\[fig:fe\] we plot the electron energy spectrum $$N(E) = \frac{2\pi}{c^2} \,p \,\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e} c^4}\, \int^1_{-1} d\mu\, f_{\rm e} (p, \mu),
\label{eq:NE}$$ in numerical calculation A3, where $\mu = p_\parallel/p$ and $E
=\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e} c^4}-m_{\rm e} c^2$. As this figure shows, a power-law-like structure develops over a narrow range of energies. At the end of the wave-injection period (i.e., at $t= t_{\rm
  inj} = 3\times 10^6 \mbox{ eV}$), this approximate power law extends from  $\sim 7 \mbox{ keV}$ to $\sim 25 \mbox{ keV}$, and $N(E)$ is roughly proportional to $E^{-3.3}$ in this range, shown in Figure \[fig:fe\]. A similar power-law-like feature appears in Case 4 of MLM96 (their Figure 11). However, their approximate power law is much flatter than ours ($\sim E^{-\eta}$ with $\eta$ as small as 1.2) and extends to larger energies ($> 100 \mbox{ keV})$.

![The electron energy spectrum $N(E)$ at three different times in model solution A3. \[fig:fe\]](fe_kev.eps){width="12.cm"}

For reference, we carry out a fourth numerical calculation, A4, that is identical to A3, except that $E_{kz}$ is included. In this calculation, about 16% of the total energy injected into waves is transferred to electrons, which is about half as much as in solution A3. The values of $N_{20 \rm max}$ and $R_{20 \rm max}$ are $3.7\times 10^{6}$ and $2.0\times 10^7$ s$^{-1}$, respectively. These values are $\sim$ 8 times and 10 times smaller than those in solution A3. These reductions occur for the same reasons that the inclusion of $E_{kz}$ reduces the linear damping rate of fast waves in Maxwellian plasm
\[fig: fe\ ] we plot the electron energy spectrum $ $ N(E) = \frac{2\pi}{c^2 } \,p \,\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e } c^4}\, \int^1_{-1 } d\mu\, f_{\rm e } (p, \mu), 
 \label{eq: NE}$$ in numerical calculation   A3, where $ \mu = p_\parallel / p$ and $ E 
 = \sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm east } c^4}-m_{\rm e } c^2$. As this name shows, a power - law - comparable structure develops over a minute stove of energies. At the goal of the wave - injection period   (i.e., at $ t= t_{\rm 
   inj } = 3\times 10 ^ 6 \mbox { eV}$), this approximate power police extends from   $ \sim 7 \mbox { keV}$ to $ \sim 25 \mbox { keV}$, and $ N(E)$ is roughly proportional to $ E^{-3.3}$ in this image, indicate in Figure   \[fig: fe\ ]. A similar power - law - like feature look in Case 4 of MLM96 (their Figure 11). However, their approximate power law is a lot flatter than ours ($ \sim E^{-\eta}$ with $ \eta$ as little as 1.2) and extends to bigger energies ($ > 100 \mbox { keV})$. 

! [ The electron energy spectrum $ N(E)$ at three different times in model solution A3. \[fig: fe\]](fe_kev.eps){width="12.cm " } 

 For citation, we carry out a fourth numerical calculation, A4, that is identical to A3, except that $ E_{kz}$ is included. In this calculation, about 16% of the total department of energy inject into waves is transferred to electrons, which is about half as much as in solution   A3. The values of $ N_{20 \rm max}$ and $ R_{20 \rm max}$ are $ 3.7\times 10^{6}$ and $ 2.0\times 10 ^ 7 $ s$^{-1}$, respectively. These values are $ \sim$ 8 times and 10 fourth dimension smaller than those in solution   A3. These reductions happen for the like reasons that the inclusion of   $ E_{kz}$ reduces the linear dampen rate of fast waves in Maxwellian plasm
\[fig:ve\] we plot the electron tnergy spectrum $$N(G) = \frac{2\pm}{c^2} \,p \,\sqdt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e} c^4}\, \int^1_{-1} d\mu\, f_{\rm e} (p, \mu),
\label{xq:NE}$$ in nymerical calculation A3, dhere $\mu = p_\parallwl/p$ end $E
=\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm x} c^4}-m_{\rm e} c^2$. As fmis fngnre shows, a powgr-law-like stsucture develo[s orer a narrow range of energies. At thq end og hhe wave-injectyon keryod (i.s., at $t= t_{\rm
  inj} = 3\times 10^6 \mbox{ eV}$), thjs apprmximate power law extends from  $\sim 7 \mbod{ keG}$ to $\sim 25 \mbox{ keV}$, and $N(E)$ is tkugroy proportioval to $E^{-3.3}$ in this range, shown in Figure \[fig:fe\]. A similar powex-law-like feqtyre dppears in Rase 4 jf MLM96 (their Figure 11). Howevet, their approxlmate poqer law is much flattxr than ours ($\sim E^{-\etw}$ with $\etd$ cs small as 1.2) and extebdw to nargar evwrgkes ($> 100 \mgox{ keG})$.

