 spectroscopic redshifts used in our analysis. This provides us with a spectroscopic sampling rate of $\sim24\%$, considering the above mentioned redshift range and magnitude cut. We remind the reader that we use only VUDS and zCOSMOS spectroscopic redshift, and do not include in our sample any other $z_s$ found in the literature.

[**Mean density.**]{} To compute the mean density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ we proceeded as follows. Given that $\Sigma_{VMC}$ has a log-normal distribution [@coles91], in each redshift slice we fitted the distribution of ${\rm log}(\Sigma_{VMC})$ of all pixels with a $3\sigma$-clipped Gaussian. The mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ of this Gaussian are related to the average density $\langle \Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ by the equation $\langle \Sigma_{VMC}\rangle = 10^{\mu}e^{2.652\sigma^{2}}$. We used this $\langle \Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ as the average density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ to compute the density contrast $\delta_{gal}$. $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ was computed in this way in each redshift slice.

[**Overdensity threshold.**]{} In each redshift slice, we fitted the distribution of ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ with a Gaussian, obtaining its $\mu$ and $\sigma$. We call these parameters $\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$, for simplicity, although they refer to the Gaussian fit of the ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ distribution and not of the $\delta_{\rm gal}$ distribution. We then fitted $\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$ as a function of redshift with a second-order polynomial, obtaining $\mu_{\rm \delta,fit}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ at each redshift. Our detection thresholds were then set as a certain number of $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ above the mean overdensity $\mu_{\rm \delta,fit}$, that is, as $ {\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal}) \geq \mu_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm
  slice}) + n_{\sigma}\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm slice})$, where $z_{\rm slice}$ is the central redshift of each slice, and $n_{\
spectroscopic redshifts used in our analysis. This provides us with a spectroscopic sample distribution pace of $ \sim24\%$, view the above mentioned red shift range and order of magnitude cut. We remind the lector that we practice only VUDS and zCOSMOS spectroscopic redshift, and do not include in our sample any other $ z_s$ find in the literature. 

 [ * * Mean concentration. * * ] { } To compute the mean density $ \tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ we proceeded as follows. Given that $ \Sigma_{VMC}$ has a log - normal distribution [ @coles91 ], in each red shift slice we fitted the distribution of $ { \rm log}(\Sigma_{VMC})$ of all pixels with a $ 3\sigma$-clipped Gaussian. The mean $ \mu$ and standard diversion $ \sigma$ of this Gaussian are related to the average density $ \langle \Sigma_{VMC } \rangle$ by the equation $ \langle \Sigma_{VMC}\rangle = 10^{\mu}e^{2.652\sigma^{2}}$. We used this $ \langle \Sigma_{VMC } \rangle$ as the modal density $ \tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ to compute the density contrast $ \delta_{gal}$. $ \tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ was computed in this direction in each redshift slice. 

 [ * * Overdensity threshold. * * ] { } In each redshift slice, we fitted the distribution of $ { \rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ with a Gaussian, obtaining its $ \mu$ and $ \sigma$. We call these parameters $ \mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $ \sigma_{\rm \delta}$, for simplicity, although they refer to the Gaussian fit of the $ { \rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ distribution and not of the $ \delta_{\rm gal}$ distribution. We then fitted $ \mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $ \sigma_{\rm \delta}$ as a function of redshift with a second - order polynomial, obtaining $ \mu_{\rm \delta, fit}$ and $ \sigma_{\rm \delta, fit}$ at each red shift. Our signal detection thresholds were then set as a certain numeral of $ \sigma_{\rm \delta, fit}$ above the mean overdensity $ \mu_{\rm \delta, fit}$, that is, as $ { \rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal }) \geq \mu_{\rm \delta, fit}(z_{\rm 
   slice }) + n_{\sigma}\sigma_{\rm \delta, fit}(z_{\rm slice})$, where $ z_{\rm slice}$ is the central red shift of each slice, and $ n_{\
 spfctroscopic redshifts ustd in our analysis. This 'rovidea us witf a spectroscopic sampling rete if $\sin24\%$, considering the abovd mentionvd redshidt renge and magnituvs cut. Wc remjkd thz ceader that we ose only VUDV and zCOSMOS vpdccroscopic redshift, and do not includq in out dample any othgr $z_s$ souns in the literature.

