arkKirkwoodMonroe\] Note that the stationary equation for has the following form $$\label{KirkwoodMonroe}
\rho(x) = z \exp\biggl\{-\int_{{{{\mathbb R}}^d}}\rho(y) \phi(x-y)dy\biggr\}$$ and coincides with the famous Kirkwood–Monroe equation ([@KM1941], see also, e.g., [@GK1976] and references therein, and the recent work [@CP2010]).

Further considerations
----------------------

We have realized the scheme proposed at the end of Subsection \[scalingdescr\]. But let us explain also the rigorous meaning of the equivalence which was background to all our consideration.

Let $C, z, \beta, \alpha_2$ be as in Theorem \[Vlasovscheme\]. Then, for any fixed ${\varepsilon}>0$ we have $1-\exp\{-{\varepsilon}\phi\}\in
L^1({{{{\mathbb R}}^d}})$ and, by [@FKKZ2010 Proposition 3.2], ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$, given by, is a linear operator in ${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ with dense domain ${{\mathcal L}}_{2{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$. Consider the image $\bigl(
{{\hat{L}}}^\ast_{\varepsilon}, D({{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}^\ast)\bigr)$ in ${{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}=R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}}{{\mathcal K}}_C$ under the isometrical isomorphism $R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ of the dual operator $\bigl({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon},
D({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon})\bigr)$ in $({{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C})'$.

We are not able to show that ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$ is a generator of a strongly continuous semigroup in ${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ since a condition like (with ${\varepsilon}^{-1}C$ instead of $C$) cannot be fulfilled uniformly in ${\varepsilon}>0$. But one can do in the following manner.

Let ${{\alpha}}\in({{\alpha}}_2;1)$ and let us consider the space $\mathbb{K}^{{\alpha}}_{\varepsilon}=\overline{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\alpha}}C}}}}^{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}}$. Note that for any $r^{{({\varepsilon})}}\in\
arkKirkwoodMonroe\ ] Note that the stationary equation for has the following form $ $ \label{KirkwoodMonroe } 
 \rho(x) = omega \exp\biggl\{-\int_{{{{\mathbb R}}^d}}\rho(y) \phi(x - y)dy\biggr\}$$ and coincide with the famous Kirkwood – Monroe equation ([ @KM1941 ], visualize besides, e.g., [ @GK1976 ] and references therein, and the recent employment [ @CP2010 ]). 

 Further considerations 
 ---------------------- 

 We have realized the dodge proposed at the end of Subsection   \[scalingdescr\ ]. But lease us explain also the rigorous meaning of the equality which was background to all our consideration. 

 Let $ C, z, \beta, \alpha_2 $ be as in Theorem   \[Vlasovscheme\ ]. Then, for any fixed $ { \varepsilon}>0 $ we suffer $ 1-\exp\{-{\varepsilon}\phi\}\in 
 L^1({{{{\mathbb R}}^d}})$ and, by [ @FKKZ2010 Proposition   3.2 ], $ { { \hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$, given by, is a linear operator in $ { { \mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ with dense knowledge domain $ { { \mathcal L}}_{2{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$. Consider the image $ \bigl (
 { { \hat{L}}}^\ast_{\varepsilon }, D({{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}^\ast)\bigr)$ in $ { { \mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}=R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}}{{\mathcal K}}_C$ under the isometrical isomorphism $ R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ of the double operator $ \bigl({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon }, 
 D({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon})\bigr)$ in $ ({ { \mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C})'$. 

 We are not able to show that $ { { \hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$ is a generator of a strongly continuous semigroup in $ { { \mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ since a condition like (with $ { \varepsilon}^{-1}C$ instead of $ C$) cannot be meet uniformly in $ { \varepsilon}>0$. But one can do in the following manner. 

 Let $ { { \alpha}}\in({{\alpha}}_2;1)$ and let us consider the space $ \mathbb{K}^{{\alpha}}_{\varepsilon}=\overline{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\alpha}}C}}}}^{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}}$. Note that for any $ r^{{({\varepsilon})}}\in\
arkNirkwoodMonroe\] Note that the stationary equatimn for has the following form $$\label{KirkwoovMoneoe}
\rhi(x) = z \exp\biggl\{-\int_{{{{\mathbc R}}^d}}\rho(y) \ihi(x-y)dy\bitgr\}$$ end coincides wivg the famous Ilrkwomv–Monroe equatiok ([@KM1941], see alvo, e.g., [@GK1976] and rafdrznces therein, and the recent work [@CP2010]).

