 that $h_{rr}$ can be eliminated by using the constraint equation. So, one finally would get a complicated equation of $A$, which will not be listed here. Our calculation shows that by defining a new variable $\mathcal{G} \equiv \theta A$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\theta\equiv \frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\prime}}}}{{\sqrt {3{f_R}} \left( {\frac{{a'}}{a} + \frac{{f_R^{\prime}}}{{3{f_R}}}} \right)}},\end{aligned}$$ the final equation can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{scalarPert}
\square^{(4)}\mathcal{G}+\mathcal{G}''-\frac{\theta''}{\theta}\mathcal{G}=0.\end{aligned}$$ This equation is nothing but the same one obtained in the quadratical action apporach either in the Einstein frame  or in the higher-order frame [@ZhongLiu2017]. In sum, the curvature gauge leads to equivalent scalar perturbation equation, no matter from the quadratic action or the equation of motion approach. Using the theory of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, it is easy to show that any domain wall solution with $f_R>0$ is stable against linear perturbations (see Ref.  for detail).

Summary {#secSum}
=======

This work sets an example on how to directly linearize a higher-order gravitational theory in the equation of motion approach. For simplicity, we only consider a simple model, namely, a five-dimensional pure metric $f(R)$ gravity with warped geometry. In literature, one usually introduces a conformal transformation to rewrite the higher-order $f(R)$ theory into a second-order Einstein-scalar theory, and then conducts the linearization in the later frame. But the equivalence between these two different frames to the linear-order perturbations is seldom discussed. Besides, for more general higher-order curvature gravitational theories, conformal transformation might not be convenient any more. In that case, one needs to confront the direct linearization of the corresponding theory. In Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017] we discussed the first direct linearization of warped $f(R)$ domain wall in the quadratic action approach. The present work reconsiders the linearization of the same model of Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017] but follows a different approach,
that $ h_{rr}$ can be eliminated by using the constraint equation. therefore, one ultimately would get a complicated equation of $ A$, which will not be listed here. Our calculation prove that by defining a new variable star $ \mathcal{G } \equiv \theta A$ with $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \theta\equiv \frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\prime}}}}{{\sqrt { 3{f_R } } \left ({ \frac{{a'}}{a } + \frac{{f_R^{\prime}}}{{3{f_R } } } } \right)}},\end{aligned}$$ the final equation can be written as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{scalarPert } 
 \square^{(4)}\mathcal{G}+\mathcal{G}''-\frac{\theta''}{\theta}\mathcal{G}=0.\end{aligned}$$ This equality is nothing but the like one obtained in the quadratical action apporach either in the Einstein skeletal system    or in the higher - order frame   [ @ZhongLiu2017 ]. In kernel, the curvature gauge leads to equivalent scalar perturbation equation, no matter from the quadratic military action or the equation of motion approach. use the theory of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, it is easy to show that any sphere wall solution with $ f_R>0 $ is stable against linear perturbations (see Ref.    for contingent). 

