 for the group-representation matrices, all of which contain operators acting upon the spin-1/2 particles, which leads to the identification $$\begin{aligned}
\label  {identi}
  g\rightarrow 2\sqrt{ \frac{1}{ N}}.\end{aligned}$$ The normalization $N$ is calculated as in Eq. \[normalisation\], with the convention for the $\gamma$-matrices $$\begin{aligned}
\label  {groupnorgam}
 tr  \gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\end{aligned}$$ and irreducible representations $$\begin{aligned}
\label  {groupnor}
 trG_i G_j=2 \delta_{ij}.
 \end{aligned}$$ Essentially, we are setting normalization constants for the matrix elements in Eq. \[vertex\], which connect representations, and can be viewed as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. ${\mathcal L}_{f}$ contains sums over matrix elements for each $\mu$ and $a$, which determine the coupling constant; only two polarizations $\mu$ have a physical-state interpretation, while gauge and Lorentz invariance demand a unique value. Quantum field theory admits arbitrary coupling constants for a vertex, which are obtained experimentally. The theoretical assignment of $g$ complements this theory.

In comparing the fermion states with the vector ones, we find that the latter are composite only in the Lorentz and the gauge groups, whereas the configuration variable $x$ is elementary for both types of field. In general, an additional fermion index $\beta$ independent of $A^a_\mu$ corresponds to $\hat W_F=\sum |\beta \rangle\langle \beta| =1_F$, a unit operator present in the vertex, not contributing to the coupling constant. This is the flavor’s case. However, there are two consistent coupling definitions when such a kind of operator acts in a fermion subspace. Thus, e.g., $ SU(2)_L$ generators in a grand-unified theory such as $SU(5)$ are constructed with their lepton ($l$) and baryon ($b$) components as $G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(G_{SU(2)_Lb}\times 1_{SU(3)})$, with $1_{SU(3)}$ a projection operator in color space (leptons are color singlets); $1_{SU(3)}$ does not commute with some $SU(5)$
for the group - representation matrices, all of which contain operators act upon the spin-1/2 particle, which leads to the identification $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label   { identi } 
   g\rightarrow 2\sqrt { \frac{1 } { N}}.\end{aligned}$$ The normalization $ N$ is calculate as in Eq. \[normalisation\ ], with the convention for the $ \gamma$-matrices $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label   { groupnorgam } 
  tr   \gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\end{aligned}$$ and irreducible representations $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label   { groupnor } 
  trG_i G_j=2 \delta_{ij }. 
  \end{aligned}$$ basically, we are setting normalization constants for the matrix component in Eq. \[vertex\ ], which connect representations, and can be watch as Clebsch - Gordan coefficients. $ { \mathcal L}_{f}$ contains kernel over matrix elements for each $ \mu$ and $ a$, which settle the coupling constant; only two polarization $ \mu$ have a physical - state rendition, while gauge and Lorentz invariance necessitate a unique value. Quantum airfield theory accept arbitrary coupling constants for a vertex, which are obtained experimentally. The theoretical grant of $ g$ complements this theory. 

 In comparing the fermion states with the vector ones, we find that the latter are composite only in the Lorentz and the gauge groups, whereas the configuration variable $ x$ is elementary for both types of field. In general, an additional fermion index $ \beta$ independent of $ A^a_\mu$ corresponds to $ \hat W_F=\sum |\beta \rangle\langle \beta| = 1_F$, a unit of measurement operator present in the vertex, not contributing to the yoke constant. This is the spirit ’s casing. However, there are two consistent yoke definitions when such a kind of hustler acts in a fermion subspace. Thus, e.g., $ SU(2)_L$ generator in a grand - unified theory such as $ SU(5)$ are constructed with their lepton ($ l$) and baryon ($ b$) components as $ G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(G_{SU(2)_Lb}\times 1_{SU(3)})$, with $ 1_{SU(3)}$ a projection operator in color space (leptons are color singlet); $ 1_{SU(3)}$ does not commute with some $ SU(5)$
 fog the group-representatiok matrices, all oy which contajn operagors acting upon the spin-1/2 pacticoes, wyich leads to the idengificatioj $$\begin{aoigntd}
\label  {identi}
  j\dightarvjw 2\ssvt{ \frcc{1}{ N}}.\end{aligned}$$ Tme normalizdtion $N$ is calwuuaced as in Eq. \[normalisation\], with the sonventooj for the $\gammw$-matgises $$\gvgln{aligned}
\label  {groupnorgam}
 tr  \famma_\mu\jamma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\enc{aligned}$$ and irreducible rfpredentations $$\begin{allgned}
\label  {grotpnor}
 trG_i G_j=2 \delta_{ij}.
