 etc).

I wonder if this "Vice-President of the European Commission" has any idea that
her message will be read as "blah blah blah world cup blah blah go team! blah
blah blah".

I really hope Brazil loses this tournament, that the abuses in building the
stadiums are scrutinized further and a lot of government officials and
companies are punished for this ridiculous private event paid with people's
tax money. Yes, I'm a dreamer.

------
throwaway6637
So... aside from the hot air, the only concrete thing I got from that press
release was that the EU politicians are so pissed that the EU court struck
down their draconian data retention laws that they're going to pass a new one
that resolves the technicalities on which the old one was struck down.

And apparently, this is somehow going to bring the EU to "a gold standard in
privacy protection". What?

~~~
higherpurpose
> the only concrete thing I got from that press release was that the EU
> politicians are so pissed that the EU court struck down their draconian data
> retention laws that they're going to pass a new one that resolves the
> technicalities on which the old one was struck down.

Where did you read that? Are you confusing the "data protection" with "data
retention" terms? They sound similar but are opposite laws/movements.

~~~
throwaway6637
In the article.

"These are safeguards that were missing in the EU's Data Retention Directive.
As a result, the Directive has been invalidated by the Court of Justice of the
EU, Europe's highest court. The court said: the violation of individuals'
rights was of "vast scope and particular gravity". One thing is certain: it
will be have to be revised, with greater protection included for individuals."

So, we really need to protect privacy better, but we're still going to
preemptively wiretap everyone in case some of them turn out to be criminals.

------
TazeTSchnitzel
>On data privacy, like in football, we are playing in the same direction; to
score a goal and win the Championship for a gold standard in privacy
protection! A combined EU-Brazil team can be a winner.

Did that sound any better in
etc). 

 I wonder if this " Vice - President of the European Commission " has any idea that 
 her message will be read as " blah blah bombast world cup blah blah die team! blah 
 blah blah ". 

 I in truth hope Brazil lose this tournament, that the abuses in building the 
 stadium are scrutinized further and a lot of politics official and 
 companies are punish for this ridiculous private event paid with citizenry's 
 tax money. Yes, I'm a dreamer. 

 ------ 
 throwaway6637 
 So... aside from the hot air, the lone concrete thing I got from that press 
 passing was that the EU politicians are so pissed that the EU court assume 
 down their draconian data retention laws that they're going to pass a newfangled one 
 that resolves the technicalities on which the old one was struck down. 

 And apparently, this is somehow going to bring the EU to " a gold standard in 
 privacy protection ". What? 

 ~~~ 
 higherpurpose 
 > the only concrete thing I got from that press release was that the EU 
 > politicians are so annoyed that the EU court struck down their draconian datum 
 > memory police that they're going to pass a newfangled one that resolves the 
 > technicalities on which the old one was struck down. 

 Where did you understand that? Are you confusing the " data protection " with " data 
 retention " terms? They fathom similar but are opposite laws / movements. 

 ~~~ 
 throwaway6637 
 In the article. 

 " These are precaution that were missing in the EU's Data Retention Directive. 
 As a consequence, the Directive has been invalidated by the Court of Justice of the 
 EU, Europe's highest court. The court said: the irreverence of individuals' 
 rights was of " vast oscilloscope and particular gravity ". One thing is certain: it 
 will be consume to be revised, with greater protection included for individuals. " 

 thus, we really necessitate to protect privacy better, but we're even going to 
 preemptively wiretap everyone in case some of them turn out to be criminals. 

 ------ 
 TazeTSchnitzel 
 > On data privacy, like in football, we are play in the same direction; to 
 score a goal and win the Championship for a gold standard in privacy 
 protection! A combined EU - Brazil team can be a achiever. 

 Did that sound any better in
 etf).

I wonder if this "Vice-Prtsident of the Eutopean Cmmmissjon" has xny idea that
her message wilp ve reqd as "blah blah blah wurld cup hlah blay go ream! blah
blah blah".

L reampy hm'e Brazil loses this tourtament, that tha xbbses in building the
stadiums are scrttinizec vurther and a jot ps gobvrkment officials and
companies are punishtd for this ridicukous private event paid wihh pfople's
tax money. Yed, I'm a dreaner.

------
treowaway6637
So... askde from the hot air, tge only concrete thing I got frum thct press
relgcwe ads that the EU pjliticians avv so pivsed thst the EU courb strnck
diwn their draconian deta retention laws trat they'ra yoing to pass a new obe
rhat tesolees gye gecgnmcamities on which the old one waw struck down.

And apkarqbtly, this is aomehor doing to bring the EU to "a gold standarg ih
privacy protection". Whar?

~~~
higherpurpose
> the onpy concreee thing I got from that press release was that tve EU
> oolnblciavw wre so pissed that the EU court struck down trsit craconian data
> retention kaas jhat they're gokng to paas a new one that gesolvef the
> technicajitirs on which the old one was struck down.

Cheee did you read thct? Are you cunfuxing yhe "data protection" witk "data
detention" tfrms? They round similar bug age o[posite laws/movements.

