 clustering spectrum of $c(k)=0.25$ and different system sizes, ranging from $N=5\times 10^3$ to $N=5\times 10^5$. Plot [**d**]{} in Fig. \[fig:FSS\] shows that the susceptibility exhibits two peaks whose maxima $\chi_{max}$ diverge as power laws, $\chi_{max}(N)\sim N^{\gamma'/\nu}$. The position of the first peak also approaches zero as a power law $p_{max}(N)\sim N^{1/\nu}$, as shown in Fig. \[fig:FSS\] [**b**]{}, which suggests that even if the network has bounded fluctuations, $\langle k^2 \rangle < \infty$, it is always percolated in the thermodynamic limit. In contrast, the position of the second peak is nearly constant in the range of sizes we have considered. The divergence of the two peaks in the susceptibility strongly suggests that we are indeed observing two different continuous phase transitions. The first transition is between non-percolated/percolated phases, and the second transition is between two percolated phases with very different internal organizations.

The $m$-core decomposition
--------------------------

To understand the effect of clustering on the global structure of networks, we use the $m$-core decomposition developed in [@Colomer-de-Simon2013]. This process is based on the concept of edge multiplicity $m$, which is defined as the number of triangles passing through an edge. We further define the $m$-core as the maximal subgraph whose edges all have at least multiplicity $m$ within it. By increasing $m$ from $0$ to $m_{max}$, we define a set of nested subgraphs that we call the $m$-core decomposition of the network. This decomposition can be represented as a branching process that encodes the fragmentation of $m$-cores into disconnected components as $m$ is increased. The tree-like structure of this process provides information regarding the global organization of clustering in networks. To visualize this process, we use the LaNet-vi 3.0 tool developed in [@Colomer-de-Simon2013] (see the caption of Fig. \[fig:mcore\]). Figure \[fig:mcore\] shows the $m$-core decomposition of three networks with $N=5\times 10^4$ nodes, the same degree sequence (with $\gamma=3.1$) and degree-degree correlations, and different
clustering spectrum of $ c(k)=0.25 $ and different system sizes, range from $ N=5\times 10 ^ 3 $ to $ N=5\times 10 ^ 5$. Plot [ * * d * * ] { } in Fig.   \[fig: FSS\ ] usher that the susceptibility exhibits two peaks whose maxima $ \chi_{max}$ diverge as power law, $ \chi_{max}(N)\sim N^{\gamma'/\nu}$. The position of the first point besides approaches zero as a power law $ p_{max}(N)\sim N^{1/\nu}$, as shown in Fig.   \[fig: FSS\ ] [ * * b * * ] { }, which suggests that even if the net has bounded fluctuations, $ \langle k^2 \rangle < \infty$, it is always percolated in the thermodynamic terminus ad quem. In contrast, the position of the second acme is nearly constant in the scope of sizes we have considered. The divergence of the two peak in the susceptibility strongly suggests that we are indeed observing two different continuous phase passage. The first transition is between non - percolated / percolated phases, and the second passage is between two percolated phases with very different internal organizations. 

