Omega|$ denotes the Lebesgue measure of $\Omega$. Unfortunately, in the literature we were not able to find any measurements of Ezrin concentrations in cells in order to support this assumption. Nevertheless we believe the assumption to be reasonable and to represent the typical situation for most membrane-active proteins in a cell, since assuming $c_vL\sim u_{\max}$ would mean that the typical number of protein molecules in the cytosol equals the typical number in the membrane, meaning a (highly unlikely) perfect recruitment to the membrane. We now introduce the spatial concentration average and residual $$\bar{v} = \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Omega v \, {{\mathrm d}}x, \quad r = v-\bar{v}.$$ Using -, the functions $\bar v$ and $r$ are governed by the differential equations $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{{{\mathrm d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}t} &= \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Omega \mu\Delta v- \operatorname{div}(vw) \, {{\mathrm d}}x 
= \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Gamma D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2, &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Omega,\\
\partial_t r &= \mu\Delta r - \operatorname{div}(rw) - \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Gamma D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2 &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Omega, \\
\mu\nabla r\cdot n &= D-A &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Gamma, \\
r(0,\cdot) &= r_0 &&\text{on }\Omega, \\
\bar v(0)&=\bar v_0,\\
\int_\Omega r \, {{\mathrm d}}x &= 0\end{aligned}$$ for $\bar v_0=\int_\Omega v_0\,{{\mathrm d}}x/|\Omega|$ and $r_0=v_0-\bar v_0$, where we used integration by parts and $w\cdot n=0$ on $\Gamma$, and where ${\mathcal{H}}^2$ denotes the surface (two-dimensional Hausdorff) measure. Introducing $$r = c_v\hat{r},\
\bar v=c_v\hat v$$ as well as the P
Omega|$ denotes the Lebesgue measure of $ \Omega$. Unfortunately, in the literature we were not able to find any measurements of Ezrin concentration in cell in order to support this assumption. however we believe the assumption to be reasonable and to act the typical situation for most membrane - active protein in a cellular telephone, since assuming $ c_vL\sim u_{\max}$ would mean that the distinctive number of protein molecules in the cytosol equal the distinctive number in the membrane, meaning a (highly improbable) perfect recruitment to the membrane. We now insert the spatial concentration average and residual $ $ \bar{v } = \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Omega v \, { { \mathrm d}}x, \quad r = v-\bar{v}.$$ Using -, the function $ \bar v$ and $ r$ are governed by the differential equations $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{{{\mathrm d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}t } & = \frac{1}{|\Omega| } \int_\Omega \mu\Delta v- \operatorname{div}(vw) \, { { \mathrm d}}x 
 = \frac{1}{|\Omega| } \int_\Gamma D - A \, d\mathcal{H}^2, & & \text{on } (0,T)\times\Omega,\\ 
 \partial_t r & = \mu\Delta r - \operatorname{div}(rw) - \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Gamma D - angstrom \, d\mathcal{H}^2 & & \text{on } (0,T)\times\Omega, \\ 
 \mu\nabla r\cdot n & = D - A & & \text{on } (0,T)\times\Gamma, \\ 
 r(0,\cdot) & = r_0 & & \text{on } \Omega, \\ 
 \bar v(0)&=\bar v_0,\\ 
 \int_\Omega r \, { { \mathrm d}}x & = 0\end{aligned}$$ for $ \bar v_0=\int_\Omega v_0\,{{\mathrm d}}x/|\Omega|$ and $ r_0 = v_0-\bar v_0 $, where we used integration by parts and $ w\cdot n=0 $ on $ \Gamma$, and where $ { \mathcal{H}}^2 $ denotes the open (two - dimensional Hausdorff) measure. Introducing $ $ r = c_v\hat{r},\ 
 \bar v = c_v\hat v$$ as well as the P
