0$, the state should be confined entirely to the defect site, if only $\nu \neq 0$.

As shown in Ref. , this conjecture indeed is correct in the high-frequency regime, where $\hbar\omega$ is significantly larger than the bare band width $|W|$. This is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:defect\] for a defect with strength $\nu/W = 0.1$: The upper panel shows the occupation probabilities $p_n = |a_n|^2$ for a defect located at the site $n = 0$ in the absence of the periodic force; the discrete values have been connected by lines to guide the eye. The lower panel shows the state under the influence of a periodic force with high frequency $\hbar\omega/W = 7.5$ and scaled amplitude $eFd/(\hbar\omega) = j_{0,1} \simeq 2.4048$, equal to the first zero of ${\rm J}_0$: As expected, the state now is confined almost entirely to the defect site. Hence, the extension of the defect state is governed by the driving force’s amplitude. This effect will be exploited in Sec. \[sec:twodefs\] to control the population transfer between two communicating defects.

Energy splitting and quasienergy splitting for communicating defects {#sec:split}
====================================================================

In the following, the real amplitudes $a_\ell$ for the state bound by a single defect placed at a site $\gamma > 0$ are normalized such that $$\label{eq:normdef}
   \sum_{\ell=1}^{\infty} \left|a_{\ell}\right|^2 = 1 \;,$$ which implies that the normalization constant ${\cal N}$ in Eq. (\[eq:al\]) is now given by $$\begin{aligned}
   {\cal N} &=& \left({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gamma}x_-^{2(\gamma-i)}+
   \sum_{i=\gamma+1}^{\infty}x_-^{2(i-\gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2}
\nonumber \\
   &=& \sqrt{\frac{1-x_-^2}{1+x_-^2-x_-^{2\gamma}}} \;.
   \label{eq:normerg} \end{aligned}$$ This defect state obeys the Schrödinger equation $$\label{eq:E0}
   \left( \hat{H}_
0 $, the state should be confined entirely to the defect web site, if merely $ \nu \neq 0$. 

 As shown in Ref.  , this conjecture indeed is right in the high - frequency regimen, where $ \hbar\omega$ is significantly larger than the unsheathed band width $ |W|$. This is illustrated in Fig.   \[fig: defect\ ] for a blemish with forte $ \nu / W = 0.1 $: The upper panel show the occupation probabilities $ p_n = |a_n|^2 $ for a defect situate at the web site $ n = 0 $ in the absence of the periodic force; the discrete value have been connected by lines to steer the eye. The lower panel show the state under the influence of a periodic force with high frequency $ \hbar\omega / W = 7.5 $ and scaled amplitude $ eFd/(\hbar\omega) = j_{0,1 } \simeq 2.4048 $, adequate to the first zero of $ { \rm J}_0 $: As expect, the state now is confined about entirely to the defect site. Hence, the extension of the defect state is govern by the driving force ’s amplitude. This effect will be exploited in Sec.   \[sec: twodefs\ ] to control the population transfer between two communicating defects. 

 Energy splitting and quasienergy splitting for communicating defect { # sec: split } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In the following, the veridical amplitudes $ a_\ell$ for the state bound by a single blemish placed at a web site $ \gamma > 0 $ are normalized such that $ $ \label{eq: normdef } 
    \sum_{\ell=1}^{\infty } \left|a_{\ell}\right|^2 = 1 \;,$$ which implies that the normalization changeless $ { \cal N}$ in Eq.   (\[eq: al\ ]) is now given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
    { \cal N } & = & \left({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gamma}x_-^{2(\gamma - i)}+ 
    \sum_{i=\gamma+1}^{\infty}x_-^{2(i-\gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2 } 
 \nonumber \\ 
    & = & \sqrt{\frac{1 - x_-^2}{1+x_-^2 - x_-^{2\gamma } } } \; . 
    \label{eq: normerg } \end{aligned}$$ This defect state obeys the Schrödinger equation $ $ \label{eq: E0 } 
    \left (\hat{H } _
0$, thf state should be confintd entirely to thg eefect site, jf only $\vu \neq 0$.

