://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+5X+Teardown/51318#s112148)

[3]
[https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s10...](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s100455)

[4] [http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces-
mumimo...](http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces-
mumimo-80211ac-family-increasing-the-efficiency-of-80211ac-networks)

[5] [https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel-
gen/...](https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel-
gen/blob/master/src/device_id.h)

------
resoluteteeth
Is this an actual plan of Google as a company, or is this some sort of
Microsoft-style war between divisions where the Chrome team has just decided
on its own that the future is based on Chrome and Dart?

Also, considering the way that the ARC runtime for Chromebooks was a failure
and had to be replaced by a system that apparently essentially runs Android in
a container, will it really be possible for a completely different OS to
provide reasonable backward compatibility?

~~~
throwawaydbfif
I would say that Google is trying to replace JavaScript with dart in any way
they possibly can. The reason is simple, JavaScript is an open standard, dart
is owned by google.

Their reasons that "dart is better" is the typical google koolaid before they
attempt a market takeover. As we've seen over and over with Android, chrome,
and AMP especially. Google loves to make glass house open source projects you
can't touch. You're free to look at how great it is, feel it's well refined
curves and admire the finish, but God help you if you don't like how the
project is going and want to fork it for yourself.

Don't
: //www.ifixit.com / Teardown / Nexus+5X+Teardown/51318#s112148) 

 [ 3 ] 
 [ https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s10...](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s100455) 

 [ 4 ] [ http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces- 
 mumimo... ](http://www.anandtech.com / show/7921 / qualcomm - announces- 
 mumimo-80211ac - family - increasing - the - efficiency - of-80211ac - networks) 

 [ 5 ] [ https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel- 
 gen/... ](https://github.com / fuchsia - mirror / drivers - gpu - msd - intel- 
 gen / blob / victor / src / device_id.h) 

 ------ 
 resoluteteeth 
 Is this an actual design of Google as a company, or is this some sort of 
 Microsoft - vogue war between part where the Chrome team has just decided 
 on its own that the future is establish on Chrome and Dart? 

 Also, considering the manner that the ARC runtime for Chromebooks was a failure 
 and had to be substitute by a system that apparently basically runs Android in 
 a container, will it really be possible for a completely different OS to 
 provide fair backward compatibility? 

 ~~~ 
 throwawaydbfif 
 I would say that Google is trying to replace JavaScript with flit in any way 
 they possibly can. The reason is simple, JavaScript is an open standard, dart 
 is own by google. 

 Their reasons that " flit is better " is the typical google koolaid before they 
 attempt a market coup d'etat. As we've seen over and over with Android, chrome, 
 and AMP especially. Google loves to make glass house open source projects you 
 can't touch. You're free to look at how great it is, feel it's well refined 
 curves and admire the coating, but God help you if you don't like how the 
 undertaking is sound and desire to fork it for yourself. 

 Don't
://www.lfixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+5X+Ttardown/51318#s112148)

[3]
[https://www.iyuxit.cok/Teardkwn/OnePljs+2+Teardown/45352#s10...](https://www.ifixit.com/Veareown/ObePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s100455)

[4] [http://wwd.anandtecj.com/show/7921/wualromm-announces-
mummjo...](http://www.anansbech.cmn/show/7921/qualcomm-aknounces-
mumhmo-80211ac-family-incsexsnng-the-efficiency-of-80211ac-networks)

[5] [https://giehub.com/gufhsia-mirror/driders-b[u-mss-pnuel-
gen/...](https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/srivers-jpu-msd-intel-
gen/bkob/master/src/device_id.h)

------
resolktetfeth
Is this an actkal plan of Goodoe as a compxny, or is uhns some sorj of
Microsoft-style war between dkvisipns where jkw Cjtome team haw jusn decided
on ibx own dhat thr future is baxed on Chrome and Dart?

