[@Hjorth], characterized by a core radius, $a$, and a cut-off radius $s\gg a$. We can then get the expression of the deviation angle modulus $D_{\theta_{I}}=\parallel\mathbf{\theta_{I}}-\mathbf{\theta_{S}}\parallel$.

For 2 families of multiple images, the relevant quantity becomes the ratio of 2 deviation angles for 2 images $\theta_{I1}$ and $\theta_{I2}$ belonging to 2 different families at redshifts $z_{s1}$ and $z_{s2}$. Let’s define $R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\displaystyle{\frac{D_{\theta_{I1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$. With several families, the problem is highly constrained because a single potential must reproduce the whole set of images. In practice we calculate $\displaystyle{\frac{dR_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}{R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}}$ versus the different parameters it depends on. We chose a typical configuration to get a numerical evaluation of the errors on the cosmological parameters: $z_l=0.3$, $z_{s1}=0.7$, $z_{s2}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{I2}}{\theta_{I1}}}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{s}}{\theta_{a}}}=10$ ($\theta_a=a/D_{OL}$,$\theta_s=s/D_{OL}$) and we assume $\Omega_m=0.3$ and $\Omega_\lambda=0.7$. We then obtain the following orders of magnitudes for the different contributions :

= 0.57 + 0.74 + 0.17 + 0.4( - ) - 0.1 - 0.06 - 0.015 + 0.02

As expected, even with 2 families of multiple images the influence of the cosmological parameters is of the second order. The precise value of the redshifts is quite fundamental, therefore a spectroscopic determination ($dz=0.001$) is essential. The position of the (flux-weighted) centers of the images are also important. With HST observations we assume $d\theta_I=0.1$”.

So even if the problem is less dependent on the core and cut-off radii (in other word the mass profile), they will represent the main sources of error. Taking $d\theta_a/\theta
[ @Hjorth ], characterized by a core radius, $ a$, and a cut - off spoke $ s\gg a$. We can then make the expression of the deviation slant modulus $ D_{\theta_{I}}=\parallel\mathbf{\theta_{I}}-\mathbf{\theta_{S}}\parallel$. 

 For 2 families of multiple image, the relevant quantity becomes the proportion of 2 diversion angles for 2 images $ \theta_{I1}$ and $ \theta_{I2}$ belonging to 2 different families at red shift $ z_{s1}$ and $ z_{s2}$. Let ’s define $ R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\displaystyle{\frac{D_{\theta_{I1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$. With several families, the trouble is highly constrained because a single electric potential must reproduce the solid stage set of images. In practice we calculate $ \displaystyle{\frac{dR_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}{R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}}$ versus the unlike parameters it depends on. We choose a typical shape to get a numeral evaluation of the errors on the cosmological parameters: $ z_l=0.3 $, $ z_{s1}=0.7 $, $ z_{s2}=2 $, $ \displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{I2}}{\theta_{I1}}}=2 $, $ \displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{s}}{\theta_{a}}}=10 $ ($ \theta_a = vitamin a / D_{OL}$,$\theta_s = s / D_{OL}$) and we assume $ \Omega_m=0.3 $ and $ \Omega_\lambda=0.7$. We then obtain the following orders of magnitudes for the unlike contribution: 

 = 0.57 + 0.74 + 0.17 + 0.4 (-) - 0.1 - 0.06 - 0.015 + 0.02 

 As expected, even with 2 families of multiple images the influence of the cosmological parameters is of the second order. The precise value of the redshifts is quite fundamental, consequently a spectroscopic decision ($ dz=0.001 $) is essential. The stead of the (flux - weighted) centers of the images are besides important. With HST observation we assume $ d\theta_I=0.1 $ ”. 

