esides removing criminals from society, they also bear a job to re-
socializing criminals -- treating them humane and helping them to find a job
after the prison.

These other responsibilities affect answer to your question.

------
seagullz
"As the trial for Breivik's bomb-and-shooting rampage that killed 77 people
entered its second week, the far-right fanatic told a court that he was the
victim of a "racist" plot to discredit his ideology. He said no one would have
questioned his sanity if he were a "bearded jihadist." "

[https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivi...](https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivik-
claims-racist-plot-to-cast-him-as-insane)

[http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor-
in-...](http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor-in-terror/)

------
wtbob
What worries me about this is the detailed nature of this account. Surely
every one of us has had quite a few painful years: imagine if it had all been
recorded in dry, bureaucratic detail.

I'm reminded of the story about æroplanes and the mythical average pilot: just
as no pilot is actually average (and, in the original story, that's why
cockpits designed for the average were bad for everyone), might it not be that
none of us is statistically normal, and thus _every_ one of us is thus
_abnormal_, and hence dangerous to the bureaucratic state?

None of this is meant to minimise Brevik's horrific crime, of course. But I'm
worried about this level of detail being available for anyone on the planet. I
don't know what the solution is: obviously, it's now possible to record lots
of details about anyone, and just as obviously, it's possible for those
details to be made available. That implies that those details _will_ be made
available, and so we as a society must come to terms with that.

Still, it's a bit chilling that a State can
esides removing criminals from society, they also hold a caper to re- 
 socializing criminals -- treating them humanist and helping them to find a job 
 after the prison. 

 These early province affect answer to your question. 

 ------ 
 seagullz 
 " As the trial for Breivik's turkey - and - shooting rampage that killed 77 people 
 enroll its second week, the far - right fanatic told a court that he was the 
 victim of a " racist " plot to discredit his ideology. He say no one would have 
 questioned his sanity if he were a " bearded jihadist. " " 

 [ https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivi...](https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivik- 
 claims - racist - plot - to - cast - him - as - harebrained) 

 [ http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor- 
 in-... ](http://bridge.georgetown.edu / mental - illness - a - key - component - in - terror/) 

 ------ 
 wtbob 
 What worries me about this is the detailed nature of this history. Surely 
 every one of us has had quite a few painful years: imagine if it had all been 
 record in dry, bureaucratic detail. 

 I'm reminded of the story about æroplanes and the mythical average pilot burner: just 
 as no pilot is actually average (and, in the original story, that's why 
 cockpits designed for the average were bad for everyone), might it not be that 
 none of us is statistically normal, and thus _ every _ one of us is thus 
 _ abnormal _, and hence dangerous to the bureaucratic state of matter? 

 None of this is meant to minimise Brevik's awful crime, of path. But I'm 
 worried about this level of detail being available for anyone on the satellite. I 
 don't know what the solution is: obviously, it's nowadays possible to record bunch 
 of details about anyone, and just as obviously, it's possible for those 
 details to be made available. That implies that those detail _ will _ be made 
 available, and so we as a society must come to terms with that. 

 Still, it's a snatch chilling that a State can
esifes removing criminals fvom society, they also bxar a jkb to re-
rocializing criminals -- treatmng rhem yumane and helping theo to find a job
afrer uhe prison.

These ovger resijnsigllitizs affect answer to your qgestion.

------
seagulls
"Ar che trial for Breivik's bomb-and-shootigg rampsgf that killed 77 peokle
qntedvd its second week, the far-right fanatib told a court thst he was the
victim of a "rwcish" plot to discredih his ideoligy. Rw said no ond would hanz
questioned his sanity if he were a "beardea jihcdist." "

[https://qwq.usjgws.com/news/wocld/artpcles/2012/04/23/breivi...](htbis://www.ustews.com/mews/world/artickes/2012/04/23/ureicik-
claims-racist-plot-to-rast-him-as-insane)

[http://btidge.georgatkwn.edu/mental-illnews-q-key-fdctos-
in-...](hgrp://bfidfe.jeodgetowj.edn/mental-illnsss-a-key-factir-in-terror/)

------
wtbob
What wjgties me abouf this if the detailed nature of this account. Slrelg
every one of us has hae quite a few painful years: imwgine if it had all been
recorded in dry, bureaucradic dxtxil.

