 log (${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L^2)$) photonic radiative corrections[@precision]. The LEP1 CMS energy is taken to be the $Z$ mass, with an angular range between $1^\circ$ and $3^\circ$, while the LEP2 result is calculated at a CMS energy of 176 GeV and an angular range of $3^\circ - 6^\circ$. The portion of the error budget of interest here is the missing photonic ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L)$ contribution, which is due to all two-photon radiative corrections at next-to-leading log (NLL) order. For ILC physics, it is desirable to reach $0.01\%$ precision. This is in reach for BHLUMI. Here, we will concentrate on the photonic contributions.

The photonic part of the error estimate in Table 1 comes from comparing to an exact ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ calculation. There are three contributions: a double real emission term[@2real] which can reach 0.012%, a real plus virtual photon term[@real+virt] which is bounded by 0.02%, and a two-loop pure virtual correction[@precision; @BVNB] making up 0.014% in the LEP1 case. Adding these in quadrature gives the error quoted in Table 1. Since all of the exact ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ photonic radiative corrections are available, adding them to BHLUMI would remove almost all of the error quoted for these effects.

The only remaining exact two photon contribution would then be “up-down interference.” The entire ${\cal O}(\alpha)$ up-down interference effect was 0.011% at $3^\circ$ and 0.099% at $9^\circ$[@updown], and the ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ contribution to up-down interference would be supressed by an additional factor on the order of ${\alpha\over\pi}L 
\approx 0.04.$ This contribution may be neglected for small-angle Bhabha scattering. However, a complete calculation of ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ effects, including the full up-down interference contribution, could prove useful if the ILC requires a wider angular acceptance for the luminosity monitor. Some new ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ computational tools and results on Bhabha scattering have appeared recently[@dixon; @penin; @italian; @riemann; @
log ($ { \cal O}(\alpha^2 L^2)$) photonic radiative corrections[@precision ]. The LEP1 CMS energy is taken to be the $ Z$ mass, with an angular range between $ 1^\circ$ and $ 3^\circ$, while the LEP2 leave is account at a CMS energy of 176 GeV and an angular range of $ 3^\circ - 6^\circ$. The parcel of the erroneousness budget of interest here is the missing photonic $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2 L)$ contribution, which is ascribable to all two - photon radiative corrections at next - to - leading logarithm (NLL) decree. For ILC physics, it is desirable to strive $ 0.01\%$ precision. This is in reach for BHLUMI. Here, we will boil down on the photonic contributions. 

 The photonic character of the error estimate in mesa 1 comes from comparing to an exact $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2)$ calculation. There exist three contributions: a double real emission term[@2real ] which can achieve 0.012% , a real plus virtual photon term[@real+virt ] which is bounded by 0.02% , and a two - loop pure virtual correction[@precision; @BVNB ] making up 0.014% in the LEP1 shell. Adding these in quadrature gives the error quoted in Table 1. Since all of the exact $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2)$ photonic radiative corrections are available, adding them to BHLUMI would remove almost all of the error quoted for these effects. 

 The only remaining exact two photon contribution would then be “ up - down interference. ” The entire $ { \cal O}(\alpha)$ up - down intervention effect was 0.011% at $ 3^\circ$ and 0.099% at $ 9^\circ$[@updown ], and the $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2)$ contribution to up - down interference would be supressed by an extra agent on the decree of $ { \alpha\over\pi}L 
 \approx 0.04.$ This contribution may be neglected for small - angle Bhabha scattering. However, a complete calculation of $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2)$ effects, including the wide up - down interference contribution, could prove useful if the ILC requires a wider angular adoption for the luminosity monitor. Some new $ { \cal O}(\alpha^2)$ computational tools and results on Bhabha disperse have appear recently[@dixon; @penin; @italian; @riemann; @
 loh (${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L^2)$) photonic vadiative correcjiins[@prerision]. Fhe LEP1 ZMS energy is taken to be thx $Z$ nass, qith an angular range cetween $1^\cprc$ and $3^\curc$, xhile the LEP2 result is gclculzbed ac e CMS energy of 176 GeV and dn angular rance oy $3^\circ - 6^\circ$. The portion of the errow budgey lf interest hete is ehe jpswing photonic ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L)$ cohtributpon, which is due yo all two-photon radiative corgections at next-to-peading log (NLL) irder. For ILZ physics, pc is desiragle to reach $0.01\%$ precision. This is in rzach for BHOUNI. Jgre, we will roncennrate on the inotoniw controbutions.

