 of next-generation surveys. For clarity, some of the technical material is separately given in an appendix. Throughout the paper, we adopt the standard notation, and all redshifts are expressed in the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using the dipole from ref. [@Fixsen1996].

Methodology {#section2}
===========

Variation of observed galaxy luminosities {#section2a}
-----------------------------------------

In an inhomogeneous universe, the observed redshift $z$ of an object (a galaxy) is generally different from its cosmological redshift $z_{c}$ defined for the unperturbed background. To linear order in perturbation theory, one finds the well-known expression [@SW] $$\begin{split}
\frac{z-z_{c}}{1+z} &= \frac{V(t,r)}{c} - \frac{\Phi(t,r)}{c^2}\\
&{ } - \frac{2}{c^2}\int_{t(r)}^{t_0}\dd t \frac{\partial\Phi\left\lbrack\hvr r(t),t\right\rbrack}{\partial t}\approx \frac{V(t,r)}{c},
\end{split}
\label{eq:sw}$$ where $V$ is the physical radial peculiar velocity of of the object, $\Phi$ denotes the gravitational potential and $\hvr$ is a unit vector along the line of sight to the object. The last step explicitly assumes low redshifts where the velocity $V$ makes the dominant contribution.[^1] Note that all fields are considered relative to their present-day values at a comoving radius of $r(t=t_{0})$ and that we have substituted $z$ for $z_{c}$ in the denominator on the left-hand side of eq., which simplifies part of the analysis presented below and is consistent at the linear level.

The observed absolute magnitude $M$, computed using the galaxy redshift $z$, rather than the (unknown) cosmological redshift $z_{c}$, differs from the true value $M^{(t)}$ because of the shift ${\rm DM}(z)-{\rm DM}(z_c)$ in the distance modulus ${\rm DM}=25+5\log_{\rm 10}\lbrack D_{L}/{\rm Mpc}\rbrack$, where $D_{L}$ is the luminosity distance. Hence, $$\begin{split}
M &= m - {\rm DM}(
of next - generation surveys. For clarity, some of the technical fabric is individually feed in an appendix. Throughout the paper, we dramatize the standard note, and all redshifts are expressed in the rest skeleton of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using the dipole from referee. [ @Fixsen1996 ]. 

 Methodology { # section2 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Variation of ascertained galaxy luminosities { # section2a } 
 ----------------------------------------- 

 In an inhomogeneous population, the observed redshift $ z$ of an aim (a galaxy) is generally different from its cosmological redshift $ z_{c}$ defined for the unperturbed setting. To linear order in perturbation theory, one determine the well - known expression [ @SW ] $ $ \begin{split } 
 \frac{z - z_{c}}{1+z } & = \frac{V(t, r)}{c } - \frac{\Phi(t, r)}{c^2}\\ 
 & { } - \frac{2}{c^2}\int_{t(r)}^{t_0}\dd t \frac{\partial\Phi\left\lbrack\hvr r(t),t\right\rbrack}{\partial t}\approx \frac{V(t, r)}{c }, 
 \end{split } 
 \label{eq: sw}$$ where $ V$ is the physical radial curious velocity of of the object, $ \Phi$ denotes the gravitational potential and $ \hvr$ is a unit vector along the cable of sight to the object. The last step explicitly assumes broken red shift where the velocity $ V$ makes the dominant contribution.[^1 ] Note that all fields are considered relative to their present - sidereal day values at a comoving spoke of $ r(t = t_{0})$ and that we have substituted $ z$ for $ z_{c}$ in the denominator on the left - bridge player side of eq. , which simplifies part of the analysis give below and is consistent at the linear level. 

 The watch absolute magnitude $ M$, computed using the galaxy redshift $ z$, rather than the (obscure) cosmological redshift $ z_{c}$, differs from the true value $ M^{(t)}$ because of the switch $ { \rm DM}(z)-{\rm DM}(z_c)$ in the distance modulus $ { \rm DM}=25 + 5\log_{\rm 10}\lbrack D_{L}/{\rm Mpc}\rbrack$, where $ D_{L}$ is the luminosity distance. therefore, $ $ \begin{split } 
 M & = m - { \rm DM } (
 of next-generation surveys. Nor clarity, some of the technjcal matdrial is separately given in ab apptudix. Throughout the oaper, we wdopt thw stendard notation, ehd all vzdshirbs arz xxpressed in thg rest frame of the cosmic mkcxowave background (CMB) using the dipoje from rff. [@Fixsen1996].

