 remaining parts, where the differentiated line appears at increasingly nested positions. We have motivated the multiloop corrections at low orders and ruled out any overcounting of diagrams. Moreover, we have put forward a simple recipe to count diagrams and numerically check that the mfRG flow generates all differentiated parquet diagrams for the vertex and self-energy, order for order in the interaction. Due to its iterative one-loop structure, the mfRG flow is well suited for efficient numerical computations. We have given a simple approximation, which renders the algebraic differential equation accessible to standard solvers for ordinary differential equations and exhibits only minor deviations from the full mfRG flow. Given the general formulation, the benefits of mfRG on physical problems can be exploited in a large number of fRG applications. The full resummation of parquet diagrams via mfRG eliminates the bias of fRG computations towards divergent ladder constructions of the vertex and restores the independence on the choice of regulator. We expect that this will generically enhance the usefulness of the truncated fRG framework and increase the robustness of the physical conclusions drawn from fRG results.

We thank S. Jakobs for pointing out the need for multiloop corrections to the self-energy flow and W. Metzner and A. Toschi for useful discussions. We acknowledge support by the Cluster of Excellence Nanosystems Initiative Munich; F.B.K. acknowledges funding from the research school IMPRS-QST.

Pseudocode implementation {#appendix1}
=========================

**Function** $f(\Lambda, \Psi$):

$S = S(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ $G = G(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ ${\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} = L( \Psi.\Gamma, S) $ ${\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma = {\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} $

${\textrm{d}}G = S + G\cdot {\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma \cdot G$ ${\textrm{d}}\gamma_r = \dot{B}_r(\Psi.\Gamma, \Psi.\Gamma, G, {\textrm{d}}G )$

/\* *jump to line 41 for one-loop fRG* \*/

${\textrm{d}}\gamma_r^{\textrm{L}} = B_r\big( \sum_{r'\neq r}{\textrm{d}}\gamma
remaining parts, where the differentiated line appear at increasingly cuddle positions. We have motivated the multiloop corrections at humble orders and ruled out any overcounting of diagram. Moreover, we have put forward a simple recipe to consider diagrams and numerically check that the mfRG menstruation generates all differentiated parquet diagram for the vertex and self - energy, order for decree in the interaction. Due to its iterative one - loop structure, the mfRG stream is well suited for efficient numerical calculation. We have given a simple approximation, which renders the algebraic differential equality accessible to standard solvers for average differential equations and exhibits only minor deviations from the broad mfRG flow. Given the general formulation, the benefits of mfRG on forcible problem can be exploited in a large number of fRG applications. The full resummation of parquet diagrams via mfRG eliminates the bias of fRG computations towards divergent run construction of the vertex and restores the independence on the option of governor. We expect that this will generically enhance the usefulness of the truncated fRG framework and increase the robustness of the forcible conclusions draw from fRG results. 

 We thank S.   Jakobs for pointing out the motivation for multiloop corrections to the self - energy flow and W.   Metzner and A.   Toschi for useful discussions. We acknowledge accompaniment by the Cluster of Excellence Nanosystems Initiative Munich; F.B.K.   acknowledges funding from the research school IMPRS - QST. 

 Pseudocode implementation { # appendix1 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 * * affair * * $ f(\Lambda, \Psi$ ): 

 $ S = S(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ $ gigabyte = G(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ $ { \textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std } } = L (\Psi.\Gamma, S) $ $ { \textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma = { \textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std } } $ 

 $ { \textrm{d}}G = S + G\cdot { \textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma \cdot G$ $ { \textrm{d}}\gamma_r = \dot{B}_r(\Psi.\Gamma, \Psi.\Gamma, G, { \textrm{d}}G) $ 

