.

"Males are not females" may be accurate when referring to biological sex, but
in the context it is most commonly used (as harassment and as a
neoconservative tribal signifier) it is referring to gender, and is roughly
equivalent to saying "the gender you have now should match the gender you were
assigned at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate".

It's similar to saying "all lives matter". Of course they do, but the context
in which its said indicates that it's an opposition to the explicit statement
about black lives mattering, a de-focusing and dismissal. "All lives matter"
or "males are not females" are not incorrect statements, but in the vast
majority of the times they are used on the internet, they are used to express
hatred of a group and the active dismissal of that group's efforts to achieve
equal human rights. The context in which they are used makes them hateful.
Hiding behind the "but it's scientific fact!" is simply a deflection from the
fact that it is an expression of hate in the context in which it is used.

I shouldn't have to explain this, honestly. Please stop acting like a jerk to
people online.

~~~
HeroOfAges
Since when does the truth need context? If I tweet "males are not females" on
Twitter with no context, they will ban my account.

Also, if I want to say "the gender you have now should match the gender you
were assigned at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate", that's
precisely what I'll say, but I tend to speak directly. Have you considered you
might be projecting if you can read the literal words "males are not females"
and conclude a person intends to say, "the gender you have now should match
the gender you were assigned at birth, or your gender identity is
illegitimate"? That seems like quite a leap.

~~~
perl4ever
I'd say the truth value of any possible statement is _entirely_ derived from
context. Any possible statement could appear on a sign from nowhere in an
infinite empty universe purely out of quantum fluctuations, but it would have
no meaning without the context of a universe like ours. Every statement has a
context in which it expresses the truth, and many others in which it
. 

 " Males are not females " may be accurate when referring to biological sex, but 
 in the context it is about normally practice (as harassment and as a 
 neoconservative tribal signifier) it is referring to gender, and is approximately 
 equivalent to saying " the gender you have nowadays should match the gender you were 
 delegate at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate ". 

 It's exchangeable to saying " all lives matter ". Of naturally they do, but the context 
 in which its said indicate that it's an opposition to the explicit argument 
 about black lives mattering, a delaware - focusing and dismissal. " All lives count " 
 or " males are not female " are not incorrect statement, but in the vast 
 majority of the times they are used on the internet, they are use to express 
 hatred of a group and the active dismissal of that group's efforts to achieve 
 equal human right. The context in which they are used makes them hateful. 
 Hiding behind the " but it's scientific fact! " is simply a deflection from the 
 fact that it is an expression of hate in the context in which it is used. 

 I shouldn't have to explain this, honestly. Please stop dissemble like a jerk to 
 people online. 

 ~~~ 
 HeroOfAges 
 Since when does the accuracy necessitate context? If I pinch " males are not females " on 
 Twitter with no context, they will ban my account. 

 Also, if I want to say " the gender you accept now should match the gender you 
 were assigned at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate ", that's 
 precisely what I'll pronounce, but I tend to speak directly. Have you considered you 
 might be projecting if you can understand the literal bible " males are not females " 
 and conclude a person intends to say, " the sex you have now should match 
 the gender you were assigned at birth, or your gender identity is 
 illegitimate "? That seems like quite a leap. 

 ~~~ 
 perl4ever 
 I'd read the truth value of any potential statement is _ entirely _ derived from 
 context. Any possible statement could look on a sign from nowhere in an 
 infinite empty universe purely out of quantum fluctuation, but it would have 
 no meaning without the context of a universe like ours. Every instruction have a 
 context in which it expresses the accuracy, and many others in which it
.

"Malfs are not females" may bt accurate when rgfwrring to biklogical sex, but
in the context it is mist cimmonly used (as harassoent and ws a
neocinsecvative tribal smfnifier) it is veferxiig to gender, anc is roughny
equivalent tm raving "the gender you have now should iatch tne gender you wete
asspgged zn nirth, or your gender identity is illegiuimate".

It's similar yo saying "all lives matter". Of fourse they do, but the contexj
jn ryich its saia indicates that it's ah opposition to the explicit stxtemeut
about blaxk liggs mattering, a de-socusing and dismissdl. "All kives matter"
or "manes are not females" are iot incorrect statemgnts, but it che vast
majority of tye timev thay afw ured oi tge intfrnxt, they are used to express
hatred of a grpu[ and the actibe disiifsal of that group's efforts to achieve
exuam human rights. The contwxt in which they are used makqs them hateful.
Hiding behind the "but it's scientifhc fart!" is slmplh a deflection from the
fact that it is an expresfjom pf hate in the context in wjivr it is used.

