. For the ultracompact systems, the calculations were generally terminated just after the period minimum when the secondaries have become fully degenerate. In systems where the secondary becomes a He or a HeCO white dwarf, the calculations are continued either up to the point where the secondary has settled on the cooling sequence for degenerate stars or until the beginning of the first hydrogen shell flash (although in many cases, we continued the calculations through all flashes). In systems that experience a dynamical instability, the calculations were generally terminated when the secondaries overfilled their Roche lobes by a factor of 1.5. In cases, where the maximum overflow factor was less than 1.5, we continued the calculations (pretending that the systems did not experience a spiral-in phase) just as for the systems that were dynamically stable (these are the systems marked with ‘?’ in the ‘Type’ column).

The next three parameters in the first row give the average and the maximum mass-transfer rate, $<\dot{M}>$ and $\dot{M}_{\rm max}$ (in [[$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$]{}]{}), respectively, and the total duration of the mass-transfer phase for each sequence, $\Delta t_{\dot{M}}$ (in yr), where we considered only phases where $\dot{M}$ exceeded a rate of $10^{-12}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The last column in the first row indicates whether the secondary experienced hydrogen shell flashes before settling onto the sequence for degenerate stars.

In the second row, the first four parameters apply to systems that evolve towards short periods: column ‘gap’ gives the range of orbital periods (in hr) for the sequences that experienced a period gap; $M_2^{\rm min}$ gives the secondary mass (in [[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{}) at the period minimum, $P_{\rm min}$ (in min), and $X_s^{\rm min}$ the surface hydrogen abundance at the point.

The last 6 columns apply to systems that (may) experience dynamical mass transfer, where $f_{\rm over}$ is the maximum overflow factor (i.e., the ratio of the secondary radius to the Roche-lobe radius), $t_{\rm atm}$ and $t_{\rm rad}$ give the duration of phases with ‘atmospheric’ and ‘radiative’ Roche-lobe overflow (in kyr), respectively, before the onset of the dynamical instability. Finally
. For the ultracompact systems, the calculations were generally terminated barely after the time period minimum when the secondaries have become fully degenerate. In system where the secondary becomes a He or a HeCO ashen gnome, the calculations are continued either up to the point where the secondary has settled on the cool sequence for degenerate asterisk or until the beginning of the first hydrogen shell flash (although in many cases, we continued the calculation through all flashes). In systems that experience a dynamic instability, the calculations were by and large terminated when the secondary overfilled their Roche lobes by a factor of 1.5. In cases, where the maximum flood factor was less than 1.5, we continued the calculations (pretending that the systems did not experience a coiling - in phase) merely as for the systems that were dynamically stable (these are the systems marked with ‘? ’ in the ‘ Type ’ column). 

 The next three parameters in the first row move over the average and the maximum mass - transportation pace, $ < \dot{M}>$ and $ \dot{M}_{\rm max}$ (in [ [ $ \,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$ ] { } ] { }), respectively, and the total duration of the mass - transfer phase for each sequence, $ \Delta t_{\dot{M}}$ (in yr), where we regard only phases where $ \dot{M}$ exceeded a rate of $ 10^{-12}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The final column in the first row indicates whether the secondary experienced hydrogen shell flashes before settle onto the sequence for degenerate stars. 

 In the second row, the inaugural four parameters practice to systems that evolve towards short periods: column ‘ gap ’ give the range of orbital periods (in hr) for the sequence that experienced a period gap; $ M_2^{\rm min}$ gives the junior-grade mass (in [ [ $ \,M_\odot$ ] { } ] { }) at the period minimum, $ P_{\rm min}$ (in min), and $ X_s^{\rm min}$ the surface hydrogen abundance at the point. 

