|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leq \frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|.$$ From Lemma \[lemma:bounded\_spectral\], $\left\|{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}\right\| \leq \frac{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}$. Therefore, for $n$ large enough (say large enough for the left-hand parenthesis to be greater than zero), $$d_{\rm max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\rho\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ Taking the supremum over $\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)$, we finally obtain: $$\sup_{\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)} d_{\rm max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\kappa\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ thereby showing that $d_{\rm max}(\rho){\overset{\rm a.s.}{\longrightarrow}}0$ and $d_{\rm max}(\rho)=\mathcal{O}_p\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$ Now, that the control of $d_{\rm max}(\rho)$ is performed, we are in position to handle the difference $\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}$. We have: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}&=\frac{1-\rho}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{{\bf x}_i{\bf x}_i^*\left({\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\right)}{{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\frac{1}{N}{\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_
|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leq \frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|.$$ From Lemma \[lemma: bounded\_spectral\ ], $ \left\|{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}\right\| \leq \frac{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}$. Therefore, for $ n$ large enough (say large enough for the leftover - bridge player parenthesis to be greater than zero), $ $ d_{\rm max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\rho\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ lead the supremum over $ \rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)$, we last obtain: $ $ \sup_{\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right) } d_{\rm max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\kappa\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ thereby showing that $ d_{\rm max}(\rho){\overset{\rm a.s.}{\longrightarrow}}0 $ and $ d_{\rm max}(\rho)=\mathcal{O}_p\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$ immediately, that the command of $ d_{\rm max}(\rho)$ is performed, we are in military position to handle the difference $ \hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}$. We get: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}&=\frac{1-\rho}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{{\bf x}_i{\bf x}_i^*\left({\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\right)}{{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\frac{1}{N}{\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x } _
|\bolfsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leq \frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsimvol{\epsmlon}_n\|.$$ Fdom Lemmx \[lemma:bounded\_spectral\], $\left\|{\bllesymbil{\Sigma}_0}\right\| \leq \frac{\|\buldsymbol{\Digma}_N\|}{\lanbda_{\cm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}$. Tmzrefodc, for $i$ large enough (xay large anough for the ldfc-hand parenthesis to be greater than zero), $$d_{\tm max}(\rho) \leq \frwc{\frss{1}{\kapla}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\rho\frac{\lamgda_{\rm mpn}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_M)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kwppa}\|\holdsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ Taking the supwwmum over $\rhu\in\left[\kapka,1\xight)$, we fihally obtain: $$\sup_{\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\rkght)} b_{\rm max}(\rho) \oew \fgdc{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\uoldsyibol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\kappd\frac{\lakbda_{\rm min}(\boldxymuol{\Sugma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\vqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsimbol{\epsilmn}_u\|}}.$$ thereby showing thar $e_{\rm mdx}(\rhm){\ovefwet{\fm z.s.}{\kohgrighharcow}}0$ and $d_{\rm max}(\rho)=\mathxal{O}_p\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$ Njq, that the cohtrol jf $d_{\rm max}(\rho)$ is performed, we are in posiuion fo handle the differencw $\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbll{\Sigma}_0}$. Wq have: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}&=\frac{1-\sho}{n}\snm_{k=1}^n \yvwz{{\vf x}_i{\bf x}_i^*\left({\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\fr V}_N^{-1}(\gho){\bf x}_i\right)}{{\bf x}_l^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\ftaf{1}{N}{\ns x}_i^*{\boldsymbou{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\yr s}_
|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leq \frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|.$$ From Lemma \[lemma:bounded\_spectral\], $\left\|{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}\right\| min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}$. for $n$ enough (say large to greater than zero), max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\rho\frac{\lambda_{\rm Taking the supremum over $\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)$, we obtain: $$\sup_{\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)} d_{\rm max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\kappa\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ thereby showing that $d_{\rm max}(\rho){\overset{\rm a.s.}{\longrightarrow}}0$ $d_{\rm max}(\rho)=\mathcal{O}_p\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$ Now, that the control of $d_{\rm max}(\rho)$ is performed, we are position handle difference C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}$. We have: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}&=\frac{1-\rho}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{{\bf x}_i{\bf x}_i^*\left({\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\right)}{{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_
