=3,m_F=3\rangle$ state. By contrast, the cavity shift for $\sigma^-$ modes is $G^2\times\sum_{F_e,J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,J_e)^2\frac{1}{\omega-\omega(F_e,J_e)}}$. If we assume that we are near-detuned to the $D_2$ ($J=3/2$) line compared with the fine-structure ($\sim$ 15nm in Rubidium), the $D_1$ ($J=1/2$) Clebsch-Gordons do not contribute. If we are additionally at a large detuning compared with the excited-state hyperfine structure ($\sim$ 600MHz in $^{87}$Rb D2 line), the detuning factor $\omega-\omega(F_e,3/2)$ becomes largely independent of $F_e$, and may be written as $\Delta$; what remains is the sum of squares of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, which in this case equal 1/3; this suggests that for optimal Faraday rotation per atom, while minimizing scattering-induced loss, one should choose a detuning which is on the order of, but not larger than, the atomic fine structure. Figure \[SI\_FIG:RbFaraday\] shows the (numerically computed) ratio of the Faraday dispersive shift to the scattering rate near each D-line feature and as well as over a broad range of detunings.

![(Color online) **Ratio of Faraday Rotation to Loss**. The competition between Faraday rotation of an optical field (which breaks time reversal symmetry) and atomic scattering of the field (which induces loss of the photons), for $^{87}$Rb atoms in the ${| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ ground state, is shown as a function of wavelength of the optical field. Away from the $D_1$ and $D_2$ atomic lines (at 795nm and 780nm, respectively), the ratio saturates, as the atomic scattering scales as $\Delta^{-2}$, and for detunings larger than the atomic fine-structure, the Faraday rotation also scales as $\Delta^{-2}$, where $\Delta$ is the approximate detuning to the atomic lines. At smaller detunings, the Faraday rotation grows as
= 3,m_F=3\rangle$ state. By contrast, the cavity shift for $ \sigma^-$ modality is $ G^2\times\sum_{F_e, J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,J_e)^2\frac{1}{\omega-\omega(F_e, J_e)}}$. If we wear that we are near - detuned to the $ D_2 $ ($ J=3/2 $) line compared with the fine - social organization ($ \sim$ 15 nm in Rubidium), the $ D_1 $ ($ J=1/2 $) Clebsch - Gordons do not contribute. If we are additionally at a large detuning compare with the excited - state hyperfine social organization ($ \sim$ 600MHz in $ ^{87}$Rb D2 credit line), the detuning factor $ \omega-\omega(F_e,3/2)$ become largely independent of $ F_e$, and may be written as $ \Delta$; what stay is the kernel of squares of Clebsch - Gordon coefficients, which in this case equal 1/3; this suggests that for optimum Faraday rotation per atom, while minimizing scattering - induced passing, one should choose a detuning which is on the order of, but not larger than, the nuclear fine social organization. Figure \[SI\_FIG: RbFaraday\ ] shows the (numerically computed) ratio of the Faraday dispersive shift to the disperse rate near each D - line feature and as well as over a wide range of detunings. 

! [ (Color online) * * Ratio of Faraday Rotation to Loss * *. The competition between Faraday rotation of an optical field (which breaks time reversal symmetry) and atomic scattering of the battlefield (which induces loss of the photon), for $ ^{87}$Rb atom in the $ { | F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ earth state, is shown as a function of wavelength of the optical field. Away from the $ D_1 $ and $ D_2 $ atomic line (at 795 nm and 780 nm, respectively), the ratio saturates, as the atomic scattering scales as $ \Delta^{-2}$, and for detunings big than the atomic fine - structure, the Faraday rotation also scales as $ \Delta^{-2}$, where $ \Delta$ is the approximate detuning to the nuclear lines. At little detunings, the Faraday rotation grow as
=3,m_F=3\rwngle$ state. By contrast, uhe cavity shift yir $\sigka^-$ modss is $G^2\tkmes\sum_{F_e,J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,J_e)^2\frac{1}{\omega-\oleta(F_e,J_t)}}$. If we assume that we are nvar-detunee to rhe $D_2$ ($J=3/2$) liis compavzd wifm the hine-structure ($\slm$ 15nm in Rutidium), the $D_1$ ($J=1/2$) Cueysch-Gordons do not contribute. If we wre addotlonally at a lwrge qetuhpnn compared with the excited-state hyperfpne structure ($\sim$ 600MHz in $^{87}$Rb D2 line), the detujing factor $\omega-\omega(V_e,3/2)$ becomes oargqoy independevt of $F_e$, and may be wrjtten as $\Delta$; what remains is ghe sbm of squargs ov Clebsch-Gorvon covfficients, whlbh in tvis casr equal 1/3; this xugjestw that for optimal Facaday rotation per ajom, while kiuimizing scattering-ineuxed lmss, mne ryouud dhpoae a dftuiing which js on the oeder of, but not larbew than, the atojic fige structure. Figure \[SI\_FIG:RbFaraday\] shows uhe (nhmerically computed) ratuo of the Faraday diskersive shyft to the scattering rate near each D-line featura and xs ccju ad over a broad range of detunings.

