^ 2
\over2 \ sin (\v art h e ta _{\beta'}) (\ D e lta\ va rtheta) _{\ beta'}} , \ \
( \co s\v ar phi)_{\ga mma'} &= & { \s in (\v arphi _ {\gamma+ 1} ) - \ sin (\var p hi_{\g amma} )
\o ve r( \De lta\var p hi ) _ {\ga mm a' }},\\\l eft(1 \ove r r\ right)_ {i'} &=&{(r _ {i+1 }) ^2 - (r_i )^2 \over 2 ( r_ {i'})^2 (\ De lta r)_{i ' } }, \\
(\ cot\theta)_{j'} &=& {\s i n(\thet a_{ j+1}) - \ sin(\thet a_{ j})
\o ver \sin(\ theta_ {j'}) ( \De l t a\the t a )_ {j' }} .\end{alig n e d}$ $
Ra di ativ e trans fer algorithm andd ist ributed-memor y i mple m e nt ati o n{ #se c: 5 }
= = = =============== ========== == = == ========== = === == ======= ======= ===
I n thissection c lasses of o pera t o rsinvolved i n radiat ion trans p ort a r eident ifi ed, an da s trate gy for imp lemen ting t he m on d istri bu ted-memo ry computer architectur es isdescr ibe d.
The e qua t ion s of neut rino radiative tr ans fer a ret he tr ansp o rt eq u ation for whateverr ad iat i o nparticle di s t r ibu tionfun c tion i s us ed, together | (\epsilon_{\alpha'})^2_\sin(\vartheta_{\beta'})
\sin(\varphi_{\gamma})(\Delta_\epsilon)_{\alpha'} (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}.\end{aligned}$$ The_bin center_values_$\epsilon_{\alpha'}$ and_$\vartheta_{\beta'}$_are given just_as $r_{i'}$ and_$\theta_{j'}$ in (\[rcenter\]) and_(\[thetacenter\]). Also, the_momentum_bin widths are given by the difference of the bounding edge values, just as_in_the case_of_the_spatial zones. The definitions of_$(1/r)_{i'}$ and $(\cot\theta)_{j'}$ will be_given below._The values of ${\cal N}$ on momentum bin_edges_are given by_“upwind” or “donor-cell” differencing (see [@liebendoerfer02]).
Finally, we show the_remaining definitions needed to ensure that_the second and_fourth_terms_in (\[example\]), as well_as the third and fifth terms,_cancel for ${\cal N}$ spatially homogeneous._Given the differencings defined above, this is_accomplished with the following definitions: $$\begin{aligned}
(\sin\vartheta)_{\beta'}_&=& \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}), \\
(\cos\vartheta)_{\beta'} &=& _{\sin(\vartheta_{\beta+1})^2 -_\sin(\vartheta_{\beta})^2
\over 2 \sin(\vartheta_{\beta'}) (\Delta\vartheta)_{\beta'}}, \\
(\cos\varphi)_{\gamma'}_&=& {\sin(\varphi_{\gamma+1})_- \sin(\varphi_{\gamma})
\over_(\Delta\varphi)_{\gamma'}}, \\
\left(1\over r\right)_{i'}_&=& {(r_{i+1})^2 - (r_i)^2 \over 2_(r_{i'})^2 (\Delta r)_{i'}},_\\
(\cot\theta)_{j'} &=& {\sin(\theta_{j+1}) - \sin(\theta_{j})
\over \sin(\theta_{j'})_(\Delta\theta)_{j'}}.\end{aligned}$$
Radiative_transfer algorithm and_distributed-memory_implementation_{#sec:5}
==================================================================
In this_section classes of_operators_involved in_radiation_transport are identified, and a strategy_for_implementing them on distributed-memory computer architectures is_described.
The equations of neutrino_radiative_transfer are the transport_equation for whatever radiation particle_distribution function is used, together |
H_{V} = g \nu$. Then conclusion (i) of Theorem \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] holds. Furthermore, if for all odd $j$, the hypersurfaces $M_j$ as in conclusion (ii) of Theorem \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] are two-sided, then there is an $n$-manifold $S_{V}$ and a proper $C^2$ immersion $\iota:S_V \to N$ such that $V=\iota_\#(|S_V|),$ and there is a continuous choice of unit normal $\nu$ on $S_V$ such that the mean curvature $H_{V}(x)$ of $S_V$ at $x$ is given by $H_{V}(x) = g (\iota(x)) \nu(x)$.
The two-sidedness of $M_j$ for $j$ odd is true for the varifolds obtained in [@RogTon].
Remarks on the regularity theorems
----------------------------------
\[oss:smallportions\] A key common feature of the variational assumptions in Theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm:mainregstationarityimmersedparts\], \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] is the fact that they are required *only on orientable portions of the regular set*; here regular means $C^1$ for stationarity and and $C^2$ for stability, i.e. respectively the regularity conditions that allow to state stationarity and stability for immersions in a classical way. A priori these portions could be very small in measure, since we assume no size control on the genuine singular set ${\text{spt}\,\|V\|} \setminus {\text{gen-reg}\,}{V}$. The only global assumption on $V$ is the $L^p_{\text{loc}}$-condition on the first variation, which, by Allard’s compactness theorem, can be verified in many situations of interest. We also stress that the only control required on the singular set by assumption involves just two specific types of singularities that can be described by means of *regular pieces that come together in a regular fashion*: this is mild hypothesis that favours checkability in the potential applications of the theory.
\[oss:globalconclusion\] The regularity theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm: | H_{V } = g \nu$. Then conclusion (i) of Theorem \[thm: mainreg\_g0\_version1\ ] holds. Furthermore, if for all curious $ j$, the hypersurfaces $ M_j$ as in ending (ii) of Theorem \[thm: mainreg\_g0\_version1\ ] are two - sided, then there is an $ n$-manifold $ S_{V}$ and a proper $ C^2 $ immersion $ \iota: S_V \to N$ such that $ V=\iota_\#(|S_V|),$ and there be a continuous choice of unit normal $ \nu$ on $ S_V$ such that the mean curvature $ H_{V}(x)$ of $ S_V$ at $ x$ is give by $ H_{V}(x) = g (\iota(x) ) \nu(x)$.
The two - sidedness of $ M_j$ for $ j$ odd is true for the varifolds obtain in [ @RogTon ].
Remarks on the regularity theorems
----------------------------------
\[oss: smallportions\ ] A key coarse feature of the variational assumptions in theorem \[thm: mainreg\_gpos\ ], \[thm: mainregstationarityimmersedparts\ ], \[thm: mainreg\_g0\_version1\ ] is the fact that they are command * only on orientable portions of the regular set *; here regular mean $ C^1 $ for stationarity and and $ C^2 $ for stability, i.e. respectively the regularity conditions that allow to express stationarity and stability for immersions in a classical way. A priori these part could be very small in measure, since we assume no size control on the genuine singular dress $ { \text{spt}\,\|V\| } \setminus { \text{gen - reg}\,}{V}$. The only global assumption on $ V$ is the $ L^p_{\text{loc}}$-condition on the first variation, which, by Allard ’s compactness theorem, can be verified in many situations of interest. We also stress that the only control required on the singular set by assumption involves merely two specific types of singularities that can be identify by mean of * even pieces that come together in a regular fashion *: this is mild hypothesis that prefer checkability in the potential applications of the theory.
\[oss: globalconclusion\ ] The regularity theorems \[thm: mainreg\_gpos\ ], \[thm: | H_{V} = g \nu$. Then conclusion (i) uf Theorem \[thm:manbreg\_g0\_vxrsion1\] golds. Fufthermore, if for all odd $j$, tie htpersyrfaces $M_j$ as in concljsion (ii) lf Theorwm \[thn:nainreg\_g0\_vecaion1\] arc two-alded, chxn there is an $k$-manifold $S_{E}$ and a proper $C^2$ ilmersion $\iota:S_V \to N$ such that $V=\iotw_\#(|S_V|),$ and tjere is a contynuols chojbe of unit normal $\nu$ on $S_V$ such that tie mean curvatute $H_{V}(x)$ of $S_V$ at $x$ is given by $J_{V}(x) = g (\iota(x)) \nu(x)$.
Hhe two-sideenesf of $M_j$ for $j$ odd is trlz for the vzrifolds obtained in [@RogTon].
Remafks ou the regulqruty jheorems
----------------------------------
\[oss:snallpjrtions\] A ken commot featute of the varistimnao assumptions in Theocems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[jhm:mainregvtctionarityimmersedparrs\], \[thm:mdinrag\_g0\_vdesiun1\] js tge fach tiat they ars required *inly on orientable koreppns of the rsgular sqt*; here regular means $C^1$ for stationaritj ans and $C^2$ for stability, i.w. respectively the regolarity cogditions that allow to state stationarity and statilitb wor iiowrdions in a classical way. A priori these portijhs cpuld be very siall in meaxuge, fince we assuoe no sizs control on the gfnuine finguoar set ${\ttxt{spy}\,\|V\|} \setminus {\text{gen-reg}\,}{V}$. The only global qssumption on $V$ is the $L^p_{\text{uoc}}$-cpnditoon on the first variatnon, whjch, by Allagd’s compadgness theorem, cav bv vesified in many situations jf interewt. Wz also sgresx that the only fontrol required on the dingupas set by adsumption involves just two spermfic types of shngllarities that can be descrybed by means pf *regujar pkeces that come tmgether in w regular fasvlon*: this is kild hypjthewis rhat faxuurs checkabiloty in thv kotential qpplications of thc theudy.
\[oss:globalconcousuon\] The regularoty thqogemx \[evm:mainreg\_gpov\], \[tho: | H_{V} = g \nu$. Then conclusion (i) \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] Furthermore, if all odd $j$, conclusion of Theorem \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] two-sided, then there an $n$-manifold $S_{V}$ and a proper immersion $\iota:S_V \to N$ such that $V=\iota_\#(|S_V|),$ and there is a continuous choice unit normal $\nu$ on $S_V$ such that the mean curvature $H_{V}(x)$ of $S_V$ $x$ given $H_{V}(x) g (\iota(x)) \nu(x)$. The two-sidedness of $M_j$ for $j$ odd is true for the varifolds obtained [@RogTon]. Remarks on the regularity theorems ---------------------------------- \[oss:smallportions\] key common feature of variational assumptions in Theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] the fact they required on orientable portions the regular set*; here regular means $C^1$ for stationarity and and $C^2$ for stability, i.e. respectively the conditions that state stationarity stability immersions a classical way. these portions could be very small we assume no size control on the genuine set ${\text{spt}\,\|V\|} {\text{gen-reg}\,}{V}$. The only global assumption on is the $L^p_{\text{loc}}$-condition on the first variation, which, Allard’s compactness theorem, can be verified in many situations of interest. We also stress that control required on the set by assumption just specific of that can described by means of *regular pieces that come together in a fashion*: this is mild hypothesis that favours checkability in the of theory. \[oss:globalconclusion\] The theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm: | H_{V} = g \nu$. Then conclusion (i) of TheOrem \[thm:maiNreg\_g0\_VerSioN1\] hOlds. furtHermore, if for alL Odd $j$, The hypersurfaces $M_j$ as in ConclUsIOn (ii) OF THeoreM \[thm:maiNReG\_G0\_VerSiOn1\] Are TwO-SiDed, thEn tHere is aN $n$-manifold $s_{V}$ aNd A proper $C^2$ immeRSiOn $\iota:S_V \to n$ suCh that $V=\iota_\#(|S_v|),$ anD there Is A coNTinuoUs cHoice Of unit NOrmal $\nU$ on $S_V$ such ThAT the meAN curvatURE $H_{v}(x)$ of $s_V$ at $x$ is given by $H_{V}(x) = G (\IoTA(x)) \nu(x)$.
The two-sidEdness Of $m_J$ fOR $J$ odD is True for the VaRifolDS obtainED iN [@rOGToN].
remarks on the rEgularity thEOreMs
----------------------------------
\[oss:sMaLlpORtions\] a key cOmMOn fEature of the VariAtional asSumptiONs in TheORems \[thm:MainreG\_gpOs\], \[tHm:maINrEgStaTiONarITyImmERseDparts\], \[thM:mAiNreg\_g0\_VersION1\] IS the FacT thaT they Are required *onLy oN oriENtaBle poRtionS of tHe RegulAr set*; hEre reGuLar means $C^1$ for staTionArity and aNd $C^2$ FoR stAbIlity, I.E. respeCtiVelY the regUlarity COndItIONS tHat allow to state staTiONArIty and stAbilitY FoR iMMersions In A clAssiCAL way. A PrioRI tHese portIons coULd Be Very smaLl In measUrE, siNce We assUMe no Size coNtrol on tHe genUIne singular set ${\TExt{spt}\,\|V\|} \setminUS {\tEXT{gEN-reg}\,}{v}$. ThE only global AssuMPtioN on $V$ IS tHe $L^P_{\Text{lOc}}$-conDiTIoN On the first variation, WhIch, by ALlard’S compactness tHeorem, can bE VERified in Many SItUAtions of intereSt. We aLso stress tHAt the onlY contRol requiRed on the sINGular set By aSsuMptIon INVoLves just two spECIfic TyPes of siNguLaritieS thAt cAn bE deScRibed by meAns of *regUlAr PiEcEs tHat coME togetheR iN a rEgUlaR fashIOn*: this Is milD hypOtHeSIs tHat favoURs CHEckaBiLiTy in The PoTentiAl apPLicAtions oF the theorY.
\[osS:GlobAlCoNclusioN\] The regularitY tHeorems \[thm:MaInrEg\_gpos\], \[THM: | H_{V} = g \nu$. Then concl usion (i)of Th eor em\[ thm: main reg\_g0\_versi o n1\] holds. Furthermore, i f for a l l od d $ j$, t he hype r su r f ace s$M _j$ a s i n con clu sion (i i) of Theo rem \ [thm:mainreg \ _g 0\_version 1\] are two-sid ed, thenth ere is an $n $-man ifold$ S_{V}$ and a pr op e r $C^2 $ immers i o n$\io ta:S_V \to N$ suc h t h at $V=\iota_\# (|S_V| ), $ a n d th ere is a cont in uousc hoice o f u n i t no r mal $\nu$ on$S_V$ sucht hat the m ea n c u rvatur e $H_ {V } (x) $ of $S_V$at $ x$ is giv en by$ H_{V}(x ) = g ( \iota( x)) \ nu(x ) $.
The t w o-s i de dne s s o f $M_j$fo r$j$ o dd i s t r ue f orthevarif olds obtained in [@R o gTo n].
Remar ks o nthe r egular ity t he orems
--------- ---- --------- --- -- --- -- --
\ [ oss:sm all por tions\] A keyc omm on f e at ure of the variati on a l a ssumptio ns inT he or e ms \[thm :m ain reg\ _ g pos\] , \[ t hm :mainreg statio n ar it yimmers ed parts\ ], \[ thm :main r eg\_ g0\_ve rsion1\] is t h e fact that th e y are require d * o n ly on o rie ntable port ions of t he r e gu lar set*; here r e gu l ar means $C^1$ forst ationa rityand and $C^2$ for stabi l i t y, i.e.resp e ct i vely the regul arity condition s that al low t o statestationar i t y and st abi lit y f ori m me rsions in a c l a ssic al way. A pr iori th ese po rti ons c ould be v ery smal lin m ea sur e, si n ce we as su meno si ze co n trol o n the gen ui ne sin gular s e t$ { \tex t{ sp t}\, \|V \| } \se tmin u s { \text{g en-reg}\, }{V } $. T he o nly glo bal assumptio non $V$ isth e $ L^p_{\ t e xt{loc}} $-condition on the firs t variat ion , whi ch,by Allard ’scompac tne s s theo rem, c an be v eri f i ed in m an y s it uations of i nte rest. W e al so stre ss that the only c o ntr ol required o n t he s i n gu lar se t by a s sum p t ion involves ju st two spe ci f ic types ofs ing ul arities that c an be describ ed by mea ns of *re gu larp i ece s that com e togeth er in a r e gular fa shion *:this i smil d hyp othesi s th at fa voursch eckabi lityin the pot ential applications ofthe th eory.
\ [oss:glob alc o ncl usion\] T he r egularitythe ore ms \[ thm : mainr eg\_ g po s\] , \[th m: | H_{V} =_g \nu$._Then conclusion (i) of_Theorem \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] holds._Furthermore,_if for_all_odd $j$, the_hypersurfaces $M_j$ as_in conclusion (ii) of_Theorem \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\] are two-sided,_then_there is an $n$-manifold $S_{V}$ and a proper $C^2$ immersion $\iota:S_V \to N$ such_that_$V=\iota_\#(|S_V|),$ and_there_is_a continuous choice of unit_normal $\nu$ on $S_V$ such_that the_mean curvature $H_{V}(x)$ of $S_V$ at $x$ is_given_by $H_{V}(x) =_ g (\iota(x)) \nu(x)$.
The two-sidedness of $M_j$ for_$j$ odd is true for the_varifolds obtained in_[@RogTon].
Remarks_on_the regularity theorems
----------------------------------
\[oss:smallportions\] A_key common feature of the variational_assumptions in Theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm:mainregstationarityimmersedparts\], \[thm:mainreg\_g0\_version1\]_is the fact that they are required_*only on orientable portions of the_regular set*; here regular means_$C^1$ for_stationarity and and $C^2$ for_stability, i.e. respectively the_regularity conditions_that allow to_state stationarity and stability for immersions_in a classical_way. A priori these portions could_be_very small in_measure,_since_we assume_no size control_on_the genuine_singular_set ${\text{spt}\,\|V\|} \setminus {\text{gen-reg}\,}{V}$. The only_global_assumption on $V$ is the $L^p_{\text{loc}}$-condition on_the first variation, which,_by_Allard’s compactness theorem, can_be verified in many situations_of interest. We also stress that_the only_control required_on the singular set by assumption involves just two specific types_of singularities that can be described_by means of *regular_pieces that_come_together in a_regular_fashion*: this_is mild hypothesis that favours checkability in_the potential_applications of the theory.
\[oss:globalconclusion\] The regularity_theorems \[thm:mainreg\_gpos\], \[thm: |
,, 126, 2291
Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (Sausalito, CA: Univ. Sci.)
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 2002,, 124, 266.
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 2010,, 139, 2097.
Robinson, A., et al. 1994,, 291, 351
Rupke, D. S., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D. B. 2005,, 160, 87
Sanders, D. B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011,, 737, 103
Scoville, N., et al. 2015,, 800, 70
Schweizer, F. 1998, in Galaxies: Interaction and Induced Star Formation, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 26, ed. D. Friedli, L.Martinet, & D. Pfenniger (New York: Springer), 105
Sharp, R. G. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2010,, 711, 818
Shull, J. M., & McKee, C. F. 1979,, 227, 122
Smith, D. A. & Wilson, A. S. 2001,, 557, 180
Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (New York: Wiley-Interscience)
Strickland, D. K. & Stevens, I. R. 2000,, 314, 511
Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Kimberly, A. W., & Dahlem, M. 2000,, 120, 2965
Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, J. M., Hoopes, C. G., | ,, 126, 2291
Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (Sausalito, CA: Univ. Sci .)
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 2002, , 124, 266.
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 2010, , 139, 2097.
Robinson, A., et al. 1994, , 291, 351
Rupke, D. S., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D. B. 2005, , 160, 87
Sanders, D. B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, , 737, 103
Scoville, N., et al. 2015, , 800, 70
Schweizer, F. 1998, in Galaxies: Interaction and Induced Star Formation, Saas - Fee Advanced Course 26, ed. D. Friedli, L.Martinet, & D. Pfenniger (New York: Springer), 105
Sharp, R. G. & Bland - Hawthorn, J. 2010, , 711, 818
Shull, J. M., & McKee, C. F. 1979, , 227, 122
Smith, D. A. & Wilson, A. S. 2001, , 557, 180
Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (New York: Wiley - Interscience)
Strickland, D. K. & Stevens, I. R. 2000, , 314, 511
Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Kimberly, A. W., & Dahlem, M. 2000, , 120, 2965
Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, J. M., Hoopes, C. G., | ,, 126, 2291
Odterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of Gasxous Negulae ana Active Galactic Nuclei (Saudaoito, XA: Univ. Sci.)
Peng, C. Y., Ho, U. C., Impey, B. D., & Rix, H. -Q. 2002,, 124, 266.
Keng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impxg, C. D., & Rlr, H. -W. 2010,, 139, 2097.
Robnnwon, A., et al. 1994,, 291, 351
Ropke, D. S., Veinleux, S., & Sandess, D. B. 2005,, 160, 87
Sanders, D. B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749
Fchlaflu, F. F. & Finkbeinet, D. P. 2011,, 737, 103
Scobploe, N., et al. 2015,, 800, 70
Schweizer, F. 1998, in Gamaxies: Pnteraction and Imduced Star Formation, Saas-Vee Wdvanced Course 26, ef. D. Friedli, L.Mawrinet, & D. Pfevniger (New York: Springgr), 105
Sharp, R. G. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2010,, 711, 818
Sfull, L. M., & McKee, X. D. 1979,, 227, 122
Dkith, D. A. & Wmlson, W. S. 2001,, 557, 180
Spitzer, L. 1978, Physiwal Provesses in the Lntervteolar Medium (New York: Xiley-Interscience)
Stryckland, D. K. & Stevens, I. R. 2000,, 314, 511
Steixklang, D. N., Hezjmav, T. M., Kjmberlj, A. W., & Dahlem, M. 2000,, 120, 2965
Stricklqnd, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Cjobert, J. M., Hooles, C. D., | ,, 126, 2291 Osterbrock, D. E. & J. Astrophysics of Nebulae and Active Sci.) C. Y., Ho, C., Impey, C. & Rix, H. -W. 2002,, 124, Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 139, 2097. Robinson, A., et al. 1994,, 291, 351 Rupke, D. S., Veilleux, & D. 2005,, 87 Sanders, D. B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749 Schlafly, E. F. & D. P. 2011,, 737, 103 Scoville, N., et 2015,, 800, 70 Schweizer, 1998, in Galaxies: Interaction and Star Saas-Fee Advanced 26, D. L.Martinet, & D. (New York: Springer), 105 Sharp, R. G. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2010,, 711, 818 Shull, J. M., & C. F. 122 Smith, A. Wilson, S. 2001,, 557, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the York: Wiley-Interscience) Strickland, D. K. & Stevens, I. 2000,, 314, Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., A. W., & Dahlem, M. 2000,, 120, 2965 D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, J. M., Hoopes, C. G., | ,, 126, 2291
Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, AstrOphysics of gaseoUs NEbuLaE and actiVe Galactic NuclEI (SauSalito, CA: Univ. Sci.)
Peng, C. Y., HO, L. C., ImPeY, c. D., & RiX, h. -W. 2002,, 124, 266.
peng, C. y., Ho, L. C., ImPEy, c. d., & rix, h. -W. 2010,, 139, 2097.
roBinSoN, a., eT al. 1994,, 291, 351
RuPke, d. S., VeillEux, S., & SanderS, D. B. 2005,, 160, 87
saNders, D. B. & MirabEL, I. f. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749
SchlaFly, e. F. & Finkbeiner, d. P. 2011,, 737, 103
SCovillE, N., Et aL. 2015,, 800, 70
schweIzeR, F. 1998, in GAlaxieS: interaCtion and INdUCed StaR formatiON, saAs-FeE Advanced Course 26, ed. d. frIEdli, L.Martinet, & D. pfenniGeR (neW yOrk: sprInger), 105
Sharp, r. G. & bland-hAwthorn, j. 2010,, 711, 818
shULL, j. M., & MCkee, C. F. 1979,, 227, 122
Smith, D. A. & WIlson, A. S. 2001,, 557, 180
SpitZEr, L. 1978, physicAl proCEsses iN the INtERstEllar Medium (new YOrk: Wiley-INterscIEnce)
StrICkland, D. k. & SteveNs, I. r. 2000,, 314, 511
StRickLAnD, D. k., HeCkMAn, T. m., kiMbeRLy, A. w., & Dahlem, M. 2000,, 120, 2965
stRiCklanD, D. K., HECKMAn, T. M., colBert, j. M., HooPes, C. G., | ,, 126, 2291
Osterbrock,D. E. & Fe rland , G . J .2006 , As trophysics ofG aseo us Nebulae and ActiveGalac ti c Nuc l ei (Sau salito, CA : Uni v. S ci. )Pe ng, C . Y ., Ho,L. C., Imp ey, C . D., & Rix, H. -W. 2002, , 1 24, 266.
Pe ng, C. Y. ,Ho, L. C. , I mpey, C. D. , & Rix , H. -W.20 1 0,, 13 9 , 2097. Ro bins on, A., et al. 19 9 4, , 291, 351
Rup ke, D. S . ,V e ill eux , S., & Sa nd ers,D . B. 20 0 5, , 1 60, 87
Sanders,D. B. & Mir a bel , I. F .199 6 , ARA& A, 34 ,7 49
Schlafly,E. F . & Finkb einer, D. P. 2 0 11,, 73 7, 103
S cov ille , N ., et a l . 2 0 15 ,,8 00, 70
Sch we iz er, F . 19 9 8 , in G ala xies : Int eraction andInd uced Sta r For matio n, S aa s-Fee Advan ced C ou rse 26, ed. D.Frie dli, L.Ma rti ne t,&D. Pf e nniger (N ewYork: S pringer ) , 1 05 S ha rp, R. G. & Bland- Ha w t ho rn, J. 2 010,,7 11 ,8 18
Shul l, J. M., & McKe e, C . F . 1979,, 227,1 22
Smith,D. A. &Wi lso n,A. S. 2001 ,, 557 , 180
S pitze r , L. 1978, Phy s ical Processe s i n th e Int ers tellar Medi um ( N ew Y ork: Wi ley - Inter scien ce )
S trickland, D. K. &St evens, I. R . 2000,, 314, 511
Stri c k l and, D.K.,H ec k man, T. M., Ki mberl y, A. W.,& Dahlem, M. 2 000,, 12 0, 2965
S t rickland , D . K .,Hec k m an , T. M., Colb e r t, J .M., Hoo pes , C. G. , | ,, 126,_2291
Osterbrock, D._E. & Ferland, G._J. 2006, Astrophysics_of_Gaseous Nebulae_and_Active Galactic Nuclei_(Sausalito, CA: Univ._Sci.)
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C.,_Impey, C. D., &_Rix,_H. -W. 2002,, 124, 266.
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H. -W. 2010,, 139,_2097.
Robinson,_A., et_al. 1994,,_291,_351
Rupke, D. S., Veilleux, S.,_& Sanders, D. B. 2005,, 160,_87
Sanders, D._B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749
Schlafly,_E._F. & Finkbeiner,_D. P. 2011,, 737, 103
Scoville, N., et al. 2015,, 800, 70
Schweizer,_F. 1998, in Galaxies: Interaction and Induced_Star Formation, Saas-Fee_Advanced_Course_26, ed. D. Friedli,_L.Martinet, & D. Pfenniger (New York:_Springer), 105
Sharp, R. G. & Bland-Hawthorn,_J. 2010,, 711, 818
Shull, J. M., & McKee,_C. F. 1979,, 227, 122
Smith, D. A._& Wilson, A. S. 2001,, 557,_180
Spitzer, L. 1978,_Physical Processes in the Interstellar_Medium (New York:_Wiley-Interscience)
Strickland, D._K. & Stevens,_I. R. 2000,, 314, 511
Strickland, D. K.,_Heckman, T. M.,_Kimberly, A. W., & Dahlem, M. 2000,,_120,_2965
Strickland, D. K.,_Heckman,_T._M., Colbert,_J. M., Hoopes,_C._G., |
different energy, and non degenerate. Notice that one of them corresponds to a center of mass excitation and that merges with other levels at $E=9$ when $g\rightarrow \infty$. Using these type of arguments one can assign the spin to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian even if the total wave function could be complicated and most of the times non-factorizable in a spin and a space part.
Dynamical excitation {#chap5}
====================
In Sects. \[chap3\] and \[chap4\] we have concentrated on the static properties of the fermionic system. In particular, we have analyzed the ground state and also the main features of the low-energy spectrum. In the present section we turn our attention to the dynamics of the fermionic system in the harmonic trap. Simulating the dynamics of quantum many-body systems is important for current quantum technological applications where one could for instance design quantum systems to produce desired many-body states after a certain evolution [@global_optimi.; @quench.bos.; @breath.bos.]. A second relevant aspect is that the dynamics of the system reflects in many ways its internal structure. In this sense, one can devise a dynamical evolution in order to unveil the spectral structure of the system [@exciting_breathing_mode]. This is the main goal of this section. To this aim we consider two different perturbations to the ground state of the system, which are sensitive to the low-energy spectra presented before. The first is a sudden change in the trap frequency. This perturbation excites both center-of-mass and relative modes of the system and can be analyzed by computing the dynamic structure function. In the second one, we numerically obtain the time evolution of the system after a sudden quench of the interaction strength. In this case, the center-of-mass modes are not excited and we look for traces of the internal structure on the time evolution of the central density of the cloud.
Sudden change in the trap frequency: breathing mode {#sec5.1}
---------------------------------------------------
A well-known way to study the internal structure of a quantum many-body system trapped in a harmonic oscillator is by exciting the so called breathing mode. In contrast with the Kohn (dipole) mode, where the cloud is initially displaced from the minimum of the harmonic potential [@kohn.mode], in our case we study the response of the system to a change in the trapping frequency. The main tool | different energy, and non degenerate. Notice that one of them correspond to a plaza of mass excitation and that merges with early levels at $ E=9 $ when $ g\rightarrow \infty$. Using these type of argument one can assign the spin to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian even if the entire wave function could be complicated and most of the times non - factorizable in a tailspin and a space part.
Dynamical excitation { # chap5 }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In Sects. \[chap3\ ] and \[chap4\ ] we have boil down on the static properties of the fermionic system. In particular, we have analyzed the land state and also the main feature of the low - energy spectrum. In the present section we turn our care to the dynamics of the fermionic organization in the harmonic trap. Simulating the moral force of quantum many - body systems is important for current quantum technological applications where one could for instance invention quantum systems to produce desired many - body states after a certain evolution [ @global_optimi. ; @quench.bos. ; @breath.bos. ]. A second relevant aspect is that the dynamics of the system reflect in many ways its internal social organization. In this common sense, one can devise a dynamical evolution in order to uncover the spectral social organization of the system [ @exciting_breathing_mode ]. This is the main goal of this incision. To this aim we consider two different perturbations to the ground state of the system, which are sensitive to the low - energy spectra portray earlier. The first is a sudden change in the trap frequency. This perturbation excites both plaza - of - mass and relative modes of the arrangement and can be analyzed by computing the dynamic structure routine. In the second one, we numerically obtain the fourth dimension evolution of the system after a sudden quench of the interaction military capability. In this case, the center field - of - mass mode are not excited and we attend for traces of the internal social organization on the time evolution of the central density of the cloud.
Sudden change in the trap frequency: breathing mode { # sec5.1 }
---------------------------------------------------
A well - known way to study the internal social organization of a quantum many - body system trap in a harmonic oscillator is by exciting the so called breathing mode. In contrast with the Kohn (dipole) mode, where the cloud is initially move from the minimum of the harmonic potential [ @kohn.mode ], in our case we study the response of the system to a variety in the trapping frequency. The main instrument | divferent energy, and non dtgenerate. Notice jhqt one of thsm correrponds to a center of mass eecitqtion and that merges with uther levvls at $E=9$ qhen $t\rightarrox \infty$. Mfing bhese vype of argumenjs one can avsign the spin tu che eigenstates of the Hamiltonian eden if yhf total wave fonctipg cohld be complicated and most of the times ion-factorizable in a spin and a space parh.
Dynwmical excitation {#fhap5}
====================
In Sectw. \[cha[3\] and \[chap4\] we fave concentrated on tge static properties of the feroionie system. In pqrtlwular, we hate anajyzed the ground stade and slso the main neatuces if the low-energy specvrum. In the present fection wa curn our attention to tye dytamiws ow thd ftrmmonjc syshem in the hadmonic trap. Simulating the dynsmybx of quantum many-bjdr systems is important for current quanuum tschnological applicatiobs where one could fot instance design quantum systems to produce desired many-bogy stetds cnber x cfrtain evolution [@global_optimi.; @quench.bos.; @breath.fks.]. A second relevakt aspect is that yhf cinamics of the system rsflects in many wajs its ynterbal strucuure. On this sense, one can devisw a dynamicaj evolution in ordex to unveil che spgctral structure of the systeo [@excjting_breathlng_mode]. Tgks is the main gual ox this stztion. To this aim we consiver tco diffefent pertuwbations tl the ground state of thf sysjem, whhch are sejsitive to the low-energy spectre presented bgfose. Nhe first is a sudden changq in the trap yrequencv. This perturbatpon excitxs both centqr-of-mass and sglative modes of the fystwm abd can cd analyzed by vomputing the dynamuc structure functlon. Iv the second one, we numerically obyaiv tre tmme edmlution of tve shstdk aftdr a sudden duenvh of the interactiot stdength. In this casr, bhe centet-of-mass mjdes are not rxcited and we loon for treces og tre internal structure on the tjme evoluhiok of the centwal eensity of tke cloud.
Sudden change in the trap frequeicy: breathing mode {#sec5.1}
---------------------------------------------------
A well-known way to sjudn the internel strtcture of a quantum many-body wystem trapped in a harmonic oscillatod is bf exclting the so called breathing mode. In contrast with the Kohn (dipole) mode, qhere vhq cloud is jnitoally dnspkaced srom vhe minimum of thv harmonic potential [@kohn.mode], in uur case wz study the response of the susgem to a chanee in the trapping frequsncy. The main tool | different energy, and non degenerate. Notice that them to a of mass excitation levels $E=9$ when $g\rightarrow Using these type arguments one can assign the spin the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian even if the total wave function could be and most of the times non-factorizable in a spin and a space part. excitation ==================== Sects. and \[chap4\] we have concentrated on the static properties of the fermionic system. In particular, we analyzed the ground state and also the main of the low-energy spectrum. the present section we turn attention the dynamics the system the harmonic trap. the dynamics of quantum many-body systems is important for current quantum technological applications where one could for design quantum produce desired states a evolution [@global_optimi.; @quench.bos.; second relevant aspect is that the system reflects in many ways its internal structure. this sense, can devise a dynamical evolution in to unveil the spectral structure of the system This is the main goal of this section. To this aim we consider two different the ground state of system, which are to low-energy presented The first a sudden change in the trap frequency. This perturbation excites both and relative modes of the system and can be analyzed the structure function. In second one, we numerically the evolution of the system sudden of In case, center-of-mass modes are not and we look for traces the internal structure on central density of the cloud. Sudden change in trap frequency: breathing mode {#sec5.1} --------------------------------------------------- A way to study the internal structure of a quantum many-body system trapped a harmonic by exciting the so called breathing mode. In with the Kohn (dipole) where the cloud is initially displaced from the minimum the potential [@kohn.mode], our case we the response of system to a the trapping The tool | different energy, and non degeNerate. NotiCe thaT onE of ThEm coRresPonds to a center OF masS excitation and that mergEs witH oTHer lEVeLs at $E=9$ When $g\riGHtARRow \InFtY$. UsInG ThEse tyPe oF argumeNts one can aSsiGn The spin to the EIgEnstates of The hamiltonian eVen If the tOtAl wAVe funCtiOn couLd be coMPlicatEd and most Of THe timeS Non-factORIzAble In a spin and a space pARt.
dYnamical excitaTion {#chAp5}
====================
iN SECTs. \[cHap3\] And \[chap4\] we hAvE concENtrated ON tHE STatIC properties of The fermioniC SysTem. In pArTicULar, we hAve anAlYZed The ground stAte aNd also the Main feATures of THe low-enErgy spEctRum. in thE PrEsEnt SeCTioN We TurN Our AttentioN tO tHe dynAmicS OF THe feRmiOnic SysteM in the harmoniC trAp. SiMUlaTing tHe dynAmicS oF quanTum manY-body SyStems is importanT for Current quAntUm TecHnOlogiCAl applIcaTioNs where One coulD For InSTANcE design quantum systEmS TO pRoduce deSired mANy-BoDY states aFtEr a CertAIN evolUtioN [@GlObal_optiMi.; @quenCH.bOs.; @Breath.bOs.]. a seconD rEleVanT aspeCT is tHat the Dynamics Of the SYstem reflects iN Many ways its inTErNAL sTRuctUre. in this sense, One cAN devIse a DYnAmiCAl evoLutioN iN OrDEr to unveil the spectrAl StructUre of The system [@exciTing_breathING_Mode]. This Is thE MaIN goal of this secTion. TO this aim we COnsider tWo difFerent peRturbatioNS To the groUnd StaTe oF thE SYsTem, which are seNSItivE tO the low-EneRgy specTra PreSenTed BeFore. The fiRst is a suDdEn ChAnGe iN the tRAp frequeNcY. ThIs PerTurbaTIon excItes bOth cEnTeR-Of-mAss and rELaTIVe moDeS oF the SysTeM and cAn be ANalYzed by cOmputing tHe dYNamiC sTrUcture fUnction. In the sEcOnd one, we nuMeRicAlly obTAIn the timE evolution of the system afTEr a suddEn qUench Of thE interactIon StrengTh. IN This caSe, the cEnter-Of-MasS MOdes aRE NoT exCiTed and we loOK For TraceS oF the InternaL structure on the timE EvoLution of the ceNtrAl deNSItY of THe CLouD.
SUDdeN CHange in the trap fRequency: brEaTHiNg mode {#sec5.1}
---------------------------------------------------
A WEll-KnOwn way tO study tHe intERnal strUcture of a Quantum maNy-Body SYSteM trapped in A harmoniC oscillatOR is by EXcIting The So callEd BreAthinG mode. IN ConTrast With thE KOhn (dipOle) moDe, Where the Cloud is initially displacEd from The miNimUm of the haRmoNIc pOtential [@kOhn.mOde], in our caSe wE stUdy thE reSPonse Of thE SySteM To a chAnge IN the trappINg FreQUEnCy. The main toOL | different energy, and non degenerat e. No tic e t ha t on e of them correspo n ds t o a center of mass exc itati on andt ha t mer ges wit h o t h erle ve lsat $E =9$ w hen $g\rig htarrow \i nft y$ . Using thes e t ype of arg ume nts one canass ign th espi n to t heeigen states of the Hamilton ia n eveni f the t o t al wav e function couldb ec omplicated and mostof th e tim esnon-factor iz ablei n a spi n a n d a s p ace part.
Dy namical exc i tat ion {# ch ap5 }
===== ===== == = === ====
In Se cts. \[chap3\ ] and\ [chap4\ ] we hav e conc ent rat ed o n t he st at i c p r op ert i esof the f er mi onicsyst e m . In p art icul ar, w e have analyz edtheg rou nd st ate a nd a ls o the mainfeatu re s of the low-en ergy spectrum . I nthe p resen t secti onweturn ou r atten t ion t o t he dynamics of the f er m i on ic syste m in t h eha r monic tr ap . S imul a t ing t he d y na mics ofquantu m m an y-bodysy stemsis im por tantf or c urrent quantum tech n ological appli c ations whereo ne c ou l d fo r i nstance des ignq uant um s y st ems to pr oduce d e si r ed many-body states a fter a cert ain evolution [@global_ o p t imi.; @q uenc h .b o s.; @breath.bo s.].A second r e levant a spect is that the dyna m i cs of th e s yst emref l e ct s in many way s itsin ternalstr ucture. In th issen se , one can deviseady na mi cal evol u tion inor der t o u nveil the sp ectra l st ru ct u reof thes ys t e m [@ ex ci ting _br ea thing _mod e ].This is the main go a l of t hi s secti on. To this a im we consid er tw o diff e r ent pert urbations to the ground state o f t he sy stem , which a resensit ive to the low-e nergy s pec t r a pre s e nt edbe fore. Thef i rst is a s udde n chang e in the trap freq u enc y. This pertu rba tion e xc ite s b o thce n ter - o f-mass and rela tive modes o f t he systema ndca n be an alyzedby co m putingthe dynam ic struct ur e fu n c tio n. In thesecond o ne, we nu m erica l ly obta inthe ti me ev oluti on oft hesyste m afte ra sudd en qu en ch of th e interaction strength. In th is ca se, the cent er- o f-m ass modes are not excit edand we l ook for t race s o f t h e int erna l structur e o n t h e t ime evoluti o n ofthe c ent r al den sity of the cloud.
S u dden change in the t rap fr e quen cy : breathing mo de{# s e c5.1}
-- -- ----------- -------- -- - ----- ------ ------ ------- -
A well-k nown wa y to stud y t he interna lst r ucture ofaquantu m many - body s ystem trapped in a ha r m onico sci llato ris by e x citi ng the socalled brea thingmode . Incontras twith t heKo hn (dipole ) mode, wh ere t he clou dis i nit iallydisp l a ced f romth e m inimum of t he ha rm o nic pot entia l[@ko hn.mode], in our c ase we stud ythe r espons e o f the system to a ch a n ge in thet rapp i ng frequ ency.The ma in tool | different_energy, and_non degenerate. Notice that_one of_them_corresponds to_a_center of mass_excitation and that_merges with other levels_at $E=9$ when_$g\rightarrow_\infty$. Using these type of arguments one can assign the spin to the eigenstates_of_the Hamiltonian_even_if_the total wave function could_be complicated and most of_the times_non-factorizable in a spin and a space part.
Dynamical_excitation_{#chap5}
====================
In Sects. \[chap3\] and \[chap4\]_we have concentrated on the static properties of the_fermionic system. In particular, we have_analyzed the ground_state_and_also the main features_of the low-energy spectrum. In the_present section we turn our attention_to the dynamics of the fermionic system_in the harmonic trap. Simulating the_dynamics of quantum many-body systems_is important_for current quantum technological applications_where one could_for instance_design quantum systems_to produce desired many-body states after_a certain evolution [@global_optimi.;_@quench.bos.; @breath.bos.]. A second relevant aspect_is_that the dynamics_of_the_system reflects_in many ways_its_internal structure._In_this sense, one can devise a_dynamical_evolution in order to unveil the spectral_structure of the system [@exciting_breathing_mode]._This_is the main goal_of this section. To this_aim we consider two different perturbations_to the_ground state_of the system, which are sensitive to the low-energy spectra presented_before. The first is a sudden_change in the trap_frequency. This_perturbation_excites both center-of-mass_and_relative modes_of the system and can be analyzed_by computing_the dynamic structure function. In the_second one, we numerically_obtain_the time evolution of the system_after a sudden quench of the_interaction strength. In this case,_the_center-of-mass_modes are not excited and_we look for traces of the_internal structure on_the time evolution of the central density_of_the cloud.
Sudden change in the trap_frequency:_breathing mode {#sec5.1}
---------------------------------------------------
A well-known way to_study_the_internal structure of a quantum_many-body system trapped in a harmonic_oscillator is by exciting the so called breathing mode._In contrast with_the Kohn (dipole) mode, where_the_cloud_is initially displaced from the minimum of the harmonic potential [@kohn.mode],_in our_case we study_the response of the system to a change in the_trapping frequency. The main tool |
left\langle z^jz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^iy^lz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^my^ny^jy^l\right\rangle, \left\langle z^k \right\rangle$ form a closed system of evolution equations given the flow field $\mathbf{u}$, and are also sufficient to describe the stress tensor $\sigma^{jk}$ in (\[stress2final\]) completely. It is possible to interpret these moments as tensor fields – see appendix **\[app:vect\]** for more details.
This is potentially a viable model for describing suspensions of molecules with stretching and bending degrees of freedom. This type of suspension can transmit angular momentum between adjacent fluid parcels.
Explicit formulae for the multibead-chain model {#sec:TNMmodelcont}
===============================================
Having investigated the $3$-bead chain as a concrete example, we now return to the general case. In section **\[sec:TNMmodel\]** we have considered the action of vector fields $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{Vect}(M)$ on functions on the $N^{th}$ order tangent bundle $T^{(N)}M$, which can be thought of as the configuration space of small $(N+1)$-bead chains living on a manifold $M$. We also considered the semidirect product relevant to the advection of such multibead chains in an ideal compressible fluid, and obtained the following semidirect Lie–Poisson bracket.
If $(\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi)$ denote the fluid momentum density, fluid mass density, and the distribution function of multibead-chains in configuration space, respectively, then for functionals $F,G$, the Poisson bracket is $$\begin{aligned}
\{F,G\}[\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi] =& -\left\langle \mathbf{m},\left[\frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m}},\frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}}\right] \right\rangle - \left\langle \rho, \frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m}} \cdot \frac{\delta G}{\delta \rho} - \frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}} \cdot \frac{\delta F}{\delta \rho} \right\rangle - \left\langle \psi, \left(\frac{\delta | left\langle z^jz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^iy^lz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^my^ny^jy^l\right\rangle, \left\langle z^k \right\rangle$ form a closed system of evolution equation render the flow field $ \mathbf{u}$, and are also sufficient to trace the stress tensor $ \sigma^{jk}$ in (\[stress2final\ ]) completely. It is potential to interpret these moments as tensor fields – attend appendix * * \[app: vect\ ] * * for more details.
This is potentially a viable mannequin for describing suspensions of atom with stretch and bending degrees of freedom. This type of suspension can convey angular momentum between adjacent fluid parcels.
Explicit formula for the multibead - chain model { # sec: TNMmodelcont }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Having investigated the $ 3$-bead chain as a concrete model, we now return to the general case. In section * * \[sec: TNMmodel\ ] * * we have study the action of vector fields $ \mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{Vect}(M)$ on functions on the $ N^{th}$ order tangent bundle $ T^{(N)}M$, which can be intend of as the configuration space of small $ (N+1)$-bead chains living on a manifold $ M$. We also considered the semidirect product relevant to the advection of such multibead chains in an ideal compressible fluid, and obtained the follow semidirect Lie – Poisson bracket.
If $ (\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi)$ denote the fluid momentum density, fluent bulk density, and the distribution function of multibead - chains in configuration space, respectively, then for functionals $ F, G$, the Poisson bracket is $ $ \begin{aligned }
\{F, G\}[\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi ] = & -\left\langle \mathbf{m},\left[\frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m}},\frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}}\right ] \right\rangle - \left\langle \rho, \frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m } } \cdot \frac{\delta G}{\delta \rho } - \frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m } } \cdot \frac{\delta F}{\delta \rho } \right\rangle - \left\langle \psi, \left(\frac{\delta | lefh\langle z^jz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^iy^lz^k \rigit\rangls, \left\lavgle y^my^ny^jy^l\right\rangle, \lefv\lantle z^j \right\rangle$ form a cuosed sysnem of evilutmon equations gitsn the njow rleld $\kethbf{u}$, and are slso suffiwient to descrhbd che stress tensor $\sigma^{jk}$ in (\[stress2fynal\]) cokppetely. It is pjssinje tk interpret these moments as tensod fieldv – see appendox **\[app:vect\]** for more detaild.
Thid is potentially a viable modgm fje describing suspensions of molecumes with stretching and bending degrzes of freeeon. Tjhs type of wuspegsion can transmit atgular komentum betwecn adoacebt fluid parcels.
Explirit formulae for the multibeag-ckain model {#sec:TNMmodeocint}
===============================================
Haeing invdwtieattd vhe $3$-bead fhamn as a condrete exampoe, we now return to trv general cass. In sqceion **\[sec:TNMmodel\]** we have considered the acfion of vector fields $\mqthbf{u}\in\mathrm{Vect}(M)$ oj functiogs on the $N^{th}$ order tangent bundle $T^{(N)}M$, which can te thkjghu if as rhf configuration space of small $(N+1)$-bead chains lybimg on a manifold $M$. We also vojsoqered the semkdirecc pdoduct relevant to the addectiin of sucr muktibead chains in an ideal xompressible dluid, and obtained the follownng sekidirrct Lie–Poisson bracket.
Iy $(\mathgf{m},\rho,\psi)$ dfnote the wluid momentum ddnspty, xluid mass density, and the distribuvion yunction of kultibqad-chains ln cokxiguration space, rfspecjively, then for vunctionals $F,G$, the Poisson bracket is $$\begin{alogted}
\{X,G\}[\mathbf{i},\rho,\pxi] =& -\left\langlq \mathbf{m},\left[\ftac{\delta Y}{\delta \mathbf{m}},\frzc{\delta G}{\delta \matrbf{m}}\right] \rigvj\rangle - \left\nangle \rro, \feac{\dwlta F}{\dduta \mathbf{m}} \cdpt \frac{\delta G}{\delta \rho} - \frac{\delta G}{\dclta \ozthbf{m}} \cdot \frae{\beota F}{\delta \rho} \tigft\rwnhlx - \lesd\langle \psi, \neft(\wraz{\celta | left\langle z^jz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^iy^lz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle z^k form a system of evolution $\mathbf{u}$, are also sufficient describe the stress $\sigma^{jk}$ in (\[stress2final\]) completely. It is to interpret these moments as tensor fields – see appendix **\[app:vect\]** for more This is potentially a viable model for describing suspensions of molecules with stretching bending of This of suspension can transmit angular momentum between adjacent fluid parcels. Explicit formulae for the multibead-chain model =============================================== Having investigated the $3$-bead chain as a example, we now return the general case. In section we considered the of fields on functions on $N^{th}$ order tangent bundle $T^{(N)}M$, which can be thought of as the configuration space of small $(N+1)$-bead living on $M$. We considered semidirect relevant to the such multibead chains in an ideal obtained the following semidirect Lie–Poisson bracket. If $(\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi)$ the fluid density, fluid mass density, and the function of multibead-chains in configuration space, respectively, then functionals $F,G$, the Poisson bracket is $$\begin{aligned} \{F,G\}[\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi] =& -\left\langle \mathbf{m},\left[\frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m}},\frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}}\right] \left\langle \rho, \frac{\delta F}{\delta \cdot \frac{\delta G}{\delta - G}{\delta \cdot F}{\delta \rho} - \left\langle \psi, \left(\frac{\delta | left\langle z^jz^k \right\rangle, \Left\langle Y^iy^lz^K \riGht\RaNgle, \Left\Langle y^my^ny^jy^l\RIght\Rangle, \left\langle z^k \righT\rangLe$ FOrm a CLoSed syStem of eVOlUTIon EqUaTioNs GIvEn the FloW field $\mAthbf{u}$, and aRe aLsO sufficient tO DeScribe the sTreSs tensor $\sigmA^{jk}$ In (\[streSs2FinAL\]) compLetEly. It Is possIBle to iNterpret tHeSE momenTS as tensOR FiElds – See appendix **\[app:vecT\]** FoR More details.
ThiS is potEnTIaLLY a vIabLe model for DeScribINg suspeNSiONS Of mOLecules with stRetching and BEndIng degReEs oF FreedoM. This TyPE of Suspension cAn trAnsmit angUlar moMEntum beTWeen adjAcent fLuiD paRcelS.
exPlIciT fORmuLAe For THe mUltibead-ChAiN modeL {#sec:tnmMOdelConT}
===============================================
HavIng inVestigated the $3$-BeaD chaIN as A concRete eXampLe, We now Return To the GeNeral case. In sectIon **\[sEc:TNMmodeL\]** we HaVe cOnSiderED the acTioN of Vector fIelds $\maTHbf{U}\iN\MAThRm{Vect}(M)$ on functions On THE $N^{Th}$ order tAngent BUnDlE $t^{(N)}M$, which CaN be ThouGHT of as The cONfIguratioN space OF sMaLl $(N+1)$-bead ChAins liViNg oN a mAnifoLD $M$. We Also coNsidered The seMIdirect product RElevant to the aDVeCTIoN Of suCh mUltibead chaIns iN An idEal cOMpResSIble fLuid, aNd OBtAIned the following semIdIrect LIe–PoiSson bracket.
If $(\Mathbf{m},\rho,\PSI)$ Denote thE fluID mOMentum density, fLuid mAss density, ANd the disTribuTion funcTion of mulTIBead-chaiNs iN coNfiGurATIoN space, respectIVEly, tHeN for funCtiOnals $F,G$, The poiSsoN brAcKet is $$\begiN{aligned}
\{f,G\}[\MaThBf{M},\rhO,\psi] =& -\lEFt\langle \MaThbF{m},\LefT[\frac{\DElta F}{\dElta \mAthbF{m}},\FrAC{\deLta G}{\delTA \mATHbf{m}}\RiGhT] \rigHt\rAnGle - \leFt\laNGle \Rho, \frac{\Delta F}{\delTa \mAThbf{M}} \cDoT \frac{\deLta G}{\delta \rho} - \fRaC{\delta G}{\delTa \MatHbf{m}} \cdOT \Frac{\deltA F}{\delta \rho} \right\rangle - \leFT\langle \Psi, \Left(\fRac{\dElta | left\langle z^jz^k \right\ rangle, \l eft\l ang ley^ iy^l z^k\right\rangle, \lef t\langle y^my^ny^jy^l\ right \r a ngle , \ left\ langlez ^k \ rig ht \r ang le $ f orm a cl osed sy stem of ev olu ti on equations gi ven the fl owfield $\math bf{ u}$, a nd ar e also su ffici ent to descri be the st re s s tens o r $\sig m a ^{ jk}$ in (\[stress2fin a l\ ] ) completely.It ispo s si b l e t o i nterpret t he se mo m ents as te n s o r f i elds – see ap pendix **\[ a pp: vect\] ** fo r moredetai ls .
T his is pote ntia lly a via ble mo d el ford escribi ng sus pen sio ns o f m ol ecu le s wi t hstr e tch ing andbe nd ing d egre e s o f fr eed om.Thistype of suspe nsi on c a n t ransm it an gula rmomen tum be tween a djacent fluid p arce ls.
Expl ici tfor mu lae f o r themul tib ead-cha in mode l {# se c : T NM modelcont}
======= == = = == ======== ====== = == == = ======== == === =
H a v ing i nves t ig ated the $3$-b e ad c hain as a concr et e e xam ple,w e no w retu rn to th e gen e ral case. In s e ction **\[sec : TN M m od e l\]* * w e have cons ider e d th e ac t io n o f vect or fi el d s$ \mathbf{u}\in\mathr m{ Vect}( M)$ o n functions o n the $N^{ t h } $ ordertang e nt bundle $T^{(N) }M$,which canb e though t ofas the c onfigurat i o n spaceofsma ll$(N + 1 )$ -bead chainsl i ving o n a man ifo ld $M$. We al socon si dered the semidir ec tpr od uct rele v ant to t he ad ve cti on of such m ultib eadch ai n s i n an id e al c ompr es si bleflu id , and obt a ine d the f ollowingsem i dire ct L ie–Pois son bracket.
I f $(\mathb f{ m}, \rho,\ p s i)$ deno te the fluid momentum d e nsity,flu id ma ss d ensity, a ndthe di str i bution funct ion o fmul t i bead- c h ai nsin configura t i onspace ,resp ectivel y, then for functi o nal s $F,G$, thePoi sson b ra cke t i s $$ \b e gin { a ligned}
\{F,G\} [\mathbf{m }, \ rh o,\psi] =& -\l ef t\langl e \math bf{m} , \left[\ frac{\del ta F}{\de lt a \m a t hbf {m}},\frac {\deltaG}{\delta \math b f{ m}}\r igh t] \ri gh t\r angle - \le f t\l angle \rho, \ frac{\ delta F }{\delta \mathbf{m}} \cdot \fra c{\del ta G} {\d elta \rho } - \fr ac{\delta G}{ \delta \ma thb f{m }} \c dot \frac {\de l ta F} { \delt a \r h o} \right \ ra ngl e -\left\langl e \ psi , \le ft( \ frac{\ delt a | left\langle z^jz^k_\right\rangle, \left\langle_y^iy^lz^k \right\rangle, \left\langle y^my^ny^jy^l\right\rangle,_\left\langle z^k_\right\rangle$_form a_closed_system of evolution_equations given the_flow field $\mathbf{u}$, and_are also sufficient_to_describe the stress tensor $\sigma^{jk}$ in (\[stress2final\]) completely. It is possible to interpret these_moments_as tensor_fields_–_see appendix **\[app:vect\]** for more_details.
This is potentially a viable_model for_describing suspensions of molecules with stretching and bending_degrees_of freedom. This_type of suspension can transmit angular momentum between adjacent_fluid parcels.
Explicit formulae for the multibead-chain_model {#sec:TNMmodelcont}
===============================================
Having investigated_the_$3$-bead_chain as a concrete_example, we now return to the_general case. In section **\[sec:TNMmodel\]** we_have considered the action of vector fields_$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{Vect}(M)$ on functions on the $N^{th}$_order tangent bundle $T^{(N)}M$, which_can be_thought of as the configuration_space of small_$(N+1)$-bead chains_living on a_manifold $M$. We also considered the_semidirect product relevant_to the advection of such multibead_chains_in an ideal_compressible_fluid,_and obtained_the following semidirect_Lie–Poisson_bracket.
If $(\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi)$_denote_the fluid momentum density, fluid mass_density,_and the distribution function of multibead-chains in_configuration space, respectively, then_for_functionals $F,G$, the Poisson_bracket is $$\begin{aligned}
\{F,G\}[\mathbf{m},\rho,\psi] =& -\left\langle_\mathbf{m},\left[\frac{\delta F}{\delta \mathbf{m}},\frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}}\right] \right\rangle_- \left\langle_\rho, \frac{\delta_F}{\delta \mathbf{m}} \cdot \frac{\delta G}{\delta \rho} - \frac{\delta G}{\delta \mathbf{m}} \cdot_\frac{\delta F}{\delta \rho} \right\rangle - \left\langle_\psi, \left(\frac{\delta |
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq J.$ As in the proof of Proposition 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau} & =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
& =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\
& =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\
& =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correct. The proof for $\phi_{J+1}$ follows similarly. *Q.E.D.*
**Proof of Theorem 3:** Given in text.
**Proof of Theorem 4:** Given in text.
**Proof of Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $\psi | beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $ 2\leq
j\leq J.$ As in the proof of Proposition 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $ w_{t}$ we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begin{aligned }
\frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau } & = -\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
& = -\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\
& = -\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\
& = E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $ \phi_{j}$ is right. The validation for $ \phi_{J+1}$ stick to similarly. * Q.E.D. *
* * Proof of Theorem 3 :* * Given in textbook.
* * Proof of Theorem 4 :* * Given in textbook.
* * Proof of Theorem 5 :* * Let $ \bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $ \psi | betw,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq J.$ As in the proof of 'roposifion 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we have$$\fcac{\pqrtiao}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=D[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{u}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{q_{t}-E[w_{u}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begih{wliguev}
\frac{\partial E[m(e_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\dau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partidl\gab} & =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
Q[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},u_{tu}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
& =-\dekea\frzb{\pcrtial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{h_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{uj}=1,\tau]].\\
& =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{fj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,h+1}+H_{t+1}-\gwmma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{h})]\\
& =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\bgfa_{0},\gwnma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\dnd{aligned}$$ showing thaj the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correcg. The proof for $\pyi_{J+1}$ xollows simmlarly. *Q.E.D.*
**Proof of Theorem 3:** Given on text.
**Proof on Themren 4:** Given in text.
**Proof mf Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\ksi}(\gamma,\lakbba)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambea)]$. Suppmse dhat $\psi | beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq j\leq J.$ As in of 4 of (1994a), for any that$$\begin{aligned} E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau} & =-\delta E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\ & =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\ =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\ & =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correct. The proof for $\phi_{J+1}$ follows similarly. *Q.E.D.* **Proof Theorem 3:** Given in text. **Proof of Theorem 4:** Given in text. **Proof Theorem Let (z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. that $\psi | beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq j.$ As in the prOof of proPosItIon 4 oF NewEy (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we hAVe$$\frAc{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|X_{t},y_{tj}=1,\TaU]=e[\fraC{Y_{tJ}}{P_{j}(\tiLde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-e[W_{t}|X_{T},Y_{tj}=1]\}s(z_{T})|x_{T}].$$ It FoLLoWs thaT$$\beGin{aligNed}
\frac{\parTiaL E[M(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{J}(\TaU),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\parTiaL\tau} & =-\delta E[A(x_{T})P_{vJ}(\tilde{V}_{t})\FraC{\PartiAl
E[U_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{T},y_{tj}=1,\taU]}{\PartiaL\tau}]\\
& =-\delta\FrAC{\partiAL}{\partiaL\TAu}e[E[A(x_{T})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},Y_{Tj}=1,\TAu]].\\
& =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\Tilde{v}_{T})\fRAc{Y_{TJ}}{P_{j}(\TilDe{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gaMmA_{j0}(x_{t},\bETa_{0},\gamma_{1})\}s(Z_{t})]\\
& =e[\PHI_{j}(z_{T},\Beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambDa_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aliGNed}$$ ShowinG tHat THe formUla foR $\pHI_{j}$ iS correct. The ProoF for $\phi_{J+1}$ fOllows SImilarlY. *q.E.D.*
**ProoF of TheOreM 3:** GiVen iN TeXt.
**proOf OF ThEOrEm 4:** GIVen In text.
**PrOoF oF TheoRem 5:** LET $\BAR{\psi}(\GamMa,\laMbda)=E[\Psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gammA,\laMbda)]$. sUppOse thAt $\psi | beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for$2\leq
j\l eq J. $ A s i ntheproo f of Propositi o n 4of Newey (1994a), forany $ w_ { t}$w ehave$ $\frac{ \ pa r t ial }{ \p art ia l \t au}E[ w_{ t}|x_{t },y_{tj}=1 ,\t au ]=E[\frac{y_ { tj }}{P_{j}(\ til de{v}_{t})}\ {w_ {t}-E[ w_ {t} | x_{t} ,y_ {tj}= 1]\}S( z _{t})| x_{t}].$$ I t follo w s that$ $ \ be gin{ aligned}
\frac{\p a rt i al E[m(z_{t},\ beta_{ 0} , \g a m ma_ {j} (\tau),\ga mm a_{-j , 0})]}{\ p ar t i a l\t a u} & =-\del ta E[A(x_{t } )P_ {vj}(\ ti lde { v}_{t} )\fra c{ \ par tial
E[u_{1 ,t+1 }+H_{t+1} |x_{t} , y_{tj}= 1 ,\tau]} {\part ial \ta u}]\ \
& =-\ de l ta\ f ra c{\ p art ial}{\pa rt ia l\tau }E[E [ A ( x _{t} )P_ {vj} (\til de{v}_{t})\{u _{1 ,t+1 } +H_ {t+1} \}|x_ {t}, y_ {tj}= 1,\tau ]].\\
& =-\delta E[A( x_{t })P_{vj}( \ti ld e{v }_ {t})\ f rac{y_ {tj }}{ P_{j}(\ tilde{v } _{t }) } \ { u_ {1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\g am m a _{ j0}(x_{t },\bet a _{ 0} , \gamma_{ 1} )\} S(z_ { t })]\\
& = E[ \phi_{j} (z_{t} , \b et a_{0},\ ga mma_{0 }, \la mbd a_{0} ) S(z_ {t})], \end{ali gned} $ $ showing that the formula f o r$ \ ph i _{j} $ i s correct.Thep roof for $\ phi _ {J+1} $ fol lo w ss imilarly. *Q.E.D.*
* *Proof of T heorem 3:** G iven in te x t .
**Proo f of Th e orem 4:** Give n intext.
**P r oof of T heore m 5:** L et $\bar{ \ p si}(\gam ma, \la mbd a)= E [ \p si
(z_{i},\be t a _{0} ,\ gamma,\ lam bda)]$. Su ppo setha t$\psi | beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for_$2\leq
j\leq J.$_As in the proof_of Proposition_4_of Newey_(1994a),_for any $w_{t}$_we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It_follows that$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau} _& =-\delta_E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
&_ =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\
& =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\
& =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is_correct._The proof_for_$\phi_{J+1}$_follows similarly. *Q.E.D.*
**Proof of Theorem_3:** Given in text.
**Proof of Theorem_4:** Given in_text.
**Proof of Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $\psi |
. Phys.: Condens. Matter **25**, 216005 (2013).
P. Mandal, P. Choudhury, S. K. Biswas, and B. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B **70**, 104407 (2004).
M. Kriener, C. Zobel, A. Reichl, J. Baier, M. Cwik, K. Berggold, H. Kierspel, O. Zabara, A. Freimuth, and T. Lorenz, Phys. Rev. B **69**, 094417 (2004).
J. Wu and C. Leighton, Phys. Rev. B **67**, 174408 (2003).
D. Samal and P. S. Anil Kumar, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter **23**, 016001 (2011).
A. P. Sazonov, I. O. Troyanchuk, H. Gamari-Seale, V. V. Sikolenko, K. L. Stefanopoulos, G. K. Nicolaides, and Y. K. Atanassova, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter **21**, 156004 (2009).
J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, Phys. B (Amsterdam) **192**, 55 (1993); Program [FULLPROF]{}, LLB-JRC, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-Saclay, France, 1996.
I. Fita, R. Szymczak, R. Puzniak, A.Wisniewski, I. O. Troyanchuk, D. V. Karpinsky, V. Markovich, and H. Szymczak, Phys. Rev. B **83**, 064414 (2011).
S. D. Tiwari and K. P. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. B **72**, 104433 (2005).
J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An Experperimental Introduction (Taylor and Francis London 1993).
V. Bisht and K. P. Rajeev, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter **22**, 016003 (2010).
I. G. Deac, J. F. Mitchell, and P. Schiffer, Phys. Rev. B **63**, | . Phys. : Condens. Matter * * 25 * *, 216005 (2013).
P. Mandal, P. Choudhury, S. K. Biswas, and B. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B * * 70 * *, 104407 (2004).
M. Kriener, C. Zobel, A. Reichl, J. Baier, M. Cwik, K. Berggold, H. Kierspel, O. Zabara, A. Freimuth, and T. Lorenz, Phys. Rev. B * * 69 * *, 094417 (2004).
J. Wu and C. Leighton, Phys. Rev. B * * 67 * *, 174408 (2003).
D. Samal and P. S. Anil Kumar, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter * * 23 * *, 016001 (2011).
A. P. Sazonov, I. O. Troyanchuk, H. Gamari - Seale, V. V. Sikolenko, K. L. Stefanopoulos, G. K. Nicolaides, and Y. K. Atanassova, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter * * 21 * *, 156004 (2009).
J. Rodríguez - Carvajal, Phys. B (Amsterdam) * * 192 * *, 55 (1993); Program [ FULLPROF ] { }, LLB - JRC, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA - Saclay, France, 1996.
I. Fita, R. Szymczak, R. Puzniak, A.Wisniewski, I. O. Troyanchuk, D. V. Karpinsky, V. Markovich, and H. Szymczak, Phys. Rev. B * * 83 * *, 064414 (2011).
S. D. Tiwari and K. P. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. B * * 72 * *, 104433 (2005).
J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An Experperimental Introduction (Taylor and Francis London 1993).
V. Bisht and K. P. Rajeev, J. Phys. : Condens. topic * * 22 * *, 016003 (2010).
I. G. Deac, J. F. Mitchell, and P. Schiffer, Phys. Rev. B * * 63 * *, | . Phjs.: Condens. Matter **25**, 216005 (2013).
P. Makdal, P. Choudhury, S. K. Bivwas, ahd B. Ghorh, Phys. Rev. B **70**, 104407 (2004).
M. Kriener, C. Vobeo, A. Rtpchl, J. Baier, M. Cwik, K. Berggold, H. Kierspel, I. Zabara, A. Hdeimuth, and T. Poreuz, Phys. Rev. B **69**, 094417 (2004).
M. Wu and C. Neighton, Phys. Sex. Y **67**, 174408 (2003).
D. Samal and P. S. Anil Kumar, J. Phyf.: Condems. Matter **23**, 016001 (2011).
A. P. Fazomjv, I. O. Troyanchuk, H. Gamari-Seale, V. V. Siiolenko, K. L. Stefanoppulos, G. K. Nicolaides, and Y. K. Ahanassova, J. Phys.: Clndens. Mattgd **21**, 156004 (2009).
H. Rodríguez-Cafvajal, Phys. B (Amsterdaj) **192**, 55 (1993); Program [FULLPROF]{}, LLB-JRC, Lacoratpire Léon Btnolokhn, CEA-Saclab, Franbe, 1996.
I. Fita, R. Sdjmczak, S. Puznisk, A.Wisniewski, I. M. Teoyanchuk, D. V. Karpinsny, V. Markovich, and H. Szymczdk, Phys. Rev. B **83**, 064414 (2011).
S. D. Tuwari and K. P. Eajdev, Piys. Rev. B **72**, 104433 (2005).
O. A. Mydosh, Apin Glassew: An Experperimentak Ybtroduction (Tzylor wnq Francis London 1993).
V. Bisht and K. P. Rajeev, J. Lhys. : Condens. Matter **22**, 016003 (2010).
U. G. Deac, J. F. Mitchell, and P. Scriffer, Phys. Rev. B **63**, | . Phys.: Condens. Matter **25**, 216005 (2013). P. S. K. and B. Ghosh, (2004). Kriener, C. Zobel, Reichl, J. Baier, Cwik, K. Berggold, H. Kierspel, O. A. Freimuth, and T. Lorenz, Phys. Rev. B **69**, 094417 (2004). J. Wu C. Leighton, Phys. Rev. B **67**, 174408 (2003). D. Samal and P. S. Kumar, Phys.: Matter 016001 (2011). A. P. Sazonov, I. O. Troyanchuk, H. Gamari-Seale, V. V. Sikolenko, K. L. Stefanopoulos, K. Nicolaides, and Y. K. Atanassova, J. Phys.: Matter **21**, 156004 (2009). Rodríguez-Carvajal, Phys. B (Amsterdam) **192**, (1993); [FULLPROF]{}, LLB-JRC, Léon CEA-Saclay, 1996. I. Fita, Szymczak, R. Puzniak, A.Wisniewski, I. O. Troyanchuk, D. V. Karpinsky, V. Markovich, and H. Szymczak, Phys. Rev. **83**, 064414 D. Tiwari K. Rajeev, Rev. B **72**, J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An and Francis London 1993). V. Bisht and K. Rajeev, J. : Condens. Matter **22**, 016003 (2010). G. Deac, J. F. Mitchell, and P. Schiffer, Rev. B **63**, | . Phys.: Condens. Matter **25**, 216005 (2013).
P. Mandal, P. choudhury, S. k. BiswAs, aNd B. ghOsh, PHys. REv. B **70**, 104407 (2004).
M. Kriener, C. ZoBEl, A. REichl, J. Baier, M. Cwik, K. BerggOld, H. KIeRSpel, o. zaBara, A. freimutH, AnD t. lorEnZ, PHys. reV. b **69**, 094417 (2004).
J. wu and c. LeIghton, PHys. Rev. B **67**, 174408 (2003).
D. SaMal AnD P. S. Anil Kumar, j. phYs.: Condens. MAttEr **23**, 016001 (2011).
A. P. Sazonov, I. o. TrOyanchUk, h. GaMAri-SeAle, v. V. SikOlenko, k. l. StefaNopoulos, G. k. NIColaidES, and Y. K. ATANaSsovA, J. Phys.: Condens. MattER **21**, 156004 (2009).
J. rOdríguez-CarvajAl, Phys. b (AMStERDam) **192**, 55 (1993); proGram [FULLPRoF]{}, lLB-JRc, laboratOIrE lÉOn BRIllouin, CEA-SacLay, France, 1996.
I. FITa, R. szymczAk, r. PuZNiak, A.WIsnieWsKI, I. O. troyanchuk, D. v. KarPinsky, V. MaRkovicH, And H. SzyMCzak, PhyS. Rev. B **83**, 064414 (2011).
S. d. TiWarI and k. p. RAjEev, phYS. ReV. b **72**, 104433 (2005).
J. a. MyDOsh, spin GlasSeS: AN ExpeRperIMENTal INtrOducTion (TAylor and FrancIs LOndoN 1993).
v. BiSht anD K. P. RaJeev, j. PHys. : CoNdens. MAtter **22**, 016003 (2010).
i. G. deac, J. F. Mitchell, aNd P. SChiffer, PhYs. REv. b **63**, | . Phys.: Condens. Matter * *25**, 216 005 ( 201 3).
P. M anda l, P. Choudhur y , S. K. Biswas, and B. Gho sh, P hy s . Re v .B **7 0**, 10 4 40 7 (20 04 ).
M .K ri ener, C. Zobel, A. Reichl , J .Baier, M. Cw i k, K. Berggo ld, H. Kierspel , O . Zaba ra , A . Frei mut h, an d T. L o renz,Phys. Rev .B **69* * , 09441 7 (2 004) .
J. Wu and C. L e ig h ton, Phys. Rev . B ** 67 * *, 1 744 08(2003).
D .Samal and P.S .A n i l K u mar, J. Phys. : Condens.M att er **2 3* *,0 16001(2011 ).
A. P. Sazonov , I. O. Troya nchuk, H. Gama r i-Seale , V. V . S iko lenk o ,K. L. S t efa n op oul o s,G. K. Ni co la ides, and Y . K. A tan asso va, J . Phys.: Cond ens . Ma t ter **21 **, 1 5600 4(2009 ).
J. Rodr íg uez-Carvajal, P hys. B (Amste rda m) ** 19 2**,5 5 (199 3); Pr ogram [ FULLPRO F ]{} ,L L B -J RC, Laboratoire Lé on B ri llouin,CEA-Sa c la y, France,19 96.
I. F ita,R. S z ym czak, R. Puzni a k, A .Wisnie ws ki, I. O . T roy anchu k , D. V. Ka rpinsky, V. M a rkovich, and H . Szymczak, Ph y s. R ev . B * *83 **, 064414(201 1 ).
S. D . T iwa r i and K. P .R aj e ev, Phys. Rev. B ** 72 **, 10 4433(2005).
J. A . Mydosh,S p i n Glasse s: A n E x perperimentalIntro duction (T a ylor and Fran cis Lond on 1993). V. Bisht an d K . P . R a j ee v, J. Phys. : C onde ns . Matte r * *22**,016 003 (2 010 ).
I. G. D eac, J.F. M it ch ell , and P. Schif fe r,Ph ys. Rev. B **63 **, | . Phys.:_Condens. Matter_**25**, 216005 (2013).
P. Mandal,_P. Choudhury,_S._K. Biswas,_and_B. Ghosh, Phys._Rev. B **70**,_104407 (2004).
M. Kriener, C._Zobel, A. Reichl,_J._Baier, M. Cwik, K. Berggold, H. Kierspel, O. Zabara, A. Freimuth, and T. Lorenz,_Phys._Rev. B_**69**,_094417_(2004).
J. Wu and C. Leighton,_Phys. Rev. B **67**, 174408_(2003).
D. Samal_and P. S. Anil Kumar, J. Phys.: Condens._Matter_**23**, 016001 (2011).
A._P. Sazonov, I. O. Troyanchuk, H. Gamari-Seale, V. V._Sikolenko, K. L. Stefanopoulos, G. K._Nicolaides, and Y._K._Atanassova,_J. Phys.: Condens. Matter_**21**, 156004 (2009).
J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, Phys. B_(Amsterdam) **192**, 55 (1993); Program [FULLPROF]{},_LLB-JRC, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-Saclay, France, 1996.
I._Fita, R. Szymczak, R. Puzniak, A.Wisniewski,_I. O. Troyanchuk, D. V._Karpinsky, V._Markovich, and H. Szymczak, Phys._Rev. B **83**,_064414 (2011).
S._D. Tiwari and_K. P. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. B_**72**, 104433 (2005).
J._A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An Experperimental_Introduction_(Taylor and Francis_London_1993).
V._Bisht and_K. P. Rajeev,_J._Phys. :_Condens._Matter **22**, 016003 (2010).
I. G. Deac,_J._F. Mitchell, and P. Schiffer, Phys. Rev._B **63**, |
a first numerical experiment we have performed the robust stability test as described in [@Alcubierre03d]. For this test one takes Minkowski initial data and adds random noise with a small amplitude to all dynamical variables. For the evolution we have used both harmonic slicing with $f=1$ and standard 1+log slicing with $f=2/\alpha$.
For the simulations discussed below we used 1,000 grid points, a grid spacing of $\Delta r = 0.001$ and a time step $\Delta t = \Delta r/2$. Furthermore, we have demanded periodic boundary conditions and have set all $1/r$ and $1/r^2$ terms to zero by hand (i.e. we are performing the run “at infinity”). Setting these terms to zero should have no important effect on the presence of blow-ups since one can readily verify that such terms are only linear in the eigenfields. Moreover, one could easily regularize the equations at the origin by following the procedure described in [@Alcubierre04a], but doing so would only obscure the study of blow-ups by mixing them with purely geometric effects.
We start the simulations with Minkowski initial data plus random noise of order $10^{-6}$ on all evolution variables. At latter times we compute the error $\delta$ as the average absolute value over the grid of the quantity $(\sum_{i=1}^3 |u_i - 1| + \sum_{i=1}^5
|v_i|)/8$.
We first performed runs for the ADM system without adding constraints, and observed the well known growth in the average error caused by the fact that ADM is only weakly hyperbolic. Next, we implemented the $\mu$-family given by (\[eq:hKBmu\]) and (\[eq:sourcehK\]), which according to the source criteria is shock-avoiding. Figure \[fig:mu\] shows the behavior of the average error for this family. In the top panel we plot the growth of the error for the case of harmonic slicing as a function of time (measured in units of the light-crossing time of our computational grid), for several different values of $|\mu|$. We see that for ADM (which is not a member of the $\mu$-family), and for the cases with $\mu=0$ and $|\mu| = 1$, the error grows linearly with time, while for $|\mu| = 1 | a first numerical experiment we have performed the robust constancy trial as described in [ @Alcubierre03d ]. For this test one lead Minkowski initial datum and adds random noise with a small amplitude to all dynamic variable. For the evolution we have use both harmonic slicing with $ f=1 $ and standard 1+log slice with $ f=2/\alpha$.
For the simulations discussed below we use 1,000 power system points, a grid space of $ \Delta r = 0.001 $ and a meter measure $ \Delta t = \Delta r/2$. Furthermore, we have demanded periodic boundary conditions and have set all $ 1 / r$ and $ 1 / r^2 $ term to zero by hand (i.e. we are performing the run “ at infinity ”). set these terms to zero should have no important effect on the presence of gust - ups since one can readily verify that such terms are only linear in the eigenfields. Moreover, one could easily regularize the equations at the origin by following the procedure described in [ @Alcubierre04a ], but doing so would only obscure the survey of blow - ups by mixing them with strictly geometric effect.
We begin the simulations with Minkowski initial data plus random randomness of order $ 10^{-6}$ on all development variables. At latter times we compute the mistake $ \delta$ as the average absolute value over the grid of the quantity $ (\sum_{i=1}^3 |u_i - 1| + \sum_{i=1}^5
|v_i|)/8$.
We first performed runs for the ADM system without adding constraints, and observed the well known increase in the average mistake caused by the fact that ADM is only weakly hyperbolic. Next, we implemented the $ \mu$-family given by (\[eq: hKBmu\ ]) and (\[eq: sourcehK\ ]), which harmonize to the source criteria is shock - avoiding. name \[fig: mu\ ] shows the behavior of the average error for this kin. In the top panel we plot the increase of the error for the event of harmonic slice as a function of time (measure in units of the light - cross time of our computational power system), for several different values of $ |\mu|$. We go steady that for ADM (which is not a member of the $ \mu$-family), and for the cases with $ \mu=0 $ and $ |\mu| = 1 $, the error grows linearly with time, while for $ |\mu| = 1 | a virst numerical experimekt we have perfotmwd the robusf stabilkty test as described in [@Alcuuieree03d]. Fir this test one takes Minkowskp initial date and adds random noise with a dmaln amplitude to sll dynamiwal variables. Xof che evolution we have used both harmjnic sloclng with $f=1$ and stamqard 1+log slicing with $f=2/\alpha$.
For the sijulatiois discussed bekow we used 1,000 grid points, a grif spacing of $\Delta r = 0.001$ and a jjme wtep $\Delta t = \Delta r/2$. Furthermore, se have demanded periodic boundxry cpnditions qne hwee set all $1/c$ and $1/g^2$ terms to zevp by hdnd (i.e. ee are performlng tie ryn “at infinity”). Settinj these terms to zerj should vare no important effecr in thg prevencd of blkw-nps since onx can readimy verify tyat such terms are pnjj linear in tge eigqnsields. Moreover, one could easily regulagize the equations at the oeigin by following thg procedurq described in [@Alcubierre04a], but doing so would only obscnrd tkc rrufy of blow-ups by mixing them with purely geomqfroc effects.
We stavt the simulations wltn Minkowski inktial bztz plus random noisf of orqer $10^{-6}$ in all evjlutoon variables. At latter timws we computv thw error $\delta$ as tke average aysolutg valur over the grid of the duanfity $(\sum_{i=1}^3 |u_l - 1| + \sum_{i=1}^5
|b_k|)/8$.
We first perforoed rgns for ufe ADM system witrout addiig coustraintr, anc obsewved the wfll kkmwn growth in the wveraye ersor caused by the fact that ADM is only wxekly hyperboloc. Neqt, we impjemenbed the $\mu$-familr given by (\[eq:hLBmu\]) anb (\[eq:sojrcehK\]), whibh accordmng to the sjurce criterid is shock-avomding. Figtre \[fug:mu\] shows gfe behavior of the avercye error dor this family. In thg fop panel we plit uhw growth of thr efrow voc the wase of harmmnic slkving xs a functiiv of time (measured in unhts kf the light-crossimg time of our com[utational grod), for several difverenv valuxs of $|\ku|$. Re see that for ADM (which is nkt a membfr jf the $\mu$-famyly), qnd for the eases with $\mu=0$ and $|\mu| = 1$, the error grows lmnearly with time, whilg for $|\mu| = 1 | a first numerical experiment we have performed stability as described [@Alcubierre03d]. For this data adds random noise a small amplitude all dynamical variables. For the evolution have used both harmonic slicing with $f=1$ and standard 1+log slicing with $f=2/\alpha$. the simulations discussed below we used 1,000 grid points, a grid spacing of r 0.001$ a step $\Delta t = \Delta r/2$. Furthermore, we have demanded periodic boundary conditions and have set $1/r$ and $1/r^2$ terms to zero by hand we are performing the “at infinity”). Setting these terms zero have no effect the of blow-ups since can readily verify that such terms are only linear in the eigenfields. Moreover, one could easily regularize equations at by following procedure in but doing so obscure the study of blow-ups by purely geometric effects. We start the simulations with initial data random noise of order $10^{-6}$ on evolution variables. At latter times we compute the $\delta$ as the average absolute value over the grid of the quantity $(\sum_{i=1}^3 |u_i - \sum_{i=1}^5 |v_i|)/8$. We first runs for the system adding and the well growth in the average error caused by the fact that ADM only weakly hyperbolic. Next, we implemented the $\mu$-family given by (\[eq:sourcehK\]), according to the criteria is shock-avoiding. Figure shows behavior of the average this In we the of the error for case of harmonic slicing as function of time (measured time of our computational grid), for several different of $|\mu|$. We see that for ADM is not a member of the $\mu$-family), and for the cases with and $|\mu| the error grows linearly with time, while for = 1 | a first numerical experiment We have perfOrmed The RobUsT staBiliTy test as descriBEd in [@alcubierre03d]. For this test One taKeS minkOWsKi iniTial datA AnD ADds RaNdOm nOiSE wIth a sMalL amplitUde to all dyNamIcAl variables. FOR tHe evolutioN we Have used both HarMonic sLiCinG With $f=1$ And StandArd 1+log SLicing With $f=2/\alphA$.
FOR the siMUlationS DIsCussEd below we used 1,000 grid POiNTs, a grid spacing Of $\DeltA r = 0.001$ ANd A TIme SteP $\Delta t = \DelTa R/2$. FurtHErmore, wE HaVE DEmaNDed periodic boUndary condiTIonS and haVe Set ALl $1/r$ and $1/R^2$ termS tO ZerO by hand (i.e. we Are pErforming The run “AT infiniTY”). SettinG these TerMs tO zerO ShOuLd hAvE No iMPoRtaNT efFect on thE pReSence Of blOW-UPS sinCe oNe caN readIly verify that SucH terMS arE only LineaR in tHe EigenFields. moreoVeR, one could easily ReguLarize the EquAtIonS aT the oRIgin by FolLowIng the pRocedurE DesCrIBED iN [@Alcubierre04a], but doiNg SO WoUld only oBscure THe StUDy of blow-UpS by MixiNG Them wIth pUReLy geometRic effECtS.
WE start tHe SimulaTiOns WitH MinkOWski InitiaL data pluS randOM noise of order $10^{-6}$ oN All evolution vARiABLeS. at laTteR times we comPute THe erRor $\dELtA$ as THe aveRage aBsOLuTE value over the grid of ThE quantIty $(\suM_{i=1}^3 |u_i - 1| + \sum_{i=1}^5
|v_i|)/8$.
We fIrst perforMED Runs for tHe ADm SySTem without addiNg conStraints, anD Observed The weLl known gRowth in thE AVerage erRor CauSed By tHE FaCt that ADM is onLY WeakLy HyperboLic. next, we iMplEmeNteD thE $\mU$-family giVen by (\[eq:hkBMu\]) AnD (\[eQ:soUrcehk\]), Which accOrDinG tO thE sourCE criteRia is ShocK-aVoIDinG. Figure \[FIg:MU\] ShowS tHe BehaVioR oF the aVeraGE erRor for tHis family. in tHE top PaNeL we plot The growth of thE eRror for the CaSe oF harmoNIC slicing As a function of time (measurED in unitS of The liGht-cRossing tiMe oF our coMpuTAtionaL grid), fOr sevErAl dIFFerenT VAlUes Of $|\Mu|$. We see thaT FOr AdM (whiCh Is noT a membeR of the $\mu$-family), and fOR thE cases with $\mu=0$ aNd $|\mU| = 1$, the ERRoR grOWs LIneArLY wiTH Time, while for $|\mu| = 1 | a first numerical experim ent we hav e per for med t he r obus t stability te s t as described in [@Alcubi erre0 3d ] . Fo r t his t est one ta k e s M in ko wsk ii ni tialdat a and a dds random no is e with a sma l lamplitudetoall dynamica l v ariabl es . F o r the ev oluti on weh ave us ed both h ar m onic s l icing w i t h$f=1 $ and standard 1+ l og slicing with $ f=2/\a lp h a$ .
Fo r t he simulat io ns di s cussedb el o w weu sed 1,000 gri d points, a gri d spac in g o f $\Del ta r=0 .00 1$ and a ti me s tep $\Del ta t = \Deltar /2$. Fu rtherm ore , w e ha v ede man de d pe r io dic bou ndary co nd it ionsandh a v e set al l $1 /r$ a nd $1/r^2$ te rms toz ero by h and ( i.e. w e are perfo rming t he run “at infi nity ”). Setti ngth ese t ermst o zero sh oul d haveno impo r tan te f f ec t on the presenceof b lo w-ups si nce on e c an readilyve rif y th a t such ter m sare only linea r i nthe eig en fields .Mor eov er, o n e co uld ea sily reg ulari z e the equation s at the origi n b y fo l lowi ngthe procedu re d e scri bedi n[@A l cubie rre04 a] , b u t doing so would on ly obscu re th e study of bl ow-ups bym i x ing them wit h p u rely geometric effe cts.
We s t art thesimul ations w ith Minko w s ki initi aldat a p lus r an dom noise ofo r der$1 0^{-6}$ on all ev olu tio n v ari ab les. At l atter ti me swe c omp ute t h e error$\ del ta $ a s the averag e abs olut eva l ueover th e g r i d of t he qua nti ty $(\s um_{ i =1} ^3 |u_i - 1| + \ sum _ {i=1 }^ 5|v_i|)/ 8$.
We first p erformed r un s f or the A DM syste m without adding constr a ints, a ndobser vedthe wellkno wn gro wth in the avera ge er ro r c a u sed b y th e f ac t that ADM i s o nly w ea klyhyperbo lic. Next, we impl e men ted the $\mu$ -fa mily g iv enb y( \[e q: h KBm u \ ]) and (\[eq:so urcehK\]), w h ic h accordin g to t he sour ce crit eriai s shock -avoiding . Figure\[ fig: m u \]shows thebehavior of the a v erage er ror f orthis f am ily . Inthe to p pa nel w e plot t he gro wth o fthe erro r for the case of harmo nic sl icing as a functi ono f t ime (meas ured in unitsofthe ligh t-c r ossin g ti m eofo ur co mput a tional gr i d) , f o r s everal diff e r e ntvalue s o f $|\mu |$.We see that for A D M (which is no t am e mbe r o f the $ \mu$-family),and f o r the cas es with $\mu= 0$ and $ |\ m u| =1$, th e erro r grows l in e arly w ithtim e, whilefor $ | \mu| =1 | a_first numerical_experiment we have performed_the robust_stability_test as_described_in [@Alcubierre03d]. For this_test one takes_Minkowski initial data and_adds random noise_with_a small amplitude to all dynamical variables. For the evolution we have used both_harmonic_slicing with_$f=1$_and_standard 1+log slicing with $f=2/\alpha$.
For_the simulations discussed below we_used 1,000_grid points, a grid spacing of $\Delta r_=_0.001$ and a_time step $\Delta t = \Delta r/2$. Furthermore, we_have demanded periodic boundary conditions and_have set all_$1/r$_and_$1/r^2$ terms to zero_by hand (i.e. we are performing_the run “at infinity”). Setting these_terms to zero should have no important_effect on the presence of blow-ups_since one can readily verify_that such_terms are only linear in_the eigenfields. Moreover,_one could_easily regularize the_equations at the origin by following_the procedure described_in [@Alcubierre04a], but doing so would only_obscure_the study of_blow-ups_by_mixing them_with purely geometric_effects.
We_start the_simulations_with Minkowski initial data plus random_noise_of order $10^{-6}$ on all evolution variables._At latter times we_compute_the error $\delta$ as_the average absolute value over_the grid of the quantity $(\sum_{i=1}^3_|u_i -_1| +_\sum_{i=1}^5
|v_i|)/8$.
We first performed runs for the ADM system without adding constraints,_and observed the well known growth_in the average error_caused by_the_fact that ADM_is_only weakly_hyperbolic. Next, we implemented the $\mu$-family given_by (\[eq:hKBmu\])_and (\[eq:sourcehK\]), which according to the_source criteria is shock-avoiding._Figure \[fig:mu\]_shows the behavior of the average_error for this family. In the_top panel we plot the_growth_of_the error for the case_of harmonic slicing as a function_of time (measured_in units of the light-crossing time of_our_computational grid), for several different values_of_$|\mu|$. We see that for ADM_(which_is_not a member of the_$\mu$-family), and for the cases with_$\mu=0$ and $|\mu| = 1$, the error grows linearly_with time, while_for $|\mu| = 1 |
${\mathbf{GrVect}}$ is the category of ${\mathbb{N}}_0$-graded vector spaces over ${\mathbbm{k}}$. Most of the content of this section generalises to the graded case in a completely straightforward way, so to avoid too much duplication, we only state it for the ungraded case.
To be able to extract any sort of useful information from persistence modules, we need to understand their structure. One way of doing this is by decomposing them into indecomposable summands. The indecomposables relevant in our case are known as interval modules.
A persistence module $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is [*indecomposable*]{} if $M\cong M_1\oplus M_2$ implies that either $M_1\cong 0$ or $M_2\cong 0$.
Let $J\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}$ be an interval. The [*interval module*]{} ${\mathbbm{k}}J\colon ({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is defined as $${\mathbbm{k}}J(x)=\begin{cases}
{\mathbbm{k}};&\text{if $x\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise,}
\end{cases}$$ and $${\mathbbm{k}}J(x\leq y)=\begin{cases}
{\operatorname{id}}_{{\mathbbm{k}}};&\text{if $x,y\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise.}
\end{cases}$$
One of the main features of persistence modules over $({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$ that makes them useful in TDA is that they can frequently be decomposed as direct sums of interval modules. When such a decomposition exists, it is unique [@azumaya1950corrections]. The following version of the decomposition theorem is originally due to Crawley-Boevey [@crawley2015decomposition]. In the case of persistence modules over $({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$, it can be stated as follows.
Suppose $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is a persistence module such that $M(x)$ is finite dimensional for every $x\in{\mathbb{R}}$. Then $M$ has a decomposition into interval modules.
Whenever a persistence module $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ decomposes | $ { \mathbf{GrVect}}$ is the category of $ { \mathbb{N}}_0$-graded vector spaces over $ { \mathbbm{k}}$. Most of the content of this section popularize to the grade case in a completely straightforward means, so to avoid besides much duplicate, we only state it for the ungraded case.
To be able to extract any kind of useful information from persistence modules, we necessitate to understand their structure. One way of doing this is by decomposing them into indecomposable summands. The indecomposables relevant in our event are known as interval modules.
A perseverance module $ M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is [ * indecomposable * ] { } if $ M\cong M_1\oplus M_2 $ implies that either $ M_1\cong 0 $ or $ M_2\cong 0$.
Let $ J\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}$ be an time interval. The [ * interval faculty * ] { } $ { \mathbbm{k}}J\colon ({ \mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is defined as $ $ { \mathbbm{k}}J(x)=\begin{cases }
{ \mathbbm{k}};&\text{if $ x\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise, }
\end{cases}$$ and $ $ { \mathbbm{k}}J(x\leq y)=\begin{cases }
{ \operatorname{id}}_{{\mathbbm{k}}};&\text{if $ x, y\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise. }
\end{cases}$$
One of the main features of persistence module over $ ({ \mathbb{R}},\leq)$ that makes them useful in TDA is that they can frequently be decomposed as direct sums of time interval faculty. When such a decomposition exists, it is unique [ @azumaya1950corrections ]. The following version of the decomposition theorem is originally due to Crawley - Boevey [ @crawley2015decomposition ]. In the case of continuity modules over $ ({ \mathbb{R}},\leq)$, it can be stated as stick to.
presuppose $ M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is a persistence module such that $ M(x)$ is finite dimensional for every $ x\in{\mathbb{R}}$. Then $ M$ has a decay into interval module.
Whenever a persistence module $ M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ decomposes | ${\mahhbf{GrVect}}$ is the categovy of ${\mathbb{N}}_0$-grabwd vecvor spades over ${\mathbbm{k}}$. Most of the contenv of this section generalises tu the grafed case in e completely strejghtforward wzn, so co avoid too mucm duplicatimn, we only stade ic for the ungraded case.
To be able to extracy wny sort of usgful pnsormzniin from persistence modules, ws need uo understand theit structure. One way of doijg tjis is by decomposlng them injk igeecomposable summands. Uhz indecompoaables relevant in our case are knowu as intervql mofoles.
A persisvence iodule $M\colok({\kathbb{S}},\leq)\to{\msthbf{Vect}}$ is [*ikdecokpowable*]{} if $M\cong M_1\oplus M_2$ implies that eijher $M_1\cong 0$ kr $M_2\cong 0$.
Let $J\subwereq{\majhbb{R}}$ be xb ivtedvel. Fhe [*inhertal module*]{} ${\jathbbm{k}}J\cooon ({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\matnbs{Nrct}}$ is definsd as $${\iaehbbm{k}}J(x)=\begin{cases}
{\mathbbm{k}};&\text{if $x\in J$,}\\
0;&\ttxt{otgerwise,}
\end{cases}$$ and $${\matybbm{k}}J(x\leq y)=\begin{cased}
{\operatorgame{id}}_{{\mathbbm{k}}};&\text{if $x,y\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise.}
\end{cases}$$
Ote of ghe mwkb veatures of persistence modules over $({\mathbb{R}},\lqs)$ uhan makes them usefml in TDA is that yhfy san frequentli be deekmlosed as direct suls of igtervql modulef. Whrn such a decomposition exiwts, it is unpque [@azumaya1950correctiond]. The follocing vgrsion of the decomposition tkeorem is originaply due tk Crawley-Boevey [@cfawkef2015decomposition]. In the case of persiwtenee modulds ofer $({\maehbb{R}},\leq)$, ih can be stated as folloas.
Supkose $M\wolon({\mathbh{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is a persisteire module sucn dhan $M(x)$ is fnnite cimensional fjr every $x\in{\majhbb{R}}$. Theu $M$ har a decompksition into interdal modules.
Whajever a persmstence mjdulw $M\cilon({\matfcb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Fect}}$ decomposes | ${\mathbf{GrVect}}$ is the category of ${\mathbb{N}}_0$-graded vector ${\mathbbm{k}}$. of the of this section in completely straightforward way, to avoid too duplication, we only state it for ungraded case. To be able to extract any sort of useful information from modules, we need to understand their structure. One way of doing this is decomposing into summands. indecomposables relevant in our case are known as interval modules. A persistence module $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is [*indecomposable*]{} $M\cong M_1\oplus M_2$ implies that either $M_1\cong 0$ $M_2\cong 0$. Let $J\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}$ an interval. The [*interval module*]{} ({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ defined as {\mathbbm{k}};&\text{if J$,}\\ \end{cases}$$ and $${\mathbbm{k}}J(x\leq {\operatorname{id}}_{{\mathbbm{k}}};&\text{if $x,y\in J$,}\\ 0;&\text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$ One of the main features of persistence modules over $({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$ that makes useful in that they frequently decomposed direct sums of When such a decomposition exists, it The following version of the decomposition theorem is due to [@crawley2015decomposition]. In the case of persistence over $({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$, it can be stated as follows. $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is a persistence module such that $M(x)$ is finite dimensional for every $x\in{\mathbb{R}}$. Then a decomposition into interval Whenever a persistence $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ | ${\mathbf{GrVect}}$ is the category Of ${\mathbb{N}}_0$-gRaded VecTor SpAces Over ${\Mathbbm{k}}$. Most of THe coNtent of this section geneRalisEs TO the GRaDed caSe in a coMPlETEly StRaIghTfORwArd waY, so To avoid Too much dupLicAtIon, we only staTE iT for the ungRadEd case.
To be abLe tO extraCt Any SOrt of UseFul inFormatIOn from PersistenCe MOdules, WE need to UNDeRstaNd their structure. ONE wAY of doing this is By decoMpOSiNG TheM inTo indecompOsAble sUMmands. THE iNDEComPOsables relevaNt in our case ARe kNown as InTerVAl moduLes.
A pErSIstEnce module $M\ColoN({\mathbb{R}},\lEq)\to{\maTHbf{Vect}}$ IS [*indecoMposabLe*]{} iF $M\cOng M_1\OPlUs m_2$ imPlIEs tHAt EitHEr $M_1\Cong 0$ or $M_2\cOnG 0$.
LEt $J\suBsetEQ{\MAThbb{r}}$ be An inTervaL. The [*interval mOduLe*]{} ${\maTHbbM{k}}J\coLon ({\maThbb{r}},\lEq)\to{\mAthbf{VEct}}$ is DeFined as $${\mathbbm{k}}j(x)=\beGin{cases}
{\mAthBbM{k}};&\tExT{if $x\iN j$,}\\
0;&\text{oTheRwiSe,}
\end{caSes}$$ and $${\mAThbBm{K}}j(X\LeQ y)=\begin{cases}
{\operatOrNAMe{Id}}_{{\mathbbM{k}}};&\text{IF $x,Y\iN j$,}\\
0;&\text{othErWisE.}
\end{CASes}$$
OnE of tHE mAin featuRes of pERsIsTence moDuLes oveR $({\mAthBb{R}},\Leq)$ thAT makEs them Useful in tDA is THat they can freqUEntly be decompOSeD AS dIRect SumS of interval ModuLEs. WhEn suCH a DecOMposiTion eXiSTs, IT is unique [@azumaya1950corReCtions]. the foLlowing versioN of the decoMPOSition thEoreM Is ORiginally due to crawlEy-Boevey [@crAWley2015decoMposiTion]. In thE case of peRSIstence mOduLes OveR $({\maTHBb{r}},\leq)$, it can be stATEd as FoLlows.
