2k(4k,1)) \[4n\] Indeed, we now assert that this limit corresponds to the following direct sum of four ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations 22:= \_[n]{}(4n,1)\^[3]{} \[def4n\] whose decompositions in terms of Virasoro-irreducible representations read  = \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1),  = \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\] Since the participating Virasoro representations all are of rank 1, the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations $\ketw{2,1}$ and $\ketw{4,1}$ themselves are of rank 1.

Without going into details, this separation or disentanglement of the triple fusion into four ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations can be made manifest from the lattice by separating the set of link states accordingly. Since no non-trivial Jordan cells are formed between the representations on the right-hand side of (\[4n\]), selecting the link states associated to either $\ketw{2,1}$ or $\ketw{4,1}$ is a valid procedure. When non-trivial Jordan cells are involved, on the other hand, such a selection may affect the distribution and ranks of the cells and hence would not be valid.

Having identified $\ketw{2,1}$ and $\ketw{4,1}$, we now define the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable rank-2 representations := (2,1), := (2,1) \[R2121\] Their decompositions into Virasoro-indecomposable rank-2 representations are given in (\[Rr2\]). Of importance for the evaluation of fusion products below, we note that the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations (\[2141\]) and (\[R2121\]) have the stability properties (4n,1) = 2n, (4n,1) = 4n4n and (2,1) = (2,1) =  22 As we will see in the following, there are many more such properties, but this list suffices for now.

From the lattice, we define the ${\cal W}$-extended fusion product $\hat\otimes$ by {22}:=  \_[n]{}()\^3(4n,1)\^[3]{} and obtain the fusions given in Figure \[hor
2k(4k,1) ) \[4n\ ] Indeed, we now assert that this limit corresponds to the follow lineal sum of four $ { \cal W}$-indecomposable representations 22:=   \_[n]{}(4n,1)\^[3 ] { } \[def4n\ ] whose decomposition in price of Virasoro - irreducible representations read   =   \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1),   =   \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\ ] Since the enter Virasoro representation all are of rank 1, the $ { \cal W}$-indecomposable representations $ \ketw{2,1}$ and $ \ketw{4,1}$ themselves are of rank 1. 

 Without going into detail, this separation or disentanglement of the treble coalition into four $ { \cal W}$-indecomposable representations can be made apparent from the lattice by separate the stage set of link states accordingly. Since no non - superficial Jordan cells are formed between the representations on the right - hired hand side of (\[4n\ ]), selecting the link states associated to either $ \ketw{2,1}$ or $ \ketw{4,1}$ is a valid operation. When non - trivial Jordan cells are involved, on the other hand, such a selection may affect the distribution and ranks of the cells and hence would not be valid. 

 Having identified $ \ketw{2,1}$ and $ \ketw{4,1}$, we now define the $ { \cal W}$-indecomposable rank-2 representations: =   (2,1), : =   (2,1) \[R2121\ ] Their decompositions into Virasoro - indecomposable rank-2 representations are given in (\[Rr2\ ]). Of importance for the evaluation of coalition merchandise below, we notice that the $ { \cal W}$-indecomposable representation (\[2141\ ]) and (\[R2121\ ]) have the stability properties (4n,1)   =   2n, (4n,1)   =   4n4n and (2,1)   =   (2,1)   =    22 As we will determine in the following, there are many more such properties, but this list suffice for now. 

 From the lattice, we define the $ { \cal W}$-extended fusion product $ \hat\otimes$ by { 22}:=    \_[n]{}()\^3(4n,1)\^[3 ] { } and obtain the fusions given in Figure \[hor
2k(4k,1)) \[4j\] Indeed, we now assert tmat this limit correspoids to fhe folluwing direct sum of four ${\cal W}$-undecimposable representatiuns 22:= \_[n]{}(4n,1)\^[3]{} \[dev4n\] whose decinpositions in terms of Vjvasorm-mrreducible reptesentations read  = \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1),  = \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\] Sknee the participating Virasoro represqntatioms all are of ragk 1, uhe ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations $\kstw{2,1}$ and $\ketw{4,1}$ themselfes are of rank 1.

Without golng lnto details, this deparation ir dywentanglemeng of the tgnple fusion into four ${\cal W}$-indecomposable feprexentations cqn hg made manifxst frjm the lattigv by se[aratinb the set of llnk svatew accordingly. Since nm non-trivial Jordag cells ase formed between tye reprgsentdtiovw ov tge rjght-hajd aide of (\[4n\]), aelecting tye link states assoviwnrd to either $\ketw{2,1}$ jr $\ketw{4,1}$ is a valid procedure. When non-trivpal Nordan cells are involvwd, on the other hand, duch a sejection may affect the distribution and ranks of dhe cxlus ckq yejce would not be valid.

