 purpose (e.g. Twitter), were analyzed. The social profile is an element that is present in all of those SNSs. Rohani and Hock state that the type of information included in social profiles differs between different SNSs [@rohani_social_2009]. In their analysis of publicly disclosed Facebook profile information, Farahbakhsh et al. distinguish between personal and interest-based attributes [@farahbakhsh_analysis_2013]. Personal attributes include a friend list, current city, hometown, gender, birthday, employers, college, and high school. Interest-based attributes are music, movie, book, television, games, teams, sports, athletes, activities, interests, and inspirations. Lampe et al. distinguish between three different types of information: referents, interests, and contact [@lampe_familiar_2007]. Referents include verifiable attributes: hometown, high school, residence, concentration. Contact information are also verifiable, for example website, email, address, or birthday. As the authors indicate, interests are less verifiable. Interests include an ’about me’ section, favorite music, movies, TV shows, books, quotes, and political views. As the cited studies in Section \[sec:2:smartphonepersonality\] and also social networking related studies (e.g., [@bao_recommendations_2015]) suggest, more detailed user data additional to the data typically available in a social profile can help improve recommendations in SNSs.

Concept and Prototype {#sec:2:concept}
=====================

Research in psychology and social sciences indicates that homophily in age, education, etc., as well as in personality traits, is a strong indicator for friendship, i.e., for the creation of an edge in a social graph. Several of the aforementioned studies conclude with findings about correlations between smartphone usage and personality traits. Combining those insights, in order to make meaningful recommendations for new connections in an SNS, we can recommend users that show a similar behavioral pattern with their smarthphones. As the existing studies suggest, this will indicate the similarity of their personality traits. Doing this, we do not necessarily need to know which behavior indicates which personality trait.

Such a mechanism for friend recommendations can have several benefits: (1) By logging information about the smartphone usage behavior (a lot of which can be done unobtrusively, see [@beierle_privacy-aware
purpose (e.g. Twitter), were analyzed. The social profile is an chemical element that is present in all of those tin. Rohani and Hock state that the type of data included in social visibility differs between different tin [ @rohani_social_2009 ]. In their analysis of publicly disclosed Facebook profile data, Farahbakhsh et al.   identify between personal and interest - free-base attributes [ @farahbakhsh_analysis_2013 ]. Personal attributes admit a friend list, current city, hometown, sex, birthday, employers, college, and eminent school. sake - based attributes are music, movie, book, television receiver, games, teams, sport, athletes, activity, interests, and inspirations. Lampe et al.   distinguish between three different types of data: referents, interests, and contact [ @lampe_familiar_2007 ]. Referents include verifiable property: hometown, high school, residence, concentration. Contact information are also verifiable, for example website, email, savoir-faire, or birthday. As the writer indicate, pastime are less verifiable. Interests include an ’ about me ’ section, favored music, movies, television shows, books, quotation mark, and political views. As the cited studies in Section   \[sec:2: smartphonepersonality\ ] and also social networking related report (e.g., [ @bao_recommendations_2015 ]) suggest, more detailed user data additional to the data typically available in a social visibility can avail improve recommendations in SNSs. 

 Concept and Prototype { # sec:2: concept } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Research in psychology and social sciences indicate that homophily in age, education, etc. , as well as in personality traits, is a strong indicator for friendship, i.e., for the creation of an edge in a social graph. respective of the aforementioned studies conclude with findings about correlations between smartphone use and personality traits. Combining those penetration, in order to reach meaningful recommendations for modern connections in an SNS, we can recommend users that show a similar behavioral form with their smarthphones. As the existing study suggest, this will indicate the similarity of their personality traits. Doing this, we do not necessarily need to acknowledge which behavior indicates which personality trait. 

