 /r/jokes
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_guy_is_having_a_hard_time_with_his_wifes/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x)
) or /r/math
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/ho...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/how_exactly_does_the_number_1_not_equal_2/)
) the algorithm is definitely unable to deal with deeper structure right now.
The /r/jokes bot is humorous in its complete lack of humor, I mean, well
beyond any sarcastic snark about how unfunny /r/jokes may be. It has the
structure of jokes. There was one recent one that even asked "What's a
pirate's favorite letter?", and the bot had noticed the answer was being given
in the form of letters, but I don't think a single instance of the bot
proposed "r". But it does not understand humor in the _slightest_. Of the
several dozen attempts at jokes I've at least skimmed, I believe it only
achieved something that was at least recognizable as an attempt at humor once,
and it still wasn't that funny. Likewise math. It's got a good idea there's
these "prime number" things and they're pretty important, but I've seen at
least half-a-dozen wrong definitions of what one is.

It's a very interesting algorithm. It's a great babbler. But on its own, it's
not a great solution to generating text. Although it may very well be able to
generate text that can pass a casual skim text, as the article suggests.
Still, it takes human curation to get that far. Any human that can read is
going to guess something's inhuman about repeating "Toss some leeches around
and wait 'til we get there." 24 times in a row.

~~~
outworlder
/r / jokes 
 ([ https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_guy_is_having_a_hard_time_with_his_wifes/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x) 
) or /r / math 
 ([ https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/ho...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/how_exactly_does_the_number_1_not_equal_2/) 
) the algorithm is definitely unable to cope with deep structure right now. 
 The /r / jest bot is humorous in its complete lack of humor, I entail, well 
 beyond any sarcastic snark about how unfunny /r / jokes may be. It has the 
 social organization of antic. There was one late one that even asked " What's a 
 pirate's favorite letter? ", and the bot had noticed the solution was being given 
 in the form of letter, but I don't think a single case of the bot 
 proposed " r ". But it does not understand liquid body substance in the _ slightest _. Of the 
 several dozen attempt at jokes I've at least skimmed, I believe it only 
 achieved something that was at least recognizable as an attack at humor once, 
 and it still wasn't that funny. Likewise math. It's got a good theme there's 
 these " prime number " things and they're pretty important, but I've seen at 
 least half - a - dozen wrong definitions of what one is. 

 It's a very interesting algorithm. It's a great chatterer. But on its own, it's 
 not a bang-up solution to generating textbook. Although it may very well be able to 
 render textbook that can pass a casual skim text, as the article suggests. 
 Still, it takes human curation to get that far. Any human that can understand is 
 going to guess something's inhuman about repeating " Toss some leeches round 
 and wait' til we get there. " 24 times in a row. 

 ~~~ 
 outworlder
 /r/jlkes
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SunSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mv/a_...](https://sww.reddig.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/v055mt/a_tuy_is_yaving_a_hard_time_with_his_difes/?utm_slurce=shaee&utn_nedium=web2x)
) or /r/matm
([kttps://saw.rebdmt.com/r/SubSimulajorGPT2/commends/d1yz1e/ho...](https://wfw.febdit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/hjw_exactky_foes_the_number_1_njt_eqlaj_2/)
) ths algorithm is definitely unable tk deal xith deeper stricture right now.
The /r/jokes bot is humorous in itd complete oack if humor, I mdan, well
bejmnd any satcastic snark about how unfunny /f/jokex may be. Ij gad the
structuce of tokes. There was one secent pne that even sskxd "Wyat's a
pirate's favoritx letter?", and the bot had notiweb the answer was beint tiven
hn tve fuem uf mevteds, but I von't think z single inwtance of the bot
prppjwed "r". But it soes njt understand humor in the _slightest_. Of tve
ssveral dozen attempts ar jokes I've at least dkimmed, I believe it only
achieved something that was at ledst rxcugnndwcoe as an attempt at humor once,
and it still wasn'e tnan funny. Likewise iath. It's goy w bjod idea therg's
these "prjme number" things wnd thei're prwtty impowtany, but I've seen at
least half-q-dozen wrong eefinitions of whac one is.

