
\lim_{B \to \infty}  \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{NA}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]}{\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\delta}} 
\geq 
\frac{(1-\epsilon) \sigma^2 \delta }{\log e},\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:B_A}
\lim_{B \to \infty} \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{A}} \expe_{\mathfrak{c}^{\prime}_{\epsilon}}[\tau^{\prime}]}{\frac{B}{\delta} } 
= 0.\end{aligned}$$

The proof of the above corollary is provided in Appendix-C.

The above corollary characterizes the two qualitatively different regimes previously discussed. For fixed $B$, as $\delta$ goes to zero the asymptotic adaptivity gain scales as only $\log \frac{B}{\delta}$, whereas for fixed $\delta$, as $B$ increases the asymptotic adaptivity gain scales as $\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\delta}$. In other words, target acquisition rate improves by a constant for fixed $B$ as $\delta$ decreases while it grows linearly with $B$ for a fixed $\delta$. In other words, adaptivity provides a larger gain in target acquisition rate for the regime where the total search width is growing than in the case where we fix the total width and shrink the location widths. In Section \[sec:num\_results\] we related this phenomenon to the diminishing capacity of BAWGN channel when the total noise $\frac{B\sigma^2}{2}$ grows.

Next we provide the main technical components of the proof of Theorem \[thm:gain\_lower\_bound\].

Converse: Non-Adaptive Search Strategies
----------------------------------------

\[lemma:converse\_k\_1\]

The minimum expected number of measurements required for any $\epsilon$-reliable non-adaptive search strategy can be lower bounded as $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}^{NA}_{\epsilon}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau] \geq \frac{(1-\epsilon) \log \left(\frac{B}{\delta}\
\lim_{B \to \infty }   \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon } \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{NA}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]}{\frac{B}{\delta } \log \frac{B}{\delta } } 
 \geq 
 \frac{(1-\epsilon) \sigma^2 \delta } { \log e},\end{aligned}$$ and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: B_A } 
 \lim_{B \to \infty } \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon } \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{A } } \expe_{\mathfrak{c}^{\prime}_{\epsilon}}[\tau^{\prime}]}{\frac{B}{\delta } } 
 = 0.\end{aligned}$$ 

 The proof of the above corollary is provided in   Appendix - C. 

 The above corollary characterizes the two qualitatively different government previously discourse. For fixed $ B$, as $ \delta$ goes to zero the asymptotic adaptivity gain scale as only $ \log \frac{B}{\delta}$, whereas for fixed $ \delta$, as $ B$ increase the asymptotic adaptivity profit scales as $ \frac{B}{\delta } \log \frac{B}{\delta}$. In other words, target skill rate improves by a constant for specify $ B$ as $ \delta$ decreases while it grows linearly with $ B$ for a fixed $ \delta$. In other words, adaptivity provides a bigger gain in target acquisition pace for the regime where the total search width is grow than in the sheath where we fix the full width and shrink the location widths. In Section   \[sec: num\_results\ ] we refer this phenomenon to the diminishing capacity of BAWGN channel when the total noise $ \frac{B\sigma^2}{2}$ grows. 

 Next we leave the main technical components of the proof of Theorem   \[thm: gain\_lower\_bound\ ]. 

 Converse: Non - Adaptive Search Strategies 
 ---------------------------------------- 

 \[lemma: converse\_k\_1\ ] 

 The minimum expected number of measurements required for any $ \epsilon$-reliable non - adaptive search strategy can be lower jump as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon } \in \mathcal{C}^{NA}_{\epsilon}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau ] \geq \frac{(1-\epsilon) \log \left(\frac{B}{\delta}\

\lim_{H \to \infty}  \frac{\min_{\mathfvak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mcrhcal{C}_{\xpsilon}^{HA}}\expe_{\maghfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]}{\frac{B}{\delta} \pot \frax{B}{\delta}} 
\geq 
\frac{(1-\epsilov) \sigma^2 \dvlta }{\log w},\end{eligned}$$ and $$\begii{zligned}
\label{es:N_A}
\lim_{Y \vo \infty} \frac{\mik_{\mathfrak{c}_{\e[silon} \in \mathwau{C}_{\zpsilon}^{A}} \expe_{\mathfrak{c}^{\prime}_{\epsilon}}[\tat^{\prime}]}{\ftaf{B}{\delta} } 
= 0.\end{ajigntd}$$

Tre pdoof of the above corollary is probided ii Appendix-C.

