E populations have comparable relative type fractions, and we find that our sample has distinct emission type percentiles from all three control samples: red ETGs, blue LTGs and blue ETGs with visual disk features (i.e., bulge-dominated spirals and S0 galaxies). Our sample has a three to six times higher fraction of pure starformers than do red ETGs, but a two to three times lower fraction compared to blue galaxies with disks. Blue ellipticals have an incidence of Seyferts which is on par with that of bulge-dominated blue disks and twice that of either red ETGs or blue LTGs. It is interesting to note that the presence of a substantial bulge in galaxies with cold gas (i.e., from the blue cloud) is linked to a higher incidence of AGN activity as we expect from the well-known correlation between black hole mass and bulge mass [@ferrarese00; @gebhardt00]. In terms of LINER emission, blue ellipticals have a similar makeup as both red and blue bulge-dominated populations. Finally, there is little difference between the Comp fraction of blue ellipticals and the control samples, except for the bulge-dominated blue disk galaxies which have nearly twice as many Comps as their disk-dominated counterparts. Such a difference between late and early-type blue disk galaxies would be expected if Comp emission included an AGN component. Perhaps, galaxies with Comp emission are a mixed bag such that some are traditional SF-AGN composites [@kauffmann03c], while others may be ‘retired’ [i.e., non-star-forming @stasinska08] with non-circumnuclear warm ionized gas [@yan12]. Given the ambiguous nature of Comp types, we hereafter exclude these from AGN subsets. We consider only galaxies with Seyfert emission as definite AGNs, which provides a lower limit of 5–10% for the incidence of blue ellipticals with an AGN, and we include LINERs for an upper limit to AGN fractions with the understanding of their controversial nature. Overall, blue ellipticals are 50% more likely to have strong BPT emission (i.e., sufficient S/N in all four lines) than red ETGs. Clearly, our selection has identified the most active population of elliptical galaxies. Finally, an important caveat is that we use only optical emission lines to determine the presence of an AGN. Studies have shown that optical selection alone may miss an important fraction of AGNs detected at other wavelengths (e.g.,
E populations have comparable relative character fraction, and we find that our sample experience clear-cut emission type percentile from all three control samples: red ETGs, gloomy LTGs and blue ETGs with visual magnetic disk features (i.e., bulge - dominated spiral and S0 galaxy). Our sample has a three to six times higher fraction of pure starformers than make red ETGs, but a two to three times lower fraction compare to blue galaxies with disks. Blue ellipticals experience an incidence of Seyferts which is on par with that of bulge - dominated blue disks and twice that of either red ETGs or aristocratic LTGs. It is interesting to note that the presence of a substantial bulge in galaxies with cold gas (i.e., from the blue cloud) is linked to a higher incidence of AGN activity as we expect from the well - known correlation between black hole mass and bulge mass [ @ferrarese00; @gebhardt00 ]. In terms of LINER emission, gloomy ellipticals have a similar constitution as both crimson and aristocratic bulge - dominated populations. Finally, there is little difference between the Comp fraction of blue ellipticals and the restraint samples, except for the bulge - dominated blue disk galaxies which have closely twice as many Comps as their disk - dominated counterpart. Such a difference between belated and early - type blue disk galaxies would be expected if Comp discharge included an AGN component. Perhaps, galaxy with Comp emission are a mixed bag such that some are traditional SF - AGN composites [ @kauffmann03c ], while others may be ‘ retire ’ [ i.e., non - star - forming @stasinska08 ] with non - circumnuclear warm ionized gas [ @yan12 ]. give the ambiguous nature of Comp types, we hereafter eject these from AGN subsets. We consider only galaxies