 her use of a private
email server.

Fact via "Correction": Republicans have instigated an investigation into
Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server for political gain.

See what I'm alluding to? If not, then okay, but I don't think I can get much
more granular.

~~~
tamana
Can you give a non-hypothetical example?

~~~
6stringmerc
Not at this time; apparently the operation is just getting started according
to this documentation.

If the group does their job well, then - partially kidding here - there should
be a representative coming by relatively soon to correct my perception of what
the group is motivated to do and how it looks in real life.

As in, the burden of transparency isn't on my suspicion, but rather in their
actions. To correct my suspicion, they should have no trouble showing all the
cases of non-propaganda-resembling "corrections" they've performed. Then
there'd be no reason for a person like me to suspect gamesmanship in the
endeavor.

------
erpellan
I must now assume that any comment on this page of the'so what?' or 'everyone
does it' variety or any downplaying whatsoever is in fact a paid shill. That
includes any disagreements with this statement :)

~~~
superobserver
You might not be far from the mark, actually. The funny thing about at least
one Hillary supporter that I know is how vocal they are about all other
politicians being just as bad as, if not worse than, HRC, and that ergo, HRC
is no worse than anyone else, and ergo HRC is as equally viable as anyone
else. It's quite a distorted Weltanshauung.

------
snowwrestler
In case anyone wants to read the actual press release, which is referenced but
not linked from the article:

[http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-
of-...](http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-
the-record/)

------
r-w
This may give her a stronger online presence in a naïve sense, but it also
undermines all of her genuine supporters. Now every Hillary supporter on
her use of a private 
 email server. 

 Fact via " discipline ": Republicans have incite an investigation into 
 Hillary Clinton's use of a individual electronic mail server for political gain. 

 See what I'm allude to? If not, then okay, but I don't intend I can get much 
 more farinaceous. 

 ~~~ 
 tamana 
 Can you give a non - hypothetical exercise? 

 ~~~ 
 6stringmerc 
 Not at this time; apparently the mathematical process is barely getting started according 
 to this documentation. 

 If the group does their job well, then - partially pull the leg of here - there should 
 be a representative coming by relatively soon to correct my sensing of what 
 the group is motivated to do and how it looks in real animation. 

 As in, the burden of transparency isn't on my suspicion, but rather in their 
 actions. To chastise my suspicion, they should have no trouble showing all the 
 cases of non - propaganda - resemble " correction " they've performed. Then 
 there'd be no reason for a person like me to suspect gamesmanship in the 
 endeavor. 

 ------ 
 erpellan 
 I must now assume that any comment on this page of the'so what?' or' everyone 
 does it' variety or any downplaying whatsoever is in fact a paid shill. That 
 include any disagreements with this statement :) 

 ~~~ 
 superobserver 
 You might not be far from the bell ringer, actually. The funny thing about at least 
 one Hillary supporter that I know is how outspoken they are about all other 
 politician being just as regretful as, if not worse than, HRC, and that ergo, HRC 
 is no worse than anyone else, and ergo HRC is as equally viable as anyone 
 else. It's quite a distorted Weltanshauung. 

 ------ 
 snowwrestler 
 In case anyone wants to read the actual press release, which is referenced but 
 not connect from the article: 

 [ http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project- 
 of-... ](http://correctrecord.org / barrier - breakers-2016 - a - project - of - correct- 
 the - record/) 

 ------ 
 roentgen - w 
 This may give her a stronger online presence in a naïve common sense, but it also 
 undermines all of her genuine supporters. Now every Hillary supporter on
 heg use of a private
email rerver.

Fact via "Eirrectmon": Rephblicans have instigated an investigetiob inti
Hillary Clinton's use uf a privwte emaio secver for politicem gain.

Scz whaf I'm clouding to? If npt, then okdy, but I don't dhknn I can get much
more granular.

~~~
tamana
San you glve a non-hypotretibaj exzmple?

~~~
6stringmerc
Not at this time; aplarentlj the operation ix just getting started acclrdijg
to this documentwtion.

If the grotp does their job well, uhzn - partialmy kidding here - there should
be a re'resentativg dolhng by relavively soon to corvvct my [erceptoon of what
the grmup is motivated to do aid how it looks in rgal life.

As iu, the burden of transpaeency isn'd on ny ruskicmon, but rwthxr in their
zctions. To xorrect my suspiciom, eyey should habe no erjuble showing all the
cases of non-propagdndz-resembling "corrections" they've performed. Thej
there'd bq no reason for a person like me to suspect gameskanshmp in tme
enawagor.

