pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t})$. It is consistent with the notations of section \[screclas\].

$t$-analogues of screening operators
------------------------------------

We introduced $t$-analogues of screening operators in [@Her01]. The picture of the last section enables us to define them from a new point of view.

For $m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have: $$[\tilde{S}_{i,l},m]=\tilde{S}_{i,l}m-m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=(t^{2u_{i,l}(m)}-1)m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=t^{u_{i,l}(m)}(t-t^{-1})[u_{i,l}(m)]_tm\tilde{S}_{i,l}$$ So for $\lambda\in {\mathcal{Y}}_t$ we have $[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in (t^2-1){\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$, and $[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\neq 0$ only for a finite number of $l\in{\mathbb{Z}}$. So we can define:

The $i^{th}$ $t$-screening operator is the map $S_{i,t}:{\mathcal{Y}}_t\rightarrow {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$ such that ($\lambda\in{\mathcal{Y}}_t$): $$S_{i,t}(\lambda)=\frac{1}{t^2-1}\underset{l\in{\mathbb{Z}}}{\sum}[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$$

In particular, $S_{i,t}$ is ${\mathbb{Z}}[t^{\pm}]$-linear and a derivation. It is our map of [@Her01].

For $m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have $\pi_+(S_{i,t}(m))=\pi_+(t^{u_{i,l}(m)-1}[u_{i,l}(m)]_t)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i,l})=u_{i,l}(m)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i,l})$ and the following commutative diagram: $$\begin{array}{rcccl
pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i, t})$. It is consistent with the notations of section \[screclas\ ]. 

 $ t$-analogues of screening operator 
 ------------------------------------ 

 We introduce $ t$-analogues of screening operator in [ @Her01 ]. The mental picture of the last section enable us to define them from a new point of position. 

 For $ m$ a $ { \mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have: $ $ [ \tilde{S}_{i, l},m]=\tilde{S}_{i, l}m - m\tilde{S}_{i, l}=(t^{2u_{i, l}(m)}-1)m\tilde{S}_{i, l}=t^{u_{i, l}(m)}(t - t^{-1})[u_{i, l}(m)]_tm\tilde{S}_{i, l}$$ So for $ \lambda\in { \mathcal{Y}}_t$ we get $ [ \tilde{S}_{i, l},\lambda]\in (t^2 - 1){\mathcal{Y}}_{i, t}$, and $ [ \tilde{S}_{i, l},\lambda]\neq 0 $ only for a finite number of $ l\in{\mathbb{Z}}$. So we can define: 

 The $ i^{th}$ $ t$-screening operator is the map $ S_{i, t}:{\mathcal{Y}}_t\rightarrow { \mathcal{Y}}_{i, t}$ such that ($ \lambda\in{\mathcal{Y}}_t$ ): $ $ S_{i, t}(\lambda)=\frac{1}{t^2 - 1}\underset{l\in{\mathbb{Z}}}{\sum}[\tilde{S}_{i, l},\lambda]\in { \mathcal{Y}}_{i, t}$$ 

 In especial, $ S_{i, t}$ is $ { \mathbb{Z}}[t^{\pm}]$-linear and a derivation. It is our map of [ @Her01 ]. 

 For $ m$ a $ { \mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have $ \pi_+(S_{i, t}(m))=\pi_+(t^{u_{i, l}(m)-1}[u_{i, l}(m)]_t)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i, l})=u_{i, l}(m)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i, l})$ and the be commutative diagram: $ $ \begin{array}{rcccl
pi_+({\mwthcal{Y}}_{i,t})$. It is consistekt with the notajiins of sectikn \[screcuas\].

$t$-analogues of screening o'erarors
------------------------------------

Wt introduced $t$-analoeues of sbreening iperetors in [@Her01]. The picture of ths lasc wection enablex us to dexine them from a nzw point of view.

For $m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monjmial, wr jave: $$[\tilde{S}_{i,l},m]=\jilde{X}_{y,l}m-m\fplbe{S}_{i,l}=(t^{2u_{i,l}(m)}-1)m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=t^{u_{i,l}(m)}(t-t^{-1})[u_{i,l}(m)]_tj\tilde{S}_{p,l}$$ So for $\lambda\im {\mathcal{Y}}_t$ we have $[\tilde{S}_{l,l},\lalbda]\in (t^2-1){\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$, and $[\tilde{S}_{u,l},\laivda]\neq 0$ only for a finpce number or $l\in{\mathbb{Z}}$. So we can define:

Thd $i^{th}$ $t$-screenint ipegdtor is the map $F_{i,t}:{\mathcal{Y}}_t\vpghtarrmw {\mathval{Y}}_{i,t}$ such thst ($\namvda\in{\mathcal{Y}}_t$): $$S_{i,t}(\lamuda)=\frac{1}{t^2-1}\underset{l\in{\mwthbb{Z}}}{\sum}[\dimde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in {\marhxal{Y}}_{i,j}$$

In pdrtizylaf, $S_{j,t}$ ia ${\mathhb{Z}}[v^{\pm}]$-linear ahd a derivarion. It is our map pf [@Yer01].

