\] shows the obtained results. The used code length was $82~\mathrm{\mu s}$, and the observation window fixed to $40~\mathrm{ms}$. A tenfold degradation of the standard deviation is observed when moving from $0$ to a one-way distance of $25~\mathrm{km}$. Furthermore, beyond $34~\mathrm{km}$, the estimated phases are corrupted by a phase noise with much larger phase variance resulting from phase unwrapping errors (round-trip distance of $68~\mathrm{km}$ approaching the coherence length of the laser source (around $l_c=c_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\mathrm{km}$ for $\Delta\nu=600~\mathrm{Hz}$).

Dynamic regime
--------------

The sensor array is now tested in dynamic mode by means of two identical piezoelectric actuators placed at 25m and 95m from the sensor input. The used actuator is a $5~\mathrm{cm}$-outer-diameter ring with a radial efficiency of $400~\mathrm{pm/V}$. $1.5~\mathrm{m}$ of fiber is wound around each piezo, leading to $25~\mathrm{nm}$ of fiber extension per one volt of excitation voltage. We measured a phase shift of 1 radian for a $75~\mathrm{nm}$ fiber extension obtained by applying an excitation of 3 Volts.

As a first test, we simultaneously apply a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ (resp. $200~\mathrm{Hz}$) sine wave with a $10~\mathrm{Vpp}$ (resp. $4~\mathrm{Vpp}$) magnitude on the first (resp. second) actuator. The sensor array is probed with a $82~\mathrm{\mu s}$-long PDM-QPSK code. Figure \[fig:DisSens\](a) shows the phase measured as a function of time at each of the 10 FBGs. The black dotted curve represents the absolute phase measured at the first FBG. More interesting are the phase evolutions captured at the third and tenth FBGs: both sine waves are easily identified and their magnitudes are simply scaled by the radial efficiency of the actuator. Furthermore, phases measured at the other FBG locations are stable as a function of time, proving the absence of crosstalk between sensors. We performed additional measurements with a single active actuator excited by a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ sine wave to quantify the minimum rejection over all the remaining unexcited segments and
\ ] shows the obtained results. The used code duration was $ 82~\mathrm{\mu s}$, and the notice window fixed to $ 40~\mathrm{ms}$. A tenfold abasement of the standard deviation is observe when moving from $ 0 $ to a one - way distance of $ 25~\mathrm{km}$. Furthermore, beyond $ 34~\mathrm{km}$, the estimate phases are corrupted by a phase randomness with a lot larger phase variance result from phase unwrapping errors (orotund - trip distance of $ 68~\mathrm{km}$ approaching the coherence duration of the laser source (around $ l_c = c_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\mathrm{km}$ for $ \Delta\nu=600~\mathrm{Hz}$). 

 active regime 
 -------------- 

 The sensor array is now screen in dynamic mode by mean of two identical piezoelectric actuators station at 25 m and 95 m from the detector input. The used actuator is a $ 5~\mathrm{cm}$-outer - diameter ring with a radial efficiency of $ 400~\mathrm{pm / V}$. $ 1.5~\mathrm{m}$ of fiber is hurt around each piezo, leading to $ 25~\mathrm{nm}$ of fiber extension per one volt of excitation voltage. We measure a phase shift of 1 radian for a $ 75~\mathrm{nm}$ fiber extension obtained by applying an excitation of 3 Volts. 

 As a first test, we simultaneously apply a $ 500~\mathrm{Hz}$ (resp. $ 200~\mathrm{Hz}$) sine wave with a $ 10~\mathrm{Vpp}$ (resp. $ 4~\mathrm{Vpp}$) magnitude on the inaugural (resp. second) actuator. The sensor array is probed with a $ 82~\mathrm{\mu s}$-long PDM - QPSK code. name   \[fig: DisSens\](a) show the phase measured as a function of meter at each of the 10 FBGs. The black dotted curve represents the absolute phase measure at the first FBG. More interesting are the phase evolutions captured at the third and tenth FBGs: both sine waves are easily identified and their order of magnitude are simply scaled by the radial efficiency of the actuator. Furthermore, phases measured at the early FBG locations are static as a function of time, proving the absence of crosstalk between sensors. We performed additional measurement with a single active actuator excited by a $ 500~\mathrm{Hz}$ sine wave to quantify the minimum rejection over all the remaining unexcited segments and
\] shlws the obtained results. The used code length xas $82~\matgrm{\mu s}$, xnd the observation window fmxed to $40~\mqthrm{ms}$. A tenfold degrxdation ov the stqndacd deviation is observed when jlviny hrom $0$ to a one-wsy distanca of $25~\mathrm{km}$. Xuftkermore, beyond $34~\mathrm{km}$, the estimateq phasex wre corrupted fy a [hass noise with much larger phase varjance rtsulting from phasr unwrapping errors (round-tgip fistance of $68~\mathrm{nm}$ approachung eye coherence length of the laser skurce (around $l_c=c_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\mathro{km}$ fpr $\Delta\nu=600~\narhrl{Vz}$).

