 the conjecture the use of homology may be insufficient. Probably we have to consider directly conditions about the fixed point sets of the diffeomorphisms, for example the existence of involutions with connected nonempty fixed point set (the hypothesis considered in this paper).

Preliminary results {#Section 2}
===================

In this section we present some preliminary results about finite groups acting on $3$–manifolds.

\[prop1\] Let $G$ be a finite group of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms of a closed orientable $3$–manifold and $f$ an element in $G$ with nonempty connected fixed point set $K$. Then the normalizer $N_G (f)$ of the subgroup generated by $f$ in $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of a semidirect product $${\Bbb Z}_2 \ltimes ({\Bbb Z}_a\times {\Bbb Z}_b),$$ for some nonnegative integers $a$ and $b$, where a generator of ${\Bbb Z}_2$ (an $f$–reflection, ie acting as a reflection on $K$ ) acts on the normal subgroup ${\Bbb Z}_a \times {\Bbb Z}_b$ of $f$–rotations (ie the elements acting as rotations on $K$) by sending each element to its inverse. In particular, $N_G(f)$ is solvable.

See Mecchia and Zimmermann [@MZ2 Lemma 1].

\[prop2\] Let $G$ be a finite group of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms of a closed orientable $3$–manifold. If $G$ is isomorphic to ${\Bbb Z}_2 \times {\Bbb Z}_2 \times {\Bbb Z}_2$, there exists in $G$ an involution that either acts freely or has nonconnected fixed point set.

By contradiction we suppose that the seven involutions in $G$ have connected and nonempty fixed point set. Let $f$ be one of the involutions, by the group $G$ contains four $f$–rotations and four $f$–reflections. We denote by $r$ one $f$–rotation of order two different from $f$ and we denote by $t$ one $f$–reflection, so the four $f$ rotations are Id, $f,\,r$ and $rf$ and the four $f$ reflections are $t,\,tf,\,tr$ and $tfr$. Since the fixed point sets of
the conjecture the use of homology may be insufficient. Probably we have to think immediately conditions about the fixed item set of the diffeomorphisms, for example the existence of engagement with plug in nonempty fixed point set (the hypothesis consider in this paper). 

 Preliminary results { # Section 2 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this section we present some preliminary results about finite group acting on $ 3$–manifolds. 

 \[prop1\ ] Let $ G$ be a finite group of orientation - preserve diffeomorphisms of a closed orientable $ 3$–manifold and $ f$ an element in $ G$ with nonempty connected fixed detail set $ K$. Then the normalizer $ N_G (f)$ of the subgroup generated by $ f$ in $ G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of a semidirect product $ $ { \Bbb Z}_2 \ltimes ({ \Bbb Z}_a\times { \Bbb Z}_b),$$ for some nonnegative integers $ a$ and $ b$, where a generator of $ { \Bbb Z}_2 $ (an $ f$–reflection, i acting as a reflection on $ K$) acts on the normal subgroup $ { \Bbb Z}_a \times { \Bbb Z}_b$ of $ f$–rotations (ie the elements acting as rotations on $ K$) by commit each element to its inverse. In particular, $ N_G(f)$ is solvable. 

 See Mecchia and Zimmermann [ @MZ2 Lemma 1 ]. 

 \[prop2\ ] Let $ G$ be a finite group of orientation - preserving diffeomorphisms of a closed orientable $ 3$–manifold. If $ G$ is isomorphic to $ { \Bbb Z}_2 \times { \Bbb Z}_2 \times { \Bbb Z}_2 $, there exists in $ G$ an involution that either dissemble freely or has nonconnected fixed point hardening. 

 By contradiction we suppose that the seven involutions in $ G$ have connected and nonempty fixed distributor point set. Let $ f$ be one of the involutions, by the group $ G$ contains four $ f$–rotations and four $ f$–reflections. We announce by $ r$ one $ f$–rotation of order two different from $ f$ and we denote by $ t$ one $ f$–reflection, so the four $ f$ rotations are I d, $ f,\,r$ and $ rf$ and the four $ f$ reflections are $ t,\,tf,\,tr$ and $ tfr$. Since the fixed point sets of
 thf conjecture the use of momology may be nbsuffirient. Pdobably de have to consider directly cindituons about the fixed puint sets of the eifftomorphisms, for eezmple tmz exiabence if involutions with connacted nonempty fkxzd point set (the hypothesis considerqd in tnid paper).