![(Color online) **Dauio of Faraday Robation to Loss**. The clmlgtition betweev Farabzy rotation of an ophical fyeld (qhich brewks yime reversal symmetry) and qtomic scattvrint of the field (whieh induces luss pf thr photons), for $^{87}$Rb atoms nn the ${| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ ground sfxte, is shown as x flncthon of wavelength of the o[tical fixld. Acay from the $D_1$ and $D_2$ atomic pines (at 795nm and 780nm, respeftivepy), the ratio saturates, as the atomic scattecmng scales as $\Daltd^{-2}$, and fox detukings larger thwn the atomic yine-strueture, ghe Faradaj rotatioi also scalef as $\Delta^{-2}$, whate $\Delta$ is tie approxymatw deruning gu the atomic lones. At smaller detynings, the Faraday rojafion grows as
=3,m_F=3\rangle$ state. By contrast, the cavity shift modes $G^2\times\sum_{F_e,J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,J_e)^2\frac{1}{\omega-\omega(F_e,J_e)}}$. If assume that we ($J=3/2$) compared with the ($\sim$ 15nm in the $D_1$ ($J=1/2$) Clebsch-Gordons do not If we are additionally at a large detuning compared with the excited-state hyperfine ($\sim$ 600MHz in $^{87}$Rb D2 line), the detuning factor $\omega-\omega(F_e,3/2)$ becomes largely independent $F_e$, may written $\Delta$; what remains is the sum of squares of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, which in this case equal this suggests that for optimal Faraday rotation per while minimizing scattering-induced loss, should choose a detuning which on order of, not than, atomic fine structure. \[SI\_FIG:RbFaraday\] shows the (numerically computed) ratio of the Faraday dispersive shift to the scattering rate near each feature and as over broad of ![(Color online) **Ratio Rotation to Loss**. The competition between an optical field (which breaks time reversal symmetry) atomic scattering the field (which induces loss of photons), for $^{87}$Rb atoms in the ${| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ state, is shown as a function of wavelength of the optical field. Away from the $D_2$ atomic lines (at and 780nm, respectively), ratio as atomic scales as and for detunings larger than the atomic fine-structure, the Faraday rotation scales as $\Delta^{-2}$, where $\Delta$ is the approximate detuning to lines. smaller detunings, the rotation grows as
=3,m_F=3\rangle$ state. By contrast, thE cavity shiFt for $\SigMa^-$ mOdEs is $g^2\timEs\sum_{F_e,J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,j_E)^2\fraC{1}{\omega-\omega(F_e,J_e)}}$. If we assUme thAt WE are NEaR-detuNed to thE $d_2$ ($J=3/2$) LINe cOmPaRed WiTH tHe finE-stRucture ($\Sim$ 15nm in RubIdiUm), The $D_1$ ($J=1/2$) Clebsch-gOrDons do not cOntRibute. If we arE adDitionAlLy aT A largE deTuninG compaREd with The exciteD-sTAte hypERfine stRUCtUre ($\sIm$ 600MHz in $^{87}$Rb D2 line), the DEtUNing factor $\omegA-\omega(f_e,3/2)$ BEcOMEs lArgEly indepenDeNt of $F_E$, And may bE WrITTEn aS $\delta$; what remaIns is the sum OF sqUares oF CLebSCh-GordOn coeFfICieNts, which in tHis cAse equal 1/3; tHis sugGEsts thaT For optiMal FarAdaY roTatiON pEr AtoM, wHIle MInImiZIng ScatteriNg-InDuced Loss, ONE SHoulD chOose A detuNing which is on The OrdeR Of, bUt not LargeR thaN, tHe atoMic finE struCtUre. Figure \[SI\_FIG:RBFarAday\] shows The (NuMerIcAlly cOMputed) RatIo oF the FarAday disPErsIvE SHIfT to the scattering raTe NEAr Each D-linE featuRE aNd AS well as oVeR a bRoad RANge of DetuNInGs.

