 $BV$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_iso\]), possibly due to the higher sensitivity to a binary presence. It is quite possible that several undetected spectroscopic binaries are still hidden in our sample of bona fide cluster members. Some other reasons for this scatter may include source confusion and different photometric measurement reductions for stars brighter and fainter than $J\sim9$ [@cut03].

In the $J\!K$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_2mass\]), we overplotted 40 and 100 Myr solar metallicity isochrones from @bon04 using the same distance modulus as for the initial ZAMS fit in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_zams\], i.e., $V_{0}-M_{V}$=5.95. Only a handful of stars are located right on the 40 Myr isochrone, which itself poorly fits the upper main sequence. The best fit with a 100 Myr isochrone is most likely compromised by some bias in the 2MASS photometry at bright magnitudes and/or by using a $T_{\rm eff}$-color transformation that is somewhat uncertain in this magnitude range. Thus, choosing a 100 Myr isochrone helps to eliminate the mismatch at the bright end of main sequence; however, it is very unlikely that IC 2391 is indeed that old.

Following the referee’s suggestion we investigated the $V\!K$ color-magnitude diagram. In these colors it is expected that the K dwarf ‘blueshift’ in the CMD would disappear [@sta03]. Our $V\!K$ CMD for bona fide cluster members is given in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_vk\_iso\]. We attempted to fit this CMD with 30,35,40,45,50,55-Myr isochrones; however, a relatively poor match to the essential part of main sequence comprising F-G spectral type stars ($0.3\le~V-K_s\le1.5$) prevented us from improving the distance modulus over a similar fit of the $BV$ CMD. Hence, we adopted the distance modulus of $V_0-M_V=6.01$ obtained from the $BV$ CMD. It is difficult to judge what causes the scatter across the main sequence and the offset of its upper portion. Possibly, the 2MASS photometry contributes to these effects, but we also cannot entirely rule out small isochrone calibration problems for
$ BV$ CMD (Fig.   \[fig: cmd\_iso\ ]), possibly due to the higher sensitivity to a binary presence. It is quite possible that several undetected spectroscopic binary star are however hidden in our sample of bona fide cluster member. Some other reasons for this scatter may admit source confusion and different photometric measurement reductions for star brighter and fainter than $ J\sim9 $ [ @cut03 ]. 

 In the $ J\!K$ CMD (Fig.   \[fig: cmd\_2mass\ ]), we overplotted 40 and 100   Myr solar metallicity isochrones from @bon04 using the like distance modulus as for the initial ZAMS fit in Fig.   \[fig: cmd\_zams\ ], i.e., $ V_{0}-M_{V}$=5.95. Only a handful of stars are located justly on the 40   Myr isochrone, which itself poorly fits the upper main sequence. The best paroxysm with a 100   Myr isochrone is most likely compromised by some diagonal in the 2MASS photometry at bright magnitudes and/or by practice a $ T_{\rm eff}$-color transformation that is somewhat unsealed in this magnitude range. Thus, choosing a 100   Myr isochrone helps to rule out the mismatch at the bright end of main sequence; however, it is very unlikely that IC   2391 is indeed that old. 

 Following the referee ’s suggestion we investigated the $ V\!K$ color - magnitude diagram. In these colors it is expected that the K dwarf ‘ blueshift ’ in the CMD would disappear [ @sta03 ]. Our $ V\!K$ CMD for bona fide cluster member is given in Fig.   \[fig: cmd\_vk\_iso\ ]. We attempted to match this CMD with 30,35,40,45,50,55 - Myr isochrone; however, a relatively poor match to the essential part of main sequence comprising F - G apparitional type stars ($ 0.3\le ~ V - K_s\le1.5 $) prevented us from improving the distance modulus over a similar fit of the $ BV$ CMD. Hence, we adopted the distance modulus of $ V_0 - M_V=6.01 $ obtained from the $ BV$ CMD. It is difficult to judge what cause the scatter across the main succession and the beginning of its upper portion. Possibly, the 2MASS photometry contributes to these effects, but we also cannot entirely rule out small isochrone calibration trouble for
 $BV$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_iso\]), possibuy due to the hnther sxnsitivjty to a binary presence. It is quite pissiboe that several undetezted specnroscopic bineries are still ijdden ik our dampnx of bona fide gluster memters. Some othes fecsons for this scatter may include sjurce cpnvusion and difsereme phknonetric measurement reductions for sters brighter anc fainter than $J\sim9$ [@cut03].

