.5 K while **2** has a narrower peak centered at 6.5 K. **Zn-1** does not exhibit a magnetic transition or any other magnetic feature down to *T* = 2.5 K, consistent with a QSL ground state, and its HC and that of **Zn-2** is a topic of ongoing research and will be discussed further in future work. The small displacement between the curves above 20 K can be ascribed to the uncertainty in the mass normalization. For both barlowite samples, the background was fit to a third-degree polynomial *C$_{bg}$ = aT$^2$ + bT$^3$* between *T* = 18–25 K, following a previous analysis.[@Han2014] One expects the cubic term (*bT$^3$*) to derive from crystal lattice contribution; however, an additional quadratic term (*aT$^2$*) improved the fit in this range significantly (which is likely related to an intrinsic contribution from the kagomé spins). Since we aim to examine the anomalies in the HC related to the magnetic transitions of **1** and **2** and directly compare them to that reported by Han et al.,[@Han2014] we treat this empirical polynomial fit as a background in this discussion.

![Heat capacity (HC) measurements on **1** and **Zn-1** (pressed powder mixed with Ag) and **2** (single crystal). A) Molar HC; the dashed lines indicate *C$_{bg}$* for each sample. B) *C$_{mag}$* calculated by subtracting the background from the molar HC. C) Magnetic entropy normalized as a fraction of the total value per Cu.[]{data-label="fgr:HC"}](Fig4.png)

*C$_{bg}$* was subtracted from *C* to obtain the HC related to the magnetic transition (*C$_{mag}$*, Figure \[fgr:HC\]B); *C$_{mag}$*/T was integrated from 2.5–25 K to determine the entropy released by this transition (S, Figure \[fgr:HC\]C). The *C$_{mag}$* of **1** has a sharp onset and a plateau between 7–14 K. While the onset temperature for **1** ($\sim$15 K) is the same as that reported by Han et al.[@Han2014] for barlowite synthesized using similar precursors to our Method 1a, **1** has a much broader and flatter plateau
.5 K while * * 2 * * has a narrower peak centered at 6.5 K. * * Zn-1 * * does not parade a charismatic transition or any other charismatic feature down to * triiodothyronine * = 2.5 K, consistent with a QSL footing country, and its HC and that of * * Zn-2 * * is a topic of ongoing research and will be discussed further in future oeuvre. The small displacement between the curve above 20 K can be ascribed to the uncertainty in the mass normalization. For both barlowite samples, the setting was fit to a third - degree polynomial * C$ _ { bg}$ = aT$^2 $ + bT$^3 $ * between * T * = 18–25 K, be a previous analysis.[@Han2014 ] One expects the cubic term (* bT$^3 $ *) to derive from crystal wicket contribution; however, an additional quadratic terminus (* aT$^2 $ *) improved the fit in this range importantly (which is likely related to an intrinsic contribution from the kagomé spins). Since we aim to examine the anomalies in the HC relate to the charismatic transitions of * * 1 * * and * * 2 * * and directly compare them to that reported by Han et al. ,[@Han2014 ] we treat this empirical polynomial fit as a background in this discussion. 

! [ heating system capability (HC) measurements on * * 1 * * and * * Zn-1 * * (pressed powder mix with Ag) and * * 2 * * (individual crystal). A) Molar HC; the dashed lines indicate * C$ _ { bg}$ * for each sample. B) * C$ _ { mag}$ * calculated by subtract the background from the molar HC. C) Magnetic entropy normalized as a fraction of the total value per Cu.[]{data - label="fgr: HC"}](Fig4.png) 

