ar[r] & 0 }.
\label{eq:two}$$ Then ${\mathcal{A}}''$ is Connes-amenable if and only if this short exact sequence splits.

This follows in the same manner as the above proof, using Theorem \[Connes\_Amen\].

Beurling algebras
=================

Let $S$ be a discrete semigroup (we can extend the following definitions to locally compact semigroups, but for the questions we are interested in, the results for non-discrete groups are trivial). A *weight* on $S$ is a function $\omega: S
\rightarrow \mathbb R^{>0}$ such that $$\omega(st)\leq \omega(s)\omega(t) \qquad (s,t\in S).$$ Furthermore, if $S$ is unital with unit $u_S$, then we also insist that $\omega(u_S)=1$. This last condition is simply a normalisation condition, as we can always set $\hat\omega(s)
= \sup\{ \omega(st) \omega(t)^{-1} : t\in S \}$ for each $s\in S$. For $s,t\in S$, we have that $\omega(st) \leq \hat\omega(s)\omega(t)$, so that $$\hat\omega(st) = \sup\{ \omega(str)\omega(r)^{-1} : r\in S \}
\leq \sup \{ \hat\omega(s)\omega(tr)\omega(r)^{-1} : r\in S \}
= \hat\omega(s) \hat\omega(t).$$ Clearly $\hat\omega(u_S)=1$ and $\hat\omega(s)\leq\omega(s)$ for each $s\in S$, while $\hat\omega(s) \geq \omega(s)\omega(u_S)^{-1}$, so that $\hat\omega$ is equivalent to $\omega$.

We form the Banach space $$l^1(S,\omega) = \Big\{ (a_g)_{g\in S} \subseteq\mathbb C :
\|(a_g)\| := \sum_{g\in S} |a_g| \omega(g) < \infty \Big\}.$$ Then $l^1(S,\omega)$, with the convolution product, is a Banach
ar[r ] & 0 }. 
 \label{eq: two}$$ Then $ { \mathcal{A}}''$ is Connes - amenable if and only if this short exact sequence split. 

 This take after in the same manner as the above proof, using Theorem   \[Connes\_Amen\ ]. 

 Beurling algebra 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Let $ S$ be a discrete semigroup (we can extend the following definition to locally compact semigroups, but for the questions we are concerned in, the result for non - discrete groups are superficial). A * weight * on $ S$ is a function $ \omega: S 
 \rightarrow \mathbb R^{>0}$ such that $ $ \omega(st)\leq \omega(s)\omega(t) \qquad (south, t\in S).$$ Furthermore, if $ S$ is unital with unit $ u_S$, then we also insist that $ \omega(u_S)=1$. This last condition is simply a standardization condition, as we can always set $ \hat\omega(s) 
 = \sup\ { \omega(st) \omega(t)^{-1 }: t\in sulfur \}$ for each $ s\in S$. For $ s, t\in S$, we have that $ \omega(st) \leq \hat\omega(s)\omega(t)$, so that $ $ \hat\omega(st) = \sup\ { \omega(str)\omega(r)^{-1 }: r\in S \ } 
 \leq \sup \ { \hat\omega(s)\omega(tr)\omega(r)^{-1 }: r\in S \ } 
 = \hat\omega(s) \hat\omega(t).$$ intelligibly $ \hat\omega(u_S)=1 $ and $ \hat\omega(s)\leq\omega(s)$ for each $ s\in S$, while $ \hat\omega(s) \geq \omega(s)\omega(u_S)^{-1}$, so that $ \hat\omega$ is equivalent to $ \omega$. 

 We form the Banach outer space $ $ l^1(S,\omega) = \Big\ { (a_g)_{g\in S } \subseteq\mathbb C: 
 \|(a_g)\|: = \sum_{g\in S } |a_g| \omega(g) < \infty \Big\}.$$ Then $ l^1(S,\omega)$, with the convolution product, is a Banach
ar[r] & 0 }.
\label{eq:two}$$ Then ${\mathcxl{A}}''$ is Connes-amgnqble ih and ohly if tfis short exact sequence splmts.

Tyis fillows in the same manver as thv above peoof, ysing Theocsm \[Connes\_Amen\].

