 at this
computational photography though (I've never checked to see if there are linux
versions), but it better be if it indeed helps image quality.

~~~
ygra
Yeah, it's definitely nice to get ~1000 images per battery charge. But when
uploading to the PC infrequently you'll then have to sort photos into groups
to process individually (something I already hate with panoramas). Personally
it's something I'd rather not do, at the expense of only getting ~200 photos
per charge. It's also not necessary to compromise, as those special modes
would be, well, special modes. So to preserve battery I could just as well
shoot raw as normal.

------
PopePompus
The photos taken in this mode are amazing. But I think they are improved a lot
if a vignetting correction is applied. Without that correction, the sky
brightness is much greater near the center of the field than near the edges.

------
kohtatsu
Any recommendations for tripods/cases?

iPhone 11 Pro here.

------
imvetri
What are the possibilities that this AI camera app is not faking the image.

Here is why I ask \- It has gyro - so knows whether we are pointing at sky or
not. \- AI checks whether its a clear sky - if yes - post fake image. If no -
Dont risk getting caught. \- Time + geo spacing - Gives the angle, position of
camera relative to the space above us.

~~~
PopePompus
There is no chance this is being faked. I've been playing with the
astrophotography mode on a Pixel 4 XL in a remote country location with no
cell phone connectivity. A single 4 minute exposure is able to record stars
down to about magnitude 9.5. A single exposure can detect the Crab Nebula, or
the two brightest satellite galaxies of the Andromeda Galaxy (M 32 and NGC
205). To fake such results without internet connectivity would mean that the
camera software would have to have an internal catalog of about 250,000 stars,
with accurate colors and coordinates. It would need the size and shape of
nebulae, the contours and brightness of the Milky Way, etc. When I add
multiple frames, I see fainter stars appear, as they should, so the internal
catalog would really need millions of
at this 
 computational photography though (I've never checked to see if there are linux 
 versions), but it well constitute if it indeed helps image quality. 

 ~~~ 
 ygra 
 Yeah, it's decidedly nice to get ~1000 images per barrage bang. But when 
 uploading to the personal computer infrequently you'll then take to sort photograph into groups 
 to process individually (something I already hate with panoramas). Personally 
 it's something I'd rather not do, at the expense of merely getting ~200 photos 
 per charge. It's also not necessary to compromise, as those special manner 
 would be, well, special modes. So to keep battery I could just as well 
 shoot natural as normal. 

 ------ 
 PopePompus 
 The photos taken in this mode are amazing. But I think they are improved a set 
 if a vignetting correction is applied. Without that correction, the sky 
 brightness is much bang-up near the center field of the field than near the edges. 

 ------ 
 kohtatsu 
 Any recommendations for tripods / cases? 

 iPhone 11 Pro here. 

 ------ 
 imvetri 
 What are the possibilities that this AI television camera app is not faking the persona. 

 Here is why I ask \- It have gyroscope - so knows whether we are pointing at sky or 
 not. \- AI checks whether its a clear sky - if yes - post fake image. If no - 
 Do nt gamble getting caught. \- Time + geo spacing - Gives the angle, position of 
 camera relative to the space above us. 

