 due to the conditions on $\varphi$ while the second also vanishes because $\varphi\in\mathcal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\infty,\infty)$. Hence $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{k}\varphi\longrightarrow0=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\varphi(x_{1})\sin ksdx_{1}$$ for all $\varphi$, and leading to the conclusion that $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sin kx=0\label{Eqn: testsin}$$ test-functionally.$\qquad\blacksquare$

This example illustrates the fact that if $\textrm{Supp}(\varphi)=[\alpha,\beta]\subseteq J$[^7], integrating by parts sufficiently large number of times so as to wipe out the pathological behaviour of $(f_{k})$ gives $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{J}f_{k}\varphi= & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi\\
= & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-1)}\varphi^{\prime}=\cdots=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{m}\end{aligned}$$

where $f_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pi_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{c}^{x_{1}}dx_{2}\cdots\int_{c}^{x_{m-1}}dx_{m}f_{k}(x_{m})$ is an $m$-times arbitrary indefinite integral of $f_{k}$. If now it is true that $\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\rightarrow\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}$, then it must also be true that $f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ converges in the mean to $f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ so that $$\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}\longrightarrow(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f\varphi.$$ In fact the converse also holds leading to the following Equivalences between $m$-convergence in the mean and convergence with respect to test-functions, [@Korevaar1968].

**Type 1 Equivalence
due to the conditions on $ \varphi$ while the second also vanishes because $ \varphi\in\mathcal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\infty,\infty)$. Hence $ $ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{k}\varphi\longrightarrow0=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\varphi(x_{1})\sin ksdx_{1}$$ for all $ \varphi$, and lead to the ending that $ $ \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sin kx=0\label{Eqn: testsin}$$ test - functionally.$\qquad\blacksquare$ 

 This example illustrates the fact that if $ \textrm{Supp}(\varphi)=[\alpha,\beta]\subseteq J$[^7 ], desegregate by parts sufficiently large issue of meter so as to wipe out the pathological behaviour of $ (f_{k})$ gives $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \int_{J}f_{k}\varphi= & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi\\ 
 = & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-1)}\varphi^{\prime}=\cdots=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{m}\end{aligned}$$ 

 where $ f_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pi_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{c}^{x_{1}}dx_{2}\cdots\int_{c}^{x_{m-1}}dx_{m}f_{k}(x_{m})$ is an $ m$-times arbitrary indefinite integral of $ f_{k}$. If immediately it is true that $ \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\rightarrow\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}$, then it must also be dependable that $ f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ converges in the mean to $ f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ so that $ $ \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}\longrightarrow(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f\varphi.$$ In fact the converse besides holds leading to the follow Equivalences between $ m$-convergence in the mean and convergence with esteem to test - functions, [ @Korevaar1968 ]. 

 * * Type 1 comparison
 duf to the conditions on $\vxrphi$ while the second also banishes because $\varphi\in\mathcal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\infvy,\indty)$. Htuce $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{k}\vxrphi\longgightarroq0=\int_{\elpha}^{\beta}\lim_{k\rigifarrow\ikyty}\vadihi(x_{1})\snn ksdx_{1}$$ for all $\yarphi$, and neading to the cunelusion that $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sin hx=0\label{Rqj: testsin}$$ test-suncuiogallg.$\qquad\blacksquare$

This example illuatrates the fact thay if $\textrm{Supp}(\varphi)=[\alpha,\heta]\dubseteq J$[^7], integrahing by parja stdficiently lxrge numbeg of times ao as to wipe out the pathologizal bzhaviour of $(f_{j})$ glees $$\begin{almgned}
\igt_{J}f_{k}\varphi= & \int_{\alphd}^{\beta}f_{k}\farphi\\
= & \int_{\alpma}^{\bete}f_{k}^{(-1)}\vqrphi^{\prime}=\cdots=(-1)^{m}\int_{\al'ha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{m}\end{wligned}$$

wharz $f_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pi_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{c}^{z_{1}}dz_{2}\cdotv\int_{w}^{x_{m-1}}db_{n}f_{k}(b_{m})$ js ah $m$-timfs erbitrary ihdefinite ibtegral of $f_{k}$. If noe yn is true thaf $\int_{\ajpra}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\rightarrow\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}$, then pt mhst also be true that $f_{j}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ converges ij the meag to $f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ so that $$\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\int_{\al[ha}^{\beva}w_{k}^{(-m)}\rqrphi^{(o)}\oojgrightarrow(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}=\int_{\alpha}^{\betw}r\vsrihi.$$ In fact the cjnverse alsp jokqs leading to the follkwing Equivalences betweeg $m$-cobvergence in yhe mean and convergence wirh respect tj test-functions, [@Korzvaar1968].

