_Q$ as a consequence of the vanishing of $f_{V_1}(1)$ in the $m_Q\to\infty$ limit, as it was shown for $s_1^{(1)}$ after Eq. (\[schematic\]).)

The order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ terms proportional to $\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$ are very significant for the $D_1$ decay rate. The decay rate into $D_2^*$ does not receive a similarly large enhancement from order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ terms proportional to $\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$. The coefficients $s_2^{(n)}$ and $t_2^{(n)}$ are independent of $\bar\Lambda'$ and $\bar\Lambda$ to the order displayed in Eq. (\[stuD2\]).

The values of $s_1^{(0)}$ and $t_1^{(0)}$ are known to order $\Lambda_{\rm
QCD}^2/m_Q^2$, and $s_1^{(1)}$ and $u_1^{(0)}$ are known to order $\Lambda_{\rm
QCD}/m_Q$. At order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, the only unknowns in $t_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(0)}$, $t_2^{(0)}$ are the $\hat\eta_i$ functions that parameterize corrections to the HQET Lagrangian. The remaining coefficients in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) and (\[stuD2\]) (i.e., $s_1^{(2)}$, $t_1^{(2)}$, $u_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(1)}$, $t_2^{(1)}$, $u_2^{(0)}$) are known in the infinite mass limit in terms of $\hat\tau'(1)$, the slope of the $m_Q\to\infty$ Isgur-Wise function at zero recoil. At order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, these six coefficients depend on the unknown subleading $\tau_i$ and $\eta_i$ functions.

The values of $\tau'$, $\eta_i^{(Q)}$ and $\tau_{1,2}$ that occur in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) and (\[stuD2\]) are not known ($\tau_i$ only appears in the terms replaced by ellips
_ Q$ as a consequence of the vanishing of $ f_{V_1}(1)$ in the $ m_Q\to\infty$ limit, as it was shown for $ s_1^{(1)}$ after Eq.   (\[schematic\ ]) .) 

 The order $ \Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ terms proportional to $ \bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$ are very meaning for the $ D_1 $ decay pace. The decay pace into $ D_2^*$ does not receive a similarly large enhancement from order $ \Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ term proportional to $ \bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$. The coefficients $ s_2^{(n)}$ and $ t_2^{(n)}$ are independent of $ \bar\Lambda'$ and $ \bar\Lambda$ to the order expose in Eq.   (\[stuD2\ ]). 

 The values of $ s_1^{(0)}$ and $ t_1^{(0)}$ are known to regulate $ \Lambda_{\rm 
 QCD}^2 / m_Q^2 $, and $ s_1^{(1)}$ and $ u_1^{(0)}$ are known to order $ \Lambda_{\rm 
 QCD}/m_Q$. At club $ \Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, the only unknowns in $ t_1^{(1)}$, $ s_2^{(0)}$, $ t_2^{(0)}$ are the $ \hat\eta_i$ affair that parameterize correction to the HQET Lagrangian. The remaining coefficients in Eqs.   (\[stuD1\ ]) and (\[stuD2\ ]) (i.e., $ s_1^{(2)}$, $ t_1^{(2)}$, $ u_1^{(1)}$, $ s_2^{(1)}$, $ t_2^{(1)}$, $ u_2^{(0)}$) are known in the infinite mass terminus ad quem in terms of $ \hat\tau'(1)$, the slope of the $ m_Q\to\infty$ Isgur - Wise function at zero recoil. At orderliness $ \Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, these six coefficients depend on the nameless subleading $ \tau_i$ and $ \eta_i$ functions. 

 The value of $ \tau'$, $ \eta_i^{(Q)}$ and $ \tau_{1,2}$ that occur in Eqs.   (\[stuD1\ ]) and (\[stuD2\ ]) are not known ($ \tau_i$ only appears in the terms replace by ellips
_Q$ ad a consequence of the vxnishing of $f_{V_1}(1)$ nb the $k_Q\to\inrty$ limig, as it was shown for $s_1^{(1)}$ aftec Eq. (\[wchemqtic\]).)

The order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ tegms propoetioial to $\bar\Lambda'-\uzr\Lambda$ are bcry sngiificant for thg $D_1$ decay rade. The decay rdtd nnto $D_2^*$ does not receive a similarly jarge emhwncement from jrdeg $\Jambsa_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ terms proportional to $\bzr\Lambde'-\bar\Lambda$. The voefficients $s_2^{(n)}$ and $t_2^{(n)}$ are indfpendent of $\bar\Lamhda'$ and $\bar\Oambqq$ to the orddr displaytd in Eq. (\[stuD2\]).