Bsmrliny elgebras
=================

Let $S$ bg a discrete semigroup (we wav zxtend the following definitions to jocally clmpact semigroops, blt for nht questions we are interested in, fhe resllts for non-discrrte groups are trivial). A *wfighh* on $S$ is a functiln $\omega: S
\rughtwerow \mathbb F^{>0}$ such thau $$\mmega(st)\leq \omega(s)\omega(t) \qquad (s,t\in S).$$ Furtfermoxe, if $S$ is ouutap with unit $n_S$, theg we also insist thad $\omega(i_S)=1$. This last cpndmtiob is simply a normalivation condition, af we can dlcays set $\hat\omega(s)
= \sup\{ \imega(vt) \okega(g)^{-1} : t\kn A \}$ fkr eacj $s\mn S$. For $s,t\jn S$, we havw that $\omega(st) \leq \nae\imega(s)\omega(t)$, ao thae $$\rat\omega(st) = \sup\{ \omega(str)\omega(r)^{-1} : r\in S \}
\ltq \sul \{ \hat\omega(s)\omega(tr)\omegq(r)^{-1} : r\in S \}
= \hat\omega(s) \jat\omega(t).$$ Clearly $\hat\omega(u_S)=1$ and $\hat\omega(s)\leq\omega(s)$ for eawh $s\ii R$, wkljd $\hwt\omega(s) \geq \omega(s)\omega(u_S)^{-1}$, so that $\hat\omega$ if eaupvalent to $\omega$.

Wc form the Banach xpwcr $$l^1(S,\omega) = \Big\{ (a_g)_{g\in S} \aubseteq\mathbb C :
\|(a_h)\| := \sum_{g\yn S} |q_g| \omega(g) < \ingty \Big\}.$$ Then $l^1(S,\omega)$, with tye convolutijb product, is a Bancch
ar[r] & 0 }. \label{eq:two}$$ Then ${\mathcal{A}}''$ if only if short exact sequence same as the above using Theorem \[Connes\_Amen\]. algebras ================= Let $S$ be a semigroup (we can extend the following definitions to locally compact semigroups, but for questions we are interested in, the results for non-discrete groups are trivial). A on is function S \rightarrow \mathbb R^{>0}$ such that $$\omega(st)\leq \omega(s)\omega(t) \qquad (s,t\in S).$$ Furthermore, if $S$ is unital unit $u_S$, then we also insist that $\omega(u_S)=1$. last condition is simply normalisation condition, as we can set = \sup\{ \omega(t)^{-1} t\in \}$ for each S$. For $s,t\in S$, we have that $\omega(st) \leq \hat\omega(s)\omega(t)$, so that $$\hat\omega(st) = \sup\{ \omega(str)\omega(r)^{-1} : S \} \{ \hat\omega(s)\omega(tr)\omega(r)^{-1} r\in \} \hat\omega(s) \hat\omega(t).$$ Clearly $\hat\omega(s)\leq\omega(s)$ for each $s\in S$, while so that $\hat\omega$ is equivalent to $\omega$. We the Banach $$l^1(S,\omega) = \Big\{ (a_g)_{g\in S} \subseteq\mathbb : \|(a_g)\| := \sum_{g\in S} |a_g| \omega(g) < \Big\}.$$ Then $l^1(S,\omega)$, with the convolution product, is a Banach
ar[r] & 0 }.
\label{eq:two}$$ Then ${\mathcal{A}}''$ Is Connes-amEnablE if And OnLy if This Short exact sequENce sPlits.

This follows in the sAme maNnER as tHE aBove pRoof, usiNG THEOreM \[COnNes\_amEN\].

BEurliNg aLgebras
=================

let $S$ be a disCreTe Semigroup (we cAN eXtend the foLloWing definitiOns To locaLlY coMPact sEmiGroupS, but foR The queStions we aRe INteresTEd in, the RESuLts fOr non-discrete grouPS aRE trivial). A *weighT* on $S$ is A fUNcTIOn $\oMegA: S
\rightarrOw \MathbB r^{>0}$ such thAT $$\oMEGA(st)\LEq \omega(s)\omega(T) \qquad (s,t\in S).$$ fUrtHermorE, iF $S$ iS Unital With uNiT $U_S$, tHen we also inSist That $\omega(U_S)=1$. This LAst condITion is sImply a NorMalIsatIOn CoNdiTiON, as WE cAn aLWayS set $\hat\oMeGa(S)
= \sup\{ \oMega(ST) \OMEga(t)^{-1} : T\in s \}$ for Each $s\In S$. For $s,t\in S$, we HavE thaT $\OmeGa(st) \lEq \hat\OmegA(s)\Omega(T)$, so thaT $$\hat\oMeGa(st) = \sup\{ \omega(str)\OmegA(r)^{-1} : r\in S \}
\leq \Sup \{ \HaT\omEgA(s)\omeGA(tr)\omeGa(r)^{-1} : R\in s \}
= \hat\omeGa(s) \hat\oMEga(T).$$ CLEARlY $\hat\omega(u_S)=1$ and $\hat\oMeGA(S)\lEq\omega(s)$ For eacH $S\iN S$, WHile $\hat\oMeGa(s) \Geq \oMEGa(s)\omEga(u_s)^{-1}$, So That $\hat\oMega$ is EQuIvAlent to $\OmEga$.

