 is a key component of studying $\preceq$. For example, in the discrete case, if $n=0$ and $p= (p_1, p_2, p_3,0)$ are our probabilities with $p_1+p_2+p_3 = 1$, we can say we have support size 3. If we then split $p_3$ to form $q = (p_1, p_2, \frac{p_3}{2}, \frac{p_3}{2})$ then $q \preceq p$. In the continuous case, we refer to such an operation as dilation: locally, we have the same amount of density but stretch the support. This is a dilation in the continuous case via a special kind of transformation of the random variable, whose inverse we can call contractive. The result implies that the volume contractible mappings decrease uncertainty.

A volume differential invertible mapping $ h:  \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$, $y = h(x)$ will be called a volume-contractive mapping if the determinant of its Jacobian: $J = \vline \max{det} \left\{ \frac{\partial y_i}{\partial x_j}\right\} \vline$ satisfies $ 0 < J \leq 1$ for $x \in \mathbb R$.

If $h( \cdot) $ is a volume contractible inverse mapping $\mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$, then, for any random variable $X \sim f_X(x)$, it holds that: $$X \preceq Y = h(X).$$

We give a proof for the one dimensional case and, in addition, assume $f_X(x)$ and $f_Y(y)$ are invertible. Using the slice condition, we want to show that $$\mbox{prob} \{ f_X(X) \geq c\} \geq  \mbox{prob} \{ f_Y(Y) \geq c\}.$$ Developing the left hand side, we see that $$\begin{aligned}
\{ f_X (X) \geq C \} & \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(c) \} \\
                              & \Leftrightarrow & \{Y \geq h(f_X^{-1}(c)) \} \\
                              & \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(c) \}.\end
is a key component of studying $ \preceq$. For example, in the discrete subject, if $ n=0 $ and $ p= (p_1, p_2, p_3,0)$ are our probability with $ p_1+p_2+p_3 = 1 $, we can say we have support size 3. If we then cleave $ p_3 $ to form $ q = (p_1, p_2, \frac{p_3}{2 }, \frac{p_3}{2})$ then $ q \preceq p$. In the continuous case, we mention to such an operation as dilation: locally, we have the like sum of density but extend the support. This is a dilation in the continuous case via a limited kind of transformation of the random variable, whose inverse we can call contractive. The result implies that the volume contractible mappings decrease doubt. 

 A volume differential invertible mapping $ h:   \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$, $ yttrium = h(x)$ will be called a volume - contractive mapping if the determinant of its Jacobian: $ J = \vline \max{det } \left\ { \frac{\partial y_i}{\partial x_j}\right\ } \vline$ satisfies $ 0 < J \leq 1 $ for $ x \in \mathbb R$. 

 If $ h (\cdot) $ is a bulk contractible inverse mapping $ \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$, then, for any random variable $ X \sim f_X(x)$, it holds that: $ $ ten \preceq Y = h(X).$$ 

 We give a proof for the one dimensional case and, in addition, assume $ f_X(x)$ and $ f_Y(y)$ are invertible. Using the slice condition, we want to show that $ $ \mbox{prob } \ { f_X(X) \geq c\ } \geq   \mbox{prob } \ { f_Y(Y) \geq c\}.$$ Developing the left hand side, we see that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \ { f_X (X) \geq C \ } & \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(c) \ } \\ 
                               & \Leftrightarrow & \{Y \geq h(f_X^{-1}(c) ) \ } \\ 
                               & \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(c) \}.\end
 is a key component of studning $\preceq$. For gxqmple, mn the siscrete case, if $n=0$ and $p= (p_1, p_2, p_3,0)$ are onr peobabulities with $p_1+p_2+p_3 = 1$, we zan say wv have supporu size 3. If we thei split $i_3$ to rlrm $x = (p_1, p_2, \frac{p_3}{2}, \frsc{p_3}{2})$ then $q \preceq p$. In tve clntinuous case, we refer to such an jperatipn as dilation: ljcalkr, we have the same amount of density bht streuch the support. Thos is a dilation in the cojtinkous case via a spfcial kind if twqnsformation of the random variablg, whose inverse we can call contfactire. The resuot imonies that tie vollme contractinke map[ings drcrease uncertsinvy.

A colume differential iivertible mapping $ h:  \mathbb S \xightarrow \mathbb R$, $y = y(x)$ winl ba cauoed a bokuje-contgacvive mappinf if the dererminant of its Javofpsn: $J = \vline \jax{det} \lqft\{ \frac{\partial y_i}{\partial x_j}\right\} \vline$ safisfies $ 0 < J \leq 1$ for $x \in \mathbb R$.

