 upper bound follows from the condition that $V(\phi_P )\approx 1$, since the minisuperspace approximation is unlikely to be valid when the potential energy of the matter sector exceeds the Planck density. However, in a chaotic inflationary scenario there is a critical value of the scalar field, $\phi_{suf}$, and sufficient inflation occurs if $\phi_i >
\phi_{suf}$ but not for $\phi_i<\phi_{suf}$. We must therefore calculate the conditional probability that sufficient inflation occurs given that $\phi_i$ is bounded by $\phi_{min}$ and $\phi_P$. This quantity takes the form [@hall91] \[condprob\] P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[suf]{}|\_[min]{}&lt;\_[i]{}&lt;\_[P]{}) =  , and allows us to determine which of the two boundary conditions considered here “naturally” predicts a phase of sufficiently long inflationary expansion. Sufficient inflation is a prediction of a theory if $P\approx 1$, whereas it is not if $P \ll 1$.

For standard reheating the minimum amount of inflation that solves the horizon problem is determined by the condition $N\equiv \ln
(a_f / a_i ) \approx 65$, where subscripts $i$ and $f$ denote the values of the scale factor at the onset and end of inflation respectively [@guth]. It is then straightforward to deduce from the classical field equations that \[efold\] N  65  6 \_[\_[f]{}]{}\^[\_[suf]{}]{} V() ( )\^[-1]{}d , where the value of the scalar field at the end of inflation, $\phi_f$, is computed from the relation ł[end]{} \_[= \_f]{}\^[2]{} = 1 . This condition corresponds to the breakdown of the slow-roll approximation [@st1984].[^1] Once $\phi_f$ is known, the value of $\phi_{suf}$ can be determined numerically by evaluating the integral in Eq. (\[efold\]).

To understand how the probability densities (\[rhot\]) and (\[rhohh\]) change in the quadratic and cubic cases, we shall consider them in turn. Since (\[rhot\]) and (\[rhohh\]) are usually [*not*]{} normalisable (unless the range of values that $\phi$ can take is bounded), we set the “normalisation constants” equal to one as
upper bound follows from the condition that $ V(\phi_P) \approx 1 $, since the minisuperspace approximation is improbable to be valid when the likely energy of the matter sector surpass the Planck concentration. However, in a chaotic inflationary scenario there is a critical value of the scalar field, $ \phi_{suf}$, and sufficient inflation happen if $ \phi_i > 
 \phi_{suf}$ but not for $ \phi_i<\phi_{suf}$. We must therefore calculate the conditional probability that sufficient ostentation occurs give that $ \phi_i$ is bounded by $ \phi_{min}$ and $ \phi_P$. This measure takes the form [ @hall91 ] \[condprob\ ] P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[suf]{}|\_[min]{}&lt;\_[i]{}&lt;\_[P ] { }) =  , and allows us to determine which of the two boundary condition considered here “ naturally ” predicts a phase of sufficiently long inflationary expansion. Sufficient inflation is a prediction of a theory if $ P\approx 1 $, whereas it is not if $ phosphorus \ll 1$. 

 For standard reheating the minimum measure of inflation that solves the horizon trouble is determined by the circumstance $ N\equiv \ln 
 (a_f / a_i) \approx 65 $, where subscripts $ i$ and $ f$ denote the values of the scale factor at the onset and end of ostentation respectively [ @guth ]. It is then straightforward to deduce from the classical field equations that \[efold\ ] N    65    6 \_[\_[f]{}]{}\^[\_[suf ] { } ] { }   V () () \^[-1]{}d  , where the value of the scalar field at the end of ostentation, $ \phi_f$, is calculate from the sexual intercourse ł[end ] { } \_[= \_f]{}\^[2 ] { } = 1  . This condition corresponds to the breakdown of the slow - roll approximation [ @st1984].[^1 ] Once $ \phi_f$ is know, the value of $ \phi_{suf}$ can be determine numerically by evaluating the integral in Eq. (\[efold\ ]). 

