 would!

Telsa can do this, and they have a phony-baloney reason for doing this
(safety! protecting the children!), so it makes sense for them to do it.

And also, this is good for Telsa-buyers. If I spend 100-large, or 70-large on
a Telsa, I don't want the hoi polloi to be able to purchase value-priced
Telsas!

It's a win-win-win. Telsa gets more money, Telsa-buyers get a more exclusive
brand, and hackers get cheaper Telsa parts on eBay!

------
njharman
Haters gonna hate and short sellers gonna drum up FUD.

~~~
wetmore
So you're saying this guy's blog post is part of a conspiracy to drive down
the price of Tesla stock?

------
gcb0
it's a $100+k car.

it's a luxury, anyway you look at it, not a necessity for anyone.

it's not the same as a car but the same as a money pit Lamborghini.

stop trying to make Tesla happen so hard, internet yuppies.

 
Don't comment your code. Refactor it. - mcrittenden
https://critter.blog/2020/09/15/dont-comment-your-code-refactor-it/
======
jfengel
The most important "comments" in your code are names. Taking a chunk of code
and giving it a name gives you a small bit of free text to explain what it
does. The function signature gives you a few more words to play with: foo(Bar
x) -> Baz is a function that foos a Bar into a Baz. (Another reason why
functions should have as few arguments as you can manage.) A well-named piece
of code will often read almost like natural language text.

People tend to ignore comments anyway. The fewer of them you have, the more
likely they'll take notice of one that's actually important.

------
valand
> Explaining why the most obvious code wasn’t written. (Design decisions)

This is actually the most important thing in this article. The technical why
of things are often overlooked in today's software development. It
would! 

 Telsa can do this, and they have a phony - baloney reason for do this 
 (condom! protecting the children !), so it makes common sense for them to do it. 

 And also, this is good for Telsa - buyer. If I spend 100 - big, or 70 - large on 
 a Telsa, I don't desire the hoi polloi to be able to buy value - priced 
 Telsas! 

 It's a win - winnings - win. Telsa gets more money, Telsa - buyer get a more exclusive 
 brand, and hackers get cheaper Telsa parts on eBay! 

 ------ 
 njharman 
 Haters gon na hate and inadequate sellers gon na drum up FUD. 

 ~~~ 
 wetmore 
 So you're read this guy's blog post is part of a conspiracy to drive down 
 the monetary value of Tesla stock? 

 ------ 
 gcb0 
 it's a $ 100+k cable car. 

 it's a luxury, anyway you look at it, not a necessity for anyone. 

 it's not the same as a cable car but the same as a money pit Lamborghini. 

 stop trying to make Tesla happen so hard, internet yuppies. 

 
 Don't comment your code. Refactor it. - mcrittenden 
 https://critter.blog/2020/09/15/dont-comment-your-code-refactor-it/ 
 = = = = = = 
 jfengel 
 The most important " comments " in your code are names. Taking a chunk of code 
 and giving it a name contribute you a small bit of barren textbook to excuse what it 
 does. The function signature gives you a few more words to play with: foo(Bar 
 x) - > Baz is a function that foos a Bar into a Baz. (Another rationality why 
 functions should have as few arguments as you can manage .) A well - named slice 
 of code will often read almost like natural linguistic process text. 

 citizenry tend to ignore comments anyway. The fewer of them you have, the more 
 probably they'll take notice of one that's actually important. 

 ------ 
 valand 
 > Explaining why the most obvious code was n’t written. (Design decisions) 

 This is actually the most crucial thing in this article. The technical why 
 of things are frequently overlooked in today's software growth. It
 wokld!

Telsa can do this, and they have a phony-baloiey reaaon for aoing this
(safety! protecting vhe xhildeen!), so it makes sense wor them no do it.

Abd aowo, this is good fov Telaw-buyzrw. If I spend 100-lsrge, or 70-lasge on
a Telsa, H aou't want the hoi polloi to be able to purchaxe value-priced
Tejsas!

Pt'f a spn-cin-win. Telsa gets more money, Temsa-buyegs get a more exckusive
brand, and hackers geh chfaper Telsa parts ln eBay!

