 trivially true, we assume (and check later on the solution) that this implies $m_{\nu t}\ll J$ $\forall \nu$, such that we can assume linear response for all $\nu$. Schematically, there are two regimes, depending on whether $t \gg \nu^{-1}$ – in which case the corresponding density $\phi_\nu(x,t)$ has lost all its memory, or $t \ll \nu^{-1}$. In the former case the price trajectory follows Eq. , while in the latter case it is rather Eq.  that rules the dynamics. One thus has:

t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d\
t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d m\_  . \[densnux\]

Inverting Eqs.  and defining $\Psi(t) := 2/\sqrt{\pi t}$ yields (see Appendix B and in particular Eq. ):

t1 m\_[t]{} &=& [ L]{} \_0\^t d (t-)[x\_[ ]{}]{}\
t1 m\_[t]{} &=& L x\_[ t]{}  . \[nupetitgrand\]

Our approximation is to assume that $m_{\nu t}$ in Eq.  is effectively given by Eq.  as soon as $\nu<1/t$ and by Eq.  when $\nu>1/t$ such that Eq.  becomes: $$\begin{aligned}
\int_0^{1/t} \textrm d\nu \rho(\nu)\bigg[\int_0^t \textrm d\tau  \Psi(t-\tau){\dot x_{ \tau }}\bigg]+ \int_{1/t}^\infty \textrm d\nu \rho(\nu)  \bigg[\nu^{-1/2} \dot  x_{ t} \bigg] &=&\frac {m_t}{\mathcal L \sqrt{D}} \. \label{densnucentral}\end{aligned}$$ Equation  may be conveniently re-written as[^4] $\int_0^t \textrm d\tau \big[G(t) \Psi(t-\tau) + H(t)t_{\textrm c}^{1/2} \delta(t-\tau) \big] \dot x_\tau=  {m_t}/({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}})$. Formally inverting the kernel
trivially true, we assume (and check later on the solution) that this entail $ m_{\nu t}\ll J$ $ \forall \nu$, such that we can wear linear response for all $ \nu$. Schematically, there are two regimen, depending on whether $ t \gg \nu^{-1}$ – in which case the represent concentration $ \phi_\nu(x, t)$ has lost all its memory, or $ t \ll \nu^{-1}$. In the former case the price trajectory keep up Eq.  , while in the latter case it is quite Eq.    that rule the dynamics. One thus has: 

 t1 x\ _ [ t ] { } & = & \_0\^t d\ 
 t1 x\ _ [ t ] { } & = & \_0\^t d m\ _  . \[densnux\ ] 

 Inverting Eqs.    and defining $ \Psi(t): = 2/\sqrt{\pi t}$ yields (attend Appendix B and in particular Eq.   ): 

 t1 m\_[t ] { } & = & [ L ] { } \_0\^t d (t-)[x\ _ [ ] { } ] { } \ 
 t1 m\_[t ] { } & = & L x\ _ [ t ] { }  . \[nupetitgrand\ ] 

 Our approximation is to assume that $ m_{\nu t}$ in Eq.    is efficaciously given by Eq.    as soon as $ \nu<1 / t$ and by Eq.    when $ \nu>1 / t$ such that Eq.    become: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \int_0^{1 / t } \textrm d\nu \rho(\nu)\bigg[\int_0^t \textrm d\tau   \Psi(t-\tau){\dot x _ { \tau } } \bigg]+ \int_{1 / t}^\infty \textrm d\nu \rho(\nu)   \bigg[\nu^{-1/2 } \dot   x _ { t } \bigg ] & = & \frac { m_t}{\mathcal L \sqrt{D } } \. \label{densnucentral}\end{aligned}$$ Equation    may be conveniently re - write as[^4 ] $ \int_0^t \textrm d\tau \big[G(t) \Psi(t-\tau) + H(t)t_{\textrm c}^{1/2 } \delta(t-\tau) \big ] \dot x_\tau=   { m_t}/({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}})$. Formally inverting the kernel
 trlvially true, we assume (akd check later ou the smlutioh) that tfis implies $m_{\nu t}\ll J$ $\forall \ny$, sucy that we can assume lknear resionse for all $\bu$. Schematmdally, tmzre adc two cegimes, dependikg on whethar $t \gg \nu^{-1}$ – in wfieh case the corresponding density $\phy_\nu(x,t)$ hss lost all its iemogy, or $f \ll \nu^{-1}$. In the former case the pride trajtctory follows Eq. , ehile in the latter case ih is rather Eq.  that rupes the dynqmicf. One thus har:

t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d\
t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d j\_  . \[densnux\]

Inverting Eqs.  and defkning $\Psi(t) := 2/\sqrj{\'u t}$ iields (see A'pendiq B and in pavnicular Eq. ):

t1 m\_[t]{} &=& [ L]{} \_0\^t d (t-)[x\_[ ]{}]{}\
t1 k\_[t]{} &=& L z\_[ t]{}  . \[nupetitgrand\]

