o
"Browsers are often horrible at resizing files; it would not look good at
all."

What's with the weasel words? You can name names if you want. Which browsers?
what do they do that makes them look horrible? The only browsers left I know
of that use nearest neighbour resampling are ie7 and ie8.

"If you want to mess with speed, save it."

You're joking, right?

"If you want a way to trigger replay in your browser, file a bug report."

you definitely are joking. You think I'm the first person to ever want that?

~~~
Dylan16807
I'm not joking when I say right click should have a repeat option. Why does a
suggestion to file a bug report sound dismissive to you? It's not like I told
you to code it yourself.

I'm not joking about changing speed; how often do you want to play a video in
slow motion? It's not really the browser's job to do that.

I used weasel words because I didn't want to go testing. In addition to me
remembering additional issues on my phone, Opera and IE10 do bad resampling,
and chrome does a weird thing where it shows bad resampling for a couple
seconds before replacing it with good resampling. Specifically, when I say
'bad' here, it's not nearest neighbor but it's not using a proper method
either. Small details, such as lines 3-4 pixels wide, disappear entirely in
spots when I zoom out. They're using algorithms that only sample a couple of
points, which breaks down terribly on sizes like 33%.

Edit: I found a mozilla bug report claiming that high-quality resizing is
turned off if an image is on a page multiple times. Ech.

~~~
TheZenPsycho
The suggestion to file a bug report doesn't sound dismissive. It sounds naive.
It assumes that I wouldn't go to the bugzilla and just see, already there,
these:
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875)

(2010)

[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
o 
 " Browsers are often horrible at resizing file; it would not attend good at 
 all. " 

 What's with the weasel words? You can name name if you want. Which browsers? 
 what do they practice that form them look atrocious? The lone browsers leave I know 
 of that use approximate neighbour resampling are ie7 and ie8. 

 " If you desire to mess with speed, save it. " 

 You're joke, right? 

 " If you want a manner to trigger replay in your browser, file a bug reputation. " 

 you definitely are joking. You think I'm the inaugural person to ever want that? 

 ~~~ 
 Dylan16807 
 I'm not joking when I say right click should own a repeat option. Why does a 
 suggestion to file a bug reputation sound dismissive to you? It's not like I told 
 you to code it yourself. 

 I'm not joking about changing speed; how often do you want to play a video in 
 slow gesture? It's not really the browser's job to do that. 

 I use weasel discussion because I didn't want to go test. In addition to me 
 remembering additional issues on my telephone, Opera and IE10 do bad resampling, 
 and chrome does a weird thing where it shows bad resampling for a couple 
 second base before replacing it with good resampling. Specifically, when I say 
' bad' here, it's not nearest neighbor but it's not using a proper method acting 
 either. belittled details, such as lines 3 - 4 pixels wide, disappear entirely in 
 spot when I zoom out. They're using algorithms that merely sample a couple of 
 points, which breaks down terribly on sizes like 33% . 

 Edit: I found a mozilla microbe report claim that high - timbre resizing is 
 turned off if an image is on a page multiple times. Ech. 

 ~~~ 
 TheZenPsycho 
 The suggestion to charge a bug report doesn't voice dismissive. It sounds naive. 
 It assume that I wouldn't go to the bugzilla and just see, already there, 
 these: 
 [ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875) 

 (2010) 

 [ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
o
"Brlwsers are often horriblt at resizing filgs; it wonld not look goud at
all."

What's with the weasep qords? You can name names if you want. Which beowstrs?
what do they do that makes tgcm lomj horrible? The only browvers left I knmw
uf that use nearest neighbour resamplyng are if7 and ie8.

"If you wanu tj meas with speed, save it."

You're joking, dight?

"If you want a wsy to trigger replay in yokr bgowser, file a bug geport."

you dgrinyrely are jokkng. You thpuk I'm the fjrst person to ever want that?

~~~
Dyuan16807
I'm not jokint qhej I say righv clich should havc a repaat optoon. Why does a
xugjestuon to file a bug repmrt sound dismisside to you? Ic's not like I told
you ti codg it fourrwlf.

K'm hov jkking wbont changing speed; how iften do you want tp [oay a video ih
slow ioeion? It's not really the browser's job to do that.

I used weasel wordw because I didn't wanj to go tefting. In addition to me
remembering additional issges oi oy khine, Oowrw and IE10 do bad resampling,
and chrome does a wqjrc nhing where it shjws bad ressmologg for a coupue
secouss before replacing lt with good resampligg. Slecifically, when I say
'bad' hwre, it's not ueaeest neighbor but nt's not usiny a prpper kethod
either. Small detanls, sudh as lines 3-4 pixels skde, disappear engirvly hn
spots when I zoom out. Thqy're usinj algprithms thaj only fample a cluple of
points, which brewks dlwt terribly on sizes like 33%.

Edit: I found a mozilla bug repprd cnaiming chat hlgh-quality resising is
turned pff if cn imaee is on a page mnltiple timef. Ech.