Also, ronsidering the way jhat the ASC runtime for Chronevooks was a fxulufe
ahd hzd to he ceplaced by a system tyat apparently essemtyqlly runs Anddoid ig
a container, will it really be possible fmr z completely different IS to
provide reasonabpe backwawd compatibility?

~~~
throwawaydbfif
I would say that Gomgle ms trvlkg tu rfplace JavaScript with dart in any way
they pofainlj can. The reason ls simple, JavaScrilt ix an open stanaard, dcdt
js owned by google.

Hheir rgasons that "daru is netter" is the typical googlw koolaid beyorw they
attempt a maxket takeovex. As wg've sern over and over with Audroid, chrome,
and WMP especjxlly. Google lover tp kake glass house open sourse projecvs yob
can't tojch. Iou're fwee to loon at mmw great it is, feep it's wall refinef
curves and admire the finish, bnv God help yoo ix ymu don't jike mow the
project ys going and wcnt to fjrk ig for youraelf.

Don'v
://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+5X+Teardown/51318#s112148) [3] [https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s10...](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s100455) [4] [http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces- mumimo...](http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces- mumimo-80211ac-family-increasing-the-efficiency-of-80211ac-networks) gen/...](https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel- ------ resoluteteeth this an actual company, is this some of Microsoft-style war divisions where the Chrome team has decided on its own that the future is based on Chrome and Dart? considering the way that the ARC runtime for Chromebooks was a failure and to replaced a that apparently essentially runs Android in a container, will it really be possible for a completely OS to provide reasonable backward compatibility? ~~~ throwawaydbfif would say that Google trying to replace JavaScript with in way they can. reason simple, JavaScript is open standard, dart is owned by google. Their reasons that "dart is better" is the typical google before they market takeover. we've over over with Android, AMP especially. Google loves to make source projects you can't touch. You're free to at how it is, feel it's well refined and admire the finish, but God help you you don't like how the project is going and want to fork it for yourself.
://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+5x+Teardown/51318#s112148)

[3]
[Https://Www.IfiXiT.com/tearDown/OnePlus+2+TeaRDown/45352#S10...](https://www.ifixit.com/TearDown/ONepLus+2+TEArDown/45352#s100455)

[4] [Http://www.ANaNDTecH.cOm/ShoW/7921/qUAlComm-aNnoUnces-
muMimo...](http://wwW.anAnDtech.com/show/7921/QUaLcomm-annouNceS-
mumimo-80211ac-famIly-IncreaSiNg-tHE-effiCieNcy-of-80211Ac-netwORks)

[5] [httPs://github.cOm/FUchsia-MIrror/drIVErS-gpu-Msd-intel-
gen/...](https://gIThUB.com/fuchsia-mirRor/driVeRS-gPU-Msd-IntEl-
gen/blob/mAsTer/srC/Device_iD.H)

------
rESOLutETeeth
Is this an Actual plan oF gooGle as a CoMpaNY, or is tHis soMe SOrt Of
Microsoft-StylE war betweEn diviSIons wheRE the ChrOme teaM haS juSt deCIdEd
On iTs OWn tHAt The FUtuRe is baseD oN CHrome And DART?

aLso, cOnsIderIng thE way that the ARc ruNtimE For chromEbookS was A fAilurE
and haD to be RePlaced by a system That ApparentlY esSeNtiAlLy runS androiD in
A coNtainer, Will it rEAllY bE POSsIble for a completely DiFFErEnt OS to
pRovide REaSoNAble backWaRd cOmpaTIBilitY?

~~~
thrOWaWaydbfif
i would SAy ThAt GooglE iS tryinG tO rePlaCe JavAscriPt with Dart in anY way
tHEy possibly can. THE reason is simpLE, JAVASCRipt Is aN open standaRd, daRT
is oWned BY gOogLE.

TheiR reasOnS ThAT "dart is better" is the tYpIcal goOgle kOolaid before tHey
attempt A MARket takeOver. aS wE'Ve seen over and oVer wiTh Android, cHRome,
and AmP espEcially. GOogle loveS TO make glaSs hOusE opEn sOURcE projects you
cAN'T touCh. you're frEe tO look at How GreAt iT is, FeEl it's well Refined
cUrVeS aNd AdmIre thE Finish, buT GOd hElP yoU if yoU Don't liKe how The
pRoJeCT is Going anD WaNT To foRk It For yOurSeLf.

