 in SU(3) limit can be again from fully contracting the indices as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{app2}
g\bar{D}^{ijk}B^l_j M^m_k \epsilon_{ilm} + {\rm h.c.},\end{aligned}$$ where the Levi-Civita tensor $\epsilon_{ilm}$ is needed because the total number of index is odd. Therefore, only one type of coupling is possible in the SU(3) limit as in Eq. (\[app2\]).

After a little algebra, the following relation is obtained; $$\begin{aligned}
\label{a8}
\frac{f_{\pi^- p \Delta^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^+p\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3}
\frac{f_{K^+n\Sigma^{*-}}}{m_K}\nonumber\\
&=& \sqrt{3} \frac{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_K}=\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^0n\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}\,.\end{aligned}$$

[10]{}

M.E. McCracken [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**81**]{}, 025201 (2010).

K.-H. Glander [*et al*]{}., Eur. Phys. J. A [**19**]{}, 251 (2004).

R. K. Bradford [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**75**]{}, 035205 (2007).

K. Moriya [*et  al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**88**]{}, 045201 (2013).

P. Mattione, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. [**26**]{}, 1460101 (2014).

M. Niiyama [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**78**]{}, 035202 (2008).

K. Hicks [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. [**102**]{}, 012501 (2009).

B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong, arXiv:1611.09629 \[hep-ph\].

B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong
in SU(3) limit can be again from fully contracting the indices as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{app2 } 
 g\bar{D}^{ijk}B^l_j M^m_k \epsilon_{ilm } + { \rm h.c.},\end{aligned}$$ where the Levi - Civita tensor $ \epsilon_{ilm}$ is need because the entire number of index is odd. consequently, only one type of coupling is potential in the SU(3) terminus ad quem as in Eq. (\[app2\ ]). 

 After a little algebra, the following relation is obtained; $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{a8 } 
 \frac{f_{\pi^- p \Delta^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqrt{6 } 
 \frac{f_{K^+p\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3 } 
 \frac{f_{K^+n\Sigma^{*-}}}{m_K}\nonumber\\ 
 & = & \sqrt{3 } \frac{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_K}=\sqrt{6 } 
 \frac{f_{K^0n\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}\,.\end{aligned}$$ 

 [ 10 ] { } 

 M.E. McCracken [ * et   al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [ * * 81 * * ] { }, 025201 (2010). 

 K.-H. Glander [ * et   al * ] { }. , Eur. Phys. J. A [ * * 19 * * ] { }, 251 (2004). 

 R. K. Bradford [ * et   al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [ * * 75 * * ] { }, 035205 (2007). 

 K. Moriya [ * et   al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [ * * 88 * * ] { }, 045201 (2013). 

 P. Mattione, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. [ * * 26 * * ] { }, 1460101 (2014). 

 M. Niiyama [ * et   al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [ * * 78 * * ] { }, 035202 (2008). 

 K. Hicks [ * et   al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 102 * * ] { }, 012501 (2009). 

 B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong, arXiv:1611.09629 \[hep - ph\ ]. 

 B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong
 in SU(3) limit can be again fvom fully contraering tie indides as $$\bdgin{aligned}
\label{app2}
g\bar{D}^{ijk}B^p_j M^m_k \tisilon_{ilm} + {\rm h.c.},\end{alkgned}$$ whege the Leci-Citita tensor $\epsilon_{ilm}$ is needsf beeanse the total nomber of indax is odd. Therafurz, only one type of coupling is possifle in yhf SU(3) limit as yn Ea. (\[app2\]).

Zfter a little algebra, the followihg relauion is obtained; $$\brgin{aligned}
\label{a8}
\frac{f_{\pi^- p \Delha^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^+p\Sihma^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3}
\frqc{f_{K^+g\Wigma^{*-}}}{m_K}\nonumcer\\
&=& \sqrt{3} \fgcc{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_I}=\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^0n\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}\,.\end{aligned}$$

[10]{}

M.E. McCrccken [*et al*]{}.(COAW Clnlaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**81**]{}, 025201 (2010).

K.-H. Nkander [*et al*]{}., Eir. Phys. J. A [**19**]{}, 251 (2004).

