q$. If choice $m$ is true, for question $q$, $T_{qm} = 1$ and $\forall j \ne m,\,T_{qj} = 0$. Given the assumptions made in Section \[subsec\_preliminaries\], when the true responses of all questions are available, the likelihood is given by: $$\label{e8}
    \prod_{q=1}^{Q} \prod_{c=1}^{C} \left\{ p_c \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} \left(\pi_{cl}^{(a)}\right)^{n_{ql}^{(a)}}\right\}^{T_{qc}}$$ where $n_{ql}^{(a)}$ and $T_{qc}$ are known. Using equation \[e8\], we obtain the maximum likelihood estimators as: $$\label{e9}
    \hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a)} = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc} n_{ql}^{(a)}}{\sum_l \sum_q T_{qc} n_{ql}^{(a)}}$$ $$\label{e10}
    \hat{p}_c = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc}}{Q}$$ We then obtain using Bayes’ theorem: $$\label{e11}
    p(T_{qc} = 1 | \text{data}) = \frac{\prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{cl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_c }{ \sum_{r=1}^{C} \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{rl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_r}$$ The DS algorithm is then defined by using equations \[e9\] and \[e10\] to obtain the estimates of $p$s and $\pi$s in the M-step, followed by using equation \[e11\] and the estimates of $p$s and $\pi$s to calculate the new estimates of $T$s in the E-step. These two steps are repeated until convergence (when the values don’t change over an iteration).

A close examination of the DS and proposed FDS algorithms shows that our algorithm can be perceived as a ‘hard’ version of DS. The DS algorithm derives the likelihood assuming that the correct answers (which are ideally binary-valued) are
q$. If choice $ m$ is true, for question $ q$, $ T_{qm } = 1 $ and $ \forall j \ne m,\,T_{qj } = 0$. give the assumption made in Section \[subsec\_preliminaries\ ], when the true reaction of all questions are available, the likelihood is given by: $ $ \label{e8 } 
     \prod_{q=1}^{Q } \prod_{c=1}^{C } \left\ { p_c \prod_{a=1}^{A } \prod_{l=1}^{C } \left(\pi_{cl}^{(a)}\right)^{n_{ql}^{(a)}}\right\}^{T_{qc}}$$ where $ n_{ql}^{(a)}$ and $ T_{qc}$ are know. Using equation \[e8\ ], we receive the maximum likelihood estimators as: $ $ \label{e9 } 
     \hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a) } = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc } n_{ql}^{(a)}}{\sum_l \sum_q T_{qc } n_{ql}^{(a)}}$$ $ $ \label{e10 } 
     \hat{p}_c = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc}}{Q}$$ We then prevail using Bayes ’ theorem: $ $ \label{e11 } 
     p(T_{qc } = 1 | \text{data }) = \frac{\prod_{a=1}^{A } \prod_{l=1}^{C } (\pi_{cl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a) } } p_c } { \sum_{r=1}^{C } \prod_{a=1}^{A } \prod_{l=1}^{C } (\pi_{rl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a) } } p_r}$$ The DS algorithm is then defined by use equation \[e9\ ] and \[e10\ ] to obtain the estimates of $ p$s and $ \pi$s in the M - step, followed by using equality \[e11\ ] and the estimates of $ p$s and $ \pi$s to calculate the new estimate of $ T$s in the E - step. These two footfall are reprise until convergence (when the value do n’t change over an iteration). 

 A close examination of the DS and project FDS algorithms shows that our algorithm can be perceived as a ‘ hard ’ version of DS. The DS algorithm derive the likelihood assume that the correct answers (which are ideally binary - valued) are
q$. Iv choice $m$ is true, for qmestion $q$, $T_{qm} = 1$ cbd $\forell j \ns m,\,T_{qj} = 0$. Given the assumptions made mn Swctiob \[subsec\_preliminaries\], dhen the nrue respinsew of all quxations are avzllablz, vhe likelihood ls given by: $$\label{e8}
    \prog_{q=1}^{D} \'rod_{c=1}^{C} \left\{ p_c \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} \left(\pi_{cj}^{(a)}\right)^{m_{qp}^{(a)}}\right\}^{T_{qc}}$$ whete $n_{qk}^{(w)}$ ans $T_{qc}$ are known. Using equation \[e8\], ws obtaii the maximum lokelihood estimators as: $$\lahel{e9}
    \hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a)} = \frac{\dum_q T_{qc} n_{qo}^{(a)}}{\sui_o \sum_q T_{qc} n_{dl}^{(a)}}$$ $$\label{e10}
    \hat{p}_c = \ftac{\sum_q T_{qc}}{Q}$$ We then obtain usine Bayzs’ theorem: $$\oavel{f11}
    p(T_{qc} = 1 | \text{qata}) = \frac{\prod_{a=1}^{A} \prog_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{ck}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_c }{ \sum_{v=1}^{C} \prmd_{a=1}^{Q} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{rl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_r}$$ The DS algorithm ys then dafnned by using equatiobs \[e9\] ang \[e10\] do ocraiv tge eatimatfs kf $p$s and $\li$s in the N-step, followed by uxigt equation \[e11\] znd thq qstimates of $p$s and $\pi$s to calculate tht new estimates of $T$s in the E-step. These two stepd are repqated until convergence (when the values don’t chance ovxr an iberaguoj).

