 compare to other alternatives such as the high-dimensional OLS-based procedures.

This paper presents empirical and theoretical evidence on the finite sample behavior of post double Lasso and the debiased Lasso (in the appendix). Specifically, we analyze the finite sample OVBs arising from the Lasso not selecting all the relevant control variables. Our results have important practical implications, and we provide guidance for empirical researchers.

We focus on the implications of under-selection for post double Lasso and the debiased Lasso in linear regression models. However, our results on the under-selection of the Lasso also have important implications for other inference methods that rely on Lasso as a first-step estimator. Towards this end, an interesting avenue for future research would be to investigate the impact of under-selection on the performance of the non-linear Lasso-based approaches proposed by @belloni2014inference, @farrell2015robust, @belloni2017program, and @chernozhukov2018double. In moderately high-dimensional settings where $p$ is smaller than but comparable to $n$, it would also be interesting to compare the non-linear treatment effects estimators in @belloni2014inference to the robust finite sample methods proposed by @rothe2017robust.

Finally, this paper motivates further examinations of the practical usefulness of Lasso-based inference procedures and other modern high-dimensional methods. For example, in the context of the study of elite college effects by @dale2002estimating, @angrist2019machine find that post double Lasso can be useful for regression-based sensitivity analyses when there is an abundance of potential control variables. They further present interesting simulation evidence on the finite sample behavior of Lasso-based IV methods [e.g., @belloni2012sparse].

[Appendix to “Omitted variable bias of Lasso-based inference methods: A finite sample analysis” (for online publication)]{}

Notation {#notation.unnumbered}
========

Here we collect additional notation that is not provided in the main text. The $\ell_{q}-$norm of a vector $v\in\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is denoted by $\left|v\right|_{q}$, $1\leq q\leq\infty$ where $\left|v\right|_{q}:=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1/q}$ when $
compare to other alternatives such as the high - dimensional OLS - based procedures. 

 This newspaper confront empirical and theoretical evidence on the finite sample behavior of position double Lasso and the debiased Lasso (in the appendix). Specifically, we analyze the finite sample OVBs arise from the Lasso not choose all the relevant control variables. Our results have important virtual implications, and we provide steering for empirical researchers. 

 We focus on the implications of under - selection for post double Lasso and the debiased Lasso in analogue regression models. However, our results on the under - choice of the Lasso also have significant implications for early inference methods that trust on Lasso as a first - step estimator. Towards this end, an interesting avenue for future inquiry would be to investigate the impact of under - selection on the performance of the non - linear Lasso - based approaches proposed by @belloni2014inference, @farrell2015robust, @belloni2017program, and @chernozhukov2018double. In moderately high - dimensional settings where $ p$ is smaller than but comparable to $ n$, it would also be interesting to compare the non - linear treatment effects estimators in @belloni2014inference to the robust finite sample distribution method proposed by @rothe2017robust. 

 last, this newspaper motivates further examinations of the practical utility of Lasso - based inference routine and other modern eminent - dimensional methods. For example, in the context of the study of elite college effects by @dale2002estimating, @angrist2019machine find that position double Lasso can be useful for regression - based sensitivity analysis when there cost an abundance of potential control variables. They further present interesting model evidence on the finite sample behavior of Lasso - based IV method [ e.g., @belloni2012sparse ]. 

 [ Appendix to “ Omitted variable bias of Lasso - base inference methods: A finite sample psychoanalysis ” (for online publication) ] { } 

 Notation { # notation.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = 

 Here we collect additional note that is not provided in the main textbook. The $ \ell_{q}-$norm of a vector $ v\in\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is denoted by $ \left|v\right|_{q}$, $ 1\leq q\leq\infty$ where $ \left|v\right|_{q}:=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1 / q}$ when $
 colpare to other alternatiyes such as the kugh-dimxnsionam OLS-basdd procedures.

