{1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or $q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{ij}/s)$.

Because $\hat{\bm{n}}$ is a unit vector, we have $$n_i \partial_j n_k = q_{il} \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ By making appropriate contractions of that equation, we can derive the bend vector $$B_k = -n_i \partial_i n_k = -q_{il} \partial_i q_{kl},$$ and the twist pseudoscalar $$T=\epsilon_{ijk} n_i \partial_j n_k =\epsilon_{ijk} q_{il} \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ It is impossible to define the splay scalar $S=\bm\nabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ uniquely in terms of $q_{ij}$, because $S$ is odd in $\hat{\bm{n}}$; i.e., it depends on the arbitrary choice of $\hat{\bm{n}}$ or $-\hat{\bm{n}}$. However, we can uniquely define the splay vector $\bm{S}=S\hat{\bm{n}}$, because it is even in $\hat{\bm{n}}$. The splay vector becomes $$S_i = S n_i = n_i \partial_j n_j = q_{il} \partial_j q_{jl}.$$ Likewise, it is impossible to define the second-rank tensor $\Delta_{ij}$ uniquely in terms of $q_{ij}$, because $\Delta_{ij}$ is also odd in $\hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead, we can define the third-rank tensor $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{ij} n_k = & \frac{1}{2} [n_k \partial_i n_j + n_k \partial_j n_i + n_k n_i B_j + n_k n_j B_i \nonumber\\
&\quad - S n_k (\delta_{ij} - n_i n_j)] \nonumber\\
= & \frac{1}{2} [q_{kl} \partial_i q_{jl} + q_{kl} \partial_j q_{il} + q_{ki} B_j + q_{kj} B_i \nonumber\\
&\quad - S_k (\delta
{ 1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or $ q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{ij}/s)$. 

 Because $ \hat{\bm{n}}$ is a unit vector, we have $ $ n_i \partial_j n_k = q_{il } \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ By making appropriate contractions of that equality, we can deduce the fold vector $ $ B_k = -n_i \partial_i n_k = -q_{il } \partial_i q_{kl},$$ and the twist pseudoscalar $ $ T=\epsilon_{ijk } n_i \partial_j n_k = \epsilon_{ijk } q_{il } \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ It is impossible to specify the splay scalar $ S=\bm\nabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ uniquely in price of $ q_{ij}$, because $ S$ is odd in $ \hat{\bm{n}}$; i.e., it depends on the arbitrary option of $ \hat{\bm{n}}$ or $ -\hat{\bm{n}}$. However, we can uniquely define the splay vector $ \bm{S}=S\hat{\bm{n}}$, because it is even in $ \hat{\bm{n}}$. The splay vector becomes $ $ S_i = S n_i = n_i \partial_j n_j = q_{il } \partial_j q_{jl}.$$ Likewise, it is impossible to specify the second - rank tensor $ \Delta_{ij}$ uniquely in terms of $ q_{ij}$, because $ \Delta_{ij}$ is besides odd in $ \hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead, we can define the third - rank tensor $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \Delta_{ij } n_k = & \frac{1}{2 } [ n_k \partial_i n_j + n_k \partial_j n_i + n_k n_i B_j + n_k n_j B_i \nonumber\\ 
 & \quad - S n_k (\delta_{ij } - n_i n_j) ] \nonumber\\ 
 = & \frac{1}{2 } [ q_{kl } \partial_i q_{jl } + q_{kl } \partial_j q_{il } + q_{ki } B_j + q_{kj } B_i \nonumber\\ 
 & \quad - S_k (\delta
{1}{2}\delha_{ij})$, or $q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{im}/s)$.

