 pulsations and photon time-delays from distinct points on the NS surface. Gravitational redshifting of photons is also entirely dependent on the compactness, and manifests principally in the energy-dependent normalisation of the pulse profile. Relativistic beaming introduces asymmetry (harmonic content) in the pulse profile; locally, beaming depends on the projected velocity of the (relativistically moving) hotspot along a light-ray connecting a point on the local NS surface to the observer. The functional form of the local speed contains R and the (asymptotic) spin frequency of the uniformly rotating star; these two parameters are degenerate with respect to influence on local beaming. However, the spin frequency can be accurately measured from the observed pulse frequency, thus breaking this degeneracy and increasing the statistical constraining power on R. Figure \[fig:gr2\] demonstrates the sensitivity of the observable to changing R alone, with all other model parameters fixed. The beaming is also sensitive to local time dilation at the NS surface, which is in turn sensitive to the compactness (M/R). The pulse profile model enters in a generative model for telescope photon data, and thus — via existing fitting algorithms — yields a statistical constraint on M and R.

Naturally, there are additional model parameters affecting the pulse profile, which must be properly marginalised over when statistically inferring M and R. These include the specific details of the photospheric comoving radiation field (as a function of surface coordinates, emission direction, and energy), and *a priori* unknown geometrical factors (the hotspot size, shape, and colatitude $\theta$; observer inclination $i$), and emission from the rest of the star and disk, which may also exhibit pulsations [@Poutanen08]. However, the resulting degeneracies can be broken, allowing successful recovery of M and R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14b, @Miller15, @Stevens16). Knowledge of the geometrical factors (enabled by the polarimetry capabilities of eXTP) further improves statistical constraining power via degeneracy breaking: M, R, and the nuisance parameters all enter in generative models for additional observable quantities.

Radiation emitted by hotspots is expected to be linearly polarised because the opacity is dominated by electron scattering [@Viironen04]. Both the observed polarization degree (PD) and polarization angle (PA) change with the rotational phase $\phi$ following variations of the angle between the spot normal and the line-of-sight and
pulsations and photon time - delays from distinct period on the NS open. Gravitational redshifting of photons is also entirely subject on the compactness, and manifests chiefly in the energy - dependent normalisation of the pulsation visibility. Relativistic beaming introduces asymmetry (harmonic subject) in the pulse profile; locally, beaming depend on the projected velocity of the (relativistically moving) hotspot along a light - beam connecting a point on the local NS surface to the perceiver. The functional form of the local focal ratio contains R and the (asymptotic) tailspin frequency of the uniformly rotating star topology; these two parameters are degenerate with respect to influence on local beaming. However, the tailspin frequency can be accurately measured from the observed pulse frequency, thus breaking this degeneracy and increase the statistical constraining power on R. Figure \[fig: gr2\ ] demonstrates the sensitivity of the observable to changing R alone, with all other model parameters fixed. The beaming is besides sensible to local time dilation at the NS surface, which is in turn sensible to the concentration (M / R). The pulse profile model enters in a generative model for telescope photon data, and thus — via existing fitting algorithm — yields a statistical constraint on M and R. 

 Naturally, there are additional model parameters affecting the pulse profile, which must be properly marginalised over when statistically inferring M and R. These admit the specific details of the photospheric comoving radiotherapy battlefield (as a function of surface coordinates, emission direction, and energy), and * a priori * unknown geometric factors (the hotspot size, shape, and colatitude $ \theta$; observer inclination $ i$), and discharge from the rest of the headliner and disk, which may also expose pulsations [ @Poutanen08 ]. However, the result degeneracies can be violate, allowing successful convalescence of M and R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14b, @Miller15, @Stevens16). Knowledge of the geometrical factors (enabled by the polarimetry capability of eXTP) farther improves statistical stiffen power via degeneracy breaking: M, R, and the nuisance parameters all enter in generative models for extra observable quantities. 

