 the redshift of accretion and orbital trajectory (including mass loss) of each dSph in our sample, we could perform the profile matching in a more exacting way, but this is not practical with present data due to the uncertainties in the orbits of the MW satellites [@lake10dwarforbits]. Therefore, we have added both the effects in quadrature to the cosmic variance error band in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] in order to derive a limiting scatter estimate shown as the outer light gray regions in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\].

Thus, the shaded bands about the average relations in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] can be thought of as a limiting theoretical scatter about the relation. In principle, if the data at a particular scale scatter about the relation with a larger variance than indicated by the shaded band, then this would be indicative of intrinsic scatter in the $M_{\rm vir} - L$ relationship. This then implies that the secondary scalings in galaxy formation (e.g. 2-D scalings such as the fundamental plane) can be fit to the data set to provide useful information. Conversely, if the scatter (including observational errors) is consistent with the theoretical scatter, the secondary scaling relations cannot be measured at that scale.

The possibility of detectable intrinsic scatter is is particularly interesting at the faint end, where it has been noted that despite the wide ranges of luminosities, the MW dSphs appear to have similar halo masses, albeit with large scatter [@stri08nat; @wolf09] – this could be due to scatter (observational or intrinsic) masking a weak relation, scatter in halo mass about a new scale in galaxy formation, selection effects (e.g. the stealth galaxies’ influence as discussed in §\[sec:halomatch\]), or some as yet unknown effect. This scale appears particularly strongly in \[fig:mlscatter\_altmodel\] due to the preferential fitting on the dSph. These data also admit a steepening power law instead of a true scale at the low-mass regime as suggested by @krav09drev to match the dSph luminosity function, so we plot this relation in Figure \[fig:abundmatch\].

We note in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] that there is a systematic offset for the bright dSphs. This is primarily due to the tension between fitting the RM relation for the dE and the bright dSphs with a single power law, as is used for
the redshift of accretion and orbital trajectory (including mass loss) of each dSph in our sample distribution, we could do the visibility matching in a more exacting way, but this is not virtual with present data due to the uncertainties in the orbit of the MW satellite [ @lake10dwarforbits ]. Therefore, we have added both the effects in quadrature to the cosmic variance erroneousness band in Figure \[fig: mlscatter\ ] in order to deduce a limiting scatter estimate shown as the outer light gray regions in Figure \[fig: mlscatter\ ]. 

 therefore, the shaded bands about the average relations in Figure \[fig: mlscatter\ ] can be think of as a limiting theoretical scatter about the relation. In rationale, if the data at a finical scale scatter about the relative with a larger variance than indicated by the shaded dance band, then this would be indicative of intrinsic scatter in the $ M_{\rm vir } - L$ relationship. This then implies that the secondary scalings in galaxy constitution (e.g. 2 - D scalings such as the fundamental plane) can be fit to the data set to provide useful information. Conversely, if the scatter (include observational errors) is coherent with the theoretical scatter, the junior-grade scaling relative cannot be measured at that scale. 

 The possibility of detectable intrinsic scatter is is particularly interesting at the faint end, where it has been noted that despite the broad ranges of luminosities, the MW dSphs appear to have similar halo batch, albeit with large scatter [ @stri08nat; @wolf09 ] – this could be due to scatter (observational or intrinsic) masking a weak relation, scatter in halo mass about a fresh scale in galaxy formation, selection effects (for example the stealth galaxies ’ influence as discussed in § \[sec: halomatch\ ]), or some as yet unknown effect. This scale appears particularly strongly in \[fig: mlscatter\_altmodel\ ] due to the discriminatory fitting on the dSph. These data also admit a steepening ability law alternatively of a true plate at the low - mass government as suggested by @krav09drev to match the dSph luminosity routine, so we plat this relation in Figure \[fig: abundmatch\ ]. 

