}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ near $W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ are mapped into ${{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ in a flow-box along the each one of the connections $[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$. Without loss of generality, we will assume that the transition $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}: {{\text{Out}}}({{\rm\bf v}}) \rightarrow {{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ does not depend on $\lambda$ and is modelled by the identity, which is compatible with hypothesis (P\[P6\]). Using a more general form for $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$ would complicate the calculations without any change in the final results. The coordinates on $V$ and $W$ are chosen to have $[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$ connecting points with $z>0$ in $V$ to points with $z>0$ in $W$. We will denote by $\eta$ the map $\eta=\Phi_{{{\rm\bf w}}} \circ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}} \circ \Phi_{{{\rm\bf v}}}$. Up to higher order terms, from and, its expression in local coordinates, for $y>0$, is $$\label{eqeta}
\eta(x,y)=\left(x-K \ln y, y^{\delta} \right)
\qquad\mbox{with}\qquad
\delta=\delta_{{\rm\bf v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 
\qquad\mbox{and}
\qquad K= \frac{C_{{\rm\bf v}}+E_{{\rm\bf w}}}{E_{{\rm\bf v}}E_{{\rm\bf w}}} > 0.$$

The choice of $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$ as the identity reflects the fact that the node have the same chirality. In the case where the nodes have different chirality, them map $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$ reverses orientation. This affects the form of the map $\eta$ and any subsequent results that use it.

Geometry of the transition map
------------------------------

Consider a cylinder $C$ parametrised by a covering $(\theta
} } } ({ { \rm\bf v}})$ near $ W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ are mapped into $ { { \text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ in a flow - box along the each one of the connections $ [ { { \rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$. Without personnel casualty of generalization, we will assume that the transition $ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow { { \rm\bf watt } } }: { { \text{Out}}}({{\rm\bf v } }) \rightarrow { { \text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ does not count on $ \lambda$ and is modelled by the identity, which is compatible with hypothesis (P\[P6\ ]). Using a more cosmopolitan shape for $ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow { { \rm\bf w}}}$ would complicate the calculations without any variety in the concluding results. The coordinates on $ V$ and $ W$ are choose to have $ [ { { \rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$ connecting point with $ z>0 $ in $ V$ to points with $ z>0 $ in $ W$. We will denote by $ \eta$ the map $ \eta=\Phi_{{{\rm\bf w } } } \circ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow { { \rm\bf w } } } \circ \Phi_{{{\rm\bf v}}}$. Up to high order terms, from and, its expression in local coordinate, for $ y>0 $, is $ $ \label{eqeta } 
 \eta(x, y)=\left(x - K \ln y, y^{\delta } \right) 
 \qquad\mbox{with}\qquad 
 \delta=\delta_{{\rm\bf v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 
 \qquad\mbox{and } 
 \qquad K= \frac{C_{{\rm\bf v}}+E_{{\rm\bf w}}}{E_{{\rm\bf v}}E_{{\rm\bf w } } } > 0.$$ 

 The choice of $ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow { { \rm\bf w}}}$ as the identity reflects the fact that the lymph node have the same chirality. In the sheath where the nodes consume different chirality, them map $ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow { { \rm\bf w}}}$ reverses orientation. This affect the form of the map $ \eta$ and any subsequent results that use it. 

 Geometry of the transition function 
 ------------------------------ 

 see a cylinder $ C$ parametrised by a covering $ (\theta
}}}({{\rm\bv v}})$ near $W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ are mapped into ${{\text{Ii}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ in a fluw-box along the each one of vhe xonnextions $[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrod{{\rm\bf w}}]$. Wpthout lows oh generality, we xjll assmie tgwt tke transition $\Psl_{{{\rm\bf v}}\righdarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}: {{\debt{Lut}}}({{\rm\bf v}}) \rightarrow {{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ djes not dfpend on $\lambdw$ anc is jodelled by the identity, which is dompatiule with hypothrsis (P\[P6\]). Using a more generwl flrm for $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rlghtarrow {{\rn\bf r}}}$ would complkcate the bclculations without any change in the finau resblts. The coireinwjes on $V$ and $W$ arv chosen to have $[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightsrrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$ coknectmng points with $z>0$ in $V$ to points with $z>0$ in $R$. We will dznote by $\eta$ the map $\wtq=\Phi_{{{\rk\bf f}}} \cifx \Pri_{{{\rj\bh v}}\dightagrox {{\rm\bf w}}} \cidc \Phi_{{{\rm\bf c}}}$. Up to higher ordet evtms, from and, its evpwession in local coordinates, for $y>0$, is $$\ldbem{eqeta}
\eta(x,y)=\left(x-K \ln y, t^{\delta} \right)
\qquad\mbox{aith}\qquad
\qelta=\delta_{{\rm\bf v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 
\qquad\mbox{and}
\qquad K= \fsac{C_{{\rj\cf r}}+C_{{\vm\bf q}}}{E_{{\gm\bf v}}E_{{\rm\bf w}}} > 0.$$

The choice of $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarwkw {{\rk\bf w}}}$ as the ibentity reflects tje sact that the node kzvs the same chiralihy. In tre cawe where uhe npdes have different chiraliry, them map $\Isi_{{{\rn\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\yf w}}}$ reverser oroentayion. This affects the furm kf the map $\fta$ and ahh subsequent resjltx dhat use it.