In hhe $U\!K$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_2mads\]), we overpoottqe 40 and 100 Myr sular metallicity isochtones from @bon04 using the same dirtancz modulus aw dor jhe initial VAMS fpt in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_zams\], i.a., $V_{0}-M_{V}$=5.95. Omly a handful pf vtaes are located right mn the 40 Myr isochroge, which htaelf poorly fits rhw uppgr mahn sdwuevce. Tie gest flt xith a 100 Myr jsochrone iw most likely comprpmywed by some bjas in tre 2MASS photometry at bright magnitudes ans/or by using a $T_{\rm eff}$-cilor transformation tjat is soiewhat uncertain in this magnitude range. Thus, chomsing x 100 Mvv kwofhrone helps to eliminate the mismatch at the grogmt end of main scquence; however, it id fgry unlikely tfat IC 2391 is indeed that old.

Foplowing the eeferee’s fuggrstion we investigated the $C\!K$ color-magnptudw diagram. In these colors it ns expgcted yhat the K dwarf ‘blueshnft’ in the CMD wokld disapldar [@sta03]. Our $V\!K$ COD nor bona fide cluster members is given in Yig. \[fig:cma\_vk\_ixo\]. We wttempted ho fib this CMD with 30,35,40,45,50,55-Myr isockronev; however, w relatively poor match to the xxsential parj ox mdin sequznce cpmprising F-G fpectral type xtars ($0.3\lz~V-K_s\le1.5$) prevented us frok improving the distance lodulus over a similwr fut od the $BX$ CMD. Hence, we sdopted tkt distance modulus of $V_0-M_V=6.01$ obbainea from the $BV$ CMB. Ut is difficult to juqgv wiat cwgses the scadter acfpss tfe main seqmenze amd the offset of its uppsr portion. Possiblu, bhe 2MASS khotometrr contributes to these effects, hut wx also cannpt gntirely rule out small isochrohe calibrwtijn problems sor
$BV$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_iso\]), possibly due to sensitivity a binary It is quite binaries still hidden in sample of bona cluster members. Some other reasons for scatter may include source confusion and different photometric measurement reductions for stars brighter fainter than $J\sim9$ [@cut03]. In the $J\!K$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_2mass\]), we overplotted 40 100 solar isochrones @bon04 using the same distance modulus as for the initial ZAMS fit in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_zams\], i.e., Only a handful of stars are located right the 40 Myr isochrone, itself poorly fits the upper sequence. best fit a Myr is most likely by some bias in the 2MASS photometry at bright magnitudes and/or by using a $T_{\rm eff}$-color transformation is somewhat this magnitude Thus, a Myr isochrone helps the mismatch at the bright end however, it is very unlikely that IC 2391 indeed that Following the referee’s suggestion we investigated $V\!K$ color-magnitude diagram. In these colors it is that the K dwarf ‘blueshift’ in the CMD would disappear [@sta03]. Our $V\!K$ CMD for cluster members is given Fig. \[fig:cmd\_vk\_iso\]. We to this with isochrones; however, relatively poor match to the essential part of main sequence comprising spectral type stars ($0.3\le~V-K_s\le1.5$) prevented us from improving the distance a fit of the CMD. Hence, we adopted distance of $V_0-M_V=6.01$ obtained from CMD. is what the across the main sequence the offset of its upper Possibly, the 2MASS photometry we also cannot entirely rule out small isochrone problems for
 $BV$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_iso\]), possibly Due to the hiGher sEnsItiViTy to A binAry presence. It iS QuitE possible that several unDetecTeD SpecTRoScopiC binariES aRE StiLl HiDdeN iN OuR sampLe oF bona fiDe cluster mEmbErS. Some other reASoNs for this sCatTer may includE soUrce coNfUsiON and dIffErent PhotomETric meAsurement ReDUctionS For starS BRiGhteR and fainter than $J\sIM9$ [@cUT03].

