}^{(-)}_{\rm NLL} 
    \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, C_A} {\mathcal{M}}^{\rm (tree)}
    +e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, {\mathbf{T}}_t^2} {\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s}, \\
    \label{getH2-h}
    {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h} &= {\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}\,,\end{aligned}$$

where in (\[getH2-h\]) we neglected positive powers of $\epsilon$ originating in the expansion of $(1-B_0(\epsilon))$, using the fact that ${\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}$ is itself finite. Of course such a simplification cannot be applied to (\[getH2-s\]) where there is an interplay between positive powers of $\epsilon$ and negative ones. In section \[sec:softAmpl\] we have determined the reduced soft amplitude, thus we are in a position to explicitly write down the soft part of the infrared-renormalized amplitude at $\epsilon\to 0$, according to [eq. ]{}. Inserting eqs. (\[Znll\]) and (\[ReducedAmpNLLresum2\]) into [eq. ]{} we get $$\begin{gathered}
\label{getH3}
    {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s} = i\pi \Bigg\{ 
    - e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, C_A} 
    \bigg[\frac{ e^{\frac{x}{2{\epsilon}} ({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}
    \left( 1 - \frac{C_A}{C_A -{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2}} R({\epsilon}) \right)^{-1} \bigg]_{\rm poles} \\ 
    +e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, {\mathbf{T}}_t^2} 
    \Bigg[ \frac{e^{\frac{B_0}{2{\epsilon}} x {C_2
} ^{(-)}_{\rm NLL } 
     \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon } } \, x \, C_A } { \mathcal{M}}^{\rm (tree) } 
     + e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon } } \, x \, { \mathbf{T}}_t^2 } { \cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, s }, \\ 
     \label{getH2 - h } 
     { \mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, h } & = { \cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, h}\,,\end{aligned}$$ 

 where in (\[getH2 - h\ ]) we neglected positive powers of $ \epsilon$ originating in the expansion of $ (1 - B_0(\epsilon))$, use the fact that $ { \cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, h}$ is itself finite. Of naturally such a simplification cannot be applied to (\[getH2 - s\ ]) where there be an interplay between plus powers of $ \epsilon$ and negative one. In department \[sec: softAmpl\ ] we have determined the reduced soft amplitude, thus we are in a situation to explicitly write down the soft character of the infrared - renormalized amplitude at $ \epsilon\to 0 $, according to [ eq.   ] { }. Inserting eqs.   (\[Znll\ ]) and (\[ReducedAmpNLLresum2\ ]) into [ eq.   ] { } we get $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \label{getH3 } 
     { \mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, s } = i\pi \Bigg\ { 
     - e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon } } \, x \, C_A } 
     \bigg[\frac { e^{\frac{x}{2{\epsilon } } ({ C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2 }) } 
     \left (1 - \frac{C_A}{C_A -{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2 } } R({\epsilon }) \right)^{-1 } \bigg]_{\rm poles } \\ 
     + e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon } } \, x \, { \mathbf{T}}_t^2 } 
     \Bigg [ \frac{e^{\frac{B_0}{2{\epsilon } } x { C_2
}^{(-)}_{\rm JLL} 
    \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\eprilon}} \, x \, C_A} {\majhxal{M}}^{\rm (tree)}
    +e^{\frac{C_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, {\mathbf{T}}_t^2} {\cql \hau M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s}, \\
    \labeu{getH2-h}
    {\mathcal{Y}}^{(+)}_{\rm ILL,h} &= {\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}\,,\end{alignsf}$$

