ynmandiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){width="8cm"}

Dark Mediator Dark Matter
=========================

Given its apparently long lifetime, most models of DM include some symmetry under which the DM candidate is charged to make it stable. An interesting possibility is that not only the DM candidate, but also the mediator connecting it to the visible sector is charged under this dark symmetry. Such a ‘dark mediator’ $\phi$ could only couple to the SM fields in pairs.

As a simple example, consider real or complex SM singlet scalars $\phi_i$ coupled to quarks, along with Yukawa couplings to a Dirac fermion DM candidate $\chi$. The terms in the effective Lagrangian relevant for direct detection are $$\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{DM}  \supset 
 \displaystyle{\sum_{i,j}^{n_{\phi}}}\,\frac{1}{\Lambda_{ij}} \bar q\,q \,\phi_i \phi_j^* + \displaystyle{\sum_{i}^{n_{\phi}}}\left ( y^{\phi_i}_\chi \overline{\chi^c}\chi \phi_i + h.c. \right)+...
\label{eq:dmDM}$$ where $\ldots$ stands for $\phi, \chi$ mass terms, as well as the rest of the dark sector, which may be more complicated than this minimal setup. This interaction structure can be enforced by a $\mathbb{Z}_4$ symmetry. To emphasize the new features of this model for direct detection, we focus on the minimal case with a single mediator $n_\phi = 1$ (omitting the $i$-index). However, the actual number of dark mediators is important for interpreting indirect constraints [@dmDM].

The leading order process for DM-nucleus scattering is $\chi N \to \bar \chi N \phi$ if $m_\phi \lesssim \mathcal{O}(10 \kev)$. However, an elastic scattering $\chi N \to \chi N$ is always present at loop-level since it satisfies all possible symmetries, see [Fig. \[f.feynmandiagram\]]{}. Which of the two possibilities dominates direct detection depends on the size of the Yukawa couplings $y_\chi^{\phi_i}$ as well as the dark mediator masses.

Previous modifications to WIMP-nucleon scattering kinematics include the introduction of a mass splitting [@TuckerSmith:2001hy; @Graham:2010ca
ynmandiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){width="8 cm " } 

 Dark Mediator Dark Matter 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Given its apparently long lifetime, most model of DM admit some symmetry under which the DM candidate is charge to cause it stable. An interesting possibility is that not entirely the DM campaigner, but also the mediator connecting it to the visible sector is charged under this dark symmetry. Such a ‘ colored mediator ’ $ \phi$ could only couple to the SM field in pairs. 

 As a simple case, consider real or complex SM singlet scalars $ \phi_i$ match to quarks, along with Yukawa couplings to a Dirac fermion DM candidate $ \chi$. The term in the effective Lagrangian relevant for direct detection are $ $ \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{DM }   \supset 
  \displaystyle{\sum_{i, j}^{n_{\phi}}}\,\frac{1}{\Lambda_{ij } } \bar q\,q \,\phi_i \phi_j^ * + \displaystyle{\sum_{i}^{n_{\phi}}}\left (y^{\phi_i}_\chi \overline{\chi^c}\chi \phi_i + h.c. \right)+... 
 \label{eq: dmDM}$$ where $ \ldots$ stands for $ \phi, \chi$ mass footing, as well as the rest of the dark sector, which may be more complicated than this minimal setup. This interaction structure can be enforce by a $ \mathbb{Z}_4 $ symmetry. To emphasize the new features of this model for direct detection, we focus on the minimal case with a single mediator $ n_\phi = 1 $ (omitting the $ i$-index). However, the actual number of dark mediators is important for interpreting indirect constraint [ @dmDM ]. 

 The leading order summons for DM - core scattering is $ \chi N \to \bar \chi N \phi$ if $ m_\phi \lesssim \mathcal{O}(10 \kev)$. However, an elastic scattering $ \chi N \to \chi N$ is always present at loop topology - level since it satisfies all possible symmetries, determine [ Fig.   \[f.feynmandiagram\ ] ] { }. Which of the two possibilities dominates direct detection depends on the size of the Yukawa couplings $ y_\chi^{\phi_i}$ equally well as the dark mediator masses. 

