 TeV gives access to the $e^+e^- \to H^0A^0$ process. As a result of the precision of these measurements, the ILC data at 0.5 TeV will allow to predict the neutralino relic density to $\pm$2 % and the addition of 1.0 TeV data will improve it to $\pm$0.25 %. It is suggestive that this accuracy is comparable, or better, than that expected by the improved CMB survey by the PLANCK mission. For comparison, the LHC data should provide a $\pm$7 % accuracy. This already a remarkable result, due the fact that, a large number of measurements will be available at the LHC and SUSY decay chains can be reconstructed. Still, the overall mass scale remains uncertain at the LHC. The direct mass measurements on the ILC data remove this uncertainty.

The LCC1 point is characterised by the relatively low SUSY mass scale, most of the particles can be observed at the LHC and their masses accurately measured at the ILC. However, in more general scenarios, the information available from both collider will be more limited. This is the case at the LCC2 point, located in the focus point region, where masses of scalar quarks, sleptons and heavy Higgs bosons are very large, typically beyond the ILC but also the LHC reach, while gauginos masses are of the order of few hundreds GeV, thus within the kinematical domain of the ILC. In this specific scenario, the LHC will observe the SUSY process $\tilde g \to q \bar q \chi$ and the subsequent neutralino and chargino decays. Still the neutralino relic density can only be constrained within $\pm$40% and the hypothesis $\Omega_{\chi} h^2$ = 0, namely that the neutralino does not contribute to the observed dark matter density in the universe, cannot be ruled out, based only on LHC data. At a 0.5 TeV collider, the main SUSY reactions are $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_1 \chi^-_1$ and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_2 \chi^0_3$. Operation at 1 TeV gives access also to $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_2 \chi^-_2$ and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_3 \chi^0_4$. Not only the gaug
TeV gives access to the $ e^+e^- \to H^0A^0 $ process. As a result of the preciseness of these measurement, the ILC datum at 0.5   TeV will allow to predict the neutralino relic concentration to $ \pm$2  % and the addition of 1.0   TeV data will improve it to $ \pm$0.25  % . It is implicative that this accuracy is comparable, or better, than that expected by the improved CMB sketch by the PLANCK mission. For comparison, the LHC data should leave a $ \pm$7  % accuracy. This already a remarkable result, ascribable the fact that, a large number of measurement will be available at the LHC and SUSY decay chains can be rebuild. Still, the overall mass scale remains changeable at the LHC. The direct mass measurements on the ILC data get rid of this uncertainty. 

 The LCC1 point is characterised by the relatively low SUSY mass plate, most of the particles can be observed at the LHC and their masses accurately measured at the ILC. However, in more general scenarios, the data available from both collider will be more circumscribed. This is the casing at the LCC2 point, located in the focus point region, where masses of scalar quarks, sleptons and heavy Higgs boson are very bombastic, typically beyond the ILC but also the LHC strive, while gauginos masses are of the order of few hundreds GeV, thus within the kinematical knowledge domain of the ILC. In this specific scenario, the LHC will observe the SUSY process $ \tilde g \to q \bar q \chi$ and the subsequent neutralino and chargino decays. Still the neutralino keepsake density can only be constrained within $ \pm$40% and the hypothesis $ \Omega_{\chi } h^2 $ = 0, namely that the neutralino does not contribute to the observed dark matter density in the universe, cannot be ruled out, based merely on LHC data. At a 0.5   TeV collider, the chief SUSY reactions are $ e^+e^- \to \chi^+_1 \chi^-_1 $ and $ e^+e^- \to \chi^0_2 \chi^0_3$. Operation at 1   TeV gives access also to $ e^+e^- \to \chi^+_2 \chi^-_2 $ and $ e^+e^- \to \chi^0_3 \chi^0_4$. Not only the gaug
 TeV gives access to the $e^+e^- \uo H^0A^0$ process. As c resulv of ths preciskon of these measurements, thx ILX datq at 0.5 TeV will allow to predict nhe neutrqlini relic density to $\ii$2 % ans the eddition of 1.0 TeV data will improve it to $\po$0.25 %. Nt is suggestive that this accuracy ys compsrwble, or better, tham thaf expected by the improved CMB surbey by uhe PLANCK mission. For comparison, the LHC daha sjould provide a $\pm$7 % accuracy. Tyis woready a remxrkable result, due the fact that, a large number of mexsurekents will bw agdilable at vhe LHB and SUSY degsy chahns can be reconstrucbed. Svill, the overall mass scane remains uncertayn at the LKC. The direct mass meqsyremetts mn tfw IUC sava demove thms uncertaihty.

