 solely from blockage in a constriction too small to accomodate the fiber. Moreover, the fiber is observed to cross other regions of the fracture with a similar aperture without getting stopped. Blockage of the fibers may also result from a large local slope of the surfaces, even if the local spacing remains large. In this case, the hydrodynamic forces may be too small to induce enough bending of the fibers so that they follow the slope of the surface and do not touch it. Examining the geometry of the individual wall surfaces around the pinning points tends to confirm this hypothesis. Finally, the inertia of the fiber may also favour contacts with the walls and blockage: this effect should increase with the fluid velocity.

![Variation of the fiber geometry during the fifth pinning event in Fig. \[fig:fiberwedge\]a (lowest horizontal arrow). The leftmost (respectively rightmost) picture displays the shape of the fiber immediately after pinning (respectively before depinning). Time lapse between pictures: $0.166\ s$; total duration of trapping event: $1\ s$. Arrows: location of points of maximum curvature referred to as $0$, $1$ and $2$.[]{data-label="fig:fiberpinwater"}](figure5.eps){width="\W"}

More information on the pinning-depinning process is obtained from the geometry of the fiber. The variations of the code color with time and distance in Fig. \[fig:spatio\]b indicate that, in contrast to the case of a smooth fracture (Fig. \[fig:spatio\]a), the fiber does not remain straight: it displays a buckling instability and meanders of shape and location varying with time appear. These variations are visualized directly in Figure \[fig:fiberpinwater\] displaying the deformations of the fiber. During the pinning event, the tip of the fiber remains motionless while three bumps appear behind it; their amplitude increases with time while they propagate toward the tip. The deformation of the rear part of the fiber is much weaker while, in some cases, it gets translated sideways.

![Variation with time of the absolute values $|R|$ of the radius of curvature of the fiber at the $3$ maximum curvature points designated by arrows in Fig. \[fig:fiberpinwater\]. Inset: time variation of the vertical distances $\delta x$ between these $3$ points and the fiber tip. Symbols for point
solely from blockage in a constriction too small to accomodate the roughage. furthermore, the fiber is observed to thwart early regions of the fracture with a similar aperture without getting stop. Blockage of the fibers may besides leave from a large local slope of the surface, even if the local spacing remains large. In this case, the hydrodynamic power may be too small to induce enough bending of the fibers so that they keep up the slope of the surface and do not touch it. examine the geometry of the individual wall surfaces around the pinning points tend to confirm this hypothesis. Finally, the inertia of the fiber may also prefer contacts with the walls and blockage: this effect should increase with the fluid velocity. 

! [ Variation of the fiber geometry during the fifth pinning event in Fig.   \[fig: fiberwedge\]a (lowest horizontal arrow). The leftmost (respectively rightmost) picture displays the shape of the fiber immediately after pinning (respectively before depinning). Time oversight between pictures: $ 0.166\ s$; total duration of trap consequence: $ 1\ s$. arrow: location of points of maximal curvature referred to as $ 0 $, $ 1 $ and $ 2$.[]{data - label="fig: fiberpinwater"}](figure5.eps){width="\W " } 

 More data on the pinning - depinning process is obtained from the geometry of the roughage. The variations of the code color with time and distance in Fig.   \[fig: spatio\]b indicate that, in contrast to the case of a smooth fracture (Fig.   \[fig: spatio\]a), the fiber does not remain straight: it expose a buckling instability and meander of shape and location varying with time appear. These variation are visualized directly in Figure   \[fig: fiberpinwater\ ] displaying the contortion of the fiber. During the pinning event, the tip of the character remains inactive while three bumps appear behind it; their amplitude increases with time while they propagate toward the gratuity. The deformation of the rear contribution of the fiber is a lot weaker while, in some cases, it gets translated sidelong. 

