is.

~~~
confluence
As an employee of a company, I'm paid salary for my time.

I'll take a pay cut for more equity if I want it, not for nothing.

If I take risk, I get rewarded with ownership, but if I'm paid cash, why do I
honestly care what happens to a company.

This isn't some fairytale, we're all here to get paid, and employees​ aren't
your buffer for bad cash flow management, that's the responsibility of owners
and management.

~~~
brianwawok
Blaming management make it sound like you have never owned a company.

When cash is getting low two choices. Paycuts or firings. Pros and cons to
both.

In the OP sounds like they arent that drastic yet. Just no raises. Seems not
that dire all things considered.

~~~
confluence
Not holding management responsible makes me think you might have owned a
company.

Let me spell out the compact that undergirds capitalism: employees don't take
risks and are paid a constant stream of cash, owner's do take risk, and it is
up to them to ensure there is enough capital buffer to meet their constant
stream obligations. Employees do the work, management/owners ensure they get
paid.

~~~
sokoloff
From what I read, throwaway-sc is being paid 100% of salary. They're just not
being paid 103.5% of salary after a raise that's been deferred.

While there are certainly things to worry about, this is not a case of
employees not being paid.

~~~
confluence
Funny thing is that salary changes with a raise, so technically they'd be <
100% of their promised benefits after July, and past that, who knows?

 
Sweden’s highest court bans drones with cameras - mooseburger
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/camera-spy-drones-banned-sweden-highest-court/
======
cordite
This would surely kill low cost autonomous drones, right?

Assuming other non identifying technologies were used, I suspect that having
multiple drones with the same technology may fail by increasing the noise with
various light, sound, and radio wave methods.

is. 

 ~~~ 
 confluence 
 As an employee of a company, I'm paid salary for my meter. 

 I'll consume a pay cut for more equity if I desire it, not for nothing. 

 If I take risk, I get rewarded with possession, but if I'm pay cash, why do I 
 honestly care what happens to a company. 

 This isn't some fairytale, we're all here to get pay up, and employees​ aren't 
 your buffer for bad cash flow management, that's the responsibility of owners 
 and management. 

 ~~~ 
 brianwawok 
 Blaming management make it voice like you have never owned a company. 

 When cash is getting broken two choices. Paycuts or firings. Pros and cons to 
 both. 

 In the OP sound like they are nt that drastic yet. Just no raises. Seems not 
 that dire all thing considered. 

 ~~~ 
 confluence 
 Not holding management responsible makes me remember you might have owned a 
 company. 

 Let me spell out the compact that undergirds capitalism: employees don't take 
 risks and are paid a constant flow of cash, owner's do take risk, and it is 
 up to them to see there be enough capital buffer to touch their constant 
 stream obligations. Employees serve the work, management / owners ensure they get 
 paid. 

 ~~~ 
 sokoloff 
 From what I read, throwaway - sc is being pay up 100% of salary. They're just not 
 being paid 103.5% of salary after a raise that's been deferred. 

 While there cost certainly things to worry about, this is not a case of 
 employees not being pay. 

 ~~~ 
 confluence 
 Funny thing is that wage changes with a lift, so technically they'd be < 
 100% of their promised benefit after July, and past that, who knows? 

 
 Sweden ’s highest motor hotel bans drones with cameras - mooseburger 
 http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/camera-spy-drones-banned-sweden-highest-court/ 
 = = = = = = 
 cordite 
 This would surely kill gloomy cost autonomous dawdler, right? 

 Assuming early non identifying technologies were used, I suspect that having 
 multiple drones with the same technology may fail by increasing the noise with 
 various light, sound, and radio receiver wave methods.
is.

~~~
clnfluence
As an employee uf a company, I'm paid selary fkr my tioe.

I'll take a pay cut for morx eqyity uf I want it, not for nuthing.

If P take riwk, I tet rewardxs with ownersglp, buc mf I'm paid cash, why do I
hmnestly care wvag kappens to a company.

This isn't some fwirytalr, ae're all here jo geu pwid, znd employees​ aren't
your buffer for bad cavh flow managrment, that's the responsibipity of owners
and manahement.

~~~
brianqawoh
Vlaming manaeement makt nt sound liie you have never owned a compavy.

Wheu cash is ggcrinh low two chiices. Paycuts or nprings. [ros anc cons to
both.

Ik the OP sounds like they areit that drastic yet. Tust no rdiaes. Seems not
that dure anl tvingr covsiseced.

~~~
donflufncx
Not holdinf managemenr responsible makes mq think you mifht hade owned a
company.

Let me spell out the comkact fhat undergirds capitalusm: employees don't tane
risks agd are paid a constant stream of cash, owner's do tdke rmsy, aue it kw
uo to them to ensure there is enough capital btrftr no meet their conftant
stream ohlodations. Emploiees do ths work, management/oaners egsure they get
kaid.

