 ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$, ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$, and two nonzero orders for the other polarisabilities. Proton results are colour-coded in red, neutron ones in blue, and isoscalar ones in green. The leading $\pi$N loops (green dotted) constitute LO in regime (i). The green dashed curves represent the complete isoscalar result at order $\delta^1$ relative to LO in regime (i), as detailed in Sect. \[sec:Finding-Theory-Uncertainties\] and eq. . No new contribution arises at this order for ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1E1}}}$, ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1M2}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1E2}}}$, and so this curve is absent there. In regime (ii), the solid and dashed curves are both only complete to LO, while the dotted curve is not even the full LO isovector result.

![(Colour online) Pion-mass dependence of the Baldin sum rule (top left), ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}-{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ (top right), ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ (bottom left) and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$ (bottom right). For ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$, error bars at ${\ensuremath{m_\pi^\text{phys}}}$ only reflect the uncertainties of the Baldin sum rules [@Olmos:2001; @Levchuk:1999zy]; in [$\chi$EFT]{}, such errors are input and are separate from the intrinsic [$\chi$EFT]{}errors. The [$\chi$EFT]{}uncertainty corridors of ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ are coloured differently to indicate that they are not used to derive corridors for ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}$ or ${\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$. The experimental value of ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}^{(\mathrm{p})}}}$ is indicated by the symbol $\protect\textcolor{red}{\bullet}$ [@Ahrens:2001qt; @Dutz]; this result’s uncertainty is smaller than the size of the symbol. Colour coding as in Fig. \[fig:allpols\]. See text for further details.[]{data-label="fig:constraints"}](Baldin+alphaminusbeta-combined-errors.pdf
$ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$, $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ and $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$, and two nonzero orders for the other polarisabilities. Proton results are colour - coded in red, neutron one in aristocratic, and isoscalar ones in green. The leading $ \pi$N loop (green dotted) appoint LO in regime (i). The fleeceable crash curves defend the complete isoscalar result at decree $ \delta^1 $ relative to LO in regime (i), as detailed in Sect.   \[sec: Finding - Theory - Uncertainties\ ] and eq.  . No new contribution originate at this order for $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{E1E1}}}$, $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{E1M2}}}$ and $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{M1E2}}}$, and so this curve is lacking there. In regime (ii), the solid and daunt curves are both merely complete to LO, while the dotted curve is not even the full LO isovector result. 

! [ (color online) Pion - mass dependence of the Baldin sum rule (top left), $ { \ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}-{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ (top right), $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ (bottom leftover) and $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$ (bottom right field). For $ { \ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$, erroneousness bars at $ { \ensuremath{m_\pi^\text{phys}}}$ only reflect the uncertainties of the Baldin sum rules   [ @Olmos:2001; @Levchuk:1999zy ]; in [ $ \chi$EFT ] { }, such errors are input and are separate from the intrinsic [ $ \chi$EFT]{}errors. The [ $ \chi$EFT]{}uncertainty corridor of $ { \ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ are color differently to indicate that they are not use to deduce corridors for $ { \ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}$ or $ { \ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$. The experimental value of $ { \ensuremath{\gamma_{0}^{(\mathrm{p})}}}$ is indicated by the symbol $ \protect\textcolor{red}{\bullet}$   [ @Ahrens:2001qt; @Dutz ]; this result ’s uncertainty is smaller than the size of the symbol. Colour coding as in Fig.   \[fig: allpols\ ]. See text for further details.[]{data - label="fig: constraints"}](Baldin+alphaminusbeta - blend - errors.pdf
 ${\enduremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$, ${\ensuremauh{\gamma_{0}}}$ and ${\ensurgmqth{\gamka_{\pi}}}$, ahd two nunzero orders for the other 'olaeisabulities. Proton results are cololr-coded ib rev, neutron ones ii blue, akb isoagalar ines in green. Jhe leading $\[i$N loops (greet aocted) constitute LO in regime (i). The gween daxhfd curves reprgsent ehe domplete isoscalar result at order $\delta^1$ gelative to LO in regime (i), as detailed in Sfct. \[sfc:Finding-Theory-Uncfrtainties\] qnd qw. . No new congribution arises at thjs order for ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1E1}}}$, ${\dnsurzmath{\gamma_{E1N2}}}$ qnd ${\gnsuremath{\ganma_{M1E2}}}$, and so this curve iv abseny there. In reglme (im), thw solid and dashed cucves are both only cjmplete tm MO, while the dottwd curvg is tot dcen tht fnll LO islvertor result.

