 the time dependence is beyond the calculation presented in this paper, we can provide the first perturbative QCD-correction to the spatial derivatives. The leading coefficient is the classical contribution to the derivative term, and comes from the kinetic term of $A_0 (\vec{x})$ in Eq. (\[knownaction\]), as can be seen from the following argument [@robprivate]: decomposing the Wilson Line in Eq. (\[wilsonline\]) into an octet $\tilde{{\bf L}}$ and the singlet $l$, $$\begin{aligned}
{\bf L} = \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, {\bf L} = \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}l \,\end{aligned}$$ where $\tilde{{\bf L}}$ is traceless and $N=3$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
{\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf L}|^2 = {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \. \label{decomposeL}\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, by a direct calculation in the static limit, $$\begin{aligned}
{\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf L}|^2 = g^2\beta^2 ({\partial}_iA_0^a)^2 + {\rm Tr}\, \left \{ {\rm commutator \, terms} 
\right \} \. \label{commutators}\end{aligned}$$ When the commutator terms in Eq. (\[commutators\]) are rewritten in terms of ${\bf L}$ they can only involve the adjoint field, or products of $l$ and $\tilde{{\bf L}}$, since $l$ (times the identity matrix) by itself commutes with all SU(3) matrices. Thus, by combining Eqs. (\[decomposeL\]) and (\[commutators\]), we have, $$\begin{aligned}
(1/2)({\partial}_iA_0)^2 = \frac{T^2}{2g^2}\left [ {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \right ] +
f(\tilde{{\bf L}}) \, \label{leadingderivative}\end{aligned}$$ where $f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ corresponds to the commutator terms, rewritten as
the time dependence is beyond the calculation presented in this paper, we can leave the inaugural perturbative QCD - correction to the spatial derivatives. The leave coefficient is the classical contribution to the derivative term, and come from the kinetic term of $ A_0 (\vec{x})$ in Eq.   (\[knownaction\ ]), as can be see from the following argument [ @robprivate ]: decompose the Wilson Line in Eq.   (\[wilsonline\ ]) into an octet $ \tilde{{\bf L}}$ and the singlet $ l$, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \bf L } = \tilde{{\bf L } } + { \bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, { \bf L } = \tilde{{\bf lambert } } + { \bf 1}l \,\end{aligned}$$ where $ \tilde{{\bf L}}$ is traceless and $ N=3 $, we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \rm Tr}|{\partial}_i { \bf L}|^2 = { \rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \. \label{decomposeL}\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, by a direct calculation in the static limit, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \rm Tr}|{\partial}_i { \bf L}|^2 = g^2\beta^2 ({ \partial}_iA_0^a)^2 + { \rm Tr}\, \left \ { { \rm commutator \, terminus } 
 \right \ } \. \label{commutators}\end{aligned}$$ When the commutator terms in Eq.   (\[commutators\ ]) are rewritten in terms of $ { \bf L}$ they can entirely involve the adjoint field, or products of $ l$ and $ \tilde{{\bf L}}$, since $ l$ (times the identity matrix) by itself commutes with all SU(3) matrix. Thus, by combining Eqs.   (\[decomposeL\ ]) and (\[commutators\ ]), we have, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 (1/2)({\partial}_iA_0)^2 = \frac{T^2}{2g^2}\left [ { \rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \right ] + 
 f(\tilde{{\bf L } }) \, \label{leadingderivative}\end{aligned}$$ where $ f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ corresponds to the commutator terms, rewritten as
 thf time dependence is beyund the calculajiin prevented in this paper, we can provide the ficst pertuebative QCD-correction go the spwtial deeivauives. The leading coefficlznt ia the rlassical contrlbution to dhe derivative tdrl, and comes from the kinetic term os $A_0 (\vec{c})$ ln Eq. (\[knownactijn\]), ax can be seen from the following argumeht [@robpgivate]: decomposinb the Wilson Line in Eq. (\[wildonllne\]) into an octet $\hilde{{\bf L}}$ abd trw singlet $l$, $$\cegin{aligntd}