Because $\hat{\bm{n}}$ is a uiit vecfor, we hxve $$n_i \partial_j n_k = q_{il} \partmal_j q_{kl}.$$ Vy making appropriate zontractilns of tyat tquation, we can dxdive thc bens veccoc $$B_k = -n_i \partiak_i n_k = -q_{il} \partial_i q_{kl},$$ dna che twist pseudoscalar $$T=\epsilon_{ijk} n_y \partisl_u n_k =\epsilon_{ijh} q_{ik} \parfpao_j q_{kl}.$$ It is impossible to derine tht splay scalar $S=\bm\mabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ uniquely ln tfrms of $q_{ij}$, becausf $S$ is odd un $\hwr{\bm{n}}$; i.e., it ddpends on uhz arbitrary choice of $\hat{\bm{n}}$ or $-\hat{\bm{n}}$. Howdver, ce can uniqozoy fgfine the spoay vvctor $\bm{S}=S\hat{\nk{n}}$, becduse it is even in $\hab{\bm{n}}$. Vhe wplay vector becomes $$V_i = S n_i = n_i \partiwl_j n_j = q_{hl} \partial_j q_{jl}.$$ Likwwuse, ij is hmporwibue uo vefjne thf sxcond-rank tsnsor $\Delta_{uj}$ uniquely in termx jd $q_{ij}$, because $\Delta_{yj}$ is also odd in $\hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead, we can dtfine the third-rank tensor $$\bwgin{aligned}
\Delta_{ij} n_k = & \frac{1}{2} [n_h \partial_i n_j + n_k \partial_j n_i + n_k n_i B_j + n_k n_j B_i \nonujcer\\
&\wuwa - D n_k (\delta_{ij} - n_i n_j)] \nonumber\\
= & \frac{1}{2} [q_{kl} \partiaj_j a_{jk} + q_{kl} \partial_m q_{il} + q_{ki} B_j + q_{kj} B_l \mjnumber\\
&\quad - R_k (\delcz
{1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or $q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{ij}/s)$. Because $\hat{\bm{n}}$ is a we $$n_i \partial_j = q_{il} \partial_j of equation, we can the bend vector = -n_i \partial_i n_k = -q_{il} q_{kl},$$ and the twist pseudoscalar $$T=\epsilon_{ijk} n_i \partial_j n_k =\epsilon_{ijk} q_{il} \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ is impossible to define the splay scalar $S=\bm\nabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ uniquely in terms of because is in i.e., it depends on the arbitrary choice of $\hat{\bm{n}}$ or $-\hat{\bm{n}}$. However, we can uniquely define splay vector $\bm{S}=S\hat{\bm{n}}$, because it is even in The splay vector becomes = S n_i = n_i n_j q_{il} \partial_j Likewise, is to define the tensor $\Delta_{ij}$ uniquely in terms of $q_{ij}$, because $\Delta_{ij}$ is also odd in $\hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead, we can the third-rank \Delta_{ij} n_k & [n_k n_j + n_k + n_k n_i B_j + n_k &\quad - S n_k (\delta_{ij} - n_i n_j)] = & [q_{kl} \partial_i q_{jl} + q_{kl} \partial_j + q_{ki} B_j + q_{kj} B_i \nonumber\\ &\quad S_k (\delta
{1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or $q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{iJ}/s)$.

Because $\hAt{\bm{n}}$ Is a UniT vEctoR, we hAve $$n_i \partial_j n_K = Q_{il} \pArtial_j q_{kl}.$$ By making apprOpriaTe COntrACtIons oF that eqUAtION, we CaN dEriVe THe Bend vEctOr $$B_k = -n_i \pArtial_i n_k = -q_{Il} \pArTial_i q_{kl},$$ and tHE tWist pseudoScaLar $$T=\epsilon_{iJk} n_I \partiAl_J n_k =\EPsiloN_{ijK} q_{il} \pArtial_J Q_{kl}.$$ It iS impossibLe TO definE The splaY SCaLar $S=\Bm\nabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ UNiQUely in terms of $q_{Ij}$, becaUsE $s$ iS ODd iN $\haT{\bm{n}}$; i.e., it dePeNds on THe arbitRArY CHOicE Of $\hat{\bm{n}}$ or $-\hat{\Bm{n}}$. However, wE Can UniqueLy DefINe the sPlay vEcTOr $\bM{S}=S\hat{\bm{n}}$, beCausE it is even In $\hat{\bM{N}}$. The splAY vector BecomeS $$S_i = s n_i = N_i \paRTiAl_J n_j = Q_{iL} \ParTIaL_j q_{JL}.$$ LiKewise, it Is ImPossiBle tO DEFIne tHe sEconD-rank Tensor $\Delta_{ij}$ UniQuelY In tErms oF $q_{ij}$, bEcauSe $\delta_{Ij}$ is alSo odd In $\Hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead, we Can dEfine the tHirD-rAnk TeNsor $$\bEGin{aliGneD}
\DeLta_{ij} n_k = & \Frac{1}{2} [n_k \pARtiAl_I N_J + N_k \Partial_j n_i + n_k n_i B_j + n_k N_j b_I \NoNumber\\
&\quAd - S n_k (\dELtA_{iJ} - N_i n_j)] \nonuMbEr\\
= & \fRac{1}{2} [q_{KL} \PartiAl_i q_{JL} + q_{Kl} \partiaL_j q_{il} + q_{KI} B_J + q_{Kj} B_i \nonUmBer\\
&\quaD - S_K (\deLta
{1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or $q _{ij}=\fra c{1}{ 3}( \de lt a_{i j}+2 Q_{ij}/s)$.

