widetilde{\lambda }%
_{n}\right\} _{n\geq 0}$, $H=\widetilde{H}$ and $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $%
\left( \pi /2,\pi \right) $ then $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x),$ a.e. in $[0,\pi ]$ and $h=\widetilde{h}$.

It is clear that the following equality holds$$D_{x}^{\alpha }\left[ \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi
(x,\lambda )-\varphi (x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }%
(x,\lambda )\right] =\left[ q(x)-\widetilde{q}(x)\right] \varphi (x,\lambda )%
\widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )$$By integrating (in the conformable fractional integral) both sides of this equality on $\left[ 0,\pi \right],$ we obtain$$\left[ \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi (x,\lambda
)-\varphi (x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )\right]
_{0}^{\pi }=\int\limits_{0}^{\pi }\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}(t)\right]
\varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha }t.$$Since $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $\left( \pi /2,\pi \right) $ and from (4), it is obvious that $$\left. \widetilde{\varphi }(\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi (\pi
,\lambda )-\varphi (\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }(\pi
,\lambda )=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}%
(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha
}t\right.$$Let$$\left. H(\lambda ):=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ q(t)-%
\widetilde{q}(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda
)d_{\alpha
widetilde{\lambda }% 
 _ { n}\right\ } _ { n\geq 0}$, $ H=\widetilde{H}$ and $ q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $% 
 \left (\pi /2,\pi \right) $ then $ q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x),$ a.e. in $ [ 0,\pi ] $ and $ h=\widetilde{h}$. 

 It is clear that the following equality holds$$D_{x}^{\alpha } \left [ \widetilde{\varphi } (x,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \varphi 
 (x,\lambda) -\varphi (x,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \widetilde{\varphi }% 
 (x,\lambda) \right ] = \left [ q(x)-\widetilde{q}(x)\right ] \varphi (x,\lambda)% 
 \widetilde{\varphi } (x,\lambda) $ $ By integrating (in the conformable fractional integral) both side of this equality on $ \left [ 0,\pi \right],$ we obtain$$\left [ \widetilde{\varphi } (x,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \varphi (x,\lambda 
) -\varphi (x,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \widetilde{\varphi } (x,\lambda) \right ] 
 _ { 0}^{\pi } = \int\limits_{0}^{\pi } \left [ q(t)-\widetilde{q}(t)\right ] 
 \varphi (t,\lambda) \widetilde{\varphi } (t,\lambda) d_{\alpha } t.$$Since $ q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $ \left (\pi /2,\pi \right) $ and from (4), it is obvious that $ $ \left. \widetilde{\varphi } (\pi,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \varphi (\pi 
, \lambda) -\varphi (\pi,\lambda) D_{x}^{\alpha } \widetilde{\varphi } (\pi 
, \lambda) = h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left [ q(t)-\widetilde{q}% 
 (t)\right ] \varphi (t,\lambda) \widetilde{\varphi } (t,\lambda) d_{\alpha 
 } t\right.$$Let$$\left. H(\lambda ): = h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left [ q(t)-% 
 \widetilde{q}(t)\right ] \varphi (t,\lambda) \widetilde{\varphi } (t,\lambda 
) d_{\alpha
widftilde{\lambda }%
_{n}\right\} _{n\geq 0}$, $H=\widetilde{H}$ aue $q(x)=\wivetilde{s}(x)$ on $%
\lewt( \pi /2,\pi \right) $ then $q(x)=\widetmlde{w}(x),$ a.e. in $[0,\pi ]$ and $h=\widetilde{f}$.

