$;

-   the merger fraction is overestimated for $\mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} \leq 0.1$. Even if only a small fraction of galaxies with poor constrains in their $z_{\rm p}$’s are included in the sample, the projection effects become important;

-   the merger fraction is overestimated for $\mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} \geq 0.7$. This behaviour at high `odds` (i.e., in samples with high quality photometric redshifts) suggests that the retained galaxies are a biased sub-sample of the general population under study.

In the analysis above we only accounted for close companions of $i \leq 22.5$ galaxies with $10h^{-1}\ {\rm kpc} \leq r_{\rm p} \leq 30h^{-1}$ kpc, but we can use other values of $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ or searching over different samples. On the one hand, we repeated the study for $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max} = 40$ and 50$h^{-1}$ kpc, finding the same behaviour than for $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max} = 30 h^{-1}$ kpc (Fig. \[fmvsodds\]). The only differences are that the merger fraction increases with the search radius and that the $\mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} = 0.2$ point starts to deviate from the expected value (the search area increases with $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ and more accurate $z_{\rm p}$’s are needed to avoid projection effects). On the other hand, we explored a wide range of $i-$band magnitude selections, from $i \leq 23$ to 20, in the three previous $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ cases. We find again the same behaviour. That reinforces our arguments above and suggests $0.3 \leq \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} \leq 0.6$ as acceptable `odds` limits to select samples for merger fraction studies in ALHAMBRA.

The merger fraction increases with the search radius (Fig. \[fmvsodds\]). However, the merger rate $R_{\rm m}$ (Sect. \[secmr\]) is a physical property of any population and it can not depend on $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$. Thus, the increase in the merger fraction with the search radius is compensated with the increase in the merger time scale [e.g
$; 

 -    the merger fraction is overestimated for $ \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel } \leq 0.1$. Even if only a small fraction of galaxy with hapless constrains in their $ z_{\rm p}$ ’s are included in the sample, the projection impression become important; 

 -    the merger fraction is overvalue for $ \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel } \geq 0.7$. This behavior at high 'odds '(i.e., in sample with high quality photometric red shift) suggests that the retained galaxies are a biased sub - sample distribution of the general population under study. 

 In the psychoanalysis above we only report for near companions of $ i \leq 22.5 $ galaxies with $ 10h^{-1}\ { \rm kpc } \leq r_{\rm p } \leq 30h^{-1}$ kpc, but we can use early values of $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ or searching over unlike samples. On the one handwriting, we repeated the sketch for $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max } = 40 $ and 50$h^{-1}$ kpc, finding the same behaviour than for $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max } = 30 h^{-1}$ kpc (Fig.   \[fmvsodds\ ]). The lone differences are that the merger fraction increases with the search radius and that the $ \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel } = 0.2 $ point starts to deviate from the expected value (the search area increases with $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ and more accurate $ z_{\rm p}$ ’s are needed to avoid projection effects). On the other hand, we explored a wide scope of $ i-$band magnitude selections, from $ i \leq 23 $ to 20, in the three former $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ case. We receive again the same behaviour. That reinforce our arguments above and suggests $ 0.3 \leq \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel } \leq 0.6 $ as acceptable 'odds 'limits to choose samples for merger fraction studies in ALHAMBRA. 

 The merger fraction increases with the search radius (Fig.   \[fmvsodds\ ]). However, the merger rate $ R_{\rm m}$ (Sect.   \[secmr\ ]) is a physical property of any population and it cannot depend on $ r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$. Thus, the addition in the merger fraction with the search spoke is compensated with the increase in the merger time scale [ e.g
$;

-   hhe merger fraction is oyerestimated for $\mathcan{O}_{\rm ssl} \leq 0.1$. Dven if only a small fractioi of galazies with poor constrakns in thvir $z_{\rm p}$’w art included in the sample, bke prkmectimi effects becomg important;

-   the merger fsaztnon is overestimated for $\mathcal{O}_{\rm fel} \geq 0.7$. Hhis behaviour at nygh `kdds` (i.e., in samples with high qualify photmmetric redshofts) suggests that the retwinef galaxies are a blased sub-sanple if the generxl populatpmn under sjudy.

In the analysis above we onlh accpunted for coosf companions of $i \leq 22.5$ galaxicx with $10h^{-1}\ {\rm klc} \leq r_{\rm p} \lcq 30h^{-1}$ npc, but we can use other values of $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ or saaxching over different sqmplev. On the ine hahd, ws repewtev the study for $r_{\rm p}^{\rn max} = 40$ and 50$h^{-1}$ kpc, fonqpmg the same gehavijuw than for $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max} = 30 h^{-1}$ kpc (Fig. \[fmvsogds\]). The only differences aee that the merger frwction insreases with the search radius and that the $\mathcdl{O}_{\rm rel} = 0.2$ oiijt starts to deviate from the expected value (ege svarch area increafes with $r_{\rk o}^{\rk max}$ and more accurcfe $z_{\rm p}$’s are needed to avoyd prijection tffecys). On the other hand, we expoored a wide eange of $i-$band maguitude seleccions, grom $o \leq 23$ to 20, in the three prebious $r_{\rm p}^{\gm max}$ caads. We find again thv sake behaviour. That reinforcqs our arjumencs above and suggefts $0.3 \leq \mwthcal{O}_{\rm sel} \leq 0.6$ as acfeptayle `ogds` limits to select samples for merger fcection studiex hn DLHAMBRA.

