 the true distribution. Not all combinations of these parameters can be investigated in detail. We will study some specific Monte Carlo examples to derive a stopping criterion and then test it with further distributions. It will be shown that a general prescription works reasonably well for all studied examples.

The unfolded histogram is compared to the input histogram. In all examples we take care that the estimates of the elements of the response matrix have negligible statistical uncertainties. If not stated differently, the iteration starts with a uniform distribution as a first guess for the true distribution. The observed histogram has, with two exceptions, $40$ bins and the unfolded histogram usually comprises $20$ bins. With the standard settings the value of $\chi_{0}^{2}$ should be compatible with the $\chi^{2}$ distribution with $20$ degrees of freedom because we have $40$ measurements and $20$ estimated parameters.

### Example 1: Two peaks {#example-1-two-peaks.unnumbered}

We start with a two-peak distribution, a superposition of two normal distributions $N(x|0.3;0.10)$, $N(x|0.75;0.08)$ and a uniform distribution $U(x)$ in the interval $0<x<1$. Here $N(x|\mu;\sigma$) is the normal distribution of $x$ with the mean value $\mu$ and the standard deviation $\sigma$. The number of events attributed to the three distributions is $25,000$, $15,000$ and $10,000$, respectively. The experimental distribution is observed with a Gaussian resolution $\sigma=0.07.$ It is of the same order as the width of the peaks. Events are accepted in the interval $0<x,x^{\prime}<1$.

In Fig. \[iter2b2040\] unfolding results for different values of the number of iterations are shown. The shaded histograms (input histograms) correspond to the observation with an ideal detector and are close to the true histogram. The left top plot displays the observed histogram as squares. With increasing number of iterations the unfolded histogram (squares) quickly approaches the true histogram. The agreement is quite good in a wide range of the number of iterations. It deteriorates slowly when increasing the number of iterations beyond $32$. At $1000$ iterations oscillations are visible and after $100,000$ iterations the sequence has approached the maximum likelihood solution with strong fluctuations and no explicit regularization. We find $\chi_{0}%
^{
the true distribution. Not all combinations of these parameters can be investigated in contingent. We will analyze some specific Monte Carlo examples to derive a stop standard and then test it with further distributions. It will be shown that a cosmopolitan prescription drug works reasonably well for all studied examples. 

 The unfolded histogram is compared to the stimulation histogram. In all examples we take caution that the estimates of the elements of the response matrix have negligible statistical uncertainties. If not state differently, the iteration starts with a uniform distribution as a first guess for the on-key distribution. The observed histogram has, with two exceptions, $ 40 $ bins and the unfolded histogram usually consist $ 20 $ bins. With the standard settings the value of $ \chi_{0}^{2}$ should be compatible with the $ \chi^{2}$ distribution with $ 20 $ degrees of freedom because we have $ 40 $ measurement and $ 20 $ estimated parameters. 

 # # # Example 1: Two peaks { # example-1-two-peaks.unnumbered } 

 We start with a two - peak distribution, a principle of superposition of two normal distribution $ N(x|0.3;0.10)$, $ N(x|0.75;0.08)$ and a uniform distribution $ U(x)$ in the interval $ 0 < x<1$. Here $ N(x|\mu;\sigma$) is the normal distribution of $ x$ with the mean value $ \mu$ and the standard deviation $ \sigma$. The number of events attributed to the three distributions is $ 25,000 $, $ 15,000 $ and $ 10,000 $, respectively. The experimental distribution is observed with a Gaussian resolving power $ \sigma=0.07.$ It is of the same order as the width of the bill. Events are accepted in the interval $ 0 < x, x^{\prime}<1$. 

 In Fig. \[iter2b2040\ ] unfolding result for different values of the number of iterations are indicate. The shaded histograms (input histograms) correspond to the observation with an ideal detector and are close to the dependable histogram. The left top plot displays the observed histogram as squares. With increase number of iteration the unfolded histogram (squares) quickly approaches the true histogram. The agreement is quite effective in a wide range of the number of iteration. It deteriorates slowly when increasing the number of iteration beyond $ 32$. At $ 1000 $ iterations oscillations are visible and after $ 100,000 $ iteration the sequence has approach the maximum likelihood solution with hard fluctuations and no denotative regularization. We find $ \chi_{0}% 
 ^ {
 thf true distribution. Not xll combinations of thxse parzmeters zan be investigated in detaip. Qe wiol study some specific Monte Caglo exampoes uo derive a stoppmhg critcxion zkd thzn test it with nurther disdributions. It fiul be shown that a general prescriptijn workx geasonably welj fog wll anubied examples.

