 provide a correct description of $S(k)$ and $g(r)$ at these parameters, showing unphysical effects of attraction between ions. However, from Fig. \[fig:rs2Sk\] it is also evident that the STLS results and the QMC data based results at $ka>4$ (out of the region of the unphysical minimum) are in good agreement with each other. This is because the STLS potential correctly reproduces the QMC data based potential at $r/a<1$ (see Fig. \[fig:potrs2\]). In this way, the detailed examination employing the QMC static local field correction allowed us to find the reason for the failure of the STLS screened potential, at certain plasma parameters, in description of the structural properties of the strongly coupled ions in a dense quantum plasma.

Density $1<r_s<2$: moderately non-ideal electrons
-------------------------------------------------

Considering densities corresponding to $1<r_s<2$ we can reveal more information about the applicability of the STLS screened potential for the calculation of $g(r)$ and $S(k)$, at $\Gamma>1$. The STLS and RPA potentials are shown in Fig. \[fig:potrs15rs18\], for $r_s=1.5$ and $1.8$, at $\theta=0.01$. Again, the STLS potential is more strongly screened than the RPA potential. Additionally, at $r/a>1$, the STLS potential has a negative minimum at both densities, $r_s=1.5$ and $r_s=1.8$, but with different overall behavior after the minimum. At $r_s=1.5$, the STLS potential has an oscillatory pattern with alternating positive and negative extrema and, at $r_s=1.8$, a well developed region of attraction is clearly seen. This difference leads to dramatic consequences in the structural properties [@Matsuda; @Canales].

In Fig. \[fig:gr\_rs18rs15\], the RPDF of ions at $r_s=1.5$ and $r_s=1.8$ is shown for $\theta=0.01$ and $\Gamma=50$. At $r_s=1.5$, due to stronger screening, the RPDF calculated using the STLS potential has a smaller correlation-hole and a lower
provide a correct description of $ S(k)$ and $ g(r)$ at these parameters, showing unphysical effect of drawing card between ions. However, from Fig.   \[fig: rs2Sk\ ] it is also apparent that the STLS solution and the QMC data based resultant role at $ ka>4 $ (out of the area of the unphysical minimum) are in good agreement with each other. This is because the STLS potential correctly reproduces the QMC data free-base potential at $ r / a<1 $ (determine Fig.   \[fig: potrs2\ ]). In this way, the detailed examination employing the QMC static local field discipline allowed us to find the reason for the bankruptcy of the STLS screened potential, at certain plasma parameters, in description of the structural property of the strongly coupled ions in a dense quantum plasma. 

 Density $ 1 < r_s<2 $: moderately non - ideal electrons 
 ------------------------------------------------- 

 study densities corresponding to $ 1 < r_s<2 $ we can reveal more information about the applicability of the STLS screened electric potential for the calculation of $ g(r)$ and $ S(k)$, at $ \Gamma>1$. The STLS and RPA potential are shown in Fig.   \[fig: potrs15rs18\ ], for $ r_s=1.5 $ and $ 1.8 $, at $ \theta=0.01$. Again, the STLS potential is more strongly screened than the RPA potential. Additionally, at $ r / a>1 $, the STLS potential has a negative minimum at both density, $ r_s=1.5 $ and $ r_s=1.8 $, but with different overall behavior after the minimum. At $ r_s=1.5 $, the STLS electric potential have an oscillatory design with alternating positive and negative extrema and, at $ r_s=1.8 $, a well developed region of attraction is intelligibly seen. This difference leads to dramatic consequences in the structural properties [ @Matsuda; @Canales ]. 

 In Fig.   \[fig: gr\_rs18rs15\ ], the RPDF of ion at $ r_s=1.5 $ and $ r_s=1.8 $ is shown for $ \theta=0.01 $ and $ \Gamma=50$. At $ r_s=1.5 $, due to stronger screening, the RPDF calculated using the STLS potential has a little correlation coefficient - hole and a lower
 prlvide a correct descriptlon of $S(k)$ and $g(r)$ at theve parzmeters, rhowing unphysical effects oh atrractuon between ions. Howevdr, from Fpg. \[fig:rs2Sk\] it ms also evident vgat the STLS dcsultv and the QMC dsta based sesults at $ka>4$ (mug lf the region of the unphysical minymum) arr ln good agreemgnt wptr eadh other. This is because the STLS lotentiel correctly relroduces the QMC data basef pohential at $r/a<1$ (see Vig. \[fig:potrs2\]). In eyis way, the aetailed eqcmination ejploying the QMC static local fkeld eorrection qloowfg us to finv the geason for thc failuse of tne STLS screencd poventual, at certain plasma parameters, in dessription mf the structural peopertigs of the wtrungmy ckupled iois in a denae quantum plasma.

