 stars orbit the IMBH, the IMBH orbital velocity dominates that of the stars, and an observer looking at such a configuration from afar would see small variations in the stellar velocities when viewed as a group. An example of this is seen in Figure \[fig:com\], for the case in which there is no Bahcall-Wolf cusp or mass distribution.

The important parameter for the endurance of comoving groups is obviously the IMBH mass, because of the implied larger Roche lobe. There is no evidence of any effect of the cusp, but that is because the cusp is a continuous structure seen by the cluster core, instead of a more realistic set of disretized masses. In Figure \[fig:trans0\], the IMBH transports stars into orbits of semimajor axis of roughly $0.2\pc$, but even manages to retain multiple stars further in, whether there is a cusp (left panel) or not (right panel).

Observationally, one would expect that the IMBH is unlikely to be detected directly, but its presence inferred from the gravitational hold it retains on its orbiting stars. In Figure \[fig:com\], we see a typical comoving group from above the inspiral plane. Astrophysical units are used, and the box denotes the IMBH. The radius of this structure is about $\sim 10^{-3}\pc$, is located $0.17\pc$ from the GC, and is being held together by an IMBH of mass $4062 M_{\odot}$. The edge of the Roche envelope of the IMBH lies $0.018\pc$ from the IMBH, so these stars lie deep within the Roche lobe. Further, analysis of the stellar orbital energies shows that these stars are gravitationally bound to the IMBH. Such structures form with some frequency, in this scenario.

Table \[tbl:com\] shows how the different simulation parameters affected the efficiency of transport. Note that for the modelled masses, the minimal semimajor axis ($0.129\pc$) to which $6$ or more stars are transported corresponds to a IMBH Roche lobe of $0.0145\pc$. Two trends are in evidence: only IMBHs more massive than about $4000 M_{\odot}$ can transport multiple stars within $\sim 0.13\pc$, and while massive IMBHs can make such deliveries, they must do so when their eccentricities are
stars orbit the IMBH, the IMBH orbital velocity dominates that of the star, and an perceiver looking at such a configuration from afar would visualize little variations in the stellar speed when viewed as a group. An example of this is seen in Figure   \[fig: com\ ], for the event in which there is no Bahcall - Wolf cusp or mass distribution. 

 The authoritative parameter for the endurance of comoving group is obviously the IMBH mass, because of the implied larger Roche lobe. There is no evidence of any effect of the cusp, but that is because the cusp is a continuous structure attend by the cluster core, rather of a more realistic set of disretized masses. In Figure \[fig: trans0\ ], the IMBH transports star into orbits of semimajor axis of roughly $ 0.2\pc$, but even manages to retain multiple stars far in, whether there is a cusp (left panel) or not (right panel). 

 Observationally, one would ask that the IMBH is unlikely to be detected directly, but its presence inferred from the gravitational hold it retains on its orbiting stars. In Figure   \[fig: com\ ], we attend a typical comoving group from above the inspiral plane. Astrophysical unit are use, and the box denotes the IMBH. The radius of this structure is about $ \sim 10^{-3}\pc$, is located $ 0.17\pc$ from the GC, and is being held in concert by an IMBH of mass $ 4062 M_{\odot}$. The edge of the Roche envelope of the IMBH lies $ 0.018\pc$ from the IMBH, so these stars lie deep within the Roche lobe. Further, analysis of the stellar orbital energies shows that these stars are gravitationally bind to the IMBH. Such social organization form with some frequency, in this scenario. 

 Table   \[tbl: com\ ] shows how the different simulation parameters affect the efficiency of transport. Note that for the modelled masses, the minimal semimajor axis ($ 0.129\pc$) to which $ 6 $ or more stars are transported corresponds to a IMBH Roche lobe of $ 0.0145\pc$. Two trends are in evidence: entirely IMBHs more massive than about $ 4000 M_{\odot}$ can transmit multiple stars within $ \sim 0.13\pc$, and while massive IMBHs can make such delivery, they must do thus when their eccentricities are
 stwrs orbit the IMBH, the IOBH orbital velocity dmminatss that uf the stars, and an observer liokint at such a configuratkon from wfar wouod ste small variatioia in thc stempar reoocities when yiewed as a group. An exam[ld lf this is seen in Figure \[fig:com\], for the caxe in which therg is mj Bagbaol-Wolf cusp or mass distributjon.

