 is $+0.4\%$ for Cs and $+0.9\%$ for Tl, Pb and Bi. The value of the Breit correction in Cs is $-0.6\%$, see Refs. [@Der; @Dzuba3]. The Breit correction scales practically linearly with Z, see Ref.[@Sushkov]. Therefore, for Tl, Pb, and Bi the value of the Breit correction is $-0.9\%$. Thus, the radiative correction compensates the great part of the Breit correction in Cs, and practically exactly compensates it in Tl, Pb, and Bi. With account of both corrections, the difference between the Standard model prediction and the experimental result in Cs, see Ref. [@Cs], stays at the level of $2.2\sigma$.

Concluding we would like to say that both the radiative and the Breit corrections presently are known with high accuracy and this accuracy can be even further improved. The present limitation of the accuracy in the atomic calculations comes from many-body effects with pure Coulomb electron-electron interaction considered in Refs. [@Dzuba2; @Blundell]. An improvement of the accuracy of these calculations is a feasible but a very challenging problem.

A.I.M. would like to thank M. G. Kozlov for helpful discussions, and the School of Physics at the University of New South Wales for warm hospitality and financial support (Gordon Godfrey fund) during a visit. O.P.S. gratefully acknowledges discussions and correspondence with W. R. Johnson and A. S. Yelkhovsky.

L. M. Barkov and M. S. Zolotorev, JETP Lett., [**27**]{}, 357 (1978); M. J. D. MacPherson [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**67**]{}, 2784 (1991). D. M. Meekhof [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**71**]{}, 3442 (1993). N. H. Edwards [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**74**]{}, 2654 (1995); P. A. Vetter [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**74**]{}, 2658 (1995). C. S. Wood [*et al.*]{}, Science [**275**]{}, 1759 (1997); S. C. Bennett and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**82**]{}, 2484 (1999). D. E. Groom [*et al*]{} Euro.
is $ +0.4\%$ for Cs and $ +0.9\%$ for Tl, Pb and Bi. The value of the Breit correction in Cs is $ -0.6\%$, see Refs. [ @Der; @Dzuba3 ]. The Breit correction scales much linearly with Z, see Ref.[@Sushkov ]. consequently, for Tl, Pb, and Bi the value of the Breit discipline is $ -0.9\%$. Thus, the radiative correction compensates the capital part of the Breit correction in Cs, and much exactly compensates it in Tl, Pb, and Bi. With account of both correction, the difference between the Standard model prediction and the experimental resultant role in Cs, see Ref. [ @Cs ], stays at the horizontal surface of $ 2.2\sigma$. 

 Concluding we would like to suppose that both the radiative and the Breit corrections presently are know with high accuracy and this accuracy can be even further improved. The present limit of the accuracy in the atomic calculations comes from many - body consequence with pure Coulomb electron - electron interaction considered in Refs. [ @Dzuba2; @Blundell ]. An improvement of the accuracy of these calculations is a feasible but a very challenging problem. 

 A.I.M. would wish to thank M. G. Kozlov for helpful discussions, and the School of Physics at the University of New South Wales for warm hospitality and financial support (Gordon Godfrey fund) during a sojourn. O.P.S. appreciatively acknowledges discussions and correspondence with W. R. Johnson and A. S. Yelkhovsky. 

