)=|x-y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ where $|x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$ and $y_I^\mu=(r_0^2/|y|^2)
y^\mu$ is the image of $x$ (see comments around Eq. (\[integral\]) and Fig. \[diagram\]). Note that when $y$ is in one of the Milne regions, then $y_I$ is in the other one. Rather than an ‘image charge’, it represents the point where the light cone focuses, (see Fig. \[rays\] (b)). For $x\neq y$ and both finite, $D^{(1)}_{simple}(x,y)$ has singularities in two types of situations. One is when $x$ is on the light cone of $y_I$ (then, $\Delta=0$). The other case arise when the argument of the logarithmic term in Eq. (\[gsimple\]) vanishes. It is convenient to rewrite this term as $$\label{arglog}
-{3\over 8\pi^2 r_0^3}\;
\log\Big|{\left(|x-y_I|+|y_I|\right)^2-|x|^2\over 2|y_I|^2}\Big|
~.$$ The argument vanishes when they are aligned with respect to the origin *and* $|x|^2>|y_I|^2$. This condition defines an ‘image string’ stretching from $y_I$ to infinity. Hence, this singularity occurs only when two points are in different Milne regions. This is consistent with the interpretation of Eq. (\[integral\]), that the Green’s function can be constructed with a mirror image and a linear charge distribution over such a string, see Fig. \[rays\].[^11] These two situations correspond to the coincidence of $x$ with the image of $y$ or its ‘light cone’. Therefore all of them are of UV nature.[^12]

$$\begin{array}{cccc}
  \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6space2.eps}
  &\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6null2.eps}
  &\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6time2
) = |x - y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ where $ |x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$ and $ y_I^\mu=(r_0 ^ 2/|y|^2) 
 y^\mu$ is the image of $ x$ (see comments around Eq.   (\[integral\ ]) and Fig.   \[diagram\ ]). Note that when $ y$ is in one of the Milne region, then $ y_I$ is in the early one. Rather than an ‘ image cathexis ’, it typify the point where the light cone focus, (experience Fig.   \[rays\ ] (b) ). For $ x\neq y$ and both finite, $ D^{(1)}_{simple}(x, y)$ have singularities in two types of site. One is when $ x$ is on the light cone of $ y_I$ (then, $ \Delta=0 $). The other case rebel when the argument of the logarithmic term in Eq.   (\[gsimple\ ]) vanishes. It is convenient to rewrite this term as $ $ \label{arglog } 
 -{3\over 8\pi^2 r_0 ^ 3}\; 
 \log\Big|{\left(|x - y_I|+|y_I|\right)^2-|x|^2\over 2|y_I|^2}\Big| 
 ~.$$ The argument disappear when they are aligned with respect to the origin * and * $ |x|^2>|y_I|^2$. This circumstance defines an ‘ image bowed stringed instrument ’ stretching from $ y_I$ to infinity. therefore, this singularity occurs entirely when two points are in different Milne regions. This is reproducible with the interpretation of Eq.   (\[integral\ ]), that the Green ’s function can be constructed with a mirror image and a linear charge distribution over such a string, see Fig.   \[rays\].[^11 ] These two situations correspond to the coincidence of $ x$ with the image of $ y$ or its ‘ light cone ’. Therefore all of them are of UV nature.[^12 ] 

 $ $ \begin{array}{cccc } 
   \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6space2.eps } 
   & \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6null2.eps } 
   & \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6time2
)=|x-y_I|^2/|j_I|^2~,$$ where $|x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$ and $y_I^\mu=(r_0^2/|y|^2)
y^\mu$ nw the mmage or $x$ (see zomments around Eq. (\[integral\]) aid Fug. \[diatram\]). Note that when $y$ ks in one of the Nilnt regions, then $y_I$ is in tmz othsv one. Cather than an ‘lmage charga’, it representv ghz point where the light cone focuses, (see Fib. \[rwys\] (b)). For $x\neq y$ amq bofh finite, $D^{(1)}_{simple}(x,y)$ has singularitjes in uwo types of situayions. One is when $x$ is on hhe pight cone of $y_I$ (tjen, $\Delta=0$). Tye oeyer case arire when tht crgument of the logarithmic term in Eq. (\[gsimole\]) vcnishes. It us cojeenient to cewritv this term as $$\label{asglog}
-{3\ovrr 8\pi^2 r_0^3}\;
\log\Big|{\lcft(|x-y_M|+|y_I|\rught)^2-|x|^2\over 2|y_I|^2}\Big|
~.$$ The acgument vanishes wheg they ara cligned with respect ro the mrighn *ave* $|x|^2>|h_I|^2$. Uhix donditlon defines ah ‘image strung’ stretching from $y_Y$ to infinity. Gence, ehys singularity occurs only when two poitts are in different Milne regions. This is conslstent wieh the interpretation of Eq. (\[integral\]), that the Greet’s fuicgiou can cw fonstructed with a mirror image and a linear sgatgv distribution ovcr such a string, sre Fod. \[rays\].[^11] These tdo sitbztjons correspond to the coyncidwnce of $x$ witn the image of $y$ or its ‘ligyt cone’. Thervforw all of them are lf UV naturz.[^12]

