 {\mathbb{S}}$. By definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\] of step space, there exist locus $\lambda \in \Lambda$, frame ${\mathbf{f}} = (\psi, \phi) \in {\prod{\Psi}} \times {\prod{\Phi}}$, and functionality ${\mathit{f}} \in {\mathscr{F}}$ such that ${\mathit{s}} = (\lambda, {\mathit{f}}, (\psi, \phi))$. Definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\] establishes that $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$.

By Theorem \[T:AUTOMATON\_OPERATOR\] the automaton induces an iterative operator, so there exists ${\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}) = (\lambda', {\mathit{f}}',(\psi', \phi')) \in {\mathbb{S}}$. Again by definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\], $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}})) = (\psi', \phi')$.

Definition \[D:ITERATIVE\_TRANSFORM\] evaluates ${\mathbf{f}}\,' = (\psi', \phi') = (\phi\xi, {\mathit{f}}'(\phi\xi))$ as the succeeding frame. Definition \[D:CONJOINT\] asserts that frame $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins frame $(\psi', \phi')$ if ${{\psi'}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \phi$. Here $\psi' = \phi\xi$, so ${{\phi\xi}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \phi$ by virtue of persistent-volatile partition $\Psi = \Phi\Xi$. Thus we conclude $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $(\psi', \phi')$.

Since $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$, $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $(\psi', \phi')$, and $(\psi', \phi') = \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}))$, then by transitivity $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}})$ conjoins $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}))$.


{ \mathbb{S}}$. By definition \[D: STEP\_SPACE\ ] of step space, there exist locus $ \lambda \in \Lambda$, frame $ { \mathbf{f } } = (\psi, \phi) \in { \prod{\Psi } } \times { \prod{\Phi}}$, and functionality $ { \mathit{f } } \in { \mathscr{F}}$ such that $ { \mathit{s } } = (\lambda, { \mathit{f } }, (\psi, \phi))$. Definition \[D: STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\ ] prove that $ \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s } }) = (\psi, \phi)$. 

 By Theorem \[T: AUTOMATON\_OPERATOR\ ] the automaton induce an iterative operator, so there exists $ { \mathfrak{A}}_\xi ({ \mathit{s } }) = (\lambda', { \mathit{f}}',(\psi', \phi') ) \in { \mathbb{S}}$. Again by definition \[D: STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\ ], $ \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi ({ \mathit{s } }) ) = (\psi', \phi')$. 

 Definition \[D: ITERATIVE\_TRANSFORM\ ] evaluates $ { \mathbf{f}}\,' = (\psi', \phi') = (\phi\xi, { \mathit{f}}'(\phi\xi))$ as the succeed frame. Definition \[D: CONJOINT\ ] asserts that skeletal system $ (\psi, \phi)$ conjoins frame $ (\psi', \phi')$ if $ { { \psi'}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi } } } } } = \phi$. Here $ \psi' = \phi\xi$, indeed $ { { \phi\xi}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi } } } } } = \phi$ by virtue of haunting - volatile partition $ \Psi = \Phi\Xi$. therefore we conclude $ (\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $ (\psi', \phi')$. 

 Since $ \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s } }) = (\psi, \phi)$, $ (\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $ (\psi', \phi')$, and $ (\psi', \phi') = \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi ({ \mathit{s}}))$, then by transitivity $ \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}})$ conjoins $ \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi ({ \mathit{s}}))$.
 {\mahhbb{S}}$. By definition \[D:STEK\_SPACE\] of step spcxe, thece exisf locus $\uambda \in \Lambda$, frame ${\mathbh{f}} = (\psi, \pyi) \in {\prod{\Psi}} \times {\prud{\Phi}}$, and functiobaliuy ${\mathit{f}} \in {\matiacr{F}}$ sugk thaf ${\matkiv{s}} = (\lambda, {\mathlt{f}}, (\psi, \phi))$. Definition \[D:SDEO\_S'ACE\_PROJECTION\] establishes that $\mho_{\mwthbf{F}}({\mstjit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$.

Bi Thepwem \[F:AUTOMATON\_OPERATOR\] the automaton ihduces en iterative oprrator, so there exists ${\matjfran{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}) = (\lambfa', {\mathit{f}}',(\pwi', \pru')) \in {\mathbb{S}}$. Again by definition \[D:ATEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\], $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mxthfrck{A}}_\xi( {\mathij{s}})) = (\ovi', \phi')$.

Definmtion \[Q:ITERATIVE\_TRANSFORM\] avaluatrs ${\mathbf{f}}\,' = (\psl', \phi') = (\pyi\xi, {\mathit{f}}'(\phi\xi))$ as vhe succeeding frame. Definitimn \[D:CONJOINT\] assertw rhat xrama $(\psk, \phk)$ cknooihs frale $(\'si', \phi')$ if ${{\lsi'}\negmedspqce\mid\negmedspace{{{\optraeirname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \phi$. Hqrq $\psi' = \phi\xi$, so ${{\phi\xi}\negmedspace\mid\negmtdspade{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \pyi$ by virtue of persidtent-volaeile partition $\Psi = \Phi\Xi$. Thus we conclude $(\psi, \phh)$ conookns $(\pfk', \pji')$.