![(Dolour onlibe) Pion-mass dependemcq of the Baldih sum wuje (top left), ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}-{\ensuremath{\btta_{M1}}}$ (fop right), ${\ensuremath{\gamna_{0}}}$ (bottom left) and ${\enduremath{\gwmma_{\pi}}}$ (bottom right). For ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensurematv{\beta_{J1}}}$, erxir bafw wt ${\ensuremath{m_\pi^\text{phys}}}$ only reflect the uncqdtsikties of the Balbin sum rules [@Olmps:2001; @Lrdchuk:1999zy]; in [$\chk$EFT]{}, sbdh errors are input wnd are sepaeate from the intrinsic [$\chi$EFT]{}errors. The [$\chi$EFT]{}uncernainry corridors of ${\enduremath{\alpka_{E1}}}+{\ensorematn{\beta_{M1}}}$ are coloured difyerentmy to indicwte that ffey are not used to darive corridors for ${\ensureiath{\alpha_{X1}}}$ or ${\znsuremagh{\beja_{M1}}}$. The experimenhal value of ${\ensuremath{\gwmma_{0}^{(\mcthrm{[})}}}$ is indicwted by the symbol $\protect\textcolor{red}{\bullet}$ [@Anrans:2001xt; @Dutz]; chis rcsult’s uncertaigty is smaller than tke sizd of the sjmbol. Colmur coding ws in Fig. \[fig:anppols\]. See teet for fuwthee derails.[]{dagx-label="fig:consttaints"}](Balbnn+alphamibusbeta-combined-errprs.kdr
${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$, ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$, and two nonzero the polarisabilities. Proton are colour-coded in and ones in green. leading $\pi$N loops dotted) constitute LO in regime (i). green dashed curves represent the complete isoscalar result at order $\delta^1$ relative to in regime (i), as detailed in Sect. \[sec:Finding-Theory-Uncertainties\] and eq. . No new arises this for ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1M2}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1E2}}}$, and so this curve is absent there. In regime (ii), the solid and curves are both only complete to LO, while dotted curve is not the full LO isovector result. online) dependence of Baldin rule left), ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}-{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ (top ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ (bottom left) and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$ (bottom right). For ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$, error bars at ${\ensuremath{m_\pi^\text{phys}}}$ only reflect the uncertainties the Baldin [@Olmos:2001; @Levchuk:1999zy]; [$\chi$EFT]{}, errors input and are the intrinsic [$\chi$EFT]{}errors. The [$\chi$EFT]{}uncertainty corridors coloured differently to indicate that they are not to derive for ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}$ or ${\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$. The experimental of ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}^{(\mathrm{p})}}}$ is indicated by the symbol $\protect\textcolor{red}{\bullet}$ @Dutz]; this result’s uncertainty is smaller than the size of the symbol. Colour coding as \[fig:allpols\]. See text for details.[]{data-label="fig:constraints"}](Baldin+alphaminusbeta-combined-errors.pdf
 ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$, ${\ensuremaTh{\gamma_{0}}}$ and ${\EnsurEmaTh{\gAmMa_{\pi}}}$, And tWo nonzero orderS For tHe other polarisabilitieS. ProtOn REsulTS aRe colOur-codeD In RED, neUtRoN onEs IN bLue, anD isOscalar Ones in greeN. ThE lEading $\pi$N looPS (gReen dotted) ConStitute LO in rEgiMe (i). The GrEen DAshed CurVes rePresenT The comPlete isosCaLAr resuLT at ordeR $\DElTa^1$ reLative to LO in regimE (I), aS Detailed in Sect. \[Sec:FinDiNG-THEOry-uncErtainties\] AnD eq. . No NEw contrIBuTION arISes at this ordeR for ${\ensuremATh{\gAmma_{E1E1}}}$, ${\EnSurEMath{\gaMma_{E1M2}}}$ AnD ${\EnsUremath{\gammA_{M1E2}}}$, aNd so this cUrve is ABsent thERe. In regIme (ii), tHe sOliD and DAsHeD cuRvES arE BoTh oNLy cOmplete tO Lo, wHile tHe doTTED CurvE is Not eVen thE full LO isovecTor ResuLT.

