 components, say $x, y$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identity on ${[a]} \cup L_a$, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identity on the complement of $T$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is a superinjective simplicial map, there exists $d' \in \lambda([d])$ such that $d'$ is disjoint from the complement of $T$, so $d'$ is in $T$. Since $d$ is the only nontrivial simple closed curve in $T$ which is not isotopic to $a$ by Scharlemann’s Theorem in [@Sc], we see that $d'$ is isotopic to $d$. So, $((g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda) ([d]) = [d]$. Hence, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identity on ${[a]} \cup L_a \cup D_a$.

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in

Claim 2: Let $v$ be any 1-sided simple closed curve on $N$. Then, $(g_v)_{\#} = (g_a)_{\#}$ on $\mathcal{C}(N)$.

Proof of Claim 2: Since $g=1$, $\widetilde{X}(N)$ is connected by Theorem 3.10 in [@AK]. So, we can find a sequence $a \rightarrow a_1 \rightarrow a_2 \rightarrow  \cdots \rightarrow  a_n=v$ of 1-sided simple closed curves connecting $a$ to $v$ such that each consecutive pair is connected by an edge in $\widetilde{X}(N)$. By Claim 1, $(g_a)_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a]\} \cup L_a \cup D_a$, and $(g_{a_1})_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a_1]\} \cup L_{a_1} \cup D_{a_1}$. So, we see that $(g_a)_{\#} ^{-1} (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ fixes every vertex in $([a] \cup L_a \
components, say $ x, y$. Since $ (g_a)_{\#}^{-1 } \circ \lambda$ is identity on $ { [ a ] } \cup L_a$, $ (g_a)_{\#}^{-1 } \circ \lambda$ is identity on the complement of $ T$. Since $ (g_a)_{\#}^{-1 } \circ \lambda$ is a superinjective simplicial map, there exists $ vitamin d' \in \lambda([d])$ such that $ d'$ is disjoint from the complement of $ T$, therefore $ d'$ is in $ T$. Since $ d$ is the only nontrivial simple closed bend in $ T$ which is not isotopic to $ a$ by Scharlemann ’s Theorem in [ @Sc ], we see that $ d'$ is isotopic to $ d$. So, $ (( g_a)_{\#}^{-1 } \circ \lambda) ([ d ]) = [ d]$. therefore, $ (g_a)_{\#}^{-1 } \circ \lambda$ is identity on $ { [ a ] } \cup L_a \cup D_a$. 

 = 2.2 in = 2.2 in 

 = 2.2 in = 2.2 in 

 = 2.2 in 

 Claim 2: Let $ v$ be any 1 - sided simple closed curvature on $ N$. Then, $ (g_v)_{\ # } = (g_a)_{\#}$ on $ \mathcal{C}(N)$. 

 Proof of Claim 2: Since $ g=1 $, $ \widetilde{X}(N)$ is connected by Theorem 3.10 in [ @AK ]. So, we can witness a sequence $ a \rightarrow a_1 \rightarrow a_2 \rightarrow   \cdots \rightarrow   a_n = v$ of 1 - sided simple closed curves connecting $ a$ to $ v$ such that each consecutive couple is connected by an edge in $ \widetilde{X}(N)$. By Claim 1, $ (g_a)_{\#}$ agrees with $ \lambda$ on $ \{[a]\ } \cup L_a \cup D_a$, and $ (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ agree with $ \lambda$ on $ \{[a_1]\ } \cup L_{a_1 } \cup D_{a_1}$. So, we see that $ (g_a)_{\ # } ^{-1 } (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ localization every vertex in $ ([ a ] \cup L_a \
 colponents, say $x, y$. Since $(g_x)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identmty on ${[z]} \cup L_a$, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identity ln the xomplement of $T$. Since $(e_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lwmbda$ is a snperinjective simplicial map, tgcre eriwts $d' \in \lambds([d])$ such thdt $d'$ is disjoitt fxom the complement of $T$, so $d'$ is in $T$. Since $c$ ls the only nogtriniwl sjmple closed curve in $T$ which is nkt isotmpic to $a$ by Xcharlemann’s Theorem in [@Sc], we dee that $d'$ is isotlpic to $d$. Si, $((g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \xirc \lambda) ([a]) = [d]$. Hence, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lamgda$ is identity on ${[a]} \cup L_a \cup D_a$.