Our epproximation is to wssume thdt $m_{\nu t}$ in Eq.  is edfwctivgly ghven vy Dq.  zs skon as $\nu<1/v$ and by Eq.  when $\nu>1/t$ sych that Eq.  becomes: $$\bqtin{aligned}
\int_0^{1/f} \textwm d\nu \rho(\nu)\bigg[\int_0^t \textrm d\tau  \Psi(t-\tau){\got x_{ \tau }}\bigg]+ \int_{1/t}^\infty \twxtrm d\nu \rho(\nu)  \bigg[\ju^{-1/2} \dot  x_{ t} \bigg] &=&\frac {m_t}{\mathcal L \sqrt{D}} \. \label{densnucentran}\end{amkgntd}$$ Equaguoj  may be conveniently re-written as[^4] $\int_0^t \textri d\uau \big[G(t) \Psi(t-\tau) + H(t)t_{\textrm c}^{1/2} \drjta(t-\tau) \big] \dut x_\tab=  {j_t}/({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}})$. Vormalli inveeting the kermel
trivially true, we assume (and check later solution) this implies t}\ll J$ $\forall assume response for all Schematically, there are regimes, depending on whether $t \gg – in which case the corresponding density $\phi_\nu(x,t)$ has lost all its memory, $t \ll \nu^{-1}$. In the former case the price trajectory follows Eq. , in latter it rather Eq. that rules the dynamics. One thus has: t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d\ t1 t]{} &=& \_0\^t d m\_ . \[densnux\] Inverting and defining $\Psi(t) := t}$ yields (see Appendix B in Eq. ): m\_[t]{} [ \_0\^t d (t-)[x\_[ t1 m\_[t]{} &=& L x\_[ t]{} . \[nupetitgrand\] Our approximation is to assume that $m_{\nu t}$ in is effectively Eq. as as and Eq. when $\nu>1/t$ Eq. becomes: $$\begin{aligned} \int_0^{1/t} \textrm d\nu \Psi(t-\tau){\dot x_{ \tau }}\bigg]+ \int_{1/t}^\infty \textrm d\nu \rho(\nu) \dot x_{ \bigg] &=&\frac {m_t}{\mathcal L \sqrt{D}} \. Equation may be conveniently re-written as[^4] $\int_0^t \textrm \big[G(t) \Psi(t-\tau) + H(t)t_{\textrm c}^{1/2} \delta(t-\tau) \big] \dot x_\tau= {m_t}/({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}})$. Formally inverting the
 trivially true, we assume (and cHeck later oN the sOluTioN) tHat tHis iMplies $m_{\nu t}\ll J$ $\fORall \Nu$, such that we can assume lInear ReSPonsE FoR all $\nU$. SchemaTIcALLy, tHeRe Are TwO ReGimes, DepEnding oN whether $t \gG \nu^{-1}$ – In Which case the COrResponding DenSity $\phi_\nu(x,t)$ hAs lOst all ItS meMOry, or $T \ll \Nu^{-1}$. In tHe formER case tHe price trAjECtory fOLlows Eq. , WHIlE in tHe latter case it is rAThER Eq.  that rules thE dynamIcS. onE THus Has:

T1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d\
t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t d M\_  . \[dEnsnuX\]

invertiNG EQS.  ANd dEFining $\Psi(t) := 2/\sqrT{\pi t}$ yields (sEE ApPendix b aNd iN ParticUlar EQ. ):

t1 M\_[T]{} &=& [ L]{} \_0\^t D (t-)[x\_[ ]{}]{}\
t1 m\_[t]{} &=& L x\_[ t]{}  . \[nuPetiTgrand\]

Our ApproxIMation iS To assumE that $m_{\Nu t}$ In EQ.  is eFFeCtIveLy GIveN By eq.  aS SooN as $\nu<1/t$ anD bY EQ.  when $\Nu>1/t$ sUCH THat EQ.  beComeS: $$\begiN{aligned}
\int_0^{1/t} \tExtRm d\nU \Rho(\Nu)\bigG[\int_0^t \TextRm D\tau  \PSi(t-\tau){\Dot x_{ \tAu }}\Bigg]+ \int_{1/t}^\infty \teXtrm D\nu \rho(\nu)  \bIgg[\Nu^{-1/2} \Dot  X_{ t} \Bigg] &=&\fRAc {m_t}{\maThcAl L \Sqrt{D}} \. \laBel{densNUceNtRAL}\EnD{aligned}$$ Equation  maY bE COnVenientlY re-wriTTeN aS[^4] $\Int_0^t \textRm D\taU \big[g(T) \psi(t-\tAu) + H(t)T_{\TeXtrm c}^{1/2} \delTa(t-\tau) \BIg] \DoT x_\tau=  {m_t}/({\MaThcal L \SqRt{D}})$. forMally INverTing thE kernel
 trivially true, we assume  (and chec k lat eronth e so luti on) that thisi mpli es $m_{\nu t}\ll J$ $\ foral l\ nu$, su ch th at we c a na s sum eli nea rr es ponse  fo r all $ \nu$. Sche mat ic ally, therea re  two regim es,  depending o n w hether  $ t \ g g \nu ^{- 1}$ –  in wh i ch cas e the cor re s pondin g  densit y $\ phi_ \nu(x,t)$ has los t  a l l its memory,or $t\l l  \ n u ^{- 1}$ . In the f or mer c a se thep ri c e tra j ectory follow s Eq. , whi l e i n thela tte r  caseit is  r a the r Eq.  that  rul es the dy namics .  One th u s has:
t1 x\ _[t]{ } &= &  \ _0 \^t  d \ 
t1 x\ _[t ]{}  &=& \_0 \^ td m\_   .\ [ d e nsnu x\] 

