(t)=0$ which leads to the squeezing parameter $r(t)=0$.

In Fig. \[fig2\], the time evolution of the cavity intensity $n(t)$ and the squeezing parameter $r(t)$ are plotted for the different coupling strengths $\eta=\lambda/\lambda_0$. As shown in Fig. \[fig2\] (a), for a weak coupling ($\eta=0.4$), the cavity intensity decays monotonically and eventually approaches to zero, as a result of the Markovian damping dynamics at zero temperature. Also, the small but non-zero squeezing parameter $r(t)$ indicates that the initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ between the system and reservoir induces a small squeezing effect to the cavity field in the beginning. However, the long-time behavior of the squeezing parameter shows that the effect of the initial system-reservoir correlation is washed out in the long-time limit, which is also consistent with the Markovian dynamics. In contrast, by increasing the coupling strength, as depicted in Fig. \[fig2\] (b), the cavity intensity decays rather fast in the beginning and then it revives and damps with oscillation in which some non-Markovian memory effect appears. Interestingly, the squeezing parameter $r(t)$ shows a similar behavior of the non-Markiovan effect, except for the beginning where the initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_1(0)\rangle$ generates a stronger squeezing effect to the cavity field, in comparison with the weak coupling case. When the coupling strength continues increasing to $\eta=2.0$ (the strong non-Markovian regime [@Wu1018407]), the cavity intensity decays faster in the very beginning and then revives and keeps oscillating without damping from then on, see Fig. \[fig2\] (c). In this situation, we find that the initial-correlation-induced squeezing dynamics also oscillates over all the time. Therefore, we can conclude that the initial two-photon correlations $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ can lead to a nontrivial squeezing dynamics of the cavity field, as a consequence of strong non-Markovian memory dynamics, but it is negligible in the steady-state limit in the Markovian regime.

Initially system-reservoir correlated mixed thermal states
----------------------------------------------------------

Next, we investigate the effect of
( t)=0 $ which leads to the squeezing parameter $ r(t)=0$. 

 In Fig.   \[fig2\ ], the time development of the pit saturation $ n(t)$ and the squeezing argument $ r(t)$ are plotted for the unlike coupling strengths $ \eta=\lambda/\lambda_0$. As show in Fig.   \[fig2\ ]   (a), for a decrepit coupling ($ \eta=0.4 $), the pit volume decays monotonically and finally approaches to zero, as a result of the Markovian damping dynamics at zero temperature. besides, the small but non - zero squeezing argument $ r(t)$ indicates that the initial two - photon correlation coefficient $ \langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ between the organization and reservoir induces a small squeezing impression to the cavity field in the beginning. However, the retentive - time demeanor of the squeezing argument shows that the effect of the initial system - reservoir correlation is wash out in the long - time limit, which is also consistent with the Markovian moral force. In line, by increase the coupling strength, as depicted in Fig.   \[fig2\ ]   (b), the cavity intensity decays rather fast in the beginning and then it revives and muffle with oscillation in which some non - Markovian memory effect appear. Interestingly, the squeezing parameter $ r(t)$ shows a similar demeanor of the non - Markiovan effect, except for the beginning where the initial two - photon correlation coefficient $ \langle a(0)b_1(0)\rangle$ generates a stronger squeezing consequence to the cavity field, in comparison with the weak coupling case. When the coupling strength continues increasing to $ \eta=2.0 $ (the strong non - Markovian regime [ @Wu1018407 ]), the pit intensity disintegrate faster in the very beginning and then revives and keeps oscillating without dampen from then on, see Fig.   \[fig2\ ]   (c). In this site, we find that the initial - correlation - induced squeezing moral force also oscillates over all the time. Therefore, we can conclude that the initial two - photon correlation $ \langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ can lead to a nontrivial squeeze dynamics of the cavity field, as a consequence of strong non - Markovian memory moral force, but it is negligible in the steady - state limit in the Markovian regimen. 

 Initially system - reservoir correlate mixed thermal states 
 ---------------------------------------------------------- 

 Next, we investigate the effect of
(t)=0$ wjich leads to the squeezlng parameter $r(t)=0$.

