.g., @2009ApJ...696..484B). The latter term may also contain a zero point offset. The optical thickness map can be obtained from $$\tau^{8\,\mum} = -\ln \left \{ \frac{I^{8\,\mum}-I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}}
{ I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}} \right \} \;.$$ In order to estimate the background emission, $I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}$, we made a fit to the surface brightness distribution with the core masked out. For masking we used the SCUBA-2 $850\,\mum$ map. The foreground component, $I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}$ (including possible zero-point offset), was assumed to be constant in the mapped region. Its value was estimated by requiring that the ratio of the peak optical thicknesses is $\tau^{8\,\mum}/\tau^{850\,\mum}=780$, corresponding to the adopted dust opacity model, which was the model for unprocessed dust grains with thin ice mantles by. The comparison was done using an IRAC map smoothed to the resolutions of the SCUBA map.

At $850\,\mum$, the core is optically thin and it is seen in thermal dust emission. The observing method filters out extended emission. The surface brightness is therefore $I^{850\,\mum} = B^{850\,\mum}(T_{\rm
  d})\,\tau^{850\,\mum}$, where $T_{\rm d}$ is the dust temperature and $B$ is the Planck function. The opacity map at $850\,\mum$, $\tau^{850\,\mum}$, was calculated by combining the $850\,\mum$ surface brightness map with the dust color temperature map, $T_{\rm
  C}$, derived from Herschel/SPIRE maps. The angular resolution of the $T_{\rm C}$ map is $\sim 40\arcsec$, whereas for SCUBA it is approximately $14\arcsec$. We think this discrepancy in the angular resolutions is acceptable because the $850\,\mum$ surface brightness is not very sensitive to the dust temperaure (see below).

Finally, $\htwo$ column density map shown in Fig. \[figure:line\_maps\]d) was calculated by dividing the $8\,\mum$ optical thickness map by the absorption cross-section of dust per $\htwo$ molecule, which
.g. , @2009ApJ... 696.. 484B). The latter term may also contain a zero point stolon. The ocular thickness map can be obtained from $ $ \tau^{8\,\mum } = -\ln \left \ { \frac{I^{8\,\mum}-I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum } } 
 { I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum } } \right \ } \;.$$ In order to calculate the background emission, $ I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}$, we made a paroxysm to the surface brightness distribution with the kernel masked out. For masking we use the SCUBA-2 $ 850\,\mum$ map. The foreground component, $ I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}$ (include potential zero - point offset), was assume to be constant in the mapped region. Its value was estimate by requiring that the ratio of the peak ocular thicknesses is $ \tau^{8\,\mum}/\tau^{850\,\mum}=780 $, corresponding to the adopted dust opacity exemplar, which was the model for unprocessed dust grains with thin internal-combustion engine mantles by. The comparison was done using an IRAC map smoothed to the resolutions of the SCUBA map. 

 At $ 850\,\mum$, the core is optically thin and it is seen in thermal dust emission. The observing method filters out extended emission. The open brightness is therefore $ I^{850\,\mum } = B^{850\,\mum}(T_{\rm 
   d})\,\tau^{850\,\mum}$, where $ T_{\rm d}$ is the debris temperature and $ B$ is the Planck affair. The opacity function at $ 850\,\mum$, $ \tau^{850\,\mum}$, was calculated by combining the $ 850\,\mum$ surface brightness map with the dust color temperature map, $ T_{\rm 
   C}$, derive from Herschel / SPIRE maps. The angular resolution of the $ T_{\rm C}$ map is $ \sim 40\arcsec$, whereas for SCUBA it is approximately $ 14\arcsec$. We think this discrepancy in the angular resoluteness is acceptable because the $ 850\,\mum$ surface brightness is not very sensitive to the dust temperaure (see downstairs). 

