 the standard perfect-obstruction theory on the moduli space. The reduction by this quotient defines the reduced virtual class, see [@KT] for a modern treatment of this process.

[^6]: We work here with an elliptically fibered K3 surface to obtain a uniform presentation of our results. By deformation invariance, our results imply parallel statements for any non-singular projective K3 surface with primitive curve class $\beta$.

[^7]: We follow the convention of Section \[Section:Relative\_Gromov\_Witten\_theory\_of\_P1K3\] or equivalently of [@MP].

[^8]: This is parallel to the breaking of the reduced virtual class in the K3 case when degenerating to two rational elliptic surfaces, see [@MPT Section 4].

[^9]: If the curve is disconnected it must have precisely two components of degree $1$ over ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ each. Moreover, one component carries the insertion ${{\mathsf{p}}}\otimes \omega$ and contributes $1$, the other carries all the insertions $F \boxtimes \omega$ and contributes $\Delta(q)^{-1}$.

[^10]: See Property (b).

[^11]: We may also use Proposition \[Proposition\_take\_out\_div\] below to reduce to Proposition \[vanishing1\].

[^12]: For example, see [@EZ page 105] for the crucial coefficient bound.

[^13]: If $\eta = \{ (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}) \}$, then $\eta^{\vee} = \{ (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}^{\vee}) \}$ where $\{ \gamma_i^{\vee} \}$ is the basis dual to $\{ \gamma_i \}$ with respect to the intersection pairing on $H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{Q}}})$.
 ---
bibliography:
- 'paper.bib'
---

\
\
\
\

> [*Several new methods have been recently proposed for performing valid inference after model selection. An older method is sampling splitting: use part of the data for model selection and the rest for inference. In this paper we revisit sample splitting combined with the bootstrap (or the Normal approximation). We show that this leads to a simple, assumption-free approach to inference and we establish results on the accuracy of the method. In fact, we find new bounds on the accuracy of the bootstrap and the Normal approximation for
the standard perfect - obstruction theory on the moduli quad. The decrease by this quotient defines the reduced virtual course, see [ @KT ] for a advanced treatment of this process. 

 [ ^6 ]: We cultivate here with an elliptically fibered K3 surface to obtain a consistent presentation of our results. By contortion invariance, our results incriminate parallel statement for any non - singular projective K3 surface with primitive curve class $ \beta$. 

 [ ^7 ]: We keep up the convention of Section   \[Section: Relative\_Gromov\_Witten\_theory\_of\_P1K3\ ] or equivalently of [ @MP ]. 

 [ ^8 ]: This is parallel to the breaking of the reduced virtual course in the K3 case when degenerating to two intellectual elliptic airfoil, see [ @MPT department 4 ]. 

 [ ^9 ]: If the curve is disconnected it must have precisely two part of degree $ 1 $ over $ { \mathbb{P}}^1 $ each. Moreover, one component carries the insertion $ { { \mathsf{p}}}\otimes \omega$ and contribute $ 1 $, the other carries all the insertions $ F \boxtimes \omega$ and contributes $ \Delta(q)^{-1}$. 

 [ ^10 ]: See Property (b). 

 [ ^11 ]: We may also use Proposition   \[Proposition\_take\_out\_div\ ] below to reduce to Proposition   \[vanishing1\ ]. 

 [ ^12 ]: For model, see [ @EZ page 105 ] for the crucial coefficient tie down. 

 [ ^13 ]: If $ \eta = \ { (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i }) \}$, then $ \eta^{\vee } = \ { (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}^{\vee }) \}$ where $ \ { \gamma_i^{\vee } \}$ is the footing double to $ \ { \gamma_i \}$ with respect to the intersection match on $ H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{Q}}})$. 
  --- 
 bibliography: 
 -' paper.bib' 
 --- 

 \ 
 \ 
 \ 
 \ 

 > [ * respective new methods have been recently proposed for perform valid inference after model selection. An older method is sampling splitting: use part of the data for model selection and the rest for inference. In this newspaper we revisit sample splitting combine with the bootstrap (or the Normal approximation). We show that this leads to a simple, assumption - spare approach to inference and we establish results on the accuracy of the method acting. In fact, we find raw bounds on the accuracy of the bootstrap and the Normal approximation for
 thf standard perfect-obstrugtion theory on jhw moduni spade. The rdduction by this quotient dehinew the reduced virtual class, see [@KT] flr a modwrn ureatment of this process.

