} \right) \right. \\
    \left. + {C_A}{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^3 \left( -\frac{\zeta_3}{16 {\epsilon}^2} - \frac{3 \zeta_4}{32 {\epsilon}} 
    + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16} \right) - \frac{5}{2} {C_A}^2 {({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^2 \zeta_5 \right\} 
    {{\mathbf{T}}_{s-u}^2}{{\mathcal{M}}^{\mathrm{(tree)}}}. \label{eq:m5num}\end{gathered}$$ This result will serve as a consistency check for our computation below.

The soft approximation {#soft}
======================

In section \[chap:bfkl\] we have shown how the two-Reggeon contribution to the two-parton scattering amplitude is conveniently described in terms of the reduced amplitude $\hat {\cal M}$. The latter is defined in [eq. ]{} by (multiplicatively) removing the single-Reggeon effect from the full amplitude ${\cal M}$. This allowed us to use BFKL evolution to express the two-Reggeon contribution to $\hat {\cal M}$ in terms of iterated integrals. Beyond four loops these integrals become difficult to evaluate exactly in $d = 4-2{\epsilon}$ dimensions, but as we are going to show now, this is also not necessary.

Ultimately we are interested in extracting physical information about the scattering process, and dimensional regularization is used in the present context for the sole purpose of regularizing long-distance singularities[^1]. Here infrared factorization come into play: the long-distance singularities of ${\cal M}$ can be factorized, ${\cal M}={\bf Z} 
{\mathcal{H}}$, where the “infrared renormalization” factor ${\bf Z}$ captures all divergences (which famously exponentiate in terms of the soft anomalous dimension, see e.g. [@Sterman:1995fz; @Collins:1989gx; @Korchemskaya:1994qp; @Catani:1998bh; @Aybat:2006mz; @Sterman:2002qn; @Gardi:2009qi; @Becher:2009cu; @Becher:2009qa; @Almelid:2015j
} \right) \right. \\ 
     \left. + { C_A}{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^3 \left (-\frac{\zeta_3}{16 { \epsilon}^2 } - \frac{3 \zeta_4}{32 { \epsilon } } 
     + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16 } \right) - \frac{5}{2 } { C_A}^2 { ({ C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^2 \zeta_5 \right\ } 
     { { \mathbf{T}}_{s - u}^2}{{\mathcal{M}}^{\mathrm{(tree) } } }. \label{eq: m5num}\end{gathered}$$ This result will serve as a consistency check for our computation downstairs. 

 The piano approximation { # soft } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In section \[chap: bfkl\ ] we have prove how the two - Reggeon contribution to the two - parton scattering amplitude is conveniently identify in term of the boil down amplitude $ \hat { \cal M}$. The latter is defined in   [ eq.   ] { } by (multiplicatively) removing the individual - Reggeon effect from the full amplitude   $ { \cal M}$. This admit us to use BFKL evolution to express the two - Reggeon contribution to $ \hat { \cal M}$ in terms of iterated integral. Beyond four loops these integrals become difficult to measure exactly in $ d = 4 - 2{\epsilon}$ dimensions, but as we are going to show nowadays, this is also not necessary. 

 Ultimately we are interested in extracting physical information about the disperse process, and dimensional regularization is used in the present context for the sole purpose of regulate long - distance singularities[^1 ]. Here infrared factorization come into play: the long - distance singularities of $ { \cal M}$ can be factorized, $ { \cal M}={\bf Z } 
 { \mathcal{H}}$, where the “ infrared renormalization ” factor $ { \bf Z}$ captures all divergences (which famously exponentiate in terminus of the soft anomalous dimension, visit for example [ @Sterman:1995fz; @Collins:1989gx; @Korchemskaya:1994qp; @Catani:1998bh; @Aybat:2006mz; @Sterman:2002qn; @Gardi:2009qi; @Becher:2009cu; @Becher:2009qa; @Almelid:2015j
} \rihht) \right. \\
    \left. + {C_A}{({C_A}-{{\oathbf{T}}_t^2})}^3 \left( -\ftax{\zeta_3}{16 {\xpsilon}^2} - \frac{3 \zdta_4}{32 {\epsilon}} 
    + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16} \rmght) - \frax{5}{2} {C_A}^2 {({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^2 \zeta_5 \rkght\} 
    {{\lathbf{T}}_{s-y}^2}{{\matical{M}}^{\mathrm{(tree)}}}. \label{eq:m5kbm}\end{fwthexev}$$ This result wlll serve av a consistencf zhzck for our computation below.

The sofe approcilation {#soft}
======================

In fectpog \[chzi:bnkl\] we have shown how the two-Regfeon coitribution to tne two-parton scattering amolitkde is convenientlj described in ewrms of the feduced amklntude $\hat {\czl M}$. The latter is defined in [eq. ]{} by (mbltiplicaticeoy) ggmoving the winglv-Reggeon effegn from dhe fulk amplitude ${\cal M}$. Vhis allowed us to use BFNL evolution to exkress the dwk-Reggeon contriburiin to $\hat {\cal N}$ iv ttrmx kf itegatxd integrala. Beyond foyr loops these intebrwos become difricult tj evaluate exactly in $d = 4-2{\epsilon}$ dimenspons, but as we are going to show now, this is alsl not necqssary.

