$ for the Cu site in clear contradiction to the experiment. Yet, the distorted structure provides reasonable $\eta$ values for the Cu and Cl sites. For the Cu site, $V_{zz}$ and $\eta$ strongly depend on $U_d$, since the on-site correlations modify the electronic distribution around this site. For the Cl atoms, the dependence on $U_d$ is weak, while the results for the La site are almost independent on $U_d$, because the La and Cu sites are far apart. At $U_d=5.5$ eV and 7.5 eV, the EFG’s on the Cu and Cl sites are in good agreement with the experiment. The orientation of the EFG tensors is also reproduced. For the La site, the calculations yield the reasonable value of $V_{zz}$ and the correct orientation of the tensor. However, the calculated asymmetry parameter is well below the experimental one.

  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
                                                                           
       $U_d$ (eV)        $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{zz}$   $\eta$
   Distorted structure                                                     
           3.5            $-6.9$     0.38    $-19.1$     0.62      5.6       0.03
           5.5            $-9.8$     0.05    $-18.0$     0.60      5.6       0.03
           7.5           $-12.2$     0.20    $-17.1$     0.59      5.7       0.03
    Regular structure                                                      
           3.5             9.0        0      $-18.4$      0        5.5        0
           5.5             12.7       0      $-17.3$      0        5.5        0
           7.5             15.4       0      $-16.5$      0        5.6        0
       Experiment                                                          
                           11.6      0.10    $-14.2$     0.56      6.5       0.70
  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------

  : \[tab\_efg\] Computational estimates of the electric field gradients for the distorted and regular structures of (CuCl)LaN
$ for the Cu site in clear contradiction to the experiment. Yet, the distorted social organization provide reasonable $ \eta$ values for the Cu and Cl web site. For the Cu web site, $ V_{zz}$ and $ \eta$ strongly depend on $ U_d$, since the on - site correlation modify the electronic distribution around this site. For the Cl atom, the dependence on $ U_d$ is weak, while the resultant role for the La site are almost autonomous on $ U_d$, because the La and Cu sites are far apart. At $ U_d=5.5 $   eV and 7.5   eV, the EFG ’s on the Cu and Cl sites are in good agreement with the experiment. The orientation of the EFG tensors is also reproduce. For the La site, the calculations yield the fair value of $ V_{zz}$ and the correct orientation of the tensor. However, the deliberate asymmetry parameter is well below the experimental one. 

   --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- 
                                                                           
        $ U_d$ (eV)         $ V_{zz}$    $ \eta$    $ V_{zz}$    $ \eta$    $ V_{zz}$    $ \eta$ 
    falsify structure                                                     
            3.5             $ -6.9 $      0.38     $ -19.1 $      0.62       5.6        0.03 
            5.5             $ -9.8 $      0.05     $ -18.0 $      0.60       5.6        0.03 
            7.5            $ -12.2 $      0.20     $ -17.1 $      0.59       5.7        0.03 
     Regular structure                                                      
            3.5              9.0         0       $ -18.4 $       0         5.5         0 
            5.5              12.7        0       $ -17.3 $       0         5.5         0 
            7.5              15.4        0       $ -16.5 $       0         5.6         0 
        Experiment                                                          
                            11.6       0.10     $ -14.2 $      0.56       6.5        0.70 
   --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- 

  : \[tab\_efg\ ] Computational estimates of the electric field gradient for the distorted and regular structures of (CuCl)LaN
$ fog the Cu site in clear cuntradiction to the ex'erimenf. Yet, thd distorted structure providxs rwasonqble $\eta$ values for thd Cu and Bl sites. Dor uhe Cu site, $V_{zz}$ ais $\eta$ sbxonglg depznv on $U_d$, since tme on-site cmrrelations mogiwy the electronic distribution around this sotf. For the Cl ajoms, uhe depsndence on $U_d$ is weak, while the reaults fmr the La sitr are almost independent oj $U_d$, because the La anf Cu sites qre sqr apart. At $J_d=5.5$ eV and 7.5 eN, the EFG’s kn the Cu and Cl sites are in guod ayreement wijk thf experiment. The jrientation of the EXG tensprs is also reirodured. Dor the La site, the celculations yield thg reasonabne value of $V_{zz}$ and tye cotrect oridbtagioh pf the tfnskr. However, the calculqted asymmetry parakeevt is well bemow thq qxperimental one.

