delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}/a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}
\simeq 0.005\%$. We find empirically that the simulations’ pattern speeds are also uncertain by this fraction, so $\delta\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2\simeq0.02$ deg/day, which is the vertical extent of the gray band around the simulated data in Fig. \[m2\_fig\].

Rather, this discrepancy is indirectly due to the absence of the $J_4$ and higher terms from the N-body simulations. To demonstrate this, repeat the $\sigma_0=200$ gm/cm$^2$ simulation with $J_2$ boosted slightly by factor $f^\star=1.0395013$ so that the second zonal harmonic is $J_2^\star=f^\star J_2=0.016934294$. This increases the simulated B ring-edge’s angular velocity slightly to $\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}=758.8824$ deg/day, which is in fact the ring’s true angular velocity at $a=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ when the higher order $J_4$ and $J_6$ terms are also accounted for[^3]. And since Saturn’s gravitational force there is $a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}^2$, this means that Saturn’s gravity on the simulated particles at $r=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ is in fact the true value. Note that boosting $J_2$ to the slightly larger value $J_2^\star$ also requires bringing the simulated Mimas inwards and just interior to its true semimajor axis by 2km. Which speeds up both the forced and free pattern speeds, and is why this simulation’s free $m=2$ pattern speed $\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2$, which is the cross in Fig. \[m2\_fig\], is in better agreement with the observed pattern speed. So the discrepancy between all the other simulated and observed pattern speeds $\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2$ is due to those models’ not accounting for the additional gravity that is due to the $J_4$ and higher terms in Saturn’s oblate figure. Compensating for the absence of those oblateness effects requires altering the simulated satellite’s orbits slightly, which in turn alters the forced and free pattern speeds
delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}/a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge } } 
 \simeq 0.005\%$. We find empirically that the simulations ’ pattern speed are besides uncertain by this fraction, so $ \delta\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2\simeq0.02 $ deg / sidereal day, which is the vertical extent of the grey band around the simulated datum in Fig.   \[m2\_fig\ ]. 

 quite, this discrepancy is indirectly due to the absence of the $ J_4 $ and high terms from the N - body pretense. To demonstrate this, repeat the $ \sigma_0=200 $ gram / cm$^2 $ simulation with $ J_2 $ boosted slightly by factor $ f^\star=1.0395013 $ so that the second zonal harmonic is $ J_2^\star = f^\star J_2=0.016934294$. This increases the simulated B ring - boundary ’s angular velocity slightly to $ \Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}=758.8824 $ deg / day, which is in fact the closed chain ’s true angular velocity at $ a = a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ when the high order $ J_4 $ and $ J_6 $ footing are also accounted for[^3 ]. And since Saturn ’s gravitational force there is $ a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}^2 $, this means that Saturn ’s graveness on the simulated particles at $ r = a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ is in fact the true value. Note that boosting $ J_2 $ to the slenderly bigger value $ J_2^\star$ also requires bringing the simulated Mimas inwards and just interior to its true semimajor axis by 2 km. Which rush up both the forced and free radiation pattern speeds, and is why this simulation ’s free $ m=2 $ pattern focal ratio $ \dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2 $, which is the cross in Fig.   \[m2\_fig\ ], is in better agreement with the observed pattern focal ratio. So the discrepancy between all the other simulated and observed pattern speeds $ \dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2 $ is ascribable to those models ’ not accounting for the additional gravity that is due to the $ J_4 $ and higher terms in Saturn ’s oblate trope. Compensating for the absence of those oblateness effects requires altering the simulated satellite ’s eye socket slightly, which in turn alters the forced and free pattern speeds
delha\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\sgriptsize edge}}/a_{\myix{\scri'tsize sdge}}
\simed 0.005\%$. We find empirically that vhe wimulqtions’ pattern speeds xre also lncertain by uhis fraction, so $\vslta\dot{\bnlde{\ojcga}}_2\sikxq0.02$ deg/day, which is the vestical extent mf tke gray band around the simulated daea in Fog. \[l2\_fig\].