![(CoLour oNline) pion-MaSs depEndencE of thE BAldin sum rule (top Left), ${\EnsurematH{\alPhA_{E1}}}-{\eNsUremaTH{\beta_{M1}}}$ (Top RigHt), ${\ensurEmath{\gaMMa_{0}}}$ (bOtTOM LeFt) and ${\ensuremath{\gamMa_{\PI}}}$ (BoTtom righT). For ${\enSUrEmATh{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\EnSurEmatH{\BEta_{M1}}}$, eRror BArS at ${\ensurEmath{m_\PI^\tExT{phys}}}$ onLy ReflecT tHe uNceRtainTIes oF the BaLdin sum rUles [@OLMos:2001; @Levchuk:1999zy]; in [$\CHi$EFT]{}, such erroRS aRE InPUt anD arE separate frOm thE IntrInsiC [$\ChI$EFt]{}ErrorS. The [$\cHi$efT]{}UNcertainty corridors Of ${\EnsureMath{\aLpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremaTh{\beta_{M1}}}$ are COLOured difFereNTlY To indicate that They aRe not used tO Derive coRridoRs for ${\ensUremath{\alPHA_{E1}}}$ or ${\ensuRemAth{\BetA_{M1}}}$. THE ExPerimental valUE Of ${\enSuRemath{\gAmmA_{0}^{(\mathrm{P})}}}$ is IndIcaTed By The symbol $\Protect\tExTcOlOr{Red}{\BulleT}$ [@ahrens:2001qt; @duTz]; tHiS reSult’s UNcertaInty iS smaLlEr THan The size OF tHE SymbOl. coLour CodInG as in fig. \[fIG:alLpols\]. SeE text for fUrtHEr deTaIlS.[]{data-laBel="fig:constraInTs"}](Baldin+alPhAmiNusbetA-COmbined-eRrors.pdf
 ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M 1}}}$, ${\ ensur ema th{ \g amma _{0} }}$ and ${\ens u rema th{\gamma_{\pi}}}$, an d two  n o nzer o  o rders  for th e  o t h erpo la ris ab i li ties.  Pr oton re sults arecol ou r-coded in r e d,  neutron o nes  in blue, an d i soscal ar  on e s ingre en. T he lea d ing $\ pi$N loop s( greend otted)c o ns titu te LO in regime ( i ). The green dash ed cur ve s  r e p res ent  the compl et e iso s calar r e su l t ato rder $\delta^ 1$ relative toLO inre gim e  (i),as de ta i led  in Sect. \ [sec :Finding- Theory - Uncerta i nties\]  and e q.. N o ne w  c on tri bu t ion ar ise s  at  this or de rfor $ {\en s u r e math {\g amma _{E1E 1}}}$, ${\ens ure math { \ga mma_{ E1M2} }}$an d ${\ ensure math{ \g amma_{M1E2}}}$,  and  so thiscur ve  is  a bsent there.  In  re gime (i i), the sol id a n ddashed curves arebo t h  o nly comp lete t o  L O, while th edot tedc u rve i s no t  e ven thefull L O  i so vectorre sult.
