4\]. We see, strikingly, that for slabs with different number of $N$ (i.e., width $W$) the structures of $%
W_\tau(x)$ are in excellent agreement with $W_\tau(x)$ described by Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) and (\[eq:11\]).

Resonance structure {#sec:resonance_structure}
===================

In the previous section, we have seen that in both $2$D slabs and quasi-$1$D waveguides the ensemble averaged eigenchannel structure $W_\tau(x)$ is described by the universal formula Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) and ([eq:11]{}). It is natural to ask whether this universality can be extended to strictly $1$D systems, in which the transmission eigenchannel does not exist. Noting that the resonant transmissions have the same bimodal statistics as the transmission eigenvalues of eigenchannels [@Bliokh15], in this section we study numerically the resonance structure ${\tilde I}_{\mathcal{T}%
_n}(x)$. It is well known [Berezinskii73]{} that in strictly $1$D, there is no diffusive regime, because the localization length is $\sim\ell$. Instead, there are only ballistic and localized regimes. We consider the former below.

In simulations, the sample consists of $51$ scatterers separated by $50$ layers, whose thicknesses (rescaled by the inverse wave number in the background) are randomly distributed in the interval $d_0 \pm \delta$, with $%
d_0 = 10.0$ and $\delta = 9.0$. Thus $L=50 d_0$. The scatterers are characterized by the reflection coefficients $r_i$ between the neighbouring layers ($i$ labels the scatterers.), which are chosen randomly and independently from the interval of $(-s,s)$, with $s\in (0,1)$ governing the disorder strength. We change the frequency $\Omega$ in a narrow band centered at $\Omega_0$ and of half-width $%
5\%\times \Omega_0$, and calculate the transmittance spectrum $\mathcal{T}%
(\Omega)$ by using the standard transfer matrix approach. We also change disorder configurations, so that for each resonant transmission $\mathcal{T}%
_n$, $5\times 10^5$
4\ ]. We see, strikingly, that for slabs with different number of $ N$ (i.e., width $ W$) the structure of $% 
 W_\tau(x)$ are in excellent agreement with $ W_\tau(x)$ trace by Eqs.   (\[eq:9\ ]), (\[eq:10\ ]) and (\[eq:11\ ]). 

 Resonance structure { # sec: resonance_structure } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In the previous section, we have understand that in both $ 2$D slabs and quasi-$1$D waveguides the ensemble averaged eigenchannel social organization $ W_\tau(x)$ is described by the universal formula Eqs.   (\[eq:9\ ]), (\[eq:10\ ]) and ([ eq:11 ] { }). It is lifelike to necessitate whether this universality can be extended to strictly $ 1$D system, in which the transmission eigenchannel does not exist. Noting that the resonant transmissions have the same bimodal statistic as the transmission eigenvalues of eigenchannels [ @Bliokh15 ], in this section we learn numerically the resonance structure $ { \tilde I}_{\mathcal{T}% 
 _ n}(x)$. It is well known [ Berezinskii73 ] { } that in rigorously $ 1$D, there is no diffusing regime, because the localization length is $ \sim\ell$. Instead, there are only ballistic and localize regimes. We consider the former below. 

 In simulations, the sample consists of $ 51 $ scatterers separated by $ 50 $ layers, whose thicknesses (rescaled by the inverse wave number in the background) are randomly distributed in the interval $ d_0 \pm \delta$, with $% 
 d_0 = 10.0 $ and $ \delta = 9.0$. Thus $ L=50 d_0$. The scatterers are characterized by the contemplation coefficients $ r_i$ between the neighbouring layers ($ i$ pronounce the scatterers .), which are choose randomly and independently from the interval of $ (-s, s)$, with $ s\in (0,1)$ governing the disorder strength. We change the frequency $ \Omega$ in a narrow band center at $ \Omega_0 $ and of half - width $% 
 5\%\times \Omega_0 $, and calculate the transmittance spectrum $ \mathcal{T}% 
 (\Omega)$ by using the standard transfer matrix approach. We also change disorderliness configurations, so that for each resonant transmission $ \mathcal{T}% 
 _ n$, $ 5\times 10 ^ 5 $
4\]. We see, strikingly, that for slabs with difywrent iumber kf $N$ (i.e., didth $W$) the structures of $%
W_\teu(x)$ qre ib excellent agreement dith $W_\tau(q)$ describwd bb Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) and (\[eq:11\]).

