\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[[\#1\#2]{}]{} \#1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \#3]{}]{} |\#1 \#1[\#1 ]{} \#1[\#1|]{} \#1[| \#1]{} \#1[| \#1|]{} \#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1]{} \#1\#2 \#1[.3ex]{} \#1\#2\#3[Nucl. Phys. B[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [\#1]{}B (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. Lett. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Ann. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rep. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Rev. Mod. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Comm. Math. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{}

Zachary Guralnik

[*Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093*]{}

The divergence of lepton and baryon currents in the Standard Model is independent of the fermion masses. For a single family, the baryon and lepton number anomaly is where $W^{\mu\nu}$ is the $SU(2)$ field strength and $B^{\mu\nu}$ is the $U(1)$ field strength. This differs greatly from the axial current equations of Q.E.D. because in Q.E.D. the production of axial charge depends critically on whether or not the electron is massive. I will begin by reviewing the reasons for this sensitivity. Then I will show why these reasons are not applicable to a spontaneously broken theory with a vector current anomaly, such as the standard model. The results give some insight into the production of baryon number in the standard model by sphalerons, which has been of much recent interest.

The divergence of the axial current in Q.E.D. \[\] is In a background gauge field the matrix element of the
\_[[\#1 ] { } ] { } ] { } \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2 ] { } ] { } ] { } \#1\#2[[\#1\#2 ] { } ] { } \#1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \#3 ] { } ] { } |\#1 \#1[\#1 ] { } \#1[\#1| ] { } \#1[| \#1 ] { } \#1[| \#1| ] { } \#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1 ] { } \#1\#2 \#1[.3ex ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Nucl. Phys. B[\#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [ \#1]{}B (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. Lett. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Ann. Phys. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rep. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Rev. Mod. Phys. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } \#1\#2\#3[Comm. Math. Phys. [ \#1 ] { } (\#2) \#3 ] { } 

 Zachary Guralnik 

 [ * Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 * ] { } 

 The divergence of lepton and baryon currents in the Standard Model is independent of the fermion masses. For a individual syndicate, the baryon and lepton number anomaly is where $ W^{\mu\nu}$ is the $ SU(2)$ field strength and $ B^{\mu\nu}$ is the $ U(1)$ field force. This differs greatly from the axial current equation of Q.E.D. because in Q.E.D. the production of axial care depends critically on whether or not the electron is massive. I will begin by review the reasons for this sensitivity. Then I will show why these reason are not applicable to a ad lib broken theory with a vector current anomaly, such as the standard exemplar. The results give some penetration into the production of baryon number in the standard model by sphalerons, which has been of much late interest. 

 The divergence of the axial current in Q.E.D.   \[\ ] is In a background bore field the matrix component of the
\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[[\#1\#2]{}]{} \#1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \#3]{}]{} |\#1 \#1[\#1 ]{} \#1[\#1|]{} \#1[| \#1]{} \#1[| \#1|]{} \#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1]{} \#1\#2 \#1[.3ex]{} \#1\#2\#3[Nugl. Phys. B[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [\#1]{}B (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phya. Rev. Legt. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Ann. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Eep. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Rev. Mod. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Comm. Matj. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{}

Zaciary Guralnik

[*Depedtment of Phyalcs, Uuitersity of Calinornia at Sdn Diego, La Jonlx, EA 92093*]{}

The divergence of lepton and baryjn currrnhs in the Stanqard Iodem is independent of the fermion maases. Fog a single family, the baryon and lepton numher wnomaly is where $W^{\lu\nu}$ is the $SU(2)$ sueld strengtf and $B^{\mu\nl}$ is the $U(1)$ rield strength. This differs grextly yrom the axuao cktrent equatiins os Q.E.D. becausc in Q.E.G. the ptoduction of awial rharte depends critically on whether or not the elecdrkn is massive. I wulo beghn bf rexuewkng tie deasond fkr this sehsitivity. Tyen I will show why trvxe reasons ade not a[plicable to a spontaneously broken themry with a vector current qnomaly, such as the sjandard moqel. The results give some insight into the producdion kw bcvnon vymher in the standard model by sphalerons, which gax neen of much reccnt interest.