 * C$ _ { bg}$ * was subtract from * C * to obtain the HC related to the magnetic passage (* C$ _ { mag}$ *, Figure \[fgr: HC\]B); * C$ _ { mag}$*/T was integrated from 2.5–25 K to specify the entropy released by this transition (S, Figure \[fgr: HC\]C). The * C$ _ { mag}$ * of * * 1 * * has a sharp attack and a plateau between 7–14 K. While the onset temperature for * * 1 * * ($ \sim$15 K) is the same as that reported by Han et al.[@Han2014 ] for barlowite synthesized using similar precursors to our Method 1a, * * 1 * * has a a lot broader and flatter plateau
.5 K ahile **2** has a narrower pexk centered at 6.5 K. **Zn-1** dmes nof exhibig a magnetic transition or aiy orher nagnetic feature down go *T* = 2.5 K, bonsistenr wiuh a QSL ground svzte, and its HD and vhat of **Zn-2** is a topic of mngoing researwh aud will be discussed further in futuwe work. Tje small displwcemtnt betsvek the curves above 20 K can be ascdibed tm the uncertaonty in the mass normalizahion. For both barlowitf samples, tye bwxkground was fit to a uhnrd-degree pklynomial *C$_{bg}$ = aT$^2$ + bT$^3$* between *T* = 18–25 K, yollowing a peevlmus analysiw.[@Han2014] Jne expects bne cubhc term (*bT$^3$*) to derive nrom rrysral lattice contributmon; however, an addityonal quagrctic term (*aT$^2$*) improved tye fij in dhis eanee aijniricantpy (xhich is liiely relatee to an intrinsic cpnegobution from the kwgjmé spins). Since we aim to examine the anmmamies in the HC related ro the magnetic transltions of **1** and **2** and directly compare them to that reported by Hen et aj.,[@Fqn2014] we treat this empirical polynomial fit as a fzclggound in this disgussion.

![Heat capaciyy (HV) measurements on **1** aus **An-1** (pressed powder lixed wyth At) and **2** (siggle crystal). A) Molar HC; the dasyed lines inbicqte *C$_{bg}$* for each scmple. B) *C$_{mag}$* calvulatrd by subtracting the bcckgrohnd from thf molar HD. C) Magnetic entrupy nmrmalized as a fraction of the totao vakue per Cu.[]{dsta-labql="fgr:HC"}](Fig4.ong)

*C$_{bn}$* was subtracted frlm *C* jo obtdin the HC related to the magnetic transivmon (*C$_{mag}$*, Figute \[xgr:VC\]B); *C$_{mag}$*/C was lntegrated from 2.5–25 K to determiue the eutropy released gy this transition (S, Figure \[fgr:VF\]C). The *C$_{mag}$* mf **1** has w shqrp inset ava a plateau beyween 7–14 K. Ckile the inset temperature nor **1** ($\rjm$15 K) is the samz qs that reportec bh Hwn ev al.[@Hwt2014] for barlowhte ryngnesizdd using sinklar precursors to our Mathos 1a, **1** has a much brpaqer and dlatter [lateau
.5 K while **2** has a narrower at K. **Zn-1** not exhibit a magnetic down to *T* 2.5 K, consistent a QSL ground state, and its and that of **Zn-2** is a topic of ongoing research and will be further in future work. The small displacement between the curves above 20 K be to uncertainty the mass normalization. For both barlowite samples, the background was fit to a third-degree polynomial *C$_{bg}$ aT$^2$ + bT$^3$* between *T* = 18–25 K, a previous analysis.[@Han2014] One the cubic term (*bT$^3$*) to from lattice contribution; an quadratic (*aT$^2$*) improved the in this range significantly (which is likely related to an intrinsic contribution from the kagomé spins). Since aim to anomalies in HC to magnetic transitions of **2** and directly compare them to Han et al.,[@Han2014] we treat this empirical polynomial as a in this discussion. ![Heat capacity (HC) on **1** and **Zn-1** (pressed powder mixed with and **2** (single crystal). A) Molar HC; the dashed lines indicate *C$_{bg}$* for each sample. calculated by subtracting the from the molar C) entropy as fraction of total value per Cu.[]{data-label="fgr:HC"}](Fig4.png) *C$_{bg}$* was subtracted from *C* to obtain HC related to the magnetic transition (*C$_{mag}$*, Figure \[fgr:HC\]B); *C$_{mag}$*/T from K to determine entropy released by this (S, \[fgr:HC\]C). The *C$_{mag}$* of a onset between K. the onset temperature for ($\sim$15 K) is the same that reported by Han using similar precursors to our Method 1a, **1** a much broader and flatter plateau
.5 K while **2** has a narrower peak cenTered at 6.5 K. **Zn-1** Does nOt eXhiBiT a maGnetIc transition or ANy otHer magnetic feature down To *T* = 2.5 K, cOnSIsteNT wIth a QsL grounD StATE, anD iTs hC aNd THaT of **Zn-2** Is a Topic of Ongoing resEarCh And will be disCUsSed further In fUture work. The SmaLl dispLaCemENt betWeeN the cUrves aBOve 20 K caN be ascribEd TO the unCErtaintY IN tHe maSs normalization. FoR BoTH barlowite sampLes, the BaCKgROUnd Was Fit to a thirD-dEgree POlynomiAL *C$_{BG}$ = At$^2$ + bT$^3$* BEtween *T* = 18–25 K, folloWing a previoUS anAlysis.[@haN2014] OnE ExpectS the cUbIC teRm (*bT$^3$*) to derivE froM crystal lAttice COntribuTIon; howeVer, an aDdiTioNal qUAdRaTic TeRM (*aT$^2$*) IMpRovED thE fit in thIs RaNge siGnifICANTly (wHicH is lIkely Related to an inTriNsic COntRibutIon frOm thE kAgomé Spins). SInce wE aIm to examine the aNomaLies in the hC rElAteD tO the mAGnetic TraNsiTions of **1** And **2** and dIRecTlY COMpAre them to that reporTeD BY HAn et al.,[@HaN2014] we treAT tHiS EmpiricaL pOlyNomiAL Fit as A bacKGrOund in thIs discUSsIoN.

