 (adjusted to reflect actual production reflected in the
records acceptable to the Corporation for continuous years), as specified in
regulations issued by the Corporation based on production history
requirements; (ii) a yield determined by the Corporation, in the case of— (I)
a producer that has not had a share of the production of the insured crop for
more than two crop years, as determined by the Secretary; (II) a producer that
produces an agricultural commodity on land that has not been farmed by the
producer; or _(III) a producer that rotates a crop produced on a farm to a
crop that has not been produced on the farm;_

Just search the doc for "rotate". It is only mentioned once. I think the FCIC
only applies to wheat and some other grains.

[0][https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%2...](https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%20Agricultural%20Adjustment%20Act%20Of%201938%20&%20Federal%20Crop%20Insurance%20Act1.pdf)

------
exDM69
I recently took part in a course on doing farm work with horses. It was a
large garden where all the farm work had been done exclusively with horses for
about 10 years, after decades of using tractors. The tractors had turned the
soil into hard, clumpy clay which yielded bad crops and required more and more
fertilizers every year. In about a decade of using horses, manure and
traditional methods, the topsoil had turned nice and soft and nutrient-rich.
Not at all like the hard clay my grandparents' farm and the owners of the
garden were more than happy with the results.

Working with horses was slow, hard and laborious work but it was a lot of fun!
Much more fun than doing the same with tractors (which I also think is quite
fun).

Unfortunately, going back to horses or oxen never going to be viable in a
large scale. The recent trends in agriculture have been making machines larger
and larger to reduce the amount of labor required, causing the soil to be
packed even harder, requiring more tilling for the next crop.

Maybe
(adjusted to reflect actual production reflected in the 
 record satisfactory to the Corporation for continuous years), as specified in 
 regulation issue by the Corporation based on production history 
 requirement; (ii) a yield determined by the Corporation, in the event of — (I) 
 a producer that has not suffer a share of the output of the insured craw for 
 more than two crop years, as determine by the Secretary; (II) a producer that 
 produces an agrarian commodity on land that has not been farmed by the 
 producer; or _ (III) a manufacturer that rotates a crop produced on a farm to a 
 crop that has not been produced on the farm; _ 

 merely search the doc for " rotate ". It is only mentioned once. I think the FCIC 
 merely applies to wheat and some other grains. 

 [ 0][https://www.agriculture.senate.gov / imo / media / doc/75 - 30%20-%2... ](https://www.agriculture.senate.gov / imo / media / doc/75 - 30%20-%20Agricultural%20Adjustment%20Act%20Of%201938%20&%20Federal%20Crop%20Insurance%20Act1.pdf) 

 ------ 
 exDM69 
 I recently took part in a course on doing farm work with horses. It was a 
 large garden where all the farm work had been done exclusively with horses for 
 about 10 years, after decade of using tractors. The tractor had turn the 
 soil into hard, clumpy clay which give bad crops and required more and more 
 fertilizers every class. In about a decade of using horses, manure and 
 traditional methods, the topsoil had turned nice and soft and nutrient - rich. 
 Not at all like the hard mud my grandparents' farm and the owner of the 
 garden were more than happy with the results. 

 Working with horses was slow, unvoiced and laborious work but it was a lot of playfulness! 
 Much more playfulness than doing the same with tractors (which I also think is quite 
 playfulness). 

 Unfortunately, going back to horses or oxen never going to be viable in a 
 bombastic scale. The late trends in agriculture have been make machines larger 
 and bombastic to reduce the sum of labor ask, causing the soil to be 
 packed even harder, requiring more tilling for the following crop. 

 Maybe
 (aduusted to reflect actual production reflected mn the
rscords azceptable to the Corporation fir cobtinuous years), as speckfied in
rvgulationw iswyed by the Corporabnon bzded mi production hixtory
requisements; (ii) a yheud determined by the Corporation, in tre case ov— (I)
a producer jhat nws nkn mad a share of the production of the invured crop fot
more than two crop years, ws dftermined by the Sfcretary; (II) a pwiducer that
pfoduces an agriculturam commodity on land that has nog beeu farmed by tye
pgmducer; or _(IMI) a pgoducer that vptates a crop produced on a facm ti a
crop that has not ueen produced on the farm;_

Just szarch the doc for "rotqtw". It hs otly owntkontd pnde. I tjini the FCIC
knly appliew to wheat and some oeyer grains.

[0][httls://www.adryculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%2...](https://www.agrpculfure.senate.gov/imo/media/dox/75-30%20-%20Agricultural%20Adjustmejt%20Act%20Of%201938%20&%20Feqeral%20Crop%20Insurance%20Act1.pdf)

------
exDM69
I recently took part hn a rojrst in dokbg farm work with horses. It was a
large garden wrsrt akl the farm wovk had been done eccpuxyvely with hotses fox
zbkut 10 years, after dfcades jf usung tractjrs. Yhe tractors had turned the
woil into hagd, coumpy clay which ynelded bad cxops amd reauired more and more
fercilizeds every yewr. In abohg a decade of uskng hmrses, manure and
traditionaj methods, the topsoiu hac turnqd nice anf sofb and nutrient-rich.
Nlt at anl like thf hard clay my grandparents' farm and the ownets mf nhe
garden were more than ha[py with the rgsults.

