irste:Sience338:1060; @Zastrow:NatChem6:216; @Vogels:SCIENCE350:787]. For multi-stage Zeeman decelerators, several advanced switching protocols have been proposed and tested to mitigate losses. Wiederkehr *et al.* extensively investigated phase stability in a Zeeman decelerator, particularly including the role of the nonzero rise and fall times of the current pulses, as well as the influence of the operation phase angle [@Wiederkehr:JCP135:214202; @Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]. Evolutionary algorithms were developed to optimize the switching pulse sequence, significantly increasing the number of particles that exit from the decelerator. Furthermore, inspired by the $s=3$ mode of a Stark decelerator, alternative strategies for solenoid arrangements were investigated numerically [@Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]. Dulitz *et al.* developed a model for the overall 6D phase-space acceptance of a Zeeman decelerator, from which optimal parameter sets can be derived to operate the decelerator at minimum loss [@Dulitz:PRA91:013409]. Dulitz *et al.* also proposed and implemented schemes to improve the transverse focusing properties of a Zeeman decelerator by applying reversed current pulses to selected solenoids [@Dulitz:JCP140:104201]. Yet, despite the substantial improvements these methods can offer, the phase-stable operation of a multi-stage Zeeman decelerator over a large range of velocities remains challenging.

Recently, a very elegant approach emerged that can be used to overcome these intrinsic limitations of multi-stage decelerators. So-called traveling wave decelerators employ spatially moving electrostatic or magnetic traps to confine part of the molecular beam in one or multiple wells that start traveling at the speed of the molecular beam pulse and are subsequently gradually slowed down. In this approach the molecules are confined in genuine potential wells, and stay confined in these wells until the final velocity is reached. Consequently, these decelerators are inherently phase stable, and no losses occur due to couplings of motions during the deceleration process. The acceptances are almost equal in both the longitudinal and transverse directions, which appears to be particularly advantageous for experiments that are designed to spatially trap the molecules at the end of the decelerator. Both traveling wave Stark [@Osterwalder:PRA81:051401
irste: Sience338:1060; @Zastrow: NatChem6:216; @Vogels: SCIENCE350:787 ]. For multi - stage Zeeman decelerators, several advanced switching protocols have been aim and quiz to mitigate losses. Wiederkehr * et al. * extensively investigated phase constancy in a Zeeman decelerator, particularly including the role of the nonzero wax and fall times of the current pulsation, as well as the influence of the operation phase slant [ @Wiederkehr: JCP135:214202; @Wiederkehr: PRA82:043428 ]. Evolutionary algorithms were developed to optimize the switching pulse succession, significantly increasing the numeral of particles that exit from the decelerator. Furthermore, inspire by the $ s=3 $ mode of a Stark decelerator, alternative strategies for solenoid placement were investigated numerically [ @Wiederkehr: PRA82:043428 ]. Dulitz * et al. * developed a model for the overall 6D phase - space credence of a Zeeman decelerator, from which optimal parameter sets can be derived to operate the decelerator at minimal loss [ @Dulitz: PRA91:013409 ]. Dulitz * et al. * also proposed and implemented schemes to improve the cross concentrate properties of a Zeeman decelerator by applying reversed current pulses to selected solenoids [ @Dulitz: JCP140:104201 ]. Yet, despite the substantial improvements these method can offer, the phase - stable mathematical process of a multi - stage Zeeman decelerator over a big range of velocities remains challenge. 

