tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\
=\left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\b(\tau) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\tau)-A_{IJ,\de\e}^\b(\tau)
A_{ij,\s\e}^\b(\tau)\right)\tt\de\b(2\tau).
\end{matrix}$$

The identity is straightforward if we substitute the definition of $A$’s in terms of $\t$’s and their derivatives. Indeed $$\label{minors}
A_{ij,\e\de}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\b-A_{IJ,\e\de}^\b A_{ij,\s\de}^\b=
\tt\de\b\det\pmatrix
\tt\e\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\e\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\e\b\\
\tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\de\b\\
\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\s\b
\endpmatrix$$ evaluated at $2\tau$. Another proof would be to use the previous proposition for $\e,\de,\s$ with $i,j$ and then with $I,J$ to express $\tt\s\b$ in two different ways, and then equate these two expressions.

Let us consider the case $\b=0$ for the propositions above. Then the $A_{ij,\e\de}^{0}$ are $2\times 2$ minors of the $2^g\times
\left(\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1\right)$ matrix $M$ with columns $(\T[\e],\lbrace\p_{\tau_{ij}}\T[\e]\rbrace_{ i\le j})_{\rm all\
i,j}$ (i.e. in each column there are the values either of $\T[\e]$ or of its derivative, for all $\e\in\Z_2^g$). This has maximal rank, equal to $\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1$, for irreducible abelian varieties — see [@sasaki] and [@sm1]. Induct
tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\ 
 = \left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\b(\tau) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\tau)-A_{IJ,\de\e}^\b(\tau) 
 A_{ij,\s\e}^\b(\tau)\right)\tt\de\b(2\tau). 
 \end{matrix}$$ 

 The identity is straightforward if we substitute the definition of $ A$ ’s in terms of $ \t$ ’s and their derivatives. Indeed $ $ \label{minors } 
 A_{ij,\e\de}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\b - A_{IJ,\e\de}^\b A_{ij,\s\de}^\b= 
 \tt\de\b\det\pmatrix 
 \tt\e\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\e\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\e\b\\ 
 \tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\de\b\\ 
 \tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\s\b 
 \endpmatrix$$ evaluated at $ 2\tau$. Another validation would be to practice the former proposition for $ \e,\de,\s$ with $ i, j$ and then with $ I, J$ to express $ \tt\s\b$ in two different means, and then equate these two expressions. 

 permit us consider the case $ \b=0 $ for the proposition above. Then the $ A_{ij,\e\de}^{0}$ are $ 2\times 2 $ minors of the $ 2^g\times 
 \left(\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1\right)$ matrix $ M$ with columns $ (\T[\e],\lbrace\p_{\tau_{ij}}\T[\e]\rbrace _ { i\le j})_{\rm all\ 
 i, j}$ (i.e. in each column there be the values either of $ \T[\e]$ or of its derivative, for all $ \e\in\Z_2^g$). This take maximal rank, equal to $ \frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1 $, for irreducible abelian varieties — see [ @sasaki ] and [ @sm1 ]. Induct
tau)\gight)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\
=\left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\b(\txu) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\tau)-A_{IJ,\bw\e}^\b(\tau)
E_{ij,\s\e}^\b(\tzu)\right)\tg\de\b(2\tau).
\end{matrix}$$

The identity iw strqightforward if we subrtitute tje definutioi of $A$’s in terms of $\t$’s akb thejv dernvetives. Indeed $$\lsbel{minors}
D_{ij,\e\de}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\t-A_{KJ,\z\de}^\b A_{ij,\s\de}^\b=
\tt\de\b\det\pmatrix
\tt\e\b & \p_{\tat_{ij}}\tt\e\b & \o_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\e\b\\
\tt\de\f & \p_{\uau_{yj}}\tt\sv\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\de\b\\
\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IO}}\tt\s\b
\endpmatrix$$ evaluated at $2\tau$. Another oroov would be to use hhe previouw prjposition for $\e,\de,\s$ with $i,j$ and then with $I,J$ to express $\tt\s\b$ in two diffzrent ways, qne tjgn equate thxse twj expressions.

