 but it does cover the entire space of wavefunctions.

Due to the symmetries of the wavefunction \[eq:wfsyms1\] [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) = [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) and thus \[eq:wfsyms2\] [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = 14 ( [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) ) one can simply replace ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) 
\to {\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ to go from the ${\mathcal{L}}$ to the ${\mathcal{F}}$ basis. It may therefore not be immediately obvious how eq.  simplifies the results. Indeed, it requires a few more steps to showcase the advantages of a symmetrised basis.

Firstly, the wavefunction in the ${\mathcal{L}}$ basis contains functions whose indices feature an odd number of the letter $a$. Their leading-weight components are antisymmetric under $z \to 1/z$ because z = - 1/z Converted to ${\mathcal{F}}$ functions they are hence zero at symbol level or, in other words, equal to products of lower-weight and zeta numbers. This can be turned into a recursive algorithm that successively removes all odd-$a$ functions. Schematically,

1.  Consider the wavefunction at a given order and replace ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) \to {\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$

2.  Choose an ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ where $\sigma$ contains an odd number of $a$ letters. Plug in definition and rewrite as functions of $z,{\bar{z}}$ using the rules in appendix \[app:svhplvariables\]. The resulting will be of lower weight than the original ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma$, multiplied by zeta numbers.

3.  Replace again ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) 
        \to {\mathcal{
but it does cover the entire space of wavefunctions. 

 Due to the symmetries of the wavefunction \[eq: wfsyms1\ ] [ \_]{}(z,[|[z ] { } ] { }) = [ \_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) = [ \_]{}(1 / z,1/[|[z ] { } ] { }) = [ \_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1 / z) and therefore \[eq: wfsyms2\ ] [ \_]{}(z,[|[z ] { } ] { }) = 14 ([ \_]{}(z,[|[z ] { } ] { }) + [ \_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [ \_]{}(1 / z,1/[|[z ] { } ] { }) + [ \_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1 / z) ) one can plainly replace $ { \mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z } }) 
 \to { \mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ to go from the $ { \mathcal{L}}$ to the $ { \mathcal{F}}$ footing. It may therefore not be immediately obvious how eq.    simplify the results. Indeed, it requires a few more dance step to showcase the advantage of a symmetrised basis. 

 Firstly, the wavefunction in the $ { \mathcal{L}}$ basis contain functions whose indices sport an curious number of the letter $ a$. Their leading - weight components are antisymmetric under $ z \to 1 / z$ because z = - 1 / omega Converted to $ { \mathcal{F}}$ functions they are hence zero at symbol grade or, in other words, adequate to products of low - weight and zeta numbers. This can be turned into a recursive algorithm that successively removes all odd-$a$ functions. Schematically, 

 1.   study the wavefunction at a given order and replace $ { \mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z } }) \to { \mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ 

 2.   Choose an $ { \mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ where $ \sigma$ contains an odd numeral of $ a$ letters. Plug in definition and rewrite as functions of $ z,{\bar{z}}$ using the rules in appendix   \[app: svhplvariables\ ]. The resulting will be of lower weight than the original $ { \mathcal{F}}_\sigma$, multiplied by zeta numbers. 

 3.   supplant again $ { \mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z } }) 
         \to { \mathcal {
 buh it does cover the entive space of waveyynctiois.

Due tk the syometries of the wavefunction \[ew:wfsyns1\] [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) = [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) and ghus \[eq:wfdyms2\] [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = 14 ( [\_]{}(z,[|[e]{}]{}) + [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) ) onx can simply rsilace ${\nathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\nar{z}}) 
\to {\matvcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{s}})$ go go from the ${\mathcal{L}}$ to the ${\mathcaj{F}}$ basix. Lt may therefote nou bq imjvdlately obvious how eq.  simplifies the revults. Indeed, ot requires a few more steos tl showcase the advwntages of q syinetrised basks.

Firstly, uhz wavefunctjon in the ${\mathcal{L}}$ basis contakns fbnctions whisw ijgices featuce an jdd number on the latter $a$. Their leading-eeijht xomponents are antisykmetric under $z \to 1/z$ becausa v = - 1/z Converted to ${\marhxal{F}}$ xuncdionr thdy zrx hsnce zfro at symbol level or, ib other words, equal tj products of mower-wqidht and zeta numbers. This can be turned info a recursive algorithn that successively rgmoves all odd-$a$ functions. Schematically,

1.  Consider the wavefgnctikv au q givdb lrder and replace ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) \to {\mathcwm{F}}_\xinma(z,{\bar{z}})$

2.  Choose an ${\mathcal{G}}_\slgkw(z,{\bar{z}})$ where $\rigma$ eknfains an odd numbeg of $a$ jettees. Plug ig deginition and rewrite as funxtions of $z,{\bcr{z}}$ using the rules iu appendix \[ap':svhplfarianles\]. The resulting will be kf lower welght than ghe original ${\matfcak{F}}_\vigma$, multiplied by zeta ntmbers.

