q+2h)=\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _{1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{aligned}
\omega _{2}(h) &=&(a+b+\delta _{\ast })m_{0}-\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _{1})
\\
&=&\delta _{\ast }m_{0}-\frac{(a+b)m_{0}+q+2d/p_{\ast }}{2h}(q+d+2\theta
_{1})-(q+2d/p_{\ast }).\end{aligned}$$By our choice of $m_{0}$ we have $$\delta _{\ast }m_{0}>q+2d/p_{\ast }$$so, taking $h$ sufficiently large we get $\omega _{2}(h)>0.$ And we also have $\xi _{2}(h)\leq \xi _{3}:=(a+b)m_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast }}%
+\varepsilon _{\ast }$ and $\rho _{h}\leq \varepsilon _{\ast }.$ So we finally get$$d_{m_{0}}(n)\times \theta (n)^{\rho _{h}}\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })}(\delta _{\ast }).  \label{R8'}$$The above inequality guarantees that (\[reg10\]) holds so that we may use Lemma \[REG\]. We take $\eta >\kappa +d$ and, using $(A_{4})$ (see ([R7]{})) we obtain $$\left\vert \mu ^{\eta,\kappa }\right\vert =\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}\frac{%
\psi _{\eta }(x)}{\psi _{\kappa }(y)}P_{t}(x,dy)dx\leq C\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}%
\frac{dx}{\psi _{\kappa -\eta }(x)}<\infty.$$Then, $A(\delta )<C$ (see (\[reg12’\])). One also has $B(\varepsilon
)<\infty $ (see (\[reg12”\])) and finally (see (\[reg11\])) $$C_{h,n_{\ast }}(\varepsilon )\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast }
q+2h)=\rho _ { h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _ { 1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{aligned } 
 \omega _ { 2}(h) & = & (a+b+\delta _ { \ast }) m_{0}-\rho _ { h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _ { 1 }) 
 \\ 
 & = & \delta _ { \ast } m_{0}-\frac{(a+b)m_{0}+q+2d / p_{\ast } } { 2h}(q+d+2\theta 
 _ { 1})-(q+2d / p_{\ast }) .\end{aligned}$$By our choice of $ m_{0}$ we have $ $ \delta _ { \ast } m_{0}>q+2d / p_{\ast } $ $ so, taking $ h$ sufficiently big we make $ \omega _ { 2}(h)>0.$ And we also have $ \xi _ { 2}(h)\leq \xi _ { 3}:=(a+b)m_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast } }% 
 + \varepsilon _ { \ast } $ and $ \rho _ { h}\leq \varepsilon _ { \ast } .$ So we last get$$d_{m_{0}}(n)\times \theta (n)^{\rho _ { h}}\leq Ct^{-\theta _ { 0}\xi _ { 3}}\Phi 
 _ { n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _ { \ast }) } (\delta _ { \ast }).   \label{R8'}$$The above inequality guarantees that (\[reg10\ ]) holds so that we may practice Lemma \[REG\ ]. We take $ \eta > \kappa + d$ and, using $ (A_{4})$ (see ([ R7 ] { }) ) we receive $ $ \left\vert \mu ^{\eta,\kappa } \right\vert = \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}\frac{% 
 \psi _ { \eta } (x)}{\psi _ { \kappa } (y)}P_{t}(x, dy)dx\leq C\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}% 
 \frac{dx}{\psi _ { \kappa -\eta } (x)}<\infty.$$Then, $ A(\delta) < C$ (see (\[reg12’\ ]) ). One also suffer $ B(\varepsilon 
) < \infty $ (see (\[reg12”\ ]) ) and last (determine (\[reg11\ ]) ) $ $ C_{h, n_{\ast } } (\varepsilon) \leq Ct^{-\theta _ { 0}\xi _ { 3}}\Phi 
 _ { n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _ { \ast }
q+2h)=\rjo _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _{1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{xligned}
\omega _{2}(h) &=&(c+v+\delta _{\ast })m_{0}-\dho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\gheta _{1})
\\
&=&\delta _{\ast }m_{0}-\frac{(a+b)m_{0}+q+2d/p_{\adt }}{2h}(q+d+2\tyeta
