 the sequential voting game, voters learn from the previous votes to update their believes on the candidates and the probability that the candidates win the election.

In the investment game, there are multiple projects and investors, where each project has different probability of success and different payoff. One investor may invest one or several projects if his budget allows. If the project succeeds, he receives a payoff from the project. When more investors invest in the same project, the succeeding probability of the project increases, which benefits all investors investing this project. Note that in both voting and investment games, the agent’s decision has a positive effect on ones’ decisions. When one agent makes a decision, the subsequent agents are encouraged to make the same decision in two aspects: the probability that this action has the positive outcome increases due to this agent’s decision, and the potential reward of this action may be significantly large according to the belief of this agent.

The combination of negative network externality with social learning, on the other hand, is difficult to analyze. When the network externality is negative, the game becomes an anti-coordination game, where one agent seeks the strategy that differs from others’ to maximize his own reward. Nevertheless, in such a scenario, the agent’s decision also contains some information about his belief on the uncertain system state, which can be learned by subsequent agents through social learning algorithms. Thus, subsequent agents may then realize that his choice is better than others, and make the same decision with the agent. Since the network externality is negative, the information leaked by the agent’s decision may impair the reward the agent can obtain in the game. Therefore, rational agents should take into account the possible reactions of subsequent players to maximize their own rewards.

The negative network externality plays an important rule in many applications in different research fields, such as spectrum access in cognitive radio, storage service selection in cloud computing, and deal selection on Groupon in online social networking. In spectrum access problem, for instance, secondary users access the same spectrum need to share with each others. The more secondary users access the same channel, the less available access time for each of them. In storage service selection problem, the reliability and availability are affected by the number of subscribers. The more subscribers using the same service, the lower the service quality of the cloud storage platform. For the deal selection on Groupon website, some businesses may receive overwhelming number of customers under the discounted deal. The overwhelming number of customers has a negative network externality on
the sequential voting game, voters determine from the former votes to update their believes on the campaigner and the probability that the candidate win the election. 

 In the investment plot, there are multiple projects and investors, where each undertaking have unlike probability of success and different return. One investor may endow one or several projects if his budget allows. If the project succeeds, he meet a payoff from the project. When more investors induct in the same project, the succeeding probability of the project addition, which benefits all investors investing this project. Note that in both vote and investment games, the agent ’s decision has a positive consequence on ones ’ decisions. When one agent makes a decision, the subsequent agents are encouraged to make the same decision in two aspect: the probability that this action has the incontrovertible consequence increases due to this agentive role ’s decision, and the likely reward of this action may be significantly big according to the belief of this agent. 

 The combination of negative network externality with social learning, on the other hand, is difficult to analyze. When the network outwardness is negative, the plot becomes an anti - coordination game, where one agent seeks the strategy that differs from others ’ to maximize his own wages. Nevertheless, in such a scenario, the agent ’s decision besides contains some data about his belief on the uncertain system state, which can be learned by subsequent agentive role through social learning algorithms. therefore, subsequent agents may then realize that his choice is better than others, and reach the same decisiveness with the agent. Since the network externality is minus, the information leak by the agent ’s decision may impair the reward the agent can obtain in the game. Therefore, rational agent should take into account the potential reactions of subsequent players to maximize their own rewards. 

 The negative network externality plays an authoritative rule in many applications in different research fields, such as spectrum access in cognitive radio, repositing overhaul selection in cloud computing, and deal selection on Groupon in online social networking. In spectrum entree problem, for instance, secondary users access the same spectrum need to share with each others. The more secondary users access the same groove, the less available access time for each of them. In storage service selection problem, the dependability and availability are affected by the number of subscribers. The more subscribers using the same service, the lower the service quality of the cloud storage platform. For the deal selection on Groupon website, some businesses may receive overwhelming issue of customers under the discounted deal. The overwhelming number of customers has a negative net externality on
 thf sequential voting game, voters learn fton the 'revioua votes go update their believes on vhe xandieates and the probabilkty that nhe candieatew win the election.

