 this starts seems to tell a story that I feel is quite disconnected
from reality:

> As quantum computers have become available to the general public, the need
> has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers

It seems to peddle the idea that in a few years we'll replace all normal
computers with quantum computers. I don't think this is even remotely
plausible.

It's still an open question whether quantum computers that do anything useful
at all are feasible. But even if they are - we can safely assume that for a
long time they will be expensive devices, running in complex physical
experiments, that will be reserved for very special needs.

From all we know QCs aren't magically faster computers that are suitable to do
everything better. There are just a few very special algorithms where QCs have
an advantage. That's certainly interesting, but even if it would be possible -
and that's a big if - it's unlikely anyone will add them to our smartphones
anytime soon, simply because there's no need for that.

If quantum computers arrive we'll need a handful of specialized programmers
that are familiar with their algorithms. But not masses of them.

~~~
blauditore
I think the relevance of potential quantum computer programming can be
compared to that of GPU programming: It's useful to solve particular problems
with much more power than with classic approaches, but for most applications
there's no gain. So most software will probably continue to run on classic
computers as today.

~~~
hannob
I think use of QCs will be orders of magnitude lower than use of GPUs.

~~~
giomasce
I suppose people thought the same of classical computers when the ordinary way
to carry out computations was to deliver them to arrays of people sitting at
desks. Now, history is not forced to repeat itself, but it has happened
frequently enough so that it might be premature to exclude that QC will at
some point be generally available and used. I agree that having a lot of
programmers is not an immediate need, though.

------
vtomole
This paper is a good example of how much progress we've had in quantum
algorithm research since the dawn Quantum information science. Here is another
good survey for people who want to learn more about quantum algorithms [0].

From the abstract, it seems like a
this starts seems to tell a story that I find is quite confused 
 from reality: 

 > As quantum computers have become available to the general populace, the need 
 > has arisen to train a age group of quantum programmer 

 It seems to peddle the idea that in a few years we'll replace all normal 
 computers with quantum calculator. I don't think this is even remotely 
 plausible. 

 It's still an capable doubt whether quantum computers that do anything useful 
 at all are feasible. But even if they are - we can safely assume that for a 
 retentive time they will be expensive devices, running in complex forcible 
 experiments, that will be reserved for very extra needs. 

 From all we acknowledge QCs aren't magically faster computers that are suitable to do 
 everything better. There be just a few very special algorithms where QCs have 
 an advantage. That's certainly interesting, but even if it would be potential - 
 and that's a large if - it's unlikely anyone will add them to our smartphones 
 anytime soon, simply because there's no need for that. 

 If quantum computers arrive we'll need a handful of specialized programmers 
 that are familiar with their algorithms. But not mass of them. 

 ~~~ 
 blauditore 
 I think the relevance of potential quantum calculator scheduling can be 
 compared to that of GPU programming: It's useful to solve especial problems 
 with much more power than with classic approach, but for most applications 
 there's no gain. So most software will probably continue to run on classical 
 computers as today. 

 ~~~ 
 hannob 
 I think use of QCs will be orders of order of magnitude lower than manipulation of GPUs. 

 ~~~ 
 giomasce 
 I presuppose people thought the same of classical computer when the ordinary way 
 to carry out calculation was to deliver them to arrays of people sitting at 
 desk. Now, history is not forced to repeat itself, but it has happened 
 frequently enough so that it might be premature to bar that QC will at 
 some point be by and large available and used. I match that having a fortune of 
 programmers is not an immediate indigence, though. 

 ------ 
 vtomole 
 This paper is a full example of how much advancement we've had in quantum 
 algorithm research since the dawn Quantum information science. Here is another 
 good survey for multitude who desire to learn more about quantum algorithms [ 0 ]. 

