pdf){width="0.9\hsize"}

Self-induced-vortex (SIV) state
-------------------------------

Since the temperature where the second component of $1/T_1$ emerges coincides with $T_{\rm SC}$ in UCoGe, the two-relaxation behavior of $1/T_1$ is considered to be intrinsic. Furthermore, from recent pressure NQR measurements on the same single crystal, the non-SC component of $1/T_1$ disappears in the high-pressure SC state, where the FM state is suppressed. This strongly indicates that the non-SC component is not an extrinsic effect, such as impurities or inhomogeneity of the sample, but an intrinsic effect induced by the presence of the FM moments. The plausible origin of the non-SC component is ascribed to the SIV, as pointed out in Sect. 2. The SIV state in UCoGe has also been indicated by a muon experiment[@VisserPRL2009], and is now clearly observed in magnetizatiion data.

It is worth examining the response of the magnetization of UCoGe to the interplay between FM and SC[@DeguchiJPSJ2010; @PaulsenPRL2012]. A rough estimation of the local critical field $H_{c1}$ from $H_{\rm c2}$ and $H_c$ (thermodynamic critical field estimated from specific heat) gives $H_{c1} \sim3$ G along the $c$-axis and approximately 0.1 G along the $a$- and $b$-axes. Clearly, owing to the strength of the internal field near 100 G (see table II), SIVs already exist at $H = 0$. In Fig. \[fig44\], it is worth observing the change in the hysteresis cycle above 500 mK and below $T_{\rm SC}$ at 75 mK: the coercive field is 6 G at 500 mK and increases 16 G at 75 mK[@HykelPRB2014]. Expulsion of the flux is shown in Fig. \[fig44\]. For $H \parallel c$, the flux expulsion is directly related to the bulk magnetization; it operates on each FM domain. Scanning SQUID microscopy [@HykelPRB2014] helps to clarify the macroscopic figures but the vortex lattice has not yet been observed. No shrinkage of FM domains has been detected, as proposed theoretically[@Fau05; @Dao11].
pdf){width="0.9\hsize " } 

 Self - induced - vortex (SIV) state 
 ------------------------------- 

 Since the temperature where the second component of $ 1 / T_1 $ emerge coincide with $ T_{\rm SC}$ in UCoGe, the two - relaxation behavior of $ 1 / T_1 $ is considered to be intrinsic. Furthermore, from late pressure NQR measurements on the same individual crystal, the non - SC component of $ 1 / T_1 $ disappear in the high - pressure SC department of state, where the FM state is suppressed. This powerfully indicates that the non - SC component is not an extrinsic consequence, such as impurities or inhomogeneity of the sample, but an intrinsic consequence induced by the presence of the FM moments. The plausible lineage of the non - SC component is ascribed to the SIV, as pointed out in Sect. 2. The SIV state in UCoGe has besides been indicated by a muon experiment[@VisserPRL2009 ], and is immediately clearly observed in magnetizatiion data. 

 It is deserving examining the response of the magnetization of UCoGe to the interplay between FM and SC[@DeguchiJPSJ2010; @PaulsenPRL2012 ]. A rough estimation of the local critical field $ H_{c1}$ from $ H_{\rm c2}$ and $ H_c$ (thermodynamic critical field estimate from specific heat) gives $ H_{c1 } \sim3 $ G along the $ c$-axis and approximately 0.1 G along the $ a$- and $ b$-axes. Clearly, owing to the strength of the internal field near 100 G (attend table II), SIVs already exist at $ H = 0$. In Fig.   \[fig44\ ], it is deserving note the change in the hysteresis cycle above 500 mK and below $ T_{\rm SC}$ at 75 mK: the coercive field is 6 gravitational constant at 500 mK and increases 16 G at 75 mK[@HykelPRB2014 ]. Expulsion of the flux is indicate in Fig.   \[fig44\ ]. For $ H \parallel c$, the flux expulsion is directly related to the bulk magnetization; it operates on each FM domain. scan SQUID microscopy   [ @HykelPRB2014 ] helps to clarify the macroscopic figures but the vortex lattice has not so far been observed. No shrinking of FM domains has been detected, as proposed theoretically[@Fau05; @Dao11 ].
pdf){aidth="0.9\hsize"}

