1,\delta)$ as long as $\delta $ is kept constant. Such a limit corresponds to the largest range of $T$ where SP are to be anticipated for the two-layer model. However, for practical purposes of simulations using too large $X$ leads to slower convergence. Thus, we choose $X=5,\, Y=25.5$ corresponding to a reasonably wide range where SP is anticipated to exist. Taking into account Eq.(\[K\]), the condition for the SP can be written as &lt; T &lt;. \[SPT\] Keeping in mind the chosen values $X=5, \delta=1/2$, this becomes $8\pi/73 < T < \pi /4$ or $ 0.344< T<0.785$. The results of the simulations will be conducted at the “temperature” $T$ in the middle of the interval $(T_d,T_{BKT})$, that is, $T\approx 0.565$. More specifically, $K_{11}=1/T,\, K_{22}= 25.5 K_{11},\, K_{12}=5K_{11}$. In terms of the original parameters $t_1, t_2, g_2, g$, the relations $gt_2|g_2|(1-5|g_2|)=5$, $gt_1(5.1|g_2|-1)=1$, $t_1\approx 0.177 |g_2|/[(1-4|g_2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ and $10/51 < |g_2| <1/5$ must be satisfied. \[Such a fine tuning is of no concern, since the focus is on the consistency of the paradigm of SP rather than on physical origin of the values\].

Concluding this section, the presented analysis based on the RG finds that it is possible to find a range of temperatures where the sequence of phases is as presented in Fig. \[PD\] in the panel (a): at $T<T_d$ the Josephson coupling is relevant. We call this range as Josephson phase in Fig. \[PD\]. At $ T_d <T< T_{(q_1,q_2)}$ there is the SP where the symmetry $U(1)$ is promoted to U(1)$\times$ U(1). In the range $ T_{(q_1,
1,\delta)$ as long as $ \delta $ is kept constant. Such a limit correspond to the bombastic range of $ T$ where SP are to be anticipated for the two - layer mannequin. However, for practical purposes of pretense use too bombastic $ X$ leads to slower overlap. Thus, we choose $ X=5,\, Y=25.5 $ corresponding to a reasonably wide compass where SP is anticipated to exist. Taking into account Eq.(\[K\ ]), the condition for the SP can be written as & lt; T & lt; . \[SPT\ ] restrain in mind the chosen value $ X=5, \delta=1/2 $, this becomes $ 8\pi/73 < T < \pi /4 $ or $ 0.344 < T<0.785$. The results of the simulations will be conduct at the “ temperature ” $ T$ in the middle of the interval $ (T_d, T_{BKT})$, that is, $ T\approx 0.565$. More specifically, $ K_{11}=1 / T,\, K_{22}= 25.5 K_{11},\, K_{12}=5K_{11}$. In terms of the original parameters $ t_1, t_2, g_2, g$, the relations $ gt_2|g_2|(1 - 5|g_2|)=5 $, $ gt_1(5.1|g_2|-1)=1 $, $ t_1\approx 0.177 |g_2|/[(1 - 4|g_2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ and $ 10/51 < |g_2| < 1/5 $ must be quenched. \[Such a fine tuning is of no concern, since the focus is on the consistency of the paradigm of SP rather than on physical beginning of the values\ ]. 

 Concluding this section, the presented analysis based on the RG finds that it is possible to find a range of temperatures where the succession of phase is as presented in Fig.   \[PD\ ] in the control panel (a ): at $ T < T_d$ the Josephson yoke is relevant. We visit this range as Josephson phase in Fig.   \[PD\ ]. At $ T_d < T < T_{(q_1,q_2)}$ there is the SP where the symmetry $ U(1)$ is promoted to U(1)$\times$ U(1). In the range $ T_{(q_1,
1,\delha)$ as long as $\delta $ is yept constant. Socy a likit codrespondr to the largest range of $T$ xherw SP qre to be anticipated wor the tao-layer nodeo. However, for practleal phvposev of simulationx using tom large $X$ leadv go slower convergence. Thus, we choose $V=5,\, Y=25.5$ cortedponding to a teasomwbly wide range where SP is anticipates to expst. Taking into avcount Eq.(\[K\]), the condition flr tje SP can be writtfn as &lt; T &ot;. \[S[R\] Keeping in mind the bkosen valuea $X=5, \delta=1/2$, this becomes $8\pi/73 < T < \pk /4$ or $ 0.344< T<0.785$. The rgshlhv of the sinulatpons will be gpnductad at tne “temperature” $T$ mn tye middle of the intecval $(T_d,T_{BKT})$, that is, $J\approx 0.565$. Mmrz specifically, $K_{11}=1/T,\, K_{22}= 25.5 J_{11},\, J_{12}=5K_{11}$. In terks ow thd odijinzl parwmevers $t_1, t_2, g_2, f$, the relatuons $gt_2|g_2|(1-5|g_2|)=5$, $gt_1(5.1|g_2|-1)=1$, $t_1\apprpx 0.177 |g_2|/[(1-4|g_2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ and $10/51 < |g_2| <1/5$ must fe satisfied. \[Such a fine tuning is of no boncsrn, since the focus is in the consistency of the paraqigm of SP rather than on physical origin of the ealuea\].

