W with the pseudogap phenomenon. Zelli, Kallin and Berlinsky[@ZelliQtmOscPhysRevB.86.104507] used the quasi-particle orbits produced by an uni-directional PDW order to produce quantum oscillations. A related proposal was recently made by M. Norman and J.C. Davis.[@Normanunpublished] We will comment on this below. Yu et al[@yuPNAS126672016magnetic] have interpreted their high magnetic field phase diagram in terms of a possible PDW. Two distinct pair fluctuation lifetimes have been reported in tunneling experiments, possibly indicative of the presence of two kinds of superconductors[@koren2016observation]. Other papers consider a PDW with the same wave-vector and on equal footing as the CDW and are less relevant to the present discussion[@PepinPhysRevB.90.195207; @WangPhysRevLett.114.197001].

Next, an interesting observation was made by Agterberg et al[@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502] that by shifting the momenta K from the zone boundary line, a new state is formed where the PDW carries momenta $P_1$ and a $P'_1$ which is not equal to ${-P_1}$ and similarly for $P'_2$. (see fig 1a) We shall refer to this state as canted PDW, referring to the canting of the pairing momenta as seen in fig 1a. Agterberg et al [@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502] showed that this state breaks time reversal and inversion symmetry, but preserves the product and that this is precisely the symmetry of the loop current model of Varma[@varma2006theory] which has been used to interpret the neutron scattering data.

Advanced numerical methods applied to the t-J models have found evidence for stripe-PDW as a competing state.[@PhysRevLett.113.046402] Interestingly the energy is found to be quite insensitive to the hole filing per period, in contrast to the original stripe picture which strongly prefers half a hole per period.

In the remaining of this paper, we address the adequacy of each of the following scenario’s as the explanation of the double period CDW, put in the broader context of the pseudogap phenomenology. (1) The Q/2 CDW is the primary order, while the Q CDW is subsidiary. (2) The Q/2
W with the pseudogap phenomenon. Zelli, Kallin and Berlinsky[@ZelliQtmOscPhysRevB.86.104507 ] used the quasi - particle orbits produced by an uni - directional PDW decree to grow quantum oscillations. A related proposal was recently made by M. Norman and J.C. Davis.[@Normanunpublished ] We will gloss on this below. Yu et al[@yuPNAS126672016magnetic ] have interpreted their high charismatic playing field phase diagram in terms of a potential PDW. Two discrete pair variation lifetimes have been reported in tunneling experiments, possibly indicative of the presence of two kind of superconductors[@koren2016observation ]. Other papers think a PDW with the same wave - vector and on equal foothold as the CDW and are less relevant to the present discussion[@PepinPhysRevB.90.195207; @WangPhysRevLett.114.197001 ]. 

 Next, an interesting observation was made by Agterberg et al[@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502 ] that by shifting the momentum K from the zone boundary line, a new state of matter is formed where the PDW carry momenta $ P_1 $ and a $ P'_1 $ which is not equal to $ { -P_1}$ and similarly for $ P'_2$. (see fig 1a) We shall refer to this state as cant PDW, referring to the canting of the pairing momenta as seen in fig 1a. Agterberg et al [ @Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502 ] showed that this department of state breaks time reversal and inversion symmetry, but preserves the product and that this is precisely the symmetry of the loop current model of Varma[@varma2006theory ] which has been use to interpret the neutron scattering datum. 

 advance numerical methods applied to the t - J models have determine evidence for stripe - PDW as a competing state.[@PhysRevLett.113.046402 ] Interestingly the energy is found to be quite insensitive to the fix filing per period, in contrast to the original stripe picture which strongly prefers half a hole per menstruation. 

