 M[" o]{}bius function, the Liouville function, divisor functions, and coefficients of automorphic forms (or if one prefers an axiomatic approach, $L$-functions in the Selberg class) satisfying a Ramanujan bound are all covered by this framework.

When $f(p)\approx v$ in an appropriately strong form, Selberg [@selberg] built on ideas of Landau [@landau; @landau2] to prove that [ $$\label{Selberg}\begin{split} 
\sum_{n\le x} f(n) = \frac{c(f,v)}{\Gamma(v)} x(\log x)^{v-1} + O_f(x(\log x)^{v-2}),
 \end{split}$$ ]{} where $c(f,v)$ is some a non-zero constant given in terms of an Euler product. Delange [@delange] strengthened this theorem to a full asymptotic expansion: $$\sum_{n\le x} f(n) = x(\log x)^{v-1} \sum_{j=0}^{J-1} \frac{c_j(f,v)}{\Gamma(v-j)(\log x)^j}  
    + O(x(\log x)^{v-1-J})$$ for any $J\in{\mathbb{N}}$, where $c_0(f,v)=c(f,v)$. In particular, if $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$, then the partial sums of $f$ satisfy the bound [ $$\label{f-small}\begin{split} 
\sum_{n\le x} f(n) \ll \frac{x}{(\log x)^A} \qquad(x\ge 2) 
 \end{split}$$ ]{} for any $A>0$.

This paper is concerned with the converse problem: assuming that holds for some $A>D+1$, what can be deduced about $f(p)$? If we already knew that $f(p)\approx v$ on average, then relation would imply that $|v|\le D$. Comparing with, we conclude that $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots,-D\}$. The goal of this paper is to prove such a converse result to the Landau-Selberg-Delange theorem without assuming prior knowledge of the average behavior of $f(p)$.


M [ " o]{}bius function, the Liouville function, divisor functions, and coefficients of automorphic form (or if one prefer an axiomatic approach, $ L$-functions in the Selberg class) satisfying a Ramanujan restrict are all covered by this framework. 

 When $ f(p)\approx v$ in an appropriately solid shape, Selberg [ @selberg ] built on idea of Landau [ @landau; @landau2 ] to prove that [ $ $ \label{Selberg}\begin{split } 
 \sum_{n\le x } f(n) = \frac{c(f, v)}{\Gamma(v) } x(\log x)^{v-1 } + O_f(x(\log x)^{v-2 }), 
  \end{split}$$ ] { } where $ c(f, v)$ is some a non - zero constant given in term of an Euler product. Delange [ @delange ] strengthened this theorem to a full asymptotic expansion: $ $ \sum_{n\le x } f(n) = x(\log x)^{v-1 } \sum_{j=0}^{J-1 } \frac{c_j(f, v)}{\Gamma(v - j)(\log x)^j }  
     + O(x(\log x)^{v-1 - J})$$ for any $ J\in{\mathbb{N}}$, where $ c_0(f, v)=c(f, v)$. In particular, if $ v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$, then the partial sums of $ f$ satisfy the oblige [ $ $ \label{f - small}\begin{split } 
 \sum_{n\le x } f(n) \ll \frac{x}{(\log x)^A } \qquad(x\ge 2) 
  \end{split}$$ ] { } for any $ A>0$. 

 This paper is concerned with the converse problem: bear that holds for some $ A > D+1 $, what can be deduced about $ f(p)$? If we already knew that $ f(p)\approx v$ on modal, then relation would imply that $ |v|\le D$. Comparing with, we conclude that $ v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots,-D\}$. The goal of this newspaper is to prove such a converse result to the Landau - Selberg - Delange theorem without assuming prior knowledge of the average behavior of $ f(p)$.
 M[" l]{}bius function, the Liouvllle function, dirusor fnnctiona, and codfficients of automorphic focms (ir if one prefers an axiomagic approwch, $L$-funxtiois in the Selberj class) satisfglng a Camanujan bound are all cmvered by this ffalework.

When $f(p)\approx v$ in an appropryately xtgong form, Selbgrg [@stlbqrg] gliot on ideas of Landau [@landau; @mandau2] uo prove that [ $$\labrl{Selberg}\begin{split} 
\sum_{n\le x} f(j) = \frac{c(f,v)}{\Gamma(v)} x(\pog x)^{v-1} + O_f(x(\oog v)^{c-2}),
 \end{split}$$ ]{} dhere $c(f,v)$ pv some a nkn-zero constant given in terms uf an Euler proeuxt. Fglange [@delanje] strvngthened this theorek to a gull asymptotig expensiin: $$\sum_{n\le x} f(n) = x(\log e)^{v-1} \sum_{j=0}^{J-1} \frac{c_j(f,v)}{\Gamia(v-j)(\log x)^b}  
    + O(x(\log x)^{v-1-J})$$ fir any $B\in{\mdthbc{B}}$, wfert $c_0(h,v)=c(r,v)$. In oarvicular, if $b\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$, theb the partial sums pf $d$ satisfy the bound [ $$\jabel{f-small}\begin{split} 
\sum_{n\le x} f(n) \ll \frdc{x}{(\mog x)^A} \qquad(x\ge 2) 
 \end{spoit}$$ ]{} for any $A>0$.

