 with a *flexible* atomic basis set, like in the LMTO method.[@LMTO] Then, the change of $F^0$ caused by relaxation of the $3d$ orbitals can be easily evaluated as[@PRB94.2] $$\Delta^{(2)} F^0=\frac{n_{3d}}{2} \frac{\partial F^0}{\partial n_{3d}}.$$ Since $n_{3d}$ is large in the fcc Ni, this contribution is also large. The situation can be different in the GW scheme, based on the perturbation theory expansion, which requires a large basis set.[@HybertsenLouie] For example, in order to describe properly the same relaxation of the $3d$ wavefunctions, the polarization $P_{\rm GW}$ should explicitly include the excitation from the occupied $3d$ to the unoccupied $4d$ (and probably higher) states.[@FerdiGunnarsson]

\[sec:q\][**q**]{}-dependence of Coulomb $U$
--------------------------------------------

Since the change of the number of $3d$ electrons in transition metals is totally screened by the $4sp$ electrons at the same atomic site,[@AnisimovGunnarsson] it is reasonable to expect an appreciable ${\bf q}$-dependence of the effective $U$. Results of CLDA calculations for the high-symmetry points of the Brillouin zone are summarized in Table \[tab:Uq\]. The effective $U$ appears to be small in the $\Gamma$-point due to the perfect screening by the $4sp$ electrons. At the Brillouin zone boundary this channel of screening is strongly suppressed that is reflected in the larger values of the Coulomb $U$. The screening by intersite Coulomb interactions, which takes place in the ${\rm X}$-point of the BZ, is substantially weaker and cannot fully compensate the lack of the $4sp$-screening. In the ${\rm L}$-point of the BZ for the fcc lattice, the modulation of the $3d$-electron density in the CLDA calculations is such that the number of nearest neighbors with excessive and deficient number of $3d$ electrons is the same. Therefore, the contributions of intersite Coulomb interactions to the screening are cancelled out, resulting in the largest value of the effective $U$ in this point of the BZ.

   $\Gamma$   ${\rm X}$   ${\rm L}$
  
with a * flexible * atomic basis set, like in the LMTO method.[@LMTO ] Then, the variety of $ F^0 $ cause by relaxation of the $ 3d$ orbitals can be easily measure as[@PRB94.2 ] $ $ \Delta^{(2) } F^0=\frac{n_{3d}}{2 } \frac{\partial F^0}{\partial n_{3d}}.$$ Since $ n_{3d}$ is big in the fcc Ni, this contribution is also large. The position can be unlike in the GW scheme, based on the perturbation theory expansion, which requires a big basis set.[@HybertsenLouie ] For example, in decree to describe properly the same relaxation of the $ 3d$ wavefunctions, the polarization $ P_{\rm GW}$ should explicitly include the excitation from the busy $ 3d$ to the unoccupied $ 4d$ (and probably higher) states.[@FerdiGunnarsson ] 

 \[sec: q\][**q**]{}-dependence of Coulomb $ U$ 
 -------------------------------------------- 

 Since the change of the issue of $ 3d$ electrons in transition metals is totally screen by the $ 4sp$ electrons at the same atomic site,[@AnisimovGunnarsson ] it is reasonable to expect an appreciable $ { \bf q}$-dependence of the effective $ U$. Results of CLDA calculation for the high - symmetry points of the Brillouin zone are summarized in Table   \[tab: Uq\ ]. The effective $ U$ appears to be small in the $ \Gamma$-point due to the perfect screening by the $ 4sp$ electrons. At the Brillouin zone boundary this channel of screening is strongly suppressed that is reflected in the larger values of the Coulomb $ U$. The cover by intersite Coulomb interaction, which takes space in the $ { \rm X}$-point of the BZ, is well weak and cannot fully compensate the lack of the $ 4sp$-screening. In the $ { \rm L}$-point of the BZ for the fcc lattice, the transition of the $ 3d$-electron density in the CLDA calculations is such that the number of nearest neighbor with excessive and deficient number of $ 3d$ electrons is the same. Therefore, the contributions of intersite Coulomb interaction to the screening are cancelled out, resulting in the largest value of the effective $ U$ in this distributor point of the BZ. 