 L. M. Barkov and M. S. Zolotorev, JETP Lett. , [ * * 27 * * ] { }, 357 (1978); M. J. D. MacPherson [ * et al. * ] { }, Phys. Rev. Lett. , [ * * 67 * * ] { }, 2784 (1991). D. M. Meekhof [ * et al. * ] { }, Phys. Rev. Lett. , [ * * 71 * * ] { }, 3442 (1993). N. H. Edwards [ * et al. * ] { }, Phys. Rev. Lett. , [ * * 74 * * ] { }, 2654 (1995); P. A. Vetter [ * et al. * ] { }, Phys. Rev. Lett. , [ * * 74 * * ] { }, 2658 (1995). C. S. Wood [ * et al. * ] { }, Science [ * * 275 * * ] { }, 1759 (1997); S. C. Bennett and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 82 * * ] { }, 2484 (1999). D. E. Groom [ * et al * ] { } Euro.
 is $+0.4\%$ for Cs and $+0.9\%$ for Tl, Pb xnd Bi. The valug if the Breit correctkon in Cs is $-0.6\%$, see Refs. [@Der; @Dvuba3]. The Vreit correction scaler practicwlly linwarlb with Z, see Ref.[@Sushkov]. Bkerefkve, fox Vl, Pb, and Bi thg value of tve Breit correwtkou is $-0.9\%$. Thus, the radiative correction sompensstfs the great pwrt ps ths Breit correction in Cs, and practjcally txactly compensatex it in Tl, Pb, and Bi. With wccoknt of both correchions, the duffewwnce between the Standard model prgdiction and the experimental rerult nn Cs, see Rgy. [@Cs], vtays at thx levej of $2.2\sigma$.

Cokbluding we woukd like to say thet bith the radiative and the Breit correctyons presancly are known with hith accutacy dnd gyis acducacg can he xven furthed improved. Rhe present limitatoog of the accurzcy in tre atomic calculations comes from many-bmdy effects with pure Coulimb electron-electron lnteractijn considered in Refs. [@Dzuba2; @Blundell]. An improvemett of ghe agcurxxy of these calculations is a feasible but a vewg vhsllenging probjem.

A.I.M. woulc pilg to thank M. G. Kozlor fkr helpful discusslons, anq the School os Phusics at the University of Bew South Wajws for warm hospitclity and fiuanciak suplort (Gordon Godfrey funb) durihg a visit. L.P.S. graterjlly acknowledger dpscuvsions and correspondence rith W. R. Oohnspn and X. S. Ielkhovfky.

L. M. Barnov akg M. S. Zolotorev, JEHP Lejt., [**27**]{}, 357 (1978); K. J. D. MacPjerson [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**67**]{}, 2784 (1991). D. M. Meekhof [*et sl.*]{}, Phjs. Rev. Lect., [**71**]{}, 3442 (1993). K. H. Edwards [*et wl.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lejt., [**74**]{}, 2654 (1995); P. A. Vettdr [*et al.*]{}, Pgys. Rev. Lett., [**74**]{}, 2658 (1995). C. F. Wood [*et al.*]{}, Vfience [**275**]{}, 1759 (1997); S. R. Bennett and C. E. Wieman, Ohys. Rev. Lett. [**82**]{}, 2484 (1999). D. E. Groom [*et al*]{} Wuro.
is $+0.4\%$ for Cs and $+0.9\%$ for and The value the Breit correction Refs. @Dzuba3]. The Breit scales practically linearly Z, see Ref.[@Sushkov]. Therefore, for Tl, and Bi the value of the Breit correction is $-0.9\%$. Thus, the radiative compensates the great part of the Breit correction in Cs, and practically exactly it Tl, and With account of both corrections, the difference between the Standard model prediction and the experimental result Cs, see Ref. [@Cs], stays at the level $2.2\sigma$. Concluding we would to say that both the and Breit corrections are with accuracy and this can be even further improved. The present limitation of the accuracy in the atomic calculations comes from effects with electron-electron interaction in [@Dzuba2; An improvement of of these calculations is a feasible challenging problem. A.I.M. would like to thank M. Kozlov for discussions, and the School of Physics the University of New South Wales for warm and financial support (Gordon Godfrey fund) during a visit. O.P.S. gratefully acknowledges discussions and correspondence R. Johnson and A. Yelkhovsky. L. M. and S. JETP [**27**]{}, 357 M. J. D. MacPherson [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**67**]{}, 2784 D. M. Meekhof [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**71**]{}, 3442 H. [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Lett., [**74**]{}, 2654 (1995); A. [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. 2658 C. al.*]{}, [**275**]{}, (1997); S. C. Bennett C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. [**82**]{}, 2484 (1999). D.
 is $+0.4\%$ for Cs and $+0.9\%$ for Tl, Pb and Bi. The Value of the breit CorRecTiOn in cs is $-0.6\%$, See Refs. [@Der; @DzubA3]. the BReit correction scales prActicAlLY linEArLy witH Z, see ReF.[@suSHKov]. thErEfoRe, FOr tl, Pb, aNd BI the valUe of the BreIt cOrRection is $-0.9\%$. ThuS, ThE radiative CorRection compeNsaTes the GrEat PArt of The breit CorrecTIon in CS, and practIcALly exaCTly compENSaTes iT in Tl, Pb, and Bi. With aCCoUNt of both correcTions, tHe DIfFERenCe bEtween the STaNdard MOdel preDIcTION anD The experimentAl result in CS, See ref. [@Cs], sTaYs aT The levEl of $2.2\sIgMA$.