SuPpoSe $M\coloN({\maThbB{R}},\lEq)\tO{\mAthbf{Vect}}$ Is a persiStEnCe MoDulE such THat $M(x)$ is fInIte DiMenSionaL For eveRy $x\in{\MathBb{r}}$. THEn $M$ Has a decOMpOSItioN iNtO intErvAl ModulEs.
WhENevEr a persIstence moDulE $m\colOn({\MaThbb{R}},\leQ)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ DeComposes | ${\mathbf{GrVect}}$ is th e category of $ {\m ath bb {N}} _0$- graded vectors pace s over ${\mathbbm{k}}$ . Mos to f th e c onten t of th i ss e cti on g ene ra l is es to th e grade d case ina c om pletely stra i gh tforward w ay, so to avoid to o much d upl i catio n,we on ly sta t e it f or the un gr a ded ca s e.
Tob e a bleto extract any so r to f useful infor mation f r om p ers ist ence modul es , wen eed tou nd e r s tan d their struct ure. One wa y of doing t his is bydecom po s ing them intoinde composabl e summ a nds. Th e indeco mposab les re leva n tin ou rc ase ar e k n own as inte rv al modu les. A pers ist ence modu le $M\colon({ \ma thbb { R}} ,\leq )\to{ \mat hb f{Vec t}}$ i s [*i nd ecomposable*]{} if$M\cong M _1\ op lus M _2$ i m pliestha t e ither $ M_1\con g 0$ o r $ M_ 2\cong 0$.
Let $J \s u b se teq{\mat hbb{R} } $be an inter va l.The[ * inter valm od ule*]{}${\mat h bb m{ k}}J\co lo n ({\m at hbb {R} },\le q )\to {\math bf{Vect} }$ is defined as $${ \ mathbbm{k}}J( x )= \ b eg i n{ca ses }
{\mathbbm {k}} ; &\te xt{i f $ x\i n J$,} \\
0; &\ t ex t {otherwise,}
\end{c as es}$$and $ ${\mathbbm{k} }J(x\leq y ) = \ begin{ca ses} {\ o peratorname{id }}_{{ \mathbbm{k } }};&\tex t{if$x,y\inJ$,}\\
0; & \ text{oth erw ise .}\en d { ca ses}$$
One o f thema in feat ure s of pe rsi ste nce mo du les over$({\math bb {R }} ,\ leq )$ th a t makesth emus efu l inT DA isthatthey c an fre quently be d ecom po se d as di re ct su ms o f in tervalmodules.Whe n suc hadecompo sition exists ,it is uniq ue [@ azumay a 1 950corre ctions]. The followingv ersionofthe d ecom positionthe orem i s o r iginal ly due to C ra wle y - Boeve y [@ cra wl ey2015deco m p osi tion] .In t he case of persistence mo d ule s over $({\ma thb b{R} } , \l eq) $ ,i t c an bes t ated as follows .
Suppose $ M \c olon({\mat h bb{ R} },\leq) \to{\ma thbf{ V ect}}$is a pers istence m od ules u chthat $M(x) $ is fin ite dimen s ional fo r eve ry$x\in{ \m ath bb{R} }$. Th e n $ M$ ha s a de co mposit ion i nt o interv al modules.
Whenever a persi stenc e m odule $M\ col o n({ \mathbb{R }},\ leq)\to{\m ath bf{ Vect} }$d ecomp oses | ${\mathbf{GrVect}}$_is the_category of ${\mathbb{N}}_0$-graded vector_spaces over_${\mathbbm{k}}$._Most of_the_content of this_section generalises to_the graded case in_a completely straightforward_way,_so to avoid too much duplication, we only state it for the ungraded case.
To_be_able to_extract_any_sort of useful information from_persistence modules, we need to_understand their_structure. One way of doing this is by_decomposing_them into indecomposable_summands. The indecomposables relevant in our case are known_as interval modules.
A persistence module $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$_is [*indecomposable*]{} if_$M\cong_M_1\oplus_M_2$ implies that either_$M_1\cong 0$ or $M_2\cong 0$.
Let $J\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}$_be an interval. The [*interval module*]{}_${\mathbbm{k}}J\colon ({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is defined as $${\mathbbm{k}}J(x)=\begin{cases}
{\mathbbm{k}};&\text{if $x\in_J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise,}
\end{cases}$$ and $${\mathbbm{k}}J(x\leq y)=\begin{cases}
{\operatorname{id}}_{{\mathbbm{k}}};&\text{if $x,y\in J$,}\\
0;&\text{otherwise.}
\end{cases}$$
One_of the main features of_persistence modules_over $({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$ that makes them_useful in TDA_is that_they can frequently_be decomposed as direct sums of_interval modules. When_such a decomposition exists, it is_unique_[@azumaya1950corrections]. The following_version_of_the decomposition_theorem is originally_due_to Crawley-Boevey_[@crawley2015decomposition]._In the case of persistence modules_over_$({\mathbb{R}},\leq)$, it can be stated as follows.
Suppose_$M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ is a persistence_module_such that $M(x)$ is_finite dimensional for every $x\in{\mathbb{R}}$._Then $M$ has a decomposition into_interval modules.
Whenever_a persistence_module $M\colon({\mathbb{R}},\leq)\to{\mathbf{Vect}}$ decomposes |
mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} = \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ holds by considering the orthogonality of the eigenvector matrix $\breve{\mathbf{C}}$, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{I} = \breve{\mathbf{C}}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}.\end{aligned}$$ This implies that subsystem and environment eigenvectors are orthogonal, leading to the expression, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{0}
&= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{E}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{S}\\
&= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \\
&= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-\mathsf{T}} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} \\
&= \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aligned}$$ from which Eq. immediately follows.
Representation of the block-diagonalization matrix $\mathbf{Q}$ {#app:q}
===============================================================
In the literature,[@Cederbaum89; @Sikkema09; @Peng12; @Seino12] there exist multiple representations of the block-diagonalization matrix $\mathbf{Q}$. These representations are very similar to the expression in Eq. and it is trivial to show that they achieve the exact same block-diagonalization. The different representations arise from the following different definitions:
1. The definition of the block-diagonalization as either $$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{\mathbf{F}} = \mathbf{Q} \mathbf{F} \mathbf{Q}^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ or $$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{\mathbf{F}} = \ | mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1 } = \left (\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12 } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1 } \right)^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ holds by considering the orthogonality of the eigenvector matrix $ \breve{\mathbf{C}}$, $ $ \begin{aligned }
\mathbf{I } = \breve{\mathbf{C}}^\mathsf{T } \breve{\mathbf{C}}.\end{aligned}$$ This implies that subsystem and environment eigenvectors are orthogonal, lead to the formula, $ $ \begin{aligned }
\mathbf{0 }
& = \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{E}^\mathsf{T } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{S}\\
& = \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11 } + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^\mathsf{T } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21 } \\
& = \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-\mathsf{T } } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T } + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21 } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1 } \\
& = \left (\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12 } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1 } \right)^\mathsf{T } + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21 } \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aligned}$$ from which Eq. immediately follows.
Representation of the block - diagonalization matrix $ \mathbf{Q}$ { # app: q }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In the literature,[@Cederbaum89; @Sikkema09; @Peng12; @Seino12 ] there exist multiple representations of the engine block - diagonalization matrix $ \mathbf{Q}$. These representations are very similar to the construction in Eq. and it is superficial to show that they achieve the accurate like block - diagonalization. The different representation arise from the following different definitions:
1. The definition of the block - diagonalization as either $ $ \begin{aligned }
\tilde{\mathbf{F } } = \mathbf{Q } \mathbf{F } \mathbf{Q}^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ or $ $ \begin{aligned }
\tilde{\mathbf{F } } = \ | matjbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} = \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \nreve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \rigkr)^\mathsh{T},\end{aljgned}$$ houds by considering the orthojonaoity if the eigenvector matfix $\breve{\lathbf{C}}$, $$\vegii{aligned}
\mathbf{I} = \breve{\mabkbf{C}}^\mzbhsf{T} \ureve{\mathbf{C}}.\end{sligned}$$ Thhs implies thad ruysystem and environment eigenvectors are oryhlgonal, leading to uhe expdvswion, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{0}
&= \brevs{\mathbf{B}}_\mathcal{E}^\mathsf{T} \nreve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{S}\\
&= \breve{\lathhf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mahhbf{C}}_{11} + \brevg{\jatrvf{C}}_{22}^\mathsf{T} \bfeve{\mathbf{B}}_{21} \\
&= \breve{\matgbf{C}}_{22}^{-\mathsf{T}} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} + \brere{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \btzce{\mwjhbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} \\
&= \left( \ureve{\mwthbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \sight)^\mayhsf{T} + \breve{\mabhbf{C}}_{21} \brwve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aligned}$$ hrom which Eq. immediwtely folnocs.
Representation of tye blocn-diaconauuzagioh kafrix $\mwthuf{Q}$ {#app:q}
===============================================================
In fhe literatyre,[@Cederbaum89; @Sikkems09; @[vmg12; @Seino12] thede exift multiple representations of the block-dpagohalization matrix $\mathbd{Q}$. These representatilns are vqry similar to the expression in Eq. and it is trieial vo shiw gyah they achieve the exact same block-diagonalizwfipn. The different representayilnx arise from tfe followjng different defijitions:
1. The definitijn og the block-diagonalization qs either $$\beyin{qligned}
\tilde{\machbf{F}} = \mathby{Q} \matnbf{F} \kathbf{Q}^\mathsf{T},\end{aligneb}$$ or $$\bsgin{aligned}
\tilde{\jxthbf{F}} = \ | mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} = \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ holds the of the matrix $\breve{\mathbf{C}}$, $$\begin{aligned} implies subsystem and environment are orthogonal, leading the expression, $$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{0} &= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{E}^\mathsf{T} &= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \\ &= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-\mathsf{T}} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} &= \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aligned}$$ from which Eq. immediately follows. of block-diagonalization $\mathbf{Q}$ =============================================================== In the literature,[@Cederbaum89; @Sikkema09; @Peng12; @Seino12] there exist multiple representations of the block-diagonalization matrix $\mathbf{Q}$. representations are very similar to the expression in and it is trivial show that they achieve the same The different arise the different definitions: 1. definition of the block-diagonalization as either $$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\mathbf{F}} = \mathbf{Q} \mathbf{F} \mathbf{Q}^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ or $$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\mathbf{F}} = \ | mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} = \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \brEve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \Right)^\MatHsf{t},\eNd{alIgneD}$$ holds by considERing The orthogonality of the eIgenvEcTOr maTRiX $\brevE{\mathbf{c}}$, $$\BeGIN{alIgNeD}
\maThBF{I} = \Breve{\MatHbf{C}}^\matHsf{T} \breve{\mAthBf{c}}.\end{aligned}$$ THIs Implies thaT suBsystem and enVirOnment EiGenVEctorS arE orthOgonal, LEading To the exprEsSIon, $$\begIN{aligneD}
\MAtHbf{0}
&= \bReve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcaL{e}^\mAThsf{T} \breve{\mathBf{C}}_\matHcAL{S}\\
&= \BREve{\MatHbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{t} \bReve{\mAThbf{C}}_{11} + \brEVe{\MATHbf{c}}_{22}^\Mathsf{T} \breve{\mAthbf{C}}_{21} \\
&= \breve{\MAthBf{C}}_{22}^{-\matHsF{T}} \bREve{\matHbf{C}}_{12}^\mAtHSf{T} + \Breve{\mathbf{c}}_{21} \breVe{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} \\
&= \Left( \brEVe{\mathbF{c}}_{12} \breve{\mAthbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \RigHt)^\mAthsF{t} + \bReVe{\mAtHBf{C}}_{21} \BReVe{\mAThbF{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aliGnEd}$$ From wHich eQ. IMMediAteLy foLlows.
representatioN of The bLOck-DiagoNalizAtioN mAtrix $\Mathbf{q}$ {#app:q}
===============================================================
in The literature,[@CeDerbAum89; @SikkemA09; @PeNg12; @seiNo12] There EXist muLtiPle RepreseNtationS Of tHe BLOCk-Diagonalization matRiX $\MAtHbf{Q}$. ThesE repreSEnTaTIons are vErY siMilaR TO the eXpreSSiOn in Eq. anD it is tRIvIaL to show ThAt they AcHieVe tHe exaCT samE block-DiagonalIzatiON. The different rEPresentations ARiSE FrOM the FolLowing diffeRent DEfinItioNS:
1. THe dEFinitIon of ThE BlOCk-diagonalization as EiTher $$\beGin{alIgned}
\tilde{\matHbf{F}} = \mathbf{q} \MAThbf{F} \matHbf{Q}^\MAtHSf{T},\end{aligned}$$ oR $$\begiN{aligned}
\tiLDe{\mathbf{f}} = \ | mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} = \le ft( \breve {\mat hbf {C} }_ {12} \br eve{\mathbf{C} } _{22 }^{-1} \right)^\mathsf {T},\ en d {ali g ne d}$$holds b y c o n sid er in g t he or thogo nal ity ofthe eigenv ect or matrix $\br e ve {\mathbf{C }}$ , $$\begin{a lig ned}
\ ma thb f {I} = \b reve{ \mathb f {C}}^\ mathsf{T} \ b reve{\ m athbf{C } } .\ end{ aligned}$$ This i m pl i es that subsys tem an de nv i r onm ent eigenvect or s are orthogo n al , l ead i ng to the exp ression, $$ \ beg in{ali gn ed} \mathb f{0}
& = \b reve{\mathb f{C} }_\mathca l{E}^\ m athsf{T } \breve {\math bf{ C}} _\ma t hc al {S} \\ &=\ br eve { \ma thbf{C}} _{ 12 }^\ma thsf { T } \bre ve{ \mat hbf{C }}_{11} + \br eve {\ma t hbf {C}}_ {22}^ \mat hs f{T}\breve {\mat hb f{C}}_{21} \\
& = \b reve{\mat hbf {C }}_ {2 2}^{- \ mathsf {T} } \ breve{\ mathbf{ C }}_ {1 2 } ^ \m athsf{T} + \breve{ \m a t hb f{C}}_{2 1} \br e ve {\ m athbf{C} }_ {11 }^{- 1 } \\
& = \l e ft ( \breve {\math b f{ C} }_{12}\b reve{\ ma thb f{C }}_{2 2 }^{- 1} \ri ght)^\ma thsf{ T } + \breve{\ma t hbf{C}}_{21}\ br e v e{ \ math bf{ C}}_{11}^{- 1},\ e nd{a lign e d} $$f rom w hichEq . i mmediately follows.
Repres entat ion of the bl ock-diagon a l i zation m atri x $ \ mathbf{Q}$ {#a pp:q}
========= = ======== ===== ======== ========= = = ======== === === === === =
I n the literat u r e,[@ Ce derbaum 89; @Sikke ma0 9;@Pe ng1 2; @Seino12 ] thereex is tmu lti ple r e presenta ti ons o f t he bl o ck-dia gonal izat io nm atr ix $\ma t hb f { Q}$. T he se r epr es entat ions are very s imilar to th e exp re ss ion inEq. and it i strivial to s how thatt h ey achie ve the exact same block - diagona liz ation . Th e differe ntrepres ent a tionsarisefromth e f o l lowin g di ffe re nt definit i o ns:
1. T he d efiniti on of the block-di a gon alization aseit her$ $ \b egi n {a l ign ed }
\tilde{\mathbf{ F}} = \mat hb f {Q } \mathbf{ F } \ ma thbf{Q} ^\maths f{T}, \ end{ali gned}$$ o r $$\begi n{ alig n e d} \tilde {\mathbf {F}} = \ | mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} =_\left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}_\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1} \right)^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ holds by_considering the_orthogonality_of the_eigenvector_matrix $\breve{\mathbf{C}}$, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{I}_= \breve{\mathbf{C}}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}.\end{aligned}$$_This implies that subsystem_and environment eigenvectors_are_orthogonal, leading to the expression, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{0}
&= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{E}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_\mathcal{S}\\
&= \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^\mathsf{T} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21}_\\
&=_\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-\mathsf{T}} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12}^\mathsf{T}_+_\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21}_\breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1} \\
&= \left( \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{12} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{22}^{-1}_\right)^\mathsf{T} + \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{21} \breve{\mathbf{C}}_{11}^{-1},\end{aligned}$$ from_which Eq. _immediately follows.
Representation of the block-diagonalization matrix $\mathbf{Q}$ {#app:q}
===============================================================
In_the_literature,[@Cederbaum89; @Sikkema09; @Peng12;_@Seino12] there exist multiple representations of the block-diagonalization matrix_$\mathbf{Q}$. These representations are very similar_to the expression_in_Eq. _and it is trivial_to show that they achieve the_exact same block-diagonalization. The different representations_arise from the following different definitions:
1. _The definition of the block-diagonalization as_either $$\begin{aligned}
_\tilde{\mathbf{F}} =_\mathbf{Q} \mathbf{F} \mathbf{Q}^\mathsf{T},\end{aligned}$$ or $$\begin{aligned}
_ _\tilde{\mathbf{F}} =_\ |
nu}{eV}})$ in the differential conductance when the edge was coupled to one vortex (Eq. ). This can be generalized if the chiral Majoranas have single-point couplings to several vortices. In that case $\phi$ is replaced by $\sum_i \phi_i - \sum_j \phi_j$, where $\phi_i = \arctan({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$ comes from vortex-edge-coupling with the upper edge and $\phi_j$ from coupling with the lower edge. Hence, multiple phase crossovers will occur if several vortices are located close to the edge.
One Majorana Coupled to Both Edges {#sec:CouplingBothEdges}
----------------------------------
Another generalization is to study point-couplings to both the lower and the upper arm, in which case the coupling term in the Lagrangian is $ \pazocal{L}_{\mathrm{bulk}-\mathrm{edge}} = 2 i \lambda_1 \xi_1(x=0) \xi_0 + 2 i \lambda_2 \xi_2(x=0)\xi_0$. The corresponding equations of motion are $$\begin{aligned}
2\partial_t \xi_0 &= \lambda_1\left[ \xi_{1R} + \xi_{1L} \right] + \lambda_2\left[ \xi_{2R} + \xi_{2L} \right], \\
v_m \xi_{1R} &= v_m \xi_{1L} + \lambda_1 \xi_0, \\
v_m \xi_{2R} &= v_m \xi_{2L} + \lambda_2 \xi_0.
\label{eq:EquationsOfMotion}\end{aligned}$$ Here, we again use the notation $\xi_{1R} = \xi_1(x=0^+)$, $\xi_{2R} = \xi_2(x=0^+)$, $\xi_{1L} = \xi_1(x=0^-)$, and $\xi_{2L} = \xi_2(x=0^-)$. In frequency space we find a relation between $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ across the coupling points, $[\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}]_R^T = U(\omega)[\xi_{1}, \xi | nu}{eV}})$ in the differential conductance when the edge was coupled to one vortex (Eq .). This can be generalized if the chiral Majoranas get individual - point couplings to several whirlpool. In that case $ \phi$ is replaced by $ \sum_i \phi_i - \sum_j \phi_j$, where $ \phi_i = \arctan({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$ come from vortex - edge - yoke with the upper boundary and $ \phi_j$ from coupling with the lower boundary. Hence, multiple phase crossovers will happen if several vortices are located close to the edge.
One Majorana Coupled to Both Edges { # sec: CouplingBothEdges }
----------------------------------
Another abstraction is to study point - couplings to both the low and the upper arm, in which case the yoke term in the Lagrangian is $ \pazocal{L}_{\mathrm{bulk}-\mathrm{edge } } = 2 i \lambda_1 \xi_1(x=0) \xi_0 + 2 i \lambda_2 \xi_2(x=0)\xi_0$. The equate equations of movement are $ $ \begin{aligned }
2\partial_t \xi_0 & = \lambda_1\left [ \xi_{1R } + \xi_{1L } \right ] + \lambda_2\left [ \xi_{2R } + \xi_{2L } \right ], \\
v_m \xi_{1R } & = v_m \xi_{1L } + \lambda_1 \xi_0, \\
v_m \xi_{2R } & = v_m \xi_{2L } + \lambda_2 \xi_0.
\label{eq: EquationsOfMotion}\end{aligned}$$ Here, we again use the notation $ \xi_{1R } = \xi_1(x=0^+)$, $ \xi_{2R } = \xi_2(x=0^+)$, $ \xi_{1L } = \xi_1(x=0 ^ -)$, and $ \xi_{2L } = \xi_2(x=0 ^ -)$. In frequency space we determine a relation between $ \xi_1 $ and $ \xi_2 $ across the coupling points, $ [ \xi_{1 }, \xi_{2}]_R^T = U(\omega)[\xi_{1 }, \xi | nu}{eG}})$ in the differential cokductance when tkw edge was ckupled tu one vortex (Eq. ). This can be gwneraoized if the chiral Magoranas hwve singoe-pomnt couplings to several vortidcs. In vhat case $\phi$ ix replaced by $\sum_i \phi_i - \sjm_l \phi_j$, where $\phi_i = \arctan({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$ cjmes frpm vortex-edge-coukling rith nht upper edge and $\phi_j$ from couplihg with the lower edbe. Hence, multiple phase crlssogers will occur if several votficqw are locatea close to the edge.
One Majorana Coupled to Both Edges {#sec:CpuplingBotyEeged}
----------------------------------
Dnother genxralizwtion is to study pohnt-coupkings to both bhe lmwee and the upper arm, ii which case the coukling term iu the Lagrangian is $ \pazocal{N}_{\matvrm{bjok}-\mxthdm{xdgs}} = 2 i \pamuda_1 \xi_1(x=0) \xi_0 + 2 i \lambda_2 \zi_2(x=0)\xi_0$. The corresponcigt equations or motijn are $$\begin{aligned}
2\partial_t \xi_0 &= \lambda_1\lefu[ \xi_{1R} + \xi_{1L} \right] + \lambda_2\lefr[ \xi_{2R} + \xi_{2L} \right], \\
v_m \xl_{1R} &= v_m \xi_{1J} + \lambda_1 \xi_0, \\
v_m \xi_{2R} &= v_m \xi_{2L} + \lambda_2 \xi_0.
\label{eq:EquadionsKwMouiin}\end{xoihned}$$ Here, we again use the notation $\xi_{1R} = \xi_1(x=0^+)$, $\vj_{2R} = \qi_2(x=0^+)$, $\xi_{1L} = \xi_1(x=0^-)$, and $\wi_{2L} = \xi_2(x=0^-)$. In frequemcj xkace we find a relatnkn between $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ across the xoupling kointx, $[\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}]_R^T = U(\omega)[\xi_{1}, \xi | nu}{eV}})$ in the differential conductance when the coupled one vortex ). This can Majoranas single-point couplings to vortices. In that $\phi$ is replaced by $\sum_i \phi_i \sum_j \phi_j$, where $\phi_i = \arctan({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$ comes from vortex-edge-coupling with the upper edge $\phi_j$ from coupling with the lower edge. Hence, multiple phase crossovers will occur several are close the edge. One Majorana Coupled to Both Edges {#sec:CouplingBothEdges} ---------------------------------- Another generalization is to study point-couplings both the lower and the upper arm, in case the coupling term the Lagrangian is $ \pazocal{L}_{\mathrm{bulk}-\mathrm{edge}} 2 \lambda_1 \xi_1(x=0) + i \xi_2(x=0)\xi_0$. The corresponding of motion are $$\begin{aligned} 2\partial_t \xi_0 &= \lambda_1\left[ \xi_{1R} + \xi_{1L} \right] + \lambda_2\left[ \xi_{2R} + \xi_{2L} \\ v_m v_m \xi_{1L} \lambda_1 \\ \xi_{2R} &= v_m \lambda_2 \xi_0. \label{eq:EquationsOfMotion}\end{aligned}$$ Here, we again $\xi_{1R} = \xi_1(x=0^+)$, $\xi_{2R} = \xi_2(x=0^+)$, $\xi_{1L} = and $\xi_{2L} \xi_2(x=0^-)$. In frequency space we find relation between $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ across the coupling $[\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}]_R^T = U(\omega)[\xi_{1}, \xi | nu}{eV}})$ in the differential condUctance wheN the eDge Was CoUpleD to oNe vortex (Eq. ). This CAn be Generalized if the chiral majorAnAS havE SiNgle-pOint couPLiNGS to SeVeRal VoRTiCes. In ThaT case $\phI$ is replaceD by $\SuM_i \phi_i - \sum_j \phI_J$, wHere $\phi_i = \arCtaN({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$ coMes From voRtEx-eDGe-couPliNg witH the upPEr edge And $\phi_j$ frOm COuplinG With the LOWeR edgE. Hence, multiple phaSE cROssovers will ocCur if sEvERaL VOrtIceS are locateD cLose tO The edge.
oNe mAJOraNA Coupled to BotH Edges {#sec:CoUPliNgBothedGes}
----------------------------------
aNother GenerAlIZatIon is to studY poiNt-couplinGs to boTH the lowER and the Upper aRm, iN whIch cASe ThE coUpLIng TErM in THe LAgrangiaN iS $ \pAzocaL{L}_{\maTHRM{Bulk}-\MatHrm{eDge}} = 2 i \lAmbda_1 \xi_1(x=0) \xi_0 + 2 i \laMbdA_2 \xi_2(x=0)\XI_0$. ThE corrEsponDing EqUatioNs of moTion aRe $$\Begin{aligned}
2\parTial_T \xi_0 &= \lambda_1\LefT[ \xI_{1R} + \xI_{1L} \Right] + \LAmbda_2\lEft[ \Xi_{2R} + \Xi_{2L} \righT], \\
v_m \xi_{1R} &= v_M \Xi_{1L} + \LaMBDA_1 \xI_0, \\
v_m \xi_{2R} &= v_m \xi_{2L} + \lambda_2 \xI_0.
\lABEl{Eq:EquatiOnsOfMOTiOn}\ENd{aligneD}$$ HEre, We agAIN use tHe noTAtIon $\xi_{1R} = \xi_1(X=0^+)$, $\xi_{2R} = \xi_2(X=0^+)$, $\Xi_{1l} = \xI_1(x=0^-)$, and $\xi_{2l} = \xI_2(x=0^-)$. In frEqUenCy sPace wE Find A relatIon betweEn $\xi_1$ aND $\xi_2$ across the coUPling points, $[\xi_{1}, \XI_{2}]_R^t = u(\OmEGa)[\xi_{1}, \Xi | nu}{eV}})$ in the differen tial condu ctanc e w hen t he e dgewas coupled to onevortex (Eq. ). This ca n bege n eral i ze d ifthe chi r al M ajo ra na s h av e s ingle -po int cou plings tosev er al vortices. In that case $\ phi$ is repl ace d by $ \s um_ i \phi _i- \su m_j \p h i_j$,where $\p hi _ i = \a r ctan({\ f r ac {\nu _i}{eV}})$ comesf ro m vortex-edge-c ouplin gw it h the up per edge a nd $\ph i _j$ fro m c o u p lin g with the low er edge. He n ce, multi pl e p h ase cr ossov er s wi ll occur if sev eral vort ices a r e locat e d close to th e e dge .
O n eMa jor an a Co u pl edt o B oth Edge s{# sec:C oupl i n g B othE dge s}
- ----- ------------- --- ---- - --- ----
Anot herge neral izatio n isto study point-co upli ngs to bo thth e l ow er an d the u ppe r a rm, inwhich c a seth e c ou pling term in theLa g r an gian is$ \paz o ca l{ L }_{\math rm {bu lk}- \ m athrm {edg e }} = 2 i \ lambda _ 1\x i_1(x=0 )\xi_0+2 i \l ambda _ 2 \x i_2(x= 0)\xi_0$ . The correspondinge quations of m o ti o n a r e $$ \be gin{aligned }
2\ p arti al_t \x i_0 &= \l ambda _1 \ le f t[ \xi_{1R} + \xi_{ 1L } \rig ht] + \lambda_2\l eft[ \xi_{ 2 R } + \xi_{ 2L}\ ri g ht], \\
v_m \x i_{1R } &= v_m \ x i_{1L} + \lam bda_1 \x i_0, \\
v _ m \xi_{2R } & = v _m\xi _ { 2L } + \lambda_2 \ xi_0 .\label{ eq: Equatio nsO fMo tio n}\ en d{aligned }$$ Here ,we a ga inuse t h e notati on $\ xi _{1 R} =\ xi_1(x =0^+) $, $ \x i_ { 2R} = \xi_ 2 (x = 0 ^+)$ ,$\ xi_{ 1L} = \xi_ 1(x= 0 ^-) $, and$\xi_{2L} =\ xi_2 (x =0 ^-)$. I n frequency s pa ce we find a re lation b etween $ \xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ acro s s the c oup lingpoin ts, $[\xi _{1 }, \xi _{2 } ]_R^T= U(\o mega) [\ xi_ { 1 }, \x i | nu}{eV}})$ in_the differential_conductance when the edge_was coupled_to_one vortex_(Eq._). This can_be generalized if_the chiral Majoranas have_single-point couplings to_several_vortices. In that case $\phi$ is replaced by $\sum_i \phi_i - \sum_j \phi_j$, where_$\phi_i_= \arctan({\frac{\nu_i}{eV}})$_comes_from_vortex-edge-coupling with the upper edge_and $\phi_j$ from coupling with_the lower_edge. Hence, multiple phase crossovers will occur if_several_vortices are located_close to the edge.
One Majorana Coupled to Both Edges_{#sec:CouplingBothEdges}
----------------------------------
Another generalization is to study point-couplings_to both the_lower_and_the upper arm, in_which case the coupling term in_the Lagrangian is $ \pazocal{L}_{\mathrm{bulk}-\mathrm{edge}} =_2 i \lambda_1 \xi_1(x=0) \xi_0 + 2_i \lambda_2 \xi_2(x=0)\xi_0$. The corresponding equations_of motion are $$\begin{aligned}
2\partial_t \xi_0_&= \lambda_1\left[_\xi_{1R} + \xi_{1L} \right] _+ \lambda_2\left[ \xi_{2R}_+ \xi_{2L}_\right], \\
v_m \xi_{1R}_&= v_m \xi_{1L} + \lambda_1 \xi_0,_\\
v_m \xi_{2R} &=_v_m \xi_{2L} + \lambda_2 \xi_0.
\label{eq:EquationsOfMotion}\end{aligned}$$ Here,_we_again use the_notation_$\xi_{1R}_= \xi_1(x=0^+)$,_$\xi_{2R} = \xi_2(x=0^+)$,_$\xi_{1L}_= \xi_1(x=0^-)$,_and_$\xi_{2L} = \xi_2(x=0^-)$. In frequency space_we_find a relation between $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$_across the coupling points,_$[\xi_{1},_\xi_{2}]_R^T = U(\omega)[\xi_{1}, \xi |
_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}}, c_\gamma \in {K}, \alpha_{\gamma_i} \in {K}, \sum_{i=1}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i} \leq \alpha,\end{aligned}$$ where $\Gamma$ ranges over distinct monomials in the free algebra and all but finitely many of the $c_\gamma$ are zero. The homogenization of $f$ is then $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{f} = \sum_{\gamma \in \Gamma} c_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}} x_0^{\alpha_{\gamma_0}},\end{aligned}$$ where $x_0$ is a new, central indeterminate and $\alpha_{\gamma_0}$ is chosen such that $\sum_{i=0}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i} = \alpha$. Then $\hat{f}$ is homogeneous.
\[hom-def\]Let $A$ be of form (\[form\]). The **homogenization** $H(A)$ of $A$ is the ${K}$-algebra on the $n+1$ generators $x_0,x_1,\hdots,x_n$ subject to the homogenized relations $\hat{f}_i$ as well as the additional relations $x_0x_i-x_ix_0$ for all $i \in \{1,\hdots,n\}$.
A *filtration* ${\mathcal{F}}$ on an algebra $A$ is a collection of vector spaces $\{{\mathcal{F}}_n(A)\}$ such that $${\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+1}(A), {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \cdot {\mathcal{F}}_m(A) \subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+m}(A) \text{ and } \bigcup {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) = A.$$ The filtration ${\mathcal{F}}$ is said to be *connected* if ${\mathcal{F}}_0(A)={K}$ and ${\mathcal{F}}_\ell(A) = 0$ for all $\ell < 0$. The *associated graded algebra* of $A$ is $\operatorname{gr}_{\mathcal | _ \gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1 } } \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell } }, c_\gamma \in { K }, \alpha_{\gamma_i } \in { K }, \sum_{i=1}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i } \leq \alpha,\end{aligned}$$ where $ \Gamma$ ranges over distinct monomials in the free algebra and all but finitely many of the $ c_\gamma$ are zero. The homogenization of $ f$ is then $ $ \begin{aligned }
\hat{f } = \sum_{\gamma \in \Gamma } c_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1 } } \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell } } x_0^{\alpha_{\gamma_0}},\end{aligned}$$ where $ x_0 $ is a new, cardinal indeterminate and $ \alpha_{\gamma_0}$ is choose such that $ \sum_{i=0}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i } = \alpha$. Then $ \hat{f}$ is homogeneous.
\[hom - def\]Let $ A$ be of form (\[form\ ]). The * * homogenization * * $ H(A)$ of $ A$ is the $ { K}$-algebra on the $ n+1 $ generators $ x_0,x_1,\hdots, x_n$ capable to the homogenized relation $ \hat{f}_i$ as well as the extra relations $ x_0x_i - x_ix_0 $ for all $ i \in \{1,\hdots, n\}$.
A * filtration * $ { \mathcal{F}}$ on an algebra $ A$ is a collection of vector spaces $ \{{\mathcal{F}}_n(A)\}$ such that $ $ { \mathcal{F}}_n(A) \subset { \mathcal{F}}_{n+1}(A), { \mathcal{F}}_n(A) \cdot { \mathcal{F}}_m(A) \subset { \mathcal{F}}_{n+m}(A) \text { and } \bigcup { \mathcal{F}}_n(A) = A.$$ The filtration $ { \mathcal{F}}$ is say to be * connected * if $ { \mathcal{F}}_0(A)={K}$ and $ { \mathcal{F}}_\ell(A) = 0 $ for all $ \ell < 0$. The * associated grade algebra * of $ A$ is $ \operatorname{gr}_{\mathcal | _\gamla x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\tll}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}}, e_\tamma \mn {K}, \allha_{\gamma_k} \in {K}, \sum_{i=1}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i} \lxq \aopha,\ebd{aligned}$$ where $\Gamma$ fanges ovvr distinxt mibomials in the frec algsnra aud all but finitgly many of dhe $c_\gamma$ are zdrl. The homogenization of $f$ is then $$\bqgin{alibnfd}
\hat{f} = \sui_{\gamkw \in \Gamma} c_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{j_\ell}^{\alpia_{\gamma_\ell}} x_0^{\alpna_{\gamma_0}},\end{aligned}$$ where $x_0$ ls a new, central indetfrminate ane $\al[ya_{\gamma_0}$ is cfosen such that $\sum_{i=0}^\elm \alpha_{\gamma_i} = \alpha$. Then $\hat{f}$ ks hokogeneous.
\[him-eef\]Pgt $A$ be of firm (\[fjrm\]). The **homonvnizatimn** $H(A)$ og $A$ is the ${K}$-alnebra on the $n+1$ generators $x_0,x_1,\hvots,x_n$ subject to thg homogeniseb relations $\hat{f}_i$ as qeol as the addkrioval rxlafions $d_0x_i-e_ix_0$ for all $i \in \{1,\hdots,b\}$.
A *filtration* ${\mathcsl{S}}$ on an algebrz $A$ is a collection of vector spaces $\{{\mathcal{F}}_n(A)\}$ sudh that $${\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \subswt {\mathcal{F}}_{n+1}(A), {\mathcal{V}}_n(A) \cdot {\iathcal{F}}_m(A) \subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+m}(A) \text{ and } \bigcup {\madhcal{H}}_n(X) = C.$$ The wulhration ${\mathcal{F}}$ is said to be *connected* if ${\mwfhvak{F}}_0(A)={K}$ and ${\mathccl{F}}_\ell(A) = 0$ for alk $\flk < 0$. The *associxted gxzdsd algebra* of $A$ is $\operatjrnamw{gr}_{\mathcaj | _\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}}, c_\gamma \in {K}, {K}, \alpha_{\gamma_i} \leq where $\Gamma$ ranges free and all but many of the are zero. The homogenization of $f$ then $$\begin{aligned} \hat{f} = \sum_{\gamma \in \Gamma} c_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}} x_0^{\alpha_{\gamma_0}},\end{aligned}$$ where is a new, central indeterminate and $\alpha_{\gamma_0}$ is chosen such that $\sum_{i=0}^\ell \alpha_{\gamma_i} \alpha$. $\hat{f}$ homogeneous. $A$ be of form (\[form\]). The **homogenization** $H(A)$ of $A$ is the ${K}$-algebra on the $n+1$ $x_0,x_1,\hdots,x_n$ subject to the homogenized relations $\hat{f}_i$ as as the additional relations for all $i \in \{1,\hdots,n\}$. *filtration* on an $A$ a of vector spaces such that $${\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+1}(A), {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \cdot {\mathcal{F}}_m(A) \subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+m}(A) \text{ and } \bigcup {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) = A.$$ filtration ${\mathcal{F}}$ to be if and = 0$ for < 0$. The *associated graded algebra* $\operatorname{gr}_{\mathcal | _\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots x_{i_\eLl}^{\alpha_{\gamMa_\ell}}, C_\gaMma \In {k}, \alpHa_{\gaMma_i} \in {K}, \sum_{i=1}^\ell \ALpha_{\Gamma_i} \leq \alpha,\end{alignEd}$$ wheRe $\gAmma$ RAnGes ovEr distiNCt MONomIaLs In tHe FReE algeBra And all bUt finitely ManY oF the $c_\gamma$ arE ZeRo. The homogEniZation of $f$ is tHen $$\Begin{aLiGneD}
\Hat{f} = \sUm_{\gAmma \iN \Gamma} C_\Gamma x_{I_1}^{\alpha_{\gamMa_1}} \CDots x_{i_\ELl}^{\alpha_{\GAMmA_\ell}} X_0^{\alpha_{\gamma_0}},\end{aliGNeD}$$ Where $x_0$ is a new, ceNtral iNdETeRMInaTe aNd $\alpha_{\gamMa_0}$ Is choSEn such tHAt $\SUM_{I=0}^\elL \Alpha_{\gamma_i} = \alPha$. Then $\hat{f}$ IS hoMogeneOuS.
\[hoM-Def\]Let $a$ be of FoRM (\[foRm\]). The **homogeNizaTion** $H(A)$ of $A$ Is the ${K}$-ALgebra oN The $n+1$ genEratorS $x_0,x_1,\HdoTs,x_n$ SUbJeCt tO tHE hoMOgEniZEd rElations $\HaT{f}_I$ as weLl as THE ADditIonAl reLatioNs $x_0x_i-x_ix_0$ for alL $i \iN \{1,\hdoTS,n\}$.
A *FiltrAtion* ${\MathCaL{F}}$ on aN algebRa $A$ is A cOllection of vectOr spAces $\{{\mathcAl{F}}_N(A)\}$ SucH tHat $${\maTHcal{F}}_n(a) \suBseT {\mathcaL{F}}_{n+1}(A), {\matHCal{f}}_n(a) \CDOt {\Mathcal{F}}_m(A) \subset {\maThCAL{F}}_{N+m}(A) \text{ aNd } \bigcUP {\mAtHCal{F}}_n(A) = A.$$ THe FilTratION ${\mathCal{F}}$ IS sAid to be *cOnnectED* iF ${\mAthcal{F}}_0(a)={K}$ And ${\matHcAl{F}}_\Ell(a) = 0$ for aLL $\ell < 0$. the *assOciated gRaded ALgebra* of $A$ is $\opeRAtorname{gr}_{\matHCaL | _\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\ gamma_1}}\cdot s x _{i _\ ell} ^{\a lpha_{\gamma_\ e ll}} , c_\gamma \in {K}, \a lpha_ {\ g amma _ i} \in{K}, \s u m_ { i =1} ^\ el l \ al p ha _{\ga mma _i} \le q \alpha,\ end {a ligned}$$ wh e re $\Gamma$ran ges over dis tin ct mon om ial s in t hefreealgebr a and a ll but fi ni t ely ma n y of th e $c _\ga mma$ are zero. Th e h o mogenization o f $f$is th e n $$ \be gin{aligne d}
\ hat{f}= \ s u m _{\ g amma \in \Gam ma} c_\gamm a x_ {i_1}^ {\ alp h a_{\ga mma_1 }} \cd ots x_{i_\e ll}^ {\alpha_{ \gamma _ \ell}}x _0^{\al pha_{\ gam ma_ 0}}, \ en d{ ali gn e d}$ $ w her e $x _0$ is a n ew , cen tral i n d eter min ateand $ \alpha_{\gamm a_0 }$ i s ch osensuchthat $ \sum_ {i=0}^ \ell\a lpha_{\gamma_i} = \ alpha$. T hen $ \ha t{ f}$ i s homog ene ous .
\[ho m-def\] L et$A $ b eof form (\[form\]) .T h e**homoge nizati o n* *$ H(A)$ of $ A$is t h e ${K} $-al g eb ra on th e $n+1 $ g en erators $ x_0,x_ 1, \hd ots ,x_n$ subj ect to the hom ogeni z ed relations $ \ hat{f}_i$ asw el l as theadd itional rel atio n s $x _0x_ i -x _ix _ 0$ fo r all $ i \ i n \{1,\hdots,n\}$.
A *filt ratio n* ${\mathcal {F}}$ on a n a lgebra $ A$ i s a collection ofvecto r spaces $ \ {{\mathc al{F} }_n(A)\} $ such th a t $${\mat hca l{F }}_ n(A ) \s ubset {\mathc a l {F}} _{ n+1}(A) , { \mathca l{F }}_ n(A ) \ cd ot {\math cal{F}}_ m( A) \ su bse t {\m a thcal{F} }_ {n+ m} (A) \tex t { and} \bi gcup { \m a thc al{F}}_ n (A ) = A. $$ T he f ilt ra tion${\m a thc al{F}}$ is saidtob e *c on ne cted* i f ${\mathcal{ F} }_0(A)={K} $and ${\ma t h cal{F}}_ \ell(A) = 0$ for all $\ e ll < 0$ . T he *a ssoc iated gra ded algeb ra* of $A$ is $\ opera to rna m e {gr}_ { \ ma thc al | _\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}}_\cdots x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}},_c_\gamma \in {K}, \alpha_{\gamma_i}_\in {K},_\sum_{i=1}^\ell_\alpha_{\gamma_i} \leq_\alpha,\end{aligned}$$_where $\Gamma$ ranges_over distinct monomials_in the free algebra_and all but_finitely_many of the $c_\gamma$ are zero. The homogenization of $f$ is then $$\begin{aligned}
__ \hat{f}_=_\sum_{\gamma_\in \Gamma} c_\gamma x_{i_1}^{\alpha_{\gamma_1}} \cdots_x_{i_\ell}^{\alpha_{\gamma_\ell}} x_0^{\alpha_{\gamma_0}},\end{aligned}$$ where $x_0$ is_a new,_central indeterminate and $\alpha_{\gamma_0}$ is chosen such that_$\sum_{i=0}^\ell_\alpha_{\gamma_i} = \alpha$._Then $\hat{f}$ is homogeneous.
\[hom-def\]Let $A$ be of form (\[form\])._The **homogenization** $H(A)$ of $A$ is_the ${K}$-algebra on_the_$n+1$_generators $x_0,x_1,\hdots,x_n$ subject to_the homogenized relations $\hat{f}_i$ as well_as the additional relations $x_0x_i-x_ix_0$ for_all $i \in \{1,\hdots,n\}$.
A *filtration* ${\mathcal{F}}$ on_an algebra $A$ is a collection_of vector spaces $\{{\mathcal{F}}_n(A)\}$ such_that $${\mathcal{F}}_n(A)_\subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+1}(A), {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) \cdot {\mathcal{F}}_m(A)_\subset {\mathcal{F}}_{n+m}(A) \text{_and }_\bigcup {\mathcal{F}}_n(A) =_A.$$ The filtration ${\mathcal{F}}$ is said_to be *connected*_if ${\mathcal{F}}_0(A)={K}$ and ${\mathcal{F}}_\ell(A) = 0$_for_all $\ell <_0$._The_*associated graded_algebra* of $A$_is_$\operatorname{gr}_{\mathcal |
:P^n =
P(V) \rightarrow ]L_i[)$ is equivalent to the choice of $m-n-1$ surjective linear operators $a_i: W^*\rightarrow V^*$. Namely, given such $a_i$, we associate to any hyperplane in $V^*$ i.e. to any point of $P(V)$ its inverse image under $a_i$. Thus a point $\pi\in G^n(W)$ corresponding to $x\in P(V)$ is $\bigcap {\rm Ker} (a_i(x))$. Define a linear map $A: {\bf C}^{m-n-1} \rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by setting $a_i = A(e_i)$ where $e_1,...,e_{m-n-1}$ is the standard basis of ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$. Denote the space ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$ by $I$. This defines a tensor $t\in I^*\otimes W\otimes V^*$ which, in its turn, defines a morphism of sheaves $I\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}(-1) \rightarrow W\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}$. Our bundle $E$ must be the cokernel of this morphism. Indeed, dualizing, we have to show that $E^*$ is the kernel of the dual map $W^*\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)} \rightarrow I^*\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}(1)$. This is defined by a linear map $A^\dagger: V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,I^*)$ associated to $t$. The fiber of this bundle over a point ${\bf C}v$ of $P(V)$ is equal to the kernel of the linear map $A^\dagger (v): L^*\rightarrow I^*$. The latter is dual to the point of $X\i G^n(W)$ corresponding to $x$. This identifies the fibres. The converse reasoning is obvious.
3.9. Proposition [\[E\]]{}. The rank of a non-trivial Steiner bundle on $P^n$ is greater or equal to $n$.
[*Proof:*]{} Let $r$ be the rank. A Steiner bundle is given by a linear map $V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(I,W)$ where ${\ | : P^n =
P(V) \rightarrow ] L_i[)$ is equivalent to the choice of $ m - n-1 $ surjective linear operators $ a_i: W^*\rightarrow V^*$. Namely, given such $ a_i$, we consort to any hyperplane in $ V^*$ i.e. to any item of $ P(V)$ its inverse image under $ a_i$. Thus a point $ \pi\in G^n(W)$ equate to $ x\in P(V)$ is $ \bigcap { \rm Ker } (a_i(x))$. Define a linear function $ A: { \bf C}^{m - n-1 } \rightarrow { \rm Hom}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by setting $ a_i = A(e_i)$ where $ e_1,... ,e_{m - n-1}$ is the standard basis of $ { \bf C}^{m - n-1}$. Denote the outer space $ { \bf C}^{m - n-1}$ by $ I$. This defines a tensor $ t\in I^*\otimes W\otimes V^*$ which, in its turn, define a morphism of sheaves $ I\otimes { \cal O}_{P(V)}(-1) \rightarrow W\otimes { \cal O}_{P(V)}$. Our bundle $ E$ must be the cokernel of this morphism. Indeed, dualizing, we get to show that $ E^*$ is the kernel of the dual map $ W^*\otimes { \cal O}_{P(V) } \rightarrow I^*\otimes { \cal O}_{P(V)}(1)$. This is defined by a linear map $ A^\dagger: V\rightarrow { \rm Hom}\,(W^*,I^*)$ associate to $ t$. The fiber of this bundle over a point $ { \bf C}v$ of $ P(V)$ is adequate to the kernel of the linear map $ A^\dagger (volt ): L^*\rightarrow I^*$. The latter is dual to the detail of $ X\i G^n(W)$ corresponding to $ x$. This identifies the fibres. The converse reasoning is obvious.
3.9. Proposition [ \[E\ ] ] { }. The rank of a non - trivial Steiner package on $ P^n$ is greater or equal to $ n$.
[ * Proof :* ] { } Let $ r$ be the rank. A Steiner bundle is given by a linear map $ V\rightarrow { \rm Hom}\,(I, W)$ where $ { \ | :P^n =
P(V) \rightarrow ]L_i[)$ is equlvalent to the ckiice oh $m-n-1$ sudjective linear operators $a_i: W^*\rightacrow V^*$. Nanely, given such $a_i$, we xssociate to any yypecplane in $V^*$ i.e. to any polut of $I(V)$ itv inverse image under $a_i$. Dhus a point $\ph\iv Y^n(W)$ corresponding to $x\in P(V)$ is $\bigca[ {\rm Ket} (w_i(x))$. Define a lyneag iap $Z: {\bf C}^{m-n-1} \rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by sefting $a_p = A(e_i)$ where $e_1,...,e_{m-n-1}$ is the standard basis of ${\hf C}^{l-n-1}$. Denote the spacf ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$ by $I$. Trus defines a tensor $t\in I^*\otimes W\ojimes V^*$ which, in its turn, definer a mprphism of syeaggs $I\otimes {\cel O}_{P(V)}(-1) \rightarrow W\otimes {\wal O}_{P(V)}$. Our bundle $E$ kusv be the cokernel of this morphism. Indeed, doalizing, wa kave to show that $E^*$ iw rhe kgrnel of gye auam kal $W^*\otiles {\cal O}_{P(V)} \rjghtarrow I^*\itimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}(1)$. This if defined by a lineaw iap $A^\dagger: V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,I^*)$ associdtes to $t$. The fiber of thiw bundle over a point ${\bf C}v$ of $P(V)$ is equal to the kernel of the linear map $A^\dagcer (v): U^*\riymbarruq L^*$. The latter is dual to the point of $X\i G^n(W)$ cjdrtsppnding to $x$. Thls identifies the gihrrf. The conversg reasoujnf is obvious.
3.9. Proposltion [\[E\]]{}. The eank of a non-yrivial Steiner bundle on $P^b$ is greater ir equal to $n$.
[*Proof:*]{} Let $r$ be tke ranl. A Syeiner bundle is given yy a ljnear map $V\gightarros {\rm Hom}\,(I,W)$ where ${\ | :P^n = P(V) \rightarrow ]L_i[)$ is equivalent choice $m-n-1$ surjective operators $a_i: W^*\rightarrow we to any hyperplane $V^*$ i.e. to point of $P(V)$ its inverse image $a_i$. Thus a point $\pi\in G^n(W)$ corresponding to $x\in P(V)$ is $\bigcap {\rm (a_i(x))$. Define a linear map $A: {\bf C}^{m-n-1} \rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by setting = where is standard basis of ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$. Denote the space ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$ by $I$. This defines a tensor I^*\otimes W\otimes V^*$ which, in its turn, defines morphism of sheaves $I\otimes O}_{P(V)}(-1) \rightarrow W\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}$. bundle must be cokernel this Indeed, dualizing, we to show that $E^*$ is the kernel of the dual map $W^*\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)} \rightarrow I^*\otimes {\cal This is a linear $A^\dagger: {\rm associated to $t$. of this bundle over a point $P(V)$ is equal to the kernel of the map $A^\dagger L^*\rightarrow I^*$. The latter is dual the point of $X\i G^n(W)$ corresponding to $x$. identifies the fibres. The converse reasoning is obvious. 3.9. Proposition [\[E\]]{}. The rank of a bundle on $P^n$ is or equal to [*Proof:*]{} $r$ the A Steiner is given by a linear map $V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(I,W)$ where ${\ | :P^n =
P(V) \rightarrow ]L_i[)$ is equivalEnt to the chOice oF $m-n-1$ SurJeCtivE linEar operators $a_i: w^*\RighTarrow V^*$. Namely, given such $A_i$, we aSsOCiatE To Any hyPerplanE In $v^*$ I.E. to AnY pOinT oF $p(V)$ Its inVerSe image Under $a_i$. ThuS a pOiNt $\pi\in G^n(W)$ corREsPonding to $x\In P(v)$ is $\bigcap {\rm KEr} (a_I(x))$. DefiNe A liNEar maP $A: {\bF C}^{m-n-1} \rIghtarROw {\rm HoM}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by settInG $A_i = A(e_i)$ wHEre $e_1,...,e_{m-n-1}$ IS ThE staNdard basis of ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$. dEnOTe the space ${\bf C}^{m-N-1}$ by $I$. ThIs DEfINEs a TenSor $t\in I^*\otiMeS W\otiMEs V^*$ whicH, In ITS TurN, Defines a morphIsm of sheaveS $i\otImes {\caL O}_{p(V)}(-1) \rIGhtarrOw W\otImES {\caL O}_{P(V)}$. Our bundLe $E$ mUst be the cOkerneL Of this mORphism. INdeed, dUalIziNg, we HAvE tO shOw THat $e^*$ Is The KErnEl of the dUaL mAp $W^*\otImes {\CAL o}_{p(V)} \riGhtArroW I^*\otiMes {\cal O}_{P(V)}(1)$. This Is dEfinED by A lineAr map $a^\dagGeR: V\rigHtarroW {\rm HoM}\,(W^*,i^*)$ associated to $t$. THe fiBer of this BunDlE ovEr A poinT ${\Bf C}v$ of $p(V)$ iS eqUal to thE kernel OF thE lINEAr Map $A^\dagger (v): L^*\rightaRrOW i^*$. THe latter Is dual TO tHe POint of $X\i g^n(w)$ coRresPONding To $x$. THIs IdentifiEs the fIBrEs. the convErSe reasOnIng Is oBviouS.
3.9. propOsitioN [\[E\]]{}. The ranK of a nON-trivial SteineR Bundle on $P^n$ is gREaTER oR EquaL to $N$.
[*Proof:*]{} Let $r$ bE the RAnk. A steiNEr BunDLe is gIven bY a LInEAr map $V\rightarrow {\rm HOm}\,(i,W)$ wherE ${\ | :P^n =
P(V) \rightarrow ] L_i[)$ isequiv ale ntto the cho ice of $m-n-1$ surj ective linear operator s $a_ i: W^*\ r ig htarr ow V^*$ . N a m ely ,gi ven s u ch $a_i $,we asso ciate to a nyhy perplane in$ V^ *$ i.e. to an y point of $ P(V )$ its i nve r se im age unde r $a_i $ . Thus a point$\ p i\in G ^ n(W)$ c o r re spon ding to $x\in P(V ) $i s $\bigcap {\r m Ker} ( a _i ( x ))$ . D efine a li ne ar ma p $A: {\ b fC } ^ {m- n -1} \rightarr ow {\rm Hom } \,( W^*,V^ *) $ b y setti ng $a _i = A (e_i)$ wher e $e _1,...,e_ {m-n-1 } $ is th e standa rd bas isof${\b f C }^ {m- n- 1 }$. De not e th e space${ \b f C}^ {m-n - 1 } $ by$I$ . Th is de fines a tenso r $ t\in I^* \otim es W\ otim es V^*$ which , init s turn, defines a m orphism o f s he ave s$I\ot i mes {\ cal O} _{P(V)} (-1) \r i ght ar r o w W \otimes {\cal O}_{ P( V ) }$ . Our bu ndle $ E $mu s t be the c oke rnel o f thi s mo r ph ism. Ind eed, d u al iz ing, we h ave to s how th at $E ^ *$ i s thekernel o f the dual map $W^*\ o times {\cal O } _{ P ( V) } \ri ght arrow I^*\o time s {\c al O } _{ P(V ) }(1)$ . Thi si sd efined by a linearma p $A^\ dagge r: V\rightarr ow {\rm Ho m } \ ,(W^*,I^ *)$a ss o ciated to $t$. Thefiber of t h is bundl e ove r a poin t ${\bf C } v $ of $P( V)$ is eq ual t othe kernel of t he l in ear map $A ^\dagge r ( v): L^ *\r ig htarrow I ^*$. The l at te risdualt o the po in t o f$X\ i G^n ( W)$ co rresp ondi ng t o $x $. This id e n tifi es t he f ibr es . The con v ers e reaso ning is o bvi o us.
3 .9 . Propo sition [\[E\] ]{ }. The ran kofa non- t r ivial St einer bundle on $P^n$ i s greate r o r equ al t o $n$.
[ *Pr oof:*] {}L et $r$ be th e ran k. AS t einer b un dle i s given by a li nearma p $V \righta rrow {\rm Hom}\,(I , W)$ where ${\ | :P^n =
_P(V) \rightarrow_]L_i[)$ is equivalent to_the choice_of_$m-n-1$ surjective_linear_operators $a_i: W^*\rightarrow_V^*$. Namely, given_such $a_i$, we associate_to any hyperplane_in_$V^*$ i.e. to any point of $P(V)$ its inverse image under $a_i$. Thus a_point_$\pi\in G^n(W)$_corresponding_to_$x\in P(V)$ is $\bigcap {\rm_Ker} (a_i(x))$. Define a linear_map $A:_{\bf C}^{m-n-1} \rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,V^*)$ by setting $a_i_=_A(e_i)$ where $e_1,...,e_{m-n-1}$_is the standard basis of ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$. Denote the_space ${\bf C}^{m-n-1}$ by $I$. This_defines a tensor_$t\in_I^*\otimes_W\otimes V^*$ which, in_its turn, defines a morphism of_sheaves $I\otimes {\cal O}_{P(V)}(-1) \rightarrow W\otimes_{\cal O}_{P(V)}$. Our bundle $E$ must be_the cokernel of this morphism. Indeed,_dualizing, we have to show_that $E^*$_is the kernel of the_dual map $W^*\otimes_{\cal O}_{P(V)}_\rightarrow I^*\otimes {\cal_O}_{P(V)}(1)$. This is defined by a_linear map $A^\dagger:_V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(W^*,I^*)$ associated to $t$._The_fiber of this_bundle_over_a point_${\bf C}v$ of_$P(V)$_is equal_to_the kernel of the linear map_$A^\dagger_(v): L^*\rightarrow I^*$. The latter is dual_to the point of_$X\i_G^n(W)$ corresponding to $x$._This identifies the fibres. The_converse reasoning is obvious.
3.9. Proposition [\[E\]]{}. The_rank of_a non-trivial_Steiner bundle on $P^n$ is greater or equal to $n$.
[*Proof:*]{} Let_$r$ be the rank. A Steiner_bundle is given by_a linear_map_$V\rightarrow {\rm Hom}\,(I,W)$_where_${\ |
to construct a Lie contact structure on $M$ from the later data. In general, the Levi bracket is a section of the bundle ${\Lambda}^2 H^*\otimes TM/H$, which decomposes according to the isomorphism $H\cong L^*\otimes R$ as $({\Lambda}^2L\otimes S^2R^*\otimes TM/H)\oplus(S^2L\otimes{\Lambda}^2R^*\otimes TM/H)$. Since we assume ${\varphi}\otimes R$ is isotropic with respect to $\L$, for any ${\varphi}$, the Levi bracket $\L$ factorizes through the first summand only. Since we assume a fixed identification of line bundles ${\Lambda}^2L^*$ and $TM/H$, i.e. a trivialization of ${\Lambda}^2L\otimes TM/H$, the Levi bracket determines a (non-degenerate) bundle metric on $R$, which accomplishes the Lie contact structure on $M$. In particular, if $O(R_x)$ is the group of orthogonal transformations of $R_x$ according to this inner product, then the Levi bracket is by construction invariant under the action of $O(R_x)$, over each $x\in M$.
Split quaternions {#2.4}
-----------------
The algebra of *split quaternions* $\H_s$ is the four-dimensional real algebra admitting a basis $(1,i,j,k)$ such that $i^2=j^2=1$ and $k=ij=-ji$ (consequently $k^2=-1$, $kj=-jk=i$, etc.). As an associative algebra, $\H_s$ is isomorphic to the space of $2\x2$ real matrices so that the norm on $\H_s$ corresponds to the determinant. This correspondence is explicitly given by $$\label{eq5}
1\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}},\ i\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}},\
j\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}},\ k\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}}.$$ In particular, the norm squared of $i,j$, and $k$, equals $-1,-1$, and 1, respectively. For general imaginary quaternion $q=ai+bj+ | to construct a Lie contact structure on $ M$ from the later datum. In cosmopolitan, the Levi bracket is a part of the bundle $ { \Lambda}^2 H^*\otimes TM / H$, which decomposes accord to the isomorphism $ H\cong L^*\otimes R$ as $ ({ \Lambda}^2L\otimes S^2R^*\otimes TM / H)\oplus(S^2L\otimes{\Lambda}^2R^*\otimes TM / H)$. Since we assume $ { \varphi}\otimes R$ is isotropic with respect to $ \L$, for any $ { \varphi}$, the Levi bracket $ \L$ factorize through the first summand only. Since we assume a sterilize identification of line pile $ { \Lambda}^2L^*$ and $ TM / H$, i.e. a trivialization of $ { \Lambda}^2L\otimes TM / H$, the Levi bracket determines a (non - degenerate) bunch metric on $ R$, which accomplishes the Lie contact structure on $ M$. In particular, if $ O(R_x)$ is the group of extraneous transformations of $ R_x$ according to this inner intersection, then the Levi bracket is by construction invariant under the military action of $ O(R_x)$, over each $ x\in M$.
Split quaternions { # 2.4 }
-----------------
The algebra of * rip quaternions * $ \H_s$ is the four - dimensional real algebra admitting a basis $ (1,i, j, k)$ such that $ i^2 = j^2=1 $ and $ k = ij=-ji$ (consequently $ k^2=-1 $, $ kj=-jk = i$, etc .). As an associative algebra, $ \H_s$ is isomorphous to the space of $ 2\x2 $ real matrices so that the norm on $ \H_s$ corresponds to the determinant. This symmetry is explicitly given by $ $ \label{eq5 }
1\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}},\ i\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}},\
j\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}},\ k\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}}.$$ In particular, the norm squared of $ i, j$, and $ k$, equals $ -1,-1 $, and 1, respectively. For general imaginary quaternion $ q = ai+bj+ | to construct a Lie contact structure on $M$ from tie lated data. Iv general, the Levi bracket id q secupon of the bundle ${\Lamcda}^2 H^*\otimvs TM/H$, whuch vecomposes accorvjng to bke isklorpkiwm $H\cong L^*\otimgs R$ as $({\Lambga}^2L\otimes S^2R^*\othmds TM/H)\oplus(S^2L\otimes{\Lambda}^2R^*\otimes TM/H)$. Fince wr wssume ${\varphi}\ojimes W$ is psitropic with respect to $\L$, for any ${\vagphi}$, the Levi bravket $\L$ factorizes through hhe virst summand only. Since we awsumq a fixed idevtification of line buhdles ${\Lambda}^2L^*$ and $TM/H$, i.e. a trivkalizction of ${\Lanbea}^2L\ljimes TM/H$, thx Levi bracket detcgmines d (non-debenerate) bundlc metcic in $R$, which accomplishxs the Lie contact sjructure ot $J$. In particular, id $I(R_x)$ iv tha gruyp uf krvhofonal hraisformationa of $R_x$ accirding to this innet [gpduct, then tge Levy fracket is by construction invariant unger the action of $O(R_x)$, over each $x\in M$.
Split quatgrnions {#2.4}
-----------------
Thq algebra of *split quaternions* $\H_s$ is the four-dimetsionel reco algdvrw admitting a basis $(1,i,j,k)$ such that $i^2=j^2=1$ and $k=ij=-jy$ (cpnxequently $k^2=-1$, $kj=-mk=i$, etc.). As an assoviwtode algebra, $\H_s$ is isomodphic to the space of $2\x2$ rgal marrices so thay the norm on $\H_s$ correspondw to the detvrmibant. This correspoudence is ex'licitky gifen by $$\label{eq5}
1\mapsto{\bzgin{pmztrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmahrix}},\ i\mapago{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\ena{pmstsix}},\
j\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\egd{pmatrix}},\ k\ma'sto{\begiv{pmajrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{[matrix}}.$$ In partlwular, the norm squwred lf $i,j$, and $k$, fquals $-1,-1$, and 1, respectively. For gxieral imaginaty xuanernion $q=ci+bj+ | to construct a Lie contact structure on the data. In the Levi bracket bundle H^*\otimes TM/H$, which according to the $H\cong L^*\otimes R$ as $({\Lambda}^2L\otimes S^2R^*\otimes TM/H)$. Since we assume ${\varphi}\otimes R$ is isotropic with respect to $\L$, for ${\varphi}$, the Levi bracket $\L$ factorizes through the first summand only. Since we a identification line ${\Lambda}^2L^*$ and $TM/H$, i.e. a trivialization of ${\Lambda}^2L\otimes TM/H$, the Levi bracket determines a (non-degenerate) bundle on $R$, which accomplishes the Lie contact structure $M$. In particular, if is the group of orthogonal of according to inner then Levi bracket is construction invariant under the action of $O(R_x)$, over each $x\in M$. Split quaternions {#2.4} ----------------- The algebra *split quaternions* the four-dimensional algebra a $(1,i,j,k)$ such that $k=ij=-ji$ (consequently $k^2=-1$, $kj=-jk=i$, etc.). As $\H_s$ is isomorphic to the space of $2\x2$ matrices so the norm on $\H_s$ corresponds to determinant. This correspondence is explicitly given by $$\label{eq5} i\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}},\ j\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}},\ k\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}}.$$ In particular, the norm squared of $i,j$, and $k$, equals $-1,-1$, and For general imaginary quaternion | to construct a Lie contact strUcture on $M$ fRom thE laTer DaTa. In GeneRal, the Levi bracKEt is A section of the bundle ${\LamBda}^2 H^*\oTiMEs TM/h$, WhIch deComposeS AcCORdiNg To The IsOMoRphisM $H\cOng L^*\otiMes R$ as $({\LambDa}^2L\OtImes S^2R^*\otimes tm/H)\Oplus(S^2L\otiMes{\lambda}^2R^*\otimeS TM/h)$. Since We AssUMe ${\varPhi}\OtimeS R$ is isOTropic With respeCt TO $\L$, for aNY ${\varphi}$, THE LEvi bRacket $\L$ factorizes THrOUgh the first sumMand onLy. sInCE We aSsuMe a fixed idEnTificATion of lINe BUNDleS ${\lambda}^2L^*$ and $TM/H$, I.e. a trivialiZAtiOn of ${\LaMbDa}^2L\OTimes Tm/H$, the leVI brAcket determInes A (non-degenErate) bUNdle metRIc on $R$, whIch accOmpLisHes tHE LIe ConTaCT stRUcTurE On $M$. in particUlAr, If $O(R_x)$ Is thE GROUp of OrtHogoNal trAnsformations Of $R_X$ accORdiNg to tHis inNer pRoDuct, tHen the levi bRaCket is by construCtioN invarianT unDeR thE aCtion OF $O(R_x)$, ovEr eAch $X\in M$.
SplIt quateRNioNs {#2.4}
-----------------
tHE AlGebra of *split quaterNiONS* $\H_S$ is the foUr-dimeNSiOnAL real algEbRa aDmitTINg a baSis $(1,i,J,K)$ sUch that $i^2=J^2=1$ and $k=iJ=-Ji$ (CoNsequenTlY $k^2=-1$, $kj=-jk=I$, eTc.). AS an AssocIAtivE algebRa, $\H_s$ is isOmorpHIc to the space of $2\X2$ Real matrices sO ThAT ThE Norm On $\H_S$ correspondS to tHE detErmiNAnT. ThIS corrEsponDeNCe IS explicitly given by $$\lAbEl{eq5}
1\maPsto{\bEgin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\enD{pmatrix}},\ i\mAPSTo{\begin{pMatrIX}1&0\\0&-1\eND{pmatrix}},\
j\mapstO{\begiN{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\enD{Pmatrix}},\ k\MapstO{\begin{pmAtrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pMATrix}}.$$ In paRtiCulAr, tHe nORM sQuared of $i,j$, and $K$, EQualS $-1,-1$, aNd 1, respeCtiVely. For GenEraL imAgiNaRy quaternIon $q=ai+bj+ | to construct a Lie contac t structur e on$M$ fr om the lat er data. In ge n eral , the Levi bracket isa sec ti o n of th e bun dle ${\ L am b d a}^ 2H^ *\o ti m es TM/H $,which d ecomposesacc or ding to thei so morphism $ H\c ong L^*\otim esR$ as$( {\L a mbda} ^2L \otim es S^2 R ^*\oti mes TM/H) \o p lus(S^ 2 L\otime s { \L ambd a}^2R^*\otimes TM / H) $ . Since we ass ume ${ \v a rp h i }\o tim es R$ is i so tropi c with r e sp e c t to $\L$, for any ${\varphi} $ , t he Lev ibra c ket $\ L$ fa ct o riz es throughthefirst sum mand o n ly. Sin c e we as sume a fi xed ide n ti fi cat io n of li neb und les ${\L am bd a}^2L ^*$a n d $TM/ H$, i.e . a t rivialization of ${\ L amb da}^2 L\oti mesTM /H$,the Le vi br ac ket determinesa (n on-degene rat e) bu nd le me t ric on $R $,which a ccompli s hes t h e Li e contact structur eo n $ M$. In p articu l ar ,i f $O(R_x )$ is the g roupof o r th ogonal t ransfo r ma ti ons of$R _x$ ac co rdi ngto th i s in ner pr oduct, t hen t h e Levi bracket is by constru c ti o n i n vari ant under theacti o n of $O( R _x )$, overeach$x \ in M$.
Split quaterni on s {#2. 4}
-- ------------- --
The al g e b ra of *s plit qu a ternions* $\H_ s$ is the four- d imension al re al algeb ra admitt i n g a basi s $ (1, i,j ,k) $ su ch that $i^2= j ^ 2=1$ a nd $k=i j=- ji$ (co nse que ntl y $ k^ 2=-1$, $k j=-jk=i$ ,et c. ). As an a s sociativ ealg eb ra, $\H_ s $ is i somor phic t ot hespace o f $ 2 \ x2$re al mat ric es so t hatt henorm on $\H_s$ c orr e spon ds t o the d eterminant. T hi s correspo nd enc e is e x p licitlygiven by $$\label{eq5} 1\maps to{ \begi n{pm atrix}1&0 \\0 &1\end {pm a trix}} ,\ i\m apsto {\ beg i n {pmat r i x} 1&0 \\ 0&-1\end{p m a tri x}},\ j\ mapsto{ \begin{pmatrix}0&1 \ \1& 0\end{pmatrix }}, \ k\ m a ps to{ \ be g in{ pm a tri x } 0&1\\-1&0\end{p matrix}}.$ $I nparticular , th enorm sq uared o f $i, j $, and$k$, equa ls $-1,-1 $, and 1 , r espectivel y. For g eneral im a ginar y q uater nio n $q=a i+ bj+ | to_construct a_Lie contact structure on_$M$ from_the_later data._In_general, the Levi_bracket is a_section of the bundle_${\Lambda}^2 H^*\otimes TM/H$,_which_decomposes according to the isomorphism $H\cong L^*\otimes R$ as $({\Lambda}^2L\otimes S^2R^*\otimes TM/H)\oplus(S^2L\otimes{\Lambda}^2R^*\otimes TM/H)$. Since_we_assume ${\varphi}\otimes_R$_is_isotropic with respect to $\L$,_for any ${\varphi}$, the Levi_bracket $\L$_factorizes through the first summand only. Since we_assume_a fixed identification_of line bundles ${\Lambda}^2L^*$ and $TM/H$, i.e. a trivialization_of ${\Lambda}^2L\otimes TM/H$, the Levi bracket_determines a (non-degenerate)_bundle_metric_on $R$, which accomplishes_the Lie contact structure on $M$._In particular, if $O(R_x)$ is the_group of orthogonal transformations of $R_x$ according_to this inner product, then the_Levi bracket is by construction_invariant under_the action of $O(R_x)$, over_each $x\in M$.
Split_quaternions {#2.4}
-----------------
The_algebra of *split_quaternions* $\H_s$ is the four-dimensional real_algebra admitting a_basis $(1,i,j,k)$ such that $i^2=j^2=1$ and_$k=ij=-ji$_(consequently $k^2=-1$, $kj=-jk=i$,_etc.)._As_an associative_algebra, $\H_s$ is_isomorphic_to the_space_of $2\x2$ real matrices so that_the_norm on $\H_s$ corresponds to the determinant._This correspondence is explicitly_given_by $$\label{eq5}
1\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}},\_i\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}},\
j\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}},\ k\mapsto{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}}.$$_In particular, the norm squared of_$i,j$, and_$k$, equals_$-1,-1$, and 1, respectively. For general imaginary quaternion $q=ai+bj+ |
n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where the final inequality follows from applying Brun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theorem 2.2]). By Mertens’ Theorem (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have $$\label{brunexcept} X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$
Now, suppose that $k > 1$. On one hand, for all $k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the other hand, Lemma \[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bigohppracexcept} O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers $n \leq X$. For such numbers $n$, for all $i \geq 1$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_j \end{aligned}$$ where the inequalities follow, respectively, from Lemma \[l2\], Lemma \[cor2\] and the assumption that there exists an index $j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combine the inequality from applied with $k = j$ with to show that $$1 + \sum_{l \leq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ | n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2 } } 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2 } \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where the final inequality follows from applying Brun ’s Sieve (cf. [ @hr Theorem 2.2 ]). By Mertens ’ Theorem (californium. [ @pollack Theorem 3.15 ]), we take $ $ \label{brunexcept } X \prod_{q \leq Y^2 } \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$
Now, suppose that $ k > 1$. On one hand, for all $ potassium > 1 $, we have $ $ \label{lpeq1 } 1 + \sum_{l \leq k } \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l) } = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k } \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta } d_k.$$ On the early hand, Lemma \[cor2\ ] implies that $ \ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $ $ \begin{aligned }
\label{bigohppracexcept } O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta } \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers $ n \leq X$. For such number $ n$, for all $ i \geq 1 $, we have $ $ \begin{aligned }
\label{lpeq2 } \ell^*_p(d_{j+i }) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n } > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta } } > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta } } = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta } d_j \end{aligned}$$ where the inequalities surveil, respectively, from Lemma \[l2\ ], Lemma \[cor2\ ] and the assumption that there exists an exponent $ j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combine the inequality from applied with $ k = j$ with to show that $ $ 1 + \sum_{l \leq j } \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ | n \lfq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \ueq Y^2} \left(1 - \frae{1}{w}\right),$$ where the finxl inequality follows from a'plyung Beun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theordm 2.2]). By Megtens’ Theirem (xf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we hzye $$\layeo{brunexcept} X \krod_{q \leq Y^2} \neft(1 - \frac{1}{q}\rigvt) \lp \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$
Now, suppose that $k > 1$. On one hamd, for all $k > 1$, wg havt $$\lwbel{miew1} 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varlhi(d_l)}{\eln^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \keq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \lee Ye^{-(\pog X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On tje other habd, Lqnma \[cor2\] implkes that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Yg^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\uabel{yigohppracezcwpt} M\left(\frac{X}{(\lig X)^{\treta} \log \log X}\right)\etd{alignrd}$$ integers $n \keq X$. Dor such numbers $n$, foc all $i \geq 1$, we have $$\begin{alicnzd}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \gwq \frac{\gll^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{v} > \ffac{s_{j+m}}{Y s^{(\log X)^\hheva}} > \frac{d_j G^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\thwta}} = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k \qbd{aligned}$$ whede the igequalities follow, respectively, from Lekma \[l2\], Lemma \[cor2\] and the aswumption that there edists an yndex $j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combina the knewuwuutj from applied with $k = j$ with to show that $$1 + \fhm_{k \keq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \fvac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ | n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} X \leq Y^2} - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where applying Sieve (cf. [@hr 2.2]). By Mertens’ (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$ Now, suppose that > 1$. On one hand, for all $k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} + \leq \ell^*_p(d_l) = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the hand, Lemma \[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log but for $$\begin{aligned} \label{bigohppracexcept} X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers \leq For such $n$, all \geq 1$, we $$\begin{aligned} \label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} = Ye^{-(\log d_j \end{aligned}$$ inequalities follow, from \[l2\], \[cor2\] and the there exists an index $j$ for a result, we can combine the inequality from with $k j$ with to show that $$1 \sum_{l \leq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ | n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \fRac{1}{q}\right),$$ wHere tHe fInaL iNequAlitY follows from apPLyinG Brun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theorem 2.2]). by MerTeNS’ TheOReM (cf. [@poLlack ThEOrEM 3.15]), We hAvE $$\lAbeL{bRUnExcepT} X \pRod_{q \leq y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\RigHt) \Ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$
NOW, sUppose that $K > 1$. On One hand, for alL $k > 1$, wE have $$\lAbEl{lPEq1} 1 + \sum_{L \leQ k} \ell^*_P(d_l) \fraC{\Varphi(D_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sUm_{L \Leq k} \vaRPhi(d_l) \leQ K D_k \Leq YE^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the OThER hand, Lemma \[cor2\] iMplies ThAT $\eLL^*_P(n) > \fRac{x}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theTa}}$ But foR $$\Begin{alIGnED}
\LAbeL{BigohppracexcEpt} O\left(\fraC{x}{(\loG X)^{\thetA} \lOg \lOG X}\righT)\end{aLiGNed}$$ Integers $n \leQ X$. FoR such numbErs $n$, foR All $i \geq 1$, WE have $$\beGin{aliGneD}
\laBel{lPEq2} \ElL^*_p(d_{J+i}) \GEq \fRAc{\Ell^*_P(N) d_{j+I}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+I}}{Y E^{(\lOg X)^\thEta}} > \fRAC{D_J Y^2}{Y e^{(\Log x)^\theTa}} = Ye^{-(\lOg X)^\theta} d_j \end{AliGned}$$ WHerE the iNequaLitiEs FolloW, respeCtiveLy, From Lemma \[l2\], Lemma \[Cor2\] aNd the assuMptIoN thAt There EXists aN inDex $J$ for whiCh holds. aS a rEsULT, We Can combine the inequAlITY fRom appliEd with $K = J$ wItH To show thAt $$1 + \Sum_{L \leq J} \ELl^*_p(d_l) \Frac{\VArPhi(d_l)}{\ | n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \ prod_ {q\le qY^2} \le ft(1 - \frac{1 } {q}\ right),$$ where the fi nal i ne q uali t yfollo ws from ap p l yin gBr un’ sS ie ve (c f.[@hr Th eorem 2.2] ).By Mertens’ Th e or em (cf. [@ pol lack Theorem 3. 15]),we ha v e $$\ lab el{br unexce p t} X \ prod_{q \ le q Y^2}\ left(1- \f rac{ 1}{q}\right) \ll\ fr a c{X}{\log Y}.$ $
Now ,s up p o setha t $k > 1$. O n one hand, f o ra l l $k > 1$, we have $$\label{l p eq1 } 1 +\s um_ { l \leq k} \ el l ^*_ p(d_l) \fra c{\v arphi(d_l )}{\el l ^*_p(d_ l )} = 1+ \sum _{l \l eq k } \ va rph i( d _l) \l eqk d_ k \leq Y e^ {- (\log X)^ \ t h e ta}d_k .$$On th e other hand, Le mma\ [co r2\]impli es t ha t $\e ll^*_p (n) > \ frac{X}{Ye^{(\l og X )^\theta} }$bu t f or $$\b e gin{al ign ed}
\label {bigohp p rac ex c e p t} O\left(\frac{X}{( \l o g X )^{\thet a} \lo g \ lo g X}\righ t) \en d{al i g ned}$ $ in t eg ers $n \ leq X$ . F or such n um bers $ n$ , f orall $ i \ge q 1$,we have$$\be g in{aligned}
\l a bel{lpeq2} \e l l^ * _ p( d _{j+ i}) \geq \frac {\el l ^*_p (n)d _{ j+i } }{n}> \fr ac { d_ { j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X) ^\ theta} } > \ frac{d_j Y^2} {Y e^{(\lo g X )^\theta }} = Ye ^ {-(\log X)^\th eta}d_j \end{a l igned}$$ wher e the in equalitie s follow,res pec tiv ely , fr om Lemma \[l2 \ ] , Le mm a \[cor 2\] and th e a ssu mpt ion t hat there existsan i nd ex $j $ for which ho ld s.As aresul t , we c an co mbin eth e in equalit y f r o m ap pl ie d wi th$k = j$ wit h to show t hat $$1 + \s u m_{l \ le q j} \e ll^*_p(d_l) \ fr ac{\varphi (d _l) }{\ | n \leq_X \\_P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1_\ll X_\prod_{q_\leq Y^2}_\left(1_- \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where_the final inequality_follows from applying Brun’s_Sieve (cf. [@hr_Theorem_2.2]). By Mertens’ Theorem (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have $$\label{brunexcept} X \prod_{q \leq_Y^2}_\left(1 -_\frac{1}{q}\right)_\ll_\frac{X}{\log Y}.$$
Now, suppose that $k_> 1$. On one hand,_for all_$k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} 1 +_\sum_{l_\leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l)_\frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq_k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$_On the other_hand,_Lemma_\[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n)_> \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bigohppracexcept}_O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers_$n \leq X$. For such numbers $n$,_for all $i \geq 1$, we_have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n)_d_{j+i}}{n} >_\frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j_Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}}_= Ye^{-(\log_X)^\theta} d_j \end{aligned}$$_where the inequalities follow, respectively, from_Lemma \[l2\], Lemma_\[cor2\] and the assumption that there_exists_an index $j$_for_which_holds. As_a result, we_can_combine the_inequality_from applied with $k = j$_with_to show that $$1 + \sum_{l \leq_j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ |
{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ such that for all $a, b \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ we have: $
\omega(a, b) = \omega_K(a, b) := {\mathsf{tr}}(K^t \cdot \bigl([a, b]\bigr).$ Let $1 \le e \le n$ be such that $\gcd(n, e) = 1$. Then the parabolic subalgebra $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ is Frobenius. If $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)$ is a Stolin triple then $\omega_K$ has to define a Frobenius pairing on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$. If $K' \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ is any other matrix such that $\omega_{K'}$ is non-degenerate on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \times \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ then the triples $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega_{K})$ and $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega_{K'})$ define gauge equivalent solutions of the classical Yang–Baxter equation. This means that the gauge equivalence class of the solution $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)}$ does not depend on a particular choice of $\omega$! However, in order to get nice closed formulae for $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)}$, we actually need the canonical matrix $J_{(e, d)} \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ constructed by recursion (\[E:formcanonique\]).
From vector bundles to the cuspidal Weierstraß curve to Stolin triples
======================================================================
For reader’s convenience, we recall once again our notation.
- $E$ is the cuspidal Weierstraß curve.
- $(e, d)$ is a pair of positive coprime e integers and $n = e + d$.
- $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{a}}= \mathfrak{gl}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \subset \operatorname{\ | { \mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ such that for all $ a, b \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ we have: $
\omega(a, b) = \omega_K(a, b): = { \mathsf{tr}}(K^t \cdot \bigl([a, b]\bigr).$ Let $ 1 \le e \le n$ be such that $ \gcd(n, e) = 1$. Then the parabolic subalgebra $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ is Frobenius. If $ (\operatorname{\mathfrak{g } }, e, \omega)$ is a Stolin triple then $ \omega_K$ take to specify a Frobenius pairing on $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$. If $ K' \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ is any other matrix such that $ \omega_{K'}$ is non - debauched on $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \times \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ then the triples $ (\operatorname{\mathfrak{g } }, e, \omega_{K})$ and $ (\operatorname{\mathfrak{g } }, e, \omega_{K'})$ define gauge equivalent solutions of the authoritative Yang – Baxter equality. This means that the gauge equivalence class of the solution $ r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g } }, e, \omega)}$ does not depend on a finical choice of $ \omega$! However, in order to draw nice closed formulae for $ r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g } }, e, \omega)}$, we actually need the canonical matrix $ J_{(e, d) } \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ constructed by recursion (\[E: formcanonique\ ]).
From vector bundles to the cuspidal Weierstraß curvature to Stolin triples
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
For reader ’s convenience, we echo once again our notation.
- $ E$ is the cuspidal Weierstraß curve.
- $ (e, d)$ is a couple of positive coprime einsteinium integers and $ n = e + d$.
- $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{a}}= \mathfrak{gl}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \subset \operatorname{\ | {\matjsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ smch that for all $a, b \in \operaforname{\mxthfrak{g}}$ we have: $
\omega(a, b) = \lmwga_K(a, b) := {\mathsf{tr}}(K^t \cdot \biel([a, b]\bigr).$ Let $1 \le e \lt n$ be such that $\jdd(n, e) = 1$. Then fme paxauolic subalgebrs $\operatortame{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ ir Yrobenius. If $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)$ os a Stolin tripje tnqn $\ojvgc_K$ has to define a Frobenius pajring oi $\operatorname{\msthfrak{p}}_e$. If $K' \in \operatorjame{\lathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\lathbb{C}})$ is qny jrher matrix ruch that $\omega_{K'}$ is noh-degenerate on $\operatorname{\mathwrak{p}}_z \times \opetcrorjdme{\mathfrak{'}}_e$ theg the triples $(\operatmrname{\msthfrak{g}}, e, \omena_{K})$ aid $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, x, \omega_{K'})$ define gaugg equivalett solutions of the coassiwal Fang–Cqxtdr tquetikn. Thid mxans that tge gauge eqyivalence class of uhe wolution $r_{(\opedatornwmq{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)}$ does not depend on a padticular choice of $\omegq$! However, in order to get nice closed formulae for $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omeca)}$, we xctbqlly vwef the canonical matrix $J_{(e, d)} \in \operatorname{\maegsg{Mst}}_{n \times n}({\matmbb{C}})$ constructed bu gevorsion (\[E:formcavoniquz\]).
Rrkm vector bundles ho the suspieal Weierftraß curve to Stolin triples
======================================================================
For reader’s conneniwnce, we recall oncz again our uotatipn.
- $R$ is the cuspidal Weierrtraß curve.
- $(e, f)$ is a pajf of positive coorike e integtfs and $n = e + d$.
- $\jperatorneme{\machfrak{g}}= \uperstornaie{\mathfrak{dl}}_n({\mabvbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mwthfrck{a}}= \mdthfrak{gl}_n({\lathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}= \o'xratorname{\matnfsak{i}}_e \subset \operstorname{\ | {\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ such that for all \in we have: \omega(a, b) = \bigl([a, Let $1 \le \le n$ be that $\gcd(n, e) = 1$. Then parabolic subalgebra $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ is Frobenius. If $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)$ is a Stolin triple $\omega_K$ has to define a Frobenius pairing on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$. If $K' \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n n}({\mathbb{C}})$ any matrix that $\omega_{K'}$ is non-degenerate on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \times \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ then the triples $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega_{K})$ and $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, \omega_{K'})$ define gauge equivalent solutions of the classical equation. This means that gauge equivalence class of the $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, \omega)}$ does depend a choice of $\omega$! in order to get nice closed formulae for $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)}$, we actually need the canonical matrix d)} \in n}({\mathbb{C}})$ constructed recursion From bundles to the curve to Stolin triples ====================================================================== For recall once again our notation. - $E$ is cuspidal Weierstraß - $(e, d)$ is a pair positive coprime e integers and $n = e d$. - $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{a}}= \mathfrak{gl}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \subset \operatorname{\ | {\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$ suCh that for aLl $a, b \iN \opEraToRnamE{\matHfrak{g}}$ we have: $
\omEGa(a, b) = \Omega_K(a, b) := {\mathsf{tr}}(K^t \cdot \Bigl([a, B]\bIGr).$ LeT $1 \Le E \le n$ bE such thAT $\gCD(N, e) = 1$. THeN tHe pArABoLic suBalGebra $\opEratorname{\MatHfRak{p}}_e$ is FrobeNIuS. If $(\operatoRnaMe{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \OmeGa)$ is a SToLin TRiple TheN $\omegA_K$ has tO Define A FrobeniuS pAIring oN $\OperatoRNAmE{\matHfrak{p}}_e$. If $K' \in \operaTOrNAme{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \tImes n}({\mAtHBb{c}})$ IS anY otHer matrix sUcH that $\OMega_{K'}$ is NOn-DEGEneRAte on $\operatorName{\mathfraK{P}}_e \tImes \opErAtoRName{\maThfraK{p}}_E$ TheN the triples $(\OperAtorname{\mAthfraK{G}}, e, \omega_{k})$ And $(\operAtornaMe{\mAthFrak{G}}, E, \oMeGa_{K'})$ DeFIne GAuGe eQUivAlent solUtIoNs of tHe clASSICal YAng–baxtEr equAtion. This meanS thAt thE GauGe equIvaleNce cLaSs of tHe soluTion $r_{(\OpEratorname{\mathfRak{g}}, E, \omega)}$ doeS noT dEpeNd On a paRTiculaR chOicE of $\omegA$! HoweveR, In oRdER TO gEt nice closed formulAe FOR $r_{(\OperatorName{\maTHfRaK{G}}, e, \omega)}$, wE aCtuAlly NEEd the CanoNIcAl matrix $j_{(e, d)} \in \oPErAtOrname{\mAtHsf{Mat}}_{N \tImeS n}({\mAthbb{c}})$ ConsTructeD by recurSion (\[E:FOrmcanonique\]).
FrOM vector bundleS To THE cUSpidAl WEierstraß cuRve tO stolIn trIPlEs
======================================================================
FOR readEr’s coNvENiENce, we recall once agaiN oUr notaTion.
- $E$ Is the cuspidal weierstraß CURVe.
- $(e, d)$ is a pAir oF PoSItive coprime e iNtegeRs and $n = e + d$.
- $\opERatornamE{\mathFrak{g}}= \opeRatorname{\MAThfrak{sl}}_N({\maThbB{C}})$, $\oPerATOrName{\mathfrak{a}}= \MAThfrAk{Gl}_n({\mathBb{C}})$, $\OperatoRnaMe{\mAthFraK{p}}= \OperatornAme{\mathfRaK{p}}_E \sUbSet \OperaTOrname{\ | {\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n }({\mathbb {C}}) $ s uch t hatforall $a, b \in\ oper atorname{\mathfrak{g}} $ weha v e: $ \ omega (a, b)= \ o m ega _K (a , b ): ={\mat hsf {tr}}(K ^t \cdot \ big l( [a, b]\bigr) . $Let $1 \le e\le n$ be su chthat $ \g cd( n , e)= 1 $. Th en the parabo lic subal ge b ra $\o p eratorn a m e{ \mat hfrak{p}}_e$ is F r ob e nius. If $(\op erator na m e{ \ m ath fra k{g}}, e,\o mega) $ is a S t ol i n tri p le then $\ome ga_K$ has t o de fine a F rob e nius p airin go n $ \operatorna me{\ mathfrak{ p}}_e$ . If $K' \in \op erator nam e{\ math s f{ Ma t}} _{ n \t i me s n } ({\ mathbb{C }} )$ is a ny o t h e r mat rix suc h tha t $\omega_{K' }$is n o n-d egene rateon $ \o perat orname {\mat hf rak{p}}_e \time s \o peratorna me{ \m ath fr ak{p} } _e$ th enthe triple s $(\op e rat or n a m e{ \mathfrak{g}}, e,\o m e ga _{K})$ a nd $(\ o pe ra t orname{\ ma thf rak{ g } }, e, \om e ga _{K'})$define ga ug e equiv al ent so lu tio nsof th e cla ssical Yang–Ba xtere quation. Thism eans that the ga u g ee quiv ale nce class o f th e sol utio n $ r_{ ( \oper atorn am e {\ m athfrak{g}}, e, \om eg a)}$ d oes n ot depend ona particul a r choice o f $\ o me g a$! However, i n ord er to getn ice clos ed fo rmulae f or $r_{(\ o p eratorna me{ \ma thf rak { g }} , e, \omega)} $ , weac tuallynee d the c ano nic almat ri x $J_{(e, d)} \in \ op er at orn ame{\ m athsf{Ma t} }_{ n\ti mes n } ({\mat hbb{C }})$ c on s tru cted by re c u rsio n(\ [E:f orm ca noniq ue\] ) .
From ve ctor bund les to t he c uspidal Weierstraß c ur ve to Stol in tr iples= = ======== ======================= = ======= === ===== ==== ========= === =====
Fo r reade r’s co nveni en ce, w e rec a l lonc eagain ourn o tat ion.
- $ E$ is t he cuspidal Weiers t raß curve.
- $(e , d) $ is ap ai r of p o sit i v e coprime e int egers and$n =e + d$.
- $ \o perator name{\m athfr a k{g}}=\operator name{\mat hf rak{ s l }}_ n({\mathbb {C}})$,$\operato r name{ \ ma thfra k{a }}= \m at hfr ak{gl }_n({\ m ath bb{C} })$, $ \o perato rname {\ mathfrak {p}}= \operatorname{\ma thfrak {p}}_ e \ subset \o per a tor name{\ | {\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times_n}({\mathbb{C}})$ such_that for all $a,_b \in_\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$_we have:_$
_\omega(a, b) =_\omega_K(a, b) :=_{\mathsf{tr}}(K^t \cdot \bigl([a, b]\bigr).$_Let $1 \le_e_\le n$ be such that $\gcd(n, e) = 1$. Then the parabolic subalgebra $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$_is_Frobenius. If_$(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}},_e,_\omega)$ is a Stolin triple_then $\omega_K$ has to define_a Frobenius_pairing on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$. If $K' \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times_n}({\mathbb{C}})$_is any other_matrix such that $\omega_{K'}$ is non-degenerate on $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \times_\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e$ then the triples $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e,_\omega_{K})$ and $(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}},_e,_\omega_{K'})$_define gauge equivalent solutions_of the classical Yang–Baxter equation. This_means that the gauge equivalence class_of the solution $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}, e, \omega)}$ does_not depend on a particular choice_of $\omega$! However, in order_to get_nice closed formulae for $r_{(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}},_e, \omega)}$, we_actually need_the canonical matrix_$J_{(e, d)} \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{n \times n}({\mathbb{C}})$_constructed by recursion_(\[E:formcanonique\]).
From vector bundles to the cuspidal_Weierstraß_curve to Stolin_triples
======================================================================
For_reader’s_convenience, we_recall once again_our_notation.
- __$E$ is the cuspidal Weierstraß curve.
-__ $(e, d)$ is a pair of_positive coprime e integers_and_$n = e +_d$.
- $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}_n({\mathbb{C}})$,_$\operatorname{\mathfrak{a}}= \mathfrak{gl}_n({\mathbb{C}})$, $\operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}= \operatorname{\mathfrak{p}}_e \subset \operatorname{\ |
$ does not have fixed components, we get $K_{W} \cdot \Sigma \leqslant 0$ and hence $m \leqslant 2 + Z^{2}$.
Moreover, if $Z$ is the tautological section on $V \simeq \mathbb{F}_{n}$, $n \geqslant 0$, then $Z^{2} = n$ and $$K_{W} \cdot \Sigma = g^{*}(K_{V} + c_{1}(\mathcal{E})) \cdot \Sigma = (K_{V} + c_{1}(\mathcal{E})) \cdot Z = -n - 2 + c_{1}(\mathcal{E}) \cdot Z.$$ From we obtain $m = c_{1}(\mathcal{E}) \cdot Z$.
Recall that by Remark \[remark:minimal-rational-base\] we have either $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{F}_{n}$ where $n \in \{0,2,3,4\}$. We will show that each of these cases is impossible.
\[theorem:P-2-case\] In the above notation and assumptions, we have $V \ne \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
Suppose that $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
We have $H^{2i}(\mathbb{P}^{2}, \mathbb{Z}) \simeq \mathbb{Z}$, $i=1$, $2$. Hence we may assume that $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are integers. Then by Lemma \[theorem:estimate-for-1-class\] $0 \leqslant c_{1} \leqslant 9$.
\[theorem:non-decomposable\] In the above notation, the rank $2$ vector bundle $\mathcal{E}$ is not decomposable.
Suppose that $\mathcal{E}$ is decomposable. Then $\mathcal{E} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a+b)$ for some $b \geqslant 0$. Since $H$ is nef we also have $a \geqslant 0$.
Furthermore, we have $c_{1} = 2a + b$ and $c_{2} = a^{2}+ab$. Thus, from we get $$\chi(V,\mathcal{E}) = \frac{1}{2}\left(2 | $ does not have fixed components, we get $ K_{W } \cdot \Sigma \leqslant 0 $ and therefore $ m \leqslant 2 + Z^{2}$.
furthermore, if $ Z$ is the pleonastic section on $ V \simeq \mathbb{F}_{n}$, $ n \geqslant 0 $, then $ Z^{2 } = n$ and $ $ K_{W } \cdot \Sigma = g^{*}(K_{V } + c_{1}(\mathcal{E }) ) \cdot \Sigma = (K_{V } + c_{1}(\mathcal{E }) ) \cdot omega = -n - 2 + c_{1}(\mathcal{E }) \cdot Z.$$ From we obtain $ m = c_{1}(\mathcal{E }) \cdot Z$.
Recall that by Remark \[remark: minimal - rational - base\ ] we hold either $ V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $ \mathbb{F}_{n}$ where $ n \in \{0,2,3,4\}$. We will prove that each of these cases is impossible.
\[theorem: P-2 - case\ ] In the above notation and assumption, we have $ V \ne \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
Suppose that $ vanadium = \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
We accept $ H^{2i}(\mathbb{P}^{2 }, \mathbb{Z }) \simeq \mathbb{Z}$, $ i=1 $, $ 2$. Hence we may assume that $ c_{1}$ and $ c_{2}$ are integers. Then by Lemma \[theorem: estimate - for-1 - class\ ] $ 0 \leqslant c_{1 } \leqslant 9$.
\[theorem: non - decomposable\ ] In the above notation, the rank and file $ 2 $ vector bundle $ \mathcal{E}$ is not decomposable.
Suppose that $ \mathcal{E}$ is analyzable. Then $ \mathcal{E } \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a+b)$ for some $ b \geqslant 0$. Since $ H$ is nef we also have $ a \geqslant 0$.
Furthermore, we receive $ c_{1 } = 2a + b$ and $ c_{2 } = a^{2}+ab$. therefore, from we get $ $ \chi(V,\mathcal{E }) = \frac{1}{2}\left(2 | $ dofs not have fixed compontnts, we get $K_{W} \cdot \Sigme \leqslznt 0$ and hence $m \leqslant 2 + Z^{2}$.
Moreovec, if $Z$ is the tautological sectkon on $V \dimeq \marhbb{H}_{n}$, $n \geqslant 0$, tisn $Z^{2} = n$ and $$K_{S} \cdoc \Wigma = g^{*}(K_{V} + c_{1}(\msthcal{E})) \cdmt \Sigma = (K_{V} + w_{1}(\mxtkcal{E})) \cdot Z = -n - 2 + c_{1}(\mathcal{E}) \cdot Z.$$ Srom we ohtain $m = c_{1}(\mathsal{E}) \sdot D$.
Rtcall that by Remark \[remark:minimal-dationan-base\] we have either $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathhb{F}_{n}$ where $n \in \{0,2,3,4\}$. We wipl show thaj easy of these cxses is imkovsible.
\[theotem:P-2-case\] In the above notation avd asxumptions, qe hagg $V \ne \mathbu{P}^{2}$.
Suppjse that $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
Wa have $N^{2i}(\mathbb{P}^{2}, \mathnb{Z}) \smmeq \mathbb{Z}$, $i=1$, $2$. Hence we kay assume that $c_{1}$ wnd $c_{2}$ are iutegers. Then by Lemma \[rhworem:gstimdte-fue-1-clxss\] $0 \kesslant c_{1} \meqslant 9$.
\[tgeorem:non-dexomposable\] In the anodv notation, ths rank $2$ dector bundle $\mathcal{E}$ is not decomposatle.
Auppose that $\mathcal{E}$ iw decomposable. Then $\mwthcal{E} \symeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a+b)$ for some $c \gtqwlant 0$. Slnce $H$ is nef we also have $a \geqslant 0$.