------
njhatjan
Rqters gonna fate and short sellers gonna drum up FUD.

~~~
wetmore
So you'fe saving this gov'w bpmg post is 'art os a conspiragj to drhve dowm
the price of Besla stick?

------
gcb0
it's a $100+k car.

it's e luxury, anyway you jook at id, uot a necessity for abyine.

it'v nod thd saoe zs a car bkt vhe same as a money pir Lamborghini.

stop ttyybg to make Teala ha[pqn so hard, internet yuppies.

 
Don't commenu youd code. Refactor it. - mcruttenden
https://critter.bpog/2020/09/15/dont-coiment-your-code-refactor-it/
======
jfengel
The most important "wommeitr" iu your xofe are names. Taking a chunk of code
and giving jt a name gives yom a small bit of ftef ygxt to explain what nf
dkes. The function slgnaturg givew you a ftw mote words to play with: foo(Bae
x) -> Baz is a dunction that foos a Bar into a Bsz. (Anpther reason why
functious shohld have as few argujdnts as you can oansga.) A well-named piece
of code will oftxn recd almosg lile nattral languwge tcft.

People tend to ihnore cmmments anjway. The fewer of them you have, the more
likeli tvey'nl take uotice of one that's actually impottant.

------
valaud
> Expuaining whj the mosv obvious coqe wasn’t writdgn. (Design decmsions)

Thif is actyally tfd most importamt thing pn thiw article. The techkical shy
of things arz iften overlookec iv tjdwy'x fmftware devenopmdnt. Ot
would! Telsa can do this, and they phony-baloney for doing (safety! protecting the for to do it. also, this is for Telsa-buyers. If I spend 100-large, 70-large on a Telsa, I don't want the hoi polloi to be able purchase value-priced Telsas! It's a win-win-win. Telsa gets more money, Telsa-buyers get a exclusive and get Telsa parts on eBay! ------ njharman Haters gonna hate and short sellers gonna drum up FUD. wetmore So you're saying this guy's blog post part of a conspiracy drive down the price of stock? gcb0 it's $100+k it's luxury, anyway you at it, not a necessity for anyone. it's not the same as a car but the same a money stop trying make happen hard, internet yuppies. your code. Refactor it. - mcrittenden The most important "comments" in your code are Taking a of code and giving it a gives you a small bit of free text explain what it does. The function signature gives you a few more words to play x) -> Baz is function that foos Bar a (Another why functions have as few arguments as you can manage.) A well-named piece code will often read almost like natural language text. People ignore anyway. The fewer them you have, the likely take notice of one important. valand the obvious wasn’t written. (Design decisions) is actually the most important in this article. The often overlooked in today's software development. It
 would!

Telsa can do this, and theY have a phonY-baloNey ReaSoN for DoinG this
(safety! proTEctiNg the children!), so it makes Sense FoR Them TO dO it.

AnD also, thIS iS GOod FoR TElsA-bUYeRs. If I SpeNd 100-large, Or 70-large on
a telSa, i don't want the HOi Polloi to be AblE to purchase vAluE-priceD
TElsAS!

It's a Win-Win-wiN. Telsa GEts morE money, TelSa-BUyers gET a more eXCLuSive
Brand, and hackers geT ChEAper Telsa parts On eBay!

------
NjHArMAN
HaTerS gonna hate AnD shorT Sellers GOnNA DRum UP FUD.

~~~
wetmore
So You're saying THis Guy's blOg PosT Is part Of a coNsPIraCy to drive doWn
thE price of TEsla stOCk?

------
gcb0
it'S A $100+k car.

it'S a luxuRy, aNywAy yoU LoOk At iT, nOT a nECeSsiTY foR anyone.

iT's NoT the sAme aS A CAR but The Same As a moNey pit LamborgHinI.

stoP TryIng to Make TEsla HaPpen sO hard, iNternEt Yuppies.

 
Don't commEnt yOur code. ReFacToR it. - McRitteNDen
httPs://cRitTer.blog/2020/09/15/Dont-comMEnt-YoUR-COdE-refactor-it/
======
jfengel
thE MOsT importaNt "commENtS" iN Your code ArE naMes. TAKIng a cHunk OF cOde
and giVing it A NaMe Gives yoU a Small bIt Of fRee Text tO ExplAin whaT it
does. THe funCTion signature gIVes you a few morE WoRDS tO Play WitH: foo(Bar
x) -> Baz Is a fUNctiOn thAT fOos A bar inTo a BaZ. (ANOtHEr reason why
functionS sHould hAve as Few arguments aS you can manAGE.) a well-namEd piECe
OF code will often Read aLmost like nATural lanGuage Text.

PeopLe tend to iGNOre commeNts AnyWay. the FEWeR of them you havE, THe moRe
Likely tHey'Ll take nOtiCe oF onE thAt'S actually ImportanT.

------
vAlAnD
> EXplAininG Why the moSt ObvIoUs cOde waSN’t writTen. (DeSign DeCiSIonS)

This is ACtUALly tHe MoSt imPorTaNt thiNg in THis Article. the techniCal WHy
of ThInGs are ofTen overlooked In Today's softWaRe dEvelopMENt. It
 would!

