$-ray]{} while the presence of unassociated hits or tracks are a strong indicator of background. These as well as other considerations are used for training background rejection CTs.

The final discriminator of background is the identification of an electromagnetic shower. Considerations such as how well the tracker solution points to the calorimeter centroid, how well the directional information from the calorimeter matches that of the track found in the tracker, as well as the width and longitudinal shower profile in the various layers of the calorimeter, are important in discrimination of backgrounds. Again the information from the reconstruction is used to train CTs and the resulting probability is used to eliminate backgrounds.

The broad range of LAT observations and analysis, from GRBs to extended diffuse radiation, leads to different optimizations of the event selections and different rates of residual backgrounds. For example, in analysis of a GRB, the relatively small region of the sky as well as the very short time window allow the background rejection cuts to be relaxed relative to an analysis of a diffuse source covering a large portion of the sky. Furthermore a key science attribute for GRB observations is the time evolution and the sensitivity of a measurement to rapid time variation scales as the square root of the number of detected burst photons. The background rejection analysis has been constructed to allow analysis classes to be optimized for specific science topics.

Table \[t2.5\] lists 3 analysis classes that have been defined based on the backgrounds expected in orbit, current knowledge of the [$\gamma$-ray]{} sky, and the performance of the LAT. Our estimates of LAT performance are given in terms of these analysis classes. Common to all of these analysis classes is the rejection of the charged-particle backgrounds entering within the field of view. The classes are differentiated by an increasingly tighter requirement that the candidate photon events in both the tracker and the calorimeter behave as expected for [$\gamma$-ray]{} induced electromagnetic showers. The loosest cuts apply to the Transient class, for which the background rejection was set to allow a background rate of $<$2 Hz, estimated using the background model described in §\[s2.4.3.1\], which would result in no more than one background event every 5 sec inside a $10^\circ$ radius about a source. The Source class was designed so that the residual background contamination was similar to that expected from the extragalactic [$\gamma$-ray]{} background flux over the entire field of view. Finally, the Diffuse class has the best background rejection and was designed such that hars
$ -ray ] { } while the presence of unassociated hits or tracks are a strong index of setting. These as well as other consideration are use for training background rejection computerized tomography. 

 The concluding discriminator of background is the identification of an electromagnetic shower. Considerations such as how well the tracker solution point to the calorimeter centroid, how well the directional information from the calorimeter match that of the track found in the tracker, as well as the width and longitudinal shower profile in the various layer of the calorimeter, are important in discrimination of backgrounds. Again the information from the reconstruction is use to train CTs and the resulting probability is used to extinguish backgrounds. 

 The broad range of LAT observations and analysis, from GRBs to gallop diffuse radiation, leads to different optimizations of the consequence choice and different rates of residual backgrounds. For example, in analysis of a GRB, the relatively small region of the sky as well as the very short clock time window allow the backdrop rejection cut to be relaxed relative to an analysis of a diffuse source covering a large portion of the sky. Furthermore a key science property for GRB observations is the time evolution and the sensitivity of a measurement to rapid time variation scales as the square root of the number of detected burst photons. The setting rejection analysis has been construct to allow analysis classes to be optimized for specific science subject. 

 Table   \[t2.5\ ] lists 3 analysis classes that have been define based on the backgrounds expected in orbit, current cognition of the [ $ \gamma$-ray ] { } sky, and the performance of the LAT. Our estimates of LAT performance are given in terms of these psychoanalysis classes. Common to all of these analysis classes is the rejection of the charge - particle backdrop entering within the field of view. The classes are differentiated by an increasingly close requirement that the candidate photon events in both the tracker and the calorimeter behave as expected for [ $ \gamma$-ray ] { } induced electromagnetic showers. The loosest cuts use to the Transient class, for which the background rejection was put to allow a background rate of $ < $ 2 Hz, estimated using the background mannequin described in § \[s2.4.3.1\ ], which would result in no more than one background event every 5 sec inside a $ 10^\circ$ radius about a source. The Source course was designed so that the residual background contaminant was exchangeable to that expected from the extragalactic [ $ \gamma$-ray ] { } background flux over the entire battlefield of view. Finally, the Diffuse class give birth the best background rejection and was designed such that hars
$-ray]{} while the presence of ukassociated hits or trarks are a strone indicator of background. Thxse qs weol as other consideratkons are lsed for rraiiing background csjectiok CTs.

