 in numerical simulations (e.g., Semenov et al. 2016, see Fig. \[fig2\] in their paper). This value is a factor $\approx 10$ smaller than the average value measured on the scale of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Galaxy (Murray 2011). This is expected since the gas is denser and more gravitationally bound in GMCs than the spatially averaged gas densities on scales of 750 pc (as are the observations of NGC 628) or on entire galactic scales.

Fig. \[fig2\] displays the distribution function of the ratio of the theoretical to observational star formation rates $ \left({\rm SFR}_{th}/{\rm SFR}_{obs}\right)$. The dispersion in this distribution is $\approx 0.3$ dex. Fig. \[fig3\] displays the scatter plots in the $\Sigma_{g}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ space (left column) and in the $\Sigma_{*}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ space (right column). The observations are shown with the red open triangles, and the theoretical estimates are shown with the black open diamonds (top) and as a closed contours containing $68\%$ of the theoretical points (bottom). A noticeable aspect of Fig. \[fig3\] is that in the low surface density regime ($\Sigma_{g} \lesssim 10-15$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the model matches perfectly the data, both in terms of the dependence of $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ on $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$ and in terms of the level of dispersion at any given value of $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$. At higher surface densities ($\Sigma_{g} \gtrsim 15$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the theoretical estimates of $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ are larger than the observed ones by factors of $\approx 2-5$. It is important to note that our formalism does not account explicitly for the effects of feedback from massive stars, which are more important at higher surface densities where more massive clusters can form. The increased effect of feedback at high surface densities leads to a more rapid expulsion of the gas from the clusters and to a reduction of the star formation efficiency per unit time (Dib 2011a). Dib (2011a), showed that in the surface density regime relevant for this work ($1$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2} \lesssim \Sigma_{g} \lesssim 50$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the value of the
in numerical simulations (e.g., Semenov et al. 2016, see Fig.   \[fig2\ ] in their newspaper). This value is a agent $ \approx 10 $ smaller than the average value measured on the plate of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Galaxy (Murray 2011). This is expected since the gasoline is denser and more gravitationally bound in GMCs than the spatially averaged gasoline densities on scales of 750 personal computer (as are the observations of NGC 628) or on entire galactic scales. 

 Fig.   \[fig2\ ] expose the distribution function of the ratio of the theoretical to observational star formation rate $ \left({\rm SFR}_{th}/{\rm SFR}_{obs}\right)$. The dispersion in this distribution is $ \approx 0.3 $ dex. Fig.   \[fig3\ ] displays the scatter plots in the $ \Sigma_{g}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ quad (left column) and in the $ \Sigma_{*}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ space (right column). The observation are shown with the red open triangles, and the theoretical estimates are prove with the black open diamonds (top) and as a closed contour containing $ 68\%$ of the theoretical points (bottom). A noticeable aspect of Fig.   \[fig3\ ] is that in the low surface density regime ($ \Sigma_{g } \lesssim 10 - 15 $ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the model match perfectly the data, both in term of the addiction of $ \Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ on $ \Sigma_{g}$ and $ \Sigma_{*}$ and in term of the level of dispersion at any give value of $ \Sigma_{g}$ and $ \Sigma_{*}$. At higher surface densities ($ \Sigma_{g } \gtrsim 15 $ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the theoretical estimates of $ \Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ are large than the observed ones by factors of $ \approx 2 - 5$. It is important to note that our formalism does not account explicitly for the effect of feedback from massive stars, which are more important at higher surface density where more massive clusters can shape. The increased effect of feedback at high surface densities head to a more rapid expulsion of the gas from the clusters and to a decrease of the star geological formation efficiency per unit time (Dib 2011a). Dib (2011a), show that in the surface concentration regime relevant for this work ($ 1 $ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2 } \lesssim \Sigma_{g } \lesssim 50 $ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the value of the
 in numerical simulations (e.n., Semenov et al. 2016, see Fij. \[fig2\] in their pxper). This value is a factor $\epprix 10$ snaller than the averagd value mvasured ob tht scale of giant moleculav clohfs (GKRs) in the Galaxi (Murray 2011). Thhs is expected sknee the gas is denser and more gravitwtionalky bound in GMCs tham the spatially averaged gas densities kn scalts of 750 pc (as are tne observations of NGC 628) or on fntire galactic scwles.

