 is to enhance the stellar main sequence age by an average of $ 40\% $. Therefore, we included the stellar rotation correction suggested by @FB98. However, their rotation correction schemes are available only for stars with spectral type between approximately B7–A4. We extended the range of rotation correction such that for stars earlier than B7, we used the correction scheme for B7 stars and for stars later than A4, we used the correction scheme for A4 stars. Therefore, stars earlier or later than the Figueras & Blasi’s (1998) range will have more uncertain ages.

Large uncertainties in estimated ages are mainly due to the large error in $ \log g $. However, using a rotation correction scheme based on the projected stellar rotational velocities $ \left( v\sin i\right)  $ rather than a scheme based on the true stellar rotational velocities $ \left( v\right)  $ may have resulted in uncertainties also. The stellar rotation decreases the effective temperature depending on the inclination angle (small change of $ T_{eff} $ for $ i\approx 0^{\circ } $ but large change of $ T_{eff} $ for $ i\approx 90^{\circ } $) but the current rotation correction scheme cannot distinguish between the case of large $ v $ with small $ i $ and the case of small $ v $ with large $ i $. Thus, rotation correction using $ v\sin i $ instead of $ v $ may cause uncertainty in stellar ages.

Ages of Open Clusters
---------------------

The theoretical evolutionary grids of @Schaller92 were used to estimate ages of stars from $ T_{eff} $ and $ \log g $. To verify that our age dating method is working, we applied the method to a few open clusters with ages determined by other methods – $ \alpha  $ Perseus (80 Myr), Pleiades (125 Myr), NGC 6475 (220 Myr), M34 (225 Myr), and Hyades (660 Myr). The ages for the first two clusters are based on recent application of the lithium depletion boundary method (LDBM) (@PerAge and @Stauffer99 for $ \alpha  $ Perseus; @Stauffer98 for Pleiades). The ages for the other clusters are from upper main sequence isochrone fitting (UMSIF), and are taken from @JonesProsser or @Lynga. The age
is to enhance the stellar main sequence age by an average of $ 40\% $. consequently, we include the stellar rotation correction suggest by @FB98. However, their rotation discipline schemes are available only for stars with apparitional character between approximately B7 – A4. We extended the range of rotation correction such that for stars earlier than B7, we use the correction scheme for B7 headliner and for asterisk later than A4, we used the correction scheme for A4 stars. consequently, stars earlier or later than the Figueras & Blasi ’s (1998) image will have more uncertain old age. 

 Large uncertainty in estimated ages are mainly due to the large mistake in $ \log g $. However, using a rotation correction scheme based on the projected stellar rotational velocities $ \left (v\sin i\right)   $ rather than a scheme based on the true stellar rotational velocities $ \left (v\right)   $ may have resulted in uncertainties also. The leading rotation decrease the effective temperature depending on the tendency angle (small change of $ T_{eff } $ for $ i\approx 0^{\circ } $ but large variety of $ T_{eff } $ for $ i\approx 90^{\circ } $) but the current rotation correction schema cannot distinguish between the case of big $ v $ with small $ i $ and the case of small $ v $ with large $ i $. therefore, rotation correction using $ v\sin i $ instead of $ v $ may cause uncertainty in stellar ages. 

 old age of Open Clusters 
 --------------------- 

 The theoretical evolutionary grids of @Schaller92 were used to estimate ages of stars from $ T_{eff } $ and $ \log gravitational constant $. To verify that our age dating method acting is working, we apply the method to a few open bunch with ages determined by other methods – $ \alpha   $   Perseus (80   Myr), Pleiades (125   Myr), NGC   6475 (220   Myr), M34 (225   Myr), and Hyades (660   Myr). The ages for the inaugural two clusters are establish on recent lotion of the lithium depletion boundary method (LDBM) (@PerAge and @Stauffer99 for $ \alpha   $   Perseus; @Stauffer98 for Pleiades). The ages for the early clusters are from upper main sequence isochrone fitting (UMSIF), and are taken from @JonesProsser or @Lynga. The age
 is to enhance the stellar oain sequence ayw by ai averafe of $ 40\% $. Therefore, we included the svellqr rouction correction sugeested by @FB98. Howecer, uheir rotation cocdection schemsd arz evailable only nor stars whth spectral tfpd yetween approximately B7–A4. We extended the ramgf of rotation sorrtctyon alcm that for stars earlier than B7, se used the correctipn scheme for B7 stars and vor dtars later than A4, we used thg coweection scheoe for A4 suaxs. Thereforg, stars earlier or later than thd Figberas & Blasu’s (1998) rwtge will hate morv uncertain anvs.