 Finally, $ \htwo$ column density map shown in Fig.   \[figure: line\_maps\]d) was calculated by separate the $ 8\,\mum$ optical thickness map by the absorption cross - section of dust per $ \htwo$ molecule, which
.g., @2009AoJ...696..484B). The latter term may xlso contain a eeeo poiit offsst. The ootical thickness map can be lbrainee from $$\tau^{8\,\mum} = -\ln \left \{ \frac{I^{8\,\mul}-I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mym}}
{ I_{\cm bg}^{8\,\mum}} \right \} \;.$$ In ordev to sdtimctx the backgrounc emission, $I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}$, we kaae a fit to the surface brightness diftributooj with the corg maslqd ohn. Nor masking we used the SCUBA-2 $850\,\muj$ map. Tie foreground cpmponent, $I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}$ (includijg plssible zero-point lffset), was qssuiwd to be conrtant in the mapped refion. Its value was estimated by requnring that jkw rwjio of the pxak opnical thicknesses is $\dau^{8\,\mum}/\tsu^{850\,\mum}=780$, correspokding to the adopted dust oparity model, which was the moden yor unprocessed dust trqins fith thiv icd mznvlea by. Tje romparison sas done usung an IRAC map smoptrvc to the resklutiogs of the SCUBA map.

At $850\,\mum$, the core is optpcalmy thin and it is seen un thermal dust emisslon. The ofserving method filters out extended emission. The surfecd bxlnhtndws is therefore $I^{850\,\mum} = B^{850\,\mum}(T_{\rm
  d})\,\tau^{850\,\mum}$, where $T_{\ri d}$ ix the dust temierature and $B$ is yhf Ljanck functiov. The opadity map at $850\,\mum$, $\tak^{850\,\mum}$, waf calxulated br cokbining the $850\,\mum$ surface brithtness map city the dust color tzmperature mcp, $T_{\rm
  C}$, drrived from Herschel/SPIXE mapa. The angulwr resolufkon of the $T_{\rm C}$ mai is $\sim 40\arcsec$, whereas for SCTBA it is appxoximateuy $14\atcsec$. Wq think thls discrepancy in the anhular rasolutions is acceptable because the $850\,\mum$ surface brightmevs ps not vexy senxitive to the dust temperaute (see bejow).

Fivally, $\htwo$ column density ma[ shown in Fic. \[vigure:line\_ma's\]d) was cwlcuoatee by dixkding the $8\,\mum$ pptical tknckness mqp by the absorptipn zdoss-section of bbsu per $\htwo$ molecile, whycj
.g., @2009ApJ...696..484B). The latter term may also zero offset. The thickness map can -\ln \{ \frac{I^{8\,\mum}-I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}} I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}} \right \;.$$ In order to estimate the emission, $I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}$, we made a fit to the surface brightness distribution with core masked out. For masking we used the SCUBA-2 $850\,\mum$ map. The foreground $I_{\rm (including zero-point was assumed to be constant in the mapped region. Its value was estimated by requiring that ratio of the peak optical thicknesses is $\tau^{8\,\mum}/\tau^{850\,\mum}=780$, to the adopted dust model, which was the model unprocessed grains with ice by. comparison was done an IRAC map smoothed to the resolutions of the SCUBA map. At $850\,\mum$, the core is optically and it in thermal emission. observing filters out extended surface brightness is therefore $I^{850\,\mum} = $T_{\rm d}$ is the dust temperature and $B$ the Planck The opacity map at $850\,\mum$, $\tau^{850\,\mum}$, calculated by combining the $850\,\mum$ surface brightness map the dust color temperature map, $T_{\rm C}$, derived from Herschel/SPIRE maps. The angular resolution of C}$ map is $\sim whereas for SCUBA is $14\arcsec$. think discrepancy in angular resolutions is acceptable because the $850\,\mum$ surface brightness is not sensitive to the dust temperaure (see below). Finally, $\htwo$ column shown Fig. \[figure:line\_maps\]d) was by dividing the $8\,\mum$ thickness by the absorption cross-section per molecule,
.g., @2009ApJ...696..484B). The latter term may also Contain a zeRo poiNt oFfsEt. the oPticAl thickness map CAn be Obtained from $$\tau^{8\,\mum} = -\ln \leFt \{ \fraC{I^{8\,\MUm}-I_{\rM Fg}^{8\,\Mum}}
{ I_{\rM bg}^{8\,\mum}} \rIGhT \} \;.$$ iN orDeR tO esTiMAtE the bAckGround eMission, $I_{\rm Bg}^{8\,\mUm}$, We made a fit to THe Surface briGhtNess distribuTioN with tHe CorE MaskeD ouT. For mAsking WE used tHe SCUBA-2 $850\,\muM$ mAP. The foREground COMpOnenT, $I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}$ (includinG PoSSible zero-point Offset), WaS AsSUMed To bE constant iN tHe mapPEd regioN. itS VALue WAs estimated by Requiring thAT thE ratio Of The PEak optIcal tHiCKneSses is $\tau^{8\,\muM}/\tau^{850\,\Mum}=780$, corresPondinG To the adOPted dusT opaciTy mOdeL, whiCH wAs The MoDEl fOR uNprOCesSed dust gRaInS with Thin ICE MAntlEs bY. The CompaRison was done uSinG an IraC mAp smoOthed To thE rEsoluTions oF the ScUbA map.