In verti ng Eqs.  anddef inin g  $\ Psi(t ) :=2/\s qr t{\pi  t}$ y ields  ( see Appendix Bandin partic ula rEq.  ) :

t1 m\_[t] {}&=&  [ L]{}  \_0\^t d ( t- ) [ x \_ [ ]{}]{}\
t1 m\_[t ]{ } &= & L x\_[  t]{}.\[ n upetitgr an d\] 

Ou r appro xima t io n is toassume th at  $m_{\n ut}$ in  E q. is  effe c tive ly giv en by Eq .  as soon as $\nu<1 / t$ and by Eq.  w h e n$ \nu> 1/t $ such that  Eq.  bec omes :  $ $\b e gin{a ligne d} \i n t_0^{1/t} \textrm d \n u \rho (\nu) \bigg[\int_0^ t \textrmd \ t au  \Psi (t-\ t au ) {\dot x_{ \tau  }}\b igg]+ \int _ {1/t}^\i nfty\textrmd\nu \rho ( \ nu)  \bi gg[ \nu ^{- 1/2 } \d ot  x_{ t} \b i g g] & =& \frac { m_t }{\math cal  L\sq rt{ D} } \. \lab el{densn uc en tr al }\e nd{al i gned}$$Eq uat io n may b e  conve nient ly r e- wr i tte n as[^4 ]  $ \ i nt_0 ^t  \ text rmd\ tau \ big[ G (t)  \Psi(t -\tau) +H(t ) t_{\ te xt rm c}^{ 1/2} \delta(t -\ tau) \big]  \ dot  x_\ta u =   {m_t}/ ({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}}) $ . Forma lly  inve rtin g the ker nel 
 trivially_true, we_assume (and check later_on the_solution)_that this_implies_$m_{\nu t}\ll J$_$\forall \nu$, such_that we can assume_linear response for_all_$\nu$. Schematically, there are two regimes, depending on whether $t \gg \nu^{-1}$ – in_which_case the_corresponding_density_$\phi_\nu(x,t)$ has lost all its_memory, or $t \ll \nu^{-1}$._In the_former case the price trajectory follows Eq. , while_in_the latter case_it is rather Eq.  that rules the dynamics. One_thus has:

t1 x\_[ t]{} &=& \_0\^t_d\
t1 x\_[ t]{}_&=&_\_0\^t_d m\_  . \[densnux\]

Inverting_Eqs.  and defining $\Psi(t) := 2/\sqrt{\pi_t}$ yields (see Appendix B and_in particular Eq. ):

t1 m\_[t]{} &=& [ L]{}_\_0\^t d (t-)[x\_[ ]{}]{}\
t1 m\_[t]{} &=&_L x\_[ t]{}  . \[nupetitgrand\]

Our_approximation is_to assume that $m_{\nu t}$_in Eq.  is_effectively given_by Eq.  as_soon as $\nu<1/t$ and by Eq. _when $\nu>1/t$ such_that Eq.  becomes: $$\begin{aligned}
\int_0^{1/t} \textrm d\nu_\rho(\nu)\bigg[\int_0^t_\textrm d\tau _\Psi(t-\tau){\dot_x_{_\tau }}\bigg]+_\int_{1/t}^\infty \textrm d\nu_\rho(\nu)_ \bigg[\nu^{-1/2}_\dot_ x_{ t} \bigg] &=&\frac {m_t}{\mathcal_L_\sqrt{D}} \. \label{densnucentral}\end{aligned}$$ Equation  may be conveniently_re-written as[^4] $\int_0^t \textrm_d\tau_\big[G(t) \Psi(t-\tau) + H(t)t_{\textrm_c}^{1/2} \delta(t-\tau) \big] \dot x_\tau=_ {m_t}/({\mathcal L \sqrt{D}})$. Formally inverting_the kernel