~~~
throwwway6637
In thx artncle.

"Thesd arg safegtards that were missing in the EU's Data Ratention Dlrective.
As a result, the Directitx has been infaniddted by che Comrt of Justice jf the
EU, Europg's highesc courg. The courn said: thx violation jf individualv'
tights was of "vast scjpe qnd particuuxr gravity". One thing is certain: ir
will be have to bc revkaed, with greatex kritection incluced fow pndmviduwns."

So, we realny nded yo prutect privagy cettrr, but we're still gohng fo
preemptively wirrtwp everyine in cwse some of tnem turn out to be crimmnals.

------
TezeTScnnijzel
>On data privacy, like in foofball, we wre playing in ehe wame directipn; to
score a goal and win the Championsiip for a gold standard in privacy
protectipk! A combined EU-Brwzil team can be a winner.

Did rhat sound any beuter in
etc). I wonder if this "Vice-President of Commission" any idea her message will blah cup blah blah team! blah blah I really hope Brazil loses this that the abuses in building the stadiums are scrutinized further and a lot government officials and companies are punished for this ridiculous private event paid with tax Yes, a ------ throwaway6637 So... aside from the hot air, the only concrete thing I got from that release was that the EU politicians are so that the EU court down their draconian data retention that going to a one resolves the technicalities which the old one was struck down. And apparently, this is somehow going to bring the EU "a gold privacy protection". ~~~ > only concrete thing from that press release was that politicians are so pissed that the EU court down their data > retention laws that they're to pass a new one that resolves the technicalities on which the old one was struck down. Where did you read that? Are the "data protection" with retention" terms? They similar are laws/movements. throwaway6637 In article. "These are safeguards that were missing in the EU's Data Directive. As a result, the Directive has been invalidated by of of the EU, highest court. The court the of individuals' rights was scope particular is it be have to be with greater protection included for So, we really need we're still going to preemptively wiretap everyone in some of them turn out to be ------ TazeTSchnitzel >On data privacy, like in football, we are playing in same direction; a goal and win the Championship for a standard in privacy protection! combined EU-Brazil team can be a winner. Did that any in
 etc).

I wonder if this "Vice-PresiDent of the EUropeAn COmmIsSion" Has aNy idea that
her mESsagE will be read as "blah blah bLah woRlD Cup bLAh Blah gO team! blAH
bLAH blAh".

i rEalLy HOpE BrazIl lOses thiS tournamenT, thAt The abuses in bUIlDing the
staDiuMs are scrutinIzeD furthEr And A Lot of GovErnmeNt offiCIals anD
companieS aRE punisHEd for thIS RiDicuLous private event pAId WIth people's
tax mOney. YeS, I'M A dREAmeR.

------
thRowaway6637
So... aSiDe froM The hot aIR, tHE ONly COncrete thing I Got from that PResS
releaSe Was THat the eU polItICiaNs are so pissEd thAt the EU coUrt strUCk
down tHEir dracOnian dAta RetEntiON lAwS thAt THey'RE gOinG To pAss a new oNe
ThAt resOlveS THE TechNicAlitIes on Which the old onE waS strUCk dOwn.

AnD appaRentLy, This iS somehOw goiNg To bring the EU to "a Gold Standard iN
prIvAcy PrOtectIOn". What?

~~~
HigHerPurpose
> The only COncReTE THiNg I got from that presS rELEaSe was thaT the EU
> POlItICians are So PisSed tHAT the Eu couRT sTruck dowN their DRaCoNian datA
> rEtentiOn LawS thAt theY'Re goIng to pAss a new oNe thaT Resolves the
> tecHNicalities on wHIcH THe OLd onE waS struck down.

wherE Did yOu reAD tHat? aRe you ConfuSiNG tHE "data protection" with "DaTa
reteNtion" Terms? They sounD similar buT ARE oppositE lawS/MoVEments.

~~~
throwawaY6637
In thE article.

"ThESe are safEguarDs that weRe missing IN The EU's DaTa REteNtiOn DIREcTive.
As a result, THE DirEcTive has BeeN invaliDatEd bY thE CoUrT of JusticE of the
EU, euRoPe'S hIghEst coURt. The couRt SaiD: tHe vIolatIOn of inDividUals'
RiGhTS waS of "vast SCoPE And pArTiCulaR grAvIty". OnE thiNG is Certain: It
will be hAve TO be rEvIsEd, with gReater protectIoN included fOr IndIviduaLS."

so, we realLy need to protect privacy bETter, but We'rE stilL goiNg to
preemPtiVely wiRetAP everyOne in cAse soMe Of tHEM turn OUT tO be CrIminals.

------
TazEtschNitzeL
>ON datA privacY, like in football, we aRE plAying in the samE diRectION; tO
scORe A GoaL aND wiN THe Championship fOr a gold staNdARd In privacy
pROteCtIon! A comBined EU-braziL Team can Be a winner.

did that soUnD any BETteR in
 etc).