![(Color oNline) **RATiO oF FaradaY ROtatioN tO LoSs**. THe comPEtitIon betWeen FaraDay roTAtion of an opticAL field (which brEAkS TImE ReveRsaL symmetry) anD atoMIc scAtteRInG of THe fieLd (whiCh INdUCes loss of the photons), FoR $^{87}$Rb atoMs in tHe ${| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ grOund state, iS SHOwn as a fuNctiON oF Wavelength of thE optiCal field. AwAY from the $d_1$ and $D_2$ Atomic liNes (at 795nm anD 780NM, respectIveLy), tHe rAtiO SAtUrates, as the atOMIc scAtTering sCalEs as $\DelTa^{-2}$, aNd fOr dEtuNiNgs larger Than the aToMiC fInE-stRuctuRE, the FaraDaY roTaTioN also SCales aS $\DeltA^{-2}$, wheRe $\deLTa$ iS the appROxIMAte dEtUnIng tO thE aTomic LineS. at sMaller dEtunings, tHe FARadaY rOtAtion grOws as
=3,m_F=3\rangle$ state. By  contrast,  thecav ity  s hift  for  $\sigma^-$ mo d es i s $G^2\times\sum_{F_e, J_e={ 1/ 2 ,3/2 } }{ CG(2, 2,F_e,1 ; J= 1 / 2,J _e )^ 2\f ra c {1 }{\om ega -\omega (F_e,J_e)} }$.  I f we assumet ha t we are n ear -detuned tothe  $D_2$  ( $J= 3 /2$)lin e com paredw ith th e fine-st ru c ture ( $ \sim$ 1 5 n min R ubidium), the $D_ 1 $( $J=1/2$) Clebs ch-Gor do n sd o  no t c ontribute.  I f wea re addi t io n a l lya t a large det uning compa r edwith t he  ex c ited-s tatehy p erf ine structu re ( $\sim$ 60 0MHz i n  $^{87} $ Rb D2 l ine),the  de tuni n gfa cto r$ \om e ga -\o m ega (F_e,3/2 )$  b ecome s la r g e l y in dep ende nt of  $F_e$, and m aybe w r itt en as  $\De lta$ ;whatremain s isth e sum of square s of  Clebsch- Gor do n c oe ffici e nts, w hic h i n thiscase eq u al1/ 3 ; th is suggests that f or o pt imal Far aday r o ta ti o n per at om , w hile m inimi zing sc attering -induc e dlo ss, one  s houldch oos e a  detu n ingwhichis on th e ord e r of, but notl arger than, t h ea t om i c fi nestructure.Figu r e \[ SI\_ F IG :Rb F arada y\] s ho w st he (numerically com pu ted) r atioof the Farada y dispersi v e shift to  the sc a ttering rate n ear e ach D-line featureand a s well a s over ab r oad rang e o f d etu nin g s .
![(Color onl i n e) * *R atio of  Fa raday R ota tio n t o L os s**. Thecompetit io nbe tw een  Fara d ay rotat io n o fanoptic a l fiel d (wh ichbr ea k s t ime rev e rs a l  sym me tr y) a ndat omicscat t eri ng of t he field(wh i ch i nd uc es loss  of the photo ns ), for $^{ 87 }$R b atom s in the $ {| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ g r ound st ate , isshow n as a fu nct ion of  wa v elengt h of t he op ti cal f ield. A wa y f ro m the $D_1 $ and  $D_2 $atom ic line s (at 795nm and 78 0 nm,  respectively ),ther a ti o s a tu r ate s, ast h e atomic scatte ring scale sa s$\Delta^{- 2 }$,  a nd fordetunin gs la r ger tha n the ato mic fine- st ruct u r e,the Farada y rotati on also s c alesa s$\Del ta^ {-2}$,  w her e $\D elta$i s t he ap proxim at e detu ningto  the ato mic lines. At smaller d etunin gs, t heFaraday r ota t ion  grows as 
=3,m_F=3\rangle$ state._By contrast,_the cavity shift for_$\sigma^-$ modes_is_$G^2\times\sum_{F_e,J_e={1/2,3/2}}{CG(2,2,F_e,1;J=1/2,J_e)^2\frac{1}{\omega-\omega(F_e,J_e)}}$. If_we_assume that we_are near-detuned to_the $D_2$ ($J=3/2$) line_compared with the_fine-structure_($\sim$ 15nm in Rubidium), the $D_1$ ($J=1/2$) Clebsch-Gordons do not contribute. If we are_additionally_at a_large_detuning_compared with the excited-state hyperfine_structure ($\sim$ 600MHz in $^{87}$Rb_D2 line),_the detuning factor $\omega-\omega(F_e,3/2)$ becomes largely independent of_$F_e$,_and may be_written as $\Delta$; what remains is the sum of_squares of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, which in_this case equal_1/3;_this_suggests that for optimal_Faraday rotation per atom, while minimizing_scattering-induced loss, one should choose a_detuning which is on the order of,_but not larger than, the atomic_fine structure. Figure \[SI\_FIG:RbFaraday\] shows_the (numerically_computed) ratio of the Faraday_dispersive shift to_the scattering_rate near each_D-line feature and as well as_over a broad_range of detunings.

![(Color online) **Ratio of_Faraday_Rotation to Loss**._The_competition_between Faraday_rotation of an_optical_field (which_breaks_time reversal symmetry) and atomic scattering_of_the field (which induces loss of the_photons), for $^{87}$Rb atoms_in_the ${| F=2,m_F=2\rangle}$ ground_state, is shown as a_function of wavelength of the optical_field. Away_from the_$D_1$ and $D_2$ atomic lines (at 795nm and 780nm, respectively), the_ratio saturates, as the atomic scattering_scales as $\Delta^{-2}$, and_for detunings_larger_than the atomic_fine-structure,_the Faraday_rotation also scales as $\Delta^{-2}$, where $\Delta$_is the_approximate detuning to the atomic lines._At smaller detunings, the_Faraday_rotation grows as