The LCC1 point is characterixeq by the relatjvely jor SUSY mass scale, most of the particles cah be observed at the LHX and their masses acfurately ieasured at the ILC. However, in more general scenasios, vhd iunjfnahion available from both collider will be morq lompted. This is the gase at the LCC2 poonh, kjcated in the focus pojnt region, where mwsses os scaoar quarkf, slrptons and heavy Higgs bosobs are very jqrge, typically beylnd the ILC but also the LHC reach, while gabginos masses are of the odaer of few hundrdds GaV, thus within the kinematycal domamn of the ILZ. In this fpecific sfenarlm, the LHC will obsfrve jhe SUVY process $\tilde g \to q \bar q \chi$ and the subsequent neotrdlito and ckarginp decays. Stilj the neutraliuo relic denskty can onmy be cmnstrained rithin $\pm$40% and jhe hypothesiv $\Omega_{\cri} h^2$ = 0, nqmely tfxt the neutralono does ujt cintribute to the onservgd dark matter deuruty in the univrrsd, cwnjov be wgled out, basad ovly pn LHZ data. At a 0.5 GeV vollider, the main SUVY rsactions are $e^+e^- \to \cmi^+_1 \chi^-_1$ ane $e^+e^- \to \shi^0_2 \chi^0_3$. Operayion at 1 TeV gives wccesv auso tp $e^+g^- \to \chi^+_2 \chi^-_2$ and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_3 \chi^0_4$. Hot only hhe gaug
TeV gives access to the $e^+e^- \to As result of precision of these 0.5 will allow to the neutralino relic to $\pm$2 % and the addition 1.0 TeV data will improve it to $\pm$0.25 %. It is suggestive that accuracy is comparable, or better, than that expected by the improved CMB survey the mission. comparison, LHC data should provide a $\pm$7 % accuracy. This already a remarkable result, due the fact a large number of measurements will be available the LHC and SUSY chains can be reconstructed. Still, overall scale remains at LHC. direct mass measurements the ILC data remove this uncertainty. The LCC1 point is characterised by the relatively low SUSY mass most of can be at LHC their masses accurately the ILC. However, in more general available from both collider will be more limited. is the at the LCC2 point, located in focus point region, where masses of scalar quarks, and heavy Higgs bosons are very large, typically beyond the ILC but also the LHC gauginos masses are of order of few GeV, within kinematical of the In this specific scenario, the LHC will observe the SUSY process g \to q \bar q \chi$ and the subsequent neutralino decays. the neutralino relic can only be constrained $\pm$40% the hypothesis $\Omega_{\chi} h^2$ namely the contribute the dark matter density in universe, cannot be ruled out, only on LHC data. the main SUSY reactions are $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_1 and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_2 \chi^0_3$. Operation at TeV gives access also to $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_2 \chi^-_2$ and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_4$. Not gaug
 TeV gives access to the $e^+e^- \to H^0A^0$ Process. As a ResulT of The PrEcisIon oF these measuremENts, tHe ILC data at 0.5 TeV will alloW to prEdICt thE NeUtralIno reliC DeNSIty To $\Pm$2 % And ThE AdDitioN of 1.0 teV data Will improvE it To $\Pm$0.25 %. It is suggesTIvE that this aCcuRacy is comparAblE, or betTeR, thAN that ExpEcted By the iMProved cMB survey By THe PLANck missioN. fOr CompArison, the LHC data sHOuLD provide a $\pm$7 % accUracy. THiS AlREAdy A reMarkable reSuLt, due THe fact tHAt, A LARge NUmber of measurEments will bE AvaIlable At The lhC and SuSY deCaY ChaIns can be recOnstRucted. StiLl, the oVErall maSS scale rEmains UncErtAin aT ThE LhC. THe DIreCT mAss MEasUrements On ThE ILC dAta rEMOVE thiS unCertAinty.

