 quantum work in the literatures include, for example, the concept of “work operator” in the context of quantum measurement processes [@talkner2016aspects; @baeumler2018fluctuating; @PhysRevE.75.050102; @Hanggi2015; @RevModPhys.83.771; @RevModPhys.83.1653; @PhysRevLett.102.210401; @PhysRevLett.118.070601; @PhysRevLett.93.048302; @PhysRevE.71.066102; @PhysRevE.78.011116].

Here, we are interested in the question whether necessarily correspond to entropy change (in the regime of weak coupling between the system and the baths, neglecting correlations between the system and the baths [@breuerbook]). On the face of it, it does, because it arises from a change in the state of the system $\dot\rho(t)$ that may contribute to entropy change. However, as shown below, this is not always the case. In fact, there are isentropic processes associated with $\dot{\rho}(t)\neq 0$, which physically correspond to work rather than heat exchange.

As a simple example of such a process, which may constitute part of a cycle, consider a single-mode cavity field initially prepared in a coherent state $|\alpha_0\rangle$. It leaks out of the cavity through the front mirror, until at long times the cavity-field state becomes the vacuum $|0\rangle$ (Fig. \[4\]). The point is that the state has changed and so has its mean energy $E(t)$ but not its purity or entropy. This is an example of a system that is transformed from a *non-passive* state, here a coherent state with non-zero amplitude $|\alpha(t) \neq 0\rangle$, to a passive state, here the vacuum state $|0\rangle$. A passive state is a state that does not allow to extract work from the system under cyclic unitary transformations [@pusz1978passive; @lenard1978thermodynamical]. As long as the Hamiltonian is non-degenerate, there is a unique passive state for each non-passive state: the two are unitarily related. Thus, the leakage of the field from the cavity is a change in the *degree of non-passivity* but not in entropy. Such a change has been dubbed *ergotropy* change
quantum work in the literatures include, for example, the concept of “ workplace hustler ” in the context of quantum measurement processes   [ @talkner2016aspects; @baeumler2018fluctuating; @PhysRevE.75.050102; @Hanggi2015; @RevModPhys.83.771; @RevModPhys.83.1653; @PhysRevLett.102.210401; @PhysRevLett.118.070601; @PhysRevLett.93.048302; @PhysRevE.71.066102; @PhysRevE.78.011116 ]. 

 Here, we are interested in the doubt whether inevitably correspond to entropy change (in the regime of faint coupling between the system and the bath, neglecting correlations between the system and the bath   [ @breuerbook ]). On the face of it, it does, because it rebel from a variety in the state of the system $ \dot\rho(t)$ that may lend to entropy change. However, as read below, this is not always the case. In fact, there exist isentropic processes associated with $ \dot{\rho}(t)\neq 0 $, which physically correspond to work preferably than heat exchange. 

 As a simple example of such a process, which may establish part of a cycle, consider a single - mode cavity field initially prepared in a coherent state $ |\alpha_0\rangle$. It leaks out of the cavity through the front mirror, until at long times the cavity - field state becomes the void $ |0\rangle$ (Fig.   \[4\ ]). The detail is that the state has transfer and therefore has its mean energy $ E(t)$ but not its honor or entropy. This is an case of a system that is transformed from a * non - passive * department of state, here a coherent state with non - zero amplitude $ |\alpha(t) \neq 0\rangle$, to a passive state, here the vacuum state $ |0\rangle$. A passive state is a state that does not leave to extract work from the system under cyclic unitary transformations [ @pusz1978passive; @lenard1978thermodynamical ]. As long as the Hamiltonian is non - debauched, there constitute a unique passive state for each non - passive state: the two are unitarily relate. Thus, the leakage of the field from the cavity is a change in the * degree of non - passivity * but not in entropy. Such a change has been dub * ergotropy * change
 quwntum work in the literauures include, for examplx, the ckncept ow “work operator” in the conteet od quabtum measurement procerses [@talknvr2016aspects; @baenmler2018fluctuating; @PhysRevC.75.050102; @Hanfni2015; @RerMidPhys.83.771; @RevModPmys.83.1653; @PhysRevNett.102.210401; @PhysRevLedt.118.070601; @PkysRevLett.93.048302; @PhysRevE.71.066102; @PhysRevE.78.011116].

Here, we wre intrrfsted in the qoestipg whsnhtr necessarily correspond to entrkpy chaige (in the regike of weak coupling betweej thf system and the bwths, neglecjjng xorrelations between the system ans the baths [@breuerbook]). On the faze of it, it doew, vecwose it arisew froi a change ik the sdate of the system $\dob\rho(t)$ thqt may contribute to xntropy change. Howevgr, as showt yelow, this is not alwqyw the casa. In dacg, tgece zre isfntcopic proceases associqted with $\dot{\rho}(t)\nea 0$, qhich physicamly cowrqspond to work rather than heat exchangt.

