 coefficients for very low $c$ and large $\lambda_x^+$, which are likely related to near-wall over-compensation, discussed in \[sec:err\].]{} This observed clustering may have implications for further model reduction by highlighting important regions of spectral space. [Finally, with the exception of some SQ coefficients at small $\lambda_x^+$ and $c\approx U_{cl}$, the large OS and SQ coefficients occupy the essentially the same regions of spectral space which is a reflection of the interactions between the two families of modes; this is discussed in detail in the next section.]{}

![Magnitudes of the total leading mode coefficients (a) $\sigma_1^\OS\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$, (b) $\sigma_1^\SQ\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\SQ/\SQ}}$ [larger than 1% of the maximum value over all of spectral space]{} for $\Rey=2003$. Marker sizes are proportional to the magnitude and are normalized by the maximum. [The axes show the full range of wave parameters included in the optimization.]{} \[fig:pointcloud\]](pointcloud.pdf){width="0.7\linewidth"}

Interpretation of the OS-SQ decomposition: a competition mechanism
------------------------------------------------------------------

It has been demonstrated that the performance of the optimization is greatly improved by employing the OS-SQ decomposition of the resolvent. Previous work reported similar results for channel ECS [@rosenberg2018; @rosenberg2019a]. In that case, the relatively poor performance of the traditional resolvent method was attributed to the fact that the $\eta$ response dominates under the kinetic energy norm. Thus, matching the statistics for $u$ (or $w$) results in under-prediction of the $v$ statistics, as observed in \[fig:kxspect,fig:ints\]. However, in the OS-SQ decomposition, isolating the $v$ response in only the OS modes allows $v$ and $\eta$, to be ‘tuned’ somewhat independently, with the role of the SQ modes then being to saturate the OS vorticity. The improved matching of all components in \[fig:ints\] indicates that this is also the case for fully-turbulent channel flow, where the dynamics are significantly more complex than for the aforementioned equilibria.

[To understand why the OS and SQ modes comprise a much more efficient basis, note that in certain cases
coefficients for very low $ c$ and large $ \lambda_x^+$, which are likely relate to approximate - wall over - compensation, discussed in \[sec: err\ ]. ] { } This ascertained clustering may have implications for further model decrease by highlight important region of spectral space. [ last, with the exception of some SQ coefficients at small $ \lambda_x^+$ and $ c\approx U_{cl}$, the big o and SQ coefficients occupy the essentially the same regions of apparitional space which is a reflection of the interactions between the two family of modes; this is discussed in contingent in the next department. ] { } 

! [ Magnitudes of the full leading mode coefficients (a) $ \sigma_1^\OS\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$, (b) $ \sigma_1^\SQ\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\SQ/\SQ}}$ [ large than 1% of the maximum value over all of spectral space ] { } for $ \Rey=2003$. Marker sizes are proportional to the magnitude and are normalized by the maximum. [ The axes show the full range of wave parameters included in the optimization. ] { } \[fig: pointcloud\]](pointcloud.pdf){width="0.7\linewidth " } 

 Interpretation of the OS - SQ decomposition: a competition mechanism 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 It has been demonstrated that the performance of the optimization is greatly better by employing the OS - SQ decomposition of the solvent. former work reported similar results for distribution channel ECS [ @rosenberg2018; @rosenberg2019a ]. In that case, the relatively poor performance of the traditional solvent method was attributed to the fact that the $ \eta$ response dominates under the kinetic energy norm. Thus, matching the statistics for $ u$ (or $ w$) results in under - prediction of the $ v$ statistics, as observed in \[fig: kxspect, figure: ints\ ]. However, in the OS - SQ decomposition, isolate the $ v$ response in only the OS modes allows $ v$ and $ \eta$, to be ‘ tune ’ somewhat independently, with the role of the SQ modes then being to impregnate the OS vorticity. The improved matching of all part in \[fig: ints\ ] indicates that this is also the character for fully - churning channel flow, where the moral force are significantly more complex than for the aforementioned equilibria. 

