0 \right)$. The margin is intentionally small to ensure that identifying the MMH is non-trivial. Figure \[fig:MMHCon\] illustrates the MDH solutions arising from the method for a decreasing sequence of bandwidths, $h$. Initially the MDH approximately coincides with the optimal MDH with respect to the true density of the Gaussian mixture. As $h$ decreases, the MDH approaches the MMH and for the smallest values of $h$ the two are indistinguishable.

![Convergence of the MDH to the maximum margin hyperplane for a decreasing sequence of bandwidth parameters, $h$.[]{data-label="fig:MMHCon"}](mmh_Gauss.pdf)

for Semi-Supervised Classification
----------------------------------

Denote the set of hyperplanes which correctly classify the labelled data by $F_{\mathrm{LB}}$. Under the assumption that $\exists H(\v, b) \in F_{\mathrm{LB}}\cap F_{\mathrm{CL}}$ with non-zero margin, we can show that, provided the parameter $\gamma$ does not shrink too quickly with $h$, the hyperplane that minimises $\fSL$ converges to the MMH contained in $F_{\mathrm{LB}} \cap
F_{\mathrm{CL}}$, where as before we assume that such an MMH is strictly feasible. To establish this result it is sufficient to show that there exists $h'>0$ such that for all $h \in (0,h^{\prime})$, the optimal hyperplane $H(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h, \eta,L,
\gamma})$ correctly classifies all the labelled examples. If this holds, then $\fSL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}) = \fUL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma})$ for all sufficiently small $h$, and hence Lemma \[lem:ULConv\] can be applied to establish the result. The proof relies on the fact that the penalty terms associated with the known labels in Equation (\[eq:PenalisedSSL\]) are polynomials in $b$. Provided that $\gamma$ is bounded below by a polynomial in $h$, the value of the penalty terms for hyperplanes that do not correctly classify the labelled data dominate the value of
0 \right)$. The margin is intentionally small to ensure that identifying the MMH is non - fiddling. name   \[fig: MMHCon\ ] illustrates the MDH solutions arising from the method acting for a decreasing sequence of bandwidths,   $ h$. Initially the MDH approximately coincide with the optimal MDH with respect to the truthful density of the Gaussian mixture. As   $ h$ decrease, the MDH approaches the MMH and for the smallest value of $ h$ the two are identical. 

! [ Convergence of the MDH to the maximum gross profit hyperplane for a decreasing sequence of bandwidth parameter, $ h$.[]{data - label="fig: MMHCon"}](mmh_Gauss.pdf) 

 for Semi - Supervised Classification 
 ---------------------------------- 

 Denote the set of hyperplanes which correctly classify the labelled datum by $ F_{\mathrm{LB}}$. Under the assumption that $ \exists H(\v, b) \in F_{\mathrm{LB}}\cap F_{\mathrm{CL}}$ with non - zero margin, we can indicate that, provided the argument $ \gamma$ does not shrink besides quickly with $ h$, the hyperplane that minimises   $ \fSL$ converges to the MMH contained in   $ F_{\mathrm{LB } } \cap 
 F_{\mathrm{CL}}$, where as before we assume that such an MMH is rigorously feasible. To establish this result it is sufficient to show that there exists $ h'>0 $ such that for all $ h \in (0,h^{\prime})$, the optimal hyperplane $ H(\v^\star_{h,\eta, L,\gamma }, b^\star_{h, \eta, L, 
 \gamma})$ correctly relegate all the labelled examples. If this holds, then $ \fSL(\v^\star_{h,\eta, L,\gamma }, b^\star_{h,\eta, L,\gamma }) = \fUL(\v^\star_{h,\eta, L,\gamma }, b^\star_{h,\eta, L,\gamma})$ for all sufficiently small   $ h$, and hence Lemma   \[lem: ULConv\ ] can be applied to establish the result. The proof relies on the fact that the punishment terminus associated with the sleep together label in Equation   (\[eq: PenalisedSSL\ ]) are polynomials in   $ b$. Provided that $ \gamma$ is bounded downstairs by a polynomial in $ h$, the value of the penalty terms for hyperplanes that do not correctly classify the labelled datum dominate the value of
0 \rihht)$. The margin is intentlonally small to ensure that jdentifykng the MMH is non-trivial. Fijure \[dig:MMYCon\] illustrates the MAH solutilns arisung hrom the method hkr a degxeasihn seqbeice of bandwidtms, $h$. Initialny the MDH appsobilately coincides with the optimal MQH with rfspect to the jrue cqnsifj if the Gaussian mixture. As $h$ dscreasev, the MDH apptoaches the MMH and for thf smwllest values of $h$ the two arg inqustinguishabue.