 We note in Figure \[fig: mlscatter\ ] that there is a systematic offset for the bright dSphs. This is primarily due to the tension between fitting the RM sexual intercourse for the dE and the bright dSphs with a single ability law, as is used for
 thf redshift of accretion xnd orbital tralwctory (inclusing masr loss) of each dSph in our semplw, we xould perform the profkle matchpng in a nore wxacting weg, but tmns is kot pxartical with prexent data gue to the uncargannties in the orbits of the MW sateljites [@lskf10dwarforbits]. Treregjre, sv mave added both the effects in qhadratuge to the cosmic fariance error band in Figkre \[vig:mlscatter\] in orfer to derice a oimiting scagter estimate shown as the outer light gray regions iv Figbre \[fig:mlscqtrer\].

Hvus, the shaved bagds about thc averace relayions in Figurc \[fig:klsxatter\] can be thought of as a limiting jheoretican acatter about the rwlatimn. It prkbciole, ih tge datw av a particumar scale sxatter about the rekaeppn with a ladger vwryance than indicated by the shaded band, thsn this would be indicarive of intrinsic scajter in thq $M_{\rm vir} - L$ relationship. This then implies that dhe sxcundcvn scxoijgs in galaxy formation (e.g. 2-D scalings such as fht flndamental plane) gan be fit to the caha fet to providg useful ihformation. Conversfly, if jhe scqtter (incjudimg observational errors) is xonsistent wpth rhe theoretical scctter, the seeondari scalong relations cannot be meaaured at thwt scale.

Tgd possibility of denectdble intrinsic scatter is ys particnlarlv interertinb at tre faint ejd, whcse it has been notfd thct devpite the aide ranges of luminosities, the MW dSphs appesr to have siiilar halo masses, wlbeit with latge scattzr [@strk08nat; @wolf09] – this cmuld be due to scatter (otdervational mr intrigsic) masjing a ddak relation, svatter in halo mass about a new scale in falaxy formatiou, welection effecys (d.g. ehv svealtr galaxies’ inxluevce ss dircussed in §\[wdc:hakomatch\]), or some as yat uhknown effect. This sgale appeqrs partycularly stromgly in \[fig:mlscatttr\_altmmdeu\] due to the preferential fitting on tge dSph. Tjesc data also aqmit a steepeniny power law instead of a true scale at tie low-mass regime as soggested by @krav09drev jo katch the dXph ltminosity function, so we plot this relation in Figure \[fig:abundmatch\].

Se nota in Vigure \[fig:mlscatter\] that there is a systematic offset for the bright dSphw. This is primarilg dur to nhe cension betxexn fitting the RM relation for the dE and the brmght dSphs wnth a single power law, as is isdd for
the redshift of accretion and orbital trajectory loss) each dSph our sample, we in more exacting way, this is not with present data due to the in the orbits of the MW satellites [@lake10dwarforbits]. Therefore, we have added both effects in quadrature to the cosmic variance error band in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] in to a scatter shown as the outer light gray regions in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\]. Thus, the shaded bands about the relations in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] can be thought of a limiting theoretical scatter the relation. In principle, if data a particular scatter the with a larger than indicated by the shaded band, then this would be indicative of intrinsic scatter in the $M_{\rm - L$ then implies the scalings galaxy formation (e.g. such as the fundamental plane) can the data set to provide useful information. Conversely, the scatter observational errors) is consistent with the scatter, the secondary scaling relations cannot be measured that scale. The possibility of detectable intrinsic scatter is is particularly interesting at the faint it has been noted despite the wide of the dSphs to have halo masses, albeit with large scatter [@stri08nat; @wolf09] – this could due to scatter (observational or intrinsic) masking a weak relation, halo about a new in galaxy formation, selection (e.g. stealth galaxies’ influence as §\[sec:halomatch\]), some effect. scale particularly strongly in \[fig:mlscatter\_altmodel\] to the preferential fitting on dSph. These data also instead of a true scale at the low-mass as suggested by @krav09drev to match the luminosity function, so we plot this relation in Figure \[fig:abundmatch\]. We note Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] is a systematic offset for the bright dSphs. is primarily due to tension between fitting the RM relation for the dE the dSphs with single power law, is used for
 the redshift of accretion and Orbital traJectoRy (iNclUdIng mAss lOss) of each dSph iN Our sAmple, we could perform the ProfiLe MAtchINg In a moRe exactINg WAY, buT tHiS is NoT PrActicAl wIth presEnt data due To tHe UncertaintieS In The orbits oF thE MW satelliteS [@laKe10dwarFoRbiTS]. TherEfoRe, we hAve addED both tHe effects In QUadratURe to the COSmIc vaRiance error band in fIgURe \[fig:mlscatter\] In ordeR tO DeRIVe a LimIting scattEr EstimATe shown AS tHE OUteR Light gray regiOns in Figure \[FIg:mLscattEr\].

