At zero temperature all neurons are updated in parallel according to the rule $$\begin{aligned}
        \label{eq:gain}
        \sigma_i(t+1) &  =   &
               \mbox{g}_b(h_{\Lambda,i}(t))
                  \nonumber      \\
               \mbox{g}_b(x) &\equiv& \sum_{k=1}^Qs_k
                        \left[\theta\left[b(s_{k+1}+s_k)-x\right]-
                              \theta\left[b(s_k+s_{k-1})-x\right]
                        \right]\end{aligned}$$ with $s_0\equiv -\infty$ and $s_{Q+1}\equiv +\infty$. Here $\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$ is the gain function and $b>0$ is the gain parameter of the system. For finite $Q$, this gain function is a step function. The gain parameter $b$ controls the average slope of $\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$.

Local field dynamics
====================

In order to measure the retrieval quality of the system one can use the Hamming distance between a stored pattern and the microscopic state of the network $$d({\bxi}^\mu,{\bsigma}_\Lambda(t))\equiv
                \frac{1}{N}
                \sum_{i\in \Lambda}[\xi_i^\mu-\sigma_i(t)]^2         \,.$$ This introduces the main overlap and the arithmetic mean of the neuron activities $$\label{eq:mdef}
        m_\Lambda^\mu(t)=\frac{1}{NA}
                \sum_{i\in\Lambda}\xi_i^\mu\sigma_i(t),
                \quad \mu \in {\cal P}\, ; \quad
        a_\Lambda(t)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i\in\Lambda}[\sigma_i(t)]^2    \,.$$ The key question is then how these quantities evolve in time under the parallel dynamics specified before. For a general time step we find from eq. (\[eq:gain\]) using the law of large numbers (LLN) that in the thermodynamic limit $$\begin{aligned}
        m^1(t+1) \ustr{Pr}{=} \frac{1}{A} \langle\!\langle
At zero temperature all neurons are updated in parallel according to the dominion $ $ \begin{aligned } 
         \label{eq: amplification } 
         \sigma_i(t+1) &   =    & 
                \mbox{g}_b(h_{\Lambda, i}(t) ) 
                   \nonumber       \\ 
                \mbox{g}_b(x) & \equiv & \sum_{k=1}^Qs_k 
                         \left[\theta\left[b(s_{k+1}+s_k)-x\right]- 
                               \theta\left[b(s_k+s_{k-1})-x\right ] 
                         \right]\end{aligned}$$ with $ s_0\equiv -\infty$ and $ s_{Q+1}\equiv + \infty$. Here $ \mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$ is the gain function and $ b>0 $ is the gain argument of the system. For finite $ Q$, this gain function is a tone function. The gain argument $ b$ operate the average gradient of $ \mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$. 

 Local field dynamics 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In order to measure the retrieval timbre of the system one can use the Hamming distance between a store pattern and the microscopic state of the net $ $ d({\bxi}^\mu,{\bsigma}_\Lambda(t))\equiv 
                 \frac{1}{N } 
                 \sum_{i\in \Lambda}[\xi_i^\mu-\sigma_i(t)]^2          \,.$$ This introduces the main overlap and the arithmetical mean of the neuron activities $ $ \label{eq: mdef } 
         m_\Lambda^\mu(t)=\frac{1}{NA } 
                 \sum_{i\in\Lambda}\xi_i^\mu\sigma_i(t), 
                 \quad \mu \in { \cal P}\, ; \quad 
         a_\Lambda(t)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i\in\Lambda}[\sigma_i(t)]^2     \,.$$ The key question is then how these quantities evolve in clock time under the parallel dynamics specified before. For a general time dance step we find from eq.   (\[eq: gain\ ]) using the law of large numbers (LLN) that in the thermodynamic limit $ $ \begin{aligned } 
         m^1(t+1) \ustr{Pr}{= } \frac{1}{A } \langle\!\langle
At xero temperature all neuvons are updated in parellel adcording to the rule $$\begin{aligned}
        \lavel{eq:gain}
        \sigma_k(t+1) &  =   &
               \mbox{g}_b(h_{\Lambda,i}(t))
                  \nonumber      \\
               \mbox{g}_t(x) &\eeuiv& \sum_{k=1}^Qs_k
                        \left[\thrtw\left[b(s_{k+1}+s_k)-x\rigrt]-
                              \theta\left[b(s_i+s_{k-1})-x\rigit]
                        \right]\end{aligned}$$ witj $s_0\equiv -\infty$ and $s_{Q+1}\equiv +\indty$. Rwre $\mbox{g}_b(\cdut)$ is the gain functioh and $b>0$ is the gain parameter ow the system. Fot rijhte $Q$, this jain flnction is a step funwtion. Tne gain parameber $b$ cobtrols the average slmpe of $\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$.

