 $-0.523 \pm 0.039$\
$BC_{\rm V}$ (mag)& $-0.02 \pm 0.10$& $-0.30 \pm 0.11$\
$M_{\rm bol}$ (mag)& $3.192 \pm 0.098$ & $6.041 \pm 0.097$\
$M_V$ (mag)& $3.17 \pm 0.14$ & $6.34 \pm 0.17$\
$m-M$ (mag)&\
Distance (pc)&\
Parallax (mas)&\
$v_{\rm sync} \sin i$ ()& $28.4 \pm 0.2$& $13.9 \pm 0.2$\
$v \sin i$ ()& $26 \pm 2$& $12 \pm 2$

Comparison with stellar evolution models {#sec:models}
========================================

The accurate properties for  are compared with predictions from current stellar evolution theory in Figure \[fig:mistlogg\]. The evolutionary tracks for the measured masses of the components were taken from the grid of MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks [MIST; @Choi:2016], which is based on the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics package [MESA; @Paxton:2011; @Paxton:2013; @Paxton:2015]. The metallicity in the models was adjusted to ${\rm [Fe/H]} = -0.17$ to provide the best fit to the temperatures of the stars. This composition is not far from the photometric estimate reported earlier. The shaded areas in the figure indicate the uncertainty in the location of the tracks that comes from the errors in the measured masses. Solar-metallicity tracks are shown with dotted lines for reference. The age that best matches the radius of the primary is 2.2 Gyr (see below). An isochrone for this age is shown with a dashed line. The primary star is seen to be almost halfway through its main-sequence phase.

At this relatively old age it is not surprising that we found the components’ rotation to be synchronized with the motion in a circular orbit, as the theoretically expected timescales for synchronization and orbit circularization are $\sim$1 Myr and $\sim$200 Myr, respectively [e.g., @Hilditch:2001].

The radii and
$ -0.523 \pm 0.039$\ 
 $ BC_{\rm V}$ (mag) & $ -0.02 \pm 0.10 $ & $ -0.30 \pm 0.11$\ 
 $ M_{\rm bol}$ (mag) & $ 3.192 \pm 0.098 $ & $ 6.041 \pm 0.097$\ 
 $ M_V$ (mag) & $ 3.17 \pm 0.14 $ & $ 6.34 \pm 0.17$\ 
 $ m - M$ (mag)&\ 
 Distance (pc)&\ 
 Parallax (mas)&\ 
 $ v_{\rm sync } \sin i$ () & $ 28.4 \pm 0.2 $ & $ 13.9 \pm 0.2$\ 
 $ v \sin i$ () & $ 26 \pm 2 $ & $ 12 \pm 2 $ 

 Comparison with stellar evolution model { # sec: mannequin } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The accurate properties for   are compare with prediction from current stellar evolution hypothesis in Figure   \[fig: mistlogg\ ]. The evolutionary tracks for the measured masses of the component were taken from the grid of MESA Isochrones and leading Tracks [ MIST; @Choi:2016 ], which is based on the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics package [ MESA; @Paxton:2011; @Paxton:2013; @Paxton:2015 ]. The metallicity in the models was adjust to $ { \rm [ Fe / H ] } = -0.17 $ to provide the good fit to the temperatures of the star. This composition is not far from the photometric estimate reported in the first place. The shaded areas in the figure indicate the uncertainty in the placement of the tracks that comes from the errors in the measured masses. Solar - metallicity lead are shown with dotted lines for reference. The age that good matches the radius of the primary is 2.2   Gyr (see below). An isochrone for this age is shown with a dashed channel. The primary star is interpret to be about halfway through its independent - sequence phase. 

 At this relatively old old age it is not surprising that we found the components ’ rotation to be synchronized with the motion in a round orbit, as the theoretically expected timescales for synchronization and orbit circularization are $ \sim$1   Myr and $ \sim$200   Myr, respectively [ e.g., @Hilditch:2001 ]. 

 The radii and
 $-0.523 \pl 0.039$\
$BC_{\rm V}$ (mag)& $-0.02 \pm 0.10$& $-0.30 \pm 0.11$\
$M_{\ro bol}$ (mag)& $3.192 \pm 0.098$ & $6.041 \pm 0.097$\
$M_V$ (mag)& $3.17 \lm 0.14$ & $6.34 \pm 0.17$\
$m-M$ (mag)&\
Distance (pc)&\
Parallax (mes)&\
$v_{\rn synx} \sin i$ ()& $28.4 \pm 0.2$& $13.9 \pm 0.2$\
$v \siv i$ ()& $26 \pm 2$& $12 \pm 2$

Compariwin with stxmlar evolutioh modzlw {#sec:models}
========================================

The accurate [roperties for  afe compared with predictions from curwent strlpar evolution jheorj yn Fjgure \[fig:mistlogg\]. The evolutionary fracks hor the measurec masses of the components werf taken from the ggid of MESA Isosyrones and Sgellar Trabns [MIST; @Chki:2016], which is based on the Moduler for Experimenjs ij Stellar Asvrophyfics package [MESA; @Pafton:2011; @Pacton:2013; @Paxton:2015]. Thc metellixity in the models wav adjusted to ${\rm [Fg/H]} = -0.17$ to prmvnde the best fit to tye tempgratuses ud tfe aters. This fom'osition is not far frim the photometric tstynate reported earliqr. The shaded areas in the figure indicatt the uncertainty in the locqtion of the tracks tjat comes from the errors in the measured masses. Solar-metanlicivy trcghr age shown with dotted lines for reference. The wfe tmat best matches the radius ov yre primary is 2.2 Gyr (szs gelow). An isochrone for thys agw is showg wiyh a dashed line. The primart star is sevn ti be almost halfwav through itr maon-seqience phase.

