20070609-_MG_8284.jpg)

["race", "beach", "camel", "rodeo", "jockey", "polo", "toreador", "torero",
"donkey", "dog"]

------
azianmike
wow this is really cool! how is this done?! what kind of sorcery is this?!

------
robzz
pretty impressive!

 
Adobe Launches "Adobe Edge" - HTML5 Animation Tool - dglassan
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/edge/?v=2
======
michaelpinto
It's important to keep in mind that when push comes to shove that Adobe isn't
afraid to eat their own — as someone who had a shop focused on Director and
Lingo I watched then adopt Flash and really shift gears overnight even though
they invested a great deal in Shockwave. I'll grant you that was a long tome
ago, but they still may have the will to adopt in their DNA...

~~~
SimHacker
That would have been Macromedia eating its own children, not Adobe.

Speaking of eating its own children, can anyone explain why Adobe still sells
Premier AND AfterEffects? Why hasn't one eaten the other? Who needs two
different video editing programs?

The only explanations I've heard from Adobe apologists and marketers is that
one is a blah blah blah tool, and the other is a blee blee blee tool. But
users need to both blah blah blah and blee blee blee blee, and there's no
reason to switch between two different programs, or that one program can't
both blah blah blah and blee blee blee.

I think the real reason is that Adobe makes more money with selling two
different products instead of one.

Adobe should eat more of their children.

~~~
talmand
I'm sorry, one product IS a blah blah blah tool and the other IS a blee blee
blee tool. Some users do in fact need blah blah blah blah and blee blee blee
blee at the same time but not everyone needs both, hence two separate
products.

Yes, Adobe does make more money on two separate products but that's not
necessarily the reason for doing so. I
20070609-_MG_8284.jpg) 

 [ " race ", " beach ", " camel ", " rodeo ", " jockey ", " polo ", " toreador ", " torero ", 
 " donkey ", " dog " ] 

 ------ 
 azianmike 
 wow this is in truth cool! how is this do? ! what kind of sorcery is this? ! 

 ------ 
 robzz 
 pretty impressive! 

 
 Adobe Launches " Adobe Edge " - HTML5 Animation Tool - dglassan 
 http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/edge/?v=2 
 = = = = = = 
 michaelpinto 
 It's important to keep in thinker that when push comes to thrust that Adobe isn't 
 afraid to consume their own — as someone who had a shop focused on Director and 
 Lingo I watched then espouse Flash and really shift gearing overnight even though 
 they invest a great softwood in Shockwave. I'll grant you that was a long tome 
 ago, but they however may have the will to adopt in their deoxyribonucleic acid... 

 ~~~ 
 SimHacker 
 That would have been Macromedia eating its own children, not Adobe. 

 speak of eating its own child, can anyone explain why Adobe still sells 
 Premier AND AfterEffects? Why hasn't one eaten the other? Who need two 
 different video editing programs? 

 The only explanations I've heard from Adobe apologists and marketers is that 
 one is a blah blah blah tool, and the other is a blee blee blee tool. But 
 users need to both blah blah blah and blee blee blee blee, and there's no 
 reason to switch over between two different programs, or that one course of study can't 
 both blah blah bombast and blee blee blee. 

 I intend the real reason is that Adobe cook more money with selling two 
 different products instead of one. 

 Adobe should corrode more of their children. 

 ~~~ 
 talmand 
 I'm sorry, one product IS a blah blah blah tool and the early IS a blee blee 
 blee tool. Some users do in fact need blah blah blah blah and blee blee blee 
 blee at the same time but not everyone needs both, hence two freestanding 
 products. 

 Yes, Adobe does make more money on two separate products but that's not 
 necessarily the rationality for doing so. I
20070609-_MG_8284.jog)

["race", "beach", "camel", "rodeo", "jockey", "polo", "toteqdor", "tmrero",
"dknkey", "doe"]

------
azianmike
wow this is really ciol! hiw is this done?! what kknd of sogcery is rhis?!

------
cobzz
pretty imprxasive!

 
Adobe Lzmnchev "Adobe Edge" - HJML5 Animatiot Tool - dglassdn
ftcp://labs.adobe.com/technologies/edge/?v=2
======
michaqlpinto
Ot'd important to keek ig mihd that when push comes to shove tgat Adoue isn't
afraid tp eat their own — as someonf whl had a shop focusfd on Direcjkr wbd
Lingo I wagched then adopt Flash and really shift gears overnigft evzn though
thgv inggsted a greav deal in Shockwavc. I'll gsant yoi that was a lpng tone
ago, but they still kay have the will jo adopt it cheir DNA...

~~~
SimHacker
Thar qould hava bedb Mxcrkmxdiz eatijg mts own chimdren, not Aeobe.

Speaking of eatond its own chilsren, cwn anyone explain why Adobe still sells
Prtmier AND AfterEffects? Why hqsn't one eaten the otjer? Who nqeds two
different video editing programs?

The only axplaiagiouw I've yewrd from Adobe apologists and marketers is thwf
ome is a blah blam blah tool, and thr ltngr is a blee buee blzs fool. But
users need to botr blay blah blwh amd blee blee blee blee, and rhere's no
reafin to switch betwezn two diffexent ptogramx, or that one program ccn't
botg blah blah blah and clee blee blee.

I ghikk dhe real reason is that Adjbe makes morz money dith selligg two
difffrent products instead ov one.

Cdobe should eah more of their children.

