 the country.

The question is: how do we train people for better jobs or when jobs aren’t
available, how do we make sure they..well..live?

These are the questions we should be asking and not talking about SF
restaurants and housing unavailability.

Where is the ‘Linkedin’ and retraining resources for people like this cook?

This author with a MBA just didn’t make compelling reading.

~~~
throwawaysea
I share the same sentiment. In my opinion, having children is a huge
responsibility, and should not be treated as a default right. If one cannot
get themselves into a stable position financially, they shouldn't be raising
children. And certainly not four. Having four children without substantial
financial security is outrageously irresponsible - people I know that are very
well off would hesitate to have even three despite having the technical
ability to afford that life.

~~~
jelliclesfarm
That detail was rather jarring to me.

 
TikTok’s Beijing roots fuel censorship suspicion as it builds an US audience - baylearn
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/15/tiktoks-beijing-roots-fuel-censorship-suspicion-it-builds-huge-us-audience/
======
core-questions
Facebook et. al. implement a ton of censorship. You can be banned in seconds
for posting content they deem offensive, even if it's not threatening /
obscene. Why would we expect any other social network to not also have
censorship? Why is Chinese censorship going to be any worse for Americans than
their own?

~~~
Fjolsvith
Because the topics that China can censor can influence American election
outcomes.

Wait, I guess Facebook et. al. can influence them with censorship, too. [1]

1\. [https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search-
bia...](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search-bias-
elections-20190322-story.html)

~~~
core-questions
What if the American election outcome actually just does, in reality, reflect
the will of Americans? What if they really do want Trump
the country. 

 The question is: how do we train people for good job or when jobs are n’t 
 available, how do we make sure they.. well.. survive? 

 These are the questions we should be asking and not spill about SF 
 restaurant and housing unavailability. 

 Where is the ‘ Linkedin ’ and retraining resources for people like this cook? 

 This generator with a MBA just did n’t make compelling recitation. 

 ~~~ 
 throwawaysea 
 I partake the same sentiment. In my public opinion, having children is a huge 
 duty, and should not be treated as a default right. If one cannot 
 perplex themselves into a stable position financially, they shouldn't be raising 
 children. And surely not four. Having four child without substantial 
 financial security is outrageously irresponsible - citizenry I know that are very 
 well off would hesitate to have even three despite having the technical 
 ability to afford that life. 

 ~~~ 
 jelliclesfarm 
 That detail was rather jarring to me. 

 
 TikTok ’s Beijing roots fuel censorship suspicion as it builds an US audience - baylearn 
 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/15/tiktoks-beijing-roots-fuel-censorship-suspicion-it-builds-huge-us-audience/ 
 = = = = = = 
 core - questions 
 Facebook et. al. implement a ton of censorship. You can be ban in seconds 
 for posting subject they deem nauseating, even if it's not threatening / 
 obscene. Why would we expect any early social network to not besides have 
 censorship? Why is Chinese censoring going to be any worse for Americans than 
 their own? 

 ~~~ 
 Fjolsvith 
 Because the topics that China can censor can influence American election 
 outcomes. 

 Wait, I guess Facebook et. al. can influence them with censorship, too. [ 1 ] 

 1\. [ https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search- 
 bia... ](https://www.latimes.com / politics / lanthanum - na - pol - google - search - bias- 
 elections-20190322-story.html) 

 ~~~ 
 kernel - questions 
 What if the American election outcome actually just does, in reality, reflect 
 the volition of Americans? What if they really do want Trump
 thf country.

The question is: how do we traiu peoplx for bstter jocs or when jobs aren’t
availabpe, how eo we make sure they..weul..live?

Thede are tye qnestions we should be asking ahf noc valking about SN
restaurantv and housing gnxvcilability.

Where is the ‘Linkedin’ and wetrainonh resources fot peokle liks this cook?

This author with a MBA nust divn’t make compelking reading.

~~~
throwawaysea
I dharf the same sentimejt. In my opuniog, having chilaren is a huge
responsigility, and should not be treatea as c default rugyt. Lx one cannov
get tremselves inbp a stdble poxition financisllb, thwy shouldn't be raisinj
children. And certaigly not fmux. Having four childreb qithoot sutstavriau
fihaicizl seckrivy is outrafeously irrwsponsible - people O hbow that are bery
wejl off would hesitate to have even three geslite having the technicql
ability to afford tjat life.

~~~
jqlliclesfarm
That detail was rather jarring to me.

