
\phi_{20} & =&x_2z^2\\
\phi_{21} &= &y_2z^2
\end{array}$$

At the apex of the cone the vev of each $\phi_{jk}$ is zero, and using the $F$-constraints we find that if we are away from the apex, not all $x_1,y_1,z$ can be zero and not both $x_2,y_2$ can be zero. The base of the cone “vanishes” at the apex, so if we want to consider the base we must require not all $x_1,y_1,z$ be zero and not both $x_2,y_2$ be zero. There is one $F$-constraint between these coordinates, namely $0=\partial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1-b_2a_1$. The resulting locus is then $\{x_2y_1=y_2x_1 \} \subset \mathbb{CP}^2 \times \mathbb{CP}^1$, which is $dP_1$. Thus from the quiver we obtain homogeneous coordinates for $\mathbb{CP}^2\times \mathbb{CP}^1$ that describe the $dP_1$ locus. The notation we have used makes the identification obvious.

Notice that in the quiver theory, the parameterizing variables $x_1,y_1,z,x_2,y_2$ are not homogeneous coordinates, so their rescalings are physical: they change the location of the branes. This is what gives us the cone structure for the total space. Notice also that the gauge invariants $\phi_{ij}$ are cubic in the parameterizing variables, so the moduli space of gauge invariants gives us an embedding into $\mathbb{C}^9$. If we projectivize the embedding, we get the embedding into $\mathbb{CP}^8$ described above. The relations between the monomials $\phi_{ij}$ are exactly the relations of this embedding[^2] since they are determined by the parameterizing variables.

To compute the volumes of interest, consider the divisor $$H := f^{-1}\{ z =0 \},$$ the exceptional divisor $$E := \left[ 0:0:1; x_2: y_2 \right] = \{ \text{a point} \} \times \mathbb{
\phi_{20 } & = & x_2z^2\\ 
 \phi_{21 } & = & y_2z^2 
 \end{array}$$ 

 At the apex of the cone the vev of each $ \phi_{jk}$ is zero, and using the $ F$-constraints we find that if we are away from the vertex, not all $ x_1,y_1,z$ can be zero and not both $ x_2,y_2 $ can be zero. The basis of the cone “ vanishes ” at the apex, so if we want to think the floor we must require not all $ x_1,y_1,z$ be zero and not both $ x_2,y_2 $ be zero. There is one $ F$-constraint between these coordinate, namely $ 0=\partial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1 - b_2a_1$. The resulting locus is then $ \{x_2y_1 = y_2x_1 \ } \subset \mathbb{CP}^2 \times \mathbb{CP}^1 $, which is $ dP_1$. Thus from the frisson we obtain homogeneous coordinates for $ \mathbb{CP}^2\times \mathbb{CP}^1 $ that identify the $ dP_1 $ locus. The notation we have use makes the designation obvious. 

 Notice that in the quiver theory, the parameterizing variables $ x_1,y_1,z, x_2,y_2 $ are not homogeneous coordinate, so their rescalings are physical: they change the location of the branes. This is what yield us the cone structure for the total outer space. Notice besides that the gauge invariants $ \phi_{ij}$ are cubic in the parameterizing variable, so the moduli space of gauge invariant gives us an embedding into $ \mathbb{C}^9$. If we projectivize the embedding, we get the embedding into $ \mathbb{CP}^8 $ described above. The relations between the monomials $ \phi_{ij}$ are exactly the relation of this embedding[^2 ] since they are determine by the parameterizing variables. 

 To compute the volumes of interest, consider the divisor $ $ H: = f^{-1}\ { z = 0 \},$$ the exceptional divisor $ $ vitamin e: = \left [ 0:0:1; x_2: y_2 \right ] = \ { \text{a point } \ } \times \mathbb {

\phi_{20} & =&x_2z^2\\
\phi_{21} &= &y_2z^2
\end{array}$$

At tht apex of the cong rhe vet of eadh $\phi_{jk}$ is zero, and using the $F$-consvraibts wt find that if we afe away fgom the apex, iot all $x_1,y_1,z$ can us zero and nof botk $e_2,y_2$ can be zero. Jhe base of dhe cone “vanisver” ct the apex, so if we want to considew the bssf we must requyre mjt aml $x_1,y_1,z$ be zero and not both $x_2,y_2$ be aero. Thtre is one $F$-constrsint between these coordinwtes, namely $0=\partial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1-b_2a_1$. The rgauleung locus is then $\{x_2y_1=y_2x_1 \} \subset \matgbb{CP}^2 \times \mathbb{CP}^1$, which is $dO_1$. Thux from the qyivft we obtain iomogegeous coordikstes fmr $\mathnb{CP}^2\times \mathnb{CP}^1$ vhat describe the $dP_1$ locuv. The notation we rave used mckes the identificatiin obvimus.

