,$ we use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2}$ to obtain that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If $\alpha\geq 0,$ again using Lemma \[lemkappa\], we have that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq e^{-\alpha\ln \xi}=\xi^{-\alpha}$, and then that: $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alpha}\ln^2\xi.$ We can summarize the two possibilities by writing that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq\xi^{-|\alpha|}\ln^2\xi,$ as soon as $\alpha\geq \beta$ and $\xi$ and $|\alpha|$ sufficiently small. Using the symmetry of $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)$ we can permute $\alpha $ and $\beta$ in the above argument to obtain finally that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=O(\xi^{-\gamma}\ln^2 \xi), $ where $\gamma=\mathrm{max}\{|\alpha|,|\beta|\}.$ We now prove the second claim. By symmetry on $\alpha$ and $\beta$ it suffices to prove the claim for $\alpha\geq \beta.$ As above, we can write that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\theta)\ln^2\xi,$ for some $\theta\in  [-\beta\ln \xi,-\alpha\ln \xi].$ Now, we want to bound $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}$ from below. Since $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}$ is increasing, $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\ln^2\xi.$ If $\beta\geq 0,$ we just use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to obtain that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If $\beta\leq 0,$ we have to compute $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta
, $ we use that $ \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2}$ to obtain that $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If $ \alpha\geq 0,$ again using Lemma \[lemkappa\ ], we have that $ \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq e^{-\alpha\ln \xi}=\xi^{-\alpha}$, and then that: $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alpha}\ln^2\xi.$ We can sum up the two hypothesis by writing that $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq\xi^{-|\alpha|}\ln^2\xi,$ as soon as $ \alpha\geq \beta$ and $ \xi$ and $ |\alpha|$ sufficiently humble. use the symmetry of $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)$ we can permute $ \alpha $ and $ \beta$ in the above argument to prevail last that $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=O(\xi^{-\gamma}\ln^2 \xi), $ where $ \gamma=\mathrm{max}\{|\alpha|,|\beta|\}.$ We now testify the second claim. By symmetry on $ \alpha$ and $ \beta$ it suffice to prove the claim for $ \alpha\geq \beta.$ As above, we can write that $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\theta)\ln^2\xi,$ for some $ \theta\in   [ -\beta\ln \xi,-\alpha\ln \xi].$ Now, we desire to bound $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}$ from below. Since $ \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}$ is increase, $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\ln^2\xi.$ If $ \beta\geq 0,$ we just use that $ \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to receive that $ \Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If $ \beta\leq 0,$ we have to compute $ \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta
,$ we use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\xlpha\ln \xi)\leq \ftax{d\kappe}{d\eta}(0)=\frzc{1}{2}$ to obgain that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\lee \drac{1}{2}\lb^2\xi.$ If $\alpha\geq 0,$ again using Lelma \[lemkqppa\], qe have thef $\frac{d\kappa}{d\sba}(-\alpka\on \xi)\leq e^{-\alphs\ln \xi}=\xi^{-\al[ha}$, and then tvag: $\Lmega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alpha}\ln^2\xi.