hbar/\RC$ and ${\cal
F}_{U}(\oo), {\cal F}_{G}(\oo)$ start to differ. The scattering properties at large energy difference $\hbar\oo\gg\hbar/\tau_\l$ are uncorrelated and the response of the dot is randomized. Therefore both the conductance averaged over a large energy window $\hbar \oo$ and the response of the internal potential $U_\oo$ to the AC voltage at $\oo\dwell \gg 1$ are strongly suppressed, see Table \[tab:table\]. As a result, if $X(\oo)$ is still negligible, both $\Ga^2$ and $\Gs^2$ decrease with growing frequency as $1/\oo^4$.

  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------
                                             Adiabatic                   Intermediate                        High
           $\mbox{Function}$            $\oo\ll\tau_\l^{-1}$   $\tau_\l^{-1}\ll\oo\ll \RC^{-1}$         $\oo\RC\gg 1$
   ${\mathcal F}_U(\oo)\times N_\l^2$            1                   $\pi/(4\oo\tau_\l)$          $\pi/(4\oo^3\tau_\l\RC^2)$
   ${\mathcal F}_G(\oo)\times N_\l^2$            1                                               
                $X(\oo)$                                                $2\tan^2\eta$            
  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------

  : Asymptotes of ${\mathcal F}_{U,\l}(\oo),{\mathcal
  F}_{G,\l}(\oo),X(\oo)$ at $T\to 0$ \[tab:table\]

One could expect that interactions qualitatively change the behavior of $\Ga,\Gs$ when the frequencies become comparable to $1/\RC\sim
NE_c/\hbar$, the scale defined by the interaction strength. At such frequencies the response of a dot to the potentials at the contacts is not resistive as occurs at low frequencies, but mostly capacitive. If the frequency is high, $\oo\RC\gtrsim 1$, we have $\mbox{Re }u_{1,2}\to 0$ and the function ${\mathcal F}_{U}$ in Eq. (\[eq:FU\]) is suppressed $\sim 1/(\oo\RC)^{2}$. As a consequence, $\Ga^2$ is suppressed stronger then $1/\oo^4$ and goes as $1/\oo
hbar/\RC$ and $ { \cal 
 F}_{U}(\oo), { \cal F}_{G}(\oo)$ start to differ. The scattering properties at big department of energy difference $ \hbar\oo\gg\hbar/\tau_\l$ are uncorrelated and the response of the acid is randomize. Therefore both the conductance averaged over a large department of energy windowpane $ \hbar \oo$ and the response of the internal potential $ U_\oo$ to the AC voltage at $ \oo\dwell \gg 1 $ are strongly suppress, see Table \[tab: table\ ]. As a result, if $ X(\oo)$ is even negligible, both $ \Ga^2 $ and $ \Gs^2 $ decrease with grow frequency as $ 1/\oo^4$. 

   ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- 
                                              Adiabatic                    Intermediate                         High 
            $ \mbox{Function}$             $ \oo\ll\tau_\l^{-1}$    $ \tau_\l^{-1}\ll\oo\ll \RC^{-1}$          $ \oo\RC\gg 1 $ 
    $ { \mathcal F}_U(\oo)\times N_\l^2 $             1                    $ \pi/(4\oo\tau_\l)$           $ \pi/(4\oo^3\tau_\l\RC^2)$ 
    $ { \mathcal F}_G(\oo)\times N_\l^2 $             1                                               
                 $ X(\oo)$                                                 $ 2\tan^2\eta$            
   ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- 

  : Asymptotes of $ { \mathcal F}_{U,\l}(\oo),{\mathcal 
   F}_{G,\l}(\oo),X(\oo)$ at $ T\to 0 $ \[tab: table\ ] 

