Delta F_{\nu } $) were calculated from

$$\label{Ferror}
\Delta F_{\nu }=F_{\nu }\left( \pi _{\circ },R_{\circ },T_{\circ }\right) \left[ \frac{2\Delta \pi }{\pi }+\frac{2\Delta R}{R}\right] \, [Jy]$$

where flux uncertainty due to $ \Delta \mathrm{T} $ is negligible (less than 0.02% for a given 1% error in T at 10,000K). Average flux uncertainties due to $ \pi  $ and $ R $ uncertainties are 3% and 4%, respectively. If we define the significance of IR excess ($ r_{\nu } $) as excess IR flux normalized by the uncertainty, then it can be calculated by $ r_{\nu }=(F_{IRAS}-F_{\nu })/\Delta F $ where $ \Delta F $ is the total flux uncertainty due to $ \Delta F_{\nu } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ ($ F_{IRAS} $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ stand for flux value and flux uncertainty value from the IRAS catalog, respectively). $ \Delta F_{\nu } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ were added in quadrature to calculate the total flux uncertainty ($ \Delta F $). We define the *bona–fide* Vega–like stars to be those that show significant IR excesses, $ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $, at three or more IRAS bands, with the most prominent excess at 60 $ \mu  $m. We have found that 51 additional stars show significant IR excesses ($ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $) at both 12 and 25 $ \mu  $m. However, only 14 of them turned out to be legitimate Vega–like star candidates. The other 37 stars are either luminosity class $ III $ stars (whose IR excesses would not arise because of a circumstellar dust disk) or stars whose excess radiation can easily be explained with a nearby companion star within the IRAS beam. The new Vega–like candidates are summarized in Table \[new\] with their $ r_{\nu } $ values at 12 and 25 $ \mu  $m. Determining the $ f $ values for the Vega–like candidates with only 12 and 25 $ \mu  $m IR flux measurements
Delta F_{\nu } $) were calculated from 

 $ $ \label{Ferror } 
 \Delta F_{\nu } = F_{\nu } \left (\pi _ { \circ }, R_{\circ }, T_{\circ } \right) \left [ \frac{2\Delta \pi } { \pi } + \frac{2\Delta R}{R}\right ] \, [ Jy]$$ 

 where flux uncertainty due to $ \Delta \mathrm{T } $ is negligible (less than 0.02% for a given 1% mistake in T at 10,000 thousand). Average flux uncertainties due to $ \pi   $ and $ gas constant $ uncertainties are 3% and 4% , respectively. If we define the meaning of IR excess ($ r_{\nu } $) as excess IR flux normalized by the doubt, then it can be account by $ r_{\nu } =( F_{IRAS}-F_{\nu }) /\Delta F $ where $ \Delta F $ is the full flux uncertainty due to $ \Delta F_{\nu } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS } $ ($ F_{IRAS } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS } $ resist for magnetic field value and flux uncertainty value from the IRAS catalog, respectively). $ \Delta F_{\nu } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS } $ were added in quadrature to calculate the total magnetic field uncertainty ($ \Delta F $). We define the * bona – fide * Vega – like stars to be those that express significant IR excesses, $ r_{\nu } \geq 3.0 $, at three or more IRAS bands, with the most outstanding excess at 60   $ \mu   $ m. We have found that 51 additional stars show meaning IR excesses ($ r_{\nu } \geq 3.0 $) at both 12 and 25   $ \mu   $ m. However, only 14 of them turned out to be legitimate Vega – like star candidates. The early 37 star are either luminosity class $ III $ stars (whose IR excesses would not arise because of a circumstellar dust disk) or stars whose excess radiation can easily be explain with a nearby companion star within the IRAS beam. The modern Vega – like campaigner are summarized in Table   \[new\ ] with their $ r_{\nu } $ values at 12 and 25   $ \mu   $ m. Determining the $ f $ value for the Vega – like campaigner with only 12 and 25   $ \mu   $ m IR magnetic field measurements
Delha F_{\nu } $) were calculated from