Ultimately we are interested in extracting [hysirau iunjfnahion about the scattering process, and dimensijhak gegularization is used in thr orrfent context wor thz skle purpose of regklarizigg lobg-distanct sinbularities[^1]. Here infrared faxtorization bome into play: the lony-distance siugularoties of ${\cal M}$ can be factornzed, ${\czl M}={\bf Z} 
{\mahhcal{H}}$, whsfe the “infrared fenprkalization” factor ${\bf Z}$ capeures all divzrgences (whivh famjusly expojentiate in terms of the soft atomalous dlmension, see e.g. [@Sterman:1995fz; @Colliix:1989gx; @Korchemslafa:1994qi; @Catani:1998bk; @Aybab:2006mz; @Sterman:2002qn; @Gwrdi:2009qi; @Becher:2009co; @Becher:2009qc; @Almeuid:2015j
} \right) \right. \\ \left. + {C_A}{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^3 {\epsilon}^2} \frac{3 \zeta_4}{32 + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16} \zeta_5 {{\mathbf{T}}_{s-u}^2}{{\mathcal{M}}^{\mathrm{(tree)}}}. \label{eq:m5num}\end{gathered}$$ This will serve as consistency check for our computation below. soft approximation {#soft} ====================== In section \[chap:bfkl\] we have shown how the two-Reggeon to the two-parton scattering amplitude is conveniently described in terms of the reduced $\hat M}$. latter defined in [eq. ]{} by (multiplicatively) removing the single-Reggeon effect from the full amplitude ${\cal M}$. allowed us to use BFKL evolution to express two-Reggeon contribution to $\hat M}$ in terms of iterated Beyond loops these become to exactly in $d 4-2{\epsilon}$ dimensions, but as we are going to show now, this is also not necessary. Ultimately we interested in information about scattering and regularization is used present context for the sole purpose singularities[^1]. Here infrared factorization come into play: the singularities of M}$ can be factorized, ${\cal M}={\bf {\mathcal{H}}$, where the “infrared renormalization” factor ${\bf Z}$ all divergences (which famously exponentiate in terms of the soft anomalous dimension, see e.g. [@Sterman:1995fz; @Catani:1998bh; @Aybat:2006mz; @Sterman:2002qn; @Gardi:2009qi; @Becher:2009qa; @Almelid:2015j
} \right) \right. \\
    \left. + {C_A}{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_T^2})}^3 \left( -\frac{\zEta_3}{16 {\epSilOn}^2} - \fRaC{3 \zetA_4}{32 {\epsIlon}} 
    + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16} \riGHt) - \frAc{5}{2} {C_A}^2 {({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^2 \zeta_5 \righT\} 
    {{\mathBf{t}}_{S-u}^2}{{\maTHcAl{M}}^{\maThrm{(treE)}}}. \LaBEL{eq:M5nUm}\End{GaTHeRed}$$ ThIs rEsult wiLl serve as a ConSiStency check fOR oUr computatIon Below.

The soft AppRoximaTiOn {#sOFt}
======================

In sEctIon \[chAp:bfkl\] WE have sHown how thE tWO-ReggeON contriBUTiOn to The two-parton scattERiNG amplitude is coNvenieNtLY dESCriBed In terms of tHe ReducED amplitUDe $\HAT {\Cal m}$. the latter is deFined in [eq. ]{} by (MUltIplicaTiVelY) RemoviNg the SiNGle-reggeon effeCt frOm the full AmplitUDe ${\cal M}$. THIs allowEd us to Use bFKl evoLUtIoN to ExPResS ThE twO-regGeon contRiBuTion tO $\hat {\CAL m}$ In teRms Of itErateD integrals. BeyOnd Four LOopS thesE inteGralS bEcome DifficUlt to EvAluate exactly in $D = 4-2{\epsIlon}$ dimenSioNs, But As We are GOing to ShoW noW, this is Also not NEceSsARY.

ulTimately we are interEsTED iN extractIng phySIcAl INformatiOn AboUt thE SCatteRing PRoCess, and dImensiONaL rEgulariZaTion is UsEd iN thE presENt coNtext fOr the solE purpOSe of regulariziNG long-distance SInGULaRItieS[^1]. HeRe infrared fActoRIzatIon cOMe IntO Play: tHe lonG-dIStANce singularities of ${\cAl m}$ can be FactoRized, ${\cal M}={\bf Z} 
{\mAthcal{H}}$, wheRE THe “infrarEd reNOrMAlization” factoR ${\bf Z}$ cAptures all DIvergencEs (whiCh famousLy exponenTIAte in terMs oF thE soFt aNOMaLous dimension, SEE e.g. [@STeRman:1995fz; @COllIns:1989gx; @KoRchEmsKayA:1994qp; @caTani:1998bh; @AybAt:2006mz; @SterMaN:2002qN; @GArDi:2009qI; @BechER:2009cu; @BecheR:2009qA; @AlMeLid:2015J
} \right) \right. \\
    \ left. + {C _A}{( {C_ A}- {{ \mat hbf{ T}}_t^2})}^3 \ l eft(  -\frac{\zeta_3}{16 {\ epsil on } ^2}-  \ frac{ 3 \zeta _ 4} { 3 2 { \e ps ilo n} }      +  \f rac{253  \zeta_5}{ 16}  \ right) - \fr a c{ 5}{2} {C_A }^2  {({C_A}-{{\ mat hbf{T} }_ t^2 } )}^2\ze ta_5\right \ } 
   {{\mathb f{ T }}_{s- u }^2}{{\ m a th cal{ M}}^{\mathrm{(tre e )} } }. \label{eq:m 5num}\ en d {g a t her ed} $$ This re su lt wi l l serve as a con s istency check  for our co m put ationbe low . 