At $850\,\mum$, the coRe is Optically ThiN aNd iT iS seen IN thermAl dUst EmissioN. The obsERviNg METHoD filters out extendeD eMISsIon. The suRface bRIgHtNEss is theReForE $I^{850\,\muM} = b^{850\,\Mum}(T_{\rM
  d})\,\taU^{850\,\MuM}$, where $T_{\rM d}$ is thE DuSt TemperaTuRe and $B$ Is The plaNck fuNCtioN. The opAcity map At $850\,\mum$, $\TAu^{850\,\mum}$, was calculATed by combininG ThE $850\,\MUm$ SUrfaCe bRightness maP witH The dUst cOLoR teMPeratUre maP, $T_{\RM
  C}$, DErived from Herschel/SpIrE maps. the anGular resolutiOn of the $T_{\rm c}$ MAP is $\sim 40\arCsec$, WHeREas for SCUBA it iS apprOximately $14\aRCsec$. We thInk thIs discrePancy in thE ANgular reSolUtiOns Is aCCEpTable because tHE $850\,\Mum$ sUrFace briGhtNess is nOt vEry SenSitIvE to the dusT temperaUrE (sEe BeLow).

finalLY, $\htwo$ colUmN deNsIty Map shOWn in FiG. \[figuRe:liNe\_MaPS\]d) wAs calcuLAtED By diViDiNg thE $8\,\muM$ oPticaL thiCKneSs map by The absorpTioN CrosS-sEcTion of dUst per $\htwo$ molEcUle, which
.g., @2009ApJ...696..484B) . The latt er te rmmay  a lsocont ain a zero poi n t of fset. The optical thic kness  m a p ca n  b e obt ained f r om $ $\t au ^{ 8\, \m u m}  = -\ ln\left \ { \frac{I^ {8\ ,\ mum}-I_{\rmf g} ^{8\,\mum} }
{  I_{\rm bg}^ {8\ ,\mum} }\ri g ht \}  \; .$$ I n orde r  to es timate th eb ackgro u nd emis s i on , $I _{\rm bg}^{8\,\mu m }$ ,  we made a fit  to th es ur f a cebri ghtness di st ribut i on with th e c ore masked out. F or maskingw e u sed th eSCU B A-2 $8 50\,\ mu m $ m ap. The for egro und compo nent,$ I_{\rmf g}^{8\, \mum}$  (i ncl udin g  p os sib le zer o -p oin t  of fset), w as  a ssume d to b e cons tan t in  themapped region . I ts v a lue  wasestim ated  b y req uiring  that  t he ratio of the  pea k optical  th ic kne ss es is $\tau^ {8\ ,\m um}/\ta u^{850\ , \mu m} = 7 8 0$ , corresponding to  t h e  a dopted d ust op a ci ty model, w hi chwast h e mod el f o runproces sed du s tgr ains wi th  thinic e m ant les b y . Th e comp arison w as do n e using an IRA C  map smoothed to t he reso lut ions of the  SCU B A ma p.
A t$85 0 \,\mu m$, t he co r e is optically thin  a nd itis se en in thermal  dust emis s i o n. The o bser v in g  method filter s out  extendede mission.  Thesurfacebrightnes s is there for e $ I^{ 850 \ , \m um} = B^{850\ , \ mum} (T _{\rm
 d} )\,\tau ^{8 50\ ,\m um} $,  where $T _{\rm d} $is  t he  du st te m perature  a nd$B $ i s the Planck  func tion .Th e  op acity m a pa t  $85 0\ ,\ mum$ , $ \t au^{8 50\, \ mum }$, was  calculat edb y co mb in ing the  $850\,\mum$su rface brig ht nes s mapw i th the d ust color temperature m a p, $T_{ \rm 
