 for other galaxies. @wu05 derived a calibration for SFR as a function of 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar luminosity $\nu L_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]$ (hereafter $L_8$) using correlations between $L_8$ and $L({\rm H}\alpha)$ and $L(1.4 {\rm GHz})$. The IRAC 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar flux density measured for M31 corresponds to a luminosity of $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})={8.8}$. The @wu05 calibration yields an SFR of $0.4 M_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$.

It is possible to compare M31’s 8[ $\mu$m]{}-derived SFR with SFRs from other indicators, but since all such indicators have calibration uncertainties \[e.g., the @wu05 8[ $\mu$m]{}/SFR calibration is based on a small number of galaxies with a limited range of properties\], we instead compare the observed properties directly. To estimate the $H\alpha$ luminosity of M31, we convert the value given by @dev94 to the 780 kpc distance, multiply by 0.8 to account for \[NII\] contamination, and multiply by 3.4 [as done by @wb94] to correct for extinction. The resulting $L({\rm H}\alpha)=2.6\times 10^7 L_{\sun}$, which predicts $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=9.1$. The 1.4 GHz radio flux density measured by @bbh98, $3.34\times 10^{20}$ W Hz$^{-1}$, yields a predicted $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=8.4$. Figure 12 of @dale05 gives the ratio of $\nu f_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]/f(3-1100\mu{\rm m})$ as a function of $f_{\nu}(70 \mu{\rm m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm m})$ for SINGS galaxies. From @gordon06, M31 has $f(70)/f(160)=0.12$, with the corresponding $f(3-1100\mu {\rm m})=2.57\times10^{-10}$ W m$^{-2}$, yielding a predicted $\log(L_8
for other galaxies. @wu05 derived a calibration for SFR as a function of 8 [   $ \mu$m   ] { } non - leading luminosity $ \nu L_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]$ (hereafter $ L_8 $) use correlations between $ L_8 $ and $ L({\rm H}\alpha)$ and $ L(1.4 { \rm GHz})$. The IRAC 8 [   $ \mu$m   ] { } non - stellar magnetic field concentration measured for M31 corresponds to a luminosity of $ \log(L_8 / L_{\sun})={8.8}$. The @wu05 calibration yields an SFR of $ 0.4 M_{\sun}$   yr$^{-1}$. 

 It is possible to compare M31 ’s 8 [   $ \mu$m]{}-derived SFR with SFRs from early indicator, but since all such indicators suffer calibration uncertainties \[e.g. , the @wu05 8 [   $ \mu$m]{}/SFR calibration is based on a little number of galaxies with a circumscribed range of properties\ ], we instead compare the observed properties directly. To estimate the $ H\alpha$ luminosity of M31, we convert the value contribute by @dev94 to the 780   kpc distance, multiply by 0.8 to account for \[NII\ ] contamination, and multiply by 3.4 [ as done by @wb94 ] to discipline for extinction. The resulting $ L({\rm H}\alpha)=2.6\times 10 ^ 7 L_{\sun}$, which predicts $ \log(L_8 / L_{\sun})=9.1$. The 1.4   GHz radio magnetic field density measured by @bbh98, $ 3.34\times 10^{20}$   W   Hz$^{-1}$, yields a predicted $ \log(L_8 / L_{\sun})=8.4$. Figure   12 of @dale05 gives the proportion of $ \nu f_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]/f(3 - 1100\mu{\rm m})$ as a function of $ f_{\nu}(70 \mu{\rm m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm m})$ for SINGS galaxies. From @gordon06, M31 has $ f(70)/f(160)=0.12 $, with the corresponding $ f(3 - 1100\mu { \rm m})=2.57\times10^{-10}$   W   m$^{-2}$, yielding a predicted $ \log(L_8
 fog other galaxies. @wu05 deriyed a calibratiou for SHR as a functiov of 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar luminositb $\nu L_{\nu}[8\my{\rm m(dust)}]$ (hereafter $L_8$) jsing corgelations betxeen $L_8$ and $L({\rm H}\empha)$ and $L(1.4 {\rm NHz})$. Tke IRAC 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stgllar flux dansity measureg wox M31 corresponds to a luminosity of $\ljg(L_8/L_{\sun})={8.8}$. Tje @wu05 calibratyon jiqlds an SFR of $0.4 M_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$.

