 This should be regarded as a convenient piece of terminology rather than a formal definition: whenever a one-dimensional component $L_i$ formally satisfies the relations of a fake diamond of type $1$, the next component $L_{i+1}$ satisfies those of a fake diamond of type $0$. However, as a rule, only one of them ought to be called a fake diamond, usually because it fits into a sequence of (genuine) diamonds occurring at regular distances.

Before continuing with our description of basic properties of Nottingham Lie algebras we briefly comment on what happens if we temporarily relax our blanket assumptions $p$ odd and $q>3$. Many thin Lie algebras $L$ exist where $L_3$ is the second diamond, and a summary of the known ones is given in [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. In particular, in characteristic $p=3$ they include Lie algebras which ought to be included in the class of Nottingham Lie algebras, see [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. This is so when generators $X$ and $Y$ can be chosen such that relations  hold, even though uniqueness of $\langle X\rangle$ and $\langle Y\rangle$ fails in this case. With this extended definition the Nottingham Lie algebras which we construct in Sections \[sec:big-field\] and \[sec:prime-field\] will be such also for $q=3$, with the diamond types determined by relations  as usual. The picture for characteristic two is more peculiar, because the second diamond fails to reveal itself as such, being fake of type $1=-1$. It can even occur that all diamonds past the first are fake, and such a Nottingham Lie algebra disguises itself as a graded Lie algebra of maximal class. We refer the reader to the last part of [@AviMat:A-Z Section 3] for a discussion, we safely exclude characteristic two from our statements, but provide an interpretation for them in Remarks \[rem:char2-big\] and \[rem:char2-prime\].

Resuming our general discussion of Nottingham Lie algebras, it was proved in [@CaMa:Nottingham] that $$\label{eq:second_chain}
 C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = C_{L_1}(L_{2q-3})=\langle Y \rangle,$$ provided $p>5
This should be regarded as a convenient piece of terminology rather than a conventional definition: whenever a one - dimensional part $ L_i$ formally satisfies the relations of a bogus diamond of character $ 1 $, the next component $ L_{i+1}$ satisfy those of a fake diamond of character $ 0$. However, as a dominion, only one of them ought to be call a fake diamond, normally because it fits into a sequence of (genuine) diamonds occurring at regular distances. 

 Before cover with our description of basic properties of Nottingham Lie algebras we briefly gloss on what happens if we temporarily relax our blanket assumption $ p$ odd and $ q>3$. Many slender Lie algebras $ L$ exist where $ L_3 $ is the second diamond, and a summary of the known ones is given in   [ @AviMat: A - Z Remark   3.4 ]. In especial, in characteristic $ p=3 $ they include Lie algebras which ought to be included in the class of Nottingham Lie algebras, see   [ @AviMat: A - Z Remark   3.4 ]. This is so when generators $ X$ and $ Y$ can be chosen such that relations    hold, even though uniqueness of $ \langle X\rangle$ and $ \langle Y\rangle$ fails in this case. With this extended definition the Nottingham Lie algebras which we construct in Sections   \[sec: large - field\ ] and   \[sec: prime - field\ ] will be such also for $ q=3 $, with the diamond type determine by relations    as usual. The mental picture for characteristic two is more curious, because the second diamond fails to uncover itself as such, being fake of type $ 1=-1$. It can even occur that all diamonds past the first are fake, and such a Nottingham Lie algebra disguise itself as a graded Lie algebra of maximal class. We refer the reader to the last part of   [ @AviMat: A - Z Section   3 ] for a discussion, we safely bar characteristic two from our statements, but provide an interpretation for them in Remarks   \[rem: char2 - big\ ] and   \[rem: char2 - prime\ ]. 

