 theoretical analysis. We have found the same phenomena in the ER networks and the SF with other average degrees.

As illustrated in Fig. S\[ae8thre\], the theoretical estimations are sufficient to give fairly precise value of the thresholds. It is apparent that the critical behaviors of the message spreading are completely determined by stickiness ($a$) of message. Moreover, in comparison with the case of ER networks, the analytical solutions are in better agreement with the simulation in SF networks, attributing to shorter shortest paths and hubs [@path1; @bapath; @shortest]. More interestingly, both the analytical boundaries and the numerical thresholds are shifting to left with average degree $\left\langle k\right\rangle$, instead of size of the populations as stressed in [@hub1]. This demonstrates that message can easily reach and infect a larger amount of susceptible individuals through paths from those high-degree vertices whose links increase rapidly with $\left\langle k\right\rangle$, although they can be infected only once.

In Fig. S\[beinfor\], we find that the persistence also boosts its reasonable impact on the spreading as $\left\langle k\right\rangle$ gets larger. It implies that hub nodes of larger size and shorter shortest paths in the networks can transmit the information more efficiently [@path1; @hub1; @shortest]. It is in accordance with the conclusion in [@degree] that higher degrees and densities are relevant factors in improving the global spread of information.

It should be noted that the both ER and SF networks with small average degrees (such as $\langle k \rangle =6, 8$) are tree-like, with few short loops, indicating that the critical transmissibility $T_{C}$ can be derived from equation $T_{c} = \frac{\left\langle k\right\rangle}{\left\langle k^{2}\right\rangle -\left\langle k\right\rangle}$ [@degree; @ther1]. More specifically, $T_{c} = \frac{1}{\left\langle k\right\rangle -1}$ for ER networks. Qualitatively, the contributions of the infection events $E_{n}~(n>\left\langle k\right\rangle-2)$ to the spread are insignificant (see Fig. S\[er6satu\] and Fig. S\[ba6satu\]). Therefore we neglect the contributions of the transmission events $E
theoretical analysis. We have found the same phenomena in the ER net and the SF with early average degrees. 

 As illustrate in Fig.   S\[ae8thre\ ], the theoretical estimate are sufficient to give fairly accurate value of the thresholds. It is apparent that the critical behaviors of the message spreading are wholly determine by stickiness ($ a$) of message. Moreover, in comparison with the character of ER networks, the analytical solution are in better agreement with the simulation in SF networks, attributing to shorter shortest paths and hub   [ @path1; @bapath; @shortest ]. More interestingly, both the analytical boundaries and the numerical thresholds are stir to left with average degree $ \left\langle k\right\rangle$, instead of size of the population as stressed in   [ @hub1 ]. This demonstrates that message can easily reach and infect a larger sum of susceptible individuals through paths from those high - degree vertices whose links increase rapidly with $ \left\langle k\right\rangle$, although they can be infected only once. 

 In Fig.   S\[beinfor\ ], we find that the persistence also boosts its reasonable impact on the spreading as $ \left\langle k\right\rangle$ gets bigger. It implies that hub nodes of big size and short shortest paths in the networks can air the information more efficiently   [ @path1; @hub1; @shortest ]. It is in accordance with the conclusion in   [ @degree ] that higher degree and densities are relevant factors in improving the global spread of information. 

 It should be notice that the both ER and SF networks with small average degrees (such as $ \langle potassium \rangle = 6, 8 $) are tree - like, with few inadequate loops, indicating that the critical transmissibility $ T_{C}$ can be derived from equation   $ T_{c } = \frac{\left\langle k\right\rangle}{\left\langle k^{2}\right\rangle -\left\langle k\right\rangle}$   [ @degree; @ther1 ]. More specifically, $ T_{c } = \frac{1}{\left\langle k\right\rangle -1}$ for ER networks. Qualitatively, the contribution of the infection events $ E_{n}~(n>\left\langle k\right\rangle-2)$ to the spread are insignificant (see Fig.   S\[er6satu\ ] and Fig.   S\[ba6satu\ ]). Therefore we neglect the contributions of the transmission consequence $ E
 thforetical analysis. We haye found the samg phenomxna in fhe ER ndtworks and the SF with othec avwrage degrees.