 \end{aligned}$$ Esaentially, we are setting normalkzatipn constanjs flt the matrix elemvnts in Eq. \[vevnex\], whiwh connrct representabions, ane can be viewed as Clxbsch-Gordan coefficignts. ${\mathcdl L}_{f}$ contains sums ocer mdtrif eldnengs roc ezch $\mu$ anv $a$, which dstermine thw coupling constant; ogoy two polariaationf $\iu$ have a physical-state interpretation, fhime gauge and Lorentz incariance demand a unieue value. Quantum field theory admits arbitrary coupling cmnstaitr fir x vfrtex, which are obtained experimentally. The trsotenical assignment jf $g$ complekejtx this theory.

Iv compcdihg the fermion stahes witr the vector oges, ee find that the latter are composite ouly in the Lorentz anb the gauge yroups, wherras the configuration vcriabls $x$ is elemfntary fod both types of fkelc. Hn general, an additional fqrmion invex $\bzta$ indeoendgnt of $W^a_\mu$ corredponds to $\hat W_F=\sum |\beta \rangpe\nangle \betw| =1_F$, a unit operator present in vie vertex, not cmntgibuting co the coupling conftant. This is jhe flavox’s casd. However, nhere are two consiseent coupling fefinitions xhen such a kund if operxgor acts in a germion slbfpacw. Thus, e.g., $ SU(2)_L$ gencratots in a grand-unifntd uhwory such as $SI(5)$ afe sojsvructqg with their lepgon ($k$) and baryon ($b$) cioponrnts as $G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(G_{SU(2)_Lb}\tikes 1_{AU(3)})$, with $1_{SU(3)}$ a projevtlon operajor in cojor space (lepyons are color sinhlets); $1_{SU(3)}$ does noj commute with some $SU(5)$
for the group-representation matrices, all of which acting the spin-1/2 which leads to g\rightarrow \frac{1}{ N}}.\end{aligned}$$ The $N$ is calculated in Eq. \[normalisation\], with the convention the $\gamma$-matrices $$\begin{aligned} \label {groupnorgam} tr \gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\end{aligned}$$ and irreducible representations $$\begin{aligned} \label trG_i G_j=2 \delta_{ij}. \end{aligned}$$ Essentially, we are setting normalization constants for the matrix in \[vertex\], connect and can be viewed as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. ${\mathcal L}_{f}$ contains sums over matrix elements for each and $a$, which determine the coupling constant; only polarizations $\mu$ have a interpretation, while gauge and Lorentz demand unique value. field admits coupling constants for vertex, which are obtained experimentally. The theoretical assignment of $g$ complements this theory. In comparing the fermion with the we find the are only in the the gauge groups, whereas the configuration elementary for both types of field. In general, additional fermion $\beta$ independent of $A^a_\mu$ corresponds to W_F=\sum |\beta \rangle\langle \beta| =1_F$, a unit operator in the vertex, not contributing to the coupling constant. This is the flavor’s case. However, two consistent coupling definitions such a kind operator in fermion Thus, e.g., SU(2)_L$ generators in a grand-unified theory such as $SU(5)$ are constructed their lepton ($l$) and baryon ($b$) components as $G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(G_{SU(2)_Lb}\times 1_{SU(3)})$, a operator in color (leptons are color singlets); does commute with some $SU(5)$
 for the group-representation Matrices, alL of whIch ConTaIn opEratOrs acting upon tHE spiN-1/2 particles, which leads to The idEnTIficATiOn $$\begIn{alignED}
\lABEl  {iDeNtI}
  g\rIgHTaRrow 2\sQrt{ \Frac{1}{ N}}.\enD{aligned}$$ ThE noRmAlization $N$ is CAlCulated as iN Eq. \[NormalisatioN\], wiTh the cOnVenTIon foR thE $\gammA$-matriCEs $$\begiN{aligned}
\lAbEL  {groupNOrgam}
 tr  \GAMmA_\mu\gAmma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\end{aliGNeD}$$ And irreducible RepresEnTAtIONs $$\bEgiN{aligned}
\laBeL  {grouPNor}
 trG_i g_J=2 \dELTA_{ij}.