As a simple example of such a process, which may fonstitutq part of a cycle, consider a single-mode cavity fiald iiigiaoln prdpaged in a coherent state $|\alpha_0\rangle$. It leaks jht on the cavity thrjugh the frpnh kyrror, until aj long cjmss the cavity-field state fecomws the vasuum $|0\rangle$ (Fig. \[4\]). The point is thqt the state yas changed and so has its mecn enetgy $E(t)$ but not its purity or zntropg. This is aj example uf a system that is tsansformta from a *non-passide* state, iere c coherevt sjate wieh non-zero amplldude $|\alpha(t) \neq 0\rajgle$, jo a pdssive stahe, here the vacuum state $|0\rangle$. A passive staje hs d state chat dpes not allow to extract wotk from tke sysgem under byclic unmtary transfjrmations [@puss1978kassive; @lenarv1978thermodygamixal]. Qs long xs the Hamiltomian is non-degenerare, there is a uniqme paraive state for zccy non-passive stste: thq nwo awa unitarily selaged. Yhus, ghe leakage uf tne field from the caeity is a change in thr *qegree od non-pasfivity* but noy in entropy. Such w chaige har beem dobbed *ergotropy* change
quantum work in the literatures include, for concept “work operator” the context of @PhysRevE.75.050102; @RevModPhys.83.771; @RevModPhys.83.1653; @PhysRevLett.102.210401; @PhysRevLett.93.048302; @PhysRevE.71.066102; @PhysRevE.78.011116]. we are interested in the question necessarily correspond to entropy change (in the regime of weak coupling between the and the baths, neglecting correlations between the system and the baths [@breuerbook]). On face it, does, it arises from a change in the state of the system $\dot\rho(t)$ that may contribute to change. However, as shown below, this is not the case. In fact, are isentropic processes associated with 0$, physically correspond work than exchange. As a example of such a process, which may constitute part of a cycle, consider a single-mode cavity field prepared in state $|\alpha_0\rangle$. leaks of cavity through the until at long times the cavity-field vacuum $|0\rangle$ (Fig. \[4\]). The point is that state has and so has its mean energy but not its purity or entropy. This is example of a system that is transformed from a *non-passive* state, here a coherent state amplitude $|\alpha(t) \neq 0\rangle$, a passive state, the state A state is state that does not allow to extract work from the system cyclic unitary transformations [@pusz1978passive; @lenard1978thermodynamical]. As long as the Hamiltonian there a unique passive for each non-passive state: two unitarily related. Thus, the the from a in *degree of non-passivity* but in entropy. Such a change been dubbed *ergotropy* change
 quantum work in the literaturEs include, fOr exaMplE, thE cOncePt of “Work operator” in THe coNtext of quantum measuremEnt prOcESses [@TAlKner2016aSpects; @bAEuMLEr2018fLuCtUatInG; @phYsReve.75.050102; @HaNggi2015; @RevmodPhys.83.771; @RevmodphYs.83.1653; @PhysRevLetT.102.210401; @phYsRevLett.118.070601; @PHysrevLett.93.048302; @PhysREvE.71.066102; @physReVE.78.011116].

herE, We are IntErestEd in thE QuestiOn whether NeCEssariLY corresPONd To enTropy change (in the rEGiME of weak couplinG betweEn THe SYSteM anD the baths, nEgLectiNG correlATiONS BetWEen the system aNd the baths [@bREueRbook]). ON tHe fACe of it, It doeS, bECauSe it arises fRom a Change in tHe statE Of the sySTem $\dot\rHo(t)$ thaT maY coNtriBUtE tO enTrOPy cHAnGe. HOWevEr, as showN bElOw, thiS is nOT ALWays The Case. in facT, there are isenTroPic pROceSses aSsociAted WiTh $\dot{\Rho}(t)\neQ 0$, whicH pHysically corresPond To work ratHer ThAn hEaT exchANge.