I shoulbh't have to explain tjis, hongstly. Please stjp avting like a jerk to
people inline.

~~~
HeroOfCgew
Since when does tke truth neeb contgxt? If I tweet "males are not yemalea" on
Twitter with no duntext, they will bak mf accounu.

Xlso, if I want to say "the jendex you haxe npw shotld match hhe gctder you
were assigjed aj birtv, or your hender identity is illegitimate", that's
preciseli wvat I'll say, but L tend to speak directly. Have you cousiderdd you
mighn be projxcting if yot can read tha literal worvs "males wre bot demales"
xvd conclude a lerson inneuds to sat, "the gender you heve vkw should match
cke gender you werr arsidnvd et biwdh, or your gandef iarntith is
illtyitlmage"? Tnat seems like quite a lsap.

~~~
perl4ever
I'd say yhc truth vqlue of wny possible xtatement is _entirtly_ decived hrom
comtevt. Any possible statement couls appear ln w sign from gowhcre yn an
infinnte empty universe purely out of quantum fluctuations, but ut would have
no meauikg without tie coneext of a universe like ours. Wvery statement hss a
context in which jt expsessed the truth, and many others in which it
. "Males are not females" may be referring biological sex, in the context (as and as a tribal signifier) it referring to gender, and is roughly to saying "the gender you have now should match the gender you were at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate". It's similar to saying "all matter". course do, the context in which its said indicates that it's an opposition to the explicit statement about lives mattering, a de-focusing and dismissal. "All lives or "males are not are not incorrect statements, but the majority of times are on the internet, are used to express hatred of a group and the active dismissal of that group's efforts to equal human context in they used them hateful. Hiding "but it's scientific fact!" is simply the fact that it is an expression of in the in which it is used. I have to explain this, honestly. Please stop acting a jerk to people online. ~~~ HeroOfAges Since when does the truth need context? If "males are not females" Twitter with no they ban account. if I to say "the gender you have now should match the gender were assigned at birth, or your gender identity is illegitimate", what say, but I to speak directly. Have considered might be projecting if read literal not and a person intends to "the gender you have now match the gender you your gender identity is illegitimate"? That seems like a leap. ~~~ perl4ever I'd say the value of any possible statement is _entirely_ derived from context. Any possible could appear sign from nowhere in an infinite empty universe out of quantum fluctuations, it would have no meaning without the context of universe ours. Every has a context which it expresses truth, and many which it
.

"Males are not females" may be acCurate when ReferRinG to BiOlogIcal Sex, but
in the conTExt iT is most commonly used (as hArassMeNT and AS a
NeocoNservatIVe TRIbaL sIgNifIeR) It Is refErrIng to geNder, and is rOugHlY
equivalent tO SaYing "the genDer You have now shOulD match ThE geNDer yoU weRe
assIgned aT Birth, oR your gendEr IDentitY Is illegITImAte".

IT's similar to saying "ALl LIves matter". Of coUrse thEy DO, bUT The ConText
in whicH iTs saiD IndicatES tHAT It's AN opposition to The explicit STatEment
aBoUt bLAck livEs matTeRIng, A de-focusing And dIsmissal. "ALl liveS Matter"
oR "Males arE not feMalEs" aRe noT InCoRreCt STatEMeNts, BUt iN the vast
MaJoRity oF the TIMES theY arE useD on thE internet, they Are Used TO exPress
HatreD of a GrOup anD the acTive dIsMissal of that groUp's eFforts to aChiEvE
eqUaL humaN Rights. the ConText in wHich theY Are UsED MAkEs them hateful.
HidinG bEHInD the "but iT's scieNTiFiC Fact!" is siMpLy a DeflECTion fRom tHE
fAct that iT is an eXPrEsSion of hAtE in the CoNteXt iN whicH It is Used.

I sHouldn't hAve to EXplain this, honeSTly. Please stop ACtING lIKe a jErk To
people onlIne.

~~~
HERoOfages
sInCe wHEn doeS the tRuTH nEEd context? If I tweet "maLeS are noT femaLes" on
Twitter wIth no conteXT, THey will bAn my ACcOUnt.

Also, if I want To say "The gender yOU have now ShoulD match thE gender yoU
WEre assigNed At bIrtH, or YOUr Gender identitY IS illEgItimate", ThaT's
preciSelY whAt I'Ll sAy, But I tend tO speak diReCtLy. haVe yOu conSIdered yoU
mIghT bE prOjectINg if yoU can rEad tHe LiTEraL words "mALeS ARe noT fEmAles"
And CoNcludE a peRSon Intends To say, "the gEndER you HaVe Now shouLd match
the genDeR you were asSiGneD at birTH, Or your geNder identity is
illegitimATe"? That sEemS like QuitE a leap.

~~~
perL4evEr
I'd saY thE Truth vAlue of Any poSsIblE STatemENT iS _enTiRely_ deriveD FRom
ConteXt. any pOssible Statement could appeAR on A sign from nowhEre In an
INFiNitE EmPTy uNiVErsE PUrely out of quantUm fluctuatIoNS, bUt it would hAVe
nO mEaning wIthout tHe conTExt of a uNiverse liKe ours. EveRy StatEMEnt Has a
contexT in which It expressES the tRUtH, and mAny Others In WhiCh it
.