 In the remaining of this paper, we address the adequacy of each of the following scenario ’s as the explanation of the bivalent period CDW, arrange in the broad context of the pseudogap phenomenology. (1) The Q/2 CDW is the primary order, while the Q CDW is subsidiary. (2) The Q/2
W wlth the pseudogap phenomtnon. Zelli, Kallin and Beclinsky[@AelliQtmUscPhysRevB.86.104507] used the quasi-pacticoe orvits produced by an unk-directiojal PDW irdec to produce quaifum oscljlatjlns. C celated proposak was recettly made by M. Nurlan and J.C. Davis.[@Normanunpublished] Wq will volment on this feloe. Yu sn cl[@yuPNAS126672016magnetic] have interpretsd theig high magnetic foeld phase diagram in termd of a possible PDW. Twl distinct kzir dluctuation uifetimes have been rekorted in tunneling experiments, oossiyly indicatuvw ov the presenre of nwo kinds of superconguctors[@loren2016observatipn]. Mthwr papers consider a 'DW with the same wade-vector dnb on equal footing as tye CDF ang ard lers dekebant tl tie present siscussion[@PwpinPhysRevB.90.195207; @WangPhusWvfLett.114.197001].

Next, an interqseing observation was made by Agterberg tt al[@Zgt2PhysRevB.91.054502] that by shidting the momenta K ftom the zoge boundary line, a new state is formed where the [DW cerfiew iunejta $P_1$ and a $P'_1$ which is not equal to ${-P_1}$ and simymatlj for $P'_2$. (see fig 1a) We shall rrffr jo this state xs cancsd PDW, referring to hhe canjing od the paiwing momenta as seen in fig 1a. Atterberg et cl [@Qgt2PhysRevB.91.054502] showed that this rtatg breals time reversal and inrersioh symmetry, hut presedxes the product xnd tvat this is precisely the fymmetry if tke loop zurrgnt modql of Varmw[@varma2006theory] which has bfen udeg to interoret the neutron scattering date.

Edvanced numeticdl kethods cppliec to the t-J mjdels have fouud evideuce fof stripe-PDS as a rompeting stwte.[@PhysRevLetd.113.046402] Interestingny the egergt is found gu be quite insrnsitive no the hole filing per pcriod, jn contrast to cke original stripr pkcttrv wiich fdrongly prefars falw a houe per kzriia.

In yhe remaining of thiv paler, we address the aqequacy if each jf the followong scenario’s as tje ex'lanatmon of thg double period CDW, put in the groader clntcxt of the psqudonap khenomenoloyy. (1) The Q/2 CDW is the primary order, while the Q CDW is subsudiary. (2) The Q/2
W with the pseudogap phenomenon. Zelli, Kallin used quasi-particle orbits by an uni-directional oscillations. related proposal was made by M. and J.C. Davis.[@Normanunpublished] We will comment this below. Yu et al[@yuPNAS126672016magnetic] have interpreted their high magnetic field phase diagram terms of a possible PDW. Two distinct pair fluctuation lifetimes have been reported tunneling possibly of presence of two kinds of superconductors[@koren2016observation]. Other papers consider a PDW with the same wave-vector and equal footing as the CDW and are less to the present discussion[@PepinPhysRevB.90.195207; Next, an interesting observation was by et al[@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502] by the K from the boundary line, a new state is formed where the PDW carries momenta $P_1$ and a $P'_1$ which not equal and similarly $P'_2$. fig We shall refer state as canted PDW, referring to the pairing momenta as seen in fig 1a. et al showed that this state breaks time and inversion symmetry, but preserves the product and this is precisely the symmetry of the loop current model of Varma[@varma2006theory] which has been interpret the neutron scattering Advanced numerical methods to t-J have evidence for as a competing state.[@PhysRevLett.113.046402] Interestingly the energy is found to be insensitive to the hole filing per period, in contrast to stripe which strongly prefers a hole per period. the of this paper, we adequacy each scenario’s the of the double period put in the broader context the pseudogap phenomenology. (1) primary order, while the Q CDW is subsidiary. The Q/2
W with the pseudogap phenomenOn. Zelli, KalLin anD BeRliNsKy[@ZeLliQTmOscPhysRevB.86.104507] uSEd thE quasi-particle orbits prOduceD bY An unI-DiRectiOnal PDW ORdER To pRoDuCe qUaNTuM osciLlaTions. A rElated propOsaL wAs recently maDE bY M. Norman anD J.C. davis.[@NormanuNpuBlisheD] WE wiLL commEnt On thiS below. yU et al[@yUPNAS126672016magnEtIC] have iNTerpretED ThEir hIgh magnetic field pHAsE Diagram in terms Of a posSiBLe pdw. TwO diStinct pair FlUctuaTIon lifeTImES HAve BEen reported in Tunneling exPEriMents, pOsSibLY indicAtive Of THe pResence of twO kinDs of superConducTOrs[@koreN2016ObservaTion]. OtHer PapErs cONsIdEr a pDw WitH ThE saME waVe-vector AnD oN equaL fooTING As thE CDw and Are leSs relevant to tHe pReseNT diScussIon[@PePinPHySRevB.90.195207; @wangPhYsRevleTt.114.197001].

