 antiparallel to those of $\theta_{B_1}$ and $\theta_{B_2}$. These magnetic orderings are in fair agreement with the experimental observation.[@CoMn2O4-ang]

![For the six compounds, simulated and experimental[@ACr2O4-pol; @CoMn2O4-exp; @New-Exp] hysteresis curve. The simulated data is calculated with set-2 interactions parameters. []{data-label="fig2"}](Fig2)

![image](Fig3)

For $FeCr_2O_4$, the $\hat{J}_{BB}/\hat{J}_{AB}$ is nearly 1.02 for set-1 which reduce to 0.71 for set-2. This decreases the geometrical frustration and therefore the cone angle at $B$-site decreases. This in turn increase the magnetization along the positive z-direction. This also helps to uplift the magnetization curve and removes the magnetic compensation. It is to be noted that the calculated polarisation ($\overrightarrow{P}$) and $T_s$ falls in the reasonable range.

Compounds having no conical order: $CoMn_2O_4$ and $CoFe_2O_4$
--------------------------------------------------------------

From Table \[table1\], the first principles calculated exchange interaction in $CoMn_2O_4$ has a strong anisotropy because it crystallizes in a tetragonal structure whereas all the other compounds are cubic. Due to stretching along the z-direction and compression in the $xy$ plane, $\hat{J}_{BB}$ in the $xy$ plane becomes much stronger and those out of a plane turn weaker. In Table 1, (I) and (O) refers to in-plane and out of plane interaction respectively. Therefore at very low temperatures, all the spins lie in the $xy$ plane and as temperature crosses $T_c$, they get completely randomized. In Figure \[fig1\], the calculated magnetization is plotted along with the experimental curve. For $CoFe_2O_4$, the ground state is collinear which corroborates with the fact that $\hat{J}_{AB}$ is much stronger than $\hat{J}_{BB}$. Interestingly, because this compound crystallizes in inverse spinel structure, which is not the case for the other five compounds, $Fe$ sits at both $A$-site and $B$-site with antiparallel alignment. This cancels out the magnetization from $Fe
antiparallel to those of $ \theta_{B_1}$ and $ \theta_{B_2}$. These magnetic orderings are in fair agreement with the experimental observation.[@CoMn2O4 - ang ] 

! [ For the six compounds, fake and experimental[@ACr2O4 - pol; @CoMn2O4 - exp; @New - Exp ] hysteresis curvature. The simulated data is account with set-2 interaction parameters. [ ] { data - label="fig2"}](Fig2) 

! [ image](Fig3) 

 For $ FeCr_2O_4 $, the $ \hat{J}_{BB}/\hat{J}_{AB}$ is nearly 1.02 for set-1 which abridge to 0.71 for set-2. This decrease the geometrical frustration and consequently the cone slant at $ B$-site decreases. This in turn increase the magnetization along the positivist z - direction. This also avail to uplift the magnetization curve and removes the magnetic compensation. It is to be note that the calculated polarisation ($ \overrightarrow{P}$) and $ T_s$ falls in the fair range. 

 Compounds hold no conic order: $ CoMn_2O_4 $ and $ CoFe_2O_4 $ 
 -------------------------------------------------------------- 

 From Table \[table1\ ], the first principles calculated exchange interaction in $ CoMn_2O_4 $ has a potent anisotropy because it crystallizes in a tetragonal structure whereas all the other compounds are cubic. Due to stretching along the omega - guidance and compression in the $ xy$ plane, $ \hat{J}_{BB}$ in the $ xy$ plane becomes much stronger and those out of a plane turn weaker. In mesa 1, (I) and (O) refers to in - airplane and out of airplane interaction respectively. Therefore at very low temperatures, all the spins dwell in the $ xy$ plane and as temperature crosses $ T_c$, they get completely randomized. In Figure \[fig1\ ], the deliberate magnetization is plotted along with the experimental curve. For $ CoFe_2O_4 $, the ground state is collinear which corroborates with the fact that $ \hat{J}_{AB}$ is much stronger than $ \hat{J}_{BB}$. Interestingly, because this compound crystallizes in inverse spinel structure, which is not the case for the other five compounds, $ Fe$ sit at both $ A$ -site and $ B$-site with antiparallel alliance. This cancels out the magnetization from $ Fe
 anhiparallel to those of $\tmeta_{B_1}$ and $\theta_{B_2}$. These kagnetjc orderkngs are in fair agreement wmth rhe ezperimental observatiov.[@CoMn2O4-ang]