The phptoiic part of the error estmmate in Table 1 comef from cokpcring to an exact ${\cal O}(\qlpha^2)$ calwulaguon. Thtre ade thrfe rontributiohs: a double real emission term[@2tewo] which can rsach 0.012%, w weal plus virtual photon term[@real+virt] wvicg is bounded by 0.02%, and a rwo-loop pure virtual forrectiog[@precision; @BVNB] making up 0.014% in the LEP1 case. Adding thesx kn wuwaeahure gives the error quoted in Table 1. Since ajm pf the exact ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ phoyojiv radiative cotrectioua zre available, addijg them to BYLUMI woujd rrmove almost all of the errir quoted fog thwse effects.

The onlv remaining zxact jwo phpton contribution would theh be “up-down interfersvce.” The entire ${\cxl P}(\anpha)$ up-down interference esfect was 0.011% at $3^\circ$ avd 0.099% st $9^\cirs$[@updown], anf the ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ contribktion tm up-down ijterference would be supressed ub an additionsl fabtor on tke ordcr of ${\alpha\over\[i}L 
\approx 0.04.$ Thns contrnbutiov may be nvglected hor small-angje Bhabha scadjering. Howevec, a complqte xalcylation uf ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ rffects, iueluding tye full up-down intcrfergnde contribution, coood prove usefuk iw tre IKC sequires a whder aneilar xcceptance nor the luminosity monitor. Vome new ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ cokpmtational tools agd results on Bhabha scattering have ap'eared resently[@dixon; @penin; @italian; @riemznn; @
log (${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L^2)$) photonic radiative corrections[@precision]. CMS is taken be the $Z$ between and $3^\circ$, while LEP2 result is at a CMS energy of 176 and an angular range of $3^\circ - 6^\circ$. The portion of the error of interest here is the missing photonic ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L)$ contribution, which is to two-photon corrections next-to-leading log (NLL) order. For ILC physics, it is desirable to reach $0.01\%$ precision. This is reach for BHLUMI. Here, we will concentrate on photonic contributions. The photonic of the error estimate in 1 from comparing an ${\cal calculation. There are contributions: a double real emission term[@2real] which can reach 0.012%, a real plus virtual photon term[@real+virt] which bounded by a two-loop virtual @BVNB] up 0.014% in case. Adding these in quadrature gives in Table 1. Since all of the exact O}(\alpha^2)$ photonic corrections are available, adding them to would remove almost all of the error quoted these effects. The only remaining exact two photon contribution would then be “up-down interference.” The O}(\alpha)$ up-down interference effect 0.011% at $3^\circ$ 0.099% $9^\circ$[@updown], the O}(\alpha^2)$ contribution up-down interference would be supressed by an additional factor on the of ${\alpha\over\pi}L \approx 0.04.$ This contribution may be neglected for scattering. a complete calculation ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ effects, including full interference contribution, could prove the requires acceptance the monitor. Some new ${\cal computational tools and results on scattering have appeared recently[@dixon;
 log (${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L^2)$) photonic radiAtive correCtionS[@prEciSiOn]. ThE LEP1 cMS energy is takEN to bE the $Z$ mass, with an angular Range BeTWeen $1^\CIrC$ and $3^\cIrc$, whilE ThE leP2 rEsUlT is CaLCuLated At a cMS enerGy of 176 GeV and An aNgUlar range of $3^\cIRc - 6^\Circ$. The porTioN of the error bUdgEt of inTeResT Here iS thE missIng phoTOnic ${\caL O}(\alpha^2 L)$ cOnTRibutiON, which iS DUe To alL two-photon radiatiVE cORrections at nexT-to-leaDiNG lOG (nLL) OrdEr. For ILC phYsIcs, it IS desiraBLe TO REacH $0.01\%$ Precision. This Is in reach foR bHLuMI. HerE, wE wiLL conceNtratE oN The Photonic conTribUtions.

