 $\umu\in{\mathcal E}_{j,k+1}$, one associates the term\
&:=&\_[D]{} dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} e\^[i(t-t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 for a measurable subset $D\subset[0,t]^j$. Then, it is proven in [@klma] that \[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]\
&& \_[\_[j,k+1]{}]{} B\_[k+1]{} ( \_j(\_0)\^[(k+1)]{}(t) )\_ \_[L\^2\_[tI]{}H\^]{}. For the proof of (\[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]) in the case of the cubic GP hierarchy, we refer to [@klma]. For the case of the quintic GP hierarchy, we refer to [@chpa].

We have, under the given assumptions on $\alpha$, that for $I=[0,T]$ and $D\subset I^j$,\
&& \_[=1]{}\^k \_[D]{} dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t-t\_1) \_\^[(k+1)]{}]{} B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{} e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 \_[L\^1\_[tI]{}H\^\_k]{}\
&& k \_[I]{} dt \_D dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t - t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e
$ \umu\in{\mathcal E}_{j, k+1}$, one associates the term\ 
 &: = & \_[D ] { } dt\_1 dt\_[j ] { } e\^[i(t - t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1 - t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\ 
 & & e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j) ] { } ] { } B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1) ] { } ] { } \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 for a measurable subset $ D\subset[0,t]^j$. Then, it is proven in [ @klma ] that \[eq - klma - boardgame - dec-1\]\ 
 & & \_[\_[j, k+1 ] { } ] { } B\_[k+1 ] { } (\_j(\_0)\^[(k+1)]{}(t) ) \ _ \_[L\^2\_[tI]{}H\^ ] { }. For the proof of (\[eq - klma - boardgame - dec-1\ ]) in the case of the cubic general practitioner hierarchy, we denote to [ @klma ]. For the case of the quintic GP hierarchy, we refer to [ @chpa ]. 

 We have, under the give assumption on $ \alpha$, that for $ I=[0,T]$ and $ D\subset I^j$,\ 
 & & \_[=1]{}\^k \_[D ] { } dt\_1 dt\_[j ] { } B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t - t\_1) \_\^[(k+1) ] { } ] { } B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1 - t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\ 
 & & e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j) ] { } ] { } B\_[(j),k+j+1 ] { } e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1) ] { } ] { } \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 \_[L\^1\_[tI]{}H\^\_k]{}\ 
 & & k \_[I ] { } dt \_D dt\_1 dt\_[j ] { } B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t - t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e
 $\umk\in{\mathcal E}_{j,k+1}$, one assoclates the term\
&:=&\_[D]{} br\_1 dt\_[j]{} x\^[i(t-t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}s\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(g\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 for a mwasurqble subset $D\subset[0,t]^j$. Ghen, it id proven in [@joma] that \[eq-klma-boavbgame-scc-1\]\
&& \_[\_[j,k+1]{}]{} U\_[k+1]{} ( \_j(\_0)\^[(k+1)]{}(t) )\_ \_[L\^2\_[tI]{}H\^]{}. Fpr the promf of (\[eq-klma-bodragcme-dec-1\]) in the case of the cubic GP hyerarchu, ae refer to [@klia]. Fpw ths case of the quintic GP hierarchy, we reftr to [@chpa].

We have, inder the given assumptiond on $\alpha$, that for $I=[0,T]$ and $D\subsej I^j$,\
&& \_[=1]{}\^j \_[D]{} dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,y+1]{}e\^[i(t-t\_1) \_\^[(k+1)]{}]{} B\_[(1),k+2]{}t\^[i(c\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+n)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{} e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 \_[L\^1\_[tI]{}H\^\_k]{}\
&& k \_[I]{} dt \_D dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t - r\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),n+2]{}g
$\umu\in{\mathcal E}_{j,k+1}$, one associates the term\ &:=&\_[D]{} e\^[i(t-t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\ e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 for it proven in [@klma] \[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]\ && \_[\_[j,k+1]{}]{} ( \_j(\_0)\^[(k+1)]{}(t) )\_ \_[L\^2\_[tI]{}H\^]{}. For the of (\[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]) in the case of the cubic GP hierarchy, we refer to For the case of the quintic GP hierarchy, we refer to [@chpa]. We under given on that for $I=[0,T]$ and $D\subset I^j$,\ && \_[=1]{}\^k \_[D]{} dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t-t\_1) \_\^[(k+1)]{}]{} B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\ && e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 \_[L\^1\_[tI]{}H\^\_k]{}\ && k \_[I]{} \_D dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e
 $\umu\in{\mathcal E}_{j,k+1}$, one associaTes the term\
&:=&\_[d]{} dt\_1 dt\_[J]{} e\^[i(T-t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}b\_[(1),k+2]{}E\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(K+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(t\_[J-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i t\_j \_\^[(k+J+1)]{}]{} \^[(K+j+1)]{}\_0 foR a measurable subset $D\subSet[0,t]^j$. thEN, it iS PrOven iN [@klma] thAT \[eQ-KLma-BoArDgaMe-DEc-1\]\
&& \_[\_[J,k+1]{}]{} B\_[k+1]{} ( \_j(\_0)\^[(K+1)]{}(t) )\_ \_[L\^2\_[TI]{}H\^]{}. For tHe proof of (\[eQ-klMa-Boardgame-dec-1\]) IN tHe case of thE cuBic GP hierarcHy, wE refer To [@KlmA]. for thE caSe of tHe quinTIc GP hiErarchy, we ReFEr to [@chPA].

