}{2}\right)
V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ that help us to eliminate some multiplicative operators and the time derivative when we inverse the Fourier transform. Furthermore, by applying the Green theorem and calculating on computer terms of the form ${u}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){u}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$, ${v}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){v}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$,..., etc., we find two [*identical*]{} reps. whose basis generators read, ${\tilde P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tilde P_i=p_i$ and $$\begin{aligned}
{\tilde H}^{(\pm)}&=&\omega {\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \omega \left (p_i \partial_{p_i}+\frac{3}{2}\right)\label{Hamp}\\
{\tilde J_i}^{(\pm)}&=& \frac{1}{2}\,\varepsilon_{ijk}
{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(jk)}=-i\varepsilon_{ijk}p_j\partial_{p_k}+\frac{1}{2}\sigma_i\\
{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(0i)}= i {\tilde H}^{(\pm)}\partial_{p_i}+\frac{\omega}{2}p_i\Delta_p - p_i \frac{\vec{p}^2+m^2}{2\omega \vec{p}^2}\nonumber\\
&&~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{ijk}\left(i\omega \partial_{p_j}- p_j\frac{m}{2\vec{p}^2}\right)\sigma_k\\
{\tilde R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i-\frac{1}{\omega}\tilde P_i\,,\label{Rip}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta_p=\partial_{p_i}\partial_{p_i}$. These basis generators satisfy the specific $sp(2,2)$ commutation rules of the form (\[ALG1\])-(\[HHKR\]). Moreover, it is not difficult to verify that these are Hermitian operators with respect to the scalar products of the momentum rep. $$\
} { 2}\right) 
 V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ that help us to eliminate some multiplicative operators and the time derived function when we inverse the Fourier transform. Furthermore, by enforce the Green theorem and calculating on calculator terms of the shape $ { u}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){u}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$, $ { v}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){v}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$, ..., etc. , we find two [ * identical * ] { } rep. whose footing generators read, $ { \tilde P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tilde P_i = p_i$ and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \tilde H}^{(\pm)}&=&\omega { \tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \omega \left (p_i \partial_{p_i}+\frac{3}{2}\right)\label{Hamp}\\ 
 { \tilde J_i}^{(\pm)}&= & \frac{1}{2}\,\varepsilon_{ijk } 
 { \tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(jk)}=-i\varepsilon_{ijk}p_j\partial_{p_k}+\frac{1}{2}\sigma_i\\ 
 { \tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(0i)}= i { \tilde H}^{(\pm)}\partial_{p_i}+\frac{\omega}{2}p_i\Delta_p - p_i \frac{\vec{p}^2+m^2}{2\omega \vec{p}^2}\nonumber\\ 
 & & ~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{ijk}\left(i\omega \partial_{p_j}- p_j\frac{m}{2\vec{p}^2}\right)\sigma_k\\ 
 { \tilde R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i-\frac{1}{\omega}\tilde P_i\,,\label{Rip}\end{aligned}$$ where $ \Delta_p=\partial_{p_i}\partial_{p_i}$. These basis generators satisfy the specific $ sp(2,2)$ substitution rules of the form (\[ALG1\])-(\[HHKR\ ]). Moreover, it is not difficult to control that these are Hermitian operators with respect to the scalar products of the momentum rep. $ $ \
}{2}\rigjt)
V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumbev\end{aligned}$$ that help uv to emiminate some multiplicative operatocs abd tht time derivative wfen we innerse the Foucier transform. Fndthermovz, by ziplyiug the Green theprem and cdlculating on woopbter terms of the form ${u}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{[}_i){u}_{\vec{p},\xihma}(t)$, ${v}^+_{\vec{p},\sigmw}(t)F(t,{k}_i){v}_{\dec{p},\apgna}(t)$,..., etc., we find two [*identical*]{} reps. wiose basis genetators read, ${\tilde P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tildf P_i=o_i$ and $$\begin{alignef}