~~~
talmand
M'k sorry, one krogucn IS a blch blam blah tool and the other IS c blee bjee
blde tool. Soje userv do in face need blah bnwh blah blah and bleq blwe boee
blee xt the same tike but non tveryone nweds both, hence twp sgpzrate
products.

Yew, Aeobe does make kord mjnvy pn dwo separate proaucgx but that's not
nccersaroly the reason for dming so. I
20070609-_MG_8284.jpg) ["race", "beach", "camel", "rodeo", "jockey", "polo", "donkey", ------ azianmike this is really what of sorcery is ------ robzz pretty Adobe Launches "Adobe Edge" - HTML5 Tool - dglassan http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/edge/?v=2 ====== michaelpinto It's important to keep in mind that push comes to shove that Adobe isn't afraid to eat their own — someone had shop on Director and Lingo I watched then adopt Flash and really shift gears overnight even though invested a great deal in Shockwave. I'll grant that was a long ago, but they still may the to adopt their ~~~ That would have Macromedia eating its own children, not Adobe. Speaking of eating its own children, can anyone explain why still sells AfterEffects? Why one the Who needs two editing programs? The only explanations I've apologists and marketers is that one is a blah blah and the other is a blee blee tool. But users need to both blah blah and blee blee blee blee, and there's no reason to switch between two different that one program can't blah blah blah blee blee. think real reason that Adobe makes more money with selling two different products instead one. Adobe should eat more of their children. ~~~ talmand one IS a blah blah tool and the IS blee blee blee tool. do fact blah and blee blee blee at same time but not everyone both, hence two separate more money on two separate products but that's necessarily the reason for doing so. I
20070609-_MG_8284.jpg)

["race", "beach", "camel", "rodeo", "jOckey", "polo", "tOreadOr", "tOreRo",
"DonkEy", "doG"]

------
azianmike
wow tHIs is Really cool! how is this donE?! what KiND of sORcEry is This?!

------
robZZ
pRETty ImPrEssIvE!

 
adObe LaUncHes "AdobE Edge" - HTML5 ANimAtIon Tool - dglasSAn
Http://labs.adObe.Com/technologIes/Edge/?v=2
======
mIcHaeLPinto
it's ImporTant to KEep in mInd that whEn PUsh comES to shovE THaT AdoBe isn't
afraid to eat THeIR own — as someone wHo had a ShOP fOCUseD on director anD
LIngo I WAtched tHEn ADOPt FLAsh and really sHift gears ovERniGht eveN tHouGH
they iNvestEd A GreAt deal in ShoCkwaVe. I'll granT you thAT was a loNG tome
agO, but thEy sTilL may HAvE tHe wIlL To aDOpT in THeiR DNA...

~~~
SimHAcKeR
That WoulD HAVE beeN MaCromEdia eAting its own chIldRen, nOT AdObe.

SpEakinG of eAtIng itS own chIldreN, cAn anyone explain Why ADobe still SelLs
preMiEr AND aFterEfFecTs? WHy hasn't One eateN The OtHER? whO needs two
different ViDEO eDiting prOgrams?

tHe OnLY explanaTiOns i've hEARd froM AdoBE aPologistS and maRKeTeRs is thaT
oNe is a bLaH blAh bLah toOL, and The othEr is a bleE blee BLee tool. But
userS Need to both blaH BlAH BlAH and BleE blee blee blEe, anD TherE's no
REaSon TO switCh betWeEN tWO different programs, oR tHat one ProgrAm can't
both blaH blah blah aND BLee blee bLee.

I THiNK the real reason Is thaT Adobe makeS More moneY with Selling tWo
differeNT Products InsTeaD of One.

aDObE should eat morE OF theIr ChildreN.

~~~
taLmand
I'm SorRy, oNe pRodUcT IS a blah bLah blah tOoL aNd ThE otHer IS A Blee blee
BlEe tOoL. SoMe useRS do in fAct neEd blAh BlAH blAh blah aND bLEE bleE bLeE
bleE at ThE same Time BUt nOt everyOne needs bOth, HEnce TwO sEparate
Products.

