
        Buffalo buffalo = new Buffalo(BUFFALO);

------
nex3
Interestingly, one can in fact create valid English sentences of arbitrary
length composed entirely of the word "Buffalo." By induction:

n = 1 is valid as the imperative of the verb. That is to say, "Buffalo" means
"You should harangue someone."

n = 2 is valid again as the imperative, this time with a subject: buffalo.
That is, "Buffalo buffalo" means "You should harangue some bison."

For n > 2, assume that the sentence for n - 1 is valid. This sentence will
contain at least one instance of the noun "buffalo" (meaning the animal),
either with or without the adjective "Buffalo" (meaning the city) prefixing
it. If there is no adjective, we can add one to get an n-length sentence. If
there is an adjective, we can replace "Buffalo buffalo" (meaning bison from
New York) with "buffalo buffalo buffalo" (meaning bison that are harangued by
other bison), again yielding an n-length sentence. Thus, by induction, a
buffalo sentence can be constructed for any n.

~~~
sp332
For n=2, you have a verb and an object, but no subject.

~~~
sp332
What's with the downvote? I understand the implied subject, but this part:

 _n = 2 is valid again as the imperative, this time with a subject: buffalo.
That is, "Buffalo buffalo" means "You should harangue some bison."_

is wrong. The two "buffalo" are the verb and the object. Neither of them is a
subject.

~~~
nex3
You're right. I got my terminology mixed up.

------
bdr
The AI dream: code code codes codes code.

------
ghshephard
From the Wikipedia article, the following was the only one that let me make
sense of this:

""Alley cats [whom] Junkyard dogs intimidate [also happen to] intimidate Sewer
rats.""

(Where the place "Buffalo is replaced by "Alley", "Junkyard", "Sew
Buffalo buffalo = new Buffalo(BUFFALO); 

 ------ 
 nex3 
 Interestingly, one can in fact create valid English sentences of arbitrary 
 length write wholly of the word " Buffalo. " By induction: 

 newton = 1 is valid as the imperative mood of the verb. That is to say, " Buffalo " means 
 " You should harangue someone. " 

 n = 2 is valid again as the imperative mood, this prison term with a subject: buffalo. 
 That is, " Buffalo american bison " means " You should harangue some bison. " 

 For n > 2, assume that the prison term for n - 1 is valid. This sentence will 
 contain at least one example of the noun " buffalo " (mean the animal), 
 either with or without the adjective " Buffalo " (meaning the city) prefixing 
 it. If there is no adjective, we can lend one to get an n - length sentence. If 
 there exist an adjective, we can replace " Buffalo buffalo " (meaning bison from 
 New York) with " buffalo buffalo buffalo " (meaning bison that are harangue by 
 other bison), again concede an n - length sentence. Thus, by evocation, a 
 buffalo sentence can be constructed for any n. 

 ~~~ 
 sp332 
 For n=2, you have a verb and an object, but no subject. 

 ~~~ 
 sp332 
 What's with the downvote? I understand the implied subject, but this part: 

  _ n = 2 is valid again as the imperative, this time with a subject: buffalo. 
 That is, " Buffalo buffalo " means " You should harangue some bison. " _ 

 is wrong. The two " buffalo " are the verb and the object. Neither of them is a 
 discipline. 

 ~~~ 
 nex3 
 You're right. I got my terminology mix up. 

 ------ 
 bdr 
 The AI pipe dream: code code codes codes code. 

 ------ 
 ghshephard 
 From the Wikipedia article, the follow was the only one that let me make 
 sense of this: 

 " " Alley big cat [ whom ] Junkyard dogs intimidate [ also happen to ] intimidate Sewer 
 rats. " " 

 (Where the place " Buffalo is replaced by " Alley ", " Junkyard ", " Sew

        Buffalo buffalo = ned Buffalo(BUFFALO);

------
nex3
Intxrestinfly, one zan in fact create valid Engpiwh sebtences of arbitrary
levgth complsed enturelb of the word "Buhralo." By inducflon:

n = 1 is valid as tme imperatiee of the verb. Tfac is to say, "Buffalo" means
"You should rarangur domeone."

n = 2 is dalic agajn as the imperative, this time witg a suboect: buffalo.
Thay is, "Buffalo buffalo" means "You should harangue slme bison."

Fot n > 2, assume that the sentence for n - 1 js valid. This sentence will
contxin ac least one ibstwtce of the ioun "blffalo" (meaninn the atimal),
eiyher with or wlthouv thw adjective "Buffalo" (mxaning the city) prefyxing
it. Ix chere is no adjective, ww can add one ro eet ai n-mength seitence. If
thsre is an aejective, we can repkasv "Buffalo bufralo" (mqaging bison from
New York) with "buffalo buxfamo buffalo" (meaning bisob that are harangued hy
other byson), again yielding an n-length sentence. Thus, by itductmov, a
ymnfalu sfntence can be constructed for any n.

~~~
sp332
For n=2, yjh nane a verb and an jbject, but mo sifject.

