 heavy elements such as Ar, Ca and Fe. One may argue that CC SN of a massive progenitor 30–35[*[M]{}*]{}$_\odot$ may leave a black hole rather than a neutron star. However, other observations show that a neutron star can be still formed from even these massive progenitor stars (@Muno2006).

Although @Park2004 and @Gonzalez2003 reported significant spatial variations in the sub-arcmin scale, we find no significant and systematic variations in the spatial scale over arcmin. In fact, the best-fit abundances of most of the heavy elements show no variations within their typical errors of 50%. Nevertheless, we find marginal evidence of spatial variation of Fe in the ejecta; the north region is enhanced compared to that of the center region. Since the position of the neutron star (PWN) is off-set to southeast from the geometrical SNR center (@Park2007), it would be conceivable that Fe from the core region would be ejected to the opposite northwest direction. Our observational result of the Fe variation is marginal to support this off-set effect due to large errors. To establish this kick-off scenario, we need higher quality observations.

The best-fit spectral parameters of the PWN, the photon index and unabsorbed flux (4–8keV) are 1.91$\pm$0.03 and (3.80$\pm$0.18)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The photon index is steeper than that of the pulsar (1.6–1.7, @Hughes2001, [-@Hughes2003]). Probably the index increases as the distance from the central pulsar increases (e.g. @Slane2000). The PWN flux is 52% of the total flux (4–8keV) from the whole SNR ((7.30$\pm$0.06)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$). This ratio is slightly smaller than 66%, determined with the high spatial resolution observation of Chandra (Hughes et al. 2001). This difference, however, would be within uncertainty range due possibly to the NXB and CXB subtraction[^1], and/or other systematic cross errors including different data reduction processes between Suzaku and Chandra. Thus our simultaneous fitting analysis properly estimates the flux and spectra of both the SNR and the PWN, although the spatial resolution of Suzaku is limited to completely separate the emissions from
heavy elements such as Ar, Ca and Fe. One may argue that CC SN of a massive progenitor 30–35[*[M]{}*]{}$_\odot$ may leave a black fix preferably than a neutron star. However, other observations testify that a neutron star can be still shape from even these massive progenitor star (@Muno2006). 

 Although @Park2004 and @Gonzalez2003 reported meaning spatial variation in the sub - arcmin scale, we witness no significant and systematic variations in the spatial scale over arcmin. In fact, the best - fit abundances of most of the fleshy elements show no variations within their distinctive errors of 50% . Nevertheless, we receive borderline evidence of spatial variation of Fe in the ejecta; the union region is enhanced compared to that of the center area. Since the position of the neutron star (PWN) is off - set to southeast from the geometrical SNR center (@Park2007), it would be conceivable that Fe from the core region would be ejected to the opposite northwest direction. Our observational result of the Fe variation is marginal to support this off - sic effect due to large error. To establish this kick - off scenario, we need higher timbre observations. 

 The well - fit spectral parameters of the PWN, the photon exponent and unabsorbed flux (4–8keV) are 1.91$\pm$0.03 and (3.80$\pm$0.18)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The photon index is steeper than that of the pulsar (1.6–1.7, @Hughes2001, [ -@Hughes2003 ]). Probably the index increases as the distance from the central pulsar increases (e.g. @Slane2000). The PWN flux is 52% of the total magnetic field (4–8keV) from the whole SNR (( 7.30$\pm$0.06)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photon s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$). This proportion is slenderly smaller than 66% , determined with the high spatial resolution observation of Chandra (Hughes et al. 2001). This difference, however, would be within uncertainty range ascribable possibly to the NXB and CXB subtraction[^1 ], and/or other taxonomic cross errors including different data decrease processes between Suzaku and Chandra. Thus our simultaneous fitting analysis properly estimate the flux and spectrum of both the SNR and the PWN, although the spatial resolution of Suzaku is specify to completely separate the discharge from
 hewvy elements such as Ar, Ga and Fe. One mai qrgue vhat CC SN of a massive progenitor 30–35[*[M]{}*]{}$_\odot$ mab leqve a black hole rather thav a neutrln star. Yoweter, other observefions smjw tgwt a ieutron star cak be still xormed from evan tkese massive progenitor stars (@Muno2006).