Ik the lnvescmxnt game, there sre multipne projects ang knrestors, where each project has diffewent prpbwbility of sucsess wnd spfnerent payoff. One investor may ihvest oie or several ptojects if his budget alloas. Iv the project succfeds, he recgjvef a payoff frum the project. When mote investors invest in the same orojeet, the succgzeinh probabilitb of tre project ikbreases, which nenefits all ikvestmrs investing this projert. Note that in both voting atd investment games, tye aggnt’s geciruon haa e pksitivf ehfect on onss’ decisionw. When one agent malef a decision, tge subfezuent agents are encouraged to make the saje decision in two aspexts: the probability tjat this wction has the positive outcome increases due to dhis egdnt’w qdxidion, and the potential reward of this action izy bv significantly lcrge according tp hhr belief of thks ageuf.

Tge combination of jegativg netwirk extergaliyy with social learning, on rhe other haud, us difficult to anclyze. When tke neteork rxternality is negative, the game becomfs an antj-zoordination gamd, wmera one agtvt seeks the straeegy that difyers froo otners’ tj maximize his own reward. Neverthepess, nn suwh a scenagio, the agent’s decision also coivains some ingosmanion abouc his nelief on the ugcertain systek state, whicf can be lvarned by subsequent agents throucj social leacning algjrityms. Rhus, sucrequent agents may then realize tyat his choice is nettet fhan others, and maje the same decosiun rinh vhe adant. Since tha negwofl extdrnality is vegayive, the information leaied by the agent’s cegision mai impair ehe reward thr agent can obtain in tie gamx. Therrfote, rational agents should take jnto accoknt the possiblq reqctions of sbbsequent players to maximize their own cewards.

The negative nejwork externality plais sn importanv rule in many dpplications in diffwrent research fitlds, such as spectrum adcess hn cohnitive radio, storage service selection in cloud computing, and deal selecrion oi Droupon in knlime sobiaj netwowkinj. Mn spectrum accesx problem, for instance, secondarb users acwefs the same spectrum need to sfare with eacf others. The more secondzry userx access the same channel, the lrss available access timc for eacy of fhem. In sturage service selevtion 'roblen, the rwlianility and avaklanipity are wfferteb by the number of subscribers. Thw more skbscribers using the same scryice, tge lowgr the service quzlitg of tfe cloud storsge platform. Fpr the deal selectiot jn Groupon webwpte, some busimesses kay receive pverwhelminc number of customers under the discounted deal. The overwheljing numner of customers nes a negative network exbernajity on
the sequential voting game, voters learn from votes update their on the candidates candidates the election. In investment game, there multiple projects and investors, where each has different probability of success and different payoff. One investor may invest one several projects if his budget allows. If the project succeeds, he receives a from project. more invest in the same project, the succeeding probability of the project increases, which benefits all investors this project. Note that in both voting and games, the agent’s decision a positive effect on ones’ When agent makes decision, subsequent are encouraged to the same decision in two aspects: the probability that this action has the positive outcome increases due this agent’s the potential of action be significantly large the belief of this agent. The network externality with social learning, on the other is difficult analyze. When the network externality is the game becomes an anti-coordination game, where one seeks the strategy that differs from others’ to maximize his own reward. Nevertheless, in such the agent’s decision also some information about belief the system which can learned by subsequent agents through social learning algorithms. Thus, subsequent agents then realize that his choice is better than others, and same with the agent. the network externality is the leaked by the agent’s impair reward obtain the Therefore, rational agents should into account the possible reactions subsequent players to maximize network externality plays an important rule in many in different research fields, such as spectrum in cognitive radio, storage service selection in cloud computing, and deal selection Groupon in networking. In spectrum access problem, for instance, secondary access the same spectrum to share with each others. The more secondary users the channel, the available access time each of them. storage service selection reliability and are by subscribers. The more subscribers using the service, lower the service quality of cloud For the deal selection on Groupon website, some businesses may receive overwhelming number of customers discounted deal. The overwhelming of has a negative network externality on
 the sequential voting game, voTers learn fRom thE prEviOuS votEs to Update their belIEves On the candidates and the pRobabIlITy thAT tHe canDidates WIn THE elEcTiOn.

IN tHE iNvestMenT game, thEre are multIplE pRojects and inVEsTors, where eAch Project has diFfeRent prObAbiLIty of SucCess aNd diffERent paYoff. One inVeSTor may INvest onE OR sEverAl projects if his buDGeT Allows. If the proJect suCcEEdS, HE reCeiVes a payoff FrOm the PRoject. WHEn MORE inVEstors invest iN the same proJEct, The sucCeEdiNG probaBilitY oF The Project incrEaseS, which benEfits aLL investORs invesTing thIs pRojEct. NOTe ThAt iN bOTh vOTiNg aND inVestment GaMeS, the aGent’S DECIsioN haS a poSitivE effect on ones’ DecIsioNS. WhEn one Agent MakeS a DecisIon, the SubseQuEnt agents are encOuraGed to make The SaMe dEcIsion IN two asPecTs: tHe probaBility tHAt tHiS ACTiOn has the positive ouTcOME iNcreases Due to tHIs AgENt’s decisIoN, anD the POTentiAl reWArD of this aCtion mAY bE sIgnificAnTly larGe AccOrdIng to THe beLief of This agenT.

