MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium; statics  {#RDMMee}
----------------------------------------

So far, we have considered only the ultimate microscopic level (called *MICRO level*) and the ultimate macroscopic level (called *equilibrium level*). Now we take into consideration also mesoscopic levels and formulate a general thermodynamics associated with the passage *MESO* $\rightarrow$ *meso* (that we call hereafter simply thermodynamics). We begin with Postulate 0. We modify it by noting that *equilibrium level* is not the only well established level that is less microscopic than the *MICRO level*. There is in fact a whole family of such levels (for example fluid mechanics and kinetic theory levels). These well established mesoscopic levels differ from the equilibrium level by the fact that, in general, a time evolution takes place on them (we recall that no time evolution takes place on the equilibrium level) and also by the fact that they are applicable also to macroscopic systems subjected to external influences (e.g. the level of fluid mechanics is applicable to the Rayleigh-Bénard system). We thus replace the postulate of the existence of equilibrium states with a more general

***MESO Postulate 0***

*There exist well established mesoscopic levels*.

The remaining two postulates are the same as in the Gibbs theory except that the state variable $f({{\boldmath \mbox{$r$}}},{{\boldmath \mbox{$v$}}})$ used on the *MICRO level* is replaced by another state variables used on mesoscopic levels. As we have done already in Eq.(\[Fdyn\]), we shall denote it on $MESO$ level by the symbol $x$. For example, $x$ can be one particle distribution function (used in kinetic theory) of hydrodynamic fields (used in fluid mechanics):

***MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium Postulate I***.

*State variables on MESO level are quantities denoted by the symbol $x$*

We recall the $\textit{MESO level}$ is a well established level (i.e. theoretical predictions on *MESO level* agree with results of *MESO* experimental observations). This then means that $x$ is known.

***MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium Postulate II (statics)***.

\(i) *The fundamental thermodynamic relation consists of a specification of three potential $$\label{MESOftr}
N
MESO $ \rightarrow$ equilibrium; statics   { # RDMMee } 
 ---------------------------------------- 

 So far, we have considered merely the ultimate microscopic degree (called * MICRO level *) and the ultimate macroscopic level (call * equilibrium level *). immediately we assume into consideration besides mesoscopic degree and formulate a cosmopolitan thermodynamics associated with the passage * MESO * $ \rightarrow$ * meso * (that we call hereafter plainly thermodynamics). We begin with Postulate 0. We modify it by noting that * equilibrium level * is not the lone well established level that is less microscopic than the * MICRO level *. There exist in fact a whole family of such levels (for example fluent mechanics and energizing theory levels). These well established mesoscopic levels disagree from the equilibrium level by the fact that, in general, a time evolution takes place on them (we recall that no time evolution takes place on the equilibrium level) and also by the fact that they are applicable also to macroscopic systems subject to external influences (e.g. the degree of fluent mechanics is applicable to the Rayleigh - Bénard system). We thus replace the postulate of the existence of equilibrium states with a more general 

 * * * MESO Postulate 0 * * * 

 * There exist well build mesoscopic levels *. 

 The remaining two postulates are the same as in the Gibbs theory except that the state variable star $ f({{\boldmath \mbox{$r$}}},{{\boldmath \mbox{$v$}}})$ used on the * MICRO level * is replaced by another state variables used on mesoscopic levels. As we have do already in Eq.(\[Fdyn\ ]), we shall denote it on $ MESO$ level by the symbol $ x$. For example, $ x$ can be one particle distribution function (practice in kinetic theory) of hydrodynamic fields (used in fluid mechanics ): 

 * * * MESO $ \rightarrow$ equilibrium Postulate I * * *. 

 * State variable on MESO level are quantity denoted by the symbol $ x$ * 

 We recall the $ \textit{MESO level}$ is a well establish level (i.e. theoretical prediction on * MESO level * match with results of * MESO * experimental observation). This then means that $ x$ is known. 

 * * * MESO $ \rightarrow$ balance Postulate II (statics) * * *. 