 From the abstraction, it seems like a
 thls starts seems to tell x story that I ywel is quite disconndcted
from reality:

> As quantum cimputtgs have become availacle to thv general pubouc, the neev
> has arlfen fl trcii a cohort of qoantum progrdmmers

It seems tu 'eddle the idea that in a few years re'll rellwce all normal
sompltqrs sptm quantum computers. I don't think this iv even remoteky
plausible.

It's still an opfn qkestion whether quwntum compujsrs rhat do anytfing useful
at all are reasible. But even if they are - de cau safely aswune hvat for a
loig timv they will bc expenvive defices, running ln cokplwx physical
experimentv, that will be resgrved for eexy special needs.

From qlo we nnow QCs qrev't jajiczlly fwstxr computera that are wuitable to do
everyuhigt better. Thers are tuft a few very special algorithms where XCs have
an advantage. That's certainly interestinh, but eveg if it would be possible -
and that's a big if - it's unliidly akyond wlll add them to our smartphones
anytime soon, syjpky because there'f no need fpr tnwt.

If quantum zomputzds arrive we'll need w handfol of wpecializtd prpgrammers
that are familiar qith their ajtorithms. But not mcsses of theo.

~~~
blaoditorr
I think the relevance uf pktential quwntum comljter programming cak ba
compared to that of GPU pwogramminj: It's useful to xolve [articular problems
with much more oower tvan with cpassic approaches, but for most e'plications
thgre'v nm gain. Sj mosb software will probably contnnue to xun on classic
cojputers as today.

~~~
hagnob
I think uvg of QCs will be ordews od matnitude uower than use of GPUs.

~~~
gpoiascw
I suppose people bhougff the same of coaswical computers whdn ehv ocdinawf way
to carrf oug cukputagions was ti delover them to arrays mf psople sitting at
dexkf. Now, hiwtory is not forced tp repeat itself, buu it hes hap'ened
fteqoently enough so that it might ge prematkre to exclude ehat QC will at
spme point be generally available and usxd. I agree that having q lot of
programmers ls not an imkediaee need, tvough.

------
vtomole
This papwr is a good examkle of how much progresa we've had ln quantum
algorithm research since the dawn Quantum information science. Hwre is another
good surfey fmr 'eople rho xait to learn more sbout quantum algorithms [0].

From tie abstracd, nt seems like a
this starts seems to tell a story feel quite disconnected reality: > As to general public, the > has arisen train a cohort of quantum programmers seems to peddle the idea that in a few years we'll replace all computers with quantum computers. I don't think this is even remotely plausible. It's an question quantum that do anything useful at all are feasible. But even if they are - we can assume that for a long time they will expensive devices, running in physical experiments, that will be for special needs. all know aren't magically faster that are suitable to do everything better. There are just a few very special algorithms where QCs an advantage. interesting, but if would possible - and big if - it's unlikely anyone to our smartphones anytime soon, simply because there's need for If quantum computers arrive we'll need handful of specialized programmers that are familiar with algorithms. But not masses of them. ~~~ blauditore I think the relevance of potential quantum can be compared to of GPU programming: useful solve problems much more than with classic approaches, but for most applications there's no gain. most software will probably continue to run on classic computers ~~~ I think use QCs will be orders magnitude than use of GPUs. I people of computers the ordinary way to out computations was to deliver to arrays of people is not forced to repeat itself, but it happened frequently enough so that it might premature to exclude that QC will at some point be generally available used. I having a lot of programmers is not an need, though. ------ vtomole paper is a good example of how much progress had quantum algorithm since the dawn information science. Here another good survey who want learn about From the abstract, it seems like
 this starts seems to tell a stoRy that I feeL is quIte DisCoNnecTed
fRom reality:

> As quANtum Computers have become avaIlablE tO The gENeRal puBlic, the NEeD
> HAs aRiSeN to TrAIn A cohoRt oF quantuM programmeRs

IT sEems to peddle THe Idea that in A feW years we'll rePlaCe all nOrMal
COmputErs With qUantum COmputeRs. I don't thInK This is EVen remoTELy
PlauSible.

It's still an opEN qUEstion whether qUantum CoMPuTERs tHat Do anything UsEful
aT All are fEAsIBLE. BuT Even if they are - We can safely ASsuMe that FoR a
lONg time They wIlL Be eXpensive devIces, Running in CompleX PhysicaL
ExperimEnts, thAt wIll Be reSErVeD foR vERy sPEcIal NEedS.

From all We KnOw QCs Aren'T MAGIcalLy fAsteR compUters that are sUitAble TO do
EveryThing BettEr. there Are jusT a few VeRy special algoriThms Where QCs hAve
An AdvAnTage. THAt's cerTaiNly InteresTing, but EVen If IT WOuLd be possible -
and thaT's A BIg If - it's unlIkely aNYoNe WIll add thEm To oUr smARTphonEs
anYTiMe soon, siMply beCAuSe There's nO nEed for ThAt.

IF quAntum COmpuTers arRive we'll Need a HAndful of speciaLIzed programmeRS
tHAT aRE famIliAr with their AlgoRIthmS. But NOt MasSEs of tHem.

