=E-v_0,\ \delta=(V_1-V_2)/2,\ v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing the length scale $l=\hbar v_{F}/\gamma_{1}$, which represents the inter-layer coupling length, allows us to define the following dimensionless quantities:$$\begin{aligned}
\epsilon\rightarrow\frac{\epsilon}{\gamma_1},\ v_0\rightarrow\frac{v_0}{\gamma_1},\ \delta\rightarrow\frac{\delta}{\gamma_1},\ k_y\rightarrow lk_y,\ \text{and}\ \vec r\rightarrow\frac{\vec r}{l}.
\label{dimensionless}\end{aligned}$$ Notice that for the two stacking configurations, $\gamma_{1}$ was found to be different. For the AB-BL the value is $\gamma_1\approx0.4$ eV while for AA-BL it is $\gamma_1\approx0.2$ eV[@li2009band; @AA-gamma1; @AA-Yuehua2010].

![(Colour online) Different geometries for bilayer and two decoupled graphene layer interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission probabilities. (a) AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene sandwiched between two SL garaphene layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL leads with 2SL as intermediate region (AB-2SL-AB), (c) two single gaphene layers connected to AB-BL(2SL-AB), and (d) similar to (b) but now with AA-BL as the leads with two upper (red)-lower (blue) shifted Dirac cones (AA-2SL-AA). (e) left and right leads are bilayer graphene with different stacking connected to the two decoupled graphene sheets (AA-2SL-AB). The possible transmission processes between the different conduction channel are indicated above the respective junctions. []{data-label="intro-fig02"}](trans-channels1.pdf "fig:"){width="3.6"}\
![(Colour online) Different geometries for bilayer and two decoupled graphene layer interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission probabilities. (a) AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene sandwiched between two SL garaphene layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL leads with 2SL as intermediate region (AB-2SL-AB), (c
= E - v_0,\ \delta=(V_1 - V_2)/2,\ v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing the length scale $ l=\hbar v_{F}/\gamma_{1}$, which represents the inter - layer yoke duration, allows us to define the following dimensionless quantities:$$\begin{aligned } 
 \epsilon\rightarrow\frac{\epsilon}{\gamma_1},\ v_0\rightarrow\frac{v_0}{\gamma_1},\ \delta\rightarrow\frac{\delta}{\gamma_1},\ k_y\rightarrow lk_y,\ \text{and}\ \vec r\rightarrow\frac{\vec r}{l }. 
 \label{dimensionless}\end{aligned}$$ detect that for the two stacking shape, $ \gamma_{1}$ was found to be different. For the AB - BL the value is $ \gamma_1\approx0.4 $ eV while for AA - BL it is $ \gamma_1\approx0.2 $ eV[@li2009band; @AA - gamma1; @AA - Yuehua2010 ]. 

! [ (color online) Different geometries for bilayer and two decoupled graphene level interface with schematic theatrical performance of the transmission probabilities. (a) AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene sandwiched between two shining path garaphene layers (2SL - AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB - BL leads with 2SL as average region (AB-2SL - AB), (c) two individual gaphene layer connected to AB - BL(2SL - AB), and (d) similar to (b) but immediately with AA - BL as the leads with two upper (red)-lower (blue) shifted Dirac cones (AA-2SL - AA). (e) leave and right leads are bilayer graphene with different stacking connected to the two decoupled graphene sheet (AA-2SL - AB). The possible transmission processes between the different conduction channel are indicated above the respective junctions. [ ] { data - label="intro - fig02"}](trans - channels1.pdf " fig:"){width="3.6"}\ 
! [ (Colour online) Different geometries for bilayer and two decoupled graphene layer interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission probability. (a) AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene sandwiched between two shining path garaphene level (2SL - AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB - BL lead with 2SL as intermediate region (AB-2SL - AB), (hundred
=E-v_0,\ \felta=(V_1-V_2)/2,\ v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing uhe length scale $l=\hbar v_{H}/\gamma_{1}$, shich reoresents the inter-layer couppibg lebgth, allows us to defive the foplowing eimeisionless quantivjes:$$\begik{clignsf}
\epsnlin\rightarrow\frsc{\epsilon}{\gdmma_1},\ v_0\rightarrmw\wrcc{v_0}{\gamma_1},\ \delta\rightarrow\frac{\delta}{\gamia_1},\ k_y\ribhharrow lk_y,\ \texj{and}\ \nes r\rjghtarrow\frac{\vec r}{l}.