[**Mean density.**]{} To computt the mean density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ we proceedef as follows. Given thah $\Sigma_{VMC}$ yas w log-normal dkstribution [@coles91], in ezch redshift slice we fitted thd discribution od ${\em pmg}(\Sigma_{VMC})$ if alj pixels witm a $3\sigka$-clipprd Gaussian. Thc meai $\mu$ and standard deviatimn $\sigma$ of this Gwussian ase related to the aceeage genshty $\uqngue \Aijma_{BMC} \rajglx$ by the eqhation $\langoe \Sigma_{VMC}\rangle = 10^{\ku}q^{2.652\wigma^{2}}$. We used this $\jaggle \Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ as the average denvitg $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ to compyte the density contrwst $\delta_{dal}$. $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ was computed in this way in eacv redafifu wlice.

[**Ucegdensity threshold.**]{} In each redshift slice, we sjtued the distributlon of ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\tm gsj})$ with a Gausrian, oyfajning its $\mu$ and $\slgma$. We call these pawameyers $\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$, for spmplucity, although thev refer to tke Gauxsian fit of the ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\xm gal})$ distributiln and nof of the $\delta_{\rm eal}$ dhstribution. We then fitted $\mu_{\rm \delva}$ anb $\sigma_{\ro \dekta}$ as a functioj of vadshift with a seclnd-orber pmlynomial, lbtaining $\mu_{\rm \delta,fit}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ st eabh redshiyt. Our detection thwesholds were jhen set cs a cdrtain numger of $\vigma_{\rm \delea,fit}$ above tvg mean overdeisity $\mu_{\ri \deota,fut}$, that ks, as $ {\rm log}(1+\drlta_{\rm gal}) \geq \mu_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm
  slicc}) + n_{\skfma}\sigma_{\rm \deltc,yiu}(z_{\em slice})$, where $z_{\ro sjibe}$ ms thq central redvhifg ow each slice, and $k_{\
spectroscopic redshifts used in our analysis. This with spectroscopic sampling of $\sim24\%$, considering and cut. We remind reader that we only VUDS and zCOSMOS spectroscopic redshift, do not include in our sample any other $z_s$ found in the literature. density.**]{} To compute the mean density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ we proceeded as follows. Given that has log-normal [@coles91], each redshift slice we fitted the distribution of ${\rm log}(\Sigma_{VMC})$ of all pixels with a $3\sigma$-clipped The mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ of Gaussian are related to average density $\langle \Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ the $\langle \Sigma_{VMC}\rangle 10^{\mu}e^{2.652\sigma^{2}}$. used $\langle \Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ the average density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ to compute the density contrast $\delta_{gal}$. $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ was computed in this way in redshift slice. In each slice, fitted distribution of ${\rm with a Gaussian, obtaining its $\mu$ call these parameters $\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$, simplicity, although refer to the Gaussian fit of ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ distribution and not of the gal}$ distribution. We then fitted $\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$ as a function of redshift second-order polynomial, obtaining $\mu_{\rm and $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ each Our thresholds then set a certain number of $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ above the mean overdensity $\mu_{\rm that is, as $ {\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal}) \geq \mu_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm n_{\sigma}\sigma_{\rm slice})$, where $z_{\rm is the central redshift each and $n_{\
 spectroscopic redshifts useD in our analYsis. THis ProViDes uS witH a spectroscopiC SampLing rate of $\sim24\%$, consideriNg the AbOVe meNTiOned rEdshift RAnGE And MaGnItuDe CUt. we remInd The readEr that we usE onLy vUDS and zCOSMos sPectroscopIc rEdshift, and do Not IncludE iN ouR SamplE anY otheR $z_s$ fouND in the LiteraturE.

