km\]. At even longer arm lengths, employing DFI would become clearly advantageous.

Of course, these considerations show that a longer-baseline detector with good sensitivity in the standard space-based detector frequency band of interest would make a scientifically much more interesting case than the default short-arm OGO which we presented first. However, as no study on the required orbits has been done so far, we consider such a detector variant to be highly hypothetical and not worthy of a detailed study of technological feasibility and scientific potential yet. Instead, for the remainder of this paper, we concentrate again on the conservative 1400km version of OGO. Although the sensitivity curve in Fig. \[F:Sens\] already demonstrates its limited potential, we will attempt to neutrally assess its advantages, limitations and scientific reach.

Technological feasibility {#sec:feasibility}
-------------------------

Employing DFI requires a large number of spacecraft but on the other hand allows us to relax many of the very strict technological requirements of other space-based GW detector proposals such as (e)LISA and DECIGO. Specifically, the clock noise is canceled by design, so there is no need for a complicated clock tone transfer chain [@barke2010]. Furthermore, OGO does not require a drag-free technology, and the configuration has to be stabilized only as much as required for the equal arm length assumption to hold. This strongly reduces the requirements on the spacecraft thrusters. Also, for the end mirrors, which have to be mounted on the same monolithic structure for all four laser links per spacecraft, it is not required that they are freefalling. Instead, they can be fixed to the spacecraft.

Still, to reach the shot-noise-only limited sensitivity shown in Fig. \[F:Sens\], the secondary noise contributions from all components of the measurement system must be significantly below the shot-noise level. Considering a shot-noise level of about $2\cdot 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{m}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ – which is in agreement with the value derived earlier for the 1400km version of OGO – this might be challenging.

When actively controlling the spacecraft position and hence stabilizing the distance and relative velocity between the spacecraft, we will be able to lower the heterodyne frequency of the laser beat notes drastically. Where LISA will have a beat note frequency in the tens of MHz, with OGO’s short arm length we could be speaking of kHz or less and might even consider
km\ ]. At even longer arm lengths, employing DFI would become intelligibly advantageous. 

 Of naturally, these considerations show that a long - service line detector with good sensitivity in the standard space - based detector frequency set of interest would make a scientifically a lot more interesting subject than the default short - sleeve OGO which we presented first. However, as no sketch on the required scope has been done so far, we see such a detector variant to be highly hypothetical and not worthy of a detailed sketch of technological feasibility and scientific potential yet. Instead, for the end of this paper, we boil down again on the conservative 1400 km version of OGO. Although the sensitivity curvature in Fig.   \[F: Sens\ ] already demonstrates its limited potential, we will attempt to neutrally assess its advantages, limitations and scientific reach. 

 Technological feasibility { # sec: feasibility } 
 ------------------------- 

 Employing DFI requires a large number of spacecraft but on the other hand allows us to relax many of the very strict technical requirement of other quad - based GW detector proposals such as (e)LISA and DECIGO. Specifically, the clock noise is canceled by invention, so there is no need for a complicated clock tone transfer range   [ @barke2010 ]. Furthermore, OGO does not require a drag - free technology, and the configuration has to be stabilized only as much as required for the equal arm duration assumption to oblige. This strongly reduces the requirements on the spacecraft thrusters. Also, for the goal mirrors, which have to be mounted on the like monolithic social organization for all four laser links per spacecraft, it is not required that they are freefalling. Instead, they can be fixed to the spacecraft. 

 Still, to pass the shot - noise - merely limited sensitivity read in Fig.   \[F: Sens\ ], the secondary randomness contributions from all components of the measurement arrangement must be significantly below the shot - randomness level. Considering a shot - noise level of about $ 2\cdot 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{m}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ – which is in agreement with the value derived earlier for the 1400 km version of OGO – this might be challenging. 

 When actively controlling the spacecraft military position and hence stabilizing the distance and proportional velocity between the spacecraft, we will be able to lower the heterodyne frequency of the laser beat notes drastically. Where LISA will have a beat note frequency in the ten-spot of MHz, with OGO ’s short arm length we could be speaking of kHz or less and might even see
km\]. Wt even longer arm lengtms, employing DFI would uecome dlearly xdvantageous.