As shown in Ref. , this ronjwcturt indeed is correct in the hpgh-frequebcy cegime, where $\hbac\kmega$ is signjnicanclb larger than tme bare bang width $|W|$. This ir nllustrated in Fig. \[fig:defect\] for a desect wiyh strength $\nu/W = 0.1$: Tht u[per iakel shows the occupation probabimities $k_n = |a_n|^2$ for a defecy located at the site $n = 0$ ln tje absence of the oeriodic fotde; eye discrete xalues havt yeen connecjed by lines to guide the eye. Thd lowzr panel shiww tjg state undec the pnfluence of a periodhc forcr with high frcquenry $\hvar\omega/W = 7.5$ and scalev amplitude $eFd/(\hbar\oiega) = j_{0,1} \shmzq 2.4048$, equal to the firsr zero mf ${\rk J}_0$: Xw ebpedtxd, fhe stwte now is cohfined almowt entirely to the cesvvt site. Hencs, the qxeension of the defect state is governed by the driving force’s ampoitude. This effect wipl be expjoited in Sec. \[sec:twodefs\] to control the population tranawer bctwedb hwo communicating defects.

Energy splitting and susspenergy splitting for communocwtogg defects {#sez:split}
====================================================================

Nh fhe following, the geal amklitudws $a_\ell$ fjr tne state bound by a single eefect placeb ar a site $\gamma > 0$ axe normalizeb such that $$\label{eq:normdef}
   \sum_{\elu=1}^{\inffy} \left|a_{\ell}\gight|^2 = 1 \;,$$ sfich implies thag tme tormalization constant ${\cal N}$ in Eq. (\[ew:al\]) ns now gkven by $$\bedin{aligned}
   {\cal N} &=& \left({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gamma}x_-^{2(\hamma-n)}+
   \sgm_{i=\gamma+1}^{\invty}x_-^{2(i-\gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2}
\nonumber \\
   &=& \sqrv{\hrac{1-x_-^2}{1+x_-^2-x_-^{2\gamma}}} \;.
   \latel{eq:norierg} \cnd{aligned}$$ This defect state pbeys tke Schfödinger eqlation $$\lauel{eq:E0}
   \lefe( \hat{H}_
0$, the state should be confined entirely defect if only \neq 0$. As conjecture is correct in high-frequency regime, where is significantly larger than the bare width $|W|$. This is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:defect\] for a defect with strength = 0.1$: The upper panel shows the occupation probabilities $p_n = |a_n|^2$ for defect at site = 0$ in the absence of the periodic force; the discrete values have been connected by to guide the eye. The lower panel shows state under the influence a periodic force with high $\hbar\omega/W 7.5$ and amplitude = \simeq 2.4048$, equal the first zero of ${\rm J}_0$: As expected, the state now is confined almost entirely to the site. Hence, of the state governed the driving force’s effect will be exploited in Sec. the population transfer between two communicating defects. Energy and quasienergy for communicating defects {#sec:split} ==================================================================== In following, the real amplitudes $a_\ell$ for the state by a single defect placed at a site $\gamma > 0$ are normalized such that \left|a_{\ell}\right|^2 = 1 \;,$$ implies that the constant N}$ Eq. is now by $$\begin{aligned} {\cal N} &=& \left({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gamma}x_-^{2(\gamma-i)}+ \sum_{i=\gamma+1}^{\infty}x_-^{2(i-\gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2} \nonumber \\ &=& \sqrt{\frac{1-x_-^2}{1+x_-^2-x_-^{2\gamma}}} \label{eq:normerg} \end{aligned}$$ This defect state obeys the Schrödinger equation $$\label{eq:E0}
0$, the state should be confined eNtirely to tHe defEct SitE, iF onlY $\nu \nEq 0$.