 Recently, a very elegant approach emerged that can be used to overcome these intrinsic limitation of multi - stage decelerators. So - called traveling wave decelerators employ spatially move electrostatic or magnetic traps to confine part of the molecular radio beam in one or multiple wells that originate traveling at the speed of the molecular beam pulse and are subsequently gradually slowed down. In this overture the molecules are confined in genuine likely wells, and persist confined in these wells until the concluding velocity is reached. Consequently, these decelerators are inherently phase stable, and no losses occur ascribable to couplings of motions during the deceleration process. The acceptances are about equal in both the longitudinal and transverse focus, which appears to be particularly advantageous for experiments that are designed to spatially trap the atom at the end of the decelerator. Both traveling wave Stark [ @Osterwalder: PRA81:051401
irshe:Sience338:1060; @Zastrow:NatChem6:216; @Yogels:SCIENCE350:787]. Fot nulti-svage Zesman decdlerators, several advanced sxitcying kgotocols have been pruposed anf tested to nutigate losses. Wiederkehd *et cl.* extensively ikvestigated phase stabilidy iu a Zeeman decelerator, particularly yncludimg the role of tre npgzerk rise and fall times of the curreht pulsts, as well as the onfluence of the operation phade angle [@Wiederkehg:JCP135:214202; @Wiederjehr:[EA82:043428]. Evolutionxry algoriuhks were debeloped to optimize the switchivg pukse sequenxe, sihtificantly mncreafing the numnvr of pdrticlex that exit frpm vhe eecelerator. Furthermoce, inspired by the $s=3$ mode of d Atark decelerator, aoterndtiva stfqteeiea hor solenlid arrangemehts were incestigated numericaklr [@Wiederkehr:PRZ82:043428]. Duliez *et al.* developed a model for the overaln 6D phase-space acceptance if a Zeeman deceleratlr, from wrich optimal parameter sets can be derived to opesate vhd dtccjdeahor at minimum loss [@Dulitz:PRA91:013409]. Dulitz *et al.* alfk kroiosed and implemekted schemes to imlrlvr the transverre focbaihg properties of a Zeeman deceoerator br apllying reversed current pulwes to selecned wolenoids [@Dulitz:JC'140:104201]. Yet, despitz the xubstsntial improvements there msthods can lffer, the ohase-stable operxtipn of a multi-stage Zeeman deselerator ovex a largd ramge of velocitied remains challenging.

Recfntly, a very elegwnt approach emerged that can bx used to ovetcoke nhese intxinsic limitations jf multi-stage beceleracors. Su-called trzveling wave decelqrators emplof spatially mmving elqctristaric or oxgnetic traps yo confinv kart of thw molecular beam ik one kr multiple welos uhqt start travekine ae nhe s[aed of the mmlecjlaf beam pulse and crd sunsequently gradually slosed down. In this alpvoach the moleculqs are confinrd in genuine potejtial weuls, amd ftay confined in these wells uhtil the vinwl velocity ys rcachgd. Consequeutly, these decelerators are inherently piase stable, and no lossws occur due to couklikgs of motiois duryng the daceleration process. Rhe acceptances ave almost equal in botg the nongihudinal and transverse directions, which appears to be particularly advantqgeous for experimsnts that axe besigneq to rpatially trap tne molecules at the end of the veceleratos. Yoth traveling wave Stark [@Ostrrdalder:PRA81:051401
irste:Sience338:1060; @Zastrow:NatChem6:216; @Vogels:SCIENCE350:787]. For multi-stage Zeeman decelerators, switching have been and tested to extensively phase stability in Zeeman decelerator, particularly the role of the nonzero rise fall times of the current pulses, as well as the influence of the phase angle [@Wiederkehr:JCP135:214202; @Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]. Evolutionary algorithms were developed to optimize the switching pulse significantly the of that exit from the decelerator. Furthermore, inspired by the $s=3$ mode of a Stark decelerator, alternative for solenoid arrangements were investigated numerically [@Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]. Dulitz al.* developed a model the overall 6D phase-space acceptance a decelerator, from optimal sets be derived to the decelerator at minimum loss [@Dulitz:PRA91:013409]. Dulitz *et al.* also proposed and implemented schemes to improve the focusing properties Zeeman decelerator applying current to selected solenoids despite the substantial improvements these methods phase-stable operation of a multi-stage Zeeman decelerator over large range velocities remains challenging. Recently, a very approach emerged that can be used to overcome intrinsic limitations of multi-stage decelerators. So-called traveling wave decelerators employ spatially moving electrostatic or magnetic confine part of the beam in one multiple that traveling the speed the molecular beam pulse and are subsequently gradually slowed down. In approach the molecules are confined in genuine potential wells, and in wells until the velocity is reached. Consequently, decelerators inherently phase stable, and occur to during deceleration The acceptances are almost in both the longitudinal and directions, which appears to that are designed to spatially trap the molecules the end of the decelerator. Both traveling Stark [@Osterwalder:PRA81:051401
