2010). The variable absorbers detected in those observations have column densities typically $N_{\rm H} \sim 1-5 \times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and can be partial covering, as for Mkn 766. They are inferred to exist $\sim10^{2.5} - 10^4 R_{\rm g}$ from the black hole, and are frequently identified as BLR clouds.

We return to a point regarding the type Is from $\S$4.3, regarding eclipse events longer than $\sim100$ d in duration. Our selection function analysis shows that if such events occurred in type Is with the same frequency as in type IIs, we should have detected them. It is thus possible that type Is are devoid of clouds at these radial distances along the line of sight. Another possibility is that these clouds do exist at these radii in type Is, but intersect our line of sight so rarely \[probabilities $<$ 1/(10–300)\] that 16 years of monitoring 37 type I AGN was insufficient to catch even one event (excluding the possibility that the event in MR 2251–178 falls into this category). In either case, we can estimate the corresponding radial distances. We assume a black hole mass of 10$^{7.7} {\ensuremath{\rm M_\odot}\xspace}$, $N_{\rm H} = 12 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, and log($L_{\rm ion}$) = 44.3, the non-weighted average of the type Is with secure events. Arbitrarily-chosen durations of 100, 316, 1000, and 3162 d correspond to inferred radial distances of 14, 23, 36, and 57 $\times 10^4$ $R_{\rm g}$.

Finally, we investigate any possible trend between the best-fitting values of peak $N_{\rm H}$ and the inferred values of $r_{\rm cl}$ listed in Table \[tab:ecl1dist\], in units of either light-days, $R_{\rm g}$, or $r_{\rm cl}$/$R_{\rm d}$ (Fig. \[fig:NHvsrad\]). Given the small number of eclipse events, and given that values of $N_{\rm H}$ span only a factor of $\sim$7, we find no robust correlations; inclusion/exclusion of only 1–2 secure or candidate points significantly changes the resulting coefficients and null hypothesis probabilities. Note
2010). The variable absorbers detected in those observations get column density typically $ N_{\rm H } \sim 1 - 5 \times 10^{23}$   cm$^{-2}$ and can be partial covering, as for Mkn   766. They are inferred to exist $ \sim10^{2.5 } - 10 ^ 4 R_{\rm g}$ from the bootleg hole, and are frequently identified as BLR clouds. 

 We come back to a point regarding the character Is from $ \S$4.3, involve eclipse events longer than $ \sim100 $   five hundred in duration. Our selection function psychoanalysis shows that if such events occurred in type Is with the same frequency as in type IIs, we should have detect them. It is thus possible that type Is are barren of clouds at these radial distances along the line of sight. Another possibility is that these cloud do exist at these radii in type Is, but intersect our line of sight so rarely \[probabilities $ < $ 1/(10–300)\ ] that 16 class of monitoring 37 type I AGN was insufficient to catch even one event (excluding the possibility that the event in MR   2251–178 falls into this category). In either case, we can estimate the corresponding radial distances. We assume a black hole mass of 10$^{7.7 } { \ensuremath{\rm M_\odot}\xspace}$, $ N_{\rm H } = 12 \times 10^{22}$   cm$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, and log($L_{\rm ion}$) = 44.3, the non - leaden average of the character Is with secure events. Arbitrarily - choose durations of 100, 316, 1000, and 3162 d correspond to inferred radial distance of 14, 23, 36, and 57 $ \times 10 ^ 4 $ $ R_{\rm g}$. 

 ultimately, we investigate any possible trend between the well - fitting values of peak $ N_{\rm H}$ and the inferred values of $ r_{\rm cl}$ listed in Table   \[tab: ecl1dist\ ], in whole of either light - days, $ R_{\rm g}$, or $ r_{\rm cl}$/$R_{\rm d}$ (Fig.   \[fig: NHvsrad\ ]). Given the small numeral of eclipse events, and establish that values of $ N_{\rm H}$ span only a factor of $ \sim$7, we find no full-bodied correlations; inclusion / exclusion of only 1–2 secure or candidate points significantly changes the leave coefficients and null hypothesis probability. Note
2010). Thf variable absorbers dettcted in those observatimns habe columv densities typically $N_{\rm H} \din 1-5 \tines 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and can be partkal coverpng, as foe Mki 766. They are infercsd to ewnst $\sjl10^{2.5} - 10^4 X_{\rn g}$ from the bkack hole, dnd are frequettuy identified as BLR clouds.

