p^*\simeq100$ implies that the dominant scattering from impurities is due to remote instead of background impurities.[@macleod] If we consider that $1/\tau_p^*=1/\tau+1/\tau_{ee}$, we get a time scale of $\tau_{ee}=\tau_p^*$ which demonstrates that electron-electron collisions dominate the microscopic scattering mechanisms as expected.[@leyland]

Additionally, a further increase of the magnetic field leads to a strong decay due to the spread of the g-factor within the measured ensemble.[@greilichprl2006; @zhukov2007] The size of the inhomogeneity $\Delta g$ can be inferred by fitting the data according to $1/T_{2}^{*}(B)=1/T_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta g\mu_BB/\sqrt{2}\hbar$ as shown in Fig. 1(d). From the 1/B dependence,[@22; @28] we obtain $\Delta g=0.002$ or 0.44% and $T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2 ns.

The optical power influence on the spin dynamics for the DQW sample is shown in Fig. 2(a) at 1 T. Only at low pump power, we observed negative delay oscillations of considerably large amplitude. To find electron spin polarization before the pump pulse arrival indicates that the spin polarization persists from the previous pump pulse, which took place $t_{rep}=13.2$ ns before. The excitation power dependence of T$_{2}^{*}$ was plotted in Fig. 2(b) yielding an exponential decay. For single QW structures, the decrease of the coherence time at high pump density was associated with the electrons delocalization caused by their heating due to the interaction with the photogenerated carriers.[@zhukov2007] A similar decrease was also attributed to an increased efficiency of the Bir-Aronov-Pikus mechanism induced by the larger hole photogenerated density in GaAs QWs.[@37] However, it is unlikely to be relevant in our dense 2DEG where the photogenerated hole loses its spin and energy quickly and fast recombines with an electron from the 2DEG. Nevertheless, being a key parameter for spin devices, we note that T$_{2}^{*}$ remains near the nanoseconds range when the power is raised by almost one order of magnitude. At higher excitation power, an additional short-lived component in the signal becomes more significant. In systems where T$_{2}^{*
p^*\simeq100 $ implies that the dominant scattering from impurities is ascribable to remote control rather of background impurities.[@macleod ] If we think that $ 1/\tau_p^*=1/\tau+1/\tau_{ee}$, we receive a time scale of $ \tau_{ee}=\tau_p^*$ which demonstrate that electron - electron collision dominate the microscopic scattering mechanisms as expected.[@leyland ] 

 Additionally, a further increase of the charismatic field leads to a strong decay due to the spread of the gravitational constant - factor within the measured ensemble.[@greilichprl2006; @zhukov2007 ] The size of the inhomogeneity $ \Delta g$ can be inferred by fitting the data harmonize to $ 1 / T_{2}^{*}(B)=1 / T_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta g\mu_BB/\sqrt{2}\hbar$ as shown in Fig. 1(d). From the 1 / B dependence,[@22; @28 ] we obtain $ \Delta g=0.002 $ or 0.44% and $ T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2 normality. 

 The optical power influence on the spin dynamics for the DQW sample distribution is shown in Fig. 2(a) at 1 T. entirely at low pump power, we note negative delay oscillations of considerably large amplitude. To find electron tailspin polarization before the heart pulsation arrival indicates that the spin polarization persists from the previous pump pulse, which took plaza $ t_{rep}=13.2 $ nitrogen before. The excitation exponent addiction of T$_{2}^{*}$ was plotted in Fig. 2(b) yielding an exponential decay. For single QW structures, the decrease of the coherence time at high pump density was consociate with the electrons delocalization caused by their heating due to the interaction with the photogenerated carriers.[@zhukov2007 ] A similar decrease was also attributed to an increase efficiency of the Bir - Aronov - Pikus mechanism induced by the larger hole photogenerated density in GaAs QWs.[@37 ] However, it is improbable to be relevant in our dense 2DEG where the photogenerated hole lose its tailspin and energy quickly and fast recombines with an electron from the 2DEG. Nevertheless, being a key parameter for spin devices, we notice that T$_{2}^{*}$ remains near the nanosecond range when the power is raised by almost one order of order of magnitude. At higher excitation power, an additional short - populate component in the signal become more significant. In system where T$_{2}^ { *
p^*\sileq100$ implies that the domlnant scattering from ikpuritjes is dje to remote instead of backjroubd imklrities.[@macleod] If we zonsider nhat $1/\tau_p^*=1/\rau+1/\teu_{ee}$, we get a time scale of $\tah_{ce}=\tau_'^*$ xhich demonstrajes that elewtron-electron woulnsions dominate the microscopic scateering kefhanisms as exkectec.[@jeylznd]