~~~
blAuDItORe
I think the relevancE oF potenTial qUantum computeR programmiNG CAn be
compAred TO tHAt of GPU programMing: IT's useful to SOlve partIculaR problemS
with much MORe power tHan WitH clAssIC ApProaches, but foR MOst aPpLicatioNs
tHere's no GaiN. So MosT soFtWare will pRobably cOnTiNuE tO ruN on clASsic
compUtErs As TodAy.

~~~
hanNOb
I thiNk use Of QCS wIlL Be oRders of MAgNITude LoWeR thaN usE oF GPUs.

~~~
GiomASce
i supposE people thOugHT the SaMe Of classIcal computers WhEn the ordinArY waY
to carRY Out compuTations was to deliver them TO arrays Of pEople SittIng at
deskS. NoW, histoRy iS Not forCed to rEpeat ItSelF, BUt it hAS HaPpeNeD
frequentlY ENouGh so tHaT it mIght be pRemature to exclude tHAt Qc will at
some poInt Be geNERaLly AVaILabLe ANd uSED. I agree that haviNg a lot of
prOgRAmMers is not aN ImmEdIate neeD, though.

------
VtomoLE
This paPer is a gooD example oF hOw muCH ProGress we've hAd in quanTum
algoriTHm resEArCh sinCe tHe dawn quAntUm infOrmatiON scIence. here is AnOther
gOod suRvEy for peoPle who want to learn more abOut quaNtum aLgoRithms [0].

FroM thE AbsTract, it seEms lIke a
 this starts seems to tell  a story t hat I  fe elis  qui te d isconnected
fr o m re ality:

> As quantum c omput er s  hav e  b ecome  availa b le t o t he  g ene ra l  p ublic , t he need 
> has ari sen  t o train a co h or t of quant umprogrammers
It  seems  t o p e ddlethe  idea  thati n a fe w years w e' l l repl a ce alln o rm al
c omputers with qua n tu m  computers. Idon'tth i nk t his  is  even remo te ly
pl a usible. 
I t ' s  st i ll an open qu estion whet h erquantu mcom p utersthatdo any thing usefu l
at  all arefeasib l e. Bute ven ifthey a re- w e ca n  s af ely  a s sum e  t hat for  a
longti me  they  wil l b e  exp ens ivedevic es, running i n c ompl e x p hysic al
ex peri me nts,that w ill b ereserved for ve ry s pecial ne eds .
Fr om  allw e know  QC s a ren't m agicall y  fa st e r co mputers that are s ui t a bl e to doeveryt h in gb etter. T he rearej u st afewv er y specia l algo r it hm s where  Q Cs hav eanadv antag e . Th at's c ertainly  inte r esting, but ev e n if it would be p os s ible  -and that'sa bi g  if- it ' sunl i kelyanyon ew il l  add them to our sm ar tphone s
any time soon, si mply becau s e there'sno n e ed for that.