Dynamic rxgime
--------------

Tre sensor arvsy is tow tesyed in dynamic move bt means of two identiral piezoelectric acjuators pldczd at 25m and 95m from thw wensot inpgt. Tfw ured artuztor id a $5~\mathrm{cm}$-ohter-diametee ring with a radiak qdficiency of $400~\jathrm{[m/D}$. $1.5~\mathrm{m}$ of fiber is wound around each piszo, leading to $25~\mathrm{nm}$ of fiber extension pgr one vole of excitation voltage. We measured a phase shift of 1 caaiau for x $75~\mwthrm{nm}$ fiber extension obtained by applying wh txcptation of 3 Volts.

Cs a first test, ee soiultaneously xpply c $500~\mzthrm{Hz}$ (resp. $200~\mathrl{Hz}$) sing wave with a $10~\mwthrk{Vpp}$ (resp. $4~\mathrm{Vpp}$) magnituee on the figst (eesp. second) actuatlr. The sensur atray ix probed with a $82~\mathrm{\mb s}$-lonf PDM-QPSK clde. Figurs \[wig:DisSens\](a) showr tme [hase measured as a functijn of timx at zach of ghe 10 FBGs. Ehe black fotted curve represents hhe aysolude phase mfasured at the first FBG. More iiveresting are tve ihase evojutioks captured at ehe third and jenth FBGf: botf sine wavvs are eavily identisied and theis magnitudes ere simplr scqled by the fadial efficiemcy of thv cctuator. Durthermore, phases mexaured at the otktr DBG locations ate rtaflv ax w function of timd, pfpving the absencc ow crpsstalk between sensmrs. Se performed additookal measutements wyth a single sctive actuator exfited by a $500~\mayhri{Hz}$ sine wave to quantify the jinimum rfjegtion over alj thc reiaining unzxcited segments and
\] shows the obtained results. The used was s}$, and observation window fixed of standard deviation is when moving from to a one-way distance of $25~\mathrm{km}$. beyond $34~\mathrm{km}$, the estimated phases are corrupted by a phase noise with much phase variance resulting from phase unwrapping errors (round-trip distance of $68~\mathrm{km}$ approaching the length the source $l_c=c_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\mathrm{km}$ for $\Delta\nu=600~\mathrm{Hz}$). Dynamic regime -------------- The sensor array is now tested in dynamic mode by of two identical piezoelectric actuators placed at 25m 95m from the sensor The used actuator is a ring a radial of $1.5~\mathrm{m}$ fiber is wound each piezo, leading to $25~\mathrm{nm}$ of fiber extension per one volt of excitation voltage. We measured a shift of for a fiber obtained applying an excitation Volts. As a first test, we $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ (resp. $200~\mathrm{Hz}$) sine wave with a $10~\mathrm{Vpp}$ $4~\mathrm{Vpp}$) magnitude the first (resp. second) actuator. The array is probed with a $82~\mathrm{\mu s}$-long PDM-QPSK Figure \[fig:DisSens\](a) shows the phase measured as a function of time at each of the The black dotted curve the absolute phase at first More are the evolutions captured at the third and tenth FBGs: both sine waves easily identified and their magnitudes are simply scaled by the of actuator. Furthermore, phases at the other FBG are as a function of the of We additional with a single active excited by a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ sine to quantify the minimum unexcited segments and
\] shows the obtained results. ThE used code lEngth Was $82~\MatHrM{\mu s}$, And tHe observation wINdow Fixed to $40~\mathrm{ms}$. A tenfolD degrAdATion OF tHe staNdard deVIaTIOn iS oBsErvEd WHeN moviNg fRom $0$ to a oNe-way distaNce Of $25~\Mathrm{km}$. FurtHErMore, beyond $34~\MatHrm{km}$, the estiMatEd phasEs Are COrrupTed By a phAse noiSE with mUch larger PhASe variANce resuLTInG froM phase unwrapping eRRoRS (round-trip distAnce of $68~\MaTHrM{KM}$ apProAching the cOhErencE Length oF ThE LASer SOurce (around $l_c=C_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\MAthRm{km}$ foR $\DEltA\Nu=600~\mathRm{Hz}$).