Thesoftap p rox imation {#s oft} 
======== ====== = ======= 
In sec tion \ [ch ap: bfkl \ ]we  ha ve sho w nhow the  two-Reg ge on  cont ribu t i o n  tothe  two -part on scattering  am plit u deis co nveni entl ydescr ibed i n ter ms  of the reduced  amp litude $\ hat  { \ca lM}$.T he lat ter  is  define d in [e q . ] {} b y  ( multiplicatively)re m o vi ng the s ingle- R eg ge o n effect  f rom  the f ull a mpli t ud e ${\cal  M}$.T hi sallowed  u s to u se  BF KLevolu t ionto exp ress the  two- R eggeon contrib u tion to $\hat {\ c a lM }$ i n t erms of ite rate d  int egra l s.  Be y ond f our l oo p st hese integrals beco me  diffi cultto evaluate e xactly in$ d = 4-2{\e psil o n} $  dimensions, b ut as  we are go i ng to sh ow no w, thisis also n o t  necessa ry. 

U lti mat e l ywe are intere s t ed i nextract ing  physic alinf orm ati on  about th e scatte ri ng  p ro ces s, an d  dimensi on alre gul ariza t ion is  used  inth ep res ent con t ex t forth esole  pu rp ose o f re g ula rizinglong-dist anc e  sin gu la rities[ ^1]. Here inf ra red factor iz ati on com e into pla y: the long-distance si n gularit ies  of $ {\ca l M}$ can  be  facto riz e d, ${\ cal M} ={\bf  Z } { \ mathc a l {H }}$ ,where the“ i nfr aredre norm alizati on” factor ${\bf Z } $ c aptures all d ive rgen c e s(wh i ch fam ou s lye x ponentiate in t erms of th es of t anomalou s  di me nsion,see e.g . [@S t erman:1 995fz; @C ollins:19 89 gx;@ K orc hemskaya:1 994qp; @ Catani:19 9 8bh;@ Ay bat:2 006 mz; @S te rma n:200 2qn; @ G ard i:200 9qi; @ Be cher:2 009cu ;@Becher: 2009qa; @Almelid:2015j
} \right)_\right. \\
_   \left._+ {C_A}{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^3_\left(_-\frac{\zeta_3}{16 {\epsilon}^2}_-_\frac{3 \zeta_4}{32 {\epsilon}}_
  _ + \frac{253 \zeta_5}{16}_\right) - \frac{5}{2}_{C_A}^2_{({C_A}-{{\mathbf{T}}_t^2})}^2 \zeta_5 \right\} 
    {{\mathbf{T}}_{s-u}^2}{{\mathcal{M}}^{\mathrm{(tree)}}}. \label{eq:m5num}\end{gathered}$$ This result will serve as_a_consistency check_for_our_computation below.

The soft approximation {#soft}
======================

In_section \[chap:bfkl\] we have shown_how the_two-Reggeon contribution to the two-parton scattering amplitude is_conveniently_described in terms_of the reduced amplitude $\hat {\cal M}$. The latter_is defined in [eq. ]{} by (multiplicatively) removing_the single-Reggeon effect_from_the_full amplitude ${\cal M}$. This_allowed us to use BFKL evolution_to express the two-Reggeon contribution to_$\hat {\cal M}$ in terms of iterated_integrals. Beyond four loops these integrals_become difficult to evaluate exactly_in $d_= 4-2{\epsilon}$ dimensions, but as_we are going_to show_now, this is_also not necessary.

Ultimately we are interested_in extracting physical_information about the scattering process, and_dimensional_regularization is used_in_the_present context_for the sole_purpose_of regularizing_long-distance_singularities[^1]. Here infrared factorization come into_play:_the long-distance singularities of ${\cal M}$ can_be factorized, ${\cal M}={\bf_Z}_
{\mathcal{H}}$, where the “infrared_renormalization” factor ${\bf Z}$ captures_all divergences (which famously exponentiate in_terms of_the soft_anomalous dimension, see e.g. [@Sterman:1995fz; @Collins:1989gx; @Korchemskaya:1994qp; @Catani:1998bh; @Aybat:2006mz; @Sterman:2002qn; @Gardi:2009qi;_@Becher:2009cu; @Becher:2009qa; @Almelid:2015j