irste:Sience338:1060; @Zastrow:NatChem6:216; @vogels:SCIEnCE350:787]. FoR muLti-StAge ZEemaN decelerators, sEVeraL advanced switching protOcols HaVE beeN PrOposeD and tesTEd TO MitIgAtE loSsES. WIederKehR *et al.* exTensively iNveStIgated phase sTAbIlity in a ZeEmaN decelerator, ParTiculaRlY inCLudinG thE role Of the nONzero rIse and falL tIMes of tHE currenT PUlSes, aS well as the influenCE oF The operation phAse angLe [@wIeDERkeHr:JcP135:214202; @WiederkeHr:pRA82:043428]. EvOLutionaRY aLGORitHMs were developEd to optimizE The SwitchInG puLSe sequEnce, sIgNIfiCantly increAsinG the numbeR of parTIcles thAT exit frOm the dEceLerAtor. fUrThErmOrE, InsPIrEd bY The $S=3$ mode of a stArK deceLeraTOR, ALterNatIve sTrateGies for solenoId aRranGEmeNts weRe invEstiGaTed nuMericaLly [@WiEdErkehr:PRA82:043428]. Dulitz *Et al.* Developed A moDeL foR tHe oveRAll 6D phAse-SpaCe accepTance of A zeeMaN DECeLerator, from which opTiMAL pArameter Sets caN Be DeRIved to opErAte The dECEleraTor aT MiNimum losS [@DulitZ:pRa91:013409]. DUlitz *et Al.* Also prOpOseD anD implEMentEd scheMes to impRove tHE transverse focUSing propertieS Of A zEeMAn deCelErator by appLyinG ReveRsed CUrRenT PulseS to seLeCTeD Solenoids [@Dulitz:JCP140:104201]. YEt, DespitE the sUbstantial impRovements tHESE methods Can oFFeR, The phase-stable OperaTion of a mulTI-stage ZeEman dEceleratOr over a laRGE range of VelOciTieS reMAInS challenging.

RECEntlY, a Very eleGanT approaCh eMerGed ThaT cAn be used tO overcomE tHeSe InTriNsic lIMitationS oF muLtI-stAge deCEleratOrs. So-CallEd TrAVelIng wave DEcELEratOrS eMploY spAtIally MoviNG elEctrostAtic or magNetIC traPs To Confine Part of the moleCuLar beam in oNe Or mUltiplE WElls that Start traveling at the speeD Of the moLecUlar bEam pUlse and arE suBsequeNtlY GraduaLly sloWed doWn. in tHIS apprOACh The MoLecules are CONfiNed in GeNuinE potentIal wells, and stay conFIneD in these wells UntIl thE FInAl vELoCIty Is REacHED. Consequently, thEse decelerAtORs Are inherenTLy pHaSe stablE, and no lOsses OCcur due To couplinGs of motioNs DuriNG The DeceleratiOn procesS. The accepTAnces ARe AlmosT eqUal in bOtH thE longItudinAL anD tranSverse DiRectioNs, whiCh Appears tO be particularly advantagEous foR expeRimEnts that aRe dESigNed to spatIallY trap the moLecUleS at thE enD Of the DeceLErAtoR. both tRaveLIng wave StARk [@ostERWaLder:PRA81:051401
irste:Sience338:1060; @Zas trow:NatCh em6:2 16;  @V og els: SCIE NCE350:787]. F o r mu lti-stage Zeeman decel erato rs ,  sev e ra l adv anced s w it c h ing  p ro toc ol s  h ave b een  propos ed and tes ted  t o mitigate l o ss es. Wieder keh r *et al.* e xte nsivel yinv e stiga ted  phas e stab i lity i n a Zeema nd eceler a tor, pa r t ic ular ly including ther ol e  of the nonzer o rise  a n df a lltim es of thecu rrent pulses, as w e lla s the influen ce of the o p era tion p ha sea ngle [ @Wied er k ehr :JCP135:214 202;  @Wiederk ehr:PR A 82:0434 2 8]. Evo lution ary  al gori t hm swer ed eve l op edt o o ptimizeth eswitc hing p u l se s equ ence , sig nificantly in cre asin g  th e num ber o f pa rt icles  thatexitfr om the decelera tor.  Furtherm ore ,ins pi red b y  the $ s=3 $ m ode ofa Stark dec el e r a to r, alternative str at e g ie s for so lenoid ar ra n gementswe reinve s t igate d nu m er ically [ @Wiede r ke hr :PRA82: 04 3428].  D uli tz*et a l .* d evelop ed a mod el fo r  the overall 6 D  phase-spacea cc e p ta n ce o f a  Zeeman dec eler a tor,  fro m  w hic h  opti mal p ar a me t er sets can be deri ve d to o perat e the deceler ator at mi n i m um loss[@Du l it z :PRA91:013409] . Dul itz *et al . * also p ropos ed and i mplemente d schemestoimp rov e t h e  t ransverse foc u s ingpr opertie s o f a Zee man  de cel era to r by appl ying rev er se dcu rre nt pu l ses to s el ect ed  so lenoi d s [@Du litz: JCP1 40 :1 0 420 1]. Yet ,  d e s pite  t he  sub sta nt ial i mpro v eme nts the se method s c a n of fe r,  the ph ase-stable op er ation of a  m ult i-stag e Zeeman d ecelerator over a large range o f v eloci ties  remainscha llengi ng. 
