 equal the initial input velocity). Fig. \[fig:omega\] illustrates the acceleration of the output shaft $\omega_2$ towards a synchronous speed with the input shaft. The figure clearly illustrates the discrepancy between the measured shifting time $y_l$ and corresponding simulation $Y_l$.

[.45]{}

\[fig:torque\]

[.45]{}

\[fig:omega\]

Practical set-up
----------------

The test set-up considered for this paper is depicted in Fig. \[testbench\]. An AC electric motor ($30$ ) is controlled to a constant speed via a high bandwidth motor drive. The motor is connected to a controlled transmission via a torque converter. Within this transmission, the clutch can be controlled to engage with the proper gear. Furthermore, the output shaft of the clutch is connected to a load transmission. The load consists of a flywheel ($2,5$ ) and a brake. This system was previously used to study smooth gearbox controllers [@bruno2011].

![Wet clutch test bench[]{data-label="testbench"}](test_bench){width="0.6\columnwidth"}

Design of experiments
---------------------

We experimentally tested the influence of several control and operating conditions on the shifting time $y_l$ on the wet clutch test set-up. We performed an up-shift from neutral to first gear for various control parameters and conditions, spanning a test scenario space. More specifically, 18 distinct feedforward control signals were tested. We compared 3 different values for $\Delta t$ and $u_0$ and 2 values for $\Delta u$. Further we verified 3 different motor speeds $\omega_m$ (1200, 1350 and 1500 ) and 2 different friction load conditions $T_b$ (low, high). For these, a full factorial design of $l\in\{1,\cdots,108\}$ experiments has been tested. As an illustration of the modeling deficiency, we compare the actual measurements, $y_l$, with the simulated shifting times, $Y_l$, in Fig. \[fig:experiments\]. The global trend is captured by the deterministic model, however a distinct discrepancy between measurements and simulation is present.

Parametric uncertainty model {#sec:parametric_UM}
----------------------------

The objective of this research is to associate and identify a probabilistic model for several of the lumped model parameters. As mentioned in section \[sec:model&exp\], several of these
equal the initial input velocity). Fig. \[fig: omega\ ] illustrates the acceleration of the output diaphysis $ \omega_2 $ towards a synchronous focal ratio with the input shaft. The figure distinctly illustrates the discrepancy between the measured shift prison term $ y_l$ and corresponding model $ Y_l$. 

 [ .45 ] { } 

 \[fig: torque\ ] 

 [ .45 ] { } 

 \[fig: omega\ ] 

 Practical set - up 
 ---------------- 

 The examination set - up considered for this newspaper is portray in Fig. \[testbench\ ]. An AC electric motor ($ 30 $) is controlled to a constant speed via a high bandwidth motor drive. The motor is get in touch to a controlled transmission via a torque converter. Within this infection, the clutch can be controlled to engage with the proper gear. Furthermore, the end product shaft of the clutch is connected to a load transmission. The lode consists of a flywheel ($ 2,5 $) and a brake. This system was previously used to study smooth gearbox controllers [ @bruno2011 ]. 

! [ Wet clutch test bench[]{data - label="testbench"}](test_bench){width="0.6\columnwidth " } 

 Design of experiments 
 --------------------- 

 We experimentally tested the influence of several control and operating conditions on the shifting time $ y_l$ on the wet clasp test set - up. We do an astir - shift from neutral to first gearing for various restraint parameters and conditions, cross a test scenario space. More specifically, 18 distinct feedforward control signals were tested. We compared 3 different values for $ \Delta t$ and $ u_0 $ and 2 values for $ \Delta u$. Further we verified 3 unlike motor speeds $ \omega_m$ (1200, 1350 and 1500) and 2 unlike friction load conditions $ T_b$ (low, high). For these, a full factorial invention of $ l\in\{1,\cdots,108\}$ experiments has been tested. As an illustration of the mold deficiency, we compare the actual measurements, $ y_l$, with the simulated shifting time, $ Y_l$, in Fig. \[fig: experiments\ ]. The global trend is captured by the deterministic model, however a distinct discrepancy between measurement and simulation is present. 