A close examination of the DS and proposed FQA slnorithms shows tmat our algorithm vaj ng perceived as a ‘harb’ vsrsion of DS. The DD algorythm eerives tre lokelihood assuming that the correct anscerw (which are ideallv binary-valuzd) are
q$. If choice $m$ is true, for $T_{qm} 1$ and j \ne m,\,T_{qj} made Section \[subsec\_preliminaries\], when true responses of questions are available, the likelihood is by: $$\label{e8} \prod_{q=1}^{Q} \prod_{c=1}^{C} \left\{ p_c \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} \left(\pi_{cl}^{(a)}\right)^{n_{ql}^{(a)}}\right\}^{T_{qc}}$$ where $n_{ql}^{(a)}$ and $T_{qc}$ known. Using equation \[e8\], we obtain the maximum likelihood estimators as: $$\label{e9} \hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a)} \frac{\sum_q n_{ql}^{(a)}}{\sum_l T_{qc} $$\label{e10} \hat{p}_c = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc}}{Q}$$ We then obtain using Bayes’ theorem: $$\label{e11} p(T_{qc} = 1 | = \frac{\prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{cl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_c }{ \sum_{r=1}^{C} \prod_{a=1}^{A} (\pi_{rl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_r}$$ The DS is then defined by using \[e9\] \[e10\] to the of and $\pi$s in M-step, followed by using equation \[e11\] and the estimates of $p$s and $\pi$s to calculate the new of $T$s E-step. These steps repeated convergence (when the change over an iteration). A close DS and proposed FDS algorithms shows that our can be as a ‘hard’ version of DS. DS algorithm derives the likelihood assuming that the answers (which are ideally binary-valued) are
q$. If choice $m$ is true, for questiOn $q$, $T_{qm} = 1$ and $\fOrall J \ne M,\,T_{qJ} = 0$. GIven The aSsumptions made IN SecTion \[subsec\_preliminarieS\], when ThE True REsPonseS of all qUEsTIOns ArE aVaiLaBLe, The liKelIhood is Given by: $$\labEl{e8}
    \PrOd_{q=1}^{Q} \prod_{c=1}^{C} \leFT\{ p_C \prod_{a=1}^{A} \proD_{l=1}^{C} \Left(\pi_{cl}^{(a)}\rigHt)^{n_{Ql}^{(a)}}\rigHt\}^{t_{qc}}$$ WHere $n_{Ql}^{(a)}$ And $T_{qC}$ are knOWn. UsinG equation \[E8\], wE Obtain THe maximUM LiKeliHood estimators as: $$\lABeL{E9}
    \hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a)} = \frac{\sUm_q T_{qc} N_{qL}^{(A)}}{\sUM_L \suM_q T_{Qc} n_{ql}^{(a)}}$$ $$\labeL{e10}
    \Hat{p}_c = \FRac{\sum_q t_{Qc}}{q}$$ wE TheN Obtain using BaYes’ theorem: $$\lABel{E11}
    p(T_{qc} = 1 | \tExT{daTA}) = \frac{\pRod_{a=1}^{A} \PrOD_{l=1}^{C} (\Pi_{cl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_c }{ \Sum_{r=1}^{c} \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prOd_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{RL}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_R}$$ the DS alGorithM is TheN defINeD bY usInG EquATiOns \[E9\] And \[E10\] to obtaiN tHe EstimAtes OF $P$S And $\pI$s iN the m-step, Followed by usiNg eQuatIOn \[e11\] And thE estiMateS oF $p$s anD $\pi$s to CalcuLaTe the new estimatEs of $t$s in the E-sTep. thEse TwO stepS Are repEatEd uNtil conVergencE (WheN tHE VAlUes don’t change over aN iTERaTion).