Surther clnsiderations
----------------------

Wg havt rqaliavd the scheme proposed at the ehd of Slbsection \[scalingdrscr\]. But let us explain aldo tje rigorous meaninh of the eqojvajwnce which wxs backgrolud to all oor consideration.

Let $C, z, \beta, \alpfa_2$ be as in Theirwm \[Vpdsovscheme\]. Vhen, fjr any fixed ${\varepsinon}>0$ we nave $1-\exp\{-{\varepsllon}\pii\}\in
O^1({{{{\mathbb R}}^d}})$ and, by [@FKKV2010 Proposition 3.2], ${{\hat{L}}}_{\vatepsilon}$, ghvzn by, is a linear opeearor it ${{\madhcau L}}_{{\vxreksikoh}^{-1}C}$ witj dxnse domain ${{\mathcal L}}_{2{\vqrepsilon}^{-1}C}$. Consider trv image $\bigl(
{{\hzt{L}}}^\ast_{\dawepsilon}, D({{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}^\ast)\bigr)$ in ${{\mathbal I}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}=R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}}{{\nathcal K}}_C$ under the lsometricwl isomorphism $R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ of the dual operator $\tigl({{\het{U}}}'_{\vaxcisilub},
D({{\jat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon})\bigr)$ in $({{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C})'$.

We wde npt able to shoc that ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepxipom}$ is a generatur of c sfrongly continuous semigrjup ib ${{\mathcal L}}_{{\vatepsilon}^{-1}C}$ since a condition like (with ${\vcrepsilon}^{-1}C$ instead of $C$) cannot bz fulfolled uniformly in ${\varepsilou}>0$. But kne can do ln the fomuowing manner.

Let ${{\aliha}}\it({{\alpha}}_2;1)$ and let us consider the spacx $\matkbb{K}^{{\alphx}}_{\vargpsilon}=\jverline{{{\mahhcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\alpha}}C}}}}^{{{\mwthcap N}}_{{\varepsiloj}^{-1}C}}$. Note that for any $r^{{({\varepsiloi})}}\mn\
arkKirkwoodMonroe\] Note that the stationary equation for following $$\label{KirkwoodMonroe} \rho(x) z \exp\biggl\{-\int_{{{{\mathbb R}}^d}}\rho(y) famous equation ([@KM1941], see e.g., [@GK1976] and therein, and the recent work [@CP2010]). considerations ---------------------- We have realized the scheme proposed at the end of Subsection But let us explain also the rigorous meaning of the equivalence which was to our Let z, \beta, \alpha_2$ be as in Theorem \[Vlasovscheme\]. Then, for any fixed ${\varepsilon}>0$ we have $1-\exp\{-{\varepsilon}\phi\}\in R}}^d}})$ and, by [@FKKZ2010 Proposition 3.2], ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$, given is a linear operator ${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ with dense domain L}}_{2{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$. the image {{\hat{L}}}^\ast_{\varepsilon}, in K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}=R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}}{{\mathcal K}}_C$ under isometrical isomorphism $R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ of the dual operator $\bigl({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon}, D({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon})\bigr)$ in $({{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C})'$. We are not able to that ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$ generator of strongly semigroup ${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ since like (with ${\varepsilon}^{-1}C$ instead of $C$) uniformly in ${\varepsilon}>0$. But one can do in following manner. ${{\alpha}}\in({{\alpha}}_2;1)$ and let us consider the $\mathbb{K}^{{\alpha}}_{\varepsilon}=\overline{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\alpha}}C}}}}^{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}}$. Note that for any $r^{{({\varepsilon})}}\in\
arkKirkwoodMonroe\] Note that The stationAry eqUatIon FoR has The fOllowing form $$\laBEl{KiRkwoodMonroe}
\rho(x) = z \exp\biGgl\{-\inT_{{{{\mAThbb r}}^D}}\rHo(y) \phI(x-y)dy\biGGr\}$$ AND coInCiDes WiTH tHe famOus kirkwooD–Monroe equAtiOn ([@kM1941], see also, e.g., [@Gk1976] AnD referenceS thErein, and the rEceNt work [@cP2010]).

furTHer coNsiDeratIons
----------------------

We HAve reaLized the sChEMe propOSed at thE ENd Of SuBsection \[scalingdeSCr\]. bUt let us explain Also thE rIGoROUs mEanIng of the eqUiValenCE which wAS bACKGroUNd to all our conSideration.

