 Cherenkov rings for particle identification. Finally, because the target at LSND includes a drift space and the detector is positioned downstream, LSND is able to also search for the charge conjugate $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e$ oscillation using neutrinos from $\pi^+$ decay in flight [@lsnddif].

3.0 truein

.2 cm

Based on analysis of data collected through April 1998, which was a proton exposure of 2900 C, KARMEN observes 0 candidate events while expecting $2.88 \pm 0.13$ background events. With this data, the KARMEN sensitivity to an LSND-type signal is on the order of 1 event. Figure \[fig:karmen\] shows the limit derived from this experimental observation overlaying the LSND favored region. Also shown is KARMEN’s sensitivity, the limit if only the background expectation were observed.

Noting that KARMEN expects three times more data, a glance at Figure \[fig:karmen\] raises the question, At this rate won’t KARMEN soon rule out LSND? Well, not so fast. The difference between KARMEN’s sensitivity and limit curves merits scrutiny. The limit here benefits from the non-observation of even the expected background. KARMEN will keep running, and assuming that events are seen in the future, which would be more consistent with the background expectation, KARMEN’s limit will necessarily move closer to its sensitivity contour. The sensitivity will improve with more data and with a more sophisticated likelihood analysis. Nevertheless, KARMEN will lack the sensitivity to rule out or confirm LSND.

The situation is illustrated by KARMEN’s recently updated results, based on data gathered through February 1999, about half of its ultimate total. With a new analysis, 8 events are observed, while $7.8\pm 0.5$ background events are expected. For the favored LSND parameters, KARMEN would expect between 1.5 and 5.5 oscillation events. The limit is now weaker than in Figure \[fig:karmen\]. These results encroach on LSND’s allowed region, but they do not rule out LSND. Another experiment will be needed to make a conclusive statement about LSND, and that is where MiniBooNE comes in.

MiniBooNE: experimental design
==============================

MiniBooNE will use a new neutrino beamline
Cherenkov rings for particle identification. Finally, because the prey at LSND include a drift space and the detector is positioned downstream, LSND is able to also research for the charge conjugate $ \nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e$ oscillation practice neutrinos from $ \pi^+$ decay in flight [ @lsnddif ]. 

 3.0 truein 

 .2 cm 

 establish on analysis of data collect through April 1998, which was a proton exposure of 2900 C, KARMEN note 0 candidate events while expecting $ 2.88 \pm 0.13 $ background events. With this data, the KARMEN sensitivity to an LSND - character signal is on the order of 1 event. Figure \[fig: karmen\ ] prove the limit derived from this experimental notice overlaying the LSND favor region. besides shown is KARMEN ’s sensitivity, the limit if only the background arithmetic mean were observed. 

 Noting that KARMEN expects three times more data, a glance at Figure \[fig: karmen\ ] raise the question, At this rate wo n’t KARMEN soon rule out LSND? Well, not so fast. The difference between KARMEN ’s sensitivity and limit curves merits scrutiny. The limit here benefit from the non - observation of even the expected backdrop. KARMEN will observe running, and assuming that events are watch in the future, which would be more consistent with the background expectation, KARMEN ’s limit will inevitably move closer to its sensitivity contour. The sensitivity will improve with more data and with a more sophisticated likelihood analysis. Nevertheless, KARMEN will lack the sensitivity to rule out or confirm LSND. 

 The situation is illustrated by KARMEN ’s recently update results, establish on data gathered through February 1999, about half of its ultimate total. With a new psychoanalysis, 8 events are observed, while $ 7.8\pm 0.5 $ background events are expected. For the favored LSND parameters, KARMEN would expect between 1.5 and 5.5 oscillation consequence. The limit is immediately weaker than in Figure \[fig: karmen\ ]. These results impinge on LSND ’s allowed region, but they do not rule out LSND. Another experiment will be needed to reach a conclusive statement about LSND, and that is where MiniBooNE hail in. 