Density $1<r_s<2$: mocewqtely non-ideam elecerjns
-------------------------------------------------

Considering densities corresponding uo $1<r_s<2$ we can reveal more infirmation about the apklicabilitr of the STLS screened potential for the calculathon oh $e(r)$ ckq $W(k)$, at $\Gamma>1$. The STLS and RPA potentials are shorh on Fig. \[fig:potrs15rs18\], for $r_s=1.5$ and $1.8$, wt $\jheta=0.01$. Again, thg STLS 'ktsntial is more strlngly ssreenwd than tre RLA potential. Additionally, ar $r/a>1$, the STLF potential has a nzgative minioum st boyh densities, $r_s=1.5$ and $r_s=1.8$, yut wifh differenh overall cehavior after tfe kitimum. At $r_s=1.5$, the STLS poteneial has en oseillatorh pajtern wyth alternwting positive and negatlve ertremd and, at $r_d=1.8$, a well developed region of atvcaction is clgarny veen. Thif difnerence leads tj dramatic conxequenczs in ghe structlral propxrties [@Matsuqa; @Canales].

In Xlg. \[fig:gr\_rs18rs15\], vhe RPDF jf iins qt $r_s=1.5$ ava $r_s=1.8$ is shown gor $\theta=0.01$ and $\Gamma=50$. At $r_s=1.5$, due to strokger rdreening, the RPBY xalculated usinb tfe FTPS pjdential has d smxlldt corfelation-holc avd a lower
provide a correct description of $S(k)$ and these showing unphysical of attraction between it also evident that STLS results and QMC data based results at $ka>4$ of the region of the unphysical minimum) are in good agreement with each This is because the STLS potential correctly reproduces the QMC data based potential $r/a<1$ Fig. In way, the detailed examination employing the QMC static local field correction allowed us to find the for the failure of the STLS screened potential, certain plasma parameters, in of the structural properties of strongly ions in dense plasma. $1<r_s<2$: moderately non-ideal ------------------------------------------------- Considering densities corresponding to $1<r_s<2$ we can reveal more information about the applicability of the STLS potential for of $g(r)$ $S(k)$, $\Gamma>1$. STLS and RPA shown in Fig. \[fig:potrs15rs18\], for $r_s=1.5$ $\theta=0.01$. Again, the STLS potential is more strongly than the potential. Additionally, at $r/a>1$, the STLS has a negative minimum at both densities, $r_s=1.5$ $r_s=1.8$, but with different overall behavior after the minimum. At $r_s=1.5$, the STLS potential has pattern with alternating positive negative extrema and, $r_s=1.8$, well region attraction is seen. This difference leads to dramatic consequences in the structural properties @Canales]. In Fig. \[fig:gr\_rs18rs15\], the RPDF of ions at $r_s=1.5$ is for $\theta=0.01$ and At $r_s=1.5$, due to screening, RPDF calculated using the has smaller lower
 provide a correct descriptioN of $S(k)$ and $g(r)$ At theSe pAraMeTers, ShowIng unphysical eFFectS of attraction between ioNs. HowEvER, froM fiG. \[fig:rS2Sk\] it is ALsO EVidEnT tHat ThE sTlS resUltS and the qMC data basEd rEsUlts at $ka>4$ (out oF ThE region of tHe uNphysical minImuM) are in GoOd aGReemeNt wIth eaCh otheR. this is Because thE StlS poteNTial corRECtLy reProduces the QMC datA BaSEd potential at $r/A<1$ (see FiG. \[fIG:pOTRs2\]). IN thIs way, the deTaIled eXAminatiON eMPLOyiNG the QMC static Local field cORreCtion aLlOweD Us to fiNd the ReASon For the failuRe of The STLS scReened POtentiaL, At certaIn plasMa pAraMeteRS, iN dEscRiPTioN Of The STruCtural prOpErTies oF the STRONgly CouPled Ions iN a dense quantuM plAsma.

dEnsIty $1<r_s<2$: ModerAtelY nOn-ideAl elecTrons
-------------------------------------------------

coNsidering densitIes cOrrespondIng To $1<R_s<2$ wE cAn revEAl more InfOrmAtion abOut the aPPliCaBILItY of the STLS screened PoTENtIal for thE calcuLAtIoN Of $g(r)$ and $S(K)$, aT $\GaMma>1$. THE sTLS aNd RPa PoTentials Are shoWN iN FIg. \[fig:poTrS15rs18\], for $R_s=1.5$ And $1.8$, At $\tHeta=0.01$. AGAin, tHe STLS PotentiaL is moRE strongly screeNEd than the RPA pOTeNTIaL. addiTioNally, at $r/a>1$, thE STLs PoteNtiaL HaS a nEGativE miniMuM At BOth densities, $r_s=1.5$ and $r_s=1.8$, BuT with dIfferEnt overall behAvior after THE Minimum. AT $r_s=1.5$, tHE StlS potential has An oscIllatory paTTern with AlterNating poSitive and NEGative exTreMa aNd, aT $r_s=1.8$, A WElL developed regION of aTtRaction Is cLearly sEen. thiS diFfeReNce leads tO dramatiC cOnSeQuEncEs in tHE structuRaL prOpErtIes [@MaTSuda; @CaNales].

