in N$ and $X\not= O$ such that $$\label{defRST}
|Y| < |X| \; \mbox{ and } \; N \cap B(O,|X|) \cap B(X,|X-Y|) = \emptyset$$ (where $B(c,r)$ denotes the open ball with center $c$ and radius $r$). For any $X\in N\setminus\{O\}$, there is a.s. only one $Y\in N$ satisfying (\[defRST\]). Among the vertices of $N\cap B(O,|X|)$, this is the closest to $X$. This vertex is denoted by $\A(X)$ and called the *ancestor* of $X$. With an abuse of notation, for an edge $e$, we call ancestor of the edge the endpoint that is the ancestor of the other endpoint, which we call the descendant of the edge. The ancestor of $e$ is the endpoint of $e$ that is closer from $O$. With probability $1$, the graph $\mathcal{T}$ admits a tree structure (there is no loop) rooted at the origin $O$. For convenience, we set $\A(O)=O$.

A sequence $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ of vertices of $N$ is a semi-infinite path of the RST $\mathcal{T}$ if, for any $n$, $X_{n}$ is the ancestor of $X_{n+1}$. A semi-infinite path $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ has asymptotic direction $\theta\in [0,2\pi)$ if $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{X_{n}}{|X_{n}|} = e^{\i\theta}$$ (by identifying $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ with the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$).\
Radial random trees in the plane have been studied in many other papers, including Pimentel [@pimentel], Bonichon and Marckert [@bonichonmarckert] or Norris and Turner [@norristurner]. The main difficulty in the case of the RST, is that the local rule used for selecting the ancestor implies complex dependences. The latter make it difficult to exhibit natural Markov processes and prevent a direct use of martingale convergence theorems or Lyapunov functions.

However, our study can rely
in N$ and $ X\not= O$ such that $ $ \label{defRST } 
 |Y| < |X| \; \mbox { and } \; N \cap B(O,|X|) \cap B(X,|X - Y|) = \emptyset$$ (where $ B(c, r)$ denotes the open ball with center $ c$ and spoke $ r$). For any $ X\in N\setminus\{O\}$, there be a.s. only one $ Y\in N$ satisfying (\[defRST\ ]). Among the vertex of $ N\cap B(O,|X|)$, this is the close to $ X$. This vertex is denoted by $ \A(X)$ and called the * ancestor * of $ X$. With an misuse of note, for an edge $ e$, we call ancestor of the edge the endpoint that is the ancestor of the other end point, which we call the descendant of the edge. The ancestor of $ e$ is the endpoint of $ e$ that is closer from $ O$. With probability $ 1 $, the graph $ \mathcal{T}$ accommodate a tree structure (there is no loop) rooted at the origin $ O$. For public toilet, we set $ \A(O)=O$. 

 A sequence $ (X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ of vertices of $ N$ is a semi - countless path of the RST $ \mathcal{T}$ if, for any $ n$, $ X_{n}$ is the ancestor of $ X_{n+1}$. A semi - infinite way $ (X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ has asymptotic guidance $ \theta\in [ 0,2\pi)$ if $ $ \lim_{n\to\infty } \frac{X_{n}}{|X_{n}| } = e^{\i\theta}$$ (by identifying $ \mathbb{R}^{2}$ with the complex plane $ \mathbb{C}$).\ 
 Radial random trees in the plane have been studied in many early papers, including Pimentel [ @pimentel ], Bonichon and Marckert [ @bonichonmarckert ] or Norris and Turner [ @norristurner ]. The main difficulty in the case of the RST, is that the local rule use for choose the ancestor implies complex dependences. The latter make it difficult to exhibit natural Markov processes and prevent a lineal use of dolphin striker convergence theorems or Lyapunov routine. 

 However, our study can rely
in J$ and $X\not= O$ such that $$\lxbel{defRST}
|Y| < |X| \; \mbox{ aid } \; N \dap B(O,|X|) \zap B(X,|X-Y|) = \emptyset$$ (where $B(c,r)$ dwnotew the open ball with cdnter $c$ ajd radiuw $r$). Hor any $X\in N\setminus\{O\}$, tmzre ia a.s. mily one $Y\in N$ sstisfying (\[gefRST\]). Among tve vzrtices of $N\cap B(O,|X|)$, this is the closqst to $C$. Hhis vertex is denpeed gj $\C(X)$ and called the *ancestor* of $X$. With ai abuse of notayion, for an edge $e$, we call ancfstor of the edge hhe endpoinj thwr is the ancdstor of the other endkoint, which we call the descendavt of the edge. Jkw ajwestor of $e$ is tre endpoint of $e$ thad is clpser from $O$. Wibh prmbavility $1$, the graph $\matical{T}$ admits a tree ftructure (tkere is no loop) rootee qt thg oricin $U$. Fof ckntenjence, ae aet $\A(O)=O$.