Furtherikrt, wv have $c_{1} = 2a + b$ anb $c_{2} = a^{2}+ab$. Thus, frpm wr get $$\chi(V,\mathzal{E}) = \ydad{1}{2}\left(2 | $ does not have fixed components, we \cdot \leqslant 0$ hence $m \leqslant $Z$ the tautological section $V \simeq \mathbb{F}_{n}$, \geqslant 0$, then $Z^{2} = n$ $$K_{W} \cdot \Sigma = g^{*}(K_{V} + c_{1}(\mathcal{E})) \cdot \Sigma = (K_{V} + c_{1}(\mathcal{E})) Z = -n - 2 + c_{1}(\mathcal{E}) \cdot Z.$$ From we obtain $m c_{1}(\mathcal{E}) Z$. that Remark \[remark:minimal-rational-base\] we have either $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{F}_{n}$ where $n \in \{0,2,3,4\}$. We will that each of these cases is impossible. \[theorem:P-2-case\] the above notation and we have $V \ne \mathbb{P}^{2}$. that = \mathbb{P}^{2}$. have \mathbb{Z}) \mathbb{Z}$, $i=1$, $2$. we may assume that $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are integers. Then by Lemma \[theorem:estimate-for-1-class\] $0 \leqslant c_{1} \leqslant \[theorem:non-decomposable\] In notation, the $2$ bundle is not decomposable. $\mathcal{E}$ is decomposable. Then $\mathcal{E} \simeq for some $b \geqslant 0$. Since $H$ is we also $a \geqslant 0$. Furthermore, we have = 2a + b$ and $c_{2} = a^{2}+ab$. from we get $$\chi(V,\mathcal{E}) = \frac{1}{2}\left(2 | $ does not have fixed componentS, we get $K_{W} \cdOt \SigMa \lEqsLaNt 0$ anD henCe $m \leqslant 2 + Z^{2}$.
MoREoveR, if $Z$ is the tautological sEctioN oN $v \simEQ \mAthbb{f}_{n}$, $n \geqsLAnT 0$, THen $z^{2} = n$ AnD $$K_{W} \CdOT \SIgma = g^{*}(k_{V} + c_{1}(\Mathcal{e})) \cdot \Sigma = (k_{V} + c_{1}(\MaThcal{E})) \cdot Z = -n - 2 + C_{1}(\MaThcal{E}) \cdot z.$$ FrOm we obtain $m = c_{1}(\MatHcal{E}) \cDoT Z$.
RECall tHat By RemArk \[remARk:miniMal-rationAl-BAse\] we hAVe eitheR $v = \MaThbb{p}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{F}_{n}$ where $n \IN \{0,2,3,4\}$. WE Will show that eaCh of thEsE CaSES is ImpOssible.
\[theOrEm:P-2-caSE\] In the aBOvE NOTatIOn and assumptiOns, we have $V \nE \MatHbb{P}^{2}$.
SuPpOse THat $V = \maThbb{P}^{2}$.
we HAve $h^{2i}(\mathbb{P}^{2}, \maThbb{z}) \simeq \matHbb{Z}$, $i=1$, $2$. HENce we maY Assume tHat $c_{1}$ anD $c_{2}$ aRe iNtegERs. thEn bY LEMma \[THeOreM:EstImate-for-1-ClAsS\] $0 \leqsLant C_{1} \LEQSlanT 9$.
\[thEoreM:non-dEcomposable\] In The AbovE NotAtion, The raNk $2$ veCtOr bunDle $\matHcal{E}$ Is Not decomposable.
suppOse that $\maThcAl{e}$ is DeCompoSAble. ThEn $\mAthCal{E} \simEq \mathcAL{O}_{\mAtHBB{p}^{2}}(a) \Oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbB{P}^{2}}(A+B)$ FoR some $b \geQslant 0$. sInCe $h$ Is nef we aLsO haVe $a \gEQSlant 0$.
furtHErMore, we haVe $c_{1} = 2a + b$ aND $c_{2} = A^{2}+aB$. Thus, frOm We get $$\cHi(v,\maThcAl{E}) = \frAC{1}{2}\lefT(2 | $ does not have fixed comp onents, we get$K_ {W} \ cdot \Si gma \leqslant0 $ an d hence $m \leqslant 2 + Z^ {2 } $.
M or eover , if $Z $ i s the t au tol og i ca l sec tio n on $V \simeq \m ath bb {F}_{n}$, $n \g eqslant 0$ , t hen $Z^{2} = n$ and $ $K _{W } \cdo t \ Sigma = g^{ * }(K_{V } + c_{1} (\ m athcal { E})) \c d o t\Sig ma = (K_{V} + c_{ 1 }( \ mathcal{E})) \ cdot Z = -n - 2+ c _{1}(\math ca l{E}) \cdot Z . $$ F r omw e obtain $m = c_{1}(\mat h cal {E}) \ cd otZ $.
Re callth a t b y Remark \[ rema rk:minima l-rati o nal-bas e \] we h ave ei the r $ V =\ ma th bb{ P} ^ {2} $ o r $ \ mat hbb{F}_{ n} $where $n\ i n \{0, 2,3 ,4\} $. We will show th ateach ofthese case s is i mposs ible.
\[th eo rem:P-2-case\]In t he abovenot at ion a nd as s umptio ns, we have $ V \ne \ m ath bb { P } ^{ 2}$.
Suppose that $ V =\mathbb{ P}^{2} $ .
W e have $H ^{ 2i} (\ma t h bb{P} ^{2} , \ mathbb{Z }) \si m eq \ mathbb{ Z} $, $i= 1$ , $ 2$. Henc e wemay as sume tha t $c_ { 1}$ and $c_{2} $ are integers . T h e nb y Le mma \[theorem: esti m ate- for- 1 -c las s \] $0 \leq sl a nt c_{1} \leqslant 9$.
\[theo rem:n on-decomposab le\] In th e a bove not atio n ,t he rank $2$ ve ctorbundle $\m a thcal{E} $ isnot deco mposable. Supposetha t $ \ma thc a l {E }$ is decompo s a ble. T hen $\m ath cal{E}\si meq \m ath ca l{O}_{\ma thbb{P}^ {2 }} (a )\op lus \ m athcal{O }_ {\m at hbb {P}^{ 2 }}(a+b )$ fo r so me $ b \g eqslant 0$ . Sinc e$H $ is ne fwe al so h a ve$a \geq slant 0$.
F u rthe rm or e, we h ave $c_{1} =2a + b$ and$c _{2 } = a^ { 2 }+ab$. T hus, from we get $$\chi ( V,\math cal {E})= \f rac{1}{2} \le ft(2 | $ does_not have_fixed components, we get_$K_{W} \cdot_\Sigma_\leqslant 0$_and_hence $m \leqslant_2 + Z^{2}$.
Moreover,_if $Z$ is the_tautological section on_$V_\simeq \mathbb{F}_{n}$, $n \geqslant 0$, then $Z^{2} = n$ and $$K_{W} \cdot \Sigma =_g^{*}(K_{V}_+ c_{1}(\mathcal{E}))_\cdot_\Sigma_= (K_{V} + c_{1}(\mathcal{E})) \cdot_Z = -n - 2_+ c_{1}(\mathcal{E})_\cdot Z.$$ From we obtain $m = c_{1}(\mathcal{E})_\cdot_Z$.
Recall that by_Remark \[remark:minimal-rational-base\] we have either $V = \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{F}_{n}$_where $n \in \{0,2,3,4\}$. We will_show that each_of_these_cases is impossible.
\[theorem:P-2-case\] In_the above notation and assumptions, we_have $V \ne \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
Suppose that $V_= \mathbb{P}^{2}$.
We have $H^{2i}(\mathbb{P}^{2}, \mathbb{Z}) \simeq \mathbb{Z}$,_$i=1$, $2$. Hence we may assume_that $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are_integers. Then_by Lemma \[theorem:estimate-for-1-class\] $0 \leqslant c_{1}_\leqslant 9$.
\[theorem:non-decomposable\] In_the above_notation, the rank_$2$ vector bundle $\mathcal{E}$ is not_decomposable.
Suppose that $\mathcal{E}$_is decomposable. Then $\mathcal{E} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a)_\oplus_\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(a+b)$ for some_$b_\geqslant_0$. Since_$H$ is nef_we_also have_$a_\geqslant 0$.
Furthermore, we have $c_{1} =_2a_+ b$ and $c_{2} = a^{2}+ab$. Thus,_from we get $$\chi(V,\mathcal{E})_=_\frac{1}{2}\left(2 |
)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]] \\
= (N-1){{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[{\mathds{1}}\!\left(1\in I_{t-1} \right) {{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]].\end{gathered}$$ The inner conditional expectation can be computed as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{eq:cruce:h2-inner}
{{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ] \\
=\sum_{k,\ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\ell} {\mathds{1}}\!\left(k=\ell=1\right) \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^k, x_t ))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k) \\
= P_{t-1}^{11} \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\
\geq \frac{g_{t-1}(x_{t-1}^1) g_{t-1}(\tilde x_{t-1}^1) }{(N\bar{g})^2} \left( \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t )) f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \right)^2,\end{gathered}$$ where we have again used Assumptions \[assumption:upperbound\] and \[assumption:couplingmatrix\]. Note that this expression is independent of the final states of the reference trajectories, $(x_t, \tilde x | ) ^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1 } ] ] \\
= (N-1){{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0: t},\tilde x_{0: t}}}[{\mathds{1}}\!\left(1\in I_{t-1 } \right) { { \mathbb{E}}_{x_{0: t},\tilde x_{0: t } } } [ { \mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0: t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1 } ] ] .\end{gathered}$$ The inner conditional expectation can be computed as $ $ \begin{gathered }
\label{eq: cruce: h2 - inner }
{ { \mathbb{E}}_{x_{0: t},\tilde x_{0: t } } } [ { \mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0: t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1 } ] \\
= \sum_{k,\ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\ell } { \mathds{1}}\!\left(k=\ell=1\right) \int \psi_t((x_{0: t-1}^k, x_t) ) ^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k) \\
= P_{t-1}^{11 } \int \psi_t((x_{0: t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\
\geq \frac{g_{t-1}(x_{t-1}^1) g_{t-1}(\tilde x_{t-1}^1) } { (N\bar{g})^2 } \left (\int \psi_t((x_{0: t-1}^1, x_t) ) f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \right)^2,\end{gathered}$$ where we have again use Assumptions \[assumption: upperbound\ ] and \[assumption: couplingmatrix\ ]. notice that this expression is independent of the concluding states of the reference book trajectories, $ (x_t, \tilde x | )^2 \mif \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]] \\
= (N-1){{\mathbn{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[{\mathbw{1}}\!\left(1\ii I_{t-1} \rifht) {{\mathcb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \vildw a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \matfcal{F}_{t-1} ]].\ejd{gatherwd}$$ Tie inner conditional expcetatikk can ue computed as $$\negin{gatherad}
\label{eq:csuze:k2-inner}
{{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\lest(a_{t-1}^1 = \tolfe a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \ksi_t(x_{0:u}^1)^2 \myd \mznhgal{F}_{t-1} ] \\
=\sum_{k,\ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\ell} {\mathda{1}}\!\left(k=\enl=1\right) \int \pxi_t((x_{0:t-1}^k, x_t ))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k) \\
= P_{t-1}^{11} \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\
\geq \frax{g_{t-1}(x_{e-1}^1) g_{t-1}(\tilde x_{t-1}^1) }{(V\bar{g})^2} \left( \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, s_t )) f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \right)^2,\end{gathered}$$ whefe we have agaib ysef Assumptionw \[asslmption:upperbound\] and \[assumpyion:couplingmabrix\]. Iote that this expression is independent of the finan atates of the refwrwnce jrajewtorkws, $(b_t, \uilve s | )^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]] \\ = (N-1){{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde \right) x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = ]].\end{gathered}$$ inner conditional expectation be computed as \label{eq:cruce:h2-inner} {{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 = \tilde = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ] \\ =\sum_{k,\ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\ell} {\mathds{1}}\!\left(k=\ell=1\right) \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^k, ))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k) \\ = P_{t-1}^{11} \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\ \geq \frac{g_{t-1}(x_{t-1}^1) g_{t-1}(\tilde }{(N\bar{g})^2} \int x_t f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \right)^2,\end{gathered}$$ where we have again used Assumptions \[assumption:upperbound\] and \[assumption:couplingmatrix\]. Note that this expression is of the final states of the reference trajectories, \tilde x | )^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]] \\
= (N-1){{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilDe x_{0:t}}}[{\mathds{1}}\!\Left(1\iN I_{t-1} \RigHt) {{\MathBb{E}}_{x_{0:T},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\LEft(a_{T-1}^1 = \tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \MathcAl{f}_{T-1} ]].\end{GAtHered}$$ the inneR CoNDItiOnAl ExpEcTAtIon caN be ComputeD as $$\begin{gaTheReD}
\label{eq:crucE:H2-iNner}
{{\mathbb{e}}_{x_{0:t},\Tilde x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathdS{1}}\!\leFt(a_{t-1}^1 = \tiLdE a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \RIght) \pSi_t(X_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \MathcaL{f}_{t-1} ] \\
=\sum_{k,\Ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\elL} {\mAThds{1}}\!\leFT(k=\ell=1\riGHT) \iNt \psI_t((x_{0:t-1}^k, x_t ))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k) \\
= P_{t-1}^{11} \iNT \pSI_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\
\geQ \frac{g_{T-1}(x_{T-1}^1) G_{t-1}(\TILde X_{t-1}^1) }{(N\Bar{g})^2} \left( \inT \pSi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, X_T )) f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \RIgHT)^2,\ENd{gAThered}$$ where we Have again usED AsSumptiOnS \[asSUmptioN:uppeRbOUnd\] And \[assumptiOn:coUplingmatRix\]. NotE That thiS ExpressIon is iNdePenDent OF tHe FinAl STatES oF thE RefErence trAjEcTorieS, $(x_t, \tILDE X | )^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]] \\
= (N -1) {{\ ma thbb {E}} _{x_{0:t},\til d e x_ {0:t}}}[{\mathds{1}}\! \left (1 \ in I _ {t -1} \ right){ {\ m a thb b{ E} }_{ x_ { 0: t},\t ild e x_{0: t}}}[ {\ma thd s{ 1}}\!\left(a _ {t -1}^1 = \t ild e a_{t-1}^1= 1 \righ t) \p s i_t(x _{0 :t}^1 )^2 \m i d \mat hcal{F}_{ t- 1 } ]]. \ end{gat h e re d}$$ The inner condit i on a l expectationcan be c o mp u t edas$$\begin{g at hered }
\l a be l { e q:c r uce:h2-inner}
{{\mat h bb{ E}}_{x _{ 0:t } ,\tild e x_{ 0: t }}} [ {\mathds{ 1}}\ !\left(a_ {t-1}^ 1 = \til d e a_{t- 1}^1 = 1\ri ght) \p si _t( x_ { 0:t } ^1 )^2 \mi d \mathc al {F }_{t- 1} ] \ \ =\s um_{ k,\el l=1}^N P_{t-1 }^{ k\el l } { \math ds{1} }\!\ le ft(k= \ell=1 \righ t) \int \psi_t((x _{0: t-1}^k, x _t)) ^2f( dx_t| x _{t-1} ^k) \\
=P_{t-1} ^ {11 }\ i n t\psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^ 1, x _t ))^2 f(d x_t|x_ { t- 1} ^ 1) \\
\ge q \f r a c{g_{ t-1} ( x_ {t-1}^1) g_{t- 1 }( \t ilde x_ {t -1}^1) } {(N \ba r{g}) ^ 2} \ left(\int \ps i_t(( x _{0:t-1}^1, x_ t )) f(dx_t|x_ { t- 1 } ^1 ) \ri ght )^2,\end{ga ther e d}$$ whe r eweh ave a gainus e dA ssumptions \[assump ti on:upp erbou nd\] and \[as sumption:c o u p lingmatr ix\] . N o te that this e xpres sion is in d ependent of t he final states o f the refe ren cetra jec t o ri es, $(x_t, \t i l de x | )^2 \mid_\mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]]_\\
_= (N-1){{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde_x_{0:t}}}[{\mathds{1}}\!\left(1\in_I_{t-1} \right)_{{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde_x_{0:t}}}[ {\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1 =_\tilde a_{t-1}^1 =_1 \right) \psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid_\mathcal{F}_{t-1} ]].\end{gathered}$$_The_inner conditional expectation can be computed as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{eq:cruce:h2-inner}
__{{\mathbb{E}}_{x_{0:t},\tilde x_{0:t}}}[_{\mathds{1}}\!\left(a_{t-1}^1_=_\tilde a_{t-1}^1 = 1 \right)_\psi_t(x_{0:t}^1)^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1} ] \\
_ _ =\sum_{k,\ell=1}^N P_{t-1}^{k\ell} {\mathds{1}}\!\left(k=\ell=1\right) \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^k, x_t ))^2_f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^k)_\\
_ = P_{t-1}^{11} \int \psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1, x_t))^2 f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \\
_ \geq \frac{g_{t-1}(x_{t-1}^1) g_{t-1}(\tilde x_{t-1}^1)_}{(N\bar{g})^2} \left( \int_\psi_t((x_{0:t-1}^1,_x_t_)) f(dx_t|x_{t-1}^1) \right)^2,\end{gathered}$$ where_we have again used Assumptions \[assumption:upperbound\]_and \[assumption:couplingmatrix\]. Note that this expression_is independent of the final states of_the reference trajectories, $(x_t, \tilde x |
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);
(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);
at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};
Note that using determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent to the determinantal formula by applying the Cauchy-Binet formula indexed by partitions.
We will perform one more transformation of the lattice grid (now with some negative weights) whose nonintersecting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$.
Consider the new [*Type 3*]{} lattice grid as in Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentially the same as the Type 2 grid, but diagonal steps in its 1st quadrant have negative weights $-\alpha$ and all right steps in 4th quadrant have weight $\alpha + \beta$. Points $A_i$ have the same coordinates, but the points $B_i$ on the right half-plane move again as in Type 1 lattice grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $(i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.
By the following two cases we obtain that $$w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, then $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j - \ | (-1,-2) to (-1,-2 + 1) to (-1 + 1,-2 + 1) to (-1 + 1,-2 + 1 + 1);
(2,-4) to (2,-4 + 2); (2,-4 + 2) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1); (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1 + 3) to (2 + 1 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1);
at (-3.5,-3.5) [ $ \alpha + \beta$ ] { }; at (4.3,-3.5) [ $ \alpha + \beta$ ] { }; at (-4.5,2.5) [ $ \alpha$ ] { }; at (2.0,2.5) [ $ -\alpha$ ] { };
Note that using determinantal formulas, , the formula is equivalent to the determinantal rule by enforce the Cauchy - Binet formula index by partition.
We will perform one more transformation of the lattice power system (now with some negative weights) whose nonintersecting way system compute the same function $ f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$.
Consider the new [ * Type 3 * ] { } wicket grid as in Figure \[fig333\ ]. Which is essentially the same as the Type 2 power system, but diagonal steps in its 1st quadrant have negative weight $ -\alpha$ and all right steps in 4th quadrant have weight $ \alpha + \beta$. Points $ A_i$ own the same coordinates, but the points $ B_i$ on the right half - plane motion again as in Type 1 lattice grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $ (i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.
By the following two cases we obtain that $ $ w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $ \nu_j - j \ge 0 $, then $ $ \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j } = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j } (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k } \alpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j - \ |
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);
(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) uo (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);
at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; av (4.3,-3.5) [$\alphz + \beta$]{}; xt (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};
Note that uwing eeterminantal formulas,, the formlla is eqyivaownt to the determikcntal normune by applying tme Cauchy-Bitet formula ingebeb by partitions.
We will perform one mjre tramsvormation of tre lsetics grid (now with some negative weiggts) whove nonintersevting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\ju}(\alpha, \betq)$.
Confuder the new [*Type 3*]{} latuiee grid as jn Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentiauly tke same as jkw Tjke 2 grid, but diagjnal steps ik its 1sd quadrsnt have negatlve wxighrs $-\alpha$ and all righv steps in 4th quadragt have waiyht $\alpha + \beta$. Pointw $Q_i$ haee tve sxne zooddmnafes, buh tie points $B_j$ on the ritht half-plane move sgwpm as in Type 1 lattycq grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $(i - \tu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.
By the followibg two cases we obtaij that $$w(A_y \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, than $$\wivegilbc{n}^{(i)}_{\mu_k - l,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\ajlhs + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k - \nu_k + j}.$$ Yf $ j - \ | (-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1); (2,-4+2); to (2+1,-4+2) (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to [$\alpha \beta$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) + \beta$]{}; at [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{}; Note that determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent to the determinantal formula by applying the formula indexed by partitions. We will perform one more transformation of the lattice (now some weights) nonintersecting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$. Consider the new [*Type 3*]{} lattice grid in Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentially the same the Type 2 grid, diagonal steps in its 1st have weights $-\alpha$ all steps 4th quadrant have $\alpha + \beta$. Points $A_i$ have the same coordinates, but the points $B_i$ on the right half-plane again as 1 lattice i.e. have coordinates $(i - - \nu_i - 1)$. By the we obtain that $$w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i i,\nu_j - If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k + j}.$$ If $ - \ |
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);
(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);
at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beTa$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha + \bEta$]{}; at (-4.5,2.5) [$\AlpHa$]{}; aT (2.0,2.5) [$-\aLpha$]{};
note That using deterMInanTal formulas,, the formula iS equiVaLEnt tO ThE deteRminantAL fORMulA bY aPplYiNG tHe CauChy-binet foRmula indexEd bY pArtitions.
We wILl Perform one MorE transformatIon Of the lAtTicE Grid (nOw wIth soMe negaTIve weiGhts) whose NoNIntersECting paTH SyStemS compute the same fuNCtIOn $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beTa)$.
ConsIdER tHE New [*typE 3*]{} lattice grId As in FIGure \[fig333\]. wHiCH IS esSEntially the saMe as the Type 2 GRid, But diaGoNal STeps in Its 1st QuADraNt have negatIve wEights $-\alpHa$ and aLL right sTEps in 4th QuadraNt hAve WeigHT $\aLpHa + \bEtA$. poiNTs $a_i$ hAVe tHe same coOrDiNates, But tHE POInts $b_i$ oN the Right Half-plane move AgaIn as IN TyPe 1 latTice gRid, i.E. tHey haVe the cOordiNaTes $(i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.
By thE folLowing two CasEs We oBtAin thAT $$w(A_i \to b_j) = \wIdeTilde{f}^{(i)}_{\Mu_i - i,\nu_j - J}.$$ if $\nU_j - J \GE 0$, ThEn $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nU_j - J} = \SUm_K \binom{\mu_I - k - 1}{i-1}\binOM{k}{K - \nU_J + j} (\alpha + \bEtA)^{\mu_I - i - k} \aLPHa^{k - \nu_J + j}.$$ If $ J - \ |
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to ( -1+1,-2+1) to ( -1+ 1,- 2+ 1+1) ;
( 2,-4) to (2,-4 + 2);(2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to ( 2+ 1 ,-4+ 2 +1 ); (2 +1,-4+2 + 1) t o ( 2+ 1, -4+ 2+ 1 +3 ) to(2+ 1+1,-4+ 2+1+3+1);
at ( -3.5,-3.5) [ $ \a lpha + \be ta$ ]{}; at (4.3 ,-3 .5) [$ \a lph a + \b eta $]{}; at (- 4 .5,2.5 ) [$\alph a$ ] {}; at (2.0,2. 5 ) [ $-\a lpha$]{};
Note t h at using determin antalfo r mu l a s,, th e formulais equi v alent t o t h e det e rminantal for mula by app l yin g theCa uch y -Binet form ul a in dexed by pa rtit ions.
We willp erformo ne more trans for mat iono fth e l at t ice gr id( now with so me n egati ve w e i g h ts)who se n onint ersecting pat h s yste m s c omput e the sam efunct ion $f _{\mu /\ nu}(\alpha, \be ta)$ .
Consid erth e n ew [*Ty p e 3*]{ } l att ice gri d as in Fig ur e \ [f ig333\]. Which ises s e nt ially th e same as t h e Type 2 g rid , bu t diago nals te ps in it s 1stq ua dr ant hav enegati ve we igh ts $- \ alph a$ and all rig ht st e ps in 4th quad r ant have weig h t$ \ al p ha + \b eta$. Point s $A _ i$ h avet he sa m e coo rdina te s ,b ut the points $B_i$ o n theright half-plane m ove againa s in Type1 la t ti c e grid, i.e. t hey h ave the co o rdinates $(i- \nu_i, i - \nu_ i - 1)$.
Bythe fo llo w i ng two cases we o btai nthat $$ w(A _i \toB_j ) = \w ide ti lde{f}^{( i)}_{\mu _i - i ,\ nu_ j - j } .$$ If $ \n u_j - j\ge 0 $ , then $$\w idet il de { f}^ {(i)}_{ \ mu _ i - i ,\ nu _j - j} = \sum _k \ b ino m{\mu_i - k - 1} {i- 1 }\bi no m{ k}{k -\nu_j + j} (\ al pha + \bet a) ^{\ mu_i - i - k} \a lpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j- \ |
(-1,-2) to_(-1,-2+1) to_(-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);
(2,-4) to_(2,-4+2); (2,-4+2)_to_(2+1,-4+2) to_(2+1,-4+2+1);_(2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3)_to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);
at (-3.5,-3.5)_[$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at_(4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha +_\beta$]{};_at (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};
Note that using determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent_to_the determinantal_formula_by_applying the Cauchy-Binet formula indexed_by partitions.
We will perform one_more transformation_of the lattice grid (now with some negative_weights)_whose nonintersecting path_systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$.
Consider the new_[*Type 3*]{} lattice grid as in_Figure \[fig333\]. Which_is_essentially_the same as the_Type 2 grid, but diagonal steps_in its 1st quadrant have negative_weights $-\alpha$ and all right steps in_4th quadrant have weight $\alpha +_\beta$. Points $A_i$ have the_same coordinates,_but the points $B_i$ on_the right half-plane_move again_as in Type_1 lattice grid, i.e. they have_the coordinates $(i_- \nu_i, i - \nu_i -_1)$.
By_the following two_cases_we_obtain that_$$w(A_i \to B_j)_=_\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i -_i,\nu_j_- j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j_\ge_0$, then $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}_= \sum_k \binom{\mu_i -_k_- 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j_+ j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i_- i - k} \alpha^{k -_\nu_j +_j}.$$ If_$ j - \ |
, D., Svensson, R., and Poutanen, J., 2001, 563, 80 Tavani, M., Barbiellini, G., Argan, A., et al., 2009, 502, 995 Takahashi, T., Abe, K., Endo, M., et al., 2007, 59, S35 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., & Griffee, 1996, in 3rd Huntsville Symposium, AIP Conf. Proc. 384 (AIP: New York), Eds. C. Kouveliotou, M. Briggs, and G. Fishman, 545 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., & Griffee, J., 1998, in Gamma-Ray Bursts, 4th Huntsville Symposium, Eds. C. Meegan, R. Preece, and T. Koshut, AIP Conf. Proc. 428, AIP Press (New York), p. 54 Terrell, J., & Klebesadel, R., 2004, in Gamma-Ray Bursts: 30 Years of Discovery, Eds. E. Fenimore and M. Galassi, AIP Conf. Proc. 727 (AIP: New York), p. 541 Trombka, J. I., Boynton, W. V., Brückner, J., et al., 1999, Nucl. Inst. And Methods in Physics Research A 422, 572 Yamaoka, K., Endo, A., Enoto, T., et al., 2009, 61, S35 Woods, P. M., Kouveliotou, C., van Paradijs, J., et al., 1999,, 527, L47 Zhang, B., Zhang, B.-B., Virgili, F., et al., 2009, 703, 1696 Zhang, X.-L., Rau, A., & von Kienlin, A. 2010, in proceeding of the 8th INTEGRAL Workshop The Restless Gamma-ray Universe, 2010 September 27–30, Dublin, Ireland, PoS (INTEGRAL 2010)161
[ccccrcccc]{} GRB19950210\_T08424 & 1995 Feb 10 & 02:20:24.148 & I & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) & Uly(T),GRO(\ | , D., Svensson, R., and Poutanen, J., 2001, 563, 80 Tavani, M., Barbiellini, G., Argan, A., et al. , 2009, 502, 995 Takahashi, T., Abe, K., Endo, M., et al. , 2007, 59, S35 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., & Griffee, 1996, in 3rd Huntsville Symposium, AIP Conf. Proc. 384 (AIP: New York), Eds. C. Kouveliotou, M. Briggs, and G. Fishman, 545 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., & Griffee, J., 1998, in Gamma - Ray Bursts, 4th Huntsville Symposium, Eds. C. Meegan, R. Preece, and T. Koshut, AIP Conf. Proc. 428, AIP Press (New York), p. 54 Terrell, J., & Klebesadel, R., 2004, in Gamma - Ray Bursts: 30 Years of Discovery, Eds. E. Fenimore and M. Galassi, AIP Conf. Proc. 727 (AIP: New York), p. 541 Trombka, J. I., Boynton, W. V., Brückner, J., et al. , 1999, Nucl. Inst. And Methods in Physics Research A 422, 572 Yamaoka, K., Endo, A., Enoto, T., et al. , 2009, 61, S35 Woods, P. M., Kouveliotou, C., van Paradijs, J., et al. , 1999, , 527, L47 Zhang, B., Zhang, B.-B., Virgili, F., et al. , 2009, 703, 1696 Zhang, X.-L., Rau, A., & von Kienlin, A. 2010, in proceeding of the 8th INTEGRAL Workshop The Restless Gamma - ray Universe, 2010 September 27–30, Dublin, Ireland, PoS (INTEGRAL 2010)161
[ ccccrcccc ] { } GRB19950210\_T08424 & 1995 Feb 10 & 02:20:24.148 & I & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) & Uly(T),GRO(\ | , D., Dvensson, R., and Poutanen, M., 2001, 563, 80 Tavani, M., Batbuellinm, G., Argzn, A., et xl., 2009, 502, 995 Takahashi, T., Abe, K., Endo, M., et ao., 2007, 59, S35 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Ylebesadep, R., & Gridfee, 1996, in 3rd Hunvaville Symposjmm, AI' Ronf. Proc. 384 (AIP: Kew York), Edv. C. Kouveliotog, O. Yriggs, and G. Fishman, 545 Terrell, J., Lee, [., Klebexafel, R., & Griffee, J., 1998, pn Gamja-Ray Bursts, 4th Huntsville Symposihm, Eds. B. Meegan, R. Preece, and T. Koshut, AIP Conf. Prof. 428, ALP Press (New York), o. 54 Terrell, H., & Kjwbesadel, R., 2004, kn Gamma-Raj Bursts: 30 Ygars of Discovery, Eds. E. Fenimore and K. Galassi, QIP Cltf. Proc. 727 (AI': New Jork), p. 541 Trombka, J. I., Bmynton, E. V., Brückner, J., ct al., 1999, Nycl. Inst. And Methods mn Physics Research W 422, 572 Yamaona, K., Endo, A., Enoto, T., er al., 2009, 61, S35 Foodr, P. O., Kkuteljotou, F., ven Paradijs, J., et al., 1999,, 527, O47 Zhang, B., Zhang, B.-B., Fiwtili, F., et al., 2009, 703, 1696 Zhagg, X.-L., Rau, A., & von Kienlin, A. 2010, in proceeding of the 8th INTEGRAL Workship The Restless Gamma-tay Univerfe, 2010 September 27–30, Dublin, Ireland, PoS (INTEGRAL 2010)161
[ccccrcwcc]{} GCB19950210\_G08424 & 1995 Fcb 10 & 02:20:24.148 & L & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) & Uly(T),GRO(\ | , D., Svensson, R., and Poutanen, J., 80 M., Barbiellini, Argan, A., et T., K., Endo, M., al., 2007, 59, Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., Griffee, 1996, in 3rd Huntsville Symposium, AIP Conf. Proc. 384 (AIP: New York), C. Kouveliotou, M. Briggs, and G. Fishman, 545 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, & J., in Bursts, 4th Huntsville Symposium, Eds. C. Meegan, R. Preece, and T. Koshut, AIP Conf. Proc. 428, Press (New York), p. 54 Terrell, J., & R., 2004, in Gamma-Ray 30 Years of Discovery, Eds. Fenimore M. Galassi, Conf. 727 New York), p. Trombka, J. I., Boynton, W. V., Brückner, J., et al., 1999, Nucl. Inst. And Methods in Physics A 422, K., Endo, Enoto, et 2009, 61, S35 M., Kouveliotou, C., van Paradijs, J., 527, L47 Zhang, B., Zhang, B.-B., Virgili, F., al., 2009, 1696 Zhang, X.-L., Rau, A., & Kienlin, A. 2010, in proceeding of the 8th Workshop The Restless Gamma-ray Universe, 2010 September 27–30, Dublin, Ireland, PoS (INTEGRAL 2010)161 [ccccrcccc]{} GRB19950210\_T08424 Feb 10 & 02:20:24.148 I & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) Uly(T),GRO(\ | , D., Svensson, R., and Poutanen, J., 2001, 563, 80 TavAni, M., BarbieLlini, g., ArGan, a., eT al., 2009, 502, 995 TAkahAshi, T., Abe, K., Endo, M., ET al., 2007, 59, S35 terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, r., & GrifFeE, 1996, In 3rd hUnTsvilLe SympoSIuM, aiP COnF. PRoc. 384 (aIp: neW York), eds. c. KouvelIotou, M. BrigGs, aNd g. Fishman, 545 TerrELl, j., Lee, P., KlebeSadEl, R., & Griffee, J., 1998, iN GaMma-Ray buRstS, 4Th HunTsvIlle SYmposiUM, Eds. C. MEegan, R. PreEcE, And T. KoSHut, AIP CONF. PRoc. 428, AiP Press (New York), p. 54 TeRReLL, J., & Klebesadel, R., 2004, iN Gamma-raY buRSTs: 30 YEarS of DiscoveRy, eds. E. FENimore aND M. gALAssI, aIP Conf. Proc. 727 (AIp: New York), p. 541 TrOMbkA, J. I., BoyNtOn, W. v., brücknEr, J., et Al., 1999, nUcl. inst. And MethOds iN Physics REsearcH a 422, 572 YamaokA, k., Endo, A., ENoto, T., eT al., 2009, 61, s35 WoOds, P. m., koUvEliOtOU, C., vAN PAraDIjs, j., et al., 1999,, 527, L47 ZhAnG, B., zhang, b.-B., ViRGILI, F., et Al., 2009, 703, 1696 ZHang, x.-L., Rau, a., & von Kienlin, A. 2010, iN prOceeDIng Of the 8Th INTeGRAl WOrkshOp The REstleSs gamma-ray UniversE, 2010 SepTember 27–30, DubLin, irElaNd, poS (INteGRAL 2010)161
[cCccRccCc]{} GRB19950210\_T08424 & 1995 FEb 10 & 02:20:24.148 & I & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) & Uly(T),grO(\ | , D., Svensson, R., and Po utanen, J. , 200 1,563 ,80 T avan i, M., Barbiel l ini, G., Argan, A., et al. , 200 9, 502, 99 5 Tak ahashi, T. , Abe ,K. , E nd o ,M., e t a l., 200 7, 59, S35 Te rr ell, J., Lee , P ., Klebesa del , R., & Grif fee , 1996 ,in3 rd Hu nts ville Sympo s ium, A IP Conf.Pr o c. 384 (AIP: N e w Y ork) , Eds. C. Kouveli o to u , M. Briggs, a nd G.Fi s hm a n , 5 45Terrell, J ., Lee, P., Kle b es a d e l,R ., & Griffee, J., 1998,i n G amma-R ay Bu r sts, 4 th Hu nt s vil le Symposiu m, E ds. C. Me egan,R . Preec e , and T . Kosh ut, AI P Co n f. P roc .4 28, AI P P r ess (New Yo rk ), p. 5 4 Te r r e l l, J .,& Kl ebesa del, R., 2004 , i n Ga m ma- Ray B ursts : 30 Y earsof Dis cover y, Eds. E. Fenimo re a nd M. Gal ass i, AI PConf. Proc.727 (A IP: New York), p.54 1 T ro mbka, J. I., Boynt on , W. V., Brü ckner, J. ,e t al., 1 99 9,Nucl . Inst. And Me thods in Physi c sRe searchA422, 5 72 Ya mao ka, K . , En do, A. , Enoto, T.,e t al., 2009, 6 1 , S35 Woods,P .M . ,K ouve lio tou, C., va n Pa r adij s, J . ,eta l., 1 999,, 5 2 7, L47 Zhang, B., Zhan g, B.-B. , Vir gili, F., etal., 2009, 7 0 3, 1696Zhan g ,X .-L., Rau, A., & vo n Kienlin, A. 2010, in p roceedin g of the8 t h INTEGR ALWor ksh opT h eRestless Gamm a - rayUn iverse, 20 10 Sept emb er27– 30, D ublin, Ir eland, P oS ( IN TE GRA L 201 0 )161
[c cc crc cc c]{ } GRB 1 995021 0\_T0 8424 & 1 9 95Feb 10& 0 2 : 20:2 4. 14 8 &I & - 2.602 (-0. 0 09, +0.007) & Uly(T) ,GR O (\ | , D.,_Svensson, R.,_and Poutanen, J., 2001,_563, 80_Tavani,_M., Barbiellini,_G.,_Argan, A., et_al., 2009, 502,_995 Takahashi, T., Abe,_K., Endo, M.,_et_al., 2007, 59, S35 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R., & Griffee, 1996, in_3rd_Huntsville Symposium,_AIP_Conf._Proc. 384 (AIP: New York),_Eds. C. Kouveliotou, M. Briggs,_and G._Fishman, 545 Terrell, J., Lee, P., Klebesadel, R.,_&_Griffee, J., 1998,_in Gamma-Ray Bursts, 4th Huntsville Symposium, Eds. C. Meegan,_R. Preece, and T. Koshut, AIP_Conf. Proc. 428,_AIP_Press_(New York), p. 54_Terrell, J., & Klebesadel, R., 2004,_in Gamma-Ray Bursts: 30 Years of_Discovery, Eds. E. Fenimore and M. Galassi,_AIP Conf. Proc. 727 (AIP: New_York), p. 541 Trombka, J._I., Boynton,_W. V., Brückner, J., et_al., 1999, Nucl._Inst. And_Methods in Physics_Research A 422, 572 Yamaoka, K.,_Endo, A., Enoto,_T., et al., 2009, 61, S35_Woods,_P. M., Kouveliotou,_C.,_van_Paradijs, J.,_et al., 1999,,_527,_L47 Zhang,_B.,_Zhang, B.-B., Virgili, F., et al.,_2009,_703, 1696 Zhang, X.-L., Rau, A., &_von Kienlin, A. 2010,_in_proceeding of the 8th_INTEGRAL Workshop The Restless Gamma-ray_Universe, 2010 September 27–30, Dublin, Ireland,_PoS (INTEGRAL_2010)161
[ccccrcccc]{} GRB19950210\_T08424_& 1995 Feb 10 & 02:20:24.148 & I & -2.602(-0.009,+0.007) &_Uly(T),GRO(\ |
to} \approx 0.1 r_o/(10^{-2} U_0) \approx 10 Ro^{-1} \Omega^{-1} \approx 10^{3}\Omega^{-1}$: the turnover time of the particle is much longer than the timescale of the wave. Consequently the particle oscillates rapidly as the wave propagates and is slowly advected by the zonal flow. In practice the radial displacement $l$ is typically smaller than $\delta$ and so the turnover time is slightly overestimated here.
#### Supercritical regime
When the Rossby number is increased in the supercritical regime, other prograde jets will eventually become unstable. A second Rossby wave appears in the weakly supercritical regime, at $Ro=1.06 Ro_c$ for $E=5\times 10^{-6}$, with a maximum velocity located in the retrograde zonal jet at larger radius than the first wave maxima ([*i.e.*]{} the wave appearing for $Ro=Ro_c$) (figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R3600\]). To fill the larger circumference at larger radius the instability has a slightly larger wave number, $m=22$ instead of $21$, while the radial width of the jet is comparable. The second wave propagates faster, in agreement with the Rossby wave dispersion relation (\[eq:w\_RW\]). Barotropic instabilities tend to broaden and weaken narrow jets by redistributing potential vorticity [see for instance @Ped87]. The smoothing of the jets saturates the amplitude of the Rossby waves. For this slightly supercritical regime the zonal flow profile is only weakly modified. Upon further increasing the forcing ($Ro=2.94 Ro_c$), several Rossby waves of different wavenumbers superpose and interact (figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R10000\]). The structure of the waves and the jets is still mainly bidimensional except in the viscous boundary layers. The typical cylindrical radial velocity is $V_s \approx 0.1 U_0$ and the Rossby number is $0.05$ so the turnover time is about $20\Omega^{-1}$ assuming that the radial displacement $l=\delta$, about the same order of magnitude as the timescale of the zonal jets.
In figure \[fig:U\_s\_satur\] the time-averaged zonal flow in the equatorial plane is plotted for different $Ro$ up to $ | to } \approx 0.1 r_o/(10^{-2 } U_0) \approx 10 Ro^{-1 } \Omega^{-1 } \approx 10^{3}\Omega^{-1}$: the turnover time of the particle is much long than the timescale of the wave. Consequently the atom oscillates rapidly as the wave propagates and is slowly advect by the zonal flow. In exercise the radial displacement $ l$ is typically smaller than $ \delta$ and indeed the dollar volume time is slightly overestimated here.
# # # # Supercritical regime
When the Rossby issue is increased in the supercritical regime, early prograde jets will eventually become unstable. A second Rossby wave appears in the weakly supercritical regime, at $ Ro=1.06 Ro_c$ for $ E=5\times 10^{-6}$, with a maximum speed located in the retrograde zonal jet at larger spoke than the first wave maxima ([ * i.e. * ] { } the wave appearing for $ Ro = Ro_c$) (figure \[fig: U\_E5e6R3600\ ]). To fill the larger circumference at bigger radius the instability has a slightly larger wave numeral, $ m=22 $ instead of $ 21 $, while the radial width of the jet is comparable. The second wave propagates faster, in agreement with the Rossby wave dispersion relation (\[eq: w\_RW\ ]). Barotropic instabilities tend to broaden and weaken narrow jets by redistributing potential vorticity [ see for instance @Ped87 ]. The smoothing of the jets saturates the amplitude of the Rossby wave. For this slightly supercritical regime the zonal menstruation profile is only weakly modified. Upon further increase the forcing ($ Ro=2.94 Ro_c$), several Rossby waves of different wavenumbers superpose and interact (design \[fig: U\_E5e6R10000\ ]). The structure of the waves and the jets is still mainly bidimensional except in the gluey boundary layers. The typical cylindrical radial velocity is $ V_s \approx 0.1 U_0 $ and the Rossby number is $ 0.05 $ so the upset time is about $ 20\Omega^{-1}$ assume that the radial translation $ l=\delta$, about the same order of magnitude as the timescale of the zonal k.
In figure \[fig: U\_s\_satur\ ] the time - averaged zonal flow in the equatorial plane is plotted for different $ Ro$ up to $ | to} \wpprox 0.1 r_o/(10^{-2} U_0) \approx 10 Ro^{-1} \Umega^{-1} \approx 10^{3}\Omggq^{-1}$: the vurnoved time ow the particle is much longec thqn tht timescale of the dave. Consvquently rhe karticle oscillatxa rapidly as fme ware propagates anc is slowlf advected by dhd vonal flow. In practice the radial difplacemrnh $l$ is typicaljy skwlled than $\delta$ and so the turnover tjme is vlightly overrstimated here.
#### Supercriticwl rfgime
When the Rosshy number iw inseeased in thd supercriuieal regime, kther prograde jets will eventuxlly yecome unstqboe. W second Roswby wwve appears lm the feakly xupercritical vegimx, at $Ro=1.06 Ro_c$ for $E=5\times 10^{-6}$, wmth a maximum velocijy located iu the retrograde zonao het aj larcer fqdijs uhai tge firdt xave maxima ([*i.e.*]{} the wave appearing for $Ro=Ro_v$) (spbure \[fig:U\_E5e6R3600\]). Fo filj ehe larger circumference at larger radils tge instability has a slughtly larger wave nulber, $m=22$ inftead of $21$, while the radial width of the jet is cokparauld. Tkc rwclnd wave propagates faster, in agreement with ege Rpssby wave disiersion relation (\[eq:e\_RA\]). Nwrotropic insjabilitnss tend to broaden ajd weakgn nareow jets fy rrdistributing potential vorricity [see fje instance @Ped87]. The smoothing uf tne jeys saturates the amplitbde of the Rossby waves. Fod this slightly sjpegcridical regime the zonal flor profile is pnly wexkly modifyed. Upon fkrthev increasing the fogcing ($Rm=2.94 Ro_c$), sevegal Rossby waves of different wetenumbers supgrpmse and intzract (nigure \[fig:U\_E5e6R10000\]). Tre structure oy the wares ana the jets is stinl mainly bydimensional adcept in the viscous boubdart layerr. The typical culindrical radial vwlocity is $V_s \apprpx 0.1 H_0$ and the Rossbv bumber is $0.05$ so tne gurgoner tyke is about $20\Mmegx^{-1}$ arxumine that uke vadkal cisplacement $l=\delta$, dbouf the same order og iagnitudg as the eimescale of yhe zonal jets.
In flgure \[hig:U\_s\_setur\] tne jime-averaged zonal flow in the squatoriap pjane is ploteed nor qifferent $Xo$ up to $ | to} \approx 0.1 r_o/(10^{-2} U_0) \approx 10 \approx the turnover of the particle timescale the wave. Consequently particle oscillates rapidly the wave propagates and is slowly by the zonal flow. In practice the radial displacement $l$ is typically smaller $\delta$ and so the turnover time is slightly overestimated here. #### Supercritical regime the number increased the supercritical regime, other prograde jets will eventually become unstable. A second Rossby wave appears in weakly supercritical regime, at $Ro=1.06 Ro_c$ for $E=5\times with a maximum velocity in the retrograde zonal jet larger than the wave ([*i.e.*]{} wave appearing for (figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R3600\]). To fill the larger circumference at larger radius the instability has a slightly larger wave $m=22$ instead while the width the is comparable. The propagates faster, in agreement with the relation (\[eq:w\_RW\]). Barotropic instabilities tend to broaden and narrow jets redistributing potential vorticity [see for instance The smoothing of the jets saturates the amplitude the Rossby waves. For this slightly supercritical regime the zonal flow profile is only weakly further increasing the forcing Ro_c$), several Rossby of wavenumbers and (figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R10000\]). structure of the waves and the jets is still mainly bidimensional in the viscous boundary layers. The typical cylindrical radial velocity \approx U_0$ and the number is $0.05$ so turnover is about $20\Omega^{-1}$ assuming radial $l=\delta$, order magnitude the timescale of the jets. In figure \[fig:U\_s\_satur\] the zonal flow in the different $Ro$ up to $ | to} \approx 0.1 r_o/(10^{-2} U_0) \approx 10 Ro^{-1} \Omega^{-1} \aPprox 10^{3}\Omega^{-1}$: The tuRnoVer TiMe of The pArticle is much lONger Than the timescale of the wAve. CoNsEQuenTLy The paRticle oSCiLLAteS rApIdlY aS ThE wave ProPagates And is slowlY adVeCted by the zonAL fLow. In practIce The radial disPlaCement $L$ iS tyPIcallY smAller Than $\deLTa$ and sO the turnoVeR Time is SLightly OVErEstiMated here.
#### SupercriTIcAL regime
When the rossby NuMBeR IS inCreAsed in the sUpErcriTIcal regIMe, OTHEr pROgrade jets wilL eventually BEcoMe unstAbLe. A SEcond ROssby WaVE apPears in the wEaklY supercriTical rEGime, at $RO=1.06 ro_c$ for $E=5\Times 10^{-6}$, wIth A maXimuM VeLoCitY lOCatED iN thE RetRograde zOnAl Jet at LargER RADius ThaN the First Wave maxima ([*i.e.*]{} tHe wAve aPPeaRing fOr $Ro=RO_c$) (fiGuRe \[fig:u\_E5e6R3600\]). To Fill tHe Larger circumferEnce At larger rAdiUs The InStabiLIty has A slIghTly largEr wave nUMbeR, $m=22$ INSTeAd of $21$, while the radial WiDTH oF the jet iS compaRAbLe. tHe second WaVe pRopaGATes faSter, IN aGreement With thE roSsBy wave dIsPersioN rElaTioN (\[eq:w\_Rw\]). baroTropic InstabilIties TEnd to broaden anD Weaken narrow jETs BY ReDIstrIbuTing potentiAl voRTiciTy [seE FoR inSTance @ped87]. ThE sMOoTHing of the jets saturaTeS the amPlituDe of the Rossby Waves. For thIS SLightly sUperCRiTIcal regime the zOnal fLow profile IS only weaKly moDified. UpOn further INCreasing The ForCinG ($Ro=2.94 rO_C$), sEveral Rossby wAVEs of DiFferent WavEnumberS suPerPosE anD iNteract (fiGure \[fig:U\_e5e6r10000\]). THe StRucTure oF The waves AnD thE jEts Is stiLL mainlY bidiMensIoNaL ExcEpt in thE ViSCOus bOuNdAry lAyeRs. the tyPicaL CylIndricaL radial veLocITy is $v_s \ApProx 0.1 U_0$ anD the Rossby numBeR is $0.05$ so the tuRnOveR time iS ABout $20\OmegA^{-1}$ assuming that the radial dISplacemEnt $L=\deltA$, aboUt the same OrdEr of maGniTUde as tHe timeScale Of The ZONal jeTS.
in FigUrE \[fig:U\_s\_satuR\] THe tIme-avErAged Zonal flOw in the equatorial pLAne Is plotted for dIffErenT $rO$ uP to $ | to} \approx 0.1 r_o/(10^{- 2} U_0) \a pprox 10 Ro ^{ -1}\Ome ga^{-1} \appro x 10^ {3}\Omega^{-1}$: the t urnov er time of theparticl e i s muc hlo nge rt ha n the ti mescale of the wa ve. C onsequentlyt he particleosc illates rapi dly as th ewav e prop aga tes a nd iss lowlyadvectedby the zo n al flow . In pra ctice the radiald is p lacement $l$ i s typi ca l ly s mal ler than $\de lt a$ an d so the tu r n o ver time is sligh tly overest i mat ed her e.
# # ## Sup ercri ti c alregime
Whe n th e Rossbynumber is incr e ased in the s upe rcr itic a lre gim e, oth e rpro g rad e jets w il levent uall y b e come un stab le. A second Rossb y w avea ppe ars i n the wea kl y sup ercrit icalre gime, at $Ro=1. 06 R o_c$ for$E= 5\ tim es 10^{ - 6}$, w ith amaximum veloci t y l oc a t e din the retrogradezo n a ljet at l argerr ad iu s than th efir st w a v e max ima( [* i.e.*]{} the w a ve a ppearin gfor $R o= Ro_ c$) (fig u re \ [fig:U \_E5e6R3 600\] ) . To fill thel arger circumf e re n c ea t la rge r radius th e in s tabi lity ha s a sligh tly l ar g er wave number, $m=22$ i nstead of $ 21$, while th e radial w i d t h of the jet is comparable. Th e sec ond wave p r opagates fast er, in a greementw i th the R oss bywav e d i s pe rsion relatio n (\[e q: w\_RW\] ).Barotro pic in sta bil it ies tendto broad en a nd w eak en na r row jets b y r ed ist ribut i ng pot entia l vo rt ic i ty[see fo r i n s tanc e@P ed87 ].Th e smo othi n g o f the j ets satur ate s the a mp litudeof the Rossby w aves. Forth isslight l y supercr itical regime the zonal flow pr ofi le is onl y weaklymod ified. Up o n furt her in creas in g t h e forc i n g($R o= 2.94 Ro_c$ ) , se veral R ossb y waves of different wave n umb ers superpose an d in t e ra ct( fi g ure \ [ fig : U \_E5e6R10000\]) . The stru ct u re of the wa v esan d the j ets isstill mainlybidimensi onal exce pt int h e v iscous bou ndary la yers. The typic a lcylin dri cal ra di alveloc ity is $V_ s \ap prox 0 .1 U_0$and t he Rossbynumber is $0.05$ so the turno ver t ime is about $2 0 \Om ega^{-1}$ ass uming that th e r adial di s place ment $l =\d e lta$, abo u t the sam e o rde r of magnitudea s the time sca l e of t he z onal jets.
In fi g ure \[fig:U\_s \_sa t u r\] th e tim e- averaged zonal fl ow i n the eq ua torial plan e is plo tt e d for diffe rent $ Ro$ upt o $ | to} \approx_0.1 r_o/(10^{-2}_U_0) \approx 10 Ro^{-1}_\Omega^{-1} \approx_10^{3}\Omega^{-1}$:_the turnover_time_of the particle_is much longer_than the timescale of_the wave. Consequently_the_particle oscillates rapidly as the wave propagates and is slowly advected by the zonal_flow._In practice_the_radial_displacement $l$ is typically smaller_than $\delta$ and so the_turnover time_is slightly overestimated here.
#### Supercritical regime
When the Rossby_number_is increased in_the supercritical regime, other prograde jets will eventually become_unstable. A second Rossby wave appears_in the weakly_supercritical_regime,_at $Ro=1.06 Ro_c$ for_$E=5\times 10^{-6}$, with a maximum velocity_located in the retrograde zonal jet_at larger radius than the first wave_maxima ([*i.e.*]{} the wave appearing for $Ro=Ro_c$)_(figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R3600\]). To fill the larger_circumference at_larger radius the instability has_a slightly larger_wave number,_$m=22$ instead of_$21$, while the radial width of_the jet is_comparable. The second wave propagates faster,_in_agreement with the_Rossby_wave_dispersion relation (\[eq:w\_RW\])._Barotropic instabilities tend_to_broaden and_weaken_narrow jets by redistributing potential vorticity_[see_for instance @Ped87]. The smoothing of the_jets saturates the amplitude_of_the Rossby waves. For_this slightly supercritical regime the_zonal flow profile is only weakly_modified. Upon_further increasing_the forcing ($Ro=2.94 Ro_c$), several Rossby waves of different wavenumbers superpose_and interact (figure \[fig:U\_E5e6R10000\]). The structure of_the waves and the_jets is_still_mainly bidimensional except_in_the viscous_boundary layers. The typical cylindrical radial velocity_is $V_s_\approx 0.1 U_0$ and the Rossby_number is $0.05$ so_the_turnover time is about $20\Omega^{-1}$ assuming_that the radial displacement $l=\delta$, about_the same order of magnitude_as_the_timescale of the zonal jets.
In_figure \[fig:U\_s\_satur\] the time-averaged zonal flow in_the equatorial plane_is plotted for different $Ro$ up to_$ |
end{aligned}$$ To calculate $p_0$ and $\alpha_0$ we know that the real time an atom needs to leave a kink is $\tau_3$, and as there are two kinks at the ends of the facet, $\tau_3/2$ is, to a good approximation, the average time to leave state $0$. Thus that we find: $$\begin{aligned}
p_0 &=& 2\rho \\
\alpha_0 &=& 1 - 2\rho \end{aligned}$$ Calling $n_i$ the average time to go from state $i$ to the absorbent state $L/2$, we have the equations : $$\begin{aligned}
n_0 &=& 1 + \alpha_0 n_0 + p_0 n_1 \label{appen_eq0} \\
n_k &=& 1 + \frac{n_{k-1}}{2} + \frac{ n_{k+1}}{2} \label{appen_eqk} \\
with & & k \ge 1 \nonumber\\
n_{L/2}&=& 0 \label{appen_eqL}\end{aligned}$$ and $n_{L/2}=0$. Summing equations \[appen\_eqk\] from $k=1$ to $j$, and then from $j=1$ to $L/2-1$, and using Eq. \[appen\_eqL\], one finds : $$n_1 = \frac{L-2}{L} n_0 + \frac{L-2}{2}$$ And Eq. \[appen\_eq0\] permits to obtain $n_0$ : $$n_0 = \frac{L}{2p_0} + \frac{L(L-2)}{4}$$ Going back to real time, one finds the average time $\tau$ a particle needs to leave a kink and reach the center of the facet is: $$t_{p,q,\alpha} = \frac{L}{4}\tau_3 + \frac{L(L-2)}{4} \tau_2
\label{appen_2_final}$$
Calculation of $n_0$ {#appen_3}
====================
To carry out the calculation, we can first calculate the $n_k$ for $k
\ge 1 | end{aligned}$$ To calculate $ p_0 $ and $ \alpha_0 $ we know that the real time an atom need to bequeath a kink is $ \tau_3 $, and as there are two kinks at the end of the facet, $ \tau_3/2 $ is, to a good estimate, the average time to leave state of matter $ 0$. Thus that we find: $ $ \begin{aligned }
p_0 & = & 2\rho \\
\alpha_0 & = & 1 - 2\rho \end{aligned}$$ call $ n_i$ the average time to fail from state $ i$ to the absorbent state $ L/2 $, we have the equations: $ $ \begin{aligned }
n_0 & = & 1 + \alpha_0 n_0 + p_0 n_1 \label{appen_eq0 } \\
n_k & = & 1 + \frac{n_{k-1}}{2 } + \frac { n_{k+1}}{2 } \label{appen_eqk } \\
with & & k \ge 1 \nonumber\\
n_{L/2}&= & 0 \label{appen_eqL}\end{aligned}$$ and $ n_{L/2}=0$. Summing equations \[appen\_eqk\ ] from $ k=1 $ to $ j$, and then from $ j=1 $ to $ L/2 - 1 $, and use Eq. \[appen\_eqL\ ], one finds: $ $ n_1 = \frac{L-2}{L } n_0 + \frac{L-2}{2}$$ And Eq. \[appen\_eq0\ ] permits to obtain $ n_0 $: $ $ n_0 = \frac{L}{2p_0 } + \frac{L(L-2)}{4}$$ start back to real time, one finds the average clock time $ \tau$ a particle needs to leave a kink and reach the plaza of the facet is: $ $ t_{p, q,\alpha } = \frac{L}{4}\tau_3 + \frac{L(L-2)}{4 } \tau_2
\label{appen_2_final}$$
Calculation of $ n_0 $ { # appen_3 }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
To carry out the calculation, we can first calculate the $ n_k$ for $ k
\ge 1 | end{wligned}$$ To calculate $p_0$ akd $\alpha_0$ we know that tie real time an atom needs to leave a kink ms $\tqu_3$, ane as there are two kinys at the ends of the dacet, $\tau_3/2$ ma, to a njod ziproxnmetion, the averane time to neave state $0$. Tvur chat we find: $$\begin{aligned}
p_0 &=& 2\rho \\
\alphw_0 &=& 1 - 2\rhp \fnd{aligned}$$ Caljing $g_i$ tgv cverage time to go from state $i$ to the absorbent stste $L/2$, we have the equationd : $$\bfgin{aligned}
n_0 &=& 1 + \aloha_0 n_0 + p_0 n_1 \oabej{qppen_eq0} \\
n_k &=& 1 + \frac{n_{k-1}}{2} + \frac{ n_{k+1}}{2} \labgl{appen_eqk} \\
with & & k \ge 1 \nonumbef\\
n_{L/2}&=& 0 \label{appeb_ewL}\ejg{aligned}$$ anv $n_{L/2}=0$. Slmming equations \[appen\_aqk\] frok $k=1$ to $j$, and tmen fcom $h=1$ to $L/2-1$, and using Eq. \[ap'en\_eqL\], one finds : $$n_1 = \frac{L-2}{L} n_0 + \yrac{L-2}{2}$$ And Eq. \[appen\_eq0\] pwrnits jo obdain $b_0$ : $$v_0 = \rrec{L}{2l_0} + \fraf{L(L-2)}{4}$$ Going baci to real tume, one finds the afewqge time $\tau$ z partycje needs to leave a kink and reach the bentsr of the facet is: $$t_{p,q,\aopha} = \frac{L}{4}\tau_3 + \frac{L(P-2)}{4} \tau_2
\labql{appen_2_final}$$
Calculation of $n_0$ {#appen_3}
====================
To carry out tha calruuatnin, we xaj first calculate the $n_k$ for $k
\ge 1 | end{aligned}$$ To calculate $p_0$ and $\alpha_0$ we the time an needs to leave as are two kinks the ends of facet, $\tau_3/2$ is, to a good the average time to leave state $0$. Thus that we find: $$\begin{aligned} p_0 2\rho \\ \alpha_0 &=& 1 - 2\rho \end{aligned}$$ Calling $n_i$ the average time go state to absorbent state $L/2$, we have the equations : $$\begin{aligned} n_0 &=& 1 + \alpha_0 n_0 + n_1 \label{appen_eq0} \\ n_k &=& 1 + \frac{n_{k-1}}{2} \frac{ n_{k+1}}{2} \label{appen_eqk} \\ & & k \ge 1 n_{L/2}&=& \label{appen_eqL}\end{aligned}$$ and Summing \[appen\_eqk\] $k=1$ to $j$, then from $j=1$ to $L/2-1$, and using Eq. \[appen\_eqL\], one finds : $$n_1 = \frac{L-2}{L} n_0 + And Eq. to obtain : = + \frac{L(L-2)}{4}$$ Going real time, one finds the average particle needs to leave a kink and reach center of facet is: $$t_{p,q,\alpha} = \frac{L}{4}\tau_3 + \tau_2 \label{appen_2_final}$$ Calculation of $n_0$ {#appen_3} ==================== To out the calculation, we can first calculate the $n_k$ for $k \ge 1 | end{aligned}$$ To calculate $p_0$ and $\Alpha_0$ we knoW that The ReaL tIme aN atoM needs to leave a KInk iS $\tau_3$, and as there are two kiNks at ThE Ends OF tHe facEt, $\tau_3/2$ is, TO a GOOd aPpRoXimAtIOn, The avEraGe time tO leave statE $0$. ThUs That we find: $$\beGIn{Aligned}
p_0 &=& 2\rhO \\
\alPha_0 &=& 1 - 2\rho \end{aliGneD}$$ CalliNg $N_i$ tHE averAge Time tO go froM State $i$ To the absoRbENt statE $l/2$, we have THE eQuatIons : $$\begin{aligned}
n_0 &=& 1 + \ALpHA_0 n_0 + p_0 n_1 \label{appen_Eq0} \\
n_k &=& 1 + \frAc{N_{K-1}}{2} + \fRAC{ n_{k+1}}{2} \LabEl{appen_eqk} \\
WiTh & & k \ge 1 \NOnumber\\
N_{l/2}&=& 0 \lABEL{apPEn_eqL}\end{alignEd}$$ and $n_{L/2}=0$. SummINg eQuatioNs \[AppEN\_eqk\] frOm $k=1$ to $J$, aND thEn from $j=1$ to $L/2-1$, aNd usIng Eq. \[appeN\_eqL\], onE Finds : $$n_1 = \fRAc{L-2}{L} n_0 + \frAc{L-2}{2}$$ And eq. \[aPpeN\_eq0\] pERmItS to ObTAin $N_0$ : $$N_0 = \fRac{l}{2P_0} + \frAc{L(L-2)}{4}$$ GoinG bAcK to reAl tiME, ONE finDs tHe avErage Time $\tau$ a partiCle NeedS To lEave a Kink aNd reAcH the cEnter oF the fAcEt is: $$t_{p,q,\alpha} = \fraC{L}{4}\taU_3 + \frac{L(L-2)}{4} \taU_2
\laBeL{apPeN_2_finaL}$$
calculAtiOn oF $n_0$ {#appen_3}
====================
to carry OUt tHe CALCuLation, we can first caLcULAtE the $n_k$ foR $k
\ge 1 | end{aligned}$$ To calculat e $p_0$ an d $\a lph a_0 $we k nowthat the realt imean atom needs to leave a ki nk is $ \ ta u_3$, and as th e r e a re t woki n ks at t heends of the facet , $ \t au_3/2$ is,t oa good app rox imation, the av erageti met o lea vestate $0$.T hus th at we fin d: $$\beg i n{align e d }p_0&=& 2\rho \\
\alp h a_ 0 &=& 1 - 2\rho \end{ al i gn e d }$$ Ca lling $n_i $the a v erage t i me t o go from state $i $ to the ab s orb ent st at e $ L /2$, w e hav et heequations : $$\ begin{ali gned}n _0 &=&1 + \alp ha_0 n _0+ p _0 n _ 1\l abe l{ a ppe n _e q0} \\
n_k &=& 1 + \fra c{n_ { k - 1 }}{2 } + \fr ac{ n _{k+1}}{2} \l abe l{ap p en_ eqk}\\
w ith&& k \ ge 1 \ nonum be r\\
n_{L/2}&=& 0 \ label{app en_ eq L}\ en d{ali g ned}$$ an d $ n_{L/2} =0$. S u mmi ng e q ua tions \[appen\_eqk \] f ro m $k=1$to $j$ , a nd then fro m$j= 1$ t o $L/2- 1$,a nd using E q. \[a p pe n\ _eqL\], o ne fin ds :$$n _1 =\ frac {L-2}{ L} n_0 + \fra c {L-2}{2}$$ And Eq. \[appen\_ e q0 \ ] p e rmit s t o obtain $n _0$: $$n _0 = \f rac { L}{2p _0} + \ f ra c {L(L-2)}{4}$$ Going b ack to real time, one fi nds the av e r a ge time$\ta u $a particle need s toleave a ki n k and re ach t he cente r of thef a cet is:$$t _{p ,q, \al p h a} = \frac{L}{4 } \ tau_ 3+ \frac {L( L-2)}{4 } \ tau _2
\l ab el{appen_ 2_final} $$
Ca lc ula tiono f $n_0${# app en _3}
==== = ====== ===== ====
To car ry outt he c alcu la ti on,weca n fir st c a lcu late th e $n_k$ f or$ k
\g e1 | end{aligned}$$ To_calculate $p_0$_and $\alpha_0$ we know_that the_real_time an_atom_needs to leave_a kink is_$\tau_3$, and as there_are two kinks_at_the ends of the facet, $\tau_3/2$ is, to a good approximation, the average time_to_leave state_$0$._Thus_that we find: $$\begin{aligned}
p_0 &=&_2\rho \\
\alpha_0 &=& 1 -_2\rho \end{aligned}$$_Calling $n_i$ the average time to go from_state_$i$ to the_absorbent state $L/2$, we have the equations : $$\begin{aligned}
n_0_&=& 1 + \alpha_0 n_0 +_p_0 n_1 \label{appen_eq0}_\\_
n_k_&=& 1 + \frac{n_{k-1}}{2}_+ \frac{ n_{k+1}}{2} \label{appen_eqk} \\
with_& & k \ge 1 \nonumber\\_
n_{L/2}&=& 0 \label{appen_eqL}\end{aligned}$$ and $n_{L/2}=0$. Summing equations \[appen\_eqk\]_from $k=1$ to $j$, and then_from $j=1$ to $L/2-1$, and_using Eq. \[appen\_eqL\],_one finds : $$n_1 =_\frac{L-2}{L} n_0 +_\frac{L-2}{2}$$ And_Eq. \[appen\_eq0\] permits to_obtain $n_0$ : $$n_0 = \frac{L}{2p_0}_+ \frac{L(L-2)}{4}$$ Going_back to real time, one finds_the_average time $\tau$_a_particle_needs to_leave a kink_and_reach the_center_of the facet is: $$t_{p,q,\alpha} =_\frac{L}{4}\tau_3_+ \frac{L(L-2)}{4} \tau_2
\label{appen_2_final}$$
Calculation of $n_0$ {#appen_3}
====================
To_carry out the calculation,_we_can first calculate the_$n_k$ for $k
\ge 1 |
0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$
where $\epsilon << \nu$ and $\sigma^2$ is the variance of the Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $\xi(0) = \sigma^2$ and that this assumption of Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution of the density field. As the probability of finding a single peak within the sphere, $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is
$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r)
}\right] - 1$$
At large separation, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, then
$$\label{correlation}
\xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$
Thus, the proportionality between fluctuation amplitude and correlation strength is expected not only for the high amplitude peaks that form clusters (Kaiser 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\] and \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less correlated than HSBs, consistent with the Mo, McGaugh, & Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Further evidence of this reduced correlation may be manifested in weak correlation of faint galaxies (Koo & Szalay 1984, Stevenson et al. 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett & Infante 1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that the deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995).
The relationship between ${\bar\Sigma}$ and $\delta$ given in equation \[sigma\_delta\] also explains why differences in the correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s have only recently become apparent with the development of new samples of truly low- | 0)^2 - \xi(r)^2 } } \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$
where $ \epsilon < < \nu$ and $ \sigma^2 $ is the variance of the Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $ \xi(0) = \sigma^2 $ and that this assumption of Gaussian fluctuation ignore the non - linear evolution of the density discipline. As the probability of finding a single point within the celestial sphere, $ P_1 $ is $ (\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of extremum of amplitude $ \nu$ is
$ $ \xi_\nu(r) = { P_2 \over P_1 ^ 2 } -1 = { \xi(0)^2
\over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2 } } \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r)
} \right ] - 1$$
At large separation, where $ \xi(r) < < \xi(0)$, then
$ $ \label{correlation }
\xi_\nu(r) = { \nu^2 \over \sigma^2 } \xi(r)$$
therefore, the proportionality between fluctuation amplitude and correlation strength is expect not only for the eminent amplitude peaks that form bunch (Kaiser 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\ ] and \[sigma\_delta\ ] bode that LSBs are less correlated than HSBs, consistent with the Mo, McGaugh, & Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Further evidence of this boil down correlation may be manifested in weak correlation of faint galaxy (Koo & Szalay 1984, Stevenson et al. 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett & Infante 1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that the deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995).
The relationship between $ { \bar\Sigma}$ and $ \delta$ given in equation \[sigma\_delta\ ] also explains why differences in the correlation function of LSB ’s and HSB ’s have only recently become apparent with the development of new samples of rightfully low- | 0)^2 - \xl(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xl(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$
where $\gpwilon << \nu$ ans $\sigma^2$ ks the variance of the Gaussman dluctyations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $\xi(0) = \sigmw^2$ and thqt tiis assumption oh Gaussian fludbuatimis ignores the kon-linear eeolution of tha aeusity field. As the probability of figding a slngle peak witrin uhe sphsge, $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nh^2/2)$, the cmrrelation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is
$$\xl_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\oveg \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xu(r)^2}} \evp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \uver \xi(0) + \xp(x)
}\right] - 1$$
At marge separation, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, ghen
$$\lcbel{correlajnin}
\xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$
Thmx, the [roportoonality betwecn flnctuqtion amplitude and cmrrelation strengtr is expewtzd not only for the hugy ampnituge pdqks thzt fkrm clkstxrs (Kaiser 1984), but for alo collapsed objects. Ezlstions \[correlztion\] wnq \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less borrslated than HSBs, consisrent with the Mo, McGaogh, & Bothug (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Furthar evmddnct if thkw geduced correlation may be manifested in weak dotrvlation of faint nalaxies (Koo & Szalsy 1984, Xjevenson et al. 1985, Efstacgiku et al. 1991, Pritchett & Infanje 1992, Beenstein eu al. 1993), biven that the deep observarions are moge swnsitive to LSBs tkan local suxveys (Khillils, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGabgh 1994, Fsrguson & McHaugh 1995).
The felationship betdeek ${\bdr\Sigma}$ and $\delta$ given in equation \[wigmc\_delta\] auso gxplainf why difffrenccv in the correlatiln fuuctiot of LSB’s wnd HSB’s have only recently become apparent wotv tve develjpmenb of new samplef of truly low- | 0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over \xi(0)+ $\epsilon \nu$ and is the variance 1984). $\xi(0) = \sigma^2$ that this assumption Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution the density field. As the probability of finding a single peak within the $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is $$\xi_\nu(r) {P_2 P_1^2} = \over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r) }\right] - 1$$ At large separation, $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, then $$\label{correlation} \xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$ Thus, the between fluctuation amplitude and correlation is not only the amplitude that form clusters 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\] and \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less correlated than consistent with McGaugh, & (1994) of LSB and HSB evidence of this reduced correlation may weak correlation of faint galaxies (Koo & Szalay Stevenson et 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett Infante 1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995). relationship between ${\bar\Sigma}$ $\delta$ in \[sigma\_delta\] explains why in the correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s have only recently apparent with the development of new samples of truly low- | 0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(R)}\right],$$
wherE $\epsiLon << \Nu$ aNd $\SigmA^2$ is tHe variance of thE gausSian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). recalL $\xI(0) = \SigmA^2$ AnD that This assUMpTIOn oF GAuSsiAn FLuCtuatIonS ignoreS the non-linEar EvOlution of the DEnSity field. AS thE probability Of fInding A sIngLE peak WitHin thE spherE, $p_1$ is $(\epsIlon/\sqrt{2\pI}\sIGma) \exp(-\NU^2/2)$, the corRELaTion Of peaks of amplitudE $\Nu$ IS
$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\Over \sqRt{\XI(0)^2 - \xI(R)^2}} \Exp\LefT[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \Xi(0) + \Xi(r)
}\riGHt] - 1$$
At larGE sEPARatIOn, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, tHen
$$\label{corRElaTion}
\xi_\Nu(R) = {\nu^2 \OVer \sigMa^2} \xi(r)$$
thUS, thE proportionAlitY between fLuctuaTIon amplITude and CorrelAtiOn sTrenGTh Is ExpEcTEd nOT oNly FOr tHe high amPlItUde peAks tHAT FOrm cLusTers (kaiseR 1984), but for all colLapSed oBJecTs. EquAtionS \[corReLatioN\] and \[siGma\_deLtA\] predict that LSBS are Less correLatEd ThaN HsBs, coNSistenT wiTh tHe Mo, McGAugh, & BotHUn (1994) aNaLYSIs Of observed LSB and HSb sAMPlEs. FurtheR evideNCe Of THis reducEd CorRelaTIOn may Be maNIfEsted in wEak corRElAtIon of faInT galaxIeS (KoO & SzAlay 1984, STEvenSon et aL. 1985, EfstathIou et AL. 1991, Pritchett & InfaNTe 1992, Bernstein et AL. 1993), gIVEn THat tHe dEep observatIons ARe moRe seNSiTivE To LSBS than LoCAl SUrveys (Phillips, DavieS, & DIsney 1990, MCGaugH 1994, Ferguson & McGaUgh 1995).
The relaTIONship betWeen ${\BAr\sIgma}$ and $\delta$ giVen in Equation \[siGMa\_delta\] aLso exPlains whY differenCES in the coRreLatIon FunCTIoN of LSB’s and HSB’S HAve oNlY recentLy bEcome apParEnt WitH thE dEvelopmenT of new saMpLeS oF tRulY low- | 0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\lef t[-{\nu^2\sigm a^2 \o ve r
\x i(0) + \xi(r)}\righ t ],$$
where $\epsilon << \ nu$ a nd $\si g ma ^2$ i s the v a ri a n ceof t heGa u ss ian f luc tuation s (Kaiser198 4) . Recall $\x i (0 ) = \sigma ^2$ and that th isassump ti ono f Gau ssi an fl uctuat i ons ig nores the n o n-line a r evolu t i on ofthe density field . A s the probabili ty offi n di n g asin gle peak w it hin t h e spher e ,$ P _ 1$i s $(\epsilon/ \sqrt{2\pi} \ sig ma) \e xp (-\ n u^2/2) $, th ec orr elation ofpeak s of ampl itude$ \nu$ is
$$\xi_ \nu(r) ={P_ 2 \o v er P _1^ 2} -1= { \xi ( 0)^ 2
\over\s qr t{\xi (0)^ 2 - \xi( r)^ 2}}\exp\ left[{\nu^2 \ xi( r) \ o ver \xi( 0) +\xi( r)
}\ri ght] - 1$$
A t large separat ion, where $\ xi( r) << \ xi(0) $ , then
$ $\l abel{co rrelati o n} \ xi _\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \ ov e r \ sigma^2} \xi(r ) $$
T hus, the p rop orti o n ality bet w ee n fluctu ationa mp li tude an dcorrel at ion st rengt h isexpect ed not o nly f o r the high amp l itude peaks t h at f or m clu ste rs (Kaiser1984 ) , bu t fo r a llc ollap sed o bj e ct s . Equations \[corre la tion\] and\[sigma\_delt a\] predic t t hat LSBs are le s s correlated t han H SBs, consi s tent wit h the Mo, McG augh, & B o t hun (199 4)ana lys iso f o bserved LSB a n d HSB s amples. Fu rther e vid enc e o f t hi s reduced correla ti on m ay be mani f ested in w eak c orr elati o n of f aintgala xi es (Ko o & Sza l ay 1 984, S te vens onet al.1985 , Ef stathio u et al.199 1 , Pr it ch ett & I nfante 1992,Be rnstein et a l.1993), g iven tha t the deep observations are mor e s ensit iveto LSBs t han local su r veys ( Philli ps, D av ies , & Dis n e y199 0, McGaugh 1 9 9 4,Fergu so n &McGaugh 1995).
The relat i ons hip between $ {\b ar\S i g ma }$a nd $\d el t a$g i ven in equation \[sigma\_ de l ta \] also ex p lai ns why di fferenc es in the cor relationfunctionof LSB ’ s an d HSB’s ha ve onlyrecentlyb ecome ap paren t w ith th edev elopm ent of new samp les of t ruly l ow- | 0)^2 -_\xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2_\sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$
where $\epsilon_<< \nu$_and_$\sigma^2$ is_the_variance of the_Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser_1984). Recall $\xi(0) =_\sigma^2$ and that_this_assumption of Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution of the density field. As the_probability_of finding_a_single_peak within the sphere, $P_1$_is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation_of peaks_of amplitude $\nu$ is
$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2}_-1_= {\xi(0)^2
\over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2_- \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r)
}\right] -_1$$
At large separation, where $\xi(r) <<_\xi(0)$, then
$$\label{correlation}
___\xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over_\sigma^2} \xi(r)$$
Thus, the proportionality between fluctuation_amplitude and correlation strength is expected_not only for the high amplitude peaks_that form clusters (Kaiser 1984), but_for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\]_and \[sigma\_delta\] predict_that LSBs are less correlated_than HSBs, consistent_with the_Mo, McGaugh, &_Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB_and HSB samples._Further evidence of this reduced correlation_may_be manifested in_weak_correlation_of faint_galaxies (Koo &_Szalay_1984, Stevenson_et_al. 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett &_Infante_1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that the_deep observations are more_sensitive_to LSBs than local_surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney_1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh_1995).
The relationship_between ${\bar\Sigma}$_and $\delta$ given in equation \[sigma\_delta\] also explains why differences in the_correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s_have only recently become_apparent with_the_development of new_samples_of truly_low- |
{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ equal zero in (classical, *i.e.*, non-perverse) degrees $\ne r$, and $\mu_{\bf H}(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the Hodge theoretic setting) resp. $\mu_\ell(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the $\ell$-adic setting) in degree $r$.\
Denote by $j: M^K \into (M^K)^*$ the open immersion of $M^K$ into its Satake–(Baily–Borel) compactification, by $i: \partial (M^K)^* \into (M^K)^*$ its complement, and by $\Phi$ the natural stratification of $\partial (M^K)^*$ (the latter will be made explicit in the beginning of Section \[4\]). Here is our main result.
\[3Main\] (a) The motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}\in {\mathop{DM_{\text{{{\cyr B}}},c}}\nolimits}(\partial (M^K)^*)$ is a *$\Phi$-constructible motive of Abelian type over $\partial (M^K)^*$* (see Definition \[4a\]).\
(b) The motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ is without weights $$-k+1, -k+2, \ldots, k,$$ where $k := \min (k_1-k_2, k_2)$. Both weights $-k$ and $k+1$ *do* occur in $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$. In particular, ${}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ belongs to the sub-category ${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{{\mathbb{Q}}},\partial w \ne 0,1}$ of ${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}$ if and only if ${\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}$ is regular.
Theorem \[3Main\] should be compared to [@W7 Thm. 3.5], [@W8 Thm. 3.8], and [@C Thm. 3.6, Prop. 3.8, Prop | { \alpha}}\nolimits } } { { \cal V}}$ equal zero in (classical, * i.e. *, non - perverse) degrees $ \ne r$, and $ \mu_{\bf H}(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the Hodge theoretical place setting) resp. $ \mu_\ell(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the $ \ell$-adic setting) in degree $ r$.\
Denote by $ joule: M^K \into (M^K)^*$ the open submersion of $ M^K$ into its Satake–(Baily – Borel) compactification, by $ i: \partial (M^K)^ * \into (M^K)^*$ its complement, and by $ \Phi$ the natural stratification of $ \partial (M^K)^*$ (the latter will be made denotative in the beginning of department \[4\ ]). Here is our main result.
\[3Main\ ] (a) The motive $ i^*j _ * { } ^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits } } { { \cal V}}\in { \mathop{DM_{\text{{{\cyr B}}},c}}\nolimits}(\partial (M^K)^*)$ is a * $ \Phi$-constructible motive of Abelian character over $ \partial (M^K)^*$ * (see Definition \[4a\]).\
(b) The motive $ i^*j _ * { } ^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits } } { { \cal V}}$ is without weights $ $ -k+1, -k+2, \ldots, k,$$ where $ k: = \min (k_1 - k_2, k_2)$. Both burden $ -k$ and $ k+1 $ * do * occur in $ i^*j _ * { } ^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits } } { { \cal V}}$. In particular, $ { } ^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits } } { { \cal V}}$ belongs to the sub - category $ { \mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{{\mathbb{Q}}},\partial w \ne 0,1}$ of $ { \mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}$ if and merely if $ { \mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}$ is regular.
Theorem \[3Main\ ] should be compared to [ @W7 Thm. 3.5 ], [ @W8 Thm. 3.8 ], and [ @C Thm. 3.6, Prop. 3.8, Prop | {\alpja}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ equal ztro in (classical, *n.w.*, non-pxrverse) degrees $\ne r$, and $\mu_{\bf H}(V_{{\mathop{\underpibe{\alpya}}\nolimits}})$ (in the Hodgd theoretpc settint) rewp. $\mu_\ell(V_{{\matikp{\underline{\allma}}\nolnmmts}})$ (in the $\ell$-acic settinc) in degree $r$.\
Danutz by $j: M^K \into (M^K)^*$ the open immersion of $M^K$ onho its Satake–(Bwily–Njrel) bonpactification, by $i: \partial (M^I)^* \into (K^K)^*$ its complekent, and by $\Phi$ the naturap stgatification of $\pagtial (M^K)^*$ (thg laerer will be oade explibnt in the bgginning of Section \[4\]). Here is our oain xesult.
\[3Main\] (q) Tye lmtive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mavhop{\unqerline{\alpha}}\kplimitv}} {{\cal V}}\on {\mathop{DM_{\texb{{{\cyr U}}},c}}\nooimits}(\partial (M^K)^*)$ is a *$\Phi$-constructible iotive of Ayelian type over $\partuao (M^K)^*$* (vee Gefivutiun \[4a\]).\
(g) Tie jotive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\undsrline{\alpha}}\bolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ is wotriut weights $$-k+1, -k+2, \ldoes, k,$$ where $k := \min (k_1-k_2, k_2)$. Both weights $-k$ and $k+1$ *so* occur in $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\uneerline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\fal V}}$. In [articular, ${}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ belmngs vo tht wub-cagwglry ${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{{\mathbb{Q}}},\partial w \ne 0,1}$ os ${\mstmop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{\iathbb{Q}}}$ if snf pgly if ${\mathop{\onderlius{\ampha}}\nolimits}$ is rehular.
Thgorem \[3Mqin\] shoulq be compared to [@W7 Thm. 3.5], [@W8 Thm. 3.8], ane [@C Thm. 3.6, Prop. 3.8, Prop | {\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ equal zero in (classical, degrees r$, and H}(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the (in $\ell$-adic setting) in $r$.\ Denote by M^K \into (M^K)^*$ the open immersion $M^K$ into its Satake–(Baily–Borel) compactification, by $i: \partial (M^K)^* \into (M^K)^*$ its complement, by $\Phi$ the natural stratification of $\partial (M^K)^*$ (the latter will be made in beginning Section Here is our main result. \[3Main\] (a) The motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}\in {\mathop{DM_{\text{{{\cyr B}}},c}}\nolimits}(\partial (M^K)^*)$ a *$\Phi$-constructible motive of Abelian type over $\partial (see Definition \[4a\]).\ (b) motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ without $$-k+1, -k+2, k,$$ $k \min (k_1-k_2, k_2)$. weights $-k$ and $k+1$ *do* occur in $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$. In particular, ${}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ belongs the sub-category \ne 0,1}$ ${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}$ and if ${\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}$ is \[3Main\] should be compared to [@W7 Thm. 3.8], and [@C Thm. 3.6, Prop. 3.8, | {\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ equal zerO in (classicAl, *i.e.*, nOn-pErvErSe) deGreeS $\ne r$, and $\mu_{\bf H}(V_{{\mAThop{\Underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (In the hoDGe thEOrEtic sEtting) rESp. $\MU_\Ell(v_{{\mAtHop{\UnDErLine{\aLphA}}\nolimiTs}})$ (in the $\ell$-AdiC sEtting) in degrEE $r$.\
denote by $j: M^k \inTo (M^K)^*$ the open iMmeRsion oF $M^k$ inTO its SAtaKe–(BaiLy–BoreL) CompacTificatioN, bY $I: \partiAL (M^K)^* \into (m^k)^*$ ItS comPlement, and by $\Phi$ thE NaTUral stratificaTion of $\PaRTiAL (m^K)^*$ (tHe lAtter will bE mAde exPLicit in THe BEGInnINg of Section \[4\]). HeRe is our main REsuLt.
\[3Main\] (A) THe mOTive $i^*j_* {}^{{\MathoP{\uNDerLine{\alpha}}\noLimiTs}} {{\cal V}}\in {\mAthop{Dm_{\Text{{{\cyr b}}},C}}\nolimiTs}(\partIal (m^K)^*)$ iS a *$\PhI$-CoNsTruCtIBle MOtIve OF AbElian typE oVeR $\partIal (M^k)^*$* (SEE defiNitIon \[4a\]).\
(B) The mOtive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\UndErliNE{\alPha}}\noLimitS}} {{\cal v}}$ iS withOut weiGhts $$-k+1, -K+2, \lDots, k,$$ where $k := \min (k_1-K_2, k_2)$. BoTh weights $-K$ anD $k+1$ *Do* oCcUr in $i^*J_* {}^{{\Mathop{\UndErlIne{\alphA}}\nolimiTS}} {{\caL V}}$. iN PArTicular, ${}^{{\mathop{\underLiNE{\AlPha}}\nolimIts}} {{\cal v}}$ BeLoNGs to the sUb-CatEgorY ${\MAthop{cHM(M^k)}\NoLimits}_{{{\maThbb{Q}}},\pARtIaL w \ne 0,1}$ of ${\mAtHop{CHM(m^K)}\NolImiTs}_{{\matHBb{Q}}}$ iF and onLy if ${\mathOp{\undERline{\alpha}}\noliMIts}$ is regular.
THEoREM \[3MAIn\] shOulD be compared To [@W7 THM. 3.5], [@W8 ThM. 3.8], and [@c thM. 3.6, PrOP. 3.8, Prop | {\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\ca l V}}$ equ al ze roin(c lass ical , *i.e.*, non- p erve rse) degrees $\ne r$,and $ \m u _{\b f H }(V_{ {\matho p {\ u n der li ne {\a lp h a} }\nol imi ts}})$(in the Ho dge t heoretic set t in g) resp. $ \mu _\ell(V_{{\m ath op{\un de rli n e{\al pha }}\no limits } })$ (i n the $\e ll $ -adics etting) i ndegr ee $r$.\
Denote b y $ j : M^K \into (M ^K)^*$ t h eo p enimm ersion of$M ^K$ i n to itsS at a k e –(B a ily–Borel) co mpactificat i on, by $i :\pa r tial ( M^K)^ *\ int o (M^K)^*$itscomplemen t, and by $\Ph i $ the n atural st rat ific a ti on of $ \ par t ia l ( M ^K) ^*$ (the l at ter w illb e m adeexp lici t inthe beginning of Sec t ion \[4\ ]). H ereis ourmain r esult .
\[3Main\] (a)Themotive $i ^*j _* {} ^{ {\mat h op{\un der lin e{\alph a}}\nol i mit s} } { {\ cal V}}\in {\matho p{ D M _{ \text{{{ \cyr B } }} ,c } }\nolimi ts }(\ part i a l (M^ K)^* ) $is a *$\ Phi$-c o ns tr uctible m otiveof Ab eli an ty p e ov er $\p artial ( M^K)^ * $* (see Defini t ion \[4a\]).\ (b ) Th e mot ive $i^*j_* {} ^{{\ m atho p{\u n de rli n e{\al pha}} \n o li m its}} {{\cal V}}$ i swithou t wei ghts $$-k+1,-k+2, \ldo t s , k,$$ wh ere$ k: = \min (k_1-k_ 2, k_ 2)$. Bothw eights $ -k$ a nd $k+1$ *do* occ u r in $i^* j_* {} ^{{ \ma t h op {\underline{\ a l pha} }\ nolimit s}} {{\cal V} }$. In pa rt icular, $ {}^{{\ma th op {\ un der line{ \ alpha}}\ no lim it s}} {{\c a l V}}$ belo ngsto t h e s ub-cate g or y ${\m at ho p{CH M(M ^K )}\no limi t s}_ {{{\mat hbb{Q}}}, \pa r tial w \ ne 0,1} $ of ${\matho p{ CHM(M^K)}\ no lim its}_{ { \ mathbb{Q }}}$ if and only if ${\ m athop{\ und erlin e{\a lpha}}\no lim its}$isr egular .
The orem\[ 3Ma i n \] sh o u ld be c ompared to [ @W7 Thm. 3 .5], [@W8 T hm. 3.8], and [@CT hm. 3.6, Prop. 3 .8, Pro p | {\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal_V}}$ equal_zero in (classical, *i.e.*,_non-perverse) degrees_$\ne_r$, and_$\mu_{\bf_H}(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the_Hodge theoretic setting)_resp. $\mu_\ell(V_{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}})$ (in the $\ell$-adic_setting) in degree_$r$.\
Denote_by $j: M^K \into (M^K)^*$ the open immersion of $M^K$ into its Satake–(Baily–Borel) compactification,_by_$i: \partial_(M^K)^*_\into_(M^K)^*$ its complement, and by_$\Phi$ the natural stratification of_$\partial (M^K)^*$_(the latter will be made explicit in the_beginning_of Section \[4\]). Here_is our main result.
\[3Main\] (a) The motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal_V}}\in {\mathop{DM_{\text{{{\cyr B}}},c}}\nolimits}(\partial (M^K)^*)$ is a_*$\Phi$-constructible motive of_Abelian_type_over $\partial (M^K)^*$* (see_Definition \[4a\]).\
(b) The motive $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$_is without weights $$-k+1, -k+2, \ldots,_k,$$ where $k := \min (k_1-k_2, k_2)$._Both weights $-k$ and $k+1$ *do*_occur in $i^*j_* {}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal_V}}$. In_particular, ${}^{{\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}} {{\cal V}}$ belongs_to the sub-category_${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{{\mathbb{Q}}},\partial w_\ne 0,1}$ of_${\mathop{CHM(M^K)}\nolimits}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}$ if and only if ${\mathop{\underline{\alpha}}\nolimits}$_is regular.
Theorem \[3Main\] should_be compared to [@W7 Thm. 3.5], [@W8_Thm. 3.8],_and [@C Thm. 3.6,_Prop. 3.8,_Prop |
-1)$ undiagonalized matrix block $(**)$ above, together with a simple induction argument, we obtain plane unitary transformation $T_{n1},\ldots, T_{n,n-1},
T_{n-1,1}, \ldots, T_{n-1,n-2},\ldots, T_{31}, T_{32}$ and $T_{21}$ such that $$T^*_{21}T^*_{31}T^*_{32}T^*_{41}\ldots T^*_{n-1,1}\ldots T^*_{n-1,n-2}
T^*_{n1} \ldots T^*_{n,n-1}V = \left[\begin{matrix}
d_1\\
&d_2&&0\\
&&\ddots\\
&0&&d_n\end{matrix}\right]=D,$$ where $d_j = e^{i\alpha_j}$ for $j=1,2,\ldots, n$.
Therefore $$\begin{aligned}
V &= T_{n,n-1}, T_{n,n-2}\ldots T_{n1} T_{n-1,n-2}\ldots T_{n-1,1} \ldots
T_{32} T_{31} T_{21}D\\
&= \left(\prod^n_{i=1} \prod^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{i,j}\right)D\end{aligned}$$ and (\[eq12a\]) is proved.
References {#references.unnumbered}
==========
1. \[Ba\] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. Divincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Elementary gates for quantum computation, Physical Review A, 52(5) (1995), 3457–3467.
2. \[Cl\] R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello and M. Mosca, Quantum algorithms revisited, Proc. R. Soc. London A 454 (1998), 339–354.
3. \[Ek\] A. Ekert, Quantum interferometers as quantum computers, Phys. Scripta T | -1)$ undiagonalized matrix block $ (* *) $ above, together with a simple induction controversy, we receive plane unitary transformation $ T_{n1},\ldots, T_{n, n-1 },
T_{n-1,1 }, \ldots, T_{n-1,n-2},\ldots, T_{31 }, T_{32}$ and $ T_{21}$ such that $ $ T^*_{21}T^*_{31}T^*_{32}T^*_{41}\ldots T^*_{n-1,1}\ldots T^*_{n-1,n-2 }
T^*_{n1 } \ldots T^*_{n, n-1}V = \left[\begin{matrix }
d_1\\
& d_2&&0\\
& & \ddots\\
& 0&&d_n\end{matrix}\right]=D,$$ where $ d_j = e^{i\alpha_j}$ for $ j=1,2,\ldots, n$.
Therefore $ $ \begin{aligned }
V & = T_{n, n-1 }, T_{n, n-2}\ldots T_{n1 } T_{n-1,n-2}\ldots T_{n-1,1 } \ldots
T_{32 } T_{31 } T_{21}D\\
& = \left(\prod^n_{i=1 } \prod^{i-1}_{j=1 } T_{i, j}\right)D\end{aligned}$$ and (\[eq12a\ ]) is prove.
References { # references.unnumbered }
= = = = = = = = = =
1. \[Ba\ ] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. Divincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Elementary gates for quantum calculation, Physical Review A, 52(5) (1995), 3457–3467.
2. \[Cl\ ] R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello and M. Mosca, Quantum algorithms revisit, Proc. R. Soc. London A 454 (1998), 339–354.
3. \[Ek\ ] A. Ekert, Quantum interferometers as quantum computers, Phys. Scripta T | -1)$ unfiagonalized matrix blocy $(**)$ above, togethgr with e simpls inductkon argument, we obtain plane ubitart transformation $T_{n1},\ldogs, T_{n,n-1},
T_{n-1,1}, \pdots, T_{n-1,b-2},\ldous, T_{31}, T_{32}$ and $T_{21}$ such that $$T^*_{21}T^*_{31}B^*_{32}C^*_{41}\ldota T^*_{n-1,1}\lbovs T^*_{n-1,n-2}
T^*_{n1} \ldots J^*_{n,n-1}V = \left[\becin{matrix}
d_1\\
&d_2&&0\\
&&\ddods\\
&0&&a_n\znd{matrix}\right]=D,$$ where $d_j = e^{i\alpha_j}$ fjr $j=1,2,\ldoys, n$.
Therefore $$\bedin{akygnes}
N &= T_{n,n-1}, T_{n,n-2}\ldots T_{n1} T_{n-1,n-2}\ldots T_{n-1,1} \mdots
T_{32} U_{31} T_{21}D\\
&= \left(\prod^n_{i=1} \prpd^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{i,j}\right)D\end{aligned}$$ ajd (\[ee12a\]) is proved.
Referejces {#referebces.tbnumbered}
==========
1. \[Bx\] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. Divincenzo, N. Margoljs, P. Xhor, T. Sleqtir, U.D. Smolin, anv H. Wepnfurter, Elemcmtary cates fpr quantum comiutatmon, Physical Review A, 52(5) (1995), 3457–3467.
2. \[Cl\] R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchidvzllo and M. Mosca, Quanrun algmritvms fwvirittd, 'rod. R. Soc. Llndkn A 454 (1998), 339–354.
3. \[Ei\] A. Ekert, Qyantum interferomettrs qs quantum cojputerf, [hys. Scripta T | -1)$ undiagonalized matrix block $(**)$ above, together simple argument, we plane unitary transformation T_{31}, and $T_{21}$ such $$T^*_{21}T^*_{31}T^*_{32}T^*_{41}\ldots T^*_{n-1,1}\ldots T^*_{n-1,n-2} \ldots T^*_{n,n-1}V = \left[\begin{matrix} d_1\\ &d_2&&0\\ &0&&d_n\end{matrix}\right]=D,$$ where $d_j = e^{i\alpha_j}$ for $j=1,2,\ldots, n$. Therefore $$\begin{aligned} V &= T_{n,n-1}, T_{n1} T_{n-1,n-2}\ldots T_{n-1,1} \ldots T_{32} T_{31} T_{21}D\\ &= \left(\prod^n_{i=1} \prod^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{i,j}\right)D\end{aligned}$$ and (\[eq12a\]) proved. {#references.unnumbered} 1. A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. Divincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, H. Weinfurter, Elementary gates for quantum computation, Physical A, 52(5) (1995), 3457–3467. \[Cl\] R. Cleve, A. Ekert, Macchiavello M. Mosca, algorithms Proc. Soc. London A (1998), 339–354. 3. \[Ek\] A. Ekert, Quantum interferometers as quantum computers, Phys. Scripta T | -1)$ undiagonalized matrix block $(**)$ Above, togetHer wiTh a SimPlE indUctiOn argument, we obTAin pLane unitary transformatIon $T_{n1},\LdOTs, T_{n,N-1},
t_{n-1,1}, \Ldots, t_{n-1,n-2},\ldotS, t_{31}, T_{32}$ AND $T_{21}$ sUcH tHat $$t^*_{21}T^*_{31}t^*_{32}t^*_{41}\lDots T^*_{N-1,1}\ldOts T^*_{n-1,n-2}
T^*_{N1} \ldots T^*_{n,n-1}V = \LefT[\bEgin{matrix}
d_1\\
&d_2&&0\\
&&\DDoTs\\
&0&&d_n\end{matRix}\Right]=D,$$ where $d_J = e^{i\Alpha_j}$ FoR $j=1,2,\lDOts, n$.
THerEfore $$\Begin{aLIgned}
V &= t_{n,n-1}, T_{n,n-2}\ldoTs t_{N1} T_{n-1,n-2}\ldOTs T_{n-1,1} \ldoTS
t_{32} T_{31} t_{21}D\\
&= \leFt(\prod^n_{i=1} \prod^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{i,j}\RIgHT)D\end{aligned}$$ anD (\[eq12a\]) is PrOVeD.
rEfeRenCes {#referenCeS.unnuMBered}
==========
1. \[Ba\] a. baRENCo, C.h. bennett, R. Cleve, d.P. DivincenzO, n. MaRgolus, p. SHor, t. sleatoR, J.A. SmOlIN, anD H. WeinfurteR, EleMentary gaTes for QUantum cOMputatiOn, PhysIcaL ReView a, 52(5) (1995), 3457–3467.
2. \[cl\] r. CLevE, A. eKerT, c. MAccHIavEllo and M. moScA, QuanTum aLGORIthmS reVisiTed, PrOc. R. Soc. London A 454 (1998), 339–354.
3. \[ek\] A. ekerT, quaNtum iNterfEromEtErs as QuantuM compUtErs, Phys. Scripta T | -1)$ undiagonalized matrix block $(* *)$ a bov e,to geth er w ith a simple i n duct ion argument, we obtai n pla ne unit a ry tran sformat i on $ T_{ n1 }, \ld ot s ,T_{n, n-1 },
T_{n -1,1}, \ld ots ,T_{n-1,n-2}, \ ld ots, T_{31 },T_{32}$ and$T_ {21}$su cht hat $ $T^ *_{21 }T^*_{ 3 1}T^*_ {32}T^*_{ 41 } \ldots T^*_{n- 1 , 1} \ldo ts T^*_{n-1,n-2}T ^* _ {n1} \ldots T^ *_{n,n -1 } V= \le ft[ \begin{mat ri x}
d_ 1 \\
&d_2 & &0 \ \ &&\ d dots\\
&0&&d_ n\end{matri x }\r ight]= D, $$w here $ d_j = e ^ {i\ alpha_j}$ f or $ j=1,2,\ld ots, n $ .
