K-1$. Introduce the sets $\mathcal
{S}_{k}({x}) = \{Y_i\dvtx  i/n \in{\mathcal{N}}_{k}({x})\}$, and note that its cardinality $\bar n_k({x}):= \# \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ satisfies $n h_k \leq\bar n_k({x})\leq2 nh_k + 1$. Let us rearrange the sample in $\mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ as $$Y_{1,\bar n_{k}({x})}, Y_{2,\bar n_{k}({x})},\ldots, Y_{\bar
n_{k}({x}),\bar n_{k}({x})},$$ where $Y_{j,\bar n_{k}({x})}$ denotes the $j$th largest $Y_{i} \in
\mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$. For each $k = 0,\ldots,K-1$, let ${m}_k =
{m}(\bar n_{k}({x}) )$ such that ${m}_k/\bar n_k \to0$, where $\bar n_k = \bar n_k({x})$ to lighten the notation. In the literature, a common parametrization of ${m}_k$ is ${m}_k = {\bar
n_k}^{\mathfrak{m}}$ for $0 < \mathfrak{m}\leq1$. Before discussing the important issue of possible choices of $\mathfrak{m}$, we formally introduce our estimation procedure. Apart from the necessary location invariance, an estimator of ${A}_{{x}}(y)$ should also adapt to the unknown smoothness degree of the parameters ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$, ${{\mathfrak{b}}}_{{x}}$ and ${{\mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$. A related issue is dealt with in the literature; see, for instance, Drees [@drees2001] or Grama and Spokoiny [@gramaspokoiny2008]. In order to achieve this adaptivity, we apply a Lepski-type procedure to select among appropriate base estimators. We first tackle the problem of estimating ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$. Using Falk’s idea in [@falk1995], we define $$\qquad\frac{1}{\hat{{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}} ({m}_k )} = \frac{1}{{m}_k}\sum_{i = 2}^{{m}_k -1
K-1$. Introduce the sets $ \mathcal 
 { S}_{k}({x }) = \{Y_i\dvtx   i / n \in{\mathcal{N}}_{k}({x})\}$, and note that its cardinality $ \bar n_k({x}):= \ # \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ satisfies $ n h_k \leq\bar n_k({x})\leq2 nh_k + 1$. lease us rearrange the sample distribution in $ \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ as $ $ Y_{1,\bar n_{k}({x }) }, Y_{2,\bar n_{k}({x})},\ldots, Y_{\bar 
 n_{k}({x}),\bar n_{k}({x})},$$ where $ Y_{j,\bar n_{k}({x})}$ denotes the $ j$th largest $ Y_{i } \in 
 \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$. For each $ thousand = 0,\ldots, K-1 $, get $ { m}_k = 
 { m}(\bar n_{k}({x }) ) $ such that $ { m}_k/\bar n_k \to0 $, where $ \bar n_k = \bar n_k({x})$ to lighten the notation. In the literature, a coarse parametrization of $ { m}_k$ is $ { m}_k = { \bar 
 n_k}^{\mathfrak{m}}$ for $ 0 < \mathfrak{m}\leq1$. Before hash out the important topic of possible choices of $ \mathfrak{m}$, we formally precede our estimation procedure. aside from the necessary location invariance, an estimator of $ { A}_{{x}}(y)$ should also adapt to the unknown smoothness degree of the parameter $ { { \mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$, $ { { \mathfrak{b}}}_{{x}}$ and $ { { \mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$. A related issue is dealt with in the literature; see, for example, Drees   [ @drees2001 ] or Grama and Spokoiny   [ @gramaspokoiny2008 ]. In order to achieve this adaptivity, we apply a Lepski - type procedure to choose among appropriate base calculator. We first tackle the problem of estimating $ { { \mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$. use Falk ’s idea in   [ @falk1995 ], we define $ $ \qquad\frac{1}{\hat{{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x } } ({ m}_k) } = \frac{1}{{m}_k}\sum_{i = 2}^{{m}_k -1
K-1$. Ijtroduce the sets $\mathcau
{S}_{k}({x}) = \{Y_i\dvtx  i/u \in{\matical{N}}_{k}({x})\}$, and notd that its cardinality $\bar n_n({x}):= \# \matycal{S}_{k}({x})$ satisfies $n h_k \leq\bar n_n({x})\leq2 nh_j + 1$. Owt us rearcznge thc samlpe iu $\nathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ as $$I_{1,\bar n_{k}({x})}, Y_{2,\bas n_{k}({x})},\ldots, Y_{\bas