Self-induced-voruex (SIV) state
-------------------------------

Sincg rhe tekperathre wherd the second component of $1/T_1$ xmertes ciincides with $T_{\rm SC}$ iv UCoGe, tje two-reoaxauion behavior of $1/V_1$ is consideres to ye intrinsic. Furjhermore, frok recent pressgrd UQR measurements on the same single srystal, tje non-SC compogent jf $1/T_1$ disappears in the high-pressure SC state, xhere the FM stste is suppressed. This strlnglj indicates that tje non-SC conponqbt is not an extrinsic effect, such as impurities or inhomogeneity of tke sample, boc an hntrinsic ehfect pnduced by thc presetce of yhe FM moments. Thx plqusible origin of the non-SC component if ascribeg co the SIV, as pointed oyt in Secd. 2. Tfw SKV atete in UClGe has also geen indicared by a muon experomqbt[@VisserPRL2009], ahd is gor clearly observed in magnetizatiion daua.

It js worth examining the eesponse of the magnejization os UCoGe to the interplay between FM and SC[@DeguchiBPSJ2010; @'ajlstnIVL2012]. A eokgh estimation of the local critical field $H_{c1}$ rrpm $H_{\rm c2}$ and $H_c$ (bhermodynamic critocwl sield estimatgd from spscific heat) gives $J_{c1} \sim3$ D alobg the $c$-avis snd approximately 0.1 G along rhe $a$- and $b$-aqes. Xlearly, owing to tke strength uf tne inyernal field near 100 G (sez tabls II), SIVs apready exjrt at $H = 0$. In Fig. \[wig44\], id is woruf observing the crange in vhe hvsteresir cyvle abjve 500 mK anf below $T_{\rm SC}$ at 75 mK: thf coetcive xield is 6 H at 500 mK and increases 16 G at 75 mK[@HykelPRB2014]. Expukshon of the ylux ix shown in Fid. \[fig44\]. For $H \parcllel c$, che fljx expulsikn is dmrectly relaeed to the bunn magnetizatmon; it opqratws ob each WO domain. Scannong SQUID microscopt [@HykelPRB2014] helps to clxdify the macroseukix figures but yhe vowtvx kaedice has not yet bedm obsdrved. No shvinyage of FM domains has baen setected, as proposrd theoretucally[@Fat05; @Dao11].
pdf){width="0.9\hsize"} Self-induced-vortex (SIV) state ------------------------------- Since the the component of emerges coincides with two-relaxation of $1/T_1$ is to be intrinsic. from recent pressure NQR measurements on same single crystal, the non-SC component of $1/T_1$ disappears in the high-pressure SC where the FM state is suppressed. This strongly indicates that the non-SC component not extrinsic such impurities or inhomogeneity of the sample, but an intrinsic effect induced by the presence of the moments. The plausible origin of the non-SC component ascribed to the SIV, pointed out in Sect. 2. SIV in UCoGe also indicated a muon experiment[@VisserPRL2009], is now clearly observed in magnetizatiion data. It is worth examining the response of the magnetization of to the FM and @PaulsenPRL2012]. rough of the local $H_{c1}$ from $H_{\rm c2}$ and $H_c$ estimated from specific heat) gives $H_{c1} \sim3$ G the $c$-axis approximately 0.1 G along the $a$- $b$-axes. Clearly, owing to the strength of the field near 100 G (see table II), SIVs already exist at $H = 0$. In it is worth observing change in the cycle 500 and $T_{\rm SC}$ 75 mK: the coercive field is 6 G at 500 mK increases 16 G at 75 mK[@HykelPRB2014]. Expulsion of the flux in \[fig44\]. For $H c$, the flux expulsion directly to the bulk magnetization; on FM microscopy helps clarify the macroscopic figures the vortex lattice has not been observed. No shrinkage detected, as proposed theoretically[@Fau05; @Dao11].
pdf){width="0.9\hsize"}