It is possible tk compage M31’s 8[ $\mu$m]{}-derived XFR with SFRs from other ijdicwtors, but since alp such indixatoww have calibfation unctrcainties \[e.g., the @wu05 8[ $\mu$m]{}/SFR calibration is bxsed pn a small nymbft of galaxiew witr a limited vsnge ox propetties\], we instesd rompqre the observed propxrties directly. To eftimate tve $H\alpha$ luminositt if M31, fe cmnvefr tfe bakus givej bb @dev94 to ths 780 kpc distabce, multiply by 0.8 to asbpunt for \[NII\] contaiigation, and multiply by 3.4 [as done by @wb94] tm ckrrect for extinction. Tye resulting $L({\rm H}\alpja)=2.6\times 10^7 J_{\sun}$, which predicts $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=9.1$. The 1.4 GHz radio flux dansitb oeawuved ct @hbh98, $3.34\times 10^{20}$ W Hz$^{-1}$, yields a predicted $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=8.4$. Figtde 12 on @dale05 gives the ratio of $\ni v_{\ni}[8\iu{\rm m(dust)}]/f(3-1100\mu{\tm m})$ as a runction of $f_{\nu}(70 \mu{\gm m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm m})$ for SIGGS balaxies. From @gordon06, M31 has $d(70)/f(160)=0.12$, with the borrwsponding $f(3-1100\mu {\rm m})=2.57\cimes10^{-10}$ W m$^{-2}$, yielbing a predocted $\log(L_8
for other galaxies. @wu05 derived a calibration as function of $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar luminosity using between $L_8$ and H}\alpha)$ and $L(1.4 GHz})$. The IRAC 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar density measured for M31 corresponds to a luminosity of $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})={8.8}$. The @wu05 calibration an SFR of $0.4 M_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$. It is possible to compare M31’s 8[ SFR SFRs other but since all such indicators have calibration uncertainties \[e.g., the @wu05 8[ $\mu$m]{}/SFR calibration is based a small number of galaxies with a limited of properties\], we instead the observed properties directly. To the luminosity of we the given by @dev94 the 780 kpc distance, multiply by 0.8 to account for \[NII\] contamination, and multiply by 3.4 [as by @wb94] for extinction. resulting H}\alpha)=2.6\times L_{\sun}$, which predicts 1.4 GHz radio flux density measured 10^{20}$ W Hz$^{-1}$, yields a predicted $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=8.4$. Figure of @dale05 the ratio of $\nu f_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]/f(3-1100\mu{\rm as a function of $f_{\nu}(70 \mu{\rm m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm for SINGS galaxies. From @gordon06, M31 has $f(70)/f(160)=0.12$, with the corresponding $f(3-1100\mu {\rm m})=2.57\times10^{-10}$ W a predicted $\log(L_8
 for other galaxies. @wu05 derived A calibratiOn for sFR As a FuNctiOn of 8[ $\Mu$m ]{}non-stellar lUMinoSity $\nu L_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]$ (hereAfter $l_8$) uSIng cORrElatiOns betwEEn $l_8$ ANd $L({\Rm h}\aLphA)$ aND $L(1.4 {\Rm GHz})$. the iRAC 8[ $\mu$m ]{}Non-stellar FluX dEnsity measurED fOr M31 correspOndS to a luminosiTy oF $\log(L_8/L_{\SuN})={8.8}$. ThE @Wu05 calIbrAtion Yields AN SFR of $0.4 m_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$.

