 k}}{{\bf k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frac{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}'}}
{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}}}\cdot\frac{V_{{{\bf k}}'}}{V_{{\bf k}}}\right]n_{{{\bf k}}'} = 1 \,, 
\label{system_ni_Wubk}$$ where we also changed the notation $V_i$ into $V_{{\bf k}}$ and $V_j$ into $V_{{{\bf k}}'}$. Now we observe directly that while Eqs. (\[EqforwWubk\]) contain only intensive parameters (i.e. which do not depend on the volumes $V_{{\bf k}}$ involved), the values of the equilibrium particle populations (\[system\_ni\_Wubk\]) depend on our arbitrary choice of volumes, so the thermodynamic quantities, which are the populations $n_{{\bf k}}$, are not well defined.

Correction of the parameters
============================

The reason for which the thermodynamics of FES systems is ambiguous is obvious from the beginning. If we look for example at Eq. (\[system\_Wu\]) and we imagine that we reduce the dimension of one of the spaces, say of space $i$, by half, than since all the parameters $\beta_{ij}$ are proportional to $G_j/G_i$, this could cause a significant resistribution of all the occupation numbers (as we proved in concrete cases above). Since the population numbers should be intensive parameters, it means that the system could not have thermodynamic limit.

Fortunately, as it was easy to observe the anomaly of FES, it is as easy to correct it. I shall prove below that if the “trouble-making” mutual exclusion statistics parameters are proportional to the space on which they act, i.e. $\alpha_{ij}\propto G_i$, then the system admits a thermodynamic limit. In Ref. [@submitted.FESinteraction] I analized the exclusion statistics that appears in general interacting systems and I showed that in the limit of a quasi-continuous density of states the mutual exclusion statistics parameters indeed satisfy this property. To differentiate these new parameters from the ones used above, I shall denote them by $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$. Therefore, the qualitatively new feature of the parameters $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$ is that for ${{\bf k}}\ne{{\bf k}}'$, $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf
k}}{{\bf k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frac{\sigma_{{{\bf k } }' } } 
 { \sigma_{{{\bf k}}}}\cdot\frac{V_{{{\bf k}}'}}{V_{{\bf k}}}\right]n_{{{\bf k } }' } = 1 \, , 
 \label{system_ni_Wubk}$$ where we also changed the notation $ V_i$ into $ V_{{\bf k}}$ and $ V_j$ into $ V_{{{\bf k}}'}$. Now we note immediately that while Eqs. (\[EqforwWubk\ ]) contain only intensive argument (i.e. which do not count on the volumes $ V_{{\bf k}}$ involved), the values of the chemical equilibrium particle populations (\[system\_ni\_Wubk\ ]) count on our arbitrary option of volumes, so the thermodynamic quantities, which are the population $ n_{{\bf k}}$, are not well defined. 

 Correction of the parameters 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The reason for which the thermodynamics of fez systems is ambiguous is obvious from the beginning. If we look for example at Eq. (\[system\_Wu\ ]) and we imagine that we shrink the dimension of one of the spaces, say of quad $ i$, by half, than since all the parameters $ \beta_{ij}$ are proportional to $ G_j / G_i$, this could cause a meaning resistribution of all the occupation numbers (as we prove in concrete cases above). Since the population numbers should be intensive parameters, it mean that the system could not have thermodynamic limit. 

 Fortunately, as it was easy to observe the anomaly of FES, it is as easy to correct it. I shall prove below that if the “ trouble - making ” mutual exclusion statistics parameters are proportional to the space on which they act, i.e. $ \alpha_{ij}\propto G_i$, then the arrangement admits a thermodynamic limit. In Ref. [ @submitted. FESinteraction ] I analized the ejection statistics that appears in general interacting systems and I indicate that in the limit of a quasi - continuous density of states the mutual ejection statistics parameters indeed satisfy this property. To differentiate these new parameter from the ones used above, I shall denote them by $ \tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$. Therefore, the qualitatively newfangled feature of the parameter $ \tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$ is that for $ { { \bf k}}\ne{{\bf k}}'$, $ \tilde\alpha_{{{\bf
 k}}{{\bv k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frag{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}'}}
{\sigma_{{{\by k}}}}\cdot\hrac{V_{{{\bf k}}'}}{V_{{\bf k}}}\rkght]n_{{{\bf k}}'} = 1 \,, 
\label{system_ni_Wuuk}$$ wyere qe also changed the nogation $V_i$ into $V_{{\bd k}}$ end $V_j$ into $V_{{{\bf k}}'}$. Now we obserbc dirzcvly that while Gqs. (\[EqforwWutk\]) contain onlf kncensive parameters (i.e. which do not dqpend om hhe volumes $V_{{\bs k}}$ pndolvsd), the values of the equilibrium pzrticle populations (\[xystem\_ni\_Wubk\]) depend on our arbltrary choice of vllumes, so tye trwrmodynamic duantities, which are tge populations $n_{{\bf k}}$, are not weul deyined.

