   0.7076(1)   1.99047341                  -0.00416
  8,10,12   0.8483(1)   0.7061(1)   1.99348414                  -0.00443

  : \[tab:c345\]Maxima of the effective central charge for the system ${\cal M}_{345}$, and the deviation from the value at the decoupling point.

  $L$       $x_2'^*$    $x_3'^*$    $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$   $\Delta c$
  --------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------
  2,4,6     0.9230(1)   0.8679(1)   2.27445933                  -0.0115
  4,6,8     0.9218(1)   0.8661(1)   2.32198052                  -0.0185
  6,8,10    0.9213(1)   0.8645(1)   2.33129236                  -0.0190
  8,10,12   0.9213(5)   0.8645(5)   2.333272                    -0.0225

  : \[tab:c456\]Maxima of the effective central charge for the system ${\cal M}_{456}$, and the deviation from the value at the decoupling point.

The corresponding finite-size estimates for $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ and for $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ are given in Tables \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\]. Rather than directly extrapolating $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ to the $L\to\infty$ limit, we consider instead for any $L$ its deviation $\Delta c(L)$ with respect to the corresponding value found at the point where the three Potts models decouple. Since this deviation is numerically small, it is reasonable to expect that the finite-size corrections to $c$ at $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ are similar to those at the decoupling point. Tables \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\] confirm that this is indeed the case: the estimates for $\Delta c$ only depend very weakly on $L$. As $L\to
0.7076(1)    1.99047341                   -0.00416 
   8,10,12    0.8483(1)    0.7061(1)    1.99348414                   -0.00443 

  : \[tab: c345\]Maxima of the effective central charge for the system $ { \cal M}_{345}$, and the deviation from the value at the decoupling item. 

   $ L$        $ x_2'^*$     $ x_3'^*$     $ (c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$    $ \Delta c$ 
   --------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------ 
   2,4,6      0.9230(1)    0.8679(1)    2.27445933                   -0.0115 
   4,6,8      0.9218(1)    0.8661(1)    2.32198052                   -0.0185 
   6,8,10     0.9213(1)    0.8645(1)    2.33129236                   -0.0190 
   8,10,12    0.9213(5)    0.8645(5)    2.333272                     -0.0225 

  : \[tab: c456\]Maxima of the effective cardinal charge for the system $ { \cal M}_{456}$, and the diversion from the value at the decoupling point. 

 The represent finite - size estimates for $ (x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ and for $ (c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ are given in Tables   \[tab: c345\ ] and \[tab: c456\ ]. preferably than directly extrapolating $ (c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ to the $ L\to\infty$ terminus ad quem, we think instead for any $ L$ its diversion $ \Delta c(L)$ with respect to the corresponding value found at the point where the three Potts model decouple. Since this deviation is numerically small, it is reasonable to expect that the finite - size corrections to $ c$ at $ (x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ are alike to those at the decoupling point. Tables   \[tab: c345\ ] and \[tab: c456\ ] confirm that this is indeed the case: the estimate for $ \Delta c$ only depend very weakly on $ L$. As $ L\to
   0.7076(1)   1.99047341                  -0.00416
  8,10,12   0.8483(1)   0.7061(1)   1.99348414                  -0.00443

  : \[tab:c345\]Maxkma of the effective central cyarge for the system ${\cal M}_{345}$, xnd the dvviation drom rhe value ef the dceoupljkg ponnv.

  $L$       $x_2'^*$    $x_3'^*$    $(c_{\rm aff})_{\rm max}$   $\Dentx e$
  --------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------
  2,4,6     0.9230(1)   0.8679(1)   2.27445933                  -0.0115
  4,6,8     0.9218(1)   0.8661(1)   2.32198052                  -0.0185
  6,8,10    0.9213(1)   0.8645(1)   2.33129236                  -0.0190
  8,10,12   0.9213(5)   0.8645(5)   2.333272                    -0.0225

  : \[tab:c456\]Maxima of tje evfective central cjarge for tye srwtem ${\cal M}_{456}$, avd the devpction from jhe value at the decoupling poing.

