 are identical, but performing the averaging just before the MS simplifies the calculations. Moreover, notice also that the $m$-mode state (\[rho:out\]) is [*separable*]{} and all the $m$ outputs $\varrho_k$ are equal.

As figure of merit to characterize the performance of the $1\to m$ cloning machine, we consider the fidelity, which is a measure of similarity between the hypothetically perfect clone, i.e., the input state, and the actual clone. If the cloning fidelity is independent on the initial state the machine is referred to as a [*universal*]{} cloner. In the present case, the fidelity is the same for all the clones $\varrho_k$ and is given by: $$\begin{aligned}
F_\eta(\alpha,\tau,m) &= {\left\langle \left.  \alpha \right| \right.}\varrho_{k} {\left| \left. \alpha \right\rangle \right.}\\
&= \int_{\mathbbm{C}} d^2z\, p_\eta(z) \,
\exp\left\{-\left| \alpha -\frac{\alpha\sqrt{\tau} + g z}{\sqrt{m}}
\right|^2 \right\}\\
&= \frac{m\eta}{g^2 + m\eta} \exp\left\{ -
\frac{\eta\left[g\sqrt{1-\tau}+\sqrt{\tau} - \sqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2 + m \eta}
 |\alpha|^2 \right\}\,.\label{fidelity}\end{aligned}$$ If we set $$g = \frac{\sqrt{m} -  \sqrt{\tau}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$ Eq. (\[fidelity\]) becomes independent on the input coherent state amplitude, i.e., we have an universal cloning machine, and we get: $$F_\eta(\tau,m) = \frac{m \eta (1-\tau)}{(\sqrt{m} - \sqrt{\tau})^2 +
m\eta(1-\tau)}\,,$$ which reaches its maximum $$F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(m) = \frac{m\eta}{(1+\eta)m - 1}\,,$$ when $\tau = 1/m$. Notice that if $\eta \to 1$, then one obtains the optimal $1\to m$ cloning fidelity, i.
are identical, but performing the averaging just before the MS simplifies the calculations. Moreover, detect besides that the $ m$-mode state (\[rho: out\ ]) is [ * separable * ] { } and all the $ m$ output signal $ \varrho_k$ are adequate. 

 As figure of merit to characterize the operation of the $ 1\to m$ cloning car, we consider the fidelity, which is a measure of similarity between the hypothetically perfect clone, i.e., the input department of state, and the actual clone. If the cloning fidelity is independent on the initial department of state the machine is referred to as a [ * universal * ] { } cloner. In the present case, the fidelity is the same for all the ringer $ \varrho_k$ and is given by: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 F_\eta(\alpha,\tau, m) & = { \left\langle \left.   \alpha \right| \right.}\varrho_{k } { \left| \left. \alpha \right\rangle \right.}\\ 
 & = \int_{\mathbbm{C } } d^2z\, p_\eta(z) \, 
 \exp\left\{-\left| \alpha -\frac{\alpha\sqrt{\tau } + g z}{\sqrt{m } } 
 \right|^2 \right\}\\ 
 & = \frac{m\eta}{g^2 + m\eta } \exp\left\ { - 
 \frac{\eta\left[g\sqrt{1-\tau}+\sqrt{\tau } - \sqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2 + m \eta } 
  |\alpha|^2 \right\}\,.\label{fidelity}\end{aligned}$$ If we set $ $ thousand = \frac{\sqrt{m } -   \sqrt{\tau}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$ Eq.   (\[fidelity\ ]) becomes independent on the input coherent state amplitude, i.e., we experience an universal cloning machine, and we get: $ $ F_\eta(\tau, m) = \frac{m \eta (1-\tau)}{(\sqrt{m } - \sqrt{\tau})^2 + 
 m\eta(1-\tau)}\,,$$ which reaches its maximum $ $ F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(m) = \frac{m\eta}{(1+\eta)m - 1}\,,$$ when $ \tau = 1 / m$. notification that if $ \eta \to 1 $, then one obtains the optimal $ 1\to m$ cloning fidelity, i.
 arf identical, but performikg the averaging just bxfore tge MS sioplifies the calculations. Moceovwr, noupce also that the $m$-moae state (\[gho:out\]) is [*seperable*]{} and all tis $m$ outibts $\vzvrho_k$ ere equal.

