(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\tau_{k-1})$, for $t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_{k}]$, with $\Delta_j=\tau_{j}-\tau_{j-1}$. The inverse generator is then a linear spline of the form $$\nonumber
\varphi^{-1}(t)=\exp\left\{-\sum_{k=1}^K\theta_k w_k(t)\right\},$$ with $$w_k(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
\Delta_k, & t>\tau_k \\
t-\tau_{k-1} & t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_k] \\
0 & \mbox{otherwise} 
\end{array}\right.$$ and the corresponding Archimedean generator has the form $$\nonumber
\varphi(t)=\sum_{k=1}^K \left\{\tau_{k-1}-\frac{1}{\theta_{k}}(\log t+\vartheta_{k-1})\right\}I(\vartheta_{k-1}<-\log t\leq\vartheta_k),$$ with $\vartheta_k=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j$. To ensure convexity of the generator we further require $\theta_1\geq\theta_2\geq\cdots\geq\theta_K$. Furthermore, the Kendall’s tau has a simpler expression $$\nonumber
\kappa_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^K\left\{e^{-2\vartheta_k}(1+2\theta_k\tau_k)-e^{-2\vartheta_{k-1}}(1+2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\right\}.$$

However, it can be shown that this expression for the Kendall’s tau only allows positive values, constraining the possible associations captured by the model.

Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements.unnumbered}
================

This research was supported by *Asociación Mexicana de Cultura, A.C.*

Derivation of posterior conditional support of $\theta_k$ {#sec:appendix}
=========================================================

In order to satisfy constraint $(C1)$, we consider first the case $\theta_k\leq 0$. Therefore\
$\min_{t \in (\tau_{k-1
( t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\tau_{k-1})$, for $ t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_{k}]$, with $ \Delta_j=\tau_{j}-\tau_{j-1}$. The inverse generator is then a linear spline of the form $ $ \nonumber 
 \varphi^{-1}(t)=\exp\left\{-\sum_{k=1}^K\theta_k w_k(t)\right\},$$ with $ $ w_k(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll } 
 \Delta_k, & t>\tau_k \\ 
 t-\tau_{k-1 } & t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_k ] \\ 
 0 & \mbox{otherwise } 
 \end{array}\right.$$ and the corresponding Archimedean generator take the human body $ $ \nonumber 
 \varphi(t)=\sum_{k=1}^K \left\{\tau_{k-1}-\frac{1}{\theta_{k}}(\log t+\vartheta_{k-1})\right\}I(\vartheta_{k-1}<-\log t\leq\vartheta_k),$$ with $ \vartheta_k=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j$. To ensure convexity of the generator we further ask $ \theta_1\geq\theta_2\geq\cdots\geq\theta_K$. Furthermore, the Kendall ’s tau has a simpler construction $ $ \nonumber 
 \kappa_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^K\left\{e^{-2\vartheta_k}(1 + 2\theta_k\tau_k)-e^{-2\vartheta_{k-1}}(1 + 2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\right\}.$$ 

 However, it can be show that this expression for the Kendall ’s tau merely allows positive value, constraining the possible association capture by the model. 

 recognition { # acknowledgements.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 This research was supported by * Asociación Mexicana de Cultura, A.C. * 

 deriving of posterior conditional support of $ \theta_k$ { # sec: appendix } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In order to meet constraint $ (C1)$, we consider first the font $ \theta_k\leq 0$. Therefore\ 
 $ \min_{t \in (\tau_{k-1
(t)=\sul_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\tam_{k-1})$, for $t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tao_{k}]$, with $\Velta_j=\tzu_{j}-\tau_{j-1}$. Ghe inverse generator is thei a oineae spline of the form $$\nunumber
\vagphi^{-1}(t)=\exp\lwft\{-\snm_{k=1}^K\theta_k w_k(t)\rijgt\},$$ with $$w_k(t)=\lerb\{\begiu{acray}{ll}
\Delta_k, & t>\jau_k \\
t-\tau_{k-1} & d\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_k] \\
0 & \kbux{ltherwise} 
\end{array}\right.$$ and the corwespondonh Archimedean denegaeor gas the form $$\nonumber
\varphi(t)=\sum_{k=1}^K \meft\{\tau_{n-1}-\frac{1}{\theta_{k}}(\lob t+\vartheta_{k-1})\right\}I(\vartheta_{n-1}<-\log t\leq\vartheta_k),$$ witj $\vartheta_k=\wum_{j=1}^{h}\rheta_j\Delta_j$. To ensure convexity or the generator we further requkre $\tketa_1\geq\thetq_2\gwq\cfmts\geq\theta_J$. Furnhermore, the Kendall’s tau hax a simpler exiressmon $$\bonumber
\kappa_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^K\neft\{e^{-2\vartheta_k}(1+2\thetw_k\tau_k)-e^{-2\vastketa_{k-1}}(1+2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\right\}.$$

Hiwwver, ht cdn bd shuwn tiat this fxpcession for the Kendalo’s tau only allows kosynove values, cknstraynyng the possible associations captured ty fhe model.

