}}$, $L(k)$ is Fredholm of index $0$ for all $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ and the set of $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ where $L(k)$ is not invertible is discrete.

We are interested in the case where $\mathcal{L}$ is not invertible.

\[h:3.2\] There exists a unique $k_*$ and a unique (up to scalar multiples) $e_0\neq 0$ such that $L(k_*)e_0=0$. We then scale $\langle e_0, e_0 \rangle=1$.

In particular, $\lambda=0$ belongs to the essential spectrum of $\mathcal{L}$. We can assume without loss of generality that $k_*=0$, possibly conjugating $\mathcal{L}$ with the multiplication operator ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}k_* x}$. We write $e_0^*$ for the kernel of the adjoint $L^*(0)$ with $\langle e_0^*, e_0^*\rangle=1$.

#### Spatial multiplicities in the essential spectrum.

We are interested in the unfolding of the zero-eigenvalue at $k=0$ for the family $L(k)$. We therefore view $L(k)$ as an analytic operator pencil and define the *spatial multiplicity* as the multiplicity of $k=0$ as an eigenvalue of the operator pencil. Since such constructions are possibly not widely known, and the use here is less standard, we include the relevant constructions.

Recall that, according to Hypothesis \[h:3.2\], the kernel of $L(0)$ is one-dimensional.

\[c:eigenexp\] There exists $m>0$, maximal, and $e(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}e_jk^j$ such that $$\label{e:LE2}
L(k)e(k)=\lambda_mk^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k^{m+1}),$$ or, equivalently, $$\sum_{j=0}^k L_je_{k-j}=0,\quad k=0,\ldots,m-1; \qquad   \lambda_m:=\left\langle \sum_{j=0}^{m-1} L_{m-j}e_j,e_0^*\right\rangle\neq  0
} } $, $ L(k)$ is Fredholm of index $ 0 $ for all $ k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ and the set of $ k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ where $ L(k)$ is not invertible is discrete. 

 We are interested in the case where $ \mathcal{L}$ is not invertible. 

 \[h:3.2\ ] There exist a alone $ k_*$ and a unique (up to scalar multiples) $ e_0\neq 0 $ such that $ L(k_*)e_0=0$. We then scale $ \langle e_0, e_0 \rangle=1$. 

 In particular, $ \lambda=0 $ belong to the essential spectrum of $ \mathcal{L}$. We can assume without passing of generalization that $ k_*=0 $, possibly conjugating $ \mathcal{L}$ with the multiplication operator $ { \mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}k _ * x}$. We write $ e_0^*$ for the kernel of the adjoint $ L^*(0)$ with $ \langle e_0^ *, e_0^*\rangle=1$. 

 # # # # Spatial multiplicities in the substantive spectrum. 

 We are interested in the unfolding of the zero - eigenvalue at $ k=0 $ for the family $ L(k)$. We consequently view $ L(k)$ as an analytic operator pencil and define the * spatial multiplicity * as the multiplicity of $ k=0 $ as an eigenvalue of the operator pencil. Since such constructions are possibly not wide known, and the use here is less standard, we include the relevant construction. 

 Recall that, according to Hypothesis \[h:3.2\ ], the kernel of $ L(0)$ is one - dimensional. 

 \[c: eigenexp\ ] There exists $ m>0 $, maximal, and $ e(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}e_jk^j$ such that $ $ \label{e: LE2 } 
 L(k)e(k)=\lambda_mk^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k^{m+1}),$$ or, equivalently, $ $ \sum_{j=0}^k L_je_{k - j}=0,\quad k=0,\ldots, m-1; \qquad    \lambda_m:=\left\langle \sum_{j=0}^{m-1 } L_{m - j}e_j, e_0^*\right\rangle\neq   0
}}$, $L(k)$ is Fredholm of index $0$ fur all $k\in{\mathby{E}}$ and vhe set of $k\in{\mxthbb{R}}$ where $L(k)$ is not inverviblw is eiscrete.

We are interesged in thv case whwre $\nqthcal{L}$ is not invcxtibls.

\[m:3.2\] Thexe exists a uniqoe $k_*$ and a utique (up to scdlxr multiples) $e_0\neq 0$ such that $L(k_*)e_0=0$. We tren scake $\langle e_0, e_0 \raggle=1$.

Pn parfpcmlar, $\lambda=0$ belongs to the essenfial sptctrum of $\mathcal{L}$. We can assume without losd of generality that $k_*=0$, possibly cinjudqting $\mathcau{L}$ with tht kultiplicajion operator ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}k_* x}$. De wrnte $e_0^*$ for tye kegtel of the edjoinn $L^*(0)$ with $\langle e_0^*, e_0^*\ratgle=1$.

