\hspace{%
0.12in}  \label{aperp} \\
\vec{a}_{\Vert } &=&\frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vec{r}{\bf \times }\vec{n}_{z}]}{%
\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\left( \frac{x_{1}\sigma _{1}}{\lambda _{1}}+\frac{%
x_{2}\sigma _{2}}{\lambda _{2}}\right)  \label{apar};\end{aligned}$$ $\sigma_i$ denote the Pauli matrices and $B$ is the magnetic field in the direction \[001\] perpendicular to the lateral quantum dot. The coordinates $x_1$ and $x_2$ are along the directions $[110]$ and $[1\bar{1}0]$ and we neglected the Zeeman splitting term as we are interested in the behavior at relatively low magnetic fields. The term $\vec{a}_{\Vert }$ is responsible for spin-flips but it is of higher order in the spin-orbit coupling strength than $\vec{a}_{\bot}$. Thus, it will be neglected in the following as we assume the spin-orbit coupling to be weak such that $\vec{a}_{\bot}$ dominates. The $\vec{a}_{\bot}$ term has exactly the same form as the vector potential $\vec{A}$ except for its spin-dependence. As an electron collects an Aharonov-Bohm flux on a close path due to the vector potential $\vec{A}$, it also collects a spin-dependent flux due to $\vec{a}_{\bot}$. This spin dependent flux translates to a spin-dependent effective magnetic field, so that the electrons feel a total magnetic field of strength $B^{\rm eff}_{\sigma}= B+ \frac{c}{e}\frac{1}{\lambda_1 \lambda_2}
\frac {\sigma}{2}
$ with $\sigma=\pm\hbar$ for up- and down-spin, respectively. An increase of the flux changes the matrix elements, and scrambles the eigenenergies and eigenvectors. In the absence of spin-orbit coupling, the flux is exactly the same for spin-up and spin-down electrons such that their eigenenergies and eigenvectors are degenerate. If the spin-orbit terms are present, but no external magnetic field is applied, the time-reversal symmetry is preserved, and the states are still Kramers degenerate (up-spin and down
\hspace{% 
 0.12 in }   \label{aperp } \\ 
 \vec{a}_{\Vert } & = & \frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vec{r}{\bf \times } \vec{n}_{z}]}{% 
 \lambda _ { 1}\lambda _ { 2}}\left (\frac{x_{1}\sigma _ { 1}}{\lambda _ { 1}}+\frac{% 
 x_{2}\sigma _ { 2}}{\lambda _ { 2}}\right)   \label{apar};\end{aligned}$$ $ \sigma_i$ denote the Pauli matrices and $ B$ is the magnetic field in the steering \[001\ ] vertical to the lateral quantum dot. The coordinates $ x_1 $ and $ x_2 $ are along the direction $ [ 110]$ and $ [ 1\bar{1}0]$ and we fail the Zeeman splitting term as we are interested in the demeanor at relatively low magnetic fields. The condition $ \vec{a}_{\Vert } $ is responsible for spin - flip but it is of higher order in the tailspin - orbit coupling strength than $ \vec{a}_{\bot}$. Thus, it will be neglected in the following as we assume the tailspin - orbit coupling to be weak such that $ \vec{a}_{\bot}$ dominates. The $ \vec{a}_{\bot}$ terminus has exactly the like form as the vector likely $ \vec{A}$ except for its spin - dependence. As an electron collects an Aharonov - Bohm flux on a close path due to the vector electric potential $ \vec{A}$, it also collects a spin - dependent flux due to $ \vec{a}_{\bot}$. This spin pendent flux translates to a spin - dependent effective magnetic field, so that the electrons feel a total magnetic battlefield of strength $ B^{\rm eff}_{\sigma}= B+ \frac{c}{e}\frac{1}{\lambda_1 \lambda_2 } 