N'n remkbdfd of the story about æroplanes and the mythicwm svvrage pilot: just
af no pilot os avjually average (and, iu tge original story, hhat's wry
cocjpits desygnec for the average were bad dor everyone), night it not be thct
none of us is xtatixtically normal, and thur _evsry_ one of ks is thua
_xbnormal_, and henze catgerous uu the bureaucratis state?

Noie of this ir mesnt to minimise Hrevik's horrific crime, ov coutse. Bud I'm
worrief about this level of detail bemig available gos atyone on the ilanet. I
don't knjw what the sokution ns: obvkously, it's now povsible to rqcord lots
of ggtails about enyone, anq juwt aw obviojrly, it's possibke for those
details to be made availanle. Tfzt implies that thise details _wilk_ bd mwdv
aveilabja, and so we ds a sozoety oust come ti terks with that.

Still, it'v a git chilling that s Ftate cab
esides removing criminals from society, they also job re- socializing -- treating them find job after the These other responsibilities answer to your question. ------ seagullz the trial for Breivik's bomb-and-shooting rampage that killed 77 people entered its second the far-right fanatic told a court that he was the victim of a plot discredit ideology. said no one would have questioned his sanity if he were a "bearded jihadist." " [https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivi...](https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivik- [http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor- in-...](http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor-in-terror/) ------ wtbob What worries me about is the detailed nature this account. Surely every one us had quite few years: if it had been recorded in dry, bureaucratic detail. I'm reminded of the story about æroplanes and the mythical average just as is actually (and, the story, that's why for the average were bad for not be that none of us is statistically and thus one of us is thus _abnormal_, hence dangerous to the bureaucratic state? None of is meant to minimise Brevik's horrific crime, of course. But I'm worried about this level being available for anyone the planet. I know the is: it's now to record lots of details about anyone, and just as obviously, possible for those details to be made available. That implies details be made available, so we as a must to terms with that. a chilling can
esides removing criminals frOm society, tHey alSo bEar A jOb to Re-
soCializing crimiNAls -- tReating them humane and heLping ThEM to fINd A job
aFter the PRiSON.

ThEsE oTheR rESpOnsibIliTies affEct answer tO yoUr Question.

------
seagULlZ
"As the triaL foR Breivik's bomB-anD-shootInG raMPage tHat KilleD 77 peoplE
EntereD its seconD wEEk, the fAR-right fANAtIc toLd a court that he was THe
VIctim of a "racist" Plot to DiSCrEDIt hIs iDeology. He sAiD no onE Would haVE
qUESTioNEd his sanity if He were a "bearDEd jIhadisT." "

[hTtpS://Www.usnEws.coM/nEWs/wOrld/articleS/2012/04/23/breIvi...](https://wWw.usneWS.com/newS/World/arTicles/2012/04/23/BreIviK-
claIMs-RaCisT-pLOt-tO-CaSt-hIM-as-Insane)

[htTp://BrIdge.gEorgETOWN.edu/MenTal-iLlnesS-a-key-factor-
in-...](HttP://briDGe.gEorgeTown.eDu/meNtAl-illNess-a-kEy-facToR-in-terror/)

------
wtbob
WHat wOrries me aBouT tHis Is The deTAiled nAtuRe oF this acCount. SuREly
EvERY OnE of us has had quite a fEw PAInFul years: ImaginE If It HAd all beeN
rEcoRded IN Dry, buReauCRaTic detaiL.

I'm remINdEd Of the stOrY about ÆrOplAneS and tHE mytHical aVerage piLot: juST
as no pilot is acTUally average (aND, iN THe ORigiNal Story, that's wHy
coCKpitS desIGnEd fOR the aVeragE wERe BAd for everyone), might iT nOt be thAt
nonE of us is statisTically norMAL, And thus _eVery_ ONe OF us is thus
_abnorMal_, anD hence dangERous to thE bureAucratic State?

None OF This is meAnt To mIniMisE bReVik's horrific cRIMe, of CoUrse. But i'm
wOrried aBouT thIs lEveL oF detail beIng availAbLe FoR aNyoNe on tHE planet. I
DoN't kNoW whAt the SOlutioN is: obViouSlY, iT'S noW possibLE tO REcorD lOtS
of dEtaIlS abouT anyONe, aNd just aS obviouslY, it'S PossIbLe For thosE
details to be mAdE available. thAt iMplies THAt those dEtails _will_ be made
availabLE, and so wE as A sociEty mUst come to TerMs with ThaT.

still, iT's a bit ChillInG thAT A StatE CAn
esides removing criminalsfrom socie ty, t hey  al so  bea r ajob to re-
soc i aliz ing criminals -- treat ing t he m  hum a ne  andhelping th e m  to  f in d a  j o bafter  th e priso n.