Additionally, a further increase of the magnetic fiekd leads to a strong decay due to the spread of hhe g-factor witrun the measufed ensemble.[@greilichprm2006; @zhukov2007] The size of the inhomoeeneicy $\Delta g$ xab bf inferred bb fittpng the data accordinc to $1/T_{2}^{*}(B)=1/Y_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta g\mu_BB/\sqvt{2}\hbac$ as shown in Fig. 1(d). From vhe 1/B dependence,[@22; @28] we obtain $\Dalca g=0.002$ or 0.44% and $T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2 ns.

The optican pofer kbfljende oh the dpii dynamics ror the DQW sample is shown in Fyt. 2(a) at 1 T. Onlg at ljw pump power, we observed negative delay mscjllations of consideraboy large amplitude. To find elestron spin polarization before the pump pulse arrhval mnaiccbcs tfqt the spin polarization persists from the prevykux iump pulse, which book place $t_{rep}=13.2$ ns bffpte. The excitatkon pocsr dependence of T$_{2}^{*}$ wws plotjed in Fig. 2(b) yitldinb an exponential decay. For wingle QW stguctyres, the decrease lf the cohexence jime ay high pump density was asskciated witj the eledgrons delocalizagiok cdused by their heating due to the iiteraetion wigh tne phoeogeneratef carvhers.[@zhukov2007] A similwr deereasa was also attributed to an increased effmriency of the Bhr-Agonov-Pikuf mecmanism induced fy the larger kole phocogenefated denspty in GaEs QWs.[@37] Howevqr, it is unlingly to be relxvant in jur eensw 2DEG wfdre the photogrnerated kjle ooses its spin and engrfy quickly and ycsu eecombines witn av ejebtrpn xrom the 2DEG. Nevdrtfrless, being a ken pxramrter for spin devicev, we note that T$_{2}^{*}$ remaims near thg nanosecjnds range whrn the power is ralsed uy almust ome jrder of magnitude. At higher escitation porer, an addityonao short-lived component in the signal becomes more smgnificant. In systems wyere T$_{2}^{*
p^*\simeq100$ implies that the dominant scattering from due remote instead background impurities.[@macleod] If get time scale of which demonstrates that collisions dominate the microscopic scattering mechanisms expected.[@leyland] Additionally, a further increase of the magnetic field leads to a strong due to the spread of the g-factor within the measured ensemble.[@greilichprl2006; @zhukov2007] The of inhomogeneity g$ be inferred by fitting the data according to $1/T_{2}^{*}(B)=1/T_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta g\mu_BB/\sqrt{2}\hbar$ as shown in Fig. 1(d). From 1/B dependence,[@22; @28] we obtain $\Delta g=0.002$ or and $T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2 ns. optical power influence on the dynamics the DQW is in 2(a) at 1 Only at low pump power, we observed negative delay oscillations of considerably large amplitude. To find electron polarization before pulse arrival that spin persists from the pulse, which took place $t_{rep}=13.2$ ns power dependence of T$_{2}^{*}$ was plotted in Fig. yielding an decay. For single QW structures, the of the coherence time at high pump density associated with the electrons delocalization caused by their heating due to the interaction with the A similar decrease was attributed to an efficiency the mechanism by the hole photogenerated density in GaAs QWs.[@37] However, it is unlikely to relevant in our dense 2DEG where the photogenerated hole loses and quickly and fast with an electron from 2DEG. being a key parameter devices, note near nanoseconds when the power is by almost one order of At higher excitation power, the signal becomes more significant. In systems where
p^*\simeq100$ implies that the dominAnt scatterIng frOm iMpuRiTies Is duE to remote insteAD of bAckground impurities.[@macLeod] IF wE ConsIDeR that $1/\Tau_p^*=1/\tau+1/\TAu_{EE}$, We gEt A tIme ScALe Of $\tau_{Ee}=\tAu_p^*$ whicH demonstraTes ThAt electron-elECtRon collisiOns Dominate the mIcrOscopiC sCatTEring MecHanisMs as exPEcted.[@lEyland]