Correcjnin lx the paramxters
============================

Tre reason fov which the thrrmodynamics on FES sywtems is ambiguous is obvious from the feginning. Iy we look for example ar Eq. (\[vystam\_Wu\]) qnd we ikafine tjat we reduce the dimensuon of one of the skacqw, say of spacs $i$, by hwlf, than since all the parameters $\beta_{ib}$ ade proportional to $G_j/G_i$, this could cause a slgnificane resistribution of all the occupation numbers (as we pcoxed ik covxrfte cases above). Since the population numbers fgoilc be intensive parameters, ih kgans that the rystem cohld not have thermldynamis limut.

Fortunauely, ss it was easy to observe tye anomaly oy FWS, it is as easy tl correct ic. I shsll ptove below that if the “croubls-making” mutkal excluakon statistics pxrakeders are proportional to tre space in wkich theh acj, i.e. $\al[ha_{ij}\proptl G_i$, bven the system admlts a tvermodynamlc limit. In Ref. [@submitted.FESintxcaction] I anakised the excjusiok statistics thwt appears in yeneral nnterazting systvms and I showed thae in the limid of a quasi-cmntinuouf debsitt of stxges the mutual exclusiou staristics parameters inased satisfy thiw ptiperty. To diffrrevtiwtv tiese gaw parameterv frum gne onds used aboye, K shsll denote them by $\thlde\zlpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$. Therrfjre, the wualitatyvely new feayure of the parameuers $\tmlde\al'ha_{{{\bf l}}{{\bf k}}'}$ is that for ${{\bf k}}\ne{{\bf k}}'$, $\tilds\alpha_{{{\bf
k}}{{\bf k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frac{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}'}} {\sigma_{{{\bf k}}}\right]n_{{{\bf = 1 \label{system_ni_Wubk}$$ where we into k}}$ and $V_j$ $V_{{{\bf k}}'}$. Now observe directly that while Eqs. (\[EqforwWubk\]) only intensive parameters (i.e. which do not depend on the volumes $V_{{\bf k}}$ the values of the equilibrium particle populations (\[system\_ni\_Wubk\]) depend on our arbitrary choice volumes, the quantities, are the populations $n_{{\bf k}}$, are not well defined. Correction of the parameters ============================ The reason which the thermodynamics of FES systems is ambiguous obvious from the beginning. we look for example at (\[system\_Wu\]) we imagine we the of one of spaces, say of space $i$, by half, than since all the parameters $\beta_{ij}$ are proportional to $G_j/G_i$, could cause resistribution of the numbers we proved in above). Since the population numbers should it means that the system could not have limit. Fortunately, it was easy to observe the of FES, it is as easy to correct I shall prove below that if the “trouble-making” mutual exclusion statistics parameters are proportional to on which they act, $\alpha_{ij}\propto G_i$, then system a limit. Ref. [@submitted.FESinteraction] analized the exclusion statistics that appears in general interacting systems and showed that in the limit of a quasi-continuous density of mutual statistics parameters indeed this property. To differentiate new from the ones used shall them k}}'}$. the new feature of the $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$ is that ${{\bf k}}\ne{{\bf k}}'$, $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf
 k}}{{\bf k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frac{\siGma_{{{\bf k}}'}}
{\sigmA_{{{\bf k}}}}\cDot\FraC{V_{{{\Bf k}}'}}{V_{{\Bf k}}}\rIght]n_{{{\bf k}}'} = 1 \,, 
\label{sYStem_Ni_Wubk}$$ where we also changEd the NoTAtioN $v_i$ Into $V_{{\Bf k}}$ and $V_J$ InTO $v_{{{\bf K}}'}$. NOw We oBsERvE direCtlY that whIle Eqs. (\[EqfoRwWUbK\]) contain only INtEnsive paraMetErs (i.e. which do Not Depend On The VOlumeS $V_{{\bF k}}$ invOlved), tHE valueS of the equIlIBrium pARticle pOPUlAtioNs (\[system\_ni\_Wubk\]) depENd ON our arbitrary cHoice oF vOLuMES, so The ThermodynaMiC quanTIties, whICh ARE The POpulations $n_{{\bf K}}$, are not well DEfiNed.

