 @vanproeyen], that is the torsionless condition, $R(P)=0$ and an additional constraint on $R(M)$. The two constraints admit an algebraic solution leading to expressions of the fields $\omega_\mu^{~ab}$ and $f_\mu^{~a}$ in terms of the independent fields $e_\mu^{~a}$ and $b_\mu$. Also, the gauge fixing $b_\mu=0$ can be employed and, inclusion of all constraints in the initial action lead to the well-known Weyl action.

Besides the above breaking of the conformal symmetry which led to the Weyl action, it is possible to employ an alternative breaking route, this time leading to an action with Lorentz symmetry, explicitly the Einstein-Hilbert action [@Chamseddine:2002fd]. From our prespective, the latter can be achieved through an alternative symmetry breaking mechanism, specifically with the inclusion of two scalar fields in the fundamental representation of the conformal group [@Li:1973mq], being a generalization of the case of the breaking of the 4-d de Sitter group down to the Lorentz group by the inclusion of a scalar in the fundamental representation of SO(1,4), as explained in section \[einsteingravity\]. The inclusion of two scalars could trigger a spontaneous symmetry breaking in a theory with matter fields and the resulting action would be the Einstein-Hilbert one, respecting Lorentz symmetry. Calculations and details on this issue will be included in a future work.

Moreover, the argument used in the previous section in the four-dimensional Poincaré gravity case, that is an alternative way to break the initial symmetry to the Lorentz, can be generalized for this case of conformal gravity. Since it is desired to result with the Lorentz symmetry out of the initial SO(2,4), the vacuum of the theory is considered to be directly SO(4) invariant, which means that every other tensor, except for the $R(M)$, has to be vanishing. Setting these tensors to zero will produce the constraints of the theory leading to expressions that relate the gauge fields. In particular, in [@Chamseddine:2002fd], it is argued that if both tensors $R(P)$ and $R(K)$ are simultaneously set to zero, then from the constraints of the theory it is understood that the corresponding gauge fields, $f_\mu^{~a}, e_\mu^{~a}$ are equal - up to a rescaling factor -
@vanproeyen ], that is the torsionless condition, $ R(P)=0 $ and an additional constraint on $ R(M)$. The two constraints accept an algebraic solution go to expressions of the fields $ \omega_\mu^{~ab}$ and $ f_\mu^{~a}$ in terms of the autonomous fields $ e_\mu^{~a}$ and $ b_\mu$. Also, the gauge pay back $ b_\mu=0 $ can be employed and, inclusion of all constraint in the initial action lead to the well - know Weyl action. 

 Besides the above breaking of the conformal symmetry which led to the Weyl action, it is possible to use an alternative breaking route, this prison term leading to an action with Lorentz symmetry, explicitly the Einstein - Hilbert action [ @Chamseddine:2002fd ]. From our prespective, the latter can be achieve through an alternative isotropy breaking mechanism, specifically with the inclusion of two scalar fields in the fundamental theatrical performance of the conformal group [ @Li:1973mq ], being a generalization of the case of the breaking of the 4 - d de Sitter group down to the Lorentz group by the inclusion of a scalar in the fundamental representation of SO(1,4), as explained in section \[einsteingravity\ ]. The inclusion of two scalars could trigger a spontaneous symmetry breaking in a theory with matter fields and the result action would be the Einstein - Hilbert one, respecting Lorentz isotropy. calculation and detail on this issue will be included in a future work. 

 Moreover, the argument used in the previous incision in the four - dimensional Poincaré gravity case, that is an alternative way to break the initial symmetry to the Lorentz, can be generalize for this case of conformal gravity. Since it is desired to result with the Lorentz isotropy out of the initial SO(2,4), the vacuum of the hypothesis is considered to be directly SO(4) invariant, which means that every other tensor, except for the $ R(M)$, has to be vanish. Setting these tensors to zero will produce the constraints of the theory leading to expressions that relate the bore fields. In particular, in [ @Chamseddine:2002fd ], it is argued that if both tensors $ R(P)$ and $ R(K)$ are simultaneously set to zero, then from the constraint of the theory it is understand that the corresponding bore fields, $ f_\mu^{~a }, e_\mu^{~a}$ are equal - up to a rescale factor -
 @vajproeyen], that is the torrionless conditnin, $R(P)=0$ end an zdditionxl constraint on $R(M)$. The two ronsrrainuf admit an algebrakc solutiln leadibg ti expressioia of thc fiemfs $\okxga_\mu^{~ab}$ and $f_\mu^{~s}$ in terms of the indepetddnc fields $e_\mu^{~a}$ and $b_\mu$. Also, the gauge fixing $b_\lu=0$ can be empljyed wnd, jnclusion of all constraints in ths initiel action lead yo the well-known Weyl actiln.