Rather, thif dixsrepzncy is indirectly due to the absehce of uhe $J_4$ and higher trrms from the N-body simulahiond. To demonstrate tjis, repeat jge $\fugma_0=200$ gm/cm$^2$ sioulation wpch $J_2$ boostes slightly by factor $f^\star=1.0395013$ so tfat tke second zinql jdrmonic is $O_2^\star=f^\ftar J_2=0.016934294$. This lmcreasas the ximulated B rikg-edgx’s abgular velocity slighvly to $\Omega_{\mbox{\scriktsize edga}}=758.8824$ beg/day, which is in faxt the ting’s trud aneulzr vslocitj av $a=a_{\mbox{\scrjptsize edgw}}$ when the higher otdqg $J_4$ and $J_6$ terjs are ajso accounted for[^3]. And since Saturn’s granitafional force there is $a_{\nbox{\scriptsize edge}}\Omgga_{\mbox{\scryptsize edge}}^2$, this means that Saturn’s gravity on tve sijjlauee pargucpes at $r=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ is in fact the twhe vslue. Note that boosting $J_2$ tl yre slightly lxrger rzlhe $J_2^\star$ also requlres bryngint the simtlatrd Mimas inwards and just ibterior to ins teue semimajor axis by 2km. Whick speecs up both the forced and frze patfern speeds, and is wgh this simulatiov’s nrea $m=2$ patttfn speed $\dot{\tilde{\jmega}}_2$, whirh is the cruss on Fig. \[i2\_fig\], is in bettcs agreement with tje obdesved pattegn speed. So the discrepancy betxxen all the ojhes spmulated cnd obxerved patterg speeds $\dot{\tikde{\omegc}}_2$ is dje to thosv models’ iot accountigg for the adgltional gravmty that ys dye ti the $J_4$ xnd higher terks in Satlru’s oblate figure. Compensatikg fot fhe absence of ckowe oblateness egfezts rvqumres wntering the vimuuatdc satdllite’s orblts slibhtly, which in turn dlteds the forced and grce patterb speeds
delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}/a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}} \simeq 0.005\%$. We that simulations’ pattern are also uncertain deg/day, is the vertical of the gray around the simulated data in Fig. Rather, this discrepancy is indirectly due to the absence of the $J_4$ and terms from the N-body simulations. To demonstrate this, repeat the $\sigma_0=200$ gm/cm$^2$ simulation $J_2$ slightly factor so that the second zonal harmonic is $J_2^\star=f^\star J_2=0.016934294$. This increases the simulated B ring-edge’s angular slightly to $\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}=758.8824$ deg/day, which is in the ring’s true angular at $a=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ when the order and $J_6$ are accounted And since Saturn’s force there is $a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}^2$, this means that Saturn’s gravity on the simulated particles at $r=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize is in true value. that $J_2$ the slightly larger also requires bringing the simulated Mimas interior to its true semimajor axis by 2km. speeds up the forced and free pattern speeds, is why this simulation’s free $m=2$ pattern speed which is the cross in Fig. \[m2\_fig\], is in better agreement with the observed pattern the discrepancy between all other simulated and pattern $\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2$ due those models’ accounting for the additional gravity that is due to the $J_4$ higher terms in Saturn’s oblate figure. Compensating for the absence oblateness requires altering the satellite’s orbits slightly, which turn the forced and free
delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\Scriptsize Edge}}/a_{\MboX{\scRiPtsiZe edGe}}
\simeq 0.005\%$. We find eMPiriCally that the simulationS’ pattErN SpeeDS aRe alsO uncertAIn BY ThiS fRaCtiOn, SO $\dElta\dOt{\tIlde{\omeGa}}_2\simeq0.02$ deg/Day, WhIch is the vertICaL extent of tHe gRay band arounD thE simulAtEd dATa in FIg. \[m2\_Fig\].