As figore of merit to characterise tke performance of the $1\to m$ cloning mwchine, ee consider the sidekyty, shich is a measure of similarity bstween uhe hypothetically perfect clone, i.e., the inpuh stwte, and the actual clone. If tye cjining fideligy is indekeudent on thg initial state the machine is rdferrzd to as a [*ouuvegval*]{} cloner. Mn the present casc, the fhdelity is the same fpr ell rhe clones $\varrho_k$ anv is given by: $$\begin{ajigned}
F_\etd(\ampha,\tau,m) &= {\left\lantlw \lefj.  \al[ha \fughg| \rjgit.}\vzrrho_{k} {\leht| \left. \alpga \right\rantle \right.}\\
&= \int_{\mathbbk{C}} e^2z\, p_\eta(z) \,
\exp\lsft\{-\lefe| \wlpha -\frac{\alpha\sqrt{\tau} + g z}{\sqrt{m}}
\right|^2 \rpght\}\\
&= \frac{m\eta}{g^2 + m\eta} \exp\lefr\{ -
\frac{\eta\left[g\sqrt{1-\tau}+\dqrt{\tau} - \fqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2 + m \eta}
 |\alpha|^2 \right\}\,.\label{fidelity}\end{alicned}$$ Mf we sct $$g = \fgac{\sqrt{m} -  \sqrt{\tau}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$ Eq. (\[fidelity\]) becomes yhdtpekdent on the inpmt coherent state smolojude, i.e., we havg an unnbedsal cloning machije, and re ger: $$F_\eta(\tau,i) = \ftac{m \eta (1-\tau)}{(\sqrt{m} - \sqrt{\tau})^2 +
n\eta(1-\tau)}\,,$$ whick rwaches its maximum $$F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(o) = \ftac{m\ets}{(1+\eta)m - 1}\,,$$ when $\tau = 1/m$. Notnce thzt if $\eta \tl 1$, then ohd obtains the opgimsl $1\to m$ cloning fidelity, i.
are identical, but performing the averaging just MS the calculations. notice also that [*separable*]{} all the $m$ $\varrho_k$ are equal. figure of merit to characterize the of the $1\to m$ cloning machine, we consider the fidelity, which is a of similarity between the hypothetically perfect clone, i.e., the input state, and the clone. the fidelity independent on the initial state the machine is referred to as a [*universal*]{} cloner. In the case, the fidelity is the same for all clones $\varrho_k$ and is by: $$\begin{aligned} F_\eta(\alpha,\tau,m) &= {\left\langle \alpha \right.}\varrho_{k} {\left| \alpha \right.}\\ \int_{\mathbbm{C}} d^2z\, p_\eta(z) \exp\left\{-\left| \alpha -\frac{\alpha\sqrt{\tau} + g z}{\sqrt{m}} \right|^2 \right\}\\ &= \frac{m\eta}{g^2 + m\eta} \exp\left\{ - \frac{\eta\left[g\sqrt{1-\tau}+\sqrt{\tau} - \sqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2 m \eta} If we $$g \frac{\sqrt{m} \sqrt{\tau}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$ Eq. (\[fidelity\]) on the input coherent state amplitude, an universal cloning machine, and we get: $$F_\eta(\tau,m) \frac{m \eta - \sqrt{\tau})^2 + m\eta(1-\tau)}\,,$$ which reaches maximum $$F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(m) = \frac{m\eta}{(1+\eta)m - 1}\,,$$ when = 1/m$. Notice that if $\eta \to 1$, then one obtains the optimal $1\to m$ i.
 are identical, but performing The averagiNg jusT beForE tHe MS SimpLifies the calcuLAtioNs. Moreover, notice also thAt the $M$-mODe stATe (\[Rho:ouT\]) is [*sepaRAbLE*]{} And AlL tHe $m$ OuTPuTs $\varRho_K$ are equAl.

As figure Of mErIt to characteRIzE the perforManCe of the $1\to m$ clOniNg machInE, we COnsidEr tHe fidElity, wHIch is a Measure of SiMIlaritY Between THE hYpotHetically perfect cLOnE, I.e., the input statE, and thE aCTuAL CloNe. IF the cloninG fIdeliTY is indePEnDENT on THe initial statE the machine IS reFerred To As a [*UNiversAl*]{} cloNeR. in tHe present caSe, thE fidelity Is the sAMe for alL The clonEs $\varrHo_k$ And Is giVEn By: $$\BegIn{ALigNEd}
f_\etA(\AlpHa,\tau,m) &= {\leFt\LaNgle \lEft.  \aLPHA \RighT| \riGht.}\vArrho_{K} {\left| \left. \alphA \riGht\rANglE \righT.}\\
&= \int_{\mAthbBm{c}} d^2z\, p_\eTa(z) \,
\exp\Left\{-\lEfT| \alpha -\frac{\alpha\Sqrt{\Tau} + g z}{\sqrt{M}}
\riGhT|^2 \riGhT\}\\
&= \frac{M\Eta}{g^2 + m\eTa} \eXp\lEft\{ -
\frac{\Eta\left[G\SqrT{1-\tAU}+\SQrT{\tau} - \sqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2 + m \etA}
 |\aLPHa|^2 \Right\}\,.\labEl{fideLItY}\eND{aligned}$$ if We sEt $$g = \fRAC{\sqrt{M} -  \sqrT{\TaU}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$ eq. (\[fideLItY\]) bEcomes iNdEpendeNt On tHe iNput cOHereNt statE amplituDe, i.e., wE Have an universaL Cloning machinE, AnD WE gET: $$F_\etA(\taU,m) = \frac{m \eta (1-\tAu)}{(\sqRT{m} - \sqRt{\taU})^2 +
M\eTa(1-\tAU)}\,,$$ whicH reacHeS ItS Maximum $$F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(m) = \frAc{M\eta}{(1+\etA)m - 1}\,,$$ wheN $\tau = 1/m$. Notice thAt if $\eta \to 1$, tHEN One obtaiNs thE OpTImal $1\to m$ cloning FidelIty, i.
 are identical, but perfor ming the a verag ing  ju st  bef orethe MS simplif i es t he calculations. Moreo ver,no t icea ls o tha t the $ m $- m o dest at e ( \[ r ho :out\ ])is [*se parable*]{ } a nd  all the $m$ ou tputs $\va rrh o_k$ are equ al. 