Che mevger fraction igcreases with jhe searck radijs (Fig. \[fmvskdds\]). Hoxever, the mewger rate $R_{\rm l}$ (Sect. \[secmr\]) ms a physycal property ow any populatiom and it bau not depwnd on $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$. Thos, the increase iu uhw merger fractoon wieh tie sewsch radius iv coopevxated with the ikcrdase in the merger time vcals [e.g
$; - the merger fraction is overestimated sel} 0.1$. Even only a small constrains their $z_{\rm p}$’s included in the the projection effects become important; - merger fraction is overestimated for $\mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} \geq 0.7$. This behaviour at high (i.e., in samples with high quality photometric redshifts) suggests that the retained galaxies a sub-sample the population under study. In the analysis above we only accounted for close companions of $i \leq galaxies with $10h^{-1}\ {\rm kpc} \leq r_{\rm p} 30h^{-1}$ kpc, but we use other values of $r_{\rm max}$ searching over samples. the hand, we repeated study for $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max} = 40$ and 50$h^{-1}$ kpc, finding the same behaviour than for $r_{\rm max} = kpc (Fig. The differences that the merger with the search radius and that = 0.2$ point starts to deviate from the value (the area increases with $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ more accurate $z_{\rm p}$’s are needed to avoid effects). On the other hand, we explored a wide range of $i-$band magnitude selections, from 23$ to 20, in three previous $r_{\rm max}$ We again same behaviour. reinforces our arguments above and suggests $0.3 \leq \mathcal{O}_{\rm sel} \leq as acceptable `odds` limits to select samples for merger fraction ALHAMBRA. merger fraction increases the search radius (Fig. However, merger rate $R_{\rm m}$ is physical population it not depend on $r_{\rm max}$. Thus, the increase in merger fraction with the the increase in the merger time scale [e.g
$;

-   the merger fraction is overesTimated for $\MathcAl{O}_{\Rm sEl} \Leq 0.1$. EVen iF only a small fraCTion Of galaxies with poor consTrainS iN TheiR $Z_{\rM p}$’s arE includED iN THe sAmPlE, thE pROjEctioN efFects beCome importAnt;

-   ThE merger fractIOn Is overestiMatEd for $\mathcal{o}_{\rm Sel} \geq 0.7$. thIs bEHavioUr aT high `Odds` (i.e., IN samplEs with higH qUAlity pHOtometrIC ReDshiFts) suggests that thE ReTAined galaxies aRe a biaSeD SuB-SAmpLe oF the generaL pOpulaTIon undeR StUDY.

in tHE analysis abovE we only accoUNteD for clOsE coMPanionS of $i \lEq 22.5$ GAlaXies with $10h^{-1}\ {\rm Kpc} \lEq r_{\rm p} \leq 30H^{-1}$ kpc, buT We can usE Other vaLues of $R_{\rm P}^{\rm Max}$ oR SeArChiNg OVer DIfFerENt sAmples. On ThE oNe hanD, we rEPEATed tHe sTudy For $r_{\rM p}^{\rm max} = 40$ and 50$h^{-1}$ kpC, fiNdinG The Same bEhaviOur tHaN for $r_{\Rm p}^{\rm mAx} = 30 h^{-1}$ kpC (FIg. \[fmvsodds\]). The onLy diFferences Are ThAt tHe MergeR FractiOn iNcrEases wiTh the seARch RaDIUS aNd that the $\mathcal{O}_{\rM sEL} = 0.2$ PoInt startS to devIAtE fROm the expEcTed ValuE (THe seaRch aREa IncreaseS with $r_{\RM p}^{\Rm Max}$ and mOrE accurAtE $z_{\rM p}$’s Are neEDed tO avoid ProjectiOn effECts). On the other hANd, we explored a WIdE RAnGE of $i-$BanD magnitude sElecTIons, From $I \LeQ 23$ to 20, IN the tHree pReVIoUS $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ cases. We fiNd Again tHe samE behaviour. ThaT reinforceS OUR argumenTs abOVe ANd suggests $0.3 \leq \mAthcaL{O}_{\rm sel} \leq 0.6$ AS acceptaBle `odDs` limits To select sAMPles for mErgEr fRacTioN STuDies in ALHAMBRa.

tHe meRgEr fractIon IncreasEs wIth The SeaRcH radius (FiG. \[fmvsoddS\]). HOwEvEr, The MergeR Rate $R_{\rm m}$ (seCt. \[sEcMr\]) iS a phySIcal prOpertY of aNy PoPUlaTion and IT cAN Not dEpEnD on $r_{\Rm p}^{\Rm Max}$. ThUs, thE IncRease in The merger FraCTion WiTh The searCh radius is comPeNsated with ThE inCrease IN The mergeR time scale [e.g
$;

