 map $T_{n}$ to the output state $\omega(X_{n})$ and keep only the quantum part $T^{(q)}(\omega_{n})$. By the same contractivity argument as before we have $$\begin{aligned}
\|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} -  T^{(q)}_{n} (\omega_{n})\|_{1} &\leq&
\|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T^{(q)}_{n} (\rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}})\|_1+
\|\omega_{n} - \rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}}\|_{1}\nonumber\\
&\leq& R_{\max}(\vec{r}_{0},\tilde{L}) + o(1).\end{aligned}$$

At this point we can directly compare out state $T^{(q)}_{n} (\omega_{n})$ with the target $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$, or use a quantum amplifier to make up for the loss in amplitude induced by the initial use of a beam splitter. We follow the second ‘unbiased’ line. The amplifier can be described by a linear transformation on the mode $a$ of the oscillator together with an ancillary mode $b$ prepared in the vacuum. The output modes are $$\begin{aligned}
c_{1}&:=& \sqrt{t^{-1}} a+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} b^{\dagger}\\
c_{2}&:=&\sqrt{ t^{-1}} b+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} a^{\dagger}.\end{aligned}$$ Let $A$ denote the channel mapping the state of the mode $a$ to that of the amplified mode $c_{1}$. Then $$A\Phi_{t\vec{u}}= \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}$$ where $\Phi^{\prime}$ is a thermal equilibrium state with variance $$\tilde{V}= t^{-2}/2r_{0} +(t^{-1}-1)/2.$$

The final distance estimate (conditional on successful localisation of $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$) is $$\begin{aligned}
\| \Phi_{u} - A\circ T^{(q)}_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1} \!\!&\leq&\!
\|\Phi_{\vec{u}}- \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}\|_{1} +
\| \Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1}\
map $ T_{n}$ to the output state $ \omega(X_{n})$ and keep only the quantum character $ T^{(q)}(\omega_{n})$. By the like contractivity argument as before we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \|\Phi_{t\vec{u } } -   T^{(q)}_{n } (\omega_{n})\|_{1 } & \leq & 
 \|\Phi_{t\vec{u } } - T^{(q)}_{n } (\rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}})\|_1 + 
 \|\omega_{n } - \rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}}\|_{1}\nonumber\\ 
 & \leq & R_{\max}(\vec{r}_{0},\tilde{L }) + o(1).\end{aligned}$$ 

 At this item we can immediately compare out state $ T^{(q)}_{n } (\omega_{n})$ with the target $ \Phi_{\vec{u}}$, or use a quantum amplifier to induce up for the loss in amplitude induced by the initial use of a beam splitter. We surveil the second ‘ unbiased ’ line. The amplifier can be report by a analogue transformation on the mode $ a$ of the oscillator together with an accessory mode $ b$ prepare in the void. The output modes are $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 c_{1}&:= & \sqrt{t^{-1 } } a+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1 } b^{\dagger}\\ 
 c_{2}&:=&\sqrt { t^{-1 } } b+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1 } a^{\dagger}.\end{aligned}$$ Let $ A$ announce the channel mapping the state of the mode $ a$ to that of the amplified manner $ c_{1}$. Then $ $ A\Phi_{t\vec{u}}= \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}$$ where $ \Phi^{\prime}$ is a thermal equilibrium state with variance $ $ \tilde{V}= t^{-2}/2r_{0 } + (t^{-1}-1)/2.$$ 

 The final distance estimate (conditional on successful localization of function of $ \Phi_{\vec{u}}$) is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \| \Phi_{u } - A\circ T^{(q)}_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1 } \!\!&\leq&\! 
 \|\Phi_{\vec{u}}- \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}\|_{1 } + 
 \| \Phi_{t\vec{u } } - T_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1}\
 mao $T_{n}$ to the output state $\omega(X_{n})$ and kegp only vhe quahtum parg $T^{(q)}(\omega_{n})$. By the same contrecticity qrgument as before we fave $$\begij{aligned}
\|\Phi_{t\tec{u}} -  T^{(q)}_{n} (\omega_{i})\|_{1} &\leq&
\|\Phi_{b\rec{u}} - B^{(q)}_{n} (\rko^{i}_{t\vec{u}})\|_1+
\|\omega_{n} - \rmo^{n}_{t\vec{u}}\|_{1}\nongmber\\
&\leq& R_{\max}(\vac{f}_{0},\tnlde{L}) + o(1).\end{aligned}$$