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in

Xlqim 2: Let $v$ be aiy 1-sidvd simple closed curva on $N$. Yhen, $(g_v)_{\#} = (g_a)_{\#}$ on $\mavhcao{C}(N)$.

Proof of Claim 2: Siice $g=1$, $\widetilde{X}(N)$ is connecteg yy Theorem 3.10 in [@AK]. So, qe can xind a sdwuevce $a \rjghtargow a_1 \rightardow a_2 \rightqrrow  \cdots \rightatrjq  a_n=v$ of 1-sidsd sim[lq closed curves connecting $a$ to $v$ such uhat sach consecutive pair iw connected by an edgg in $\widetylde{X}(N)$. By Claim 1, $(g_a)_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a]\} \cup L_d \cup A_a$, ckq $(t_{a_1})_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a_1]\} \cup L_{a_1} \cup D_{a_1}$. So, we fse tmat $(g_a)_{\#} ^{-1} (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ fixes every vertrx im $([a] \cup L_a \
components, say $x, y$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ identity ${[a]} \cup $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ of Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ is a superinjective map, there exists $d' \in \lambda([d])$ that $d'$ is disjoint from the complement of $T$, so $d'$ is in Since $d$ is the only nontrivial simple closed curve in $T$ which is isotopic $a$ Scharlemann’s in [@Sc], we see that $d'$ is isotopic to $d$. So, $((g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda) ([d]) = Hence, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$ is identity on ${[a]} L_a \cup D_a$. =2.2in =2.2in =2.2in =2.2in Claim 2: $v$ any 1-sided closed on Then, $(g_v)_{\#} = on $\mathcal{C}(N)$. Proof of Claim 2: Since $g=1$, $\widetilde{X}(N)$ is connected by Theorem 3.10 in [@AK]. So, can find $a \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow a_n=v$ of closed curves connecting $a$ to $v$ consecutive pair is connected by an edge in By Claim $(g_a)_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a]\} L_a \cup D_a$, and $(g_{a_1})_{\#}$ agrees with $\lambda$ $\{[a_1]\} \cup L_{a_1} \cup D_{a_1}$. So, we see that $(g_a)_{\#} ^{-1} (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ fixes every vertex \cup L_a \
 components, say $x, y$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \cirC \lambda$ is iDentiTy oN ${[a]} \cUp l_a$, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \Circ \Lambda$ is identiTY on tHe complement of $T$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \Circ \lAmBDa$ is A SuPerinJective SImPLIciAl MaP, thErE ExIsts $d' \In \lAmbda([d])$ sUch that $d'$ is DisJoInt from the coMPlEment of $T$, so $D'$ is In $T$. Since $d$ is tHe oNly nonTrIviAL simpLe cLosed Curve iN $t$ which Is not isotOpIC to $a$ by sCharlemANN’s theoRem in [@Sc], we see that $d'$ IS iSOtopic to $d$. So, $((g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \cIrc \lamBdA) ([D]) = [d]$. hENce, $(G_a)_{\#}^{-1} \cIrc \lambda$ iS iDentiTY on ${[a]} \cup l_A \cUP d_A$.

=2.2in =2.2IN

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in

Claim 2: LEt $v$ be any 1-sidED siMple clOsEd cURve on $N$. then, $(g_V)_{\#} = (g_A)_{\#}$ On $\mAthcal{C}(N)$.

ProOf of claim 2: SincE $g=1$, $\wideTIlde{X}(N)$ iS ConnectEd by ThEorEm 3.10 iN [@AK]. SO, We CaN fiNd A SeqUEnCe $a \RIghTarrow a_1 \rIgHtArrow A_2 \rigHTARRow  \cDotS \rigHtarrOw  a_n=v$ of 1-sided sImpLe clOSed CurveS connEctiNg $A$ to $v$ sUch thaT each CoNsecutive pair is ConnEcted by an EdgE iN $\wiDeTilde{x}(n)$. By ClaIm 1, $(g_A)_{\#}$ agRees witH $\lambda$ ON $\{[a]\} \cUp l_A \CUp d_a$, and $(g_{a_1})_{\#}$ agrees with $\lAmBDA$ oN $\{[a_1]\} \cup L_{a_1} \cUp D_{a_1}$. So, WE sEe THat $(g_a)_{\#} ^{-1} (g_{a_1})_{\#}$ fIxEs eVery VERtex iN $([a] \cuP l_a \
 components, say $x, y$. S ince $(g_a )_{\# }^{ -1}  \ circ  \la mbda$ is ident i ty o n ${[a]} \cup L_a$, $( g_a)_ {\ # }^{- 1 }\circ  \lambd a $i s  id en ti tyon th e com ple ment of  $T$. Sinc e $ (g _a)_{\#}^{-1 }  \ circ \lamb da$  is a superi nje ctivesi mpl i cialmap , the re exi s ts $d'  \in \lam bd a ([d])$ such th a t  $ d'$is disjoint fromt he complement of$T$, s o$ d' $ isin$T$. Since  $ d$ is the onl y  n o n t riv i al simple clo sed curve i n  $T $ whic hisn ot iso topic  t o  $a $ by Scharl eman n’s Theor em in[ @Sc], w e  see th at $d' $ i s i soto p ic  t o $ d$ .  So ,  $ ((g _ a)_ {\#}^{-1 }\c irc \ lamb d a ) ([d] ) =  [d] $. He nce, $(g_a)_{ \#} ^{-1 }  \c irc \ lambd a$ i sident ity on  ${[a ]}  \cup L_a \cupD_a$ .