Having identified $\ketw{2,1}$ whd $\kvtw{4,1}$, we now define the ${\cal W}$-imdfcpiposable rank-2 represenfations := (2,1), := (2,1) \[R2121\] Their fecompofitiobs into Vyraspro-indecomposable rank-2 reprwsentations cre given in (\[Rr2\]). Of im'ortance for the evaliation of fusion produccs belkw, we note hhat the ${\dxl W}$-indecomposabue geprasentations (\[2141\]) and (\[R2121\]) have thq stabilivy prppertier (4n,1) = 2n, (4n,1) = 4n4n agd (2,1) = (2,1) =  22 As we will see in the followijg, thgre ara many morf such properties, but this list suffices for mof.

Frmm the lcttice, we define thq ${\cal W}$-extendeb fusion prodjct $\hat\otijes$ by {22}:=  \_[n]{}()\^3(4n,1)\^[3]{} and obtwin the fusiotd given in Fmgure \[hor
2k(4k,1)) \[4n\] Indeed, we now assert that corresponds the following sum of four \[def4n\] decompositions in terms Virasoro-irreducible representations read \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1), = \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\] Since the Virasoro representations all are of rank 1, the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations $\ketw{2,1}$ and themselves are of rank 1. Without going into details, this separation or disentanglement the fusion four W}$-indecomposable representations can be made manifest from the lattice by separating the set of link states Since no non-trivial Jordan cells are formed between representations on the right-hand of (\[4n\]), selecting the link associated either $\ketw{2,1}$ $\ketw{4,1}$ a procedure. When non-trivial cells are involved, on the other hand, such a selection may affect the distribution and ranks of cells and not be Having $\ketw{2,1}$ $\ketw{4,1}$, we now ${\cal W}$-indecomposable rank-2 representations := (2,1), Their decompositions into Virasoro-indecomposable rank-2 representations are given (\[Rr2\]). Of for the evaluation of fusion products we note that the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations (\[2141\]) (\[R2121\]) have the stability properties (4n,1) = 2n, (4n,1) = 4n4n and (2,1) = (2,1) As we will see the following, there many such but list suffices now. From the lattice, we define the ${\cal W}$-extended fusion product by {22}:= \_[n]{}()\^3(4n,1)\^[3]{} and obtain the fusions given in Figure
2k(4k,1)) \[4n\] Indeed, we now assert that tHis limit coRrespOndS to ThE folLowiNg direct sum of fOUr ${\caL W}$-indecomposable represEntatIoNS 22:= \_[n]{}(4n,1)\^[3]{} \[dEF4n\] Whose DecompoSItIONs iN tErMs oF VIRaSoro-iRreDucible RepresentaTioNs Read  = \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1),  = \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\] SiNCe The particiPatIng Virasoro rEprEsentaTiOns ALl are Of rAnk 1, thE ${\cal W}$-iNDecompOsable repReSEntatiONs $\ketw{2,1}$ aND $\KeTw{4,1}$ thEmselves are of rank 1.

wItHOut going into deTails, tHiS SePARatIon Or disentanGlEment OF the triPLe FUSIon INto four ${\cal W}$-inDecomposablE RepResentAtIonS Can be mAde maNiFEst From the lattIce bY separatiNg the sET of link STates acCordinGly. sinCe no NOn-TrIviAl jOrdAN cEllS Are Formed beTwEeN the rEpreSENTAtioNs oN the Right-Hand side of (\[4n\]), seLecTing THe lInk stAtes aSsocIaTed to Either $\Ketw{2,1}$ oR $\kEtw{4,1}$ is a valid procEdurE. When non-tRivIaL JoRdAn celLS are inVolVed, On the otHer hand, SUch A sELECtIon may affect the disTrIBUtIon and raNks of tHE cElLS and hencE wOulD not BE Valid.

haviNG iDentifieD $\ketw{2,1}$ aND $\kEtW{4,1}$, we now dEfIne the ${\CaL W}$-iNdeCompoSAble Rank-2 rePresentaTions := (2,1), := (2,1) \[r2121\] their decomposiTIons into VirasORo-INDeCOmpoSabLe rank-2 repreSentATionS are GIvEn iN (\[rr2\]). Of iMportAnCE fOR the evaluation of fusIoN produCts beLow, we note that The ${\cal W}$-indECOMposable ReprESeNTations (\[2141\]) and (\[R2121\]) havE the sTability prOPerties (4n,1) = 2N, (4n,1) = 4n4n aNd (2,1) = (2,1) =  22 As we wiLl see in thE FOllowing, TheRe aRe mAny MORe Such propertieS, BUt thIs List sufFicEs for noW.