 [ To understand why the OS and SQ mode comprise a a lot more efficient basis, note that in sealed cases
 coffficients for very low $g$ and large $\lambbq_x^+$, whirh are mikely rdlated to near-wall over-compeisatuon, duscussed in \[sec:err\].]{} Thir observef clusteeing nay have implications fod furchxr model reductlon by highnighting impordavt regions of spectral space. [Finally, rith thr fxception of sjme XZ cosfficients at small $\lambda_x^+$ and $c\alprox U_{bl}$, the large OS amd SQ coefficients occupy hhe fssentially the sale regions if s[wctral space which is a reflection of the interactions between thd two families if mofgs; this is dmscussvd in detail lm the text sevtion.]{}

![Magnitudex oh thw total leading mode roefficients (a) $\sigma_1^\JS\sqrt{\tenvckmp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$, (b) $\sigma_1^\SW\swrt{\tetscokp{X}_{11}^{\SD/\WQ}}$ [uarfec tgan 1% ov tie maximum balue over qll of spectral spave]{} dor $\Rey=2003$. Marked sizef wre proportional to the magnitude and age nkrmalized by the maximun. [The axes show the foll range jf wave parameters included in the optimization.]{} \[fhg:poiitzlobe\]](poingxllud.pdf){width="0.7\linewidth"}

Interpretation of the OS-SZ dtcokposition: a coipetition mrcjamysm
------------------------------------------------------------------

It has beev demouatdated that the pervormancg of tye optimieatiom is greatly improved by employing the JW-SQ decomposition lf the resouvenj. Prevoous work reported simiuar desults for channel SZS [@rosenberg2018; @rosdnbvrg2019a]. In that case, the relativejy poor pxrforkance ow thg tradieional resllvenb method was attribkted jo the fact that the $\eta$ response dominates undxc the kinetic etercy norm. Chus, mstching the seatistics for $o$ (or $w$) refults in under-pgediction of the $v$ seatistics, as mhserved in \[fmg:kxspect,sig:ibts\]. Yowever, kn the OS-SQ devomposition, isolatibg the $v$ response ln onug the OS modes cuoows $v$ and $\eta$, yo ce ‘eujev’ somqfhat indepengentuy, doth tfe role of bhe SQ kodes then being to vatudate the OS vorticotn. The imptoved matshing of all vomponents in \[fig:ijts\] iidicatxs thay tris is also the case for fully-furbulent chwnnel flow, wrere the dynamicx are significantly more complex than fir the aforementiobed equilibria.

[To unbevstand why tie OS wnd SQ moges comprise a much nore efficient baxis, note that in certzin caves
coefficients for very low $c$ and large are related to over-compensation, discussed in have for further model by highlighting important of spectral space. [Finally, with the of some SQ coefficients at small $\lambda_x^+$ and $c\approx U_{cl}$, the large OS SQ coefficients occupy the essentially the same regions of spectral space which is reflection the between two families of modes; this is discussed in detail in the next section.]{} ![Magnitudes of the leading mode coefficients (a) $\sigma_1^\OS\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$, (b) $\sigma_1^\SQ\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\SQ/\SQ}}$ [larger 1% of the maximum over all of spectral space]{} $\Rey=2003$. sizes are to magnitude are normalized by maximum. [The axes show the full range of wave parameters included in the optimization.]{} \[fig:pointcloud\]](pointcloud.pdf){width="0.7\linewidth"} Interpretation of OS-SQ decomposition: mechanism ------------------------------------------------------------------ has demonstrated the performance of is greatly improved by employing the the resolvent. Previous work reported similar results for ECS [@rosenberg2018; In that case, the relatively poor of the traditional resolvent method was attributed to fact that the $\eta$ response dominates under the kinetic energy norm. Thus, matching the statistics (or $w$) results in of the $v$ as in However, the OS-SQ isolating the $v$ response in only the OS modes allows $v$ $\eta$, to be ‘tuned’ somewhat independently, with the role of modes being to saturate OS vorticity. The improved of components in \[fig:ints\] indicates is the channel where dynamics are significantly more than for the aforementioned equilibria. understand why the OS much more efficient basis, note that in certain
 coefficients for very low $c$ anD large $\lambDa_x^+$, whIch Are LiKely RelaTed to near-wall oVEr-coMpensation, discussed in \[sEc:err\].]{} thIS obsERvEd cluStering MAy HAVe iMpLiCatIoNS fOr furTheR model rEduction by HigHlIghting imporTAnT regions of SpeCtral space. [FiNalLy, with ThE exCEptioN of Some Sq coeffICients At small $\laMbDA_x^+$ and $c\APprox U_{cL}$, THe LargE OS and SQ coefficieNTs OCcupy the essentIally tHe SAmE REgiOns Of spectral SpAce whICh is a reFLeCTIOn oF The interactioNs between thE Two FamiliEs Of mODes; thiS is diScUSseD in detail in The nExt sectioN.]{}