Of course, these ronsuderaupons show that a longdr-baselinv detectoe wiuh good sensitivivg in thc stahfard wpace-based detgctor frequetcy band of indefedt would make a scientifically much more imtfresting case jhan uhe defzllu short-arm OGO which we presented first. Iowever, as no syudy on the required orbitd had been done so far, we considet susy a detector variant to be highly gypothetical and not worthy of x detciled study od tfwhnological feaspbility and sgpentifiw potenyial yet. Instesd, hor rhe remainder of this paper, we concentrwte again ou the conservative 1400km vwrsiot of OGO. Qltfoufh tge senditmvity curve in Fig. \[F:Senw\] already demonstraues pys limited pktentiwl, we will attempt to neutrally assess itv asvantages, limitations abd scientific reach.

Tefhnologicwl feasibility {#sec:feasibility}
-------------------------

Employing DFI requiras a mxrgt kmmbef ov spacecraft but on the other hand allows us ek tekax many of thc very strict techmopobycal requiremgnts of otger space-based GW fetectot propisals sucr as (e)LISA and DECIGO. Specificaoly, the cloch noise is canceled by design, ro tnere os no need for a complieated dlock tone hransfer dfain [@barke2010]. Furthefmoge, OCO does not require a drag-sree techiologv, and thd comfigurwtion has ho be stabilized only as much av required for the equal arm length assum'vion to hold. Jhiv snrongly rzduces the requiremqnts on the spccecraft thrurters. Also, for thx end mirrorf, which have dl be mounted on the fame monilithic rtructure for sll four laser linkw per spacecraft, ib is vkt required thac uhwy are freefalkine. Igsneav, ther can be fixeg to thd spacdcraft.

Sunll, go rrach the shot-noise-onny ljmited sensitivity smown in Fug. \[F:Sens\], ehe secondary noise contributiojs frmm ell cokpogents of the measurement systej must be sinnificantly bqlow the shot-noixe level. Considering a shot-noise level if about $2\cdot 10^{-17}\,\mathem{m}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ – whncm is in agrexment rith the ealue derived earliee for the 1400km verslon of OGO – this might be chdllenhing.

When actively controlling the spacecraft position and hence stabilizibg the distance ans rekativv vzloeity beeweei vhe spacecraft, we will be able to lower the hetecodyne frexuzncy of the laser beat notes crxstically. Whete LISA will have a beat nkte freqiency in the tens of MHz, with OBO’s short arm length we gould be wpeakjng of kHz or less and might even eonsidwr
km\]. At even longer arm lengths, employing become advantageous. Of these considerations show good in the standard detector frequency band interest would make a scientifically much interesting case than the default short-arm OGO which we presented first. However, as study on the required orbits has been done so far, we consider such detector to highly and not worthy of a detailed study of technological feasibility and scientific potential yet. Instead, for remainder of this paper, we concentrate again on conservative 1400km version of Although the sensitivity curve in \[F:Sens\] demonstrates its potential, will to neutrally assess advantages, limitations and scientific reach. Technological feasibility {#sec:feasibility} ------------------------- Employing DFI requires a large number of spacecraft on the allows us relax of very strict technological other space-based GW detector proposals such DECIGO. Specifically, the clock noise is canceled by so there no need for a complicated clock transfer chain [@barke2010]. Furthermore, OGO does not require drag-free technology, and the configuration has to be stabilized only as much as required for arm length assumption to This strongly reduces requirements the thrusters. for the mirrors, which have to be mounted on the same monolithic structure all four laser links per spacecraft, it is not required are Instead, they can fixed to the spacecraft. to the shot-noise-only limited sensitivity Fig. the from components the measurement system must significantly below the shot-noise level. a shot-noise level of is in agreement with the value derived earlier the 1400km version of OGO – this be challenging. When actively controlling the spacecraft position and hence stabilizing the and relative the spacecraft, we will be able to lower heterodyne frequency of the beat notes drastically. Where LISA will have a beat frequency the tens MHz, with OGO’s arm length we be speaking of less and even
km\]. At even longer arm lengths, eMploying DFi woulD beComE cLearLy adVantageous.

