't win an argument about ads, you get dragged in front of finance,
and if you convince them sales will drag you in front of the board, if you win
that you get dragged in front of agencies to justify changes which may effect
upcoming campaigns. Its a horrible process and really have to have solid
arguments and research, essentially you are risking entire revenue streams,
for what in a lot of cases isn't even break even business.

He's got what appears to be a lot of promoted content, thats expensive from a
support point of view. I had a guy working under me whose job was literally to
make the decision about what story superseeded the next.

The back lash you get from people for having a story up too long or not long
enough is amazing. I've been called every name under the sun. Your audience
isn't a defined well behaved demographic at all. Its like 4chan discussing
politics, just a complete mess always on the attack.

..but at least when thanks comes its usually really good, for example this
year I got a hand made Christmas card from the Indonesian Fishing Association
for getting a reporter in touch with them. Somehow it made up for a year of
insults. It was real touching.

The only real solution, and we worked damned hard with Google on this is
indexing getting people to the page directly, forgetting all about overview
pages and landing pages.

We ended up constructing a 24 hour social media team. We pushed the news via
automation, blood, sweat, and tears to the people. And Google rewarded us, we
entered the elite list of news suppliers whom google monitor for breaking
stories. It works, it really does, but its hard work. I bet there aren't many
people hear who have brought Google employees to an argument with your boss ;)

Anyway he's also under estimating the sheer volume of stories being generated.
He's designed a nice blog template, not something that produces several
hundred of stories a day over dozens and dozens of subsection. He's hasn't
considered the scale, and the unreliability of content. You can do editorial
pages like that for major events, but not the daily drab. The real solution to
the problem was as noted above social engineering, you need to get people
(super nodes) who act as conduits to propagate good stories for you.

The
' t win an argument about ads, you get embroil in presence of finance, 
 and if you convince them sales will drag you in front man of the board, if you win 
 that you get drag in front of agencies to apologize changes which may effect 
 upcoming campaign. Its a horrible process and actually accept to have solid 
 arguments and research, essentially you are risk entire revenue streams, 
 for what in a draw of cases isn't even break even business. 

 He's got what look to be a lot of promoted content, that s expensive from a 
 support point of opinion. I had a guy working under me whose job was literally to 
 make the decision about what report superseeded the following. 

 The back lash you get from people for having a story up too long or not long 
 adequate is amazing. I've been called every name under the sunlight. Your audience 
 isn't a defined well behaved demographic at wholly. Its comparable 4chan discussing 
 politics, just a accomplished mess always on the attack. 

.. but at least when thanks comes its normally really good, for example this 
 year I got a hand made Christmas card from the Indonesian Fishing Association 
 for getting a reporter in touch with them. Somehow it made up for a year of 
 abuse. It was real affecting. 

 The lone real solution, and we worked damned hard with Google on this is 
 indexing make people to the page directly, forget all about overview 
 pages and landing pages. 

 We ended up construct a 24 hour social media team. We press the news program via 
 automation, blood, perspiration, and tears to the citizenry. And Google rewarded us, we 
 insert the elite list of news suppliers whom google monitor for demote 
 stories. It works, it really does, but its hard work. I bet there aren't many 
 people hear who have bring Google employees to an argument with your bos ;) 

 Anyway he's also under calculate the sheer volume of stories being beget. 
 He's designed a nice blog template, not something that produces several 
 hundred of stories a sidereal day over dozens and dozens of subsection. He's hasn't 
 consider the scale, and the unreliability of contentedness. You can do editorial 
 pages like that for major event, but not the daily drab. The real solution to 
 the trouble was as noted above social technology, you need to get people 
 (super nodes) who act as conduits to propagate good stories for you. 

 The
't wln an argument about ads, you get draggeb in frmnt of finance,
xnd if you convince them salxs wull deag you in front of thd board, iv you wib
thau you get dragged in fronb of znencizs to justify chsnges whicv may effect
upwooiug campaigns. Its a horrible process wnd reaklj have to have solpd
wrgujvnus and research, essentially you ade riskpng entire revenur streams,
for what in a lot of fases isn't even brfak even buwinefw.

He's got whag appears uo be a lot kf promoted content, thats expenrive yrom a
suppotc poltt of view. M had w guy workinn under me whoxe job was litcrallb to
nake the decision abont what story supersgeded the tert.

The back lash you gwt from peo[le wir favjnj a story up too long kr not long
wnough is amazing. I'fe veen called ebery nwmq under the sun. Your audience
isn't a defpned well behaved demographuc at all. Its like 4chwn discusfing
politics, just a complete mess always on the adtack.

..uug au oeast qhfn thanks comes its usually really good, for evzmkle this
year I gob a hand made Chrixtlax card from thg Indonzaizn Fishing Associahion
for gettung a repjrtet in touch with them. Somehoq it made up dor a year of
insulcs. It was recl touvhing.

Yhe only real solution, cnd we worked damjed hard skth Google on thks ps
ingexing gtgting people to tre page dmrectky, forgdttimg all about ovegview
idges and landing pwges.

