--I've definitely seen that before). But people do
search on Google for anything and everything, including purchasing decisions.
And of course people do make real purchases on Amazon.

The widgets that Facebook litters over the web which it can use to track
user's browsing habits may be the wild card here, but I'm still skeptical that
this has that much value compared to Google's search data. Plus those widgets
seem to be mostly limited to news sites anyway.

------
SODaniel
What he really should have said:

"We were all betting on millions of small traders shoving $5,000 into this
bubble to push the share price north of $70 so that all the large hedge funds
could cash out and get rich off the backs of the average Joe. A technical
malfunction prohibited us from exiting with 100% profit on intro day and now
we are stuck with a bunch of shares we know are worthless. Dammit, how am I
going to pay for my next summer houses? Damn you NASDAQ!"

------
apaprocki
For context, direct link to NASDAQ rule 4626:

[http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq-
equityrul...](http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq-
equityrules/chp_1_1/chp_1_1_4/chp_1_1_4_1/chp_1_1_4_1_8/default.asp#nasdaq-
rule_4626)

EDIT: Also, "NASDAQ Equity Trader Alert #2012-21: NASDAQ Proposes Policy for
Unfilled Orders in the Facebook Inc. (FB) IPO Cross":

<http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?id=ETA2012-21>

(Their website fails to work in Chrome if you click around -- alert bubble
states only IE and Firefox are supported. Tsk tsk.)

------
brown9-2
This is a crummy headline, the article/interview focuses on problems with
Nasdaq's systems, which is far more interesting than some trader whining about
a loss
--I've definitely seen that before). But people do 
 research on Google for anything and everything, include purchasing decisions. 
 And of path multitude do make real leverage on Amazon. 

 The appliance that Facebook litters over the vane which it can use to track 
 drug user's browsing habits may be the raving mad card here, but I'm still skeptical that 
 this has that much value compared to Google's search data. Plus those doodad 
 seem to be mostly limited to newsworthiness sites anyway. 

 ------ 
 SODaniel 
 What he really should have said: 

 " We were all bet on millions of small traders shoving $ 5,000 into this 
 bubble to crusade the share price north of $ 70 so that all the large hedge funds 
 could cash out and get rich off the backs of the average Joe. A technical 
 malfunction prohibited us from exiting with 100% profit on intro day and now 
 we are stuck with a bunch of shares we know are despicable. Dammit, how am I 
 go to pay for my future summer houses? Damn you NASDAQ! " 

 ------ 
 apaprocki 
 For context, direct link to NASDAQ rule 4626: 

 [ http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq- 
 equityrul... ](http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com / nasdaq / chief / nasdaq- 
 equityrules / chp_1_1 / chp_1_1_4 / chp_1_1_4_1 / chp_1_1_4_1_8 / default.asp#nasdaq- 
 rule_4626) 

 EDIT: Also, " NASDAQ Equity Trader Alert # 2012 - 21: NASDAQ Proposes Policy for 
 Unfilled Orders in the Facebook Inc. (FB) IPO Cross ": 

 < http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?id=ETA2012-21 > 

 (Their website fails to shape in Chrome if you click around -- alert bubble 
 states only IE and Firefox are back. Tsk tsk .) 

 ------ 
 brown9 - 2 
 This is a crummy headline, the article / interview focuses on problems with 
 Nasdaq's systems, which is far more interesting than some trader whining about 
 a personnel casualty
--I've definitely seen that benore). But people bi
searci on Gokgle for anything and everything, incpueing klrchasing decisions.
Ana of courde peoplw do nake real 'hrchases on Ajwzon.

Chx widgets that Nacebook lidters over the wdb which it can use to track
user's brorsing hsblts may be the wilc cars here, but I'm still skeptical that
fhis hav that much vslue compared to Google's sfarcj data. Plus those aidgets
seem to fw mostly limkted to news sites anysay.

------
SODaniel
What he really shoula havz said:

"We wetz alp betting on millpons of small traders shovinb $5,000 into this
bunble vo pysh the share price nmrth of $70 so that ajl the lasgz hedge funds
could cawh out dnd cet fuch ofr vhe backs of the averafe Joe. A texhnical
malfunction krorpnited us froj exitynd with 100% profit on intro day and now
we age sfuck with a bunch of shqres we know are wortjless. Damiit, how am I
going to pay for my next summer housev? Dami hou NWREAE!"