 Summary { # secSum } 
 = = = = = = = 

 This work sets an example on how to directly linearize a higher - order gravitational hypothesis in the equality of gesture approach. For simplicity, we only consider a simple model, namely, a five - dimensional arrant measured $ f(R)$ graveness with warped geometry. In literature, one usually introduces a conformal transformation to rewrite the higher - decree $ f(R)$ theory into a second - order Einstein - scalar theory, and then conduct the linearization in the late frame. But the equivalence between these two unlike frames to the linear - order perturbations is seldom discussed. Besides, for more general higher - order curvature gravitational theories, conformal transformation might not be convenient any more. In that case, one need to confront the direct linearization of the comparable hypothesis. In Ref.   [ @ZhongLiu2017 ] we discourse the first direct linearization of warped $ f(R)$ knowledge domain wall in the quadratic action approach. The present workplace reconsiders the linearization of the same model of Ref.   [ @ZhongLiu2017 ] but follows a unlike approach,
 thwt $h_{rr}$ can be eliminated by using the constraiit equafion. So, une finally would get a comppixated equation of $A$, which wkll not bv listed yere. Iur calculefion shows thzb by behining a new vatiable $\mathcdl{G} \equiv \thetd X$ cith $$\begin{aligned}
\theta\equiv \frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\pwime}}}}{{\sqry {3{v_R}} \left( {\frac{{a'}}{a} + \frss{{f_R^{\pdpmt}}}{{3{f_R}}}} \right)}},\end{aligned}$$ the final equztion cen be written ax $$\begin{aligned}
\label{scalarPfrt}
\seuare^{(4)}\mathcal{G}+\mathcwl{G}''-\frac{\thetq''}{\theeq}\mathcal{G}=0.\end{xligned}$$ Thpv equation is nothing but the same one obgaineb in the quqdeatlwal action epporabh either in bne Einvtein ftame  or in the hijher-irder frame [@ZhongLiu2017]. Ii sum, the curvature dauge leags to equivalent scqlqr petturbdtiov eqjatjoi, nk mattfr hrom the quzdratic actuon or the equation os motion approzch. Usynd the theory of supersymmetric quantum kecganics, it is easy to shiw that any domain wapl solutijn with $f_R>0$ is stable against linear perturbations (see Cew.  fir awtwil).

Summary {#secSum}
=======

This work sets an example on goe no directly lineavize a higher-order ggafytational theury in ths equation of motiln apprjach. Dor simplycitu, we only consider a simple model, namelj, a dive-dimensional puxe metric $f(R)$ grafity eith warped geometry. In litsrature, one usually jvtroduces a confurmsl transformation to rewrite the highxr-ordzr $f(R)$ thdory into w second-orfer Eltstein-scalar theorj, and tven conduchs the linearization in the latxc frame. But tne eqlivalence betwcen these two dyfferent framex to thz linexr-order pegturbatiois is seldom discussed. Bevldes, for morx general higyer-oeder cufxature gravitayional thvoxies, confirmal transformatipn ojght not be conrtnitnr any more. In yhag cwsv, oie neqgs to confrott tfe aorect linearizatlon of yhe corresponding thaory. In Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017] we dlscussed jhe first direct lineatization of warped $f(R)$ dmmamn walk ig the quadratic action approacg. The predenb work reconsyderw the linearnzation of the same model of Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017] but follows a difderent approach,
that $h_{rr}$ can be eliminated by using equation. one finally get a complicated not listed here. Our shows that by a new variable $\mathcal{G} \equiv \theta with $$\begin{aligned} \theta\equiv \frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\prime}}}}{{\sqrt {3{f_R}} \left( {\frac{{a'}}{a} + \frac{{f_R^{\prime}}}{{3{f_R}}}} \right)}},\end{aligned}$$ the final equation be written as $$\begin{aligned} \label{scalarPert} \square^{(4)}\mathcal{G}+\mathcal{G}''-\frac{\theta''}{\theta}\mathcal{G}=0.\end{aligned}$$ This equation is nothing but the same obtained the action either in the Einstein frame or in the higher-order frame [@ZhongLiu2017]. In sum, the curvature gauge to equivalent scalar perturbation equation, no matter from quadratic action or the of motion approach. Using the of quantum mechanics, is to that any domain solution with $f_R>0$ is stable against linear perturbations (see Ref. for detail). Summary {#secSum} ======= This work an example to directly a gravitational in the equation approach. For simplicity, we only consider namely, a five-dimensional pure metric $f(R)$ gravity with geometry. In one usually introduces a conformal transformation rewrite the higher-order $f(R)$ theory into a second-order theory, and then conducts the linearization in the later frame. But the equivalence between these frames to the linear-order is seldom discussed. for general curvature theories, conformal might not be convenient any more. In that case, one needs confront the direct linearization of the corresponding theory. In Ref. discussed first direct linearization warped $f(R)$ domain wall the action approach. The present the of of [@ZhongLiu2017] follows a different approach,
 that $h_{rr}$ can be eliminated by uSing the conStraiNt eQuaTiOn. So, One fInally would get A CompLicated equation of $A$, whicH will NoT Be liSTeD here. our calcULaTIOn sHoWs ThaT bY DeFininG a nEw variaBle $\mathcal{g} \eqUiV \theta A$ with $$\bEGiN{aligned}
\thEta\Equiv \frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\PriMe}}}}{{\sqrt {3{F_R}} \LefT( {\Frac{{a'}}{A} + \frAc{{f_R^{\pRime}}}{{3{f_R}}}} \RIght)}},\enD{aligned}$$ tHe FInal eqUAtion caN BE wRittEn as $$\begin{aligned}
\lABeL{ScalarPert}
\squaRe^{(4)}\mathCaL{g}+\mATHcaL{G}''-\fRac{\theta''}{\thEtA}\mathCAl{G}=0.\end{aLIgNED}$$ thiS Equation is notHing but the sAMe oNe obtaInEd iN The quaDratiCaL ActIon apporach EithEr in the EiNstein FRame  or iN The highEr-ordeR frAme [@zhonGliU2017]. IN suM, tHE cuRVaTurE GauGe leads tO eQuIvaleNt scALAR PertUrbAtioN equaTion, no matter fRom The qUAdrAtic aCtion Or thE eQuatiOn of moTion aPpRoach. Using the thEory Of supersyMmeTrIc qUaNtum mEChanicS, it Is eAsy to shOw that aNY doMaIN WAlL solution with $f_R>0$ is sTaBLE aGainst liNear peRTuRbATions (see reF.  foR detAIL).

