1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathcal{K}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1}\}\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$, where $o_p(1)$ includes penalty function. It follows from $B_{n}\theta_{1}=0$ and $B_nB_n^{{\!\top\!}}=I_d$ and Theorem 3 of Tang and Leng (2012) that the constrained PET estimators $\tilde{\lambda}$ and $\tilde{\theta}_1$ of $\lambda$ and $\theta_1$ under $H_0$ can be obtained by maximizing $\tilde{\ell}_p(\lambda,\theta_1,\tau) =\log n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\exp\{\lambda^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$; $\theta_1)\}-\sum_{j=1}^{q}p_{\gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\theta_1$. It is easily shown that $\tilde{\lambda}=(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+\tilde{R}_{1n}$, where $\mathbb{P}=\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}}(B_{n}\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\mathcal{K}-\mathcal{K}$. Thus, the constrained maximum PET likelihood is given by $2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$. Then, the constrained PET likelihood ratio statistic for testing $H_0:B_n\theta_{10}=0$ is given by $$\hat{\ell}(B_n)=2n\bar{\ell}_p(\hat{\theta}_1, \hat{\lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=n\bar
1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathcal{K}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1}\}\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$, where $ o_p(1)$ includes penalty function. It follows from $ B_{n}\theta_{1}=0 $ and $ B_nB_n^{{\!\top\!}}=I_d$ and Theorem 3 of Tang and Leng (2012) that the constrained PET calculator $ \tilde{\lambda}$ and $ \tilde{\theta}_1 $ of $ \lambda$ and $ \theta_1 $ under $ H_0 $ can be prevail by maximizing $ \tilde{\ell}_p(\lambda,\theta_1,\tau) = \log n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\exp\{\lambda^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$; $ \theta_1)\}-\sum_{j=1}^{q}p_{\gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\theta_1$. It is easily testify that $ \tilde{\lambda}=(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+\tilde{R}_{1n}$, where $ \mathbb{P}=\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}}(B_{n}\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\mathcal{K}-\mathcal{K}$. Thus, the stiffen maximum PET likelihood is given by $ 2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$. Then, the constrained PET likelihood proportion statistic for testing $ H_0: B_n\theta_{10}=0 $ is given by $ $ \hat{\ell}(B_n)=2n\bar{\ell}_p(\hat{\theta}_1, \hat{\lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=n\bar
1,\hat{\pambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamoa_1\mathcal{K}\Gamma_1^{{\!\jop\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Vigma_1^{-1}\}\bzr{\psi}+o_p(1)$, dhere $o_p(1)$ includes penalty fuictiin. It follows from $B_{n}\theta_{1}=0$ xnd $B_nB_n^{{\!\tlp\!