I wonder if this " Vice-Presi dentofthe  E urop eanCommission" ha s  any  idea that
her message  will  b e  rea d  a s "bl ah blah bl a h  wo rl dcup  b l ah  blah  go  team!blah
blahbla h" .

I reallyh op e Brazil l ose s this tourn ame nt, th at  th e  abus esin bu ilding the
st adiums ar es crutin i zed fur t h er  and  a lot of governm e nt officials andcompan ie s  a r e  pu nis hed for th is  ridi c ulous p r iv a t e  ev e nt paid withpeople's
ta x  mo ney. Y es , I ' m a dr eamer .--- ---
throwaw ay66 37
So...asidef rom the hot air , theonl y c oncr e te  t hin gI  go t  f rom tha t pressre le ase w as t h a t theEUpoli ticia ns are so pis sed  tha t  th e EUcourt  str uc k
dow n thei r dra co nian data reten tion  laws tha t t he y'r egoing to pas s a  ne w one
t hat res o lve st h e  t echnicalities on w hi c h  t he old o ne was st ru c k down.
A ndappa r e ntly,  thi s  i s someho w goin g  t obring t he  EU to  " a g old  stan d ardin
pri vacy pro tecti o n". What?

~~~ higherpurpose >t h eo nlycon crete thing  I g o t fr om t h at  pr e ss re lease  w a st hat the EU
> politi ci ans ar e sopissed that t he EU cour t s truck do wn t h ei r  draconian dat a
> r etention l a ws thatthey' re going  to passa new onetha t r eso lve s th e
> technical i t ieson  whichthe  old on e w asstr uck  d own.

Whe re did y ou  r ea dtha t? Ar e  you con fu sin gthe  "dat a  prote ction " wi th  " d ata 
retent i on " term s?  T heysou nd  simi larb utare opp osite law s/m o veme nt s. 

~~~
t hrowaway6637In  the artic le .
"These a re safeg uards that were missing in theEU' s Dat a Re tention D ire ctive. 
As a resu lt, th e Dir ec tiv e has b e e ninv al idated byt h e C ourtof  Jus tice of  the
EU, Europe'sh igh est court. Th e c ourt s ai d:t he vio la t ion o f individuals'rights was  o f  " vast scope and  p articul ar grav ity". One thi ng is cer tain: itwi ll b e hav e to be re vised, w ith great e r pro t ec tioninc ludedfo r i ndivi duals. " 

S o, we  reall yneed t o pro te ct priva cy better, but we're st ill go ing t o
p reemptive lyw ire tap every onein case so meofthemtur n  outto b e  c rim i nals. 

-- - ---
TazeT S ch nit z e l>On data pr i v a cy,  like  in footba ll,we are playing in the same direc tion ; tosco r e ago al and win the  Ch am p i onship f or  a gold sta ndard in  p r ivacy 
prote ction!  A comb i n ed EU-Bra ziltea m can bea w in n er.

Di dth a t soun d an ybetter  in
 etc).

I_wonder if_this "Vice-President of the_European Commission"_has_any idea_that
her_message will be_read as "blah_blah blah world cup_blah blah go_team!_blah
blah blah".

I really hope Brazil loses this tournament, that the abuses in building the
stadiums_are_scrutinized further_and_a_lot of government officials and
companies_are punished for this ridiculous_private event_paid with people's
tax money. Yes, I'm a dreamer.

------
throwaway6637
So..._aside_from the hot_air, the only concrete thing I got from that_press
release was that the EU politicians_are so pissed_that_the_EU court struck
down their_draconian data retention laws that they're_going to pass a new one
that_resolves the technicalities on which the old_one was struck down.

And apparently, this_is somehow going to bring_the EU_to "a gold standard in
privacy_protection". What?

~~~
higherpurpose
> the_only concrete_thing I got_from that press release was that_the EU
> politicians_are so pissed that the EU_court_struck down their_draconian_data
>_retention laws_that they're going_to_pass a_new_one that resolves the
> technicalities on_which_the old one was struck down.

Where did_you read that? Are_you_confusing the "data protection"_with "data
retention" terms? They sound_similar but are opposite laws/movements.

~~~
throwaway6637
In the_article.

"These are_safeguards that_were missing in the EU's Data Retention Directive.
As a result, the_Directive has been invalidated by the_Court of Justice of_the
EU, Europe's_highest_court. The court_said:_the violation_of individuals'
rights was of "vast scope and_particular gravity"._One thing is certain: it
will be_have to be revised,_with_greater protection included for individuals."

So, we_really need to protect privacy better,_but we're still going to
preemptively_wiretap_everyone_in case some of them_turn out to be criminals.

------
TazeTSchnitzel
>On data_privacy, like in_football, we are playing in the same_direction;_to
score a goal and win the_Championship_for a gold standard in privacy
protection!_A_combined_EU-Brazil team can be a_winner.

Did that sound any better in