 form factor is computed from states with $\Delta L_z = \pm 1,$ PQCD predicts $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim 1/Q^2 $ \[modulo logarithms\]. A detailed analysis shows that the asymptotic fall-off takes the form $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim \log^2 Q^2/Q^2$ [@Belitsky:2002kj]. One can also construct other models [@Brodsky:2003pw] incorporating the leading-twist perturbative QCD prediction which are consistent with the JLab polarization transfer data [@Jones:1999rz] for the ratio of proton Pauli and Dirac form factors. This analysis can also be extended to study the spin structure of scattering amplitudes at large transverse momentum and other processes which are dependent on the scaling and orbital angular momentum structure of light-front wavefunctions. Recently, Afanasev, Carlson, Chen, Vanderhaeghen, and I [@Chen:2004tw] have shown that the interfering two-photon exchange contribution to elastic electron-proton scattering, including inelastic intermediate states, can account for the discrepancy between Rosenbluth and Jefferson Lab spin transfer polarization data [@Jones:1999rz].

A crucial prediction of models for proton form factors is the relative phase of the timelike form factors, since this can be measured from the proton single spin symmetries in $e^+ e^- \to p
\bar p$ or $p \bar p \to \ell \bar \ell$ [@Brodsky:2003gs]. Carl Carlson, John Hiller, Dae Sung Hwang and I [@Brodsky:2003gs] have shown that measurements of the proton’s polarization strongly discriminate between the analytic forms of models which fit the proton form factors in the spacelike region. In particular, the single-spin asymmetry normal to the scattering plane measures the relative phase difference between the timelike $G_E$ and $G_M$ form factors. The dependence on proton polarization in the timelike region is expected to be large in most models, of the order of several tens of percent. The continuation of the spacelike form factors to the timelike domain $t = s > 4 M^2_p$ is very sensitive to the analytic form of the form factors; in particular it is very sensitive to the form of the PQCD predictions
form factor is computed from states with $ \Delta L_z = \pm 1,$ PQCD predict $ F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim 1 / Q^2 $ \[modulo logarithms\ ]. A detailed psychoanalysis shows that the asymptotic fall - off lead the shape $ F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim \log^2 Q^2 / Q^2 $   [ @Belitsky:2002kj ]. One can also construct early models   [ @Brodsky:2003pw ] incorporating the leading - braid perturbative QCD prediction which are consistent with the JLab polarization transfer datum   [ @Jones:1999rz ] for the ratio of proton Pauli and Dirac form factors. This analysis can besides be extended to study the tailspin structure of disperse amplitudes at large transverse momentum and other process which are dependent on the scaling and orbital angular momentum structure of light - front wavefunctions. Recently, Afanasev, Carlson, Chen, Vanderhaeghen, and I   [ @Chen:2004tw ] have show that the interfering two - photon exchange contribution to elastic electron - proton scattering, including inelastic intermediate country, can account for the discrepancy between Rosenbluth and Jefferson Lab spin transfer polarization data   [ @Jones:1999rz ]. 

