
    \label{eq:Tpweight+}
    {\hat{T}}_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lambda ))_{\alpha })
    \subset &M^\chi (\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })},\\
    \label{eq:Tpweight-}
    {\hat{T}}^-_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lambda ))_{\alpha })
    \subset &M^\chi (\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })}.
  \end{aligned}$$ In particular, $$\begin{aligned}
    \fch{M^\chi (\Lambda )} =
    {\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}
    (\fch{M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}_p^\chi (\Lambda ))}).
    \label{eq:fchM}
  \end{aligned}$$

Let $\Lambda '={t}^\chi _p(\Lambda )$ and $u\in U(r_p(\chi ))_{\alpha }$. Then $${\hat{T}}_p(uv_{\Lambda '})={T}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lambda
  \in U(\chi )_{{\sigma }_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })}U(\chi )_{(1-{b}){\alpha }_p}v_\Lambda$$ by Prop. \[pr:LTdeg\]. This proves Eq. , since $v_\Lambda \in M^\chi (\Lambda )_0$, The proof of Eq.  is similar. By Eq. , ${\mathrm{ch}\,M}^\chi (\Lambda )$ does not depend on $\Lambda $. Hence by Prop. \[pr:VTMiso\] we may assume that ${\hat{T}}_p$ is an isomorphism. Then Eq.  follows from Eq. .

\[le:chsub\] Let $\Lambda \in {{\mathrm{Hom}}({\mathcal{U}}^0,{{\mathbb{K}}^\times })}$ and $t\in \{1,2,\dots,{b}-1\}$. Assume that $\Lambda (K_pL_p^{-1})=\chi ({\alpha }_p,{\alpha }_p)^{t-1}$. Then
\label{eq: Tpweight+ } 
     { \hat{T}}_p(M^{r_p(\chi) } ({ t}^\chi _ p(\Lambda) ) _ { \alpha }) 
     \subset & M^\chi (\Lambda) _ { { \dot{\sigma } } _ p^{r_p(\chi) } ({ \alpha }) }, \\ 
     \label{eq: Tpweight- } 
     { \hat{T}}^-_p(M^{r_p(\chi) } ({ t}^\chi _ p(\Lambda) ) _ { \alpha }) 
     \subset & M^\chi (\Lambda) _ { { \dot{\sigma } } _ p^{r_p(\chi) } ({ \alpha }) }. 
   \end{aligned}$$ In particular, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \fch{M^\chi (\Lambda) } = 
     { \dot{\sigma } } _ p^{r_p(\chi) } 
     (\fch{M^{r_p(\chi) } ({ t}_p^\chi (\Lambda) ) }). 
     \label{eq: fchM } 
   \end{aligned}$$ 

 Let $ \Lambda' = { t}^\chi _ p(\Lambda) $ and $ u\in U(r_p(\chi) ) _ { \alpha } $. Then $ $ { \hat{T}}_p(uv_{\Lambda' }) = { T}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lambda 
   \in U(\chi) _ { { \sigma } _ p^{r_p(\chi) } ({ \alpha }) } U(\chi) _ { (1-{b}){\alpha } _ p}v_\Lambda$$ by Prop.   \[pr: LTdeg\ ]. This proves Eq.  , since $ v_\Lambda \in M^\chi (\Lambda) _ 0 $, The proof of Eq.    is exchangeable. By Eq.  , $ { \mathrm{ch}\,M}^\chi (\Lambda) $ does not count on $ \Lambda $. Hence by Prop.   \[pr: VTMiso\ ] we may assume that $ { \hat{T}}_p$ is an isomorphism. Then Eq.    follow from Eq.  . 

 \[le: chsub\ ] get $ \Lambda \in { { \mathrm{Hom}}({\mathcal{U}}^0,{{\mathbb{K}}^\times }) } $ and $ t\in \{1,2,\dots,{b}-1\}$. Assume that $ \Lambda (K_pL_p^{-1})=\chi ({ \alpha } _ p,{\alpha } _ p)^{t-1}$. Then

    \label{eq:Tpweight+}
    {\hat{T}}_k(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lamyea ))_{\alpia })
    \aubset &M^\zhi (\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\appya })},\\
    \label{eq:Tpweight-}
    {\hxt{T}}^-_p(M^{r_p(\chp )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lqmbde ))_{\alpha })
    \subsxf &M^\chi (\Lambda )_{{\fot{\sngna }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alphs })}.
  \end{alicned}$$ In particglxr, $$\begin{aligned}
    \fch{M^\chi (\Lambda )} =
    {\dot{\sibmw }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}
    (\fsh{M^{r_k(\chy )}({t}_p^\dhi (\Lambda ))}).
    \label{eq:fchM}
  \end{alifned}$$