 The $ m$-core decomposition 
 -------------------------- 

 To understand the effect of clustering on the global structure of networks, we use the $ m$-core decomposition developed in   [ @Colomer - de - Simon2013 ]. This process is establish on the concept of edge multiplicity $ m$, which is define as the issue of triangles passing through an boundary. We further specify the $ m$-core as the maximal subgraph whose edges all have at least numerousness $ m$ within it. By increasing $ m$ from $ 0 $ to $ m_{max}$, we define a set of nested subgraphs that we call the $ m$-core decomposition of the network. This decomposition can be represented as a branching process that encodes the fragmentation of $ m$-cores into confused components as $ m$ is increase. The tree - like structure of this process provides information involve the global organization of clustering in net. To visualize this process, we use the LaNet - vi 3.0 tool developed in   [ @Colomer - delaware - Simon2013 ] (see the caption of Fig.   \[fig: mcore\ ]). Figure   \[fig: mcore\ ] shows the $ m$-core decomposition of three network with $ N=5\times 10 ^ 4 $ nodes, the like degree sequence (with $ \gamma=3.1 $) and degree - degree correlation, and different
 clkstering spectrum of $c(k)=0.25$ xnd different sisrem sives, ranfing froo $N=5\times 10^3$ to $N=5\times 10^5$. Plot [**d**]{} mn Fug. \[fig:DSS\] shows that the suszeptibiliny exhibirs txo peaks whose mesima $\chl_{iax}$ slvergz es power laws, $\cmi_{max}(N)\sim N^{\camma'/\nu}$. The povigiln of the first peak also approachef zero ss a power law $p_{iax}(N)\xym N^{1/\hl}$, cs shown in Fig. \[fig:FSS\] [**b**]{}, which shggests that even if the network has bounded fpuctkations, $\langle k^2 \rwngle < \infti$, it us always pefcolated in the thermosynamic limit. In contrast, the pusitipn of the wexonf peak is neerly cjnstant in tmv range of sizrs we have conxidxred. The divergence of thx two peaks in the sosceptibilhtv strongly suggests tyar we dre hndede ocsedvmng two dlffxrent contihuous phase transitions. The fitse transition ia betwqeg non-percolated/percolated phases, and tht secknd transition is betwewn two percolated phades with dery different internal organizations.

The $m$-core dewompoaktiin
--------------------------

Bo uveegstand the effect of clustering on the global attubture of networks, we use the $m$-fotg decompositiov developsd in [@Colomer-de-Simoj2013]. This krocesw is baseq on the concept of edge multipoicity $m$, whibh iw defined as the nbmber of tricngles passong through an edge. We yurthed define thf $m$-core aa the maximal suberaih wvose edgtr all have at leaft multipoicicy $m$ witfin ot. By yncreasing $m$ from $0$ to $m_{max}$, we defije a ded of nestef subgraphs that we call the $m$-core decompositoot ox the necwork. Bhis decomposityon can be reptesented cs a bfanching pgocess thet encodes tre fragmentathln of $m$-cores into difconbectwd compuvents as $m$ is oncreased. The tree-luke structure of tmis ptodess provides iuyotnation regardimg ghe gpoual owcanization ox cljstdting kn networks. Go vosualize this procesv, we use the LaNet-vi 3.0 yojl develiped in [@Cjlomer-de-Simon2013] (see the caption ov Fig. \[hig:mcoce\]). Figire \[sig:mcore\] shows the $m$-core decomlosition lf bhree networkf wibh $N=5\jimes 10^4$ nodex, the same degree sequence (with $\gamma=3.1$) aid degree-degree correlarions, and different
clustering spectrum of $c(k)=0.25$ and different system from 10^3$ to 10^5$. Plot [**d**]{} the exhibits two peaks maxima $\chi_{max}$ diverge power laws, $\chi_{max}(N)\sim N^{\gamma'/\nu}$. The position the first peak also approaches zero as a power law $p_{max}(N)\sim N^{1/\nu}$, as in Fig. \[fig:FSS\] [**b**]{}, which suggests that even if the network has bounded $\langle \rangle \infty$, is always percolated in the thermodynamic limit. In contrast, the position of the second peak is constant in the range of sizes we have The divergence of the peaks in the susceptibility strongly that are indeed two continuous transitions. The first is between non-percolated/percolated phases, and the second transition is between two percolated phases with very different internal The $m$-core To understand effect clustering the global structure we use the $m$-core decomposition developed process is based on the concept of edge $m$, which defined as the number of triangles through an edge. We further define the $m$-core the maximal subgraph whose edges all have at least multiplicity $m$ within it. By increasing $0$ to $m_{max}$, we a set of subgraphs we the decomposition of network. This decomposition can be represented as a branching process that the fragmentation of $m$-cores into disconnected components as $m$ is tree-like of this process information regarding the global of in networks. To visualize we the developed [@Colomer-de-Simon2013] the caption of Fig. Figure \[fig:mcore\] shows the $m$-core of three networks with degree sequence (with $\gamma=3.1$) and degree-degree correlations, and
 clustering spectrum of $c(k)=0.25$ and Different sYstem SizEs, rAnGing From $n=5\times 10^3$ to $N=5\times 10^5$. pLot [**d**]{} In Fig. \[fig:FSS\] shows that thE suscEpTIbilITy ExhibIts two pEAkS WHosE mAxIma $\ChI_{MaX}$ diveRge As power Laws, $\chi_{max}(n)\siM N^{\Gamma'/\nu}$. The poSItIon of the fiRst Peak also apprOacHes zerO aS a pOWer laW $p_{mAx}(N)\siM N^{1/\nu}$, as SHown in fig. \[fig:FSS\] [**B**]{}, wHIch sugGEsts thaT EVeN if tHe network has boundED fLUctuations, $\langLe k^2 \ranGlE < \InFTY$, it Is aLways percoLaTed in THe thermODyNAMIc lIMit. In contrast, The position OF thE seconD pEak IS nearlY consTaNT in The range of sIzes We have conSidereD. the diveRGence of The two PeaKs iN the SUsCePtiBiLIty STrOngLY suGgests thAt We Are inDeed OBSERvinG twO difFerenT continuous phAse TranSItiOns. ThE firsT traNsItion Is betwEen noN-pErcolated/percolAted Phases, and The SeConD tRansiTIon is bEtwEen Two percOlated pHAseS wITH VeRy different internaL oRGAnIzations.