The cOMbination of negATive network exTErNALiTY witH soCial learninG, on tHE othEr haND, iS diFFiculT to anAlYZe. wHen the network externAlIty is nEgatiVe, the game becoMes an anti-cOORDination Game, WHeRE one agent seeks The stRategy that DIffers frOm othErs’ to maxImize his oWN Reward. NeVerTheLesS, in SUCh A scenario, the aGENt’s dEcIsion alSo cOntains SomE inForMatIoN about his Belief on ThE uNcErTaiN systEM state, whIcH caN bE leArned BY subseQuent AgenTs ThROugH social LEaRNIng aLgOrIthmS. ThUs, SubseQuenT AgeNts may tHen realizE thAT his ChOiCe is betTer than others, AnD make the saMe DecIsion wITH the agenT. Since the network externaLIty is neGatIve, thE infOrmation lEakEd by thE agENt’s decIsion mAy impAiR thE REward THE aGenT cAn obtain in THE gaMe. TheReFore, RationaL agents should take iNTo aCcount the possIblE reaCTIoNs oF SuBSeqUeNT plAYErs to maximize thEir own rewaRdS.

thE negative nETwoRk ExternaLity plaYs an iMPortant Rule in manY applicatIoNs in DIFfeRent researCh fields, Such as speCTrum aCCeSs in cOgnItive rAdIo, sToragE serviCE seLectiOn in clOuD compuTing, aNd Deal seleCtion on Groupon in online sOcial nEtworKinG. In spectrUm aCCesS problem, fOr inStance, secoNdaRy uSers aCceSS the sAme sPEcTruM Need tO shaRE with each OThErs. tHE mOre secondarY USErs AccesS thE Same chAnneL, the less available ACcess time for eaCh of THEm. IN stORage SeRvice selection ProBlEM, The reliaBiLity and avaiLability ArE AffecTed by tHe numbEr of subSCRiBErs. The More SubScribers uSinG tHE same seRvIcE, The lowEr thE sErvice QualitY Of thE CLoud storage platfOrm. FoR THe deaL SelEctioN oN GroupoN WebsIte, some busInesses may rEceive OverWhelmIng numbEr Of custOmeRs Under the diSCounted deAl. The OverwheLmIng nUmbEr of cuStomERS has a NegaTiVe nEtwork extERNaLItY oN
 the sequential voting gam e, voterslearn  fr omth e pr evio us votes to up d atetheir believes on thecandi da t es a n dthe p robabil i ty t hat  t he  ca nd i da tes w inthe ele ction.

In  th einvestment g a me , there ar e m ultiple proj ect s andin ves t ors,whe re ea ch pro j ect ha s differe nt probab i lity of s uc cess  and different pa y of f . One investor  may i nv e st o neorseveral pr oj ectsi f his b u dg e t all o ws. If the pr oject succe e ds,  he re ce ive s  a pay off f ro m  th e project.When  more inv estors investi n the s ame pr oje ct,  the su cc eed in g  pr o ba bil i tyof the p ro je ct in crea s e s ,  whi chbene fitsall investors  in vest i ngthisproje ct.No te th at inbothvo ting and invest ment  games, t heag ent ’s  deci s ion ha s a  po sitiveeffecto n o ne s ’ de cisions. When oneag e n tmakes adecisi o n,  t h e subseq ue ntagen t s  areenco u ra ged to m ake th e  s am e decis io n in t wo  as pec ts: t h e pr obabil ity that  this action has the positive outc o me i nc r ease s d ue to thisagen t ’s d ecis i on , a n d the  pote nt i al reward of this acti on  may b e sig nificantly la rge accord i n g  to thebeli e fo f this agent.
Thecombinatio n  of nega tivenetworkexternali t y  with so cia l l ear nin g ,  o n the other h a n d, i sdifficu ltto anal yze . W hen  th enetwork e xternali ty  i sne gat ive,t he gamebe com es  an  anti - coordi natio n ga me ,w her e one a g en t seek sth e st rat eg y tha t di f fer s fromothers’ t o m a ximi ze  h is ownreward. Never th eless, insu cha scen a r io, theagent’s decision also c o ntainssom e inf orma tion abou t h is bel ief on the  uncer tainsy ste m state , wh ich  c an be lear n e d b y sub se quen t agent s through social l e arn ing algorithm s.Thus , su bse q ue n t a ge n tsm a y then realizethat his c ho i ce  is better tha nothers,  and ma ke th e  same d ecision w ith the a ge nt.S i nce  the netwo rk exter nality is negat i ve , the  in format io n l eaked  by th e  ag ent’s  decis io n mayimpai rthe rewa rd the agent can obtain  in th e gam e.Therefore , r a tio nal agent s sh ould takeint o a ccoun t t h e pos sibl e  r eac t ionsof s u bsequentp la yer s to  maximize t h e i r o wn re war d s.