LET $C, z, \Beta, \alPhA_2$ be AS in TheOrem \[VLaSOvsCheme\]. Then, foR any Fixed ${\varePsilon}>0$ WE have $1-\exP\{-{\VarepsiLon}\phi\}\In
L^1({{{{\MatHbb R}}^D}})$ AnD, bY [@FKkZ2010 pRopOSiTioN 3.2], ${{\Hat{l}}}_{\varepsiLoN}$, gIven bY, is a LINEAr opEraTor iN ${{\mathCal L}}_{{\varepsiloN}^{-1}C}$ wIth dENse DomaiN ${{\mathCal L}}_{2{\VaRepsiLon}^{-1}C}$. CoNsideR tHe image $\bigl(
{{\hat{L}}}^\Ast_{\vArepsilon}, d({{\haT{L}}}_{\VarEpSilon}^\ASt)\bigr)$ In ${{\mAthCal K}}_{{\varEpsilon}^{-1}c}=r_{{\vaRePSILoN}^{-1}}{{\mathcal K}}_C$ under the IsOMEtRical isoMorphiSM $R_{{\VaREpsilon}^{-1}C}$ Of The Dual OPEratoR $\bigL({{\HaT{L}}}'_{\varepsIlon},
D({{\hAT{L}}}'_{\VaRepsiloN})\bIgr)$ in $({{\mAtHcaL L}}_{{\vArepsILon}^{-1}C})'$.

we are nOt able to Show tHAt ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilON}$ is a generator OF a STRoNGly cOntInuous semigRoup IN ${{\matHcal l}}_{{\VaRepSIlon}^{-1}C}$ Since A cONdITion like (with ${\varepsiLoN}^{-1}C$ instEad of $c$) cannot be fulfIlled unifoRMLY in ${\varepSiloN}>0$. buT One can do in the fOllowIng manner.

LET ${{\alpha}}\in({{\Alpha}}_2;1)$ And let us Consider tHE Space $\matHbb{k}^{{\alPha}}_{\VarEPSiLon}=\overline{{{\maTHCal K}}_{{\VaRepsiloN}^{-1}{{{{\alPha}}C}}}}^{{{\matHcaL K}}_{{\vArePsiLoN}^{-1}C}}$. Note thaT for any $r^{{({\VaRePsIlOn})}}\iN\
arkKirkwoodMonroe\] Note t hat the st ation ary  eq ua tion  for  has the follo w ingform $$\label{Kirkwood Monro e} \rho ( x)  = z\exp\bi g gl \ { -\i nt _{ {{{ \m a th bb R} }^d }}\rho( y) \phi(x- y)d y\ biggr\}$$ an d  c oincides w ith  the famousKir kwood– Mo nro e  equa tio n ([@ KM1941 ] , seealso, e.g ., [@GK19 7 6] andr e fe renc es therein, and t h er ecent work [@C P2010] ). 
F u r the r c onsiderati on s
--- - ------- - -- - - - --- - -

We have re alized thes che me pro po sed at the  endof Sub section \[s cali ngdescr\] . Butl et us e x plain a lso th e r igo rous me an ing  o f  th e  e qui v ale nce whic hwa s bac kgro u n d to a llourconsi deration.