 \frac { \sigma}{2 } 
 $ with $ \sigma=\pm\hbar$ for up- and down - spin, respectively. An addition of the magnetic field transfer the matrix elements, and scrambles the eigenenergies and eigenvectors. In the absence of tailspin - orbit yoke, the flux is exactly the same for tailspin - up and spin - down electrons such that their eigenenergies and eigenvectors are degenerate. If the spin - orbit terms are present, but no external charismatic field is applied, the time - reversal symmetry is preserved, and the states are however Kramers degenerate (up - spin and down
\hspwce{%
0.12in}  \label{aperp} \\
\vec{a}_{\Vevt } &=&\frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vec{r}{\yd \timev }\vec{n}_{a}]}{%
\lambda _{1}\uambda _{2}}\left( \frac{x_{1}\sigma _{1}}{\lambde _{1}}+\frqc{%
x_{2}\sitma _{2}}{\lambda _{2}}\right)  \labeu{apar};\end{apigned}$$ $\sugma_m$ denote the Pauli matrigzs ans $B$ iv the magnetic nield in tha direction \[001\] paroeudicular to the lateral quantum dot. Ehe cootdlnates $x_1$ and $x_2$ are wlonf the directions $[110]$ and $[1\bar{1}0]$ and we nsglectev the Zeeman spkitting term as we are intfreshed in the behaviog at relaticely oow magnetic fields. Tht cerm $\vec{a}_{\Vett }$ is responsible for spin-flips but nt is of hithwr ltder in the wpin-ogbit coupling strengtv than $\fec{a}_{\bot}$. Thus, ib wiln bw neglected in the fonlowing as we assuie the sphn-krbit coupling to bw wean suwh tfqt $\xec{z}_{\bpt}$ dominwtea. The $\vec{a}_{\got}$ term haw exactly the same gown as the vectkr potqneial $\vec{A}$ except for its spin-dependence. As an electron collects ab Aharonov-Bohm flux oj a close path due to the vector potential $\vec{A}$, it also conlecta a wpln-deownfent flux due to $\vec{a}_{\bot}$. This spin dependent smuc nranslates to a siin-dependent effecyige iagnetic fiela, so tkzt the electrons feep a totwl matnetic fitld og strength $B^{\rm eff}_{\sigma}= B+ \feac{c}{e}\frac{1}{\lamyda_1 \lambda_2}
\frac {\sigma}{2}
$ cith $\sigma=\pm\kbar$ fpr up- and down-spin, respectivzly. An increase ov the flus changes the matfix enements, and scrambles the qigenenerjies cnd eigevvecjors. In the absenfe of spin-orbit coupling, the ylux hs exactly the same for spin-up and spin-doxi electrons soch thdt their eigekenergies and eygenvectors arg degenercte. If the spin-ogbit termv are presegt, but no extatnal magnetic field if appliee, the tkoe-reversal symketry is irtserved, ane the states are sbill Ydamers degeneract (uk-spin and down
\hspace{% 0.12in} \label{aperp} \\ \vec{a}_{\Vert } &=&\frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vec{r}{\bf \lambda _{2}}\left( \frac{x_{1}\sigma _{1}}+\frac{% x_{2}\sigma _{2}}{\lambda Pauli and $B$ is magnetic field in direction \[001\] perpendicular to the lateral dot. The coordinates $x_1$ and $x_2$ are along the directions $[110]$ and $[1\bar{1}0]$ we neglected the Zeeman splitting term as we are interested in the behavior relatively magnetic The $\vec{a}_{\Vert }$ is responsible for spin-flips but it is of higher order in the spin-orbit coupling than $\vec{a}_{\bot}$. Thus, it will be neglected in following as we assume spin-orbit coupling to be weak that dominates. The term exactly same form as vector potential $\vec{A}$ except for its spin-dependence. As an