 found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_b "fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography (SM) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams for each of the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories: (a) A, almost entirely fatty, (b) B, scattered areas of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely dense. Images are normalized so that the grayscale intensity windows found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_c "fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography (SM) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams for each of the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories: (a) A, almost entirely fatty, (b) B, scattered areas of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely dense. Images are normalized so that the grayscale intensity windows found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_d_6 "fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

Deep learning (DL) has previously been employed to assess BI-RADS breast density for film [@yi_deep-learning_2018] and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images [@gandomkar_bi-rads_2019; @mohamed_deep_2018; @ma_multi-path_2019; @lehman_mammographic_2019; @wu_breast_2017] with some models demonstrating closer agreement with consensus estimates than individual radiologists [@lehman_mammographic_2019]. To realize the promise of using these DL models in clinical practice, two key challenges must be met. First, as breast cancer screening is increasingly moving to digital breast tom
found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data - label="fig: example_density_cview"}](example_birads_b " fig:"){width="\textwidth " } 

 [ 0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography (samarium) image derived from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examination for each of the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI - RADS) breast density category: (a) A, almost wholly fatty, (b) bel, scattered area of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) five hundred, extremely dense. Images are normalize so that the grayscale volume windows found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data - label="fig: example_density_cview"}](example_birads_c " fig:"){width="\textwidth " } 

 [ 0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography (samarium) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams for each of the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI - RADS) breast concentration categories: (a) A, about entirely fatty, (b) bacillus, scattered areas of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, highly dense. Images are normalized so that the grayscale intensity windows found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers rate from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{data - label="fig: example_density_cview"}](example_birads_d_6 " fig:"){width="\textwidth " } 

 Deep learning (DL) has previously been employed to assess BI - RADS breast density for film [ @yi_deep - learning_2018 ] and full - field digital mammography (FFDM) images [ @gandomkar_bi - rads_2019; @mohamed_deep_2018; @ma_multi - path_2019; @lehman_mammographic_2019; @wu_breast_2017 ] with some models demonstrating close agreement with consensus estimates than individual radiologists [ @lehman_mammographic_2019 ]. To gain the promise of using these DL models in clinical practice, two key challenge must be meet. First, as breast cancer screening is increasingly move to digital breast tom
 foknd in their Digital Imaning and Communieqtions in Mesicine (DKCOM) headers range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{vata-oabel="dig:example_density_cview"}](dxample_bigads_b "fig:"){qidti="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Examplx synthebnc 2D jwmmoyrephy (SM) images cerived frmm digital bredsg comosynthesis (DBT) exams for each of ehe fout Hreast Imaging Reppwtinf and Data System (BI-RADS) breast dehsity cetegories: (a) A, akmost entirely fatty, (b) B, sfattfred areas of fibrlglandular eensyry, (c) C, heterugeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely dense. Images are nurmalnzed so thaj fhf grayscale mntenspty windows found in dheir Dogital Imaging anv Conmunications in Medicmne (DICOM) headers ragge from 0.0 tk 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:exanpoe_denvity_wvied"}](wxaoplt_bicada_c "fig:"){aidvh="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Sxample synrhetic 2D mammographu (FN) images deribed frjm digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams fod each of the four Breawt Imaging Reporting wnd Data Fystem (BI-RADS) breast density categories: (a) A, almosd entmrdly fwgry, (b) B, scattered areas of fibroglandular densitr, (c) C, heterogeneousjy dense, anc (f) C, extremely devse. Imcfea are normalized sl that jhe grqyscale igtenxity windows found in their Digital Imayint and Communicatious in Mediciue (DICPM) hesders range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{daca-labem="fig:example_fensity_cvjdw"}](example_birads_d_6 "fin:"){wigth="\textwidth"}