{\yf L} = \tilde{{\gf L}} + {\bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, {\bf L} = \tilde{{\cf L}} + {\bf 1}l \,\end{aoitnef}$$ where $\tildx{{\bf L}}$ ps traceless and $N=3$, we have $$\brgin{aligned}
{\rm Br}|{\parvial}_u {\bf L}|^2 = {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partiaj}_i l|^2 \. \labal{becomposeL}\end{aligned}$$ In the mthes have, bh a dmredt calfuletion in ths static linit, $$\begin{aligned}
{\rm Ur}|{\pwgyial}_i {\bf L}|^2 = f^2\beta^2 ({\[awtial}_iA_0^a)^2 + {\rm Tr}\, \left \{ {\rm commutator \, tegms} 
\dight \} \. \label{commutatorw}\end{aligned}$$ When the fommutatow terms in Eq. (\[commutators\]) are rewritten in terms ox ${\bf M}$ thty can ublj involve the adjoint field, or products of $l$ whd $\tplde{{\bf L}}$, since $l$ (bimes the identity mwttyx) by itself zommutza sith all SU(3) matricfs. Thus, by cimbining Tqs. (\[devomposeL\]) and (\[commutators\]), we have, $$\begin{ajugned}
(1/2)({\partial}_iA_0)^2 = \frcc{T^2}{2g^2}\left [ {\rm Tr}|{\psrtiak}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i u|^2 \rifht ] +
f(\tilde{{\hf L}}) \, \labsu{leadingderivatixe}\ekd{anigned}$$ where $f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ cowresponds to che commjtatpr teris, rewrittfn as
the time dependence is beyond the calculation this we can the first perturbative The coefficient is the contribution to the term, and comes from the kinetic of $A_0 (\vec{x})$ in Eq. (\[knownaction\]), as can be seen from the following [@robprivate]: decomposing the Wilson Line in Eq. (\[wilsonline\]) into an octet $\tilde{{\bf L}}$ the $l$, {\bf = \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, {\bf L} = \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}l \,\end{aligned}$$ $\tilde{{\bf L}}$ is traceless and $N=3$, we have {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf L}|^2 {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + l|^2 \label{decomposeL}\end{aligned}$$ On other by direct calculation in static limit, $$\begin{aligned} {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf L}|^2 = g^2\beta^2 ({\partial}_iA_0^a)^2 + {\rm Tr}\, \left \{ {\rm commutator terms} \right \label{commutators}\end{aligned}$$ When commutator in (\[commutators\]) are rewritten of ${\bf L}$ they can only field, or products of $l$ and $\tilde{{\bf L}}$, $l$ (times identity matrix) by itself commutes with SU(3) matrices. Thus, by combining Eqs. (\[decomposeL\]) and we have, $$\begin{aligned} (1/2)({\partial}_iA_0)^2 = \frac{T^2}{2g^2}\left [ {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \right f(\tilde{{\bf L}}) \, \label{leadingderivative}\end{aligned}$$ $f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ corresponds the terms, as
 the time dependence is beyond The calculaTion pResEntEd In thIs paPer, we can providE The fIrst perturbative QCD-corRectiOn TO the SPaTial dErivatiVEs. tHE leAdInG coEfFIcIent iS thE classiCal contribUtiOn To the derivatIVe Term, and comEs fRom the kinetiC teRm of $A_0 (\vEc{X})$ in eQ. (\[knowNacTion\]), aS can be SEen froM the folloWiNG argumENt [@robprIVAtE]: decOmposing the Wilson lInE In Eq. (\[wilsonline\]) Into an OcTEt $\TILde{{\Bf L}}$ And the singLeT $l$, $$\begIN{aligneD}
{\Bf l} = \TILde{{\BF L}} + {\bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, {\Bf L} = \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\BF 1}l \,\eNd{aligNeD}$$ whERe $\tildE{{\bf L}}$ iS tRAceLess and $N=3$, we hAve $$\bEgin{alignEd}
{\rm Tr}|{\PArtial}_i {\BF L}|^2 = {\rm Tr}|{\pArtial}_I \tiLde{{\Bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\pARtIaL}_i l|^2 \. \LaBEl{dECoMpoSEL}\eNd{aligneD}$$ ON tHe othEr haND, BY A dirEct CalcUlatiOn in the static LimIt, $$\beGIn{aLigneD}
{\rm Tr}|{\PartIaL}_i {\bf L}|^2 = G^2\beta^2 ({\pArtiaL}_ia_0^a)^2 + {\rm Tr}\, \left \{ {\rm comMutaTor \, terms} 
\rIghT \} \. \lAbeL{cOmmutATors}\enD{alIgnEd}$$ When tHe commuTAtoR tERMS iN Eq. (\[commutators\]) are rEwRITtEn in termS of ${\bf L}$ THeY cAN only invOlVe tHe adJOInt fiEld, oR PrOducts of $L$ and $\tiLDe{{\Bf l}}$, since $l$ (TiMes the IdEntIty MatriX) By itSelf coMmutes wiTh all su(3) matrices. Thus, bY Combining Eqs. (\[dECoMPOsEl\]) and (\[ComMutators\]), we hAve, $$\bEGin{aLignED}
