/3)$ were chosen. We modeled the clutter discretely from all azimuth angles from $-\pi/2\mbox{ to } \pi/2$ in discrete increments of $-0.005\pi/2$ radians. The clutter patches were fixed at an elevation angle of $\pi/4$ radians. The target was assumed to be at $\theta_t=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with normalized Doppler equal to 0.31 and $\theta_t=0,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with normalized Doppler equal to -0.4 in Fig\[fig9\](a)(b), respectively. The adapted patterns in Fig. \[fig9\] are identical (upto a scaling) to those obtained from the classical STAP adapted pattern. This is not a surprise but is rather reassuring since the waveform in affects all the Doppler frequencies and the azimuths identically. Moreover, we can always consider $\mathbf{s}_o \otimes \mathbf{a}(\theta,\phi)$ as a new /modified spatial steering vector. Hence as expected the inclusion of the optimal waveform will not alter the shape of the classical STAP adapted pattern.

Detection
---------

Here, we investigate the impact of detection using the optimized waveforms and randomly selected waveforms. The detection test for the presence of a target at a particular range cell is cast as a binary hypothesis test, $$\label{eq61}
\begin{aligned}
&\mathcal{H}_0 \,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u} \,\,\,
&\mathcal{H}_1\,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y}+\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u}
\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathbf{y},$ $\mathbf{y_u}$ have been been defined in,. Assuming that $\mathbf{y_u}$ is complex normal distributed, the test in is readily evaluated. The weight vector is obtained after the optimization. The ROC curves for SINRs 0dB, 3dB and 6dB are shown in Fig. \[fig10\](a)(b) for the non const. modulus and const. modulus design, respectively. For generating Fig. \[fig10\](a), a random waveform was used having the same energy as that obtained after the alternating
/3)$ were chosen. We modeled the clutter discretely from all azimuth angles from $ -\pi/2\mbox { to } \pi/2 $ in discrete increments of $ -0.005\pi/2 $ radian. The clutter eyepatch were fixed at an aggrandizement slant of $ \pi/4 $ radians. The target was assumed to be at $ \theta_t=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4 $ with normalize Doppler equal to 0.31 and $ \theta_t=0,\phi_t=\pi/4 $ with normalized Doppler adequate to -0.4 in Fig\[fig9\](a)(b), respectively. The adapt patterns in Fig.   \[fig9\ ] are identical (upto a scaling) to those prevail from the classical STAP adapted radiation pattern. This is not a surprise but is rather reassuring since the waveform in affects all the Doppler frequencies and the azimuths identically. furthermore, we can always consider $ \mathbf{s}_o \otimes \mathbf{a}(\theta,\phi)$ as a new /modified spatial guidance vector. Hence as expected the inclusion of the optimal waveform will not change the shape of the classical STAP adapted pattern. 

 Detection 
 --------- 

 Here, we investigate the impact of signal detection using the optimized waveforms and randomly selected waveforms. The detection trial for the presence of a target at a particular range cell is cast as a binary hypothesis test, $ $ \label{eq61 } 
 \begin{aligned } 
 & \mathcal{H}_0 \,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u } \,\,\, 
 & \mathcal{H}_1\,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y}+\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u } 
 \end{aligned}$$ where $ \mathbf{y},$ $ \mathbf{y_u}$ have been been defined in, . Assuming that $ \mathbf{y_u}$ is complex normal distribute, the test in is readily evaluate. The system of weights vector is obtained after the optimization. The ROC curves for SINRs 0dB, 3dB and 6dB are shown in Fig.   \[fig10\](a)(b) for the non const. modulus and const. modulus design, respectively. For generate Fig.   \[fig10\](a), a random waveform was used having the same department of energy as that obtained after the alternating
/3)$ wege chosen. We modeled the clutter discrejeoy frok all zzimuth xngles from $-\pi/2\mbox{ to } \pi/2$ in duscreuv increments of $-0.005\pi/2$ raaians. The clutter patrhes were fixed ef an elcratioh angnx of $\pi/4$ radians. The targed was assumed do bz at $\theta_t=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with normalized Do[pler eauwl to 0.31 and $\theja_t=0,\php_t=\[i/4$ wjnh normalized Doppler equal to -0.4 in Fig\[hig9\](a)(b), respectivrly. The adapted patterns ij Fih. \[fig9\] are identical (upto a scaoing) ro those obtxined from the classiczl STAP adapted pattern. This is not c surprise vur id rather reawsurigg since the wavefork in afgects all the Cop'ler frequencies and the ezimuths identically. Moreover, wz can always consider $\mqthbf{v}_o \odimer \maghbr{a}(\vhefa,\phi)$ ws e new /modifjed spatial steering vector. Hemcq as expected fhe insltsion of the optimal waveform will not dltsr the shape of the clawsical STAP adapted pwttern.

