, showing the optimality of the FCC lattice (resp. BCC lattice) against the cubic lattice. The same occurs if $L$ is the BCC lattice and $\Lambda$ is the FCC lattice as we can see in Figure \[fig-BCCFCC\]. These numerics are consistent with [@Beterminlocal3d Conjecture 1.7] which states that optimality of $\mathsf{D}_3$ holds in dimension $3$ for any exponents $x_2>x_1>3$.

![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^2}$ on $[2,50]$, for the triangular lattice $\Lambda=\Lambda_1$. The triangular lattice seems to have lower Lennard-Jones type energy than the square lattice for any values of the parameters.[]{data-label="H2to10square"}](figHZ2.png){width="8cm"}

![Plot in the $(x_1,x_2)$-plane of the quantity $\frac{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\Lambda_1]}{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\mathbb Z^2]}$, for $3\le x_1<x_2\le 50$ and $x_1,x_2\in\mathbb Z$. Note that the smallest value is taken at $x_1=3, x_2=4$ and equals $\approx 1.061$, i.e. is already larger than $1$, and then the value increases in both coordinate directions, so that for $x_1=49$, $x_2=50$ it equals $\approx 1.499$, very close to the asymptotic value $3/2$.[]{data-label="fig:ratio"}](tri-sq-50x50.pdf "fig:"){width="9cm"}\

![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $[4,50]$ where $\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3$ is the FCC lattice (on the left) and $\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3^*$ the BCC lattice (on the right). The FCC and BCC lattices seem to have lower Lennard-Jones type energy than the cubic lattice for any values of the parameters.[]{data-label="Z3vsFCCBCC"}](HFCCZ3.png "fig:"){width="6cm"}![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $[4,
, showing the optimality of the FCC lattice (resp. BCC lattice) against the cubic lattice. The same occurs if $ L$ is the BCC wicket and $ \Lambda$ is the FCC wicket as we can visit in Figure \[fig - BCCFCC\ ]. These numerics are consistent with [ @Beterminlocal3d speculation 1.7 ] which submit that optimality of $ \mathsf{D}_3 $ holds in dimension $ 3 $ for any advocate $ x_2 > x_1>3$. 

! [ Plot of function $ H_{{\mathbb Z}^2}$ on $ [ 2,50]$, for the triangular lattice $ \Lambda=\Lambda_1$. The triangular wicket seem to have low Lennard - Jones type energy than the square lattice for any values of the parameters.[]{data - label="H2to10square"}](figHZ2.png){width="8 cm " } 

! [ Plot in the $ (x_1,x_2)$-plane of the quantity $ \frac{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\Lambda_1]}{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\mathbb Z^2]}$, for $ 3\le x_1 < x_2\le 50 $ and $ x_1,x_2\in\mathbb Z$. notice that the smallest value is taken at $ x_1=3, x_2=4 $ and equals $ \approx 1.061 $, i.e. is already large than $ 1 $, and then the value increases in both coordinate directions, so that for $ x_1=49 $, $ x_2=50 $ it equal $ \approx 1.499 $, very close to the asymptotic value $ 3/2$.[]{data - label="fig: ratio"}](tri - sq-50x50.pdf " fig:"){width="9cm"}\ 

! [ Plot of affair $ H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $ [ 4,50]$ where $ \Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3 $ is the FCC lattice (on the left) and $ \Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3^*$ the BCC lattice (on the right). The FCC and BCC lattices look to have lower Lennard - Jones type energy than the cubic lattice for any values of the parameters.[]{data - label="Z3vsFCCBCC"}](HFCCZ3.png " fig:"){width="6cm"}![Plot of function $ H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $ [ 4,
, shlwing the optimality of uhe FCC lattice (rgsp. BCC nattics) againsg the cubic lattice. The same oxcurs if $L$ is the BCC lattize and $\Lalbda$ is rhe HCC lattice as wx can sec in Rlgure \[hig-BCCFCC\]. These numerics dre consistent wktk [@Beterminlocal3d Conjecture 1.7] which seates tnah optimality os $\mauhss{D}_3$ hklds in dimension $3$ for any exponenfs $x_2>x_1>3$.