 Such a mechanism for ally recommendations can have several benefits: (1) By logging information about the smartphone custom behavior (a lot of which can be done unobtrusively, see [ @beierle_privacy - aware
 pugpose (e.g. Twitter), were anxlyzed. The socico profmle is zn elemevt that is present in all of tyose WNSs. Rohani and Hock sgate that the typw of unformatioi includcb in alcian profiles diffgrs between gifferent SNSs [@ruhcni_social_2009]. In their analysis of publisly disvllsed Facebook krofikq inrormation, Farahbakhsh et al. distinghish beuween personal and interest-based attributes [@varajbakhsh_analysis_2013]. Pegsonal attrubutqw include a wriend lisu, eurrent citi, hometown, gender, birthday, emplohers, eollege, and hugh vchool. Intecest-bafed attributcx are kusic, mpvie, book, teleyisioi, ganes, teams, sports, athlxtes, activities, intetests, and hnapirations. Lampe wt al. divtincuisf begwetn vhrse difverxnt types or informatiin: referents, interextf, and contact [@mampe_fwmyliar_2007]. Referents include verifiable attrpbutss: hometown, high school, residence, concentratlon. Contast information are also verifiable, for example wetsite, dmano, addfwsd, or birthday. As the authors indicate, interesea srv less verifiable. Interests onfliqe an ’about mg’ section, ravorite music, movles, TV fhows, books, qujtes, and political views. As the cited studivs ib Section \[sec:2:smartpkonepersonalnty\] anc alsp social networking relcted sfudies (e.g., [@bwo_recommehaations_2015]) suggest, oorv dedailed user data additionaj to the vata cypicallh avsilablq in a soclal pvmfile can help impgove tecommandations ln SNSs.

Concept and Prototype {#ser:2:roncept}
=====================

Researvh in psycholjgy akd social scienses indicates jhat homo'hily kn age, edubation, etr., as well as in personalidi traits, is a strong yndixatoe for ffkendship, i.e., fot the crecuion of an edge in a social nraph. Aeveral of the cyotwmentioned stucier cjnbluve wiev findings atout coftelatkons beuceek soartlhone usage and persmnaljty traits. Combinimg those ibsights, yn order to mske meaningful reclmmenvationr for ner connections in an SNS, we can recommenf ufers that shjw a similar behcvioral pattern with their smarthphones. Es the existing studies suggest, this will nncicate the ximilwrity of dheir personality trqits. Doing this, wt do not necessarily nesd to nnow ahich behavior indicates which personality trait.

Such a mechanism for friebd recommendations can have szvexal benqfitd: (1) By logging infprmation about the smartphone urage behdvnor (a lot of which can be donr jnobtrusively, see [@beierle_privacy-aware
purpose (e.g. Twitter), were analyzed. The social an that is in all of state the type of included in social differs between different SNSs [@rohani_social_2009]. In analysis of publicly disclosed Facebook profile information, Farahbakhsh et al. distinguish between personal interest-based attributes [@farahbakhsh_analysis_2013]. Personal attributes include a friend list, current city, hometown, gender, employers, and school. attributes are music, movie, book, television, games, teams, sports, athletes, activities, interests, and inspirations. Lampe et distinguish between three different types of information: referents, and contact [@lampe_familiar_2007]. Referents verifiable attributes: hometown, high school, concentration. information are verifiable, example email, address, or As the authors indicate, interests are less verifiable. Interests include an ’about me’ section, favorite music, movies, shows, books, political views. the studies Section \[sec:2:smartphonepersonality\] and networking related studies (e.g., [@bao_recommendations_2015]) suggest, data additional to the data typically available in social profile help improve recommendations in SNSs. Concept Prototype {#sec:2:concept} ===================== Research in psychology and social indicates that homophily in age, education, etc., as well as in personality traits, is a for friendship, i.e., for creation of an in social Several the aforementioned conclude with findings about correlations between smartphone usage and personality traits. those insights, in order to make meaningful recommendations for new an we can recommend that show a similar pattern their smarthphones. As the suggest, will of personality Doing this, we do necessarily need to know which indicates which personality trait. recommendations can have several benefits: (1) By logging about the smartphone usage behavior (a lot which can be done unobtrusively, see [@beierle_privacy-aware
 purpose (e.g. Twitter), were analyZed. The sociAl proFilE is An ElemEnt tHat is present in ALl of Those SNSs. Rohani and Hock State ThAT the TYpE of inFormatiON iNCLudEd In SocIaL PrOfileS diFfers beTween diffeRenT SnSs [@rohani_socIAl_2009]. in their anaLysIs of publicly DisClosed faCebOOk proFilE infoRmatioN, farahbAkhsh et al. DiSTinguiSH betweeN PErSonaL and interest-based ATtRIbutes [@farahbakHsh_anaLySIs_2013]. pERsoNal Attributes InClude A Friend lISt, CURRenT City, hometown, gEnder, birthdAY, emPloyerS, cOllEGe, and hIgh scHoOL. InTerest-based AttrIbutes are Music, mOVie, book, TElevisiOn, gameS, teAms, SporTS, aThLetEs, ACtiVItIes, INteRests, and InSpIratiOns. LAMPE Et al. DisTingUish bEtween three diFfeRent TYpeS of inFormaTion: ReFerenTs, inteRests, AnD contact [@lampe_faMiliAr_2007]. ReferenTs iNcLudE vErifiABle attRibUteS: hometoWn, high sCHooL, rESIDeNce, concentration. CoNtACT iNformatiOn are aLSo VeRIfiable, fOr ExaMple WEBsite, EmaiL, AdDress, or bIrthdaY. as ThE authorS iNdicatE, iNteResTs are LEss vErifiaBle. InterEsts iNClude an ’about me’ SEction, favoritE MuSIC, mOVies, tV sHows, books, quOtes, ANd poLitiCAl VieWS. As thE citeD sTUdIEs in Section \[sec:2:smartPhOneperSonalIty\] and also socIal networkING Related sTudiES (e.G., [@Bao_recommendatIons_2015]) sUggest, more DEtailed uSer daTa additiOnal to the DATa typicaLly AvaIlaBle IN A sOcial profile cAN Help ImProve reComMendatiOns In SnSs.