 Resuming our general discussion of Nottingham Lie algebra, it was proved in   [ @CaMa: Nottingham ] that $ $ \label{eq: second_chain } 
  C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = C_{L_1}(L_{2q-3})=\langle Y \rangle,$$ provided $ p>5
 Thls should be regarded as a convenient pnwce of termihology rxther than a formal definitiln: whentner a one-dimensional zomponent $L_i$ formqlly watisfies vge relabnons kn a fckx diamond of tyke $1$, the next component $L_{i+1}$ vagidfies those of a fake diamond of ty[e $0$. Howrvfr, as a rule, ogly pge or them ought to be called a fake djamond, lsually because iy fits into a sequence of (henulne) diamonds occurging at regomar eistances.

Befure continlnng with out description of basic propertier of Uottingham Oiw apcebras we bciefly comment on what hap[ens if we temporariln relex oyr blanket assumptionv $p$ odd and $q>3$. Many thin Lie amgebras $L$ exist wyeee $L_3$ hs tve sdxona djakohd, and a aummary of the known ines is given in [@AviKae:Q-Z Remark 3.4]. In lartictlwr, in characteristic $p=3$ they include Lie alfebras which ought to bw included in the clads of Noteingham Lie algebras, see [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. This is sm whei eentrqtors $Z$ wnd $Y$ can be chosen such that relations  hold, qbem nhough uniqueness of $\langle C\rwnbje$ and $\langle Y\rangle$ rails in this case. With tris eztended dtfiniyion the Nottingham Lie algwbras which ce xonstruct in Sectilns \[sec:big-fizld\] anc \[sec:ptime-field\] will be such clso fkr $q=3$, with tje diamons types determinea bj renations  as usual. The pictuwe for cheractzristic gwo os morq peculiar, becamve the second diamlnd fcils do reveal ltself as such, being fake of ty'x $1=-1$. It can evem mcclr that ajl dismonds past tre first are fcke, and fuch x Nottinghzm Lie elgebra disgtises itself dd a graded Lme algebrw of maxumal clxrs. We refer thr reader no the last part of [@AviMab:A-Z Sgcfion 3] for a discbrwion, we safely rxcuudq bhacactewhstic two frmm ojr ryatemdnts, buu pvovkde sn interpretation fos thsm in Remarks \[rem:chsr2-nig\] and \[ren:char2-priie\].

Resuming out general discussiln of Novtinghsm Jie algebras, it was proved in [@CzMa:Nottinhhai] that $$\label{qq:segond_shain}
 C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = C_{L_1}(L_{2q-3})=\langle Y \rangle,$$ provided $p>5
This should be regarded as a convenient terminology than a definition: whenever a the of a fake of type $1$, next component $L_{i+1}$ satisfies those of fake diamond of type $0$. However, as a rule, only one of them to be called a fake diamond, usually because it fits into a sequence (genuine) occurring regular Before continuing with our description of basic properties of Nottingham Lie algebras we briefly comment on happens if we temporarily relax our blanket assumptions odd and $q>3$. Many Lie algebras $L$ exist where is second diamond, a of known ones is in [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. In particular, in characteristic $p=3$ they include Lie algebras which ought to be in the Nottingham Lie see Remark This is so $X$ and $Y$ can be chosen hold, even though uniqueness of $\langle X\rangle$ and Y\rangle$ fails this case. With this extended definition Nottingham Lie algebras which we construct in Sections and \[sec:prime-field\] will be such also for $q=3$, with the diamond types determined by relations The picture for characteristic is more peculiar, the diamond to itself as being fake of type $1=-1$. It can even occur that all past the first are fake, and such a Nottingham Lie itself a graded Lie of maximal class. We the to the last part Section for safely characteristic from our statements, but an interpretation for them in \[rem:char2-big\] and \[rem:char2-prime\]. Resuming Lie algebras, it was proved in [@CaMa:Nottingham] that C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = C_{L_1}(L_{2q-3})=\langle Y \rangle,$$ provided
 This should be regarded as a coNvenient piEce of TerMinOlOgy rAtheR than a formal deFInitIon: whenever a one-dimensiOnal cOmPOnenT $l_i$ FormaLly satiSFiES The ReLaTioNs OF a Fake dIamOnd of tyPe $1$, the next cOmpOnEnt $L_{i+1}$ satisfiES tHose of a fakE diAmond of type $0$. HOweVer, as a RuLe, oNLy one Of tHem ouGht to bE Called A fake diamOnD, UsuallY Because IT FiTs inTo a sequence of (genuINe) DIamonds occurriNg at reGuLAr DIStaNceS.