! [ Variation with prison term of the absolute values $ |R|$ of the radius of curvature of the fiber at the $ 3 $ maximum curvature points designated by arrows in Fig. \[fig: fiberpinwater\ ]. Inset: time version of the vertical distances $ \delta x$ between these $ 3 $ point and the fiber tip. Symbols for point
 sopely from blockage in a gonstriction too small vo accojodate tfe fiber. Moreover, the fiber ms ovservtb to cross other regkons of tje fractyre xith a similar a'srture withouf getciig stopped. Bloclage of tha fibers may ansu xesult from a large local slope of tre surfscfs, even if the locsj spzbikg remains large. In this case, ths hydrovynamic forces kay be too small to induce enokgh bending of the fibers so jgat rhey follow ghe slope of the surfade and do not touch it. Examinine the geometry if thf individual wall surfaces around the pinninb points tends to cobfirm this hypothesis. Finally, the inertya of the fnber may also favour xobtactv widh tfw wxlla end blockwge: this effedt should ibcrease with the fliiq velocity.

![Variztion jf the fiber geometry during the fifth pitnihg event in Fig. \[fig:fiberqedge\]a (lowest horizonjal arrow). Ehe leftmost (respectively rightmost) picture displdys tie shcic of rhf fiber immediately after pinning (respectivelr btfoge depinning). Time lapse betwrej lyctures: $0.166\ s$; tojal durcfikn of trapping evejt: $1\ s$. Atrows: oocation jf ppints of maximum curvature eeferred to cs $0$, $1$ and $2$.[]{data-label="fig:yiberpinwatex"}](figurg5.eps){wicth="\W"}

More information on the pinning-deplnning prkzess is obtained frpm the geometry of the fiber. The varietionx of thd coce coljr with tile and distance in Fig. \[fih:spatno\]b itdicate thwt, in contrast to the case of a smooth fractute (Xig. \[xig:spatij\]a), thc fiber does noe remain straiyht: it dnsplayr a bucklihg instebility and ieanders of svwpe and locavion varyyng qith time aooear. These varoations age visyalized directly ik Figors \[fig:fiberpinwatzx\] eisplaying the cefurmwtponx jx the fiber. Gurivg gne pivning event, ghe yip of the fiber remdins motionless while yhvee bumps appear fehind it; theor amplitude increwses xith tmme whole they propagate toward the tip. The defogmabion of the rqar iart of the fiyer is much weaker while, in some cases, iv gets translated sidewqys.

![Variation with tnmt of the absokute dalues $|R|$ mf the radius of curcature of the fibtr at the $3$ maximum curvzture [ointd designated by arrows in Fig. \[fig:fiberpinwater\]. Inset: time variation of thw vertmcwl distancea $\dekta x$ bztwzen thefe $3$ 'omnts and the fibeg tip. Symbols for point
solely from blockage in a constriction too accomodate fiber. Moreover, fiber is observed the with a similar without getting stopped. of the fibers may also result a large local slope of the surfaces, even if the local spacing remains In this case, the hydrodynamic forces may be too small to induce enough of fibers that follow the slope of the surface and do not touch it. Examining the geometry of the wall surfaces around the pinning points tends to this hypothesis. Finally, the of the fiber may also contacts the walls blockage: effect increase with the velocity. ![Variation of the fiber geometry during the fifth pinning event in Fig. \[fig:fiberwedge\]a (lowest horizontal arrow). leftmost (respectively displays the of fiber after pinning (respectively Time lapse between pictures: $0.166\ s$; trapping event: $1\ s$. Arrows: location of points maximum curvature to as $0$, $1$ and $2$.[]{data-label="fig:fiberpinwater"}](figure5.eps){width="\W"} information on the pinning-depinning process is obtained from geometry of the fiber. The variations of the code color with time and distance in indicate that, in contrast the case of smooth (Fig. the does not straight: it displays a buckling instability and meanders of shape and varying with time appear. These variations are visualized directly in displaying deformations of the During the pinning event, tip the fiber remains motionless bumps behind increases time they propagate toward the The deformation of the rear of the fiber is cases, it gets translated sideways. ![Variation with time the absolute values $|R|$ of the radius curvature of the fiber at the $3$ maximum curvature points designated by in Fig. time variation of the vertical distances $\delta x$ these $3$ points and fiber tip. Symbols for point
 solely from blockage in a consTriction toO smalL to AccOmOdatE the Fiber. Moreover, tHE fibEr is observed to cross othEr regIoNS of tHE fRactuRe with a SImILAr aPeRtUre WiTHoUt getTinG stoppeD. Blockage oF thE fIbers may also REsUlt from a laRge Local slope of The SurfacEs, EveN If the LocAl spaCing reMAins laRge. In this CaSE, the hyDRodynamIC FoRces May be too small to inDUcE Enough bending oF the fiBeRS sO THat TheY follow the SlOpe of THe surfaCE aND DO noT Touch it. ExaminIng the geomeTRy oF the inDiVidUAl wall SurfaCeS AroUnd the pinniNg poInts tends To confIRm this hYPothesiS. FinalLy, tHe iNertIA oF tHe fIbER maY AlSo fAVouR contactS wItH the wAlls AND BLockAge: This EffecT should increaSe wIth tHE flUid veLocitY.