Geometry of the transitiin mcp
------------------------------

Considdr a cylinqer $C$ paraletrised by a covering $(\tjeta
}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ near $W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ are mapped w}})$ a flow-box the each one w}}]$. loss of generality, will assume that transition $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}: {{\text{Out}}}({{\rm\bf \rightarrow {{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$ does not depend on $\lambda$ and is modelled by the which is compatible with hypothesis (P\[P6\]). Using a more general form for $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf {{\rm\bf would the without any change in the final results. The coordinates on $V$ and $W$ are chosen to $[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$ connecting points with $z>0$ in to points with $z>0$ $W$. We will denote by the $\eta=\Phi_{{{\rm\bf w}}} \Psi_{{{\rm\bf {{\rm\bf \circ \Phi_{{{\rm\bf v}}}$. to higher order terms, from and, its expression in local coordinates, for $y>0$, is $$\label{eqeta} \eta(x,y)=\left(x-K \ln y^{\delta} \right) v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 \qquad \frac{C_{{\rm\bf w}}}{E_{{\rm\bf v}}E_{{\rm\bf w}}} The choice of $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf identity reflects the fact that the node have same chirality. the case where the nodes have chirality, them map $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$ reverses This affects the form of the map $\eta$ and any subsequent results that use it. the transition map ------------------------------ a cylinder $C$ by covering
}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ near $W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ arE mapped intO ${{\text{in}}}({{\rM\bf W}})$ iN a flOw-boX along the each oNE of tHe connections $[{{\rm\bf v}}\righTarroW{{\rM\Bf w}}]$. WIThOut loSs of genERaLITy, wE wIlL asSuME tHat thE trAnsitioN $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rIghTaRrow {{\rm\bf w}}}: {{\texT{ouT}}}({{\rm\bf v}}) \righTarRow {{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bF w}})$ dOes not DePenD On $\lamBda$ And is ModellED by the Identity, wHiCH is comPAtible wITH hYpotHesis (P\[P6\]). Using a more GEnERal form for $\Psi_{{{\rM\bf v}}\riGhTArROW {{\rm\Bf w}}}$ Would complIcAte thE CalculaTIoNS WIthOUt any change in The final resULts. the cooRdInaTEs on $V$ aNd $W$ arE cHOseN to have $[{{\rm\bf V}}\rigHtarrow{{\rm\Bf w}}]$ conNEcting pOInts witH $z>0$ in $V$ tO poIntS witH $Z>0$ iN $W$. we wIlL DenOTe By $\eTA$ thE map $\eta=\PHi_{{{\Rm\Bf w}}} \ciRc \PsI_{{{\RM\BF v}}\riGhtArroW {{\rm\bf W}}} \circ \Phi_{{{\rm\bf v}}}$. up tO higHEr oRder tErms, fRom aNd, Its exPressiOn in lOcAl coordinates, foR $y>0$, is $$\Label{eqetA}
\etA(x,Y)=\leFt(X-K \ln y, Y^{\Delta} \rIghT)
\qqUad\mbox{With}\qquAD
\deLtA=\DELtA_{{\rm\bf v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 
\qqUaD\MBoX{and}
\qquaD K= \frac{c_{{\Rm\Bf V}}+e_{{\rm\bf w}}}{E_{{\rM\bF v}}E_{{\Rm\bf W}}} > 0.$$

tHe choIce oF $\psI_{{{\rm\bf v}}\riGhtarrOW {{\rM\bF w}}}$ as the IdEntity ReFleCts The faCT thaT the noDe have thE same CHirality. In the cASe where the nodES hAVE dIFferEnt Chirality, thEm maP $\psi_{{{\rM\bf v}}\RIgHtaRRow {{\rm\Bf w}}}$ reVeRSeS Orientation. This affeCtS the foRm of tHe map $\eta$ and anY subsequenT RESults thaT use IT.

