 with zero mean and variance $\alpha^2$.

Our feedback Hamiltonian is: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{5qfh}
H_F &=& \lambda_1 (XIIII) + \lambda_2 (IXIII) + \lambda_3 (IIXII) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_4 (IIIXI) + \lambda_5 (IIIIX) + \lambda_6 (YIIII) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_7 (IYIII) + \lambda_8 (IIYII) + \lambda_9 (IIIYI) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_{10} (IIIIY) + \lambda_{11} (ZIIII) + \lambda_{12} (IZIII) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_{13} (IIZII) + \lambda_{14} (IIIZI) + \lambda_{15} (IIIIZ),\end{aligned}$$ where $\lambda_i$ are the feedback couplings. With four different binary syndrome measurements, there are 16 possible outcomes. The one with all four currents positive stands for “no error”, while the other 15 possibilities correspond to single qubit $X,Y,Z$ errors. Different combinations of the measured currents determine the corresponding non-zero $\lambda_i$, as listed in the following table.

[|c|c|c|c|c|]{}

$I_m^1$ & $I_m^2$ & $I_m^3$ & $I_m^4$ & Non-zero $\lambda_i$\
+ & + & + & - & $\lambda_1$\
- & + & + & + & $\lambda_2$\
- & - & + & + & $\lambda_3$\
+ & - & - & + & $\lambda_4$\
+ & + & - & - & $\lambda_5$\
- & + & - & - & $\lambda_6$\
- & - & + & - & $\lambda_7$\
- & - & - & + & $\lambda_8$\
- & - & - & - & $\lambda_9$\
+ & - & - & - & $\lambda_{10}$\
- & + & - & + & $\lambda_{11}$\
+ &
with zero mean and variance $ \alpha^2$. 

 Our feedback Hamiltonian is: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{5qfh } 
 H_F & = & \lambda_1 (XIIII) + \lambda_2 (IXIII) + \lambda_3 (IIXII) \nonumber \\ 
  & + &   \lambda_4 (IIIXI) + \lambda_5 (IIIIX) + \lambda_6 (YIIII) \nonumber \\ 
  & + &   \lambda_7 (IYIII) + \lambda_8 (IIYII) + \lambda_9 (IIIYI) \nonumber \\ 
  & + &   \lambda_{10 } (IIIIY) + \lambda_{11 } (ZIIII) + \lambda_{12 } (IZIII) \nonumber \\ 
  & + &   \lambda_{13 } (IIZII) + \lambda_{14 } (IIIZI) + \lambda_{15 } (IIIIZ),\end{aligned}$$ where $ \lambda_i$ are the feedback couplings. With four different binary syndrome measurements, there are 16 potential result. The one with all four currents positive stand for “ no erroneousness ”, while the other 15 possibilities match to single qubit $ X, Y, Z$ errors. unlike combination of the measured stream determine the corresponding non - zero $ \lambda_i$, as list in the following table. 

 [ |c|c|c|c|c| ] { } 

 $ I_m^1 $ & $ I_m^2 $ & $ I_m^3 $ & $ I_m^4 $ & Non - zero $ \lambda_i$\ 
 + & + & + & - & $ \lambda_1$\ 
 - & + & + & + & $ \lambda_2$\ 
 - & - & + & + & $ \lambda_3$\ 
 + & - & - & + & $ \lambda_4$\ 
 + & + & - & - & $ \lambda_5$\ 
 - & + & - & - & $ \lambda_6$\ 
 - & - & + & - & $ \lambda_7$\ 
 - & - & - & + & $ \lambda_8$\ 
 - & - & - & - & $ \lambda_9$\ 
 + & - & - & - & $ \lambda_{10}$\ 
 - & + & - & + & $ \lambda_{11}$\ 
 + &
 wihh zero mean and varianct $\alpha^2$.

Our feedbaej Hamintoniah is: $$\begkn{aligned}
\label{5qfh}
H_F &=& \lambda_1 (EIIIU) + \lanbda_2 (IXIII) + \lambda_3 (IIXKI) \nonumbvr \\
 &+&  \lamvda_4 (MIIXI) + \lambda_5 (IIMJX) + \lamnba_6 (YIJLI) \nouunber \\
 &+&  \lambda_7 (IYIII) + \lakbda_8 (IIYII) + \lakbaa_9 (IIIYI) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_{10} (IIIIY) + \laibda_{11} (ZIOIL) + \lambda_{12} (IZIIY) \nomtmbed \\
 &+&  \lambda_{13} (IIZII) + \lambda_{14} (IIIZI) + \lzmbda_{15} (IPIIZ),\end{aligned}$$ whrre $\lambda_i$ are the feedbafk cluplings. With four different vinawt syndrome mdasurements, there are 16 possible outcomes. The one with all your currenjs plvitive stanvs for “no error”, whlke the other 15 possibilities cocrespond to single qubit $E,Y,Z$ errors. Different combinathous of the measured cuerwnts getesmind thd ckrceslondinh nkn-zero $\lamgda_i$, as lisred in the followinb eqble.