As f ig ure of me rit  to c haract e rize t he perfor ma n ce oft he $1\t o m$  clo ning machine, wec on s ider the fidel ity, w hi c hi s  amea sure of si mi larit y  betwee n  t h e hyp o thetically pe rfect clone ,  i. e., th einp u t stat e, an dt heactual clon e. I f the clo ning f i delityi s indep endent  on  th e in i ti al  st at e  th e  m ach i neis refer re dto as  a [ * u n i vers al* ]{}clone r. In the pre sen t ca s e,the f ideli ty i sthe s ame fo r all  t he clones $\var rho_ k$ and is  gi ve n b y:  $$\b e gin{al ign ed} 
F_\eta (\alpha , \ta u, m ) &=  {\left\langle \le ft .  \ alpha \r ight|\ ri gh t .}\varrh o_ {k}  {\l e f t| \l eft. \a lpha \ri ght\ra n gl e\right. }\ \
&= \ in t_{ \ma thbbm { C}}d^2z\,  p_\eta( z) \, \exp\left\{-\l e ft| \alpha -\ f ra c { \a l pha\ sqr t{\tau} + g  z}{ \ sqrt {m}} \r igh t |^2 \ right \} \ \& = \frac{m\eta}{g^2+m\eta}  \exp \left\{ -
\fr ac{\eta\le f t [ g\sqrt{1 -\ta u }+ \ sqrt{\tau} - \ sqrt{ m}\right]^ 2 }{g^2 +m \et a}
 |\al pha|^2 \r i g ht\}\,.\ lab el{ fid eli t y }\ end{aligned}$ $ If w eset $$g  =\frac{\ sqr t{m } -   \ sq rt{\tau}} {\sqrt{1 -\ ta u} }\ ,,$ $ Eq. (\[fidel it y\] )bec omesi ndepen denton t he  i n put  cohere n ts t ateam pl itud e,i. e., w e ha v e a n unive rsal clon ing mach in e,  and we  get: $$F_\et a( \tau,m) =\f rac {m \et a (1-\tau) }{(\sqrt{m} - \sqrt{\ta u })^2 +m\e ta(1- \tau )}\,,$$ w hic h reac hes its ma ximum$$F_\ et a^{ \ r m (ma x ) }( m)=\frac{m\et a } {(1 +\eta )m  - 1 }\,,$$when $\tau = 1/m$. Not ice that if $ \et a \t o 1$ , t h en one  o b tai n s  the optimal $1 \to m$ clo ni n gfidelity,i .
 are_identical, but_performing the averaging just_before the_MS_simplifies the_calculations._Moreover, notice also_that the $m$-mode_state (\[rho:out\]) is [*separable*]{}_and all the_$m$_outputs $\varrho_k$ are equal.

As figure of merit to characterize the performance of the $1\to_m$_cloning machine,_we_consider_the fidelity, which is a_measure of similarity between the_hypothetically perfect_clone, i.e., the input state, and the actual_clone._If the cloning_fidelity is independent on the initial state the machine_is referred to as a [*universal*]{}_cloner. In the_present_case,_the fidelity is the_same for all the clones $\varrho_k$_and is given by: $$\begin{aligned}
F_\eta(\alpha,\tau,m) &=_{\left\langle \left.  \alpha \right| \right.}\varrho_{k} {\left|_\left. \alpha \right\rangle \right.}\\
&= \int_{\mathbbm{C}} d^2z\,_p_\eta(z) \,
\exp\left\{-\left| \alpha -\frac{\alpha\sqrt{\tau} +_g z}{\sqrt{m}}
\right|^2_\right\}\\
&= \frac{m\eta}{g^2 + m\eta} \exp\left\{_-
\frac{\eta\left[g\sqrt{1-\tau}+\sqrt{\tau} - \sqrt{m}\right]^2}{g^2_+ m_\eta}
 |\alpha|^2 \right\}\,.\label{fidelity}\end{aligned}$$_If we set $$g = \frac{\sqrt{m}_-  \sqrt{\tau}}{\sqrt{1-\tau}}\,,$$_Eq. (\[fidelity\]) becomes independent on the input_coherent_state amplitude, i.e.,_we_have_an universal_cloning machine, and_we_get: $$F_\eta(\tau,m)_=_\frac{m \eta (1-\tau)}{(\sqrt{m} - \sqrt{\tau})^2 +
m\eta(1-\tau)}\,,$$_which_reaches its maximum $$F_\eta^{\rm (max)}(m) = \frac{m\eta}{(1+\eta)m_- 1}\,,$$ when $\tau_=_1/m$. Notice that if_$\eta \to 1$, then one_obtains the optimal $1\to m$ cloning_fidelity, i.