We return eo a poonh regarding thg typt If frkm $\S$4.3, regarding eclipse events longsr than $\sim100$ d in durayion. Our selection functioj anwlysis shows that lf such evebts jxcurred in thpe Is with the same ftequency as in type IIs, we shoula havz detected jkwm. Lj is thus powsiblv that type Is are deeoid of clouds at thexe cadiql distances along thx line of sight. Anotrer possitimity is that thesw xloudv do exirr ag tgexe radii in type Is, bht intersecr our line of sight sj rarely \[probagilitiqs $<$ 1/(10–300)\] that 16 years of monitoring 37 type I AGT wzs insufficient to catcy even one event (excloding the [ossibility that the event in MR 2251–178 falls into this wategkfy). Nk dutjer case, we can estimate the corresponding raqjak cistances. We afsume a blavk hpje mass of 10$^{7.7} {\evsuremcfh{\dm M_\odot}\xspace}$, $N_{\rm H} = 12 \tiies 10^{22}$ cn$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, agd lpg($L_{\rm ion}$) = 44.3, the non-weighted average of nhe rype Is with securz events. Arbntrariky-choxen durations of 100, 316, 1000, and 3162 d dorrespond ho inferrsa radial distancds pf 14, 23, 36, and 57 $\times 10^4$ $R_{\rm g}$.

Finaljy, we invxstigcte any oossoble twend betwefn thc best-fitting valued of keak $N_{\sm H}$ and tje inferred values of $r_{\rm cl}$ listed in Table \[tsb:acl1gist\], in bnits pf either ligrt-days, $R_{\rm g}$, ot $r_{\rm cl}$/$R_{\xm d}$ (Fkg. \[fig:NHvsrzd\]). Givei the small gumber of eclhkse events, anv given trat caluws of $N_{\fo H}$ span only s factor of $\sim$7, we dind no robust corvelatkkns; inclusion/exeuowion of only 1–2 xecjre og cendidwde points sicnifkcavyly cfanges uke vesjltimg coefficients and tull hypothesis probabollties. Notg
2010). The variable absorbers detected in those column typically $N_{\rm \sim 1-5 \times partial as for Mkn They are inferred exist $\sim10^{2.5} - 10^4 R_{\rm g}$ the black hole, and are frequently identified as BLR clouds. We return to point regarding the type Is from $\S$4.3, regarding eclipse events longer than $\sim100$ in Our function shows that if such events occurred in type Is with the same frequency as in type we should have detected them. It is thus that type Is are of clouds at these radial along line of Another is these clouds do at these radii in type Is, but intersect our line of sight so rarely \[probabilities $<$ 1/(10–300)\] 16 years 37 type AGN insufficient catch even one the possibility that the event in into this category). In either case, we can the corresponding distances. We assume a black hole of 10$^{7.7} {\ensuremath{\rm M_\odot}\xspace}$, $N_{\rm H} = 12 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, and log($L_{\rm ion}$) = 44.3, the non-weighted average of the type Is events. Arbitrarily-chosen durations of 316, 1000, and d to radial of 14, 36, and 57 $\times 10^4$ $R_{\rm g}$. Finally, we investigate any trend between the best-fitting values of peak $N_{\rm H}$ and values $r_{\rm cl}$ listed Table \[tab:ecl1dist\], in units either $R_{\rm g}$, or $r_{\rm (Fig. Given of events, given that values of H}$ span only a factor $\sim$7, we find no 1–2 secure or candidate points significantly changes the coefficients and null hypothesis probabilities. Note
2010). The variable absorbers detecTed in those ObserVatIonS hAve cOlumN densities typiCAlly $n_{\rm H} \sim 1-5 \times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and can be PartiAl COverINg, As for mkn 766. They ARe INFerReD tO exIsT $\SiM10^{2.5} - 10^4 R_{\rm g}$ FroM the blaCk hole, and aRe fReQuently identIFiEd as BLR cloUds.

