_3}} \approx \lambda^{ - \delta}.$$ Let $f_1 = {\mathbbold{1}}_A$, $f_2 = {\mathbbold{1}}_B$, $f_3 = {\mathbbold{1}}_C$. Then using the conditions (\[prop - counter examples - set cond 1\] - \[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\]) we have $$\begin{aligned}
            \int_{\Gamma} \mathfrak{m}(\tau, \xi) \Pi_{j=1}^3 f_j(\tau_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tau, \xi) &\gtrsim \lambda^{-\delta} \int_B \int_C d\tau_3d\xi_3d\tau_2d\xi_2 \\
            &\approx \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta}.
        \end{aligned}$$ Therefore, assuming that the inequality (\[main est fourier side\]) holds, we must have $$\lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta} {\lesssim}|A|^{\frac{1}{2}} |B|^{\frac{1}{2}} |C|^{\frac{1}{2}} \approx \lambda^{\frac{d_1 + d_2 + d_3}{2}}.$$ By choosing $\lambda$ large, we then derive the necessary condition $$\label{prop - counter examples - necessary cond} \delta + \frac{ d_1 - d_2 - d_3}{2} {\geqslant}0.$$ Thus it will suffice to find sets $A$, $B$, and $C$ satisfying the conditions (\[prop - counter examples - set cond 1\] - \[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\]) with particular values of $\delta$, $d_1$, $d_2$, and $d_3$.\
**$\bullet$ Necessity of (\[prop - counter examples - b cond\]).** We first show that $b_j + b_k {\geqslant}0$. Since the estimate (\[main est fourier side\]) is symmetric in $b_1$, $b_2$, it suffices to consider the pairs $(j, k) \in \{(1, 2), \, (1, 3)\}$. For the first pair, we choose $$B= \{|\tau +\lambda|{\leqslant}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\leqslant}1 \}, \qquad C = \{|\tau
_ 3 } } \approx \lambda^ { - \delta}.$$ Let $ f_1 = { \mathbbold{1}}_A$, $ f_2 = { \mathbbold{1}}_B$, $ f_3 = { \mathbbold{1}}_C$. Then using the conditions (\[prop - counter exemplar - rig cond 1\ ] - \[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\ ]) we own $ $ \begin{aligned } 
             \int_{\Gamma } \mathfrak{m}(\tau, \xi) \Pi_{j=1}^3 f_j(\tau_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tau, \xi) & \gtrsim \lambda^{-\delta } \int_B \int_C d\tau_3d\xi_3d\tau_2d\xi_2 \\ 
             & \approx \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta }. 
         \end{aligned}$$ Therefore, assuming that the inequality (\[main eastern time fourier side\ ]) holds, we must have $ $ \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta } { \lesssim}|A|^{\frac{1}{2 } } |B|^{\frac{1}{2 } } |C|^{\frac{1}{2 } } \approx \lambda^{\frac{d_1 + d_2 + d_3}{2}}.$$ By choosing $ \lambda$ bombastic, we then derive the necessary condition $ $ \label{prop - counterpunch examples - necessary cond } \delta + \frac { d_1 - d_2 - d_3}{2 } { \geqslant}0.$$ Thus it will suffice to rule sets $ A$, $ B$, and $ C$ satisfying the conditions (\[prop - counter examples - sic cond 1\ ] - \[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\ ]) with finical values of $ \delta$, $ d_1 $, $ d_2 $, and $ d_3$.\ 
 * * $ \bullet$ Necessity of (\[prop - counter examples - b cond\ ]). * * We foremost show that $ b_j + b_k { \geqslant}0$. Since the appraisal (\[main est fourier side\ ]) is symmetric in $ b_1 $, $ b_2 $, it suffices to consider the pairs $ (j, k) \in \{(1, 2), \, (1, 3)\}$. For the beginning pair, we choose $ $ B= \{|\tau + \lambda|{\leqslant}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\leqslant}1 \ }, \qquad C = \{|\tau
_3}} \aporox \lambda^{ - \delta}.$$ Let $f_1 = {\mathbbold{1}}_A$, $f_2 = {\mathbbmld{1}}_B$, $f_3 = {\mathbbuld{1}}_C$. Then using the conditiois (\[peop - xounter examples - set zond 1\] - \[prlp - counrer txamples - set conv 3\]) we hayz $$\begjk{aliguev}
            \inj_{\Gamma} \mathfsak{m}(\tau, \xi) \Pi_{j=1}^3 f_g(\tcu_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tau, \xi) &\gtrsim \lambda^{-\dejta} \int_N \lnt_C d\tau_3d\xi_3d\twu_2d\xp_2 \\
            &\approx \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta}.
