&-E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau}L\psi(x_t(x))dt\\
=&-E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
=&E\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}(x)}(x)\big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
=&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
\le&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau\le T}+2K_0P(\tau>T)\\
\le&K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}\\
E(\tau^{\varepsilon}-\tau)I_{\tau<\tau^{\varepsilon}}\le&-2E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau^{\varepsilon}}L^{\varepsilon}\psi(x^{\varepsilon}_t(x))dt\\
\le&\cdots \le K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}.\end{aligned}$$ Hence by first letting ${\varepsilon}\downarrow 0$ and then $T\uparrow\infty$, we conclude that $$|u^{\varepsilon}(x)-u(x)|\rightarrow0\mbox{ as }{\varepsilon}\rightarrow 0.$$

Moreover, for small ${\varepsilon}$ the condition (\[psi\]) holds for $2\psi$, taken instead of $\psi$ and $L^{\varepsilon}$ associated to the process $x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$. The matrix $\sigma^{\varepsilon}$ corresponding to the process $x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$ is obtained by attaching the identity matrix, multiplied by ${\varepsilon}$, to the right of the original matrix $\sigma$. In this connection
& -E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau}L\psi(x_t(x))dt\\ 
 = & -E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ 
 = & E\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}(x)}(x)\big) 
 I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ 
 = & E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big) 
 I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ 
 \le&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big) 
 I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau\le T}+2K_0P(\tau > T)\\ 
 \le&K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0 ^ 2}{T}\\ 
 E(\tau^{\varepsilon}-\tau)I_{\tau<\tau^{\varepsilon}}\le&-2E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau^{\varepsilon}}L^{\varepsilon}\psi(x^{\varepsilon}_t(x))dt\\ 
 \le&\cdots \le K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0 ^ 2}{T}.\end{aligned}$$ Hence by first letting $ { \varepsilon}\downarrow 0 $ and then $ T\uparrow\infty$, we conclude that $ $ |u^{\varepsilon}(x)-u(x)|\rightarrow0\mbox { as } { \varepsilon}\rightarrow 0.$$ 

 furthermore, for humble $ { \varepsilon}$ the condition (\[psi\ ]) holds for $ 2\psi$, lead rather of $ \psi$ and $ L^{\varepsilon}$ associated to the process $ x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$. The matrix $ \sigma^{\varepsilon}$ represent to the summons $ x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$ is obtained by attach the identity matrix, multiplied by $ { \varepsilon}$, to the right of the original matrix $ \sigma$. In this joining
&-E\inh_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tam}L\psi(x_t(x))dt\\
=&-E\Big(\psn\vig(x_{\tan}(x)\big)-\psj\big(x_{\tau^{\xarepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsipob}<\tau}\\
=&E\kfi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilov}(x)}(x)\big)
I_{\tal^{\varepsilin}<\tan}\\
=&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\vedepsilok}}(r)\big)-\pal\big(x^{\racepsilon}_{\tau^{\vareksilon}}(x)\big)\Bic)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilot}<\txu}\\
\pe&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\bid(x^{\varepxipon}_{\tau^{\varepsiljn}}(x)\bpg)\Fig)
I_{\fau^{\varepsilon}<\tau\le T}+2K_0P(\tau>T)\\
\le&K_0E\sup_{t\me \tau^{\verepsilon}\wedge\tsu\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\fgac{2K_0^2}{H}\\
E(\tau^{\varepsilon}-\tau)L_{\tau<\tau^{\varekailjb}}\le&-2E\int_{\tau\weage\tau^{\vareksnlon}}^{\tau^{\vareksilon}}L^{\varepsilon}\psi(x^{\varepsilon}_t(b))dt\\
\le&\edots \le K_0E\wup_{t\lf \tau^{\varepsioon}\weqge\tau\wedge B}|q_t(x)-x^{\varapsilon}_y(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}.\end{alinned}$$ Iencw by first letting ${\vacepsilon}\downarrow 0$ agd then $T\gpcrrow\infty$, we concludw rhat $$|o^{\vare[silub}(x)-u(b)|\rifhvardow0\mbod{ aa }{\varepsilkn}\rightarroq 0.$$