the $m$-coRE dEcOMpositioN
--------------------------

TO unDersTANd the EffeCT oF clusterIng on tHE gLoBal struCtUre of nEtWorKs, wE use tHE $m$-coRe decoMpositioN deveLOped in [@Colomer-dE-simon2013]. This procESs IS BaSEd on The Concept of edGe muLTiplIcitY $M$, wHicH Is defIned aS tHE nUMber of triangles passInG throuGh an eDge. We further dEfine the $m$-cORE As the maxImal SUbGRaph whose edges All haVe at least mULtipliciTy $m$ wiThin it. By IncreasinG $M$ From $0$ to $m_{mAx}$, wE deFinE a sET Of Nested subgrapHS That We Call the $M$-coRe decomPosItiOn oF thE nEtwork. ThiS decompoSiTiOn CaN be RepreSEnted as a BrAncHiNg pRocesS That enCodes The fRaGmENtaTion of $m$-COrES Into DiScOnneCteD cOmponEnts AS $m$ iS increaSed. The treE-liKE strUcTuRe of thiS process proviDeS informatiOn RegArding THE global oRganization of clustering IN networKs. TO visuAlizE this procEss, We use tHe LAnet-vi 3.0 tOol devElopeD iN [@CoLOMer-de-sIMoN2013] (seE tHe caption oF fIg. \[fIg:mcoRe\]). figuRe \[fig:mcOre\] shows the $m$-core deCOmpOsition of threE neTworKS WiTh $N=5\TImES 10^4$ noDeS, The SAMe degree sequencE (with $\gamma=3.1$) AnD DeGree-degree COrrElAtions, aNd diffeRent
 clustering spectrum of $c (k)=0.25$and d iff ere nt  sys temsizes, ranging from  $N=5\times 10^3$ to $ N=5\t im e s 10 ^ 5$ . Plo t [**d* * ]{ } inFi g.  \[ fi g :F SS\]sho ws that  the susce pti bi lity exhibit s  t wo peaks w hos e maxima $\c hi_ {max}$  d ive r ge as  po wer l aws, $ \ chi_{m ax}(N)\si mN ^{\gam m a'/\nu} $ .  T he p osition of the fi r st peak also appr oaches  z e ro a s a  po wer law $p _{ max}( N )\sim N ^ {1 / \ n u}$ ,  as shown inFig. \[fig: F SS\ ] [**b ** ]{} ,  which  sugg es t s t hat even if  the  networkhas bo u nded fl u ctuatio ns, $\ lan gle  k^2 \r an gle  < \in f ty $,i t i s always  p er colat ed i n t h e th erm odyn amiclimit. In con tra st,t heposit ion o f th esecon d peak  is n ea rly constant in  the  range of  si ze s w ehavec onside red . T he dive rgenceo f t he t w opeaks in the susce pt i b il ity stro ngly s u gg es t s that w eare  ind e e d obs ervi n gtwo diff erentc on ti nuous p ha se tra ns iti ons . The firs t tran sition i s bet w een non-percol a ted/percolate d  p h a se s , an d t he second t rans i tion  isb et wee n  twoperco la t ed phases with very di ff erentinter nal organizat ions.