Jhe values of $s_1^{(0)}$ and $t_1^{(0)}$ are known go orber $\Lambda_{\rn
QXD}^2/m_E^2$, and $s_1^{(1)}$ and $n_1^{(0)}$ are hnown to ordcg $\Lambdd_{\rm
QCD}/m_A$. At order $\Lamnda_{\rm QCE}/m_Q$, the only unknowns in $t_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(0)}$, $t_2^{(0)}$ are the $\rat\eta_i$ fgnetions that parameteruzw cortectimns gi tfe GQXT Magranhiai. The remaihing coeffixients in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) amd (\[wtuD2\]) (i.e., $s_1^{(2)}$, $t_1^{(2)}$, $u_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(1)}$, $t_2^{(1)}$, $u_2^{(0)}$) awe known in the infinite mass limit in uerms of $\hat\tau'(1)$, the slope of the $m_Q\to\infty$ Isgur-Wlse functyon at zero recoil. At order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, these vix ckdffnglentr dfpend on the unknown subleading $\tau_i$ and $\eta_i$ rumcnions.

The values on $\tau'$, $\eta_i^{(Q)}$ and $\tai_{1,2}$ hhsj occur in Eqs. (\[rtuD1\]) aus (\[atuD2\]) are not known ($\tau_i$ ogly appears in the terms replaced by ellips
_Q$ as a consequence of the vanishing in $m_Q\to\infty$ limit, it was shown The $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ terms to $\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$ are significant for the $D_1$ decay rate. decay rate into $D_2^*$ does not receive a similarly large enhancement from order QCD}/m_Q$ terms proportional to $\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$. The coefficients $s_2^{(n)}$ and $t_2^{(n)}$ are independent of and to order in Eq. (\[stuD2\]). The values of $s_1^{(0)}$ and $t_1^{(0)}$ are known to order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2/m_Q^2$, and and $u_1^{(0)}$ are known to order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$. order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, the unknowns in $t_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(0)}$, $t_2^{(0)}$ the functions that corrections the Lagrangian. The remaining in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) and (\[stuD2\]) (i.e., $s_1^{(2)}$, $t_1^{(2)}$, $u_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(1)}$, $t_2^{(1)}$, $u_2^{(0)}$) are known in the infinite limit in $\hat\tau'(1)$, the of $m_Q\to\infty$ function at zero order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, these six coefficients unknown subleading $\tau_i$ and $\eta_i$ functions. The values $\tau'$, $\eta_i^{(Q)}$ $\tau_{1,2}$ that occur in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) (\[stuD2\]) are not known ($\tau_i$ only appears in terms replaced by ellips
_Q$ as a consequence of the vanisHing of $f_{V_1}(1)$ in The $m_Q\To\iNftY$ lImit, As it Was shown for $s_1^{(1)}$ afTEr Eq. (\[Schematic\]).)

The order $\LambdA_{\rm QCd}/m_q$ TermS PrOportIonal to $\BAr\lAMbdA'-\bAr\lamBdA$ ArE very SigNificanT for the $D_1$ deCay RaTe. The decay raTE iNto $D_2^*$ does noT reCeive a similaRly Large eNhAncEMent fRom Order $\lambda_{\RM QCD}/m_Q$ Terms propOrTIonal tO $\Bar\LambDA'-\BaR\LamBda$. The coefficientS $S_2^{(n)}$ ANd $t_2^{(n)}$ are indepenDent of $\BaR\laMBDa'$ aNd $\bAr\Lambda$ to ThE ordeR DisplayED iN eQ. (\[Stud2\]).

the values of $s_1^{(0)}$ aNd $t_1^{(0)}$ are known TO orDer $\LamBdA_{\rm
qcD}^2/m_Q^2$, anD $s_1^{(1)}$ and $U_1^{(0)}$ aRE knOwn to order $\LAmbdA_{\rm
QCD}/m_Q$. AT order $\lAmbda_{\rm qcD}/m_Q$, the Only unKnoWns In $t_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(0)}$, $T_2^{(0)}$ ArE tHe $\hAt\ETa_i$ FUnCtiONs tHat paramEtErIze coRrecTIONS to tHe HqET LAgranGian. The remainIng CoefFIciEnts iN Eqs. (\[sTuD1\]) aNd (\[StuD2\]) (i.E., $s_1^{(2)}$, $t_1^{(2)}$, $u_1^{(1)}$, $s_2^{(1)}$, $t_2^{(1)}$, $U_2^{(0)}$) are kNoWn in the infinite Mass Limit in teRms Of $\Hat\TaU'(1)$, the sLOpe of tHe $m_q\to\Infty$ IsGur-Wise FUncTiON AT zEro recoil. At order $\LaMbDA_{\Rm qCD}/m_Q$, theSe six cOEfFiCIents depEnD on The uNKNown sUbleADiNg $\tau_i$ anD $\eta_i$ fUNcTiOns.

