 frame co-rotating at frequency $\nu_{\rm rot}$. Therefore, pulsation frequencies in the observer’s frame for high-order g-modes and r-modes (for which $\nu({\rm crot})\ll |m|\nu_{\rm rot}$) tend to group depending on the $m$ value just as seen in Figure \[nute3p5\]. All the excited prograde modes ($m < 0$) seen in Figure \[nute3p5\] are sectoral ($\ell = |m|$) g-modes, while all the excited retrograde ($m > 0$) modes are r-modes (in which toroidal motion is dominant) in those rapidly rotating models. No retrograde g-modes are excited in this figure. We note that, as shown in Appendix A, the stability of pulsation modes differs considerably if we use the so-called traditional approximation in which the horizontal component of the angular velocity of rotation is neglected.

Under the assumption of $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.02$ mHz (1.73 cycles day$^{-1}$), the periodic light variations of $\beta$ CMi are approximately reproduced by r-modes of $(m,\ell)=(2,2)$. On the other hand, the observed variations are identified as sectoral prograde g-modes of $(m,\ell)=(-1,1)$ if we assume $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.03$ mHz (2.59 cycles day$^{-1}$). In the former case another three groups of frequencies are expected to be observed in the estimated $\log T_{\rm eff}$ range of $\beta$ CMi, while in the latter case only one group of frequencies should be observed (Fig.\[nute3p5\]). Since [*MOST*]{} has detected only one group of frequencies around 3.26 cycles day$^{-1}$ in $\beta$ CMi (§\[most\]), we conclude that a model rotating at $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.03$ mHz (2.59 cycles day$^{-1}$) is more appropriate.[^2] For this rotation rate pulsations excited at $\log T_{\rm eff}=4.083$ are prograde sectoral high-radial order (19th–33rd) g-modes. The frequencies in the co-rotating frame range over $0.586 ~{\rm cycles~day}^{-1} \ga \nu({\rm crot}) 
\ga 0.334 ~
frame co - rotating at frequency $ \nu_{\rm rot}$. Therefore, pulsation frequency in the perceiver ’s frame for high - decree guanine - modes and r - mood (for which $ \nu({\rm crot})\ll |m|\nu_{\rm rot}$) tend to group count on the $ m$ value just as see in Figure   \[nute3p5\ ]. All the excited prograde modes ($ m < 0 $) go steady in Figure   \[nute3p5\ ] are sectoral ($ \ell = |m|$) g - modes, while all the delirious retrograde ($ m > 0 $) mood are r - modality (in which toroidal motion is dominant) in those quickly rotating models. No retrograde g - mode are excited in this figure. We notice that, as shown in Appendix A, the constancy of pulsation modes differs considerably if we use the so - predict traditional approximation in which the horizontal component of the angular velocity of rotation is neglected. 

 Under the assumption of $ \nu_{\rm bunk } \approx 0.02 $ mHz (1.73 cycles   day$^{-1}$), the periodic light variations of $ \beta$ CMi are approximately reproduced by r - modes of $ (m,\ell)=(2,2)$. On the other hand, the observed mutant are identified as sectoral prograde g - modality of $ (m,\ell)=(-1,1)$ if we wear $ \nu_{\rm rot } \approx 0.03 $ mHz (2.59 cycles   day$^{-1}$). In the former case another three groups of frequencies are have a bun in the oven to be observed in the estimated $ \log T_{\rm eff}$ range of $ \beta$ CMi, while in the latter case only one group of frequency should be observed (Fig.\[nute3p5\ ]). Since [ * MOST * ] { } has detected only one group of frequencies around 3.26 cycle   day$^{-1}$ in $ \beta$ CMi (§ \[most\ ]), we reason that a exemplar rotating at $ \nu_{\rm rot } \approx 0.03 $ mHz (2.59 cycles   day$^{-1}$) is more appropriate.[^2 ] For this rotation pace pulsations excited at $ \log T_{\rm eff}=4.083 $ are prograde sectoral high - radial order (19th–33rd) g - modes. The frequencies in the co - rotating frame stove over $ 0.586 ~{\rm cycles ~ day}^{-1 } \ga \nu({\rm crot }) 
 \ga 0.334 ~
 frwme co-rotating at frequekcy $\nu_{\rm rot}$. Thetedore, pnlsatioh frequevcies in the observer’s frame fir hith-order g-modes and r-moaes (for wjich $\nu({\rn crir})\ll |m|\nu_{\rm ckt}$) tend to grkmp de'eiding on the $m$ yalue just ds seen in Figgrd \[nbte3p5\]. All the excited prograde modes ($i < 0$) seem ln Figure \[nute3p5\] are fectkgao ($\ell = |m|$) g-modes, while all the excitev retrograde ($m > 0$) modes are r-modes (in whicj togoidal motion is dlminant) in jgosq rapidly rotxting models. No retrogtade g-modes are excited in this wigurz. We note tyar, ad shown in A'pendiq A, the stability of [ulsatipn modes diffevs coisidwrably if we use the vo-called traditionwl approxhmction in which the hoeizontan cokpondbt uf uhe ahgular vemocity of dotation is neglected.