 One could expect that interactions qualitatively change the behavior of $ \Ga,\Gs$ when the frequency become comparable to $ 1/\RC\sim 
 NE_c/\hbar$, the scale defined by the interaction strength. At such frequency the response of a dot to the potentials at the contact is not resistive as occurs at low frequencies, but mostly capacitive. If the frequency is eminent, $ \oo\RC\gtrsim 1 $, we have $ \mbox{Re } u_{1,2}\to 0 $ and the function $ { \mathcal F}_{U}$ in Eq. (\[eq: FU\ ]) is suppressed $ \sim 1/(\oo\RC)^{2}$. As a consequence, $ \Ga^2 $ is suppressed stronger then $ 1/\oo^4 $ and goes as $ 1/\oo
hbag/\RC$ and ${\cal
F}_{U}(\oo), {\cal F}_{G}(\oo)$ start to diffet. Rhe scetterinf propergies at large energy differeice $\ybar\oi\gg\hbar/\tau_\l$ are uncorrdlated anf the rewponww of the dot is rakbomizsf. Thzrxfore both the gonductance averaged over a lcrge energy window $\hbar \oo$ and the rqsponse ov the internal pottntyal $H_\oo$ to the AC voltage at $\oo\dwell \gf 1$ are vtrongly supptessed, see Table \[tab:table\]. Ws a result, if $X(\oo)$ is dtill neglitiblq, both $\Ga^2$ and $\Gs^2$ decrease with growjng frequency as $1/\oo^4$.

  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------
                                             Adiabatic                   Intermediate                        Higi
           $\mbox{Funcjion}$            $\oo\ll\tau_\l^{-1}$   $\tay_\l^{-1}\ol\oo\ln \RC^{-1}$         $\oo\DC\jg 1$
   ${\matjcam F}_U(\oo)\timea N_\l^2$            1                   $\pi/(4\oo\tau_\l)$          $\py/(4\oo^3\tau_\l\RC^2)$
   ${\mathcal F}_G(\oo)\times N_\l^2$            1                                               
                $X(\oo)$                                                $2\twn^2\eta$            
  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------

  : Asymptotes of ${\mathcaj F}_{I,\l}(\po),{\mathcal
  F}_{G,\l}(\jo),X(\oo)$ at $T\tp 0$ \[tsf:table\]

One couud expzdt that interactions qualitwtiveoy change the behavior of $\Ga,\Gs$ when the drequencies yecime comparable to $1/\XC\sim
NE_c/\hbar$, the scalr defined by the interaetion atrength. At such fresjencies the respunsv of a dot to the potentials ae the convacts is not resostive as occurs at low frequencies, but lostli capawitive. If hhe frequency is high, $\oo\RC\gtrsim 1$, we have $\mboc{Ra }u_{1,2}\no 0$ and tke fungtion ${\mathcal F}_{T}$ in Eq. (\[eq:FU\]) ix supprzssed $\rim 1/(\oo\RC)^{2}$. Aa a convequence, $\Ga^2$ is suppresseg stronger thxn $1/\oo^4$ and goew as $1/\oo
hbar/\RC$ and ${\cal F}_{U}(\oo), {\cal F}_{G}(\oo)$ start The properties at energy difference $\hbar\oo\gg\hbar/\tau_\l$ of dot is randomized. both the conductance over a large energy window $\hbar and the response of the internal potential $U_\oo$ to the AC voltage at \gg 1$ are strongly suppressed, see Table \[tab:table\]. As a result, if $X(\oo)$ still both and decrease with growing frequency as $1/\oo^4$. ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- Adiabatic Intermediate High $\mbox{Function}$ $\oo\ll\tau_\l^{-1}$ $\tau_\l^{-1}\ll\oo\ll $\oo\RC\gg 1$ ${\mathcal F}_U(\oo)\times N_\l^2$ 1 $\pi/(4\oo\tau_\l)$ $\pi/(4\oo^3\tau_\l\RC^2)$ F}_G(\oo)\times N_\l^2$ 1 $X(\oo)$ ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- : of F}_{U,\l}(\oo),{\mathcal F}_{G,\l}(\oo),X(\oo)$ $T\to \[tab:table\] could expect that qualitatively change the behavior of $\Ga,\Gs$ when the frequencies become comparable to $1/\RC\sim NE_c/\hbar$, the scale defined the interaction such frequencies response a to the potentials contacts is not resistive as occurs but mostly capacitive. If the frequency is high, 1$, we $\mbox{Re }u_{1,2}\to 0$ and the function F}_{U}$ in Eq. (\[eq:FU\]) is suppressed $\sim 1/(\oo\RC)^{2}$. a consequence, $\Ga^2$ is suppressed stronger then $1/\oo^4$ and goes as $1/\oo
hbar/\RC$ and ${\cal
F}_{U}(\oo), {\cal F}_{G}(\oo)$ stArt to diffeR. The sCatTerInG proPertIes at large enerGY difFerence $\hbar\oo\gg\hbar/\tau_\L$ are uNcORrelATeD and tHe respoNSe OF The DoT iS raNdOMiZed. ThEreFore botH the conducTanCe Averaged over A LaRge energy wIndOw $\hbar \oo$ and tHe rEsponsE oF thE InterNal PotenTial $U_\oO$ To the Ac voltage aT $\oO\Dwell \gG 1$ Are stroNGLy SuppRessed, see Table \[tab:TAbLE\]. As a result, if $X(\oO)$ is stiLl NEgLIGibLe, bOth $\Ga^2$ and $\Gs^2$ DeCreasE With groWInG FREquENcy as $1/\oo^4$.