{\tilde H}^{(\pm)}&=&\onega {\rilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \ooega \left (k_i \partial_{p_i}+\rrac{3}{2}\right)\label{Hamp}\\
{\tilde J_i}^{(\pm)}&=& \frxc{1}{2}\,\varzpsilon_{ijk}
{\tulee D}^{(\km)}_{(jk)}=-i\varepsioon_{ijh}p_j\partial_{p_k}+\ngac{1}{2}\sigmd_i\\
{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(0l)}= i {\tmlde H}^{(\pm)}\partial_{p_i}+\frac{\omege}{2}p_i\Delta_p - p_i \frac{\ves{p}^2+m^2}{2\omega \eee{p}^2}\nonumber\\
&&~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\varepsioob_{ijk}\lgft(i\okega \pargiam_{p_o}- p_n\frac{m}{2\gec{'}^2}\right)\sigma_i\\
{\tilde R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\rilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_o-\fwqc{1}{\omega}\tilde L_i\,,\labej{Ryp}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta_p=\partial_{p_i}\partidl_{p_j}$. These basis generatorw satisfy the specifif $sp(2,2)$ commttation rules of the form (\[ALG1\])-(\[HHKR\]). Moreover, it is tot dmfwicbot to cegify that these are Hermitian operators with wsskecn to the scalar pvoducts of the momrnhuk rep. $$\
}{2}\right) V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ that help us to eliminate operators the time when we inverse applying Green theorem and on computer terms the form ${u}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){u}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$, ${v}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){v}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$,..., etc., we two [*identical*]{} reps. whose basis generators read, ${\tilde P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tilde P_i=p_i$ and $$\begin{aligned} {\tilde {\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \omega \left (p_i \partial_{p_i}+\frac{3}{2}\right)\label{Hamp}\\ {\tilde J_i}^{(\pm)}&=& \frac{1}{2}\,\varepsilon_{ijk} {\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(jk)}=-i\varepsilon_{ijk}p_j\partial_{p_k}+\frac{1}{2}\sigma_i\\ {\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde i H}^{(\pm)}\partial_{p_i}+\frac{\omega}{2}p_i\Delta_p p_i \vec{p}^2}\nonumber\\ &&~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{ijk}\left(i\omega \partial_{p_j}- p_j\frac{m}{2\vec{p}^2}\right)\sigma_k\\ {\tilde R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i-\frac{1}{\omega}\tilde P_i\,,\label{Rip}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta_p=\partial_{p_i}\partial_{p_i}$. These basis generators satisfy the $sp(2,2)$ commutation rules of the form (\[ALG1\])-(\[HHKR\]). Moreover, is not difficult to that these are Hermitian operators respect the scalar of momentum $$\
}{2}\right)
V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumBer\end{aligNed}$$ thAt hElp Us To elIminAte some multiplICatiVe operators and the time dErivaTiVE wheN We InverSe the FoURiER TraNsFoRm. FUrTHeRmore, By aPplying The Green thEorEm And calculatiNG oN computer tErmS of the form ${u}^+_{\vEc{p},\Sigma}(t)f(t,{P}_i){u}_{\VEc{p},\siGma}(T)$, ${v}^+_{\vec{P},\sigma}(T)f(t,{p}_i){v}_{\vEc{p},\sigma}(t)$,..., EtC., We find TWo [*identICAl*]{} Reps. Whose basis generatORs REad, ${\tilde P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tiLde P_i=p_I$ aND $$\bEGIn{aLigNed}
{\tilde H}^{(\pM)}&=&\oMega {\tILde X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \OMeGA \LEft (P_I \partial_{p_i}+\fraC{3}{2}\right)\label{hAmp}\\
{\Tilde J_I}^{(\pM)}&=& \frAC{1}{2}\,\varepSilon_{IjK}
{\TilDe X}^{(\pm)}_{(jk)}=-i\varEpsiLon_{ijk}p_j\pArtial_{P_K}+\frac{1}{2}\siGMa_i\\
{\tildE K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tIldE X}^{(\pM)}_{(0i)}= i {\tILdE H}^{(\Pm)}\pArTIal_{P_I}+\fRac{\OMegA}{2}p_i\Delta_P - p_I \fRac{\veC{p}^2+m^2}{2\oMEGA \Vec{p}^2}\NonUmbeR\\
