 uniquely characterized by seven parameters: (1) an overall source intensity or normalization, $S$, which can be thought of as the flux leaving unit surface area of the neutron star. (2) neutron star compactness, $\beta = 
M/R$, where $M$ and $R$ are the stellar mass and radius, respectively, (3) initial angular size of the spot (half of the subtended angle), $\alpha_0$, (4) angular growth rate of the hot spot, $\dot\alpha$, (5) initial rotational phase, $\delta_0$, (6) latitude of the spot center, $\theta_s$, measured from the rotational equator, and (7) latitude of the observers line of sight, $\theta_{obs}$, also measured from the rotational equator. One of our primary goals is to determine an upper bound on the compactness. To do this within the context of our model we set the hot spot latitude and observation latitude to zero. That is, both the hot spots and the line of sight to the observer are centered on the rotational equator. This geometry produces the largest possible modulation amplitude. Since any observed modulation must be equal to or less than this limit, and since the modulation amplitude decreases with increasing compactness, the upper limit follows. For completeness, we also investigate the influence of moving the hot spot and the line of sight off the rotational equator. The geometry of our model is illustrated in Figure 1. Related hot spot models have been worked out by Pechenick, Ftaclas, & Cohen (1983) and Strohmayer (1992).

Method of Calculation
=====================

The geometry of a photon trajectory in relation to the observers line of sight $\vec r_{obs}$ is shown in Figure 1. The figure is drawn with $\theta_s =
\theta_{obs} = 0$. For any single point on the hot spot with radius vector $\vec r$, the path of a photon reaching the observer lies in the plane of $\vec r$ and $\vec r_{obs}$, and is asymptotically parallel to $\vec r_{obs}$ with impact parameter $b$. The two angles, $\phi$ (between $\vec r$ and $\vec r_{obs}$) and $\psi$ (the emission angle with respect to the surface normal), complete the description. For non-zero $\theta_s$ and $\theta_{obs}$, the deflection geometry remains the same, only the plane in which the desired trajectory lies
uniquely characterized by seven parameters: (1) an overall source intensity or standardization, $ S$, which can be think of as the flux leaving unit of measurement airfoil area of the neutron star. (2) neutron star compactness, $ \beta = 
 M / R$, where $ M$ and $ R$ are the leading mass and radius, respectively, (3) initial angular size of the spot (one-half of the subtend angle), $ \alpha_0 $, (4) angular growth pace of the hot spot, $ \dot\alpha$, (5) initial rotational phase, $ \delta_0 $, (6) latitude of the spotlight plaza, $ \theta_s$, measured from the rotational equator, and (7) latitude of the observers line of sight, $ \theta_{obs}$, also measure from the rotational equator. One of our primary goals is to determine an upper adhere on the compactness. To do this within the context of our model we set the blistering spot latitude and notice latitude to zero. That is, both the hot spots and the line of sight to the perceiver are centered on the rotational equator. This geometry produces the largest possible modulation amplitude. Since any observed modulation must be equal to or less than this limit, and since the modulation amplitude decreases with increasing compactness, the upper limit follows. For completeness, we also investigate the influence of moving the blistering topographic point and the line of batch off the rotational equator. The geometry of our exemplar is illustrated in Figure 1. Related hot blot models have been worked out by Pechenick, Ftaclas, & Cohen (1983) and Strohmayer (1992). 

