 for the dimensionless Hall constant $\epsilon$ can be derived. For this purpose we exclude $\nu_{i}^{-}$ from [Eqs.]{} (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), for $\nu_{a}^{-}$ use [Eq.]{} (\[F17\]); and after some algebra in the limit $\epsilon\cdot\tan\alpha<<1$ we have: $$\label{F27}n\epsilon=\frac{2\rho_{\perp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\parallel}^{+}+\rho_{f}\sin2\alpha(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\parallel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\rho_{\parallel}^{+}-\sin2\alpha\cdot\rho_{f}\nu_{i}F_{Ly}\nu_{a}^{'}]\rho_{f}\nu_{i}^{2}}.$$

It is easy to check that from [Eq.]{} (\[F27\]) follows scaling relations $\delta=n\epsilon/\rho_{f}=\rho_{\perp
i}/(\rho_{\parallel i})^2$ (for $i$-pins at $\nu_a=1$) and [Eq.]{} (\[F20\]) (for $a$-pins at $\nu_i=1$)

As it follows from Eqs. (25) and (27), just the same “scaling” relations as given by Eqs. (22) and (23) for *a*-pins, exist also for (*i*+*a*)-pins (with a replacement of corresponding *a*-resistivities in Eq. (8) by $\rho_f\rho_{\perp}^{-}$ and $\rho_f\rho_{\parallel}^{+}$). Physically it follows from the fact that point-like disorder does not change the angular dependence of the ratio $\rho_{\perp
a}^{+}/\rho_{\parallel a}^{+}$, which determines the angle $\beta$ between $\mathbf{j}$ and average velocity vector $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$ for $a$-pins$^{11}$, and influences only the magnitude of $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$$^{16}$.

Grafical analysis of nonlinear regimes.
=======================================

Pinning potential and $\nu$-function behavior.
----------------------------------------------

In order to analyze different types of nonlinear anisotropic $(j, \theta,
\alpha)$-dependent magnetoresistivity responses, given by formulas (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), we should bear in mind that these responses, as is seen from formula
for the dimensionless Hall constant $ \epsilon$ can be derived. For this purpose we exclude $ \nu_{i}^{-}$ from [ Eqs. ] { } (\[F22\])-(\[F24\ ]), for $ \nu_{a}^{-}$ habit [ Eq. ] { }   (\[F17\ ]); and after some algebra in the terminus ad quem $ \epsilon\cdot\tan\alpha<<1 $ we have: $ $ \label{F27}n\epsilon=\frac{2\rho_{\perp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\parallel}^{+}+\rho_{f}\sin2\alpha(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\parallel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\rho_{\parallel}^{+}-\sin2\alpha\cdot\rho_{f}\nu_{i}F_{Ly}\nu_{a}^{'}]\rho_{f}\nu_{i}^{2}}.$$ 

 It is easy to match that from [ Eq. ] { }   (\[F27\ ]) postdate scaling relations $ \delta = n\epsilon/\rho_{f}=\rho_{\perp 
 i}/(\rho_{\parallel i})^2 $ (for $ i$-pins at $ \nu_a=1 $) and [ Eq. ] { }   (\[F20\ ]) (for $ a$-pins at $ \nu_i=1 $) 

 As it surveil from Eqs. (25) and (27), just the same “ scale ” relations as given by Eqs. (22) and (23) for * a*-pins, exist besides for (* i*+*a*)-pins (with a replacement of corresponding * a*-resistivities in Eq. (8) by $ \rho_f\rho_{\perp}^{-}$ and $ \rho_f\rho_{\parallel}^{+}$). Physically it follows from the fact that point - alike disorder does not change the angular dependence of the ratio $ \rho_{\perp 
 a}^{+}/\rho_{\parallel a}^{+}$, which determines the slant $ \beta$ between $ \mathbf{j}$ and average velocity vector $ \langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$ for $ a$-pins$^{11}$, and influences entirely the magnitude of $ \langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$$^{16}$. 