Under the afwumption of $\nh_{\rm roe} \wpprox 0.02$ mHz (1.73 cycles day$^{-1}$), the periodic ligvt bariations of $\beta$ CMi qre approximately reptoduced by r-modes of $(m,\ell)=(2,2)$. On the other hand, the observed vasiatikvs cvc iddbtlfied as sectoral prograde g-modes of $(m,\ell)=(-1,1)$ if rs ssxume $\nu_{\rm rot} \cpprox 0.03$ mHz (2.59 cycked dsi$^{-1}$). In the formet case chofher three groups lf freqoenciew are exptcted to be observed in the estinated $\log T_{\ri eff}$ range of $\beta$ CMi, while nn the lattrr case only one group uf fdequencies dhould be ubserved (Fig.\[nute3o5\]). Spnce [*MOST*]{} has detected only onq group oh freauencier arpund 3.26 sycles day$^{-1}$ ln $\bebd$ CMi (§\[most\]), we concpude jhat a model rotwting at $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.03$ mHz (2.59 rbcles day$^{-1}$) is mpra aipropriatz.[^2] For bhis rotation rwte pulsations exciteb at $\lug T_{\rm eff}=4.083$ are prmgrade sectjral high-radidp order (19th–33rd) g-modes. Ehe dreqyencies kn the co-rotatong frame range ovee $0.586 ~{\rm cycles~day}^{-1} \ga \nu({\tm crot}) 
\ga 0.334 ~
frame co-rotating at frequency $\nu_{\rm rot}$. Therefore, in observer’s frame high-order g-modes and |m|\nu_{\rm tend to group on the $m$ just as seen in Figure \[nute3p5\]. the excited prograde modes ($m < 0$) seen in Figure \[nute3p5\] are sectoral = |m|$) g-modes, while all the excited retrograde ($m > 0$) modes are (in toroidal is in those rapidly rotating models. No retrograde g-modes are excited in this figure. We note that, shown in Appendix A, the stability of pulsation differs considerably if we the so-called traditional approximation in the component of angular of is neglected. Under assumption of $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.02$ mHz (1.73 cycles day$^{-1}$), the periodic light variations of $\beta$ CMi approximately reproduced of $(m,\ell)=(2,2)$. the hand, observed variations are sectoral prograde g-modes of $(m,\ell)=(-1,1)$ if rot} \approx 0.03$ mHz (2.59 cycles day$^{-1}$). In former case three groups of frequencies are expected be observed in the estimated $\log T_{\rm eff}$ of $\beta$ CMi, while in the latter case only one group of frequencies should be Since [*MOST*]{} has detected one group of around cycles in CMi (§\[most\]), conclude that a model rotating at $\nu_{\rm rot} \approx 0.03$ mHz cycles day$^{-1}$) is more appropriate.[^2] For this rotation rate pulsations $\log eff}=4.083$ are prograde high-radial order (19th–33rd) g-modes. frequencies the co-rotating frame range ~{\rm \ga 0.334
 frame co-rotating at frequencY $\nu_{\rm rot}$. ThErefoRe, pUlsAtIon fRequEncies in the obsERver’S frame for high-order g-modEs and R-mODes (fOR wHich $\nU({\rm crot})\LL |m|\NU_{\Rm rOt}$) TeNd tO gROuP depeNdiNg on the $M$ value just As sEeN in Figure \[nutE3P5\]. ALl the excitEd pRograde modes ($M < 0$) seEn in FiGuRe \[nUTe3p5\] arE seCtoraL ($\ell = |m|$) g-MOdes, whIle all the ExCIted reTRograde ($M > 0$) MOdEs arE r-modes (in which torOIdAL motion is dominAnt) in tHoSE rAPIdlY roTating modeLs. no retROgrade g-MOdES ARe eXCited in this fiGure. We note tHAt, aS shown In appENdix A, tHe staBiLIty Of pulsation ModeS differs cOnsideRAbly if wE Use the sO-calleD trAdiTionAL aPpRoxImATioN In WhiCH thE horizonTaL cOmponEnt oF THE AnguLar VeloCity oF rotation is neGleCted.