        \eid{aligned}$$ Theregore, assuming that the ineeuallty (\[main est fourifr side\]) holes, wq must have $$\lxmbda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta} {\lesssjm}|A|^{\frac{1}{2}} |B|^{\frac{1}{2}} |C|^{\frac{1}{2}} \approx \lambaa^{\frae{d_1 + d_2 + d_3}{2}}.$$ By cyoodhng $\lambda$ oarge, we then derlne the tecessaty condition $$\lsben{prip - counter examples - necessary cond} \dejta + \frac{ d_1 - d_2 - d_3}{2} {\geqslant}0.$$ Tyuw it fill sufwuce to fmnd sets $W$, $B$, and $C$ satjsfying the conditions (\[prop - cpugnrr examples - set cjnq 1\] - \[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\]) wpth larticular values of $\deota$, $d_1$, $d_2$, and $d_3$.\
**$\bullet$ Ngcessity os (\[prop - counter examples - b cond\]).** We first show thdt $b_j + b_k {\gcqslxbt}0$. Since the estimate (\[main est fourier side\]) is fgmkenric in $b_1$, $b_2$, it sunfices to consider tje kairs $(j, k) \in \{(1, 2), \, (1, 3)\}$. Fox tge first pair, we cjoose $$B= \{|\tau +\oambda|{\leqflany}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\leqslant}1 \}, \qquad C = \{|\tau
_3}} \approx \lambda^{ - \delta}.$$ Let $f_1 $f_2 {\mathbbold{1}}_B$, $f_3 {\mathbbold{1}}_C$. Then using examples set cond 1\] \[prop - counter - set cond 3\]) we have \int_{\Gamma} \mathfrak{m}(\tau, \xi) \Pi_{j=1}^3 f_j(\tau_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tau, \xi) &\gtrsim \lambda^{-\delta} \int_B \int_C d\tau_3d\xi_3d\tau_2d\xi_2 &\approx \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta}. \end{aligned}$$ Therefore, assuming that the inequality (\[main fourier holds, must $$\lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta} {\lesssim}|A|^{\frac{1}{2}} |B|^{\frac{1}{2}} |C|^{\frac{1}{2}} \approx \lambda^{\frac{d_1 + d_2 + d_3}{2}}.$$ By choosing large, we then derive the necessary condition $$\label{prop counter examples - necessary \delta + \frac{ d_1 - - {\geqslant}0.$$ Thus will to sets $A$, $B$, $C$ satisfying the conditions (\[prop - counter examples - set cond 1\] - \[prop - counter examples set cond particular values $\delta$, $d_2$, $d_3$.\ **$\bullet$ Necessity - counter examples - b cond\]).** that $b_j + b_k {\geqslant}0$. Since the estimate est fourier is symmetric in $b_1$, $b_2$, it to consider the pairs $(j, k) \in \{(1, \, (1, 3)\}$. For the first pair, we choose $$B= \{|\tau +\lambda|{\leqslant}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\leqslant}1 \}, \qquad \{|\tau
_3}} \approx \lambda^{ - \delta}.$$ Let $f_1 = {\mathBbold{1}}_A$, $f_2 = {\matHbbolD{1}}_B$, $f_3 = {\MatHbBold{1}}_c$. TheN using the condiTIons (\[Prop - counter examples - set Cond 1\] - \[pRoP - CounTEr ExampLes - set cONd 3\]) WE HavE $$\bEgIn{aLiGNeD}
            \int_{\GAmmA} \mathfrAk{m}(\tau, \xi) \Pi_{J=1}^3 f_j(\TaU_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tAU, \xI) &\gtrsim \lamBda^{-\Delta} \int_B \int_c d\tAu_3d\xi_3d\TaU_2d\xI_2 \\
            &\ApproX \laMbda^{d_2 + D_3 - \delta}.
        \ENd{aligNed}$$ TherefOrE, AssumiNG that thE INeQualIty (\[main est fourier SIdE\]) Holds, we must havE $$\lambdA^{d_2 + D_3 - \DeLTA} {\leSssIm}|A|^{\frac{1}{2}} |B|^{\frAc{1}{2}} |c|^{\frac{1}{2}} \APprox \laMBdA^{\FRAc{d_1 + D_2 + D_3}{2}}.$$ By choosing $\laMbda$ large, we THen Derive ThE neCEssary CondiTiON $$\laBel{prop - counTer eXamples - neCessarY Cond} \delTA + \frac{ d_1 - d_2 - D_3}{2} {\geqslAnt}0.$$ thuS it wILl SuFfiCe TO fiND sEts $a$, $b$, anD $C$ satisfYiNg The coNditIONS (\[Prop - CouNter ExampLes - set cond 1\] - \[proP - coUnteR ExaMples - Set coNd 3\]) wiTh PartiCular vAlues Of $\Delta$, $d_1$, $d_2$, and $d_3$.\
**$\bullEt$ NeCessity of (\[ProP - cOunTeR examPLes - b coNd\]).** WE fiRst show That $b_j + b_K {\GeqSlANT}0$. siNce the estimate (\[main EsT FOuRier side\]) Is symmETrIc IN $b_1$, $b_2$, it sufFiCes To coNSIder tHe paIRs $(J, k) \in \{(1, 2), \, (1, 3)\}$. For tHe firsT PaIr, We choosE $$B= \{|\Tau +\lamBdA|{\leQslAnt}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\LEqslAnt}1 \}, \qquAd C = \{|\tau
_3}} \approx \lambda^{ - \ delta}.$$Let $ f_1  ={\ math bbol d{1}}_A$, $f_2 = {\ mathbbold{1}}_B$, $f_3  = {\ ma t hbbo l d{ 1}}_C $. Then us i n g t he  c ond it i on s (\[ pro p - cou nter examp les  -  set cond 1\ ]  -  \[prop -cou nter example s -  set c on d 3 \ ]) we  ha ve $$ \begin { aligne d}
         \in t _{\Gamm a }  \ math frak{m}(\tau, \xi )  \ P i_{j=1}^3 f_j( \tau_j ,\ xi _ j ) d \si gma(\tau,\x i) &\ g trsim \ l am b d a ^{- \ delta} \int_B  \int_C d\t a u_3 d\xi_3 d\ tau _ 2d\xi_ 2 \\         &\app rox\lambda^{ d_2 +d _3 - \d e lta}.