Fme fiuao discriminatot of backgrognd is the idettkfncation of an electromagnetic shower. Considrrwtions such as how rell nht tracker solution points to the dalorimtter centroid, how eell the directional inforlatiln from the calorileter matchga trqt of the trxck found pu the trackgr, as well as the width and longktudiual shower kxifipg in the varmous lwyers of the calorimater, arr important in divcrumination of backgrouids. Again the informwtion frok che reconstruction is uwed tm trdin ZRs xnd tie desultlng probabilify is used ro eliminate backgrpuges.

The broad rznge os JAT observations and analysis, from GRBs to extended diffuse radiarion, leads to differejt optimisations of the event selections and different ratas of fesneual cqcngrounds. For example, in analysis of a GRB, the dekanively small regijn of the sly ax well as the xery skkrf time window alloa the bwckgriund rejestiom cuts to be relaxed relatice to an anajtsis of a diffuse dource covexing a largr portion of the sky. Fuxthermkre a key sfience atffibute for GRB ocsegvathons is ufe time evolution and the wensntivity uf a measuwement to gapid time variation scapes ad dhe square root of the number of detected burst photons. Tve tackgrouud rejcction analysis has been consjructed tj alluw analysia classxs to be optymized for spafific sciencx topics.

Twble \[r2.5\] liwts 3 anxuysis classes yhat have been defibed based on the beckgtohnds expected iu irbit, current kmowuedde oh the [$\camma$-ray]{} sky, and thd perfurmance of bhe LAT. Our estimates of LAD pedformance are givem ln terms if these analysis claxses. Common to all of tiese aialysix cjasses is the rejection of the charged-pwrtlcle backgrougds cnteting within the field of view. The classes are diffxrentiated by an increawingly tighter requnrtment that thx candydate phodon events in both tye tracker and tht calorimeter behave as expecded flr [$\gamma$-ray]{} induced electromagnetic showers. The loosest cuts apply to the Transmegt class, fod whoch tve yackgrotnd ceoection was set tp allow a background rate of $<$2 Hv, estimateg bsing the background model dexcfibed in §\[s2.4.3.1\], whkch would result in no mkre than one background event every 5 sev inside a $10^\circ$ radius anout a soyrce. Fhe Soltce class was designec so tkat thw residyal nackground congamonwtion was simmlax to that expected from the extratalactuc [$\gamma$-ray]{} backgrmund flux oyev the gntire fyeld of view. Finzlly, hhe Dkffuse class nas the best bsckground rejection dnq was designed auch that hats
$-ray]{} while the presence of unassociated hits are strong indicator background. These as used training background rejection The final discriminator background is the identification of an shower. Considerations such as how well the tracker solution points to the calorimeter how well the directional information from the calorimeter matches that of the track in tracker, well the width and longitudinal shower profile in the various layers of the calorimeter, are important in of backgrounds. Again the information from the reconstruction used to train CTs the resulting probability is used eliminate The broad of observations analysis, from GRBs extended diffuse radiation, leads to different optimizations of the event selections and different rates of residual backgrounds. example, in a GRB, relatively region the sky as the very short time window allow cuts to be relaxed relative to an analysis a diffuse covering a large portion of the Furthermore a key science attribute for GRB observations the time evolution and the sensitivity of a measurement to rapid time variation scales as root of the number detected burst photons. background analysis been to allow classes to be optimized for specific science topics. Table \[t2.5\] lists analysis classes that have been defined based on the backgrounds orbit, knowledge of the sky, and the performance the Our estimates of LAT given terms classes. to of these analysis classes the rejection of the charged-particle entering within the field differentiated by an increasingly tighter requirement that the photon events in both the tracker and calorimeter behave as expected for [$\gamma$-ray]{} induced electromagnetic showers. The loosest cuts to the for which the background rejection was set to a background rate of Hz, estimated using the background model described in §\[s2.4.3.1\], would in no than one background every 5 sec a $10^\circ$ radius source. The class designed residual background contamination was similar to expected the extragalactic [$\gamma$-ray]{} background flux the of view. Finally, the Diffuse class has the best background rejection and was designed such
$-ray]{} while the presence of unasSociated hiTs or tRacKs aRe A strOng iNdicator of backGRounD. These as well as other conSiderAtIOns aRE uSed foR trainiNG bACKgrOuNd RejEcTIoN CTs.

