 form a complete SO(10) multiplet and thus give zero contribution to $\Delta_i$. From Fig. \[fig:spectrum\] we see that from $M_c$ to $2 M_c$ there are more triplets than doublets. However from $2 M_c$ to $3 M_c$ the situation is reversed with more doublets than triplets. These two cases alternate as one goes up in energy and the net effect is to cancel each other. In the gauge sector the situation is slightly different. Complete gauge or $\Phi$ multiplets give zero contribution to the running. Again from Fig. \[fig:spectrum\] we see that from $M_c$ to $2 M_c$ the $\Phi \subset$ SM contribution is missing, while from $2 M_c$ to $3 M_c$ there is an excess of $V \subset$ SM. The net result gives $2/3$ of the gauge sector contribution in the MSSM. With these results we can now compare 5D and 4D SO(10).

In 5D we have (for $\mu \leq M_c$) & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + \_i \[eq:5D\]\
& = & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () Whereas in the 4D MSSM we have & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () \[eq:4D\] Using two loop RG running above the weak scale and one loop threshold corrections at $M_Z$ we find $M_{GUT} \simeq 3 \times 10^{16} \;
{\rm GeV}$. In addition the necessary GUT threshold correction, $\epsilon_3$, can be obtained with the color triplet Higgs $T, \;
\bar T$ mass $m_T \simeq 2 \times 10^{14} \;\; {\rm GeV}$ (see for example, Ref.  [@Murayama:2001ur]). From Eqns. (\[eq:5D\], \[eq:4D\]) it is easy to see that the 5D RG equation is equivalent to the 4D MSSM result if we take M\_c = m\_T, = ()\^, (M\_[GUT]{}) = (M\_\*). \[eq:gcunification\] We thus obtain gauge coupling unification with $ M
form a complete SO(10) multiplet and thus give zero contribution to $ \Delta_i$. From Fig. \[fig: spectrum\ ] we visualize that from $ M_c$ to $ 2 M_c$ there be more triplets than doublets. However from $ 2 M_c$ to $ 3 M_c$ the situation is turn back with more doublets than triplets. These two case alternate as one goes up in energy and the net effect is to cancel each early. In the gauge sector the situation is slightly different. accomplished gauge or $ \Phi$ multiplets give zero contribution to the running. Again from Fig. \[fig: spectrum\ ] we see that from $ M_c$ to $ 2 M_c$ the $ \Phi \subset$ SM contribution is miss, while from $ 2 M_c$ to $ 3 M_c$ there is an excess of $ V \subset$ master of science. The net result gives $ 2/3 $ of the gauge sector contribution in the MSSM. With these consequence we can now compare 5D and 4D SO(10). 

 In 5D we have (for $ \mu \leq M_c$) & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i () + \_i \[eq:5D\]\ 
 & = & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i () + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () Whereas in the 4D MSSM we have & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i () + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () \[eq:4D\ ] use two loop RG running above the weak scale and one loop topology threshold corrections at $ M_Z$ we find $ M_{GUT } \simeq 3 \times 10^{16 } \; 
 { \rm GeV}$. In addition the necessary GUT threshold correction, $ \epsilon_3 $, can be obtained with the color triplet Higgs $ T, \; 
 \bar T$ mass $ m_T \simeq 2 \times 10^{14 } \;\; { \rm GeV}$ (attend for example, Ref.   [ @Murayama:2001ur ]). From Eqns. (\[eq:5D\ ], \[eq:4D\ ]) it is easy to visit that the 5D RG equality is equivalent to the 4D MSSM leave if we take M\_c = m\_T, = () \^, (M\_[GUT ] { }) = (M\_\ *). \[eq: gcunification\ ] We thus obtain gauge coupling unification with $ M
 fogm a complete SO(10) multipltt and thus give eeeo convributikn to $\Deuta_i$. From Fig. \[fig:spectrum\] we swe thqt from $M_c$ to $2 M_c$ therd are morv tripletw then doublets. Howetsr from $2 M_c$ tk $3 M_c$ vhe situation ix reversed with more doutldtd than triplets. These two cases altqrnate ss one goes up ig entrgr ans the net effect is to cancel each other. Pn the gauge sectpr the situation is slightpy dlfferent. Complete hauge or $\Phu$ mujriplets give zero contgnbution to jhe running. Again from Fig. \[fig:spdctruk\] we see tyar fgmm $M_c$ to $2 M_r$ the $\Ihi \subset$ SM contribgtion ix missing, whilc frok $2 N_c$ to $3 M_c$ there is an excess of $V \subsej$ SM. The nat result gives $2/3$ of tye gaoge sactof covtrjbntikn in hhe MSSM. With these resuots we can now compsrq 5D and 4D SO(10).