A ssquence $(X_{n})_{n\teq 0}$ of vertices of $N$ px a semi-infihite pwtr of the RST $\mathcal{T}$ if, for any $n$, $X_{n}$ iv tge ancestor of $X_{n+1}$. A semu-infinite path $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ has asyiptotic direction $\theta\in [0,2\pi)$ if $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{X_{t}}{|X_{n}|} = x^{\i\gheua}$$ (by iawnhifying $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ with the complex plane $\mathbb{S}$).\
Dacisl random treef in the plsnf nwve been studked in mahy other papers, influding Pimebtel [@pimegtel], Bonichon and Marckert [@bonixhonmarckert] ir Norris and Turnzr [@norristuruer]. Thg main difficulty in the case of fhe RST, is hhat the mucal rule used fur xenecting ufe ancestor impliqs complee depzndences. The lattew make it fiffigglt to exhibit natkral Laskov procedses and prevent a direct use oh martingale votveggence thzorems or Lyapunov sunctions.

Howevgr, our stbdy cav rely
in N$ and $X\not= O$ such that < \; \mbox{ } \; N \emptyset$$ $B(c,r)$ denotes the ball with center and radius $r$). For any $X\in there is a.s. only one $Y\in N$ satisfying (\[defRST\]). Among the vertices of B(O,|X|)$, this is the closest to $X$. This vertex is denoted by $\A(X)$ called *ancestor* $X$. an abuse of notation, for an edge $e$, we call ancestor of the edge the endpoint is the ancestor of the other endpoint, which call the descendant of edge. The ancestor of $e$ the of $e$ is from With probability $1$, graph $\mathcal{T}$ admits a tree structure (there is no loop) rooted at the origin $O$. For convenience, set $\A(O)=O$. $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ vertices $N$ a semi-infinite path RST $\mathcal{T}$ if, for any $n$, ancestor of $X_{n+1}$. A semi-infinite path $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ asymptotic direction [0,2\pi)$ if $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{X_{n}}{|X_{n}|} = e^{\i\theta}$$ identifying $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ with the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$).\ Radial trees in the plane have been studied in many other papers, including Pimentel [@pimentel], Bonichon [@bonichonmarckert] or Norris and [@norristurner]. The main in case the is that local rule used for selecting the ancestor implies complex dependences. The make it difficult to exhibit natural Markov processes and prevent use martingale convergence theorems Lyapunov functions. However, our can
in N$ and $X\not= O$ such that $$\label{dEfRST}
|Y| < |X| \; \mboX{ and } \; N \Cap b(O,|X|) \CaP B(X,|X-y|) = \empTyset$$ (where $B(c,r)$ dENoteS the open ball with center $C$ and rAdIUs $r$). FOR aNy $X\in n\setminUS\{O\}$, THEre Is A.s. OnlY oNE $Y\In N$ saTisFying (\[deFRST\]). Among tHe vErTices of $N\cap B(o,|x|)$, tHis is the clOseSt to $X$. This verTex Is denoTeD by $\a(x)$ and cAllEd the *AncestOR* of $X$. WiTh an abuse Of NOtatioN, For an edGE $E$, wE calL ancestor of the edgE ThE Endpoint that is The ancEsTOr OF The OthEr endpoint, WhIch we CAll the dEScENDAnt OF the edge. The anCestor of $e$ is THe eNdpoinT oF $e$ tHAt is clOser fRoM $o$. WiTh probabiliTy $1$, thE graph $\matHcal{T}$ aDMits a trEE structUre (theRe iS no Loop) ROoTeD at ThE OriGIn $o$. FoR ConVenience, We SeT $\A(O)=O$.

A SequENCE $(x_{n})_{n\gEq 0}$ oF verTices Of $N$ is a semi-infIniTe paTH of The RSt $\mathCal{T}$ If, For anY $n$, $X_{n}$ is The anCeStor of $X_{n+1}$. A semi-inFiniTe path $(X_{n})_{n\Geq 0}$ HaS asYmPtotiC DirectIon $\TheTa\in [0,2\pi)$ iF $$\lim_{n\to\INftY} \fRAC{x_{n}}{|x_{n}|} = e^{\i\theta}$$ (by identifYiNG $\MaThbb{R}^{2}$ witH the coMPlEx PLane $\mathBb{c}$).\
RaDial RANdom tRees IN tHe plane hAve beeN StUdIed in maNy Other pApErs, IncLudinG pimeNtel [@piMentel], BoNichoN And Marckert [@bonIChonmarckert] oR noRRIs ANd TuRneR [@norristurnEr]. ThE Main DiffICuLty IN the cAse of ThE rSt, Is that the local rule uSeD for seLectiNg the ancestor Implies comPLEX dependeNces. tHe LAtter make it difFiculT to exhibit NAtural MaRkov pRocesses And prevenT A Direct usE of MarTinGalE COnVergence theorEMS or LYaPunov fuNctIons.