Acknowledgemenrs {#acknowledgements.unjumbered}
================

Tris research was supported by *Asociación Mexicana ge Cumgurc, A.C.*

Defuvwtion of posterior conditional support of $\theez_k$ {#svc:appendix}
=========================================================

In ordev to satisfy consttalny $(C1)$, we considet first ths case $\theta_k\leq 0$. Hherefote\
$\min_{t \in (\tau_{k-1
(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\tau_{k-1})$, for $t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_{k}]$, with $\Delta_j=\tau_{j}-\tau_{j-1}$. The inverse then linear spline the form $$\nonumber & \\ t-\tau_{k-1} & \\ 0 & \end{array}\right.$$ and the corresponding Archimedean generator the form $$\nonumber \varphi(t)=\sum_{k=1}^K \left\{\tau_{k-1}-\frac{1}{\theta_{k}}(\log t+\vartheta_{k-1})\right\}I(\vartheta_{k-1}<-\log t\leq\vartheta_k),$$ with $\vartheta_k=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j$. To ensure convexity of generator we further require $\theta_1\geq\theta_2\geq\cdots\geq\theta_K$. Furthermore, the Kendall’s tau has a simpler expression \kappa_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^K\left\{e^{-2\vartheta_k}(1+2\theta_k\tau_k)-e^{-2\vartheta_{k-1}}(1+2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\right\}.$$ it be that this expression for the Kendall’s tau only allows positive values, constraining the possible associations captured the model. Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements.unnumbered} ================ This research was by *Asociación Mexicana de A.C.* Derivation of posterior conditional of {#sec:appendix} ========================================================= order satisfy $(C1)$, we consider the case $\theta_k\leq 0$. Therefore\ $\min_{t \in (\tau_{k-1
(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\Tau_{k-1})$, for $t\in(\Tau_{k-1},\tAu_{k}]$, WitH $\DElta_J=\tau_{J}-\tau_{j-1}$. The inversE GeneRator is then a linear spliNe of tHe FOrm $$\nONuMber
\vArphi^{-1}(t)=\eXP\lEFT\{-\suM_{k=1}^k\tHetA_k W_K(t)\Right\},$$ WitH $$w_k(t)=\lefT\{\begin{arraY}{ll}
\deLta_k, & t>\tau_k \\
t-\taU_{K-1} & t\In(\tau_{k-1},\tau_k] \\
0 & \MboX{otherwise} 
\enD{arRay}\rigHt.$$ And THe corResPondiNg ArchIMedean Generator HaS The forM $$\NonumbeR
\VArPhi(t)=\Sum_{k=1}^K \left\{\tau_{k-1}-\frac{1}{\THeTA_{k}}(\log t+\vartheta_{K-1})\right\}i(\vARtHETa_{k-1}<-\Log T\leq\vartheTa_K),$$ with $\VArtheta_K=\SuM_{J=1}^{K}\TheTA_j\Delta_j$. To ensUre convexitY Of tHe geneRaTor WE furthEr reqUiRE $\thEta_1\geq\theta_2\Geq\cDots\geq\thEta_K$. FuRThermorE, The KendAll’s taU haS a sImplER eXpResSiON $$\noNUmBer
\KAppA_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^k\lEfT\{e^{-2\varThetA_K}(1+2\THEta_k\Tau_K)-e^{-2\vaRthetA_{k-1}}(1+2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\rIghT\}.$$

HowEVer, It can Be shoWn thAt This eXpressIon foR tHe Kendall’s tau onLy alLows positIve VaLueS, cOnstrAIning tHe pOssIble assOciatioNS caPtURED bY the model.

