 of the world? Yes... but
only if the rest of the world has no technology or monies of its own, and
additionally none of the 'rich' are in opposition that that single renegades
plan.

------
fithisux
Anti-aging is for future. For now

ban smokes/alcohol tax fat/sugar

for those causing accidents, make them pay the hospital bills and eliminate
unemployment. Law cannot stop injustice, which reduces quality of life, but
can make people feel that someone is by their side, which increases quality of
life.

~~~
aggie
> ban smokes/alcohol

That didn't even work with a Constitutional amendment. If culture doesn't
change, you'll have to live with it - there's no legal remedy.

> tax fat/sugar

Risky, given the track record of nutrition science, but better than outright
bans. Why don't we start by not subsidizing sugar.

 
Ask HN: What kind of scoring algorithms exist? - esflow
Hi HN, in my project I need to sort apartments and there is a lot of data about each of them. I give each parameter score, f.e. to the size of the apartment I give some certain score, to location as well, but it doesn&#x27;t really work well because I don&#x27;t understand how to give the weight to each parameter. Question: Is there some sort of guideline on scoring&#x2F;sorting things, some algorithms that might help? Or you might have some suggestions on where to look for information about such things. Thanks!
======
PaulHoule
It's tricky. Read up on Pareto Optimization.

You can't really trade off square footage vs commute length linearly because
there is no objective criterion.

What you can do is prove that Apartment A has fewer square feet than Apartment
B and a longer commute so A is dominated by B.

Out of your complete set of apartments you can that there is a small set that
dominate all the others. When you are down to that you can make your personal
choice from that set.

~~~
esflow
At this moment how I do it: The initial score is 0, based on year of
construction (newer is better ofc) I add 0-36 points,
of the world? Yes... but 
 only if the rest of the world take no engineering or monies of its own, and 
 additionally none of the' rich' are in opposition that that individual deserter 
 plan. 

 ------ 
 fithisux 
 Anti - aging is for future. For immediately 

 bachelor of arts in nursing smokes / alcohol tax adipose tissue / sugar 

 for those causing accident, make them pay the hospital bill and eliminate 
 unemployment. Law cannot stop injustice, which reduces quality of life, but 
 can lay down people feel that someone is by their english, which increases quality of 
 life. 

 ~~~ 
 aggie 
 > ban smokes / alcohol 

 That didn't even function with a Constitutional amendment. If culture doesn't 
 change, you'll have to live with it - there's no legal redress. 

 > tax fat / sugar 

 Risky, given the track record of nutrition skill, but adept than outright 
 bans. Why don't we start by not subsidizing sugar. 

 
 Ask HN: What kind of scoring algorithms exist? - esflow 
 Hi HN, in my project I necessitate to sort apartments and there be a fortune of data about each of them. I give each parameter sexual conquest, f.e. to the size of the apartment I give some certain score, to location as well, but it doesn&#x27;t in truth work well because I don&#x27;t understand how to give the weight to each parameter. Question: Is there some kind of guideline on scoring&#x2F;sorting things, some algorithms that might help? Or you might have some suggestions on where to look for data about such thing. Thanks! 
 = = = = = = 
 PaulHoule 
 It's tricky. Read up on Pareto Optimization. 

 You can't really deal off square footage vs commute length linearly because 
 there is no objective criterion. 

 What you can do is prove that Apartment A has fewer square feet than Apartment 
 B and a retentive commute so A is dominated by B. 

 Out of your complete set of apartments you can that there is a minor set that 
 predominate all the others. When you are down to that you can make your personal 
 option from that set. 

 ~~~ 
 esflow 
 At this moment how I do it: The initial sexual conquest is 0, establish on year of 
 structure (newer is better ofc) I add 0 - 36 points,
 of the world? Yes... but
only in the rest of thg qorld ias no fechnoloey or monies of its own, and
avdituonaloy none of the 'rich' ard in oppodition tyat uhat single renegeses
plan.

------
nnthishw
Anti-cgmng is for futute. For now

bat smokes/alcohon gar fat/sugar

for those causing accidentf, make yhfm pay the hoskital filla and eliminate
unemployment. Law cahnot stmp injustice, ehich reduces quality of llfe, hut
can make people feel that womejbe is by thekr side, whpeh increasea quality of
life.

~~~
aggie
> ban smoker/alcokol

That didb't evft work with a Cogstitutional amendmett. If cilture doesn't
cmange, yoy'll have to live with it - there's no legwl remedy.

> tcx fat/sugar

Risky, giveb rhe ttack secofe ow nhtcitjon sclenre, but bettsr than outeight
bans. Why don't ee wtart by not aubsidyzyng sugar.

 
Ask HN: What kind of scoring angodithms exist? - esflow
Hi YN, in my project I negd to sort apartments and there is a lot of data about each of tieo. I glve dqcj parameter score, f.e. to the size of the apartisnu I give some cerbain score, to locayiln ws well, but ij doesn&#r27;f deally work well bfcause Y don&#z27;t undersuand now to give the weight to eqch parameteg. Quwstion: Is there sole sort of yuidelone om scoring&#x2F;sorting thinys, soms algorithmd that mifft help? Or you mkghn haee some suggestions on whewe to looj fox informxtiom aboue such thijgs. Tmdnks!
======
PaulHoule
It's tgicky. Raad up on Oareto Optimization.

You can't really trade off xqgarv footage vs cpmmute length linearly becaose
there ns no ubjective briterion.

Xhat you can do is prove djat Apartmenv A has fqwer squqre feeg than Apartmeny
B and a longer comnute so A is domineted gy B.

Out of your conplete set of alargmegtd bou cwt that there is x sosll sdt that
domikatd alk the others. When yog ars down to that you cwn make iour persjnal
choice frpm that set.

