 (\[eq:19\]) gives the quantity needed to complete the equation set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]). In order to abbreviate this calculation, we introduce an effective centrifugal acceleration. In the above calculation, if we view the situation in a frame rotating with an angular velocity of $u_t$, around an axis perpendicular to both $\vec{u}$ and the line of centers, passing through the center of particle $0$, then particle $1$ has zero tangential velocity, and the effect of the tangential velocity can be represented by a centrifugal acceleration $a_1=u_t^2$. This substitution is justified by noticing that we can get exactly the same expressions as (\[eq:19\]) and (\[eq:20\]) by using this acceleration. We do not need really use such a rotating frame. We use $a_1$ as an effective centrifugal acceleration to replace the tangential component of the velocity with the same effects.

After these preparations, we are in a much clearer position. Particle $1$ and particle $2$ respectively have centrifugal accelerations $a_1$ and $a_2$, which are all in the radial directions. Equation (\[eq:apr\]) is again a good approximation. Particle $1$ is moving on a line, and so is particle $2$. We can further drop the vector notation. In the following, we use $u$ to denote the radial component of the velocity of particles $1$ and $2$ immediately before a collision, with its positive direction pointing towards the center of particle $0$. Consequently, $a_1=-u_{1t}^2$ and $a_2=-u_{2t}^2$.

The equation set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]) reduces to $$\begin{aligned}
u_{n+1}^s & = & -ru_n^c+a_{n+1}^st_n \nonumber \\
u_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frac{1+r}{2}\cos\theta\cdot u_n^c +a_{n+1}^ct_n \nonumber \\
d_n & = & u_{n+1}^c\cdot t_n-\frac{1}{2}a_{n+1}^ct_n^2 \nonumber \\
-d_{n+1} & = & -
(\[eq:19\ ]) gives the quantity needed to complete the equality rig (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\ ]). In order to abbreviate this calculation, we insert an effective centrifugal acceleration. In the above calculation, if we watch the situation in a frame rotate with an angular speed of $ u_t$, around an axis perpendicular to both $ \vec{u}$ and the line of centers, passing through the center of atom $ 0 $, then particle $ 1 $ has zero tangential velocity, and the effect of the digressive velocity can be represented by a centrifugal acceleration $ a_1 = u_t^2$. This substitution is apologize by noticing that we can get precisely the same expressions as (\[eq:19\ ]) and (\[eq:20\ ]) by using this acceleration. We do not need very use such a rotating frame. We use $ a_1 $ as an effective centrifugal acceleration to supplant the tangential component of the velocity with the same effects. 

 After these homework, we are in a much clearer position. Particle $ 1 $ and particle $ 2 $ respectively have centrifugal accelerations $ a_1 $ and $ a_2 $, which are all in the radial directions. Equation (\[eq: apr\ ]) is again a good approximation. Particle $ 1 $ is moving on a line, and so is particle $ 2$. We can further drop the vector note. In the pursuit, we use $ u$ to denote the radial component of the speed of particle $ 1 $ and $ 2 $ immediately before a collision, with its positive direction pointing towards the center of particle $ 0$. Consequently, $ a_1=-u_{1t}^2 $ and $ a_2=-u_{2t}^2$. 

 The equation set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\ ]) reduces to $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 u_{n+1}^s & = & -ru_n^c+a_{n+1}^st_n \nonumber \\ 
 u_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frac{1+r}{2}\cos\theta\cdot u_n^c + a_{n+1}^ct_n \nonumber \\ 
 d_n & = & u_{n+1}^c\cdot t_n-\frac{1}{2}a_{n+1}^ct_n^2 \nonumber \\ 
 -d_{n+1 } & = & -
 (\[eq:19\]) gives the quantity needtd to complete thg wquatimn set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]). Iv order to abbreviate this celcuoatiob, we introduce an effeztive cennrifugal qcceowration. In the aboyz caldmlatimi, if we view thg situation hn a frame rotdtkny with an angular velocity of $u_t$, arotnd an sxls perpendiculwr tp botg $\vec{u}$ and the line of centers, pasaing thgough the center pf particle $0$, then particle $1$ had zero tangential gelocity, ane thq effect of tfe tangentpcl velocity can be represented by a centriwugal acceleratuob $a_1=k_j^2$. This substmtutiog is justificc by nmticing that we can gct exectlt the same expressionv as (\[eq:19\]) and (\[eq:20\]) by osing this aeceleration. We do not nwed rgally use wucf a rptzting vraje. We use $z_1$ as an effwctive centrifugal scsvkeration to deplacq ehe tangential component of the velocitj wifh the same effects.