V. K. Bcadfird [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboretion), Phys. Rev. C [**75**]{}, 035205 (2007).

K. Moriya [*ed  cl*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phts. Ree. C [**88**]{}, 045201 (2013).

P. Oqttkont, Iit. N. Mod. Ohya. Conf. Ser. [**26**]{}, 1460101 (2014).

M. Niiyamq [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaborstyin), Phys. Rev. C [**78**]{}, 035202 (2008).

K. Hychs [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. [**102**]{}, 012501 (2009).

G.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong, arXiv:1611.09629 \[hep-ph\].

B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kojg
in SU(3) limit can be again from the as $$\begin{aligned} g\bar{D}^{ijk}B^l_j M^m_k \epsilon_{ilm} Levi-Civita $\epsilon_{ilm}$ is needed the total number index is odd. Therefore, only one of coupling is possible in the SU(3) limit as in Eq. (\[app2\]). After little algebra, the following relation is obtained; $$\begin{aligned} \label{a8} \frac{f_{\pi^- p \Delta^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqrt{6} \frac{f_{K^+p\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3} &=& \frac{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_K}=\sqrt{6} [10]{} McCracken [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**81**]{}, 025201 (2010). K.-H. Glander [*et al*]{}., Eur. Phys. A [**19**]{}, 251 (2004). R. K. Bradford [*et Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 035205 (2007). K. Moriya [*et Collaboration), Rev. C 045201 P. Int. J. Mod. Conf. Ser. [**26**]{}, 1460101 (2014). M. Niiyama [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C [**78**]{}, 035202 (2008). K. [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Rev. Lett. 012501 B.-G. and K.-J. Kong, B.-G. Yu and K.-J. Kong
 in SU(3) limit can be again from fuLly contracTing tHe iNdiCeS as $$\bEgin{Aligned}
\label{apP2}
G\bar{d}^{ijk}B^l_j M^m_k \epsilon_{ilm} + {\rm H.c.},\end{AlIGned}$$ WHeRe the levi-CivITa TENsoR $\ePsIloN_{iLM}$ iS needEd bEcause tHe total numBer Of Index is odd. ThEReFore, only onE tyPe of coupling Is pOssiblE iN thE sU(3) limIt aS in Eq. (\[App2\]).

AftER a littLe algebra, ThE FollowINg relatION iS obtAined; $$\begin{aligned}
\LAbEL{a8}
\frac{f_{\pi^- p \DeltA^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqRt{6}
\FRaC{F_{k^+p\SIgmA^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3}
\fraC{f_{k^+n\SigMA^{*-}}}{m_K}\nonuMBeR\\
&=& \SQRt{3} \fRAc{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_K}=\sQrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^0n\SIGma^{*0}}}{M_K}\,.\end{aLiGneD}$$

[10]{}

m.E. McCrAcken [*Et AL*]{}.(CLaS CollaboraTion), phys. Rev. C [**81**]{}, 025201 (2010).

K.-h. GlandER [*et al*]{}., EuR. phys. J. A [**19**]{}, 251 (2004).

R. k. BradfOrd [*Et aL*]{}.(CLAs coLlAboRaTIon), pHyS. ReV. c [**75**]{}, 035205 (2007).

K. MOriya [*et  aL*]{}.(ClAs CollAborATION), PhyS. ReV. C [**88**]{}, 045201 (2013).

P. MAttioNe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. conF. Ser. [**26**]{}, 1460101 (2014).

m. niiYama [*eT al*]{}.(LEpS CoLlAboraTion), PhYs. Rev. c [**78**]{}, 035202 (2008).

K. hicks [*et al*]{}.(LEPS CoLlabOration), PhYs. REv. letT. [**102**]{}, 012501 (2009).

B.-g. Yu anD k.-J. Kong, ArXIv:1611.09629 \[hEp-ph\].