 Previous modifications to WIMP - nucleon scattering kinematics include the introduction of a batch splitting [ @TuckerSmith:2001hy; @Graham:2010ca
ynmwndiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){widuh="8cm"}

Dark Mediator Dark Metter
=========================

Giben its xpparently long lifetime, mosv moeels if DM include some symoetry undvr which rhe VM candidate is rgarged bj maic it vvable. An interexting posshbility is thad voc only the DM candidate, but also the mediatpr connecting it to uhe visjble sector is charged under this sark sykmetry. Such a ‘dark mediator’ $\phi$ could ojly fouple to the SM flelds in paurs.

Af a simple exxmple, conspber real or complex SM singlet scalars $\phi_k$ cou'led to quatka, wnong with Ynkawa bouplings to a Dirac xermion DM candidate $\ghi$. Tie twrms in the effective Lagrangian relevagt for diseet detection are $$\mathxao{L}_\matvrm{DK}  \sjpseg 
 \sixpmaystype{\snm_{i,j}^{n_{\phi}}}\,\frad{1}{\Lambda_{ij}} \bqr q\,q \,\phi_i \phi_j^* + \dixpjqystyle{\sum_{i}^{n_{\pgi}}}\left ( r^{\phi_i}_\chi \overline{\chi^c}\chi \phi_i + h.c. \right)+...
\nabsl{eq:dmDM}$$ where $\ldots$ stqnds for $\phi, \chi$ mass terms, as well as the rest of the dark sector, which may be more zomkllgatea tjan this minimal setup. This interaction strucehrt csn be enforced by a $\mathbn{Z}_4$ suimetry. To empfasize ths new features of hhis moqel fir direct detrction, we focus on the mininal case witk a single mediator $n_\'hi = 1$ (omittiug the $i$-indrx). However, the actual nbmber kf dark medlators is kmportant for ingerirethng indirect constraints [@diDM].

The leeding order orocgss for DM-nucleus scatbaring is $\chi N \to \har \cki N \[hi$ if $m_\phl \lesssim \mathcal{O}(10 \kev)$. However, ei elastic scajtesinc $\chi N \co \chi N$ is always [resent at look-level siuce it satisfies all povsible symmqtries, see [Fic. \[v.feynmandiagcam\]]{}. Which of rhe rwo posrkbilities domimates dirvcu detectiob depends on the slze ow the Yukawa cou'uungs $y_\chi^{\phi_i}$ ax wdll ad vhe dwsk mediator kassds.

Pfrviour modificatlonr to WIMP-nucleon scatterhng iinematics include tme introdoction of a mass splitying [@TuckerSmith:2001hy; @Grahem:2010ca
ynmandiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){width="8cm"} Dark Mediator Dark Matter ========================= Given long most models DM include some candidate charged to make stable. An interesting is that not only the DM but also the mediator connecting it to the visible sector is charged under dark symmetry. Such a ‘dark mediator’ $\phi$ could only couple to the SM in As simple consider real or complex SM singlet scalars $\phi_i$ coupled to quarks, along with Yukawa couplings to Dirac fermion DM candidate $\chi$. The terms in effective Lagrangian relevant for detection are $$\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{DM} \supset \displaystyle{\sum_{i,j}^{n_{\phi}}}\,\frac{1}{\Lambda_{ij}} q\,q \phi_j^* + ( \overline{\chi^c}\chi + h.c. \right)+... where $\ldots$ stands for $\phi, \chi$ mass terms, as well as the rest of the dark sector, may be than this setup. interaction can be enforced $\mathbb{Z}_4$ symmetry. To emphasize the new model for direct detection, we focus on the case with single mediator $n_\phi = 1$ (omitting $i$-index). However, the actual number of dark mediators important for interpreting indirect constraints [@dmDM]. The leading order process for DM-nucleus scattering is $\chi \bar \chi N \phi$ $m_\phi \lesssim \mathcal{O}(10 However, elastic $\chi \to \chi is always present at loop-level since it satisfies all possible symmetries, [Fig. \[f.feynmandiagram\]]{}. Which of the two possibilities dominates direct detection the of the Yukawa $y_\chi^{\phi_i}$ as well as dark masses. Previous modifications to kinematics the mass [@TuckerSmith:2001hy;
ynmandiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){wIdth="8cm"}

Dark mediaTor darK MAtteR
=========================

GivEn its apparentlY Long Lifetime, most models of DM IncluDe SOme sYMmEtry uNder whiCH tHE dM cAnDiDatE iS ChArged To mAke it stAble. An inteResTiNg possibilitY Is That not onlY thE DM candidate, But Also thE mEdiATor coNneCting It to thE VisiblE sector is ChARged unDEr this dARK sYmmeTry. Such a ‘dark mediaTOr’ $\PHi$ could only couPle to tHe sm fIELds In pAirs.