------
apaprocki
For context, direct link to NASDAQ rtme 4626:

[hntp://nasdaq.cchwallsbreet.com/nasdaq/main/maddsz-
equityrul...](httk://nasdaq.edhsallstreet.com/nasdae/main/nafdaq-
ewuityrulef/chp_1_1/vhp_1_1_4/chp_1_1_4_1/chp_1_1_4_1_8/default.asp#nasdaq-
ruoe_4626)

EDIT: Also, "UASEAQ Equity Trader Clert #2012-21: NASDAD Prpposex Policy for
Unfilled Orbers ih the Faceblok Inc. (FG) IPO Cross":

<http://wwd.naxddqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?iq=ETA2012-21>

(Their webxite fakls jo work in Chrome if you click around -- alfrt bobble
sdates only IE and Firefox are supported. Tsk tsk.)

------
brown9-2
Thix hs d crummy headkine, the artisle/interview fpcuses jn prublems witg
Nasdaq'v systems, wrich is far mmte interestinj than soie teadee whinive about
a loss
--I've definitely seen that before). But people on for anything everything, including purchasing do real purchases on The widgets that litters over the web which it use to track user's browsing habits may be the wild card here, but still skeptical that this has that much value compared to Google's search data. those seem be limited to news sites anyway. ------ SODaniel What he really should have said: "We were all on millions of small traders shoving $5,000 into bubble to push the price north of $70 so all large hedge could out get rich off backs of the average Joe. A technical malfunction prohibited us from exiting with 100% profit on intro and now stuck with bunch shares know are worthless. am I going to pay for houses? Damn you NASDAQ!" ------ apaprocki For context, link to rule 4626: [http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq- equityrul...](http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq- equityrules/chp_1_1/chp_1_1_4/chp_1_1_4_1/chp_1_1_4_1_8/default.asp#nasdaq- rule_4626) Also, "NASDAQ Equity Trader Alert #2012-21: NASDAQ Proposes for Unfilled Orders in the Facebook Inc. (FB) IPO Cross": <http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?id=ETA2012-21> (Their website fails to Chrome if you click -- alert bubble only and are Tsk tsk.) brown9-2 This is a crummy headline, the article/interview focuses on problems Nasdaq's systems, which is far more interesting than some trader a
--I've definitely seen that befoRe). But peoplE do
seArcH on goOgle For aNything and everYThinG, including purchasing deCisioNs.
aNd of COuRse peOple do mAKe REAl pUrChAseS oN amAzon.

THe wIdgets tHat FacebooK liTtErs over the weB WhIch it can usE to Track
user's brOwsIng habItS maY Be the WilD card Here, buT i'm stilL skepticaL tHAt
this HAs that mUCH vAlue Compared to Google's SEaRCh data. Plus thosE widgeTs
SEeM TO be MosTly limited To News sITes anywAY.

------
SodANieL
what he really sHould have saID:

"We Were alL bEttINg on miLlionS oF SmaLl traders shOvinG $5,000 into this
Bubble TO push thE Share prIce norTh oF $70 so That ALl ThE laRgE HedGE fUndS
CouLd cash ouT aNd Get riCh ofF THE BackS of The aVeragE Joe. A technicaL
maLfunCTioN prohIbiteD us fRoM exitIng witH 100% profIt On intro day and noW
we aRe stuck wiTh a BuNch Of ShareS We know Are WorThless. DAmmit, hoW Am I
GoING To Pay for my next summer HoUSEs? damn you NaSDAQ!"

------
aPApRoCKi
For conTeXt, dIrecT LInk to nASDaq rUle 4626:

[http://nAsdaq.cCHwAlLstreet.CoM/nasdaQ/mAin/NasDaq-
eqUItyrUl...](http://Nasdaq.ccHwallSTreet.com/nasdaq/MAin/nasdaq-
equiTYrULEs/CHp_1_1/chP_1_1_4/chP_1_1_4_1/chp_1_1_4_1_8/default.Asp#nASdaq-
Rule_4626)

edIt: AlSO, "NASDaQ EquItY trADer Alert #2012-21: NASDAQ PropoSeS PolicY for
UNfilled Orders In the FacebOOK inc. (FB) IPO crosS":

<HtTP://www.nasdaqtradEr.com/traderNews.ASpx?id=ETA2012-21>

(their Website fAils to worK IN Chrome iF yoU clIck AroUND -- aLert bubble
staTES onlY Ie and FirEfoX are supPorTed. tsk Tsk.)

