)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr)}, \frac {(1-2p)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(\Delta)\bigr)}\right
 \}<(1-2p)^2,$$ and hence $\varrho=\sqrt{\rho^{(2)}}<|1-2p|$. Sharper bounds can be achieved by studying minimum of the denominator in (\[eq:secder\]).

To show that ${\mathbb Q}$ is a $g$-measure it is sufficient to show that conditional probabilities ${\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)$ converge uniformly as $n\to\infty$. Given that $$\label{eq:condprobtwo}
{\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac 1{\lambda_{J,K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(n)})\exp\left( B(w_1^{(n)})\right)}{\cosh(w_1^{(n)})},$$ and using the result of Lemma \[l:decay\]: $
w_i^n({\boldsymbol{y}}) \rightrightarrows w_i({\boldsymbol{y}})$ as $n\to\infty$, we obtain uniform convergence of conditional probabilities, and hence, ${\mathbb Q}$ is a $g$-measure with $g$ given by $$\label{eq:gfunct}
g({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\frac 1{\lambda_J}\frac{\cosh(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( B(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right)}{\cosh\left(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})\right)}.$$ Let us introduce the following functions: for ${\boldsymbol{y}}\in\{-1,1\}^{{\mathbb Z}_+}$, put $$\phi({\boldsymbol{y}}) =  B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\cosh( w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( -B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right).$$ Taking into account that $w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})=w_0(S{\boldsymbol{y}})$, one has $$g({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\frac {e^{\phi({\boldsymbol{y}})}}{\lambda_{J,K}} \frac {h({\boldsymbol{y}})}
{h(S{\boldsymbol{y}})}.$$ Since every $
) ^2 } 
  { \bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr) }, \frac { (1 - 2p)^2 } 
  { \bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(\Delta)\bigr)}\right 
  \}<(1 - 2p)^2,$$ and hence $ \varrho=\sqrt{\rho^{(2)}}<|1 - 2p|$. Sharper bounds can be achieved by study minimum of the denominator in (\[eq: secder\ ]). 

 To picture that $ { \mathbb Q}$ is a $ g$-measure it is sufficient to show that conditional probabilities $ { \mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)$ converge uniformly as $ n\to\infty$. Given that $ $ \label{eq: condprobtwo } 
 { \mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac 1{\lambda_{J, K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(n)})\exp\left (B(w_1^{(n)})\right)}{\cosh(w_1^{(n)})},$$ and use the result of Lemma \[l: decay\ ]: $ 
 w_i^n({\boldsymbol{y } }) \rightrightarrows w_i({\boldsymbol{y}})$ as $ n\to\infty$, we obtain undifferentiated overlap of conditional probabilities, and hence, $ { \mathbb Q}$ is a $ g$-measure with $ g$ given by $ $ \label{eq: gfunct } 
 g({\boldsymbol{y } }) = \frac 1{\lambda_J}\frac{\cosh(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left (B(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right)}{\cosh\left(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})\right)}.$$ Let us introduce the keep up functions: for $ { \boldsymbol{y}}\in\{-1,1\}^{{\mathbb Z}_+}$, invest $ $ \phi({\boldsymbol{y } }) =   B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\boldsymbol{y } }) = \cosh (w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left (-B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right).$$ lead into account that $ w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})=w_0(S{\boldsymbol{y}})$, one has $ $ g({\boldsymbol{y } }) = \frac { e^{\phi({\boldsymbol{y}})}}{\lambda_{J, K } } \frac { h({\boldsymbol{y } }) } 
 { h(S{\boldsymbol{y}})}.$$ Since every $
)^2}
 {\bihl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr)}, \frxc {(1-2p)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosi(\Delta)\bjgr)}\right
 \}<(1-2p)^2,$$ and hence $\varrho=\sqrt{\rho^{(2)}}<|1-2p|$. Dhqrper bounds can be achievea by studjing mininum id the denominator lu (\[eq:ssgder\]).