 radiation sickness emitted by hotspots is expected to be linearly polarised because the opacity is dominated by electron scattering [ @Viironen04 ]. Both the observed polarization academic degree (PD) and polarization angle (PA) change with the rotational phase $ \phi$ following variations of the angle between the spot normal and the line - of - sight and
 pupsations and photon time-aelays from disjibct pomnts on the NS rurface. Gravitational redshihtint of kkotons is also entirdly depenfent on rhe rompactness, and manifests prindlpallv mn the energy-dekendent normdlisation of tve pblse profile. Relativistic beaming ineroducex wsymmetry (harmjnic sontsnt) in the pulse profile; locally, bsaming vepends on the lrojected velocity of the (gelahivistically movinh) hotspot aoong q light-ray cunnecting a point on tge local NS surface to the obsefver. Che functiobao fltm of the loral spved contains V and tve (asymltotic) spin frcquenry od the uniformly rotatmng star; these two pwrameters axe degenerate with rewpwct tm inxluevxe un moral beamijg. Iowever, the spin frequwncy can be accurattly neasured from the ofsqrved pulse frequency, thus breaking thiv dsgeneracy and increasint the statistical condtraining power on R. Figure \[fig:gr2\] demonstrates the sensitieity kw tkc uvsfrvable to changing R alone, with all other moqsl psrameters fixeb. The beaming is apsp sensitive to local tije dilation at the NS sursace, qhich is yn tirn sensitive to the compacrness (M/R). The pulse profile modep enters in a ggneratove model for telescope phofon data, anf thus — vjx existing fittivg slcorithms — yields a statistycal consvrainc on M avd R.

Maturajly, there wre additional model parwmetets affacting the pulse profile, which must be properly marginakived over whzn stabistically infewring M and R. Jhese incjude ghe specifpc detailv of the phjtospheric coklving radiatmon field (as q fubction uw surface coorcinates, emission dieection, and energy), ana *a priori* unknocu teometrical facyorr (tre hptf[ot size, sha[e, avd zplatigude $\thtca$; icserfer inclination $i$), ang emjssion from the rext of the wtar and disk, which msy also exhibit pupsatimns [@Poutsneg08]. However, the resulting degenedacies caj bc broken, alloring successful xecovery of M and R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14b, @Miller15, @Svevens16). Knowledge of thg geometrical factors (tnabled by thx polawimetry cdpabilities of eXTP) durther improves xtatistical constrainjng pofer vla degeneracy breaking: M, R, and the nuisance parameters all enter in generqtive models for asditoonal oysexvable zuanvivies.

Radiation eminted by hotspots is expected to ue linearlf 'olarised because the opacity ir dominated bi electron scattering [@Viirknen04]. Botn the observed polarization degtee (PD) and polarization sngle (PA) chanfe with thx rotational phase $\pni$ folnowint variariond of the angld brtaeen the dpot nkrmal and the line-of-sight and
pulsations and photon time-delays from distinct points NS Gravitational redshifting photons is also and principally in the normalisation of the profile. Relativistic beaming introduces asymmetry (harmonic in the pulse profile; locally, beaming depends on the projected velocity of the moving) hotspot along a light-ray connecting a point on the local NS surface the The form the local speed contains R and the (asymptotic) spin frequency of the uniformly rotating star; these parameters are degenerate with respect to influence on beaming. However, the spin can be accurately measured from observed frequency, thus this and the statistical constraining on R. Figure \[fig:gr2\] demonstrates the sensitivity of the observable to changing R alone, with all other parameters fixed. is also to time at the NS is in turn sensitive to the pulse profile model enters in a generative model telescope photon and thus — via existing fitting — yields a statistical constraint on M and Naturally, there are additional model parameters affecting the pulse profile, which must be properly marginalised statistically inferring M and These include the details the comoving field (as function of surface coordinates, emission direction, and energy), and *a priori* geometrical factors (the hotspot size, shape, and colatitude $\theta$; observer and from the rest the star and disk, may exhibit pulsations [@Poutanen08]. However, degeneracies be recovery M R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14b, @Miller15, Knowledge of the geometrical factors by the polarimetry capabilities constraining power via degeneracy breaking: M, R, and nuisance parameters all enter in generative models additional observable quantities. Radiation emitted by hotspots is expected to be linearly because the dominated by electron scattering [@Viironen04]. Both the observed degree (PD) and polarization (PA) change with the rotational phase $\phi$ following variations the between the normal and the and
 pulsations and photon time-deLays from diStincT poIntS oN the nS suRface. GravitatiONal rEdshifting of photons is aLso enTiREly dEPeNdent On the coMPaCTNesS, aNd ManIfEStS prinCipAlly in tHe energy-dePenDeNt normalisatIOn Of the pulse ProFile. RelativiStiC beamiNg IntROduceS asYmmetRy (harmONic conTent) in the PuLSe profILe; localLY, BeAminG depends on the projECtED velocity of the (RelatiViSTiCALly MovIng) hotspot AlOng a lIGht-ray cONnECTIng A Point on the locAl NS surface TO thE obserVeR. ThE FunctiOnal fOrM Of tHe local speeD conTains R and The (asyMPtotic) sPIn frequEncy of The UniFormLY rOtAtiNg STar; THeSe tWO paRameters ArE dEgeneRate WITH RespEct To inFluenCe on local beamIng. howeVEr, tHe spiN freqUencY cAn be aCcuratEly meAsUred from the obseRved Pulse freqUenCy, ThuS bReakiNG this dEgeNerAcy and iNcreasiNG thE sTATIsTical constraining pOwER On r. Figure \[fIg:gr2\] deMOnStRAtes the sEnSitIvitY OF the oBserVAbLe to chanGing R aLOnE, wIth all oThEr modeL pAraMetErs fiXEd. ThE beamiNg is also SensiTIve to local time DIlation at the Ns SuRFAcE, WhicH is In turn sensiTive TO the CompACtNesS (m/R). The Pulse PrOFiLE model enters in a geneRaTive moDel foR telescope phoTon data, and THUS — via exisTing FItTIng algorithms — yIelds A statisticAL constraInt on m and R.