Large uncertsinties in estlmatev agws are mainly due to vhe large error in $ \jog g $. Hoferer, using a rotation xoerecthon vcheow bxses pn the pgojxcted stellzr rotationql velocities $ \left( v\fpm i\right)  $ rzther ehwn a scheme based on the true stellar rmtafional velocities $ \left( v\right)  $ may have redulted in uncertainties also. The stellar rotation decreasev the dfftcblve gwmoerature depending on the inclination angle (sizlk bhange of $ T_{eff} $ nor $ i\approx 0^{\circ } $ huy large change of $ T_{zrf} $ for $ i\approx 90^{\cirf } $) but the xurrent rjtatoon correction scheme cannor distinguisk bwtween the case of large $ v $ cith skall $ i $ and the case of smaul $ b $ with larhe $ i $. Thhr, rotation correztipn using $ v\sin i $ instead of $ v $ may rause uncertxinti in stqllar ages.

Wges of Open Clusters
---------------------

The theotetican evolutiojary grids of @Schaller92 were usev to estimate aces of starf frok $ T_{eff} $ and $ \log g $. To vernfy that our xge dating method is working, we applied tvg method to a few opeg clystees with xges determinec by otheg iethids – $ \alpha  $ Persems (80 Myt), Lleiades (125 Myr), NGE 6475 (220 Nyr), M34 (225 Myr), and Huadds (660 Iyg). Tie agqv for the fisst gwo vlustdrs are bascd un rrcent application of the lithium depletion bjundary nethod (LQBM) (@PerAge anc @Stauffer99 for $ \alkha  $ Pxrseus; @Staugfet98 for Pleiades). The ages for the other clkstcrs are from tppev mayn sequencz isochrone fitting (UMSIF), and are taken hrom @JonesProsser or @Linga. The age
is to enhance the stellar main sequence an of $ $. Therefore, we suggested @FB98. However, their correction schemes are only for stars with spectral type approximately B7–A4. We extended the range of rotation correction such that for stars than B7, we used the correction scheme for B7 stars and for stars than we the scheme for A4 stars. Therefore, stars earlier or later than the Figueras & Blasi’s (1998) range have more uncertain ages. Large uncertainties in estimated are mainly due to large error in $ \log $. using a correction based the projected stellar velocities $ \left( v\sin i\right) $ rather than a scheme based on the true stellar rotational velocities \left( v\right) have resulted uncertainties The rotation decreases the depending on the inclination angle (small T_{eff} $ for $ i\approx 0^{\circ } $ large change $ T_{eff} $ for $ i\approx } $) but the current rotation correction scheme distinguish between the case of large $ v $ with small $ i $ and of small $ v with large $ $. rotation using v\sin i instead of $ v $ may cause uncertainty in stellar ages. of Open Clusters --------------------- The theoretical evolutionary grids of @Schaller92 to ages of stars $ T_{eff} $ and \log $. To verify that dating is the to few open clusters with determined by other methods – \alpha $ Perseus (80 6475 (220 Myr), M34 (225 Myr), and Hyades Myr). The ages for the first two are based on recent application of the lithium depletion boundary method (LDBM) and @Stauffer99 \alpha $ Perseus; @Stauffer98 for Pleiades). The ages the other clusters are upper main sequence isochrone fitting (UMSIF), and are taken @JonesProsser @Lynga. The
 is to enhance the stellar main Sequence agE by an AveRagE oF $ 40\% $. TheRefoRe, we included thE StelLar rotation correction sUggesTeD By @FB98. hOwEver, tHeir rotATiON CorReCtIon ScHEmEs are AvaIlable oNly for starS wiTh Spectral type BEtWeen approxImaTely B7–A4. We exteNdeD the raNgE of ROtatiOn cOrrecTion suCH that fOr stars eaRlIEr than b7, We used tHE CoRrecTion scheme for B7 staRS aND for stars later Than A4, wE uSEd THE coRreCtion schemE fOr A4 stARs. ThereFOrE, STArs EArlier or later Than the FiguERas & blasi’s (1998) RaNge WIll havE more UnCErtAin ages.