Tm show that ${\matmbb Q}$ is a $c$-measure it is sjfyicient to show that conditional profabilitoed ${\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)$ sonvtrgq unjformly as $n\to\infty$. Given that $$\labsl{eq:convprobtwo}
{\mathbb A}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac 1{\lambda_{J,K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(j)})\exp\peft( B(w_1^{(n)})\right)}{\cosh(w_1^{(j)})},$$ and using the eesult of Leoma \[l:decay\]: $
w_i^n({\boldsymbkl{y}}) \rightrightarrows w_i({\boldsymbul{y}})$ ax $n\to\infty$, ww ohjain uniform convvrgence of cokcitiondl probsbilities, and mence, ${\marhbb Q}$ is a $g$-measure xith $g$ given by $$\labej{eq:gfunct}
c({\bkldsymbol{y}}) =\frac 1{\lqmvda_J}\ftac{\covh(w_0({\buodshmbkl{b}}))\exl\left( H(w_1({\bkldsymbol{y}}))\dight)}{\cosh\ledt(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})\right)}.$$ Lqn us introducs the sojlowing functions: for ${\boldsymbol{y}}\in\{-1,1\}^{{\mathtb A}_+}$, put $$\phi({\boldsymbol{y}}) =  V(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\bopdsymbol{y}}) =\cosh( w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( -B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right).$$ Takitg invo aceiunt gyah $w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})=w_0(S{\boldsymbol{y}})$, one has $$g({\boldsymbjm{y}}) =\fgac {e^{\phi({\boldsymboj{y}})}}{\lambda_{J,K}} \grwc {r({\boldsymbol{y}})}
{h(R{\boldsvjbkl{y}})}.$$ Since every $
)^2} {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr)}, \frac {(1-2p)^2} {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(\Delta)\bigr)}\right \}<(1-2p)^2,$$ and Sharper can be by studying minimum To that ${\mathbb Q}$ a $g$-measure it sufficient to show that conditional probabilities Q}(y_0|y_1^n)$ converge uniformly as $n\to\infty$. Given that $$\label{eq:condprobtwo} {\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac 1{\lambda_{J,K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(n)})\exp\left( B(w_1^{(n)})\right)}{\cosh(w_1^{(n)})},$$ and the result of Lemma \[l:decay\]: $ w_i^n({\boldsymbol{y}}) \rightrightarrows w_i({\boldsymbol{y}})$ as $n\to\infty$, we obtain convergence conditional and ${\mathbb Q}$ is a $g$-measure with $g$ given by $$\label{eq:gfunct} g({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\frac 1{\lambda_J}\frac{\cosh(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( B(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right)}{\cosh\left(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})\right)}.$$ Let us the following functions: for ${\boldsymbol{y}}\in\{-1,1\}^{{\mathbb Z}_+}$, put $$\phi({\boldsymbol{y}}) B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\cosh( w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( Taking into account that $w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})=w_0(S{\boldsymbol{y}})$, has =\frac {e^{\phi({\boldsymbol{y}})}}{\lambda_{J,K}} {h({\boldsymbol{y}})} Since $
)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr)}, \frAc {(1-2p)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpHa+(1-\alpHa)\cOsh(\deLta)\bIgr)}\rIght
 \}<(1-2p)^2,$$ and hence $\vARrho=\Sqrt{\rho^{(2)}}<|1-2p|$. Sharper bounds cAn be aChIEved BY sTudyiNg minimUM oF THe dEnOmInaToR In (\[Eq:secDer\]).