This paker is conserned with the converse problem: assuming that honds fkf simc $A>D+1$, qhwt can be deduced about $f(p)$? If we already knew fhst $f(p)\approx v$ on average, thrn rrjation would kmply cgaf $|v|\le D$. Comparing aith, we concoude that $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\cots,-D\}$. The goal of this papee is to provv suxh a converse resupt to the Lcndau-Sglberg-Celange theorem without asshming prior knowledgs of the average cehsvhor of $f(k)$.


M[" o]{}bius function, the Liouville function, divisor coefficients automorphic forms if one prefers the class) satisfying a bound are all by this framework. When $f(p)\approx v$ an appropriately strong form, Selberg [@selberg] built on ideas of Landau [@landau; @landau2] prove that [ $$\label{Selberg}\begin{split} \sum_{n\le x} f(n) = \frac{c(f,v)}{\Gamma(v)} x(\log x)^{v-1} + O_f(x(\log \end{split}$$ where is a non-zero constant given in terms of an Euler product. Delange [@delange] strengthened this theorem to full asymptotic expansion: $$\sum_{n\le x} f(n) = x(\log \sum_{j=0}^{J-1} \frac{c_j(f,v)}{\Gamma(v-j)(\log x)^j} + x)^{v-1-J})$$ for any $J\in{\mathbb{N}}$, where In if $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$, the sums $f$ satisfy the [ $$\label{f-small}\begin{split} \sum_{n\le x} f(n) \ll \frac{x}{(\log x)^A} \qquad(x\ge 2) \end{split}$$ ]{} for any $A>0$. This paper concerned with problem: assuming holds some what can be $f(p)$? If we already knew that average, then relation would imply that $|v|\le D$. with, we that $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots,-D\}$. The goal of this is to prove such a converse result to Landau-Selberg-Delange theorem without assuming prior knowledge of the average behavior of $f(p)$.
 M[" o]{}bius function, the LiouvillE function, dIvisoR fuNctIoNs, anD coeFficients of autOMorpHic forms (or if one prefers An axiOmATic aPPrOach, $L$-FunctioNS iN THe SElBeRg cLaSS) sAtisfYinG a RamanUjan bound aRe aLl Covered by thiS FrAmework.

WheN $f(p)\Approx v$ in an aPprOpriatElY stROng foRm, SElberG [@selbeRG] built On ideas of laNDau [@lanDAu; @landaU2] TO pRove That [ $$\label{Selberg}\bEGiN{Split} 
\sum_{n\le x} f(n) = \Frac{c(f,V)}{\GAMmA(V)} X(\loG x)^{v-1} + o_f(x(\log x)^{v-2}),
 \enD{sPlit}$$ ]{} wHEre $c(f,v)$ iS SoME A Non-ZEro constant giVen in terms oF An EUler prOdUct. dElange [@DelanGe] STreNgthened thiS theOrem to a fuLl asymPTotic exPAnsion: $$\sUm_{n\le x} F(n) = x(\Log X)^{v-1} \suM_{J=0}^{J-1} \FrAc{c_J(f,V)}{\gamMA(v-J)(\loG X)^j}  
    + O(X(\log x)^{v-1-J})$$ fOr AnY $J\in{\mAthbB{n}}$, WHEre $c_0(F,v)=c(F,v)$. In PartiCular, if $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dotS\}$, thEn thE ParTial sUms of $F$ satIsFy the Bound [ $$\lAbel{f-SmAll}\begin{split} 
\suM_{n\le X} f(n) \ll \frac{X}{(\loG x)^a} \qqUaD(x\ge 2) 
 \eND{split}$$ ]{} For Any $a>0$.

This paPer is coNCerNeD WITh The converse problem: AsSUMiNg that hoLds for SOmE $A>d+1$, What can bE dEduCed aBOUt $f(p)$? IF we aLReAdy knew tHat $f(p)\aPPrOx V$ on averAgE, then rElAtiOn wOuld iMPly tHat $|v|\le d$. CompariNg witH, We conclude that $V\In\{0,-1,-2,\dots,-D\}$. The goaL Of THIs PAper Is tO prove such a ConvERse rEsulT To The lAndau-selbeRg-dElANge theorem without asSuMing prIor knOwledge of the aVerage behaVIOR of $f(p)$.