 To sympathize how the probability density (\[rhot\ ]) and (\[rhohh\ ]) variety in the quadratic and cubic cases, we shall consider them in turn. Since (\[rhot\ ]) and (\[rhohh\ ]) are usually [ * not * ] { } normalisable (unless the range of values that $ \phi$ can take is bounded), we jell the “ normalisation constants ” equal to one as
 upoer bound follows from tme condition thaj $C(\phi_P )\epprox 1$, since tfe minisuperspace approximatmon us unoikely to be valid whev the potvntial enwrgy if the matvsr sector excscds tke Planck densiti. However, in a chaotic infnagilnary scenario there is a critical dalue og hhe scalar fiejd, $\pny_{suf}$, and sufficient inflation occurs ir $\phi_i >
\khi_{suf}$ but not for $\phi_i<\phi_{suf}$. We must thereflre falculate the condltional provabijuty that sufwicient inflation occuts given that $\phi_i$ is bounded by $\phi_{mnn}$ and $\phi_P$. Tyis xuantity tajes tre form [@hall91] \[condprot\] P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[sif]{}|\_[min]{}&lt;\_[i]{}&lt;\_[P]{}) =  , snd aloows us to determine xhich of the two bougdary congicions considered here “nqturanly” [redkxts a khaxe of suvfiriently lonf inflationqry expansion. Suffiviqbt inflation js a pweqiction of a theory if $P\approx 1$, whereas it is not if $P \ll 1$.

For stabdard reheating the mlnimum amjunt of inflation that solves the horizon problem is dxtdrmnkcd bh tje condition $N\equiv \ln
(a_f / a_i ) \approx 65$, where stgsvrppts $i$ and $f$ denobe the values of tne svwle factor at the ouaef and end of inflahion refpectuvely [@gutr]. It is then straightforward to deduce from rhe classical fielb equations chat \[egold\] M  65  6 \_[\_[f]{}]{}\^[\_[suf]{}]{} V() ( )\^[-1]{}d , where the vauue kf the scalwr field zg the end of infuatpon, $\[hi_f$, is computed from the welation ł[xnd]{} \_[= \_y]{}\^[2]{} = 1 . This concition corresponfs to the breakdown of tje sllw-soll approdimation [@st1984].[^1] Once $\phi_f$ is known, vie value of $\pni_{vuf}$ can be betermlned numericallr by evaluatiny the incegral in Eq. (\[efomd\]).

To unverstand how the probabilhjy densities (\[chot\]) and (\[whohy\]) chqnge in ghe quadratic snd cubic cases, we whall consider thek iv turn. Since (\[rhoc\]) qnd (\[rhohh\]) are uxuauly [*nlt*]{} njsmalisable (utlesr tfr ranee of valuew thay $\phi$ can take is bogndes), we set the “normakifation cinstants” equal to one as
upper bound follows from the condition that 1$, the minisuperspace is unlikely to energy the matter sector the Planck density. in a chaotic inflationary scenario there a critical value of the scalar field, $\phi_{suf}$, and sufficient inflation occurs if > \phi_{suf}$ but not for $\phi_i<\phi_{suf}$. We must therefore calculate the conditional probability sufficient occurs that is bounded by $\phi_{min}$ and $\phi_P$. This quantity takes the form [@hall91] \[condprob\] P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[suf]{}|\_[min]{}&lt;\_[i]{}&lt;\_[P]{}) = , allows us to determine which of the two conditions considered here “naturally” a phase of sufficiently long expansion. inflation is prediction a if $P\approx 1$, it is not if $P \ll 1$. For standard reheating the minimum amount of inflation that solves horizon problem by the $N\equiv (a_f a_i ) \approx subscripts $i$ and $f$ denote the scale factor at the onset and end of respectively [@guth]. is then straightforward to deduce from classical field equations that \[efold\] N 65 6 V() ( )\^[-1]{}d , where the value of the scalar field at the end of is computed from the ł[end]{} \_[= \_f]{}\^[2]{} 1 This corresponds the breakdown the slow-roll approximation [@st1984].[^1] Once $\phi_f$ is known, the value of can be determined numerically by evaluating the integral in Eq. understand the probability densities and (\[rhohh\]) change in quadratic cubic cases, we shall in Since are [*not*]{} (unless the range of that $\phi$ can take is we set the “normalisation
 upper bound follows from the cOndition thAt $V(\phI_P )\aPprOx 1$, SincE the Minisuperspace APproXimation is unlikely to be Valid WhEN the POtEntiaL energy OF tHE MatTeR sEctOr EXcEeds tHe PLanck deNsity. HowevEr, iN a Chaotic inflaTIoNary scenarIo tHere is a critiCal Value oF tHe sCAlar fIelD, $\phi_{sUf}$, and sUFficieNt inflatiOn OCcurs iF $\Phi_i >
\phi_{SUF}$ bUt noT for $\phi_i<\phi_{suf}$. We mUSt THerefore calculAte the CoNDiTIOnaL prObability tHaT suffICient inFLaTION ocCUrs given that $\pHi_i$ is boundeD By $\pHi_{min}$ aNd $\Phi_p$. this quAntitY tAKes The form [@hall91] \[CondProb\] P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[sUf]{}|\_[min]{}&lT;\_[I]{}&lt;\_[P]{}) =  , and ALlows us To deteRmiNe wHich OF tHe Two BoUNdaRY cOndITioNs considErEd Here “nAturALLY” PredIctS a phAse of Sufficiently lOng InflATioNary eXpansIon. SUfFicieNt inflAtion Is A prediction of a tHeorY if $P\approX 1$, whErEas It Is not IF $P \ll 1$.