3.  Rxplacz again ${\oathval{L}}_\sidma(z,{\bar{z}}) 
        \to {\mathcal{
but it does cover the entire space Due the symmetries the wavefunction \[eq:wfsyms1\] = and thus \[eq:wfsyms2\] = 14 ( + [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) one can simply replace ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) \to {\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ to go from the ${\mathcal{L}}$ to ${\mathcal{F}}$ basis. It may therefore not be immediately obvious how eq. simplifies the Indeed, requires few steps to showcase the advantages of a symmetrised basis. Firstly, the wavefunction in the ${\mathcal{L}}$ basis functions whose indices feature an odd number of letter $a$. Their leading-weight are antisymmetric under $z \to because = - Converted ${\mathcal{F}}$ they are hence at symbol level or, in other words, equal to products of lower-weight and zeta numbers. This can turned into algorithm that removes odd-$a$ Schematically, 1. Consider at a given order and replace 2. Choose an ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$ where $\sigma$ contains an number of letters. Plug in definition and rewrite functions of $z,{\bar{z}}$ using the rules in appendix The resulting will be of lower weight than the original ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma$, multiplied by zeta numbers. again ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) \to {\mathcal{
 but it does cover the entire spAce of wavefUnctiOns.

due To The sYmmeTries of the waveFUnctIon \[eq:wfsyms1\] [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) = [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) and Thus \[eQ:wFSyms2\] [\_]{}(Z,[|[Z]{}]{}) = 14 ( [\_]{}(z,[|[Z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}(1/[|[Z]{}]{},1/z) ) one caN SiMPLy rEpLaCe ${\mAtHCaL{L}}_\sigMa(z,{\Bar{z}}) 
\to {\mAthcal{F}}_\sigMa(z,{\BaR{z}})$ to go from thE ${\MaThcal{L}}$ to thE ${\maThcal{F}}$ basis. IT maY thereFoRe nOT be imMedIatelY obvioUS how eq.  SimplifieS tHE resulTS. Indeed, IT ReQuirEs a few more steps to SHoWCase the advantaGes of a SyMMeTRIseD baSis.

Firstly, ThE waveFUnction IN tHE ${\MAthCAl{L}}$ basis contaIns functionS WhoSe indiCeS feATure an Odd nuMbER of The letter $a$. THeir Leading-weIght coMPonents ARe antisYmmetrIc uNdeR $z \to 1/Z$ BeCaUse Z = - 1/z cOnvERtEd tO ${\MatHcal{F}}$ funCtIoNs theY are HENCE zerO at SymbOl levEl or, in other woRds, EquaL To pRoducTs of lOwer-WeIght aNd zeta NumbeRs. this can be turned Into A recursivE alGoRitHm That sUCcessiVelY reMoves alL odd-$a$ fuNCtiOnS. sCHeMatically,

1.  Consider tHe WAVeFunction At a givEN oRdER and replAcE ${\maThcaL{l}}_\Sigma(Z,{\bar{Z}}) \To {\Mathcal{F}}_\Sigma(z,{\BAr{Z}})$

2.  CHoose an ${\MaThcal{F}}_\SiGma(Z,{\baR{z}})$ wheRE $\sigMa$ contAins an odD numbER of $a$ letters. PluG In definition aND rEWRiTE as fUncTions of $z,{\bar{Z}}$ usiNG the RuleS In AppENdix \[aPp:svhPlVArIAbles\]. The resulting wiLl Be of loWer weIght than the orIginal ${\mathCAL{f}}_\sigma$, muLtipLIeD By zeta numbers.

3.  REplacE again ${\mathCAl{L}}_\sigma(Z,{\bar{z}}) 
        \To {\mathcaL{
 but it does cover the ent ire spaceof wa vef unc ti ons. 

