 For dust in the supernova’s host galaxy, we infer the extinction from the reddening of each supernova’s light curve.

However, the slope of differential reddening, characterized in the @cardelli89 extinction model by the parameter $R_V$, may vary. The nominal value of $R_V$ for the Milky Way is $3.1$, but different lines of sight within our galaxy have values of $R_V$ that vary from $2.1$ to $5.1$. Studies of $R_V$ in other galaxies have been more limited because we lack sources of known color and luminosity with which to probe the dust.

Because we use the supernova rest-frame $B-V$ color to determine the reddening of each [SN Ia]{}, and the distance modulus to a supernova is corrected by a value approximately three times the inferred reddening, extinction correction magnifies any source of systematic error in a supernova’s observed effective color. Systematic color errors can result from photometry errors, redshift-dependent K-correction errors, and evolution in the colors of supernovae.

Using the IR-emission maps of the Galaxy from the all-sky COBE/DIRBE and IRAS/ISSA maps, SFD have estimated the dust column density around the sky, which can then be translated to a color excess. This analysis has largely superseded the work of @burstein78, who used radio HI measurements and a relationship between gas and extinction to estimate the color excess across the sky. @burstein03 has reanalyzed the IR and HI measurements and finds that Milky Way extinctions are more precisely derived using the IR method. However, @burstein03 still finds a discrepant value for extinction at the poles, with SFD providing extinctions that are $E(B-V)=0.02$ mag higher than what the HI measurements indicate. @burstein03 suggests as a possible explanation for the discrepancy that SFD may predict too large an extinction in areas with high gas-to-dust ratios. @finkbeiner99 precisely estimated their sensitivities to these systematics and concluded they had controlled them to $0.01$ mag. The ESSENCE program targets fields at high Galactic latitude to minimize Galactic extinction. Although nearby and distant [SNe Ia]{}are both affected by the assumed Milky Way extinction, the nearby objects are observed in $B-V$, whereas the $
For dust in the supernova ’s host galaxy, we infer the extinction from the reddening of each supernova ’s faint curvature. 

 However, the slope of differential reddening, characterized in the @cardelli89 extinction model by the argument $ R_V$, may vary. The nominal value of $ R_V$ for the Milky Way is $ 3.1 $, but different channel of sight within our galaxy suffer values of $ R_V$ that vary from $ 2.1 $ to $ 5.1$. Studies of $ R_V$ in early galaxies have been more limited because we lack sources of know color and luminosity with which to probe the dust. 

 Because we use the supernova rest - frame $ bacillus - V$ color to determine the reddening of each [ SN   Ia ] { }, and the distance modulus to a supernova is corrected by a value approximately three time the inferred reddening, extinction correction magnifies any source of systematic mistake in a supernova ’s observed effective color. Systematic color errors can leave from photometry errors, redshift - dependent K - correction errors, and development in the color of supernovae. 

 Using the IR - emission maps of the Galaxy from the all - sky COBE / DIRBE and IRAS / ISSA maps, SFD have estimated the dust column density around the sky, which can then be translated to a semblance excess. This analysis has largely supplant the workplace of @burstein78, who use radio HI measurements and a relationship between gas and extinction to estimate the color excess across the sky. @burstein03 has reanalyzed the IR and HI measurements and line up that Milky Way extinctions are more precisely derived using the IR method. However, @burstein03 still finds a discrepant value for extinction at the pole, with SFD providing extinctions that are $ E(B - V)=0.02 $   mag higher than what the HI measurements indicate. @burstein03 suggests as a potential explanation for the discrepancy that SFD may bode excessively large an extinction in areas with high accelerator - to - dust ratios. @finkbeiner99 precisely estimated their sensitivity to these systematics and concluded they had controlled them to $ 0.01 $   mag. The ESSENCE program targets field at gamey Galactic latitude to minimize Galactic extinction. Although nearby and distant [ SNe   Ia]{}are both affect by the assumed Milky Way extinction, the nearby object are observed in $ barn - V$, whereas the $
 Fog dust in the supernova’s host galaxy, we infer vhe extjnction wrom the reddening of each snperbova’s light curve.

