 be found in one of the three possible phases (extended, $\theta$-phase, or globule phase), whereas a solitary 2D chain is always extended. Depending on the values of the inter-chain interaction parameters ($v$ in the case of ASAWs model, and $w$ and $t$ in the case of CSAWs model), the system can be either in the segregated phase, when the chains can be considered as almost independent, or in phases in which the number of contacts between the chains is comparable with their length (entangled phases). For both models, there is a critical line in the plane of the interaction parameters ($v_c(u)$ for ASAWs, and, $w_c(u,t)$, with fixed $t$, for CSAWs model), which divides it into areas corresponding to segregated and entangled phases. In the case of the ASAWs model, for $v\geq v_c(u)$, the average number $\langle M\rangle$ of contacts between the two polymers scales with the average length $\langle N_3\rangle$ of the 3D chain as $\langle M\rangle \sim
{\langle N_3\rangle}^\phi$. Different values of the contact exponent $\phi$ correspond to $v=v_c(u)$ and $v>v_c(u)$, and, in addition, $\phi$ also depends on the strength of the intra-chain interaction parameter $u$. However, in all entangled phases large parts of the 3D chain remain in the bulk, beyond the scope of the inter-chain interaction, since the prohibition of crossings between two chains hinders their complete entanglement, even for extremely large values of $v$. On the contrary, in CSAWs model for $w>w_c(u,t)$ the two chains are completely entangled, while they only partially cover each other at the critical line $w=w_c(u,t)$, where the scaling relation $\langle M\rangle \sim {\langle
N_3\rangle}^\varphi$ is satisfied, and where $\varphi$ takes different values in the intra-chain interaction regions $u<u_\theta$, $u=u_\theta$, and $u>u_\theta$.

In the end, we would like to point out that for ASAWs model, in the space of interaction parameters, the arrangement of possible phases is approximately the same, as in the case of the surface-interacting polymer chain
be found in one of the three possible phases (extended, $ \theta$-phase, or globule phase), whereas a alone 2D range is always extended. depend on the value of the inter - chain interaction parameters ($ v$ in the case of ASAWs mannequin, and $ w$ and $ t$ in the character of CSAWs model), the arrangement can be either in the segregated phase, when the chains can be considered as about independent, or in phases in which the number of contacts between the chain is comparable with their length (entangled phases). For both models, there is a critical channel in the plane of the interaction parameters ($ v_c(u)$ for ASAWs, and, $ w_c(u, t)$, with fixed $ t$, for CSAWs mannequin), which divides it into areas corresponding to segregated and entangled phase. In the case of the ASAWs model, for $ v\geq v_c(u)$, the average number $ \langle M\rangle$ of contacts between the two polymer scales with the average length $ \langle N_3\rangle$ of the 3D chain as $ \langle M\rangle \sim 
 { \langle N_3\rangle}^\phi$. Different values of the liaison advocate $ \phi$ match to $ v = v_c(u)$ and $ v > v_c(u)$, and, in addition, $ \phi$ also depends on the strength of the intra - chain interaction parameter $ u$. However, in all entangle phase large parts of the 3D range persist in the majority, beyond the scope of the inter - chain interaction, since the prohibition of crossings between two chains hinders their complete entanglement, even for extremely large value of $ v$. On the contrary, in CSAWs model for $ w > w_c(u, t)$ the two chains are completely entangle, while they only partially cover each other at the critical line $ watt = w_c(u, t)$, where the scaling relation $ \langle M\rangle \sim { \langle 
 N_3\rangle}^\varphi$ is quenched, and where $ \varphi$ subscribe different values in the intra - chain interaction regions $ u < u_\theta$, $ u = u_\theta$, and $ u > u_\theta$. 

