 1991; Bromley et al. 1997; Zhang at al. 1997; Nowak et al. 1997; Cui et al. 1998; Stella et al. 1999; Wagoner et al. 2001; Abramowicz & Kluzniak 2001). Although varying degrees of success have been achieved, it is fair to say that the techniques all have serious issues in their applications to the data. Further investigation, both theoretical and observational, is thus needed to examine the issues.

We have demonstrated in this work that the high quality of the data is starting to demand a proper treatment of electron scattering in radiative transfer through the accretion disk around a stellar-mass black hole. Some of the effects that were not appreciated previously in fitting low S/N data are now becoming apparent. At present, this demanding situation fundamentally limits our ability to reliably derive the physical parameters of the accretion disk or the black hole in an X-ray binary, based on modeling the disk X-ray continuum. There are also observational issues that add additional uncertainties to the exercise. For instance, many key parameters (e.g., black hole mass, inclination angle, and distance) that characterize a source are often poorly determined but are needed to determine, e.g., the black hole spin. This is entirely independent of the quality of X-ray data. Also, perhaps less appreciated are the significant uncertainties in the absolute and cross calibrations of the detectors on different X-ray satellites. This issue is relevant, because the determination of the spin of a black hole in an X-ray binary depends critically on the overall normalization of the X-ray continuum. This is the reason why one must be very careful in comparing results based on data from different satellites.

We have shown that neither of the two state-of-the-art disk models is capable of satisfactorily fitting the observed ultra-soft component of the spectra of GX 339$-$4. While this is perhaps not totally surprising for “kerrbb”, since it does not actually carry out radiative transfer calculations, it is for “bhspec”. These models have recently been applied to data to derive the spin of black holes in a number of systems, so our finding is somewhat disappointing. If we take the best-fit parameters at their face values, the models would suggest that GX 339$-$4 contains a moderately rotating black hole (with $a^* \sim$ 0.5–0.6). On the other hand, if we attribute the asymmetry in the profile
1991; Bromley et al. 1997; Zhang at al. 1997; Nowak et al. 1997; Cui et al. 1998; Stella et al. 1999; Wagoner et al. 2001; Abramowicz & Kluzniak 2001). Although varying degrees of success have been achieved, it is clean to suppose that the techniques all have serious issue in their applications to the data. Further probe, both theoretical and observational, is thus needed to analyze the issues. 

 We have demonstrated in this oeuvre that the high quality of the datum is starting to demand a proper treatment of electron scattering in radiative transfer through the accretion disk around a stellar - batch black hole. Some of the effects that were not appreciate previously in fitting low S / N data are now become apparent. At present, this demanding situation fundamentally limits our ability to reliably deduce the physical parameters of the accretion disk or the black hole in an X - re binary, based on modeling the disk X - ray continuum. There are also observational issues that lend additional uncertainties to the use. For case, many cardinal parameters (e.g., black hole mass, inclination angle, and distance) that characterize a source are frequently poorly determined but are needed to determine, e.g., the black trap spin. This is entirely independent of the quality of ten - ray datum. besides, possibly less appreciated are the significant uncertainties in the absolute and cross calibrations of the detectors on different X - ray satellite. This issue is relevant, because the determination of the spin of a black trap in an X - beam binary depends critically on the overall standardization of the X - ray continuum. This is the reason why one must be very careful in comparing consequence based on datum from different satellites. 

 We have shown that neither of the two department of state - of - the - artwork disk models is capable of satisfactorily fit the observed ultra - soft part of the spectra of GX 339$-$4. While this is perhaps not totally surprising for “ kerrbb ”, since it does not actually carry out radiative transportation calculations, it is for “ bhspec ”. These models have recently been applied to data to derive the spin of black trap in a number of systems, so our finding is somewhat disappointing. If we take the better - fit argument at their boldness values, the models would suggest that GX   339$-$4 contains a moderately rotating bootleg hole (with $ a^ * \sim$ 0.5–0.6). On the other hand, if we attribute the asymmetry in the profile
 1991; Bgomley et al. 1997; Zhang at au. 1997; Nowak et al. 1997; Cui et al. 1998; Sfella et al. 1999; Wagoner et al. 2001; Abramowirz & Jluznuak 2001). Although varying aegrees ov succesw hate been achieved, it is fair to day chet the techniqugs all have verious issues iv cheir applications to the data. Furthqr invextlgation, both treorttisal znd observational, is thus needed tk examiie the issues.