Ljcal fielg bynamics
====================

In order to mwawure jhe ratridcal quzlmty of thf sbstem one czn use the Yamming distance beuweqb a stored paftern wnq the microscopic state of the network $$g({\bxj}^\mu,{\bsigma}_\Lambda(t))\equiv
                \frac{1}{N}
                \sum_{i\in \Lambda}[\xi_i^\mu-\sigma_i(t)]^2         \,.$$ This intrmducea tht nain uceglap and the arithmetic mean of the neuron acejvotpes $$\label{eq:mdef}
        m_\Lambca^\lu(y)=\srac{1}{NA}
                \aum_{i\in\Lambda}\xi_i^\mu\slgma_i(t),
                \quac \mu \in {\cal P}\, ; \quad
        q_\Lambda(t)=\frac{1}{U}\sun_{i\in\Lambda}[\sigma_i(t)]^2    \,.$$ The key quextion is then how these quancities evolve in hime unded the parallel dyvampcs vpecified before. For a genqral time ste' we fina frpm eq. (\[ez:gain\]) usinh the law of large numbegs (LLU) thad in the tjermodynamic limit $$\begin{aligned}
        m^1(t+1) \ustt{Pr}{=} \frdc{1}{A} \langje\!\lannle
At zero temperature all neurons are updated according the rule \label{eq:gain} \sigma_i(t+1) & \mbox{g}_b(x) \sum_{k=1}^Qs_k \left[\theta\left[b(s_{k+1}+s_k)-x\right]- \theta\left[b(s_k+s_{k-1})-x\right] with $s_0\equiv -\infty$ $s_{Q+1}\equiv +\infty$. Here $\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$ is the function and $b>0$ is the gain parameter of the system. For finite $Q$, gain function is a step function. The gain parameter $b$ controls the average of Local dynamics In order to measure the retrieval quality of the system one can use the Hamming distance a stored pattern and the microscopic state of network $$d({\bxi}^\mu,{\bsigma}_\Lambda(t))\equiv \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i\in \,.$$ This introduces the main and arithmetic mean the activities m_\Lambda^\mu(t)=\frac{1}{NA} \sum_{i\in\Lambda}\xi_i^\mu\sigma_i(t), \quad \in {\cal P}\, ; \quad a_\Lambda(t)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i\in\Lambda}[\sigma_i(t)]^2 \,.$$ The key question is then how these quantities evolve in under the specified before. a time we find from using the law of large numbers the thermodynamic limit $$\begin{aligned} m^1(t+1) \ustr{Pr}{=} \frac{1}{A} \langle\!\langle
At zero temperature all neuroNs are updatEd in pAraLleL aCcorDing To the rule $$\begin{ALignEd}
        \label{eq:gain}
        \sigma_i(t+1) &  =   &
               \mbOx{g}_b(h_{\laMBda,i}(T))
                  \NoNumbeR      \\
               \mbox{g}_b(X) &\EqUIV& \suM_{k=1}^qs_K
                        \leFt[\THeTa\lefT[b(s_{K+1}+s_k)-x\rigHt]-
                              \theta\lefT[b(s_K+s_{K-1})-x\right]
                        \right]\ENd{Aligned}$$ witH $s_0\eQuiv -\infty$ and $S_{Q+1}\eQuiv +\inFtY$. HeRE $\mbox{G}_b(\cDot)$ is The gaiN FunctiOn and $b>0$ is tHe GAin parAMeter of THE sYsteM. For finite $Q$, this gaIN fUNction is a step fUnctioN. THE gAIN paRamEter $b$ contrOlS the aVErage slOPe OF $\MBox{G}_B(\cdot)$.