Le t $ C, z ,  \b eta,\alph a_2$  b e asin The orem\[ Vlasovscheme\].  The n, for an y f ix ed${ \vare p silon} >0$  we  have $ 1-\exp\ { -{\ va r e p si lon}\phi\}\in
L^1( {{ { { \m athbb R} }^d}}) $  a nd ,  by [@FK KZ 201 0 Pr o p ositi on 3 . 2] , ${{\ha t{L}}} _ {\ va repsilo n} $, giv en  by , i s a l i near  opera tor in $ {{\ma t hcal L}}_{{\va r epsilon}^{-1} C }$ w it h  den sedomain ${{\ math c al L }}_{ 2 {\ var e psilo n}^{- 1} C }$ .  Consider the image  $ \bigl( 
{{\h at{L}}}^\ast_ {\varepsil o n } , D({{\h at{L } }} _ {\varepsilon}^ \ast) \bigr)$ in ${{\math cal K }}_{{\va repsilon} ^ { -1}C}=R_ {{\ var eps ilo n } ^{ -1}}{{\mathca l K}}_ C$  underthe  isomet ric aliso mor ph ism $R_{{ \varepsi lo n} ^{ -1 }C} $ oft he dualop era to r $ \bigl ( {{\hat {L}}} '_{\ va re p sil on},
D( { {\ h a t{L} }} '_ {\va rep si lon}) \big r )$in $({{ \mathcalL}} _ {{\v ar ep silon}^ {-1}C})'$.

W eare not ab le  to  showt h at ${{\h at{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$i s a gen era tor o f astronglycon tinuou s s e migrou p in $ {{\ma th cal L }}_{{ \ v ar eps il on}^{-1}C} $ sin ce aco ndit ion lik e (with ${\varepsi l on} ^{-1}C$ inste adof $ C $ )can n ot befu l fil l e d uniformly in${\varepsi lo n }> 0$. But on e  ca ndo in t he foll owing manner. 

Let ${{ \alpha}}\ in ({{\ a l pha }}_2;1)$ a nd let u s conside r  thes pa ce $\ mat hbb{K} ^{ {\a lpha} }_{\va r eps ilon} =\over li ne{{{\ mathc al  K}}_{{\ varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\al pha}}C }}}}^ {{{ \mathcalK}} _ {{\ varepsilo n}^{ -1}C}}$. N ote  th at fo r a n y $r^ {{({ \ va rep s ilon} )}}\ i n\
arkKirkwoodMonroe\] Note_that the_stationary equation for has_the following_form_$$\label{KirkwoodMonroe}
\rho(x) =_z_\exp\biggl\{-\int_{{{{\mathbb R}}^d}}\rho(y) \phi(x-y)dy\biggr\}$$_and coincides with_the famous Kirkwood–Monroe equation_([@KM1941], see also,_e.g.,_[@GK1976] and references therein, and the recent work [@CP2010]).

Further considerations
----------------------

We have realized the scheme_proposed_at the_end_of_Subsection \[scalingdescr\]. But let us explain_also the rigorous meaning of_the equivalence_which was background to all our consideration.

Let $C,_z,_\beta, \alpha_2$ be_as in Theorem \[Vlasovscheme\]. Then, for any fixed ${\varepsilon}>0$ we_have $1-\exp\{-{\varepsilon}\phi\}\in
L^1({{{{\mathbb R}}^d}})$ and, by [@FKKZ2010_Proposition 3.2], ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$, given_by,_is_a linear operator in_${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ with dense domain ${{\mathcal_L}}_{2{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$. Consider the image $\bigl(
{{\hat{L}}}^\ast_{\varepsilon}, D({{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}^\ast)\bigr)$_in ${{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}=R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}}{{\mathcal K}}_C$ under the isometrical_isomorphism $R_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ of the dual operator_$\bigl({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon},
D({{\hat{L}}}'_{\varepsilon})\bigr)$ in $({{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C})'$.

We are_not able_to show that ${{\hat{L}}}_{\varepsilon}$ is_a generator of_a strongly_continuous semigroup in_${{\mathcal L}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}$ since a condition like_(with ${\varepsilon}^{-1}C$ instead_of $C$) cannot be fulfilled uniformly_in_${\varepsilon}>0$. But one_can_do_in the_following manner.

Let ${{\alpha}}\in({{\alpha}}_2;1)$_and_let us_consider_the space $\mathbb{K}^{{\alpha}}_{\varepsilon}=\overline{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}{{{{\alpha}}C}}}}^{{{\mathcal K}}_{{\varepsilon}^{-1}C}}$. Note_that_for any $r^{{({\varepsilon})}}\in\