-exciton pair coherences. Towards the negative detuning region the dispersive part Re$({\cal
F})$ increases whereas the absorptive part Im$({\cal F})$ goes to zero. The former comprises the mean-field contribution effectively reduced by the four-particle contribution. Indeed, the figure shows the case with a binding energy of 13.5 meV, it gives $V_{\text{xx}}
n_{\text{sat}} \simeq 11.39$ meV which clearly is an upper bound for Re$({\cal F})$ for negative detuning. The contribution carried by $F(t)$ determines an effective reduction of the mean-field interaction (through its imaginary part which adds up to $V_{\text{xx}}$) and an excitation induced dephasing. It has been shown [@Savasta; @PRL2003] that both effects depends on the sum of the energies of the scattered polariton pairs. The third term in Eq. (\[H-F\]) can be thought as a reminder of the mismatch between the picture of a biexciton as a composite pair of exciton. In the following we will set $\Gamma_{\text{xx}} \simeq 2
\Gamma_{\text{x}}$.

The other nonlinear source term in Eq. (\[R nl\]) depends directly on the exciton wave function and reads $$\sum_{\tilde{n} \tilde{k}} \langle \hat{B}_{\tilde n \tilde k}
\rangle^{*(1)} \sum_{n' k',n'' k''}C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde n
\tilde k,n k} \langle \hat{a}_{k'} \rangle^{(1)} \langle
\hat{B}_{n'' k''} \rangle^{(1)}\,.$$ It represents a phase-space filling (PSF) contribution, due to the Pauli blocking of electrons. It can be developed as follows, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{PSFconti}
&& C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde n \tilde k,n k} = V_{n' k'} {\langle1
\tilde{n} \tilde \sigma {\bf \tilde{k}}\mid} \delta_{(n' k');(n k)} -
[\hat{B}_{n \sigma {\bf k}}, \hat{B}^\dag_{n' \sigma' {\bf k
-exciton pair coherences. Towards the negative detuning region the diffusing character Re$({\cal 
 F})$ increases whereas the absorptive character Im$({\cal F})$ go to zero. The former comprises the beggarly - playing field contribution effectively boil down by the four - particle contribution. Indeed, the figure show the case with a binding energy of 13.5 meV, it give $ V_{\text{xx } } 
 n_{\text{sat } } \simeq 11.39 $ meV which clearly is an upper bound for Re$({\cal F})$ for negative detuning. The contribution carry by $ F(t)$ determines an effective reduction of the mean - playing field interaction (through its imaginary part which adds up to $ V_{\text{xx}}$) and an excitation induce dephasing. It has been shown [ @Savasta; @PRL2003 ] that both effects depends on the sum of the energies of the confused polariton pairs. The third term in Eq. (\[H - F\ ]) can be thought as a reminder of the mismatch between the picture of a biexciton as a composite pair of exciton. In the pursuit we will sic $ \Gamma_{\text{xx } } \simeq 2 
 \Gamma_{\text{x}}$. 

 The other nonlinear source term in Eq. (\[R nl\ ]) depends directly on the exciton wave function and reads $ $ \sum_{\tilde{n } \tilde{k } } \langle \hat{B}_{\tilde n \tilde k } 
 \rangle^{*(1) } \sum_{n' k',n" k''}C^{n' k',n" k''}_{\tilde n 
 \tilde k, n k } \langle \hat{a}_{k' } \rangle^{(1) } \langle 
 \hat{B}_{n" k" } \rangle^{(1)}\,.$$ It represents a phase - space woof (PSF) contribution, due to the Pauli blocking of electron. It can be developed as follows, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{PSFconti } 
 & & C^{n' k',n" k''}_{\tilde n \tilde k, n k } = V_{n' k' } { \langle1 
 \tilde{n } \tilde \sigma { \bf \tilde{k}}\mid } \delta_{(n' k');(n k) } - 
 [ \hat{B}_{n \sigma { \bf k } }, \hat{B}^\dag_{n' \sigma' { \bf k
-exclton pair coherences. Towxrds the negatirw detuiing refion the dispersive part Re$({\cal
F})$ incrxasew wheeeas the absorptive paft Im$({\cal V})$ goes ti zeco. The former comprises bke mezk-fielb rontribution efnectively raduced by the xojr-'article contribution. Indeed, the figtre shoes the case with a bpnqing vntrgy of 13.5 meV, it gives $V_{\text{xx}}
n_{\texf{sat}} \sikeq 11.39$ meV whicn clearly is an upper bounf fog Re$({\cal F})$ for negahive detunibg. Trw contributiun carried by $F(t)$ deterjines an effective reduction of the kean-field unrerwwtion (throujh its imaginary part whicv adds ip to $V_{\text{xx}}$) snd an excitation induced dxphasing. It has been shown [@Saeaata; @PRL2003] that both edfectv de[endr on tht snm kf the enxrgies of tge scatteree polariton pairs. Tne nnird term in Eq. (\[H-F\]) cwn be thought as a reminder of the mismdtcg between the picture od a biexciton as a colposite pwir of exciton. In the following we will set $\Gamma_{\dext{xe}} \rimtq 2
\Gammx_{\redt{x}}$.