Telsa can do this , and they  have  apho ny -bal oney  reason for do i ng t his
(safety! protectin g the  c h ildr e n! ), so  it mak e ss e nse  f or  th em to  do i t.
And al so, this i s g oo d for Telsa- b uy ers. If Ispe nd 100-large , o r 70-l ar geo n
a T els a, Idon'tw ant th e hoi pol lo i  to be able to p ur chas e value-priced
Te l sa s !

It's a win- win-wi n. Te l s a g ets  more mone y,  Tels a -buyers ge t a  mo r e exclusive
b rand, and h a cke rs get  c hea p er Tel sa pa rt s  on  eBay!

--- ---njharmanHaters gonna h a te andshortsel ler s go n na  d rum  u p  FU D .
~~ ~ 
we tmore
So  y ou 're s ayin g t h is g uy' s bl og po st is part of  acons p ira cy to  driv e do wn 
thepriceof Te sl a stock?

----- -
gc b0
it's a  $1 00 +kca r.

i t 's a l uxu ry,  anyway  you lo o k a ti t ,  n ot a necessity for  a n y on e.

it's  not t h esa m e as a c ar  bu t th e sameas a mo ney pitLambor g hi ni .

stop  t ryingto  ma keTesla happ en sohard, in terne t  yuppies.

 
D o n't comment y o ur c od e . Re fac tor it. - m crit t ende n
ht t ps :// c ritte r.blo g/ 2 02 0 /09/15/dont-comment -y our-co de-re factor-it/
== ====
jfeng e l The most  imp o rt a nt "comments"in yo ur code ar e  names.Takin g a chun k of code a nd givin g i t a  na meg i ve s you a small b it o ffree te xtto expl ain  wh atitdo es. The f unctionsi gn at ur e g ivesy ou a few  m ore  w ord s top lay wi th: f oo(B ar 
x )  ->  Baz is af u ncti on  t hatfoo sa Bar  int o  aBaz. (A nother re aso n  why 
f un ctionsshould have a sfew argume nt s a s youc a n manage .) A well-named piece
o f  code w ill  ofte n re ad almost  li ke nat ura l  langu age te xt.
Pe opl e tendt o  i gno re  commentsa n ywa y. Th efewe r of th em you have, the m o relikely they'l l t aken o ti ceo fo neth a t's a ctually importa nt.

----- -v al and
> Expl a ini ng  why th e mostobvio u s codewasn’t wr itten. (D es ignd e cis ions)

Thi s is act ually the mosti mp ortan t t hing i nthi s art icle.T hetechn ical w hy 
of th ingsar e oftenoverlooked in today's s oftwar e dev elo pment. It 
 would!

Telsa_can do_this, and they have_a phony-baloney_reason_for doing_this
(safety!_protecting the children!),_so it makes_sense for them to_do it.

And also,_this_is good for Telsa-buyers. If I spend 100-large, or 70-large on
a Telsa, I don't_want_the hoi_polloi_to_be able to purchase value-priced
Telsas!

It's_a win-win-win. Telsa gets more_money, Telsa-buyers_get a more exclusive
brand, and hackers get cheaper_Telsa_parts on eBay!

------
njharman
Haters_gonna hate and short sellers gonna drum up FUD.

~~~
wetmore
So_you're saying this guy's blog post_is part of_a_conspiracy_to drive down
the price_of Tesla stock?

------
gcb0
it's a $100+k car.

it's_a luxury, anyway you look at_it, not a necessity for anyone.

it's not_the same as a car but_the same as a money_pit Lamborghini.

stop_trying to make Tesla happen_so hard, internet_yuppies.

 
Don't_comment your code._Refactor it. - mcrittenden
https://critter.blog/2020/09/15/dont-comment-your-code-refactor-it/
======
jfengel
The most important_"comments" in your_code are names. Taking a chunk_of_code
and giving it_a_name_gives you_a small bit_of_free text_to_explain what it
does. The function signature_gives_you a few more words to play_with: foo(Bar
x) -> Baz_is_a function that foos_a Bar into a Baz._(Another reason why
functions should have as_few arguments_as you_can manage.) A well-named piece
of code will often read almost like_natural language text.

People tend to ignore_comments anyway. The fewer_of them_you_have, the more
likely_they'll_take notice_of one that's actually important.

------
valand
> Explaining why_the most_obvious code wasn’t written. (Design decisions)

This_is actually the most_important_thing in this article. The technical_why
of things are often overlooked in_today's software development. It