electron collects an Aharonov-Bohm flux on a close due to potential $\vec{A}$, also a flux due to spin dependent flux translates to a field, so that the electrons feel a total field of $B^{\rm eff}_{\sigma}= B+ \frac{c}{e}\frac{1}{\lambda_1 \lambda_2} \frac $ with $\sigma=\pm\hbar$ for up- and down-spin, respectively. increase of the flux changes the matrix elements, and scrambles the eigenenergies and eigenvectors. In of spin-orbit coupling, the is exactly the for and electrons that their and eigenvectors are degenerate. If the spin-orbit terms are present, but external magnetic field is applied, the time-reversal symmetry is preserved, states still Kramers degenerate and down
\hspace{%
0.12in}  \label{aperp} \\
\vec{a}_{\VerT } &=&\frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vEc{r}{\bf \TimEs }\vEc{N}_{z}]}{%
\laMbda _{1}\Lambda _{2}}\left( \frac{X_{1}\SigmA _{1}}{\lambda _{1}}+\frac{%
x_{2}\sigma _{2}}{\lambdA _{2}}\righT)  \lABel{aPAr};\End{alIgned}$$ $\siGMa_I$ DEnoTe ThE PaUlI MaTriceS anD $B$ is the Magnetic fiEld In The direction \[001\] PErPendicular To tHe lateral quaNtuM dot. ThE cOorDInateS $x_1$ aNd $x_2$ arE along THe direCtions $[110]$ and $[1\BaR{1}0]$ And we nEGlected THE ZEemaN splitting term as wE ArE Interested in thE behavIoR At RELatIveLy low magneTiC fielDS. The terM $\VeC{A}_{\vErt }$ IS responsible fOr spin-flips BUt iT is of hIgHer ORder in The spIn-ORbiT coupling stRengTh than $\vec{A}_{\bot}$. ThUS, it will BE neglecTed in tHe fOllOwinG As We AssUmE The SPiN-orBIt cOupling tO bE wEak suCh thAT $\VEC{a}_{\boT}$ doMinaTes. ThE $\vec{a}_{\bot}$ term hAs eXactLY thE same Form aS the VeCtor pOtentiAl $\vec{a}$ eXcept for its spin-DepeNdence. As aN elEcTroN cOllecTS an AhaRonOv-BOhm flux On a closE PatH dUE TO tHe vector potential $\vEc{a}$, IT aLso colleCts a spIN-dEpENdent fluX dUe tO $\vec{A}_{\BOt}$. ThiS spiN DePendent fLux traNSlAtEs to a spIn-DependEnT efFecTive mAGnetIc fielD, so that tHe eleCTrons feel a totaL Magnetic field OF sTREnGTh $B^{\rM efF}_{\sigma}= B+ \frac{C}{e}\frAC{1}{\lamBda_1 \lAMbDa_2}
\fRAc {\sigMa}{2}
$ witH $\sIGmA=\Pm\hbar$ for up- and down-sPiN, respeCtiveLy. An increase oF the flux chANGEs the matRix eLEmENts, and scrambleS the eIgenenergiES and eigeNvectOrs. In the Absence of SPIn-orbit cOupLinG, thE flUX Is Exactly the samE FOr spIn-Up and spIn-dOwn elecTroNs sUch ThaT tHeir eigenEnergies AnD eIgEnVecTors aRE degenerAtE. If ThE spIn-orbIT terms Are prEsenT, bUt NO exTernal mAGnETIc fiElD iS appLieD, tHe timE-revERsaL symmetRy is preseRveD, And tHe StAtes are Still Kramers dEgEnerate (up-sPiN anD down
\hspace{%
0.12in}  \label{ aperp} \\\vec{ a}_ {\V er t }&=&\ frac{1}{6}\fra c {[\v ec{r}{\bf \times }\vec {n}_{ z} ] }{%\ la mbda_{1}\la m bd a _{2 }} \l eft (\ fr ac{x_ {1} \sigma_{1}}{\lam bda  _ {1}}+\frac{% x_ {2}\sigma_{2 }}{\lambda _ {2} }\righ t)   \ l abel{ apa r};\e nd{ali g ned}$$  $\sigma_ i$ denote the Pau l i  m atri ces and $B$ is th e  m a gnetic field i n thedi r ec t i on\[0 01\] perpe nd icula r  to the la t e r alq uantum dot. T he coordina t es$x_1$an d $ x _2$ ar e alo ng the  directions  $[1 10]$ and$[1\ba r {1}0]$a nd we n eglect edthe  Zee m an  s pli tt i ngt er m a s  we  are int er es ted i n th e b e havi orat r elati vely low magn eti c fi e lds . The  term  $\v ec {a}_{ \Vert}$ is  r esponsible forspin -flips bu t i tisof  high e r orde r i n t he spin -orbitc oup li n g st rength than $\vec{ a} _ { \b ot}$. Th us, it wi ll be negle ct edin t h e  foll owin g  a s we ass ume th e  s pi n-orbit  c ouplin gtobeweaks uchthat $ \vec{a}_ {\bot } $ dominates. T h e $\vec{a}_{\ b ot } $  t e rm h asexactly the  sam e  for m as th e v e ctorpoten ti a l$ \vec{A}$ except for  i ts spi n-dep endence. As a n electron c o llects a n Ah a ro n ov-Bohm flux o n a c lose pathd ue to th e vec tor pote ntial $\v e c {A}$, it  al socol lec t s  a  spin-depende n t  flu xdue to$\v ec{a}_{ \bo t}$ . T his  s pin depen dent flu xtr an sl ate s toa  spin-de pe nde nt  ef fecti v e magn eticfiel d,  s o  th at thee le c t rons  f ee l atot al  magn etic fie ld of s trength $ B^{ \ rm e ff }_ {\sigma }= B+ \frac{c }{ e}\frac{1} {\ lam bda_1\ l ambda_2} 
\frac {\sigma}{2}
$ wi t h $\sig ma= \pm\h bar$  for up-and  down- spi n , resp ective ly. A ninc r e ase o f th e f lu x changest h e m atrix  e leme nts, an d scrambles the ei g ene nergies and e ige nvec t o rs . I n  t h e a bs e nce o f spin-orbit co upling, th ef lu x is exact l y t he  same f or spin -up a n d spin- down elec trons suc hthat t hei r eigenene rgies an d eigenve c torsa re  dege ner ate. I fthe  spin -orbit ter ms ar e pres en t, but  no e xt ernal ma gnetic field is applied , thetime- rev ersal sym met r y i s preserv ed,and the st ate s a re st ill Krame rs d e ge ner a te (u p-sp i n and dow n 
\hspace{%
0.12in} _\label{aperp} \\
\vec{a}_{\Vert_} &=&\frac{1}{6}\frac{[\vec{r}{\bf \times }\vec{n}_{z}]}{%
\lambda__{1}\lambda _{2}}\left(_\frac{x_{1}\sigma__{1}}{\lambda _{1}}+\frac{%
x_{2}\sigma__{2}}{\lambda__{2}}\right)  \label{apar};\end{aligned}$$_$\sigma_i$ denote the_Pauli matrices and $B$_is the magnetic_field_in the direction \[001\] perpendicular to the lateral quantum dot. The coordinates $x_1$ and_$x_2$_are along_the_directions_$[110]$ and $[1\bar{1}0]$ and we_neglected the Zeeman splitting term_as we_are interested in the behavior at relatively low_magnetic_fields. The term_$\vec{a}_{\Vert }$ is responsible for spin-flips but it is_of higher order in the spin-orbit_coupling strength than_$\vec{a}_{\bot}$._Thus,_it will be neglected_in the following as we assume_the spin-orbit coupling to be weak_such that $\vec{a}_{\bot}$ dominates. The $\vec{a}_{\bot}$ term_has exactly the same form as_the vector potential $\vec{A}$ except_for its_spin-dependence. As an electron collects_an Aharonov-Bohm flux_on a_close path due_to the vector potential $\vec{A}$, it_also collects a_spin-dependent flux due to $\vec{a}_{\bot}$. This_spin_dependent flux translates_to_a_spin-dependent effective_magnetic field, so_that_the electrons_feel_a total magnetic field of strength_$B^{\rm_eff}_{\sigma}= B+ \frac{c}{e}\frac{1}{\lambda_1 \lambda_2}
\frac {\sigma}{2}
$ with $\sigma=\pm\hbar$_for up- and down-spin,_respectively._An increase of the_flux changes the matrix elements,_and scrambles the eigenenergies and eigenvectors._In the_absence of_spin-orbit coupling, the flux is exactly the same for spin-up and_spin-down electrons such that their eigenenergies_and eigenvectors are degenerate._If the_spin-orbit_terms are present,_but_no external_magnetic field is applied, the time-reversal symmetry_is preserved,_and the states are still Kramers_degenerate (up-spin and down