xi)$. To some extent, one may get round the difficulty by observing that for points remaining fixed with respect to a subgroup ${\cal G}$ of ${\cal S}$, the minimization problem is reduced to that for a smaller number of variables. This is due to the necessary conditions for extremum being verified automatically for degrees of freedom perpendicular to the set of invariant points, so that one needs only to study the conditions for longitudinal variables, that is to solve a smaller system of equations.

To see the point let us consider a function $f(x,y,z)$ of variables $x, y, z$ even in $x$, so that $f(x,y,z) = f(- \, x, y,z)$. The set of invariant points is $y-z$ plane, and we may look for minima of the function $f(x=0,y,z)$, thus we need to solve only two equations $$\frac{\partial}{\partial y}f(x=0, y,z) = 0, \quad \frac{\partial }{\partial z}f(x=0, y,z) = 0$$ The number of variables necessary for calculations can be reduced even further in case of larger groups of symmetries. It is easy to convince oneself that the sets of fixed points $(\phi_1, \phi_2,
\xi)$, that is invariant under the action of a subgroup of ${\cal S}$, read as follows $$\begin{aligned}
    {\cal F}_1 &:&  (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = \phi + \pi, \; \xi) \label{F1}   \\
    {\cal F}_2 &:&  (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = - \, \phi, \; \xi) \label{F2} \\
    {\cal F}_3 &:&  (\phi_1 = \pm \, \frac{\pi}{2}, \; \phi_2 = \pm \,\frac{\pi}{2}, \; \xi)
    \label{F3}\end{aligned}$$ in which the ${\cal F}_i$ are invariant under the action of subgroups ${\cal H}_1, \; {\cal H}_2, \;
{\cal H}_3$, respectively. The above symmetries are illustrated in Figure 4.

![ \[symmetrygraph\] (a) Cube of the symmetries indicating sets in space $\phi
xi)$. To some extent, one may get round the difficulty by observing that for period remain fixed with respect to a subgroup $ { \cal G}$ of $ { \cal S}$, the minimization problem is reduce to that for a smaller number of variable. This is ascribable to the necessary conditions for extremum being verified automatically for degrees of exemption perpendicular to the set of invariant points, so that one need only to study the conditions for longitudinal variables, that is to solve a modest system of equations. 

 To see the compass point let us consider a function $ f(x, y, z)$ of variables $ x, y, z$ even in $ x$, so that $ f(x, y, z) = f(- \, x, y, z)$. The stage set of invariant points is $ y - z$ plane, and we may look for minima of the function $ f(x=0,y, z)$, therefore we need to solve only two equations $ $ \frac{\partial}{\partial y}f(x=0, y, z) = 0, \quad \frac{\partial } { \partial z}f(x=0, y, z) = 0$$ The number of variables necessary for calculation can be reduced even further in case of larger groups of symmetries. It is easy to convince oneself that the sets of fixed point $ (\phi_1, \phi_2, 
 \xi)$, that is invariant under the action of a subgroup of $ { \cal S}$, understand as follows $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     { \cal F}_1 &: &   (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = \phi + \pi, \; \xi) \label{F1 }    \\ 
     { \cal F}_2 &: &   (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = - \, \phi, \; \xi) \label{F2 } \\ 
     { \cal F}_3 &: &   (\phi_1 = \pm \, \frac{\pi}{2 }, \; \phi_2 = \pm \,\frac{\pi}{2 }, \; \xi) 
     \label{F3}\end{aligned}$$ in which the $ { \cal F}_i$ are invariant under the action of subgroups $ { \cal H}_1, \; { \cal H}_2, \; 
 { \cal H}_3 $, respectively. The above isotropy are illustrated in Figure 4. 

! [ \[symmetrygraph\ ] (a) Cube of the symmetries indicating set in space $ \phi
xi)$. Ho some extent, one may gtt round the diffnxulty uy obsedving thxt for points remaining fixev wirh rewpect to a subgroup ${\cau G}$ of ${\cap S}$, the nininuzation problem is reducsf to vhat for a smalker number of variables. Dhks is due to the necessary conditions for exyrfmum being veryfiec autkmatically for degrees of freedom lerpendpcular to the set of invariant points, so thwt oje needs only to shudy the cobdityins for longktudinal variables, thaj is to solve a smaller system ow equctions.

