ova explosion in an arbitrary region of the interstellar medium. Rather, the blast wave propagates through a medium that the progenitor star has processed. Several characteristics imply a massive progenitor, the sort most capable of modifying the surrounding ISM, which Charles et al. (1985) and Levenson et al. (1997) discuss. One strong piece of evidence is the paradoxical morphology of the Cygnus Loop. At optical and X-ray wavelengths, it appears to be nearly circular, yet it exhibits tremendous structure on smaller scales. The optical data alone could be interpreted as a SNR in transition from the adiabatic to the radiative phase, but the presence and correlation of X-rays require that overall the blast wave still has (or until very recently had) a high velocity, $v_s \gtrsim 400 {\rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$. A model of blast wave interaction with large clouds accounts for this correlation ([@HesCox]; [@Gra95]; [@Lev96]), but such large clouds cannot be typical of the pre-supernova interstellar medium. If they were, the SNR would not appear so circular, and X-ray emission due to clouds evaporating in the interior would be observed. Thus, although large clouds are found around the periphery of the Cygnus Loop, they were not located within the current blast wave prior to the supernova event. This structure is expected in the vicinity of an O or B star. During its main-sequence lifetime, such a massive star homogenizes the surrounding ISM, creating a uniform region at constant density, temperature, and pressure. The star’s UV emission removes clumps of denser gas within the H II region, either destroying the clouds through photoevaporation or relocating them to the exterior by the rocket effect ([@McK84]). The result is a homogeneous spherical region surrounded by dense clouds. A star of type earlier than B0 will clear a cavity with a radius of about 50 pc (McKee et al. 1984 ). The Cygnus Loop cavity is smaller, so its progenitor must be a later-type star ([@Cha85]), yet one still able to create the photoionized cavity. Thus, we suggest that a B0, $M\approx 15M_{\sun}$ star was the progenitor of the Cygnus Loop.

The observer’s line of sight through shocked clouds at the projected edge is preferentially longer than through those that appear at the projected center. Photoevaporation of clouds progresses radially outward from the central star,
ova explosion in an arbitrary region of the interstellar medium. Rather, the good time wave propagate through a medium that the progenitor star has processed. respective characteristics imply a massive progenitor, the sort most adequate to of modifying the surrounding ISM, which Charles et al. (1985) and Levenson et al. (1997) discourse. One strong piece of evidence is the paradoxical morphology of the Cygnus Loop. At ocular and X - ray wavelength, it appear to be nearly circular, yet it exhibits tremendous structure on modest scales. The optical data entirely could be interpreted as a SNR in transition from the adiabatic to the radiative phase, but the bearing and correlation of adam - rays want that overall the blast wave still has (or until very recently give birth) a high velocity, $ v_s \gtrsim 400 { \rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$. A model of blast wave interaction with large cloud account for this correlation ([ @HesCox ]; [ @Gra95 ]; [ @Lev96 ]), but such large clouds cannot be typical of the pre - supernova interstellar medium. If they were, the SNR would not appear so circular, and ten - ray emission due to cloud melt in the interior would be observed. therefore, although large cloud are found around the periphery of the Cygnus Loop, they were not located within the current good time wave prior to the supernova event. This structure is expected in the vicinity of an O or B star. During its main - sequence lifetime, such a massive star homogenizes the besiege ISM, creating a consistent region at constant density, temperature, and pressure. The star ’s ultraviolet emission removes clumps of denser gas within the H   II region, either destroying the clouds through photoevaporation or relocating them to the exterior by the skyrocket effect ([ @McK84 ]). The result is a homogeneous spherical region surrounded by dense cloud. A star of character earlier than B0 will clear a cavity with a radius of approximately 50 pc (McKee et al. 1984). The Cygnus Loop cavity is smaller, so its progenitor must be a late - type star topology ([ @Cha85 ]), yet one still able to create the photoionized cavity. Thus, we suggest that a B0, $ M\approx 15M_{\sun}$ star was the progenitor of the Cygnus Loop. 