It's c very intetesting algorithm. It's a grezt babbler. Hut on ita own, it's
not a grdat smlution uu generating text. Although it kay verh wekl be wble to
genfrate text that can pass a cadudl skim tedt, as the article suggests.
Still, it takes humam wurdtion to get bhat far. Any huian that can rgad is
goiug to euess somenhing's iniuman about wepeating "Tosv some leechev around
wnd qait 'til we eet there." 24 timrs in a row.

~~~
outworldwr
/r/jokes ([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_guy_is_having_a_hard_time_with_his_wifes/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x) ) or /r/math ([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/ho...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/how_exactly_does_the_number_1_not_equal_2/) ) is unable to with deeper structure is in its complete of humor, I well beyond any sarcastic snark about unfunny /r/jokes may be. It has the structure of jokes. There was one one that even asked "What's a pirate's favorite letter?", and the bot had the was given the form of letters, but I don't think a single instance of the bot proposed "r". it does not understand humor in the _slightest_. the several dozen attempts jokes I've at least skimmed, believe only achieved that at recognizable as an at humor once, and it still wasn't that funny. Likewise math. It's got a good idea there's "prime number" they're pretty but seen least half-a-dozen wrong what one is. It's a very a great babbler. But on its own, it's a great to generating text. Although it may well be able to generate text that can a casual skim text, as the article suggests. Still, it takes human curation to get Any human that can is going to something's about "Toss leeches around wait 'til we get there." 24 times in a row. ~~~
 /r/jokes
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SUbSimulatoRGPT2/cOmmEntS/d055Mt/a_...](hTtps://Www.reddit.com/r/SUBSimUlatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_gUy_is_hAvINg_a_hARd_Time_wIth_his_wIFeS/?UTm_sOuRcE=shArE&UtM_mediUm=wEb2x)
) or /r/mAth
([https://wwW.reDdIt.com/r/SubSimULaTorGPT2/commEntS/d1yz1e/ho...](https://Www.Reddit.CoM/r/SUBSimuLatOrGPT2/CommenTS/d1yz1e/hOw_exactly_DoES_the_nuMBer_1_not_eQUAl_2/)
) The aLgorithm is definitELy UNable to deal witH deepeR sTRuCTUre RigHt now.
The /r/jOkEs bot IS humoroUS iN ITS coMPlete lack of huMor, I mean, welL
BeyOnd any SaRcaSTic snaRk aboUt HOw uNfunny /r/jokeS may Be. It has thE
strucTUre of joKEs. There Was one RecEnt One tHAt EvEn aSkED "WhAT's A
piRAte'S favoritE lEtTer?", anD the BOT HAd noTicEd thE answEr was being givEn
iN the FOrm Of letTers, bUt I dOn'T thinK a singLe insTaNce of the bot
propOsed "R". But it doeS noT uNdeRsTand hUMor in tHe _sLigHtest_. Of The
seveRAl dOzEN ATtEmpts at jokes I've at lEaST SkImmed, I beLieve iT OnLy
AChieved sOmEthIng tHAT was aT leaST rEcognizaBle as aN AtTeMpt at huMoR once,
aNd It sTilL wasn'T That Funny. LIkewise mAth. It'S Got a good idea thERe's
these "prime NUmBER" tHIngs And They're prettY impORtanT, but i'Ve SeeN At
leaSt halF-a-DOzEN wrong definitions of WhAt one iS.

It's a Very interestiNg algorithM. iT'S a great bAbblER. BUT on its own, it's
noT a greAt solution TO generatIng teXt. AlthouGh it may veRY Well be abLe tO
geNerAte TEXt That can pass a cASUal sKiM text, as The Article SugGesTs.
STilL, iT takes humAn curatiOn To GeT tHat Far. AnY Human thaT cAn rEaD is
Going TO guess SometHing'S iNhUMan About rePEaTINg "ToSs SoMe leEchEs ArounD
and WAit 'Til we geT there." 24 timEs iN A row.