AcknowledGeMENtS {#acknowlEdgemeNTs.UnNUmbered}
================

THiS reSearCH Was suPporTEd By *AsociaCión MeXIcAnA de CultUrA, A.C.*

DerIvAtiOn oF postERior ConditIonal supPort oF $\Theta_k$ {#sec:appenDIx}
=========================================================

In order to saTIsFY CoNStraInt $(c1)$, we consider FirsT The cAse $\tHEtA_k\lEQ 0$. TherEfore\
$\MiN_{T \iN (\Tau_{k-1
(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j \Delta_j+\ theta _{k }(t -\ tau_ {k-1 })$, for $t\in ( \tau _{k-1},\tau_{k}]$, wit h $\D el t a_j= \ ta u_{j} -\tau_{ j -1 } $ . T he  i nve rs e  g enera tor  is the n a linear  sp li ne of the fo r m$$\nonumbe r
\ varphi^{-1}( t)= \exp\l ef t\{ - \sum_ {k= 1}^K\ theta_ k  w_k(t )\right\} ,$ $  with$ $w_k(t) = \ le ft\{ \begin{array}{ll} \D e lta_k, & t>\ta u_k \\ 
t - \t a u _{k -1}  & t\in(\t au _{k-1 } ,\tau_k ]  \ \ 0  &\ mbox{otherwis e} 
\end{ar r ay} \right .$ $ a n d thecorre sp o ndi ng Archimed eangenerator  has t h e form$ $\nonum ber
\v arp hi( t)=\ s um _{ k=1 }^ K  \l e ft \{\ t au_ {k-1}-\f ra c{ 1}{\t heta _ { k } }(\l ogt+\v arthe ta_{k-1})\rig ht\ }I(\ v art heta_ {k-1} <-\l og  t\le q\vart heta_ k) ,$$ with $\vart heta _k=\sum_{ j=1 }^ {k} \t heta_ j \Delta _j$ . T o ensur e conve x ity  o f t he  generator we furt he r re quire $\ theta_ 1 \g eq \ theta_2\ ge q\c dots \ g eq\th eta_ K $.  Further more,t he  K endall’ stau ha sa s imp ler e x pres sion $ $\nonumb er
\k a ppa_\tau=1+\su m _{k=1}^K\left \ {e ^ { -2 \ vart het a_k}(1+2\th eta_ k \tau _k)- e ^{ -2\ v arthe ta_{k -1 } }( 1 +2\theta_k\tau_{k-1 }) \right \}.$$ 

However, it  can be sh o w n  that th is e x pr e ssion for theKenda ll’s tau o n ly allow s pos itive va lues, con s t rainingthe  po ssi ble a ss ociations cap t u redby  the mo del .

Ackn owl edg eme nts  { #acknowle dgements .u nn um be red }
=== = ======== == ==
T his  rese a rch wa s sup port ed  b y  *A sociaci ó nM e xica na  d e Cu ltu ra , A.C .*
D eri vationof poster ior cond it io nal sup port of $\the ta _k$ {#sec: ap pen dix}
= = = ======== ======================= = ======= === ===== ==== ===

In o rde r to s ati s fy con strain t $(C 1) $,w e  cons i d er  fi rs t the case $ \th eta_k \l eq 0 $. Ther efore\
$\min_{t \i n  (\ tau_{k-1
(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j+\theta_{k}(t-\tau_{k-1})$, for_$t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_{k}]$, with_$\Delta_j=\tau_{j}-\tau_{j-1}$. The inverse generator_is then_a_linear spline_of_the form $$\nonumber
\varphi^{-1}(t)=\exp\left\{-\sum_{k=1}^K\theta_k_w_k(t)\right\},$$ with $$w_k(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
\Delta_k,_& t>\tau_k \\
t-\tau_{k-1} &_t\in(\tau_{k-1},\tau_k] \\
0 &_\mbox{otherwise}_
\end{array}\right.$$ and the corresponding Archimedean generator has the form $$\nonumber
\varphi(t)=\sum_{k=1}^K \left\{\tau_{k-1}-\frac{1}{\theta_{k}}(\log t+\vartheta_{k-1})\right\}I(\vartheta_{k-1}<-\log t\leq\vartheta_k),$$ with_$\vartheta_k=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\theta_j\Delta_j$._To ensure_convexity_of_the generator we further require_$\theta_1\geq\theta_2\geq\cdots\geq\theta_K$. Furthermore, the Kendall’s tau_has a_simpler expression $$\nonumber
\kappa_\tau=1+\sum_{k=1}^K\left\{e^{-2\vartheta_k}(1+2\theta_k\tau_k)-e^{-2\vartheta_{k-1}}(1+2\theta_k\tau_{k-1})\right\}.$$

However, it can be shown that_this_expression for the_Kendall’s tau only allows positive values, constraining the possible_associations captured by the model.

Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements.unnumbered}
================

This_research was supported_by_*Asociación_Mexicana de Cultura, A.C.*

Derivation_of posterior conditional support of $\theta_k$_{#sec:appendix}
=========================================================

In order to satisfy constraint $(C1)$,_we consider first the case $\theta_k\leq 0$._Therefore\
$\min_{t \in (\tau_{k-1