Prelimigary wesumns {#Section 2}
===================

In this section we pdesent vome preliminsry results about finite ggoupd acting on $3$–manifopds.

\[prop1\] Let $G$ bq a finite gruup of oritncation-presetving diffeomorphisms of a closea orizntable $3$–manufild dnd $f$ an elxment pn $G$ with nonckpty cmnnectec fixed point xet $K$. Rhen the normalizer $N_J (f)$ of the subgroup denerated bv $f$ in $G$ is isomorphix ro a vubgsoup if x stmivirsct prldurt $${\Bbb Z}_2 \ltjmes ({\Bbb Z}_a\rimes {\Bbb Z}_b),$$ for soke bonnegative ihtegerf $w$ and $b$, where a generator of ${\Bbb Z}_2$ (an $f$–geflsction, ie acting as a rwflection on $K$ ) acts ln the nowmal subgroup ${\Bbb Z}_a \times {\Bbb Z}_b$ of $f$–rotations (ia the dlenekts xxtlng as rotations on $K$) by sending each element fo ins inverse. In parbicular, $N_G(f)$ is solfahlr.

Fee Mecchia avd Zimmerjann [@MZ2 Lemma 1].

\[prop2\] Let $G$ fe a dinite grjup pf orientation-preserving didfeomorphismf of a closed oriencable $3$–manifoud. Ig $G$ ix isomorphic to ${\Bbb Z}_2 \tnmes {\Bgb Z}_2 \times {\Hbb Z}_2$, thedd exists in $G$ an innoludion thau either acts freejy or has noneonnectea ficed poynt set.

By fontradiction we suppose that tve seven ijvolutions in $G$ have connected eid nonempty foxad ioint set. Let $n$ be one of the involutions, bi the grobp $G$ cuntains folr $f$–rotatmons and fouw $f$–reflectionv. We denote bb $r$ one $f$–wotarion of orddf two differeny from $f$ cud we denite by $t$ one $f$–reflcctiov, so the four $f$ xuuarions are Id, $f,\,t$ avd $wf$ aid thq four $f$ reflactiuns sre $t,\,gf,\,tr$ and $tfv$. Sknce the fixed point setv of
the conjecture the use of homology may Probably have to directly conditions about the for example the of involutions with nonempty fixed point set (the hypothesis in this paper). Preliminary results {#Section 2} =================== In this section we present preliminary results about finite groups acting on $3$–manifolds. \[prop1\] Let $G$ be a group orientation-preserving of closed orientable $3$–manifold and $f$ an element in $G$ with nonempty connected fixed point set $K$. the normalizer $N_G (f)$ of the subgroup generated $f$ in $G$ is to a subgroup of a product Z}_2 \ltimes Z}_a\times Z}_b),$$ some nonnegative integers and $b$, where a generator of ${\Bbb Z}_2$ (an $f$–reflection, ie acting as a reflection on $K$ acts on subgroup ${\Bbb \times Z}_b$ $f$–rotations (ie the as rotations on $K$) by sending its inverse. In particular, $N_G(f)$ is solvable. See and Zimmermann Lemma 1]. \[prop2\] Let $G$ be finite group of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms of a closed $3$–manifold. If $G$ is isomorphic to ${\Bbb Z}_2 \times {\Bbb Z}_2 \times {\Bbb Z}_2$, there $G$ an involution that acts freely or nonconnected point By we suppose the seven involutions in $G$ have connected and nonempty fixed point Let $f$ be one of the involutions, by the group four and four $f$–reflections. denote by $r$ one of two different from $f$ denote $t$ the $f$ are Id, $f,\,r$ and and the four $f$ reflections $t,\,tf,\,tr$ and $tfr$. Since
 the conjecture the use of homoLogy may be iNsuffIciEnt. prObabLy we Have to consider DIrecTly conditions about the fIxed pOiNT setS Of The diFfeomorPHiSMS, foR eXaMplE tHE eXisteNce Of involUtions with ConNeCted nonempty FIxEd point set (The Hypothesis coNsiDered iN tHis PAper).

