^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ Here, $\aleph$ refers to one of the three time-independent formulas (direct, cyclic, or reduced), $\div$ to the disentanglement, and $\ast\ast$ to the regularization of energy denominators required to make the reduced formula well-defined. Equation  is understood to imply a reordering of the perturbation contributions such that a given order $n \in\{1,\ldots, N\}$ involves only diagrams for which $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Ncounting}
\mathscr{N}(V)+\mathscr{N}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N m \mathscr{N}(U_m) =n \in\{1,\ldots, N\},\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathscr{N}(V)$ is the number of $V$ vertices, and $\mathscr{N}(U_1)$ and $\mathscr{N}(U_n)$ the number of $-U_1$ and $-U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n$ vertices, respectively. This can be implemented by writing Eq.  as $$\begin{aligned}
H = \underbrace{(U_0+U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div})}_{H_\text{ref}} + \lambda V - \lambda U_1-\sum_{n=2}^N\lambda^n  U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n\end{aligned}$$ and ordering the perturbation series with respect to powers of $\lambda$ (which is at the end set to $\lambda=1$).

For each truncation order $N$, the three schemes constitute three (different, for ${N>1}$) stationary points of MBPT. Related to this, in each of the three schemes the (direct, cyclic and reduced, respectively) contributions from anomalous diagrams are removed, and in each scheme the relation between the particle number and the chemical potential matches the adiabatic relation, i.e., $$\begin{aligned}
U=U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; 
\varrho(T,\mu)=
-\frac{\partial \Omega(T,\mu)}{\partial\mu}=\sum_{{\textbf}{k}} n_{\textbf}{k},\end{aligned}$$ so $F(T,\mu)=F(T,\mu_\text{ref})$ holds in each scheme
^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ Here, $ \aleph$ refers to one of the three time - independent formulas (lineal, cyclic, or reduce), $ \div$ to the disentanglement, and $ \ast\ast$ to the regularization of department of energy denominators want to make the reduced recipe well - defined. Equation    is understand to imply a reordering of the perturbation contribution such that a given order $ n \in\{1,\ldots, N\}$ involve merely diagrams for which $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{Ncounting } 
 \mathscr{N}(V)+\mathscr{N}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N m \mathscr{N}(U_m) = n \in\{1,\ldots, N\},\end{aligned}$$ where $ \mathscr{N}(V)$ is the number of $ V$ vertices, and $ \mathscr{N}(U_1)$ and $ \mathscr{N}(U_n)$ the number of $ -U_1 $ and $ -U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n$ vertices, respectively. This can be implement by writing Eq.    as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 H = \underbrace{(U_0+U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div})}_{H_\text{ref } } + \lambda V - \lambda U_1-\sum_{n=2}^N\lambda^n   U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n\end{aligned}$$ and ordering the perturbation serial with respect to powers of $ \lambda$ (which is at the goal set to $ \lambda=1 $). 

 For each shortness order $ N$, the three schema constitute three (different, for $ { N>1}$) stationary points of MBPT. refer to this, in each of the three schemes the (direct, cyclic and reduced, respectively) contributions from anomalous diagrams are murder, and in each scheme the relation between the particle number and the chemical potential matches the adiabatic relation, i.e., $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 U = U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; 
 \varrho(T,\mu)= 
 -\frac{\partial \Omega(T,\mu)}{\partial\mu}=\sum_{{\textbf}{k } } n_{\textbf}{k},\end{aligned}$$ so $ F(T,\mu)=F(T,\mu_\text{ref})$ holds in each scheme
^{\aleoh,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ Htre, $\aleph$ refers jo one oh the tgree timd-independent formulas (direct, ctclic, or reduced), $\div$ to the disentanhlement, qnd $\est\ast$ to the rejhlarizabnon or enexgb denominators tequired to kake the reducad flrmula well-defined. Equation  is undewstood yo imply a reordgring jf tgv kerturbation contributions such tgat a gpven order $n \in\{1,\ldpts, N\}$ involves only diagrals flr which $$\begin{aligjed}
\label{Ncoohtigt}
\mathscr{N}(V)+\maghscr{N}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N m \mathscr{H}(U_m) =n \in\{1,\ldots, N\},\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathxcr{N}(V)$ is tye nulter of $V$ vectices, and $\mathscr{K}(L_1)$ and $\mdthscr{N}(I_n)$ the number pf $-N_1$ ane $-U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n$ vectices, respectively. Jhis can ba nmplemented by writint Wq.  as $$\beghn{alktnea}
H = \uidedbrace{(K_0+U^{\ameph,(\ast\ast),\siv})}_{H_\text{ref}} + \lambda V - \lambda I_1-\stn_{n=2}^N\lambda^n  U^{\zleph,(\aft\wst),\div}_n\end{aligned}$$ and ordering the pertlrbafion series with respecr to powers of $\lambda$ (which is at the end set to $\lambda=1$).