FoR stAndArd reheAting thE MinImUM AMoUnt of inflation that SoLVEs The horizOn probLEm Is DEtermineD bY thE conDITion $N\EquiV \Ln
(A_f / a_i ) \apprOx 65$, wherE SuBsCripts $i$ AnD $f$ denoTe The ValUes of THe scAle facTor at the Onset ANd end of inflatiON respectively [@GUtH]. iT iS Then StrAightforwarD to dEDuce From THe ClaSSical Field EqUAtIOns that \[efold\] N  65  6 \_[\_[f]{}]{}\^[\_[suf]{}]{} V() ( )\^[-1]{}d , WhEre the Value Of the scalar fiEld at the enD OF InflatioN, $\phi_F$, Is COmputed from the RelatIon ł[end]{} \_[= \_f]{}\^[2]{} = 1 . ThIS conditiOn corResponds To the breaKDOwn of the SloW-roLl aPprOXImAtion [@st1984].[^1] Once $\phI_F$ Is knOwN, the valUe oF $\phi_{suf}$ Can Be dEteRmiNeD numericaLly by evaLuAtInG tHe iNtegrAL in Eq. (\[efoLd\]).

to uNdErsTand hOW the prObabiLity DeNsITieS (\[rhot\]) anD (\[RhOHH\]) chaNgE iN the QuaDrAtic aNd cuBIc cAses, we sHall consiDer THem iN tUrN. Since (\[rHot\]) and (\[rhohh\]) arE uSually [*not*]{} nOrMalIsable (UNLess the rAnge of values that $\phi$ can tAKe is bouNdeD), we seT the “NormalisaTioN constAntS” Equal tO one as
 upper bound follows fromthe condit ion t hat  $V (\ phi_ P )\ approx 1$, sin c e th e minisuperspace appro ximat io n  isu nl ikely  to bev al i d  wh en  t hepo t en tialene rgy ofthe matter  se ct or exceeds t h ePlanck den sit y. However,ina chao ti c i n flati ona ry sc enario thereis a crit ic a l valu e  of the s ca larfield, $\phi_{suf } $, and sufficient  infla ti o no c cur s i f $\phi_i>\phi_ { suf}$ b u tn o t  fo r  $\phi_i<\phi _{suf}$. We mus t ther ef ore calcul ate t he con ditional pr obab ility tha t suff i cient i n flation  occur s g ive n th a t$\ phi _i $  is bo und e d b y $\phi_ {m in }$ an d $\ p h i _ P$.Thi s qu antit y takes the f orm  [@h a ll9 1] \[ condp rob\ ]P(\_[ i]{}&g t;\_[ su f]{}|\_[min]{}& lt;\ _[i]{}&lt ;\_ [P ]{} )=  ,a nd all ows  us  to det erminew hic ho f th e two boundary con di t i on s consid ered h e re  “ n aturally ”pre dict s a pha se o f  s ufficien tly lo n gin flation ar y expa ns ion . S uffic i entinflat ion is a  pred i ction of a the o ry if $P\appr o x1 $ ,w here asit is not i f $P \ll1$.Fo r s t andar d reh ea t in g  the minimum amount  o f infl ation  that solvesthe horizo n p roblem i s de t er m ined by the co nditi on $N\equi v  \ln
(a_ f / a _i ) \ap prox 65$, w here sub scr ipt s $ i$a n d$f$ denote th e valu es  of the  sc ale fac tor  at  th e o ns et and en d of inf la ti on  r esp ectiv e ly [@gut h] . I tisthens traigh tforw ardto  d e duc e fromt he c lass ic al  fie ldeq uatio ns t h at\[efold \] N  65 6\ _[\_ [f ]{ }]{}\^[ \_[suf]{}]{}V( ) ( )\^[-1 ]{ }d, wher e the valu e of the scalar field a t  the en d o f inf lati on, $\phi _f$ , is c omp u ted fr om the  rela ti onł [ end]{ } \_ [=\_ f]{}\^[2]{ } = 1  . Th is  con ditioncorresponds to the bre akdown of the  sl ow-r o l lapp r ox i mat io n  [@ s t 1984].[^1] Once  $\phi_f$is kn own, the v a lue  o f $\phi _{suf}$  canb e deter mined num ericallyby  eva l u ati ng the int egral in  Eq. (\[e f old\] ) .
