ontube95b; @sarloos88]. The front starts at the laser spot where the surface tension is largest, and ‘propagates’ outward toward the anchoring globule simply because the amplitude of the instability grows at different rates along the tube. Our results predict a speed of front propagation which is inversely proportional to the length of the tube, and is largest near the laser spot, decreasing to zero somewhere near the anchoring reservoirs; and a characteristic wavenumber which also decreases (much slower, see Fig. \[fig:dispersion2\] below) away from the laser spot.

The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section 2 we derive the linear concentration gradient in the absence of surface undulations. We predict a ‘ramped’, or spatially-varying control parameter, the effective surface tension, which is in fact the two-dimensional pressure whose gradient drives the flow of lipid against the viscous drag of the bulk fluid. In Section 3 we present a detailed microscopic picture of the uptake of surfactant by the trap, and argue that a competition between bending and compression energies modifies the effective surface tension of the trap. This leads to a prediction of a critical laser power for the onset of an instability. While this section may safely be omitted in reading this paper, it illuminates the nature of the instability by treating a realistic scenario for how the trap buckles to initiate flow.

In Section 4 we discuss the implications of a slowly varying surface tension on the detailed calculation of Goldstein, [*et al.*]{} [@nelsontube95a; @nelsontube95b]. We also discuss front propagation within the picture of a surface tension gradient, which relates the problem to a large body of work on front propagation with ‘ramped’ parameters [@kramer82]. The issue of front propagation in this system is delicate [@nelsontube95b], and our results suggest at least two possibilities, which we briefly raise in this work and pose for further investigation. Depending on whether noise ([*i.e.*]{} existing thermal fluctuations in the tubule) is present, we expect front propagation which is either (a) characteristic of that predicted by the so-called Marginal Stability Criteria (MSC) [@nelsontube95b; @kramer82], or (b) dominated by amplification of existing ‘noise’, which can lead to behavior reminiscent of front propagation for a steep enough ramp. We conclude in Section 5 by recalling the relevant timescales and frequencies, and
ontube95b; @sarloos88 ]. The front starts at the laser spot where the surface latent hostility is bombastic, and ‘ propagates ’ outward toward the anchoring globule simply because the amplitude of the imbalance grows at unlike rates along the tube. Our resultant role bode a speed of front propagation which is inversely proportional to the length of the tube, and is largest near the laser position, decreasing to zero somewhere near the anchoring reservoirs; and a characteristic wavenumber which besides decreases (much slower, see Fig.   \[fig: dispersion2\ ] below) away from the laser spot. 

 The outline of this composition is as follows. In Section   2 we derive the analogue concentration gradient in the absence of surface wave. We predict a ‘ ramped ’, or spatially - change control parameter, the effective surface tension, which is in fact the two - dimensional pressure whose gradient drive the flow of lipid against the viscous drag of the bulk fluid. In Section   3 we present a detailed microscopic video of the consumption of surfactant by the trap, and argue that a competition between bending and compression energies modifies the effective open latent hostility of the ambush. This leads to a prediction of a critical laser exponent for the attack of an instability. While this section may safely be omitted in reading this paper, it illuminates the nature of the instability by treating a naturalistic scenario for how the trap buckles to initiate flow. 

 In Section   4 we discuss the implications of a slowly varying surface tension on the detailed calculation of Goldstein, [ * et al. * ] { } [ @nelsontube95a; @nelsontube95b ]. We also discourse front propagation within the word picture of a surface tension gradient, which relates the problem to a large soundbox of work on front propagation with ‘ ramped ’ argument [ @kramer82 ]. The issue of front propagation in this system is delicate [ @nelsontube95b ], and our resultant role suggest at least two possibility, which we briefly raise in this employment and pose for further probe. Depending on whether noise ([ * i.e. * ] { } existing thermal fluctuations in the tubule) is present, we have a bun in the oven front propagation which is either (a) characteristic of that predicted by the so - called Marginal Stability Criteria (MSC) [ @nelsontube95b; @kramer82 ], or (bacillus) dominated by amplification of exist ‘ noise ’, which can lead to behavior reminiscent of front propagation for a exorbitant enough ramp. We conclude in part   5 by recalling the relevant timescales and frequencies, and
ontkbe95b; @sarloos88]. The front suarts at the laset wpot wiere ths surfacd tension is largest, and ‘pro'agares’ oytward toward the anchuring glohule simply uecause the amplmfude of the ihdtabnlmty grows at dinferent ratas along the tgbd. Lur results predict a speed of frone propabahion which is ynvegsqly lgokortional to the length of the tuge, and ps largest near tne laser spot, decreasing tl zego somewhere near hhe anchoribg rqwervoirs; and a characttrnstic wavenomber which also decreases (much rlowex, see Fig. \[fit:duspftsion2\] below) eway fgom the laser spot.

