 of the dynamo beyond this thermal adjustment period.

In addition to normal convective cooling, volcanic heat loss can potentially extend core cooling beyond the thermal adjustment period on a stagnant lid planet, provided most of the melt can reach the surface of the planet and cool [@morgan1983; @nakagawa2012; @armann2012; @Driscoll2014]. Obviously, magmatic heat loss was not efficient enough for Venus, Mars, or the Moon to sustain dynamos, so we are left with the tentative conclusion that a stagnant lid reduces both the long-term convective and volcanic mantle heat loss.

![Comparison of the predicted thermal (A) and magnetic (B) histories of Earth (solid) and Venus (dashed). The only difference between the models is the Earth model uses a mobile lid heat flow scaling while the Venus model uses a stagnant lid scaling (see (\[q\_cmb\])-(\[q\_conv\]); @Driscoll2014 contains additional details).[]{data-label="fig:EV"}]({EV_comparison}.jpg){width="\linewidth"}

The role of mantle dynamics in dictating magnetic field strength also indirectly links the core to climate. Climate influences the tectonic regime of a planet, and the tectonic regime dictates the core cooling rate through time and thus whether a long-lived magnetic field can be maintained. Therefore a cool climate, being favorable for plate tectonics, will also be favorable for long-term magnetic field generation, and hot climates, to the extent that they lead to stagnant lid convection, will be unfavorable for the dynamo. An important question is then whether the core can exert any influence on climate through the role the magnetic field plays in limiting atmospheric escape. We address this topic next.

Magnetic limited escape {#sec:mag_limited_escape}
-----------------------

In describing the escape of a planetary atmosphere it is helpful to think of the limiting escape mechanism rather than the specific physical escape process, as several escape processes typically occur concurrently with a single limiting bottleneck. The escape limit is typically characterized as being in either the diffusion or energy limited regime, with no connection to the presence of a magnetic field. However, it is commonly argued that magnetic field strength should play an important role in atmospheric escape [@michel1971; @chassefiere1997; @lundin2007; @dehant2007; @lammer2012; @owen2014; @brain2014]. Below we speculate about how
of the dynamo beyond this thermal adjustment period. 

 In addition to normal convective cooling, volcanic heating system personnel casualty can potentially extend core cooling beyond the thermal adaptation period on a stagnant hat satellite, provided most of the melt can reach the surface of the planet and cool [ @morgan1983; @nakagawa2012; @armann2012; @Driscoll2014 ]. Obviously, magmatic heating system loss was not efficient enough for Venus, Mars, or the Moon to hold dynamos, so we are leave with the tentative conclusion that a dead lid reduces both the long - terminus convective and volcanic mantle heat loss. 

! [ Comparison of the predict thermal (A) and charismatic (B) histories of Earth (firm) and Venus (dashed). The only difference between the model is the Earth model uses a mobile lid heat menstruation scaling while the Venus model uses a stagnant lid scaling (see (\[q\_cmb\])-(\[q\_conv\ ]); @Driscoll2014 contains additional details).[]{data - label="fig: EV"}]({EV_comparison}.jpg){width="\linewidth " } 

 The role of mantle dynamics in order magnetic field lastingness also indirectly links the core to climate. Climate influences the tectonic government of a planet, and the tectonic regime dictates the core cool rate through time and thus whether a long - lived magnetic field can be sustain. Therefore a cool climate, being favorable for plate tectonics, will also be favorable for retentive - term magnetic field generation, and hot climate, to the extent that they lead to stagnant lid convection, will be unfavorable for the dynamo. An authoritative question is then whether the core can exert any influence on climate through the role the charismatic field plays in limiting atmospheric escape. We address this subject next. 

 Magnetic limited escape { # sec: mag_limited_escape } 
 ----------------------- 

 In describing the evasion of a planetary air it is helpful to think of the limiting escape mechanism rather than the specific physical safety valve process, as several escape processes typically occur concurrently with a single limiting bottleneck. The escape terminus ad quem is typically characterized as being in either the diffusion or department of energy limited regime, with no connection to the bearing of a magnetic field. However, it is commonly argued that magnetic field strength should play an important role in atmospheric escape [ @michel1971; @chassefiere1997; @lundin2007; @dehant2007; @lammer2012; @owen2014; @brain2014 ]. downstairs we chew over about how
 of the dynamo beyond this uhermal adjustmenj period.