Resonangz strhgture {#wec:resonance_sttucture}
===================

In tha previous secdiun, we have seen that in both $2$D slabs wnd quaxi-$1$F waveguides tre emfembmv cveraged eigenchannel structure $W_\tau(x)$ ps described by tne universal formula Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) wnd ([eq:11]{}). It is naturwl to ask wyethqe this univefsality can be extendes to strictly $1$D systems, in whicf the transmissuob elcenchannel voes njt exist. Notlmg thad the rrsonant transmlssiois hqve the same bimodal vtatistics as the jransmissimn eigenvalues of eugwnchatnelv [@Blkikh15], in tiis sectiln xe study nujerically tye resonance structirq ${\tilde I}_{\mathczl{T}%
_n}(x)$. Yt is well known [Berezinskii73]{} that in stribtly $1$D, there is no diffusivw regime, because the pocalizatyon length is $\sim\ell$. Instead, there are only ballivtic ena licwuuzfd regimes. We consider the former below.

In simtmauioks, the sample coksists of $51$ scatterrrd xgparated by $50$ lxyers, cgoae thicknesses (resfaled bi the unverse wwve mumber in the background) arw randomly dpstrubuted in the intexval $d_0 \pm \deuta$, eith $%
c_0 = 10.0$ and $\delta = 9.0$. Thus $L=50 b_0$. The acatterers wre charadgerized by the rdflvctimn coefficients $r_i$ between the neigibournng layefs ($i$ labelf the scatherers.), which are chosen gandollf and indeoendently from the interval of $(-s,s)$, with $s\in (0,1)$ gpvarnpng the dnsordev strength. We crange the freqoency $\Omeya$ in x narrow bznd cenvered at $\Omeda_0$ and of halx-aidth $%
5\%\times \Mmega_0$, anq caoculqte the gransmittance xpectrum $\mathcal{T}%
(\Omwga)$ by using the sbandatd transfer matrir qpproach. We alsp cfande dmsordqs configurathons, so yhat wor each rewunany transmission $\mathcdl{T}%
_n$, $5\times 10^5$
4\]. We see, strikingly, that for slabs number $N$ (i.e., $W$) the structures excellent with $W_\tau(x)$ described Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) (\[eq:11\]). Resonance structure {#sec:resonance_structure} =================== In previous section, we have seen that in both $2$D slabs and quasi-$1$D waveguides ensemble averaged eigenchannel structure $W_\tau(x)$ is described by the universal formula Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), and It natural ask whether this universality can be extended to strictly $1$D systems, in which the transmission eigenchannel not exist. Noting that the resonant transmissions have same bimodal statistics as transmission eigenvalues of eigenchannels [@Bliokh15], this we study the structure I}_{\mathcal{T}% _n}(x)$. It well known [Berezinskii73]{} that in strictly $1$D, there is no diffusive regime, because the localization length is Instead, there ballistic and regimes. consider former below. In sample consists of $51$ scatterers separated whose thicknesses (rescaled by the inverse wave number the background) randomly distributed in the interval $d_0 \delta$, with $% d_0 = 10.0$ and $\delta 9.0$. Thus $L=50 d_0$. The scatterers are characterized by the reflection coefficients $r_i$ between the ($i$ labels the scatterers.), are chosen randomly independently the of with $s\in governing the disorder strength. We change the frequency $\Omega$ in a band centered at $\Omega_0$ and of half-width $% 5\%\times \Omega_0$, the spectrum $\mathcal{T}% (\Omega)$ using the standard transfer approach. also change disorder configurations, for resonant $5\times
4\]. We see, strikingly, that for slaBs with diffErent NumBer Of $n$ (i.e., wIdth $w$) the structures OF $%
W_\taU(x)$ are in excellent agreemEnt wiTh $w_\Tau(x)$ DEsCribeD by Eqs. (\[eQ:9\]), (\[Eq:10\]) AND (\[eq:11\]).

