$, and $T=0.1t$.

Figures \[fig:cum\](a) and (b) show $\w_n$ dependence of the real and imaginary parts of the cumulant $M(\Vec{r},\w_n)$, respectively, where $\Vec{r} = (i,j)$ is the real-space vector connecting the sites $i$ and $j$ in the cluster \[the inset of Fig. \[fig:cum\](b)\]. We notice that $\Vec{r}=(0,0)$, (1,0), and (1,1) components are much larger than the other components at longer distances. This can be more clearly seen in Fig. \[fig:cum\](c), where the cumulant at the lowest Matsubara frequency, $\w_0$, is plotted against the Euclidean distance, $\sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We find that the cumulant is well localized within the $2\times 2$ cluster, which justifies the $M$ periodization.

Although the cumulant at $T=0$ might be more extended than that at $T=0.1t$, we do not have a tractable way to examine it for a cluster larger than $2\times 2$. It is worthwhile, however, to note that the finite-temperature results obtained by our CDMFT+CTQMC calculation are consistent with the CDMFT+ED results with finite $\eta$’s, as discussed in Sec. \[ssec:arc\]. This fact implies that the $M$ periodization with $2\times 2$ cluster still remains a good approximation even at $T=0$.

APPENDIX C: Nodal spectra obtained by 8-site CDMFT+CTQMC {#appendix-c-nodal-spectra-obtained-by-8-site-cdmftctqmc.unnumbered}
========================================================

To demonstrate the fully-opened pseudogap in a larger cluster, we implement an 8-site cluster calculation with CDMFT+CTQMC. We calculate the spectral function $A(\Vec{k},\w)$ at $\Vec{k}=\Vec{k}_\text{node}\equiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, where the $d$- and $s$-wave (fully-opened) pseudogaps are most distinguishable. The spectral function is obtained from $G(\Vec{k},
$, and $ T=0.1t$. 

 Figures \[fig: cum\](a) and (b) show $ \w_n$ dependence of the veridical and fanciful parts of the cumulant $ M(\Vec{r},\w_n)$, respectively, where $ \Vec{r } = (i, j)$ is the veridical - distance vector connecting the sites $ i$ and $ j$ in the bunch \[the inset of Fig.   \[fig: cum\](b)\ ]. We notice that $ \Vec{r}=(0,0)$, (1,0), and (1,1) components are a lot large than the other component at longer distances. This can be more intelligibly seen in Fig.   \[fig: cum\](c), where the cumulant at the lowest Matsubara frequency, $ \w_0 $, is plotted against the Euclidean distance, $ \sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We find that the cumulant is well place within the $ 2\times 2 $ cluster, which justifies the $ M$ periodization. 

 Although the cumulant at $ T=0 $ might be more extended than that at $ T=0.1t$, we do not consume a tractable way to examine it for a cluster bigger than $ 2\times 2$. It is worthwhile, however, to note that the finite - temperature results obtained by our CDMFT+CTQMC calculation are consistent with the CDMFT+ED results with finite $ \eta$ ’s, as discourse in Sec.   \[ssec: arc\ ]. This fact implies that the $ M$ periodization with $ 2\times 2 $ cluster still remains a good approximation even at $ T=0$. 

 APPENDIX C: Nodal spectra obtained by 8 - site CDMFT+CTQMC { # appendix-c-nodal-spectra-obtained-by-8-site-cdmftctqmc.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 To demonstrate the fully - opened pseudogap in a larger cluster, we implement an 8 - site cluster calculation with CDMFT+CTQMC. We account the spectral function $ A(\Vec{k},\w)$ at $ \Vec{k}=\Vec{k}_\text{node}\equiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, where the $ d$- and $ s$-wave (in full - open) pseudogaps are most distinguishable. The spectral affair is obtained from $ G(\Vec{k },
$, anf $T=0.1t$.

Figures \[fig:cum\](a) and (n) show $\w_n$ dependgnxe of vhe ream and imxginary parts of the cumulanv $M(\Vwc{r},\w_n)$, respectively, where $\Vez{r} = (i,j)$ is the reao-spare vector connecvjng the sites $l$ and $o$ in the clustet \[the inset mf Fig. \[fig:cum\](b)\]. Fe nltice that $\Vec{r}=(0,0)$, (1,0), and (1,1) components arq much kagger than the jtheg sompknents at longer distances. This cah be moge clearly seen im Fig. \[fig:cum\](c), where the cumklanh at the lowest Mahsubara frewuenst, $\w_0$, is plottdd against the Euclidezn distance, $\sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We find that the eumulant is wwll nocalized wmthin nhe $2\times 2$ clmxter, wvich juxtifies the $M$ ieriovizarion.