! [(C olo ur on l ine)  Pion- mass dep enden c e of the Baldi n  sum rule (to p  l e f t) ,  ${\ ens uremath{\al pha_ { E1}} }-{\ e ns ure m ath{\ beta_ {M 1 }} } $ (top right), ${\e ns uremat h{\ga mma_{0}}}$ (b ottom left ) a nd ${\en sure m at h {\gamma_{\pi}} }$ (b ottom righ t ). For $ {\ens uremath{ \alpha_{E 1 } }}+{\ens ure mat h{\ bet a _ {M 1}}}$, errorb a rs a t${\ensu rem ath{m_\ pi^ \te xt{ phy s} }}$ onlyreflectth eun ce rta intie s  of theBa ldi nsum  rule s  [@Olm os:20 01;@L ev c huk :1999zy ] ;i n  [$\ ch i$ EFT] {},  s uch e rror s  ar e input  and aresep a rate  f ro m the i ntrinsic [$\c hi $EFT]{}err or s.The [$ \ c hi$EFT]{ }uncertainty corridorso f ${\en sur emath {\al pha_{E1}} }+{ \ensur ema t h{\bet a_{M1} }}$ a re  co l o uredd i ff ere nt ly to indi c a tethatth ey a re notused to derive cor r ido rs for ${\ens ure math { \ al pha _ {E 1 }}} $o r $ { \ ensuremath{\bet a_{M1}}}$.  T h eexperiment a l v al ue of $ {\ensur emath { \gamma_ {0}^{(\ma thrm{p})} }} $ is i ndi cated by t he symbo l $\prote c t\tex t co lor{r ed} {\bull et }$[@Ahr ens:20 0 1qt ; @Du tz]; t hi s resu lt’sun certaint y is smaller than the s ize of  thesym bol. Colo urc odi ng as inFig.  \[fig:all pol s\] . See  te x t for  fur t he r d e tails .[]{ d ata-label = "f ig: c o ns traints"}]( B a l din +alph ami n usbeta -com bined-errors.pdf
 ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1M1}}}$,_${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ and_${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$, and two nonzero_orders for_the_other polarisabilities._Proton_results are colour-coded_in red, neutron_ones in blue, and_isoscalar ones in_green._The leading $\pi$N loops (green dotted) constitute LO in regime (i). The green dashed_curves_represent the_complete_isoscalar_result at order $\delta^1$ relative_to LO in regime (i),_as detailed_in Sect. \[sec:Finding-Theory-Uncertainties\] and eq. . No new contribution arises_at_this order for_${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1E1}}}$, ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{E1M2}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{M1E2}}}$, and so this curve is_absent there. In regime (ii), the_solid and dashed_curves_are_both only complete to_LO, while the dotted curve is_not even the full LO isovector_result.

![(Colour online) Pion-mass dependence of the Baldin_sum rule (top left), ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}-{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ (top_right), ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}}}$ (bottom left) and_${\ensuremath{\gamma_{\pi}}}$ (bottom_right). For ${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$, error bars_at ${\ensuremath{m_\pi^\text{phys}}}$ only_reflect the_uncertainties of the_Baldin sum rules [@Olmos:2001; @Levchuk:1999zy]; in [$\chi$EFT]{},_such errors are_input and are separate from the_intrinsic_[$\chi$EFT]{}errors. The [$\chi$EFT]{}uncertainty_corridors_of_${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}+{\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$ are_coloured differently to_indicate_that they_are_not used to derive corridors for_${\ensuremath{\alpha_{E1}}}$_or ${\ensuremath{\beta_{M1}}}$. The experimental value of ${\ensuremath{\gamma_{0}^{(\mathrm{p})}}}$_is indicated by the_symbol_$\protect\textcolor{red}{\bullet}$ [@Ahrens:2001qt; @Dutz]; this result’s_uncertainty is smaller than the_size of the symbol. Colour coding_as in_Fig. \[fig:allpols\]. See_text for further details.[]{data-label="fig:constraints"}](Baldin+alphaminusbeta-combined-errors.pdf