In the $J\!K$ CMD (Fig. \[Fig:cmd\_2MaSS\]), wE OVerPloTted 40 and 100 Myr SoLar meTAllicitY IsOCHRonES from @bon04 using The same distANce ModuluS aS foR The iniTial ZaMs Fit In Fig. \[fig:cmd\_Zams\], I.e., $V_{0}-M_{V}$=5.95. Only A handfUL of starS Are locaTed rigHt oN thE 40 Myr ISoChRonE, wHIch ITsElf POorLy fits thE uPpEr maiN seqUENCE. The BesT fit With a 100 myr isochrone iS moSt liKEly ComprOmiseD by sOmE bias In the 2MaSS phOtOmetry at bright mAgniTudes and/oR by UsIng A $T_{\Rm eff}$-COlor trAnsForMation tHat is soMEwhAt UNCErTain in this magnitudE rANGe. thus, chooSing a 100 MYR iSoCHrone helPs To eLimiNATe the MismATcH at the brIght enD Of MaIn sequeNcE; howevEr, It iS veRy unlIKely That IC 2391 Is indeed That oLD.

Following the rEFeree’s suggestIOn WE InVEstiGatEd the $V\!K$ coloR-magNItudE diaGRaM. In THese cOlors It IS eXPected that the K dwarf ‘BlUeshifT’ in thE CMD would disaPpear [@sta03]. OuR $v\!k$ cMD for boNa fiDE cLUster members is Given In Fig. \[fig:cmD\_Vk\_iso\]. We aTtempTed to fit This CMD wiTH 30,35,40,45,50,55-myr isochRonEs; hOweVer, A RElAtively poor maTCH to tHe EssentiAl pArt of maIn sEquEncE coMpRising F-G sPectral tYpE sTaRs ($0.3\Le~V-k_s\le1.5$) pREvented uS fRom ImProVing tHE distaNce moDuluS oVeR A siMilar fiT Of THE $BV$ CmD. heNce, wE adOpTed thE disTAncE moduluS of $V_0-M_V=6.01$ obtAinED froM tHe $bV$ CMD. It Is difficult to JuDge what cauSeS thE scattER Across thE main sequence and the offsET of its uPpeR portIon. POssibly, thE 2MAsS photOmeTRy contRibuteS to thEsE efFECts, buT WE aLso CaNnot entireLY RulE out sMaLl isOchrone Calibration problemS For
 $BV$ CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\ _iso\]), p ossib lydue  t o th e hi gher sensitivi t y to  a binary presence. It  is q ui t e po s si ble t hat sev e ra l und et ec ted  s p ec trosc opi c binar ies are st ill  h idden in our sa mple of bo nafide cluster  me mbers.  S ome other  re asons  for t h is sca tter mayin c lude s o urce co n f us ionand different pho t om e tric measureme nt red uc t io n s  fo r s tars brigh te r and fainter th a n $J\ s im9$ [@cut03] .

In the $ J \!K $ CMD(F ig. \[fig: cmd\_ 2m a ss\ ]), we over plot ted 40 an d 100M yr sola r  metall icityiso chr ones fr om  @b on 0 4 u s in g t h e s ame dist an ce  modu lusa s f or t heinit ial Z AMS fit in Fi g.\[fi g :cm d\_za ms\],  i.e .,  $V_{ 0}-M_{ V}$=5 .9 5. Only a handf ul o f stars a relo cat ed  righ t  on th e 4 0 M yr isoc hrone,w hic hi t s el f poorly fits theup p e rmain seq uence. Th eb est fitwi tha 10 0 Myr i soch r on e is mos t like l yco mpromis ed  by so me  bi asin th e  2MA SS pho tometryat br i ght magnitudes and/or by usi n ga $T _ {\rm  ef f}$-color t rans f orma tion th ati s som ewhat  u n ce r tain in this magnit ud e rang e. Th us, choosinga 100 Myri s o chrone h elps to eliminate themisma tch at the bright e nd of  main se quence; h o w ever, it  is  ve ryunl i k el y that IC 239 1 is i nd eed tha t o ld.