  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------
                                             AdiabaTic                   IntermedIAte                        high
           $\mbOx{funCTion}$            $\oo\Ll\tau_\L^{-1}$   $\tAU_\l^{-1}\lL\oo\ll \RC^{-1}$         $\oo\RC\Gg 1$
   ${\maThcal F}_U(\oo)\Times N_\L^2$            1                   $\Pi/(4\oo\tau_\L)$          $\Pi/(4\oo^3\tau_\L\RC^2)$
   ${\matHcaL F}_G(\Oo)\tiMEs n_\l^2$            1                                               
                $x(\oo)$                                                $2\TaN^2\Eta$            
  ------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------

  : aSyMptOTes Of ${\mathcaL F}_{u,\l}(\Oo),{\matHcal
  f}_{g,\L}(\OO),X(\oo)$ At $T\To 0$ \[taB:tablE\]

One could expeCt tHat iNTerActioNs quaLitaTiVely cHange tHe behAvIor of $\Ga,\Gs$ when thE freQuencies bEcoMe ComPaRable TO $1/\RC\sim
nE_c/\HbaR$, the scaLe definED by ThE INTeRaction strength. At sUcH FReQuencies The resPOnSe OF a dot to tHe PotEntiALS at thE conTAcTs is not rEsistiVE aS oCcurs at LoW frequEnCieS, buT mostLY capAcitivE. If the frEquenCY is high, $\oo\RC\gtrSIm 1$, we have $\mbox{RE }U_{1,2}\tO 0$ ANd THe fuNctIon ${\mathcal F}_{u}$ in EQ. (\[Eq:FU\]) Is suPPrEssED $\sim 1/(\oO\RC)^{2}$. As A cONsEQuence, $\Ga^2$ is suppresseD sTrongeR then $1/\Oo^4$ and goes as $1/\oo
hbar/\RC$ and ${\cal
F}_{U }(\oo), {\ cal F }_{ G}( \o o)$star t to differ. T h e sc attering properties at  larg ee nerg y  d iffer ence $\ h ba r \ oo\ gg \h bar /\ t au _\l$are  uncorr elated and  th eresponse oft he  dot is ra ndo mized. There for e both  t hec onduc tan ce av eraged over a  large en er g y wind o w $\hba r \o o$ a nd the response o f  t h e internal pot ential  $ U _\ o o $ t o t he AC volt ag e at$ \oo\dwe l l\ g g  1$ are stronglysuppressed, see  Table  \ [ta b :table \]. A sa  re sult, if $X (\oo )$ is sti ll neg l igible, both $\ Ga^2$and  $\ Gs^2 $  d ec rea se wit h  g row i ngfrequenc yas  $1/\ oo^4 $ .   -- --- ---- ----- ------------- --- ---- - - - ----- ----- ---- -- -----  ----- ----- -- --------------- ---- --- ----- --- -- --- -- ----- - ------ -
                                  Ad ia b a ti c             Intermed ia te                Hig h
       $\mbo x{ Functi on }$        $\ oo\ll\ tau_\l^{ -1}$ $\tau_\l^{-1} \ ll\oo\ll \RC^ { -1 } $       $ \oo\RC\gg 1 $
 ${\m athc a lF}_ U (\oo) \time sN _\ l ^2$            1               $\pi/(4\oo \tau_\l)$      $\ pi/( 4 \o o ^3\tau_\l\RC^2 )$
  ${\mathca l  F}_G(\o o)\ti mes N_\l ^2$         1                                 
            $X (\o o) $                                   $2\ tan^2 \ eta$          - --- ------- - -- - - ---- -- -- ---- --- -- --- - ---- - --- ------- ------ -- --- - ---- -- -- ------- -------------  - ---------- -- --- ------ - - ----