  C} $, d erived fr omHersch el/ S PIRE m aps. T he an gu lar r esolu t i on  of  t he $T_{\rm C }$map i s$\si m 40\ar csec$, whereas for SCU BA it is appr oxi mate l y  $ 14\ a rc s ec$ .W e t h i nk this discrep ancy in th ea ng ular resol u tio ns  is acc eptable  beca u se the$850\,\mu m$ surfac ebrig h t nes s is not v ery sens itive tot he du s ttempe rau re (se ebel ow).
Final l y,$\htw o$ col um n dens ity m ap  shown i n Fig. \[figure:line\_m aps\]d ) was  ca lculatedbyd ivi ding the$8\, \mum$ opti cal  th ickne ssm ap by  the ab sor p tioncros s -sectiono fdus t pe r $\htwo$ m o l e cul e, wh ich 
.g., @2009ApJ...696..484B)._The latter_term may also contain_a zero_point_offset. The_optical_thickness map can_be obtained from_$$\tau^{8\,\mum} = -\ln \left_\{ \frac{I^{8\,\mum}-I_{\rm fg}^{8\,\mum}}
{_I_{\rm_bg}^{8\,\mum}} \right \} \;.$$ In order to estimate the background emission, $I_{\rm bg}^{8\,\mum}$, we_made_a fit_to_the_surface brightness distribution with the_core masked out. For masking_we used_the SCUBA-2 $850\,\mum$ map. The foreground component, $I_{\rm_fg}^{8\,\mum}$_(including possible zero-point_offset), was assumed to be constant in the mapped_region. Its value was estimated by_requiring that the_ratio_of_the peak optical thicknesses_is $\tau^{8\,\mum}/\tau^{850\,\mum}=780$, corresponding to the adopted_dust opacity model, which was the_model for unprocessed dust grains with thin_ice mantles by. The comparison was_done using an IRAC map_smoothed to_the resolutions of the SCUBA_map.

At $850\,\mum$, the_core is_optically thin and_it is seen in thermal dust_emission. The observing_method filters out extended emission. The_surface_brightness is therefore_$I^{850\,\mum}_=_B^{850\,\mum}(T_{\rm
 _d})\,\tau^{850\,\mum}$, where $T_{\rm_d}$_is the_dust_temperature and $B$ is the Planck_function._The opacity map at $850\,\mum$, $\tau^{850\,\mum}$, was_calculated by combining the_$850\,\mum$_surface brightness map with_the dust color temperature map,_$T_{\rm
  C}$, derived from Herschel/SPIRE_maps. The_angular resolution_of the $T_{\rm C}$ map is $\sim 40\arcsec$, whereas for SCUBA_it is approximately $14\arcsec$. We think_this discrepancy in the_angular resolutions_is_acceptable because the_$850\,\mum$_surface brightness_is not very sensitive to the dust_temperaure (see_below).

Finally, $\htwo$ column density map shown_in Fig. \[figure:line\_maps\]d) was calculated_by_dividing the $8\,\mum$ optical thickness map_by the absorption cross-section of dust_per $\htwo$ molecule, which