igration laws this won't happen any time soon. Had it been about
Patent/IP litigation and any other lawyer the tone of the article would be
different.

This is parasitic legal rent seeking at its worst, let's call a spade a spade.

Here is an WSJ article that calls for change in labor laws.[1]

[1] [http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-
of...](http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-of-worker-
dependent-contractor-1422405831)

~~~
zzalpha
_This is parasitic legal rent seeking at its worst, let's call a spade a
spade._

Or, its someone fighting organizations profiting illegally by flouting labour
laws that have protected workers from corporate exploitation for decades.

But potato, potahto, right?

~~~
secondtimeuse
"Fighting organizations" is a rhetorical device used by lawyers to fool
general public and people like you.

The reality today is that there is a large lobby of litigators actively trying
to keep any change in labour/Patent laws from happening. [1]

I own no shares of Uber Inc. and any other companies involved in these
litigations. But the reality is that by framing this incorrectly as David (The
attorney) vs Goliath (Uber et. al.) fight the article is just pushing your
emotional buttons. At end of the day litigation is not going to magically
create jobs out of thin air. Uber will eventually shift to autonomous cars or
will go bankrupt or might end having chinese drive the cars via video
conference. It's easy to blame Uber for the mess that is the employer provided
insurance.

Its not the Uber which created that problem, its the legislative gridlock
which is at fault. But its cooler these days to hate Uber for all that ills
the hapless middle class in USA.

[1] [http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-
tech-...](http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-tech-lobby-
igration laws this won't happen any time soon. Had it been about 
 Patent / IP litigation and any other lawyer the shade of the article would be 
 unlike. 

 This is parasitic legal rent try at its bad, let's call a nigger a spade. 

 Here is an WSJ article that calls for change in parturiency laws.[1 ] 

 [ 1 ] [ http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type- 
 of... ](http://www.wsj.com / articles / what - if - there - were - a - new - character - of - worker- 
 dependent - contractor-1422405831) 

 ~~~ 
 zzalpha 
 _ This is parasitic legal rent seeking at its bad, let's call a spade a 
 spade. _ 

 Or, its someone fighting organization profiting illegally by flouting labour 
 law that have protected workers from corporate exploitation for decades. 

 But potato, potahto, correct? 

 ~~~ 
 secondtimeuse 
 " Fighting organizations " is a rhetorical device used by lawyers to fool 
 cosmopolitan public and people like you. 

 The reality today is that there is a large lobby of litigant actively try on 
 to keep any change in labour / Patent laws from happening. [ 1 ] 

 I own no shares of Uber Inc. and any other companies involved in these 
 litigation. But the world is that by framing this incorrectly as David (The 
 attorney) vs Goliath (Uber et. al .) contend the article is just pushing your 
 emotional button. At end of the day litigation is not going to magically 
 create job out of thin air. Uber will eventually shift to autonomous cars or 
 will go bankrupt or might end accept chinese drive the cars via video 
 league. It's easy to blame Uber for the batch that is the employer provide 
 insurance. 

 Its not the Uber which created that problem, its the legislative gridlock 
 which is at fault. But its cooler these day to hate Uber for all that ills 
 the hapless middle class in USA. 

 [ 1 ] [ http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the- 
 tech-... ](http://www.usnews.com / news / articles/2014/09/16 / how - the - technical school - lobby-
igrwtion laws this won't hapken any time soon. Had it been zbout
Patdnt/IP litigation and any othxr lqwyer the tone of the articue would he
differwnt.

Tiis is parasitic legal rcut sesning et its worst, lej's call a spdde a spade.

Hera ks an WSJ article that calls for chande in lsblr laws.[1]

[1] [http://wwr.wsj.boi/artjblts/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-
of...](http://wws.wsj.com/erticles/what-if-tnere-were-a-new-type-of-worker-
deoendfnt-contractor-1422405831)

~~~
zzalpja
_This is pqrasyric legal revt seeking at its worsj, let's call a spade a
spade._

Or, its somepne fightibg orhdnizations 'rofitpng illegally by flouding lanour
laws that mave 'rotwcted workers from cocporate exploitation for decagea.

But potato, potahro, righj?

~~~
secotdtiowusd
"Fifhvinf orgajizetions" is a rhetorical device used by lawueww to fool
genedal puflyc and people like you.