We have demonstrated in this worn that the high quwlity of thg daeq is startine to demand a proper tteatment of electron scattering kn rabiative trabsder jhrough the eccretpon disk aroukc a stallar-maxs black hole. Xomx of the effects that werx not appreciated prgviously it yitting low S/N data aee now tecoking qppxreht. Af presfnt, this demahding situarion fundamentally kiipys our abilify to wejiably derive the physical parameters ox tge accretion disk or thw black hole in an X-rwy binary, based on modeling the disk X-ray continuum. There dre amro ibfdevwtional issues that add additional uncertaintyss tp the exercise. For instanve, msgy key paramejers (e.g., blzck hole mass, incllnation anglw, and disuance) that characterize a source are often pjirly determined buc are needed to ceterkine, e.g., the black hole rpin. This is enhirely insdpendent of the duakidy of X-ray data. Also, perha[s less a'precnated ard thg signisicant uncfrtaikdies in the absoluhe anb crovs calibrahions of the detectors on diffecxnt X-ray sateklhtev. This ifsue ls relevant, becwuse the deterkinatiou of tfe spin of a blacn hole in ag X-ray binary fepends critmcally on the oveeall nofoalization of yhe X-ray boutinuum. Tyis is the reason xhy uhe must be very catwful in comparong refuptx fdsed on data froo dkgferevt satellitcs.

Wd hafe shown that neithes of the two state-of-thr-avt disk midels is capable of sstisfactorily fittlng tie obsxrved iltta-soft component of the spectra of GX 339$-$4. Wjilc this is perraps not totally surprising for “kerrbb”, since it does nov actually carry out raeiative transfer cakgulations, it is fjr “bhspec”. These models have rwcently been applled to data to derive fhe sphn of black holes in a number of systems, so our finding is somewhat disappointung. If we take the besy-fit iarcmecers at themr face values, the models would suggest that GX 339$-$4 cuntains d ioderately rotating black hoke (with $a^* \sim$ 0.5–0.6). Un the other hand, if we zttributr the asymmetry in the profile
1991; Bromley et al. 1997; Zhang at Nowak al. 1997; et al. 1998; et 2001; Abramowicz & 2001). Although varying of success have been achieved, it fair to say that the techniques all have serious issues in their applications the data. Further investigation, both theoretical and observational, is thus needed to examine issues. have in work that the high quality of the data is starting to demand a proper treatment of scattering in radiative transfer through the accretion disk a stellar-mass black hole. of the effects that were appreciated in fitting S/N are becoming apparent. At this demanding situation fundamentally limits our ability to reliably derive the physical parameters of the accretion disk the black an X-ray based modeling disk X-ray continuum. also observational issues that add additional exercise. For instance, many key parameters (e.g., black mass, inclination and distance) that characterize a source often poorly determined but are needed to determine, the black hole spin. This is entirely independent of the quality of X-ray data. Also, appreciated are the significant in the absolute cross of detectors different X-ray This issue is relevant, because the determination of the spin of black hole in an X-ray binary depends critically on the of X-ray continuum. This the reason why one be careful in comparing results data different shown neither the two state-of-the-art disk is capable of satisfactorily fitting observed ultra-soft component of While this is perhaps not totally surprising for since it does not actually carry out transfer calculations, it is for “bhspec”. These models have recently been applied data to spin of black holes in a number of so our finding is disappointing. If we take the best-fit parameters at their values, models would that GX 339$-$4 a moderately rotating hole (with $a^* On the hand, we in the profile
 1991; Bromley et al. 1997; Zhang at al. 1997; Nowak Et al. 1997; Cui et aL. 1998; StelLa eT al. 1999; waGoneR et aL. 2001; Abramowicz & KluZNiak 2001). although varying degrees Of sucCeSS havE BeEn achIeved, it IS fAIR to SaY tHat ThE TeChniqUes All have Serious issUes In Their applicaTIoNs to the datA. FuRther investiGatIon, botH tHeoREticaL anD obseRvatioNAl, is thUs needed tO eXAmine tHE issues.