      \e nd{ alig n ed }$ $ T he r efo r e,  as s umi ng thatth einequ alit y ( \ [mai n e st f ourie r side\]) hol ds,  wem ust  have  $$\l ambd a^ {d_2+ d_3- \de lt a} {\lesssim}|A |^{\ frac{1}{2 }}|B |^{ \f rac{1 } {2}} | C|^ {\f rac{1}{ 2}} \ap p rox  \ l a m bd a^{\frac{d_1 + d_2  + d _3 }{2}}.$$  By ch o os in g  $\lambd a$  la rge, w e the n de r iv e the ne cessar y  c on dition$$ \label {p rop  -count e r ex amples  - neces saryc ond} \delta +\ frac{ d_1 - d _ 2- d_ 3 }{2}  {\ geqslant}0. $$ T h us i t wi l lsuf f ice t o fin ds et s  $A$, $B$, and $C$sa tisfyi ng th e conditions(\[prop -c o u nter exa mple s  - set cond 1\] -  \[pr op - count e r exampl es -set cond  3\]) wit h particul arval ues  of $ \d elta$, $d_1$, $ d_2$ ,and $d_ 3$. \
**$\b ull et$  Ne ces si ty of (\[ prop - c ou nt er  e xam ples-  b cond\ ]) .**  W e f irsts how th at $b _j +  b _k {\g eqslant } 0$ . Sinc eth e es tim at e (\[ main est  fourie r side\])  is symm et ri c in $b _1$, $b_2$, i tsuffices t ocon sidert h e pairs$(j, k) \in \{(1, 2), \ ,  (1, 3) \}$ . For  the  first pa ir,  we ch oos e  $$B=\{|\ta u +\l am bda | { \leqs l a nt }1,  \ ,\,\,|\xi| { \ leq slant }1  \},  \qquad  C = \{|\tau
_3}} \approx_\lambda^{ -_\delta}.$$ Let $f_1 =_{\mathbbold{1}}_A$, $f_2_=_{\mathbbold{1}}_B$, $f_3_=_{\mathbbold{1}}_C$. Then using_the conditions (\[prop_- counter examples -_set cond 1\]_-_\[prop - counter examples - set cond 3\]) we have $$\begin{aligned}
   __ ___   \int_{\Gamma} \mathfrak{m}(\tau,_\xi) \Pi_{j=1}^3 f_j(\tau_j, \xi_j) d\sigma(\tau,_\xi) &\gtrsim_\lambda^{-\delta} \int_B \int_C d\tau_3d\xi_3d\tau_2d\xi_2 \\
   __  _    &\approx \lambda^{d_2 + d_3 -_\delta}.
     _  \end{aligned}$$_Therefore,_assuming_that the inequality (\[main_est fourier side\]) holds, we must_have $$\lambda^{d_2 + d_3 - \delta}_{\lesssim}|A|^{\frac{1}{2}} |B|^{\frac{1}{2}} |C|^{\frac{1}{2}} \approx \lambda^{\frac{d_1 + d_2_+ d_3}{2}}.$$ By choosing $\lambda$ large,_we then derive the necessary_condition $$\label{prop_- counter examples - necessary_cond} \delta +_\frac{ d_1_- d_2 -_d_3}{2} {\geqslant}0.$$ Thus it will suffice_to find sets_$A$, $B$, and $C$ satisfying the_conditions_(\[prop - counter_examples_-_set cond_1\] - \[prop_-_counter examples_-_set cond 3\]) with particular values_of_$\delta$, $d_1$, $d_2$, and $d_3$.\
**$\bullet$ Necessity of_(\[prop - counter examples_-_b cond\]).** We first_show that $b_j + b_k_{\geqslant}0$. Since the estimate (\[main est_fourier side\])_is symmetric_in $b_1$, $b_2$, it suffices to consider the pairs $(j, k)_\in \{(1, 2), \, (1, 3)\}$._For the first pair,_we choose_$$B=_\{|\tau +\lambda|{\leqslant}1, \,\,\,|\xi|{\leqslant}1_\},_\qquad C_= \{|\tau