The difeggrgce of the axkal cuxdeht in Q.E.D. \[\] is In a hackgroond gayge field the matrix element of the
\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[[\#1\#2]{}]{} \#1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \#3]{}]{} |\#1 \#1[\#1|]{} \#1]{} \#1[| \#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1]{} (\#2) \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [\#1]{}B \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [\#1]{} \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Ann. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rep. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Rev. Mod. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Comm. Math. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} Zachary Guralnik [*Department of University California San La Jolla, CA 92093*]{} The divergence of lepton and baryon currents in the Standard Model is of the fermion masses. For a single family, baryon and lepton number is where $W^{\mu\nu}$ is the field and $B^{\mu\nu}$ the field This differs greatly the axial current equations of Q.E.D. because in Q.E.D. the production of axial charge depends critically on or not is massive. will by the reasons for Then I will show why these applicable to a spontaneously broken theory with a current anomaly, as the standard model. The results some insight into the production of baryon number the standard model by sphalerons, which has been of much recent interest. The divergence of current in Q.E.D. \[\] In a background field matrix of
\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[[\#1\#2]{}]{} \#1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \#3]{}]{} |\#1 \#1[\#1 ]{} \#1[\#1|]{} \#1[| \#1]{} \#1[| \#1|]{} \#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1]{} \#1\#2 \#1[.3ex]{} \#1\#2\#3[Nucl. Phys. B[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [\#1]{}B (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[PHys. Rev. Lett. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[phys. REv. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[ANn. PHyS. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[PhyS. Rep. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[rev. Mod. Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Comm. mAth. PHys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{}

Zachary Guralnik

[*DepaRtmenT oF physICs, univeRsity of cAlIFOrnIa At san diEGo, la JolLa, Ca 92093*]{}

The divErgence of lEptOn And baryon curREnTs in the StaNdaRd Model is indEpeNdent oF tHe fERmion MasSes. FoR a singLE familY, the baryoN aND leptoN Number aNOMaLy is Where $W^{\mu\nu}$ is the $SU(2)$ FIeLD strength and $B^{\mU\nu}$ is tHe $u(1)$ FiELD stRenGth. This difFeRs greATly from THe AXIAl cURrent equationS of Q.E.D. becauSE in q.E.D. the PrOduCTion of Axial ChARge Depends critIcalLy on whethEr or noT The elecTRon is maSsive. I WilL beGin bY ReViEwiNg THe rEAsOns FOr tHis sensiTiViTy. TheN I wiLL SHOw whY thEse rEasonS are not applicAblE to a SPonTaneoUsly bRokeN tHeory With a vEctor CuRrent anomaly, sucH as tHe standarD moDeL. ThE rEsultS Give soMe iNsiGht into The prodUCtiOn OF BArYon number in the stanDaRD MoDel by sphAleronS, WhIcH Has been oF mUch ReceNT InterEst.

THE dIvergencE of the AXiAl Current In q.E.D. \[\] is IN a BacKgrOund gAUge fIeld thE matrix eLemenT Of the
\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_ [[\#1]{}]{ }\_[[ \#2 ]{} ]{ }]{}  \#1 \#2[[\#1\#2]{} ] {} \ #1\#2\#3[[\^2 \#1\#2 \ #3]{} ]{ }  |\# 1  \ #1[\# 1 ]{} \ # 1[ \ # 1|] {}  \ #1[ |\ #1 ]{} \ #1[ | \#1|] {} \#1 \#1 [1. 5e x-16.5mu \#1 ] {}  \#1\#2 \# 1[. 3ex]{} \#1\# 2\# 3[Nucl .Phy s . B[\ #1] {} (\ #2) \# 3 ]{} \# 1\#2\#3[P hy s . Lett .  [\#1]{ } B  ( \#2)  \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3 [ Ph y s. Rev. Lett.[\#1]{ }( \# 2 )  \# 3]{ } \#1\#2\# 3[ Phys. Rev. [\ # 1] { } (\# 2 ) \#3]{} \#1\ #2\#3[Ann.P hys . [\#1 ]{ } ( \ #2) \# 3]{}\# 1 \#2 \#3[Phys. R ep.[\#1]{} ( \#2) \ # 3]{} \# 1 \#2\#3[ Rev. M od.  Ph ys.[ \# 1] {}(\ # 2)\ #3 ]{} \#1 \#2\#3[C om m.  Math . Ph y s . [\#1 ]{}  (\# 2) \# 3]{}

