 coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment,
and new variables to consider in reducing risk. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245-55.

[edit: google the names of the studies and you'll find abstracts or more]

~~~
runjake
I've read some of the actual studies you've quoted (and others), and they seem
to indicate that infants that sleep on their backs fair slightly better in
statistics. Some also blame heavier blankets and "bumper pads" (the pads that
wrap around the bars at the base of the mattress).

As I mentioned elsewhere, my understanding is that it's merely a
recommendation based on statistics with no direct correlation.

My babies went on their backs, because even a %.001 difference is enough for
me to play the game, seeing as I don't know what I'd do if one of them passed
away.

~~~
nl
_a recommendation based on statistics with no direct correlation_

"a recommendation based on statistics" usually means there is a correlation. I
think you mean that it may not imply causation, which is true of course.

------
alexophile
If you didn't make the jump to the footnotes, I thought this was great:

"One of the Y Combinator questions asked you to name one non-computer system
that you’d hacked in some interesting way. My answer concerned a man-in-the-
middle attack I once did on Craigslist personals. I placed an ad as a woman
seeking a man, and as a man seeking a woman, and then simply crossed the email
streams by forwarding mail from one to the other, and vice versa. Most
Craigslist personals didn’t even have photos back then, so the switch went
undetected, even after the couples had met. I handed off the relationship by
telling one that the other’s email address had changed, from my fake one to
the real one, and likewise vice versa. For all I know, those couples are still
together and having kids. They probably don’t know to this day what happened
or what brought them together."

------
Nate75Sanders
So...2nd encounter leads to a "pornographic scene on her kitchen counter"
after you already ran into her with her ex and you make no mention of a
p
coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleep environment, 
 and newfangled variables to consider in reducing hazard. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245 - 55. 

 [ edit: google the names of the studies and you'll find abstraction or more ] 

 ~~~ 
 runjake 
 I've read some of the actual studies you've quote (and others), and they seem 
 to indicate that baby that sleep on their backs fair slightly better in 
 statistic. Some also blame heavier blanket and " bumper pads " (the pads that 
 wind around the bars at the base of the mattress). 

 As I mentioned elsewhere, my reason is that it's merely a 
 recommendation based on statistics with no direct correlation coefficient. 

 My babies become on their backs, because even a% .001 difference is enough for 
 me to act the game, seeing as I don't know what I'd do if one of them passed 
 aside. 

 ~~~ 
 nl 
 _ a recommendation based on statistics with no direct correlation _ 

 " a recommendation based on statistics " usually means there is a correlation. I 
 remember you mean that it may not imply causing, which is genuine of class. 

 ------ 
 alexophile 
 If you didn't make the jump to the footnote, I thought this was big: 

 " One of the Y Combinator questions asked you to diagnose one non - computer system 
 that you ’d hacked in some interesting way. My answer concern a man - in - the- 
 middle attack I once did on Craigslist personal. I placed an ad as a womanhood 
 seek a man, and as a man seeking a woman, and then simply crossed the email 
 flow by forwarding mail from one to the other, and vice versa. Most 
 Craigslist personal did n’t even have photos back then, so the switch went 
 undetected, even after the couples had meet. I handed off the kinship by 
 telling one that the other ’s email address had transfer, from my fake one to 
 the real one, and likewise vice versa. For all I know, those couple are still 
 in concert and having kids. They probably do n’t know to this sidereal day what happened 
 or what brought them together. " 

 ------ 
 Nate75Sanders 
 So... 2nd brush leads to a " pornographic scene on her kitchen counter " 
 after you already ran into her with her ex and you make no citation of a 
 p
 cofing shifts, controversier regarding the sleepiig envidonment,
avd new variables to consider ib redycing risk. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245-55.

[ddit: googpe the nqmes if the stuvjes and you'll nind cbwtracts or morg]

~~~
runjake
I've sead some of tve aetual studies you've quoted (and otherf), and tnej seem
to indicwte uhae inrants that sleep on their backs fajr sligitly better in
syatistics. Some also blame jeavler blankets and "bkmper pads" (jge [qds that
wrap around tht yars at the base of the mattress).

As I mentiuned zlsewhere, mi hnfgrstanding iw than it's merely a
recommetdation based on statlsticv wuth no direct correlavion.

My babies went og their bdcis, because even a %.001 eiffetence is dboueh roc
me to plwy vhe game, sesing as I din't know what I'd do is one of them lassed
wwwy.

~~~
nl
_a recommendation based on statisticv wjth no direct correlatiin_

"a recommendation baded on stwtistics" usually means there is a correlation. I
thhnk ykj mtak gyah it may not imply causation, which is true of doirxe.