Fo llo win g t here feree’s s uggestio nwe  i nv est igate d  the $V\ !K $ c ol or- magni t ude di agram . In  t he s e c olors i t  i s expe ct ed  tha t t he  K dw arf‘ blu eshift’  in the C MDw ould  d is appear[@sta03]. Our  $ V\!K$ CMDfo r b ona fi d e  cluster  members is given in Fi g . \[fig :cm d\_vk \_is o\]. We a tte mptedtof it thi s CMDwith30 ,35 , 4 0,45, 5 0 ,5 5-M yr  isochrone s ;  ho wever ,a re lativel y poor match to th e  es sential partofmain s eq uen c ec omp ri s ing F -G spectral typ e stars ($ 0. 3 \l e~V-K_s\le 1 .5$ )prevent ed us f rom i m proving  the dist ance modu lu s ov e r  asimilar fi t of the  $BV$ CMD .  Henc e ,we ad opt ed the  d ist ancemodulu s  of  $V_0 -M_V=6 .0 1$ obt ained  f rom the$BV$ CMD. It is difficu lt tojudge  wh at causes  th e  sc atter acr ossthe main s equ enc e and  th e  offs et o f  i tsu pperport i on. Possi b ly , t h e  2 MASS photom e t r y c ontri but e s to t hese  effects, but wea lso cannot ent irel y rul e o u t sm al l isochrone ca lib ra t i on probl em s for
 $BV$_CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_iso\]),_possibly due to the_higher sensitivity_to_a binary_presence._It is quite_possible that several_undetected spectroscopic binaries are_still hidden in_our_sample of bona fide cluster members. Some other reasons for this scatter may include_source_confusion and_different_photometric_measurement reductions for stars brighter_and fainter than $J\sim9$ [@cut03].

In_the $J\!K$_CMD (Fig. \[fig:cmd\_2mass\]), we overplotted 40 and 100 Myr solar_metallicity_isochrones from @bon04_using the same distance modulus as for the initial_ZAMS fit in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_zams\], i.e., $V_{0}-M_{V}$=5.95._Only a handful_of_stars_are located right on_the 40 Myr isochrone, which itself poorly_fits the upper main sequence. The_best fit with a 100 Myr isochrone is_most likely compromised by some bias_in the 2MASS photometry at_bright magnitudes_and/or by using a $T_{\rm_eff}$-color transformation that_is somewhat_uncertain in this_magnitude range. Thus, choosing a 100 Myr_isochrone helps to_eliminate the mismatch at the bright_end_of main sequence;_however,_it_is very_unlikely that IC 2391_is_indeed that_old.

Following_the referee’s suggestion we investigated the_$V\!K$_color-magnitude diagram. In these colors it is_expected that the K_dwarf_‘blueshift’ in the CMD_would disappear [@sta03]. Our $V\!K$_CMD for bona fide cluster members_is given_in Fig. \[fig:cmd\_vk\_iso\]._We attempted to fit this CMD with 30,35,40,45,50,55-Myr isochrones; however, a_relatively poor match to the essential_part of main sequence_comprising F-G_spectral_type stars ($0.3\le~V-K_s\le1.5$)_prevented_us from_improving the distance modulus over a similar_fit of_the $BV$ CMD. Hence, we adopted_the distance modulus of_$V_0-M_V=6.01$_obtained from the $BV$ CMD. It_is difficult to judge what causes_the scatter across the main_sequence_and_the offset of its upper_portion. Possibly, the 2MASS photometry contributes_to these effects,_but we also cannot entirely rule out_small_isochrone calibration problems for