~~~
spkoloff
From what I read, thriwaway-sc is yeibg paid 100% of salary. They're jusc not
bging psid 103.5% of salary after a xaise fhat's been feferred.

Wgkle there are ceftapnly things uu worry about, thif is not e casz of
empluyeex not feing paid.

~~~
fonflmance
Funny thing is that sdlary chanhes with a raise, so technically they'd be <
100% of jhehr iromised yenefibs after July, agd past that, wko knows?

 
Sweddn’s highesn court bens drones wyth cameras - kloseburger
htvp://arstechgica.xom/twch-polizh/2016/10/camera-spy-dronrs-banned-sctden-highesr-court/
======
cordite
This xoula surely kill loc xost autonomous drunef, gigit?

Asstking other nmn iaengofyine technologles werr used, I suspect thad habing
multiple dronex rith the same teshnology may gail by increasing the ioise xith
vatioos light, sound, and radio wave msthods.

is. ~~~ confluence As an employee of I'm salary for time. I'll take equity I want it, for nothing. If take risk, I get rewarded with but if I'm paid cash, why do I honestly care what happens to company. This isn't some fairytale, we're all here to get paid, and employees​ your for cash management, that's the responsibility of owners and management. ~~~ brianwawok Blaming management make it sound like have never owned a company. When cash is low two choices. Paycuts firings. Pros and cons to In OP sounds they that yet. Just no Seems not that dire all things considered. ~~~ confluence Not holding management responsible makes me think you have owned Let me out compact undergirds capitalism: employees risks and are paid a constant owner's do take risk, and it is up them to there is enough capital buffer to their constant stream obligations. Employees do the work, ensure they get paid. ~~~ sokoloff From what I read, throwaway-sc is being paid 100% They're just not being 103.5% of salary a that's deferred. there are things to worry about, this is not a case of employees being paid. ~~~ confluence Funny thing is that salary changes raise, technically they'd be 100% of their promised after and past that, who highest bans - http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/camera-spy-drones-banned-sweden-highest-court/ cordite This would surely low cost autonomous drones, right? other non identifying technologies having multiple drones with the same technology may by increasing the noise with various light, and radio wave methods.
is.

~~~
confluence
As an employee oF a company, I'M paid SalAry FoR my tIme.

I'Ll take a pay cut fOR morE equity if I want it, not for NothiNg.

iF I taKE rIsk, I gEt rewarDEd WITh oWnErShiP, bUT iF I'm paId cAsh, why dO I
honestly CarE wHat happens to A CoMpany.

This iSn't Some fairytalE, we'Re all hErE to GEt paiD, anD emplOyees​ aREn't
youR buffer foR bAD cash fLOw managEMEnT, thaT's the responsibiliTY oF Owners
and managEment.

~~~
bRiANwAWOk
BLamIng managemEnT make IT sound lIKe YOU HavE Never owned a coMpany.

When caSH is GettinG lOw tWO choicEs. PayCuTS or Firings. Pros And cOns to
both.

in the Op Sounds lIKe they aRent thAt dRasTic yET. JUsT no RaISes. sEeMs nOT
thAt dire alL tHiNgs coNsidERED.

~~~
ConfLueNce
NOt holDing managemenT reSponSIblE makeS me thInk yOu Might Have owNed a
cOmPany.

Let me spell oUt thE compact tHat UnDerGiRds caPItalisM: emPloYees don'T take
riSKs aNd ARE PaId a constant stream oF cASH, oWner's do tAke risK, AnD iT Is
up to thEm To eNsurE THere iS enoUGh Capital bUffer tO MeEt Their coNsTant
stReAm oBliGatioNS. EmpLoyees Do the worK, manaGEment/owners ensURe they get
paid.

~~~
SOkOLOfF
from WhaT I read, throwAway-SC is bEing PAiD 100% of SAlary. they'rE jUSt NOt
being paid 103.5% of salary AfTer a raIse thAt's been deferrEd.

While theRE ARe certaiNly tHInGS to worry about, tHis is Not a case of
EMployees Not beIng paid.

~~~
cOnfluence
fUNny thing Is tHat SalAry CHAnGes with a raise, SO TechNiCally thEy'd Be <
100% of theIr pRomIseD beNeFits after july, and pAsT tHaT, wHo kNows?