 In the end, we would like to charge out that for ASAWs model, in the space of interaction parameters, the arrangement of potential phases is approximately the same, as in the case of the surface - interacting polymer range
 be found in one of the thrte possible phases (extenved, $\thefa$-phase, ur globule phase), whereas a sllutary 2D chain is always extdnded. Depvnding on the calues of vge intev-ehain lnterccvion parameters ($v$ in the wase of ASAWs koaep, and $w$ and $t$ in the case of CSAWs iodel), tne system can be eitnqr ih the segregated phase, when the chzins cai be considered as almost independent, or ln pjases in which the number of xontwxts between ghe chains is comparabme with their length (entangled ohasex). For both midepv, there is e critpcal line in bne plate of tne interaction pacamerers ($v_c(u)$ for ASAWs, anv, $w_c(u,t)$, with fixed $t$, sor CSAWs mkdel), which dividew ut injo araas zirrdspknvinf to sfgrxgated and sntangled pyases. In the case og eye ASAWs modem, for $d\gqq v_c(u)$, the average number $\langle M\ranglt$ of dontacts between the twi polymers scales witj the avewage length $\langle N_3\rangle$ of the 3D chain as $\langne M\renele \slm
{\lavtlf N_3\rangle}^\phi$. Different values of the contact qsppnvnt $\phi$ corresponb to $v=v_c(u)$ and $v>v_v(u)$, amq, in addition, $\phi$ also depends on the stgength jf thw intra-chwin onteraction parameter $u$. Howwver, in all vntabgled phases large parts of tke 3D cnain temain in the bulk, beyoud the scope of tje inter-cgxin interaction, rinbe tve prohibition of crossingf between two chains hincers treir complfte ekdanglement, even fog exttemely large valkes of $v$. On the contrary, in CSAXx model for $e>w_w(u,t)$ the two chaiks are completejy entangled, wkile thev only partially cover xach other ae the critican line $w=w_c(u,t)$, xhere the scaoing relatiuv $\langle M\rangke \sim {\lauyle
N_3\ranglw}^\varphi$ is satisficd, ana where $\varphi$ tcyts different valies in tje igdra-chain intaracgiov regiuns $u<u_\theta$, $j=u_\thrta$, and $u>u_\theta$.

In tha ens, we would like to pjint out that fow ASAWs model, in the space of ijterartion 'arameyerf, the arrangement of possible lhases is apiroximately tre sqme, as in thz case of the surface-interacting polymer chain
be found in one of the three (extended, or globule whereas a solitary Depending the values of inter-chain interaction parameters in the case of ASAWs model, $w$ and $t$ in the case of CSAWs model), the system can be in the segregated phase, when the chains can be considered as almost independent, in in the of contacts between the chains is comparable with their length (entangled phases). For both models, there a critical line in the plane of the parameters ($v_c(u)$ for ASAWs, $w_c(u,t)$, with fixed $t$, for model), divides it areas to and entangled phases. the case of the ASAWs model, for $v\geq v_c(u)$, the average number $\langle M\rangle$ of contacts between two polymers the average $\langle of 3D chain as \sim {\langle N_3\rangle}^\phi$. Different values of $\phi$ correspond to $v=v_c(u)$ and $v>v_c(u)$, and, in $\phi$ also on the strength of the intra-chain parameter $u$. However, in all entangled phases large of the 3D chain remain in the bulk, beyond the scope of the inter-chain interaction, prohibition of crossings between chains hinders their entanglement, for large of $v$. the contrary, in CSAWs model for $w>w_c(u,t)$ the two chains are entangled, while they only partially cover each other at the $w=w_c(u,t)$, the scaling relation M\rangle \sim {\langle N_3\rangle}^\varphi$ satisfied, where $\varphi$ takes different the interaction and In end, we would like point out that for ASAWs in the space of possible phases is approximately the same, as in case of the surface-interacting polymer chain
