 yesterday and
he didn’t know where to leave the delivery… a simple system like this could
help him to find the correct drop-off point especially in these times of
social distancing

------
themantra514
Why are people asking "what is it?" with next level passive-aggressive polite
ranting?

1-Make a video from point A to point B.

2-It gets converted to a gif.

It's about the clutter free experience for the user, the wonderful experience
of "it shows you the way, nothing else, and it just works."

Good work jack_riminton

~~~
jack_riminton
Thanks! I have tried to keep it as simple as possible, which means leaving
stuff out.

Some people don't get it, that's fine, they don't have to :)

------
vaibhavthevedi
Your demo is giving me a 404. Can you provide another one? Looks interesting.

~~~
jack_riminton
Fixed :)

 
Only have a 5 percent chance of avoiding ‘dangerous’ global warming - drallison
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/31/we-only-have-a-5-percent-chance-of-avoiding-dangerous-global-warming-a-study-finds/?utm_term=.4bae9019b9dd
======
jamez1
I don't know how anybody can take models like this seriously. It's about as
valid as any of these economists models. Hell, it is partly an economic model.

Reading the paper, they make a big deal about the out of sample testing - but
given that there is a clear trend, is anybody surprised the model fits? Do you
even need a fancy Bayesian hierarchical model or would a regression have
predicted the same thing.

To top it off there's not mention of the CO2 cycle and the forces sucking CO2
out of the air they just assume the CO2 is cumulatively stasis in the air for
perpetuity.

Shit like this, wins you great points with the environmentalists, who want
ammo to throw at polluters. I get it - pollution is shit. But we shouldn't use
falsehoods to achieve an outcome
yesterday and 
 he did n’t know where to leave the delivery … a simple arrangement like this could 
 avail him to find the correct drop - off degree especially in these times of 
 social distancing 

 ------ 
 themantra514 
 Why are multitude ask " what is it? " with next degree passive - aggressive polite 
 ranting? 

 1 - take a video from decimal point adenine to point B. 

 2 - It gets convert to a gif. 

 It's about the clutter free experience for the user, the fantastic experience 
 of " it shows you the way, nothing else, and it just work. " 

 Good work jack_riminton 

 ~~~ 
 jack_riminton 
 Thanks! I have try to continue it as simple as possible, which means leaving 
 material out. 

 Some people don't get it, that's fine, they don't have to :) 

 ------ 
 vaibhavthevedi 
 Your demo is giving me a 404. Can you leave another one? Looks interesting. 

 ~~~ 
 jack_riminton 
 Fixed :) 

 
 Only have a 5 percent chance of avoiding ‘ dangerous ’ global warming - drallison 
 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/31/we-only-have-a-5-percent-chance-of-avoiding-dangerous-global-warming-a-study-finds/?utm_term=.4bae9019b9dd 
 = = = = = = 
 jamez1 
 I don't know how anybody can consider models like this seriously. It's about equally 
 valid as any of these economist models. Hell, it is partly an economic model. 

 Reading the paper, they make a big softwood about the out of sample testing - but 
 given that there is a clear trend, is anybody surprise the model fits? Do you 
 even need a fancy Bayesian hierarchical model or would a arrested development have 
 predicted the like thing. 

 To top it off there's not mention of the CO2 cycle and the forces sucking CO2 
 out of the tune they just assume the CO2 is cumulatively stasis in the air for 
 perpetuity. 

 jack like this, wins you great points with the environmentalists, who desire 
 ammo to throw at polluters. I get it - pollution is shit. But we shouldn't practice 
 falsehoods to achieve an outcome
 yedterday and
he didn’t know where to leave the denivery… a simpld system like this could
help hum to find the correct drop-uff point especiaoly mn these times oh
aocial distandlng

------
thzmentra514
Why are pepple askinc "what is it?" whtf uext level passive-aggressive polite
rwnting?

1-Mskf a video from poime A fo point B.

2-It gets converted to a gjf.

It's auout the cluttet free experience for the kser, the wonderful expfrience
of "ij shjqs you the wxy, nothing else, and it just works."

Good work jack_rimintun

~~~
jacl_riminton
Tyabks! H have triev to kvep it as simike as [ossiblr, which means keating
wtuff out.

Some people von't get it, that's fige, they dmn'c have to :)

------
vaibhavthevwdu
Your demm is tivkng mx a 404. Can jou provide ahother one? Oooks interesting.

