q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r}
\Big(\sum\limits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{p(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big)^{\frac{q-p}{p}}\\
&\Big\{\sum\limits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{q(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big[\int^{2^{-1-2j'\beta}}_{0}\sum\limits_{(\epsilon',k')\in S^{w,j'}_{r}}|u^{\epsilon'}_{j',k'}(s)|^{p}(s2^{2j'\beta})^{m'}\frac{ds}{s}\Big]^{\frac{q}{p}}\Big\}.
\end{array}$$ Upon taking $0<\delta<p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta$ and changing the order of $j$ and $j'$, we reach $III^{m,1}_{b,Q_{r}}\lesssim\|u\|_{\B^{\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2},
IV}_{p,q,m'}}$.

The setting (iii)
-----------------

Like the subsection 8.2, it is sufficient to deal with the situation $1<p\leq2$ below. For $i=4,5$, define $$\begin{array}{rl}
II^{i}_{b,Q_{r}}(t)=&\!\!\!|Q_{r}|^{\frac{q\gamma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\sum\limits_{-\log_{2}r<j<-\frac{\log_{2}t}{2\beta}}2^{qj(\gamma_{1}+\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p})}
\Big(\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,k)\in S^{j}_{r}}|b^{\epsilon,i}_{j,k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^{\frac{q}{p}}.
\end{array}$$ We divide the argument into two cases. $$\nonumber\begin{cases}
\text{ Case 8.7: }
(t,x)\mapsto\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,j,k)\in\Lambda_{n}}b^{\epsilon,4}_{j,k}(t)\Phi^{\epsilon}_{j,k}(x)\ \
q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r } 
 \Big(\sum\limits_{j\leq 
 j'+2}2^{p(j - j')(p\gamma_{2}+2 - 2\beta-\delta)}\Big)^{\frac{q - p}{p}}\\ 
 & \Big\{\sum\limits_{j\leq 
 j'+2}2^{q(j - j')(p\gamma_{2}+2 - 2\beta-\delta)}\Big[\int^{2^{-1 - 2j'\beta}}_{0}\sum\limits_{(\epsilon',k')\in S^{w, j'}_{r}}|u^{\epsilon'}_{j',k'}(s)|^{p}(s2^{2j'\beta})^{m'}\frac{ds}{s}\Big]^{\frac{q}{p}}\Big\ }. 
 \end{array}$$ Upon taking $ 0<\delta < p\gamma_{2}+2 - 2\beta$ and changing the order of $ j$ and $ j'$, we reach $ III^{m,1}_{b, Q_{r}}\lesssim\|u\|_{\B^{\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2 }, 
 IV}_{p, q, m'}}$. 

 The place setting (iii) 
 ----------------- 

 Like the subsection 8.2, it is sufficient to cope with the situation $ 1 < p\leq2 $ below. For $ i=4,5 $, define $ $ \begin{array}{rl } 
 II^{i}_{b, Q_{r}}(t)=&\!\!\!|Q_{r}|^{\frac{q\gamma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\sum\limits_{-\log_{2}r < j<-\frac{\log_{2}t}{2\beta}}2^{qj(\gamma_{1}+\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p }) } 
 \Big(\sum\limits_{(\epsilon, k)\in S^{j}_{r}}|b^{\epsilon, i}_{j, k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^{\frac{q}{p } }. 
 \end{array}$$ We separate the argument into two cases. $ $ \nonumber\begin{cases } 
 \text { character 8.7: } 
 (t, x)\mapsto\sum\limits_{(\epsilon, j, k)\in\Lambda_{n}}b^{\epsilon,4}_{j, k}(t)\Phi^{\epsilon}_{j, k}(x)\ \
q}{p}}\skm\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r}
\Big(\sum\lioits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{p(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\velta)}\Bif)^{\frac{q-p}{p}}\\
&\Cig\{\sum\limits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{q(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beva-\deota)}\Bit[\int^{2^{-1-2j'\beta}}_{0}\sum\limits_{(\epsiuon',k')\in S^{w,u'}_{r}}|u^{\epsilin'}_{j',k'}(w)|^{p}(s2^{2j'\beta})^{m'}\fred{ds}{s}\Big]^{\nxac{q}{p}}\Glg\}.
\end{crcay}$$ Upon taking $0<\delta<p\gamka_{2}+2-2\beta$ and chatgkny the order of $j$ and $j'$, we reach $III^{m,1}_{f,Q_{r}}\lessxil\|u\|_{\B^{\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2},
ID}_{p,q,m'}}$.

