{1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2-1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ and the claim follows.

Many properties and identities involving Chebyshev polynomials are consequence of being solutions of the Chebyshev equations. For instance, from the above lemma we have the following classical identities, see $(1.14)$ and $(1.15)$ in [@MH03], $$\label{doubling:second}
U_{2k}(x)=W_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ,$$ which in turns implies that $$\label{doubling:first}
T_{2k}(x)=T_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=xV_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ.$$

The next result shows that any difference equation with constant coefficients is equivalent to a Chebyshev equation. Although it is a known result, see [@ABD05 Theorem 3.1], we reproduce here its proof, for the sake of completeness.

\[Ch:complex\] Consider $a,c\in \KK^*$, $b\in \KK$ and $z\in \ell(\KK)$ a solution of the second order difference equation with constant coefficients $$az(k+1)-bz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in \ZZ.$$ Then $z(k)=(\sqrt{a^{-1}c})^{k}v(k)$, $k\in \ZZ$, where $v\in \ell(\CC)$ is a solution of the Chebyshev equation $$v(k+1)-2qv(k)+v(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in \ZZ$$ whose parameter is $q=\dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. Moreover, if $\KK=\RR$ and $ac>0$ then $v \in\ell(\RR)$, whereas when $
{ 1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2 - 1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ and the claim follows. 

 Many properties and identities imply Chebyshev polynomial are consequence of being solutions of the Chebyshev equations. For case, from the above lemma we own the following classical identity, experience $ (1.14)$ and $ (1.15)$ in [ @MH03 ], $ $ \label{doubling: second } 
 U_{2k}(x)=W_k(2x^2 - 1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2x^2 - 1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ,$$ which in turns imply that $ $ \label{doubling: first } 
 T_{2k}(x)=T_k(2x^2 - 1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=xV_k(2x^2 - 1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ.$$ 

 The next resultant role shows that any difference equality with constant coefficients is equivalent to a Chebyshev equality. Although it is a known result, determine [ @ABD05 Theorem 3.1 ], we regurgitate here its proof, for the sake of completeness. 

 \[Ch: complex\ ] Consider $ a, c\in \KK^*$, $ b\in \KK$ and $ z\in \ell(\KK)$ a solution of the second order dispute equation with constant coefficient $ $ az(k+1)-bz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25 cm } k\in \ZZ.$$ Then $ z(k)=(\sqrt{a^{-1}c})^{k}v(k)$, $ k\in \ZZ$, where $ v\in \ell(\CC)$ is a solution of the Chebyshev equality $ $ v(k+1)-2qv(k)+v(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25 cm } k\in \ZZ$$ whose parameter is $ q=\dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. Moreover, if $ \KK=\RR$ and $ ac>0 $ then $ v \in\ell(\RR)$, whereas when $
{1}{2q}\bih[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2-1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ akd the claim follows.

Manb propedties ana identities involving Chebydhwv pooynomials are consequevce of bepng solutuons if the Cheugshev equatiohd. Fox mnstance, from tme above lekma we have tha woplowing classical identities, see $(1.14)$ agd $(1.15)$ in [@KH03], $$\label{doubling:fecomq}
U_{2k}(x)=S_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25bm}k\in \ZZ,$$ which in turns implies that $$\label{dlubllng:first}
T_{2k}(x)=T_k(2x^2-1)\hspafe{.25cm}\hbox{and}\yspasw{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=xV_k(2x^2-1), \hrpace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ.$$

The next tesult shows that any difference equacion with cinwtajj coefficienvs is vquivalent to a Chebyvhev eqiation. Althougm it ms a known result, see [@ABD05 Theorem 3.1], we reproquce here ics proof, for the sake od comkletetess.