As illustrated in Fig. S\[av8thre\], the theieetical esvjmations are amfficneit to give fairky precise value of the dhfedholds. It is apparent that the critycal benagiors of the mgssagt s[reaspnn are completely determined by sfickinevs ($a$) of messabe. Moreover, in comparison aith the case of ER nehworks, the qnalrrical solutiuns are in better agregment with the simulation in SF vetwoxks, attribujnbg hm shorter siortesn paths and hmns [@path1; @bapath; @shortest]. More inverewtingly, both the analbtical boundaries anq the numarncal thresholds are syidting to neft qitf abecags degrfe $\meft\langle k\right\rangoe$, instead of size pf nne populatiohs as ftwessed in [@hub1]. This demonstrates that mesvags can easily reach and unfect a larger amounj of susce[tible individuals through paths from those high-dagree xeruigcs wfisf links increase rapidly with $\left\langle k\rigrf\rsnnle$, although then can be infected pnpy jnce.

In Fig. S\[beknfor\], cs rind that the perslstence also boosts ius ressonable impact on the spreqding as $\lefn\lantle k\right\rangle$ gzts larger. Ic imploes tnat hub nodes of larger sizs and shortfr shorteag paths in the ndtwprns can transmit the informwtion morx effnciently [@oath1; @hub1; @srortest]. It is ik accordance with tje couclushon in [@degrfe] that higher degrees and densmvies are relefatt xactors nn impvoving the globwl spread of iuformatijn.

It rhould be hoted tiat the both ER and SF nedaorks with skall avewage degeees (suzf as $\langle k \tangle =6, 8$) cxe tree-lije, with few short kooks, indicating thac uhw critical tramsmkssybplivy $T_{C}$ wan be derivad ffom rquatkon $T_{c} = \frac{\odft\lsngle k\right\rangle}{\lext\lahgle k^{2}\right\rangle -\kent\langle j\right\raggle}$ [@degree; @thrr1]. More specificalpy, $T_{c} = \fcac{1}{\lefy\laggle k\right\rangle -1}$ for ER netwkrks. Qualltabively, the cogtrinutijns of the infection events $E_{n}~(n>\left\langle k\right\rengle-2)$ to the spread arg insignificant (see Fng. X\[er6satu\] and Fig. S\[fa6satu\]). Tharefore we neglect tye contributions pf the transmission ebents $A
theoretical analysis. We have found the same the networks and SF with other Fig. the theoretical estimations sufficient to give precise value of the thresholds. It apparent that the critical behaviors of the message spreading are completely determined by ($a$) of message. Moreover, in comparison with the case of ER networks, the solutions in agreement the simulation in SF networks, attributing to shorter shortest paths and hubs [@path1; @bapath; @shortest]. More both the analytical boundaries and the numerical thresholds shifting to left with degree $\left\langle k\right\rangle$, instead of of populations as in This that message can reach and infect a larger amount of susceptible individuals through paths from those high-degree vertices whose links rapidly with although they be only In Fig. S\[beinfor\], that the persistence also boosts its the spreading as $\left\langle k\right\rangle$ gets larger. It that hub of larger size and shorter shortest in the networks can transmit the information more [@path1; @hub1; @shortest]. It is in accordance with the conclusion in [@degree] that higher degrees are relevant factors in the global spread information. should noted the both and SF networks with small average degrees (such as $\langle k =6, 8$) are tree-like, with few short loops, indicating that transmissibility can be derived equation $T_{c} = \frac{\left\langle k^{2}\right\rangle k\right\rangle}$ [@degree; @ther1]. More = k\right\rangle networks. the of the infection events k\right\rangle-2)$ to the spread are (see Fig. S\[er6satu\] and the contributions of the transmission events $E
 theoretical analysis. We have Found the saMe pheNomEna In The Er netWorks and the SF wITh otHer average degrees.