Mn addifion to vormal convective cooling, vopcqnic yeat loss can potentiauly extenf core cioliig beyond the thxdmal admbstmehb pernov on a stagnant lid planed, provided mosd uf the melt can reach the surface of ehe plameh and cool [@mordan1983; @mwkagzwa2012; @armann2012; @Driscoll2014]. Obviously, magmztic heet loss was not efficient enough for Venud, Mags, or the Moon to dustain dynqmos, wo we are lewt with tht centative cknclusion that a stagnant lid rdducex both the ling-hgrm convectite and volcanic maknle head loss.

![Cpmparison of tme prxdicred thermal (A) and magietic (B) histories of Earth (sonib) and Venus (dashed). Thw inly giffarenzw bdtwten tge modfls is the Eadth model uwes a mobile lid hest dlow scaling shile ehq Venus model uses a stagnant lid scalitg (aee (\[q\_cmb\])-(\[q\_conv\]); @Driscoll2014 xontains additional dgtails).[]{data-jabel="fig:EV"}]({EV_comparison}.jpg){width="\linewidth"}

The role ox manvld dvkwoucd in dictating magnetic field strength also igsitebtly links the cove to climate. Climstf ogfluences the tectoujc regime of a planeh, and tre textonic redime dictates the core cooling eate through rime and thus whetker a long-lired mabnetiv field can be maintainzd. Thedefore a coll climats, being favorable fog pldte tectonics, will also be favorablx for long-tefm msgnetis field gejeratlmn, and hot climated, to jhe exdent that hhey lead to stagnant lid convervion, will be onfdvogable for the cynamo. An impjrtant questiou is theu whetfer the coge can exxrt any infltence on climdje through thx role thq matnetuc fiela plays in limiying atmospheric esxape. We address thls tokid next.

Magnetic oimuted escape {#sec:kag_uimytvd_excw[e}
-----------------------

In describhng ghe rscapd of a kjaketxry stmosphere it is hel[ful to think of the lomlting escqpe mechwnism rather yhan the specific khysicel escepe prpcefs, as several escape processes typicallj ogcur concurregtly with a singke limiting bottleneck. The escape limit is typically chatacterized as being iu tither the dihfusiog or enercy limited regime, wirh no connection uo the presence of a mafnetic fielf. However, it is commonly argued that magnetic field strength should play qn important role jn aymospvexic escapq [@mirhxl1971; @chassefiere1997; @lumdin2007; @dehant2007; @lammer2012; @owen2014; @brain2014]. Bxlow we spacblate about how
of the dynamo beyond this thermal adjustment addition normal convective volcanic heat loss beyond thermal adjustment period a stagnant lid provided most of the melt can the surface of the planet and cool [@morgan1983; @nakagawa2012; @armann2012; @Driscoll2014]. Obviously, magmatic loss was not efficient enough for Venus, Mars, or the Moon to sustain so are with tentative conclusion that a stagnant lid reduces both the long-term convective and volcanic mantle heat loss. of the predicted thermal (A) and magnetic (B) of Earth (solid) and (dashed). The only difference between models the Earth uses mobile heat flow scaling the Venus model uses a stagnant lid scaling (see (\[q\_cmb\])-(\[q\_conv\]); @Driscoll2014 contains additional details).[]{data-label="fig:EV"}]({EV_comparison}.jpg){width="\linewidth"} The role of dynamics in field strength indirectly the to climate. Climate tectonic regime of a planet, and dictates the core cooling rate through time and whether a magnetic field can be maintained. Therefore cool climate, being favorable for plate tectonics, will be favorable for long-term magnetic field generation, and hot climates, to the extent that they stagnant lid convection, will unfavorable for the An question then the core exert any influence on climate through the role the magnetic field in limiting atmospheric escape. We address this topic next. Magnetic {#sec:mag_limited_escape} In describing the of a planetary atmosphere is to think of the mechanism than escape as escape processes typically occur with a single limiting bottleneck. escape limit is typically the diffusion or energy limited regime, with no to the presence of a magnetic field. it is commonly argued that magnetic field strength should play an important in atmospheric @chassefiere1997; @lundin2007; @dehant2007; @lammer2012; @owen2014; @brain2014]. Below we about how
 of the dynamo beyond this therMal adjustmEnt peRioD.