 The observer ’s line of sight through shocked cloud at the projected edge is preferentially long than through those that appear at the projected center. Photoevaporation of clouds progresses radially outward from the central star,
ova explosion in an arbitravy region of the intersvellar jedium. Rxther, the blast wave propagaves rhrouth a medium that the pfogenitor star haw prixessed. Sevxdal chavccterjdticv imply a massiye progenitmr, the sort movt ccpable of modifying the surrounding YSM, whivh Charles et al. (1985) anc Levsnson et al. (1997) discuss. One strong pisce of tvidence is the patadoxical morphology of thf Cyhnus Loop. At opticwl and X-ray wavqoengths, it aopears to be nearly citcular, yet it exhibits tremendour strbcture on snaoleg scales. The optibal data alonc could be intrrpreted as a XNR in transition from the ediabatic to the radyative phdsz, but the presence ane xorrenatimn ow X-rxys rxqujre thwt kverall ths blast wavw still has (or untik dvty recently gad) a ridh velocity, $v_s \gtrsim 400 {\rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$. A moden or blast wave interactiob with large clouds afcounts fjr this correlation ([@HesCox]; [@Gra95]; [@Lev96]), but such large clouvs caukjg bf typical of the pre-supernova interstellar meqjuk. Pf they were, the FNR would npt alkear so circulxr, and X-rzy emission due to clouds evapirating ig thr interior would be observee. Thus, altholgh oarge clouds are flund around the perilhery of the Cygnus Loo', they were not llcated wiffin the current claxt wave prior to the supernoda event. Vhis xtructufe ix expested in thf vicltity of an O or B dtar. Burinc its main-dequence lifetime, such a massivx star homogemises the surxoundikg ISM, creating a uniform regnon at cjnstavt density, tempereture, and prqssure. The stdt’s UV emissioi removes clunps if densdf gas within tne H II reynon, eithee destroying the ckouaa through photozrakoeation or relovatkng tjek em the exterimr bh tfr rocyet efftet ([@NzK84]). Tne result is a homoganeohs spherical regiom furroundgd by denfe clouds. A syar of type earlieg thai B0 wiul clrar a cavity with a radius of aboht 50 pc (McNee et al. 1984 ). The Cygkus Joop cavitv is smaller, so its progenitor must be a later-type star ([@Chq85]), yet one still ablg tp create thx photjionized wavity. Thus, we suggewt that a B0, $M\apprpx 15M_{\sun}$ star was the lrogenhtor lf the Cygnus Loop.

The observer’s line of sight through shocked clouds at tye prooested edge ia prrferettnalky londer vhen through those nhat appear at the projected cenver. Photoeea'oration of clouds progresses rxdially outwatd from the central star,
ova explosion in an arbitrary region of medium. the blast propagates through a has Several characteristics imply massive progenitor, the most capable of modifying the surrounding which Charles et al. (1985) and Levenson et al. (1997) discuss. One strong of evidence is the paradoxical morphology of the Cygnus Loop. At optical and wavelengths, appears be circular, yet it exhibits tremendous structure on smaller scales. The optical data alone could be interpreted a SNR in transition from the adiabatic to radiative phase, but the and correlation of X-rays require overall blast wave has until recently had) a velocity, $v_s \gtrsim 400 {\rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$. A model of blast wave interaction with large accounts for ([@HesCox]; [@Gra95]; but large cannot be typical pre-supernova interstellar medium. If they were, not appear so circular, and X-ray emission due clouds evaporating the interior would be observed. Thus, large clouds are found around the periphery of Cygnus Loop, they were not located within the current blast wave prior to the supernova structure is expected in vicinity of an or star. its lifetime, such massive star homogenizes the surrounding ISM, creating a uniform region at density, temperature, and pressure. The star’s UV emission removes clumps gas the H II either destroying the clouds photoevaporation relocating them to the the effect is homogeneous region surrounded by dense A star of type earlier B0 will clear a about 50 pc (McKee et al. 1984 ). Cygnus Loop cavity is smaller, so its must be a later-type star ([@Cha85]), yet one still able to create photoionized cavity. suggest that a B0, $M\approx 15M_{\sun}$ star was progenitor of the Cygnus The observer’s line of sight through shocked clouds at projected is preferentially than through those appear at the center. Photoevaporation of radially outward the star,