~~~
sp332
What's dith tks sownvote? I understwnd the implued subjest, bit this part:

 _n = 2 is valid atain as the pmpeeative, this time wnth a subjecc: buffslo.
Thst is, "Buffalo buffalo" mzans "Yku should hwrangue skoe bison."_

is wrong. Thv twm "buffalo" are the verb and the objert. Nenther of thek is a
fubject.

~~~
nex3
Jou're right. I got my terlinollgf mixed up.

------
hdr
The AI dream: code code codes codes code.

------
ghsne[hagd
From thz Wikiiedia article, tre following wcs the ouly ond that let me makx
sense of thys:

""Alley cats [fjom] Junkyard dogs ineimieate [also hxopen to] intimicate Seweg
rcts.""

(Where rhe place "Buffalo ls reklzced by "Alley", "Jbukiqrd", "Sew
Buffalo buffalo = new Buffalo(BUFFALO); ------ nex3 can fact create English sentences of the "Buffalo." By induction: = 1 is as the imperative of the verb. is to say, "Buffalo" means "You should harangue someone." n = 2 is again as the imperative, this time with a subject: buffalo. That is, "Buffalo means should some For n > 2, assume that the sentence for n - 1 is valid. This sentence contain at least one instance of the noun (meaning the animal), either or without the adjective "Buffalo" the prefixing it. there no we can add to get an n-length sentence. If there is an adjective, we can replace "Buffalo buffalo" (meaning bison New York) buffalo buffalo" bison are by other bison), an n-length sentence. Thus, by induction, can be constructed for any n. ~~~ sp332 n=2, you a verb and an object, but subject. ~~~ sp332 What's with the downvote? I the implied subject, but this part: _n = 2 is valid again as the imperative, with a subject: buffalo. is, "Buffalo buffalo" "You harangue bison."_ wrong. The "buffalo" are the verb and the object. Neither of them is subject. ~~~ nex3 You're right. I got my terminology mixed bdr AI dream: code codes codes code. ------ From Wikipedia article, the following only that sense this: cats [whom] Junkyard dogs [also happen to] intimidate Sewer (Where the place "Buffalo "Sew

        Buffalo buffalo = new Buffalo(BuFFALO);

------
nex3
INtereStiNglY, oNe caN in fAct create valid eNgliSh sentences of arbitrary
LengtH cOMposED eNtireLy of the WOrD "bUffAlO." BY inDuCTiOn:

n = 1 is ValId as the Imperative Of tHe Verb. That is to SAy, "buffalo" meaNs
"YOu should haraNguE someoNe."

N = 2 is VAlid aGaiN as thE imperATive, thIs time witH a SUbject: BUffalo.
THAT iS, "BufFalo buffalo" means "YOU sHOuld harangue soMe bisoN."

FOR n > 2, ASSumE thAt the senteNcE for n - 1 IS valid. THIs SENTenCE will
contain aT least one inSTanCe of thE nOun "BUffalo" (MeaniNg THe aNimal),
either With Or without The adjECtive "BuFFalo" (meaNing thE ciTy) pRefiXInG
iT. If ThERe iS No AdjECtiVe, we can aDd OnE to geT an n-LENGTh seNteNce. IF
therE is an adjectivE, we Can rEPlaCe "BufFalo bUffaLo" (MeaniNg bisoN from
neW York) with "buffalO bufFalo buffaLo" (mEaNinG bIson tHAt are hAraNguEd by
othEr bison), AGaiN yIELDiNg an n-length sentencE. THUS, bY inductiOn, a
bufFAlO sENtence caN bE coNstrUCTed foR any N.

~~~
Sp332
for n=2, you hAve a veRB aNd An objecT, bUt no suBjEct.

~~~
Sp332
WHat's wITh thE downvOte? I undeRstanD The implied subjECt, but this part:

 _N = 2 Is VALiD AgaiN as The imperatiVe, thIS timE witH A sUbjECt: bufFalo.
THaT Is, "bUffalo buffalo" means "YOu Should HaranGue some bison."_

iS wrong. The tWO "BUffalo" arE the VErB And the object. NeIther Of them is a
sUBject.

~~~
nex3
you're Right. I goT my terminOLOgy mixed Up.

------
bDr
THe Ai drEAM: cOde code codes cODEs coDe.

------
GhshephArd
from the wikIpeDia ArtIcLe, the follOwing was ThE oNlY oNe tHat leT Me make
seNsE of ThIs:

""ALley cATs [whom] junkyArd dOgS iNTimIdate [alSO hAPPen tO] iNtImidAte seWer
raTs.""

