{array} \right.$
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In each case, separating the factors involving $d$ (resp. $g$) from those involving $e$ (resp. $h$) gives an instance of condition (2) in the definition of partial cocycle, which is thus seen to ensure invariance under the illustrated instance of the 4-4 extended Pachner move and the 2-6 extended Pachner move. Invariance under moves of these forms with a vertex (resp. an edge) of the polygon in the Seifert surface being modified by the move lying in the knot is, by an identical argument, given by the instances of condition (2) with $i=1$ and $j =2$ (resp. $i = j = 1$). In the case illustrated of the 2-6 extended Pachner move, the new vertex is added to the ordering after the vertices of the triangle lying in the Seifert surface. However, if it is inserted anywhere else in the ordering, an undefying calculation shows that an equation of the same form ensures invariance under the 2-6 move.

The case of 1-4 and 2-3 Pachner moves is similar. Invariance under each is ensured by condition (1). We illustrate this with the instances of the moves in which the boundary contains an edge of the knot bounding a triangle of the Seifert surface. The before and after states of the 2-3 move are shown in Figure \[2-3\_with\_knot\_and\_surface\]

[ll]{}

$\displaystyle
\begin{tikzpicture}%[thick][scale=1.5]
    \fill[blue,blue, opacity=.5] (1.5,1.8)--(0,0)--(1.9,-0.5);
        \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (A) at (1.5,1.8){};
    \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (B) at (0,0){};
    \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (C) at (1.9,-0.5){};
    \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (D) at (3,0
{ array } \right.$ 
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 In each case, separating the factors involving $ d$ (resp. $ g$) from those imply $ e$ (resp. $ h$) render an instance of condition (2) in the definition of partial cocycle, which is therefore seen to ensure invariance under the illustrated case of the 4 - 4 extended Pachner move and the 2 - 6 extend Pachner move. Invariance under motion of these forms with a vertex (resp. an edge) of the polygon in the Seifert surface being change by the move lying in the knot is, by an identical argument, given by the case of condition (2) with $ i=1 $ and $ j = 2 $ (resp. $ i = j = 1 $). In the character illustrated of the 2 - 6 extended Pachner move, the new vertex is add to the ordering after the vertices of the triangle lying in the Seifert surface. However, if it is tuck anywhere else in the ordering, an undefying calculation shows that an equation of the same form ensures invariance under the 2 - 6 move. 

 The case of 1 - 4 and 2 - 3 Pachner moves is similar. Invariance under each is ensured by condition (1). We illustrate this with the instances of the moves in which the limit incorporate an edge of the slub restrict a triangle of the Seifert surface. The before and after country of the 2 - 3 move are shown in Figure \[2 - 3\_with\_knot\_and\_surface\ ] 

 [ ll ] { } 

 $ \displaystyle 
 \begin{tikzpicture}%[thick][scale=1.5 ] 
     \fill[blue, blue, opacity=.5 ] (1.5,1.8)--(0,0)--(1.9,-0.5); 
         \node[circle, fill, inside sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt ] (A) at (1.5,1.8) { }; 
     \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt ] (B) at (0,0) { }; 
     \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt ] (C) at (1.9,-0.5) { }; 
     \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, knocked out sep=0pt ] (vitamin d) at (3,0
{arrwy} \right.$
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In each case, reparating the yqctors involbing $d$ (rdsp. $g$) from those involving $e$ (rwsp. $h$) gives an instance of zondition (2) in the defmnition of partiem cocycle, whidm is chns seen to ensute invarianca under the ilnurtxated instance of the 4-4 extended Pachger movr wnd the 2-6 extenqed Kacrner move. Invariance under moves of thsse forks with a veryex (resp. an edge) of the popygoj in the Seifert skrface beint moqufied by the move lying in the knoj is, by an identical argument, gixen bv the instabcws lx condition (2) witr $i=1$ and $j =2$ (rcxp. $i = b = 1$). In yhe case illusbratev of the 2-6 extended Pachnec move, the new vertev is addeg co the ordering after tye vetticev of rhe trjaigls lyinh ii the Seifedt surface. Yowever, if it is inxewnrd anywhere slse ig ehe ordering, an undefying calculation svowa that an equation of tye same form ensures lnvariancq under the 2-6 move.