B e caus e $\hat{\bm{n}}$ is aunitve c tor, we  have  $$n_i\ pa r t ial _j  n _k=q _{ il} \ par tial_jq_{kl}.$$Byma king appropr i at e contract ion s of that eq uat ion, w ecan deriv e t he be nd vec t or $$B _k = -n_i  \ p artial _ i n_k = - q_ {il}  \partial_i q_{kl } ,$ $  and the twist  pseud os c al a r  $$ T=\ epsilon_{i jk } n_i \partia l _j n _ k = \ epsilon_{ijk}  q_{il} \pa r tia l_j q_ {k l}. $ $ It i s imp os s ibl e to define  the  splay sc alar $ S =\bm\na b la\cdot \hat{\ bmn}$  uni q ue ly  in  t e rms of  $q _ {ij }$, beca us e$S$ i s od d i n  $\h at{ \bm{ n}}$;  i.e., it dep end s on the  arbi trary  cho ic e of$\hat{ \bm{n }} $ or $-\hat{\bm {n}} $. Howeve r,we  ca nuniqu e ly def ine  th e splay  vector $\b m{ S } = S\ hat{\bm{n}}$, beca us e it  is even  in $\ h at {\ b m{n}}$.Th e s play v ector  bec o me s $$S_i= S n_ i  =  n _i \par ti al_j n _j  =q_{ il} \ p arti al_j q _{jl}.$$  Like w ise, it is imp o ssible to def i ne t he seco nd- rank tensor  $\D e lta_ {ij} $  u niq u ely i n ter ms of $q_{ij}$, because $ \D elta_{ ij}$is also odd i n $\hat{\b m { n }}$. Ins tead ,  w e  can define th e thi rd-rank te n sor $$\b egin{ aligned} 
\Delta_{ i j } n_k =& \ fra c{1 }{2 } [n _k \partial_i n _j +  n _k \par tia l_j n_i  +n_k  n_ i B _j  + n_k n_ j B_i \n on um be r\ \
& \quad - S n_k(\ del ta _{i j} -n _i n_j )] \n onum be r\ \ 
=& \frac { 1} { 2 } [q _{ kl } \p art ia l_i q _{jl }  +q_{kl}\partial_ j q _ {il}  +  q _{ki} B _j + q_{kj} B _i  \nonumber \\ 
&\ quad - S _k (\del ta
{1}{2}\delta_{ij})$, or_$q_{ij}=\frac{1}{3}(\delta_{ij}+2Q_{ij}/s)$.

Because $\hat{\bm{n}}$_is a unit vector,_we have_$$n_i_\partial_j n_k_=_q_{il} \partial_j q_{kl}.$$_By making appropriate_contractions of that equation,_we can derive_the_bend vector $$B_k = -n_i \partial_i n_k = -q_{il} \partial_i q_{kl},$$ and the twist_pseudoscalar_$$T=\epsilon_{ijk} n_i_\partial_j_n_k_=\epsilon_{ijk} q_{il} \partial_j q_{kl}.$$ It_is impossible to define the_splay scalar_$S=\bm\nabla\cdot\hat{\bm n}$ uniquely in terms of $q_{ij}$, because_$S$_is odd in_$\hat{\bm{n}}$; i.e., it depends on the arbitrary choice of_$\hat{\bm{n}}$ or $-\hat{\bm{n}}$. However, we can_uniquely define the_splay_vector_$\bm{S}=S\hat{\bm{n}}$, because it is_even in $\hat{\bm{n}}$. The splay vector_becomes $$S_i = S n_i =_n_i \partial_j n_j = q_{il} \partial_j q_{jl}.$$_Likewise, it is impossible to define_the second-rank tensor $\Delta_{ij}$ uniquely_in terms_of $q_{ij}$, because $\Delta_{ij}$ is_also odd in_$\hat{\bm{n}}$. Instead,_we can define_the third-rank tensor $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{ij} n_k =_& \frac{1}{2} [n_k_\partial_i n_j + n_k \partial_j n_i_+_n_k n_i B_j_+_n_k_n_j B_i_\nonumber\\
&\quad - S_n_k_(\delta_{ij} -_n_i_n_j)] \nonumber\\
= & \frac{1}{2} [q_{kl} \partial_i_q_{jl}_+ q_{kl} \partial_j q_{il} + q_{ki} B_j_+ q_{kj} B_i \nonumber\\
&\quad_-_S_k (\delta