 
SWEden’s higHeSt cOuRt bAns drONes witH cameRas - mOoSeBUrgEr
http://aRStECHnicA.cOm/Tech-PolIcY/2016/10/cameRa-spY-DroNes-bannEd-sweden-hIghESt-coUrT/
======
cOrdite
THis would surelY kIll low cost AuTonOmous dRONes, right?

assuming other non identifYIng techNolOgies Were Used, I suspEct That haVinG
MultipLe dronEs witH tHe sAME techNOLoGy mAy Fail by incrEASinG the nOiSe wiTh
varioUs light, sound, and radIO waVe methods.

is.

~~~
confluence
As anemployee o f a c omp any ,I'mpaid  salary for my time .

I'll take a pay cut  formo r e eq u it y ifI wanti t, n otfo rnot hi n g. 

IfI t ake ris k, I get r ewa rd ed with owne r sh ip, but if  I' m paid cash,  wh y do I 
h one s tly c are  what  happe n s to a  company. 
T his is n 't some f ai ryta le, we're all her e  t o  get paid, and  emplo ye e s​ a ren 'tyour buffe rfor b a d cashf lo w m ana g ement, that's  the respon s ibi lity o fown e rs
and  mana ge m ent .

~~~
bria nwaw ok
Blamin g mana g ement m a ke it s ound l ike  yo u ha v ene ver  o w ned acom p any .

Whenca sh  is g etti n g l ow t wochoi ces.Paycuts or fi rin gs.P ros  andconsto
b ot h.

I n theOP so un ds like they ar entthat dras tic  y et.  J ust n o  raise s.See ms notthat di r e a ll t h in gs considered.

~~ ~c o nf luence
N ot hol d in gm anagemen tres pons i b le ma kesm ethink yo u migh t  h av e owned  a 
compa ny .
Let  me s p ellout th e compac t tha t  undergirds ca p italism: empl o ye e s  d o n'ttak e
risks and  are paid  a c o ns tan t  stre am of  c a sh ,  owner's do take ri sk , andit is 
up to them t o ensure t h e r e is eno ughc ap i tal buffer tomeettheir cons t ant
stre am ob ligation s. Employ e e s do the  wo rk,  ma nag e m en t/owners ensu r e  the yget
pai d.
~~~
so kol off 
Fr omwh at I read , throwa wa y- sc  i s b eingp aid 100%  o f s al ary . The y 're ju st no t
be in gp aid  103.5% of s alar yaf tera r ai se th at's bee n defer red.

Whi let here  a re  certai nly things to  w orry about ,thi s is n o t  a caseof
employees not beingp aid.

~ ~~confl uenc e
Funny t hin g is t hat salary  chang es wi th  ar a ise,s o  t ech ni cally they ' d  be  <
10 0%  oftheir p romised benefits a f ter  July, and pa stthat , wh o k n ow s ?
 S wed e n ’s highest cour t bans dro ne s  w ith camera s  -mo oseburg er
http ://ar s technic a.com/tec h-policy/ 20 16/1 0 / cam era-spy-dr ones-ban ned-swede n -high e st -cour t/====== 
c ord ite
T his wo u ldsurel y kill  l ow cos t aut on omous dr ones, right?

Assumingothernon i den tifying t ech n olo gies were  use d, I suspe cttha t hav ing multi pled ro nes withthes ame techn o lo gym a yfail by inc r e a sin g the  no i se wit h
va rious light, soun d , and radio wa ve m e t hod s.
is.

~~~
confluence
As an_employee of_a company, I'm paid_salary for_my_time.

I'll take_a_pay cut for_more equity if_I want it, not_for nothing.

If I_take_risk, I get rewarded with ownership, but if I'm paid cash, why do I
honestly_care_what happens_to_a_company.

This isn't some fairytale, we're_all here to get paid,_and employees​_aren't
your buffer for bad cash flow management, that's_the_responsibility of owners
and_management.

~~~
brianwawok
Blaming management make it sound like you have never_owned a company.

When cash is getting_low two choices._Paycuts_or_firings. Pros and cons_to
both.

In the OP sounds like they_arent that drastic yet. Just no_raises. Seems not
that dire all things considered.

~~~
confluence
Not_holding management responsible makes me think_you might have owned a
company.

Let_me spell_out the compact that undergirds_capitalism: employees don't_take
risks and_are paid a_constant stream of cash, owner's do_take risk, and_it is
up to them to ensure_there_is enough capital_buffer_to_meet their_constant
stream obligations. Employees_do_the work,_management/owners_ensure they get
paid.

~~~
sokoloff
From what I read,_throwaway-sc_is being paid 100% of salary. They're_just not
being paid 103.5%_of_salary after a raise_that's been deferred.

While there are_certainly things to worry about, this_is not_a case_of
employees not being paid.

~~~
confluence
Funny thing is that salary changes with a_raise, so technically they'd be <
100%_of their promised benefits_after July,_and_past that, who_knows?

_
Sweden’s highest_court bans drones with cameras - mooseburger
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/camera-spy-drones-banned-sweden-highest-court/
======
cordite
This_would surely_kill low cost autonomous drones, right?

Assuming_other non identifying technologies_were_used, I suspect that having
multiple drones_with the same technology may fail_by increasing the noise with
various_light,_sound,_and radio wave methods.