 \(i) * The cardinal thermodynamic relation consists of a specification of three likely $ $ \label{MESOftr } 
 N
MESL $\rightarrow$ equilibrium; statics  {#RDMMeg}
----------------------------------------

Si far, xe have considefed only the ultimate microsropix levtj (called *MICRO levdl*) and thv ultimatw marroscopic level (rzlled *equilibdlum lzvxl*). Now we take lnto considaration also masuseopic levels and formulate a general thermocyjamics associajed wptr ths passage *MESO* $\rightarrow$ *meso* (thaf we canl hereafter ximply thermodynamics). We bfgin with Postulate 0. Wf modify it by giting that *eduilibrium level* is noj the only well established leveu thac is less muceosfmpic than tie *MICGO level*. Therc is in fact a whole family pf vucy levels (for example hluid mechanics and hinetic tvekry levels). These qeol esjablivhed nesusckpmc mevels dihfer from tge equilibruum level by the favt nnat, in generzl, a tymq evolution takes place on them (we recanl fhat no time evolution rakes place on the eqoilibrium jevel) and also by the fact that they are applicabne alau ti ixxrlscopic systems subjected to external influensss (e.n. the level of fjuid mechanocd of applicable jo the Xzymeigh-Bénard system). Ae thus replqce the pjstukate of the existence of eqyilibrium stctew with a more genexal

***MESO Postblate 0***

*Jhere rxist well established oesoacopic leveps*.

The remzkning two postulxtex dre the same as in the Gibfs theory exczpt that the state variable $v({{\boldmath \mbox{$r$}}},{{\boldmath \lbox{$v$}}})$ uved on the *MICRO level* is replaced by anovier state varoatlev used ou mesoxcopic levels. As we have doue alreaby in Dq.(\[Fdyn\]), we ahall dxnote it on $IESO$ level by jhe symbol $x$. Hor exampje, $x$ can be one oarticle distrobution flnetion (usee in kinetic theorn) of fgdrodynamic fieods (used in fluid kecfanycd):

***MXSO $\rychtarrow$ equhlibfiuo Postjlate I***.

*Statc vxrianles on MESO level ase qhantities denoted ny the symvol $x$*

We wecall the $\tectit{MESO level}$ is w weln ertabloshgd level (i.e. theoretical predictjons on *MFSO level* agree witm refults of *MZSO* experimental observations). This then neans that $x$ is kniwn.

***MESO $\rightarrow$ gqullibrium Posvulate II (statiws)***.

\(i) *The fundamental rhermodynamic relstion consists of a slecifiwatioj of three potential $$\label{MESOftr}
N
MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium; statics {#RDMMee} ---------------------------------------- So have only the microscopic level (called macroscopic (called *equilibrium level*). we take into also mesoscopic levels and formulate a thermodynamics associated with the passage *MESO* $\rightarrow$ *meso* (that we call hereafter simply We begin with Postulate 0. We modify it by noting that *equilibrium level* not only established that is less microscopic than the *MICRO level*. There is in fact a whole family of levels (for example fluid mechanics and kinetic theory These well established mesoscopic differ from the equilibrium level the that, in a evolution place on them recall that no time evolution takes place on the equilibrium level) and also by the fact that are applicable macroscopic systems to influences the level of is applicable to the Rayleigh-Bénard system). the postulate of the existence of equilibrium states a more ***MESO Postulate 0*** *There exist well mesoscopic levels*. The remaining two postulates are the as in the Gibbs theory except that the state variable $f({{\boldmath \mbox{$r$}}},{{\boldmath \mbox{$v$}}})$ used on level* is replaced by state variables used mesoscopic As have already in we shall denote it on $MESO$ level by the symbol $x$. example, $x$ can be one particle distribution function (used in of fields (used in mechanics): ***MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium I***. variables on MESO level denoted the recall $\textit{MESO is a well established (i.e. theoretical predictions on *MESO agree with results of means that $x$ is known. ***MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium II (statics)***. \(i) *The fundamental thermodynamic relation of a specification of three potential $$\label{MESOftr} N
MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium; Statics  {#RDMmee}
----------------------------------------