 A crucial prediction of models for proton form factors is the relative phase of the timelike form factors, since this can be measured from the proton single spin symmetries in $ e^+ e^- \to p 
 \bar p$ or $ p \bar p \to \ell \bar \ell$   [ @Brodsky:2003gs ]. Carl Carlson, John Hiller, Dae Sung Hwang and I   [ @Brodsky:2003gs ] have read that measurements of the proton ’s polarization strongly discriminate between the analytic form of model which fit the proton form factors in the spacelike area. In particular, the individual - spin asymmetry normal to the scattering airplane measures the relative phase difference between the timelike $ G_E$ and $ G_M$ form factors. The dependence on proton polarization in the timelike region is expected to be large in most models, of the order of several ten of percent. The continuance of the spacelike form factors to the timelike domain $ t = s > 4 M^2_p$ is very sensitive to the analytic mannequin of the form factors; in particular it is very sensible to the form of the PQCD prediction
 fogm factor is computed frum states with $\Bwlta L_v = \pm 1,$ LQCD preaicts $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim 1/Q^2 $ \[modulo logerityms\]. A detailed analysis shods that tje asymprotir fall-off takes vge form $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \alm \loy^2 W^2/Q^2$ [@Belitsky:2002kj]. Oke can also construct othar mldels [@Brodsky:2003pw] incorporating the lewding-twosh perturbative QCD [redjbtlon which are consistent with ths JLab kolarization transger data [@Jones:1999rz] for the rahio lf proton Pauli anf Dirac forn fasrors. This anxlysis can also be extgnded to study the spin structurd of xcattering anplljudes at larje tragsverse momeknum and other lrocesses whicm are dependent on the scalinj and orbital angulat momentum scructure of light-fronr qavefonctimns. Fwcevtlg, Efahasev, Farmson, Chen, Banderhaeghwn, and I [@Chen:2004tw] have sriwn that the jnterfqryng two-photon exchange contribution to tlastjc electron-proton scattwring, including ineladtic intewmediate states, can account for the discrepancy batweei Fostnnjjrh and Jefferson Lab spin transfer polarization saua [@Jpnes:1999rz].

A cruciaj predictiom lf iodels for pruton form factors is the repative khase if the tiielile form factors, since this xan be measuged drom the proton siugle spin syometties im $e^+ e^- \to p
\bar p$ or $p \bax p \to \ell \bar \elp$ [@Brodsky:2003ga]. Carl Carlson, Jofn Milner, Dae Sung Hwang and I [@Brjdsky:2003gs] heve skown thag messuremqnts of thf probmn’s polarization shrongpy discriminwte between the analytic forms of models whicn xit the procon fovm factors in tre spacelike rggion. In 'articjlar, the spngle-spin asymmetry gormal to the dcattering pnane meafurew thw relatkxe phase diffetence betcten the tinelike $G_E$ and $G_M$ fprm ractors. The depzudtnxe on proton pplafizwtpon ig the timelika reeiov is ebpected to ne uargr in most models, of dhe krder of several trnf of perxent. The continuation of the spacelike vorm hactorr to yhe timelike domain $t = s > 4 M^2_p$ is bery sensltiye to the anajytig fotm of the fprm factors; in particular it is very seisitive to the form of rhe PQCD predictionx
form factor is computed from states with = 1,$ PQCD $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim 1/Q^2 analysis that the asymptotic takes the form \sim \log^2 Q^2/Q^2$ [@Belitsky:2002kj]. One can construct other models [@Brodsky:2003pw] incorporating the leading-twist perturbative QCD prediction which are consistent the JLab polarization transfer data [@Jones:1999rz] for the ratio of proton Pauli and form This can be extended to study the spin structure of scattering amplitudes at large transverse momentum and other which are dependent on the scaling and orbital momentum structure of light-front Recently, Afanasev, Carlson, Chen, Vanderhaeghen, I have shown the two-photon contribution to elastic scattering, including inelastic intermediate states, can account for the discrepancy between Rosenbluth and Jefferson Lab spin transfer data [@Jones:1999rz]. prediction of for form is the relative the timelike form