Alehough @Lagk2004 and @Gonzalee2003 reppwted significant spatial variations in the suu-arcmin scale, wr find no significant and dystfmatic variations ln the spatual fxale over arzmin. In fabc, the best-fjt abundances of most of the hexvy ekements shiw no eariations xithin their typical errorv of 50%. Nrvertheless, we fiid mqrginal evidence of s'atial variation of Se in the electa; the north regiob us envancad cunpafed tp fhat ov tie center rsgion. Since the position of tht nqlyron star (PWH) is osf-fet to southeast from the geometrical STR denter (@Park2007), it would be conceivable that Fe vrom the sore region would be ejected to the opposite nortvwest airtcblon. Uyr observational result of the Fe variation is izrbikal to support tmis off-set effect cuf yj large errorr. To estaglish this kick-off scenaryo, we need higrer auality observations.

The besr-fit spectraj parameters of the PWN, the phuton indec and unabsorbed flux (4–8kzV) are 1.91$\pm$0.03 and (3.80$\pm$0.18)$\tlmes$10$^{-4}$ photkvs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectixelj. Tha photon index is steeper ehan that of che pulsxr (1.6–1.7, @Nughes2001, [-@Hughes2003]). Prlbabln the index increasfs as tve distancf from the central pulsar increexes (e.g. @Slane2000). Tve IWN flux ns 52% of the total fltx (4–8keV) from thg whole SUR ((7.30$\pm$0.06)$\tkmes$10$^{-4}$ photohs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$). This ratio is slightly vlaller than 66%, determiged qith the hief spatial resokution observation if Chandra (Hughes ct al. 2001). This differencz, yowever, would br wkthyn uicertwhnty range dge pussknly tu the NXB akd ZXB xubtraction[^1], and/or otver aystematic cross etrjrs incloding difserent data rrduction processes betwxen Suvaku amd Shandra. Thus our simultaneous ritting ajalnsis properly estlmatgs the flux and spectra of both the SNR and the PWI, although the spatial eesolution of Suzako ix limited tp com[letely saparate the emissionw from
heavy elements such as Ar, Ca and may that CC of a massive black rather than a star. However, other show that a neutron star can still formed from even these massive progenitor stars (@Muno2006). Although @Park2004 and @Gonzalez2003 significant spatial variations in the sub-arcmin scale, we find no significant and systematic in spatial over In fact, the best-fit abundances of most of the heavy elements show no variations within their errors of 50%. Nevertheless, we find marginal evidence spatial variation of Fe the ejecta; the north region enhanced to that the region. the position of neutron star (PWN) is off-set to southeast from the geometrical SNR center (@Park2007), it would be conceivable Fe from region would ejected the northwest direction. Our of the Fe variation is marginal off-set effect due to large errors. To establish kick-off scenario, need higher quality observations. The best-fit parameters of the PWN, the photon index and flux (4–8keV) are 1.91$\pm$0.03 and (3.80$\pm$0.18)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The photon index is steeper of the pulsar (1.6–1.7, [-@Hughes2003]). Probably the increases the from central pulsar (e.g. @Slane2000). The PWN flux is 52% of the total flux from the whole SNR ((7.30$\pm$0.06)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$). This ratio smaller 66%, determined with high spatial resolution observation Chandra et al. 2001). This would within possibly the and CXB subtraction[^1], and/or systematic cross errors including different reduction processes between Suzaku fitting analysis properly estimates the flux and spectra both the SNR and the PWN, although spatial resolution of Suzaku is limited to completely separate the emissions from
 heavy elements such as Ar, Ca anD Fe. One may aRgue tHat cC Sn oF a maSsivE progenitor 30–35[*[M]{}*]{}$_\odOT$ may Leave a black hole rather tHan a nEuTRon sTAr. howevEr, other OBsERVatIoNs ShoW tHAt A neutRon Star can Be still forMed FrOm even these mASsIve progeniTor Stars (@Muno2006).