~~~
TheZenPsffho
The suggevtion to filw a vug repuft doesn't sounc dismisspvt. It soundw naive.
It assumes bhat K wouldn't go to cke bugzilla and jist seq, wlceady dhere,
these:
[htdps://bjgzkkla.moxilla.org/shoc_bjg.cgo?id=617875](https://bugzilla.mozinla.odg/show_bug.cgi?id=617875)

(2010)

[httpx://bmgzilla.moeilla.org
o "Browsers are often horrible at resizing would look good all." What's with name if you want. browsers? what do do that makes them look horrible? only browsers left I know of that use nearest neighbour resampling are ie7 ie8. "If you want to mess with speed, save it." You're joking, right? you a to replay in your browser, file a bug report." you definitely are joking. You think I'm the person to ever want that? ~~~ Dylan16807 I'm joking when I say click should have a repeat Why a suggestion file bug sound dismissive to It's not like I told you to code it yourself. I'm not joking about changing speed; how do you play a in motion? not really the to do that. I used weasel didn't want to go testing. In addition to remembering additional on my phone, Opera and IE10 bad resampling, and chrome does a weird thing it shows bad resampling for a couple seconds before replacing it with good resampling. Specifically, say 'bad' here, it's nearest neighbor but not a method Small details, as lines 3-4 pixels wide, disappear entirely in spots when I out. They're using algorithms that only sample a couple of breaks terribly on sizes 33%. Edit: I found mozilla report claiming that high-quality turned if on page times. Ech. ~~~ TheZenPsycho suggestion to file a bug doesn't sound dismissive. It I wouldn't go to the bugzilla and just already there, these: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875) (2010) [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
o
"Browsers are often horrible At resizing Files; It wOulD nOt loOk goOd at
all."

What's wiTH the Weasel words? You can name nAmes iF yOU wanT. whIch brOwsers?
wHAt DO TheY dO tHat MaKEs Them lOok HorriblE? The only brOwsErS left I know
of THaT use nearesT neIghbour resamPliNg are iE7 aNd iE8.

"if you WanT to meSs with SPeed, saVe it."

You're JoKIng, rigHT?

"If you wANT a Way tO trigger replay in yOUr BRowser, file a bug Report."

YoU DeFINitEly Are joking. YOu Think i'M the firST pERSOn tO Ever want that?

~~~
DYlan16807
I'm not joKIng When I sAy RigHT click ShoulD hAVe a Repeat optioN. Why Does a
suggEstion TO file a bUG report Sound dIsmIssIve tO YoU? IT's nOt LIke i ToLd
yOU to Code it yoUrSeLf.

I'm nOt joKING AbouT chAngiNg speEd; how often do yOu wAnt tO PlaY a vidEo in
sLow mOtIon? It'S not reAlly tHe Browser's job to do That.

i used weasEl wOrDs bEcAuse I DIdn't waNt tO go Testing. in additIOn tO mE
REMeMbering additional iSsUES oN my phone, opera aND Ie10 dO Bad resamPlIng,
And cHROme doEs a wEIrD thing whEre it sHOwS bAd resamPlIng for A cOupLe
sEcondS BefoRe replAcing it wIth goOD resampling. SpeCIfically, when I SAy
'BAD' hERe, it'S noT nearest neiGhboR But iT's noT UsIng A PropeR methOd
EItHEr. Small details, such aS lInes 3-4 piXels wIde, disappear eNtirely in
sPOTS when I zoOm ouT. thEY're using algoriThms tHat only samPLe a couplE of
poInts, whicH breaks doWN Terribly On sIzeS liKe 33%.

EDIT: I Found a mozilla BUG repOrT claimiNg tHat high-QuaLitY reSizInG is
turned Off if an iMaGe Is On A paGe mulTIple timeS. ECh.

~~~
THezenpsychO
the sugGestiOn to FiLe A Bug Report dOEsN'T SounD dIsMissIve. it SoundS naiVE.
It Assumes That I woulDn't GO to tHe BuGzilla aNd just see, alreAdY there,
thesE:
[hTtpS://bugziLLA.mozilla.Org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875](https://bugZIlla.mozIllA.org/sHow_bUg.cgi?id=617875)

(2010)

[htTps://BugzilLa.mOZilla.oRg
o
"Browsers are often horr ible at re sizin g f ile s;  itwoul d not look goo d  atall."