LargE uncErtaintieS in estIMated agES are maiNly due To tHe lArge ERrOr In $ \lOg G $. howEVeR, usINg a Rotation CoRrEctioN schEME BAsed On tHe prOjectEd stellar rotaTioNal vELocIties $ \Left( v\Sin i\RiGht)  $ raTher thAn a scHeMe based on the truE steLlar rotatIonAl VelOcIties $ \LEft( v\riGht)  $ May Have resUlted in UNceRtAINTiEs also. The stellar roTaTIOn DecreaseS the efFEcTiVE temperaTuRe dEpenDINg on tHe inCLiNation anGle (smaLL cHaNge of $ T_{eFf} $ For $ i\apPrOx 0^{\cIrc } $ But laRGe chAnge of $ t_{eff} $ for $ i\ApproX 90^{\Circ } $) but the currENt rotation corREcTIOn SChemE caNnot distingUish BEtweEn thE CaSe oF Large $ V $ with SmALl $ I $ And the case of small $ v $ wItH large $ I $. Thus, Rotation correCtion using $ V\SIN i $ insteaD of $ v $ MAy CAuse uncertaintY in stEllar ages.

AGEs of Open clustErs
---------------------

The thEoretical EVOlutionaRy gRidS of @schALLeR92 were used to esTIMate AgEs of staRs fRom $ T_{eff} $ And $ \Log G $. To VerIfY that our aGe dating MeThOd Is WorKing, wE Applied tHe MetHoD to A few oPEn clusTers wIth aGeS dETerMined by OThER MethOdS – $ \aLpha  $ perSeUs (80 Myr), pleiADes (125 myr), NGC 6475 (220 MYr), M34 (225 Myr), and hyaDEs (660 MyR). THe Ages for The first two clUsTers are basEd On rEcent aPPLication Of the lithium depletion boUNdary meThoD (LDBM) (@perAGe and @StauFfeR99 for $ \alPha  $ pErseus; @stauffEr98 for plEiaDES). The aGES fOr tHe Other clustERS arE from UpPer mAin sequEnce isochrone fittiNG (UMsIF), and are takeN frOm @JoNESPRosSEr OR @LyNgA. the AGE
 is to enhance the stellar  main sequ enceage  by  a n av erag e of $ 40\% $. Ther efore, we included the  stel la r  rot a ti on co rrectio n  s u g ges te dby@F B 98 . How eve r, thei r rotation  co rr ection schem e sare availa ble  only for st ars  withsp ect r al ty pebetwe en app r oximat ely B7–A4 .W e exte n ded the r an ge o f rotation correc t io n  such that for  stars  e a rl i e r t han  B7, we us ed  thec orrecti o ns c h eme for B7 starsand for sta r s l ater t ha n A 4 , we u sed t he cor rection sch emefor A4 st ars. T h erefore ,  starsearlie r o r l ater th an  th eF igu e ra s & Bla si’s (19 98 )range  wil l h a ve m ore  unc ertai n ages.