to show tHat ${\mathbb Q}$ Is a $G$-mEasure it is suFFiCient to shoW thAt conditionaL prObabilItIes ${\MAthbb q}(y_0|y_1^N)$ convErge unIFormly As $n\to\inftY$. GIVen thaT $$\Label{eq:CONdProbTwo}
{\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac 1{\LAmBDa_{J,K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(n)})\Exp\lefT( B(W_1^{(N)})\rIGHt)}{\cOsh(W_1^{(n)})},$$ and using ThE resuLT of LemmA \[L:dECAY\]: $
w_i^N({\Boldsymbol{y}}) \riGhtrightarrOWs w_I({\boldsYmBol{Y}})$ As $n\to\iNfty$, wE oBTaiN uniform conVergEnce of conDitionAL probabILities, aNd hencE, ${\maThbB Q}$ is A $G$-mEaSurE wITh $g$ GIvEn bY $$\LabEl{eq:gfunCt}
G({\bOldsyMbol{Y}}) =\FRAC 1{\lamBda_j}\fraC{\cosh(W_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\eXp\lEft( B(W_1({\BolDsymbOl{y}}))\riGht)}{\cOsH\left(W_1({\boldsYmbol{Y}})\rIght)}.$$ Let us introdUce tHe followiNg fUnCtiOnS: for ${\bOLdsymbOl{y}}\In\{-1,1\}^{{\mAthbb Z}_+}$, pUt $$\phi({\boLDsyMbOL{Y}}) =  b(w_0({\Boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\boLdSYMbOl{y}}) =\cosh( w_0({\BoldsyMBoL{y}}))\EXp\left( -B(w_0({\BoLdsYmboL{Y}}))\Right).$$ takiNG iNto accouNt that $W_1({\BoLdSymbol{y}})=W_0(S{\BoldsyMbOl{y}})$, One Has $$g({\bOLdsyMbol{y}}) =\fRac {e^{\phi({\bOldsyMBol{y}})}}{\lambda_{J,K}} \frAC {h({\boldsymbol{y}})}
{H(s{\bOLDsYMbol{Y}})}.$$ SiNce every $
)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\al pha)\cosh( K)\bi gr) },\f rac{(1- 2p)^2}
 {\bigl ( \alp ha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(\De lta)\ bi g r)}\ r ig ht
 \ }<(1-2p ) ^2 , $ $ a nd  h enc e$ \v arrho =\s qrt{\rh o^{(2)}}<| 1-2 p| $. Sharper b o un ds can beach ieved by stu dyi ng min im umo f the  de nomin ator i n  (\[eq :secder\] ). 
To sh o w that$ { \m athb b Q}$ is a $g$-me a su r e it is suffic ient t os ho w tha t c onditional  p robab i lities$ {\ m a t hbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n) $ convergeu nif ormlyas  $n \ to\inf ty$.Gi v enthat $$\lab el{e q:condpro btwo}{ \mathbb Q}(y_0| y_1^n) =\f rac  1{\ l am bd a_{ J, K }}\ f ra c{\ c osh (w_0^{(n )} )\ exp\l eft( B ( w _1^{ (n) })\r ight) }{\cosh(w_1^{ (n) })}, $ $ a nd us ing t he r es ult o f Lemm a \[l :d ecay\]: $
w_i^n ({\b oldsymbol {y} })  \r ig htrig h tarrow s w _i( {\bolds ymbol{y } })$  a s $ n\ to\infty$, we obta in u ni form con vergen c eof conditio na l p roba b i litie s, a n dhence, $ {\math b bQ} $ is a$g $-meas ur e w ith  $g$g iven  by $$ \label{e q:gfu n ct}
g({\boldsy m bol{y}}) =\fr a c1 { \l a mbda _J} \frac{\cosh (w_0 ( {\bo ldsy m bo l{y } }))\e xp\le ft (  B ( w_1({\boldsymbol{y} }) )\righ t)}{\ cosh\left(w_1 ({\boldsym b o l {y}})\ri ght) } .$ $  Let us introd uce t he followi n g functi ons:for ${\b oldsymbol { y }}\in\{- 1,1 \}^ {{\ mat h b bZ}_+}$, put $ $ \ phi( {\ boldsym bol {y}}) =   B (w_ 0({ \bo ld symbol{y} })),\qua dh( {\ bo lds ymbol { y}}) =\c os h(w_ 0({ \bold s ymbol{ y}})) \exp \l ef t ( - B(w_0({ \ bo l d symb ol {y }})) \ri gh t).$$  Tak i nginto ac count tha t $ w _1({ \b ol dsymbol {y}})=w_0(S{\ bo ldsymbol{y }} )$,  one h a s  $$g({\b oldsymbol{y}}) =\frac { e ^{\phi( {\b oldsy mbol {y}})}}{\ lam bda_{J ,K} }  \frac  {h({\ bolds ym bol { y }})}{ h (S {\b ol dsymbol{y} } ) }.$ $ Sin ce  eve ry $
)^2}
 {\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(K)\bigr)},_\frac {(1-2p)^2}
_{\bigl(\alpha+(1-\alpha)\cosh(\Delta)\bigr)}\right
 \}<(1-2p)^2,$$ and hence_$\varrho=\sqrt{\rho^{(2)}}<|1-2p|$. Sharper_bounds_can be_achieved_by studying minimum_of the denominator_in (\[eq:secder\]).

To show that_${\mathbb Q}$ is_a_$g$-measure it is sufficient to show that conditional probabilities ${\mathbb Q}(y_0|y_1^n)$ converge uniformly as_$n\to\infty$._Given that_$$\label{eq:condprobtwo}
{\mathbb_Q}(y_0|y_1^n)=\frac_1{\lambda_{J,K}}\frac{\cosh(w_0^{(n)})\exp\left( B(w_1^{(n)})\right)}{\cosh(w_1^{(n)})},$$ and using the_result of Lemma \[l:decay\]: $
w_i^n({\boldsymbol{y}})_\rightrightarrows w_i({\boldsymbol{y}})$_as $n\to\infty$, we obtain uniform convergence of conditional_probabilities,_and hence, ${\mathbb_Q}$ is a $g$-measure with $g$ given by $$\label{eq:gfunct}
g({\boldsymbol{y}})_=\frac 1{\lambda_J}\frac{\cosh(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( B(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right)}{\cosh\left(w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})\right)}.$$ Let us introduce_the following functions:_for_${\boldsymbol{y}}\in\{-1,1\}^{{\mathbb_Z}_+}$, put $$\phi({\boldsymbol{y}}) =_ B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}})),\quad h({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\cosh( w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\exp\left( -B(w_0({\boldsymbol{y}}))\right).$$_Taking into account that $w_1({\boldsymbol{y}})=w_0(S{\boldsymbol{y}})$, one_has $$g({\boldsymbol{y}}) =\frac {e^{\phi({\boldsymbol{y}})}}{\lambda_{J,K}} \frac {h({\boldsymbol{y}})}
{h(S{\boldsymbol{y}})}.$$ Since_every $