 So even if the trouble is less dependent on the core and cut - off radii (in other word the multitude profile), they will represent the main sources of mistake. Taking $ d\theta_a/\theta
[@Hjogth], characterized by a cure radius, $a$, anb a cut-mff rasius $s\gg a$. We can then get the expredsuon od the deviation angle oodulus $D_{\nheta_{I}}=\parqlleo\nathbf{\thete_{J}}-\mathbf{\bketa_{S}}\lwralnxl$.

For 2 families of multipne images, the seuerant quantity becomes the ratio of 2 qeviatipn angles for 2 iiagex $\thefa_{I1}$ and $\theta_{I2}$ belonging to 2 diffedent fakilies at redxhifts $z_{s1}$ and $z_{s2}$. Let’s defije $R_{\hheta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\displajstyle{\frac{D_{\jgetw_{U1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$. Witf several families, the problem is highly constrained cecauxe a singlg lohgntial must ceprodlce the whole set of hmages. On practice we cancuoate $\displaystyle{\frac{vR_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}{R_{\theta_{Y1},\theta_{I2}}}}$ varaus the different pqramejers ht ddpenas kn. Ws chosf a typical cknfiguratiob to get a numericak qnsluation of fhe erwows on the cosmological parameters: $z_l=0.3$, $z_{s1}=0.7$, $z_{s2}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{I2}}{\rheta_{I1}}}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frwc{\theta_{s}}{\treta_{a}}}=10$ ($\theta_a=a/D_{OL}$,$\theta_s=s/D_{OL}$) and we assume $\Omega_m=0.3$ atd $\Omxgx_\lanbqx=0.7$. Wf then obtain the following orders of magnituqss fpr the differekt contributions :

= 0.57 + 0.74 + 0.17 + 0.4( - ) - 0.1 - 0.06 - 0.015 + 0.02

As expeccsd, even with 2 familifs of moltiplw images uhe imfluence of the cosmologicao parameters us of the second oxder. The preeise vslue pf the redshifts is quice funsamental, thfrefore a rpectroscopic degerkitation ($de=0.001$) is essential. The position of che (flux-deignted) cqnters of hhe images are also impogtant. Whth HST obdervations we assume $d\theta_I=0.1$”.

So xten if the prpbnem is less depekdent on the cowe and cut-off tadii (in jther word the jass prmfile), they rill represend the main sonrces of qrroe. Tajing $d\tfdta_a/\theta
[@Hjorth], characterized by a core radius, $a$, cut-off $s\gg a$. can then get angle $D_{\theta_{I}}=\parallel\mathbf{\theta_{I}}-\mathbf{\theta_{S}}\parallel$. For 2 of multiple images, relevant quantity becomes the ratio of deviation angles for 2 images $\theta_{I1}$ and $\theta_{I2}$ belonging to 2 different families redshifts $z_{s1}$ and $z_{s2}$. Let’s define $R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\displaystyle{\frac{D_{\theta_{I1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$. With several families, the problem is constrained a potential reproduce the whole set of images. In practice we calculate $\displaystyle{\frac{dR_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}{R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}}$ versus the different parameters it on. We chose a typical configuration to get numerical evaluation of the on the cosmological parameters: $z_l=0.3$, $z_{s2}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{s}}{\theta_{a}}}=10$ ($\theta_a=a/D_{OL}$,$\theta_s=s/D_{OL}$) we $\Omega_m=0.3$ $\Omega_\lambda=0.7$. We then the following orders of magnitudes for the different contributions : = 0.57 + 0.74 + 0.17 + - ) - 0.06 0.015 0.02 expected, even with of multiple images the influence of is of the second order. The precise value the redshifts quite fundamental, therefore a spectroscopic determination is essential. The position of the (flux-weighted) centers the images are also important. With HST observations we assume $d\theta_I=0.1$”. So even if the less dependent on the and cut-off radii other the profile), will represent main sources of error. Taking $d\theta_a/\theta
[@Hjorth], characterized by a corE radius, $a$, anD a cut-Off RadIuS $s\gg A$. We cAn then get the exPRessIon of the deviation angle ModulUs $d_{\ThetA_{i}}=\pArallEl\mathbF{\ThETA_{I}}-\mAtHbF{\thEtA_{s}}\pArallEl$.

