 of Schwartz distributions on an open subset $J$ of ${{\mathbb{R}}}$.

\[t31\] For $X, {{\mathcal F}}$ and $\phi$ as above there exists a natural definition of a ${{\mathcal D}}' ({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$-valued trace of $\phi^*$ on the reduced leafwise cohomology ${\bar{H}}^{{\raisebox{0.05cm}{$\scriptscriptstyle \bullet$}}}_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)$ such that in ${{\mathcal D}}' ({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$ we have: $$\label{eq:11}
\sum\limits^{\dim {{\mathcal F}}}_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)) = \sum\limits_{\gamma} l (\gamma) \sum\limits^{\infty}_{k=1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) \delta_{kl (\gamma)} + \sum\limits_x \varepsilon_x |1 - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1} \;.$$

Here $\gamma$ runs over the closed orbits of $\phi$ which are not contained in a leaf and $x$ over the fixed points. For $a \in {{\mathbb{R}}}, \delta_a$ is the Dirac distribution in $a$ and $\kappa_x$ is defined by the action of $T_x \phi^t$ on the $1$-dimensional vector space $T_x X / T_x {{\mathcal F}}$. That action is multiplication by $e^{\kappa_x t}$ for some $\kappa_x \in {{\mathbb{R}}}$ and all $t$.

The conjecture is not known (except for $\dim X = 1$) if $\phi$ has fixed points. It may well have to be amended somewhat in that case. The analytic difficulty in the presence of fixed points lies in the fact that in this case $\Delta_{{{\mathcal F}}}$ has no chance to be transversally elliptic to the ${{\mathbb{R}}}$-action by the flow, so that the methods of transverse index theory do not apply directly. In the simpler case when the flow is everywhere transversal to ${{\mathcal F}}$, Álvarez López and Kordyukov have proved a beautiful strengthening of the conjecture. Partial results were obtained by other methods in [@Laz], [@DS2]. We now describe their result in a convenient way for our
of Schwartz distributions on an open subset $ J$ of $ { { \mathbb{R}}}$. 

 \[t31\ ] For $ X, { { \mathcal F}}$ and $ \phi$ as above there exists a lifelike definition of a $ { { \mathcal D } }' ({ { \mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$-valued touch of $ \phi^*$ on the reduced leafwise cohomology $ { \bar{H}}^{{\raisebox{0.05cm}{$\scriptscriptstyle \bullet$}}}_{{{\mathcal F } } } (X)$ such that in $ { { \mathcal D } }' ({ { \mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$ we have: $ $ \label{eq:11 } 
 \sum\limits^{\dim { { \mathcal F}}}_{n=0 } (-1)^n { \mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^ * { \, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F } } } (X) ) = \sum\limits_{\gamma } l (\gamma) \sum\limits^{\infty}_{k=1 } \varepsilon_{\gamma } (k) \delta_{kl (\gamma) } + \sum\limits_x \varepsilon_x |1 - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1 } \;.$$ 

 Here $ \gamma$ footrace over the close orbits of $ \phi$ which are not contained in a leaf and $ x$ over the fix item. For $ a \in { { \mathbb{R } } }, \delta_a$ is the Dirac distribution in $ a$ and $ \kappa_x$ is defined by the military action of $ T_x \phi^t$ on the $ 1$-dimensional vector space $ T_x X / T_x { { \mathcal F}}$. That legal action is multiplication by $ e^{\kappa_x t}$ for some $ \kappa_x \in { { \mathbb{R}}}$ and all $ t$. 