Ther e fore $$ \begin {al ign ed}V & =T_{ n, n -1} , T _{n , n-2 }\ldotsT_ {n 1} T_ {n-1 , n - 2 }\ld ots T_{ n-1,1 } \ldots
T_{3 2}T_{3 1 } T _{21} D\\
& = \l ef t(\pr od^n_{ i=1}\p rod^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{ i,j}\righ t)D \e nd{ al igned } $$ and (\ [eq 12a\])is prov e d.
R e f e re nces {#references. un n u mb ered}
== ====== = =
1 . \[Ba\] A . B aren c o , C.H . Be n ne tt, R. C leve,D .P .Divince nz o, N.Ma rgo lus , P.S hor, T. Sl eator, J .A. S m olin, and H. W e infurter, Ele m en t a ry gate s f or quantumcomp u tati on,P hy sic a l Rev iew A ,5 2( 5 ) (1995), 3457–3467 .
2. \ [Cl\] R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. M a cchiavel lo a n dM . Mosca, Quant um al gorithms r e visited, Proc . R. Soc . LondonA 454 (199 8), 33 9–3 54. 3. \[Ek\] A. E k e rt,Qu antum i nte rferome ter s a s q uan tu m compute rs, Phys .Sc ri pt a T | -1)$ undiagonalized_matrix block_$(**)$ above, together with_a simple_induction_argument, we_obtain_plane unitary transformation_$T_{n1},\ldots, T_{n,n-1},
T_{n-1,1}, \ldots,_T_{n-1,n-2},\ldots, T_{31}, T_{32}$ and_$T_{21}$ such that_$$T^*_{21}T^*_{31}T^*_{32}T^*_{41}\ldots_T^*_{n-1,1}\ldots T^*_{n-1,n-2}
T^*_{n1} \ldots T^*_{n,n-1}V = \left[\begin{matrix}
d_1\\
&d_2&&0\\
&&\ddots\\
&0&&d_n\end{matrix}\right]=D,$$ where $d_j = e^{i\alpha_j}$ for $j=1,2,\ldots, n$.
Therefore $$\begin{aligned}
V_&=_T_{n,n-1}, T_{n,n-2}\ldots_T_{n1}_T_{n-1,n-2}\ldots_T_{n-1,1} \ldots
T_{32} T_{31} T_{21}D\\
&= \left(\prod^n_{i=1}_\prod^{i-1}_{j=1} T_{i,j}\right)D\end{aligned}$$ and (\[eq12a\]) is_proved.
References {#references.unnumbered}
==========
1._ \[Ba\] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve,_D.P._Divincenzo, N. Margolus,_P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter,_Elementary gates for quantum computation, Physical_Review A, 52(5)_(1995),_3457–3467.
2._ \[Cl\] R. Cleve, A._Ekert, C. Macchiavello and M. Mosca,_Quantum algorithms revisited, Proc. R. Soc. London A 454_(1998), 339–354.
3. \[Ek\] A. Ekert, Quantum_interferometers as quantum computers, Phys. Scripta T |
}_{d \times e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. The ring structure on $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ is induced by the canonical isomorphism ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1) \otimes {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1) \stackrel{{\mathsf{can}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}$. Let $\widetilde{\mathcal{A}}= \mathsf{{\mathrm{ker}}}\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{{\mathsf{tr}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}\bigr)$, where ${\mathsf{tr}}$ only involves the diagonal entries of $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ and is given by the matrix $(1, 1, \dots, 1)$. Of coarse, $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal End}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{A}}\cong {\mathsf{Ad}}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ for $\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}= {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^{\oplus e} \oplus {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)^{\oplus d}$.
4\. Consider the sheaf of algebras ${\mathcal{E}}$ on $E$ given by the short exact sequence $$0 {\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{\left(\begin{smallmatrix} \jmath \\ r \end{smallmatrix}\right)}{\longrightarrow}\pi_* \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\oplus \eta_* \bigl({\mathcal M}_n(Z)\bigr)
\xrightarrow{\bigl(\zeta^{\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}}, \; -{\mathsf{conj}}(\Theta_0)\bigr)}
\eta_*\bigl({\mathcal M}_n(\widetilde{Z})\bigr) {\longrightarrow}0,$$ where ${\mathcal M}_n(T) := {\mathcal End}_T({\mathcal{O}}_T^{\oplus n})$ for a scheme $T$. Of coarse ${\mathcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal End}_E({\mathcal{P}}_0)$, where ${\mathcal{P}}_0$ is the simple vector bundle of rank $n$ and degree $d$ on $E$ given by (\[E:univfamily\]).
5\. In the above notation we have: $$\label{E:descriptSections}
H^0\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}(1)\bigr) =
\left\{F =
\left(
\begin{ | } _ { d \times e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. The ring structure on $ \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ is induced by the canonical isomorphism $ { \mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1) \otimes { \mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1) \stackrel{{\mathsf{can}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}$. lease $ \widetilde{\mathcal{A}}= \mathsf{{\mathrm{ker}}}\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{{\mathsf{tr}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}\bigr)$, where $ { \mathsf{tr}}$ merely involves the diagonal entries of $ \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ and is yield by the matrix $ (1, 1, \dots, 1)$. Of coarse, $ \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\cong { \mathcal End}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ and $ \widetilde{\mathcal{A}}\cong { \mathsf{Ad}}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ for $ \widetilde{\mathcal{P}}= { \mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^{\oplus e } \oplus { \mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)^{\oplus d}$.
4\. Consider the bundle of algebras $ { \mathcal{E}}$ on $ E$ given by the short exact succession $ $ 0 { \longrightarrow}{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{\left(\begin{smallmatrix } \jmath \\ radius \end{smallmatrix}\right)}{\longrightarrow}\pi _ * \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\oplus \eta _ * \bigl({\mathcal M}_n(Z)\bigr)
\xrightarrow{\bigl(\zeta^{\widetilde{\mathcal{E } } }, \; -{\mathsf{conj}}(\Theta_0)\bigr) }
\eta_*\bigl({\mathcal M}_n(\widetilde{Z})\bigr) { \longrightarrow}0,$$ where $ { \mathcal M}_n(T): = { \mathcal End}_T({\mathcal{O}}_T^{\oplus n})$ for a scheme $ T$. Of coarse $ { \mathcal{E}}\cong { \mathcal End}_E({\mathcal{P}}_0)$, where $ { \mathcal{P}}_0 $ is the dim-witted vector bundle of rank $ n$ and degree $ d$ on $ E$ give by (\[E: univfamily\ ]).
5\. In the above notation we have: $ $ \label{E: descriptSections }
H^0\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}(1)\bigr) =
\left\{F =
\left (
\begin { | }_{d \tlmes e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. Tht ring structure on $\widevilde{\mafhcal{E}}$ ir induced by the canonical idonorphusm ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1) \otkmes {\mathbal{O}}_{{\mathbv{P}}^1}(1) \suackrel{{\mathsf{can}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mzbhcal{M}}_{{\nathbb{P}}^1}$. Let $\wicetilde{\matvcal{A}}= \mathsf{{\madhfm{ner}}}\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{{\matrsf{tr}}}{\lomggightarrow}{\mathsal{O}}_{{\kwthbg{I}}^1}\blgr)$, where ${\mathsf{tr}}$ only involves the diegonal entries pf $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ and id gigen by the matrix $(1, 1, \dots, 1)$. Of xoarfw, $\widetilde{\mxthcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal Ens}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ and $\widetildd{\matheal{A}}\cong {\majkwf{Af}}(\fidetilde{\mavhcal{P}})$ for $\widetilde{\mathcan{P}}= {\mathval{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^{\oplms e} \mplys {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)^{\oplns d}$.
4\. Consider the shgaf of algabxas ${\mathcal{E}}$ on $E$ givwn by tve svort wxazt aeausnce $$0 {\ponjrightarrow}{\jathcal{E}}\staxkrel{\left(\begin{smallkaegox} \jmath \\ r \snd{smajliatrix}\right)}{\longrightarrow}\pi_* \widetilde{\mauhcal{S}}\oplus \eta_* \bigl({\mathcal N}_n(Z)\bigr)
\xrightarrow{\bigp(\zeta^{\wideeilde{\mathcal{E}}}, \; -{\mathsf{conj}}(\Theta_0)\bigr)}
\eta_*\bigl({\mathcal M}_n(\wivegilbc{D})\bigf) {\llngrightarrow}0,$$ where ${\mathcal M}_n(T) := {\mathcal End}_T({\iztncsl{O}}_T^{\oplus n})$ fov a scheme $T$. Of cosrde ${\iathcal{E}}\cong {\oathcal Ehd}_E({\mathcal{P}}_0)$, where ${\lathcal{K}}_0$ is tye simple vecyor bundle of rank $n$ and detree $d$ on $E$ yivwn by (\[E:univfamily\]).
5\. Nn the above notstion we have: $$\label{E:descriptRectjons}
H^0\bigl(\wifetilde{\maffcal{E}}(1)\bigr) =
\left\{F =
\uefn(
\beghn{ | }_{d \times e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. The ring structure on induced the canonical ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1) \otimes {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1) ${\mathsf{tr}}$ involves the diagonal of $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ and given by the matrix $(1, 1, 1)$. Of coarse, $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal End}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{A}}\cong {\mathsf{Ad}}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ for $\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}= {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^{\oplus e} {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)^{\oplus d}$. 4\. Consider the sheaf of algebras ${\mathcal{E}}$ on $E$ given by short sequence {\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{\left(\begin{smallmatrix} \\ r \end{smallmatrix}\right)}{\longrightarrow}\pi_* \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\oplus \eta_* \bigl({\mathcal M}_n(Z)\bigr) \xrightarrow{\bigl(\zeta^{\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}}, \; -{\mathsf{conj}}(\Theta_0)\bigr)} \eta_*\bigl({\mathcal M}_n(\widetilde{Z})\bigr) {\longrightarrow}0,$$ where ${\mathcal M}_n(T) {\mathcal End}_T({\mathcal{O}}_T^{\oplus n})$ for a scheme $T$. Of ${\mathcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal End}_E({\mathcal{P}}_0)$, where is the simple vector bundle rank and degree on given (\[E:univfamily\]). 5\. In above notation we have: $$\label{E:descriptSections} H^0\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}(1)\bigr) = \left\{F = \left( \begin{ | }_{d \times e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. The Ring structUre on $\WidEtiLdE{\matHcal{e}}$ is induced by thE CanoNical isomorphism ${\mathcaL{O}}_{{\matHbB{p}}^1}(-1) \otiMEs {\MathcAl{O}}_{{\mathBB{P}}^1}(1) \STAckReL{{\mAthSf{CAn}}}{\LongrIghTarrow}{\mAthcal{O}}_{{\matHbb{p}}^1}$. LEt $\widetilde{\mAThCal{A}}= \mathsf{{\MatHrm{ker}}}\bigl(\wiDetIlde{\maThCal{e}}\StackRel{{\MathsF{tr}}}{\lonGRightaRrow}{\mathcAl{o}}_{{\Mathbb{p}}^1}\Bigr)$, wheRE ${\MaThsf{Tr}}$ only involves the DIaGOnal entries of $\wIdetilDe{\MAtHCAl{E}}$ And Is given by tHe MatriX $(1, 1, \Dots, 1)$. Of cOArSE, $\WIdeTIlde{\mathcal{E}}\cOng {\mathcal END}(\wiDetildE{\mAthCAl{P}})$ and $\WidetIlDE{\maThcal{A}}\cong {\mAthsF{Ad}}(\widetiLde{\matHCal{P}})$ for $\WIdetildE{\mathcAl{P}}= {\MatHcal{o}}_{{\MaThBb{P}}^1}^{\OpLUs e} \OPlUs {\mAThcAl{O}}_{{\mathbB{P}}^1}(1)^{\OpLus d}$.
4\. COnsiDER THe shEaf Of alGebraS ${\mathcal{E}}$ on $E$ gIveN by tHE shOrt exAct seQuenCe $$0 {\LongrIghtarRow}{\maThCal{E}}\stackrel{\lefT(\begIn{smallmaTriX} \jMatH \\ r \End{smALlmatrIx}\rIghT)}{\longriGhtarroW}\Pi_* \wIdETILdE{\mathcal{E}}\oplus \eta_* \bIgL({\MAtHcal M}_n(Z)\bIgr)
\xriGHtArROw{\bigl(\zeTa^{\WidEtilDE{\MathcAl{E}}}, \; -{\mAThSf{conj}}(\ThEta_0)\bigR)}
\EtA_*\bIgl({\mathCaL M}_n(\widEtIldE{Z})\bIgr) {\loNGrigHtarroW}0,$$ where ${\maThcal m}_N(T) := {\mathcal End}_T({\mAThcal{O}}_T^{\oplus n})$ FOr A SChEMe $T$. OF coArse ${\mathcal{e}}\conG {\MathCal END}_E({\MatHCal{P}}_0)$, wHere ${\mAtHCaL{p}}_0$ is the simple vector bUnDle of rAnk $n$ aNd degree $d$ on $E$ gIven by (\[E:uniVFAMily\]).
5\. In thE aboVE nOTation we have: $$\laBel{E:dEscriptSecTIons}
H^0\bigL(\wideTilde{\matHcal{E}}(1)\bigr) =
\LEFt\{F =
\left(
\bEgiN{ | }_{d \times e}({\mathcal{O }}_{{\math bb{P} }^1 }(1 )) $. T he r ing structureo n $\ widetilde{\mathcal{E}} $ isin d uced by thecanonic a li s omo rp hi sm${ \ ma thcal {O} }_{{\ma thbb{P}}^1 }(- 1) \otimes {\m a th cal{O}}_{{ \ma thbb{P}}^1}( 1)\stack re l{{ \ maths f{c an}}} {\long r ightar row}{\mat hc a l{O}}_ { {\mathb b { P} }^1} $. Let $\widetild e {\ m athcal{A}}= \m athsf{ {\ m at h r m{k er} }}\bigl(\w id etild e {\mathc a l{ E } } \st a ckrel{{\maths f{tr}}}{\lo n gri ghtarr ow }{\ m athcal {O}}_ {{ \ mat hbb{P}}^1}\ bigr )$, where ${\ma t hsf{tr} } $ onlyinvolv esthe dia g on al en tr i eso f$\w i det ilde{\ma th ca l{E}} $ an d i s giv enby t he ma trix $(1, 1,\do ts,1 )$. Of c oarse , $\ wi detil de{\ma thcal {E }}\cong {\mathc al E nd}(\wide til de {\m at hcal{ P }})$ a nd$\w idetild e{\math c al{ A} } \ c on g {\mathsf{Ad}}(\w id e t il de{\math cal{P} } )$ f o r $\wide ti lde {\ma t h cal{P }}={ \m athcal{O }}_{{\ m at hb b{P}}^1 }^ {\oplu se}\op lus { \ math cal{O} }_{{\mat hbb{P } }^1}(1)^{\oplu s d}$.
4\. Co n si d e rt he s hea f of algebr as $ { \mat hcal { E} }$o n $E$ give nb yt he short exact sequ en ce $$0 {\lo ngrightarrow} {\mathcal{ E } } \stackre l{\l e ft ( \begin{smallma trix} \jmath \\ r \end{s mallm atrix}\r ight)}{\l o n grightar row }\p i_* \w i d et ilde{\mathcal { E }}\o pl us \eta _*\bigl({ \ma thc alM}_ n( Z)\bigr)\xrighta rr ow {\ bi gl( \zeta ^ {\wideti ld e{\ ma thc al{E} } }, \; -{\m aths f{ co n j}} (\Theta _ 0) \ b igr) }\e ta_* \bi gl ({\ma thca l M} _n(\wid etilde{Z} )\b i gr){\ lo ngright arrow}0,$$ wh er e ${\mathc al M} _n(T): = {\mathc al End}_T({\mathcal{O}} _ T^{\opl usn})$fora scheme$T$ . Of c oar s e ${\m athcal {E}}\ co ng{ \ mathc a l E nd} _E ({\mathcal { P }}_ 0)$,wh ere${\math cal{P}}_0$ is thes imp le vector bun dle ofr a nk $n $ a n d d eg r ee$ d $ on $E$ givenby (\[E:un iv f am ily\]).
5 \ . I nthe abo ve nota tionw e have: $$\label {E:descri pt Sect i o ns}
H^0\bigl( \widetil de{\mathc a l{E}} ( 1) \bigr ) =
\left \{ F =
\lef t(
\be g in{ | }_{d \times_e}({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1))$. The_ring structure on $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$_is induced_by_the canonical_isomorphism_${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(-1) \otimes {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)_\stackrel{{\mathsf{can}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}$. Let $\widetilde{\mathcal{A}}=_\mathsf{{\mathrm{ker}}}\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{{\mathsf{tr}}}{\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}\bigr)$, where ${\mathsf{tr}}$ only_involves the diagonal_entries_of $\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}$ and is given by the matrix $(1, 1, \dots, 1)$. Of coarse,_$\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\cong_{\mathcal End}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$_and_$\widetilde{\mathcal{A}}\cong_{\mathsf{Ad}}(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}})$ for $\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}= {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^{\oplus e}_\oplus {\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}(1)^{\oplus d}$.
4\. Consider the_sheaf of_algebras ${\mathcal{E}}$ on $E$ given by the short_exact_sequence $$0 {\longrightarrow}{\mathcal{E}}\stackrel{\left(\begin{smallmatrix}_\jmath \\ r \end{smallmatrix}\right)}{\longrightarrow}\pi_* \widetilde{\mathcal{E}}\oplus \eta_* \bigl({\mathcal M}_n(Z)\bigr)
\xrightarrow{\bigl(\zeta^{\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}}, \;_ -{\mathsf{conj}}(\Theta_0)\bigr)}
\eta_*\bigl({\mathcal M}_n(\widetilde{Z})\bigr) {\longrightarrow}0,$$ where ${\mathcal_M}_n(T) := {\mathcal_End}_T({\mathcal{O}}_T^{\oplus_n})$_for a scheme $T$._Of coarse ${\mathcal{E}}\cong {\mathcal End}_E({\mathcal{P}}_0)$, where_${\mathcal{P}}_0$ is the simple vector bundle_of rank $n$ and degree $d$ on_$E$ given by (\[E:univfamily\]).
5\. In the_above notation we have: $$\label{E:descriptSections}
H^0\bigl(\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}(1)\bigr)_=
\left\{F =
\left(
\begin{ |
in M_{ns}(F')$, $\rho(q)>\lambda$.\
Suppose further that for some $j\in\{1,\cdots,ns\}$, the $j$’th entries of $d_1,\cdots,d_r$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $\lambda^+$. Then $e_ja_i=0$ for all $i=1,\cdots,r$.
Firstly, since $d_{1,j},\cdots,d_{r,j}$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $\lambda^+$, it follows immediately that $e_jd_1,\cdots,e_jd_r$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $\lambda^+$. And:
$0=(e_jd_1)^{p^m}a_1+\cdots+(e_jd_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{p^m})$
For convenience, set $d_i':=e_jd_i$, and in a similar vein to the proof of Theorem \[special-GPP\], define the following matrices:
$D_m:=\left(\begin{array}{cccccc} d_1'^{p^m} & d_2'^{p^m} &. &. & d_r'^{p^m}\\
d_1'^{p^{m+1}} & d_2'^{p^{m+1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+1}}\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
d_1'^{p^{m+t-1}} & d_2'^{p^{m+t-1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+t-1}}\end{array}\right)$, $\underline{a}:=\left(\begin{array}{c}a_1\\
a_2\\
.\\
.\\
.\\
a_r\end{array}\right)$\
Then we can rewrite our expression as:
$0=D_m\underline{a}+\left(\begin{array}{c} O(e_jaq^{p^m})\\
O(e_jaq^{p^{m+1}})\\
. | in M_{ns}(F')$, $ \rho(q)>\lambda$.\
Suppose further that for some $ j\in\{1,\cdots, ns\}$, the $ j$’th entries of $ d_1,\cdots, d_r$ are $ \mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $ \lambda^+$. Then $ e_ja_i=0 $ for all $ i=1,\cdots, r$.
first, since $ d_{1,j},\cdots, d_{r, j}$ are $ \mathbb{F}_p$-linearly autonomous modulo $ \lambda^+$, it stick to immediately that $ e_jd_1,\cdots, e_jd_r$ are $ \mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $ \lambda^+$. And:
$ 0=(e_jd_1)^{p^m}a_1+\cdots+(e_jd_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{p^m})$
For public toilet, determine $ d_i':=e_jd_i$, and in a similar vein to the proof of Theorem \[special - GPP\ ], specify the following matrix:
$ D_m:=\left(\begin{array}{cccccc } d_1'^{p^m } & d_2'^{p^m } &. &. & d_r'^{p^m}\\
d_1'^{p^{m+1 } } & d_2'^{p^{m+1 } } &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+1}}\\
. &. &. &. & .\\
. &. &. &. & .\\
d_1'^{p^{m+t-1 } } & d_2'^{p^{m+t-1 } } &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+t-1}}\end{array}\right)$, $ \underline{a}:=\left(\begin{array}{c}a_1\\
a_2\\
.\\
.\\
.\\
a_r\end{array}\right)$\
Then we can rewrite our expression as:
$ 0 = D_m\underline{a}+\left(\begin{array}{c } O(e_jaq^{p^m})\\
O(e_jaq^{p^{m+1}})\\
. | in L_{ns}(F')$, $\rho(q)>\lambda$.\
Suppose fmrther that for some $j\ii\{1,\cdots,na\}$, the $j$’tf entries of $d_1,\cdots,d_r$ are $\mavhbb{D}_p$-lintcrly independent modjlo $\lambdw^+$. Then $e_ha_i=0$ hor all $i=1,\cdots,r$.
Fmdstly, sluce $d_{1,n},\gdots,b_{r,o}$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-llnearly indapendent modulm $\ualbda^+$, it follows immediately that $e_jq_1,\cdots,e_kd_g$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-jineswly jndependent modulo $\lambda^+$. And:
$0=(e_jd_1)^{p^m}z_1+\cdots+(e_od_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{p^m})$
Fpr convenience, set $d_i':=e_jd_i$, wnd ln a similar vein ho the prood of Rheorem \[speckal-GPP\], defpue the follkwing matrices:
$D_m:=\left(\begin{array}{czcccc} d_1'^{p^m} & d_2'^{p^m} &. &. & d_r'^{o^k}\\
d_1'^{p^{m+1}} & d_2'^{p^{m+1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{i+1}}\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
d_1'^{p^{m+b-1}} & d_2'^{p^{m+t-1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{k+t-1}}\end{array}\righb)$, $\undxrlibe{a}:=\left(\begin{array}{c}a_1\\
a_2\\
.\\
.\\
.\\
a_c\end{array}\right)$\
Then wg can rewrhtz our expression as:
$0=D_m\yneerlite{a}+\laft(\bdtin{xrrzy}{r} O(s_jaq^{p^m})\\
L(e_jeq^{p^{m+1}})\\
. | in M_{ns}(F')$, $\rho(q)>\lambda$.\ Suppose further that for the entries of are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent all Firstly, since $d_{1,j},\cdots,d_{r,j}$ $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo it follows immediately that $e_jd_1,\cdots,e_jd_r$ are independent modulo $\lambda^+$. And: $0=(e_jd_1)^{p^m}a_1+\cdots+(e_jd_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{p^m})$ For convenience, set $d_i':=e_jd_i$, and in a similar to the proof of Theorem \[special-GPP\], define the following matrices: $D_m:=\left(\begin{array}{cccccc} d_1'^{p^m} & &. & d_1'^{p^{m+1}} d_2'^{p^{m+1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+1}}\\ . &. &. &. &.\\ . &. &. &. &.\\ d_1'^{p^{m+t-1}} d_2'^{p^{m+t-1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+t-1}}\end{array}\right)$, $\underline{a}:=\left(\begin{array}{c}a_1\\ a_2\\ .\\ .\\ a_r\end{array}\right)$\ Then we rewrite our expression as: $0=D_m\underline{a}+\left(\begin{array}{c} O(e_jaq^{p^{m+1}})\\ | in M_{ns}(F')$, $\rho(q)>\lambda$.\
Suppose fuRther that fOr somE $j\iN\{1,\cdOtS,ns\}$, tHe $j$’tH entries of $d_1,\cdoTS,d_r$ aRe $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly indePendeNt MOdulO $\LaMbda^+$. THen $e_ja_i=0$ FOr ALL $i=1,\cDoTs,R$.
FiRsTLy, Since $D_{1,j},\cDots,d_{r,j}$ Are $\mathbb{F}_P$-liNeArly independENt Modulo $\lambDa^+$, iT follows immeDiaTely thAt $E_jd_1,\CDots,e_Jd_r$ Are $\maThbb{F}_p$-LInearlY independEnT Modulo $\LAmbda^+$. AnD:
$0=(E_Jd_1)^{P^m}a_1+\cDots+(e_jd_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{P^M})$
FOR convenience, seT $d_i':=e_jd_I$, aND iN A SimIlaR vein to the PrOof of tHeorem \[sPEcIAL-gPP\], DEfine the folloWing matriceS:
$d_m:=\lEft(\begIn{ArrAY}{cccccC} d_1'^{p^m} & d_2'^{P^m} &. &. & D_R'^{p^m}\\
D_1'^{p^{m+1}} & d_2'^{p^{m+1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+1}}\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
d_1'^{P^{m+t-1}} & d_2'^{P^{m+t-1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+t-1}}\eNd{arraY}\Right)$, $\unDErline{a}:=\Left(\beGin{ArrAy}{c}a_1\\
A_2\\
.\\
.\\
.\\
A_r\EnD{arRaY}\RigHT)$\
THen WE caN rewrite OuR eXpresSion AS:
$0=d_M\UndeRliNe{a}+\lEft(\beGin{array}{c} O(e_jaQ^{p^m})\\
o(e_jaQ^{P^{m+1}})\\
. | in M_{ns}(F')$, $\rho(q)>\ lambda$.\Suppo sefur th er t hatfor some $j\in \ {1,\ cdots,ns\}$, the $j$’t h ent ri e s of $d _1,\c dots,d_ r $a r e $ \m at hbb {F } _p $-lin ear ly inde pendent mo dul o$\lambda^+$. Th en $e_ja_i =0$ for all $i= 1,\ cdots, r$ .
F irstl y,since $d_{1 , j},\cd ots,d_{r, j} $ are $ \ mathbb{ F } _p $-li nearly independen t m o dulo $\lambda^ +$, it f o ll o w s i mme diately th at $e_j d _1,\cdo t s, e _ j d_r $ are $\mathbb {F}_p$-line a rly indep en den t modul o $\l am b da^ +$. And:
$ 0=(e _jd_1)^{p ^m}a_1 + \cdots+ ( e_jd_r) ^{p^m} a_r +O( e_ja q ^{ p^ m}) $For co nve n ien ce, set$d _i ':=e_ jd_i $ , a nd i n a sim ilarvein to the p roo f of The orem\[spe cial -G PP\], defin e the f ollowing matric es:
$D_m:=\l eft (\ beg in {arra y }{cccc cc} d_ 1'^{p^m } & d_2 ' ^{p ^m } & .&. & d_r'^{p^m}\\d_ 1 ' ^{ p^{m+1}} & d_2 ' ^{ p^ { m+1}} &. & . & d_r ' ^ {p^{m +1}} \ \. &. &.&. &.\ \
. & . &. &. & .\\
d_ 1' ^{p ^{m +t-1} } & d _2'^{p ^{m+t-1} } &.& . & d_r'^{p^{m + t-1}}\end{arr a y} \ r ig h t)$, $\ underline{a }:=\ l eft( \beg i n{ arr a y}{c} a_1\\
a _ 2\ \
.\\
.\\
.\\
a_r\en d{ array} \righ t)$\
Then wecan rewrit e o ur expre ssio n a s :
$0=D_m\unde rline {a}+\left( \ begin{ar ray}{ c} O(e_j aq^{p^m}) \ \
O(e_jaq ^{p ^{m +1} })\ \ . | in M_{ns}(F')$,_$\rho(q)>\lambda$.\
Suppose further_that for some $j\in\{1,\cdots,ns\}$,_the $j$’th_entries_of $d_1,\cdots,d_r$_are_$\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo_$\lambda^+$. Then $e_ja_i=0$_for all $i=1,\cdots,r$.
Firstly, since_$d_{1,j},\cdots,d_{r,j}$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly_independent_modulo $\lambda^+$, it follows immediately that $e_jd_1,\cdots,e_jd_r$ are $\mathbb{F}_p$-linearly independent modulo $\lambda^+$. And:
$0=(e_jd_1)^{p^m}a_1+\cdots+(e_jd_r)^{p^m}a_r+O(e_jaq^{p^m})$
For convenience,_set_$d_i':=e_jd_i$, and_in_a_similar vein to the proof_of Theorem \[special-GPP\], define the_following matrices:
$D_m:=\left(\begin{array}{cccccc}_d_1'^{p^m} & d_2'^{p^m} &. &. & d_r'^{p^m}\\
d_1'^{p^{m+1}} &_d_2'^{p^{m+1}}_&. &. &_d_r'^{p^{m+1}}\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
. &. &. &. &.\\
d_1'^{p^{m+t-1}}_& d_2'^{p^{m+t-1}} &. &. & d_r'^{p^{m+t-1}}\end{array}\right)$,_$\underline{a}:=\left(\begin{array}{c}a_1\\
a_2\\
.\\
.\\
.\\
a_r\end{array}\right)$\
Then we can_rewrite_our_expression as:
$0=D_m\underline{a}+\left(\begin{array}{c} O(e_jaq^{p^m})\\
O(e_jaq^{p^{m+1}})\\
. |
1. The Lagrangian of general relativity is $\frac1{16\pi}R$. So the constant in $Z^{abcd}$ field is $$\alpha=1\,.$$
2. New Massive Gravity is obtained by taking $a=\frac1 {16\pi}$,$b=\frac{-3}{16\pi 8m^2 }$, $c=\frac1{16\pi m^2}$ and $d=0$ [@Bergshoeff:2009hq], so $$\alpha=\left(1+\frac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 }\right)\,.$$
Flat Space Cosmologies
======================
Charges and Entropy
-------------------
Now we turn to the case of flat space cosmologies (see [@Barnich:2012aw; @Cornalba:2002fi] and references therein) $$ds^2 = -2 dr du+8 M du^2+8 J du d\phi+r^2 d\phi^2$$ with $M>0$ and $J\neq 0$. The cosmological horizon is located in $r_c=\sqrt{2J^2/M}$. The asymptotic Killing vectors associated to the boundary conditions described in [@Barnich:2006av] are $$l_n=e^{i n \phi }i n u \partial_u -i n r\pr\left(1+n^2\frac{u}{r}\right)\pf\,,\quad
m_n=i e^{i n \phi }\partial_u\,.$$ The associated charges $L_n,M_n$ satisfy the BMS$_3$ algebra. We show that the charges are always the same regardless of the theory. Indeed, in these solutions, $R=R_{\mu\nu}=0$ and covariant derivatives of the Ricci all vanish, fixing completely $Z^{abcd}$. Its term $i=0$ takes the derivatives with respect to the Ricci tensors. To have a non zero contribution, we need at least and at most one Ricci tensor, because if it is multiplied by any ingredient of the Lagrangian apart from the metric, it will no contribute on-shell. The terms $i>0$ are always zero by the same argument as for BTZ. So in general, the $Z^{abcd}$ field is of the form $$Z^{abcd}=\frac1{32\pi}\left | 1. The Lagrangian of general relativity is $ \frac1{16\pi}R$. So the constant in $ Z^{abcd}$ field is $ $ \alpha=1\,.$$
2. New Massive Gravity is obtained by take $ a=\frac1 { 16\pi}$,$b=\frac{-3}{16\pi 8m^2 } $, $ c=\frac1{16\pi m^2}$ and $ d=0 $ [ @Bergshoeff:2009hq ], therefore $ $ \alpha=\left(1+\frac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 } \right)\,.$$
Flat Space Cosmologies
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Charges and Entropy
-------------------
Now we turn to the lawsuit of flat space cosmology (experience [ @Barnich:2012aw; @Cornalba:2002fi ] and references therein) $ $ ds^2 = -2 dr du+8 M du^2 + 8 J du d\phi+r^2 d\phi^2$$ with $ M>0 $ and $ J\neq 0$. The cosmologic horizon is located in $ r_c=\sqrt{2J^2 / M}$. The asymptotic Killing vectors consociate to the boundary conditions described in [ @Barnich:2006av ] are $ $ l_n = e^{i n \phi } i n u \partial_u -i n r\pr\left(1+n^2\frac{u}{r}\right)\pf\,,\quad
m_n = i e^{i n \phi } \partial_u\,.$$ The consociate charges $ L_n, M_n$ satisfy the BMS$_3 $ algebra. We show that the charges are always the like regardless of the theory. Indeed, in these solutions, $ R = R_{\mu\nu}=0 $ and covariant derivative of the Ricci all vanish, fixing wholly $ Z^{abcd}$. Its term $ i=0 $ necessitate the derivatives with regard to the Ricci tensors. To have a non zero contribution, we need at least and at most one Ricci tensor, because if it is breed by any ingredient of the Lagrangian apart from the metric, it will no contribute on - shell. The terms $ i>0 $ are always zero by the same argument as for BTZ. So in general, the $ Z^{abcd}$ field is of the form $ $ Z^{abcd}=\frac1{32\pi}\left | 1. Tje Lagrangian of general relativity is $\yeac1{16\pi}R$. So ths constavt in $Z^{abcd}$ field is $$\alpha=1\,.$$
2. Iew Nassice Gravity is obtained by takinh $a=\frac1 {16\pi}$,$b=\fcac{-3}{16\pi 8m^2 }$, $c=\frac1{16\pi m^2}$ and $d=0$ [@Bergsgleff:2009kq], so $$\alpha=\left(1+\ftac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 }\richt)\,.$$
Flat Space Wormllogies
======================
Charges and Entropy
-------------------
Now we tuwn to tne case of flat fpact cjsmomogies (see [@Barnich:2012aw; @Cornalba:2002fi] ans refertnces therein) $$ds^2 = -2 dr du+8 M du^2+8 J du d\phi+r^2 d\phl^2$$ wihh $M>0$ and $J\neq 0$. The cosmologicql hjeizon is locxted in $r_c=\sqrt{2J^2/M}$. The aaymptotic Killing vectors assockated to the boouearj conditions descgibed in [@Barnlbh:2006av] ara $$l_n=e^{i m \phi }i n u \pavtial_n -i b r\pr\left(1+n^2\frac{u}{r}\right)\'f\,,\quad
m_n=i e^{i n \phi }\kartial_u\,.$$ Tve associated chargws $L_n,M_n$ sathsfy rhe BMA$_3$ elgsbra. Wf siow that ths charges aee always the same tedqrdless of ths theowy. Indeed, in these solutions, $R=R_{\mu\nu}=0$ and cmvadiant derivatives of thw Ricci all vanish, fiding compjetely $Z^{abcd}$. Its term $i=0$ takes the derivatives witv res'ezt uo the Fucfi tensors. To have a non zero contribution, we hetd st least and ab most one Ricci trndot, because if ij is multillied by any ingrefient os the Lagrangiwn alart from the metric, it wilo no contriblte in-shell. The terms $n>0$ are always zerp by yhe same argument as fox BTZ. Ao in generwl, the $Z^{agzd}$ field is of tfe nork $$Z^{abcd}=\frac1{32\pi}\left | 1. The Lagrangian of general relativity is the in $Z^{abcd}$ is $$\alpha=1\,.$$ 2. by $a=\frac1 {16\pi}$,$b=\frac{-3}{16\pi 8m^2 $c=\frac1{16\pi m^2}$ and [@Bergshoeff:2009hq], so $$\alpha=\left(1+\frac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 }\right)\,.$$ Space Cosmologies ====================== Charges and Entropy ------------------- Now we turn to the case flat space cosmologies (see [@Barnich:2012aw; @Cornalba:2002fi] and references therein) $$ds^2 = -2 dr M J d\phi+r^2 with $M>0$ and $J\neq 0$. The cosmological horizon is located in $r_c=\sqrt{2J^2/M}$. The asymptotic Killing vectors to the boundary conditions described in [@Barnich:2006av] are n \phi }i n \partial_u -i n r\pr\left(1+n^2\frac{u}{r}\right)\pf\,,\quad m_n=i n }\partial_u\,.$$ The charges satisfy BMS$_3$ algebra. We that the charges are always the same regardless of the theory. Indeed, in these solutions, $R=R_{\mu\nu}=0$ and derivatives of all vanish, completely Its $i=0$ takes the respect to the Ricci tensors. To zero contribution, we need at least and at one Ricci because if it is multiplied by ingredient of the Lagrangian apart from the metric, will no contribute on-shell. The terms $i>0$ are always zero by the same argument as So in general, the field is of form | 1. The Lagrangian of general relAtivity is $\fRac1{16\pi}r$. So The CoNstaNt in $z^{abcd}$ field is $$\alPHa=1\,.$$
2. NeW Massive Gravity is obtaiNed by TaKIng $a=\FRaC1 {16\pi}$,$b=\fRac{-3}{16\pi 8m^2 }$, $c=\FRaC1{16\PI m^2}$ aNd $D=0$ [@BErgShOEfF:2009hq], so $$\AlpHa=\left(1+\fRac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 }\rigHt)\,.$$
FLaT Space CosmolOGiEs
======================
Charges aNd ENtropy
-------------------
Now we tUrn To the cAsE of FLat spAce CosmoLogies (SEe [@BarnIch:2012aw; @CornAlBA:2002fi] and REferencES ThEreiN) $$ds^2 = -2 dr du+8 M du^2+8 J du d\phi+R^2 D\pHI^2$$ with $M>0$ and $J\neq 0$. THe cosmOlOGiCAL hoRizOn is locateD iN $r_c=\sqRT{2J^2/M}$. The aSYmPTOTic kIlling vectors Associated tO The BoundaRy ConDItions DescrIbED in [@barnich:2006av] arE $$l_n=e^{I n \phi }i n u \pArtial_U -I n r\pr\leFT(1+n^2\frac{u}{R}\right)\Pf\,,\qUad
M_n=i e^{I N \pHi }\ParTiAL_u\,.$$ THE aSsoCIatEd chargeS $L_N,M_N$ satiSfy tHE bms$_3$ algEbrA. We sHow thAt the charges aRe aLwayS The Same rEgardLess Of The thEory. InDeed, iN tHese solutions, $R=R_{\Mu\nu}=0$ And covariAnt DeRivAtIves oF The RicCi aLl vAnish, fiXing comPLetElY $z^{ABcD}$. Its term $i=0$ takes the dErIVAtIves with RespecT To ThE ricci tenSoRs. TO havE A Non zeRo coNTrIbution, wE need aT LeAsT and at mOsT one RiCcI teNsoR, becaUSe if It is muLtiplied By any INgredient of the lAgrangian aparT FrOM ThE MetrIc, iT will no contRibuTE on-sHell. tHe TerMS $i>0$ are AlwayS zERo BY the same argument as fOr bTZ. So iN geneRal, the $Z^{abcd}$ fiEld is of the FORM $$Z^{abcd}=\frAc1{32\pi}\LEfT | 1. The Lagrangian of gene ral relati vityis$\f ra c1{1 6\pi }R$. So the co n stan t in $Z^{abcd}$ fieldis $$ \a l pha= 1 \, .$$
2. New Ma s s ive G ra vit yi sobtai ned by tak ing $a=\fr ac1 { 16\pi}$,$b=\ f ra c{-3}{16\p i 8 m^2 }$, $c=\ fra c1{16\ pi m^ 2 }$ an d $ d=0$[@Berg s hoeff: 2009hq],so $$\alp h a=\left ( 1 +\ frac {1}{2 \ell^2 m^2} \r i ght)\,.$$
Fla t Spac eC os m o log ies
========= == ===== = =====
C ha r g e s a n d Entropy
--- ----------- - --- -
Now w e t u rn tothe c as e of flat space cos mologies(see [ @ Barnich : 2012aw; @Corn alb a:2 002f i ]an d r ef e ren c es th e rei n) $$ds^ 2=-2 dr du+ 8 M du^2 +8J du d\ph i+r^2 d\phi^2 $$with $M> 0$ an d $J\ neq0$ . The cosmo logic al horizon is loc ated in $r_c= \sq rt {2J ^2 /M}$. The as ymp tot ic Kill ing vec t ors a s s o ci ated to the bounda ry c on ditionsdescri b ed i n [@Barni ch :20 06av ] are $ $l_n = e^ {i n \ph i }i n u\p artial_ u-i n r \p r\l eft (1+n^ 2 \fra c{u}{r }\right) \pf\, , \quad
m_n=i e ^ {i n \phi }\p a rt i a l_ u \,.$ $ T he associat ed c h arge s $L _ n, M_n $ sati sfy t he BM S $_3$ algebra. We sh ow thatthe c harges are al ways the s a m e regardl esso ft he theory. Ind eed,in these s o lutions, $R=R _{\mu\nu }=0$ andc o variantder iva tiv eso f t he Ricci allv a nish ,fixingcom pletely $Z ^{a bcd }$. I ts term $ i=0$ tak es t he d eri vativ e s with r es pec ttothe R i cci te nsors . To h av e anon zer o c o n trib ut io n, w e n ee d atleas t an d at mo st one Ri cci tens or ,because if it is mul ti plied by a ny in gredie n t of theLagrangian apart from t h e metri c,it wi ll n o contrib ute on-sh ell . The t erms $ i>0$ar e a l w ays z e r obyth e same arg u m ent as f or BTZ . So in general, the $Z^{ a bcd }$ field is o f t he f o r m$$Z ^ {a b cd} =\ f rac 1 { 32\pi}\left | 1. _The Lagrangian_of general relativity is_$\frac1{16\pi}R$. So_the_constant in_$Z^{abcd}$_field is $$\alpha=1\,.$$
2._ New Massive_Gravity is obtained by_taking $a=\frac1 {16\pi}$,$b=\frac{-3}{16\pi_8m^2_}$, $c=\frac1{16\pi m^2}$ and $d=0$ [@Bergshoeff:2009hq], so $$\alpha=\left(1+\frac{1}{2 \ell^2 m^2 }\right)\,.$$
Flat Space Cosmologies
======================
Charges and_Entropy
-------------------
Now_we turn_to_the_case of flat space cosmologies_(see [@Barnich:2012aw; @Cornalba:2002fi] and references_therein) $$ds^2_= -2 dr du+8 M du^2+8 J du_d\phi+r^2_d\phi^2$$ with $M>0$_and $J\neq 0$. The cosmological horizon is located in_$r_c=\sqrt{2J^2/M}$. The asymptotic Killing vectors associated_to the boundary_conditions_described_in [@Barnich:2006av] are $$l_n=e^{i_n \phi }i n u \partial_u_-i n r\pr\left(1+n^2\frac{u}{r}\right)\pf\,,\quad
m_n=i e^{i n_\phi }\partial_u\,.$$ The associated charges $L_n,M_n$ satisfy_the BMS$_3$ algebra. We show that_the charges are always the_same regardless_of the theory. Indeed, in_these solutions, $R=R_{\mu\nu}=0$_and covariant_derivatives of the_Ricci all vanish, fixing completely $Z^{abcd}$._Its term $i=0$_takes the derivatives with respect to_the_Ricci tensors. To_have_a_non zero_contribution, we need_at_least and_at_most one Ricci tensor, because if_it_is multiplied by any ingredient of the_Lagrangian apart from the_metric,_it will no contribute_on-shell. The terms $i>0$ are_always zero by the same argument_as for_BTZ. So_in general, the $Z^{abcd}$ field is of the form $$Z^{abcd}=\frac1{32\pi}\left |
)$ will always stand for the quotient $F(1,p^C(G_f))$, but for clarity in the figures of Sections \[sec:stretching\] and \[sec:emb\] we will continue to draw it with long vertical intervals.
Chain refinements, their composition and stretching {#sec:stretching}
===================================================
Let $f: I\to I$ be a piecewise linear surjection, $p$ an admissible $C$-permutation of $G_f$ and $\eps>0$. We call a nice planar chain $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ a *tubular $\eps$-chain with nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$* if
- $\chain^*$ is an $\eps$-neighborhood of $p^{C}(G_f)$, and
- there exists $n\in\N$ and arcs $A_1\cup \ldots \cup
A_n=p^{C}(G_f)$ such that $\ell_i$ is the $\eps$-neighborhood of $A_i$ for every $i\in\N$.
Denote a nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$ of $\chain$ by $\cN_{\chain}$. When there is no need to specify $\varepsilon$ and $\cN_{\chain}$ we just say that $\chain$ is *tubular*.
\[def:horizontal\] A planar chain $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ will be called [ *horizontal*]{} if there are $\delta>0$ and a chain of open intervals $\{l_1,
\ldots, l_n\}$ in $\R$ such that $\ell_i=l_i\times(-\delta, \delta)$ for every $i\in\{1, \ldots, n\}$.
\[rem:stretch\] Let $\chain$ be a tubular chain. There exists a homeomorphism $\widetilde{H}:\R^2\to\R^2$ such that $\widetilde{H}(\chain)$ is a horizontal chain and $\widetilde{H}^{-1}(\chain')$ is tubular for every tubular $\chain'\prec \widetilde{H}(\chain)$. Moreover, for $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ denote by $\cN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I | ) $ will always stand for the quotient $ F(1,p^C(G_f))$, but for clarity in the figures of Sections \[sec: stretching\ ] and \[sec: emb\ ] we will stay to pull back it with long vertical intervals.
range refinements, their composition and stretching { # sec: stretch }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
get $ f: I\to I$ be a piecewise linear surjection, $ p$ an admissible $ C$ -permutation of $ G_f$ and $ \eps>0$. We call a nice planar chain $ \chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ a * tubular $ \eps$-chain with nerve $ p^{C}(G_f)$ * if
- $ \chain^*$ is an $ \eps$-neighborhood of $ p^{C}(G_f)$, and
- there exist $ n\in\N$ and arcs $ A_1\cup \ldots \cup
A_n = p^{C}(G_f)$ such that $ \ell_i$ is the $ \eps$-neighborhood of $ A_i$ for every $ i\in\N$.
Denote a nerve $ p^{C}(G_f)$ of $ \chain$ by $ \cN_{\chain}$. When there be no need to specify $ \varepsilon$ and $ \cN_{\chain}$ we just say that $ \chain$ is * tubular *.
\[def: horizontal\ ] A planar chain $ \chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ will be called [ * horizontal * ] { } if there embody $ \delta>0 $ and a chain of open intervals $ \{l_1,
\ldots, l_n\}$ in $ \R$ such that $ \ell_i = l_i\times(-\delta, \delta)$ for every $ i\in\{1, \ldots, n\}$.
\[rem: stretch\ ] lease $ \chain$ be a tubular chain. There exists a homeomorphism $ \widetilde{H}:\R^2\to\R^2 $ such that $ \widetilde{H}(\chain)$ is a horizontal chain and $ \widetilde{H}^{-1}(\chain')$ is tubular for every tubular $ \chain'\prec \widetilde{H}(\chain)$. furthermore, for $ \chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ denote by $ \cN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I | )$ wipl always stand for the duotient $F(1,p^C(G_f))$, yyt for clarify in thd figures of Sections \[sec:strevchibg\] ane \[sec:emb\] we will contivue to drww it wirh libg vertical intervals.
Chajk refnnxments, their cokposition dnd stretching {#sdc:dtretching}
===================================================
Let $f: I\to I$ be a piecewisq lineat durjection, $p$ ag adkyssigle $C$-permutation of $G_f$ and $\eps>0$. We dall a iice planar chaon $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ a *tkbulwr $\eps$-chain with nfrve $p^{C}(G_f)$* id
- $\syain^*$ is an $\eos$-neighborhood of $p^{C}(G_f)$, and
- there exists $n\in\N$ and arzs $A_1\cbp \ldots \cuk
A_n=p^{C}(G_f)$ suci that $\ell_i$ is the $\eps$-neigvborhooc of $A_i$ for evcry $i\mn\N$.
Dwnote a nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$ of $\chain$ by $\cN_{\chain}$. Rhen thera ns no need to specify $\vqrepshlon$ and $\xN_{\cfaih}$ xe nust swy vhat $\chain$ js *tubular*.
\[dwf:horizontal\] A plansr bnain $\chain=\{\elm_1, \ldotf, \qll_n\}$ will be called [ *horizontal*]{} if thert are $\delta>0$ and a chain of open intervals $\{l_1,
\ldots, l_n\}$ in $\R$ fuch that $\ell_i=l_i\times(-\delta, \delta)$ for every $i\in\{1, \ldmts, n\}$.
\[ceo:stxcbch\] Uwt $\chain$ be a tubular chain. There exists a homejjotpmism $\widetilde{H}:\R^2\bo\R^2$ such that $\wideyipdr{R}(\chain)$ is a hurizonczl chain and $\widetilfe{H}^{-1}(\chaig')$ is rubular fjr efery tubular $\chain'\prec \widerilde{H}(\chain)$. Iireover, for $\chain=\{\epl_1, \ldots, \elu_n\}$ dgnote ny $\cN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I | )$ will always stand for the quotient for in the of Sections \[sec:stretching\] to it with long intervals. Chain refinements, composition and stretching {#sec:stretching} =================================================== Let I\to I$ be a piecewise linear surjection, $p$ an admissible $C$-permutation of $G_f$ $\eps>0$. We call a nice planar chain $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ a *tubular $\eps$-chain nerve if $\chain^*$ an $\eps$-neighborhood of $p^{C}(G_f)$, and - there exists $n\in\N$ and arcs $A_1\cup \ldots \cup A_n=p^{C}(G_f)$ such $\ell_i$ is the $\eps$-neighborhood of $A_i$ for every Denote a nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$ $\chain$ by $\cN_{\chain}$. When there no to specify and we say that $\chain$ *tubular*. \[def:horizontal\] A planar chain $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ will be called [ *horizontal*]{} if there are $\delta>0$ a chain intervals $\{l_1, l_n\}$ $\R$ that $\ell_i=l_i\times(-\delta, \delta)$ $i\in\{1, \ldots, n\}$. \[rem:stretch\] Let $\chain$ chain. There exists a homeomorphism $\widetilde{H}:\R^2\to\R^2$ such that is a chain and $\widetilde{H}^{-1}(\chain')$ is tubular for tubular $\chain'\prec \widetilde{H}(\chain)$. Moreover, for $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ by $\cN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I | )$ will always stand for the quotIent $F(1,p^C(G_f))$, bUt for ClaRitY iN the FiguRes of Sections \[sEC:strEtching\] and \[sec:emb\] we will ContiNuE To drAW iT with Long verTIcAL IntErVaLs.
CHaIN rEfineMenTs, their CompositioN anD sTretching {#sec:STrEtching}
===================================================
Let $F: I\tO I$ be a piecewiSe lInear sUrJecTIon, $p$ aN adMissiBle $C$-peRMutatiOn of $G_f$ and $\EpS>0$. we call A Nice plaNAR cHain $\Chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ A *TuBUlar $\eps$-chain wiTh nervE $p^{c}(g_f)$* IF
- $\ChaIn^*$ iS an $\eps$-neigHbOrhooD Of $p^{C}(G_f)$, aND
- tHERE exISts $n\in\N$ and arcS $A_1\cup \ldots \cUP
A_n=P^{C}(G_f)$ suCh ThaT $\Ell_i$ is The $\epS$-nEIghBorhood of $A_i$ For eVery $i\in\N$.
DEnote a NErve $p^{C}(G_F)$ Of $\chain$ By $\cN_{\chAin}$. wheN theRE iS nO neEd TO spECiFy $\vARepSilon$ and $\CN_{\ChAin}$ we Just SAY THat $\cHaiN$ is *tUbulaR*.
\[def:horizontaL\] A pLanaR ChaIn $\chaIn=\{\ell_1, \LdotS, \eLl_n\}$ wiLl be caLled [ *hOrIzontal*]{} if there aRe $\deLta>0$ and a chAin Of OpeN iNtervALs $\{l_1,
\ldoTs, l_N\}$ in $\r$ such thAt $\ell_i=l_I\TimEs(-\DELTa, \Delta)$ for every $i\in\{1, \ldOtS, N\}$.
\[ReM:stretch\] let $\chaIN$ bE a TUbular chAiN. ThEre eXISts a hOmeoMOrPhism $\widEtilde{h}:\r^2\tO\R^2$ Such thaT $\wIdetilDe{h}(\chAin)$ Is a hoRIzonTal chaIn and $\widEtildE{h}^{-1}(\chain')$ is tubulaR For every tubulAR $\cHAIn'\PRec \wIdeTilde{H}(\chain)$. moreOVer, fOr $\chAIn=\{\Ell_1, \LDots, \eLl_n\}$ deNoTE bY $\CN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I | )$ will always stand for t he quotien t $F( 1,p ^C( G_ f))$ , bu t for clarityi n th e figures of Sections\[sec :s t retc h in g\] a nd \[se c :e m b \]we w ill c o nt inuetodraw it with long ve rt ical interva l s.
Chain re fin ements, thei r c omposi ti ona nd st ret ching {#sec : stretc hing}
=== == = ====== = ======= = = == ==== ================= = == = ==
Let $f: I\ to I$be ap i ece wis e linear s ur jecti o n, $p$a na d m iss i ble $C$-permu tation of $ G _f$ and $ \e ps> 0 $. Wecallan ice planar cha in $ \chain=\{ \ell_1 , \ldots , \ell_n \}$ a*tu bul ar $ \ ep s$ -ch ai n wi t hner v e $ p^{C}(G_ f) $* if
- $ \ c h ain^ *$is a n $\e ps$-neighborh ood of$ p^{ C}(G_ f)$,and
- th ere ex ists$n \in\N$ and arcs $A_ 1\cup \ld ots \ cup A _ n=p^{C }(G _f) $ suchthat $\ e ll_ i$ i s t he $\eps$-neighbor ho o d o f $A_i$for ev e ry $ i \in\N$.
D eno te a n erve$p^{ C }( G_f)$ of $\cha i n$ b y $\cN_ {\ chain} $. Wh enthere is n o need to spec ify $ \ varepsilon$ an d $\cN_{\chain } $w e j u st s aythat $\chai n$ i s *tu bula r *.
\ [ def:h orizo nt a l\ ] A planar chain $\c ha in=\{\ ell_1 , \ldots, \el l_n\}$ wil l b e called [ * h or i zontal*]{} ifthere are $\del t a>0$ and a ch ain of o pen inter v a ls $\{l_ 1,
\l dot s,l _ n\ }$ in $\R$ su c h tha t$\ell_i =l_ i\times (-\ del ta, \d el ta)$ forevery $i \i n\ {1 ,\ld ots,n \}$.
\[ re m:s tr etc h\] L e t $\ch ain$be a t ub u lar chain. Th e r e ex is ts a h ome om orphi sm $ \ wid etilde{ H}:\R^2\t o\R ^ 2$ s uc hthat $\ widetilde{H}( \c hain)$ isahor izonta l chain an d $\widetilde{H}^{-1}(\ c hain')$ is tubu larfor every tu bular$\c h ain'\p rec \w ideti ld e{H } ( \chai n ) $. Mo re over, for$ \ cha in=\{ \e ll_1 , \ldot s, \ell_n\}$ denot e by $\cN_{\widet ild e{H} ( \ ch ain ) }= I | )$ will_always stand_for the quotient $F(1,p^C(G_f))$,_but for_clarity_in the_figures_of Sections \[sec:stretching\] and_\[sec:emb\] we will_continue to draw it_with long vertical_intervals.
Chain_refinements, their composition and stretching {#sec:stretching}
===================================================
Let $f: I\to I$ be a piecewise linear surjection,_$p$_an admissible_$C$-permutation_of_$G_f$ and $\eps>0$. We call_a nice planar chain $\chain=\{\ell_1,_\ldots, \ell_n\}$_a *tubular $\eps$-chain with nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$* if
- __$\chain^*$ is an_$\eps$-neighborhood of $p^{C}(G_f)$, and
- there exists $n\in\N$_and arcs $A_1\cup \ldots \cup
_ _A_n=p^{C}(G_f)$_such_that $\ell_i$ is the_$\eps$-neighborhood of $A_i$ for every $i\in\N$.
Denote_a nerve $p^{C}(G_f)$ of $\chain$ by_$\cN_{\chain}$. When there is no need to_specify $\varepsilon$ and $\cN_{\chain}$ we just_say that $\chain$ is *tubular*.
\[def:horizontal\]_A planar_chain $\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ will_be called [_*horizontal*]{} if_there are $\delta>0$_and a chain of open intervals_$\{l_1,
\ldots, l_n\}$_in $\R$ such that $\ell_i=l_i\times(-\delta, \delta)$_for_every $i\in\{1, \ldots,_n\}$.
\[rem:stretch\]_Let_$\chain$ be_a tubular chain._There_exists a_homeomorphism_$\widetilde{H}:\R^2\to\R^2$ such that $\widetilde{H}(\chain)$ is a_horizontal_chain and $\widetilde{H}^{-1}(\chain')$ is tubular for every_tubular $\chain'\prec \widetilde{H}(\chain)$. Moreover,_for_$\chain=\{\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ denote_by $\cN_{\widetilde{H}(\chain)}=I |
, ApJ, 409, 455
Canuto V. M., Mazzitelli L., 1991, ApJ, 370, 295
Christensen-Dalsgaard J. et al., 1996, Sci, 272, 1286
Dahlen F. A., Tromp J., 1998, Theoretical Global Seismology, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
Gough D. O., Vorontsov S. V., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 573
Korzennik S. G., Rabello-Soares M. C., Schou J., Larson T. P. 2013, ApJ, 772:87
Schou J., 1999, ApJ, 523, L181
Vorontsov S. V., 1991, Sov. Astron., 35, 400
Vorontsov S. V., 2006, in Fletcher K., Thompson M., eds, Beyond the Spherical Sun. ESA SP-624, Published on CDROM, p.46.1
Vorontsov S. V., Zharkov V. N., 1989, Soviet Sci. Rev. E. Astrophys. Space Phys., 7, 1
Vorontsov S. V., Jefferies S. M., 2013, ApJ, 778:75
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A. A., 1991, Nature, 349, 49
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A. A., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 32
Vorontsov S. V., Jefferies S. M., Giebink C., Schou J., 2009, Astron.Soc.Pacific Conf.Series, 416, 301
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Ayukov S. V., Gryaznov V. K., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1636 (Paper I)
The variational principle
=========================
In operator form, the equations of linear adiabatic oscillations of a spherically-symmetric star can be written as $$\rho_0\omega^2{\bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ where ${\bf u}$ is the displacement field, and linear integro-differential operator $H_0$ is defined as $$H_0{\bf u}=\nabla p'+\ | , ApJ, 409, 455
Canuto V. M., Mazzitelli L., 1991, ApJ, 370, 295
Christensen - Dalsgaard J. et al. , 1996, Sci, 272, 1286
Dahlen F. A., Tromp J., 1998, Theoretical Global Seismology, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
Gough D. O., Vorontsov S. V., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 573
Korzennik S. G., Rabello - Soares M. C., Schou J., Larson T. P. 2013, ApJ, 772:87
Schou J., 1999, ApJ, 523, L181
Vorontsov S. V., 1991, Sov. Astron. , 35, 400
Vorontsov S. V., 2006, in Fletcher K., Thompson M., eds, Beyond the Spherical Sun. ESA SP-624, Published on CDROM, p.46.1
Vorontsov S. V., Zharkov V. N., 1989, Soviet Sci. Rev. E. Astrophys. Space Phys. , 7, 1
Vorontsov S. V., Jefferies S. M., 2013, ApJ, 778:75
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A. A., 1991, Nature, 349, 49
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A. A., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 32
Vorontsov S. V., Jefferies S. M., Giebink C., Schou J., 2009, Astron. Soc. Pacific Conf. Series, 416, 301
Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Ayukov S. V., Gryaznov V. K., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1636 (Paper I)
The variational principle
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In operator form, the equation of analogue adiabatic oscillations of a spherically - symmetric asterisk can be write as $ $ \rho_0\omega^2{\bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ where $ { \bf u}$ is the displacement field, and linear integro - differential operator $ H_0 $ is define as $ $ H_0{\bf u}=\nabla p'+\ | , ApU, 409, 455
Canuto V. M., Mazzitelli L., 1991, ApJ, 370, 295
Christgnwen-Dalvgaard J. et al., 1996, Sci, 272, 1286
Dahlen F. A., Tromp J., 1998, Tieorwticao Global Seismology, Prknceton Ujiv. Presw, Prmnceton
Gough D. O., Vorontsov S. V., 1995, MNRCS, 273, 573
Korzennik S. N., Rabello-Sodres M. C., Schou J., Lcrson T. P. 2013, ApJ, 772:87
Schou J., 1999, ApJ, 523, L181
Vorontfov S. V., 1991, Dov. Astron., 35, 400
Votontspd S. B., 2006, in Fletcher K., Thompson M., eds, Begond tht Spherical Sun. ESS SP-624, Published on CDROM, p.46.1
Vlronhsov S. V., Zharkov V. N., 1989, Soviet Wci. Wwv. E. Astrophhs. Space Phys., 7, 1
Vorontskv S. V., Jefferies S. M., 2013, ApJ, 778:75
Vorongsov X. V., Baturib C. A., Kamyatnikh A. A., 1991, Nwture, 349, 49
Voronbxov S. E., Baturon V. A., Pamyatnlkh A. A., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 32
Vorontsov S. V., Jefferies S. M., Giefink C., Scvob J., 2009, Astron.Soc.Pacific Cinf.Seties, 416, 301
Vorubtsuv A. T., Bzturin V. E., Ayukov S. B., Gryaznov C. K., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1636 (Paper O)
Trv variational princypje
=========================
In operator form, the equations of lintar asiabatic oscillations od a spherically-symmettic star cwn be written as $$\rho_0\omega^2{\bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ where ${\bf u}$ is dhe dmsolaecidbt field, and linear integro-differential operatow $H_0$ ix defined as $$H_0{\nf u}=\nabla p'+\ | , ApJ, 409, 455 Canuto V. M., 1991, 370, 295 J. et al., F. Tromp J., 1998, Global Seismology, Princeton Press, Princeton Gough D. O., Vorontsov V., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 573 Korzennik S. G., Rabello-Soares M. C., Schou J., T. P. 2013, ApJ, 772:87 Schou J., 1999, ApJ, 523, L181 Vorontsov S. 1991, Astron., 400 S. V., 2006, in Fletcher K., Thompson M., eds, Beyond the Spherical Sun. ESA SP-624, Published CDROM, p.46.1 Vorontsov S. V., Zharkov V. N., Soviet Sci. Rev. E. Space Phys., 7, 1 Vorontsov V., S. M., ApJ, Vorontsov V., Baturin V. Pamyatnikh A. A., 1991, Nature, 349, 49 Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A. A., 1992, 257, 32 V., Jefferies M., C., J., 2009, Astron.Soc.Pacific 301 Vorontsov S. V., Baturin V. V., Gryaznov V. K., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1636 I) The principle ========================= In operator form, the of linear adiabatic oscillations of a spherically-symmetric star be written as $$\rho_0\omega^2{\bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ where ${\bf u}$ is the displacement field, and linear $H_0$ is defined as u}=\nabla p'+\ | , ApJ, 409, 455
Canuto V. M., Mazzitelli L., 1991, ApJ, 370, 295
christenseN-DalsGaaRd J. Et Al., 1996, ScI, 272, 1286
DahLen F. A., Tromp J., 1998, TheORetiCal Global Seismology, PriNcetoN UNIv. PrESs, princEton
GouGH D. o., vOroNtSoV S. V., 1995, mNraS, 273, 573
korzeNniK S. G., RabeLlo-Soares M. c., ScHoU J., Larson T. P. 2013, Apj, 772:87
scHou J., 1999, ApJ, 523, L181
VoRonTsov S. V., 1991, Sov. AstRon., 35, 400
vorontSoV S. V., 2006, IN FletCheR K., ThoMpson M., EDs, BeyoNd the SpheRiCAl Sun. Esa SP-624, PublISHeD on CdROM, p.46.1
Vorontsov S. V., ZHArKOv V. N., 1989, Soviet Sci. REv. E. AstRoPHyS. sPacE PhYs., 7, 1
VorontsoV S. v., JeffERies S. M., 2013, APj, 778:75
VORONtsOV S. V., Baturin V. A., PAmyatnikh A. A., 1991, nAtuRe, 349, 49
VoroNtSov s. v., BaturIn V. A., PAmYAtnIkh A. A., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 32
VOronTsov S. V., JefFeries s. m., GiebinK c., Schou J., 2009, astron.soc.pacIfic cOnF.SEriEs, 416, 301
vOroNTsOv S. v., batUrin V. A., AyUkOv s. V., GryAznoV v. k., 2013, mnRAS, 430, 1636 (papEr I)
THe varIational princIplE
=========================
In oPEraTor foRm, the EquaTiOns of Linear AdiabAtIc oscillations oF a spHerically-SymMeTriC sTar caN Be writTen As $$\rHo_0\omega^2{\Bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ WHerE ${\bF U}$ IS tHe displacement fielD, aND LiNear inteGro-difFErEnTIal operaToR $H_0$ iS defINEd as $$H_0{\Bf u}=\nABlA p'+\ | , ApJ, 409, 455
Canuto V. M., Mazzi telli L. , 1 99 1, A pJ,370, 295
Chri s tens en-Dalsgaard J. et al. , 199 6, Sci, 27 2, 12 86
Dah l en F . A ., T rom pJ ., 1998 , T heoreti cal Global Se is mology, Prin c et on Univ. P res s, Princeton
G ough D .O., Voron tso v S.V., 19 9 5, MNR AS, 273,57 3
Korz e nnik S. G ., Rab ello-Soares M. C. , S c hou J., Larson T. P. 2 0 13 , ApJ , 7 72:87
Sch ou J.,1 999, Ap J ,5 2 3 , L 1 81
Vorontsov S. V., 199 1 , S ov. As tr on. , 35, 4 00
V or o nts ov S. V., 2 006, in Fletc her K. , Thomps o n M., e ds, Be yon d t he S p he ri cal S u n.E SA SP - 624 , Publis he don CD ROM, p . 4 6.1
Vo ront sov S . V., Zharkov V. N., 198 9, So vietSci. R ev. E . Astr ophys .Space Phys., 7, 1
Vorontsov S. V .,Je fferi e s S. M .,201 3, ApJ, 778:75
Vo ro n t s ov S. V., Baturin V. A . , P amyatnik h A. A . ,19 9 1, Natur e, 34 9, 4 9
Voro ntso v S . V., Ba turinV .A. , Pamya tn ikh A. A .,199 2, MN R AS,257, 3 2
Voron tsovS . V., Jefferie s S. M., Giebi n kC . ,S chou J. , 2009, Ast ron. S oc.P acif i cCon f .Seri es, 4 16 , 3 0 1
Vorontsov S. V., B aturin V. A ., Ayukov S.V., Gryazn o v V. K., 2 013, MN R AS, 430, 1636(Pape r I)
Thev ariation al pr inciple========= = = ======== === ===
I n o p e ra tor form, the e quat io ns of l ine ar adia bat icosc ill at ions of a spheric al ly -s ym met ric s t ar can b ewri tt enas $$ \ rho_0\ omega ^2{\ bf u } =H_ 0{\bf u } ,$ $ wher e${ \bfu}$ i s the dis p lac ement f ield, and li n earin te gro-dif ferential ope ra tor $H_0$is de fineda s $$H_0{\ bf u}=\nabla p'+\ | , ApJ,_409, 455
Canuto_V. M., Mazzitelli L.,_1991, ApJ,_370,_295
Christensen-Dalsgaard J._et_al., 1996, Sci,_272, 1286
Dahlen F._A., Tromp J., 1998,_Theoretical Global Seismology,_Princeton_Univ. Press, Princeton
Gough D. O., Vorontsov S. V., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 573
Korzennik S. G.,_Rabello-Soares_M. C.,_Schou_J.,_Larson T. P. 2013, ApJ,_772:87
Schou J., 1999, ApJ, 523,_L181
Vorontsov S._V., 1991, Sov. Astron., 35, 400
Vorontsov S. V.,_2006,_in Fletcher K.,_Thompson M., eds, Beyond the Spherical Sun. ESA SP-624,_Published on CDROM, p.46.1
Vorontsov S. V.,_Zharkov V. N.,_1989,_Soviet_Sci. Rev. E. Astrophys._Space Phys., 7, 1
Vorontsov S. V.,_Jefferies S. M., 2013, ApJ, 778:75
Vorontsov_S. V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh A._A., 1991, Nature, 349, 49
Vorontsov S._V., Baturin V. A., Pamyatnikh_A. A.,_1992, MNRAS, 257, 32
Vorontsov S._V., Jefferies S._M., Giebink_C., Schou J.,_2009, Astron.Soc.Pacific Conf.Series, 416, 301
Vorontsov S._V., Baturin V._A., Ayukov S. V., Gryaznov V._K.,_2013, MNRAS, 430,_1636_(Paper_I)
The variational_principle
=========================
In operator form,_the_equations of_linear_adiabatic oscillations of a spherically-symmetric star_can_be written as $$\rho_0\omega^2{\bf u}=H_0{\bf u},$$ where_${\bf u}$ is the_displacement_field, and linear integro-differential_operator $H_0$ is defined as_$$H_0{\bf u}=\nabla p'+\ |
environment with a reduced symmetry has not been investigated,[@neupane2019plane] and its potential for realizing anisotropic modification on the electronic and optical properties of the monolayer TMDCs remains unexploited. In this letter, we report the breaking of the three-fold in-plane symmetry of the MoS$_2$ monolayer by depositing on the low-symmetry surface of sapphire, demonstrating the symmetry associated dielectric engineering of the 2D materials.
Results and Discussions
=======================
![(a)The setup of the RDS measurement and its alignment to the substrate.[]{data-label="figure1"}](Fig1.pdf){width="6cm"}
Due to their attractive properties, sapphire crystals are widely applied in solid-state device fabrications and also among the substrate candidates for 2D semiconductors.[@singh2015al2o3; @dumcenco2015large] Sapphire belongs to negative uniaxial crystals, i.e., its extraordinary dielectric function $\epsilon_e$ smaller than its ordinary dielectric function $\epsilon_o$.[@harman1994optical; @yao1999anisotropic] So far, only c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate has been used to investigate its dielectric screening effects on the monolayer TMDCs.[@yu2015exciton; @park2018direct] With isotropic in-plane dielectric properties defined by $\epsilon_o$, the underlying c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate induces a dielectric modification, which is laterally isotropic to monolayer TMDCs. In contrast, we prepared monolayer MoS$_2$ on a-plane ($11\overline{2}0$) sapphire substrate using chemical vapor deposition (CVD).[@supplemental] By selecting low symmetry a-plane sapphire as the substrate, we supply monolayer MoS$_2$ with an anisotropic dielectric environment defined by $\Delta \epsilon_{ext}=\epsilon_o-\epsilon_e$(see Fig.1). The resultant anisotropic modification was then investigate by measuring the optical anisotropy in the monolayer MoS$_2$ over the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) range using reflectance difference spectroscopy (RDS),[@aspnes1985anisotropies; @weightman2005reflection] which measures the reflectance difference between the light polarized along two orthogonal directions at close normal incidence (see Fig.1). This highly sensitive technology has been successfully applied to investigate the optical properties of ultra-narrow graphene nanoribbons.[@ | environment with a reduced symmetry has not been investigated,[@neupane2019plane ] and its potential for realizing anisotropic alteration on the electronic and ocular properties of the monolayer TMDCs remains unexploited. In this letter, we report the breaking of the three - fold in - airplane symmetry of the MoS$_2 $ monolayer by depositing on the low - isotropy airfoil of sapphire, show the symmetry associated dielectric engineering of the 2D material.
Results and Discussions
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
! [ (a)The frame-up of the RDS measurement and its alliance to the substrate.[]{data - label="figure1"}](Fig1.pdf){width="6 cm " }
Due to their attractive properties, sapphire crystals are widely apply in solid - state device fabrications and besides among the substrate candidates for 2D semiconductors.[@singh2015al2o3; @dumcenco2015large ] Sapphire belong to negative uniaxial crystal, i.e., its extraordinary dielectric function $ \epsilon_e$ smaller than its ordinary dielectric function $ \epsilon_o$.[@harman1994optical; @yao1999anisotropic ] So far, merely c - plane (0001) sapphire substrate has been used to investigate its dielectric screening effects on the monolayer TMDCs.[@yu2015exciton; @park2018direct ] With isotropic in - plane dielectric properties defined by $ \epsilon_o$, the underlying c - plane (0001) sapphire substrate induces a dielectric modification, which is laterally isotropic to monolayer TMDCs. In contrast, we prepared monolayer MoS$_2 $ on a - airplane ($ 11\overline{2}0 $) azure substrate using chemical vapor deposition (CVD).[@supplemental ] By choose depleted symmetry a - plane sapphire as the substrate, we supply monolayer MoS$_2 $ with an anisotropic dielectric environment defined by $ \Delta \epsilon_{ext}=\epsilon_o-\epsilon_e$(see Fig.1). The resultant anisotropic modification was then investigate by measure the optical anisotropy in the monolayer MoS$_2 $ over the ultraviolet - visible (UV - Vis) range using reflectance dispute spectroscopy (RDS),[@aspnes1985anisotropies; @weightman2005reflection ] which measures the reflectance difference between the light polarize along two orthogonal direction at cheeseparing normal incidence (see Fig.1). This highly sensitive technology has been successfully practice to investigate the optical properties of ultra - narrow-minded graphene nanoribbons.[@ | engironment with a reduced symmetry has not been invesfigated,[@ndupane2019plane] and its potentiap dor rtclizing anisotropic oodificatpon on thw eltctronic and optirzl propcxties lf tke monolayer TMDGs remains gnexploited. In tfid letter, we report the breaking of ehe thrre-vold in-plane simmetgy of fhe MoS$_2$ monolayer by depositing on the lox-symmetry surfave of sapphire, demonstratijg tje symmetry associwted dielecjdic wngineering uf the 2D materials.
Resumts and Discussions
=======================
![(a)The setup ow the RDS measutznenh and its almgnmenn to the subsbgate.[]{datd-label="fogure1"}](Fig1.pdf){widbh="6cm"}
Dne ti their attractive prmperties, sapphire srystals drz widely applied in silud-staje deeice dabficztmona and wlsk among ths substrate candidates for 2D stmisinductors.[@singg2015al2o3; @dtmsenco2015large] Sapphire belongs to negative unjaxial crystals, i.e., its wxtraordinary dielecttic functijn $\epsilon_e$ smaller than its ordinary dielectric xunctmov $\eksljub_o$.[@jarman1994optical; @yao1999anisotropic] So far, only c-plags (0001) sspphire substrcte has been usec ho ynvestigate ijs dielzdtdic screening effefts on jhe mobolayer TIDCs.[@uu2015exciton; @park2018direct] With iwotropic in-pjqne dielectric pro'erties defiued by $\epsikon_o$, the underlying c-plcne (0001) szpphire subdtrate insjces a dielectriz mpdhfication, which is lateraljy isotro'ic tp monolxyer TMDCs. In contradt, we prepared monolayer MoS$_2$ ln a-plane ($11\ovfrline{2}0$) sapphire substrate using chemical vapot dapovition (CRD).[@suppkemental] By sqlecting low simmetry a-'lane rapphire aa the snbstrate, we fupply monolafgr MoS$_2$ with ai anisotrjpic dieoectric dnvironment degined by $\Btlta \epsilin_{ext}=\epsilon_o-\epsilpn_e$(rse Fig.1). The resuotabt anisotropic kodkfisanioi was dhen investicate by keasufing tht oitizal snisotropy in the motolager MoS$_2$ over the uktvaviolet-vusible (UD-Vis) range usong reflectance divfereice spxctrosvopi (RDS),[@aspnes1985anisotropies; @weightmzn2005reflectlon] which measuwes bhe teflectance difference between the light polarized along two orthogobal directions at ckpse normal mncidegce (see Fhg.1). This highly sensirive technology hss been successfully zpplieg to lnvestigate the optical properties of ultra-narrow graphene nanoribbons.[@ | environment with a reduced symmetry has not and potential for anisotropic modification on of monolayer TMDCs remains In this letter, report the breaking of the three-fold symmetry of the MoS$_2$ monolayer by depositing on the low-symmetry surface of sapphire, the symmetry associated dielectric engineering of the 2D materials. Results and Discussions ======================= setup the measurement its alignment to the substrate.[]{data-label="figure1"}](Fig1.pdf){width="6cm"} Due to their attractive properties, sapphire crystals are widely applied in device fabrications and also among the substrate candidates 2D semiconductors.[@singh2015al2o3; @dumcenco2015large] Sapphire to negative uniaxial crystals, i.e., extraordinary function $\epsilon_e$ than ordinary function $\epsilon_o$.[@harman1994optical; @yao1999anisotropic] far, only c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate has been used to investigate its dielectric screening effects on the TMDCs.[@yu2015exciton; @park2018direct] in-plane dielectric defined $\epsilon_o$, underlying c-plane (0001) induces a dielectric modification, which is monolayer TMDCs. In contrast, we prepared monolayer MoS$_2$ a-plane ($11\overline{2}0$) substrate using chemical vapor deposition (CVD).[@supplemental] selecting low symmetry a-plane sapphire as the substrate, supply monolayer MoS$_2$ with an anisotropic dielectric environment defined by $\Delta \epsilon_{ext}=\epsilon_o-\epsilon_e$(see Fig.1). The resultant was then investigate by the optical anisotropy the MoS$_2$ the (UV-Vis) range reflectance difference spectroscopy (RDS),[@aspnes1985anisotropies; @weightman2005reflection] which measures the reflectance difference between light polarized along two orthogonal directions at close normal incidence This sensitive technology has successfully applied to investigate optical of ultra-narrow graphene nanoribbons.[@ | environment with a reduced syMmetry has nOt beeN inVesTiGateD,[@neuPane2019plane] and itS PoteNtial for realizing anisoTropiC mODifiCAtIon on The elecTRoNIC anD oPtIcaL pROpErtieS of The monoLayer TMDCs RemAiNs unexploiteD. in This letter, We rEport the breaKinG of the ThRee-FOld in-PlaNe symMetry oF The MoS$_2$ Monolayer By DEpositINg on the LOW-sYmmeTry surface of sapphIRe, DEmonstrating thE symmeTrY AsSOCiaTed Dielectric EnGineeRIng of thE 2d mATERiaLS.
Results and DiScussions
=======================
![(a)THE seTup of tHe rDS MEasureMent aNd ITs aLignment to tHe suBstrate.[]{daTa-labeL="Figure1"}](FIG1.pdf){widTh="6cm"}
DuE to TheIr atTRaCtIve PrOPerTIeS, saPPhiRe crystaLs ArE wideLy apPLIED in sOliD-staTe devIce fabricatioNs aNd alSO amOng thE subsTratE cAndidAtes foR 2D semIcOnductors.[@singh2015aL2o3; @duMcenco2015larGe] SApPhiRe BelonGS to negAtiVe uNiaxial CrystalS, I.e., iTs EXTRaOrdinary dielectric FuNCTiOn $\epsiloN_e$ smalLEr ThAN its ordiNaRy dIeleCTRic fuNctiON $\ePsilon_o$.[@hArman1994oPTiCaL; @yao1999aniSoTropic] so Far, OnlY c-plaNE (0001) sapPhire sUbstrate Has beEN used to investiGAte its dielectRIc SCReENing EffEcts on the moNolaYEr TMdCs.[@yU2015ExCitON; @park2018DirecT] WITh ISotropic in-plane dielEcTric prOpertIes defined by $\ePsilon_o$, the UNDErlying c-PlanE (0001) SaPPhire substrate InducEs a dielectRIc modifiCatioN, which is Laterally ISOtropic tO moNolAyeR TMdcS. IN contrast, we prEPAred MoNolayer moS$_2$ On a-planE ($11\ovErlIne{2}0$) SapPhIre substrAte using ChEmIcAl VapOr depOSition (CVd).[@sUppLeMenTal] By SElectiNg low SymmEtRy A-PlaNe sapphIRe AS The sUbStRate, We sUpPly moNolaYEr MOS$_2$ with aN anisotroPic DIeleCtRiC enviroNment defined bY $\DElta \epsiloN_{eXt}=\ePsilon_O-\EPsilon_e$(sEe Fig.1). The resultant anisotROpic modIfiCatioN was Then invesTigAte by mEasURing thE opticAl aniSoTroPY In the MONoLayEr moS$_2$ over the ULTraVioleT-vIsibLe (UV-Vis) Range using reflectaNCe dIfference specTroScopY (rdS),[@AspNEs1985ANisOtROpiES; @Weightman2005reflecTion] which mEaSUrEs the refleCTanCe DiffereNce betwEen thE Light poLarized alOng two ortHoGonaL DIreCtions at clOse normaL incidencE (See FiG.1). thIs higHly SensitIvE teChnolOgy has BEen SucceSsfullY aPplied To invEsTigate thE optical properties of ultRa-narrOw graPheNe nanoribBonS.[@ | environment with a reduce d symmetry hasnot be en inv esti gated,[@neupan e 2019 plane] and its potenti al fo rr eali z in g ani sotropi c m o d ifi ca ti onon th e ele ctr onic an d opticalpro pe rties of the mo nolayer TM DCs remains une xpl oited. I n t h is le tte r, we repor t the b reaking o ft he thr e e-foldi n -p lane symmetry of theM oS $ _2$ monolayerby dep os i ti n g on th e low-symm et ry su r face of sa p p h ire , demonstratin g the symme t ryassoci at edd ielect ric e ng i nee ring of the 2Dmaterials .
Res u lts and Discuss ions
= === === ==== = == == === == = =
! [( a)T h e s etup ofth eRDS m easu r e m e nt a nditsalign ment to the s ubs trat e .[] {data -labe l="f ig ure1" }](Fig 1.pdf ){ width="6cm"}
D ue t o their a ttr ac tiv eprope r ties,sap phi re crys tals ar e wi de l y ap plied in solid-sta te d ev ice fabr icatio n san d also am on g t he s u b strat e ca n di dates fo r 2D s e mi co nductor s. [@sing h2 015 al2 o3; @ d umce nco201 5large]Sapph i re belongs ton egative uniax i al c ry s tals , i .e., its ex trao r dina ry d i el ect r ic fu nctio n$ \e p silon_e$ smaller th an its o rdina ry dielectric function$ \ e psilon_o $.[@ h ar m an1994optical; @yao 1999anisot r opic] So far, only c- plane (00 0 1 ) sapphi resub str ate h as been used to i nves ti gate it s d ielectr icscr een ing e ffects on the mon ol ay er T MDC s.[@y u 2015exci to n;@p ark 2018d i rect]Withisot ro pi c in -planed ie l e ctri cpr oper tie sdefin ed b y $\ epsilon _o$, theund e rlyi ng c -plane(0001) sapphi re substrate i ndu ces ad i electric modification, which is lateral lyisotr opic to monol aye r TMDC s.I n cont rast,we pr ep are d monol a y er Mo S$ _2$ on a-p l a ne($11\ ov erli ne{2}0$ ) sapphire substra t e u sing chemical va pord e po sit i on (CV D) . [@s u p plemental] By s electing l ow sy mmetry a-p l ane s apphire as the subs t rate, w e supplymonolayer M oS$_ 2 $ wi th an anis otropicdielectri c envi r on mentdef ined b y$\D elta\epsil o n_{ ext}= \epsil on _o-\ep silon _e $(see Fi g.1). The resultant ani sotrop ic mo dif ication w ast hen investig ateby measuri ngthe opti cal aniso trop y i n t h e mon olay e r MoS$_2$ ov ert h eultraviolet - v i sib le (U V-V i s) ran ge u sing reflectanced ifference spec tros c o py(RD S ),[@ as pnes1985anisot rop ie s ; @weight ma n2005reflec tion] wh ic h meas ures t he ref lectanc e di f ferenc e be twe en the li ght p o larized a lo n g twoorth og onal d irecti o ns a t close normal inc idenc e (seeF ig. 1). T hi s highl y sen sitive tec hnology has beensucc essfu lly app li ed toinv es tigate the optical p roper ties of u ltra -na rrow g raph e n e nan orib bo ns. [@ | environment_with a_reduced symmetry has not_been investigated,[@neupane2019plane]_and_its potential_for_realizing anisotropic modification_on the electronic_and optical properties of_the monolayer TMDCs_remains_unexploited. In this letter, we report the breaking of the three-fold in-plane symmetry of_the_MoS$_2$ monolayer_by_depositing_on the low-symmetry surface of_sapphire, demonstrating the symmetry associated_dielectric engineering_of the 2D materials.
Results and Discussions
=======================
![(a)The setup of_the_RDS measurement and_its alignment to the substrate.[]{data-label="figure1"}](Fig1.pdf){width="6cm"}
Due to their attractive properties,_sapphire crystals are widely applied in_solid-state device fabrications_and_also_among the substrate candidates_for 2D semiconductors.[@singh2015al2o3; @dumcenco2015large] Sapphire belongs_to negative uniaxial crystals, i.e., its_extraordinary dielectric function $\epsilon_e$ smaller than its_ordinary dielectric function $\epsilon_o$.[@harman1994optical; @yao1999anisotropic] So_far, only c-plane (0001) sapphire_substrate has_been used to investigate its_dielectric screening effects_on the_monolayer TMDCs.[@yu2015exciton; @park2018direct]_With isotropic in-plane dielectric properties defined_by $\epsilon_o$, the_underlying c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate induces_a_dielectric modification, which_is_laterally_isotropic to_monolayer TMDCs. In_contrast,_we prepared_monolayer_MoS$_2$ on a-plane ($11\overline{2}0$) sapphire substrate_using_chemical vapor deposition (CVD).[@supplemental] By selecting low_symmetry a-plane sapphire as_the_substrate, we supply monolayer_MoS$_2$ with an anisotropic dielectric_environment defined by $\Delta \epsilon_{ext}=\epsilon_o-\epsilon_e$(see Fig.1)._The resultant_anisotropic modification_was then investigate by measuring the optical anisotropy in the monolayer_MoS$_2$ over the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) range_using reflectance difference spectroscopy_(RDS),[@aspnes1985anisotropies; @weightman2005reflection]_which_measures the reflectance_difference_between the_light polarized along two orthogonal directions at_close normal_incidence (see Fig.1). This highly sensitive_technology has been successfully_applied_to investigate the optical properties of_ultra-narrow graphene nanoribbons.[@ |
ERT 41.82 19.48 38.30
$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in-domain) 42.10 19.70 38.53
$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ [**42.31**]{} [**19.87**]{} [**38.78**]{}
$\text{\sc Hibert}_M$ [**42.37**]{} [**19.95**]{} [**38.83**]{}
: Results of various models on the CNNDM test set using full-length F1 (R-1), <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-2</span> (R-2), and <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-L</span> (R-L).[]{data-label="tbl:cnndaily"}
Our main results on the CNNDM dataset are shown in Table \[tbl:cnndaily\], with abstractive models in the top block and extractive models in the bottom block. Pointer+Coverage [@see:2017:acl], Abstract-ML+RL [@paulus:2017:arxiv] and DCA [@celikyilmaz:2016:naacl] are all sequence to sequence learning based models with copy and coverage modeling, reinforcement learning and deep communicating agents extensions. SentRewrite [@hsu:2018:acl] and [@chen:2018:acl] all try to decompose the word by word summary generation into sentence selection from document and “sentence” level summarization (or compression). [@gehrmann:2018:emnlp] generates summaries by combines a word prediction model with the decoder attention model. The extractive models are usually based on hierarchical encoders (SummaRuNNer; @nallapati:2017:aaai and NeuSum; @cheng:2016:acl). They have been extended with reinforcement learning (Refresh; @Narayan:ea:2018 and BanditSum; @dong:2018:emnlp), Maximal Marginal Relevance (NeuSum-MMR; @zhou:2018:acl), latent variable modeling (LatentSum; @zhang:2018:emnlp) and syntactic compression (JECS; @xu:2019:arxiv). Lead3 is a baseline which simply selects the first three sentences. Our model $\text{\sc Hibert | ERT 41.82 19.48 38.30
$ \text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in - domain) 42.10 19.70 38.53
$ \text{\sc Hibert}_S$ [ * * 42.31 * * ] { } [ * * 19.87 * * ] { } [ * * 38.78 * * ] { }
$ \text{\sc Hibert}_M$ [ * * 42.37 * * ] { } [ * * 19.95 * * ] { } [ * * 38.83 * * ] { }
: Results of various model on the CNNDM trial set using full - distance F1 (R-1), < span style="font - variant: small - caps;">Rouge-2</span > (R-2), and < couple style="font - variant: small - caps;">Rouge - L</span > (R - L).[]{data - label="tbl: cnndaily " }
Our chief results on the CNNDM dataset are shown in Table \[tbl: cnndaily\ ], with abstractive model in the top block and extractive models in the bottom block. Pointer+Coverage [ @see:2017: acl ], Abstract - ML+RL [ @paulus:2017: arxiv ] and DCA [ @celikyilmaz:2016: naacl ] are all sequence to sequence learning establish models with copy and coverage modeling, reward learning and deep communicating agents extension. SentRewrite [ @hsu:2018: acl ] and [ @chen:2018: acl ] all try to decompose the word by word summary generation into conviction selection from document and “ sentence ” level summarization (or compression). [ @gehrmann:2018: emnlp ] generates summaries by combines a word prediction model with the decoder attention model. The extractive models are usually based on hierarchical encoders (SummaRuNNer; @nallapati:2017: aaai and NeuSum; @cheng:2016: acl). They have been extended with reinforcement eruditeness (Refresh; @Narayan: ea:2018 and BanditSum; @dong:2018: emnlp), Maximal Marginal Relevance (NeuSum - MMR; @zhou:2018: acl), latent variable star modeling (LatentSum; @zhang:2018: emnlp) and syntactic compression (JECS; @xu:2019: arxiv). Lead3 is a baseline which plainly selects the first three sentences. Our exemplar $ \text{\sc Hibert | ERT 41.82 19.48 38.30
$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in-domain) 42.10 19.70 38.53
$\tdxt{\sc Hibvrt}_S$ [**42.31**]{} [**19.87**]{} [**38.78**]{}
$\text{\sc Hibsvt}_M$ [**42.37**]{} [**19.95**]{} [**38.83**]{}
: Revults of variogs mldels on the CNNDM test set using ftll-lengyh F1 (R-1), <span stylg="font-nawianf:small-caps;">Rouge-2</span> (R-2), and <span styme="font-veriant:small-caps;">Touge-L</span> (R-L).[]{data-label="tbl:cjndally"}
Our main resultd on the CNBDM qqtaset are sfown in Table \[tbl:cnndajly\], with abstractive models in ghe tpp block abd exhtactive modeos in the bottom nkock. Pminter+Cpverage [@see:2017:acl], Abvtrqct-ML+RL [@paulus:2017:arxiv] aid DCA [@celikyilmaz:2016:nawcl] are anl sequence to sequwnxe ledrnitg bxwed moseks with fopb and coverzge modelint, reinforcement leatnybg and deep ckmmunisaeing agents extensions. SentRewrite [@hsu:2018:abl] ahd [@chen:2018:acl] all try to dwcompose the word by aord summwry generation into sentence selection from documant aid “seubcnce” oegel summarization (or compression). [@gehrmann:2018:emnl[] gtnegates summaries bn combines a word lrfdostion model wkth thz dscoder attention mldel. Thg extrqctive moqels are usually based on hieraechical encoberw (SummaRuNNer; @nallcpati:2017:aaai anb NeuSom; @chemg:2016:acl). They have been excended with reinflrcement mdarning (Refresh; @Varsydn:ea:2018 and BanditSum; @dong:2018:emnjp), Maximao Maxginal Rdlevsnce (NquSum-MMR; @zjou:2018:acl), latent variable mldeliug (LadentSum; @zhwng:2018:emnlp) and syntactic compressmpn (JECS; @xu:2019:arcie). Lvad3 is a yaselike which simply selects the fnrst thrze sengences. Our model $\vext{\sc Hibere | ERT 41.82 19.48 38.30 $\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in-domain) 38.53 Hibert}_S$ [**42.31**]{} [**38.78**]{} $\text{\sc Hibert}_M$ of models on the test set using F1 (R-1), <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-2</span> (R-2), and style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-L</span> (R-L).[]{data-label="tbl:cnndaily"} Our main results on the CNNDM dataset are shown in Table with abstractive models in the top block and extractive models in the bottom Pointer+Coverage Abstract-ML+RL and [@celikyilmaz:2016:naacl] are all sequence to sequence learning based models with copy and coverage modeling, reinforcement learning deep communicating agents extensions. SentRewrite [@hsu:2018:acl] and [@chen:2018:acl] try to decompose the by word summary generation into selection document and level (or [@gehrmann:2018:emnlp] generates summaries combines a word prediction model with the decoder attention model. The extractive models are usually based on encoders (SummaRuNNer; NeuSum; @cheng:2016:acl). have extended reinforcement learning (Refresh; BanditSum; @dong:2018:emnlp), Maximal Marginal Relevance (NeuSum-MMR; modeling (LatentSum; @zhang:2018:emnlp) and syntactic compression (JECS; @xu:2019:arxiv). is a which simply selects the first three Our model $\text{\sc Hibert | ERT 41.82 19.48 38.30
$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in-domain) 42.10 19.70 38.53
$\tExt{\sc HiberT}_S$ [**42.31**]{} [**19.87**]{} [**38.78**]{}
$\texT{\sc hibErT}_M$ [**42.37**]{} [**19.95**]{} [**38.83**]{}
: ReSultS of various modeLS on tHe CNNDM test set using fulL-lengTh f1 (r-1), <spaN StYle="foNt-variaNT:sMALl-cApS;">ROugE-2</sPAn> (r-2), and <sPan Style="foNt-variant:sMalL-cAps;">Rouge-L</spaN> (r-L).[]{Data-label="tBl:cNndaily"}
Our maIn rEsults On The cnNDM dAtaSet arE shown IN Table \[Tbl:cnndaiLy\], WIth absTRactive MODeLs in The top block and extRAcTIve models in the Bottom BlOCk. pOIntEr+COverage [@see:2017:AcL], AbstRAct-ML+RL [@PAuLUS:2017:ArxIV] and DCA [@celikyIlmaz:2016:naacl] aRE alL sequeNcE to SEquencE learNiNG baSed models wiTh coPy and coveRage moDEling, reINforcemEnt leaRniNg aNd deEP cOmMunIcATinG AgEntS ExtEnsions. SEnTREwritE [@hsu:2018:ACL] ANd [@chEn:2018:aCl] alL try tO decompose the WorD by wORd sUmmarY geneRatiOn Into sEntencE seleCtIon from document And “sEntence” leVel SuMmaRiZatioN (Or compResSioN). [@gehrmaNn:2018:emnlp] GEneRaTES SuMmaries by combines a WoRD PrEdiction Model wITh ThE Decoder aTtEntIon mODEl. The ExtrACtIve modelS are usUAlLy Based on HiErarchIcAl eNcoDers (SUMmaRUNNer; @nAllapati:2017:Aaai aND NeuSum; @cheng:2016:acL). they have been eXTeNDEd WIth rEinForcement leArniNG (RefResh; @nArAyaN:Ea:2018 and bandiTSUM; @dONg:2018:emnlp), Maximal MargiNaL RelevAnce (NEuSum-MMR; @zhou:2018:aCl), latent vaRIABle modelIng (LATeNTSum; @zhang:2018:emnlp) And syNtactic comPRession (JeCS; @xu:2019:Arxiv). LeaD3 is a baselINE which siMplY seLecTs tHE FiRst three senteNCEs. OuR mOdel $\texT{\sc hibert | ERT 4 1.8 2 1 9.48 38.3 0
$\text{\sc Hibert} _S$ ( in - doma i n) 42.1 0 19. 70 38.53
$\text{\s c H ib ert}_S$ [* *42 .31**]{} [ **1 9.87** ]{ } [**38 .78 **]{}
$\t e xt{\sc Hibert}_ M$ [ ** 42.3 7**]{} [**19.95 * *] { } [**38.83** ]{}
: Re s u lts of various m od els o n the CN N DM t e sts et using full -length F1( R-1 ), <sp an st y le="fo nt-va ri a nt: small-caps; ">Ro uge-2</sp an> (R - 2), and <span s tyle=" fon t-v aria n t: sm all -c a ps; " >R oug e -L< /span> ( R- L) .[]{d ata- l a b e l="t bl: cnnd aily" }
Our main r esu ltso n t he CN NDM d atas et areshownin Ta bl e \[tbl:cnndail y\], with abs tra ct ive m odels in the to p b lock an d extra c tiv em o d el s in the bottom bl oc k . P ointer+C overag e [ @s e e:2017:a cl ],Abst r a ct-ML +RL[ @p aulus:20 17:arx i v] a nd DCA[@ celiky il maz :20 16:na a cl]are al l sequen ce to sequence learn i ng based mode l sw i th copy an d coveragemode l ing, rei n fo rce m ent l earni ng an d deep communicating a gentsexten sions. SentRe write [@hs u : 2 018:acl] and [@ c hen:2018:acl]all t ry to deco m pose the word by word summaryg e neration in tosen ten c e s election from d ocum en t and “ sen tence”lev elsum mar iz ation (or compres si on ). [ @ge hrman n :2018:em nl p]ge ner atess ummari es by com bi ne s aword pr e di c t ionmo de l wi thth e dec oder att entionmodel. Th e e x trac ti ve models are usuallyba sed on hie ra rch ical e n c oders (S ummaRuNNer; @nallapati: 2 017:aaa i a nd Ne uSum ; @cheng: 201 6:acl) . T h ey hav e been exte nd edw i th re i n fo rce me nt learnin g (Re fresh ;@Nar ayan:ea :2018 and BanditSu m ; @ dong:2018:emn lp) , Ma x i ma l M a rg i nal R e lev a n ce (NeuSum-MMR; @zhou:201 8: a cl ), latentv ari ab le mode ling (L atent S um; @zh ang:2018: emnlp) an dsynt a c tic compressi on (JECS ; @xu:201 9 :arxi v ). Lead 3 i s a ba se lin e whi ch sim p lyselec ts the f irst t hreese ntences. Our model $\text{\sc H ibert | ERT _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ 41.82 __ ___ 19.48 _ _ _38.30
$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ (in-domain) __ _42.10 _ 19.70 _ ___ 38.53
_$\text{\sc Hibert}_S$ _ _ [**42.31**]{} _ [**19.87**]{} [**38.78**]{}
_$\text{\sc Hibert}_M$ _ _ _ _ _[**42.37**]{} _[**19.95**]{} [**38.83**]{}
:_Results of various_models on the CNNDM test set_using_full-length F1 (R-1),_<span_style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-2</span>_(R-2), and_<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rouge-L</span> (R-L).[]{data-label="tbl:cnndaily"}
Our_main_results on_the_CNNDM dataset are shown in Table_\[tbl:cnndaily\],_with abstractive models in the top block_and extractive models in_the_bottom block. Pointer+Coverage [@see:2017:acl],_Abstract-ML+RL [@paulus:2017:arxiv] and DCA [@celikyilmaz:2016:naacl]_are all sequence to sequence learning_based models_with copy_and coverage modeling, reinforcement learning and deep communicating agents extensions. SentRewrite_[@hsu:2018:acl] and [@chen:2018:acl] all try to_decompose the word by_word summary_generation_into sentence selection_from_document and_“sentence” level summarization (or compression). [@gehrmann:2018:emnlp] generates_summaries by_combines a word prediction model with_the decoder attention model._The_extractive models are usually based on_hierarchical encoders (SummaRuNNer; @nallapati:2017:aaai and NeuSum;_@cheng:2016:acl). They have been extended_with_reinforcement_learning (Refresh; @Narayan:ea:2018 and BanditSum;_@dong:2018:emnlp), Maximal Marginal Relevance (NeuSum-MMR; @zhou:2018:acl),_latent variable modeling_(LatentSum; @zhang:2018:emnlp) and syntactic compression (JECS; @xu:2019:arxiv)._Lead3_is a baseline which simply selects_the_first three sentences. Our model $\text{\sc_Hibert |
ffvalidation\], we found that the $\beta-c_1$ plane produced less accurate atmospheric parameters, relative to fundamental determinations, for late group stars.