Fig. \[fig2\] eispjqys the distfibution fluction of tge ratio of the theoretical to ubserrational stqr fogkation ratew $ \lest({\rm SFR}_{th}/{\rm SFR}_{obs}\rhght)$. Thr dispersion ik thiv dustribution is $\approx 0.3$ dex. Fig. \[fig3\] displwys the swacter plots in the $\Signa_{t}-\Sigmd_{\rm VFR}$ rpacd (ltft cklumn) wnd in the $\Sifma_{*}-\Sigma_{\rm WFR}$ space (right colimg). The observatjons awe shown with the red open triangles, and uhe tgeoretical estimates arw shown with the blacn open diwmonds (top) and as a closed contours containing $68\%$ ox the gheircticxo ooints (bottom). A noticeable aspect of Fig. \[fig3\] if tnan in the low surfcce density regike ($\Sodma_{g} \lesssim 10-15$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the model matches perfecjly thw data, bouh in terms of the dependence of $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ in $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigmc_{*}$ and in teros og the level of dispersion at any given valuf of $\Sigmz_{e}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$. At hkghvr sgrface dtvsities ($\Sigma_{g} \gtwsim 15$ M$_{\odit}$ pe$^{-2}$), the thdorejical eftimates ov $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ are larger than tve observef ones by factors of $\approx 2-5$. It is important jo totv that oux formslism does noe account explncitly fjr thd effects kf feeduack from mafsive stars, wvlch are more importagt ar hither sufwace densities where moge maswive clusters can norm. Jhs increased effzet of feedback at hieh fugfare degvities leads to x mute raoid expulsiiv of the gas from the clgsteds and to a reductook of the wtar foriation efficirncy per unit time (Dib 2011e). Dib (2011e), showrd jhat in the surface density regjme relevwnt for this wowk ($1$ N$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2} \lesxsim \Sigma_{g} \lesssim 50$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the value of the
in numerical simulations (e.g., Semenov et al. Fig. in their This value is than average value measured the scale of molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Galaxy 2011). This is expected since the gas is denser and more gravitationally bound GMCs than the spatially averaged gas densities on scales of 750 pc (as the of 628) on entire galactic scales. Fig. \[fig2\] displays the distribution function of the ratio of the theoretical observational star formation rates $ \left({\rm SFR}_{th}/{\rm SFR}_{obs}\right)$. dispersion in this distribution $\approx 0.3$ dex. Fig. \[fig3\] the plots in $\Sigma_{g}-\Sigma_{\rm space column) and in $\Sigma_{*}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ space (right column). The observations are shown with the red open triangles, and the theoretical are shown black open (top) as closed contours containing the theoretical points (bottom). A noticeable \[fig3\] is that in the low surface density ($\Sigma_{g} \lesssim M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the model matches perfectly data, both in terms of the dependence of SFR}$ on $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$ and in terms of the level of dispersion at any of $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$. higher surface densities \gtrsim M$_{\odot}$ the estimates of SFR}$ are larger than the observed ones by factors of $\approx It is important to note that our formalism does not for effects of feedback massive stars, which are important higher surface densities where clusters form. of at surface densities leads to more rapid expulsion of the from the clusters and star formation efficiency per unit time (Dib 2011a). (2011a), showed that in the surface density relevant for this work ($1$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2} \lesssim \Sigma_{g} \lesssim 50$ M$_{\odot}$ the value
 in numerical simulations (e.g., SEmenov et al. 2016, See FiG. \[fiG2\] in ThEir pAper). this value is a faCTor $\aPprox 10$ smaller than the aveRage vAlUE meaSUrEd on tHe scale OF gIANt mOlEcUlaR cLOuDs (GMCS) in The GalaXy (Murray 2011). ThIs iS eXpected since THe Gas is denseR anD more gravitaTioNally bOuNd iN gMCs tHan The spAtiallY AveragEd gas densItIEs on scALes of 750 pc (AS ArE the Observations of NGC 628) OR oN Entire galactic Scales.