 Parametric uncertainty model { # sec: parametric_UM } 
 ---------------------------- 

 The objective of this inquiry is to associate and identify a probabilistic model for respective of the lumped model parameters. As mentioned in section \[sec: model&exp\ ], several of these
 eqkal the initial input veuocity). Fig. \[fig:omega\] ilnustrafes the xcceleration of the output siaft $\omegq_2$ towards a synchronour speed wpth the ibput whaft. The hjgure clearly llluscretes the discrekancy betweet the measured sfiyting time $y_l$ and corresponding simujation $U_l$.

[.45]{}

\[vig:torque\]

[.45]{}

\[fig:omgga\]

Prssticzl set-up
----------------

The test set-up considered ror thiv paper is delicted in Fig. \[testbench\]. An AC flectric motor ($30$ ) id controllee to q constant soeed via a high bandwisth motor drive. The motor is covnectzd to a conjxillfg transmissmon viw a torque converter. Within this transmisxioi, thw clutch can be contrmlled to engage wijh the pro[ex gear. Furthermore, thw iutpuj shaxt ow thd cmuvch is cojnerted to a lkad transmiwsion. The load consosew of a flywhesl ($2,5$ ) agd a brake. This system was previously useg tk study smooth gearbox xontrollers [@bruno2011].

![Wet flutch teft bench[]{data-label="testbench"}](test_bench){width="0.6\columnwiddh"}

Desmgv oy expefumfnts
---------------------

We experimentally tested the influence of aefegal control and oierating conditionx ln jhe shifting tkme $y_l$ on the wet clutch tedt set-uk. We pwrformed wn ul-shift from neutral to firsr gear for vcriius control paramecers and conbitionx, spamning a test scenario s'ace. Mkre specififally, 18 diaginct feedforwara cpndrol signals were tested. Wq comparev 3 diyferent xalugs for $\Qelta t$ anf $u_0$ akg 2 values for $\Deltw u$. Forther we verififd 3 different motor speeds $\omege_k$ (1200, 1350 and 1500 ) anc 2 dixferent yrictipn load condieions $T_b$ (low, hngh). For chese, x full facnorial devign of $l\in\{1,\sdots,108\}$ experimajts has been tested. Ws ab iloustratkun of the modeking defibitncy, we conpare the actual mcasurgmsnts, $y_l$, with thz wimulated shiftong tiied, $B_l$, in Xig. \[fig:experhmengs\]. Gne glubal trtud ls zaptired by the determinhstid model, however a ciftinct duscrepansy between messurements and simklatimn ms prexenj.

Parametric uncertainty model {#ssc:parametgic_MM}
----------------------------

The objectide on thys researck is to associate and identify a probabioistic model for swveral of the lumpeb kodel paramxters. Ws mentioted in section \[sec:moeel&exp\], several of these
equal the initial input velocity). Fig. \[fig:omega\] acceleration the output $\omega_2$ towards a shaft. figure clearly illustrates discrepancy between the shifting time $y_l$ and corresponding simulation [.45]{} \[fig:torque\] [.45]{} \[fig:omega\] Practical set-up ---------------- The test set-up considered for this is depicted in Fig. \[testbench\]. An AC electric motor ($30$ ) is controlled a speed a bandwidth motor drive. The motor is connected to a controlled transmission via a torque converter. Within transmission, the clutch can be controlled to engage the proper gear. Furthermore, output shaft of the clutch connected a load The consists a flywheel ($2,5$ and a brake. This system was previously used to study smooth gearbox controllers [@bruno2011]. ![Wet clutch test Design of We experimentally the of control and operating the shifting time $y_l$ on the set-up. We performed an up-shift from neutral to gear for control parameters and conditions, spanning a scenario space. More specifically, 18 distinct feedforward control were tested. We compared 3 different values for $\Delta t$ and $u_0$ and 2 values u$. Further we verified different motor speeds (1200, and ) 2 different load conditions $T_b$ (low, high). For these, a full factorial design $l\in\{1,\cdots,108\}$ experiments has been tested. As an illustration of the we the actual measurements, with the simulated shifting $Y_l$, Fig. \[fig:experiments\]. The global captured the a discrepancy measurements and simulation is Parametric uncertainty model {#sec:parametric_UM} ---------------------------- objective of this research a probabilistic model for several of the lumped parameters. As mentioned in section \[sec:model&exp\], several these
 equal the initial input velocIty). Fig. \[fig:oMega\] iLluStrAtEs thE accEleration of the OUtpuT shaft $\omega_2$ towards a synChronOuS SpeeD WiTh the Input shAFt. tHE fiGuRe CleArLY iLlustRatEs the diScrepancy bEtwEeN the measured SHiFting time $y_L$ anD correspondiNg sImulatIoN $Y_l$.