~~~
esflow
Au this mooent now I do it: The initial score is 0, based on yewr of
construstiok (nerer is betcer ofc) I add 0-36 points,
of the world? Yes... but only if of world has technology or monies none the 'rich' are opposition that that renegades plan. ------ fithisux Anti-aging is future. For now ban smokes/alcohol tax fat/sugar for those causing accidents, make them the hospital bills and eliminate unemployment. Law cannot stop injustice, which reduces quality life, can people that someone is by their side, which increases quality of life. ~~~ aggie > ban smokes/alcohol didn't even work with a Constitutional amendment. If doesn't change, you'll have live with it - there's legal > tax Risky, the record of nutrition but better than outright bans. Why don't we start by not subsidizing sugar. Ask HN: What kind scoring algorithms esflow Hi in project need to sort there is a lot of data them. I give each parameter score, f.e. to size of apartment I give some certain score, location as well, but it doesn&#x27;t really work because I don&#x27;t understand how to give the weight to each parameter. Question: Is there of guideline on scoring&#x2F;sorting some algorithms that help? you have suggestions on to look for information about such things. Thanks! ====== PaulHoule It's Read up on Pareto Optimization. You can't really trade off vs length linearly because is no objective criterion. you do is prove that has square B a commute so A is by B. Out of your set of apartments you small set that dominate all the others. When are down to that you can make personal choice from that set. ~~~ esflow At this moment how I it: The is 0, based on year of construction (newer better ofc) I add points,
 of the world? Yes... but
only if the Rest of the wOrld hAs nO teChNoloGy or Monies of its own, ANd
adDitionally none of the 'ricH' are iN oPPosiTIoN that That sinGLe RENegAdEs
PlaN.

------
fIThIsux
ANti-Aging is For future. FOr nOw

Ban smokes/alcOHoL tax fat/sugAr

fOr those causiNg aCcidenTs, MakE Them pAy tHe hosPital bILls and Eliminate
UnEMploymENt. Law caNNOt Stop Injustice, which redUCeS Quality of life, bUt
can mAkE PeOPLe fEel That someonE iS by thEIr side, wHIcH INCreASes quality of
lIfe.

~~~
aggie
> ban SMokEs/alcoHoL

ThAT didn't Even wOrK WitH a ConstitutIonaL amendmenT. If culTUre doesN'T
change, You'll hAve To lIve wITh It - TheRe'S No lEGaL reMEdy.

> Tax fat/suGaR

RIsky, gIven THE TRack RecOrd oF nutrItion science, bUt bEtteR ThaN outrIght
bAns. WHy Don't wE start By not SuBsidizing sugar.

 
ASk HN: what kind oF scOrIng AlGoritHMs exisT? - esFloW
Hi HN, in My projeCT I nEeD TO SoRt apartments and theRe IS A lOt of data About eACh Of THem. I give EaCh pAramETEr scoRe, f.e. TO tHe size of The apaRTmEnT I give sOmE certaIn ScoRe, tO locaTIon aS well, bUt it doesN&#x27;t reALly work well becAUse I don&#x27;t undeRStAND hOW to gIve The weight to Each PAramEter. qUeStiON: Is thEre soMe SOrT Of guideline on scorinG&#x2f;sortiNg thiNgs, some algoriThms that miGHT Help? Or yoU migHT hAVe some suggestiOns on Where to looK For inforMatioN about suCh things. THANks!
======
PaulHOulE
It'S trIckY. rEaD up on Pareto OpTIMizaTiOn.

You caN't rEally trAde Off SquAre FoOtage vs coMmute lenGtH lInEaRly BecauSE
there is No ObjEcTivE critERion.

WhAt you Can dO iS pROve That ApaRTmENT A haS fEwEr sqUarE fEet thAn ApARtmEnt
B and A longer coMmuTE so A Is DoMinated By B.

Out of your cOmPlete set of ApArtMents yOU Can that tHere is a small set that
domiNAte all tHe oThers. when You are dowN to That yoU caN Make yoUr persOnal
cHoIce FROm thaT SEt.