We have, UNDeR the Given assumptions oN $\AlPHa$, that for $I=[0,T]$ and $d\subseT I^J$,\
&& \_[=1]{}\^K \_[D]{} DT\_1 Dt\_[j]{} b\_[,k+1]{}e\^[I(t-t\_1) \_\^[(k+1)]{}]{} B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(K+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[I(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(K+J)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{} e\^[i T\_J \_\^[(k+J+1)]{}]{} \^[(K+J+1)]{}\_0 \_[l\^1\_[tI]{}h\^\_K]{}\
&& k \_[I]{} dt \_D dt\_1 dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}E\^[i(t - t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e
 $\umu\in{\mathcal E}_{j,k +1}$, oneassoc iat esth e te rm\&:=&\_[D]{} dt \ _1 d t\_[j]{} e\^[i(t-t\_1) \_\^[ (k + 1)]{ } ]{ }B\_[ (1),k+2 ] {} e \ ^[i (t \_ 1-t \_ 2 )\ _\^[( k+2 )]{}]{} \
&& e\^[i (t\ _[ j-1]{}-t\_[j ] {} )\_\^[(k+j )]{ }]{} B\_[(j) ,k+ j+1]{} e\ ^[i t\_j\_\ ^[(k+ j+1)]{ } ]{} \^ [(k+j+1)] {} \ _0 for a measu r a bl e su bset $D\subset[0, t ]^ j $. Then, it is  prove ni n[ @ klm a]that \[eq- kl ma-bo a rdgame- d ec - 1 \ ]\& & \_[\_[j,k+1 ]{}]{} B\_[ k +1] {} ( \ _j (\_ 0 )\^[(k +1)]{ }( t ) ) \_ \_[L\^2\ _[tI ]{}H\^]{} . Fort he proo f  of (\[ eq-klm a-b oar dgam e -d ec -1\ ]) int he  ca s e o f the cu bi cGP hi erar c h y ,  weref er t o [@k lma]. For the  ca se o f  th e qui nticGP h ie rarch y, werefer  t o [@chpa].

Wehave , under t hegi ven  a ssump t ions o n $ \al pha$, t hat for $I= [0 , T ] $and $D\subset I^j$ ,\ & &\_[=1]{} \^k \_ [ D] {} dt\_1 dt \_ [j] {} B \ _ [,k+1 ]{}e \ ^[ i(t-t\_1 ) \_\^ [ (k +1 )]{}]{}  B \_[(1) ,k +2] {}e \^[i( t \_1- t\_2)\ _\^[(k+2 )]{}] { }\
&& e\^[i(t\ _ [j-1]{}-t\_[j ] {} ) \ _\ ^ [(k+ j)] {}]{} B\_[( j),k + j+1] {} e \ ^[ i t \ _j \_ \^[(k +j + 1) ] {}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{} \_ 0 \_[L \^1\_ [tI]{}H\^\_k] {}\
&& k \ _ [ I ]{} dt \ _D d t \_ 1  dt\_[j]{} B\_ [,k+1 ]{}e\^[i(t - t\_1)\ _\^[( k+1)]{}] {}B\_[(1) , k +2]{}e
 $\umu\in{\mathcal_E}_{j,k+1}$, one_associates the term\
&:=&\_[D]{} dt\_1_dt\_[j]{} e\^[i(t-t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&&_e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{}_B\_[(j),k+j+1]{}e\^[i t\_j_\_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{}_\^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0 for a_measurable subset $D\subset[0,t]^j$._Then, it is proven_in [@klma] that_\[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]\
&&_\_[\_[j,k+1]{}]{} B\_[k+1]{} ( \_j(\_0)\^[(k+1)]{}(t) )\_ \_[L\^2\_[tI]{}H\^]{}. For the proof of (\[eq-klma-boardgame-dec-1\]) in the case_of_the cubic_GP_hierarchy,_we refer to [@klma]. For_the case of the quintic_GP hierarchy,_we refer to [@chpa].

We have, under the given_assumptions_on $\alpha$, that_for $I=[0,T]$ and $D\subset I^j$,\
&& \_[=1]{}\^k \_[D]{} dt\_1 dt\_[j]{}_B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t-t\_1) \_\^[(k+1)]{}]{} B\_[(1),k+2]{}e\^[i(t\_1-t\_2)\_\^[(k+2)]{}]{}\
&& e\^[i(t\_[j-1]{}-t\_[j]{})\_\^[(k+j)]{}]{} B\_[(j),k+j+1]{} e\^[i_t\_j \_\^[(k+j+1)]{}]{} \^[(k+j+1)]{}\_0_\_[L\^1\_[tI]{}H\^\_k]{}\
&&_k_\_[I]{} dt \_D dt\_1_dt\_[j]{} B\_[,k+1]{}e\^[i(t - t\_1)\_\^[(k+1)]{}]{}B\_[(1),k+2]{}e