 : Asymptotes of ${\math c al F}_{ U,\ l}(\o o),{ \mathcal  F }_{G,\ l}( \ oo),X( \oo)$at $T \t o 0 $ \[tab : t ab le\ ]
One could e xpe ct th at  int eractio ns qualitatively c h ang e the behavio r o f $\ G a ,\ Gs$ wh e n t he fre q u encies become c omparableto $1 /\RC\sim
N E _c/ \h bar$, t he scal e def i ned bythe inter action st re ngth . Atsuch frequ encies t he respon s e ofa  d ot to  th e pote nt ial s atthe co n tac ts is  not r es istive  as o cc urs at l ow frequencies, but mos tly ca pacit ive . If thefre q uen cy is hig h, $ \oo\RC\gtr sim  1$ , wehav e  $\mb ox{R e  } u_{ 1 ,2}\t o 0$ and the f u nc tio n ${ \mathcal F} _ { U }$in Eq . ( \ [eq:FU \])is suppressed $\s i m 1/(\oo\RC)^{ 2}$. A s a  co n sequ en ce, $\Ga^2$ is  su pp r e ssed str on ger then $1 /\oo^4$an d  goes  as $1 /\oo
hbar/\RC$ and_${\cal
F}_{U}(\oo), {\cal_F}_{G}(\oo)$ start to differ._The scattering_properties_at large_energy_difference $\hbar\oo\gg\hbar/\tau_\l$ are_uncorrelated and the_response of the dot_is randomized. Therefore_both_the conductance averaged over a large energy window $\hbar \oo$ and the response of_the_internal potential_$U_\oo$_to_the AC voltage at $\oo\dwell_\gg 1$ are strongly suppressed,_see Table_\[tab:table\]. As a result, if $X(\oo)$ is still_negligible,_both $\Ga^2$ and_$\Gs^2$ decrease with growing frequency as $1/\oo^4$.

  ------------------------------------_---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------
   _  ___   _     _     _      _     _    _ _Adiabatic    _  _ _  _     _Intermediate  _     __  ___ _  __ __High
     __    $\mbox{Function}$  _   __   _$\oo\ll\tau_\l^{-1}$   $\tau_\l^{-1}\ll\oo\ll \RC^{-1}$_     _ _$\oo\RC\gg 1$
_  ${\mathcal F}_U(\oo)\times N_\l^2$      _     1_   _ __  __ _     $\pi/(4\oo\tau_\l)$ _ _     _$\pi/(4\oo^3\tau_\l\RC^2)$
   ${\mathcal_F}_G(\oo)\times_N_\l^2$     _     _1    ___    _     _  _      __     __     ___   
 _     _        $X(\oo)$_  _    ___         _ _  _         _      _     $2\tan^2\eta$     _      
 _------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------

  : Asymptotes_of ${\mathcal F}_{U,\l}(\oo),{\mathcal
 _F}_{G,\l}(\oo),X(\oo)$_at $T\to 0$ \[tab:table\]

One could expect that_interactions_qualitatively_change_the behavior of_$\Ga,\Gs$ when the_frequencies become comparable_to $1/\RC\sim
NE_c/\hbar$,_the scale defined_by the_interaction strength. At_such_frequencies the response of a dot to the potentials at the contacts is not resistive as occurs at_low frequencies, but mostly capacitive. If_the frequency is high, $\oo\RC\gtrsim_1$,_we have $\mbox{Re_}u_{1,2}\to 0$ and the_function ${\mathcal F}_{U}$ in Eq. (\[eq:FU\]) is suppressed_$\sim 1/(\oo\RC)^{2}$. As a consequence, $\Ga^2$ is suppressed stronger_then_$1/\oo^4$ and_goes as $1/\oo