 \ENd{aligned}$$ EsseNtially, we arE SetTing noRmAliZAtion cOnstaNtS For The matrix elEmenTs in Eq. \[verTex\], whiCH connecT RepreseNtatioNs, aNd cAn be VIeWeD as clEBscH-goRdaN CoeFficientS. ${\mAtHcal L}_{F}$ conTAINS sumS ovEr maTrix eLements for eacH $\mu$ And $a$, WHicH deteRmine The cOuPling ConstaNt; onlY tWo polarizations $\Mu$ haVe a physicAl-sTaTe iNtErpreTAtion, wHilE gaUge and LOrentz iNVarIaNCE DeMand a unique value. QuAnTUM fIeld theoRy admiTS aRbITrary couPlIng ConsTANts foR a veRTeX, which arE obtaiNEd ExPerimenTaLly. The ThEorEtiCal asSIgnmEnt of $g$ ComplemeNts thIS theory.

In compaRIng the fermion STaTES wITh thE veCtor ones, we fInd tHAt thE latTEr Are COmposIte onLy IN tHE Lorentz and the gauge GrOups, whEreas The configuratIon variablE $X$ IS elementAry fOR bOTh types of field. in genEral, an addiTIonal ferMion iNdex $\beta$ IndependeNT Of $A^a_\mu$ coRreSpoNds To $\hAT w_F=\Sum |\beta \rangle\LANgle \BeTa| =1_F$, a uniT opErator pResEnt In tHe vErTex, not conTributinG tO tHe CoUplIng coNStant. ThiS iS thE fLavOr’s caSE. HowevEr, theRe arE tWo COnsIstent cOUpLINg deFiNiTionS whEn Such a Kind OF opErator aCts in a ferMioN SubsPaCe. thus, e.g., $ Su(2)_L$ generators iN a Grand-unifiEd TheOry sucH AS $SU(5)$ are coNstructed with their leptoN ($L$) and barYon ($B$) compOnenTs as $G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(g_{SU(2)_lb}\timeS 1_{SU(3)})$, WIth $1_{SU(3)}$ a ProjecTion oPeRatOR In colOR SpAce (LePtons are coLOR siNgletS); $1_{Su(3)}$ doeS not comMute with some $SU(5)$
 for the group-representat ion matric es, a llofwh ichcont ain operatorsa ctin g upon the spin-1/2 pa rticl es ,  whi c hleads  to the id e n tif ic at ion  $ $ \b egin{ ali gned}
\ label  {id ent i} 
  g\rightar r ow  2\sqrt{ \ fra c{1}{ N}}.\e nd{ aligne d} $$T he no rma lizat ion $N $  is ca lculatedas in Eq. \[norma l i sa tion \], with the conv e nt i on for the $\g amma$- ma t ri c e s $ $\b egin{align ed }
\la b el  {gr o up n o r gam } 
 tr  \gamma_ \mu\gamma_\ n u=4  g_{\m u\ nu} , \end{a ligne d} $ $ a nd irreduci blerepresent ations $$\begi n {aligne d}
\la bel   { grou p no r} 
 t rG _ i G _ j= 2 \ d elt a_{ij}. \ en d{ali gned } $ $ Esse nti ally , weare setting n orm aliz a tio n con stant s fo rthe m atrixeleme nt s in Eq. \[vert ex\] , which c onn ec t r ep resen t ations , a ndcan bevieweda s C le b s c h- Gordan coefficient s. $ {\ mathcalL}_{f} $  c on t ains sum sove r ma t r ix el emen t sfor each  $\mu$ an d$a$, wh ic h dete rm ine  th e cou p ling  const ant; onl y two polarizations$ \mu$ have a p h ys i c al - stat e i nterpretati on,w hile  gau g eand Loren tz in va r ia n ce demand a uniqueva lue. Q uantu m field theor y admits a r b i trary co upli n gc onstants for a  vert ex, whicha re obtai ned e xperimen tally. Th e theoreti cal  as sig nme n t  o f $g$ complem e n ts t hi s theor y.