The outlinr of this papev is es fillows. In Section 2 we verive the linear cogcentratimn gradient in the qbwence of vurfxxe jndhletikns. We prxdict a ‘ramled’, or spatually-varying controk [qrameter, the sffectyvq surface tension, which is in fact the uwo-dijensional pressure whosw gradient drives the flow of jipid against the viscous drag of the bulk fluid. Hn Sertkon 3 wc prdwejt a detailed microscopic picture of the uptahs pf surfactant by the trap, amd atdue that a coopetitnkn between bending ajd comptessiob energief mocifies the effective surfacw tension of rhe trap. This leadd to a prednction of a critical laser power fur tge onset of an instagklity. While this sebtiot may safely be omitted in reading vhis 'aper, it illominatef the natuge of the instability by treajing a realistic scenario for how the trap buckles to initiatg fnow.

Pn Sectiou 4 we dlscuss the implycations of a xlowly raryine surface nension oi the detailqd calculatiot of Goldsteii, [*et al.*]{} [@nqlsobtubw95a; @nelsuvtube95b]. We also discuss yxont propqgation within the pizfure of a surfaet ttnwion gradient, ehizh wepaves tra problem to a lxrgd body of work on wrony propagation with ‘rdmpes’ parameters [@kramet82]. Bhe issue of frone propagation in this system is delirate [@nxlsontibe95f], and our results suggest at lsast two oosfibilities, wrich we briefly xaise in this work and pose for further mnvestigation. Depending on whether noise ([*i.g.*]{} ewisting therkal fjuctuatiots in the tubule) is present, we expect front propagation whjch is eithfr (a) characteristic of that predicted by the so-called Marginal Stability Xriterma (MSC) [@nelsonfube95n; @krakex82], ox (b) domynatxd by amplificatiom of existing ‘noise’, which can lxad to behdvnor reminiscent of front propsgxtion for a sjeep enough ramp. We concluse in Sevtion 5 by recalling the relevant timescales and frequencles, and
ontube95b; @sarloos88]. The front starts at the where surface tension largest, and ‘propagates’ simply the amplitude of instability grows at rates along the tube. Our results a speed of front propagation which is inversely proportional to the length of tube, and is largest near the laser spot, decreasing to zero somewhere near anchoring and characteristic which also decreases (much slower, see Fig. \[fig:dispersion2\] below) away from the laser spot. The outline this paper is as follows. In Section 2 derive the linear concentration in the absence of surface We a ‘ramped’, spatially-varying parameter, effective surface tension, is in fact the two-dimensional pressure whose gradient drives the flow of lipid against the viscous drag the bulk Section 3 present detailed picture of the surfactant by the trap, and argue between bending and compression energies modifies the effective tension of trap. This leads to a prediction a critical laser power for the onset of instability. While this section may safely be omitted in reading this paper, it illuminates the the instability by treating realistic scenario for the buckles initiate In Section we discuss the implications of a slowly varying surface tension on detailed calculation of Goldstein, [*et al.*]{} [@nelsontube95a; @nelsontube95b]. We also propagation the picture of surface tension gradient, which the to a large body on propagation [@kramer82]. issue front propagation in this is delicate [@nelsontube95b], and our suggest at least two in this work and pose for further investigation. on whether noise ([*i.e.*]{} existing thermal fluctuations the tubule) is present, we expect front propagation which is either (a) of that the so-called Marginal Stability Criteria (MSC) [@nelsontube95b; @kramer82], (b) dominated by amplification existing ‘noise’, which can lead to behavior reminiscent of propagation a steep ramp. We conclude Section 5 by the relevant timescales and
ontube95b; @sarloos88]. The front staRts at the laSer spOt wHerE tHe suRfacE tension is largESt, anD ‘propagates’ outward towaRd the AnCHoriNG gLobulE simply BEcAUSe tHe AmPliTuDE oF the iNstAbility Grows at difFerEnT rates along tHE tUbe. Our resuLts Predict a speeD of Front pRoPagATion wHicH is inVerselY ProporTional to tHe LEngth oF The tube, AND iS larGest near the laser sPOt, DEcreasing to zerO somewHeRE nEAR thE anChoring resErVoirs; ANd a charACtERIStiC Wavenumber whiCh also decreASes (Much slOwEr, sEE Fig. \[fiG:dispErSIon2\] Below) away frOm thE laser spoT.