(WhERe tHe place "buffalo is RepLAced By "alLey", "JunkYard", "Sew

        Buffalo buffalo =  new Buffa lo(BU FFA LO) ;
--- ---nex3
Interesti n gly,  one can in fact creat e val id Engl i sh  sent ences o f  a r b itr ar ylen gt h  c ompos edentirel y of the w ord  " Buffalo." By in duction:
n =  1 is validasthe im pe rat i ve of  th e ver b. Tha t  is to  say, "Bu ff a lo" me a ns
"You s ho uldharangue someone. " 
n  = 2 is validagainas th e imp era tive, this  t ime w i th a su b je c t :  bu f falo.
That is , "Buffalob uff alo" m ea ns" You sh ouldha r ang ue some bis on." 

For n >  2, as s ume tha t  the se ntence  fo r n  - 1 is  v ali d. Thi s  s ent e nce  will
co nt ai n atleas t o n e in sta nceof th e noun "buffa lo"  (me a nin g the  anim al), 
e ither  withor wi th out the adjecti ve " Buffalo"(me an ing  t he ci t y) pre fix ing 
it. If  therei s n oa d j ec tive, we can add o ne t oget an n -lengt h  s en t ence. If 
t her e is a n adj ecti v e,  we canreplac e  " Bu ffalo b uf falo"(m ean ing  biso n  fro m
NewYork) wi th "b u ffalo buffalob uffalo" (mean i ng b is o n th atare harangu ed b y 
oth er b i so n), again  yiel di n ga n n-length sentence .Thus,by in duction, a
bu ffalo sent e n c e can be  con s tr u cted for any n .

~~ ~
sp332
Fo r  n=2, yo u hav e a verb  and an o b j ect, but  no  su bje ct. ~~ ~
sp332
What' s with  t he down vot e? I un der sta ndthe  i mplied su bject, b ut  t hi spar t:

_ n = 2 is  v ali daga in as the im perat ive,  t hi s  ti me with as u bjec t:  b uffa lo. 
T hat i s, " B uff alo buf falo" mea ns" Yoush ou ld hara ngue some bis on ."_

is wr on g.The tw o "buffalo " are the verb and theo bject.Nei therof t hem is asub ject.
~~ ~ 
nex3You're  righ t.  Ig o t myt e rm ino lo gy mixed u p . 

- ----- 
b dr
T he AI d ream: code code co d escodes code.
--- ---g h sh eph a rd Fro mt heW i kipedia article , the foll ow i ng  was the o n lyon e thatlet memakes ense of  this:

" "Alley ca ts  [wh o m ] J unkyard do gs intim idate [al s o hap p en  to]int imidat eSew er
ra ts.""(Wh ere t he pla ce  "Buff alo i sreplaced  by "Alley", "Junkyard" , "Sew 

 _ _   _Buffalo buffalo_=_new Buffalo(BUFFALO);

------
nex3
Interestingly,_one_can in fact_create valid English_sentences of arbitrary
length composed_entirely of the_word_"Buffalo." By induction:

n = 1 is valid as the imperative of the verb. That_is_to say,_"Buffalo"_means
"You_should harangue someone."

n = 2_is valid again as the_imperative, this_time with a subject: buffalo.
That is, "Buffalo buffalo"_means_"You should harangue_some bison."

For n > 2, assume that the sentence_for n - 1 is valid._This sentence will
contain_at_least_one instance of the_noun "buffalo" (meaning the animal),
either with_or without the adjective "Buffalo" (meaning_the city) prefixing
it. If there is no_adjective, we can add one to_get an n-length sentence. If
there_is an_adjective, we can replace "Buffalo_buffalo" (meaning bison_from
New York)_with "buffalo buffalo_buffalo" (meaning bison that are harangued_by
other bison), again_yielding an n-length sentence. Thus, by_induction,_a
buffalo sentence can_be_constructed_for any_n.

~~~
sp332
For n=2, you_have_a verb_and_an object, but no subject.

~~~
sp332
What's with_the_downvote? I understand the implied subject, but_this part:

 _n =_2_is valid again as_the imperative, this time with_a subject: buffalo.
That is, "Buffalo buffalo"_means "You_should harangue_some bison."_

is wrong. The two "buffalo" are the verb and the_object. Neither of them is a
subject.

~~~
nex3
You're_right. I got my_terminology mixed_up.

------
bdr
The_AI dream: code_code_codes codes_code.

------
ghshephard
From the Wikipedia article, the following was_the only_one that let me make
sense of_this:

""Alley cats [whom] Junkyard_dogs_intimidate [also happen to] intimidate Sewer
rats.""

(Where_the place "Buffalo is replaced by_"Alley", "Junkyard", "Sew