Zoneoudine tjis section, the presented analysis based on trs TG finds that it is possiblr ho sind a range uf tem'srztures where the sfquence of pyases is ws ptesented in Fig. \[PD\] in the pabel (a): at $T<T_d$ rhe Josephson coupping is relzvant. Ee cakl this range as Josephron lhase in Fih. \[PD\]. At $ T_s <T< T_{(q_1,q_2)}$ there is ghe S[ where ufe symmetry $U(1)$ is [romoted vo U(1)$\tnmes$ U(1). Iv thg range $ T_{(q_1,
1,\delta)$ as long as $\delta $ is Such limit corresponds the largest range to anticipated for the model. However, for purposes of simulations using too large leads to slower convergence. Thus, we choose $X=5,\, Y=25.5$ corresponding to a reasonably range where SP is anticipated to exist. Taking into account Eq.(\[K\]), the condition the can written &lt; T &lt;. \[SPT\] Keeping in mind the chosen values $X=5, \delta=1/2$, this becomes $8\pi/73 < < \pi /4$ or $ 0.344< T<0.785$. The of the simulations will conducted at the “temperature” $T$ the of the $(T_d,T_{BKT})$, is, 0.565$. More specifically, K_{22}= 25.5 K_{11},\, K_{12}=5K_{11}$. In terms of the original parameters $t_1, t_2, g_2, g$, the relations $gt_2|g_2|(1-5|g_2|)=5$, $t_1\approx 0.177 $10/51 < <1/5$ be \[Such a fine of no concern, since the focus consistency of the paradigm of SP rather than physical origin the values\]. Concluding this section, the analysis based on the RG finds that it possible to find a range of temperatures where the sequence of phases is as presented \[PD\] in the panel at $T<T_d$ the coupling relevant. call range as phase in Fig. \[PD\]. At $ T_d <T< T_{(q_1,q_2)}$ there is SP where the symmetry $U(1)$ is promoted to U(1)$\times$ U(1). range T_{(q_1,
1,\delta)$ as long as $\delta $ is kept cOnstant. SucH a limIt cOrrEsPondS to tHe largest range OF $T$ whEre SP are to be anticipateD for tHe TWo-laYEr Model. however, FOr PRActIcAl PurPoSEs Of simUlaTions usIng too largE $X$ lEaDs to slower coNVeRgence. Thus, We cHoose $X=5,\, Y=25.5$ correSpoNding tO a ReaSOnablY wiDe ranGe wherE sP is anTicipated To EXist. TaKIng into ACCoUnt EQ.(\[K\]), the condition for THe sp can be written aS &lt; T &lt;. \[sPt\] keEPIng In mInd the chosEn ValueS $x=5, \delta=1/2$, tHIs BECOmeS $8\Pi/73 < T < \pi /4$ or $ 0.344< T<0.785$. The reSults of the sIMulAtions WiLl bE ConducTed at ThE “TemPerature” $T$ in The mIddle of thE interVAl $(T_d,T_{BKt})$, That is, $T\Approx 0.565$. morE spEcifICaLlY, $K_{11}=1/T,\, k_{22}= 25.5 K_{11},\, k_{12}=5k_{11}$. In TErMs oF The Original PaRaMeterS $t_1, t_2, g_2, G$, THE RelaTioNs $gt_2|G_2|(1-5|g_2|)=5$, $gt_1(5.1|g_2|-1)=1$, $T_1\approx 0.177 |g_2|/[(1-4|g_2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ and $10/51 < |G_2| <1/5$ muSt be SAtiSfied. \[such a Fine TuNing iS of no cOncerN, sInce the focus is oN the ConsistenCy oF tHe pArAdigm OF SP ratHer ThaN on physIcal oriGIn oF tHE VAlUes\].