CoNcluding we wOuld Like to say That boTH the radIAtive anD the BrEit CorRectIOnS pResEnTLy aRE kNowN WitH high accUrAcY and tHis aCCURAcy cAn bE eveN furtHer improved. ThE prEsenT LimItatiOn of tHe acCuRacy iN the atOmic cAlCulations comes fRom mAny-body efFecTs WitH pUre CoULomb elEctRon-ElectroN interaCTioN cONSIdEred in Refs. [@Dzuba2; @BluNdELL]. AN improveMent of THe AcCUracy of tHeSe cAlcuLATions Is a fEAsIble but a Very chALlEnGing proBlEm.

A.I.M. wOuLd lIke To thaNK M. G. KOzlov fOr helpfuL discUSsions, and the ScHOol of Physics aT ThE uNiVErsiTy oF New South WaLes fOR warM hosPItAliTY and fInancIaL SuPPort (Gordon Godfrey fuNd) During A visiT. O.P.S. gratefullY acknowledGES DiscussiOns aND cORrespondence wiTh W. R. JOhnson and A. s. yelkhovsKy.

L. M. BArkov and m. S. ZolotorEV, jETP Lett., [**27**]{}, 357 (1978); m. J. D. macpheRsoN [*ET aL.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**67**]{}, 2784 (1991). D. m. mEekhOf [*Et al.*]{}, PhyS. ReV. Lett., [**71**]{}, 3442 (1993). N. H. edwArdS [*et Al.*]{}, PHyS. Rev. Lett., [**74**]{}, 2654 (1995); P. a. Vetter [*eT aL.*]{}, PHyS. REv. LEtt., [**74**]{}, 2658 (1995). C. S. wOod [*et al.*]{}, SCiEncE [**275**]{}, 1759 (1997); S. c. BeNnett ANd C. E. WiEman, PHys. REv. leTT. [**82**]{}, 2484 (1999). D. E. groom [*et AL*]{} EURO.
 is $+0.4\%$ for Cs and $+ 0.9\%$ for  Tl,Pband  B i. T he v alue of the Br e it c orrection in Cs is $-0 .6\%$ ,s ee R e fs . [@D er; @Dz u ba 3 ] . T he  B rei tc or recti onscalespracticall y l in early with Z ,  s ee Ref.[@S ush kov]. Theref ore , forTl , P b , and  Bi  thevalueo f theBreit cor re c tion i s  $-0.9\ % $ .Thus , the radiative c o rr e ction compensa tes th eg re a t  pa rtof the Bre it  corr e ction i n  C s , and practically e xactly comp e nsa tes it  i n T l , Pb,and B i. Wit h account o f bo th correc tions, the dif f erencebetwee n t heStan d ar dmod el pre d ic tio n  an d the ex pe ri menta l re s u l t  inCs,  see  Ref.  [@Cs], stays  at  the lev el of  $2.2 \sig ma $.

C onclud ing w ewould like to s ay t hat boththe  r adi at ive a n d theBre itcorrect ions pr e sen tl y a re  known with high a cc u r ac y and th is acc u ra cy can be e ve n f urth e r  impr oved .  T he prese nt lim i ta ti on of t he  accur ac y i n t he at o miccalcul ations c omesf rom many-bodye ffects with p u re C ou l ombele ctron-elect roni nter acti o ncon s idere d inRe f s. [@Dzuba2; @Blundell ].  An im prove ment of the a ccuracy of t h ese calc ulat i on s  is a feasible  buta very cha l lengingprobl em.