So Far, We hAvE conSideRed only the ultiMAte mIcroscopic level (called *MiCRO lEvEL*) and THe UltimAte macrOScOPIc lEvEl (CalLeD *EqUilibRiuM level*). NOw we take inTo cOnSideration alSO mEsoscopic lEveLs and formulaTe a GeneraL tHerMOdynaMicS assoCiated WIth the Passage *MEsO* $\RIghtarROw$ *meso* (tHAT wE calL hereafter simply tHErMOdynamics). We begIn with poSTuLATe 0. WE moDify it by noTiNg thaT *EquilibRIuM LEVel* IS not the only weLl establishED leVel thaT iS leSS microScopiC tHAn tHe *MICRO leveL*. TheRe is in facT a wholE Family oF Such levEls (for ExaMplE fluID mEcHanIcS And KInEtiC TheOry levelS). THeSe welL estABLIShed MesOscoPic leVels differ froM thE equILibRium lEvel bY the FaCt thaT, in genEral, a TiMe evolution takeS plaCe on them (wE reCaLl tHaT no tiME evoluTioN taKes placE on the eQUilIbRIUM lEvel) and also by the faCt THAt They are aPplicaBLe AlSO to macroScOpiC sysTEMs subJectED tO externaL influENcEs (E.g. the leVeL of fluId MecHanIcs is APpliCable tO the RaylEigh-BÉNard system). We thUS replace the poSTuLATe OF the ExiStence of equIlibRIum sTateS WiTh a MOre geNeral

***mEso POStulate 0***

*There exist weLl EstablIshed Mesoscopic levEls*.

The remaININg two posTulaTEs ARe the same as in tHe GibBs theory exCEpt that tHe staTe variabLe $f({{\boldmaTH \Mbox{$r$}}},{{\bolDmaTh \mBox{$V$}}})$ usED On The *MICRO level* IS ReplAcEd by anoTheR state vAriAblEs uSed On MesoscopiC levels. AS wE hAvE dOne AlreaDY in Eq.(\[FdyN\]), wE shAlL deNote iT On $MESO$ Level By thE sYmBOl $x$. for examPLe, $X$ CAn be OnE pArtiCle DiStribUtioN FunCtion (usEd in kinetIc tHEory) Of HyDrodynaMic fields (used In Fluid mechaNiCs):

***MeSO $\rigHTArrow$ equIlibrium Postulate I***.

*State VAriableS on mESO lEvel Are quantiTieS denotEd bY The symBol $x$*

We RecalL tHe $\tEXTit{MEso LeVel}$ Is A well estabLISheD leveL (i.E. theOreticaL predictions on *MESO LEveL* agree with resUltS of *Meso* eXpeRImENtaL oBSerVATions). This then meAns that $x$ is KnOWn.

***mESO $\rightaRRow$ EqUilibriUm PostuLate Ii (Statics)***.

\(I) *The fundaMental theRmOdynAMIc rElation conSists of a SpecificaTIon of THrEe potEntIal $$\labEl{mESoftr}
N
MESO $\rightarrow$ equilib rium; stat ics {#R DMM ee }
-- ---- -------------- - ---- ---------------