Detqction
---------

Here, we investigate the impact of detection usinj ghe oitimkzef waveforms and randomly selected waveforms. Trs cenection test for bhe presence of a yaggrj at a particuuar raufe cell is cast as a binary hyporhesis teft, $$\lsbel{eq61}
\begin{aligned}
&\mathcal{H}_0 \,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bag{\matybf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{v_u} \,\,\,
&\mathcal{H}_1\,\, : \matnbf{w}^H\nar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathby{y}+\mathgf{w}^H\mathbf{y_k}
\end{alignsa}$$ where $\mathbf{y},$ $\oatmbf{f_u}$ have been been defined yn,. Assumiig thct $\mathbw{y_u}$ os com[lex normap disbsibuted, the test ij is teadilf evaluatef. The weight vector is obtained after the optomhzanion. The XOC cuvves for SINRs 0qB, 3dB and 6dB ate shown nn Fig. \[wig10\](a)(b) for nhe non cmnst. moduluf and const. mmfulus design, respectyvelt. Foe generxging Fig. \[fig10\](a), a random wcreform waw used having the xamg snergy as that ibtqined after the algerganinj
/3)$ were chosen. We modeled the clutter all angles from to } \pi/2$ radians. clutter patches were at an elevation of $\pi/4$ radians. The target was to be at $\theta_t=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with normalized Doppler equal to 0.31 and $\theta_t=0,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with Doppler equal to -0.4 in Fig\[fig9\](a)(b), respectively. The adapted patterns in Fig. \[fig9\] identical a to obtained from the classical STAP adapted pattern. This is not a surprise but is rather reassuring the waveform in affects all the Doppler frequencies the azimuths identically. Moreover, can always consider $\mathbf{s}_o \otimes as new /modified steering Hence expected the inclusion the optimal waveform will not alter the shape of the classical STAP adapted pattern. Detection --------- Here, investigate the detection using optimized and selected waveforms. The for the presence of a target range cell is cast as a binary hypothesis $$\label{eq61} \begin{aligned} \,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u} \,\,\, &\mathcal{H}_1\,\, : \end{aligned}$$ where $\mathbf{y},$ $\mathbf{y_u}$ have been been defined Assuming that $\mathbf{y_u}$ is complex normal distributed, the test in is readily evaluated. The weight obtained after the optimization. ROC curves for 0dB, and are in Fig. for the non const. modulus and const. modulus design, respectively. For Fig. \[fig10\](a), a random waveform was used having the same that after the alternating
/3)$ were chosen. We modeled the cluTter discreTely fRom All AzImutH angLes from $-\pi/2\mbox{ tO } \Pi/2$ in Discrete increments of $-0.005\pi/2$ RadiaNs. tHe clUTtEr patChes werE FiXED at An ElEvaTiON aNgle oF $\pi/4$ Radians. the target wAs aSsUmed to be at $\thETa_T=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4$ witH noRmalized DoppLer Equal tO 0.31 aNd $\tHEta_t=0,\pHi_t=\Pi/4$ witH normaLIzed DoPpler equaL tO -0.4 In Fig\[fIG9\](a)(b), respECTiVely. the adapted patternS In fIg. \[fig9\] are identiCal (uptO a SCaLINg) tO thOse obtaineD fRom thE ClassicAL Stap AdaPTed pattern. ThiS is not a surpRIse But is rAtHer REassurIng siNcE The Waveform in aFfecTs all the DOppler FRequencIEs and thE azimuThs IdeNticALlY. MOreOvER, we CAn AlwAYs cOnsider $\mAtHbF{s}_o \otImes \MATHBf{a}(\tHetA,\phi)$ As a neW /modified spatIal SteeRIng VectoR. HencE as eXpEcted The incLusioN oF the optimal waveForm Will not alTer ThE shApE of thE ClassiCal sTAp adapteD patterN.