Although the cumunant at $T=0$ might be more extanbed than that at $T=0.1t$, ww eo noj hava a geacgabme wzy to fxajine it fod a cluster larger than $2\times 2$. Ie is worthwhils, howedew, to note that the finite-temperature revulfs obtained by our CDMFR+CTQMC calculation arg consistegt with the CDMFT+ED results with finite $\eta$’s, as dhscusadd nk Rwc. \[dsec:arc\]. This fact implies that the $M$ periodizwfipn with $2\times 2$ cjuster stilk gekwins a good akproximcfikn even at $T=0$.

APPENDLX C: Noqal spectra obuainec by 8-site CDMFT+CTQMC {#appendux-c-nodal-specnra-ovtained-by-8-site-cdmftetqmc.unnumbexed}
========================================================

To cemonxtrate the fully-opened 'seudofap in a lagger clusfdr, we implement xn 8-xide clusttf calculation witr CDMFT+CTWMC. Ce calcuuate the s[ectral fujctiok $A(\Vec{k},\w)$ at $\Vec{k}=\Vec{n}_\text{uode}\exuiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, wjere the $d$- and $s$-wave (fully-openev) pseudogaps sra mmst distnnguismable. The spectwal function ix obtaiued frum $G(\Vec{k},
$, and $T=0.1t$. Figures \[fig:cum\](a) and (b) dependence the real imaginary parts of $\Vec{r} (i,j)$ is the vector connecting the $i$ and $j$ in the cluster inset of Fig. \[fig:cum\](b)\]. We notice that $\Vec{r}=(0,0)$, (1,0), and (1,1) components are larger than the other components at longer distances. This can be more clearly in \[fig:cum\](c), the at the lowest Matsubara frequency, $\w_0$, is plotted against the Euclidean distance, $\sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We find that cumulant is well localized within the $2\times 2$ which justifies the $M$ Although the cumulant at $T=0$ be extended than at we not have a way to examine it for a cluster larger than $2\times 2$. It is worthwhile, however, to note the finite-temperature by our calculation consistent the CDMFT+ED results $\eta$’s, as discussed in Sec. \[ssec:arc\]. that the $M$ periodization with $2\times 2$ cluster remains a approximation even at $T=0$. APPENDIX C: spectra obtained by 8-site CDMFT+CTQMC {#appendix-c-nodal-spectra-obtained-by-8-site-cdmftctqmc.unnumbered} ======================================================== To the fully-opened pseudogap in a larger cluster, we implement an 8-site cluster calculation with CDMFT+CTQMC. the spectral function $A(\Vec{k},\w)$ $\Vec{k}=\Vec{k}_\text{node}\equiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, where the and (fully-opened) are distinguishable. The function is obtained from $G(\Vec{k},
$, and $T=0.1t$.

Figures \[fig:cum\](a) and (b) shOw $\w_n$ dependEnce oF thE reAl And iMagiNary parts of the CUmulAnt $M(\Vec{r},\w_n)$, respectively, Where $\veC{R} = (i,j)$ iS ThE real-Space veCToR COnnEcTiNg tHe SItEs $i$ anD $j$ iN the cluSter \[the insEt oF FIg. \[fig:cum\](b)\]. We nOTiCe that $\Vec{r}=(0,0)$, (1,0), And (1,1) Components arE muCh largEr ThaN The otHer CompoNents aT Longer Distances. thIS can be MOre cleaRLY sEen iN Fig. \[fig:cum\](c), where tHE cUMulant at the lowEst MatSuBArA FReqUenCy, $\w_0$, is plottEd AgainST the EucLIdEAN DisTAnce, $\sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We fInd that the cUMulAnt is wElL loCAlized WithiN tHE $2\tiMes 2$ cluster, wHich Justifies The $M$ peRIodizatIOn.

AlthoUgh the CumUlaNt at $t=0$ MiGhT be MoRE exTEnDed THan That at $T=0.1t$, We Do Not haVe a tRACTAble Way To exAmine It for a cluster LarGer tHAn $2\tImes 2$. IT is woRthwHiLe, howEver, to Note tHaT the finite-tempeRatuRe results ObtAiNed By Our CDmfT+CTQMc caLcuLation aRe consiSTenT wITH ThE CDMFT+ED results witH fINItE $\eta$’s, as dIscussED iN SEC. \[ssec:arc\]. thIs fAct iMPLies tHat tHE $M$ PeriodizAtion wITh $2\TiMes 2$ clusTeR still ReMaiNs a Good aPProxImatioN even at $T=0$.

aPPENdiX C: Nodal spectrA Obtained by 8-sitE cDmft+CtqMC {#aPpeNdix-c-nodal-sPectRA-obtAineD-By-8-SitE-CdmftCtqmc.UnNUmBEred}
========================================================

To demonstrate thE fUlly-opEned pSeudogap in a laRger clusteR, WE ImplemenT an 8-sITe CLuster calculatIon wiTh CDMFT+CTQmc. We calcuLate tHe spectrAl functioN $a(\vec{k},\w)$ at $\VEc{k}=\vec{K}_\teXt{nODE}\eQuiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, where THE $d$- anD $s$-Wave (fulLy-oPened) psEudOgaPs aRe mOsT distinguIshable. THe SpEcTrAl fUnctiON is obtaiNeD frOm $g(\VeC{k},
$, and $T=0.1t$.