![Vor the wix rompounds, simulavsd and crperijcntal[@CCc2O4-pol; @CoMn2O4-exp; @Kew-Exp] hystaresis curve. Tve snmulated data is calculated with set-2 interavtlons parameterf. []{daua-lwbel="rpg2"}](Nig2)

![image](Fig3)

For $FeCr_2O_4$, the $\hat{J}_{BB}/\hzt{J}_{AB}$ iv nearly 1.02 for set-1 which reduce to 0.71 for det-2. Hhis decreases the geometricao frtwtration and therefore the cone anfle at $B$-site decreases. This in gurn nncrease thg jahtetization elong nhe positive d-cirecthon. Thix also helps tp u'lifr the magnetization cnrve and removes the magnetic ckmpensation. It is ti be toteg thxr tfe dakchlated pomarisation ($\overrightaerow{P}$) and $T_s$ falls on nne reasonabls rangq.

Cjmpounds having no conical order: $CoMn_2O_4$ dnd $CoFe_2O_4$
--------------------------------------------------------------

From Table \[table1\], rhe first principles falculateq exchange interaction in $CoMn_2O_4$ has a strong anismtropb ceccmfd ih crystallizes in a tetragonal structure wherqzs akl the other cjmpounds arr funyc. Due to strgtching alkng the z-direction and coipreswion in tre $xu$ plane, $\hat{J}_{BB}$ in the $xy$ plqne becomes iych stronger and tkose out of c plang turn weaker. In Table 1, (I) and (O) rsfers to in-olane and uut of plane intdrabtiot respecukvely. Therefore ae very lox tem'eraturer, alk the fpins lie ln thc $xy$ plane and as tfmpercture crosses $T_f$, they get completely randomizev. In Figure \[fog1\], thv calculaced mannetization is [lotted along cith the expefimental clrve. For $RoFe_2O_4$, the grjund state is follinear whmch corroforares qith thd fact that $\hat{K}_{AB}$ is mubh stringer than $\hat{J}_{BB}$. Lntergsfingly, because ckiw compound crysyaluizqs ii invqsse spinel sdrucgurd, whicf is nou tme zase for the other five wompkunds, $Fe$ sits at bptm $A$-site abd $B$-site with antiparsllel alignment. Thls caicels uut tne iagnetization from $Fe
antiparallel to those of $\theta_{B_1}$ and $\theta_{B_2}$. orderings in fair with the experimental simulated experimental[@ACr2O4-pol; @CoMn2O4-exp; @New-Exp] curve. The simulated is calculated with set-2 interactions parameters. ![image](Fig3) For $FeCr_2O_4$, the $\hat{J}_{BB}/\hat{J}_{AB}$ is nearly 1.02 for set-1 which reduce to for set-2. This decreases the geometrical frustration and therefore the cone angle at decreases. in increase magnetization along the positive z-direction. This also helps to uplift the magnetization curve and removes the compensation. It is to be noted that the polarisation ($\overrightarrow{P}$) and $T_s$ in the reasonable range. Compounds no order: $CoMn_2O_4$ $CoFe_2O_4$ From \[table1\], the first calculated exchange interaction in $CoMn_2O_4$ has a strong anisotropy because it crystallizes in a tetragonal structure whereas the other cubic. Due stretching the and compression in plane, $\hat{J}_{BB}$ in the $xy$ plane and those out of a plane turn weaker. Table 1, and (O) refers to in-plane and of plane interaction respectively. Therefore at very low all the spins lie in the $xy$ plane and as temperature crosses $T_c$, they get In Figure \[fig1\], the magnetization is plotted with experimental For the ground is collinear which corroborates with the fact that $\hat{J}_{AB}$ is much than $\hat{J}_{BB}$. Interestingly, because this compound crystallizes in inverse spinel is the case for other five compounds, $Fe$ at $A$-site and $B$-site with This out $Fe
 antiparallel to those of $\thetA_{B_1}$ and $\theta_{b_2}$. ThesE maGneTiC ordErinGs are in fair agrEEmenT with the experimental obServaTiON.[@CoMN2o4-aNg]