-   the merger fractio n is overe stima ted  fo r$\ma thca l{O}_{\rm sel} \leq  0.1$. Even if only asmall  f r acti o nof ga laxiesw it h poo rco nst ra i ns  in t hei r $z_{\ rm p}$’s a rein cluded in th e  s ample, the  pr ojection eff ect s beco me  im p ortan t;
-  the me r ger fr action is  o v eresti m ated fo r $\ math cal{O}_{\rm sel}\ ge q  0.7$. This be haviou ra th i gh`od ds` (i.e.,  i n sam p les wit h  h i g h  qu a lity photomet ric redshif t s)sugges ts  th a t theretai ne d  ga laxies area bi ased sub- sample of theg eneralpopula tio n u nder st ud y.
I n  th e  a nal y sis  above w eon ly ac coun t e d forclo se c ompan ions of $i \l eq22.5 $  ga laxie s wit h $1 0h ^{-1} \ {\rm  kpc}  \ leq r_{\rm p} \ leq30h^{-1}$  kp c,  bu twe ca n  use o the r v alues o f $r_{\ r m p }^ { \ r mmax}$ or searching  o v e rdifferen t samp l es .O n the on ehan d, w e repea tedt he  study f or $r_ { \r mp}^{\rm  m ax} =40 $ a nd50$h^ { -1}$  kpc,findingthe s a me behaviour t h an for $r_{\r m  p } ^ {\ r m ma x}= 30 h^{-1} $ kp c  (Fi g. \ [ fm vso d ds\]) . The  o n ly differences are tha tthe me rgerfraction incr eases with t h e search  rad i us and that the $ \math cal{O}_{\r m  sel} =0.2$point st arts to d e v iate fro m t heexp ect e d  v alue (the sea r c h ar ea  increa ses  with $ r_{ \rm  p} ^{\ rm  max}$ an d more a cc ur at e$z_ {\rmp }$’s are  n eed ed  to  avoi d  proje ction  eff ec ts ) . O n the o t he r hand ,we  exp lor ed  a wi de r a nge  of $i- $band mag nit u de s el ec tions,from $i \leq23 $ to 20, i nthe  three p revious$r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ c a ses. We  fi nd ag ainthe samebeh aviour . T h at rei nforce s our  a rgu m e nts a b o ve  an dsuggests $ 0 . 3 \ leq \ ma thca l{O}_{\ rm sel} \leq 0.6$a s a cceptable `od ds`  lim i t stos el e ctsa m ple s for merger frac tion studi es in  ALHAMBRA. 
Th emergerfractio n inc r eases w ith the s earch rad iu s (F i g . \ [fmvsodds\ ]). Howe ver, them erger ra te $R _{\ rm m}$  ( Sec t. \[ secmr\ ] ) i s a p hysica lproper ty of  a ny popul ation and it can not de pend o n $r_ {\r m p}^{\rm  ma x }$.  Thus, th e in crease inthe  me rgerfra c tionwith th e s e archradi u s is comp e ns ate d wi th the incr e a s e i n the  me r ger ti me s cale [e.g
$;

- _ the_merger fraction is overestimated_for $\mathcal{O}_{\rm_sel}_\leq 0.1$._Even_if only a_small fraction of_galaxies with poor constrains_in their $z_{\rm_p}$’s_are included in the sample, the projection effects become important;

-   the merger_fraction_is overestimated_for_$\mathcal{O}_{\rm_sel} \geq 0.7$. This behaviour_at high `odds` (i.e., in_samples with_high quality photometric redshifts) suggests that the retained_galaxies_are a biased_sub-sample of the general population under study.

In the analysis_above we only accounted for close_companions of $i_\leq_22.5$_galaxies with $10h^{-1}\ {\rm_kpc} \leq r_{\rm p} \leq 30h^{-1}$_kpc, but we can use other_values of $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$ or searching_over different samples. On the one_hand, we repeated the study_for $r_{\rm_p}^{\rm max} = 40$ and_50$h^{-1}$ kpc, finding_the same_behaviour than for_$r_{\rm p}^{\rm max} = 30 h^{-1}$_kpc (Fig. \[fmvsodds\]). The_only differences are that the merger_fraction_increases with the_search_radius_and that_the $\mathcal{O}_{\rm sel}_=_0.2$ point_starts_to deviate from the expected value_(the_search area increases with $r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$_and more accurate $z_{\rm_p}$’s_are needed to avoid_projection effects). On the other_hand, we explored a wide range_of $i-$band_magnitude selections,_from $i \leq 23$ to 20, in the three previous $r_{\rm_p}^{\rm max}$ cases. We find again_the same behaviour. That_reinforces our_arguments_above and suggests_$0.3_\leq \mathcal{O}_{\rm_sel} \leq 0.6$ as acceptable `odds` limits_to select_samples for merger fraction studies in_ALHAMBRA.

The merger fraction increases_with_the search radius (Fig. \[fmvsodds\]). However, the_merger rate $R_{\rm m}$ (Sect. \[secmr\]) is_a physical property of any_population_and_it can not depend on_$r_{\rm p}^{\rm max}$. Thus, the increase_in the merger_fraction with the search radius is compensated_with_the increase in the merger time_scale_[e.g