In AdDitiOn to Normal convectiVE cooLing, volcanic heat loss caN poteNtIAlly EXtEnd coRe cooliNG bEYOnd ThE tHerMaL AdJustmEnt Period oN a stagnant Lid PlAnet, provided MOsT of the melt Can Reach the surfAce Of the pLaNet ANd cooL [@moRgan1983; @nAkagawA2012; @Armann2012; @driscoll2014]. OBvIOusly, mAGmatic hEAT lOss wAs not efficient enoUGh FOr Venus, Mars, or tHe Moon To SUsTAIn dYnaMos, so we are LeFt witH The tentATiVE COncLUsion that a staGnant lid redUCes Both thE lOng-TErm conVectiVe ANd vOlcanic mantLe heAt loss.

![ComParisoN Of the prEDicted tHermal (a) anD maGnetIC (B) HiStoRiES of eArTh (sOLid) And Venus (DaShEd). The Only DIFFErenCe bEtweEn the Models is the EaRth ModeL UseS a mobIle liD heaT fLow scAling wHile tHe venus model uses a StagNant lid scAliNg (See (\[Q\_cMb\])-(\[q\_coNV\]); @DriscOll2014 ConTains adDitionaL DetAiLS).[]{DAtA-label="fig:EV"}]({EV_compaRiSON}.jPg){width="\lInewidTH"}

THe ROle of manTlE dyNamiCS In dicTatiNG mAgnetic fIeld stREnGtH also inDiRectly LiNks The Core tO ClimAte. CliMate inflUenceS The tectonic regIMe of a planet, anD ThE TEcTOnic RegIme dictates The cORe coOlinG RaTe tHRough Time aNd THuS Whether a long-lived maGnEtic fiEld caN be maintained. therefore a COOL climate, BeinG FaVOrable for plate TectoNics, will alSO be favorAble fOr long-teRm magnetiC FIeld geneRatIon, And Hot CLImAtes, to the exteNT That ThEy lead tO stAgnant lId cOnvEctIon, WiLl be unfavOrable foR tHe DyNaMo. AN impoRTant quesTiOn iS tHen WhethER the coRe can ExerT aNy INflUence on CLiMATe thRoUgH the RolE tHe magNetiC FieLd plays In limitinG atMOsphErIc Escape. WE address this tOpIc next.

MagnEtIc lImited ESCape {#sec:mAg_limited_escape}
-----------------------

In descriBIng the eScaPe of a PlanEtary atmoSphEre it iS heLPful to Think oF the lImItiNG EscapE MEcHanIsM rather thaN THe sPecifIc PhysIcal escApe process, as severaL EscApe processes tYpiCallY OCcUr cONcURreNtLY wiTH A single limiting Bottleneck. thE EsCape limit iS TypIcAlly chaRacteriZed as BEing in eIther the dIffusion oR eNergY LImiTed regime, wIth no conNection to THe preSEnCe of a MagNetic fIeLd. HOweveR, it is cOMmoNly arGued thAt MagnetIc fieLd Strength Should play an important roLe in atMosphEriC escape [@miCheL1971; @ChaSsefiere1997; @lUndiN2007; @dehant2007; @lamMer2012; @OweN2014; @braiN2014]. BeLOw we sPecuLAtE abOUt how
 of the dynamo beyond this  thermal a djust men t p er iod. 

In  addition to n o rmal  convective cooling, v olcan ic heat lo ss ca n poten t ia l l y e xt en d c or e  c oolin g b eyond t he thermal  ad ju stment perio d  o n a stagna ntlid planet,pro videdmo sto f the  me lt ca n reac h  the s urface of  t h e plan e t and c o o l[@mo rgan1983; @nakaga w a2 0 12; @armann201 2; @Dr is c ol l 2 014 ].Obviously,  m agmat i c heatl os s w asn ot efficientenough forV enu s, Mar s,  or the Mo on to  s u sta in dynamos,  sowe are le ft wit h  the te n tativeconclu sio n t hata  s ta gna nt lid re duc e s b oth thelo ng -term  con v e c t iveand  vol canic  mantle heatlos s.
! [Co mpari son o f th epredi cted t herma l(A) and magneti c (B ) histori esof  Ea rt h (so l id) an d V enu s (dash ed). Th e  on ly d i ff erence between the  m o d el s is the  Earth mo de l  uses amo bil e li d heatflow sc aling wh ile th e  V en us mode luses a  s tag nan t lid scal ing (s ee (\[q\ _cmb\ ] )-(\[q\_conv\] ) ; @Driscoll20 1 4c o nt a insadd itional det ails ) .[]{ data - la bel = "fig: EV"}] ({ E V_ c omparison}.jpg){wid th ="\lin ewidt h"}