Next, an interesTing ObservatiOn wAs MadE bY AgteRBerg et Al[@AGt2PHysRevB.91.054502] That by sHIftInG THE mOmenta K from the zone BoUNDaRy line, a nEw statE Is FoRMed where ThE PDw carRIEs momEnta $p_1$ AnD a $P'_1$ which Is not eQUaL tO ${-P_1}$ and siMiLarly fOr $p'_2$. (seE fiG 1a) We sHAll rEfer to This statE as caNTed PDW, referrinG To the canting oF ThE PAiRIng mOmeNta as seen in Fig 1a. aGterBerg ET aL [@AgT2physREvB.91.054502] shOwED tHAt this state breaks tiMe ReversAl and Inversion symmEtry, but preSERVes the prOducT AnD That this is precIsely The symmetrY Of the looP currEnt model Of Varma[@vaRMA2006theory] wHicH haS beEn uSED tO interpret the NEUtroN sCatteriNg dAta.

AdvaNceD nuMerIcaL mEthods appLied to thE t-j mOdElS haVe fouND evidencE fOr sTrIpe-pDW as A CompetIng stAte.[@PHySREVLeTt.113.046402] InterEStINGly tHe EnErgy Is fOuNd to bE quiTE inSensitiVe to the hoLe fILing PeR pEriod, in Contrast to the OrIginal striPe PicTure whICH stronglY prefers half a hole per perIOd.

In the RemAininG of tHis paper, wE adDress tHe aDEquacy Of each Of the FoLloWINg sceNARiO’s aS tHe explanatION of The doUbLe peRiod CDW, Put in the broader conTExt Of the pseudogaP phEnomENOlOgy. (1) tHe q/2 cDW Is THe pRIMary order, while tHe Q CDW is suBsIDiAry. (2) The Q/2
W with the pseudogap pheno menon. Zel li, K all inan d Be rlin sky[@ZelliQtmO s cPhy sRevB.86.104507] usedthe q ua s i-pa r ti cle o rbits p r od u c edby  a n u ni - di recti ona l PDW o rder to pr odu ce  quantum osc i ll ations. Arel ated proposa l w as rec en tly madebyM. No rman a n d J.C.  Davis.[@ No r manunp u blished ] We  wil l comment on this be l ow. Yu et al[@ yuPNAS 12 6 67 2 0 16m agn etic] have  i nterp r eted th e ir h i ghm agnetic field  phase diag r amin ter ms  of a poss iblePD W . T wo distinct  pai r fluctua tion l i fetimes have be en rep ort edin t u nn el ing  e x per i me nts ,  po ssibly i nd ic ative  oft h e pres enc e of  twokinds of supe rco nduc t ors [@kor en201 6obs er vatio n]. Ot her p ap ers consider aPDWwith thesam ewav e- vecto r  and o n e qua l footi ng as t h e C DW a n dare less relevantto t he  present  discu s si on [ @PepinPh ys Rev B.90 . 1 95207 ; @W a ng PhysRevL ett.11 4 .1 97 001].
Ne xt, an  i nte res tingo bser vation  was mad e byA gterberg et al [ @Agt2PhysRevB . 91 . 0 54 5 02]tha t by shifti ng t h e mo ment a  K  fr o m the  zone  b o un d ary line, a new sta te  is fo rmedwhere the PDW  carries m o m e nta $P_1 $ an d  a $P'_1$ which i s not  equal to$ {-P_1}$and s imilarly  for $P'_ 2 $ . (see f ig1a)  We  sh a l lrefer to this s tate  a s cante d P DW, ref err ing  to  th ecanting o f the pa ir in gmo men ta as seen infi g 1 a.  Ag terbe r g et a l [@A gt2P hy sR e vB. 91.0545 0 2] s howe dth at t his  s tatebrea k s t ime rev ersal and  in v ersi on  s ymmetry , but preserv es  the produ ct  an d that t his is p recisely the symmetry o f  the lo opcurre nt m odel of V arm a[@var ma2 0 06theo ry] wh ich h as  be e n  used t oint er pret the n e u tro n sca tt erin g data. 