A cloSe examINaTiON of the DS AnD prOposED fDS alGoriTHmS shows thAt our aLGoRiThm can bE pErceivEd As a ‘HarD’ versIOn of dS. The Ds algoritHm derIVes the likelihoOD assuming that THe CORrECt anSweRs (which are iDealLY binAry-vALuEd) aRE
q$. If choice $m$ is true,  for quest ion $ q$,  $T _{ qm}= 1$  and $\forallj  \ne  m,\,T_{qj} = 0$. Give n the  a s sump t io ns ma de in S e ct i o n \ [s ub sec \_ p re limin ari es\], w hen the tr uere sponses of a l lquestionsare  available,the  likel ih ood is gi ven  by:$$\lab e l{e8}    \prod _{ q =1}^{Q }  \prod_ { c =1 }^{C } \left\{ p_c \pr o d_ { a=1}^{A} \prod _{l=1} ^{ C }\ l eft (\p i_{cl}^{(a )} \righ t )^{n_{q l }^ { ( a )}} \ right\}^{T_{q c}}$$ where $n_ {ql}^{ (a )}$ and $T _{qc} $a reknown. Usin g eq uation \[ e8\],w e obtai n  the ma ximumlik eli hood es ti mat or s  as :  $ $\l a bel {e9}
   \ ha t{\pi }_{c l } ^ { (a)}  =\fra c{\su m_q T_{qc} n_ {ql }^{( a )}} {\sum _l \s um_q  T _{qc}  n_{ql }^{(a )} }$$ $$\label{e1 0}
   \hat{p }_c  =  \f ra c{\su m _q T_{ qc} }{Q }$$ Wethen ob t ain  u s i n gBayes’ theorem: $$ \l a b el {e11}
   p(T_ { qc }=  1 | \te xt {da ta}) =  \fra c{\p r od _{a=1}^{ A} \pr o d_ {l =1}^{C}  ( \pi_{c l} ^{( a)} )^{n_ { ql}^ {(a)}}  p_c }{\sum_ { r=1}^{C} \prod _ {a=1}^{A} \pr o d_ { l =1 } ^{C}  (\ pi_{rl}^{(a )})^ { n_{q l}^{ ( a) }}p _r}$$  TheDS al g orithm is then defi ne d by u singequations \[e 9\] and \[ e 1 0 \] to ob tain th e  estimates of$p$sand $\pi$s in the M -step , follow ed by usi n g  equatio n \ [e1 1\]  an d th e estimates o f $p$s  a nd $\pi $sto calc ula tethe  ne westimates  of $T$s  i nth eE-s tep.T hese two  s tep sare  repe a ted un til c onve rg en c e ( when th e  v a l uesdo n’ t ch ang eoveran i t era tion).
A closeexa m inat io nof theDS and propos ed  FDS algor it hms  shows t hat ouralgorithm can be percei v ed as a  ‘h ard’vers ion of DS . T he DSalg o rithmderive s the  l ike l i hooda s su min gthat the c o r rec t ans we rs ( which a re ideally binary- v alu ed) are
q$. If_choice $m$_is true, for question_$q$, $T_{qm}_=_1$ and_$\forall_j \ne m,\,T_{qj}_= 0$. Given_the assumptions made in_Section \[subsec\_preliminaries\], when_the_true responses of all questions are available, the likelihood is given by: $$\label{e8}
 __ \prod_{q=1}^{Q}_\prod_{c=1}^{C}_\left\{_p_c \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} \left(\pi_{cl}^{(a)}\right)^{n_{ql}^{(a)}}\right\}^{T_{qc}}$$ where_$n_{ql}^{(a)}$ and $T_{qc}$ are known._Using equation_\[e8\], we obtain the maximum likelihood estimators as:_$$\label{e9}
_  _\hat{\pi}_{cl}^{(a)} = \frac{\sum_q T_{qc} n_{ql}^{(a)}}{\sum_l \sum_q T_{qc} n_{ql}^{(a)}}$$ $$\label{e10}
_   \hat{p}_c = \frac{\sum_q_T_{qc}}{Q}$$ We then_obtain_using_Bayes’ theorem: $$\label{e11}
 _  p(T_{qc} = 1 |_\text{data}) = \frac{\prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{cl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_c_}{ \sum_{r=1}^{C} \prod_{a=1}^{A} \prod_{l=1}^{C} (\pi_{rl}^{(a)})^{n_{ql}^{(a)}} p_r}$$ The_DS algorithm is then defined by_using equations \[e9\] and \[e10\]_to obtain_the estimates of $p$s and_$\pi$s in the_M-step, followed_by using equation_\[e11\] and the estimates of $p$s_and $\pi$s to_calculate the new estimates of $T$s_in_the E-step. These_two_steps_are repeated_until convergence (when_the_values don’t_change_over an iteration).

A close examination of_the_DS and proposed FDS algorithms shows that_our algorithm can be_perceived_as a ‘hard’ version_of DS. The DS algorithm_derives the likelihood assuming that the_correct answers_(which are_ideally binary-valued) are