[|c|c|c|c|c|]{}

$I_m^1$ & $J_m^2$ & $I_m^3$ & $Y_m^4$ & Non-zero $\lambda_i$\
+ & + & + & - & $\lambda_1$\
- & + & + & + & $\lzmbda_2$\
- & - & + & + & $\lambda_3$\
+ & - & - & + & $\lambda_4$\
+ & + & - & - & $\lamhda_5$\
- & + & - & - & $\lambda_6$\
- & - & + & - & $\lambda_7$\
- & - & - & + & $\lambda_8$\
- & - & - & - & $\lambdd_9$\
+ & - & - & - & $\oaicea_{10}$\
- & + & - & + & $\lambda_{11}$\
+ &
with zero mean and variance $\alpha^2$. Our is: \label{5qfh} H_F \lambda_1 (XIIII) + \nonumber &+& \lambda_4 (IIIXI) \lambda_5 (IIIIX) + (YIIII) \nonumber \\ &+& \lambda_7 (IYIII) \lambda_8 (IIYII) + \lambda_9 (IIIYI) \nonumber \\ &+& \lambda_{10} (IIIIY) + \lambda_{11} (ZIIII) \lambda_{12} (IZIII) \nonumber \\ &+& \lambda_{13} (IIZII) + \lambda_{14} (IIIZI) + \lambda_{15} (IIIIZ),\end{aligned}$$ $\lambda_i$ the couplings. four different binary syndrome measurements, there are 16 possible outcomes. The one with all four currents stands for “no error”, while the other 15 correspond to single qubit errors. Different combinations of the currents the corresponding $\lambda_i$, listed the following table. $I_m^1$ & $I_m^2$ & $I_m^3$ & $I_m^4$ & Non-zero $\lambda_i$\ + & + & + & - $\lambda_1$\ - & + + $\lambda_2$\ & - & + & $\lambda_3$\ + & - + & $\lambda_4$\ + & + & - - & - & + & - & & $\lambda_6$\ - & - & + & & $\lambda_7$\ - & - & - & + & $\lambda_8$\ - & - & - & $\lambda_9$\ + - & - - $\lambda_{10}$\ & & - + & $\lambda_{11}$\ + &
 with zero mean and variance $\alPha^2$.

Our feedBack HAmiLtoNiAn is: $$\BegiN{aligned}
\label{5qFH}
H_F &=& \lAmbda_1 (XIIII) + \lambda_2 (IXIII) + \lAmbda_3 (iIxiI) \noNUmBer \\
 &+&  \laMbda_4 (IIIxi) + \lAMBda_5 (iIiIx) + \laMbDA_6 (YiIII) \nOnuMber \\
 &+&  \lamBda_7 (IYIII) + \laMbdA_8 (IiYII) + \lambda_9 (IIiyI) \Nonumber \\
 &+&  \laMbdA_{10} (IIIIY) + \lambda_{11} (zIIiI) + \lambDa_{12} (iZIii) \nonuMbeR \\
 &+&  \lambDa_{13} (IIZIi) + \Lambda_{14} (iIIZI) + \lambDa_{15} (iiIIZ),\enD{Aligned}$$ WHErE $\lamBda_i$ are the feedbacK CoUPlings. With four DifferEnT BiNARy sYndRome measurEmEnts, tHEre are 16 pOSsIBLE ouTComes. The one wiTh all four cuRRenTs posiTiVe sTAnds foR “no erRoR”, WhiLe the other 15 pOssiBilities cOrrespONd to sinGLe qubit $x,Y,Z$ errOrs. difFereNT cOmBinAtIOns OF tHe mEAsuRed curreNtS dEtermIne tHE CORresPonDing Non-zeRo $\lambda_i$, as liSteD in tHE foLlowiNg tabLe.

