acy\] for the forest cover and the airline delay datasets. The improvement in accuracies are reported in Table \[tab:algorithm\_accuracy\]. Ensemble methods also achieve high accuracies for these datasets, however the models they produce are not interpretable. Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] produces models that are very easily interpretable.

      Dataset         Method            Accuracy
  --- --------------- --------------- ----------
    1 Airline Delay   XGBoost              0.944
    2 Airline Delay   Random Forest        0.946
    3 Airline Delay                        0.945
    4 Forest Cover    XGBoost              0.936
    5 Forest Cover    Random Forest        0.945
    6 Forest Cover                         0.957

  : Accuracies obtained with Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\][]{data-label="tab:algorithm_accuracy"}

With the census income dataset we observed that we have a small proportion (13.58% of the data set instances) of decision tree nodes where all classifiers perform poorly. A preliminary analysis of these records indicates that there are possible data errors with this segment. For example there are records of people working with the state government working over 70 hours a week but reporting less than 50 thousand dollars in income. These records seem dubious since even at minimum wage, such employees should make over fifty thousand dollars. In any case these set of records may require further analysis to determine if they are either noisy or require additional features to obtain better classification performance.\
When these records are removed from the dataset, we obtain an accuracy of 90.04% (see Figure \[fig:EXP\_LSDT\_CI\]). Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] provides us a method to identify such problematic regions of our dataset. [@xiong2006enhancing] provides techniques to remove noise from datasets. Finding the noisy regions in large datasets and separating them from regions of good data quality is a time consuming task. Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] can help identify these regions. Noise removal techniques, such as those discussed in [@xiong2006enhancing] can then be applied to see if these can help improve classification accuracy. Therefore, there is scope for improving the accuracy with the census income dataset as well. [@kohavi1996scaling] report an accuracy of 84.47% with the
acy\ ] for the forest cover and the airline delay datasets. The improvement in accuracies are reported in Table \[tab: algorithm\_accuracy\ ]. Ensemble methods besides achieve eminent accuracies for these datasets, however the models they grow are not explainable. Algorithm \[algo: dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\ ] produces models that are very easily explainable. 

       Dataset          Method             Accuracy 
   --- --------------- --------------- ---------- 
     1 Airline Delay    XGBoost               0.944 
     2 Airline Delay    Random Forest         0.946 
     3 Airline Delay                         0.945 
     4 Forest Cover     XGBoost               0.936 
     5 Forest Cover     Random Forest         0.945 
     6 Forest Cover                          0.957 

  : accuracy obtained with Algorithm \[algo: dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\][]{data - label="tab: algorithm_accuracy " } 

 With the census income dataset we observe that we have a small symmetry (13.58% of the data set instances) of decision tree node where all classifiers perform poorly. A preliminary analysis of these records bespeak that there are possible data error with this segment. For example there are records of citizenry working with the state government working over 70 hours a workweek but reporting less than 50 thousand dollars in income. These records seem dubious since even at minimum wage, such employee should form over fifty thousand dollars. In any case these set of records may require further analysis to determine if they are either noisy or require extra feature to obtain well categorization performance.\ 
 When these criminal record are removed from the dataset, we obtain an accuracy of 90.04% (determine Figure \[fig: EXP\_LSDT\_CI\ ]). Algorithm \[algo: dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\ ] provides us a method to identify such problematic region of our dataset. [ @xiong2006enhancing ] provides techniques to remove noise from datasets. recover the noisy regions in large datasets and separating them from regions of effective data timbre is a meter consuming task. Algorithm \[algo: dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\ ] can help identify these region. Noise removal techniques, such as those discussed in [ @xiong2006enhancing ] can then be applied to see if these can help improve classification accuracy. consequently, there is scope for improving the accuracy with the census income dataset as well. [ @kohavi1996scaling ] report an accuracy of 84.47% with the
acy\] for the forest cover ana the airline dglqy datesets. Tge improxement in accuracies are replrred ib Table \[tab:algorithm\_aczuracy\]. Endemble mwthovs also achieve ijgh accmxaciea for vhese datasets, mowever the models they psoauee are not interpretable. Algorithm \[ajgo:dt\_trre\_deg\_reg\] producef mocqls fhat are very easily interpretable.