Methoqolobr {#sedniin2}
===========

Variation of observed galaxg luminmsities {#sectipn2a}
-----------------------------------------

In an inhomogeneous unigersf, the observed reddhift $z$ of qn ofhect (a galaxh) is generally differeht from its cosmological redshiwt $z_{c}$ defined fir thf unperturbev backdround. To likvar ordar in prrturbation thcory, mne finds the well-known xxpression [@SW] $$\begin{sklit}
\frac{z-z_{w}}{1+z} &= \frac{V(t,r)}{c} - \frac{\Pyi(r,r)}{c^2}\\
&{ } - \fraw{2}{c^2}\ing_{r(r)}^{t_0}\ad u \fcac{\lartiap\Phm\left\lbrack\gvr r(t),t\righr\rbrack}{\partial t}\apptov \frac{V(t,r)}{c},
\end{sllit}
\lafej{eq:sw}$$ where $V$ is the physical radial pebulizr velocity of of the ovject, $\Phi$ denotes the gravitatyonal potential and $\hvr$ is a unit vector along tha linx uf winht gi hhe object. The last step explicitly assumes ljs tecshifts where bhe velocity $V$ makrs tng dominant conjribution.[^1] Hote that all fielfs are sonsieered relwtivr to their present-day valuew at a comovpng eadius of $r(t=t_{0})$ and chat we have subxtituyed $z$ for $z_{c}$ in the denuminztor on the left-hand ride of eq., which sikpnifies part of the analysif presentxd bekow and is vonsiseent at thf lincdr level.

The observfd abdonute magnihude $M$, computed using the galaxb redshift $z$, tatver than thz (unknpwn) cosmologisal redshift $z_{e}$, differf froo the true value $K^{(t)}$ because jf the shift ${\sl DM}(z)-{\rm DM}(z_c)$ in the qistqnce modulur ${\rm DM}=25+5\log_{\rm 10}\lbtack D_{L}/{\rm Mpc}\rbrack$, where $D_{L}$ is the lmminorjty distance. Heuee, $$\begin{split}
M &= m - {\ro DI}(
of next-generation surveys. For clarity, some of material separately given an appendix. Throughout standard and all redshifts expressed in the frame of the cosmic microwave background using the dipole from ref. [@Fixsen1996]. Methodology {#section2} =========== Variation of observed galaxy {#section2a} ----------------------------------------- In an inhomogeneous universe, the observed redshift $z$ of an object galaxy) generally from cosmological redshift $z_{c}$ defined for the unperturbed background. To linear order in perturbation theory, one finds well-known expression [@SW] $$\begin{split} \frac{z-z_{c}}{1+z} &= \frac{V(t,r)}{c} - &{ } - \frac{2}{c^2}\int_{t(r)}^{t_0}\dd \frac{\partial\Phi\left\lbrack\hvr r(t),t\right\rbrack}{\partial t}\approx \frac{V(t,r)}{c}, \end{split} where is the radial velocity of the object, denotes the gravitational potential and $\hvr$ is a unit vector along the line of sight to the The last assumes low where velocity makes the dominant that all fields are considered relative values at a comoving radius of $r(t=t_{0})$ and we have $z$ for $z_{c}$ in the denominator the left-hand side of eq., which simplifies part the analysis presented below and is consistent at the linear level. The observed absolute magnitude using the galaxy redshift rather than the cosmological $z_{c}$, from true value because of the shift ${\rm DM}(z)-{\rm DM}(z_c)$ in the distance modulus DM}=25+5\log_{\rm 10}\lbrack D_{L}/{\rm Mpc}\rbrack$, where $D_{L}$ is the luminosity distance. M m - {\rm
 of next-generation surveys. FoR clarity, soMe of tHe tEchNiCal mAterIal is separatelY GiveN in an appendix. ThroughouT the pApER, we aDOpT the sTandard NOtATIon, AnD aLl rEdSHiFts arE exPressed In the rest fRamE oF the cosmic miCRoWave backgrOunD (CMB) using the DipOle froM rEf. [@FIXsen1996].