![Convergence of the MSH to the maximum margin hyperpuane yor a decreqsung vequence of bandridth paramebvrs, $h$.[]{dada-label="gig:MMHCon"}](mmh_Gamss.pdh)

for Semi-Supervised Classmfication
----------------------------------

Denote the fet of hy[explanes which correctoy clasvify the oabdlltd vatz by $F_{\latirm{LB}}$. Under the assumprion that $\exists H(\v, b) \pm F_{\mathrm{LB}}\czp F_{\maehwm{CL}}$ with non-zero margin, we can show thdt, lrovided the parameter $\tamma$ does not shrink too quichly with $h$, the hyperplane that minimises $\fSL$ convesges vo tht NMH cubtwined in $F_{\mathrm{LB}} \cap
F_{\mathrm{CL}}$, where as beforq wt axsume that sucm an MMH is strictky frwsible. To estxblish thjs result it is suvficienj to syow that uhere exists $h'>0$ such that for all $h \in (0,h^{\prime})$, rhe optimal hyperppane $H(\v^\star_{k,\eta,L,\gsmma}, n^\star_{h, \eta,L,
\gamma})$ correccly clzssifies alp the labsuled examples. If thps hmlds, then $\fSL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamia}, b^\star_{h,\xta,L,\gcmma}) = \fUU(\v^\stsr_{h,\eta,J,\gamma}, b^\stwr_{h,\eta,L,\gamma})$ for all sufvicieutly vmall $h$, and hence Lemma \[lem:ULConv\] can be ap'kied to estanlhsh the resblt. Thc proof relies jn the fact thct the pznalty terms asskciated with the kgown labels it Equation (\[eq:PxnalisedSFL\]) aee pilynomixus in $b$. Providec that $\gamma$ is boubded below by a pokynujial in $h$, the vcuow of the penalyy geris fpr vyperplanes dhat do mot currectly clcsrify the labelled data dmminzte the value of
0 \right)$. The margin is intentionally small that the MMH non-trivial. Figure \[fig:MMHCon\] from method for a sequence of bandwidths, Initially the MDH approximately coincides with optimal MDH with respect to the true density of the Gaussian mixture. As decreases, the MDH approaches the MMH and for the smallest values of $h$ two indistinguishable. of MDH to the maximum margin hyperplane for a decreasing sequence of bandwidth parameters, $h$.[]{data-label="fig:MMHCon"}](mmh_Gauss.pdf) for Semi-Supervised ---------------------------------- Denote the set of hyperplanes which correctly the labelled data by Under the assumption that $\exists b) F_{\mathrm{LB}}\cap F_{\mathrm{CL}}$ non-zero we show that, provided parameter $\gamma$ does not shrink too quickly with $h$, the hyperplane that minimises $\fSL$ converges to the contained in F_{\mathrm{CL}}$, where before assume such an MMH feasible. To establish this result it show that there exists $h'>0$ such that for $h \in the optimal hyperplane $H(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h, \eta,L, correctly classifies all the labelled examples. If this then $\fSL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}) = \fUL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma})$ for all sufficiently small $h$, and hence Lemma \[lem:ULConv\] applied to establish the The proof relies the that penalty associated with known labels in Equation (\[eq:PenalisedSSL\]) are polynomials in $b$. Provided that is bounded below by a polynomial in $h$, the value penalty for hyperplanes that not correctly classify the data the value of
0 \right)$. The margin is intentionAlly small tO ensuRe tHat IdEntiFyinG the MMH is non-trIVial. figure \[fig:MMHCon\] illustrAtes tHe mdH soLUtIons aRising fROm THE meThOd For A dECrEasinG seQuence oF bandwidthS, $h$. INiTially the MDH APpRoximately CoiNcides with thE opTimal MdH WitH RespeCt tO the tRue denSIty of tHe GaussiaN mIXture. AS $H$ decreaSES, tHe MDh approaches the MMH ANd FOr the smallest vAlues oF $h$ THe TWO arE inDistinguisHaBle.