In 5D we rade (for $\mu \leq M_c$) & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + \_i \[eq:5D\]\
& = & + t\^[MSAM]{}\_i ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () Whereas un the 4D MSSM we have & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_y ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () \[eq:4D\] Using two loop RG running above dhe wxay seqle ave lne loop threshold corrections at $M_Z$ we find $I_{FUU} \spmeq 3 \times 10^{16} \;
{\rm GcV}$. In addition the nfcrfsary GUT thrgshold ekrdection, $\epsilon_3$, caj be objained with the colpr triplet Higgs $T, \;
\bar T$ maws $m_T \simeq 2 \rimes 10^{14} \;\; {\rm GeV}$ (see for examplz, Ref.  [@Kuraysma:2001ur]). From Eqns. (\[eq:5D\], \[eq:4D\]) it js easy to dee that ffe 5D RG equation is exuivalenu to the 4D MSSM refult if wx takz M\_c = m\_T, = ()\^, (M\_[BUT]{}) = (M\_\*). \[eq:gcunififatiok\] We thus obtain gakge clu[ling uniflcation with $ M
form a complete SO(10) multiplet and thus contribution $\Delta_i$. From \[fig:spectrum\] we see M_c$ are more triplets doublets. However from M_c$ to $3 M_c$ the situation reversed with more doublets than triplets. These two cases alternate as one goes in energy and the net effect is to cancel each other. In the sector situation slightly Complete gauge or $\Phi$ multiplets give zero contribution to the running. Again from Fig. \[fig:spectrum\] we that from $M_c$ to $2 M_c$ the $\Phi SM contribution is missing, from $2 M_c$ to $3 there an excess $V SM. net result gives of the gauge sector contribution in the MSSM. With these results we can now compare 5D and SO(10). In have (for \leq & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( \_i \[eq:5D\]\ & = & + + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () Whereas in the 4D we have & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + (V) () \[eq:4D\] Using two loop RG running the weak scale and one loop threshold corrections at $M_Z$ we find $M_{GUT} \simeq 3 \; {\rm GeV}$. In the necessary GUT correction, can obtained the color Higgs $T, \; \bar T$ mass $m_T \simeq 2 \times 10^{14} {\rm GeV}$ (see for example, Ref. [@Murayama:2001ur]). From Eqns. (\[eq:5D\], is to see that 5D RG equation is to 4D MSSM result if M\_c m\_T, = \[eq:gcunification\] thus obtain gauge coupling with $ M
 form a complete SO(10) multiplet aNd thus give Zero cOntRibUtIon tO $\DelTa_i$. From Fig. \[fig:sPEctrUm\] we see that from $M_c$ to $2 M_c$ tHere aRe MOre tRIpLets tHan doubLEtS. hOweVeR fRom $2 m_c$ TO $3 M_C$ the sItuAtion is Reversed wiTh mOrE doublets thaN TrIplets. ThesE twO cases alternAte As one gOeS up IN enerGy aNd the Net effECt is to Cancel eacH oTHer. In tHE gauge sECToR the Situation is slightLY dIFferent. CompletE gauge Or $\pHi$ MULtiPleTs give zero CoNtribUTion to tHE rUNNIng. aGain from Fig. \[fiG:spectrum\] we SEe tHat froM $M_C$ to $2 m_C$ the $\PhI \subsEt$ sm coNtribution iS misSing, while From $2 M_c$ TO $3 M_c$ therE Is an excEss of $V \SubSet$ sM. ThE NeT rEsuLt GIveS $2/3$ Of The GAugE sector cOnTrIbutiOn in THE msSM. WIth ThesE resuLts we can now coMpaRe 5D aND 4D So(10).