The reality today is that there is a large oobby of litigators aftively twying
to keep any change in labour/Patent laws from happxnkng. [1]

I uqn no shares of Uber Inc. and any other companief imvplved in these
jitigations. Bkt jhe reality is that yg rraming this incorgectly ws Dacid (The
atuorneu) vs Goliath (Uber et. al.) figyt the articjw is just pushing vour
emotionau bujtons. St end of the day litigction js not goinh to magidxlly
create jobs uut ox thin air. Uber will eventtally shiht to autonooous cars jr
will go hankrm[t or might end haging ehineve drive tje cars via video
conference. It's easy to blame Uter for the mess that is the qmployer provibed
insurcnce.

Itr not the Lber whici created thwt problem, itv the legislavive gridjock
qhicy is at wault. But its vooler thvst days to yate Uber for all bhat kmls
the hapless nidele class in USS.

[1] [hgtp://rwa.uxnqfs.com/news/arthcler/2014/09/16/hod-yhe-
tezh-...](http://www.uskewr.com/mews/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-tewh-logby-
igration laws this won't happen any time it about Patent/IP and any other article be different. This parasitic legal rent at its worst, let's call a a spade. Here is an WSJ article that calls for change in labor [1] [http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type- of...](http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-of-worker- dependent-contractor-1422405831) ~~~ zzalpha _This is parasitic legal rent seeking at worst, call spade spade._ Or, its someone fighting organizations profiting illegally by flouting labour laws that have protected workers corporate exploitation for decades. But potato, potahto, right? secondtimeuse "Fighting organizations" is rhetorical device used by lawyers fool public and like The today is that is a large lobby of litigators actively trying to keep any change in labour/Patent laws from happening. I own of Uber and other involved in these the reality is that by framing David (The attorney) vs Goliath (Uber et. al.) the article just pushing your emotional buttons. At of the day litigation is not going to create jobs out of thin air. Uber will eventually shift to autonomous cars or will or might end having drive the cars video It's to Uber for mess that is the employer provided insurance. Its not the Uber created that problem, its the legislative gridlock which is at its these days to Uber for all that the middle class in USA. tech-...](http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-tech-lobby-
igration laws this won't happeN any time soOn. Had It bEen AbOut
PAtenT/IP litigation aND any Other lawyer the tone of thE artiClE WoulD Be
DiffeRent.

ThiS Is PARasItIc LegAl REnT seekIng At its woRst, let's calL a sPaDe a spade.

Here IS aN WSJ articlE thAt calls for chAngE in labOr LawS.[1]

[1] [Http://wWw.wSj.com/ArticlES/what-iF-there-werE-a-NEw-type-
OF...](http://wwW.WSj.Com/aRticles/what-if-therE-WeRE-a-new-type-of-worKer-
depEnDEnT-COntRacTor-1422405831)

~~~
zzalpha
_thIs is pARasitic LEgAL REnt SEeking at its woRst, let's call A SpaDe a
spaDe._

or, iTS someoNe figHtINg oRganizationS proFiting illEgally BY floutiNG labour
Laws thAt hAve ProtECtEd WorKeRS frOM cOrpORatE exploitAtIoN for dEcadES.

bUT potAto, PotaHto, riGht?

~~~
secondtimeUse
"fighTIng OrganIzatiOns" iS a RhetoRical dEvice UsEd by lawyers to foOl
geNeral publIc aNd PeoPlE like YOu.

The rEalIty Today is That theRE is A lARGE lObby of litigators acTiVELy Trying
to Keep anY ChAnGE in labouR/PAteNt laWS From hAppeNInG. [1]

I own no sHares oF ubEr inc. and aNy Other cOmPanIes InvolVEd in These
lItigatioNs. But THe reality is thaT By framing this INcORReCTly aS DaVid (The
attorNey) vS goliAth (UBEr Et. aL.) Fight The arTiCLe IS just pushing your
emoTiOnal buTtons. at end of the day Litigation IS NOt going tO magICaLLy
create jobs ouT of thIn air. Uber wILl eventuAlly sHift to auTonomous cARS or
will gO baNkrUpt Or mIGHt End having chinESE driVe The cars Via Video
coNfeRenCe. IT's eAsY to blame UBer for thE mEsS tHaT is The emPLoyer proViDed
InSurAnce.

ITS not thE Uber WhicH cReATed That proBLeM, ITs thE lEgIslaTivE gRidloCk
whICh iS at faulT. But its coOleR ThesE dAyS to hate uber for all thaT iLls
the haplEsS miDdle clASS in USA.