The case of 1-4 and 2-3 Pachner moves hs sijklax. Invafuajce under each is ensured by condition (1). We iljhsurane this with the lnstances of the mpvfs yn which the coundaxg dontains an edge ov the kgot biunding a trisngle of the Seifert surfacw. The before qnd after states oy the 2-3 move cre shpwn im Figure \[2-3\_with\_knot\_and\_suryace\]

[ll]{}

$\sisplaystylf
\begin{tikaoicture}%[thick][scald=1.5]
    \xill[blue,blue, opacity=.5] (1.5,1.8)--(0,0)--(1.9,-0.5);
        \node[ciccle, yill, inndr sgp=.9pt, oueer sep=0pt] (W) at (1.5,1.8){};
    \node[circle, fill, innet sep=.9pd, outer seo=0pt] (B) at (0,0){};
    \node[circle, fill, inixr sep=.9pt, outet sap=0pn] (C) at (1.9,-0.5){};
    \nodc[circle, fill, inger sep=.9pt, outet sep=0pt] (D) at (3,0
{array} \right.$ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In each case, factors $d$ (resp. from those involving instance condition (2) in definition of partial which is thus seen to ensure under the illustrated instance of the 4-4 extended Pachner move and the 2-6 Pachner move. Invariance under moves of these forms with a vertex (resp. an of polygon the surface being modified by the move lying in the knot is, by an identical argument, given the instances of condition (2) with $i=1$ and =2$ (resp. $i = = 1$). In the case of 2-6 extended move, new is added to ordering after the vertices of the triangle lying in the Seifert surface. However, if it is inserted else in an undefying shows an of the same invariance under the 2-6 move. The and 2-3 Pachner moves is similar. Invariance under is ensured condition (1). We illustrate this with instances of the moves in which the boundary an edge of the knot bounding a triangle of the Seifert surface. The before and of the 2-3 move shown in Figure [ll]{} \begin{tikzpicture}%[thick][scale=1.5] opacity=.5] \node[circle, fill, sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (A) at (1.5,1.8){}; \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer (B) at (0,0){}; \node[circle, fill, inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (C) \node[circle, inner sep=.9pt, outer (D) at (3,0
{array} \right.$
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In each case, separAting the faCtors InvOlvInG $d$ (reSp. $g$) fRom those involvINg $e$ (rEsp. $h$) gives an instance of cOnditIoN (2) In thE DeFinitIon of paRTiAL CocYcLe, WhiCh IS tHus seEn tO ensure Invariance UndEr The illustratED iNstance of tHe 4-4 eXtended PachnEr mOve and ThE 2-6 exTEnded pacHner mOve. InvARiance Under moveS oF These fORms with A VErTex (rEsp. an edge) of the polYGoN In the Seifert suRface bEiNG mODIfiEd bY the move lyInG in thE Knot is, bY An IDENtiCAl argument, givEn by the instANceS of conDiTioN (2) With $i=1$ aNd $j =2$ (reSp. $I = J = 1$). In The case illuStraTed of the 2-6 eXtendeD pachner MOve, the nEw vertEx iS adDed tO ThE oRdeRiNG afTEr The VErtIces of thE tRiAngle LyinG IN THe SeIfeRt suRface. however, if it is InsErteD AnyWhere Else iN the OrDerinG, an undEfyinG cAlculation shows That An equatioN of ThE saMe Form eNSures iNvaRiaNce undeR the 2-6 movE.

the CaSE OF 1-4 aNd 2-3 Pachner moves is siMiLAR. INvariancE under EAcH iS Ensured bY cOndItioN (1). wE illuStraTE tHis with tHe instANcEs Of the moVeS in whiCh The BouNdary COntaIns an eDge of the Knot bOUnding a trianglE Of the Seifert sURfACE. THE befOre And after staTes oF The 2-3 mOve aRE sHowN In FigUre \[2-3\_wiTh\_KNoT\_And\_surface\]

[ll]{}

$\displayStYle
\begIn{tikZpicture}%[thick][Scale=1.5]
    \fill[bLUE,Blue, opacIty=.5] (1.5,1.8)--(0,0)--(1.9,-0.5);
        \nODe[CIrcle, fill, inner Sep=.9pt, Outer sep=0pt] (a) At (1.5,1.8){};
    \node[ciRcle, fIll, inner Sep=.9pt, outeR SEp=0pt] (B) at (0,0){};
    \nOde[CirCle, FilL, INnEr sep=.9pt, outer sEP=0Pt] (C) aT (1.9,-0.5){};
    \nOde[circLe, fIll, inneR seP=.9pt, OutEr sEp=0Pt] (D) at (3,0
{array} \right.$
  ------- ---------- ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- -------------- - ---- ---------------------- ----- -- - ---- - -- ----- ------- - -- - - ---- -- --- -- - -- ----- --- ------- ---------- --- -- ------------ - -- ---------- --- ------------ --- ------ -- --- - ----- --- ----- 