![For The six cOMpOUNds, SiMuLatEd ANd ExperImeNtal[@ACr2o4-pol; @CoMn2O4-eXp; @NEw-exp] hysteresiS CuRve. The simuLatEd data is calcUlaTed witH sEt-2 iNTeracTioNs parAmeterS. []{Data-laBel="fig2"}](Fig2)

![ImAGe](Fig3)

FOR $FeCr_2O_4$, tHE $\HaT{J}_{BB}/\Hat{J}_{AB}$ is nearly 1.02 for SEt-1 WHich reduce to 0.71 foR set-2. ThIs DEcREAseS thE geometricAl FrustRAtion anD ThEREForE The cone angle aT $B$-site decreASes. this in TuRn iNCrease The maGnETizAtion along tHe poSitive z-diRectioN. this alsO Helps to Uplift The MagNetiZAtIoN cuRvE And REmOveS The Magnetic CoMpEnsatIon. IT IS TO be nOteD thaT the cAlculated polaRisAtioN ($\OveRrighTarroW{P}$) anD $T_S$ fallS in the ReasoNaBle range.

CompounDs haVing no conIcaL oRdeR: $COMn_2O_4$ aND $CoFe_2O_4$
--------------------------------------------------------------

froM TaBle \[tablE1\], the firST prInCIPLeS calculated exchangE iNTErAction in $coMn_2O_4$ hAS a StROng anisoTrOpy BecaUSE it crYstaLLiZes in a teTragonAL sTrUcture wHeReas alL tHe oTheR compOUnds Are cubIc. Due to sTretcHIng along the z-diREction and compREsSIOn IN the $Xy$ pLane, $\hat{J}_{BB}$ iN the $XY$ plaNe beCOmEs mUCh strOnger AnD ThOSe out of a plane turn weAkEr. In TaBle 1, (I) aNd (O) refers to in-Plane and ouT OF Plane intEracTIoN Respectively. ThErefoRe at very loW TemperatUres, aLl the spiNs lie in thE $XY$ plane anD as TemPerAtuRE CrOsses $T_c$, they geT COmplEtEly randOmiZed. In FiGurE \[fiG1\], thE caLcUlated magNetizatiOn Is PlOtTed Along WIth the exPeRimEnTal Curve. fOr $CoFe_2o_4$, the gRounD sTaTE is CollineAR wHICh coRrObOratEs wItH the fAct tHAt $\hAt{J}_{AB}$ is Much stronGer THan $\hAt{j}_{Bb}$. IntereStingly, becausE tHis compounD cRysTallizES In inversE spinel structure, which is NOt the caSe fOr the OtheR five compOunDs, $Fe$ siTs aT Both $A$-sIte and $b$-site WiTh aNTIparaLLEl AliGnMent. This caNCEls Out thE mAgneTizatioN from $Fe
 antiparallel to those of$\theta_{B _1}$and  $\ th eta_ {B_2 }$. These magn e ticorderings are in fairagree me n t wi t hthe e xperime n ta l obs er va tio n. [ @C oMn2O 4-a ng]

![ For the si x c om pounds, simu l at ed and exp eri mental[@ACr2 O4- pol; @ Co Mn2 O 4-exp ; @ New-E xp] hy s teresi s curve.Th e  simul a ted dat a is  cal culated with set- 2  i n teractions par ameter s. [] { d ata -la bel="fig2" }] (Fig2 ) 

![ima g e] ( F i g3) 
For $FeCr_2O _4$, the $\ h at{ J}_{BB }/ \ha t {J}_{A B}$ i sn ear ly 1.02 for  set -1 whichreduce to 0.71 for set -2. Th isdec reas e sth e g eo m etr i ca l f r ust ration a nd  t heref oret h e cone  an gleat $B $-site decrea ses . Th i s i n tur n inc reas ethe m agneti zatio nalong the posit ivez-directi on.  T his  a lso h e lps to  up lif t the m agnetiz a tio nc u r ve  and removes the m ag n e ti c compen sation .  I ti s to beno ted  tha t the c alcu l at ed polar isatio n  ( $\ overrig ht arrow{ P} $)and  $T_s $  fal ls inthe reas onabl e  range.