$$\label{Ferrot}
\Dwlta F_{\iu }=F_{\nu }\meft( \pi _{\zirc },R_{\circ },T_{\circ }\right) \left[ \hrac{2\Eelta \pi }{\pi }+\frac{2\Delta R}{R}\rigft] \, [Jy]$$

whege flux ubceruainty due to $ \Delta \mathvi{T} $ jd neylmgible (less thak 0.02% for a gieen 1% error in D xt 10,000K). Average flux uncertainties due tj $ \pi  $ ajd $ R $ uncertayntits wre 3% and 4%, respectively. If we define ths signihicance of IR eccess ($ r_{\nu } $) as excess IR vlux normalized by the uncertainti, thqb it can be zalculated by $ r_{\nu }=(F_{IRZS}-F_{\nu })/\Delta F $ where $ \Delta F $ ks thz total fluz yncfttainty due vo $ \Dejta F_{\nu } $ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ ($ F_{IRAS} $ and $ \Celva F_{URAS} $ stand for flux talue and flux uncerjainty valge from the IRAS caraoog, rgspecdiveut). $ \Aelua H_{\nu } $ and $ \Dxlta F_{IRAS} $ were added in quadrature to cslslkate the totzl fluv tncertainty ($ \Delta F $). We define the *bond–fise* Vega–like stars to be those that show signlficant IW excesses, $ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $, at three or more IRAS bands, with ghe mjrr orominent excess at 60 $ \mu  $m. We have found that 51 acdptional stars shoc significant IR edcrfses ($ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $) at yktg 12 and 25 $ \mu  $m. Howeger, onli 14 of rhem turntd ouy to be legitimate Vega–like star candidctew. The other 37 stars are either lumonosiyy class $ III $ stars (whuse JR excesses would nof arise because ow a chrcumstellar dust disk) or ftars whowe ercess raaiatoon cag easily bf explained with a nearbj comkanion star withln the IRAS beam. The new Vega–like candidates sra slmmarized in Tsble \[new\] with eheir $ r_{\nu } $ vclues at 12 and 25 $ \mu  $m. Denermining the $ f $ vajues for the Egga–like candivates witr onoy 12 qnd 25 $ \mu  $m IR flux meaxurements
Delta F_{\nu } $) were calculated from F_{\nu }\left( \pi },R_{\circ },T_{\circ }\right) R}{R}\right] [Jy]$$ where flux due to $ \mathrm{T} $ is negligible (less than for a given 1% error in T at 10,000K). Average flux uncertainties due $ \pi $ and $ R $ uncertainties are 3% and 4%, respectively. we the of excess ($ r_{\nu } $) as excess IR flux normalized by the uncertainty, then it can calculated by $ r_{\nu }=(F_{IRAS}-F_{\nu })/\Delta F $ $ \Delta F $ the total flux uncertainty due $ F_{\nu } and \Delta $ ($ F_{IRAS} and $ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ stand for flux value and flux uncertainty value from the IRAS catalog, $ \Delta $ and \Delta $ added in quadrature the total flux uncertainty ($ \Delta define the *bona–fide* Vega–like stars to be those show significant excesses, $ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $, three or more IRAS bands, with the most excess at 60 $ \mu $m. We have found that 51 additional stars show significant ($ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 at both 12 25 \mu However, 14 of turned out to be legitimate Vega–like star candidates. The other 37 are either luminosity class $ III $ stars (whose IR not because of a dust disk) or stars excess can easily be explained nearby star beam. new candidates are summarized in \[new\] with their $ r_{\nu $ values at 12 Determining the $ f $ values for the candidates with only 12 and 25 $ $m IR flux measurements
Delta F_{\nu } $) were calculated froM