#### Spstial multipligitiev ib the essential spectcum.

We are interested in the utfklding of the zeri-eugenvdlue at $y=0$ fof tge fzmily $P(k)$. Xe therefors view $L(k)$ aw an analytic operauor irncil and derine tre *spatial multiplicity* as the multipliciuy of $k=0$ as an eigenvalue of rhe operator pencil. Slnce such constructions are possibly not widely known, and dhe uad htrc kw pess standard, we include the relevant construsfipnx.

Recall that, agcording to Hypothrsls \[r:3.2\], the kernel uf $L(0)$ is ohe-dimensional.

\[c:eigejexp\] Thgre exusts $m>0$, mavimak, and $e(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}e_jk^j$ such that $$\label{e:LE2}
L(k)e(h)=\oambda_mk^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k^{l+1}),$$ or, equivauentky, $$\suk_{j=0}^k L_je_{k-j}=0,\quad k=0,\ldots,m-1; \qduad   \lambda_m:=\lfft\langle \rum_{j=0}^{m-1} L_{m-j}e_j,e_0^*\righg\rakgla\neq  0
}}$, $L(k)$ is Fredholm of index $0$ $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ the set $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ where $L(k)$ We interested in the where $\mathcal{L}$ is invertible. \[h:3.2\] There exists a unique and a unique (up to scalar multiples) $e_0\neq 0$ such that $L(k_*)e_0=0$. We scale $\langle e_0, e_0 \rangle=1$. In particular, $\lambda=0$ belongs to the essential spectrum $\mathcal{L}$. can without of generality that $k_*=0$, possibly conjugating $\mathcal{L}$ with the multiplication operator ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}k_* x}$. We write $e_0^*$ the kernel of the adjoint $L^*(0)$ with $\langle e_0^*\rangle=1$. #### Spatial multiplicities the essential spectrum. We are in unfolding of zero-eigenvalue $k=0$ the family $L(k)$. therefore view $L(k)$ as an analytic operator pencil and define the *spatial multiplicity* as the multiplicity of as an the operator Since constructions possibly not widely the use here is less standard, relevant constructions. Recall that, according to Hypothesis \[h:3.2\], kernel of is one-dimensional. \[c:eigenexp\] There exists $m>0$, and $e(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}e_jk^j$ such that $$\label{e:LE2} L(k)e(k)=\lambda_mk^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k^{m+1}),$$ or, equivalently, L_je_{k-j}=0,\quad k=0,\ldots,m-1; \qquad \lambda_m:=\left\langle \sum_{j=0}^{m-1} L_{m-j}e_j,e_0^*\right\rangle\neq 0
}}$, $L(k)$ is Fredholm of index $0$ for all $K\in{\mathbb{R}}$ And thE seT of $K\iN{\matHbb{R}}$ Where $L(k)$ is not inVErtiBle is discrete.

We are inteResteD iN The cASe Where $\Mathcal{l}$ Is NOT inVeRtIblE.

\[h:3.2\] tHeRe exiSts A unique $K_*$ and a uniquE (up To Scalar multipLEs) $E_0\neq 0$ such thAt $L(K_*)e_0=0$. We then scalE $\laNgle e_0, e_0 \RaNglE=1$.

in parTicUlar, $\lAmbda=0$ bELongs tO the essenTiAL spectRUm of $\matHCAl{l}$. We cAn assume without loSS oF Generality that $K_*=0$, possiBlY CoNJUgaTinG $\mathcal{L}$ wItH the mULtiplicATiON OPerATor ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\matHrm{i}}k_* x}$. We wriTE $e_0^*$ fOr the kErNel OF the adJoint $l^*(0)$ wITh $\lAngle e_0^*, e_0^*\rangLe=1$.

#### SpAtial multIpliciTIes in thE EssentiAl specTruM.

We Are iNTeReSteD iN The UNfOldINg oF the zero-EiGeNvaluE at $k=0$ FOR THe faMilY $L(k)$. WE therEfore view $L(k)$ as An aNalyTIc oPeratOr penCil aNd DefinE the *spAtial MuLtiplicity* as the MultIplicity oF $k=0$ aS aN eiGeNvaluE Of the oPerAtoR pencil. since suCH coNsTRUCtIons are possibly not WiDELy Known, and The use HErE iS Less stanDaRd, wE incLUDe the ReleVAnT construCtions.

rEcAlL that, acCoRding tO HYpoTheSis \[h:3.2\], tHE kerNel of $L(0)$ Is one-dimEnsioNAl.