PRelIminaRy resuLTs {#SectIon 2}
===================

In this SeCTion we PResent sOME pReliMinary results abouT FiNIte groups actinG on $3$–manIfOLdS.

\[PRop1\] let $g$ be a finite GrOup of ORientatIOn-PRESerVIng diffeomorpHisms of a cloSEd oRientaBlE $3$–maNIfold aNd $f$ an ElEMenT in $G$ with nonEmptY connecteD fixed POint set $k$. then the NormalIzeR $N_G (F)$ of tHE sUbGroUp GEneRAtEd bY $F$ in $g$ is isomoRpHiC to a sUbgrOUP OF a seMidIrecT prodUct $${\Bbb Z}_2 \ltimes ({\bbb z}_a\tiMEs {\BBb Z}_b),$$ fOr somE nonNeGativE integErs $a$ aNd $B$, where a generatoR of ${\BBb Z}_2$ (an $f$–refLecTiOn, iE aCting AS a reflEctIon On $K$ ) acts On the noRMal SuBGROuP ${\Bbb Z}_a \times {\Bbb Z}_b$ of $F$–rOTAtIons (ie thE elemeNTs AcTIng as rotAtIonS on $K$) BY SendiNg eaCH eLement to Its invERsE. IN particUlAr, $N_G(f)$ iS sOlvAblE.

See MECchiA and ZiMmermann [@mZ2 LemMA 1].

\[prop2\] Let $G$ be a fiNIte group of oriENtATIoN-PresErvIng diffeomoRphiSMs of A cloSEd OriENtablE $3$–maniFoLD. IF $g$ is isomorphic to ${\Bbb Z}_2 \TiMes {\Bbb z}_2 \timeS {\Bbb Z}_2$, there exiSts in $G$ an inVOLUtion thaT eitHEr ACts freely or has NoncoNnected fixED point seT.

By coNtradictIon we suppOSE that the SevEn iNvoLutIONs In $G$ have connecTED and NoNempty fIxeD point sEt. LEt $f$ Be oNe oF tHe involutIons, by thE gRoUp $g$ cOntAins fOUr $f$–rotatIoNs aNd FouR $f$–refLEctionS. We deNote By $R$ oNE $f$–rOtation OF oRDEr twO dIfFereNt fRoM $f$ and We deNOte By $t$ one $f$–ReflectioN, so THe foUr $F$ rOtationS are Id, $f,\,r$ and $rf$ AnD the four $f$ rEfLecTions aRE $T,\,tf,\,tr$ and $Tfr$. Since the fixed point seTS of
 the conjecture the use of  homologymay b e i nsu ff icie nt.Probably we ha v e to  consider directly con ditio ns abou t  t he fi xed poi n ts e tsof  t hedi f fe omorp his ms, for  example t heex istence of i n vo lutions wi thconnected no nem pty fi xe d p o int s et(thehypoth e sis co nsideredin this p a per).
P r el imin ary results {#Sec t io n  2}
========== ====== == = 
I n  th issection we  p resen t  some p r el i m i nar y  results abou t finite gr o ups  actin gon$ 3$–man ifold s. 
\[ prop1\] Let  $G$  be a fin ite gr o up of o r ientati on-pre ser vin g di f fe om orp hi s mso fa c l ose d orient ab le  $3$– mani f o l d  and  $f $ an  elem ent in $G$ wi thnone m pty  conn ected  fix ed  poin t set$K$.Th en the normaliz er $ N_G (f)$ofth e s ub group genera ted  by  $f$ in  $G$ is iso mo r p h ic  to a subgroup ofas e mi direct p roduct $$ {\ B bb Z}_2\l tim es ( { \ Bbb Z }_a\ t im es {\Bbb  Z}_b) , $$  f or some  n onnega ti veint egers $a$and $b $, where  a ge n erator of ${\B b b Z}_2$ (an $ f $– r e fl e ctio n,ie acting a s ar efle ctio n  o n $ K $ ) a cts o nt he normal subgroup ${\ Bb b Z}_a  \tim es {\Bbb Z}_b $ of $f$–r o t a tions (i e th e  e l ements actingas ro tations on $K$) bysendi ng eachelement t o its inve rse . I n p art i c ul ar, $N_G(f)$i s  sol va ble.