Bedides the above brfaking of tye cjbformal symmdtry which led to the Seyl action, it is possible to eoploy an alternqtuve treaking ronte, thps time leadikb to at actiom with Lorentz sykmerry, explicitly the Eiistein-Hilbert action [@Chamseddhnz:2002fd]. From our prespectuvw, the latder zqn ce zciiebed thgoujh an alterhative symmwtry breaking mechamifn, specificallg with tre inclusion of two scalar fields in tht funsamental representation of the conformal groop [@Li:1973mq], beyng a generalization of the case of the breaking mf thx 4-a dt Wittef ggoup down to the Lorentz group by the inclusijh pf a scalar in tme fundamental reptedemjation of SO(1,4), ar explcjnsd in section \[einsheingradity\]. Rhe inclufion of two scalars could triggwr a spontanvous symmetry breaking in a theorv with mattrr fields and the resulcing adtion would be the Ejvstein-Hilbert ond, rvspewting Lorentz symmetry. Calsulations and detailr on this yssue will be ikwluded in a future work.

Loseover, the argument used in the previous section in the fmur-gimensioual Polncaré gravity cwse, that is an alternctive day to brezk the mnitial symmqtry to the Lmtentz, can be jeneralizqd fir tyis casd of conformal bravity. Spnee it is eesired to result xith fhe Lorentz symnettt out of the imitkal SL(2,4), vhe vwwuum of the dheofy kx conridered to ne airevtly SO(4) invariant, whhch jeans that every oyhcr tensor, except sor the $R(M)$, hax to be vanishing. Dettiig there temsots to zero will produce the conatraints lf bhe theory lewdinn to expressious that relate the gauge fields. In partirular, in [@Chamseddine:2002fd], ut is argued that iy noth tensors $R(P)$ agd $R(K)$ are simultaneously set ro zero, then from the constraints of tge themry ih is understood that the corresponding gauge fields, $f_\mu^{~a}, e_\mu^{~a}$ are equal - yp to e wescaling fzctot -
@vanproeyen], that is the torsionless condition, $R(P)=0$ additional on $R(M)$. two constraints admit expressions the fields $\omega_\mu^{~ab}$ $f_\mu^{~a}$ in terms the independent fields $e_\mu^{~a}$ and $b_\mu$. the gauge fixing $b_\mu=0$ can be employed and, inclusion of all constraints in initial action lead to the well-known Weyl action. Besides the above breaking of conformal which to Weyl action, it is possible to employ an alternative breaking route, this time leading to an with Lorentz symmetry, explicitly the Einstein-Hilbert action [@Chamseddine:2002fd]. our prespective, the latter be achieved through an alternative breaking specifically with inclusion two fields in the representation of the conformal group [@Li:1973mq], being a generalization of the case of the breaking of the de Sitter to the group the of a scalar fundamental representation of SO(1,4), as explained The inclusion of two scalars could trigger a symmetry breaking a theory with matter fields and resulting action would be the Einstein-Hilbert one, respecting symmetry. Calculations and details on this issue will be included in a future work. Moreover, used in the previous in the four-dimensional gravity that an way to the initial symmetry to the Lorentz, can be generalized for this of conformal gravity. Since it is desired to result with symmetry of the initial the vacuum of the is to be directly SO(4) means every for $R(M)$, to be vanishing. Setting tensors to zero will produce constraints of the theory the gauge fields. In particular, in [@Chamseddine:2002fd], it argued that if both tensors $R(P)$ and are simultaneously set to zero, then from the constraints of the theory is understood corresponding gauge fields, $f_\mu^{~a}, e_\mu^{~a}$ are equal - to a rescaling factor
 @vanproeyen], that is the torsioNless condiTion, $R(p)=0$ anD an AdDitiOnal Constraint on $R(M)$. tHe twO constraints admit an algEbraiC sOLutiON lEadinG to exprESsIONs oF tHe FieLdS $\OmEga_\mu^{~Ab}$ aNd $f_\mu^{~a}$ iN terms of thE inDePendent fieldS $E_\mU^{~a}$ and $b_\mu$. AlSo, tHe gauge fixinG $b_\mU=0$ can be EmPloYEd and, IncLusioN of all COnstraInts in the InITial acTIon lead TO ThE welL-known Weyl action.