[^6]: We wodn hexe with an ellipjically fibesed K3 surface do oytain a uniform presentation of our wesults. Bj deformation ynvagiwnce, our results imply parallel statemsnts fog any non-singular projective K3 surface with prilitive curve class $\beta$.

[^7]: We foolow rhe conventiun of Sectpmn \[Section:Rglative\_Gromov\_Witten\_theory\_of\_P1K3\] or equiralently of [@MP].

[^8]: Tjhs is paraloel tj the breakikb of tve reduved virtual clsss in the K3 case when degeierating to two ratijnal elli[tnc surfaces, see [@MPT Swcrion 4].

[^9]: If dhe zyrvd ia visdonneched it must hzve preciseoy two components og qvbree $1$ over ${\mzthbb{P}}^1$ ewch. Moreover, one component carries the pnsedtion ${{\mathsf{p}}}\otimes \ometa$ and contributes $1$, tje other sarries all the insertions $F \boxtimes \omega$ and cmntriuuges $\Dclta(d)^{-1}$.

[^10]: Sfe Property (b).

[^11]: We may also use Proposition \[Propjaiuiok\_take\_out\_div\] beloc to reduce to Ptoooxytion \[vanishine1\].

[^12]: For zsajple, see [@EZ page 105] vor the crucual coeffyciemt bound.

[^13]: If $\eta = \{ (\eta_i, \gammq_{s_i}) \}$, then $\etc^{\vew} = \{ (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}^{\vez}) \}$ where $\{ \gaoma_i^{\fee} \}$ os the basis dual to $\{ \gcmma_i \}$ with respeft to the kntersection paifinn ot $H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{Q}}})$.
 ---
bibliographr:
- 'paper.biu'
---

\
\
\
\

> [*Sevzral new metnods hwve been rfcently proposed for pervormiug vanid inferejce after model selection. An olvxr method is xakplpng splitcing: uxe part of thq data for modgl selectnon ana the rest for inherence. In tris paper we sgvisit sample splittigg cimbibed witf the bootstrap (or the Normal appriximation). We show bhat jhjs leads to a snoklw, assumption-frre xppwowci to ytference and we dstxnlish results on ghe sccuracy of the methmd. Ih fact, we find new bjunds on the acctracy of the nootstrap and the Jorman a'proxikatyon for
the standard perfect-obstruction theory on the moduli reduction this quotient the reduced virtual modern of this process. We work here an elliptically fibered K3 surface to a uniform presentation of our results. By deformation invariance, our results imply parallel for any non-singular projective K3 surface with primitive curve class $\beta$. [^7]: We the of \[Section:Relative\_Gromov\_Witten\_theory\_of\_P1K3\] equivalently of [@MP]. [^8]: This is parallel to the breaking of the reduced virtual class in K3 case when degenerating to two rational elliptic see [@MPT Section 4]. If the curve is disconnected must precisely two of $1$ ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ each. Moreover, component carries the insertion ${{\mathsf{p}}}\otimes \omega$ and contributes $1$, the other carries all the insertions $F \boxtimes and contributes See Property [^11]: may use Proposition \[Proposition\_take\_out\_div\] reduce to Proposition \[vanishing1\]. [^12]: For page 105] for the crucial coefficient bound. [^13]: $\eta = (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}) \}$, then $\eta^{\vee} = (\eta_i, \gamma_{s_i}^{\vee}) \}$ where $\{ \gamma_i^{\vee} \}$ is basis dual to $\{ \gamma_i \}$ with respect to the intersection pairing on $H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{Q}}})$. --- 'paper.bib' --- \ \ \ > [*Several methods been proposed performing valid after model selection. An older method is sampling splitting: use part the data for model selection and the rest for inference. paper revisit sample splitting with the bootstrap (or Normal We show that this a assumption-free and establish on the accuracy of method. In fact, we find bounds on the accuracy Normal approximation for
 the standard perfect-obstrucTion theory On the ModUli SpAce. THe reDuction by this qUOtieNt defines the reduced virTual cLaSS, see [@kt] fOr a moDern treATmENT of ThIs ProCeSS.