Aftee these preparations, ae are in a much clearer position. Particle $1$ and particle $2$ sespertkveoy fqvf centrifugal accelerations $a_1$ and $a_2$, which are zlk pn the radial dircctions. Equation (\[ea:aor\]) ys again a goud appxkxjmation. Particle $1$ ls movigg on a line, agd sp is particle $2$. We can furthwr drop the nectir notation. In the following, ce use $u$ to denote the radial compunenf of the vepocity of oarticles $1$ and $2$ kmmvdiadely before a collision, wieh its powitire direcgion pointyng towardd the center of particle $0$. Condexuently, $a_1=-u_{1h}^2$ and $a_2=-u_{2t}^2$.

The equation set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]) reduces to $$\bebit{alpgned}
u_{n+1}^s & = & -ru_k^c+a_{n+1}^st_n \nonumbew \\
u_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frcc{1+r}{2}\cos\thzta\cdog u_n^c +a_{n+1}^ct_h \nonumuer \\
d_n & = & u_{n+1}^s\cdot t_n-\frac{1}{2}a_{t+1}^ft_n^2 \nonumber \\
-d_{n+1} & = & -
(\[eq:19\]) gives the quantity needed to complete set In order abbreviate this calculation, acceleration. the above calculation, we view the in a frame rotating with an velocity of $u_t$, around an axis perpendicular to both $\vec{u}$ and the line centers, passing through the center of particle $0$, then particle $1$ has zero velocity, the of tangential velocity can be represented by a centrifugal acceleration $a_1=u_t^2$. This substitution is justified by noticing we can get exactly the same expressions as and (\[eq:20\]) by using acceleration. We do not need use a rotating We $a_1$ an effective centrifugal to replace the tangential component of the velocity with the same effects. After these preparations, we are a much Particle $1$ particle respectively centrifugal accelerations $a_1$ which are all in the radial is again a good approximation. Particle $1$ is on a and so is particle $2$. We further drop the vector notation. In the following, use $u$ to denote the radial component of the velocity of particles $1$ and $2$ a collision, with its direction pointing towards center particle Consequently, and $a_2=-u_{2t}^2$. equation set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]) reduces to $$\begin{aligned} u_{n+1}^s & = & -ru_n^c+a_{n+1}^st_n \\ u_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frac{1+r}{2}\cos\theta\cdot u_n^c +a_{n+1}^ct_n \nonumber \\ = u_{n+1}^c\cdot t_n-\frac{1}{2}a_{n+1}^ct_n^2 \nonumber -d_{n+1} & = &
 (\[eq:19\]) gives the quantity needed tO complete tHe equAtiOn sEt (\[Eq:3a\])-(\[eQ:5\]). In oRder to abbreviaTE thiS calculation, we introducE an efFeCTive CEnTrifuGal acceLErATIon. in ThE abOvE CaLculaTioN, if we viEw the situaTioN iN a frame rotatINg With an anguLar Velocity of $u_t$, AroUnd an aXiS peRPendiCulAr to bOth $\vec{U}$ And the Line of cenTeRS, passiNG througH THe CentEr of particle $0$, then pARtICle $1$ has zero tangEntial VeLOcITY, anD thE effect of tHe TangeNTial velOCiTY CAn bE Represented by A centrifugaL AccEleratIoN $a_1=u_T^2$. this suBstitUtIOn iS justified bY notIcing that We can gET exactlY The same ExpresSioNs aS (\[eq:19\]) aND (\[eQ:20\]) bY usInG ThiS AcCelERatIon. We do nOt NeEd reaLly uSE SUCh a rOtaTing Frame. we use $a_1$ as an effEctIve cENtrIfugaL acceLeraTiOn to rEplace The taNgEntial component Of thE velocity WitH tHe sAmE effeCTs.

AfteR thEse PreparaTions, we ARe iN a MUCH cLearer position. PartIcLE $1$ AnD particlE $2$ respeCTiVeLY have cenTrIfuGal aCCEleraTionS $A_1$ aNd $a_2$, which Are all IN tHe Radial dIrEctionS. EQuaTioN (\[eq:apR\]) Is agAin a goOd approxImatiON. Particle $1$ is movINg on a line, and sO Is PARtICle $2$. WE caN further droP the VEctoR notATiOn. IN The foLlowiNg, WE uSE $u$ to denote the radial CoMponenT of thE velocity of paRticles $1$ and $2$ IMMEdiately BefoRE a COllision, with itS posiTive directIOn pointiNg towArds the cEnter of paRTIcle $0$. ConsEquEntLy, $a_1=-U_{1t}^2$ aND $A_2=-u_{2T}^2$.