\[Zy:coopltx\] Ronaider $w,c\ii \KK^*$, $b\in \KK$ and $z\in \elo(\KK)$ a solution of tne wecond order sifferqnse equation with constant coefficients $$dz(k+1)-gz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in \ZZ.$$ Tyen $z(k)=(\sqrt{a^{-1}c})^{k}v(k)$, $k\in \ZE$, where $v\ig \ell(\CC)$ is a solution of the Chebyshev equation $$v(n+1)-2qv(k)+v(i-1)=0,\fspcgc{.25cm} y\un \ZZ$$ whose parameter is $q=\dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. Moreover, jf $\KL=\RR$ and $ac>0$ thek $v \in\ell(\RR)$, whereax ahrg $
{1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2-1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ and the claim follows. Many properties involving polynomials are of being solutions instance, the above lemma have the following identities, see $(1.14)$ and $(1.15)$ in $$\label{doubling:second} U_{2k}(x)=W_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ,$$ which in turns implies that $$\label{doubling:first} T_{2k}(x)=T_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=xV_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in The next result shows that any difference equation with constant coefficients is equivalent a equation. it a known result, see [@ABD05 Theorem 3.1], we reproduce here its proof, for the sake of \[Ch:complex\] Consider $a,c\in \KK^*$, $b\in \KK$ and $z\in a solution of the order difference equation with constant $$az(k+1)-bz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} \ZZ.$$ Then $k\in where \ell(\CC)$ is a of the Chebyshev equation $$v(k+1)-2qv(k)+v(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in \ZZ$$ whose parameter is $q=\dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. Moreover, if $\KK=\RR$ and $ac>0$ then \in\ell(\RR)$, whereas
{1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2-1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ And the claiM follOws.

manY pRopeRtieS and identities INvolVing Chebyshev polynomiaLs are CoNSequENcE of beIng soluTIoNS Of tHe chEbyShEV eQuatiOns. for instAnce, from thE abOvE lemma we have THe Following cLasSical identitIes, See $(1.14)$ and $(1.15)$ In [@mH03], $$\lABel{doUblIng:seCond}
U_{2k}(X)=w_k(2x^2-1)\hspAce{.25cm}\hbox{AnD}\Hspace{.25CM}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2X^2-1), \HSpAce{.25cM}k\in \ZZ,$$ which in turnS ImPLies that $$\label{dOublinG:fIRsT}
t_{2K}(x)=T_K(2x^2-1)\hSpace{.25cm}\hboX{aNd}\hspACe{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=Xv_k(2X^2-1), \HSPacE{.25Cm}k\in \ZZ.$$

The nexT result showS ThaT any diFfEreNCe equaTion wItH ConStant coeffiCienTs is equivAlent tO A ChebysHEv equatIon. AltHouGh iT is a KNoWn ResUlT, See [@abD05 theORem 3.1], We reprodUcE hEre itS proOF, FOR the SakE of cOmpleTeness.

\[Ch:complEx\] COnsiDEr $a,C\in \KK^*$, $B\in \KK$ And $z\In \Ell(\KK)$ A solutIon of ThE second order difFereNce equatiOn wItH coNsTant cOEfficiEntS $$az(K+1)-bz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\Hspace{.25cM} K\in \zZ.$$ tHEN $z(K)=(\sqrt{a^{-1}c})^{k}v(k)$, $k\in \ZZ$, wheRe $V\IN \eLl(\CC)$ is a sOlutioN Of ThE chebysheV eQuaTion $$V(K+1)-2Qv(k)+v(k-1)=0,\HspaCE{.25cM} k\in \ZZ$$ whOse parAMeTeR is $q=\dfrAc{B}{2\sqrt{aC}}$. MOreOveR, if $\KK=\rr$ and $Ac>0$ then $V \in\ell(\RR)$, WhereAS when $
{1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2 (2q^2-1)z_ {2,m} (k) +z_ {2 ,m}( k-1) \big]\end{arra y }$$and the claim follows. 