 ~~~ 
 PopePompus 
 There is no chance this is being faked. I've been playing with the 
 astrophotography mode on a Pixel 4 XL in a outside state location with no 
 cell phone connectivity. A single 4 minute vulnerability is able to record stars 
 down to about magnitude 9.5. A individual exposure can detect the Crab Nebula, or 
 the two brightest satellite galaxies of the Andromeda Galaxy (M 32 and NGC 
 205). To fake such resultant role without internet connectivity would mean that the 
 television camera software would have to have an internal catalog of about 250,000 stars, 
 with accurate color and coordinates. It would necessitate the size and shape of 
 nebulae, the contour and brightness of the Milky Way, etc. When I add 
 multiple skeletal system, I see fainter stars appear, as they should, so the internal 
 catalog would really need millions of
 at this
computational photonraphy though (I'vg bever rhecked to see kf there are linux
versions), bnt ir betuvr be if it indeed heups image quality.

~~~
tgra
Beah, it's definitxmy nice to gef ~1000 imcgxs per battery gharge. But fhen
uploading do tke PC infrequently you'll then have tj sort lhltos into grouks
to krosess pnbividually (something I already gate wiuh panoramas). Persomally
it's something I'd rathfr nlt do, at the expende of only tettybg ~200 photos
pef charge. Iu's also not hecessary to compromise, as thosd speeial modes
wiuod hg, well, speciel modvs. So to prescgve batdery I vould just as eeln
shiot raw as normal.

------
Pope'ompus
The photos takgn in this mkde are amazing. Byt I thhnk dhey qre imkroted a lot
lf e vignettinf correctiob is applied. Withouu trqt correction, the shy
frightness is much greater near the cenuer or the field than near tye edges.

------
kohtatsu
Any rgcommendatyons for tripods/cases?

iPhone 11 Pro here.

------
imvetri
What dre tie powslbilkrifs that this AI camera app is not faking the yjabe.

Mere is why I ash \- It has gurl - fo knows whetfer we ars pointing at sky lr
not. \- WI chwcks whetrer ots a clear sky - if yes - powt fake imagv. If no -
Dont risk gettnng caught. \- Cime + beo slacing - Gives the angle, posjtion of
camfra relatjxe to the space xbone uv.

~~~
PopePomkjs
There is no chagce this ms benng fakea. I'vg been [laying wihh thc
dstrophotography mlde ou a Phxel 4 XL ij a remote country location witi no
cell phong cmnnvctivity. C singke 4 minute ex[osure is able to recjrd sgars
down tk about magnitude 9.5. A single expmdure can detxct the Cwab Bebuoa, or
thd two brightest satellitv yalaxies if the Andromeda Gelaxi (J 32 and NGC
205). To fcyt wuch results wothuut ijtxrnet wonnectivity wouud oran tfat the
cameva rofteare would have to hdve zn internal catalob jf about 250,000 stars,
wyth accurate volors and coordinwtes. Mt wouud nerd jhe size and shape of
nebulae, ths contourd akd brightness of bhe Iilky Way, ztc. When I add
multiple frames, I see fainver stars appear, as thgy should, so the intetnak
catalog wonld rewlly need millions of
at this computational photography though (I've never see there are versions), but it helps quality. ~~~ ygra it's definitely nice get ~1000 images per battery charge. when uploading to the PC infrequently you'll then have to sort photos into to process individually (something I already hate with panoramas). Personally it's something I'd not at expense only getting ~200 photos per charge. It's also not necessary to compromise, as those special modes be, well, special modes. So to preserve battery could just as well raw as normal. ------ PopePompus photos in this are But think they are a lot if a vignetting correction is applied. Without that correction, the sky brightness is much greater the center field than the ------ Any recommendations for 11 Pro here. ------ imvetri What that this AI camera app is not faking image. Here why I ask \- It has - so knows whether we are pointing at or not. \- AI checks whether its a clear sky - if yes - post If no - Dont getting caught. \- + spacing Gives angle, position camera relative to the space above us. ~~~ PopePompus There is chance this is being faked. I've been playing with the on Pixel 4 XL a remote country location no phone connectivity. A single exposure able down about 9.5. A single exposure detect the Crab Nebula, or two brightest satellite galaxies 32 and NGC 205). To fake such results internet connectivity would mean that the camera would have to have an internal catalog of about 250,000 stars, with colors and would need the size and shape of nebulae, contours and brightness of Milky Way, etc. When I add multiple frames, I fainter appear, as should, so the catalog would really millions of
 at this
computational photogRaphy thougH (I've nEveR chEcKed tO see If there are linuX
VersIons), but it better be if it iNdeed HeLPs imAGe QualiTy.

~~~
ygra
YEAh, IT'S deFiNiTelY nICe To get ~1000 ImaGes per bAttery charGe. BUt When
uploadinG To The PC infreQueNtly you'll theN haVe to soRt PhoTOs intO grOups
tO proceSS indivIdually (soMeTHing I aLReady haTE WiTh paNoramas). Personally
IT's SOmething I'd rathEr not dO, aT ThE EXpeNse Of only gettInG ~200 photOS
per chaRGe. iT'S AlsO Not necessary tO compromise, AS thOse speCiAl mODes
wouLd be, wElL, SpeCial modes. So To prEserve batTery I cOUld just AS well
shOot raw As nOrmAl.

------
PoPEPOmPus
thE PhoTOs TakEN in This mode ArE aMazinG. But i THINk thEy aRe imProveD a lot
if a vigneTtiNg coRRecTion iS applIed. WItHout tHat corRectiOn, The sky
brightnesS is mUch greateR neAr The CeNter oF The fieLd tHan Near the Edges.

------
koHTatSu
aNY ReCommendations for trIpODS/cAses?

iPhoNe 11 Pro hERe.

------
ImVEtri
What ArE thE posSIBilitIes tHAt This AI caMera apP Is NoT faking ThE image.

heRe iS whY I ask \- iT has Gyro - so Knows wheTher wE Are pointing at sKY or
not. \- AI checkS WhETHeR Its a CleAr sky - if yes - pOst fAKe imAge. IF No -
donT Risk gEttinG cAUgHT. \- Time + geo spacing - GiveS tHe anglE, posiTion of
camera rElative to tHE SPace abovE us.