Concluding this sEcTIOn, The preseNted anALySiS Based on tHe rG fInds THAt it iS posSIbLe to find A range OF tEmPeraturEs Where tHe SeqUenCe of pHAses Is as prEsented iN Fig. \[Pd\] In the panel (a): at $T<t_D$ the Josephson COuPLInG Is reLevAnt. We call thIs raNGe as josePHsOn pHAse in fig. \[PD\]. at $ t_D <T< t_{(Q_1,q_2)}$ there is the SP where ThE symmeTry $U(1)$ iS promoted to U(1)$\tImes$ U(1). In the RANGe $ T_{(q_1,
1,\delta)$ as long as $\de lta $ is k ept c ons tan t.  Suc h alimit correspo n ds t o the largest range of  $T$wh e re S P  a re to  be ant i ci p a ted  f or  th et wo -laye r m odel. H owever, fo r p ra ctical purpo s es  of simula tio ns using too  la rge $X $lea d s toslo wer c onverg e nce. T hus, we c ho o se $X= 5 ,\, Y=2 5 . 5$  cor responding to a r e as o nably wide ran ge whe re SP i s a nti cipated to  e xist. Takingi nt o a cco u nt Eq.(\[K\]) , the condi t ion  for t he  SP can be  writ te n  as  &lt; T &lt ;. \ [SPT\] Ke epingi n mindt he chos en val ues  $X =5,\ de lt a=1 /2 $ , t h is  be c ome s $8\pi/ 73  <  T <\pi/ 4 $ or $  0. 344<  T<0. 785$. The res ult s of the  simu latio ns w il l beconduc ted a tthe “temperatur e” $ T$ in the  mi dd leof  thei nterva l $ (T_ d,T_{BK T})$, t h atis , $ T\ approx 0.565$. Mor es p ec ifically , $K_{ 1 1} =1 / T,\, K_{ 22 }=25.5 K _{11} ,\,K _{ 12}=5K_{ 11}$.I nte rms ofth e orig in alpar amete r s $t _1, t_ 2, g_2,g$, t h e relations $g t _2|g_2|(1-5|g _ 2| ) = 5$ ,  $gt _1( 5.1|g_2|-1) =1$, $t_1 \app r ox  0. 1 77 |g _2|/[ (1 - 4| g _2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ a nd  $10/5 1 < | g_2| <1/5$ mu st be sati s f i ed. \[Su ch a fi n e tuning is of  no c oncern, si n ce the f ocusis on th e consist e n cy of th e p ara dig m o f SP  rather thano n  phy si cal ori gin  of the  va lue s\] .
Co ncludingthis sec ti on ,th e p resen t ed analy si s b as edon th e  RG fi nds t hatit  i s  po ssiblet of i nd a  r an ge o f t em perat ures whe re thesequenceofp hase sis  as pre sented in Fig .\[PD\] inth e p anel ( a ) : at $T< T_d$ the Josephson coup l ing isrel evant . We  call thi s r ange a s J o sephso n phas e inFi g.\ [ PD\]. A t$ T _d  <T< T_{(q _ 1 ,q_ 2)}$th ereis theSP where the symme t ry$U(1)$ is pro mot ed t o U( 1)$ \ ti m es$  U ( 1). I n the range $ T _{(q_1,
1,\delta)$ as_long as_$\delta $ is kept_constant. Such_a_limit corresponds_to_the largest range_of $T$ where_SP are to be_anticipated for the_two-layer_model. However, for practical purposes of simulations using too large $X$ leads to slower_convergence._Thus, we_choose_$X=5,\,_Y=25.5$ corresponding to a reasonably_wide range where SP is_anticipated to_exist. Taking into account Eq.(\[K\]), the condition for_the_SP can be_written as &lt; T &lt;. \[SPT\] Keeping in mind_the chosen values $X=5, \delta=1/2$, this_becomes $8\pi/73 <_T_<_\pi /4$ or $_0.344< T<0.785$. The results of the_simulations will be conducted at the_“temperature” $T$ in the middle of the_interval $(T_d,T_{BKT})$, that is, $T\approx 0.565$._More specifically, $K_{11}=1/T,\, K_{22}= 25.5_K_{11},\, K_{12}=5K_{11}$._In terms of the original_parameters $t_1, t_2,_g_2, g$,_the relations $gt_2|g_2|(1-5|g_2|)=5$,_$gt_1(5.1|g_2|-1)=1$, $t_1\approx 0.177 |g_2|/[(1-4|g_2|)(5.1|g_2|-1)$ and $10/51_< |g_2| <1/5$_must be satisfied. \[Such a fine_tuning_is of no_concern,_since_the focus_is on the_consistency_of the_paradigm_of SP rather than on physical_origin_of the values\].

Concluding this section, the presented_analysis based on the_RG_finds that it is_possible to find a range_of temperatures where the sequence of_phases is_as presented_in Fig. \[PD\] in the panel (a): at $T<T_d$ the Josephson coupling_is relevant. We call this range_as Josephson phase in_Fig. \[PD\]. At_$_T_d <T< T_{(q_1,q_2)}$_there_is the_SP where the symmetry $U(1)$ is promoted_to U(1)$\times$_U(1). In the range $ T_{(q_1,