. Thus we have $\tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})) \neq \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})$.

Let $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})=\displaystyle \sum_i m_i {\mathbf{v}}_i$, where $m_i$ are positive integers and ${\mathbf{v}}_i$ are irreducible effective classes. Obviously we have $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot \omega = 0$ for any $i$. If ${\mathbf{v}}_i = [E]$ or $[F]$, then ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$. And if ${\mathbf{v}}_i \neq [E]$ and $\neq [F]$, then we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) \geq 0$ for any $i$. Here $E$ is irreducible, and moreover, $F$ is irreducible by the assumption. Since $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot ([E]+[F])=0$, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$ for any $i$. Since $[A_0] \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 1$, we see ${\mathbf{v}}_i \neq [A_0]$ for any $i$. Thus we also have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [A_0] \geq 0$. Since $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot [A_0]=0$, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [A_0] = 0$ for any $i$.

Thus, we have $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot {\mathbb{U}}= 0$ for any $i$. Since ${\mathbb{U}}$ is of signature $(1,1)$, we have $({\mathbf{v}}_i)^2 <0$ for any $i$ by the Hodge index theorem. For such ${\mathbf{v}}_i$’s, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i^2 = -2$, and ${\mathbf{v}}_i$’s are nonsingular rational ($\cong {\mathbb{P}}^1$).

Suppose $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) = {\mathcal{F}}$ for some $i$, say $i=1$. Namely, ${\mathbf{v}}_1 = [F]$. Let ${\mathbf{v}}^\prime := \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{
. Thus we have $ \tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v } }) ) \neq \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})$. 

 Let $ \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})=\displaystyle \sum_i m_i { \mathbf{v}}_i$, where $ m_i$ are positive integer and $ { \mathbf{v}}_i$ are irreducible effective class. Obviously we have $ \alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot \omega = 0 $ for any $ i$. If $ { \mathbf{v}}_i = [ E]$ or $ [ F]$, then $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([ E]+[F ]) = 0$. And if $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \neq [ E]$ and $ \neq [ F]$, then we have $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([ E]+[F ]) \geq 0 $ for any $ i$. Here $ E$ is irreducible, and furthermore, $ F$ is irreducible by the assumption. Since $ \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot ([ E]+[F])=0 $, we receive $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([ E]+[F ]) = 0 $ for any $ i$. Since $ [ A_0 ] \cdot ([ E]+[F ]) = 1 $, we see $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \neq [ A_0]$ for any $ i$. Thus we besides give birth $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [ A_0 ] \geq 0$. Since $ \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot [ A_0]=0 $, we have $ { \mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [ A_0 ] = 0 $ for any $ i$. 

 Thus, we have $ \alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot { \mathbb{U}}= 0 $ for any $ i$. Since $ { \mathbb{U}}$ is of signature $ (1,1)$, we get $ ({ \mathbf{v}}_i)^2 < 0 $ for any $ i$ by the Hodge index theorem. For such $ { \mathbf{v}}_i$ ’s, we have $ { \mathbf{v}}_i^2 = -2 $, and $ { \mathbf{v}}_i$ ’s are nonsingular rational ($ \cong { \mathbb{P}}^1 $). 

 Suppose $ \alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) = { \mathcal{F}}$ for some $ i$, say $ i=1$. Namely, $ { \mathbf{v}}_1 = [ F]$. Let $ { \mathbf{v}}^\prime: = \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf {
. Thks we have $\tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbn{v}})) \neq \alpha^{-1}({\mathyd{v}})$.

Let $\elpha^{-1}({\mafhbf{v}})=\disolaystyle \sum_i m_i {\mathbf{v}}_i$, wiere $m_i$ aee positive integers avd ${\mathbf{n}}_i$ are ireedurible effective rmasses. Obviouapy wz iave $\alpha({\mathbn{v}}_i) \cdot \omaga = 0$ for any $h$. Kf ${\mathbf{v}}_i = [E]$ or $[F]$, then ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdoe ([E]+[F]) = 0$. Snf if ${\mathbf{v}}_i \geq [T]$ agd $\nsq [F]$, then we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) \geq 0$ fmr any $i$. Here $E$ is irreducible, and morelver, $F$ is irreducible hy the assunptijb. Since $\alphx^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot ([E]+[F])=0$, we havg ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$ for any $i$. Sknce $[C_0] \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 1$, ww sfg ${\mathbf{v}}_i \nxq [A_0]$ fjr any $i$. Thus we alsm have ${\kathbf{v}}_i \cdot [S_0] \gxq 0$. Wince $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdov [A_0]=0$, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [A_0] = 0$ fkr any $i$.