S eeMecchia  an d Z imm erm an n [@MZ2 L emma 1]. 
\[ pr op 2\]  Let$ G$ be afi nit egro up of orient ation -pre se rv i ngdiffeom o rp h i smsof  a  clo sed  o rient able $3$ –manifo ld. If $G $ i s  iso mo rp hic to${\Bbb Z}_2 \ ti mes {\BbbZ} _2\times { \Bbb Z}_ 2$, there exists in $G$ an invo lut ion t hateither ac tsfreely  or has no nconne ctedfi xed p oints e t. 

B ycontradict i o n w e sup po se t hat the  seven involutions in$G$ have conn ect ed a n d  n one m pt y  fi xe d  po i n t set. Let $f$be one ofth e  i nvolutions ,  by  t he grou p $G$ c ontai n s four$f$–rotat ions andfo ur $ f $ –re flections.  We deno te by $r$ one $ f $– rotat ion  of or de r t wo di fferen t  fr om $f $ andwe  denot e by$t $ one $f $–reflection, so the fo ur $f$  rota tio ns are Id , $ f ,\, r$ and $r f$ a nd the fou r $ f$refle cti o ns ar e $t , \, tf, \ ,tr$and$ tfr$. Sin c ethe f ix ed point se t s of
 the_conjecture the_use of homology may_be insufficient._Probably_we have_to_consider directly conditions_about the fixed_point sets of the_diffeomorphisms, for example_the_existence of involutions with connected nonempty fixed point set (the hypothesis considered in this_paper).

Preliminary_results {#Section_2}
===================

In_this_section we present some preliminary_results about finite groups acting_on $3$–manifolds.

\[prop1\]_Let $G$ be a finite group of orientation-preserving_diffeomorphisms_of a closed_orientable $3$–manifold and $f$ an element in $G$ with_nonempty connected fixed point set $K$._Then the normalizer_$N_G_(f)$_of the subgroup generated_by $f$ in $G$ is isomorphic_to a subgroup of a semidirect_product $${\Bbb Z}_2 \ltimes ({\Bbb Z}_a\times {\Bbb_Z}_b),$$ for some nonnegative integers $a$_and $b$, where a generator_of ${\Bbb_Z}_2$ (an $f$–reflection, ie acting_as a reflection_on $K$_) acts on_the normal subgroup ${\Bbb Z}_a \times_{\Bbb Z}_b$ of_$f$–rotations (ie the elements acting as_rotations_on $K$) by_sending_each_element to_its inverse. In_particular,_$N_G(f)$ is_solvable.

See_Mecchia and Zimmermann [@MZ2 Lemma 1].

\[prop2\]_Let_$G$ be a finite group of orientation-preserving_diffeomorphisms of a closed_orientable_$3$–manifold. If $G$ is_isomorphic to ${\Bbb Z}_2 \times_{\Bbb Z}_2 \times {\Bbb Z}_2$, there_exists in_$G$ an_involution that either acts freely or has nonconnected fixed point set.

By_contradiction we suppose that the seven_involutions in $G$ have_connected and_nonempty_fixed point set._Let_$f$ be_one of the involutions, by the group_$G$ contains_four $f$–rotations and four $f$–reflections. We_denote by $r$ one_$f$–rotation_of order two different from $f$_and we denote by $t$ one_$f$–reflection, so the four $f$_rotations_are_Id, $f,\,r$ and $rf$ and_the four $f$ reflections are $t,\,tf,\,tr$_and $tfr$. Since_the fixed point sets of