Nmticd thxt jn tge quiger theory, ths parameteruzing variables $x_1,y_1,z,c_2,y_2$ qre not homogsneous cjordinates, so their rescalings are physpcal: they change the locatiin of the branes. This is what dives us the cone structure for the total space. Nmtice xlsi bhat rhf gauge invariants $\phi_{ij}$ are cubic in the parwjeuerpzing variables, sj the modulo dpsse of gauge ivvariaufs gives us an embedfing injo $\matybb{C}^9$. If wt prokectivize the embedding, we tet the embebdibg into $\mathbb{CP}^8$ dzscribed abore. The relayions between the monomnals $\pgi_{ij}$ are exwctly the felations of thir ekbadding[^2] since they are detewmined by the paramegerieing vawiables.

To fompuba the volumes of ijteredt, consider hhe divisor $$H := f^{-1}\{ z =0 \},$$ the exceptmpnal divisor $$E := \lvft[ 0:0:1; x_2: y_2 \xight] = \{ \text{a point} \} \times \mathbb{
\phi_{20} & =&x_2z^2\\ \phi_{21} &= &y_2z^2 \end{array}$$ apex the cone vev of each the we find that we are away the apex, not all $x_1,y_1,z$ can zero and not both $x_2,y_2$ can be zero. The base of the cone at the apex, so if we want to consider the base we must not $x_1,y_1,z$ zero not both $x_2,y_2$ be zero. There is one $F$-constraint between these coordinates, namely $0=\partial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1-b_2a_1$. resulting locus is then $\{x_2y_1=y_2x_1 \} \subset \mathbb{CP}^2 \mathbb{CP}^1$, which is $dP_1$. from the quiver we obtain coordinates $\mathbb{CP}^2\times \mathbb{CP}^1$ describe $dP_1$ The notation we used makes the identification obvious. Notice that in the quiver theory, the parameterizing variables $x_1,y_1,z,x_2,y_2$ are not coordinates, so are physical: change location the branes. This gives us the cone structure for Notice also that the gauge invariants $\phi_{ij}$ are in the variables, so the moduli space of invariants gives us an embedding into $\mathbb{C}^9$. If projectivize the embedding, we get the embedding into $\mathbb{CP}^8$ described above. The relations between the are exactly the relations this embedding[^2] since are by parameterizing To compute volumes of interest, consider the divisor $$H := f^{-1}\{ z =0 the exceptional divisor $$E := \left[ 0:0:1; x_2: y_2 \right] \text{a \} \times \mathbb{

\phi_{20} & =&x_2z^2\\
\phi_{21} &= &y_2z^2
\end{array}$$

At the apEx of the conE the vEv oF eaCh $\Phi_{jK}$ is zEro, and using the $f$-ConsTraints we find that if we aRe awaY fROm thE ApEx, not All $x_1,y_1,z$ cAN bE ZEro AnD nOt bOtH $X_2,y_2$ Can be ZerO. The basE of the cone “VanIsHes” at the apex, SO iF we want to cOnsIder the base wE muSt requIrE noT All $x_1,y_1,Z$ be Zero aNd not bOTh $x_2,y_2$ be Zero. There Is ONe $F$-conSTraint bETWeEn thEse coordinates, namELy $0=\PArtial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1-b_2a_1$. ThE resulTiNG lOCUs iS thEn $\{x_2y_1=y_2x_1 \} \subsEt \MathbB{cP}^2 \times \MAtHBB{cP}^1$, wHIch is $dP_1$. Thus frOm the quiver WE obTain hoMoGenEOus cooRdinaTeS For $\Mathbb{CP}^2\timEs \maThbb{CP}^1$ thaT descrIBe the $dP_1$ LOcus. The NotatiOn wE haVe usED mAkEs tHe IDenTIfIcaTIon Obvious.

NOtIcE that In thE QUIVer tHeoRy, thE paraMeterizing varIabLes $x_1,Y_1,Z,x_2,y_2$ Are noT homoGeneOuS coorDinateS, so thEiR rescalings are pHysiCal: they chAngE tHe lOcAtion OF the brAneS. ThIs is whaT gives uS The CoNE STrUcture for the total sPaCE. noTice also That thE GaUgE InvarianTs $\Phi_{Ij}$ arE CUbic iN the PArAmeterizIng varIAbLeS, so the mOdUli spaCe Of gAugE invaRIantS gives Us an embeDding INto $\mathbb{C}^9$. If we PRojectivize thE EmBEDdINg, we Get The embeddinG intO $\MathBb{CP}^8$ DEsCriBEd aboVe. The ReLAtIOns between the monomiAlS $\phi_{ij}$ Are exActly the relatIons of this EMBEdding[^2] siNce tHEy ARe determined by The paRameteriziNG variablEs.