Zachary  Gu raln i k
[*Dep artme nt o fPhysi cs, Un ivers it y of California  atSan Diego , L aJol la , CA9 2093*] {}
Th e diver gence o f  le pt o n an d baryon currentsin t he  Standar d Mode l  i si ndepende nt  of  the f ermio n ma s se s. For a  singl e  f am ily, th ebaryon  a ndlep ton n u mber  anoma ly is wh ere $ W ^{\mu\nu}$ ist he $SU(2)$ fi e ld s tr e ngth  an d $B^{\mu\n u}$i s th e $U ( 1) $ f i eld s treng th .  T h is differs greatlyfr om the  axia l current equ ations ofQ . E .D. beca usei nQ .E.D. the prod uctio n of axial charge d epend s critic ally on w h e ther ornot  th e e lec t r on  is massive.I will  b egin by  re viewing  th e r eas ons  f or this s ensitivi ty .Th en  Iwills how whyth ese  r eas ons a r e notappli cabl eto a s pontane o us l y  bro ke ntheo rywi th avect o r c urrentanomaly,suc h  asth estandar d model. There sults give  s ome  insig h t  into th e production of baryonn umber i n t he st anda rd modelbysphale ron s , whic h hasbeenof  mu c h  rece n t  i nte re st.

The d i v erg enceof  the  axialcurrent in Q.E.D.\ [\]  is In a back gro undg a ug e f i el d  th em atr i x  element of the 
\_[[\#1]{}]{}]{} \#1\#2[\_[[\#1]{}]{}\_[[\#2]{}]{}]{}_\#1\#2[[\#1\#2]{}]{} \#1\#2\#3[[\^2_\#1\#2 \#3]{}]{} |\#1 \#1[\#1_]{} \#1[\#1|]{}_\#1[|_\#1]{} \#1[|_\#1|]{}_\#1 \#1[1.5ex-16.5mu \#1]{}_\#1\#2 \#1[.3ex]{} \#1\#2\#3[Nucl._Phys. B[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{}_\#1\#2\#3[Phys. Lett. [\#1]{}B_(\#2)_\#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. Lett. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Phys. Rev. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Ann. Phys._[\#1]{}_(\#2) \#3]{}_\#1\#2\#3[Phys._Rep._[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Rev. Mod._Phys. [\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{} \#1\#2\#3[Comm._Math. Phys._[\#1]{} (\#2) \#3]{}

Zachary Guralnik

[*Department of Physics, University of_California_at San Diego,_La Jolla, CA 92093*]{}

The divergence of lepton and baryon_currents in the Standard Model is_independent of the_fermion_masses._For a single family,_the baryon and lepton number anomaly_is where $W^{\mu\nu}$ is the $SU(2)$_field strength and $B^{\mu\nu}$ is the $U(1)$_field strength. This differs greatly from_the axial current equations of_Q.E.D. because_in Q.E.D. the production of_axial charge depends_critically on_whether or not_the electron is massive. I will_begin by reviewing_the reasons for this sensitivity. Then_I_will show why_these_reasons_are not_applicable to a_spontaneously_broken theory_with_a vector current anomaly, such as_the_standard model. The results give some insight_into the production of_baryon_number in the standard_model by sphalerons, which has_been of much recent interest.

The divergence_of the_axial current_in Q.E.D. \[\] is In a background gauge field the matrix element_of the