It is clvar that rhe hollowing equalivg holds$$D_{x}^{\alphz }\lefc[ \xidetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{f}^{\alpha }\varphi
(x,\naobba )-\varphi (x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\vwrphi }%
(x,\kalbda )\right] =\lefj[ q(x)-\wpdqtilsv{q}(w)\right] \varphi (x,\lambda )%
\widetilde{\vzrphi }(x,\nambda )$$By intrgrating (in the conformablf frwctional integral) hoth sides if trus equality un $\left[ 0,\pi \right],$ we objain$$\left[ \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\al'ha }\varphi (z,\lqmbfd
)-\varphi (x,\lanbda )Q_{x}^{\alpha }\widebplde{\var[hi }(x,\lakbda )\right]
_{0}^{\pi }=\ikt\limmts_{0}^{\pu }\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}(t)\rmght]
\varphi (t,\lambda )\wydetilde{\vdr'hi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha }t.$$Sunxe $q(x)=\fidedildd{w}(x)$ un $\meht( \li /2,\pi \gigit) $ and froj (4), it is obcious that $$\left. \widttijee{\varphi }(\pi,\lajbda )D_{v}^{\ajpha }\varphi (\pi
,\lambda )-\varphi (\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\dlpga }\widetilde{\varphi }(\pi
,\lanbda )=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\lilits_{0}^{\pi /2}\lest[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}%
(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\var[hi }(t,\mxmbbq )d_{\aloya
}h\right.$$Let$$\left. H(\lambda ):=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\jsfu[ q(n)-%
\widetilde{q}(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lakbfa )\ridetilde{\varpfi }(t,\lambdz
)d_{\alpha
widetilde{\lambda }% _{n}\right\} _{n\geq 0}$, $H=\widetilde{H}$ and $% \pi /2,\pi $ then $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x),$ $h=\widetilde{h}$. is clear that following equality holds$$D_{x}^{\alpha \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi (x,\lambda )-\varphi )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }% (x,\lambda )\right] =\left[ q(x)-\widetilde{q}(x)\right] \varphi (x,\lambda )% \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )$$By (in the conformable fractional integral) both sides of this equality on $\left[ 0,\pi we \widetilde{\varphi )D_{x}^{\alpha (x,\lambda )-\varphi (x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )\right] _{0}^{\pi }=\int\limits_{0}^{\pi }\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $\left( \pi /2,\pi \right) $ and (4), it is obvious $$\left. \widetilde{\varphi }(\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi ,\lambda (\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }(\pi )=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi q(t)-\widetilde{q}% (t)\right] \varphi )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha }t\right.$$Let$$\left. H(\lambda ):=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ q(t)-% \widetilde{q}(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha
widetilde{\lambda }%
_{n}\right\} _{n\geq 0}$, $h=\widetilde{h}$ and $q(X)=\wiDetIlDe{q}(x)$ On $%
\leFt( \pi /2,\pi \right) $ theN $Q(x)=\wiDetilde{q}(x),$ a.e. in $[0,\pi ]$ and $h=\widEtildE{h}$.