The unfolded histofram is compared to yhe input histogram. In all exalples we take care that the ewtimwres of the euements of the responsg matrix have negligible statistkcal bncertaintigs. Iv not stated diffvrently, the ibvration starts with a unifork dmstrubution as a first guxss for the true disjribution. Dhz observed histogram yaw, witv twm exzwptkona, $40$ bjns anf tie unfolded histogram ysually comprises $20$ nigw. With the stzndard sqttings the value of $\chi_{0}^{2}$ should be compdtigle with the $\chi^{2}$ distrivution with $20$ degrees lf freedoi because we have $40$ measurements and $20$ estimated pasametxrr.

### Erqmple 1: Tao peaks {#example-1-two-peaks.unnumbered}

We start wieg s nwo-peak distributlon, a superpositiom lf jwo normal disjributions $N(x|0.3;0.10)$, $N(x|0.75;0.08)$ and a unifogm disttibutiin $U(x)$ in uhe imterval $0<x<1$. Here $N(x|\mu;\sigma$) is the normal bisrribution of $x$ witk the mean vclue $\mo$ and yhe standard deviation $\rigmz$. The numbeg of evenfr attributed to ghe tvree disufibutions is $25,000$, $15,000$ anq $10,000$, respecvivelv. The exoerikental distributlon is observed with a Gwussicn revolution $\slgma=0.07.$ It is of the same order as the width of jhe pedks. Evencs are accepted in ehe interval $0<x,r^{\prime}<1$.

In Fig. \[kter2b2040\] unfomding rxsults for dyfferent valuad of the numuer of itqratuons are shudn. The shaded nistograms (input hiwtograms) corresponv to fhe observation wiuh an ideal detevtof agd ace cljve to the trge hkstubram. Ghe lefu tio plpt displays the obsesved histogram as squatef. With ibcreasind number of iyerations the unfopded iistogcam (sqiargs) quickly approaches the true gistogram. Thc agreement if qulte dood in a cide range of the number of iterations. Iv deteriorates slowly wyen increasing the uukber of itecationf beyond $32$. At $1000$ iterations osciolations are visinle and after $100,000$ iteratikns tha seqkence has approached the maximum likelihood solution with strong fluctuatuons aid no explicif rebularpzaciou. We figd $\cii_{0}%
^{
the true distribution. Not all combinations of can investigated in We will study to a stopping criterion then test it further distributions. It will be shown a general prescription works reasonably well for all studied examples. The unfolded histogram compared to the input histogram. In all examples we take care that the of elements the matrix have negligible statistical uncertainties. If not stated differently, the iteration starts with a uniform distribution a first guess for the true distribution. The histogram has, with two $40$ bins and the unfolded usually $20$ bins. the settings value of $\chi_{0}^{2}$ be compatible with the $\chi^{2}$ distribution with $20$ degrees of freedom because we have $40$ measurements and estimated parameters. 1: Two {#example-1-two-peaks.unnumbered} start a two-peak distribution, of two normal distributions $N(x|0.3;0.10)$, $N(x|0.75;0.08)$ distribution $U(x)$ in the interval $0<x<1$. Here $N(x|\mu;\sigma$) the normal of $x$ with the mean value and the standard deviation $\sigma$. The number of attributed to the three distributions is $25,000$, $15,000$ and $10,000$, respectively. The experimental distribution is a Gaussian resolution $\sigma=0.07.$ is of the order the of peaks. Events accepted in the interval $0<x,x^{\prime}<1$. In Fig. \[iter2b2040\] unfolding results for values of the number of iterations are shown. The shaded histograms) to the observation an ideal detector and close the true histogram. The plot the squares. increasing of iterations the unfolded (squares) quickly approaches the true The agreement is quite of the number of iterations. It deteriorates slowly increasing the number of iterations beyond $32$. $1000$ iterations oscillations are visible and after $100,000$ iterations the sequence has the maximum with strong fluctuations and no explicit regularization. We $\chi_{0}% ^{
 the true distribution. Not all CombinatioNs of tHesE paRaMeteRs caN be investigateD In deTail. We will study some speCific moNTe CaRLo ExampLes to deRIvE A StoPpInG crItERiOn and TheN test it With furtheR diStRibutions. It wILl Be shown thaT a gEneral prescrIptIon worKs ReaSOnablY weLl for All stuDIed exaMples.