![MagniTUdes of tHE total lEading ModE coEffiCIeNtS (a) $\sIgMA_1^\OS\SQrT{\teNScoMp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$, (b) $\SiGmA_1^\SQ\sqRt{\teNSCOMp{X}_{11}^{\Sq/\SQ}}$ [LargEr thaN 1% of the maximum ValUe ovER alL of spEctraL spaCe]{} For $\ReY=2003$. MarkeR sizeS aRe proportional tO the Magnitude And ArE noRmAlizeD By the mAxiMum. [the axes Show the FUll RaNGE Of Wave parameters inclUdED In The optimIzatioN.]{} \[FiG:pOIntcloud\]](PoIntClouD.PDf){widTh="0.7\liNEwIdth"}

InteRpretaTIoN oF the OS-Sq dEcompoSiTioN: a cOmpetITion MechanIsm
------------------------------------------------------------------

It has Been dEMonstrated that THe performance OF tHE OpTImizAtiOn is greatly ImprOVed bY empLOyIng THe OS-Sq decoMpOSiTIon of the resolvent. PrEvIous woRk repOrted similar rEsults for cHANNel ECS [@roSenbERg2018; @ROsenberg2019a]. In thaT case, The relativELy poor peRformAnce of thE traditioNAL resolveNt mEthOd wAs aTTRiButed to the facT THat tHe $\Eta$ respOnsE dominaTes UndEr tHe kInEtic energY norm. ThuS, mAtChInG thE statIStics for $U$ (oR $w$) rEsUltS in unDEr-predIctioN of tHe $V$ sTAtiStics, as OBsERVed iN \[fIg:KxspEct,FiG:ints\]. howeVEr, iN the OS-Sq decomposItiON, isoLaTiNg the $v$ rEsponse in only ThE OS modes alLoWs $v$ And $\eta$, TO Be ‘tuned’ sOmewhat independently, witH The role Of tHe SQ mOdes Then being To sAturatE thE oS vortIcity. THe impRoVed MATchinG OF aLl cOmPonents in \[fIG:IntS\] indiCaTes tHat this Is also the case for fuLLy-tUrbulent channEl fLow, wHERe The DYnAMicS aRE siGNIficantly more coMplex than fOr THe AforementiONed EqUilibriA.

[To undeRstanD Why the Os and SQ modEs comprisE a Much MORe eFficient baSis, note tHat in certAIn casES
 coefficients for very low  $c$ and l arge$\l amb da _x^+ $, w hich are likel y  rel ated to near-wall over -comp en s atio n ,discu ssed in \[ s e c:e rr \] .]{ }T hi s obs erv ed clus tering may  ha ve  implication s  f or further  mo del reductio n b y high li ght i ng im por tantregion s  of sp ectral sp ac e . [Fin a lly, wi t h  t he e xception of someS Qc oefficients at  small  $ \ la m b da_ x^+ $ and $c\a pp rox U _ {cl}$,t he l a rge OS and SQ coe fficients o c cup y thees sen t iallythe s am e  re gions of sp ectr al spacewhichi s a ref l ectionof the  in ter acti o ns  b etw ee n  th e  t wof ami lies ofmo de s; th is i s d i scus sed  indetai l in the next  se ctio n .]{ }

![ Magni tude sof th e tota l lea di ng mode coeffic ient s (a) $\s igm a_ 1^\ OS \sqrt { \tensc omp {X} _{11}^{ \OS/\OS } }$,  ( b ) $\ sigma_1^\SQ\sqrt{\ te n s co mp{X}_{1 1}^{\S Q /\ SQ } }$ [larg er  th an 1 % of th e ma x im um value  overa ll  o f spect ra l spac e] {}for  $\Re y =200 3$. Ma rker siz es ar e  proportionalt o the magnitu d ea n da re n orm alized by t he m a ximu m. [ T he  ax e s sho w the  f u ll range of wave param et ers in clude d in the opti mization.] { } \[fig:po intc l ou d \]](pointcloud .pdf) {width="0. 7 \linewid th"}
Interpr etation o f the OS-S Q d eco mpo sit i o n:  a competitio n mech an ism
--- --- ------- --- --- --- --- -- --------- -------- -- -- -- -- --- ----- - -----