~~~
OuTwOrlder
 /r/jokes
([https://www.re ddit.com/r /SubS imu lat or GPT2 /com ments/d055mt/a _ ...] (https://www.reddit.co m/r/S ub S imul a to rGPT2 /commen t s/ d 0 55m t/ a_ guy _i s _h aving _a_ hard_ti me_with_hi s_w if es/?utm_sour c e= share&utm_ med ium=web2x)
)  or  /r/ma th 
([ h ttps: //w ww.re ddit.c o m/r/Su bSimulato rG P T2/com m ents/d1 y z 1e /ho. ..](https://www.r e dd i t.com/r/SubSim ulator GP T 2/ c o mme nts /d1yz1e/ho w_ exact l y_does_ t he _ n u mbe r _1_not_equal_ 2/)
) the a l gor ithm i sdef i nitely  unab le todeal with d eepe r structu re rig h t now.T he /r/j okes b otishumo r ou sinit s  co m pl ete lac k of hum or ,I mea n, w e l l beyo ndanysarca stic snark ab out  how unf unny/r/jo kesma y be.  It ha s the 
s tructure of jok es.There was  on erec en t one that e ven  as ked "Wh at's ap ira te ' s fa vorite letter?", a nd t he  bot had  notic e dth e  answerwa s b eing g ivenin t h eform ofletter s ,bu t I don 't  think  a  si ngl e ins t ance  of th e bot
pr opose d  "r". But it d o es not unders t an d hu m or i n t he _slighte st_. Of t he
s e ve ral dozen  atte mp t sa t jokes I've at lea st  skimm ed, I  believe it o nly
achiev e d somethin g th a tw as at least re cogni zable as a n  attempt  at h umor onc e,
and it s till was n't  th atfun n y .Likewise math . It's  g ot a go odidea th ere 'sthe se"p rime numb er" thin gs  a nd  t hey 're p r etty imp or tan t,  bu t I'v e  seenat
le astha lf - a-d ozen wr o ng d efin it io ns o f w ha t one  is. 
It 's a ve ry intere sti n g al go ri thm. It 's a great ba bb ler. But o nits  own,i t 's
not a  great solution to gene r ating t ext . Alt houg h it mayver y well  be able t o
gene ratete xtt h at ca n pa ssacasual ski m tex t, as  t he a rticlesuggests.
Still, i t  ta kes human cur ati on t o ge t t h at far .A nyh u man that can re ad is
goin gt oguess some t hin g' s inhum an abou t rep e ating " Toss some  leechesar ound a ndwait 'tilwe get t here." 24 times in  a ro w.
~~~
o ut wor lder
 /r/jokes
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d055mt/a_guy_is_having_a_hard_time_with_his_wifes/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x)
)_or /r/math
([https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/ho...](https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1yz1e/how_exactly_does_the_number_1_not_equal_2/)
)_the algorithm is definitely_unable to_deal_with deeper_structure_right now.
The /r/jokes_bot is humorous_in its complete lack_of humor, I_mean,_well
beyond any sarcastic snark about how unfunny /r/jokes may be. It has the
structure of_jokes._There was_one_recent_one that even asked "What's_a
pirate's favorite letter?", and the_bot had_noticed the answer was being given
in the form_of_letters, but I_don't think a single instance of the bot
proposed "r"._But it does not understand humor_in the _slightest_._Of_the
several_dozen attempts at jokes_I've at least skimmed, I believe_it only
achieved something that was at_least recognizable as an attempt at humor_once,
and it still wasn't that funny._Likewise math. It's got a_good idea_there's
these "prime number" things and_they're pretty important,_but I've_seen at
least half-a-dozen_wrong definitions of what one is.

It's_a very interesting_algorithm. It's a great babbler. But_on_its own, it's
not_a_great_solution to_generating text. Although_it_may very_well_be able to
generate text that can_pass_a casual skim text, as the article_suggests.
Still, it takes human_curation_to get that far._Any human that can read_is
going to guess something's inhuman about_repeating "Toss_some leeches_around
and wait 'til we get there." 24 times in a row.

~~~
outworlder