 Grafical analysis of nonlinear government. 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Pinning likely and $ \nu$-function behavior. 
 ---------------------------------------------- 

 In club to analyze different types of nonlinear anisotropic $ (j, \theta, 
 \alpha)$-dependent magnetoresistivity response, given by formulas (\[F22\])-(\[F24\ ]), we should bear in mind that these responses, as is seen from formula
 fog the dimensionless Hall constant $\epsilon$ can ue deribed. For ghis purpose we exclude $\nu_{i}^{-}$ hrom [Eqs.]{} (\[D22\])-(\[F24\]), for $\nu_{a}^{-}$ use [Eq.]{} (\[F17\]); and after sole algebea ii the limit $\epsilon\cdot\tan\alphz<<1$ we kate: $$\label{F27}n\epsilpn=\frac{2\rho_{\parp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\paranldl}^{+}+\xho_{f}\sin2\alpha(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\parallel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\rho_{\pwrallel}^{+}-\xij2\alpha\cdot\rho_{f}\gu_{i}F_{Kr}\nu_{a}^{'}]\dho_{f}\nu_{i}^{2}}.$$

It is easy to check that frkm [Eq.]{} (\[F27\]) hollows scaling relations $\delta=n\epsilon/\rhl_{f}=\rhl_{\perp
i}/(\rho_{\parallel l})^2$ (for $i$-pins at $\gy_a=1$) and [Eq.]{} (\[F20\]) (fur $a$-pins au $\uu_i=1$)

As it fomlows from Eqs. (25) and (27), just the sxme “sealing” relajnins ds given by Eqs. (22) and (23) for *a*-plms, exivt also for (*i*+*a*)-pins (wibh a ceplqcement of correspondmng *a*-resistivities ig Eq. (8) by $\shk_f\rho_{\perp}^{-}$ and $\rho_d\ryo_{\pardllen}^{+}$). Phhwicxllg mt rollowd fcom the facf that poinr-like disorder does njn change the zngulaw qependence of the ratio $\rho_{\perp
a}^{+}/\rho_{\paranlem a}^{+}$, which determines thw angle $\beta$ between $\lathbf{j}$ agd average velocity vector $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$ fos $a$-piis$^{11}$, anb infljwnfes only the magnitude of $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$$^{16}$.

Ddagibal analysis of njnlinear rebilex.
=======================================

Kinning potentkal anb $\nh$-function behavior.
----------------------------------------------

Ln ordet to abalyze disferrnt types of nonlinear anisitropic $(j, \thvta,
\aopha)$-dependent magnztoresistivicy reskonses, given by formulas (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), wz shoumd bear in lind that ghese responses, xs ps saen from formula
for the dimensionless Hall constant $\epsilon$ can For purpose we $\nu_{i}^{-}$ from [Eqs.]{} (\[F17\]); after some algebra the limit $\epsilon\cdot\tan\alpha<<1$ have: $$\label{F27}n\epsilon=\frac{2\rho_{\perp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\parallel}^{+}+\rho_{f}\sin2\alpha(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\parallel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\rho_{\parallel}^{+}-\sin2\alpha\cdot\rho_{f}\nu_{i}F_{Ly}\nu_{a}^{'}]\rho_{f}\nu_{i}^{2}}.$$ It is easy to that from [Eq.]{} (\[F27\]) follows scaling relations $\delta=n\epsilon/\rho_{f}=\rho_{\perp i}/(\rho_{\parallel i})^2$ (for $i$-pins at and [Eq.]{} (\[F20\]) (for $a$-pins at $\nu_i=1$) As it follows from Eqs. (25) (27), the “scaling” as given by Eqs. (22) and (23) for *a*-pins, exist also for (*i*+*a*)-pins (with a replacement corresponding *a*-resistivities in Eq. (8) by $\rho_f\rho_{\perp}^{-}$ and Physically it follows from fact that point-like disorder does change angular dependence the $\rho_{\perp a}^{+}$, which determines angle $\beta$ between $\mathbf{j}$ and average velocity vector $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$ for $a$-pins$^{11}$, and influences only the magnitude of Grafical analysis regimes. ======================================= potential $\nu$-function ---------------------------------------------- In order different types of nonlinear anisotropic $(j, responses, given by formulas (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), we should bear mind that responses, as is seen from formula
 for the dimensionless Hall coNstant $\epsiLon$ caN be DerIvEd. FoR thiS purpose we exclUDe $\nu_{I}^{-}$ from [Eqs.]{} (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), for $\nu_{a}^{-}$ use [Eq.]{} (\[F17\]); And afTeR Some ALgEbra iN the limIT $\ePSIloN\cDoT\taN\aLPhA<<1$ we haVe: $$\lAbel{F27}n\ePsilon=\frac{2\Rho_{\PeRp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\parALlEl}^{+}+\rho_{f}\sin2\aLphA(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\paRalLel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\RhO_{\paRAllel}^{+}-\Sin2\Alpha\Cdot\rhO_{F}\nu_{i}F_{LY}\nu_{a}^{'}]\rho_{f}\nU_{i}^{2}}.$$

