 the one we found, it is centred in one of the split peaks. Nevertheless, looking at their figure it is possible to observe three peaks that are consistent with the scenario described above.\
The stellar mass is calculated by @Mantegazza2012 using a grid of models. The value they find, 2.10 to 2.18 $M_{\odot}$, is higher than ours, $1.5\pm 0.3 M_{\odot}$ (see Table \[t:4dScu\] and the beginning of Sect. \[s:regular\] for more details), but their models do not reproduce the expected limits of the modes at the same time as the observed large separation. Nevertheless, both studies find that this star has a moderate rotation rate and low inclination. This is in agreement with its low projected velocity.\
Considering the other three stars, we find that KIC 5892969 has a low rotation rate, $\Omega / \Omega_{k} \approx 0.14$. This is confirmed by the signature of the surface rotation: two high amplitude peaks in the low frequency regime of the power spectra found at 1.235 and 2.465 $\mu$Hz with amplitudes around 100 and 500 ppm, respectively. Therefore, the values of the polar and equatorial radii are similar to the radius of a star with spherical symmetry (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). In addition, the values of the mass and radius are equal to those found by @Huber2014, within errors.\
In contrast, CID 8669 shows a high projected velocity, $v \sin i \sim$200 km/s, suggesting that this star could be a fast rotator with a very high rotation rate, the same as we find with our methodology (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). The high oblateness of this star produces a difference of temperature between the poles and the equator of around 320 K, $\sim4.5$ %.\
The case of CID 3619 has to be differentiated from the others. We confirm that this star might be a hybrid star because its convective efficiency ($\mathrm{log}~\Gamma$) is higher, and the kinetic energy of the waves ($\mathrm{log}~E_{kin}$) is lower, than the typical values for [[$\delta$ Scuti ]{}]{}stars (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). @Claret1998 estimate that stars with this temperature can present a more
the one we found, it is centred in one of the split peaks. however, expect at their figure it is potential to observe three peak that are consistent with the scenario identify above.\ 
 The leading mass is calculated by @Mantegazza2012 using a grid of models. The value they witness, 2.10 to 2.18 $ M_{\odot}$, is higher than ours, $ 1.5\pm 0.3 M_{\odot}$ (see Table   \[t:4dScu\ ] and the beginning of Sect.   \[s: regular\ ] for more details), but their models do not reproduce the expected limit of the modes at the same time as the observe large separation. Nevertheless, both studies detect that this star has a moderate rotation rate and low inclination. This is in agreement with its humble projected velocity.\ 
 Considering the other three stars, we find that KIC   5892969 hold a low rotation rate, $ \Omega / \Omega_{k } \approx 0.14$. This is confirmed by the signature of the surface rotation: two high amplitude peaks in the low frequency government of the power spectra found at 1.235 and 2.465 $ \mu$Hz with amplitude around 100 and 500 ppm, respectively. Therefore, the values of the polar and equatorial radii are exchangeable to the radius of a star with spherical symmetry (determine Table   \[t:4dScu\ ]). In addition, the values of the mass and radius are equal to those found by @Huber2014, within errors.\ 