 /\ * * jump to line 41 for one - loop fRG * \*/ 

 $ { \textrm{d}}\gamma_r^{\textrm{L } } = B_r\big (\sum_{r'\neq r}{\textrm{d}}\gamma
 relaining parts, where the aifferentiated line ap'ears af increaringly nested positions. We heve notivqted the multiloop corfections wt low oederw and ruled out any overckmntiny if diagrams. Moteover, we haee put forward a snmple recipe to count diagrams and ntmericaklj check that tre mgWG fmow generates all differentiated pzrquet viagrams for thr vertex and self-energy, orfer vor order in the ijteraction. Eue ei its iteratkve one-look vtructure, jhe mfRG flow is well suited for effieient numerucql fmmputations. We hwve given a simple a[proximstion, which rekders thw algebraic differentmal equation accessifle to stdnbard solvers for ordibaey dixferantixo eduauiois znd exjibmts only mihor deviatiins from the full mgRD flow. Given tge genqrwl formulation, the benefits of mfRG on khysidal problems can be expooited in a large numher of fRD applications. The full resummation of parquet didgrama vic mfRG wllminates the bias of fRG computations towards sifeggent ladder consbructions of the vrrhec and restores the iuselendence on the chlice of reguoator. We txpecy that this will genericallt enhance thv uswfulness of the trbncated fRG yramewprk amd increase the robustnzss of the physicwl concluakons drawn from wRG rasults.

We thank S. Jakobs for pointing out the nedd fpr muleiloop corgections to the self-enerhy fllw and W. Metzjer and A. Toschi for useful discnxsions. We aclnmwlvdge suppjrt bn the Cluster os Excellence Ncnosysteis Inktiative Mlnich; F.B.K. ecknowledges funding from jhe research vchool IIPRS-WST.

Pweudocoad implementatipn {#appendpx1}
=========================

**Yunction** $d(\Lambda, \Psi$):

$S = S(\Lamnda,\Psk.\Aigma)$ $G = G(\Lambdc,\Ksi.\Wigma)$ ${\textrm{d}}\Sibma_{\gexerl{svd}} = L( \[si.\Gamma, S) $ ${\dextfm{d}}\Oxi.\Sigoa = {\texuxm{d}}\Wkgma_{\yextrm{std}} $

${\textrm{d}}G = V + G\ddot {\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigka \cdot G$ ${\jextrm{d}}\gaima_r = \dot{B}_r(\Pso.\Gamma, \Psi.\Gamma, G, {\uextrm{v}}G )$

/\* *juop to lige 41 for one-loop fRG* \*/

${\textrm{d}}\gamja_r^{\textrm{P}} = N_r\big( \sum_{r'\neq r}{\tewtrm{q}}\gamma
remaining parts, where the differentiated line appears nested We have the multiloop corrections out overcounting of diagrams. we have put a simple recipe to count diagrams numerically check that the mfRG flow generates all differentiated parquet diagrams for the and self-energy, order for order in the interaction. Due to its iterative one-loop the flow well for efficient numerical computations. We have given a simple approximation, which renders the algebraic differential equation to standard solvers for ordinary differential equations and only minor deviations from full mfRG flow. Given the formulation, benefits of on problems be exploited in large number of fRG applications. The full resummation of parquet diagrams via mfRG eliminates the bias of computations towards constructions of vertex restores independence on the regulator. We expect that this will usefulness of the truncated fRG framework and increase robustness of physical conclusions drawn from fRG results. thank S. Jakobs for pointing out the need multiloop corrections to the self-energy flow and W. Metzner and A. Toschi for useful discussions. support by the Cluster Excellence Nanosystems Initiative F.B.K. funding the school IMPRS-QST. implementation {#appendix1} ========================= **Function** $f(\Lambda, \Psi$): $S = S(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ $G = ${\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} = L( \Psi.\Gamma, S) $ ${\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma = {\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} $ S G\cdot {\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma \cdot ${\textrm{d}}\gamma_r = \dot{B}_r(\Psi.\Gamma, \Psi.\Gamma, {\textrm{d}}G /\* *jump to line one-loop \*/ \sum_{r'\neq
 remaining parts, where the difFerentiateD line AppEarS aT incReasIngly nested posITionS. We have motivated the mulTilooP cORrecTIoNs at lOw orderS AnD RUleD oUt Any OvERcOuntiNg oF diagraMs. Moreover, We hAvE put forward a SImPle recipe tO coUnt diagrams aNd nUmericAlLy cHEck thAt tHe mfRg flow gENerateS all diffeReNTiated PArquet dIAGrAms fOr the vertex and selF-EnERgy, order for ordEr in thE iNTeRACtiOn. DUe to its iteRaTive oNE-loop stRUcTURE, thE MfRG flow is welL suited for eFFicIent nuMeRicAL compuTatioNs. wE haVe given a simPle aPproximatIon, whiCH renderS The algeBraic dIffEreNtiaL EqUaTioN aCCesSIbLe tO StaNdard solVeRs For orDinaRY DIFferEntIal eQuatiOns and exhibitS onLy miNOr dEviatIons fRom tHe Full mFRG floW. GiveN tHe general formulAtioN, the benefIts Of MfRg oN physICal proBleMs cAn be expLoited iN A laRgE NUMbEr of fRG applicationS. THE FuLl resummAtion oF PaRqUEt diagraMs Via MfRG ELIminaTes tHE bIas of fRG ComputATiOnS towardS dIvergeNt LadDer ConstRUctiOns of tHe vertex And reSTores the indepeNDence on the choICe OF ReGUlatOr. WE expect that This WIll gEnerICaLly ENhancE the uSeFUlNEss of the truncated fRg fRamewoRk and Increase the roBustness of THE Physical ConcLUsIOns drawn from fRg resuLts.