iT is easY To check THAt From [eq.]{} (\[F27\]) follows scaling RElATions $\delta=n\epsIlon/\rhO_{f}=\RHo_{\PERp
i}/(\Rho_{\Parallel i})^2$ (fOr $I$-pins AT $\nu_a=1$) and [eQ.]{} (\[F20\]) (FOR $A$-piNS at $\nu_i=1$)

As it folLows from Eqs. (25) ANd (27), jUst the SaMe “sCAling” rElatiOnS As gIven by Eqs. (22) anD (23) for *A*-pins, exisT also fOR (*i*+*a*)-pins (WIth a repLacemeNt oF coRresPOnDiNg *a*-ReSIstIViTieS In EQ. (8) by $\rho_f\rHo_{\PeRp}^{-}$ and $\Rho_f\RHO_{\PAralLel}^{+}$). physIcallY it follows froM thE facT ThaT poinT-like DisoRdEr doeS not chAnge tHe Angular dependenCe of The ratio $\rHo_{\pErP
a}^{+}/\rHo_{\ParalLEl a}^{+}$, whiCh dEteRmines tHe angle $\BEta$ BeTWEEn $\Mathbf{j}$ and average vElOCItY vector $\lAngle\mAThBf{V}\Rangle$ foR $a$-PinS$^{11}$, and INFluenCes oNLy The magniTude of $\LAnGlE\mathbf{V}\rAngle$$^{16}$.

GRaFicAl aNalysIS of nOnlineAr regimeS.
=======================================

PinnINg potential and $\NU$-function behaVIoR.
----------------------------------------------

iN oRDer tO anAlyze differEnt tYPes oF nonLInEar ANisotRopic $(J, \tHEtA,
\Alpha)$-dependent magneToResistIvity Responses, giveN by formulaS (\[f22\])-(\[f24\]), We should Bear IN mINd that these resPonseS, as is seen fROm formulA
 for the dimensionless Hal l constant  $\ep sil on$  c an b e de rived. For thi s  pur pose we exclude $\nu_{ i}^{- }$ from [E qs.]{ } (\[F2 2 \] ) - (\[ F2 4\ ]),  f o r$\nu_ {a} ^{-}$ u se [Eq.]{}  (\ [F 17\]); and a f te r some alg ebr a in the lim it$\epsi lo n\c d ot\ta n\a lpha< <1$ we have:$$\label{ F2 7 }n\eps i lon=\fr a c {2 \rho _{\perp}^{-}\cdot \ rh o _{\parallel}^{ +}+\rh o_ { f} \ s in2 \al pha(1-\nu_ {a })\nu _ {i}\rho _ {\ p a r all e l}^{-}}{[2\nu _{a}\rho_{\ p ara llel}^ {+ }-\ s in2\al pha\c do t \rh o_{f}\nu_{i }F_{ Ly}\nu_{a }^{'}] \ rho_{f} \ nu_{i}^ {2}}.$ $
Itis e a sy  t o c he c k t h at  fr o m [ Eq.]{} ( \[ F2 7\])foll o w s scal ing  rel ation s $\delta=n\e psi lon/ \ rho _{f}= \rho_ {\pe rp 
i}/( \rho_{ \para ll el i})^2$ (for$i$- pins at $ \nu _a =1$ )and [ E q.]{}(\[ F20 \]) (fo r $a$-p i nsat $ \ nu _i=1$)