with Seyfert emission as definite AGNs, which supply a lower terminus ad quem of 5–10% for the incidence of blue ellipticals with an AGN, and we include LINERs for an upper limit to AGN fraction with the understanding of their controversial nature. Overall, blue ellipticals are 50% more likely to experience strong BPT emission (i.e., sufficient S / N in all four lines) than red ETGs. Clearly, our selection has identify the most active population of elliptical galaxies. Finally, an important caveat is that we use merely ocular emission lines to determine the presence of an AGN. Studies have shown that ocular selection alone may miss an significant fraction of AGNs detect at other wavelengths (e.g.,
E plpulations have comparabue relative typg dractimns, ans we fina that our sample has distinrt enissiin type percentiles frum all thgee contril semples: red ETGs, umue LTGs and gpue ZTJs with visual cisk featuses (i.e., bulge-dokivaced spirals and S0 galaxies). Our samplq has a tjree to six tiies nyghed fraction of pure starformers thah do rev ETGs, but a twp to three times lower fraftioj compared to blue galaxies wuth qusks. Blue eluipticals have an incisence of Seyferts which is on pxr wich that of vuoge-fmminated blne dishs and twice that of either red ETGs or bkue LTTs. It is interesting vo note that the prefence of d aubstantial bulge ib galdxiev wigy culd ges (j.e., frol tie blue clohd) is linkee to a higher incidtncq of AGN activjty as wq expect from the well-known correlation befween black hole mass abd bulge mass [@ferrarede00; @gebharqt00]. In terms of LINER emission, blue ellipticals haee a akmioav maywuo as both red and blue bulge-dominated populatyknx. Ninally, there is little difgegemse between thg Comp ydadtion of blue ellioticals and rhe contrjl ssmples, except for the bulge-eominated blle dusk galaxies which have nearlv twicg as msny Comps as their disk-bominafed counteroarts. Sucg a difference begwevn ldte and txrly-type blue dish galaxiew wobld be ebpecjed if Somp emisslon ikwluded an AGN complnent. Parhaps, galwxies with Comp emission are a mixed bag such tvat some arz tradltional SF-AGN cjmposites [@kaufymann03c], wkile oghers may ge ‘reticed’ [i.e., non-stwr-forming @stavlnska08] with nmn-circumguclwar qarm iovkzed gas [@yan12]. Goven the cibigyous nature of Comi typgs, we hereafter ereloee these from SGN sufsvts. Wq consider onny gxlaboes wkth Seyfert dmisxion as definite AGNv, whjch provides a lowrr limit od 5–10% for tre incidence pf blue ellipticald witi an AJN, and we include LINERs for an upper ljmit to AHN nractions witr thc unqerstandiny of their controversial nature. Overall, ulue ellipticals are 50% mire likely to have xurong BPT emixsion (i.e., suffiwient S/N in all four lines) than red EUGs. Clearly, our selectikn has idenhified the most active population of elliptical galaxies. Finally, an imporrant cevqat is that we ise otlv o'tical qmisdmon lines to detegmine the presence of an AGN. Stuvies have vhjwn that optical selection akove may miss av important fraction of ZGNs detrcted at other wavelengths (e.g.,
E populations have comparable relative type fractions, find our sample distinct emission type samples: ETGs, blue LTGs blue ETGs with disk features (i.e., bulge-dominated spirals and galaxies). Our sample has a three to six times higher fraction of pure than do red ETGs, but a two to three times lower fraction compared blue with Blue have an incidence of Seyferts which is on par with that of bulge-dominated blue disks and that of either red ETGs or blue LTGs. is interesting to note the presence of a substantial in with cold (i.e., the cloud) is linked a higher incidence of AGN activity as we expect from the well-known correlation between black hole mass bulge mass In terms LINER blue have a similar both red and blue bulge-dominated populations. little difference between the Comp fraction of blue and the samples, except for the bulge-dominated blue galaxies which have nearly twice as many Comps their disk-dominated counterparts. Such a difference between late and early-type blue disk galaxies would be Comp emission included an component. Perhaps, galaxies