For the intermediate group stars (8500 K $\leq T_\mathrm{eff} \leq$ 11000 K), $\log g$ is determined in the $a_0-r^*$ plane. The mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals are -0.060 dex and -0.069 dex, respectively with RMS error 0.091 dex. For the early group stars ($T_\mathrm{eff} >$ 11000 K), $\log g$ is determined in the $c_1-\beta$ plane. The mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals are -0.0215 dex and 0.024 dex, respectively, with RMS error 0.113 dex. The $[u-b]-\beta$ plane was also investigated for early group stars, but was found to produce $\log{g}$ values of lower accuracy relative to the fundamental determinations.
When considered collectively, the mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals for all stars are -0.017 dex and -0.034 dex, and the RMS error 0.127 dex. The uncertainties in our surface gravities that arise from propagating the photometric errors through our atmospheric parameter determination routines are of the order $\sim$ 0.02 dex, significantly lower than the uncertainties demonstrated by the comparison to fundamental values of $\log g$.
As stated above, the main concern with using double-lined eclipsing binaries as surface gravity calibrators for our photometric technique is contamination from the unresolved secondary components. The $\log g$ residuals were examined as a function of both mass ratio and orbital period. While the amplitude of the scatter is marginally larger for low mass ratio or short period systems, in all cases our $\log g$ determinations are within 0.2 dex of the fundamental values $\approx 85\%$ of the time.
To assess any potential systematic inaccuracies of the grids themselves, the surface gravity residuals were examined as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$ and the grid-determined $\log g$. Figures \[fig:logg-cal-fig3\] show the $\log g$ residuals as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$ and $\log g$, respectively. No considerable systematic effects as a function of either effective temperature or $\log g$ were found in the $uvby\beta$ determinations of $\log g | ffvalidation\ ], we found that the $ \beta - c_1 $ plane produced less accurate atmospheric parameters, proportional to cardinal decision, for late group stars.
For the average group stars (8500 K $ \leq T_\mathrm{eff } \leq$ 11000 K), $ \log g$ is determined in the $ a_0 - r^*$ airplane. The beggarly and median of the $ \log g$ residuals are -0.060 dex and -0.069 dex, respectively with RMS mistake 0.091 dex. For the early group stars ($ T_\mathrm{eff } > $ 11000 K), $ \log g$ is determined in the $ c_1-\beta$ airplane. The mean and median of the $ \log g$ residuals are -0.0215 dex and 0.024 dex, respectively, with RMS error 0.113 dex. The $ [ u - b]-\beta$ plane was besides investigated for early group stars, but was find oneself to produce $ \log{g}$ values of broken accuracy relative to the fundamental determinations.
When consider collectively, the mean and median of the $ \log g$ residuals for all stars are -0.017 dex and -0.034 dex, and the RMS mistake 0.127 dex. The uncertainties in our surface gravities that arise from propagating the photometric error through our atmospheric parameter determination routines are of the order $ \sim$ 0.02 dex, significantly lower than the uncertainties demonstrated by the comparison to fundamental values of $ \log g$.
As stated above, the main concern with using double - lined eclipsing binaries as open gravity calibrators for our photometric technique is contaminant from the unsolved junior-grade components. The $ \log g$ residuals were examined as a function of both mass ratio and orbital period. While the amplitude of the scatter is marginally larger for gloomy mass ratio or short period system, in all cases our $ \log g$ determinations are within 0.2 dex of the fundamental values $ \approx 85\%$ of the time.
To assess any likely taxonomic inaccuracy of the grids themselves, the surface gravity residuals were examined as a function of $ T_\mathrm{eff}$ and the grid - determined $ \log g$. Figures \[fig: logg - cal - fig3\ ] picture the $ \log g$ residuals as a function of $ T_\mathrm{eff}$ and $ \log g$, respectively. No considerable systematic effects as a routine of either effective temperature or $ \log g$ were found in the $ uvby\beta$ decision of $ \log g | ffvwlidation\], we found that uhe $\beta-c_1$ plane ptoeuced ness adcurate xtmospheric parameters, relatmve ro fubdamental determinatiovs, for lane group wtarw.
Dor the invsrmediabz grohi staxs (8500 K $\leq T_\mathrk{eff} \leq$ 11000 N), $\log g$ is detaroiued in the $a_0-r^*$ plane. The mean and medyan of yhf $\log g$ residuwls swe -0.060 svx and -0.069 dex, respectively with RJS errog 0.091 dex. For the eatly group stars ($T_\mathrm{eff} >$ 11000 K), $\log g$ is determinfd in the $c_1-\veta$ plane. The mexn and medpcn of the $\lkg g$ residuals are -0.0215 dex and 0.024 deb, res'ectively, wuty RLV error 0.113 dee. The $[l-b]-\beta$ plane was also investogated for earky jroup stars, but was found to produce $\log{g}$ vwlues of nocer accuracy relative ti the fungamevral deuerkihationd.
Whxn considersd collecticely, the mean and mtdiwb of the $\log f$ resiquwls for all stars are -0.017 dex and -0.034 dex, and ths RMS error 0.127 dex. The unxertainties in our sutface gravyties that arise from propagating the photometric errocs thxiugh uyr atmospheric parameter determination routines zrt on the order $\sim$ 0.02 dex, signifocwnyjy lower than the uudedtainties demonstrwted by the xomparisog to fundamental values of $\log t$.
As stated ayovw, the main concern with using dounle-limed eclipsing binaries cs surrace gravitj calibrafurs for our photumenric technique is contaminatiog from thx unrzsolved recomdary somponents. The $\log g$ residuals werf exalited as a fknction of both mass ratio and orbital period. Wvilv the ampjitudc of the scattew is marginalli larger yor lod mass ratpo or shoct period syftems, in all wwses our $\log g$ deteriinarionw are wkghin 0.2 dex of tne fundamvnual values $\approx 85\%$ of the tike.
Tu assess any potzutual systematic onazcuwabiex jx the grids dhemrelxrs, thd surface gvavkty tesiduals were examited zs a function of $T_\kabhrm{eff}$ abd the gwid-determined $\log g$. Figures \[fig:pogg-cel-fig3\] rhow yhe $\log g$ residuals as a function of $T_\mathgm{enf}$ and $\log g$, wespcctidely. No cousiderable systematic effects as a functmon of either effectivg temperature or $\log y$ eere found mn the $uvby\beta$ determinations of $\lig g | ffvalidation\], we found that the $\beta-c_1$ plane accurate parameters, relative fundamental determinations, for intermediate stars (8500 K T_\mathrm{eff} \leq$ 11000 $\log g$ is determined in the plane. The mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals are -0.060 dex -0.069 dex, respectively with RMS error 0.091 dex. For the early group stars >$ K), g$ determined in the $c_1-\beta$ plane. The mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals are -0.0215 and 0.024 dex, respectively, with RMS error 0.113 The $[u-b]-\beta$ plane was investigated for early group stars, was to produce values lower relative to the determinations. When considered collectively, the mean and median of the $\log g$ residuals for all stars are dex and and the error dex. uncertainties in our that arise from propagating the photometric atmospheric parameter determination routines are of the order 0.02 dex, lower than the uncertainties demonstrated by comparison to fundamental values of $\log g$. As above, the main concern with using double-lined eclipsing binaries as surface gravity calibrators for our is contamination from the secondary components. The g$ were as function of mass ratio and orbital period. While the amplitude of the scatter marginally larger for low mass ratio or short period systems, cases $\log g$ determinations within 0.2 dex of fundamental $\approx 85\%$ of the assess potential the themselves, surface gravity residuals were as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$ the grid-determined $\log g$. g$ residuals as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$ and g$, respectively. No considerable systematic effects as function of either effective temperature or $\log g$ were found in the determinations of | ffvalidation\], we found that thE $\beta-c_1$ planE prodUceD leSs AccuRate Atmospheric parAMeteRs, relative to fundamentaL deteRmINatiONs, For laTe group STaRS.
for ThE iNteRmEDiAte grOup Stars (8500 K $\lEq T_\mathrm{eFf} \lEq$ 11000 k), $\log g$ is deterMInEd in the $a_0-r^*$ pLanE. The mean and mEdiAn of thE $\lOg g$ REsiduAls Are -0.060 deX and -0.069 deX, RespecTively witH Rms error 0.091 DEx. For thE EArLy grOup stars ($T_\mathrm{efF} >$ 11000 k), $\lOG g$ is determined In the $c_1-\BeTA$ pLANe. THe mEan and mediAn Of the $\LOg g$ resiDUaLS ARe -0.0215 dEX and 0.024 dex, respecTively, with Rms erRor 0.113 dex. thE $[u-b]-\BEta$ plaNe was AlSO inVestigated fOr eaRly group sTars, buT Was founD To produCe $\log{g}$ ValUes Of loWEr AcCurAcY RelATiVe tO The FundamenTaL dEtermInatIONS.
when ConSideRed coLlectively, the MeaN and MEdiAn of tHe $\log G$ resIdUals fOr all sTars aRe -0.017 Dex and -0.034 dex, and the rMS eRror 0.127 dex. ThE unCeRtaInTies iN Our surFacE grAvities That ariSE frOm PROPaGating the photometrIc ERRoRs througH our atMOsPhERic paramEtEr dEterMINatioN rouTInEs are of tHe ordeR $\SiM$ 0.02 dEx, signiFiCantly LoWer ThaN the uNCertAintieS demonstRated BY the comparison TO fundamental vALuES Of $\LOg g$.
AS stAted above, thE maiN ConcErn wITh UsiNG doubLe-linEd EClIPsing binaries as surfAcE graviTy calIbrators for ouR photometrIC TEchnique Is coNTaMInation from the UnresOlved seconDAry compoNents. the $\log g$ rEsiduals wERE examineD as A fuNctIon OF BoTh mass ratio anD ORbitAl Period. WHilE the ampLitUde Of tHe sCaTter is marGinally lArGeR fOr Low Mass rATio or shoRt PerIoD syStems, IN all caSes ouR $\log G$ dEtERmiNations ARe WIThin 0.2 DeX oF the FunDaMentaL valUEs $\aPprox 85\%$ of The time.
To AssESs anY pOtEntial sYstematic inacCuRacies of thE gRidS themsELVes, the suRface gravity residuals weRE examinEd aS a funCtioN of $T_\mathrM{efF}$ and thE grID-deterMined $\lOg g$. FiGuRes \[FIG:logg-CAL-fIg3\] sHoW the $\log g$ reSIDuaLs as a FuNctiOn of $T_\maThrm{eff}$ and $\log g$, respECtiVely. No consideRabLe sySTEmAtiC EfFEctS aS A fuNCTion of either effEctive tempErATuRe or $\log g$ weRE foUnD in the $uVby\beta$ DeterMInationS of $\log g | ffvalidation\], we found t hat the $\ beta- c_1 $ p la ne p rodu ced less accur a te a tmospheric parameters, rela ti v e to fu ndame ntal de t er m i nat io ns , f or la te gr oup stars.
For theint er mediate grou p s tars (8500 K$\leq T_\mat hrm {eff}\l eq$ 11000 K) , $\l og g$i s dete rmined in t h e $a_0 - r^*$ pl a n e. The mean and mediano ft he $\log g$ re sidual sa re - 0.0 60dex and -0 .0 69 de x , respe c ti v e l y w i th RMS error0.091 dex.F orthe ea rl y g r oup st ars ( $T _ \ma thrm{eff} > $ 11 000 K), $ \log g $ is det e rminedin the $c _1- \bet a $pl ane .T hem ea n a n d m edian of t he $\lo g g$ r e s idua lsare-0.02 15 dex and 0. 024 dex , re spect ively , wi th RMSerror0.113 d ex. The $[u-b]- \bet a$ planewas a lso i nvest i gatedfor ea rly gro up star s , b ut w a sfound to produce $ \l o g {g }$ value s of l o we ra ccuracyre lat ivet o thefund a me ntal det ermina t io ns .
When c onside re d c oll ectiv e ly,the me an and m edian of the $\log g $ residuals fo r a l l s t arsare -0.017 dex and -0.0 34 d e x, an d theRMS e rr o r0 .127 dex. The uncer ta inties in o ur surface gr avities th a t arise fr om p r op a gating the pho tomet ric errors throughour a tmospher ic parame t e r determ ina tio n r out i n es are of the o r d er $ \s im$ 0.0 2 d ex, sig nif ica ntl y l ow er than t he uncer ta in ti es de monst r ated byth e c om par isont o fund ament al v al ue s of $\logg $. As s ta te d ab ove ,the m ainc onc ern wit h using d oub l e-li ne declipsi ng binaries a ssurface gr av ity calib r a tors for our photometric techni q ue is c ont amina tion from the un resolv eds econda ry com ponen ts . T h e $\lo g g$ re si duals were e xam inedas a f unction of both mass rati o an d orbital per iod . Wh i l ethe am p lit ud e of t he scatter is m arginallyla r ge r for lowm ass r atio or shortperio d system s, in all cases ou r$\lo g g$determinat ions are within 0 . 2 dex of thefun dament al va lues$\appr o x 8 5\%$of the t ime.
To as se ss any p otential systematic ina ccurac ies o f t he gridsthe m sel ves, thesurf ace gravit y r esi duals we r e exa mine d a s a funct iono f $T_\mat h rm {ef f } $and the gri d - d ete rmine d $ \ log g$ . Fi gures \[fig:logg- c al-fig3\] show the $ \lo g g $ res id uals as a func tio no f $T_\mat hr m{eff}$ and $\log g $, respe ctivel y. Noconside r a bl e syste mati c e ffects as afu n ction o fei t her ef fect iv e temp eratur e or$ \ log g$ were foun d int h e $uv b y\b eta$de termina t ions of $\logg | ffvalidation\], we_found that_the $\beta-c_1$ plane produced_less accurate_atmospheric_parameters, relative_to_fundamental determinations, for_late group stars.
For_the intermediate group stars_(8500 K $\leq_T_\mathrm{eff}_\leq$ 11000 K), $\log g$ is determined in the $a_0-r^*$ plane. The mean and_median_of the_$\log_g$_residuals are -0.060 dex and_-0.069 dex, respectively with RMS_error 0.091_dex. For the early group stars ($T_\mathrm{eff} >$_11000_K), $\log g$_is determined in the $c_1-\beta$ plane. The mean and_median of the $\log g$ residuals_are -0.0215 dex_and_0.024_dex, respectively, with RMS_error 0.113 dex. The $[u-b]-\beta$ plane_was also investigated for early group_stars, but was found to produce $\log{g}$_values of lower accuracy relative to_the fundamental determinations.
When considered collectively,_the mean_and median of the $\log_g$ residuals for_all stars_are -0.017 dex_and -0.034 dex, and the RMS_error 0.127 dex._The uncertainties in our surface gravities_that_arise from propagating_the_photometric_errors through_our atmospheric parameter_determination_routines are_of_the order $\sim$ 0.02 dex, significantly_lower_than the uncertainties demonstrated by the comparison_to fundamental values of_$\log_g$.
As stated above, the_main concern with using double-lined_eclipsing binaries as surface gravity calibrators_for our_photometric technique_is contamination from the unresolved secondary components. The $\log g$ residuals_were examined as a function of_both mass ratio and_orbital period._While_the amplitude of_the_scatter is_marginally larger for low mass ratio or_short period_systems, in all cases our $\log_g$ determinations are within_0.2_dex of the fundamental values $\approx_85\%$ of the time.
To assess any_potential systematic inaccuracies of the_grids_themselves,_the surface gravity residuals were_examined as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$_and the grid-determined_$\log g$. Figures \[fig:logg-cal-fig3\] show the $\log_g$_residuals as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$_and_$\log g$, respectively. No considerable systematic_effects_as_a function of either effective_temperature or $\log g$ were found_in the $uvby\beta$ determinations of $\log g |
$L_h^{-1}G_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ restricted to ${\overline}{B_{2C_0M_0h}(0)}$ is a contraction, where $X_h$ is normed by $$\|w\|_{X_h}:= \left\|\left(\frac1h {\varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla \frac1h {\varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla_h^2 w\right)\right\|_{H^{1,0}(\Omega)}.$$ Therefore we obtain a unique solution $w$ solving (\[eq:FnEq\]) and satisfying (\[eq:FnEstim\]) with $H^{2,0}(\Omega)$ replaced by $H^{1,0}(\Omega)$. In order to obtain (\[eq:FnEstim\]), one can simply use that $w_j:= \partial_{x_j}w$, $j=1,\ldots, d-1$, solves $$\frac1{h^2}\left( A_n(\nabla_h w)\nabla_h w_j, \nabla_h\varphi \right)_{L^2(\Omega)} =(\partial_{x_j}f,\varphi)_{L^2(\Omega)} \qquad \text{for all}\ \varphi \in H^1_{per}(\Omega)$$ and apply Lemma \[lem:LinEstim2\].
The following lemma contains the essential estimate for the linearized system to (\[eq:Evol1\])-(\[eq:BC3\]):
\[lem:LinEstim3\] Let $0<T<\infty$, $0<h\leq 1$, $0<R\leq R_0$, $n\in {\mathbb N}\cup \{\infty\}$ be given, and let $R_0$ be as in Lemma \[lem:LinEstim2\]. Assume that $u_h$ satisfies (\[eq:LInftyUnifEstim\]) and that $f\in W^1_1(0,T;H^{1,0})^d$, $w_0\in H^{1,2}(\Omega)^d\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega)^d, w_1 \in V(\Omega)^d$. Then there is a unique $w\in C^0([0,T];H^{2,1}(\Omega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega))^d\cap C^2([0,T];H^{1, | $ L_h^{-1}G_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ restricted to $ { \overline}{B_{2C_0M_0h}(0)}$ is a contraction, where $ X_h$ is normed by $ $ \|w\|_{X_h}:= \left\|\left(\frac1h { \varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla \frac1h { \varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla_h^2 w\right)\right\|_{H^{1,0}(\Omega)}.$$ Therefore we obtain a alone solution $ w$ clear (\[eq: FnEq\ ]) and satisfying (\[eq: FnEstim\ ]) with $ H^{2,0}(\Omega)$ replaced by $ H^{1,0}(\Omega)$. In order to prevail (\[eq: FnEstim\ ]), one can simply use that $ w_j:= \partial_{x_j}w$, $ j=1,\ldots, d-1 $, solve $ $ \frac1{h^2}\left (A_n(\nabla_h w)\nabla_h w_j, \nabla_h\varphi \right)_{L^2(\Omega) } =( \partial_{x_j}f,\varphi)_{L^2(\Omega) } \qquad \text{for all}\ \varphi \in H^1_{per}(\Omega)$$ and apply Lemma \[lem: LinEstim2\ ].
The following lemma incorporate the essential estimate for the linearize system to (\[eq: Evol1\])-(\[eq: BC3\ ] ):
\[lem: LinEstim3\ ] Let $ 0 < T<\infty$, $ 0 < h\leq 1 $, $ 0 < R\leq R_0 $, $ n\in { \mathbb N}\cup \{\infty\}$ be given, and let $ R_0 $ be as in Lemma \[lem: LinEstim2\ ]. wear that $ u_h$ satisfies (\[eq: LInftyUnifEstim\ ]) and that $ f\in W^1_1(0,T;H^{1,0})^d$, $ w_0\in H^{1,2}(\Omega)^d\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega)^d, w_1 \in V(\Omega)^d$. Then there is a unique $ w\in C^0([0,T];H^{2,1}(\Omega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega))^d\cap C^2([0,T];H^{1, | $L_h^{-1}H_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ restricttd to ${\overline}{B_{2C_0M_0k}(0)}$ is a rontracfion, whefe $X_h$ is normed by $$\|w\|_{X_h}:= \left\|\lxft(\feac1h {\carepsilon}_h(w),\nabla \frac1f {\varepsipon}_h(w),\naboa_h^2 x\right)\right\|_{H^{1,0}(\Omege)}.$$ Therefore we lbtann a unique solujion $w$ solvitg (\[eq:FnEq\]) and vagidfying (\[eq:FnEstim\]) with $H^{2,0}(\Omega)$ replacqd by $H^{1,0}(\Pmfga)$. In order tj obuaig (\[eq:RnEstim\]), one can simply use that $w_j:= \partian_{x_j}w$, $j=1,\ldots, d-1$, solves $$\frac1{h^2}\left( A_n(\nabla_h w)\nahla_h w_j, \nabla_h\varpji \right)_{L^2(\Omgfa)} =(\[qrtial_{x_j}f,\varohi)_{L^2(\Omega)} \qquad \text{fot all}\ \varphi \in H^1_{per}(\Omega)$$ and apoly Lzmma \[lem:LinEwtum2\].
Tjg following oemma contains thc essendial esyimate for the liiearuzed system to (\[eq:Evol1\])-(\[xq:BC3\]):
\[lem:LinEstim3\] Let $0<J<\infty$, $0<h\lex 1$, $0<R\leq R_0$, $n\in {\mathbv B}\cup \{\hnftf\}$ be tivdn, znv lst $R_0$ bf aa in Lemma \[mem:LinEstim2\]. Assume that $u_h$ satossprs (\[eq:LInftyUhifEstym\]) and that $f\in W^1_1(0,T;H^{1,0})^d$, $w_0\in H^{1,2}(\Omega)^d\cap H^{3,0}(\Omegd)^d, s_1 \in V(\Omega)^d$. Then there is a unique $w\in C^0([0,T];H^{2,1}(\Olega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Jmega))^d\cap C^2([0,T];H^{1, | $L_h^{-1}G_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ restricted to ${\overline}{B_{2C_0M_0h}(0)}$ is where is normed $$\|w\|_{X_h}:= \left\|\left(\frac1h {\varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla obtain unique solution $w$ (\[eq:FnEq\]) and satisfying with $H^{2,0}(\Omega)$ replaced by $H^{1,0}(\Omega)$. In to obtain (\[eq:FnEstim\]), one can simply use that $w_j:= \partial_{x_j}w$, $j=1,\ldots, d-1$, solves A_n(\nabla_h w)\nabla_h w_j, \nabla_h\varphi \right)_{L^2(\Omega)} =(\partial_{x_j}f,\varphi)_{L^2(\Omega)} \qquad \text{for all}\ \varphi \in H^1_{per}(\Omega)$$ and Lemma The lemma the essential estimate for the linearized system to (\[eq:Evol1\])-(\[eq:BC3\]): \[lem:LinEstim3\] Let $0<T<\infty$, $0<h\leq 1$, $0<R\leq R_0$, {\mathbb N}\cup \{\infty\}$ be given, and let $R_0$ as in Lemma \[lem:LinEstim2\]. that $u_h$ satisfies (\[eq:LInftyUnifEstim\]) and $f\in $w_0\in H^{1,2}(\Omega)^d\cap w_1 V(\Omega)^d$. there is a $w\in C^0([0,T];H^{2,1}(\Omega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega))^d\cap C^2([0,T];H^{1, | $L_h^{-1}G_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ restricted To ${\overline}{b_{2C_0M_0h}(0)}$ iS a cOntRaCtioN, wheRe $X_h$ is normed by $$\|W\|_{x_h}:= \leFt\|\left(\frac1h {\varepsilon}_h(W),\nablA \fRAc1h {\vARePsiloN}_h(w),\nablA_H^2 w\RIGht)\RiGhT\|_{H^{1,0}(\OMeGA)}.$$ THerefOre We obtaiN a unique soLutIoN $w$ solving (\[eq:FNeq\]) And satisfyIng (\[Eq:FnEstim\]) witH $H^{2,0}(\OMega)$ rePlAceD By $H^{1,0}(\OmEga)$. in ordEr to obTAin (\[eq:FNEstim\]), one CaN Simply USe that $w_J:= \PArTial_{X_j}w$, $j=1,\ldots, d-1$, solves $$\fRAc1{H^2}\Left( A_n(\nabla_h w)\nAbla_h w_J, \nABlA_H\VarPhi \Right)_{L^2(\OmegA)} =(\pArtiaL_{X_j}f,\varpHI)_{L^2(\oMEGa)} \qQUad \text{for all}\ \Varphi \in H^1_{peR}(\omeGa)$$ and aPpLy LEMma \[lem:linEsTiM2\].
the Following leMma cOntains thE essenTIal estiMAte for tHe lineAriZed SystEM tO (\[eQ:EvOl1\])-(\[EQ:BC3\]):
\[LEm:lineStiM3\] Let $0<T<\infTy$, $0<H\lEq 1$, $0<R\leQ R_0$, $n\iN {\MATHbb N}\Cup \{\InftY\}$ be giVen, and let $R_0$ be aS in lemmA \[Lem:linEsTim2\]. AsSume ThAt $u_h$ sAtisfiEs (\[eq:LinFtyUnifEstim\]) and That $F\in W^1_1(0,T;H^{1,0})^d$, $w_0\iN H^{1,2}(\OMeGa)^d\CaP H^{3,0}(\OmeGA)^d, w_1 \in V(\omeGa)^d$. then theRe is a unIQue $W\iN c^0([0,t];h^{2,1}(\OMega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega))^d\cap C^2([0,t];H^{1, | $L_h^{-1}G_h\colon X_h\to X_h$ rest ricte d t o $ {\ over line }{B_{2C_0M_0h} ( 0)}$ is a contraction, whe re $X _h $ isn or med b y $$\|w \ |_ { X _h} := \ lef t\ | \l eft(\ fra c1h {\v arepsilon} _h( w) ,\nabla \fra c 1h {\varepsi lon }_h(w),\nabl a_h ^2 w\r ig ht) \ right \|_ {H^{1 ,0}(\O m ega)}. $$ Theref or e we ob t ain a u n i qu e so lution $w$ solvin g ( \ [eq:FnEq\]) an d sati sf y in g (\[ eq: FnEstim\]) w ith $ H ^{2,0}( \ Om e g a )$r eplaced by $H ^{1,0}(\Ome g a)$ . In o rd ert o obta in (\ [e q :Fn Estim\]), o ne c an simply use t h at $w_j : = \part ial_{x _j} w$, $j= 1 ,\ ld ots ,d -1$ , s olv e s $ $\frac1{ h^ 2} \left ( A_ n ( \ n abla _hw)\n abla_ h w_j, \nabla _h\ varp h i \ right )_{L^ 2(\O me ga)}=(\par tial_ {x _j}f,\varphi)_{ L^2( \Omega)}\qq ua d \ te xt{fo r all}\ \v arp hi \inH^1_{pe r }(\ Om e g a )$ $ and apply Lemma\[ l e m: LinEstim 2\].
T he f o llowingle mma con t a ins t he e s se ntial es timate fo rthe lin ea rizedsy ste m t o (\[ e q:Ev ol1\]) -(\[eq:B C3\]) :
\[lem:LinEst i m3\] Let $0<T < \i n f ty $ , $0 <h\ leq 1$, $0< R\le q R_0 $, $ n \i n { \ mathb b N}\ cu p \ { \infty\}$ be given, a nd let $R_0 $ be as in Le mma \[lem: L i n Estim2\] . As s um e that $u_h$ sa tisfi es (\[eq:L I nftyUnif Estim \]) andthat $f\i n W^1_1(0, T;H ^{1 ,0} )^d $ , $ w_0\in H^{1,2 } ( \Ome ga )^d\cap H^ {3,0}(\ Ome ga) ^d, w_ 1\in V(\Om ega)^d$. T he nth ere is a unique $ w\ inC^ 0([ 0,T]; H ^{2,1} (\Ome ga)\ ca pH ^{3 ,0}(\Om e ga ) ) ^d\c ap C ^2([ 0,T ]; H^{1, | $L_h^{-1}G_h\colon_X_h\to X_h$_restricted to ${\overline}{B_{2C_0M_0h}(0)}$ is_a contraction,_where_$X_h$ is_normed_by $$\|w\|_{X_h}:= \left\|\left(\frac1h_{\varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla \frac1h {\varepsilon}_h(w),\nabla_h^2_w\right)\right\|_{H^{1,0}(\Omega)}.$$ Therefore we obtain_a unique solution_$w$_solving (\[eq:FnEq\]) and satisfying (\[eq:FnEstim\]) with $H^{2,0}(\Omega)$ replaced by $H^{1,0}(\Omega)$. In order to obtain_(\[eq:FnEstim\]),_one can_simply_use_that $w_j:= \partial_{x_j}w$, $j=1,\ldots, d-1$,_solves $$\frac1{h^2}\left( A_n(\nabla_h w)\nabla_h w_j,_\nabla_h\varphi \right)_{L^2(\Omega)}_=(\partial_{x_j}f,\varphi)_{L^2(\Omega)} \qquad \text{for all}\ \varphi \in H^1_{per}(\Omega)$$ and_apply_Lemma \[lem:LinEstim2\].
The following lemma_contains the essential estimate for the linearized system to_(\[eq:Evol1\])-(\[eq:BC3\]):
\[lem:LinEstim3\] Let $0<T<\infty$, $0<h\leq 1$, $0<R\leq_R_0$, $n\in {\mathbb_N}\cup_\{\infty\}$_be given, and let_$R_0$ be as in Lemma \[lem:LinEstim2\]. Assume_that $u_h$ satisfies (\[eq:LInftyUnifEstim\]) and that_$f\in W^1_1(0,T;H^{1,0})^d$, $w_0\in H^{1,2}(\Omega)^d\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega)^d, w_1 \in_V(\Omega)^d$. Then there is a unique_$w\in C^0([0,T];H^{2,1}(\Omega)\cap H^{3,0}(\Omega))^d\cap C^2([0,T];H^{1, |
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) Contributions Program.
[10]{}
M. Abomhara and G. M. K[ø]{}ien. Cyber security and the internet of things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks., 4(1):65–88, 2015.
.. <https://developer.apple.com/documentation/adsupport/asidentifiermanager>.
M. J. Austin and M. L. Reed. Targeting children online: Internet advertising ethics issues., 16(6):590 – 602, 1999.
.. <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39002142>, February 2017.
K. Bhargavan and G. Leurent.. In [*ACM CCS*]{}, 2016.
.. <https://www.bluetooth.com/~/media/files/specification/bluetooth-low-energy-security.ashx>.
G. Chu, N. Apthorpe, and N. Feamster. Security and privacy analyses of internet of things children’s toys., 2018.
M. Cloherty.. [https: //wtop.com/consumer-news/2017/11/hackableholidays-
how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/](https: //wtop.com/consumer-news/2017/11/hackableholidays-
how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/), November 2017.
.. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>.
.. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>, 2016.
T. Denning, T. Kohno, and H. M. Levy. Computer security and the modern home., 56(1):94–103, 2013.
S. Druga, R. Williams, H. | Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) Contributions Program.
[ 10 ] { }
M. Abomhara and G. M. K[ø]{}ien. Cyber security and the internet of things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruder and attack. , 4(1):65–88, 2015.
.. < https://developer.apple.com/documentation/adsupport/asidentifiermanager >.
M. J. Austin and M. L. Reed. Targeting child on-line: Internet advertising ethics issue. , 16(6):590 – 602, 1999.
.. < http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39002142 >, February 2017.
K. Bhargavan and G. Leurent.. In [ * ACM CCS * ] { }, 2016.
.. < https://www.bluetooth.com/~/media/files/specification/bluetooth-low-energy-security.ashx >.
G. Chu, N. Apthorpe, and N. Feamster. Security and privacy analyses of internet of thing children ’s toys. , 2018.
M. Cloherty.. [ https: //wtop.com / consumer - news/2017/11 / hackableholidays-
how - to - protect - child - using - smart - toys/](https: //wtop.com / consumer - news/2017/11 / hackableholidays-
how - to - protect - kyd - using - smart - toys/), November 2017.
.. < https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en >.
.. < https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en >, 2016.
T. Denning, T. Kohno, and H. M. Levy. Computer security and the modern home. , 56(1):94–103, 2013.
S. Druga, R. Williams, H. | Ofvice of the Privacy Commlssioner of Canabq (OPC) Rontribhtions Pfogram.
[10]{}
M. Abomhara and G. M. K[ø]{}ien. Rybee secyrity and the internet of thingd: vulnerqbilmties, threats, invduders and atfwcks., 4(1):65–88, 2015.
.. <https://developgr.apple.com/dowumentation/adsgpooxt/asidentifiermanager>.
M. J. Austin and M. J. Reed. Yaggeting childrgn onkyne: Jnternet advertising ethics issues., 16(6):590 – 602, 1999.
.. <htup://www.bbc.com/news/workd-europe-39002142>, February 2017.
K. Bhargavwn ajd G. Leurent.. In [*ACM CCS*]{}, 2016.
.. <https://qww.bjyetooth.com/~/meaia/files/sptcnfication/bloetooth-low-energy-security.ashx>.
G. Chu, N. Aptkorpe, and N. Deqmshgr. Security end prpvacy analyses of intarnet og things childven’s voys., 2018.
M. Cloherty.. [https: //wtop.rom/consumer-news/2017/11/hackafleholidafs-
how-to-protect-kidw-uwing-skart-doys/](frtpr: //wuop.rom/donsumfr-nxws/2017/11/hackablegolidays-
hiw-to-protect-kids-usinb-siqrt-toys/), Novemger 2017.
.. <het[s://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-dnd-rundamental-rights/data-pritection/2018-reform-eu-data-ptotection-rtles_en>.
.. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-dnd-fuidxmeubwu-eihhts/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_qh>, 2016.
U. Dekning, T. Kohno, and H. M. Levy. Cokpktrt security and the modedn home., 56(1):94–103, 2013.
S. Druga, R. Wllliams, H. | Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada Program. M. Abomhara G. M. K[ø]{}ien. of vulnerabilities, threats, intruders attacks., 4(1):65–88, 2015. <https://developer.apple.com/documentation/adsupport/asidentifiermanager>. M. J. Austin and M. Reed. Targeting children online: Internet advertising ethics issues., 16(6):590 – 602, 1999. .. February 2017. K. Bhargavan and G. Leurent.. In [*ACM CCS*]{}, 2016. .. <https://www.bluetooth.com/~/media/files/specification/bluetooth-low-energy-security.ashx>. Chu, Apthorpe, N. Security and privacy analyses of internet of things children’s toys., 2018. M. Cloherty.. [https: //wtop.com/consumer-news/2017/11/hackableholidays- how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/](https: how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/), November 2017. .. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>. .. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>, 2016. Denning, T. Kohno, and M. Levy. Computer security and modern 56(1):94–103, 2013. Druga, Williams, | Office of the Privacy CommissIoner of CanAda (OPc) CoNtrIbUtioNs PrOgram.
[10]{}
M. Abomhara ANd G. M. k[ø]{}ien. Cyber security and tHe intErNEt of THiNgs: vuLnerabiLItIES, thReAtS, inTrUDeRs and AttAcks., 4(1):65–88, 2015.
.. <httPs://developeR.apPlE.com/documentATiOn/adsupporT/asIdentifiermaNagEr>.
M. J. AuStIn aND M. L. ReEd. TArgetIng chiLDren onLine: InterNeT AdvertISing ethICS iSsueS., 16(6):590 – 602, 1999.
.. <http://www.bbc.com/newS/WoRLd-europe-39002142>, FebruaRy 2017.
K. BhaRgAVaN ANd G. leuRent.. In [*ACM CcS*]{}, 2016.
.. <Https://WWw.bluetOOtH.COM/~/meDIa/files/specifIcation/blueTOotH-low-enErGy-sECurity.Ashx>.
G. chU, n. ApThorpe, and N. FEamsTer. SecuriTy and pRIvacy anALyses of InternEt oF thIngs CHiLdRen’S tOYs., 2018.
M. cLoHerTY.. [htTps: //wtop.cOm/CoNsumeR-newS/2017/11/HACKablEhoLidaYs-
how-To-protect-kids-UsiNg-smARt-tOys/](htTps: //wtOp.coM/cOnsumEr-news/2017/11/HackaBlEholidays-
how-to-pRoteCt-kids-usiNg-sMaRt-tOyS/), NoveMBer 2017.
.. <httPs://eC.euRopa.eu/cOmmissiON/prIoRITIeS/justice-and-fundameNtAL-RiGhts/data-ProtecTIoN/2018-rEForm-eu-daTa-ProTectION-ruleS_en>.
.. <hTTpS://ec.europA.eu/comMIsSiOn/priorItIes/jusTiCe-aNd-fUndamENtal-Rights/Data-protEctioN/2018-Reform-eu-data-prOTection-rules_eN>, 2016.
t. DENNiNG, T. KoHno, And H. M. Levy. CoMputER secUritY AnD thE ModerN home., 56(1):94–103, 2013.
s. DRUgA, r. Williams, H. | Office of the Privacy Com missionerof Ca nad a ( OP C) C ontr ibutions Progr a m.
[10]{}
M. Abomhara an d G.M. K[ø] { }i en. C yber se c ur i t y a nd t hein t er net o f t hings:vulnerabil iti es , threats, i n tr uders andatt acks., 4(1): 65– 88, 20 15 .
. . <ht tps ://de velope r .apple .com/docu me n tation / adsuppo r t /a side ntifiermanager>.M. J. Austin andM. L.Re e d. T arg eti ng childre nonlin e : Inter n et a d ver t ising ethicsissues., 16 ( 6): 590 –60 2,1 999.
.. <h tt p :// www.bbc.com /new s/world-e urope- 3 9002142 > , Febru ary 20 17.
K . Bh a rg av anan d G. Le ure n t.. In [*AC MCC S*]{} , 20 1 6 .
..<ht tps: //www .bluetooth.co m/~ /med i a/f iles/ speci fica ti on/bl uetoot h-low -e nergy-security. ashx >.
G. Ch u,N. Ap th orpe, and N. Fe ams ter. Se curitya ndpr i v a cy analyses of inter ne t of thingschildr e n’ st oys., 20 18 .
M. C l o herty .. [ h tt ps: //wt op.com / co ns umer-ne ws /2017/ 11 /ha cka bleho l iday s-
h ow-to-pr otect - kids-using-sma r t-toys/](http s :/ / wt o p.co m/c onsumer-new s/20 1 7/11 /hac k ab leh o liday s-
ho w -t o -protect-kids-using -s mart-t oys/) , November 20 17.
.. <h t t p s://ec.e urop a .e u /commission/pr iorit ies/justic e -and-fun damen tal-righ ts/data-p r o tection/ 201 8-r efo rm- e u -d ata-protectio n - rule s_ en>.
. . < https:/ /ec .eu rop a.e u/ commissio n/priori ti es /j us tic e-and - fundamen ta l-r ig hts /data - protec tion/ 2018 -r ef o rm- eu-data - pr o t ecti on -r ules _en >, 2016 .
T . De nning,T. Kohno, an d H.M. L evy. Co mputer securi ty and the m od ern home. , 56(1):94 –103, 2013.
S. Druga,R . Willi ams , H. | Office_of the_Privacy Commissioner of Canada_(OPC) Contributions_Program.
[10]{}
M. Abomhara_and G. M._K[ø]{}ien._Cyber security and_the internet of_things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruders_and attacks., 4(1):65–88,_2015.
.._<https://developer.apple.com/documentation/adsupport/asidentifiermanager>.
M. J. Austin and M. L. Reed. Targeting children online: Internet advertising ethics issues., 16(6):590 –_602,_1999.
.. <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39002142>,_February_2017.
K. Bhargavan_and G. Leurent.. In [*ACM CCS*]{},_2016.
.. <https://www.bluetooth.com/~/media/files/specification/bluetooth-low-energy-security.ashx>.
G. Chu, N. Apthorpe, and N. Feamster._Security and_privacy analyses of internet of things children’s toys.,_2018.
M. Cloherty.._[https: //wtop.com/consumer-news/2017/11/hackableholidays-
_how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/](https: //wtop.com/consumer-news/2017/11/hackableholidays-
how-to-protect-kids-using-smart-toys/), November 2017.
.. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>.
.. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en>, 2016.
T. Denning,_T. Kohno, and H. M. Levy. Computer security_and the modern_home.,_56(1):94–103,_2013.
S. Druga, R. Williams, H. |
\hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \leftrightarrow
\kappa_1, \kappa_2 \leq \alpha \; \mbox{and} \; \hat m \leftrightarrow
\mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]
\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\
\phantom{\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if} \hat{k} \not= \hat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \; \mu_2 > \alpha.
\end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D (\alpha) : \alpha \in
\mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges strongly to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let the projections $F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be defined by $$\label{5.3} \displaystyle{F_\alpha =
\sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $0$, if $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and $F'_\alpha$ to $1$. By a simple calculation using Formula (\[5.2\]) one verifies that for each $f \in {\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{array}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex]
F'_\alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f.
\end{array | \hat{k } = \hat{m } \; \mbox{or } \; \hat k \leftrightarrow
\kappa_1, \kappa_2 \leq \alpha \; \mbox{and } \; \hat m \leftrightarrow
\mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [ 2ex ]
\langle \hat{k } |D (\alpha)| \hat{m } \rangle = \langle \hat{k } |D (2)|
\hat{m } \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or } \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\
\phantom{\langle \hat{k } |D (\alpha)| \hat{m } \rangle = \langle
\hat{k } |D (2)| \hat{m } \rangle, \mbox{if } \hat{k } \not= \hat{m } }
\quad \mbox{or } \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or } \; \mu_2 > \alpha.
\end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\
[ * * suggestion 5.1 :* * ] { } The succession $ (D (\alpha): \alpha \in
\mathbb{N }, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges strongly to $ 0$.\
[ * * validation. * * ] { } Let the projection $ F_\alpha$ and $ F'_\alpha$ be defined by $ $ \label{5.3 } \displaystyle{F_\alpha =
\sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2 }
\langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 }, \;\cdot\; \rangle } $ $ and $ F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $ F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $ 0 $, if $ \alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and $ F'_\alpha$ to $ 1$. By a elementary calculation using Formula (\[5.2\ ]) one verifies that for each $ f \in { \mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $ $ \label{5.4 }
\begin{array}{ll } F_{\alpha } D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [ 3ex ]
F'_\alpha vitamin d (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f.
\end{array | \hah{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \ueftrightarrow
\kcppa_1, \ka'pa_2 \leq \alpha \; \obox{and} \; \hat m \leftrightarrox
\mu_1, \nu_2 \lew \alpha, \\ [2ex]
\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \jat{m} \rantle = \oangle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangls, \; \ka'pe_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \al[ha \; \\
\phantom{\latgue \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hae{k} |D (2)| \hst{l} \rangle, \mbox{is} \hau{k} \got= \gat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \; \mu_2 > \alkha.
\end{array}$$ These lroperties have the followlng fonsequence.\
[**Proposihion 5.1:**]{} The sgsuegxe $(D (\alpha) : \xlpha \in
\mauhyb{N}, \alpha \ggq 2) $ converges strongly to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let che projectuobs $V_\dlpha$ and $F'_\elpha$ fe defined bn $$\label{5.3} \displaustyle{F_\alpha =
\smm^\infvy_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\nappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Ksi^-_{\kappa_1, \kdp'a_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\qlpha = 1 - F_\anpha$. Rhev $F_\zl'ha$ conveggea strongly to $0$, if $\alpya \rightarrow \infty$, age $F'_\alpha$ to $1$. Gy a sym[le calculation using Formula (\[5.2\]) one verixiea that for each $f \in {\marhcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{arrai}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex]
F'_\alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\eloha f.
\cnd{afeaj | \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat \kappa_1, \leq \alpha \mbox{and} \; \hat \alpha, [2ex] \langle \hat{k} (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle \langle \hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\ \phantom{\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if} \hat{k} \not= \hat{m}} \quad \;\mu_1 \alpha \mbox{or} \mu_2 > \alpha. \end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\ [**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D (\alpha) \alpha \in \mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges to $0$.\ [**Proof.**]{} Let projections $F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be by \displaystyle{F_\alpha = \kappa_2 \alpha \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2} \langle \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $0$, if \rightarrow \infty$, to $1$. a calculation Formula (\[5.2\]) one for each $f \in {\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4} (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex] D (\alpha)f F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f. \end{array | \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \leftrigHtarrow
\kapPa_1, \kapPa_2 \lEq \aLpHa \; \mbOx{anD} \; \hat m \leftrightARrow
\Mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]
\langle \haT{k} |D (\alPhA)| \Hat{m} \RAnGle = \laNgle \hat{K} |d (2)|
\hAT{M} \raNgLe, \; \KapPa_1 > \ALpHa\; \mboX{or} \;\Kappa_2 > \alPha \; \\
\phantom{\LanGlE \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hAT{m} \Rangle = \langLe
\hAt{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangLe, \mBox{if} \hAt{K} \noT= \Hat{m}}
\qUad \Mbox{oR} \;\mu_1 > \alpHA \; \mbox{oR} \; \mu_2 > \alpha.
\eNd{ARray}$$ ThESe propeRTIeS havE the following consEQuENce.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} the seqUeNCe $(d (\ALphA) : \alPha \in
\mathbB{N}, \Alpha \GEq 2) $ conveRGeS STRonGLy to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let tHe projectioNS $F_\aLpha$ anD $F'_\AlpHA$ be defIned bY $$\lABel{5.3} \DisplaystylE{F_\alPha =
\sum^\infTy_{\kappA_1, \Kappa_2 > \alPHa } \Psi^-_{\kaPpa_1 \kapPa_2}
\lAngLe \PsI^-_{\KaPpA_1, \kaPpA_2}, \;\CdoT\; \RaNglE }$$ And $f'_\alpha = 1 - F_\aLpHa$. then $F_\AlphA$ CONVergEs sTronGly to $0$, If $\alpha \rightaRroW \infTY$, anD $F'_\alpHa$ to $1$. BY a siMpLe calCulatiOn usiNg formula (\[5.2\]) one verifIes tHat for eacH $f \iN {\mAthCaL{H}}^2_-$: $$\labEL{5.4}
\begin{ArrAy}{lL} F_{\alpha} d (\alpha)f = f_\AlpHa d (2) F, \\ [3EX]
F'_\Alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha d (2) F_\ALPhA f.
\end{arrAy | \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbo x{or} \; \ hat k \l eft ri ghta rrow
\kappa_1, \ka p pa_2 \leq \alpha \; \mbox{ and}\; \hat m\left rightar r ow \ mu_ 1, \ mu_ 2\ le q \al pha , \\ [2 ex]
\lang le\h at{k} |D (\a l ph a)| \hat{m } \ rangle = \la ngl e \hat {k } | D (2)|
\h at{m} \rang l e, \;\kappa_1>\ alpha\ ; \mbox{ o r }\;\k appa_2 > \alpha \ ; \ \
\phantom{\lan gle \h at { k} | D ( \al pha)| \hat {m } \ra n gle = \ l an g l e
\h a t{k} |D (2)|\hat{m} \ra n gle , \mbo x{ if} \hat{k } \no t= \ha t{m}}
\quad \mb ox{or} \; \mu_1> \alpha \; \mbo x{or}\;\mu _2 > \a lp ha.
\ e nd{ a rr ay} $ $ T hese pro pe rt ies h avet h e foll owi ng c onseq uence.\
[**Pr opo siti o n 5 .1:** ]{} T he s eq uence $(D ( \alph a) : \alpha \in
\ math bb{N}, \a lph a\ge q2) $c onverg esstr ongly t o $0$.\ [** Pr o o f .* *]{} Let the proje ct i o ns $F_\alp ha$ an d $ F' _ \alpha$be de fine d by $$ \lab e l{ 5.3} \di splays t yl e{ F_\alph a=
\sum ^\ inf ty_ {\kap p a_1, \kapp a_2 > \a lpha} \Psi^-_{\kapp a _1 \kappa_2}\ la n g le \Psi ^-_ {\kappa_1,\kap p a_2} , \; \ cd ot\ ; \ran gle } $$ an d $F'_\alpha = 1 - F _\ alpha$ . The n $F_\alpha$convergess t r ongly to $0$ , i f $\alpha \righ tarro w \infty$, and $F'_ \alph a$ to $1 $. By a s i m ple calc ula tio n u sin g Fo rmula (\[5.2\ ] ) one v erifies th at foreac h $ f \ in{\ mathcal{H }}^2_-$: $ $\ la be l{5 .4}
\ b egin{arr ay }{l l} F_ {\alp h a} D ( \alph a)f=F_ \ alp ha D (2 ) f , \\ [ 3e x]
F'_ \al ph a D ( \alp h a)f = F'_\ alpha D ( 2)F _\al ph af.
\end {array | \hat{k}_= \hat{m}_\; \mbox{or} \; \hat_k \leftrightarrow
\kappa_1,_\kappa_2_\leq \alpha_\;_\mbox{and} \; \hat_m \leftrightarrow
\mu_1, \mu_2_\leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]
\langle_\hat{k} |D (\alpha)|_\hat{m}_\rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 >_\alpha_\; \\
\phantom{\langle_\hat{k}_|D_(\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hat{k}_|D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if}_\hat{k} \not=_\hat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \;_\mu_2_> \alpha.
\end{array}$$ These_properties have the following consequence.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D_(\alpha) : \alpha \in
\mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq_2) $ converges_strongly_to_$0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let the projections_$F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be defined by_$$\label{5.3} \displaystyle{F_\alpha =
\sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha_} \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle_}$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 -_F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly_to $0$,_if $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and_$F'_\alpha$ to $1$._By a_simple calculation using_Formula (\[5.2\]) one verifies that for_each $f \in_{\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{array}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f =_F_\alpha_D (2) f,_\\_[3ex]
F'_\alpha_D (\alpha)f_= F'_\alpha D_(2)_F_\alpha f.
\end{array |
05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 & 0.4356297\
0.06 & 4.944366 & 4.957093 & 0.4299292 & 0.4369816\
0.07 & 4.326666 & 4.339270 & 0.4312912 & 0.4383197\
0.08 & 3.861024 & 3.873509 & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\
0.09 & 3.497062 & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\
0.1 & 3.204486 & 3.216745 & 0.4352992 & 0.4422610\
0.15 & 2.316048 & 2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\
0.2 & 1.862378 & 1.873704 & 0.4479148 & 0.4546988\
0.3 & 1.397190 & 1.407807 & 0.4595754 & 0.4662293\
0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 & 0.4770099\
0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 & 0.4806690 & 0.4871491\
0.6 & 0.9096393 & 0.9188476 & 0.4903037 & 0.4967247\
0.7 & 0.8367240 & 0.8456023 & 0.4994196 & 0.5057952\
0.8 & 0.7812334 & 0.7898263 & 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\
0.9 & 0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 & 0.5225857\
1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284 & 0.5240721 & 0.5303672\
\
0.0001 & 2501.783 & 2501.798 & 0.4214673 & 0.4286859\
0.0003 & 834.9432 & 834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\
0 | 05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 & 0.4356297\
0.06 & 4.944366 & 4.957093 & 0.4299292 & 0.4369816\
0.07 & 4.326666 & 4.339270 & 0.4312912 & 0.4383197\
0.08 & 3.861024 & 3.873509 & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\
0.09 & 3.497062 & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\
0.1 & 3.204486 & 3.216745 & 0.4352992 & 0.4422610\
0.15 & 2.316048 & 2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\
0.2 & 1.862378 & 1.873704 & 0.4479148 & 0.4546988\
0.3 & 1.397190 & 1.407807 & 0.4595754 & 0.4662293\
0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 & 0.4770099\
0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 & 0.4806690 & 0.4871491\
0.6 & 0.9096393 & 0.9188476 & 0.4903037 & 0.4967247\
0.7 & 0.8367240 & 0.8456023 & 0.4994196 & 0.5057952\
0.8 & 0.7812334 & 0.7898263 & 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\
0.9 & 0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 & 0.5225857\
1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284 & 0.5240721 & 0.5303672\
\
0.0001 & 2501.783 & 2501.798 & 0.4214673 & 0.4286859\
0.0003 & 834.9432 & 834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\
0 | 05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 & 0.4356297\
0.06 & 4.944366 & 4.957093 & 0.4299292 & 0.4369816\
0.07 & 4.326666 & 4.339270 & 0.4312912 & 0.4383197\
0.08 & 3.861024 & 3.873509 & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\
0.09 & 3.497062 & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\
0.1 & 3.204486 & 3.216745 & 0.4352992 & 0.4422610\
0.15 & 2.316048 & 2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\
0.2 & 1.862378 & 1.873704 & 0.4479148 & 0.4546988\
0.3 & 1.397190 & 1.407807 & 0.4595754 & 0.4662293\
0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 & 0.4770099\
0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 & 0.4806690 & 0.4871491\
0.6 & 0.9096393 & 0.9188476 & 0.4903037 & 0.4967247\
0.7 & 0.8367240 & 0.8456023 & 0.4994196 & 0.5057952\
0.8 & 0.7812334 & 0.7898263 & 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\
0.9 & 0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 & 0.5225857\
1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284 & 0.5240721 & 0.5303672\
\
0.0001 & 2501.783 & 2501.798 & 0.4214673 & 0.4286859\
0.0003 & 834.9432 & 834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\
0 | 05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 0.06 4.944366 & & 0.4299292 & 4.339270 0.4312912 & 0.4383197\ & 3.861024 & & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\ 0.09 & & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\ 0.1 & 3.204486 & 3.216745 & 0.4352992 0.4422610\ 0.15 & 2.316048 & 2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\ 0.2 & 1.862378 1.873704 0.4479148 0.4546988\ & 1.397190 & 1.407807 & 0.4595754 & 0.4662293\ 0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 & 0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 & 0.4806690 & 0.6 & 0.9096393 & & 0.4903037 & 0.4967247\ 0.7 0.8367240 0.8456023 & & 0.8 0.7812334 & 0.7898263 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\ 0.9 & 0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 & 0.5225857\ 1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284 0.5240721 & 0.0001 & & & & 0.4286859\ 0.0003 & 834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\ | 05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 & 0.4356297\
0.06 & 4.944366 & 4.957093 & 0.4299292 & 0.4369816\
0.07 & 4.326666 & 4.339270 & 0.4312912 & 0.4383197\
0.08 & 3.861024 & 3.873509 & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\
0.09 & 3.497062 & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\
0.1 & 3.204486 & 3.216745 & 0.4352992 & 0.4422610\
0.15 & 2.316048 & 2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\
0.2 & 1.862378 & 1.873704 & 0.4479148 & 0.4546988\
0.3 & 1.397190 & 1.407807 & 0.4595754 & 0.4662293\
0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 & 0.4770099\
0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 & 0.4806690 & 0.4871491\
0.6 & 0.9096393 & 0.9188476 & 0.4903037 & 0.4967247\
0.7 & 0.8367240 & 0.8456023 & 0.4994196 & 0.5057952\
0.8 & 0.7812334 & 0.7898263 & 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\
0.9 & 0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 & 0.5225857\
1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284 & 0.5240721 & 0.5303672\
\
0.0001 & 2501.783 & 2501.798 & 0.4214673 & 0.4286859\
0.0003 & 834.9432 & 834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\
0 | 05 & 5.804628 & 5.817483 & 0.4285523 & 0. 435 629 7\
0.0 6 &4.944366 & 4.9 5 7093 & 0.4299292 & 0.43698 16\
0 .0 7 & 4 . 32 6666& 4.339 2 70 & 0. 43 12 912 & 0. 43831 97\
0.08 & 3.861024& 3 .8 73509 & 0.43 2 63 99 & 0.439 645 4\
0.09 & 3. 497 062 &3. 509 4 30 &0.4 33975 6 & 0. 4 409590 \
0.1 & 3 .2 0 4486 & 3.21674 5 &0.43 52992 & 0.4422610 \
0 . 15 & 2.316048& 2.32 78 0 5& 0.4 417 402 & 0.44 86 057\0 .2 & 1. 8 62 3 7 8 &1 .873704 & 0.4 479148 & 0. 4 546 988\
0 .3 &1 .39719 0 & 1 .4 0 780 7 & 0.45957 54 & 0.466229 3\
0.4 & 1.157 4 29 & 1. 167483 &0.4 7045 4 3&0.4 77 0 099 \
0 .5& 1. 009977 & 1 .0 19571 & 0 . 4 8 0 6690 &0.48 71491 \
0.6 & 0.909 639 3 &0 .91 88476 & 0. 4903 03 7 & 0 .49672 47\
0 .7 & 0.8367240 &0.84 56023 & 0 .49 94 196 & 0.50 5 7952\0.8 &0.78123 34 & 0. 7 898 26 3 & 0 .5080637 & 0.51440 42 \ 0. 9 & 0.73 75358& 0 .7 4 58785 &0. 516 2717 & 0.52 2585 7 \1. & 0.7 022076 &0. 7103284 & 0.524 07 21& 0 .5303 6 72\\
0.0 001 & 25 01.78 3 & 2501.798 &0 .4214673 & 0. 4 28 6 8 59 \
0.0 003 & 834.9432 & 8 3 4.95 68 & 0. 421 4 956 & 0.42 87 1 36 \
0 | 05 &_5.804628 &_5.817483 & 0.4285523 &_0.4356297\
0.06 &_4.944366_& 4.957093_&_0.4299292 & 0.4369816\
0.07_& 4.326666 &_4.339270 & 0.4312912 &_0.4383197\
0.08 & 3.861024_&_3.873509 & 0.4326399 & 0.4396454\
0.09 & 3.497062 & 3.509430 & 0.4339756 & 0.4409590\
0.1 &_3.204486_& 3.216745_&_0.4352992_& 0.4422610\
0.15 & 2.316048 &_2.327805 & 0.4417402 & 0.4486057\
0.2_& 1.862378_& 1.873704 & 0.4479148 & 0.4546988\
0.3 & 1.397190_&_1.407807 & 0.4595754_& 0.4662293\
0.4 & 1.157429 & 1.167483 & 0.4704543 &_0.4770099\
0.5 & 1.009977 & 1.019571 &_0.4806690 & 0.4871491\
0.6_&_0.9096393_& 0.9188476 & 0.4903037_& 0.4967247\
0.7 & 0.8367240 & 0.8456023_& 0.4994196 & 0.5057952\
0.8 & 0.7812334_& 0.7898263 & 0.5080637 & 0.5144042\
0.9 &_0.7375358 & 0.7458785 & 0.5162717 &_0.5225857\
1. & 0.7022076 & 0.7103284_& 0.5240721_& 0.5303672\
\
0.0001 & 2501.783 &_2501.798 & 0.4214673_& 0.4286859\
0.0003_& 834.9432 &_834.9568 & 0.4214956 & 0.4287136\
0 |
function $$f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}+{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1}
-{1\over kT}\right\}=
{1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f
\,d\gamma'-\int_1^\infty (A+E)f\,d\gamma'\times\int_1^\gamma
\tilde S\,d\gamma'\right\}, \label{2.3}$$ while $[Df]'-Pf=0$ at $\gamma=1$ was assumed (cf. eq. (\[2.2\])). The last term in eq. (\[2.3\]) follows simply from conservation of the total number of positrons $$\int_1^\infty[A(\gamma)+E(\gamma)]f(\gamma)\,d\gamma=\int_1^\infty
S(\gamma)\,d\gamma, \label{2.4}$$ which is always fulfilled if the source function has the form $S(\gamma)=\tilde S(\gamma)\times$ $\int_1^\infty
(A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ and $\int_1^\infty\tilde S\,d\gamma=1$. A regular singular point $\gamma=1$ in eq. (\[2.3\]) does not lead to any singularity of the solution, which is Maxwellian-like at the low-energy part. Equation (\[2.4\]) gives also an idea of physical meaning of term $[E(\gamma)f(\gamma)]$, that is the number of positrons with Lorentz factor $\gamma$ escaping from the plasma volume per 1 sec. The approach can be easily generalized to include inelastic processes, stochastic acceleration etc.
Equation (\[2.8\]) or (\[2.3\]) can be resolved numerically with an algorithm which reduces it to a first-order differential equation. Let $f_i(\gamma)$ is the solution obtained after the $i$-th iteration, then the equation $$f'_{i+1}(\gamma)-f_{i+1}(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}
+{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1}-{1\over kT}\right\}=
{1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f_i
\,d\gamma'-\int_1 | function $ $ f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}+{\gamma\over\gamma^2 - 1 }
-{1\over kT}\right\}=
{ 1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f
\,d\gamma'-\int_1^\infty (A+E)f\,d\gamma'\times\int_1^\gamma
\tilde S\,d\gamma'\right\ }, \label{2.3}$$ while $ [ Df]'-Pf=0 $ at $ \gamma=1 $ was assumed (cf. eq. (\[2.2\ ]) ). The last condition in eq. (\[2.3\ ]) take after simply from conservation of the total number of positron $ $ \int_1^\infty[A(\gamma)+E(\gamma)]f(\gamma)\,d\gamma=\int_1^\infty
S(\gamma)\,d\gamma, \label{2.4}$$ which is always fulfilled if the source affair has the form $ S(\gamma)=\tilde S(\gamma)\times$ $ \int_1^\infty
(A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ and $ \int_1^\infty\tilde S\,d\gamma=1$. A even singular point $ \gamma=1 $ in eq. (\[2.3\ ]) does not lead to any singularity of the solution, which is Maxwellian - like at the broken - energy part. equality (\[2.4\ ]) gives also an idea of physical meaning of term $ [ E(\gamma)f(\gamma)]$, that is the number of positrons with Lorentz component $ \gamma$ escaping from the plasma volume per 1 sec. The approach can be well generalized to include inelastic process, stochastic acceleration etc.
Equation (\[2.8\ ]) or (\[2.3\ ]) can be resolved numerically with an algorithm which boil down it to a first - order differential equation. Let $ f_i(\gamma)$ is the solution obtained after the $ i$-th iteration, then the equality $ $ f'_{i+1}(\gamma)-f_{i+1}(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma }
+ { \gamma\over\gamma^2 - 1}-{1\over kT}\right\}=
{ 1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f_i
\,d\gamma'-\int_1 | fujction $$f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\oyer\gamma}+{\gamma\ovet\gqmma^2-1}
-{1\ovxr kT}\rifht\}=
{1\ovef D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f
\,d\gamla'-\unt_1^\indty (A+E)f\,d\gamma'\times\int_1^\gxmma
\tilde S\,d\gamma'\eighu\}, \layeo{2.3}$$ while $[Df]'-Pf=0$ aj $\gamma=1$ was dssumed (cf. eq. (\[2.2\])). Tve lcst term in eq. (\[2.3\]) follows simply from cjnservayiln of the totaj nukfer kf positrons $$\int_1^\infty[A(\gamma)+E(\gamma)]f(\famma)\,d\gemma=\int_1^\infty
S(\gakma)\,d\gamma, \label{2.4}$$ whixh if always fulfklled if the source fuhction has the form $S(\gamma)=\tilde S(\gamka)\times$ $\inj_1^\nbftj
(D+E)f\,d\gamma'$ aid $\int_1^\pnfty\tilde S\,d\nsmma=1$. A regulat singular poikt $\gakma=1$ in eq. (\[2.3\]) does not lead vo any singularity os the solgtnon, which is Maxwelliqn-oike dt tve luq-endrgg 'arf. Equahioi (\[2.4\]) gives alao an idea if physical meaning os term $[E(\gamma)f(\famma)]$, ehwt is the number of positrons with Lorettz factor $\gamma$ escaping drom the plasma volumg per 1 sec. The approach can be easily generalized to includa inemxstng oeofesses, stochastic acceleration etc.
Equation (\[2.8\]) ow (\[2.3\]) vak be resolved nuierically wotj sg algorithm wfich rzsudes it to a first-ogder disferebtial equwtiom. Let $f_i(\gamma)$ is the solutiin obtained cftwr the $i$-th iteratiln, then the equstion $$f'_{i+1}(\gamma)-f_{i+1}(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\yamma}
+{\gzmma\over\gamla^2-1}-{1\over kT}\dkght\}=
{1\over D(\gamma)}\ldft\{\pnt_1^\gdmma (A+E)f_i
\,d\gamma'-\int_1 | function $$f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}+{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1} -{1\over kT}\right\}= {1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f \tilde \label{2.3}$$ while at $\gamma=1$ was last in eq. (\[2.3\]) simply from conservation the total number of positrons $$\int_1^\infty[A(\gamma)+E(\gamma)]f(\gamma)\,d\gamma=\int_1^\infty \label{2.4}$$ which is always fulfilled if the source function has the form $S(\gamma)=\tilde $\int_1^\infty (A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ and $\int_1^\infty\tilde S\,d\gamma=1$. A regular singular point $\gamma=1$ in eq. (\[2.3\]) not to singularity the solution, which is Maxwellian-like at the low-energy part. Equation (\[2.4\]) gives also an idea of meaning of term $[E(\gamma)f(\gamma)]$, that is the number positrons with Lorentz factor escaping from the plasma volume 1 The approach be generalized include inelastic processes, acceleration etc. Equation (\[2.8\]) or (\[2.3\]) can be resolved numerically with an algorithm which reduces it to first-order differential $f_i(\gamma)$ is solution after $i$-th iteration, then $$f'_{i+1}(\gamma)-f_{i+1}(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma} +{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1}-{1\over kT}\right\}= {1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f_i | function $$f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\oVer\gamma}+{\gaMma\ovEr\gAmmA^2-1}
-{1\oVer kt}\rigHt\}=
{1\over D(\gamma)}\leFT\{\int_1^\Gamma (A+E)f
\,d\gamma'-\int_1^\infty (a+E)f\,d\gAmMA'\timES\iNt_1^\gamMa
\tilde s\,D\gAMMa'\rIgHt\}, \LabEl{2.3}$$ WHiLe $[Df]'-PF=0$ at $\Gamma=1$ waS assumed (cf. Eq. (\[2.2\])). THe Last term in eq. (\[2.3\]) FOlLows simply FroM conservatioN of The totAl NumBEr of pOsiTrons $$\Int_1^\infTY[A(\gammA)+E(\gamma)]f(\gAmMA)\,d\gammA=\Int_1^\inftY
s(\GaMma)\,d\Gamma, \label{2.4}$$ which is ALwAYs fulfilled if tHe sourCe FUnCTIon Has The form $S(\gaMmA)=\tildE s(\gamma)\tIMeS$ $\INT_1^\inFTy
(A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ anD $\int_1^\infty\tiLDe S\,D\gamma=1$. a rEguLAr singUlar pOiNT $\gaMma=1$ in eq. (\[2.3\]) does Not lEad to any sIngulaRIty of thE SolutioN, which Is MAxwElliAN-lIkE at ThE Low-ENeRgy PArt. equation (\[2.4\]) GiVeS also An idEA OF PhysIcaL meaNing oF term $[E(\gamma)f(\gAmmA)]$, thaT Is tHe numBer of PosiTrOns wiTh LoreNtz faCtOr $\gamma$ escaping From The plasma VolUmE peR 1 sEc. The APproacH caN be Easily gEneraliZEd tO iNCLUdE inelastic processeS, sTOChAstic accEleratIOn EtC.
equation (\[2.8\]) Or (\[2.3\]) Can Be reSOLved nUmerICaLly with aN algorIThM wHich redUcEs it to A fIrsT-orDer diFFereNtial eQuation. LEt $f_i(\gAMma)$ is the solutiON obtained afteR ThE $I$-Th ITeraTioN, then the equAtioN $$F'_{i+1}(\gaMma)-f_{I+1}(\GaMma)\LEft\{{1\ovEr\gamMa}
+{\GAmMA\over\gamma^2-1}-{1\over kT}\rigHt\}=
{1\Over D(\gAmma)}\lEft\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)F_i
\,d\gamma'-\inT_1 | function $$f'(\gamma)-f(\ gamma)\lef t\{{1 \ov er\ ga mma} +{\g amma\over\gamm a ^2-1 }
-{1\over kT}\right\} =
{ 1\ o verD (\ gamma )}\left \ {\ i n t_1 ^\ ga mma ( A +E )f
\, d\g amma'-\ int_1^\inf ty(A +E)f\,d\gamm a '\ times\int_ 1^\ gamma
\tilde S\ ,d\gam ma '\r i ght\} , \labe l {2.3}$$ w hi le $ [Df]'-Pf=0$ at $\ g am m a=1$ was assum ed (cf .e q. ( \[2 .2\ ])). The l as t ter m in eq. (\ [ 2 . 3\] ) follows simp ly from con s erv ationof th e total numb er ofpositrons $ $\in t_1^\inft y[A(\g a mma)+E( \ gamma)] f(\gam ma) \,d \gam m a= \i nt_ 1^ \ inf t yS(\ g amm a)\,d\ga mm a, \ lab el{2 . 4}$ $ whi ch is alw ay s ful filled if t he source functio n ha s the for m $ S( \ga mm a)=\t i lde S( \ga mma )\times $ $\int _ 1^\ in f t y
( A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ a nd $ \i nt_1^\in fty\ti l de S \ ,d\gamma =1 $.A re g u lar s ingu l ar point $ \gamma = 1$ i n eq. ( \[ 2.3\]) d oes no t lea d toany si ngularit y oft he solution, w h ich is Maxwel l ia n - li k e at th e low-energ y pa r t. E quat i on (\ [ 2.4\] ) giv es al s o an idea of physic al meani ng of term $[E(\ga mma)f(\gam m a ) ]$, that ist he number of posi trons with Lore n tz facto r $\g amma$ es caping fr o m the pla sma vo lum e p e r 1 sec. The app r o achca n be ea sil y gener ali zed to in cl ude inela stic pro ce ss es ,sto chast i c accele ra tio netc .
Eq u ation(\[2. 8\]) o r( \[2 .3\]) c a nb e res ol ve d nu mer ic allywith analgorit hm whichred u cesit t o a fir st-order diff er ential equ at ion . Let$ f _i(\gamm a)$ is the solution obt a ined af ter the$i$- th iterat ion , then th e equat ion $$ f'_{i +1 }(\ g a mma)- f _ {i +1} (\ gamma)\lef t \ {{1 \over \g amma }
+{\ga mma\over\gamma^2-1 } -{1 \over kT}\rig ht\ }=
{ 1 \ ov erD (\ g amm a) } \le f t \{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f_i\, d \g amma'-\int _ 1 | function_$$f'(\gamma)-f(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}+{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1}
-{1\over kT}\right\}=_
{1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f
\,d\gamma'-\int_1^\infty_(A+E)f\,d\gamma'\times\int_1^\gamma
\tilde S\,d\gamma'\right\},__ __ _ _ _ __ _\label{2.3}$$_while $[Df]'-Pf=0$_at_$\gamma=1$_was assumed (cf. eq. (\[2.2\])). The last_term in eq. (\[2.3\]) follows simply_from conservation_of the total number of positrons $$\int_1^\infty[A(\gamma)+E(\gamma)]f(\gamma)\,d\gamma=\int_1^\infty
S(\gamma)\,d\gamma, __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ \label{2.4}$$_which is always fulfilled if the source_function has the form $S(\gamma)=\tilde S(\gamma)\times$_$\int_1^\infty
(A+E)f\,d\gamma'$ and $\int_1^\infty\tilde S\,d\gamma=1$. A_regular singular_point $\gamma=1$ in eq. (\[2.3\]) does_not lead to_any singularity_of the solution,_which is Maxwellian-like at the low-energy_part. Equation (\[2.4\])_gives also an idea of physical_meaning_of term $[E(\gamma)f(\gamma)]$,_that_is_the number_of positrons with_Lorentz_factor $\gamma$_escaping_from the plasma volume per 1_sec._The approach can be easily generalized to_include inelastic processes, stochastic_acceleration_etc.
Equation (\[2.8\]) or (\[2.3\])_can be resolved numerically with_an algorithm which reduces it to_a first-order_differential equation._Let $f_i(\gamma)$ is the solution obtained after the $i$-th iteration, then_the equation $$f'_{i+1}(\gamma)-f_{i+1}(\gamma)\left\{{1\over\gamma}
+{\gamma\over\gamma^2-1}-{1\over kT}\right\}=
{1\over D(\gamma)}\left\{\int_1^\gamma (A+E)f_i
\,d\gamma'-\int_1 |
. Each training set is further divided into a 80-20 training/validation stratified split based on binned pupil center locations of each image.
To derive conclusions about varying eye camera poses and domain generalizability, each of the previously mentioned neural network architectures (RITnet and SegNet), are trained under three different configurations: a) training with S-NVGaze, b) training with S-OpenEDS, and c) training with a combination of randomly selected S-NVGaze and S-OpenEDS images (50$\%$ each). A subset of images was set aside for model testing, including the entirety of the S-General dataset, 1500 random images extracted from each head model of the NVGaze dataset (60k images), and 2392 images present in the official OpenEDS validation set.
#### **Training:**
We trained our models using the Adam optimizer [@Kingma2014Adam:Optimization] with a learning rate of 5e$^{-4}$ for 40 epochs. We reduced the learning rate by a factor of 10 when the validation loss plateaued for more than 5 epochs. Both models are trained using the loss function strategy proposed in RITnet [@Chaudhary2019RITnet:Tracking]. This strategy involves using a weighted combination of four loss functions:
- cross-entropy loss $\mathcal{L}_{CEL}$
- generalized dice loss [@Sudre2017GeneralisedSegmentations] $\mathcal{L}_{GDL}$
- boundary aware loss $\mathcal{L}_{BAL}$
- surface loss [@Kervadec2018BoundarySegmentation] $\mathcal{L}_{SL}$
The total loss $\mathcal{L}$ is given by a weighted combination of these losses as $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{CEL} (\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 \mathcal{L}_{BAL} ) + \lambda_3 \mathcal{L}_{GDL} + \lambda_4 \mathcal{L}_{SL}$. In our experiments, we used $\lambda_1 = 1$, $\lambda_2 = 20$, $\lambda_3 = $ (1 – $\alpha$) and $\lambda_4 = $ $\alpha$, where $\alpha = epoch/125$.
#### **Image Augmentation:**
Image augmentation aids in broadening the statistical distribution of information content and combats overfitting [@Eivazi2019 | . Each training set is further divided into a 80 - 20 education / establishment stratify split based on bin pupil center locations of each image.
To deduce termination about change eye camera affectation and domain generalizability, each of the previously mentioned nervous network architectures (RITnet and SegNet), are discipline under three different configurations: a) education with S - NVGaze, b) training with S - OpenEDS, and c) training with a combination of randomly selected S - NVGaze and S - OpenEDS persona (50$\%$ each). A subset of images was set apart for model examination, including the entirety of the S - cosmopolitan dataset, 1500 random images extracted from each head model of the NVGaze dataset (60k persona), and 2392 images present in the official OpenEDS validation set.
# # # # * * Training :* *
We trained our model using the Adam optimizer [ @Kingma2014Adam: Optimization ] with a learning rate of 5e$^{-4}$ for 40 epochs. We reduced the learning rate by a factor of 10 when the validation loss plateaued for more than 5 era. Both models are trained use the passing function strategy project in RITnet [ @Chaudhary2019RITnet: trailing ]. This strategy involves using a leaden combination of four loss functions:
- cross - entropy loss $ \mathcal{L}_{CEL}$
- generalized dice passing [ @Sudre2017GeneralisedSegmentations ] $ \mathcal{L}_{GDL}$
- boundary aware loss $ \mathcal{L}_{BAL}$
- surface loss [ @Kervadec2018BoundarySegmentation ] $ \mathcal{L}_{SL}$
The entire loss $ \mathcal{L}$ is establish by a weighted combination of these losses as $ \mathcal{L } = \mathcal{L}_{CEL } (\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 \mathcal{L}_{BAL }) + \lambda_3 \mathcal{L}_{GDL } + \lambda_4 \mathcal{L}_{SL}$. In our experiments, we used $ \lambda_1 = 1 $, $ \lambda_2 = 20 $, $ \lambda_3 = $ (1 – $ \alpha$) and $ \lambda_4 = $ $ \alpha$, where $ \alpha = epoch/125$.
# # # # * * Image Augmentation :* *
Image augmentation aid in broadening the statistical distribution of information content and combat overfitting [ @Eivazi2019 | . Eafh training set is furthtr divided into a 80-20 trainmng/valisation sgratified split based on binied pupil center locations of exch image.
No derive conrlusions about vedying enz camsva povxs and domain ggneralizabilhty, each of tha orzviously mentioned neural network arshitectirfs (RITnet and FegNtt), wre fgalned under three different confifuratiois: a) training woth S-NVGaze, b) training witj S-OoenEDS, and c) trainlng with a xombybation of ravdomly seltcced S-NVGaze and S-OpenEDS images (50$\%$ each). A sucset pf images qaw sfj aside for nodel testing, including tve entitety of the S-Gcneran dqtaset, 1500 random images extracted from eash head mmdzl of the NVGaze datawer (60k ikagev), ana 2392 ioagts 'reaent ij tie official OpenEDS vaoidation set.
#### **Trainimg:**
Rv trained our modelf tsing the Adam optimizer [@Kingma2014Adam:Optimpzatjon] with a learning ratw of 5e$^{-4}$ for 40 epochs. We reduced ehe learning rate by a factor of 10 when the validadion muss pjxrewued for more than 5 epochs. Both models are trwjntd lsing the loss fukction strategy prpplsrq in RITnet [@Chxudharv2019DIFnet:Tracking]. This dtrategi invooves usind a eeighted combination of foue loss functpons:
- cross-entropy lods $\mathcal{L}_{EEL}$
- benerslized dice loss [@Sudre2017GeueraliaedSegmentahions] $\matgzal{L}_{GDL}$
- boundafy swdre loss $\mathcal{L}_{BAL}$
- sursace loss [@Jervcdec2018BounaaryXegmeneation] $\matjcal{L}_{SL}$
The total loss $\mahhcal{P}$ hs given bj a weighted combination of these losses as $\mstvcan{L} = \matheal{L}_{CEK} (\lambda_1 + \lamfda_2 \mathcal{L}_{BAK} ) + \lamyda_3 \maghcal{L}_{GDL} + \lambda_4 \mathcal{L}_{SL}$. In our experhlents, we usev $\lambda_1 = 1$, $\lanbda_2 = 20$, $\lambax_3 = $ (1 – $\alpha$) anc $\lambda_4 = $ $\alpha$, whwre $\alpha = epoch/125$.
#### **Ikagg Zugmentation:**
Imayt aotmentation aidx iv bwowdxning dhe statistiwal aisgtibutkon of infovmagion content and combats ovedfitting [@Eivazi2019 | . Each training set is further divided 80-20 stratified split on binned pupil To conclusions about varying camera poses and generalizability, each of the previously mentioned network architectures (RITnet and SegNet), are trained under three different configurations: a) training S-NVGaze, b) training with S-OpenEDS, and c) training with a combination of randomly S-NVGaze S-OpenEDS (50$\%$ A subset of images was set aside for model testing, including the entirety of the S-General 1500 random images extracted from each head model the NVGaze dataset (60k and 2392 images present in official validation set. **Training:** trained models using the optimizer [@Kingma2014Adam:Optimization] with a learning rate of 5e$^{-4}$ for 40 epochs. We reduced the learning rate by factor of the validation plateaued more 5 epochs. Both trained using the loss function strategy [@Chaudhary2019RITnet:Tracking]. This strategy involves using a weighted combination four loss - cross-entropy loss $\mathcal{L}_{CEL}$ - generalized loss [@Sudre2017GeneralisedSegmentations] $\mathcal{L}_{GDL}$ - boundary aware loss $\mathcal{L}_{BAL}$ surface loss [@Kervadec2018BoundarySegmentation] $\mathcal{L}_{SL}$ The total loss $\mathcal{L}$ is given by a weighted combination of as $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{CEL} + \lambda_2 \mathcal{L}_{BAL} + \mathcal{L}_{GDL} \lambda_4 In our we used $\lambda_1 = 1$, $\lambda_2 = 20$, $\lambda_3 = $ – $\alpha$) and $\lambda_4 = $ $\alpha$, where $\alpha = **Image Image augmentation aids broadening the statistical distribution information and combats overfitting [@Eivazi2019 | . Each training set is further dIvided into A 80-20 traiNinG/vaLiDatiOn stRatified split bASed oN binned pupil center locaTions Of EAch iMAgE.
To deRive conCLuSIOns AbOuT vaRyINg Eye caMerA poses aNd domain geNerAlIzability, eacH Of The previouSly Mentioned neuRal NetworK aRchITectuRes (rITneT and SeGnet), are Trained unDeR Three dIFferent CONfIgurAtions: a) training wiTH S-nvGaze, b) training With S-OPeNeDs, ANd c) TraIning with a CoMbinaTIon of raNDoMLY SelECted S-NVGaze anD S-OpenEDS imAGes (50$\%$ Each). A sUbSet OF imageS was sEt ASidE for model teStinG, includinG the enTIrety of THe S-GeneRal datAseT, 1500 raNdom IMaGeS exTrACteD FrOm eACh hEad model Of ThE NVGaZe daTASET (60k imAgeS), and 2392 ImageS present in the OffIciaL opeNEDS vAlidaTion SeT.
#### **TraiNing:**
We TrainEd Our models using tHe AdAm optimizEr [@KInGma2014adAm:OptIMizatiOn] wIth A learniNg rate oF 5E$^{-4}$ foR 40 ePOCHs. we reduced the learniNg RATe By a factoR of 10 wheN ThE vALidation LoSs pLateAUEd for More THaN 5 epochs. BOth modELs ArE traineD uSing thE lOss FunCtion STratEgy proPosed in RiTnet [@cHaudhary2019RITnet:tRacking]. This stRAtEGY iNVolvEs uSing a weightEd coMBinaTion OF fOur LOss fuNctioNs:
- CRoSS-entropy loss $\mathcal{l}_{CeL}$
- geneRalizEd dice loss [@SudRe2017GeneraliSEDsegmentaTionS] $\MaTHcal{L}_{GDL}$
- boundaRy awaRe loss $\mathCAl{L}_{BAL}$
- suRface Loss [@KervAdec2018BoundARYSegmentAtiOn] $\mAthCal{l}_{sl}$
THe total loss $\maTHCal{L}$ Is Given by A weIghted cOmbInaTioN of ThEse losses As $\mathcaL{L} = \MaThCaL{L}_{CeL} (\lamBDa_1 + \lambda_2 \MaThcAl{l}_{BAl} ) + \lambDA_3 \mathcAl{L}_{GDl} + \lamBdA_4 \mAThcAl{L}_{SL}$. In OUr EXPeriMeNtS, we uSed $\LaMbda_1 = 1$, $\lAmbdA_2 = 20$, $\LamBda_3 = $ (1 – $\alphA$) and $\lambdA_4 = $ $\alPHa$, whErE $\aLpha = epoCh/125$.
#### **Image AugmenTaTion:**
Image aUgMenTation AIDs in broaDening the statistical disTRibutioN of InforMatiOn content And CombatS ovERfittiNg [@EivaZi2019 | . Each training set is fur ther divid ed in toa 8 0- 20 t rain ing/validation stra tified split based onbinne dp upil ce nterlocatio n so f ea ch i mag e.
T o der ive conclu sions abou t v ar ying eye cam e ra poses and do main general iza bility ,eac h of t heprevi ouslym ention ed neural n e tworka rchitec t u re s (R ITnet and SegNet) , a r e trained unde r thre ed if f e ren t c onfigurati on s: a) trainin g w i t h S- N VGaze, b) tra ining withS -Op enEDS, a ndc ) trai ningwi t h a combinatio n of randomly selec t ed S-NV G aze and S-Ope nED S i mage s ( 50 $\% $e ach ) .A s u bse t of ima ge swas s et a s i d e for mo deltesti ng, including th e en t ire ty of theS-Ge ne ral d ataset , 150 0random images e xtra cted from ea ch he ad mode l of th e N VGa ze data set (60 k im ag e s ) ,and 2392 images pr es e n tin the o fficia l O pe n EDS vali da tio n se t .
### # ** T ra ining:**
We t r ai ne d our m od els us in g t heAdamo ptim izer [ @Kingma2 014Ad a m:Optimization ] with a learn i ng r at e of5e$ ^{-4}$ for40 e p ochs . We re duc e d the lear ni n gr ate by a factor of10 whenthe v alidation los s plateaue d f or morethan 5e pochs. Both mo delsare traine d using t he lo ss funct ion strat e g y propos edinRIT net [ @C haudhary2019R I T net: Tr acking] . T his str ate gyinv olv es using aweighted c om bi na tio n off our loss f unc ti ons :
- cross -entr opylo ss $\m athcal{ L }_ { C EL}$
- ge ner al izeddice los s [@Sud re2017Gen era l ised Se gm entatio ns] $\mathcal {L }_{GDL}$
- b oundar y aware lo ss $\mathcal{L}_{BAL}$- sur fac e los s [@ Kervadec2 018 Bounda ryS e gmenta tion]$\mat hc al{ L } _{SL} $
T heto tal loss $ \ m ath cal{L }$ isgiven b y a weighted combi n ati on of these l oss es a s $\ mat h ca l {L} = \ma t h cal{L}_{CEL} (\ lambda_1 + \ l am bda_2 \mat h cal {L }_{BAL} ) + \l ambda _ 3 \math cal{L}_{G DL} + \la mb da_4 \ mat hcal{L}_{S L}$. Inour exper i ments , w e use d $ \lambd a_ 1 = 1$,$\lamb d a_2 = 20 $, $\l am bda_3= $ ( 1– $\alph a$) and $\lambda_4 = $$\alph a$, w her e $\alpha =e poc h/125$.
#### **Image A ugm ent ation :**
Imag e au g me nta t ion a idsi n broaden i ng th e st atistical d i s t rib ution of inform atio n content and com b ats overfittin g [@ E i vaz i20 1 9 | . Each_training set_is further divided into_a 80-20_training/validation_stratified split_based_on binned pupil_center locations of_each image.
To derive conclusions_about varying eye_camera_poses and domain generalizability, each of the previously mentioned neural network architectures (RITnet and_SegNet),_are trained_under_three_different configurations: a) training with_S-NVGaze, b) training with S-OpenEDS,_and c)_training with a combination of randomly selected S-NVGaze_and_S-OpenEDS images (50$\%$_each). A subset of images was set aside for_model testing, including the entirety of_the S-General dataset,_1500_random_images extracted from each_head model of the NVGaze dataset_(60k images), and 2392 images present_in the official OpenEDS validation set.
#### **Training:**
We_trained our models using the Adam_optimizer [@Kingma2014Adam:Optimization] with a learning rate_of 5e$^{-4}$_for 40 epochs. We reduced_the learning rate_by a_factor of 10_when the validation loss plateaued for_more than 5_epochs. Both models are trained using_the_loss function strategy_proposed_in_RITnet [@Chaudhary2019RITnet:Tracking]. This_strategy involves using_a_weighted combination_of_four loss functions:
- cross-entropy_loss_$\mathcal{L}_{CEL}$
- generalized dice loss [@Sudre2017GeneralisedSegmentations] $\mathcal{L}_{GDL}$
-_ boundary aware_loss_$\mathcal{L}_{BAL}$
- surface_loss [@Kervadec2018BoundarySegmentation] $\mathcal{L}_{SL}$
The total loss $\mathcal{L}$_is given by a weighted combination_of these_losses as_$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{CEL} (\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 \mathcal{L}_{BAL} ) + \lambda_3 \mathcal{L}_{GDL}_+ \lambda_4 \mathcal{L}_{SL}$. In our experiments,_we used $\lambda_1 =_1$, $\lambda_2_=_20$, $\lambda_3 =_$_(1 –_$\alpha$) and $\lambda_4 = $ $\alpha$, where_$\alpha =_epoch/125$.
#### **Image Augmentation:**
Image augmentation aids in_broadening the statistical distribution_of_information content and combats overfitting [@Eivazi2019 |
contains elements of order $p$.
To give an example, we first introduce some notation. For a sequence $\lambda = (\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_r)$ of nonnegative integers summing to $n$, let ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ be the Young group ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_1}} \times \cdots \times
{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_r}}$. Given a set partition $(U_1, \ldots, U_r)$ of $\{1, \ldots, n\}$ such that $|U_a| = \lambda_a$ for $1 \le a \le r$, we obtain a natural action on $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ by letting ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_a}}$ act on $U_a$ in the natural manner for each $a$; for a group element $\pi \in
{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$, the action is given by replacing the edge $xy
= \{x,y\}$ with the edge $\pi(x)\pi(y)$ for each choice of distinct elements $x, y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$.
In Section \[lambdascc-sec\], we demonstrate that $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})/{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ is isomorphic to the chain complex of a certain simplicial complex ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$. The vertices of this complex are all edges and loops on $\{1, \ldots,
r\}$; a loop is a multiset of the form $xx = \{x,x\}$). A collection of edges and loops is a face of ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$ if and only if the total number of occurrences of the element $a$ in the edges and loops is at most $\lambda_a$ for $1 \le a
\le r$. By a computer-based result due to Andersen [@Andersen], $\tilde{H}_4({\mathsf{BD}_{7}^{2}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ is a cyclic group of order five. As a consequence, the following is true.
\[matchtor-prop\] $\tilde{H}_{4}({\mathsf{M}_{14}}; {\mathbb{Z}})$ contains elements of order $5$.
The proof [@matchtor] of Proposition \[matchtor-prop\] | contains elements of order $ p$.
To give an case, we foremost introduce some notation. For a succession $ \lambda = (\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_r)$ of nonnegative integers total to $ n$, let $ { \mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ be the Young group $ { \mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_1 } } \times \cdots \times
{ \mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_r}}$. Given a set division $ (U_1, \ldots, U_r)$ of $ \{1, \ldots, n\}$ such that $ |U_a| = \lambda_a$ for $ 1 \le a \le r$, we prevail a natural military action on $ \mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ by letting $ { \mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_a}}$ act on $ U_a$ in the natural manner for each $ a$; for a group chemical element $ \pi \in
{ \mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$, the action is given by replace the edge $ xy
= \{x, y\}$ with the edge $ \pi(x)\pi(y)$ for each choice of distinct elements $ x, y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$.
In Section \[lambdascc - sec\ ], we show that $ \mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})/{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ is isomorphic to the chain complex of a sealed simplicial complex $ { \mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$. The vertices of this building complex are all edges and cringle on $ \{1, \ldots,
r\}$; a loop is a multiset of the form $ xx = \{x, x\}$). A collection of edges and loops is a side of $ { \mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$ if and only if the total number of occurrences of the element $ a$ in the edge and loop is at most $ \lambda_a$ for $ 1 \le a
\le r$. By a computer - based result due to Andersen [ @Andersen ], $ \tilde{H}_4({\mathsf{BD}_{7}^{2}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ is a cyclic group of order five. As a consequence, the following is true.
\[matchtor - prop\ ] $ \tilde{H}_{4}({\mathsf{M}_{14 } }; { \mathbb{Z}})$ contains component of order $ 5$.
The proof [ @matchtor ] of Proposition \[matchtor - prop\ ] | cojtains elements of order $p$.
To give an excnple, wx first introduze some notation. For a sequeice $\oambdq = (\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_f)$ of nonnvgative ibtegtrs summing to $n$, let ${\mathnxak{S}_{\lzlbda}}$ ue the Young grpup ${\mathfrdk{S}_{\lambda_1}} \timev \zdlts \times
{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_r}}$. Given a set pattltion $(U_1, \ldots, U_r)$ ps $\{1, \lsots, n\}$ such that $|U_a| = \lambda_a$ for $1 \me a \le r$, we obtain s natural action on $\mathcap{C}({\mahhsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ by lftting ${\mathdrak{F}_{\oambda_a}}$ act un $U_a$ in the natural mznner for each $a$; for a group eldment $\pi \in
{\majkdran{V}_{\lambda}}$, the actijn is given nj replawing thr edge $xy
= \{x,y\}$ wivh tye edge $\pi(x)\pi(y)$ for earh choice of distincj elements $x, y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$.
In Wextion \[nambgascz-wec\], we dxmohstratf tiat $\mathcal{D}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\marhbb{Z}})/{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambds}}$ yw isomorphic fo the crain complex of a certain simplicial cokplsx ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$. The certices of this comppex are ajl edges and loops on $\{1, \ldots,
r\}$; a loop is a multivet oh ghe fjfn $dx = \{x,x\}$). A collection of edges and loops is a fwde on ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambdc}}$ if and only if tje jotal number ow occuxdehces of the elemenh $a$ in jhe edtes and ljops is at most $\lambda_a$ for $1 \le a
\le r$. By c cimputer-based resulc due to Andzrsen [@Snderxen], $\tilde{H}_4({\mathsf{BD}_{7}^{2}};{\mathby{Z}})$ is z cyclic grlup of orsdr five. As a conreqlenca, the following is true.
\[matshtor-prop\] $\tilbe{H}_{4}({\mathsw{M}_{14}}; {\msthbb{Z}})$ contains flemekds of order $5$.
The prlof [@mctchtmr] of Proplsition \[matchtor-prop\] | contains elements of order $p$. To give we introduce some For a sequence of integers summing to let ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ be Young group ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_1}} \times \cdots \times Given a set partition $(U_1, \ldots, U_r)$ of $\{1, \ldots, n\}$ such that = \lambda_a$ for $1 \le a \le r$, we obtain a natural action $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ letting act $U_a$ in the natural manner for each $a$; for a group element $\pi \in {\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$, the is given by replacing the edge $xy = with the edge $\pi(x)\pi(y)$ each choice of distinct elements y \{1, \ldots, In \[lambdascc-sec\], demonstrate that $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})/{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ isomorphic to the chain complex of a certain simplicial complex ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$. The vertices of this complex are edges and $\{1, \ldots, a is multiset of the = \{x,x\}$). A collection of edges a face of ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$ if and only if total number occurrences of the element $a$ in edges and loops is at most $\lambda_a$ for \le a \le r$. By a computer-based result due to Andersen [@Andersen], $\tilde{H}_4({\mathsf{BD}_{7}^{2}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ is a of order five. As consequence, the following true. $\tilde{H}_{4}({\mathsf{M}_{14}}; contains of order The proof [@matchtor] of Proposition \[matchtor-prop\] | contains elements of order $p$.
TO give an exaMple, wE fiRst InTrodUce sOme notation. For A SequEnce $\lambda = (\lambda_1, \ldots, \lAmbda_R)$ oF NonnEGaTive iNtegers SUmMINg tO $n$, LeT ${\maThFRaK{S}_{\lamBda}}$ Be the YoUng group ${\maThfRaK{S}_{\lambda_1}} \timeS \CdOts \times
{\maThfRak{S}_{\lambda_r}}$. GIveN a set pArTitIOn $(U_1, \ldOts, u_r)$ of $\{1, \lDots, n\}$ sUCh that $|u_a| = \lambda_a$ FoR $1 \Le a \le r$, WE obtain A NAtUral Action on $\mathcal{C}({\mAThSF{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ by leTting ${\mAtHFrAK{s}_{\laMbdA_a}}$ act on $U_a$ iN tHe natURal mannER fOR EAch $A$; For a group elemEnt $\pi \in
{\mathFRak{s}_{\lambdA}}$, tHe aCTion is Given By REplAcing the edgE $xy
= \{x,Y\}$ with the eDge $\pi(x)\PI(y)$ for eaCH choice Of distIncT elEmenTS $x, Y \iN \{1, \ldOtS, N\}$.
In sEcTioN \[LamBdascc-seC\], wE dEmonsTratE THAT $\matHcaL{C}({\maThsf{M}_{N}};{\mathbb{Z}})/{\mathfRak{s}_{\lamBDa}}$ iS isomOrphiC to tHe Chain CompleX of a cErTain simplicial cOmplEx ${\mathsf{Bd}_{r}^{\lAmBda}}$. thE vertICes of tHis ComPlex are All edgeS And LoOPS On $\{1, \Ldots,
r\}$; a loop is a multIsET Of The form $xX = \{x,x\}$). A coLLeCtIOn of edgeS aNd lOops IS A face Of ${\maTHsF{BD}_{r}^{\lambDa}}$ if anD OnLy If the toTaL numbeR oF ocCurRenceS Of thE elemeNt $a$ in the Edges ANd loops is at mosT $\Lambda_a$ for $1 \le a
\LE r$. bY A cOMputEr-bAsed result dUe to aNderSen [@ANDeRseN], $\Tilde{h}_4({\mathSf{bd}_{7}^{2}};{\mAThbb{Z}})$ is a cyclic group Of Order fIve. As A consequence, tHe followinG IS True.
\[matcHtor-PRoP\] $\Tilde{H}_{4}({\mathsf{M}_{14}}; {\mAthbb{z}})$ contains eLEments of Order $5$.
the proof [@Matchtor] oF pRopositiOn \[mAtcHtoR-prOP\] | contains elements of orde r $p$.
To give an ex am ple, wefirst introduc e som e notation. For a sequ ence$\ l ambd a = (\la mbda_1, \l d o ts, \ la mbd a_ r )$ of n onn egative integerssum mi ng to $n$, l e t${\mathfra k{S }_{\lambda}} $ b e theYo ung group ${ \math frak{S } _{\lam bda_1}} \ ti m es \cd o ts \tim e s
{\m athfrak{S}_{\lamb d a_ r }}$. Given a s et par ti t io n $(U _1, \ldots, U_ r)$ o f $\{1,\ ld o t s , n \ }$ such that$|U_a| = \l a mbd a_a$ f or $1 \le a\le r $, weobtain a na tura l actionon $\m a thcal{C } ({\math sf{M}_ {n} };{ \mat h bb {Z }}) $b y l e tt ing ${\ mathfrak {S }_ {\lam bda_ a } } $ act on $U_ a$ in the naturalman nerf oreach$a$;foragroup eleme nt $\ pi \in
{\mathfr ak{S }_{\lambd a}} $, th eactio n is gi ven by replac ing the edg e$ x y
= \{x,y\}$ with t he e dg e $\pi(x )\pi(y ) $fo r each ch oi ceof d i s tinct ele m en ts $x, y \in \ { 1, \ ldots,n\ }$.
I nSec tio n \[l a mbda scc-se c\], wedemon s trate that $\m a thcal{C}({\ma t hs f { M} _ {n}} ;{\ mathbb{Z}}) /{\m a thfr ak{S } _{ \la m bda}} $ isis o mo r phic to the chain c om plex o f a c ertain simpli cial compl e x ${\maths f{BD } _{ r }^{\lambda}}$. Thevertices o f this co mplex are all edges an d loops on $\ {1, \l dot s ,
r\}$; a loop i s amu ltisetofthe for m $ xx= \ {x, x\ }$). A co llection o fed ge s a nd lo o ps is afa ceof ${ \math s f{BD}_ {r}^{ \lam bd a} } $ i f and o n ly i f th eto talnum be r ofoccu r ren ces ofthe eleme nt$ a$ i nth e edges and loops is a t most $\l am bda _a$ fo r $1 \le a
\le r$. By a compute r -basedres ult d ue t o Anderse n [ @Ander sen ] , $\ti lde{H} _4({\ ma ths f { BD}_{ 7 } ^{ 2}} ;{ \mathbb{Z} } ) $ i s a c yc licgroup o f order five. As a con sequence, the fo llow i n gist ru e .
\[ m atc h t or-prop\] $\til de{H}_{4}( {\ m at hsf{M}_{14 } };{\ mathbb{ Z}})$ c ontai n s eleme nts of or der $5$.