As a simPlE examPLe, consiDEr REAL or COmplex SM singlEt scalars $\phI_I$ coUpled tO qUarKS, along With YUkAWa cOuplings to a diraC fermion Dm candiDAte $\chi$. THE terms iN the efFecTivE LagRAnGiAn rElEVanT FoR diREct DetectioN aRe $$\MathcAl{L}_\mATHRM{DM}  \sUpsEt 
 \diSplayStyle{\sum_{i,j}^{n_{\phI}}}\,\frAc{1}{\LaMBda_{Ij}} \bar Q\,q \,\phi_I \phi_J^* + \dIsplaYstyle{\Sum_{i}^{n_{\PhI}}}\left ( y^{\phi_i}_\chi \ovErliNe{\chi^c}\chi \Phi_I + h.C. \riGhT)+...
\labeL{Eq:dmDM}$$ WheRe $\lDots$ staNds for $\pHI, \chI$ mASS TeRms, as well as the rest Of THE dArk sectoR, which MAy Be MOre complIcAteD thaN THis miNimaL SeTup. This iNteracTIoN sTructurE cAn be enFoRceD by A $\mathBB{Z}_4$ syMmetry. to emphasIze thE New features of tHIs model for dirECt DETeCTion, We fOcus on the miNimaL Case With A SiNglE MediaTor $n_\pHi = 1$ (OMiTTing the $i$-index). HoweveR, tHe actuAl numBer of dark mediAtors is impORTAnt for inTerpREtINg indirect consTrainTs [@dmDM].

The lEAding ordEr proCess for Dm-nucleus sCATtering iS $\chI N \tO \baR \chI n \PhI$ if $m_\phi \lesssiM \MAthcAl{o}(10 \kev)$. HowEveR, an elasTic ScaTteRinG $\cHi N \to \chi N$ Is always PrEsEnT aT loOp-levEL since it SaTisFiEs aLl posSIble syMmetrIes, sEe [fiG. \[F.feYnmandiAGrAM\]]{}. whicH oF tHe twO poSsIbiliTies DOmiNates diRect detecTioN DepeNdS oN the sizE of the Yukawa cOuPlings $y_\chi^{\PhI_i}$ aS well aS THe dark meDiator masses.

Previous modIFicatioNs tO WIMP-NuclEon scatteRinG kinemAtiCS incluDe the iNtrodUcTioN OF a masS SPlIttInG [@TuckerSmiTH:2001Hy; @GRaham:2010Ca
ynmandiagram"}](dd_process _prl__1){w idth= "8c m"} 
Dark  Med iator Dark Mat t er
= ====================== ==

G iv e n it s  a ppare ntly lo n gl i fet im e,  mo st mo delsofDM incl ude some s ymm et ry under whi c hthe DM can did ate is charg edto mak eits table . A n int eresti n g poss ibility i st hat no t  only t h e  D M ca ndidate, but also th e  mediator conn ecting  i t  t o the  vi sible sect or  is c h arged u n de r t his dark symmetry . Such a ‘d a rkmediat or ’ $ \ phi$ c ouldon l y c ouple to th e SM  fields i n pair s .