}}=I_d$ and Theieem 3 of Taif and Lcug (2012) tgwt tke constrained PGT estimatorv $\tilde{\lambda}$ dna $\cilde{\theta}_1$ of $\lambda$ and $\theta_1$ under $H_0$ can ne obtained by mwximpzyng $\fplbe{\ell}_p(\lambda,\theta_1,\tau) =\log n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sxp\{\lambva^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$; $\thets_1)\}-\sum_{j=1}^{q}p_{\gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\hhetw_1$. It is easily shoan that $\tilee{\laivda}=(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gammx_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sjgma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+\tilde{R}_{1n}$, where $\mathbb{P}=\oathccl{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}}(B_{n}\mqtycap{N}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\nathcwl{K}-\mathcal{K}$. Bnus, tha consttained maximum PEV lijelihood is given by $2i\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tylde{\lambdd})=-n\yar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\marhvb{P}\Gakma_1^{{\!\tmp\!}}\Siena_1^{-1}-\Skgmz_1^{-1})\ber{\pai}+o_p(1)$. Tjen, the constdained PET oikelihood ratio ststywtic for testjng $H_0:B_g\treta_{10}=0$ is given by $$\hat{\ell}(B_n)=2n\bar{\ell}_p(\hat{\theua}_1, \haf{\lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\thera}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=n\bar
1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathcal{K}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1}\}\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$, where $o_p(1)$ includes penalty function. It $B_{n}\theta_{1}=0$ $B_nB_n^{{\!\top\!}}=I_d$ and 3 of Tang constrained estimators $\tilde{\lambda}$ and of $\lambda$ and under $H_0$ can be obtained by $\tilde{\ell}_p(\lambda,\theta_1,\tau) =\log n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\exp\{\lambda^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$; $\theta_1)\}-\sum_{j=1}^{q}p_{\gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\theta_1$. It is easily shown that $\tilde{\lambda}=(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+\tilde{R}_{1n}$, where $\mathbb{P}=\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}}(B_{n}\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\mathcal{K}-\mathcal{K}$. Thus, constrained maximum PET likelihood is given by $2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$. Then, the constrained PET ratio for $H_0:B_n\theta_{10}=0$ given by $$\hat{\ell}(B_n)=2n\bar{\ell}_p(\hat{\theta}_1, \hat{\lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=n\bar
1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\GAmma_1\mathcaL{K}\GamMa_1^{{\!\tOp\!}}\SIgMa_1^{-1}-\SiGma_1^{-1}\}\bAr{\psi}+o_p(1)$, where $o_p(1)$ INcluDes penalty function. It foLlows FrOM $B_{n}\tHEtA_{1}=0$ and $B_NB_n^{{\!\top\!}}=I_D$ AnD tHeoReM 3 oF TaNg ANd leng (2012) tHat The consTrained PET EstImAtors $\tilde{\laMBdA}$ and $\tilde{\tHetA}_1$ of $\lambda$ and $\TheTa_1$ undeR $H_0$ Can BE obtaIneD by maXimiziNG $\tilde{\Ell}_p(\lambdA,\tHEta_1,\tau) =\LOg n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\EXp\{\LambDa^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$; $\theta_1)\}-\suM_{J=1}^{q}P_{\Gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\Top\!}}B_{n}\tHeTA_1$. IT IS eaSilY shown that $\TiLde{\laMBda}=(\SigmA_1^{-1}\gaMMA_1\MatHBb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\SiGma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\PSi}+\tIlde{R}_{1n}$, WhEre $\MAthbb{P}=\MathcAl{k}b_{n}^{{\!\tOp\!}}(B_{n}\mathcal{k}B_{n}^{{\!\tOp\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\maThcal{K}-\MAthcal{K}$. tHus, the cOnstraIneD maXimuM pEt lIkeLiHOod IS gIveN By $2n\Bar{\ell}_p(\tIlDe{\Theta}_1, \TildE{\LAMBda})=-n\Bar{\Psi}^{{\!\tOp\!}}(\SigMa_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{p}\GaMma_1^{{\!\tOP\!}}\SiGma_1^{-1}-\SiGma_1^{-1})\baR{\psi}+O_p(1)$. then, tHe consTrainEd pET likelihood raTio sTatistic fOr tEsTinG $H_0:b_n\theTA_{10}=0$ is givEn bY $$\haT{\ell}(B_n)=2n\Bar{\ell}_p(\HAt{\tHeTA}_1, \HAt{\Lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tildE{\tHETa}_1, \Tilde{\lamBda})=n\baR