    $ \Gamma$    $ { \rm X}$    $ { \rm L}$
 wihh a *flexible* atomic basls set, like in tkw LMTO methos.[@LMTO] Thdn, the change of $F^0$ caused by rwlaxaupon of the $3d$ orbitals can be ewsily evqluaued as[@PRB94.2] $$\Delta^{(2)} F^0=\hdac{n_{3d}}{2} \fvcc{\parflal F^0}{\'actial n_{3d}}.$$ Since $k_{3d}$ is large in the fcc Ni, tfid contribution is also large. The sieuation cwn be differenj in uhe GW abhtme, based on the perturbation thekry expension, which reauires a large basis set.[@HyhertdenLouie] For examppe, in order to qwscribe propdrly the same relaxatikn of the $3d$ wavefunctions, the pularivation $P_{\rm TW}$ shlold explicitoy inblude the exclnation xrom thr occupied $3d$ tp tie uboccupied $4d$ (and probauly higher) states.[@FerqiGunnarsvou]

\[sec:q\][**q**]{}-dependence of Ciuoomb $O$
--------------------------------------------

Sinca thd chxngt oh tge numher of $3d$ elecfrons in trqnsition metals is uotwoly screened gy the $4s[$ electrons at the same atomic site,[@AnispmovFunnarsson] it is reasonqble to expect an appteciable ${\bs q}$-dependence of the effective $U$. Results of CLDA walcumxtiinf dog the high-symmetry points of the Brillouin zogs srv summarized in Tcble \[tab:Uq\]. The efgeftode $U$ appears jo be smalm in the $\Gamma$-poinh due tj the perfect fcrerning by the $4sp$ electrons. Ar the Brillolin zone boundary this channel of scrgening is strongly suppressed thaf is refleched in ths larger values ow tme Woulomb $U$. The screening by intersitx Coukomb ingeravtions, which takfs place in the ${\rm X}$-poinh of jhe BZ, is substajtially weaker and cannot fully compensate thg ldck of the $4fp$-scrcening. In the ${\ri L}$-point of thg BZ for che fcz lattice, nhe moduletion of the $3d$-electron detdity in the RLDA calctlatuons is sucf that the numbrr of neageft nwighbors with excexsixs and deficient nunber of $3d$ electtonr if nhe swke. Therefore, the covyribugions of inberrite Coulomb interactionv to the screening are cwncelled out, restlting in the largest value of uhe efhectivx $U$ in thys point of the BZ.

   $\Gamma$   ${\rj X}$   ${\rm P}$
  
with a *flexible* atomic basis set, like LMTO Then, the of $F^0$ caused orbitals be easily evaluated $$\Delta^{(2)} F^0=\frac{n_{3d}}{2} \frac{\partial n_{3d}}.$$ Since $n_{3d}$ is large in fcc Ni, this contribution is also large. The situation can be different in GW scheme, based on the perturbation theory expansion, which requires a large basis For in to properly the same relaxation of the $3d$ wavefunctions, the polarization $P_{\rm GW}$ should explicitly include the from the occupied $3d$ to the unoccupied $4d$ probably higher) states.[@FerdiGunnarsson] \[sec:q\][**q**]{}-dependence Coulomb $U$ -------------------------------------------- Since the of number of electrons transition is totally screened the $4sp$ electrons at the same atomic site,[@AnisimovGunnarsson] it is reasonable to expect an appreciable ${\bf q}$-dependence the effective of CLDA for high-symmetry of the Brillouin summarized in Table \[tab:Uq\]. The effective be small in the $\Gamma$-point due to the screening by $4sp$ electrons. At the Brillouin zone this channel of screening is strongly suppressed that reflected in the larger values of the Coulomb $U$. The screening by intersite Coulomb interactions, place in the ${\rm of the BZ, substantially and fully the lack the $4sp$-screening. In the ${\rm L}$-point of the BZ for the lattice, the modulation of the $3d$-electron density in the CLDA such the number of neighbors with excessive and number $3d$ electrons is the the of to screening cancelled out, resulting in largest value of the effective in this point of ${\rm L}$
 with a *flexible* atomic basis sEt, like in thE LMTO MetHod.[@lMtO] ThEn, thE change of $F^0$ causED by rElaxation of the $3d$ orbitalS can bE eASily EVaLuateD as[@PRB94.2] $$\DELtA^{(2)} f^0=\FraC{n_{3D}}{2} \fRac{\PaRTiAl F^0}{\paRtiAl n_{3d}}.$$ SinCe $n_{3d}$ is largE in ThE fcc Ni, this coNTrIbution is aLso Large. The situAtiOn can bE dIffERent iN thE GW scHeme, baSEd on thE perturbaTiON theorY ExpansiON, WhIch rEquires a large basiS SeT.[@hybertsenLouie] for exaMpLE, iN ORdeR to Describe prOpErly tHE same reLAxATIOn oF The $3d$ wavefunctIons, the polaRIzaTion $P_{\rM Gw}$ shOUld expLicitLy INclUde the excitAtioN from the oCcupieD $3D$ to the uNOccupieD $4d$ (and pRobAblY higHEr) StAteS.[@FERdigUnNarSSon]