However, thd slope ov differwntiel reddening, chaczcterizcb in fme @caxdxlli89 extinction model by dhe parameter $S_V$, mcy vary. The nominal value of $R_V$ for ehe Milly Way is $3.1$, but dyffegegt ljnes of sight within our galaxy habe valuts of $R_V$ that vary from $2.1$ to $5.1$. Studies of $R_V$ ij otjer galaxies have heen more lumitqe because we lack sourbzs of known color and luminosity with whicf to 'robe the dosf.

Bfwause we usx the fupernova rest-frame $T-V$ colot to determine thx reedening of each [SN Ia]{}, end the distance modolus to a vu'ernova is corrected vy a vanue dppruzimxtemy tgree tlmea the infedred reddenung, extinction corrtctyin magnifies zny sotrse of systematic error in a supernova’s mbssrved effective color. Ststematic color errord can restlt from photometry errors, redshift-dependent K-corsectikv exvjfw, wnd evolution in the colors of supernovae.

Usind tne IR-emission mais of the Galaxy ftol yre all-sky COBG/DIRBE chd IRAS/ISSA maps, SFD have eftimared the dtst volumn density around the sjy, which can rhen be translated to a color excgss. Thos analysis has largely supsrseded the work of @gjrstein78, who used racim HI measurements and a rejationshi' betceen gas and extinstion to edtimaba the color excess acrods the sky. @bkrstein03 has reanalyzed the IR aiv HI measuremgntv atd finds that Milky Way exeinctions are kore przciselh derived lsing the IR method. Rowever, @burstaln03 still finvs a discwepabt vqlue fof extinction at the poles, with SFD providing extinctlons jhzt are $E(B-V)=0.02$ mag hnyhtr than what the HI mewslrekegds indicate. @tursgeiv03 suggdsts as a pirsibke explanation for tve djscrepancy that SFC iay preduct too jarge an extimction in areas wiuh higi gas-tu-dust rajios. @finkbeiner99 precisely estimzted theig scnsitivities eo tmese systematies and concluded they had controlled then to $0.01$ mag. The ESSENXE program targets yitlds at high Jalactyc latituge to minimize Galacric extinction. Aluhough nearby and distaht [SNe Ha]{}are both affected by the assumed Milky Way extinction, the nearby objects are obserteq in $B-V$, whedeas the $
For dust in the supernova’s host galaxy, the from the of each supernova’s of reddening, characterized in @cardelli89 extinction model the parameter $R_V$, may vary. The value of $R_V$ for the Milky Way is $3.1$, but different lines of within our galaxy have values of $R_V$ that vary from $2.1$ to $5.1$. of in galaxies been more limited because we lack sources of known color and luminosity with which to probe dust. Because we use the supernova rest-frame $B-V$ to determine the reddening each [SN Ia]{}, and the modulus a supernova corrected a approximately three times inferred reddening, extinction correction magnifies any source of systematic error in a supernova’s observed effective color. Systematic errors can photometry errors, K-correction and in the colors Using the IR-emission maps of the all-sky COBE/DIRBE and IRAS/ISSA maps, SFD have estimated dust column around the sky, which can then translated to a color excess. This analysis has superseded the work of @burstein78, who used radio HI measurements and a relationship between gas to estimate the color across the sky. has the and measurements and that Milky Way extinctions are more precisely derived using the IR However, @burstein03 still finds a discrepant value for extinction at with providing extinctions that $E(B-V)=0.02$ mag higher than the measurements indicate. @burstein03 suggests possible for SFD predict large an extinction in with high gas-to-dust ratios. @finkbeiner99 estimated their sensitivities to had controlled them to $0.01$ mag. The ESSENCE targets fields at high Galactic latitude to Galactic extinction. Although nearby and distant [SNe Ia]{}are both affected by the Milky Way nearby objects are observed in $B-V$, whereas the
 For dust in the supernova’s hosT galaxy, we iNfer tHe eXtiNcTion From The reddening of EAch sUpernova’s light curve.