 MiniBooNE: experimental design 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 MiniBooNE will use a new neutrino beamline
 Chfrenkov rings for particue identification. Finanly, bedause thd target at LSND includes a vrifr spaxe and the detector is positionvd downsteeam, OSND is able to also seadgh fox vhe charge conjogate $\nu_\mu \rhghtarrow \nu_e$ msziplation using neutrinos from $\pi^+$ decwy in fkihht [@lsnddif].

3.0 troein

.2 bm

Fases on analysis of data collected thdough Akril 1998, which was a lroton exposure of 2900 C, KARMFN ohserves 0 candidate events whioe evpecting $2.88 \pm 0.13$ background events. Witg this data, the KARMEN sensitivkty tp an LSND-ti'w slcnal is on vhe orqer of 1 evenb. Figura \[fig:katmen\] shows the likit derived from this ex'erimental observatijn overlafiug the LSND favored rwguon. Anso vhowv is KADMXN’s sensihivmty, the limjt if only rhe background expevtwnoon were obssrved.

Njtyng that KARMEN expects three times mort datz, a glance at Figure \[fit:karmen\] raises the qugstion, At ehis rate won’t KARMEN soon rule out LSND? Well, not so fesg. Tkc aufverence between KARMEN’s sensitivity and limit dutvvs merits scrutinn. The limit here brnffojs from the nov-obserrztjon of even the exoected fackgeound. KARIEN eill keep running, and assumung that eveuts are seen in the fbture, which could ne mote consistent with the yackgrkund expectwtion, KARJDN’s limit will ndcexsdrily move closer to its sqnsitivitb concour. The senxitiviey will imorove with more data and with a more sophlsticated likelihood analysis. Nxtertheless, KATMET wpll lack che seksitivity to ruje out or confnrm LSND.

Che siguation is illustcated by KARIEN’s recently opdated resulvs, based jn dqta tatherea through Februsry 1999, aboun kalf of irs ultimate total. Xith z new analysis, 8 evtnrs are observec, wfilq $7.8\im 0.5$ bwwkground evetts xre rxpecged. For the wavoted LSND parameters, NARMSN would expect beywcen 1.5 and 5.5 oscillaeion events. Tne limit is now wewker vhan ii Figute \[sig:karmen\]. These results encroadh on LSNF’s wllowed regijn, bmt trey do not rule out LSND. Another experiment will ue needed to make a conxlusive statement ayomt LSND, and vhat if where MhniBooNE comes in.

MinuBooNE: experimentsl design
==============================

MiniBooNE wiml use a nea neutrino beamline
Cherenkov rings for particle identification. Finally, because at includes a space and the is to also search the charge conjugate \rightarrow \nu_e$ oscillation using neutrinos from decay in flight [@lsnddif]. 3.0 truein .2 cm Based on analysis of data through April 1998, which was a proton exposure of 2900 C, KARMEN observes candidate while $2.88 0.13$ background events. With this data, the KARMEN sensitivity to an LSND-type signal is on the of 1 event. Figure \[fig:karmen\] shows the limit from this experimental observation the LSND favored region. Also is sensitivity, the if the expectation were observed. that KARMEN expects three times more data, a glance at Figure \[fig:karmen\] raises the question, At this won’t KARMEN out LSND? not fast. difference between KARMEN’s limit curves merits scrutiny. The limit the non-observation of even the expected background. KARMEN keep running, assuming that events are seen in future, which would be more consistent with the expectation, KARMEN’s limit will necessarily move closer to its sensitivity contour. The sensitivity will improve data and with a sophisticated likelihood analysis. KARMEN lack sensitivity rule out confirm LSND. The situation is illustrated by KARMEN’s recently updated results, on data gathered through February 1999, about half of its With new analysis, 8 are observed, while $7.8\pm background are expected. For the parameters, would and oscillation The limit is now than in Figure \[fig:karmen\]. These encroach on LSND’s allowed rule out LSND. Another experiment will be needed make a conclusive statement about LSND, and is where MiniBooNE comes in. MiniBooNE: experimental design ============================== MiniBooNE will use new neutrino
 Cherenkov rings for particle IdentificaTion. FInaLly, BeCausE the Target at LSND inCLudeS a drift space and the deteCtor iS pOSitiONeD downStream, LsnD IS AblE tO aLso SeARcH for tHe cHarge coNjugate $\nu_\mU \riGhTarrow \nu_e$ oscILlAtion using NeuTrinos from $\pi^+$ DecAy in flIgHt [@lSNddif].