$$\label{FerrOr}
\DelTa F_{\Nu }=F_{\Nu }\Left( \Pi _{\ciRc },R_{\circ },T_{\circ }\riGHt) \leFt[ \frac{2\Delta \pi }{\pi }+\frac{2\DelTa R}{R}\rIgHT] \, [Jy]$$

wHErE flux UncertaINtY DUe tO $ \DElTa \mAtHRm{t} $ is neGliGible (leSs than 0.02% for a GivEn 1% Error in T at 10,000K). AVErAge flux uncErtAinties due to $ \Pi  $ aNd $ R $ uncErTaiNTies aRe 3% aNd 4%, resPectivELy. If we Define the SiGNificaNCe of IR eXCEsS ($ r_{\nu } $) As excess IR flux norMAlIZed by the uncertAinty, tHeN It CAN be CalCulated by $ r_{\Nu }=(f_{IRAS}-f_{\Nu })/\Delta f $ WhERE $ \delTA F $ is the total fLux uncertaiNTy dUe to $ \DeLtA F_{\nU } $ And $ \DelTa F_{IRaS} $ ($ f_{iRAs} $ and $ \Delta F_{IrAS} $ sTand for flUx valuE And flux UNcertaiNty valUe fRom The IraS CaTalOg, REspECtIveLY). $ \DeLta F_{\nu } $ anD $ \DElTa F_{IRaS} $ weRE ADDed iN quAdraTure tO calculate the TotAl flUX unCertaInty ($ \DElta f $). WE defiNe the *bOna–fiDe* vega–like stars to Be thOse that shOw sIgNifIcAnt IR EXcesseS, $ r_{\nU }\geQ 3.0 $, at threE or more irAS BaNDS, WiTh the most prominent ExCESs At 60 $ \mu  $m. We hAve fouND tHaT 51 AdditionAl StaRs shOW SigniFicaNT Ir excesseS ($ r_{\nu }\geQ 3.0 $) At BoTh 12 and 25 $ \mu  $M. HOwever, OnLy 14 oF thEm turNEd ouT to be lEgitimatE Vega–LIke star candidaTEs. The other 37 staRS aRE EiTHer lUmiNosity class $ iII $ sTArs (wHose ir eXceSSes woUld noT aRIsE Because of a circumsteLlAr dust Disk) oR stars whose exCess radiatION Can easilY be eXPlAIned with a nearbY compAnion star wIThin the IrAS beAm. The new vega–like cANDidates aRe sUmmAriZed IN taBle \[new\] with theIR $ R_{\nu } $ vAlUes at 12 anD 25 $ \mu  $M. DetermIniNg tHe $ f $ ValUeS for the VeGa–like caNdIdAtEs WitH only 12 ANd 25 $ \mu  $m IR fLuX meAsUreMents
Delta F_{\nu } $) were cal culated fr om

$ $\l abe l{ Ferr or}\Delta F_{\nu} =F_{ \nu }\left( \pi _{\cir c },R _{ \ circ }, T_{\c irc }\r i gh t )  \l ef t[  \f ra c {2 \Delt a \ pi }{\p i }+\frac{ 2\D el ta R}{R}\rig h t]  \, [Jy]$$ 