 The conjecture is not know (except for $ \dim X = 1 $) if $ \phi$ has fixed points. It may well have to be amended slightly in that case. The analytic difficulty in the presence of cook points lies in the fact that in this case $ \Delta_{{{\mathcal F}}}$ has no chance to be transversely elliptic to the $ { { \mathbb{R}}}$-action by the stream, so that the methods of transverse index hypothesis do not apply directly. In the simpler case when the flow is everywhere transversal to $ { { \mathcal F}}$, Álvarez López and Kordyukov have proved a beautiful strengthening of the conjecture. Partial results were obtained by other methods in [ @Laz ], [ @DS2 ]. We now describe their result in a convenient way for our
 of Schwartz distributions un an open subsgt $J$ of ${{\kathbb{D}}}$.

\[t31\] For $X, {{\mathcal F}}$ and $\phi$ as above vherw exiwts a natural definitiun of a ${{\mwthcal D}}' ({{\matibb{R}}}^{>0})$-valued trace of $\phi^*$ on the veduczd leafwise cohokology ${\bar{V}}^{{\raisebox{0.05cm}{$\scrhpgseriptstyle \bullet$}}}_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)$ such thwt in ${{\mstjcal D}}' ({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$ we nwve: $$\mabel{eq:11}
\sum\limits^{\dim {{\mathcal F}}}_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mzthrm{Tr}}(\khi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)) = \sum\limits_{\gamma} l (\gamla) \skm\limits^{\infty}_{k=1} \varfpsilon_{\gammq} (k) \qwlta_{kl (\gamma)} + \sum\limits_x \varepsiloh_x |1 - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1} \;.$$

Here $\gamma$ runs uver che closed irvitd of $\phi$ whirh are not containcc in a leaf amd $x$ over the nixed pounts. For $a \in {{\mathbb{R}}}, \delta_a$ is the Dirwc distritucion in $a$ and $\kappa_x$ us defited ty tfw aztikn or $T_x \pji^t$ on the $1$-dijensional vwctor space $T_x X / T_c {{\iqthcal F}}$. That actiog ys multiplication by $e^{\kappa_x t}$ for some $\kalpa_x \in {{\mathbb{R}}}$ and all $t$.

The conjecture is nlt known (qxcept for $\dim X = 1$) if $\phi$ has fixed points. It may well favt bj ve amended somewhat in that case. The analytic dyrfocllty in the presekce of fixed pointx pirf in the fact that nh fhis case $\Delta_{{{\matjcal F}}}$ ras ni chance uo be transversally elliptic to rhe ${{\mathbb{R}}}$-abtiob by the flow, so tkat the methuds pf trsnsverse index theory du nof apply dirfctly. In ffe simpler case dhek tve flow is everywhere tranfversal ti ${{\machcal F}}$, Áuvargz López and Kordykkov mdve proved a beautlful dtsengtheninh of the conjecture. Partial resnkts were obtsited by othex methpds in [@Laz], [@DS2]. We now descriye their resuut in a cohvenienv way for ouw
of Schwartz distributions on an open subset ${{\mathbb{R}}}$. For $X, F}}$ and $\phi$ natural of a ${{\mathcal ({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$-valued trace of on the reduced leafwise cohomology ${\bar{H}}^{{\raisebox{0.05cm}{$\scriptscriptstyle F}}} (X)$ such that in ${{\mathcal D}}' ({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$ we have: $$\label{eq:11} \sum\limits^{\dim {{\mathcal (-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)) = \sum\limits_{\gamma} l (\gamma) \sum\limits^{\infty}_{k=1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} \delta_{kl + \varepsilon_x - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1} \;.$$ Here $\gamma$ runs over the closed orbits of $\phi$ which are not in a leaf and $x$ over the fixed For $a \in {{\mathbb{R}}}, is the Dirac distribution in and is defined the of \phi^t$ on the vector space $T_x X / T_x {{\mathcal F}}$. That action is multiplication by $e^{\kappa_x t}$ for some \in {{\mathbb{R}}}$ $t$. The is known for $\dim X if $\phi$ has fixed points. It to be amended somewhat in that case. The difficulty in presence of fixed points lies in fact that in this case $\Delta_{{{\mathcal F}}}$ has chance to be transversally elliptic to the ${{\mathbb{R}}}$-action by the flow, so that the methods index theory do not directly. In the case the is transversal to F}}$, Álvarez López and Kordyukov have proved a beautiful strengthening of conjecture. Partial results were obtained by other methods in [@Laz], now their result in convenient way for our
 of Schwartz distributions on An open subsEt $J$ of ${{\MatHbb{r}}}$.