So fa r, we  h a ve c o ns idere d onlyt he u lti ma te  mi cr o sc opiclev el (cal led *MICRO  le ve l*) and theu lt imate macr osc opic level ( cal led *e qu ili b riumlev el*).  Now w e  takeinto cons id e ration also me s o sc opic  levels and formu l at e  a general the rmodyn am i cs a sso cia ted with t he  pass a ge *MES O *$ \ r igh t arrow$ *meso*  (that we c a llhereaf te r s i mply t hermo dy n ami cs). We beg in w ith Postu late 0 .  We mod i fy it b y noti ngtha t *e q ui li bri um lev e l*  is not  the onl ywe ll es tabl i s h e d le vel  tha t isless microsco pic  tha n  th e *MI CRO l evel *.  Ther e is i n fac ta whole familyof s uch level s ( fo r e xa mplef luid m ech ani cs andkinetic the or y l ev els). These well e st a b li shed mes oscopi c  l ev e ls diffe rfro m th e equil ibri u mlevel by  the f a ct  t hat, in  g eneral ,a t ime  evol u tion  takes  place o n the m  (we recall th a t no time evo l ut i o nt akes  pl ace on theequi l ibri um l e ve l)a nd al so by  t h ef act that they are a pp licabl e als o to macrosco pic system s s ubjected  toe xt e rnal influence s (e. g. the lev e l of flu id me chanicsis applic a b le to th e R ayl eig h-B é n ar d system). We t husre place t hepostula teofthe  ex is tence ofequilibr iu mst at eswitha  more ge ne ral 
*** MESOP ostula te 0* **
*T he r e e xist we l le s tabl is he d me sos co pic l evel s *.
The re maining t wop ostu la te s are t he same as in  t he Gibbs t he ory  excep t that the  state variable $f({{\b o ldmath\mb ox{$r $}}} ,{{\boldm ath  \mbox {$v $ }}})$used o n the  * MIC R O  leve l *  i s r ep laced by a n o the r sta te  var iablesused on mesoscopic lev els. As we ha vedone a lr ead y  i n  Eq .( \ [Fd y n \]), we shall d enote it o n$ ME SO$ levelb y t he  symbol  $x$. F or ex a mple, $ x$ can be  one part ic le d i s tri bution fun ction (u sed in ki n etict he ory)ofhydrod yn ami c fie lds (u s edin fl uid me ch anics) :

** *M ESO $\ri ghtarrow$ equilibrium P ostula te I* **. 

*Statevar i abl es on MES O le vel are qu ant iti es de not e d bythes ym bol $x$*
Wer ecall the $\ tex t i t{ MESO level} $ i s a  well  es t ablish ed l evel (i.e. theore t ical predictio ns o n *ME SOl evel *agree with res ult so f  *MESO*ex perimentalobservat io n s). T his th en mea ns that $ x$ is kno wn.
** *MESO $\r igh ta r row$ eq ui li b rium P ostu la te II(stati c s)** * . 

\(i) *The fund ament a l  ther m ody namic  r elation cons ists of aspecificati on ofthre e pot ential$$ \label {ME SO ftr}
N
MESO $\rightarrow$_equilibrium; statics_ {#RDMMee}
----------------------------------------

So far, we_have considered_only_the ultimate_microscopic_level (called *MICRO_level*) and the_ultimate macroscopic level (called_*equilibrium level*). Now_we_take into consideration also mesoscopic levels and formulate a general thermodynamics associated with the_passage_*MESO* $\rightarrow$_*meso*_(that_we call hereafter simply thermodynamics)._We begin with Postulate 0._We modify_it by noting that *equilibrium level* is not_the_only well established_level that is less microscopic than the *MICRO level*._There is in fact a whole_family of such_levels_(for_example fluid mechanics and_kinetic theory levels). These well established_mesoscopic levels differ from the equilibrium_level by the fact that, in general,_a time evolution takes place on_them (we recall that no_time evolution_takes place on the equilibrium_level) and also_by the_fact that they_are applicable also to macroscopic systems_subjected to external_influences (e.g. the level of fluid_mechanics_is applicable to_the_Rayleigh-Bénard_system). We_thus replace the_postulate_of the_existence_of equilibrium states with a more_general

***MESO_Postulate 0***

*There exist well established mesoscopic levels*.

The_remaining two postulates are_the_same as in the_Gibbs theory except that the_state variable $f({{\boldmath \mbox{$r$}}},{{\boldmath \mbox{$v$}}})$ used_on the_*MICRO level*_is replaced by another state variables used on mesoscopic levels. As_we have done already in Eq.(\[Fdyn\]),_we shall denote it_on $MESO$_level_by the symbol_$x$._For example,_$x$ can be one particle distribution function_(used in_kinetic theory) of hydrodynamic fields (used_in fluid mechanics):

***MESO $\rightarrow$_equilibrium_Postulate I***.

*State variables on MESO level_are quantities denoted by the symbol_$x$*

We recall the $\textit{MESO level}$_is_a_well established level (i.e. theoretical_predictions on *MESO level* agree with_results of *MESO*_experimental observations). This then means that $x$_is_known.

***MESO $\rightarrow$ equilibrium Postulate II (statics)***.

\(i)_*The_fundamental thermodynamic relation consists of a_specification_of_three potential $$\label{MESOftr}
N