conCePt and ProtOtype {#sec:2:CoNcEpT}
=====================

REseArch iN PsycholoGy And SoCiaL scieNCes indIcateS thaT hOmOPhiLy in age, EDuCATion, EtC., aS welL as In PersoNaliTY trAits, is a Strong indIcaTOr foR fRiEndship, I.e., for the creatIoN of an edge iN a SocIal graPH. several oF the aforementioned studiES concluDe wIth fiNdinGs about coRreLationS beTWeen smArtphoNe usaGe And PERsonaLITy TraItS. Combining THOse InsigHtS, in oRder to mAke meaningful recomMEndAtions for new cOnnEctiONS iN an snS, WE caN rEComMENd users that show A similar beHaVIoRal pattern WIth ThEir smarThphoneS. As thE ExistinG studies sUggest, thiS wIll iNDIcaTe the similArity of tHeir persoNAlity TRaIts. DoIng This, we Do Not NecesSarily NEed To knoW which BeHavior IndicAtEs which pErsonality trait.

Such a mecHanism For frIenD recommenDatIOns Can have seVeraL benefits: (1) BY loGgiNg infOrmATion aBout THe SmaRTphonE usaGE behavior (A LoT of WHIcH can be done uNOBTruSivelY, seE [@BeierlE_priVacy-aware
 purpose (e.g. Twitter), w ere analyz ed. T hesoc ia l pr ofil e is an elemen t  tha t is present in all of  thos eS NSs. Ro haniand Hoc k  s t a teth at  th et yp e ofinf ormatio n included  in  s ocial profil e sdiffers be twe en different  SN Ss [@r oh ani _ socia l_2 009].  In th e ir ana lysis ofpu b liclyd isclose d Fa cebo ok profile inform a ti o n, Farahbakhsh  et al .d is t i ngu ish  between p er sonal and int e re s t - bas e d attributes[@farahbakh s h_a nalysi s_ 201 3 ]. Per sonal  a t tri butes inclu de a  friend l ist, c u rrent c i ty, hom etown,  ge nde r, b i rt hd ay,  e m plo y er s,c oll ege, and  h ig h sch ool. I n t eres t-b ased  attr ibutes are mu sic , mo v ie,  book , tel evis io n, ga mes, t eams,  s ports, athletes , ac tivities,  in te res ts , and inspir ati ons . Lampe  et al. dis ti n g u is h between three di ff e r en t typesof inf o rm at i on: refe re nts , in t e rests , an d  c ontact [ @lampe _ fa mi liar_20 07 ]. Ref er ent s i nclud e  ver ifiabl e attrib utes: hometown, high school, resid e nc e ,  c o ncen tra tion. Conta ct i n form atio n  a rea lso v erifi ab l e, for example website ,email,  addr ess, or birth day. As th e a uthors i ndic a te ,  interests are  less  verifiabl e . Intere sts i nclude a n ’aboutm e ’ sectio n,fav ori tem u si c, movies, TV s hows ,books,quo tes, an d p oli tic alvi ews. As t he cited  s tu di es  in  Sect i on \[sec :2 :sm ar tph onepe r sonali ty\]andal so soc ial net w or k i ng r el at ed s tud ie s (e. g.,[ @ba o_recom mendation s_2 0 15])  s ug gest, m ore detailedus er data ad di tio nal to t he datatypically available ina  social  pr ofile  can  help imp rov e reco mme n dation s in S NSs.
C onc e p t and P ro tot yp e {#sec:2: c o nce pt}
= == ==== ======= =======