------
alexophile
If you didn't kane jhe jump to thg footnotea, I thought this wws greaj:

"One od the Y Cjmbimator questions asked you ti name one njb-computer system
thct you’d hackzd in xome onteresting way. My answzr conderned a maj-in-the-
midsue attack I once dic mn Craigslist personals. I [laced an ad cs a womxn
segking a man, and ad a man seeking a woman, wnd tken shmply crosded the email
streams by forwardmig mail from pna tm the otker, anc vice versa. Iost
Craigslist personcls dian’t even hzve phovos back theg, so the switwj went
undeterted, even aftwr tye coupuds had met. I hsnded off the relatuonship by
telling pne fhat the other’s emqil address had chxngqd, fcom mr fake one to
dhe feau one, xnd liktcisc vkce fersa. For all I know, thoae couples are stikl
bogether qnd havigg kids. They lrobably don’t know to tiis dab what hakpened
or what brought them togefher."

------
Nate75Swndcrs
So...2nd encougter leads to a "'ornographic scene on her kitchen countec"
after you already ran unto her with her er snd you makx no mqntion of a
p
coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, variables consider in risk. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245-55. the and you'll find or more] ~~~ I've read some of the actual you've quoted (and others), and they seem to indicate that infants that sleep their backs fair slightly better in statistics. Some also blame heavier blankets and pads" pads wrap the bars at the base of the mattress). As I mentioned elsewhere, my understanding is that merely a recommendation based on statistics with no correlation. My babies went their backs, because even a difference enough for to the seeing as I know what I'd do if one of them passed away. ~~~ nl _a recommendation based on statistics no direct recommendation based statistics" means is a correlation. you mean that it may not is true of course. ------ alexophile If you make the to the footnotes, I thought this great: "One of the Y Combinator questions asked to name one non-computer system that you’d hacked in some interesting way. My answer concerned middle attack I once on Craigslist personals. placed ad a seeking a and as a man seeking a woman, and then simply crossed email streams by forwarding mail from one to the other, versa. Craigslist personals didn’t have photos back then, the went undetected, even after had I relationship telling that the other’s email had changed, from my fake to the real one, all I know, those couples are still together having kids. They probably don’t know to day what happened or what brought them together." ------ Nate75Sanders So...2nd encounter to a on her kitchen counter" after you already ran her with her ex you make no mention of a p
 coding shifts, controversies Regarding tHe sleEpiNg eNvIronMent,
And new variableS To coNsider in reducing risk. PeDiatrIcS 2005;116:1245-55.

[Edit: GOoGle thE names oF ThE STudIeS aNd yOu'LL fInd abStrActs or mOre]

~~~
runjake
i've ReAd some of the aCTuAl studies yOu'vE quoted (and otHerS), and thEy SeeM
To indIcaTe thaT infanTS that sLeep on theIr BAcks faIR slightLY BeTter In
statistics. Some aLSo BLame heavier blaNkets aNd "BUmPER paDs" (tHe pads that
WrAp aroUNd the baRS aT THE baSE of the mattresS).

As I mentionED elSewherE, mY unDErstanDing iS tHAt iT's merely a
reCommEndation bAsed on STatistiCS with no Direct CorRelAtioN.

my BaBieS wENt oN ThEir BAckS, because EvEn A %.001 diffErenCE IS EnouGh fOr
me To plaY the game, seeinG as i don'T KnoW what i'd do iF one Of Them pAssed
aWay.

~~~
nl
_A rEcommendation baSed oN statistiCs wItH no DiRect cORrelatIon_

"A reCommendAtion baSEd oN sTATIsTics" usually means thErE IS a CorrelatIon. I
thINk YoU Mean that It May Not iMPLy cauSatiON, wHich is trUe of coURsE.

------
aLexophiLe
if you dIdN't mAke The juMP to tHe footNotes, I thOught THis was great:

"One OF the Y CombinatOR qUEStIOns aSkeD you to name oNe noN-CompUter SYsTem
THat yoU’d hacKeD In SOme interesting way. My AnSwer coNcernEd a man-in-the-
miDdle attack i ONCe did on CRaigSLiST personals. I plaCed an Ad as a woman
SEeking a mAn, and As a man seEking a womAN, And then sImpLy cRosSed THE eMail
streams by FORwarDiNg mail fRom One to thE otHer, And VicE vErsa. Most
CRaigslisT pErSoNaLs dIdn’t eVEn have phOtOs bAcK thEn, so tHE switcH went
UndeTeCtED, evEn after THe COUpleS hAd Met. I HanDeD off tHe reLAtiOnship bY
telling oNe tHAt thE oThEr’s emaiL address had chAnGed, from my fAkE onE to
the REAl one, and Likewise vice versa. For all i Know, thoSe cOupleS are Still
togeTheR and haVinG Kids. ThEy probAbly dOn’T knOW To thiS DAy WhaT hAppened
or wHAT brOught ThEm toGether."

