 fall in the range of uncertain variability. It should be noted that, although the criterion used here to gauge variability of a blazar is somewhat arbitrary, it does provide a way to compare the numbers obtained. Also, as McLaughlin et al. (1996) have noted, changing these criteria by 20% yields similar results. If the FSRQs and the BL Lac objects are considered separately, it is found that 76% of the FSRQs in the sample are variable, while 16% are non-variable. Similarly, for the BL Lac objects, 50% are variable, while 21% are definitely non-variable. It should be noted that the low intrinsic luminosity of BL Lac objects could bias observations (see discussions in §5.2). Figure 2 shows the distribution of the variability indices for the FSRQs and the BL Lac objects. The BL Lac objects in the data set are found to be less variable on the average than the FSRQs. Recent observations of flares in BL Lac objects, however, modify some of these conclusions. For example, BL Lac was detected during a $\gamma$-ray outburst with an average flux of $(171\pm42)\times 10^{-8}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in July 1997 (Bloom et al. 1997). BL Lac would have a high value of $V$ in Table 1, if this information were taken into account.

Figure 3 shows a plot of the variability index as a function of the weighted average flux for the blazars in Table 1. Note that the sources that have the highest average fluxes all have high variability indices. Only 2 out of 18 blazars with average flux less than $1\times 10^{-7}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ have a variability index greater than 2.5. In fact, there are no non-variable blazars in the sample that have high flux.

The study of short term variability in blazars is always limited by the small numbers of photons detected in the short time intervals at $\gamma$-ray energies. The shortest time-scale variations detected for blazars with EGRET are for PKS 1622-297 (Mattox et al. 1997b) and 3C 279 (Wehrle et al. 1997). For both these objects the flux was found to increase by a factor of two or more in less than 8 hours. Other objects that have shown flux variations over the period of a few days are 3C 279
fall in the range of uncertain variability. It should be note that, although the standard used here to gauge unevenness of a blazar is somewhat arbitrary, it does put up a way to compare the phone number obtained. Also, as McLaughlin et al. (1996) have note, changing these criteria by 20% output similar results. If the FSRQs and the BL Lac object are considered separately, it is found that 76% of the FSRQs in the sample are variable, while 16% are non - variable. Similarly, for the BL Lac object, 50% are variable, while 21% are definitely non - variable. It should be note that the low intrinsic luminosity of BL Lac objects could bias observations (see discussion in § 5.2). Figure 2 shows the distribution of the variability indices for the FSRQs and the BL Lac objects. The BL Lac objects in the datum set are found to be less variable on the average than the FSRQs. Recent observations of flares in BL Lac object, however, change some of these conclusions. For example, BL Lac was detected during a $ \gamma$-ray outburst with an average flux of $ (171\pm42)\times 10^{-8}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in July 1997 (Bloom et al. 1997). BL Lac would experience a eminent value of $ V$ in Table 1, if this data were accept into explanation. 

 Figure 3 shows a plot of the variability index as a function of the weighted average magnetic field for the blazars in Table 1. Note that the sources that have the highest average magnetic field all have high variability indices. merely 2 out of 18 blazars with average magnetic field less than $ 1\times 10^{-7}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ have a variability index greater than 2.5. In fact, there constitute no non - variable blazars in the sample that have eminent flux. 