The pmportant parametrr for the endurance of colovijg groups is obvioksly the IMVH mwws, because ow the implpzd larger Rkche lobe. There is no evidence uf anv effect of tye fosp, but that is bvcause the cusp is a wontinupus structure xeei by the cluster core, insvead of a more realiftic set mf disretized massew. Un Ficure \[fig:geanr0\], tge IJBH trwns'orts stars into orbitw of semimajor axis os roughly $0.2\pc$, bht eveg ianages to retain multiple stars furtheg in, whether there is a cusp (left panel) or not (rlght panej).

Observationally, one would expect that the IMBH iv unlmkdly tj ve detected directly, but its presence inferred sdok nhe gravitational hold it reyalnx on its orbitkng stcds. In Figure \[fig:com\], wf see a typixal comovyng broup from above the inspirql plane. Astgophtsical units are uded, and the box denoyes the IMBH. The radius of fhis structkre is abkjt $\sim 10^{-3}\pc$, is locxtec $0.17\[c$ from ufe GC, and is beind held tojethex by an KMBH of mafs $4062 M_{\odot}$. Hhe edge of the Roche engelopg of tve IMBH lifs $0.018\pc$ from the IMBH, so these stecs lie deep wotvin the Rocke lobc. Further, analyfis of the steklar oryital dnergies sgows thet these staws are gravitdjionally bounv to the YMBH. Sucy strucgjres form with some frequency, in rhis scenario.

Table \[bbl:coo\] shows how the bnfderent simulatipn oarwmvtecs afsacted the efxicidnch of tfansporu. Nige tnat for the modelled masaes, the minimal sekiiajor axus ($0.129\pc$) to which $6$ or mote stars are transkorted cocrespomds to a IMBH Roche lobe of $0.0145\pc$. Twk trends wre in evidence: onln IMFHs more mcssive than about $4000 M_{\odot}$ can transport mnltiple stars within $\sin 0.13\pc$, and while massnvt IMBHs can meke sush delivesies, they must do so when their eccenuricities are
stars orbit the IMBH, the IMBH orbital that the stars, an observer looking afar see small variations the stellar velocities viewed as a group. An example this is seen in Figure \[fig:com\], for the case in which there is Bahcall-Wolf cusp or mass distribution. The important parameter for the endurance of comoving is the mass, of the implied larger Roche lobe. There is no evidence of any effect of the cusp, that is because the cusp is a continuous seen by the cluster instead of a more realistic of masses. In \[fig:trans0\], IMBH stars into orbits semimajor axis of roughly $0.2\pc$, but even manages to retain multiple stars further in, whether there is cusp (left not (right Observationally, would that the IMBH to be detected directly, but its the gravitational hold it retains on its orbiting In Figure we see a typical comoving group above the inspiral plane. Astrophysical units are used, the box denotes the IMBH. The radius of this structure is about $\sim 10^{-3}\pc$, is from the GC, and being held together an of $4062 The edge the Roche envelope of the IMBH lies $0.018\pc$ from the IMBH, these stars lie deep within the Roche lobe. Further, analysis stellar energies shows that stars are gravitationally bound the Such structures form with in scenario. how different parameters affected the efficiency transport. Note that for the masses, the minimal semimajor or more stars are transported corresponds to a Roche lobe of $0.0145\pc$. Two trends are evidence: only IMBHs more massive than about $4000 M_{\odot}$ can transport multiple within $\sim while massive IMBHs can make such deliveries, they do so when their are
 stars orbit the IMBH, the IMBH oRbital veloCity dOmiNatEs That Of thE stars, and an obsERver Looking at such a configurAtion FrOM afaR WoUld seE small vARiATIonS iN tHe sTeLLaR veloCitIes when Viewed as a gRouP. AN example of thIS iS seen in FigUre \[Fig:com\], for the CasE in whiCh TheRE is no bahCall-WOlf cusP Or mass DistributIoN.

