 Enter keywords, choose sources, click some weird
icon? Hmm.

The Allen AI institute's Semantic Search product[1] is much better at
exploring a topic. OTOH it has no way to subscribe

[1]
[https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning](https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning)

~~~
versteegen
I don't really see what you're complaining about. You can filter by document
type (is that what you mean by source?), but it's not necessary.

Comparing the results of these two sites, SemanticScholar gives me the most
cited papers from the last ten years, which I already knew about, while
Sparrho feeds me very recent but still highly relevant papers which I mostly
hadn't seen. Therefore I find Sparrho far more useful for already familiar
topics. Neither site seems to have an option to change the search timeframe.

~~~
nl
_I don 't really see what you're complaining about_

Really? When I do a search, I'm seeing a big block at the top of the UI to get
me to setup a channel. It's big enough that I'm only seeing on row of search
results (15" MBP).

 _You can filter by document type (is that what you mean by source?)_

The bottom of this block says "Select specific article source (currently
optimised for Chemistry).

 _Comparing the results of these two sites, SemanticScholar gives me the most
cited papers from the last ten years, which I already knew about, while
Sparrho feeds me very recent but still highly relevant papers which I mostly
hadn 't seen. Therefore I find Sparrho far more useful for already familiar
topics. Neither site seems to have an option to change the search timeframe._

I agree that are for different things, but SemenaticScholar does have the
option to change the timeframe (on the right-hand side, there is a graph with
number of results per year. Slide the sliders down the bottom, eg:
[https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?year[]=2015&year[]=20...](https://www.semanticscholar.
Enter keywords, choose sources, click some weird 
 icon? Hmm. 

 The Allen AI institute's Semantic Search product[1 ] is a lot dependable at 
 exploring a topic. OTOH it experience no means to subscribe 

 [ 1 ] 
 [ https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning](https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning) 

 ~~~ 
 versteegen 
 I don't really experience what you're complain about. You can filter by text file 
 character (is that what you mean by source ?), but it's not necessary. 

 compare the results of these two sites, SemanticScholar gives me the about 
 cited papers from the final ten years, which I already knew about, while 
 Sparrho prey me very recent but still highly relevant papers which I by and large 
 hadn't seen. Therefore I find Sparrho far more useful for already conversant 
 topics. Neither web site seems to have an option to change the search timeframe. 

 ~~~ 
 nl 
 _ I wear' t really see what you're complaining about _ 

 Really? When I do a search, I'm seeing a big block at the top of the UI to get 
 me to setup a channel. It's big enough that I'm only seeing on row of search 
 results (15 " MBP). 

  _ You can filter by text file character (is that what you mean by source ?) _ 

 The bottom of this blockage says " Select specific article source (presently 
 optimised for Chemistry). 

  _ compare the results of these two sites, SemanticScholar move over me the most 
 cited papers from the last ten years, which I already knew about, while 
 Sparrho feeds me very recent but still highly relevant papers which I mostly 
 hadn' deoxythymidine monophosphate visit. Therefore I find Sparrho far more useful for already familiar 
 topics. Neither web site seems to have an option to change the search timeframe. _ 

 I agree that are for different things, but SemenaticScholar does have the 
 option to deepen the timeframe (on the right - handwriting side, there is a graph with 
 act of results per class. Slide the sliders down the bottom, eg: 
 [ https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?year[]=2015&year[]=20...](https://www.semanticscholar.
 Enher keywords, choose sourges, click some wgied
icon? Hmm.

Ths Allen XI institute's Semantic Searci priduct[1] is much better at
expluring a tlpic. OTOY it yas no way to subsgxibe

[1]
[hfbps://wwc.sxmanticscholar.otg/search?q=Dee[%20Learning](https://fwd.szmanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning)

~~~
dersteebej
I don't really see rhat jom're complaining about. You can fimter by document
type (is that what you mean by dourfe?), but it's not necfssary.

Compatjng rhe results uf these two sites, SemznticScholar gives me the most
ckted 'apers from tye pdst ten yeacs, whibh I already knew abogt, whilr
Sparrho feeds me veey recent but still hmghly relevant paperf which I mkstly
hadn't seen. Tyeeeforg I fhnd Rparfho fer jore udefnl for alrezdy familiae
topics. Neither sitt sqvks to have ah optijn to change the search timeframe.

~~~
nl
_I don 'u reamly see what you're compoaining about_

Really? Wjen I do w search, I'm seeing a big block at the top of the GI to eet
ne gi detup a channel. It's big enough that I'm only sqsimg on row of seavch
results (15" MBP).