reSoNanCe STrUcturE {#seC:resonaNce_structuRe}
===================

IN tHe previous seCTiOn, we have seEn tHat in both $2$D slAbs And quaSi-$1$d waVEguidEs tHe ensEmble aVEraged EigenchanNeL StructURe $W_\tau(x)$ IS DeScriBed by the universal FOrMUla Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) and ([eQ:11]{}). It is nAtURaL TO asK whEther this uNiVersaLIty can bE ExTENDed TO strictly $1$D sysTems, in which THe tRansmiSsIon EIgenchAnnel DoES noT exist. NotinG thaT the resonAnt traNSmissioNS have thE same bImoDal StatIStIcS as ThE TraNSmIssIOn eIgenvaluEs Of EigenChanNELS [@blioKh15], iN thiS sectIon we study numEriCallY The ResonAnce sTrucTuRe ${\tilDe I}_{\matHcal{T}%
_N}(x)$. it is well known [BeReziNskii73]{} that In sTrIctLy $1$d, therE Is no diFfuSivE regime, Because THe lOcALIZaTion length is $\sim\ell$. inSTEaD, there arE only bALlIsTIc and locAlIzeD regIMEs. We cOnsiDEr The formeR below.

iN sImUlationS, tHe sampLe ConSisTs of $51$ sCAtteRers seParated bY $50$ layeRS, whose thicknesSEs (rescaled by tHE iNVErSE wavE nuMber in the baCkgrOUnd) aRe raNDoMly DIstriButed In THe INterval $d_0 \pm \delta$, with $%
D_0 = 10.0$ aNd $\deltA = 9.0$. Thus $l=50 d_0$. The scattereRs are charaCTERized by tHe reFLeCTion coefficienTs $r_i$ bEtween the nEIghbouriNg layErs ($i$ labeLs the scatTERers.), whicH arE chOseN raNDOmLy and independENTly fRoM the intErvAl of $(-s,s)$, wIth $S\in (0,1)$ GovErnInG the disorDer strenGtH. WE cHaNge The frEQuency $\OmEgA$ in A nArrOw banD CenterEd at $\OMega_0$ AnD oF HalF-width $%
5\%\tIMeS \oMega_0$, AnD cAlcuLatE tHe traNsmiTTanCe spectRum $\mathcaL{T}%
(\OMEga)$ bY uSiNg the stAndard transfeR mAtrix approAcH. We Also chANGe disordEr configurations, so that fOR each reSonAnt trAnsmIssion $\matHcaL{T}%
_n$, $5\timEs 10^5$
4\]. We see, strikingly, t hat for sl abs w ith  di ff eren t nu mber of $N$ (i . e.,width $W$) the structu res o f$ %
W_ \ ta u(x)$  are in ex c e lle nt  a gre em e nt  with  $W _\tau(x )$ describ edby  Eqs. (\[eq: 9 \] ), (\[eq:1 0\] ) and (\[eq: 11\ ]).

R es ona n ce st ruc ture{#sec: r esonan ce_struct ur e }
==== = ======= = = == ===
In the previouss ec t ion, we have s een th at in b oth  $2 $D slabs a nd  quas i -$1$D w a ve g u i des the ensembleaveraged ei g enc hannel  s tru c ture $ W_\ta u( x )$is describe d by  the univ ersalf ormulaE qs. (\[ eq:9\] ),(\[ eq:1 0 \] )and  ( [ eq: 1 1] {}) .  It  is natu ra lto as k wh e t h e r th isuniv ersal ity can be ex ten dedt o s trict ly $1 $D s ys tems,  in wh ich t he  transmission e igen channel d oes  n otex ist.N otingtha t t he reso nant tr a nsm is s i o ns  have the same bim od a l  s tatistic s as t h etr a nsmissio neig enva l u es of  eig e nc hannels[@Blio k h1 5] , in th is  secti on  we  st udy n u meri callythe reso nance structure ${\t i lde I}_{\math c al { T }% _n}( x)$ . It is wel l kn o wn [ Bere z in ski i 73]{}  that  i n  s t rictly $1$D, thereis  no di ffusi ve regime, be cause thel o c alizatio n le n gt h  is $\sim\ell$ . Ins tead, ther e  are onl y bal listic a nd locali z e d regime s.Wecon sid e r  t he former bel o w .