Let us wonsidet the case $\b=0$ fpr vhe propositions above. Thxn the $A_{ij,\e\de}^{0}$ are $2\tiies 2$ minoss of the $2^g\times
\lefr(\feac{g(g+1)}{2}+1\tight)$ matfux $O$ wjti cklumns $(\T[\e],\mbrace\p_{\tau_{jj}}\T[\e]\rbrace_{ u\le j})_{\rm all\
i,j}$ (i.e. in ewbn column thede are tre values either of $\T[\e]$ or of its derivauive, ror all $\e\in\Z_2^g$). This has naximal rank, equal to $\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1$, fjr irreducible abelian varieties — see [@sasaki] and [@vm1]. Invuzt
tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\ =\left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\b(\tau) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\tau)-A_{IJ,\de\e}^\b(\tau) A_{ij,\s\e}^\b(\tau)\right)\tt\de\b(2\tau). \end{matrix}$$ The identity if substitute the of $A$’s in derivatives. $$\label{minors} A_{ij,\e\de}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\b-A_{IJ,\e\de}^\b \tt\de\b\det\pmatrix \tt\e\b & & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\e\b\\ \tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\de\b & \tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\s\b \endpmatrix$$ evaluated at $2\tau$. Another proof would be use the previous proposition for $\e,\de,\s$ with $i,j$ and then with $I,J$ to $\tt\s\b$ two ways, then equate these two expressions. Let us consider the case $\b=0$ for the propositions above. Then $A_{ij,\e\de}^{0}$ are $2\times 2$ minors of the $2^g\times matrix $M$ with columns i\le j})_{\rm all\ i,j}$ (i.e. each there are values of or of its for all $\e\in\Z_2^g$). This has maximal rank, equal to $\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1$, for irreducible abelian varieties — see [@sasaki] [@sm1]. Induct
tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\
=\left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\B(\tau) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\Tau)-A_{Ij,\de\E}^\b(\tAu)
a_{ij,\s\E}^\b(\taU)\right)\tt\de\b(2\tau).
\ENd{maTrix}$$

The identity is straiGhtfoRwARd if WE sUbstiTute the DEfINItiOn Of $a$’s iN tERmS of $\t$’s And Their deRivatives. INdeEd $$\Label{minors}
A_{IJ,\e\De}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\b-a_{IJ,\E\de}^\b A_{ij,\s\de}^\b=
\tT\de\B\det\pmAtRix
\TT\e\b & \p_{\tAu_{iJ}}\tt\e\b & \P_{\tau_{IJ}}\TT\e\b\\
\tt\dE\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tT\dE\B & \p_{\tau_{Ij}}\Tt\de\b\\
\tt\S\B & \P_{\tAu_{ij}}\Tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\s\b
\endPMaTRix$$ evaluated at $2\Tau$. AnoThER pROOf wOulD be to use thE pRevioUS proposITiON FOr $\e,\DE,\s$ with $i,j$ and thEn with $I,J$ to eXPreSs $\tt\s\b$ In Two DIffereNt wayS, aND thEn equate theSe twO expressiOns.