NatUrally, theRE Are additIonAl mOdeL paRAMeTers affecting THE pulSe Profile, WhiCh must bE prOpeRly MarGiNalised ovEr when stAtIsTiCaLly InferRIng M and R. thEse InCluDe the SPecifiC detaIls oF tHe PHotOspheriC CoMOVing RaDiAtioN fiElD (as a fUnctIOn oF surfacE coordinaTes, EMissIoN dIrectioN, and energy), and *A pRiori* unknoWn GeoMetricAL Factors (tHe hotspot size, shape, and coLAtitude $\TheTa$; obsErveR inclinatIon $I$), and emIssIOn from The resT of thE sTar AND disk, WHIcH maY aLso exhibit PULsaTions [@poUtanEn08]. HowevEr, the resulting degeNEraCies can be brokEn, aLlowING sUccESsFUl rEcOVerY OF M and R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14B, @Miller15, @SteVeNS16). KNowledge of THe gEoMetricaL factorS (enabLEd by the PolarimetRy capabilItIes oF ExTP) Further impRoves staTistical cONstraINiNg powEr vIa degeNeRacY breaKing: M, R, ANd tHe nuiSance pArAmeterS all eNtEr in geneRative models for additionAl obseRvablE quAntities.

RAdiATioN emitted bY hotSpots is expEctEd tO be liNeaRLy polArisED bEcaUSe the OpacITy is dominATeD by ELEcTron scatterING [@viiRonen04]. botH The obsErveD polarization degrEE (PD) and polarizaTion ANGle (pA) cHAnge WiTh the rotationaL phAsE $\PHi$ followInG variations Of the angLe BEtweeN the spOt normAl and thE LInE-Of-sighT and
 pulsations and photon tim e-delays f rom d ist inc tpoin ts o n the NS surfa c e. G ravitational redshifti ng of  p h oton s  i s als o entir e ly d epe nd en t o nt he  comp act ness, a nd manifes tspr incipally in th e energy-d epe ndent normal isa tion o fthe pulse  pr ofile . Rela t ivisti c beaming  i n troduc e s asymm e t ry  (ha rmonic content) i n  t h e pulse profil e; loc al l y, b eam ing  depends o nthe p r ojected ve l o c ity of the (relat ivistically mov ing) h ot spo t  along  a li gh t -ra y connectin g apoint onthe lo c al NS s u rface t o theobs erv er.T he  f unc ti o nal fo rmo f t he local  s pe ed co ntai n s R  and  th e (a sympt otic) spin fr equ ency ofthe u nifor mlyro tatin g star ; the se  two parameters  are  degenera tewi thre spect to inf lue nce  on loc al beam i ng.  H o w e ve r, the spin freque nc y ca n be acc uratel y  m ea s ured fro mthe  obs e r ved p ulse fr equency,  thusb re ak ing thi sdegene ra cyand  incr e asin g thestatisti cal c o nstraining pow e r on R. Figur e  \ [ f ig : gr2\ ] d emonstrates  the sens itiv i ty  of the o bserv ab l et o changing R alone,  w ith al l oth er model para meters fix e d .  The bea ming is also sensitive  to l ocal timed ilationat th e NS sur face, whi c h  is in t urn  se nsi tiv e to  the compactn e s s (M /R ). Thepul se prof ile  mo del  en te rs in a g enerativ emo de lfor  tele s cope pho to n d at a,and t h us — v ia ex isti ng  f i tti ng algo r it h m s —yi el ds a  st at istic al c o nst raint o n M and R .
N atur al ly , there  are addition al  model par am ete rs aff e c ting the  pulse profile, which m u st be p rop erlymarg inalisedove r when  st a tistic ally i nferr in g M a nd R. T he sein clude thes p eci fic d et ails  of the  photospheric como v ing  radiation fi eld  (as a  f unc t io n  of  s u rfa c e  coordinates, e mission di re c ti on, and en e rgy ),  and *a  priori * unk n own geo metricalfactors ( th e ho t s pot  size, sha pe, andcolatitud e  $\th e ta $; ob ser ver in cl ina tion$i$),a ndemiss ion fr om  the r est o fthe star  and disk, which may al so exh ibitpul sations [ @Po u tan en08]. Ho weve r, the res ult ing  dege ner a ciescanb ebro k en, a llow i ng succes s fu l r e c ov ery of M an d R  (@ Lo13,  @P s altis1 4b,@Miller15, @Steve n s16). Knowledg e of t hegeo m etri ca l factors (ena ble db y  the pol ar imetry capa bilities  o f  eXTP ) furt her im provess t at i stical  con str aining po wer  v i a degen er ac y  break ing:  M , R, a nd the nuis a n ce parameters al l ent e r  in g e ner ative  m odels f o r ad ditional o bservable q uantit ies. 