**Type 1 Eduivslencr
due to the conditions on $\varphi$ while also because $\varphi\in\mathcal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\infty,\infty)$. $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{k}\varphi\longrightarrow0=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\varphi(x_{1})\sin ksdx_{1}$$ for the that $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sin kx=0\label{Eqn: test-functionally.$\qquad\blacksquare$ This example the fact that if $\textrm{Supp}(\varphi)=[\alpha,\beta]\subseteq J$[^7], by parts sufficiently large number of times so as to wipe out the behaviour of $(f_{k})$ gives $$\begin{aligned} \int_{J}f_{k}\varphi= & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi\\ = & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-1)}\varphi^{\prime}=\cdots=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{m}\end{aligned}$$ where $f_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pi_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{c}^{x_{1}}dx_{2}\cdots\int_{c}^{x_{m-1}}dx_{m}f_{k}(x_{m})$ an arbitrary integral $f_{k}$. If now it is true that $\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\rightarrow\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}$, then it must also be true that $f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ in the mean to $f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ so that $$\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}\longrightarrow(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f\varphi.$$ fact the converse also leading to the following Equivalences $m$-convergence the mean convergence respect test-functions, [@Korevaar1968]. **Type Equivalence
 due to the conditions on $\varphI$ while the sEcond AlsO vaNiShes BecaUse $\varphi\in\matHCal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\Infty,\infty)$. Hence $$\int_{-\inftY}^{\inftY}f_{K}\VarpHI\lOngriGhtarroW0=\InT_{\ALphA}^{\bEtA}\liM_{k\RIgHtarrOw\iNfty}\varPhi(x_{1})\sin ksdX_{1}$$ foR aLl $\varphi$, and lEAdIng to the coNclUsion that $$\lim_{K\riGhtarrOw\InfTY}\sin kX=0\laBel{EqN: testsIN}$$ test-fUnctionalLy.$\QQuad\blACksquarE$

tHiS exaMple illustrates thE FaCT that if $\textrm{SUpp}(\varPhI)=[\AlPHA,\beTa]\sUbseteq J$[^7], inTeGratiNG by partS SuFFICieNTly large numbeR of times so aS To wIpe out ThE paTHologiCal beHaVIouR of $(f_{k})$ gives $$\bEgin{Aligned}
\inT_{J}f_{k}\vaRPhi= & \int_{\aLPha}^{\beta}F_{k}\varpHi\\
= & \iNt_{\aLpha}^{\BEtA}f_{K}^{(-1)}\vaRpHI^{\prIMe}=\CdoTS=(-1)^{m}\iNt_{\alpha}^{\bEtA}f_{K}^{(-m)}\varPhi^{m}\END{ALignEd}$$

wHere $F_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pI_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{C}^{x_{1}}dX_{2}\cdoTS\inT_{c}^{x_{m-1}}dX_{m}f_{k}(x_{M})$ is aN $m$-Times ArbitrAry inDeFinite integral oF $f_{k}$. IF now it is tRue ThAt $\iNt_{\Alpha}^{\BEta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\RigHtaRrow\int_{\Alpha}^{\beTA}f^{(-m)}$, ThEN IT mUst also be true that $f_{K}^{(-m)}\VARpHi^{(m)}$ conveRges in THe MeAN to $f^{(-m)}\varPhI^{(m)}$ sO thaT $$\INt_{\alpHa}^{\beTA}f_{K}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\Int_{\alpHA}^{\bEtA}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varPhI^{(m)}\longRiGhtArrOw(-1)^{m}\inT_{\AlphA}^{\beta}f^{(-M)}\varphi^{(m)}=\Int_{\alPHa}^{\beta}f\varphi.$$ IN Fact the converSE aLSO hOLds lEadIng to the folLowiNG EquIvalENcEs bETween $M$-convErGEnCE in the mean and converGeNce witH respEct to test-funcTions, [@KorevAAR1968].