The equation sET (\[Eq:3a\])-(\[eQ:5\]) rEduces tO $$\beGin{aligNed}
U_{n+1}^s & = & -Ru_n^C+a_{n+1}^St_N \nonumber \\
U_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frAc{1+R}{2}\cOs\ThEta\Cdot u_N^C +a_{n+1}^ct_n \noNuMbeR \\
d_N & = & u_{n+1}^C\cdot T_N-\frac{1}{2}a_{N+1}^ct_n^2 \nOnumBeR \\
-d_{N+1} & = & -
 (\[eq:19\]) gives the qua ntity need ed to  co mpl et e th e eq uation set (\[ e q:3a \])-(\[eq:5\]). In ord er to  a b brev i at e thi s calcu l at i o n,we  i ntr od u ce  an e ffe ctive c entrifugal  ac ce leration. In th e above ca lcu lation, if w e v iew th esit u ation  in  a fr ame ro t atingwith an a ng u lar ve l ocity o f $u _t$,  around an axis p e rp e ndicular to bo th $\v ec { u} $ and  th e line ofce nters ,  passin g  t h r o ugh the center of  particle $ 0 $,then p ar tic l e $1$has z er o  ta ngential ve loci ty, and t he eff e ct of t h e tange ntialvel oci ty c a nbe  re pr e sen t ed  by a c entrifug al  a ccele rati o n $ a_1= u_t ^2$.  This  substitution  is  jus t ifi ed by  noti cing  t hat w e canget e xa ctly the same e xpre ssions as  (\ [e q:1 9\ ]) an d  (\[eq :20 \])  by usi ng this acc el e r a ti on. We do not need  r e a ll y use su ch a r o ta ti n g frame.  W e u se $ a _ 1$ as  ane ff ective c entrif u ga lacceler at ion to  r epl ace  thet ange ntialcomponen t oft he velocity wi t h the same ef f ec t s .Afte r t hese prepar atio n s, w e ar e  i n a muchclear er po s ition. Particle $1$  a nd par ticle  $2$ respecti vely havec e n trifugal  acc e le r ations $a_1$ a nd $a _2$, which are allin th e radial  directio n s . Equati on(\[ eq: apr \ ] )is again a go o d  app ro ximatio n.Particl e $ 1$ismov in g on a li ne, andso  i spa rti cle $ 2 $. We ca nfur th erdropt he vec tor n otat io n. Inthe fol l ow i n g, w eus e $u $ t odenot e th e  ra dial co mponent o f t h e ve lo ci ty of p articles $1$an d $2$ imme di ate ly bef o r e a coll ision, with its positiv e  direct ion  poin ting  towardsthe  cente r o f  parti cle $0 $. Co ns equ e n tly,$ a _1 =-u _{ 1t}^2$ and $ a_2 =-u_{ 2t }^2$ .

Theequation set (\[eq : 3a\ ])-(\[eq:5\])  re duce s to  $$ \ be g in{ al i gne d } 
u_{n+1}^s & =& -ru_n^c+ a_ { n+ 1}^st_n \n o num be r \\
u_ {n+1}^c  & =&  u_n^s+ \frac{1+r }{2}\cos\ th eta\ c d otu_n^c +a_{ n+1}^ct_ n \nonumb e r \\d _n  & =& u _{n+1} ^c \cd ot t_ n-\fra c {1} {2}a_ {n+1}^ ct _n^2 \ nonum be r \\
-d_ {n+1} & = & -
 (\[eq:19\])_gives the_quantity needed to complete_the equation_set_(\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\]). In_order_to abbreviate this_calculation, we introduce_an effective centrifugal acceleration._In the above_calculation,_if we view the situation in a frame rotating with an angular velocity of_$u_t$,_around an_axis_perpendicular_to both $\vec{u}$ and the_line of centers, passing through_the center_of particle $0$, then particle $1$ has zero_tangential_velocity, and the_effect of the tangential velocity can be represented by_a centrifugal acceleration $a_1=u_t^2$. This substitution_is justified by_noticing_that_we can get exactly_the same expressions as (\[eq:19\]) and_(\[eq:20\]) by using this acceleration. We_do not need really use such a_rotating frame. We use $a_1$ as_an effective centrifugal acceleration to_replace the_tangential component of the velocity_with the same_effects.

After these_preparations, we are_in a much clearer position. Particle_$1$ and particle_$2$ respectively have centrifugal accelerations $a_1$_and_$a_2$, which are_all_in_the radial_directions. Equation (\[eq:apr\])_is_again a_good_approximation. Particle $1$ is moving on_a_line, and so is particle $2$. We_can further drop the_vector_notation. In the following,_we use $u$ to denote_the radial component of the velocity_of particles_$1$ and_$2$ immediately before a collision, with its positive direction pointing towards_the center of particle $0$. Consequently,_$a_1=-u_{1t}^2$ and $a_2=-u_{2t}^2$.

The equation_set (\[eq:3a\])-(\[eq:5\])_reduces_to $$\begin{aligned}
u_{n+1}^s &_=_& -ru_n^c+a_{n+1}^st_n_\nonumber \\
u_{n+1}^c & = & u_n^s+\frac{1+r}{2}\cos\theta\cdot u_n^c_+a_{n+1}^ct_n \nonumber_\\
d_n & = & u_{n+1}^c\cdot t_n-\frac{1}{2}a_{n+1}^ct_n^2_\nonumber \\
-d_{n+1} & =_&_-