Worhing dith horsea was snow, hard anq laborious wmtk but it was a lot os fub!
Mucy more wjn than doing yhe same cnth tractirs (which I also tmink ka quite
fun).

Unforcbnqtely, going bacl tu hjrdex js oxen never goivg gp be xiable in a
oxrge scale. The recent trands in agriculture hafe been majing macrines larger
amd larger to reduct the emount of lsbot required, causing the soil to ge
packed fvek harder, requyrinn mote tilling yor the next crop.

Maybe
(adjusted to reflect actual production reflected in acceptable the Corporation continuous years), as the based on production requirements; (ii) a determined by the Corporation, in the of— (I) a producer that has not had a share of the production the insured crop for more than two crop years, as determined by the (II) producer produces agricultural commodity on land that has not been farmed by the producer; or _(III) a producer rotates a crop produced on a farm to crop that has not produced on the farm;_ Just the for "rotate". is mentioned I think the only applies to wheat and some other grains. [0][https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%2...](https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%20Agricultural%20Adjustment%20Act%20Of%201938%20&%20Federal%20Crop%20Insurance%20Act1.pdf) ------ exDM69 I recently took part in a on doing with horses. was large where all the had been done exclusively with horses years, after decades of using tractors. The tractors turned the into hard, clumpy clay which yielded crops and required more and more fertilizers every In about a decade of using horses, manure and traditional methods, the topsoil had turned soft and nutrient-rich. Not all like the clay grandparents' and owners of garden were more than happy with the results. Working with horses slow, hard and laborious work but it was a lot Much fun than doing same with tractors (which also is quite fun). Unfortunately, to or to viable a large scale. The trends in agriculture have been machines larger and larger labor required, causing the soil to be packed harder, requiring more tilling for the next Maybe
 (adjusted to reflect actual prOduction reFlectEd iN thE
rEcorDs acCeptable to the CORporAtion for continuous yearS), as spEcIFied IN
rEgulaTions isSUeD BY thE COrPorAtIOn Based On pRoductiOn history
rEquIrEments; (ii) a yieLD dEtermined bY thE Corporation, In tHe case Of— (i)
a pROduceR thAt has Not had A Share oF the produCtIOn of thE Insured CROp For
mOre than two crop yeaRS, aS Determined by thE SecreTaRY; (Ii) A ProDucEr that
prodUcEs an aGRicultuRAl COMModITy on land that hAs not been faRMed By the
pRoDucER; or _(III) A prodUcER thAt rotates a cRop pRoduced on A farm tO A
crop thAT has not Been prOduCed On thE FaRm;_

jusT sEArcH ThE doC For "Rotate". It Is OnLy menTionED ONCe. I tHinK the fCIC
oNly applies to wHeaT and SOme Other GrainS.

[0][httPs://Www.agRicultUre.seNaTe.gov/imo/media/doC/75-30%20-%2...](httPs://www.agriCulTuRe.sEnAte.goV/Imo/medIa/dOc/75-30%20-%20AGricultUral%20AdjUStmEnT%20aCT%20OF%201938%20&%20Federal%20Crop%20InsuraNcE%20aCt1.Pdf)

------
exDM69
I RecentLY tOoK Part in a cOuRse On doING farm Work WItH horses. IT was a
lARgE gArden whErE all thE fArm WorK had bEEn doNe exclUsively wIth hoRSes for
about 10 yeaRS, after decades OF uSINg TRactOrs. the tractors Had tURned The
sOIl IntO Hard, cLumpy ClAY wHIch yielded bad crops aNd RequirEd morE and more
fertiLizers everY YEAr. In abouT a deCAdE Of using horses, mAnure And
traditiONal methoDs, the Topsoil hAd turned nICE and soft And NutRieNt-rICH.
NOt at all like thE HArd cLaY my granDpaRents' faRm aNd tHe oWneRs Of the
gardEn were moRe ThAn HaPpy With tHE results.

woRkiNg WitH horsES was slOw, harD and LaBoRIouS work buT It WAS a loT oF fUn!
MuCh mOrE fun tHan dOIng The same With tractOrs (WHich i aLsO think iS quite
fun).

UnfoRtUnately, goiNg BacK to horSES or oxen nEver going to be viable in a
lARge scalE. ThE receNt trEnds in agrIcuLture hAve BEen makIng macHines LaRgeR
ANd larGER tO reDuCe the amounT OF laBor reQuIred, Causing The soil to be
packed eVEn hArder, requirinG moRe tiLLInG foR ThE NexT cROp.