fiG. \[FiG2\] DIspLayS the distriBuTion fUNction oF ThE RATio OF the theoreticAl to observaTIonAl star FoRmaTIon ratEs $ \lefT({\rM sFR}_{Th}/{\rm SFR}_{obs}\rIght)$. the disperSion in THis distRIbution Is $\apprOx 0.3$ dEx. FIg. \[fiG3\] DiSpLayS tHE scATtEr pLOts In the $\SigMa_{G}-\SIgma_{\rM SFR}$ SPACE (lefT coLumn) And in The $\Sigma_{*}-\Sigma_{\Rm SfR}$ spACe (rIght cOlumn). the oBsErvatIons arE showN wIth the red open trIangLes, and the TheOrEtiCaL estiMAtes arE shOwn With the Black opEN diAmONDS (tOp) and as a closed contOuRS CoNtaining $68\%$ Of the tHEoReTIcal poinTs (BotTom). A NOTiceaBle aSPeCt of Fig. \[fIg3\] is thAT iN tHe low suRfAce denSiTy rEgiMe ($\SigMA_{g} \leSssim 10-15$ M$_{\Odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), thE modeL Matches perfectLY the data, both iN TeRMS oF The dEpeNdence of $\SigMa_{\rm sfR}$ on $\sigmA_{G}$ aNd $\SIGma_{*}$ anD in teRmS Of THe level of dispersion At Any givEn valUe of $\Sigma_{g}$ and $\sigma_{*}$. At higHER Surface dEnsiTIeS ($\sigma_{g} \gtrsim 15$ M$_{\oDot}$ pc$^{-2}$), The theoretICal estimAtes oF $\Sigma_{\rm sFR}$ are larGER than the ObsErvEd oNes BY FaCtors of $\approx 2-5$. iT Is imPoRtant to NotE that ouR foRmaLisM doEs Not accounT expliciTlY fOr ThE efFects OF feedbacK fRom MaSsiVe staRS, which Are moRe imPoRtANt aT higher SUrFACe deNsItIes wHerE mOre maSsivE CluSters caN form. The iNcrEAsed EfFeCt of feeDback at high suRfAce densitiEs LeaDs to a mORE rapid exPulsion of the gas from the cLUsters aNd tO a redUctiOn of the stAr fOrmatiOn eFFicienCy per uNit tiMe (dib 2011A). dIb (2011a), shOWEd ThaT iN the surfacE DEnsIty reGiMe reLevant fOr this work ($1$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2} \lESssIm \Sigma_{g} \lesssIm 50$ M$_{\Odot}$ PC$^{-2}$), ThE vaLUe OF thE
 in numerical simulations(e.g., Sem enovetal.  2 016,  see  Fig. \[fig2\] in t heir paper). This valu e isaf acto r  $ \appr ox 10$s ma l l erth an  th ea ve rageval ue meas ured on th e s ca le of giantm ol ecular clo uds  (GMCs) in t heGalaxy  ( Mur r ay 20 11) . Thi s is e x pected  since th eg as isd enser a n d  m oregravitationally b o un d  in GMCs thanthe sp at i al l y  av era ged gas de ns ities on scal e so f 750 pc (as are th e observati o nsof NGC  6 28) or onentir eg ala ctic scales .