![VarIaTion oF the fiBer geOmEtry during the fiFth pInning eveNt iN FIg. \[fIg:FiberWEdge\]a (lOweSt hOrizontAl arrow). tHe lEfTMOSt (Respectively rightmOsT) PIcTure dispLays thE ShApE Of the fibEr ImmEdiaTELy aftEr piNNiNg (respecTively BEfOrE depinnInG). Time lApSe bEtwEen piCTureS: $0.166\ s$; totaL duratioN of trAPping event: $1\ s$. ArrOWs: location of pOInTS Of MAximUm cUrvature refErreD To as $0$, $1$ And $2$.[]{dATa-LabEL="fig:fIberpInWAtER"}](figure5.eps){width="\W"}

MorE iNformaTion oN the pinning-dePinning proCESS is obtaiNed fROm THe geometry of thE fibeR. The variatIOns of the Code cOlor with Time and diSTAnce in FiG. \[fiG:spAtiO\]b iNDIcAte that, in contRASt to ThE case of A smOoth fraCtuRe (FIg. \[fIg:sPaTio\]a), the fiBer does nOt ReMaIn StrAight: IT displayS a BucKlIng InstaBIlity aNd meaNderS oF sHApe And locaTIoN VAryiNg WiTh tiMe aPpEar. ThEse vARiaTions arE visualizEd dIRectLy In figure \[fIg:fiberpinwatEr\] Displaying ThE deFormatIONs of the fIber. During the pinning eveNT, the tip Of tHe fibEr reMains motiOnlEss whiLe tHRee bumPs appeAr behInD it; THEir amPLItUde InCreases witH TIme While ThEy prOpagate Toward the tip. The defORmaTion of the rear ParT of tHE FiBer IS mUCh wEaKEr wHILe, in some cases, it Gets translAtED sIdeways.

![VarIAtiOn With timE of the aBsoluTE values $|r|$ of the radIus of curvAtUre oF THe fIber at the $3$ mAximum cuRvature poINts deSIgNated By aRrows iN FIg. \[fIg:fibErpinwATer\]. inset: Time vaRiAtion oF the vErTical disTances $\delta x$ between thesE $3$ pointS and tHe fIber tip. SyMboLS foR point
 solely from blockage in a  constrict ion t oosma ll  toacco modate the fib e r. M oreover, the fiber isobser ve d  toc ro ss ot her reg i on s ofth efra ct u re  with  asimilar  aperturewit ho ut getting s t op ped. Block age  of the fibe rsmay al so  re s ult f rom  a la rge lo c al slo pe of the  s u rfaces ,  even i f th e lo cal spacing remai n sl arge. In thiscase,th e  h y d rod yna mic forces  m ay be too sma l lt o ind u ce enough ben ding of the fib ers so  t hat they f ollow  t h e s lope of the  sur face anddo not touch i t . Exami ning t hegeo metr y  o fthe  i n div i du alw all  surface sar oundthep i n n ingpoi ntstends  to confirm t his  hyp o the sis.Final ly,th e ine rtia o f the  f iber may also f avou r contact s w it h t he  wall s  and b loc kag e: this  effect sho ul d i nc rease with the flu id v el ocity.
![Vari a ti on of the f ib ergeom e t ry du ring th e fifthpinnin g  e ve nt in F ig . \[fi g: fib erw edge\ ] a (l owesthorizont al ar r ow). The leftm o st (respectiv e ly r ig h tmos t)picture dis play s  the  sha p eoft he fi ber i mm e di a tely after pinning(r espect ively  before depin ning). Tim e l apse bet ween pi c tures: $0.166\  s$;total dura t ion of t rappi ng event : $1\ s$. A rrows: l oca tio n o f p o i nt s of maximumc u rvat ur e refer red  to as$0$ , $ 1$and  $ 2$.[]{dat a-label= "f ig :f ib erp inwat e r"}](fig ur e5. ep s){ width = "\W"}
More  inf or ma t ion  on the pi n n ing- de pi nnin g p ro cessis o b tai ned fro m the geo met r y of  t he  fiber.  The variatio ns  of the co de  co lor wi t h  time an d distance in Fig. \[fi g :spatio \]b  indi cate  that, in  co ntrast  to the ca se ofa smo ot h f r a cture ( Fi g.\[ fig:spatio \ ] a),  thefi berdoes no t remain straight: itdisplays a bu ckl ingi n st abi l it y  an dm ean d e rs of shape and  locationva r yi ng with ti m e a pp ear. Th ese var iatio n s are v isualized  directly  i n Fi g u re\[fig:fibe rpinwate r\] displ a yingt he  defo rma tionsof  th e fib er. Du r ing  thepinnin gevent,  theti p of the  fiber remains motionle ss whi le th ree  bumps ap pea r  be hind it;thei r amplitud e i ncr eases  wi t h tim e wh i le  th e y pro paga t e towardt he  ti p .  T he deformat i o n  of  therea r  partof t he fiber is muchw eaker while, i n so m e  ca ses ,  itge ts translatedsid ew a y s.

