 the blanket covering them makes the recognition of individual rods difficult. This blanket is formed from residues—mostly CTAB—of the nano–rod synthesis. However, a SEM image of the same area is presented in fig. \[fig:HIM-SEM\](B). An acceleration voltage of 0.7keV and a probe current of 50pA has been used to record the image. Here, the rods are clearly visible and the CTAB blanket is only visible where it is very thick (e.g. in the upper right corner of the hole). The effect of the blanket is best seen by comparing the area marked with an arrow. From the two crevices visible in the SEM image one is not visible at all while the other is barely visible in the HIM image.

![Comparison of HIM and SEM images obtained from drop casted gold nano–rods. [(A) HIM SE image recoded with 35keV at a working distance of 6.5mm. (B) SEM image recorded at 0.7keV using the in lens detector and a working distance of 1.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM-SEM"}](HIM-SEM)

Figure \[fig:HIM\] shows high resolution HIM images and cross sections obtained from an area with a low density of gold nano–rods. The image has been recorded using an acceleration voltage of 20kV and an ion dose of $1.6\times10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. This corresponds to 375 ions per pixel. [A larger working distance had to be chosen to accommodate the BSHe detector.]{}

![HIM images and cross sectional analysis of gold nano–rods. (A) HIM SE image. (B) HIM BSHe image. (C) Composite image of (A) and (B). green: SE signal, red: BSHe signal, yellow: both signals present. (D) marked sections showing SE (blue) and BSHe (red) signals. The intensity profiles were fitted by Gaussians using a least square fit. [Primary energy 20keV; working distance 12.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM"}](HIM){width="90mm"}

A length of 45nm$\pm$10nm and a width 15nm$\pm$4nm has been obtained from the secondary electron image presented in fig. \[fig:HIM\](A). This results in an aspect ratio of 3 for these CTA
the blanket covering them makes the recognition of individual rods unmanageable. This blanket is form from residues — mostly CTAB — of the nano – gat deduction. However, a SEM image of the same area is present in fig.   \[fig: HIM - SEM\](B). An acceleration voltage of 0.7keV and a probe current of 50pA has been use to record the image. Here, the perch are clearly visible and the CTAB blanket is only visible where it is very dense (e.g. in the upper right corner of the hole). The effect of the blanket is best attend by comparing the area commemorate with an arrow. From the two crevices visible in the SEM image one is not visible at all while the other is scantily visible in the HIM image. 

! [ Comparison of HIM and SEM prototype obtained from drop casted gold nano – rod. [ (A) HIM SE image recoded with 35keV at a working distance of 6.5 mm. (B) SEM trope commemorate at 0.7keV using the in lens detector and a working distance of 1.3mm.]{}[]{data - label="fig: HIM - SEM"}](HIM - SEM) 

 Figure   \[fig: HIM\ ] shows high resolution HIM image and crisscross sections prevail from an area with a low density of gold nano – rod. The persona has been recorded using an acceleration electric potential of 20kV and an ion dose of $ 1.6\times10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. This corresponds to 375 ions per pixel. [ A larger working distance had to be chosen to adapt the BSHe detector. ] { } 

! [ HIM images and cross sectional analysis of gold nano – rod. (ampere) HIM SE image. (B) HIM BSHe image. (C) Composite image of (ampere) and (B). green: SE signal, red: BSHe signal, yellow: both signals present. (D) marked sections showing SE (blasphemous) and BSHe (red) signals. The volume profiles were match by Gaussians using a least straight fit. [ basal energy 20keV; working distance 12.3mm.]{}[]{data - label="fig: HIM"}](HIM){width="90 mm " } 

 A distance of 45nm$\pm$10 nm and a width 15nm$\pm$4 nm has been obtain from the secondary electron picture presented in fig.   \[fig: HIM\](A). This results in an aspect ratio of 3 for these CTA
 thf blanket covering them oakes the recoguution mf indjvidual fods difficult. This blanket ms firmed from residues—mostly CGAB—of the nano–rod synuhesis. However, a SEM imagc of fme sakx area is presekted in fig. \[xig:HIM-SEM\](B). An dczeperation voltage of 0.7keV and a probe curreny lf 50pA has been usec to dvcird the image. Here, the rods ade cleagly visible and tne CTAB blanket is only vidiblf where it is very thick (e.g. ib thq upper right corner of the hole). Thg effect of the blanket is best reen yy comparint rhe drea marked with an arrow. From the tfo crevoces visible ik the SEN image one is not vivible at all while the othes ns barely visible in rhw HIM imace.