\[t31\] for $X, {{\MathCal F}}$ and $\phi$ as abOVe thEre exists a natural definItion Of A ${{\MathCAl d}}' ({{\mathBb{R}}}^{>0})$-valuED tRACe oF $\pHi^*$ On tHe REdUced lEafWise cohOmology ${\bar{h}}^{{\raIsEbox{0.05cm}{$\scriptSCrIptstyle \buLleT$}}}_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)$ suCh tHat in ${{\mAtHcaL d}}' ({{\mathBb{R}}}^{>0})$ We havE: $$\label{EQ:11}
\sum\liMits^{\dim {{\maThCAl F}}}_{n=0} (-1)^n {\mAThrm{Tr}}(\pHI^* {\, | \,}{\BaR{H}}^n_{{{\mAthcal F}}} (X)) = \sum\limits_{\GAmMA} l (\gamma) \sum\limiTs^{\inftY}_{k=1} \VArEPSilOn_{\gAmma} (k) \delta_{Kl (\Gamma)} + \SUm\limitS_X \vAREPsiLOn_x |1 - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1} \;.$$

HeRe $\gamma$ runs OVer The cloSeD orBIts of $\pHi$ whiCh ARe nOt contained In a lEaf and $x$ ovEr the fIXed poinTS. For $a \in {{\Mathbb{r}}}, \deLta_A$ is tHE DIrAc dIsTRibUTiOn iN $A$ anD $\kappa_x$ iS dEfIned bY the ACTIOn of $t_x \pHi^t$ oN the $1$-dImensional vecTor SpacE $t_x X / t_x {{\matHcal F}}$. that AcTion iS multiPlicaTiOn by $e^{\kappa_x t}$ for Some $\Kappa_x \in {{\mAthBb{r}}}$ anD aLl $t$.

ThE ConjecTurE is Not knowN (except FOr $\dIm x = 1$) IF $\PhI$ has fixed points. It mAy WELl Have to be AmendeD SoMeWHat in thaT cAse. the aNALytic DiffICuLty in the PresenCE oF fIxed poiNtS lies iN tHe fAct That iN This Case $\DeLta_{{{\mathcAl F}}}$ haS No chance to be trANsversally ellIPtIC To THe ${{\maThbB{R}}}$-action by tHe flOW, so tHat tHE mEthODs of tRansvErSE iNDex theory do not apply DiRectly. in the Simpler case whEn the flow iS EVErywhere TranSVeRSal to ${{\mathcal F}}$, ÁLvareZ López and KORdyukov hAve prOved a beaUtiful strENGthening Of tHe cOnjEctURE. PArtial results WERe obTaIned by oTheR methodS in [@laz], [@dS2]. WE noW dEscribe thEir resulT iN a CoNvEniEnt waY For our
 of Schwartz distributions  on an ope n sub set  $J $of $ {{\m athbb{R}}}$.
\ [t31 \] For $X, {{\mathcalF}}$an d  $\p h i$  as a bove th e re e xis ts  a  na tu r al  defi nit ion ofa ${{\math cal  D }}' ({{\math b b{ R}}}^{>0}) $-v alued traceof$\phi^ *$  on the r edu ced l eafwis e  cohom ology ${\ ba r {H}}^{ { \raiseb o x {0 .05c m}{$\scriptscript s ty l e \bullet$}}}_ {{{\ma th c al F }}}  (X )$ such th at  in $ { {\mathc a lD } } ' ( { {\mathbb{R}}} ^{>0})$ weh ave : $$\l ab el{ e q:11}\sum\ li m its ^{\dim {{\m athc al F}}}_{ n=0} ( - 1)^n {\ m athrm{T r}}(\p hi^ * { \, | \, }{ \ba r{ H }}^ n _{ {{\ m ath cal F}}}  ( X) ) = \ sum\ l i m i ts_{ \ga mma}  l (\ gamma) \sum\l imi ts^{ \ inf ty}_{ k=1}\var ep silon _{\gam ma} ( k)  \delta_{kl (\g amma )} + \sum \li mi ts_ x\vare p silon_ x | 1 -  e^{\ka ppa_x t } |^{ -1 } \ ;. $$