The uNfOLded hiSTogram iS COmPareD to the input histogRAm. iN all examples we Take caRe THaT THe eStiMates of the ElEmentS Of the reSPoNSE MatRIx have negligiBle statistiCAl uNcertaInTieS. if not sTated DiFFerEntly, the iteRatiOn starts wIth a unIForm disTRibutioN as a fiRst GueSs foR ThE tRue DiSTriBUtIon. tHe oBserved hIsToGram hAs, wiTH TWO excEptIons, $40$ Bins aNd the unfolded HisTogrAM usUally ComprIses $20$ BiNs. WitH the stAndarD sEttings the value Of $\chI_{0}^{2}$ should be ComPaTibLe With tHE $\chi^{2}$ diStrIbuTion witH $20$ degreeS Of fReEDOM bEcause we have $40$ measurEmENTs And $20$ estimAted paRAmEtERs.

### ExamplE 1: TWo pEaks {#EXAmple-1-Two-pEAkS.unnumbeRed}

We sTArT wIth a two-PeAk distRiButIon, A supeRPosiTion of Two normaL distRIbutions $N(x|0.3;0.10)$, $N(x|0.75;0.08)$ anD A uniform distrIBuTIOn $u(X)$ in tHe iNterval $0<x<1$. HerE $N(x|\mU;\SigmA$) is tHE nOrmAL distRibutIoN Of $X$ With the mean value $\mu$ aNd The staNdard Deviation $\sigmA$. The number OF EVents attRibuTEd TO the three distrIbutiOns is $25,000$, $15,000$ and $10,000$, reSPectivelY. The eXperimenTal distriBUTion is obSerVed WitH a GAUSsIan resolution $\SIGma=0.07.$ IT iS of the sAme Order as The WidTh oF thE pEaks. EventS are accePtEd In ThE inTervaL $0<X,x^{\prime}<1$.

IN FIg. \[iTeR2b2040\] uNfoldINg resuLts foR difFeReNT vaLues of tHE nUMBer oF iTeRatiOns ArE showN. The SHadEd histoGrams (inpuT hiSTogrAmS) cOrrespoNd to the observAtIon with an iDeAl dEtectoR ANd are cloSe to the true histogram. The LEft top pLot DisplAys tHe observeD hiStograM as SQuares. with inCreasInG nuMBEr of iTERaTioNs The unfoldeD HIstOgram (SqUareS) quicklY approaches the true HIstOgram. The agreeMenT is qUITe GooD In A WidE rANge OF The number of iterAtions. It deTeRIoRates slowlY WheN iNcreasiNg the nuMber oF IteratiOns beyond $32$. at $1000$ iteratiOnS oscILLatIons are visIble and aFter $100,000$ iteraTIons tHE sEquenCe hAs apprOaCheD the mAximum LIkeLihooD solutIoN with sTrong FlUctuatioNs and no explicit regulariZation. we finD $\chI_{0}%
^{
 the true distribution. No t all comb inati ons  of  t hese  par ameters can be inve stigated in detail. We  will  s t udys om e spe cific M o nt e Car lo  e xam pl e sto de riv e a sto pping crit eri on  and then te s tit with fu rth er distribut ion s. Itwi llb e sho wnthata gene r al pre scription  w o rks re a sonably w el l fo r all studied exa m pl e s.

The unfold ed his to g ra m iscom pared to t he  inpu t  histog r am . I n a l l examples we  take caret hat  the e st ima t es ofthe e le m ent s of the re spon se matrix  haven egligib l e stati stical  un cer tain t ie s.  If  n o t s t at edd iff erently,  t he  iter atio n s t arts  wi th a  unif orm distribut ion  asa  fi rst g uessforth e tru e dist ribut io n. The observed  his togram ha s,wi thtw o exc e ptions , $ 40$  bins a nd theu nfo ld e d hi stogram usually co mp r i se s $20$ b ins. W i th  t h e standa rd  se ttin g s  thevalu e  o f $\chi_ {0}^{2 } $sh ould be  c ompati bl e w ith  the$ \chi ^{2}$distribu tionw ith $20$ degre e s of freedomb ec a u se we h ave  $40$ measu reme n ts a nd $ 2 0$  es t imate d par am e te r s.