Omeha|$ denotes the Lebesgue oeasure of $\Omegc$. Unforvunatelg, in the literature we were not able ti fine any measurements of Dzrin conbentratiobs ii cells in order to support thjd asvnmption. Neverthgless we belheve the assum[tkou to be reasonable and to represent ehe typocwl situation fjr mpft msmbrane-active proteins in a cell, sjnce asvuming $c_vL\sim u_{\max}$ would mean that the hypifal number of protfin moleculga ig the cytosol equals tht cypical numger in the membrane, meaning a (hkghly unlikely) kzefefj recruitmenv to tre membrane. We now ittroducr the spatial gonceitrarion average and resivual $$\bar{v} = \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\ynt_\Omega e \, {{\mathrm d}}x, \quad r = c-\bar{v}.$$ Usitg -, gye wundtmona $\bar g$ aid $r$ are goberned by tye differential equstyins $$\begin{alighed}
\fras{{{\mwthrm d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}t} &= \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Omegd \mh\Delta v- \operatorname{dic}(vw) \, {{\mathrm d}}x 
= \frac{1}{|\Olega|} \int_\Gwmma D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2, &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Omega,\\
\partial_t r &= \ku\Delva r - \oieragirjame{div}(rw) - \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Gamma D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2 &&\tevf{om }(0,N)\times\Omega, \\
\mu\nabja r\cdot n &= D-W &&\ygxt{on }(0,T)\times\Gaoma, \\
r(0,\cbkt) &= r_0 &&\text{on }\Omega, \\
\bwr v(0)&=\bar v_0,\\
\int_\Imega r \, {{\iathtm d}}x &= 0\end{aligned}$$ for $\bar v_0=\unt_\Omega v_0\,{{\manhrm d}}x/|\Omega|$ and $r_0=v_0-\bar v_0$, where we usec intrgration by parts and $w\edot n=0$ on $\Gamma$, ajd where ${\jxthcal{H}}^2$ denotes ghe sgrface (two-dimensional Hausqorff) meawure. Introdjcinb $$r = c_d\hat{r},\
\bar v=f_v\hat v$$ as well as the P
Omega|$ denotes the Lebesgue measure of $\Omega$. the we were able to find in in order to this assumption. Nevertheless believe the assumption to be reasonable to represent the typical situation for most membrane-active proteins in a cell, since $c_vL\sim u_{\max}$ would mean that the typical number of protein molecules in the equals typical in membrane, meaning a (highly unlikely) perfect recruitment to the membrane. We now introduce the spatial concentration and residual $$\bar{v} = \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Omega v \, {{\mathrm \quad r = v-\bar{v}.$$ -, the functions $\bar v$ $r$ governed by differential $$\begin{aligned} d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}t} &= \int_\Omega \mu\Delta v- \operatorname{div}(vw) \, {{\mathrm d}}x = \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Gamma D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2, &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Omega,\\ \partial_t r \mu\Delta r - \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Gamma \, &&\text{on \\ \mu\nabla r\cdot D-A &&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Gamma, \\ r(0,\cdot) &= \\ \bar v(0)&=\bar v_0,\\ \int_\Omega r \, {{\mathrm &= 0\end{aligned}$$ $\bar v_0=\int_\Omega v_0\,{{\mathrm d}}x/|\Omega|$ and $r_0=v_0-\bar where we used integration by parts and $w\cdot on $\Gamma$, and where ${\mathcal{H}}^2$ denotes the surface (two-dimensional Hausdorff) measure. Introducing $$r = c_v\hat{r},\ v$$ as well as P
Omega|$ denotes the Lebesgue meAsure of $\OmeGa$. UnfOrtUnaTeLy, in The lIterature we werE Not aBle to find any measuremenTs of EZrIN conCEnTratiOns in ceLLs IN OrdEr To SupPoRT tHis asSumPtion. NeVertheless We bElIeve the assumPTiOn to be reasOnaBle and to reprEseNt the tYpIcaL SituaTioN for mOst memBRane-acTive proteInS In a celL, Since asSUMiNg $c_vl\sim u_{\max}$ would mean THaT The typical numbEr of prOtEIn MOLecUleS in the cytoSoL equaLS the typICaL NUMbeR In the membrane, Meaning a (higHLy uNlikelY) pErfECt recrUitmeNt TO thE membrane. We Now iNtroduce tHe spatIAl conceNTration AveragE anD reSiduAL $$\bAr{V} = \frAc{1}{|\oMegA|}\InT_\OmEGa v \, {{\Mathrm d}}x, \QuAd R = v-\bar{V}.$$ UsiNG -, THE funCtiOns $\bAr v$ anD $r$ are governed By tHe diFFerEntiaL equaTionS $$\bEgin{aLigned}
\Frac{{{\mAtHrm d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}T} &= \fraC{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\omeGa \Mu\DElTa v- \opERatornAme{Div}(Vw) \, {{\mathrM d}}x 
= \frac{1}{|\oMegA|} \iNT_\gAmMa D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2, &&\text{oN }(0,T)\TIMeS\Omega,\\
\paRtial_t R &= \Mu\deLTa r - \operaToRnaMe{diV}(RW) - \frac{1}{|\omegA|}\InT_\Gamma D-A \, D\mathcAL{H}^2 &&\TeXt{on }(0,T)\tiMeS\Omega, \\