$$\begin{srray}{vccc}
  \includegraphics[wibth=4.2cm]{cknfDiagram6soace2.eps}
  &\jvcludegraphics[wiath=4.2bm]{cotfDiagram6null2.eps}
  &\includegwaphics[wivth=4.2cm]{eonfDiagfam6tome2
)=|x-y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ where $|x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$ and $y_I^\mu=(r_0^2/|y|^2) y^\mu$ image $x$ (see around Eq. (\[integral\]) when is in one the Milne regions, $y_I$ is in the other one. than an ‘image charge’, it represents the point where the light cone focuses, Fig. \[rays\] (b)). For $x\neq y$ and both finite, $D^{(1)}_{simple}(x,y)$ has singularities in types situations. is $x$ is on the light cone of $y_I$ (then, $\Delta=0$). The other case arise when the of the logarithmic term in Eq. (\[gsimple\]) vanishes. is convenient to rewrite term as $$\label{arglog} -{3\over 8\pi^2 \log\Big|{\left(|x-y_I|+|y_I|\right)^2-|x|^2\over ~.$$ The vanishes they aligned with respect the origin *and* $|x|^2>|y_I|^2$. This condition defines an ‘image string’ stretching from $y_I$ to infinity. Hence, this occurs only points are different regions. is consistent with of Eq. (\[integral\]), that the Green’s constructed with a mirror image and a linear distribution over a string, see Fig. \[rays\].[^11] These situations correspond to the coincidence of $x$ with image of $y$ or its ‘light cone’. Therefore all of them are of UV nature.[^12] &\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6null2.eps} &\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6time2
)=|x-y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ where $|x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$ aNd $y_I^\mu=(r_0^2/|y|^2)
y^\mU$ is thE imAge Of $X$ (see CommEnts around Eq. (\[inTEgraL\]) and Fig. \[diagram\]). Note that When $y$ Is IN one OF tHe MilNe regioNS, tHEN $y_I$ Is In The OtHEr One. RaTheR than an ‘Image chargE’, it RePresents the pOInT where the lIghT cone focuses, (See fig. \[rayS\] (b)). for $X\Neq y$ aNd bOth fiNite, $D^{(1)}_{sIMple}(x,y)$ Has singulArITies in TWo types OF SiTuatIons. One is when $x$ is oN ThE Light cone of $y_I$ (tHen, $\DelTa=0$). tHe OTHer CasE arise when ThE arguMEnt of thE LoGARIthMIc term in Eq. (\[gsiMple\]) vanisheS. it iS conveNiEnt TO rewriTe thiS tERm aS $$\label{argloG}
-{3\oveR 8\pi^2 r_0^3}\;
\log\BiG|{\left(|x-Y_i|+|y_I|\righT)^2-|X|^2\over 2|y_I|^2}\big|
~.$$ The ArgUmeNt vaNIsHeS whEn THey ARe AliGNed With respEcT tO the oRigiN *AND* $|X|^2>|y_I|^2$. THis CondItion Defines an ‘imagE stRing’ STreTchinG from $Y_I$ to InFinitY. Hence, This sInGularity occurs oNly wHen two poiNts ArE in DiFfereNT Milne RegIonS. This is ConsistENt wItH THE iNterpretation of Eq. (\[iNtEGRaL\]), that the green’s FUnCtIOn can be cOnStrUcteD WIth a mIrroR ImAge and a lInear cHArGe DistribUtIon oveR sUch A stRing, sEE Fig. \[Rays\].[^11] ThEse two siTuatiONs correspond to THe coincidence OF $x$ WITh THe imAge Of $y$ or its ‘ligHt coNE’. TheRefoRE aLl oF Them aRe of Uv nATuRE.[^12]