![Heat caPaCity (HC) MeAsuRemEnts oN **1** And **ZN-1** (pressEd powder Mixed WIth Ag) and **2** (single CRystal). A) Molar Hc; ThE DAsHEd liNes Indicate *C$_{bg}$* For eACh saMple. b) *c$_{mAg}$* cALculaTed by SuBTrACting the background fRoM the moLar HC. c) Magnetic entrOpy normaliZED As a fractIon oF ThE Total value per CU.[]{data-Label="fgr:HC"}](fIg4.png)

*C$_{bg}$* Was suBtracted From *C* to obTAIn the HC rElaTed To tHe mAGNeTic transition (*c$_{MAg}$*, FiGuRe \[fgr:HC\]b); *C$_{mAg}$*/T was iNteGraTed FroM 2.5–25 K To determiNe the entRoPy ReLeAseD by thIS transitIoN (S, FIgUre \[Fgr:HC\]c). the *C$_{maG}$* of **1** haS a shArP oNSet And a plaTEaU BEtweEn 7–14 k. WHile The OnSet teMperATurE for **1** ($\sim$15 k) is the samE as THat rEpOrTed by HaN et al.[@Han2014] for baRlOwite synthEsIzeD using SIMilar preCursors to our Method 1a, **1** has a MUch broaDer And flAtteR plateau
.5 K while **2** has a nar rower peak  cent ere d a t6.5K. * *Zn-1** does n o t ex hibit a magnetic trans ition  o r  any ot her m agnetic fe a t ure  d ow n t o* T*  = 2. 5 K , consi stent with  aQS L ground sta t e,  and its H C a nd that of * *Zn -2** i sa t o pic o f o ngoin g rese a rch an d will be  d i scusse d  furthe r in  fut ure work. The sma l ld isplacement be tweenth e  c u r ves  ab ove 20 K c an  be a s cribedt ot h e  un c ertainty in t he mass nor m ali zation .For both b arlow it e  sa mples, theback ground wa s fitt o a thi r d-degre e poly nom ial  *C$ _ {b g} $ =  a T $^2 $  +  bT $ ^3$ * betwee n*T * = 1 8–25 K , foll owi ng a  prev ious analysis .[@ Han2 0 14]  Oneexpec ts t he  cubi c term  (*bT $^ 3$*) to derivefrom  crystallat ti ceco ntrib u tion;how eve r, an a ddition a l q ua d r a ti c term (*aT$^2$*)im p r ov ed the f it int hi sr ange sig ni fic antl y (whic h is li kely rel ated t o  a nintrins ic  contr ib uti onfromt he k agoméspins).Since we aim to exam i ne the anomal i es i nt he H C r elated to t he m a gnet ic t r an sit i ons o f **1 ** an d  **2** and directly  c ompare  them  to that repo rted by Ha n e t al.,[@ Han2 0 14 ]  we treat this  empi rical poly n omial fi t asa backgr ound in t h i s discus sio n.
![ Hea t ca pacity (HC) m e a sure me nts on**1 ** and**Z n-1 **(pr es sed powde r mixedwi th  A g)  an d **2 * * (singl ecry st al) . A)M olar H C; th e da sh ed lin es indi c at e *C$_ {b g} $* f orea ch sa mple .  B)  *C$_{m ag}$* cal cul a tedby  s ubtract ing the backg ro und from t he  mo lar HC . C) Magne tic entropy normalizeda s a fra cti on of  the  total va lue  per C u.[ ] {data- label= "fgr: HC "}] ( F ig4.p n g )