![Va ri ation withtime ofth e  abso lute v alues$|R|$ o f th e  radiu s of  cu rvature o f t he fiber a tth e  $3$ m axim um  curva ture p o ints d esignated by arr ows i n Fig.\ [fi g:fib er pinwate r \].Inset: tim e variation  of th e ve rtica l dista nc es $\d elt ax$ between these $3$  poin ts andth e fi ber  tip.Symb o l s for  poi nt 
 solely_from blockage_in a constriction too_small to_accomodate_the fiber._Moreover,_the fiber is_observed to cross_other regions of the_fracture with a_similar_aperture without getting stopped. Blockage of the fibers may also result from a large_local_slope of_the_surfaces,_even if the local spacing_remains large. In this case,_the hydrodynamic_forces may be too small to induce enough_bending_of the fibers_so that they follow the slope of the surface_and do not touch it. Examining_the geometry of_the_individual_wall surfaces around the_pinning points tends to confirm this_hypothesis. Finally, the inertia of the_fiber may also favour contacts with the_walls and blockage: this effect should_increase with the fluid velocity.

![Variation_of the_fiber geometry during the fifth_pinning event in_Fig. \[fig:fiberwedge\]a (lowest_horizontal arrow). The_leftmost (respectively rightmost) picture displays the_shape of the_fiber immediately after pinning (respectively before_depinning)._Time lapse between_pictures:_$0.166\_s$; total_duration of trapping_event:_$1\ s$._Arrows:_location of points of maximum curvature_referred_to as $0$, $1$ and $2$.[]{data-label="fig:fiberpinwater"}](figure5.eps){width="\W"}

More information_on the pinning-depinning process_is_obtained from the geometry_of the fiber. The variations_of the code color with time_and distance_in Fig. \[fig:spatio\]b_indicate that, in contrast to the case of a smooth fracture_(Fig. \[fig:spatio\]a), the fiber does not remain_straight: it displays a_buckling instability_and_meanders of shape_and_location varying_with time appear. These variations are visualized_directly in_Figure \[fig:fiberpinwater\] displaying the deformations of the_fiber. During the pinning_event,_the tip of the fiber remains_motionless while three bumps appear behind_it; their amplitude increases with_time_while_they propagate toward the tip._The deformation of the rear part_of the fiber_is much weaker while, in some cases,_it_gets translated sideways.

![Variation with time of_the_absolute values $|R|$ of the radius_of_curvature_of the fiber at the_$3$ maximum curvature points designated by_arrows in Fig. \[fig:fiberpinwater\]. Inset: time variation of the_vertical distances $\delta_x$ between these $3$ points_and_the_fiber tip. Symbols for point