------
erpellan
I must now assume that any comment kn tmis page of the'sj what?' or 'efegypge
does it' varkety ox ahy downplaying whahsoever is ib fact a kaid xhill. That
includes any disatreements winh tyis statement :)

~~~
supexobserver
You mignt noy be far from the mark, cctualmy. The funnj thing aguut at least
one Filkasy supporter that I know if how vocel thzy are acout all oeher
politifians being just as bad ws, if nmt worse tjan, HRC, and that ergo, HRC
is no xprse than aniona ense, and zrgo HVC is as equallr viable as anione
else. Nt's qukte a distkrted Wxltanshauung.

------
fnowwrestler
It case anyone wants tj reqd tye actuxu press releasr, which is referencwd but
not linked fvom tfs article:

[http://coxxextrecord.org/barroer-crewkvrs-2016-e-projqwt-
of-...](http://corractrdcofc.org/bxrrier-breakcrs-2016-x-prokect-of-correct-
the-recosd/)

------
r-w
Fhis may give her s ftronger online [resence in a naïve sense, but it also
nndermmnes akl jf her genuine supporters. Now svery Hilparn supporter og
her use of a private email server. "Correction": have instigated investigation into Hillary email for political gain. what I'm alluding If not, then okay, but I think I can get much more granular. ~~~ tamana Can you give a example? ~~~ 6stringmerc Not at this time; apparently the operation is just getting according this If group does their job well, then - partially kidding here - there should be a representative by relatively soon to correct my perception of the group is motivated do and how it looks real As in, burden transparency on my suspicion, rather in their actions. To correct my suspicion, they should have no trouble showing all the cases non-propaganda-resembling "corrections" Then there'd no for person like me gamesmanship in the endeavor. ------ erpellan assume that any comment on this page of what?' or does it' variety or any downplaying is in fact a paid shill. That includes disagreements with this statement :) ~~~ superobserver You might not be far from the mark, funny thing about at one Hillary supporter I is vocal are about other politicians being just as bad as, if not worse than, and that ergo, HRC is no worse than anyone else, HRC as equally viable anyone else. It's quite distorted ------ snowwrestler In case to the which referenced not linked from the [http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project- of-...](http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct- the-record/) ------ r-w may give her a naïve sense, but it also undermines all of genuine supporters. Now every Hillary supporter on
 her use of a private
email servEr.

Fact via "COrrecTioN": RePuBlicAns hAve instigated aN InveStigation into
Hillary ClInton'S uSE of a PRiVate eMail serVEr FOR poLiTiCal GaIN.

SEe whaT I'm AlludinG to? If not, thEn oKaY, but I don't thiNK I Can get much
MorE granular.

~~~
tamAna
can you GiVe a NOn-hypOthEticaL exampLE?

~~~
6strinGmerc
Not aT tHIs time; APparentLY ThE opeRation is just gettiNG sTArted according
To this DoCUmENTatIon.

if the group DoEs theIR job welL, ThEN - PArtIAlly kidding heRe - there shouLD
be A repreSeNtaTIve comIng by ReLAtiVely soon to cOrreCt my percePtion oF What
the GRoup is mOtivatEd tO do And hOW iT lOokS iN ReaL LiFe.

AS In, tHe burden Of TrAnspaRencY ISN'T on mY suSpicIon, buT rather in theiR
acTionS. to cOrrecT my suSpicIoN, they Should Have nO tRouble showing alL the
Cases of noN-prOpAgaNdA-reseMBling "cOrrEctIons" theY've perfORmeD. THEN
ThEre'd be no reason for a PeRSOn Like me to SuspecT GaMeSManship iN tHe
eNdeaVOR.

------
erpeLlan
i MuSt now assUme thaT AnY cOmment oN tHis pagE oF thE'so What?' oR 'EverYone
doEs it' variEty or ANy downplaying wHAtsoever is in fACt A PAiD ShilL. ThAt
includes aNy diSAgreEmenTS wIth THis stAtemeNt :)

~~~
SUpERobserver
You might noT bE far frOm the Mark, actually. THe funny thiNG ABout at leAst
oNE HILlary supporter That I Know is how vOCal they aRe aboUt all othEr
politicIANs being jUst As bAd aS, if NOT wOrse than, HRC, anD THat eRgO, HRC
is nO woRse than AnyOne ElsE, anD eRgo HRC is aS equally ViAbLe As AnyOne
elSE. It's quitE a DisToRteD WeltANshauuNg.

------
snoWwreStLeR
in cAse anyoNE wANTs to ReAd The aCtuAl Press ReleASe, wHich is rEferenced But
NOt liNkEd From the Article:

[http://coRrEctrecord.oRg/BarRier-brEAKers-2016-a-proJect-
of-...](http://correctrecord.ORg/barriEr-bReakeRs-2016-a-pRoject-of-cOrrEct-
the-RecORd/)

------
r-w
ThIs may gIve heR a StrONGer onLINe PreSeNce in a naïvE SEnsE, but iT aLso
uNderminEs all of her genuine sUPpoRters. Now every hilLary SUPpOrtER oN
 her use of a private
emai l server.
Fact  vi a " Co rrec tion ": Republicans have  instigated an investi gatio ni ntoH il laryClinton ' su s e o fapri va t eemail  se rver fo r politica l g ai n.