GEOmetry of the traNsitiOn map
------------------------------

ConsiDEr a cylinDer $C$ pArametriSed by a covERIng $(\theta
}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$ near $W ^u_{{{\tex t{loc }}} }({ {\ rm\b f v} })$ are mapped into  ${{\text{In}}}({{\rm\ bf w} }) $  ina  f low-b ox alon g  t h e  ea ch  o neof th e con nec tions $ [{{\rm\bfv}} \r ightarrow{{\ r m\ bf w}}]$.Wit hout loss of  ge nerali ty , w e  will  as sumethat t h e tran sition $\ Ps i _{{{\r m \bf v}} \ r ig htar row {{\rm\bf w}}} :  { { \text{Out}}}({ {\rm\b fv }} ) \ri ght arrow {{\t ex t{In} } }({{\rm \ bf w } })$ does not depe nd on $\lam b da$  and i smod e lled b y the  i d ent ity, whichis c ompatible  withh ypothes i s (P\[P 6\]).Usi nga mo r ege ner al for m  f or$ \Ps i_{{{\rm \b fv}}\r ight a r r o w {{ \rm \bfw}}}$  would compli cat e th e  ca lcula tions  wit ho ut an y chan ge in  t he final result s. T he coordi nat es  on  $ V$ an d  $W$ a recho sen tohave $[ { {\r m\ b f v} }\rightarrow{{\rm\ bf w }} ]$ conne ctingp oi nt s  with $z >0 $ i n $V $ to po ints wi th $z>0$  in $W $ .We  will d en ote by  $ \et a$the m a p $\ eta=\P hi_{{{\r m\bfw }}} \circ \Psi _ {{{\rm\bf v}} \ ri g h ta r row{{\ rm\bf w}}}\cir c  \Ph i_{{ { \r m\b f  v}}} $. Up  t o  h i gher order terms, f ro m and,  itsexpression in  local coo r d i nates, f or $ y >0 $ , is $$\label{ eqeta }
\eta(x,y ) =\left(x -K \l n y, y^{ \delta} \ r i ght)
\qq uad \mb ox{ wit h } \q quad
\delta=\ d e lta_ {{ \rm\bfv}} \delta_ {{\ rm\ bfw}} >1  
\qquad\ mbox{and }\q qu ad  K=  \fra c {C_{{\rm \b f v }} +E_ {{\rm \ bf w}} }{E_{ {\rm \b fv }}E _{{\rm\ b fw } }} >  0 .$ $

T hech oiceof $ \ Psi _{{{\rm \bf v}}\r igh t arro w{{ \rm\bfw}}}$ as theid entity ref le cts  the f a c t that t he node have the same c h irality . I n the  cas e where t henodeshav e  diffe rent c hiral it y,t h em ma p $\ Psi _{ {{\rm\bf v } } \ri ghtar ro w {{ \rm\bfw}}}$ reverses ori e nta tion. This af fec ts t h e  f orm of the  m a p $ \ e ta$ and any sub sequent re su l ts  that usei t.
G eometry  of the  tran s ition m ap
------ --------- -- ---- - - --- ----

Cons ider a c ylinder $ C $ par a me trise d b y a co ve rin g $(\ theta
}}}({{\rm\bf v}})$_near $W^u_{{{\text{loc}}}}({{\rm\bf_v}})$ are mapped into_${{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$_in_a flow-box_along_the each one_of the connections_$[{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$. Without_loss of generality,_we_will assume that the transition $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}: {{\text{Out}}}({{\rm\bf v}}) \rightarrow {{\text{In}}}({{\rm\bf w}})$_does_not depend_on_$\lambda$_and is modelled by the_identity, which is compatible with_hypothesis (P\[P6\])._Using a more general form for $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow_{{\rm\bf_w}}}$ would complicate_the calculations without any change in the final results._The coordinates on $V$ and $W$_are chosen to_have_$[{{\rm\bf_v}}\rightarrow{{\rm\bf w}}]$ connecting points_with $z>0$ in $V$ to points_with $z>0$ in $W$. We will_denote by $\eta$ the map $\eta=\Phi_{{{\rm\bf w}}}_\circ \Psi_{{{\rm\bf v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}} \circ_\Phi_{{{\rm\bf v}}}$. Up to higher_order terms,_from and, its expression in_local coordinates, for_$y>0$, is_$$\label{eqeta}
\eta(x,y)=\left(x-K \ln y,_y^{\delta} \right)
\qquad\mbox{with}\qquad
\delta=\delta_{{\rm\bf v}}\delta_{{\rm\bf w}}>1 
\qquad\mbox{and}
\qquad K=_\frac{C_{{\rm\bf v}}+E_{{\rm\bf w}}}{E_{{\rm\bf_v}}E_{{\rm\bf w}}} > 0.$$

The choice of_$\Psi_{{{\rm\bf_v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$_as_the_identity reflects_the fact that_the_node have_the_same chirality. In the case where_the_nodes have different chirality, them map $\Psi_{{{\rm\bf_v}}\rightarrow {{\rm\bf w}}}$ reverses_orientation._This affects the form_of the map $\eta$ and_any subsequent results that use it.

Geometry_of the_transition map
------------------------------

Consider_a cylinder $C$ parametrised by a covering $(\theta