At this point we cwn direvtpy compare out staue $E^{(q)}_{n} (\kmega_{n})$ with the target $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$, or hse a qlantum amplifier yo make up for the loss in amppitude induced by hhe initial use if a beam spuitter. We follow the sgcond ‘unbiased’ line. The amplifief can be descrivee bj a linear tcansfogmation on thc mode $d$ of thr oscillator tpgevher with an ancillary move $b$ prepared in the vacuum. Tve output modes are $$\bwgin{anignad}
c_{1}&:=& \rwrt{g^{-1}} a+ \sarf{t^{-1}-1} b^{\dahgec}\\
c_{2}&:=&\sqrt{ t^{-1}} b+ \aqrt{t^{-1}-1} a^{\daggwr}.\end{aligned}$$ Let $A$ cegite the channsl map[igg the state of the mode $a$ to that of tve zmplified mode $c_{1}$. Then $$A\Phi_{t\vec{u}}= \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}$$ where $\Phy^{\prime}$ is a thermal equilibrium state with varianwe $$\timae{V}= t^{-2}/2v_{0} +(t^{-1}-1)/2.$$

Tfw vinal distance estimate (conditional on succesfruk kocalisation on $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$) is $$\begin{sllgmgd}
\| \Phi_{u} - A\circ T^{(q)}_{n}(\omzfa_{h})\|_{1} \!\!&\leq&\!
\|\Phi_{\vec{u}}- \Phi^{\prlme}_{\vec{u}}\|_{1} +
\| \Phi_{r\vec{u}} - T_{n}(\jmegs_{n})\|_{1}\
map $T_{n}$ to the output state $\omega(X_{n})$ only quantum part By the same have \|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T^{(q)}_{n} &\leq& \|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} - (\rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}})\|_1+ \|\omega_{n} - \rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}}\|_{1}\nonumber\\ &\leq& R_{\max}(\vec{r}_{0},\tilde{L}) o(1).\end{aligned}$$ At this point we can directly compare out state $T^{(q)}_{n} (\omega_{n})$ with target $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$, or use a quantum amplifier to make up for the loss amplitude by initial of a beam splitter. We follow the second ‘unbiased’ line. The amplifier can be described by linear transformation on the mode $a$ of the together with an ancillary $b$ prepared in the vacuum. output are $$\begin{aligned} \sqrt{t^{-1}} \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} c_{2}&:=&\sqrt{ t^{-1}} b+ a^{\dagger}.\end{aligned}$$ Let $A$ denote the channel mapping the state of the mode $a$ to that of the mode $c_{1}$. \Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}$$ where is thermal state with variance +(t^{-1}-1)/2.$$ The final distance estimate (conditional of $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$) is $$\begin{aligned} \| \Phi_{u} - A\circ \!\!&\leq&\! \|\Phi_{\vec{u}}- + \| \Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1}\
 map $T_{n}$ to the output state $\omegA(X_{n})$ and keep Only tHe qUanTuM parT $T^{(q)}(\oMega_{n})$. By the same COntrActivity argument as befoRe we hAvE $$\BegiN{AlIgned}
\|\phi_{t\vec{U}} -  t^{(q)}_{N} (\OMegA_{n})\|_{1} &\LeQ&
\|\PhI_{t\VEc{U}} - T^{(q)}_{n} (\rHo^{n}_{T\vec{u}})\|_1+
\|\omEga_{n} - \rho^{n}_{t\vEc{u}}\|_{1}\NoNumber\\
&\leq& R_{\maX}(\VeC{r}_{0},\tilde{L}) + o(1).\eNd{aLigned}$$

At this PoiNt we caN dIreCTly coMpaRe out State $T^{(Q)}_{N} (\omega_{N})$ with the tArGEt $\Phi_{\vEC{u}}$, or use A QUaNtum Amplifier to make up FOr THe loss in amplitUde indUcED bY THe iNitIal use of a bEaM spliTTer. We foLLoW THE seCOnd ‘unbiased’ liNe. The amplifIEr cAn be deScRibED by a liNear tRaNSfoRmation on thE modE $a$ of the osCillatOR togethER with an AncillAry ModE $b$ prEPaReD in ThE VacUUm. the OUtpUt modes aRe $$\BeGin{alIgneD}
C_{1}&:=& \SQRt{t^{-1}} a+ \SqrT{t^{-1}-1} b^{\dAgger}\\
C_{2}&:=&\sqrt{ t^{-1}} b+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} a^{\DagGer}.\eND{alIgned}$$ let $A$ dEnotE tHe chaNnel maPping ThE state of the mode $A$ to tHat of the aMplIfIed MoDe $c_{1}$. ThEN $$A\Phi_{t\Vec{U}}= \PhI^{\prime}_{\vEc{u}}$$ wherE $\phi^{\PrIME}$ Is A thermal equilibriuM sTATe With variAnce $$\tiLDe{v}= t^{-2}/2R_{0} +(T^{-1}-1)/2.$$