To cOmpute thE volumes oF INterest, cOnsIdeR thE diVISoR $$H := f^{-1}\{ z =0 \},$$ the exceptIONal dIvIsor $$E := \leFt[ 0:0:1; x_2: Y_2 \right] = \{ \tExt{A poInt} \} \TimEs \Mathbb{

\phi_{20} & =&x_2z^2\\
\p hi_{21} &=  &y_2 z^2 
\e nd {arr ay}$ $

At the apex of t he cone the vev of eac h $\p hi _ {jk} $  i s zer o, andu si n g  th e$F $-c on s tr aints  we  find t hat if weare  a way from the ap ex, not al l $ x_1,y_1,z$ c anbe zer oand not b oth  $x_2 ,y_2$c an bezero. The  b a se oft he cone “ va nish es” at the apex,s oi f we want to c onside rt he b ase  we  must requ ir e not all $x_ 1 ,y _ 1 , z$b e zero and no t both $x_2 , y_2 $ be z er o.T here i s one  $ F $-c onstraint b etwe en thesecoordi n ates, n a mely $0 =\part ial _{c _3}W =a_ 2b_ 1- b _2a _ 1$ . T h e r esulting  l oc us is  the n $ \ {x_2 y_1 =y_2 x_1 \ } \subset \ma thb b{CP } ^2\time s \ma thbb {C P}^1$ , whic h is$d P_1$. Thus from  the  quiver w e o bt ain  h omoge n eous c oor din ates fo r $\mat h bb{ CP } ^ 2 \t imes \mathbb{CP}^1 $t h at  describ e the$ dP _1 $  locus.Th e n otat i o n wehave us ed makes  the i d en ti ficatio nobviou s. 

N oti ce th a t in  the q uiver th eory, the parameteri z ing variables $x _ 1 ,y _ 1,z, x_2 ,y_2$ are n ot h o moge neou s  c oor d inate s, so  t h ei r  rescalings are phy si cal: t hey c hange the loc ation of t h e branes.This is what gives usthe c one struct u re for t he to tal spac e. Notice a lso that  th e g aug e i n v ar iants $\phi_{ i j }$ a re  cubicinthe par ame ter izi ngva riables,so the m od ul isp ace  of g a uge inva ri ant sgiv es us an emb eddin g in to  $ \ mat hbb{C}^ 9 $. I f we  p ro ject ivi ze  theembe d din g, we g et the em bed d ingin to  $\math bb{CP}^8$ des cr ibed above .The  relat i o ns betwe en the monomials $\phi_ { ij}$ ar e e xactl y th e relatio nsof thi s e m beddin g[^2]since  t hey a re de t e rm ine dby the par a m ete rizin gvari ables.
To compute the vo l ume s of interest , c onsi d e rthe di v iso r$ $H: =  f^{-1}\{ z =0\},$$ theex c ep tional div i sor  $ $E := \ left[ 0 :0:1; x_2: y_ 2 \right]  = \{ \te xt {a p o i nt}  \} \times  \mathbb {

\phi_{20} &_=&x_2z^2\\
\phi_{21} &=_&y_2z^2
\end{array}$$

At the apex of_the cone_the_vev of_each_$\phi_{jk}$ is zero,_and using the_$F$-constraints we find that_if we are_away_from the apex, not all $x_1,y_1,z$ can be zero and not both $x_2,y_2$ can_be_zero. The_base_of_the cone “vanishes” at the_apex, so if we want_to consider_the base we must require not all $x_1,y_1,z$_be_zero and not_both $x_2,y_2$ be zero. There is one $F$-constraint between_these coordinates, namely $0=\partial_{c_3}W = a_2b_1-b_2a_1$._The resulting locus_is_then_$\{x_2y_1=y_2x_1 \} \subset \mathbb{CP}^2_\times \mathbb{CP}^1$, which is $dP_1$. Thus_from the quiver we obtain homogeneous_coordinates for $\mathbb{CP}^2\times \mathbb{CP}^1$ that describe the_$dP_1$ locus. The notation we have_used makes the identification obvious.

Notice_that in_the quiver theory, the parameterizing_variables $x_1,y_1,z,x_2,y_2$ are_not homogeneous_coordinates, so their_rescalings are physical: they change the_location of the_branes. This is what gives us_the_cone structure for_the_total_space. Notice_also that the_gauge_invariants $\phi_{ij}$_are_cubic in the parameterizing variables, so_the_moduli space of gauge invariants gives us_an embedding into $\mathbb{C}^9$._If_we projectivize the embedding,_we get the embedding into_$\mathbb{CP}^8$ described above. The relations between_the monomials_$\phi_{ij}$ are_exactly the relations of this embedding[^2] since they are determined by_the parameterizing variables.

To compute the volumes_of interest, consider the_divisor $$H_:=_f^{-1}\{ z =0_\},$$_the exceptional_divisor $$E := \left[ 0:0:1; x_2: y_2_\right] =_\{ \text{a point} \} \times \mathbb{