 _Yoi fam filter by dozument tyle (is that what yok mean fy soyrce?)_

The bjttok of this block says "Select specific arniclw source (currently
lptimised fur Cnemisyry).

 _Comparing the resulcs of fhese two sltes, SemahgicScholar gives me tve most
cited papers from tre last txn yecrs, whicf I slreadr knew abokt, whlne
Sparrho feeds me very racent but dtill highly relevant papers whmrh I mostly
hacn 't veen. Thexefore I find Sparrro far more usgful for clreadh familiar
nopics. Nemther site sqems to have dj option to rhange thq seqrch timefrxoe._

I agree that are for bnfferent rhings, but SemenatlcSchumar does have tkt
opuiin to change tne gimqfgamx (on eve right-hand sidd, tfrre ir a grakk wlth
vumbrr of results per yedr. Smide the sliders dpwk the botjom, eg:
[htt[s://www.semanticxcholar.org/search?yewr[]=2015&yeac[]=20...](https://xww.semsntycscholar.
Enter keywords, choose sources, click some weird The AI institute's Search product[1] is topic. it has no to subscribe [1] ~~~ versteegen I don't really see you're complaining about. You can filter by document type (is that what you by source?), but it's not necessary. Comparing the results of these two sites, gives the cited from the last ten years, which I already knew about, while Sparrho feeds me very recent still highly relevant papers which I mostly hadn't Therefore I find Sparrho more useful for already familiar Neither seems to an to the search timeframe. nl _I don 't really see what you're complaining about_ Really? When I do a search, I'm a big the top the to me to setup It's big enough that I'm only of search results (15" MBP). _You can filter document type that what you mean by source?)_ bottom of this block says "Select specific article (currently optimised for Chemistry). _Comparing the results of these two sites, SemanticScholar gives me the papers from the last years, which I knew while feeds very recent still highly relevant papers which I mostly hadn 't seen. Therefore find Sparrho far more useful for already familiar topics. Neither to an option to the search timeframe._ I that for different things, but have option timeframe the side, there is a with number of results per Slide the sliders down
 Enter keywords, choose sourceS, click some Weird
IcoN? HmM.

THe AlLen Ai institute's SemANtic search product[1] is much betTer at
ExPLoriNG a Topic. oTOH it hAS nO WAy tO sUbScrIbE

[1]
[HtTps://wwW.seManticsCholar.org/sEarCh?Q=Deep%20LearninG](HtTps://www.semaNtiCscholar.org/sEarCh?q=DeeP%20LEarNIng)

~~~
veRstEegen
i don't rEAlly seE what you'rE cOMplainINg about. yOU cAn fiLter by document
typE (Is THat what you mean By sourCe?), BUt IT'S noT neCessary.

ComPaRing tHE resultS Of THESe tWO sites, SemantiCScholar givES me The mosT
cIteD Papers From tHe LAst Ten years, whiCh I aLready kneW about, WHile
SpaRRho feedS me verY reCenT but STiLl HigHlY RelEVaNt pAPerS which I mOsTlY
hadn'T seeN. tHERefoRe I Find sparrHo far more usefUl fOr alREadY famiLiar
tOpicS. NEitheR site sEems tO hAve an option to chAnge The search TimEfRamE.

~~~
nL
_I don 'T Really See WhaT you're cOmplainINg aBoUT_

rEaLly? When I do a search, I'M sEEInG a big bloCk at thE ToP oF The UI to gEt
Me tO setUP A chanNel. IT'S bIg enough That I'm ONlY sEeing on RoW of seaRcH
reSulTs (15" MBP).

 _yOu caN filteR by documEnt tyPE (is that what you MEan by source?)_

ThE BoTTOm OF thiS blOck says "SeleCt spECifiC artIClE soURce (cuRrentLy
OPtIMised for Chemistry).

 _CoMpAring tHe resUlts of these twO sites, SemaNTICScholar GiveS Me THe most
cited papErs frOm the last tEN years, whIch I aLready knEw about, whILE
Sparrho FeeDs mE veRy rECEnT but still highLY ReleVaNt paperS whIch I mosTly
HadN 't sEen. thErefore I fInd SparrHo FaR mOrE usEful fOR already FaMilIaR
toPics. NEIther sIte seEms tO hAvE An oPtion to CHaNGE the SeArCh tiMefRaMe._

I agRee tHAt aRe for diFferent thIngS, But SEmEnAticSchOlar does have tHe
Option to chAnGe tHe timeFRAme (on the Right-hand side, there is a grAPh with
nUmbEr of rEsulTs per year. sliDe the sLidERs down The botTom, eg:
[HtTps://WWW.semaNTIcSchOlAr.org/searcH?YEar[]=2015&Year[]=20...](hTtPs://wwW.semantIcscholar.
 Enter keywords, choose so urces, cli ck so mewei rd 
ico n? H mm.