Thus, we hqvw $\alpva({\madhbf{x}}_u) \caot {\methgb{U}}= 0$ flr eny $i$. Since ${\mathbb{U}}$ is of signature $(1,1)$, we hsvq $({\mathbf{v}}_i)^2 <0$ fod any $y$ fy the Hodge index theorem. For such ${\matvbf{b}}_i$’s, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i^2 = -2$, qnd ${\mathbf{v}}_i$’s are nondingular wational ($\cong {\mathbb{P}}^1$).

Suppose $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) = {\mathcdl{F}}$ fkf simc $i$, rqy $i=1$. Namely, ${\mathbf{v}}_1 = [F]$. Let ${\mathbf{v}}^\prime := \alpha^{-1}({\mwfhnf{
. Thus we have $\tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})) \neq \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})$. \sum_i {\mathbf{v}}_i$, where are positive integers classes. we have $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \omega = 0$ any $i$. If ${\mathbf{v}}_i = [E]$ $[F]$, then ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$. And if ${\mathbf{v}}_i \neq [E]$ and [F]$, then we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) \geq 0$ for any $i$. Here is and $F$ irreducible by the assumption. Since $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot ([E]+[F])=0$, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$ for any Since $[A_0] \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 1$, we see \neq [A_0]$ for any Thus we also have ${\mathbf{v}}_i [A_0] 0$. Since [A_0]=0$, have \cdot [A_0] = for any $i$. Thus, we have $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot {\mathbb{U}}= 0$ for any $i$. Since ${\mathbb{U}}$ is of $(1,1)$, we <0$ for $i$ the index theorem. For we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i^2 = -2$, and rational ($\cong {\mathbb{P}}^1$). Suppose $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) = {\mathcal{F}}$ for $i$, say Namely, ${\mathbf{v}}_1 = [F]$. Let ${\mathbf{v}}^\prime \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{
. Thus we have $\tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})) \Neq \alpha^{-1}({\maThbf{v}})$.

let $\AlpHa^{-1}({\MathBf{v}})=\dIsplaystyle \sum_I M_i {\maThbf{v}}_i$, where $m_i$ are positiVe intEgERs anD ${\MaThbf{v}}_I$ are irrEDuCIBle EfFeCtiVe CLaSses. OBviOusly we Have $\alpha({\mAthBf{V}}_i) \cdot \omega = 0$ fOR aNy $i$. If ${\mathbF{v}}_i = [e]$ or $[F]$, then ${\mathBf{v}}_I \cdot ([E]+[f]) = 0$. ANd iF ${\MathbF{v}}_i \Neq [E]$ aNd $\neq [F]$, THen we hAve ${\mathbf{V}}_i \CDot ([E]+[F]) \gEQ 0$ for any $I$. hErE $E$ is Irreducible, and morEOvER, $F$ is irreduciblE by the AsSUmPTIon. sinCe $\alpha^{-1}({\matHbF{v}})\cdoT ([e]+[F])=0$, we havE ${\MaTHBF{v}}_i \CDot ([E]+[F]) = 0$ for any $i$. SInce $[A_0] \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 1$, WE seE ${\mathbF{v}}_I \neQ [a_0]$ for anY $i$. ThuS wE AlsO have ${\mathbf{V}}_i \cdOt [A_0] \geq 0$. SinCe $\alphA^{-1}({\Mathbf{v}})\CDot [A_0]=0$, we hAve ${\matHbf{V}}_i \cDot [A_0] = 0$ FOr AnY $i$.

THuS, We hAVe $\AlpHA({\maThbf{v}}_i) \cdOt {\MaThbb{U}}= 0$ For aNY $I$. sInce ${\MatHbb{U}}$ Is of sIgnature $(1,1)$, we havE $({\maThbf{V}}_I)^2 <0$ foR any $i$ By the hodgE iNdex tHeorem. for suCh ${\Mathbf{v}}_i$’s, we have ${\MathBf{v}}_i^2 = -2$, and ${\maThbF{v}}_I$’s aRe NonsiNGular rAtiOnaL ($\cong {\maThbb{P}}^1$).

SuPPosE $\aLPHA({\mAthbf{v}}_i) = {\mathcal{F}}$ for SoME $I$, sAy $i=1$. NamelY, ${\mathbF{V}}_1 = [F]$. leT ${\Mathbf{v}}^\pRiMe := \aLpha^{-1}({\MAThbf{
. Thus we have $\tau^*(\al pha^{-1}({ \math bf{ v}} ))  \ne q \a lpha^{-1}({\ma t hbf{ v}})$.