Deep learning (QL) has prxviouxly beev emkloyed eo assess HI-RADS breast density fog fill [@fi_deep-learjing_2018] and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) ikaces [@gandomkcr_bi-racs_2019; @mohamed_dee[_2018; @ma_multi-path_2019; @kehman_mcmmogrxphic_2019; @wu_brvast_2017] with some modelf demonstratith closer agrxement wieh cinsebsus esgkmates than incividual gabiologistw [@lehman_mammographlc_2019]. To dealize the pronist if using these DL moqeps ig clinical prdctize, geo keh challtugew musy be met. First, as braast cancer screening os increasungly moding to digitsl breast tom
found in their Digital Imaging and Communications (DICOM) range from to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_b "fig:"){width="\textwidth"} images from digital breast (DBT) exams for of the four Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories: (a) A, almost entirely fatty, (b) B, areas of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely dense. are so the intensity windows found in their Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from 0.0 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_c "fig:"){width="\textwidth"} [0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography (SM) images from digital breast tomosynthesis exams for each of the Breast Reporting and System breast categories: (a) A, entirely fatty, (b) B, scattered areas of fibroglandular density, (c) C, heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely Images are that the intensity found their Digital Imaging in Medicine (DICOM) headers range from "fig:"){width="\textwidth"} Deep learning (DL) has previously been employed assess BI-RADS density for film [@yi_deep-learning_2018] and full-field mammography (FFDM) images [@gandomkar_bi-rads_2019; @mohamed_deep_2018; @ma_multi-path_2019; @lehman_mammographic_2019; @wu_breast_2017] some models demonstrating closer agreement with consensus estimates than individual radiologists [@lehman_mammographic_2019]. To realize the using these DL models clinical practice, two challenges be First, breast cancer is increasingly moving to digital breast tom
 found in their Digital ImaginG and CommunIcatiOns In MEdIcinE (DICoM) headers range FRom 0.0 tO 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_deNsity_CvIEw"}](exAMpLe_birAds_b "fig:"){WIdTH="\TexTwIdTh"}

[0.25]{}![EXaMPlE syntHetIc 2D mammOgraphy (SM) iMagEs Derived from dIGiTal breast tOmoSynthesis (DBT) ExaMs for eAcH of THe fouR BrEast IMaging rEportiNg and Data sySTem (BI-RadS) breasT DEnSity Categories: (a) A, almosT EnTIrely fatty, (b) B, scAttereD aREaS OF fiBroGlandular dEnSity, (c) c, HeterogENeOUSLy dENse, and (d) D, extreMely dense. ImAGes Are norMaLizED so thaT the gRaYScaLe intensity WindOws found iN their dIgital IMAging anD CommuNicAtiOns iN meDiCinE (DicOM) HEaDerS RanGe from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{DaTa-Label="Fig:eXAMPLe_deNsiTy_cvIew"}](exAmple_birads_c "fIg:"){wIdth="\TExtWidth"}

[0.25]{}![exampLe syNtHetic 2d mammoGraphY (Sm) images derived fRom dIgital breAst ToMosYnThesiS (dBT) exaMs fOr eAch of thE four BrEAst imAGINg reporting and Data SyStEM (bI-rADS) breaSt densITy CaTEgories: (a) a, aLmoSt enTIRely fAtty, (B) b, sCattered Areas oF FiBrOglanduLaR densiTy, (C) C, hEteRogenEOuslY dense, And (d) D, extRemelY Dense. Images are NOrmalized so thAT tHE GrAYscaLe iNtensity winDows FOund In thEIr digITal ImAging AnD coMMunications in MediciNe (dICOM) hEaderS range from 0.0 to 1.0.[]{dAta-label="fiG:EXAmple_denSity_CViEW"}](example_birads_D_6 "fig:"){wIdth="\textwiDTh"}

Deep leArninG (DL) has prEviously bEEN employeD to AssEss bI-Rads bReast density fOR Film [@Yi_Deep-leaRniNg_2018] and fuLl-fIelD diGitAl MammograpHy (FFDM) imAgEs [@GaNdOmkAr_bi-rADs_2019; @mohameD_dEep_2018; @Ma_MulTi-patH_2019; @Lehman_MammoGrapHiC_2019; @wU_BreAst_2017] with SOmE MOdelS dEmOnstRatInG closEr agREemEnt with Consensus EstIMateS tHaN indiviDual radiologiStS [@lehman_mamMoGraPhic_2019]. To REAlize the Promise of using these DL moDEls in clIniCal prActiCe, two key cHalLenges MusT Be met. FIrst, as BreasT cAncER ScreeNINg Is iNcReasingly mOVIng To digItAl brEast tom
 found in their Digital Im aging andCommu nic ati on s in  Med icine (DICOM)h eade rs range from 0.0 to 1 .0.[] {d a ta-l a be l="fi g:examp l e_ d e nsi ty _c vie w" } ]( examp le_ birads_ b "fig:"){ wid th ="\textwidth " }
[0.25]{}! [Ex ample synthe tic  2D ma mm ogr a phy ( SM)  imag es der i ved fr om digita lb reastt omosynt h e si s (D BT) exams for eac h  o f  the four Brea st Ima gi n gR e por tin g and Data  S ystem (BI-RAD S )b r e ast density categ ories: (a)A , a lmosten tir e ly fat ty, ( b) B,scattered a reas  of fibro glandu l ar dens i ty, (c)  C, he ter oge neou s ly  d ens e, and (d ) D ,  ex tremelyde ns e. Im ages a r e  nor mal ized  so t hat the grays cal e in t ens ity w indow s fo un d intheirDigit al  Imaging and Co mmun icationsinMe dic in e (DI C OM) he ade rsrange f rom 0.0 to1. 0 . [ ]{ data-label="fig:ex am p l e_ density_ cview" } ]( ex a mple_bir ad s_c  "fi g : "){wi dth= " \t extwidth "}