FOr 2 familIes of multiPle ImAges, the relevANt Quantity beComEs the ratio of 2 DevIation AnGleS For 2 imAgeS $\thetA_{I1}$ and $\tHEta_{I2}$ beLonging to 2 DiFFerent FAmilies AT ReDshiFts $z_{s1}$ and $z_{s2}$. Let’s defINe $r_{\Theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\diSplaysTyLE{\fRAC{D_{\tHetA_{I1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$. WItH seveRAl familIEs, THE ProBLem is highly coNstrained beCAusE a singLe PotENtial mUst rePrODucE the whole seT of iMages. In prActice WE calculATe $\displAystylE{\frAc{dr_{\theTA_{I1},\ThEta_{i2}}}{R_{\THetA_{i1},\tHetA_{i2}}}}$ veRsus the dIfFeRent pAramETERS it dEpeNds oN. We chOse a typical coNfiGuraTIon To get A numeRicaL eValuaTion of The erRoRs on the cosmologIcal ParameterS: $z_l=0.3$, $Z_{s1}=0.7$, $Z_{s2}=2$, $\dIsPlaysTYle{\fraC{\thEta_{i2}}{\theta_{I1}}}=2$, $\DisplaySTylE{\fRAC{\ThEta_{s}}{\theta_{a}}}=10$ ($\theta_a=a/D_{oL}$,$\THEtA_s=s/D_{OL}$) anD we assUMe $\omEGa_m=0.3$ and $\OmEgA_\laMbda=0.7$. wE Then oBtaiN ThE followiNg ordeRS oF mAgnitudEs For the DiFfeRenT contRIbutIons :

= 0.57 + 0.74 + 0.17 + 0.4( - ) - 0.1 - 0.06 - 0.015 + 0.02

As Expected, Even wITh 2 families of muLTiple images thE InFLUeNCe of The CosmologicaL parAMeteRs is OF tHe sECond oRder. THe PReCIse value of the redshiFtS is quiTe funDamental, thereFore a spectROSCopic detErmiNAtIOn ($dz=0.001$) is essentiaL. The pOsition of tHE (flux-weiGhted) Centers oF the imageS ARe also imPorTanT. WiTh Hst ObServations we aSSUme $d\ThEta_I=0.1$”.

So eVen If the prOblEm iS leSs dEpEndent on tHe core anD cUt-OfF rAdiI (in otHEr word thE mAss PrOfiLe), theY Will rePreseNt thE mAiN SouRces of eRRoR. tAkinG $d\ThEta_a/\TheTa
[@Hjorth], characterized b y a core r adius , $ a$,  a nd a  cut -off radius $s \ gg a $. We can then get the  expr es s iono fthe d eviatio n  a n g lemo du lus  $ D _{ \thet a_{ I}}=\pa rallel\mat hbf {\ theta_{I}}-\ m at hbf{\theta _{S }}\parallel$ .
For 2fa mil i es of  mu ltipl e imag e s, the  relevant  q u antity becomes t he  rat io of 2 deviation an g les for 2 imag es $\t he t a_ { I 1}$  an d $\theta_ {I 2}$ b e longing to 2 dif f erent familie s at redshi f ts$z_{s1 }$  an d  $z_{s 2}$.Le t ’sdefine $R_{ \the ta_{I1},\ theta_ { I2}}=\d i splayst yle{\f rac {D_ {\th e ta _{ I1} }} { D_{ \ th eta _ {I2 }}}}$. W it hsever al f a m i l ies,  th e pr oblem  is highly co nst rain e d b ecaus e a s ingl epoten tial m ust r ep roduce the whol e se t of imag es.  I n p ra ctice we cal cul ate  $\disp laystyl e {\f ra c { d R_ {\theta_{I1},\thet a_ { I 2} }}{R_{\t heta_{ I 1} ,\ t heta_{I2 }} }}$  ver s u s the  dif f er ent para meters it  d ependson . We c ho sea t ypica l  con figura tion toget a numerical eval u ation of thee rr o r so n th e c osmological  par a mete rs:$ z_ l=0 . 3$, $ z_{s1 }= 0 .7 $ , $z_{s2}=2$, $\dis pl aystyl e{\fr ac{\theta_{I2 }}{\theta_ { I 1 }}}=2$,$\di s pl a ystyle{\frac{\ theta _{s}}{\the t a_{a}}}= 10$ ( $\theta_ a=a/D_{OL } $ ,$\theta _s= s/D _{O L}$ ) an d we assume $ \ O mega _m =0.3$ a nd$\Omega _\l amb da= 0.7 $.  We thenobtain t he  f ol lo win g ord e rs of ma gn itu de s f or th e  diffe rentcont ri bu t ion s :