**type 1 EquiValeNCe
 due to the conditions on$\varphi$while  th e s ec ondalso  vanishes beca u se $ \varphi\in\mathcal{C}_ {0}^{ 1} ( -\in f ty ,\inf ty)$. H e nc e $$\ in t_ {-\ in f ty }^{\i nft y}f_{k} \varphi\lo ngr ig htarrow0=\in t _{ \alpha}^{\ bet a}\lim_{k\ri ght arrow\ in fty } \varp hi( x_{1} )\sink sdx_{1 }$$ for a ll $\varp h i$, and l ea ding  to the conclusio n  t h at $$\lim_{k\r ightar ro w \i n f ty} \si n kx=0\lab el {Eqn: testsin } $$ t e st- f unctionally.$ \qquad\blac k squ are$
Th ise xample  illu st r ate s the factthat  if $\tex trm{Su p p}(\var p hi)=[\a lpha,\ bet a]\ subs e te qJ$[ ^7 ] , i n te gra t ing  by part ssu ffici entl y l a rgenum berof ti mes so as towip e ou t  th e pat holog ical  b ehavi our of  $(f_ {k })$ gives $$\be gin{ aligned}\in t_ {J} f_ {k}\v a rphi=& \ int _{\alph a}^{\be t a}f _{ k } \ va rphi\\
= & \int_{\ al p h a} ^{\beta} f_{k}^ { (- 1) } \varphi^ {\ pri me}= \ c dots= (-1) ^ {m }\int_{\ alpha} ^ {\ be ta}f_{k }^ {(-m)} \v arp hi^ {m}\e n d{al igned} $$

wher e $f_ { k}^{(-m)}(x)=\ p i_{k}(x)+\int _ {c } ^ {x } dx_{ 1}\ int_{c}^{x_ {1}} d x_{2 }\cd o ts \in t _{c}^ {x_{m -1 } }d x _{m}f_{k}(x_{m})$ i san $m$ -time s arbitrary i ndefinitei n t egral of  $f_ { k} $ . If now it is  true  that $\in t _{\alpha }^{\b eta}f_{k }^{(-m)}\ r i ghtarrow \in t_{ \al pha } ^ {\ beta}f^{(-m)} $ ,  the nit must  al so be t rue  th at$f_ {k }^{(-m)}\ varphi^{ (m )} $co nve rgesi n the me an  to  $ f^{ (-m)} \ varphi ^{(m) }$ s oth a t $ $\int_{ \ al p h a}^{ \b et a}f_ {k} \v arphi =(-1 ) ^{m }\int_{ \alpha}^{ \be t a}f_ {k }^ {(-m)}\ varphi^{(m)}\ lo ngrightarr ow (-1 )^{m}\ i n t_{\alph a}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varp h i^{(m)} =\i nt_{\ alph a}^{\beta }f\ varphi .$$ In fac t theconve rs e a l s o hol d s  l ead in g to the f o l low ing E qu ival ences b etween $m$-converg e nce  in the meanand  con v e rg enc e  w i thre s pec t to test-functio ns, [@Kore va a r1 968].

**T y pe1Equival ence
 due_to the_conditions on $\varphi$ while_the second_also_vanishes because_$\varphi\in\mathcal{C}_{0}^{1}(-\infty,\infty)$._Hence $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{k}\varphi\longrightarrow0=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\varphi(x_{1})\sin ksdx_{1}$$_for all $\varphi$,_and leading to the_conclusion that $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sin_kx=0\label{Eqn:_testsin}$$ test-functionally.$\qquad\blacksquare$

This example illustrates the fact that if $\textrm{Supp}(\varphi)=[\alpha,\beta]\subseteq J$[^7], integrating by parts sufficiently_large_number of_times_so_as to wipe out the_pathological behaviour of $(f_{k})$ gives_$$\begin{aligned}
\int_{J}f_{k}\varphi= &_\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi\\
= & \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-1)}\varphi^{\prime}=\cdots=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{m}\end{aligned}$$

where $f_{k}^{(-m)}(x)=\pi_{k}(x)+\int_{c}^{x}dx_{1}\int_{c}^{x_{1}}dx_{2}\cdots\int_{c}^{x_{m-1}}dx_{m}f_{k}(x_{m})$ is an $m$-times arbitrary_indefinite_integral of $f_{k}$._If now it is true that $\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\rightarrow\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}$, then it_must also be true that $f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$_converges in the_mean_to_$f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}$ so that $$\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}\varphi=(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f_{k}^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}\longrightarrow(-1)^{m}\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f^{(-m)}\varphi^{(m)}=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f\varphi.$$_In fact the converse also holds_leading to the following Equivalences between_$m$-convergence in the mean and convergence with_respect to test-functions, [@Korevaar1968].

**Type 1 Equivalence