 Method of Calculation 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The geometry of a photon trajectory in relation to the observers lineage of sight $ \vec r_{obs}$ is shown in Figure 1. The figure is drawn with $ \theta_s = 
 \theta_{obs } = 0$. For any single point on the blistering spot with radius vector $ \vec r$, the path of a photon reaching the observer lies in the plane of $ \vec r$ and $ \vec r_{obs}$, and is asymptotically parallel to $ \vec r_{obs}$ with impingement parameter $ b$. The two angles, $ \phi$ (between $ \vec r$ and $ \vec r_{obs}$) and $ \psi$ (the emission angle with respect to the open normal), complete the description. For non - zero $ \theta_s$ and $ \theta_{obs}$, the deflection geometry remains the like, only the airplane in which the desired trajectory lies
 unlquely characterized by reven parameters: (1) an oterall aource ivtensity or normalization, $S$, xhicy can be thought of as the wlux leavpng unit wurfece area of the isutron star. (2) hcutrou wtar compactnexs, $\beta = 
M/S$, where $M$ and $S$ xrz the stellar mass and radius, respeceively, (3) ijitial angular sizt os ths spot (half of the subtended angle), $\alpha_0$, (4) angular growyh rate of the hot spot, $\doh\alpja$, (5) initial rotatilnal phase, $\eeltw_0$, (6) latitude ow the spot center, $\thetz_s$, measured from the rotational equacor, and (7) lajnrudf of the obsxrvers line of sigmn, $\theta_{mbs}$, alsp measured frok tie ritational equator. One of our primary gowls is to dztermine an upper boubd on tve cmmpazrners. Uo vo fhis wlthmn the contsxt of our nodel we set the hou s[it latitude ahd obsqrdation latitude to zero. That is, both tht hot spots and the line of wight to the observer are centqred on the rotational equator. This geometry prodgces vhd lcvnest podsible modulation amplitude. Since any observeq mpdllation must be ezual to or keds jhan this limij, and snhcs the modulation alplitudg decrwases witr invreasing compactness, the upper limit fojoows. For completenzss, we also nnvestogate the influence of moviny the got spot anf the lins of sight off thd rptdtional tduator. The geometwy of our modzl is iluusttated ig Figure 1. Gelatcg hot spot models jave yeen forked out by Pechenick, Ftaclas, & Cohen (1983) aiv Strohmayer (1992).

Kedhog of Caleulatipn
=====================

The geometrr of a photon jrajectorv in rdlation to the obververs linq of sight $\vew r_{obs}$ is shoxn in Figtre 1. The figure ks drawn with $\yheta_s =
\thvtc_{obs} = 0$. Foe any single point on fhe hot spot wick tqdius vector $\vrc f$, tre peth os a photon redchivg gne obrerver lies kn tne plane of $\vec r$ ang $\ved r_{obs}$, and is asymltjtically parallej to $\vec r_{obs}$ with impact paramtter $b$. Thx two sngjes, $\phi$ (between $\vec r$ and $\vec d_{obs}$) and $\osi$ (the emissiog annle rith respeet to the surface normal), complete the dewcription. For non-eero $\theta_s$ and $\theta_{pns}$, the deflertion deometry semains the same, onlt the plane in whlch the desired trajecfory lhes
uniquely characterized by seven parameters: (1) an intensity normalization, $S$, can be thought unit area of the star. (2) neutron compactness, $\beta = M/R$, where $M$ $R$ are the stellar mass and radius, respectively, (3) initial angular size of spot (half of the subtended angle), $\alpha_0$, (4) angular growth rate of the spot, (5) rotational $\delta_0$, (6) latitude of the spot center, $\theta_s$, measured from the rotational equator, and (7) latitude the observers line of sight, $\theta_{obs}$, also measured the rotational equator. One our primary goals is to an bound on compactness. do within the context our model we set the hot spot latitude and observation latitude to zero. That is, both the spots and of sight the are on the rotational geometry produces the largest possible modulation observed modulation must be equal to or less this limit, since the modulation amplitude decreases with compactness, the upper limit follows. For completeness, we investigate the influence of moving the hot spot and the line of sight off the The geometry of our is illustrated in 1. hot models been worked by Pechenick, Ftaclas, & Cohen (1983) and Strohmayer (1992). Method of ===================== The geometry of a photon trajectory in relation to line sight $\vec r_{obs}$ shown in Figure 1. figure drawn with $\theta_s = 0$. any the spot radius vector $\vec r$, path of a photon reaching observer lies in the $\vec r_{obs}$, and is asymptotically parallel to $\vec with impact parameter $b$. The two angles, (between $\vec r$ and $\vec r_{obs}$) and $\psi$ (the emission angle with to the complete the description. For non-zero $\theta_s$ and $\theta_{obs}$, deflection geometry remains the only the plane in which the desired trajectory lies
 uniquely characterized by seVen parametErs: (1) an OveRalL sOurcE intEnsity or normalIZatiOn, $S$, which can be thought of As the FlUX leaVInG unit Surface AReA OF thE nEuTroN sTAr. (2) NeutrOn sTar compActness, $\betA = 
M/R$, WhEre $M$ and $R$ are tHE sTellar mass And Radius, respecTivEly, (3) iniTiAl aNGular SizE of thE spot (hALf of thE subtendeD aNGle), $\alpHA_0$, (4) angulaR GRoWth rAte of the hot spot, $\doT\AlPHa$, (5) initial rotatIonal pHaSE, $\dELTa_0$, (6) lAtiTude of the sPoT centER, $\theta_s$, MEaSUREd fROm the rotationAl equator, anD (7) LatItude oF tHe oBServerS line Of SIghT, $\theta_{obs}$, alSo meAsured froM the roTAtional EQuator. ONe of ouR prImaRy goALs Is To dEtERmiNE aN upPEr bOund on thE cOmPactnEss. TO DO THis wIthIn thE contExt of our model We sEt thE Hot Spot lAtituDe anD oBservAtion lAtituDe To zero. That is, botH the Hot spots aNd tHe LinE oF sighT To the oBseRveR are cenTered on THe rOtATIOnAl equator. This geomeTrY PRoDuces the LargesT PoSsIBle modulAtIon AmplITUde. SiNce aNY oBserved mOdulatIOn MuSt be equAl To or leSs ThaN thIs limIT, and Since tHe modulaTion aMPlitude decreasES with increasiNG cOMPaCTnesS, thE upper limit FollOWs. FoR comPLeTenESs, we aLso inVeSTiGAte the influence of moViNg the hOt spoT and the line of Sight off thE ROTational EquaTOr. tHe geometry of ouR modeL is illustrATed in FigUre 1. ReLated hot Spot modelS HAve been wOrkEd oUt bY PeCHEnIck, Ftaclas, & CohEN (1983) And STrOhmayer (1992).