 be found in one of the three posSible phaseS (exteNdeD, $\thEtA$-phaSe, or Globule phase), whEReas A solitary 2D chain is alwayS exteNdED. DepENdIng on The valuES oF THe iNtEr-ChaIn INtEractIon ParametErs ($v$ in the cAse Of aSAWs model, anD $W$ aNd $t$ in the caSe oF CSAWs model), tHe sYstem cAn Be eITher iN thE segrEgated PHase, whEn the chaiNs CAn be coNSidered AS AlMost Independent, or in phASeS In which the numbEr of coNtACtS BEtwEen The chains iS cOmparABle with THeIR LEngTH (entangled phaSes). For both mODelS, there Is A crITical lIne in ThE PlaNe of the inteRactIon parameTers ($v_c(U)$ For ASAWS, And, $w_c(u,t)$, With fiXed $T$, foR CSAwS mOdEl), wHiCH diVIdEs iT IntO areas coRrEsPondiNg to SEGREgatEd aNd enTanglEd phases. In the CasE of tHE ASaWs moDel, foR $v\geQ v_C(u)$, the AveragE numbEr $\Langle M\rangle$ of ContActs betweEn tHe Two PoLymerS Scales WitH thE averagE length $\LAngLe n_3\RANgLe$ of the 3D chain as $\lanGlE m\RaNgle \sim
{\lAngle N_3\RAnGlE}^\Phi$. DiffeReNt vAlueS OF the cOntaCT eXponent $\pHi$ corrESpOnD to $v=v_c(u)$ AnD $v>v_c(u)$, aNd, In aDdiTion, $\pHI$ alsO depenDs on the sTrengTH of the intra-chaIN interaction pARaMETeR $U$. HowEveR, in all entanGled PHaseS larGE pArtS Of the 3d chaiN rEMaIN in the bulk, beyond the ScOpe of tHe intEr-chain interaCtion, since THE ProhibitIon oF CrOSsings between tWo chaIns hinders THeir compLete eNtanglemEnt, even foR EXtremely LarGe vAluEs oF $V$. on The contrary, in csaWs mOdEl for $w>w_C(u,t)$ The two cHaiNs aRe cOmpLeTely entanGled, whilE tHeY oNlY paRtialLY cover eaCh OthEr At tHe criTIcal liNe $w=w_c(U,t)$, whErE tHE scAling reLAtION $\lanGlE M\RangLe \sIm {\LanglE
N_3\raNGle}^\Varphi$ iS satisfieD, anD WherE $\vArPhi$ takeS different valUeS in the intrA-cHaiN interACTion regiOns $u<u_\theta$, $u=u_\theta$, and $u>u_\tHEta$.

In thE enD, we woUld lIke to poinT ouT that fOr AsaWs modEl, in thE spacE oF inTERactiON PaRamEtErs, the arraNGEmeNt of pOsSiblE phases Is approximately the SAme, As in the case of The SurfACE-iNteRAcTIng PoLYmeR CHain
 be found in one of the th ree possib le ph ase s ( ex tend ed,$\theta$-phase ,  orglobule phase), wherea s a s ol i tary 2D  chai n is al w ay s ext en de d.De p en dingonthe val ues of the  in te r-chain inte r ac tion param ete rs ($v$ in t hecase o fASA W s mod el,  and$w$ an d  $t$ i n the cas eo f CSAW s  model) , th e sy stem can be eithe r  i n  the segregate d phas e, wh e n  th e c hains canbe  cons i dered a s  a l m o sti ndependent, o r in phases inwhichth e n u mber o f con ta c tsbetween the  cha ins is co mparab l e witht heir le ngth ( ent ang ledp ha se s).  F o r b o th  mo d els , thereis  a  crit ical l i n e in  th e pl ane o f the interac tio n pa r ame ters($v_c (u)$  f or AS AWs, a nd, $ w_ c(u,t)$, with f ixed  $t$, for  CS AW s m od el),w hich d ivi des  it int o areas cor re s p o nd ing to segregatedan d en tangledphases .  I nt he caseof  th e AS A W s mod el,f or  $v\geqv_c(u) $ ,th e avera ge  numbe r$\l ang le M\ r angl e$ ofcontacts  betw e en the two pol y mers scales w i th t he aver age  length $\l angl e  N_3 \ran g le $ o f  the3D ch ai n  a s  $\langle M\rangle\s im