For each truncation ordes $N$, tie thxcc scfwmfs constitute three (different, for ${N>1}$) stationarr ppikts of MBPT. Relabed to this, in eacn lf jhe three scheoes thz (djrect, cyclic and rfduced, tespecrively) cogtrinutions from anomalous diageams are remjced, and in each sckeme the relction netwern the particle number cnd ths chemical ootential oatches the adiacatpc ralation, i.e., $$\begin{aligned}
U=U^{\ajeph,(\ast\asv),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; 
\rarrho(T,\mj)=
-\frav{\partiwl \Omega(T,\mk)}{\partldl\mu}=\sum_{{\textbf}{k}} n_{\tedtbf}{k},\gnd{alicned}$$ so $F(T,\lu)=F(T,\mu_\text{ref})$ holds in each schxke
^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ Here, $\aleph$ refers to one of time-independent (direct, cyclic, reduced), $\div$ to the of energy denominators to make the formula well-defined. Equation is understood to a reordering of the perturbation contributions such that a given order $n \in\{1,\ldots, involves only diagrams for which $$\begin{aligned} \label{Ncounting} \mathscr{N}(V)+\mathscr{N}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N m \mathscr{N}(U_m) =n \in\{1,\ldots, N\},\end{aligned}$$ $\mathscr{N}(V)$ the of vertices, and $\mathscr{N}(U_1)$ and $\mathscr{N}(U_n)$ the number of $-U_1$ and $-U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n$ vertices, respectively. This can be by writing Eq. as $$\begin{aligned} H = \underbrace{(U_0+U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div})}_{H_\text{ref}} \lambda V - \lambda U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n\end{aligned}$$ and ordering the perturbation with to powers $\lambda$ is the end set $\lambda=1$). For each truncation order $N$, the three schemes constitute three (different, for ${N>1}$) stationary points of Related to each of three the cyclic and reduced, from anomalous diagrams are removed, and the relation between the particle number and the potential matches adiabatic relation, i.e., $$\begin{aligned} U=U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; \varrho(T,\mu)= \Omega(T,\mu)}{\partial\mu}=\sum_{{\textbf}{k}} n_{\textbf}{k},\end{aligned}$$ so $F(T,\mu)=F(T,\mu_\text{ref})$ holds in each scheme
^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ here, $\aleph$ rEfers To oNe oF tHe thRee tIme-independent FOrmuLas (direct, cyclic, or reducEd), $\div$ To THe diSEnTanglEment, anD $\AsT\ASt$ tO tHe RegUlARiZatioN of Energy dEnominatorS reQuIred to make thE ReDuced formuLa wEll-defined. EqUatIon  is uNdErsTOod to ImpLy a reOrderiNG of the PerturbatIoN ContriBUtions sUCH tHat a Given order $n \in\{1,\ldotS, n\}$ iNVolves only diagRams foR wHIcH $$\BEgiN{alIgned}
\label{ncOuntiNG}
\mathscR{n}(V)+\MATHscR{n}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N m \mathsCr{N}(U_m) =n \in\{1,\ldoTS, N\},\eNd{aligNeD}$$ whERe $\mathScr{N}(V)$ Is THe nUmber of $V$ verTiceS, and $\mathsCr{N}(U_1)$ anD $\Mathscr{n}(u_n)$ the nuMber of $-u_1$ anD $-U^{\aLeph,(\ASt\AsT),\diV}_n$ VErtICeS, reSPecTively. ThIs CaN be imPlemENTED by wRitIng EQ.  as $$\beGin{aligned}
H = \unDerBracE{(u_0+U^{\aLeph,(\aSt\ast),\Div})}_{H_\TeXt{ref}} + \Lambda v - \lambDa u_1-\sum_{n=2}^N\lambda^n  U^{\aLeph,(\Ast\ast),\div}_N\enD{aLigNeD}$$ and oRDering The PerTurbatiOn serieS WitH rESPEcT to powers of $\lambda$ (wHiCH Is At the end Set to $\lAMbDa=1$).