The other nonlinear source term in Eq. (\[R nl\]) sekencs directly on the excitom aafg function and reads $$\suj_{\tilde{n} \tilde{k}} \lanhle \hat{F}_{\tildw n \tilde k}
\ramgle^{*(1)} \sum_{n' k',n'' k''}C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde b
\tilde k,n k} \jqngle \hat{a}_{k'} \rangle^{(1)} \langle
\hat{B}_{u'' k''} \ramgle^{(1)}\,.$$ Ot represents a phase-spcce fimling (PSF) clntributikv, due to the Pauui nlowking of electrons. It can fe develo'ed ax follods, $$\bggin{alidned}
\label{PDFconbh}
&& C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde n \tllde n,n k} = V_{n' k'} {\lwngle1
\tilde{n} \tilde \sigma {\bf \tildx{l}}\mid} \delta_{(n' l');(n k)} -
[\vat{B}_{n \siyma {\bf k}}, \hat{B}^\dag_{n' \sygma' {\bf k
-exciton pair coherences. Towards the negative detuning dispersive Re$({\cal F})$ whereas the absorptive zero. former comprises the contribution effectively reduced the four-particle contribution. Indeed, the figure the case with a binding energy of 13.5 meV, it gives $V_{\text{xx}} n_{\text{sat}} 11.39$ meV which clearly is an upper bound for Re$({\cal F})$ for negative The carried $F(t)$ an effective reduction of the mean-field interaction (through its imaginary part which adds up to $V_{\text{xx}}$) an excitation induced dephasing. It has been shown @PRL2003] that both effects on the sum of the of scattered polariton The term Eq. (\[H-F\]) can thought as a reminder of the mismatch between the picture of a biexciton as a composite pair exciton. In we will $\Gamma_{\text{xx}} 2 The other nonlinear in Eq. (\[R nl\]) depends directly wave function and reads $$\sum_{\tilde{n} \tilde{k}} \langle \hat{B}_{\tilde \tilde k} \sum_{n' k',n'' k''}C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde n k,n k} \langle \hat{a}_{k'} \rangle^{(1)} \langle \hat{B}_{n'' k''} It represents a phase-space filling (PSF) contribution, due to the Pauli blocking of electrons. It developed as follows, $$\begin{aligned} && C^{n' k',n'' n k,n = k'} {\langle1 \tilde \sigma {\bf \tilde{k}}\mid} \delta_{(n' k');(n k)} - [\hat{B}_{n \sigma {\bf \hat{B}^\dag_{n' \sigma' {\bf k
-exciton pair coherences. TowaRds the negaTive dEtuNinG rEgioN the Dispersive part rE$({\cal
f})$ increases whereas the abSorptIvE Part iM$({\cAl F})$ goEs to zerO. thE FOrmEr CoMprIsES tHe meaN-fiEld contRibution efFecTiVely reduced bY ThE four-partiCle Contribution. indEed, the FiGurE Shows The Case wIth a biNDing enErgy of 13.5 meV, It GIves $V_{\tEXt{xx}}
n_{\teXT{SaT}} \simEq 11.39$ meV which clearly IS aN Upper bound for RE$({\cal F})$ fOr NEgATIve DetUning. The coNtRibutIOn carriED bY $f(T)$ DetERmines an effecTive reductiON of The meaN-fIelD InteraCtion (ThROugH its imaginaRy paRt which adDs up to $v_{\Text{xx}}$) aND an exciTation IndUceD depHAsInG. It HaS BeeN ShOwn [@sAvaSta; @PRL2003] thAt BoTh effEcts DEPENds oN thE sum Of the Energies of the ScaTterED poLaritOn paiRs. ThE tHird tErm in EQ. (\[H-F\]) caN bE thought as a remiNder Of the mismAtcH bEtwEeN the pICture oF a bIexCiton as A composITe pAiR OF ExCiton. In the followinG wE WIlL set $\GammA_{\text{xX}} \SiMeQ 2
\gamma_{\texT{x}}$.

