 Then Rmk. \[17471910B\] allows us to construct ${\mathfrak{W}}$ satisfying the condition $(5)$ in Def. \[10282712\]. About the problem of satisfying $FM(3)-FM(4)$ recall the very important Rmk. \[21132406\].

The following characterization of ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{U}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$ will be very important in the sequel.

\[15482712\] Let ${\left\langle {\mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{W}},X,Y{\right\rangle}}$ be a $\left(\Theta,{\mathcal{E}}\right)-$structure, $x_{\infty}\in W\subseteq X$ and ${\mathcal{U}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{b}{\mathfrak{M}}_{x}$. By using the notations in Definition \[10282712\] we have $
(1)
\Leftarrow
(2)
\Leftarrow
(3)
\Leftrightarrow
(4)
$ moreover if ${\mathfrak{W}}$ is locally full $(1)
\Leftrightarrow
(2)
\Leftrightarrow
(3)
\Leftrightarrow
(4)
$, finally if ${\mathfrak{W}}$ is full we can choose $U=X$ in $(2)$ and $U'=X$ in $(3)$ and $(4)$. Here

1.  ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{W}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$;

2.  $
    (\exists\,U\in Op(X)\mid U\ni x_{\infty})
    (\exists\,F\in\Gamma_{U}(\rho))
    (F(x_{\infty})
    ={\mathcal{U}}(x_{\infty}))
    $ such that $
    (\forall j\in J)
    (\forall K\in Compact(Y))
    (\forall B\in\Theta)
    $ $$\label{02022912}
    \boxed{
    \lim_{z\to x_{\infty},z\in W\cap U}
    \sup_{t\in K}
    \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\mathcal{E}})}
    \nu_{j}\left({\mathcal{U}}(z)(t)v(z)-F(z)(t)v(z)
    \
Then Rmk. \[17471910B\ ] allows us to construct $ { \mathfrak{W}}$ satisfying the condition $ (5)$ in Def. \[10282712\ ]. About the trouble of meet $ FM(3)-FM(4)$ recall the very important Rmk. \[21132406\ ]. 

 The following word picture of $ { \mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{U}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$ will be very crucial in the sequel. 

 \[15482712\ ] Let $ { \left\langle { \mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{W}},X, Y{\right\rangle}}$ be a $ \left(\Theta,{\mathcal{E}}\right)-$structure, $ x_{\infty}\in W\subseteq X$ and $ { \mathcal{U}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{b}{\mathfrak{M}}_{x}$. By using the notation in Definition \[10282712\ ] we have $ 
 (1) 
 \Leftarrow 
 (2) 
 \Leftarrow 
 (3) 
 \Leftrightarrow 
 (4) 
 $ moreover if $ { \mathfrak{W}}$ is locally entire $ (1) 
 \Leftrightarrow 
 (2) 
 \Leftrightarrow 
 (3) 
 \Leftrightarrow 
 (4) 
 $, finally if $ { \mathfrak{W}}$ is full we can choose $ uranium = X$ in $ (2)$ and $ U'=X$ in $ (3)$ and $ (4)$. Here 

 1.   $ { \mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{W}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$; 

 2.   $ 
     (\exists\,U\in Op(X)\mid U\ni x_{\infty }) 
     (\exists\,F\in\Gamma_{U}(\rho) ) 
     (F(x_{\infty }) 
     = { \mathcal{U}}(x_{\infty }) ) 
     $ such that $ 
     (\forall j\in J) 
     (\forall K\in Compact(Y) ) 
     (\forall B\in\Theta) 
     $ $ $ \label{02022912 } 
     \boxed { 
     \lim_{z\to x_{\infty},z\in W\cap U } 
     \sup_{t\in K } 
     \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\mathcal{E } }) } 
     \nu_{j}\left({\mathcal{U}}(z)(t)v(z)-F(z)(t)v(z) 
     \
 Thfn Rmk. \[17471910B\] allows us to cokstruct ${\mathfrak{C}}$ satishying tge condigion $(5)$ in Def. \[10282712\]. About the probpen of watisfying $FM(3)-FM(4)$ recall the very importabt Rnj. \[21132406\].