Before conTiNuing WIth our dEScRIPTioN Of basic properTies of NottiNGhaM Lie alGeBraS We brieFly coMmENt oN what happenS if wE temporarIly relAX our blaNKet assuMptionS $p$ oDd aNd $q>3$. MANy ThIn LIe ALgeBRaS $L$ eXIst Where $L_3$ is ThE sEcond DiamOND, ANd a sUmmAry oF the kNown ones is givEn iN [@AvimAt:A-z RemaRk 3.4]. In pArtiCuLar, in CharacTerisTiC $p=3$ they include LiE algEbras whicH ouGhT to Be IncluDEd in thE clAss Of NottiNgham LiE AlgEbRAS, SeE [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. ThiS iS SO wHen generAtors $X$ ANd $y$ cAN be choseN sUch That RELatioNs  hoLD, eVen thougH uniquENeSs Of $\langlE X\Rangle$ AnD $\laNglE Y\ranGLe$ faIls in tHis case. WIth thIS extended definITion the NottinGHaM lIe ALgebRas Which we consTrucT In SeCtioNS \[sEc:bIG-fielD\] and \[sEc:PRiME-field\] will be such alsO fOr $q=3$, witH the dIamond types deTermined by RELAtions  as UsuaL. thE Picture for charActerIstic two is MOre peculIar, beCause the Second diaMONd fails tO reVeaL itSelF AS sUch, being fake oF TYpe $1=-1$. IT cAn even oCcuR that alL diAmoNds PasT tHe first arE fake, and SuCh A NOtTinGham LIE algebra DiSguIsEs iTself AS a gradEd Lie AlgeBrA oF MaxImal claSS. WE REfer ThE rEadeR to ThE last Part OF [@AvIMat:A-Z SEction 3] for A diSCussIoN, wE safely Exclude characTeRistic two fRoM ouR stateMENts, but prOvide an interpretation foR Them in REmaRks \[reM:chaR2-big\] and \[reM:chAr2-primE\].

ReSUming oUr geneRal diScUssION of NoTTInGhaM LIe algebras, IT Was ProveD iN [@CaMA:NottinGham] that $$\label{eq:secONd_cHain}
 C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = c_{L_1}(L_{2Q-3})=\lanGLE Y \RanGLe,$$ PRovIdED $p>5
 This should be regarded a s a conven ientpie ceof  ter mino logy rather th a n aformal definition: whe never  a one- d im ensio nal com p on e n t $ L_ i$  fo rm a ll y sat isf ies the  relations  of  a  fake diamon d  o f type $1$ , t he next comp one nt $L_ {i +1} $  sati sfi es th ose of a fake  diamondof type $ 0 $. Howe v e r,  asa rule, only oneo ft hem ought to b e call ed af a kedia mond, usua ll y bec a use itf it s i nto a sequence of  (genuine)d iam onds o cc urr i ng atregul ar dis tances.

