 $$\begin{aligned}
&&  \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} |{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds +  \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} \int_\cU e^{2\rho s} |{\widehat}\psi_s(u)|^2 \pi(du,ds) + \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} d{\widehat}M_{s} \\ 
&& \quad =  2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s \left( f(s,Y^m_s,Z^m_s,\psi^m_s) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s) -  \rho |{\widehat}Y_s|^2 \right) ds \\
&& \qquad + 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s)ds\\
&& \qquad -2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}{\widehat}Y_{s} {\widehat}Z_s dW_s  -2\int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_{s^-} d{\widehat}M_s  - 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} \int_\cU {\widehat}Y_{s^-} {\widehat}\psi_s(u)  \tpi(du,ds).\end{aligned}$$ With the same arguments used to obtain, the assumptions on $f$, Burkholder-Davis-Gundy ($p/2 \geq 1$) and Young’s inequality lead to: $$\begin{aligned}
  \nonumber
&& \E \left( \int_{n\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} |{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds \right)^{p/2}+ \E\left(  \int
$ $ \begin{aligned } 
 & &   \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau } e^{2\rho s } |{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds +   \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau } \int_\cU e^{2\rho s } |{\widehat}\psi_s(u)|^2 \pi(du, ds) + \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s } d{\widehat}M_{s } \\ 
 & & \quad =   2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s } { \widehat}Y_s \left (f(s, Y^m_s, Z^m_s,\psi^m_s) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s) -   \rho |{\widehat}Y_s|^2 \right) ds \\ 
 & & \qquad + 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s } { \widehat}Y_s f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s)ds\\ 
 & & \qquad -2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau } e^{2\rho s}{\widehat}Y_{s } { \widehat}Z_s dW_s   -2\int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s } { \widehat}Y_{s^- } d{\widehat}M_s   - 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s } \int_\cU { \widehat}Y_{s^- } { \widehat}\psi_s(u)   \tpi(du, ds).\end{aligned}$$ With the same arguments used to obtain, the assumption on $ f$, Burkholder - Davis - Gundy ($ p/2 \geq 1 $) and Young ’s inequality spark advance to: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   \nonumber 
 & & \E \left (\int_{n\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau } e^{2\rho s } |{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds \right)^{p/2}+ \E\left (  \int
 $$\behin{aligned}
&&  \int_{t\wedge \tam}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} |{\wideiat}Z_s|^2 da +  \int_{t\dedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} \int_\cU e^{2\rio s} |{\wideyat}\psi_s(u)|^2 \pi(du,ds) + \int_{t\wddge \tau}^{m\aedge \tay}e^{2\rhi s} d{\widehav}J_{s} \\ 
&& \quad =  2 \jkt_{t\webgx \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}g^{2\rho s} {\widehdt}Y_s \left( f(s,Y^m_v,Z^o_s,\'si^m_s) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s) -  \rho |{\widehat}Y_f|^2 \right) dd \\
&& \qquad + 2 \int_{j\wedgt \twu}^{m\wsdge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\famma_s)dv\\
&& \qquad -2 \int_{t\eedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}{\aidejat}Y_{s} {\widehat}Z_s dW_d  -2\int_{t\wedgg \tat}^{n\wedge \tau}e^{2\rfo s} {\widehat}Y_{s^-} d{\widehaj}M_s  - 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rfo s} \nnt_\cU {\widehqt}T_{s^-} {\ahdehat}\psi_s(u)  \tpi(qu,ds).\end{aligncc}$$ With the sake arguments uxed to obtain, the assumptiois on $f$, Burkholder-Dadis-Gundy ($[/2 \yeq 1$) and Young’s inequqluty lgad tm: $$\beeun{auighev}
  \honumbfr
&& \X \left( \int_{n\sedge \tau}^{m\wwdge \tau} e^{2\rho s} |{\widthae}D_x|^2 ds \right)^{p/2}+ \S\left(  \igt