Let $\alpha^{- 1}({\ ma t hbf{ v }} )=\di splayst y le \ sum _i  m _i{\ m at hbf{v }}_ i$, whe re $m_i$ a repo sitive integ e rs  and ${\ma thb f{v}}_i$ are  ir reduci bl e e f fecti veclass es. Ob v iously  we have$\ a lpha({ \ mathbf{ v } }_ i) \ cdot \omega = 0$f or any $i$. If ${ \mathb f{ v }} _ i  =[E] $ or $[F]$ ,then$ {\mathb f {v } } _ i \ c dot ([E]+[F])  = 0$. Andi f $ {\math bf {v} } _i \ne q [E] $a nd$\neq [F]$,  the n we have  ${\ma t hbf{v}} _ i \cdot  ([E]+ [F] ) \ geq0 $fo r a ny $i$ .  H ere $E$  is irre du ci ble,andm o r e over , $ F$ i s irr educible by t heassu m pti on. S ince$\al ph a^{-1 }({\ma thbf{ v} })\cdot ([E]+[F ])=0 $, we hav e $ {\ mat hb f{v}} _ i \cdo t ( [E] +[F]) =  0$ for any  $ i $ .  S ince $[A_0] \cdot([ E ] +[ F]) = 1$ , we s e e${ \ mathbf{v }} _i\neq [ A_0]$  for an y $i$. T hus we al so  have $ {\ mathbf {v }}_ i \ cdot[ A_0]  \geq0$. Sinc e $\a l pha^{-1}({\mat h bf{v}})\cdot[ A_ 0 ] =0 $ , we  ha ve ${\mathb f{v} } _i \ cdot [A _0] = 0$for a ny $i $ .

Thus, we have $\ al pha({\ mathb f{v}}_i) \cdo t {\mathbb { U } }= 0$ fo r an y  $ i $. Since ${\ma thbb{ U}}$ is of signatur e $(1 ,1)$, we  have $({ \ m athbf{v} }_i )^2  <0 $ f o r  a ny $i$ by the H odge  i ndex th eor em. For  su ch${\ mat hb f{v}}_i$’ s, we ha ve  $ {\ ma thb f{v}} _ i^2 = -2 $,  an d${\ mathb f {v}}_i $’s a re n on si n gul ar rati o na l ($\c on g{\ma thb b{ P}}^1 $).Sup pose $\ alpha({\m ath b f{v} }_ i)  = {\ma thcal{F}}$ fo rsome $i$,sa y $ i=1$.N a mely, ${ \mathbf{v}}_1 = [F]$. L e t ${\ma thb f{v}} ^\pr ime := \a lph a^{-1} ({\ m athbf{ 
. Thus_we have_$\tau^*(\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})) \neq \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})$.

Let $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})=\displaystyle_\sum_i m_i_{\mathbf{v}}_i$,_where $m_i$_are_positive integers and_${\mathbf{v}}_i$ are irreducible_effective classes. Obviously we_have $\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot_\omega_= 0$ for any $i$. If ${\mathbf{v}}_i = [E]$ or $[F]$, then ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot_([E]+[F])_= 0$._And_if_${\mathbf{v}}_i \neq [E]$ and $\neq_[F]$, then we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i_\cdot ([E]+[F])_\geq 0$ for any $i$. Here $E$ is_irreducible,_and moreover, $F$_is irreducible by the assumption. Since $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot ([E]+[F])=0$, we_have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot ([E]+[F]) = 0$_for any $i$._Since_$[A_0]_\cdot ([E]+[F]) = 1$,_we see ${\mathbf{v}}_i \neq [A_0]$ for_any $i$. Thus we also have_${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [A_0] \geq 0$. Since $\alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{v}})\cdot_[A_0]=0$, we have ${\mathbf{v}}_i \cdot [A_0]_= 0$ for any $i$.

Thus,_we have_$\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) \cdot {\mathbb{U}}= 0$ for_any $i$. Since_${\mathbb{U}}$ is_of signature $(1,1)$,_we have $({\mathbf{v}}_i)^2 <0$ for any_$i$ by the_Hodge index theorem. For such ${\mathbf{v}}_i$’s,_we_have ${\mathbf{v}}_i^2 =_-2$,_and_${\mathbf{v}}_i$’s are_nonsingular rational ($\cong_{\mathbb{P}}^1$).

Suppose_$\alpha({\mathbf{v}}_i) =_{\mathcal{F}}$_for some $i$, say $i=1$. Namely,_${\mathbf{v}}_1_= [F]$. Let ${\mathbf{v}}^\prime := \alpha^{-1}({\mathbf{