At this relacively old age it is not shfprising that we folnd dhe components’ rotation to be synchconizzd with ghe kotion in a circklar orbit, as the theorehicalpy expected himescales for synchronization eid orbit circolasizdtion arz $\sim$1 Mnr and $\sim$200 Myr, rqspectively [e.g., @Hilditeh:2001].

The fadii and
$-0.523 \pm 0.039$\ $BC_{\rm V}$ (mag)& $-0.02 $-0.30 0.11$\ $M_{\rm (mag)& $3.192 \pm $M_V$ $3.17 \pm 0.14$ $6.34 \pm 0.17$\ (mag)&\ Distance (pc)&\ Parallax (mas)&\ $v_{\rm \sin i$ ()& $28.4 \pm 0.2$& $13.9 \pm 0.2$\ $v \sin i$ ()& \pm 2$& $12 \pm 2$ Comparison with stellar evolution models {#sec:models} ======================================== The properties are with from current stellar evolution theory in Figure \[fig:mistlogg\]. The evolutionary tracks for the measured masses of components were taken from the grid of MESA and Stellar Tracks [MIST; which is based on the for in Stellar package @Paxton:2011; @Paxton:2015]. The metallicity the models was adjusted to ${\rm [Fe/H]} = -0.17$ to provide the best fit to the temperatures the stars. is not from photometric reported earlier. The in the figure indicate the uncertainty of the tracks that comes from the errors the measured Solar-metallicity tracks are shown with dotted for reference. The age that best matches the of the primary is 2.2 Gyr (see below). An isochrone for this age is shown dashed line. The primary is seen to almost through main-sequence At this old age it is not surprising that we found the components’ to be synchronized with the motion in a circular orbit, theoretically timescales for synchronization orbit circularization are $\sim$1 and Myr, respectively [e.g., @Hilditch:2001]. and
 $-0.523 \pm 0.039$\
$BC_{\rm V}$ (mag)& $-0.02 \pm 0.10$& $-0.30 \pm 0.11$\
$M_{\rm bol}$ (mag)& $3.192 \pm 0.098$ & $6.041 \Pm 0.097$\
$M_V$ (mag)& $3.17 \pm 0.14$ & $6.34 \pM 0.17$\
$m-M$ (maG)&\
DiStaNcE (pc)&\
PAralLax (mas)&\
$v_{\rm sync} \sIN i$ ()& $28.4 \pm 0.2$& $13.9 \Pm 0.2$\
$v \sin i$ ()& $26 \pm 2$& $12 \pm 2$

Comparison wIth stElLAr evOLuTion mOdels {#seC:MoDELs}
========================================

THe AcCurAtE PrOpertIes For  are cOmpared witH prEdIctions from cURrEnt stellar EvoLution theory In FIgure \[fIg:MisTLogg\]. THe eVolutIonary TRacks fOr the measUrED masseS Of the coMPOnEnts Were taken from the gRId OF MESA IsochroneS and StElLAr tRAckS [MIsT; @Choi:2016], whicH iS baseD On the MoDUlES FOr EXPeriments in StEllar AstropHYsiCs packAgE [MEsa; @PaxtoN:2011; @PaxtOn:2013; @pAxtOn:2015]. The metallIcitY in the modEls was ADjusted TO ${\rm [Fe/H]} = -0.17$ tO proviDe tHe bEst fIT tO tHe tEmPEraTUrEs oF The Stars. ThiS cOmPositIon iS NOT Far fRom The pHotomEtric estimate RepOrteD EarLier. THe shaDed aReAs in tHe figuRe indIcAte the uncertainTy in The locatiOn oF tHe tRaCks thAT comes FroM thE errors In the meASurEd MASSeS. Solar-metallicity tRaCKS aRe shown wIth dotTEd LiNEs for refErEncE. The AGE that Best MAtChes the rAdius oF ThE pRimary iS 2.2 GYr (see bElOw). AN isOchroNE for This agE is shown With a DAshed line. The prIMary star is seeN To BE AlMOst hAlfWay through iTs maIN-seqUencE PhAse.

aT this RelatIvELy OLd age it is not surprisInG that wE founD the componentS’ rotation tO BE SynchronIzed WItH The motion in a ciRculaR orbit, as thE TheoretiCally Expected TimescaleS FOr synchrOniZatIon And ORBiT circularizatION are $\SiM$1 Myr and $\Sim$200 myr, respEctIveLy [e.G., @HiLdItch:2001].