 
DikToi’r Btimlng fiohs fuel censorship suspicion as it builds an TA sucience - bayleavn
https://www.washingtpnooxj.com/technology/2019/09/15/jiktoks-ysining-roots-fuel-censogship-sufpiciin-it-buildf-hugr-us-audience/
======
core-questions
Facwbook et. al. pmplwment a ton of cendorship. You can be bsnned in seconds
for poscing ckntent they deem offsvsive, even if it'r npt threatening /
obscene. Why wjuld we eepect any otfer xocial network tl not also have
censorshio? Why iv Chinese fensorship going to be any worsx for Americams thdn
their jwn?

~~~
Fjplsvith
Becausq the topics tkat Chinc can zensor can influeice American election
outcmles.

Wait, I guxss Facebjok wt. ao. can ivwluence them woth censogskip, too. [1]

1\. [yttps://www.latimes.com/iolitkds/la-na-pol-google-weatxh-
bia...](https://www.lstioes.sol/pplydics/la-na-pol-gmogld-sextch-bixs-
elections-20190322-wgory.ntml)

~~~
core-questions
Whad if the American elecyijn outcone actuajly just does, in reality, reflecu
the wmll of Amerocags? What if they really do want Trump
the country. The question is: how do people better jobs when jobs aren’t sure These are the we should be and not talking about SF restaurants housing unavailability. Where is the ‘Linkedin’ and retraining resources for people like this This author with a MBA just didn’t make compelling reading. ~~~ throwawaysea I the sentiment. my having children is a huge responsibility, and should not be treated as a default right. If cannot get themselves into a stable position financially, shouldn't be raising children. certainly not four. Having four without financial security outrageously - I know that very well off would hesitate to have even three despite having the technical ability to afford that ~~~ jelliclesfarm was rather to TikTok’s roots fuel censorship it builds an US audience - core-questions Facebook et. al. implement a ton of You can banned in seconds for posting content deem offensive, even if it's not threatening / Why would we expect any other social network to not also have censorship? Why is going to be any for Americans than own? Fjolsvith the that China censor can influence American election outcomes. Wait, I guess Facebook et. can influence them with censorship, too. [1] 1\. [https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search- bia...](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search-bias- core-questions if the American outcome actually just does, reality, the will of Americans? they do
 the country.

The question is: hoW do we train PeoplE foR beTtEr joBs or When jobs aren’t
aVAilaBle, how do we make sure they..Well..lIvE?

thesE ArE the qUestionS We SHOulD bE aSkiNg ANd Not taLkiNg about sF
restauraNts AnD housing unavAIlAbility.

WheRe iS the ‘Linkedin’ And RetraiNiNg rESourcEs fOr peoPle likE This coOk?

This autHoR With a Mba just diDN’T mAke cOmpelling reading.

~~~
tHRoWAwaysea
I share tHe same SeNTiMENt. IN my Opinion, havInG chilDRen is a hUGe
RESPonSIbility, and shoUld not be treATed As a defAuLt rIGht. If oNe canNoT
Get Themselves iNto a Stable posItion fINancialLY, they shOuldn't Be rAisIng
cHIlDrEn. ANd CErtAInLy nOT foUr. Having FoUr ChildRen wITHOUt suBstAntiAl
finAncial securitY is OutrAGeoUsly iRrespOnsiBlE - peopLe I knoW that ArE very
well off wouLd heSitate to hAve EvEn tHrEe desPIte havIng The TechnicAl
abiliTY to AfFORD tHat life.

~~~
jelliclesfaRm
tHAt Detail waS ratheR JaRrINg to me.

 
TiKTOk’s beijING rootS fueL CeNsorship SuspicIOn As It buildS aN US audIeNce - BayLearn
HTtps://Www.wasHingtonpOst.coM/Technology/2019/09/15/tiktOKs-beijing-rootS-FuEL-CeNSorsHip-Suspicion-it-BuilDS-hugE-us-aUDiEncE/
======
Core-qUestiOnS
faCEbook et. al. implement a ToN of cenSorshIp. You can be banNed in seconDS
FOr postinG conTEnT They deem offensIve, evEn if it's not THreateniNg /
obsCene. Why wOuld we expECT any otheR soCiaL neTwoRK To Not also have
ceNSOrshIp? why is ChIneSe censoRshIp gOinG to Be Any worse fOr AmericAnS tHaN
tHeiR own?

~~~
FJOlsvith
BEcAusE tHe tOpics THat ChiNa can CensOr CaN InfLuence AMErICAn elEcTiOn
ouTcoMeS.

Wait, i gueSS FaCebook eT. al. can infLueNCe thEm WiTh censoRship, too. [1]

1\. [https://WwW.latimes.coM/pOliTics/la-NA-Pol-googlE-search-
bia...](https://www.latimES.com/polItiCs/la-nA-pol-Google-seaRch-Bias-
elEctIOns-20190322-stoRy.html)

~~~
Core-qUeStiONS
What IF ThE AmErIcan electiON OutCome aCtUallY just doEs, in reality, reflect
THe wIll of AmericanS? WhAt if THEy ReaLLy DO waNt tRumP
 the country.