Larg e u ncer t ain tiesin es tima te d age s aremainl ydue to the larg e er ror in $\lo gg $ .Howev e r, usi nga r otation  correc t ion  s c h e me  based on the proj ec t e dstellarrotati o na lv elocitie s$ \ left ( v\sin  i\r i gh t)  $ ra ther t h an  a  scheme  b ased o nthe  tr ue st e llar  rotat ional ve locit i es $ \left( v\ r ight)  $ mayh av e re s ulte d i n uncertain ties also . Th e  s tel l ar ro tatio nd ec r eases the effective  t empera turedepending onthe inclin a t i on angle  (sm a ll change of $ T_ {eff}  $ for $ i \ approx 0 ^{\ci rc } $ b ut largec h ange of$ T _{e ff}  $f o r$ i\approx 90 ^ { \cir c} $) bu t t he curr ent  ro tat ion  c orrection  schemeca nn ot  d ist ingui s h betwee nthe  c ase  of l a rge $v $ w ithsm al l  $i $ and th e case  o fsmal l $  v  $ wi th l a rge  $ i $.  Thus, ro tat i on c or re ction u sing $ v\sini$ insteadof  $v $ ma y cause un certainty in stellar ag e s.

Age s o f Ope n Cl usters
-- --- ------ --- - ------ 

Thetheor et ica l evolu t i on ary  g rids of @S c h all er92we re u sed toestimate ages of s t ars  from $ T_{ef f}$ an d $\lo g  g $.To ver i f y that our agedating met ho d  i s working, weap plied t he meth od to a few o pen clust ers withag es d e t erm ined by ot her meth ods – $ \ a lpha$Perse us(80 My r) , P leiad es (12 5  My r), N GC 647 5(220 M yr),M3 4 (225 M yr), and Hyades (660 My r). Th e age s f or the fi rst two  clusters  are  based onrec ent  appl ica t ion o f th e  l ith i um de plet i on bounda r ymet h o d(LDBM) (@Pe r A g e a nd @S tau f fer99for$ \alpha  $ Perse u s; @Stauffer98  for P lei ade s ). T he  ages for theoth er c lustersar e from uppe r main s eq u enceisochr one fi tting ( U M SI F ), and  are  ta ken from@Jo ne s Prosser  o r@ Lynga.  The  a ge
 is_to enhance_the stellar main sequence_age by_an_average of_$_40\% $. Therefore,_we included the_stellar rotation correction suggested_by @FB98. However,_their_rotation correction schemes are available only for stars with spectral type between approximately B7–A4._We_extended the_range_of_rotation correction such that for_stars earlier than B7, we_used the_correction scheme for B7 stars and for stars_later_than A4, we_used the correction scheme for A4 stars. Therefore, stars_earlier or later than the Figueras_& Blasi’s (1998)_range_will_have more uncertain ages.

Large_uncertainties in estimated ages are mainly_due to the large error in_$ \log g $. However, using a_rotation correction scheme based on the_projected stellar rotational velocities $_\left( v\sin_i\right)  $ rather than_a scheme based_on the_true stellar rotational_velocities $ \left( v\right)  $_may have resulted_in uncertainties also. The stellar rotation_decreases_the effective temperature_depending_on_the inclination_angle (small change_of_$ T_{eff}_$_for $ i\approx 0^{\circ } $_but_large change of $ T_{eff} $ for_$ i\approx 90^{\circ }_$)_but the current rotation_correction scheme cannot distinguish between_the case of large $ v_$ with_small $_i $ and the case of small $ v $ with_large $ i $. Thus, rotation_correction using $ v\sin_i $_instead_of $ v_$_may cause_uncertainty in stellar ages.

Ages of Open Clusters
---------------------

The_theoretical evolutionary_grids of @Schaller92 were used to_estimate ages of stars_from_$ T_{eff} $ and $ \log_g $. To verify that our_age dating method is working,_we_applied_the method to a few_open clusters with ages determined by_other methods –_$ \alpha  $ Perseus (80 Myr), Pleiades (125 Myr),_NGC 6475_(220 Myr), M34 (225 Myr), and Hyades (660 Myr)._The_ages for the first two clusters_are_based_on recent application of the_lithium depletion boundary method (LDBM) (@PerAge_and @Stauffer99 for $ \alpha  $ Perseus; @Stauffer98 for_Pleiades). The ages_for the other clusters are_from_upper_main sequence isochrone fitting (UMSIF), and are taken from @JonesProsser_or @Lynga._The age