in FiG. \[fIg:GR\_rs18Rs15\], the RPdf oF IOns aT $r_S=1.5$ aNd $r_s=1.8$ Is sHoWn for $\ThetA=0.01$ And $\gamma=50$. At $R_s=1.5$, due to stRonGEr scReEnIng, the RpDF calculated UsIng the STLS PoTenTial haS A Smaller cOrrelation-hole and a lower
 provide a correct descrip tion of $S (k)$and  $g (r )$ a t th ese parameters ,  sho wing unphysical effect s ofat t ract i on  betw een ion s .H o wev er ,fro mF ig . \[f ig: rs2Sk\]  it is als o e vi dent that th e  S TLS result s a nd the QMC d ata  based  r esu l ts at  $k a>4$(out o f  the r egion ofth e  unphy s ical mi n i mu m) a re in good agreem e nt with each othe r. Thi si sb e cau sethe STLS p ot entia l  correc t ly r e pro d uces the QMCdata basedp ote ntialat  $r / a<1$ ( see F ig .  \[ fig:potrs2\ ]).In this w ay, th e  detail e d exami nation  em plo ying th eQMC  s t ati c  l oca l  fi eld corr ec ti on al lowe d u s  tofin d th e rea son for the f ail ureo f t he ST LS sc reen ed  pote ntial,  at c er tain plasma par amet ers, in d esc ri pti on  of t h e stru ctu ral  proper ties of the  s t r o ng ly coupled ions in  a d en se quant um pla s ma .Density$1 <r_ s<2$ : moder atel y  n on-ideal  elect r on s------- -- ------ -- --- --- ----- - ---- ------ -------- --

C o nsidering dens i ties correspo n di n g  t o  $1< r_s <2$ we canreve a l mo re i n fo rma t ion a boutth e  a p plicability of theST LS scr eened  potential fo r the calc u l a tion of$g(r ) $a nd $S(k)$, at$\Gam ma>1$. The STLS and  RPApotentia ls are sh o w n in Fig . \ [fi g:p otr s 1 5r s18\], for $r _ s =1.5 $and $1. 8$,  at $\t het a=0 .01 $.Ag ain, theSTLS pot en ti al  i s m ore s t rongly s cr een ed  th an th e  RPA p otent ial.  A dd i tio nally,a t$ r /a>1 $,  t he S TLS  p otent ialh asa negat ive minim uma t bo th  d ensitie s, $r_s=1.5$an d $r_s=1.8 $,  bu t with d ifferent  overall behavior after the min imu m. At  $r_ s=1.5$, t heSTLS p ote n tial h as anoscil la tor y patte r n  w ith  a lternating p osi tivean d ne gativeextrema and, at $r _ s=1 .8$, a well d eve lope d re gio n  o f  at tr a cti o n  is clearly see n. This di ff e re nce leadst o d ra matic c onseque ncesi n the s tructural  properti es  [@M a t sud a; @Canale s].

InFig. \[fi g :gr\_ r s1 8rs15 \],  the R PD F o f ion s at $ r _s= 1.5$and $r _s =1.8$is sh ow n for $\ theta=0.01$ and $\Gamma =50$.At $r _s= 1.5$, due  to str onger scr eeni ng, the RP DFcal culat edu singtheS TL S p o tenti al h a s a small e rcor r e la tion-hole a n d a l ower
 provide_a correct_description of $S(k)$ and_$g(r)$ at_these_parameters, showing_unphysical_effects of attraction_between ions. However,_from Fig. \[fig:rs2Sk\] it is_also evident that_the_STLS results and the QMC data based results at $ka>4$ (out of the region_of_the unphysical_minimum)_are_in good agreement with each_other. This is because the_STLS potential_correctly reproduces the QMC data based potential at_$r/a<1$_(see Fig. \[fig:potrs2\]). In_this way, the detailed examination employing the QMC static_local field correction allowed us to_find the reason_for_the_failure of the STLS_screened potential, at certain plasma parameters,_in description of the structural properties_of the strongly coupled ions in a_dense quantum plasma.

Density $1<r_s<2$: moderately non-ideal_electrons
-------------------------------------------------

Considering densities corresponding to $1<r_s<2$_we can_reveal more information about the_applicability of the_STLS screened_potential for the_calculation of $g(r)$ and $S(k)$, at_$\Gamma>1$. The STLS_and RPA potentials are shown in_Fig. \[fig:potrs15rs18\],_for $r_s=1.5$ and_$1.8$,_at_$\theta=0.01$. Again,_the STLS potential_is_more strongly_screened_than the RPA potential. Additionally, at_$r/a>1$,_the STLS potential has a negative minimum_at both densities, $r_s=1.5$_and_$r_s=1.8$, but with different_overall behavior after the minimum._At $r_s=1.5$, the STLS potential has_an oscillatory_pattern with_alternating positive and negative extrema and, at $r_s=1.8$, a well developed_region of attraction is clearly seen._This difference leads to_dramatic consequences_in_the structural properties_[@Matsuda;_@Canales].

In Fig. \[fig:gr\_rs18rs15\],_the RPDF of ions at $r_s=1.5$ and_$r_s=1.8$ is_shown for $\theta=0.01$ and $\Gamma=50$. At_$r_s=1.5$, due to stronger_screening,_the RPDF calculated using the STLS_potential has a smaller correlation-hole and_a lower