A.I .M. would l ike to t han k M . G . K o z lo v for helpful d iscu ss ions, a ndthe Sch ool  of  Ph ysi cs  at the U niversit yof  N ew  So uth W a les forwa rmho spi talit y  and f inanc ialsu pp o rt(Gordon Go d f reyfu nd ) du rin ga vis it.O .P. S. grat efully ac kno w ledg es  d iscussi ons and corre sp ondence wi th  W.  R. Jo h n son andA. S. Yelkhovsky.

L. M .  Barkov  an d M.S. Z olotorev,  JE TP Let t., [**27* *]{},357 ( 19 78) ; M. J. D .Mac Ph erson [*et a l.* ]{},Ph ys.Rev. Le tt., [**67**]{}, 2 7 84(1991). D. M.  Me ekho f [* eta l. * ]{} ,P hys . Rev. Lett., [** 71**]{}, 3 44 2  ( 1993). N.H . E dw ards [* et al.* ]{},P hys. Re v. Lett.,  [**74**] {} , 26 5 4  (1 995); P. A . Vetter  [*et al. * ]{},P hy s. Re v.Lett.,  [ **7 4**]{ }, 265 8  (1 995).  C. S.  W ood [* et al .* ]{}, Sci ence [**275**]{}, 1759(1997) ; S.C.Bennett a ndC . E . Wieman,  Phy s. Rev. Le tt.  [* *82** ]{} ,  2484  (19 9 9) . D .  E. G room [*et al*] { }Eur o . 
 is_$+0.4\%$ for_Cs and $+0.9\%$ for_Tl, Pb_and_Bi. The_value_of the Breit_correction in Cs_is $-0.6\%$, see Refs._[@Der; @Dzuba3]. The_Breit_correction scales practically linearly with Z, see Ref.[@Sushkov]. Therefore, for Tl, Pb, and Bi_the_value of_the_Breit_correction is $-0.9\%$. Thus, the_radiative correction compensates the great_part of_the Breit correction in Cs, and practically exactly_compensates_it in Tl,_Pb, and Bi. With account of both corrections, the_difference between the Standard model prediction_and the experimental_result_in_Cs, see Ref. [@Cs],_stays at the level of $2.2\sigma$.

Concluding_we would like to say that_both the radiative and the Breit corrections_presently are known with high accuracy_and this accuracy can be_even further_improved. The present limitation of_the accuracy in_the atomic_calculations comes from_many-body effects with pure Coulomb electron-electron_interaction considered in_Refs. [@Dzuba2; @Blundell]. An improvement of_the_accuracy of these_calculations_is_a feasible_but a very_challenging_problem.

A.I.M. would_like_to thank M. G. Kozlov for_helpful_discussions, and the School of Physics at_the University of New_South_Wales for warm hospitality_and financial support (Gordon Godfrey_fund) during a visit. O.P.S. gratefully_acknowledges discussions_and correspondence_with W. R. Johnson and A. S. Yelkhovsky.

L. M. Barkov and_M. S. Zolotorev, JETP Lett., [**27**]{},_357 (1978); M. J._D. MacPherson_[*et_al.*]{}, Phys. Rev._Lett.,_[**67**]{}, 2784_(1991). D. M. Meekhof [*et al.*]{}, Phys._Rev. Lett.,_[**71**]{}, 3442 (1993). N. H. Edwards_[*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev._Lett.,_[**74**]{}, 2654 (1995); P. A. Vetter_[*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett., [**74**]{},_2658 (1995). C. S. Wood_[*et_al.*]{},_Science [**275**]{}, 1759 (1997); S._C. Bennett and C. E. Wieman,_Phys. Rev. Lett._[**82**]{}, 2484 (1999). D. E. Groom [*et_al*]{}_Euro.