AltHouGh @Park2004 AnD @GoNZalez2003 RepOrted SignifICant spAtial variAtIOns in tHE sub-arcMIN sCale, We find no significaNT aND systematic varIationS iN ThE SPatIal Scale over aRcMin. In FAct, the bESt-FIT AbuNDances of most oF the heavy elEMenTs show No VarIAtions WithiN tHEir Typical erroRs of 50%. neverthelEss, we fINd margiNAl evideNce of sPatIal VariATiOn Of FE iN The EJeCta; THe nOrth regiOn Is EnhanCed cOMPARed tO thAt of The ceNter region. SinCe tHe poSItiOn of tHe neuTron StAr (PWN) Is off-sEt to sOuTheast from the geOmetRical SNR cEntEr (@parK2007), iT woulD Be concEivAblE that Fe From the COre ReGION wOuld be ejected to the OpPOSiTe northwEst dirECtIoN. our obserVaTioNal rESUlt of The FE VaRiation iS margiNAl To Support ThIs off-sEt EffEct Due to LArge Errors. to establIsh thIS kick-off scenarIO, we need higher QUaLITy OBserVatIons.

The best-Fit sPEctrAl paRAmEteRS of thE PWN, tHe PHoTOn index and unabsorbeD fLux (4–8keV) Are 1.91$\pm$0.03 And (3.80$\pm$0.18)$\times$10$^{-4}$ phoTons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, resPECTively. ThE phoTOn INdex is steeper tHan thAt of the pulSAr (1.6–1.7, @Hughes2001, [-@hugheS2003]). ProbablY the index INCreases aS thE diStaNce FROm The central pulSAR incReAses (e.g. @SLanE2000). The PWN FluX is 52% Of tHe tOtAl flux (4–8keV) From the wHoLe sNr ((7.30$\pM$0.06)$\tiMes$10$^{-4}$ phOTons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$). THiS raTiO is SlighTLy smalLer thAn 66%, deTeRmINed With the HIgH SPatiAl ReSoluTioN oBservAtioN Of CHandra (HUghes et al. 2001). thiS DiffErEnCe, howevEr, would be withIn UncertaintY rAngE due poSSIbly to thE NXB and CXB subtraction[^1], anD/Or other SysTematIc crOss errors IncLuding DifFErent dAta redUctioN pRocESSes beTWEeN SuZaKu and ChandRA. thuS our sImUltaNeous fiTting analysis propeRLy eStimates the flUx aNd spECTrA of BOtH The sNr And THE PWN, although the Spatial resOlUTiOn of Suzaku IS liMiTed to coMpletelY sepaRAte the eMissions fRom
 heavy elements such as Ar , Ca and F e. On e m ayar guethat  CC SN of a ma s sive  progenitor 30–35[*[M] {}*]{ }$ _ \odo t $may l eave ab la c k  ho le  r ath er th an aneu tron st ar. Howeve r,ot her observat i on s show tha t a  neutron sta r c an best ill forme d f rom e ven th e se mas sive prog en i tor st a rs (@Mu n o 20 06). 

