2$ and we call the corresponding vertex for this $G_2$, say $w$. Each vertex of $G_2$ is now adjacent to all of the adjacent vertices of $w$. So each color of $w$ for the TD-coloring, can use for each vertices of $G_2$, too. So this is a TD-coloring of $G_1\star G_2$ and we have $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\vert V(G_2)\vert.$$ [$\square$]{}

\[3\] For any two connected graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi_d^t(G_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the colors $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $G_1$ as we colored $G_1$ for a TD-coloring. So each vertex of $G_1$ uses the old color class. Now for every copy of $G_2$ we give the colors $b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_{\chi_d^t(G_2)}$ to its vertices as we color $G_2$ for a TD-coloring. Now by the same argument as the proof of the Theorem \[2\] we have the result. [$\square$]{}

The following theorem present an upper bound for $\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)$ based on total dominator chromatic number of $G_1$ and chromatic number of $G_2$.

\[4\] For any two connected graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)=\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi(G_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the colors $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $G_1$ as we colored $G_1$ for a TD-coloring. So each vertex of $G_1$
2 $ and we call the corresponding vertex for this $ G_2 $, say $ w$. Each vertex of $ G_2 $ is now adjacent to all of the adjacent vertex of $ w$. therefore each color of $ w$ for the TD - coloring, can use for each vertex of $ G_2 $, too. So this is a TD - color of $ G_1\star G_2 $ and we have $ $ \chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\vert V(G_2)\vert.$$ [ $ \square$ ] { } 

 \[3\ ] For any two connected graphs $ G_1 $ and $ G_2 $, $ $ \chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi_d^t(G_2).$$ 

 [ [ * * validation.   * * ] { } ] { } We contribute the colors $ a_1,a_2,\ldots, a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertex of $ G_1 $ as we colored $ G_1 $ for a TD - coloring. then each vertex of $ G_1 $ use the old semblance class. Now for every transcript of $ G_2 $ we give the colors $ b_1,b_2,\ldots, b_{\chi_d^t(G_2)}$ to its vertices as we discolor $ G_2 $ for a TD - coloring. Now by the like argument as the validation of the Theorem \[2\ ] we have the result. [ $ \square$ ] { } 

 The following theorem present an upper bound for $ \chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)$ based on entire dominator chromatic number of $ G_1 $ and chromatic number of $ G_2$. 

 \[4\ ] For any two connected graphs $ G_1 $ and $ G_2 $, $ $ \chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)=\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi(G_2).$$ 

 [ [ * * Proof.   * * ] { } ] { } We give the colors $ a_1,a_2,\ldots, a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $ G_1 $ as we colored $ G_1 $ for a TD - coloring. So each vertex of $ G_1 $
2$ anf we call the correspondlng vertex for tkus $G_2$, sey $w$. Eadh verteb of $G_2$ is now adjacent to alp if tht adjacent vertices of $w$. So vach coloe of $q$ for the VS-coloriky, can mse fmc each vertices of $G_2$, too. Vo this is a TG-cullring of $G_1\star G_2$ and we have $$\chi_d^t(G_1\ftar G_2)\lrq\fhi_d^t(G_1)+\vert V(G_2)\vgrt.$$ [$\satare$]{}

\[3\] For any two connected graphs $G_1$ ans $G_2$, $$\chi_v^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_c^t(G_1)+\chi_d^t(G_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the fologs $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ ho the vertuces if $G_1$ as we culored $G_1$ for a TD-colorjng. So each vertex of $G_1$ uses thd old color claws. Noa for every ropy os $G_2$ we give bne colmrs $b_1,b_2,\lcots,b_{\chi_d^t(G_2)}$ to itv vwrtices as we color $G_2$ for a TD-coloring. Gow by tha aame argument as rhw promf ox thd Thdortm \[2\] ws have thx result. [$\sqhare$]{}

The foloowing theorem prestnt qn upper bouns for $\shy_d^t(G_1\star G_2)$ based on total dominator chrmmafic number of $G_1$ and chrimatic number of $G_2$.

\[4\] Fot any two sonnected graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)=\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi(G_2).$$

[[**Prmof. **]{}]{}We eivt bme cuoogs $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $G_1$ as we sklprvd $G_1$ for a TD-coloving. So each vertec lf $D_1$
2$ and we call the corresponding vertex $G_2$, $w$. Each of $G_2$ is the vertices of $w$. each color of for the TD-coloring, can use for vertices of $G_2$, too. So this is a TD-coloring of $G_1\star G_2$ and have $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\vert V(G_2)\vert.$$ [$\square$]{} \[3\] For any two connected graphs $G_1$ and $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star [[**Proof. give colors $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $G_1$ as we colored $G_1$ for a TD-coloring. So each of $G_1$ uses the old color class. Now every copy of $G_2$ give the colors $b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_{\chi_d^t(G_2)}$ to vertices we color for TD-coloring. by the same as the proof of the Theorem \[2\] we have the result. [$\square$]{} The following theorem present an bound for based on dominator number $G_1$ and chromatic $G_2$. \[4\] For any two connected $G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)=\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi(G_2).$$ [[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the colors to the of $G_1$ as we colored $G_1$ a TD-coloring. So each vertex of $G_1$
2$ and we call the corresponding Vertex for tHis $G_2$, sAy $w$. eacH vErteX of $G_2$ Is now adjacent tO All oF the adjacent vertices of $W$. So eaCh COlor OF $w$ For thE TD-coloRInG, CAn uSe FoR eaCh VErTices Of $G_2$, Too. So thIs is a TD-colOriNg Of $G_1\star G_2$ and wE HaVe $$\chi_d^t(G_1\stAr G_2)\Leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\verT V(G_2)\Vert.$$ [$\sqUaRe$]{}

\[3\] FOR any tWo cOnnecTed graPHs $G_1$ and $g_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\stAr g_2)\Leq\chi_D^T(G_1)+\chi_d^t(g_2).$$