&&~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\Varepsilon_{ijk}\LefT(i\omEGa \pArtiaL_{p_j}- p_j\Frac{M}{2\vEc{p}^2}\riGht)\sigMa_k\\
{\tiLdE R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tIlde k}^{(\pm)}_i-\frac{1}{\oMegA}\tIldE P_I\,,\labeL{rip}\end{AliGneD}$$ where $\DElta_p=\paRTiaL_{p_I}\PARtIal_{p_i}$. These basis genErATOrS satisfy The speCIfIc $SP(2,2)$ commutaTiOn rUles OF The foRm (\[ALg1\])-(\[hHkR\]). MoreovEr, it is NOt DiFficult To Verify ThAt tHesE are HERmitIan opeRators wiTh resPEct to the scalar PRoducts of the mOMeNTUm REp. $$\
}{2}\right)
V_{\vec{p},\si gma}(t,\ve c{x}) \,, \no nu mber \end {aligned}$$ th a t he lp us to eliminate som e mul ti p lica t iv e ope ratorsa nd t heti me  de ri v at ive w hen  we inv erse the F our ie r transform. Fu rthermore,  by  applying th e G reen t he ore m  andcal culat ing on comput er termsof the fo r m ${u}^ + _ {\ vec{ p},\sigma}(t)F(t, { p} _ i){u}_{\vec{p} ,\sigm a} ( t) $ ,  ${ v}^ +_{\vec{p} ,\ sigma } (t)F(t, { p} _ i ) {v} _ {\vec{p},\sig ma}(t)$,... ,  et c., we  f ind two [* ident ic a l*] {} reps. wh osebasis gen erator s  read,$ {\tilde  P}^{( \pm )}_ i=\t i ld eP_i =p _ i$a nd  $$ \ beg in{align ed }{\til de H } ^ { ( \pm) }&= &\om ega { \tilde X}^{(\ pm) }_{( 0 4)} =i \o mega\lef t(p_i\parti al_{p _i }+\frac{3}{2}\r ight )\label{H amp }\ \
{ \t ildeJ _i}^{( \pm )}& =& \fra c{1}{2} \ ,\v ar e p s il on_{ijk}
{\tilde X }^ { ( \p m)}_{(jk )}=-i\ v ar ep s ilon_{ij k} p_j \par t i al_{p _k}+ \ fr ac{1}{2} \sigma _ i\ \{\tilde  K }^{(\p m) }_i &=& {\til d e X} ^{(\pm )}_{(0i) }= i{ \tilde H}^{(\p m )}\partial_{p _ i} + \ fr a c{\o meg a}{2}p_i\De lta_ p  - p _i \ f ra c{\ v ec{p} ^2+m^ 2} { 2\ o mega \vec{p}^2}\non um ber\\&&~~~ ~~~~~~~+\frac {1}{2}\var e p s ilon_{ij k}\l e ft ( i\omega \parti al_{p _j}- p_j\f r ac{m}{2\ vec{p }^2}\rig ht)\sigma _ k \\
{\til deR}^ {(\ pm) } _ i& =&{\tilde X}^ { ( \pm) }_ {(i4)}= -{\ tilde K }^{ (\p m)} _i- \f rac{1}{\o mega}\ti ld eP_ i\ ,,\ label { Rip}\end {a lig ne d}$ $ whe r e $\De lta_p =\pa rt ia l _{p _i}\par t ia l _ {p_i }$ .Thes e b as is ge nera t ors  satisf y the spe cif i c $s p( 2, 2)$ com mutation rule sof the for m(\[ ALG1\] ) - (\[HHKR\ ]). Moreover, it is not difficu ltto ve rify  that the seare He rmi t ian op erator s wit hres p e ct to t he  sc al ar product s ofthe m om entu m rep.$$\
}{2}\right)
V_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t,\vec{x})\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ that_help us_to eliminate some multiplicative_operators and_the_time derivative_when_we inverse the_Fourier transform. Furthermore,_by applying the Green_theorem and calculating_on_computer terms of the form ${u}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){u}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$, ${v}^+_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)F(t,{p}_i){v}_{\vec{p},\sigma}(t)$,..., etc., we find two [*identical*]{} reps. whose_basis_generators read,_${\tilde_P}^{(\pm)}_i=\tilde_P_i=p_i$ and $$\begin{aligned}
{\tilde H}^{(\pm)}&=&\omega {\tilde_X}^{(\pm)}_{(04)}=i \omega \left (p_i \partial_{p_i}+\frac{3}{2}\right)\label{Hamp}\\
{\tilde_J_i}^{(\pm)}&=& \frac{1}{2}\,\varepsilon_{ijk}
{\tilde_X}^{(\pm)}_{(jk)}=-i\varepsilon_{ijk}p_j\partial_{p_k}+\frac{1}{2}\sigma_i\\
{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(0i)}= i {\tilde H}^{(\pm)}\partial_{p_i}+\frac{\omega}{2}p_i\Delta_p - p_i_\frac{\vec{p}^2+m^2}{2\omega_\vec{p}^2}\nonumber\\
&&~~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{ijk}\left(i\omega \partial_{p_j}- p_j\frac{m}{2\vec{p}^2}\right)\sigma_k\\
{\tilde_R}^{(\pm)}_i&=&{\tilde X}^{(\pm)}_{(i4)}=-{\tilde K}^{(\pm)}_i-\frac{1}{\omega}\tilde P_i\,,\label{Rip}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta_p=\partial_{p_i}\partial_{p_i}$. These basis generators_satisfy the specific $sp(2,2)$ commutation rules_of the form_(\[ALG1\])-(\[HHKR\])._Moreover,_it is not difficult_to verify that these are Hermitian_operators with respect to the scalar_products of the momentum rep. $$\