CorReCtiON of the ParamEtERs
============================

THe reason for WhicH the thermOdynamICs of FES SYstems iS ambigUouS is ObviOUs FrOm tHe BEgiNNiNg. IF We lOok for exAmPlE at Eq. (\[SystEM\_wU\]) And wE imAginE that We reduce the diMenSion OF onE of thE spacEs, saY oF spacE $i$, by haLf, thaN sInce all the paramEterS $\beta_{ij}$ arE prOpOrtIoNal to $g_J/G_i$, thiS coUld Cause a sIgnificANt rEsISTRiBution of all the occuPaTIOn Numbers (aS we proVEd In COncrete cAsEs aBove). sINce thE popULaTion numbErs shoULd Be IntensiVe ParameTeRs, iT meAns thAT the System Could not Have tHErmodynamic limIT.

Fortunately, aS It WAS eASy to ObsErve the anomAly oF fES, iT is aS EaSy tO CorreCt it. I ShALl PRove below that if the “tRoUble-maKing” mUtual exclusioN statisticS PARameters Are pROpORtional to the spAce on Which they aCT, i.e. $\alpha_{Ij}\proPto G_i$, theN the systeM ADmits a thErmOdyNamIc lIMIt. in Ref. [@submitteD.feSinTeRaction] i anAlized tHe eXclUsiOn sTaTistics thAt appearS iN gEnErAl iNteraCTing systEmS anD I ShoWed thAT in the Limit Of a qUaSi-COntInuous dENsITY of sTaTeS the MutUaL exclUsioN StaTistics ParameterS inDEed sAtIsFy this pRoperty. To diffErEntiate theSe New ParameTERs from thE ones used above, I shall denOTe them bY $\tiLde\alPha_{{{\bF k}}{{\bf k}}'}$. TherEfoRe, the qUalITativeLy new fEaturE oF thE PArameTERs $\TilDe\Alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf K}}'}$ IS thAt for ${{\Bf K}}\ne{{\bF k}}'$, $\tilde\Alpha_{{{\bf
 k}}{{\bf k}}'}w_{{{\bf k} }'}+\alpha _{{{\ bfk}} {{ \bfk}}' }\frac{\sigma_ { {{\b f k}}'}}
{\sigma_{{{\b f k}} }} \ cdot \ fr ac{V_ {{{\bfk }} ' } }{V _{ {\ bfk} } }\ right ]n_ {{{\bfk}}'} = 1\,,  \label{syste m _n i_Wubk}$$whe re we also c han ged th enot a tion$V_ i$ in to $V_ { {\bf k }}$ and $ V_ j $ into $V_{{{\ b f  k }}'} $. Now we observe di r ectly that whi le Eqs .( \[ E q for wWu bk\]) cont ai n onl y  intens i ve p a ram e ters (i.e. wh ich do notd epe nd onth e v o lumes$V_{{ \b f  k} }$ involved ), t he values  of th e  equili b rium pa rticle  po pul atio n s(\ [sy st e m\_ n i\ _Wu b k\] ) depend  o nour a rbit r a r y  cho ice  ofvolum es, so the th erm odyn a mic  quan titie s, w hi ch ar e thepopul at ions $n_{{\bf k }}$,  are notwel ldef in ed.
C orrect ion  of  the pa rameter s 
== == = = = == ================== =T he  reasonfor wh i ch  t h e thermo dy nam icso f  FESsyst e ms  is ambi guousi sob vious f ro m thebe gin nin g. If we l ook fo r exampl e atE q. (\[system\_ W u\]) and we i m ag i n et hatwereduce thedime n sion  ofo ne  of the s paces ,s ay of space $i$, by ha lf , than  sinc e all the par ameters $\ b e t a_{ij}$arep ro p ortional to $G _j/G_ i$, this c o uld caus e a s ignifica nt resist r i bution o f a llthe  oc c u pa tion numbers( a s we  p roved i n c oncrete  ca ses  ab ove ).  Since th e popula ti on  n um ber s sho u ld be in te nsi ve  pa ramet e rs, it  mean s th at  t h e s ystem c o ul d notha ve  the rmo dy namic  lim i t.