As illUstraTeD In FiG. s\[aE8thre\], The theoREtICAl eStImAtiOnS ArE suffIciEnt to giVe fairly prEciSe Value of the thREsHolds. It is aPpaRent that the cRitIcal beHaVioRS of thE meSsage SpreadINg are cOmpletely DeTErmineD By stickINEsS ($a$) of Message. Moreover, in COmPArison with the cAse of Er nETwORKs, tHe aNalytical sOlUtionS Are in beTTeR AGReeMEnt with the simUlation in SF NEtwOrks, atTrIbuTIng to sHorteR sHOrtEst paths and Hubs [@Path1; @bapatH; @shortESt]. More iNTerestiNgly, boTh tHe aNalyTIcAl BouNdARieS AnD thE NumErical thReShOlds aRe shIFTINg to LefT witH averAge degree $\left\LanGle k\RIghT\rangLe$, insTead Of Size oF the poPulatIoNs as stressed in [@hUb1]. ThIs demonstRatEs ThaT mEssagE Can easIly ReaCh and inFect a laRGer AmOUNT oF susceptible indiviDuALS tHrough paThs froM ThOsE High-degrEe VerTiceS WHose lInks INcRease rapIdly wiTH $\lEfT\langle K\rIght\raNgLe$, aLthOugh tHEy caN be infEcted onlY once.

iN Fig. S\[beinfor\], we FInd that the perSIsTENcE Also BooSts its reasoNablE ImpaCt on THe SprEAding As $\lefT\lANgLE k\right\rangle$ gets laRgEr. It imPlies That hub nodes oF larger sizE AND shorter ShorTEsT Paths in the netwOrks cAn transmit THe informAtion More effiCiently [@paTH1; @Hub1; @shortEst]. it iS in AccORDaNce with the conCLUsioN iN [@degree] ThaT higher DegReeS anD deNsIties are rElevant fAcToRs In ImpRovinG The globaL sPreAd Of iNformATion.

It ShoulD be nOtEd THat The both er aND sF neTwOrKs wiTh sMaLl aveRage DEgrEes (such As $\langle k \RanGLe =6, 8$) arE tReE-like, wiTh few short looPs, Indicating ThAt tHe critICAl transmIssibility $T_{C}$ can be deriveD From equAtiOn $T_{c} = \fRac{\lEft\langle K\riGht\ranGle}{\LEft\lanGle k^{2}\riGht\raNgLe -\lEFT\langLE K\rIghT\rAngle}$ [@degreE; @THer1]. more sPeCifiCally, $T_{c} = \Frac{1}{\left\langle k\rigHT\raNgle -1}$ for ER netwOrkS. QuaLITaTivELy, THe cOnTRibUTIons of the infectIon events $E_{N}~(n>\LEfT\langle k\riGHt\rAnGle-2)$ to thE spread Are inSIgnificAnt (see Fig. s\[er6satu\] anD FIg. S\[bA6SAtu\]). therefore wE neglect The contriBUtionS Of The trAnsMissioN eVenTs $E
 theoretical analysis. Wehave found  thesam e p he nome na i n the ER netwo r ks a nd the SF with other a verag ed egre e s. 