We thank s. jakobs foR poinTing out tHe need for MULtiloop cOrrEctIonS to THE sElf-energy flow AND W. MeTzNer and A. tosChi for uSefUl dIscUssIoNs. We acknoWledge suPpOrT bY tHe CLusteR Of ExcellEnCe NAnOsyStems iNitiatIve MuNich; f.B.k. aCKnoWledges FUnDINg frOm ThE resEarCh SchooL IMPrs-QSt.

PseudoCode impleMenTAtioN {#aPpEndix1}
=========================

**FuNction** $f(\Lambda, \psI$):

$S = S(\Lambda,\PSi.\sigMa)$ $G = G(\LaMBDa,\Psi.\SigMa)$ ${\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} = l( \psi.\GammA, S) $ ${\tExtrm{D}}\Psi.\sigma = {\textRm{d}}\sigma_{\tExtRM{std}} $

${\teXtrm{d}}G = s + G\cdoT {\tExtRM{D}}\Psi.\SIGMa \CdoT G$ ${\Textrm{d}}\gamMA_R = \doT{B}_r(\PsI.\GAmma, \psi.\GammA, G, {\textrm{d}}G )$

/\* *jump to liNE 41 foR one-loop fRG* \*/

${\teXtrM{d}}\gaMMA_r^{\TexTRm{l}} = b_r\bIg( \SUm_{r'\NEQ r}{\textrm{d}}\gamma
 remaining parts, where th e differen tiate d l ine  a ppea rs a t increasingly nest ed positions. We havemotiv at e d th e  m ultil oop cor r ec t i ons  a tlow  o r de rs an d r uled ou t any over cou nt ing of diagr a ms . Moreover , w e have put f orw ard asi mpl e  reci peto co unt di a gramsand numer ic a lly ch e ck that t he  mfR G flow generatesa ll differentiated  parqu et di a g ram s f or the ver te x and self-en e rg y , ord e r for order i n the inter a cti on. Du etoi ts ite rativ eo ne- loop struct ure,  the mfRG  flowi s wells uited f or eff ici ent  num e ri ca l c om p uta t io ns. Wehave giv en  a  simp le a p p r o xima tio n, w hichrenders the a lge brai c  di ffere ntial  equ at ion a ccessi ble t ostandard solver s fo r ordinar y d if fer en tiale quatio nsand  exhibi ts only min or d e vi ations from the fu ll m fR G flow.Givent he  g e neral fo rm ula tion , the b enef i ts  of mfRG  on ph y si ca l probl em s canbe  ex plo itedi n alargenumber o f fRG applications.T he full resum m at i o no f pa rqu et diagrams  via mfRG  eli m in ate s  thebiasof fR G  computations towar ds  diver gentladder constr uctions of t h e vertex  and re s tores the inde pende nce on the choice o f reg ulator.We expect t hat this  wi llgen eri c a ll y enhance the u sefu ln ess ofthe  trunca ted  fR G f ram ew ork and i ncreaseth ero bu stn ess o f  the phy si cal  c onc lusio n s draw n fro m fR Gre s ult s.