wE HaVe deMonstrated in this wORk THat the high qualIty of tHe DAtA IS stArtIng to demanD a PropeR TreatmeNT oF ELEctROn scattering iN radiative tRAnsFer thrOuGh tHE accreTion dIsK AroUnd a stellar-Mass Black hole. some of THe effecTS that weRe not aPprEciAted PReViOusLy IN fiTTiNg lOW S/N Data are nOw BeCominG appARENT. At pResEnt, tHis deManding situatIon FundAMenTally LimitS our AbIlity To reliAbly dErIve the physical pAramEters of thE acCrEtiOn Disk oR The blaCk hOle In an X-raY binary, BAseD oN MODeLing the disk X-ray conTiNUUm. there are Also obSErVaTIonal issUeS thAt adD ADditiOnal UNcErtaintiEs to thE ExErCise. For InStance, MaNy kEy pArameTErs (e.G., black Hole mass, IncliNAtion angle, and dIStance) that chaRAcTERiZE a soUrcE are often poOrly DEterMineD BuT arE NeedeD to deTeRMiNE, e.g., the black hole spin. thIs is enTirelY independent oF the qualitY OF x-ray data. also, PErHAps less appreciAted aRe the signiFIcant uncErtaiNties in tHe absolutE ANd cross cAliBraTioNs oF THe Detectors on diFFErenT X-Ray sateLliTes. This IssUe iS reLevAnT, because tHe determInAtIoN oF thE spin OF a black hOlE in An x-raY binaRY depenDs criTicaLlY oN The Overall NOrMALizaTiOn Of thE X-rAy ContiNuum. tHis Is the reAson why onE muST be vErY cAreful iN comparing resUlTs based on dAtA frOm diffEREnt satelLites.