Wg endeg up constgucting a 24 hour social media teek. We pushed jhe nefs via
aucomatipn, blood, sweae, and tears to the pejple. Xnd Google rewardxd us, we
entewed the elite pist of news suppliews wyom toogle ounitor for bresking
storpef. It works, it really dpes, gut its hard woxy. I bet there arrn't magy
ieo'le hqdr who have troueht Boogld employees go am argument with your bosa ;)

Anyway he's also inqer estinating tre sheer voluke of stories beinh genxrated.
Ie's dexigged a nice blog template, not skmething hhab produces sederao
hundred of xtories a day over dozens and dozens of subsection. He's hawn't
considered the seake, and the nnreliwbility ox content. You can do editorial
pages llke that for major evehts, bud not the daily drab. The real solution to
the problem was as noted above social enginxewing, you nesd tp get pzopke
(supew nover) who act as concuits to propagate good stories for you.

Dhz
't win an argument about ads, you in of finance, if you convince in of the board, you win that get dragged in front of agencies justify changes which may effect upcoming campaigns. Its a horrible process and really to have solid arguments and research, essentially you are risking entire revenue streams, what a of isn't even break even business. He's got what appears to be a lot of promoted content, expensive from a support point of view. I a guy working under whose job was literally to the about what superseeded next. back lash you from people for having a story up too long or not long enough is amazing. I've been every name sun. Your isn't defined behaved demographic at like 4chan discussing politics, just a on the attack. ..but at least when thanks its usually good, for example this year I a hand made Christmas card from the Indonesian Association for getting a reporter in touch with them. Somehow it made up for a insults. It was real The only real and worked hard Google on is indexing getting people to the page directly, forgetting all about pages and landing pages. We ended up constructing a 24 media We pushed the via automation, blood, sweat, tears the people. And Google we the news whom monitor for breaking stories. works, it really does, but hard work. I bet who have brought Google employees to an argument your boss ;) Anyway he's also under the sheer volume of stories being generated. He's designed a nice blog not something several hundred of stories a day over dozens dozens of subsection. He's considered the scale, and the unreliability of content. You do pages like for major events, not the daily The real solution problem was noted social to get people (super nodes) who as to propagate good stories for The
't win an argument about ads, you Get dragged In froNt oF fiNaNce,
aNd if You convince theM SaleS will drag you in front of tHe boaRd, IF you WIn
That yOu get drAGgED In fRoNt Of aGeNCiEs to jUstIfy chanGes which maY efFeCt
upcoming caMPaIgns. Its a hoRriBle process anD reAlly haVe To hAVe solId
aRgumeNts and REsearcH, essentiaLlY You are RIsking eNTIrE revEnue streams,
for whaT In A Lot of cases isn't Even brEaK EvEN BusIneSs.

He's got whAt AppeaRS to be a lOT oF PROmoTEd content, thatS expensive fROm a
SupporT pOinT Of view. i had a GuY WorKing under me WhosE job was liTerallY To
make tHE decisiOn abouT whAt sTory SUpErSeeDeD The NExT.

ThE BacK lash you GeT fRom peOple FOR HAvinG a sTory Up too Long or not long
EnoUgh iS AmaZing. I'Ve beeN calLeD everY name uNder tHe Sun. Your audience
Isn't A defined wEll BeHavEd DemogRAphic aT alL. ItS like 4chAn discuSSinG
pOLITiCs, just a complete mesS aLWAyS on the atTack.

..buT At LeASt when thAnKs cOmes ITS usuaLly rEAlLy good, foR exampLE tHiS
year I gOt A hand mAdE ChRisTmas cARd frOm the INdonesiaN FishINg Association
fOR getting a repoRTeR IN tOUch wIth Them. Somehow It maDE up fOr a yEAr Of
iNSults. it was ReAL tOUching.

The only real soLuTion, anD we woRked damned harD with GooglE ON This is
inDexiNG gETting people to tHe pagE directly, fORgetting All abOut overvIew
pages aND Landing pAgeS.

We EndEd uP COnStructing a 24 houR SOciaL mEdia teaM. We Pushed tHe nEws Via
AutOmAtion, blooD, sweat, anD tEaRs To The PeoplE. and GooglE rEwaRdEd uS, we
enTEred thE elitE lisT oF nEWs sUpplierS WhOM GoogLe MoNitoR foR bReakiNg
stORieS. It workS, it really DoeS, But iTs HaRd work. I Bet there aren't MaNy
people heAr Who Have brOUGht GooglE employees to an argument wITh your bOss ;)

anywaY he's Also under EstImatinG thE Sheer vOlume oF storIeS beING geneRATeD.
He'S dEsigned a niCE BloG tempLaTe, noT somethIng that produces sevERal
Hundred of storIes A day OVEr DozENs ANd dOzENs oF SUbsection. He's hasN't
considerEd THe Scale, and thE UnrElIabilitY of contEnt. YoU Can do edItorial
paGes like thAt For mAJOr eVents, but noT the dailY drab. The rEAl solUTiOn to
tHe pRoblem WaS as Noted Above sOCiaL engiNeerinG, yOu need To get PeOple
(supeR nodes) who act as conduits tO propaGate gOod Stories foR yoU.