BESiDEs the above breaKing of ThE CoNFOrmAl sYmmetry whiCh Led to THe Weyl aCTiON, IT is POssible to emplOy an alternaTIve BreakiNg RouTE, this tIme leAdINg tO an action wiTh LoRentz symmEtry, exPLicitly THe EinstEin-HilBerT acTion [@cHaMsEddInE:2002Fd]. FROm Our PResPective, tHe LaTter cAn be ACHIEved ThrOugh An altErnative symmeTry BreaKIng MechaNism, sPeciFiCally With thE inclUsIon of two scalar fIeldS in the funDamEnTal RePreseNTation Of tHe cOnformaL group [@LI:1973Mq], bEiNG A GeNeralization of the cAsE OF tHe breakiNg of thE 4-D dE SITter grouP dOwn To thE lOrentZ groUP bY the inclUsion oF A sCaLar in thE fUndameNtAl rEprEsentATion Of SO(1,4), as ExplaineD in seCTion \[einsteingrAVity\]. The inclusIOn OF TwO ScalArs Could triggeR a spONtanEous SYmMetRY breaKing iN a THeORy with matter fields aNd The resUltinG action would bE the EinsteIN-hIlbert onE, resPEcTIng Lorentz symmEtry. CAlculationS And detaiLs on tHis issue Will be incLUDed in a fuTurE woRk.

MOreOVEr, The argument usED In thE pRevious SecTion in tHe fOur-DimEnsIoNal PoincaRé gravitY cAsE, tHaT is An altERnative wAy To bReAk tHe iniTIal symMetry To thE LOrENtz, Can be geNErALIzed FoR tHis cAse Of ConfoRmal GRavIty. SincE it is desiRed TO resUlT wIth the LOrentz symmetrY oUt of the iniTiAl So(2,4), the vaCUUm of the tHeory is considered to be diREctly SO(4) InvArianT, whiCh means thAt eVery otHer TEnsor, eXcept fOr the $r(M)$, Has TO Be vanISHiNg. SEtTing these tENSorS to zeRo Will Produce The constraints of thE TheOry leading to eXprEssiONS tHat RElATe tHe GAugE FIelds. In particulAr, in [@ChamseDdINe:2002Fd], it is arguED thAt If both tEnsors $R(p)$ and $R(k)$ Are simuLtaneouslY set to zerO, tHen fROM thE constrainTs of the tHeory it is UNdersTOoD that The CorresPoNdiNg gauGe fielDS, $f_\mU^{~a}, e_\mu^{~A}$ are eqUaL - up to a RescaLiNg factor -
 @vanproeyen], that is the  torsionle ss co ndi tio n,  $R( P)=0 $ and an addit i onal  constraint on $R(M)$.  Thetw o  con s tr aints  admita na l geb ra ic  so lu t io n lea din g to ex pressionsofth e fields $\o m eg a_\mu^{~ab }$and $f_\mu^{ ~a} $ in t er mso f the  in depen dent f i elds $ e_\mu^{~a }$ and $b _ \mu$. A l s o,  the  gauge fixing $b_ \ mu = 0$ can be empl oyed a nd ,  i n c lus ion  of all co ns train t s in th e  i n i t ial action lead t o the well- k now n Weyl  a cti o n.