![Thx electron snergy specrrum $N(E)$ at three digfqgrnt times in model sjlution A3. \[fig:fe\]](fe_kev.eps){width="12.cm"}

For refertnce, se carry out a fourth nymerical calculation, W4, that is identical to A3, except that $E_{kz}$ is included. In thhs camzulcblon, xvokt 16% of the total energy injected into waves if ttaksferred to elecbrons, which is aboit hsjf as much as in solutjon A3. The values of $N_{20 \rm mwx}$ ane $R_{20 \rm mav}$ arr $3.7\times 10^{6}$ and $2.0\times 10^7$ s$^{-1}$, respextively. Thesv vaoues are $\sim$ 8 timed and 10 timer smsller than those in solution C3. Thess reductiond occur fkf the same reasovs nhat the inclusion of $E_{kz}$ reducqs the liiear bamping fate of faft waves ij Maxwellian plasm
\[fig:fe\] we plot the electron energy spectrum \frac{2\pi}{c^2} \,\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm c^4}\, \int^1_{-1} d\mu\, in calculation A3, where = p_\parallel/p$ and =\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e} c^4}-m_{\rm e} c^2$. this figure shows, a power-law-like structure develops over a narrow range of energies. the end of the wave-injection period (i.e., at $t= t_{\rm inj} = 3\times \mbox{ this power extends from $\sim 7 \mbox{ keV}$ to $\sim 25 \mbox{ keV}$, and $N(E)$ is roughly proportional $E^{-3.3}$ in this range, shown in Figure \[fig:fe\]. similar power-law-like feature appears Case 4 of MLM96 (their 11). their approximate law much than ours ($\sim with $\eta$ as small as 1.2) and extends to larger energies ($> 100 \mbox{ keV})$. ![The electron spectrum $N(E)$ different times model A3. For reference, we a fourth numerical calculation, A4, that A3, except that $E_{kz}$ is included. In this about 16% the total energy injected into waves transferred to electrons, which is about half as as in solution A3. The values of $N_{20 \rm max}$ and $R_{20 \rm max}$ are and $2.0\times 10^7$ s$^{-1}$, These values are 8 and times than those solution A3. These reductions occur for the same reasons that the of $E_{kz}$ reduces the linear damping rate of fast waves plasm
\[fig:fe\] we plot the electron eneRgy spectruM $$N(E) = \frAc{2\pI}{c^2} \,p \,\SqRt{p^2 c^2+M^2_{\rm e} C^4}\, \int^1_{-1} d\mu\, f_{\rm e} (p, \mu),
\LAbel{Eq:NE}$$ in numerical calculaTion A3, WhERe $\mu = P_\PaRalleL/p$ and $E
=\sQRt{P^2 C^2+M^2_{\rm E} c^4}-M_{\rM e} c^2$. as THiS figuRe sHows, a poWer-law-like StrUcTure develops OVeR a narrow raNge Of energies. At The End of tHe WavE-InjecTioN periOd (i.e., at $T= T_{\rm
  inj} = 3\Times 10^6 \mbox{ EV}$), THis appROximate POWeR law Extends from  $\sim 7 \mboX{ Kev}$ To $\sim 25 \mbox{ keV}$, anD $N(E)$ is rOuGHlY PRopOrtIonal to $E^{-3.3}$ in ThIs ranGE, shown iN fiGURE \[fiG:Fe\]. A similar powEr-law-like feATurE appeaRs In CASe 4 of MLm96 (theiR FIGurE 11). However, theIr apProximate Power lAW is much FLatter tHan ourS ($\siM E^{-\eTa}$ wiTH $\eTa$ As sMaLL as 1.2) ANd ExtENds To larger EnErGies ($> 100 \mBox{ kEv})$.

![tHE eleCtrOn enErgy sPectrum $N(E)$ at thRee DiffERenT timeS in moDel sOlUtion a3. \[fig:fe\]](Fe_kev.EpS){width="12.cm"}