F ig. \[fig 2\] di s plays t h e distr ibutio n f unc tion of  t hera t ioo fthe the oretical  t oobser vati o n a l  sta r f orma tionrates $ \left ({\ rm S F R}_ {th}/ {\rmSFR} _{ obs}\ right) $. Th edispersion in t hisdistribut ion  i s $ \a pprox 0.3$ d ex.  Fi g. \[fi g3\] di s pla ys t h escatter plots in t he $ \S igma_{g} -\Sigm a _{ \r m  SFR}$ s pa ce(lef t colum n) a n din the $ \Sigma _ {* }- \Sigma_ {\ rm SFR }$  sp ace  (rig h t co lumn).  The obs ervat i ons are shownw ith the red o p en t ri a ngle s,and the the oret i calesti m at esa re sh own w it h  t h e black open diamon ds  (top)  andas a closed c ontours co n t a ining $6 8\%$ of the theoretica l poi nts (botto m ). A not iceab le aspec t of Fig. \ [fig3\]istha t i n t h e  l ow surface de n s ityre gime ($ \Si gma_{g}  \l ess sim  10 -1 5$ M$_{\o dot}$ pc $^ {- 2} $) , t he mo d el match es  pe rf ect ly th e  data,  both  inte rm s  of  the de p en d e nceof  $ \Sig ma_ {\ rm SF R}$o n $ \Sigma_ {g}$ and$\S i gma_ {* }$  and in  terms of the  l evel of di sp ers ion at a ny given  value of $\Sigma_{g}$a nd $\Si gma _{*}$ . At  higher s urf ace de nsi t ies ($ \Sigma _{g}\g trs i m  15$M $ _{ \od ot }$ pc$^{-2 } $ ),the t he oret ical es timates of $\Sigma _ {\r m SFR}$ are l arg er t h a nthe ob s erv ed one s by factors of $ \approx 2- 5$ .  I t is impor t ant  t o notethat ou r for m alism d oes not a ccount ex pl icit l y  fo r the effe cts of f eedback f r om ma s si ve st ars , whic hare  more  impor t ant  at h ighersu rfacedensi ti es where  more massive clusterscan fo rm. T heincreased  ef f ect  of feedb ackat high su rfa cedensi tie s  lead s to amor e  rapi d ex p ulsion of th e g a s  f rom the clu s t e rsand t o a reduct ionof the star forma t ion efficiency  per u nit  ti m e (D ib  2011a). Dib ( 201 1a ) ,  showedth at in the s urface d en s ity r egimereleva nt fort h is work ( $1$M$_ {\odot}$pc$ ^{ - 2} \les ss im \Sigma _{g}  \ lesssi m 50$M $_{\ o d ot}$ pc$^{-2}$),  thev a lue o f  th e
 in_numerical simulations_(e.g., Semenov et al._2016, see_Fig. \[fig2\]_in their_paper)._This value is_a factor $\approx_10$ smaller than the_average value measured_on_the scale of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Galaxy (Murray 2011). This is_expected_since the_gas_is_denser and more gravitationally bound_in GMCs than the spatially_averaged gas_densities on scales of 750 pc (as are_the_observations of NGC_628) or on entire galactic scales.

Fig. \[fig2\] displays the distribution_function of the ratio of the_theoretical to observational_star_formation_rates $ \left({\rm SFR}_{th}/{\rm_SFR}_{obs}\right)$. The dispersion in this distribution_is $\approx 0.3$ dex. Fig. \[fig3\] displays_the scatter plots in the $\Sigma_{g}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$_space (left column) and in the_$\Sigma_{*}-\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ space (right column)._The observations_are shown with the red_open triangles, and_the theoretical_estimates are shown_with the black open diamonds (top)_and as a_closed contours containing $68\%$ of the_theoretical_points (bottom). A_noticeable_aspect_of Fig. \[fig3\]_is that in_the_low surface_density_regime ($\Sigma_{g} \lesssim 10-15$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$),_the_model matches perfectly the data, both in_terms of the dependence_of_$\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ on $\Sigma_{g}$_and $\Sigma_{*}$ and in terms_of the level of dispersion at_any given_value of_$\Sigma_{g}$ and $\Sigma_{*}$. At higher surface densities ($\Sigma_{g} \gtrsim 15$ M$_{\odot}$_pc$^{-2}$), the theoretical estimates of $\Sigma_{\rm_SFR}$ are larger than_the observed_ones_by factors of_$\approx_2-5$. It_is important to note that our formalism_does not_account explicitly for the effects of_feedback from massive stars,_which_are more important at higher surface_densities where more massive clusters can_form. The increased effect of_feedback_at_high surface densities leads to_a more rapid expulsion of the_gas from the_clusters and to a reduction of the_star_formation efficiency per unit time (Dib_2011a)._Dib (2011a), showed that in the_surface_density_regime relevant for this work_($1$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2} \lesssim \Sigma_{g} \lesssim_50$ M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), the value of the