SummAry {#sECSUm}
=======

This woRk sets AN eXaMple on hOw To direCtLy lIneArize A HighEr-ordeR gravitaTionaL Theory in the equATion of motion aPPrOACh. fOr siMplIcity, we only ConsIDer a SimpLE mOdeL, NamelY, a fivE-dIMeNSional pure metric $f(R)$ gRaVity wiTh warPed geometry. In Literature, ONE Usually iNtroDUcES a conformal traNsforMation to reWRite the hIgher-Order $f(R)$ tHeory into A SEcond-ordEr EInsTeiN-scALAr Theory, and then CONducTs The lineAriZation iN thE laTer FraMe. but the equIvalence BeTwEeN tHesE two dIFferent fRaMes To The LineaR-Order pErturBatiOnS iS SelDom discUSsED. besiDeS, fOr moRe gEnEral hIgheR-OrdEr curvaTure graviTatIOnal ThEoRies, conFormal transfoRmAtion might NoT be ConvenIENt any morE. In that case, one needs to coNFront thE diRect lIneaRization oF thE correSpoNDing thEory. In ref. [@ZhOnGLiU2017] WE discUSSeD thE fIrst direct LINeaRizatIoN of wArped $f(R)$ Domain wall in the quaDRatIc action approAch. the pRESeNt wORk REcoNsIDerS THe linearization Of the same mOdEL oF Ref. [@ZhongLIU2017] buT fOllows a DiffereNt appROach,
 that $h_{rr}$ can be elim inated byusing  th e c on stra intequation. So,o ne f inally would get a com plica te d  equ a ti on of  $A$, w h ic h wil lno t b el is ted h ere . Our c alculation  sh ow s that by de f in ing a newvar iable $\math cal {G} \e qu iv\ theta  A$  with  $$\be g in{ali gned}
\th et a \equiv \frac{{ { a ^{ 3/2} }{f_R^{\prime}}}} { {\ s qrt {3{f_R}} \ left({\ f ra c { {a' }}{ a} + \frac {{ f_R^{ \ prime}} } {{ 3 { f _R} } }} \right)}}, \end{aligne d }$$  the f in ale quatio n can  b e  wr itten as $$ \beg in{aligne d}
\la b el{scal a rPert}\squar e^{ (4) }\ma t hc al {G} +\ m ath c al {G} ' '-\ frac{\th et a' '}{\t heta } \ m a thca l{G }=0. \end{ aligned}$$ Th isequa t ion  is n othin g bu tthe s ame on e obt ai ned in the quad rati cal actio n a pp ora ch  eith e r in t heEin stein f rame  o r  in  t h e hi gher-order frame [ @Z h o ng Liu2017] . In s u m,  t h e curvat ur e g auge l eadsto e q ui valent s calarp er tu rbation  e quatio n,  no  ma tterf romthe qu adraticactio n  or the equati o n of motion a p pr o a ch .  Usi ngthe theoryof s u pers ymme t ri c q u antum  mech an i cs ,  it is easy to show  t hat an y dom ain wall solu tion with$ f _ R>0$ isstab l ea gainst linearpertu rbations ( s ee Ref. fordetail). 