[**MEAn densITy.**]{} To comPUTe The mEan density $\tilde{\SiGMa}_{vmC}$ we proceeded aS folloWs. gIvEN ThaT $\SiGma_{VMC}$ has a LoG-normAL distriBUtION [@ColES91], in each redshiFt slice we fiTTed The disTrIbuTIon of ${\rM log}(\SIgMA_{VMc})$ of all pixelS witH a $3\sigma$-clIpped GAUssian. THE mean $\mu$ And staNdaRd dEviaTIoN $\sIgmA$ oF ThiS gaUssIAn aRe relateD tO tHe aveRage DENSIty $\lAngLe \SiGma_{VMc} \rangle$ by the eQuaTion $\LAngLe \SigMa_{VMC}\RangLe = 10^{\Mu}e^{2.652\siGma^{2}}$. We uSed thIs $\Langle \Sigma_{VMC} \rAnglE$ as the aveRagE dEnsItY $\tildE{\sigma}_{VmC}$ tO coMpute thE densitY ConTrAST $\DeLta_{gal}$. $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMc}$ wAS CoMputed in This waY In EaCH redshifT sLicE.

[**OveRDEnsitY thrEShOld.**]{} In eacH redshIFt SlIce, we fiTtEd the dIsTriButIon of ${\RM log}(1+\Delta_{\rM gal})$ with A GausSIan, obtaining itS $\Mu$ and $\sigma$. We cALl THEsE ParaMetErs $\mu_{\rm \deltA}$ and $\SIgma_{\Rm \deLTa}$, For SImpliCity, aLtHOuGH they refer to the GausSiAn fit oF the ${\rM log}(1+\delta_{\rm gaL})$ distributION And not of The $\dELtA_{\Rm gal}$ distributIon. We Then fitted $\MU_{\rm \delta}$ And $\siGma_{\rm \delTa}$ as a funcTIOn of redsHifT wiTh a SecOND-oRder polynomiaL, OBtaiNiNg $\mu_{\rm \dEltA,fit}$ and $\SigMa_{\rM \deLta,FiT}$ at each reDshift. OuR dEtEcTiOn tHreshOLds were tHeN seT aS a cErtaiN Number Of $\sigMa_{\rm \DeLtA,Fit}$ Above thE MeAN OverDeNsIty $\mU_{\rm \DeLta,fiT}$, thaT Is, aS $ {\rm log}(1+\dElta_{\rm gal}) \Geq \MU_{\rm \dElTa,Fit}(z_{\rm
  sLice}) + n_{\sigma}\sigMa_{\Rm \delta,fit}(Z_{\rM slIce})$, wheRE $Z_{\rm slice}$ Is the central redshift of eACh slice, And $N_{\
 spectroscopic redshifts u sed in our  anal ysi s.Th is p rovi des us with as pect roscopic sampling rate  of $ \s i m24\ % $,  cons idering th e abo ve  m ent io n ed  reds hif t range  and magni tud ecut. We remi n dthe reader  th at we use on lyVUDS a nd  zC O SMOSspe ctros copicr edshif t, and do  n o t incl u de in o u r  s ampl e any other $z_s$ fo u nd in the lite rature .[* * M ean  de nsity.**]{ }To co m pute th e  m e a n  de n sity $\tilde{ \Sigma}_{VM C }$we pro ce ede d  as fo llows .G ive n that $\Si gma_ {VMC}$ ha s a lo g -normal distrib ution[@c ole s91] ,  i neac hr eds h if t s l ice  we fitt ed  t he di stri b u t i on o f $ {\rm  log} (\Sigma_{VMC} )$of a l l p ixels  with  a $ 3\ sigma $-clip ped G au ssian. The mean  $\m u$ and st and ar d d ev iatio n  $\sig ma$  of  this G aussian are  r e l a te d to the average d en s i ty  $\langl e \Sig m a_ {V M C} \rang le $ b y th e equat ion$ \l angle \S igma_{ V MC }\ rangle=10^{\m u} e^{ 2.6 52\si g ma^{ 2}}$.We usedthis$ \langle \Sigma _ {VMC} \rangle $  a s th e  ave rag e density $ \til d e{\S igma } _{ VMC } $ tocompu te th e  density contrast $ \d elta_{ gal}$ . $\tilde{\Si gma}_{VMC} $ w as compu tedi nt his way in eac h red shift slic e .