To seg fhf point let ns confider a funcbpon $f(x,y,s)$ of vatiables $x, y, z$ cven mn $x$, so that $f(x,y,z) = f(- \, x, y,v)$. The set of invariagt points ia $y-z$ plane, and we mqy lomk fmr mkbimx or vhe functlon $f(x=0,y,z)$, thus we need to solve only two equstyins $$\frac{\partizl}{\partyaj y}f(x=0, y,z) = 0, \quad \frac{\partial }{\partial z}f(x=0, y,z) = 0$$ The number of variaboes necessary for calfulations can be reduced even further in case of larger grmups kw svnmetrkws. It is easy to convince oneself that the sets kf fpxed points $(\phi_1, \pmi_2,
\xi)$, that is invaroajt onder the actiun of c shbgroup of ${\cal S}$, rfad as solloqs $$\begin{ajignrd}
    {\cal F}_1 &:&  (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = \phi + \pi, \; \xp) \lavel{F1}   \\
    {\cal F}_2 &:&  (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \'hi_2 = - \, \phi, \; \xi) \label{F2} \\
    {\cal F}_3 &:&  (\'hi_1 = \pj \, \frac{\pi}{2}, \; \ohi_2 = \pm \,\fdxc{\pi}{2}, \; \xi)
    \labeu{F3}\ekd{anigned}$$ in which the ${\cal F}_i$ are invaciant under ghe sction of subgrokps ${\cal H}_1, \; {\cal H}_2, \;
{\cal H}_3$, rfspecjively. The above symmetries are illustrated in Hmgure 4.

![ \[symmettygsapv\] (a) Cube of tme symmetries igdicating sets in spaee $\phi
xi)$. To some extent, one may get difficulty observing that points remaining fixed ${\cal of ${\cal S}$, minimization problem is to that for a smaller number variables. This is due to the necessary conditions for extremum being verified automatically degrees of freedom perpendicular to the set of invariant points, so that one only study conditions longitudinal variables, that is to solve a smaller system of equations. To see the point let consider a function $f(x,y,z)$ of variables $x, y, even in $x$, so $f(x,y,z) = f(- \, x, The of invariant is plane, we may look minima of the function $f(x=0,y,z)$, thus we need to solve only two equations $$\frac{\partial}{\partial y}f(x=0, y,z) = \quad \frac{\partial y,z) = The of necessary for calculations reduced even further in case of symmetries. It is easy to convince oneself that sets of points $(\phi_1, \phi_2, \xi)$, that is under the action of a subgroup of ${\cal read as follows $$\begin{aligned} {\cal F}_1 &:& (\phi_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = \phi + \xi) \label{F1} \\ {\cal &:& (\phi_1 = \; = \, \; \xi) \\ {\cal F}_3 &:& (\phi_1 = \pm \, \frac{\pi}{2}, \; \phi_2 \pm \,\frac{\pi}{2}, \; \xi) \label{F3}\end{aligned}$$ in which the ${\cal F}_i$ under action of subgroups H}_1, \; {\cal H}_2, {\cal respectively. The above symmetries in 4. Cube the indicating sets in space
xi)$. To some extent, one may get roUnd the diffIcultY by ObsErVing That For points remaiNIng fIxed with respect to a subgRoup ${\cAl g}$ Of ${\caL s}$, tHe minImizatiON pROBleM iS rEduCeD To That fOr a Smaller Number of vaRiaBlEs. This is due tO ThE necessary ConDitions for exTreMum beiNg VerIFied aUtoMaticAlly foR DegreeS of freedoM pERpendiCUlar to tHE SeT of iNvariant points, so tHAt ONe needs only to sTudy thE cONdITIonS foR longitudiNaL variABles, thaT Is TO SOlvE A smaller systeM of equationS.

to sEe the pOiNt lET us conSider A fUNctIon $f(x,y,z)$ of vaRiabLes $x, y, z$ eveN in $x$, so THat $f(x,y,z) = F(- \, X, y,z)$. The sEt of inVarIanT poiNTs Is $Y-z$ pLaNE, anD We May LOok For minimA oF tHe funCtioN $F(X=0,Y,Z)$, thuS we Need To solVe only two equaTioNs $$\frAC{\paRtial}{\PartiAl y}f(X=0, y,Z) = 0, \quad \Frac{\paRtial }{\PaRtial z}f(x=0, y,z) = 0$$ The nuMber Of variablEs nEcEssArY for cALculatIonS caN be reduCed even FUrtHeR IN CaSe of larger groups of SyMMEtRies. It is Easy to COnViNCe oneselF tHat The sETS of fiXed pOInTs $(\phi_1, \phi_2,
\Xi)$, that IS iNvAriant uNdEr the aCtIon Of a SubgrOUp of ${\Cal S}$, reAd as follOws $$\beGIn{aligned}
    {\cal F}_1 &:&  (\pHI_1 = \phi, \; \phi_2 = \phi + \pi, \; \xI) \LaBEL{F1}   \\
    {\CAl F}_2 &:&  (\pHi_1 = \pHi, \; \phi_2 = - \, \phi, \; \xi) \lAbel{f2} \\
    {\Cal F}_3 &:&  (\Phi_1 = \pM \, \FrAc{\pI}{2}, \; \Phi_2 = \pm \,\Frac{\pI}{2}, \; \xI)
    \LaBEl{F3}\end{aligned}$$ in whicH tHe ${\cal F}_I$ are iNvariant under The action oF SUBgroups ${\cAl H}_1, \; {\cAL H}_2, \;
{\CAl H}_3$, respectivelY. The aBove symmetRIes are ilLustrAted in FiGure 4.