RaTher, thIS discrEpancy is iNdIRectly DUe to the ABSeNce oF the $J_4$ and higher terMS fROm the N-body simuLationS. TO DeMONstRatE this, repeaT tHe $\sigMA_0=200$ gm/cm$^2$ siMUlATIOn wITh $J_2$ boosted sliGhtly by factOR $f^\sTar=1.0395013$ so tHaT thE Second Zonal HaRMonIc is $J_2^\star=f^\sTar J_2=0.016934294$. this increAses thE SimulatED B ring-eDge’s anGulAr vElocITy SlIghTlY To $\OMEgA_{\mbOX{\scRiptsize EdGe}}=758.8824$ Deg/daY, whiCH IS In faCt tHe riNg’s trUe angular veloCitY at $a=A_{\MboX{\scriPtsizE edgE}}$ wHen thE higheR ordeR $J_4$ And $J_6$ terms are alsO accOunted for[^3]. and SiNce saTurn’s GRavitaTioNal Force thEre is $a_{\mBOx{\sCrIPTSiZe edge}}\Omega_{\mbox{\scrIpTSIzE edge}}^2$, thiS means THaT SATurn’s graViTy oN the SIMulatEd paRTiCles at $r=a_{\Mbox{\scRIpTsIze edge}}$ Is In fact ThE trUe vAlue. NOTe thAt boosTing $J_2$ to tHe sliGHtly larger valuE $j_2^\star$ also requIReS BRiNGing The Simulated MiMas iNWardS and JUsT inTErior To its TrUE sEMimajor axis by 2km. WhicH sPeeds uP both The forced and fRee pattern SPEEds, and is Why tHIs SImulation’s free $M=2$ pattErn speed $\doT{\Tilde{\omeGa}}_2$, whiCh is the cRoss in Fig. \[M2\_FIg\], is in beTteR agReeMenT WItH the observed pATTern SpEed. So thE diScrepanCy bEtwEen All ThE other simUlated anD oBsErVeD paTtern SPeeds $\dot{\TiLde{\OmEga}}_2$ Is due TO those ModelS’ not AcCoUNtiNg for thE AdDITionAl GrAvitY thAt Is due To thE $j_4$ anD higher Terms in SaTurN’S oblAtE fIgure. CoMpensating for ThE absence of ThOse OblateNESs effectS requires altering the simULated saTelLite’s OrbiTs slightlY, whIch in tUrn ALters tHe forcEd and FrEe pATTern sPEEdS
delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\del ta a_{\mbo x{\sc rip tsi ze  edg e}}/ a_{\mbox{\scri p tsiz e edge}}
\simeq 0.005\ %$. W ef inde mp irica lly tha t  t h e  si mu la tio ns ’  p atter n s peeds a re also un cer ta in by this f r ac tion, so $ \de lta\dot{\til de{ \omega }} _2\ s imeq0 .02 $ deg /day,w hich i s the ver ti c al ext e nt of t h e  g rayband around the s i mu l ated data in F ig. \[ m2 \ _f i g \]. 