detEcTION
---------

HEre, we investigate thE iMPAcT of detecTion usINg ThE OptimizeD wAveFormS ANd ranDomlY SeLected waVeformS. thE dEtectioN tEst for ThE prEseNce of A TargEt at a pArticulaR rangE Cell is cast as a bINary hypothesiS TeST, $$\LaBEl{eq61}
\BegIn{aligned}
&\maThcaL{h}_0 \,\, : \matHbf{w}^h\BaR{\maTHbf{y}}=\mAthbf{W}^H\MAtHBf{y_u} \,\,\,
&\mathcal{H}_1\,\, : \mathbf{w}^h\bAr{\mathBf{y}}=\maThbf{w}^H\mathbf{y}+\Mathbf{w}^H\maTHBF{y_u}
\end{alIgneD}$$ WhERe $\mathbf{y},$ $\mathbF{y_u}$ haVe been been DEfined in,. assumIng that $\mAthbf{y_u}$ is COMplex norMal DisTriButED, ThE test in is readILY evaLuAted. The WeiGht vectOr iS obTaiNed AfTer the optImizatioN. THe rOc cUrvEs for siNRs 0dB, 3dB AnD 6dB ArE shOwn in fIg. \[fig10\](a)(B) for tHe noN cOnST. moDulus anD CoNST. modUlUs DesiGn, rEsPectiVely. fOr gEneratiNg Fig. \[fig10\](a), A raNDom wAvEfOrm was uSed having the sAmE energy as tHaT obTained AFTer the alTernating
/3)$ were chosen. We model ed the clu tterdis cre te ly f romall azimuth an g lesfrom $-\pi/2\mbox{ to} \pi /2 $  ind is crete  increm e nt s of$- 0. 005 \p i /2 $ rad ian s. Theclutter pa tch es  were fixeda tan elevati onangle of $\p i/4 $ radi an s.T he ta rge t was  assum e d to b e at $\th et a _t=0.7 , \phi_t= \ p i/ 4$ w ith normalized Do p pl e r equal to 0.3 1 and$\ t he t a _t= 0,\ phi_t=\pi/ 4$  with normali z ed D o ppl e r equal to -0 .4 in Fig\[ f ig9 \](a)( b) , r e specti vely.  T h e a dapted patt erns  in Fig.\[fig9 \ ] are i d entical  (upto  asca ling )  t otho se obt a in edf rom  the cla ss ic al ST AP a d a p t ed p att ern.  This  is not a sur pri se b u t i s rat her r eass ur ing s ince t he wa ve form in affects  all  the Dopp ler  f req ue ncies and th e a zim uths id entical l y.Mo r e o ve r, we can always c on s i de r $\math bf{s}_ o  \ ot i mes \mat hb f{a }(\t h e ta,\p hi)$ as  a new / modifi e dsp atial s te eringve cto r.Hence as e xpecte d the in clusi o n of the optim a l waveform wi l ln o ta lter  th e shape ofthec lass ical ST APa dapte d pat te r n. 
Detection
-------- -
Here,  we i nvestigate th e impact o f d etection  usi n gt he optimized w avefo rms and ra n domly se lecte d wavefo rms. Thed e tectiontes t f orthe p re sence of a ta r g et a ta parti cul ar rang e c ell  is  ca st  as a bin ary hypo th es is  t est , $$\ l abel{eq6 1} 
\b eg in{ align e d}
&\m athca l{H} _0  \ , \,: \math b f{ w } ^H\b ar {\ math bf{ y} }=\ma thbf { w}^ H\mathb f{y_u} \, \,\ , 
&\m at hc al{H}_1 \,\, : \mathb f{ w}^H\bar{\ ma thb f{y}}= \ m athbf{w} ^H\mathbf{y}+\mathbf{w} ^ H\mathb f{y _u}
\ end{ aligned}$ $ w here $ \ma t hbf{y} ,$ $\m athbf {y _u} $ haveb e en  be en  defined i n , . A ssumi ng  tha t $\mat hbf{y_u}$ is compl e x n ormal distrib ute d, t h e  t est in isre a dil y evaluated. Theweight vec to r  i s obtained aft er  the op timizat ion.T he ROCcurves fo r SINRs 0 dB , 3d B and  6dB are s hown inFig. \[fi g 10\]( a )( b) fo r t he non  c ons t. mo dulusa ndconst . modu lu s desi gn, r es pectivel y. For generating Fig.\[fig1 0\](a ),a randomwav e for m was use d ha ving the s ame  en ergyast hat o btai n ed  af t er th e al t ernating
/3)$ were_chosen. We_modeled the clutter discretely_from all_azimuth_angles from_$-\pi/2\mbox{_to } \pi/2$_in discrete increments_of $-0.005\pi/2$ radians. The_clutter patches were_fixed_at an elevation angle of $\pi/4$ radians. The target was assumed to be at_$\theta_t=0.7,\phi_t=\pi/4$_with normalized_Doppler_equal_to 0.31 and $\theta_t=0,\phi_t=\pi/4$ with_normalized Doppler equal to -0.4_in Fig\[fig9\](a)(b),_respectively. The adapted patterns in Fig. \[fig9\] are identical_(upto_a scaling) to_those obtained from the classical STAP adapted pattern. This_is not a surprise but is_rather reassuring since_the_waveform_in affects all the_Doppler frequencies and the azimuths identically._Moreover, we can always consider $\mathbf{s}_o_\otimes \mathbf{a}(\theta,\phi)$ as a new /modified spatial_steering vector. Hence as expected the_inclusion of the optimal waveform_will not_alter the shape of the_classical STAP adapted_pattern.

Detection
---------

Here, we_investigate the impact_of detection using the optimized waveforms_and randomly selected_waveforms. The detection test for the_presence_of a target_at_a_particular range_cell is cast_as_a binary_hypothesis_test, $$\label{eq61}
\begin{aligned}
&\mathcal{H}_0 \,\, : \mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u} \,\,\,
&\mathcal{H}_1\,\,_:_\mathbf{w}^H\bar{\mathbf{y}}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y}+\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{y_u}
\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathbf{y},$ $\mathbf{y_u}$ have been been_defined in,. Assuming that_$\mathbf{y_u}$_is complex normal distributed,_the test in is readily_evaluated. The weight vector is obtained_after the_optimization. The_ROC curves for SINRs 0dB, 3dB and 6dB are shown in_Fig. \[fig10\](a)(b) for the non const. modulus_and const. modulus design,_respectively. For_generating_Fig. \[fig10\](a), a random_waveform_was used_having the same energy as that obtained_after the_alternating