Be sides  t h e a bove breaki ng o f the con formal symmetr y  whichled to  th e W eyla ct io n,it isp os sib l e t o employ  a nalter nati v e b reak ing  rou te, t his time lead ing  toa n a ction  with  Lor en tz sy mmetry , exp li citly the Einst ein- Hilbert a cti on  [@ Ch amsed d ine:20 02f d].  From o ur pres p ect iv e , th e latter can be ac hi e v ed  through  an al t er na t ive symm et rybrea k i ng me chan i sm , specif ically wi th  the in cl usionof  tw o s calar fiel ds inthe fund ament a l representati o n of the conf o rm a l  g r oup[@L i:1973mq],bein g  a g ener a li zat i on of  theca s eo f the breaking of t he  4-d d e Sit ter group dow n to the L o r e ntz grou p by th e  inclusion ofa sca lar in the fundamen tal r epresent ation ofS O (1,4), a s e xpl ain edi n  s ection \[eins t e ingr av ity\].The  inclus ion  of  tw o s ca lars coul d trigge rasp on tan eouss ymmetrybr eak in g i n a t h eory w ith m atte rfi e lds  and th e  r e s ulti ng  a ctio n w ou ld be  the Ein stein-H ilbert on e,r espe ct in g Loren tz symmetry.Ca lculations  a nddetail s on thisissue will be includedi n a fut ure  work .

M oreover,the  argum ent used i n theprevi ou s s e c tioni n  t hefo ur-dimensi o n alPoinc ar é gr avity c ase, that is an al t ern ative way tobre ak t h e  i nit i al sym me t ryt o  the Lorentz, c an be gene ra l iz ed for thi s  ca se  of con formalgravi t y. Sinc e it is d esired to  r esul t wit h the Lore ntz symm etry outo f the in itial  SO (2,4),  t hevacuu m of t h e t heory  is co ns idered  to b edirectly  SO(4) invariant, which  means  that  ev ery other  te n sor , exceptforthe $R(M)$ , h asto be  va n ishin g. S e tt ing these  ten s ors to ze r owil l pr oduce the c o n s tra intsoft he the oryleading to expres s ions that rela te t h e  ga uge fiel ds . In particula r,in [ @Chamsed di ne:2002fd],  it is a rg u ed th at ifboth t ensors$ R (P ) $ and$R(K )$are simul tan eo u sly set  t oz ero, t henfr om the  const r aint s of the theory it  is u n d ersto o d t hat t he  corres p ondi ng gauge f ields, $f_\ mu^{~a }, e _\mu^ {~a}$ a re  equal  -up  to a resc a ling fact or -
 @vanproeyen],_that is_the torsionless condition, $R(P)=0$_and an_additional_constraint on_$R(M)$._The two constraints_admit an algebraic_solution leading to expressions_of the fields_$\omega_\mu^{~ab}$_and $f_\mu^{~a}$ in terms of the independent fields $e_\mu^{~a}$ and $b_\mu$. Also, the gauge_fixing_$b_\mu=0$ can_be_employed_and, inclusion of all constraints_in the initial action lead_to the_well-known Weyl action.

Besides the above breaking of the_conformal_symmetry which led_to the Weyl action, it is possible to employ_an alternative breaking route, this time_leading to an_action_with_Lorentz symmetry, explicitly the_Einstein-Hilbert action [@Chamseddine:2002fd]. From our prespective,_the latter can be achieved through_an alternative symmetry breaking mechanism, specifically with_the inclusion of two scalar fields_in the fundamental representation of_the conformal_group [@Li:1973mq], being a generalization_of the case_of the_breaking of the_4-d de Sitter group down to_the Lorentz group_by the inclusion of a scalar_in_the fundamental representation_of_SO(1,4),_as explained_in section \[einsteingravity\]._The_inclusion of_two_scalars could trigger a spontaneous symmetry_breaking_in a theory with matter fields and_the resulting action would_be_the Einstein-Hilbert one, respecting_Lorentz symmetry. Calculations and details_on this issue will be included_in a_future work.

Moreover,_the argument used in the previous section in the four-dimensional Poincaré_gravity case, that is an alternative_way to break the_initial symmetry_to_the Lorentz, can_be_generalized for_this case of conformal gravity. Since it_is desired_to result with the Lorentz symmetry_out of the initial_SO(2,4),_the vacuum of the theory is_considered to be directly SO(4) invariant,_which means that every other_tensor,_except_for the $R(M)$, has to_be vanishing. Setting these tensors to_zero will produce_the constraints of the theory leading to_expressions_that relate the gauge fields. In_particular,_in [@Chamseddine:2002fd], it is argued that_if_both_tensors $R(P)$ and $R(K)$ are_simultaneously set to zero, then from_the constraints of the theory it is understood that_the corresponding gauge_fields, $f_\mu^{~a}, e_\mu^{~a}$ are equal_-_up_to a rescaling factor -