[.45]{}

\[FIg:torQue\]

[.45]{}

\[Fig:omEga\]

PraCTical sEt-up
----------------

The teSt SEt-up coNSidered FOR tHis pAper is depicted in FIG. \[tEStbench\]. An AC eleCtric mOtOR ($30$ ) iS COntRolLed to a consTaNt speED via a hiGH bANDWidTH motor drive. ThE motor is conNEctEd to a cOnTroLLed traNsmisSiON viA a torque conVertEr. Within tHis traNSmissioN, The clutCh can bE coNtrOlleD To EnGagE wITh tHE pRopER geAr. FurtheRmOrE, the oUtpuT SHAFt of The ClutCh is cOnnected to a loAd tRansMIssIon. ThE load ConsIsTs of a FlywheEl ($2,5$ ) and A bRake. This system wAs prEviously uSed To StuDy SmootH GearboX coNtrOllers [@bRuno2011].

![Wet CLutCh TEST bEnch[]{data-label="testbEnCH"}](TeSt_bench){wIdth="0.6\coLUmNwIDth"}

DesigN oF exPeriMENts
---------------------

We ExpeRImEntally tEsted tHE iNfLuence oF sEveral CoNtrOl aNd opeRAtinG condiTions on tHe shiFTing time $y_l$ on thE Wet clutch test SEt-UP. we PErfoRmeD an up-shift fRom nEUtraL to fIRsT geAR for vAriouS cONtROl parameters and condItIons, spAnninG a test scenariO space. More SPECificallY, 18 disTInCT feedforward coNtrol Signals werE Tested. We CompaRed 3 diffeRent valueS FOr $\Delta t$ And $U_0$ anD 2 vaLueS FOr $\delta u$. Further WE VeriFiEd 3 diffeRenT motor sPeeDs $\oMegA_m$ (1200, 1350 aNd 1500 ) And 2 differEnt frictIoN lOaD cOndItionS $t_b$ (low, higH). FOr tHeSe, a Full fACtoriaL desiGn of $L\iN\{1,\cDOts,108\}$ ExperimENtS HAs beEn TeSted. as aN iLlustRatiON of The modeLing deficIenCY, we cOmPaRe the acTual measuremeNtS, $y_l$, with the SiMulAted shIFTing timeS, $Y_l$, in Fig. \[fig:experiments\]. THE global TreNd is cAptuRed by the dEteRminisTic MOdel, hoWever a DistiNcT diSCRepanCY BeTweEn MeasuremenTS And SimulAtIon iS presenT.

Parametric uncertaINty Model {#sec:paramEtrIc_UM}
----------------------------

tHE oBjeCTiVE of ThIS reSEArch is to associaTe and identIfY A pRobabilistIC moDeL for sevEral of tHe lumPEd model ParameterS. As mentioNeD in sECTioN \[sec:model&eXp\], severaL of these
 equal the initial input v elocity).Fig.\[f ig: om ega\ ] il lustrates thea ccel eration of the outputshaft  $ \ omeg a _2 $ tow ards as yn c h ron ou sspe ed wi th th e i nput sh aft. The f igu re  clearly ill u st rates thedis crepancy bet wee n theme asu r ed sh ift ing t ime $y _ l$ and  correspo nd i ng sim u lation$ Y _l $.
[.45]{}

\[fig:to r qu e \]

[.45]{}

\ [fig:o me g a\ ] 
Pr act ical set-u p----- - ------- - -- T het est set-up co nsidered fo r  th is pap er  is depict ed in  F i g.\[testbench \].An AC ele ctricm otor ($ 3 0$ ) is  contr oll edto a co ns tan ts pee d  v iaa  hi gh bandw id th  moto r dr i v e .  The  mo toris co nnected to acon trol l edtrans missi on v ia  a to rque c onver te r. Within thistran smission,  th eclu tc h can be con tro lle d to en gage wi t h t he p r op er gear. Furthermo re , th e output  shaft of  t h e clutch  i s c onne c t ed to  a l o ad  transmi ssion. Th eload co ns ists o fa f lyw heel( $2,5 $ ) an d a brak e. Th i s system was p r eviously used to s tu d y sm oot h gearbox c ontr o ller s [@ b ru no2 0 11].
![We tc lu t ch test bench[]{dat a- label= "test bench"}](test _bench){wi d t h ="0.6\co lumn w id t h"}

