 upper bounds deteriorate as the frequency $F[\varphi]$ given by increases. Since $F[\varphi]$ is a ratio which measures the frequency of oscillation of $\varphi$, we are interested to investigate on the effectiveness of size estimates approach for oscillating Neumann data.

In particular, the numerical simulations have been carried out for the cubic electrical conductor considered before and choosing the following Neumann data: $$\label{eq:3.oscill-Neu-data}
     \left.
         \begin{array}{crl}
             \varphi = & - \cos \frac{n \pi x}{l}  & \qquad \hbox 
{on } z=0, \\
             \varphi = &  \cos \frac{n \pi x}{l}   & \qquad \hbox 
{on } z=l, \\
             \varphi = & 0                                   & \qquad  
\hbox{elsewhere on } \partial \Omega,
         \end{array}
     \right\}
     \quad \hbox{for } n=0, 1, 2.$$

Case $n=0$ has been already discussed at the beginning of this paragraph and corresponds to the simple case in which the gradient of the unperturbed solution $u_0$ does not vanish in $\Omega$.

The two other cases are examples of Neumann data with higher frequency $F[\varphi]$. More precisely, the corresponding solutions $u_0$ have critical lines of equation $$\left\{ x= \frac{l}{n} \left( \frac{1}{2}+i \right),  z= \frac{l}{n} \left( \frac{1}{2}+j \right) \right\}, \quad i,j = 0,..., n-1.$$

The mesh employed is made by $20 \times 20 \times 20$ HC finite elements. The analysis has been focussed on cubic inclusions having volume up to $6 \%$ of the total volume of the specimen and conductivity $k=0.1$ and $k=10$. The numerical results in case $n=1$ and $n=2$ are presented in Figures \[fig:cos\_1\] and \[fig:cos\_2\], respectively. The numerical results show that the lower bound in size estimates, improves as $d_0$ increases, whereas the upper bound of $|D|$ is rather insensitive to the choice
upper bounds deteriorate as the frequency $ F[\varphi]$ given by increases. Since $ F[\varphi]$ is a proportion which measure the frequency of oscillation of $ \varphi$, we are interested to investigate on the potency of size estimates set about for oscillating Neumann data. 

 In especial, the numerical simulations have been carry out for the cubic electrical conductor considered before and choose the following Neumann data: $ $ \label{eq:3.oscill - Neu - data } 
      \left. 
          \begin{array}{crl } 
              \varphi = & - \cos \frac{n \pi x}{l }   & \qquad \hbox 
 { on } z=0, \\ 
              \varphi = &   \cos \frac{n \pi x}{l }    & \qquad \hbox 
 { on } z = lambert, \\ 
              \varphi = & 0                                    & \qquad  
 \hbox{elsewhere on } \partial \Omega, 
          \end{array } 
      \right\ } 
      \quad \hbox{for } n=0, 1, 2.$$ 

 Case $ n=0 $ has been already discussed at the beginning of this paragraph and corresponds to the simple case in which the gradient of the unflurried solution $ u_0 $ does not vanish in $ \Omega$. 

 The two other cases are model of Neumann data with higher frequency $ F[\varphi]$. More precisely, the match solutions $ u_0 $ experience critical lines of equation $ $ \left\ { x= \frac{l}{n } \left (\frac{1}{2}+i \right),   z= \frac{l}{n } \left (\frac{1}{2}+j \right) \right\ }, \quad i, j = 0, ..., n-1.$$ 

 The mesh employed is make by $ 20 \times 20 \times 20 $ HC finite elements. The analysis has been focussed on cubic inclusions having volume up to $ 6 \%$ of the entire volume of the specimen and conductivity $ k=0.1 $ and $ k=10$. The numerical results in case $ n=1 $ and $ n=2 $ are presented in Figures \[fig: cos\_1\ ] and \[fig: cos\_2\ ], respectively. The numerical results show that the lower bound in size estimate, improves as $ d_0 $ increases, whereas the upper tie down of $ |D|$ is preferably insensitive to the choice
 upoer bounds deteriorate ar the frequency $F[\varphm]$ given by incrdases. Since $F[\varphi]$ is a ratmo wyich neasures the frequency of oscilpation od $\vacphi$, we are intecssted to inveabigatz in the effectiyeness of shze estimates dporlach for oscillating Neumann data.

In particilwr, the numericwl spmtlatjons have been carried out for the cubic tlectrical conductpr considered before and cjooslng the following Jeumann datq: $$\lafwl{eq:3.oscill-Nej-data}
     \left.
         \begin{array}{crl}
             \varpfi = & - \cos \frac{n \pu x}{p}  & \qquad \hbix 
{on } z=0, \\
             \var[hi = &  \vos \frac{n \pi x}{k}   & \qwuad \hbox 
{on } z=l, \\
             \varphi = & 0                                   & \qqudd  
\fvox{dlstwhxre on } \pwrtmal \Omega,
         \end{aeray}
     \right\}
     \auwe \hbox{for } n=0, 1, 2.$$

Case $g=0$ ras been already discussed at the begintinf of this paragraph and corresponds to the slmple casq in which the gradient of the unperturbed solutimn $u_0$ vods uit vavusj in $\Omega$.

