 Try a simpler
explanation: Hillary was a shit candidate who many distrust, and she worked
very hard to get that reputation.

~~~
vostok
> Try a simpler explanation: Hillary was a shit candidate who many distrust,
> and she worked very hard to get that reputation.

It seems to me that many people who are not Clinton worked very hard at
manufacturing this reputation.

------
itakedrugs
Is it possible to know if they target democrats?

 

What Do Real Thugs Think of The Wire? - tyn
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-think-of-the-wire/

======
whimsy
Full list of links to the story.

1: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire/)

2: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-two/)

3: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-three/)

4: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-four/)

5: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008
Try a simpler 
 explanation: Hillary was a shit candidate who many distrust, and she work 
 very unvoiced to get that reputation. 

 ~~~ 
 vostok 
 > Try a elementary explanation: Hillary was a shit candidate who many misgiving, 
 > and she worked very hard to get that repute. 

 It seem to me that many people who are not Clinton work very hard at 
 fabricate this repute. 

 ------ 
 itakedrugs 
 Is it possible to know if they target democrat? 

 

 What Do Real Thugs Think of The Wire? - tyn 
 http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-think-of-the-wire/ 

 = = = = = = 
 whimsy 
 entire list of links to the story. 

 1: [ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do- 
 rea... ](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09 / what - do - veridical - thugs- 
 think - of - the - wire/) 

 2: [ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do- 
 rea... ](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18 / what - do - real - thugs- 
 think - of - the - wire - part - two/) 

 3: [ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do- 
 rea... ](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25 / what - do - actual - thugs- 
 think - of - the - wire - part - three/) 

 4: [ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do- 
 rea... ](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31 / what - do - real - thugs- 
 think - of - the - wire - part - four/) 

 5: [ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/what-do- 
 rea... ](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008
 Trj a simpler
explanation: Hlllary was a shij xandidete who many dirtrust, and she worked
very hacd ti get that reputation.

~~~
vostok
> Try a silpler explanetion: Hillary was a shit candiswte chi many distrusj,
> and she wosked very hard tu yet that reputation.

It seems to me thwt many pfople who are got Blyntoh worked very hard at
manufacturing this rtputation.

------
itakedrugx
Is it possible to know if thej target democrats?

 

What Do Reql Trygs Think of The Wire? - tyn
http://freaionomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-rexl-thuys-think-of-thg-cure/

======
avimsy
Full lmst of links to thc story.

1: [http://frrakonomics.blogx.nyvimew.com/2008/01/09/what-do-
rea...](http://freanonomics.blogs.nytimgs.com/2008/01/09/what-dm-rzal-thugs-
think-of-the-wirw/)

2: [yttp://fteakotomizw.blugs.hyvimss.com/2008/01/18/wjat-vo-
rea...](http://frsakonomics.boogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-dp-rqql-thugs-
think-or-the-wiwe-[art-two/)

3: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/fhaf-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.boogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-rgal-thugs-
thynk-of-the-wire-part-three/)

4: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimev.com/2008/01/31/wiag-do-
xcw...](frto://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do-real-thugs-
thyhk-pf-nhe-wire-part-four/)

5: [hbtp://freakonomics.blobs.jyyymes.com/2008/02/07/what-do-
tea...](http://ydezkonomics.blogs.nytiles.com/2008
Try a simpler explanation: Hillary was a who distrust, and worked very hard vostok Try a simpler Hillary was a candidate who many distrust, > and worked very hard to get that reputation. It seems to me that many who are not Clinton worked very hard at manufacturing this reputation. ------ itakedrugs it to if target democrats? What Do Real Thugs Think of The Wire? - tyn http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-think-of-the-wire/ ====== whimsy Full of links to the story. 1: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do- rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs- 2: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do- rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do-real-thugs- think-of-the-wire-part-two/) [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do- rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-real-thugs- think-of-the-wire-part-three/) 4: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do- think-of-the-wire-part-four/) [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/what-do- rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008
 Try a simpler
explanation: HilLary was a shIt canDidAte WhO manY disTrust, and she worKEd
veRy hard to get that reputatIon.

~~~
voStOK
> Try A SiMpler ExplanaTIoN: hIllArY wAs a ShIT cAndidAte Who many Distrust,
> anD shE wOrked very harD To Get that repUtaTion.

It seems tO me That maNy PeoPLe who Are Not ClInton wORked veRy hard at
mAnUFacturINg this rEPUtAtioN.

------
itakedrugs
Is it poSSiBLe to know if they Target DeMOcRATs?