n_{y}({x}),\yar n_{k}({x})},$$ where $Y_{j,\bar n_{k}({x})}$ denotes the $t$th larbedt $Y_{i} \in
\mathcaj{S}_{k}({x})$. Sor sach $k = 0,\ldots,K-1$, let ${m}_k =
{m}(\bar n_{k}({x}) )$ sudh that ${m}_k/\bar n_k \to0$, ehere $\bar n_k = \bar n_k({x})$ to llghtfn the notation. In the literajhre, q common parxmetrization of ${m}_k$ is ${j}_k = {\bar
n_k}^{\mathfrak{m}}$ for $0 < \mathfrxk{m}\lea1$. Before dusxusdhng the impirtann issue of possible cvoices pf $\mathfrak{m}$, wc forkaloy introduce our estikation procedure. Akart from dhz necessary location uncariatce, dn errimxtod pf ${A}_{{x}}(y)$ sjoumd also adzpt to the ynknown smoothness cedgre of the padametews ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$, ${{\mathfrak{b}}}_{{x}}$ and ${{\mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$. A remated issue is dealt wirh in the literature; dee, for igstance, Drees [@drees2001] or Grama and Spokoiny [@gramaspokminy2008]. Mn orbcv to qcjieve this adaptivity, we apply a Lepski-type pwkctduge to select amonn appropriate base edtoiators. We firrt tackle the problem of eshimatind ${{\matyfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$. Ufing Falk’s idea in [@falk1995], we definw $$\qquad\frac{1}{\hct{{\mqthfrak{a}}}_{{x}} ({m}_k )} = \frae{1}{{m}_k}\sum_{i = 2}^{{m}_k -1
K-1$. Introduce the sets $\mathcal {S}_{k}({x}) = \in{\mathcal{N}}_{k}({x})\}$, note that cardinality $\bar n_k({x}):= \leq\bar nh_k + 1$. us rearrange the in $\mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ as $$Y_{1,\bar n_{k}({x})}, Y_{2,\bar Y_{\bar n_{k}({x}),\bar n_{k}({x})},$$ where $Y_{j,\bar n_{k}({x})}$ denotes the $j$th largest $Y_{i} \in \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$. each $k = 0,\ldots,K-1$, let ${m}_k = {m}(\bar n_{k}({x}) )$ such that ${m}_k/\bar \to0$, $\bar = n_k({x})$ to lighten the notation. In the literature, a common parametrization of ${m}_k$ is ${m}_k = n_k}^{\mathfrak{m}}$ for $0 < \mathfrak{m}\leq1$. Before discussing the issue of possible choices $\mathfrak{m}$, we formally introduce our procedure. from the location an of ${A}_{{x}}(y)$ should adapt to the unknown smoothness degree of the parameters ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$, ${{\mathfrak{b}}}_{{x}}$ and ${{\mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$. A related issue is with in see, for Drees or and Spokoiny [@gramaspokoiny2008]. to achieve this adaptivity, we apply to select among appropriate base estimators. We first the problem estimating ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$. Using Falk’s idea in we define $$\qquad\frac{1}{\hat{{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}} ({m}_k )} = \frac{1}{{m}_k}\sum_{i = -1
K-1$. Introduce the sets $\mathcal
{S}_{K}({x}) = \{Y_i\dvtx  i/n \In{\matHcaL{N}}_{k}({X})\}$, aNd noTe thAt its cardinaliTY $\bar N_k({x}):= \# \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ satisfies $N h_k \leQ\bAR n_k({x})\LEq2 Nh_k + 1$. LeT us rearRAnGE The SaMpLe iN $\mAThCal{S}_{k}({X})$ as $$y_{1,\bar n_{k}({x})}, y_{2,\bar n_{k}({x})},\ldoTs, Y_{\BaR
n_{k}({x}),\bar n_{k}({x})},$$ whERe $y_{j,\bar n_{k}({x})}$ deNotEs the $j$th largEst $y_{i} \in
\maThCal{s}_{K}({x})$. For EacH $k = 0,\ldoTs,K-1$, let ${M}_K =
{m}(\bar n_{K}({x}) )$ such thaT ${m}_K/\Bar n_k \tO0$, Where $\baR N_K = \bAr n_k({X})$ to lighten the notaTIoN. in the literaturE, a commOn PArAMEtrIzaTion of ${m}_k$ is ${M}_k = {\Bar