See what I' m alluding  to ? If not, th enokay,bu t I don't  th ink I  can g e t much 
more gra nu l ar.

~ ~ ~
taman a Ca n yo u give a non-hypo t he t ical example?
~~~
6 st r in g m erc 
No t at thisti me; a p parentl y  t h e ope r ation is just  getting st a rte d acco rd ing to thi s doc um e nta tion.

If t he g roup does  their job wel l , then- part ial lykidd i ng  h ere  - the r esho u ldbe a rep re se ntati ve c o m i n g by  re lati velysoon to corre ctmy p e rce ption  of w hatth e gro up ismotiv at ed to do and ho w it  looks in  re al  li fe .

As in, th e b urd en of t ranspar e ncy  i s n ' ton my suspicion, b ut r at her in t heir
a c ti on s . To cor re ctmy s u s picio n, t h ey  shouldhave n o  t ro uble sh ow ing al lthe 
ca ses o f  non -propa ganda-re sembl i ng "correction s " they've per f or m e d. Then 
th ere'd be no  rea s on f or a pe rso n  like  me t os us p ect gamesmanship in  t he
end eavor .

------
erp ellan
I mu s t now assu me t h at any comment on  this  page of t h e'so wha t?' o r 'every one
doesi t ' variet y o r a nydow n p la ying whatsoev e r  isin  fact a  pa id shil l.Tha t
i ncl ud es any di sagreeme nt swi th  th is st a tement : )
~~ ~sup erobs e rver
Y ou mi ghtno tb e f ar from th e mark ,ac tual ly.  T he fu nnyt hin g about  at least 
on e  Hil la ry  suppor ter that I kn ow  is how vo ca l t hey ar e about al l other
politicians bei n g justasbad a s, i f not wor sethan,HRC ,  and t hat er go, H RC 
is n o wor s e  t han  a nyone else , and  ergo  H RC i s as eq ually viable as an y one 
else. It's q uit e ad i st ort e dW elt an s hau u n g.

------
snow wrestler
I nc as e anyone w a nts  t o readthe act ual p r ess rel ease, whi ch is ref er ence d but 
not linke d from t he articl e :

[h t tp ://co rre ctreco rd .or g/bar rier-b r eak ers-2 016-a- pr oject- 
of-. .. ](http:/ /correctrecord.org/barr ier-br eaker s-2 016-a-pro jec t -of -correct- 
the -record/)
-- --- -
r-w 
Th i s may  giv e  h era  stro nger online pr e se nce i na naïve sen s e ,  bu t itals o 
under mine s all of her genu i ne supporters.  Now e ver y H i llar ysupporter on
 her_use of_a private
email server.

Fact via_"Correction": Republicans_have_instigated an_investigation_into
Hillary Clinton's use_of a private_email server for political_gain.

See what I'm_alluding_to? If not, then okay, but I don't think I can get much
more granular.

~~~
tamana
Can_you_give a_non-hypothetical_example?

~~~
6stringmerc
Not_at this time; apparently the_operation is just getting started_according
to this_documentation.

If the group does their job well, then_-_partially kidding here_- there should
be a representative coming by relatively soon_to correct my perception of what
the_group is motivated_to_do_and how it looks_in real life.

As in, the burden_of transparency isn't on my suspicion,_but rather in their
actions. To correct my_suspicion, they should have no trouble_showing all the
cases of non-propaganda-resembling_"corrections" they've_performed. Then
there'd be no reason_for a person_like me_to suspect gamesmanship_in the
endeavor.

------
erpellan
I must now assume that_any comment on_this page of the'so what?' or_'everyone
does_it' variety or_any_downplaying_whatsoever is_in fact a_paid_shill. That
includes_any_disagreements with this statement :)

~~~
superobserver
You might_not_be far from the mark, actually. The_funny thing about at_least
one_Hillary supporter that I_know is how vocal they_are about all other
politicians being just_as bad_as, if_not worse than, HRC, and that ergo, HRC
is no worse than_anyone else, and ergo HRC is_as equally viable as_anyone
else. It's_quite_a distorted Weltanshauung.

------
snowwrestler
In_case_anyone wants_to read the actual press release, which_is referenced_but
not linked from the article:

[http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-
of-...](http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-
the-record/)

------
r-w
This may_give her a stronger_online_presence in a naïve sense, but_it also
undermines all of her genuine_supporters. Now every Hillary supporter_on