Researchi n p sychology and  so cial s ci enc e si ndi ca t est h at homophily in  age, educ at i on , etc., as wel las in p ersonal ity t r aits, i s a stron g indicat or  for f rie ndship, i. e., forthe creat i on of an  edge  in  a soc ia l g raph.  Sever a l o f the  afore me ntione d stu di es concl ude with findings about  corre latio nsbetween s mar t pho ne usageandpersonalit y t rai ts. C omb i ningthos e  i nsi g hts,in o r der to ma k emea n i ng ful recomme n d a tio ns fo r n e w conn ecti ons in an SNS, we can recommenduser s tha t s h ow a  s imilar behavio ral  p a t tern wit htheir smart hphones.  A s  theexisti ng stu dies su g g es t , this  wil l i ndicate t hesi m ilarity  o ft heir p erso na lity t raits. Doin g this, we do notneces s a rilyn eed  to k no w which beha vior indic ates whichperson alit y tra it.

Su ch  a mec han is m for frie n d recomme ndati ons can  h avesev eral b enef i t s: (1 ) By  l ogg ing infor m a ti o nab o utthesmart ph oneusage beh a vior (alot of whic hcan b e done un o b trusively,  se e [@b e i erle_priva c y-aw a re 
 purpose_(e.g. Twitter),_were analyzed. The social_profile is_an_element that_is_present in all_of those SNSs._Rohani and Hock state_that the type_of_information included in social profiles differs between different SNSs [@rohani_social_2009]. In their analysis of_publicly_disclosed Facebook_profile_information,_Farahbakhsh et al. distinguish between personal_and interest-based attributes [@farahbakhsh_analysis_2013]. Personal_attributes include_a friend list, current city, hometown, gender, birthday,_employers,_college, and high_school. Interest-based attributes are music, movie, book, television, games,_teams, sports, athletes, activities, interests, and_inspirations. Lampe et_al. distinguish_between_three different types of_information: referents, interests, and contact [@lampe_familiar_2007]._Referents include verifiable attributes: hometown, high_school, residence, concentration. Contact information are also_verifiable, for example website, email, address,_or birthday. As the authors_indicate, interests_are less verifiable. Interests include_an ’about me’_section, favorite_music, movies, TV_shows, books, quotes, and political views._As the cited_studies in Section \[sec:2:smartphonepersonality\] and also social_networking_related studies (e.g.,_[@bao_recommendations_2015])_suggest,_more detailed_user data additional_to_the data_typically_available in a social profile can_help_improve recommendations in SNSs.

Concept and Prototype {#sec:2:concept}
=====================

Research_in psychology and social_sciences_indicates that homophily in_age, education, etc., as well_as in personality traits, is a_strong indicator_for friendship,_i.e., for the creation of an edge in a social graph._Several of the aforementioned studies conclude_with findings about correlations_between smartphone_usage_and personality traits._Combining_those insights,_in order to make meaningful recommendations for_new connections_in an SNS, we can recommend_users that show a_similar_behavioral pattern with their smarthphones. As_the existing studies suggest, this will_indicate the similarity of their_personality_traits._Doing this, we do not_necessarily need to know which behavior_indicates which personality_trait.

Such a mechanism for friend recommendations can_have_several benefits: (1) By logging information_about_the smartphone usage behavior (a lot_of_which_can be done unobtrusively, see_[@beierle_privacy-aware