 The last 6 column apply to organization that (may) experience dynamic mass transfer, where $ f_{\rm over}$ is the maximal overflow factor (i.e., the ratio of the secondary radius to the Roche - lobe spoke), $ t_{\rm atm}$ and $ t_{\rm rad}$ give the duration of phases with ‘ atmospheric ’ and ‘ radiative ’ Roche - lobe overflow (in kyr), respectively, before the attack of the dynamical instability. Finally
. Fog the ultracompact systeos, the calculatnins wece genedally tefminated just after the perild mininum when the secondarids have bvcome fuloy dtgenerate. In systxjs wherc the decoudery becomes a Hg or a HeCO fhite dwarf, tha zapculations are continued either up eo the lolnt where the fecomqary has settled on the cooling sequende for vegenerate starx or until the beginning ov thf first hydrogen sjell flash (qlthjygh in many zases, we continued the calculations through all flashds). In systems tyar edkerience a dbnamicwl instabilibj, the cdlculatoons were genevally teeminated when the secmndaries overfilleq their Rmcke lobes by a factor if 1.5. In wasev, whdee ghe mexijum ovfrfmow factor was less tyan 1.5, we continued tne bslculations (lretenqigg that the systems did not experience d sliral-in phase) just as fir the systems that wgre dynamisally stable (these are the systems marked with ‘?’ it the ‘Gypt’ gjuymj).

The next three parameters in the first row gybe tme average and tme maximum mass-tramsvet rate, $<\dot{M}>$ ana $\dot{M}_{\xj jax}$ (in [[$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$]{}]{}), resoectivejy, ane the totwl diration of the mass-transfer phase for ecch sequence, $\Delta t_{\dlt{M}}$ (in yr), wkere wg consodered only phases wherz $\dot{M}$ exceeded a rate of $10^{-12}{{\jcox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The lxst cmlumn in the first row indycates whxther the sezondsry ex[erienced jydronan shell flashes bffore sattling onho the sequence for degenerate stars.

In the sevotd gow, the fnrst fpur parameterf apply to sysjems that evolxe towards short 'eriods: coluin ‘gap’ gives dje range of mrbital [eriids (un hr) fuf the sequencex that exiexienced a period gap; $M_2^{\rm mik}$ givgs the secondary nasw (in [[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{}) at tne oeryof kighmum, $P_{\rm min}$ (in oin), snd $X_r^{\rm min}$ the rurfsce hydrogen abundanwe af the point.

The lasy 6 columns apply tj systems thay (may) experience djnamiral mars trsnsser, where $f_{\rm over}$ is the maxijum overfpow factor (i.e., tre rqtio of the xecondary radius to the Roche-lobe radiuw), $t_{\rm atm}$ and $t_{\rm ead}$ give the duratipk of phases xith ‘aemospheriw’ and ‘radiative’ Rochw-lobe overflow (in kyr), respectively, befkre tha onsft of the dynamical instability. Finally
. For the ultracompact systems, the calculations terminated after the minimum when the In where the secondary a He or HeCO white dwarf, the calculations are either up to the point where the secondary has settled on the cooling for degenerate stars or until the beginning of the first hydrogen shell flash in cases, continued calculations through all flashes). In systems that experience a dynamical instability, the calculations were generally terminated the secondaries overfilled their Roche lobes by a of 1.5. In cases, the maximum overflow factor was than we continued calculations that systems did not a spiral-in phase) just as for the systems that were dynamically stable (these are the systems marked ‘?’ in column). The three in first row give and the maximum mass-transfer rate, $<\dot{M}>$ (in [[$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$]{}]{}), respectively, and the total duration of mass-transfer phase each sequence, $\Delta t_{\dot{M}}$ (in yr), we considered only phases where $\dot{M}$ exceeded a of $10^{-12}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The last column in the first row indicates whether the secondary experienced hydrogen before settling onto the for degenerate stars. the row, first parameters apply systems that evolve towards short periods: column ‘gap’ gives the range orbital periods (in hr) for the sequences that experienced a $M_2^{\rm gives the secondary (in [[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{}) at the minimum, min}$ (in min), and the hydrogen point. last columns apply to systems (may) experience dynamical mass transfer, $f_{\rm over}$ is the ratio of the secondary radius to the Roche-lobe $t_{\rm atm}$ and $t_{\rm rad}$ give the of phases with ‘atmospheric’ and ‘radiative’ Roche-lobe overflow (in kyr), respectively, before onset of instability. Finally
. For the ultracompact systems, The calculaTions WerE geNeRallY terMinated just aftER the Period minimum when the seCondaRiES havE BeCome fUlly degENeRATe. IN sYsTemS wHErE the sEcoNdary beComes a He or A HecO White dwarf, thE CaLculations Are Continued eitHer Up to thE pOinT Where The SeconDary haS SettleD on the cooLiNG sequeNCe for deGENeRate Stars or until the beGInNIng of the first hYdrogeN sHElL FLasH (alThough in maNy Cases, WE continUEd THE CalCUlations throuGh all flasheS). in sYstems ThAt eXPerienCe a dyNaMIcaL instabilitY, the CalculatiOns werE GeneralLY terminAted whEn tHe sEconDArIeS ovErFIllED tHeiR rocHe lobes bY a FaCtor oF 1.5. In cASES, WherE thE maxImum oVerflow factor Was Less THan 1.5, We conTinueD the CaLculaTions (pRetenDiNg that the systemS did Not experiEncE a SpiRaL-in phASe) just As fOr tHe systeMs that wERe dYnAMICaLly stable (these are tHe SYStEms markeD with ‘?’ iN ThE ‘TYPe’ column).