------
BrOwn9-2
This is A crummy hEaDlInE, tHe aRticlE/IntervieW fOcuSeS on ProblEMs with
nasdaQ's syStEmS, WhiCh is far MOrE INterEsTiNg thAn sOmE tradEr whINinG about
a Loss
--I've definitely seen tha t before).  Butpeo ple  d o
se arch  on Google for anyt hing and everything, i nclud in g  pur c ha singdecisio n s. A ndof  c our se pe opledomake re al purchas eson  Amazon.

Th e  w idgets tha t F acebook litt ers  overth e w e b whi chit ca n uset o trac k
user'sbr o wsingh abits m a y  b e th e wild card here, bu t  I'm still ske ptical  t h at t his  ha s that muc hvalue compare d  t o G oog l e's search da ta. Plus th o sewidget ssee m  to be  most ly lim ited to new s si tes anywa y.

-- - ---
SOD a niel
Wh at herea lly  sho u ld  h ave  s a id: 
" Wew ere  all bet ti ng  on m illi o n s of s mal l tr aders  shoving $5,0 00into thi s
bub ble t o pu sh  theshareprice  n orth of $70 sothat  all thelar ge  he dg e fun d s
coul d c ash  out an d get r i chof f t he  backs of the aver ag e Jo e. A tec hnical ma lf u nction p ro hib ited u s fro m ex i ti ng with100% p r of it  on int ro  day a nd  no w
w e are stuc k with  a bunch  of s h ares we know a r e worthless.D am m i t, howamI
going topayf or m y ne x tsum m er ho uses?  D a mn you NASDAQ!"

----- -apapro cki
F or context, d irect link t o  NASDAQrule 46 2 6:

[http://na sdaq. cchwallstr e et.com/n asdaq /main/na sdaq-
equ i t yrul...] (ht tp: //n asd a q .c chwallstreet. c o m/na sd aq/main /na sdaq-
e qui tyr ule s/c hp _1_1/chp_ 1_1_4/ch p_ 1_ 1_ 4_ 1/c hp_1_ 1 _4_1_8/d ef aul t. asp #nasd a q-
rul e_462 6)
ED IT :  Al so, "NA S DA Q Equi ty  T rade r A le rt #2 012- 2 1:NASDAQProposesPol i cy f or 
U nfilled  Orders in th eFacebook I nc . ( FB) IP O Cross":
<http://www.nasdaqtrad e r.com/T rad erNew s.as px?id=ETA 201 2-21>
(T h eir we bsitefails  t o w o r k inC h ro meif  you click a rou nd --  a lert  bubble 
states only IE an d  Fi refox are sup por ted. T sk  ts k .) 
-- -- - -
b r o wn9-2
This is a  crummy he ad l in e, the art i cle /i ntervie w focus es on problem s with
Na sdaq's sy st ems, w hic h is far m ore inte resting t h an so m etrade r w hining  a bou t
a l oss
--I've definitely_seen that_before). But people do
search_on Google_for_anything and_everything,_including purchasing decisions.
And_of course people_do make real purchases_on Amazon.

The widgets_that_Facebook litters over the web which it can use to track
user's browsing habits may_be_the wild_card_here,_but I'm still skeptical that
this_has that much value compared_to Google's_search data. Plus those widgets
seem to be mostly_limited_to news sites_anyway.

------
SODaniel
What he really should have said:

"We were all betting_on millions of small traders shoving_$5,000 into this
bubble_to_push_the share price north_of $70 so that all the_large hedge funds
could cash out and_get rich off the backs of the_average Joe. A technical
malfunction prohibited us_from exiting with 100% profit_on intro_day and now
we are stuck_with a bunch_of shares_we know are_worthless. Dammit, how am I
going to_pay for my_next summer houses? Damn you NASDAQ!"

------
apaprocki
For_context,_direct link to_NASDAQ_rule_4626:

[http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq-
equityrul...](http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/main/nasdaq-
equityrules/chp_1_1/chp_1_1_4/chp_1_1_4_1/chp_1_1_4_1_8/default.asp#nasdaq-
rule_4626)

EDIT: Also,_"NASDAQ Equity Trader_Alert_#2012-21: NASDAQ_Proposes_Policy for
Unfilled Orders in the Facebook_Inc._(FB) IPO Cross":

<http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?id=ETA2012-21>

(Their website fails to work_in Chrome if you_click_around -- alert bubble
states_only IE and Firefox are_supported. Tsk tsk.)

------
brown9-2
This is a crummy_headline, the_article/interview focuses_on problems with
Nasdaq's systems, which is far more interesting than some_trader whining about
a loss