[0 . 25 ]{ }![Exam pl e synt he tic  2D  mamm o grap hy (SM ) images  deri v ed from digita l  breast tomos y nt h e si s  (DB T)exams for e acho f th e fo u rBre a st Im aging  R e po r ting and Data Syste m(BI-RA DS) b reast density  categorie s : (a) A, a lmos t  e n tirely fatty,(b) B , scattere d  areas o f fib roglandu lar densi t y , (c) C,  he ter oge neo u s ly  dense, and ( d )  D,ex tremely  de nse. Im age s a renor ma lized sothat the  g ra ys ca leinten s ity wind ow s f ou ndin th e ir Dig italImag in ga ndCommuni c at i o ns i nMe dici ne(D ICOM)  hea d ers  rangefrom 0.0to1 .0.[ ]{ da ta-labe l="fig:exampl e_ density_cv ie w"} ](exam p l e_birads _d_6 "fig:"){width="\te x twidth" }
Deeplear ning (DL)  ha s prev iou s ly bee n empl oyedto  as s e ss BI - R AD S b re ast densit y for  film  [ @yi_ deep-le arning_2018] and f u ll- field digital  ma mmog r a ph y ( F FD M ) i ma g es[ @ gandomkar_bi-ra ds_2019; @ mo h am ed_deep_20 1 8;@m a_multi -path_2 019;@ lehman_ mammograp hic_2019;  @ wu_b r e ast _2017] wit h some m odels dem o nstra t in g clo ser  agree me ntwithconsen s usestim ates t ha n indi vidua lradiolog ists [@lehman_mammograp hic_20 19].Torealize t hep rom ise of us ingthese DL m ode lsin cl ini c al pr acti c e,  tw o  keychal l enges mus t  b e m e t .First, as b r e a stcance r s c reenin g is  increasingly mov i ng to digitalbrea s t  to m
 found_in their_Digital Imaging and Communications_in Medicine_(DICOM)_headers range_from_0.0 to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_b_"fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D_mammography (SM) images derived_from digital breast_tomosynthesis_(DBT) exams for each of the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)_breast_density categories:_(a)_A,_almost entirely fatty, (b) B,_scattered areas of fibroglandular density,_(c) C,_heterogeneously dense, and (d) D, extremely dense. Images_are_normalized so that_the grayscale intensity windows found in their Digital Imaging_and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers_range from 0.0_to_1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_c_"fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

[0.25]{}![Example synthetic 2D mammography_(SM) images derived from digital breast_tomosynthesis (DBT) exams for each of_the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data_System (BI-RADS) breast density categories: (a)_A, almost entirely fatty, (b)_B, scattered_areas of fibroglandular density, (c)_C, heterogeneously dense,_and (d)_D, extremely dense._Images are normalized so that the_grayscale intensity windows_found in their Digital Imaging and_Communications_in Medicine (DICOM)_headers_range_from 0.0_to 1.0.[]{data-label="fig:example_density_cview"}](example_birads_d_6 "fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

Deep_learning_(DL) has_previously_been employed to assess BI-RADS breast_density_for film [@yi_deep-learning_2018] and full-field digital mammography_(FFDM) images [@gandomkar_bi-rads_2019; @mohamed_deep_2018;_@ma_multi-path_2019;_@lehman_mammographic_2019; @wu_breast_2017] with some_models demonstrating closer agreement with_consensus estimates than individual radiologists [@lehman_mammographic_2019]._To realize_the promise_of using these DL models in clinical practice, two key challenges_must be met. First, as breast_cancer screening is increasingly_moving to_digital_breast tom