  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
                                                                           
       $U_d$ (eV)        $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{sz}$   $\xtx$
   Dlstofref structure                                                     
           3.5            $-6.9$     0.38    $-19.1$     0.62      5.6       0.03
           5.5            $-9.8$     0.05    $-18.0$     0.60      5.6       0.03
           7.5           $-12.2$     0.20    $-17.1$     0.59      5.7       0.03
    Rggular structure                                                      
           3.5             9.0        0      $-18.4$      0        5.5        0
           5.5             12.7       0      $-17.3$      0        5.5        0
           7.5             15.4       0      $-16.5$      0        5.6        0
       Expqriment                                                          
                           11.6      0.10    $-14.2$     0.56      6.5       0.70
  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------

  : \[tab\_efg\] Computational estlmater of the electrie dield gradients fof tre dmstoread and reguldr sgruzyures of (CuCl)LaN
$ for the Cu site in clear the Yet, the structure provides reasonable and sites. For the site, $V_{zz}$ and strongly depend on $U_d$, since the correlations modify the electronic distribution around this site. For the Cl atoms, the on $U_d$ is weak, while the results for the La site are almost on because La Cu sites are far apart. At $U_d=5.5$ eV and 7.5 eV, the EFG’s on the Cu Cl sites are in good agreement with the The orientation of the tensors is also reproduced. For La the calculations the value $V_{zz}$ and the orientation of the tensor. However, the calculated asymmetry parameter is well below the experimental one. --------------------- ---------- ---------- -------- $U_d$ (eV) $\eta$ $\eta$ $\eta$ Distorted structure 0.38 $-19.1$ 0.62 5.6 0.03 5.5 0.60 5.6 0.03 7.5 $-12.2$ 0.20 $-17.1$ 0.59 0.03 Regular 3.5 9.0 0 $-18.4$ 0 5.5 5.5 12.7 0 $-17.3$ 0 5.5 0 7.5 0 $-16.5$ 0 5.6 0 Experiment 11.6 0.10 $-14.2$ 0.56 6.5 0.70 --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- : \[tab\_efg\] estimates of the field for distorted regular structures (CuCl)LaN
$ for the Cu site in clear contraDiction to tHe expEriMenT. YEt, thE disTorted structurE ProvIdes reasonable $\eta$ valueS for tHe cU and cL sItes. FOr the Cu SItE, $v_{Zz}$ aNd $\EtA$ stRoNGlY depeNd oN $U_d$, sincE the on-site CorReLations modifY ThE electroniC diStribution arOunD this sItE. FoR The Cl AtoMs, the DependENce on $U_D$ is weak, whIlE The resULts for tHE la Site Are almost independENt ON $U_d$, because the LA and Cu SiTEs ARE faR apArt. At $U_d=5.5$ eV aNd 7.5 EV, the efG’s on thE cu AND cl sITes are in good aGreement witH The ExperiMeNt. THE orienTatioN oF The eFG tensors iS alsO reproducEd. For tHE La site, THe calcuLationS yiEld The rEAsOnAblE vALue OF $V_{Zz}$ aND thE correct OrIeNtatiOn of THE TEnsoR. HoWeveR, the cAlculated asymMetRy paRAmeTer is Well bElow ThE expeRimentAl one.

  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
                                                                           
       $u_d$ (EV)        $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{zz}$   $\eta$   $V_{Zz}$   $\etA$
   DistorteD stRuCtuRe                                                     
           3.5            $-6.9$     0.38    $-19.1$     0.62      5.6       0.03
           5.5            $-9.8$     0.05    $-18.0$     0.60      5.6       0.03
           7.5           $-12.2$     0.20    $-17.1$     0.59      5.7       0.03
    regulAR strucTurE                                                      
           3.5             9.0        0      $-18.4$      0        5.5        0
           5.5             12.7       0      $-17.3$      0        5.5        0
           7.5             15.4       0      $-16.5$      0        5.6        0
       ExPerimenT                                                          
                           11.6      0.10    $-14.2$     0.56      6.5       0.70
  --------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------