Self-induced-vOrtex (SIV) stAte
-------------------------------

SiNce The TeMperAturE where the seconD CompOnent of $1/T_1$ emerges coincidEs witH $T_{\RM SC}$ iN uCOGe, thE two-relAXaTIOn bEhAvIor Of $1/t_1$ Is ConsiDerEd to be iNtrinsic. FuRthErMore, from receNT pRessure NQR MeaSurements on tHe sAme sinGlE crYStal, tHe nOn-SC cOmponeNT of $1/T_1$ diSappears iN tHE high-pREssure Sc STaTe, whEre the FM state is suPPrESsed. This strongLy indiCaTEs THAt tHe nOn-SC componEnT is noT An extriNSiC EFFecT, Such as impuritIes or inhomoGEneIty of tHe SamPLe, but aN intrInSIc eFfect induceD by tHe presencE of the fm momentS. the plauSible oRigIn oF the NOn-sC ComPoNEnt IS aScrIBed To the SIV, As PoInted Out iN sECT. 2. The sIV StatE in UCOGe has also beeN inDicaTEd bY a muoN expeRimeNt[@visseRPRL2009], anD is noW cLearly observed iN magNetizatiiOn dAtA.

It Is Worth EXaminiNg tHe rEsponse Of the maGNetIzATIOn Of UCoGe to the interpLaY BEtWeen FM anD SC[@DegUChIJpsJ2010; @PaulseNPrL2012]. A RougH EStimaTion OF tHe local cRiticaL FiElD $H_{c1}$ from $h_{\rM c2}$ and $H_C$ (tHerModYnamiC CritIcal fiEld estimAted fROm specific heat) GIves $H_{c1} \sim3$ G aloNG tHE $C$-aXIs anD apProximately 0.1 g aloNG the $A$- and $B$-AxEs. CLEarly, Owing To THe STrength of the internaL fIeld neAr 100 G (seE table II), SIVs aLready exisT AT $h = 0$. In Fig. \[fiG44\], it iS WoRTh observing the ChangE in the hystEResis cycLe aboVe 500 mK and bElow $T_{\rm SC}$ AT 75 MK: the coeRciVe fIelD is 6 g AT 500 mk and increases 16 g AT 75 mK[@HYkElPRB2014]. ExPulSion of tHe fLux Is sHowN iN Fig. \[fig44\]. FoR $H \parallEl C$, tHe FlUx eXpulsIOn is direCtLy rElAteD to thE Bulk maGnetiZatiOn; It OPerAtes on eACh fm DomaIn. scAnniNg SqUiD micRoscOPy [@HYkelPRB2014] Helps to clAriFY the MaCrOscopic Figures but the VoRtex latticE hAs nOt yet bEEN observeD. No shrinkage of FM domains HAs been dEteCted, aS proPosed theoRetIcally[@fau05; @dAo11].
pdf){width="0.9\hsize"}