![CoNVergencE Of THE mDH TO the maximum maRgin hyperplANe fOr a decReAsiNG sequeNce of BaNDwiDth parameteRs, $h$.[]{dAta-label="fIg:MMHCON"}](mmh_GauSS.pdf)

for semi-SuPerVisEd ClASsIfIcaTiON
----------------------------------

DeNOtE thE Set Of hyperpLaNeS whicH corRECTLy clAssIfy tHe labElled data by $F_{\mAthRm{LB}}$. uNdeR the aSsumpTion ThAt $\exiSts H(\v, b) \In F_{\maThRm{LB}}\cap F_{\mathrm{Cl}}$ witH non-zero mArgIn, We cAn Show tHAt, provIdeD thE parameTer $\gammA$ DoeS nOT SHrInk too quickly with $h$, ThE HYpErplane tHat minIMiSeS $\FSL$ conveRgEs tO the mmh contAineD In $f_{\mathrm{Lb}} \cap
F_{\mAThRm{cL}}$, where As Before We AssUme That sUCh an mMH is sTrictly fEasibLE. To establish thIS result it is suFFiCIEnT To shOw tHat there exiSts $h'>0$ SUch tHat fOR aLl $h \IN (0,h^{\priMe})$, the OpTImAL hyperplane $H(\v^\star_{h,\eTa,l,\gamma}, B^\star_{H, \eta,L,
\gamma})$ corRectly clasSIFIes all thE labELlED examples. If thiS holdS, then $\fSL(\v^\sTAr_{h,\eta,L,\gAmma}, b^\Star_{h,\eta,l,\gamma}) = \fUL(\V^\STar_{h,\eta,L,\GamMa}, b^\StaR_{h,\eTA,l,\gAmma})$ for all sufFICienTlY small $h$, And Hence LeMma \[Lem:uLCOnv\] CaN be applieD to estabLiSh ThE rEsuLt. The PRoof reliEs On tHe FacT that THe penaLty teRms aSsOcIAteD with thE KnOWN labElS iN EquAtiOn (\[Eq:PenAlisEDSSl\]) are polYnomials iN $b$. PROvidEd ThAt $\gamma$ Is bounded beloW bY a polynomiAl In $h$, The valUE Of the penAlty terms for hyperplanes THat do noT coRrectLy clAssify the LabElled dAta DOminatE the vaLue of
0 \right)$. The margin isintentiona lly s mal l t oensu re t hat identifyin g  the  MMH is non-trivial. F igure  \ [ fig: M MH Con\]  illust r at e s  th eMD H s ol u ti ons a ris ing fro m the meth odfo r a decreasi n gsequence o f b andwidths, $ h$.  Initi al lyt he MD H a pprox imatel y  coinc ides with  t h e opti m al MDHw i th  res pect to the trued en s ity of the Gau ssianmi x tu r e . A s $ h$ decreas es , the MDH app r oa c h e s t h e MMH and for  the smalle s t v aluesof  $h $  the t wo ar ei ndi stinguishab le.
![Conver genceo f the M D H to th e maxi mum  ma rgin hy pe rpl an e  fo r  a  de c rea sing seq ue nc e ofband w i d t h pa ram eter s, $h $.[]{data-lab el= "fig : MMH Con"} ](mmh _Gau ss .pdf) 

forSemi- Su pervised Classi fica tion
---- --- -- --- -- ----- - ------ --- --- --