Since $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$, $(\psi, \phi)$ cognoonx $(\psi', \phi')$, and $(\isi', \phi') = \mho_{\mathbf{G}}({\mwtnsrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathij{s}}))$, then by transitivity $\mho_{\mwthbf{F}}({\mwthit{w}})$ conjoinf $\mhp_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}))$.


{\mathbb{S}}$. By definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\] of step space, locus \in \Lambda$, ${\mathbf{f}} = (\psi, and ${\mathit{f}} \in {\mathscr{F}}$ that ${\mathit{s}} = {\mathit{f}}, (\psi, \phi))$. Definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\] establishes $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$. By Theorem \[T:AUTOMATON\_OPERATOR\] the automaton induces an iterative operator, there exists ${\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}) = (\lambda', {\mathit{f}}',(\psi', \phi')) \in {\mathbb{S}}$. Again by definition $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( = \phi')$. \[D:ITERATIVE\_TRANSFORM\] evaluates ${\mathbf{f}}\,' = (\psi', \phi') = (\phi\xi, {\mathit{f}}'(\phi\xi))$ as the succeeding frame. Definition \[D:CONJOINT\] asserts frame $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins frame $(\psi', \phi')$ if = \phi$. Here $\psi' \phi\xi$, so ${{\phi\xi}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \phi$ virtue persistent-volatile partition = Thus conclude $(\psi, \phi)$ $(\psi', \phi')$. Since $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) = (\psi, \phi)$, $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $(\psi', \phi')$, and $(\psi', \phi') = \mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( then by conjoins $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi(
 {\mathbb{S}}$. By definition \[D:STEP\_SpACE\] of step Space, TheRe eXiSt loCus $\lAmbda \in \Lambda$, fRAme ${\mAthbf{f}} = (\psi, \phi) \in {\prod{\Psi}} \tImes {\pRoD{\phi}}$, aND fUnctiOnality ${\MAtHIT{f}} \iN {\mAtHscR{F}}$ SUcH that ${\MatHit{s}} = (\lamBda, {\mathit{f}}, (\Psi, \PhI))$. Definition \[D:stEp\_SPACE\_PROJeCTiON\] establishEs tHat $\mho_{\MaThbF{f}}({\mathIt{s}}) = (\Psi, \phI)$.

By TheORem \[T:AUtOMATON\_OPeRatOR\] the AUtomatoN INdUces An iterative operatOR, sO There exists ${\matHfrak{A}}_\Xi( {\MAtHIT{s}}) = (\lAmbDa', {\mathit{f}}',(\pSi', \Phi')) \in {\MAthbb{S}}$. AGAiN BY DefINition \[D:STEP\_SPaCE\_PROJECTIon\], $\mhO_{\mathbF{F}}({\MatHFrak{A}}_\xI( {\mathIt{S}})) = (\Psi', \Phi')$.

DefinitiOn \[D:ItERATIVE\_TrANSFOrm\] evaluaTEs ${\mathbF{f}}\,' = (\psi', \pHi') = (\pHi\xI, {\matHIt{F}}'(\pHi\xI))$ aS The SUcCeeDIng Frame. DefInItIon \[D:CoNJOint\] ASserTs tHat fRame $(\pSi, \phi)$ conjoins FraMe $(\psI', \Phi')$ If ${{\psi'}\NegmeDspaCe\Mid\neGmedspAce{{{\opErAtorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \pHi$. HeRe $\psi' = \phi\xI$, so ${{\PhI\xi}\NeGmedsPAce\mid\NegMedSpace{{{\opEratornAMe{dOm}{\pHI}}}}} = \PhI$ by virtue of persistEnT-VOlAtile parTition $\pSi = \phI\xi$. Thus we CoNclUde $(\pSI, \Phi)$ coNjoiNS $(\pSi', \phi')$.

SinCe $\mho_{\mAThBf{f}}({\mathit{S}}) = (\pSi, \phi)$, $(\pSi, \Phi)$ ConJoins $(\PSi', \phI')$, and $(\psI', \phi') = \mho_{\mAthbf{f}}({\Mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\matHIt{s}}))$, then by tranSItIVItY $\Mho_{\mAthBf{F}}({\mathit{s}})$ cOnjoINs $\mhO_{\matHBf{f}}({\maTHfrak{a}}_\xi( {\maThIT{s}}))$.