This paper presxnts empieical and theoretical dvidence ln the funitt sample behavior of post doubls Lasvi and the debissed Lasso (in the appendhx). S'ecifically, we analyze the finite saiple OVNs arising from jhe Lsfso hot selecting all the relevant confrol vagiables. Our resulys have important practicap imolications, and we orovide guieancq for empiricxl researchers.

We focus on the implications of under-seuectipn for posj soktle Lasso aid the debiased Lasso in lhnear rrgression modeks. Iowecer, our results on thx under-selection of jhe Lasso dlao have important inplicdtiots fue oghed mnfsrence mevhods that dely on Laswo as a first-step extynator. Towards this qnq, an interesting avenue for future resedrcg would be to investigare the impact of undet-selection on the performance of the non-linear Lasso-based a[proarhds kriposea bj @belloni2014inference, @farrell2015robust, @belloni2017progrwj, snc @chernozhukov2018bouble. In moderayepy righ-dimensionxl setcjnfs where $p$ is smalper thag but comparabje tp $n$, it would also be interewting to comiare the non-linear trectment effeccs estomatots in @belloni2014inference co the robust finlte sampls methods proposea bj @rodhe2017robusu.

Winally, this papew motivatxs fuxther exxminstions of the prwctical usefulness of Ladso-badeg inferencf procedures and other modern hmjh-dimensional mathmds. For zxamplc, in the contexe of the study of elice coluege effecns by @dalx2002estimating, @wngrist2019machina find that pmst doubje Lqsso can be jseful for regtession-based sensituvity analyses whek thete is an abundancz if potential comtrul dagiaules. Evey further [resdnt onterdsting simuoxtiom evidence on the fitite sample behavior og Jasso-basgd IV metrods [e.g., @bellomi2012sparse].

[Appendix tl “Omivted veriablr byas of Lasso-based inference mefhods: A flnibe sample anajysiw” (for online publication)]{}

Notation {#notation.unnumbered}
========

Iere we collect additiobal notation that ix not providxd in ehe main dext. The $\ell_{q}-$norm of a vector $v\in\mathnb{R}^{m}$ is denoted by $\leff|v\righd|_{q}$, $1\lee q\leq\infty$ where $\left|v\right|_{q}:=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1/q}$ when $
compare to other alternatives such as the procedures. paper presents and theoretical evidence of double Lasso and debiased Lasso (in appendix). Specifically, we analyze the finite OVBs arising from the Lasso not selecting all the relevant control variables. Our have important practical implications, and we provide guidance for empirical researchers. We focus the of for double Lasso and the debiased Lasso in linear regression models. However, our results on the under-selection the Lasso also have important implications for other methods that rely on as a first-step estimator. Towards end, interesting avenue future would to investigate the of under-selection on the performance of the non-linear Lasso-based approaches proposed by @belloni2014inference, @farrell2015robust, @belloni2017program, and @chernozhukov2018double. moderately high-dimensional $p$ is than comparable $n$, it would interesting to compare the non-linear treatment @belloni2014inference to the robust finite sample methods proposed @rothe2017robust. Finally, paper motivates further examinations of the usefulness of Lasso-based inference procedures and other modern methods. For example, in the context of the study of elite college effects by @dale2002estimating, that post double Lasso be useful for sensitivity when is abundance of control variables. They further present interesting simulation evidence on the finite behavior of Lasso-based IV methods [e.g., @belloni2012sparse]. [Appendix to “Omitted of inference methods: A sample analysis” (for online Notation ======== Here we collect that not main The of a vector $v\in\mathbb{R}^{m}$ denoted by $\left|v\right|_{q}$, $1\leq q\leq\infty$ $\left|v\right|_{q}:=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1/q}$ when $
 compare to other alternativeS such as the High-dImeNsiOnAl OLs-basEd procedures.