Den ote the set  o f h yp erplanes which cor re c t ly  classif y thel ab el l ed databy  $F _{\m a t hrm{L B}}$ .  U nder the  assum p ti on  that $ \e xistsH( \v,  b)  \inF _{\m athrm{ LB}}\cap  F_{\ m athrm{CL}}$ wi t h non-zero ma r gi n ,  w e  can  sh ow that, pr ovid e d th e pa r am ete r  $\ga mma$do e sn ot shrink too quick ly  with$h$,the hyperplan e that min i m i ses $\fS L$ c o nv e rges to the MM H con tained in$ F_{\math rm{LB }} \capF_{\mathr m { CL}}$, w her e a s b efo r e  w e assume that s uchan  MMH is  st rictlyfea sib le.  To  e stablishthis res ul tit  i s s uffic i ent to s ho w t ha t t heree xists$h'>0 $ su ch  t h atfor all $h \ in ( 0, h^ {\pr ime }) $, th e op t ima l hyper plane $H( \v^ \ star _{ h, \eta,L, \gamma}, b^\s ta r_{h, \eta ,L ,
\ gamma} ) $  correct ly classifies all the l a belledexa mples . If  this hol ds,  then$\f S L(\v^\ star_{ h,\et a, L,\ g a mma}, b ^\ sta r_ {h,\eta,L, \ g amm a}) =  \ fUL( \v^\sta r_{h,\eta,L,\gamma } , b ^\star_{h,\et a,L ,\ga m m a} )$f or all  s u ffi c i ently small $h$ , and henc eL em ma \[lem:U L Con v\ ] can b e appli ed to establi sh the re sult. The  p roof r eli es on thefact tha t the pen a lty t e rm s ass oci ated w it h t he kn own la b els  in E quatio n(\[eq: Penal is edSSL\])  are polynomials in $b$ . Prov idedtha t $\gamma $ i s  bo unded bel ow b y a polyno mia l i n $h$ , t h e val ue o f  t hep enalt y te r ms for hy p er pla n e sthat do not c o rre ctlycla s sify t he l abelled data domi n ate the valueof
0 \right)$._The margin_is intentionally small to_ensure that_identifying_the MMH_is_non-trivial. Figure \[fig:MMHCon\] illustrates_the MDH solutions_arising from the method_for a decreasing_sequence_of bandwidths, $h$. Initially the MDH approximately coincides with the optimal MDH with respect to_the_true density_of_the_Gaussian mixture. As $h$ decreases, the_MDH approaches the MMH and_for the_smallest values of $h$ the two are indistinguishable.

![Convergence_of_the MDH to_the maximum margin hyperplane for a decreasing sequence of_bandwidth parameters, $h$.[]{data-label="fig:MMHCon"}](mmh_Gauss.pdf)

for Semi-Supervised Classification
----------------------------------

Denote the_set of hyperplanes_which_correctly_classify the labelled data_by $F_{\mathrm{LB}}$. Under the assumption that_$\exists H(\v, b) \in F_{\mathrm{LB}}\cap F_{\mathrm{CL}}$_with non-zero margin, we can show that,_provided the parameter $\gamma$ does not_shrink too quickly with $h$,_the hyperplane_that minimises $\fSL$ converges to the_MMH contained in $F_{\mathrm{LB}}_\cap
F_{\mathrm{CL}}$, where_as before we_assume that such an MMH is_strictly feasible. To_establish this result it is sufficient_to_show that there_exists_$h'>0$_such that_for all $h_\in_(0,h^{\prime})$, the_optimal_hyperplane $H(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h, \eta,L,
\gamma})$ correctly classifies_all_the labelled examples. If this holds, then_$\fSL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}, b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma}) = \fUL(\v^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma},_b^\star_{h,\eta,L,\gamma})$_for all sufficiently small $h$,_and hence Lemma \[lem:ULConv\] can be_applied to establish the result. The_proof relies_on the_fact that the penalty terms associated with the known labels in_Equation (\[eq:PenalisedSSL\]) are polynomials in $b$. Provided that_$\gamma$ is bounded below_by a_polynomial_in $h$, the_value_of the_penalty terms for hyperplanes that do not_correctly classify_the labelled data dominate the value_of