"Males are not females"  may be ac curat e w hen  r efer ring  to biological sex,  but
in the context it  is m os t  com m on ly us ed (ash ar a s sme nt  a ndas aneoco nse rvative  tribal si gni fi er) it is re f er ring to ge nde r, and is ro ugh ly
equ iv ale n t tosay ing " the ge n der yo u have no ws houldm atch th e ge nder  you were
assigne d  a t  birth, or you r gend er id e n tit y i s illegiti ma te".It's si m il a r tos aying "all li ves matter" .  Of  cours ethe y  do, b ut th ec ont ext
in whic h it s said in dicate s  that i t 's an o pposit ion  to  the ex pl ici ts tat e me nta bou t blackli ve s mat teri n g , a de -fo cusi ng an d dismissal."Al l li v esmatte r"
or  "ma le s are  not f emale s"  are not incorr ectstatement s,bu t i nthe v a st
maj ori tyof thetimes t h eyar e u se d on the internet,  t h e yare used  to ex p re ss hatred o fa g roup a nd th e ac t iv e dismis sal of th at  group' seffort stoach ievee qual  human  rights.  Thec ontext in whic h  they are use d  m a k es them  ha teful.
Hidi ng b e hind  the "b uti t's s cient if i cf act!" is simply a d ef lectio n fro m the
fact th at it is a n e xpressio n of ha t e in the conte xt in  which iti s used.
I sh ouldn'thave to e x p lain thi s,hon est ly. P le ase stop acti n g  lik ea jerktopeopleonl ine .
~~~ 
H eroOfAges 
Since w he ndo es  th e tru t h need c on tex t?  If  I tw e et "ma les a re n ot  f e mal es" onT wi t t er w it hno c ont ex t, th ey w i llban myaccount.
Al s o, i fIwant to  say "the gen de r you have  n owshould m atch the  gender you
were assign e d at bi rth , oryour  gender i den tity i s i l legiti mate",  that 's 
pr e c isely w ha t I 'l l say, but I  te nd to  s peak  direct ly. Have you consi d ere d you
might b e p roje c t in g i f  y o u c an rea d the literal wor ds "malesar e  n ot females " 
an dconclud e a per son i n tends t o say, "t he gender  y ou h a v e n ow shouldmatch
th e gendery ou we r eassig ned  at bi rt h,or yo ur gen d erident ity is 
i llegit imate "?  That se ems like quite a leap.
~~~
p erl4e ver 
I'd saythe tru th valueof a ny possibl e s tat ement  is _enti rely _  d eri v ed fr om
c o ntext. An y  p oss i b le  statementc o u ldappea r o n  a sig n fr om nowhere in ani nfinite emptyuniv e r sepur e ly o ut  of quantum fl uct ua t i ons, but  i t would hav e
no mea ni n g wit hout t he con text of a  u n iverse  lik e o urs. Ever y s ta t ement h as  a contex t in  w hich i t expr e sses t he truth, and ma ny ot h e rs in whi ch it 
.

"Males are_not females"_may be accurate when_referring to_biological_sex, but
in_the_context it is_most commonly used_(as harassment and as_a
neoconservative tribal signifier)_it_is referring to gender, and is roughly
equivalent to saying "the gender you have now_should_match the_gender_you_were
assigned at birth, or your_gender identity is illegitimate".

It's similar_to saying_"all lives matter". Of course they do, but_the_context
in which its_said indicates that it's an opposition to the explicit_statement
about black lives mattering, a de-focusing_and dismissal. "All_lives_matter"
or_"males are not females"_are not incorrect statements, but in_the vast
majority of the times they_are used on the internet, they are_used to express
hatred of a group_and the active dismissal of_that group's_efforts to achieve
equal human rights._The context in_which they_are used makes_them hateful.
Hiding behind the "but it's_scientific fact!" is_simply a deflection from the
fact that_it_is an expression_of_hate_in the_context in which_it_is used.

I_shouldn't_have to explain this, honestly. Please_stop_acting like a jerk to
people online.

~~~
HeroOfAges
Since when_does the truth need_context?_If I tweet "males_are not females" on
Twitter with_no context, they will ban my_account.

Also, if_I want_to say "the gender you have now should match the gender_you
were assigned at birth, or your_gender identity is illegitimate",_that's
precisely what_I'll_say, but I_tend_to speak_directly. Have you considered you
might be projecting_if you_can read the literal words "males_are not females"
and conclude_a_person intends to say, "the gender_you have now should match
the gender_you were assigned at birth,_or_your_gender identity is
illegitimate"? That seems_like quite a leap.

~~~
perl4ever
I'd say the_truth value of_any possible statement is _entirely_ derived from
context._Any_possible statement could appear on a_sign_from nowhere in an
infinite empty universe_purely_out_of quantum fluctuations, but it_would have
no meaning without the context_of a universe like ours. Every statement has a
context_in which it_expresses the truth, and many_others_in_which it