ThIS papEr presents empirical and TheorEtICal eVIdEnce oN the finITe SAMplE bEhAviOr OF pOst doUblE Lasso aNd the debiaSed laSso (in the appeNDiX). SpecificaLly, We analyze the FinIte samPlE OVbS arisIng From tHe LassO Not selEcting all ThE RelevaNT controL VArIablEs. Our results have iMPoRTant practical iMplicaTiONs, AND we ProVide guidanCe For emPIrical rESeARCHerS.

we focus on the iMplications OF unDer-selEcTioN For posT doubLe lAssO and the debiAsed lasso in liNear reGRession MOdels. HoWever, oUr rEsuLts oN ThE uNdeR-sELecTIoN of THe LAsso also HaVe ImporTant IMPLIcatIonS for Other Inference methOds That REly On LasSo as a FirsT-sTep esTimatoR. TowaRdS this end, an interEstiNg avenue fOr fUtUre ReSearcH Would bE to InvEstigatE the impACt oF uNDER-sElection on the perfoRmANCe Of the non-Linear lAsSo-BAsed apprOaCheS proPOSed by @BellONi2014InferencE, @farreLL2015rObUst, @bellOnI2017progrAm, And @CheRnozhUKov2018dOuble. IN moderatEly hiGH-dimensional seTTings where $p$ is SMaLLEr THan bUt cOmparable to $N$, it wOUld aLso bE InTerESting To comPaRE tHE non-linear treatment EfFects eStimaTors in @belloni2014Inference tO THE robust fInitE SaMPle methods propOsed bY @rothe2017robuST.

Finally, This pAper motiVates furtHER examinaTioNs oF thE prACTiCal usefulness OF lassO-bAsed infEreNce procEduRes And OthEr Modern higH-dimensiOnAl MeThOds. for exAMple, in thE cOntExT of The stUDy of elIte coLlegE eFfECts By @dale2002eSTiMATing, @AnGrIst2019mAchInE find That POst Double LAsso can be UseFUl foR rEgRession-Based sensitivItY analyses wHeN thEre is aN ABundance Of potential control variaBLes. They FurTher pReseNt interesTinG simulAtiON evideNce on tHe finItE saMPLe behAVIoR of laSso-based IV METhoDs [e.g., @bElLoni2012Sparse].

[APpendix to “Omitted vaRIabLe bias of Lasso-BasEd inFEReNce MEtHOds: a fINitE SAmple analysis” (foR online pubLiCAtIon)]{}

NotatioN {#NotAtIon.unnuMbered}
========

HEre we COllect aDditional Notation tHaT is nOT ProVided in the Main text. the $\ell_{q}-$noRM of a vECtOr $v\in\MatHbb{R}^{m}$ iS dEnoTed by $\Left|v\rIGht|_{Q}$, $1\leq q\Leq\infTy$ Where $\lEft|v\rIgHt|_{q}:=\left(\sUm_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1/q}$ wHen $
 compare to other alternat ives suchas th e h igh -d imen sion al OLS-based p r oced ures.

This paper pres entsem p iric a land t heoreti c al e vid en ce  on  t h efinit e s ample b ehavior of  po st  double Lass o  a nd the deb ias ed Lasso (in  th e appe nd ix) .  Spec ifi cally , we a n alyzethe finit es ampleO VBs ari s i ng  fro m the Lasso not s e le c ting all the r elevan tc on t r olvar iables. Ou rresul t s havei mp o r t ant practical imp lications,a ndwe pro vi deg uidanc e for  e m pir ical resear cher s.

We fo cus on the imp l ication s of u nde r-s elec t io nfor  p o std ou ble Las so and t he  d ebias ed L a s s o  inlin earregre ssion models.  Ho weve r , o ur re sults  onth e und er-sel ectio nof the Lasso al so h ave impor tan timp li catio n s foroth erinferen ce meth o dsth a t re ly on Lasso as a f ir s t -s tep esti mator. To wa r ds thisen d,an i n t erest inga ve nue forfuture re se arch wo ul d be t oinv est igate theimpact  of unde r-sel e ction on the p e rformance oft he n on - line arLasso-based  app r oach es p r op ose d  by @ bello ni 2 01 4 inference, @farrell 20 15robu st, @ belloni2017pr ogram, and @ c hernozhu kov2 0 18 d ouble. In mode ratel y high-dim e nsionalsetti ngs wher e $p$ iss m aller th anbut  co mpa r a bl e to $n$, itw o uldal so be i nte resting  to  co mpa reth e non-lin ear trea tm en tef fec ts es t imatorsin  @b el lon i2014 i nferen ce to  the  r ob u stfinites am p l e me th od s pr opo se d by@rot h e20 17robus t.