THe fInal disCriminator Of bAcKground is the IDeNtificatioN of An electromagNetIc showEr. conSIderaTioNs sucH as how WEll the Tracker soLuTIon poiNTs to the CALoRimeTer centroid, how welL ThE Directional infOrmatiOn FRoM THe cAloRimeter matChEs thaT Of the trACk FOUNd iN The tracker, as wEll as the widTH anD longiTuDinAL showeR profIlE In tHe various laYers Of the caloRimeteR, Are impoRTant in dIscrimInaTioN of bACkGrOunDs. aGaiN ThE inFOrmAtion froM tHe ReconStruCTION is uSed To trAin CTS and the resultIng ProbABilIty is Used tO eliMiNate bAckgroUnds.

THe Broad range of LAT ObseRvations aNd aNaLysIs, From Grbs to exTenDed Diffuse RadiatiON, leAdS TO DiFferent optimizatioNs OF ThE event seLectioNS aNd DIfferent RaTes Of reSIDual bAckgROuNds. For exAmple, iN AnAlYsis of a gRb, the reLaTivEly Small REgioN of the Sky as welL as thE Very short time wINdow allow the bACkGROuND rejEctIon cuts to be RelaXEd reLatiVE tO an ANalysIs of a DiFFuSE source covering a larGe PortioN of thE sky. FurthermoRe a key scieNCE AttributE for grB OBservations is tHe timE evolution ANd the senSitivIty of a meAsurement TO Rapid timE vaRiaTioN scALEs As the square roOT Of thE nUmber of DetEcted buRst PhoTonS. ThE bAckground RejectioN aNaLySiS haS been COnstructEd To aLlOw aNalysIS classEs to bE optImIzED foR specifIC sCIEnce ToPiCs.

TaBle \[T2.5\] lIsts 3 aNalySIs cLasses tHat have beEn dEFineD bAsEd on the Backgrounds exPeCted in orbiT, cUrrEnt knoWLEdge of thE [$\gamma$-ray]{} sky, and the perfoRMance of The lAT. OuR estImates of LaT pErformAncE Are givEn in teRms of ThEse ANAlysiS CLaSseS. COmmon to all OF TheSe anaLySis cLasses iS the rejection of the CHarGed-particle baCkgRounDS EnTerINg WIthIn THe fIELd of view. The clasSes are diffErENtIated by an iNCreAsIngly tiGhter reQuireMEnt that The candidAte photon EvEnts IN BotH the trackeR and the cAlorimeteR BehavE As ExpecTed For [$\gamMa$-Ray]{} InducEd elecTRomAgnetIc showErS. The loOsest CuTs apply tO the Transient class, for whIch the BackgRouNd rejectiOn wAS seT to allow a BackGround rate Of $<$2 HZ, esTimatEd uSIng thE bacKGrOunD Model DescRIbed in §\[s2.4.3.1\], whICh WouLD ReSult in no morE THAn oNe bacKgrOUnd eveNt evEry 5 sec inside a $10^\circ$ RAdius about a souRce. THE souRce CLass WaS designed so thaT thE rESIdual bacKgRound contamInation wAs SImilaR to thaT expecTed from THE eXTragalActiC [$\gaMma$-ray]{} bacKgrOuND flux ovEr ThE Entire FielD oF view. FInally, THe DiFFUse class has the beSt bacKGRound REjeCtion AnD was desIGned Such that haRs
$-ray]{} while the presenc e of unass ociat edhit sor t rack s are a strong indi cator of background. T heseas well as  othe r consi d er a t ion sar e u se d  f or tr ain ing bac kground re jec ti on CTs.

