k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size estimates for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic element inside $\Omega$ for test $T_1$ of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](a) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size estimates for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic element inside $\Omega$ for test $T_2$ of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f01.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size estimates for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic element inside $\Omega$ for test $T_2$ of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f10.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

Three–dimensional case {#subsec:3D}
----------------------

The first part of this subsection is devoted to the extension to the 3–D case of the numerical simulations given in \[subsec:2D\]. In the second part, we shall investigate on the effect of the oscillation character of the Neumann data on the upper bound of size inclusion.

Similarly to the 2–D case, a first series of numerical simulations has been performed on an electrical conductor of cubic shape, of side $
k=10 $ (b).[]{data - label="fig: T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_piu_teoriche.eps " fig:"){width="6cm"}\ 

! [ Numerical size estimates for inclusions of general condition generate from a generic element inside $ \Omega$ for test $ T_1 $ of Figure \[fig: Test numerici\_2D\](a) ($ 21 \times 21 $ FE mesh topology, $ d_0=2 
 $ ): $ k=0.1 $ (a), $ k=10 $ (b).[]{data - label="fig: T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teoriche.eps " fig:"){width="6cm"}\ 

! [ Numerical size estimates for inclusion of cosmopolitan shape generated from a generic element inside $ \Omega$ for test $ T_2 $ of Figure \[fig: Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($ 21 \times 21 $ FE net, $ d_0=2 
 $ ): $ k=0.1 $ (a), $ k=10 $ (b).[]{data - label="fig: T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f01.eps " fig:"){width="6cm"}\ 

! [ Numerical size estimates for inclusion body of general shape generated from a generic element inside $ \Omega$ for test $ T_2 $ of Figure \[fig: Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($ 21 \times 21 $ iron mesh, $ d_0=2 
 $ ): $ k=0.1 $ (a), $ k=10 $ (b).[]{data - label="fig: T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f10.eps " fig:"){width="6cm"}\ 

 Three – dimensional case { # subsec:3D } 
 ---------------------- 

 The first function of this subsection is devoted to the extension to the 3 – D font of the numerical simulation given in \[subsec:2D\ ]. In the second part, we shall investigate on the effect of the oscillation character of the Neumann datum on the upper bound of size inclusion. 

 Similarly to the 2 – D case, a first series of numeric simulations has been performed on an electrical conductor of cubic shape, of side $
k=10$ (b).[]{fata-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_plu_teoriche.eps "fiy:"){qidth="6ck"}\

![Numerjcal sizd estimates for inclusions oh geberal shape generated from x generic element insmde $\Omega$ for test $T_1$ of Nngure \[nig:Tevv numerici\_2D\](a) ($21 \tlmes 21$ FE mevh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{ddtx-lcbel="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){ridth="6cm"}\

![Mulerical size eftimsees ror inclusions of general shape geherated from a generoc element inside $\Omega$ fog tedt $T_2$ of Figure \[fig:Hest numerixi\_2D\](b) ($21 \times 21$ FE mdsh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-labem="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f01.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Nuoericcl size estumqted for inclusmons os general shape genesated ftom a generic clemeit ibside $\Omega$ for test $V_2$ of Figure \[fig:Test gumerici\_2D\](t) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $j=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{dada-lacwl="fkg:T2_2S_sip"}](T2_2S_shp_f10.eos "hig:"){width="6cm"}\

Tgree–dimensiinal case {#subsec:3D}
----------------------

Tht fygxt part of tgis sufsqction is devoted to the extension to tve 3–S case of the numerical simulations given in \[subsec:2D\]. Yn the second part, we shall investigate on the efxect kw tkc uwclllation character of the Neumann data on the hpker bound of size inclusion.

Somllstly to the 2–D cxse, a yjrat series of numerlcal siiulatuons has feen performed on an electrical conductor oy cybic shape, of side $
k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\ ![Numerical size estimates for general generated from generic element inside Figure numerici\_2D\](a) ($21 \times FE mesh, $d_0=2 $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\ ![Numerical estimates for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic element inside $\Omega$ test $T_2$ of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 $): (a), (b).[]{data-label="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f01.eps ![Numerical estimates for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic element inside $\Omega$ for test $T_2$ Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](b) ($21 \times 21$ FE mesh, $): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ "fig:"){width="6cm"}\ Three–dimensional case {#subsec:3D} ---------------------- first of this is to extension to the case of the numerical simulations given in \[subsec:2D\]. In the second part, we shall investigate on the of the of the data the bound of size to the 2–D case, a first simulations has been performed on an electrical conductor cubic shape, side $
k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_Piu_teorichE.eps "fIg:"){wIdtH="6cM"}\

![NumEricAl size estimateS For iNclusions of general shapE geneRaTEd frOM a GenerIc elemeNT iNSIde $\omEgA$ foR tESt $t_1$ of FiGurE \[fig:TesT numerici\_2D\](A) ($21 \tiMeS 21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{DAtA-label="fig:T1_2d_shP"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teOriChe.eps "FiG:"){wiDTh="6cm"}\

![NUmeRical Size esTImates For inclusIoNS of genERal shapE GEnEratEd from a generic eleMEnT Inside $\Omega$ for Test $T_2$ oF FIGuRE \[Fig:tesT numerici\_2D\](B) ($21 \tImes 21$ Fe Mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $K=10$ (B).[]{dATA-LabEL="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shP_f01.eps "fig:"){widTH="6cm"}\