ova explosion in an arbitrary Region of thE inteRstEllAr MediUm. RaTher, the blast waVE proPagates through a medium tHat thE pROgenIToR star Has procESsED. sevErAl ChaRaCTeRistiCs iMply a maSsive progeNitOr, The sort most cAPaBle of modifYinG the surroundIng iSM, whiCh chaRLes et Al. (1985) aNd LevEnson eT Al. (1997) discUss. One strOnG Piece oF EvidencE IS tHe paRadoxical morpholoGY oF The Cygnus Loop. AT opticAl ANd x-RAy wAveLengths, it aPpEars tO Be nearlY CiRCULar, YEt it exhibits tRemendous stRUctUre on sMaLleR Scales. the opTiCAl dAta alone couLd be InterpretEd as a Snr in tranSItion frOm the aDiaBatIc to THe RaDiaTiVE phASe, But THe pResence aNd CoRrelaTion OF x-RAys rEquIre tHat ovErall the blast WavE stiLL haS (or unTil veRy reCeNtly hAd) a higH veloCiTy, $v_s \gtrsim 400 {\rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$. a modEl of blast WavE iNteRaCtion WIth larGe cLouDs accouNts for tHIs cOrRELAtIon ([@HesCox]; [@Gra95]; [@Lev96]), but SuCH LaRge cloudS cannoT Be TyPIcal of thE pRe-sUperNOVa intErstELlAr medium. if they WErE, tHe SNR woUlD not apPeAr sO ciRculaR, And X-Ray emiSsion due To cloUDs evaporating iN The interior woULd BE ObSErveD. ThUs, although lArge CLoudS are FOuNd aROund tHe perIpHErY Of the Cygnus Loop, they WeRe not lOcateD within the curRent blast wAVE Prior to tHe suPErNOva event. This stRuctuRe is expectED in the viCinitY of an O or b star. DuriNG Its main-sEquEncE liFetIME, sUch a massive stAR HomoGeNizes thE suRroundiNg IsM, cReaTinG a Uniform reGion at coNsTaNt DeNsiTy, temPErature, aNd PreSsUre. the stAR’s UV emIssioN remOvEs CLumPs of denSEr GAS witHiN tHe H Ii reGiOn, eitHer dEStrOying thE clouds thRouGH phoToEvAporatiOn or relocatinG tHem to the exTeRioR by the ROCket effeCt ([@McK84]). The result is a homogeNEous sphEriCal reGion SurroundeD by Dense cLouDS. A star Of type EarliEr ThaN b0 Will cLEAr A caViTy with a radIUS of About 50 Pc (mcKeE et al. 1984 ). ThE Cygnus Loop cavity iS SmaLler, so its progEniTor mUST bE a lATeR-TypE sTAr ([@CHA85]), Yet one still able To create thE pHOtOionized caVIty. thUs, we sugGest thaT a B0, $M\aPProx 15M_{\suN}$ star was tHe progeniToR of tHE cygNus Loop.

The Observer’S line of siGHt thrOUgH shocKed Clouds At The ProjeCted edGE is PrefeRentiaLlY longeR than ThRough thoSe that appear at the projecTed cenTer. PhOtoEvaporatiOn oF CloUds progreSses Radially ouTwaRd fRom thE ceNTral sTar,
ova explosion in an arbitr ary region  of t heint er stel larmedium. Rather ,  the  blast wave propagates  thro ug h  a m e di um th at thep ro g e nit or  s tar  h a sproce sse d. Seve ral charac ter is tics imply a ma ssive prog eni tor, the sor t m ost ca pa ble of mo dif yingthe su r roundi ng ISM, w hi c h Char l es et a l .  ( 1985 ) and Levenson et al .  (1997) discus s. One  s t ro n g  pi ece  of eviden ce  is t h e parad o xi c a l  mo r phology of th e Cygnus Lo o p.At opt ic ala nd X-r ay wa ve l eng ths, it app ears  to be ne arly c i rcular, yet itexhibi tstre mend o us  s tru ct u reo nsma l ler  scales.  T he  opti cald a t a  alo necoul d beinterpreted a s a  SNR intrans ition  fro mthe a diabat ic to  t he radiative ph ase,  but thepre se nce  a nd co r relati onofX-raysrequire tha to v e ra ll the blast wavest i l lhas (oruntilv er yr ecentlyha d)a hi g h  velo city ,  $ v_s \gtr sim 40 0  { \r m \ km\s^{-1} }$ . A  mo del o f  bla st wav e intera ction with large clo u ds accounts f o rt h is corr ela tion ([@Hes Cox] ;  [@G ra95 ] ;[@L e v96]) , but  s u ch large clouds cannot  b e typi cal o f the pre-sup ernova int e r s tellar m ediu m .I f they were, t he SN R would no t  appearso ci rcular,and X-ray e missiondue  to  cl oud s ev aporating int h e in te rior wo uld  be obs erv ed.  