Asillustr a te d inFi g.  S\ [a e 8t hre\] , t he theo retical es tim at ions are suf f ic ient to gi vefairly preci sevalueof  th e  thre sho lds.It isa pparen t that th ec ritica l  behavi o r sof t he message spread i ng are completely  deter mi n ed b y s tic kiness ($a $)  of m e ssage.M or e o v er, in comparison  with the c a seof ERne two r ks, th e ana ly t ica l solutions  are  in bette r agre e ment wi t h the s imulat ion  in  SFn et wo rks ,a ttr i bu tin g  to  shorter  s ho rtest  pat h s a nd h ubs  [@p ath1;  @bapath; @sh ort est] .  Mo re in teres ting ly , bot h theanaly ti cal boundariesandthe numer ica lthr es holds are sh ift ing  to lef t witha ver ag e d eg ree $\left\langlek\ r i gh t\rangle $, ins t ea do f size o fthe  pop u l ation s as st ressed i n [@hu b 1] .This de mo nstrat es  th atmessa g e ca n easi ly reach  andi nfect a larger amount of sus c ep t i bl e  ind ivi duals throu gh p a thsfrom th ose high- degre ev er t ices whose links in cr ease r apidl y with $\left \langle k\ r i g ht\rangl e$,a lt h ough they canbe in fected onl y  once.
In Fi g. S\[be infor\],w e  find th atthe  pe rsi s t en ce also boost s itsre asonabl e i mpact o n t hespr ead in g as $\le ft\langl ek\ ri gh t\r angle $  gets la rg er.  I t i mplie s  thathub n odes  o fl arg er size an d shor te rshor tes tpaths  int henetwork s can tra nsm i t th ein formati on more effic ie ntly [@pat h1 ; @ hub1;@ s hortest] . It is in accordance w i th thecon clusi on i n [@degre e]that h igh e r degr ees an d den si tie s are r e l ev ant  f actors ini m pro vingth e gl obal sp read of informatio n .
It should benot ed t h a tthe bo t h E Ra ndS F  networks withsmall aver ag e  d egrees (su c h a s$\langl e k \ra ngle= 6, 8$)are tree- like, wit hfews h ort  loops, in dicating  that the criti c al  tran smi ssibil it y $ T_{C} $ canb e d erive d from  e quatio n $T_ {c } = \fra c{\left\langle k\right\ rangle }{\le ft\ langle k^ {2} \ rig ht\rangle  -\l eft\langle  k\ rig ht\ra ngl e }$ [@ degr e e;  @t h er1].  Mor e  specific a ll y,$ T _{ c} = \frac{ 1 } { \le ft\la ngl e  k\rig ht\r angle -1}$ for ER networks. Qual itat i v ely , t h e co nt ributions of t hein f e ction ev en ts $E_{n}~( n>\left\ la n gle k \right \rangl e-2)$ t o th e  sprea d ar e i nsignific ant  ( s ee Fig.  S \[ e r6satu \] a nd  Fig.S\[ba6 s atu\ ] ) . Therefore we n eglec t the c o ntr ibuti on s of th e  tra nsmissionevents $E
 theoretical_analysis. We_have found the same_phenomena in_the_ER networks_and_the SF with_other average degrees.

As_illustrated in Fig. S\[ae8thre\], the_theoretical estimations are_sufficient_to give fairly precise value of the thresholds. It is apparent that the critical_behaviors_of the_message_spreading_are completely determined by stickiness_($a$) of message. Moreover, in_comparison with_the case of ER networks, the analytical solutions_are_in better agreement_with the simulation in SF networks, attributing to shorter_shortest paths and hubs [@path1; @bapath; @shortest]._More interestingly, both_the_analytical_boundaries and the numerical_thresholds are shifting to left with_average degree $\left\langle k\right\rangle$, instead of_size of the populations as stressed in [@hub1]._This demonstrates that message can easily_reach and infect a larger_amount of_susceptible individuals through paths from_those high-degree vertices_whose links_increase rapidly with_$\left\langle k\right\rangle$, although they can be_infected only once.

In_Fig. S\[beinfor\], we find that the persistence_also_boosts its reasonable_impact_on_the spreading_as $\left\langle k\right\rangle$_gets_larger. It_implies_that hub nodes of larger size_and_shorter shortest paths in the networks can_transmit the information more_efficiently [@path1;_@hub1; @shortest]. It is_in accordance with the conclusion_in [@degree] that higher degrees and densities_are relevant_factors in_improving the global spread of information.

It should be noted that the_both ER and SF networks with_small average degrees (such_as $\langle_k_\rangle =6, 8$)_are_tree-like, with_few short loops, indicating that the critical_transmissibility $T_{C}$_can be derived from equation $T_{c} =_\frac{\left\langle k\right\rangle}{\left\langle k^{2}\right\rangle -\left\langle_k\right\rangle}$ [@degree;_@ther1]. More specifically, $T_{c} = \frac{1}{\left\langle_k\right\rangle -1}$ for ER networks. Qualitatively,_the contributions of the infection_events_$E_{n}~(n>\left\langle_k\right\rangle-2)$ to the spread are_insignificant (see Fig. S\[er6satu\] and Fig. S\[ba6satu\]). Therefore_we neglect the_contributions of the transmission events $E