 M[" o]{}bius function, th e Liouvill e fun cti on,  d ivis or f unctions, andc oeff icients of automorphic  form s( or i f  o ne pr efers a n  a x i oma ti capp ro a ch , $L$ -fu nctions  in the Se lbe rg  class) sati s fy ing a Rama nuj an bound are  al l cove re d b y  this  fr amewo rk.

W h en $f( p)\approx  v $  in an appropr i a te ly s trong form, Selbe r g[ @selberg] buil t on i de a so f  La nda u [@landau ;@land a u2] top ro v e tha t  [ $$\label{S elberg}\beg i n{s plit}
\ sum _ {n\lex} f( n) = \ frac{c(f,v) }{\G amma(v)}x(\log x)^{v-1 }  + O_f( x(\log  x) ^{v -2}) , 
\e nd{ sp l it} $ $]{} whe re $c(f, v) $is so me a n o n -zer o c onst ant g iven in terms  of  anE ule r pro duct.  Del an ge [@ delang e] st re ngthened this t heor em to a f ull  a sym pt otice xpansi on:  $$ \sum_{n \le x}f (n)  = x ( \l og x)^{v-1} \sum_{ j= 0 } ^{ J-1} \fr ac{c_j ( f, v) } {\Gamma( v- j)( \log x )^j} 
  +  O(x(\lo g x)^{ v -1 -J })$$ fo rany $J \i n{\ mat hbb{N } }$,where$c_0(f,v )=c(f , v)$. In partic u lar, if $v\in \ {0 , - 1, - 2,\d ots \}$, then t he p a rtia l su m sof$ f$ sa tisfy  t h eb ound [ $$\label{f-s ma ll}\be gin{s plit} 
\sum_{ n\le x} f( n ) \ll \fra c{x} { (\ l og x)^A} \qqua d(x\g e 2) 
 \en d {split}$ $ ]{}  for any  $A>0$.
T h is paper  is  co nce rne d wi th the conver s e  pro bl em: ass umi ng that  ho lds  fo r s om e $A>D+1$ , what c an  b ede duc ed ab o ut $f(p) $?  If  w e a lread y  knewthat$f(p )\ ap p rox  v$ ona ve r a ge,th en  rel ati on  woul d im p lythat $| v|\le D$.  Co m pari ng  w ith, we  conclude tha t$v\in\{0,- 1, -2, \dots, - D \}$. The  goal of this paper ist o prove  su ch aconv erse resu ltto the  La n dau-Se lberg- Delan ge  th e o rem w i t ho utas suming pri o r  kn owled ge  ofthe ave rage behavior of $ f (p) $.


 M["_o]{}bius function,_the Liouville function, divisor_functions, and_coefficients_of automorphic_forms_(or if one_prefers an axiomatic_approach, $L$-functions in the_Selberg class) satisfying_a_Ramanujan bound are all covered by this framework.

When $f(p)\approx v$ in an appropriately strong_form,_Selberg [@selberg]_built_on_ideas of Landau [@landau; @landau2]_to prove that [ $$\label{Selberg}\begin{split}_
\sum_{n\le x}_f(n) = \frac{c(f,v)}{\Gamma(v)} x(\log x)^{v-1} + O_f(x(\log x)^{v-2}),
_\end{split}$$_]{} where $c(f,v)$_is some a non-zero constant given in terms of_an Euler product. Delange [@delange] strengthened_this theorem to_a_full_asymptotic expansion: $$\sum_{n\le x}_f(n) = x(\log x)^{v-1} \sum_{j=0}^{J-1} \frac{c_j(f,v)}{\Gamma(v-j)(\log_x)^j}  
   _+ O(x(\log x)^{v-1-J})$$ for any $J\in{\mathbb{N}}$, where_$c_0(f,v)=c(f,v)$. In particular, if $v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$, then_the partial sums of $f$_satisfy the_bound [ $$\label{f-small}\begin{split} 
\sum_{n\le x}_f(n) \ll \frac{x}{(\log_x)^A} \qquad(x\ge_2) 
 \end{split}$$_]{} for any $A>0$.

This paper is_concerned with the_converse problem: assuming that holds for_some_$A>D+1$, what can_be_deduced_about $f(p)$?_If we already_knew_that $f(p)\approx_v$_on average, then relation would imply_that_$|v|\le D$. Comparing with, we conclude that_$v\in\{0,-1,-2,\dots,-D\}$. The goal of_this_paper is to prove_such a converse result to_the Landau-Selberg-Delange theorem without assuming prior_knowledge of_the average_behavior of $f(p)$.