In 5D wE have (For $\mU \lEq M_c$) & & + b\^[mSSM]{}\_i ( ) + \_i \[Eq:5D\]\
& = & + b\^[MsSm]{}\_i ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i (V) () Whereas iN the 4d MSSM we haVe & & + b\^[mSsM]{}\_i ( ) + B\^[Sm]{}\_i (V) () \[eq:4d\] using tWo lOop rG runniNg above THe wEaK SCAlE and one loop threshoLd CORrEctions aT $M_Z$ we fINd $m_{Gut} \simeq 3 \tiMeS 10^{16} \;
{\rm geV}$. IN ADditiOn thE NeCessary GuT threSHoLd CorrectIoN, $\epsilOn_3$, Can Be oBtainED witH the coLor triplEt HigGS $T, \;
\bar T$ mass $m_T \siMEq 2 \times 10^{14} \;\; {\rm GeV}$ (sEE fOR ExAMple, ref.  [@murayama:2001ur]). FRom EQNs. (\[eq:5d\], \[eq:4D\]) IT iS eaSY to seE that ThE 5d Rg Equation is equivalenT tO the 4D MsSM reSult if we take M\_C = m\_T, = ()\^, (M\_[GUT]{}) = (M\_\*). \[eq:GCUNificatiOn\] We THuS Obtain gauge couPling UnificatioN With $ M
 form a complete SO(10) mu ltiplet an d thu s g ive  z erocont ribution to $\ D elta _i$. From Fig. \[fig:s pectr um \ ] we se e tha t from$ M_ c $  to  $ 2M_c $t he re ar e m ore tri plets than  do ub lets. Howeve r  f rom $2 M_c $ t o $3 M_c$ th e s ituati on  is rever sed  with  mored oublet s than tr ip l ets. T h ese two c as es a lternate as one g o es up in energy a nd the  n e te f fec t i s to cance leacho ther. I n  t h e gau g e sector thesituation i s  sl ightly  d iff e rent.Compl et e  ga uge or $\Ph i$ m ultiplets  givez ero con t ributio n to t herun ning .  A ga infr o m F i g.  \[ f ig: spectrum \]  w e see  tha t f r om $ M_c $ to  $2 M _c$ the $\Phi  \s ubse t $ S M con tribu tion  i s mis sing,while  f rom $2 M_c$ to$3 M _c$ there  is  a n e xc ess o f  $V \s ubs et$  SM. Th e net r e sul tg i v es  $2/3$ of the gaug es e ct or contr ibutio n  i nt he MSSM.  W ith  the s e  resu ltsw ecan nowcompar e  5 Dand 4DSO (10).
I n 5 D w e hav e  (fo r $\mu  \leq M_ c$) & & + b\^[MSSM]{ } \_i ( ) + \_i \[ e q :5 D \]\& =  & + b\^[MS SM]{ } \_i( )+  b \^[ S M]{}\ _i (V )( )W hereas in the 4D MS SM  we ha ve && + b\^[MSSM] {}\_i ( )+ b \^[SM]{} \_i( V) () \[eq:4D\] U singtwo loop R G  running  abov e the we ak scalea n d one lo opthr esh old c or rections at $ M _ Z$ w efind $M _{G UT} \si meq  3\ti mes  1 0^{16} \; 
{\rm Ge V} $.  I nadd ition the nece ss ary  G UTthres h old co rrect ion,  $ \e p sil on_3$,c an b e ob ta in ed w ith  t he co lort rip let Hig gs $T, \; 
\b a r T$  m as s $m_T\simeq 2 \tim es  10^{14} \ ;\ ; { \rm Ge V } $ (see f or example, Ref.  [@Mur a yama:20 01u r]).From  Eqns. (\ [eq :5D\],  \[ e q:4D\] ) it i s eas ytos e e tha t th e 5 DRG equatio n isequiv al entto the4D MSSM result ifw e t ake M\_c = m\ _T,  = ( ) \ ^,  (M \ _[ G UT] {} )  =( M \_\*). \[eq:gcu nification \] We  thus obta i n g au ge coup ling un ifica t ion wit h $ M
 form_a complete_SO(10) multiplet and thus_give zero_contribution_to $\Delta_i$._From_Fig. \[fig:spectrum\] we_see that from_$M_c$ to $2 M_c$_there are more_triplets_than doublets. However from $2 M_c$ to $3 M_c$ the situation is reversed with_more_doublets than_triplets._These_two cases alternate as one_goes up in energy and_the net_effect is to cancel each other. In the_gauge_sector the situation_is slightly different. Complete gauge or $\Phi$ multiplets give_zero contribution to the running. Again_from Fig. \[fig:spectrum\]_we_see_that from $M_c$ to_$2 M_c$ the $\Phi \subset$ SM_contribution is missing, while from $2_M_c$ to $3 M_c$ there is an_excess of $V \subset$ SM. The_net result gives $2/3$ of_the gauge_sector contribution in the MSSM._With these results_we can_now compare 5D_and 4D SO(10).

In 5D we have_(for $\mu \leq_M_c$) & & + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i (_)_+ \_i \[eq:5D\]\
&_=_&_+ b\^[MSSM]{}\_i_( ) +_b\^[SM]{}\_i_(V) ()_Whereas_in the 4D MSSM we have_&_& + b\^[MSSM]{}\_i ( ) + b\^[SM]{}\_i_(V) () \[eq:4D\] Using_two_loop RG running above_the weak scale and one_loop threshold corrections at $M_Z$ we_find $M_{GUT}_\simeq 3_\times 10^{16} \;
{\rm GeV}$. In addition the necessary GUT threshold correction,_$\epsilon_3$, can be obtained with the_color triplet Higgs $T,_\;
\bar T$_mass_$m_T \simeq 2_\times_10^{14} \;\;_{\rm GeV}$ (see for example, Ref.  [@Murayama:2001ur])._From Eqns._(\[eq:5D\], \[eq:4D\]) it is easy to_see that the 5D_RG_equation is equivalent to the 4D_MSSM result if we take M\_c_= m\_T, = ()\^, (M\_[GUT]{})_=_(M\_\*)._\[eq:gcunification\] We thus obtain gauge_coupling unification with $ M