The anove corollary characterizfs tje two qualitativepy differenj redumes previourly discussed. For fixes $B$, as $\delta$ goes to zero the arymptptic adaptuvuty cain scales as ogly $\log \frac{N}{\celta}$, fhereas for fixed $\delba$, as $B$ uncreases the asymptovic adaptivity gain fcales as $\fxac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\deotq}$. In mthes wofes, garfev adquisihioi rate imprkves by a cinstant for fixed $B$ af $\delta$ decreaaes whylq it grows linearly with $B$ for a fixed $\gelfa$. In other words, adaptuvity provides a larggr gain in target acquisition rate for the regime where the totam secvgh wketj is growing than in the case where we fix thq tptsl width and smrink the location wldyrs. In Section \[rec:num\_xsshlts\] we related thls phenjmenob to the qimimishing capacity of BAWGN cyannel when nhe rotal noise $\frac{B\sngma^2}{2}$ grows.

Nert we krovidr the main technical cooponsnts of the proof of Gheorem \[thm:gain\_loder\_noutd\].

Converse: Non-Adaptive Seawch Stratxgies
----------------------------------------

\[kemma:covverxe\_k\_1\]

The minimum edpectcg number of measurfmentd sequired flr any $\epsilon$-reliable non-adaptmte search strstagy can be jower bounded as $$\bqgin{aligned}
\min_{\kathfrah{c}_{\epsklon} \in \manhcal{C}^{NA}_{\e'silon}}\expe_{\maehfrak{c}_{\epsilot}}[\jau] \geq \frac{(1-\e'silon) \lod \ledt(\frqc{B}{\deltx}\
\lim_{B \to \infty} \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{NA}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]}{\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{(1-\epsilon) \delta }{\log and $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:B_A} \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{A}} } = 0.\end{aligned}$$ proof of the corollary is provided in Appendix-C. The corollary characterizes the two qualitatively different regimes previously discussed. For fixed $B$, as goes to zero the asymptotic adaptivity gain scales as only $\log \frac{B}{\delta}$, whereas fixed as increases asymptotic adaptivity gain scales as $\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\delta}$. In other words, target acquisition rate improves by constant for fixed $B$ as $\delta$ decreases while grows linearly with $B$ a fixed $\delta$. In other adaptivity a larger in acquisition for the regime the total search width is growing than in the case where we fix the total width and the location Section \[sec:num\_results\] related phenomenon the diminishing capacity channel when the total noise $\frac{B\sigma^2}{2}$ provide the main technical components of the proof Theorem \[thm:gain\_lower\_bound\]. Non-Adaptive Search Strategies ---------------------------------------- \[lemma:converse\_k\_1\] The expected number of measurements required for any $\epsilon$-reliable search strategy can be lower bounded as $$\begin{aligned} \min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}^{NA}_{\epsilon}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau] \geq \frac{(1-\epsilon) \log \left(\frac{B}{\delta}\

\lim_{B \to \infty}  \frac{\min_{\mathfraK{c}_{\epsilon} \iN \mathCal{c}_{\epSiLon}^{Na}}\expE_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsiLOn}}[\taU]}{\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\delTa}} 
\geq 
\FrAC{(1-\epsILoN) \sigmA^2 \delta }{\lOG e},\END{alIgNeD}$$ anD $$\bEGiN{aligNed}
\Label{eq:b_A}
\lim_{B \to \inFty} \FrAc{\min_{\mathfraK{C}_{\ePsilon} \in \maThcAl{C}_{\epsilon}^{A}} \eXpe_{\MathfrAk{C}^{\prIMe}_{\epsIloN}}[\tau^{\pRime}]}{\frAC{B}{\deltA} } 
= 0.\end{alignEd}$$

tHe prooF Of the abOVE cOrolLary is provided in APPeNDix-C.