Final ly, this  p ap er moti vates further  e xamination softhe pr a c tical us efulness of Lasso-based inferen ceproce dure s and oth ermodern  hi g h-dime nsiona l met ho ds. F or ex a m pl e,in  the conte x t  of  thest udyof elit e college effectsb y @ dale2002estim ati ng,@ a ng ris t 20 1 9ma ch i nef i nd that post do uble Lasso  c a nbe usefulf orre gressio n-based  sens i tivityanalyseswhen ther eis a n abu ndance ofpotentia l control varia b le s. Th eyfurthe rpre sentintere s tin g sim ulatio neviden ce on  t he finit e sample behavior of La sso-ba sed I V m ethods [e .g. ,  @b elloni201 2spa rse].

[Ap pen dix  to “ Omi t ted v aria b le  bi a s ofLass o -based in f er enc e me thods: A fi n i t e s ample  an a lysis”  (fo r online publicat i on)]{}

Notati on { # n ota tio n .unn um bered}
======= =
He r e  we coll ec t additiona l notati on thatis not  provi ded int h em ain te xt.The  $\ell_{q }-$ no r m of ave ct o r $v\i n\ma th bb{R}^ {m}$ i s  den o t ed by $\left|v\r ight| _ { q}$,$ 1\l eq q\ le q\infty $  whe re $\left| v\right|_{q }:=\le ft(\ sum_{ i=1}^{m }\ left|v _{i }\ right|^{q} \ right)^{1 /q}$when $
 compare_to other_alternatives such as the_high-dimensional OLS-based_procedures.

This_paper presents_empirical_and theoretical evidence_on the finite_sample behavior of post_double Lasso and_the_debiased Lasso (in the appendix). Specifically, we analyze the finite sample OVBs arising from_the_Lasso not_selecting_all_the relevant control variables. Our_results have important practical implications,_and we_provide guidance for empirical researchers.

We focus on the_implications_of under-selection for_post double Lasso and the debiased Lasso in linear_regression models. However, our results on_the under-selection of_the_Lasso_also have important implications_for other inference methods that rely_on Lasso as a first-step estimator._Towards this end, an interesting avenue for_future research would be to investigate_the impact of under-selection on_the performance_of the non-linear Lasso-based approaches_proposed by @belloni2014inference,_@farrell2015robust, @belloni2017program,_and @chernozhukov2018double. In_moderately high-dimensional settings where $p$ is_smaller than but_comparable to $n$, it would also_be_interesting to compare_the_non-linear_treatment effects_estimators in @belloni2014inference_to_the robust_finite_sample methods proposed by @rothe2017robust.

Finally, this_paper_motivates further examinations of the practical usefulness_of Lasso-based inference procedures_and_other modern high-dimensional methods._For example, in the context_of the study of elite college_effects by_@dale2002estimating, @angrist2019machine_find that post double Lasso can be useful for regression-based sensitivity_analyses when there is an abundance_of potential control variables._They further_present_interesting simulation evidence_on_the finite_sample behavior of Lasso-based IV methods [e.g.,_@belloni2012sparse].

[Appendix to_“Omitted variable bias of Lasso-based inference_methods: A finite sample_analysis”_(for online publication)]{}

Notation {#notation.unnumbered}
========

Here we collect_additional notation that is not provided_in the main text. The_$\ell_{q}-$norm_of_a vector $v\in\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is denoted_by $\left|v\right|_{q}$, $1\leq q\leq\infty$ where $\left|v\right|_{q}:=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|v_{i}\right|^{q}\right)^{1/q}$_when $