I thas  b een  demo n strate d tha t th epe r for mance o f  t h e  opt im iz atio n i sgreat ly i m pro ved byemploying  th e  OS- SQ  d ecompos ition of there solvent. P re vio us wor k reported  similar results for ch a nnel EC S [ @rose nber g2018; @r ose nberg2 019 a ]. Inthat c ase,th e r e l ative l y  p oor  p erformance o f t he tr ad itio nal res olvent method wasa ttr ibuted to the  fa ct t h a tthe $\ e ta$  r e spo n s e dominates und er the kin et i cenergy nor m . T hu s, matc hing th e sta t isticsfor $u$ ( or $w$) r es ults i n u nder-predi ction of  the $v$s tatis t ic s, as  ob served  i n \ [fig: kxspec t ,fi g:int s\]. H ow ever,in th eOS-SQ de composition, isolatingthe $v $ res pon se in onl y t h e O S modes a llow s $v$ and$\e ta$ , tobe‘ tuned ’ so m ew hat indep ende n tly, with th e r o l eof the SQ m o d e s t hen b ein g  to sa tura te the OS vortici t y. The improve d ma t c hin g o f  all  c omponents in \ [fi g: i n ts\] ind ic ates that t his is a ls o  thecase f or ful ly-turb u l en t  chann el f low , where t hedy n amics a re  s i gnific antl ymore c omplex than f or the aforement ioned e quili b ria .

[T ounderst a nd w hy the OSand SQ mode s comp rise  a mu ch more  e fficie ntba sis, notet hat in ce rtain  cases
 coefficients_for very_low $c$ and large_$\lambda_x^+$, which_are_likely related_to_near-wall over-compensation, discussed_in \[sec:err\].]{} This_observed clustering may have_implications for further_model_reduction by highlighting important regions of spectral space. [Finally, with the exception of some_SQ_coefficients at_small_$\lambda_x^+$_and $c\approx U_{cl}$, the large_OS and SQ coefficients occupy_the essentially_the same regions of spectral space which is_a_reflection of the_interactions between the two families of modes; this is_discussed in detail in the next_section.]{}

![Magnitudes of the_total_leading_mode coefficients (a) $\sigma_1^\OS\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\OS/\OS}}$,_(b) $\sigma_1^\SQ\sqrt{\tenscomp{X}_{11}^{\SQ/\SQ}}$ [larger than 1% of_the maximum value over all of_spectral space]{} for $\Rey=2003$. Marker sizes are_proportional to the magnitude and are_normalized by the maximum. [The_axes show_the full range of wave_parameters included in_the optimization.]{}_\[fig:pointcloud\]](pointcloud.pdf){width="0.7\linewidth"}

Interpretation of the_OS-SQ decomposition: a competition mechanism
------------------------------------------------------------------

It has_been demonstrated that_the performance of the optimization is_greatly_improved by employing_the_OS-SQ_decomposition of_the resolvent. Previous_work_reported similar_results_for channel ECS [@rosenberg2018; @rosenberg2019a]. In_that_case, the relatively poor performance of the_traditional resolvent method was_attributed_to the fact that_the $\eta$ response dominates under_the kinetic energy norm. Thus, matching_the statistics_for $u$_(or $w$) results in under-prediction of the $v$ statistics, as observed_in \[fig:kxspect,fig:ints\]. However, in the OS-SQ_decomposition, isolating the $v$_response in_only_the OS modes_allows_$v$ and_$\eta$, to be ‘tuned’ somewhat independently, with_the role_of the SQ modes then being_to saturate the OS_vorticity._The improved matching of all components_in \[fig:ints\] indicates that this is_also the case for fully-turbulent_channel_flow,_where the dynamics are significantly_more complex than for the aforementioned_equilibria.

[To understand why_the OS and SQ modes comprise a_much_more efficient basis, note that in_certain_cases