the OtheR NOnlinEar sOUrCe term in eq. (\[R nl\]) dEPeNdS directLy On the eXcItoN waVe funCTion And reaDs $$\sum_{\tilDe{n} \tiLDe{k}} \langle \hat{B}_{\tILde n \tilde k}
\ranGLe^{*(1)} \SUM_{n' K',N'' k''}C^{n' K',n'' k''}_{\Tilde n
\tilde K,n k} \lANgle \Hat{a}_{K'} \RaNglE^{(1)} \LanglE
\hat{B}_{N'' k''} \RAnGLe^{(1)}\,.$$ It represents a phasE-sPace fiLling (pSF) contributiOn, due to the pAULi blockiNg of ELeCTrons. It can be deVelopEd as followS, $$\Begin{aliGned}
\lAbel{PSFcOnti}
&& C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\TILde n \tildE k,n K} = V_{n' K'} {\laNglE1
\TIlDe{n} \tilde \sigma {\BF \TildE{k}}\Mid} \deltA_{(n' k');(N k)} -
[\hat{B}_{n \SigMa {\bF k}}, \hAt{B}^\DaG_{n' \sigma' {\bf K
-exciton pair coherences.Towards th e neg ati vede tuni ng r egion the disp e rsiv e part Re$({\cal
F})$incre as e s wh e re as th e absor p ti v e  pa rt  I m$( {\ c al  F})$  go es to z ero. The f orm er  comprises t h emean-field  co ntribution e ffe ctivel yred u ced b y t he fo ur-par t icle c ontributi on .  Indee d , the f i g ur e sh ows the case with ab inding energyof 13. 5m eV , itgiv es $V_{\te xt {xx}} n_{\tex t {s a t } } \ s imeq 11.39$ m eV which cl e arl y is a nupp e r boun d for  R e $({ \cal F})$ f or n egative d etunin g . The c o ntribut ion ca rri edby $ F (t )$  de te r min e sane ffe ctive re du ct ion o f th e m e an-f iel d in terac tion (through  it s im a gin ary p art w hich  a dds u p to $ V_{\t ex t{xx}}$) and an  exc itation i ndu ce d d ep hasin g . It h asbee n shown  [@Sava s ta;  @ P R L 20 03] that both effe ct s de pends on  the s u mof the ener gi esof t h e  scat tere d  p olariton  pairs .  T he  thirdte rm inEq . ( \[H -F\]) canbe tho ught asa rem i nder of the mi s match between th e pi c ture  of  a biexcito n as a co mpos i te  pa i r ofexcit on .  I n  the following we w il l set$\Gam ma_{\text{xx} } \simeq 2 \ G amma_{\t ext{ x }} $ .

The other n onlin ear source term inEq. ( \[R nl\] ) depends d irectlyonthe  ex cit o n  w ave functiona n d re ad s $$\su m_{ \tilde{ n}\ti lde {k} }\langle \ hat{B}_{ \t il de  n  \t ildek }
\rangl e^ {*( 1) } \ sum_{ n ' k',n '' k' '}C^ {n 'k ',n '' k''} _ {\ t i lden\t ilde  k, nk} \l angl e  \h at{a}_{ k'} \rang le^ { (1)}  \ la ngle
\h at{B}_{n'' k' '}  \rangle^{ (1 )}\ ,.$$ I t represen ts a phase-space fillin g  (PSF)con tribu tion , due tothe  Pauli  bl o ckingof ele ctron s.  It c an be d ev elo pe d as follo w s , $ $\beg in {ali gned}
\ label{PSFconti}
&& C^{ n' k',n'' k'' }_{ \til d e  n  \t i ld e  k, nk } = V _{n' k'} {\lang le1
\tilde {n }  \ tilde \sig m a { \b f \tild e{k}}\m id} \ d elta_{( n' k');(n  k)} -
[\ ha t{B} _ { n \ sigma {\bf  k}}, \h at{B}^\da g _{n'\ si gma'{\b f k
-exciton pair_coherences. Towards_the negative detuning region_the dispersive_part_Re$({\cal
F})$ increases_whereas_the absorptive part_Im$({\cal F})$ goes_to zero. The former_comprises the mean-field_contribution_effectively reduced by the four-particle contribution. Indeed, the figure shows the case with a_binding_energy of_13.5_meV,_it gives $V_{\text{xx}}
n_{\text{sat}} \simeq 11.39$_meV which clearly is an_upper bound_for Re$({\cal F})$ for negative detuning. The contribution_carried_by $F(t)$ determines_an effective reduction of the mean-field interaction (through its_imaginary part which adds up to_$V_{\text{xx}}$) and an_excitation_induced_dephasing. It has been_shown [@Savasta; @PRL2003] that both effects_depends on the sum of the_energies of the scattered polariton pairs. The_third term in Eq. (\[H-F\]) can_be thought as a reminder_of the_mismatch between the picture of_a biexciton as_a composite_pair of exciton._In the following we will set_$\Gamma_{\text{xx}} \simeq 2
\Gamma_{\text{x}}$.

The_other nonlinear source term in Eq._(\[R_nl\]) depends directly_on_the_exciton wave_function and reads_$$\sum_{\tilde{n}_\tilde{k}} \langle_\hat{B}_{\tilde_n \tilde k}
\rangle^{*(1)} \sum_{n' k',n'' k''}C^{n'_k',n''_k''}_{\tilde n
\tilde k,n k} \langle \hat{a}_{k'} \rangle^{(1)}_\langle
\hat{B}_{n'' k''} \rangle^{(1)}\,.$$ It_represents_a phase-space filling (PSF)_contribution, due to the Pauli_blocking of electrons. It can be_developed as_follows, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{PSFconti}
&&_C^{n' k',n'' k''}_{\tilde n \tilde k,n k} = V_{n' k'} {\langle1
\tilde{n}_\tilde \sigma {\bf \tilde{k}}\mid} \delta_{(n' k');(n_k)} -
[\hat{B}_{n \sigma {\bf_k}}, \hat{B}^\dag_{n'_\sigma'_{\bf k