If $h( \cdot) $ is a vojume contractible inverse mapping $\mathbb R \rightasrow \jxthyn F$, tjen, for any random variable $X \sim f_X(x)$, it holdf tnan: $$X \preceq Y = h(X).$$

Wc give a proof for tje jne dimensionxl casz ahd, in addition, asskme $f_X(x)$ and $d_Y(y)$ are igveryible. Using the slice condirion, we want ro show that $$\mbox{pxob} \{ f_X(X) \geq c\} \ggq  \mbpx{prob} \{ f_Y(Y) \geq c\}.$$ Develupinf the left jand side, de see that $$\begiv{alpgneg}
\{ f_X (X) \gtd C \} & \Leftrightarwow & \{X \gew f_X^{-1}(e) \} \\
                              & \Leftrightarrow & \{Y \heq h(y_X^{-1}(c)) \} \\
                              & \Leftrightaccow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(v) \}.\and
is a key component of studying $\preceq$. in discrete case, $n=0$ and $p= probabilities $p_1+p_2+p_3 = 1$, can say we support size 3. If we then $p_3$ to form $q = (p_1, p_2, \frac{p_3}{2}, \frac{p_3}{2})$ then $q \preceq p$. the continuous case, we refer to such an operation as dilation: locally, we the amount density stretch the support. This is a dilation in the continuous case via a special kind of of the random variable, whose inverse we can contractive. The result implies the volume contractible mappings decrease A differential invertible $ \mathbb \rightarrow \mathbb R$, = h(x)$ will be called a volume-contractive mapping if the determinant of its Jacobian: $J = \vline \left\{ \frac{\partial \vline$ satisfies 0 J 1$ for $x R$. If $h( \cdot) $ is inverse mapping $\mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$, then, any random $X \sim f_X(x)$, it holds that: \preceq Y = h(X).$$ We give a proof the one dimensional case and, in addition, assume $f_X(x)$ and $f_Y(y)$ are invertible. Using the we want to show $$\mbox{prob} \{ f_X(X) c\} \mbox{prob} f_Y(Y) c\}.$$ Developing left hand side, we see that $$\begin{aligned} \{ f_X (X) \geq \} & \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq f_X^{-1}(c) \} \\ & \{Y h(f_X^{-1}(c)) \} \\ \Leftrightarrow & \{X \geq \}.\end
 is a key component of studying $\Preceq$. For eXamplE, in The DiScreTe caSe, if $n=0$ and $p= (p_1, p_2, p_3,0)$ arE Our pRobabilities with $p_1+p_2+p_3 = 1$, we cAn say We HAve sUPpOrt siZe 3. If we tHEn SPLit $P_3$ tO fOrm $Q = (p_1, P_2, \FrAc{p_3}{2}, \frAc{p_3}{2})$ Then $q \prEceq p$. In the ConTiNuous case, we rEFeR to such an oPerAtion as dilatIon: LocallY, wE haVE the sAme AmounT of denSIty but Stretch thE sUPport. THIs is a diLATiOn in The continuous case VIa A Special kind of tRansfoRmATiON Of tHe rAndom variaBlE, whosE Inverse WE cAN CAll COntractive. The Result impliES thAt the vOlUme COntracTible MaPPinGs decrease uNcerTainty.

A voLume diFFerentiAL invertIble maPpiNg $ h:  \MathBB R \RiGhtArROw \mAThBb R$, $Y = H(x)$ wIll be calLeD a VolumE-conTRACTive MapPing If the Determinant of Its jacoBIan: $j = \vlinE \max{dEt} \leFt\{ \Frac{\pArtial Y_i}{\parTiAl x_j}\right\} \vline$ sAtisFies $ 0 < J \leq 1$ fOr $x \In \MatHbB R$.

If $h( \CDot) $ is a VolUme ContracTible inVErsE mAPPInG $\mathbb R \rightarrow \MaTHBb r$, then, for Any ranDOm VaRIable $X \siM f_x(x)$, iT holDS That: $$X \PrecEQ Y = H(X).$$