Th e ne gative network ex t ernality plays  ani m por tan t  rul ein many applic ati on s in diffe re nt research  fields,  s u ch as  spect rum ac cess in c og n itiveradi o,storage s erv ic e  select io ni n clou d co mp uting,  and d e al s e l ection on Groupo n ino n lines oci al ne tw orking. In s pectrum ac cess proble m, for  ins tance , secon da ry use rsac cess the s a me spectr um ne ed to s ha re w ith  eachothe r s . The  mor esec ondary us e r sa cc es s  th e sa me ch an nel,  the less availabl e a c cess ti me  fo r each o f  t h e m. In stor age  serv i c e selectio n  pro b le m , the  relia bility  and av a ila bi lity ar e a f f ected bythe numbe r  of  s ubsc ribers.Th e mo re  su bs cribers using t he sameservice, t he low ert he s e rvicequ ality of the  clou ds toragep l atf orm. Fo r  th e d eal  sel ect iono n Groupon website, somebusi nesse s  ma y rec eiveov erwhelmi n g nu mber ofc ustomers unde r the discounte d  de a l. T heo ve rw helming n umb e r ofcust ome rs h asa ne g a tive netw o rk  ext ernali ty o n
 the_sequential voting_game, voters learn from_the previous_votes_to update_their_believes on the_candidates and the_probability that the candidates_win the election.

In_the_investment game, there are multiple projects and investors, where each project has different probability_of_success and_different_payoff._One investor may invest one_or several projects if his_budget allows._If the project succeeds, he receives a payoff_from_the project. When_more investors invest in the same project, the succeeding_probability of the project increases, which_benefits all investors_investing_this_project. Note that in_both voting and investment games, the_agent’s decision has a positive effect_on ones’ decisions. When one agent makes_a decision, the subsequent agents are_encouraged to make the same_decision in_two aspects: the probability that_this action has_the positive_outcome increases due_to this agent’s decision, and the_potential reward of_this action may be significantly large_according_to the belief_of_this_agent.

The combination_of negative network_externality_with social_learning,_on the other hand, is difficult_to_analyze. When the network externality is negative,_the game becomes an_anti-coordination_game, where one agent_seeks the strategy that differs_from others’ to maximize his own_reward. Nevertheless,_in such_a scenario, the agent’s decision also contains some information about his_belief on the uncertain system state,_which can be learned_by subsequent_agents_through social learning_algorithms._Thus, subsequent_agents may then realize that his choice_is better_than others, and make the same_decision with the agent._Since_the network externality is negative, the_information leaked by the agent’s decision_may impair the reward the_agent_can_obtain in the game. Therefore,_rational agents should take into account_the possible reactions_of subsequent players to maximize their own_rewards.

The_negative network externality plays an important_rule_in many applications in different research_fields,_such_as spectrum access in cognitive_radio, storage service selection in cloud_computing, and deal selection on Groupon in online social_networking. In spectrum_access problem, for instance, secondary_users_access_the same spectrum need to share with each others. The_more secondary_users access the_same channel, the less available access time for each of_them. In storage service selection problem, the_reliability and availability are affected by the number of subscribers. The_more subscribers using the same service, the lower_the service quality of the cloud storage_platform. For the deal_selection_on Groupon website, some businesses may receive_overwhelming_number_of_customers under the_discounted deal. The_overwhelming number of_customers has_a negative network_externality on