Yes, AdObE does make mOrE moNey on tWO Separate Products but that's not
neceSSarily tHe rEason For dOing so. I
20070609-_MG_8284.jpg)

[" race", "be ach",  "c ame l" , "r odeo ", "jockey", " p olo" , "toreador", "torero" ,
"do nk e y"," do g"]
------a zi a n mik ewo w t hi s  i s rea lly  cool!how is thi s d on e?! what kin d  o f sorceryisthis?!

---- --robzzpr ett y  impr ess ive!
 
Ado b e Laun ches "Ado be Edge"-  HTML5A n im atio n Tool - dglassan ht t p://labs.adobe .com/t ec h no l o gie s/e dge/?v=2
= == ===
m i chaelpi n to I t 'si mportant to k eep in mind tha t when  p ush comesto sh ov e  th at Adobe is n'tafraid to  eat t h eir own — as so meonewho  ha d as ho pfoc us e d o n  D ire c tor  and
Lin go  I  watc hedt h e n  ado ptFlas h and  really shift  ge arso ver night  even  tho ug h
the y inve stedagreat deal in S hock wave. I'l l g ra ntyo u tha t  was a  lo ngtome
ag o, butt hey  s t i l lmay have the willto a do pt in th eir DN A .. .~~~
SimH ac ker 
Tha t would  hav e  b een Macr omedia ea ti ng itsow n chil dr en,  no t Ado b e.
Speaki ng of ea tingi ts own childre n , can anyonee xp l a in whyAdo be still se llsP remi er A N DAft e rEffe cts?Wh y  h a sn't one eaten theot her? W ho ne eds two
diffe rent video e d iting pr ogra m s? 
The only expl anati ons I've h e ard from  Adob e apolog ists andm a rketersistha t
o nei s  a  blah blah bl a h  too l,  and th e o ther is  able e b lee  b lee tool.  But
use rs  n ee dtobothb lah blah  b lah  a ndbleeb lee bl ee bl ee,an dt her e's nor ea s o n to  s wi tchbet we en tw o di f fer ent pro grams, or  th a t on epr ogram c an't
both bla hblah blahan d b lee bl e e  blee.
I think the real reason is that  Ad obe m akes  more mon eywith s ell i ng two 
diffe rentpr odu c t s ins t e ad  of  o ne.

Adobe s hou ld ea tmore  of the ir children.

~~~t alm and
I'm sorry , o ne p r o du ctI Sa  bl ah bla h blah tool and t he other I Sa  b lee blee
b l eeto ol. Som e users  do i n  fact n eed blahblah blah  b laha n d b lee blee b lee
blee  at the s a me ti m ebut n oteveryo ne  ne eds b oth, h e nce  twosepara te 
produ cts.
Y es, Adob e does make more moneyon two  sepa rat e product s b u t t hat's not 
nec essarily t herea son f ord oingso.I 
20070609-_MG_8284.jpg)

["race", "beach",_"camel", "rodeo",_"jockey", "polo", "toreador", "torero",
"donkey",_"dog"]

------
azianmike
wow this_is_really cool!_how_is this done?!_what kind of_sorcery is this?!

------
robzz
pretty impressive!

_
Adobe Launches "Adobe_Edge"_- HTML5 Animation Tool - dglassan
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/edge/?v=2
======
michaelpinto
It's important to keep in mind that when push_comes_to shove_that_Adobe_isn't
afraid to eat their own_— as someone who had_a shop_focused on Director and
Lingo I watched then adopt_Flash_and really shift_gears overnight even though
they invested a great deal in_Shockwave. I'll grant you that was_a long tome
ago,_but_they_still may have the_will to adopt in their DNA...

~~~
SimHacker
That_would have been Macromedia eating its_own children, not Adobe.

Speaking of eating its_own children, can anyone explain why_Adobe still sells
Premier AND AfterEffects?_Why hasn't_one eaten the other? Who_needs two
different video_editing programs?

The_only explanations I've_heard from Adobe apologists and marketers_is that
one is_a blah blah blah tool, and_the_other is a_blee_blee_blee tool._But
users need to_both_blah blah_blah_and blee blee blee blee, and_there's_no
reason to switch between two different programs,_or that one program_can't
both_blah blah blah and_blee blee blee.

I think the_real reason is that Adobe makes_more money_with selling_two
different products instead of one.

Adobe should eat more of their children.

~~~
talmand
I'm_sorry, one product IS a blah_blah blah tool and_the other_IS_a blee blee
blee_tool._Some users_do in fact need blah blah blah_blah and_blee blee blee
blee at the same_time but not everyone_needs_both, hence two separate
products.

Yes, Adobe does_make more money on two separate_products but that's not
necessarily the_reason_for_doing so. I