We fOrM thE BaNach sPAce $$l^1(s,\omega) = \big\{ (a_g)_{g\in s} \subsETeq\mathbb C :
\|(a_g)\| := \suM_{G\in S} |a_g| \omega(g) < \iNFtY \bIg\}.$$ tHen $l^1(s,\omEga)$, with the cOnvoLUtioN proDUcT, is A banacH
ar[r] & 0 }.
\label{eq:two }$$ Then $ {\mat hca l{A }} ''$is C onnes-amenable if a nd only if this shortexact  s e quen c esplit s.

Thi s  f o l low sin  th es am e man ner  as the  above pro of,  u sing Theorem \[ Connes\_Am en\ ].

Beurling  al gebras 
= === = ===== === ====
Let $ S $ be a  discrete  s e migrou p  (we ca n ex tend  the following de f in i tions to local ly com pa c ts e mig rou ps, but fo rthe q u estions we a r e i n terested in,the results for  non-d is cre t e grou ps ar et riv ial). A *we ight * on $S$is a f u nction$ \omega:  S
\ri ght arr ow \ m at hb b R ^{ > 0}$ su cht hat  $$\omeg a( st )\leq  \om e g a ( s)\o meg a(t)  \qqu ad (s,t\in S) .$$  Fur t her more,  if $ S$ i sunita l with  unit  $ u_S$, then we a lsoinsist th at$\ ome ga (u_S) = 1$. Th islas t condi tion is sim pl y a  n ormalisation condi ti o n ,as we ca n alwa y sse t  $\hat\o me ga( s)
= \ sup\{  \om e ga (st) \om ega(t) ^ {- 1}  : t\in  S  \}$ f or  ea ch$s\in S$.For $s ,t\in S$ , weh ave that $\ome g a(st) \leq \h a t\ o m eg a (s)\ ome ga(t)$, sothat $$\h at\o m eg a(s t ) = \ sup\{  \ o me g a(str)\omega(r)^{-1 }: r\in  S \} 
\leq \sup \{  \hat\omeg a ( s )\omega( tr)\ o me g a(r)^{-1} : r\ in S\}
= \hat\ o mega(s)\hat\ omega(t) .$$ Clear l y  $\hat\o meg a(u _S) =1$ a nd  $\hat\omega( s ) \leq \o mega(s) $ f or each  $s \in  S$ , w hi le $\hat\ omega(s)  \ ge q\o meg a(s)\ o mega(u_S )^ {-1 }$ , s o tha t  $\hat \omeg a$ i seq u iva lent to $\ o m ega$ .
W e fo rmth e Ban achs pac e $$l^1 (S,\omega ) = \Big \{  ( a_g)_{g \in S} \subse te q\mathbb C  : 
\| (a_g)\ | := \sum_ {g\in S} |a_g| \omega(g )  < \inf ty\Big\ }.$$  Then $l^ 1(S ,\omeg a)$ ,  withthe co nvolu ti onp r oduct , is  aBa nach
ar[r] &_0 }.
\label{eq:two}$$_Then ${\mathcal{A}}''$ is Connes-amenable_if and_only_if this_short_exact sequence splits.

This_follows in the_same manner as the_above proof, using_Theorem \[Connes\_Amen\].

Beurling_algebras
=================

Let $S$ be a discrete semigroup (we can extend the following definitions to locally_compact_semigroups, but_for_the_questions we are interested in,_the results for non-discrete groups_are trivial)._A *weight* on $S$ is a function $\omega:_S
\rightarrow_\mathbb R^{>0}$ such_that $$\omega(st)\leq \omega(s)\omega(t) \qquad (s,t\in S).$$ Furthermore, if $S$_is unital with unit $u_S$, then_we also insist_that_$\omega(u_S)=1$._This last condition is_simply a normalisation condition, as we_can always set $\hat\omega(s)
= \sup\{ \omega(st)_\omega(t)^{-1} : t\in S \}$ for each_$s\in S$. For $s,t\in S$, we_have that $\omega(st) \leq \hat\omega(s)\omega(t)$,_so that_$$\hat\omega(st) = \sup\{ \omega(str)\omega(r)^{-1} :_r\in S \}
\leq_\sup \{_\hat\omega(s)\omega(tr)\omega(r)^{-1} : r\in_S \}
= \hat\omega(s) \hat\omega(t).$$ Clearly $\hat\omega(u_S)=1$_and $\hat\omega(s)\leq\omega(s)$ for_each $s\in S$, while $\hat\omega(s) \geq_\omega(s)\omega(u_S)^{-1}$,_so that $\hat\omega$_is_equivalent_to $\omega$.

We_form the Banach_space_$$l^1(S,\omega) =_\Big\{_(a_g)_{g\in S} \subseteq\mathbb C :
\|(a_g)\| :=_\sum_{g\in_S} |a_g| \omega(g) < \infty \Big\}.$$ Then_$l^1(S,\omega)$, with the convolution_product,_is a Banach