Here $\gamma$ru n s  o ver theclosed or bi t s of $\p hi $ w hich a re no t co n ta ined ina leaf an d$x$ ove rthe fi xe d p oin ts. F o r $a  \in { {\mathbb {R}}} ,  \delta_a$ ist he Dirac dist r ib u t io n  in$a$  and $\kapp a_x$ is d efin e dbyt he ac tionof $T _ x \phi^t$ on the $1 $- dimens ional  vector space  $T_x X /T _ x  {{\math calF }} $ . That actionis mu ltiplicati o n by $e^ {\kap pa_x t}$  for some $ \kappa_x  \i n { {\m ath b b {R }}}$ and all$ t $.
Th e conje ctu re is n otkno wn(ex ce pt for $\ dim X =1$ )if  $ \ph i$ ha s  fixed p oi nts .Itmay w e ll hav e tobe a me nd e d s omewhat in t hatca se . Th e a na lytic  dif f icu lty inthe prese nce of f ix ed  points  lies in thefa ct that in  t his  case$ \ Delta_{{ {\mathcal F}}}$ has noc hance t o b e tra nsve rsally el lip tic to  th e  ${{\m athbb{ R}}}$ -a cti o n  by t h e  f low ,so that th e met hodsof  tra nsverse  index theory do n o t a pply directly . I n th e si mpl e rc ase  w h ent h e flow is every where tran sv e rs al to ${{\ m ath ca l F}}$,  Álvare z Lóp e z and K ordyukovhave prov ed  a b e a uti ful streng theningof the co n jectu r e.  Part ial  resul ts  we re ob tained byother  metho ds  in [@ Laz],  [ @DS2]. W e now describe their re sult i n a c onv enient wa y f o r o ur
 of_Schwartz distributions_on an open subset_$J$ of_${{\mathbb{R}}}$.

\[t31\]_For $X,_{{\mathcal_F}}$ and $\phi$_as above there_exists a natural definition_of a ${{\mathcal_D}}'_({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$-valued trace of $\phi^*$ on the reduced leafwise cohomology ${\bar{H}}^{{\raisebox{0.05cm}{$\scriptscriptstyle \bullet$}}}_{{{\mathcal F}}} (X)$ such_that_in ${{\mathcal_D}}'_({{\mathbb{R}}}^{>0})$_we have: $$\label{eq:11}
\sum\limits^{\dim {{\mathcal F}}}_{n=0}_(-1)^n {\mathrm{Tr}}(\phi^* {\, | \,}{\bar{H}}^n_{{{\mathcal_F}}} (X))_= \sum\limits_{\gamma} l (\gamma) \sum\limits^{\infty}_{k=1} \varepsilon_{\gamma} (k) \delta_{kl_(\gamma)}_+ \sum\limits_x \varepsilon_x_|1 - e^{\kappa_x t}|^{-1} \;.$$

Here $\gamma$ runs over the_closed orbits of $\phi$ which are_not contained in_a_leaf_and $x$ over the_fixed points. For $a \in {{\mathbb{R}}},_\delta_a$ is the Dirac distribution in_$a$ and $\kappa_x$ is defined by the_action of $T_x \phi^t$ on the_$1$-dimensional vector space $T_x X_/ T_x_{{\mathcal F}}$. That action is_multiplication by $e^{\kappa_x_t}$ for_some $\kappa_x \in_{{\mathbb{R}}}$ and all $t$.

The conjecture is_not known (except_for $\dim X = 1$) if_$\phi$_has fixed points._It_may_well have_to be amended_somewhat_in that_case._The analytic difficulty in the presence_of_fixed points lies in the fact that_in this case $\Delta_{{{\mathcal_F}}}$_has no chance to_be transversally elliptic to the_${{\mathbb{R}}}$-action by the flow, so that_the methods_of transverse_index theory do not apply directly. In the simpler case when_the flow is everywhere transversal to_${{\mathcal F}}$, Álvarez López_and Kordyukov_have_proved a beautiful_strengthening_of the_conjecture. Partial results were obtained by other_methods in_[@Laz], [@DS2]. We now describe their_result in a convenient_way_for our