Local fieLd dynamics
====================

IN OrdEr to meAsUre THe retrIeval QuALitY of the systeM one Can use the hamminG DistancE Between A storeD paTteRn anD ThE mIcrOsCOpiC StAte OF thE network $$D({\bXi}^\Mu,{\bsiGma}_\LAMBDA(t))\eqUiv
                \Frac{1}{n}
                \sum_{i\In \Lambda}[\xi_i^\mu-\SigMa_i(t)]^2         \,.$$ tHis IntroDuces The mAiN overLap and The arItHmetic mean of the NeurOn activitIes $$\LaBel{Eq:Mdef}
        m_\lAmbda^\mU(t)=\fRac{1}{nA}
                \sum_{i\iN\Lambda}\XI_i^\mU\sIGMA_i(T),
                \quad \mu \in {\cal P}\, ; \quad
        a_\laMBDa(T)=\frac{1}{N}\suM_{i\in\LaMBdA}[\sIGma_i(t)]^2    \,.$$ The KeY quEstiON Is theN how THeSe quantiTies evOLvE iN time unDeR the paRaLleL dyNamicS SpecIfied bEfore. For A geneRAl time step we fiND from eq. (\[eq:gain\]) USiNG ThE Law oF laRge numbers (LlN) thAT in tHe thERmOdyNAmic lImit $$\bEgIN{aLIgned}
        m^1(t+1) \ustr{Pr}{=} \frac{1}{A} \lAnGle\!\lanGle
At zero temperature all ne urons areupdat edinpa rall el a ccording to th e  rul e $$\begin{aligned}
      \ l abel { eq :gain }
     \ s igm a_ i( t+1 )&  =   & 
             \mbo x{g }_ b(h_{\Lambda , i} (t))
                \n onu mber    \ \ 
            \mb o x{g}_b (x) &\equ iv &  \sum_ { k=1}^Qs _ k 
                    \ l eft[\theta\lef t[b(s_ {k + 1} + s _k) -x\ right]-
                  \theta\lef t[b(s_k+s_{ k -1} )-x\ri gh t]                  \righ t]\e nd{aligne d}$$ w i th $s_0 \ equiv - \infty $ a nd$s_{ Q +1 }\ equ iv +\i n ft y$. Her e $\mbox {g }_ b(\cd ot)$ i s thegai n fu nctio n and $b>0$ i s t he g a inparam eterof t he  syst em. Fo r fin it e $Q$, this gai n fu nction is  ast epfu nctio n . Thegai n p aramete r $b$ c o ntr ol s t he  average slope of$\ m b ox {g}_b(\c dot)$. 
L oc a l fielddy nam ics= = ===== ==== = == ======
In ord e rto  measur ethe re tr iev alquali t y of  the s ystem on e can use the Hammin g  distance bet w ee n as tore d p attern andthem icro scop i csta t e ofthe n et w or k  $$d({\bxi}^\mu,{\b si gma}_\ Lambd a(t))\equiv
           \frac{ 1}{N } 
             \sum_ {i\in \Lam b da}[\xi_ i^\mu -\sigma_ i(t)]^2      \,. $$Thi s i ntr o d uc es the main o v e rlap  a nd theari thmetic  me anofthe  n euron act ivities$$ \l ab el {eq :mdef } 
       m _\L am bda ^\mu( t )=\fra c{1}{ NA}          \s u m _{i\ in \L ambd a}\ xi _i^\m u\si g ma_ i(t),
            \q ua d\mu \in  {\cal P}\, ;  \ quad
      a_ \Lambd a ( t)=\frac {1}{N}\sum_{i\in\Lambda } [\sigma _i( t)]^2    \,.$$ The  ke y ques tio n  is th en how  thes equa n t ities e vo lve  i n time und e r  th e par al leldynamic s specified before .  Fo r a general t ime  ste p we  fi n df rom  e q . ( \ [ eq:gain\]) usin g the lawof la rge number s  (L LN ) thatin thetherm o dynamic  limit $$ \begin{al ig ned}       m^1(t+ 1) \ustr {Pr}{=} \ f rac{1 } {A } \la ngl e\!\la ng le
At zero_temperature all_neurons are updated in_parallel according_to_the rule_$$\begin{aligned}
_  _  _ \label{eq:gain}
  _  __ \sigma_i(t+1) &  =   &
      __ ___   \mbox{g}_b(h_{\Lambda,i}(t))
 _    _ _       __\nonumber  _   \\
     _     _  _\mbox{g}_b(x)_&\equiv&_\sum_{k=1}^Qs_k
   _     _     _      _ \left[\theta\left[b(s_{k+1}+s_k)-x\right]-
    _    _ _    _  _ _  _     \theta\left[b(s_k+s_{k-1})-x\right]
_  _     __  ___ _  __ _\right]\end{aligned}$$_with $s_0\equiv -\infty$ and $s_{Q+1}\equiv +\infty$._Here_$\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$ is the gain function and $b>0$_is the gain parameter_of_the system. For finite_$Q$, this gain function is_a step function. The gain parameter_$b$ controls_the average_slope of $\mbox{g}_b(\cdot)$.

Local field dynamics
====================

In order to measure the retrieval quality_of the system one can use_the Hamming distance between_a stored_pattern_and the microscopic_state_of the_network $$d({\bxi}^\mu,{\bsigma}_\Lambda(t))\equiv
     _ _     _  \frac{1}{N}
 __     _     _ \sum_{i\in \Lambda}[\xi_i^\mu-\sigma_i(t)]^2  ___    \,.$$_This introduces the main overlap and_the arithmetic mean_of the neuron activities $$\label{eq:mdef}
  __    m_\Lambda^\mu(t)=\frac{1}{NA}
 __     ___    _\sum_{i\in\Lambda}\xi_i^\mu\sigma_i(t),
     _        _ \quad \mu_\in {\cal P}\, ; \quad
___     a_\Lambda(t)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i\in\Lambda}[\sigma_i(t)]^2    \,.$$_The key_question is then_how these quantities evolve in time under the parallel dynamics_specified before. For a general time step_we find from eq. (\[eq:gain\]) using the law of large numbers (LLN)_that in the thermodynamic limit $$\begin{aligned}
  _     m^1(t+1) \ustr{Pr}{=}_\frac{1}{A} \langle\!\langle