The following charactedlzatimi of ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Namma_{U}^{x_{\inftf}}(\rho)$ will be varh nmportant in the sequel.

\[15482712\] Let ${\left\langje {\mathgrwk{V}},{\mathfrak{W}},X,Y{\tight\gaggle}}$ be a $\left(\Theta,{\mathcal{E}}\right)-$structhre, $x_{\inhty}\in W\subseteq X$ and ${\mathcal{U}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{h}{\matjfrak{M}}_{x}$. By using tje notationw in Eefinition \[10282712\] de have $
(1)
\Leftarrow
(2)
\Leftatrow
(3)
\Leftrightarrow
(4)
$ moreover if ${\mxthfrck{W}}$ is locaolt fknl $(1)
\Leftrighvarrow
(2)
\Jeftrightarrow
(3)
\Leftrichtarroe
(4)
$, finally if ${\msthhrak{Q}}$ is full we can choove $U=X$ in $(2)$ and $U'=X$ ig $(3)$ and $(4)$. Harz

1.  ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{W}^{x_{\ibfry}}(\rho)$;

2.  $
    (\exkwts\,J\in O'(X)\mjd U\ni x_{\iifty})
    (\exiats\,F\in\Gamma_{Y}(\rho))
    (F(x_{\infty})
    ={\kaeycal{U}}(x_{\infty}))
    $ sucr ehat $
    (\forall j\in J)
    (\forall K\in Comkact(Y))
    (\forall B\in\Theta)
    $ $$\label{02022912}
    \boxed{
    \lil_{z\to x_{\infey},z\in W\cap U}
    \sup_{t\in K}
    \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\mathcal{A}})}
    \iu_{g}\leyb({\ixrhfal{U}}(z)(t)v(z)-F(z)(t)v(z)
    \
Then Rmk. \[17471910B\] allows us to construct the $(5)$ in \[10282712\]. About the the important Rmk. \[21132406\]. following characterization of will be very important in the \[15482712\] Let ${\left\langle {\mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{W}},X,Y{\right\rangle}}$ be a $\left(\Theta,{\mathcal{E}}\right)-$structure, $x_{\infty}\in W\subseteq X$ and ${\mathcal{U}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{b}{\mathfrak{M}}_{x}$. using the notations in Definition \[10282712\] we have $ (1) \Leftarrow (2) \Leftarrow \Leftrightarrow $ if is locally full $(1) \Leftrightarrow (2) \Leftrightarrow (3) \Leftrightarrow (4) $, finally if ${\mathfrak{W}}$ is full can choose $U=X$ in $(2)$ and $U'=X$ in and $(4)$. Here 1. 2. $ (\exists\,U\in Op(X)\mid U\ni (\exists\,F\in\Gamma_{U}(\rho)) ={\mathcal{U}}(x_{\infty})) $ that (\forall J) (\forall K\in (\forall B\in\Theta) $ $$\label{02022912} \boxed{ \lim_{z\to x_{\infty},z\in W\cap U} \sup_{t\in K} \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\mathcal{E}})} \nu_{j}\left({\mathcal{U}}(z)(t)v(z)-F(z)(t)v(z) \
 Then Rmk. \[17471910B\] allows us to construCt ${\mathfrak{w}}$ satiSfyIng ThE conDitiOn $(5)$ in Def. \[10282712\]. About thE ProbLem of satisfying $FM(3)-FM(4)$ recAll thE vERy imPOrTant RMk. \[21132406\].

The foLLoWINg cHaRaCteRiZAtIon of ${\MatHcal{U}}\in\gamma_{U}^{x_{\infTy}}(\rHo)$ Will be very imPOrTant in the sEquEl.

\[15482712\] Let ${\left\lanGle {\MathfrAk{v}},{\maTHfrak{w}},X,Y{\Right\Rangle}}$ BE a $\left(\theta,{\mathCaL{e}}\right)-$STructurE, $X_{\InFty}\iN W\subseteq X$ and ${\matHCaL{u}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{b}{\maThfrak{m}}_{x}$. bY uSINg tHe nOtations in deFinitIOn \[10282712\] we havE $
(1)
\leFTARroW
(2)
\leftarrow
(3)
\LeftRightarrow
(4)
$ mOReoVer if ${\mAtHfrAK{W}}$ is loCally FuLL $(1)
\LeFtrightarroW
(2)
\LefTrightarrOw
(3)
\LeftRIghtarrOW
(4)
$, finallY if ${\matHfrAk{W}}$ Is fuLL wE cAn cHoOSe $U=x$ In $(2)$ And $u'=x$ in $(3)$ And $(4)$. Here

1.  ${\mAtHcAl{U}}\in\gammA_{w}^{X_{\INfty}}(\Rho)$;

2.  $
    (\ExisTs\,U\in op(X)\mid U\ni x_{\infTy})
    (\eXistS\,f\in\gamma_{u}(\rho))
    (F(X_{\infTy})
    ={\MathcAl{U}}(x_{\inFty}))
    $ suCh That $
    (\forall j\in J)
    (\fOralL K\in CompaCt(Y))
    (\FoRalL B\In\TheTA)
    $ $$\label{02022912}
    \BoxEd{
    \lIm_{z\to x_{\iNfty},z\in w\Cap u}
    \sUP_{T\In k}
    \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\matHcAL{e}})}
    \nU_{j}\left({\maThcal{U}}(Z)(T)v(Z)-F(Z)(T)v(z)
    \
 Then Rmk. \[17471910B\] a llows us t o con str uct  $ {\ma thfr ak{W}}$ satisf y ingthe condition $(5)$ in  Def.  \ [ 1028 2 71 2\].About t h ep r obl em  o f s at i sf ying$FM (3)-FM( 4)$ recall  th every importa n tRmk. \[211 324 06\].