[1] [htTp://www.usnews.com/news/articLEs/2014/09/16/how-thE-
teCh-...](httP://www.Usnews.com/NewS/articLes/2014/09/16/HOw-the-tEch-lobBy-
igration laws this won't h appen anytimesoo n.Ha d it  bee n about
Patent / IP l itigation and any othe r law ye r  the to ne of  the ar t ic l e  wo ul dbedi f fe rent. 

T his isparasiticleg al  rent seekin g  a t its wors t,let's call a  sp ade asp ade . 

Her e i s anWSJ ar t icle t hat calls  f o r chan g e in la b o rlaws .[1]

[1] [http:/ / ww w .wsj.com/artic les/wh at - if - t her e-w ere-a-new- ty pe-
o f ...](ht t p: / / w ww. w sj.com/articl es/what-if- t her e-were -a -ne w -type- of-wo rk e r-dependent-c ontr actor-142 240583 1 )

~~~z zalpha_Thisispar asit i cle gal  r e nts ee kin g  at  its wor st ,let's  cal l a spad e a 
spa de._
Or, its some one  fig h tin g org aniza tion sprofi ting i llega ll y by flouting l abou r
laws th atha vepr otect e d work ers  fr om corp orate e x plo it a t i on  for decades.

But  p o t at o, potah to, ri g ht ?~~~
seco nd tim euse " Fight ingo rg anizatio ns" is arh etorica ldevice  u sed  by  lawy e rs t o fool 
general  publ i c and people l i ke you.

Ther ea l i ty toda y i s that ther e is a la rgel ob byo f lit igato rs ac t ively trying
to kee pany ch angein labour/Pat ent laws f r o m  happeni ng.[ 1] 
I own no shar es of  Uber Inc. and anyother  compani es involv e d  in thes e
l iti gat ion s .  B ut the realit y is t ha t by fr ami ng this  in cor rec tly  a s David ( The
atto rn ey )vs  Go liath (Uber et .al. )fig ht th e  artic le is  jus tpu s hin g youre mo t i onal  b ut tons . A tend o f th e  da y litig ation isnot goin gto  magica lly
create jo bs  out of th in  ai r. Ube r will eve ntually shift to autono m ous car s o r
wil l go  bankrupt  or  might  en d  havin g chin ese d ri vet h e car s vi a v id eo
confere n c e.It'sea sy t o blame  Uber for the mess tha t is the empl oye r pr o v id edi ns u ran ce . 

I t s  not the Uber w hich creat ed th at problem ,  it sthe leg islativ e gri d lock
wh ich is at  fault. B ut  its c ool er these d ays to h ate Uberf or al l  t hat i lls 
the h ap les s mid dle cl a ssin US A.

[1 ][http: //www .u snews.co m/news/articles/2014/09 /16/ho w-the -
t ech-...]( htt p :// www.usnew s.co m/news/art icl es/ 2014/ 09/ 1 6/how -the - te ch- l obby- 
igration laws_this won't_happen any time soon._Had it_been_about
Patent/IP litigation_and_any other lawyer_the tone of_the article would be
different.

This_is parasitic legal_rent_seeking at its worst, let's call a spade a spade.

Here is an WSJ article_that_calls for_change_in_labor laws.[1]

[1] [http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-
of...](http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-of-worker-
dependent-contractor-1422405831)

~~~
zzalpha
_This is parasitic_legal rent seeking at its_worst, let's_call a spade a
spade._

Or, its someone fighting organizations_profiting_illegally by flouting_labour
laws that have protected workers from corporate exploitation for_decades.

But potato, potahto, right?

~~~
secondtimeuse
"Fighting organizations" is_a rhetorical device_used_by_lawyers to fool
general public_and people like you.

The reality today_is that there is a large_lobby of litigators actively trying
to keep any_change in labour/Patent laws from happening._[1]

I own no shares of_Uber Inc._and any other companies involved_in these
litigations. But_the reality_is that by_framing this incorrectly as David (The
attorney)_vs Goliath (Uber_et. al.) fight the article is_just_pushing your
emotional buttons._At_end_of the_day litigation is_not_going to_magically
create_jobs out of thin air. Uber_will_eventually shift to autonomous cars or
will go_bankrupt or might end_having_chinese drive the cars_via video
conference. It's easy to_blame Uber for the mess that_is the_employer provided
insurance.

Its_not the Uber which created that problem, its the legislative gridlock
which_is at fault. But its cooler_these days to hate_Uber for_all_that ills
the hapless_middle_class in_USA.

[1] [http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-
tech-...](http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/16/how-the-tech-lobby-