![numeriCaL siZE estimAtes fOr INclUsions of genEral Shape geneRated fROm a geneRIc elemeNt insiDe $\OMegA$ for TEsT $T_2$ Of FIgURe \[fIG:TEst NUmeRici\_2D\](b) ($21 \tiMeS 21$ Fe mesh, $D_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (B).[]{DATA-labEl="fIg:T2_2D_Shp"}](T2_2D_Shp_f10.eps "fig:"){widTh="6cM"}\

ThrEE–diMensiOnal cAse {#sUbSec:3D}
----------------------

THe firsT part Of This subsection iS devOted to the ExtEnSioN tO the 3–D CAse of tHe nUmeRical siMulatioNS giVeN IN \[SuBsec:2D\]. In the second paRt, WE ShAll invesTigate ON tHe EFfect of tHe OscIllaTIOn chaRactER oF the NeumAnn datA On ThE upper bOuNd of siZe IncLusIon.

SiMIlarLy to thE 2–D case, a fIrst sERies of numericaL Simulations haS BeEN PeRFormEd oN an electricAl coNDuctOr of CUbIc sHApe, of Side $
k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="f ig:T1_2D_s hp"}] (T1 _2D _s hp_f 01_p iu_teoriche.ep s  "fi g:"){width="6cm"}\

![ Numer ic a l si z eestim ates fo r  i n c lus io ns  of  g e ne ral s hap e gener ated froma g en eric element in side $\Ome ga$  for test $T _1$  of Fi gu re\ [fig: Tes t num erici\ _ 2D\](a ) ($21 \t im e s 21$F E mesh, $ d_ 0=2
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k = 10$ (b).[]{dat a-labe l= " fi g : T1_ 2D_ shp"}](T1_ 2D _shp_ f 10_piu_ t eo r i c he. e ps "fig:"){wi dth="6cm"}\ 
![ Numeri ca l s i ze est imate sf orinclusionsof g eneral sh ape ge n eratedf rom a g eneric  el eme nt i n si de  $\ Om e ga$ fo r t e st$T_2$ of  F ig ure \ [fig : T e s t nu mer ici\ _2D\] (b) ($21 \tim es21$F E m esh,$d_0= 2 
$ ):  $k=0 .1$ (a ), $k =1 0$ (b).[]{data- labe l="fig:T2 _2D _s hp" }] (T2_2 D _shp_f 01. eps  "fig:" ){width = "6c m" } \ 
! [Numerical size es ti m a te s for in clusio n sof generalsh ape  gen e r atedfrom agenericelemen t  i ns ide $\O me ga$ fo rtes t $ T_2$o f Fi gure \ [fig:Tes t num e rici\_2D\](b)( $21 \times 21 $  F E me s h, $ d_0 =2 
$): $k= 0.1$ (a),  $k= 1 0$  (b ) .[]{d ata-l ab e l= " fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2 _2 D_shp_ f10.e ps "fig:"){wi dth="6cm"} \ Three–di mens i on a l case {#subse c:3D} 
--------- - -------- ----
The fir st part o f this sub sec tio n i s d e v ot ed to the ext e n sion  t o the 3 –Dcase of  th e n ume ric al  simulati ons give nin  \ [s ubs ec:2D \ ]. In th esec on d p art,w e shal l inv esti ga te onthe eff e ct o f th eos cill ati on  char acte r  of  the Ne umann dat a o n  the  u pp er boun d of size inc lu sion.

Sim il arl y to t h e  2–D cas e, a first series of nu m ericalsim ulati onshas beenper formed  on an ele ctrica l con du cto r of cu b i csha pe , of side$ 
k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f01_piu_teoriche.eps_"fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size_estimates for inclusions of_general shape_generated_from a_generic_element inside $\Omega$_for test $T_1$_of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](a)_($21 \times 21$_FE_mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T1_2D_shp"}](T1_2D_shp_f10_piu_teoriche.eps "fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size estimates for inclusions of general_shape_generated from_a_generic_element inside $\Omega$ for test_$T_2$ of Figure \[fig:Test numerici\_2D\](b)_($21 \times_21$ FE mesh, $d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$_(b).[]{data-label="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f01.eps_"fig:"){width="6cm"}\

![Numerical size estimates_for inclusions of general shape generated from a generic_element inside $\Omega$ for test $T_2$_of Figure \[fig:Test_numerici\_2D\](b)_($21_\times 21$ FE mesh,_$d_0=2 
$): $k=0.1$ (a), $k=10$ (b).[]{data-label="fig:T2_2D_shp"}](T2_2D_shp_f10.eps_"fig:"){width="6cm"}\

Three–dimensional case {#subsec:3D}
----------------------

The first part of_this subsection is devoted to the extension_to the 3–D case of the_numerical simulations given in \[subsec:2D\]._In the_second part, we shall investigate_on the effect_of the_oscillation character of_the Neumann data on the upper_bound of size_inclusion.

Similarly to the 2–D case, a_first_series of numerical_simulations_has_been performed_on an electrical_conductor_of cubic_shape,_of side $