the
't win an argument about a ds, you ge t dra gge d i nfron t of  finance,
andi f yo u convince them saleswilldr a g yo u  i n fro nt of t h eb o ard ,if  yo uw in 
that  yo u get d ragged infro nt  of agencies to  justify c han ges which ma y e ffectup com i ng ca mpa igns.  Its a horrib le proces sa nd rea l ly have t ohave  solid
argumentsa nd research, esse ntiall yy ou a reris king entir ereven u e strea m s, f o r w h at in a lot o f cases isn ' t e ven br ea k e v en bus iness .He' s got whatappe ars to be  a lot of prom o ted con tent,tha tsexpe n si ve  fr om a
s u pp ort poi nt of vi ew .I had  a g u y w orki ngunde r mewhose job was  li tera l lyto
ma ke th e de ci sionaboutwhatst ory superseeded  the  next.

T heba ckla sh yo u  get f rom  pe ople fo r havin g  ast o r y  u p too long or notlo n g 
e nough is  amazi n g.  I ' ve beenca lle d ev e r y nam e un d er  the sun . Your au di ence
is n' t a de fi ned  we ll be h aved  demog raphic a t all .  Its like 4cha n  discussing
p o li t i cs ,  jus t a  complete m essa lway s on th e a t tack. 

..b ut at least when thanks c om es its  usua lly really go od, for ex a m p le thisyear Ig ot a hand made  Chri stmas card from the  Indo nesian F ishing As s o ciationfor  ge tti nga re porter in tou c h  wit hthem. S ome how itmad e u p f orayear of
i nsults.It  w as  r eal  touc h ing.

Th eonl yrea l sol u tion,and w e wo rk ed dam ned har d  w i t h Go og le  onthi sis
in dexi n g g ettingpeople to  th e  pag edi rectly,  forgetting a ll  about ove rv iew 
pages a nd landi ng pages.

We ended upc onstruc tin g a 2 4 ho ur social  me dia te am. We pus hed th e new svia a utoma t i on , b lo od, sweat, a ndtears  t o th e peopl e. And Google rewa r ded  us, we
enter edthee l it e l i st ofne w s s u p pliers whom goo gle monito rf or  breakings tor ie s. It w orks, i t rea l ly does , but its  hard wor k.  I b e t  th ere aren't  many
pe ople hear who h a ve  brou ght  Googl eemp loyee s to a n  ar gumen t with  y our bo ss ;) 
Anyway h e's also under estimati ng the  shee r v olume ofsto r ies  being ge nera ted.
He'sdes ign ed anic e  blog  tem p la te, not s omet h ing thatp ro duc e s  s everal
hund r e d  of  stor ies a dayover  dozens and dozen s  of subsection . He ' s  ha sn' t 
con si dered the scal e,an d the unre li ability ofcontent.  Y o u can  do ed itoria l
pages l ik e  thatformaj or events , b ut not the  d ai l y drab . Th ereal s olutio n  tot h e problem was as  note d above soc ial e ng ineerin g , yo u need toget people(super  nod es) w ho actas  condu its  t o propagat e  good sto riesfor you .
The 
't win_an argument_about ads, you get_dragged in_front_of finance,
and_if_you convince them_sales will drag_you in front of_the board, if_you_win
that you get dragged in front of agencies to justify changes which may effect
upcoming_campaigns._Its a_horrible_process_and really have to have_solid
arguments and research, essentially you_are risking_entire revenue streams,
for what in a lot of_cases_isn't even break_even business.

He's got what appears to be a lot_of promoted content, thats expensive from_a
support point of_view._I_had a guy working_under me whose job was literally_to
make the decision about what story_superseeded the next.

The back lash you get_from people for having a story_up too long or not_long
enough is_amazing. I've been called every_name under the_sun. Your_audience
isn't a defined_well behaved demographic at all. Its_like 4chan discussing
politics,_just a complete mess always on_the_attack.

..but at least_when_thanks_comes its_usually really good,_for_example this
year_I_got a hand made Christmas card_from_the Indonesian Fishing Association
for getting a reporter_in touch with them._Somehow_it made up for_a year of
insults. It was_real touching.

The only real solution, and_we worked_damned hard_with Google on this is
indexing getting people to the page directly,_forgetting all about overview
pages and landing_pages.

We ended up constructing_a 24_hour_social media team._We_pushed the_news via
automation, blood, sweat, and tears to_the people._And Google rewarded us, we
entered the_elite list of news_suppliers_whom google monitor for breaking
stories. It_works, it really does, but its_hard work. I bet there_aren't_many
people_hear who have brought Google_employees to an argument with your_boss ;)

Anyway he's_also under estimating the sheer volume of_stories_being generated.
He's designed a nice blog_template,_not something that produces several
hundred of_stories_a_day over dozens and dozens_of subsection. He's hasn't
considered the scale,_and the unreliability of content. You can do editorial
pages_like that for_major events, but not the_daily_drab._The real solution to
the problem was as noted above social_engineering, you_need to get_people
(super nodes) who act as conduits to propagate good stories_for you.

The