Rad iationem ittedbyho tspots ise xpected t o belinearl ypola ris ed bec ause t he op acit yisdominated b ye le ct r onscat terin g[@Vi ironen04] .  Both th e o b servedpo lar i z ationd eg r e e (PD) and  po lariz a t ion angle( PA)c ha n ge wi th the  rotat ional p h ase  $ \phi$ f oll o w ing varia tions oft hean glebetweenth e sp ot  no rm al and the line -of-sigh t and
 pulsations_and photon_time-delays from distinct points_on the_NS_surface. Gravitational_redshifting_of photons is_also entirely dependent_on the compactness, and_manifests principally in_the_energy-dependent normalisation of the pulse profile. Relativistic beaming introduces asymmetry (harmonic content) in the_pulse_profile; locally,_beaming_depends_on the projected velocity of_the (relativistically moving) hotspot along_a light-ray_connecting a point on the local NS surface_to_the observer. The_functional form of the local speed contains R and_the (asymptotic) spin frequency of the_uniformly rotating star;_these_two_parameters are degenerate with_respect to influence on local beaming._However, the spin frequency can be_accurately measured from the observed pulse frequency,_thus breaking this degeneracy and increasing_the statistical constraining power on_R. Figure_\[fig:gr2\] demonstrates the sensitivity of_the observable to_changing R_alone, with all_other model parameters fixed. The beaming_is also sensitive_to local time dilation at the_NS_surface, which is_in_turn_sensitive to_the compactness (M/R)._The_pulse profile_model_enters in a generative model for_telescope_photon data, and thus — via existing_fitting algorithms — yields_a_statistical constraint on M_and R.

Naturally, there are additional_model parameters affecting the pulse profile,_which must_be properly_marginalised over when statistically inferring M and R. These include the_specific details of the photospheric comoving_radiation field (as a_function of_surface_coordinates, emission direction,_and_energy), and_*a priori* unknown geometrical factors (the hotspot_size, shape,_and colatitude $\theta$; observer inclination $i$),_and emission from the_rest_of the star and disk, which_may also exhibit pulsations [@Poutanen08]. However,_the resulting degeneracies can be_broken,_allowing_successful recovery of M and_R (@Lo13, @Psaltis14b, @Miller15, @Stevens16). Knowledge_of the geometrical_factors (enabled by the polarimetry capabilities of_eXTP)_further improves statistical constraining power via_degeneracy_breaking: M, R, and the nuisance_parameters_all_enter in generative models for_additional observable quantities.

Radiation emitted by hotspots_is expected to be linearly polarised because the opacity_is dominated by_electron scattering [@Viironen04]. Both the_observed_polarization_degree (PD) and polarization angle (PA) change with the rotational_phase $\phi$_following variations of_the angle between the spot normal and the line-of-sight and