[^6]: WE work HerE with an EllipticalLy fIbEred K3 surface TO oBtain a unifOrm Presentation Of oUr resuLtS. By DEformAtiOn invAriancE, Our resUlts imply PaRAllel sTAtementS FOr Any nOn-singular projectIVe k3 Surface with priMitive CuRVe CLAss $\BetA$.

[^7]: We follow tHe ConveNTion of SECtION \[secTIon:Relative\_GrOmov\_Witten\_tHEorY\_of\_P1K3\] oR eQuiVAlentlY of [@MP].

[^8]: thIS is Parallel to tHe brEaking of tHe reduCEd virtuAL class iN the K3 cAse WheN degENeRaTinG tO Two RAtIonAL elLiptic suRfAcEs, see [@mPT SECTIOn 4].

[^9]: If The CurvE is diSconnected it mUst Have PRecIsely Two coMponEnTs of dEgree $1$ oVer ${\maThBb{P}}^1$ each. Moreover, One cOmponent cArrIeS thE iNsertIOn ${{\mathSf{p}}}\OtiMes \omegA$ and conTRibUtES $1$, THe Other carries all the InSERtIons $F \boxTimes \oMEgA$ aND contribUtEs $\DElta(Q)^{-1}$.

[^10]: sEe ProPertY (B).

[^11]: WE may also Use ProPOsItIon \[PropOsItion\_tAkE\_ouT\_diV\] beloW To reDuce to propositIon \[vaNIshing1\].

[^12]: For exampLE, see [@EZ page 105] for THe CRUcIAl coEffIcient bound.

[^13]: if $\etA = \{ (\Eta_i, \GammA_{S_i}) \}$, TheN $\Eta^{\veE} = \{ (\eta_i, \GaMMa_{S_I}^{\vee}) \}$ where $\{ \gamma_i^{\vee} \}$ iS tHe basiS dual To $\{ \gamma_i \}$ with rEspect to thE INTersectiOn paIRiNG on $H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{q}}})$.
 ---
biblIography:
- 'paPEr.bib'
---

\
\
\
\

> [*SevEral nEw methodS have been RECently prOpoSed For PerFORmIng valid inferENCe afTeR model sEleCtion. An OldEr mEthOd iS sAmpling spLitting: uSe PaRt Of The Data fOR model seLeCtiOn And The reST for inFerenCe. In ThIs PApeR we reviSIt SAMple SpLiTtinG coMbIned wIth tHE boOtstrap (Or the NormAl aPProxImAtIon). We shOw that this leaDs To a simple, aSsUmpTion-frEE Approach To inference and we establiSH resultS on The acCuraCy of the meThoD. In facT, we FInd new Bounds On the AcCurACY of thE BOoTstRaP and the NorMAL apProxiMaTion For
 the standard perfect-obst ruction th eoryonthe  m odul i sp ace. The reduc t ionby this quotient defin es th er educ e dvirtu al clas s ,s e e [ @K T]  fo ra  m odern  tr eatment  of this p roc es s.

[^6]: We wo rk here wi than elliptica lly  fiber ed  K3 surfa ceto ob tain a unifor m present at i on ofo ur resu l t s.  Bydeformation invar i an c e, our results  imply  p a ra l l elsta tements fo rany n o n-singu l ar p r oje c tive K3 surfa ce with pri m iti ve cur ve  cl a ss $\b eta$. 
[ ^7] : We follow  the  conventi on ofS ection\ [Sectio n:Rela tiv e\_ Grom o v\ _W itt en \ _th e or y\_ o f\_ P1K3\] o req uival entl y o f  [@M P]. 

[^ 8]: T his is parall elto t h e b reaki ng of  the  r educe d virt ual c la ss in the K3 ca se w hen degen era ti ngto  twor ationa l e lli ptic su rfaces, see  [ @ M P TSection 4].