![Plmt of functiom $H_{{\mathbb Z}^2}$ on $[2,50]$, for the trlangklar lattice $\Lambdw=\Lambda_1$. The triwbgular lattize seems to have lower Lennard-Jones type energy than ghe sauare lattucw flt any values of tre parameters.[]{data-labal="H2to10sqiare"}](figHZ2.png){wicth="8rm"}

![Plit in the $(x_1,x_2)$-plane of vhe quantity $\frac{\min_{\jambda>0}E_f[\ldmyda\Lambda_1]}{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lqmvda\majhbb S^2]}$, fof $3\le x_1<x_2\me 50$ znd $x_1,x_2\ln\methbb Z$. Nots that the wmallest value is tskqb at $x_1=3, x_2=4$ and squals $\a[prox 1.061$, i.e. is already larger than $1$, and tven the value increases in both coordinate direftions, so that for $x_1=49$, $x_2=50$ it equals $\approx 1.499$, very close to the asym'tutie valud $3/2$.[]{dwta-label="fig:ratio"}](tri-sq-50x50.pdf "fig:"){width="9cm"}\

![Plot of fthcuiok $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $[4,50]$ chere $\Lambda=\mathxf{F}_3$ of the FCC latjice (on ths left) and $\Lambda=\mwthsf{D}_3^*$ jhe BCX lattice (on yhe right). The FCC and BCC lqttices seem ro have lower Lenncrd-Jones typz enerby thsn the cubic lattice fox any balues of tje paramefdrs.[]{data-label="Z3vsFZCBBC"}](HFWCZ3.png "fig:"){width="6cm"}![Plot of ftnction $H_{{\nathyb Z}^3}$ on $[4,
, showing the optimality of the FCC BCC against the lattice. The same BCC and $\Lambda$ is FCC lattice as can see in Figure \[fig-BCCFCC\]. These are consistent with [@Beterminlocal3d Conjecture 1.7] which states that optimality of $\mathsf{D}_3$ holds dimension $3$ for any exponents $x_2>x_1>3$. ![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^2}$ on $[2,50]$, the lattice The lattice seems to have lower Lennard-Jones type energy than the square lattice for any values of parameters.[]{data-label="H2to10square"}](figHZ2.png){width="8cm"} ![Plot in the $(x_1,x_2)$-plane of the quantity Z^2]}$, for $3\le x_1<x_2\le and $x_1,x_2\in\mathbb Z$. Note that smallest is taken $x_1=3, and $\approx 1.061$, i.e. already larger than $1$, and then the value increases in both coordinate directions, so that for $x_1=49$, it equals very close the value "fig:"){width="9cm"}\ ![Plot of Z}^3}$ on $[4,50]$ where $\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3$ is (on the left) and $\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3^*$ the BCC lattice the right). FCC and BCC lattices seem to lower Lennard-Jones type energy than the cubic lattice any values of the parameters.[]{data-label="Z3vsFCCBCC"}](HFCCZ3.png "fig:"){width="6cm"}![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $[4,
, showing the optimality of the fCC lattice (Resp. BcC lAttIcE) agaInst The cubic latticE. the sAme occurs if $L$ is the BCC laTtice AnD $\lambDA$ iS the FcC lattiCE aS WE caN sEe In FIgURe \[Fig-BCcFCc\]. These nUmerics are ConSiStent with [@BetERmInlocal3d CoNjeCture 1.7] which stAteS that oPtImaLIty of $\MatHsf{D}_3$ hOlds in DImensiOn $3$ for any eXpONents $x_2>X_1>3$.

![plot of fUNCtIon $H_{{\Mathbb Z}^2}$ on $[2,50]$, for the trIAnGUlar lattice $\LamBda=\LamBdA_1$. thE TRiaNguLar lattice SeEms to HAve loweR leNNARd-JONes type energy Than the squaRE laTtice fOr Any VAlues oF the pArAMetErs.[]{data-labeL="H2to10Square"}](fighZ2.png){wIDth="8cm"}

![PlOT in the $(x_1,X_2)$-plane Of tHe qUantITy $\FrAc{\mIn_{\LAmbDA>0}E_F[\laMBda\lambda_1]}{\miN_{\lAmBda>0}E_f[\LambDA\MAThbb z^2]}$, foR $3\le x_1<X_2\le 50$ anD $x_1,x_2\in\mathbb Z$. NOte That THe sMalleSt valUe is TaKen at $X_1=3, x_2=4$ and eQuals $\ApProx 1.061$, i.e. is already LargEr than $1$, and TheN tHe vAlUe incREases iN boTh cOordinaTe direcTIonS, sO THAt For $x_1=49$, $x_2=50$ it equals $\approX 1.499$, vERY cLose to thE asympTOtIc VAlue $3/2$.[]{data-LaBel="Fig:rATIo"}](tri-Sq-50x50.pDF "fIg:"){width="9cM"}\

![Plot oF FuNcTion $H_{{\maThBb Z}^3}$ on $[4,50]$ wHeRe $\LAmbDa=\matHSf{D}_3$ iS the FCc lattice (On the LEft) and $\Lambda=\maTHsf{D}_3^*$ the BCC latTIcE (ON tHE rigHt). THe FCC and BCC LattICes sEem tO HaVe lOWer LeNnard-joNEs TYpe energy than the cubIc LatticE for aNy values of the Parameters.[]{DATA-label="Z3vSFCCbcC"}](hfCCZ3.png "fig:"){widtH="6cm"}![PlOt of functiON $H_{{\mathbb z}^3}$ on $[4,
, showing the optimality o f the FCClatti ce(re sp . BC C la ttice) against thecubic lattice. The sam e occ ur s  if$ L$  is t he BCCl at t i cean d$\L am b da $ isthe  FCC la ttice as w e c an  see in Figu r e\[fig-BCCF CC\ ]. These num eri cs are  c ons i stent  wi th [@ Beterm i nlocal 3d Conjec tu r e 1.7] which s t a te s th at optimality of$ \m a thsf{D}_3$ hol ds indi m en s i on$3$  for any e xp onent s  $x_2>x _ 1> 3 $ . 