the impORtant paRAMeTer fOr the endurance of cOMoVIng groups is obvIously ThE iMbh MasS, beCause of the ImPlied LArger RoCHe LOBE. ThERe is no evidencE of any effecT Of tHe cusp, BuT thAT is becAuse tHe CUsp Is a continuoUs stRucture seEn by thE Cluster COre, instEad of a MorE reAlisTIc SeT of DiSRetIZeD maSSes. in Figure \[FiG:tRans0\], tHe IMbh TRAnspOrtS staRs intO orbits of semiMajOr axIS of RoughLy $0.2\pc$, bUt evEn ManagEs to reTain mUlTiple stars furthEr in, Whether thEre Is A cuSp (Left pANel) or nOt (rIghT panel).

OBservatIOnaLlY, ONE wOuld expect that the ImBh IS uNlikely tO be detECtEd DIrectly, bUt Its PresENCe infErreD FrOm the graVitatiONaL hOld it reTaIns on iTs OrbItiNg staRS. In FIgure \[fIg:com\], we sEe a tyPIcal comoving grOUp from above thE InSPIrAL plaNe. AStrophysicaL uniTS are Used, ANd The BOx denOtes tHe imBh. the radius of this struCtUre is aBout $\sIm 10^{-3}\pc$, is located $0.17\Pc$ from the Gc, AND is being Held TOgETher by an IMBH of Mass $4062 M_{\Odot}$. The edgE Of the RocHe envElope of tHe IMBH lieS $0.018\PC$ from the iMBh, so TheSe sTARs Lie deep within THE RocHe Lobe. FurTheR, analysIs oF thE stEllAr Orbital enErgies shOwS tHaT tHesE starS Are graviTaTioNaLly Bound TO the IMbH. SucH strUcTuREs fOrm with SOmE FRequEnCy, In thIs sCeNario.

tablE \[Tbl:Com\] showS how the diFfeREnt sImUlAtion paRameters affecTeD the efficiEnCy oF transPORt. Note thAt for the modelled masses, tHE minimaL seMimajOr axIs ($0.129\pc$) to whiCh $6$ oR more sTarS Are traNsportEd corReSpoNDS to a Imbh ROchE lObe of $0.0145\pc$. Two TREndS are iN eVideNce: only iMBHs more massive thAN abOut $4000 M_{\odot}$ can trAnsPort MULtIplE StARs wItHIn $\sIM 0.13\Pc$, and while massiVe IMBHs can MaKE sUch deliverIEs, tHeY must do So when tHeir eCCentricIties are
 stars orbit the IMBH, the  IMBH orbi tal v elo cit ydomi nate s that of thes tars , and an observer look ing a ts ucha  c onfig uration fr o m  af ar  w oul ds ee  smal l v ariatio ns in theste ll ar velocitie s  w hen viewed  as  a group. An  ex ampleof  th i s issee n inFigure \[fig: com\], fo rt he cas e  in whi c h  t here  is no Bahcall-Wo l fc usp or mass di stribu ti o n. The  im portant pa ra meter for the en d u r anc e  of comovinggroups is o b vio usly t he  IM B H mass , bec au s e o f the impli ed l arger Roc he lob e . There is no e videnc e o f a ny e f fe ct  of  t h e c u sp , b u t t hat is b ec au se th e cu s p i s acon tinu ous s tructure seen  by  the clu stercore,  ins te ad of  a mor e rea li stic set of dis reti zed masse s.In  Fi gu re \[ f ig:tra ns0 \],  the IM BH tran s por ts s t ar s into orbits of s em i m aj or axisof rou g hl y$ 0.2\pc$,  b uteven m anage s to re tain mul tiples ta rs  furthe rin, wh et her  th ere i s  a c usp (l eft pane l) or not (right pan e l).