As a simpleexampl e,con side r  r ea l o rc omp l ex  SM sin glet sca la rs  $\ph i_i$ c o u pled  to  qua rks,along with Yu kaw a co u pli ngs t o a D irac  f ermio n DM c andid at e $\chi$. The t erms  in the e ffe ct ive  L agran g ian re lev ant  for di rect de t ect io n a re  $$\mathcal{L}_\ma th r m {D M}  \sup set 
\ di sp l aystyle{ \s um_ {i,j } ^ {n_{\ phi} } }\ ,\frac{1 }{\Lam b da _{ ij}} \b ar  q\,q\, \ph i_i  \phi _ j^*+ \dis playstyl e{\su m _{i}^{n_{\phi} } }\left ( y^{\ p hi _ i }_ \ chi\ov erline{\chi ^c}\ c hi \ phi_ i  +  h. c . \ri ght)+ .. . 
\ l abel{eq:dmDM}$$ whe re  $\ldo ts$ s tands for $\p hi, \chi$m a s s terms,  asw el l  as the rest o f the  dark sect o r, which  maybe morecomplicat e d  than th ismin ima l s e t up . This intera c t ionst ructure  ca n be en for ced  by  a$\ mathbb{Z} _4$ symm et ry .To  em phasi z e the ne wfea tu res  of t h is mod el fo r di re ct det ection, we f ocus  o nthemin im al ca se w i tha singl e mediato r $ n _\ph i=1$ (omi tting the $i$ -i ndex). How ev er,  the a c t ual numb er of dark mediators is importa ntfor i nter preting i ndi rect c ons t raints  [@dmD M].
Th e l e a dingo r de r p ro cess for D M - nuc leussc atte ring is  $\chi N \to \bar\ chi  N \phi$ if $ m_\ phi\ l es ssi m  \ m ath ca l {O} ( 1 0 \kev)$. Howev er, an ela st i cscattering $\c hi  N \to\chi N$  is a l ways pr esent atloop-leve lsinc e itsatisfiesall poss ible symm e tries ,  s ee [F ig.  \[f.f ey nma ndiag ram\]] { }.Which  of th etwo po ssibi li ties dom inates direct detection  depen ds on  th e size of  th e  Yu kawa coup ling s $y_\chi^ {\p hi_ i}$ a s w e ll as  the da rkm ediat or m a sses.

Pr e vi ous m od ificationst o WIM P-nuc leo n  scatt erin g kinematics incl u de the introdu ctio n ofa m a ss s pl itting [@Tucke rSm it h : 2001hy;@G raham:2010c a
ynmandiagram"}](dd_process_prl__1){width="8cm"}

Dark Mediator_Dark Matter
=========================

Given_its apparently long lifetime,_most models_of_DM include_some_symmetry under which_the DM candidate_is charged to make_it stable. An_interesting_possibility is that not only the DM candidate, but also the mediator connecting it_to_the visible_sector_is_charged under this dark symmetry._Such a ‘dark mediator’ $\phi$_could only_couple to the SM fields in pairs.

As a_simple_example, consider real_or complex SM singlet scalars $\phi_i$ coupled to quarks,_along with Yukawa couplings to a_Dirac fermion DM_candidate_$\chi$._The terms in the_effective Lagrangian relevant for direct detection_are $$\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{DM}  \supset 
 \displaystyle{\sum_{i,j}^{n_{\phi}}}\,\frac{1}{\Lambda_{ij}}_\bar q\,q \,\phi_i \phi_j^* + \displaystyle{\sum_{i}^{n_{\phi}}}\left (_y^{\phi_i}_\chi \overline{\chi^c}\chi \phi_i + h.c. \right)+...
\label{eq:dmDM}$$_where $\ldots$ stands for $\phi,_\chi$ mass_terms, as well as the_rest of the_dark sector,_which may be_more complicated than this minimal setup._This interaction structure_can be enforced by a $\mathbb{Z}_4$_symmetry._To emphasize the_new_features_of this_model for direct_detection,_we focus_on_the minimal case with a single_mediator_$n_\phi = 1$ (omitting the $i$-index). However,_the actual number of_dark_mediators is important for_interpreting indirect constraints [@dmDM].

The leading_order process for DM-nucleus scattering is_$\chi N_\to \bar_\chi N \phi$ if $m_\phi \lesssim \mathcal{O}(10 \kev)$. However, an elastic_scattering $\chi N \to \chi N$_is always present at_loop-level since_it_satisfies all possible_symmetries,_see [Fig. \[f.feynmandiagram\]]{}._Which of the two possibilities dominates direct_detection depends_on the size of the Yukawa_couplings $y_\chi^{\phi_i}$ as well_as_the dark mediator masses.

Previous modifications to_WIMP-nucleon scattering kinematics include the introduction_of a mass splitting [@TuckerSmith:2001hy;_@Graham:2010ca