we return to a pOinT regarDiNg tHE type is fRom $\S$4.3, rEgardiNG eclipSe events lOnGEr than $\SIm100$ d in duRATiOn. OuR selection functioN AnALysis shows that If such EvENtS OCcuRreD in type Is wItH the sAMe frequENcY AS In tYPe IIs, we should Have detecteD TheM. It is tHuS poSSible tHat tyPe iS arE devoid of clOuds At these raDial diSTances aLOng the lIne of sIghT. AnOtheR PoSsIbiLiTY is THaT thESe cLouds do eXiSt At theSe raDII IN typE Is, But iNtersEct our line of sIghT so rARelY \[probAbiliTies $<$ 1/(10–300)\] ThAt 16 yeaRs of moNitorInG 37 type I AGN was insUffiCient to caTch EvEn oNe Event (EXcludiNg tHe pOssibilIty that THe eVeNT IN Mr 2251–178 falls into this cateGoRY). in Either caSe, we caN EsTiMAte the coRrEspOndiNG RadiaL disTAnCes. We assUme a blACk HoLe mass oF 10$^{7.7} {\eNsuremAtH{\rm m_\odOt}\xspACe}$, $N_{\rM H} = 12 \timeS 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, And loG($l_{\rm ion}$) = 44.3, the non-weIGhted average oF ThE TYpE is wiTh sEcure events. arbiTRariLy-chOSeN duRAtionS of 100, 316, 1000, anD 3162 d COrREspond to inferred radIaL distaNces oF 14, 23, 36, and 57 $\times 10^4$ $R_{\rm g}$.