The above coRollarY cHArACTerIzeS the two quaLiTativELy diffeREnT REGimES previously diScussed. For fIXed $b$, as $\delTa$ GoeS To zero The asYmPTotIc adaptivitY gaiN scales as Only $\loG \Frac{B}{\deLTa}$, whereAs for fIxeD $\deLta$, aS $b$ iNcReaSeS The ASyMptOTic AdaptiviTy GaIn scaLes aS $\FRAC{B}{\deLta} \Log \fRac{B}{\dElta}$. In other woRds, TargET acQuisiTion rAte iMpRoves By a conStant FoR fixed $B$ as $\delta$ dEcreAses while It gRoWs lInEarly WIth $B$ foR a fIxeD $\delta$. IN other wORds, AdAPTIvIty provides a larger GaIN In Target acQuisitIOn RaTE for the rEgIme WherE THe totAl seARcH width is GrowinG ThAn In the caSe Where wE fIx tHe tOtal wIDth aNd shriNk the locAtion WIdths. In Section \[SEc:num\_results\] wE ReLATeD This PheNomenon to thE dimINishIng cAPaCitY Of BAWgN chaNnEL wHEn the total noise $\frac{b\sIgma^2}{2}$ grOws.

NeXt we provide thE main technICAL componeNts oF ThE Proof of Theorem \[Thm:gaIn\_lower\_bouND\].

ConversE: Non-ADaptive SEarch StraTEGies
----------------------------------------

\[lemmA:coNveRse\_K\_1\]

ThE MInImum expected nUMBer oF mEasuremEntS requirEd fOr aNy $\ePsiLoN$-reliable Non-adaptIvE sEaRcH stRategY Can be lowEr BouNdEd aS $$\begiN{AligneD}
\min_{\mAthfRaK{c}_{\EPsiLon} \in \maTHcAL{c}^{NA}_{\ePsIlOn}}\exPe_{\mAtHfrak{C}_{\epsILon}}[\Tau] \geq \fRac{(1-\epsiloN) \loG \Left(\FrAc{b}{\delta}\

\lim_{B \to \infty}  \fra c{\min_{\m athfr ak{ c}_ {\ epsi lon}  \in \mathcal{ C }_{\ epsilon}^{NA}}\expe_{\ mathf ra k {c}_ { \e psilo n}}[\ta u ]} { \ fra c{ B} {\d el t a}  \log  \f rac{B}{ \delta}} \ge q
\frac{(1-\e p si lon) \sigm a^2  \delta }{\l oge},\en d{ ali g ned}$ $ a nd $$ \begin { aligne d}
\label {e q :B_A}\ lim_{B\ t o\inf ty} \frac{\min_{\ m at h frak{c}_{\epsi lon} \ in \m a t hca l{C }_{\epsilo n} ^{A}} \expe_{ \ ma t h f rak { c}^{\prime}_{ \epsilon}}[ \ tau ^{\pri me }]} { \frac{ B}{\d el t a}} 
= 0.\end {ali gned}$$
The pr o of of t h e above  corol lar y i s pr o vi de d i nA ppe n di x-C . 