Du e to the symme t ries  of the wavefunction \ [eq:w fs y ms1\ ]  [ \_]{} (z,[|[z ] {} ] { })=[\ _]{ }( [ |[ z]{}] {}, z) = [\ _]{}(1/z,1 /[| [z ]{}]{}) = [\ _ ]{ }(1/[|[z]{ }]{ },1/z) and t hus  \[eq: wf sym s 2\] [ \_] {}(z, [|[z]{ } ]{}) =  14 ( [\_ ]{ } (z,[|[ z ]{}]{}) +  [ \_]{ }([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\ _ ]{}(1/z,1/[|[z ]{}]{} )+  [ \ _ ]{} (1/ [|[z]{}]{} ,1 /z) ) one can si m p l y r e place ${\math cal{L}}_\si g ma( z,{\ba r{ z}} )  
\to{\mat hc a l{F }}_\sigma(z ,{\b ar{z}})$to gof rom the ${\math cal{L} }$tothe$ {\ ma thc al { F}} $  b asi s . I t may th er ef ore n ot b e i m medi ate ly o bviou s how eq.  si mpl ifie s  th e res ults.  Ind ee d, it  requi res a  f ew more steps t o sh owcase th e a dv ant ag es of a symm etr ise d basis .

Firs t ly,  t h e wa vefunction in the${ \ m at hcal{L}} $ basi s  c on t ains fun ct ion s wh o s e ind ices fe ature an  odd n u mb er  of the  l etter$a $.The ir le a ding -weigh t compon entsa re antisymmetr i c under $z \t o  1 / z $b ecau sez = - 1/z C onve r tedto $ { \m ath c al{F} }$ fu nc t io n s they are hence ze ro  at sy mbollevel or, inother word s , equal to  pro d uc t s of lower-wei ght a nd zeta nu m bers. Th is ca n be tur ned intoa recursiv e a lgo rit hmt h at  successively r emov es  all od d-$ a$ func tio ns.  Sc hem at ically,
1.  Cons id er  t he  wa vefun c tion atagiv en  or der a n d repl ace $ {\ma th ca l {L} }_\sigm a (z , { \bar {z }} ) \t o { \m athca l{F} } _\s igma(z, {\bar{z}} )$2. Ch oo se an $ {\mathcal{F}} _\ sigma(z,{\ ba r{z }})$ w h e re $\sig ma$ contains an odd num b er of $ a$lette rs.Plug in d efi nition  an d  rewri te asfunct io nso f  $z,{ \ b ar {z} }$  using the r ule s inap pend ix \[ap p:svhplvariables\] .  Th e resulting w ill  beo f  l owe r  w e igh tt han t he original ${\ mathcal{F} }_ \ si gma$, mult i pli ed  by zet a numbe rs.
3 .  Repl ace again  ${\mathc al {L}} _ \ sig ma(z,{\bar {z}}) 
       \t o  {\ma t hc al{
 but_it does_cover the entire space_of wavefunctions.

Due_to_the symmetries_of_the wavefunction \[eq:wfsyms1\]_[\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z)_= [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) = [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z)_and thus \[eq:wfsyms2\]_[\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{})_= 14 ( [\_]{}(z,[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}([|[z]{}]{},z) + [\_]{}(1/z,1/[|[z]{}]{}) + [\_]{}(1/[|[z]{}]{},1/z) ) one can simply_replace_${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) 
\to_{\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$_to_go from the ${\mathcal{L}}$ to_the ${\mathcal{F}}$ basis. It may_therefore not_be immediately obvious how eq.  simplifies the results._Indeed,_it requires a_few more steps to showcase the advantages of a_symmetrised basis.

Firstly, the wavefunction in the_${\mathcal{L}}$ basis contains_functions_whose_indices feature an odd_number of the letter $a$. Their_leading-weight components are antisymmetric under $z_\to 1/z$ because z = - 1/z_Converted to ${\mathcal{F}}$ functions they are_hence zero at symbol level_or, in_other words, equal to products_of lower-weight and_zeta numbers._This can be_turned into a recursive algorithm that_successively removes all_odd-$a$ functions. Schematically,

1.  Consider the_wavefunction_at a given_order_and_replace ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})_\to {\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$

2. _Choose_an ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}})$_where_$\sigma$ contains an odd number of_$a$_letters. Plug in definition and rewrite as_functions of $z,{\bar{z}}$ using_the_rules in appendix \[app:svhplvariables\]. The_resulting will be of lower_weight than the original ${\mathcal{F}}_\sigma$, multiplied_by zeta_numbers.

3. _Replace again ${\mathcal{L}}_\sigma(z,{\bar{z}}) 
       _\to {\mathcal{