{\l angle  N_3\rangle}^ \phi$. Dif f e r ent valu es o f  t h e contact expo nent$\phi$ cor r espond t o $v= v_c(u)$and $v>v_ c ( u)$, and , i n a ddi tio n ,  $ \phi$ also de p e ndson  the st ren gth ofthe  in tra -ch ai n interac tion par am et er  $ u$.  Howe v er, in a ll  en ta ngl ed ph a ses la rge p arts  o ft he3D chai n  r e m ainin  t he b ulk ,beyon d th e  sc ope ofthe inter -ch a in i nt er action,  since the pr oh ibition of  c ros singsb e tween tw o chains hinders theirc omplete  en tangl emen t, even f orextrem ely largevalues  of $ v$ . O n the c o n tr ary ,in CSAWs m o d elfor $ w> w_c( u,t)$ t he two chains arec omp letely entang led , wh i l ethe y  o n lypa r tia l l y cover each ot her at the  c r it ical line$ w=w _c (u,t)$,  wherethe s c aling r elation $ \langle M \r angl e \si m {\langle 
N_3\ran gle}^\var p hi$ i s  s atisf ied , andwh ere  $\va rphi$t ake s dif ferent  v aluesin th eintra-ch ain interaction regions  $u<u_ \thet a$,  $u=u_\th eta $ , a nd $u>u_\ thet a$.

In th e e nd,  we w oul d  like  top oi nto ut th at f o r ASAWs m o de l,i n  t he space of i n ter actio n p a ramete rs,the arrangement o f  possible phas es i s app rox i mate ly  the same, asinth e case ofth e surface-i nteracti ng polym er cha in
 be_found in_one of the three_possible phases_(extended,_$\theta$-phase, or_globule_phase), whereas a_solitary 2D chain_is always extended. Depending_on the values_of_the inter-chain interaction parameters ($v$ in the case of ASAWs model, and $w$ and_$t$_in the_case_of_CSAWs model), the system can_be either in the segregated_phase, when_the chains can be considered as almost independent,_or_in phases in_which the number of contacts between the chains is_comparable with their length (entangled phases)._For both models,_there_is_a critical line in_the plane of the interaction parameters_($v_c(u)$ for ASAWs, and, $w_c(u,t)$, with_fixed $t$, for CSAWs model), which divides_it into areas corresponding to segregated_and entangled phases. In the_case of_the ASAWs model, for $v\geq_v_c(u)$, the average_number $\langle_M\rangle$ of contacts_between the two polymers scales with_the average length_$\langle N_3\rangle$ of the 3D chain_as_$\langle M\rangle \sim
{\langle_N_3\rangle}^\phi$._Different_values of_the contact exponent_$\phi$_correspond to_$v=v_c(u)$_and $v>v_c(u)$, and, in addition, $\phi$_also_depends on the strength of the intra-chain_interaction parameter $u$. However,_in_all entangled phases large_parts of the 3D chain_remain in the bulk, beyond the_scope of_the inter-chain_interaction, since the prohibition of crossings between two chains hinders their_complete entanglement, even for extremely large_values of $v$. On_the contrary,_in_CSAWs model for_$w>w_c(u,t)$_the two_chains are completely entangled, while they only_partially cover_each other at the critical line_$w=w_c(u,t)$, where the scaling_relation_$\langle M\rangle \sim {\langle
N_3\rangle}^\varphi$ is satisfied,_and where $\varphi$ takes different values_in the intra-chain interaction regions_$u<u_\theta$,_$u=u_\theta$,_and $u>u_\theta$.

In the end, we_would like to point out that_for ASAWs model,_in the space of interaction parameters, the_arrangement_of possible phases is approximately the_same,_as in the case of the_surface-interacting_polymer_chain