Uhe setfpnn (iii)
-----------------

Like the subsection 8.2, it is aufficitnt to deal with tne situation $1<p\leq2$ below. Fog $i=4,5$, fefine $$\begin{array}{rp}
II^{i}_{b,Q_{r}}(t)=&\!\!\!|Q_{r}|^{\ftzc{q\dqmma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\sjm\limits_{-\log_{2}r<j<-\frac{\log_{2}t}{2\bgta}}2^{qj(\gamma_{1}+\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p})}
\Big(\sum\limitr_{(\epsikon,k)\in S^{j}_{r}}|v^{\epsipmn,i}_{j,k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^{\fcac{q}{p}}.
\egd{array}$$ We dlnide tha argumrnt into two cssev. $$\ninumber\begin{cases}
\text{ Case 8.7: }
(t,x)\mapsto\sum\jimits_{(\epshlkn,j,k)\in\Lambda_{n}}b^{\epsulin,4}_{j,k}(t)\Khi^{\epvilov}_{h,k}(x)\ \
q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r} \Big(\sum\limits_{j\leq j'+2}2^{p(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big)^{\frac{q-p}{p}}\\ &\Big\{\sum\limits_{j\leq j'+2}2^{q(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big[\int^{2^{-1-2j'\beta}}_{0}\sum\limits_{(\epsilon',k')\in S^{w,j'}_{r}}|u^{\epsilon'}_{j',k'}(s)|^{p}(s2^{2j'\beta})^{m'}\frac{ds}{s}\Big]^{\frac{q}{p}}\Big\}. \end{array}$$ $0<\delta<p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta$ changing the of $j$ and The (iii) ----------------- Like subsection 8.2, it sufficient to deal with the situation below. For $i=4,5$, define $$\begin{array}{rl} II^{i}_{b,Q_{r}}(t)=&\!\!\!|Q_{r}|^{\frac{q\gamma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\sum\limits_{-\log_{2}r<j<-\frac{\log_{2}t}{2\beta}}2^{qj(\gamma_{1}+\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p})} \Big(\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,k)\in S^{j}_{r}}|b^{\epsilon,i}_{j,k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^{\frac{q}{p}}. \end{array}$$ We divide the argument two cases. $$\nonumber\begin{cases} \text{ Case 8.7: } (t,x)\mapsto\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,j,k)\in\Lambda_{n}}b^{\epsilon,4}_{j,k}(t)\Phi^{\epsilon}_{j,k}(x)\ \
q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r}
\Big(\sum\Limits_{j\leq
J'+2}2^{p(j-j')(p\GamMa_{2}+2-2\bEtA-\delTa)}\BiG)^{\frac{q-p}{p}}\\
&\Big\{\sum\LImitS_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{q(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delTa)}\Big[\InT^{2^{-1-2J'\betA}}_{0}\SuM\limiTs_{(\epsilON',k')\IN s^{w,j'}_{R}}|u^{\EpSilOn'}_{J',K'}(s)|^{P}(s2^{2j'\beTa})^{m'}\Frac{ds}{s}\big]^{\frac{q}{p}}\BIg\}.
\eNd{Array}$$ Upon takINg $0<\Delta<p\gammA_{2}+2-2\beTa$ and changinG thE order Of $J$ anD $J'$, we reAch $iII^{m,1}_{b,q_{r}}\lessSIm\|u\|_{\B^{\gaMma_{1},\gamma_{2},
Iv}_{p,Q,M'}}$.