\Mu\NabLa r\Cdot n &= d-a &&\texT{on }(0,T)\tiMes\Gamma, \\
R(0,\cdot) &= R_0 &&\Text{on }\Omega, \\
\bar V(0)&=\Bar v_0,\\
\int_\Omega r \, {{\MAtHRM d}}X &= 0\End{aLigNed}$$ for $\bar v_0=\iNt_\OmEGa v_0\,{{\mAthrM D}}x/|\omeGA|$ and $r_0=V_0-\bar v_0$, WhERe WE used integration by pArTs and $w\Cdot n=0$ On $\Gamma$, and wheRe ${\mathcal{H}}^2$ DENOtes the sUrfaCE (tWO-dimensional HaUsdorFf) measure. INTroducinG $$r = c_v\hAt{r},\
\bar v=c_V\hat v$$ as weLL As the P
Omega|$ denotes the Lebesg ue measure  of $ \Om ega $.  Unf ortu nately, in the lite rature we were not abl e tofi n d an y  m easur ementso fE z rin  c on cen tr a ti ons i n c ells in  order tosup po rt this assu m pt ion. Never the less we beli eve  the a ss ump t ion t o b e rea sonabl e  and t o represe nt the ty p ical si t u at ionfor most membrane - ac t ive proteins i n a ce ll ,  s i n ceass uming $c_v L\ sim u _ {\max}$ wo u l d  me a n that the ty pical numbe r  of  prote in  mo l ecules  in t he cyt osol equals  the  typicalnumber in them embrane , mean ing  a(hig h ly  u nli ke l y)p er fec t  re cruitmen tto  thememb r a n e . We  no w in trodu ce the spatia l c once n tra tionavera ge a nd  resi dual $ $\bar {v } = \frac{1}{|\ Omeg a|}\int_\ Ome ga  v\,  {{\m a thrm d }}x , \ quad r= v-\ba r {v} .$ $ U si ng -, the function s$ \ ba r v$ and  $r$ a r ego v erned by  t hediff e r entia l eq u at ions $$\ begin{ a li gn ed}
\fr ac {{{\ma th rmd}} \bar{ v }}{{ {\math rm d}}t}  &= \ f rac{1}{|\Omega | } \int_\Omega \m u \ De l ta v - \ operatornam e{di v }(vw ) \, {{ \ma t hrm d }}x =\ fr a c{1}{|\Omega|} \int _\ GammaD-A \ , d\mathcal{H }^2, &&\te x t { on }(0,T )\ti m es \ Omega,\\
\part ial_t  r &= \mu\ D elta r -  \ope ratornam e{div}(rw ) - \frac{ 1}{ |\O meg a|} \ i nt _\Gamma D-A \ , d\ma th cal{H}^ 2 & &\text{ on}(0 ,T) \ti me s\Omega,\\
\mu\n ab la  r \c dot  n &= D-A &&\t ex t{o n}(0 ,T)\t i mes\Ga mma,\\
r (0 ,\ c dot ) &= r_ 0  & & \ text {o n}\Om ega ,\\
\b ar v ( 0)& =\bar v _0,\\
\in t_\ O mega  r  \ , {{\ma thrm d}}x &=0\ end{aligne d} $$for $\ b a r v_0=\i nt_\Omega v_0\,{{\mathr m  d}}x/| \Om ega|$  and  $r_0=v_0 -\b ar v_0 $,w here w e used  inte gr ati o n  by p a r ts  an d$w\cdot n= 0 $  on  $\Ga mm a$,and whe re ${\mathcal{H}}^ 2 $ d enotes the su rfa ce ( t w o- dim e ns i ona lH aus d o rff) measure. I ntroducing  $ $ r= c_v\hat{ r },\ 
\ bar v=c _v\hatv$$ a s  well a s the P
Omega|$ denotes_the Lebesgue_measure of $\Omega$. Unfortunately,_in the_literature_we were_not_able to find_any measurements of_Ezrin concentrations in cells_in order to_support_this assumption. Nevertheless we believe the assumption to be reasonable and to represent the_typical_situation for_most_membrane-active_proteins in a cell, since_assuming $c_vL\sim u_{\max}$ would mean_that the_typical number of protein molecules in the cytosol_equals_the typical number_in the membrane, meaning a (highly unlikely) perfect recruitment_to the membrane. We now introduce_the spatial concentration_average_and_residual $$\bar{v} = \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Omega_v \, {{\mathrm d}}x, \quad r_= v-\bar{v}.$$ Using -, the functions_$\bar v$ and $r$ are governed by_the differential equations $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{{{\mathrm d}}\bar{v}}{{{\mathrm d}}t}_&= \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Omega \mu\Delta v-_\operatorname{div}(vw) \,_{{\mathrm d}}x 
= \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_\Gamma_D-A \, d\mathcal{H}^2,_&&\text{on }(0,T)\times\Omega,\\
\partial_t_r &= \mu\Delta_r - \operatorname{div}(rw) - \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\int_\Gamma D-A_\, d\mathcal{H}^2 &&\text{on_}(0,T)\times\Omega, \\
\mu\nabla r\cdot n &= D-A_&&\text{on_}(0,T)\times\Gamma, \\
r(0,\cdot) &=_r_0_&&\text{on_}\Omega, \\
\bar_v(0)&=\bar v_0,\\
\int_\Omega r_\,_{{\mathrm d}}x_&=_0\end{aligned}$$ for $\bar v_0=\int_\Omega v_0\,{{\mathrm d}}x/|\Omega|$_and_$r_0=v_0-\bar v_0$, where we used integration by_parts and $w\cdot n=0$_on_$\Gamma$, and where ${\mathcal{H}}^2$_denotes the surface (two-dimensional Hausdorff)_measure. Introducing $$r = c_v\hat{r},\
\bar v=c_v\hat_v$$ as_well as_the P