thuS, The shaDed baNdS AboUt the averagE relAtions in FIgure \[fIG:mlscatTEr\] can be ThoughT of As a LimiTInG tHeoReTIcaL ScAttER abOut the reLaTiOn. In pRincIPLE, If thE daTa at A partIcular scale scAttEr abOUt tHe relAtion With A lArger VarianCe thaN iNdicated by the shAded Band, then tHis WoUld Be IndicATive of IntRinSic scatTer in thE $m_{\rm ViR} - l$ RElAtionship. This then iMpLIEs That the sEcondaRY sCaLIngs in gaLaXy fOrmaTIOn (e.g. 2-D ScalINgS such as tHe fundAMeNtAl plane) CaN be fit To The DatA set tO ProvIde useFul inforMatioN. conversely, if thE Scatter (includINg OBSeRVatiOnaL errors) is coNsisTEnt wIth tHE tHeoREticaL scatTeR, ThE Secondary scaling relAtIons caNnot bE measured at thAt scale.

The POSSibility Of deTEcTAble intrinsic sCatteR is is partiCUlarly inTeresTing at thE faint end, WHEre it has BeeN noTed ThaT DEsPite the wide raNGEs of LuMinositIes, The MW dSPhs AppEar To hAvE similar hAlo masseS, aLbEiT wIth Large SCatter [@stRi08Nat; @WoLf09] – tHis coULd be duE to scAtteR (oBsERvaTional oR InTRInsiC) mAsKing A weAk RelatIon, sCAttEr in halO mass abouT a nEW scaLe In Galaxy fOrmation, selecTiOn effects (e.G. tHe sTealth GALaxies’ inFluence as discussed in §\[sec:HAlomatcH\]), or Some aS yet Unknown efFecT. This sCalE AppearS partiCularLy StrONGly in \[FIG:mLscAtTer\_altmodeL\] DUe tO the pReFereNtial fiTting on the dSph. ThesE DatA also admit a stEepEninG POwEr lAW iNSteAd OF a tRUE scale at the low-mAss regime aS sUGgEsted by @kraV09DreV tO match tHe dSph lUminoSIty funcTion, so we pLot this reLaTion IN figUre \[fig:abunDmatch\].

We Note in FigURe \[fig:MLsCatteR\] thAt therE iS a sYstemAtic ofFSet For thE brighT dsphs. ThIs is pRiMarily duE to the tension between fitTing thE RM reLatIon for the DE aND thE bright dSPhs wIth a single PowEr lAw, as iS usED for
 the redshift of accretion  and orbit al tr aje cto ry  (in clud ing mass loss) of e ach dSph in our sample , weco u ld p e rf orm t he prof i le m atc hi ng  in  a mo re ex act ing way , but this  is  n ot practical wi th present  da ta due to th e u ncerta in tie s  in t heorbit s of t h e MW s atellites  [ @ lake10 d warforb i t s] . Th erefore, we havea dd e d both the eff ects i nq ua d r atu reto the cos mi c var i ance er r or b a ndi n Figure \[fi g:mlscatter \ ] i n orde rtod erivea lim it i ngscatter est imat e shown a s theo uter li g ht gray  regio nsinFigu r e\[ fig :m l sca t te r\] . 