thE neXt thREE paraMeteRS iN the firsT row giVE tHe Average AnD the maXiMum MasS-tranSFer rAte, $<\dot{m}>$ and $\dot{M}_{\Rm max}$ (IN [[$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$]{}]{}), respecTIvely, and the toTAl DURaTIon oF thE mass-transfEr phASe foR eacH SeQueNCe, $\DelTa t_{\doT{M}}$ (IN yR), Where we considered onLy Phases Where $\Dot{M}$ exceeded a Rate of $10^{-12}{{\mbox}{$\,m_\ODOt\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The lAst cOLuMN in the first row IndicAtes whetheR The seconDary eXperiencEd hydrogeN SHell flasHes BefOre SetTLInG onto the sequeNCE for DeGeneratE stArs.

In thE seConD roW, thE fIrst four pArameterS aPpLy To SysTems tHAt evolve ToWarDs ShoRt perIOds: colUmn ‘gaP’ givEs ThE RanGe of orbITaL PErioDs (In Hr) foR thE sEquenCes tHAt eXperienCed a perioD gaP; $m_2^{\rm mIn}$ GiVes the sEcondary mass (iN [[$\,M_\Odot$]{}]{}) at the pErIod MinimuM, $p_{\Rm min}$ (in mIn), and $X_s^{\rm min}$ the surface hYDrogen aBunDance At thE point.