Compo u nds having no co n i ca l  ord er:  $CoMn_2O_4 $ an d  $Co Fe_2 O _4 $
- - ----- ----- -- - -- - ------------------- -- ------ ----- ------------
From Tabl e \ [table1\ ], t h ef irst principle s cal culated ex c hange in terac tion in$CoMn_2O_ 4 $  has a s tro ngani sot r o py  because it c r y stal li zes ina t etragon alstr uct ure  w hereas al l the ot he rco mp oun ds ar e  cubic.Du e t ostr etchi n g alon g the  z-d ir ec t ion  and co m pr e s sion  i nthe$xy $plane , $\ h at{ J}_{BB} $ in the$xy $  pla ne  b ecomesmuch stronger  a nd those o ut  of  a pla n e  turn we aker. In Table 1, (I) a n d (O) r efe rs to  in- plane and  ou t of p lan e  inter action  resp ec tiv e l y. Th e r ef ore  a t very low t emp eratu re s, a ll thespins lie in the $ x y$plane and astem pera t u re  cr o ss e s $ T_ c $,t h ey get complete ly randomi ze d .In Figure\ [fi g1 \], the  calcul atedm agnetiz ation isplotted a lo ng w i t h t he experim ental cu rve. For$ CoFe_ 2 O_ 4$, t heground  s tat e iscollin e arwhich  corro bo rateswithth e fact t hat $\hat{J}_{AB}$ is m uch st ronge r t han $\hat {J} _ {BB }$. Inter esti ngly, beca use  th is co mpo u nd cr ysta l li zes in in vers e  spinel s t ru ctu r e ,which is no t t hecasefor the ot herfive compounds, $ F e$ sits at bot h $A $ - sit e a n d $B $- site with anti par al l e l alignm en t. This can cels out  t h e mag netiza tion f rom $Fe 
 antiparallel_to those_of $\theta_{B_1}$ and $\theta_{B_2}$._These magnetic_orderings_are in_fair_agreement with the_experimental observation.[@CoMn2O4-ang]

![For the_six compounds, simulated and_experimental[@ACr2O4-pol; @CoMn2O4-exp; @New-Exp]_hysteresis_curve. The simulated data is calculated with set-2 interactions parameters. []{data-label="fig2"}](Fig2)

![image](Fig3)

For $FeCr_2O_4$, the $\hat{J}_{BB}/\hat{J}_{AB}$_is_nearly 1.02_for_set-1_which reduce to 0.71 for_set-2. This decreases the geometrical_frustration and_therefore the cone angle at $B$-site decreases. This_in_turn increase the_magnetization along the positive z-direction. This also helps to_uplift the magnetization curve and removes_the magnetic compensation._It_is_to be noted that_the calculated polarisation ($\overrightarrow{P}$) and $T_s$_falls in the reasonable range.

Compounds having_no conical order: $CoMn_2O_4$ and $CoFe_2O_4$
--------------------------------------------------------------

From Table_\[table1\], the first principles calculated exchange_interaction in $CoMn_2O_4$ has a_strong anisotropy_because it crystallizes in a_tetragonal structure whereas_all the_other compounds are_cubic. Due to stretching along the_z-direction and compression_in the $xy$ plane, $\hat{J}_{BB}$ in_the_$xy$ plane becomes_much_stronger_and those_out of a_plane_turn weaker._In_Table 1, (I) and (O) refers_to_in-plane and out of plane interaction respectively._Therefore at very low_temperatures,_all the spins lie_in the $xy$ plane and_as temperature crosses $T_c$, they get_completely randomized._In Figure_\[fig1\], the calculated magnetization is plotted along with the experimental curve._For $CoFe_2O_4$, the ground state is_collinear which corroborates with_the fact_that_$\hat{J}_{AB}$ is much_stronger_than $\hat{J}_{BB}$._Interestingly, because this compound crystallizes in inverse_spinel structure,_which is not the case for_the other five compounds,_$Fe$_sits at both $A$-site and $B$-site_with antiparallel alignment. This cancels out_the magnetization from $Fe