Don'T
://www.ifixit.com/Teardown /Nexus+5X+ Teard own /51 31 8#s1 1214 8)

[3]
[https : //ww w.ifixit.com/Teardown/ OnePl us + 2+Te a rd own/4 5352#s1 0 .. . ] (ht tp s: //w ww . if ixit. com /Teardo wn/OnePlus +2+ Te ardown/45352 # s1 00455)

[4 ] [ http://www.a nan dtech. co m/s h ow/79 21/ qualc omm-an n ounces -
mumimo. .. ] (http: / /www.an a n dt ech. com/show/7921/qua l co m m-announces-
m umimo- 80 2 11 a c -fa mil y-increasi ng -the- e fficien c y- o f - 802 1 1ac-networks) 

[5] [http s :// github .c om/ f uchsia -mirr or / dri vers-gpu-ms d-in tel-
gen/ ...](h t tps://g i thub.co m/fuch sia -mi rror / dr iv ers -g p u-m s d- int e l-gen/blob /m as ter/s rc/d e v i c e_id .h) 

-- ----resoluteteeth 
Is  thi s  an  actu al pl an o fGoogl e as a  comp an y, or is this s omesort of
M icr os oft -s tylew ar bet wee n d ivision s where the  C h r o me  team has just dec id e d 
o n its ow n that th ef uture is  b ase d on C hrome  and Da rt?

Als o, con s id er ing the  w ay tha tthe  AR C run t imefor Ch romebook s was a failure
andh ad to be repl a ce d by a sy ste m that appa rent l y es sent i al lyr uns A ndroi di na  container, will it  r eallybe po ssible for acompletely d i fferentOS t o 
p r ovide reasonab le ba ckward com p atibilit y?

~ ~~
throw awaydbfif I  would s aytha t G oog l e  i s trying to r e p lace  J avaScri ptwith da rtinany  wa ythey poss ibly can .Th ere aso n iss imple, J av aSc ri ptis an open s tanda rd,da rt isowned b y  g o o gle. 
Th eirrea so ns th at " d art  is bet ter" is t het ypic al  g oogle k oolaid before  t hey
attemp ta m arkett a keover.As we've seen over ando ver wit h A ndroi d, c hrome,
an d A MP esp eci a lly. G oogleloves  t o m a k e gla s s  h ous eopen sourc e pro jects  y ou
c an't to uch. You're free t o  lo ok at how gre atit i s ,  f eel it ' s w el l  re f i ned
curves andadmire the  f i ni sh, but Go d  he lp  you if  you do n't l i ke howthe
proje ct is goi ng  and w ant  to fork i t for yo urself.
D on't
://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+5X+Teardown/51318#s112148)

[3]
[https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s10...](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/OnePlus+2+Teardown/45352#s100455)

[4] [http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces-
mumimo...](http://www.anandtech.com/show/7921/qualcomm-announces-
mumimo-80211ac-family-increasing-the-efficiency-of-80211ac-networks)

[5]_[https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel-
gen/...](https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/drivers-gpu-msd-intel-
gen/blob/master/src/device_id.h)

------
resoluteteeth
Is this_an actual plan of_Google as_a_company, or_is_this some sort_of
Microsoft-style war between_divisions where the Chrome_team has just_decided
on_its own that the future is based on Chrome and Dart?

Also, considering the way_that_the ARC_runtime_for_Chromebooks was a failure
and had_to be replaced by a_system that_apparently essentially runs Android in
a container, will it_really_be possible for_a completely different OS to
provide reasonable backward compatibility?

~~~
throwawaydbfif
I would_say that Google is trying to_replace JavaScript with_dart_in_any way
they possibly can._The reason is simple, JavaScript is_an open standard, dart
is owned by_google.

Their reasons that "dart is better" is_the typical google koolaid before they
attempt_a market takeover. As we've_seen over_and over with Android, chrome,
and_AMP especially. Google_loves to_make glass house_open source projects you
can't touch. You're_free to look_at how great it is, feel_it's_well refined
curves and_admire_the_finish, but_God help you_if_you don't_like_how the
project is going and want_to_fork it for yourself.

Don't