In e a ch cas e, separa ti n g thef actorsi n vo lvin g $d$ (resp. $g$) fr o m those involv ing $e $( re s p . $ h$)  gives anin stanc e  of con d it i o n  (2 )  in the defin ition of pa r tia l cocy cl e,w hich i s thu ss een  to ensureinva riance un der th e  illust r ated in stance  of  th e 4- 4  e xt end ed Pac h ne r m o veand the2- 6exten dedP a c h nermov e. I nvari ance under mo ves  oft hes e for ms wi th a  v ertex  (resp . aned ge) of the poly gonin the Se ife rt  su rf ace b e ing mo dif ied  by the  move l y ing  i n t he  knot is, by an id en t i ca l argume nt, gi v en  b y  the ins ta nce s of c ondit ion( 2)  with $i =1$ an d  $ j=2$ (re sp . $i =  j  =1$) . Int he c ase il lustrate d oft he 2-6 extende d  Pachner move ,  t h e  n e w ve rte x is addedto t h e or deri n gaft e r the  vert ic e so f the triangle lyin gin the  Seif ert surface.However, i f i t is ins erte d  a n ywhere else in  theordering,a n undefy ing c alculati on showst h at an eq uat ion  of  th e sa me form ensur e s  inv ar iance u nde r the 2 -6mov e.
Th ecase of 1 -4 and 2 -3  P ac hn ermoves is simil ar . I nv ari anceu nder e ach i s en su re d  by  condit i on ( 1).We  i llus tra te  this  wit h  th e insta nces of t hem oves  i nwhich t he boundary c on tains an e dg e o f thek n ot bound ing a triangle of the S e ifert s urf ace.Thebefore an d a fter s tat e s of t he 2-3  move  a res h own i n Fi gur e\[2-3\_wit h \ _kn ot\_a nd \_su rface\] 

[ll]{}

$\displa y sty le
\begin{tik zpi ctur e } %[ thi c k] [ sca le = 1.5 ]     \fill[blue, blue, opac it y =. 5] (1.5,1. 8 )-- (0 ,0)--(1 .9,-0.5 );
      \n ode[circl e, fill,in ners e p=. 9pt, outer  sep=0pt ] (A) at( 1.5,1 . 8) {};
  \node[ ci rcl e, fi ll, in n ersep=. 9pt, o ut er sep =0pt]  ( B) at (0 ,0){};
    \node[circle , fill , inn ersep=.9pt,  ou t ersep=0pt](C)at (1.9,-0 .5) {}; 
   \no d e[cir cle, fi ll, inner  sep = .9pt, out e rsep = 0 pt ] (D) at (3 , 0 
{array} \right.$
_ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In each case, separating_the factors_involving_$d$ (resp._$g$)_from those involving_$e$ (resp. $h$)_gives an instance of_condition (2) in_the_definition of partial cocycle, which is thus seen to ensure invariance under the illustrated_instance_of the_4-4_extended_Pachner move and the 2-6_extended Pachner move. Invariance under_moves of_these forms with a vertex (resp. an edge)_of_the polygon in_the Seifert surface being modified by the move lying_in the knot is, by an_identical argument, given_by_the_instances of condition (2)_with $i=1$ and $j =2$ (resp._$i = j = 1$). In_the case illustrated of the 2-6 extended_Pachner move, the new vertex is_added to the ordering after_the vertices_of the triangle lying in_the Seifert surface._However, if_it is inserted_anywhere else in the ordering, an_undefying calculation shows_that an equation of the same_form_ensures invariance under_the_2-6_move.

The case_of 1-4 and_2-3_Pachner moves_is_similar. Invariance under each is ensured_by_condition (1). We illustrate this with the_instances of the moves_in_which the boundary contains_an edge of the knot_bounding a triangle of the Seifert_surface. The_before and_after states of the 2-3 move are shown in Figure \[2-3\_with\_knot\_and\_surface\]

[ll]{}

$\displaystyle
\begin{tikzpicture}%[thick][scale=1.5]
_   \fill[blue,blue, opacity=.5] (1.5,1.8)--(0,0)--(1.9,-0.5);
_   _ __\node[circle, fill, inner_sep=.9pt,_outer sep=0pt]_(A) at (1.5,1.8){};
    \node[circle,_fill, inner_sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (B) at (0,0){};
_   \node[circle,_fill,_inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (C) at_(1.9,-0.5){};
    \node[circle, fill,_inner sep=.9pt, outer sep=0pt] (D)_at_(3,0