 The study of short term unevenness in blazars is always limited by the small numbers of photons detect in the short time intervals at $ \gamma$-ray energies. The short time - plate variations detected for blazars with EGRET are for PKS 1622 - 297 (Mattox et al. 1997b) and 3C 279 (Wehrle et al. 1997). For both these objects the flux was found to increase by a gene of two or more in less than 8 hours. Other objects that have shown flux variations over the period of a few days are 3C 279
 fapl in the range of unceruain variability. Nr shound be hoted thxt, although the criterion usxd hwre ti gauge variability of a blazar is someqhat qrbitrary, mf does ixovids a wcy to compare thg numbers obdained. Also, as MzLcughlin et al. (1996) have noted, changing trese crotfria by 20% yieldf sikylar gewults. If the FSRQs and the BL Lac oboects are consicered separately, it is foujd tjat 76% of the FSRQs ln the sampoe aww variable, wfile 16% are non-variable. Aimilarly, for the BL Lac objectr, 50% arz variable, qhule 21% are definively njn-variable. Ib shoulg be noyed that the lpw mntrunsic luminosity of BN Lac objects coulq bias obvexvations (see discussiinw in §5.2). Figgre 2 whods uhe djstribktikn of the bariability indices for the FSTQf and the BL Lzc objqces. The BL Lac objects in the data set age fkund to be less variablw on the average than the FSRQf. Recent observations of flares in BL Lac objects, howetef, midlfy rimf of these conclusions. For example, BL Lac was seuecned during a $\gammc$-ray outburst wiyh am average flux of $(171\pm42)\cjmss 10^{-8}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ ij July 1997 (Bloon et al. 1997). FL Lsc would have a high value if $V$ in Tablv 1, id this information were taken intp accpunt.

Figure 3 shows a ploc of tge variabillty index xs a function of thv wehghted average flux for thq blazars in Cable 1. Nute jhat thq sources hhat mdve the highest avfrage fnuxes all jave high variability indices. Oiky 2 out of 18 nldzags with arerage flux less thwn $1\times 10^{-7}$ photpns cm$^{-2}$ f$^{-1}$ havd a variabplity indxx greater tran 2.5. In fact, djere are no ion-variabje boazaes in tfd sample that nave high flux.

The srudy of short term vatizbility in blazcxs is always limiyed by tje sidll numbers mf pfotums degected in tme rhory time intervals at $\cammz$-ray energies. The xhjrtest tume-scale variations drtected for blazard witi EGREV are gor PKS 1622-297 (Mattox et al. 1997b) and 3C 279 (Wegrle et ap. 1997). Nor both thesq obmectf the flux was found to increase by a factor of txo or more in less than 8 hours. Other objecjs uhat have shoxn fluv variatimns over the period if a few days are 3C 279
fall in the range of uncertain variability. be that, although criterion used here blazar somewhat arbitrary, it provide a way compare the numbers obtained. Also, as et al. (1996) have noted, changing these criteria by 20% yields similar results. the FSRQs and the BL Lac objects are considered separately, it is found 76% the in sample are variable, while 16% are non-variable. Similarly, for the BL Lac objects, 50% are variable, 21% are definitely non-variable. It should be noted the low intrinsic luminosity BL Lac objects could bias (see in §5.2). 2 the of the variability for the FSRQs and the BL Lac objects. The BL Lac objects in the data set are to be on the than FSRQs. observations of flares Lac objects, however, modify some of example, BL Lac was detected during a $\gamma$-ray with an flux of $(171\pm42)\times 10^{-8}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ in July 1997 (Bloom et al. 1997). BL would have a high value of $V$ in Table 1, if this information were taken Figure 3 shows a of the variability as function the average flux the blazars in Table 1. Note that the sources that have highest average fluxes all have high variability indices. Only 2 18 with average flux than $1\times 10^{-7}$ photons s$^{-1}$ a variability index greater In there blazars the that have high flux. study of short term variability blazars is always limited photons detected in the short time intervals at energies. The shortest time-scale variations detected for with EGRET are for PKS 1622-297 (Mattox et al. 1997b) and 3C (Wehrle et For both these objects the flux was found increase by a factor two or more in less than 8 hours. Other that shown flux over the period a few days 3C 279
 fall in the range of uncertain VariabilitY. It shOulD be NoTed tHat, aLthough the critERion Used here to gauge variabiLity oF a BLazaR Is SomewHat arbiTRaRY, It dOeS pRovIdE A wAy to cOmpAre the nUmbers obtaIneD. ALso, as McLaughLIn Et al. (1996) have noTed, Changing thesE crIteria By 20% YieLDs simIlaR resuLts. If tHE FSRQs And the BL LAc OBjects ARe consiDEReD sepArately, it is found tHAt 76% OF the FSRQs in the Sample ArE VaRIAblE, whIle 16% are non-vArIable. sImilarlY, FoR THE BL lAc objects, 50% are vAriable, whilE 21% Are DefiniTeLy nON-variaBle. It ShOUld Be noted that The lOw intrinsIc lumiNOsity of bl Lac objEcts coUld BiaS obsERvAtIonS (sEE diSCuSsiONs iN §5.2). Figure 2 sHoWs The diStriBUTIOn of The VariAbiliTy indices for tHe FsRQs ANd tHe BL LAc objEcts. thE BL LaC objecTs in tHe Data set are found To be Less variaBle On The AvErage THan the fSRqs. REcent obServatiONs oF fLAREs In BL Lac objects, howeVeR, MOdIfy some oF these COnClUSions. For ExAmpLe, BL lAC was dEtecTEd During a $\gAmma$-raY OuTbUrst witH aN averaGe FluX of $(171\Pm42)\timES 10^{-8}$ phoTons cm$^{-2}$ S$^{-1}$ in July 1997 (BLoom eT Al. 1997). BL Lac would haVE a high value of $v$ In tABlE 1, If thIs iNformation wEre tAKen iNto aCCoUnt.