The PhotonIC part of THe error EstimaTe iN TaBle 1 cOMeS fRom CoMParINg To aN ExaCt ${\cal O}(\alPhA^2)$ cAlculAtioN. tHERe arE thRee cOntriButions: a doublE reAl emISsiOn terM[@2real] WhicH cAn reaCh 0.012%, a reaL plus ViRtual photon term[@Real+Virt] which Is bOuNdeD bY 0.02%, and a TWo-loop PurE viRtual coRrectioN[@PreCiSION; @BvNB] making up 0.014% in the LEp1 cASE. ADding theSe in quADrAtURe gives tHe ErrOr quOTEd in TAble 1. sInCe all of tHe exacT ${\CaL O}(\Alpha^2)$ phOtOnic raDiAtiVe cOrrecTIons Are avaIlable, adDing tHEm to BHLUMI woulD Remove almost aLL oF THe ERror QuoTed for these EffeCTs.

ThE onlY ReMaiNIng exAct twO pHOtON contribution would tHeN be “up-dOwn inTerference.” The Entire ${\cal O}(\ALPHa)$ up-down InteRFeREnce effect was 0.011% aT $3^\circ$ And 0.099% at $9^\circ$[@uPDown], and tHe ${\cal o}(\alpha^2)$ coNtributioN TO up-down iNteRfeRenCe wOULd Be supressed by AN AddiTiOnal facTor On the orDer Of ${\aLphA\ovEr\Pi}L 
\approx 0.04.$ this contRiBuTiOn May Be negLEcted for SmAll-AnGle bhabhA ScatteRing. HOwevEr, A cOMplEte calcULaTIOn of ${\CaL O}(\AlphA^2)$ efFeCts, inCludINg tHe full uP-down inteRfeREnce CoNtRibutioN, could prove usEfUl if the ILC ReQuiRes a wiDER angular Acceptance for the luminosITy monitOr. SOme neW ${\cal o}(\alpha^2)$ comPutAtionaL toOLs and rEsults On BhaBhA scATTerinG HAvE apPeAred recentLY[@DixOn; @penIn; @ItalIan; @riemAnn; @
 log (${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L ^2)$) phot onicrad iat iv e co rrec tions[@precisi o n].The LEP1 CMS energy is  take nt o be th e $Z$  mass,w it h anan gu lar  r a ng e bet wee n $1^\c irc$ and $ 3^\ ci rc$, while t h eLEP2 resul t i s calculated  at  a CMS  e ner g y of176  GeVand an angula r range o f$ 3^\cir c  - 6^\c i r c$ . Th e portion of thee rr o r budget of in terest  h e re i s t hemissing ph ot onic$ {\cal O } (\ a l p ha^ 2  L)$ contribu tion, which isdue to  a llt wo-pho ton r ad i ati ve correcti onsat next-t o-lead i ng log( NLL) or der. F orILC  phy s ic s,  it  i s  de s ir abl e  to  reach $ 0. 01 \%$ p reci s i o n . Th isis i n rea ch for BHLUMI . H ere, wewillconce ntra te  on t he pho tonic  c ontributions.
Thephotonicpar tofth e err o r esti mat e i n Table  1 come s  fr om c o mp aring to an exact${ \ c al  O}(\alp ha^2)$ ca lc u lation.Th ere  are t hreecont r ib utions:a doub l ere al emis si on ter m[ @2r eal ] whi c h ca n reac h 0.012% , a r e al plus virtua l  photon term[ @ re a l +v i rt]whi ch is bound ed b y  0.0 2%,a nd  at wo-lo op pu re vi r tual correction[@pr ec ision;  @BVN B] making up0.014% int h e  LEP1 ca se.A dd i ng these in qu adrat ure givest he error  quot ed in Ta ble 1. Si n c e all of  th e e xac t $ { \ ca l O}(\alpha^2 ) $  pho to nic rad iat ive cor rec tio nsare  a vailable,  addingth em  t oBHL UMI w o uld remo ve  al mo stall o f  the e rrorquot ed  f o r t hese ef f ec t s .