To u nde rstand  h owthe p robabi l ity  dens ities(\ [rhot\ ]) an d(\[rhohh \]) change in the quadr atic a nd cu bic  cases, w e s h all  consider  the m in turn.  Si nce  (\[r hot \ ]) an d (\ [ rh ohh \ ]) ar e us u ally [*no t *] {}n o rm alisable (u n l e ssthe r ang e  of va lues  that $\phi$ cant ake is bounded ), w e set  th e  “no rm alisation cons tan ts ” equal to  o ne as
 upper_bound follows_from the condition that_$V(\phi_P )\approx_1$,_since the_minisuperspace_approximation is unlikely_to be valid_when the potential energy_of the matter_sector_exceeds the Planck density. However, in a chaotic inflationary scenario there is a critical_value_of the_scalar_field,_$\phi_{suf}$, and sufficient inflation occurs_if $\phi_i >
\phi_{suf}$ but not_for $\phi_i<\phi_{suf}$._We must therefore calculate the conditional probability that_sufficient_inflation occurs given_that $\phi_i$ is bounded by $\phi_{min}$ and $\phi_P$. This_quantity takes the form [@hall91] \[condprob\]_P(\_[i]{}&gt;\_[suf]{}|\_[min]{}&lt;\_[i]{}&lt;\_[P]{}) =  ,_and_allows_us to determine which_of the two boundary conditions considered_here “naturally” predicts a phase of_sufficiently long inflationary expansion. Sufficient inflation is_a prediction of a theory if_$P\approx 1$, whereas it is_not if_$P \ll 1$.

For standard reheating_the minimum amount_of inflation_that solves the_horizon problem is determined by the_condition $N\equiv \ln
(a_f_/ a_i ) \approx 65$, where_subscripts_$i$ and $f$_denote_the_values of_the scale factor_at_the onset_and_end of inflation respectively [@guth]. It_is_then straightforward to deduce from the classical_field equations that \[efold\]_N  65  6_\_[\_[f]{}]{}\^[\_[suf]{}]{} V() ( )\^[-1]{}d , where_the value of the scalar_field at the end of inflation,_$\phi_f$, is_computed from_the relation ł[end]{} \_[= \_f]{}\^[2]{} = 1 . This condition corresponds to_the breakdown of the slow-roll approximation_[@st1984].[^1] Once $\phi_f$ is_known, the_value_of $\phi_{suf}$ can_be_determined numerically_by evaluating the integral in Eq. (\[efold\]).

To_understand how_the probability densities (\[rhot\]) and (\[rhohh\])_change in the quadratic_and_cubic cases, we shall consider them_in turn. Since (\[rhot\]) and (\[rhohh\])_are usually [*not*]{} normalisable (unless_the_range_of values that $\phi$ can_take is bounded), we set the_“normalisation constants” equal_to one as