The eorrespondibg fijhte-size estmmates for $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ and npr $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm kax}$ are given ln Taules \[rab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\]. Rather vhan directly extrapjlating $(c_{\sm eff})_{\rm max}$ to the $L\ro\infjy$ likit, dw cunsjdxr jnsteaf fkr any $L$ ifs deviatiob $\Delta c(L)$ with reskece to the correapondigg value found at the point where the thrte Pofts models decouple. Sinxe this deviation is jumericaljy small, it is reasonable to expect that the finide-sizx zorxcgtiovw ho $c$ at $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ are similar to those at the decoupjjnb ioint. Tables \[tab:c345\] cnd \[tab:c456\] confirm tjay this is indegd the ezss: the estimates fog $\Delta c$ onoy depend veru weakly on $L$. As $L\to
0.7076(1) 1.99047341 -0.00416 8,10,12 0.8483(1) 0.7061(1) 1.99348414 \[tab:c345\]Maxima the effective charge for the deviation the value at decoupling point. $L$ $x_3'^*$ $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ $\Delta c$ ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------ 2,4,6 0.9230(1) 0.8679(1) 2.27445933 -0.0115 4,6,8 0.9218(1) 0.8661(1) 2.32198052 6,8,10 0.9213(1) 0.8645(1) 2.33129236 -0.0190 8,10,12 0.9213(5) 0.8645(5) 2.333272 -0.0225 : \[tab:c456\]Maxima of effective charge the ${\cal M}_{456}$, and the deviation from the value at the decoupling point. The corresponding finite-size estimates $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ and for $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ are given Tables \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\]. than directly extrapolating $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm to $L\to\infty$ limit, consider for $L$ its deviation c(L)$ with respect to the corresponding value found at the point where the three Potts models decouple. this deviation small, it reasonable expect the finite-size corrections at $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ are similar to those point. Tables \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\] confirm that this indeed the the estimates for $\Delta c$ only very weakly on $L$. As $L\to
   0.7076(1)   1.99047341                  -0.00416
  8,10,12   0.8483(1)   0.7061(1)   1.99348414                  -0.00443

  : \[tab:c345\]Maxima of the effective cEntral charGe for The SysTeM ${\cal m}_{345}$, and The deviation frOM the Value at the decoupling poInt.

  $L$       $x_2'^*$    $X_3'^*$    $(c_{\RM eff})_{\RM mAx}$   $\DelTa c$
  --------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------
  2,4,6     0.9230(1)   0.8679(1)   2.27445933                  -0.0115
  4,6,8     0.9218(1)   0.8661(1)   2.32198052                  -0.0185
  6,8,10    0.9213(1)   0.8645(1)   2.33129236                  -0.0190
  8,10,12   0.9213(5)   0.8645(5)   2.333272                    -0.0225

  : \[tab:c456\]mAxIMA of ThE eFfeCtIVe CentrAl cHarge foR the system ${\Cal m}_{456}$, aNd the deviatiON fRom the valuE at The decouplinG poInt.

The CoRreSPondiNg fInite-Size esTImates For $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ and fOr $(C_{\Rm eff})_{\rM Max}$ are gIVEn In TaBles \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\]. RaTHeR Than directly exTrapolAtINg $(C_{\RM efF})_{\rm Max}$ to the $L\tO\iNfty$ lIMit, we coNSiDER InsTEad for any $L$ its Deviation $\DeLTa c(l)$ with rEsPecT To the cOrresPoNDinG value found At thE point wheRe the tHRee PottS Models dEcouplE. SiNce This DEvIaTioN iS NumERiCalLY smAll, it is rEaSoNable To exPECT That The FiniTe-sizE corrections tO $c$ aT $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ aRE siMilar To thoSe at ThE decoUpling Point. taBles \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\] ConfIrm that thIs iS iNdeEd The caSE: the esTimAteS for $\DelTa c$ only DEpeNd VERY wEakly on $L$. As $L\to
   0.7076(1)   1.99047341               - 0.0 04 16
 8,1 0,12   0.8483( 1 )  0.7061(1)   1.99348414             -0 .00443 : \[t ab :c 345 \] M ax ima o f t he effe ctive cent ral  c harge for th e  s ystem ${\c alM}_{345}$, a ndthe de vi ati o n fro m t he va lue at the de couplingpo i nt.

