 (1 - T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})}{| \det (1 - T_x \phi^{|t|} {\, | \,}T_x X)|} \overset{!}{=} W_x \;.$$ [**3)**]{} One can prove that in the manifold setting of theorem \[t33\] we have $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma)} {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = 1 \;.$$ By (\[eq:26\]), our working hypotheses \[t56\] is therefore compatible with formula (\[eq:12\]). Compatibility with conjecture \[t31\] is clear.\
[**4)**]{} We will see below that in our new context metrics $g$ on $T{{\mathcal F}}$ can exist for which the flow has the conformal behaviour (\[eq:22\]). Assuming we are in such a situation and that ${{\mathcal F}}$ is $2$-dimensional, we have: $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma)} {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = e^{kl (\gamma)} \quad \mbox{for} \; x \in \gamma, k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}}$$ and $$|\det (T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = e^t \quad \mbox{for a fixed point} \; x \;.$$ In the latter case, we even have by continuity: $$\det (T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}}) = e^t \;,$$ the determinant being positive for $t = 0$. Hence by (\[eq:28\]) the conjectured formula (\[eq:26\]) reads as follows in this case: $$\begin{aligned}
  \label{eq:29}
  \lefteqn{\sum^2_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}{{\mathcal L}}} (X))} \\
& = & \sum_{\gamma} l (\gamma) \left( \sum_{k \ge 1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) \delta_{kl (\gamma)} + \sum_{k \le -1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) e^{kl (\gamma)} \delta_{kl (\gamma
(1 - T_x \phi^t { \, | \,}T_x { { \mathcal F}})}{| \det (1 - T_x \phi^{|t| } { \, | \,}T_x X)| } \overset{!}{= } W_x \;.$$ [ * * 3) * * ] { } One can prove that in the manifold setting of theorem \[t33\ ] we have $ $ |\det (T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma) } { \, | \,}T_x { { \mathcal F}})| = 1 \;.$$ By (\[eq:26\ ]), our working guess \[t56\ ] is consequently compatible with formula (\[eq:12\ ]). Compatibility with conjecture \[t31\ ] is clear.\ 
 [ * * 4) * * ] { } We will visualize below that in our raw context metrics $ g$ on $ T{{\mathcal F}}$ can exist for which the flow have the conformal behaviour (\[eq:22\ ]). Assuming we are in such a situation and that $ { { \mathcal F}}$ is $ 2$-dimensional, we have: $ $ |\det (T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma) } { \, | \,}T_x { { \mathcal F}})| = e^{kl (\gamma) } \quad \mbox{for } \; x \in \gamma, k \in { { \mathbb{Z}}}$$ and $ $ |\det (T_x \phi^t { \, | \,}T_x { { \mathcal F}})| = e^t \quad \mbox{for a fixed compass point } \; x \;.$$ In the latter case, we even have by continuity: $ $ \det (T_x \phi^t { \, | \,}T_x { { \mathcal F } }) = e^t \;,$$ the determinant being incontrovertible for $ t = 0$. Hence by (\[eq:28\ ]) the conjectured formula (\[eq:26\ ]) reads as follows in this event: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   \label{eq:29 } 
   \lefteqn{\sum^2_{n=0 } (-1)^n { \mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^ * { \, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}{{\mathcal L } } } (X) ) } \\ 
 & = & \sum_{\gamma } l (\gamma) \left (\sum_{k \ge 1 } \varepsilon_{\gamma } (k) \delta_{kl (\gamma) } + \sum_{k \le -1 } \varepsilon_{\gamma } (k) e^{kl (\gamma) } \delta_{kl (\gamma
 (1 - H_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})}{| \dtt (1 - T_x \phi^{|t|} {\, | \,}T_x X)|} \overvet{!}{=} W_x \;.$$ [**3)**]{} One cxn prove that in the manifolv serting of theorem \[t33\] we have $$|\aet (T_x \php^{kl (\gamma)} {\, | \,}T_e {{\mathcal F}})| = 1 \;.$$ Bb (\[eq:26\]), our workihn hypmvheses \[t56\] is thetefore compadible with forkuua (\[eq:12\]). Compatibility with conjecture \[t31\] is clesr.\