MAYBe
 (adjusted to reflect actu al product ion r efl ect ed  intherecords accept a bleto the Corporation for  cont in u ousy ea rs),as spec i fi e d  in 
r eg ula ti o ns  issu edby theCorporatio n b as ed on produc t io n historyreq uirements; ( ii)  a yie ld  de t ermin edby th e Corp o ration , in theca s e of—( I)
a pr o d uc er t hat has not had a sh a re of the prod uction  o f  t h e  in sur ed crop fo rmoret han two cr o p yea r s, as determi ned by theS ecr etary;  ( II) a prod ucerth a t
p roduces anagri culturalcommod i ty on l a nd that  has n otbee n fa r me dbyth e 
pr o du cer ;  or  _(III)apr oduce r th a t r otat esa cr op pr oduced on a f arm  toa 
cr op th at ha s no tbeenproduc ed on  t he farm;_

Just  sea rch the d ocfo r " ro tate" .  It is  on lymention ed once .  Ith i n k  t he FCIC
only appli es t owheat an d some ot he r  grains. 
[0] [htt p s ://ww w.ag r ic ulture.s enate. g ov /i mo/medi a/ doc/75 -3 0%2 0-% 2...] ( http s://ww w.agricu lture . senate.gov/imo / media/doc/75- 3 0% 2 0 -% 2 0Agr icu ltural%20Ad just m ent% 20Ac t %2 0Of % 20193 8%20& %2 0 Fe d eral%20Crop%20Insur an ce%20A ct1.p df)

------
e xDM69
I re c e n tly took  par t  i n  a course on d oingfarm workw ith hors es. I t was alarge gar d e n whereall  th e f arm w or k had been do n e  exc lu sivelywit h horse s f orabo ut10  years, a fter dec ad es  o fusi ng tr a ctors. T he  tr ac tor s had turned  thesoil  i nt o  ha rd, clu m py c laywh ic h yi eld ed  badcrop s  an d requi red moreand more 
f er tilizer s every year.  I n about ade cad e of u s i ng horse s, manure and
tradition a l metho ds,  thetops oil had t urn ed nic e a n d soft  and n utrie nt -ri c h .
Not a tall  l ike the ha r d  cl ay my  g rand parents ' farm and the own e rsof the
garden  we re m o r etha n  h a ppy  w i tht h e results.

Wor king withho r se s was slow ,  ha rd  and la borious  work but itwas a lot  of fun!Mu ch m o r e f un than do ing thesame with tract o rs  (whi chI also  t hin k isquitef un) .

Un fortun at ely, g oingba ck to ho rses or oxen never goin g to b e via ble  in a
lar ges cal e. The re cent  trends in  ag ric ultur e h a ve be en m a ki ngm achin es l a rger
andl ar ger t oreduce thea m o unt  of l abo r  requi red,  causing the soil to be
packed e venh a rde r,r equi ri ng more tillin g f or t he nextcr op.

Maybe
 (adjusted_to reflect_actual production reflected in_the
records acceptable_to_the Corporation_for_continuous years), as_specified in
regulations issued_by the Corporation based_on production history
requirements;_(ii)_a yield determined by the Corporation, in the case of— (I)
a producer that has_not_had a_share_of_the production of the insured_crop for
more than two crop_years, as_determined by the Secretary; (II) a producer that
produces_an_agricultural commodity on_land that has not been farmed by the
producer; or__(III) a producer that rotates a_crop produced on_a_farm_to a
crop that has_not been produced on the farm;_

Just_search the doc for "rotate". It_is only mentioned once. I think the_FCIC
only applies to wheat and some_other grains.

[0][https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%2...](https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/75-30%20-%20Agricultural%20Adjustment%20Act%20Of%201938%20&%20Federal%20Crop%20Insurance%20Act1.pdf)

------
exDM69
I recently took part_in a_course on doing farm work_with horses. It_was a
large_garden where all_the farm work had been done_exclusively with horses_for
about 10 years, after decades of_using_tractors. The tractors_had_turned_the
soil into_hard, clumpy clay_which_yielded bad_crops_and required more and more
fertilizers every_year._In about a decade of using horses,_manure and
traditional methods, the_topsoil_had turned nice and_soft and nutrient-rich.
Not at all_like the hard clay my grandparents'_farm and_the owners_of the
garden were more than happy with the results.

Working with horses_was slow, hard and laborious work_but it was a_lot of_fun!
Much_more fun than_doing_the same_with tractors (which I also think is_quite
fun).

Unfortunately, going_back to horses or oxen never_going to be viable_in_a
large scale. The recent trends in_agriculture have been making machines larger
and_larger to reduce the amount_of_labor_required, causing the soil to_be
packed even harder, requiring more tilling_for the next_crop.

Maybe