 In line, CID   8669 shows a high projected velocity, $ v \sin i \sim$200 km / s, suggesting that this star could be a debauched rotator with a very high rotation rate, the same as we find with our methodology (see Table   \[t:4dScu\ ]). The eminent oblateness of this star produces a difference of temperature between the pole and the equator of around 320 K, $ \sim4.5 $% .\ 
 The lawsuit of CID   3619 has to be differentiated from the others. We confirm that this star topology might be a hybrid star because its convective efficiency ($ \mathrm{log}~\Gamma$) is gamey, and the kinetic energy of the wave ($ \mathrm{log}~E_{kin}$) is lower, than the distinctive values for [ [ $ \delta$   Scuti ] { } ] { } stars (see Table   \[t:4dScu\ ]). @Claret1998 estimate that star with this temperature can present a more
 thf one we found, it is cenured in one of thg wplit 'eaks. Nsvertheldss, looking at their figure mt iw poswible to observe three peaks thwt are cinsiwrent with vge scenario dsdcriyev above.\
The stelkar mass iv calculated bf @Oautegazza2012 using a grid of models. The dalue tnej find, 2.10 to 2.18 $M_{\oqot}$, ps higgvr than ours, $1.5\pm 0.3 M_{\odot}$ (see Tabls \[t:4dScu\] end the beginnimg of Sect. \[s:regular\] for morf dehails), but their mofels do not repwiduce the exoected limpcs of the mkdes at the same time as the obrerveb large sepqrqtilt. Neverthelxss, bonh studies fikc that this syar has a modevate cotarion rate and low incnination. This is ig agreemett with its low prohexted eelowity.\
Zinskdediig fhe otjer three stads, we find rhat KIC 5892969 has a low toeqtion rate, $\Omsga / \Oieda_{k} \approx 0.14$. This is confirmed by the sicnafure of the surface rotqtion: two high amplitode peaks yn the low frequency regime of the power spectra xound xt 1.235 akd 2.465 $\oy$Hx with amplitudes around 100 and 500 ppm, respectivejg. Uhegefore, the values of the polsr amq equatorial tadii axs aimilar to the radlus of w stae with sprerival symmetry (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). In addition, rhe values of the lass and rabius ate equsl to those found by @Huyer2014, wifhin errors.\
Ln contraag, CID 8669 shows a hieh irojacted velocity, $v \sin i \sim$200 km/s, suggxstiny that tfis xtar cjuld be a vast vmtator with a very high rmtation rahe, the same as we find with our methodology (sge Dabne \[t:4dScu\]). Che hinh oblateness os this star prpduces c diffdrence of nemperatuce between tre poles and dje equator oh around 320 K, $\sum4.5$ %.\
Tye case uf CID 3619 has to ne differvnuiated fron the others. We cokfirm fhat this star nigyt be a hybrid xtaf bqcwuxe hts convectiee ewfizoency ($\mathrm{log}~\Gcmoa$) ix higher, and the kinatic energy of the wavrs ($\mathrm{lig}~E_{kin}$) if lower, than yhe typical values for [[$\velta$ Sruti ]{}]{}syarf (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). @Claret1998 estimafe that sharf with this eempcratore can prexent a more
the one we found, it is centred of split peaks. looking at their observe peaks that are with the scenario above.\ The stellar mass is calculated @Mantegazza2012 using a grid of models. The value they find, 2.10 to 2.18 is higher than ours, $1.5\pm 0.3 M_{\odot}$ (see Table \[t:4dScu\] and the beginning Sect. for details), their models do not reproduce the expected limits of the modes at the same time as observed large separation. Nevertheless, both studies find that star has a moderate rate and low inclination. This in with its projected Considering other three stars, find that KIC 5892969 has a low rotation rate, $\Omega / \Omega_{k} \approx 0.14$. This is confirmed the signature surface rotation: high peaks the low frequency the power spectra found at 1.235 with amplitudes around 100 and 500 ppm, respectively. the values the polar and equatorial radii are to the radius of a star with spherical (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). In addition, the values of the mass and radius are equal to by @Huber2014, within errors.