\label{dimensionlsss}\end{anigned}$$ Notice that for the two stacking convigurations, $\gamma_{1}$ aas found ti be eifferent. Fof the AB-BL the value ia $\gamma_1\approx0.4$ eV while for AA-BL it ix $\gamma_1\apptos0.2$ fE[@li2009band; @AA-gemma1; @AW-Yuehua2010].

![(Colouv onlina) Diffetent geometriex fmr vilayer and two decou'led graphene layer ynterfacev cith schematic represwnratiot of the rravsmjsxikn prohabmlities. (a) AZ or AB staxking bilayer graphtne wandwiched befween ewj SL garaphene layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL ltads sith 2SL as intermediate region (AB-2SL-AB), (c) two dingle ga[hene layers connected to AB-BL(2SL-AB), and (d) similar do (b) uug niw dutj AA-BL as the leads with two upper (red)-lower (bjhe) smifted Dirac concs (AA-2SL-AA). (e) left amd rodht leads are bilayzd fraphene with difffrent sjackint connecttd to the two decoupled graphene sheets (AA-2SL-CB). Rhe possible translission proeesses betwren the different conduetion dhannel are indicates above the respeztine jgnctions. []{data-label="intro-fig02"}](erans-chaniels1.pbf "fig:"){wiath="3.6"}\
![(Cplour jnline) Difverenb geometries for bipayer atd two declupled graphene layer interfaces with schematoc reiresentatnon of the transmisfion probabilijies. (a) AA or AC stacking bilayec graphene swndwiched betfgen two SL gacaphene lwyerw (2SL-QA(AB)-2SL), (c) AB-BL leads wiyh 2SL as pnuermediate region (AB-2SL-AB), (c
=E-v_0,\ \delta=(V_1-V_2)/2,\ v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing the length scale which the inter-layer length, allows us quantities:$$\begin{aligned} v_0\rightarrow\frac{v_0}{\gamma_1},\ \delta\rightarrow\frac{\delta}{\gamma_1},\ k_y\rightarrow \text{and}\ \vec r\rightarrow\frac{\vec \label{dimensionless}\end{aligned}$$ Notice that for the two configurations, $\gamma_{1}$ was found to be different. For the AB-BL the value is eV while for AA-BL it is $\gamma_1\approx0.2$ eV[@li2009band; @AA-gamma1; @AA-Yuehua2010]. ![(Colour online) Different for and decoupled layer interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission probabilities. (a) AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene between two SL garaphene layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL with 2SL as intermediate (AB-2SL-AB), (c) two single gaphene connected AB-BL(2SL-AB), and similar (b) now with AA-BL the leads with two upper (red)-lower (blue) shifted Dirac cones (AA-2SL-AA). (e) left and right leads are graphene with connected to two graphene (AA-2SL-AB). The possible between the different conduction channel are respective junctions. []{data-label="intro-fig02"}](trans-channels1.pdf "fig:"){width="3.6"}\ ![(Colour online) Different geometries bilayer and decoupled graphene layer interfaces with schematic of the transmission probabilities. (a) AA or AB bilayer graphene sandwiched between two SL garaphene layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL leads with 2SL as (AB-2SL-AB), (c
=E-v_0,\ \delta=(V_1-V_2)/2,\ v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing thE length scaLe $l=\hbAr v_{f}/\gaMmA_{1}$, whiCh rePresents the intER-layEr coupling length, allows Us to dEfINe thE FoLlowiNg dimenSIoNLEss QuAnTitIeS:$$\BeGin{alIgnEd}
\epsilOn\rightarrOw\fRaC{\epsilon}{\gammA_1},\ V_0\rIghtarrow\fRac{V_0}{\gamma_1},\ \delta\rIghTarrow\FrAc{\dELta}{\gaMma_1},\ K_y\rigHtarroW Lk_y,\ \texT{and}\ \vec r\rIgHTarrow\FRac{\vec r}{L}.