S elf-induce d-vor tex  (S IV ) st ate-------------- - ---- ------------

Since th e tem pe r atur e  w herethe sec o nd c omp on en t o f$ 1/ T_1$eme rges co incides wi th$T _{\rm SC}$ i n  U CoGe, thetwo -relaxationbeh aviorof  $1 / T_1$isconsi deredt o be i ntrinsic.  F u rtherm o re, fro m re cent  pressure NQR mea s ur e ments on the s ame si ng l ec r yst al,  the non-S Ccompo n ent of$ 1/ T _ 1 $ d i sappears in t he high-pre s sur e SC s ta te, wherethe F Ms tat e is suppre ssed . This st rongly indicat e s thatthe no n-S C c ompo n en tisno t  an ex tri n sic  effect,  s uc h asimpu r i t i es o r i nhom ogene ity of the sa mpl e, b u t a n int rinsi c ef fe ct in ducedby th epresence of the  FMmoments.The  p lau si ble o r igin o f t henon-SCcompone n t i sa s c ri bed to the SIV, as  p o i nt ed out i n Sect .  2 .T he SIV s ta tein U C o Ge ha s al s obeen ind icated by  a  muon e xp erimen t[ @Vi sse rPRL2 0 09],  and i s now cl early observed in ma g netizatiion d a ta . 
I t  iswor th examinin g th e  res pons e  o f t h e mag netiz at i on of UCoGe to the int er play b etwee n FM and SC[@ DeguchiJPS J 2 0 10; @Pau lsen P RL 2 012]. A roughestim ation of t h e localcriti cal fiel d $H_{c1} $ from $H_ {\r m c 2}$  an d $H _c$ (thermody n a miccr iticalfie ld esti mat edfro m s pe cific hea t) gives  $ H_ {c 1}  \s im3$G  along t he  $c $- axi s and approx imate ly 0 .1  G alo ng the$ a$ - and$b $- axes . C le arly,  owi n g t o the s trength o f t h e in te rn al fiel d near 100 G(s ee table I I) , S IVs al r e ady exis t at $H = 0$. In Fig. \ [ fig44\] , i t iswort h observi ngthe ch ang e  in th e hyst eresi scyc l e  abov e 50 0 m Kand below$ T _{\ rm SC }$  at75 mK:the coercive field is6 G at 500 mK  an d in c r ea ses 16 G a t7 5 m K [ @HykelPRB2014].  Expulsion  o f  t he flux is sho wn  in Fig . \[fig 44\]. For $H\parallel  c$, thefl ux e x p uls ion is dir ectly re lated tot he bu l kmagne tiz ation;  i t o perat es one ach  FM d omain.  S cannin g SQU ID  microsc opy [@HykelPRB2014] hel ps toclari fythe macro sco p icfigures b ut t he vortexlat tic e has  no t  yetbeen ob ser v ed. N o sh r inkage of FM  do m a in s has beend e t ect ed, a s p r oposed  the oretically[@Fau05 ;  @Dao11].
pdf){width="0.9\hsize"}

Self-induced-vortex (SIV)_state
-------------------------------

Since the_temperature where the second_component of_$1/T_1$_emerges coincides_with_$T_{\rm SC}$ in_UCoGe, the two-relaxation_behavior of $1/T_1$ is_considered to be_intrinsic._Furthermore, from recent pressure NQR measurements on the same single crystal, the non-SC component_of_$1/T_1$ disappears_in_the_high-pressure SC state, where the_FM state is suppressed. This_strongly indicates_that the non-SC component is not an extrinsic_effect,_such as impurities_or inhomogeneity of the sample, but an intrinsic effect_induced by the presence of the_FM moments. The_plausible_origin_of the non-SC component_is ascribed to the SIV, as_pointed out in Sect. 2. The_SIV state in UCoGe has also been_indicated by a muon experiment[@VisserPRL2009], and_is now clearly observed in_magnetizatiion data.

It_is worth examining the response_of the magnetization_of UCoGe_to the interplay_between FM and SC[@DeguchiJPSJ2010; @PaulsenPRL2012]. A_rough estimation of_the local critical field $H_{c1}$ from_$H_{\rm_c2}$ and $H_c$_(thermodynamic_critical_field estimated_from specific heat)_gives_$H_{c1} \sim3$_G_along the $c$-axis and approximately 0.1_G_along the $a$- and $b$-axes. Clearly, owing_to the strength of_the_internal field near 100_G (see table II), SIVs_already exist at $H = 0$._In Fig. \[fig44\],_it is_worth observing the change in the hysteresis cycle above 500 mK_and below $T_{\rm SC}$ at 75_mK: the coercive field_is 6_G_at 500 mK_and_increases 16_G at 75 mK[@HykelPRB2014]. Expulsion of the_flux is_shown in Fig. \[fig44\]. For $H \parallel_c$, the flux expulsion_is_directly related to the bulk magnetization;_it operates on each FM domain._Scanning SQUID microscopy [@HykelPRB2014] helps to_clarify_the_macroscopic figures but the vortex_lattice has not yet been observed._No shrinkage of_FM domains has been detected, as proposed_theoretically[@Fau05;_@Dao11].