As shown in Ref. , THis cOnjecture indeed is correCt in tHe HIgh-fREqUency Regime, wHErE $\HBar\OmEgA$ is SiGNiFicanTly Larger tHan the bare BanD wIdth $|W|$. This is iLLuStrated in FIg. \[fIg:defect\] for a DefEct witH sTreNGth $\nu/w = 0.1$: ThE uppeR panel SHows thE occupatiOn PRobabiLIties $p_n = |A_N|^2$ FoR a deFect located at the sITe $N = 0$ In the absence of The perIoDIc FORce; The Discrete vaLuEs havE Been conNEcTED By lINes to guide the Eye. The lower PAneL shows ThE stATe undeR the iNfLUenCe of a periodIc foRce with hiGh freqUEncy $\hbaR\Omega/W = 7.5$ aNd scalEd aMplItudE $EFD/(\hBar\OmEGa) = j_{0,1} \SImEq 2.4048$, eQUal To the firSt ZeRo of ${\rM J}_0$: As EXPECted, The StatE now iS confined almoSt eNtirELy tO the dEfect Site. heNce, thE extenSion oF tHe defect state is GoveRned by the DriViNg fOrCe’s amPLitude. thiS efFect wilL be explOIteD iN sEC. \[sEc:twodefs\] to control ThE POpUlation tRansfeR BeTwEEn two comMuNicAtinG DEfectS.

EneRGy SplittinG and quASiEnErgy splItTing foR cOmmUniCatinG DefeCts {#sec:Split}
====================================================================

In tHe folLOwing, the real amPLitudes $a_\ell$ foR ThE STaTE bouNd bY a single defEct pLAced At a sITe $\GamMA > 0$ are nOrmalIzED sUCh that $$\label{eq:normdeF}
   \sUm_{\ell=1}^{\iNfty} \lEft|a_{\ell}\right|^2 = 1 \;,$$ wHich implieS THAt the norMaliZAtIOn constant ${\cal N}$ In Eq. (\[eQ:al\]) is now giVEn by $$\begiN{aligNed}
   {\cal N} &=& \lEft({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gaMMA}x_-^{2(\gamma-i)}+
   \Sum_{I=\gaMma+1}^{\InfTY}X_-^{2(i-\Gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2}
\nonUMBer \\
   &=& \sQrT{\frac{1-x_-^2}{1+x_-^2-X_-^{2\gaMma}}} \;.
   \labeL{eq:NorMerG} \enD{aLigned}$$ ThiS defect sTaTe ObEyS thE SchrÖDinger eqUaTioN $$\lAbeL{eq:E0}
   \lEFt( \hat{H}_
0$, the state should be co nfined ent irely  to  th edefe ct s ite, if only $ \ nu \ neq 0$.

As shown in R ef. ,  t h is c o nj ectur e indee d  i s cor re ct  in  t h ehigh- fre quencyregime, wh ere  $ \hbar\omega$ is  significa ntl y larger tha n t he bar eban d  widt h $ |W|$.  Thisi s illu strated i nF ig. \[ f ig:defe c t \]  for  a defect with st r en g th $\nu/W = 0. 1$: Th eu pp e r  pa nel  shows the  o ccupa t ion pro b ab i l i tie s  $p_n = |a_n| ^2$ for a d e fec t loca te d a t  the s ite $ n=  0$  in the abs ence  of the p eriodi c  force; the dis creteval ues  hav e  b ee n c on n ect e dbyl ine s to gui de  t he ey e. T h e l ower  pa nelshows  the state un der  the inf luenc e ofa pe ri odicforcewithhi gh frequency $\ hbar \omega/W= 7 .5 $ a nd  scal e d ampl itu de$eFd/(\ hbar\om e ga)  = j _ {0 ,1} \simeq 2.4048$ ,e q ua l to the  first ze ro of ${\rm  J }_0 $: A s expec ted, th e statenow is co nf ined al mo st ent ir ely  to  thed efec t site . Hence,  thee xtension of th e  defect state is g ov e rned  by  the drivin g fo r ce’s  amp l it ude .  This  effe ct wi l l be exploited in S ec . \[se c:two defs\] to con trol the p o p u lation t rans f er between two co mmuni cating def e cts.

