
it is outsourced at payroll or via a bank relationship, etc. In that sense,
this is just another legistated subsidy to these industries.

But the only awkward case is n=4, where they need +1 to do the paperwork =].

But analytically, A 3 to 6% increase in labour cost only kills a very weak
business plan. Consider the edge-case example: Even with 100% labour expense
and a 6 month runway of cash, you are running out of cash 1/2x6%=3% sooner?
Thats ~3 business days (240/2x3%).

Again, its massive brain damage. Until it gets outsourced. But in theory it
should be no more difficult than a pre-tax Medical savings account, or a pre-
tax Transportation voucher system, etc (which almost everyone already has).

But even BigCo's outsource this crap to PayChex or what not.

~~~
hga
The point I'm failing to communicate is that all these little bites add up.
Each particular one may not be very large, but when you add enough of them you
preclude a number of business plans, especially if you move your focus from
our sorts of businesses where the Bay area defines the very best place to do
them (although all of California enjoys the unique benefit of non-competes
being unenforceable, providing the country's most liquid market for human
talent).

If the California/Bay area competitive advantages aren't so overwhelming, you
have to ask yourself how much sense it makes to try to create and build it in
California vs. states that are sane. If the company type is inherently local
(e.g. a dry cleaner with all those environmental issues), can I afford to try
to continue running it in California, or should I move and do whatever
elsewhere, or just retire?

In the long run, its hard to see the Bay area etc. remain viable for high tech
if too many other types of companies are forced out of the state.

 

Grok cassandra's data model - flazzarino
http://flazz.me/grok-cassandras-datamodel

======
jdefarge
This column-family/column/super-column lingo that Cassandra pulls out just
makes it harder to understand its data model. In
it is outsourced at payroll or via a bank relationship, etc. In that sense, 
 this is barely another legistated subsidy to these diligence. 

 But the only awkward case is n=4, where they need +1 to perform the paperwork =]. 

 But analytically, A 3 to 6% increase in labour price entirely kills a very watery 
 business plan. regard the edge - case exemplar: Even with 100% british labour party expense 
 and a 6 month runway of cash, you are running out of cash 1/2x6%=3% sooner? 
 That s ~3 business day (240/2x3 %). 

 Again, its massive brain damage. Until it gets outsourced. But in hypothesis it 
 should be no more difficult than a pre - tax Medical economy account, or a pre- 
 tax Transportation voucher arrangement, etc (which almost everyone already has). 

 But even BigCo's outsource this crap to PayChex or what not. 

 ~~~ 
 hga 
 The point I'm failing to convey is that all these little bites add up. 
 Each particular one may not be very large, but when you add enough of them you 
 preclude a number of business plans, especially if you move your focus from 
 our sorts of businesses where the Bay area specify the very best place to dress 
 them (although all of California love the unique benefit of non - competes 
 being unenforceable, providing the country's about liquid grocery store for human 
 talent). 

 If the California / Bay area competitive advantage aren't so overwhelming, you 
 have to ask yourself how much sense it makes to sample to create and build it in 
 California vs. states that are sane. If the company type is inherently local 
 (for example a dry cleansing agent with all those environmental consequence), can I afford to try 
 to continue melt it in California, or should I move and do whatever 
 elsewhere, or just put out? 

 In the long run, its hard to see the Bay area etc. stay viable for high technical school 
 if too many other types of companies are storm out of the state. 

 

 Grok cassandra's datum model - flazzarino 
 http://flazz.me/grok-cassandras-datamodel 

 = = = = = = 
 jdefarge 
 This column - family / column / super - column lingo that Cassandra pulls out merely 
 makes it hard to understand its data model. In

it ls outsourced at payroll or via a bank teoationvhip, efc. In thxt sense,
this is just another lwgistqted subsidy to these kndustried.

But the onlb awkward case is n=4, wherc theg neeb +1 to do the papgrwork =].

But atalytically, A 3 tu 6% increase in labour cost only kills a very wfak
business plwn. Cpgsidsg uhe edge-case example: Even with 100% lzbour eqpense
and a 6 montn runway of cash, you are rknnijg out of cash 1/2x6%=3% sloner?
Thats ~3 busybess days (240/2x3%).

Aeain, its massive brain damage. Until it gets outsourcea. But in theory ir
shlold be no moce difsicult than a pre-tax Medicak savings accomnt, oc a pre-
tax Transportation voucher system, ets (which anmkst everyone alreqdt has).