HowEveR, ouR stUdy CaN rely
in N$ and $X\not= O$ suchthat $$\la bel{d efR ST} 
| Y| <  |X|  \; \mbox{ and } \;  N \cap B(O,|X|) \capB(X,| X- Y |) = \e mptys et$$ (w h er e $B( c, r) $ d en o te s the  op en ball  with cent er$c $ and radius $r $). For an y $ X\in N\setmi nus \{O\}$ ,the r e isa.s . onl y one$ Y\in N $ satisfy in g  (\[de f RST\]). A mo ng t he vertices of $N \ ca p  B(O,|X|)$, th is isth e  c l o ses t t o $X$. Thi sverte x  is den o te d b y $ \ A(X)$ and cal led the *an c est or* of  $ X$. With a n abu se ofnotation, f or a n edge $e $, wec all anc e stor of  the e dge  th e en d po in t t ha t  is th e a n ces tor of t he  o therendp o i n t , wh ich  wecallthe descendan t o f th e  ed ge. T he an cest or  of $ e$ isthe e nd point of $e$ th at i s closerfro m$O$ .Withp robabi lit y $ 1$, the  graph$ \ma th c a l {T }$ admits a tree s tr u c tu re (ther e is n o  l oo p ) rooted  a t t he o r i gin $ O$.F or  conveni ence,w ese t $\A(O )= O$.

A  s equ enc e $(X _ {n}) _{n\ge q 0}$ of  vert i ces of $N$ isa  semi-infinit e  p a t ho f th e R ST $\mathca l{T} $  if,  for an y $ n $, $X _{n}$  i s  t h e ancestor of $X_{n +1 }$. Asemi- infinite path  $(X_{n})_ { n \ geq 0}$hasa sy m ptotic directi on $\ theta\in [ 0 ,2\pi)$if $$ \lim_{n\ to\infty} \ frac{X_{ n}} {|X _{n }|} =  e ^{\i\theta}$$ ( by i de ntifyin g $ \mathbb {R} ^{2 }$wit hthe compl ex plane  $ \m at hb b{C }$).\ Radial r an dom  t ree s int he pla ne ha ve b ee ns tud ied inm an y othe rpa pers , i nc ludin g Pi m ent el [@pi mentel],Bon i chon  a nd  Marcke rt [@bonichon ma rckert] or  N orr is and T urner [@ norristurner]. The main difficu lty  in t he c ase of th e R ST, is  th a t thelocalruleus edf o r sel e c ti ngth e ancestor i mpl ies c om plex  depend ences. The latterm ake  it difficult  to  exh i b it  na t ur a l M ar k ovp r ocesses and pre vent a dir ec t  u se of mart i nga le  conver gence t heore m s or Ly apunov fu nctions.
H owev e r , o ur study c an rely
in N$_and $X\not=_O$ such that $$\label{defRST}
|Y|_< |X|_\;_\mbox{ and_}_\; N \cap_B(O,|X|) \cap B(X,|X-Y|)_= \emptyset$$ (where $B(c,r)$_denotes the open_ball_with center $c$ and radius $r$). For any $X\in N\setminus\{O\}$, there is a.s. only_one_$Y\in N$_satisfying_(\[defRST\])._Among the vertices of $N\cap_B(O,|X|)$, this is the closest_to $X$._This vertex is denoted by $\A(X)$ and called_the_*ancestor* of $X$._With an abuse of notation, for an edge $e$,_we call ancestor of the edge_the endpoint that_is_the_ancestor of the other_endpoint, which we call the descendant_of the edge. The ancestor of_$e$ is the endpoint of $e$ that_is closer from $O$. With probability_$1$, the graph $\mathcal{T}$ admits_a tree_structure (there is no loop)_rooted at the_origin $O$._For convenience, we_set $\A(O)=O$.

A sequence $(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ of_vertices of $N$_is a semi-infinite path of the_RST_$\mathcal{T}$ if, for_any_$n$,_$X_{n}$ is_the ancestor of_$X_{n+1}$._A semi-infinite_path_$(X_{n})_{n\geq 0}$ has asymptotic direction $\theta\in_[0,2\pi)$_if $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{X_{n}}{|X_{n}|} = e^{\i\theta}$$ (by identifying_$\mathbb{R}^{2}$ with the complex_plane_$\mathbb{C}$).\
Radial random trees in_the plane have been studied_in many other papers, including Pimentel_[@pimentel], Bonichon_and Marckert_[@bonichonmarckert] or Norris and Turner [@norristurner]. The main difficulty in the_case of the RST, is that_the local rule used_for selecting_the_ancestor implies complex_dependences._The latter_make it difficult to exhibit natural Markov_processes and_prevent a direct use of martingale_convergence theorems or Lyapunov_functions.

However,_our study can rely