Moreover, for smalk ${\dqrepsilon}$ the condieijn (\[psi\]) holds for $2\psi$, taken instead of $\pvi$ znd $L^{\varepsilon}$ associared to the process $x_t^{\garepsilog}(x)$. The matrix $\sigma^{\varepsilon}$ corresponding to tha prorers $r_b^{\yareowipon}(x)$ is obtained by attaching the identity maedic, kultiplied by ${\yarepsilon}$, to the tihhy of the origival macdis $\sigma$. In this cojnectiog
&-E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau}L\psi(x_t(x))dt\\ =&-E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ =&E\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}(x)}(x)\big) I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ =&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big) I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\ \le&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big) \le&K_0E\sup_{t\le T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}\\ E(\tau^{\varepsilon}-\tau)I_{\tau<\tau^{\varepsilon}}\le&-2E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau^{\varepsilon}}L^{\varepsilon}\psi(x^{\varepsilon}_t(x))dt\\ \le K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge ${\varepsilon}\downarrow and then $T\uparrow\infty$, conclude that $$|u^{\varepsilon}(x)-u(x)|\rightarrow0\mbox{ }{\varepsilon}\rightarrow 0.$$ Moreover, for small ${\varepsilon}$ condition (\[psi\]) holds for $2\psi$, taken instead of $\psi$ and $L^{\varepsilon}$ associated to process $x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$. The matrix $\sigma^{\varepsilon}$ corresponding to the process $x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$ is obtained by the matrix, by to the right of the original matrix $\sigma$. In this connection
&-E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\Tau}L\psi(x_t(x))Dt\\
=&-E\BiG(\psI\biG(x_{\Tau}(x)\Big)-\pSi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepSIlon}}(X)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tAu}\\
=&E\psI\bIG(x_{\taU^{\VaRepsiLon}(x)}(x)\biG)
i_{\tAU^{\VarEpSiLon}<\TaU}\\
=&e\BIg(\psi\Big(X_{\tau^{\varEpsilon}}(x)\biG)-\psI\bIg(x^{\varepsiloN}_{\TaU^{\varepsiloN}}(x)\bIg)\Big)
I_{\tau^{\varEpsIlon}<\taU}\\
\lE&E\BIG(\psi\bIg(x_{\Tau^{\vaRepsilON}}(x)\big)-\pSi\big(x^{\varEpSIlon}_{\taU^{\VarepsiLON}}(x)\Big)\BIg)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tAU\lE t}+2K_0P(\tau>T)\\
\le&K_0E\sup_{T\le \tau^{\VaREpSILon}\WedGe\tau\wedge t}|x_T(x)-x^{\vaREpsilon}_T(X)|+\fRAC{2k_0^2}{T}\\
E(\TAu^{\varepsilon}-\tAu)I_{\tau<\tau^{\vaREpsIlon}}\le&-2e\iNt_{\tAU\wedge\Tau^{\vaRePSilOn}}^{\tau^{\varepsIlon}}l^{\varepsilOn}\psi(x^{\VArepsilON}_t(x))dt\\
\le&\Cdots \lE K_0E\Sup_{T\le \tAU^{\vArEpsIlON}\weDGe\Tau\WEdgE T}|x_t(x)-x^{\vaRePsIlon}_t(X)|+\fraC{2k_0^2}{t}.\ENd{alIgnEd}$$ HeNce by First letting ${\vArePsilON}\doWnarrOw 0$ and Then $t\uParroW\infty$, We conClUde that $$|u^{\varepsiLon}(x)-U(x)|\rightarRow0\MbOx{ aS }{\vArepsILon}\rigHtaRroW 0.$$