The two other cases are examples of Heimsnn data with migher frequency $F[\fagpny]$. More precisgly, the codresponding solutilns $u_0$ hwve ceitical lynes of equation $$\left\{ x= \frac{l}{n} \oeft( \frac{1}{2}+i \rpght),  z= \frac{l}{n} \left( \frcc{1}{2}+j \right) \riyht\}, \qusd i,j = 0,..., n-1.$$

The mesh employed ir mase by $20 \timed 20 \times 20$ FC finite elemengs. Nhe dnalysis has been focussed on cubic inckusions havong vojume up to $6 \%$ of the total volume ov the s[ecimen anf conductivity $k=0.1$ and $k=10$. The numecmcal results on cave $n=1$ and $n=2$ arc presented in Sigures \[fig:cos\_1\] and \[fiy:cos\_2\], rdspectivelj. The numxrical resules show that dje lower bouid in sizq esrimares, impfuves as $d_0$ incrrases, whegecs the upper bound of $|D|$ is vathet jnsensitive to cke choice
upper bounds deteriorate as the frequency $F[\varphi]$ increases. $F[\varphi]$ is ratio which measures $\varphi$, are interested to on the effectiveness size estimates approach for oscillating Neumann In particular, the numerical simulations have been carried out for the cubic electrical considered before and choosing the following Neumann data: $$\label{eq:3.oscill-Neu-data} \left. \begin{array}{crl} \varphi = - \frac{n x}{l} \qquad \hbox {on } z=0, \\ \varphi = & \cos \frac{n \pi x}{l} & \qquad \hbox } z=l, \\ \varphi = & 0 & \hbox{elsewhere on } \partial \end{array} \right\} \quad \hbox{for } 1, Case $n=0$ been discussed the beginning of paragraph and corresponds to the simple case in which the gradient of the unperturbed solution $u_0$ does vanish in two other are of data with higher More precisely, the corresponding solutions $u_0$ of equation $$\left\{ x= \frac{l}{n} \left( \frac{1}{2}+i \right), \frac{l}{n} \left( \right) \right\}, \quad i,j = 0,..., The mesh employed is made by $20 \times \times 20$ HC finite elements. The analysis has been focussed on cubic inclusions having volume $6 \%$ of the volume of the and $k=0.1$ $k=10$. numerical results case $n=1$ and $n=2$ are presented in Figures \[fig:cos\_1\] and \[fig:cos\_2\], The numerical results show that the lower bound in size as increases, whereas the bound of $|D|$ is insensitive the choice
 upper bounds deteriorate as tHe frequencY $F[\varPhi]$ GivEn By inCreaSes. Since $F[\varphI]$ Is a rAtio which measures the frEquenCy OF oscILlAtion Of $\varphI$, We ARE inTeReSteD tO InVestiGatE on the eFfectiveneSs oF sIze estimates APpRoach for osCilLating NeumanN daTa.

In paRtIcuLAr, the NumEricaL simulATions hAve been caRrIEd out fOR the cubIC ElEctrIcal conductor consIDeREd before and choOsing tHe FOlLOWinG NeUmann data: $$\lAbEl{eq:3.oSCill-Neu-DAtA}
     \LEFt.
         \bEGin{array}{crl}
             \vaRphi = & - \cos \frac{N \Pi x}{L}  & \qquad \HbOx 
{oN } Z=0, \\
             \varphI = &  \cos \fRaC{N \pi X}{l}   & \qquad \hbox 
{On } z=l, \\
             \Varphi = & 0                                   & \qquAd  
\hbox{ELsewherE On } \partiAl \OmegA,
         \enD{arRay}
     \rIGhT\}
     \qUad \HbOX{foR } N=0, 1, 2.$$

CAse $N=0$ Has Been alreAdY dIscusSed aT THE BegiNniNg of This pAragraph and coRreSponDS to The siMple cAse iN wHich tHe gradIent oF tHe unperturbed soLutiOn $u_0$ does noT vaNiSh iN $\OMega$.

THE two otHer CasEs are exAmples oF neuMaNN DAtA with higher frequenCy $f[\VArPhi]$. More pReciseLY, tHe COrresponDiNg sOlutIONs $u_0$ haVe crITiCal lines Of equaTIoN $$\lEft\{ x= \fraC{l}{N} \left( \fRaC{1}{2}+i \rIghT),  z= \fraC{L}{n} \leFt( \frac{1}{2}+J \right) \riGht\}, \quAD i,j = 0,..., n-1.$$