For $m$ a ${\mafhcal{Y}}_e$-mjnomial, we have $\pi_+(S_{i,t}(m))=\pi_+(t^{u_{i,l}(m)-1}[u_{i,l}(m)]_t)\pi_+(m\tinde{A}_{i,l})=u_{i,l}(m)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i,l})$ and rhe following commutajive diagrwm: $$\begin{array}{rcccl
pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t})$. It is consistent with the notations \[screclas\]. of screening ------------------------------------ We introduced [@Her01]. picture of the section enables us define them from a new point view. For $m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have: $$[\tilde{S}_{i,l},m]=\tilde{S}_{i,l}m-m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=(t^{2u_{i,l}(m)}-1)m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=t^{u_{i,l}(m)}(t-t^{-1})[u_{i,l}(m)]_tm\tilde{S}_{i,l}$$ So for $\lambda\in {\mathcal{Y}}_t$ we $[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in (t^2-1){\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$, and $[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\neq 0$ only for a finite number of $l\in{\mathbb{Z}}$. So can The $t$-screening is the map $S_{i,t}:{\mathcal{Y}}_t\rightarrow {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$ such that ($\lambda\in{\mathcal{Y}}_t$): $$S_{i,t}(\lambda)=\frac{1}{t^2-1}\underset{l\in{\mathbb{Z}}}{\sum}[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$$ In particular, $S_{i,t}$ is ${\mathbb{Z}}[t^{\pm}]$-linear and derivation. It is our map of [@Her01]. For a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have and the following commutative diagram:
pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t})$. It is consistenT with the noTatioNs oF seCtIon \[sCrecLas\].

$t$-analogues oF ScreEning operators
------------------------------------

We introdUced $t$-AnALoguES oF screEning opERaTORs iN [@HEr01]. the PiCTuRe of tHe lAst sectIon enables Us tO dEfine them froM A nEw point of vIew.

for $m$ a ${\mathcal{y}}_t$-mOnomiaL, wE haVE: $$[\tildE{S}_{i,L},m]=\tilDe{S}_{i,l}m-M\Tilde{S}_{I,l}=(t^{2u_{i,l}(m)}-1)m\tIlDE{S}_{i,l}=t^{u_{I,L}(m)}(t-t^{-1})[u_{i,l}(M)]_TM\tIlde{s}_{i,l}$$ So for $\lambda\in {\mAThCAl{Y}}_t$ we have $[\tildE{S}_{i,l},\laMbDA]\iN (T^2-1){\MatHcaL{Y}}_{i,t}$, and $[\tilDe{s}_{i,l},\laMBda]\neq 0$ oNLy FOR A fiNIte number of $l\iN{\mathbb{Z}}$. So wE Can Define:

thE $i^{tH}$ $T$-screeNing oPeRAtoR is the map $S_{i,T}:{\matHcal{Y}}_t\rigHtarroW {\Mathcal{y}}_{I,t}$ such tHat ($\lamBda\In{\mAthcAL{Y}}_T$): $$S_{I,t}(\lAmBDa)=\fRAc{1}{T^2-1}\unDErsEt{l\in{\matHbB{Z}}}{\Sum}[\tiLde{S}_{I,L},\LAMbda]\In {\mAthcAl{Y}}_{i,t}$$

in particular, $S_{I,t}$ iS ${\matHBb{Z}}[T^{\pm}]$-liNear aNd a dErIvatiOn. It is Our maP oF [@Her01].

For $m$ a ${\mathcaL{Y}}_t$-mOnomial, we HavE $\pI_+(S_{i,T}(m))=\Pi_+(t^{u_{i,L}(M)-1}[u_{i,l}(m)]_t)\Pi_+(m\TilDe{S}_{i,l})=u_{i,L}(m)\pi_+(m\tiLDe{S}_{I,l})$ AND ThE following commutatIvE DIaGram: $$\begiN{array}{RCcCl
pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t})$ . It is co nsist ent  wi th  the  not ations of sect i on \ [screclas\].