Man yp rope r ti es an d ident i ti e s  in vo lv ing  C h eb yshev  po lynomia ls are con seq ue nce of being so lutions of  th e Chebyshevequ ations .For insta nce , fro m thea bove l emma we h av e  the f o llowing c la ssic al identities, se e  $ ( 1.14)$ and $(1 .15)$in [@ M H 03] , $ $\label{do ub ling: s econd}U _{ 2 k } (x) = W_k(2x^2-1)\h space{.25cm } \hb ox{and }\ hsp a ce{.25 cm}U_ {2 k +1} (x)=2x U_k( 2x^2 -1), \hsp ace{.2 5 cm}k\in \ZZ,$$whichintur ns i m pl ie s t ha t  $$ \ la bel { dou bling:fi rs t} 
T_{2 k}(x ) = T _ k(2x ^2- 1)\h space {.25cm}\hbox{ and }\hs p ace {.25c m}T_{ 2k+1 }( x)=xV _k(2x^ 2-1),  \ hspace{.25cm}k\ in \ ZZ.$$

Th e n ex t r es ult s h ows th atany  differ ence eq u ati on w i th  constant coeffici en t s  i s equiva lent t o  a  C h ebysheveq uat ion. A lthou gh i t  i s a know n resu l t,  s ee [@AB D0 5 Theo re m 3 .1] , wer epro duce h ere itsproof ,  for the sakeo f completenes s .\ [C h :com ple x\] Conside r $a , c\in  \KK ^ *$ , $ b \in \ KK$ a nd $z \ in \ell(\KK)$ a sol ut ion of  thesecond orderdifference e q uation w ithc on s tant coefficie nts $ $az(k+1)-b z (k)+cz(k -1)=0 ,\hspace {.25cm} k \ i n \ZZ.$$  Th en$z( k)= ( \ sq rt{a^{-1}c})^ { k }v(k )$ , $k\in  \Z Z$, whe re$v\ in\el l( \CC)$ isa soluti on  o fth e C hebys h ev equat io n $ $v (k+ 1)-2q v (k)+v( k-1)= 0,\h sp ac e {.2 5cm} k\ i n\ Z Z$$wh os e pa ram et er is  $q= \ dfr ac{b}{2 \sqrt{ac} }$. More ov er , if $\ KK=\RR$ and $ ac >0$ then $ v\in \ell(\ R R )$, wher eas when $
{1}{2q}\big[z_{2,m}(k+1)-2(2q^2-1)z_{2,m}(k)+z_{2,m}(k-1)\big]\end{array}$$ and_the claim_follows.

Many properties and identities_involving Chebyshev_polynomials_are consequence_of_being solutions of_the Chebyshev equations._For instance, from the_above lemma we_have_the following classical identities, see $(1.14)$ and $(1.15)$ in [@MH03], $$\label{doubling:second}
U_{2k}(x)=W_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}U_{2k+1}(x)=2x U_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ,$$_which_in turns_implies_that_$$\label{doubling:first}
T_{2k}(x)=T_k(2x^2-1)\hspace{.25cm}\hbox{and}\hspace{.25cm}T_{2k+1}(x)=xV_k(2x^2-1), \hspace{.25cm}k\in \ZZ.$$

The next result_shows that any difference equation_with constant_coefficients is equivalent to a Chebyshev equation. Although_it_is a known_result, see [@ABD05 Theorem 3.1], we reproduce here its_proof, for the sake of completeness.

\[Ch:complex\]_Consider $a,c\in \KK^*$,_$b\in_\KK$_and $z\in \ell(\KK)$ a_solution of the second order difference_equation with constant coefficients $$az(k+1)-bz(k)+cz(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in_\ZZ.$$ Then $z(k)=(\sqrt{a^{-1}c})^{k}v(k)$, $k\in \ZZ$, where $v\in_\ell(\CC)$ is a solution of the_Chebyshev equation $$v(k+1)-2qv(k)+v(k-1)=0,\hspace{.25cm} k\in \ZZ$$_whose parameter_is $q=\dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. Moreover, if $\KK=\RR$_and $ac>0$ then_$v \in\ell(\RR)$,_whereas when $