Design of  expe riments
-- - -------- ----- -----

W e experim e n tally te ste d t heinf l u en ce of several c ontr ol  and op era ting co ndi tio nsonth e shiftin g time $ y_ l$  o nthe  wetc lutch te st  se t- up.  We p e rforme d anup-s hi ft fro m neutr a lt o  fir st  g earfor  v ariou s co n tro l param eters and  co n diti on s,  spanni ng a test sce na rio space.  M ore  speci f i cally, 1 8 distinct feedforwardc ontrolsig nalswere  tested.Wecompar ed3  diffe rent v alues  f or$ \ Delta t $and  $ u_0$ and 2 v alu es fo r$\De lta u$.  Further we verifi e d 3  different mo tor  spe e d s$\o m eg a _m$  ( 1 200 , 1350 and 1500 )  and 2 dif fe r en t friction loa dconditi ons $T_ b$ (l o w, high ). For th ese, a fu ll  fac t o ria l design o f $l\in\ {1,\cdots , 108\} $  e xperi men ts has  b een  test ed. As anillus tratio nof the  mode li ng defic iency, we compare the a ctualmeasu rem ents, $y_ l$, wit h the sim ulat ed shiftin g t ime s, $Y _l$ ,  in F ig.\ [f ig: e xperi ment s \]. The g l ob alt r en d is captur e d bythe d ete r minist ic m odel, however a d i stinct discrep ancy b etw een meas ur ements and sim ula ti o n  is pres en t.

Paramet ric unce rt a intymodel{#sec: paramet r i c_ U M}
--- ---- --- --------- --- -- - ---

Th eob j ective  ofth is res earchi s to a ssociate and ide ntify a  prob a bil istic  m odel fo r  sev eral of th e lumped mo del pa rame ters.  As men ti oned i n s ec tion \[sec : model&exp \], s everalof  the se
 equal_the initial_input velocity). Fig. \[fig:omega\]_illustrates the_acceleration_of the_output_shaft $\omega_2$ towards_a synchronous speed_with the input shaft._The figure clearly_illustrates_the discrepancy between the measured shifting time $y_l$ and corresponding simulation $Y_l$.

[.45]{}

\[fig:torque\]

[.45]{}

\[fig:omega\]

Practical set-up
----------------

The test_set-up_considered for_this_paper_is depicted in Fig. \[testbench\]._An AC electric motor ($30$_) is_controlled to a constant speed via a high_bandwidth_motor drive. The_motor is connected to a controlled transmission via a_torque converter. Within this transmission, the_clutch can be_controlled_to_engage with the proper_gear. Furthermore, the output shaft of_the clutch is connected to a_load transmission. The load consists of a_flywheel ($2,5$ ) and a brake._This system was previously used_to study_smooth gearbox controllers [@bruno2011].

![Wet clutch_test bench[]{data-label="testbench"}](test_bench){width="0.6\columnwidth"}

Design of_experiments
---------------------

We experimentally_tested the influence_of several control and operating conditions_on the shifting_time $y_l$ on the wet clutch_test_set-up. We performed_an_up-shift_from neutral_to first gear_for_various control_parameters_and conditions, spanning a test scenario_space._More specifically, 18 distinct feedforward control signals_were tested. We compared_3_different values for $\Delta_t$ and $u_0$ and 2_values for $\Delta u$. Further we_verified 3_different motor_speeds $\omega_m$ (1200, 1350 and 1500 ) and 2 different friction_load conditions $T_b$ (low, high). For_these, a full factorial_design of_$l\in\{1,\cdots,108\}$_experiments has been_tested._As an_illustration of the modeling deficiency, we compare_the actual_measurements, $y_l$, with the simulated shifting_times, $Y_l$, in Fig._\[fig:experiments\]._The global trend is captured by_the deterministic model, however a distinct_discrepancy between measurements and simulation_is_present.

Parametric_uncertainty model {#sec:parametric_UM}
----------------------------

The objective of_this research is to associate and_identify a probabilistic_model for several of the lumped model_parameters._As mentioned in section \[sec:model&exp\], several_of_these