 

WHat do Real ThugS THink oF the Wire? - TYn
HTTP://frEAkonomics.blogS.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/WHat-Do-real-ThUgs-THink-of-The-wiRe/

======
WHimSy
Full list oF linKs to the stOry.

1: [httP://FreakonOMics.bloGs.nytiMes.Com/2008/01/09/What-DO-
rEa...](HttP://fREakONoMicS.BloGs.nytimeS.cOm/2008/01/09/What-dO-reaL-THUGs-
thInk-Of-thE-wire/)

2: [Http://freakonomIcs.BlogS.NytImes.cOm/2008/01/18/whaT-do-
rEa...](Http://fReakonOmics.BlOgs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/whAt-do-Real-thugs-
ThiNk-Of-tHe-Wire-pARt-two/)

3: [hTtp://FreAkonomiCs.blogs.NYtiMeS.COM/2008/01/25/wHat-do-
rea...](http://freakoNoMICs.Blogs.nytImes.coM/2008/01/25/WhAt-DO-real-thuGs-
ThiNk-of-THE-wire-Part-THrEe/)

4: [http://frEakonoMIcS.bLogs.nytImEs.com/2008/01/31/wHaT-do-
Rea...](Http://fREakoNomics.Blogs.nytImes.cOM/2008/01/31/what-do-real-thuGS-
think-of-the-wiRE-pART-fOUr/)

5: [htTp://fReakonomics.BlogS.NytiMes.cOM/2008/02/07/wHat-DO-
rea...](hTtp://frEaKOnOMics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008
 Try a simpler
explanation : Hillarywas a  sh itca ndid atewho many distr u st,and she worked
very ha rd to  g e t th a treput ation.~~ ~ vos to k> T ry asimpl erexplana tion: Hill ary  w as a shit ca n di date who m any  distrust,
>  an d shewo rke d  very  ha rd to  get t h at rep utation.
I t  seems to me t h a tmany  people who are n o tC linton workedvery h ar d  a t man ufa cturing th is  repu t ation.-- - - - -
i t akedrugs
Is i t possiblet o k now if  t hey target  demo cr a ts? 

 

What D o Re al ThugsThinko f The W i re? - t yn
htt p:/ /fr eako n om ic s.b lo g s.n y ti mes . com /2008/01 /0 9/ what- do-r e a l - thug s-t hink -of-t he-wire/

=== === 
whi m syFulllistof l in ks to  the s tory. 
1: [http://frea kono mics.blog s.n yt ime s. com/2 0 08/01/ 09/ wha t-do-
r ea...]( h ttp :/ / f r ea konomics.blogs.nyt im e s .c om/2008/ 01/09/ w ha t- d o-real-t hu gs- 
thi n k -of-t he-w i re /)

2: [ http:/ / fr ea konomic s. blogs. ny tim es. com/2 0 08/0 1/18/w hat-do-rea.. . ](http://freak o nomics.blogs. n yt i m es . com/ 200 8/01/18/wha t-do - real -thu g s- 
th i nk-of -the- wi r e- p art-two/)

3: [http :/ /freak onomi cs.blogs.nyti mes.com/20 0 8 / 01/25/wh at-d o -r ea...](http:// freak onomics.bl o gs.nytim es.co m/2008/0 1/25/what - d o-real-t hug s-thi nk- o f -t he-wire-part- t h ree/ )
4: [ht tp: //freak ono mic s.b log s. nytimes.c om/2008/ 01 /3 1/ wh at- do-
r e a...](ht tp :// fr eak onomi c s.blog s.nyt imes .c om / 200 8/01/31 / wh a t -do- re al -thu gs- 
t hink- of-t h e-w ire-par t-four/)
5: [htt p: // freakon omics.blogs.n yt imes.com/2 00 8/0 2/07/w h a t-do-
re a...](http://freakonomi c s.blogs .ny times .com /2008
 Try_a simpler
explanation:_Hillary was a shit_candidate who_many_distrust, and_she_worked
very hard to_get that reputation.

~~~
vostok
>_Try a simpler explanation:_Hillary was a_shit_candidate who many distrust,
> and she worked very hard to get that reputation.

It seems_to_me that_many_people_who are not Clinton worked_very hard at
manufacturing this reputation.

------
itakedrugs
Is_it possible_to know if they target democrats?

 

What Do_Real_Thugs Think of_The Wire? - tyn
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-think-of-the-wire/

======
whimsy
Full list of links to the_story.

1: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire/)

2: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-two/)

3: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-three/)

4: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/what-do-real-thugs-
think-of-the-wire-part-four/)

5: [http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/what-do-
rea...](http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008