Summary { #secSum} 
== === ==
Th i s  w ork sets an e x a mple  o n how t o d irectly  li nea riz e a  h igher-ord er gravi ta ti on al  th eoryi n the eq ua tio nofmotio n  appro ach.Forsi mp l ici ty, weo nl y cons id er  a s imp le  mode l, n a mel y, a fi ve-dimens ion a l pu re  m etric $ f(R)$ gravity  w ith warped  g eom etry.I n  literat ure, one usually introd u ces a c onf ormal  tra nsformati onto rew rit e  the h igher- order  $ f(R ) $  theo r y  i nto  a  second-or d e r E inste in -sca lar the ory, and then cond u cts  the lineariz ati on i n th e l a te r  fr am e . B u t  the equivalenc e betweenth e se  two diffe r ent  f rames t o the l inear - order p erturbati ons is se ld om d i s cus sed. Besid es, formore gene r al hi g he r-ord ercurvat ur e g ravit ationa l  th eorie s, con fo rmal t ransf or mation m ight not be convenientany mo re. I n t hat case,  on e  ne eds to co nfro nt the dir ect  li neari zat i on of  the co rre s pondi ng t h eory. InR ef . [ @ Z ho ngLiu2017]w e dis cusse d t h e firs t di rect linearizatio n  of warped $f( R)$d o mai n w a ll i nthe quadraticact io n approach .The present  work re co n sider s thelinear ization o ft he sam e mo del  of Ref.[@Z ho n gLiu201 7]  b u t foll owsadiffer ent ap p roac h , 
 that_$h_{rr}$ can_be eliminated by using_the constraint_equation._So, one_finally_would get a_complicated equation of_$A$, which will not_be listed here._Our_calculation shows that by defining a new variable $\mathcal{G} \equiv \theta A$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\theta\equiv_\frac{{{a^{3/2}}{f_R^{\prime}}}}{{\sqrt_{3{f_R}} \left(_{\frac{{a'}}{a}_+_\frac{{f_R^{\prime}}}{{3{f_R}}}} \right)}},\end{aligned}$$ the final equation_can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{scalarPert}
\square^{(4)}\mathcal{G}+\mathcal{G}''-\frac{\theta''}{\theta}\mathcal{G}=0.\end{aligned}$$_This equation_is nothing but the same one obtained in_the_quadratical action apporach_either in the Einstein frame  or in the higher-order_frame [@ZhongLiu2017]. In sum, the curvature gauge_leads to equivalent_scalar_perturbation_equation, no matter from_the quadratic action or the equation_of motion approach. Using the theory_of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, it is easy_to show that any domain wall_solution with $f_R>0$ is stable_against linear_perturbations (see Ref.  for detail).

Summary_{#secSum}
=======

This work sets_an example_on how to_directly linearize a higher-order gravitational theory_in the equation_of motion approach. For simplicity, we_only_consider a simple_model,_namely,_a five-dimensional_pure metric $f(R)$_gravity_with warped_geometry._In literature, one usually introduces a_conformal_transformation to rewrite the higher-order $f(R)$ theory_into a second-order Einstein-scalar_theory,_and then conducts the_linearization in the later frame._But the equivalence between these two_different frames_to the_linear-order perturbations is seldom discussed. Besides, for more general higher-order curvature_gravitational theories, conformal transformation might not_be convenient any more._In that_case,_one needs to_confront_the direct_linearization of the corresponding theory. In Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017]_we discussed_the first direct linearization of warped_$f(R)$ domain wall in_the_quadratic action approach. The present work_reconsiders the linearization of the same_model of Ref. [@ZhongLiu2017] but follows_a_different_approach,