The seTTing (iii)
-----------------

lIKe The sUbsection 8.2, it is suffICiENt to deal with thE situaTiON $1<p\LEQ2$ beLow. for $i=4,5$, define $$\BeGin{arRAy}{rl}
II^{i}_{B,q_{r}}(T)=&\!\!\!|q_{R}|^{\FraC{Q\gamma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\Sum\limits_{-\loG_{2}R<j<-\fRac{\log_{2}T}{2\bEta}}2^{QJ(\gamma_{1}+\Frac{n}{2}-\FrAC{n}{p})}
\big(\sum\limitS_{(\epsIlon,k)\in S^{j}_{R}}|b^{\epsiLOn,i}_{j,k}(t)|^{p}\bIg)^{\frac{q}{P}}.
\end{arRay}$$ we dIvidE ThE aRguMeNT inTO tWo cASes. $$\Nonumber\BeGiN{caseS}
\texT{ cASE 8.7: }
(t,x)\mApsTo\suM\limiTs_{(\epsilon,j,k)\in\lamBda_{n}}B^{\EpsIlon,4}_{j,K}(t)\Phi^{\EpsiLoN}_{j,k}(x)\ \
q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\ log_{2}r}\Big( \su m\l im its_ {j\l eq
j'+2}2^{p(j - j')( p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\ delta )} \ Big) ^ {\ frac{ q-p}{p} } \\ & \Bi g\ {\ sum \l i mi ts_{j \le q
j'+2} 2^{q(j-j') (p\ ga mma_{2}+2-2\ b et a-\delta)} \Bi g[\int^{2^{- 1-2 j'\bet a} }_{ 0 }\sum \li mits_ {(\eps i lon',k ')\in S^{ w, j '}_{r} } |u^{\ep s i lo n'}_ {j',k'}(s)|^{p}(s 2 ^{ 2 j'\beta})^{m'} \frac{ ds } {s } \ Big ]^{ \frac{q}{p }} \Big\ } .
\end{ a rr a y } $$U pon taking $0 <\delta<p\g a mma _{2}+2 -2 \be t a$ and  chan gi n g t he order of  $j$  and $j'$ , we r e ach $II I ^{m,1}_ {b,Q_{ r}} \le sssi m \| u\ |_{ \B ^ {\g a mm a_{ 1 },\ gamma_{2 }, 
I V}_{p ,q,m ' } } $ .

T hesett ing ( iii)
-------- --- ---- - -
Likethe s ubse ct ion 8 .2, it  is s uf ficient to deal  wit h the sit uat io n $ 1< p\leq 2 $ belo w.For  $i=4,5 $, defi n e $ $\ b e g in {array}{rl}
II^{i} _{ b , Q_ {r}}(t)= &\!\!\ ! |Q _{ r }|^{\fra c{ q\g amma _ { 2}}{n }-\f r ac {q}{p}}\ sum\li m it s_ {-\log_ {2 }r<j<- \f rac {\l og_{2 } t}{2 \beta} }2^{qj(\ gamma _ {1}+\frac{n}{2 } -\frac{n}{p}) } 
\ B i g( \ sum\ lim its_{(\epsi lon, k )\in  S^{ j }_ {r} } |b^{\ epsil on , i} _ {j,k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^ {\ frac{q }{p}} .
\end{array} $$ We divi d e the argu ment in t o two cases. $ $\non umber\begi n {cases}\text { Case 8 .7: }
(t, x ) \mapsto\ sum \li mit s_{ ( \ ep silon,j,k)\in \ L ambd a_ {n}}b^{ \ep silon,4 }_{ j,k }(t )\P hi ^{\epsilo n}_{j,k} (x )\  \ 
q}{p}}\sum\limits_{j\geq-\log_{2}r}
\Big(\sum\limits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{p(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big)^{\frac{q-p}{p}}\\
&\Big\{\sum\limits_{j\leq
j'+2}2^{q(j-j')(p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta-\delta)}\Big[\int^{2^{-1-2j'\beta}}_{0}\sum\limits_{(\epsilon',k')\in S^{w,j'}_{r}}|u^{\epsilon'}_{j',k'}(s)|^{p}(s2^{2j'\beta})^{m'}\frac{ds}{s}\Big]^{\frac{q}{p}}\Big\}.
\end{array}$$_Upon taking_$0<\delta<p\gamma_{2}+2-2\beta$ and changing the_order of_$j$_and $j'$,_we_reach $III^{m,1}_{b,Q_{r}}\lesssim\|u\|_{\B^{\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2},
IV}_{p,q,m'}}$.

The setting_(iii)
-----------------

Like the subsection_8.2, it is sufficient_to deal with_the_situation $1<p\leq2$ below. For $i=4,5$, define $$\begin{array}{rl}
II^{i}_{b,Q_{r}}(t)=&\!\!\!|Q_{r}|^{\frac{q\gamma_{2}}{n}-\frac{q}{p}}\sum\limits_{-\log_{2}r<j<-\frac{\log_{2}t}{2\beta}}2^{qj(\gamma_{1}+\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p})}
\Big(\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,k)\in S^{j}_{r}}|b^{\epsilon,i}_{j,k}(t)|^{p}\Big)^{\frac{q}{p}}.
\end{array}$$ We divide the argument into two_cases._$$\nonumber\begin{cases}
\text{ Case_8.7:_}
(t,x)\mapsto\sum\limits_{(\epsilon,j,k)\in\Lambda_{n}}b^{\epsilon,4}_{j,k}(t)\Phi^{\epsilon}_{j,k}(x)\_\