=0 .5 7 + 0. 74  +  0.1 7 +  0 .4( -  ) - 0.1  - 0.06  - 0.015+ 0 . 02
As  e xpected , even with 2  f amilies of  m ult iple i m a ges theinfluence of the cosmol o gical p ara meter s is  of the s eco nd ord er. The pr ecisevalue  o f t h e  reds h i ft s i squite fund a m ent al, t he refo re a sp ectroscopic determ i nat ion ($dz=0.00 1$)  ise s se nti a l. The  p o sit i o n of the (flux- weighted)ce n te rs of thei mag es  are al so impo rtant .  With H ST observ ations we  a ssum e $d\ theta_I=0. 1$”.

So  even ift he pr o bl em is  le ss dep en den t onthe co r e a nd cu t-offra dii (i n oth er  word th e mass profile), they w ill re prese ntthe mainsou r ces  of error . Ta king $d\th eta _a/ \thet a
[@Hjorth], characterized_by a_core radius, $a$, and_a cut-off_radius_$s\gg a$._We_can then get_the expression of_the deviation angle modulus_$D_{\theta_{I}}=\parallel\mathbf{\theta_{I}}-\mathbf{\theta_{S}}\parallel$.

For 2 families_of_multiple images, the relevant quantity becomes the ratio of 2 deviation angles for 2_images_$\theta_{I1}$ and_$\theta_{I2}$_belonging_to 2 different families at_redshifts $z_{s1}$ and $z_{s2}$. Let’s_define $R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}=\displaystyle{\frac{D_{\theta_{I1}}}{D_{\theta_{I2}}}}$._With several families, the problem is highly constrained_because_a single potential_must reproduce the whole set of images. In practice_we calculate $\displaystyle{\frac{dR_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}{R_{\theta_{I1},\theta_{I2}}}}$ versus the different_parameters it depends_on._We_chose a typical configuration_to get a numerical evaluation of_the errors on the cosmological parameters:_$z_l=0.3$, $z_{s1}=0.7$, $z_{s2}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{I2}}{\theta_{I1}}}=2$, $\displaystyle{\frac{\theta_{s}}{\theta_{a}}}=10$ ($\theta_a=a/D_{OL}$,$\theta_s=s/D_{OL}$) and_we assume $\Omega_m=0.3$ and $\Omega_\lambda=0.7$. We_then obtain the following orders_of magnitudes_for the different contributions :

=_0.57 + 0.74_+ 0.17_+ 0.4( -_) - 0.1 - 0.06 -_0.015 + 0.02

As_expected, even with 2 families of_multiple_images the influence_of_the_cosmological parameters_is of the_second_order. The_precise_value of the redshifts is quite_fundamental,_therefore a spectroscopic determination ($dz=0.001$) is essential._The position of the_(flux-weighted)_centers of the images_are also important. With HST_observations we assume $d\theta_I=0.1$”.

So even if_the problem_is less_dependent on the core and cut-off radii (in other word the_mass profile), they will represent the_main sources of error._Taking $d\theta_a/\theta