1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\p si}^{{\!\t op\!} }\{ \Si gm a_1^ {-1} \Gamma_1\mathc a l{K} \Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\ Sigma _1 ^ {-1} - \S igma_ 1^{-1}\ } \b a r {\p si }+ o_p (1 ) $,  wher e $ o_p(1)$  includespen al ty function. It  follows f rom  $B_{n}\thet a_{ 1}=0$an d $ B _nB_n ^{{ \!\to p\!}}= I _d$ an d Theorem  3 of Tan g  and Le n g  ( 2012 ) that the constr a in e d PET estimato rs $\t il d e{ \ l amb da} $ and $\ti ld e{\th e ta}_1$o f$ \ l amb d a$ and $\thet a_1$ under$ H_0 $ canbe  ob t ainedby ma xi m izi ng $\tilde{ \ell }_p(\lamb da,\th e ta_1,\t a u) =\lo g n^{- 1}\ sum _{i= 1 }^ {n }\e xp \ {\l a mb da^ { {\! \top\!}} \p si (Z_i$ ; $\ t h e t a_1) \}- \sum _{j=1 }^{q}p_{\gamm a}( |\th e ta_ {1j}| )+\ta u^{{ \! \top\ !}}B_{ n}\th et a_1$. It is eas ilyshown tha t $ \t ild e{ \lamb d a}=(\S igm a_1 ^{-1}\G amma_1\ m ath bb { P } \G amma_1^{{\!\top\!} }\ S i gm a_1^{-1} -\Sigm a _1 ^{ - 1})\bar{ \p si} +\ti l d e{R}_ {1n} $ ,where $\ mathbb { P} =\ mathcal {K }B_{n} ^{ {\! \to p\!}} ( B_{n }\math cal{K}B_ {n}^{ { \!\top\!}})^{{ \ !\top\!}}B_{n } \m a t hc a l{K} -\m athcal{K}$.  Thu s , th e co n st rai n ed ma ximum  P E Tl ikelihood is givenby  $2n\b ar{\e ll}_p(\tilde{ \theta}_1, \ t ilde{\la mbda } )= - n\bar{\psi}^{{ \!\to p\!}}(\Sig m a_1^{-1} \Gamm a_1\math bb{P}\Gam m a _1^{{\!\ top \!} }\S igm a _ 1^ {-1}-\Sigma_1 ^ { -1}) \b ar{\psi }+o _p(1)$.  Th en,  th e c on strainedPET like li ho od  r ati o sta t istic fo rtes ti ng$H_0: B _n\the ta_{1 0}=0 $is giv en by $ $ \h a t {\el l} (B _n)= 2n\ ba r{\el l}_p ( \ha t{\thet a}_1, \ha t{\ l ambd a} )- 2n\bar{ \ell}_p(\tild e{ \theta}_1,  \ til de{\la m b da})=n\b ar
1,\hat{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}\{\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathcal{K}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1}\}\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$, where_$o_p(1)$ includes_penalty function. It follows_from $B_{n}\theta_{1}=0$_and_$B_nB_n^{{\!\top\!}}=I_d$ and_Theorem_3 of Tang_and Leng (2012)_that the constrained PET_estimators $\tilde{\lambda}$ and_$\tilde{\theta}_1$_of $\lambda$ and $\theta_1$ under $H_0$ can be obtained by maximizing $\tilde{\ell}_p(\lambda,\theta_1,\tau) =\log n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\exp\{\lambda^{{\!\top\!}}\psi(Z_i$;_$\theta_1)\}-\sum_{j=1}^{q}p_{\gamma}(|\theta_{1j}|)+\tau^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\theta_1$._It is_easily_shown_that $\tilde{\lambda}=(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+\tilde{R}_{1n}$, where $\mathbb{P}=\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}}(B_{n}\mathcal{K}B_{n}^{{\!\top\!}})^{{\!\top\!}}B_{n}\mathcal{K}-\mathcal{K}$. Thus,_the constrained maximum PET likelihood_is given_by $2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=-n\bar{\psi}^{{\!\top\!}}(\Sigma_1^{-1}\Gamma_1\mathbb{P}\Gamma_1^{{\!\top\!}}\Sigma_1^{-1}-\Sigma_1^{-1})\bar{\psi}+o_p(1)$. Then, the constrained PET likelihood_ratio_statistic for testing_$H_0:B_n\theta_{10}=0$ is given by $$\hat{\ell}(B_n)=2n\bar{\ell}_p(\hat{\theta}_1, \hat{\lambda})-2n\bar{\ell}_p(\tilde{\theta}_1, \tilde{\lambda})=n\bar