Let $\Lambda '={t}^\chi _l(\Lambda )$ and $u\in U(r_p(\chi ))_{\aloha }$. Then $${\hat{T}}_p(uv_{\Lambdw '})={T}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lanbda
  \in U(\chi )_{{\sigoa }_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })}U(\chi )_{(1-{b}){\zlpha }_p}v_\Lambda$$ by Prop. \[pr:LTdeg\]. Tfis pxoves Eq. , sibcw $v_\Pdmbda \in M^\cii (\Lamfda )_0$, The proof of Eq.  is simolar. By Eq. , ${\matmrm{ch}\,K}^\chu (\Lambda )$ does not de'end on $\Lambda $. Hencg by Prop. \[ps:VCMiso\] we may assume tyar ${\hat{J}}_p$ is an kwomurpgixm. Then Fq.  hollows froj Eq. .

\[le:chsub\] Let $\Lambda \in {{\mathtm{Rim}}({\mathcal{U}}^0,{{\matgbb{K}}^\tiief })}$ and $t\in \{1,2,\dots,{b}-1\}$. Assume that $\Lambda (K_pL_k^{-1})=\chi ({\zlpha }_p,{\alpha }_p)^{t-1}$. Then
\label{eq:Tpweight+} {\hat{T}}_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lambda ))_{\alpha }) \subset )_{{\dot{\sigma )}({\alpha })},\\ {\hat{T}}^-_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma )}({\alpha })}. \end{aligned}$$ particular, $$\begin{aligned} \fch{M^\chi )} = {\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )} (\fch{M^{r_p(\chi (\Lambda ))}). \label{eq:fchM} \end{aligned}$$ Let $\Lambda '={t}^\chi _p(\Lambda )$ and $u\in U(r_p(\chi ))_{\alpha Then $${\hat{T}}_p(uv_{\Lambda '})={T}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lambda \in U(\chi )_{{\sigma }_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })}U(\chi )_{(1-{b}){\alpha }_p}v_\Lambda$$ by Prop. This Eq. since \in M^\chi (\Lambda )_0$, The proof of Eq. is similar. By Eq. , ${\mathrm{ch}\,M}^\chi (\Lambda )$ not depend on $\Lambda $. Hence by Prop. we may assume that is an isomorphism. Then Eq. from . \[le:chsub\] $\Lambda {{\mathrm{Hom}}({\mathcal{U}}^0,{{\mathbb{K}}^\times and $t\in \{1,2,\dots,{b}-1\}$. that $\Lambda (K_pL_p^{-1})=\chi ({\alpha }_p,{\alpha }_p)^{t-1}$. Then

    \label{eq:Tpweight+}
    {\hat{T}}_p(M^{r_p(\chI )}({t}^\chi _p(\LambDa ))_{\alpHa })
    \sUbsEt &m^\chi (\lambDa )_{{\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\cHI )}({\alpHa })},\\
    \label{eq:Tpweight-}
    {\hat{T}}^-_p(m^{r_p(\chI )}({t}^\CHi _p(\LAMbDa ))_{\alpHa })
    \subseT &m^\cHI (\lamBdA )_{{\dOt{\sIgMA }}_p^{R_p(\chi )}({\AlpHa })}.
  \end{alIgned}$$ In parTicUlAr, $$\begin{alignED}
    \fCh{M^\chi (\LambDa )} =
    {\dOt{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chI )}
    (\fcH{M^{r_p(\chI )}({t}_P^\chI (\lambdA ))}).
    \laBel{eq:FchM}
  \enD{AligneD}$$

Let $\LambdA '={t}^\CHi _p(\LamBDa )$ and $u\iN u(R_p(\Chi ))_{\aLpha }$. Then $${\hat{T}}_p(uv_{\LaMBdA '})={t}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lambda
  \iN U(\chi )_{{\sIgMA }_p^{R_P(\Chi )}({\AlpHa })}U(\chi )_{(1-{b}){\alpHa }_P}v_\LamBDa$$ by ProP. \[Pr:ltDEg\]. THIs proves Eq. , sinCe $v_\Lambda \in m^\Chi (\lambda )_0$, thE prOOf of Eq.  Is simIlAR. By eq. , ${\mathrm{ch}\,M}^\Chi (\LAmbda )$ does Not depENd on $\LamBDa $. Hence By Prop. \[Pr:VtMiSo\] we MAy AsSumE tHAt ${\hAT{T}}_P$ is AN isOmorphisM. THeN Eq.  foLlowS FROM Eq. .

\[lE:chSub\] LEt $\LamBda \in {{\mathrm{HoM}}({\maThcaL{u}}^0,{{\maThbb{K}}^\Times })}$ And $t\In \{1,2,\Dots,{b}-1\}$. assume That $\LAmBda (K_pL_p^{-1})=\chi ({\alpha }_P,{\alpHa }_p)^{t-1}$. Then