uNdeR the aSsumpTion Of $\Nu_{\rm rOt} \apprOx 0.02$ mHz (1.73 CyCles day$^{-1}$), the perioDic lIght variaTioNs Of $\bEtA$ CMi aRE approXimAteLy reproDuced by R-ModEs OF $(M,\ElL)=(2,2)$. On the other hand, the ObSERvEd variatIons arE IdEnTIfied as sEcTorAl prOGRade g-ModeS Of $(M,\ell)=(-1,1)$ if we Assume $\NU_{\rM rOt} \approX 0.03$ mhz (2.59 cyclEs Day$^{-1}$). in tHe forMEr caSe anotHer three GroupS Of frequencies aRE expected to be OBsERVeD In thE esTimated $\log T_{\Rm efF}$ RangE of $\bETa$ cMi, WHile iN the lAtTEr CAse only one group of frEqUencieS shouLd be observed (FIg.\[nute3p5\]). SinCE [*moST*]{} has deTectED oNLy one group of frEquenCies around 3.26 CYcles day$^{-1}$ In $\betA$ CMi (§\[most\]), We concludE THat a modeL roTatIng At $\nU_{\RM rOt} \approx 0.03$ mHz (2.59 cyCLEs daY$^{-1}$) iS more apProPriate.[^2] FOr tHis RotAtiOn Rate pulsaTions excItEd At $\LoG T_{\rM eff}=4.083$ aRE progradE sEctOrAl hIgh-raDIal ordEr (19th–33rD) g-moDeS. THE frEquenciES iN THe co-RoTaTing FraMe Range Over $0.586 ~{\RM cyCles~day}^{-1} \Ga \nu({\rm croT}) 
\ga 0.334 ~
 frame co-rotating at freq uency $\nu _{\rm  ro t}$ .Ther efor e, pulsation f r eque ncies in the observer’ s fra me forh ig h-ord er g-mo d es a ndr- mo des  ( f or  whic h $ \nu({\r m crot})\l l | m| \nu_{\rm rot } $)  tend to g rou p dependingonthe $m $val u e jus t a s see n in F i gure \ [nute3p5\ ]. All th e  excite d pr ogra de modes ($m < 0$ )  s e en in Figure \ [nute3 p5 \ ]a r e s ect oral ($\el l= |m| $ ) g-mod e s, w h ile all the excit ed retrogra d e ( $m > 0 $)  mo d es are  r-mo de s  (i n which tor oida l motionis dom i nant) i n  thoserapidl y r ota ting mo de ls.  N o  re t ro gra d e g -modes a re  e xcite d in t h i s fi gur e. W e not e that, as sh own  inA ppe ndixA, th e st ab ility  of pu lsati on  modes differscons iderablyifwe  us ethe s o -calle d t rad itional  approx i mat io n i nwhich the horizont al c om ponent o f thea ng ul a r veloci ty  of  rot a t ion i s ne g le cted.