I nsimulat ion s, thesam ple  co nsi st s of $51$  scatter er sse pa rat ed by $50$ lay er s,wh ose  thic k nesses  (res cale dby the  invers e  w a v e nu mb er  inthe  b ackgr ound )  ar e rando mly distr ibu t ed i nth e inter val $d_0 \pm\d elta$, wit h$%d_0 =1 0 .0$ and$\delta = 9.0$. Thus $L = 50 d_0$ . T he sc atte rers arecha racter ize d  by th e refl ectio ncoe f f icien t s  $ r_i $between th e nei ghbou ri ng l ayers ( $i$ labels the sca t ter ers.), whichare  cho s e nran d om l y a nd ind e p endently from t he interva lo f$(-s,s)$,w ith  $ s\in (0 ,1)$ go verni n g the d isorder s trength.We  cha n g e t he frequen cy $\Ome ga$ in an arrow ba nd ce nte red at  $ \Om ega_0 $ ando f h alf-w idth $ %5\%\ti mes \ Om ega_0$,and calculate the trans mittan ce sp ect rum $\mat hca l {T} %
(\Omega )$ b y using th e s tan dardtra n sfermatr i xapp r oach.  Wea lso chang e  d iso r d er  configurat i o n s,so th atf or eac h re sonant transmissi o n $\mathcal{T} %
_n $ ,  $5 \ti m es 1 0^ 5$
4\]. We_see, strikingly,_that for slabs with_different number_of_$N$ (i.e.,_width_$W$) the structures_of $%
W_\tau(x)$ are_in excellent agreement with_$W_\tau(x)$ described by_Eqs. (\[eq:9\]),_(\[eq:10\]) and (\[eq:11\]).

Resonance structure {#sec:resonance_structure}
===================

In the previous section, we have seen that in both_$2$D_slabs and_quasi-$1$D_waveguides_the ensemble averaged eigenchannel structure_$W_\tau(x)$ is described by the_universal formula_Eqs. (\[eq:9\]), (\[eq:10\]) and ([eq:11]{}). It is natural to_ask_whether this universality_can be extended to strictly $1$D systems, in which_the transmission eigenchannel does not exist._Noting that the_resonant_transmissions_have the same bimodal_statistics as the transmission eigenvalues of_eigenchannels [@Bliokh15], in this section we_study numerically the resonance structure ${\tilde I}_{\mathcal{T}%
_n}(x)$._It is well known [Berezinskii73]{} that_in strictly $1$D, there is_no diffusive_regime, because the localization length_is $\sim\ell$. Instead,_there are_only ballistic and_localized regimes. We consider the former_below.

In simulations, the_sample consists of $51$ scatterers separated_by_$50$ layers, whose_thicknesses_(rescaled_by the_inverse wave number_in_the background)_are_randomly distributed in the interval $d_0_\pm_\delta$, with $%
d_0 = 10.0$ and $\delta_= 9.0$. Thus $L=50_d_0$._The scatterers are characterized_by the reflection coefficients $r_i$_between the neighbouring layers ($i$ labels_the scatterers.),_which are_chosen randomly and independently from the interval of $(-s,s)$, with $s\in_(0,1)$ governing the disorder strength. We_change the frequency $\Omega$_in a_narrow_band centered at_$\Omega_0$_and of_half-width $%
5\%\times \Omega_0$, and calculate the transmittance_spectrum $\mathcal{T}%
(\Omega)$_by using the standard transfer matrix_approach. We also change_disorder_configurations, so that for each resonant_transmission $\mathcal{T}%
_n$, $5\times 10^5$