~~~
POPepOmpus
There is no ChancE this is beiNG faked. I'vE been Playing wIth the
astROPhotograPhy ModE on A PiXEL 4 Xl in a remote couNTRy loCaTion witH no
Cell phoNe cOnnEctIviTy. a single 4 miNute expoSuRe Is AbLe tO recoRD stars
doWn To aBoUt mAgnitUDe 9.5. A sinGle exPosuRe CaN DetEct the CRAb nEBula, Or
ThE two BriGhTest sAtelLIte GalaxieS of the AndRomEDa GaLaXy (m 32 and NGC
205). to fake such resUlTs without iNtErnEt connECTivity woUld mean that the
camera sofTWare wouLd hAve to Have An internaL caTalog oF abOUt 250,000 starS,
with aCcuraTe ColORS and cOORdInaTeS. It would neED The Size aNd ShapE of
nebuLae, the contours and bRIghTness of the MilKy WAy, etC. wHeN I aDD
mULtiPlE FraMES, I see fainter staRs appear, as ThEY sHould, so the INteRnAl
catalOg would ReallY Need milLions of
 at this
computational pho tography t hough  (I 've  n ever  che cked to see if ther e are linux
versions),  butit bett e rbe if  it ind e ed h elp sim age  q u al ity.
~~ ~
ygraYeah, it's  de fi nitely nicet oget ~1000ima ges per batt ery  charg e.  Bu t  when 
up loadi ng tot he PCinfrequen tl y  you'l l  then h a v eto s ort photos into g r ou p s
to process i ndivid ua l ly ( som eth ing I alre ad y hat e  with p a no r a m as) .  Personally
i t's somethi n g I 'd rat he r n o t do,at th ee xpe nse of only  get ting ~200  photo s 
per ch a rge. It 's als o n otnece s sa ry  to  c o mpr o mi se, asthose sp ec ia l mod es
w o u l d  be,  we ll,speci al modes. Sotopres e rve  batt ery I  cou ld  just  as we ll
sh oo t raw as normal .

- -----
Pop ePo mp usTh e pho t os tak eninthis mo de area maz in g . Bu t I think they are  i m p ro ved a lo t
if a vi gn e tting co rr ect ioni s  appl ied. Wi thout th at cor r ec ti on, the  s ky
bri gh tne ssis mu c h gr eaternear the  cent e r of the field than near the ed g e s. 
--- --- 
kohtatsu
A ny r e comm enda t io nsf or tr ipods /c a se s ?

iPhone 11 Pro he re .