metHod of CaLcuLatIon
=====================

the GeOmetry of a Photon trAjEcToRy In rElatiON to the obSeRveRs LinE of siGHt $\vec r_{Obs}$ is ShowN iN FIGurE 1. The figURe IS DrawN wItH $\theTa_s =
\ThEta_{obS} = 0$. For ANy sIngle poInt on the hOt sPOt wiTh RaDius vecTor $\vec r$, the patH oF a photon reAcHinG the obSERver lies In the plane of $\vec r$ and $\vec r_{OBs}$, and is AsyMptotIcalLy paralleL to $\Vec r_{obS}$ wiTH impacT paramEter $b$. thE twO ANgles, $\PHI$ (bEtwEeN $\vec r$ and $\veC R_{Obs}$) And $\psI$ (tHe emIssion aNgle with respect to tHE suRface normal), coMplEte tHE DeScrIPtIOn. FOr NOn-zERO $\theta_s$ and $\theta_{Obs}$, the deflEcTIoN geometry rEMaiNs The same, Only the Plane IN which tHe desired TrajectorY lIes
 uniquely characterized by  seven par amete rs:  (1 )an o vera ll source inte n sity  or normalization, $S$ , whi ch canb ethoug ht of a s  t h e  fl ux  l eav in g  u nit s urf ace are a of the n eut ro n star. (2)n eu tron starcom pactness, $\ bet a = 
M /R $,w here$M$  and$R$ ar e  the s tellar ma ss and ra d ius, re s p ec tive ly, (3) initial a n gu l ar size of the  spot(h a lf o f t hesubtendedan gle), $\alpha _ 0$ , ( 4)a ngular growth  rate of th e  ho t spot ,$\d o t\alph a$, ( 5) ini tial rotati onal  phase, $ \delta _ 0$, (6) latitud e of t hespo t ce n te r,  $\ th e ta_ s $,  me a sur ed fromth erotat iona l e q uato r,and(7) l atitude of th e o bser v ers  line  of s ight ,$\the ta_{ob s}$,al so measured fro m th e rotatio nal  e qua to r. On e  of ou r p rim ary goa ls is t o  de te r m i ne  an upper bound on  t h e  c ompactne ss. To do  t h is withi nthe  con t e xt of  our mo del we s et the ho tspot la ti tude a nd  ob ser vatio n  lat itudeto zero.  That is, both the h o t spots and t h el i ne of s igh t to the ob serv e r ar e ce n te red on th e rot at i on a l equator. This geo me try pr oduce s the largest  possiblem o d ulationampl i tu d e. Since any o bserv ed modulat i on mustbe eq ual to o r less th a n  this li mit , a ndsin c e  t he modulation a mpli tu de decr eas es with  in cre asi ngco mpactness , the up pe rli mi t f ollow s . For co mp let en ess , wea lso in vesti gate  t he inf luenceo fm o ving  t he  hot  sp ot  andthel ine  of sig ht off th e r o tati on al  equato r. The geomet ry  of our mo de l i s illu s t rated in  Figure 1. Related hots pot mod els  have  bee n workedout  by Pe che n ick, F taclas , & C oh en( 1 983)a n dStr oh mayer (199 2 ) .
Metho dof C alculat ion
============== = === ===