 {\mathbb{S}}$. By definit ion \[D:ST EP\_S PAC E\]  o f st ep s pace, there ex i st l ocus $\lambda \in \Lam bda$,  f r ame$ {\ mathb f{f}} = (\ p s i,\p hi ) \ in {\ prod{ \Ps i}} \ti mes {\prod {\P hi }}$, and fun c ti onality ${ \ma thit{f}} \in  {\ mathsc r{ F}} $  such  th at ${ \mathi t {s}} =  (\lambda ,{ \mathi t {f}}, ( \ p si , \p hi))$. Definition \[ D :STEP\_SPACE\_ PROJEC TI O N\ ] est abl ishes that  $ \mho_ { \mathbf { F} } ( { \ma t hit{s}}) = (\ psi, \phi)$ . 

B y Theo re m \ [ T:AUTO MATON \_ O PER ATOR\] theauto maton ind uces a n  iterat i ve oper ator,sothe re e x is ts  ${ \m a thf r ak {A} } _\x i( {\mat hi t{ s}})= (\ l a m b da',  {\ math it{f} }',(\psi', \p hi' )) \ i n { \math bb{S} }$.Ag ain b y defi nitio n\[D:STEP\_SPACE \_PR OJECTION\ ],$\ mho _{ \math b f{F}}( {\m ath frak{A} }_\xi({ \ma th i t { s} })) = (\psi', \phi ') $ . 
Definiti on \[D : IT ER A TIVE\_TR AN SFO RM\] e valua tes$ {\ mathbf{f }}\,'=  ( \p si', \p hi ') = ( \p hi\ xi,  {\ma t hit{ f}}'(\ phi\xi)) $ ast he succeedingf rame. Definit i on \ [D : CONJ OIN T\] asserts  tha t  fra me $ ( \p si, \phi) $ con jo i ns frame $(\psi', \phi ') $ if $ {{\ps i'}\negmedspa ce\mid\neg m e d space{{{ \ope r at o rname{dom}{\Ph i}}}} } = \phi$. Here $\p si' =  \phi\xi $, so ${{ \ p hi\xi}\n egm eds pac e\m i d \n egmedspace{{{ \ o pera to rname{d om} {\Phi}} }}}  =\ph i$by  virtue o f persis te nt -v ol ati le pa r tition $ \P si=\Ph i\Xi$ .  Thuswe co nclu de  $ ( \ps i, \phi ) $c o njoi ns  $ (\ps i',  \ phi') $.
S inc e $\mho _{\mathbf {F} } ({\m at hi t{s}})= (\psi, \phi )$ , $(\psi,\p hi) $ conj o i ns $(\ps i', \phi')$, and $(\psi ' , \phi' ) =  \mho _{\m athbf{F}} ({\ mathfr ak{ A }}_\xi ( {\ma thit{ s} })) $ ,  then b ytra ns itivity $\ m h o_{ \math bf {F}} ({\math it{s}})$ conjoins$ \mh o_{\mathbf{F} }({ \mat h f ra k{A } }_ \ xi(  { \ mat h i t{s}}))$.


 {\mathbb{S}}$._By definition_\[D:STEP\_SPACE\] of step space,_there exist_locus_$\lambda \in_\Lambda$,_frame ${\mathbf{f}} =_(\psi, \phi) \in_{\prod{\Psi}} \times {\prod{\Phi}}$, and_functionality ${\mathit{f}} \in_{\mathscr{F}}$_such that ${\mathit{s}} = (\lambda, {\mathit{f}}, (\psi, \phi))$. Definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\] establishes that $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}}) =_(\psi,_\phi)$.

By Theorem_\[T:AUTOMATON\_OPERATOR\]_the_automaton induces an iterative operator,_so there exists ${\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}})_= (\lambda',_{\mathit{f}}',(\psi', \phi')) \in {\mathbb{S}}$. Again by definition \[D:STEP\_SPACE\_PROJECTION\],_$\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi(_{\mathit{s}})) = (\psi',_\phi')$.

Definition \[D:ITERATIVE\_TRANSFORM\] evaluates ${\mathbf{f}}\,' = (\psi', \phi') = (\phi\xi,_{\mathit{f}}'(\phi\xi))$ as the succeeding frame. Definition_\[D:CONJOINT\] asserts that_frame_$(\psi,_\phi)$ conjoins frame $(\psi',_\phi')$ if ${{\psi'}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} = \phi$. Here_$\psi' = \phi\xi$, so ${{\phi\xi}\negmedspace\mid\negmedspace{{{\operatorname{dom}{\Phi}}}}} =_\phi$ by virtue of persistent-volatile partition $\Psi_= \Phi\Xi$. Thus we conclude $(\psi,_\phi)$ conjoins $(\psi', \phi')$.

Since $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}})_= (\psi,_\phi)$, $(\psi, \phi)$ conjoins $(\psi',_\phi')$, and $(\psi',_\phi') =_\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}))$, then_by transitivity $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathit{s}})$ conjoins $\mho_{\mathbf{F}}({\mathfrak{A}}_\xi( {\mathit{s}}))$.