[**4)**]{} We will see bglow uhae in our new context metrics $g$ on $T{{\matgcal F}}$ ban exist for whivh the flow has the conforlal hehaviour (\[eq:22\]). Assumlng we are un stxh a situatiun and thau ${{\kathcal F}}$ js $2$-dimensional, we have: $$|\det (T_x \pfi^{kl (\yamma)} {\, | \,}T_x {{\narhcwn F}})| = e^{kl (\ganma)} \qlad \mbox{for} \; w \in \gakma, k \im {{\mathbb{Z}}}$$ and $$|\cet (T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = e^t \quad \mbox{for a fixed pohnc} \; x \;.$$ In the latter cqsw, we gven vave vy zonuinnitg: $$\det (H_x \'hi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mzthcal F}}) = e^r \;,$$ the determinant neybg positive fkr $t = 0$. Hqnce by (\[eq:28\]) the conjectured formula (\[eq:26\]) rtads zs follows in this case: $$\begin{aligned}
  \label{ee:29}
  \lefteqg{\sum^2_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}{{\mathcal L}}} (X))} \\
& = & \sum_{\jaoma} l (\eqmla) \left( \sum_{k \ge 1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) \delta_{kl (\gaija)} + \xum_{k \le -1} \varepfilon_{\gamma} (l) f^{kk (\gamma)} \delta_{ku (\gammc
(1 - T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x \det - T_x {\, | \,}T_x One prove that in manifold setting of \[t33\] we have $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kl {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = 1 \;.$$ By (\[eq:26\]), our working hypotheses is therefore compatible with formula (\[eq:12\]). Compatibility with conjecture \[t31\] is clear.\ [**4)**]{} will below in new context metrics $g$ on $T{{\mathcal F}}$ can exist for which the flow has the conformal (\[eq:22\]). Assuming we are in such a situation that ${{\mathcal F}}$ is we have: $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kl {\, \,}T_x {{\mathcal = (\gamma)} \mbox{for} \; x \gamma, k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}}$$ and $$|\det (T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})| = e^t \quad \mbox{for fixed point} \;.$$ In latter we have by continuity: \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}}) the determinant being positive for $t = 0$. by (\[eq:28\]) conjectured formula (\[eq:26\]) reads as follows this case: $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:29} \lefteqn{\sum^2_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}{{\mathcal L}}} (X))} \\ & = & \sum_{\gamma} l (\gamma) \left( \sum_{k \ge 1} \delta_{kl (\gamma)} + \sum_{k -1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) (\gamma)} (\gamma
 (1 - T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal F}})}{| \det (1 - T_x \phi^{|t|} {\, | \,}t_x X)|} \overset{!}{=} w_x \;.$$ [**3)**]{} One Can ProVe That In thE manifold settiNG of tHeorem \[t33\] we have $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kL (\gammA)} {\, | \,}T_X {{\MathCAl f}})| = 1 \;.$$ By (\[eq:26\]), Our workINg HYPotHeSeS \[t56\] iS tHErEfore ComPatible With formulA (\[eq:12\]). coMpatibility wITh Conjecture \[T31\] is Clear.\
[**4)**]{} We will sEe bElow thAt In oUR new cOntExt meTrics $g$ ON $T{{\mathCal F}}$ can exIsT For whiCH the floW HAs The cOnformal behaviour (\[EQ:22\]). ASSuming we are in sUch a siTuATiON And ThaT ${{\mathcal F}}$ iS $2$-dImensIOnal, we hAVe: $$|\DET (t_x \pHI^{kl (\gamma)} {\, | \,}T_x {{\matHcal F}})| = e^{kl (\gamMA)} \quAd \mbox{FoR} \; x \iN \Gamma, k \In {{\matHbB{z}}}$$ anD $$|\det (T_x \phi^t {\, | \,}T_X {{\matHcal F}})| = e^t \quAd \mbox{FOr a fixeD Point} \; x \;.$$ IN the laTteR caSe, we EVeN hAve By COntINuIty: $$\DEt (T_X \phi^t {\, | \,}T_x {{\mAtHcAl F}}) = e^t \;,$$ The dETERMinaNt bEing PositIve for $t = 0$. Hence bY (\[eq:28\]) The cONjeCtureD formUla (\[eQ:26\]) rEads aS folloWs in tHiS case: $$\begin{alignEd}