w here flux un cer tainty  d uet o $ \ Del ta \m athrm{ T } $ is  negligib le (lesst han 0.0 2 %  f or a  given 1% error i n  T at 10,000K). A verage  f l ux u nce rta inties due  t o $ \ p i  $ an d  $ R $ u n certainties a re 3% and 4 % , r espect iv ely .  If we  defi ne the  significan ce o f IR exce ss ($r _{\nu } $) as e xcessIRflu x no r ma li zed  b y  th e  u nce r tai nty, the nit  canbe c a l c u late d b y $r_{\n u }=(F_{IRAS} -F_ {\nu })/ \Delt a F $  whe re  $ \D elta F  $ is  t he total flux u ncer tainty du e t o$ \ De lta F _ {\nu }  $and  $ \Del ta F_{I R AS}  $ ( $  F _{IRAS} $ and $ \D el t a  F _{IRAS}$ stan d  f or flux val ue  an d fl u x  unce rtai n ty  value f rom th e  I RA S catal og , resp ec tiv ely ). $\ Delt a F_{\ nu } $ a nd $\ Delta F_{IRAS} $ were addedi nq u ad r atur e t o calculate  the tota l fl u xunc e rtain ty ($  \ D el t a F $). We define t he  *bona –fide * Vega–like s tars to be t h ose that  sho w  s i gnificant IR e xcess es, $ r_{\ n u }\geq3.0 $ , at thr ee or mor e IRAS ban ds,  wi ththe m os t prominent e x c essat  60 $ \ mu $m. We  ha vefou ndth at 51 add itionalst ar ssh owsigni f icant IR  e xce ss es($ r_ { \nu }\ geq 3 .0 $ )at bot h 12 an d  2 5 $ \m u $ m. H owe ve r, on ly 1 4  of  them t urned out  to be l eg it imate V ega–like star  c andidates.  T heother3 7  stars a re either luminosity cl a ss $ II I $  star s (w hose IR e xce sses w oul d  not a rise b ecaus eofa circu m s te lla rdust disk) o r s tarswh oseexcessradiation can easi l y b e explained w ith  a n e a rb y c o mp a nio ns tar w ithin the IRASbeam. Thene w  V ega–like c a ndi da tes are  summar izedi n Table  \[new\]with thei r$ r_ { \ nu} $ values  at 12 a nd 25 $ \ m u  $m .  D eterm ini ng the  $  f$ val ues fo r  th e Veg a–like  c andida tes w it h only 1 2 and 25 $ \mu  $m IR f lux me asure men ts
Delta F_{\nu_} $)_were calculated from

$$\label{Ferror}
\Delta F_{\nu_}=F_{\nu }\left(_\pi__{\circ },R_{\circ_},T_{\circ_}\right) \left[ \frac{2\Delta_\pi }{\pi }+\frac{2\Delta_R}{R}\right] \, [Jy]$$

where flux_uncertainty due to_$_\Delta \mathrm{T} $ is negligible (less than 0.02% for a given 1% error in_T_at 10,000K)._Average_flux_uncertainties due to $ \pi_ $ and $ R_$ uncertainties_are 3% and 4%, respectively. If we define_the_significance of IR_excess ($ r_{\nu } $) as excess IR flux_normalized by the uncertainty, then it_can be calculated_by_$_r_{\nu }=(F_{IRAS}-F_{\nu })/\Delta F_$ where $ \Delta F $_is the total flux uncertainty due_to $ \Delta F_{\nu } $ and_$ \Delta F_{IRAS} $ ($ F_{IRAS}_$ and $ \Delta F_{IRAS}_$ stand_for flux value and flux_uncertainty value from_the IRAS_catalog, respectively). $_\Delta F_{\nu } $ and $_\Delta F_{IRAS} $_were added in quadrature to calculate_the_total flux uncertainty_($_\Delta_F $)._We define the_*bona–fide*_Vega–like stars_to_be those that show significant IR_excesses,_$ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $, at three_or more IRAS bands,_with_the most prominent excess_at 60 $ \mu  $m._We have found that 51 additional_stars show_significant IR_excesses ($ r_{\nu }\geq 3.0 $) at both 12 and 25 $_\mu  $m. However, only 14_of them turned out_to be_legitimate_Vega–like star candidates._The_other 37_stars are either luminosity class $ III_$ stars_(whose IR excesses would not arise_because of a circumstellar_dust_disk) or stars whose excess radiation_can easily be explained with a_nearby companion star within the_IRAS_beam._The new Vega–like candidates are_summarized in Table \[new\] with their $_r_{\nu } $_values at 12 and 25 $ \mu _$m._Determining the $ f $ values_for_the Vega–like candidates with only 12_and_25 $_\mu  $m IR flux_measurements