In com par ing  th e f er mion stat es withth eve ct orones, we findth atth e l atter are co mposi te o nl yi n t he Lore n tz a nd t he  g auge  gr ou ps, w here a s t he conf iguration  va r iabl e$x $ is el ementary forbo th types o ffie ld. In g eneral,an additional fermion i n dex $\b eta $ ind epen dent of $ A^a _\mu$cor r espond s to $ \hatW_ F=\ s u m |\b e t a\ra ng le\langle\ b eta | =1_ F$ , aunit op erator present int hevertex, not c ont ribu t i ng  to th e  co up l ing c onstant. This i s the flav or ’ scase. Howe v er,  t here ar e two c onsis t ent cou pling def initionswh en s u c h a  kind of o peratoracts in a fermi o nsubsp ace . Thus ,e.g ., $SU(2)_ L $ g enera tors i na gran d-uni fi ed theor y such as $SU(5)$ are c onstru ctedwit h their l ept o n ( $l$) andbary on ($b$) c omp one nts a s $ G _{SU( 2)_L l }+ (G_ { SU(2) _Lb} \ times 1_{ S U( 3)} ) $ ,with $1_{SU ( 3 ) }$a pro jec t ion op erat or in color space (leptons are c olor s ing let s ); $ 1_ {SU(3)}$ doesnot  c o m mute wit hsome $SU(5) $
 for_the group-representation_matrices, all of which_contain operators_acting_upon the_spin-1/2_particles, which leads_to the identification_$$\begin{aligned}
\label  {identi}
 _g\rightarrow 2\sqrt{ \frac{1}{_N}}.\end{aligned}$$_The normalization $N$ is calculated as in Eq. \[normalisation\], with the convention for the_$\gamma$-matrices_$$\begin{aligned}
\label _{groupnorgam}
_tr_ \gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu=4 g_{\mu\nu},\end{aligned}$$ and irreducible_representations $$\begin{aligned}
\label  {groupnor}
 trG_i_G_j=2 \delta_{ij}.
_\end{aligned}$$ Essentially, we are setting normalization constants for_the_matrix elements in_Eq. \[vertex\], which connect representations, and can be viewed_as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. ${\mathcal L}_{f}$ contains_sums over matrix_elements_for_each $\mu$ and $a$,_which determine the coupling constant; only_two polarizations $\mu$ have a physical-state_interpretation, while gauge and Lorentz invariance demand_a unique value. Quantum field theory_admits arbitrary coupling constants for_a vertex,_which are obtained experimentally. The_theoretical assignment of_$g$ complements_this theory.

In comparing_the fermion states with the vector_ones, we find_that the latter are composite only_in_the Lorentz and_the_gauge_groups, whereas_the configuration variable_$x$_is elementary_for_both types of field. In general,_an_additional fermion index $\beta$ independent of $A^a_\mu$_corresponds to $\hat W_F=\sum_|\beta_\rangle\langle \beta| =1_F$, a_unit operator present in the_vertex, not contributing to the coupling_constant. This_is the_flavor’s case. However, there are two consistent coupling definitions when such_a kind of operator acts in_a fermion subspace. Thus,_e.g., $_SU(2)_L$_generators in a_grand-unified_theory such_as $SU(5)$ are constructed with their lepton_($l$) and_baryon ($b$) components as $G_{SU(2)_Ll}+(G_{SU(2)_Lb}\times 1_{SU(3)})$,_with $1_{SU(3)}$ a projection_operator_in color space (leptons are color_singlets); $1_{SU(3)}$ does not commute with_some $SU(5)$