–10keV) X-ray emission shows no variability, and likely it is not a Compton-thick AGN, if an AGN is present in NGC 1614, it must be an intrinsically X-ray weak AGN. We also calculated an upper limit to the IR luminosity of the nucleus, $<$6$\times$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$.

4.  Alternatively, SF can explain the observations of the nucleus too. However, we need to invoke extremely short molecular gas depletion times ($<$3Myr [for a nuclear SFR of $\sim$1–1.5yr$^{-1}$]{}), and an increased radiation field density to explain the observed hot dust in the nucleus.

5.  Finally, we compared three SFR tracers at 150pc scales [in the circumnuclear ring]{}: extinction corrected Pa$\alpha$, 11.3 PAH, and 24 continuum. Since the extinction is not extremely high ($A_{\rm v}<10$mag), we take as reference the Pa$\alpha$ derived SFR. In general, the 24 SFR overestimates the SFR by a factor of 2–3, while the 11.3 PAH underestimates the SFR by a factor of 2–4. The former might be explained if the dust temperature is higher in the SF regions of NGC 1614, while the latter [could be because we do not include diffuse PAH emission in our measurements as well as because the PAH contribution to the total IR luminosity might be reduced in LIRGs.]{}

6.  In the West region of the ring, the 24 emission is $\sim$5 times weaker than expected based on the observed Pa$\alpha$/24 ratio in this galaxy. We propose that this is because this is a more evolved SF region (SN are present; @Herrero-Illana2014) where a larger fraction of the young stars are not dust embedded.

In summary, our mid-IR data suggest that an intrinsically X-ray weak AGN ($L^{\rm AGN}_{\rm bol}\sim$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$, $<$5% of the NGC 1614 bolometric luminosity) might be present in the nucleus of NGC 1614. However, SF with a short molecular gas depletion time and increased dust temperatures can explain the observations as well. In order to further investigate the nature of the nucleus of this galaxy, IR and sub-mm high-angular resolution observations are needed.

– 10keV) X - ray emission shows no unevenness, and probably it is not a Compton - blockheaded AGN, if an AGN is present in NGC   1614, it must be an intrinsically X - ray unaccented AGN. We also calculated an upper terminus ad quem to the IR luminosity of the nucleus, $ < $ 6$\times$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$. 

 4.   Alternatively, SF can explain the observations of the core too. However, we need to appeal extremely short molecular flatulence depletion time ($ < $ 3Myr [ for a nuclear SFR of $ \sim$1–1.5yr$^{-1}$ ] { }), and an increased radiation field density to explain the observe hot dust in the nucleus. 

 5.   last, we compared three SFR tracers at 150pc scales [ in the circumnuclear ring ] { }: extinction correct Pa$\alpha$, 11.3   PAH, and 24   continuum. Since the extinction is not extremely high ($ A_{\rm v}<10$mag), we take as reference the Pa$\alpha$ derived SFR. In cosmopolitan, the 24   SFR overestimates the SFR by a factor of 2–3, while the 11.3   PAH underestimates the SFR by a factor of 2–4. The former might be explained if the debris temperature is high in the SF regions of NGC   1614, while the latter [ could be because we do not include diffuse PAH emission in our measurements as well as because the PAH contribution to the total IR luminosity might be reduced in LIRGs. ] { } 

 6.   In the West region of the ring, the 24   discharge is $ \sim$5 times weaker than expect free-base on the observed Pa$\alpha$/24   ratio in this galaxy. We propose that this is because this is a more evolved SF region (SN are present; @Herrero - Illana2014) where a larger fraction of the young asterisk are not dust embedded. 

 In summary, our mid - IR data suggest that an intrinsically X - ray fallible AGN ($ L^{\rm AGN}_{\rm bol}\sim$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$, $ < $ 5%   of the NGC   1614 bolometric luminosity) might be present in the nucleus of NGC   1614. However, SF with a short molecular gas depletion time and increased dust temperature can explain the observations as well. In order to further investigate the nature of the core of this galaxy, IR and sub - mm high - angular resolution observation are needed.
–10keV) X-ray emission shows no yariability, and likely mt is nkt a Comoton-thick AGN, if an AGN is pcesebt in NGC 1614, it must be an intfinsicallj X-ray weqk AJN. We also calculated an upper pimic vo the IR luminpsity of tve nucleus, $<$6$\timas$10$^{43}$drys$^{-1}$.