_{1})-(q+2d/p_{\ast }).\end{aligned}$$Bh our chopce of $m_{0}$ qe heve $$\delta _{\ast }m_{0}>q+2v/l_{\ast }$$so, takinf $h$ sbfhiciently large we get $\omaga _{2}(h)>0.$ And we ansu kave $\xi _{2}(h)\leq \xi _{3}:=(a+b)m_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast }}%
+\varepsylon _{\asy }$ and $\rho _{h}\leq \dareksijon _{\zst }.$ So we finally get$$d_{m_{0}}(n)\times \thefa (n)^{\rho _{h}}\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })}(\depta _{\wst }).  \label{R8'}$$The ablve inequaluty dyarantees thxt (\[reg10\]) holds so that wg may use Lemma \[REG\]. We take $\eta >\yappa +d$ and, usibg $(A_{4})$ (dge ([R7]{})) we obtamn $$\lefn\vert \mu ^{\eta,\kappa }\rigvt\vert =\ont_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}\frac{%
\isi _{\eva }(x)}{\psi _{\kappa }(y)}P_{t}(x,dy)dx\leq C\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}%
\frac{dx}{\ksi _{\kappa -\atc }(x)}<\infty.$$Then, $A(\delta )<C$ (swe (\[rec12’\])). Ona alri hxs $G(\verelsilon
)<\lnfvy $ (see (\[reg12”\])) and finallt (see (\[reg11\])) $$C_{h,n_{\ast }}(\vate[wilon )\leq Ct^{-\tgeta _{0}\xy _{3}}\[hi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast }
q+2h)=\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _{1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{aligned} \omega _{2}(h) &=&(a+b+\delta _{\ast _{1}) &=&\delta _{\ast }}{2h}(q+d+2\theta _{1})-(q+2d/p_{\ast }).\end{aligned}$$By have _{\ast }m_{0}>q+2d/p_{\ast }$$so, $h$ sufficiently large get $\omega _{2}(h)>0.$ And we also $\xi _{2}(h)\leq \xi _{3}:=(a+b)m_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast }}% +\varepsilon _{\ast }$ and $\rho _{h}\leq \varepsilon _{\ast So we finally get$$d_{m_{0}}(n)\times \theta (n)^{\rho _{h}}\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi _{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })}(\delta }). above guarantees (\[reg10\]) holds so that we may use Lemma \[REG\]. We take $\eta >\kappa +d$ and, using (see ([R7]{})) we obtain $$\left\vert \mu ^{\eta,\kappa }\right\vert \psi _{\eta }(x)}{\psi _{\kappa C\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}% \frac{dx}{\psi _{\kappa -\eta }(x)}<\infty.$$Then, )<C$ (\[reg12’\])). One has )<\infty (see (\[reg12”\])) and (see (\[reg11\])) $$C_{h,n_{\ast }}(\varepsilon )\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi _{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast }
q+2h)=\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta _{1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{Aligned}
\omeGa _{2}(h) &=&(a+b+\DelTa _{\aSt })M_{0}-\rho _{H}(q+2h+d+2\Theta _{1})
\\
&=&\delta _{\ast }m_{0}-\FRac{(a+B)m_{0}+q+2d/p_{\ast }}{2h}(q+d+2\theta
_{1})-(q+2d/p_{\ast }).\End{alIgNEd}$$By OUr ChoicE of $m_{0}$ we hAVe $$\DELta _{\AsT }m_{0}>Q+2d/p_{\AsT }$$So, TakinG $h$ sUfficieNtly large wE geT $\oMega _{2}(h)>0.$ And we alSO hAve $\xi _{2}(h)\leq \xI _{3}:=(a+b)M_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast }}%
+\vArePsilon _{\AsT }$ anD $\Rho _{h}\lEq \vArepsIlon _{\asT }.$ so we fiNally get$$d_{M_{0}}(n)\TImes \thETa (n)^{\rho _{h}}\LEQ CT^{-\theTa _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilON _{\aST })}(\delta _{\ast }).  \label{r8'}$$The abOvE InEQUalIty Guarantees ThAt (\[reg10\]) HOlds so tHAt WE MAy uSE Lemma \[REG\]. We taKe $\eta >\kappa +d$ ANd, uSing $(A_{4})$ (sEe ([r7]{})) we OBtain $$\lEft\veRt \MU ^{\etA,\kappa }\right\Vert =\Int_{{\mathbb{r}}^{2}}\frac{%