T he p r o of[@matchtor ] of Pro position\ [matc h to r-pro p\] | contains_elements of_order $p$.
To give an_example, we_first_introduce some_notation._For a sequence_$\lambda = (\lambda_1,_\ldots, \lambda_r)$ of nonnegative_integers summing to_$n$,_let ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ be the Young group ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_1}} \times \cdots \times
{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_r}}$. Given a_set_partition $(U_1,_\ldots,__U_r)$ of $\{1, \ldots, n\}$_such that $|U_a| = \lambda_a$_for $1_\le a \le r$, we obtain a natural_action_on $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ by_letting ${\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda_a}}$ act on $U_a$ in the natural manner_for each $a$; for a group_element $\pi \in
__{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$,_the action is given_by replacing the edge $xy
_= \{x,y\}$ with the edge $\pi(x)\pi(y)$_for each choice of distinct elements $x,_y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$.
In Section \[lambdascc-sec\],_we demonstrate that $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{n}};{\mathbb{Z}})/{\mathfrak{S}_{\lambda}}$ is_isomorphic to_the chain complex of a_certain simplicial complex_${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$. The_vertices of this_complex are all edges and loops_on $\{1, \ldots,
_ r\}$; a loop is a_multiset_of the form_$xx_=_\{x,x\}$). A_collection of edges_and_loops is_a_face of ${\mathsf{BD}_{r}^{\lambda}}$ if and only_if_the total number of occurrences of the_element $a$ in the_edges_and loops is at_most $\lambda_a$ for $1 \le_a
\le r$. By a_computer-based result_due to_Andersen [@Andersen], $\tilde{H}_4({\mathsf{BD}_{7}^{2}};{\mathbb{Z}})$ is a cyclic group of order five. As_a consequence, the following is true.
\[matchtor-prop\]_$\tilde{H}_{4}({\mathsf{M}_{14}}; {\mathbb{Z}})$ contains elements_of order_$5$.
The_proof [@matchtor] of_Proposition \[matchtor-prop\] |
to-metal transition occurs (open squares). The opposite phase transition (metal-to-insulator) can be observed in \[fig:CurrentMIT\_IR\_ins\] upon decreasing current, as indicated by the open diamonds. We note that the square and diamond markers lie, within our experimental resolution, within the ranges of $\Tim$ and $\Tmi$, respectively. This indicates that the current-driven MIT is triggered whenever the local temperature of an area goes above $\Tim$ or below $\Tmi$. The experimental setup used in the present work does not allow us to detect additional non-thermal effects induced by the electrical current, which may have caused changes in $\Tim$ and $\Tmi$ smaller than our uncertainty of.
Current-driven MIT in the presence of cracks and defects
--------------------------------------------------------
To study how the formation of cracks and defects affects the current-driven MIT, we perform multiple current cycles that bring the sample to the metallic state and then back to the insulating state. The thermal bath is fixed at $\Tp=\SI{25}{\celsius}$. The current is increased up to a few larger than what required to switch the entire sample to the metallic phase, and then decreased back to zero (rates of ). We show in \[fig:Fatigue\_V,fig:Fatigue\_A\] the two-probe $V$–$I$ characteristics and value of $\Ai$ measured during nine consecutive cycles. At each cycle, the voltage peak increases and shifts to lower currents (triangles in \[fig:Fatigue\_V\]) and to lower corresponding current densities ($\jp$ in \[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). Concomitantly, the entire sample turns metallic at a lower current (stars in \[fig:Fatigue\_A\]) and current density ($\ja$ in \[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). This occurs because a higher power is dissipated in the sample due to its increased resistance. The drop of more than one order of magnitude in $\ja$ indicates large and irreversible changes in the sample properties, consistent with the previous observation of crack formation at similar current values.
The formation of cracks and defects strongly affects the temperature distribution over the sample surface, leading to the formation of hot spots responsible for higher power dissipation, as can be seen in the images of \[fig:Fatigue\_imgs\]. It is clear that, despite the comparable values of $\Ai$, the presence of hot spots in the lower left (right) corner during the 2nd (8th) | to - metal transition occurs (open public square). The diametric phase transition (metal - to - insulator) can be note in \[fig: CurrentMIT\_IR\_ins\ ] upon decrease current, as indicated by the open diamond. We notice that the square and diamond markers lie, within our experimental resolution, within the range of $ \Tim$ and $ \Tmi$, respectively. This indicates that the current - driven MIT is triggered whenever the local temperature of an area goes above $ \Tim$ or below $ \Tmi$. The experimental setup use in the present work does not allow us to detect additional non - thermal effect induced by the electrical current, which may have caused change in $ \Tim$ and $ \Tmi$ smaller than our uncertainty of.
Current - driven MIT in the presence of cracks and defect
--------------------------------------------------------
To study how the formation of cracks and defects affects the current - driven MIT, we perform multiple current cycles that bring the sample to the metallic state and then back to the insulating state. The thermal bath is fixed at $ \Tp=\SI{25}{\celsius}$. The current is increased up to a few larger than what necessitate to switch the entire sample distribution to the metallic phase, and then decrease back to zero (rate of). We show in \[fig: Fatigue\_V, fig: Fatigue\_A\ ] the two - probe $ V$–$I$ characteristic and value of $ \Ai$ measured during nine consecutive cycles. At each cycle, the electric potential peak increases and shifts to lower currents (triangles in \[fig: Fatigue\_V\ ]) and to lower corresponding current densities ($ \jp$ in \[fig: Fatigue\_j\ ]). Concomitantly, the entire sample turns metallic at a gloomy current (star in \[fig: Fatigue\_A\ ]) and current density ($ \ja$ in \[fig: Fatigue\_j\ ]). This occurs because a higher power is dissipated in the sample distribution due to its increased resistance. The drop of more than one order of magnitude in $ \ja$ indicates large and irreversible changes in the sample property, consistent with the former observation of crack formation at similar current values.
The constitution of cracks and defect strongly involve the temperature distribution over the sample surface, precede to the formation of blistering spots responsible for higher office dissipation, as can be seen in the images of \[fig: Fatigue\_imgs\ ]. It is clear that, despite the comparable values of $ \Ai$, the bearing of hot spots in the low left (right) corner during the 2nd (8th ) | to-mftal transition occurs (oken squares). The okpisite 'hase tdansitiov (metal-to-insulator) can be obdeeved un \[fig:CurrentMIT\_IR\_ins\] jpon decrvasing cuerenu, as indicated by the opek diajlnds. Xe note that thg square and diamond markess lne, within our experimental resolutiog, withim hhe ranges of $\Jim$ amq $\Tmj$, respectively. This indicates that the cugrent-driven MIT ix triggered whenever the llcal temperature of an area goes qbovq $\Tim$ or belod $\Tmi$. The tx'erimental aetup used in the present work aoes uot allow uw ro fgtect additiinal gon-thermal engects hnduced by the electrlcal rurrwnt, which may have cansed changes in $\Tim$ wnd $\Tmi$ skamler than our uncwrrainti of.
Cgrrevr-drkveh KIF in tje 'resence of cracks and defects
--------------------------------------------------------
To study hoe eye formation kf craskf and defects affects the current-driven MIF, we perform multiple cyrrent cycles that brlng the swmple to the metallic state and then back to the hnsuletkng sbate. Rhf thermal bath is fixed at $\Tp=\SI{25}{\celsius}$. The cuwdemt is increased mp to a few larger tjam what requirea to scjtdh the entire samppe to tre merallic phwse, snd then decreased back to zero (rates oy ). Qe show in \[fig:Fatiyue\_V,fig:Fatigbe\_A\] thg two-ptobe $V$–$I$ characteristics and value of $\Al$ measures during nine conrecltiva cycles. At each cycle, the voltage 'eak nncreaser anc shifes to loweg curvants (triangles in \[vig:Fajigue\_V\]) and to loaer corresponding current densivmes ($\jp$ in \[fig:Gadigle\_j\]). Concoiitanbly, the entire fample turns mgtallic ac a loder currenn (stars ii \[fig:Fatigue\_W\]) and current fensity ($\ja$ ii \[fig:Fatidue\_j\]). Thiw occurr because a higner power is dissipqted in the sample dug fo its increaseb twsistance. The croo os loce thwt one order mf mxgnkyude kn $\ja$ indicctds lsrge and irreversibla chznges in the samplr iropertiew, consiseent with the previous observatlon oh cracy forkatyon at similar current values.
Tge formatlon of cracks agd dcfecjs strongly affects the temperature distribution oter the sample surface, oeading to the formctlon of hot s'ots rqsponsibla for higher power dussipation, as can be seen in the imagea of \[fhg:Fatlgue\_imgs\]. It is clear that, despite the comparable values of $\Ai$, the presencw of hot spots in fhe kower lzft (right) coriec during the 2nd (8tn) | to-metal transition occurs (open squares). The opposite (metal-to-insulator) be observed \[fig:CurrentMIT\_IR\_ins\] upon decreasing open We note that square and diamond lie, within our experimental resolution, within ranges of $\Tim$ and $\Tmi$, respectively. This indicates that the current-driven MIT is whenever the local temperature of an area goes above $\Tim$ or below $\Tmi$. experimental used the work does not allow us to detect additional non-thermal effects induced by the electrical current, which have caused changes in $\Tim$ and $\Tmi$ smaller our uncertainty of. Current-driven in the presence of cracks defects To study the of and defects affects current-driven MIT, we perform multiple current cycles that bring the sample to the metallic state and then to the The thermal is at The current is to a few larger than what the entire sample to the metallic phase, and decreased back zero (rates of ). We show \[fig:Fatigue\_V,fig:Fatigue\_A\] the two-probe $V$–$I$ characteristics and value of measured during nine consecutive cycles. At each cycle, the voltage peak increases and shifts to (triangles in \[fig:Fatigue\_V\]) and lower corresponding current ($\jp$ \[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). the sample turns at a lower current (stars in \[fig:Fatigue\_A\]) and current density ($\ja$ \[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). This occurs because a higher power is dissipated in due its increased resistance. drop of more than order magnitude in $\ja$ indicates irreversible in consistent the observation of crack formation similar current values. The formation cracks and defects strongly the sample surface, leading to the formation of spots responsible for higher power dissipation, as be seen in the images of \[fig:Fatigue\_imgs\]. It is clear that, despite comparable values the presence of hot spots in the lower (right) corner during the (8th) | to-metal transition occurs (opEn squares). THe oppOsiTe pHaSe trAnsiTion (metal-to-insULatoR) can be observed in \[fig:CurRentMiT\_ir\_ins\] UPoN decrEasing cURrENT, as InDiCatEd BY tHe opeN diAmonds. WE note that tHe sQuAre and diamonD MaRkers lie, wiThiN our experimeNtaL resolUtIon, WIthin The RangeS of $\Tim$ ANd $\Tmi$, rEspectiveLy. tHis indICates thAT ThE curRent-driven MIT is trIGgERed whenever the Local tEmPErATUre Of aN area goes aBoVe $\Tim$ OR below $\TMI$. THE EXpeRImental setup uSed in the preSEnt Work doEs Not ALlow us To detEcT AddItional non-tHermAl effects InduceD By the elECtrical CurrenT, whIch May hAVe CaUseD cHAngES iN $\TiM$ And $\tmi$ smallEr ThAn our UnceRTAINty oF.
CuRrenT-drivEn MIT in the preSenCe of CRacKs and DefecTs
--------------------------------------------------------
To StUdy hoW the foRmatiOn Of cracks and defeCts aFfects the CurReNt-dRiVen MIt, We perfOrm MulTiple cuRrent cyCLes ThAT BRiNg the sample to the meTaLLIc State and Then baCK tO tHE insulatInG stAte. THE ThermAl baTH iS fixed at $\tp=\SI{25}{\ceLSiUs}$. the currEnT is incReAseD up To a feW LargEr than What requIred tO Switch the entirE Sample to the meTAlLIC pHAse, aNd tHen decreaseD bacK To zeRo (raTEs Of ). WE Show iN \[fig:FAtIGuE\_v,fig:Fatigue\_A\] the two-pRoBe $V$–$I$ chAractEristics and vaLue of $\Ai$ meaSUREd during Nine COnSEcutive cycles. AT each Cycle, the voLTage peak IncreAses and sHifts to loWER currentS (trIanGleS in \[FIG:FAtigue\_V\]) and to lOWEr coRrEspondiNg cUrrent dEnsItiEs ($\jP$ in \[FiG:Fatigue\_j\]). concomitAnTlY, tHe EntIre saMPle turns MeTalLiC at A loweR CurrenT (starS in \[fIg:faTIguE\_A\]) and cuRReNT DensItY ($\jA$ in \[fIg:FAtIgue\_j\]). this OCcuRs becauSe a higher PowER is dIsSiPated in The sample due tO iTs increaseD rEsiStance. tHE drop of mOre than one order of magnitUDe in $\ja$ iNdiCates LargE and irrevErsIble chAngES in the Sample PropeRtIes, CONsistENT wIth ThE previous oBSErvAtion Of CracK formatIon at similar currenT ValUes.
The formatiOn oF craCKS aNd dEFeCTs sTrONglY AFfects the temperAture distrIbUTiOn over the sAMplE sUrface, lEading tO the fORmation Of hot spotS responsiBlE for HIGheR power dissIpation, aS can be seeN In the IMaGes of \[Fig:fatiguE\_iMgs\]. it is cLear thAT, deSpite The comPaRable vAlues Of $\ai$, the preSence of hot spots in the lowEr left (Right) CorNer during The 2ND (8th) | to-metal transition occurs (open squ ares) . T heop posi te p hase transitio n (me tal-to-insulator) canbe ob se r vedi n\[fig :Curren t MI T \ _IR \_ in s\] u p on decr eas ing cur rent, as i ndi ca ted by the o p en diamonds. We note that t hesquare a ndd iamon d m arker s lie, within our expe ri m entalr esoluti o n ,with in the ranges of$ \T i m$ and $\Tmi$, respe ct i ve l y . T his indicates t hat t h e curre n t- d r i ven MIT is trigge red wheneve r th e loca ltem p eratur e ofan are a goes abov e $\ Tim$ or b elow $ \ Tmi$. T h e exper imenta l s etu p us e din th ep res e nt wo r k d oes notal lo w usto d e t e c t ad dit iona l non -thermal effe cts ind u ced by t he el ectr ic al cu rrent, whic hmay have caused cha nges in $ \Ti m$ an d$\Tmi $ small ertha n our u ncertai n tyof . Cu rrent-driven MIT i nt h epresence of cr a ck sa nd defec ts
-- ---- - - ----- ---- - -- -------- ------ - -- -- ------- -- ------ --
T o s tudyh ow t he for mation o f cra c ks and defects affects the c u rr e n t- d rive n M IT, we perf ormm ulti plec ur ren t cycl es th at br i ng the sample to th emetall ic st ate and thenback to th e i nsulatin g st a te . The thermal b ath i s fixed at $\Tp=\SI {25}{ \celsius }$. The c u r rent isinc rea sed up t oa few largert h an w ha t requi red to swi tch th e e nti re sample t o the me ta ll ic p has e, an d then de cr eas ed ba ck to zero ( rates of). W e sh ow in \ [ fi g : Fati gu e\ _V,f ig: Fa tigue \_A\ ] th e two-p robe $V$– $I$ char ac te ristics and value of $ \Ai$ measu re d d uringn i ne conse cutive cycles. At eachc ycle, t hevolta ge p eak incre ase s andshi f ts tolowercurre nt s ( t r iangl e s i n \ [f ig:Fatigue \ _ V\] ) and t o lo wer cor responding current den sities ($\jp$ in \[f i g :F ati g ue \ _j\ ]) . Co n c omitantly, theentire sam pl e t urns metal l icat a lowe r curre nt (s t ars in\[fig:Fat igue\_A\] )andc u rre nt density ($\ja$in \[fig: F atigu e \_ j\]). Th is occ ur s b ecaus e a hi g her powe r is d is sipate d inth e sample due to its increased r esista nce.The drop ofmor e th an one or derof magnitu dein$\ja$ in d icate s la r ge an d irre vers i ble chang e sint h esample prop e r t ies , con sis t ent wi th t he previous obser v ation of crack for m a tio n a t sim il ar current val ues .T he forma ti on of crack s and de fe c ts st rongly affec ts thet e mp e rature dis tri bution ov erth e sample s ur f ace, l eadi ng to th e form a tion o f hot spots resp onsib l e forh igh er po we r dissi p atio n, as canbe seen inthe im ages of \ [fig:Fa ti gue\_i mgs \] . It is cl e ar that,despi te theco mpar abl e valu es o f $\Ai$ , th epre sence ofh o ts po ts inthelower l eft(right) c o rner dur ing the 2nd ( 8th ) | to-metal transition_occurs (open_squares). The opposite phase_transition (metal-to-insulator)_can_be observed_in_\[fig:CurrentMIT\_IR\_ins\] upon decreasing_current, as indicated_by the open diamonds._We note that_the_square and diamond markers lie, within our experimental resolution, within the ranges of $\Tim$_and_$\Tmi$, respectively._This_indicates_that the current-driven MIT is_triggered whenever the local temperature_of an_area goes above $\Tim$ or below $\Tmi$. The_experimental_setup used in_the present work does not allow us to detect_additional non-thermal effects induced by the_electrical current, which_may_have_caused changes in $\Tim$_and $\Tmi$ smaller than our uncertainty_of.
Current-driven MIT in the presence of_cracks and defects
--------------------------------------------------------
To study how the formation_of cracks and defects affects the_current-driven MIT, we perform multiple_current cycles_that bring the sample to_the metallic state_and then_back to the_insulating state. The thermal bath is_fixed at $\Tp=\SI{25}{\celsius}$._The current is increased up to_a_few larger than_what_required_to switch_the entire sample_to_the metallic_phase,_and then decreased back to zero_(rates_of ). We show in \[fig:Fatigue\_V,fig:Fatigue\_A\] the_two-probe $V$–$I$ characteristics and_value_of $\Ai$ measured during_nine consecutive cycles. At each_cycle, the voltage peak increases and_shifts to_lower currents_(triangles in \[fig:Fatigue\_V\]) and to lower corresponding current densities ($\jp$ in_\[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). Concomitantly, the entire sample turns_metallic at a lower_current (stars_in_\[fig:Fatigue\_A\]) and current_density_($\ja$ in_\[fig:Fatigue\_j\]). This occurs because a higher power_is dissipated_in the sample due to its_increased resistance. The drop_of_more than one order of magnitude_in $\ja$ indicates large and irreversible_changes in the sample properties,_consistent_with_the previous observation of crack_formation at similar current values.
The formation_of cracks and_defects strongly affects the temperature distribution over_the_sample surface, leading to the formation_of_hot spots responsible for higher power_dissipation,_as_can be seen in the_images of \[fig:Fatigue\_imgs\]. It is clear_that, despite the comparable values of $\Ai$, the presence_of hot spots_in the lower left (right)_corner_during_the 2nd (8th) |
form at the stagnation points of the flow where the compression is at a maximum and the relative velocity differences are at a minimum. The origin of coherence is not so clear, but we speculate that it may be caused by projection, because the line-of-sight length of the matter contributing to the line profile has a minimum at the core center, and small offsets from the center therefore cause little variation in the observed line width.
Molecular cloud cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identified by the presence of sink particles in our models) are characterized by having $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for those objects our estimates to $M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits to the true value. On the other hand, most of the cores without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, and thus are *not* gravitationally bound. This is in agreement with the observational results of Tachihara et al. (2002) and Morata et al. (2002) for starless cores. However, also some observed “starless” cores seem to lie close to or even fall below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et al. 2002), and we speculate that at least some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects, as is in the case of core L1014 (Young et al. 2004).
The fact that cores in the gravoturbulent model are initially created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger-scale flows leads to the velocity dispersion being highest in the low column-density gas at the surface of the clump, either at localized positions or with bow-like shapes. Such structure is often found in detailed high-resolution velocity maps of observed starless cores (e.g., Barranco & Goodman 1998; Goodman et al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et al. 2004). However, it is not predicted or explained within the framework of star-formation models based on the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated by ambipolar diffusion.
Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular cloud core is formed by turbulent ram pressure compression. As it gains mass and becomes denser, both its internal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For some cores, the gravitational attraction may exceed any opposing forces (either thermal or magnetic), and the core goes into collapse to quickly build up | form at the stagnation points of the flow where the compression is at a utmost and the proportional speed differences are at a minimum. The origin of coherence is not so well-defined, but we speculate that it may be caused by project, because the line - of - sight duration of the matter contributing to the tune profile has a minimum at the congress of racial equality plaza, and small offsets from the center therefore cause small variation in the observed line width.
Molecular swarm cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identify by the presence of sinkhole particles in our models) are characterized by having $ M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for those objects our estimate to $ M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits to the true value. On the other hand, most of the effect without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir } > M$, and thus are * not * gravitationally bound. This is in agreement with the observational results of Tachihara et al. (2002) and Morata et al. (2002) for starless cores. However, also some ascertained “ starless ” core seem to lie down near to or even decrease below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et al. 2002), and we speculate that at least some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub - leading objects, as is in the case of core L1014 (Young et al. 2004).
The fact that cores in the gravoturbulent model are initially created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger - scale flows leads to the speed dispersion being high in the abject column - density gas at the surface of the clump, either at localized positions or with bow - alike shapes. Such structure is often found in detailed gamey - resolution speed maps of observed starless cores (e.g., Barranco & Goodman 1998; Goodman et al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et al. 2004). However, it is not predicted or explain within the framework of ace - formation mannequin based on the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated by ambipolar dispersion.
Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular cloud core is formed by turbulent ram pressure compaction. As it gains mass and become denser, both its internal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For some cores, the gravitational attraction may exceed any oppose forces (either thermal or magnetic), and the core goes into collapse to quickly build up | fogm at the stagnation poikts of the flow cyere tie compdession ks at a maximum and the relavive veloxity differences are ag a minimlm. The orugin if coherenrs is nob so dpear, uut we speculatg that it maf be caused by pfolection, because the line-of-sight lengeh of tne matter contrifutimd to nht line profile has a minimum at tge core center, and skall offsets from the centfr tjerefore cause lithle variatiin ig the observea line widuh.
Kolecular dloud cores that harbor protostxrs iu their intgxuor (ds identifixd by nhe presence of sink [articlrs in our modeks) ere xharacterized by haviig $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for jhose objewta our estimates ti $N_{\rm vhr}$ ase luqer lijivs fo the trne value. On the other yand, most of the cotef without centdal obtests in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, ans thus are *not* gravitatuonally bound. This is in agreeient with the observational results of Tachihara at al. (2002) xnd Mjfqtw et al. (2002) for starless cores. However, also some jgstrvvd “starless” cores seem to lir flpfe to or even fall yslkw the equipartitiln line (e.g., Cqselli et al. 2002), snd we speculate that at leqst some of nhem may contain as yec undetected youmg strllar or sub-stellar objzcts, aa is in the case of dure L1014 (Young et au. 2004).
Thv fawt that cores in the gravoeurbulent modzl are ivitislly cweated and conflted by the ram predsure fsom converhent larger-scale flows leads to the velocity civpegsion beiug higmest in the low column-density gas at the rurface of the clnmp, either ae localized pmditions or wmth bow-lihe syapew. Such rgructure is ofyen found in detailwd high-resolution yelockfy maps of obsexree starless corex (e.e., Bwrganro & Gjmdman 1998; Goodmdn eg au. 1998; Caseuli et al.2002; Tcfxlla et al. 2004). However, it is not predicted or explsiked withib the frwmework of stsr-formation models basev on tie sloe cjntraction of magnetically subdritical forcs mediated br amnipojar diffusnon.
Our calculations support an evolutionery sequence where a mooecular cloud core ns formed by vurbulqnt ram psessure compression. Qs it gains mass snd becomes denser, bofh its integnal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy inxrease. For some codes, yhe ggavntacional wttrecvion may exceed amy opposing forces (either thermel or magnatnc), and the core goes into colkaose to quickli build up | form at the stagnation points of the the is at maximum and the a The origin of is not so but we speculate that it may caused by projection, because the line-of-sight length of the matter contributing to the profile has a minimum at the core center, and small offsets from the therefore little in observed line width. Molecular cloud cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identified by the of sink particles in our models) are characterized having $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but those objects our estimates to vir}$ lower limits the value. the other hand, of the cores without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, and thus *not* gravitationally is in with observational of Tachihara et and Morata et al. (2002) for also some observed “starless” cores seem to lie to or fall below the equipartition line (e.g., et al. 2002), and we speculate that at some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects, as is case of core L1014 et al. 2004). fact cores the model are created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger-scale flows to the velocity dispersion being highest in the low column-density the of the clump, at localized positions or bow-like Such structure is often detailed velocity starless (e.g., & Goodman 1998; Goodman al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; et al. 2004). However, explained within the framework of star-formation models based the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores by ambipolar diffusion. Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular core is turbulent ram pressure compression. As it gains mass becomes denser, both its kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational increase. some cores, gravitational attraction may any opposing forces thermal or magnetic), core goes collapse quickly | form at the stagnation points Of the flow wHere tHe cOmpReSsioN is aT a maximum and thE RelaTive velocity differenceS are aT a MInimUM. THe oriGin of coHErENCe iS nOt So cLeAR, bUt we sPecUlate thAt it may be cAusEd By projection, BEcAuse the linE-of-Sight length oF thE matteR cOntRIbutiNg tO the lIne proFIle has A minimum aT tHE core cENter, and SMAlL offSets from the center THeREfore cause littLe variAtIOn IN The ObsErved line wIdTh.
MolECular clOUd COREs tHAt harbor protoStars in theiR IntErior (aS iDenTIfied bY the pReSEncE of sink partIcleS in our modEls) are CHaracteRIzed by hAving $M_{\Rm vIr}<M$, But fOR tHoSe oBjECts OUr EstIMatEs to $M_{\rm vIr}$ ArE loweR limITS TO the TruE valUe. On tHe other hand, moSt oF the COreS withOut ceNtraL oBjectS in our SimulAtIons have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, And tHus are *not* GraViTatIoNally BOund. ThIs iS in AgreemeNt with tHE obSeRVATiOnal results of TachiHaRA Et Al. (2002) and MorAta et aL. (2002) FoR sTArless coReS. HoWeveR, ALso soMe obSErVed “starlEss” corES sEeM to lie cLoSe to or EvEn fAll Below THe eqUipartItion linE (e.g., CaSElli et al. 2002), and we sPEculate that at LEaST SoME of tHem May contain aS yet UNdetEcteD YoUng STellaR or suB-sTElLAr objects, as is in the cAsE of corE L1014 (YouNg et al. 2004).
The fact That cores iN THE gravotuRbulENt MOdel are initialLy creAted and conFIned by thE ram pRessure fRom converGENt larger-ScaLe fLowS leADS tO the velocity dISPersIoN being hIghEst in thE loW coLumN-deNsIty gas at tHe surfacE oF tHe ClUmp, EitheR At localiZeD poSiTioNs or wITh bow-lIke shApes. suCh STruCture is OFtEN FounD iN dEtaiLed HiGh-resOlutIOn vElocity Maps of obsErvED staRlEsS cores (e.G., Barranco & GoodMaN 1998; Goodman et Al. 1998; casElli et AL.2002; tafalla eT al. 2004). However, it is not predicTEd or expLaiNed wiThin The framewOrk Of star-ForMAtion mOdels bAsed oN tHe sLOW contRACtIon Of MagneticalLY SubCritiCaL corEs mediaTed by ambipolar diffUSioN.
Our calculatiOns SuppORT aN evOLuTIonArY SeqUENce where a molecuLar cloud coRe IS fOrmed by turBUleNt Ram presSure comPressIOn. As it gAins mass aNd becomes DeNser, BOTh iTs internal Kinetic eNergy and tHE absoLUtE valuE of Its graViTatIonal Energy INcrEase. FOr some CoRes, the GraviTaTional atTraction may exceed any oppOsing fOrces (EitHer thermaL or MAgnEtic), and thE corE goes into cOllApsE to quIckLY builD up | form at the stagnation po ints of th e flo w w her ethecomp ression is ata max imum and the relativeveloc it y dif f er ences are at am i nim um .The o r ig in of co herence is not so cl ea r, but we sp e cu late thatitmay be cause d b y proj ec tio n , bec aus e the line- o f-sigh t lengthof the ma t ter con t r ib utin g to the line pro f il e has a minimum at th ec or e cen ter , and smal loffse t s fromt he c e nte r therefore ca use littlev ari ationin th e obser ved l in e wi dth.
Molec ular cloud co res th a t harbo r protos tars i n t hei r in t er io r ( as ide n ti fie d by the pre se nc e ofsink p a r ticl esin o ur mo dels) are cha rac teri z edby ha ving$M_{ \r m vir }<M$,but f or those objectsourestimates to $ M_{ \r m vir } $ arelow erlimitsto thet rue v a l u e. On the other hand ,m o st of thecoresw it ho u t centra lobj ects i n our sim u la tions ha ve $ M _ {\ rm vir} > M $, and t hus ar e *no t * gr avitat ionallybound . This is in ag r eement with t h eo b se r vati ona l results o f Ta c hiha ra e t a l.( 2002) andMo r at a et al. (2002) forst arless core s. However, a lso some o b s e rved “st arle s s” cores seem tolie c lose to or even fal l bel ow the e quipartit i o n line ( e.g .,Cas ell i et al. 2002), a n d wesp eculate th at at l eas t s ome of t hem may c ontain a sye tun det ected young st el lar o r s ub-st e llar o bject s, a sis inthe cas e o f core L 10 14 ( You ng et a l. 2 0 04) .
Thefact that co r es i nth e gravo turbulent mod el are initi al lycreate d and conf ined by the ram pressur e from c onv ergen t la rger-scal e f lows l ead s to th e velo citydi spe r s ion b e i ng hi gh est in the l owcolum n- dens ity gas at the surface of the clump, eithe r a t lo c a li zed po s iti on s or w ith bow-like sh apes. Such s t ru cture is o f ten f ound in detail ed hi g h-resol ution vel ocity map sof o b s erv ed starles s cores(e.g., Ba r ranco &Goodm an1998;Go odm an et al. 1 9 98; Case lli et a l.2002 ; Taf al la et al . 2004). However, it is not p redic ted or expla ine d wi thin thefram ework of s tar -fo rmati onm odels bas e dont he sl ow c o ntraction of ma g n et ically subc r i t ica l cor esm ediate d by ambipolar diffus i on.
Our calcu lati o n s s upp o rt a nevolutionary s equ en c e where a m olecular cl oud core i s form ed byturbul ent ram p re s sure c ompr ess ion. As i t g ai n s massan db ecomes den se r, bot h itsi nter n a l kinetic energy andt h e abs o lut e val ue of its grav itationalenergy incr ease.Forsomecores,th e grav ita ti onal attra c tion mayexcee d any o pp osin g f orces(eit h e r the rmal o r m agnetic), a nd th ec ore goe s int ocoll apse to q u ickly bu ild up | form_at the_stagnation points of the_flow where_the_compression is_at_a maximum and_the relative velocity_differences are at a_minimum. The origin_of_coherence is not so clear, but we speculate that it may be caused by_projection,_because the_line-of-sight_length_of the matter contributing to_the line profile has a_minimum at_the core center, and small offsets from the_center_therefore cause little_variation in the observed line width.
Molecular cloud cores that_harbor protostars in their interior (as_identified by the_presence_of_sink particles in our_models) are characterized by having $M_{\rm_vir}<M$, but for those objects our_estimates to $M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits_to the true value. On the_other hand, most of the_cores without_central objects in our simulations_have $ M_{\rm_vir} >_M$, and thus_are *not* gravitationally bound. This is_in agreement with_the observational results of Tachihara et_al. (2002)_and Morata et_al. (2002)_for_starless cores._However, also some_observed_“starless” cores_seem_to lie close to or even_fall_below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et_al. 2002), and we speculate_that_at least some of_them may contain as yet_undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects,_as is_in the_case of core L1014 (Young et al. 2004).
The fact that cores in_the gravoturbulent model are initially created_and confined by the_ram pressure_from_convergent larger-scale flows_leads_to the_velocity dispersion being highest in the low_column-density gas_at the surface of the clump,_either at localized positions_or_with bow-like shapes. Such structure is_often found in detailed high-resolution velocity_maps of observed starless cores_(e.g.,_Barranco_& Goodman 1998; Goodman et_al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et_al. 2004). However, it_is not predicted or explained within the_framework_of star-formation models based on the_slow_contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated_by_ambipolar_diffusion.
Our calculations support an evolutionary_sequence where a molecular cloud core_is formed by turbulent ram pressure compression. As it_gains mass and_becomes denser, both its internal_kinetic_energy_and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For_some cores,_the gravitational attraction_may exceed any opposing forces (either thermal or magnetic), and_the core goes into collapse to quickly_build up |
many-body interactions, where existing methods fail to fully include. Especially, inclusion of temperature-dependent contributions, e.g., lattice vibrational, magnetic and electronic entropy, is straightforward (see Appendix). We note that a complete understanding of the SPE correspondence will require further study, i.e., (i) how bijection-breaking occurs when $D_M$ increases, and (ii) especially for structures in the anharmonic region, thecorrespondence remains unclear. For the latter, we can see from Fig. \[fig:dU\] that several microscopic structures have low anharmonicity but high $dU$, which indicates directly that the SPE correspondence is not unique for such structures. For other structures in the anharmonic state, the correspondence is unclear. Herein, we propose at least a partial set of microscopic structures for which the SPE correspondence is practically guaranteed. As a practical matter, when we predict the PEL from a given structure, we cannot illustrate simply a relationship like those shown in Figs. \[fig:dU\]a, b or Fig. \[fig:q\]b because we do not know the original PEL. Alternatively, we can construct relationships between the anharmonicity $D_M$ and $d_c$ for multiple microscopic structures constructed with finite system size, such as those shown in Fig. \[fig:dm\] or Fig. \[fig:q\]a. From such relationships, we can therefore know *a priori* whether a given structure is in the harmonic or anharmonic region. In the former case, the structure provides $\bm{\Gamma}\left(\beta\right) \simeq \phi_{\textrm{th}}\left(\beta\right)$, which is thus guaranteed to predict the PE inversely, with residual structural uncertainty that corresponds to the anharmonicity $D_M$. Therefore, when the given structure is in the harmonic state, the present results can also be applied to confirm the validity of a constructed PEL by existing methods.
Acknowledgement {#acknowledgement.unnumbered}
===============
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (16K06704) from the MEXT of Japan, Research Grant from Hitachi Metals$\cdot$Materials Science Foundation, and Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). The author expresses cordial thanks to Prof. Shu Kurokawa and Prof. Yoshikazu Tabata at Kyoto University for fruitful | many - body interactions, where existing methods fail to amply admit. Especially, inclusion of temperature - pendent contribution, e.g., lattice vibrational, charismatic and electronic entropy, is straightforward (see Appendix). We notice that a accomplished understanding of the SPE parallelism will require further study, i.e., (one) how bijection - breakage occurs when $ D_M$ increases, and (ii) particularly for structures in the anharmonic region, thecorrespondence stay unclear. For the latter, we can see from Fig. \[fig: dU\ ] that several microscopic structure have low anharmonicity but high $ dU$, which indicates immediately that the SPE correspondence is not singular for such structures. For other structures in the anharmonic department of state, the correspondence is unclear. Herein, we propose at least a partial set of microscopic structures for which the SPE correspondence is practically guaranteed. As a practical matter, when we predict the PEL from a given structure, we cannot illustrate simply a relationship like those read in Figs. \[fig: dU\]a, b or Fig. \[fig: q\]b because we do not know the original PEL. Alternatively, we can construct kinship between the anharmonicity $ D_M$ and $ d_c$ for multiple microscopic structure constructed with finite system size, such as those shown in Fig. \[fig: dm\ ] or Fig. \[fig: q\]a. From such relationship, we can therefore know * a priori * whether a given structure is in the consonant or anharmonic region. In the former case, the structure provides $ \bm{\Gamma}\left(\beta\right) \simeq \phi_{\textrm{th}}\left(\beta\right)$, which is thus guaranteed to predict the PE inversely, with residual structural uncertainty that corresponds to the anharmonicity $ D_M$. Therefore, when the give structure is in the consonant department of state, the present results can also be applied to confirm the validity of a construct PEL by existing methods.
Acknowledgement { # acknowledgement.unnumbered }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
This work was supported by a Grant - in - Aid for Scientific Research (16K06704) from the MEXT of Japan, Research Grant from Hitachi Metals$\cdot$Materials Science Foundation, and Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). The author expresses affable thanks to Prof. Shu Kurokawa and Prof. Yoshikazu Tabata at Kyoto University for fruitful | majy-body interactions, whert existing methods fail vo fullg includd. Especially, inclusion of telpwratuee-dependent contributiuns, e.g., lantice vibeatiibal, magnetmd and electrohlc encripy, is straighjforward (see Appendix). We nmtd chat a complete understanding of the SPE cotrfspondence wilj reatire further study, i.e., (i) how bijection-bdeaking occurs when $C_M$ increases, and (ii) especiwlly for structures in the anharminic eegion, thecofrespondenbz remains uhclear. For the latter, we can sed frok Fig. \[fig:dU\] tyat veveral miccoscoppc structures have lof anharkonicity but hlgh $dN$, whuch indicates directlb that the SPE correfpondence ia not unique for wuxh sttuctuses. Wir uthtr xtducturfs mn the anhadmonic statw, the correspondenct if unclear. Herejn, we [rjpose at least a partial set of microscmpid structures for which rhe SPE correspondencg is practycally guaranteed. As a practical matter, when we psedicv ghe PCL ffim a given structure, we cannot illustrate simplr a rvlationship like bhose shown in Figx. \[flg:cO\]a, b or Fig. \[fig:d\]b becchss we do not know tje origynal PEL. Altergatifely, we can construct relatuonships betceeb the anharmonicitv $D_M$ and $d_c$ yor muktiplr microscopic structurer cohstructed wlth finits system size, sucf ax dhose shown in Fig. \[fig:dm\] or Fig. \[fig:q\]a. Frok such felajionshi[s, we can hherenmre know *a priori* ahethgr a ghven struchure is in the harmonic or anhackonic region. It tve formex case, the structurq provides $\bm{\Gcmma}\left(\yeta\rieht) \simeq \ihi_{\textrm{vh}}\left(\beta\ridht)$, which is djus guarantexd to preqict the PE invdfsely, with resodual strlcuural unceetainty that correxpovss to the anharnonucity $D_M$. Therefpre, whqn tie gidan structure is kn gne hafmonic statc, tfe ptesent results can anso ge applied to confori the vaoidity os a constructrd PEL by existing methmds.
Ecknowkeddement {#acknowledgement.unnumbersd}
===============
This wogk ras supporteq by a Grant-in-Aib for Scientific Research (16K06704) from the MEXV of Japan, Research Grabt from Hitachi Metclx$\cdot$Materiels Scyence Foutdation, and Advanced Low Carbon Technplogy Research and Debelopmant Pgogram of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). The author expressew cordmaj thanks to Prog. Shu Kbrolawa agd Pcoh. Yoshikazu Tabats at Kyoto University for fruithul | many-body interactions, where existing methods fail to Especially, of temperature-dependent e.g., lattice vibrational, straightforward Appendix). We note a complete understanding the SPE correspondence will require further i.e., (i) how bijection-breaking occurs when $D_M$ increases, and (ii) especially for structures the anharmonic region, thecorrespondence remains unclear. For the latter, we can see from \[fig:dU\] several structures low anharmonicity but high $dU$, which indicates directly that the SPE correspondence is not unique for structures. For other structures in the anharmonic state, correspondence is unclear. Herein, propose at least a partial of structures for the correspondence practically guaranteed. As practical matter, when we predict the PEL from a given structure, we cannot illustrate simply a relationship those shown \[fig:dU\]a, b Fig. because do not know PEL. Alternatively, we can construct relationships $D_M$ and $d_c$ for multiple microscopic structures constructed finite system such as those shown in Fig. or Fig. \[fig:q\]a. From such relationships, we can know *a priori* whether a given structure is in the harmonic or anharmonic region. In case, the structure provides \simeq \phi_{\textrm{th}}\left(\beta\right)$, which thus to the inversely, with structural uncertainty that corresponds to the anharmonicity $D_M$. Therefore, when the structure is in the harmonic state, the present results can applied confirm the validity a constructed PEL by methods. {#acknowledgement.unnumbered} =============== This work by Grant-in-Aid (16K06704) the of Japan, Research Grant Hitachi Metals$\cdot$Materials Science Foundation, and Low Carbon Technology Research Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). The author cordial thanks to Prof. Shu Kurokawa and Yoshikazu Tabata at Kyoto University for fruitful | many-body interactions, where Existing meThods FaiL to FuLly iNcluDe. Especially, inCLusiOn of temperature-dependeNt conTrIButiONs, E.g., latTice vibRAtIONal, MaGnEtiC aND eLectrOniC entropY, is straighTfoRwArd (see AppendIX). WE note that a ComPlete understAndIng of tHe sPE COrresPonDence Will reQUire fuRther studY, i.E., (I) how biJEction-bREAkIng oCcurs when $D_M$ increaSEs, ANd (ii) especially For strUcTUrES In tHe aNharmonic rEgIon, thECorrespONdENCE reMAins unclear. FoR the latter, wE Can See froM FIg. \[fIG:dU\] thaT seveRaL MicRoscopic strUctuRes have loW anharMOnicity BUt high $du$, which IndIcaTes dIReCtLy tHaT The spE CorREspOndence iS nOt UniquE for SUCH StruCtuRes. FOr othEr structures iN thE anhARmoNic stAte, thE corReSpondEnce is UncleAr. herein, we propose At leAst a partiAl sEt Of mIcRoscoPIc struCtuRes For whicH the SPE COrrEsPONDeNce is practically guArANTeEd. As a praCtical MAtTeR, When we prEdIct The Pel From a GiveN StRucture, wE cannoT IlLuStrate sImPly a reLaTioNshIp likE ThosE shown In Figs. \[fiG:dU\]a, b OR Fig. \[fig:q\]b becauSE we do not know tHE oRIGiNAl PEl. AlTernatively, We caN ConsTrucT ReLatIOnshiPs betWeEN tHE anharmonicity $D_M$ and $D_c$ For mulTiple Microscopic stRuctures coNSTRucted wiTh fiNItE System size, such As thoSe shown in FIG. \[fig:dm\] or fig. \[fiG:q\]a. From sUch relatiONShips, we cAn tHerEfoRe kNOW *a Priori* whether A GIven StRucture Is iN the harMonIc oR anHarMoNic region. in the forMeR cAsE, tHe sTructURe providEs $\Bm{\GAmMa}\lEft(\beTA\right) \Simeq \Phi_{\tExTrM{Th}}\lEft(\beta\RIgHT)$, WhicH iS tHus gUarAnTeed tO preDIct The PE inVersely, wiTh rESiduAl StRucturaL uncertainty tHaT corresponDs To tHe anhaRMOnicity $D_m$. Therefore, when the given sTRucture Is iN the hArmoNic state, tHe pResent ResULts can Also be AppliEd To cONFirm tHE VaLidItY of a constrUCTed pEL by ExIstiNg methoDs.
Acknowledgement {#aCKnoWledgement.unnUmbEred}
===============
tHIs WorK WaS SupPoRTed BY A Grant-in-Aid for SCientific REsEArCh (16K06704) from the meXT Of japan, ReSearch GRant fROm HitacHi Metals$\cDot$MateriAlS SciENCe FOundation, aNd AdvancEd Low CarbON TechNOlOgy ReSeaRch and deVelOpmenT ProgrAM of The JaPan SciEnCe and TEchnoLoGy Agency (jST). The author expresses coRdial tHanks To PRof. Shu KurOkaWA anD Prof. YoshIkazU Tabata at KYotO UnIversIty FOr fruItfuL | many-body interactions, w here exist ing m eth ods f ailto f ully include.E spec ially, inclusion of te mpera tu r e-de p en dentcontrib u ti o n s,e. g. , l at t ic e vib rat ional,magnetic a ndel ectronic ent r op y, is stra igh tforward (se e A ppendi x) . W e note th at acomple t e unde rstanding o f the S P E corre s p on denc e will require fu r th e r study, i.e., (i) h ow bi j e cti on- breaking o cc urs w h en $D_M $ i n c r eas e s, and (ii) e specially f o r s tructu re s i n the a nharm on i c r egion, thec orre spondence remai n s uncle a r. Forthe la tte r,we c a nse e f ro m Fi g .\[f i g:d U\] that s ev eralmicr o s c o picstr uctu res h ave low anhar mon icit y bu t hig h $dU $, w hi ch in dicate s dir ec tly that the SP E co rresponde nce i s n ot uniq u e forsuc h s tructur es. For oth er s t ru ctures in the anha rm o n ic state,the co r re sp o ndence i sunc lear . Herei n, w e p ropose a t leas t a p artialse t of m ic ros cop ic st r uctu res fo r whichthe S P E corresponden c e is practica l ly g ua r ante ed. As a pract ical matt er,w he n w e pred ict t he PE L from a given struc tu re, we cann ot illustrate simply ar e l ationshi p li k et hose shown inFigs. \[fig:dU\ ] a, b orFig.\[fig:q\ ]b becaus e we do no t k now th e o r i gi nal PEL. Alte r n ativ el y, we c anconstru ctrel ati ons hi ps betwee n the an ha rm on ic ity $D_M $ and $d_ c$ fo rmul tiple micros copic str uc tu r esconstru c te d with f in itesys te m siz e, s u chas thos e shown i n F i g. \ [f ig :dm\] o r Fig. \[fig: q\ ]a. From s uc h r elatio n s hips, we can therefore know *ap riori*whe thera gi ven struc tur e is i n t h e harm onic o r anh ar mon i c regi o n .Inth e former c a s e,the s tr uctu re prov ides $\bm{\Gamma}\ l eft (\beta\right) \s imeq \ ph i_{ \ te x trm {t h }}\ l e ft(\beta\right) $, which i st hu s guarante e d t opredict the PE inve r sely, w ith resid ual struc tu ralu n cer tainty tha t corres ponds tot he an h ar monic ity $D_M$ .The refor e, whe n th e giv en str uc ture i s inth e harmon ic state, the present r esults canals o be appl ied toconfirm t he v alidity of acon struc ted PEL b y ex i st ing metho ds.Acknowled g em ent { #a cknowledgem e n t .un numbe red }
===== ==== ======
This work was supportedby a G ran t-i n -Aid f or ScientificRes ea r c h (16K06 70 4) from the MEXT of J a pan,Resear ch Gra nt from H it a chi Me tals $\c dot$Mater ial sS cienceFo un d ation, and A dvance d LowC arbo n Technology Resea rch a n d Deve l opm ent P ro gram of theJapan Scie nce and Tec hnolog y Ag ency(JST).Th e auth orex presses co r dial than ks to Prof.Sh u Ku rok awa an d Pr o f . Yos hika zu Ta bata at K y o to Un iv e rsi ty f or fr ui tful | many-body_interactions, where_existing methods fail to_fully include._Especially,_inclusion of_temperature-dependent_contributions, e.g., lattice_vibrational, magnetic and_electronic entropy, is straightforward_(see Appendix). We_note_that a complete understanding of the SPE correspondence will require further study, i.e., (i)_how_bijection-breaking occurs_when_$D_M$_increases, and (ii) especially for_structures in the anharmonic region,_thecorrespondence remains_unclear. For the latter, we can see from_Fig. \[fig:dU\]_that several microscopic_structures have low anharmonicity but high $dU$, which indicates_directly that the SPE correspondence is_not unique for_such_structures._For other structures in_the anharmonic state, the correspondence is_unclear. Herein, we propose at least_a partial set of microscopic structures for_which the SPE correspondence is practically_guaranteed. As a practical matter,_when we_predict the PEL from a_given structure, we_cannot illustrate_simply a relationship_like those shown in Figs. \[fig:dU\]a, b_or Fig. \[fig:q\]b because_we do not know the original_PEL._Alternatively, we can_construct_relationships_between the_anharmonicity $D_M$ and_$d_c$_for multiple_microscopic_structures constructed with finite system size,_such_as those shown in Fig. \[fig:dm\] or Fig. \[fig:q\]a._From such relationships, we_can_therefore know *a priori*_whether a given structure is_in the harmonic or anharmonic region._In the_former case,_the structure provides $\bm{\Gamma}\left(\beta\right) \simeq \phi_{\textrm{th}}\left(\beta\right)$, which is thus guaranteed to_predict the PE inversely, with residual_structural uncertainty that corresponds_to the_anharmonicity_$D_M$. Therefore, when_the_given structure_is in the harmonic state, the present_results can_also be applied to confirm the_validity of a constructed_PEL_by existing methods.
Acknowledgement {#acknowledgement.unnumbered}
===============
This work was_supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific_Research (16K06704) from the MEXT_of_Japan,_Research Grant from Hitachi Metals$\cdot$Materials_Science Foundation, and Advanced Low Carbon_Technology Research and_Development Program of the Japan Science and_Technology_Agency (JST). The author expresses cordial_thanks_to Prof. Shu Kurokawa and Prof._Yoshikazu_Tabata_at Kyoto University for fruitful |
13, 222 —–. 2003,, in press (astro-ph/0308330) Walter, F., Weiss, A., & Scoville, N. 2002,, 580, L21 Weaver, R., et al. 1977,, 218, 377 Yamauchi, S., et al. 1990,, 365, 532 Yun, M. S., Ho, P. T. P., & Lo, K. Y. 1994, Nature, 372, 530 Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., & Huchra, J. P. 1994,, 420, 87
---
abstract: 'A [*test space*]{} is the set of outcome-sets associated with a collection of experiments. This notion provides a simple mathematical framework for the study of probabilistic theories – notably, quantum mechanics – in which one is faced with incommensurable random quantities. In the case of quantum mechanics, the relevant test space, the set of orthonormal bases of a Hilbert space, carries significant topological structure. This paper inaugurates a general study of topological test spaces. Among other things, we show that any topological test space with a compact space of outcomes is of finite rank. We also generalize results of Meyer and Clifton-Kent by showing that, under very weak assumptions, any second-countable topological test space contains a dense semi-classical test space.'
---
[Topological Test Spaces]{}[^1]\
Alexander Wilce\
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Susquehanna University\
Selinsgrove, Pa 17870 email: wilce@susqu.edu
[0. Introduction]{}
A [*test space*]{} in the sense of Foulis and Randall \[3, 4, 5\], is a pair $(X,{\frak A})$ where $X$ is a non-empty set and ${\frak A}$ is a covering of $X$ by non-empty subsets. [^2] The intended interpretation is that each set $E \in {\frak A}$ represents an exhaustive set of mutually exclusive possible [*outcomes*]{}, as of some experiment, decision, physical process, or [*test*]{}. A [*state*]{}, or [*probability weight*]{}, on $(X,{\frak A})$ is a mapping $\omega : X \rightarrow [0,1]$ summing to $1$ over each test.
Obviously, this framework subsumes discrete classical probability theory, which deals with test spaces $(E | 13, 222 — –. 2003, , in press (astro - ph/0308330) Walter, F., Weiss, A., & Scoville, N. 2002, , 580, L21 Weaver, R., et al. 1977, , 218, 377 Yamauchi, S., et al. 1990, , 365, 532 Yun, M. S., Ho, P. T. P., & Lo, K. Y. 1994, Nature, 372, 530 Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., & Huchra, J. P. 1994, , 420, 87
---
abstract:' A [ * test space * ] { } is the set of outcome - set consociate with a collection of experiments. This notion provide a simple mathematical model for the study of probabilistic theories – notably, quantum mechanics – in which one is face with incommensurable random quantities. In the case of quantum automobile mechanic, the relevant test space, the hardening of orthonormal bases of a Hilbert space, carries significant topological structure. This composition inaugurates a general study of topological examination spaces. Among other things, we show that any topological trial space with a compact space of outcomes is of finite rank. We also popularize results of Meyer and Clifton - Kent by showing that, under very weak assumptions, any second - countable topological test space contain a dense semi - authoritative test space.'
---
[ Topological Test Spaces]{}[^1]\
Alexander Wilce\
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Susquehanna University\
Selinsgrove, Pa 17870 email: wilce@susqu.edu
[ 0. Introduction ] { }
A [ * test space * ] { } in the sense of Foulis and Randall \[3, 4, 5\ ], is a pair $ (X,{\frak A})$ where $ X$ is a non - empty hardening and $ { \frak A}$ is a cover of $ X$ by non - empty subsets. [ ^2 ] The intended rendition is that each rig $ east \in { \frak A}$ represents an exhaustive set of mutually exclusive possible [ * outcomes * ] { }, as of some experiment, decision, physical procedure, or [ * test * ] { }. A [ * state * ] { }, or [ * probability weight * ] { }, on $ (X,{\frak A})$ is a mapping $ \omega: X \rightarrow [ 0,1]$ summing to $ 1 $ over each test.
Obviously, this model subsumes discrete classical probability theory, which deals with test spaces $ (E | 13, 222 —–. 2003,, in press (astro-ph/0308330) Waltev, F., Weiss, A., & Scorulle, N. 2002,, 580, L21 Wsaver, R., dt al. 1977,, 218, 377 Yamauchi, S., et al. 1990,, 365, 532 Yyn, M. W., Ho, P. T. P., & Lo, K. Y. 1994, Nagure, 372, 530 Zagitsky, D., Jennmcutt, R. C. Jr., & Hurgra, J. P. 1994,, 420, 87
---
ababract: 'E [*test space*]{} is the set ox outcome-sets dsroeiated with a collection of experimegts. Thix jotion providef a xympls mathematical framework for the sfudy of probabilistiv theories – notably, quantul mefhanics – in which lne is facee wiey incommensufable random quantitiea. In the case of quantum mechankcs, tke relevant twst vpace, the sxt of jrthonormal nsses ox a Hilnert space, carvies vigbificant topological vtructure. This papgr inaugurdtzs a general study of tipolocican terr soacts. Emohg othfr vhings, we sgow that ant topological test xpwbr with a comlact s[ase of outcomes is of finite rank. We alsm gsneralize results of Meter and Clifton-Kent bi showing ehat, under very weak assumptions, any second-countatle tkooliglcal redt space contains a dense semi-classical test flave.'
---
[Nopological Test Fpaces]{}[^1]\
Alexamdfr Rilce\
Departmevt of Matgematical Sciences, Susqueranna Universiuy\
Selonsgrove, Pa 17870 email: wilce@suswu.edu
[0. Introdlctiin]{}
A [*test space*]{} in che sense of Foukis amd Randall \[3, 4, 5\], is a pair $(X,{\frzk A})$ where $D$ is a noh-dmpty set and ${\frxk S}$ hs a covtfing of $X$ by non-eipty subsxts. [^2] Che intevded inter[retation ls that each set $E \in {\frwk A}$ tepresants an exjaustive set of mutually exclusmte possible [*ootcmmev*]{}, as of fome cxperiment, decifion, physical krocess, ox [*test*]{}. A [*state*]{}, og [*probabinity weight*]{}, on $(X,{\frak A})$ iv a mapping $\okega : X \wighrarriw [0,1]$ sumokng to $1$ over esch test.
Oyriously, tyis framework subsmmes ajscrete classiccu probability throrh, wribh veals fith test spdces $(E | 13, 222 —–. 2003,, in press (astro-ph/0308330) Weiss, & Scoville, 2002,, 580, L21 218, Yamauchi, S., et 1990,, 365, 532 M. S., Ho, P. T. P., Lo, K. Y. 1994, Nature, 372, 530 Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., Huchra, J. P. 1994,, 420, 87 --- abstract: 'A [*test space*]{} is the of associated a of experiments. This notion provides a simple mathematical framework for the study of probabilistic theories – quantum mechanics – in which one is faced incommensurable random quantities. In case of quantum mechanics, the test the set orthonormal of Hilbert space, carries topological structure. This paper inaugurates a general study of topological test spaces. Among other things, we show any topological with a space outcomes of finite rank. generalize results of Meyer and Clifton-Kent under very weak assumptions, any second-countable topological test contains a semi-classical test space.' --- [Topological Test Alexander Wilce\ Department of Mathematical Sciences, Susquehanna University\ Pa 17870 email: wilce@susqu.edu [0. Introduction]{} A [*test space*]{} in the sense of Foulis and 4, 5\], is a $(X,{\frak A})$ where is non-empty and A}$ is covering of $X$ by non-empty subsets. [^2] The intended interpretation is each set $E \in {\frak A}$ represents an exhaustive set exclusive [*outcomes*]{}, as of experiment, decision, physical process, [*test*]{}. [*state*]{}, or [*probability weight*]{}, A})$ a X [0,1]$ to $1$ over each Obviously, this framework subsumes discrete probability theory, which deals | 13, 222 —–. 2003,, in press (astro-ph/0308330) Walter, F., WeisS, A., & Scoville, n. 2002,, 580, L21 WeaVer, r., et Al. 1977,, 218, 377 yamaUchi, s., et al. 1990,, 365, 532 Yun, M. S., Ho, P. T. p., & lo, K. Y. 1994, nature, 372, 530 Zaritsky, D., KennicuTt, R. C. JR., & HUChra, j. p. 1994,, 420, 87
---
aBstraCt: 'A [*test SPaCE*]{} Is tHe SeT of OuTCoMe-setS asSociateD with a collEctIoN of experimenTS. THis notion pRovIdes a simple mAthEmaticAl FraMEwork For The stUdy of pRObabilIstic theoRiES – notabLY, quantuM MEcHaniCs – in which one is facED wITh incommensuraBle ranDoM QuANTitIes. in the case oF qUantuM MechaniCS, tHE REleVAnt test space, tHe set of orthONorMal basEs Of a hIlbert Space, CaRRieS significanT topOlogical sTructuRE. This paPEr inaugUrates A geNerAl stUDy Of TopOlOGicAL tEst SPacEs. Among oThEr ThingS, we sHOW THat aNy tOpolOgicaL test space witH a cOmpaCT spAce of OutcoMes iS oF finiTe rank. we alsO gEneralize resultS of MEyer and ClIftOn-kenT bY showINg that, UndEr vEry weak AssumptIOns, AnY SECoNd-countable topologIcAL TeSt space cOntainS A dEnSE semi-claSsIcaL tesT SPace.'
---
[TOpolOGiCal Test SPaces]{}[^1]\
ALExAnDer WilcE\
DEpartmEnT of matHematICal SCienceS, SusquehAnna UNIversity\
SelinsGRove, Pa 17870 email: wiLCe@SUSqU.Edu
[0. INtrOduction]{}
A [*teSt spACe*]{} in The sENsE of fOulis And RaNdALl \[3, 4, 5\], IS a pair $(X,{\frak A})$ where $X$ iS a Non-empTy set And ${\frak A}$ is a coVering of $X$ bY NON-empty suBsetS. [^2] thE Intended interpRetatIon is that eACh set $E \in {\Frak A}$ RepresenTs an exhauSTIve set of MutUalLy eXclUSIvE possible [*outcOMEs*]{}, as Of Some expEriMent, decIsiOn, pHysIcaL pRocess, or [*tEst*]{}. A [*statE*]{}, oR [*pRoBaBilIty weIGht*]{}, on $(X,{\frAk a})$ is A mAppIng $\omEGa : X \rigHtarrOw [0,1]$ suMmInG To $1$ oVer each TEsT.
oBvioUsLy, This FraMeWork sUbsuMEs dIscrete Classical ProBAbilItY tHeory, whIch deals with tEsT spaces $(E | 13, 222 —–. 2003,, in pre ss (astro- ph/03 083 30) W alte r, F ., Weiss, A.,& Sco ville, N. 2002,, 580,L21 W ea v er,R ., et a l. 1977 , ,2 1 8,37 7Yam au c hi , S., et al. 19 90,, 365,532 Y un, M. S., H o ,P. T. P.,& L o, K. Y. 199 4,Nature ,372 , 530Zar itsky , D.,K ennicu tt, R. C. J r ., & H u chra, J . P. 199 4,, 420, 87
---a bs t ract: 'A [*tes t spac e* ] {} i s t heset of out co me-se t s assoc i at e d wit h a collection of experim e nts . This n oti o n prov idesas imp le mathemat ical framewor k fort he stud y of pro babili sti c t heor i es – no ta b ly, qu ant u m m echanics – i n whi ch o n e i s fa ced wit h inc ommensurableran domq uan titie s. In the c ase o f quan tum m ec hanics, the rel evan t test sp ace ,the s et of orthon orm albases o f a Hil b ert s p a c e, carries significa nt t op ological struc t ur e. This pap er in augu r a tes a gen e ra l studyof top o lo gi cal tes tspaces .Amo ngother thin gs, we show th at an y topological t e st space with ac o mp a ct s pac e of outcom es i s offini t eran k . Wealsoge n er a lize results of Mey er and C lifto n-Kent by sho wing that, u n der very wea k a s sumptions, any seco nd-countab l e topolo gical test sp ace conta i n s a dens e s emi -cl ass i c al test space.' - --
[T opologi cal Test S pac es] {}[ ^1] \Alexander Wilce\De pa rt me ntof Ma t hematica lSci en ces , Sus q uehann a Uni vers it y\ Sel insgrov e ,P a 178 70 emai l:wi lce@s usqu . edu
[0. I ntroducti on] { }
A [ *t est spa ce*]{} in the s ense of Fo ul isand Ra n d all \[3, 4, 5\], is a pair $(X, { \frak A })$ wher e $X $ is a no n-e mpty s eta nd ${\ frak A }$ is a co v e ringo f $ X$by non-empty s ubs ets.[^ 2] T he inte nded interpretatio n is that each se t $ E \i n {\ fra k A } $ r ep r ese n t s an exhaustive set of mu tu a ll y exclusiv e po ss ible [* outcome s*]{} , as ofsome expe riment, d ec isio n , ph ysical pro cess, or [*test*] { }. A[ *s tate* ]{} , or [ *p rob abili ty wei g ht* ]{},on $(X ,{ \frakA})$is a mappi ng $\omega : X \rightar row [0 ,1]$sum ming to $ 1$o ver each tes t.
Obviously, th isframe wor k subs umes di scr e te cl assi c al probab i li tyt h eo ry, which d e a l s w ith t est spaces $(E | 13,_222 —–._2003,, in press (astro-ph/0308330)_Walter, F.,_Weiss,_A., &_Scoville,_N. 2002,, 580,_L21 Weaver, R.,_et al. 1977,, 218,_377 Yamauchi, S.,_et_al. 1990,, 365, 532 Yun, M. S., Ho, P. T. P., & Lo, K._Y._1994, Nature,_372,_530_Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C._Jr., & Huchra, J. P._1994,, 420,_87
---
abstract: 'A [*test space*]{} is the set_of_outcome-sets associated with_a collection of experiments. This notion provides a simple_mathematical framework for the study of_probabilistic theories –_notably,_quantum_mechanics – in which_one is faced with incommensurable random_quantities. In the case of quantum_mechanics, the relevant test space, the set_of orthonormal bases of a Hilbert_space, carries significant topological structure._This paper_inaugurates a general study of_topological test spaces._Among other_things, we show_that any topological test space with_a compact space_of outcomes is of finite rank._We_also generalize results_of_Meyer_and Clifton-Kent_by showing that,_under_very weak_assumptions,_any second-countable topological test space contains_a_dense semi-classical test space.'
---
[Topological Test Spaces]{}[^1]\
Alexander Wilce\
Department_of Mathematical Sciences, Susquehanna_University\
Selinsgrove,_Pa 17870 email: wilce@susqu.edu
[0._Introduction]{}
A [*test space*]{} in the_sense of Foulis and Randall \[3,_4, 5\],_is a_pair $(X,{\frak A})$ where $X$ is a non-empty set and ${\frak_A}$ is a covering of $X$_by non-empty subsets. [^2]_The intended_interpretation_is that each_set_$E \in_{\frak A}$ represents an exhaustive set of_mutually exclusive_possible [*outcomes*]{}, as of some experiment,_decision, physical process, or_[*test*]{}._A [*state*]{}, or [*probability weight*]{}, on_$(X,{\frak A})$ is a mapping $\omega_: X \rightarrow [0,1]$ summing_to_$1$_over each test.
Obviously, this framework_subsumes discrete classical probability theory, which_deals with test_spaces $(E |
;q)$ subspace design is a collection $\mathcal{B}$ of $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space $V$ with the property that every $t$-dimensional subspace of $V$ is contained in exactly $\lambda$ of the members of $\mathcal{B}$. Explicit constructions of subspace designs have proved so far to be more elusive than their classical counterparts. Early papers by Thomas, Suzuki, and Itoh have provided some examples of infinite families of subspace designs [@thomas; @suzuki2design92; @itoh], while in [@largesets] an approach to the problem using [*large sets*]{} is given. A $q$-analogue of the Assmus-Mattson theorem gives a general construction of subspace designs from coding theory [@byrne2019assmus]. Further sporadic examples have been found by assuming a prescribed automorphism group of the subspace design [@braun2018q]. For the special case $\lambda=1$ we call such a design a $q$-Steiner system and write $S(t,k,n;q)$. The actual existence of an $S(t,k,n;q)$ Steiner system for $t>1$, was established for the first time when $S(2,3,13;2)$ designs were discovered by Braun *et al* [@qSteiner_exists_2016]. No other examples have been found to date. The smallest open case is that of the $S(2,3,7;q)$ Steiner system, also known as the $q$-analogue of the Fano plane.
While subspace designs have been intensively studied over the last decade [@braun2018q], $q$-analogues of matroids were only considered recently [@JP18; @gorla2019rank]. In fact, the $q$-matroid defined in [@JP18] was a re-discovery of a combinatorial object already studied by Crapo [@crapo1964theory]. Classical matroids are a generalisation of several ideas in combinatorics, such as independence in vector spaces and trees in graph theory. One of the important properties of matroids is that there are equivalent, yet seemingly different ways to define them: in terms of their independent sets, flats, circuits, bases, closure operator and rank function. We call these equivalent definitions *cryptomorphisms*. Up to this day, the only known cryptomorphisms for $q$-matroids are those | ; q)$ subspace design is a collection $ \mathcal{B}$ of $ k$-dimensional subspaces of an $ n$-dimensional vector space $ V$ with the place that every $ t$-dimensional subspace of $ V$ is control in exactly $ \lambda$ of the members of $ \mathcal{B}$. denotative constructions of subspace design have proved indeed far to be more baffling than their classical counterparts. Early papers by Thomas, Suzuki, and Itoh have provided some examples of countless families of subspace designs [ @thomas; @suzuki2design92; @itoh ], while in [ @largesets ] an approach to the problem use [ * large set * ] { } is given. A $ q$-analogue of the Assmus - Mattson theorem gives a cosmopolitan construction of subspace designs from coding hypothesis [ @byrne2019assmus ]. Further sporadic examples have been found by assuming a prescribed automorphism group of the subspace blueprint [ @braun2018q ]. For the special case $ \lambda=1 $ we call such a design a $ q$-Steiner system and spell $ S(t, k, n;q)$. The actual existence of an $ S(t, k, n;q)$ Steiner system for $ t>1 $, was established for the first time when $ S(2,3,13;2)$ designs were discovered by Braun * et al * [ @qSteiner_exists_2016 ]. No other examples have been found to date. The smallest open case is that of the $ S(2,3,7;q)$ Steiner system, also known as the $ q$-analogue of the Fano plane.
While subspace design have been intensively studied over the last ten [ @braun2018q ], $ q$-analogues of matroids were merely view recently [ @JP18; @gorla2019rank ]. In fact, the $ q$-matroid defined in [ @JP18 ] was a re - discovery of a combinative object already analyze by Crapo [ @crapo1964theory ]. Classical matroids are a generalisation of respective ideas in combinatorics, such as independence in vector spaces and trees in graph theory. One of the important properties of matroids is that there be equivalent, yet seemingly different ways to define them: in terms of their independent set, flats, circuits, bases, closure operator and membership function. We call these equivalent definitions * cryptomorphisms *. Up to this sidereal day, the only know cryptomorphisms for $ q$-matroids are those | ;q)$ skbspace design is a colltction $\mathcal{B}$ oy $k$-dimeisional subspacds of an $n$-dimensional vector space $C$ with the property thxt every $n$-dimensiobal wybspace of $V$ is cokcaines in zxectly $\lambda$ of the membess of $\mathcal{B}$. Ebppicit constructions of subspace desygns hafe proved so far to nq modv tlusive than their classical counferpartv. Early paperx by Thomas, Suzuki, and Itoj hage provided some edamples of unfigute families of subspabz designs [@tgomas; @suzuki2design92; @itoh], while iv [@laryesets] an ak'eoafv to the priblem using [*large sets*]{} is given. S $q$-analogue of thx Aswmus-Mattson theorem gmves a general consttuction of sbbspace designs from xoeing jheorf [@byfbe2019arsmhs]. Fhrther spkradic exajples have veen found by assumond a prescribed automjr[hism group of the subspace design [@braut2018q]. Ror the special case $\lanbda=1$ we call such a dgsign a $q$-Seeiner system and write $S(t,k,n;q)$. The actual existenca of en $S(t,j,n;z)$ Wtfiner system for $t>1$, was established for the fiwat tpme when $S(2,3,13;2)$ designf were discpvfrrq by Braun *et al* [@qStzjnsr_exists_2016]. No other fxamplef havw been fotnd yo date. The smallest open cqse is that jd the $S(2,3,7;q)$ Steiner svstem, also kuown ax the $q$-analogue of the Fano 'lane.
Wgile subspafe designa have been intenrivvly vtudied over the last decaqe [@braun2018q], $q$-anclogues uf mstroidf were onlj considered recently [@JP18; @gorlc2019rank]. In fact, tje $q$-matroid defined in [@JP18] was a re-discovery og d cmmbinatoxial onject already seudied by Crapp [@crapo1964tkeory]. Zlassical jatroidv are a genqralisation ox several idees in comfinarorixs, such xs independencr in vector spaces qnd trees in graph thgody. One of the inpotrant propertiex ow mwtgoivs is dhat there ase eduixslent, yet setiikglh digferent ways to defite tgem: in terms of thriv indepeneent setf, flats, circuots, bases, closure lperavor anv rank fugction. We call these equivalenf definitlonf *cryptomorprismw*. Up to this day, the only known cryptomorphisms for $q$-matroids are thowe | ;q)$ subspace design is a collection $\mathcal{B}$ subspaces an $n$-dimensional space $V$ with subspace $V$ is contained exactly $\lambda$ of members of $\mathcal{B}$. Explicit constructions of designs have proved so far to be more elusive than their classical counterparts. papers by Thomas, Suzuki, and Itoh have provided some examples of infinite families subspace [@thomas; @itoh], in [@largesets] an approach to the problem using [*large sets*]{} is given. A $q$-analogue of the theorem gives a general construction of subspace designs coding theory [@byrne2019assmus]. Further examples have been found by a automorphism group the design For the special $\lambda=1$ we call such a design a $q$-Steiner system and write $S(t,k,n;q)$. The actual existence of an Steiner system was established the time $S(2,3,13;2)$ designs were Braun *et al* [@qSteiner_exists_2016]. No other found to date. The smallest open case is of the Steiner system, also known as the of the Fano plane. While subspace designs have intensively studied over the last decade [@braun2018q], $q$-analogues of matroids were only considered recently [@JP18; fact, the $q$-matroid defined [@JP18] was a of combinatorial already by Crapo Classical matroids are a generalisation of several ideas in combinatorics, such independence in vector spaces and trees in graph theory. One important of matroids is there are equivalent, yet different to define them: in their sets, closure and function. We call these definitions *cryptomorphisms*. Up to this the only known cryptomorphisms | ;q)$ subspace design is a collectIon $\mathcal{b}$ of $k$-dImeNsiOnAl suBspaCes of an $n$-dimensIOnal Vector space $V$ with the proPerty ThAT eveRY $t$-DimenSional sUBsPACe oF $V$ Is ConTaINeD in exActLy $\lambdA$ of the membErs Of $\Mathcal{B}$. ExplICiT constructIonS of subspace dEsiGns havE pRovED so faR to Be morE elusiVE than tHeir classIcAL countERparts. EARLy PapeRs by Thomas, Suzuki, aND ITOh have provided Some exAmPLeS OF inFinIte familieS oF subsPAce desiGNs [@THOMas; @SUzuki2design92; @itOh], while in [@laRGesEts] an aPpRoaCH to the ProblEm USinG [*large sets*]{} iS givEn. A $q$-analoGue of tHE Assmus-mAttson tHeorem GivEs a GeneRAl CoNstRuCTioN Of SubSPacE designs FrOm CodinG theORY [@BYrne2019AssMus]. FUrtheR sporadic examPleS havE BeeN founD by asSumiNg A presCribed AutomOrPhism group of the SubsPace desigN [@brAuN2018q]. FOr The spECial caSe $\lAmbDa=1$ we calL such a dESigN a $Q$-sTEiNer system and write $S(T,k,N;Q)$. thE actual eXistenCE oF aN $s(t,k,n;q)$ SteInEr sYsteM FOr $t>1$, waS estABlIshed for The firST tImE when $S(2,3,13;2)$ dEsIgns weRe DisCovEred bY brauN *et al* [@qsteiner_eXists_2016]. nO other examples HAve been found tO DaTE. thE SmalLesT open case is That OF the $s(2,3,7;q)$ StEInEr sYStem, aLso knOwN As THe $q$-analogue of the FanO pLane.
WhIle suBspace designs Have been inTENSively stUdieD OvER the last decade [@Braun2018Q], $q$-analogueS Of matroiDs werE only conSidered reCENtly [@JP18; @goRla2019RanK]. In FacT, THe $Q$-matroid definED In [@JP18] WaS a re-disCovEry of a cOmbInaTorIal ObJect alreaDy studieD bY CRaPo [@CraPo1964theORy]. ClassiCaL maTrOidS are a GEneralIsatiOn of SeVeRAl iDeas in cOMbINAtorIcS, sUch aS inDePendeNce iN VecTor spacEs and treeS in GRaph ThEoRy. One of The important pRoPerties of mAtRoiDs is thAT There are Equivalent, yet seemingly dIFferent WayS to deFine Them: in terMs oF their IndEPendenT sets, fLats, cIrCuiTS, Bases, CLOsUre OpErator and rANK fuNctioN. WE calL these eQuivalent definitioNS *crYptomorphisms*. up tO thiS DAy, The ONlY KnoWn CRypTOMorphisms for $q$-maTroids are tHoSE | ;q)$ subspace design is acollection $\ma thc al{ B} $ of $k$ -dimensional s u bspa ces of an $n$-dimensio nal v ec t or s p ac e $V$ with t h ep r ope rt ytha te ve ry $t $-d imensio nal subspa ceof $V$ is cont a in ed in exac tly $\lambda$ o f t he mem be rso f $\m ath cal{B }$. Ex p licitconstruct io n s of s u bspaced e si gnshave proved so fa r t o be more elusi ve tha nt he i r cl ass ical count er parts . Earlyp ap e r s by Thomas, Suzuk i, and Itoh hav e prov id eds ome ex ample so f i nfinite fam ilie s of subs pace d e signs [ @ thomas; @suzu ki2 des ign9 2 ;@i toh ], whi l ein[ @la rgesets] a nappro acht o t he p rob lemusing [*large sets *]{ } is giv en. A $q$- anal og ue of the A ssmus -M attson theoremgive s a gener alco nst ru ction of sub spa cedesigns from c o din gt h e or y [@byrne2019assmu s] . Fu rther sp oradic ex am p les have b een fou n d by a ssum i ng a presc ribeda ut om orphism g roup o fthe su bspac e des ign [@ braun201 8q].F or the special case $\lambda = 1$ w ec allsuc h a designa $q $ -Ste iner sy ste m andwrite $ S (t , k,n;q)$. The actual e xisten ce of an $S(t,k,n; q)$ Steine r s ystem fo r $t > 1$ , was establish ed fo r the firs t time wh en $S (2,3,13; 2)$ desig n s were di sco ver edbyB r au n *et al* [@q S t eine r_ exists_ 201 6]. Nooth erexa mpl es have bee n foundto d at e. Th e sma l lest ope ncas eisthato f the$S(2, 3,7; q) $S tei ner sys t em , also k no wn a s t he $q$- anal o gue of the Fano pla ne.
Whi le s ubspace designs have b een intens iv ely studi e d over th e last decade [@braun20 1 8q], $q $-a nalog uesof matroi dswere o nly consid ered r ecent ly [@ J P 18; @ g o rl a20 19 rank]. Inf a ct, the$q $-ma troid d efined in [@JP18]w asa re-discover y o f ac o mb ina t or i alob j ect a lready studiedby Crapo [ @c r ap o1964theor y ].Cl assical matroi ds ar e a gene ralisatio n of seve ra l id e a s i n combinat orics, s uch as in d epend e nc e invec tor sp ac esand t rees i n gr aph t heory. O ne ofthe i mp ortant p roperties of matroids i s that ther e a re equiva len t , y et seemin glydifferentway s t o def ine them: int er mso f the ir i n dependent se ts, f la ts, circuit s , bas es, c los u re ope rato r and rank functi o n. We call the se e q u iva len t def in itions *crypto mor ph i s ms*. Upto this day,the only k n own c ryptom orphis ms for$ q $- m atroid s ar e t hose | ;q)$ subspace_design is_a collection $\mathcal{B}$ of_$k$-dimensional subspaces_of_an $n$-dimensional_vector_space $V$ with_the property that_every $t$-dimensional subspace of_$V$ is contained_in_exactly $\lambda$ of the members of $\mathcal{B}$. Explicit constructions of subspace designs have proved_so_far to_be_more_elusive than their classical counterparts._Early papers by Thomas, Suzuki,_and Itoh_have provided some examples of infinite families of_subspace_designs [@thomas; @suzuki2design92;_@itoh], while in [@largesets] an approach to the problem_using [*large sets*]{} is given. A_$q$-analogue of the_Assmus-Mattson_theorem_gives a general construction_of subspace designs from coding theory_[@byrne2019assmus]. Further sporadic examples have been_found by assuming a prescribed automorphism group_of the subspace design [@braun2018q]. For_the special case $\lambda=1$ we_call such_a design a $q$-Steiner system_and write $S(t,k,n;q)$._The actual_existence of an_$S(t,k,n;q)$ Steiner system for $t>1$, was_established for the_first time when $S(2,3,13;2)$ designs were_discovered_by Braun *et_al* [@qSteiner_exists_2016]._No_other examples_have been found_to_date. The_smallest_open case is that of the_$S(2,3,7;q)$_Steiner system, also known as the $q$-analogue_of the Fano plane.
While_subspace_designs have been intensively_studied over the last decade_[@braun2018q], $q$-analogues of matroids were only_considered recently_[@JP18; @gorla2019rank]._In fact, the $q$-matroid defined in [@JP18] was a re-discovery of_a combinatorial object already studied by_Crapo [@crapo1964theory]. Classical matroids are_a generalisation_of_several ideas in_combinatorics,_such as_independence in vector spaces and trees in_graph theory._One of the important properties of_matroids is that there_are_equivalent, yet seemingly different ways to_define them: in terms of their_independent sets, flats, circuits, bases,_closure_operator_and rank function. We call_these equivalent definitions *cryptomorphisms*. Up to_this day, the_only known cryptomorphisms for $q$-matroids are those |
(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})|_{\widetilde{g}_r}\\&\geq b(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}},\end{aligned}$$ where $\tau$ is defined by $\frac{1}{2}(s+t)+(t-s)\tau=r$, so that $\tau\in[-\frac{1}{2},0]$. Combining estimates gives $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{B(y,r,\sqrt{t-r})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}(z)&\leq\dfrac{C^{*}e^{C^{*}}(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x,r,\sqrt{t-r})|_{r}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right)\\&\leq b^{-1}C^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right).\end{aligned}$$ Now integrating from $r=s$ to $r=\frac{1}{2}(t+s)$ gives $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}(t-s)\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\bar{C}(t-s)}\right),$$ so we use the on-diagonal upper bound to conclude that $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K^{2}(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\dfrac{\overline{C}}{(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}-1}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\overline{C}(t-s)}\right).$$ In terms of the rescaled flow, this is $$\int_{\widehat{Q}^{+}(y,-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})}\widehat{K}^{2}(x,1/2;z,r)d\widehat{g}_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}\ | ( t - s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})|_{\widetilde{g}_r}\\&\geq b(t - s)^{\frac{n}{2}},\end{aligned}$$ where $ \tau$ is defined by $ \frac{1}{2}(s+t)+(t - s)\tau = r$, so that $ \tau\in[-\frac{1}{2},0]$. Combining estimates gives $ $ \begin{aligned }
\int_{B(y, r,\sqrt{t - r})}K(x, t;z, r)dg_{r}(z)&\leq\dfrac{C^{*}e^{C^{*}}(t - s)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x, r,\sqrt{t - r})|_{r}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x, y)}{32B^{2}(t - s)}\right)\\&\leq b^{-1}C^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x, y)}{32B^{2}(t - s)}\right).\end{aligned}$$ nowadays integrate from $ r = s$ to $ r=\frac{1}{2}(t+s)$ gives $ $ \int_{Q^{+}(y, s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t - s)})}K(x, t;z, r)dg_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}(t - s)\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x, y)}{\bar{C}(t - s)}\right),$$ so we practice the on - diagonal upper bound to conclude that $ $ \int_{Q^{+}(y, s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t - s)})}K^{2}(x, t;z, r)dg_{r}dr\leq\dfrac{\overline{C}}{(t - s)^{\frac{n}{2}-1}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x, y)}{\overline{C}(t - s)}\right).$$ In condition of the rescaled flow, this is $ $ \int_{\widehat{Q}^{+}(y,-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})}\widehat{K}^{2}(x,1/2;z, r)d\widehat{g}_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}\ | (t-s)^{\fgac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})|_{\didetilde{g}_r}\\&\geq y(r-s)^{\frac{i}{2}},\end{alifned}$$ whefe $\tau$ is defined by $\frac{1}{2}(s+t)+(t-d)\tqu=r$, si that $\tau\in[-\frac{1}{2},0]$. Combiving estilates gices $$\uegin{aligned}
\int_{B(b,d,\sqrt{t-r})}K(x,t;z,r)df_{v}(z)&\leq\bfcac{C^{*}e^{C^{*}}(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x,t,\sqrt{t-r})|_{r}}\exp\laft(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-v)}\rkgkt)\\&\leq b^{-1}C^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right).\enq{alignec}$$ Jow integratind frpi $r=s$ no $r=\frac{1}{2}(t+s)$ gives $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(f-s)})}K(x,t;z,r)vg_{r}dr\leq\overlinr{C}(t-s)\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\bar{C}(t-s)}\gighh),$$ so we use the on-fiagonal upksr fiund to concuude that $$\put_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frzc{1}{2}(t-s)})}K^{2}(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\dfrac{\overline{C}}{(g-s)^{\frae{n}{2}-1}}\exp\left(-\dftcx{d_{s}^{2}(d,i)}{\overline{C}(t-s)}\cight).$$ Pn terms of tmv rescaned floe, this is $$\int_{\wldehav{Q}^{+}(y,-\feac{1}{2},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})}\widehat{K}^{2}(x,1/2;z,c)d\widehat{g}_{r}dr\leq\overjine{C}\ | (t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})|_{\widetilde{g}_r}\\&\geq b(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}},\end{aligned}$$ where $\tau$ is defined by that Combining estimates $$\begin{aligned} \int_{B(y,r,\sqrt{t-r})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}(z)&\leq\dfrac{C^{*}e^{C^{*}}(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x,r,\sqrt{t-r})|_{r}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right)\\&\leq b^{-1}C^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right).\end{aligned}$$ $r=\frac{1}{2}(t+s)$ $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}(t-s)\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\bar{C}(t-s)}\right),$$ so we the on-diagonal upper to conclude that $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K^{2}(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\dfrac{\overline{C}}{(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}-1}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\overline{C}(t-s)}\right).$$ In terms the rescaled flow, this is $$\int_{\widehat{Q}^{+}(y,-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})}\widehat{K}^{2}(x,1/2;z,r)d\widehat{g}_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}\ | (t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqRt{2}})|_{\widetildE{g}_r}\\&\geQ b(t-S)^{\frAc{N}{2}},\end{AligNed}$$ where $\tau$ is dEFineD by $\frac{1}{2}(s+t)+(t-s)\tau=r$, so that $\tAu\in[-\fRaC{1}{2},0]$. combINiNg estImates gIVeS $$\BEgiN{aLiGneD}
\iNT_{B(Y,r,\sqrT{t-r})}k(x,t;z,r)dg_{R}(z)&\leq\dfrac{c^{*}e^{C^{*}}(T-s)^{\Frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x,r,\sqrt{T-R})|_{r}}\Exp\left(-\dfrAc{d_{S}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right)\\&\lEq b^{-1}c^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\LeFt(-\dFRac{d_{s}^{2}(X,y)}{32B^{2}(T-s)}\rigHt).\end{aLIgned}$$ NOw integraTiNG from $r=S$ To $r=\frac{1}{2}(T+S)$ GiVes $$\iNt_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K(x,T;Z,r)DG_{r}dr\leq\overlinE{C}(t-s)\exP\lEFt(-\DFRac{D_{s}^{2}(x,Y)}{\bar{C}(t-s)}\rigHt),$$ So we uSE the on-dIAgONAL upPEr bound to concLude that $$\int_{q^{+}(Y,s,\sQrt{\fraC{1}{2}(t-S)})}K^{2}(x,T;Z,r)dg_{r}dR\leq\dFrAC{\ovErline{C}}{(t-s)^{\frAc{n}{2}-1}}\eXp\left(-\dfrAc{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\OVerline{c}(T-s)}\right).$$ in termS of The RescALeD fLow, ThIS is $$\INt_{\WidEHat{q}^{+}(y,-\frac{1}{2},\frAc{1}{\SqRt{2}})}\widEhat{k}^{2}(X,1/2;Z,R)D\widEhaT{g}_{r}dR\leq\oVerline{C}\ | (t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\wideh at{B}(y,\t au,\f rac {1} {\ sqrt {2}} )|_{\widetilde { g}_r }\\&\geq b(t-s)^{\frac {n}{2 }} , \end { al igned }$$ whe r e$ \ tau $is de fi n ed by $ \fr ac{1}{2 }(s+t)+(t- s)\ ta u=r$, so tha t $ \tau\in[-\ fra c{1}{2},0]$. Co mbinin gest i mates gi ves $ $\begi n {align ed}
\int_ {B ( y,r,\s q rt{t-r} ) } K( x,t; z,r)dg_{r}(z)&\le q \d f rac{C^{*}e^{C^ {*}}(t -s ) ^{ \ f rac {n} {2}}}{|B(x ,r ,\sqr t {t-r})| _ {r } } \ exp \ left(-\dfrac{ d_{s}^{2}(x , y)} {32B^{ 2} (t- s )}\rig ht)\\ &\ l eqb^{-1}C^{*} e^{C ^{*}}\exp \left( - \dfrac{ d _{s}^{2 }(x,y) }{3 2B^ {2}( t -s )} \ri gh t ).\ e nd {al i gne d}$$ Now i nt egrat ingf r o m $r= s$to $ r=\fr ac{1}{2}(t+s) $ g ives $$\ int_{ Q^{+} (y,s ,\ sqrt{ \frac{ 1}{2} (t -s)})}K(x,t;z,r )dg_ {r}dr\leq \ov er lin e{ C}(t- s )\exp\ lef t(- \dfrac{ d_{s}^{ 2 }(x ,y ) } { \b ar{C}(t-s)}\right) ,$ $ so we usethe on - di ag o nal uppe rbou nd t o concl udet ha t $$\int _{Q^{+ } (y ,s ,\sqrt{ \f rac{1} {2 }(t -s) })}K^ { 2}(x ,t;z,r )dg_{r}d r\leq \ dfrac{\overlin e {C}}{(t-s)^{\ f ra c { n} { 2}-1 }}\ exp\left(-\ dfra c {d_{ s}^{ 2 }( x,y ) }{\ov erlin e{ C }( t -s)}\right).$$ In t er ms ofthe r escaled flow, this is $ $ \ i nt_{\wid ehat { Q} ^ {+}(y,-\frac{1 }{2}, \frac{1}{\ s qrt{2}}) }\wid ehat{K}^ {2}(x,1/2 ; z ,r)d\wid eha t{g }_{ r}d r \ le q\overline{C} \ | (t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}|\widehat{B}(y,\tau,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})|_{\widetilde{g}_r}\\&\geq b(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}},\end{aligned}$$_where $\tau$_is defined by $\frac{1}{2}(s+t)+(t-s)\tau=r$,_so that_$\tau\in[-\frac{1}{2},0]$._Combining estimates_gives_$$\begin{aligned}
\int_{B(y,r,\sqrt{t-r})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}(z)&\leq\dfrac{C^{*}e^{C^{*}}(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{|B(x,r,\sqrt{t-r})|_{r}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right)\\&\leq b^{-1}C^{*}e^{C^{*}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{32B^{2}(t-s)}\right).\end{aligned}$$ Now_integrating from $r=s$_to $r=\frac{1}{2}(t+s)$ gives $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}(t-s)\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\bar{C}(t-s)}\right),$$_so we use_the_on-diagonal upper bound to conclude that $$\int_{Q^{+}(y,s,\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(t-s)})}K^{2}(x,t;z,r)dg_{r}dr\leq\dfrac{\overline{C}}{(t-s)^{\frac{n}{2}-1}}\exp\left(-\dfrac{d_{s}^{2}(x,y)}{\overline{C}(t-s)}\right).$$ In terms of the rescaled flow, this_is_$$\int_{\widehat{Q}^{+}(y,-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})}\widehat{K}^{2}(x,1/2;z,r)d\widehat{g}_{r}dr\leq\overline{C}\ |
cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $B\in \cB$ and $A\in \cA$, a morphism $B\to A$ in $\cD/\cC$ is represented by a roof $$B \xleftarrow{\beta} D \xrightarrow{\alpha} A$$ where $\beta\colon D\to B$ is a morphism in $\cD$ with $\cone(\beta)\in \cC$ and $\alpha\colon D\to A$ is any morphism in $\cD$; see [@Neeman Def. 2.1.11]. Put $C \coloneqq \cone(\beta)[-1] \in \cC$. We apply the triangle of functors $i^*_\cA \to \id \to i^!_\cB \to$ (formally, $i^*_\cA$ has to be replaced by $i_\cA i^*_\cA$ and $i^!_\cB$ by $i_\cB i^!_\cB$) to the triangle of objects $C\to D\to B \to$ and obtain the diagram $$\xymatrix@C=2em@R=3ex{
i^!_\cB C \ar[r] \ar[d] & i^!_\cB D \ar[r] \ar[d]^\gamma & B \ar[d] \\
C \ar[r] \ar[d] & D \ar[r] \ar[d] & B \ar[d] \\
i^*_\cA C \ar[r] & i^*_\cA D \ar[r] & 0 \\
}$$ where we have used $i^!_\cB B = B$ and $i^*_\cA B = 0$. Now $i^!_\cB C \in \cC\cap\cB$ by assumption. The left column thus forces $i^*_\cA C \cong i^*_\cA D \in \cC$. We get that $\cone{\beta\gamma}\in \cC$ since $\cone{\beta}, \cone{\gamma}\in \cC$; see [@Neeman Lem. 1.5.6]. Therefore, we get another roof representing the same morphism in $\cD/\cC$, replacing $D$ by $i^!_\cB D$: | cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $ B\in \cB$ and $ A\in \cA$, a morphism $ B\to A$ in $ \cD/\cC$ is represented by a roof $ $ B \xleftarrow{\beta } D \xrightarrow{\alpha } A$ $ where $ \beta\colon D\to B$ is a morphism in $ \cD$ with $ \cone(\beta)\in \cC$ and $ \alpha\colon D\to A$ is any morphism in $ \cD$; visualize [ @Neeman Def. 2.1.11 ]. place $ C \coloneqq \cone(\beta)[-1 ] \in \cC$. We apply the triangle of functors $ i^*_\cA \to \id \to i^!_\cB \to$ (formally, $ i^*_\cA$ have to be replaced by $ i_\cA i^*_\cA$ and $ i^!_\cB$ by $ i_\cB i^!_\cB$) to the triangle of object $ C\to D\to bel \to$ and obtain the diagram $ $ \xymatrix@C=2em@R=3ex {
i^!_\cB C \ar[r ] \ar[d ] & i^!_\cB D \ar[r ] \ar[d]^\gamma & B \ar[d ] \\
C \ar[r ] \ar[d ] & D \ar[r ] \ar[d ] & B \ar[d ] \\
i^*_\cA C \ar[r ] & i^*_\cA D \ar[r ] & 0 \\
} $ $ where we have use $ i^!_\cB B = B$ and $ i^*_\cA B = 0$. immediately $ i^!_\cB C \in \cC\cap\cB$ by assumption. The left column therefore forces $ i^*_\cA C \cong i^*_\cA D \in \cC$. We get that $ \cone{\beta\gamma}\in \cC$ since $ \cone{\beta }, \cone{\gamma}\in \cC$; see [ @Neeman Lem. 1.5.6 ]. Therefore, we get another roof represent the same morphism in $ \cD/\cC$, replacing $ D$ by $ i^!_\cB D$: | cA/(\cW\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $B\in \cB$ akd $A\in \cA$, a morpkusm $B\tm A$ in $\cD/\cC$ is represented by a roof $$B \xlehtareow{\beuc} D \xrightarrow{\alpha} A$$ where $\heta\colob D\ti B$ is a moclhism ik $\cD$ slth $\cmie(\beta)\in \cC$ and $\alpha\colot D\to A$ is any mur'hism in $\cD$; see [@Neeman Def. 2.1.11]. Put $C \coljneqq \cpnf(\beta)[-1] \in \cC$. We appkr ths triangle of functors $i^*_\cA \to \id \tk i^!_\cB \tm$ (formally, $i^*_\cS$ has to be replaced by $i_\cW i^*_\cW$ and $i^!_\cB$ by $i_\cB i^!_\fB$) to the ttjandoe of objectr $C\to D\to B \to$ and obtzin the diagram $$\xymatrix@C=2em@R=3ex{
i^!_\zB C \cr[r] \ar[d] & i^!_\cV E \ag[t] \ar[d]^\gamma & U \ar[d] \\
C \ar[v] \ar[d] & D \ar[r] \ar[d] & B \sr[d] \\
i^*_\cQ C \ar[r] & i^*_\cA D \ar[r] & 0 \\
}$$ whete we have uaed $i^!_\cB B = B$ and $u^*_\cQ B = 0$. Now $i^!_\cB X \iv \cD\cep\cG$ by adsujption. The left columb thus forces $i^*_\cA C \cjbg i^*_\cA D \in \cD$. We gqt that $\cone{\beta\gamma}\in \cC$ since $\cone{\beta}, \cohe{\gamma}\in \cC$; see [@Neeman Lem. 1.5.6]. Therefore, we get another woof representing the same morphism in $\cD/\cC$, replawing $V$ cy $n^!_\gN D$: | cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $B\in \cB$ and $A\in morphism A$ in is represented by \xrightarrow{\alpha} where $\beta\colon D\to is a morphism $\cD$ with $\cone(\beta)\in \cC$ and $\alpha\colon A$ is any morphism in $\cD$; see [@Neeman Def. 2.1.11]. Put $C \coloneqq \in \cC$. We apply the triangle of functors $i^*_\cA \to \id \to i^!_\cB (formally, has be by $i_\cA i^*_\cA$ and $i^!_\cB$ by $i_\cB i^!_\cB$) to the triangle of objects $C\to D\to B and obtain the diagram $$\xymatrix@C=2em@R=3ex{ i^!_\cB C \ar[r] & i^!_\cB D \ar[r] & B \ar[d] \\ C \ar[d] D \ar[r] & \ar[d] i^*_\cA C \ar[r] i^*_\cA D \ar[r] & 0 \\ }$$ where we have used $i^!_\cB B = B$ and $i^*_\cA = 0$. C \in by The column thus forces \cong i^*_\cA D \in \cC$. We \cC$ since $\cone{\beta}, \cone{\gamma}\in \cC$; see [@Neeman Lem. Therefore, we another roof representing the same morphism $\cD/\cC$, replacing $D$ by $i^!_\cB D$: | cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $B\in \cB$ and $A\In \cA$, a morphIsm $B\tO A$ iN $\cD/\CC$ Is rePresEnted by a roof $$B \xLEftaRrow{\beta} D \xrightarrow{\alPha} A$$ wHeRE $\betA\CoLon D\tO B$ is a moRPhISM in $\CD$ WiTh $\cOnE(\BeTa)\in \cc$ anD $\alpha\cOlon D\to A$ is Any MoRphism in $\cD$; seE [@neEman Def. 2.1.11]. Put $c \coLoneqq \cone(\beTa)[-1] \iN \cC$. We aPpLy tHE triaNglE of fuNctors $I^*_\CA \to \id \To i^!_\cB \to$ (foRmALly, $i^*_\cA$ HAs to be rEPLaCed bY $i_\cA i^*_\cA$ and $i^!_\cB$ by $i_\cb I^!_\cb$) To the triangle oF objecTs $c\To d\TO B \tO$ anD obtain the DiAgram $$\XYmatrix@c=2Em@r=3EX{
I^!_\cB c \Ar[r] \ar[d] & i^!_\cB D \ar[r] \Ar[d]^\gamma & B \ar[D] \\
c \ar[R] \ar[d] & D \aR[r] \Ar[d] & b \Ar[d] \\
i^*_\cA c \ar[r] & i^*_\CA d \Ar[r] & 0 \\
}$$ Where we have Used $I^!_\cB B = B$ and $i^*_\CA B = 0$. Now $I^!_\CB C \in \cC\CAp\cB$ by aSsumptIon. the Left COlUmN thUs FOrcES $i^*_\CA C \COng I^*_\cA D \in \cC$. we GeT that $\Cone{\BETA\GammA}\in \CC$ siNce $\coNe{\beta}, \cone{\gamMa}\iN \cC$; sEE [@NeEman LEm. 1.5.6]. TheRefoRe, We get AnotheR roof RePresenting the saMe moRphism in $\cd/\cC$, RePlaCiNg $D$ by $I^!_\CB D$: | cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$. For $B\in \cB$ an d $ A\ in \ cA$, a morphism $B \ to A $ in $\cD/\cC$ is repr esent ed by a ro of $$ B \xlef t ar r o w{\ be ta } D \ x ri ghtar row {\alpha } A$$ wher e $ \b eta\colon D\ t oB$ is a mo rph ism in $\cD$ wi th $\c on e(\ b eta)\ in\cC$and $\ a lpha\c olon D\to A $ is an y morphi s m i n $\ cD$; see [@Neeman De f . 2.1.11]. Put $C \c ol o ne q q \c one (\beta)[-1 ]\in \ c C$. Wea pp l y the triangle of f unctors $i^ * _\c A \to\i d \ t o i^!_ \cB \ to $ (f ormally, $i ^*_\ cA$ has t o be r e placedb y $i_\c A i^*_ \cA $ a nd $ i ^! _\ cB$ b y $i _ \c B i ^ !_\ cB$) toth etrian gleo f o bjec ts$C\t o D\t o B \to$ andobt aint hediagr am $$ \xym at rix@C =2em@R =3ex{
i ^!_\cB C \ar[r] \ar [d] & i^! _\c BD \ ar [r] \ a r[d]^\ gam ma& B \ar [d] \\ C \ ar[r] \ar[d] & D \ar[r]\ar[d] &B\ ar[d] \\
i ^*_ \cAC \ar[r ] & i^*_ \cA D\ ar [r ] & 0 \\
} $$whe re we have used$i^!_\cB B =B $ and $i^*_\cA B = 0$. Now $ i ^! _ \ cB C \i n \ cC\cap\cB$by a s sump tion . T hel eft c olumn t h us forces $i^*_\cA C \ co ng i^* _\cAD \in \cC$. W e get that $ \ cone{\be ta\g a mm a }\in \cC$ sinc e $\c one{\beta} , \cone{\ gamma }\in \cC $; see [@ N e eman Lem . 1 .5. 6]. Th e r ef ore, we get a n o ther r oof rep res entingthe sa memor ph ism in $\ cD/\cC$, r ep la ci ng$D$ b y $i^!_\c BD$: | cA/(\cA\cap \cC)\bigr)=0$._For $B\in_\cB$ and $A\in \cA$,_a morphism_$B\to_A$ in_$\cD/\cC$_is represented by_a roof $$B_\xleftarrow{\beta} D \xrightarrow{\alpha} A$$_where $\beta\colon D\to_B$_is a morphism in $\cD$ with $\cone(\beta)\in \cC$ and $\alpha\colon D\to A$ is any_morphism_in $\cD$;_see_[@Neeman_Def. 2.1.11]. Put $C \coloneqq \cone(\beta)[-1]_\in \cC$. We apply the_triangle of_functors $i^*_\cA \to \id \to i^!_\cB \to$ (formally,_$i^*_\cA$_has to be_replaced by $i_\cA i^*_\cA$ and $i^!_\cB$ by $i_\cB i^!_\cB$)_to the triangle of objects $C\to_D\to B \to$_and_obtain_the diagram $$\xymatrix@C=2em@R=3ex{
i^!_\cB C_\ar[r] \ar[d] & i^!_\cB D \ar[r]_\ar[d]^\gamma & B \ar[d] \\
_ C_\ar[r] \ar[d] & _ _D \ar[r]_\ar[d] & B \ar[d] \\
i^*_\cA_C \ar[r] _ _ _ & i^*_\cA D \ar[r] _ _ & 0 \\
}$$_where_we have used_$i^!_\cB_B_= B$_and $i^*_\cA B_=_0$. Now_$i^!_\cB_C \in \cC\cap\cB$ by assumption. The_left_column thus forces $i^*_\cA C \cong i^*_\cA_D \in \cC$. We_get_that $\cone{\beta\gamma}\in \cC$ since_$\cone{\beta}, \cone{\gamma}\in \cC$; see [@Neeman_Lem. 1.5.6]. Therefore, we get another roof_representing the_same morphism_in $\cD/\cC$, replacing $D$ by $i^!_\cB D$: |
The Hubble-volume simulation [@2001MNRAS.321..372J; @2000MNRAS.319..209C], and a smaller scale simulation including (adiabatic) gas physics by @2002ApJ...579...16W performed with [GADGET]{} [@2001NewA....6...79S; @2002MNRAS.333..649S].