We give A proof FOr ThE one dimEnSional CaSe aNd, iN addiTIon, aSsume $f_x(x)$ and $f_Y(y)$ Are inVErtible. Using thE Slice conditioN, We WANt TO shoW thAt $$\mbox{prob} \{ f_x(X) \geQ C\} \geq  \Mbox{PRoB} \{ f_Y(y) \Geq c\}.$$ DEveloPiNG tHE left hand side, we see tHaT $$\begin{AlignEd}
\{ f_X (X) \geq C \} & \LeftRightarrow & \{x \GEQ f_X^{-1}(c) \} \\
                              & \LeftRighTArROw & \{Y \geq h(f_X^{-1}(c)) \} \\
                              & \LeftRightArrow & \{X \geq f_x^{-1}(C) \}.\end
 is a key component of stu dying $\pr eceq$ . F orex ampl e, i n the discrete case , if $n=0$ and $p= (p_ 1, p_ 2, p_3, 0 )$  areour pro b ab i l iti es  w ith  $ p _1 +p_2+ p_3  = 1$,we can say  we  h ave supports iz e 3. If we  th en split $p_ 3$to for m$q=  (p_1 , p _2, \ frac{p _ 3}{2},  \frac{p_ 3} { 2})$ t h en $q \ p r ec eq p $. In the continu o us case, we refer  to su ch an o per ati on as dila ti on: l o cally,w eh a v e t h e same amount  of density but  stret ch  th e  suppo rt. T hi s  is  a dilation  inthe conti nuousc ase via a speci al kin d o f t rans f or ma tio no f t h eran d omvariable ,wh ose i nver s e w e ca n c allcontr active. The r esu lt i m pli es th at th e vo lu me co ntract iblema ppings decrease  unc ertainty. 

A  v olu me  diff e rentia l i nve rtiblemapping $ h :\ m at hbb R \rightarrow\m a t hb b R$, $y  = h(x ) $wi l l be cal le d a  vol u m e-con trac t iv e mappin g if t h ede termina nt  of it sJac obi an: $ J  = \ vline\max{det } \le f t\{ \frac{\par t ial y_i}{\par t ia l x_ j }\ri ght \} \vline$sati s fies  $ 0 <J \ l eq 1$  for$x \i n  \mathbb R$.

If $h (\cdot)  $ is  a volume con tractiblei n v erse map ping $\ m athbb R \right arrow  \mathbb R $ , then,for a ny rando m variabl e $X \simf_X (x) $,ith o ld s that: $$X \ p r eceq  Y  = h(X) .$$ 

We gi vea p roo f f or  the onedimensio na lca se  an d, in addition ,ass um e $ f_X(x ) $ and$f_Y( y)$ar ei nve rtible. Us i n g th esl icecon di tion,  wew ant  to sho w that $$ \mb o x{pr ob }\{ f_X( X) \geq c\} \ ge q  \mbox{p ro b}\{ f_Y ( Y ) \geq c \}.$$ Developing the le f t handsid e, we  see  that $$\ beg in{ali gne d }
\{ f _X (X)  \geq  C  \} &  \Lef t r ig hta rr ow & \{X \ g e q f _X^{- 1} (c)\} \\
                          & \Lef tri ghta r r ow  &\ {Y \ge qh (f_ X ^ {-1}(c)) \} \\                       &  \Leftr ightarr ow &\ {X \geq  f_X^{-1} (c) \}.\e nd 
 is_a key_component of studying $\preceq$._For example,_in_the discrete_case,_if $n=0$ and_$p= (p_1, p_2,_p_3,0)$ are our probabilities_with $p_1+p_2+p_3 =_1$,_we can say we have support size 3. If we then split $p_3$ to_form_$q =_(p_1,_p_2,_\frac{p_3}{2}, \frac{p_3}{2})$ then $q \preceq_p$. In the continuous case,_we refer_to such an operation as dilation: locally, we_have_the same amount_of density but stretch the support. This is a_dilation in the continuous case via_a special kind_of_transformation_of the random variable,_whose inverse we can call contractive._The result implies that the volume_contractible mappings decrease uncertainty.

A volume differential invertible_mapping $ h:  \mathbb R_\rightarrow \mathbb R$, $y =_h(x)$ will_be called a volume-contractive mapping_if the determinant_of its_Jacobian: $J =_\vline \max{det} \left\{ \frac{\partial y_i}{\partial x_j}\right\}_\vline$ satisfies $_0 < J \leq 1$ for_$x_\in \mathbb R$.

If_$h(_\cdot)_$ is_a volume contractible_inverse_mapping $\mathbb_R_\rightarrow \mathbb R$, then, for any_random_variable $X \sim f_X(x)$, it holds that:_$$X \preceq Y =_h(X).$$

We_give a proof for_the one dimensional case and,_in addition, assume $f_X(x)$ and $f_Y(y)$_are invertible._Using the_slice condition, we want to show that $$\mbox{prob} \{ f_X(X) \geq_c\} \geq  \mbox{prob} \{ f_Y(Y)_\geq c\}.$$ Developing the_left hand_side,_we see that_$$\begin{aligned}
\{_f_X (X)_\geq C \} & \Leftrightarrow & \{X_\geq f_X^{-1}(c)_\} \\
    _   __     _     _    ___ & \Leftrightarrow & \{Y_\geq h(f_X^{-1}(c)) \} \\
  _  _      __     __     ___ & \Leftrightarrow & \{X_\geq f_X^{-1}(c) \}.\end