3.0 TruEin

.2 cm

based oN AnalysIs of data cOlLEcted tHRough ApRIL 1998, wHich Was a proton exposurE Of 2900 c, kARMEN observes 0 CandidAtE EvENTs wHilE expecting $2.88 \Pm 0.13$ BackgROund eveNTs. wITH thIS data, the KARMEn sensitivitY To aN LSND-tYpE siGNal is oN the oRdER of 1 Event. Figure \[Fig:kArmen\] showS the liMIt derivED from thIs expeRimEntAl obSErVaTioN oVErlAYiNg tHE LSnD favoreD rEgIon. AlSo shOWN IS KARmEN’S senSitivIty, the limit if OnlY the BAckGrounD expeCtatIoN were ObservEd.

NotInG that KARMEN expeCts tHree times MorE dAta, A gLance AT FigurE \[fiG:kaRmen\] raiSes the qUEstIoN, aT ThIs rate won’t KARMEN soOn RULe Out LSND? WEll, not SO fAsT. the diffeReNce BetwEEN KARMeN’s sENsItivity aNd limiT CuRvEs meritS sCrutinY. THe lImiT here BEnefIts froM the non-oBservATion of even the eXPected backgroUNd. karMen wilL keEp running, anD assUMing That EVeNts ARe seeN in thE fUTuRE, which would be more coNsIstent With tHe background eXpectation, karmEN’s limiT wilL NeCEssarily move clOser tO its sensitIVity contOur. ThE sensitiVity will iMPRove with MorE daTa aNd wITH a More sophisticATEd liKeLihood aNalYsis. NevErtHelEss, kARmEn will lack The sensiTiViTy To RulE out oR Confirm LsNd.

ThE sItuAtion IS illusTrateD by KaRmEn’S reCently uPDaTED resUlTs, BaseD on DaTa gatHereD ThrOugh FebRuary 1999, abouT haLF of iTs UlTimate tOtal. With a new aNaLysis, 8 eventS aRe oBserveD, WHile $7.8\pm 0.5$ baCkground events are expectED. For the FavOred LsND pArameters, kARmEN wouLd eXPect beTween 1.5 aNd 5.5 oscIlLatION evenTS. thE liMiT is now weakER ThaN in FiGuRe \[fiG:karmen\]. these results encroaCH on lSND’s allowed rEgiOn, buT THeY do NOt RUle OuT lSNd. aNother experimenT will be neeDeD To Make a conclUSivE sTatemenT about LsND, anD That is wHere MiniBOoNE comes In.

minibOONE: ExperimentAl design
==============================

miniBooNE WIll usE A nEw neuTriNo beamLiNe
 Cherenkov rings for parti cle identi ficat ion . F in ally , be cause the targ e t at  LSND includes a drift  spac ea nd t h edetec tor isp os i t ion ed  d own st r ea m, LS NDis able  to also s ear ch  for the cha r ge  conjugate  $\ nu_\mu \righ tar row \n u_ e$o scill ati on us ing ne u trinos  from $\p i^ + $ deca y  in fli g h t[@ls nddif].