\LAbEl{diMensionless}\end{aliGNeD}$$ notice that for tHe two sTaCKiNG ConFigUrations, $\gaMmA_{1}$ was fOUnd to be DIfFEREnt. fOr the AB-BL the vAlue is $\gamma_1\APprOx0.4$ eV whIlE foR aA-BL it Is $\gamMa_1\APprOx0.2$ eV[@li2009band; @Aa-gamMa1; @AA-YuehuA2010].

![(ColouR Online) DIFferent GeometRieS foR bilAYeR aNd tWo DEcoUPlEd gRAphEne layer InTeRfaceS witH SCHEmatIc rEpreSentaTion of the tranSmiSsioN ProBabilIties. (A) AA oR Ab stacKing biLayer GrAphene sandwicheD betWeen two SL GarApHenE lAyers (2sl-AA(AB)-2Sl), (b) Ab-BL Leads wiTh 2SL as iNTerMeDIATe Region (AB-2SL-AB), (c) two siNgLE GaPhene layErs conNEcTeD To AB-BL(2SL-aB), And (D) simILAr to (b) But nOW wIth AA-BL aS the leADs WiTh two upPeR (red)-loWeR (blUe) sHifteD diraC cones (aA-2SL-AA). (e) lEft anD Right leads are bILayer graphene WItH DIfFErenT stAcking conneCted TO the Two dECoUplED grapHene sHeETs (aa-2SL-AB). The possible traNsMissioN procEsses between tHe differenT CONduction ChanNEl ARe indicated aboVe the Respective JUnctions. []{Data-lAbel="intrO-fig02"}](trans-CHAnnels1.pdF "fiG:"){wiDth="3.6"}\
![(colOUR oNline) DifferenT GEomeTrIes for bIlaYer and tWo dEcoUplEd gRaPhene layeR interfaCeS wItH sCheMatic REpresentAtIon Of The TransMIssion ProbaBiliTiEs. (A) aA oR AB stacKInG BIlayEr GrApheNe sAnDwichEd beTWeeN two SL gAraphene lAyeRS (2SL-Aa(Ab)-2Sl), (b) AB-BL lEads with 2SL as iNtErmediate rEgIon (aB-2SL-AB), (C
=E-v_0,\ \delta=(V_1-V_2)/ 2,\ v_0=(V _1+V_ 2)/ 2$.  I ntro duci ng the lengths cale  $l=\hbar v_{F}/\gamma _{1}$ ,w hich re prese nts the in t e r-l ay er  co up l in g len gth , allow s us to de fin ethe followin g  d imensionle ssquantities:$ $\b egin{a li gne d }
\ep sil on\ri ghtarr o w\frac {\epsilon }{ \ gamma_ 1 },\ v_0 \ r ig htar row\frac{v_0}{\ga m ma _ 1},\ \delta\ri ghtarr ow \ fr a c {\d elt a}{\gamma_ 1} ,\ k_ y \righta r ro w l k_y , \ \text{and}\  \vec r\rig h tar row\fr ac {\v e c r}{l }.
\l ab e l{d imensionles s}\e nd{aligne d}$$ N o tice th a t for t he two  st ack ingc on fi gur at i ons ,  $ \ga m ma_ {1}$ was  f ou nd to  bed i f f eren t.Forthe A B-BL the valu e i s $\ g amm a_1\a pprox 0.4$  e V whi le for  AA-B Lit is $\gamma_1 \app rox0.2$ e V[@ li 200 9b and;@ AA-gam ma1 ; @ AA-Yueh ua2010] . 