finally, we iNVEStigate aNy poSSiBLe trend between The beSt-fitting vALues of peAk $N_{\rm h}$ and the iNferred vaLUEs of $r_{\rm cL}$ liSteD in tabLE \[TaB:ecl1dist\], in uniTS Of eiThEr light-DayS, $R_{\rm g}$, or $R_{\rm Cl}$/$R_{\Rm d}$ (fig. \[FiG:NHvsrad\]). GIven the sMaLl NuMbEr oF ecliPSe events, AnD giVeN thAt valUEs of $N_{\rM H}$ spaN onlY a FaCTor Of $\sim$7, we FInD NO robUsT cOrreLatIoNs; incLusiON/exClusion Of only 1–2 secUre OR canDiDaTe pointS significantlY cHanges the rEsUltIng coeFFIcients aNd null hypothesis probabiLIties. NoTe
2010). The variable absorb ers detect ed in  th ose  o bser vati ons have colum n  den sities typically $N_{\ rm H}  \ s im 1 - 5\time s 10^{2 3 }$ c m$^ {- 2} $ a nd ca n bepar tial co vering, as  fo rMkn 766. The y  a re inferre d t o exist $\si m10 ^{2.5}  -  10 ^ 4 R_{ \rm  g}$from t h e blac k hole, a nd are fr e quently i de ntif ied as BLR clouds . 
W e return to apointre g ar d i ngthe  type Is f ro m $\S $ 4.3, re g ar d i n g e c lipse eventslonger than $\s im100$  d  in durati on. O ur sel ection func tion  analysis  shows that if such ev ents o ccu rre d in ty pe  Is  w i tht he  sa m e f requency  a sin ty pe I I s , we s hou ld h ave d etected them.  It  ist hus  poss iblethat  t ype I s aredevoi dof clouds at th eseradial di sta nc esal ong t h e line  of  si ght. An other p o ssi bi l i t yis that these clou ds d oexist at  these ra di i  in type  I s,buti n terse ct o u rline ofsights ora rely \[ pr obabil it ies  $< $ 1/( 1 0–30 0)\] t hat 16 y earso f monitoring 3 7  type I AGN w a si n su f fici ent  to catch e veno ne e vent (e xcl u dingthe p os s ib i lity that the event  i n MR 2 251–1 78 falls into  this cate g o r y). In e ithe r  c a se, we can est imate  the corre s pondingradia l distan ces. We a s s ume a bl ack  ho lemas s of  10$^{7.7} {\ e n sure ma th{\rmM_\ odot}\x spa ce} $,$N_ {\ rm H} = 1 2 \times  1 0^ {2 2} $ c m$^{- 2 }$, log( $\ xi$ )= 0,and l o g($L_{ \rm i on}$ )=4 4.3 , the n o n- w e ight ed  a vera geof  thetype Iswith se cure even ts. Arbi tr ar ily-cho sen durations  o f 100, 316 ,100 0, and 3 162 d co rrespond to inferred ra d ial dis tan ces o f 14 , 23, 36,  an d 57 $ \ti m es 10^ 4$ $R_ {\rmg} $.F inall y ,  w e i nv estigate a n y  po ssibl etren d betwe en the best-fittin g  va lues of peak$N_ {\rm H }$  an d  t h e i nf e rre d values of $r_{\ rm cl}$ li st e din Table \ [ tab :e cl1dist \], inunits of eith er light- days, $R_ {\ rm g } $ , o r $r_{\rmcl}$/$R_ {\rm d}$( Fig.\ [f ig:NH vsr ad\]).  G ive n the  small num ber o f ecli ps e even ts, a nd  given t hat values of $N_{\rm H }$ spa n onl y a  factor o f $ \ sim $7, we fi nd n o robust c orr ela tions ; i n clusi on/e x cl usi o n ofonly 1–2 secur e  o r c a n di date points s i gni fican tly change s th e resulting coeff i cients and nul l hy p o the sis prob ab ilities. Note
2010). The_variable absorbers_detected in those observations_have column_densities_typically $N_{\rm_H}_\sim 1-5 \times_10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and can_be partial covering, as_for Mkn 766. They_are_inferred to exist $\sim10^{2.5} - 10^4 R_{\rm g}$ from the black hole, and are_frequently_identified as_BLR_clouds.

We_return to a point regarding_the type Is from $\S$4.3,_regarding eclipse_events longer than $\sim100$ d in duration. Our selection_function_analysis shows that_if such events occurred in type Is with the_same frequency as in type IIs,_we should have_detected_them._It is thus possible_that type Is are devoid of_clouds at these radial distances along_the line of sight. Another possibility is_that these clouds do exist at_these radii in type Is,_but intersect_our line of sight so_rarely \[probabilities $<$_1/(10–300)\] that_16 years of_monitoring 37 type I AGN was_insufficient to catch_even one event (excluding the possibility_that_the event in_MR 2251–178_falls_into this_category). In either_case,_we can_estimate_the corresponding radial distances. We assume_a_black hole mass of 10$^{7.7} {\ensuremath{\rm M_\odot}\xspace}$,_$N_{\rm H} = 12_\times_10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, log($\xi$)=0, and log($L_{\rm_ion}$) = 44.3, the non-weighted_average of the type Is with_secure events._Arbitrarily-chosen durations_of 100, 316, 1000, and 3162 d correspond to inferred radial_distances of 14, 23, 36, and_57 $\times 10^4$ $R_{\rm_g}$.

Finally, we_investigate_any possible trend_between_the best-fitting_values of peak $N_{\rm H}$ and the_inferred values_of $r_{\rm cl}$ listed in Table \[tab:ecl1dist\],_in units of either_light-days,_$R_{\rm g}$, or $r_{\rm cl}$/$R_{\rm d}$_(Fig. \[fig:NHvsrad\]). Given the small number of_eclipse events, and given that_values_of_$N_{\rm H}$ span only a_factor of $\sim$7, we find no_robust correlations; inclusion/exclusion_of only 1–2 secure or candidate points_significantly_changes the resulting coefficients and null_hypothesis_probabilities. Note