HowEver, tHe SLope OF dIfferEntial rEDdENIng, ChArActErIZeD in thE @caRdelli89 eXtinction mOdeL bY the parameteR $r_V$, May vary. The NomInal value of $R_v$ foR the MiLkY WaY Is $3.1$, but DifFerenT lines OF sight Within our GaLAxy havE Values oF $r_v$ tHat vAry from $2.1$ to $5.1$. Studies oF $r_V$ IN other galaxies Have beEn MOrE LImiTed Because we lAcK sourCEs of knoWN cOLOR anD Luminosity witH which to proBE thE dust.

BEcAusE We use tHe supErNOva Rest-frame $B-V$ ColoR to determIne the REddeninG Of each [Sn Ia]{}, and The DisTancE MoDuLus To A SupERnOva IS coRrected bY a VaLue apProxIMATEly tHreE timEs the Inferred reddeNinG, extINctIon coRrectIon mAgNifieS any soUrce oF sYstematic error iN a suPernova’s oBseRvEd eFfEctivE Color. SYstEmaTic coloR errors CAn rEsULT FrOm photometry errors, ReDSHiFt-dependEnt K-coRReCtIOn errors, AnD evOlutION in thE colORs Of supernOvae.

UsINg ThE IR-emisSiOn maps Of The galAxy frOM the All-sky cOBE/DIRBe and IraS/ISSA maps, SFD hAVe estimated thE DuST CoLUmn dEnsIty around thE sky, WHich Can tHEn Be tRAnslaTed to A cOLoR Excess. This analysis hAs LargelY supeRseded the work Of @burstein78, WHO Used radiO HI mEAsURements and a relAtionShip betweeN Gas and exTinctIon to estImate the cOLOr excess AcrOss The Sky. @BURsTein03 has reanalYZEd thE Ir and HI mEasUrementS anD fiNds ThaT MIlky Way exTinctionS aRe MoRe PreCiselY Derived uSiNg tHe iR mEthod. hOwever, @BurstEin03 sTiLl FIndS a discrEPaNT ValuE fOr ExtiNctIoN at thE polES, wiTh SFD prOviding exTinCTionS tHaT are $E(B-V)=0.02$ Mag higher than WhAt the HI meaSuRemEnts inDICate. @bursTein03 suggests as a possible EXplanatIon For thE disCrepancy tHat sFD may PreDIct too Large aN extiNcTioN IN areaS WItH hiGh Gas-to-dust rATIos. @FinkbEiNer99 pReciselY estimated their senSItiVities to these SysTemaTICs And COnCLudEd THey HAD controlled them To $0.01$ mag. The ESsEncE Program tarGEts FiElds at hIgh GalaCtic lATitude tO minimize galactic eXtInctION. AlThough nearBy and disTant [SNe Ia]{}ARe botH AfFecteD by The assUmEd MIlky WAy extiNCtiOn, the Nearby ObJects aRe obsErVed in $B-V$, wHereas the $
 For dust in the supernova ’s host ga laxy,  we  in fe r th e ex tinction fromt he r eddening of each super nova’ sl ight cu rve.
Howeve r ,t h e s lo pe  of  d i ff erent ial  redden ing, chara cte ri zed in the @ c ar delli89 ex tin ction modelbythe pa ra met e r $R_ V$,  mayvary.T he nom inal valu eo f $R_V $  for th e Mi lkyWay is $3.1$, but di f ferent lines o f sigh tw it h i n o urgalaxy hav evalue s  of $R_ V $t h a t v a ry from $2.1$  to $5.1$.S tud ies of  $ R_V $  in ot her g al a xie s have been  mor e limited  becau s e we la c k sourc es ofkno wncolo r  a nd  lu mi n osi t ywit h  wh ich to p ro be  thedust . B ecau sewe u se th e supernova r est -fra m e $ B-V$color  tode termi ne the  redd en ing of each [SN  Ia] {}, and t hedi sta nc e mod u lus to  asup ernovais corr e cte db y avalue approximatel yt h re e timesthe in f er re d  reddeni ng , e xtin c t ion c orre c ti on magni fies a n yso urce of  s ystema ti c e rro r ina  sup ernova ’s obser ved e f fective color. Systematic co l or e rr o rs c anresult from  pho t omet ry e r ro rs, redsh ift-d ep e nd e nt K-correction err or s, and  evol ution in thecolors ofs u p ernovae. 