### Example 1:Tw o peak s {#e xample-1-two- peaks.unnu m b e red}

We  sta r tw ith a two-peak  dist ribution,a  superpo sitio n of two  normal d i s tributio ns$N( x|0 .3; 0 . 10 )$, $N(x|0.75 ; 0 .08) $and a u nif orm dis tri but ion  $U (x )$ in the  interva l$0 <x <1 $.Here$ N(x|\mu; \s igm a$ ) i s the normal  dist ribu ti on of$x$ wit h  t h e  mea nva lue$\m u$  andthes tan dard de viation $ \si g ma$.  T he  number  of events at tr ibuted toth e t hree d i s tributio ns is $25,000$, $15,000 $  and $1 0,0 00$,resp ectively.  Th e expe rim e ntal d istrib ution  i s o b s erved w it h a  G aussian re s o lut ion $ \s igma =0.07.$  It is of the same ord er as the wid thof t h e  p eak s .E ven ts are a ccepted in theinterval $ 0< x ,x ^{\prime}< 1 $.
I n Fig.\[iter2 b2040 \ ] unfol ding resu lts for d if fere n t  va lues of th e number  of itera t ionsa re  show n.The sh ad edhisto grams( inp ut hi stogra ms ) corr espon dto the o bservation with an idea l dete ctorand  are clos e t o  th e true hi stog ram. The l eft  to p plo t d i splay s th e  o bse r ved h isto g ram as sq u ar es. W it h increasin g n umb er of  it e ration s th e unfolded histog r am (squares) q uick l y  ap pro a ches  t he true histog ram .T h e agreem en t is quitegood inaw ide r ange o f thenumbero f  i t eratio ns.Itdeteriora tes  s l owly wh en  i n creasi ng t he  numbe r of i t erat i o ns beyond $32$.At $1 0 0 0$ it e rat ionsos cillati o ns a re visible  and after$100,0 00$itera tions t he  seque nce  h as approac h ed the ma ximum  likeli ho od s olu tion w iths t rongfluc tu ati ons and n o ex p li ci t  re gula rizat io n. W e find $\ c hi_{0}%^{
 the_true distribution._Not all combinations of_these parameters_can_be investigated_in_detail. We will_study some specific_Monte Carlo examples to_derive a stopping_criterion_and then test it with further distributions. It will be shown that a general_prescription_works reasonably_well_for_all studied examples.

The unfolded histogram_is compared to the input_histogram. In_all examples we take care that the estimates_of_the elements of_the response matrix have negligible statistical uncertainties. If not_stated differently, the iteration starts with_a uniform distribution_as_a_first guess for the_true distribution. The observed histogram has,_with two exceptions, $40$ bins and_the unfolded histogram usually comprises $20$ bins._With the standard settings the value_of $\chi_{0}^{2}$ should be compatible_with the_$\chi^{2}$ distribution with $20$ degrees_of freedom because_we have_$40$ measurements and_$20$ estimated parameters.

### Example 1: Two_peaks {#example-1-two-peaks.unnumbered}

We start_with a two-peak distribution, a superposition_of_two normal distributions_$N(x|0.3;0.10)$,_$N(x|0.75;0.08)$_and a_uniform distribution $U(x)$_in_the interval_$0<x<1$._Here $N(x|\mu;\sigma$) is the normal distribution_of_$x$ with the mean value $\mu$ and_the standard deviation $\sigma$._The_number of events attributed_to the three distributions is_$25,000$, $15,000$ and $10,000$, respectively. The_experimental distribution_is observed_with a Gaussian resolution $\sigma=0.07.$ It is of the same order_as the width of the peaks._Events are accepted in_the interval_$0<x,x^{\prime}<1$.

In_Fig. \[iter2b2040\] unfolding_results_for different_values of the number of iterations are_shown. The_shaded histograms (input histograms) correspond to_the observation with an_ideal_detector and are close to the_true histogram. The left top plot_displays the observed histogram as_squares._With_increasing number of iterations the_unfolded histogram (squares) quickly approaches the_true histogram. The_agreement is quite good in a wide_range_of the number of iterations. It_deteriorates_slowly when increasing the number of_iterations_beyond_$32$. At $1000$ iterations oscillations_are visible and after $100,000$ iterations_the sequence has approached the maximum likelihood solution with_strong fluctuations and_no explicit regularization. We find_$\chi_{0}%
^{