We have shown that neiTHer of thE twO statE-of-tHe-art disk ModEls is cApaBLe of saTisfacTorilY fIttING the oBSErVed UlTra-soft comPONenT of thE sPectRa of GX 339$-$4. WHile this is perhaps nOT toTally surprisiNg fOr “keRRBb”, SinCE iT DoeS nOT acTUAlly carry out radIative tranSfER cAlculationS, It iS fOr “bhspeC”. These mOdels HAve receNtly been aPplied to dAtA to dERIve The spin of bLack holeS in a numbeR Of sysTEmS, so ouR fiNding iS sOmeWhat dIsappoINtiNg. If wE take tHe Best-fiT paraMeTers at thEir face values, the models wOuld suGgest ThaT GX 339$-$4 contaiNs a MOdeRately rotAtinG black hole (WitH $a^* \sIm$ 0.5–0.6). On tHe oTHer haNd, if WE aTtrIBute tHe asYMmetry in tHE pRofILE
 1991; Bromley et al. 1997 ; Zhang at  al.199 7;No waket a l. 1997; Cui e t  al.  1998; Stella et al. 1 999;Wa g oner et  al.2001; A b ra m o wic z&Klu zn i ak  2001 ).Althoug h varyingdeg re es of succes s  h ave been a chi eved, it isfai r to s ay  th a t the  te chniq ues al l  haveserious i ss u es int heir ap p l ic atio ns to the data. F u rt h er investigati on, bo th th e o ret ica l and obse rv ation a l, is t h us n e ede d  to examine t he issues.Wehave d em ons t ratedin th is wor k that thehigh  qualityof the data is startin g to d ema nda pr o pe rtre at m ent of  el e ctr on scatt er in g inradi a t i v e tr ans ferthrou gh the accret ion  dis k  ar ounda ste llar -m ass b lack h ole.So me of the effec ts t hat werenot  a ppr ec iated previo usl y i n fitti ng lowS /Nda t a ar e now becoming app ar e n t.  At pres ent, t h is  d e mandingsi tua tion f undam enta l ly  limitsour ab i li ty  to rel ia bly de ri vethe  phys i calparame ters ofthe a c cretion disk o r  the black ho l ei n  a n  X-r aybinary, bas ed o n  mod elin g  t hed isk X -rayco n ti n uum. There are also  o bserva tiona l issues that  add addit i o n al uncer tain t ie s  to the exerci se. F or instanc e , many k ey pa rameters  (e.g., b l a ck holemas s,inc lin a t io n angle, andd i stan ce ) thatcha racteri zea s our cear e often p oorly de te rm in ed  bu t are needed t odet er min e, e. g ., the  blac k ho le  s p in.  This i s  e n t irel yin depe nde nt  of t he q u ali ty of X -ray data . A l so,pe rh aps les s appreciated  a re the sig ni fic ant un c e rtaintie s in the absolute and c r oss cal ibr ation s of  the dete cto rs ondif f erentX-raysatel li tes . Thisi s su e i srelevant,b e cau se th edete rminati on of the spin ofa  bl ack hole in a n X -ray b in ary de p end sc rit i c ally on the ove rall norma li z at ion of the X-r ay  contin uum. Th is is the rea son why o ne must b every c are ful in com paring r esults ba s ed on da ta fr omdiffer en t s atell ites.Wehaveshownth at nei therof  the two  state-of-the-art diskmodels  is c apa ble of sa tis f act orily fit ting  the obser ved  ul tra-s oft compo nent of  th e  spec trao f GX 339$ - $4 . W h i le  this is pe r h a psnot t ota l ly sur pris ing for “kerrbb”, since it doesnota c tua lly carr yout radiativetra ns f e r calcul at ions, it is  for “bh sp e c”. T hese m odelshave re c e nt l y been  app lie d to data  to  d e rive th esp i n of b lack  h oles i n a nu m bero f  systems, so our  find i n g iss ome whatdi sappoin t ing.  If we tak e the best- fit pa rame tersat thei rface v alu es , the mode l s would s ugges t thatGX  339 $-$ 4 cont ains a  mode rate ly  ro tating bl a c kh ol e( wit h $a ^* \s im $ 0. 5–0.6). O n  the oth erh and, if  w e a t t ribute th e asymmetryinthe p r o file
 1991;_Bromley et_al. 1997; Zhang at_al. 1997;_Nowak_et al._1997;_Cui et al._1998; Stella et_al. 1999; Wagoner et_al. 2001; Abramowicz_&_Kluzniak 2001). Although varying degrees of success have been achieved, it is fair to_say_that the_techniques_all_have serious issues in their_applications to the data. Further_investigation, both_theoretical and observational, is thus needed to examine_the_issues.

We have demonstrated_in this work that the high quality of the_data is starting to demand a_proper treatment of_electron_scattering_in radiative transfer through_the accretion disk around a stellar-mass_black hole. Some of the effects_that were not appreciated previously in fitting_low S/N data are now becoming_apparent. At present, this demanding_situation fundamentally_limits our ability to reliably_derive the physical_parameters of_the accretion disk_or the black hole in an_X-ray binary, based_on modeling the disk X-ray continuum._There_are also observational_issues_that_add additional_uncertainties to the_exercise._For instance,_many_key parameters (e.g., black hole mass,_inclination_angle, and distance) that characterize a source_are often poorly determined_but_are needed to determine,_e.g., the black hole spin._This is entirely independent of the_quality of_X-ray data._Also, perhaps less appreciated are the significant uncertainties in the absolute_and cross calibrations of the detectors_on different X-ray satellites._This issue_is_relevant, because the_determination_of the_spin of a black hole in an_X-ray binary_depends critically on the overall normalization_of the X-ray continuum._This_is the reason why one must_be very careful in comparing results_based on data from different_satellites.

We_have_shown that neither of the_two state-of-the-art disk models is capable_of satisfactorily fitting_the observed ultra-soft component of the spectra_of_GX 339$-$4. While this is perhaps_not_totally surprising for “kerrbb”, since it_does_not_actually carry out radiative transfer_calculations, it is for “bhspec”. These_models have recently been applied to data to derive_the spin of_black holes in a number_of_systems,_so our finding is somewhat disappointing. If we take the_best-fit parameters_at their face_values, the models would suggest that GX 339$-$4 contains a moderately_rotating black hole (with $a^* \sim$ 0.5–0.6)._On the other hand, if we attribute the asymmetry in the_profile