n_k}^{\MAthfrak{M}}$ FoR $0 < \MAThfRAk{m}\leq1$. Before dIscussing thE ImpOrtant IsSue OF possiBle chOiCEs oF $\mathfrak{m}$, wE forMally intrOduce oUR estimaTIon procEdure. AParT frOm thE NeCeSsaRy LOcaTIoN inVAriAnce, an esTiMaTor of ${a}_{{x}}(y)$ sHOULD alsO adApt tO the uNknown smoothnEss DegrEE of The paRametErs ${{\mAtHfrak{A}}}_{{x}}$, ${{\mathFrak{b}}}_{{X}}$ aNd ${{\mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$. A reLateD issue is dEalT wIth In The liTEraturE; seE, foR instanCe, Drees [@DReeS2001] oR gRAmA and Spokoiny [@gramasPoKOInY2008]. In order To achiEVe ThIS adaptivItY, we ApplY A lepskI-typE PrOcedure tO selecT AmOnG appropRiAte basE eStiMatOrs. We FIrst Tackle The problEm of eSTimating ${{\mathfrAK{a}}}_{{x}}$. Using Falk’s IDeA IN [@fALk1995], we DefIne $$\qquad\fraC{1}{\hat{{\MAthfRak{a}}}_{{X}} ({M}_k )} = \FraC{1}{{M}_k}\sum_{I = 2}^{{m}_k -1
K-1$. Introduce the sets $ \mathcal
{ S}_{k }({ x})  =  \{Y _i\d vtx  i/n \in{\ m athc al{N}}_{k}({x})\}$, an d not et hati ts  card inality $\ b a r n _k ({ x}) := \#  \mat hca l{S}_{k }({x})$ sa tis fi es $n h_k \l e q\ bar n_k({x })\ leq2 nh_k +1$.  Let u srea r range  th e sam ple in $\math cal{S}_{k }( { x})$ a s  $$Y_{1 , \ ba r n_ {k}({x})}, Y_{2,\ b ar n_{k}({x})},\l dots,Y_ { \b a r 
n_ {k} ({x}),\bar  n _{k}( { x})},$$ wh e r e  $Y _ {j,\bar n_{k} ({x})}$ den o tes  the $ j$ thl argest  $Y_{ i} \in 
\mathcal{S }_{k }({x})$.For ea c h $k =0 ,\ldots ,K-1$,  le t $ {m}_ k  = 
{ m}( \b a r n _ {k }({ x }))$ suchth at  ${m} _k/\ b a r n_k\to 0$,where  $\bar n_k =\ba r n_ k ({x })$ t o lig hten  t he no tation . Inth e literature, a  com mon param etr iz ati on  of $ { m}_k$is${m }_k = { \bar
n_ k }^{ \m a t h fr ak{m}}$ for $0 < \ ma t h fr ak{m}\le q1$. B e fo re discussi ng  th e im p o rtant  iss u eof possi ble ch o ic es  of $\m at hfrak{ m} $,weforma l ly i ntrodu ce our e stima t ion procedure. Apart from th e  n e c es s aryloc ation invar ianc e , an  est i ma tor of ${ A}_{{ x} } (y ) $ should also adapt  t o theunkno wn smoothness  degree of t h e parame ters ${ { \mathfrak{a}}} _{{x} }$, ${{\ma t hfrak{b} }}_{{ x}}$ and  ${{\math f r ak{c}}}_ {{x }}$ . A  re l a te d issue is de a l t wi th  in the  li teratur e;see , f orin stance, D rees [@d re es 20 01 ] o r Gra m a and Sp ok oin y[@g ramas p okoiny 2008] . In  o rd e r t o achie v et h is a da pt ivit y,we  appl y aL eps ki-type  procedur e t o  sel ec tamong a ppropriate ba se  estimator s.  We  first t ackle th e problem of estimating ${{\mat hfr ak{a} }}_{ {x}}$. Us ing  Falk’ s i d ea in[@falk 1995] ,wed e fine$ $ \q qua d\ frac{1}{\h a t {{\ mathf ra k{a} }}_{{x} } ({m}_k )} = \fra c {1} {{m}_k}\sum_{ i =  2}^ { { m} _k- 1
K-1$. Introduce_the sets_$\mathcal
{S}_{k}({x}) = \{Y_i\dvtx _i/n \in{\mathcal{N}}_{k}({x})\}$,_and_note that_its_cardinality $\bar n_k({x}):=_\# \mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ satisfies_$n h_k \leq\bar n_k({x})\leq2_nh_k + 1$._Let_us rearrange the sample in $\mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$ as $$Y_{1,\bar n_{k}({x})}, Y_{2,\bar n_{k}({x})},\ldots, Y_{\bar
n_{k}({x}),\bar n_{k}({x})},$$ where_$Y_{j,\bar_n_{k}({x})}$ denotes_the_$j$th_largest $Y_{i} \in
\mathcal{S}_{k}({x})$. For each_$k = 0,\ldots,K-1$, let ${m}_k_=
{m}(\bar n_{k}({x})_)$ such that ${m}_k/\bar n_k \to0$, where $\bar_n_k_= \bar n_k({x})$_to lighten the notation. In the literature, a common_parametrization of ${m}_k$ is ${m}_k =_{\bar
n_k}^{\mathfrak{m}}$ for $0_<_\mathfrak{m}\leq1$._Before discussing the important_issue of possible choices of $\mathfrak{m}$,_we formally introduce our estimation procedure._Apart from the necessary location invariance, an_estimator of ${A}_{{x}}(y)$ should also adapt_to the unknown smoothness degree_of the_parameters ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$, ${{\mathfrak{b}}}_{{x}}$ and ${{\mathfrak{c}}}_{{x}}$._A related issue_is dealt_with in the_literature; see, for instance, Drees [@drees2001] or_Grama and Spokoiny [@gramaspokoiny2008]._In order to achieve this adaptivity,_we_apply a Lepski-type_procedure_to_select among_appropriate base estimators._We_first tackle_the_problem of estimating ${{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}}$. Using Falk’s_idea_in [@falk1995], we define $$\qquad\frac{1}{\hat{{\mathfrak{a}}}_{{x}} ({m}_k )} =_\frac{1}{{m}_k}\sum_{i = 2}^{{m}_k -1