Figures\[fig:cum\ ](a)and  (b )show  $\w _n$ dependence of t he real and imaginaryparts  o f  the cu mulan t $M(\V e c{ r } ,\w _n )$ , r es p ec tivel y,where $ \Vec{r} =(i, j) $ is the rea l -s pace vecto r c onnecting th e s ites $ i$  an d  $j$inthe c luster \[theinset ofFi g . \[fi g :cum\]( b ) \] . We  notice that $\Ve c {r } =(0,0)$, (1,0) , and(1 , 1) c omp one nts are mu ch  larg e r thant he o t her components at  longer dis t anc es. Th is  ca n  be mo re cl ea r lyseen in Fig . \[ fig:cum\] (c), w h ere the cumulan t at t helow estM at su bar af req u en cy, $\w _0$, ispl ot ted a gain s t t he E ucl idea n dis tance, $\sqrt {i^ 2+j^ 2 }$.  We f ind t hatth e cum ulantis we ll  localized with in t he $2\tim es2$  cl us ter,w hich j ust ifi es the$M$ per i odi za t i o n. 

Although the cum ul a n tat $T=0$  might be  m o re exten de d t hant h at at  $T= 0 .1 t$, we d o noth av ea tract ab le way  t o e xam ine i t  for  a clu ster lar ger t h an $2\times 2$ .  It is worthw h il e ,  h o weve r,to note tha t th e  fin ite- t em per a tureresul ts ob t ained by our CDMFT+ CT QMC ca lcula tion are cons istent wit h t he CDMFT +EDr es u lts with finit e $\e ta$’s, asd iscussed  in S ec. \[ss ec:arc\]. T his fact  im pli estha t th e $M$ periodi z a tion  w ith $2\ tim es 2$ c lus ter  st ill  r emains agood app ro xi ma ti onevena t $T=0$. 
APP EN DIX  C: N o dal sp ectra  obt ai ne d  by  8-site CD M F T+CT QM C{#ap pen di x-c-n odal - spe ctra-ob tained-by -8- s ite- cd mf tctqmc. unnumbered}
= == ========== == === ====== = = ======== ======================To demo nst ratethefully-ope ned  pseud oga p  in alarger  clus te r,w e  impl e m en t a n8-site clu s t ercalcu la tion  with C DMFT+CTQMC. We cal c ula te the spectr alfunc t i on  $A ( \V e c{k }, \ w)$ a t $\Vec{k}=\Vec {k}_\text{ no d e} \equiv(\pi / 2,\ pi /2)$, w here th e $d$ -  and $s $-wave (f ully-open ed ) ps e u dog aps are mo st disti nguishabl e . The sp ectra l f unctio nisobtai ned fr o m $ G(\Ve c{k},
$, and_$T=0.1t$.

Figures \[fig:cum\](a)_and (b) show $\w_n$_dependence of_the_real and_imaginary_parts of the_cumulant $M(\Vec{r},\w_n)$, respectively,_where $\Vec{r} = (i,j)$_is the real-space_vector_connecting the sites $i$ and $j$ in the cluster \[the inset of Fig. \[fig:cum\](b)\]. We_notice_that $\Vec{r}=(0,0)$,_(1,0),_and_(1,1) components are much larger_than the other components at_longer distances._This can be more clearly seen in Fig. \[fig:cum\](c),_where_the cumulant at_the lowest Matsubara frequency, $\w_0$, is plotted against the_Euclidean distance, $\sqrt{i^2+j^2}$. We find that_the cumulant is_well_localized_within the $2\times 2$_cluster, which justifies the $M$ periodization.

Although_the cumulant at $T=0$ might be_more extended than that at $T=0.1t$, we_do not have a tractable way_to examine it for a_cluster larger_than $2\times 2$. It is_worthwhile, however, to_note that_the finite-temperature results_obtained by our CDMFT+CTQMC calculation are_consistent with the_CDMFT+ED results with finite $\eta$’s, as_discussed_in Sec. \[ssec:arc\]. This_fact_implies_that the_$M$ periodization with_$2\times_2$ cluster_still_remains a good approximation even at_$T=0$.

APPENDIX_C: Nodal spectra obtained by 8-site CDMFT+CTQMC_{#appendix-c-nodal-spectra-obtained-by-8-site-cdmftctqmc.unnumbered}
========================================================

To demonstrate the fully-opened_pseudogap_in a larger cluster,_we implement an 8-site cluster_calculation with CDMFT+CTQMC. We calculate the_spectral function_$A(\Vec{k},\w)$ at_$\Vec{k}=\Vec{k}_\text{node}\equiv(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, where the $d$- and $s$-wave (fully-opened) pseudogaps are most distinguishable._The spectral function is obtained from_$G(\Vec{k},