  \laBel{eq:29}
  \leftEqn{\SuM^2_{n=0} (-1)^n {\MaThrm{TR}}(\Phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{h}}^n_{{{\mAthCal F}}{{\matHcal L}}} (X))} \\
& = & \sUM_{\gaMmA} L (\GAmMa) \left( \sum_{k \ge 1} \varepsIlON_{\GaMma} (k) \deltA_{kl (\gamMA)} + \sUm_{K \Le -1} \varepsIlOn_{\gAmma} (K) E^{Kl (\gamMa)} \deLTa_{Kl (\gamma
 (1 - T_x \phi^t {\, | \,} T_x {{\mat hcalF}} )}{ |\det  (1- T_x \phi^{|t | } {\ , | \,}T_x X)|} \overs et{!} {= }  W_x \; .$$ [ **3)**] { }O n e c an  p rov et ha t inthe  manifo ld setting  of  t heorem \[t33 \ ]we have $$ |\d et (T_x \phi ^{k l (\ga mm a)} {\, |  \, }T_x{{\mat h cal F} })| = 1 \ ;. $ $ By ( \ [eq:26\ ] ) ,ourworking hypothese s  \ [ t56\] is there fore c om p at i b lewit h formula(\ [eq:1 2 \]). Co m pa t i b ili t y with conjec ture \[t31\ ]  is  clear .\ 
[* * 4)**]{ } Wewi l l s ee below th at i n our new  conte x t metri c s $g$ o n $T{{ \ma thc al F } }$  c anex i stf or  wh i chthe flow  h as  theconf o r m a l be hav iour  (\[e q:22\]). Assu min g we are  in s uch a  sit ua tionand th at ${ {\ mathcal F}}$ is  $2$ -dimensio nal ,weha ve: $ $ |\det(T_ x \ phi^{kl  (\gamm a )}{\ , |  \ ,}T_x {{\mathcal F }} ) |  =  e^{kl ( \gamma ) }\q u ad \mbox {f or}  \;x \in \ gamm a ,k \in {{ \mathb b {Z }} }$$ and  $ $|\det  ( T_x  \p hi^t{ \, |  \,}T_ x {{\mat hcalF }})| = e^t \qu a d \mbox{for a fi x e dp oint } \ ; x \;.$$ I n th e  lat terc as e,w e eve n hav eb yc ontinuity: $$\det ( T_ x \phi ^t {\ , | \,}T_x {{ \mathcal F } } )  = e^t \ ;,$$ th e  determinant b eingpositive f o r $t = 0 $. He nce by ( \[eq:28\] ) the conj ect ure d f orm u l a(\[eq:26\]) r e a ds a sfollows  in  this c ase : $ $\b egi n{ aligned}  \label {e q: 29 }  \ lefte q n{\sum^2 _{ n=0 }(-1 )^n { \ mathrm {Tr}} (\ph i^ *{ \,| \,}{\ b ar { H }}^n _{ {{ \mat hca lF}}{{ \mat h cal  L}}} ( X))} \\
&  =&  \su m_ {\ gamma}l (\gamma) \l ef t( \sum_{k  \ ge1} \va r e psilon_{ \gamma} (k) \delta_{kl( \gamma) } +  \sum _{k\le -1} \ var epsilo n_{ \ gamma}  (k) e ^{kl(\ gam m a )} \d e l ta _{k l(\gamma
 (1_- T_x_\phi^t {\, | \,}T_x_{{\mathcal F}})}{|_\det_(1 -_T_x_\phi^{|t|} {\, |_\,}T_x X)|} \overset{!}{=}_W_x \;.$$ [**3)**]{} One_can prove that_in_the manifold setting of theorem \[t33\] we have $$|\det (T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma)} {\, |_\,}T_x_{{\mathcal F}})|_=_1_\;.$$ By (\[eq:26\]), our working_hypotheses \[t56\] is therefore compatible_with formula_(\[eq:12\]). Compatibility with conjecture \[t31\] is clear.\
[**4)**]{} We_will_see below that_in our new context metrics $g$ on $T{{\mathcal F}}$_can exist for which the flow_has the conformal_behaviour_(\[eq:22\])._Assuming we are in_such a situation and that ${{\mathcal_F}}$ is $2$-dimensional, we have: $$|\det_(T_x \phi^{kl (\gamma)} {\, | \,}T_x {{\mathcal_F}})| = e^{kl (\gamma)} \quad \mbox{for}_\; x \in \gamma, k_\in {{\mathbb{Z}}}$$_and $$|\det (T_x \phi^t {\,_| \,}T_x {{\mathcal_F}})| =_e^t \quad \mbox{for_a fixed point} \; x \;.$$_In the latter_case, we even have by continuity:_$$\det_(T_x \phi^t {\,_|_\,}T_x_{{\mathcal F}})_= e^t \;,$$_the_determinant being_positive_for $t = 0$. Hence by_(\[eq:28\])_the conjectured formula (\[eq:26\]) reads as follows_in this case: $$\begin{aligned}
__\label{eq:29}
  \lefteqn{\sum^2_{n=0} (-1)^n_{\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}{{\mathcal_L}}} (X))} \\
& = & \sum_{\gamma}_l (\gamma)_\left( \sum_{k_\ge 1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) \delta_{kl (\gamma)} + \sum_{k \le -1} \varepsilon_{\gamma}_(k) e^{kl (\gamma)} \delta_{kl (\gamma