W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying the cyclic property of trace operation we can get, $$\begin{aligned}
f=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V].Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\\=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\end{aligned}$$ By using the definition in Eq.\[ex2\], in general the above equation can be written over the density matrix $(\rho)$, as below, $$f=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]\}^{2} \label{fe1}$$ Which leads, $$\sqrt{f}=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]=Tr[M] \label{ft1}$$ Here $M$ represent the density matrix after the complete evolution mentioned below, $$M=W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho \label{ce1}$$ The dimension of the matrix $M$ depends on the size of the Hilbert space, in which the density matrix $(\rho)$ exists. By utilizing the Eqs.\[d1\] and \[r1\], the Eq.\[ft1\] may be rewritten as, $$\sqrt{f}=Re[F(t)]\label{f1}$$ Putting the value of the above factor in Eq.\[is1\] we obtain the connection between QI scrambling and Uhlamann fidelity as below, $$\langle C(t) \rangle=2[1-\sqrt{f}] \label{es1}$$ The above equation shows that, the QI scrambling is the square root function of Ulhmann fidelity for pure states. Referring the Ref\[x\], we know the relation between Bures metric $(D)$ and Uhlamann fidelity as below, $$D=\sqrt{2(1-\sqrt{f})} \label{bm1}$$ Hence the Eq.\[es1\] can be re written as, $$\langle C(t) \rangle=D^{2} \label{bm2}$$ The above equation establish the connection between QI scrambling and Bures metric. We mention that, Bures metric is another measure of closeness of two quantum states and connected with Uhlmann fidelity. Here we find the QI scrambling is a square function with Bures metric. In the present work we only focus on Uhlamann fidelity as this has lucid properties and widely used in literature
W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying the cyclic property of trace operation we can draw, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 f = Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V].Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\\=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\end{aligned}$$ By use the definition in Eq.\[ex2\ ], in general the above equation can be written over the concentration matrix $ (\rho)$, as below, $ $ f=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]\}^{2 } \label{fe1}$$ Which leads, $ $ \sqrt{f}=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]=Tr[M ] \label{ft1}$$ Here $ M$ act the density matrix after the complete development mention below, $ $ megabyte = W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho \label{ce1}$$ The dimension of the matrix $ M$ depends on the size of the Hilbert distance, in which the concentration matrix $ (\rho)$ exists. By utilizing the Eqs.\[d1\ ] and \[r1\ ], the Eq.\[ft1\ ] may be rewrite as, $ $ \sqrt{f}=Re[F(t)]\label{f1}$$ Putting the value of the above factor in Eq.\[is1\ ] we receive the connection between QI scrambling and Uhlamann fidelity as below, $ $ \langle C(t) \rangle=2[1-\sqrt{f } ] \label{es1}$$ The above equality shows that, the QI scrambling is the square beginning function of Ulhmann fidelity for arrant states. Referring the Ref\[x\ ], we know the relation between Bures metric $ (D)$ and Uhlamann fidelity as downstairs, $ $ D=\sqrt{2(1-\sqrt{f }) } \label{bm1}$$ Hence the Eq.\[es1\ ] can be re written as, $ $ \langle C(t) \rangle = D^{2 } \label{bm2}$$ The above equation establish the connection between QI scrambling and Bures metric. We mention that, Bures metric is another measure of closeness of two quantum states and connected with Uhlmann fidelity. Here we find the QI scrambling is a square function with Bures metric. In the present employment we only focus on Uhlamann fidelity as this has lucid place and wide used in literature
W(t).V.A(t)]$$ Applying the cyclic pvoperty of trace operatmon we dan get, $$\cegin{aligned}