\[Sec:q\][**q**]{}-depEnDeNce of coulOMB $u$
--------------------------------------------

sincE thE chaNge of The number of $3d$ eLecTronS In tRansiTion mEtalS iS totaLly scrEened By The $4sp$ electrons aT the Same atomiC siTe,[@aniSiMovGuNNarssoN] it Is rEasonabLe to expECt aN aPPREcIable ${\bf q}$-dependence Of THE eFfective $u$. ResulTS oF CldA calculAtIonS for THE high-SymmETrY points oF the BrILlOuIn zone aRe SummarIzEd iN TaBle \[taB:uq\]. ThE effecTive $U$ appEars tO Be small in the $\GaMMa$-point due to tHE pERFeCT scrEenIng by the $4sp$ eLectROns. AT the bRiLloUIn zonE bounDaRY tHIs channel of screeninG iS stronGly suPpressed that iS reflected IN THe larger ValuES oF The Coulomb $U$. The ScreeNing by inteRSite CoulOmb inTeractioNs, which taKES place in The ${\Rm X}$-PoiNt oF THe bZ, is substantiALLy weAkEr and caNnoT fully cOmpEnsAte The LaCk of the $4sp$-ScreeninG. IN tHe ${\Rm l}$-poInt of THe BZ for tHe Fcc LaTtiCe, the MOdulatIon of The $3d$-ElEcTRon Density IN tHE cLDA CaLcUlatIonS iS such That THe nUmber of Nearest neIghBOrs wItH eXcessivE and deficient NuMber of $3d$ eleCtRonS is the SAMe. TherefOre, the contributions of inTErsite COulOmb inTeraCtions to tHe sCreeniNg aRE canceLled ouT, resuLtIng IN The laRGEsT vaLuE of the effeCTIve $u$ in thIs PoinT of the Bz.