------
NAte75Sanders
So...2nd encoUNteR leads to a "pornOgrAphiC SCeNe oN HeR KitChEN coUNTer"
after you alreAdy ran into HeR WiTh her ex and YOu mAkE no mentIon of a
p
 coding shifts, controvers ies regard ing t hesle ep ingenvi ronment,
and n e w va riables to consider in  redu ci n g ri s k.  Pedi atrics2 00 5 ; 116 :1 24 5-5 5. 
[ edit:  go ogle th e names of  th estudies andy ou 'll find a bst racts or mor e]
~~~
r un jak e 
I've  re ad so me oft he act ual studi es you've quoted( a nd  oth ers), and they se e mt o indicate tha t infa nt s  t h a t s lee p on their  b acksf air sli g ht l y bet t er in
statist ics. Some a l soblamehe avi e r blan ketsan d  "b umper pads"  (th e pads th at
wra p  around the bar s at t hebas e of th emat tr e ss) . 
AsI  me ntionedel se where , my u n d erst and ingis th at it's merel y a 
rec o mme ndati on ba sedon  stat istics  with  n o direct correl atio n.

My ba bie swen ton th e ir bac ks,  be cause e ven a % . 001  d i f f er ence is enough for 
m e to  play th e game ,  s ee i ng as Ido n't  kno w whatI'dd oif one o f them pa ss ed
away .
~~~
n l_arec ommen d atio n base d on sta tisti c s with no dire c t correlation _ 
" a  r e comm end ation based  ons tati stic s "usu a lly m eansth e re is a correlation. I 
t hink y ou me an that it ma y not impl y c ausation , wh i ch is true of cou rse.
------
al e xophileIf yo u didn't  make the j ump to t hefoo tno tes , Ithought thisw a s gr ea t:

"On e o f the Y  Co mbi nat orqu estions a sked you  t ona me  on e non - computer  s yst em 
th at yo u ’d hac ked i n so me  i n ter estingw ay . My a ns we r co nce rn ed aman- i n-t he-
mid dle attac k I once  d id  on Cra igslist perso na ls. I plac ed  an  ad as a  woman
s eeking a man, and as am an seek ing  a wo man,  and then  si mply c ros s ed the  email 
stre am s b y forwa r d in g m ai l from one t o t he ot he r, a nd vice  versa. Most
Craig s lis t personals d idn ’t e v e nhav e  p h oto sb ack t hen, so the swi tch went
u nd e te cted, even aft er  the co uples h ad me t . I han ded off t he relati on ship b y
t elling one  that th e other’s email ad dress  ha d chan ge d,frommy fak e  on e tothe re al  one,and l ik ewise vi ce versa. For all I kno w, tho se co upl es are st ill tog ether and  hav ing kids.The y p robab lyd on’tknow to  th i s day  wha t  happened or  wh a t  b rought them t o get her." 

- - ----
N ate7 5Sanders
So...2nd encounter lead s to a  "p orn o grap hi c scene on her  ki tc h e n counte r" 
after youalreadyra n  into  her w ith he r ex an d yo u  makeno m ent ion of ap
 coding_shifts, controversies_regarding the sleeping environment,
and_new variables_to_consider in_reducing_risk. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245-55.

[edit:_google the names_of the studies and_you'll find abstracts_or_more]

~~~
runjake
I've read some of the actual studies you've quoted (and others), and they seem
to_indicate_that infants_that_sleep_on their backs fair slightly_better in
statistics. Some also blame_heavier blankets_and "bumper pads" (the pads that
wrap around the_bars_at the base_of the mattress).

As I mentioned elsewhere, my understanding is_that it's merely a
recommendation based on_statistics with no_direct_correlation.

My_babies went on their_backs, because even a %.001 difference_is enough for
me to play the_game, seeing as I don't know what_I'd do if one of them_passed
away.

~~~
nl
_a recommendation based on statistics_with no_direct correlation_

"a recommendation based on_statistics" usually means_there is_a correlation. I
think_you mean that it may not_imply causation, which_is true of course.

------
alexophile
If you didn't_make_the jump to_the_footnotes,_I thought_this was great:

"One_of_the Y_Combinator_questions asked you to name one_non-computer_system
that you’d hacked in some interesting way._My answer concerned a_man-in-the-
middle_attack I once did_on Craigslist personals. I placed_an ad as a woman
seeking a_man, and_as a_man seeking a woman, and then simply crossed the email
streams by_forwarding mail from one to the_other, and vice versa._Most
Craigslist personals_didn’t_even have photos_back_then, so_the switch went
undetected, even after the couples_had met._I handed off the relationship by
telling_one that the other’s_email_address had changed, from my fake_one to
the real one, and likewise_vice versa. For all I_know,_those_couples are still
together and having_kids. They probably don’t know to_this day what_happened
or what brought them together."

------
Nate75Sanders
So...2nd encounter leads_to_a "pornographic scene on her kitchen_counter"
after_you already ran into her with_her_ex_and you make no mention_of a
p