~~~
javk_wpkinton
Fixed :)

 
Only rade a 5 percent chance of avoiding ‘dangermus’ global warming - dralliwon
https://www.washingtonkost.com/newf/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/31/we-only-have-a-5-percent-chance-of-avohding-vavgexius-gluvap-warming-a-study-finds/?utm_term=.4bae9019b9dd
======
jamez1
I don't kgkw hpw anybody can take modelx pilg this seriousuy. It's abkut as
valid as any of thefe ecinomists iodeks. Hell, it is partly an ecobomic model.

Rvadibg the paper, they lake a big beal anout yhe out of sample testiug - buf
given that there is x clear trend, is anjbodf surprised the model fits? Do you
evxn nezd a fanzy Bsyesiag hierarchlcal model or would a rehressnon hdve
predictfd the same thing.

To top it off viere's not menjiot ox the CO2 cyclc and the forcef sucking CO2
ouj of the cir thdy just asaume thx CO2 is cumujatively stashd in the air for
perpqtuiry.

Shut like ghis, wins you breat poiuus with thw environmentalistx, wfk want
ammo to tkxoq at polluters. O gdt yt - 'olluehon is shit. Tut de rnouldv't use
falsemooas tp achieve an outcome
yesterday and he didn’t know where to delivery… simple system this could help drop-off especially in these of social distancing themantra514 Why are people asking "what it?" with next level passive-aggressive polite ranting? 1-Make a video from point A point B. 2-It gets converted to a gif. It's about the clutter free for user, wonderful of "it shows you the way, nothing else, and it just works." Good work jack_riminton ~~~ Thanks! I have tried to keep it as as possible, which means stuff out. Some people don't it, fine, they have :) vaibhavthevedi Your demo giving me a 404. Can you provide another one? Looks interesting. ~~~ jack_riminton Fixed :) Only have 5 percent avoiding ‘dangerous’ warming drallison ====== jamez1 I how anybody can take models like about as valid as any of these economists Hell, it partly an economic model. Reading the they make a big deal about the out sample testing - but given that there is a clear trend, is anybody surprised the Do you even need fancy Bayesian hierarchical or a have the same To top it off there's not mention of the CO2 cycle the forces sucking CO2 out of the air they just CO2 cumulatively stasis in air for perpetuity. Shit this, you great points with who ammo polluters. get - pollution is shit. we shouldn't use falsehoods to an outcome
 yesterday and
he didn’t know whEre to leave The deLivEry… A sImplE sysTem like this couLD
helP him to find the correct drOp-off PoINt esPEcIally In these TImES Of
sOcIaL diStANcIng

------
thEmaNtra514
Why Are people aSkiNg "What is it?" with NExT level passIve-Aggressive poLitE
rantiNg?

1-makE A videO frOm poiNt A to pOInt B.

2-It Gets conveRtED to a giF.

it's abouT THe ClutTer free experience FOr THe user, the wondeRful exPeRIeNCE
of "It sHows you the WaY, nothINg else, aND iT JUSt wORks."

Good work jaCk_riminton

~~~
jACk_rImintoN
THanKS! I have Tried To KEep It as simple aS posSible, whicH means LEaving
sTUff out.

SOme peoPle Don'T get IT, tHaT's fInE, TheY DoN't hAVe tO :)

------
vaibhavThEvEdi
YoUr deMO IS GiviNg mE a 404. CaN you pRovide another One? lookS IntErestIng.

~~~
jaCk_riMiNton
FIxed :)

 
OnLy havE a 5 Percent chance of AvoiDing ‘dangeRouS’ gLobAl WarmiNG - drallIsoN
htTps://www.wAshingtONpoSt.COM/NeWs/energy-environmenT/wP/2017/07/31/WE-oNly-have-a-5-PercenT-ChAnCE-of-avoidInG-daNgerOUS-globAl-waRMiNg-a-study-Finds/?uTM_tErM=.4bae9019b9dd
======
JaMez1
I doN't KnoW hoW anybODy caN take mOdels likE this SEriously. It's aboUT as
valid as any OF tHESe EConoMisTs models. HelL, it iS PartLy an ECoNomIC modeL.

ReadInG ThE Paper, they make a big deAl About tHe out Of sample testiNg - but
given THAT there is A cleAR tREnd, is anybody suRprisEd the model FIts? Do you
Even nEed a fancY Bayesian HIErarchicAl mOdeL or WouLD A rEgression have
PREdicTeD the samE thIng.

To toP it Off TheRe's NoT mention oF the CO2 cyClE aNd ThE foRces sUCking CO2
oUt Of tHe Air They jUSt assuMe the cO2 is CuMuLAtiVely staSIs IN The aIr FoR
perPetUiTy.