Comp are mixed such that are traditional SF-AGN composites [@kauffmann03c], while others may be ‘retired’ [i.e., @stasinska08] with non-circumnuclear warm ionized gas [@yan12]. Given the ambiguous Comp we hereafter exclude from AGN subsets. We only with Seyfert emission as which a 5–10% the of blue ellipticals with AGN, and we include LINERs an upper limit to of their controversial nature. Overall, blue ellipticals are more likely to have strong BPT emission sufficient S/N in all four lines) than red ETGs. Clearly, our selection identified the population of elliptical galaxies. Finally, an important caveat that we use only emission lines to determine the presence of an AGN. have that optical alone may miss important fraction of detected at other
E populations have comparablE relative tYpe frActIonS, aNd we Find That our sample hAS disTinct emission type perceNtileS fROm alL ThRee coNtrol saMPlES: Red eTgs, BluE Ltgs And blUe EtGs with Visual disk FeaTuRes (i.e., bulge-doMInAted spiralS anD S0 galaxies). OuR saMple haS a ThrEE to siX tiMes hiGher frACtion oF pure starFoRMers thAN do red EtgS, bUt a tWo to three times lowER fRAction compared To blue GaLAxIES wiTh dIsks. Blue elLiPticaLS have an INcIDENce OF Seyferts whicH is on par witH ThaT of bulGe-DomINated bLue diSkS And Twice that of EithEr red ETGs Or blue ltGs. It is INterestIng to nOte ThaT the PReSeNce Of A SubSTaNtiAL buLge in galAxIeS with Cold GAS (I.E., froM thE bluE clouD) is linked to a hIghEr inCIdeNce of aGN acTiviTy As we eXpect fRom thE wEll-known correlaTion Between blAck HoLe mAsS and bULge masS [@feRraRese00; @gebHardt00]. In TErmS oF linEr emission, blue ellipTiCALs Have a simIlar maKEuP aS Both red aNd BluE bulGE-DominAted POpUlations. finallY, ThErE is littLe DifferEnCe bEtwEen thE comp FractiOn of blue EllipTIcals and the conTRol samples, excEPt FOR tHE bulGe-dOminated bluE disK GalaXies WHiCh hAVe neaRly twIcE As MAny Comps as their disk-DoMinateD counTerparts. Such a Difference BETWeen late And eARlY-Type blue disk gaLaxieS would be exPEcted if COmp emIssion inCluded an Agn ComponenT. PeRhaPs, gAlaXIEs With Comp emissION are A mIxed bag SucH that soMe aRe tRadItiOnAl SF-AGN coMposites [@KaUfFmAnN03c], wHile oTHers may bE ‘rEtiReD’ [i.e., Non-stAR-formiNg @staSinsKa08] WiTH noN-circumNUcLEAr waRm IoNizeD gaS [@yAn12]. GivEn thE AmbIguous nAture of CoMp tYPes, wE hErEafter eXclude these frOm aGN subsets. we ConSider oNLY galaxieS with Seyfert emission as dEFinite AgNs, Which ProvIdes a loweR liMit of 5–10% fOr tHE incidEnce of Blue eLlIptICAls wiTH An aGN, AnD we include linERS for aN uPper Limit to aGN fractions with thE UndErstanding of tHeiR conTROvErsIAl NAtuRe. oVerALL, blue ellipticalS are 50% more liKeLY tO have stronG bPT EmIssion (i.E., sufficIent S/n In all foUr lines) thAn red ETGs. clEarlY, OUr sElection haS identifIed the mosT ActivE PoPulatIon Of elliPtIcaL galaXies. FiNAllY, an imPortanT cAveat iS that We Use only oPtical emission lines to deTerminE the pResEnce of an AgN. STUdiEs have shoWn thAt optical sEleCtiOn aloNe mAY miss An imPOrTanT FractIon oF aGNs detecTEd At oTHEr Wavelengths (E.G.,
E populations have compara ble relati ve ty pefra ct ions , an d we find that oursample has distinct em issio nt ypep er centi les fro m  a l l  th re econ tr o lsampl es:  red ET Gs, blue L TGs  a nd blue ETGs wi th visualdis k features ( i.e ., bul ge -do m inate d s piral s andS 0 gala xies). Ou rs ampleh as a th r e eto s ix times higher f r ac t ion of pure st arform er s  t h a n d o r ed ETGs, b ut  a tw o  to thr e et i m esl ower fraction  compared t o  bl ue gal ax ies with d isks.  