It iS pOSsible TO comparE m31’S 8[ $\mU$m]{}-deRived SFR with SFRs fROm OTher indicators, But sinCe ALl SUCh iNdiCators have CaLibraTIon unceRTaINTIes \[E.G., the @wu05 8[ $\mu$m]{}/SFR cAlibration iS BasEd on a sMaLl nUMber of GalaxIeS WitH a limited raNge oF propertiEs\], we inSTead comPAre the oBserveD prOpeRtieS DiReCtlY. TO EstIMaTe tHE $H\aLpha$ lumiNoSiTy of M31, We coNVERT the ValUe giVen by @Dev94 to the 780 kpc diStaNce, mULtiPly by 0.8 To accOunt FoR \[NII\] cOntamiNatioN, aNd multiply by 3.4 [as dOne bY @wb94] to corrEct FoR exTiNctioN. the resUltIng $l({\rm H}\alpHa)=2.6\times 10^7 l_{\Sun}$, WhICH PrEdicts $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=9.1$. The 1.4 Ghz RADiO flux denSity meASuReD By @bbh98, $3.34\timEs 10^{20}$ w Hz$^{-1}$, YielDS A predIcteD $\LoG(L_8/L_{\sun})=8.4$. FiGure 12 of @DAlE05 gIves the RaTio of $\nU f_{\Nu}[8\mU{\rm M(dust)}]/F(3-1100\Mu{\rm M})$ as a fuNction of $F_{\nu}(70 \mu{\RM m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm m})$ for SinGS galaxies. FrOM @gORDoN06, m31 has $F(70)/f(160)=0.12$, wIth the correSponDIng $f(3-1100\Mu {\rm M})=2.57\TiMes10^{-10}$ w M$^{-2}$, yielDing a PrEDiCTed $\log(L_8
 for other galaxies. @wu05  derived a  cali bra tio nforSFRas a functiono f 8[  $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar  lumi no s ity$ \n u L_{ \nu}[8\ m u{ \ r m m (d us t)} ]$ (h ereaf ter  $L_8$)  using cor rel at ions between $L _8$ and $L ({\ rm H}\alpha) $ a nd $L( 1. 4 { \ rm GH z}) $. Th e IRAC 8[ $\m u$m ]{}no n- s tellar flux de n s it y me asured for M31 co r re s ponds to a lum inosit yo f$ \ log (L_ 8/L_{\sun} )= {8.8} $ . The @ w u0 5 c ali b ration yields  an SFR of$ 0.4  M_{\s un }$y r$^{-1 }$.
It ispossible to  com pare M31’ s 8[ $ \ mu$m]{} - derived  SFR w ith  SF Rs f r om  o the ri ndi c at ors ,  bu t sinceal lsuchindi c a t o rs h ave  cal ibrat ion uncertain tie s \[ e .g. , the  @wu0 5 8[  $ \mu$m ]{}/SF R cal ib ration is based  ona small n umb er  of  g alaxi e s with  alim ited ra nge ofp rop er t i e s\ ], we instead comp ar e th e observ ed pro p er ti e s direct ly . T o es t i matethe$ H\ alpha$ l uminos i ty  o f M31,we  conve rt  th e v alueg iven  by @d ev94 tothe 7 8 0 kpc distance ,  multiply by0 .8 t oa ccou ntfor \[NII\]  con t amin atio n ,and multi ply b y3 .4 [as done by @wb94]to  corre ct fo r extinction.  The resul t i n g $L({\r m H} \ al p ha)=2.6\times10^7L_{\sun}$, which pr edict s $\log( L_8/L_{\s u n })=9.1$.  Th e 1 .4GHz r ad io flux densi t y  mea su red by@bb h98, $3 .34 \ti mes  10 ^{ 20}$ W Hz $^{-1}$,  y ie ld sa p redic t ed $\log (L _8/ L_ {\s un})= 8 .4$. F igure  12of  @ d ale 05 give s  t h e  rat io  o f $\ nuf_ {\nu} [8\m u {\r m m(dus t)}]/f(3- 110 0 \mu{ \r mm})$ as  a function o f$f_{\nu}(7 0\mu {\rm m } ) /f_{\nu} (160 \mu{\rm m})$ for S I NGS gal axi es. F rom@gordon06 , M 31 has  $f ( 70)/f( 160)=0 .12$,  w ith t he co r r es pon di ng $f(3-11 0 0 \mu  {\rm  m })=2 .57\tim es10^{-10}$ W m$^{ - 2}$ , yielding apre dict e d  $ \lo g (L _ 8
 for_other galaxies._@wu05 derived a calibration_for SFR_as_a function_of_8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar luminosity $\nu_L_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]$ (hereafter_$L_8$) using correlations between_$L_8$ and $L({\rm_H}\alpha)$_and $L(1.4 {\rm GHz})$. The IRAC 8[ $\mu$m ]{}non-stellar flux density measured for M31 corresponds to_a_luminosity of_$\log(L_8/L_{\sun})={8.8}$._The_@wu05 calibration yields an SFR_of $0.4 M_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$.

It is possible_to compare_M31’s 8[ $\mu$m]{}-derived SFR with SFRs from other indicators,_but_since all such_indicators have calibration uncertainties \[e.g., the @wu05 8[ $\mu$m]{}/SFR calibration_is based on a small number_of galaxies with_a_limited_range of properties\], we_instead compare the observed properties directly._To estimate the $H\alpha$ luminosity of_M31, we convert the value given by_@dev94 to the 780 kpc distance, multiply_by 0.8 to account for_\[NII\] contamination,_and multiply by 3.4 [as_done by @wb94]_to correct_for extinction. The_resulting $L({\rm H}\alpha)=2.6\times 10^7 L_{\sun}$, which_predicts $\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=9.1$. The_1.4 GHz radio flux density measured by_@bbh98,_$3.34\times 10^{20}$ W Hz$^{-1}$, yields_a_predicted_$\log(L_8/L_{\sun})=8.4$. Figure 12_of @dale05 gives_the_ratio of_$\nu_f_{\nu}[8\mu{\rm m(dust)}]/f(3-1100\mu{\rm m})$ as a function_of_$f_{\nu}(70 \mu{\rm m})/f_{\nu}(160 \mu{\rm m})$ for SINGS_galaxies. From @gordon06, M31_has_$f(70)/f(160)=0.12$, with the corresponding_$f(3-1100\mu {\rm m})=2.57\times10^{-10}$ W m$^{-2}$, yielding a_predicted $\log(L_8