$$\begin{array}{cccc}
  \inclUdEgraphIcs[wiDth=4.2cm]{confDiagRam6space2.epS}
  &\INCludegraPhicS[WiDTh=4.2cm]{confDiagraM6null2.Eps}
  &\includeGRaphics[wIdth=4.2cM]{confDiaGram6time2
)=|x-y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ wh ere $|x|^2 =\eta _{\ mu\ nu }x^\ mu x ^\nu$ and $y_I ^ \mu= (r_0^2/|y|^2)
y^\mu$ i s the  i m ageo f$x$ ( see com m en t s  ar ou nd  Eq .( \[ integ ral \]) and  Fig. \[di agr am \]). Note th a twhen $y$ i s i n one of the  Mi lne re gi ons ,  then  $y _I$ i s in t h e othe r one. Ra th e r than an ‘ima g e  c harg e’, it represents th e  point where t he lig ht co n e  fo cus es, (see F ig . \[r a ys\] (b ) ). F o r $ x \neq y$ and b oth finite, $D^ {(1)}_ {s imp l e}(x,y )$ ha ss ing ularities i n tw o types o f situ a tions.O ne is w hen $x $ i s o n th e  l ig htco n e o f  $ y_I $  (t hen, $\D el ta =0$).  The o t h er c ase  ari se wh en the argume ntof t h e l ogari thmic  ter min Eq . (\[g simpl e\ ]) vanishes. It  isconvenien t t orew ri te th i s term  as  $$ \label{ arglog} -{3 \o v e r  8 \pi^2 r_0^3}\;
\lo g\ B i g| {\left(| x-y_I| + |y _I | \right)^ 2- |x| ^2\o v e r 2|y _I|^ 2 }\ Big|
~.$ $ Thea rg um ent van is hes wh en  th eyare a l igne d with  respect  to t h e origin *and* $|x|^2>|y_I|^ 2 $. T hi s  con dit ion defines  an‘ imag e st r in g’s tretc hingfr o m$ y_I$ to infinity. H en ce, th is si ngularity occ urs only w h e n  two poi ntsa re in different M ilneregions. T h is is co nsist ent with  the inte r p retation  of  Eq . ( \[i n t eg ral\]), thatt h e Gr ee n’s fun cti on canbecon str uct ed  with a m irror im ag ean da l inear charge d is tri bu tio n ove r  sucha str ing,  s ee Fig . \[ray s \] . [ ^11]  T he se t wosi tuati onsc orr espondto the co inc i denc eof  $x$ wi th the imageof  $y$ or it s‘li ght co n e ’. There fore all of them are of UV natu re. [^12] 

$$ \begin{ar ray }{cccc }
\inclu degrap hics[ wi dth = 4 .2cm] { c on fDi ag ram6space2 . e ps} 
  &\ in clud egraphi cs[width=4.2cm]{co n fDi agram6null2.e ps} 
  & \ i nc lud e gr a phi cs [ wid t h =4.2cm]{confDia gram6time2 
)=|x-y_I|^2/|y_I|^2~,$$ where_$|x|^2=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu$_and $y_I^\mu=(r_0^2/|y|^2)
y^\mu$ is the_image of_$x$_(see comments_around_Eq. (\[integral\]) and Fig. \[diagram\])._Note that when_$y$ is in one_of the Milne_regions,_then $y_I$ is in the other one. Rather than an ‘image charge’, it represents_the_point where_the_light_cone focuses, (see Fig. \[rays\] (b))._For $x\neq y$ and both_finite, $D^{(1)}_{simple}(x,y)$_has singularities in two types of situations. One_is_when $x$ is_on the light cone of $y_I$ (then, $\Delta=0$). The_other case arise when the argument_of the logarithmic_term_in_Eq. (\[gsimple\]) vanishes. It is_convenient to rewrite this term as_$$\label{arglog}
-{3\over 8\pi^2 r_0^3}\;
\log\Big|{\left(|x-y_I|+|y_I|\right)^2-|x|^2\over 2|y_I|^2}\Big|
~.$$ The argument_vanishes when they are aligned with respect_to the origin *and* $|x|^2>|y_I|^2$. This_condition defines an ‘image string’_stretching from_$y_I$ to infinity. Hence, this_singularity occurs only_when two_points are in_different Milne regions. This is consistent_with the interpretation_of Eq. (\[integral\]), that the Green’s function_can_be constructed with_a_mirror_image and_a linear charge_distribution_over such_a_string, see Fig. \[rays\].[^11] These two situations_correspond_to the coincidence of $x$ with the_image of $y$ or_its_‘light cone’. Therefore all_of them are of UV_nature.[^12]

$$\begin{array}{cccc}
  \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6space2.eps}
  &\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6null2.eps}
 _&\includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{confDiagram6time2