the LCC1 point is ChaRactERisEd by tHe relAtivElY low SuSY masS scalE, mOst of the particlEs caN be observEd aT tHe LhC And thEIr massEs aCcuRately mEasured AT thE Ilc. hOwEver, in more general sCeNARiOs, the infOrmatiON aVaILable froM bOth CollIDEr wilL be mORe Limited. THis is tHE cAsE at the LcC2 Point, lOcAteD in The foCUs poInt regIon, where MasseS Of scalar quarks, SLeptons and heaVY HIGGs BOsonS arE very large, tYpicALly bEyonD ThE ILc But alSo the lHc ReACh, while gauginos massEs Are of tHe ordEr of few hundreDs GeV, thus wITHIn the kinEmatICaL Domain of the ILC. in thiS specific sCEnario, thE LHC wIll obserVe the SUSY PROcess $\tilDe g \To q \Bar Q \chI$ ANd The subsequent NEUtraLiNo and chArgIno decaYs. STilL thE neUtRalino relIc densitY cAn OnLy Be cOnstrAIned withIn $\Pm$40% aNd The HypotHEsis $\OmEga_{\chI} h^2$ = 0, naMeLy THat The neutRAlINO doeS nOt ContRibUtE to thE obsERveD dark maTter densiTy iN The uNiVeRse, cannOt be ruled out, bAsEd only on LHc dAta. at a 0.5 TeV COLlider, thE main SUSY reactions are $e^+e^- \TO \chi^+_1 \chi^-_1$ And $E^+e^- \to \cHi^0_2 \chI^0_3$. OperatioN at 1 teV givEs aCCess alSo to $e^+e^- \To \chi^+_2 \ChI^-_2$ anD $E^+E^- \to \chI^0_3 \CHi^0_4$. not OnLy the gaug
 TeV gives access to the $ e^+e^- \to  H^0A ^0$  pr oc ess.  Asa result of th e  pre cision of these measur ement s, theI LC  data  at 0.5 Te V wil lal low  t o  p redic t t he neut ralino rel icde nsity to $\p m $2  % and the  ad dition of 1. 0 T eV dat awil l  impr ove  it t o $\pm $ 0.25 % . It is s ug g estive that th i s  a ccur acy is comparable ,  o r  better, thanthat e xp e ct e d  by  th e improved  C MB su r vey byt he P L ANC K  mission. For  comparison ,  th e LHCda tas houldprovi de a $ \pm$7 % acc urac y. This a lready a remar k able re sult,due  th e fa c tth at,  a lar g enum b erof measu re me nts w illb e a vail abl e at  theLHC and SUSYdec ay c h ain s can  be r econ st ructe d. Sti ll, t he  overall mass s cale  remainsunc er tai nat th e  LHC.The  di rect ma ss meas u rem en t s on  the ILC data remo ve t hi s uncert ainty. 
T he LCC1 poi nt  is  cha r a cteri sedb ythe rela tively lo wSUSY ma ss  scale ,mos t o f the part iclescan be o bserv e d at the LHC a n d their masse s  a c c ur a tely  me asured at t he I L C. H owev e r,  in moregener al sc e narios, the informa ti on ava ilabl e from both c ollider wi l l be morelimi t ed .  This is the c ase a t the LCC2 point, l ocate d in the  focus po i n t region , w her e m ass e s  o f scalar quar k s , sl ep tons an d h eavy Hi ggs  bo son s a re  very lar ge, typi ca ll ybe yon d the ILC butal soth e L HC re a ch, wh ile g augi no sm ass es areo ft h e or de rof f ewhu ndred s Ge V , t hus wit hin the k ine m atic al  d omain o f the ILC. In  t his specif ic  sc enario , the LHCwill observe the SUSY p r ocess $ \ti lde g  \to  q \bar q  \c hi$ an d t h e subs equent  neut ra lin o and c h a rg ino  d ecays. Sti l l  th e neu tr alin o relic  density can onlyb e c onstrained wi thi n $\ p m $4 0%a nd the  h y pot h e sis $\Omega_{\c hi} h^2$ =  0 ,  n amely that the  n eutrali no does  notc ontribu te to the  observed  d arkm a tte r densityin the u niverse,c annot be  rule d o ut, ba se d o nly o n LHCd ata . Ata 0.5Te V coll ider,  t he mainSUSY reactions are $e^+ e^- \t o \ch i^+ _1 \chi^- _1$ and  $e^+e^-\to\chi^0_2 \ chi ^0_ 3$. O per a tionat 1 Te V g i ves a cces s  also to$ e^ +e^ - \t o \chi^+_2\ c h i^- _2$ a nd$ e^+e^-  \to  \chi^0_3 \chi^0_ 4 $. Not only th e ga u g 
 TeV gives_access to_the $e^+e^- \to H^0A^0$_process. As_a_result of_the_precision of these_measurements, the ILC_data at 0.5 TeV will_allow to predict_the_neutralino relic density to $\pm$2 % and the addition of 1.0 TeV data will improve it_to_$\pm$0.25 %. It_is_suggestive_that this accuracy is comparable,_or better, than that expected_by the_improved CMB survey by the PLANCK mission. For_comparison,_the LHC data_should provide a $\pm$7 % accuracy. This already a remarkable_result, due the fact that, a_large number of_measurements_will_be available at the_LHC and SUSY decay chains can_be reconstructed. Still, the overall mass_scale remains uncertain at the LHC. The_direct mass measurements on the ILC_data remove this uncertainty.

The LCC1_point is_characterised by the relatively low_SUSY mass scale,_most of_the particles can_be observed at the LHC and_their masses accurately_measured at the ILC. However, in_more_general scenarios, the_information_available_from both_collider will be_more_limited. This_is_the case at the LCC2 point,_located_in the focus point region, where masses_of scalar quarks, sleptons_and_heavy Higgs bosons are_very large, typically beyond the_ILC but also the LHC reach,_while gauginos_masses are_of the order of few hundreds GeV, thus within the kinematical_domain of the ILC. In this_specific scenario, the LHC_will observe_the_SUSY process $\tilde_g_\to q_\bar q \chi$ and the subsequent neutralino_and chargino_decays. Still the neutralino relic density_can only be constrained_within_$\pm$40% and the hypothesis $\Omega_{\chi} h^2$_= 0, namely that the neutralino_does not contribute to the_observed_dark_matter density in the universe,_cannot be ruled out, based only_on LHC data._At a 0.5 TeV collider, the main SUSY_reactions_are $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_1 \chi^-_1$ and_$e^+e^-_\to \chi^0_2 \chi^0_3$. Operation at 1 TeV_gives_access_also to $e^+e^- \to \chi^+_2_\chi^-_2$ and $e^+e^- \to \chi^0_3 \chi^0_4$._Not only the gaug