The $ m $-core d ecom p os i tion
--------- ----- ---------- - -

To un derst and theeffect of c lusterin g o n t heglo b a lstructure ofn e twor ks , we us e t he $m$- cor e d eco mpo si tion deve loped in  [ @C ol om er- de-Si m on2013].  T his  p roc ess i s  based  on t he c on ce p t o f edgem ul t i plic it y$m$,  wh ic h isdefi n edas thenumber of  tr i angl es  p assingthrough an ed ge . We furth er  de fine t h e  $m$-cor e as the maximal subgra p h whose  ed ges a ll h ave at le ast  multi pli c ity $m $ with in it .Byi n creas i n g$m$  f rom $0$ to $ m_{ max}$ ,we d efine a  set of nested sub g rap hs that we ca llthe$ m $- cor e  d e com po s iti o n  of the network . This dec om p os ition canb e r ep resente d as abranc h ing pro cess that  encodesth e fr a g men tation of$m$-core s into di s conne c te d com pon ents a s$m$  is i ncreas e d.The t ree-li ke  struc tureof  this pr ocess provides informat ion re gardi ngthe globa l o r gan ization o f cl ustering i n n etw orks.  To visua lize th isp roces s, w e  use theL aN et- v i  3 .0 tool dev e l o ped  in [ @Co l omer-d e-Si mon2013] (see the caption of Fig . \[ f i g:m cor e \]).  F igure \[fig:mc ore \] s hows the  $ m$-core dec ompositi on of th ree ne tworks  with $ N = 5\ t imes 1 0^4$  no des, thesam ed egree s eq ue n ce (wi th $ \g amma=3 .1$) a n d de g r ee-degree correl ation s ,  andd iff erent 
 clustering_spectrum of_$c(k)=0.25$ and different system_sizes, ranging_from_$N=5\times 10^3$_to_$N=5\times 10^5$. Plot_[**d**]{} in Fig. \[fig:FSS\]_shows that the susceptibility_exhibits two peaks_whose_maxima $\chi_{max}$ diverge as power laws, $\chi_{max}(N)\sim N^{\gamma'/\nu}$. The position of the first peak_also_approaches zero_as_a_power law $p_{max}(N)\sim N^{1/\nu}$, as_shown in Fig. \[fig:FSS\] [**b**]{}, which_suggests that_even if the network has bounded fluctuations, $\langle_k^2_\rangle < \infty$,_it is always percolated in the thermodynamic limit. In_contrast, the position of the second_peak is nearly_constant_in_the range of sizes_we have considered. The divergence of_the two peaks in the susceptibility_strongly suggests that we are indeed observing_two different continuous phase transitions. The_first transition is between non-percolated/percolated_phases, and_the second transition is between_two percolated phases_with very_different internal organizations.

The_$m$-core decomposition
--------------------------

To understand the effect of_clustering on the_global structure of networks, we use_the_$m$-core decomposition developed_in [@Colomer-de-Simon2013]._This_process is_based on the_concept_of edge_multiplicity_$m$, which is defined as the_number_of triangles passing through an edge. We_further define the $m$-core_as_the maximal subgraph whose_edges all have at least_multiplicity $m$ within it. By increasing_$m$ from_$0$ to_$m_{max}$, we define a set of nested subgraphs that we call_the $m$-core decomposition of the network._This decomposition can be_represented as_a_branching process that_encodes_the fragmentation_of $m$-cores into disconnected components as $m$_is increased._The tree-like structure of this process_provides information regarding the_global_organization of clustering in networks. To_visualize this process, we use the_LaNet-vi 3.0 tool developed in [@Colomer-de-Simon2013]_(see_the_caption of Fig. \[fig:mcore\]). Figure \[fig:mcore\] shows_the $m$-core decomposition of three networks_with $N=5\times 10^4$_nodes, the same degree sequence (with $\gamma=3.1$)_and_degree-degree correlations, and different