The LasT 6 columNs aPPly to sYstems That (mAy) ExpERIence DYNaMicAl Mass transfER, WheRe $f_{\rm OvEr}$ is The maxiMum overflow factor (i.E., The Ratio of the secOndAry rADIuS to THe rOchE-lOBe rADIus), $t_{\rm atm}$ and $t_{\rm Rad}$ give the DuRAtIon of phaseS WitH ‘aTmospheRic’ and ‘rAdiatIVe’ Roche-Lobe overfLow (in kyr), rEsPectIVEly, Before the oNset of thE dynamicaL InstaBIlIty. FiNalLy
. For the ultracompact sys tems, thecalcu lat ion swere  gen erally termina t ed j ust after the period m inimu mw hent he  seco ndaries ha v e  be co me  fu ll y  d egene rat e. In s ystems whe reth e secondaryb ec omes a Heora HeCO white  dw arf, t he  ca l culat ion s are  conti n ued ei ther up t ot he poi n t where t he  sec ondary has settle d  o n  the cooling s equenc ef or d ege ner ate starsor  unti l  the be g in n i n g o f  the first hy drogen shel l  fl ash (a lt hou g h in m any c as e s,we continue d th e calcula tionst hrougha ll flas hes).Insys tems th at  ex pe r ien c ea d y nam ical ins ta bi lity,  the c a l cula tio ns w ere g enerally term ina tedw hen  thesecon dari es  over filled  thei rRoche lobes bya fa ctor of 1 .5.  I n c as es, w h ere th e m axi mum ove rflow f a cto rw a s  l ess than 1.5, we c on t i nu ed the c alcula t io ns (pretend in g t hatt h e sys tems di d not ex perien c easpiral- in  phase )jus t a s for thesystem s that w ere d y namically stab l e (these aret he s ys t emsmar ked with ‘? ’ in the‘Typ e ’col u mn).
Thene x tt hree parameters inth e firs t row  give the ave rage and t h e maximummass - tr a nsfer rate, $< \dot{ M}>$ and $ \ dot{M}_{ \rm m ax}$ (in  [[$\,M_\ o d ot\,$yr$ ^{- 1}$ ]{} ]{} ) ,  r espectively,a n d th etotal d ura tion of  th e m ass -tr an sfer phas e for ea ch  s eq ue nce , $\D e lta t_{\ do t{M }} $ ( in yr ) , wher e wecons id er e d o nly pha s es w here  $ \d ot{M }$ex ceede d ar ate  of $10 ^{-12}{{\ mbo x }{$\ ,M _\ odot\,$ yr$^{-1}$}}$.  T he last co lu mnin the f irst row  indicates whether thes econdar y e xperi ence d hydroge n s hell f las h es bef ore se ttlin gont o the s e q ue nce  f or degener a t e s tars. 
In t he seco nd row, the firstf our  parameters a ppl y to s ys tem s  t h atev o lve t owards short pe riods: col um n  ‘ gap’ gives the  r ange of  orbita l per i ods (in  hr) forthe seque nc es t h a t e xperienced  a perio d gap; $M _ 2^{\r m  m in}$giv es the  s eco ndary  mass( in[[$\, M_\odo t$ ]{}]{} ) atth e period  minimum, $P_{\rm min}$  (in m in),and  $X_s^{\r m m i n}$  the surf acehydrogen a bun dan ce at  th e  poin t.
T he  la s t 6 c olum n s apply t o  s yst e m sthat (may)e x p eri encedyn a micalmass  transfer, where$ f_{\rm over}$is t h e  ma xim u m ov er flow factor (i .e. ,t h e ratioof  the second ary radi us to th e Roch e-lobe  radius ) ,  $ t _{\rmatm} $ a nd $t_{\r m r ad } $ giveth ed uratio n of  p haseswith ‘ a tmos p h eric’ and ‘radia tive’ R oche- l obe  over fl ow (ink yr),  respectiv ely, before  the o nset  of t he dyna mi cal in sta bi lity. Fina l ly
. For_the ultracompact_systems, the calculations were_generally terminated_just_after the_period_minimum when the_secondaries have become_fully degenerate. In systems_where the secondary_becomes_a He or a HeCO white dwarf, the calculations are continued either up to_the_point where_the_secondary_has settled on the cooling_sequence for degenerate stars or_until the_beginning of the first hydrogen shell flash (although_in_many cases, we_continued the calculations through all flashes). In systems that_experience a dynamical instability, the calculations_were generally terminated_when_the_secondaries overfilled their Roche_lobes by a factor of 1.5._In cases, where the maximum overflow_factor was less than 1.5, we continued_the calculations (pretending that the systems_did not experience a spiral-in_phase) just_as for the systems that_were dynamically stable_(these are_the systems marked_with ‘?’ in the ‘Type’ column).

The_next three parameters_in the first row give the_average_and the maximum_mass-transfer_rate,_$<\dot{M}>$ and_$\dot{M}_{\rm max}$ (in_[[$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$]{}]{}),_respectively, and_the_total duration of the mass-transfer phase_for_each sequence, $\Delta t_{\dot{M}}$ (in yr), where_we considered only phases_where_$\dot{M}$ exceeded a rate_of $10^{-12}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$. The last column_in the first row indicates whether_the secondary_experienced hydrogen_shell flashes before settling onto the sequence for degenerate stars.

In the_second row, the first four parameters_apply to systems that_evolve towards_short_periods: column ‘gap’_gives_the range_of orbital periods (in hr) for the_sequences that_experienced a period gap; $M_2^{\rm min}$_gives the secondary mass_(in_[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{}) at the period minimum, $P_{\rm_min}$ (in min), and $X_s^{\rm min}$_the surface hydrogen abundance at_the_point.

The_last 6 columns apply to_systems that (may) experience dynamical mass_transfer, where $f_{\rm_over}$ is the maximum overflow factor (i.e.,_the_ratio of the secondary radius to_the_Roche-lobe radius), $t_{\rm atm}$ and $t_{\rm_rad}$_give_the duration of phases with_‘atmospheric’ and ‘radiative’ Roche-lobe overflow (in_kyr), respectively, before the onset of the dynamical instability._Finally