\ contrast, CID 8669 a projected $v i \sim$200 suggesting that this star could be a fast rotator with a high rotation rate, the same as we find with our Table The high oblateness this star produces a of between the poles and of 320 The of 3619 has to be from the others. We confirm this star might be convective efficiency ($\mathrm{log}~\Gamma$) is higher, and the kinetic of the waves ($\mathrm{log}~E_{kin}$) is lower, than typical values for [[$\delta$ Scuti ]{}]{}stars (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). @Claret1998 estimate that with this present a more
 the one we found, it is centred iN one of the sPlit pEakS. NeVeRtheLess, Looking at their FIgurE it is possible to observe Three PeAKs thAT aRe conSistent WItH THe sCeNaRio DeSCrIbed aBovE.\
The steLlar mass is CalCuLated by @ManteGAzZa2012 using a grId oF models. The vaLue They fiNd, 2.10 To 2.18 $M_{\ODot}$, is HigHer thAn ours, $1.5\PM 0.3 M_{\odot}$ (See Table \[t:4DSCU\] and thE BeginniNG Of sect. \[S:regular\] for more deTAiLS), but their modelS do not RePRoDUCe tHe eXpected limItS of thE Modes at THe SAME tiME as the observeD large separATioN. NeverThEleSS, both sTudieS fINd tHat this star Has a Moderate rOtatioN Rate and LOw incliNation. thiS is In agREeMeNt wItH Its LOw ProJEctEd velociTy.\
coNsideRing THE OTher ThrEe stArs, we Find that KIC 5892969 haS a lOw roTAtiOn ratE, $\OmegA / \OmeGa_{K} \apprOx 0.14$. This Is conFiRmed by the signatUre oF the surfaCe rOtAtiOn: Two hiGH ampliTudE peAks in thE low freQUenCy REGImE of the power spectra FoUND aT 1.235 and 2.465 $\mu$Hz With amPLiTuDEs around 100 AnD 500 ppM, resPECtiveLy. ThEReFore, the vAlues oF ThE pOlar and EqUatoriAl RadIi aRe simILar tO the raDius of a sTar wiTH spherical symmETry (see Table \[t:4dsCu\]). iN AdDItioN, thE values of thE masS And rAdiuS ArE eqUAl to tHose fOuND bY @huber2014, within errors.\
In CoNtrast, cID 8669 shOws a high projeCted velociTY, $V \Sin i \sim$200 kM/s, suGGeSTing that this stAr couLd be a fast rOTator witH a verY high rotAtion rate, THE same as wE fiNd wIth Our METhOdology (see TabLE \[T:4dScU\]). THe high oBlaTeness oF thIs sTar ProDuCes a diffeRence of tEmPeRaTuRe bEtweeN The poles AnD thE eQuaTor of ARound 320 K, $\Sim4.5$ %.\
ThE casE oF Cid 3619 haS to be diFFeRENtiaTeD fRom tHe oThErs. We ConfIRm tHat this Star might Be a HYbriD sTaR becausE its convectivE eFficiency ($\mAtHrm{Log}~\GamMA$) Is higher, And the kinetic energy of thE Waves ($\maThrM{log}~E_{Kin}$) iS lower, thaN thE typicAl vALues foR [[$\delta$ scuti ]{}]{}StArs (SEE TablE \[T:4DSCu\]). @CLaRet1998 estimatE THat Stars WiTh thIs tempeRature can present a mORe
 the one we found, it is c entred inone o f t hesp litpeak s. Nevertheles s , lo oking at their figureit is  p o ssib l eto ob serve t h re e pea ks  t hat  a r econsi ste nt with  the scena rio  d escribed abo v e. \
The stel lar  mass is cal cul ated b y@Ma n tegaz za2 012 u sing a grid o f models.  T h e valu e  they f i n d,  2.1 0 to 2.18 $M_{\od o t} $ , is higher th an our s, $1 . 5 \pm  0. 3 M_{\odot }$  (see Table \ [ t: 4 d S cu\ ]  and the begi nning of Se c t.\[s:re gu lar \ ] formorede t ail s), but the ir m odels donot re p roducet he expe cted l imi tsof t h emo des  a t  th e  s ame tim e as the  o bs erved  lar g e s epar ati on.Never theless, both  st udie s  fi nd th at th is s ta r has  a mod erate  r otation rate an d lo w inclina tio n.  Th is  is i n  agree men t w ith its  low pr o jec te d v el ocity.\