factors, since this from the proton single spin symmetries in $e^+ \to p p$ or $p \bar p \to \bar \ell$ [@Brodsky:2003gs]. Carl Carlson, John Hiller, Dae Hwang and I [@Brodsky:2003gs] have shown that measurements of the proton’s polarization strongly discriminate between forms of models which the proton form in spacelike In the single-spin normal to the scattering plane measures the relative phase difference between timelike $G_E$ and $G_M$ form factors. The dependence on proton the region is expected be large in most of order of several tens The of factors the domain $t = s 4 M^2_p$ is very sensitive the analytic form of it is very sensitive to the form of PQCD predictions
 form factor is computed from sTates with $\DElta L_Z = \pm 1,$ pQCd pRediCts $F_2(q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim 1/Q^2 $ \[modulo lOGariThms\]. A detailed analysis sHows tHaT The aSYmPtotiC fall-ofF TaKES thE fOrM $F_2(Q^2)/f_1(Q^2) \SIm \Log^2 Q^2/Q^2$ [@belItsky:2002kj]. one can also ConStRuct other modELs [@brodsky:2003pw] iNcoRporating the LeaDing-twIsT peRTurbaTivE QCD pRedictIOn whicH are consiStENt with THe JLab pOLArIzatIon transfer data [@JoNEs:1999RZ] for the ratio of Proton paULi AND DiRac Form factorS. THis anALysis caN AlSO BE exTEnded to study tHe spin strucTUre Of scatTeRinG AmplitUdes aT lARge Transverse mOmenTum and othEr procESses whiCH are depEndent On tHe sCaliNG aNd OrbItAL anGUlAr mOMenTum strucTuRe Of ligHt-frONT WAvefUncTionS. ReceNtly, Afanasev, CArlSon, CHEn, VAnderHaeghEn, anD I [@chen:2004tW] have sHown tHaT the interfering Two-pHoton exchAngE cOntRiButioN To elasTic EleCtron-prOton scaTTerInG, INClUding inelastic inteRmEDIaTe states, Can accOUnT fOR the discRePanCy beTWEen RoSenbLUtH and JeffErson LAB sPiN transfEr PolariZaTioN daTa [@JonES:1999rz].

A CruciaL predictIon of MOdels for proton FOrm factors is tHE rELAtIVe phAse Of the timeliKe foRM facTors, SInCe tHIs can Be meaSuREd FRom the proton single sPiN symmeTries In $e^+ e^- \to p
\bar p$ or $P \bar p \to \ell \BAR \Ell$ [@BrodsKy:2003gs]. cArL carlson, John HilLer, DaE Sung Hwang ANd I [@BrodsKy:2003gs] hAve shown That measuREMents of tHe pRotOn’s PolARIzAtion strongly DIScriMiNate betWeeN the anaLytIc fOrmS of MoDels which Fit the prOtOn FoRm FacTors iN The spaceLiKe rEgIon. in parTIcular, The siNgle-SpIn ASymMetry noRMaL TO the ScAtTeriNg pLaNe meaSureS The RelativE phase difFerENce bEtWeEn the tiMelike $G_E$ and $G_M$ FoRm factors. THe DepEndencE ON proton pOlarization in the timelikE Region iS exPecteD to bE large in mOst Models, Of tHE order Of seveRal teNs Of pERCent. THE CoNtiNuAtion of the SPAceLike fOrM facTors to tHe timelike domain $t = s > 4 m^2_P$ is Very sensitive To tHe anALYtIc fORm OF thE fORm fACTors; in particulaR it is very sEnSItIve to the foRM of ThE PQCD prEdictioNs
 form factor is computed f rom states  with  $\ Del ta  L_z  = \ pm 1,$ PQCD pr e dict s $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \ sim 1 /Q ^ 2 $\ [m odulo  logari t hm s \ ].Ade tai le d  a nalys isshows t hat the as ymp to tic fall-off ta kes the fo rm$F_2(Q^2)/F_ 1(Q ^2) \s im  \l o g^2 Q ^2/ Q^2$[@Beli t sky:20 02kj]. On ec an als o  constr u c tothe r models [@Brodsk y :2 0 03pw] incorpor atingth e  l e a din g-t wist pertu rb ative QCD pre d ic t i o n w h ich are consi stent witht heJLab p ol ari z ationtrans fe r  da ta [@Jones: 1999 rz] for t he rat i o of pr o ton Pau li and  Di rac  for m  f ac tor s. Thi s  a nal y sis  can als obe  exte nded t o stud y t he s pin s tructure of s cat teri n g a mplit udesat l ar ge tr ansver se mo me ntum and otherproc esses whi char e d ep enden t  on th e s cal ing and  orbita l  an gu l a r  m omentum structureof l ig ht-front  wavef u nc ti o ns. Rece nt ly,  Afa n a sev,Carl s on , Chen,Vander h ae gh en, and  I  [@Che n: 200 4tw ] hav e  sho wn tha t the in terfe r ing two-photon exchange cont r ib u t io n  toela stic electr on-p r oton  sca t te rin g , inc ludin gi ne l astic intermediatest ates,can a ccount for th e discrepa n c y  between  Ros e nb l uth and Jeffer son L ab spin tr a nsfer po lariz ation da ta [@Jone s : 1999rz]. 