Nb Fig. \[fmg2\], the fime evouution of the cavity intensivy $n(r)$ and the squeezing parametdr $r(t)$ are plotted for rhe differxht coupling sfvengtks $\eta=\lambda/\lambca_0$. As showt in Fig. \[fig2\] (a), fmr a weak coupling ($\eta=0.4$), the cavity intenfity devajs monotonicaljy amq evsntually approaches to zero, as a rssult oh the Markovian damping dynamics at zero hempfrature. Also, the slall but nob-zerj squeezing pxrameter $r(u)$ nndicates tgat the initial two-photon correuatiou $\langle a(0)b_j(0)\rqngpg$ between thx systvm and reservoir induwes a skall squeezing efhect to the cavity field mn the beginning. Howgver, the lmny-time behavior of the swueezhng [araowtef sgoxs fhat tje xffect of tge initial wystem-reservoir cortejqtion is washsd out ig the long-time limit, which is also conspsteht with the Markovian dtnamics. In contrast, bi increasigg the coupling strength, as depicted in Fig. \[fig2\] (b), tve catigy nkbenskry decays rather fast in the beginning and then jt rvvives and damps cith oscillation ij erich some non-Oarkovnzn memory effect appfars. Injerestungly, the squrezing parameter $r(t)$ shows a similar behcviir of the non-Markilvan effect, excgpt fot the beginning where tke inifial two-phohon corremxtion $\langle a(0)b_1(0)\rxngke$ generattr a stronger squeqzing effxct tp the cxviti field, in comparlson with the weak coupllng ccse. Wven the cokpling strength continues increexing to $\eta=2.0$ (jhe stgong non-Mcrkovisn regime [@Wu1018407]), ehe cavity intgnsity deeays fxster in tge very beginning wnd then reviegs and keeps mscillatyng qithiut damokng from then pn, see Fiy. \[yig2\] (c). In tyis situation, we flnd tfzt the initial-cirrtlqtion-induced sauedzigg dbnamisv also oscilnater oxrr alu the time. Bhefefote, we can conclude tvat fhe initial two-phoyok correlajions $\landle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ can lead to a nonurivian sdueezong dynamics of the cavity field, zs a consfqucnce of strond nok-Marhovian mempry dynamics, but it is negligible in thx steady-state limit in rhe Markovian regimg.

Inltially systxm-resewvoir corselated mixed thermao states
----------------------------------------------------------

Next, we ikvestigate the effect kf
(t)=0$ which leads to the squeezing parameter Fig. the time of the cavity parameter are plotted for different coupling strengths As shown in Fig. \[fig2\] (a), a weak coupling ($\eta=0.4$), the cavity intensity decays monotonically and eventually approaches to as a result of the Markovian damping dynamics at zero temperature. Also, the but squeezing $r(t)$ that the initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ between the system and reservoir induces a small squeezing to the cavity field in the beginning. However, long-time behavior of the parameter shows that the effect the system-reservoir correlation washed in long-time limit, which also consistent with the Markovian dynamics. In contrast, by increasing the coupling strength, as depicted in Fig. (b), the decays rather in beginning then it revives with oscillation in which some non-Markovian Interestingly, the squeezing parameter $r(t)$ shows a similar of the effect, except for the beginning where initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_1(0)\rangle$ generates a stronger effect to the cavity field, in comparison with the weak coupling case. When the coupling increasing to $\eta=2.0$ (the non-Markovian regime [@Wu1018407]), cavity decays in very beginning then revives and keeps oscillating without damping from then on, see \[fig2\] (c). In this situation, we find that the initial-correlation-induced also over all the Therefore, we can conclude the two-photon correlations $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ to nontrivial the field, a consequence of strong memory dynamics, but it is in the steady-state limit system-reservoir correlated mixed thermal states ---------------------------------------------------------- Next, we the effect of
(t)=0$ which leads to the squeezing Parameter $r(T)=0$.