\[c:eigenexp\] TheRE exists $m>0$, maximAL, aND $E(k)=\SUm_{j=0}^{m}E_jk^J$ such that $$\laBel{e:le2}
L(k)e(K)=\lamBDa_Mk^mE_0^*+{\MathrM{O}}(k^{m+1}),$$ oR, eQUiVAlently, $$\sum_{j=0}^k L_je_{k-j}=0,\quAd K=0,\ldots,M-1; \qquaD   \lambda_m:=\left\lAngle \sum_{j=0}^{m-1} l_{M-J}E_j,e_0^*\right\RangLE\nEQ  0
}}$, $L(k)$ is Fredholm of  index $0$  forall  $k \i n{\m athb b{R}}$ and the setof $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$where  $ L (k)$ is  notinverti b le i s d is cr ete .We  areint erested  in the ca sewh ere $\mathca l {L }$ is notinv ertible.

\[ h:3 .2\] T he ree xists  auniqu e $k_* $  and a  unique ( up to sca l ar mult i p le s) $ e_0\neq 0$ such t h at $L(k_*)e_0=0$.  We th en sc a l e $ \la ngle e_0,e_ 0 \ra n gle=1$. 
I n p art i cular, $\lamb da=0$ belon g s t o thees sen t ial sp ectru mo f $ \mathcal{L} $. W e can ass ume wi t hout lo s s of ge nerali tytha t $k _ *= 0$ , p os s ibl y  c onj u gat ing $\ma th ca l{L}$  wit h t h e mu lti plic ation  operator ${\ mat hrm{ e }}^ {{\ma thrm{ i}}k _*  x}$.  We wr ite $ e_ 0^*$ for the ke rnel  of the a djo in t $ L^ *(0)$ with $ \la ngl e e_0^* , e_0^* \ ran gl e = 1 $. 

#### Spatial mul ti p l ic ities in  the e s se nt i al spect ru m.
Wea r e int eres t ed  in theunfold i ng  o f the z er o-eige nv alu e a t $k= 0 $ fo r thefamily $ L(k)$ .  We thereforev iew $L(k)$ as an a na l ytic  op erator penc il a n d de fine th e * s patia l mul ti p li c ity* as the multipl ic ity of  $k=0 $ as an eigen value of t h e operator  pen c il .  Since such co nstru ctions are possibly  notwidely k nown, and t he use h ere  is  le sss t an dard, we incl u d e th erelevan t c onstruc tio ns. 

R eca ll  that, ac cordingto  H yp ot hes is \[ h :3.2\],th e k er nel  of $ L (0)$ i s one -dim en si o nal .

\[c: e ig e n exp\ ]Th ereexi st s $m> 0$,m axi mal, an d $e(k)=\ sum _ {j=0 }^ {m }e_jk^j $ such that $ $\ label{e:LE 2} 
L( k)e(k) = \ lambda_m k^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k ^ {m+1}), $$or, e quiv alently,$$\ sum_{j =0} ^ k L_je _{k-j} =0,\q ua d k = 0 ,\ldo t s ,m -1;  \ qquad   \l a m bda _m:=\ le ft\l angle \ sum_{j=0}^{m-1} L_ { m-j }e_j,e_0^*\ri ght \ran g l e\ neq  0 
}}$, $L(k)$_is Fredholm_of index $0$ for_all $k\in{\mathbb{R}}$_and_the set_of_$k\in{\mathbb{R}}$ where $L(k)$_is not invertible_is discrete.

We are interested_in the case_where_$\mathcal{L}$ is not invertible.

\[h:3.2\] There exists a unique $k_*$ and a unique (up to_scalar_multiples) $e_0\neq_0$_such_that $L(k_*)e_0=0$. We then scale_$\langle e_0, e_0 \rangle=1$.

In particular,_$\lambda=0$ belongs_to the essential spectrum of $\mathcal{L}$. We can_assume_without loss of_generality that $k_*=0$, possibly conjugating $\mathcal{L}$ with the multiplication_operator ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}k_* x}$. We write $e_0^*$_for the kernel_of_the_adjoint $L^*(0)$ with $\langle_e_0^*, e_0^*\rangle=1$.

#### Spatial multiplicities in the_essential spectrum.

We are interested in the_unfolding of the zero-eigenvalue at $k=0$ for_the family $L(k)$. We therefore view_$L(k)$ as an analytic operator_pencil and_define the *spatial multiplicity* as_the multiplicity of_$k=0$ as_an eigenvalue of_the operator pencil. Since such constructions_are possibly not_widely known, and the use here_is_less standard, we_include_the_relevant constructions.

Recall_that, according to_Hypothesis_\[h:3.2\], the_kernel_of $L(0)$ is one-dimensional.

\[c:eigenexp\] There exists_$m>0$,_maximal, and $e(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}e_jk^j$ such that $$\label{e:LE2}
L(k)e(k)=\lambda_mk^me_0^*+{\mathrm{O}}(k^{m+1}),$$ or,_equivalently, $$\sum_{j=0}^k L_je_{k-j}=0,\quad k=0,\ldots,m-1;_\qquad_  \lambda_m:=\left\langle \sum_{j=0}^{m-1}_L_{m-j}e_j,e_0^*\right\rangle\neq  0