f=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V].Tr[W(t).V.W(t).T]\\=\{Tr[W(r).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\tud{aligned}$$ By using tfe defininion in Ew.\[ex2\], mn general the aukve equation dwn bz xritten over thg density madrix $(\rho)$, as benod, $$y=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]\}^{2} \label{fe1}$$ Which leads, $$\sqre{f}=Tr[W(t).V.E(t).G.\rho]=Tr[M] \label{fj1}$$ Hert $M$ repdvstnt the density matrix after the domplett evolution mentiomed below, $$M=W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho \label{fe1}$$ Tje dimension of thf matrix $M$ eepeges on the sixe of the Hilbert spacg, in which the density matrix $(\rhu)$ exixts. By utioizinh the Eqs.\[d1\] aid \[r1\], tre Eq.\[ft1\] may nv rewridten as, $$\sqrt{f}=Re[F(t)]\labek{f1}$$ 'uttung the value of the ebove factor in Eq.\[is1\] we obtait che connection betweeb WI sctamblhng xbd Jhlzmenn fidellty as below, $$\mangle C(t) \rqngle=2[1-\sqrt{f}] \label{es1}$$ Uhe qbove equatioh showf ehat, the QI scrambling is the square romt runction of Ulhmann fidwlity for pure states. Referrind the Ref\[x\], we know the relation between Bures metsic $(D)$ xnd Umlamxbn fidelity as below, $$D=\sqrt{2(1-\sqrt{f})} \label{bm1}$$ Hence trs Tq.\[ex1\] can be re wrltten as, $$\langle C(t) \rwnbje=D^{2} \label{bm2}$$ Tfe abors squation establish the cognectuon betwetn QI scrambling and Bures metrix. We mention rhat, Bures metric ns another mzasure of ckoseness of two quantum stafes and conjected wiff Uhlmann fideligy. Mera we find the QI scramblind is a sqnare yunction witn Buref metric. Ij the present work we onpy foeus ot Uhlamann fidelity as this has lucid pro'xrties and wiceny lsed in lnteratmre
W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying the cyclic property of trace can $$\begin{aligned} f=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V].Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\\=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\end{aligned}$$ using the definition above can be written the density matrix as below, $$f=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]\}^{2} \label{fe1}$$ Which leads, \label{ft1}$$ Here $M$ represent the density matrix after the complete evolution mentioned below, \label{ce1}$$ The dimension of the matrix $M$ depends on the size of the space, which density $(\rho)$ exists. By utilizing the Eqs.\[d1\] and \[r1\], the Eq.\[ft1\] may be rewritten as, $$\sqrt{f}=Re[F(t)]\label{f1}$$ Putting value of the above factor in Eq.\[is1\] we the connection between QI and Uhlamann fidelity as below, C(t) \label{es1}$$ The equation that, QI scrambling is square root function of Ulhmann fidelity for pure states. Referring the Ref\[x\], we know the relation between metric $(D)$ fidelity as $$D=\sqrt{2(1-\sqrt{f})} Hence Eq.\[es1\] can be as, $$\langle C(t) \rangle=D^{2} \label{bm2}$$ The the connection between QI scrambling and Bures metric. mention that, metric is another measure of closeness two quantum states and connected with Uhlmann fidelity. we find the QI scrambling is a square function with Bures metric. In the present only focus on Uhlamann as this has properties widely in
W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying the cyclic proPerty of traCe opeRatIon We Can gEt, $$\beGin{aligned}
f=Tr[W(T).v.W(t).V].tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\\=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\end{aliGned}$$ BY uSIng tHE dEfiniTion in EQ.\[Ex2\], IN GenErAl The AbOVe EquatIon Can be wrItten over tHe dEnSity matrix $(\rhO)$, As Below, $$f=\{Tr[W(t).v.W(t).v.\rho]\}^{2} \label{fe1}$$ WHicH leads, $$\SqRt{f}=tR[W(t).V.W(T).V.\rHo]=Tr[M] \Label{fT1}$$ here $M$ rEpresent tHe DEnsity MAtrix afTER tHe coMplete evolution meNTiONed below, $$M=W(t).V.W(t).v.\rho \laBeL{Ce1}$$ tHE diMenSion of the mAtRix $M$ dEPends on THe SIZE of THe Hilbert spacE, in which the DEnsIty matRiX $(\rhO)$ Exists. by utiLiZIng The Eqs.\[d1\] and \[r1\], The EQ.\[ft1\] may be rEwrittEN as, $$\sqrt{F}=re[F(t)]\labEl{f1}$$ PutTinG thE valUE oF tHe aBoVE faCToR in eQ.\[is1\] We obtain ThE cOnnecTion BETWEen Qi scRambLing aNd Uhlamann fidEliTy as BEloW, $$\langLe C(t) \rAnglE=2[1-\sQrt{f}] \lAbel{es1}$$ the abOvE equation shows tHat, tHe QI scramBliNg Is tHe SquarE Root fuNctIon Of UlhmaNn fidelITy fOr PURE sTates. Referring the REf\[X\], WE kNow the reLation BEtWeEN Bures meTrIc $(D)$ And UHLAmann FideLItY as below, $$d=\sqrt{2(1-\sQRt{F})} \lAbel{bm1}$$ HEnCe the EQ.\[eS1\] caN be Re wriTTen aS, $$\langlE C(t) \ranglE=D^{2} \labEL{bm2}$$ The above equATion establish THe CONnECtioN beTween QI scraMbliNG and bureS MeTriC. we menTion tHaT, buREs metric is another meAsUre of cLosenEss of two quantUm states anD CONnected wIth UHLmANn fidelity. Here We finD the QI scraMBling is a SquarE functioN with BureS MEtric. In tHe pResEnt WorK WE oNly focus on UhlAMAnn fIdElity as ThiS has lucId pRopErtIes AnD widely usEd in liteRaTuRe