T he above  c or ollar y ch a r a c teri zes  the  twoqualitatively  di ffer e ntregim es pr evio us ly di scusse d. Fo rfixed $B$, as $ \del ta$ goestoze roth e asy m ptotic  ad apt ivity g ain sca l esas o n ly  $\log \frac{B}{\d el t a }$ , wherea s forf ix ed $\delta$ ,as$B$i n creas es t h easymptot ic ada p ti vi ty gain  s calesas  $\ fra c{B}{ \ delt a} \lo g \frac{ B}{\d e lta}$. In othe r  words, targe t  a c q ui s itio n r ate improve s by a co nsta n tfor fixed  $B$as $\ d elta$ decreases whi le  it gr ows l inearly with$B$ for af i x ed $\del ta$. In other words, a dapti vity provi d es a lar ger g ain in t arget acq u i sition r ate  fo r t her e gi me where thet o talse arch wi dth  is gro win g t han  in  t he case w here wefi xth etot al wi d th and s hr ink  t helocat i on wid ths.In S ec ti o n \ [sec:nu m \_ r e sult s\ ]we r ela te d thi s ph e nom enon to  the dimi nis h ingca pa city of  BAWGN channe lwhen the t ot alnoise$ \ frac{B\s igma^2}{2}$ grows.

Nex t  we pro vid e the  mai n technic alcompon ent s  of th e proo f ofTh eor e m  \[th m : ga in\ _l ower\_boun d \ ].
Conv er se:Non-Ada ptive Search Strat e gie s
----------- --- ---- - - -- --- - -- - --- -- - --- - - 

\[lemma:conve rse\_k\_1\ ]Th e minimume xpe ct ed numb er of m easur e ments r equired f or any $\ ep silo n $ -re liable non -adaptiv e searchs trate g ycan b e l ower b ou nde d as$$\beg i n{a ligne d}
\mi n_ {\math frak{ c} _{\epsil on} \in \mathcal{C}^{NA }_{\ep silon }}\ expe_{\ma thf r ak{ c}_{\epsi lon} }[\tau] \g eq\fr ac{(1 -\e p silon ) \l o g\le f t(\fr ac{B } {\delta}\ 

\lim_{B \to_\infty} _\frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{NA}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]}{\frac{B}{\delta} \log_\frac{B}{\delta}} 
\geq_
\frac{(1-\epsilon)_\sigma^2 \delta_}{\log_e},\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:B_A}
\lim_{B_\to \infty} \frac{\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}_\in \mathcal{C}_{\epsilon}^{A}} \expe_{\mathfrak{c}^{\prime}_{\epsilon}}[\tau^{\prime}]}{\frac{B}{\delta} }_
= 0.\end{aligned}$$

The proof_of_the above corollary is provided in Appendix-C.

The above corollary characterizes the two qualitatively different regimes_previously_discussed. For_fixed_$B$,_as $\delta$ goes to zero_the asymptotic adaptivity gain scales_as only_$\log \frac{B}{\delta}$, whereas for fixed $\delta$, as $B$_increases_the asymptotic adaptivity_gain scales as $\frac{B}{\delta} \log \frac{B}{\delta}$. In other words,_target acquisition rate improves by a_constant for fixed_$B$_as_$\delta$ decreases while it_grows linearly with $B$ for a_fixed $\delta$. In other words, adaptivity_provides a larger gain in target acquisition_rate for the regime where the_total search width is growing_than in_the case where we fix_the total width_and shrink_the location widths._In Section \[sec:num\_results\] we related this phenomenon_to the diminishing_capacity of BAWGN channel when the_total_noise $\frac{B\sigma^2}{2}$ grows.

Next_we_provide_the main_technical components of_the_proof of_Theorem \[thm:gain\_lower\_bound\].

Converse:_Non-Adaptive Search Strategies
----------------------------------------

\[lemma:converse\_k\_1\]

The minimum expected number_of_measurements required for any $\epsilon$-reliable non-adaptive search_strategy can be lower_bounded_as $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon} \in \mathcal{C}^{NA}_{\epsilon}}\expe_{\mathfrak{c}_{\epsilon}}[\tau]_\geq \frac{(1-\epsilon) \log \left(\frac{B}{\delta}\