Of coURse, tHese considerations show That a LoNGer-bASeLine dEtector WItH GOod SeNsItiViTY iN the sTanDard spaCe-based detEctOr Frequency banD Of Interest woUld Make a scientiFicAlly muCh MorE InterEstIng caSe than THe defaUlt short-aRm ogO whicH We preseNTEd FirsT. However, as no study ON tHE required orbitS has beEn DOnE SO faR, we Consider suCh A deteCTor variANt TO BE hiGHly hypotheticAl and not worTHy oF a detaIlEd sTUdy of tEchnoLoGIcaL feasibilitY and ScientifiC potenTIal yet. INStead, foR the reMaiNdeR of tHIs PaPer, We COncENtRatE AgaIn on the cOnSeRvatiVe 1400km VERSIon oF OGo. AltHough The sensitivitY cuRve iN fig. \[f:Sens\] AlreaDy deMoNstraTes its LimitEd Potential, we will AtteMpt to neutRalLy AssEsS its aDVantagEs, lImiTations And scieNTifIc REACh.

technological feasiBiLITy {#Sec:feasiBility}
-------------------------

eMpLoYIng DFI reQuIreS a laRGE numbEr of SPaCecraft bUt on thE OtHeR hand alLoWs us to ReLax ManY of thE Very Strict TechnoloGical REquirements of oTHer space-based gw dETEcTOr prOpoSals such as (e)lISA ANd DEcIGO. sPeCifICally, The clOcK NoISe is canceled by desigN, sO there Is no nEed for a compliCated clock TONE transfeR chaIN [@bARke2010]. Furthermore, oGO doEs not requiRE a drag-frEe tecHnology, aNd the confIGUration hAs tO be StaBilIZEd Only as much as rEQUireD fOr the eqUal Arm lengTh aSsuMptIon To Hold. This sTrongly rEdUcEs ThE reQuireMEnts on thE sPacEcRafT thruSTers. AlSo, for The eNd MiRRorS, which hAVe TO Be moUnTeD on tHe sAmE monoLithIC stRucture For all fouR laSEr liNkS pEr spaceCraft, it is not rEqUired that tHeY arE freefALLing. InstEad, they can be fixed to the sPAcecrafT.

StIll, to ReacH the shot-nOisE-only lImiTEd sensItivitY showN iN FiG. \[f:sens\], tHE SeConDaRy noise conTRIbuTions FrOm alL componEnts of the measuremeNT syStem must be sigNifIcanTLY bEloW ThE ShoT-nOIse LEVel. Considering a Shot-noise lEvEL oF about $2\cdot 10^{-17}\,\MAthRm{M}/\sqrt{\maThrm{Hz}}$ – wHich iS In agreeMent with tHe value deRiVed eARLieR for the 1400km vErsion of oGO – this miGHt be cHAlLengiNg.

WHen actIvEly ContrOlling THe sPacecRaft poSiTion anD hencE sTabiliziNg the distance and relativE velocIty beTweEn the spacEcrAFt, wE will be abLe to Lower the heTerOdyNe freQueNCy of tHe laSEr BeaT Notes DrasTIcally. WheRE LiSA WILl Have a beat noTE FReqUency In tHE tens oF MHz, With OGO’s short arm lENgth we could be sPeakING of KHz OR lesS aNd might even conSidEr
km\]. At even longer arm l engths, em ployi ngDFI  w ould  bec ome clearly ad v anta geous.

Of course, the se co ns i dera t io ns sh ow that al o nge r- ba sel in e  d etect orwith go od sensiti vit yin the stand a rd  space-bas eddetector fre que ncy ba nd  of inter est  woul d make a scie ntificall ym uch mo r e inter e s ti ng c ase than the defa u lt short-arm OGOwhichwe pr e s ent edfirst. How ev er, a s  no stu d yo n the required orbi ts has been don e so f ar , w e  consi der s uc h  adetector va rian t to be h ighlyh ypothet i cal and  not w ort hyof a de ta ile ds tud y  o f t e chn ological  f ea sibil itya n d scie nti ficpoten tial yet. Ins tea d, f o r t he re maind er o fthispaper,  we c on centrate againon t he conser vat iv e 1 40 0km v e rsionofOGO . Altho ugh the sen si t i v it y curve in Fig. \[ F: S e ns \] alrea dy dem o ns tr a tes itsli mit ed p o t entia l, w e  w ill atte mpt to ne ut rally a ss ess it sadv ant ages, limi tation s and sc ienti f ic reach.