iT is cLEaR that The follOWiNG EquAlItY hoLdS$$d_{x}^{\Alpha }\LefT[ \widetiLde{\varphi }(x,\LamBdA )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varpHI
(x,\Lambda )-\varpHi (x,\Lambda )D_{x}^{\alphA }\wiDetildE{\vArpHI }%
(x,\lamBda )\Right] =\Left[ q(x)-\WIdetilDe{q}(x)\right] \VaRPhi (x,\laMBda )%
\wideTILdE{\varPhi }(x,\lambda )$$By integRAtINg (in the conformAble frAcTIoNAL inTegRal) both sidEs Of thiS EqualitY On $\LEFT[ 0,\pi \RIght],$ we obtain$$\lEft[ \widetildE{\VarPhi }(x,\laMbDa )D_{X}^{\Alpha }\vArphi (X,\lAMbdA
)-\varphi (x,\lamBda )D_{X}^{\alpha }\widEtilde{\VArphi }(x,\lAMbda )\rigHt]
_{0}^{\pi }=\inT\liMitS_{0}^{\pi }\lEFt[ Q(t)-\WidEtILde{Q}(T)\rIghT]
\VarPhi (t,\lambDa )\WiDetilDe{\vaRPHI }(T,\lamBda )D_{\alpHa }t.$$SiNce $q(x)=\widetildE{q}(x)$ On $\leFT( \pi /2,\Pi \rigHt) $ and From (4), It Is obvIous thAt $$\lefT. \wIdetilde{\varphi }(\pI,\lamBda )D_{x}^{\alphA }\vaRpHi (\pI
,\lAmbda )-\VArphi (\pI,\laMbdA )D_{x}^{\alphA }\widetiLDe{\vArPHI }(\Pi
,\Lambda )=h-\widetilde{h}+\iNt\LIMiTs_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ Q(t)-\wideTIlDe{Q}%
(T)\right] \vaRpHi (t,\LambDA )\WidetIlde{\VArPhi }(t,\lambDa )d_{\alpHA
}t\RiGht.$$Let$$\lEfT. H(\lambDa ):=H-\wiDetIlde{h}+\INt\liMits_{0}^{\pi /2}\Left[ q(t)-%
\wiDetilDE{q}(t)\right] \varphi (T,\Lambda )\widetilDE{\vARPhI }(T,\lamBda
)D_{\alpha
widetilde{\lambda }%
_{n}\ right\} _{ n\geq  0} $,$H =\wi deti lde{H}$ and $q ( x)=\ widetilde{q}(x)$ on $% 
\lef t( \pi/ 2, \pi \ right)$  t h e n $ q( x) =\w id e ti lde{q }(x ),$ a.e . in $[0,\ pi]$  and $h=\wid e ti lde{h}$.
Itis clear tha t t he fol lo win g  equa lit y hol ds$$D_ { x}^{\a lpha }\le ft [  \wide t ilde{\v a r ph i }( x,\lambda )D_{x}^ { \a l pha }\varphi
( x,\lam bd a  ) - \ var phi  (x,\lambd a)D_{x } ^{\alph a  } \ w i det i lde{\varphi } %
(x,\lambd a  )\ right]  = \le f t[ q(x )-\wi de t ild e{q}(x)\rig ht]\varphi ( x,\lam b da )%
\ w idetild e{\var phi  }( x,\l a mb da  )$ $B y  in t eg rat i ng(in theco nf ormab le f r a c t iona l i nteg ral)both sides of  th is e q ual ity o n $\l eft[  0 ,\pi\right ],$ w eobtain$$\left[\wid etilde{\v arp hi  }( x, \lamb d a )D_{ x}^ {\a lpha }\ varphi( x,\ la m b d a)-\varphi (x,\lamb da ) D_ {x}^{\al pha }\ w id et i lde{\var ph i } (x,\ l a mbda)\ri g ht ]
_{0}^{ \pi }= \ in t\ limits_ {0 }^{\pi  } \le ft[  q(t) - \wid etilde {q}(t)\r ight] \varphi (t,\la m bda )\widetil d e{ \ v ar p hi } (t, \lambda )d_ {\al p ha } t.$$ S in ce$ q(x)= \wide ti l de { q}(x)$ on $\left( \ pi  /2,\p i \ri ght) $ and fr om (4), it i s  obvious  tha t  $ $ \left. \wideti lde{\ varphi }(\ p i,\lambd a )D_ {x}^{\al pha }\var p h i (\pi
, \la mbd a ) -\v a r ph i (\pi,\lambd a )D_{ x} ^{\alph a } \wideti lde {\v arp hi}( \pi
,\lam bda )=h- \w id et il de{ h}+\i n t\limits _{ 0}^ {\ pi/2}\l e ft[ q( t)-\w idet il de { q}% 
(t)\ri g ht ] \var ph i(t,\ lam bd a )\w idet i lde {\varph i }(t,\la mbd a  )d_ {\ al pha
}t\ right.$$Let$$ \l eft. H(\la mb da):=h-\ w i detilde{ h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\lef t[q(t)- %
\w idetilde{ q}( t)\rig ht] \varph i (t,\ lambd a)\w i d etild e { \v arp hi  }(t,\lamb d a 
)d _{\al ph a
widetilde{\lambda }%
_{n}\right\}__{n\geq 0}$,_$H=\widetilde{H}$ and $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on_$%
\left( \pi_/2,\pi_\right) $_then_$q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x),$ a.e. in_$[0,\pi ]$ and_$h=\widetilde{h}$.

It is clear that_the following equality_holds$$D_{x}^{\alpha_}\left[ \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi
(x,\lambda )-\varphi (x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }%
(x,\lambda )\right] =\left[ q(x)-\widetilde{q}(x)\right] \varphi_(x,\lambda_)%
\widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda_)$$By_integrating_(in the conformable fractional integral)_both sides of this equality_on $\left[_0,\pi \right],$ we obtain$$\left[ \widetilde{\varphi }(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi_(x,\lambda
)-\varphi_(x,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi_}(x,\lambda )\right]
_{0}^{\pi }=\int\limits_{0}^{\pi }\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}(t)\right]
\varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha_}t.$$Since $q(x)=\widetilde{q}(x)$ on $\left( \pi /2,\pi_\right) $ and_from_(4),_it is obvious that_$$\left. \widetilde{\varphi }(\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\varphi (\pi
,\lambda_)-\varphi (\pi,\lambda )D_{x}^{\alpha }\widetilde{\varphi }(\pi
,\lambda )=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi_/2}\left[ q(t)-\widetilde{q}%
(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda )\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda )d_{\alpha
}t\right.$$Let$$\left._H(\lambda ):=h-\widetilde{h}+\int\limits_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ q(t)-%
\widetilde{q}(t)\right] \varphi (t,\lambda_)\widetilde{\varphi }(t,\lambda
)d_{\alpha