Th us,  a lthough l arge clo ud sar efou nd ar o und thepe rip he ryof th e  Cygnu s Loo p, t he yw ere  not lo c at e d  wit hi nthecur re nt bl astw ave  priorto the su per n ovaev en t. This  structure is  e xpected in  t hevicini t y  of an O  or B star. During itsm ain-seq uen ce li feti me, sucha m assive  st a r homo genize s the  s urr o u nding I SM , c re ating a un i f orm  regi on  atconstan t density, tempera t ure , and pressur e.Thes t ar ’sU Ve mis si o n r e m oves clumps ofdenser gas  w i th in the H I I  re gi on, eit her des troyi n g the c louds thr ough phot oe vapo r a tio n or reloc ating th em to the exter i or  by t herocket  e ffe ct ([ @McK84 ] ).The r esultis  a hom ogene ou s spheri cal region surrounded b y dens e clo uds . A staroft ype  earlierthan  B0 will c lea r a  cavi tyw ith a  rad i us  of about  50p c (McKeee tal. 1 98 4 ). The Cy g n u s L oop c avi t y is s mall er, so its progen i tor must be alate r - typ e s t ar ( [@ Cha85]), yet o nest i l l able t ocreate thephotoion iz e d cav ity. T hus, w e sugge s t  t h at a B 0, $ M\a pprox 15M _{\ su n }$ star  w as the pr ogen it or ofthe Cy g nusL o op.

The observe r’s l i n e ofs igh t thr ou gh shoc k ed c louds at t he projecte d edge  isprefe rential ly  longe r t ha n throught hose that  appe ar at t he  pro jec ted ce nter . Photo evap or ati on of clo u d sp ro gr e sse s ra diall youtw ard fromt he centr als tar,
ova explosion_in an_arbitrary region of the_interstellar medium._Rather,_the blast_wave_propagates through a_medium that the_progenitor star has processed._Several characteristics imply_a_massive progenitor, the sort most capable of modifying the surrounding ISM, which Charles et_al._(1985) and_Levenson_et_al. (1997) discuss. One strong_piece of evidence is the_paradoxical morphology_of the Cygnus Loop. At optical and X-ray_wavelengths,_it appears to_be nearly circular, yet it exhibits tremendous structure on_smaller scales. The optical data alone_could be interpreted_as_a_SNR in transition from_the adiabatic to the radiative phase,_but the presence and correlation of_X-rays require that overall the blast wave_still has (or until very recently_had) a high velocity, $v_s_\gtrsim 400_{\rm \ km \ s^{-1}}$._A model of_blast wave_interaction with large_clouds accounts for this correlation ([@HesCox];_[@Gra95]; [@Lev96]), but_such large clouds cannot be typical_of_the pre-supernova interstellar_medium._If_they were,_the SNR would_not_appear so_circular,_and X-ray emission due to clouds_evaporating_in the interior would be observed. Thus,_although large clouds are_found_around the periphery of_the Cygnus Loop, they were_not located within the current blast_wave prior_to the_supernova event. This structure is expected in the vicinity of an_O or B star. During its_main-sequence lifetime, such a_massive star_homogenizes_the surrounding ISM,_creating_a uniform_region at constant density, temperature, and pressure._The star’s_UV emission removes clumps of denser_gas within the H II_region,_either destroying the clouds through photoevaporation_or relocating them to the exterior_by the rocket effect ([@McK84])._The_result_is a homogeneous spherical region_surrounded by dense clouds. A star_of type earlier_than B0 will clear a cavity with_a_radius of about 50 pc (McKee_et_al. 1984 ). The Cygnus Loop_cavity_is_smaller, so its progenitor must_be a later-type star ([@Cha85]), yet_one still able to create the photoionized cavity. Thus,_we suggest that_a B0, $M\approx 15M_{\sun}$ star_was_the_progenitor of the Cygnus Loop.

The observer’s line of sight through_shocked clouds_at the projected_edge is preferentially longer than through those that appear at_the projected center. Photoevaporation of clouds progresses_radially outward from the central star,