The ouTLine of tHIs paper Is as foLloWs. IN SecTIoN 2 wE deRiVE thE LiNeaR ConCentratiOn GrAdienT in tHE ABSencE of SurfAce unDulations. We prEdiCt a ‘rAMpeD’, or spAtialLy-vaRyIng coNtrol pArameTeR, the effective suRfacE tension, wHicH iS in FaCt the TWo-dimeNsiOnaL pressuRe whose GRadIeNT DRiVes the flow of lipid aGaINSt The viscoUs drag OF tHe BUlk fluid. in secTion 3 WE PreseNt a dETaIled micrOscopiC PiCtUre of thE uPtake oF sUrfActAnt by THe trAp, and aRgue that A compETition between bENding and comprESsION eNErgiEs mOdifies the eFfecTIve sUrfaCE tEnsIOn of tHe traP. THIs LEads to a prediction of A cRiticaL laseR power for the oNset of an inSTABility. WhIle tHIs SEction may safelY be omItted in reaDIng this pAper, iT illuminAtes the naTURe of the iNstAbiLitY by TREaTing a realistiC SCenaRiO for how The Trap bucKleS to IniTiaTe Flow.

In SecTion 4 we diScUsS tHe ImpLicatIOns of a slOwLy vArYinG surfACe tensIon on The dEtAiLEd cAlculatIOn OF goldStEiN, [*et aL.*]{} [@neLsOntubE95a; @neLSonTube95b]. We Also discuSs fROnt pRoPaGation wIthin the pictuRe Of a surface TeNsiOn gradIENt, which rElates the problem to a largE Body of wOrk On froNt prOpagation WitH ‘rampeD’ paRAmeterS [@krameR82]. The iSsUe oF FRont pROPaGatIoN in this sysTEM is DelicAtE [@nelSontube95B], and our results suggESt aT least two possIbiLitiES, WhIch WE bRIefLy RAisE IN this work and posE for furtheR iNVeStigation. DEPenDiNg on wheTher noiSe ([*i.e.*]{} eXIsting tHermal fluCtuations In The tUBUle) Is present, wE expect fRont propaGAtion WHiCh is eIthEr (a) chaRaCteRistiC of thaT PreDicteD by the So-Called margiNaL StabiliTy Criteria (MSC) [@nelsontube95B; @krameR82], or (b) dOmiNated by amPliFIcaTion of exiStinG ‘noise’, whicH caN leAd to bEhaVIor reMiniSCeNt oF Front PropAGation for A StEep ENOuGh ramp. We conCLUDe iN SectIon 5 BY recalLing The relevant timescALes and frequencIes, aND
ontube95b; @sarloos88]. Th e front st artsatthe  l aser  spo t where the su r face  tension is largest, a nd ‘p ro p agat e s’  outw ard tow a rd t hean ch ori ng gl obule  si mply be cause theamp li tude of thei ns tability g row s at differe ntratesal ong the t ube . Our  resul t s pred ict a spe ed of fro n t propa g a ti on w hich is inversely pr o portional to t he len gt h  o f the  tu be, and is  l arges t  near t h el a s ers pot, decreasi ng to zeros ome wherene art he anc horin gr ese rvoirs; and  a c haracteri stic w a venumbe r  whichalso d ecr eas es ( m uc hslo we r , s e eFig .  \[ fig:disp er si on2\]  bel o w ) away  fr om t he la ser spot.