*C $_ {bg}$* was s ubt racte dfrom  *C* to  obtain the HC rel a ted  to the magne tic  tra n s it ion (* C $_{ ma g }$* , Figure \[fgr:HC \]B); *C$_ {m a g} $*/T was i n teg ra ted fro m 2.5–2 5 K t o  determ ine the e ntropy re le ased b y t his transi tion (S,  Figure \ [ fgr:H C \] C). T he*C$_{m ag }$*  of * *1** h a s a  shar p onse tand aplate au  between  7–14 K. While the onse t temp eratu refor **1**  ($ \ sim $15 K) is  the  same as t hat  re porte d b y  Hanet a l .[ @Ha n 2014]  for barlowite sy nth e s iz ed using si m i l arprecu rso r s to o ur M ethod 1a, **1** h a s a much broad er a n d  fl att e r pl at eau
.5 K_while **2**_has a narrower peak_centered at_6.5_K. **Zn-1**_does_not exhibit a_magnetic transition or_any other magnetic feature_down to *T*_=_2.5 K, consistent with a QSL ground state, and its HC and that of_**Zn-2**_is a_topic_of_ongoing research and will be_discussed further in future work._The small_displacement between the curves above 20 K can_be_ascribed to the_uncertainty in the mass normalization. For both barlowite samples,_the background was fit to a_third-degree polynomial *C$_{bg}$_=_aT$^2$_+ bT$^3$* between *T*_= 18–25 K, following a previous_analysis.[@Han2014] One expects the cubic term_(*bT$^3$*) to derive from crystal lattice contribution;_however, an additional quadratic term (*aT$^2$*)_improved the fit in this_range significantly_(which is likely related to_an intrinsic contribution_from the_kagomé spins). Since_we aim to examine the anomalies_in the HC_related to the magnetic transitions of_**1**_and **2** and_directly_compare_them to_that reported by_Han_et al.,[@Han2014]_we_treat this empirical polynomial fit as_a_background in this discussion.

![Heat capacity (HC) measurements_on **1** and **Zn-1**_(pressed_powder mixed with Ag)_and **2** (single crystal). A)_Molar HC; the dashed lines indicate_*C$_{bg}$* for_each sample._B) *C$_{mag}$* calculated by subtracting the background from the molar HC._C) Magnetic entropy normalized as a_fraction of the total_value per_Cu.[]{data-label="fgr:HC"}](Fig4.png)

*C$_{bg}$*_was subtracted from_*C*_to obtain_the HC related to the magnetic transition_(*C$_{mag}$*, Figure_\[fgr:HC\]B); *C$_{mag}$*/T was integrated from 2.5–25_K to determine the_entropy_released by this transition (S, Figure_\[fgr:HC\]C). The *C$_{mag}$* of **1** has_a sharp onset and a_plateau_between_7–14 K. While the onset_temperature for **1** ($\sim$15 K) is_the same as_that reported by Han et al.[@Han2014] for_barlowite_synthesized using similar precursors to our_Method_1a, **1** has a much broader_and_flatter_plateau