|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leQ \frac{1}{\kappa}\|\BoldsYmbOl{\ePsIlon}_N\|.$$ FroM Lemma \[lemma:bouNDed\_sPectral\], $\left\|{\boldsymbol{\SIgma}_0}\rIgHT\| \leq \FRaC{\|\boldSymbol{\SIGmA}_n\|}{\LamBdA_{\rM miN}(\bOLdSymboL{\SiGma}_N)}$. TheRefore, for $n$ LarGe Enough (say larGE eNough for thE leFt-hand parentHesIs to be GrEatER than ZerO), $$d_{\rm mAx}(\rho) \lEQ \frac{\fRac{1}{\kappa}\|\bOlDSymbol{\EPsilon}_n\|}{1-\SQRt{1-\Rho\fRac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\bolDSyMBol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsYmbol{\SIgMA}_N\|}}-\SQRt{\fRac{1}{\Kappa}\|\boldsYmBol{\epSIlon}_n\|}}.$$ TaKInG THE suPRemum over $\rho\iN\left[\kappa,1\rIGht)$, We finaLlY obTAin: $$\sup_{\Rho\in\LeFT[\kaPpa,1\right)} d_{\rm Max}(\rHo) \leq \frac{\Frac{1}{\kaPPa}\|\boldsYMbol{\epsIlon}_n\|}{1-\sQrt{1-\KapPa\frAC{\lAmBda_{\Rm MIn}(\bOLdSymBOl{\SIgma}_N)}{\|\bolDsYmBol{\SiGma}_N\|}}-\SQRT{\Frac{1}{\KapPa}\|\boLdsymBol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ thEreBy shOWinG that $D_{\rm maX}(\rho){\OvErset{\Rm a.s.}{\loNgrigHtArrow}}0$ and $d_{\rm max}(\rHo)=\maThcal{O}_p\leFt(\fRaC{1}{n}\rIgHt)$ Now, THat the ConTroL of $d_{\rm mAx}(\rho)$ is PErfOrMED, We Are in position to hanDlE THe DifferenCe $\hat{\bF c}_N(\RhO)-{\BoldsymbOl{\sigMa}_0}$. We HAVe: $$\begIn{alIGnEd}
\hat{\bf C}_n(\rho)-{\boLDsYmBol{\SigmA}_0}&=\fRac{1-\rho}{N}\sUm_{i=1}^N \frAc{{\bf x}_I{\Bf x}_i^*\Left({\bf X}_i^*{\boldsyMbol{\SIGma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\BF C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\rigHT)}{{\bF X}_I^*\hAT{\bf C}_n^{-1}(\rhO){\bf x}_i\frac{1}{N}{\bF x}_i^*{\bOLdsyMbol{\sIgMa}_0^{-1}}{\bF X}_
|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\| }\right) \ leq \ fra c{1 }{ \kap pa}\ |\boldsymbol{\ e psil on}_n\|.$$ From Lemma\[lem ma : boun d ed \_spe ctral\] ,  $ \ l eft \| {\ bol ds y mb ol{\S igm a}_0}\r ight\| \le q \ fr ac{\|\boldsy m bo l{\Sigma}_ N\| }{\lambda_{\ rmmin}(\ bo lds y mbol{ \Si gma}_ N)}$.T herefo re, for $ n$ largee nough ( s a ylarg e enough for thel ef t -hand parenthe sis to  b e  g r e ate r t han zero),  $ $d_{\ r m max}( \ rh o ) \le q  \frac{\frac{ 1}{\kappa}\ | \bo ldsymb ol {\e p silon} _n\|} {1 - \sq rt{1-\rho\f rac{ \lambda_{ \rm mi n }(\bold s ymbol{\ Sigma} _N) }{\ |\bo l ds ym bol {\ S igm a }_ N\| } }-\ sqrt{\fr ac {1 }{\ka ppa} \ | \ b olds ymb ol{\ epsil on}_n\|}}.$$Tak ingt hesupre mum o ver$\ rho\i n\left [\kap pa ,1\right)$, wefina lly obtai n:$$ \su p_ {\rho \ in\lef t[\ kap pa,1\ri ght)} d _ {\r mm a x }( \rho) \leq \frac{\ fr a c {1 }{\kappa }\|\bo l ds ym b ol{\epsi lo n}_ n\|} { 1 -\sqr t{1- \ ka ppa\frac {\lamb d a_ {\ rm min} (\ boldsy mb ol{ \Si gma}_ N )}{\ |\bold symbol{\ Sigma } _N\|}}-\sqrt{\ f rac{1}{\kappa } \| \ b ol d symb ol{ \epsilon}_n \|}} . $$ t here b ysho w ing t hat $ d_ { \r m  max}(\rho){\overse t{ \rm a. s.}{\ longrightarro w}}0$ and$ d _ {\rm max }(\r h o) = \mathcal{O}_p\ left( \frac{1}{n } \right)$  Now,  that th e control o f $d_{\r m m ax} (\r ho) $ is  performed, w e arein  positi onto hand lethe  di ffe re nce $\hat {\bf C}_ N( \r ho )- {\b oldsy m bol{\Sig ma }_0 }$ . W e hav e : $$\b egin{ alig ne d} \ha t{\bf C } _N ( \ rho) -{ \b olds ymb ol {\Sig ma}_ 0 }&= \frac{1 -\rho}{n} \su m _{i= 1} ^n  \frac{ {\bf x}_i{\bf  x }_i^*\left ({ \bf  x}_i^ * { \boldsym bol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\ bfx}_i^ *\ha t{\bf C}_ N^{ -1}(\r ho) { \bf x} _i\rig ht)}{ {\ bfx } _i^*\ h a t{ \bf  C }_N^{-1}(\ r h o){ \bf x }_ i\fr ac{1}{N }{\bf x}_i^*{\bold s ymb ol{\Sigma}_0^ {-1 }}{\ b f  x }_
|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}\right) \leq_\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|.$$ From_Lemma \[lemma:bounded\_spectral\], $\left\|{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}\right\| \leq_\frac{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}$._Therefore,_for $n$_large_enough (say large_enough for the_left-hand parenthesis to be_greater than zero),_$$d_{\rm_max}(\rho) \leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\rho\frac{\lambda_{\rm min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$ Taking the supremum over $\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)$, we finally obtain: $$\sup_{\rho\in\left[\kappa,1\right)} d_{\rm_max}(\rho)_\leq \frac{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}{1-\sqrt{1-\kappa\frac{\lambda_{\rm_min}(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N)}{\|\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_N\|}}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{\kappa}\|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_n\|}}.$$_thereby_showing that $d_{\rm max}(\rho){\overset{\rm a.s.}{\longrightarrow}}0$_and $d_{\rm max}(\rho)=\mathcal{O}_p\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$ Now, that_the control_of $d_{\rm max}(\rho)$ is performed, we are in_position_to handle the_difference $\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}$. We have: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{\bf C}_N(\rho)-{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0}&=\frac{1-\rho}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{{\bf x}_i{\bf_x}_i^*\left({\bf x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf x}_i-{\bf x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\right)}{{\bf_x}_i^*\hat{\bf C}_N^{-1}(\rho){\bf x}_i\frac{1}{N}{\bf_x}_i^*{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_0^{-1}}{\bf_x}_