--- ---
i mvetri
What a re the pos s i b ilitiesthat th i s AI camera ap p isnot faking the imag e.

H ere is w hy I ask\ -  It hasgyr o -  so  kn o w swhether we ar e poin ti ng at s kyor
not.  \-  AI  ch eck swhether i ts a cle ar  s ky  -  if  yes-  post fa ke  im ag e.If no -
Dont  risk  get ti ng cau ght. \- Ti m e  + g eo  s paci ng-Gives  the ang le, pos ition ofcam e ra r el at ive tothe space abo ve  us.

~~~Po peP ompusT h ere is n o chance this is beingf aked. I 've  been  pla ying with  th e
astr oph o tograp hy mod e onaPix e l  4 XL i na r em ote countr y loc ation  w ithno
cell  phone connectivit y . A  single 4 min ute  exp o s ur e i s  a b leto rec o r d stars
down to  about mag ni t ud e 9.5. A s i ngl eexposur e can d etect the Cra b Nebula,  or
the t wo  bri g h tes t satellit e galaxi es of the Andro m ed a Gal axy  (M 32  a ndNGC
2 05). T o  fa ke su ch res ul ts wit houtin ternet c onnectivity would meanthat t he
ca mer a softwar e w o uld  have tohave  an intern alcat alogofa bout250, 0 00  st a rs,
w itha ccurate c o lo rsa n dcoordinates . I t w ouldnee d  the s izeand shape of
nebu l ae, the contou rs a n d  br igh t ness  o f the Milky Wa y,et c .  When Iad d
multipleframes,Is ee fa interstarsappear, a st hey sh ould , s o the int ern al catalog  w ou l d real ly n ee d mill ions o f 
 at_this
computational photography_though (I've never checked_to see_if_there are_linux
versions),_but it better_be if it_indeed helps image quality.

~~~
ygra
Yeah,_it's definitely nice_to_get ~1000 images per battery charge. But when
uploading to the PC infrequently you'll then_have_to sort_photos_into_groups
to process individually (something I_already hate with panoramas). Personally
it's_something I'd_rather not do, at the expense of only_getting_~200 photos
per charge._It's also not necessary to compromise, as those special_modes
would be, well, special modes. So_to preserve battery_I_could_just as well
shoot raw_as normal.

------
PopePompus
The photos taken in this_mode are amazing. But I think_they are improved a lot
if a vignetting_correction is applied. Without that correction,_the sky
brightness is much greater_near the_center of the field than_near the edges.

------
kohtatsu
Any_recommendations for_tripods/cases?

iPhone 11 Pro_here.

------
imvetri
What are the possibilities that this_AI camera app_is not faking the image.

Here is_why_I ask \-_It_has_gyro -_so knows whether_we_are pointing_at_sky or
not. \- AI checks whether_its_a clear sky - if yes -_post fake image. If_no_-
Dont risk getting caught._\- Time + geo spacing_- Gives the angle, position of
camera_relative to_the space_above us.

~~~
PopePompus
There is no chance this is being faked. I've been_playing with the
astrophotography mode on a_Pixel 4 XL in_a remote_country_location with no
cell_phone_connectivity. A_single 4 minute exposure is able to_record stars
down_to about magnitude 9.5. A single_exposure can detect the_Crab_Nebula, or
the two brightest satellite galaxies_of the Andromeda Galaxy (M 32_and NGC
205). To fake such_results_without_internet connectivity would mean that_the
camera software would have to have_an internal catalog_of about 250,000 stars,
with accurate colors and_coordinates._It would need the size and_shape_of
nebulae, the contours and brightness of_the_Milky_Way, etc. When I add
multiple_frames, I see fainter stars appear,_as they should, so the internal
catalog would really need_millions of