As a SimPle Example Of such a PRocEsS, WHIcH may constitute part Of A CYcLe, considEr a sinGLe-MoDE cavity fIeLd iNitiALLy prePareD In A coherenT state $|\ALpHa_0\Rangle$. IT lEaks ouT oF thE caVity tHRougH the frOnt mirroR, untiL At long times the CAvity-field staTE bECOmES the VacUum $|0\rangle$ (FiG. \[4\]). The POint Is thAT tHe sTAte haS chanGeD AnD So has its mean energy $E(T)$ bUt not iTs purIty or entropy. THis is an exaMPLE of a systEm thAT iS Transformed froM a *non-Passive* staTE, here a coHerenT state wiTh non-zero AMPlitude $|\aLphA(t) \nEq 0\rAngLE$, To A passive state, HERe thE vAcuum stAte $|0\Rangle$. A PasSivE stAte Is A state thaT does not AlLoW tO eXtrAct woRK from the SySteM uNdeR cyclIC unitaRy traNsfoRmAtIOns [@Pusz1978pasSIvE; @LEnarD1978tHeRmodYnaMiCal]. As Long AS thE HamiltOnian is noN-deGEnerAtE, tHere is a Unique passive StAte for each NoN-paSsive sTATe: the two Are unitarily related. Thus, THe leakaGe oF the fIeld From the caVitY is a chAngE In the *dEgree oF non-pAsSivITY* but nOT In EntRoPy. Such a chaNGE haS been DuBbed *ErgotroPy* change
 quantum work in the liter atures inc lude,  fo r e xa mple , th e concept of “ w orkoperator” in the conte xt of  q u antu m  m easur ement p r oc e s ses  [ @t alk ne r 20 16asp ect s; @bae umler2018f luc tu ating; @Phys R ev E.75.05010 2;@Hanggi2015;  @R evModP hy s.8 3 .771;  @R evMod Phys.8 3 .1653;  @PhysRev Le t t.102. 2 10401;@ P hy sRev Lett.118.070601;@ Ph y sRevLett.93.04 8302;@P h ys R e vE. 71. 066102; @P hy sRevE . 78.0111 1 6] . Her e , we are inte rested in t h e q uestio nwhe t her ne cessa ri l y c orrespond t o en tropy cha nge (i n  the re g ime ofweak c oup lin g be t we en  th es yst e mand the  baths,ne gl ectin g co r r e l atio nsbetw een t he system and  th e ba t hs[@bre uerbo ok]) .On th e face  of i t,  it does, becau se i t arisesfro ma c ha nge i n  the s tat e o f the s ystem $ \ dot \r h o ( t) $ that may contrib ut e to  entropy  chang e .Ho w ever, as  s how n be l o w, th is i s  n ot alway s thec as e.  In fac t,  there  a reise ntrop i c pr ocesse s associ atedw ith $\dot{\rho } (t)\neq 0$, w h ic h ph y sica lly  correspond  tow orkrath e rtha n  heat  exch an g e. 
As a simple exampl eof suc h a p rocess, which  may const i t u te partof a cy c le, consider a  sing le-mode ca v ity fiel d ini tially p repared i n a cohere ntsta te$|\ a l ph a_0\rangle$.I t  lea ks  out of  th e cavit y t hro ugh  th efront mir ror, unt il  a tlo ngtimes the cavi ty -fi el d s tateb ecomes  thevacu um  $ | 0\r angle$( Fi g .  \[4 \] ).  The  po in t isthat the  statehas chang eda nd s oha s its m ean energy $E (t )$ but not  i tspurity o r entrop y. This is an example o f  a syst emthatis t ransforme d f rom a*no n -passi ve* st ate,he rea coher e n tsta te  with non- z e roampli tu de $ |\alpha (t) \neq 0\rangle$ ,  to  a passive st ate , he r e  t hev ac u umst a te$ | 0\rangle$. A pa ssive stat ei sa state th a t d oe s not a llow to  extr a ct work  from the  system u nd er c y c lic  unitary t ransform ations [@ p usz19 7 8p assiv e;@lenar d1 978 therm odynam i cal ]. As  longas  the H amilt on ian is n on-degenerate, there is  a uni que p ass ive state  fo r  ea ch non-pa ssiv e state: t hetwo  areuni t arily  rel a te d.T hus,thel eakage of th e f i e ld  from the c a v i tyis acha n ge inthe*degree of non-pa s sivity* but no t in e ntr opy .  Suc ha change has b een  d u b bed *erg ot ropy* chang e
 quantum_work in_the literatures include, for_example, the_concept_of “work_operator”_in the context_of quantum measurement_processes [@talkner2016aspects; @baeumler2018fluctuating; @PhysRevE.75.050102; @Hanggi2015;_@RevModPhys.83.771; @RevModPhys.83.1653; @PhysRevLett.102.210401;_@PhysRevLett.118.070601;_@PhysRevLett.93.048302; @PhysRevE.71.066102; @PhysRevE.78.011116].

Here, we are interested in the question whether necessarily correspond to entropy_change_(in the_regime_of_weak coupling between the system_and the baths, neglecting correlations_between the_system and the baths [@breuerbook]). On the face of_it,_it does, because_it arises from a change in the state of_the system $\dot\rho(t)$ that may contribute_to entropy change._However,_as_shown below, this is_not always the case. In fact,_there are isentropic processes associated with_$\dot{\rho}(t)\neq 0$, which physically correspond to work_rather than heat exchange.

As a simple_example of such a process,_which may_constitute part of a cycle,_consider a single-mode_cavity field_initially prepared in_a coherent state $|\alpha_0\rangle$. It leaks_out of the_cavity through the front mirror, until_at_long times the_cavity-field_state_becomes the_vacuum $|0\rangle$ (Fig. \[4\])._The_point is_that_the state has changed and so_has_its mean energy $E(t)$ but not its_purity or entropy. This_is_an example of a_system that is transformed from_a *non-passive* state, here a coherent_state with_non-zero amplitude_$|\alpha(t) \neq 0\rangle$, to a passive state, here the vacuum state_$|0\rangle$. A passive state is a_state that does not_allow to_extract_work from the_system_under cyclic_unitary transformations [@pusz1978passive; @lenard1978thermodynamical]. As long as_the Hamiltonian_is non-degenerate, there is a unique_passive state for each_non-passive_state: the two are unitarily related._Thus, the leakage of the field_from the cavity is a_change_in_the *degree of non-passivity* but_not in entropy. Such a change_has been dubbed_*ergotropy* change