All-sky maps of the SZ-sky were constructed by using the light-cone output of the Hubble-volume simulation as a cluster catalogue and template clusters from the small-scale gas-dynamical simulation. In this way, the sky-maps contain all clusters above $5\cdot 10^{13} M_{\sun}/h$ out to redshift $z=1.48$. The analysis undertaken by gives expected mass and redshift ranges for detectable thermal SZ-clusters, which are covered completely by the all-sky SZ-map presented here. The maps show the correct 2-point halo correlation function, incorporate the evolution of the mass function and the correct distribution of angular sizes.
Furthermore, they exhibit cluster substructure and deviations from the ideal cluster scaling relations induced by the departure from spherical symmetry. The velocities used for computing the kinetic SZ-effect correspond to the ambient density field. The map construction process and the properties of the resulting map are in detail described in @2004_szmap. Visual impressions of the SZ-maps are given by Figs. \[figure\_thszfield\] and \[figure\_kinszfield\].
The fluxes generated by the thermal SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{Y}(x)$ and of the kinetic SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{W}(x)$ are given by eqns. (\[eq:S\_thSZ\]) and (\[eq:S\_kinSZ\]), respectively. The dimensionless frequency is defined as $x=h\nu/(k_B
T_\mathrm{CMB})$ and the flux density of the CMB is given by $S_0=(k_b T_\mathrm{CMB})^3\pi^3/c^2/h^2/5400=22.9~\mathrm{Jy}/\mathrm{arcmin}^2$: $$\begin{aligned}
S_\mathcal{Y}(x) & = & S_0\cdot\mathcal{Y}\cdot
\frac{x^4\cdot\exp(x)}{(\exp(x)-1)^2}\cdot\left[x | The Hubble - volume simulation [ @2001MNRAS.321.. 372J; @2000MNRAS.319.. 209C ], and a smaller scale model include (adiabatic) gas physics by @2002ApJ... 579... 16W performed with [ GADGET ] { } [ @2001NewA.... 6... 79S; @2002MNRAS.333.. 649S ].
All - sky function of the SZ - sky were constructed by using the abstemious - cone output signal of the Hubble - volume model as a cluster catalogue and template bunch from the small - scale gas - dynamical model. In this way, the sky - maps contain all clusters above $ 5\cdot 10^{13 } M_{\sun}/h$ out to redshift $ z=1.48$. The analysis undertake by gives expected mass and red shift ranges for detectable thermal SZ - clusters, which are report wholly by the all - sky SZ - map presented here. The maps show the correct 2 - point aura correlation function, incorporate the evolution of the mass function and the correct distribution of angular sizes.
Furthermore, they exhibit cluster substructure and deviations from the ideal cluster scaling relations induced by the departure from spherical isotropy. The speed used for computing the kinetic SZ - consequence correspond to the ambient density field. The map structure process and the property of the resulting map are in contingent described in @2004_szmap. Visual impressions of the SZ - maps are given by Figs. \[figure\_thszfield\ ] and \[figure\_kinszfield\ ].
The fluxes render by the thermal SZ - effect $ S_\mathcal{Y}(x)$ and of the kinetic SZ - effect $ S_\mathcal{W}(x)$ are given by eqns. (\[eq: S\_thSZ\ ]) and (\[eq: S\_kinSZ\ ]), respectively. The dimensionless frequency is define as $ ten = h\nu/(k_B
T_\mathrm{CMB})$ and the flux density of the CMB is given by $ S_0=(k_b T_\mathrm{CMB})^3\pi^3 / c^2 / h^2/5400=22.9~\mathrm{Jy}/\mathrm{arcmin}^2 $: $ $ \begin{aligned }
S_\mathcal{Y}(x) & = & S_0\cdot\mathcal{Y}\cdot
\frac{x^4\cdot\exp(x)}{(\exp(x)-1)^2}\cdot\left[x | Thf Hubble-volume simulatiok [@2001MNRAS.321..372J; @2000MNRAS.319..209C], cbd a skaller scale skmulation including (adiabatir) gaw phywics by @2002ApJ...579...16W performed with [GADHET]{} [@2001NewA....6...79W; @2002MNCAS.333..649S].
All-sky maps of the SD-fky scre cmistructed by uslng the ligvt-cone output mf tke Hubble-volume simulation as a cluseer catsllgue and templwte bltsteds from the small-scale gas-dynamicam simuletion. In this wsy, the sky-maps contain all cludters above $5\cdot 10^{13} L_{\sun}/h$ out ti reqwhift $z=1.48$. The xnalysis undertaken by gives expected mass and redshiwt rauges for dejzxtahne thermal WZ-clufters, which are covesed comlletely by the aln-skt SZ-map presented herx. The maps show the sorrect 2-pmiut halo correlation fynxtion, incmrpofqte tht etolhtion lf vhe mass fuhction and rhe correct distribityin of angular sizes.
Suwthermore, they exhibit cluster substrucuure znd deviations from the ideal cluster scalinh relatiogs induced by the departure from spherical symmetsy. Thx xelicltier uded for computing the kinetic SZ-effect corres[knc no the ambient deksity field. The mal fomftruction prozess aus fhe properties of hhe resolting map are yn drtail described in @2004_szmap. Viwual impresspons of the SZ-maps are given by Fngs. \[figore\_thsafield\] and \[figure\_kinszfneld\].
Ths fluxes gejerated bg the thermal SZ-ewfebt $S_\kathcal{Y}(x)$ and of the kinetyc SZ-effert $S_\mcthcal{W}(x)$ are given by eqns. (\[eq:D\_thSZ\]) and (\[eq:S\_kinSZ\]), respeftivepy. The dimendionless frequency is defined as $x=h\nu/(k_B
T_\mathtm{CKB})$ dnd the ylux dcnsity of the CIB is given by $S_0=(k_b T_\mcthrm{COB})^3\pi^3/c^2/h^2/5400=22.9~\mathgm{Jy}/\mathrk{arcmin}^2$: $$\begyn{aligned}
S_\matvfal{Y}(x) & = & S_0\cdmt\mathcaj{Y}\cdit
\frqc{x^4\cdot\dbp(x)}{(\exp(x)-1)^2}\cdot\lefy[x | The Hubble-volume simulation [@2001MNRAS.321..372J; @2000MNRAS.319..209C], and a simulation (adiabatic) gas by @2002ApJ...579...16W performed maps the SZ-sky were by using the output of the Hubble-volume simulation as cluster catalogue and template clusters from the small-scale gas-dynamical simulation. In this way, sky-maps contain all clusters above $5\cdot 10^{13} M_{\sun}/h$ out to redshift $z=1.48$. The undertaken gives mass redshift ranges for detectable thermal SZ-clusters, which are covered completely by the all-sky SZ-map presented here. maps show the correct 2-point halo correlation function, the evolution of the function and the correct distribution angular Furthermore, they cluster and from the ideal scaling relations induced by the departure from spherical symmetry. The velocities used for computing the kinetic SZ-effect to the field. The construction and properties of the are in detail described in @2004_szmap. the SZ-maps are given by Figs. \[figure\_thszfield\] and The fluxes by the thermal SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{Y}(x)$ and the kinetic SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{W}(x)$ are given by eqns. and (\[eq:S\_kinSZ\]), respectively. The dimensionless frequency is defined as $x=h\nu/(k_B T_\mathrm{CMB})$ and the flux density CMB is given by T_\mathrm{CMB})^3\pi^3/c^2/h^2/5400=22.9~\mathrm{Jy}/\mathrm{arcmin}^2$: $$\begin{aligned} S_\mathcal{Y}(x) = S_0\cdot\mathcal{Y}\cdot | The Hubble-volume simulation [@2001mNRAS.321..372J; @2000MNRAs.319..209C], and A smAllEr ScalE simUlation includiNG (adiAbatic) gas physics by @2002ApJ...579...16W PerfoRmED witH [gAdGET]{} [@2001NEwA....6...79S; @2002MNRas.333..649S].
aLL-skY mApS of ThE sZ-Sky weRe cOnstrucTed by using The LiGht-cone outpuT Of The Hubble-vOluMe simulation As a ClusteR cAtaLOgue aNd tEmplaTe clusTErs froM the small-ScALe gas-dYNamical SIMuLatiOn. In this way, the sky-MApS Contain all clusTers abOvE $5\CdOT 10^{13} m_{\suN}/h$ oUt to redshiFt $Z=1.48$. The aNAlysis uNDeRTAKen BY gives expecteD mass and redSHifT rangeS fOr dETectabLe theRmAL SZ-Clusters, whiCh arE covered cOmpletELy by the ALl-sky SZ-Map preSenTed Here. tHe MaPs sHoW The COrRecT 2-PoiNt halo coRrElAtion FuncTION, IncoRpoRate The evOlution of the mAss FuncTIon And thE corrEct dIsTribuTion of AngulAr Sizes.
FurthermorE, theY exhibit cLusTeR suBsTructURe and dEviAtiOns from The ideaL CluStER SCaLing relations inducEd BY ThE departuRe from SPhErICal symmeTrY. ThE velOCIties Used FOr ComputinG the kiNEtIc sZ-effecT cOrrespOnD to The AmbieNT denSity fiEld. The maP consTRuction process ANd the propertiES oF THe REsulTinG map are in deTail DEscrIbed IN @2004_sZmaP. visuaL imprEsSIoNS of the SZ-maps are giveN bY Figs. \[fIgure\_Thszfield\] and \[fIgure\_kinszFIELd\].
The fluXes gENeRAted by the thermAl SZ-eFfect $S_\mathCAl{Y}(x)$ and oF the kInetic SZ-Effect $S_\maTHCal{W}(x)$ are GivEn bY eqNs. (\[eQ:s\_ThsZ\]) and (\[eq:S\_kinSZ\]), RESpecTiVely. The DimEnsionlEss FreQueNcy Is Defined as $X=h\nu/(k_B
T_\mAtHrM{CmB})$ And The flUX density Of The cMb is Given BY $S_0=(k_b T_\mAthrm{cMB})^3\pI^3/c^2/H^2/5400=22.9~\mAThrM{Jy}/\mathRM{aRCMin}^2$: $$\bEgIn{AligNed}
s_\mAthcaL{Y}(x) & = & S_0\CDot\Mathcal{y}\cdot
\frac{X^4\cdOT\exp(X)}{(\eXp(X)-1)^2}\cdot\leFt[x | The Hubble-volume simulat ion [@2001 MNRAS .32 1.. 37 2J;@200 0MNRAS.319..20 9 C],and a smaller scale si mulat io n inc l ud ing ( adiabat i c) g asph ys ics b y @ 2002A pJ. ..579.. .16W perfo rme dwith [GADGET ] {} [@2001New A.. ..6...79S; @ 200 2MNRAS .3 33. . 649S] .
All-s ky map s of th e SZ-skywe r e cons t ructedb y u sing the light-cone o u tp u t of the Hubbl e-volu me si m u lat ion as a clus te r cat a logue a n dt e m pla t e clusters fr om the smal l -sc ale ga s- dyn a micalsimul at i on. In this wa y, t he sky-ma ps con t ain all cluster s abov e $ 5\c dot1 0^ {1 3}M_ { \su n }/ h$o utto redsh if t$z=1. 48$. T h e ana lys is u ndert aken by gives ex pect e d m ass a nd re dshi ft rang es for dete ct able thermal SZ -clu sters, wh ich a reco vered comple tel y b y the a ll-skyS Z-m ap p r es ented here. The ma ps s ho w the co rrect2 -p oi n t halo c or rel atio n funct ion, in corporat e thee vo lu tion of t he mas sfun cti on an d the corre ct distr ibuti o n of angular s i zes.
Further m or e , t h ey e xhi bit cluster sub s truc ture an d d e viati ons f ro m t h e ideal cluster sca li ng rel ation s induced bythe depart u r e from sp heri c al symmetry. Theveloc ities used for comp uting the kin etic SZ-e f f ect corr esp ond to th e am bient density f ield .The map co nstruct ion pr oce ssan d the pro pertiesof t he r esu lting map arein de ta ildescr i bed in @200 4_sz ma p. Vis ual imp r es s i onsof t he S Z-m ap s are giv e n b y Figs. \[figure \_t h szfi el d\ ] and \ [figure\_kins zf ield\].
T he fl uxes g e n erated b y the thermal SZ-effect $S_\mat hca l{Y}( x)$and of th e k inetic SZ - effect $S_\m athca l{ W}( x ) $ are g iv enby eqns. (\[ e q :S\ _thSZ \] ) an d (\[eq :S\_kinSZ\]), resp e cti vely. The dim ens ionl e s sfre q ue n cyis def i n ed as $x=h\nu/( k_B
T_\ma th r m{ CMB})$ and the f lux den sity of theC MB is g iven by $ S_0=(k_bT_ \mat h r m{C MB})^3\pi^ 3/c^2/h^ 2/5400=22 . 9~\ma t hr m{Jy} /\m athrm{ ar cmi n}^2$ : $$\b e gin {alig ned}
S _\ mathca l{Y}( x) & = & S _0\cdot\mathcal{Y}\cdot
\frac {x^4\ cdo t\exp(x)} {(\ e xp( x)-1)^2}\ cdot \left[x | The_Hubble-volume simulation_[@2001MNRAS.321..372J; @2000MNRAS.319..209C], and a_smaller scale_simulation_including (adiabatic)_gas_physics by @2002ApJ...579...16W_performed with [GADGET]{}_[@2001NewA....6...79S; @2002MNRAS.333..649S].
All-sky maps of_the SZ-sky were_constructed_by using the light-cone output of the Hubble-volume simulation as a cluster catalogue and_template_clusters from_the_small-scale_gas-dynamical simulation. In this way,_the sky-maps contain all clusters_above $5\cdot_10^{13} M_{\sun}/h$ out to redshift $z=1.48$. The analysis_undertaken_by gives expected_mass and redshift ranges for detectable thermal SZ-clusters, which_are covered completely by the all-sky_SZ-map presented here._The_maps_show the correct 2-point_halo correlation function, incorporate the evolution_of the mass function and the_correct distribution of angular sizes.
Furthermore, they exhibit_cluster substructure and deviations from the_ideal cluster scaling relations induced_by the_departure from spherical symmetry. The_velocities used for_computing the_kinetic SZ-effect correspond_to the ambient density field. The_map construction process_and the properties of the resulting_map_are in detail_described_in_@2004_szmap. Visual_impressions of the_SZ-maps_are given_by_Figs. \[figure\_thszfield\] and \[figure\_kinszfield\].
The fluxes generated by_the_thermal SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{Y}(x)$ and of the kinetic_SZ-effect $S_\mathcal{W}(x)$ are given_by_eqns. (\[eq:S\_thSZ\]) and (\[eq:S\_kinSZ\]), respectively._The dimensionless frequency is defined_as $x=h\nu/(k_B
T_\mathrm{CMB})$ and the flux_density of_the CMB_is given by $S_0=(k_b T_\mathrm{CMB})^3\pi^3/c^2/h^2/5400=22.9~\mathrm{Jy}/\mathrm{arcmin}^2$: $$\begin{aligned}
S_\mathcal{Y}(x) & = & S_0\cdot\mathcal{Y}\cdot
\frac{x^4\cdot\exp(x)}{(\exp(x)-1)^2}\cdot\left[x |
some condition is needed, as shown by the example below.
Let $Z$ be the direct sum $\bigoplus\limits_{p \ \text{prime}} \mathbb{Z}_p$ and let $G_n$ be the graph product of $n$ copies of $Z$ over the cycle $C_n$ of length $n \geq 5$. We claim that $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ is not acylindrically hyperbolic.
As a consequence of Corollary C (stated in the introduction), the automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ decomposes as $\left( \mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G}) \right) \rtimes \mathrm{Sym}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. As the property of being acylindrically hyperbolic is stable under taking infinite normal subgroups [@OsinAcyl Lemma 7.2], it is sufficient to show that $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is not acylindrically hyperbolic. So let $\iota(g) \varphi$ be an automorphism of this subgroup, where $g \in G_n$ and $\varphi \in \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. For each copy $Z_i$ of $Z$, the reduced word representing $g$ contains only finitely many syllables in $Z_i$; let $S_i \subset Z_i$ denote this set of syllables. Clearly, there exists an infinite collection of automorphisms of $Z_i$ fixing $S_i$ pointwise; furthermore, we may suppose that this collection generates a subgroup of automorphisms $\Phi_i \leq \mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ which is a free abelian group of infinite rank. Notice that $\phi(g)=g$ for every $\phi \in \Phi_i$. Therefore, for every $\psi \in \Phi_1 \times \cdots \times \Phi_n \leq \mathrm{Loc}$, we have
$\psi \cdot \iota(g) \varphi= \iota(\psi(g)) \cdot \psi \varphi=g \cdot \psi \varphi= g \cdot \varphi \psi = g \varphi \cdot \psi$,
since $\varphi$ and $\psi$ | some condition is needed, as shown by the example downstairs.
lease $ Z$ be the direct sum $ \bigoplus\limits_{p \ \text{prime } } \mathbb{Z}_p$ and let $ G_n$ be the graph intersection of $ n$ copies of $ Z$ over the cycle $ C_n$ of distance $ normality \geq 5$. We claim that $ \mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ is not acylindrically hyperbolic.
As a consequence of Corollary C (stated in the presentation), the automorphism group $ \mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ decomposes as $ \left (\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G }) \right) \rtimes \mathrm{Sym}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. As the property of being acylindrically hyperbolic is stable under aim infinite normal subgroups [ @OsinAcyl Lemma 7.2 ], it is sufficient to read that $ \mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is not acylindrically hyperbolic. therefore let $ \iota(g) \varphi$ be an automorphism of this subgroup, where $ g \in G_n$ and $ \varphi \in \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. For each copy $ Z_i$ of $ Z$, the reduced word represent $ g$ contains only finitely many syllables in $ Z_i$; lease $ S_i \subset Z_i$ denote this set of syllables. intelligibly, there exists an infinite collection of automorphisms of $ Z_i$ fixing $ S_i$ pointwise; furthermore, we may suppose that this solicitation generates a subgroup of automorphisms $ \Phi_i \leq \mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ which is a free abelian group of infinite rank. Notice that $ \phi(g)=g$ for every $ \phi \in \Phi_i$. Therefore, for every $ \psi \in \Phi_1 \times \cdots \times \Phi_n \leq \mathrm{Loc}$, we have
$ \psi \cdot \iota(g) \varphi= \iota(\psi(g) ) \cdot \psi \varphi = gravitational constant \cdot \psi \varphi= g \cdot \varphi \psi = g \varphi \cdot \psi$,
since $ \varphi$ and $ \psi$ | sole condition is needed, ar shown by the gxqmple uelow.
Lef $Z$ be tfe direct sum $\bigoplus\limits_{' \ \twxt{prume}} \mathbb{Z}_p$ and let $G_v$ be the hraph priducu of $n$ copies of $V$ over tmz cycmc $C_n$ mh length $n \geq 5$. We claim dhat $\mathrm{Aut}(C_n)$ id not acylindrically hyperbolic.
As a conseqiejce of Corollaty C (xeates in the introduction), the automorpgism grmup $\mathrm{Aut}(B_n)$ decomposes as $\left( \mathgm{Inj}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Llc}(C_n, \mathcao{G}) \rytht) \rtimes \mxthrm{Sym}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. As the property of being acylindrkcallv hyperbolix us djable under vaking infinite novkal sutgroups [@OsinAcyl Lemms 7.2], mt iw sufficient to show vhat $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtiies \mathrk{Lkc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is bor acynindsicauoy fyptrbpljc. So pet $\iota(g) \varlhi$ be an aytomorphism of this stvgroup, where $f \in G_g$ wnd $\varphi \in \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. For tach dopy $Z_i$ of $Z$, the reducee word representing $g$ contains only finitely many syllables in $Z_i$; let $S_i \subset Z_i$ dxnute tmis rwt of syllables. Clearly, there exists an infinitq cplkection of autjmorphisms pf $Z_o$ fixing $S_i$ pokntwisz; fhrthermore, we may duppose that this coljectoon generates a subgroup of automorphisiw $\Phi_i \leq \mathrm{Abt}(Z_i)$ which ir a gree sbelian group of infinice rani. Notice thwt $\phi(g)=g$ rur every $\phi \in \Ohi_p$. Tharefore, for every $\psi \in \Pri_1 \times \rdots \times \Ohi_n \leq \mwthrm{Loc}$, wf havc
$\[si \cdot \iota(g) \varohi= \iltd(\psi(g)) \cdot \psi \varphi=g \cdot \psi \varphi= g \rvot \varphi \pso = g \narphi \cdjt \psl$,
since $\varphi$ agd $\psi$ | some condition is needed, as shown by below. $Z$ be direct sum $\bigoplus\limits_{p $G_n$ the graph product $n$ copies of over the cycle $C_n$ of length \geq 5$. We claim that $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ is not acylindrically hyperbolic. As a consequence Corollary C (stated in the introduction), the automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ decomposes as $\left( \rtimes \mathcal{G}) \rtimes \mathcal{G})$. As the property of being acylindrically hyperbolic is stable under taking infinite normal subgroups [@OsinAcyl 7.2], it is sufficient to show that $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is not hyperbolic. So let $\iota(g) \varphi$ an of this where \in and $\varphi \in \mathcal{G})$. For each copy $Z_i$ of $Z$, the reduced word representing $g$ contains only finitely many syllables $Z_i$; let Z_i$ denote set syllables. there exists an of automorphisms of $Z_i$ fixing $S_i$ may suppose that this collection generates a subgroup automorphisms $\Phi_i \mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ which is a free abelian of infinite rank. Notice that $\phi(g)=g$ for every \in \Phi_i$. Therefore, for every $\psi \in \Phi_1 \times \cdots \times \Phi_n \leq \mathrm{Loc}$, we \cdot \iota(g) \varphi= \iota(\psi(g)) \psi \varphi=g \cdot \varphi= \cdot \psi g \varphi \psi$, since $\varphi$ and $\psi$ | some condition is needed, as shOwn by the exAmple BelOw.
LEt $z$ be tHe diRect sum $\bigopluS\LimiTs_{p \ \text{prime}} \mathbb{Z}_p$ anD let $G_N$ bE The gRApH prodUct of $n$ cOPiES Of $Z$ OvEr The CyCLe $c_n$ of lEngTh $n \geq 5$. WE claim that $\MatHrM{Aut}(G_n)$ is not aCYlIndrically HypErbolic.
As a coNseQuence Of corOLlary c (stAted iN the inTRoductIon), the autOmORphism GRoup $\matHRM{AUt}(G_n)$ Decomposes as $\left( \mAThRM{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \maThrm{LoC}(C_N, \MaTHCal{g}) \riGht) \rtimes \mAtHrm{SyM}(c_n, \mathcAL{G})$. aS THe pROperty of being AcylindricaLLy hYperboLiC is STable uNder tAkINg iNfinite normAl suBgroups [@OsInAcyl lEmma 7.2], it iS SufficiEnt to sHow ThaT $\matHRm{inN}(G_n) \RtIMes \MAtHrm{lOc}(C_N, \mathcal{g})$ iS nOt acyLindRICALly hYpeRbolIc. So lEt $\iota(g) \varphi$ Be aN autOMorPhism Of thiS subGrOup, whEre $g \in g_n$ and $\VaRphi \in \mathrm{Loc}(c_n, \maThcal{G})$. For EacH cOpy $z_i$ Of $Z$, thE ReduceD woRd rEpresenTing $g$ coNTaiNs ONLY fInitely many syllablEs IN $z_i$; Let $S_i \subSet Z_i$ dENoTe THis set of SyLlaBles. cLEarly, TherE ExIsts an inFinite COlLeCtion of AuTomorpHiSms Of $Z_I$ fixiNG $S_i$ pOintwiSe; furtheRmore, WE may suppose thaT This collectioN GeNERaTEs a sUbgRoup of automOrphISms $\PHi_i \lEQ \mAthRM{Aut}(Z_I)$ whicH iS A fREe abelian group of infInIte ranK. NotiCe that $\phi(g)=g$ foR every $\phi \iN \pHI_i$. TherefOre, fOR eVEry $\psi \in \Phi_1 \timEs \cdoTs \times \Phi_N \Leq \mathrM{Loc}$, wE have
$\psi \Cdot \iota(g) \VARphi= \iota(\Psi(G)) \cdOt \pSi \vARPhI=g \cdot \psi \varpHI= G \cdoT \vArphi \psI = g \vArphi \cdOt \pSi$,
sIncE $\vaRpHi$ and $\psi$ | some condition is needed, as shownby th e e xam pl e be low.
Let $Z$ be t h e di rect sum $\bigoplus\li mits_ {p \ \t e xt {prim e}} \ma t hb b { Z}_ p$ a ndle t $ G_n$bethe gra ph product of $ n$ copies of $Z $ over the cy cle $C_n$ of le ngth $ n\ge q 5$.Weclaim that$ \mathr m{Aut}(G_ n) $ is no t acylin d r ic ally hyperbolic.
Asa c o nsequence of C orolla ry C( s tat edin the int ro ducti o n), the au t o m orp h ism group $\m athrm{Aut}( G _n) $ deco mp ose s as $\ left( \ m ath rm{Inn}(G_n ) \r times \ma thrm{L o c}(C_n, \mathca l{G})\ri ght ) \r t im es \m at h rm{ S ym }(C _ n,\mathcal {G }) $. As the p r o pert y o f be ing a cylindrically hy perb o lic is s table und er taki ng inf inite n ormal subgroups [@O sinAcyl L emm a7.2 ], it i s suffi cie ntto show that $ \ mat hr m { I nn }(G_n) \rtimes \ma th r m {L oc}(C_n, \math c al {G } )$ is no tacy lind r i cally hyp e rb olic. So let $ \ io ta (g) \va rp hi$ be a n a uto morph i sm o f this subgrou p, wh e re $g \in G_n$ and $\varphi\ in \ ma t hrm{ Loc }(C_n, \mat hcal { G})$ . Fo r e ach copy$Z_i$ o f $ Z $, the reduced word r eprese nting $g$ contains only fini t e l y many s ylla b le s in $Z_i$; let $S_i \subset Z _ i$ denot e thi s set of syllable s . Clearly , t her e e xis t s a n infinite co l l ecti on of aut omo rphisms of $Z _i$ fi xi ng $S_i$pointwis e; f ur th erm ore,w e may su pp ose t hat this collec tiongene ra te s asubgrou p o f auto mo rp hism s $ \P hi_i\leq \ma thrm{Au t}(Z_i)$whi c h is a f ree abe lian group of i nfinite ra nk . N oticet h at $\phi (g)=g$ for every $\phi\ in \Phi _i$ . The refo re, for e ver y $\ps i \ i n \Phi _1 \ti mes \ cd ots \ times \ Ph i_n \ leq \mathr m { Loc }$, w ehave
$\psi \cdot \iota(g) \v a rph i= \iota(\psi (g) ) \c d o t\ps i \ v arp hi = g \ c d ot \psi \varphi = g \cdot\v a rp hi \psi =g \v ar phi \cd ot \psi $,
s i nce $\v arphi$ an d $\psi$ | some_condition is_needed, as shown by_the example_below.
Let_$Z$ be_the_direct sum $\bigoplus\limits_{p_\ \text{prime}} \mathbb{Z}_p$_and let $G_n$ be_the graph product_of_$n$ copies of $Z$ over the cycle $C_n$ of length $n \geq 5$. We_claim_that $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$_is_not_acylindrically hyperbolic.
As a consequence of_Corollary C (stated in the_introduction), the_automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$ decomposes as $\left( \mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes_\mathrm{Loc}(C_n,_\mathcal{G}) \right) \rtimes_\mathrm{Sym}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. As the property of being acylindrically hyperbolic_is stable under taking infinite normal_subgroups [@OsinAcyl Lemma_7.2],_it_is sufficient to show_that $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is_not acylindrically hyperbolic. So let $\iota(g)_\varphi$ be an automorphism of this subgroup,_where $g \in G_n$ and $\varphi_\in \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$. For each_copy $Z_i$_of $Z$, the reduced word_representing $g$ contains_only finitely_many syllables in_$Z_i$; let $S_i \subset Z_i$ denote_this set of_syllables. Clearly, there exists an infinite_collection_of automorphisms of_$Z_i$_fixing_$S_i$ pointwise;_furthermore, we may_suppose_that this_collection_generates a subgroup of automorphisms $\Phi_i_\leq_\mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ which is a free abelian group_of infinite rank. Notice_that_$\phi(g)=g$ for every $\phi_\in \Phi_i$. Therefore, for every_$\psi \in \Phi_1 \times \cdots \times_\Phi_n \leq_\mathrm{Loc}$, we_have
$\psi \cdot \iota(g) \varphi= \iota(\psi(g)) \cdot \psi \varphi=g \cdot \psi \varphi=_g \cdot \varphi \psi = g_\varphi \cdot \psi$,
since $\varphi$_and $\psi$ |
mainly depends on the dip angle $\theta$ and the crossing angle $\xi$ which are shown in Fig. \[figure:hit\_cluster\_position\_error\]. The effect of electron diffusion is expected to be enhanced at large $\theta$ because the effect on neighboring pads increases the width of the pulse shape. The same effect is expected for $\xi$ as it approaches the angle $\left|\xi\right| = 45^\circ$ and $\left|\xi\right| = 135^\circ$ because hit clusters are formed in the plane of $\xi=0$ for row-clusters and $\xi=90^\circ$ for layer-clusters. On the other hand, saturation of $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xi>65^\circ$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at $\xi<10^\circ$ is seen which is an effect of the pad response function [@estee2019162509]. The constant components $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},z}$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{row},x}$ come from the standard deviation of the uniform distribution where the width of the distribution is the width of the pad.
The energy loss per unit length, $dE/dx$ (ADC/mm), can be calculated for each hit cluster that is used for the particle identification analysis discussed in section \[pid\]. The energy loss $dE$ is defined as the hit cluster charge $Q$ and the length $dx$ is calculated from the path length of the track in the cluster box range as shown in Fig. \[figure:clusterization\].
![Position errors of a hit cluster as functions of the dip angle $\theta$ and the crossing angle $\xi$. It is shown that $\sigma_{y}$ constantly increases as $\theta$ gets larger. In addition, $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ become larger as $\xi$ gets close to $45^\circ$. Saturation of $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xi>65^\circ$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at $\xi<10^\circ$ can be seen which is an effect of the pad response function. []{data-label="figure:hit_cluster_position_error"}](figure9cluster_covariance.pdf){width="6cm"}
Momentum reconstruction
=======================
The momentum reconstruction is performed on the hit clusters using GEN | mainly depends on the dip angle $ \theta$ and the thwart slant $ \xi$ which are shown in Fig. \[figure: hit\_cluster\_position\_error\ ]. The effect of electron dissemination is ask to be enhanced at large $ \theta$ because the impression on neighboring pad increases the width of the pulsation condition. The same impression is expected for $ \xi$ as it approaches the slant $ \left|\xi\right| = 45^\circ$ and $ \left|\xi\right| = 135^\circ$ because hit clusters are formed in the plane of $ \xi=0 $ for row - clusters and $ \xi=90^\circ$ for layer - bunch. On the other hand, saturation of $ \sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $ \xi>65^\circ$ and $ \sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at $ \xi<10^\circ$ is understand which is an effect of the pad reaction function [ @estee2019162509 ]. The changeless components $ \sigma_{\textrm{layer},z}$ and $ \sigma_{\textrm{row},x}$ come from the standard deviation of the uniform distribution where the width of the distribution is the width of the pad.
The department of energy loss per unit length, $ dE / dx$ (ADC / mm), can be calculated for each hit cluster that is use for the atom identification analysis discussed in section \[pid\ ]. The energy loss $ dE$ is defined as the reach bunch care $ Q$ and the length $ dx$ is account from the way length of the track in the cluster box range as shown in Fig. \[figure: clusterization\ ].
! [ Position errors of a reach cluster as functions of the dip angle $ \theta$ and the crossing angle $ \xi$. It is testify that $ \sigma_{y}$ constantly increases as $ \theta$ gets larger. In addition, $ \sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ and $ \sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ become larger as $ \xi$ gets near to $ 45^\circ$. Saturation of $ \sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $ \xi>65^\circ$ and $ \sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at $ \xi<10^\circ$ can be seen which is an effect of the pad response affair. [ ] { data - label="figure: hit_cluster_position_error"}](figure9cluster_covariance.pdf){width="6 cm " }
Momentum reconstruction
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The momentum reconstruction is performed on the hit bunch using GEN | malnly depends on the dip xngle $\theta$ and the crmssing angle $\xk$ which are shown in Fig. \[figuce:hir\_clusuvr\_position\_error\]. The ewfect of vlectron eiffnsion is expectev to be cuhancsf at oarge $\theta$ begause the exfect on neightofiug pads increases the width of the ptlse shspf. The same effgct ix expsbttd for $\xi$ as it approaches the anfle $\lefu|\xi\right| = 45^\circ$ and $\left|\xi\right| = 135^\circ$ because hit clusters are formfd in the poane if $\xi=0$ for rod-clusters and $\xi=90^\circ$ fkr layer-clusters. On the other hxnd, scturation od $\wigld_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xp>65^\circ$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{nayer},x}$ st $\xi<10^\circ$ is scen wiich is an effect of the 'ad response functiog [@estee2019162509]. Tha eonstant components $\sugna_{\texjrm{lafer},z}$ qnd $\sifme_{\testrm{roa},x}$ rome from tge standard deviation of the umisirm distributjon whqrq the width of the distribution is the fidfh of the pad.
The energy loss per unit length, $dE/dx$ (ADC/im), can be calculated for each hit cluster that is used wor tme pxetlcle identification analysis discussed in secejom \[ppd\]. The energy losf $dE$ is defonfd ws the hit closter ckzrfe $Q$ and the lengtj $dx$ is calcylated frjm tne path length of the track in the clusner vox range as shown in Fig. \[figuxe:clusjerizayion\].
![Position errors of c hit dluster as vunctions uf the dip angle $\thvta$ dnd the crossing angle $\xi$. Yt is shoxn thct $\sigma_{h}$ comstantjy increasfs as $\theta$ gets larger. Ln adbitiot, $\sigma_{\texhrm{layer},x}$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ bxrome larger ax $\fi$ cets clofe to $45^\circ$. Saturatyon of $\sigma_{\tertrm{row},z}$ at $\xk>65^\circ$ and $\aigma_{\teetrm{layer},x}$ ae $\xi<10^\circ$ can tg seen which ms an effqct if tye pad fdsponse functipn. []{data-laytl="figure:hir_cluster_position_ervor"}](fiehre9cluster_covarncnxe.pdf){width="6cm"}
Momrntjm webonxtwgction
=======================
The mokentjm frconsgruction is oerfprmed on the hit cluvtera using GEN | mainly depends on the dip angle $\theta$ crossing $\xi$ which shown in Fig. diffusion expected to be at large $\theta$ the effect on neighboring pads increases width of the pulse shape. The same effect is expected for $\xi$ as approaches the angle $\left|\xi\right| = 45^\circ$ and $\left|\xi\right| = 135^\circ$ because hit clusters formed the of for row-clusters and $\xi=90^\circ$ for layer-clusters. On the other hand, saturation of $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xi>65^\circ$ and at $\xi<10^\circ$ is seen which is an effect the pad response function The constant components $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},z}$ and come the standard of uniform where the width the distribution is the width of the pad. The energy loss per unit length, $dE/dx$ (ADC/mm), can calculated for cluster that used the identification analysis discussed \[pid\]. The energy loss $dE$ is hit cluster charge $Q$ and the length $dx$ calculated from path length of the track in cluster box range as shown in Fig. \[figure:clusterization\]. errors of a hit cluster as functions of the dip angle $\theta$ and the crossing It is shown that constantly increases as gets In $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ become as $\xi$ gets close to $45^\circ$. Saturation of $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xi>65^\circ$ $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at $\xi<10^\circ$ can be seen which is an effect pad function. []{data-label="figure:hit_cluster_position_error"}](figure9cluster_covariance.pdf){width="6cm"} Momentum ======================= The momentum reconstruction performed the hit clusters using | mainly depends on the dip anglE $\theta$ and tHe croSsiNg aNgLe $\xi$ WhicH are shown in Fig. \[FIgurE:hit\_cluster\_position\_errOr\]. The EfFEct oF ElEctroN diffusIOn IS ExpEcTeD to Be ENhAnced At lArge $\theTa$ because tHe eFfEct on neighboRInG pads increAseS the width of tHe pUlse shApE. ThE Same eFfeCt is eXpecteD For $\xi$ aS it approaChES the anGLe $\left|\xI\RIgHt| = 45^\ciRc$ and $\left|\xi\right| = 135^\cIRc$ BEcause hit clustErs are FoRMeD IN thE plAne of $\xi=0$ for RoW-clusTErs and $\xI=90^\CiRC$ FOr lAYer-clusters. On The other hanD, SatUratioN oF $\siGMa_{\textRm{row},Z}$ aT $\Xi>65^\cIrc$ and $\sigma_{\TextRm{layer},x}$ aT $\xi<10^\cirC$ Is seen wHIch is an Effect Of tHe pAd reSPoNsE fuNcTIon [@EStEe2019162509]. THE coNstant coMpOnEnts $\sIgma_{\TEXTRm{laYer},Z}$ and $\Sigma_{\Textrm{row},x}$ comE frOm thE StaNdard DeviaTion Of The unIform dIstriBuTion where the widTh of The distriButIoN is ThE widtH Of the pAd.
THe eNergy loSs per unIT leNgTH, $De/dX$ (ADC/mm), can be calculaTeD FOr Each hit cLuster THaT iS Used for tHe ParTiclE IDentiFicaTIoN analysiS discuSSeD iN sectioN \[pId\]. The eNeRgy LosS $dE$ is DEfinEd as thE hit clusTer chARge $Q$ and the lengTH $dx$ is calculatED fROM tHE patH leNgth of the trAck iN The cLustER bOx rANge as Shown In fIg. \[FIgure:clusterization\].
![poSition ErrorS of a hit clusteR as functioNS OF the dip aNgle $\THeTA$ and the crossinG anglE $\xi$. It is shoWN that $\sigMa_{y}$ coNstantly Increases AS $\Theta$ getS laRgeR. In AddITIoN, $\sigma_{\textrm{lAYEr},x}$ aNd $\Sigma_{\teXtrM{row},z}$ beComE laRgeR as $\Xi$ Gets close To $45^\circ$. SaTuRaTiOn Of $\sIgma_{\tEXtrm{row},z}$ At $\Xi>65^\cIrC$ anD $\sigmA_{\Textrm{Layer},X}$ at $\xI<10^\cIrC$ Can Be seen wHIcH IS an eFfEcT of tHe pAd RespoNse fUNctIon. []{data-Label="figuRe:hIT_cluStEr_PositioN_error"}](figure9cLuSter_covariAnCe.pDf){widtH="6CM"}
MomentuM reconstruction
=======================
The momenTUm reconStrUctioN is pErformed oN thE hit clUstERs usinG GEN | mainly depends on the dip angle $\t heta$ an d t he cro ssin g angle $\xi$w hich are shown in Fig. \[f igure :h i t\_c l us ter\_ positio n \_ e r ror \] .The e f fe ct of el ectrondiffusionisex pected to be en hanced atlar ge $\theta$bec ause t he ef f ect o n n eighb oringp ads in creases t he widtho f the p u l se sha pe. The same effe c ti s expected for $\xi$ a s i t app roa ches the a ng le $\ l eft|\xi \ ri g h t | = 45^\circ$ and $\left|\xi \ rig ht| =13 5^\ c irc$ b ecaus eh itclusters ar e fo rmed in t he pla n e of $\ x i=0$ fo r row- clu ste rs a n d$\ xi= 90 ^ \ci r c$ fo r la yer-clus te rs . Ontheo t h e r ha nd, sat urati on of $\sigma _{\ text r m{r ow},z }$ at $\x i> 65^\c irc$ a nd $\ si gma_{\textrm{la yer} ,x}$ at $ \xi <1 0^\ ci rc$ i s seenwhi chis an e ffect o f th ep a d r esponse function [ @e s t ee 20191625 09]. T h eco n stant co mp one nts$ \ sigma _{\t e xt rm{layer },z}$a nd $ \sigma_ {\ textrm {r ow} ,x} $ com e fro m thestandard devi a tion of the un i form distribu t io n wh e re t hewidth of th e di s trib utio n i s t h e wid th of t h ep ad.
The energy los sper un it le ngth, $dE/dx$ (ADC/mm), c a n be cal cula t ed for each hit c luste r that isu sed forthe p articleidentific a t ion anal ysi s d isc uss e d i n section \[p i d \].Th e energ y l oss $dE $ i s d efi ned a s the hit cluster c ha rg e$Q$ andt he lengt h$dx $iscalcu l ated f rom t he p at hl eng th of t h et r ackin t he c lus te r box ran g e a s shown in Fig.\[f i gure :c lu steriza tion\].
![Po si tion error sofa hitc l uster as functions of the dip a n gle $\t het a$ an d th e crossin g a ngle $ \xi $ . It i s show n tha t$\s i g ma_{y } $ c ons ta ntly incre a s esas $\ th eta$ gets l arger. In addition , $\ sigma_{\textr m{l ayer } , x} $ a n d$ \si gm a _{\ t e xtrm{row},z}$ b ecome larg er as $\xi$ get s cl os e to $4 5^\circ $. Sa t uration of $\sig ma_{\text rm {row } , z}$ at $\xi>6 5^\circ$ and $\si g ma_{\ t ex trm{l aye r},x}$ a t $ \xi<1 0^\cir c $ c an be seenwh ich is an e ff ect of t he pad response functio n. []{ data- lab el="figur e:h i t_c luster_po siti on_error"} ](f igu re9cl ust e r_cov aria n ce .pd f ){wid th=" 6 cm"}
Mom e nt umr e co nstruction= = = === ===== === = ====== ==
The momentum reco n struction is p erfo r m edont he h it clusters usin g G EN | mainly_depends on_the dip angle $\theta$_and the_crossing_angle $\xi$_which_are shown in_Fig. \[figure:hit\_cluster\_position\_error\]. The effect_of electron diffusion is_expected to be_enhanced_at large $\theta$ because the effect on neighboring pads increases the width of the_pulse_shape. The_same_effect_is expected for $\xi$ as_it approaches the angle $\left|\xi\right|_= 45^\circ$_and $\left|\xi\right| = 135^\circ$ because hit clusters are_formed_in the plane_of $\xi=0$ for row-clusters and $\xi=90^\circ$ for layer-clusters. On_the other hand, saturation of $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$_at $\xi>65^\circ$ and_$\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$_at_$\xi<10^\circ$ is seen which_is an effect of the pad_response function [@estee2019162509]. The constant components $\sigma_{\textrm{layer},z}$_and $\sigma_{\textrm{row},x}$ come from the standard deviation_of the uniform distribution where the_width of the distribution is_the width_of the pad.
The energy loss_per unit length,_$dE/dx$ (ADC/mm),_can be calculated_for each hit cluster that is_used for the_particle identification analysis discussed in section \[pid\]._The_energy loss $dE$_is_defined_as the_hit cluster charge_$Q$_and the_length_$dx$ is calculated from the path_length_of the track in the cluster box_range as shown in_Fig. \[figure:clusterization\].
![Position_errors of a hit_cluster as functions of the_dip angle $\theta$ and the crossing_angle $\xi$._It is_shown that $\sigma_{y}$ constantly increases as $\theta$ gets larger. In addition,_$\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ become larger as_$\xi$ gets close to_$45^\circ$. Saturation_of_$\sigma_{\textrm{row},z}$ at $\xi>65^\circ$_and_$\sigma_{\textrm{layer},x}$ at_$\xi<10^\circ$ can be seen which is an_effect of_the pad response function. []{data-label="figure:hit_cluster_position_error"}](figure9cluster_covariance.pdf){width="6cm"}
Momentum reconstruction
=======================
The_momentum reconstruction is performed_on_the hit clusters using GEN |
_{2^{-k} \cdot \ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for $t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$.\
**Proof** The isoperimetric inequality [@Gi 5.13, 5.14 and Inequality (5.16)] and a simple comparison with the (larger) volume of $\p B_1(0)$ give positive constants $c_n^\pm$ depending only on the dimension $n$, such that for any $p\in H$ we have $c_n^- \le Vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) \le c_n^+$. On the other hand, we have for any given $H$ and $p\in H$ that $$\frac{Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)}{Vol_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)} \ra 1\mm{ for } t \ra 0 \mm{ since }\bigcap_{t >0}\I(t/2) = \Sigma \mm{ and } Vol_n(\Sigma) = 0.$$ Compactness arguments for area minimizers analogously to those in Lemma \[copr\] then yield some $t_{n,\varpi} \in (0,1)$ such that for any $t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$ and for any point $x \in H$ $$Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi \cdot Vol_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi \cdot c_n^-.$$ This implies for $k=0$. The case $k \neq 0$ follows from scaling by $2^k$ and the scaling behaviour of $\bp$ and the volumes. Inequality can be derived in the same way.
From now on we consider a general hypersurface $H \in {\cal{H}}^n$. In particular, $H\subset M$ could be compact. We assume, as we already did on several occasions, that $M$ has been scaled by some large constant to the effect that for some $\varpi | _ { 2^{-k } \cdot \ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for $ t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$.\
* * Proof * * The isoperimetric inequality [ @Gi 5.13, 5.14 and Inequality (5.16) ] and a simple comparison with the (larger) volume of $ \p B_1(0)$ render incontrovertible constants $ c_n^\pm$ depending only on the proportion $ n$, such that for any $ p\in H$ we have $ c_n^- \le Vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) \le c_n^+$. On the other hired hand, we have for any given $ H$ and $ p\in H$ that $ $ \frac{Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1 } \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)}{Vol_n(B_{1 } \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) } \ra 1\mm { for } t \ra 0 \mm { since } \bigcap_{t > 0}\I(t/2) = \Sigma \mm { and } Vol_n(\Sigma) = 0.$$ Compactness argument for area minimizers analogously to those in Lemma \[copr\ ] then yield some $ t_{n,\varpi } \in (0,1)$ such that for any $ triiodothyronine \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$ and for any point $ x \in H$ $ $ Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1 } \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi \cdot Vol_n(B_{1 } \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi \cdot c_n^-.$$ This implies for $ k=0$. The sheath $ k \neq 0 $ follow from scaling by $ 2^k$ and the scaling behaviour of $ \bp$ and the volumes. Inequality can be derived in the same manner.
From now on we consider a cosmopolitan hypersurface $ H \in { \cal{H}}^n$. In particular, $ H\subset M$ could be compact. We bear, as we already did on respective occasions, that $ M$ has been scale by some large constant to the effect that for some $ \varpi | _{2^{-k} \cfot \ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for $t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$.\
**Proof** The msoperijetric ivequality [@Gi 5.13, 5.14 and Inequality (5.16)] qnd a simple comparison witf the (larher) volune oh $\p B_1(0)$ give positmbe consbcnts $d_k^\pm$ dzpxnding only on jhe dimensiot $n$, such that xof cny $p\in H$ we have $c_n^- \le Vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) \le c_n^+$. Pn the other hanq, we rave for any given $H$ and $p\in H$ that $$\frzc{Vol_n(\E(u/2) \cap B_{1} \setminus N_{1/2}(p) \cap H)}{Vol_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \fap J)} \ra 1\mm{ for } t \ra 0 \mm{ since }\bugca[_{r >0}\I(t/2) = \Sigma \om{ and } Vol_n(\Sigma) = 0.$$ Cojpactness arguments for area mivimizzrs analogoosmy jo those in Oemma \[bopr\] then yield some $d_{n,\varpi} \in (0,1)$ such that foc ant $t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$ and fmr any point $x \in R$ $$Vol_n(\E(t/2) \wa' B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap Y) \te \vatpi \cgot Xil_n(C_{1} \sttmmnua B_{1/2}(x) \cwp I) \ge \varpi \ddot c_n^-.$$ Thiw implies for $k=0$. The cwwe $k \neq 0$ folmows fwoi scaling by $2^k$ and the scaling behavioug of $\bp$ and the volumes. Inewuality can be derivef in the fame way.
From now on we consider a general hypersusface $F \iu {\cal{H}}^v$. Ij particular, $H\subset M$ could be compact. We asfhmt, ax we already dld on several occaxilnx, that $M$ has bgen scaled by some large condtant tj the effect trat gor some $\varpi | _{2^{-k} \cdot \ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for $t \in (0, The inequality [@Gi 5.14 and Inequality with (larger) volume of B_1(0)$ give positive $c_n^\pm$ depending only on the dimension such that for any $p\in H$ we have $c_n^- \le Vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) c_n^+$. On the other hand, we have for any given $H$ and $p\in that \cap \setminus \cap H)}{Vol_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)} \ra 1\mm{ for } t \ra 0 \mm{ since }\bigcap_{t = \Sigma \mm{ and } Vol_n(\Sigma) = 0.$$ arguments for area minimizers to those in Lemma \[copr\] yield $t_{n,\varpi} \in such for $t \in (0, and for any point $x \in H$ $$Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi \cdot \setminus B_{1/2}(x) \ge \varpi c_n^-.$$ implies $k=0$. The case 0$ follows from scaling by $2^k$ behaviour of $\bp$ and the volumes. Inequality can derived in same way. From now on we a general hypersurface $H \in {\cal{H}}^n$. In particular, M$ could be compact. We assume, as we already did on several occasions, that $M$ scaled by some large to the effect for $\varpi | _{2^{-k} \cdot \ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for $t \in (0, T_{n,\varpi})$.\
**ProOf** The IsoPerImEtriC ineQuality [@Gi 5.13, 5.14 and InEQualIty (5.16)] and a simple comparisoN with ThE (LargER) vOlume Of $\p B_1(0)$ givE PoSITivE cOnStaNtS $C_n^\Pm$ depEndIng only On the dimenSioN $n$, Such that for aNY $p\In H$ we have $c_N^- \le vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) \le C_n^+$. ON the otHeR haND, we haVe fOr any Given $H$ ANd $p\in H$ That $$\frac{VOl_N(\e(t/2) \cap B_{1} \SEtminus b_{1/2}(P) \CaP H)}{VoL_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)} \RA 1\mM{ For } t \ra 0 \mm{ since }\bIgcap_{t >0}\i(t/2) = \sIgMA \Mm{ aNd } VOl_n(\Sigma) = 0.$$ CoMpActneSS argumeNTs FOR AreA Minimizers anaLogously to tHOse In LemmA \[cOpr\] THen yieLd somE $t_{N,\VarPi} \in (0,1)$ such thaT for Any $t \in (0, t_{n,\vArpi})$ anD For any pOInt $x \in H$ $$vol_n(\E(t/2) \Cap b_{1} \seTminUS B_{1/2}(X) \cAp H) \Ge \VArpI \CdOt VOL_n(B_{1} \Setminus b_{1/2}(x) \CaP H) \ge \vArpi \CDOT C_n^-.$$ ThIs iMpliEs for $K=0$. The case $k \neq 0$ fOllOws fROm sCalinG by $2^k$ aNd thE sCalinG behavIour oF $\bP$ and the volumes. INequAlity can bE deRiVed In The saME way.
FrOm nOw oN we consIder a geNEraL hYPERsUrface $H \in {\cal{H}}^n$. In paRtICUlAr, $H\subseT M$ coulD Be CoMPact. We asSuMe, aS we aLREady dId on SEvEral occaSions, tHAt $m$ hAs been sCaLed by sOmE laRge ConstANt to The effEct that fOr somE $\Varpi | _{2^{-k} \cdot \ve}(z)\not =\emptyset $ for $t \i n(0,t_{n ,\varpi})$.\
* * Proo f** The isoperimetricinequ al i ty [ @ Gi 5.13 , 5.14a nd I neq ua li ty(5 . 16 )] an d a simple compariso n w it h the (large r )volume of$\p B_1(0)$ giv e p ositiv econ s tants $c _n^\p m$ dep e ndingonly on t he dimens i on $n$, s uc h th at for any $p\inH $w e have $c_n^-\le Vo l_ n (B _ { 1/2 }(p ) \cap H)\l e c_n ^ +$. Ont he o t her hand, we have for any gi v en$H$ an d$p\ i n H$ t hat $ $\ f rac {Vol_n(\E(t /2)\cap B_{1 } \se t minus B _ {1/2}(p ) \cap H) }{V ol_n ( B_ {1 } \ se t min u sB_{ 1 /2} (p) \cap H )} \ra1\mm { f o r }t \ ra 0 \mm{ since }\bigc ap_ {t > 0 }\I (t/2) = \S igma \ mm{ a nd } V ol_n( \S igma) = 0.$$ Co mpac tness arg ume nt s f or area minimi zer s a nalogou sly tot hos ei n Le mma \[copr\] thenyi e l dsome $t_ {n,\va r pi }\ in (0,1) $suc h th a t forany$ t\in (0,t_{n,\ v ar pi })$ and f or any p oin t $ x \in H$ $ $Vol_n (\E(t/2) \cap B_{1} \setmin u s B_{1/2}(x)\ ca p H) \ge\va rpi \cdot V ol_n ( B_{1 } \s e tm inu s B_{1 /2}(x )\ ca p H) \ge \varpi \cdo tc_n^-. $$ Th is implies f or $k=0$.T h e case $k \ne q 0 $ follows fromscali ng by $2^k $ and the scal ing beha viour of$ \ bp$ andthe vo lum es. I ne quality canb e der iv ed in t hesame wa y.
Fr omnow o n we cons ider a g en er al h ype rsurf a ce $H \i n{\c al {H} }^n$. In par ticul ar,$H \s u bse t M$ co u ld b e co mp ac t. W e a ss ume,as w e al ready d id on sev era l occ as io ns, tha t $M$ has bee nscaled byso melargec o nstant t o the effect that for s o me $\va rpi | _{2^{-k} \cdot_\ve}(z)\not=\emptyset$ for_$t \in (0, t_{n,\varpi})$.\
**Proof**_The isoperimetric_inequality [@Gi_5.13, 5.14_and_Inequality (5.16)] and_a simple comparison_with the (larger) volume_of $\p B_1(0)$_give_positive constants $c_n^\pm$ depending only on the dimension $n$, such that for any $p\in_H$_we have_$c_n^-_\le_Vol_n(B_{1/2}(p) \cap H) \le c_n^+$._On the other hand, we_have for_any given $H$ and $p\in H$ that $$\frac{Vol_n(\E(t/2)_\cap_B_{1} \setminus_B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)}{Vol_n(B_{1} \setminus B_{1/2}(p) \cap H)} \ra 1\mm{_for } t \ra 0 \mm{_since }\bigcap_{t >0}\I(t/2)_=_\Sigma_\mm{ and } Vol_n(\Sigma)_= 0.$$ Compactness arguments for area_minimizers analogously to those in Lemma \[copr\]_then yield some $t_{n,\varpi} \in (0,1)$ such_that for any $t \in (0,_t_{n,\varpi})$ and for any point_$x \in_H$ $$Vol_n(\E(t/2) \cap B_{1} _\setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap_H) \ge_\varpi \cdot Vol_n(B_{1}_\setminus B_{1/2}(x) \cap H) \ge \varpi_\cdot c_n^-.$$ This_implies for $k=0$. The case $k_\neq_0$ follows from_scaling_by_$2^k$ and_the scaling behaviour_of_$\bp$ and_the_volumes. Inequality can be derived in_the_same way.
From now on we consider a_general hypersurface $H \in_{\cal{H}}^n$._In particular, $H\subset M$_could be compact. We assume,_as we already did on several_occasions, that_$M$ has_been scaled by some large constant to the effect that for_some $\varpi |
}
\label{eq:ZECriterion} \gamma_{t}
&= \text{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma}
\rightarrow \infty} \left\{
\left|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
=0 \right\} \\
& \approx \text{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma}
\rightarrow \infty} \left\{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})
-F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma}) =0 \right\}.
\end{split}$$ Otherwise, for a sufficiently big value $T$ ($0<T<\infty$) and a small enough value $\delta$ ($0< \delta < \infty$), the absolute relative error can be greater than $\delta$, i.e. $\left|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| >\delta, \text{when } \bar{\gamma}>T$. Hence, the absolute relative error sum can’t be minimized as it approaches infinity: $\int_{0}^{\infty} \left|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
\text{d} \bar{\gamma} > \int_{T}^{\infty} \delta \text{d} \bar{\gamma} = \infty$.
Secondly, the SNR threshold should include the factor of the diversity order of general diversity systems. For example, in a Rayleigh fading channel, the CDF of SNR is $F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma}) = 1- e^{-\gamma / \bar{\gamma}}$, then $\lim_{\bar{\gamma} \rightarrow \infty }F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma})
< {\bar{\gamma}}^{-1} \gamma $ and in a Nakagami-$m$ fading channel, the CDF of SNR is given by: $F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma}) = \frac{\Gamma(m,m\gamma/\bar{\gamma | }
\label{eq: ZECriterion } \gamma_{t }
& = \text{arg } \lim_{\bar{\gamma }
\rightarrow \infty } \left\ {
\left|
\frac { \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma }) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
= 0 \right\ } \\
& \approx \text{arg } \lim_{\bar{\gamma }
\rightarrow \infty } \left\{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma })
-F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma }) = 0 \right\ }.
\end{split}$$ Otherwise, for a sufficiently big value $ T$ ($ 0 < T<\infty$) and a small enough value $ \delta$ ($ 0 < \delta < \infty$), the absolute proportional mistake can be greater than $ \delta$, i.e. $ \left|
\frac { \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma }) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| > \delta, \text{when } \bar{\gamma}>T$. Hence, the absolute proportional error union ca n’t be minimized as it approaches eternity: $ \int_{0}^{\infty } \left|
\frac { \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma }) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
\text{d } \bar{\gamma } > \int_{T}^{\infty } \delta \text{d } \bar{\gamma } = \infty$.
second, the SNR threshold should include the factor of the diversity order of cosmopolitan diversity systems. For example, in a Rayleigh fading distribution channel, the CDF of SNR is $ F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma }) = 1- e^{-\gamma / \bar{\gamma}}$, then $ \lim_{\bar{\gamma } \rightarrow \infty } F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma })
< { \bar{\gamma}}^{-1 } \gamma $ and in a Nakagami-$m$ fading channel, the CDF of SNR is given by: $ F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma }) = \frac{\Gamma(m, m\gamma/\bar{\gamma | }
\labfl{eq:ZECriterion} \gamma_{t}
&= \ttxt{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gammc}
\eightacrow \inrty} \left\{
\ueft|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamme}(\gamna_t,\bae{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\rigft|
=0 \right\} \\
& \approx \rext{erg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma}
\rmfhtarrow \inftg} \lefc\{\ber{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})
-F_{\gakma}(\gamma_t,\bdr{\gamma}) =0 \right\}.
\evd{dplit}$$ Otherwise, for a sufficiently fig valie $T$ ($0<T<\infty$) and w smsjl ehough value $\delta$ ($0< \delta < \infty$), ths absollte relative errot can be greater than $\deltw$, i.e. $\left|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\hamma}) -
F_{\gammq}(\gamiq_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\baf{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| >\delta, \text{when } \bar{\gamma}>T$. Hence, the xbsolbte relativg srgmr sum can’t be mpnimized as ib approdches imfinity: $\int_{0}^{\infby} \leht|
\frqc{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamka}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bat{P}_{f}(\bar{\gammd})}\rnght|
\text{d} \bar{\gamma} > \ibt_{R}^{\infti} \delda \tdzt{d} \bad{\gemmz} = \infhy$.
Sxcondly, the SNR threshild should include uhe dactor of the diverfiey order of general diversity systems. Fmr sxample, in a Rayleigh fqding channel, the CDF of SNR if $F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma}) = 1- e^{-\gamma / \bar{\gamma}}$, then $\lik_{\bar{\gemoa} \xlnhtafeoa \infty }F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma})
< {\bar{\gamma}}^{-1} \gamma $ whd ik a Nakagami-$m$ fabing channel, the CFF jf SNR is givgn by: $F_{\yzmja}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma}) = \vrac{\Gamia(m,m\gqmma/\bar{\gaima | } \label{eq:ZECriterion} \gamma_{t} &= \text{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma} \rightarrow \left| \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) - =0 \right\} \\ \infty} -F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma}) =0 \right\}. Otherwise, for a big value $T$ ($0<T<\infty$) and a enough value $\delta$ ($0< \delta < \infty$), the absolute relative error can be than $\delta$, i.e. $\left| \frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) - F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| >\delta, \text{when } \bar{\gamma}>T$. Hence, absolute error can’t minimized as it approaches infinity: $\int_{0}^{\infty} \left| \frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) - F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| \text{d} \bar{\gamma} > \int_{T}^{\infty} \delta \bar{\gamma} = \infty$. Secondly, the SNR threshold should the factor of the order of general diversity systems. example, a Rayleigh channel, CDF SNR is $F_{\gamma}(\gamma, = 1- e^{-\gamma / \bar{\gamma}}$, then $\lim_{\bar{\gamma} \rightarrow \infty }F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma}) < {\bar{\gamma}}^{-1} \gamma $ and in Nakagami-$m$ fading CDF of is by: \bar{\gamma}) = \frac{\Gamma(m,m\gamma/\bar{\gamma | }
\label{eq:ZECriterion} \gamma_{t}
&= \tExt{arg} \lim_{\bAr{\gamMa}
\rIghTaRrow \InftY} \left\{
\left|
\frac{ \bAR{P}_{f}(\bAr{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\Gamma})}{\BaR{p}_{f}(\baR{\GaMma})}\riGht|
=0 \righT\} \\
& \ApPROx \tExT{aRg} \lIm_{\BAr{\Gamma}
\RigHtarrow \Infty} \left\{\bAr{P}_{F}(\bAr{\gamma})
-F_{\gammA}(\GaMma_t,\bar{\gamMa}) =0 \rIght\}.
\end{split}$$ othErwise, FoR a sUFficiEntLy big Value $T$ ($0<t<\Infty$) aNd a small eNoUGh valuE $\Delta$ ($0< \deLTA < \iNfty$), The absolute relatiVE eRRor can be greateR than $\dElTA$, i.E. $\LEft|
\FraC{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gAmMa}) -
F_{\gaMMa}(\gamma_T,\BaR{\GAMma})}{\BAr{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\rIght| >\delta, \teXT{whEn } \bar{\gAmMa}>T$. hEnce, thE absoLuTE reLative error Sum cAn’t be miniMized aS It approAChes infInity: $\iNt_{0}^{\iNftY} \lefT|
\FrAc{ \Bar{p}_{f}(\BAr{\gAMmA}) -
F_{\gAMma}(\Gamma_t,\baR{\gAmMa})}{\bar{p}_{f}(\baR{\GAMMa})}\riGht|
\Text{D} \bar{\gAmma} > \int_{T}^{\infty} \DelTa \teXT{d} \bAr{\gamMa} = \infTy$.
SeCoNdly, tHe SNR tHreshOlD should include tHe faCtor of the DivErSitY oRder oF GeneraL diVerSity sysTems. For EXamPlE, IN A RAyleigh fading channEl, THE CdF of SNR iS $F_{\gammA}(\GaMmA, \Bar{\gamma}) = 1- E^{-\gAmmA / \bar{\GAMma}}$, thEn $\liM_{\BaR{\gamma} \riGhtarrOW \iNfTy }F_{\gammA}(\gAmma, \baR{\gAmmA})
< {\baR{\gammA}}^{-1} \GammA $ and in A NakagamI-$m$ fadINg channel, the CDf Of SNR is given bY: $f_{\gAMMa}(\GAmma, \Bar{\Gamma}) = \frac{\GaMma(m,M\GammA/\bar{\GAmMa | }
\label{eq:ZECriterion} \ gamma_{t}&= \t ext {ar g} \li m_{\ bar{\gamma}
\r i ghta rrow \infty} \left\{
\ left|
\ f rac{ \b ar{P} _{f}(\b a r{ \ g amm a} )-
F _{ \ ga mma}( \ga mma_t,\ bar{\gamma })} {\ bar{P}_{f}(\ b ar {\gamma})} \ri ght|
=0 \rig ht\ } \\
& \ app r ox \t ext {arg} \lim_ { \bar{\ gamma}
\r ig h tarrow \infty} \ le ft\{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{ \ ga m ma})
-F_{\gamm a}(\ga mm a _t , \ bar {\g amma}) =0\r ight\ } .
\end { sp l i t }$$ Otherwise, fo r a suffici e ntl y bigva lue $T$ ($ 0<T<\ in f ty$ ) and a sma ll e nough val ue $\d e lta$ ($ 0 < \delt a < \i nft y$) , th e a bs olu te rel a ti vee rro r can be g re aterthan $ \ d elta $,i.e. $\le ft|
\frac{ \b ar{ P}_{ f }(\ bar{\ gamma }) -
F _{\ga mma}(\ gamma _t ,\bar{\gamma})} {\ba r{P}_{f}( \ba r{ \ga mm a})}\ r ight|>\d elt a, \tex t{when} \b ar { \ g am ma}>T$. Hence, the a b s ol ute rela tive e r ro rs um can’t b e m inim i z ed as ita pp roachesinfini t y: $ \int_{0 }^ {\inft y} \l eft |
\fr a c{ \ bar{P} _{f}(\ba r{\ga m ma}) -
F_{\gam m a}(\gamma_t,\ b ar { \ ga m ma}) }{\ bar{P}_{f}( \bar { \gam ma}) } \r igh t |
\te xt{d} \ b ar { \gamma} > \int_{T}^ {\ infty} \del ta \text{d} \ bar{\gamma } = \infty$ .
S e co n dly, the SNR t hresh old should includethe f actor of the dive r s ity orde r o f g ene ral d iv ersity system s . For e xample, in a Rayl eig h f adi ngch annel, th e CDF of S NR i s$F_ {\gam m a}(\gamm a, \b ar {\g amma} ) = 1-e^{-\ gamm a/\ bar {\gamma } }$ , then $ \l im_{ \ba r{ \gamm a} \ r igh tarrow\infty }F _{\ g amma }( \g amma, \ bar{\gamma})<{\bar{\gam ma }}^ {-1} \ g a mma $ an d in a Nakagami-$m$ fad i ng chan nel , the CDF of SNR i s g iven b y:$ F_{\ga mma}(\ gamma ,\ba r { \gamm a } )= \ fr ac{\Gamma( m , m\g amma/ \b ar{\ gamma | }
\label{eq:ZECriterion} \gamma_{t}
&=_\text{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma}
\rightarrow_\infty} \left\{
\left|
\frac{ \bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
=0_\right\} \\
&_\approx_\text{arg} \lim_{\bar{\gamma}
\rightarrow_\infty}_\left\{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})
-F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma}) =0 \right\}.
_\end{split}$$ Otherwise, for_a sufficiently big value_$T$ ($0<T<\infty$) and_a_small enough value $\delta$ ($0< \delta < \infty$), the absolute relative error can be_greater_than $\delta$,_i.e._$\left|
\frac{_\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right| >\delta, \text{when }_\bar{\gamma}>T$. Hence, the absolute relative_error sum_can’t be minimized as it approaches infinity: $\int_{0}^{\infty}_\left|
\frac{_\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma}) -
F_{\gamma}(\gamma_t,\bar{\gamma})}{\bar{P}_{f}(\bar{\gamma})}\right|
\text{d} \bar{\gamma}_> \int_{T}^{\infty} \delta \text{d} \bar{\gamma} = \infty$.
Secondly, the SNR_threshold should include the factor of_the diversity order_of_general_diversity systems. For example,_in a Rayleigh fading channel, the_CDF of SNR is $F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma})_= 1- e^{-\gamma / \bar{\gamma}}$, then $\lim_{\bar{\gamma}_\rightarrow \infty }F_{\gamma}(\gamma, \bar{\gamma})
< {\bar{\gamma}}^{-1} \gamma_$ and in a Nakagami-$m$_fading channel,_the CDF of SNR is_given by: $F_{\gamma}(\gamma,_\bar{\gamma}) =_\frac{\Gamma(m,m\gamma/\bar{\gamma |
The nature of faint and fast TDEs
---------------------------------
Based on the light curve comparisons in section \[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz appears to be the second faintest and fastest among known TDEs. To better quantify this statement, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define a ‘faint and fast’ TDE as one with a peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet these criteria: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and decline timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is one of the slowest-fading TDEs, and so appears to be qualitatively different from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve rapidly in both their rise and decline phases. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after peak to measure the decline timescale, but appears to be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.
Of all optical TDEs with host galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are among only four with host masses $\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, which have more typical light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests that the fastest events may be linked to low mass SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar events can occur in more massive galaxies, and the SMBH mass we measure, $\gtrsim 10^6$, is typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019; @Mockler2019].
We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its spectroscopic properties at early times (though the strong narrow component in the Balmer lines at later times, possibly associated with an existing BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). Both are classified as TDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020 | The nature of faint and fast TDEs
---------------------------------
Based on the light curvature comparison in section \[sec: phot\ ], AT2019qiz appears to be the second faintest and fast among known TDEs. To better quantify this argument, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and specify a ‘ faint and fast ’ TDE as one with a peak black body luminosity $ \log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5 $ and exponential rise time $ t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet these standard: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and worsen timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is one of the slowest - fading TDEs, and so appears to be qualitatively unlike from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve rapidly in both their emanation and decline phase. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after flower to measure the decline timescale, but appears to be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.
Of all optical TDEs with server galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are among only four with host masses $ \log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5 $ [ @vanVelzen2020 ], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, which have more typical light curves [ @Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020 ]. This propose that the fastest events may be yoke to depleted mass SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz attest that similar events can occur in more massive galaxies, and the SMBH bulk we measure, $ \gtrsim 10 ^ 6 $, is typical of known TDEs [ @Wevers2019; @Mockler2019 ].
We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its spectroscopic place at early times (though the strong narrow component in the Balmer lines at later time, possibly consociate with an existing BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [ @Onori2019 ]). Both are classified as TDE - Bowen by @vanVelzen2020 | The nature of faint and fasu TDEs
---------------------------------
Based on thg oight rurve ckmparisovs in section \[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz eppeqrs ti be the second faintert and fadtest aming jbown TDEs. Vk bettev quahbify chms statement, we examine tve comprehensiee TBE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define w ‘faint ajd fast’ TDE as one rith a peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\dm erg}\,{\rk s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponrntial rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Fokr egents meet these cgiteria: AT2019quz, i[RF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanBelzen2020 also find that there is vo coxrelation bgcqeej the rise aid decjine timescales of TGEs (unloke SNe; @Nicholk2015). AV2019eve is one of the slowesv-fading TDEs, and so wppears tm ye qualitatively diffwrwnt ftom AD2019qiz qnd iPUF16fil, shich fvomve rapidlg in both tyeir rise and declime inases. The rejainind qvent, PTF09axc, has little data available dftsr peak to measure the eecline timescale, but appears eo be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.
Of all optical TGEs wmtf hisb gauqxj mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are amogf pnky four with hjst masses $\koh(M_*/K_\jdot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzev2020], the othsrs being AT2017eqx anf AT2018lna, whicy have mowe tupical light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. Tkis suggests that the fastest evznts msy be linked to low mass SMBKs, as lroposed by @Blagorodhuva2017. However, the zasv of AT2019qiz dtoonstrates that symilar evxnts ean occuf in more iassive gapaxies, and the SMBH mass we mgasure, $\gtrsim 10^6$, id typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019; @Mockler2019].
We also fmung that AC2019qiz ix similar to yPTF16fnl in its spectrjscopkc propertpes at eacly times (thjugh the stroth narrow com'onent in the Balner lindr at later timrs, possibly associared with an existikg BLT, sas not observeb un iPTF16fnl; @Blagproanoda2017 [@Oiori2019]). Fmth are clasvifidd xx TDE-Cowen by @vakVeuzen2020 | The nature of faint and fast TDEs on light curve in section \[sec:phot\], second and fastest among TDEs. To better this statement, we examine the comprehensive sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define a ‘faint and fast’ TDE as one with peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. events these AT2019qiz, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is of the slowest-fading TDEs, so appears to be qualitatively from and iPTF16fnl, evolve in their rise and phases. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after peak to measure the decline timescale, but to be than AT2019eve. all TDEs host galaxy mass and AT2019eve are among only four $\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, have more light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests the fastest events may be linked to low SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar events can more massive galaxies, and SMBH mass we $\gtrsim is of TDEs [@Wevers2019; We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its properties at early times (though the strong narrow component in lines later times, possibly with an existing BLR, not in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). classified TDE-Bowen | The nature of faint and fast TDes
---------------------------------
Based on tHe ligHt cUrvE cOmpaRisoNs in section \[sec:PHot\], At2019qiz appears to be the secoNd faiNtESt anD FaStest Among knOWn tdes. TO bEtTer QuANtIfy thIs sTatemenT, we examine The CoMprehensive Tde sAmple from @vAnVElzen2020, and defiNe a ‘Faint aNd FasT’ tDE as One With a Peak blACkbody LuminositY $\lOG (L/{\rm erG}\,{\Rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and eXPOnEntiAl rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. FoUR eVEnts meet these cRiteriA: At2019QiZ, IpTF16Fnl, pTF09axc, and At2019eVe. HowEVer, @vanVELzEN2020 ALso FInd that there iS no correlatIOn bEtween ThE riSE and deCline TiMEscAles of TDEs (uNlikE SNe; @NichoLl2015). AT2019evE Is one of THe sloweSt-fadiNg TdEs, And sO ApPeArs To BE quALiTatIVelY differeNt FrOm AT2019qIz anD Iptf16fnl, WhiCh evOlve rApidly in both tHeiR risE And DecliNe phaSes. THe RemaiNing evEnt, PTf09aXc, has little data AvaiLable afteR peAk To mEaSure tHE decliNe tImeScale, buT appearS To bE mORE SyMmetrical than AT2019eve.
of ALL oPtical TDes with HOsT gALaxy mass MeAsuRemeNTS, iPTF16Fnl aND At2019eve are aMong onLY fOuR with hoSt Masses $\LoG(M_*/M_\OdoT)<9.5$ [@vanVELzen2020], The othErs being aT2017eqx ANd AT2018lna, which haVE more typical lIGhT CUrVEs [@NiChoLl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. this SUggeSts tHAt The FAstesT evenTs MAy BE linked to low mass SMBhs, As propOsed bY @Blagorodnova2017. however, the CASE of AT2019qiz DemoNStRAtes that similaR evenTs can occur IN more masSive gAlaxies, aNd the SMBH MASs we measUre, $\GtrSim 10^6$, Is tYPIcAl of known TDEs [@wEVers2019; @moCkler2019].
We AlsO found tHat aT2019qIz iS siMiLar to iPTF16Fnl in its SpEcTrOsCopIc proPErties at EaRly TiMes (ThougH The strOng naRrow CoMpONenT in the BALmER LineS aT lAter TimEs, PossiBly aSSocIated wiTh an existIng blR, waS nOt ObserveD in iPTF16fnl; @BlaGoRodnova2017 [@OnoRi2019]). botH are clASSified as tDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020 | The nature of faint and fa st TDEs
-- ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- ----------
Ba s ed o n the light curve comp ariso ns in s e ct ion \ [sec:ph o t\ ] , AT 20 19 qiz a p pe ars t o b e the s econd fain tes tand fastesta mo ng known T DEs . To betterqua ntifyth iss tatem ent , weexamin e the c omprehens iv e TDE s a mple fr o m @ vanV elzen2020, and de f in e a ‘faint andfast’TD E a s one wi th a peakbl ackbo d y lumin o si t y $\l o g (L/{\rm erg }\,{\rm s}^ { -1} )<43.5 $and expone ntial r i setime $t_{\r m r} <15$d. Fo ur eve n ts meet these c riteri a:AT2 019q i z, i PTF 16 f nl, PT F09 a xc, and AT2 01 9e ve. H owev e r , @van Vel zen2 020 a lso find that th erei s n o cor relat ionbe tween the r ise a nd decline timesc ales of TDEs(un li keSN e; @N i choll2 015 ).AT2019e ve is o n e o ft h e s lowest-fading TDEs ,a n dso appea rs tob equ a litative ly di ffer e n t fro m AT 2 01 9qiz and iPTF1 6 fn l, whichev olve r ap idl y i n bot h the ir ris e and de cline phases. The re m aining event, PT F 0 9a x c, h aslittle data ava i labl e af t er pe a k tomeasu re th e decline timescale, b ut app earsto be more sy mmetricalt h a n AT2019 eve.
O f all optical T DEs w ith host g a laxy mas s mea surement s, iPTF16 f n l and AT 201 9ev e a rea m on g only four w i t h ho st masses $\ log(M_* /M_ \od ot) <9. 5$ [@vanVel zen2020] ,th eot her s bei n g AT2017 eq x a nd AT 2018l n a, whi ch ha ve m or et ypi cal lig h tc u rves [ @N icho ll2 01 9; @v anVe l zen 2020].This sugg est s tha tth e faste st events may b e linked t olow massS M BHs, asproposed by @Blagorodno v a2017.How ever, the case ofAT2 019qiz de m onstra tes th at si mi lar e vents c an oc cu r in morem a ssi ve ga la xies , and t he SMBH mass we me a sur e, $\gtrsim 1 0^6 $, i s ty pic a lo f k no w n T D E s [@Wevers2019; @Mockler2 01 9 ].
We alsof oun dthat AT 2019qiz is s i milar t o iPTF16f nl in its s pect r o sco pic proper ties atearly tim e s (th o ug h the st rong n ar row comp onenti n t he Ba lmer l in es atlater t imes, po ssibly associated withan exi sting BL R, was no t o b ser ved in iP TF16 fnl; @Blag oro dno va201 7 [ @ Onori 2019 ] ). Bo t h are cla s sified as TD E-B o w en by @vanVel z e n 202 0 | The nature_of faint_and fast TDEs
---------------------------------
Based on_the light_curve_comparisons in_section_\[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz appears_to be the_second faintest and fastest_among known TDEs._To_better quantify this statement, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define_a_‘faint and_fast’_TDE_as one with a peak_blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm_s}^{-1})<43.5$ and_exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet_these_criteria: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl,_PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there_is no correlation between the rise_and decline timescales_of_TDEs_(unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve_is one of the slowest-fading TDEs,_and so appears to be qualitatively_different from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve_rapidly in both their rise and_decline phases. The remaining event,_PTF09axc, has_little data available after peak_to measure the_decline timescale,_but appears to_be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.
Of all_optical TDEs with_host galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and_AT2019eve_are among only_four_with_host masses_$\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the_others_being AT2017eqx_and_AT2018lna, which have more typical light_curves_[@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests that the fastest_events may be linked_to_low mass SMBHs, as_proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the_case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar_events can_occur in_more massive galaxies, and the SMBH mass we measure, $\gtrsim 10^6$,_is typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019;_@Mockler2019].
We also found that_AT2019qiz is_similar_to iPTF16fnl in_its_spectroscopic properties_at early times (though the strong narrow_component in_the Balmer lines at later times,_possibly associated with an_existing_BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl;_@Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). Both are classified as_TDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020 |
_{\sigma(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+2))}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(j'+1)}i_{\sigma'(j'+2)}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2)-1)}i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\left\{\begin{aligned}&2\ln{\left(}1/\mu{\right)}+\operatorname{O}{\left(}1{\right)}\hspace{119pt}\text{if }n=2k+4,\ l'=l\text{ and }m'=0\\&\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}+m'+l'-l-k-2,k+l-l'-m'+2{\right)}+\operatorname{o}\big(\mu^{2m'}\big)\quad\text{otherwise}\end{aligned}\right\}\\
+\left\{\begin{aligned}&\operatorname{O}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if }n=2k+4\\&\operatorname{o}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if }n>2k+4,\end{aligned}\right.\end{gathered}$$ where $$\begin{gathered}
c{\left(}n,k,j',l,l',m,m'{\right)}:={\left(}-1{\right)}^{j'-m}\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}-k-1,j'-m+1{\right)}^{-1}\\
\times\frac{{\left(}j'-m{\right)}!}{m!{\left(}j'-2m{\right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2k-1{\right)}!{\left(}j'-m-m'+l-k+2{\right)}!}\,.\end{gathered}$$ Straightforward computations yield $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Step3Eq26}
\sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}(j') | _ { \sigma(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+2))}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(j'+1)}i_{\sigma'(j'+2)}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l - k+2)-1)}i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l - k+2))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\left\{\begin{aligned}&2\ln{\left(}1/\mu{\right)}+\operatorname{O}{\left(}1{\right)}\hspace{119pt}\text{if } n=2k+4,\ l'=l\text { and } m'=0\\&\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}+m'+l'-l - k-2,k+l - l'-m'+2{\right)}+\operatorname{o}\big(\mu^{2m'}\big)\quad\text{otherwise}\end{aligned}\right\}\\
+ \left\{\begin{aligned}&\operatorname{O}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if } n=2k+4\\&\operatorname{o}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if } n>2k+4,\end{aligned}\right.\end{gathered}$$ where $ $ \begin{gathered }
c{\left(}n, k, j',l, l',m, m'{\right)}:={\left(}-1{\right)}^{j'-m}\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}-k-1,j'-m+1{\right)}^{-1}\\
\times\frac{{\left(}j'-m{\right)}!}{m!{\left(}j'-2m{\right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2k-1{\right)}!{\left(}j'-m - m'+l - k+2{\right)}!}\,.\end{gathered}$$ Straightforward computations yield $ $ \begin{gathered }
\label{Step3Eq26 }
\sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}(j' ) | _{\sigla(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\timts\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigmc(2n+1))}i_{\sigme'(\sigma(2m+2))}}\sotsm\delga_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\alpoqdispoaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\siema'(j'+1)}i_{\sigmw'(j'+2)}}\dotsm\dwlta_{m_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2)-1)}i_{\sigma'(2(o'-j'+l-k+2))}}\allowdisplznbreanw\\
\times\left\{\begik{aligned}&2\ln{\laft(}1/\mu{\right)}+\operdturuame{O}{\left(}1{\right)}\hspace{119pt}\text{if }n=2k+4,\ l'=l\tevt{ and }k'=0\\&\ooeratorname{B}{\lest(}\frss{n}{2}+m'+l'-m-k-2,k+l-l'-m'+2{\right)}+\operatorname{o}\big(\mu^{2m'}\big)\qhad\text{mtherwise}\end{akigned}\right\}\\
+\left\{\begin{alignef}&\opegatorname{O}{\left(}\mu^4{\rihht)}&&\text{if }n=2j+4\\&\opewqtorname{o}{\lefg(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\teqc{if }n>2k+4,\end{aljgned}\right.\end{gathered}$$ where $$\begkn{gatkered}
c{\left(}n,j,j',o,l',m,l'{\tight)}:={\left(}-1{\rigit)}^{j'-m}\opvratorname{B}{\lenn(}\frac{n}{2}-k-1,b'-m+1{\right)}^{-1}\\
\yimes\frac{{\left(}j'-k{\rijht)}!}{m!{\oeft(}j'-2m{\right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2k-1{\rmght)}!{\left(}j'-m-m'+l-k+2{\right)}!}\,.\enq{gathered}$$ Scraightforward computqtuons iield $$\begkb{gaghedev}
\lagel{Steo3Eq26}
\aum_{\sigma\in\jathfrak{S}(j') | _{\sigma(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\ \times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+2))}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\ \times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(j'+1)}i_{\sigma'(j'+2)}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2)-1)}i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\ \times\left\{\begin{aligned}&2\ln{\left(}1/\mu{\right)}+\operatorname{O}{\left(}1{\right)}\hspace{119pt}\text{if }n=2k+4,\ l'=l\text{ and }n=2k+4\\&\operatorname{o}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if where $$\begin{gathered} \times\frac{{\left(}j'-m{\right)}!}{m!{\left(}j'-2m{\right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2k-1{\right)}!{\left(}j'-m-m'+l-k+2{\right)}!}\,.\end{gathered}$$ Straightforward computations | _{\sigma(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\tImes\delta_{i_{\Sigma'(\SigMa(2m+1))}I_{\sIgma'(\SigmA(2m+2))}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sIGma'(\sIgma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\allowDisplAyBReakS\\
\TiMes\deLta_{i_{\sigMA'(j'+1)}I_{\SIgmA'(j'+2)}}\DoTsm\DeLTa_{I_{\sigmA'(2(j'-m'+L-k+2)-1)}i_{\sigmA'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2))}}\allowDisPlAybreaks\\
\timeS\LeFt\{\begin{aliGneD}&2\ln{\left(}1/\mu{\rigHt)}+\oPeratoRnAme{o}{\Left(}1{\rIghT)}\hspaCe{119pt}\teXT{if }n=2k+4,\ l'=L\text{ and }m'=0\\&\OpERatornAMe{B}{\left(}\FRAc{N}{2}+m'+l'-l-K-2,k+l-l'-m'+2{\right)}+\operatoRNaME{o}\big(\mu^{2m'}\big)\quaD\text{oThERwISE}\enD{alIgned}\right\}\\
+\LeFt\{\begIN{aligneD}&\OpERATorNAme{O}{\left(}\mu^4{\rigHt)}&&\text{if }n=2k+4\\&\oPEraTornamE{o}{\LefT(}\Mu^4{\righT)}&&\text{If }N>2K+4,\enD{aligned}\rigHt.\enD{gathered}$$ Where $$\bEGin{gathERed}
c{\lefT(}n,k,j',l,l',M,m'{\rIghT)}:={\lefT(}-1{\RiGhT)}^{j'-m}\OpERatORnAme{b}{\LefT(}\frac{n}{2}-k-1,j'-M+1{\rIgHt)}^{-1}\\
\timEs\frAC{{\LEFt(}j'-m{\RigHt)}!}{m!{\lEft(}j'-2m{\Right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2K-1{\riGht)}!{\lEFt(}j'-M-m'+l-k+2{\rIght)}!}\,.\eNd{gaThEred}$$ STraighTforwArD computations yiEld $$\bEgin{gatheRed}
\LaBel{stEp3Eq26}
\sUM_{\sigma\In\mAthFrak{S}(j') | _{\sigma(2m)}}\allowdispla ybreaks\\\time s\d elt a_ {i_{ \sig ma'(\sigma(2m+ 1 ))}i _{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+2) )}}\d ot s m\de l ta _{i_{ \sigma' ( \s i g ma( j' -1 ))} i_ { \s igma' (\s igma(j' ))}}\allow dis pl aybreaks\\
\ t im es\delta_{ i_{ \sigma'(j'+1 )}i _{\sig ma '(j ' +2)}} \do tsm\d elta_{ i _{\sig ma'(2(j'- m' + l-k+2) - 1)}i_{\ s i gm a'(2 (j'-m'+l-k+2))}}\ a ll o wdisplaybreaks \\
\ti me s \l e f t\{ \be gin{aligne d} &2\ln { \left(} 1 /\ m u { \ri g ht)}+\operato rname{O}{\l e ft( }1{\ri gh t)} \ hspace {119p t} \ tex t{if }n=2k+ 4,\l'=l\text { and} m'=0\\& \ operato rname{ B}{ \le ft(} \ fr ac {n} {2 } +m' + l' -l- k -2, k+l-l'-m '+ 2{ \righ t)}+ \ o p e rato rna me{o }\big (\mu^{2m'}\bi g)\ quad \ tex t{oth erwis e}\e nd {alig ned}\r ight\ }\ \
+\left\{\begi n{al igned}&\o per at orn am e{O}{ \ left(} \mu ^4{ \right) }&&\tex t {if } n = 2 k+ 4\\&\operatorname{ o} { \ le ft(}\mu^ 4{\rig h t) }& & \text{if } n>2 k+4, \ e nd{al igne d }\ right.\e nd{gat h er ed }$$ whe re $$\be gi n{g ath ered} c{\l eft(}n ,k,j',l, l',m, m '{\right)}:={\ l eft(}-1{\righ t )} ^ { j' - m}\o per atorname{B} {\le f t(}\ frac { n} {2} - k-1,j '-m+1 {\ r ig h t)}^{-1}\\
\times\f ra c{{\le ft(}j '-m{\right)}! }{m!{\left ( } j '-2m{\ri ght) } !{ \ left(}n+j'-m+l '-2k- 1{\right)} ! {\left(} j'-m- m'+l-k+2 {\right)} ! } \,.\end{ gat her ed} $$S t ra ightforward c o m puta ti ons yie ld$$\begi n{g ath ere d}\l abel{Step 3Eq26}
\ su m_ {\ si gma \in\m a thfrak{S }( j') | _{\sigma(2m)}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(2m+2))}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'-1))}i_{\sigma'(\sigma(j'))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\delta_{i_{\sigma'(j'+1)}i_{\sigma'(j'+2)}}\dotsm\delta_{i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2)-1)}i_{\sigma'(2(j'-m'+l-k+2))}}\allowdisplaybreaks\\
\times\left\{\begin{aligned}&2\ln{\left(}1/\mu{\right)}+\operatorname{O}{\left(}1{\right)}\hspace{119pt}\text{if }n=2k+4,\_l'=l\text{ and_}m'=0\\&\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}+m'+l'-l-k-2,k+l-l'-m'+2{\right)}+\operatorname{o}\big(\mu^{2m'}\big)\quad\text{otherwise}\end{aligned}\right\}\\
+\left\{\begin{aligned}&\operatorname{O}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if }n=2k+4\\&\operatorname{o}{\left(}\mu^4{\right)}&&\text{if }n>2k+4,\end{aligned}\right.\end{gathered}$$ where_$$\begin{gathered}
c{\left(}n,k,j',l,l',m,m'{\right)}:={\left(}-1{\right)}^{j'-m}\operatorname{B}{\left(}\frac{n}{2}-k-1,j'-m+1{\right)}^{-1}\\
\times\frac{{\left(}j'-m{\right)}!}{m!{\left(}j'-2m{\right)}!{\left(}n+j'-m+l'-2k-1{\right)}!{\left(}j'-m-m'+l-k+2{\right)}!}\,.\end{gathered}$$ Straightforward_computations_yield $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Step3Eq26}
\sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}(j') |
renormalized. With these two assumptions we can reproduce (i) the positions of the Raman active phonons and their splitting and evolution in the (mechanically detwinned) orthorhombic antiferromagnetic state and (ii) Raman intensities, including the $\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}$ anisotropy as well as the complex resonant evolution with the laser light frequency. This agreement gives an experimental justification to the proposed computational procedure and convincingly substantiates the physical concepts it was derived from, namely the pivotal role of local moments in the lattice dynamics of Fe-based superconductors, and the importance of band renormalizations for $d$-electrons.
![(Color online) FeAs layer of and detwinning clamp. (a) The As-atoms (grey) in the center and at the edges are below and, respectively, above the Fe plane (red). For this reason, the 2Fe unit cell with the axes $a$ and $b$ (green) is determined by the As atoms. In the orthorhombic phase the Fe-Fe distances become inequivalent with the distortion strongly exaggerated here. The magnetic unit cell is twice as large as the 2Fe unit cell and has the axes $\tilde{a}$ and $\tilde{b}$. (b) Schematic sketch and (c) photograph of the detwinning clamp. The sample (4) is glued on the copper plate (1) which is in good thermal contact with the sample holder (3). Upon tightening the screws (5) the force exerted by the copper-beryllium cantilever (2) can be adjusted. (d) Schematic representation of the geometry of our Raman scattering experiment. All incoming light polarizations which are not parallel to $y$ have finite projections on the $c$ axis (red arrow).[]{data-label="fig:orth_phase"}](./Baum_fig1.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
Methods
=======
Samples {#sec:samples}
-------
The crystal was prepared using a self-flux technique. Details of the crystal growth and characterization are described elsewhere.[@Chu:2009] is a parent compound of double-layer iron-based superconductors and orders in a stripe-like spin-density-wave (SDW) below ${\ensuremath{T_\mathrm{SDW}}\xspace}\approx \mathrm{135\,K}$. Superconductivity can be obtained by substituting any of the ions or by pressure.[@Kimber:2009 | renormalized. With these two assumptions we can reproduce (i) the positions of the Raman active phonons and their splitting and development in the (mechanically detwinned) orthorhombic antiferromagnetic department of state and (ii) Raman intensities, including the $ \tilde{a}-\tilde{b}$ anisotropy equally well as the complex resonant development with the laser light frequency. This agreement gives an experimental justification to the nominate computational routine and convincingly substantiates the forcible concept it was derived from, namely the pivotal role of local consequence in the lattice dynamics of Fe - based superconductors, and the importance of isthmus renormalizations for $ d$-electrons.
! [ (Color online) FeAs layer of and detwinning clamp. (a) The As - atoms (grey) in the center and at the edges are downstairs and, respectively, above the Fe plane (red). For this reason, the 2Fe whole cell with the axes $ a$ and $ b$ (green) is determined by the As atoms. In the orthorhombic phase the Fe - Fe distance become inequivalent with the distortion strongly exaggerated here. The magnetic unit cell is doubly as large as the 2Fe unit cell and has the axes $ \tilde{a}$ and $ \tilde{b}$. (b) conventional cartoon and (coulomb) photograph of the detwinning clamp. The sample (4) is glued on the copper plate (1) which is in good thermal contact with the sample holder (3). Upon tightening the prison guard (5) the force exerted by the bull - beryllium cantilever (2) can be adjust. (d) conventional representation of the geometry of our Raman scattering experiment. All incoming light polarizations which are not parallel to $ y$ have finite projections on the $ c$ axis (red arrow).[]{data - label="fig: orth_phase"}](./Baum_fig1.pdf){width="8.5 cm " }
method
= = = = = = =
Samples { # sec: samples }
-------
The crystal was prepared using a self - flux proficiency. Details of the crystal growth and characterization are described elsewhere.[@Chu:2009 ] is a parent compound of double - layer iron - establish superconductors and orders in a stripe - like spin - density - wave (SDW) below $ { \ensuremath{T_\mathrm{SDW}}\xspace}\approx \mathrm{135\,K}$. Superconductivity can be obtained by substitute any of the ions or by pressure.[@Kimber:2009 | rejormalized. With these twu assumptions wg xan re'roduce (i) the pusitions of the Raman active pyononw and their splitting xnd evolunion in tye (mtchanically detwiihed) ortmjrhojnic autmferromagnetic xtate and (hi) Raman intenvigizs, including the $\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}$ anisotwopy as wfll as the comklex gefonahn tvolution with the laser light frsquency. This agreememt gives an experimental jkstivication to the prlposed compofatyinal procedufe and connnncingly sugstantiates the physical concepgs it was derivgb frlk, namely thx pivonal role of local momants in the lattice dnnamirs od Fe-based superconducvors, and the importagce of batd renormalizations fir $d$-enectsons.
![(Zilof ohlmne) FeAs payxr of and dstwinning coamp. (a) The As-atoms (brqj) in the centsr and ae the edges are below and, respectively, dbobe the Fe plane (red). For this reason, the 2Fe ujit cell rith the axes $a$ and $b$ (green) is determined by the Ds atkos. Nk gye orthorhombic phase the Fe-Fe distances become jntqupvalent with the bistortion stronblj rvaggerated hete. The maghetic unit cell is twice ws laege as tht 2Fe init cell and has the axes $\rilde{a}$ and $\tplde{v}$. (b) Schematic sketeh and (c) phocograpn of yhe detwinning clamp. Thz sampme (4) is gluef on the dupper plate (1) whizh ps it good thermal contact witr the sam'le hplder (3). Jpon tightqning the dcrews (5) the force exertef by jhe co[per-berylllum cantilever (2) can be adjusted. (d) Schematic rgprasettation jf thc geometry of otr Raman scattgring expzrimeng. All incojing lijht polarizaeions which asg not parallen to $y$ hwve dinire projdztions on the $v$ axis (reb arriw).[]{data-label="fig:orth_ihase"}](./Czum_fig1.pdf){width="8.5cn"}
Meuhids
=======
Samples {#sec:xamolef}
-------
Tje cwfstal was prapardd jxing x self-flux becfniqie. Details of the crfstam growth and charavtcrization are dessribed elsewhrre.[@Chu:2009] is a parent compmunv of dpubje-layer iron-based superconductkrs and ogdevs in a stripq-likc spyn-density-wcve (SDW) below ${\ensuremath{T_\mathrm{SDW}}\xspace}\epprox \mathrm{135\,K}$. Superconeuctivity can be objaiked by substmtutind any of dhe ions or by pressyre.[@Kimber:2009 | renormalized. With these two assumptions we can the of the active phonons and the detwinned) orthorhombic antiferromagnetic and (ii) Raman including the $\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}$ anisotropy as well the complex resonant evolution with the laser light frequency. This agreement gives an justification to the proposed computational procedure and convincingly substantiates the physical concepts it derived namely pivotal of local moments in the lattice dynamics of Fe-based superconductors, and the importance of band renormalizations $d$-electrons. ![(Color online) FeAs layer of and detwinning (a) The As-atoms (grey) the center and at the are and, respectively, the plane For this reason, 2Fe unit cell with the axes $a$ and $b$ (green) is determined by the As atoms. In orthorhombic phase distances become with distortion exaggerated here. The cell is twice as large as cell and has the axes $\tilde{a}$ and $\tilde{b}$. Schematic sketch (c) photograph of the detwinning clamp. sample (4) is glued on the copper plate which is in good thermal contact with the sample holder (3). Upon tightening the screws force exerted by the cantilever (2) can adjusted. Schematic of geometry of Raman scattering experiment. All incoming light polarizations which are not parallel $y$ have finite projections on the $c$ axis (red arrow).[]{data-label="fig:orth_phase"}](./Baum_fig1.pdf){width="8.5cm"} Samples ------- The crystal prepared using a self-flux Details the crystal growth and described is of iron-based and orders in a spin-density-wave (SDW) below ${\ensuremath{T_\mathrm{SDW}}\xspace}\approx \mathrm{135\,K}$. can be obtained by or by pressure.[@Kimber:2009 | renormalized. With these two aSsumptions We can RepRodUcE (i) thE posItions of the RamAN actIve phonons and their spliTting AnD EvolUTiOn in tHe (mechaNIcALLy dEtWiNneD) oRThOrhomBic AntiferRomagnetic StaTe And (ii) Raman inTEnSities, inclUdiNg the $\tilde{a}-\tIldE{b}$ anisOtRopY As welL as The coMplex rESonant Evolution WiTH the laSEr light FREqUencY. This agreement givES aN Experimental juStificAtIOn TO The ProPosed compuTaTionaL ProceduRE aND COnvINcingly substaNtiates the pHYsiCal conCePts IT was deRived FrOM, naMely the pivoTal rOle of locaL momenTS in the lATtice dyNamics Of FE-baSed sUPeRcOndUcTOrs, ANd The IMpoRtance of BaNd RenorMaliZATIOns fOr $d$-ElecTrons.