[^9]:  I f th e curveis dis c on ne c ted it m us t h avep r ecise ly t w ocomponen ts ofd eg re e $1$ o ve r ${\m at hbb {P} }^1$e ach.  Moreo ver, one  comp o nent carries t h e insertion $ { {\ m a th s f{p} }}\ otimes \ome ga$a nd c ontr i bu tes $1$,the o th e rc arries all the inse rt ions $ F \bo xtimes \omega $ and cont r i b utes $\D elta ( q) ^ {-1}$.

[^10]:  SeeProperty ( b ).

[^11 ]: We  may als o use Pro p o sition \ [Pr opo sit ion \ _ ta ke\_out\_div\ ] belo wto redu ceto Prop osi tio n \ [va ni shing1\]. 

[^12]:  F or  e xa mpl e, se e  [@EZ pa ge  10 5]  fo r the crucia l coe ffic ie nt bou nd.

[^ 1 3] : If $ \e ta  = \ { ( \e ta_i,  \ga m ma_ {s_i})\}$, then  $\ e ta^{ \v ee } = \{(\eta_i, \gam ma _{s_i}^{\v ee })\}$ wh e r e $\{ \g amma_i^{\vee} \}$ is th e  basisdua l to$\{\gamma_i\}$  withres p ect to  the i nters ec tio n pairi n g  o n $ H^ {\ast}(S,{ { \ mat hbb{Q }} })$. 
 ---
b ibliography:
- 'pa p er. bib'
---

\
\ 
\\

> [ *S eve r al new  m e tho d s  have been rece ntly propo se d  f or perform i ngva lid inf erenceafter model s election.  An older  m etho d issampling s plitting : use par t  of t h edatafor  model  s ele ction  and t h e r est f or inf er ence.In th is  paper w e revisit sample splitt ing co mbine d w ith the b oot s tra p (or the  Nor mal approx ima tio n). W e s h ow th at t h is  le a ds to  a s i mple, ass u mp tio n - fr ee approach t o  in feren cea nd weesta blish results ont he accuracy of  the m eth od. In f ac t, we find new  bo un d s  on theac curacy of t he boots tr a p and  the N ormalapproxi m a ti o n for
 the_standard perfect-obstruction_theory on the moduli_space. The_reduction_by this_quotient_defines the reduced_virtual class, see_[@KT] for a modern_treatment of this_process.

[^6]:_We work here with an elliptically fibered K3 surface to obtain a uniform presentation_of_our results._By_deformation_invariance, our results imply parallel_statements for any non-singular projective_K3 surface_with primitive curve class $\beta$.

[^7]: We follow the_convention_of Section \[Section:Relative\_Gromov\_Witten\_theory\_of\_P1K3\] or_equivalently of [@MP].

[^8]: This is parallel to the breaking_of the reduced virtual class in_the K3 case_when_degenerating_to two rational elliptic_surfaces, see [@MPT Section 4].

[^9]: If_the curve is disconnected it must_have precisely two components of degree $1$_over ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ each. Moreover, one component_carries the insertion ${{\mathsf{p}}}\otimes \omega$_and contributes_$1$, the other carries all_the insertions $F_\boxtimes \omega$_and contributes $\Delta(q)^{-1}$.

[^10]:_See Property (b).

[^11]: We may also_use Proposition \[Proposition\_take\_out\_div\] below_to reduce to Proposition \[vanishing1\].

[^12]: For example,_see_[@EZ page 105]_for_the_crucial coefficient_bound.

[^13]: If $\eta_=_\{ (\eta_i,_\gamma_{s_i})_\}$, then $\eta^{\vee} = \{ (\eta_i,_\gamma_{s_i}^{\vee})_\}$ where $\{ \gamma_i^{\vee} \}$ is the_basis dual to $\{_\gamma_i_\}$ with respect to_the intersection pairing on $H^{\ast}(S,{{\mathbb{Q}}})$.
_---
bibliography:
- 'paper.bib'
---

\
\
\
\

> [*Several new methods have_been recently_proposed for_performing valid inference after model selection. An older method is sampling_splitting: use part of the data_for model selection and_the rest_for_inference. In this_paper_we revisit_sample splitting combined with the bootstrap (or_the Normal_approximation). We show that this leads_to a simple, assumption-free_approach_to inference and we establish results_on the accuracy of the method._In fact, we find new_bounds_on_the accuracy of the bootstrap_and the Normal approximation for