Th e o utli n e o f thi s pap er i sas fo llows.  In S ec tion 2 we deriv e th e linearcon ce ntr at ion g r adient  in  th e absen ce of s u rfa ce u n du lations. We predic ta ‘r amped’,or spa t ia ll y -varying  c ont rolp a ramet er,t he  effecti ve sur f ac etension ,whichis  in  fa ct th e  two -dimen sional p ressu r e whose gradie n t drives thef lo w of lipi d a gainst thevisc o us d rago fthe bulkfluid .I nS ection 3 we present  a  detai led m icroscopic pi cture of t h e uptake o f su r fa c tant by the tr ap, a nd argue t h at a com petit ion betw een bendi n g  and com pre ssi onene r g ie s modifies th e effe ct ive sur fac e tensi onofthe  tr ap . This le ads to a  p re di ct ion  of a critical  l ase rpow er fo r  the o nsetof a nin s tab ility.W hi l e  thi sse ctio n m ay  safe ly b e  om itted i n reading  th i s pa pe r,  it ill uminates thena ture of th eins tabili t y  by trea ting a realistic scenar i o for h owthe t rapbuckles t o i nitiat e f l ow.

I n Sect ion 4  w e d i s cusst h eimp li cations of a  sl owlyva ryin g surfa ce tension on thed eta iled calculat ion  ofG o ld ste i n, [*e ta l.* ] { } [@nelsontube9 5a; @nelso nt u be 95b]. We a l sodi scuss f ront pr opaga t ion wit hin the p icture of  a  sur f a cetension gr adient,which rel a tes t h eprobl emto a l ar gebodyof wor k  on  fron t prop ag ationwith‘r amped’ p arameters [@kramer82].The is sue o f f ront prop aga t ion  in thissyst em is deli cat e [ @nels ont u be95b ], a n dour resul ts s u ggest atl ea stt w opossibiliti e s ,  wh ich w e b r ieflyrais e in this work an d  pose for furt heri n ves tig a tion .Depending on w het he r noise ([ *i .e.*]{} exi sting th er m al fl uctuat ions i n the t u b ul e ) is p rese nt,  we expec t f ro n t propa ga ti o n whic h is  e ither(a) ch a ract e r istic of that pr edict e d  by t h e s o-cal le d Margi n al S tability C riteria (MS C) [@n elso ntube 95b; @k ra mer82] , o r(b) domina t ed by amp lific ation o fexis tin g ‘noi se’, w hichcanle adto behavi o r  r e mi ni s cen t of  fron tprop agation f o r a stee p e n ough ra mp . W e conclu d ei n  Section 5  by  reca l l ing the re l evan t  t i mesca les an d freq uencies ,  an d
ontube95b; @sarloos88]._The front_starts at the laser_spot where_the_surface tension_is_largest, and ‘propagates’_outward toward the_anchoring globule simply because_the amplitude of_the_instability grows at different rates along the tube. Our results predict a speed of_front_propagation which_is_inversely_proportional to the length of_the tube, and is largest_near the_laser spot, decreasing to zero somewhere near the_anchoring_reservoirs; and a_characteristic wavenumber which also decreases (much slower, see Fig. \[fig:dispersion2\]_below) away from the laser spot.

The_outline of this_paper_is_as follows. In Section 2_we derive the linear concentration gradient_in the absence of surface undulations._We predict a ‘ramped’, or spatially-varying control_parameter, the effective surface tension, which_is in fact the two-dimensional_pressure whose_gradient drives the flow of_lipid against the_viscous drag_of the bulk_fluid. In Section 3 we present a_detailed microscopic picture_of the uptake of surfactant by_the_trap, and argue_that_a_competition between_bending and compression_energies_modifies the_effective_surface tension of the trap. This_leads_to a prediction of a critical laser_power for the onset_of_an instability. While this_section may safely be omitted_in reading this paper, it illuminates_the nature_of the_instability by treating a realistic scenario for how the trap buckles_to initiate flow.

In Section 4 we discuss_the implications of a_slowly varying_surface_tension on the_detailed_calculation of_Goldstein, [*et al.*]{} [@nelsontube95a; @nelsontube95b]. We also_discuss front_propagation within the picture of a_surface tension gradient, which_relates_the problem to a large body_of work on front propagation with_‘ramped’ parameters [@kramer82]. The issue_of_front_propagation in this system is_delicate [@nelsontube95b], and our results suggest_at least two_possibilities, which we briefly raise in this_work_and pose for further investigation. Depending_on_whether noise ([*i.e.*]{} existing thermal fluctuations_in_the_tubule) is present, we expect_front propagation which is either (a)_characteristic of that predicted by the so-called Marginal Stability_Criteria (MSC) [@nelsontube95b;_@kramer82], or (b) dominated by_amplification_of_existing ‘noise’, which can lead to behavior reminiscent of front_propagation for_a steep enough_ramp. We conclude in Section 5 by recalling the relevant timescales_and frequencies, and