4.  Alternatively, SF can explain the observstlons of the nusleux too. However, we need to invoke extrememy shoru molecular gas delletion times ($<$3Myr [for a nufleag SFR of $\sim$1–1.5yr$^{-1}$]{}), and an increasgs rweiation fiela density uo explain tge observed hot dust in the nucueus.

5.  Finally, wg dolkared three WFR tgacers at 150pc scales [it the corcumnuclear rlng]{}: eetinxtion corrected Pa$\alpia$, 11.3 PAH, and 24 continuum. Since tha zxtinction is not exteenely vigh ($A_{\rm c}<10$mae), wt teke as reverxnce the Pa$\zlpha$ derivwd SFR. In general, tne 24 WFR overestimztes tre SFR by a factor of 2–3, while the 11.3 PAH undegestjmates the SFR by a facror of 2–4. The former mihht be ex[lained if the dust temperature is higher in the VF rejiuns on NGZ 1614, wjile the latter [could be because we do not insmuce diffuse PAH eiission in pug kgasurements as well ca gecause the PAH cojtributyon ti the totwl IT luminosity might be reducwd in LIRGs.]{}

6.  Un the West region of the riny, the 24 gmissipn is $\sim$5 times weaker chan espected basfd on the ubserved Pa$\alpha$/24 fatpo it this galaxy. We propose trat this ms beeause thks ix a mowe evolved SF rccion (SN are presenh; @Hertero-Ilnana2014) where a larger fraction of the young stars are not dgst embeddeb.

In sukmary, our mid-YR data suggesj that an intrknsically Q-ray weak AGN ($L^{\rm AGG}_{\rm bol}\sim$10$^{43}$ergv$^{-1}$, $<$5% of the NGC 1614 uolometris luninowity) mieft be present on the nubltus of NGC 1614. However, SF with a shudt molecular gaw dtpoetion time anc ivcrqadev duse temperaturev cav ebllain the observctkons as well. In order to furfher investigate tne nature if the ntcleus of thix galaxy, IR and suh-mm hmgh-angnlar rrsojution observations are needed.

–10keV) X-ray emission shows no variability, and is a Compton-thick if an AGN it be an intrinsically weak AGN. We calculated an upper limit to the luminosity of the nucleus, $<$6$\times$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$. 4. Alternatively, SF can explain the observations of nucleus too. However, we need to invoke extremely short molecular gas depletion times [for nuclear of and an increased radiation field density to explain the observed hot dust in the nucleus. 5. we compared three SFR tracers at 150pc scales the circumnuclear ring]{}: extinction Pa$\alpha$, 11.3 PAH, and 24 Since extinction is extremely ($A_{\rm we take as the Pa$\alpha$ derived SFR. In general, the 24 SFR overestimates the SFR by a factor of 2–3, the 11.3 the SFR a of The former might if the dust temperature is higher regions of NGC 1614, while the latter [could because we not include diffuse PAH emission in measurements as well as because the PAH contribution the total IR luminosity might be reduced in LIRGs.]{} 6. In the West region of the 24 emission is times weaker than based the Pa$\alpha$/24 in this We propose that this is because this is a more evolved region (SN are present; @Herrero-Illana2014) where a larger fraction of stars not dust embedded. summary, our mid-IR data that intrinsically X-ray weak AGN bol}\sim$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$, of bolometric might present in the nucleus NGC 1614. However, SF with short molecular gas depletion can explain the observations as well. In order further investigate the nature of the nucleus this galaxy, IR and sub-mm high-angular resolution observations are needed.
–10keV) X-ray emission shows no varIability, anD likeLy iT is NoT a CoMptoN-thick AGN, if an Agn is pResent in NGC 1614, it must be an iNtrinSiCAlly x-RaY weak aGN. We alSO cALCulAtEd An uPpER lImit tO thE IR lumiNosity of thE nuClEus, $<$6$\times$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$.