![Cooparksoh pf HIM ajd AEM images obtained feom drop casted golc gqno–rods. [(A) HIM SE imwgq recoded with 35keV at a working distanct of 6.5jm. (B) SEM image recorded at 0.7keV using the in pens detestor and a working distance of 1.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM-SAM"}](HIM-ADM)

Fnnmre \[fkt:HLM\] shows high resolution HIM images and cross aevtpons obtained froi an area wotj s low density uf golb nzno–rods. The image jas beeg recirded usigg am acceleration voltage of 20kC and an ion eose of $1.6\times10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. Thns corresponbs to 375 ions per pixel. [A larger worying distance hwd to be dfosen to accommoaatv tha BSHe dtgector.]{}

![HIM images wnd cross seccional avalyxis of gold nano–gods. (A) HIM SE image. (B) HIL BSHg imaga. (C) Composlte image of (A) and (B). green: SE smjnal, red: BSHe shgndl, yelloc: both signals presqnt. (D) marked sgctions skowing SE (blue) ahd BSHe (red) signalf. The intensidi profiles wece fitted by Tauswians urkng a least sqiare fit. [Irnmary eneegy 20keV; working dixtavde 12.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fny:HUM"}](HIM){width="90mm"}

A lrnggh jf 45nk$\pi$10tm and a widdh 15no$\pm$4vk has been obtaiked frok the secondary elecdron image presented im nig. \[fig:HIM\](Q). This rqsults in an sspect ratio of 3 flr thxse CTE
the blanket covering them makes the recognition rods This blanket formed from residues—mostly a image of the area is presented fig. \[fig:HIM-SEM\](B). An acceleration voltage of and a probe current of 50pA has been used to record the image. the rods are clearly visible and the CTAB blanket is only visible where is thick in upper right corner of the hole). The effect of the blanket is best seen by comparing area marked with an arrow. From the two visible in the SEM one is not visible at while other is visible the image. ![Comparison of and SEM images obtained from drop casted gold nano–rods. [(A) HIM SE image recoded with 35keV at working distance (B) SEM recorded 0.7keV the in lens a working distance of 1.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM-SEM"}](HIM-SEM) Figure resolution HIM images and cross sections obtained from area with low density of gold nano–rods. The has been recorded using an acceleration voltage of and an ion dose of $1.6\times10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. This corresponds to 375 ions per pixel. [A larger had to be chosen accommodate the BSHe ![HIM and sectional of gold (A) HIM SE image. (B) HIM BSHe image. (C) Composite image (A) and (B). green: SE signal, red: BSHe signal, yellow: present. marked sections showing (blue) and BSHe (red) The profiles were fitted by a square 20keV; distance A length of 45nm$\pm$10nm a width 15nm$\pm$4nm has been from the secondary electron This results in an aspect ratio of 3 these CTA
 the blanket covering them makEs the recogNitioN of IndIvIduaL rodS difficult. This BLankEt is formed from residues—MostlY CtaB—of THe Nano–rOd synthESiS. hOweVeR, a sEM ImAGe Of the SamE area is Presented iN fiG. \[fIg:HIM-SEM\](B). An aCCeLeration voLtaGe of 0.7keV and a pRobE curreNt Of 50pa Has beEn uSed to Record THe imagE. Here, the rOdS Are cleARly visiBLE aNd thE CTAB blanket is onlY ViSIble where it is vEry thiCk (E.G. iN THe uPpeR right cornEr Of the HOle). The eFFeCT OF thE Blanket is best Seen by compaRIng The areA mArkED with aN arroW. FROm tHe two crevicEs viSible in thE SEM imAGe one is NOt visibLe at alL whIle The oTHeR iS baReLY viSIbLe iN The hIM image.

![coMpArisoN of Him AND SEM ImaGes oBtainEd from drop casTed Gold NAno–Rods. [(A) hIM SE ImagE rEcodeD with 35kEV at a WoRking distance of 6.5Mm. (B) SeM image reCorDeD at 0.7Kev usinG The in lEns DetEctor anD a workiNG diStANCE oF 1.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM-sEm"}](hiM-sEM)

FigurE \[fig:HIm\] ShOwS High resoLuTioN HIM IMAges aNd crOSs Sections ObtainED fRoM an area WiTh a low DeNsiTy oF gold NAno–rOds. The Image has Been rECorded using an aCCeleration volTAgE OF 20kv And aN ioN dose of $1.6\timeS10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. THIs coRresPOnDs tO 375 Ions pEr pixEl. [a LaRGer working distance hAd To be chOsen tO accommodate tHe BSHe deteCTOR.]{}

![HIM imagEs anD CrOSs sectional anaLysis Of gold nano–ROds. (A) HIM Se imagE. (B) HIM BSHE image. (C) CoMPOsite imaGe oF (A) aNd (B). GreEN: sE Signal, red: BSHe SIGnal, YeLlow: botH siGnals prEseNt. (D) MarKed SeCtions shoWing SE (blUe) AnD BsHE (reD) signALs. The intEnSitY pRofIles wERe fittEd by GAussIaNs USinG a least SQuARE fit. [prImAry eNerGy 20KeV; woRkinG DisTance 12.3mm.]{}[]{Data-label="Fig:hiM"}](HIm){wIdTh="90mm"}