3.0 true i n.2 cm

Based o n anal ys i so f  da tacollectedth rough April 1 9 98 , w hic h  was a proton  exposure o f  29 00 C,KA RME N  obser ves 0  c a ndi date events  whi le expect ing $2 . 88 \pm0 .13$ ba ckgrou ndeve nts. Wi th  th is dat a ,the KAR MEN sens it iv ity t o an L S N D-ty pesign al is  on the order  of  1 e v ent . Fig ure \ [fig :k armen \] sho ws th elimit derived f romthis expe rim en tal  o bserv a tion o ver lay ing the  LSND f a vor ed r e gi on. Also shown isKA R M EN ’s sensi tivity ,  t he limit if  o nly  the b ackgr ound ex pectatio n were ob se rved.
No ting t ha t K ARM EN ex p ects  three  times m ore d a ta, a glance a t  Figure \[fig : ka r m en \ ] ra ise s the quest ion, At t hisr at e w o n’t K ARMEN  s o on rule out LSND? Well ,not so  fast . The differe nce betwee n K ARMEN’ssens i ti v ity and limitcurve s merits s c rutiny.The l imit her e benefit s from the  no n-o bse rva t i on  of even thee x pect ed  backgr oun d. KARM ENwil l k eep  r unning, a nd assum in gth at  ev entsa re seenin  th efut ure,w hich w ouldbe m or ec ons istentw it h theba ck grou ndex pecta tion ,  KA RMEN’slimit wil l n e cess ar il y movecloser to its  s ensitivity  c ont our. T h e  sensiti vity will improve withm ore dat a a nd wi th a  more sop his ticate d l i keliho od ana lysis .Nev e r thele s s ,KAR ME N will lac k the  sens it ivit y to ru le out or confirmL SND .

The situat ion  isi l lu str a te d  by  K A RME N ’ s recently upda ted result s, ba sed on dat a  ga th ered th rough F ebrua r y 1999,  about ha lf of its  u ltim a t e t otal. With  a new a nalysis,8  even t sare o bse rved,wh ile  $7.8 \pm 0. 5 $ b ackgr ound e ve nts ar e exp ec ted. For  the favored LSND param eters,  KARM ENwould exp ect bet ween 1.5and5.5 oscill ati onevent s.T he li miti snow weake r th a n in Figu r e\[f i g :k armen\]. Th e s e  re sults  en c roachon L SND’s allowed reg i on, but they d o no t rul e o u t LS ND . Another expe rim en t will bene eded to mak e a conc lu s ive s tateme nt abo ut LSND , an d  thatis w her e MiniBoo NEco m es in.
M in i BooNE:  exp er imenta l desi g n
== = = ================ ===== = = ===
M ini BooNE  w ill use a ne w neutrino  beamline
 Cherenkov_rings for_particle identification. Finally, because_the target_at_LSND includes_a_drift space and_the detector is_positioned downstream, LSND is_able to also_search_for the charge conjugate $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e$ oscillation using neutrinos from $\pi^+$ decay in_flight_[@lsnddif].

3.0 truein

.2_cm

Based_on_analysis of data collected through_April 1998, which was a_proton exposure_of 2900 C, KARMEN observes 0 candidate events_while_expecting $2.88 \pm_0.13$ background events. With this data, the KARMEN sensitivity_to an LSND-type signal is on_the order of_1_event._Figure \[fig:karmen\] shows the_limit derived from this experimental observation_overlaying the LSND favored region. Also_shown is KARMEN’s sensitivity, the limit if_only the background expectation were observed.

Noting_that KARMEN expects three times_more data,_a glance at Figure \[fig:karmen\]_raises the question,_At this_rate won’t KARMEN_soon rule out LSND? Well, not_so fast. The_difference between KARMEN’s sensitivity and limit_curves_merits scrutiny. The_limit_here_benefits from_the non-observation of_even_the expected_background._KARMEN will keep running, and assuming_that_events are seen in the future, which_would be more consistent_with_the background expectation, KARMEN’s_limit will necessarily move closer_to its sensitivity contour. The sensitivity_will improve_with more_data and with a more sophisticated likelihood analysis. Nevertheless, KARMEN will_lack the sensitivity to rule out_or confirm LSND.

The situation_is illustrated_by_KARMEN’s recently updated_results,_based on_data gathered through February 1999, about half_of its_ultimate total. With a new analysis,_8 events are observed,_while_$7.8\pm 0.5$ background events are expected._For the favored LSND parameters, KARMEN_would expect between 1.5 and_5.5_oscillation_events. The limit is now_weaker than in Figure \[fig:karmen\]. These_results encroach on_LSND’s allowed region, but they do not_rule_out LSND. Another experiment will be_needed_to make a conclusive statement about_LSND,_and_that is where MiniBooNE comes_in.

MiniBooNE: experimental design
==============================

MiniBooNE will use a_new neutrino beamline