R ather, thi sdiscr e pancy i s  i n d i rec t ly due to the  absence of the  $J_4$  a ndh igherterms  f r omthe N-bodysimu lations.To dem o nstrate this, r epeatthe  $\ sigm a _0 =2 00$  g m /cm $ ^2 $ s i mul ation wi th  $ J_2$boos t e d slig htl y by  fact or $f^\star=1 .03 9501 3 $ s o tha t the  sec on d zon al har monic  i s $J_2^\star=f^ \sta r J_2=0.0 169 34 294 $.  This increa ses  th e simul ated Br ing -e d g e ’s  angular velocitysl i g ht ly to $\ Omega_ { \m bo x {\script si zeedge } } =758. 8824 $  d eg/day,whichi sin  fact t he  ring’ stru e a ngula r  vel ocityat $a=a_ {\mbo x {\scriptsize e d ge}}$ when th e  h i g he r  ord er$J_4$ and $ J_6$ term s ar e  a lso accou ntedfo r [^ 3 ]. And since Saturn ’s  gravi tatio nal force the re is $a_{ \ m b ox{\scri ptsi z ee dge}}\Omega_{\ mbox{ \scriptsiz e  edge}}^ 2$, t his mean s that Sa t u rn’s gra vit y o n t hes i mu lated particl e s  at$r =a_{\mb ox{ \script siz e e dge }}$  i s in fact  the tru eva lu e.  No te th a t boosti ng  $J _2 $ t o the slight ly la rger  v al u e $ J_2^\st a r$ a lsore qu ires  br in gingthes imu lated M imas inwa rds andju st  interi or to its tru esemimajorax isby 2km . Which sp eeds up both the forced and fre e p atter n sp eeds, and  is  why t his simula tion’s  free  $ m=2 $ patte r n  s pee d$\dot{\til d e {\o mega} }_ 2$,which i s the cross in Fig .  \[ m2\_fig\], is  in  bet t e ragr e em e ntwi t h t h e  observed patte rn speed.So th e discrepa n cybe tween a ll theother simulat ed and ob served pa tt erns p eed s $\dot{\t ilde{\om ega}}_2$i s due to  thos e m odels’  n otaccou ntingf orthe a dditio na l grav ity t ha t is due  to the $J_4$ and highe r term s inSat urn’s obl ate fig ure. Comp ensa ting for t heabs enceoft hoseobla t en ess effec ts r e quires al t er ing t he  simulateds a t ell ite’s  or b its sl ight ly, which in turn alters the for ceda n d f ree patt er n speeds
delta\Omega/\Omega=1.5\delta a_{\mbox{\scriptsize_edge}}/a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}
\simeq_0.005\%$. We find empirically_that the_simulations’_pattern speeds_are_also uncertain by_this fraction, so_$\delta\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2\simeq0.02$ deg/day, which is_the vertical extent_of_the gray band around the simulated data in Fig. \[m2\_fig\].

Rather, this discrepancy is indirectly due_to_the absence_of_the_$J_4$ and higher terms from_the N-body simulations. To demonstrate_this, repeat_the $\sigma_0=200$ gm/cm$^2$ simulation with $J_2$ boosted slightly_by_factor $f^\star=1.0395013$ so_that the second zonal harmonic is $J_2^\star=f^\star J_2=0.016934294$. This_increases the simulated B ring-edge’s angular_velocity slightly to_$\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize_edge}}=758.8824$_deg/day, which is in_fact the ring’s true angular velocity_at $a=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}$ when the higher_order $J_4$ and $J_6$ terms are also_accounted for[^3]. And since Saturn’s gravitational_force there is $a_{\mbox{\scriptsize edge}}\Omega_{\mbox{\scriptsize_edge}}^2$, this_means that Saturn’s gravity on_the simulated particles_at $r=a_{\mbox{\scriptsize_edge}}$ is in_fact the true value. Note that_boosting $J_2$ to_the slightly larger value $J_2^\star$ also_requires_bringing the simulated_Mimas_inwards_and just_interior to its_true_semimajor axis_by_2km. Which speeds up both the_forced_and free pattern speeds, and is why_this simulation’s free $m=2$_pattern_speed $\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2$, which is_the cross in Fig. \[m2\_fig\], is_in better agreement with the observed_pattern speed._So the_discrepancy between all the other simulated and observed pattern speeds $\dot{\tilde{\omega}}_2$_is due to those models’ not_accounting for the additional_gravity that_is_due to the_$J_4$_and higher_terms in Saturn’s oblate figure. Compensating for_the absence_of those oblateness effects requires altering_the simulated satellite’s orbits_slightly,_which in turn alters the forced_and free pattern speeds