fIgure 3 Shows A pLOt OF the variability indeX aS a funcTion oF the weighted aVerage flux FOR The blazaRs in tAbLE 1. Note that the soUrces That have thE Highest aVeragE fluxes aLl have higH VAriabiliTy iNdiCes. onlY 2 OUt Of 18 blazars with AVEragE fLux less ThaN $1\times 10^{-7}$ pHotOns Cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ HavE a VariabiliTy index gReAtEr ThAn 2.5. IN fact, THere are nO nOn-vArIabLe blaZArs in tHe samPle tHaT hAVe hIgh flux.

tHe STUdy oF sHoRt teRm vArIabilIty iN BlaZars is aLways limiTed BY the SmAlL numberS of photons detEcTed in the shOrT tiMe inteRVAls at $\gamMa$-ray energies. The shortesT Time-scaLe vAriatIons Detected fOr bLazars WitH eGRET aRe for PkS 1622-297 (MatToX et AL. 1997B) and 3C 279 (wEHrLe eT aL. 1997). For both thESE obJects ThE fluX was fouNd to increase by a facTOr oF two or more in lEss Than 8 HOUrS. OtHEr OBjeCtS ThaT HAve shown flux varIations oveR tHE pEriod of a feW DayS aRe 3C 279
 fall in the range of unce rtain vari abili ty.  It  s houl d be  noted that, a l thou gh the criterion usedhereto gaug e  v ariab ility o f  a b laz ar  i s s om e wh at ar bit rary, i t does pro vid ea way to com p ar e the numb ers  obtained. A lso , as M cL aug h lin e t a l. (1 996) h a ve not ed, chang in g  these criteri a by  20%  yields similar r e su l ts. If the FSR Qs and  t h eB L  La c o bjects are  c onsid e red sep a ra t e l y,i t is found th at 76% of t h e F SRQs i nthe sample  areva r iab le, while 1 6% a re non-va riable .  Simila r ly, for  the B L L acobje c ts ,50%  a r e v a ri abl e , w hile 21%  a re  defi nite l y n on-v ari able . Itshould be not edthat the  lowintri nsic  l umino sity o f BLLa c objects could  bia s observa tio ns  (s ee  disc u ssions  in  §5 .2). Fi gure 2s how st h e  d istribution of the  v a r ia bility i ndices fo rt he FSRQs  a ndtheB L  Lacobje c ts . The BL  Lac o b je ct s in th edata s et  ar e f oundt o be  lessvariable  on t h e average than the FSRQs. Re c en t ob s erva tio ns of flare s in BL L ac o b je cts ,  howe ver,mo d if y  some of these conc lu sions.  Forexample, BL L ac was det e c t ed durin g a$ \g a mma$-ray outbu rst w ith an ave r age flux  of $ (171\pm4 2)\times1 0 ^{-8}$ p hot ons  cm $^{ - 2 }$  s$^{-1}$ inJ u ly 1 99 7 (Bloo m e t al. 1 997 ).BLLac  w ould have  a highva lu eof  $V $ inT able 1,if  th is  in forma t ion we re ta kenin to acc ount.
F ig u r e 3sh ow s aplo tof th e va r iab ility i ndex as a  fu n ctio nof  the we ighted averag eflux for t he  bl azarsi n  Table 1 . Note that the sources that ha vethe h ighe st averag e f luxesall have h igh va riabi li tyi n dices . On ly2out of 18b l aza rs wi th  ave rage fl ux less than $1\ti m es10^{-7}$ phot ons  cm$ ^ { -2 }$s $^ { -1} $h ave a  variability in dex greate rt ha n 2.5. Inf act ,there a re no n on-va r iable b lazars in  the samp le  tha t hav e high flu x.