For refeRencE, we carry oUt a FoUrtH nUmeriCAl calcUlaTioN, A4, that iS identiCAl tO A3, EXCEpT that $E_{kz}$ is included. in THIs CalculatIon, aboUT 16% oF tHE total enErGy iNjecTED into WaveS Is TransferRed to eLEcTrOns, whicH iS about HaLf aS muCh as iN SoluTion A3. THe values Of $N_{20 \rm MAx}$ and $R_{20 \rm max}$ are $3.7\TImes 10^{6}$ and $2.0\times 10^7$ s$^{-1}$, REsPECtIVely. theSe values are $\Sim$ 8 tIMes aNd 10 tiMEs SmaLLer thAn thoSe IN sOLution A3. These reductiOnS occur For thE same reasons tHat the inclUSIOn of $E_{kz}$ rEducES tHE linear damping Rate oF fast waves IN MaxwellIan plAsm
\[fig:fe\] we plot the ele ctron ener gy sp ect rum  $ $N(E ) =\frac{2\pi}{c^ 2 } \, p \,\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_ {\rme} c^4} \ ,\int^ 1_{-1}d \m u \ , f _{ \r m e }( p,  \mu) ,
\ label{e q:NE}$$ in  nu me rical calcul a ti on A3, whe re$\mu = p_\pa ral lel/p$  a nd$ E
=\s qrt {p^2c^2+m^ 2 _{\rme} c^4}-m _{ \ rm e}c ^2$. As t hi s fi gure shows, a pow e r- l aw-like struct ure de ve l op s ove r a  narrow ra ng e ofe nergies .  A t t hee nd of the wav e-injection per iod (i .e .,a t $t=t_{\r m in j} = 3\time s 10 ^6 \mbox{  eV}$) ,  this a p proxima te pow erlaw  ext e nd sfro m$\s i m7 \ m box { keV}$to  $ \sim25 \ m b o x { ke V}$ , an d $N( E)$ is roughl y p ropo r tio nal t o $E^ {-3. 3} $ inthis r ange,  s hown in Figure\[fi g:fe\]. A  si mi lar  p ower- l aw-lik e f eat ure app ears in Cas e4 o fMLM96 (their Figur e1 1 ).  However , thei r  a pp r oximatepo wer  law i s muc h fl a tt er thanours ( $ \s im  E^{-\e ta }$ wit h$\e ta$  as s m allas 1.2 ) and ex tends to larger ener g ies ($> 100 \ m bo x {  k e V})$ .
![The elect rone nerg y sp e ct rum $N(E) $ atth r ee different times inmo del so lutio n A3. \[fig:f e\]](fe_ke v . e ps){widt h="1 2 .c m "}

For refere nce,we carry o u t a four th nu mericalcalculati o n , A4, th atiside nti c a lto A3, except t hat$E _{kz}$isinclude d.Inthi s c al culation,  about 1 6%  o fth e t otale nergy in je cte dint o wav e s is t ransf erre dto ele ctrons, wh i c h is  a bo ut h alf  a s muc h as insolutio n A3. The  va l uesof  $ N_{20 \ rm max}$ and$R _{20 \rm m ax }$are $3 . 7 \times 1 0^{6}$ and $2.0\times 1 0 ^7$ s$^ {-1 }$, r espe ctively.The se val ues are $\ sim$ 8  time sand 1 0 tim e s  s mal le r than tho s e  in  solu ti on A 3. Thes e reductions occur for  the same rea son s th a t  t hei nc l usi on of$ E _{kz}$ reducesthe linear  d a mp ing rate o f  fa st  wavesin Maxw ellia n  plasm
\[fig:fe\] we_plot the_electron energy spectrum $$N(E)_= \frac{2\pi}{c^2}_\,p_\,\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm_e}_c^4}\, \int^1_{-1} d\mu\,_f_{\rm e} (p,_\mu),
\label{eq:NE}$$ in numerical calculation A3,_where $\mu =_p_\parallel/p$_and $E
=\sqrt{p^2 c^2+m^2_{\rm e} c^4}-m_{\rm e} c^2$. As this figure shows, a power-law-like structure_develops_over a_narrow_range_of energies. At the end_of the wave-injection period (i.e., at_$t= t_{\rm
_ inj} = 3\times 10^6 \mbox{ eV}$), this_approximate_power law extends_from  $\sim 7 \mbox{ keV}$ to $\sim 25 \mbox{_keV}$, and $N(E)$ is roughly proportional_to $E^{-3.3}$ in_this_range,_shown in Figure \[fig:fe\]. A_similar power-law-like feature appears in Case_4 of MLM96 (their Figure 11)._However, their approximate power law is much_flatter than ours ($\sim E^{-\eta}$ with_$\eta$ as small as 1.2)_and extends_to larger energies ($> 100_\mbox{ keV})$.

![The electron_energy spectrum_$N(E)$ at three_different times in model solution A3._\[fig:fe\]](fe_kev.eps){width="12.cm"}

For reference, we_carry out a fourth numerical calculation,_A4,_that is identical_to_A3,_except that_$E_{kz}$ is included._In_this calculation,_about_16% of the total energy injected_into_waves is transferred to electrons, which is_about half as much_as_in solution A3. The values_of $N_{20 \rm max}$ and_$R_{20 \rm max}$ are $3.7\times 10^{6}$_and $2.0\times_10^7$ s$^{-1}$,_respectively. These values are $\sim$ 8 times and 10 times smaller_than those in solution A3. These reductions_occur for the same_reasons that_the_inclusion of $E_{kz}$ reduces_the_linear damping_rate of fast waves in Maxwellian plasm