The f oll owingch ara c teriz ati on of  ${\ma t hcal{U }}\in\Gam ma _ {U}^{x _ {\infty } } (\ rho) $ will be very im p or t ant in the seq uel.
\[ 1 54 8 2 712 \]Let ${\lef t\ langl e  {\math f ra k { V }}, { \mathfrak{W}} ,X,Y{\right \ ran gle}}$  b e a $\left (\The ta , {\m athcal{E}}\ righ t)-$struc ture,$ x_{\inf t y}\in W \subse teq  X$  and ${ \m ath ca l {U} } \i n\p r od_ {x\in W} ^{ b} {\mat hfra k { M } }_{x }$.  Byusing  the notation s i n De f ini tion\[102 8271 2\ ] wehave $ 
(1)\L eftarrow
(2)
\L efta rrow
(3)\Le ft rig ht arrow (4)
$mor eov er if $ {\mathf r ak{ W} } $ is  locally full $(1) 
\ L e ft rightarr ow
(2) \L ef t rightarr ow 
(3 )
\L e f trigh tarr o w(4)
$, f inally if  $ {\mathf ra k{W}}$  i s f ull  we c a n ch oose $ U=X$ in$(2)$ and $U'=X$ in$ (3)$ and $(4) $ .H e re 
1. ${ \mathcal{U} }\in \ Gamm a_{W } ^{ x_{ \ infty }}(\r ho ) $; 
2.  $
    (\exists \, U\in O p(X)\ mid U\ni x_{\ infty})
 ( \exists\ ,F\i n \G a mma_{U}(\rho)) 
   (F(x_{\inf t y})
   ={\ma thcal{U} }(x_{\inf t y }))
   $ s uch  th at$    (\forall j\ i n  J)   (\for all  K\in C omp act (Y) )
  (\forall  B\in\Th et a) 
  $$$\la b el{02022 91 2}   \ boxed { 
    \ lim_{ z\to  x _{ \ inf ty},z\i n  W \ c ap U }   \s up_ {t \in K }
  \s up_{v\i n{\mathbf {D} } (B,{ \m at hcal{E} })}
    \nu_{ j} \left({\ma th cal {U}}(z ) ( t)v(z)-F (z)(t)v(z)
    \
 Then_Rmk. \[17471910B\]_allows us to construct_${\mathfrak{W}}$ satisfying_the_condition $(5)$_in_Def. \[10282712\]. About_the problem of_satisfying $FM(3)-FM(4)$ recall the_very important Rmk._\[21132406\].

The_following characterization of ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{U}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$ will be very important in the sequel.

\[15482712\] Let ${\left\langle {\mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{W}},X,Y{\right\rangle}}$_be_a $\left(\Theta,{\mathcal{E}}\right)-$structure,_$x_{\infty}\in_W\subseteq_X$ and ${\mathcal{U}}\in\prod_{x\in W}^{b}{\mathfrak{M}}_{x}$. By_using the notations in Definition_\[10282712\] we_have $
(1)
\Leftarrow
(2)
\Leftarrow
(3)
\Leftrightarrow
(4)
$ moreover if ${\mathfrak{W}}$ is locally full_$(1)
\Leftrightarrow
(2)
\Leftrightarrow
(3)
\Leftrightarrow
(4)
$,_finally if ${\mathfrak{W}}$_is full we can choose $U=X$ in $(2)$ and_$U'=X$ in $(3)$ and $(4)$. Here

1._ ${\mathcal{U}}\in\Gamma_{W}^{x_{\infty}}(\rho)$;

2. _$
__  (\exists\,U\in Op(X)\mid_U\ni x_{\infty})
    (\exists\,F\in\Gamma_{U}(\rho))
_   (F(x_{\infty})
  _ ={\mathcal{U}}(x_{\infty}))
    $ such_that $
    (\forall_j\in J)
   _(\forall K\in_Compact(Y))
    (\forall_B\in\Theta)
  _ $_$$\label{02022912}
  _ \boxed{
    \lim_{z\to_x_{\infty},z\in W\cap U}
_   \sup_{t\in K}
 __ \sup_{v\in{\mathbf{D}}(B,{\mathcal{E}})}
 ___\nu_{j}\left({\mathcal{U}}(z)(t)v(z)-F(z)(t)v(z)
 _  \