The geom etr y of a  p hot o nt raj ec t ory i n relation to t he observe rs li ne of sigh t  $\ ve c r_{ob s}$ isshown in Figu re 1. The  figure i sdraw n wit h $\theta_ s =
\the ta_{obs}=  0$.F or  anysin gle po in t o n the  hot s p otwithradius  v ector$\vec  r $, the p ath of a photon reachin g theobser ver  lies inthe pla ne of $\v ec r $ and $\ve c r _{o bs}$,  an d  is a symp t ot ica l ly pa rall e l to $\ve c  r _{o b s }$  with impac t p ara meter  $b $ . Thetwoangles, $\phi$ (b e tween $\vec r$  and $ \ve c r _ {obs }$ ) and $\psi$ ( the  e m i ssion an gl e with resp ect to t he surfa ce nor mal),complet e th e  descr ipti on.  For non- zer o$ \theta_ s$  a n d $\th eta_ {o bs}$,the de f lect i o n geometry remai ns th e same, onl y the  p lane in whic h the desi red traject ory li es
 uniquely_characterized by_seven parameters: (1) an_overall source_intensity_or normalization,_$S$,_which can be_thought of as_the flux leaving unit_surface area of_the_neutron star. (2) neutron star compactness, $\beta = 
M/R$, where $M$ and $R$ are_the_stellar mass_and_radius,_respectively, (3) initial angular size_of the spot (half of_the subtended_angle), $\alpha_0$, (4) angular growth rate of the_hot_spot, $\dot\alpha$, (5)_initial rotational phase, $\delta_0$, (6) latitude of the spot_center, $\theta_s$, measured from the rotational_equator, and (7)_latitude_of_the observers line of_sight, $\theta_{obs}$, also measured from the_rotational equator. One of our primary_goals is to determine an upper bound_on the compactness. To do this_within the context of our_model we_set the hot spot latitude_and observation latitude_to zero._That is, both_the hot spots and the line_of sight to_the observer are centered on the_rotational_equator. This geometry_produces_the_largest possible_modulation amplitude. Since_any_observed modulation_must_be equal to or less than_this_limit, and since the modulation amplitude decreases_with increasing compactness, the_upper_limit follows. For completeness,_we also investigate the influence_of moving the hot spot and_the line_of sight_off the rotational equator. The geometry of our model is illustrated_in Figure 1. Related hot spot_models have been worked_out by_Pechenick,_Ftaclas, & Cohen_(1983)_and Strohmayer_(1992).

Method of Calculation
=====================

The geometry of a photon_trajectory in_relation to the observers line of_sight $\vec r_{obs}$ is_shown_in Figure 1. The figure is_drawn with $\theta_s =
\theta_{obs} = 0$._For any single point on_the_hot_spot with radius vector $\vec_r$, the path of a photon_reaching the observer_lies in the plane of $\vec r$_and_$\vec r_{obs}$, and is asymptotically parallel_to_$\vec r_{obs}$ with impact parameter $b$._The_two_angles, $\phi$ (between $\vec r$_and $\vec r_{obs}$) and $\psi$ (the_emission angle with respect to the surface normal), complete_the description. For_non-zero $\theta_s$ and $\theta_{obs}$, the_deflection_geometry_remains the same, only the plane in which the desired_trajectory lies