B.-G. YU and K.-J. KONg
 in SU(3) limit can be aga in from fu lly c ont rac ti ng t he i ndices as $$\b e gin{ aligned}
\label{app2}g\bar {D } ^{ij k }B ^l_jM^m_k \ e ps i l on_ {i lm } +  { \ rm  h.c. },\ end{ali gned}$$ wh ere  t he Levi-Civi t atensor $\e psi lon_{ilm}$ i s n eededbe cau s e the  to tal n umbero f inde x is odd.  T h erefor e , onlyo n etype  of coupling is p o ss i ble in the SU( 3) lim it as i n E q.(\[app2\]) .
Afte r  a litt l ea l g ebr a , the followi ng relation isobtain ed ; $ $ \begin {alig ne d }
\ label{a8}
\ frac {f_{\pi^-  p \De l ta^{++} } }{m_\pi }&=&-\ sqr t{6 }
\f r ac {f _{K ^+ p \Si g ma ^{* 0 }}} {m_K}=-\ sq rt {3}
\ frac { f _ { K^+n \Si gma^ {*-}} }{m_K}\nonumb er\ \
&= &  \s qrt{3 } \fr ac{f _{ K^0p\ Sigma^ {*+}} }{ m_K}=\sqrt{6}
\ frac {f_{K^0n\ Sig ma ^{* 0} }}{m_ K }\,.\e nd{ ali gned}$$ 

[10]{ } 

M .E . M cC racken [*et al*]{} .( C L AS  Collabo ration ) ,Ph y s. Rev.C[** 81** ] { }, 02 5201 (2 010).

K .-H. G l an de r [*etal *]{}.,  E ur.  Ph ys. J .  A [ **19** ]{}, 251  (200 4 ).

R. K. Brad f ord [*et al*] { }. ( C LA S  Col lab oration), P hys. Rev.  C [ * *7 5** ] {}, 0 35205  ( 2 00 7 ).

K. Moriya [*et a l*]{}. (CLAS  Collaboratio n), Phys.R e v . C [**8 8**] { }, 045201 (2013). 

P.Mattione,I nt. J. M od. P hys. Con f. Ser. [ * * 26**]{},  14 601 01(20 1 4 ). 

M. Niiyama[ * et a l* ]{}.(LE PSCollabo rat ion ),Phy s.  Rev. C [ **78**]{ },  0 35 20 2 ( 2008) . 

K. Hic ks  [* et  al *]{}. ( LEPS C ollab orat io n) ,  Ph ys. Rev .  L e t t. [ ** 10 2**] {},  0 12501  (20 0 9). 

B.-G.  Yu and K .-J .  Kon g,  a rXiv:16 11.09629 \[he p- ph\].

B.- G.  Yu  and K . - J. Kong
 in_SU(3) limit_can be again from_fully contracting_the_indices as_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{app2}
g\bar{D}^{ijk}B^l_j_M^m_k \epsilon_{ilm} +_{\rm h.c.},\end{aligned}$$ where_the Levi-Civita tensor $\epsilon_{ilm}$_is needed because_the_total number of index is odd. Therefore, only one type of coupling is possible_in_the SU(3)_limit_as_in Eq. (\[app2\]).

After a little_algebra, the following relation is_obtained; $$\begin{aligned}
\label{a8}
\frac{f_{\pi^-_p \Delta^{++}}}{m_\pi}&=&-\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^+p\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}=-\sqrt{3}
\frac{f_{K^+n\Sigma^{*-}}}{m_K}\nonumber\\
&=& \sqrt{3} \frac{f_{K^0p\Sigma^{*+}}}{m_K}=\sqrt{6}
\frac{f_{K^0n\Sigma^{*0}}}{m_K}\,.\end{aligned}$$

[10]{}

M.E. McCracken [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys._Rev._C [**81**]{}, 025201_(2010).

K.-H. Glander [*et al*]{}., Eur. Phys. J. A [**19**]{}, 251_(2004).

R. K. Bradford [*et al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys._Rev. C [**75**]{},_035205_(2007).

K._Moriya [*et  al*]{}.(CLAS Collaboration),_Phys. Rev. C [**88**]{}, 045201 (2013).

P._Mattione, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf._Ser. [**26**]{}, 1460101 (2014).

M. Niiyama [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration),_Phys. Rev. C [**78**]{}, 035202 (2008).

K._Hicks [*et al*]{}.(LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev._Lett. [**102**]{},_012501 (2009).

B.-G. Yu and K.-J._Kong, arXiv:1611.09629 \[hep-ph\].

B.-G._Yu and_K.-J. Kong