Advanced numeric a l m ethods applie d t o th e t- J m o de l s h av e  fo u n d evidence forstripe-PDW  a s  a  competing sta te .[@Phys RevLett .113. 0 46402]Interesti ngly theen ergy i s f ound to be  quite i nsensitiv e  to t h eholefil ing pe rper iod,in con t ras t tothe or ig inal s tripe  p icture w hich strongly prefers h alf aholeper  period.
In the  remainin g of  this pape r,weaddre sst he ad equa c yofe ach o f th e  followin g  s cen a r io ’s as the e x p l ana tionoft he dou bleperiod CDW, put i n  the broader c onte x t  of  th e  pse ud ogap phenomeno log y. ( 1) The Q /2  CDW is the  primary  o r der,whilethe QCDW iss u bs i diary.  (2)  Th e Q/2
W with_the pseudogap_phenomenon. Zelli, Kallin and_Berlinsky[@ZelliQtmOscPhysRevB.86.104507] used_the_quasi-particle orbits_produced_by an uni-directional_PDW order to_produce quantum oscillations. A_related proposal was_recently_made by M. Norman and J.C. Davis.[@Normanunpublished] We will comment on this below. Yu_et_al[@yuPNAS126672016magnetic] have_interpreted_their_high magnetic field phase diagram_in terms of a possible_PDW. Two_distinct pair fluctuation lifetimes have been reported in_tunneling_experiments, possibly indicative_of the presence of two kinds of superconductors[@koren2016observation]. Other_papers consider a PDW with the_same wave-vector and_on_equal_footing as the CDW_and are less relevant to the_present discussion[@PepinPhysRevB.90.195207; @WangPhysRevLett.114.197001].

Next, an interesting observation_was made by Agterberg et al[@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502] that_by shifting the momenta K from_the zone boundary line, a_new state_is formed where the PDW_carries momenta $P_1$_and a_$P'_1$ which is_not equal to ${-P_1}$ and similarly_for $P'_2$. (see_fig 1a) We shall refer to_this_state as canted_PDW,_referring_to the_canting of the_pairing_momenta as_seen_in fig 1a. Agterberg et al_[@Agt2PhysRevB.91.054502]_showed that this state breaks time reversal_and inversion symmetry, but_preserves_the product and that_this is precisely the symmetry_of the loop current model of_Varma[@varma2006theory] which_has been_used to interpret the neutron scattering data.

Advanced numerical methods applied to_the t-J models have found evidence_for stripe-PDW as a_competing state.[@PhysRevLett.113.046402]_Interestingly_the energy is_found_to be_quite insensitive to the hole filing per_period, in_contrast to the original stripe picture_which strongly prefers half_a_hole per period.

In the remaining of_this paper, we address the adequacy_of each of the following_scenario’s_as_the explanation of the double_period CDW, put in the broader_context of the_pseudogap phenomenology. (1) The Q/2 CDW is_the_primary order, while the Q CDW_is_subsidiary. (2) The Q/2