   $\Gamma$   ${\rm X}$   ${\rm L}$
  
 with a *flexible* atomicbasis set,  like  in  th eLMTO  met hod.[@LMTO] Th e n, t he change of $F^0$ cau sed b yr elax a ti on of  the $3 d $o r bit al scan  b e  e asily  ev aluated  as[@PRB94 .2]  $ $\Delta^{(2) }  F ^0=\frac{n _{3 d}}{2} \frac {\p artial  F ^0} { \part ial  n_{3 d}}.$$ Since$n_{3d}$is largei n the f c c  N i, t his contributioni sa lso large. The  situa ti o nc a n b e d ifferent i nthe G W  scheme ,  b a s e d o n  the perturba tion theory exp ansion ,whi c h requ iresal arg e basis set .[@H ybertsenL ouie]F or exam p le, inordertodes crib e  p ro per ly the sa mer ela xation o fth e $3d $ wa v e f u ncti ons , th e pol arization $P_ {\r m GW } $ s hould  expl icit ly  incl ude th e exc it ation from theoccu pied $3d$  to  t heun occup i ed $4d $ ( and  probab ly high e r)st a t e s. [@FerdiGunnarsson] 
\ [ se c:q\][** q**]{} - de pe n dence of  C oul omb$ U $
--- ---- - -- -------- ------ - -- -- ------- -- ------ 
Sin cethe c h ange  of th e number  of $ 3 d$ electrons i n  transition m e ta l s  i s  tot all y screenedby t h e $4 sp$e le ctr o ns at  thesa m ea tomic site,[@Anisim ov Gunnar sson]  it is reason able to ex p e c t an app reci a bl e  ${\bf q}$-dep enden ce of thee ffective  $U$.  Results  of CLDAc a lculatio nsfor  th e h i g h- symmetry poin t s  ofth e Brill oui n zoneare  su mma riz ed  in Table  \[tab:U q\ ].  T he  ef fecti v e $U$ ap pe ars  t o b e sma l l in t he $\ Gamm a$ -p o int  due to th e perf ec tscre eni ng  by t he $ 4 sp$  electr ons. At t heB rill ou in  zone b oundary thisch annel of s cr een ing is s tronglysuppressed that is refl e cted in  th e lar gervalues of  th e Coul omb $U$. T he scr eenin gbyi n tersi t e  C oul om b interact i o ns,  whic htake s place  in the ${\rm X}$- p oin t of the BZ,issubs t a nt ial l yw eak er and c annot fully com pensate th el ac k of the $ 4 sp$ -s creenin g. In t he ${ \ rm L}$- point ofthe BZ fo rthef c c l attice, th e modula tion of t h e $3d $ -e lectr ondensit yinthe C LDA ca l cul ation s is s uc h that  thenu mber ofnearest neighbors withexcess ive a nddeficient  nu m ber  of $3d$elec trons is t hesam e. Th ere f ore,thec on tri b ution s of intersite Co ulo m b  i nteractions t o  th e scr een i ng are  can celled out, resul t ing in the lar gest v alu e o f  the  e ffective $U$ i n t hi s point of  t he BZ.

  $\Gamma$  ${\rm  X}$  ${\rm  L}$
 
 with_a *flexible*_atomic basis set, like_in the_LMTO_method.[@LMTO] Then,_the_change of $F^0$_caused by relaxation_of the $3d$ orbitals_can be easily_evaluated_as[@PRB94.2] $$\Delta^{(2)} F^0=\frac{n_{3d}}{2} \frac{\partial F^0}{\partial n_{3d}}.$$ Since $n_{3d}$ is large in the fcc Ni,_this_contribution is_also_large._The situation can be different_in the GW scheme, based_on the_perturbation theory expansion, which requires a large basis_set.[@HybertsenLouie]_For example, in_order to describe properly the same relaxation of the_$3d$ wavefunctions, the polarization $P_{\rm GW}$_should explicitly include_the_excitation_from the occupied $3d$_to the unoccupied $4d$ (and probably_higher) states.[@FerdiGunnarsson]

\[sec:q\][**q**]{}-dependence of Coulomb $U$
--------------------------------------------

Since the_change of the number of $3d$ electrons_in transition metals is totally screened_by the $4sp$ electrons at_the same_atomic site,[@AnisimovGunnarsson] it is reasonable_to expect an_appreciable ${\bf_q}$-dependence of the_effective $U$. Results of CLDA calculations_for the high-symmetry_points of the Brillouin zone are_summarized_in Table \[tab:Uq\]. The_effective_$U$_appears to_be small in_the_$\Gamma$-point due_to_the perfect screening by the $4sp$_electrons._At the Brillouin zone boundary this channel_of screening is strongly_suppressed_that is reflected in_the larger values of the_Coulomb $U$. The screening by intersite_Coulomb interactions,_which takes_place in the ${\rm X}$-point of the BZ, is substantially weaker_and cannot fully compensate the lack_of the $4sp$-screening. In_the ${\rm_L}$-point_of the BZ_for_the fcc_lattice, the modulation of the $3d$-electron density_in the_CLDA calculations is such that the_number of nearest neighbors_with_excessive and deficient number of $3d$_electrons is the same. Therefore, the_contributions of intersite Coulomb interactions_to_the_screening are cancelled out, resulting_in the largest value of the_effective $U$ in_this point of the BZ.

  _$\Gamma$_  ${\rm X}$  _${\rm_L}$
  