Be fore  continui ng wit h  our de s criptio n of b asi c p rope r ti es  of  N o tti n gh amL iealgebras  w ebrief ly c o m m e nt o n w hathappe ns if we temp ora rily rel ax ou r bla nket  a ssump tions$p$ o dd  and $q>3$. Man y th in Lie al geb ra s $ L$  exis t  where  $L _3$  is the  second dia mo n d ,  a nd a summary of th ek n ow n ones i s give n  i n[ @AviMat: A- Z R emar k 3.4].  Inp ar ticular,  in ch a ra ct eristic  $ p=3$ t he y i ncl ude L i e al gebras  which o ughtt o be includedi n the class o f  N o t ti n gham  Li e algebras,  see [@Av iMat : A- Z R e mark3.4].  T h is is so when generato rs  $X$ a nd $Y $ can be chos en such th a t relation s  h o ld ,  even though u nique ness of $\ l angle X\ rangl e$ and $ \langle Y \ r angle$ f ail s i n t his c as e. With thise x tend ed  defini tio n the N ott ing ham  Li ealgebraswhich we  c on st ru ctin Se c tions \[ se c:b ig -fi eld\] and \[ sec:p rime -f ie l d\]  will b e  s u c h al so  f or $ q=3 $,  with  the dia mond ty pes deter min e d by  r el ations as usual. Th epicture fo rcha racter i s tic twois more peculiar, becau s e the s eco nd di amon d fails t o r evealits e lf assuch,being  f ake o f typ e $1 =-1 $.  It can ev e n  oc cur t ha t al l diamo nds past the first are  fake, and su cha No t t in gha m  L i e a lg e bra d isguises itself  as a grad ed Li e algebrao f m ax imal cl ass. We  refe r  the re ader to t he last p ar t of [ @Av iMat:A-Z S ection 3 ] for a d i scuss i on , wesaf ely ex cl ude  char acteri s tic  twofrom o ur  state ments ,but prov ide an interpretation f or the m inRem arks \[re m:c h ar2 -big\] an d \[ rem:char2- pri me\ ].

R esu m ing o ur g e ne ral discu ssio n  of Notti n gh amL i ealgebras, i t w asprove d i n  [@CaM a:No ttingham] that $$ \ label{eq:secon d_ch a i n} C_ { L_1} (L _{q+1})= \cdot s =  C _ { L_1}(L_{ 2q -3})=\langl e Y \ran gl e ,$$ p rovide d $p>5 
 This_should be_regarded as a convenient_piece of_terminology_rather than_a_formal definition: whenever_a one-dimensional component_$L_i$ formally satisfies the_relations of a_fake_diamond of type $1$, the next component $L_{i+1}$ satisfies those of a fake diamond_of_type $0$._However,_as_a rule, only one of_them ought to be called_a fake_diamond, usually because it fits into a sequence_of_(genuine) diamonds occurring_at regular distances.

Before continuing with our description of basic_properties of Nottingham Lie algebras we_briefly comment on_what_happens_if we temporarily relax_our blanket assumptions $p$ odd and_$q>3$. Many thin Lie algebras $L$_exist where $L_3$ is the second diamond,_and a summary of the known_ones is given in [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]._In particular,_in characteristic $p=3$ they include_Lie algebras which_ought to_be included in_the class of Nottingham Lie algebras,_see [@AviMat:A-Z Remark 3.4]. This_is so when generators $X$ and_$Y$_can be chosen_such_that_relations  hold,_even though uniqueness_of_$\langle X\rangle$_and_$\langle Y\rangle$ fails in this case._With_this extended definition the Nottingham Lie algebras_which we construct in_Sections \[sec:big-field\]_and \[sec:prime-field\] will be such_also for $q=3$, with the_diamond types determined by relations  as_usual. The_picture for_characteristic two is more peculiar, because the second diamond fails to_reveal itself as such, being fake_of type $1=-1$. It_can even_occur_that all diamonds_past_the first_are fake, and such a Nottingham Lie_algebra disguises_itself as a graded Lie algebra_of maximal class. We_refer_the reader to the last part_of [@AviMat:A-Z Section 3] for a discussion, we_safely exclude characteristic two from_our_statements,_but provide an interpretation for_them in Remarks \[rem:char2-big\] and \[rem:char2-prime\].

Resuming our general_discussion of Nottingham_Lie algebras, it was proved in [@CaMa:Nottingham] that_$$\label{eq:second_chain}
_C_{L_1}(L_{q+1})= \cdots = C_{L_1}(L_{2q-3})=\langle Y \rangle,$$_provided_$p>5