MEthOdoloGy {#sectIOn2}
===========

VariAtion of obSeRVed galAXy luminOSItIes {#sEction2a}
-----------------------------------------

In an inhomoGEnEOus universe, the ObservEd REdSHIft $Z$ of An object (a gAlAxy) is GEnerallY DiFFERenT From its cosmolOgical redshIFt $z_{C}$ definEd For THe unpeRturbEd BAckGround. To linEar oRder in perTurbatIOn theorY, One findS the weLl-kNowN expREsSiOn [@Sw] $$\bEGin{SPlIt}
\fRAc{z-Z_{c}}{1+z} &= \frac{V(T,r)}{C} - \fRac{\PhI(t,r)}{c^2}\\
&{ } - \FRAC{2}{C^2}\int_{T(r)}^{t_0}\Dd t \fRac{\paRtial\Phi\left\lBraCk\hvR R(t),t\Right\RbracK}{\parTiAl t}\apProx \frAc{V(t,r)}{C},
\eNd{split}
\label{eq:sW}$$ wheRe $V$ is the pHysIcAl rAdIal peCUliar vEloCitY of of thE object, $\pHi$ dEnOTES tHe gravitational potEnTIAl And $\hvr$ is A unit vECtOr ALong the lInE of SighT TO the oBjecT. thE last steP expliCItLy Assumes LoW redshIfTs wHerE the vELociTy $V$ makEs the domInant COntribution.[^1] NotE That all fields ARe CONsIDereD reLative to theIr prESent-Day vALuEs aT A comoVing rAdIUs OF $r(t=t_{0})$ and that we have suBsTituteD $z$ for $Z_{c}$ in the denomiNator on the LEFT-hand sidE of eQ., WhICh simplifies paRt of tHe analysis PResented Below And is conSistent at THE linear lEveL.

ThE obSerVED aBsolute magnitUDE $M$, coMpUted usiNg tHe galaxY reDshIft $Z$, raThEr than the (Unknown) cOsMoLoGiCal RedshIFt $z_{c}$, diffErS frOm The True vALue $M^{(t)}$ bEcausE of tHe ShIFt ${\rM DM}(z)-{\rm Dm}(Z_c)$ IN The dIsTaNce mOduLuS ${\rm DM}=25+5\Log_{\rM 10}\LbrAck D_{L}/{\rm mpc}\rbrack$, WheRE $D_{L}$ iS tHe LuminosIty distance. HeNcE, $$\begin{spliT}
M &= M - {\rm dM}(
 of next-generation survey s. For cla rity,  so meof  the  tec hnical materia l  isseparately given in an  appe nd i x. T h ro ughou t the p a pe r ,  we  a do ptth e  s tanda rdnotatio n, and all  re ds hifts are ex p re ssed in th e r est frame of  th e cosm ic  mi c rowav e b ackgr ound ( C MB) us ing the d ip o le fro m  ref. [ @ F ix sen1 996].