Thestudy ofs hortt er m var iab ilityin  bl azars  is al w ays  limi ted by  t he sma ll nu mb ers of p hotons detected in theshorttimeint ervals at  $\ g amm a$-ray en ergi es. The sh ort est  time -sc a le va riat i on s d e tecte d fo r  blazarsw it h E G R ET  are for PK S 1 622 -297(Ma t tox et  al.  1997b) and 3C 27 9  (Wehrle et al . 19 9 7 ).For both  t hese objects t hefl u x  was fou nd  to increas e by a f ac t or of  two o r more  in les s th a n 8 ho urs.  Ot her objec tsth a t havesh ow n  fluxvari at ions o ver th e  per i o d of a few daysare 3 C 279
 fall_in the_range of uncertain variability._It should_be_noted that,_although_the criterion used_here to gauge_variability of a blazar_is somewhat arbitrary,_it_does provide a way to compare the numbers obtained. Also, as McLaughlin et al._(1996)_have noted,_changing_these_criteria by 20% yields similar_results. If the FSRQs and_the BL_Lac objects are considered separately, it is found_that_76% of the_FSRQs in the sample are variable, while 16% are_non-variable. Similarly, for the BL Lac_objects, 50% are_variable,_while_21% are definitely non-variable._It should be noted that the_low intrinsic luminosity of BL Lac_objects could bias observations (see discussions in_§5.2). Figure 2 shows the distribution_of the variability indices for_the FSRQs_and the BL Lac objects._The BL Lac_objects in_the data set_are found to be less variable_on the average_than the FSRQs. Recent observations of_flares_in BL Lac_objects,_however,_modify some_of these conclusions._For_example, BL_Lac_was detected during a $\gamma$-ray outburst_with_an average flux of $(171\pm42)\times 10^{-8}$ photons_cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in July_1997_(Bloom et al. 1997)._BL Lac would have a_high value of $V$ in Table_1, if_this information_were taken into account.

Figure 3 shows a plot of the variability_index as a function of the_weighted average flux for_the blazars_in_Table 1. Note_that_the sources_that have the highest average fluxes all_have high_variability indices. Only 2 out of_18 blazars with average_flux_less than $1\times 10^{-7}$ photons cm$^{-2}$_s$^{-1}$ have a variability index greater_than 2.5. In fact, there_are_no_non-variable blazars in the sample_that have high flux.

The study of_short term variability_in blazars is always limited by the_small_numbers of photons detected in the_short_time intervals at $\gamma$-ray energies. The_shortest_time-scale_variations detected for blazars with_EGRET are for PKS 1622-297 (Mattox_et al. 1997b) and 3C 279 (Wehrle et al._1997). For both_these objects the flux was_found_to_increase by a factor of two or more in less_than 8_hours. Other objects_that have shown flux variations over the period of a_few days are 3C 279