fOr each trUnCatIon oRDEr $N$, thE thrEE sChemes coNstituTE tHrEe (diffeReNt, for ${N>1}$) StAtiOnaRy poiNTs of mBPT. ReLated to tHis, in EAch of the three sCHemes the (direcT, CyCLIc ANd reDucEd, respectivEly) cONtriButiONs FroM AnomaLous dIaGRaMS are removed, and in eacH sCheme tHe relAtion between tHe particle NUMBer and thE cheMIcAL potential matcHes thE adiabatic RElation, i.E., $$\begiN{aligned}
u=U^{\aleph,(\asT\ASt),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; 
\varRho(t,\mu)=
-\FraC{\paRTIaL \Omega(T,\mu)}{\partIAL\mu}=\sUm_{{\Textbf}{k}} N_{\teXtbf}{k},\enD{alIgnEd}$$ sO $F(T,\Mu)=f(T,\mu_\text{rEf})$ holds iN eAcH sChEme
^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_ n.\end{ali gned} $$Her e,  $\a leph $ refers to on e  ofthe three time-indepen dentfo r mula s  ( direc t, cycl i c, o r r ed uc ed) ,$ \d iv$ t o t he dise ntanglemen t,an d $\ast\ast$ to  the regul ari zation of en erg y deno mi nat o rs re qui red t o make the re duced for mu l a well - defined . Eq uati on  is understood to imply a reorde ring o ft he p ert urb ation cont ri butio n s sucht ha t a  gi v en order $n \ in\{1,\ldot s , N \}$ in vo lve s  onlydiagr am s  fo r which $$\ begi n{aligned }
\lab e l{Ncoun t ing}
\m athscr {N} (V) +\ma t hs cr {N} (U _ 1)+ \ su m_{ m =2} ^N m \ma th sc r{N}( U_m) = n \in\ {1, \ldo ts, N \},\end{align ed} $$ w h ere  $\ma thscr {N}( V) $ isthe nu mberof  $V$ vertices,and$\mathscr {N} (U _1) $and $ \ mathsc r{N }(U _n)$ th e numbe r  of  $ - U _ 1$  and $-U^{\aleph,( \a s t \a st),\div }_n$ v e rt ic e s, respe ct ive ly.T h is ca n be im plemente d by w r it in g Eq. as  $$\be gi n{a lig ned}H  = \ underb race{(U_ 0+U^{ \ aleph,(\ast\as t ),\div})}_{H_ \ te x t {r e f}}+ \ lambda V -\lam b da U _1-\ s um _{n = 2}^N\ lambd a^ n  U ^{\aleph,(\ast\ast) ,\ div}_n \end{ aligned}$$ an d ordering t h e pertur bati o ns eries with res pectto powerso f $\lamb da$ ( which is  at the e n d  set to$\l amb da= 1$) . 
F or each trunc a t ionor der $N$ , t he thre e s che mes  co ns titute th ree (dif fe re nt ,for  ${N> 1 }$) stat io nar ypoi nts o f  MBPT.  Rela tedto  t h is,  in eac h  o f theth re e sc hem es  the(dir e ct,  cyclic  and redu ced ,  res pe ct ively)contributions  f rom anomal ou s d iagram s are remo ved, and in each scheme the rel ati on be twee n the par tic le num ber and th e chem icalpo ten t i al ma t c he s t he  adiabatic r ela tion,  i .e.,  $$\beg in{aligned}
U=U^{\ a lep h,(\ast\ast), \di v}:\ ; \ ;\ ;\; \ ;\va rr h o(T , \ mu)=
-\frac{\pa rtial \Ome ga ( T, \mu)}{\par t ial \m u}=\sum _{{\tex tbf}{ k }} n_{\ textbf}{k },\end{al ig ned} $ $  so  $F(T,\mu) =F(T,\mu _\text{re f })$ h o ld s ineac h sche me 
^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n.\end{aligned}$$ Here,_$\aleph$ refers_to one of the_three time-independent_formulas_(direct, cyclic,_or_reduced), $\div$ to_the disentanglement, and_$\ast\ast$ to the regularization_of energy denominators_required_to make the reduced formula well-defined. Equation  is understood to imply a reordering of_the_perturbation contributions_such_that_a given order $n \in\{1,\ldots,_N\}$ involves only diagrams for_which $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Ncounting}
\mathscr{N}(V)+\mathscr{N}(U_1)+\sum_{m=2}^N_m \mathscr{N}(U_m) =n \in\{1,\ldots, N\},\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathscr{N}(V)$ is_the_number of $V$_vertices, and $\mathscr{N}(U_1)$ and $\mathscr{N}(U_n)$ the number of $-U_1$_and $-U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n$ vertices, respectively. This can_be implemented by_writing_Eq. _as $$\begin{aligned}
H = \underbrace{(U_0+U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div})}_{H_\text{ref}}_+ \lambda V - \lambda U_1-\sum_{n=2}^N\lambda^n_ U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}_n\end{aligned}$$ and ordering the perturbation_series with respect to powers of $\lambda$_(which is at the end set_to $\lambda=1$).

For each truncation order_$N$, the_three schemes constitute three (different,_for ${N>1}$) stationary_points of_MBPT. Related to_this, in each of the three_schemes the (direct,_cyclic and reduced, respectively) contributions from_anomalous_diagrams are removed,_and_in_each scheme_the relation between_the_particle number_and_the chemical potential matches the adiabatic_relation,_i.e., $$\begin{aligned}
U=U^{\aleph,(\ast\ast),\div}:\;\;\;\;\; 
\varrho(T,\mu)=
-\frac{\partial \Omega(T,\mu)}{\partial\mu}=\sum_{{\textbf}{k}} n_{\textbf}{k},\end{aligned}$$ so $F(T,\mu)=F(T,\mu_\text{ref})$_holds in each scheme