$t$-anal ogues  o f  scr e en ing o perator s 
- - - --- -- -- --- -- - -- ----- --- ------- ---

We in tro du ced $t$-anal o gu es of scre eni ng operators  in  [@Her 01 ].T he pi ctu re of  the l a st sec tion enab le s  us to definet h em  fro m a new point ofv ie w .

For $m$ a $ {\math ca l {Y } } _t$ -mo nomial, we  h ave:$ $[\tild e {S } _ { i,l } ,m]=\tilde{S} _{i,l}m-m\t i lde {S}_{i ,l }=( t ^{2u_{ i,l}( m) } -1) m\tilde{S}_ {i,l }=t^{u_{i ,l}(m) } (t-t^{- 1 })[u_{i ,l}(m) ]_t m\t ilde { S} _{ i,l }$ $  So fo r $ \ lam bda\in { \m at hcal{ Y}}_ t $ w e ha ve$[\t ilde{ S}_{i,l},\lam bda ]\in (t^ 2-1){ \math cal{ Y} }_{i, t}$, a nd $[ \t ilde{S}_{i,l},\ lamb da]\neq 0 $ o nl y f or  a fi n ite nu mbe r o f $l\in {\mathb b {Z} }$ . S owe can define:

Th e$ i ^{ th}$ $t$ -scree n in go peratoris  th e ma p $S_{i ,t}: { \m athcal{Y }}_t\r i gh ta rrow {\ ma thcal{ Y} }_{ i,t }$ su c h th at ($\ lambda\i n{\ma t hcal{Y}}_t$):$ $S_{i,t}(\lam b da ) = \f r ac{1 }{t ^2-1}\under set{ l \in{ \mat h bb {Z} } }{\su m}[\t il d e{ S }_{i,l},\lambda]\in  { \mathc al{Y} }_{i,t}$$

In  particula r , $S_{i,t} $ is ${ \ mathbb{Z}}[t^{ \pm}] $-linear a n d a deri vatio n. It is  our mapo f  [@Her01 ].
Fo r $ m$a ${ \mathcal{Y}}_ t $ -mon om ial, we  ha ve $\pi _+( S_{ i,t }(m )) =\pi_+(t^ {u_{i,l} (m )- 1} [u _{i ,l}(m ) ]_t)\pi_ +( m\t il de{ S}_{i , l})=u_ {i,l} (m)\ pi _+ ( m\t ilde{S} _ {i , l })$an dthefol lo wingcomm u tat ive dia gram: $$\ beg i n{ar ra y} {rcccl
pi_+({\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t})$. It_is consistent_with the notations of_section \[screclas\].

$t$-analogues_of_screening operators
------------------------------------

We_introduced_$t$-analogues of screening_operators in [@Her01]._The picture of the_last section enables_us_to define them from a new point of view.

For $m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we have:_$$[\tilde{S}_{i,l},m]=\tilde{S}_{i,l}m-m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=(t^{2u_{i,l}(m)}-1)m\tilde{S}_{i,l}=t^{u_{i,l}(m)}(t-t^{-1})[u_{i,l}(m)]_tm\tilde{S}_{i,l}$$_So for_$\lambda\in_{\mathcal{Y}}_t$_we have $[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in (t^2-1){\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$, and_$[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\neq 0$ only for a_finite number_of $l\in{\mathbb{Z}}$. So we can define:

The $i^{th}$ $t$-screening_operator_is the map_$S_{i,t}:{\mathcal{Y}}_t\rightarrow {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$ such that ($\lambda\in{\mathcal{Y}}_t$): $$S_{i,t}(\lambda)=\frac{1}{t^2-1}\underset{l\in{\mathbb{Z}}}{\sum}[\tilde{S}_{i,l},\lambda]\in {\mathcal{Y}}_{i,t}$$

In particular, $S_{i,t}$_is ${\mathbb{Z}}[t^{\pm}]$-linear and a derivation. It_is our map_of_[@Her01].

For_$m$ a ${\mathcal{Y}}_t$-monomial, we_have $\pi_+(S_{i,t}(m))=\pi_+(t^{u_{i,l}(m)-1}[u_{i,l}(m)]_t)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i,l})=u_{i,l}(m)\pi_+(m\tilde{S}_{i,l})$ and the following commutative_diagram: $$\begin{array}{rcccl