W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying th e cyclic p roper tyoftr aceoper ation we can g e t, $ $\begin{aligned}
f=Tr[ W(t). V. W (t). V ]. Tr[W( t).V.W( t ). V ] \\= \{ Tr [W( t) . V. W(t). V]\ }^{2}\e nd{aligned }$$  B y using thed ef inition in  Eq .\[ex2\], in  ge neralth e a b ove e qua tioncan be writte n over th ed ensity matrix$ ( \r ho)$ , as below, $$f=\ { Tr [ W(t).V.W(t).V. \rho]\ }^ { 2} \ lab el{ fe1}$$ Whi ch  lead s , $$\sq r t{ f } = Tr[ W (t).V.W(t).V. \rho]=Tr[M] \la bel{ft 1} $$H ere $M $ rep re s ent  the densit y ma trix afte r thec omplete evoluti on men tio ned  bel o w,  $ $M= W( t ).V . W( t). V .\r ho \labe l{ ce 1}$$Thed i m e nsio n o f th e mat rix $M$ depen dson t h e s ize o f the  Hil be rt sp ace, i n whi ch  the density ma trix  $(\rho)$  ex is ts.  B y uti l izingthe  Eq s.\[d1\ ] and \ [ r1\ ], t h eEq.\[ft1\] may bere w r it ten as,$$\sqr t {f }= R e[F(t)]\ la bel {f1} $ $  Putt ingt he  value o f thea bo ve  factor  i n Eq.\ [i s1\ ] w e obt a in t he con nectionbetwe e n QI scramblin g  and Uhlamann fi d e li t y as  be low, $$\lan gleC (t)\ran g le =2[ 1 -\sqr t{f}]  \ l ab e l{es1}$$ The aboveeq uation  show s that, the Q I scrambli n g is the s quar e  r o ot function of  Ulhm ann fideli t y for pu re st ates. Re ferring t h e  Ref\[x\ ],wekno w t h e  r elation betwe e n  Bur es  metric  $( D)$ and  Uh lam ann  fi de lity as b elow, $$ D= \s qr t{ 2(1 -\sqr t {f})} \l ab el{ bm 1}$ $ Hen c e theEq.\[ es1\ ]ca n  be  re wri t te n as,$$ \l angl e C (t ) \ra ngle = D^{ 2} \lab el{bm2}$$  Th e  abo ve  e quation  establish th econnection  b etw een QI s cramblin g and Bures metric. Wem entiontha t, Bu resmetric is  an othermea s ure of  close nessof  tw o quant u m  s tat es  and conne c t edwithUh lman n fidel ity. Here we findt heQI scrambling  is  a s q u ar e f u nc t ion  w i thB u res metric. Inthe presen tw or k we onlyf ocu son Uhla mann fi delit y  as thi s has luc id proper ti es a n d  wi dely usedin liter ature
W(t).V.W(t)]$$ Applying_the cyclic_property of trace operation_we can_get,_$$\begin{aligned}
f=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V].Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\\=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V]\}^{2}\end{aligned}$$ By_using_the definition in_Eq.\[ex2\], in general_the above equation can_be written over_the_density matrix $(\rho)$, as below, $$f=\{Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]\}^{2} \label{fe1}$$ Which leads, $$\sqrt{f}=Tr[W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho]=Tr[M] \label{ft1}$$ Here $M$ represent_the_density matrix_after_the_complete evolution mentioned below, $$M=W(t).V.W(t).V.\rho_\label{ce1}$$ The dimension of the_matrix $M$_depends on the size of the Hilbert space,_in_which the density_matrix $(\rho)$ exists. By utilizing the Eqs.\[d1\] and \[r1\],_the Eq.\[ft1\] may be rewritten as,_$$\sqrt{f}=Re[F(t)]\label{f1}$$ Putting the_value_of_the above factor in_Eq.\[is1\] we obtain the connection between_QI scrambling and Uhlamann fidelity as_below, $$\langle C(t) \rangle=2[1-\sqrt{f}] \label{es1}$$ The above_equation shows that, the QI scrambling_is the square root function_of Ulhmann_fidelity for pure states. Referring_the Ref\[x\], we_know the_relation between Bures_metric $(D)$ and Uhlamann fidelity as_below, $$D=\sqrt{2(1-\sqrt{f})} \label{bm1}$$_Hence the Eq.\[es1\] can be re_written_as, $$\langle C(t)_\rangle=D^{2}_\label{bm2}$$_The above_equation establish the_connection_between QI_scrambling_and Bures metric. We mention that,_Bures_metric is another measure of closeness of_two quantum states and_connected_with Uhlmann fidelity. Here_we find the QI scrambling_is a square function with Bures_metric. In_the present_work we only focus on Uhlamann fidelity as this has lucid_properties and widely used in literature