The role  of mantle d y namics i n di c ta t ing magnetic f ieldstrength a l so indir ectly  links t he core t o climate.  Cl ima teinf l u en ces the tecto n i c re gi me of a  pl anet, a ndthe  te cto ni c regimedictates  t he  c or e c oolin g  rate th ro ugh  t ime  andt hus wh ether  a l on g- l ive d magne t ic f ield  c an  bemai nt ained . Th e ref ore a c ool clima te, bein gfa vorable  for plate te ct onics, wil lals o be f a v orable f or long-term magnetic f i eld gen era tion,  and  hot clim ate s, tothe extent  thattheyle adt o  stag n a nt  li dconvection , wil l beun favo rable f or the dynamo. Ani mpo rtant questio n i s th e n  w het h er the  c o rec a n exert any inf luence oncl i ma te through the  r ole the  magnet ic fi e ld play s in limi ting atmo sp heri c esc ape. We ad dress th is topicn ext.Ma gneti c l imited  e sca pe {# sec:ma g _li mited _escap e} 
----- ----- -- -------- ---

In describing theescape  of a  pl anetary a tmo s phe re it ishelp ful to thi nkofthe l imi t ing e scap e  m ech a nismrath e r than th e  s pec i f ic  physical e s c a peproce ss, as sev eral  escape processes typically occu r co n c urr ent l y wi th  a single limi tin gb o ttleneck .The escapelimit is  t y pical ly cha racter ized as b ei n g in e ithe r t he diffus ion  o r  energy  l im i ted re gime ,with n o conn e ctio n to the presenceof am a gneti c  fi eld.Ho wever,i t is  commonlyargued that  magne ticfield  streng th  shoul d p la y an impor t ant rolein at mospher ic  esc ape  [@mic hel1 9 7 1; @c hass ef ier e1997; @l u n di n 20 07 ;  @d ehan t2007 ;@lam mer2012;@ owen2014 ; @ b rain201 4] . B e l ow wes pe c u late about  ho w
 of_the dynamo_beyond this thermal adjustment_period.

In addition_to_normal convective_cooling,_volcanic heat loss_can potentially extend_core cooling beyond the_thermal adjustment period_on_a stagnant lid planet, provided most of the melt can reach the surface of_the_planet and_cool_[@morgan1983;_@nakagawa2012; @armann2012; @Driscoll2014]. Obviously, magmatic_heat loss was not efficient_enough for_Venus, Mars, or the Moon to sustain dynamos,_so_we are left_with the tentative conclusion that a stagnant lid reduces_both the long-term convective and volcanic_mantle heat loss.

![Comparison_of_the_predicted thermal (A) and_magnetic (B) histories of Earth (solid)_and Venus (dashed). The only difference_between the models is the Earth model_uses a mobile lid heat flow_scaling while the Venus model_uses a_stagnant lid scaling (see (\[q\_cmb\])-(\[q\_conv\]);_@Driscoll2014 contains additional_details).[]{data-label="fig:EV"}]({EV_comparison}.jpg){width="\linewidth"}

The role_of mantle dynamics_in dictating magnetic field strength also_indirectly links the_core to climate. Climate influences the_tectonic_regime of a_planet,_and_the tectonic_regime dictates the_core_cooling rate_through_time and thus whether a long-lived_magnetic_field can be maintained. Therefore a cool_climate, being favorable for_plate_tectonics, will also be_favorable for long-term magnetic field_generation, and hot climates, to the_extent that_they lead_to stagnant lid convection, will be unfavorable for the dynamo. An_important question is then whether the_core can exert any_influence on_climate_through the role_the_magnetic field_plays in limiting atmospheric escape. We address_this topic_next.

Magnetic limited escape {#sec:mag_limited_escape}
-----------------------

In describing the_escape of a planetary_atmosphere_it is helpful to think of_the limiting escape mechanism rather than_the specific physical escape process,_as_several_escape processes typically occur concurrently_with a single limiting bottleneck. The_escape limit is_typically characterized as being in either the_diffusion_or energy limited regime, with no_connection_to the presence of a magnetic_field._However,_it is commonly argued that_magnetic field strength should play an_important role in atmospheric escape [@michel1971; @chassefiere1997; @lundin2007; @dehant2007;_@lammer2012; @owen2014; @brain2014]._Below we speculate about how