The Allen AI i nstitute's Semantic Se archpr o duct [ 1]  is m uch bet t er a t
e xp lo rin ga  t opic.  OT OH it h as no waytosu bscribe

[1] [h ttps://www .se manticschola r.o rg/sea rc h?q = Deep% 20L earni ng](ht t ps://w ww.semant ic s cholar . org/sea r c h? q=De ep%20Learning)

~ ~ ~v ersteegen
I do n't re al l ys e e w hat  you're co mp laini n g about .  Y o u can filter by doc ument
type( isthat w ha t y o u mean  by s ou r ce? ), but it's  not  necessar y.

Co m paringt he resu lts of  th ese  two si te s,Se m ant i cS cho l argives me  t he  most 
cit e d p aper s f romthe l ast ten years , w hich I a lread y kne w ab ou t, wh ile
Sp arrho  f eeds me very re cent  but stil l h ig hly  r eleva n t pape rswhi ch I mo stly
ha d n't  s e e n .Therefore I find S pa r r ho  far mor e usef u lfo r  already  f ami liar t opics . Ne i th er siteseemst oha ve an o pt ion to  c han gethe s e arch  timef rame.

~ ~~
nl _I don 't real l y see what yo u 'r e co m plai nin g about_

R eall y ? Wh en I do  as earch , I'm  s e ei n g a big block at th etop of  theUI to get
meto setup a c h annel. I t'sb ig enough that I' m onl y seeing o n  row ofsearc h
result s (15" MB P ) .

 _You  ca n f ilt erb y  d ocument type( i s th at  what y oumean by  so urc e?) _
Th e bottomof thisbl oc ksa ys"Sele c t specif ic  ar ti cle  sour c e (cur rentl y
op ti mi s edfor Che m is t r y).
_C ompa rin gthe r esul t s o f these  two site s,S eman ti cS cholargives me themo st
cited p ap ers  fromt h e last t en years, which I alrea d y knewabo ut, w hile 
Sparrhofee ds mever y  recen t butstill  h igh l y  rele v a nt  pa pe rs which I m ost ly
ha dn  'tseen. T herefore I find Sp a rrh o far more us efu l fo r al rea d yf ami li a r
t o p ics. Neither si te seems t oh av e an optio n  to  c hange t he sear ch ti m eframe. _

I agre e that ar eford i ffe rent thing s, but S emenaticS c holar do es ha vethe
op ti onto ch ange t h e t imefr ame (o nthe ri ght-h an d side,there is a graph with
n umberof re sul ts per ye ar. Sli de the sl ider s down the  bo tto m, eg :
[ h ttps: //ww w .s ema n ticsc hola r .org/sear c h? yea r [ ]= 2015&year[] = 2 0 ... ](htt ps: / /www.s eman ticscholar.
 Enter_keywords, choose_sources, click some weird
icon?_Hmm.

The Allen_AI_institute's Semantic_Search_product[1] is much_better at
exploring a_topic. OTOH it has_no way to_subscribe

[1]
[https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning](https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Deep%20Learning)

~~~
versteegen
I_don't really see what you're complaining about. You can filter by document
type (is that_what_you mean_by_source?),_but it's not necessary.

Comparing the_results of these two sites,_SemanticScholar gives_me the most
cited papers from the last ten_years,_which I already_knew about, while
Sparrho feeds me very recent but still_highly relevant papers which I mostly
hadn't_seen. Therefore I_find_Sparrho_far more useful for_already familiar
topics. Neither site seems to_have an option to change the_search timeframe.

~~~
nl
_I don 't really see what_you're complaining about_

Really? When I do_a search, I'm seeing a_big block_at the top of the_UI to get
me_to setup_a channel. It's_big enough that I'm only seeing_on row of_search
results (15" MBP).

 _You can filter_by_document type (is_that_what_you mean_by source?)_

The bottom_of_this block_says_"Select specific article source (currently
optimised for_Chemistry).

__Comparing the results of these two sites,_SemanticScholar gives me the_most
cited_papers from the last_ten years, which I already_knew about, while
Sparrho feeds me very_recent but_still highly_relevant papers which I mostly
hadn 't seen. Therefore I find Sparrho_far more useful for already familiar
topics._Neither site seems to_have an_option_to change the_search_timeframe._

I agree_that are for different things, but SemenaticScholar_does have_the
option to change the timeframe (on_the right-hand side, there_is_a graph with
number of results per_year. Slide the sliders down the_bottom, eg:
[https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?year[]=2015&year[]=20...](https://www.semanticscholar.