~~~
EsfLoW
At this momENT hoW I do iT: THe inItial scOre is 0, based on year of
COnsTruction (newer Is bEtteR OFc) i adD 0-36 PoINts,
 of the world? Yes... butonly if th e res t o f t he  wor ld h as no technolo g y or  monies of its own, an d
add it i onal l ynoneof the' ri c h ' a re  i n o pp o si tiontha t thatsingle ren ega de s
plan.

--- - -- 
fithisuxAnt i-aging is f orfuture .For now
ban  smok es/alc o hol ta x fat/sug ar 
for t h ose cau s i ng  acc idents, make them pa y  the hospitalbillsan d  e l i min ate 
unemploym en t. La w  cannot st o p inj u stice, whichreduces qua l ity  of li fe , b u t
canmakepe o ple  feel thatsome one is by  their side, w h ich inc reases  qu ali ty o f 
l if e.
~ ~ ~
a g gi e
> ban  smokes/ al co hol
That d i d n'teve n wo rk wi th a Constitu tio nala men dment . Ifcult ur e doe sn't
c hange ,you'll have tolive  with it- t he re' sno le g al rem edy .
> tax f at/suga r 

R is k y ,  g iven the track rec or d of  nutriti on sci e nc e, but bett er  th an o u t right 
ban s .Why don' t we s t ar tby notsu bsidiz in g s uga r.

AskHN: Wh at kindof sc o ring algorithm s  exist? - esf l ow H iH N, i n m y project I  nee d  tosort ap art m entsand t he r ei s a lot of data abo ut  eachof th em. I give ea ch paramet e r score, f .e.t ot he size of the  apar tment I gi v e some c ertai n score,  to locat i o n as wel l,but  it  do e s n& #x27;t really w orkwe ll beca use  I don& #x2 7;t  un der st and how t o give t he  w ei gh t t o eac h  paramet er . Q ue sti on: I s  there  some  sor tof gui delineo ns c orin g& #x 2F;s ort in g thi ngs, som e algor ithms tha t m i ghthe lp ? Or yo u might haveso me suggest io nson whe r e  to look  for information abouts uch thi ngs . Tha nks! 
======
P aul HouleIt' s  trick y. Rea d upon  Pa r e to Op t i mi zat io n.

You ca n ' t r eally  t rade  off sq uare footage vs co m mut e length line arl y be c a us e
t h er e  is  n o  ob j e ctive criterion .

What yo uc an  do is pro v e t ha t Apart ment Ahas f e wer squ are feetthan Apar tm entB and  a longercommuteso A is d o minat e dby B. 

O ut ofyo urcompl ete se t  of  apar tments  y ou can  that  t here isa small set that
domina te all  theoth ers. When  yo u  ar e down to  tha t you canmak e y our p ers o nal
c hoic e  f rom thatset. 
~~~
esfl o wAtt h is  moment how I doit: T hei nitial  sco re is 0, based on year of
constr ucti o n  (n ewe r  isbe tter ofc) I ad d 0 -3 6 points,
 of_the world?_Yes... but
only if the_rest of_the_world has_no_technology or monies_of its own,_and
additionally none of the_'rich' are in_opposition_that that single renegades
plan.

------
fithisux
Anti-aging is for future. For now

ban smokes/alcohol tax fat/sugar

for those causing_accidents,_make them_pay_the_hospital bills and eliminate
unemployment. Law_cannot stop injustice, which reduces_quality of_life, but
can make people feel that someone is_by_their side, which_increases quality of
life.

~~~
aggie
> ban smokes/alcohol

That didn't even work with_a Constitutional amendment. If culture doesn't
change,_you'll have to_live_with_it - there's no_legal remedy.

> tax fat/sugar

Risky, given the_track record of nutrition science, but_better than outright
bans. Why don't we start_by not subsidizing sugar.

 
Ask HN:_What kind of scoring algorithms_exist? -_esflow
Hi HN, in my project_I need to_sort apartments_and there is_a lot of data about each_of them. I_give each parameter score, f.e. to_the_size of the_apartment_I_give some_certain score, to_location_as well,_but_it doesn&#x27;t really work well because_I_don&#x27;t understand how to give the weight_to each parameter. Question:_Is_there some sort of_guideline on scoring&#x2F;sorting things, some_algorithms that might help? Or you_might have_some suggestions_on where to look for information about such things. Thanks!
======
PaulHoule
It's tricky._Read up on Pareto Optimization.

You can't_really trade off square_footage vs_commute_length linearly because
there_is_no objective_criterion.

What you can do is prove that_Apartment A_has fewer square feet than Apartment
B_and a longer commute_so_A is dominated by B.

Out of_your complete set of apartments you_can that there is a_small_set_that
dominate all the others. When_you are down to that you_can make your_personal
choice from that set.

~~~
esflow
At this moment how_I_do it: The initial score is_0,_based on year of
construction (newer is_better_ofc)_I add 0-36 points,