Methodolog y  { # section2}
==== ====== =Va r i ati onof observe dgalax y  lumino s it i e s  {# s ection2a}
--- ----------- - --- ------ -- --- - ------ ----- 
I n a n inhomogen eous  universe , theo bserved redshif t $z$ofanobje c t(a  ga la x y)i sgen e ral ly diffe re nt  from  its c o s molo gic al r edshi ft $z_{c}$ de fin ed f o r t he un pertu rbed  b ackgr ound.To li ne ar order in per turb ation the ory ,one  f indst he wel l-k now n expre ssion [ @ SW]  $ $ \ b eg in{split}
\frac{z- z_ { c }} {1+z} &=  \frac { V( t, r )}{c} -\f rac {\Ph i ( t,r)} {c^2 } \\ 
&{ } -\frac{ 2 }{ c^ 2}\int_ {t (r)}^{ t_ 0}\ ddt \fr a c{\p artial \Phi\lef t\lbr a ck\hvr r(t),t\ r ight\rbrack}{ \ pa r t ia l  t}\ app rox \frac{V (t,r ) }{c} ,
\e n d{ spl i t}
\l abel{ eq : sw } $$ where $V$ is the  p hysica l rad ial peculiarvelocity o f o f the ob ject ,  $ \ Phi$ denotes t he gr avitationa l  potenti al an d $\hvr$  is a uni t vector a lon g t helin e of  sight to the o bjec t.  The la ststep ex pli cit lyass um es low re dshiftswh er eth e v eloci t y $V$ ma ke s t he  do minan t  contr ibuti on.[ ^1 ]N ote  that a l lf i elds  a re  con sid er ed re lati v e t o their  present- day valu es  a t a com oving radiusof  $r(t=t_{0 }) $ a nd tha t we havesubstituted $z$ for $z_ { c}$ inthe  deno mina tor on th e l eft-ha nds ide of  eq.,which  s imp l i fiesp a rt  of  t he analysi s pre sente dbelo w and i s consistent at th e  li near level.
The  obs e r ve d a b so l ute  m a gni t u de $M$, compute d using th eg al axy redshi f t $ z$ , rathe r thanthe ( u nknown)  cosmolog ical reds hi ft $ z _ {c} $, differs  from th e true va l ue $M ^ {( t)}$bec ause o fthe  shif t ${\r m  DM }(z)- {\rm D M} (z_c)$  in t he  distanc e modulus ${\rm DM}=25+ 5\log_ {\rm10} \lbrack D _{L } /{\ rm Mpc}\r brac k$, where$D_ {L} $ isthe lumin osit y  d ist a nce.Henc e , $$\begi n {s pli t } 
M  &= m - {\r m D M}( 
 of_next-generation surveys._For clarity, some of_the technical_material_is separately_given_in an appendix._Throughout the paper,_we adopt the standard_notation, and all_redshifts_are expressed in the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using the_dipole_from ref._[@Fixsen1996].

Methodology_{#section2}
===========

Variation_of observed galaxy luminosities {#section2a}
-----------------------------------------

In_an inhomogeneous universe, the observed_redshift $z$_of an object (a galaxy) is generally different_from_its cosmological redshift_$z_{c}$ defined for the unperturbed background. To linear order_in perturbation theory, one finds the_well-known expression [@SW]_$$\begin{split}
\frac{z-z_{c}}{1+z}_&=_\frac{V(t,r)}{c} - \frac{\Phi(t,r)}{c^2}\\
&{ }_- \frac{2}{c^2}\int_{t(r)}^{t_0}\dd t \frac{\partial\Phi\left\lbrack\hvr r(t),t\right\rbrack}{\partial t}\approx_\frac{V(t,r)}{c},
\end{split}
\label{eq:sw}$$ where $V$ is the physical_radial peculiar velocity of of the object,_$\Phi$ denotes the gravitational potential and_$\hvr$ is a unit vector_along the_line of sight to the_object. The last_step explicitly_assumes low redshifts_where the velocity $V$ makes the_dominant contribution.[^1] Note_that all fields are considered relative_to_their present-day values_at_a_comoving radius_of $r(t=t_{0})$ and_that_we have_substituted_$z$ for $z_{c}$ in the denominator_on_the left-hand side of eq., which simplifies_part of the analysis_presented_below and is consistent_at the linear level.

The observed_absolute magnitude $M$, computed using the_galaxy redshift_$z$, rather_than the (unknown) cosmological redshift $z_{c}$, differs from the true value_$M^{(t)}$ because of the shift ${\rm_DM}(z)-{\rm DM}(z_c)$ in the_distance modulus_${\rm_DM}=25+5\log_{\rm 10}\lbrack D_{L}/{\rm_Mpc}\rbrack$,_where $D_{L}$_is the luminosity distance. Hence, $$\begin{split}
M &=_m -_{\rm DM}(