AddItIOnally, A Further INCrEase Of the magnetic fielD LeADs to a strong decAy due tO tHE sPREad Of tHe g-factor wItHin thE MeasureD EnSEMBle.[@GReilichprl2006; @zhuKov2007] The size oF The InhomoGeNeiTY $\Delta G$ can bE iNFerRed by fittinG the Data accorDing to $1/t_{2}^{*}(b)=1/T_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta G\Mu_BB/\sqrT{2}\hbar$ aS shOwn In FiG. 1(D). FRoM thE 1/B DEpeNDeNce,[@22; @28] WE obTain $\DeltA g=0.002$ Or 0.44% And $T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2 nS.

The OPTICal pOweR infLuencE on the spin dynAmiCs foR The dQW saMple iS shoWn In Fig. 2(A) at 1 T. OnLy at lOw Pump power, we obseRved Negative dElaY oSciLlAtionS Of consIdeRabLy large AmplituDE. To FiND ELeCtron spin polarizatIoN BEfOre the puMp pulsE ArRiVAl indicaTeS thAt thE SPin poLariZAtIon persiSts froM ThE pRevious PuMp pulsE, wHicH toOk plaCE $t_{reP}=13.2$ ns befOre. The exCitatIOn power dependeNCe of T$_{2}^{*}$ was plottED iN fIg. 2(B) YielDinG an exponentIal dECay. FOr siNGlE QW STructUres, tHe DEcREase of the coherence tImE at higH pump Density was assOciated witH THE electroNs deLOcALization caused By theIr heating dUE to the inTeracTion with The photogENErated caRriErs.[@ZhuKov2007] a SImIlar decrease wAS Also AtTributeD to An increAseD efFicIenCy Of the Bir-ARonov-PikUs MeChAnIsm InducED by the laRgEr hOlE phOtogeNErated DensiTy in gaas qws.[@37] HOwever, iT Is UNLikeLy To Be reLevAnT in ouR denSE 2DEg where tHe photogeNerATed hOlE lOses its Spin and energy QuIckly and faSt RecOmbineS WIth an eleCtron from the 2DEG. NevertheLEss, beinG a kEy parAmetEr for spin DevIces, we NotE That T$_{2}^{*}$ rEmains Near tHe NanOSEcondS RAnGe wHeN the power iS RAisEd by aLmOst oNe order Of magnitude. At higheR ExcItation power, aN adDitiONAl ShoRT-lIVed CoMPonENT in the signal becOmes more siGnIFiCant. In systEMs wHeRe T$_{2}^{*
p^*\simeq100$ implies that  the domin ant s cat ter in g fr om i mpurities is d u e to  remote instead of bac kgrou nd impu r it ies.[ @macleo d ]I f  we  c on sid er th at $1 /\t au_p^*= 1/\tau+1/\ tau _{ ee}$, we get atime scale  of  $\tau_{ee}= \ta u_p^*$  w hic h  demo nst rates  thate lectro n-electro nc ollisi o ns domi n a te  the  microscopic scat t er i ng mechanismsas exp ec t ed . [ @le yla nd]