What's with the  weas el word s ?You c an name na m e s i fyo u w an t .Which  br owsers? 
what do t hey  d o that makes th em look ho rri ble? The onl y b rowser slef t  I kn owof th at use neares t neighbo ur resamp l ing are i e7  and  ie8.

"If you wa n tt o mess with sp eed, s av e  i t . "
You 're joking ,right ? 

"If y o uw a n t a way to trigge r replay in you r brow se r,f ile abug r ep o rt. "

you defi nite ly are jo king.Y ou thin k  I'm th e firs t p ers on t o  e ve r w an t  th a t? 

~ ~ ~
D ylan1680 7I' m not  jok i n g when  Isayright  click should  ha ve a rep eat o ption . Wh ydoesa
sugg estio nto file a bug r epor t sound d ism is siv eto yo u ? It's  no t l ike I t old
you toco d e it  yourself.

I'm no tj o ki ng about  chang i ng  s p eed; how  o fte n do y ou wa nt t o  p lay a vi deo in sl ow  motion ?It's n ot  re all y the brow ser'sjob to d o tha t .

I used weas e l words becau s eI di d n'twan t to go tes ting .  Inaddi t io n t o  me
r ememb er i ng additional issues o nmy pho ne, O pera and IE10  do bad re s a m pling,
a nd c h ro m e does a weird  thin g where it shows ba d res amplingfor a cou p l e
second s b efo rerep l a ci ng it with go o d  res am pling.Spe cifical ly,  wh enI s ay 
'bad' he re, it's  n ot  n ea res t nei g hbor but  i t's  n otusing a prop er me thod 
e it h er.  Smalld et a i ls,su ch  aslin es  3-4pixe l s w ide, di sappear e nti r elyin 
s pots wh en I zoom out .They're us in g a lgorit h m s that o nly sample a couple ofp oints,whi ch br eaks  down ter rib ly onsiz e s like  33%.
Edit :I f o u nd am o zi lla  b ug reportc l aim ing t ha t hi gh-qual ity resizing is
tu r ned  off if an im age  iso n  a  pa g em ult ip l e t i m es. Ech.

~~~
T heZenPsych oT he  suggestio n  to  f ile a b ug repo rt do e sn't so und dismi ssive. It  s ound s nai ve.
It ass umes tha t I would n 't go to  thebug zillaan d j ust s ee, al r ead y the re,
th es e:
[ht tps:/ /b ugzilla. mozilla.org/show_bug.cg i?id=6 17875 ](h ttps://bu gzi l la. mozilla.o rg/s how_bug.cg i?i d=6 17875 )
( 2010) 

[h t tp s:/ / bugzi lla. m ozilla.or g 
o
"Browsers are_often horrible_at resizing files; it_would not_look_good at
all."

What's_with_the weasel words?_You can name_names if you want._Which browsers?
what do_they_do that makes them look horrible? The only browsers left I know
of that use_nearest_neighbour resampling_are_ie7_and ie8.

"If you want to_mess with speed, save it."

You're_joking, right?

"If_you want a way to trigger replay in_your_browser, file a_bug report."

you definitely are joking. You think I'm the_first person to ever want that?

~~~
Dylan16807
I'm_not joking when_I_say_right click should have_a repeat option. Why does a
suggestion_to file a bug report sound_dismissive to you? It's not like I_told
you to code it yourself.

I'm not_joking about changing speed; how_often do_you want to play a_video in
slow motion?_It's not_really the browser's_job to do that.

I used weasel_words because I_didn't want to go testing. In_addition_to me
remembering additional_issues_on_my phone,_Opera and IE10_do_bad resampling,
and_chrome_does a weird thing where it_shows_bad resampling for a couple
seconds before replacing_it with good resampling._Specifically,_when I say
'bad' here,_it's not nearest neighbor but_it's not using a proper method
either._Small details,_such as_lines 3-4 pixels wide, disappear entirely in
spots when I zoom out._They're using algorithms that only sample_a couple of
points, which_breaks down_terribly_on sizes like_33%.

Edit:_I found_a mozilla bug report claiming that high-quality_resizing is
turned_off if an image is on_a page multiple times._Ech.

~~~
TheZenPsycho
The_suggestion to file a bug report_doesn't sound dismissive. It sounds naive.
It_assumes that I wouldn't go_to_the_bugzilla and just see, already_there,
these:
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617875)

(2010)

[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org