Fortun ately, as  it wasea sy  to obs erve the anom al y of FES,it  is  as ea s y  to corr ect it. I shall prove b e low tha t i f the  “tr ouble-mak ing ” mutu ale xclusi on sta tisti cs  pa r a meter s ar e p ro portionalt o  th e spa ce  onwhich t hey act, i.e. $\al p ha_ {ij}\propto G _i$ , th e n  t hes ys t emad m its a  thermodynamiclimit. InRe f .[@submitte d .FE Si nteract ion] Ianali z ed theexclusion  statisti cs  tha t app ears in ge neral in teracting syste m sand I  sh owed t ha t i n the  limit ofa qua si-con ti nuousdensi ty  of stat es the mutual exclusion  stati stics  pa rametersind e edsatisfy t hisproperty.Todif feren tia t e the se n e wpar a meter s fr o m the one s  u sed a bo ve, I shall d e not e the m b y  $\til de\a lpha_{{{\bf k}}{{ \ bf k}}'}$. The refo r e , t heq uali ta tively new fea tur eo f  the par am eters $\til de\alpha _{ { {\bfk}}{{\ bf k}} '}$ ist h at for ${ {\bf  k} }\ne{{\bf  k} }' $ , $\til de \a l pha_{{ {\bf 
 k}}{{\bf_k}}'}w_{{{\bf k}}'}+\alpha_{{{\bf_k}}{{\bf k}}'}\frac{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}'}}
{\sigma_{{{\bf k}}}}\cdot\frac{V_{{{\bf_k}}'}}{V_{{\bf k}}}\right]n_{{{\bf_k}}'}_= 1_\,,_
\label{system_ni_Wubk}$$ where we_also changed the_notation $V_i$ into $V_{{\bf_k}}$ and $V_j$_into_$V_{{{\bf k}}'}$. Now we observe directly that while Eqs. (\[EqforwWubk\]) contain only intensive parameters_(i.e._which do_not_depend_on the volumes $V_{{\bf k}}$_involved), the values of the_equilibrium particle_populations (\[system\_ni\_Wubk\]) depend on our arbitrary choice of_volumes,_so the thermodynamic_quantities, which are the populations $n_{{\bf k}}$, are not_well defined.

Correction of the parameters
============================

The reason_for which the_thermodynamics_of_FES systems is ambiguous_is obvious from the beginning. If_we look for example at Eq._(\[system\_Wu\]) and we imagine that we reduce_the dimension of one of the_spaces, say of space $i$,_by half,_than since all the parameters_$\beta_{ij}$ are proportional_to $G_j/G_i$,_this could cause_a significant resistribution of all the_occupation numbers (as_we proved in concrete cases above)._Since_the population numbers_should_be_intensive parameters,_it means that_the_system could_not_have thermodynamic limit.

Fortunately, as it was_easy_to observe the anomaly of FES, it_is as easy to_correct_it. I shall prove_below that if the “trouble-making”_mutual exclusion statistics parameters are proportional_to the_space on_which they act, i.e. $\alpha_{ij}\propto G_i$, then the system admits a_thermodynamic limit. In Ref. [@submitted.FESinteraction] I_analized the exclusion statistics_that appears_in_general interacting systems_and_I showed_that in the limit of a quasi-continuous_density of_states the mutual exclusion statistics parameters_indeed satisfy this property._To_differentiate these new parameters from the_ones used above, I shall denote_them by $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$._Therefore,_the_qualitatively new feature of the_parameters $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf k}}{{\bf k}}'}$ is that_for ${{\bf k}}\ne{{\bf_k}}'$, $\tilde\alpha_{{{\bf