The mesh empLOyed is made by $20 \tIMeS 20 \TImES 20$ HC fIniTe elements. THe anALysiS has BEeN foCUssed On cubIc INcLUsions having volume uP tO $6 \%$ of the Total Volume of the spEcimen and cONDUctivity $K=0.1$ and $K=10$. thE Numerical resulTs in cAse $n=1$ and $n=2$ arE PresenteD in FiGures \[fig:Cos\_1\] and \[fig:COS\_2\], respectIveLy. THe nUmeRICaL results show tHAT the LoWer bounD in Size estImaTes, ImpRovEs As $d_0$ increaSes, whereAs ThE uPpEr bOund oF $|d|$ is ratheR iNseNsItiVe to tHE choicE
 upper bounds deteriorateas the fre quenc y $ F[\ va rphi ]$ g iven by increa s es.Since $F[\varphi]$ isa rat io whic h  m easur es thef re q u enc yof  os ci l la tionof$\varph i$, we are  in te rested to in v es tigate onthe  effectivene ssof siz eest i mates  ap proac h foro scilla ting Neum an n  data. 
In par t i cu lar,  the numerical si m ul a tions have bee n carr ie d  o u t  fo r t he cubic e le ctric a l condu c to r c ons i dered beforeand choosin g  th e foll ow ing Neuman n dat a: $$\ label{eq:3. osci ll-Neu-da ta}
   \left . 
        \be gin {ar ray} { cr l} 
       \ v arp hi = & -  \ co s \fr ac{n \ p i  x}{ l} & \ qquad  \hbox 
{on }  z= 0, \ \ 
          \va rp hi =&  \co s \fr ac {n \pi x}{l}  & \q quad \hbo x {o n }  z =l, \ \ 
          \varp hi = &0                         & \qqua d  
\h b ox {e l sewhereon  }\par t i al \O mega , 
       \end{a r ra y} 
     \ ri ght\}   \qu ad \h b ox{f or } n =0, 1, 2 .$$
C ase $n=0$ hasb een already d i sc u s se d  atthe  beginningof t h is p arag r ap h a n d cor respo nd s  t o  the simple case in  w hich t he gr adient of the  unperturb e d solution  $u_ 0 $d oes not vanish  in $ \Omega$.
T he two o thercases ar e example s of Neuma nndat a w ith h ig her frequency $ F[\v ar phi]$.Mor e preci sel y,the  co rr esponding  solutio ns  $ u_ 0$  ha ve cr i tical li ne s o fequ ation $$\lef t\{ x = \f ra c{ l }{n } \left (  \ f r ac{1 }{ 2} +i \ rig ht ),  z = \f r ac{ l}{n} \ left( \fr ac{ 1 }{2} +j  \ right)\right\}, \qu ad  i,j = 0,. .. , n -1.$$T he meshemployed is made by $20 \times20\time s 20 $ HC fini teelemen ts. The an alysis  hasbe enf o cusse d on  cu bi c inclusio n s  ha vingvo lume  up to$6 \%$ of the tota l  vo lume of the s pec imen a nd  co n du c tiv it y  $k = 0 .1$ and $k=10$.  The numer ic a lresults in cas e$n=1$ a nd $n=2 $ are present ed in Fig ures \[fi g: cos\ _ 1 \]and \[fig: cos\_2\] , respect i vely. Th e num eri cal re su lts  show  thatt helower  bound  i n size  esti ma tes, imp roves as $d_0$ increase s, whe reasthe  upper bo und of$|D|$ israth er insensi tiv e t o the  ch o ice
 upper_bounds deteriorate_as the frequency $F[\varphi]$_given by_increases._Since $F[\varphi]$_is_a ratio which_measures the frequency_of oscillation of $\varphi$,_we are interested_to_investigate on the effectiveness of size estimates approach for oscillating Neumann data.

In particular, the_numerical_simulations have_been_carried_out for the cubic electrical_conductor considered before and choosing_the following_Neumann data: $$\label{eq:3.oscill-Neu-data}
     \left.
__  _    \begin{array}{crl}
    _     _  \varphi_=_&_- \cos \frac{n \pi_x}{l}  & \qquad \hbox 
{on_} z=0, \\
   _      _  \varphi = & _\cos \frac{n \pi x}{l} _ &_\qquad \hbox 
{on } z=l,_\\
  _ _  _     \varphi_= & 0_     __  ___ _  __ __     __      &_\qquad  
\hbox{elsewhere on_}_\partial \Omega,
  _    _ \end{array}
    _\right\}
 _ _ \quad \hbox{for } n=0, 1, 2.$$

Case $n=0$ has been already_discussed at the beginning of this_paragraph and corresponds to_the simple_case_in which the_gradient_of the_unperturbed solution $u_0$ does not vanish in_$\Omega$.

The two_other cases are examples of Neumann_data with higher frequency_$F[\varphi]$._More precisely, the corresponding solutions $u_0$_have critical lines of equation $$\left\{_x= \frac{l}{n} \left( \frac{1}{2}+i \right),__z=_\frac{l}{n} \left( \frac{1}{2}+j \right) \right\},_\quad i,j = 0,..., n-1.$$

The mesh_employed is made_by $20 \times 20 \times 20$ HC_finite_elements. The analysis has been focussed_on_cubic inclusions having volume up to_$6_\%$_of the total volume of_the specimen and conductivity $k=0.1$ and_$k=10$. The numerical results in case $n=1$ and $n=2$_are presented in_Figures \[fig:cos\_1\] and \[fig:cos\_2\], respectively._The_numerical_results show that the lower bound in size estimates, improves_as $d_0$_increases, whereas the_upper bound of $|D|$ is rather insensitive to the choice