      Detaset         Kethod            Accuracy
  --- --------------- --------------- ----------
    1 Airline Delaj   XGBoost              0.944
    2 Airline Delay   Randkm Forest        0.946
    3 Airline Ddlay                        0.945
    4 Foreft Cover    WBBoost              0.936
    5 Fovest Rovee    Random Forest        0.945
    6 Forest Cjver                         0.957

  : Accoracias ocraived wmth Algorlthj \[algo:dt\_trse\_seg\_reg\][]{datq-label="tab:algorithm_avctgscy"}

With the densus igcome dataset we observed that we have d sjall proportion (13.58% of the data set instances) ov decisiog tree nodes where all classifiers perform poorly. A prxlkmiuqry avqljsis of these records indicates that there arq ppsxible data errjrs with thos srdment. For exaople tksrs are records of pfople wjrkint with tht staye government working over 70 hours a weeh but reporting lesd than 50 thobsand collats in income. These recoxds sesm dubious dince eveh at minimum wage, subh ekployees should make over sifty thonsand dollarr. In any cwse these det on records may requige futther dnalysis tl determine if they are either ipisy or requora agditionaj feabures to obtain better classiyication perfurmance.\
Wheh these records arq removed frok the dataset, we obtayn ab acxuracy uw 90.04% (see Figure \[gig:EXP\_LSDN\_CN\]). Algoritym \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_ren\] proxjdes us a methob uo identify such prublqmwtmc redhons of our gataret. [@ciong2006dnhancing] pvovkdes techniques to remova nojse from datasets. Gikding the noisy rqgions in larbe datasets and sekaratiig theo frok rggions of good data quality is z time cojsuiing task. Aldoribhm \[wlgo:dt\_tree\_xeg\_reg\] can help identify these regions. Ioise removal techniqugs, such as those discosstd in [@xiong2006eniancind] can thet be applied to see uf these can help improve classificatikn accgracy. Therefore, there is scope for improving the accuracy with the census incone datesqt as well. [@iohafi1996scaniug] xeport wn arcnracy of 84.47% with thv
acy\] for the forest cover and the datasets. improvement in are reported in achieve accuracies for these however the models produce are not interpretable. Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] models that are very easily interpretable. Dataset Method Accuracy --- --------------- --------------- ---------- Airline Delay XGBoost 0.944 2 Airline Delay Random Forest 0.946 3 Airline Delay 4 Cover 0.936 Forest Cover Random Forest 0.945 6 Forest Cover 0.957 : Accuracies obtained with Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\][]{data-label="tab:algorithm_accuracy"} With census income dataset we observed that we have small proportion (13.58% of data set instances) of decision nodes all classifiers poorly. preliminary of these records that there are possible data errors with this segment. For example there are records of people working the state over 70 a but less than 50 in income. These records seem dubious minimum wage, such employees should make over fifty dollars. In case these set of records may further analysis to determine if they are either or require additional features to obtain better classification performance.\ When these records are removed from we obtain an accuracy 90.04% (see Figure Algorithm provides a to identify problematic regions of our dataset. [@xiong2006enhancing] provides techniques to remove noise datasets. Finding the noisy regions in large datasets and separating regions good data quality a time consuming task. \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] help identify these regions. techniques, as [@xiong2006enhancing] then applied to see if can help improve classification accuracy. there is scope for census income dataset as well. [@kohavi1996scaling] report an of 84.47% with the
acy\] for the forest cover and thE airline deLay daTasEts. thE impRoveMent in accuraciES are Reported in Table \[tab:algoRithm\_AcCUracY\]. enSemblE methodS AlSO AchIeVe HigH aCCuRacieS foR these dAtasets, howEveR tHe models they PRoDuce are not IntErpretable. AlGorIthm \[alGo:Dt\_tREe\_seg\_Reg\] ProduCes modELs that Are very eaSiLY interPRetable.