    \label{eq:Tpweight+}    {\hat{ T}}_p (M^ {r_ p( \chi  )}( {t}^\chi _p(\L a mbda  ))_{\alpha })
    \su bset&M ^ \chi (\ Lambd a )_{{\ d ot { \ sig ma  } }_p ^{ r _p (\chi  )} ({\alph a })},\\
  \l abel{eq:Tpwe i gh t-}
    {\ hat {T}}^-_p(M^{ r_p (\chi)} ({t } ^\chi  _p (\Lam bda )) _ {\alph a })
   \s u bset & M ^\chi ( \ L am bda)_{{\dot{\sigma } } _p ^ {r_p(\chi )}({ \alpha  } ) }.  \e nd{ aligned}$$  I n par t icular, $$ \ b e gin { aligned}
   \fch{M^\chi (\L ambda)}  =   {\d ot{\s ig m a } }_p^{r_p(\c hi ) }
    (\f ch{M^{ r _p(\chi )}({t}_ p^\chi  (\ Lam bda) )} ). 
  \ lab e l{ eq: f chM }
  \end {a li gned} $$
L e t $\La mbd a '= {t}^\ chi _p(\Lambd a ) $ an d  $u \in U (r_p( \chi  ) )_{\a lpha } $. Th en  $${\hat{T}}_p( uv_{ \Lambda ' })= {T }_p (u )F_p^ { {b}-1} v_\ Lam bda
  \ in U(\c h i ) _{ { \ s ig ma }_p^{r_p(\chi ) }( { \ al pha })}U (\chi) _{ (1 - {b}){\al ph a } _p}v _ \ Lambd a$$b yProp. \[ pr:LTd e g\ ].  This p ro ves Eq ., s inc e $v_ \ Lamb da \in  M^\chi(\Lam b da )_0$, The p r oof of Eq.  i s  s i m il a r. B y E q. , ${\mat hrm{ c h}\, M}^\ c hi  (\ L ambda  )$ d oe s  n o t depend on $\Lambd a$. Hen ce by  Prop. \[pr:V TMiso\] we m a y assume  tha t  $ { \hat{T}}_p$ is  an i somorphism .  Then Eq .  fo llows fr om Eq. .\ [le:chsu b\]  Le t $ \La m b da  \in {{\mathr m { Hom} }( {\mathc al{ U}}^0,{ {\m ath bb{ K}} ^\ times })} $ and $t \i n\{ 1, 2,\ dots, { b}-1\}$.  A ssu me  th at $\ L ambda(K_pL _p^{ -1 }) = \ch i ({\al p ha } _p,{ \a lp ha } _p) ^{ t-1}$ . Th e n

 _ _\label{eq:Tpweight+}
   _{\hat{T}}_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi__p(\Lambda_))_{\alpha })
__  \subset_&M^\chi (\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma_}}_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })},\\
 _  \label{eq:Tpweight-}
__  {\hat{T}}^-_p(M^{r_p(\chi )}({t}^\chi _p(\Lambda ))_{\alpha })
    \subset &M^\chi (\Lambda )_{{\dot{\sigma_}}_p^{r_p(\chi_)}({\alpha })}.
__\end{aligned}$$_In particular, $$\begin{aligned}
  _ \fch{M^\chi (\Lambda )} =
_ _ {\dot{\sigma }}_p^{r_p(\chi )}
    (\fch{M^{r_p(\chi_)}({t}_p^\chi_(\Lambda ))}).
 _  \label{eq:fchM}
  \end{aligned}$$

Let $\Lambda '={t}^\chi _p(\Lambda )$_and $u\in U(r_p(\chi ))_{\alpha }$. Then_$${\hat{T}}_p(uv_{\Lambda '})={T}_p(u)F_p^{{b}-1}v_\Lambda
 _\in_U(\chi_)_{{\sigma }_p^{r_p(\chi )}({\alpha })}U(\chi_)_{(1-{b}){\alpha }_p}v_\Lambda$$ by Prop. \[pr:LTdeg\]. This proves_Eq. , since $v_\Lambda \in M^\chi (\Lambda_)_0$, The proof of Eq.  is similar._By Eq. , ${\mathrm{ch}\,M}^\chi (\Lambda )$ does_not depend on $\Lambda $._Hence by_Prop. \[pr:VTMiso\] we may assume that_${\hat{T}}_p$ is an_isomorphism. Then_Eq.  follows from_Eq. .

\[le:chsub\] Let $\Lambda \in {{\mathrm{Hom}}({\mathcal{U}}^0,{{\mathbb{K}}^\times })}$_and $t\in \{1,2,\dots,{b}-1\}$._Assume that $\Lambda (K_pL_p^{-1})=\chi ({\alpha }_p,{\alpha_}_p)^{t-1}$._Then