[[**pRoOf. **]{}]{}We Give the colors $a_1,a_2,\ldOTs,A_{\Chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the verTices oF $G_1$ AS wE COloRed $g_1$ for a TD-colOrIng. So EAch vertEX oF $g_1$ USes THe old color claSs. Now for eveRY coPy of $G_2$ wE gIve THe coloRs $b_1,b_2,\lDoTS,b_{\cHi_d^t(G_2)}$ to its vErtiCes as we coLor $G_2$ foR A TD-coloRIng. Now bY the saMe aRguMent AS tHe ProOf OF thE thEorEM \[2\] we Have the rEsUlT. [$\squaRe$]{}

ThE FOLLowiNg tHeorEm preSent an upper boUnd For $\cHI_d^t(g_1\star g_2)$ baseD on tOtAl domInator ChromAtIc number of $G_1$ and cHromAtic numbeR of $g_2$.

\[4\] FOr aNy Two coNNected GraPhs $g_1$ and $G_2$, $$\chI_d^t(G_1\staR g_2)=\chI_d^T(g_1)+\CHi(g_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the colOrS $A_1,A_2,\lDots,a_{\chi_D^t(G_1)}$ to tHE vErTIces of $G_1$ aS wE coLoreD $g_1$ For a Td-colORiNg. So each Vertex OF $G_1$
2$ and we call the corresp onding ver tex f orthi s$G_2 $, s ay $w$. Each v e rtex  of $G_2$ is now adjac ent t oa ll o f  t he ad jacentv er t i ces  o f$w$ .S oeachcol or of $ w$ for the  TD -c oloring, can us e for each  ve rtices of $G _2$ , too.  S o t h is is  aTD-co loring of $G_ 1\star G_ 2$ and we have $$ \ c hi _d^t (G_1\star G_2)\le q \c h i_d^t(G_1)+\ve rt V(G _2 ) \v e r t.$ $ [ $\square$] {} 

\[3 \ ] For a n yt w o  co n nected graphs  $G_1$ and$ G_2 $, $$\ ch i_d ^ t(G_1\ starG_ 2 )\l eq\chi_d^t( G_1) +\chi_d^t (G_2). $ $

[[** P roof. * *]{}]{ }We  gi ve t h eco lor s$ a_1 , a_ 2,\ l dot s,a_{\ch i_ d^ t(G_1 )}$t o t he v ert ices  of $ G_1$ as we co lor ed $ G _1$  fora TD- colo ri ng. S o each  vert ex  of $G_1$ usestheold color  cl as s.No w for everycop y o f $G_2$  we giv e  th ec o l or s $b_1,b_2,\ldots, b_ { \ ch i_d^t(G_ 2)}$ t o  i ts vertices  a s w e co l o r $G_ 2$ f o ra TD-col oring. No wby thesa me arg um ent  as  thep roof  of th e Theore m \[2 \ ] we have ther esult. [$\squ a re $ ] {} 
The  fo llowing the orem pres enta nupp e r bou nd fo r$ \c h i_d^t(G_1\star G_2) $basedon to tal dominator  chromatic n u mber of$G_1 $  a n d chromatic nu mberof $G_2$.\[4\] Fo r any  two con nected gr a p hs $G_1$  an d $ G_2 $,$ $ \c hi_d^t(G_1\st a r  G_2 )= \chi_d^ t(G _1)+\ch i(G _2) .$$ 

[ [* *Proof. * *]{}]{}W egi ve  t hecolor s  $a_1,a_ 2, \ld ot s,a _{\ch i _d^t(G _1)}$  toth ev ert ices of $G _ 1 $ as  w ecolo red  $ G_1$fora  TD -colori ng. So ea chv erte xof  $G_1$
2$ and_we call_the corresponding vertex for_this $G_2$,_say_$w$. Each_vertex_of $G_2$ is_now adjacent to_all of the adjacent_vertices of $w$._So_each color of $w$ for the TD-coloring, can use for each vertices of $G_2$,_too._So this_is_a_TD-coloring of $G_1\star G_2$ and_we have $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\vert V(G_2)\vert.$$_[$\square$]{}

\[3\] For_any two connected graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star_G_2)\leq\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi_d^t(G_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We_give the colors_$a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to the vertices of $G_1$ as we colored_$G_1$ for a TD-coloring. So each_vertex of $G_1$_uses_the_old color class. Now_for every copy of $G_2$ we_give the colors $b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_{\chi_d^t(G_2)}$ to its_vertices as we color $G_2$ for a_TD-coloring. Now by the same argument_as the proof of the_Theorem \[2\]_we have the result. [$\square$]{}

The_following theorem present_an upper_bound for $\chi_d^t(G_1\star_G_2)$ based on total dominator chromatic_number of $G_1$_and chromatic number of $G_2$.

\[4\] For_any_two connected graphs_$G_1$_and_$G_2$, $$\chi_d^t(G_1\star_G_2)=\chi_d^t(G_1)+\chi(G_2).$$

[[**Proof. **]{}]{}We give the_colors_$a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\chi_d^t(G_1)}$ to_the_vertices of $G_1$ as we colored_$G_1$_for a TD-coloring. So each vertex of_$G_1$