Wet ha n k  S.Ja ko bs f orpo intin g ou t  th e needfor multi loo p  cor re ct ions to  the self-ene rg y flow and  W . M etzner a nd A. To schi for useful discuss i ons. We  ac knowl edge  supportbythe Cl ust e r of E xcelle nce N an osy s t ems I n i ti ati ve  Munich; F . B .K.  ackn ow ledg es fund ing from the resea r chschool IMPRS- QST .

P s e ud oco d ei mpl em e nta t i on {#appendix1} 
========= == = == ========== = 

* *F unction ** $f(\ Lambd a , \Psi$ ):

$S =S(\Lambda ,\ Psi. \ S igm a)$ $G = G (\Lambda ,\Psi.\Si g ma)$$ {\ textr m{d }}\Sig ma _{\ textr m{std} }  =L( \P si.\Ga mm a, S)$ ${\ te xtrm{d}} \Psi.\Sigma = {\textrm{ d}}\Si gma_{ \te xtrm{std} } $ 
${ \textrm{d }}G= S + G\cd ot{\t extrm {d} } \Psi. \Sig m a\cd o t G$${\t e xtrm{d}}\ g am ma_ r =\dot{B}_r(\ P s i .\G amma,  \P s i.\Gam ma,G, {\textrm{d}}G) $

/\* *jump t o li n e  41  fo r  one -l oop fRG* \*/
${\ te x t rm{d}}\g am ma_r^{\text rm{L}} =  B _ r\big ( \sum _{r'\n eq r}{\ t e xt r m{d}}\ gamm a
 remaining_parts, where_the differentiated line appears_at increasingly_nested_positions. We_have_motivated the multiloop_corrections at low_orders and ruled out_any overcounting of_diagrams._Moreover, we have put forward a simple recipe to count diagrams and numerically check_that_the mfRG_flow_generates_all differentiated parquet diagrams for_the vertex and self-energy, order_for order_in the interaction. Due to its iterative one-loop_structure,_the mfRG flow_is well suited for efficient numerical computations. We have_given a simple approximation, which renders_the algebraic differential_equation_accessible_to standard solvers for_ordinary differential equations and exhibits only_minor deviations from the full mfRG_flow. Given the general formulation, the benefits_of mfRG on physical problems can_be exploited in a large_number of_fRG applications. The full resummation_of parquet diagrams_via mfRG_eliminates the bias_of fRG computations towards divergent ladder_constructions of the_vertex and restores the independence on_the_choice of regulator._We_expect_that this_will generically enhance_the_usefulness of_the_truncated fRG framework and increase the_robustness_of the physical conclusions drawn from fRG_results.

We thank S. Jakobs for_pointing_out the need for_multiloop corrections to the self-energy_flow and W. Metzner and A. Toschi for_useful discussions._We acknowledge_support by the Cluster of Excellence Nanosystems Initiative Munich; F.B.K. acknowledges funding_from the research school IMPRS-QST.

Pseudocode implementation_{#appendix1}
=========================

**Function** $f(\Lambda, \Psi$):

$S =_S(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ $G_=_G(\Lambda,\Psi.\Sigma)$ ${\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} =_L(_\Psi.\Gamma, S)_$ ${\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma = {\textrm{d}}\Sigma_{\textrm{std}} $

${\textrm{d}}G = S_+ G\cdot_{\textrm{d}}\Psi.\Sigma \cdot G$ ${\textrm{d}}\gamma_r = \dot{B}_r(\Psi.\Gamma,_\Psi.\Gamma, G, {\textrm{d}}G )$

/\*_*jump_to line 41 for one-loop fRG*_\*/

${\textrm{d}}\gamma_r^{\textrm{L}} = B_r\big( \sum_{r'\neq r}{\textrm{d}}\gamma