The raDii and
 $-0.523 \pm 0.039$\
$BC_{ \rm V}$ (m ag)&$-0 .02  \ pm 0 .10$ & $-0.30 \pm 0 . 11$\ 
$M_{\rm bol}$ (mag)&$3.19 2\ pm 0 . 09 8$ &$6.041\ pm 0 .09 7$ \$M_ V$ (m ag)&$3. 17 \pm0.14$ & $6 .34  \ pm 0.17$\
$m - M$  (mag)&\
D ist ance (pc)&\Par allax(m as) & \
$v_ {\r m syn c} \si n  i$ () & $28.4 \ pm 0.2$&$ 13.9 \p m 0. 2$\$v \sin i$ ()& $2 6  \ p m 2$& $12 \pm2$

Co mp a ri s o n w ith  stellar e vo lutio n  models {# s e c :mo d els}
======== =========== = === ====== == === = =====
Theac c ura te properti es f or  are c ompare d  with p r edictio ns fro m c urr ents te ll arev o lut i on  th e ory  in Figu re  \ [fig: mist l o g g \].The  evo lutio nary tracks f orthem eas uredmasse s of  t he co mponen ts we re  taken from the  gri d of MESA  Is oc hro ne s and Stella r T rac ks [MIS T; @Cho i :20 16 ] , wh ich is based on th eM o du les forExperi m en ts in Stell ar  As trop h y sicspack a ge  [MESA;@Paxto n :2 01 1; @Pax to n:2013 ;@Pa xto n:201 5 ]. T he met allicity  in t h e models was a d justed to ${\ r m[ F e/ H ]} =  -0 .17$ to pro vide thebest fi t t o  thetempe ra t ur e s of the stars. Thi scompos ition  is not far f rom the ph o t o metric e stim a te reported earli er. T he shadeda reas inthe f igure in dicate th e uncertai nty  in  th e l o c at ion of the tr a c ks t ha t comes  fr om theerr ors  in  th emeasuredmasses.So la r- me tal licit y  tracksar e s ho wnwithd ottedlines  for  r ef e ren ce. The ag e that  b es t ma tch es  theradi u s o f the p rimary is  2. 2  Gyr  ( se e below ). An isochro ne  for thisag e i s show n with a d ashed line. The primary star is  se en to  bealmost ha lfw ay thr oug h  its m ain-se quenc epha s e .

At t hi s r el atively ol d age  it i snotsurpris ing that we foundt hecomponents’ r ota tion t obes yn c hro ni z edw i th the motion i n a circul ar or bit, as th e  th eo retical ly expe ctedt imescal es for sy nchroniza ti on a n d  or bit circul arizatio n are $\s i m$1 M y rand $ \si m$200My r,respe ctivel y  [e .g.,@Hildi tc h:2001 ].

T he  radii a nd
 $-0.523_\pm 0.039$\
$BC_{\rm_V}$ (mag)& $-0.02 \pm_0.10$& $-0.30_\pm_0.11$\
$M_{\rm bol}$_(mag)&_$3.192 \pm 0.098$_& $6.041 \pm_0.097$\
$M_V$ (mag)& $3.17 \pm_0.14$ & $6.34_\pm_0.17$\
$m-M$ (mag)&\
Distance (pc)&\
Parallax (mas)&\
$v_{\rm sync} \sin i$ ()& $28.4 \pm 0.2$& $13.9 \pm 0.2$\
$v_\sin_i$ ()&_$26_\pm_2$& $12 \pm 2$

Comparison with_stellar evolution models {#sec:models}
========================================

The accurate_properties for_ are compared with predictions from current stellar evolution_theory_in Figure \[fig:mistlogg\]. The_evolutionary tracks for the measured masses of the components_were taken from the grid of_MESA Isochrones and_Stellar_Tracks_[MIST; @Choi:2016], which is_based on the Modules for Experiments_in Stellar Astrophysics package [MESA; @Paxton:2011;_@Paxton:2013; @Paxton:2015]. The metallicity in the models_was adjusted to ${\rm [Fe/H]} =_-0.17$ to provide the best_fit to_the temperatures of the stars._This composition is_not far_from the photometric_estimate reported earlier. The shaded areas_in the figure_indicate the uncertainty in the location_of_the tracks that_comes_from_the errors_in the measured_masses._Solar-metallicity tracks_are_shown with dotted lines for reference._The_age that best matches the radius of_the primary is 2.2 Gyr_(see_below). An isochrone for_this age is shown with_a dashed line. The primary star_is seen_to be_almost halfway through its main-sequence phase.

At this relatively old age it_is not surprising that we found_the components’ rotation to_be synchronized_with_the motion in_a_circular orbit,_as the theoretically expected timescales for synchronization_and orbit_circularization are $\sim$1 Myr and $\sim$200 Myr, respectively_[e.g., @Hilditch:2001].

The radii and