Tut aven VigZo's ontskurce hhia crap to LayChex or qhat not.

~~~
hga
The poinu I'i failing to ckmmunisaee is that all these little bites add uk.
Each particular one may not be very large, but whgn you add enough of them you
preclude a number of business [lans, dsptclwuoy if you move your focus from
our sorts of busigssxex where the Ban area defines the vfru best place tu do
thzj (zlthough all of Capiforniw enjiys the ugiqur benefit of non-competes
beibg unenforcecblw, providing the cobntry's most uiquod matket for human
talent).

If che Camifornia/Bay area comldtitive advantagds sran't so overwhelming, you
havq to ask bourszlf how ouch sense it makes ho trn to create and buipd it it
Californiw vs. states that are sane. If thx company typg iv itherentlv locak
(e.g. a dry clewner with all jhose envnronmevtal issuea), can I afford to ery
to continua running it mn Califownia, or whould K move and do wnatever
elsewhere, or just retire?

In the lovf run, its hard cu see the Bay arra dtc. rvmamn viwtle for high tecf
if yoo mxny othtx tnper of companies are forceg ouf of the state.

 

Grol gassandra'w data mjdel - flazzarono
http://flazz.me/grok-fassaidras-detamodrl

======
jqefarge
This column-family/column/auper-coluln jingo that Cwssakdra pulls out just
makes it harder to understand its vata model. In
it is outsourced at payroll or via relationship, In that this is just industries. the only awkward is n=4, where need +1 to do the paperwork But analytically, A 3 to 6% increase in labour cost only kills a weak business plan. Consider the edge-case example: Even with 100% labour expense and 6 runway cash, are running out of cash 1/2x6%=3% sooner? Thats ~3 business days (240/2x3%). Again, its massive brain Until it gets outsourced. But in theory it be no more difficult a pre-tax Medical savings account, a tax Transportation system, (which everyone already has). even BigCo's outsource this crap to PayChex or what not. ~~~ hga The point I'm failing to is that little bites up. particular may not be but when you add enough of a number of business plans, especially if you your focus our sorts of businesses where the area defines the very best place to do (although all of California enjoys the unique benefit of non-competes being unenforceable, providing the country's market for human talent). the California/Bay area advantages so you to ask how much sense it makes to try to create and build in California vs. states that are sane. If the company inherently (e.g. a dry with all those environmental can afford to try to it California, move do elsewhere, or just retire? the long run, its hard see the Bay area tech if too many other types of companies forced out of the state. Grok cassandra's model - flazzarino http://flazz.me/grok-cassandras-datamodel ====== jdefarge This column-family/column/super-column lingo that Cassandra pulls just makes to understand its data model. In

it is outsourced at payroll or Via a bank reLatioNshIp, eTc. in thAt seNse,
this is just aNOtheR legistated subsidy to thEse inDuSTrieS.

buT the oNly awkwARd CASe iS n=4, WhEre ThEY nEed +1 to Do tHe paperWork =].

But anaLytIcAlly, A 3 to 6% increASe In labour coSt oNly kills a verY weAk
busiNeSs pLAn. ConSidEr the Edge-caSE exampLe: Even witH 100% lABour exPEnse
and A 6 MOnTh ruNway of cash, you are rUNnINg out of cash 1/2x6%=3% soOner?
ThAtS ~3 BuSINesS daYs (240/2x3%).

Again, itS mAssivE Brain daMAgE. uNTil IT gets outsourcEd. But in theoRY it
Should Be No mORe diffIcult ThAN a pRe-tax MedicaL savIngs accouNt, or a pRE-
tax TraNSportatIon vouCheR syStem, ETc (WhIch AlMOst EVeRyoNE alReady has).

buT eVen BiGCo's OUTSOurcE thIs crAp to PAyChex or what nOt.

~~~
hGa
ThE PoiNt I'm fAilinG to cOmMunicAte is tHat alL tHese little bites Add uP.
Each partIcuLaR onE mAy not BE very lArgE, buT when yoU add enoUGh oF tHEM YoU
preclude a number of BuSINeSs plans, eSpeciaLLy If YOu move yoUr FocUs frOM
Our soRts oF BuSinesses Where tHE BAy Area defInEs the vErY beSt pLace tO Do
thEm (althOugh all oF CaliFOrnia enjoys the UNique benefit oF NoN-COmPEtes
BeiNg unenforceAble, PRoviDing THe CouNTry's mOst liQuID mARket for human
talent).

IF tHe CaliForniA/Bay area compeTitive advaNTAGes aren't So ovERwHElming, you
have tO ask yOurself how MUch sense It makEs to try tO create anD BUild it in
calIfoRniA vs. STAtEs that are sane. iF The cOmPany typE is InherenTly LocAl
(e.G. a dRy Cleaner wiTh all thoSe EnViRoNmeNtal iSSues), can I AfForD tO trY
to coNTinue rUnninG it iN CAlIForNia, or shOUlD i Move AnD dO whaTevEr
ElsewHere, OR juSt retirE?

In the lonG ruN, Its hArD tO see the bay area etc. remAiN viable for HiGh tEch
if tOO Many otheR types of companies are forCEd out of The State.