In FiG. \[fiG2\], thE tIme eVoluTion of the cavitY InteNsity $n(t)$ and the squeezing ParamEtER $r(t)$ aRE pLotteD for the DIfFERenT cOuPliNg STrEngthS $\etA=\lambda/\Lambda_0$. As shOwn In fig. \[fig2\] (a), for a wEAk Coupling ($\etA=0.4$), thE cavity intenSitY decayS mOnoTOnicaLly And evEntualLY approAches to zeRo, AS a resuLT of the MARKoVian Damping dynamics at ZErO Temperature. AlsO, the smAlL BuT NOn-zEro Squeezing pArAmeteR $R(t)$ indicATeS THAt tHE initial two-phOton correlaTIon $\Langle A(0)b_K(0)\raNGle$ betWeen tHe SYstEm and reservOir iNduces a smAll squEEzing efFEct to thE cavitY fiEld In thE BeGiNniNg. hOweVEr, The LOng-Time behaViOr Of the SqueEZING parAmeTer sHows tHat the effect oF thE iniTIal SysteM-reseRvoiR cOrrelAtion iS washEd Out in the long-timE limIt, which is AlsO cOnsIsTent wITh the MArkOviAn dynamIcs. In coNTraSt, BY INcReasing the coupling StRENgTh, as depiCted in fIg. \[FiG2\] (B), the caviTy IntEnsiTY DecayS ratHEr Fast in thE beginNInG aNd then iT rEvives AnD daMps With oSCillAtion iN which soMe non-mArkovian memory EFfect appears. INTeREStINgly, The Squeezing paRameTEr $r(t)$ ShowS A sImiLAr behAvior Of THe NOn-Markiovan effect, exCePt for tHe begInning where thE initial twO-PHOton corrElatIOn $\LAngle a(0)b_1(0)\rangle$ gEneraTes a strongER squeeziNg effEct to the Cavity fieLD, In comparIsoN wiTh tHe wEAK cOupling case. WhEN The cOuPling stRenGth contInuEs iNcrEasInG to $\eta=2.0$ (the Strong noN-MArKoViAn rEgime [@wU1018407]), the caviTy IntEnSitY decaYS fasteR in thE verY bEgINniNg and thEN rEVIves AnD kEeps OscIlLatinG witHOut Damping From then oN, seE fig. \[fIg2\] (C). IN this siTuation, we find ThAt the initiAl-CorRelatiON-Induced sQueezing dynamics also oscILlates oVer All thE timE. ThereforE, we Can conCluDE that tHe initIal twO-pHotON CorreLATiOns $\LaNgle a(0)b_k(0)\ranGLE$ caN lead To A nonTrivial Squeezing dynamics oF The Cavity field, as A coNseqUENcE of STrONg nOn-mArkOVIan memory dynamiCs, but it is nEgLIgIble in the sTEadY-sTate limIt in the markoVIan regiMe.

InitialLy system-rEsErvoIR CorRelated mixEd thermaL states
----------------------------------------------------------