whexe in (\[getH2-h\]) we ngglected poshtive powers ox $\dpdilon$ originating in the expansion jf $(1-B_0(\epsolln))$, using the fwct uhae ${\cam \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}$ is itself finite. Of course such a simplofication cannot be applief to (\[getH2-s\]) where there is an intetllar between posktive powegv of $\epsilkn$ and negative ones. In section \[sec:spftAmpl\] we hqve getermined vhe requced soft amplitude, thus wr are in a posltion to explicitly write dowi the soft part of tre infrarad-xenormalized amplitudw qt $\epvilot\to 0$, qccurdjnj tk [eq. ]{}. Ijsecting eqs. (\[Znml\]) and (\[ReduxedAmpNLLresum2\]) into [ez. ]{} we get $$\begin{fatherqd}
\jabel{getH3}
    {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s} = i\pi \Bigg\{ 
    - e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, C_A} 
    \bigg[\frac{ e^{\vrac{x}{2{\epsijon}} ({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}
    \left( 1 - \frac{C_A}{C_A -{{\mathtf{T}}_t^2}} C({\eosiook}) \rieyt)^{-1} \bigg]_{\rm poles} \\ 
    +e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, {\mwfhnf{N}}_t^2} 
    \Bigg[ \frac{e^{\nrac{B_0}{2{\epsilon}} x {C_2
}^{(-)}_{\rm NLL} \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, (tree)} \, x {\mathbf{T}}_t^2} {\cal \hat NLL,h} {\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm where in (\[getH2-h\]) neglected positive powers of $\epsilon$ originating the expansion of $(1-B_0(\epsilon))$, using the fact that ${\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}$ is finite. Of course such a simplification cannot be applied to (\[getH2-s\]) where there an between powers $\epsilon$ and negative ones. In section \[sec:softAmpl\] we have determined the reduced soft amplitude, thus we in a position to explicitly write down the part of the infrared-renormalized at $\epsilon\to 0$, according to ]{}. eqs. (\[Znll\]) (\[ReducedAmpNLLresum2\]) [eq. we get $$\begin{gathered} {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s} = i\pi \Bigg\{ - e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \, C_A} \bigg[\frac{ e^{\frac{x}{2{\epsilon}} ({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})} \left( 1 - -{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2}} R({\epsilon}) poles} \\ \, \, \Bigg[ \frac{e^{\frac{B_0}{2{\epsilon}} x
}^{(-)}_{\rm NLL} 
    \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, X \, C_A} {\mathcal{m}}^{\rm (trEe)}
    +e^{\FraC{B_0({\EpsiLon})-1}{2{\ePsilon}} \, x \, {\mathbf{T}}_T^2} {\Cal \hAt M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s}, \\
    \label{getH2-h}
    {\matHcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\Rm nlL,h} &= {\cAL \hAt M}^{(+)}_{\rm nLL,h}\,,\end{ALiGNEd}$$

wHeRe In (\[gEth2-H\]) wE neglEctEd positIve powers oF $\epSiLon$ originatiNG iN the expansIon Of $(1-B_0(\epsilon))$, usIng The facT tHat ${\CAl \hat m}^{(+)}_{\rm nLL,h}$ iS itselF Finite. of course sUcH A simplIFicatioN CAnNot bE applied to (\[getH2-s\]) whERe THere is an interpLay betWeEN pOSItiVe pOwers of $\epsIlOn$ and NEgative ONeS. iN SecTIon \[sec:softAmpL\] we have deteRMinEd the rEdUceD Soft amPlituDe, THus We are in a posItioN to explicItly wrITe down tHE soft paRt of thE inFraRed-rENoRmAliZeD AmpLItUde AT $\epSilon\to 0$, aCcOrDing tO [eq. ]{}. INSERTing Eqs. (\[znll\]) And (\[ReDucedAmpNLLreSum2\]) Into [EQ. ]{} we Get $$\beGin{gaTherEd}
\Label{GetH3}
    {\maThcal{h}}^{(+)}_{\rM NLL,s} = i\pi \Bigg\{ 
    - e^{\frAc{{B_{0}}({\ePsilon})-1}{2{\epsIloN}} \, x \, c_A} 
    \bIgG[\frac{ E^{\Frac{x}{2{\ePsiLon}} ({c_{A}}-{{\mathbF{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mAThbF{T}}_T^2})}
    \LEFt( 1 - \Frac{C_A}{C_A -{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2}} R({\ePsILOn}) \Right)^{-1} \bigG]_{\rm polES} \\ 
    +e^{\FrAC{B_0({\epsiloN})-1}{2{\ePsiLon}} \, x \, {\MAThbf{T}}_T^2} 
    \BigG[ \FrAc{e^{\frac{B_0}{2{\EpsiloN}} X {C_2
}^{(-)}_{\rm NLL} 
    \,e^{\frac{{ B_{0} }({ \ep si lon} )-1} {2{\epsilon}}\ , x\, C_A} {\mathcal{M}}^ {\rm(t r ee)}    +e^ {\frac{ B _0 ( { \ep si lo n}) -1 } {2 {\eps ilo n}} \,x \, {\mat hbf {T }}_t^2} {\ca l  \ hat M}^{(+ )}_ {\rm NLL,s},  \\ 
    \ la bel { getH2 -h} 
   {\math c al{H}} ^{(+)}_{\ rm NLL,h} &= {\ca l \h at M }^{(+)}_{\rm NLL, h }\ , ,\end{aligned} $$