The finaL dIstAnce ESTimatE (conDItIonal on sUccessFUl LoCalisatIoN of $\Phi_{\VeC{u}}$) iS $$\beGin{alIGned}
\| \phi_{u} - A\cIrc T^{(q)}_{n}(\omEga_{n})\|_{1} \!\!&\lEQ&\!
\|\Phi_{\vec{u}}- \Phi^{\priME}_{\vec{u}}\|_{1} +
\| \Phi_{t\vec{u}} - t_{N}(\oMEGa_{N})\|_{1}\
 map $T_{n}$ to the output  state $\o mega( X_{ n}) $andkeep  only the quan t um p art $T^{(q)}(\omega_{n })$.By thes am e con tractiv i ty a rgu me nt  as  b e fo re we  ha ve $$\b egin{align ed} 
\ |\Phi_{t\vec { u} } -  T^{(q )}_ {n} (\omega_ {n} )\|_{1 }&\l e q&
\| \Ph i_{t\ vec{u} }  - T^{ (q)}_{n}(\ r ho^{n} _ {t\vec{ u } }) \|_1 +
\|\omega_{n} -\ rh o ^{n}_{t\vec{u} }\|_{1 }\ n on u m ber \\&\leq& R_{ \m ax}(\ v ec{r}_{ 0 }, \ t i lde { L}) + o(1).\e nd{aligned} $ $
At thi spoi n t we c an di re c tly  compare ou t st ate $T^{( q)}_{n }  (\omeg a _{n})$with t hetar get$ \P hi _{\ ve c {u} } $,  or use  a quant um  a mplif iert o m akeupforthe l oss in amplit ude  ind u ced  by t he in itia luse o f a be am sp li tter. We follow  the  second ‘ unb ia sed ’line. The am pli fie r can b e descr i bed  b y a  l inear transformati on o nthe mode  $a$ o f  t he oscillat or  to geth e r  with  ana nc illary m ode $b $  p re pared i nthe va cu um.  Th e out p ut m odes a re $$\be gin{a l igned}
c_{1}&: = & \sqrt{t^{-1 } }a +  \ s qrt{ t^{ -1}-1} b^{\ dagg e r}\\ 
c_{ 2 }& :=& \ sqrt{  t^{- 1} }  b +  \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} a^ {\ dagger }.\en d{aligned}$$Let $A$ de n o t e the ch anne l  m a pping the stat e ofthe mode $ a $ to tha t ofthe ampl ified mod e $c_{1}$.  Th en$$A \Ph i _ {t \vec{u}}= \Ph i ^ {\pr im e}_{\ve c{u }}$$ wh ere  $\ Phi ^{\ pr ime}$ isa therma leq ui li bri um st a te withva ria nc e $ $\til d e{V}=t^{-2 }/2r _{ 0} +(t ^{-1}-1 ) /2 . $ $

T he  f inal  di st anceesti m ate  (condi tional on  su c cess fu llocalis ation of $\Ph i_ {\vec{u}}$ )is$$\beg i n {aligned }
\| \Phi_{u} - A\circT ^{(q)}_ {n} (\ome ga_{ n})\|_{1}  \! \!&\le q&\ ! 
\|\Ph i_{\ve c{u}} -\Ph i ^ {\pri m e }_ {\v ec {u}}\|_{1} + 
\|  \Phi _{ t\ve c{u}} -  T_{n}(\omega_{n}) \ |_{ 1}\
 map_$T_{n}$ to_the output state $\omega(X_{n})$_and keep_only_the quantum_part_$T^{(q)}(\omega_{n})$. By the_same contractivity argument_as before we have_$$\begin{aligned}
\|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} - _T^{(q)}_{n}_(\omega_{n})\|_{1} &\leq&
\|\Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T^{(q)}_{n} (\rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}})\|_1+
\|\omega_{n} - \rho^{n}_{t\vec{u}}\|_{1}\nonumber\\
&\leq& R_{\max}(\vec{r}_{0},\tilde{L}) + o(1).\end{aligned}$$

At this point we can_directly_compare out_state_$T^{(q)}_{n}_(\omega_{n})$ with the target $\Phi_{\vec{u}}$,_or use a quantum amplifier_to make_up for the loss in amplitude induced by_the_initial use of_a beam splitter. We follow the second ‘unbiased’ line._The amplifier can be described by_a linear transformation_on_the_mode $a$ of the_oscillator together with an ancillary mode_$b$ prepared in the vacuum. The_output modes are $$\begin{aligned}
c_{1}&:=& \sqrt{t^{-1}} a+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1}_b^{\dagger}\\
c_{2}&:=&\sqrt{ t^{-1}} b+ \sqrt{t^{-1}-1} a^{\dagger}.\end{aligned}$$ Let_$A$ denote the channel mapping_the state_of the mode $a$ to_that of the_amplified mode_$c_{1}$. Then $$A\Phi_{t\vec{u}}=_\Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}$$ where $\Phi^{\prime}$ is a thermal_equilibrium state with_variance $$\tilde{V}= t^{-2}/2r_{0} +(t^{-1}-1)/2.$$

The final distance_estimate_(conditional on successful_localisation_of_$\Phi_{\vec{u}}$) is_$$\begin{aligned}
\| \Phi_{u} -_A\circ_T^{(q)}_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1} \!\!&\leq&\!
\|\Phi_{\vec{u}}-_\Phi^{\prime}_{\vec{u}}\|_{1}_+
\| \Phi_{t\vec{u}} - T_{n}(\omega_{n})\|_{1}\