\pSI _{\eta }(x)}{\psI _{\Kappa }(y)}P_{T}(x,dy)dx\Leq c\inT_{{\matHBb{r}}}%
\fRac{Dx}{\PSi _{\kAPpA -\etA }(X)}<\inFty.$$Then, $A(\DeLtA )<C$ (see (\[Reg12’\])). ONE ALSo haS $B(\vArepSilon
)<\Infty $ (see (\[reg12”\])) anD fiNallY (See (\[Reg11\])) $$C_{h,N_{\ast }}(\vArepSiLon )\leQ Ct^{-\theTa _{0}\xi _{3}}\PHi
_{N}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast }
q+2h)=\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\t heta _{1}+ m_{0} (a+ b)) $$ and$ $\be gin{aligned}
\ o mega  _{2}(h) &=&(a+b+\delt a _{\ as t  })m _ {0 }-\rh o _{h}( q +2 h + d+2 \t he ta_{ 1 }) 
\\
& =&\ delta _ {\ast }m_{ 0}- \f rac{(a+b)m_{ 0 }+ q+2d/p_{\a st}}{2h}(q+d+2 \th eta
_{ 1} )-( q +2d/p _{\ ast } ).\end { aligne d}$$By ou rc hoiceo f $m_{0 } $  w e ha ve $$\delta _{\as t  } m _{0}>q+2d/p_{\ ast }$ $s o ,t a kin g $ h$ suffici en tly l a rge weg et $ \ ome g a _{2}(h)>0.$  And we als o  ha ve $\x i_{2 } (h)\le q \xi  _ { 3}: =(a+b)m_{0} +q+\ frac{2d}{ p_{\as t  }}%
+\ v arepsil on _{\ ast  }$  and $\ rh o _ {h } \le q  \ var e psi lon _{\a st  } .$ So  wef i n a llyget $$d_ {m_{0 }}(n)\times \ the ta ( n )^{ \rho_{h}} \leq  C t^{-\ theta_{0}\ xi  _{3}}\Phi
_{n} ^{m_ {0}(1+\va rep si lon  _ {\ast })}(\d elt a _ {\ast } ).  \la b el{ R8 ' } $ $T he above inequalit yg u ar antees t hat (\ [ re g1 0 \]) hold ssothat w e may  use Le mma \[RE G\]. W e  t ak e $\eta  > \kappa  + d$and , usi n g $( A_{4}) $ (see ( [R7]{ } )) we obtain $ $ \left\vert \m u  ^ { \ et a ,\ka ppa  }\right\ve rt = \ int_ {{\m a th bb{ R }}^{2 }}\fr ac { %\ psi _{\eta }(x)}{\p si  _{\ka ppa } (y)}P_{t}(x,d y)dx\leq C \ i n t_{{\mat hbb{ R }} } %
\frac{dx}{\p si _{ \kappa -\e t a }(x)}< \inft y.$$Then , $A(\del t a  )<C$ (s ee(\[ reg 12’ \ ] )) . One also ha s $B(\ va repsilo n
) <\infty  $(se e ( \[r eg 12”\])) a nd final ly  ( se e(\[ reg11 \ ])) $$C_ {h ,n_ {\ ast  }}(\ v arepsi lon ) \leq  C t^ { -\t heta _{ 0 }\ x i  _{3 }} \P hi
_ {n} ^{ m_{0} (1+\ v are psilon_{\ast }
q+2h)=\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta__{1}+m_{0}(a+b))$$and$$\begin{aligned}
\omega _{2}(h)_&=&(a+b+\delta _{\ast })m_{0}-\rho _{h}(q+2h+d+2\theta__{1})
\\
&=&\delta _{\ast_}m_{0}-\frac{(a+b)m_{0}+q+2d/p_{\ast_}}{2h}(q+d+2\theta
_{1})-(q+2d/p_{\ast }).\end{aligned}$$By_our_choice of $m_{0}$_we have $$\delta__{\ast }m_{0}>q+2d/p_{\ast }$$so, taking_$h$ sufficiently large_we_get $\omega _{2}(h)>0.$ And we also have $\xi _{2}(h)\leq \xi _{3}:=(a+b)m_{0}+q+\frac{2d}{p_{\ast }}%
+\varepsilon _{\ast }$_and_$\rho _{h}\leq_\varepsilon__{\ast_}.$ So we finally get$$d_{m_{0}}(n)\times_\theta (n)^{\rho _{h}}\leq Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi__{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast_})}(\delta _{\ast }).  \label{R8'}$$The above inequality guarantees_that_(\[reg10\]) holds so_that we may use Lemma \[REG\]. We take $\eta_>\kappa +d$ and, using $(A_{4})$ (see_([R7]{})) we obtain_$$\left\vert_\mu_^{\eta,\kappa }\right\vert =\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}\frac{%
\psi _{\eta_}(x)}{\psi _{\kappa }(y)}P_{t}(x,dy)dx\leq C\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}%
\frac{dx}{\psi _{\kappa -\eta_}(x)}<\infty.$$Then, $A(\delta )<C$ (see (\[reg12’\])). One_also has $B(\varepsilon
)<\infty $ (see (\[reg12”\])) and_finally (see (\[reg11\])) $$C_{h,n_{\ast }}(\varepsilon )\leq_Ct^{-\theta _{0}\xi _{3}}\Phi
_{n}^{m_{0}(1+\varepsilon _{\ast }