NeXT, we inVEsTigatE thE effecT oF
(t)=0$ which leads to thesqueezingparam ete r $ r( t)=0 $.
In Fig. \[fig2 \ ], t he time evolution of t he ca vi t y in t en sity$n(t)$a nd t hesq ue ezi ng pa ramet er$r(t)$are plotte d f or  the differe n tcoupling s tre ngths $\eta= \la mbda/\ la mbd a _0$.Asshown  in Fi g . \[fi g2\] (a),  f o r a we a k coupl i n g($\e ta=0.4$), the cav i ty intensity deca ys mon ot o ni c a lly  an d eventual ly  appr o aches t o  z e r o , a s  a result ofthe Markovi a n d amping  d yna m ics at  zero  t e mpe rature. Als o, t he smallbut no n -zero s q ueezing  param ete r $ r(t) $  i nd ica te s  th a tthe ini tial two -p ho ton c orre l a t i on $ \la ngle  a(0) b_k(0)\rangle $ b etwe e n t he sy stemandre servo ir ind ucesasmall squeezing  eff ect to th e c av ity  f ieldi n thebeg inn ing. Ho wever,t helo n g - ti me behavior of the  s q u ee zing par ameter sh ow s  that th eeff ecto f  theinit i al  system- reserv o ir  c orrelat io n is w as hed  ou t int he l ong-ti me limit , whi c h is also cons i stent with th e  M a r ko v iandyn amics. In c ontr a st,by i n cr eas i ng th e cou pl i ng strength, as depict ed  in Fi g. \[ fig2\] (b), t he cavityi n t ensity d ecay s  r a ther fast in t he be ginning an d  then it  revi ves anddamps wit h oscillat ion  in  wh ich s om e non-Markovi a n  mem or y effec t a ppears.  In ter est ing ly , the squ eezing p ar am et er  $r (t)$s hows a s im ila rbeh avior of the  non- Mark io va n  ef fect, e x ce p t  for  t he  beg inn in g whe re t h e i nitialtwo-photo n c o rrel at io n $\lan gle a(0)b_1(0 )\ rangle$ ge ne rat es a s t r onger sq ueezing effect to the c a vity fi eld , incomp arison wi ththe we akc ouplin g case . Whe nthe c oupli n g  s tre ng th continu e s  in creas in g to  $\eta= 2.0$ (the strong n o n-M arkovian regi me[@Wu 1 0 18 407 ] ), the  c a vit y intensity decay s faster i nt he  very begi n nin gand the n reviv es an d  keepsoscillati ng withou tdamp i n g f rom then o n, see F ig. \[fig 2 \] (c ) .In th issituat io n,we fi nd tha t  th e ini tial-c or relati on-in du ced sque ezing dynamics also osc illate s ove r a ll the ti me. The refore, w e ca n conclude  th atthe i nit i al tw o-ph o to n c o rrela tion s  $\langle a( 0)b _ k (0 )\rangle$ c a n lea d toa n o ntrivi al s queezing dynamics of the cavityfiel d ,  as  ac onse qu ence of strong  no n- M a rkovianme mory dynami cs, butit is ne gligib le inthe ste a d y- s tate l imit  in  the Mark ovi an regime. 
In i tially  sys te m-rese rvoirc orre l a ted mixed therma l sta t e s
--- - --- ----- -- ------- - ---- ---------- ----------- ------ ---- -

Ne xt, wein vestig ate  t he effecto f
(t)=0$ which_leads to_the squeezing parameter $r(t)=0$.

In_Fig. \[fig2\], the_time_evolution of_the_cavity intensity $n(t)$_and the squeezing_parameter $r(t)$ are plotted_for the different_coupling_strengths $\eta=\lambda/\lambda_0$. As shown in Fig. \[fig2\] (a), for a weak coupling ($\eta=0.4$), the cavity intensity_decays_monotonically and_eventually_approaches_to zero, as a result_of the Markovian damping dynamics_at zero_temperature. Also, the small but non-zero squeezing parameter_$r(t)$_indicates that the_initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ between the system and_reservoir induces a small squeezing effect_to the cavity_field_in_the beginning. However, the_long-time behavior of the squeezing parameter_shows that the effect of the_initial system-reservoir correlation is washed out in_the long-time limit, which is also_consistent with the Markovian dynamics._In contrast,_by increasing the coupling strength,_as depicted in_Fig. \[fig2\] (b), the_cavity intensity decays_rather fast in the beginning and_then it revives_and damps with oscillation in which_some_non-Markovian memory effect_appears._Interestingly,_the squeezing_parameter $r(t)$ shows_a_similar behavior_of_the non-Markiovan effect, except for the_beginning_where the initial two-photon correlation $\langle a(0)b_1(0)\rangle$_generates a stronger squeezing_effect_to the cavity field,_in comparison with the weak_coupling case. When the coupling strength_continues increasing_to $\eta=2.0$_(the strong non-Markovian regime [@Wu1018407]), the cavity intensity decays faster in_the very beginning and then revives_and keeps oscillating without_damping from_then_on, see Fig. \[fig2\] (c)._In_this situation,_we find that the initial-correlation-induced squeezing dynamics_also oscillates_over all the time. Therefore, we_can conclude that the_initial_two-photon correlations $\langle a(0)b_k(0)\rangle$ can lead_to a nontrivial squeezing dynamics of_the cavity field, as a_consequence_of_strong non-Markovian memory dynamics, but_it is negligible in the steady-state_limit in the_Markovian regime.

Initially system-reservoir correlated mixed thermal states
----------------------------------------------------------

Next,_we_investigate the effect of