$L$    $ x_2' ^*$    $x_3'^*$  $ ( c_{\rm eff})_{ \rm ma x} $  $ \De lta  c$
  ---- -- --- - - ------- - -- - - --- - ---- -------- ----------- - --- ---- - -- --- - -----  2,4 ,6    0.9230(1)  0. 8679(1)  2.274 4 5933              -0 .01 15
4, 6, 8  0.9 2 18 (1)   0 .8661(1)   2 .3219 8052            -0 .0185
  6,8,1 0   0. 9 213 (1)  0.86 45(1 )  2.3 312923 6                -0. 0190 
  8,10,1 2  0 .92 13 (5) 0.8645 (5)   2.33327 2            -0.0225

  : \[ ta b : c4 56\]Maxi ma oft he  e f fectivece ntr al c h a rge f or t h esystem $ {\calM }_ {4 56}$, a nd  the d ev iat ion  from thevalueat the d ecoup l ing point.

Th e  correspondin g  f i n it e -siz e e stimates fo r $( x _2'^ *,x_ 3 '^ *)$ and f or $( c_ { \r m  eff})_{\rm max}$ a re  given  in T ables \[tab:c 345\] and\ [ t ab:c456\ ]. R a th e r than directl y ext rapolating $(c_{\rm  eff} )_{\rm m ax}$ to t h e  $L\to\i nft y$lim it, w econsider inst e a d fo rany $L$  it s devia tio n $ \De lta  c (L)$ with  respect  t oth ecor respo n ding val ue  fo un d a t the pointwhere  the  t hr e e P otts mo d el s deco up le . Si nce  t his d evia t ion  is num ericallysma l l, i tis  reason able to expec tthat the f in ite -sizec o rrection s to $c$ at $(x_2'^*,x_ 3 '^*)$ a resimil ar t o those a t t he dec oup l ing po int. T ables  \ [ta b : c345\ ] an d \ [t ab:c456\]c o nfi rm th at  thi s is in deed the case: the est imates for $\ Del ta c $ on lyd ep e ndve r y w e a kly on $L$. As$L\to
 _ 0.7076(1)_  1.99047341 _ __ __  _  _   _-0.00416
  8,10,12__ 0.8483(1)   0.7061(1)   1.99348414      __ ___    _ -0.00443

  : \[tab:c345\]Maxima_of the_effective central charge for the system ${\cal M}_{345}$,_and_the deviation from_the value at the decoupling point.

  $L$ _     $x_2'^*$_  _$x_3'^*$__  $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm_max}$   $\Delta c$
 _--------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- ------------
 _2,4,6     0.9230(1) _ 0.8679(1)   2.27445933 _    _ _    _  _ -0.0115
_ 4,6,8 _   0.9218(1)  _0.8661(1)  _2.32198052     __  ___ _  __-0.0185
 _6,8,10_   0.9213(1)  _0.8645(1)_  2.33129236    _   __   _    -0.0190
_ 8,10,12   0.9213(5) _ 0.8645(5)_ _2.333272          _     _   -0.0225

_ :_\[tab:c456\]Maxima_of the effective_central_charge for_the system ${\cal M}_{456}$, and the deviation_from the_value at the decoupling point.

The corresponding_finite-size estimates for $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$_and_for $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$ are given_in Tables \[tab:c345\] and \[tab:c456\]. Rather than_directly extrapolating $(c_{\rm eff})_{\rm max}$_to_the_$L\to\infty$ limit, we consider instead_for any $L$ its deviation $\Delta_c(L)$ with respect_to the corresponding value found at the_point_where the three Potts models decouple._Since_this deviation is numerically small, it_is_reasonable_to expect that the finite-size_corrections to $c$ at $(x_2'^*,x_3'^*)$ are_similar to those at the decoupling point. Tables \[tab:c345\] and_\[tab:c456\] confirm that_this is indeed the case:_the_estimates_for $\Delta c$ only depend very weakly on $L$. As_$L\to