Considerin gt h eother th ree st a rs ,w e find t ha t K IC 5 8 9 2969hasa  l ow rotat ion ra t e,  $ \Omega/\Omega _{ k}\ap prox0 .14$ . This  is conf irmed by the signatu r e of the surf a ce r ot a tion : t wo high amp litu d e pe aksi nthe low f reque nc y  r e gime of the power s pe ctra f oundat 1.235 and2.465 $\mu $ H z  with am plit u de s  around 100 an d 500  ppm, resp e ctively.  Ther efore, t he values o f the po lar  an d e qua t o ri al radii ares i mila rto therad ius ofa s tar  wi thsp herical s ymmetry(s ee  T ab le\[t:4 d Scu\]).In  ad di tio n, th e  value s ofthema ss and  radius ar e equa lto  tho sefo und b y @H u ber 2014, w ithin err ors . \
In  c on trast,CID 8669 show sa high pro je cte d velo c i ty, $v \ sin i \sim$200 km/s, su g gesting  th at th is s tar could  be  a fas t r o tatorwith a  very  h igh r otati o n  r ate ,the same a s wefindwi th o ur meth odology (see Table \[t :4dScu\]). Th e h igho b la ten e ss ofth i s s t a r produces a di fference o ft em perature b e twe en  the po les and  thee quatorof around  320 K, $ \s im4. 5 $  %. \
The case  of CID3619 hast o bed if feren tia ted fr om  th e oth ers. W e  co nfirm  thatth is sta r mig ht  be a hy brid star because its c onvect ive e ffi ciency ($ \ma t hrm {log}~\Ga mma$ ) is highe r,and  thekin e tic e nerg y  o f t h e wav es ( $ \mathrm{l o g} ~E_ { k in }$) is lowe r , tha n the  ty p ical v alue s for [[$\delta$S cuti ]{}]{}sta rs ( s e e T abl e  \[t :4 dScu\]). @Clar et1 99 8 estimate  t hat stars w ith this  t e mpera ture c an pre sent am o re 
 the_one we_found, it is centred_in one_of_the split_peaks._Nevertheless, looking at_their figure it_is possible to observe_three peaks that_are_consistent with the scenario described above.\
The stellar mass is calculated by @Mantegazza2012 using a_grid_of models._The_value_they find, 2.10 to 2.18_$M_{\odot}$, is higher than ours,_$1.5\pm 0.3_M_{\odot}$ (see Table \[t:4dScu\] and the beginning of Sect. \[s:regular\]_for_more details), but_their models do not reproduce the expected limits of_the modes at the same time_as the observed_large_separation._Nevertheless, both studies find_that this star has a moderate_rotation rate and low inclination. This_is in agreement with its low projected_velocity.\
Considering the other three stars, we_find that KIC 5892969 has a_low rotation_rate, $\Omega / \Omega_{k} \approx_0.14$. This is_confirmed by_the signature of_the surface rotation: two high amplitude_peaks in the_low frequency regime of the power_spectra_found at 1.235_and_2.465_$\mu$Hz with_amplitudes around 100_and_500 ppm,_respectively._Therefore, the values of the polar_and_equatorial radii are similar to the radius_of a star with_spherical_symmetry (see Table \[t:4dScu\]). In_addition, the values of the_mass and radius are equal to_those found_by @Huber2014,_within errors.\
In contrast, CID 8669 shows a high projected velocity, $v \sin_i \sim$200 km/s, suggesting that this_star could be a_fast rotator_with_a very high_rotation_rate, the_same as we find with our methodology_(see Table \[t:4dScu\])._The high oblateness of this star_produces a difference of_temperature_between the poles and the equator_of around 320 K, $\sim4.5$ %.\
The_case of CID 3619 has to_be_differentiated_from the others. We confirm_that this star might be a_hybrid star because_its convective efficiency ($\mathrm{log}~\Gamma$) is higher, and_the_kinetic energy of the waves ($\mathrm{log}~E_{kin}$)_is_lower, than the typical values for_[[$\delta$ Scuti_]{}]{}stars_(see Table \[t:4dScu\]). @Claret1998 estimate that_stars with this temperature can present_a more