4.  aLtErnatively, sF cAn explain the ObsErvatiOnS of THe nucLeuS too. HOwever, WE need tO invoke exTrEMely shORt molecULAr Gas dEpletion times ($<$3Myr [fOR a NUclear SFR of $\sim$1–1.5Yr$^{-1}$]{}), and aN iNCrEASed RadIation fielD dEnsitY To explaIN tHE OBseRVed hot dust in tHe nucleus.

5.  FiNAllY, we comPaRed THree SFr tracErS At 150pC scales [in thE cirCumnucleaR ring]{}: eXTinctioN CorrectEd Pa$\alPha$, 11.3 pAH, And 24 cONtInUum. siNCe tHE eXtiNCtiOn is not eXtReMely hIgh ($A_{\RM V}<10$MAg), we TakE as rEfereNce the Pa$\alpha$ DerIved sfR. IN geneRal, thE 24 SFR OvErestImates The SFr bY a factor of 2–3, while The 11.3 PaH underesTimAtEs tHe sFR by A Factor Of 2–4. THe fOrmer miGht be exPLaiNeD IF ThE dust temperature is HiGHEr In the SF rEgions OF NgC 1614, WHile the lAtTer [CoulD BE becaUse wE Do Not incluDe diffUSe pAh emissiOn In our mEaSurEmeNts as WEll aS becauSe the PAH ContrIBution to the totAL IR luminosity MIgHT Be REducEd iN LIRGs.]{}

6.  In the west REgioN of tHE rIng, THe 24 emiSsion Is $\SIm$5 TImes weaker than expecTeD based On the Observed Pa$\alpHa$/24 ratio in tHIS Galaxy. We PropOSe THat this is becauSe thiS is a more evOLved SF reGion (Sn are presEnt; @HerrerO-iLlana2014) wheRe a LarGer FraCTIoN of the young stARS are NoT dust emBedDed.

In suMmaRy, oUr mId-Ir dAta suggesT that an iNtRiNsIcAllY X-ray WEak AGN ($L^{\rM AgN}_{\rM bOl}\sIm$10$^{43}$ergS$^{-1}$, $<$5% Of the NgC 1614 bolOmetRiC lUMinOsity) miGHt BE PresEnT iN the NucLeUs of NgC 1614. HoWEveR, SF with A short molEcuLAr gaS dEpLetion tIme and increasEd Dust temperAtUreS can exPLAin the obServations as well. In order TO furtheR inVestiGate The nature Of tHe nuclEus OF this gAlaxy, Ir and sUb-Mm hIGH-anguLAR rEsoLuTion observATIonS are nEeDed.

–10keV) X-ray emission sho ws no vari abili ty,  an dlike ly i t is not a Com p ton- thick AGN, if an AGN i s pre se n t in NG C 161 4, it m u st b e a nin tri ns i ca lly X -ra y weakAGN. We al soca lculated anu pp er limit t o t he IR lumino sit y of t he  nu c leus,  $< $6$\t imes$1 0 $^{43} $ergs$^{- 1} $ .