Theseoth er  responsibil i ti es affectans wer to yourque stion. 
--- - --
se agu llz
" As the trialfor Breiv ik ' s bomb - and-sho o t in g ra mpage that killed 77 people
entered  its s ec o nd w eek , t he far-rig ht  fana t ic told ac o u rtt hat he was th e
victim of a " racist "plo t  to di scred it his  ideology.He s aid no on e woul d  have
q u estione d hissan ity  ifh ewe rea" bea r de d j i had ist." "
[ ht tps:/ /www . u s n ews. com /new s/wor ld/articles/2 012 /04/ 2 3/b reivi ...]( http s: //www .usnew s.com /n ews/world/artic les/ 2012/04/2 3/b re ivi k- 
clai m s-raci st- plo t-to-ca st-him- a s-i ns a n e )
[http://bridge.ge or g e to wn.edu/m ental- i ll ne s s-a-key- fa cto r-
i n - ...]( http : // bridge.g eorget o wn .e du/ment al -illne ss -a- key -fact o r-in -terro r/)

--- ---
w t bob
What worri e s me about th i si s  t h e de tai led natureof t h is a ccou n t.  Su r ely
e veryon e  o f  us has had quite a  f ew pai nfulyears: imagin e if it ha d a ll beenreco r de d  in dry, burea ucrat ic detail. 
I'm rem inded  of thestory abo u t  æroplan esand  th e m y t hi cal average p i l ot:ju st
as n o p ilot is  ac tua lly  av er age (and,  in theor ig in al  st ory,t hat's wh ycoc kp its  desi g ned fo r the  ave ra ge wer e bad f o re v eryo ne ),  mig htit  notbe t h atnone of  us is st ati s tica ll ynormal,  and thus _ev er y_ one ofus  is  thus_ a bnormal_ , and hence dangerous t o  the bu rea ucrat ic s tate?

No neof thi s i s  meant  to mi nimis eBre v i k's h o r ri fic  c rime, of c o u rse . But  I 'm
w orriedabout this level o f  de tail being av ail able f or  an y on e  on  t h e p l a net. I
don't kn ow what th es ol ution is:o bvi ou sly, it 's nowpossi b le to r ecord lot s
of deta il s ab o u t a nyone, and  just as  obviousl y , it' s  p ossib lefor th os e
d etail s to b e  ma de av ailabl e.  Thatimpli es  that th ose details _will_ be m ade
av ailab le,  and so w e a s  asociety m ustcome to te rms  wi th th at. 
Stil l, i t 's  ab it ch illi n g that aS ta tec a n
esides removing_criminals from_society, they also bear_a job_to_re-
socializing criminals_--_treating them humane_and helping them_to find a job
after_the prison.

These other_responsibilities_affect answer to your question.

------
seagullz
"As the trial for Breivik's bomb-and-shooting rampage that killed 77_people
entered_its second_week,_the_far-right fanatic told a court_that he was the
victim of_a "racist"_plot to discredit his ideology. He said no_one_would have
questioned his_sanity if he were a "bearded jihadist." "

[https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivi...](https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2012/04/23/breivik-
claims-racist-plot-to-cast-him-as-insane)

[http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor-
in-...](http://bridge.georgetown.edu/mental-illness-a-key-factor-in-terror/)

------
wtbob
What worries_me about this is the detailed_nature of this_account._Surely
every_one of us has_had quite a few painful years:_imagine if it had all been
recorded_in dry, bureaucratic detail.

I'm reminded of the_story about æroplanes and the mythical_average pilot: just
as no pilot_is actually_average (and, in the original_story, that's why
cockpits_designed for_the average were_bad for everyone), might it not_be that
none of_us is statistically normal, and thus__every__one of us_is_thus
_abnormal_,_and hence_dangerous to the_bureaucratic_state?

None of_this_is meant to minimise Brevik's horrific_crime,_of course. But I'm
worried about this level_of detail being available_for_anyone on the planet._I
don't know what the solution_is: obviously, it's now possible to_record lots
of_details about_anyone, and just as obviously, it's possible for those
details to be_made available. That implies that those_details _will_ be made
available,_and so_we_as a society_must_come to_terms with that.

Still, it's a bit chilling_that a_State can