  : \[tab\_efg\] cOmpUtATIOnAl estimates of the elEcTRIc Field graDients FOr ThE DistorteD aNd rEgulAR StrucTureS Of (cuCl)LaN
$ for the Cu site in clear  contradic tiontothe  e xper imen t. Yet, the di s tort ed structure providesreaso na b le $ \ et a$ va lues fo r  t h e  Cu  a nd  Cl  s i te s. Fo r t he Cu s ite, $V_{z z}$  a nd $\eta$ st r on gly depend  on  $U_d$, sinc e t he on- si tec orrel ati ons m odifyt he ele ctronic d is t ributi o n aroun d th is s ite. For the Cl a t om s , the dependen ce on$U _ d$ i s w eak , while th eresul t s for t h eL a sit e  are almost i ndependento n $ U_d$,be cau s e theLa an dC u s ites are fa r ap art. At $ U_d=5. 5 $ eV an d  7.5 eV , theEFG ’son t h eCu  an dC l s i te s a r e i n good a gr ee mentwith t h e  exp eri ment . The  orientationoftheE FGtenso rs is  als orepro duced.  Forth e La site, thecalc ulationsyie ld  th ereaso n able v alu e o f $V_{z z}$ and the  c o r r ec t orientation of t he t en sor. How ever,t he  c a lculated  a sym metr y param eter is  well be low th e  e xp eriment al  one.
 -- --- ----- - ---- ------  ------- --- - - ------ ------- - -- -------- - - -- - - -- - - -- --- ---
                                                        
       $U_d$  (eV)    $V_{zz}$    $ \ et a $   $V_{zz}$  $\et a$   $V_{z z }$   $\e ta$
  Distor ted struc t u re                                      
         3 .5         $-6 .9$    0. 38   $-1 9.1$   0.62   5. 6     0 .03
        5. 5        $ -9 . 8 $   0. 05   $ -1 8.0$   0 .60       5 .6      0.0 3 
        7.5            $- 12 .2$     0. 20    $-17. 1 $      0.5 9      5.7       0.03
  Regul arstruc ture                                                 3.5       9.0      0      $-18.4$    0       5.5      0    5.5         12.7      0      $- 17 . 3$       0     5 .5       0
        7.5           15.4     0    $-16.5$     0       5.6    0      E xperim en t                                              
                        11 .6      0 .10   $-14.2$    0 .56      6 .5     0. 70 ---- ---- - -- --- - ----- - -- - ------- - - -- --- - -- -------- -- - - - ---  ---- --- - -- --- ---- -

  : \[tab\_efg \ ] Computationa l es t i mat eso f th eelectric field  gr ad i e nts forth e distorted  and reg ul a r str ucture s of ( CuCl)La N 
$ for_the Cu_site in clear contradiction_to the_experiment._Yet, the_distorted_structure provides reasonable_$\eta$ values for_the Cu and Cl_sites. For the_Cu_site, $V_{zz}$ and $\eta$ strongly depend on $U_d$, since the on-site correlations modify the_electronic_distribution around_this_site._For the Cl atoms, the_dependence on $U_d$ is weak,_while the_results for the La site are almost independent_on_$U_d$, because the_La and Cu sites are far apart. At $U_d=5.5$ eV_and 7.5 eV, the EFG’s on the_Cu and Cl_sites_are_in good agreement with_the experiment. The orientation of the_EFG tensors is also reproduced. For_the La site, the calculations yield the_reasonable value of $V_{zz}$ and the_correct orientation of the tensor._However, the_calculated asymmetry parameter is well_below the experimental_one.

 _--------------------- ---------- --------_---------- -------- ---------- --------
  _  _     __  ___ _  __ __     __      _   __   _    _     _ _ _          
_     _$U_d$ (eV)  _ __  $V_{zz}$__ $\eta$_  $V_{zz}$   $\eta$ _ $V_{zz}$_  $\eta$
   Distorted_structure   __     _     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __
     ___   3.5 _     _    $-6.9$    _0.38  _ $-19.1$   __0.62_     5.6    _ _0.03
  _        5.5 _      _   $-9.8$     0.05  _ $-18.0$     0.60 _    5.6  _   _0.03
_      ____7.5  _  _  _ _$-12.2$  _ _0.20  __$-17.1$     0.59      5.7      _0.03
    Regular structure_    __  _   _       _        __ _   _ _ _  _ _ _ _   
   __      3.5  ____  _  _ 9.0 _  __  0   _  $-18.4$_   _ 0        5.5_       0
         _ 5.5_   _ __     12.7_ _    0   __ $-17.3$      0    ___ 5.5 __     0
_____     _7.5      __    _15.4 __   _0   _  $-16.5$      0  __ ___5.6_   _   0
       Experiment    __    _     __   _       _    _   _                   
 _    _    _  __  _   _    11.6   _  0.10    $-14.2$     0.56      6.5_      0.70
_ --------------------- ----------_-------- ----------_-------- ---------- --------

  : \[tab\_efg\] Computational estimates of_the electric field gradients for the distorted and regular structures of_(CuCl)LaN