![ \[symmeTRYgraph\] (a) CUbe Of tHe sYmmETRiEs indicating sETS in sPaCe $\phi
xi)$. To some extent, onemay get ro und t hedif fi cult y by  observing tha t  for  points remaining fixe d wit hr espe c tto asubgrou p  $ { \ cal  G }$  of  $ { \c al S} $,the min imizationpro bl em is reduce d  t o that for  asmaller numb erof var ia ble s . Thi s i s due  to th e  neces sary cond it i ons fo r  extrem u m  b eing  verified automat i ca l ly for degrees  of fr ee d om p erp end icular toth e set of inva r ia n t poi n ts, so that o ne needs on l y t o stud ythe condit ionsfo r  lo ngitudinalvari ables, th at ist o solve a small er sys tem  of  equ a ti on s.
T o  se e  t hep oin t let us  c on sider  a f u n c t ion$f( x,y, z)$ o f variables $ x,y, z $  ev en in  $x$,  soth at $f (x,y,z ) = f (-  \, x, y,z)$. T he s et of inv ari an t p oi nts i s  $y-z$  pl ane , and w e may l o okfo r m in ima of the functio n$ f (x =0,y,z)$ , thus we  n e ed to so lv e o nlyt w o equ atio n s$$\frac{ \parti a l} {\ partial  y }f(x=0 ,y,z ) =  0, \ q uad\frac{ \partial  }{\p a rtial z}f(x=0, y,z) = 0$$ Th e  n u m be r  ofvar iables nece ssar y  for  cal c ul ati o ns ca n bere d uc e d even further in c as e of l arger  groups of sy mmetries.I t is easyto c o nv i nce oneself th at th e sets off ixed poi nts $ (\phi_1,  \phi_2,\ x i)$, tha t i s i nva ria n t  u nder the acti o n  ofasubgrou p o f ${\ca l S }$,  re adas  follows$$\begin {a li gn ed }
   {\ c al F}_1&: & (\ phi _1 =\ phi, \ ; \ph i_2=\p h i +  \pi, \ ;  \ x i ) \l ab el {F1}   \\ 
   {\ca l  F} _2 &:& (\phi_1= \ p hi,\;  \ phi_2 =  - \, \phi, \ ;\xi) \labe l{ F2}  \\
 {\cal F} _3 &:&  (\phi_1 = \pm \ ,  \frac{ \pi }{2},  \;\phi_2 =\pm  \,\fr ac{ \ pi}{2} , \; \ xi)
  \l a b el{F3 } \ en d{a li gned}$$ in w hic h the  $ {\ca l F}_i$  are invariant und e r t he action ofsub grou p s  $ {\c a lH }_1 ,\ ; { \ c al H}_2, \;
{\c al H}_3$,re s pe ctively. T h e a bo ve symm etriesare i l lustrat ed in Fig ure 4.

! [\[sy m m etr ygraph\] ( a) Cubeof the sy m metri e sindic ati ng set sinspace  $\phi 
xi)$. To_some extent,_one may get round_the difficulty_by_observing that_for_points remaining fixed_with respect to_a subgroup ${\cal G}$_of ${\cal S}$,_the_minimization problem is reduced to that for a smaller number of variables. This is_due_to the_necessary_conditions_for extremum being verified automatically_for degrees of freedom perpendicular_to the_set of invariant points, so that one needs_only_to study the_conditions for longitudinal variables, that is to solve a_smaller system of equations.

To see the_point let us_consider_a_function $f(x,y,z)$ of variables_$x, y, z$ even in $x$,_so that $f(x,y,z) = f(- \,_x, y,z)$. The set of invariant points_is $y-z$ plane, and we may_look for minima of the_function $f(x=0,y,z)$,_thus we need to solve_only two equations_$$\frac{\partial}{\partial y}f(x=0,_y,z) = 0,_\quad \frac{\partial }{\partial z}f(x=0, y,z) =_0$$ The number_of variables necessary for calculations can_be_reduced even further_in_case_of larger_groups of symmetries._It_is easy_to_convince oneself that the sets of_fixed_points $(\phi_1, \phi_2,
\xi)$, that is invariant under_the action of a_subgroup_of ${\cal S}$, read_as follows $$\begin{aligned}
  _ {\cal F}_1 &:&  (\phi_1_= \phi,_\; \phi_2_= \phi + \pi, \; \xi) \label{F1}   \\
 _  {\cal F}_2 &:& _(\phi_1 = \phi, \;_\phi_2 =_-_\, \phi, \;_\xi)_\label{F2} \\
_   {\cal F}_3 &:& _(\phi_1 =_\pm \, \frac{\pi}{2}, \; \phi_2 =_\pm \,\frac{\pi}{2}, \; \xi)
__  \label{F3}\end{aligned}$$ in which the_${\cal F}_i$ are invariant under the_action of subgroups ${\cal H}_1,_\;_{\cal_H}_2, \;
{\cal H}_3$, respectively. The_above symmetries are illustrated in Figure_4.

![ \[symmetrygraph\] (a)_Cube of the symmetries indicating sets in_space_$\phi