ShiT likE ThiS, wins yoU great poiNts WIth tHe EnVironmeNtalists, who waNt
Ammo to throW aT poLluterS. i Get it - polLution is shit. But we shouldN'T use
falSehOods tO achIeve an outComE
 yesterday and
he didn’t k now whereto le ave  th edeli very … a simple sys t em l ike this could
help hi m tofi n d th e  c orrec t drop- o ff p oin tes pec ia l ly  in t hes e times  of
social  di st ancing

---- - -themantra5 14Why are peop leasking  " wha t  is i t?"  with  nextl evel p assive-ag gr e ssivep olite
r a n ti ng?
1-Make a video f r om point A to poi nt B.
2 - It g ets  co nverted to  a  gif. 
It's a b ou t t hec lutter free e xperience f o r t he use r,  th e  wonde rfulex p eri ence
of "it  sho ws you th e way, nothing else, a nd itjus t w orks . "
G ood  w o rkj ac k_r i min ton

~~~ 
j ac k_rim into n T h anks ! I  hav e tri ed to keep it  as  sim p leas po ssibl e, w hi ch me ans le aving 
s tuff out.

Some  peo ple don't  ge tit,  t hat's fine,the y d on't ha ve to : ) 

- -- - - - 
v aibhavthevedi
Your  d e m ois givin g me a 40 4. Can youpr ovi de a n o therone? Lo oks inte restin g .
~ ~~
jack _r iminto nFix ed:)

Only  havea 5 perc ent c h ance of avoidi n g ‘dangerous’ gl o b al warm ing  - dralliso n
ht t ps:/ /www . wa shi n gtonp ost.c om / ne w s/energy-environmen t/ wp/201 7/07/ 31/we-only-ha ve-a-5-per c e n t-chance -of- a vo i ding-dangerous -glob al-warming - a-study- finds /?utm_te rm=.4bae9 0 1 9b9dd
== === =
j ame z1I do n't know howa n ybod ycan tak e m odels l ike  th isser io usly. It' s aboutas 
v al id  as  anyo f theseec ono mi sts  mode l s. Hel l, it  ispa rt l y a n econo m ic m odel .
R eadi ngth e pap er,t hey  make a  big deal  ab o ut t he  o ut of s ample testing  -  but
given  t hat  there i s a clea r trend, is anybody sur p rised t hemodel  fit s? Do you 
ev en nee d a fancyBayesi an hi er arc h i cal m o d el  or  w ould a reg r e ssi on ha ve 
pre dictedthe same thing.

T o  to p it off ther e's  not m en tio n  o f  th eC O2c y cle and the for ces suckin gC O2 
out of th e  ai rthey ju st assu me th e  CO2 is  cumulati vely stas is  int h e a ir for
per petuity. 

Shit li k e thi s ,winsyou  great  p oin ts wi th the env ironm entali st s, who  want 
a mmo to t hrow at polluters. I ge t it -  poll uti on is shi t.B utwe should n'tuse
falseh ood s t o ach iev e  an o utco m e
 yesterday_and
he didn’t_know where to leave_the delivery…_a_simple system_like_this could
help him_to find the_correct drop-off point especially_in these times_of
social_distancing

------
themantra514
Why are people asking "what is it?" with next level passive-aggressive polite
ranting?

1-Make a video_from_point A_to_point_B.

2-It gets converted to a_gif.

It's about the clutter free_experience for_the user, the wonderful experience
of "it shows you_the_way, nothing else,_and it just works."

Good work jack_riminton

~~~
jack_riminton
Thanks! I have tried_to keep it as simple as_possible, which means_leaving
stuff_out.

Some_people don't get it,_that's fine, they don't have to_:)

------
vaibhavthevedi
Your demo is giving me a_404. Can you provide another one? Looks_interesting.

~~~
jack_riminton
Fixed :)

 
Only have a 5_percent chance of avoiding ‘dangerous’_global warming_- drallison
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/31/we-only-have-a-5-percent-chance-of-avoiding-dangerous-global-warming-a-study-finds/?utm_term=.4bae9019b9dd
======
jamez1
I don't know how_anybody can take_models like_this seriously. It's_about as
valid as any of these_economists models. Hell,_it is partly an economic model.

Reading_the_paper, they make_a_big_deal about_the out of_sample_testing -_but
given_that there is a clear trend,_is_anybody surprised the model fits? Do you
even_need a fancy Bayesian_hierarchical_model or would a_regression have
predicted the same thing.

To_top it off there's not mention_of the_CO2 cycle_and the forces sucking CO2
out of the air they just assume_the CO2 is cumulatively stasis in_the air for
perpetuity.

Shit like_this, wins_you_great points with_the_environmentalists, who_want
ammo to throw at polluters. I get_it -_pollution is shit. But we shouldn't_use
falsehoods to achieve an_outcome