      dATaSet         MEthod            Accuracy
  --- --------------- --------------- ----------
    1 AirlINe dElay   XGBoost              0.944
    2 AirLine DeLaY   raNDOm FOreSt        0.946
    3 Airline DElAy                        0.945
    4 ForESt Cover    xgBOOST              0.936
    5 FoREst Cover    RandoM Forest        0.945
    6 ForeST CoVer                         0.957

  : AccUrAciES obtaiNed wiTh aLgoRithm \[algo:dt\_Tree\_Seg\_reg\][]{datA-label="TAb:algorIThm_accuRacy"}

WiTh tHe cEnsuS InCoMe dAtASet WE oBseRVed That we haVe A sMall pRopoRTION (13.58% of tHe dAta sEt insTances) of decisIon Tree NOdeS wherE all cLassIfIers pErform PoorlY. A Preliminary analYsis Of these reCorDs IndIcAtes tHAt therE arE poSsible dAta erroRS wiTh THIS sEgment. For example thErE ARe Records oF peoplE WoRkINg with thE sTatE govERNment WorkINg Over 70 hourS a week BUt RePorting LeSs than 50 ThOusAnd DollaRS in iNcome. THese recoRds seEM dubious since eVEn at minimum waGE, sUCH eMPloyEes Should make oVer fIFty tHousANd DolLArs. In Any caSe THeSE set of records may reqUiRe furtHer anAlysis to deterMine if they ARE Either noIsy oR ReQUire additional FeatuRes to obtaiN Better clAssifIcation pErformancE.\
wHen these RecOrdS arE reMOVeD from the datasET, We obTaIn an accUraCy of 90.04% (see figUre \[Fig:eXP\_lSdT\_CI\]). AlgorIthm \[algo:Dt\_TrEe\_SeG\_reG\] provIDes us a meThOd tO iDenTify sUCh probLematIc reGiOnS Of oUr datasET. [@xIONg2006enHaNcIng] pRovIdEs tecHniqUEs tO remove Noise from DatASets. fiNdIng the nOisy regions in LaRge datasetS aNd sEparatING them froM regions of good data qualiTY is a timE coNsumiNg taSk. AlgoritHm \[aLgo:dt\_tRee\_SEg\_reg\] cAn help IdentIfY thESE regiONS. NOisE rEmoval techNIQueS, such As ThosE discusSed in [@xiong2006enhancinG] Can Then be applied To sEe if THEsE caN HeLP imPrOVe cLASsification accuRacy. TherefOrE, ThEre is scope FOr iMpRoving tHe accurAcy wiTH the cenSus income Dataset as WeLl. [@koHAVi1996sCaling] repoRt an accuRacy of 84.47% witH The
acy\] for the forest cover  and the a irlin e d ela ydata sets . The improvem e nt i n accuracies are repor ted i nT able \[ tab:a lgorith m \_ a c cur ac y\ ].En s em ble m eth ods als o achievehig haccuracies f o rthese data set s, however t hemodels  t hey produ ceare n ot int e rpreta ble. Algo ri t hm \[a l go:dt\_ t r ee \_se g\_reg\] produces mo d els that are v ery ea si l yi n ter pre table.

    Dat a set    M eth o d           Accuracy
 - -------- -- --- - --- -- ----- -- - --- -- -------- --
   1 Airl ine De l ay   XG B oost           0 .944   2 A ir l ine De lay   R andom Fo re st        0 . 9 4 6 
   3Airl ine D elay                   0 .945   4Fores t Cove r   XG Boost            0.936
   5Fo res tCover    Ran dom  Fo rest       0. 9 45 6  F orest Cover                   0. 9 57 
 : Accur ac ies  obt a i ned w ithA lg orithm \ [algo: d t\ _t ree\_se g\ _reg\] [] {da ta- label = "tab :algor ithm_acc uracy " }