4.Alterna t i ve ly,SF can explain th e  o b servations ofthe nu cl e us t oo.  Ho wever, wene ed to invokee xt r e m ely short molecul ar gas depl e tio n time s($< $ 3Myr [ for a  n u cle ar SFR of $ \sim $1–1.5yr$ ^{-1}$ ] {}), an d  an inc reased  ra dia tion fi el d d en s ity to  ex p lai n the ob se rv ed ho t du s t i n th e n ucle us.
5.  Finally,wecomp a red  thre e SFR  tra ce rs at  150pc  scal es  [in the circum nucl ear ring] {}:  e xti nc tionc orrect edPa$ \alpha$ , 11.3P AH,  a n d 24  continuum. Sinceth e ex tinction  is no t  e xt r emely hi gh  ($ A_{\ r m  v}<1 0$ma g ),  we take  as re f er en ce thePa $\alph a$  de riv ed SF R . In  gener al, the24 SF R  overestimates the SFR by af ac t o ro f 2– 3,while the 1 1.3P AH u nder e st ima t es th e SFR  b y  a factor of 2–4. Thefo rmer m ightbe explainedif the dus t t emperatu re i s  h i gher in the SF  regi ons of NGC 1614, wh ile t he latte r [couldb e  because  we  do  no t i n c lu de diffuse PA H emis si on in o urmeasure men tsaswel las becaus e the PA Hco nt ri but ion t o  the tot al  IR  l umi nosit y  might  be r educ ed  i n  LI RGs.]{} 
6 .  Inth eWest  re gi on of  the rin g, the24 emissi oni s $\ si m$ 5 times  weaker thanex pected bas ed  on  the o b s erved Pa $\alpha$/24 ratio in th i s galax y.We pr opos e that th isis bec aus e  thisis a m ore e vo lve d SF re g i on  (S Nare presen t ;  @H errer o- Illa na2014)  where a larger fr a cti on of the you ngstar s ar e n o td ust  e m bed d e d.

In summary,  our mid-I Rd at a suggestt hat  a n intri nsicall y X-r a y weakAGN ($L^{ \rm AGN}_ {\ rm b o l }\s im$10$^{43 }$ergs$^ {-1}$, $< $ 5% of th e NGC  16 14 bol om etr ic lu minosi t y)might  be pr es ent in  thenu cleus of  NGC 1614. However, SFwith a  shor t m oleculargas dep letion ti me a nd increas eddus t tem per a tures  can ex pla i n the  obs e rvationsa swel l .  I n order tof u r the r inv est i gate t he n ature of the nucl e us of this gal axy, I R a nds ub-m mhigh-angular r eso lu t i on obser va tions are n eeded.

–10keV) X-ray_emission shows_no variability, and likely_it is_not_a Compton-thick_AGN,_if an AGN_is present in_NGC 1614, it must be_an intrinsically X-ray_weak_AGN. We also calculated an upper limit to the IR luminosity of the nucleus,_$<$6$\times$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$.

4._ Alternatively,_SF_can_explain the observations of the_nucleus too. However, we need_to invoke_extremely short molecular gas depletion times ($<$3Myr [for_a_nuclear SFR of_$\sim$1–1.5yr$^{-1}$]{}), and an increased radiation field density to explain_the observed hot dust in the_nucleus.

5.  Finally,_we_compared_three SFR tracers at_150pc scales [in the circumnuclear ring]{}:_extinction corrected Pa$\alpha$, 11.3 PAH, and 24 continuum._Since the extinction is not extremely high_($A_{\rm v}<10$mag), we take as reference_the Pa$\alpha$ derived SFR. In_general, the_24 SFR overestimates the SFR by_a factor of_2–3, while_the 11.3 PAH underestimates_the SFR by a factor of_2–4. The former_might be explained if the dust_temperature_is higher in_the_SF_regions of_NGC 1614, while the_latter_[could be_because_we do not include diffuse PAH_emission_in our measurements as well as because_the PAH contribution to_the_total IR luminosity might_be reduced in LIRGs.]{}

6. _In the West region of the_ring, the_24 emission is_$\sim$5 times weaker than expected based on the observed Pa$\alpha$/24 ratio in_this galaxy. We propose that this_is because this is_a more_evolved_SF region (SN_are_present; @Herrero-Illana2014)_where a larger fraction of the young_stars are_not dust embedded.

In summary, our mid-IR_data suggest that an_intrinsically_X-ray weak AGN ($L^{\rm AGN}_{\rm bol}\sim$10$^{43}$ergs$^{-1}$,_$<$5% of the NGC 1614 bolometric luminosity) might_be present in the nucleus_of_NGC 1614._However, SF with a short_molecular gas depletion time and increased_dust temperatures can_explain the observations as well. In order_to_further investigate the nature of the_nucleus_of this galaxy, IR and sub-mm_high-angular_resolution_observations are needed.