A leNgth of 45nm$\pm$10nm aNd A width 15nm$\pm$4Nm Has Been obTAIned from The secondary electron imaGE presenTed In fig. \[Fig:HiM\](A). This reSulTs in an AspECt ratiO of 3 for These cTa
 the blanket covering them  makes the  reco gni tio nof i ndiv idual rods dif f icul t. This blanket is for med f ro m  res i du es—mo stly CT A B— o f  th ena no– ro d  s ynthe sis . Howev er, a SEMima ge  of the same ar ea is pres ent ed in fig. \ [fi g:HIM- SE M\] ( B). A n a ccele ration voltag e of 0.7k eV and ap robe cu r r en t of  50pA has been us e dt o record the i mage.He r e, t herod s are clea rl y vis i ble and th e C TAB blanket is on ly visiblew her e it i sver y  thick  (e.g .i n t he upper ri ghtcorner of  the h o le). Th e  effect  of th e b lan keti sbe stse e n b y  c omp a rin g the ar ea  m arked  wit h a n  arr ow.  Fro m the  two crevices  vi sibl e  in  theSEM i mage  o ne is  not v isibl eat all while th e ot her is ba rel yvis ib le in the HI M i mag e.

![C omparis o n o fH I M  a nd SEM images obta in e d  f rom drop  caste d  g ol d  nano–ro ds . [ (A)H I M SEimag e  r ecoded w ith 35 k eV  a t a wor ki ng dis ta nce  of  6.5m m . (B ) SEMimage re corde d  at 0.7keV usi n g the in lens de t e ct o r an d a  working di stan c e of  1.3 m m. ]{} [ ]{dat a-lab el = "f i g:HIM-SEM"}](HIM-SE M) 

Figu re \[ fig:HIM\] sho ws high re s o l ution HI M im a ge s  and cross sec tions  obtainedf rom an a rea w ith a lo w density o f gold n ano –ro ds.  Th e im age has beenr e cord ed  usinganacceler ati onvol tag eof 20kV a nd an io ndo se  o f $ 1.6\t i mes10^{1 7} $cm $^ {-2 }$. T h is cor respo ndsto  3 7 5 i ons per pi x e l. [ Ala rger  wo rk ing d ista n cehad tobe chosen  to acco mm od ate the  BSHe detecto r. ]{}

![HIM  i mag es and c ross sec tional analysis of gold nano–ro ds.  (A)HIMSE image.  (B ) HIMBSH e  image . (C)Compo si tei m age o f (A ) a nd  (B). gree n :  SE  sign al , re d: BSHe  signal, yellow: b o thsignals prese nt.  (D) m ar ked se c tio ns sho w i ng SE (blue) an d BSHe (re d) si gnals. The int en sity pr ofilesweref itted b y Gaussia ns usingaleas t squ are fit. [ Primaryenergy 20 k eV; w o rk ing d ist ance 1 2. 3mm .]{}[ ]{data - lab el="f ig:HIM "} ](HIM) {widt h= "90mm"}
A length of 45nm$\pm$1 0nm an d a w idt h 15nm$\p m$4 n m h as been o btai ned from t hesec ondar y e l ectro n im a ge  pr e sente d in fig. \[fi g :H IM\ ] ( A) . This resu l t s  in  an a spe c t rati o of  3 for these CTA
 the_blanket covering_them makes the recognition_of individual_rods_difficult. This_blanket_is formed from_residues—mostly CTAB—of the_nano–rod synthesis. However, a_SEM image of_the_same area is presented in fig. \[fig:HIM-SEM\](B). An acceleration voltage of 0.7keV and a probe_current_of 50pA_has_been_used to record the image._Here, the rods are clearly_visible and_the CTAB blanket is only visible where it_is_very thick (e.g._in the upper right corner of the hole). The_effect of the blanket is best_seen by comparing_the_area_marked with an arrow._From the two crevices visible in_the SEM image one is not_visible at all while the other is_barely visible in the HIM image.

![Comparison_of HIM and SEM images_obtained from_drop casted gold nano–rods. [(A)_HIM SE image_recoded with_35keV at a_working distance of 6.5mm. (B) SEM_image recorded at_0.7keV using the in lens detector_and_a working distance_of_1.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM-SEM"}](HIM-SEM)

Figure \[fig:HIM\]_shows high_resolution HIM images_and_cross sections_obtained_from an area with a low_density_of gold nano–rods. The image has been_recorded using an acceleration_voltage_of 20kV and an_ion dose of $1.6\times10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$. This_corresponds to 375 ions per pixel._[A larger_working distance_had to be chosen to accommodate the BSHe detector.]{}

![HIM images and_cross sectional analysis of gold nano–rods._(A) HIM SE image._(B) HIM_BSHe_image. (C) Composite_image_of (A)_and (B). green: SE signal, red: BSHe_signal, yellow:_both signals present. (D) marked sections_showing SE (blue) and_BSHe_(red) signals. The intensity profiles were_fitted by Gaussians using a least_square fit. [Primary energy 20keV;_working_distance_12.3mm.]{}[]{data-label="fig:HIM"}](HIM){width="90mm"}

A length of 45nm$\pm$10nm and_a width 15nm$\pm$4nm has been obtained_from the secondary_electron image presented in fig. \[fig:HIM\](A). This results_in_an aspect ratio of 3 for_these_CTA