=2.2in  =2 .2 in
= 2.2in =2.2in 

= 2.2 in

Cla im 2: L e t $ v$ b e  a ny 1-sided simplecl o s ed  curve o n $N$. Th en ,  $(g_v)_ {\ #}= (g _ a )_{\# }$ o n  $ \mathcal {C}(N) $ .
P roof of  C laim 2 :Sin ce$g=1$ ,  $\w idetil de{X}(N) $ isc onnected by Th e orem 3.10 in[ @A K ] .S o, w e c an find a s eque n ce $ a \r i gh tar r ow a_ 1 \ri gh t ar r ow a_2 \rightarrow \ cdots\righ tarrow  a_n=v $ of 1-sid e d simple c lose d  c u rves connectin g $a$  to $v$ su c h that e ach c onsecuti ve pair i s connecte d b y a n e dge i n$\widetilde{X } ( N)$.  B y Claim  1,  $(g_a) _{\ #}$  ag ree swith $\la mbda$ on  $ \{ [a ]\ } \ cup L _ a \cup D _a $,an d $ (g_{a _ 1})_{\ #}$ a gree swi t h $ \lambda $  o n $\{[ a_ 1] \} \ cup  L _{a_1 } \c u p D _{a_1}$ . So, wesee that  $ (g _a)_{\# } ^{-1} (g_{a _1 })_{\#}$ f ix eseveryv e rtex in$([a] \cup L_a \
 components,_say $x,_y$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ_\lambda$ is_identity_on ${[a]}_\cup_L_a$, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ_\lambda$ is identity_on the complement of_$T$. Since $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1}_\circ_\lambda$ is a superinjective simplicial map, there exists $d' \in \lambda([d])$ such that $d'$_is_disjoint from_the_complement_of $T$, so $d'$ is_in $T$. Since $d$ is_the only_nontrivial simple closed curve in $T$ which is_not_isotopic to $a$_by Scharlemann’s Theorem in [@Sc], we see that $d'$_is isotopic to $d$. So, $((g_a)_{\#}^{-1}_\circ \lambda) ([d])_=_[d]$._Hence, $(g_a)_{\#}^{-1} \circ \lambda$_is identity on ${[a]} \cup L_a_\cup D_a$.

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in =2.2in

=2.2in

Claim 2: Let_$v$ be any 1-sided simple closed curve_on $N$. Then, $(g_v)_{\#} = (g_a)_{\#}$_on $\mathcal{C}(N)$.

Proof of Claim 2:_Since $g=1$,_$\widetilde{X}(N)$ is connected by Theorem_3.10 in [@AK]._So, we_can find a_sequence $a \rightarrow a_1 \rightarrow a_2_\rightarrow  \cdots_\rightarrow  a_n=v$ of 1-sided simple_closed_curves connecting $a$_to_$v$_such that_each consecutive pair_is_connected by_an_edge in $\widetilde{X}(N)$. By Claim 1,_$(g_a)_{\#}$_agrees with $\lambda$ on $\{[a]\} \cup L_a_\cup D_a$, and $(g_{a_1})_{\#}$_agrees_with $\lambda$ on $\{[a_1]\}_\cup L_{a_1} \cup D_{a_1}$. So,_we see that $(g_a)_{\#} ^{-1} (g_{a_1})_{\#}$_fixes every_vertex in_$([a] \cup L_a \