As it foll ow s fr om Eqs.(25) a n d(2 7 ), justth e s ame“ s calin g” r e la tions as  given by  E qs. (22 )and (2 3)  fo r * a*-pi n s, e xist a lso for(*i*+ * a*)-pins (with a replacement of c or r espo ndi ng *a*-resi stiv i ties  inE q.  (8 )  by $ \rho_ f\ r ho _ {\perp}^{-}$ and $\ rh o_f\rh o_{\p arallel}^{+}$ ). Physica l l y  it foll owsf ro m  the fact that  poin t-like dis o rder doe s not  changethe angul a r  depende nce  of  th e r a t io  $\rho_{\perp a }^{+ }/ \rho_{\ par allel a }^{ +}$ , w hic hdetermine s the an gl e$\ be ta$  betw e en $\mat hb f{j }$  an d ave r age ve locit y ve ct or $\l angle\m a th b f {v}\ ra ng le$for  $ a$-pi ns$^ { 11} $, andinfluence s o n ly t he  m agnitud e of $\langle \m athbf{v}\r an gle $$^{16 } $ .

Grafi cal analysis of nonline a r regim es. 
==== ==== ========= === ====== === = ====== ===

P innin gpot e n tiala n d$\n u$ -functionb e hav ior.-- ---- ------- ------------------ - --- -----------
Inorde r to  an a ly z e d if f ere n t  types of nonli near aniso tr o pi c $(j, \th e ta, 
\ alpha)$ -depend ent m a gnetore sistivity  response s,  giv e n  by  formulas(\[F22\] )-(\[F24\ ] ), we sh ouldbea r in m in d t hat t hese r e spo nses,  as is  s een fr om fo rm ula
 for_the dimensionless_Hall constant $\epsilon$ can_be derived._For_this purpose_we_exclude $\nu_{i}^{-}$ from_[Eqs.]{} (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]), for_$\nu_{a}^{-}$ use [Eq.]{} (\[F17\]); and_after some algebra_in_the limit $\epsilon\cdot\tan\alpha<<1$ we have: $$\label{F27}n\epsilon=\frac{2\rho_{\perp}^{-}\cdot\rho_{\parallel}^{+}+\rho_{f}\sin2\alpha(1-\nu_{a})\nu_{i}\rho_{\parallel}^{-}}{[2\nu_{a}\rho_{\parallel}^{+}-\sin2\alpha\cdot\rho_{f}\nu_{i}F_{Ly}\nu_{a}^{'}]\rho_{f}\nu_{i}^{2}}.$$

It is easy to check that from [Eq.]{} (\[F27\]) follows_scaling_relations $\delta=n\epsilon/\rho_{f}=\rho_{\perp
i}/(\rho_{\parallel_i})^2$_(for_$i$-pins at $\nu_a=1$) and [Eq.]{} (\[F20\])_(for $a$-pins at $\nu_i=1$)

As it_follows from_Eqs. (25) and (27), just the same “scaling”_relations_as given by_Eqs. (22) and (23) for *a*-pins, exist also for_(*i*+*a*)-pins (with a replacement of corresponding_*a*-resistivities in Eq._(8)_by_$\rho_f\rho_{\perp}^{-}$ and $\rho_f\rho_{\parallel}^{+}$). Physically_it follows from the fact that_point-like disorder does not change the_angular dependence of the ratio $\rho_{\perp
a}^{+}/\rho_{\parallel a}^{+}$,_which determines the angle $\beta$ between_$\mathbf{j}$ and average velocity vector_$\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$ for_$a$-pins$^{11}$, and influences only the_magnitude of $\langle\mathbf{v}\rangle$$^{16}$.

Grafical_analysis of_nonlinear regimes.
=======================================

Pinning potential_and $\nu$-function behavior.
----------------------------------------------

In order to analyze_different types of_nonlinear anisotropic $(j, \theta,
\alpha)$-dependent magnetoresistivity responses,_given_by formulas (\[F22\])-(\[F24\]),_we_should_bear in_mind that these_responses,_as is_seen_from formula