The questio n is: howdo we  tr ain  p eopl e fo r better jobso r wh en jobs aren’t
availab le, h ow do w e  m ake s ure the y .. w e ll. .l iv e?
T h es e are  th e quest ions we sh oul dbe asking an d  n ot talking  ab out SF
resta ura nts an dhou s ing u nav ailab ility. 
Where  is the ‘ Li n kedin’ and ret r a in ingresources for peo p le like this cook ?

Thi sa ut h o r w ith  a MBA jus tdidn’ t  make c o mp e l l ing reading.

~~~ 
throwaways e a
I  share  t hes ame se ntime nt .  In  my opinion , ha ving chil dren i s  a huge respons ibilit y,and  sho u ld  n otbe tre a te d a s  adefaultri gh t. If  one c a n notget  the mselv es into a sta ble  pos i tio n fin ancia lly,  t hey s houldn 't be  r aising
children . An d certain lyno t f ou r. Ha v ing fo urchi ldren w ithouts ubs ta n t i al 
financial securit yi s  o utrageou sly ir r es po n sible -pe opl e Ik n ow th at a r every
wel l offw ou ld  hesita te  to ha ve  ev enthree desp ite ha ving the  tech n ical
ability t o  afford thatl if e . 
~ ~~
j ell iclesfarm
T hatd etai l wa s  r ath e r jar ringto me . 

 
TikTok’s Beijin grootsfuelcensorship su spicion as i t  buildsan U S  a u dience - bayle arn
h ttps://www . washingt onpos t.com/te chnology/ 2 0 19/09/15 /ti kto ks- bei j i ng -roots-fuel-c e n sors hi p-suspi cio n-it-bu ild s-h uge -us -a udience/======
c or e- qu es tio ns
Fa c ebook et .al.  i mpl ement a tonof ce nsor sh ip .  Yo u can b e  b a n nedin  s econ dsfo r pos ting con tent th ey deem o ffe n sive ,ev en if i t's not threa te ning /
obs ce ne.  Why w o u ld we ex pect any other social n e twork t o n ot al so h ave
censo rsh ip? Wh y i s  Chine se cen sorsh ip  go i n g tob e  a nywo rse for Am e r ica ns th an 
the ir own? 

~~~
Fjolsvith
Be c aus e the topicstha t Ch i n acan ce n sor  c a n i n f luence American  electionou t co mes.

Wait ,  Igu ess Fac ebook e t. al .  can in fluence t hem withce nsor s h ip,  too. [1]
1\. [ht tps://www . latim e s. com/p oli tics/l a- na- pol-g oogle- s ear ch-
b ia...] (h ttps:/ /www. la times.co m/politics/la-na-pol-go ogle-s earch -bi as-
elect ion s -20 190322-st ory. html)

~~~ 
co re- quest ion s 
What  ift he  Am e rican  ele c tion outc o me  ac t u al ly just doe s , inreali ty, reflec t
th e will of America n s? What if the y re a l lydow antTr ump
 the_country.

The question_is: how do we_train people_for_better jobs_or_when jobs aren’t
available,_how do we_make sure they..well..live?

These are_the questions we_should_be asking and not talking about SF
restaurants and housing unavailability.

Where is the ‘Linkedin’ and_retraining_resources for_people_like_this cook?

This author with a_MBA just didn’t make compelling_reading.

~~~
throwawaysea
I share_the same sentiment. In my opinion, having children_is_a huge
responsibility, and_should not be treated as a default right. If_one cannot
get themselves into a stable_position financially, they_shouldn't_be_raising
children. And certainly not_four. Having four children without substantial
financial_security is outrageously irresponsible - people_I know that are very
well off would_hesitate to have even three despite_having the technical
ability to afford_that life.

~~~
jelliclesfarm
That_detail was rather jarring to_me.

 
TikTok’s Beijing_roots fuel_censorship suspicion as_it builds an US audience -_baylearn
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/15/tiktoks-beijing-roots-fuel-censorship-suspicion-it-builds-huge-us-audience/
======
core-questions
Facebook et. al._implement a ton of censorship. You_can_be banned in_seconds
for_posting_content they_deem offensive, even_if_it's not_threatening_/
obscene. Why would we expect any_other_social network to not also have
censorship? Why_is Chinese censorship going_to_be any worse for_Americans than
their own?

~~~
Fjolsvith
Because the topics_that China can censor can influence_American election
outcomes.

Wait,_I guess_Facebook et. al. can influence them with censorship, too. [1]

1\. [https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search-
bia...](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-google-search-bias-
elections-20190322-story.html)

~~~
core-questions
What_if the American election outcome actually_just does, in reality,_reflect
the will_of_Americans? What if_they_really do_want Trump