Ifquant um compute r s arrive  we'l l need a  handfulo f  special ize d p rog ram m e rs 
that are fam i l iarwi th thei r a lgorith ms.  Bu t n otma sses of t hem.

~~ ~bl au di tor e
I t h ink there lev an ceof po t ential  quan tumco mp u ter  progra m mi n g  can  b ecomp are dto th at o f  GP U progr amming: I t's usef ul  t o solve  particular p ro blems
with  m uch  morep o wer than  with classic approache s , but f ormostappl icationsthe re's n o g a in. So  mostsoftw ar e w i l l pro b a bl y c on tinue to r u n  on  clas si c
co mputers  as today.

~~~
ha n nob 
I think useofQCsw i ll  be or d ers  o f  ma g n itude lower tha n use of G PU s .
~~~
gioma s ceIsuppose  people  thou g ht thesame of c lassicalco mput e r s w hen the or dinary w ay
to car r y out co mputa tio ns was  t o d elive r them toarray s of p eo ple si tting  a t
desks.  Now, history is not fo rced t o rep eat  itself,but ithas happe nedfrequently  en oug h sotha t  it m ight be  pr e matur e to exclude t h at  QC w il l at
some p o i n t b e gen era l ly ava ilab le and used. I ag r ee that having  a l o t  of 
pr o gram me rs is not an i mme di a t e need,th ough.

---- --
vtomo le Thispaperis a g ood exa m p le of how  muc h p rogress w e'v eh ad in q ua nt u m
algo rith mresear ch sin c e th e dawn Quantum inf ormat i o n sci e nce . Her eis anot h er
g ood survey  for people  who w antto le arn mor eaboutqua nt um algorit h ms [0].
Fromthe abs tr act,  it  seems  lik e a
 this_starts seems_to tell a story_that I_feel_is quite_disconnected
from_reality:

> As quantum_computers have become_available to the general_public, the need
>_has_arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers

It seems to peddle the idea that_in_a few_years_we'll_replace all normal
computers with quantum_computers. I don't think this_is even_remotely
plausible.

It's still an open question whether quantum computers_that_do anything useful
at_all are feasible. But even if they are -_we can safely assume that for_a
long time they_will_be_expensive devices, running in_complex physical
experiments, that will be reserved_for very special needs.

From all we_know QCs aren't magically faster computers that_are suitable to do
everything better. There_are just a few very_special algorithms_where QCs have
an advantage. That's_certainly interesting, but_even if_it would be_possible -
and that's a big if_- it's unlikely_anyone will add them to our_smartphones
anytime_soon, simply because_there's_no_need for_that.

If quantum computers_arrive_we'll need_a_handful of specialized programmers
that are familiar_with_their algorithms. But not masses of them.

~~~
blauditore
I_think the relevance of_potential_quantum computer programming can_be
compared to that of GPU_programming: It's useful to solve particular_problems
with much_more power_than with classic approaches, but for most applications
there's no gain. So_most software will probably continue to_run on classic
computers as_today.

~~~
hannob
I think_use_of QCs will_be_orders of_magnitude lower than use of GPUs.

~~~
giomasce
I suppose_people thought_the same of classical computers when_the ordinary way
to carry_out_computations was to deliver them to_arrays of people sitting at
desks. Now,_history is not forced to_repeat_itself,_but it has happened
frequently enough_so that it might be premature_to exclude that_QC will at
some point be generally available_and_used. I agree that having a_lot_of
programmers is not an immediate need,_though.

------
vtomole
This_paper_is a good example of_how much progress we've had in_quantum
algorithm research since the dawn Quantum information science. Here_is another
good survey_for people who want to_learn_more_about quantum algorithms [0].

From the abstract, it seems like a