DYnAMic Regime
--------------

The seNsor Array is noW testeD In dynamIC mode by Means oF twO idEntiCAl PiEzoElECtrIC aCtuATorS placed aT 25m AnD 95m froM the SENSOr inPut. the uSed acTuator is a $5~\mathRm{cM}$-outER-diAmeteR ring With A rAdial EfficiEncy oF $400~\mAthrm{pm/V}$. $1.5~\mathrm{m}$ Of fiBer is wounD arOuNd eAcH piezO, LeadinG to $25~\MatHrm{nm}$ of Fiber exTEnsIoN PER oNe volt of excitation VoLTAgE. We measuRed a phASe ShIFt of 1 radiAn For A $75~\matHRM{nm}$ fiBer eXTeNsion obtAined bY ApPlYing an eXcItatioN oF 3 VoLts.

as a fiRSt teSt, we siMultaneoUsly aPPly a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ (reSP. $200~\mathrm{Hz}$) sine WAvE WItH A $10~\matHrm{vpp}$ (resp. $4~\mathRm{VpP}$) MagnItudE On The FIrst (rEsp. seCoND) aCTuator. The sensor arraY iS probeD with A $82~\mathrm{\mu s}$-lonG PDM-QPSK coDE. fIgure \[fig:disSENs\](A) Shows the phase mEasurEd as a functIOn of time At eacH of the 10 FBgs. The blacK DOtted curVe rEprEseNts THE aBsolute phase mEASureD aT the firSt FbG. More iNteResTinG arE tHe phase evOlutions CaPtUrEd At tHe thiRD and tentH FbGs: BoTh sIne waVEs are eAsily IdenTiFiED anD their mAGnITUdes ArE sImplY scAlEd by tHe raDIal EfficieNcy of the aCtuATor. FUrThErmore, pHases measured At The other FBg lOcaTions aRE Stable as A function of time, proving tHE absencE of CrossTalk Between seNsoRs. We peRfoRMed addItionaL measUrEmeNTS with A SInGle AcTive actuatOR ExcIted bY a $500~\MathRm{Hz}$ sinE wave to quantify the MIniMum rejection oVer All tHE ReMaiNInG UneXcITed SEGments and
\] shows the obtained resu lts. The u sed c ode  le ng th w as $ 82~\mathrm{\mu s}$,  and the observation w indow  f i xedt o$40~\ mathrm{ m s} $ .  Ate nf old  d e gr adati onof thestandard d evi at ion is obser v ed  when movi ngfrom $0$ toa o ne-way  d ist a nce o f $ 25~\m athrm{ k m}$. F urthermor e, beyond $34~\ma t h rm {km} $, the estimatedp ha s es are corrupt ed byap ha s e  no ise  with much  l arger phase v a ri a n c e r e sulting fromphase unwra p pin g erro rs  (r o und-tr ip di st a nce  of $68~\ma thrm {km}$ app roachi n g the c o herence  lengt h o f t he l a se rsou rc e  (a r ou nd$ l_c =c_f/(\p i\ De lta\n u)=1 0 0 ~ \ math rm{ km}$  for$\Delta\nu=60 0~\ math r m{H z}$). 