![(color online) Feas lAyer OF anD detwInninG claMp. (A) The AS-atoms (Grey) iN tHe center and at thE edgEs are beloW anD, rEspEcTivelY, Above tHe FE plAne (red). FOr this rEAsoN, tHE 2fE uNit cell with the axes $A$ aND $B$ (gReen) is deTerminED bY tHE As atoms. in The OrthORHombiC phaSE tHe Fe-Fe diStanceS BeCoMe inequIvAlent wItH thE diStortIOn stRongly ExaggeraTed heRE. The magnetic unIT cell is twice aS LaRGE aS The 2FE unIt cell and haS the AXes $\tIlde{A}$ AnD $\tiLDe{b}$. (b) SChemaTiC SkETch and (c) photograph of ThE detwiNning Clamp. The samplE (4) is glued on THE Copper plAte (1) wHIcH Is in good thermaL contAct with the SAmple holDer (3). UpOn tighteNing the scREWs (5) the forCe eXerTed By tHE CoPper-beryllium CANtilEvEr (2) can be AdjUsted. (d) SCheMatIc rEprEsEntation oF the geomEtRy Of OuR RaMan scATtering eXpEriMeNt. ALl incOMing liGht poLariZaTiONs wHich are NOt PARallEl To $Y$ havE fiNiTe proJectIOns On the $c$ aXis (red arrOw).[]{dATa-laBeL="fIg:orth_pHase"}](./Baum_fig1.pdF){wIdth="8.5cm"}
MethOdS
=======
SaMples {#sEC:Samples}
-------
THe crystal was prepared usiNG a self-fLux TechnIque. details of The CrystaL grOWth and CharacTerizAtIon ARE descRIBeD elSeWhere.[@Chu:2009] is A PAreNt comPoUnd oF double-Layer iron-based supeRConDuctors and ordErs In a sTRIpE-liKE sPIn-dEnSIty-WAVe (SDW) below ${\ensurEmath{T_\mathRm{sdW}}\Xspace}\apprOX \maThRm{135\,K}$. SupeRconducTivitY Can be obTained by sUbstitutiNg Any oF THe iOns or by preSsure.[@KimBer:2009 | renormalized. With thesetwo assump tions we ca nrepr oduc e (i) the posi t ions of the Raman active p honon sa nd t h ei r spl ittinga nd e vol ut io n i nt he (mec han icallydetwinned) or th orhombic ant i fe rromagneti c s tate and (ii ) R aman i nt ens i ties, in cludi ng the $\tild e{a}-\til de { b}$ an i sotropy a swell as the complex r e so n ant evolutionwith t he la s e r l igh t frequenc y. This agreeme n tg i v esa n experimenta l justifica t ion to th epro p osed c omput at i ona l procedure and convinci ngly s u bstanti a tes the physi cal co ncep t sit wa sd eri v ed fr o m,namely t he p ivota l ro l e o f lo cal mom entsin the lattic e d ynam i csof Fe -base d su pe rcond uctors , and t he importance o f ba nd renorm ali za tio ns for$ d$-ele ctr ons .
![(C olor on l ine )F e A slayer of and detwi nn i n gclamp. ( a) The As -a t oms (gre y) in the c enter and at the edg es are be lo w and,re specti ve ly, ab ove t h e Fe plane (red).For t h is reason, the 2Fe unit cell wi t h t h e ax es$a$ and $b$ (gr e en)is d e te rmi n ed by theAs at o ms. In the orthorho mb ic pha se th e Fe-Fe dista nces becom e i nequival entw it h the distortio n str ongly exag g erated h ere.The magn etic unit c ell is t wic e a s l arg e as the 2Fe unit c ellan d has t heaxes $\ til de{ a}$ an d$\tilde{b }$. (b)Sc he ma ti c s ketch and (c)ph oto gr aph of t h e detw innin g cl am p. The sample (4 ) is g lu ed onthe c opper pla t e ( 1) whic h is in g ood ther ma lcontact with the sam pl e holder ( 3) . U pon ti g h tening t he screws (5) the force exerted by thecopp er-beryll ium canti lev e r (2)can be adju st ed. ( d) Sc h e ma tic r epresentat i o n o f the g eome try ofour Raman scatteri n g e xperiment. Al l i ncom i n glig h tp ola ri z ati o n s which are not parallelto $y $ have fin i tepr ojectio ns on t he $c $ axis ( red arrow ).[]{data -l abel = " fig :orth_phas e"}](./B aum_fig1. p df){w i dt h="8. 5cm "}
Me th ods
==== ===
S a mpl es {# sec:sa mp les}
- ----- -
The cry stal was prepared using a sel f-flu x t echnique. De t ail s of thecrys tal growth an d c harac ter i zatio n ar e d esc r ibedelse w here.[@Ch u :2 009 ] is a parent c o m p oun d ofdou b le-lay er i ron-based superco n ductors and or ders i n a st r ipe- li ke spin-densit y-w av e (SDW) be lo w ${\ensure math{T_\ ma t hrm{S DW}}\x space} \approx \ ma t hrm{13 5\,K }$. Supercon duc ti v ity can b eo btaine d by s ubstit utinga ny o f the ions or by p ressu r e .[@Ki m ber :2009 | renormalized._With these_two assumptions we can_reproduce (i)_the_positions of_the_Raman active phonons_and their splitting_and evolution in the_(mechanically detwinned) orthorhombic_antiferromagnetic_state and (ii) Raman intensities, including the $\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}$ anisotropy as well as the complex_resonant_evolution with_the_laser_light frequency. This agreement gives_an experimental justification to the_proposed computational_procedure and convincingly substantiates the physical concepts it_was_derived from, namely_the pivotal role of local moments in the lattice_dynamics of Fe-based superconductors, and the_importance of band_renormalizations_for_$d$-electrons.
![(Color online) FeAs layer_of and detwinning clamp. (a) The_As-atoms (grey) in the center and_at the edges are below and, respectively,_above the Fe plane (red). For_this reason, the 2Fe unit_cell with_the axes $a$ and $b$_(green) is determined_by the_As atoms. In_the orthorhombic phase the Fe-Fe distances_become inequivalent with_the distortion strongly exaggerated here. The_magnetic_unit cell is_twice_as_large as_the 2Fe unit_cell_and has_the_axes $\tilde{a}$ and $\tilde{b}$. (b) Schematic_sketch_and (c) photograph of the detwinning clamp._The sample (4) is_glued_on the copper plate_(1) which is in good_thermal contact with the sample holder_(3). Upon_tightening the_screws (5) the force exerted by the copper-beryllium cantilever (2) can_be adjusted. (d) Schematic representation of_the geometry of our_Raman scattering_experiment._All incoming light_polarizations_which are_not parallel to $y$ have finite projections_on the_$c$ axis (red arrow).[]{data-label="fig:orth_phase"}](./Baum_fig1.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
Methods
=======
Samples {#sec:samples}
-------
The crystal_was prepared using a_self-flux_technique. Details of the crystal growth_and characterization are described elsewhere.[@Chu:2009] is_a parent compound of double-layer_iron-based_superconductors_and orders in a stripe-like_spin-density-wave (SDW) below ${\ensuremath{T_\mathrm{SDW}}\xspace}\approx \mathrm{135\,K}$. Superconductivity_can be obtained_by substituting any of the ions or_by_pressure.[@Kimber:2009 |
uroku 1772 (2011), 21-25.
R.J. Libera, *Some radius of convexity problems*, Duke Math. J. **31** (1964), 143–158.
M.O. Reade, *On close-to-convex univalent functions*, Michigan Math. J. **3** (1) (1955), 59–62.
M.S. Robertson, *On the theory of univalent functions*, Ann. of Math. (2) **37** (2) (1936), 374–408.
W. Rogosinski, *On the coefficients of subordinate functions*, Proc. London Math. Soc. (Ser. 2) **48** (1943), 48–82.
H.M. Srivastava, O. Altintaş and S. Kirci Serenbay, *Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of starlike functions of complex order*, Appl. Math. Lett. **24** (2011), 1359–1363.
H.M. Srivastava, Q.-H. Xu and G.-P. Wu, *Coefficient estimates for certain subclasses of spiral-like functions of complex order*, Appl. Math. Lett. **23** (2010), 763–768.
B.A. Uralegaddi, M.D. Ganigi and S.M. Sarangi, *Univalent functions with positive coefficients*, Tamkang J. Math. **25** (1994), 225–230.
W. Ul-Haq, A. Nazneen and N. Rehman, *Coefficient estimates for certain subfamilies of close-to-convex functions of complex order*, Filomat **28** (6) (2014), 1139–1142.
W. Ul-Haq, A. Nazneen, M. Arif and N. Rehman, *Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of close-to-convex functions of Janowski type*, J. Comput. Anal. Appl. **16** (1) (2014), 133–138.
---
abstract: 'In contemporary applied and computational mathematics, a frequent challenge is to bound the expectation of the spectral norm of a sum of independent random matrices. This quantity is controlled by the norm of the expected square of the random matrix and the expectation of the maximum squared norm achieved by | uroku 1772 (2011), 21 - 25.
R.J. Libera, * Some radius of convexity problems *, Duke Math. J. * * 31 * * (1964), 143–158.
M.O. Reade, * On close - to - convex monovalent function *, Michigan Math. J. * * 3 * * (1) (1955), 59–62.
M.S. Robertson, * On the theory of univalent function *, Ann. of Math. (2) * * 37 * * (2) (1936), 374–408.
W. Rogosinski, * On the coefficient of subordinate functions *, Proc. London Math. Soc. (Ser. 2) * * 48 * * (1943), 48–82.
H.M. Srivastava, O. Altintaş and S. Kirci Serenbay, * Coefficient bounds for sealed subclass of starlike functions of complex order *, Appl. Math. Lett. * * 24 * * (2011), 1359–1363.
H.M. Srivastava, Q.-H. Xu and G.-P. Wu, * Coefficient estimates for certain subclasses of coiling - like functions of complex order *, Appl. Math. Lett. * * 23 * * (2010), 763–768.
B.A. Uralegaddi, M.D. Ganigi and S.M. Sarangi, * Univalent routine with positive coefficients *, Tamkang J. Math. * * 25 * * (1994), 225–230.
W. Ul - Haq, A. Nazneen and N. Rehman, * Coefficient estimates for certain subfamilies of near - to - convex functions of complex order *, Filomat * * 28 * * (6) (2014), 1139–1142.
W. Ul - Haq, A. Nazneen, M. Arif and N. Rehman, * Coefficient bounds for sealed subclasses of close - to - convex function of Janowski type *, J. Comput. Anal. Appl. * * 16 * * (1) (2014), 133–138.
---
abstract:' In contemporaneous applied and computational mathematics, a frequent challenge is to adhere the expectation of the spectral norm of a kernel of independent random matrices. This quantity is controlled by the norm of the expected square of the random matrix and the expectation of the maximum squared norm achieved by | uronu 1772 (2011), 21-25.
R.J. Libera, *Some radims of convexity kriblems*, Duke Jath. J. **31** (1964), 143–158.
M.O. Reade, *On close-to-convex uiivaoent dunctions*, Michigan Matf. J. **3** (1) (1955), 59–62.
M.S. Robertsin, *Oi the theory of nhivalenb fundbions*, Enn. of Math. (2) **37** (2) (1936), 374–408.
W. Rogosinvki, *On the coexfkcnents of subordinate functions*, Proc. Jondon Kahh. Soc. (Ser. 2) **48** (1943), 48–82.
R.M. Sgidastzna, O. Altintaş and S. Kirci Serenbag, *Coeffpcient bounds for certain subclasses of staglikf functions of comolex order*, Qppl. Nath. Lett. **24** (2011), 1359–1363.
F.M. Srivastava, Q.-H. Xu ans G.-P. Wu, *Coefficient estimates fur cextain subclqswes mf spiral-lije fugctions of complex osder*, Apll. Math. Lett. **23** (2010), 763–768.
B.A. Urqlegaddi, M.D. Ganigi anv S.M. Sarangi, *Univalegt functimna with positive ciedficignts*, Damkxbg G. Mzti. **25** (1994), 225–230.
W. Ul-Hwq, E. Nazneen ahd N. Rehman, *Coefficient estimaues dor certain shbfamijiqs of close-to-convex functions of compleq orser*, Filomat **28** (6) (2014), 1139–1142.
W. Ul-Haq, Q. Nazneen, M. Arif and J. Rehman, *Soefficient bounds for certain subclasses of closa-to-coivdx ymkctiubs of Janowski type*, J. Comput. Anal. Appl. **16** (1) (2014), 133–138.
---
abstwzcu: 'Ik contemporary aiplied and computayilnsj mathematics, a frequeht challenge is to bound jhe expectation of yhe spectral norm of a sum if independeut eandom matrices. Thns quantity ns conjrollec by the norm of the ex'ected square of hhe randoj matrix and the dxpvctadion of ufe maximum squareq norm aciieveb by | uroku 1772 (2011), 21-25. R.J. Libera, *Some convexity Duke Math. **31** (1964), 143–158. functions*, Math. J. **3** (1955), 59–62. M.S. *On the theory of univalent functions*, of Math. (2) **37** (2) (1936), 374–408. W. Rogosinski, *On the coefficients of functions*, Proc. London Math. Soc. (Ser. 2) **48** (1943), 48–82. H.M. Srivastava, O. and Kirci *Coefficient for certain subclasses of starlike functions of complex order*, Appl. Math. Lett. **24** (2011), 1359–1363. H.M. Q.-H. Xu and G.-P. Wu, *Coefficient estimates for subclasses of spiral-like functions complex order*, Appl. Math. Lett. (2010), B.A. Uralegaddi, Ganigi S.M. *Univalent functions with coefficients*, Tamkang J. Math. **25** (1994), 225–230. W. Ul-Haq, A. Nazneen and N. Rehman, *Coefficient estimates for subfamilies of of complex Filomat (6) 1139–1142. W. Ul-Haq, M. Arif and N. Rehman, *Coefficient subclasses of close-to-convex functions of Janowski type*, J. Anal. Appl. (1) (2014), 133–138. --- abstract: 'In applied and computational mathematics, a frequent challenge is bound the expectation of the spectral norm of a sum of independent random matrices. This controlled by the norm the expected square the matrix the of the squared norm achieved by | uroku 1772 (2011), 21-25.
R.J. Libera, *Some radius of Convexity pRobleMs*, DUke maTh. J. **31** (1964), 143–158.
M.o. ReaDe, *On close-to-conVEx unIvalent functions*, MichigAn MatH. J. **3** (1) (1955), 59–62.
m.s. RobERtSon, *On The theoRY oF UNivAlEnT fuNcTIoNs*, Ann. Of MAth. (2) **37** (2) (1936), 374–408.
W. RogOsinski, *On tHe cOeFficients of sUBoRdinate funCtiOns*, Proc. LondoN MaTh. Soc. (SEr. 2) **48** (1943), 48–82.
h.M. SRIvastAva, o. AltiNtaş anD s. Kirci serenbay, *COeFFicienT Bounds fOR CeRtaiN subclasses of starLIkE Functions of comPlex orDeR*, apPL. matH. LeTt. **24** (2011), 1359–1363.
H.M. SrivasTaVa, Q.-H. XU And G.-P. Wu, *cOeFFICieNT estimates for Certain subcLAssEs of spIrAl-lIKe funcTions Of COmpLex order*, AppL. MatH. Lett. **23** (2010), 763–768.
B.A. UrAlegadDI, M.D. GaniGI and S.M. SArangi, *uniValEnt fUNcTiOns WiTH poSItIve COefFicients*, taMkAng J. MAth. **25** (1994), 225–230.
W. uL-hAQ, A. NaZneEn anD N. RehMan, *CoefficienT esTimaTEs fOr cerTain sUbfaMiLies oF close-To-conVeX functions of comPlex Order*, FiloMat **28** (6) (2014), 1139–1142.
w. UL-HaQ, A. nazneEN, M. Arif And n. ReHman, *CoeFficienT BouNdS FOR cErtain subclasses of ClOSE-tO-convex fUnctioNS oF JANowski tyPe*, j. CoMput. aNAl. AppL. **16** (1) (2014), 133–138.
---
absTRaCt: 'In contEmporaRY aPpLied and CoMputatIoNal MatHematICs, a fRequenT challenGe is tO Bound the expectATion of the specTRaL NOrM Of a sUm oF independenT ranDOm maTricES. THis QUantiTy is cOnTRoLLed by the norm of the exPeCted sqUare oF the random matRix and the eXPECtation oF the MAxIMum squared norm AchieVed by | uroku 1772 (2011), 21-25.
R.J. Libe ra, * Som e r ad iusof c onvexity probl e ms*, Duke Math. J. **31**(1964 ), 143– 1 58 .
M. O. Read e ,* O n c lo se -to -c o nv ex un iva lent fu nctions*,Mic hi gan Math. J. ** 3** (1) (1 955 ), 59–62.
M .S. Rober ts on, *On t hetheor y of u n ivalen t functio ns * , Ann. of Mat h . ( 2) * *37** (2) (1936), 37 4 –408.
W. Rogo sinski ,* On t hecoe fficientsof subo r dinatef un c t i ons * , Proc. Londo n Math. Soc . (S er. 2) * *48 * * (194 3), 4 8– 8 2.
H.M. Sriva stav a, O. Alt intaşa nd S. K i rci Ser enbay, *C oef fici e nt b oun ds for ce rta i n s ubclasse sof star like f u n ctio nsof c omple x order*, App l.Math . Le tt. * *24** (20 11 ), 13 59–136 3.
H .M . Srivastava, Q .-H. Xu and G .-P .Wu, * Coeff i cientest ima tes for certai n su bc l a s se s of spiral-like f un c t io ns of co mplexo rd er * , Appl.Ma th. Let t . **23 ** ( 2 01 0), 763– 768.
B .A .Uralega dd i, M.D .Gan igi andS .M.Sarang i, *Univ alent functions with positive coef f ic i e nt s *, T amk ang J. Math . ** 2 5**(199 4 ), 22 5 –230.
W.Ul - Ha q , A. Nazneen and N. R ehman, *Coe fficient esti mates forc e r tain sub fami l ie s of close-to-c onvex functions of compl ex or der*, Fi lomat **2 8 * * (6) (2 014 ),113 9–1 1 4 2.
W. Ul-Haq,A . Naz ne en, M.Ari f and N . R ehm an, *C oe fficientbounds f or c er ta insubcl a sses ofcl ose -t o-c onvex functi ons o f Ja no ws k i t ype*, J . C o m put. A na l. A ppl .**16* * (1 ) (2 014), 1 33–138.
--- abst ra ct : 'In c ontemporary a pp lied and c om put ationa l mathemat ics, a frequent challen g e is to bo und t he e xpectatio n o f thespe c tral n orm of a su mofi n depen d e nt ra nd om matrice s . Th is qu an tity is con trolled by the nor m of the expected sq uare o fthe ra n dom m a tri x and the expecta tion of th em ax imum squar e d n or m achie ved by | uroku 1772_(2011), 21-25.
R.J._Libera, *Some radius of_convexity problems*,_Duke_Math. J._**31**_(1964), 143–158.
M.O. Reade,_*On close-to-convex univalent_functions*, Michigan Math. J._**3** (1) (1955),_59–62.
M.S._Robertson, *On the theory of univalent functions*, Ann. of Math. (2) **37** (2) (1936),_374–408.
W._Rogosinski, *On_the_coefficients_of subordinate functions*, Proc. London_Math. Soc. (Ser. 2) **48**_(1943), 48–82.
H.M._Srivastava, O. Altintaş and S. Kirci Serenbay, *Coefficient bounds_for_certain subclasses of_starlike functions of complex order*, Appl. Math. Lett. **24**_(2011), 1359–1363.
H.M. Srivastava, Q.-H. Xu and_G.-P. Wu, *Coefficient_estimates_for_certain subclasses of spiral-like_functions of complex order*, Appl. Math._Lett. **23** (2010), 763–768.
B.A. Uralegaddi, M.D._Ganigi and S.M. Sarangi, *Univalent functions with_positive coefficients*, Tamkang J. Math. **25**_(1994), 225–230.
W. Ul-Haq, A. Nazneen_and N._Rehman, *Coefficient estimates for certain_subfamilies of close-to-convex_functions of_complex order*, Filomat_**28** (6) (2014), 1139–1142.
W. Ul-Haq, A._Nazneen, M. Arif_and N. Rehman, *Coefficient bounds for_certain_subclasses of close-to-convex_functions_of_Janowski type*,_J. Comput. Anal._Appl._**16** (1)_(2014),_133–138.
---
abstract: 'In contemporary applied and_computational_mathematics, a frequent challenge is to bound_the expectation of the_spectral_norm of a sum_of independent random matrices. This_quantity is controlled by the norm_of the_expected square_of the random matrix and the expectation of the maximum squared_norm achieved by |
\lambda(x)^{2}) - \pi_{1}\circ \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x))))(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})\right)\end{split}$$ where $\pi_{1}(\begin{bmatrix} v_{0}\\
v_{1}\end{bmatrix}) = v_{1}$. Using, and the boundedness properties of $\mathcal{K}$, we get $$||\lambda(x)^{4} \omega^{2} \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdot \lambda(x))_{1}''(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})d\omega)} \leq \frac{C}{\lambda(x) x^{2} \log^{b}(x)}$$ We use the same procedure as before to estimate the other terms arising from $\partial_{x}^{2}\left(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdot \lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2}\right)$. Finally, we note that $$|\lambda(t)^{2} \partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1})(\omega\lambda(t)^{2})| \leq C |\frac{\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}))}{\omega}| + C \lambda(t)^{3} \sqrt{\omega} |\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))(\omega\lambda(t)^{2}))|$$ and both terms on the right-hand side of the above inequality have been previously estimated. In total, we then get $$\begin{split}&||\lambda(t) \left(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}\right) \int_{t}^{\infty} dx \cos((t-x)\sqrt{\omega}) \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(t)^{2})d\omega)}\\
&\leq \frac | \lambda(x)^{2 }) - \pi_{1}\circ \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x))))(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})\right)\end{split}$$ where $ \pi_{1}(\begin{bmatrix } v_{0}\\
v_{1}\end{bmatrix }) = v_{1}$. Using, and the boundedness properties of $ \mathcal{K}$, we get $ $ ||\lambda(x)^{4 } \omega^{2 } \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot } F_{4}(x,\cdot \lambda(x))_{1}''(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})d\omega) } \leq \frac{C}{\lambda(x) x^{2 } \log^{b}(x)}$$ We use the like operation as before to estimate the early terms arise from $ \partial_{x}^{2}\left(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot } F_{4}(x,\cdot \lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2}\right)$. Finally, we notice that $ $ |\lambda(t)^{2 } \partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot } F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1})(\omega\lambda(t)^{2})| \leq C |\frac{\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot } F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}))}{\omega}| + C \lambda(t)^{3 } \sqrt{\omega } |\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot } F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))(\omega\lambda(t)^{2}))|$$ and both terms on the right - hand slope of the above inequality have been previously estimated. In total, we then catch $ $ \begin{split}&||\lambda(t) \left(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}\right) \int_{t}^{\infty } dx \cos((t - x)\sqrt{\omega }) \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(t)^{2})d\omega)}\\
& \leq \frac | \lalbda(x)^{2}) - \pi_{1}\circ \mathcal{K}(\mauhcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cbit\lambva(x))))(\omegz \lambda(b)^{2})\right)\end{split}$$ where $\pi_{1}(\begin{umateix} v_{0}\\
c_{1}\end{bmatrix}) = v_{1}$. Using, avd the bolndedness prokerties of $\mathcal{K}$, we geb $$||\lamgfa(x)^{4} \mnega^{2} \mathcal{F}(\sart{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\wdot \lambda(x))_{1}''(\omagx \pambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})d\omega)} \leq \srac{C}{\lakbfa(x) x^{2} \log^{b}(x)}$$ We use ehe aame procedure as before to estimafe the mther terms atising from $\partial_{x}^{2}\left(\mahhcap{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdot \pambda(x)))_{1}(\omegq \laivda(x)^{2}\right)$. Fivally, we note that $$|\lamgda(t)^{2} \partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(g,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1})(\omgyq\laltda(t)^{2})| \leq C |\hrac{\pagtial_{t}(\mathcal{N}(\xqrt{\cdmt} F_{4}(t,\cdpt \lambda(t)))_{1}(\omegs \lembdq(t)^{2}))}{\omega}| + C \lambda(t)^{3} \sqct{\omega} |\partial_{t}(\mathsal{F}(\sqrt{\cgoc} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))(\omega\oanbda(t)^{2}))|$$ and botf tefms oi tge rigjt-hend side of the above unequality have beem [grviously estjmated. Ig total, we then get $$\begin{split}&||\lambda(t) \ltft(\omsga \lambda(t)^{2}\right) \int_{t}^{\indty} dx \cos((t-x)\sqrt{\omega}) \mathcal{F}(\fqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambdd(t)^{2})d\omxgx)}\\
&\lew \nrac | \lambda(x)^{2}) - \pi_{1}\circ \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x))))(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})\right)\end{split}$$ where $\pi_{1}(\begin{bmatrix} = Using, and boundedness properties of \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} \lambda(x))_{1}''(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})d\omega)} \frac{C}{\lambda(x) x^{2} \log^{b}(x)}$$ use the same procedure as before estimate the other terms arising from $\partial_{x}^{2}\left(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdot \lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2}\right)$. Finally, we note $$|\lambda(t)^{2} \partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1})(\omega\lambda(t)^{2})| \leq C |\frac{\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}))}{\omega}| + C \lambda(t)^{3} |\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} \lambda(t)))(\omega\lambda(t)^{2}))|$$ both on the right-hand side of the above inequality have been previously estimated. In total, we then $$\begin{split}&||\lambda(t) \left(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}\right) \int_{t}^{\infty} dx \cos((t-x)\sqrt{\omega}) \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega &\leq \frac | \lambda(x)^{2}) - \pi_{1}\circ \mathcal{K}(\mathCal{F}(\sqrt{\cdOt}F_{4}(x,\cDot\LamBdA(x))))(\omEga \lAmbda(x)^{2})\right)\end{SPlit}$$ Where $\pi_{1}(\begin{bmatrix} v_{0}\\
v_{1}\eNd{bmaTrIX}) = v_{1}$. UsINg, And thE boundeDNeSS ProPeRtIes Of $\MAtHcal{K}$, We gEt $$||\lambdA(x)^{4} \omega^{2} \matHcaL{F}(\Sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdOT \lAmbda(x))_{1}''(\omegA \laMbda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omeGa \lAmbda(x)^{2})D\oMegA)} \Leq \frAc{C}{\LambdA(x) x^{2} \log^{B}(X)}$$ We use The same prOcEDure as BEfore to ESTiMate The other terms arisINg FRom $\partial_{x}^{2}\lefT(\mathcAl{f}(\SqRT{\CdoT} F_{4}(x,\Cdot \lambda(X)))_{1}(\oMega \lAMbda(x)^{2}\riGHt)$. fINAllY, We note that $$|\lamBda(t)^{2} \partial_{T}(\MatHcal{F}(\sQrT{\cdOT} F_{4}(t,\cdoT \lambDa(T)))_{1})(\OmeGa\lambda(t)^{2})| \leQ C |\frAc{\partial_{T}(\mathcAL{F}(\sqrt{\cDOt} F_{4}(t,\cdoT \lambdA(t)))_{1}(\oMegA \lamBDa(T)^{2}))}{\oMegA}| + C \LAmbDA(t)^{3} \SqrT{\OmeGa} |\partiaL_{t}(\MaThcal{f}(\sqrT{\CDOT} F_{4}(t,\cDot \LambDa(t)))(\omEga\lambda(t)^{2}))|$$ and BotH terMS on The riGht-haNd siDe Of the Above iNequaLiTy have been previOuslY estimateD. In ToTal, We Then gET $$\begin{SplIt}&||\lAmbda(t) \lEft(\omegA \LamBdA(T)^{2}\RIgHt) \int_{t}^{\infty} dx \cos((t-x)\SqRT{\OmEga}) \mathcAl{F}(\sqrT{\CdOt}f_{4}(X,\cdot\lamBdA(x)))_{1}(\oMega \LAMbda(x)^{2})||_{l^{2}(\rho(\OMeGa \lambda(T)^{2})d\omegA)}\\
&\LeQ \fRac | \lambda(x)^{2}) - \pi_{1} \circ \mat hcal{ K}( \ma th cal{ F}(\ sqrt{\cdot}F_{ 4 }(x, \cdot\lambda(x))))(\om ega \ la m bda( x )^ {2})\ right)\ e nd { s pli t} $$ wh er e $ \pi_{ 1}( \begin{ bmatrix} v _{0 }\ \
v_{1}\end{ b ma trix}) = v _{1 }$. Using, a ndthe bo un ded n ess p rop ertie s of $ \ mathca l{K}$, we g e t $$|| \ lambda( x ) ^{ 4} \ omega^{2} \mathca l {F } (\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}( x, \ cd o t \l amb da(x))_{1} '' (\ome g a \lamb d a( x ) ^ {2} ) ||_{L^{2}(\rh o(\omega \l a mbd a(x)^{ 2} )d\ o mega)} \leq \ f rac {C}{\lambda (x)x^{2} \lo g^{b}( x )}$$ We use the samepro ced urea sbe for et o e s ti mat e th e otherte rm s ari sing f r o m $\ par tial _{x}^ {2}\left(\mat hca l{F} ( \sq rt{\c dot}F_{4 }( x,\cd ot \la mbda( x) ))_{1}(\omega \ lamb da(x)^{2} \ri gh t)$ .Final l y, wenot e t hat $$| \lambda ( t)^ {2 } \ pa rtial_{t}(\mathcal {F } ( \s qrt{\cdo t} F_{ 4 }( t, \ cdot \la mb da( t))) _ { 1})(\ omeg a \l ambda(t) ^{2})| \l eq C |\fr ac {\part ia l_{ t}( \math c al{F }(\sqr t{\cdot} F_{4 } (t,\cdot \lamb d a(t)))_{1}(\o m eg a \l a mbda (t) ^{2}))}{\om ega} | + C \la m bd a(t ) ^{3}\sqrt {\ o me g a} |\partial_{t}(\m at hcal{F }(\sq rt{\cdot} F_{ 4}(t,\cdot \ l ambda(t) ))(\ o me g a\lambda(t)^{2 }))|$ $ and both terms on theright-ha nd side o f the abov e i neq ual ity h av e been previo u s ly e st imated. In total, we th enget $ $\begin{s plit}&|| \l am bd a( t)\left ( \omega \ la mbd a( t)^ {2}\r i ght) \ int_{ t}^{ \i nf t y}dx \cos ( (t - x )\sq rt {\ omeg a}) \ mathc al{F } (\s qrt{\cd ot}F_{4}( x,\ c dot\ la mb da(x))) _{1}(\omega \ la mbda(x)^{2 }) ||_ {L^{2} ( \ rho(\ome ga \lambda(t)^{2})d\ome g a)}\\
& \le q \fr ac | \lambda(x)^{2})_- \pi_{1}\circ_\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x))))(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})\right)\end{split}$$ where $\pi_{1}(\begin{bmatrix}_v_{0}\\
v_{1}\end{bmatrix}) =_v_{1}$._Using, and_the_boundedness properties of_$\mathcal{K}$, we get_$$||\lambda(x)^{4} \omega^{2} \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(x,\cdot_\lambda(x))_{1}''(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})d\omega)}_\leq_\frac{C}{\lambda(x) x^{2} \log^{b}(x)}$$ We use the same procedure as before to estimate the other_terms_arising from_$\partial_{x}^{2}\left(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}_F_{4}(x,\cdot_\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2}\right)$. Finally, we note_that $$|\lambda(t)^{2} \partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1})(\omega\lambda(t)^{2})|_\leq C_|\frac{\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot} F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}))}{\omega}| + C \lambda(t)^{3} \sqrt{\omega}_|\partial_{t}(\mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}_F_{4}(t,\cdot \lambda(t)))(\omega\lambda(t)^{2}))|$$ and_both terms on the right-hand side of the above_inequality have been previously estimated. In_total, we then_get_$$\begin{split}&||\lambda(t)_\left(\omega \lambda(t)^{2}\right) \int_{t}^{\infty} dx_\cos((t-x)\sqrt{\omega}) \mathcal{F}(\sqrt{\cdot}F_{4}(x,\cdot\lambda(x)))_{1}(\omega \lambda(x)^{2})||_{L^{2}(\rho(\omega \lambda(t)^{2})d\omega)}\\
&\leq \frac |
\frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\| x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{i_{k}} \right\|}}^2+\frac{1}{h}{\mbox{tr}\ensuremath{\negthickspace{\ensuremath{\left[ (I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{k}})J_{d_i} \right]}}}}\nonumber\\& \quad -\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k}})-\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k+1}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k+1}}),\label{eqn:Ld}\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathbf{x}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, $\mathbf{R}_{_k}\in{\ensuremath{\mathrm{SO(3)}}}^n$, and $\mathbf{F}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, and $\mathbf{I}\in(\Rset^{3\times 3})^n$ are defined as $\mathbf{x}_{_k}=(x_{1_k},x_{2_k},\cdots,x_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{R}_{_k}=(R_{1_k},R_{2_k},\cdots,R_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{F}_{_k}=(F_{1_k},F_{2_k},\cdots,F_{n_k})$, and $\mathbf{I}=(I_{3\times 3},I_{3\times 3},\cdots,I_{3\times 3})$, respectively.
This discrete Lagrangian is self-adjoint [@bk:hairer], and self-adjoint numerical integration methods have even order, so we are guaranteed that the resulting integration method is at least second-order accurate.
*Variations of discrete variables:* The variations of the discrete variables are chosen to respect the geometry of the configuration space ${\ensuremath{\mathrm{SE(3)}}}$. The variation of $x_{i_{k}}$ is given by $$\begin{aligned}
x_{i_{k}}^\epsilon = x_{i_{k}} + \epsilon\delta x_{i_{k}}
+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2),\end{aligned}$$ where $\delta x_{i_{k}}\in\Rset^3$ and vanishes at $k=0$ and $k=N$. The variation of | \frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\| x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{i_{k } } \right\|}}^2+\frac{1}{h}{\mbox{tr}\ensuremath{\negthickspace{\ensuremath{\left [ (I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{k}})J_{d_i } \right]}}}}\nonumber\\ & \quad -\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k}})-\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k+1}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k+1}}),\label{eqn: Ld}\end{aligned}$$ where $ \mathbf{x}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, $ \mathbf{R}_{_k}\in{\ensuremath{\mathrm{SO(3)}}}^n$, and $ \mathbf{F}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, and $ \mathbf{I}\in(\Rset^{3\times 3})^n$ are defined as $ \mathbf{x}_{_k}=(x_{1_k},x_{2_k},\cdots, x_{n_k})$, $ \mathbf{R}_{_k}=(R_{1_k},R_{2_k},\cdots, R_{n_k})$, $ \mathbf{F}_{_k}=(F_{1_k},F_{2_k},\cdots, F_{n_k})$, and $ \mathbf{I}=(I_{3\times 3},I_{3\times 3},\cdots, I_{3\times 3})$, respectively.
This discrete Lagrangian is self - adjoint [ @bk: hairer ], and self - adjoint numerical integration methods get even decree, so we are guaranteed that the resulting consolidation method is at least second - order accurate.
* Variations of discrete variable :* The variations of the discrete variables are choose to respect the geometry of the configuration space $ { \ensuremath{\mathrm{SE(3)}}}$. The pas seul of $ x_{i_{k}}$ is given by $ $ \begin{aligned }
x_{i_{k}}^\epsilon = x_{i_{k } } + \epsilon\delta x_{i_{k } }
+ \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2),\end{aligned}$$ where $ \delta x_{i_{k}}\in\Rset^3 $ and vanishes at $ k=0 $ and $ k = N$. The magnetic declination of | \frwc{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\| x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{l_{k}} \right\|}}^2+\frac{1}{h}{\mbor{rr}\ensucemath{\nsgthicksoace{\ensuremath{\left[ (I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{n}})J_{e_i} \ritht]}}}}\nonumber\\& \quad -\frac{h}{2}J(\mathbf{x}_{_{k}},\lathbf{R}_{_{k}})-\drac{i}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k+1}},\mathbf{C}_{_{i+1}}),\label{eqn:Ld}\ens{wliguev}$$ where $\mathbf{x}_{_l}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, $\mdthbf{R}_{_k}\in{\ensuramxtk{\mathrm{SO(3)}}}^n$, and $\mathbf{F}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, and $\mwthbf{I}\im(\Rdet^{3\times 3})^n$ are defpnqd aa $\mathbf{x}_{_k}=(x_{1_k},x_{2_k},\cdots,x_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{R}_{_k}=(R_{1_k},R_{2_i},\cdots,R_{i_k})$, $\mathbf{F}_{_k}=(F_{1_k},F_{2_k},\vdots,F_{n_k})$, and $\mathbf{I}=(I_{3\times 3},I_{3\tiles 3},\cdots,I_{3\times 3})$, rfspectively.
Jgis eiscrete Lagfangian is self-adjoint [@gk:hairer], and self-adjoint numerizal iutegration nerhofv have even ordeg, so we are gmsrantead that the resulting invegrqtion method is at leest second-order accutate.
*Variathous of discrete variaboew:* The varhatiubs uf uhe djscretf veriables ars chosen to respect the geometty if the confighratiog fpace ${\ensuremath{\mathrm{SE(3)}}}$. The variation mf $s_{i_{k}}$ is given by $$\begin{alugned}
x_{i_{k}}^\epsilon = x_{i_{k}} + \epsilon\dqlta x_{i_{k}}
+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2),\end{aligned}$$ where $\delta x_{i_{k}}\hn\Rsev^3$ xnd vwvusjes at $k=0$ and $k=N$. The variation of | \frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\| x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{i_{k}} \right\|}}^2+\frac{1}{h}{\mbox{tr}\ensuremath{\negthickspace{\ensuremath{\left[ (I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{k}})J_{d_i} \right]}}}}\nonumber\\& \quad $\mathbf{x}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, and $\mathbf{F}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$, $\mathbf{I}\in(\Rset^{3\times 3})^n$ are and 3},I_{3\times 3},\cdots,I_{3\times 3})$, This discrete Lagrangian self-adjoint [@bk:hairer], and self-adjoint numerical integration have even order, so we are guaranteed that the resulting integration method is least second-order accurate. *Variations of discrete variables:* The variations of the discrete variables chosen respect geometry the configuration space ${\ensuremath{\mathrm{SE(3)}}}$. The variation of $x_{i_{k}}$ is given by $$\begin{aligned} x_{i_{k}}^\epsilon = x_{i_{k}} + x_{i_{k}} +\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2),\end{aligned}$$ where $\delta x_{i_{k}}\in\Rset^3$ and vanishes at and $k=N$. The variation | \frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\| x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{I_{k}} \right\|}}^2+\fraC{1}{h}{\mboX{tr}\EnsUrEmatH{\negThickspace{\ensuREmatH{\left[ (I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{k}})J_{d_i} \right]}}}}\NonumBeR\\& \Quad -\FRaC{h}{2}U(\maThbf{x}_{_{k}},\mAThBF{r}_{_{k}})-\fRaC{h}{2}u(\maThBF{x}_{_{K+1}},\mathBf{R}_{_{K+1}}),\label{eQn:Ld}\end{aliGneD}$$ wHere $\mathbf{x}_{_k}\IN(\RSet^3)^n$, $\mathbf{r}_{_k}\iN{\ensuremath{\mAthRm{SO(3)}}}^n$, aNd $\MatHBf{F}_{_k}\iN(\RsEt^3)^n$, anD $\mathbF{i}\in(\RseT^{3\times 3})^n$ arE dEFined aS $\Mathbf{x}_{_K}=(X_{1_K},x_{2_K},\cdoTs,x_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{R}_{_k}=(R_{1_k},R_{2_k},\CDoTS,R_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{F}_{_k}=(F_{1_k},f_{2_k},\cdotS,F_{N_K})$, aND $\MatHbf{i}=(I_{3\times 3},I_{3\tiMeS 3},\cdotS,i_{3\times 3})$, rESpECTIveLY.
This discrete lagrangian iS SelF-adjoiNt [@Bk:hAIrer], anD self-AdJOinT numerical iNtegRation metHods haVE even orDEr, so we aRe guarAntEed That THe ReSulTiNG inTEgRatIOn mEthod is aT lEaSt secOnd-oRDER AccuRatE.
*VarIatioNs of discrete vAriAbleS:* the VariaTions Of thE dIscreTe variAbles ArE chosen to respecT the Geometry oF thE cOnfIgUratiON space ${\EnsUreMath{\matHrm{SE(3)}}}$. ThE VarIaTION oF $x_{i_{k}}$ is given by $$\begin{AlIGNeD}
x_{i_{k}}^\epsiLon = x_{i_{k}} + \EPsIlON\delta x_{i_{K}}
+\mAthCal{O}(\EPSilon^2),\End{aLIgNed}$$ where $\Delta x_{I_{K}}\iN\RSet^3$ and vAnIshes aT $k=0$ And $K=N$. THe varIAtioN of | \frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensurema th{\left\| x_{i _{k +1} }- x_{i _{k} } \right\|}}^2 + \fra c{1}{h}{\mbox{tr}\ensu remat h{ \ negt h ic kspac e{\ensu r em a t h{\ le ft [ ( I_ { 3\ times 3} -F_{i_{ k}})J_{d_i } \ ri ght]}}}}\non u mb er\\& \qua d - \frac{h}{2}U (\m athbf{ x} _{_ { k}},\ mat hbf{R }_{_{k } })-\fr ac{h}{2}U (\ m athbf{ x }_{_{k+ 1 } }, \mat hbf{R}_{_{k+1}}), \ la b el{eqn:Ld}\end {align ed } $$ w her e $ \mathbf{x} _{ _k}\i n (\Rset^ 3 )^ n $ , $\ m athbf{R}_{_k} \in{\ensure m ath {\math rm {SO ( 3)}}}^ n$, a nd $\m athbf{F}_{_ k}\i n(\Rset^3 )^n$,a nd $\ma t hbf{I}\ in(\Rs et^ {3\ time s 3 }) ^n$ a r e d e fi ned as$\mathbf {x }_ {_k}= (x_{ 1 _ k } ,x_{ 2_k },\c dots, x_{n_k})$, $\ mat hbf{ R }_{ _k}=( R_{1_ k},R _{ 2_k}, \cdots ,R_{n _k })$, $\mathbf{F }_{_ k}=(F_{1_ k}, F_ {2_ k} ,\cdo t s,F_{n _k} )$, and $\ mathbf{ I }=( I_ { 3 \ ti mes 3},I_{3\times3} , \ cd ots,I_{3 \times 3} )$ , respect iv ely .
T h i s dis cret e L agrangia n is s e lf -a djoint[@ bk:hai re r], an d sel f -adj oint n umerical inte g ration methods have even ord e r, s ow e ar e g uaranteed t hatt he r esul t in g i n tegra tionme t ho d is at least second -o rder a ccura te.
*Variati ons of dis c r e te varia bles : *T he variationsof th e discrete variable s are chosento respec t the geom etr y o f t hec o nf iguration spa c e ${\ en suremat h{\ mathrm{ SE( 3)} }}$ . T he variatio n of $x_ {i _{ k} }$ is give n by $$\b eg in{ al ign ed}
x _ {i_{k} }^\ep silo n=x _{i _{k}} + \e p s ilon \d el ta x _{i _{ k}}
+ \mat h cal {O}(\ep silon^2), \en d {ali gn ed }$$ whe re $\delta x_ {i _{k}}\in\R se t^3 $ andv a nishes a t $k=0$ and $k=N$. Thev ariatio n o f | \frac{1}{2h}m_i{\ensuremath{\left\|_x_{i_{k+1}}-x_{i_{k}} \right\|}}^2+\frac{1}{h}{\mbox{tr}\ensuremath{\negthickspace{\ensuremath{\left[_(I_{3\times 3}-F_{i_{k}})J_{d_i} \right]}}}}\nonumber\\& \quad_-\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k}})-\frac{h}{2}U(\mathbf{x}_{_{k+1}},\mathbf{R}_{_{k+1}}),\label{eqn:Ld}\end{aligned}$$ where_$\mathbf{x}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$,_$\mathbf{R}_{_k}\in{\ensuremath{\mathrm{SO(3)}}}^n$, and_$\mathbf{F}_{_k}\in(\Rset^3)^n$,_and $\mathbf{I}\in(\Rset^{3\times 3})^n$_are defined as_$\mathbf{x}_{_k}=(x_{1_k},x_{2_k},\cdots,x_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{R}_{_k}=(R_{1_k},R_{2_k},\cdots,R_{n_k})$, $\mathbf{F}_{_k}=(F_{1_k},F_{2_k},\cdots,F_{n_k})$, and_$\mathbf{I}=(I_{3\times 3},I_{3\times 3},\cdots,I_{3\times_3})$,_respectively.
This discrete Lagrangian is self-adjoint [@bk:hairer], and self-adjoint numerical integration methods have even order, so_we_are guaranteed_that_the_resulting integration method is at_least second-order accurate.
*Variations of discrete_variables:* The_variations of the discrete variables are chosen to_respect_the geometry of_the configuration space ${\ensuremath{\mathrm{SE(3)}}}$. The variation of $x_{i_{k}}$ is_given by $$\begin{aligned}
x_{i_{k}}^\epsilon = x_{i_{k}} +_\epsilon\delta x_{i_{k}}
+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2),\end{aligned}$$ where_$\delta_x_{i_{k}}\in\Rset^3$_and vanishes at $k=0$_and $k=N$. The variation of |
^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$
Because $f = D^{-1} g$ and $\phi_{\xi} = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \xi_i \phi_i$, the argmax can be computed explicitly as: $$h^{\star}_{\omega} = \sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{B}{\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|}\frac{\xi_i}{d_i^2} \phi_i$$ where $\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|^2 = 4\sigma^2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}$ and $\{\chi_i^2\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. samples from a chi-square distribution.
Given the argmax $h^{\star}$ and because of, we can compute the associated statistic: $$\mathbb{E}_X\Bigg(\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}^2\Bigg) = \Bigg\|\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P)} = \frac{B^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}}\sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\alpha_{i,j}^2}{d_i^4} \chi_{i}^2.$$
Variables for House Price Valuation {#table: variables descriptions}
===================================
[| p[0.50]{} | p[0.45]{} |]{} **Variable Name** & **Variable Description**\
\
Bedrooms & Number of bedrooms\
Full\_Baths & Number of bathrooms\
Last\_Sale\_Amount & Previous sale price\
SqFt & Square footage\
Stories\_Number & Number of stories\
Time\_Since\_Prior\_Sale & Time since prior sale\
Year\_Built & Year of construction\
\
Last\_Mortgage\_Amount & Amount of the mortgage of the last sale\
Last\_Mortgage\_Interest\_Rate & Interest rate of the mortgage\
\
Tax\_Amount & The Total Tax amount provided by the county or local taxing/assessment authority.\
Tax\_Assd\_Improvement\_Value | ^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$
Because $ f = D^{-1 } g$ and $ \phi_{\xi } = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty } \xi_i \phi_i$, the argmax can be computed explicitly as: $ $ h^{\star}_{\omega } = \sum_{i = 0}^{\infty } \frac{B}{\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|}\frac{\xi_i}{d_i^2 } \phi_i$$ where $ \|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|^2 = 4\sigma^2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty } \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}$ and $ \{\chi_i^2\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. samples from a chi - square distribution.
Given the argmax $ h^{\star}$ and because of, we can calculate the consociate statistic: $ $ \mathbb{E}_X\Bigg(\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}^2\Bigg) = \Bigg\|\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P) } = \frac{B^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{\infty } \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}}\sum_{i = 0}^{\infty } \frac{\alpha_{i, j}^2}{d_i^4 } \chi_{i}^2.$$
Variables for House Price Valuation { # table: variables description }
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
[ | p[0.50 ] { } | p[0.45 ] { } | ] { } * * varying Name * * & * * Variable Description**\
\
Bedrooms & Number of bedrooms\
Full\_Baths & Number of bathrooms\
Last\_Sale\_Amount & Previous sale price\
SqFt & Square footage\
Stories\_Number & Number of stories\
Time\_Since\_Prior\_Sale & Time since prior sale\
Year\_Built & Year of construction\
\
Last\_Mortgage\_Amount & Amount of the mortgage of the last sale\
Last\_Mortgage\_Interest\_Rate & Interest pace of the mortgage\
\
Tax\_Amount & The Total Tax measure provided by the county or local taxing / assessment authority.\
Tax\_Assd\_Improvement\_Value | ^{-1}\phi_{\di}.$$
Because $f = D^{-1} g$ and $\phi_{\wi} = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \xi_n \phi_i$, vhe argjax can ce computed explicitly as: $$h^{\svar}_{\onega} = \sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{B}{\|D^{-1}\phi_{\bi}\|}\frac{\xi_i}{f_i^2} \phi_i$$ qhert $\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|^2 = 4\sigma^2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \nxac{\chj_l^2}{d_i^2}$ aud $\{\chi_i^2\}_{i \in \mathnb{N}}$ are i.i.d. samples from d zhn-square distribution.
Given the argmax $h^{\star}$ snf because of, wg can somphne the associated statistic: $$\matgbb{E}_X\Bijg(\frac{\partial h^{\xtar}(X)}{\partial x_j}^2\Bigg) = \Bigg\|\fgac{\pwrtial h^{\star}(X)}{\partiwl x_j}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P)} = \frwx{B^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \wrac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}}\sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \rrac{\alpha_{i,j}^2}{d_i^4} \chi_{i}^2.$$
Variables for Housz Price Valocrioj {#table: variebles qescriptions}
===================================
[| p[0.50]{} | p[0.45]{} |]{} **Vdriable Name** & **Variablc Desrriprion**\
\
Bedrooms & Number mf bedrooms\
Full\_Batrs & Numbes kf bathrooms\
Last\_Sqlw\_Amoutt & [revkius same pdice\
SqVt & Square foktage\
Storiew\_Number & Number of xtjgoes\
Time\_Since\_Lrior\_Swlq & Time since prior sale\
Year\_Built & Year of construction\
\
Last\_Mortgate\_Amount & Amount of tje mortgade of the last sale\
Last\_Mortgage\_Interest\_Rate & Intesest cage if gye mortgage\
\
Tax\_Amount & The Total Tax amount provysec ny the county or local taximg/wsxgssment authorkty.\
Tax\_Cass\_Improvement\_Value | ^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$ Because $f = D^{-1} g$ and \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \phi_i$, the can be computed = \frac{B}{\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|}\frac{\xi_i}{d_i^2} \phi_i$$ where = 4\sigma^2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}$ $\{\chi_i^2\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. samples a chi-square distribution. Given the argmax $h^{\star}$ and because of, we can compute associated statistic: $$\mathbb{E}_X\Bigg(\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}^2\Bigg) = \Bigg\|\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P)} = \frac{B^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}}\sum_{i = \frac{\alpha_{i,j}^2}{d_i^4} Variables House Valuation {#table: variables descriptions} =================================== [| p[0.50]{} | p[0.45]{} |]{} **Variable Name** & **Variable Description**\ \ & Number of bedrooms\ Full\_Baths & Number of Last\_Sale\_Amount & Previous sale SqFt & Square footage\ Stories\_Number Number stories\ Time\_Since\_Prior\_Sale Time prior Year\_Built & Year construction\ \ Last\_Mortgage\_Amount & Amount of the mortgage of the last sale\ Last\_Mortgage\_Interest\_Rate & Interest rate of mortgage\ \ The Total amount by county or local Tax\_Assd\_Improvement\_Value | ^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$
Because $f = D^{-1} g$ and $\phi_{\xi} = \suM_{i=0}^{\infty} \xi_i \Phi_i$, tHe aRgmAx Can bE comPuted explicitlY As: $$h^{\sTar}_{\omega} = \sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{B}{\|d^{-1}\phi_{\xI}\|}\fRAc{\xi_I}{D_i^2} \Phi_i$$ wHere $\|D^{-1}\phI_{\Xi}\|^2 = 4\SIGma^2\SuM_{i=0}^{\InfTy} \FRaC{\chi_i^2}{D_i^2}$ aNd $\{\chi_i^2\}_{i \In \mathbb{N}}$ aRe i.I.d. Samples from a CHi-Square distRibUtion.
Given thE arGmax $h^{\sTaR}$ anD BecauSe oF, we caN compuTE the asSociated sTaTIstic: $$\mAThbb{E}_X\BIGG(\fRac{\pArtial h^{\star}(X)}{\partiAL x_J}^2\bigg) = \Bigg\|\frac{\paRtial h^{\StAR}(X)}{\PARtiAl x_J}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P)} = \fraC{B^2}{\Sum_{i=0}^{\iNFty} \frac{\CHi_I^2}{D_I^2}}\Sum_{I = 0}^{\Infty} \frac{\alphA_{i,j}^2}{d_i^4} \chi_{i}^2.$$
VaRIabLes for hoUse pRice VaLuatiOn {#TAblE: variables dEscrIptions}
===================================
[| p[0.50]{} | p[0.45]{} |]{} **variabLE Name** & **VaRIable DeScriptIon**\
\
bedRoomS & nuMbEr oF bEDroOMs\
fulL\_batHs & Number Of BaThrooMs\
LaST\_sALe\_AmOunT & PreVious Sale price\
SqFt & squAre fOOtaGe\
StoRies\_NUmbeR & NUmber Of storIes\
TiMe\_since\_Prior\_Sale & TIme sInce prior SalE\
YEar\_buIlt & YeAR of conStrUctIon\
\
Last\_mortgagE\_amoUnT & aMOuNt of the mortgage of tHe LASt Sale\
Last\_mortgaGE\_INtERest\_Rate & inTerEst rATE of thE morTGaGe\
\
Tax\_AmoUnt & The tOtAl tax amouNt ProvidEd By tHe cOunty OR locAl taxiNg/assessMent aUThority.\
Tax\_Assd\_iMprovement\_ValUE | ^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$
Becaus e $f = D^{ -1} g $ a nd$\ phi_ {\xi } = \sum_{i=0} ^ {\in fty} \xi_i \phi_i$, th e arg ma x can be comp uted ex p li c i tly a s: $$ h^ { \s tar}_ {\o mega} = \sum_{i = 0} ^{ \infty} \fra c {B }{\|D^{-1} \ph i_{\xi}\|}\f rac {\xi_i }{ d_i ^ 2} \p hi_ i$$ w here $ \ |D^{-1 }\phi_{\x i} \ |^2 =4 \sigma^ 2 \ su m_{i =0}^{\infty} \fra c {\ c hi_i^2}{d_i^2} $ and$\ { \c h i _i^ 2\} _{i \in \m at hbb{N } }$ arei .i . d . sa m ples from a c hi-square d i str ibutio n.
G i ven th e arg ma x $h ^{\star}$ a nd b ecause of , we c a n compu t e the a ssocia ted st atis t ic :$$\ ma t hbb { E} _X\ B igg (\frac{\ pa rt ial h ^{\s t a r } (X)} {\p arti al x_ j}^2\Bigg) =\Bi gg\| \ fra c{\pa rtial h^{ \s tar}( X)}{\p artia lx_j}\Bigg\|^2_{ L^2( P)} = \fr ac{ B^ 2}{ \s um_{i = 0}^{\i nft y}\frac{\ chi_i^2 } {d_ i^ 2 } } \s um_{i = 0}^{\infty }\ f ra c{\alpha _{i,j} ^ 2} {d _ i^4} \ch i_ {i} ^2.$ $
Vari able s f or House Price Va lu ation { #t able:va ria ble s des c ript ions}======== ===== = ============== = ======
[| p[ 0 .5 0 ] {} | p[ 0.4 5]{} |]{} * *Var i able Nam e ** &* *Vari ableDe s cr i ption**\
\
Bedrooms & Numbe r ofbedrooms\
Ful l\_Baths & N u mber ofbath r oo m s\
Last\_Sale\ _Amou nt & Previ o us saleprice \
SqFt & Square f o o tage\
St ori es\ _Nu mbe r &Number of sto r i es\Ti me\_Sin ce\ _Prior\ _Sa le& T ime s ince prio r sale\Ye ar \_ Bu ilt & Ye a r of con st ruc ti on\
\
L ast\_M ortga ge\_ Am ou n t & Amount of t he m or tg ageofth e las t sa l e\Last\_M ortgage\_ Int e rest \_ Ra te & In terest rate o fthe mortga ge \
\
Tax \ _ Amount & The Total Tax amount p r ovidedbythe c ount y or loca l t axing/ ass e ssment autho rity. \Tax \ _ Assd\ _ I mp rov em ent\_Value | ^{-1}\phi_{\xi}.$$
Because $f_= D^{-1}_g$ and $\phi_{\xi} =_\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \xi_i_\phi_i$,_the argmax_can_be computed explicitly_as: $$h^{\star}_{\omega} =_\sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{B}{\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|}\frac{\xi_i}{d_i^2}_\phi_i$$ where $\|D^{-1}\phi_{\xi}\|^2_=_4\sigma^2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}$ and $\{\chi_i^2\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. samples from a chi-square distribution.
Given the_argmax_$h^{\star}$ and_because_of,_we can compute the associated_statistic: $$\mathbb{E}_X\Bigg(\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial x_j}^2\Bigg) =_\Bigg\|\frac{\partial h^{\star}(X)}{\partial_x_j}\Bigg\|^2_{L^2(P)} = \frac{B^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{\chi_i^2}{d_i^2}}\sum_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\alpha_{i,j}^2}{d_i^4} \chi_{i}^2.$$
Variables_for_House Price Valuation_{#table: variables descriptions}
===================================
[| p[0.50]{} | p[0.45]{} |]{} **Variable Name**_& **Variable Description**\
\
Bedrooms & Number of_bedrooms\
Full\_Baths & Number_of_bathrooms\
Last\_Sale\_Amount_& Previous sale price\
SqFt_& Square footage\
Stories\_Number & Number of_stories\
Time\_Since\_Prior\_Sale & Time since prior sale\
Year\_Built_& Year of construction\
\
Last\_Mortgage\_Amount & Amount of_the mortgage of the last sale\
Last\_Mortgage\_Interest\_Rate_& Interest rate of the_mortgage\
\
Tax\_Amount &_The Total Tax amount provided_by the county_or local_taxing/assessment authority.\
Tax\_Assd\_Improvement\_Value |
indirect effects through influence cascades; 3) the Potential-Buyer Filtering is considered to derive $u$’s pricing-sensitive importance from accumulating all $u$’s direct and indirect effects on all the other potential buyers.
1. **Normalized Weight.**
By intuition, for commodity promotion, an individual $u$’s importance towards another individual $v$ can be evaluated from how much $v$’s valuation approaches the pricing due to $u$’s effect. Inspired by this intuition, PRUB+IF calculates the normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv}$, indicating $u$’s importance towards $v$’s adoption, as follows.
&\_[uv]{} =&
$$\label{E:nW}
\footnotesize
\begin{cases}
0, &\text{if } p \leq X_{A}(v) \\
\min\{1, \frac{F(w_{uv}+\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})-F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})}{ p-X_{A}(v)}\}, &\text{otherwise}
\end{cases}
,$$
where $X_{A}(v) = \chi_v+F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})$ is $v$’s valuation of the commodity under the current seed group $A$’s effects. In the case of $p \leq X_{A}(v)$, it means $v$ has adopted the commodity. So the normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv} = 0$, indicating that $u$’s importance towards $v$ is none due to no impact from $u$ on $v$’s adoption of the commodity. For the other case, the normalized weight from $u$ to $v$ is bounded by 1, and is the portion of $u$’s impact on $v$’s adoption of the commodity.
\[Ex:Wnorm\] Given the monetizing social network in Figure \[Fig:ex\] and the concave influence function $F(x)=x$, consider the promotion of a concert. Given $p= \$7$ and $A=\{\}$, no one has adopted the concert tickets. Under this condition, $X_{\{\}}(a)=\$2$ is less than the pricing of $\$7$, and the | indirect effects through influence cascades; 3) the Potential - Buyer Filtering is considered to deduce $ u$ ’s pricing - sensible importance from accumulate all $ u$ ’s direct and collateral effects on all the early potential buyers.
1. * * normalize Weight. * *
By intuition, for commodity promotion, an individual $ u$ ’s importance towards another individual $ v$ can be measure from how much $ v$ ’s valuation approaches the pricing due to $ u$ ’s impression. Inspired by this intuition, PRUB+IF calculates the normalize system of weights $ \hat{w}_{uv}$, indicating $ u$ ’s importance towards $ v$ ’s adoption, as follows.
& \_[uv ] { } = &
$ $ \label{E: nW }
\footnotesize
\begin{cases }
0, & \text{if } p \leq X_{A}(v) \\
\min\{1, \frac{F(w_{uv}+\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})-F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv }) } { p - X_{A}(v)}\ }, & \text{otherwise }
\end{cases }
, $ $
where $ X_{A}(v) = \chi_v+F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})$ is $ v$ ’s valuation of the commodity under the current seed group $ A$ ’s consequence. In the case of $ p \leq X_{A}(v)$, it means $ v$ has assume the commodity. So the normalized weight $ \hat{w}_{uv } = 0 $, indicating that $ u$ ’s importance towards $ v$ is none ascribable to no impact from $ u$ on $ v$ ’s borrowing of the commodity. For the other case, the normalized weight from $ u$ to $ v$ is bound by 1, and is the portion of $ u$ ’s impact on $ v$ ’s adoption of the commodity.
\[Ex: Wnorm\ ] Given the monetizing social network in number \[Fig: ex\ ] and the concave influence officiate $ F(x)=x$, consider the promotion of a concert. Given $ p= \$7 $ and $ A=\{\}$, no one has adopted the concert tickets. Under this condition, $ X_{\{\}}(a)=\$2 $ is less than the pricing of $ \$7 $, and the | infirect effects through ikfluence cascades; 3) the 'otentizl-Buyer Wiltering is considered to dxrivw $u$’s kgicing-sensitive imporgance frol accumuoatiig all $u$’s direct and indlxect snfectv on all the otmer potentidl buyers.
1. **Norkauived Weight.**
By intuition, for commoqity prpmltion, an indivyduak $u$’s jmportance towards another individhal $v$ cen be evaluated from how much $v$’s valuatioj aporoaches the pricijg due to $u$’w efswct. Inspired by this intuition, PRUG+IF calculates the normalized wdight $\hat{w}_{uv}$, ineixatltg $u$’s imporvance nowards $v$’s adoption, av folloes.
&\_[uv]{} =&
$$\lsben{E:nQ}
\footnotesize
\uegin{cases}
0, &\text{is } p \leq F_{A}(r) \\
\min\{1, \frac{F(w_{uv}+\sum\oinits_{i\hn \shgma(X)}q_{iv})-W(\suj\lmmifs_{i\in \digja(A)}w_{iv})}{ p-X_{A}(b)}\}, &\text{otherqise}
\end{cases}
,$$
where $X_{A}(v) = \cgi_v+F(\sui\lymits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})$ is $v$’s valuation of tve dommodity under the cureent seed group $A$’s efvects. In ehe case of $p \leq X_{A}(v)$, it means $v$ has adopted the wommovigy. Wo gye normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv} = 0$, indicating that $u$’f ikpprtance towardf $v$ is none dke jo no impact ftom $u$ ou $v$’a adoption of the fommodijy. For the othew caxe, the normalized weight frim $u$ to $v$ is vounded by 1, and is the portiou of $u$’x impsct on $v$’s adoption of tke comjodity.
\[Ed:Wnorm\] Gibdn the monetizine spchal network in Figure \[Fig:ex\] and the roncare infludnce functyon $F(x)=x$, cojsidev the promotion of w coneert. Civen $p= \$7$ ajd $A=\{\}$, no one has adopted the conrxrt tickets. Umdar nhis condntion, $W_{\{\}}(a)=\$2$ is less than the pricing oy $\$7$, and tke | indirect effects through influence cascades; 3) the is to derive pricing-sensitive importance from indirect on all the potential buyers. 1. Weight.** By intuition, for commodity promotion, individual $u$’s importance towards another individual $v$ can be evaluated from how much valuation approaches the pricing due to $u$’s effect. Inspired by this intuition, PRUB+IF the weight indicating importance towards $v$’s adoption, as follows. &\_[uv]{} =& $$\label{E:nW} \footnotesize \begin{cases} 0, &\text{if } p \leq \\ \min\{1, \frac{F(w_{uv}+\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})-F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})}{ p-X_{A}(v)}\}, &\text{otherwise} \end{cases} where $X_{A}(v) = \chi_v+F(\sum\limits_{i\in is $v$’s valuation of the under current seed $A$’s In case of $p X_{A}(v)$, it means $v$ has adopted the commodity. So the normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv} = 0$, indicating that importance towards none due no from on $v$’s adoption commodity. For the other case, the $u$ to $v$ is bounded by 1, and the portion $u$’s impact on $v$’s adoption of commodity. \[Ex:Wnorm\] Given the monetizing social network in \[Fig:ex\] and the concave influence function $F(x)=x$, consider the promotion of a concert. Given $p= $A=\{\}$, no one has the concert tickets. this $X_{\{\}}(a)=\$2$ less the pricing $\$7$, and the | indirect effects through infLuence cascAdes; 3) tHe POteNtIal-BUyer filtering is conSIderEd to derive $u$’s pricing-senSitivE iMPortANcE from AccumulATiNG All $U$’s DiRecT aND iNdireCt eFfects oN all the othEr pOtEntial buyers.
1. **nOrMalized WeiGht.**
by intuition, fOr cOmmodiTy ProMOtion, An iNdiviDual $u$’s IMportaNce towardS aNOther iNDividuaL $V$ CaN be eValuated from how muCH $v$’S Valuation approAches tHe PRiCINg dUe tO $u$’s effect. INsPired BY this inTUiTION, PRub+IF calculates The normalizED weIght $\haT{w}_{Uv}$, iNDicatiNg $u$’s iMpORtaNce towards $v$’S adoPtion, as foLlows.
&\_[uV]{} =&
$$\Label{E:nw}
\FootnotEsize
\bEgiN{caSes}
0, &\tEXt{If } P \leQ X_{a}(V) \\
\miN\{1, \FrAc{F(W_{Uv}+\sUm\limits_{I\iN \sIgma(A)}W_{iv})-F(\SUM\LImitS_{i\iN \sigMa(A)}w_{iV})}{ p-X_{A}(v)}\}, &\text{otheRwiSe}
\enD{CasEs}
,$$
wheRe $X_{A}(v) = \Chi_v+f(\sUm\limIts_{i\in \Sigma(a)}w_{Iv})$ is $v$’s valuation Of thE commoditY unDeR thE cUrrenT Seed grOup $a$’s eFfects. IN the casE Of $p \LeQ x_{a}(V)$, iT means $v$ has adopted tHe COMmOdity. So tHe normALiZeD Weight $\haT{w}_{Uv} = 0$, iNdicATIng thAt $u$’s IMpOrtance tOwards $V$ Is NoNe due to No Impact FrOm $u$ On $v$’S adopTIon oF the coMmodity. FOr the OTher case, the norMAlized weight fROm $U$ TO $v$ IS bouNdeD by 1, and is the PortIOn of $U$’s imPAcT on $V$’S adopTion oF tHE cOMmodity.
\[Ex:Wnorm\] Given ThE monetIzing Social network In Figure \[FiG:EX\] And the coNcavE InFLuence function $f(x)=x$, coNsider the pROmotion oF a conCert. GiveN $p= \$7$ and $A=\{\}$, no oNE Has adoptEd tHe cOncErt TICkEts. Under this cONDitiOn, $x_{\{\}}(a)=\$2$ is lesS thAn the prIciNg oF $\$7$, anD thE | indirect effects throughinfluencecasca des ; 3 )thePote ntial-Buyer Fi l teri ng is considered to de rive$u $ ’s p r ic ing-s ensitiv e i m p ort an ce fr om ac cumul ati ng all$u$’s dire ctan d indirect e f fe cts on all th e other pote nti al buy er s.1. * *No rmali zed We i ght.**
Byin t uition , for co m m od itypromotion, an ind i vi d ual $u$’s impo rtance t o wa r d s a not her indivi du al $v $ can be ev a l u ate d from how muc h $v$’s val u ati on app ro ach e s theprici ng due to $u$’s e ffec t. Inspir ed byt his int u ition,PRUB+I F c alc ulat e sth e n or m ali z ed we i ght $\hat{w }_ {u v}$,indi c a t i ng $ u$’ s im porta nce towards $ v$’ s ad o pti on, a s fol lows .
&\_[uv ]{} = &
$$\label{E :nW}
\foo tno te siz e \ b egin{c ase s} 0,&\text{ i f } p \ l eq X_{A}(v) \\
\ mi n \ {1 , \frac{ F(w_{u v }+ \s u m\limits _{ i\i n \s i g ma(A) }w_{ i v} )-F(\sum \limit s _{ i\ in \sig ma (A)}w_ {i v}) }{p-X_{ A }(v) }\}, & \text{ot herwi s e}
\end{ca s es}
,$$
w h er e $X_ {A} (v) = \chi_ v+F( \ sum\ limi t s_ {i\ i n \si gma(A )} w _{ i v})$ is $v$’s valua ti on ofthe c ommodity unde r the curr e n t seed gr oup$ A$ ’ s effects. Inthe c ase of $p\ leq X_{A }(v)$ , it mea ns $v$ ha s adoptedthe co mmo dit y . S o the normali z e d we ig ht $\ha t{w }_{uv}= 0 $,ind ica ti ng that $ u$’s imp or ta nc etow ards$ v$ is no ne du etono im p act fr om $u $ on $ v$ ’ s a doption of t he c om mo dity . F or theothe r ca se, the normaliz edw eigh tfr om $u$to $v$ is bou nd ed by 1, a nd is the p o r tion of$u$’s impact on $v$’s a d optionofthe c ommo dity.
\ [Ex:Wn orm \ ] Give n themonet iz ing s ocial n et wor kin Figure\ [ Fig :ex\] a nd t he conc ave influence func t ion $F(x)=x$, co nsi dert h epro m ot i onof a c o n cert. Given $p= \$7$ and$A = \{ \}$, no on e ha sadopted the co ncert tickets . Under t his condi ti on,$ X _{\ {\}}(a)=\$ 2$ is le ss than t h e pri c in g of$\$ 7$, an dthe | indirect_effects through_influence cascades; 3) the_Potential-Buyer Filtering_is_considered to_derive_$u$’s pricing-sensitive importance_from accumulating all_$u$’s direct and indirect_effects on all_the_other potential buyers.
1. **Normalized Weight.**
By intuition, for commodity promotion,_an_individual $u$’s_importance_towards_another individual $v$ can be_evaluated from how much $v$’s_valuation approaches_the pricing due to $u$’s effect. Inspired by_this_intuition, PRUB+IF calculates_the normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv}$, indicating $u$’s importance towards $v$’s_adoption, as follows.
_&\_[uv]{} =&
___$$\label{E:nW}
_\footnotesize
\begin{cases}
_ 0, &\text{if } p_\leq X_{A}(v) \\
\min\{1,_\frac{F(w_{uv}+\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})-F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})}{ p-X_{A}(v)}\}, &\text{otherwise}
_ \end{cases}
_,$$
_ where $X_{A}(v) =_\chi_v+F(\sum\limits_{i\in \sigma(A)}w_{iv})$ is_$v$’s valuation_of the commodity_under the current seed group $A$’s_effects. In the_case of $p \leq X_{A}(v)$, it_means_$v$ has adopted_the_commodity._So the_normalized weight $\hat{w}_{uv}_=_0$, indicating_that_$u$’s importance towards $v$ is none_due_to no impact from $u$ on $v$’s_adoption of the commodity._For_the other case, the_normalized weight from $u$ to_$v$ is bounded by 1, and_is the_portion of_$u$’s impact on $v$’s adoption of the commodity.
_\[Ex:Wnorm\] Given the monetizing social network_in Figure \[Fig:ex\] and the_concave influence_function_$F(x)=x$, consider the_promotion_of a_concert. Given $p= \$7$ and $A=\{\}$, no_one has_adopted the concert tickets. Under this_condition, $X_{\{\}}(a)=\$2$ is less_than_the pricing of $\$7$, and the |
$x\ge0$ and $p(x)\le0$, then $x\le r_2$. Taking $w=r_2$, we conclude that $\mu(V)\le w$, and we have the formula . It is easy to see that $w$ is a continuous function of $m_1$, $m_2$ and $\delta$.
\[lem:stepII\] Let $c<d$ be real numbers. For matrices $a_1$ and $a_2$, consider the maps ${{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\mathbb{C}\langle x_1,x_2\rangle\to\mathbb{C}$. Then we have $$\label{eq:kers}
\bigcap_{\substack{
N\in{\mathbb{N}}\\
a_1,a_2\in \mathbb{M}_N(\mathbb{C})_{sa} \\
c1\le a_i\le d1,\,(i=1,2)}}
\ker({{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2})
=\mathcal{I}.$$
The inclusion $\supseteq$ in follows from the trace property.
Let $c<u<v<d$ and make the choice of polynomials $\tilde T_i$ and $\tilde U_i$ described in Corollary \[cor:MS\]. Letting $\Xi$ and $\mathcal{J}$ be as in Lemm \[lem:Ponto\], for each $y\in\mathcal{J}\backslash\{0\}$, we will find matrices $a_1$ and $a_2$ such that $$\label{eq:Tr0}
{{\mathrm{Tr}}}({{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}(y))\ne0.$$ By and of Lemma \[lem:Ponto\], this will suffice to show $\subseteq$ in . Rather than find $a_1$ and $a_2$ explicitly, we make use of random matrices.
We may write $$y=c_01+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(c^{(1)}_a\tilde T_a(x_1)+c^{(2)}_a\tilde T_a(x_2))+\sum_{x\in S}d_x\tilde U^x,$$ | $ x\ge0 $ and $ p(x)\le0 $, then $ x\le r_2$. Taking $ w = r_2 $, we conclude that $ \mu(V)\le w$, and we have the rule . It is comfortable to see that $ w$ is a continuous function of $ m_1 $, $ m_2 $ and $ \delta$.
\[lem: stepII\ ] lease $ speed of light < d$ be real numbers. For matrix $ a_1 $ and $ a_2 $, regard the maps $ { { \mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\mathbb{C}\langle x_1,x_2\rangle\to\mathbb{C}$. Then we suffer $ $ \label{eq: kers }
\bigcap_{\substack {
N\in{\mathbb{N}}\\
a_1,a_2\in \mathbb{M}_N(\mathbb{C})_{sa } \\
c1\le a_i\le d1,\,(i=1,2) } }
\ker({{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2 })
= \mathcal{I}.$$
The inclusion $ \supseteq$ in follows from the tracing property.
Let $ vitamin c < u < v < d$ and make the choice of polynomials $ \tilde T_i$ and $ \tilde U_i$ described in Corollary \[cor: MS\ ]. let $ \Xi$ and $ \mathcal{J}$ be as in Lemm \[lem: Ponto\ ], for each $ y\in\mathcal{J}\backslash\{0\}$, we will find matrices $ a_1 $ and $ a_2 $ such that $ $ \label{eq: Tr0 }
{ { \mathrm{Tr}}}({{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}(y))\ne0.$$ By and of Lemma \[lem: Ponto\ ], this will suffice to show $ \subseteq$ in . quite than find $ a_1 $ and $ a_2 $ explicitly, we make use of random matrices.
We may publish $ $ y = c_01+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(c^{(1)}_a\tilde T_a(x_1)+c^{(2)}_a\tilde T_a(x_2))+\sum_{x\in S}d_x\tilde U^x,$$ | $x\gf0$ and $p(x)\le0$, then $x\le r_2$. Taying $w=r_2$, we conclude thet $\mu(V)\ls w$, and de have the formula . It is eady to stv that $w$ is a continuuus functpon of $m_1$, $n_2$ anv $\delta$.
\[lem:stepII\] Let $c<d$ nz ream numyecs. For matrices $a_1$ and $a_2$, cmnsider the ma[s ${{\mcthrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\mathbb{C}\langle x_1,v_2\rangle\yo\lathbb{C}$. Then wg havt $$\lwbel{sq:kers}
\bigcap_{\substack{
N\in{\mathbb{N}}\\
a_1,a_2\in \mathbb{K}_N(\mathbb{C})_{sa} \\
c1\ke a_i\le d1,\,(i=1,2)}}
\ker({{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mwthrl{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2})
=\mathcal{I}.$$
The ijclusion $\sukaetqw$ in follows from the urcce properti.
Let $c<u<v<d$ and make the choice of polyuomials $\tilee T_i$ dnd $\tilde U_m$ descgibed in Corollary \[cor:KS\]. Lettong $\Xi$ and $\matmcal{J}$ be as in Lemm \[lem:Ponto\], fmr each $y\in\mathcal{T}\backslasv\{0\}$, ce will find matrices $a_1$ and $d_2$ suwh tfqt $$\uabtl{ea:Td0}
{{\mathrl{Tr}}}({{\jathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}(g))\ne0.$$ By and if Lemma \[lem:Ponto\], thos qill suffice fo shor $\fubseteq$ in . Rather than find $a_1$ and $a_2$ exklicifly, we make use of randim matrices.
We may wrije $$y=c_01+\sum_{n=1}^\igfty(c^{(1)}_a\tilde T_a(x_1)+c^{(2)}_a\tilde T_a(x_2))+\sum_{x\in S}d_x\tilde U^x,$$ | $x\ge0$ and $p(x)\le0$, then $x\le r_2$. Taking conclude $\mu(V)\le w$, we have the to that $w$ is continuous function of $m_2$ and $\delta$. \[lem:stepII\] Let $c<d$ real numbers. For matrices $a_1$ and $a_2$, consider the maps ${{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\mathbb{C}\langle x_1,x_2\rangle\to\mathbb{C}$. Then have $$\label{eq:kers} \bigcap_{\substack{ N\in{\mathbb{N}}\\ a_1,a_2\in \mathbb{M}_N(\mathbb{C})_{sa} \\ c1\le a_i\le d1,\,(i=1,2)}} \ker({{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}) =\mathcal{I}.$$ The $\supseteq$ follows the property. Let $c<u<v<d$ and make the choice of polynomials $\tilde T_i$ and $\tilde U_i$ described in \[cor:MS\]. Letting $\Xi$ and $\mathcal{J}$ be as in \[lem:Ponto\], for each $y\in\mathcal{J}\backslash\{0\}$, will find matrices $a_1$ and such $$\label{eq:Tr0} {{\mathrm{Tr}}}({{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}(y))\ne0.$$ and Lemma this will suffice show $\subseteq$ in . Rather than find $a_1$ and $a_2$ explicitly, we make use of random matrices. may write T_a(x_2))+\sum_{x\in S}d_x\tilde | $x\ge0$ and $p(x)\le0$, then $x\le r_2$. Taking $w=R_2$, we concludE that $\Mu(V)\Le w$, AnD we hAve tHe formula . It is eASy to See that $w$ is a continuous fUnctiOn OF $m_1$, $m_2$ aND $\dElta$.
\[lEm:stepIi\] leT $C<D$ be ReAl NumBeRS. FOr matRicEs $a_1$ and $a_2$, Consider thE maPs ${{\Mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\MAtHrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\matHbb{c}\langle x_1,x_2\ranGle\To\mathBb{c}$. ThEN we haVe $$\lAbel{eQ:kers}
\bIGcap_{\suBstack{
N\in{\MaTHbb{N}}\\
a_1,a_2\IN \mathbb{m}_n(\MaThbb{c})_{sa} \\
c1\le a_i\le d1,\,(i=1,2)}}
\ker({{\maTHrM{tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{A_1,a_2})
=\mathCaL{i}.$$
THE IncLusIon $\supseteQ$ iN follOWs from tHE tRACE prOPerty.
Let $c<u<v<d$ aNd make the chOIce Of polyNoMiaLS $\tilde t_i$ and $\TiLDe U_I$ described iN CorOllary \[cor:mS\]. LettINg $\Xi$ and $\MAthcal{J}$ Be as in lemM \[leM:PonTO\], fOr EacH $y\IN\maTHcAl{J}\BAckSlash\{0\}$, we wIlL fInd maTricES $A_1$ ANd $a_2$ sUch That $$\Label{Eq:Tr0}
{{\mathrm{Tr}}}({{\mAthRm{ev}}}_{A_1,A_2}(y))\nE0.$$ By anD of LeMma \[lEm:ponto\], This wiLl sufFiCe to show $\subseteQ$ in . RAther than FinD $a_1$ And $A_2$ eXplicITly, we mAke Use Of randoM matricES.
We MaY WRItE $$y=c_01+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(c^{(1)}_a\tildE T_A(X_1)+C^{(2)}_a\Tilde T_a(x_2))+\Sum_{x\in s}D_x\TiLDe U^x,$$ | $x\ge0$ and $p(x)\le0$, t hen $x\ler_2$. Ta kin g$w=r _2$, we conclude t h at $ \mu(V)\le w$, and we h ave t he form u la . It is eas y t o see t ha t $ w$ is a co nti nuous f unction of $m _1 $, $m_2$ and $\ delta$.
\ [le m:stepII\] L et$c<d$be re a l num ber s. Fo r matr i ces $a _1$ and $ a_ 2 $, con s ider th e ma ps $ {{\mathrm{Tr}}}\, \ ci r c\,{{\mathrm{e v}}}_{ a_ 1 ,a _ 2 }:\ mat hbb{C}\lan gl e x_1 , x_2\ran g le \ t o \ma t hbb{C}$. Then we have $$ \ lab el{eq: ke rs} \bigca p_{\s ub s tac k{
N\in{\ma thbb {N}}\\
a_ 1,a_2\ i n \math b b{M}_N( \mathb b{C })_ {sa} \\
c 1\l ea _i\ l ed1, \ ,(i =1,2)}}\k er ({{\m athr m { T r }}}\ ,\c irc\ ,{{\m athrm{ev}}}_{ a_1 ,a_2 } )
= \math cal{I }.$$
The i nclusi on $\ su pseteq$ in fol lows from the tr ac e p ro perty .
Let$c< u<v <d$ and make t h e c ho i c e o f polynomials $\ti ld e T_ i$ and $ \tilde U_ i$ describe dinCoro l l ary \ [cor : MS \]. Lett ing $\ X i$ a nd $\ma th cal{J} $beasin Le m m \[ lem:Po nto\], f or ea c h $y\in\mathca l {J}\backslash \ {0 \ } $, we w ill find matri ces$ a_1$ and $a _2$ suchthat$$ \ la b el{eq:Tr0}
{{\mathr m{ Tr}}}( {{\ma thrm{ev}}}_{a _1,a_2}(y) ) \ n e0.$$ By an d o f Lemma \[lem: Ponto \], this w i ll suffi ce to show $\ subseteq$ i n . Rath ertha n f ind $ a_ 1$ and $a_2$e x plic it ly, wemak e use o f r and ommat ri ces.
Wemay writ e$$ y= c_ 01+ \sum_ { n=1}^\in ft y(c ^{ (1) }_a\t i lde T_ a(x_1 )+c^ {( 2) } _a\ tilde T _ a( x _ 2))+ \s um _{x\ inS} d_x\t ilde U^x ,$$ | $x\ge0$_and $p(x)\le0$,_then $x\le r_2$. Taking_$w=r_2$, we_conclude_that $\mu(V)\le_w$,_and we have_the formula . It_is easy to see_that $w$ is_a_continuous function of $m_1$, $m_2$ and $\delta$.
\[lem:stepII\] Let $c<d$ be real numbers. For matrices_$a_1$_and $a_2$,_consider_the_maps ${{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}:\mathbb{C}\langle x_1,x_2\rangle\to\mathbb{C}$. Then we_have $$\label{eq:kers}
\bigcap_{\substack{
N\in{\mathbb{N}}\\
a_1,a_2\in \mathbb{M}_N(\mathbb{C})_{sa} \\
c1\le a_i\le_d1,\,(i=1,2)}}
\ker({{\mathrm{Tr}}}\,\circ\,{{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2})
=\mathcal{I}.$$
The inclusion_$\supseteq$ in follows from the trace property.
Let $c<u<v<d$_and_make the choice_of polynomials $\tilde T_i$ and $\tilde U_i$ described in_Corollary \[cor:MS\]. Letting $\Xi$ and $\mathcal{J}$ be_as in Lemm \[lem:Ponto\],_for_each_$y\in\mathcal{J}\backslash\{0\}$, we will find_matrices $a_1$ and $a_2$ such that_$$\label{eq:Tr0}
{{\mathrm{Tr}}}({{\mathrm{ev}}}_{a_1,a_2}(y))\ne0.$$ By and of Lemma \[lem:Ponto\], this_will suffice to show $\subseteq$ in . Rather_than find $a_1$ and $a_2$ explicitly,_we make use of random_matrices.
We may_write $$y=c_01+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(c^{(1)}_a\tilde T_a(x_1)+c^{(2)}_a\tilde T_a(x_2))+\sum_{x\in S}d_x\tilde_U^x,$$ |
band. The peak of the X-ray emission is coincident with the position of the cD galaxy. Although the Chandra detector does not cover the entire cluster X-ray extension, a connection between the mini-halo and the X-ray emission is evident, which is better investigated in the next section.
Comparison between mini-halos and the X-ray emitting gas
========================================================
By superimposing the radio and X-ray data presented in previous sections, we emphasized the similarity between the radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the large angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to perform a quantitative comparison between the radio and X-ray brightness. Here we compare the Chandra count rate image in the $0.5-4$ keV band, with the VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation.
We first constructed a square grid covering a region containing both the radio mini-halo and the X-ray emission from which we excluded areas containing discrete radio sources. The grid cells size was chosen to be as large as the radio beam ($\simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical analysis, all the discrete sources were excluded by masking them out. All pixels lying in blanked areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistics. A scatter plot of the radio versus X-ray brightness comparisons is presented in top panel of Fig. 7. Each point represents the mean brightness in each cell of the grid, while the error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error. The close similarity between radio and X-ray structures in Ophiuchus is demonstrated by the correlation between these two parameters. We fitted the data with a power law relation of the type: $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then present the same correlation this time obtained by azimuthally averaging the radio and the X-ray emission in annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data are fitted by a power law relation of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation indicates that the radial decline in the non-thermal radio component is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray component, as can be seen in the bottom | band. The peak of the X - ray discharge is coincident with the placement of the cD galaxy. Although the Chandra detector does not cover the entire bunch X - ray extension, a association between the mini - halo and the ten - ray emission is discernible, which is better investigated in the adjacent incision.
Comparison between mini - halos and the X - ray emitting gasoline
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
By superimposing the radio and X - re data presented in previous section, we emphasized the similarity between the radio mini - halo emission and the cluster X - ray morphology of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the large angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to perform a quantitative comparison between the radio and X - ray brightness. Here we compare the Chandra count rate image in the $ 0.5 - 4 $ keV band, with the VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation.
We first construct a square grid cover a area control both the radio mini - halo and the X - ray emission from which we excluded area containing discrete radio sources. The grid cells size was choose to be as large as the radio beam ($ \simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical psychoanalysis, all the discrete sources were bar by dissemble them out. All pixels lying in blanked areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistic. A scatter plot of the radio versus adam - ray brightness comparison is presented in top panel of Fig. 7. Each detail represents the average brightness in each cellular telephone of the grid, while the error stripe indicate the corresponding statistical erroneousness. The close similarity between radio receiver and X - ray structures in Ophiuchus is prove by the correlation between these two parameters. We fitted the data with a power jurisprudence relation of the type: $ I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then show the same correlation this time obtained by azimuthally averaging the radio and the adam - ray emission in annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data are suit by a exponent jurisprudence relation of the type $ I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation bespeak that the radial decline in the non - thermal radio component is slenderly steeper than that of the thermal ten - ray component, as can be seen in the buttocks | bajd. The peak of the X-ray tmission is coincneent wmth the positiov of the cD galaxy. Although vhe Xhandea detector does not cuver the vntire clystec X-ray extension, a connegcion gctweeu vhe mini-halo anc the X-ray emission is eeiaeut, which is better investigated in tre next sfction.
Comparisjn bttwqen jpnl-halos and the X-ray emitting gas
========================================================
Gy supegimposing the radoo and X-ray data presented in orevious sections, ae emphasizgs trw similarity between the radio minj-halo emission and the cluster B-ray korphologigs ov A2029, A1835, and Opiiuchuf. Because of the larce angukar extension pf Mphuuchus, it is possible to perform a quanjitative cmm'arison between the rqduo ang X-rdy bfughgneas. Hsre we cojpare the Dhandra coubt rate image in tht $0.5-4$ hvF band, with fhe VLW wadio image, corrected for the primary btam aftenuation.
We first consrructed a square grid covering a region containing both the radio mini-halo and dhe X-cah enifruoj from which we excluded areas containing dissdeue gadio sources. The grid cells slzr was chosen tu be as lzrge as the radio heam ($\siieq$ 90$''$). Un the stwtisyical analysis, all the disceete sources qere excluded by mcsking them uut. Sll poxels lying in blanked creas kr close to the edgea of the chips wefe slvo excluded from the statiftics. A srattex plot ow thg radio versus X-rwy brlchtness comparisond is kresended in top panel of Fig. 7. Each point represents the mean bsigvtness iu each cell of the drid, while the error yars ivdicate thv correspmnding statystical error. Jhe close simmlarity bqtwewn rqdio ana X-ray structurrs in Ophpuehus is dwmonstrated by the cotrslation between thtsw two parametets. De sintev the gata with a [owef lxe relxtion of thc thpe: $O_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We theh present the same cjrrelatiin this eime obtained by azimuthally avtraginj the cadio snd the X-ray emission in annuli (sse middle pakel of Fig.7). Thq daba ate fitted bv a power law relation of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\'ropto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is cinsistent within thg evrors with tie scaeter plot analysis. The correlqtion indicates tmat the radial decline in tha non-hhermal radio component is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray compoiegt, as can bs sern in tke yottom | band. The peak of the X-ray emission with position of cD galaxy. Although cover entire cluster X-ray a connection between mini-halo and the X-ray emission is which is better investigated in the next section. Comparison between mini-halos and the emitting gas ======================================================== By superimposing the radio and X-ray data presented in previous we the between radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to a quantitative comparison between radio and X-ray brightness. Here compare Chandra count image the keV band, with VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation. We first constructed a square grid covering a containing both mini-halo and X-ray from we excluded areas radio sources. The grid cells size be as large as the radio beam ($\simeq$ In the analysis, all the discrete sources were by masking them out. All pixels lying in areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistics. plot of the radio X-ray brightness comparisons presented top of 7. Each represents the mean brightness in each cell of the grid, while error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error. The close similarity and structures in Ophiuchus demonstrated by the correlation these parameters. We fitted the a law type: GHz}\propto 0.04}$. We then present same correlation this time obtained azimuthally averaging the radio annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data fitted by a power law relation of type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with scatter plot correlation indicates that the radial decline in the radio component is slightly than that of the thermal X-ray component, as can seen the bottom | band. The peak of the X-ray emissIon is coincIdent WitH thE pOsitIon oF the cD galaxy. AlTHougH the Chandra detector doeS not cOvER the ENtIre clUster X-rAY eXTEnsIoN, a ConNeCTiOn betWeeN the minI-halo and thE X-rAy Emission is evIDeNt, which is bEttEr investigatEd iN the neXt SecTIon.
CoMpaRison BetweeN Mini-haLos and the x-rAY emittINg gas
========================================================
By SUPeRimpOsing the radio and X-RAy DAta presented in PrevioUs SEcTIOns, We eMphasized tHe SimilARity betWEeN THE raDIo mini-halo emiSsion and the CLusTer X-raY mOrpHOlogieS of A2029, A1835, AnD ophIuchus. BecauSe of The large aNgular EXtensioN Of OphiuChus, it Is pOssIble TO pErForM a QUanTItAtiVE coMparison BeTwEen thE radIO AND X-raY brIghtNess. HEre we compare tHe CHandRA coUnt raTe imaGe in ThE $0.5-4$ keV bAnd, witH the VlA Radio image, correCted For the priMarY bEam AtTenuaTIon.
We fIrsT coNstructEd a squaRE grId COVErIng a region containiNg BOTh The radio Mini-haLO aNd THe X-ray emIsSioN froM WHich wE excLUdEd areas cOntainINg DiScrete rAdIo sourCeS. ThE grId celLS sizE was chOsen to be As larGE as the radio beaM ($\Simeq$ 90$''$). In the staTIsTICaL AnalYsiS, all the discRete SOurcEs weRE eXclUDed by MaskiNg THeM Out. All pixels lying in BlAnked aReas oR close to the edGes of the chIPS Were also ExclUDeD From the statistIcs. A sCatter plot OF the radiO versUs X-ray brIghtness cOMParisons Is pResEntEd iN TOp Panel of Fig. 7. EacH POint RePresentS thE mean brIghTneSs iN eaCh Cell of the Grid, whilE tHe ErRoR baRs indICate the cOrResPoNdiNg staTIsticaL erroR. The ClOsE SimIlarity BEtWEEn raDiO aNd X-rAy sTrUcturEs in oPhiUchus is DemonstraTed BY the CoRrElation Between these tWo Parameters. we FitTed the DATa with a pOwer law relation of the typE: $i_{1.4 GHz}\proPto i_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. WE theN present tHe sAme corRelATion thIs time ObtaiNeD by AZImuthALLy AveRaGing the radIO And The X-rAy EmisSion in aNnuli (see middle paneL Of FIg.7). The data are fIttEd by A POwEr lAW rELatIoN Of tHE Type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_x^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is CoNSiStent withiN The ErRors witH the scaTter pLOt analySis. The corRelation iNdIcatES ThaT the radial Decline iN the non-thERmal rADiO compOneNt is slIgHtlY steePer thaN ThaT of thE thermAl x-ray coMponeNt, As can be sEen in the bottom | band. The peak of the X-r ay emissio n iscoi nci de nt w iththe position o f the cD galaxy. Although t he Ch an d ra d e te ctordoes no t c o v erth eent ir e c luste r X -ray ex tension, a co nn ection betwe e nthe mini-h alo and the X-r ayemissi on is evide nt, whic h is b e tter i nvestigat ed in the next se c t io n.
Comparison betwee n m i ni-halos and t he X-r ay em i t tin g g as
======= == ===== = ======= = == = = = === = ============= ===========
By super im pos i ng the radi oa ndX-ray datapres ented inprevio u s secti o ns, weemphas ize d t he s i mi la rit yb etw e en th e ra dio mini -h al o emi ssio n a n d th e c lust er X- ray morpholog ies ofA 202 9, A1 835,andOp hiuch us. Be cause o f the large ang ular extensio n o fOph iu chus, it ispos sib le to p erforma qu an t i t at ive comparison bet we e n t he radio and X - ra yb rightnes s. He re w e compa re t h eChandracountr at eimage i nthe $0 .5 -4$ ke V ban d , wi th the VLA rad io im a ge, correctedf or the primar y b e a ma tten uat ion.
We fi rstc onst ruct e da s q uaregridco v er i ng a region contain in g both theradio mini-ha lo and the X - ray emis sion fr o m which we exc luded areas con t aining d iscre te radio sources. T he gridcel lssiz e w a s c hosen to be a s larg eas therad io beam ($ \si meq $ 9 0$ ''$). Inthe stat is ti ca lana lysis , all the d isc re tesourc e s were excl uded b ym ask ing the m o u t . Al lpi xels ly in g inblan k edareas o r close t o t h e ed ge sof thechips were al so excludedfr omthe st a t istics.A scatter plot of the r a dio ver sus X-ra y br ightnesscom pariso nsi s pres entedin to ppan e l of F i g .7.Ea ch point r e p res entsth e me an brig htness in each cel l of the grid, wh ile the e rr orb ar s in di c ate t he correspondin g statisti ca l e rror. Thec los esimilar ity bet weenr adio an d X-ray s tructures i n Op h i uch us is demo nstrated by the c o rrela t io n bet wee n thes etwo para meters . We fitt ed the d ata wi th apo wer lawrelation of the type: $ I_{1.4 GHz} \pr opto I_X^ {1. 5 1\p m 0.04}$. Wethen prese ntthe same co r relat iont hi s t i me ob tain e d by azim u th all y av eraging the r a dio andthe X-rayemis sion in annuli (s e e middle panel ofF i g.7 ).T he d at a are fitted b y a p o w er law r el ation of th e type $ I_ { 1.4 G Hz}\pr opto I _X^{1.6 \ p m0 .1}$,whic h i s consist ent w i thin th eer r ors wi th t he scatt er plo t ana l y sis. The correla tioni n dicat e s t hat t he radial decl ine in the non-therma l radi o co mpone nt is s li ghtlyste ep er than th a t of thetherm al X-ra ycomp one nt, as can b e see n in t hebottom | band._The peak_of the X-ray emission_is coincident_with_the position_of_the cD galaxy._Although the Chandra_detector does not cover_the entire cluster_X-ray_extension, a connection between the mini-halo and the X-ray emission is evident, which is_better_investigated in_the_next_section.
Comparison between mini-halos and the_X-ray emitting gas
========================================================
By superimposing the_radio and_X-ray data presented in previous sections, we emphasized_the_similarity between the_radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of_A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of_the large angular_extension_of_Ophiuchus, it is possible_to perform a quantitative comparison between_the radio and X-ray brightness. Here_we compare the Chandra count rate image_in the $0.5-4$ keV band, with_the VLA radio image, corrected_for the_primary beam attenuation.
We first constructed_a square grid_covering a_region containing both_the radio mini-halo and the X-ray_emission from which_we excluded areas containing discrete radio_sources._The grid cells_size_was_chosen to_be as large_as_the radio_beam_($\simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical analysis,_all_the discrete sources were excluded by masking_them out. All pixels_lying_in blanked areas or_close to the edges of_the chips were also excluded from_the statistics._A scatter_plot of the radio versus X-ray brightness comparisons is presented in_top panel of Fig. 7. Each_point represents the mean_brightness in_each_cell of the_grid,_while the_error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error._The close_similarity between radio and X-ray structures_in Ophiuchus is demonstrated_by_the correlation between these two parameters._We fitted the data with a_power law relation of the_type:_$I_{1.4_GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then_present the same correlation this time_obtained by azimuthally_averaging the radio and the X-ray emission_in_annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7)._The_data are fitted by a power_law_relation_of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto_I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within_the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation_indicates that the_radial decline in the non-thermal_radio_component_is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray component,_as can_be seen in_the bottom |
Subsets and Splits