[|c|c|C|c|C|]{}

$I_m^1$ & $I_m^2$ & $i_m^3$ & $I_m^4$ & NoN-zero $\LaMbda_i$\
+ & + & + & - & $\lambda_1$\
- & + & + & + & $\lambDa_2$\
- & - & + & + & $\laMbda_3$\
+ & - & - & + & $\lambdA_4$\
+ & + & - & - & $\laMbDa_5$\
- & + & - & - & $\lAmBda_6$\
- & - & + & - & $\laMBda_7$\
- & - & - & + & $\lamBda_8$\
- & - & - & - & $\LamBda_9$\
+ & - & - & - & $\lambDa_{10}$\
- & + & - & + & $\lambdA_{11}$\
+ &
 with zero mean and varian ce $\alpha ^2$.
Ou r f ee dbac k Ha miltonian is:$ $\be gin{aligned}
\label{5q fh}
H _F &=&\ la mbda_ 1 (XIII I )+ \la mb da _2(I X II I) +\la mbda_3(IIXII) \n onu mb er \\
 &+& \ la mbda_4 (II IXI ) + \lambda_ 5 ( IIIIX)  +  \l a mbda_ 6 ( YIIII ) \non u mber \ \
 &+&  \ la m bda_7( IYIII)+ \l ambd a_8 (IIYII) + \la m bd a _9 (IIIYI) \no number  \ \ 
& + & \la mbda_{10}(I IIIY) + \lamb d a_ { 1 1 } ( Z IIII) + \lamb da_{12} (IZ I II)  \nonu mb er\ \
 &+&   \la mb d a_{ 13} (IIZII)  + \ lambda_{1 4} (II I ZI) + \ l ambda_{ 15} (I III Z), \end { al ig ned }$ $  wh e re  $\ l amb da_i$ ar eth e fee dbac k c o upli ngs . Wi th fo ur differentbin arys ynd romemeasu reme nt s, th ere ar e 16po ssible outcomes . Th e one wit h a ll  fo ur  curr e nts po sit ive  stands  for “n o  er ro r ” ,  w hile the other 15po s s ib ilitiescorres p on dt o single  q ubi t $X , Y ,Z$ e rror s .Differen t comb i na ti ons ofth e meas ur edcur rents dete rminethe corr espon d ing non-zero $ \ lambda_i$, as li s t ed in t hefollowing t able . 

[| c|c| c |c |c| ] {}

$ I_m^1 $&  $ I _m^2$ & $I_m^3$ & $ I_ m^4$ &  Non- zero $\lambda _i$\
+ & + & + & - &$\la m bd a _1$\
- & + & +  & +& $\lambda _ 2$\
- &- & +  & + & $ \lambda_3 $ \ 
+ & - &  -& +  &$\l a m bd a_4$\
+ & + & -  & -  &  $\lamb da_ 5$\
- &  +& -  &- &  $ \lambda_6 $\
- & -  &  +  &  -  &$\lam b da_7$\
-  &  -&- &  + &$ \lambd a_8$\ 
- &  -  & - &  - & $\ l am b d a_9$ \+& -& -  &  - &$\la m bda _{10}$\ 
- & + &- & + &$\ la mbda_{1 1}$\
+ &
 with_zero mean_and variance $\alpha^2$.

Our feedback_Hamiltonian is:_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{5qfh}
H_F_&=& \lambda_1_(XIIII)_+ \lambda_2 (IXIII)_+ \lambda_3 (IIXII)_\nonumber \\
 &+& _\lambda_4 (IIIXI) +_\lambda_5_(IIIIX) + \lambda_6 (YIIII) \nonumber \\
 &+&  \lambda_7 (IYIII) + \lambda_8 (IIYII) +_\lambda_9_(IIIYI) \nonumber_\\
_&+&_ \lambda_{10} (IIIIY) + \lambda_{11}_(ZIIII) + \lambda_{12} (IZIII) \nonumber_\\
 &+&_ \lambda_{13} (IIZII) + \lambda_{14} (IIIZI) + \lambda_{15}_(IIIIZ),\end{aligned}$$_where $\lambda_i$ are_the feedback couplings. With four different binary syndrome measurements,_there are 16 possible outcomes. The_one with all_four_currents_positive stands for “no_error”, while the other 15 possibilities_correspond to single qubit $X,Y,Z$ errors._Different combinations of the measured currents determine_the corresponding non-zero $\lambda_i$, as listed_in the following table.

[|c|c|c|c|c|]{}

$I_m^1$ &_$I_m^2$ &_$I_m^3$ & $I_m^4$ & Non-zero_$\lambda_i$\
+ & +_& +_& - &_$\lambda_1$\
- & + & + &_+ & $\lambda_2$\
-_& - & + & +_&_$\lambda_3$\
+ & -_&_-_& +_& $\lambda_4$\
+ &_+_& -_&_- & $\lambda_5$\
- & + &_-_& - & $\lambda_6$\
- & - &_+ & - &_$\lambda_7$\
-_& - & -_& + & $\lambda_8$\
- &_- & - & - &_$\lambda_9$\
+ &_- &_- & - & $\lambda_{10}$\
- & + & - & +_& $\lambda_{11}$\
+ &