T hus, the  s ha ded b ands a b o ut t heaver age r elations in F igu re \ [ fig :mlsc atter \] c an  be t hought  of a sa limiting theo reti cal scatt erab out  t he re l ation.  In  pr inciple , if th e  da ta a t  a  particular scalesc a t te r aboutthe re l at io n  with ala rge r va r i ancethan in dicatedby the sh ad ed band ,then t hi s w oul d bei ndic ativeof intri nsics catter in the$ M_{\rm vir} - L$ r el a tion shi p. This the n im p lies  tha t  t hes econd ary s ca l in g s in galaxy formati on  (e.g.  2-Dscalings such  as the fu n d a mental p lane )  c a n be fit to th e dat a set to p r ovide us efulinformat ion. Conv e r sely, if  th e s cat ter ( in cluding obser v a tion al  errors ) i s consi ste ntwit h t he  theoreti cal scat te r,  t he  se conda r y scalin grel at ion s can n ot bemeasu redat  t h atscale.Th e poss ib il ityofde tecta blei ntr insic s catter is  is part ic ul arly in teresting atth e faint en d,  wh ere it h as beennoted that despite thew ide ran ges  of l umin osities,the  MW dS phs appear  to ha ve si mi lar h alo m a s se s,al beit withl a rge  scat te r [@ stri08n at; @wolf09] – thi s  co uld be due to  sc atte r (o bse r va t ion al ori n trinsic) maskin g a weak r el a ti on, scatte r  in  h alo mas s about  a ne w  scalein galaxy  formatio n,  sel e c tio n effects(e.g. th e stealth galax i es ’ inf lue nce as  d isc ussed  in §\ [ sec :halo match\ ]) , or s ome a syet unkn own effect. This scaleappear s par tic ularly st ron g lyin \[fig: mlsc atter\_alt mod el\ ] due  to the p refe r en tia l  fitt ingo n the dSp h .The s e  d ata also ad m i t  asteep eni n g powe r la w instead of a tr u e scale at the  low - m ass  re g imeas  suggested by@kr av 0 9 drev toma tch the dSp h lumino si t y fun ction,  so we  plot t h i sr elatio n in  Fi gure \[fi g:a bu n dmatch\ ]. 
W e note  inFi gure \ [fig:m l scat t e r\] that there i s a s y s temat i c o ffset  f or theb righ t dSphs. T his is prim arilydueto th e tensi on  betwe enfi tting theR M relatio n for  the dE  a nd t hebright  dSp h s  with  a s in gle  power la w ,  a s  i su sed  for 
 the_redshift of_accretion and orbital trajectory_(including mass_loss)_of each_dSph_in our sample,_we could perform_the profile matching in_a more exacting_way,_but this is not practical with present data due to the uncertainties in the_orbits_of the_MW_satellites_[@lake10dwarforbits]. Therefore, we have added_both the effects in quadrature_to the_cosmic variance error band in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] in_order_to derive a_limiting scatter estimate shown as the outer light gray_regions in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\].

Thus, the shaded_bands about the_average_relations_in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] can_be thought of as a limiting_theoretical scatter about the relation. In_principle, if the data at a particular_scale scatter about the relation with_a larger variance than indicated_by the_shaded band, then this would_be indicative of_intrinsic scatter_in the $M_{\rm_vir} - L$ relationship. This then_implies that the_secondary scalings in galaxy formation (e.g._2-D_scalings such as_the_fundamental_plane) can_be fit to_the_data set_to_provide useful information. Conversely, if the_scatter_(including observational errors) is consistent with the_theoretical scatter, the secondary_scaling_relations cannot be measured_at that scale.

The possibility of_detectable intrinsic scatter is is particularly_interesting at_the faint_end, where it has been noted that despite the wide ranges_of luminosities, the MW dSphs appear_to have similar halo_masses, albeit_with_large scatter [@stri08nat;_@wolf09]_– this_could be due to scatter (observational or_intrinsic) masking_a weak relation, scatter in halo_mass about a new_scale_in galaxy formation, selection effects (e.g._the stealth galaxies’ influence as discussed_in §\[sec:halomatch\]), or some as_yet_unknown_effect. This scale appears particularly_strongly in \[fig:mlscatter\_altmodel\] due to the_preferential fitting on_the dSph. These data also admit a_steepening_power law instead of a true_scale_at the low-mass regime as suggested_by_@krav09drev_to match the dSph luminosity_function, so we plot this relation_in Figure \[fig:abundmatch\].

We note in Figure \[fig:mlscatter\] that there_is a systematic_offset for the bright dSphs._This_is_primarily due to the tension between fitting the RM relation_for the_dE and the_bright dSphs with a single power law, as is used_for