With the ce n sus income da t as e t  w e  obs erv ed that wehave a sm allp ro por t ion ( 13.58 %o ft he data set instanc es ) of d ecisi on tree nodes  where all c l assifier s pe r fo r m poorly. A pr elimi nary analy s is of th ese r ecords i ndicatest h at there  ar e p oss ibl e da ta errors wit h this  s egment.  Fo r examp lethe reare  r ecords of  peoplewo rk in gwit h the state go ve rnm en t w orkin g  over70 ho ursawe e k b ut repo r ti n g  les sth an 5 0 t ho usand  dol l ars  in inc ome. Thes e r e cord sse em dubi ous since eve nat minimum  w age , such e mployees  should make over fifty thousan d d ollar s. I n any cas e t hese s eto f reco rds ma y req ui ref u rther a na lys is  to determ i n e i f the yareeithernoisy or require a d dit ional feature s t o ob t a in  be t te r  cl as s ifi c a tion performanc e.\
When t he s erecords ar e  re mo ved fro m the d atase t , we ob tain an a ccuracy o f90.0 4 %  (s ee Figure\[fig:EX P\_LSDT\_ C I\]). Al gorit hm\[algo :d t\_ tree\ _seg\_ r eg\ ] pro videsus  a met hod t oidentify  such problematic regio ns ofour d ata set. [@xi ong 2 006 enhancing ] pr ovides tec hni que s torem o ve no isef ro m d a taset s. F i nding the no isy r eg ions in lar g e dat asets  an d  separ atin g them from regio n s of good data  qua l i tyisa  tim econsuming task . A lg o r ithm \[a lg o:dt\_tree\ _seg\_re g\ ]  canhelp i dentif y these r eg i ons. N oise  re moval tec hni qu e s, such  a st hose d iscu ss ed in[@xion g 2006 e n hancing] can the n bea p plied tosee i fthese c a n he lp improve  classifica tion a ccur acy.Therefo re , ther e i sscope fori mprovingthe a ccuracy  w iththe  censu s in c o me da tase taswell. [@k o h av i 19 96 s cal ing]  repo rt  anaccuracyo f 84.47%  wi t h the
acy\] for_the forest_cover and the airline_delay datasets._The_improvement in_accuracies_are reported in_Table \[tab:algorithm\_accuracy\]. Ensemble_methods also achieve high_accuracies for these_datasets,_however the models they produce are not interpretable. Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] produces models that are_very_easily interpretable.

___   Dataset _    _ _Method       __  _Accuracy
  --- --------------- --------------- ----------
   _1 Airline Delay   XGBoost_  ___   _    0.944
 _  2 Airline Delay _ Random Forest    _   0.946
  _ 3 Airline Delay _ _    _  _ _  _     _ 0.945
 _  4 Forest Cover __ XGBoost ___ _  __ __ 0.936
    5_Forest_Cover    Random Forest _   __ 0.945
  _ 6 Forest Cover _     _ _ _          _  0.957

  : Accuracies_obtained with Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\][]{data-label="tab:algorithm_accuracy"}

With_the census_income_dataset we observed_that_we have_a small proportion (13.58% of the data_set instances)_of decision tree nodes where all_classifiers perform poorly. A_preliminary_analysis of these records indicates that_there are possible data errors with_this segment. For example there_are_records_of people working with the_state government working over 70 hours_a week but_reporting less than 50 thousand dollars in_income._These records seem dubious since even_at_minimum wage, such employees should make_over_fifty_thousand dollars. In any case_these set of records may require_further analysis to determine if they are either noisy_or require additional_features to obtain better classification_performance.\
When_these_records are removed from the dataset, we obtain an accuracy_of 90.04%_(see Figure \[fig:EXP\_LSDT\_CI\])._Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] provides us a method to identify such problematic_regions of our dataset. [@xiong2006enhancing] provides techniques_to remove noise from datasets. Finding the noisy regions in large_datasets and separating them from regions of good_data quality is a time consuming task._Algorithm \[algo:dt\_tree\_seg\_reg\] can help_identify_these regions. Noise removal techniques, such as_those_discussed_in_[@xiong2006enhancing] can then_be applied to_see if these_can help_improve classification accuracy._Therefore, there_is scope for_improving_the accuracy with the census income dataset as well. [@kohavi1996scaling] report an accuracy of 84.47% with the