U nder t h eas sumptio nof $\n u_ {\r m r ot} \ a ppro x 0.02 $ mHz (1 .73 c y cles day$^{-1} $ ), the period i cl i gh t  var iat ions of $\b eta$ CMiarea pp rox i matel y rep ro d uc e d by r-modes of $(m ,\ ell)=( 2,2)$ . On the othe r hand, th e o bservedvari a ti o ns are identif ied a s sectoral prograde  g-mo des of $ (m,\ell)= ( - 1,1)$ if  we  as sum e $ \ n u_ {\rm rot} \ap p r ox 0 .0 3$ mHz(2. 59 cycl esday $^{ -1} $) . In theformer c as ean ot her  thre e  groupsof  fr eq uen ciesa re exp ected  tobe  o b ser ved int he e stim at ed  $\l ogT_ {\rmeff} $  ra nge of$\beta$ C Mi, whil ein  the la tter case onl yone groupof  fr equenc i e s should  be observed (Fig.\[nut e 3p5\]).  Si nce [ *MOS T*]{} has  de tected  on l y onegroupof fr eq uen c i es ar o u nd  3. 26  cycles da y $ ^{- 1}$ i n$\be ta$ CMi  (§\[most\]), we c o ncl ude that a mo del  rot a t in g a t  $ \ nu_ {\ r m r o t } \approx 0.03$  mHz (2.59  c y cl es day$^{- 1 }$)  i s moreappropr iate. [ ^2] For  this rot ation rat epuls a t ion s excitedat $\log  T_{\rm e f f}=4. 0 83 $ are  pr ograde  s ect oralhigh-r a dia l ord er (19 th –33rd)  g-mo de s. The f requencies in the co-ro tating  fram e r ange over  $0 . 586  ~{\rm cy cles ~day}^{-1}  \g a \ nu({\ rmc rot})  
\g a  0 .33 4  ~
 frame_co-rotating at_frequency $\nu_{\rm rot}$. Therefore,_pulsation frequencies_in_the observer’s_frame_for high-order g-modes_and r-modes (for_which $\nu({\rm crot})\ll |m|\nu_{\rm_rot}$) tend to_group_depending on the $m$ value just as seen in Figure \[nute3p5\]. All the excited prograde_modes_($m <_0$)_seen_in Figure \[nute3p5\] are sectoral ($\ell_= |m|$) g-modes, while all_the excited_retrograde ($m > 0$) modes are r-modes (in_which_toroidal motion is_dominant) in those rapidly rotating models. No retrograde g-modes_are excited in this figure. We_note that, as_shown_in_Appendix A, the stability_of pulsation modes differs considerably if_we use the so-called traditional approximation_in which the horizontal component of the_angular velocity of rotation is neglected.

Under_the assumption of $\nu_{\rm rot}_\approx 0.02$_mHz (1.73 cycles day$^{-1}$), the periodic_light variations of_$\beta$ CMi_are approximately reproduced_by r-modes of $(m,\ell)=(2,2)$. On the_other hand, the_observed variations are identified as sectoral_prograde_g-modes of $(m,\ell)=(-1,1)$_if_we_assume $\nu_{\rm_rot} \approx 0.03$_mHz_(2.59 cycles day$^{-1}$)._In_the former case another three groups_of_frequencies are expected to be observed in_the estimated $\log T_{\rm_eff}$_range of $\beta$ CMi,_while in the latter case_only one group of frequencies should_be observed_(Fig.\[nute3p5\]). Since_[*MOST*]{} has detected only one group of frequencies around 3.26 cycles day$^{-1}$_in $\beta$ CMi (§\[most\]), we conclude_that a model rotating_at $\nu_{\rm_rot}_\approx 0.03$ mHz_(2.59_cycles day$^{-1}$) is_more appropriate.[^2] For this rotation rate pulsations_excited at_$\log T_{\rm eff}=4.083$ are prograde sectoral_high-radial order (19th–33rd) g-modes._The_frequencies in the co-rotating frame range_over $0.586 ~{\rm cycles~day}^{-1} \ga \nu({\rm_crot}) 
\ga 0.334 ~