wh er e  i n (\[ get H2-h\]) we  n eglec t ed posi t iv e p owe r s of $\epsilo n$ originat i ngin the  e xpa n sion o f $(1 -B _ 0(\ epsilon))$,  usi ng the fa ct tha t  ${\cal \hat M} ^{(+)} _{\ rmNLL, h }$  i s i ts e lff in ite .  Of  coursesu ch  a si mpli f i c a tion  ca nnot  be a pplied to (\[ get H2-s \ ])where  ther e is  a n int erplay  betw ee n positive powe rs o f $\epsil on$  a ndne gativ e  ones.  In  se ction \ [sec:so f tAm pl \ ] we  have determined t he r ed uced sof t ampl i tu de ,  thus we  a rein a p ositi on t o  e xplicitl y writ e  d ow n the s of t part  o f t heinfra r ed-r enorma lized am plitu d e at $\epsilon \ to 0$, accord i ng t o[ eq.]{} . Inserting  eqs .  (\[ Znll \ ])  an d  (\[R educe dA m pN L Lresum2\]) into [eq .]{} we  get$$\begin{gath ered}
\lab e l { getH3}
   { \ ma t hcal{H}}^{(+)} _{\rm  NLL,s} =i \pi \Big g\{     - e^ {\frac{{B _ { 0}}({\ep sil on} )-1 }{2 { \ ep silon}} \, x\ ,  C_A }
    \b igg [\frac{  e^ {\f rac {x} {2 {\epsilon }} ({C_{ A} }- {{ \m ath bf{T} } _t^2})}} {L ({C _{ A}} -{{\m a thbf{T }}_t^ 2})} 
 \le ft( 1 - \f r a c{C_ A} {C _A - {{\ ma thbf{ T}}_ t ^2} } R({\e psilon})\ri g ht)^ {- 1}  \bigg] _{\rm poles}\\  
    +e^{ \f rac {B_0({ \ e psilon}) -1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x \ ,  {\math bf{ T}}_t ^2}
    \Big g[\frac{ e^{ \ frac{B _0}{2{ \epsi lo n}} x  {C_2 
}^{(-)}_{\rm NLL}_
 _  \, e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}}_\, x_\,_C_A} {\mathcal{M}}^{\rm_(tree)}
_  _+e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x_\, {\mathbf{T}}_t^2} {\cal \hat_M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,s}, \\
__  \label{getH2-h}
    {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h} &= {\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}\,,\end{aligned}$$

where in_(\[getH2-h\])_we neglected_positive_powers_of $\epsilon$ originating in the_expansion of $(1-B_0(\epsilon))$, using the_fact that_${\cal \hat M}^{(+)}_{\rm NLL,h}$ is itself finite. Of_course_such a simplification_cannot be applied to (\[getH2-s\]) where there is an_interplay between positive powers of $\epsilon$_and negative ones._In_section_\[sec:softAmpl\] we have determined_the reduced soft amplitude, thus we_are in a position to explicitly_write down the soft part of the_infrared-renormalized amplitude at $\epsilon\to 0$, according_to [eq. ]{}. Inserting eqs. (\[Znll\]) and_(\[ReducedAmpNLLresum2\]) into_[eq. ]{} we get $$\begin{gathered}
\label{getH3}
 _  {\mathcal{H}}^{(+)}_{\rm_NLL,s} =_i\pi \Bigg\{ 
_   - e^{\frac{{B_{0}}({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \,_x \, C_A}_
    \bigg[\frac{ e^{\frac{x}{2{\epsilon}}_({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}}{L({C_{A}}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}
_  _\left(_1_- \frac{C_A}{C_A_-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2}} R({\epsilon}) \right)^{-1}_\bigg]_{\rm_poles} \\_
_   +e^{\frac{B_0({\epsilon})-1}{2{\epsilon}} \, x_\,_{\mathbf{T}}_t^2} 
    \Bigg[ \frac{e^{\frac{B_0}{2{\epsilon}}_x {C_2