Dyn amic  r egime 
----- ----- -- --

The sensorarra y is nowtes te d i ndynam i c mode  by  me ans oftwo ide n tic al p i ez oelectric actuator sp l ac ed at 25 m and9 5m  f r om the s en sor  inp u t . The  use d  a ctuatoris a $ 5 ~\ ma thrm{cm }$ -outer -d iam ete r rin g  wit h a ra dial eff icien c y of $400~\mat h rm{pm/V}$. $1 . 5~ \ m at h rm{m }$of fiber is  wou n d ar ound ea chp iezo,  lead in g  t o  $25~\mathrm{nm}$ o ffiberexten sion per onevolt of ex c i t ation vo ltag e .W e measured a p haseshift of 1 radian f or a$75~\mat hrm{nm}$f i ber exte nsi onobt ain e d  b y applying an e xcit at ion of3 V olts.
Asa f irs t t es t, we sim ultaneou sl yap pl y a  $500 ~ \mathrm{ Hz }$(r esp . $20 0 ~\math rm{Hz }$)si ne wav e witha  $ 1 0 ~\ma th rm {Vpp }$(r esp.$4~\ m ath rm{Vpp} $) magnit ude on t he  f irst (r esp. second)ac tuator. Th esen sor ar r a y is pro bed with a $82~\mathrm{ \ mu s}$- lon g PDM -QPS K code. F igu re \[f ig: D isSens \](a)shows  t hep h ase m e a su red  a s a functi o n  of  time  a t ea ch of t he 10 FBGs. The bl a ckdotted curverep rese n t sthe ab s olu te pha s e  measured at th e first FB G. Mo re interes t ing  a re thephase e volut i ons cap tured atthe third  a nd t e n thFBGs: both  sine wa ves are e a silyi de ntifi edand th ei r m agnit udes a r e s imply  scale dby the  radi al  efficie ncy of the actuator. Fu rtherm ore,pha ses measu red atthe other  FBG  locations  ar e s table  as a fun ctio n  o f t i me, p rovi n g the abs e nc e o f cr osstalk bet w e e n s ensor s.W e perf orme d additional meas u rements with a  sin g l e a cti v e ac tu ator excited b y a  $ 5 0 0~\mathr m{ Hz}$ sine w ave to q ua n tifythe mi nimumrejecti o n  o v er all  the  re maining u nex ci t ed segm en ts and
\] shows_the obtained_results. The used code_length was_$82~\mathrm{\mu_s}$, and_the_observation window fixed_to $40~\mathrm{ms}$. A_tenfold degradation of the_standard deviation is_observed_when moving from $0$ to a one-way distance of $25~\mathrm{km}$. Furthermore, beyond $34~\mathrm{km}$, the_estimated_phases are_corrupted_by_a phase noise with much_larger phase variance resulting from_phase unwrapping_errors (round-trip distance of $68~\mathrm{km}$ approaching the coherence_length_of the laser_source (around $l_c=c_f/(\pi\Delta\nu)=100~\mathrm{km}$ for $\Delta\nu=600~\mathrm{Hz}$).

Dynamic regime
--------------

The sensor array is_now tested in dynamic mode by_means of two_identical_piezoelectric_actuators placed at 25m_and 95m from the sensor input._The used actuator is a $5~\mathrm{cm}$-outer-diameter_ring with a radial efficiency of $400~\mathrm{pm/V}$._$1.5~\mathrm{m}$ of fiber is wound around_each piezo, leading to $25~\mathrm{nm}$_of fiber_extension per one volt of_excitation voltage. We_measured a_phase shift of_1 radian for a $75~\mathrm{nm}$ fiber_extension obtained by_applying an excitation of 3 Volts.

As_a_first test, we_simultaneously_apply_a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$_(resp. $200~\mathrm{Hz}$) sine_wave_with a_$10~\mathrm{Vpp}$_(resp. $4~\mathrm{Vpp}$) magnitude on the first_(resp._second) actuator. The sensor array is probed_with a $82~\mathrm{\mu s}$-long_PDM-QPSK_code. Figure \[fig:DisSens\](a) shows the_phase measured as a function_of time at each of the_10 FBGs._The black_dotted curve represents the absolute phase measured at the first FBG._More interesting are the phase evolutions_captured at the third_and tenth_FBGs:_both sine waves_are_easily identified_and their magnitudes are simply scaled by_the radial_efficiency of the actuator. Furthermore, phases_measured at the other_FBG_locations are stable as a function_of time, proving the absence of_crosstalk between sensors. We performed_additional_measurements_with a single active actuator_excited by a $500~\mathrm{Hz}$ sine wave_to quantify the_minimum rejection over all the remaining unexcited_segments_and