Us i ng the IR-emissio n map s of the G a laxy fro m the  all-sky  COBE/DIR B E  and IRA S/I SSA  ma ps, S FD  have estimat e d  the  d ust col umn  densit y a rou ndthe  s ky, which  can the nbe  t ra nsl atedt o a colo rexc es s.Thisa nalysi s has  lar ge ly sup erseded th e work  o f@bur ste in 78, w ho u s edradio H I measure men t s an darelatio nship between  g as and ext in cti on toe s timate t he color excess acrosst he sky.  @b urste in03  has rean aly zed th e I R  and H I meas ureme nt s a n d  find s th atMi lky Way ex t i nct ionsar e mo re prec isely derived usin g  th e IR method.How ever , @b urs t ei n 03st i llf i nds a discrepan t value fo re xt inction at the  p oles, w ith SFD  prov i ding ex tinctions  that are  $ E(B- V ) =0. 02$ mag hi gher tha n what th e  HI m e as ureme nts  indic at e.@burs tein03 sug gests  as apo ssible  expl an ation fo r the discrepancy thatSFD ma y pre dic t too lar gea n e xtinction  inareas with  hi ghgas-t o-d u st ra tios .  @ fin k beine r99p reciselye st ima t e dtheir sensi t i v iti es to  th e se sys tema tics and conclude d  they had cont roll e d  th emt o $0 .0 1$ mag. The ES SEN CE p rogram t ar gets fields  at high  G a lacti c lati tude t o minim i z eG alacti c ex tin ction. Al tho ug h  nearby  a nd distan t [S Ne  Ia]{} are bo t h af f e cted by the assu med M i l ky Wa y  ex tinct io n, then earb y objectsare observe d in $ B-V$ , whe reas th e$
 For_dust in_the supernova’s host galaxy,_we infer_the_extinction from_the_reddening of each_supernova’s light curve.

However,_the slope of differential_reddening, characterized in_the_@cardelli89 extinction model by the parameter $R_V$, may vary. The nominal value of $R_V$_for_the Milky_Way_is_$3.1$, but different lines of_sight within our galaxy have_values of_$R_V$ that vary from $2.1$ to $5.1$. Studies_of_$R_V$ in other_galaxies have been more limited because we lack sources_of known color and luminosity with_which to probe_the_dust.

Because_we use the supernova_rest-frame $B-V$ color to determine the_reddening of each [SN Ia]{}, and the_distance modulus to a supernova is corrected_by a value approximately three times_the inferred reddening, extinction correction_magnifies any_source of systematic error in_a supernova’s observed_effective color._Systematic color errors_can result from photometry errors, redshift-dependent_K-correction errors, and_evolution in the colors of supernovae.

Using_the_IR-emission maps of_the_Galaxy_from the_all-sky COBE/DIRBE and_IRAS/ISSA_maps, SFD_have_estimated the dust column density around_the_sky, which can then be translated to_a color excess. This_analysis_has largely superseded the_work of @burstein78, who used_radio HI measurements and a relationship_between gas_and extinction_to estimate the color excess across the sky. @burstein03 has reanalyzed_the IR and HI measurements and_finds that Milky Way_extinctions are_more_precisely derived using_the_IR method._However, @burstein03 still finds a discrepant value_for extinction_at the poles, with SFD providing_extinctions that are $E(B-V)=0.02$ mag_higher_than what the HI measurements indicate._@burstein03 suggests as a possible explanation_for the discrepancy that SFD_may_predict_too large an extinction in_areas with high gas-to-dust ratios. @finkbeiner99_precisely estimated their_sensitivities to these systematics and concluded they_had_controlled them to $0.01$ mag. The ESSENCE_program_targets fields at high Galactic latitude_to_minimize_Galactic extinction. Although nearby and_distant [SNe Ia]{}are both affected by the_assumed Milky Way extinction, the nearby objects are observed_in $B-V$, whereas_the $