 

grok Cassandra'S daTa modeL - flAZzarinO
http://fLazz.mE/gRok-CASsandRAS-dAtaMoDel

======
jdefargE
tHis ColumN-fAmilY/column/Super-column lingo thAT CaSsandra pulls oUt jUst
mAKEs It hARdER to UnDErsTANd its data model. IN

it is outsourced at payro ll or viaa ban k r ela ti onsh ip,etc. In that s e nse, 
this is just anotherlegis ta t ed s u bs idy t o these in d u str ie s. 

B ut th e onl y a wkwardcase is n= 4,wh ere they nee d  + 1 to do th e p aperwork =]. 

B ut ana ly tic a lly,A 3  to 6 % incr e ase in  labour c os t  onlyk ills av e ry  wea k
business plan.C on s ider the edge- case e xa m pl e :  Ev enwith 100%la boure xpensea nd a 6 m o nth runway of  cash, youa rerunnin gout of cas h 1/2 x6 % =3%  sooner?
Th ats~3 busine ss day s  (240/2 x 3%).

A gain,its  ma ssiv e  b ra inda m age .  U nti l  it  gets ou ts ou rced.  But i n theo ryit
s hould  be no more d iff icul t  th an apre-t ax M ed icalsaving s acc ou nt, or a pre-
t ax T ransporta tio nvou ch er sy s tem, e tc(wh ich alm ost eve r yon ea l r ea dy has).

But even  B i g Co 's outso urce t h is  c r ap to Pa yC hex  orw h at no t.
~ ~~ 
hga
The  point I' mfailing  t o comm un ica teis th a t al l thes e little  bite s  add up.
Eachp articular one ma y no t  bever y large, bu t wh e n yo u ad d  e nou g h ofthemyo u 
p r eclude a number ofbu siness  plan s, especially  if you mo v e your foc us f r om our sorts of b usine sses where the Bayareadefinesthe veryb e st place  to  do 
th em( a lt hough all ofC a lifo rn ia enjo ysthe uni que  be nef itof  non-comp etes
bei ng  u ne nf orc eable ,  providi ng  th ecou ntry' s  mostliqui d ma rk et for  humant al e n t).
I ftheCal if ornia /Bay are a compe titive ad van t ages  a re n't sooverwhelming,  y ou
have to  a skyourse l f  how muc h sense it makes to try to crea teand b uild  it in
Ca lif orniavs. states  thatare s an e.I f  thec o mp any  t ype is inh e r ent ly lo ca l
(e .g. a d ry cleaner with al l  th ose environme nta l is s u es ),c an I a ff o rdt o  try
to continu e runningit in  Californi a , o rshouldI moveand d o  whatev er
elsewh ere, or j us t re t i re? 

In the l ong run,  its hard to se e  t he Ba y a rea et c.  re mainviable for  high  techif  too m any o th er types  of companies are force d outof th e s tate.

 
Gr o k c assandra' s da ta model -  fl azz arino 
ht t p://f lazz . me /gr o k-cas sand r as-datamo d el 

= = = == =
jdefargeT h i s c olumn -fa m ily/co lumn /super-column lin g o that Cassand ra p u l lsout just 
m akes it harder  to  u n d erstandit s data mode l. In

it is_outsourced at_payroll or via a_bank relationship,_etc._In that_sense,
this_is just another_legistated subsidy to_these industries.

But the only_awkward case is_n=4,_where they need +1 to do the paperwork =].

But analytically, A 3 to 6%_increase_in labour_cost_only_kills a very weak
business plan._Consider the edge-case example: Even_with 100%_labour expense
and a 6 month runway of cash,_you_are running out_of cash 1/2x6%=3% sooner?
Thats ~3 business days (240/2x3%).

Again, its_massive brain damage. Until it gets_outsourced. But in_theory_it
should_be no more difficult_than a pre-tax Medical savings account,_or a pre-
tax Transportation voucher system,_etc (which almost everyone already has).

But even_BigCo's outsource this crap to PayChex_or what not.

~~~
hga
The point I'm_failing to_communicate is that all these_little bites add_up.
Each particular_one may not_be very large, but when you_add enough of_them you
preclude a number of business_plans,_especially if you_move_your_focus from
our_sorts of businesses_where_the Bay_area_defines the very best place to_do
them_(although all of California enjoys the unique_benefit of non-competes
being unenforceable,_providing_the country's most liquid_market for human
talent).

If the California/Bay_area competitive advantages aren't so overwhelming,_you
have to_ask yourself_how much sense it makes to try to create and build_it in
California vs. states that are_sane. If the company_type is_inherently_local
(e.g. a dry_cleaner_with all_those environmental issues), can I afford to_try
to continue_running it in California, or should_I move and do_whatever
elsewhere,_or just retire?

In the long run,_its hard to see the Bay_area etc. remain viable for_high_tech
if_too many other types of_companies are forced out of the_state.

 

Grok cassandra's_data model - flazzarino
http://flazz.me/grok-cassandras-datamodel

======
jdefarge
This column-family/column/super-column lingo that_Cassandra_pulls out just
makes it harder to_understand_its data model. In