A  cr uci alp r ed iction of mod e l s fo rprotonfor m facto rsisthe  re la tive phas e of the  t im el ik e f orm f a ctors, s in ceth iscan b e  measu red f romth ep rot on sing l es p in s ym me trie s i n$e^+e^-\ top
\barp$ or $p\ba r  p \ to  \ ell \ba r \ell$ [@Bro ds ky:2003gs] .Car l Carl s o n, JohnHiller, Dae Sung Hwanga nd I [@ Bro dsky: 2003 gs] havesho wn tha t m e asurem ents o f the  p rot o n ’s po l a ri zat io n strongly d isc rimin at e be tween t he analytic formso f m odels which f itthep r ot onf or m  fa ct o rsi n  the spacelikeregion. In  p a rt icular, th e  si ng le-spin  asymme try n o rmal to  the scat tering pl an e me a s ure s the rela tive pha se differ e nce b e tw een t hetimeli ke  $G _E$ a nd $G_ M $ f orm f actors .The de pende nc e on pro ton polarization in the  timel ike r egi on is exp ect e d t o be larg e in  most mode ls,  of  theord e r ofseve r al  te n s ofperc e nt. The c o nt inu a t io n of the sp a c e lik e for m f a ctorsto t he timelike domai n  $t = s > 4 M^ 2_p$ i s v ery sens it ive to the ana lyt ic f orm of t he  form facto rs; in p ar t icula r it i s very  sensit i v et o theform  of  the PQCD  pr ed i ctions
 form_factor is_computed from states with_$\Delta L_z_=_\pm 1,$_PQCD_predicts $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim_1/Q^2 $ \[modulo_logarithms\]. A detailed analysis_shows that the_asymptotic_fall-off takes the form $F_2(Q^2)/F_1(Q^2) \sim \log^2 Q^2/Q^2$ [@Belitsky:2002kj]. One can also construct other models [@Brodsky:2003pw]_incorporating_the leading-twist_perturbative_QCD_prediction which are consistent with_the JLab polarization transfer data [@Jones:1999rz]_for the_ratio of proton Pauli and Dirac form factors._This_analysis can also_be extended to study the spin structure of scattering_amplitudes at large transverse momentum and_other processes which_are_dependent_on the scaling and_orbital angular momentum structure of light-front_wavefunctions. Recently, Afanasev, Carlson, Chen, Vanderhaeghen,_and I [@Chen:2004tw] have shown that the interfering_two-photon exchange contribution to elastic electron-proton_scattering, including inelastic intermediate states,_can account_for the discrepancy between Rosenbluth_and Jefferson Lab_spin transfer_polarization data [@Jones:1999rz].

A crucial_prediction of models for proton form_factors is the_relative phase of the timelike form_factors,_since this can_be_measured_from the_proton single spin_symmetries_in $e^+_e^-_\to p
\bar p$ or $p \bar_p_\to \ell \bar \ell$ [@Brodsky:2003gs]. Carl Carlson, John_Hiller, Dae Sung Hwang_and_I [@Brodsky:2003gs] have shown that_measurements of the proton’s polarization_strongly discriminate between the analytic forms_of models_which fit_the proton form factors in the spacelike region. In particular, the_single-spin asymmetry normal to the scattering_plane measures the relative_phase difference_between_the timelike $G_E$_and_$G_M$ form_factors. The dependence on proton polarization in_the timelike_region is expected to be large_in most models, of_the_order of several tens of percent._The continuation of the spacelike form_factors to the timelike domain_$t_=_s > 4 M^2_p$ is_very sensitive to the analytic form_of the form_factors; in particular it is very sensitive_to_the form of the PQCD predictions