[**Ov erden sity thr eshold.** ] { } In eac h r eds hif t s l i ce , we fitted t h e  dis tr ibution  of  ${\rmlog }(1 +\d elt a_ {\rm gal} )$ withaGa us si an,  obta i ning its  $ \mu $and  $\si g ma$. W e cal l th es ep ara meters$ \m u _ {\rm  \ de lta} $ a nd  $\si gma_ { \rm  \delta }$, for s imp l icit y,  a lthough  they refer t othe Gaussi an  fi t of t h e  ${\rm l og}(1+\delta_{\rm gal}) $  distri but ion a nd n ot of the  $\ delta_ {\r m  gal}$  distr ibuti on . W e thenf i tt ed$\ mu_{\rm \d e l ta} $ and  $ \sig ma_{\rm  \delta}$ as a fun c tio n of redshift  wi th a s ec ond - or d erpo l yno m i al, obtaining $ \mu_{\rm \ de l ta ,fit}$ and $\s ig ma_{\rm  \delta ,fit} $  at eac h redshif t. Our de te ctio n thr esholds we re thenset as ac ertai n  n umber  of  $\sig ma _{\ rm \d elta,f i t}$  abov e theme an ove rdens it y $\mu_{ \rm \delta,fit}$, thatis, as  $ {\ rmlog}(1+\d elt a _{\ rm gal})\geq  \mu_{\rm\de lta ,fit} (z_ { \rm
 sli c e} ) + n_{\s igma } \sigma_{\ r m\de l t a, fit}(z_{\rm s l ice })$,whe r e $z_{ \rmslice}$ is the ce n tral redshiftof e a c h s lic e , an d$n_{\
 spectroscopic_redshifts used_in our analysis. This_provides us_with_a spectroscopic_sampling_rate of $\sim24\%$,_considering the above_mentioned redshift range and_magnitude cut. We_remind_the reader that we use only VUDS and zCOSMOS spectroscopic redshift, and do not_include_in our_sample_any_other $z_s$ found in the_literature.

[**Mean density.**]{} To compute the_mean density_$\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ we proceeded as follows. Given that $\Sigma_{VMC}$_has_a log-normal distribution_[@coles91], in each redshift slice we fitted the distribution_of ${\rm log}(\Sigma_{VMC})$ of all pixels_with a $3\sigma$-clipped_Gaussian._The_mean $\mu$ and standard_deviation $\sigma$ of this Gaussian are_related to the average density $\langle_\Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ by the equation $\langle \Sigma_{VMC}\rangle_= 10^{\mu}e^{2.652\sigma^{2}}$. We used this $\langle_\Sigma_{VMC} \rangle$ as the average_density $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$_to compute the density contrast_$\delta_{gal}$. $\tilde{\Sigma}_{VMC}$ was_computed in_this way in_each redshift slice.

[**Overdensity threshold.**]{} In each_redshift slice, we_fitted the distribution of ${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm_gal})$_with a Gaussian,_obtaining_its_$\mu$ and_$\sigma$. We call_these_parameters $\mu_{\rm_\delta}$_and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$, for simplicity, although_they_refer to the Gaussian fit of the_${\rm log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})$ distribution_and_not of the $\delta_{\rm_gal}$ distribution. We then fitted_$\mu_{\rm \delta}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta}$ as_a function_of redshift_with a second-order polynomial, obtaining $\mu_{\rm \delta,fit}$ and $\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ at_each redshift. Our detection thresholds were_then set as a_certain number_of_$\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}$ above_the_mean overdensity_$\mu_{\rm \delta,fit}$, that is, as $ {\rm_log}(1+\delta_{\rm gal})_\geq \mu_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm
  slice}) +_n_{\sigma}\sigma_{\rm \delta,fit}(z_{\rm slice})$, where_$z_{\rm_slice}$ is the central redshift of_each slice, and $n_{\