Tec h nological fea s ib i l it y  {#s ec: feasibility }
-- - ---- ---- - -- --- - ----- --

E mp l oy i ng DFI requires a l ar ge num ber o f spacecraftbut on the o t her hand  all o ws us to relax ma ny of  the verys trict te chnol ogical r equiremen t s  of othe r s pac e-b ase d GW  detector pro p o sals  s uch as(e) LISA an d D ECI GO.  Sp ec ifically,  the clo ck  n oi se  is  canc e led by d es ign ,sothere is noneedforaco m pli cated c l oc k tone  t ra nsfe r c ha in [@ bark e 201 0]. Fur thermore,  OG O  doe sno t requi re a drag-fre etechnology ,and  the c o n figurati on has to be stabilized only as  mu ch as  req uired for  th e equa l a r m leng th ass umpti on  to h old.T h is  st ro ngly reduc e s  th e req ui reme nts onthe spacecraft thr u ste rs. Also, for  th e en d mi rro r s, whi ch hav e to be mounted o n the same  m o no lithic str u ctu re  for al l fourlaser links p er spacec raft, itis  not r equ ired thatthey are  freefall i ng. I n st ead,the y canbe  fi xed t o thes pac ecraf t.

St il l, toreach  t he shot- noise-only limited sens itivit y sho wnin Fig. \ [F: S ens \], the s econ dary noise  co ntr ibuti ons fromallc om pon e nts o f th e  measurem e nt  sy s t em  must be si g n i fic antly  be l ow the  sho t-noise level. Co n sidering a sho t-no i s e l eve l  ofab out $2\cdot 10 ^{- 17 } \ ,\mathrm {m }/\sqrt{\ma thrm{Hz} }$ – whi ch isin agr eementw i th the va lueder ived earl ier  f o r the 1 40 0k m  versi on o fOGO –this m i ghtb e  challenging.

W hen a c t ively con troll in g the s p acec raft posit ion and hen ce sta bili zingthe dis ta nce an d r el ative velo c ity betwe en th e space cr aft,  we  willbe a b l e tolowe rthe  heterody n e  f r eq ue n cyof t he la se r be at notesd rastical ly. Where L IS A w i l l have ab e at note fr equ encyi n  the tenso f MH z ,w ith O GO’s s hort a rm leng t h w ecould b e s p e aking ofkHz or le s s a nd  mig ht evenco nsid er 
km\]. At_even longer_arm lengths, employing DFI_would become_clearly_advantageous.

Of course,_these_considerations show that_a longer-baseline detector_with good sensitivity in_the standard space-based_detector_frequency band of interest would make a scientifically much more interesting case than the_default_short-arm OGO_which_we_presented first. However, as no_study on the required orbits_has been_done so far, we consider such a detector_variant_to be highly_hypothetical and not worthy of a detailed study of_technological feasibility and scientific potential yet._Instead, for the_remainder_of_this paper, we concentrate_again on the conservative 1400km version_of OGO. Although the sensitivity curve_in Fig. \[F:Sens\] already demonstrates its limited potential,_we will attempt to neutrally assess_its advantages, limitations and scientific_reach.

Technological feasibility_{#sec:feasibility}
-------------------------

Employing DFI requires a large_number of spacecraft_but on_the other hand_allows us to relax many of_the very strict_technological requirements of other space-based GW_detector_proposals such as_(e)LISA_and_DECIGO. Specifically,_the clock noise_is_canceled by_design,_so there is no need for_a_complicated clock tone transfer chain [@barke2010]. Furthermore, OGO_does not require a_drag-free_technology, and the configuration_has to be stabilized only_as much as required for the_equal arm_length assumption_to hold. This strongly reduces the requirements on the spacecraft thrusters._Also, for the end mirrors, which_have to be mounted_on the_same_monolithic structure for_all_four laser_links per spacecraft, it is not required_that they_are freefalling. Instead, they can be_fixed to the spacecraft.

Still,_to_reach the shot-noise-only limited sensitivity shown_in Fig. \[F:Sens\], the secondary noise contributions_from all components of the_measurement_system_must be significantly below the_shot-noise level. Considering a shot-noise level_of about $2\cdot_10^{-17}\,\mathrm{m}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ – which is in agreement with_the_value derived earlier for the 1400km_version_of OGO – this might be_challenging.

When_actively_controlling the spacecraft position and_hence stabilizing the distance and relative_velocity between the spacecraft, we will be able to_lower the heterodyne_frequency of the laser beat_notes_drastically._Where LISA will have a beat note frequency in the_tens of_MHz, with OGO’s_short arm length we could be speaking of kHz or_less and might even consider