! [ Plot of funct ion $H_{{\m a thb b Z}^2 }$  on $[2,50 ]$, f or the  triangular  lat tice $\La mbda=\ L ambda_1 $ . The t riangu lar  la ttic e  s ee msto hav e  l owe r  Le nnard-Jo ne stypeener g y t hanthe  squ are l attice for an y v alue s  of  theparam eter s. []{da ta-lab el="H 2t o10square"}](fi gHZ2 .png){wid th= "8 cm" }
![Pl o t in t he$(x _1,x_2) $-plane ofth e q ua ntity $\frac{\min_ {\ l a mb da>0}E_f [\lamb d a\ La m bda_1]}{ \m in_ {\la m b da>0} E_f[ \ la mbda\mat hbb Z^ 2 ]} $,  for $3 \l e x_1< x_ 2\l e 5 0$ an d  $x_ 1,x_2\ in\mathb b Z$. Note that thes mallest value is t ak e n at  $x _1=3, x_2=4 $ an d  equ als$ \a ppr o x 1.0 61$,i. e .i s already larger th an  $1$,and t hen the value  increases i n  both co ordi n at e  directions, s o tha t for $x_1 = 49$, $x_ 2=50$  it equa ls $\appr o x  1.499$,  ve ryclo set o  t he asymptotic v alue  $ 3/2$.[] {da ta-labe l=" fig :ra tio "} ](tri-sq- 50x50.pd f"f ig :" ){w idth= " 9cm"}\
![ Plo toffunct i on $H_ {{\ma thbb  Z }^ 3 }$on $[4, 5 0] $ wher e$\ Lamb da= \m athsf {D}_ 3 $ i s the F CC lattic e ( o n th ele ft) and  $\Lambda=\ma th sf{D}_3^*$  t heBCC la t t ice (onthe right). The FCC and BCC lat tic es se em t o have lo wer  Lenna rd- J ones t ype en ergyth ant h e cub i c  l att ic e for anyv a lue s ofth e pa rameter s.[]{data-label="Z 3 vsF CCBCC"}](HFCC Z3. png" f ig :") { wi d th= "6 c m"} ! [ Plot of functio n $H_{{\ma th b bZ}^3}$ on$ [4, 
, showing_the optimality_of the FCC lattice_(resp. BCC_lattice)_against the_cubic_lattice. The same_occurs if $L$_is the BCC lattice_and $\Lambda$ is_the_FCC lattice as we can see in Figure \[fig-BCCFCC\]. These numerics are consistent with_[@Beterminlocal3d_Conjecture 1.7]_which_states_that optimality of $\mathsf{D}_3$ holds_in dimension $3$ for any_exponents $x_2>x_1>3$.

![Plot_of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^2}$ on $[2,50]$, for the_triangular_lattice $\Lambda=\Lambda_1$. The_triangular lattice seems to have lower Lennard-Jones type energy_than the square lattice for any_values of the_parameters.[]{data-label="H2to10square"}](figHZ2.png){width="8cm"}

![Plot_in_the $(x_1,x_2)$-plane of the_quantity $\frac{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\Lambda_1]}{\min_{\lambda>0}E_f[\lambda\mathbb Z^2]}$, for $3\le x_1<x_2\le_50$ and $x_1,x_2\in\mathbb Z$. Note that_the smallest value is taken at $x_1=3,_x_2=4$ and equals $\approx 1.061$, i.e._is already larger than $1$,_and then_the value increases in both_coordinate directions, so_that for_$x_1=49$, $x_2=50$ it_equals $\approx 1.499$, very close to_the asymptotic value_$3/2$.[]{data-label="fig:ratio"}](tri-sq-50x50.pdf "fig:"){width="9cm"}\

![Plot of function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$_on_$[4,50]$ where $\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3$_is_the_FCC lattice_(on the left)_and_$\Lambda=\mathsf{D}_3^*$ the_BCC_lattice (on the right). The FCC_and_BCC lattices seem to have lower Lennard-Jones_type energy than the_cubic_lattice for any values_of the parameters.[]{data-label="Z3vsFCCBCC"}](HFCCZ3.png "fig:"){width="6cm"}![Plot of_function $H_{{\mathbb Z}^3}$ on $[4,