En ergysplittin g and qua s i energy s pli tti ngfor c om municating de f e cts{# sec:spl it} 
====== === === === === == ========= ======== == == == == === ===== = ======== == === =
In  thef ollowi ng, t he r ea la mpl itudes$ a_ \ e ll$fo rthesta te  boun d by a s ingle d efect pla ced at a  s it e $\gam ma > 0$ are n or malized su ch  th at $$\ l a bel{eq:n ormdef}
   \sum_{\ell=1 } ^{\inft y}\left |a_{ \ell}\rig ht| ^2 = 1  \; , $$ whi ch imp liesth att h e nor m a li zat io n constant $ {\c al N} $in E q. (\[e q:al\]) is now giv e n b y $$\begin{al ign ed} { \ca l  N }  &= &\ lef t ( {{\sum_{i=1}^{\ gamma}x_-^ {2 ( \g amma-i)}+  \ su m_{i=\g amma+1} ^{\in f ty}x_-^ {2(i-\gam ma)}}}\ri gh t)^{ - 1 /2} 
\nonumber  \\
   & =& \sqrt{ \ frac{ 1 -x _-^2} {1+ x_-^2- x_ -^{ 2\gam ma}}}\ ;.   \l abel{e q: normer g} \e nd {aligned }$$ This defect state o beys t he Sc hrö dinger eq uat i on$$\label{ eq:E 0}
   \lef t(\ha t{H}_ 
0$, the_state should_be confined entirely to_the defect_site,_if only_$\nu_\neq 0$.

As shown_in Ref. , this_conjecture indeed is correct_in the high-frequency_regime,_where $\hbar\omega$ is significantly larger than the bare band width $|W|$. This is illustrated_in_Fig. \[fig:defect\] for_a_defect_with strength $\nu/W = 0.1$:_The upper panel shows the_occupation probabilities_$p_n = |a_n|^2$ for a defect located at_the_site $n =_0$ in the absence of the periodic force; the_discrete values have been connected by_lines to guide_the_eye._The lower panel shows_the state under the influence of_a periodic force with high frequency_$\hbar\omega/W = 7.5$ and scaled amplitude $eFd/(\hbar\omega)_= j_{0,1} \simeq 2.4048$, equal to_the first zero of ${\rm_J}_0$: As_expected, the state now is_confined almost entirely_to the_defect site. Hence,_the extension of the defect state_is governed by_the driving force’s amplitude. This effect_will_be exploited in_Sec. \[sec:twodefs\]_to_control the_population transfer between_two_communicating defects.

Energy_splitting_and quasienergy splitting for communicating defects_{#sec:split}
====================================================================

In_the following, the real amplitudes $a_\ell$ for_the state bound by_a_single defect placed at_a site $\gamma > 0$_are normalized such that $$\label{eq:normdef}
 _ \sum_{\ell=1}^{\infty}_\left|a_{\ell}\right|^2 =_1 \;,$$ which implies that the normalization constant ${\cal N}$ in_Eq. (\[eq:al\]) is now given by $$\begin{aligned}
_  {\cal N}_&=& \left({{\sum_{i=1}^{\gamma}x_-^{2(\gamma-i)}+
__ \sum_{i=\gamma+1}^{\infty}x_-^{2(i-\gamma)}}}\right)^{-1/2}
\nonumber \\
__ &=&_\sqrt{\frac{1-x_-^2}{1+x_-^2-x_-^{2\gamma}}} \;.
   \label{eq:normerg} \end{aligned}$$ This_defect state_obeys the Schrödinger equation $$\label{eq:E0}
 _ \left( \hat{H}_