MoreovEr, for smALl ${\vArEPSIlOn}$ the condition (\[psi\]) hOlDS FoR $2\psi$, takeN insteAD oF $\pSI$ and $L^{\varEpSilOn}$ asSOCiateD to tHE pRocess $x_t^{\VarepsILoN}(x)$. the matrIx $\Sigma^{\vArEpsIloN}$ corrESponDing to The proceSs $x_t^{\vARepsilon}(x)$ is obtAIned by attachiNG tHE IdENtitY maTrix, multiplIed bY ${\VarePsilON}$, tO thE Right Of the OrIGiNAl matrix $\sigma$. In this CoNnectiOn
&-E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\ varepsilon }}^{\ tau }L\ ps i(x_ t(x) )dt\\
=&-E\Big ( \psi \big(x_{\tau}(x)\big)- \psi\ bi g (x_{ \ ta u^{\v arepsil o n} } ( x)\ bi g) \Bi g) I _{ \tau^ {\v arepsil on}<\tau}\ \
= &E \psi\big(x_{ \ ta u^{\vareps ilo n}(x)}(x)\bi g)I_{\ta u^ {\v a repsi lon }<\ta u}\\
= & E\Big( \psi\big( x_ { \tau^{ \ varepsi l o n} }(x) \big)-\psi\big(x^ { \v a repsilon}_{\ta u^{\va re p si l o n}} (x) \big)\Big) 
I _{\ta u ^{\vare p si l o n }<\ t au}\\
\le&E\B ig(\psi\big ( x_{ \tau^{ \v are p silon} }(x)\ bi g )-\ psi\big(x^{ \var epsilon}_ {\tau^ { \vareps i lon}}(x )\big) \Bi g)I_{\ t au ^{ \va re p sil o n} <\t a u\l e T}+2K_ 0P (\ tau>T )\\\ l e & K_0E \su p_{t \le \ tau^{\varepsi lon }\we d ge\ tau\w edgeT}|x _t (x)-x ^{\var epsil on }_t(x)|+\frac{2 K_0^ 2}{T}\\
E (\t au ^{\ va repsi l on}-\t au) I_{ \tau<\t au^{\va r eps il o n } }\ le&-2E\int_{\tau\w ed g e \t au^{\var epsilo n }} ^{ \ tau^{\va re psi lon} } L ^{\va reps i lo n}\psi(x ^{\var e ps il on}_t(x )) dt\\
\ le &\c dot s \le K_0E \sup_{ t\le \ta u^{\v a repsilon}\wedg e \tau\wedge T} | x_ t ( x) - x^{\ var epsilon}_t( x)|+ \ frac {2K_ 0 ^2 }{T } .\end {alig ne d }$ $  Hence by first let ti ng ${\ varep silon}\downar row 0$ and t h en $T\up arro w \i n fty$, we concl ude t hat $$|u^{ \ varepsil on}(x )-u(x)|\ rightarro w 0 \mbox{ a s } {\v are psi l o n} \rightarrow 0 . $ $

M or eover,for  small${\ var eps ilo n} $ the con dition ( \[ ps i\ ])  ho lds f o r $2\psi $,  ta ke n i nstea d  of $\ psi$and$L ^{ \ var epsilon } $a s soci at ed  tothe  p roces s $x _ t^{ \vareps ilon}(x)$ . T h e ma tr ix  $\sigm a^{\varepsilo n} $ correspo nd ing  to th e process$x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$i s obtai ned  by a ttac hing theide ntitymat r ix, mu ltipli ed by  $ {\v a r epsil o n }$ , t othe righto f  th e ori gi nalmatrix$\sigma$. In thisc onn ection
&-E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau}L\psi(x_t(x))dt\\
=&-E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
=&E\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}(x)}(x)\big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
=&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau}\\
\le&E\Big(\psi\big(x_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)-\psi\big(x^{\varepsilon}_{\tau^{\varepsilon}}(x)\big)\Big)
I_{\tau^{\varepsilon}<\tau\le T}+2K_0P(\tau>T)\\
\le&K_0E\sup_{t\le_\tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}\\
E(\tau^{\varepsilon}-\tau)I_{\tau<\tau^{\varepsilon}}\le&-2E\int_{\tau\wedge\tau^{\varepsilon}}^{\tau^{\varepsilon}}L^{\varepsilon}\psi(x^{\varepsilon}_t(x))dt\\
\le&\cdots_\le K_0E\sup_{t\le \tau^{\varepsilon}\wedge\tau\wedge T}|x_t(x)-x^{\varepsilon}_t(x)|+\frac{2K_0^2}{T}.\end{aligned}$$_Hence by_first_letting ${\varepsilon}\downarrow_0$_and then $T\uparrow\infty$,_we conclude that_$$|u^{\varepsilon}(x)-u(x)|\rightarrow0\mbox{ as }{\varepsilon}\rightarrow 0.$$

Moreover,_for small ${\varepsilon}$_the_condition (\[psi\]) holds for $2\psi$, taken instead of $\psi$ and $L^{\varepsilon}$ associated to the_process_$x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$. The_matrix_$\sigma^{\varepsilon}$_corresponding to the process $x_t^{\varepsilon}(x)$_is obtained by attaching the_identity matrix,_multiplied by ${\varepsilon}$, to the right of the_original_matrix $\sigma$. In_this connection