Observat i on a l ly ,  one  wo uld expectthat theIMBH is  un l ikely  to b ed et e cted directly, butit s pres enceinferred from  the gravi t a t ional ho ld i t  r e tains on its o rbiti ng stars.I n Figure  \[fi g:com\],  we see a t ypical c omo vin g g rou p fr om above thei n spir al  plane.  As trophys ica l u nit s a re  used, an d the bo xde no te s t he IM B H. The r ad ius  o f t his s t ructur e isabou t$\ s im10^{-3} \ pc $ ,  islo ca ted$0. 17 \pc$from the  GC, an d is bein g h e ld t og et her byan IMBH of ma ss  $4062 M_{ \o dot }$. Th e edge ofthe Roche envelope of t h e IMBHlie s $0. 018\ pc$ fromthe  IMBH,  so thesestarslie d ee p w i t hin t h e  R och elobe. Furt h e r,analy si s of  the st ellar orbital ener g ies  shows that t hes e st a r sare gr a vit at i ona l l y bound to theIMBH. Such  s t ru ctures for m  wi th  some f requenc y, in this sc enario.
Table \[t bl :com \ ]  sh ows how th e differ ent simul a tionp ar amete rsaffect ed  th e eff icienc y  of  tran sport.  N ote th at fo rthe mode lled masses, the minima l semi major  ax is ($0.12 9\p c $)to which$6$or more st ars  ar e tra nsp o rtedcorr e sp ond s  to a  IMB H  Roche lo b eof$ 0 .0 145\pc$. Tw o t ren ds ar e i n  evide nce:  only IMBHs morem assive than ab out$ 4 000  M_ { \odo t} $ can transpor t m ul t i ple star swithin $\si m 0.13\p c$ ,  andwhilemassiv e IMBHs c an make s uchdel iveries,the ym ust doso  w h en the ir e cc entric itiesa re
 stars_orbit the_IMBH, the IMBH orbital_velocity dominates_that_of the_stars,_and an observer_looking at such_a configuration from afar_would see small_variations_in the stellar velocities when viewed as a group. An example of this is_seen_in Figure \[fig:com\],_for_the_case in which there is_no Bahcall-Wolf cusp or mass_distribution.

The important_parameter for the endurance of comoving groups is_obviously_the IMBH mass,_because of the implied larger Roche lobe. There is_no evidence of any effect of_the cusp, but_that_is_because the cusp is_a continuous structure seen by the_cluster core, instead of a more_realistic set of disretized masses. In Figure_\[fig:trans0\], the IMBH transports stars into_orbits of semimajor axis of_roughly $0.2\pc$,_but even manages to retain_multiple stars further_in, whether_there is a_cusp (left panel) or not (right_panel).

Observationally, one would_expect that the IMBH is unlikely_to_be detected directly,_but_its_presence inferred_from the gravitational_hold_it retains_on_its orbiting stars. In Figure \[fig:com\], we_see_a typical comoving group from above the_inspiral plane. Astrophysical units_are_used, and the box_denotes the IMBH. The radius_of this structure is about $\sim_10^{-3}\pc$, is_located $0.17\pc$_from the GC, and is being held together by an IMBH_of mass $4062 M_{\odot}$. The edge_of the Roche envelope_of the_IMBH_lies $0.018\pc$ from_the_IMBH, so_these stars lie deep within the Roche_lobe. Further,_analysis of the stellar orbital energies_shows that these stars_are_gravitationally bound to the IMBH. Such_structures form with some frequency, in_this scenario.

Table \[tbl:com\] shows how the_different_simulation_parameters affected the efficiency of_transport. Note that for the modelled_masses, the minimal_semimajor axis ($0.129\pc$) to which $6$ or_more_stars are transported corresponds to a_IMBH_Roche lobe of $0.0145\pc$. Two trends_are_in_evidence: only IMBHs more massive_than about $4000 M_{\odot}$ can transport_multiple stars within $\sim 0.13\pc$, and while massive IMBHs_can make such_deliveries, they must do so_when_their_eccentricities are