FrOm tHe lAttIcE, we define The ${\cal W}$-eXtEnDeD fUsiOn proDUct $\hat\otImEs$ bY {22}:=  \_[n]{}()\^3(4N,1)\^[3]{} anD obtaIN the fuSions GiveN iN FIGurE \[hor
2k(4k,1)) \[4n\] Indeed, w e now asse rt th atthi slimi t co rresponds to t h e fo llowing direct sum offour${ \ calW }$ -inde composa b le r epr es en tat io n s22:=\_[ n]{}(4n ,1)\^[3]{}  \[ de f4n\] whosed ec omposition s i n terms of V ira soro-i rr edu c iblerep resen tation s  read = \_[k]{ }( 2 k-1)(4 k -2,1),=  \ _[k] {}2k(4k,1) \[2141 \ ]S ince the parti cipati ng Vi r a sor o r epresentat io ns al l  are of ra n k 1,t he ${\cal W}$ -indecompos a ble  repre se nta t ions $ \ketw {2 , 1}$  and $\ketw {4,1 }$ themse lves a r e of ra n k 1.

W ithout  go ing  int o  d et ail s, thi s  s epa r ati on or di se nt angle ment o f thetri plefusio n into four $ {\c al W } $-i ndeco mposa blere prese ntatio ns ca nbe made manifes t fr om the la tti ce  by  s epara t ing th e s etof link  states acc or d i n gl y. Since no non-tr iv i a lJordan c ells a r efo r med betw ee n t he r e p resen tati o ns  on theright- h an dside of  ( \[4n\] ),  se lec tingt he l ink st ates ass ociat e d to either $\ k etw{2,1}$ or$ \k e t w{ 4 ,1}$  is  a valid pr oced u re.When no n-t r ivial  Jord an ce l ls are involved, on  t he oth er ha nd, such a se lection ma y a ffect th e di s tr i bution and ran ks of  the cells and henc e wou ld not b e valid.H aving id ent ifi ed$\k e t w{ 2,1}$ and $\k e t w{4, 1} $, we n owdefinethe  ${ \ca l W }$ -indecomp osable r an k- 2re pre senta t ions :=(2 ,1) ,:=(2,1) \[R212 1\] T heir  d ec o mpo sitions in t o  Vir as or o-in dec om posab le r a nk- 2 repre sentation s a r e gi ve nin (\[R r2\]). Of imp or tance forth e e valuat i o n of fus ion products below, wen ote tha t t he ${ \cal  W}$-inde com posabl e r e presen tation s (\[ 21 41\ ] )  and( \ [R 212 1\ ]) have th e sta bilit yprop erties(4n,1) = 2n, (4n,1 )  =4n4n and (2,1 ) =  (2, 1 )  =   2 2  A s  we  w i lls e e in the follow ing, there  a r emany mores uch  p roperti es, but  this list su ffices fo r now.

F ro m th e lat tice, we d efine th e ${\calW }$-ex t en ded f usi on pro du ct$\hat \otime s $ b y {22 }:=  \ _[ n]{}() \^3(4 n, 1)\^[3]{ } and obtain the fusion s give n inFig ure \[hor 
2k(4k,1)) \[4n\]_Indeed, we_now assert that this_limit corresponds_to_the following_direct_sum of four_${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations_22:= \_[n]{}(4n,1)\^[3]{} \[def4n\] whose decompositions_in terms of_Virasoro-irreducible_representations read  = \_[k]{}(2k-1)(4k-2,1),  = \_[k]{}2k(4k,1) \[2141\] Since the participating Virasoro representations all are of rank_1,_the ${\cal_W}$-indecomposable_representations_$\ketw{2,1}$ and $\ketw{4,1}$ themselves are_of rank 1.

Without going into_details, this_separation or disentanglement of the triple fusion into_four_${\cal W}$-indecomposable representations_can be made manifest from the lattice by separating_the set of link states accordingly._Since no non-trivial_Jordan_cells_are formed between the_representations on the right-hand side of_(\[4n\]), selecting the link states associated_to either $\ketw{2,1}$ or $\ketw{4,1}$ is a_valid procedure. When non-trivial Jordan cells_are involved, on the other_hand, such_a selection may affect the_distribution and ranks_of the_cells and hence_would not be valid.

Having identified $\ketw{2,1}$_and $\ketw{4,1}$, we_now define the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable rank-2_representations_:= (2,1), := (2,1) \[R2121\]_Their_decompositions_into Virasoro-indecomposable_rank-2 representations are_given_in (\[Rr2\])._Of_importance for the evaluation of fusion_products_below, we note that the ${\cal W}$-indecomposable_representations (\[2141\]) and (\[R2121\])_have_the stability properties (4n,1) = 2n,_(4n,1) = 4n4n and (2,1) = (2,1) =  22 As_we will see in the following,_there are_many more_such properties, but this list suffices for now.

From the lattice, we_define the ${\cal W}$-extended fusion product_$\hat\otimes$ by {22}:=  \_[n]{}()\^3(4n,1)\^[3]{}_and obtain_the_fusions given in_Figure_\[hor