The vAlUes of $\tAu'$, $\Eta_I^{(Q)}$ aNd $\tau_{1,2}$ THat oCcur in eqs. (\[stuD1\]) aNd (\[stud2\]) Are not known ($\tau_I$ Only appears in THe TERmS ReplAceD by ellips
_Q$ as a consequence of th e vanishin g of$f_ {V_ 1} (1)$  inthe $m_Q\to\in f ty$limit, as it was shown  for$s _ 1^{( 1 )} $ aft er Eq.( \[ s c hem at ic \]) .) 
T he or der  $\Lamb da_{\rm QC D}/ m_ Q$ terms pro p or tional to$\b ar\Lambda'-\ bar \Lambd a$  ar e  very  si gnifi cant f o r the$D_1$ dec ay rate.T he deca y ra te i nto $D_2^*$ doesn ot receive a simi larlyla r ge e nha nce ment fromor der $ \ Lambda_ { \r m Q CD} / m_Q$ terms pr oportionalt o $ \bar\L am bda ' -\bar\ Lambd a$ .  Th e coefficie nts$s_2^{(n) }$ and $t_2^{( n )}$ are  indep end ent  of$ \b ar \La mb d a'$ an d $ \ bar \Lambda$  t othe o rder d i s play edin E q. (\ [stuD2\]).

T hevalu e s o f $s_ 1^{(0 )}$an d $t_ 1^{(0) }$ ar eknown to order$\La mbda_{\rm 
QC D} ^2/ m_ Q^2$, and $s _1^ {(1 )}$ and  $u_1^{ ( 0)} $a r e  k nown to order $\La mb d a _{ \rm
QCD} /m_Q$. At  o r der $\La mb da_ {\rm Q CD}/m _Q$, th e only u nknown s  i n$t_1^{( 1) }$, $s _2 ^{( 0)} $, $t _ 2^{( 0)}$ a re the $ \hat\ e ta_i$ function s  that paramet e ri z e  c o rrec tio ns to the H QETL agra ngia n .The remai ningco e ff i cients in Eqs. (\[s tu D1\])and ( \[stuD2\]) (i .e., $s_1^ { ( 2 )}$, $t_ 1^{( 2 )} $ , $u_1^{(1)}$,  $s_2 ^{(1)}$, $ t _2^{(1)} $, $u _2^{(0)} $) are kn o w n in the  in fin ite  ma s s  l imit in terms o f $\ ha t\tau'( 1)$ , the s lop e o f t he$m _Q\to\inf ty$ Isgu r- Wi se  f unc tiona t zero r ec oil .Atorder $\Lamb da_{\ rm Q CD }/ m _Q$ , these si x coef fi ci ents  de pe nd on  the unk nown su bleading$\t a u_i$  a nd  $\eta_ i$ functions. 
The values  o f $ \tau'$ , $\eta_i^ {(Q)}$ and $\tau_{1,2}$ that oc cur  in E qs.(\[stuD1\ ])and (\ [st u D2\])are no t kno wn  ($ \ t au_i$ o nl y a pp ears in th e ter ms re pl aced  by ell ips
_Q$ as_a consequence_of the vanishing of_$f_{V_1}(1)$ in_the_$m_Q\to\infty$ limit,_as_it was shown_for $s_1^{(1)}$ after_Eq. (\[schematic\]).)

The order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$_terms proportional to_$\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$_are very significant for the $D_1$ decay rate. The decay rate into $D_2^*$ does_not_receive a_similarly_large_enhancement from order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$_terms proportional to $\bar\Lambda'-\bar\Lambda$. The_coefficients $s_2^{(n)}$_and $t_2^{(n)}$ are independent of $\bar\Lambda'$ and $\bar\Lambda$_to_the order displayed_in Eq. (\[stuD2\]).

The values of $s_1^{(0)}$ and $t_1^{(0)}$ are known_to order $\Lambda_{\rm
QCD}^2/m_Q^2$, and $s_1^{(1)}$ and_$u_1^{(0)}$ are known_to_order_$\Lambda_{\rm
QCD}/m_Q$. At order $\Lambda_{\rm_QCD}/m_Q$, the only unknowns in $t_1^{(1)}$,_$s_2^{(0)}$, $t_2^{(0)}$ are the $\hat\eta_i$ functions_that parameterize corrections to the HQET Lagrangian._The remaining coefficients in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) and_(\[stuD2\]) (i.e., $s_1^{(2)}$, $t_1^{(2)}$, $u_1^{(1)}$,_$s_2^{(1)}$, $t_2^{(1)}$,_$u_2^{(0)}$) are known in the_infinite mass limit_in terms_of $\hat\tau'(1)$, the_slope of the $m_Q\to\infty$ Isgur-Wise function_at zero recoil._At order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$, these six_coefficients_depend on the_unknown_subleading_$\tau_i$ and_$\eta_i$ functions.

The values_of_$\tau'$, $\eta_i^{(Q)}$_and_$\tau_{1,2}$ that occur in Eqs. (\[stuD1\]) and_(\[stuD2\])_are not known ($\tau_i$ only appears in_the terms replaced by_ellips