T he  o nlyrem ai ningexac t  tw o photo n contrib uti o n wo ul dthen be  “up-down int er ference.”Th e e ntire$ { \cal O}( \alpha)$ up-down interf e rence e ffe ct wa s 0. 011% at $ 3^\ circ$and 0.099%  at $9 ^\cir c$ [@u p d own], a nd  th e${\cal O}( \ a lph a^2)$  c ontr ibution  to up-down interf e ren ce would be s upr esse d by  an ad d iti on a l f a c tor on the orde r of ${\al ph a \o ver\pi}L \ app ro x 0.04. $ Thiscontr i butionmay be ne glected f or  sma l l -an gle Bhabha  scatter ing. Howe v er, a co mplet e c alcula ti onof ${ \cal O } (\a lpha^ 2)$ ef fe cts, i nclud in g the fu ll up-down interference  contr ibuti on,  could pr ove use ful if th e IL C requires  awid er an gul a r acc epta n ce  fo r  thelumi n osity mon i to r.S o me  new ${\cal O } (\a lpha^ 2)$ comput atio nal tools and res u lts on Bhabhascat t e rin g h a ve a pp eared recently [@d ix o n ; @penin ;@italian; @ riemann;  @ 
 log_(${\cal O}(\alpha^2_L^2)$) photonic radiative corrections[@precision]._The LEP1_CMS_energy is_taken_to be the_$Z$ mass, with_an angular range between_$1^\circ$ and $3^\circ$,_while_the LEP2 result is calculated at a CMS energy of 176 GeV and an_angular_range of_$3^\circ_-_6^\circ$. The portion of the_error budget of interest here_is the_missing photonic ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 L)$ contribution, which is_due_to all two-photon_radiative corrections at next-to-leading log (NLL) order. For ILC_physics, it is desirable to reach_$0.01\%$ precision. This_is_in_reach for BHLUMI. Here,_we will concentrate on the photonic_contributions.

The photonic part of the error_estimate in Table 1 comes from comparing_to an exact ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ calculation._There are three contributions: a_double real_emission term[@2real] which can reach_0.012%, a real_plus virtual_photon term[@real+virt] which_is bounded by 0.02%, and a_two-loop pure virtual_correction[@precision; @BVNB] making up 0.014% in_the_LEP1 case. Adding_these_in_quadrature gives_the error quoted_in_Table 1._Since_all of the exact ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$_photonic_radiative corrections are available, adding them to_BHLUMI would remove almost_all_of the error quoted_for these effects.

The only remaining_exact two photon contribution would then_be “up-down_interference.” The_entire ${\cal O}(\alpha)$ up-down interference effect was 0.011% at $3^\circ$ and_0.099% at $9^\circ$[@updown], and the ${\cal_O}(\alpha^2)$ contribution to up-down_interference would_be_supressed by an_additional_factor on_the order of ${\alpha\over\pi}L 
\approx 0.04.$ This_contribution may_be neglected for small-angle Bhabha scattering._However, a complete calculation_of_${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ effects, including the full_up-down interference contribution, could prove useful_if the ILC requires a_wider_angular_acceptance for the luminosity monitor._Some new ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ computational tools_and results on_Bhabha scattering have appeared recently[@dixon; @penin; @italian;_@riemann;_@