$$\begin{aligned} && \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} + \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} |{\widehat}\psi_s(u)|^2 s} \\ && \quad 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge s} {\widehat}Y_s \left( f(s,Y^m_s,Z^m_s,\psi^m_s) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s) - |{\widehat}Y_s|^2 \right) ds \\ && \qquad + 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s && \qquad -2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}{\widehat}Y_{s} {\widehat}Z_s dW_s -2\int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho {\widehat}Y_{s^-} - \int_{t\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} \int_\cU {\widehat}Y_{s^-} {\widehat}\psi_s(u) \tpi(du,ds).\end{aligned}$$ With the same arguments used to obtain, the assumptions on Burkholder-Davis-Gundy ($p/2 \geq 1$) and Young’s inequality lead $$\begin{aligned} \nonumber && \E \int_{n\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s} ds \E\left( \int
 $$\begin{aligned}
&&  \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\Wedge \tau} e^{2\rHo s} |{\wiDehAt}Z_S|^2 dS +  \int_{T\wedGe \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} \INt_\cU E^{2\rho s} |{\widehat}\psi_s(u)|^2 \pi(du,dS) + \int_{t\WeDGe \taU}^{M\wEdge \tAu}e^{2\rho s} D{\WiDEHat}m_{s} \\ 
&& \QuAd =  2 \iNt_{T\WeDge \taU}^{m\wEdge \tau}E^{2\rho s} {\widehAt}Y_S \lEft( f(s,Y^m_s,Z^m_s,\pSI^m_S) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\GamMa_s) -  \rho |{\widehaT}Y_s|^2 \Right) dS \\
&& \qQuaD + 2 \Int_{t\wEdgE \tau}^{m\Wedge \tAU}e^{2\rho s} {\Widehat}Y_s F(s,\XI_s,\eta_s,\GAmma_s)ds\\
&& \QQUaD -2 \int_{T\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \taU} E^{2\rHO s}{\widehat}Y_{s} {\widEhat}Z_s DW_S  -2\InT_{T\WedGe \tAu}^{m\wedge \taU}e^{2\Rho s} {\wIDehat}Y_{s^-} D{\WiDEHAt}M_S  - 2 \Int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\Wedge \tau}e^{2\rhO S} \inT_\cU {\widEhAt}Y_{S^-} {\WidehaT}\psi_s(U)  \tPI(du,Ds).\end{aligneD}$$ WitH the same aRgumenTS used to OBtain, thE assumPtiOns On $f$, BURkHoLdeR-DAVis-gUnDy ($p/2 \GEq 1$) aNd Young’s InEqUalitY leaD TO: $$\BEgin{AliGned}
  \NonumBer
&& \E \left( \int_{n\wEdgE \tau}^{M\WedGe \tau} E^{2\rho s} |{\WideHaT}Z_s|^2 ds \Right)^{p/2}+ \e\left(  \InT
 $$\begin{aligned}
&&  \in t_{t\wedge  \tau }^{ m\w ed ge \ tau}  e^{2\rho s} | { \wid ehat}Z_s|^2 ds +  \int _{t\w ed g e \t a u} ^{m\w edge \t a u} \ int _\ cU  e^ {2 \ rh o s}|{\ widehat }\psi_s(u) |^2  \ pi(du,ds) +\ in t_{t\wedge  \t au}^{m\wedge  \t au}e^{ 2\ rho s} d{ \wi dehat }M_{s} \\ 
&&  \quad = 2 \int_{ t \wedge\ t au }^{m \wedge \tau}e^{2\ r ho s} {\widehat}Y _s \le ft (  f ( s ,Y^ m_s ,Z^m_s,\ps i^ m_s)- f(s,\xi _ s, \ e t a_s , \gamma_s) - \rho |{\wid e hat }Y_s|^ 2\ri g ht) ds  \\
& &\ qqu ad + 2 \int _{t\ wedge \ta u}^{m\ w edge \t a u}e^{2\ rho s}  {\ wid ehat } Y_ sf(s ,\ x i_s , \e ta_ s ,\g amma_s)d s\ \&& \q quad - 2 \int _{t \wed ge \t au}^{m\wedge\ta u} e ^ {2\ rho s }{\wi deha t} Y_{s}  {\wid ehat} Z_ s dW_s  -2\int_ {t\w edge \tau }^{ m\ wed ge  \tau } e^{2\r hos}{\wideh at}Y_{s ^ -}d{ \ w i de hat}M_s  - 2 \int_ {t \ w ed ge \tau} ^{m\we d ge  \ t au}e^{2\ rh o s } \i n t _\cU{\wi d eh at}Y_{s^ -} {\w i de ha t}\psi_ s( u)  \t pi (du ,ds ).\en d {ali gned}$ $ With t he sa m e arguments us e d to obtain,t he a ss u mpti ons  on $f$, Bu rkho l der- Davi s -G und y  ($p/ 2 \ge q1 $) and Young’s inequal it y lead  to:$$\begin{alig ned}
  \no n u m ber
&& \ E \l e ft (  \int_{n\wedge  \tau }^{m\wedge \tau} e^ {2\rh o s} |{\ widehat}Z _ s |^2 ds \ rig ht) ^{p /2} + \E \left(  \int
 $$\begin{aligned}
&&_ \int_{t\wedge_\tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}_|{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds_+_ \int_{t\wedge_\tau}^{m\wedge_\tau} \int_\cU e^{2\rho_s} |{\widehat}\psi_s(u)|^2 \pi(du,ds)_+ \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho_s} d{\widehat}M_{s} \\_
&&_\quad =  2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s \left( f(s,Y^m_s,Z^m_s,\psi^m_s) -f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s) - _\rho_|{\widehat}Y_s|^2 \right)_ds_\\
&&_\qquad + 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge_\tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_s f(s,\xi_s,\eta_s,\gamma_s)ds\\
&& \qquad_-2 \int_{t\wedge_\tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}{\widehat}Y_{s} {\widehat}Z_s dW_s  -2\int_{t\wedge_\tau}^{m\wedge_\tau}e^{2\rho s} {\widehat}Y_{s^-}_d{\widehat}M_s  - 2 \int_{t\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau}e^{2\rho s} \int_\cU_{\widehat}Y_{s^-} {\widehat}\psi_s(u)  \tpi(du,ds).\end{aligned}$$ With the_same arguments used_to_obtain,_the assumptions on $f$,_Burkholder-Davis-Gundy ($p/2 \geq 1$) and Young’s_inequality lead to: $$\begin{aligned}
  \nonumber
&&_\E \left( \int_{n\wedge \tau}^{m\wedge \tau} e^{2\rho s}_|{\widehat}Z_s|^2 ds \right)^{p/2}+ \E\left(  \int