Let US considER the casE $\b=0$ for tHe pRopOsitIOnS aBovE. THEn tHE $A_{Ij,\e\DE}^{0}$ arE $2\times 2$ miNoRs Of the $2^G\timES
\LEFt(\frAc{g(G+1)}{2}+1\rigHt)$ matRix $M$ with columNs $(\T[\E],\lbrACe\p_{\Tau_{ij}}\t[\e]\rbrAce_{ i\Le J})_{\rm alL\
i,j}$ (i.e. iN each CoLumn there are the ValuEs either oF $\T[\e]$ Or Of iTs DerivATive, foR alL $\e\iN\Z_2^g$). This Has maxiMAl rAnK, EQUaL to $\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1$, for irreduCiBLE aBelian vaRietieS — SeE [@sASaki] and [@sM1]. INduCt
tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\ \
=\left(A _{ij, \de \e} ^\ b(\t au)A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b ( \tau )-A_{IJ,\de\e}^\b(\tau )
A_{ ij , \s\e } ^\ b(\ta u)\righ t )\ t t \de \b (2 \ta u) . 
\ end{m atr ix}$$
The identi tyis  straightfor w ar d if we su bst itute the de fin itionof  $A $ ’s in  te rms o f $\t$ ’ s andtheir der iv a tives. Indeed$ $ \l abel {minors}
A_{ij,\e \ de } ^\b A_{IJ,\s\d e}^\b- A_ { IJ , \ e\d e}^ \b A_{ij,\ s\ de}^\ b =
\tt\d e \b \ d e t\p m atrix
\tt\e\b  & \p_{\tau _ {ij }}\tt\ e\ b & \p_{\t au_{I J} } \tt \e\b\\
\tt\ de\b  & \p_{\t au_{ij } }\tt\de \ b & \p_ {\tau_ {IJ }}\ tt\d e \b \\ 
\t t\ s \b&  \ p_{ \ tau _{ij}}\t t\ s\ b & \ p_{\ t a u _ {IJ} }\t t\s\ b
\en dpmatrix$$ ev alu ated at$2\ta u$. A noth er  proo f woul d beto  use the previo us p ropositio n f or  $\ e, \de,\ s $ with  $i ,j$  and th en with $I, J$ t o  e xpress $\tt\s\b$ i nt w odifferen t ways ,  a nd then equ at e t hese t wo ex pres s io ns.

Let  us co n si de r the c as e $\b= 0$  fo r t he pr o posi tionsabove. T hen t h e $A_{ij,\e\de } ^{0}$ are $2\ t im e s  2 $  min ors  of the $2^ g\ti m es
\ left ( \f rac { g(g+1 )}{2} +1 \ ri g ht)$ matrix $M$ wit hcolumn s $(\ T[\e],\lbrace \p_{\tau_{ i j } }\T[\e]\ rbra c e_ {  i\le j})_{\rm  all\ 
i,j}$ (i. e . in eac h col umn ther e are the v alues ei the r o f $ \T[ \ e ]$  or of its de r i vati ve , for a ll$\e\in\ Z_2 ^g$ ).Thi shas maxim al rank,  e qu al  t o $ \frac { g(g+1)}{ 2} +1$ ,for  irre d ucible  abel ianva ri e tie s — see [@ s a saki ]an d [@ sm1 ].  Indu ct
tau)\right)\tt\e\b(2\tau)\\
=\left(A_{ij,\de\e}^\b(\tau) A_{IJ,\s\e}^\b(\tau)-A_{IJ,\de\e}^\b(\tau)
A_{ij,\s\e}^\b(\tau)\right)\tt\de\b(2\tau).
\end{matrix}$$

The_identity is_straightforward if we substitute_the definition_of_$A$’s in_terms_of $\t$’s and_their derivatives. Indeed_$$\label{minors}
A_{ij,\e\de}^\b A_{IJ,\s\de}^\b-A_{IJ,\e\de}^\b A_{ij,\s\de}^\b=
\tt\de\b\det\pmatrix
\tt\e\b &_\p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\e\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\e\b\\
\tt\de\b_&_\p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\de\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\de\b\\
\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{ij}}\tt\s\b & \p_{\tau_{IJ}}\tt\s\b
\endpmatrix$$ evaluated at $2\tau$. Another proof would be_to_use the_previous_proposition_for $\e,\de,\s$ with $i,j$ and_then with $I,J$ to express_$\tt\s\b$ in_two different ways, and then equate these two_expressions.

Let_us consider the_case $\b=0$ for the propositions above. Then the $A_{ij,\e\de}^{0}$_are $2\times 2$ minors of the_$2^g\times
\left(\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1\right)$ matrix $M$_with_columns_$(\T[\e],\lbrace\p_{\tau_{ij}}\T[\e]\rbrace_{ i\le j})_{\rm all\
i,j}$_(i.e. in each column there are_the values either of $\T[\e]$ or_of its derivative, for all $\e\in\Z_2^g$). This_has maximal rank, equal to $\frac{g(g+1)}{2}+1$,_for irreducible abelian varieties —_see [@sasaki]_and [@sm1]. Induct