Although @Park2 0 04 and @Gonzalez2 003 re po r te d sig nif icant spat ia l var i ationsi nt h e  su b -arcmin scale , we find n o  si gnific an t a n d syst emati cv ari ations in t he s patial sc ale ov e r arcmi n . In fa ct, th e b est -fit ab un dan ce s  of mo sto f t he heavy  e le ments  sho w n o  var iat ions  with in their typi cal  err o rsof 50 %. Ne vert he less,  we fi nd ma rg inal evidence o f sp atial var iat io n o fFe in the ej ect a;the nor th regi o n i se n h an ced compared to th at o fthe cent er reg i on .S ince the  p osi tion o f the  neu t ro n star ( PWN) i s  o ff -set to  s outhea st  fr omthe g e omet ricalSNR cent er (@ P ark2007), it w o uld be concei v ab l e  t h at F e f rom the cor e re g ionwoul d  b e e j ected  to t he op p osite northwest dir ec tion.Our o bservationalresult oft h e  Fe vari atio n  i s  marginal to s uppor t this off - set effe ct du e to lar ge errors . To estab lis h t his  ki c k -o ff scenario,w e  nee dhigherqua lity ob ser vat ion s.
T he best-f it spect ra lpa ra met ers o f  the PWN ,the  p hot on in d ex and  unab sorb ed  f l ux(4–8keV )  a r e  1.9 1$ \p m$0. 03an d (3. 80$\ p m$0 .18)$\t imes$10$^ {-4 } $ ph ot on s s$^{- 1}$ cm$^{-2}$ ,respective ly . T he pho t o n indexis steeper than that of the pul sar  (1.6 –1.7 , @Hughes 200 1, [-@ Hug h es2003 ]). Pr obabl ythe i ndexi n cr eas es  as the di s t anc e fro mthecentral  pulsar increases( e.g . @Slane2000) . T he P W N  f lux is 52%  o f  th e total flux (4–8 keV) fromth e  w hole SNR ( ( 7.3 0$ \pm$0.0 6)$\tim es$10 $ ^{-4}$photons s $^{-1}$ c m$ ^{-2 } $ ).This ratio  is slig htly smal l er th a n66%,det ermine dwit h the  highs pat ial r esolut io n obse rvati on  of Chan dra (Hughes et al. 2001 ). Thi s dif fer ence, how eve r , w ould be w ithi n uncertai nty  ra nge d uep ossib ly t o  t heN XB an d CX B  subtract i on [^1 ] ,  a nd/or other s y ste matic  cr o ss err orsincluding differe n t data reducti on p r o ces ses betw ee n Suzaku and C han dr a .  Thus ou rsimultaneou s fittin ga nalys is pro perlyestimat e s  t h e flux  and  sp ectra ofbot ht he SNRan dt he PWN , al th ough t he spa t ialr e solution of Suza ku is l imite d  to  comp le tely se p arat e the emis sions from
 heavy_elements such_as Ar, Ca and_Fe. One_may_argue that_CC_SN of a_massive progenitor 30–35[*[M]{}*]{}$_\odot$_may leave a black_hole rather than_a_neutron star. However, other observations show that a neutron star can be still formed_from_even these_massive_progenitor_stars (@Muno2006).

Although @Park2004 and @Gonzalez2003_reported significant spatial variations in_the sub-arcmin_scale, we find no significant and systematic variations_in_the spatial scale_over arcmin. In fact, the best-fit abundances of most_of the heavy elements show no_variations within their_typical_errors_of 50%. Nevertheless, we_find marginal evidence of spatial variation_of Fe in the ejecta; the_north region is enhanced compared to that_of the center region. Since the_position of the neutron star_(PWN) is_off-set to southeast from the_geometrical SNR center_(@Park2007), it_would be conceivable_that Fe from the core region_would be ejected_to the opposite northwest direction. Our_observational_result of the_Fe_variation_is marginal_to support this_off-set_effect due_to_large errors. To establish this kick-off_scenario,_we need higher quality observations.

The best-fit spectral_parameters of the PWN,_the_photon index and unabsorbed_flux (4–8keV) are 1.91$\pm$0.03 and_(3.80$\pm$0.18)$\times$10$^{-4}$ photons s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The_photon index_is steeper_than that of the pulsar (1.6–1.7, @Hughes2001, [-@Hughes2003]). Probably the index_increases as the distance from the_central pulsar increases (e.g._@Slane2000). The_PWN_flux is 52%_of_the total_flux (4–8keV) from the whole SNR ((7.30$\pm$0.06)$\times$10$^{-4}$_photons s$^{-1}$_cm$^{-2}$). This ratio is slightly smaller_than 66%, determined with_the_high spatial resolution observation of Chandra_(Hughes et al. 2001). This difference,_however, would be within uncertainty_range_due_possibly to the NXB and_CXB subtraction[^1], and/or other systematic cross_errors including different_data reduction processes between Suzaku and Chandra._Thus_our simultaneous fitting analysis properly estimates_the_flux and spectra of both the_SNR_and_the PWN, although the spatial_resolution of Suzaku is limited to_completely separate the emissions from