$ We san sumkagize the two pjssinylitjvs by writing that $\Omega_{\alpha,\befa}(\xi)\leq\qi^{-|\alpha|}\ln^2\xi,$ as sopn as $\alpha\geq \beta$ and $\xi$ and $|\alpha|$ sufficientlj small. Usibg trw symmetry ow $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)$ we dan permute $\alpha $ and $\beta$ in ghe ayove argumebt to mbtain finaoly trat $\Omega_{\alpms,\beta}(\xh)=O(\xi^{-\gamka}\ln^2 \xi), $ where $\gakma=\nathrm{max}\{|\alpha|,|\beta|\}.$ We now prove the secjnd claim. Bv symmetry on $\alpha$ abd $\beta$ it vuffkxes to pcovs the flamm for $\alphz\geq \beta.$ Aw above, we can writt trqt $\Omega_{\alpha,\geta}(\xi)=\srwc{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\theta)\ln^2\xi,$ for some $\theta\in  [-\befa\ln \xi,-\alpha\ln \xi].$ Now, ww want to bound $\Omega_{\wlpha,\beta}$ from below. Since $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}$ is increasing, $\Omaga_{\al'hx,\beua}(\wl)\geq \drwc{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\ln^2\xi.$ If $\beta\geq 0,$ we just tae tmat $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eba}(-\beta\ln\xi)\geq \frac{c\kwplw}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to ubtain thzt $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xl)\geq \frwc{1}{2}\ln^2\xu.$ If $\beta\jeq 0,$ we have to compute $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta
,$ we use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2}$ that \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If 0,$ again using $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln e^{-\alpha\ln \xi}=\xi^{-\alpha}$, and that: $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alpha}\ln^2\xi.$ can summarize the two possibilities by that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq\xi^{-|\alpha|}\ln^2\xi,$ as soon as $\alpha\geq \beta$ and $\xi$ and $|\alpha|$ sufficiently small. the symmetry of $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)$ we can permute $\alpha $ and $\beta$ in the argument obtain that \xi), $ where $\gamma=\mathrm{max}\{|\alpha|,|\beta|\}.$ We now prove the second claim. By symmetry on $\alpha$ and $\beta$ suffices to prove the claim for $\alpha\geq \beta.$ above, we can write $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\theta)\ln^2\xi,$ for some $\theta\in [-\beta\ln \xi].$ we want bound from Since $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}$ is $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\ln^2\xi.$ If $\beta\geq 0,$ we just use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to obtain that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If 0,$ we compute $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta
,$ we use that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alPha\ln \xi)\leq \Frac{d\KapPa}{d\EtA}(0)=\fraC{1}{2}$ to oBtain that $\Omega_{\ALpha,\Beta}(\xi)\leq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If $\alpHa\geq 0,$ AgAIn usINg lemma \[LemkappA\], We HAVe tHaT $\fRac{D\kAPpA}{d\eta}(-\AlpHa\ln \xi)\lEq e^{-\alpha\ln \Xi}=\xI^{-\aLpha}$, and then tHAt: $\omega_{\alpha,\BetA}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alphA}\ln^2\Xi.$ We caN sUmmARize tHe tWo posSibiliTIes by wRiting thaT $\OMEga_{\alpHA,\beta}(\xi)\LEQ\xI^{-|\alpHa|}\ln^2\xi,$ as soon as $\alpHA\gEQ \beta$ and $\xi$ and $|\aLpha|$ suFfICiENTly SmaLl. Using the SyMmetrY Of $\Omega_{\ALpHA,\BEta}(\XI)$ we can permute $\Alpha $ and $\betA$ In tHe abovE aRguMEnt to oBtain FiNAllY that $\Omega_{\aLpha,\Beta}(\xi)=O(\xi^{-\Gamma}\lN^2 \Xi), $ where $\GAmma=\matHrm{max}\{|\AlpHa|,|\bEta|\}.$ WE NoW pRovE tHE seCOnD clAIm. BY symmetrY oN $\aLpha$ aNd $\beTA$ IT SuffIceS to pRove tHe claim for $\alpHa\gEq \beTA.$ As Above, We can WritE tHat $\OmEga_{\alpHa,\betA}(\xI)=\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\ThetA)\ln^2\xi,$ for sOme $\ThEta\In  [-\Beta\lN \Xi,-\alphA\ln \Xi].$ NOw, we wanT to bounD $\omeGa_{\ALPHa,\Beta}$ from below. Since $\FrAC{D\kAppa}{d\eta}$ Is incrEAsInG, $\omega_{\alpHa,\BetA}(\xi)\gEQ \Frac{d\KappA}{D\eTa}(-\beta\ln\Xi)\ln^2\xi.$ iF $\bEtA\geq 0,$ we jUsT use thAt $\FraC{d\kAppa}{d\ETa}(-\beTa\ln\xi)\Geq \frac{d\Kappa}{D\Eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to obtaiN That $\Omega_{\alphA,\BeTA}(\Xi)\GEq \frAc{1}{2}\lN^2\xi.$ If $\beta\leQ 0,$ we hAVe to CompUTe $\FraC{D\kappA}{d\eta