The fi nal discri min ator of back gro und is  t hei denti fic ation  of an electr omagnetic  s h ower.C onsider a t io ns s uch as how well t h et racker solutio n poin ts to t hecal orimeter c en troid ,  how we l lt h e  di r ectional info rmation fro m  th e calo ri met e r matc hes t ha t  of  the trackfoun d in thetracke r , as we l l as th e widt h a ndlong i tu di nal  s h owe r  p rof i lein the v ar io us la yers o f thecal orim eter,  are importan t i n di s cri minat ion o f ba ck groun ds. Ag ain t he  information fr om t he recons tru ct ion  i s use d  to tr ain  CT s and t he resu l tin gp r o ba bility is used toel i m in ate back ground s .
T h e broadra nge  ofL A T obs erva t io ns and a nalysi s ,fr om GRBs  t o exte nd eddif fuser adia tion,leads to  diff e rent optimizat i ons of the ev e nt s el e ctio nsand differe nt r a tesof r e si dua l  back groun ds .  F o r example, in analy si s of a  GRB,  the relative ly small r e g i on of th e sk y  a s  well as the v ery s hort timew indow al low t he backg round rej e c tion cut s t o b e r ela x e drelative to a n anal ys is of a  di ffuse s our cecov eri ng  a largeportionof  t he  s ky.  Furt h ermore a  k eysc ien ce at t ribute  forGRBob se r vat ions is th e time  e vo luti onan d the  sen s iti vity of  a measur eme n t to  r ap id time  variation sc al es as thesq uar e root o f the nu mber of detected burstp hotons.  Th e bac kgro und rejec tio n anal ysi s  has b een co nstru ct edt o  allo w an aly si s classest o  be  opti mi zedfor spe cific science topi c s.
Table \[t2.5 \]list s 3ana l ys i s c la s ses t hat have been d efined bas ed on  the backg r oun ds  expect ed in o rbit, current  knowledg e of the[$ \gam m a $-r ay]{} sky,  and the  performa n ce of th e LAT . O ur est im ate s ofLAT pe r for mance  are g iv en interms  o f theseanalysis classes. Commo n to a ll of  th ese analy sis cla sses is t he r ejection o f t hecharg ed- p artic le b a ck gro u nds e nter i ng within th e f i e ld  of view. T h e cla ssesare differ enti ated by an increa s ingly tighterrequ i r eme ntt hatth e candidate ph oto ne v ents inbo th the trac ker andth e  calo rimete r beha ve as e x p ec t ed for  [$\ gam ma$-ray]{ } i nd u ced ele ct ro m agneti c sh ow ers. T he loo s estc u ts apply to theTrans i e nt cl a ss,  forwh ich the back ground rej ection wasset to  all ow abackgro un d rate  of  $ <$2 Hz, es t imated us ing t he back gr ound  mo del de scri b e d in§\[s 2. 4.3 .1\], whi c h  w o ul dr esu lt i n nomo re t han one b a ckground  ev e nt ever y5 s e c  insid e  a $ 10^\circ$rad ius a b o ut a sourc e . Th e  S o urceclasswas de signeds o t ha t the r esi d u al backgr ound cont a min at ionwas simi la r to  t hat  e xpected from th e extrag alactic[ $ \gamma $-r a y]{} backgr ou nd flux over  theen t ire fie l d  of  view.F ina lly , t he D iff usec lass has the best backgr ound  reje c tio n and  wasde signed s u ch t hat hars 
$-ray]{} while_the presence_of unassociated hits or_tracks are_a_strong indicator_of_background. These as_well as other_considerations are used for_training background rejection_CTs.

The_final discriminator of background is the identification of an electromagnetic shower. Considerations such as_how_well the_tracker_solution_points to the calorimeter centroid,_how well the directional information_from the_calorimeter matches that of the track found in_the_tracker, as well_as the width and longitudinal shower profile in the_various layers of the calorimeter, are_important in discrimination_of_backgrounds._Again the information from_the reconstruction is used to train_CTs and the resulting probability is_used to eliminate backgrounds.

The broad range of_LAT observations and analysis, from GRBs_to extended diffuse radiation, leads_to different_optimizations of the event selections_and different rates_of residual_backgrounds. For example,_in analysis of a GRB, the_relatively small region_of the sky as well as_the_very short time_window_allow_the background_rejection cuts to_be_relaxed relative_to_an analysis of a diffuse source_covering_a large portion of the sky. Furthermore_a key science attribute_for_GRB observations is the_time evolution and the sensitivity_of a measurement to rapid time_variation scales_as the_square root of the number of detected burst photons. The background_rejection analysis has been constructed to_allow analysis classes to_be optimized_for_specific science topics.

Table \[t2.5\]_lists_3 analysis_classes that have been defined based on_the backgrounds_expected in orbit, current knowledge of_the [$\gamma$-ray]{} sky, and_the_performance of the LAT. Our estimates_of LAT performance are given in_terms of these analysis classes._Common_to_all of these analysis classes_is the rejection of the charged-particle_backgrounds entering within_the field of view. The classes are_differentiated_by an increasingly tighter requirement that_the_candidate photon events in both the_tracker_and_the calorimeter behave as expected_for [$\gamma$-ray]{} induced electromagnetic showers. The_loosest cuts apply to the Transient class, for which_the background rejection_was set to allow a_background_rate_of $<$2 Hz, estimated using the background model described in_§\[s2.4.3.1\], which_would result in_no more than one background event every 5 sec inside_a $10^\circ$ radius about a source. The_Source class was designed so that the residual background contamination was_similar to that expected from the extragalactic [$\gamma$-ray]{}_background flux over the entire field of_view. Finally, the Diffuse_class_has the best background rejection and was_designed_such_that_hars