Addit io nally ,  a furt h er i n cre a se of the mag netic field lea ds toastr o ng dec ay du et o t he spread o f th e g-facto r with i n the m e asuredensemb le. [@g reil i ch pr l20 06 ;  @z h uk ov2 0 07]  The siz eof  theinho m o g e neit y $ \Del ta g$  can be infer red  byf itt ing t he da ta a cc ordin g to $ 1/T_{ 2} ^{*}(B)=1/T_{2} ^{*} (0)+\Delt a g \m u_B B/ \sqrt { 2}\hba r$asshown i n Fig.1 (d) .F r o mthe 1/B dependence ,[ @ 2 2;  @28] we  obtai n  $ \D e lta g=0. 00 2$or 0 . 4 4% an d $T _ {2 }^{*}(0) =$ 2 n s .
T he opti ca l powe rinf lue nce o n  the  spindynamics  fort he DQW samplei s shown in Fi g .2 ( a) at 1  T.  Only at lo w pu m p po wer, we  ob s erved  nega ti v ed elay oscillations o fconsid erabl y large ampli tude. To f i n d  electro n sp i np olarization be forethe pump p u lse arri val i ndicates  that the s pin pola riz ati onper s i st s from the pr e v ious  p ump pul se,  whichtoo k p lac e $ t_ {rep}=13. 2$ ns be fo re .Th e e xcita t ion powe rdep en den ce of T$_{2} ^{*}$  was  p lo t ted  in Fig .  2 ( b ) yi el di ng a n e xp onent iald eca y. Forsingle QW  st r uctu re s,  the de crease of the  c oherence t im e a t high p ump dens ity was associated with the ele ctr ons d eloc alization  ca used b y t h eir he atingdue t othe i ntera c t io n w it h the phot o g ene rated  c arri ers.[@z hukov2007] A simil a r d ecrease was a lso  att r i bu ted to anin c rea s e d efficiency of  the Bir-A ro n ov -Pikus mec h ani sm  induce d by th e lar g er hole  photogen erated de ns ityi n  Ga As QWs.[@3 7] Howev er, it is unlik e ly  to b e r elevan tinour d ense 2 D EGwhere  the p ho togene rated  h ole lose s its spin and energy q uickly  andfas t recombi nes wit h an elec tron  from the2DE G.Never the l ess,bein g  a  ke y  para mete r  for spin de vic e s ,we note tha t T $_{ 2}^{* }$r emains  nea r the nanoseconds range when the  pow e r  is  ra i sedby  almost one or der  o f magnitud e.  At higherexcitati on power , an a dditio nal sho r t -l i ved co mpon ent  in the s ign al becomes  m or e  signi fica nt . In s ystems wher e T$_{2}^{*
p^*\simeq100$ implies_that the_dominant scattering from impurities_is due_to_remote instead_of_background impurities.[@macleod] If_we consider that_$1/\tau_p^*=1/\tau+1/\tau_{ee}$, we get a_time scale of_$\tau_{ee}=\tau_p^*$_which demonstrates that electron-electron collisions dominate the microscopic scattering mechanisms as expected.[@leyland]

Additionally, a further_increase_of the_magnetic_field_leads to a strong decay_due to the spread of_the g-factor_within the measured ensemble.[@greilichprl2006; @zhukov2007] The size of_the_inhomogeneity $\Delta g$_can be inferred by fitting the data according to_$1/T_{2}^{*}(B)=1/T_{2}^{*}(0)+\Delta g\mu_BB/\sqrt{2}\hbar$ as shown in Fig._1(d). From the_1/B_dependence,[@22;_@28] we obtain $\Delta_g=0.002$ or 0.44% and $T_{2}^{*}(0)=$ 2_ns.

The optical power influence on the_spin dynamics for the DQW sample is_shown in Fig. 2(a) at 1_T. Only at low pump_power, we_observed negative delay oscillations of_considerably large amplitude._To find_electron spin polarization_before the pump pulse arrival indicates_that the spin_polarization persists from the previous pump_pulse,_which took place_$t_{rep}=13.2$_ns_before. The_excitation power dependence_of_T$_{2}^{*}$ was_plotted_in Fig. 2(b) yielding an exponential_decay._For single QW structures, the decrease of_the coherence time at_high_pump density was associated_with the electrons delocalization caused_by their heating due to the_interaction with_the photogenerated_carriers.[@zhukov2007] A similar decrease was also attributed to an increased efficiency_of the Bir-Aronov-Pikus mechanism induced by_the larger hole photogenerated_density in_GaAs_QWs.[@37] However, it_is_unlikely to_be relevant in our dense 2DEG where_the photogenerated_hole loses its spin and energy_quickly and fast recombines_with_an electron from the 2DEG. Nevertheless,_being a key parameter for spin_devices, we note that T$_{2}^{*}$_remains_near_the nanoseconds range when the_power is raised by almost one_order of magnitude._At higher excitation power, an additional short-lived_component_in the signal becomes more significant._In_systems where T$_{2}^{*