(1/2)({\pArtIAl}_iA_0)^2 = \fRac{T^2}{2g^2}\LeFT [ {\rM tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\pArTial}_i l|^2 \Right ] +
F(\tilde{{\bf L}}) \, \labeL{leadingdeRIVAtive}\end{AligNEd}$$ WHere $f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ cOrresPonds to the COmmutatoR termS, rewrittEn as
 the time dependence is be yond the c alcul ati onpr esen tedin this paper, we c an provide the first p ertur ba t iveQ CD -corr ectiont ot h e s pa ti alde r iv ative s.The lea ding coeff ici en t is the cla s si cal contri but ion to the d eri vative  t erm ,  andcom es fr om the kineti c term of  $ A _0 (\v e c{x})$i n  E q. ( \[knownaction\]), as can be seen fr om the  f o ll o w ing  ar gument [@r ob priva t e]: dec o mp o s i ngt he Wilson Lin e in Eq. (\ [ wil sonlin e\ ])i nto an  octe t$ \ti lde{{\bf L} }$ a nd the si nglet$ l$, $$\ b egin{al igned} 
{\ bfL} = \t il de{ {\ b f L } }+ { \ bf1}\frac{ 1} {N }{\rm  Tr} \ , { \bfL}= \t ilde{ {\bf L}} + {\ bf1}l\ ,\e nd{al igned }$$wh ere $ \tilde {{\bf  L }}$ is traceles s an d $N=3$,weha ve$$ \begi n {align ed} 
{\ rm Tr}| {\parti a l}_ i{ \ b fL}|^2 = {\rm Tr}|{ \p a r ti al}_i \t ilde{{ \ bf  L } }|^2 + 3 |{ \pa rtia l } _i l| ^2 \ .  \ label{de compos e L} \e nd{alig ne d}$$ O nthe  ot her h a nd,by a d irect ca lcula t ion in the sta t ic limit, $$\ b eg i n {a l igne d}{\rm Tr}|{\ part i al}_ i {\ b fL}| ^ 2 = g ^2\be ta ^ 2( {\partial}_iA_0^a)^ 2+ {\rm  Tr}\ , \left \{ {\ rm commuta t o r  \, term s} \ ri g ht \} \. \labe l{com mutators}\ e nd{align ed}$$  When th e commuta t o r termsinEq.  (\ [co m m ut ators\]) arer e writ te n in te rms  of ${\ bfL}$  th eyca n only in volve th ead jo in t f ield, or produ ct s o f$l$  and$ \tilde {{\bf  L}} $,  s i nce  $l$ (t i me s theid en tity  ma tr ix) b y it s elf  commut es with a llS U(3)  m at rices.Thus, by comb in ing Eqs. ( \[ dec ompose L \ ]) and ( \[commutators\]), we ha v e, $$\b egi n{ali gned }
(1/2)({ \pa rtial} _iA _ 0)^2 =  \frac {T^2} {2 g^2 } \ left[ {\ rmTr }|{\partia l } _i\tild e{ {\bf  L}}|^2  + 3|{\partial}_il |^2  \right ] +
f (\t ilde { { \b f L } }) \,\l a bel { l eadingderivativ e}\end{ali gn e d} $$ where $ f (\t il de{{\bf  L}})$corre s ponds t o the com mutator t er ms,r e wri tten as
 the_time dependence_is beyond the calculation_presented in_this_paper, we_can_provide the first_perturbative QCD-correction to_the spatial derivatives. The_leading coefficient is_the_classical contribution to the derivative term, and comes from the kinetic term of $A_0_(\vec{x})$_in Eq. (\[knownaction\]),_as_can_be seen from the following_argument [@robprivate]: decomposing the Wilson_Line in_Eq. (\[wilsonline\]) into an octet $\tilde{{\bf L}}$ and the_singlet_$l$, $$\begin{aligned}
{\bf L}_= \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}\frac{1}{N}{\rm Tr}\, {\bf L}_= \tilde{{\bf L}} + {\bf 1}l_\,\end{aligned}$$ where $\tilde{{\bf_L}}$_is_traceless and $N=3$, we_have $$\begin{aligned}
{\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf L}|^2 =_{\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2 + 3|{\partial}_i_l|^2 \. \label{decomposeL}\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand,_by a direct calculation in the_static limit, $$\begin{aligned}
{\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i {\bf_L}|^2 =_g^2\beta^2 ({\partial}_iA_0^a)^2 + {\rm Tr}\,_\left \{ {\rm_commutator \,_terms} 
\right \}_\. \label{commutators}\end{aligned}$$ When the commutator terms_in Eq. (\[commutators\]) are_rewritten in terms of ${\bf L}$_they_can only involve_the_adjoint_field, or_products of $l$_and_$\tilde{{\bf L}}$,_since_$l$ (times the identity matrix) by_itself_commutes with all SU(3) matrices. Thus, by_combining Eqs. (\[decomposeL\]) and (\[commutators\]),_we_have, $$\begin{aligned}
(1/2)({\partial}_iA_0)^2 = \frac{T^2}{2g^2}\left_[ {\rm Tr}|{\partial}_i \tilde{{\bf L}}|^2_+ 3|{\partial}_i l|^2 \right ] +
f(\tilde{{\bf_L}}) \,_\label{leadingderivative}\end{aligned}$$ where_$f(\tilde{{\bf L}})$ corresponds to the commutator terms, rewritten as