,$ we use that $\frac{d\ka ppa}{d\eta }(-\a lph a\l n\xi) \leq  \frac{d\kappa } {d\e ta}(0)=\frac{1}{2}$ to  obta in that $\ Omega _{\alph a ,\ b e ta} (\ xi )\l eq \f rac{1 }{2 }\ln^2\ xi.$ If $\ alp ha \geq 0,$ aga i nusing Lemm a \ [lemkappa\],  we  haveth at$ \frac {d\ kappa }{d\et a }(-\al pha\ln \x i) \ leq e^ { -\alpha \ l n\xi} =\xi^{-\alpha}$,a nd then that: $\O mega_{ \a l ph a , \be ta} (\xi)\leq\x i^{-\ a lpha}\l n ^2 \ x i .$W e can summari ze the twop oss ibilit ie s b y  writi ng th at $\O mega_{\alph a,\b eta}(\xi) \leq\x i ^{-|\al p ha|}\ln ^2\xi, $ a s s oona s$\ alp ha \ geq \b eta $  an d $\xi$an d$|\al pha| $ s u ffic ien tlysmall . Using the s ymm etry of$\Ome ga_{\ alph a, \beta }(\xi) $ weca n permute $\alp ha $  and $\be ta$  i n t he  abov e  argum ent  to  obtain  finall y  th at $ \ Om ega_{\alpha,\beta} (\ x i )= O(\xi^{- \gamma } \l n^ 2  \xi), $  w her e $\ g a mma=\ math r m{ max}\{|\ alpha| , |\ be ta|\}.$  W e nowpr ove  th e sec o nd c laim.By symme try o n  $\alpha$ and$ \beta$ it suf f ic e s  t o  pro vethe claim f or $ \ alph a\ge q  \ bet a .$ As  abov e, we can write that $\Om eg a_{\al pha,\ beta}(\xi)=\f rac{d\kapp a } { d\eta}(\ thet a )\ l n^2\xi,$ for s ome $ \theta\in[-\beta\ ln \x i,-\alph a\ln \xi] . $  Now, we  wa nttobou n d  $ \Omega_{\alph a , \bet a} $ frombel ow. Sin ce$\f rac {d\ ka ppa}{d\et a}$ is i nc re as in g,$\Ome g a_{\alph a, \be ta }(\ xi)\g e q \fra c{d\k appa }{ d\ e ta} (-\beta \ ln \ x i)\l n^ 2\ xi.$  If  $ \beta \geq 0,$  we jus t use tha t $ \ frac {d \k appa}{d \eta}(-\beta\ ln \xi)\geq \ fr ac{ d\kapp a } {d\eta}( 0)=\frac{1}{2},$ to obt a in that  $\ Omega _{\a lpha,\bet a}( \xi)\g eq\ frac{1 }{2}\l n^2\x i. $ I f $\bet a \ le q 0 ,$  we have t o com pute$\ frac {d\kapp a}{d\eta
,$ we_use that_$\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2}$ to_obtain that_$\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq_\frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$ If_$\alpha\geq_0,$ again using_Lemma \[lemkappa\], we_have that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\alpha\ln \xi)\leq_e^{-\alpha\ln \xi}=\xi^{-\alpha}$, and_then_that: $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq \xi^{-\alpha}\ln^2\xi.$ We can summarize the two possibilities by writing that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\leq\xi^{-|\alpha|}\ln^2\xi,$ as_soon_as $\alpha\geq_\beta$_and_$\xi$ and $|\alpha|$ sufficiently small._Using the symmetry of $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)$_we can_permute $\alpha $ and $\beta$ in the above_argument_to obtain finally_that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=O(\xi^{-\gamma}\ln^2 \xi), $ where $\gamma=\mathrm{max}\{|\alpha|,|\beta|\}.$ We now prove_the second claim. By symmetry on_$\alpha$ and $\beta$_it_suffices_to prove the claim_for $\alpha\geq \beta.$ As above, we_can write that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)=\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(\theta)\ln^2\xi,$ for some_$\theta\in  [-\beta\ln \xi,-\alpha\ln \xi].$ Now, we_want to bound $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}$ from below._Since $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}$ is increasing, $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq_\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\ln^2\xi.$ If_$\beta\geq 0,$ we just use_that $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(-\beta\ln\xi)\geq \frac{d\kappa}{d\eta}(0)=\frac{1}{2},$_to obtain_that $\Omega_{\alpha,\beta}(\xi)\geq \frac{1}{2}\ln^2\xi.$_If $\beta\leq 0,$ we have to_compute $\frac{d\kappa}{d\eta