Recen tly, a  very  e leg a n t app r o ac h e me rged thatc a n b e use dto o vercome  these intrinsic l i mit ations of mul ti- stag e de cel e ra t ors .S o-c a l led traveling w ave decele ra t or s employ s p ati al ly movi ng elec trost a tic ormagnetictraps toco nfin e par t of the m olecular  beam ino ne or mu ltipl e w ells t ha t s tarttravel i ngat th e spee dof the  mole cu lar beam  pulse and are subseque ntly g radua lly  slowed d own .  In  this app roac h the mole cul esare c onf i ned i n ge n ui nep otent ialw ells, and st ayc o nf ined in the s e wel ls un til the fi nalvelocity is reach e d. Consequentl y, t h e sedec e lera to rs are inheren tly  p h a se stabl e,  and no los ses occu rd ue to  coupl ings o f motio n s  d u ring t he d ece lerationpro ce s s. Theac ce p tances  are  a lmostequali n bo t h  the longitudina l and t ransv e rse  dire ct ions, w h ichappears to  be particu larlyadva ntage ous for  e xperim ent sthat are d e signed to  spat ially t ra p th e m olecul es a t the e nd o fthe  decelera t o r. Bo th tra veli ng wa ve  Sta rk [@Oste r walder:P RA8 1 :051401 
irste:Sience338:1060; @Zastrow:NatChem6:216;_@Vogels:SCIENCE350:787]. For_multi-stage Zeeman decelerators, several_advanced switching_protocols_have been_proposed_and tested to_mitigate losses. Wiederkehr_*et al.* extensively investigated_phase stability in_a_Zeeman decelerator, particularly including the role of the nonzero rise and fall times of_the_current pulses,_as_well_as the influence of the_operation phase angle [@Wiederkehr:JCP135:214202; @Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]._Evolutionary algorithms_were developed to optimize the switching pulse sequence,_significantly_increasing the number_of particles that exit from the decelerator. Furthermore, inspired_by the $s=3$ mode of a_Stark decelerator, alternative_strategies_for_solenoid arrangements were investigated_numerically [@Wiederkehr:PRA82:043428]. Dulitz *et al.* developed_a model for the overall 6D_phase-space acceptance of a Zeeman decelerator, from_which optimal parameter sets can be_derived to operate the decelerator_at minimum_loss [@Dulitz:PRA91:013409]. Dulitz *et al.*_also proposed and_implemented schemes_to improve the_transverse focusing properties of a Zeeman_decelerator by applying_reversed current pulses to selected solenoids_[@Dulitz:JCP140:104201]._Yet, despite the_substantial_improvements_these methods_can offer, the_phase-stable_operation of_a_multi-stage Zeeman decelerator over a large_range_of velocities remains challenging.

Recently, a very elegant_approach emerged that can_be_used to overcome these_intrinsic limitations of multi-stage decelerators._So-called traveling wave decelerators employ spatially_moving electrostatic_or magnetic_traps to confine part of the molecular beam in one or_multiple wells that start traveling at_the speed of the_molecular beam_pulse_and are subsequently_gradually_slowed down._In this approach the molecules are confined_in genuine_potential wells, and stay confined in_these wells until the_final_velocity is reached. Consequently, these decelerators_are inherently phase stable, and no_losses occur due to couplings_of_motions_during the deceleration process. The_acceptances are almost equal in both_the longitudinal and_transverse directions, which appears to be particularly_advantageous_for experiments that are designed to_spatially_trap the molecules at the end_of_the_decelerator. Both traveling wave Stark_[@Osterwalder:PRA81:051401