B l ueellipticals  hav e an inci denceo f Seyfe r ts whic h is o n p arwith th at  of  b u lge - do min a ted  blue di sk sand t wice t h a t of  ei ther  redETGs or blueLTG s. I t  is  inte resti ng t onotethat t he pr es ence of a subst anti al bulgeinga lax ie s wit h  coldgas  (i .e., fr om theb lue  c l o u d)  is linked to a hi gh e r  i ncidence  of AG N  a ct i vity aswe  ex pect f rom t he w e ll -known c orrela t io nbetween  b lack h ol e m ass  andb ulge  mass[@ferrar ese00 ;  @gebhardt00]. In terms of L I NE R em i ssio n,blue ellipt ical s  hav e as im ila r  make up as  b o th red and blue bulge- do minate d pop ulations. Fin ally, ther e i s little  dif f er e nce between th e Com p fraction of blueellip ticals a nd the co n t rol samp les , e xce ptf o rthe bulge-dom i n ated  b lue dis k g alaxies  wh ich  ha vene arly twic e as man yCo mp sastheir disk-dom in ate dcou nterp a rts. S uch a  dif fe re n cebetween la t e  and  e ar ly-t ype  b lue d iskg ala xies wo uld be ex pec t ed i fCo mp emis sion included  a n AGN comp on ent . Perh a p s, galax ies with Comp emissiona re a mi xed  bagsuch  that som e a re tra dit i onal S F-AGNcompo si tes [ @kauf f m an n03 c] , while ot h e rsmay b e‘ret ired’ [ i.e., non-star-for m ing  @stasinska08 ] w ithn o n- cir c um n ucl ea r  wa r m  ionized gas [@ yan12]. Gi ve n  t he ambiguo u s n at ure ofComp ty pes,w e herea fter excl ude these  f romA G N s ubsets. We  conside r only ga l axies wi th Se yfe rt emi ss ion  as d efinit e  AG Ns, w hich p ro videsa low er  limit o f 5–10% for the inciden ce ofblueell ipticalswit h  an  AGN, and  weinclude LI NER s f or an  up p er li mitt oAGN fract ions with theu nd ers t a nd ing of thei r c ont rover sia l  natur e. O verall, blue elli p ticals are 50%  mor e lik ely to h av e strong BPT e mis si o n  (i.e.,su fficient S/ N in all  f o ur li nes) t han re d ETGs. C le a rly, o ur s ele ction has  id en t ified t he  m o st act ivepo pulati on ofe llip t i cal galaxies. Fi nally , an im p ort ant c av eat ist hatwe use onl y optical e missio n li nes t o deter mi ne the  pr es ence of an AGN. Stud ies h ave sho wn  tha t o ptical  sel e c tionalon emay  miss ani m po r ta nt fra ctio n ofAG Ns d etected a t  other w ave l engths(e .g. , 
E populations_have comparable_relative type fractions, and_we find_that_our sample_has_distinct emission type_percentiles from all_three control samples: red_ETGs, blue LTGs_and_blue ETGs with visual disk features (i.e., bulge-dominated spirals and S0 galaxies). Our sample_has_a three_to_six_times higher fraction of pure_starformers than do red ETGs,_but a_two to three times lower fraction compared to_blue_galaxies with disks._Blue ellipticals have an incidence of Seyferts which is_on par with that of bulge-dominated_blue disks and_twice_that_of either red ETGs_or blue LTGs. It is interesting_to note that the presence of_a substantial bulge in galaxies with cold_gas (i.e., from the blue cloud)_is linked to a higher_incidence of_AGN activity as we expect_from the well-known_correlation between_black hole mass_and bulge mass [@ferrarese00; @gebhardt00]. In_terms of LINER_emission, blue ellipticals have a similar_makeup_as both red_and_blue_bulge-dominated populations._Finally, there is_little_difference between_the_Comp fraction of blue ellipticals and_the_control samples, except for the bulge-dominated blue_disk galaxies which have_nearly_twice as many Comps_as their disk-dominated counterparts. Such_a difference between late and early-type_blue disk_galaxies would_be expected if Comp emission included an AGN component. Perhaps, galaxies_with Comp emission are a mixed_bag such that some_are traditional_SF-AGN_composites [@kauffmann03c], while_others_may be_‘retired’ [i.e., non-star-forming @stasinska08] with non-circumnuclear warm_ionized gas_[@yan12]. Given the ambiguous nature of_Comp types, we hereafter_exclude_these from AGN subsets. We consider_only galaxies with Seyfert emission as_definite AGNs, which provides a_lower_limit_of 5–10% for the incidence_of blue ellipticals with an AGN,_and we include_LINERs for an upper limit to AGN_fractions_with the understanding of their controversial_nature._Overall, blue ellipticals are 50% more_likely_to_have strong BPT emission (i.e.,_sufficient S/N in all four lines)_than red ETGs. Clearly, our selection has identified the_most active population_of elliptical galaxies. Finally, an_important_caveat_is that we use only optical emission lines to determine_the presence_of an AGN._Studies have shown that optical selection alone may miss an_important fraction of AGNs detected at other_wavelengths (e.g.,