! [( C o l ou r online) Differen tg e om etries f or bil a ye ra nd two d ec oup ledg r aphen e la y er  interfa ces wi t hsc hematic  r eprese nt ati onof th e  tra nsmiss ion prob abili t ies. (a) AA or AB stacking b i la y e rg raph ene  sandwiched  bet w eentwoS Lgar a phene  laye rs (2 S L-AA(AB)-2SL), (b)AB -BL le ads w ith 2SL as in termediate r e gion (AB -2SL - AB ) , (c) two sing le ga phene laye r s connec ted t o AB-BL( 2SL-AB),a n d (d) si mil arto(b) b ut  now with AA- B L  asth e leads  wi th twoupp er(re d)- lo wer (blue ) shifte dDi ra ccon es (A A -2SL-AA) .(e)  l eft  andr ight l eadsarebi la y ergraphen e  w i t h di ff er entsta ck ing c onne c ted  to the  two deco upl e d gr ap he ne shee ts (AA-2SL-AB ).  The possi bl e t ransmi s s ion proc esses between the diffe r ent con duc tionchan nel are i ndi catedabo v e therespec tiveju nct i o ns. [ ] { da ta- la bel="intro - f ig0 2"}]( tr ans- channel s1.pdf "fig:"){wid t h=" 3.6"}\
![(Col our  onl i n e)  Di f fe r ent  g e ome t r ies for bilayer  and two d ec o up led graphe n e l ay er inte rfaceswiths chemati c represe ntation o fthet r ans mission pr obabilit ies. (a)A A orA Bstack ing  bilay er  gr aphen e sand w ich ed be tweentw o SL g araph en e layers  (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b)AB-BLleads  wi th 2SL as  in t erm ediate re gion  (AB-2SL-A B),  (c 
=E-v_0,\ \delta=(V_1-V_2)/2,\_v_0=(V_1+V_2)/2$. Introducing_the length scale $l=\hbar_v_{F}/\gamma_{1}$, which_represents_the inter-layer_coupling_length, allows us_to define the_following dimensionless quantities:$$\begin{aligned}
\epsilon\rightarrow\frac{\epsilon}{\gamma_1},\ v_0\rightarrow\frac{v_0}{\gamma_1},\_\delta\rightarrow\frac{\delta}{\gamma_1},\ k_y\rightarrow lk_y,\_\text{and}\_\vec r\rightarrow\frac{\vec r}{l}.
\label{dimensionless}\end{aligned}$$ Notice that for the two stacking configurations, $\gamma_{1}$ was found to_be_different. For_the_AB-BL_the value is $\gamma_1\approx0.4$ eV_while for AA-BL it is_$\gamma_1\approx0.2$ eV[@li2009band;_@AA-gamma1; @AA-Yuehua2010].

![(Colour online) Different geometries for bilayer and_two_decoupled graphene layer_interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission probabilities. (a)_AA or AB stacking bilayer graphene_sandwiched between two_SL_garaphene_layers (2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL_leads with 2SL as intermediate region_(AB-2SL-AB), (c) two single gaphene layers_connected to AB-BL(2SL-AB), and (d) similar to_(b) but now with AA-BL as_the leads with two upper_(red)-lower (blue)_shifted Dirac cones (AA-2SL-AA). (e)_left and right_leads are_bilayer graphene with_different stacking connected to the two_decoupled graphene sheets_(AA-2SL-AB). The possible transmission processes between_the_different conduction channel_are_indicated_above the_respective junctions. []{data-label="intro-fig02"}](trans-channels1.pdf_"fig:"){width="3.6"}\
![(Colour_online) Different_geometries_for bilayer and two decoupled graphene_layer_interfaces with schematic representation of the transmission_probabilities. (a) AA or_AB_stacking bilayer graphene sandwiched_between two SL garaphene layers_(2SL-AA(AB)-2SL), (b) AB-BL leads with 2SL_as intermediate_region (AB-2SL-AB),_(c