colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf2\]

3.  For any homotopy finite category $A$, the colimit morphism $\colim : {\sD}^A \to {\sD}$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf3\]

4.  For any left homotopy finite functor $u:A\to B$, the left Kan extension morphism $u_!: {\sD}^A \to {\sD}^B$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf4\]

5.  The fiber morphism $F\colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a left adjoint.\[item:sf2a\]

6.  For any homotopy finite category $A$, the limit morphism $\lim : {\sD}^A \to {\sD}$ is a left adjoint.\[item:sf3a\]

7.  For any right homotopy finite functor $u:A\to B$, the right Kan extension morphism $u_*: {\sD}^A \to {\sD}^B$ is a left adjoint.\[item:sf4a\]

8.  The adjoint $7$-tuple extends to a doubly-infinite chain of adjoint morphisms.\[item:sf5\]

Combining \[thm:stable-lim-III,thm:stab-op\], we see that \[item:sf1\] implies \[item:sf4\], which clearly implies \[item:sf3\], while \[item:sf3\] implies \[item:sf2\] since the cone is a composite of a right extension by zero with a pushout. And \[item:sf2\] implies \[item:sf1\] by \[thm:stable-lim-III\]\[item:sl6\], since right adjoints preserve all limits, so the first four statements are equivalent. The equivalence of \[item:sf1\] with \[item:sf2a\], \[item:sf3a\], and \[item:sf4a\] is dual. Evidently \[item:sf5\] implies \[item:sf2\]. And conversely, if is a stable derivator, then by there are natural isomorphisms $$\Sigma F\toiso C\qquad\text{and}\qquad F\toiso\Omega C.$$ Since $\Sigma$ and $\Omega$ are equivalences in stable derivators (),
colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a right adjoint.\[item: sf2\ ] 

 3.   For any homotopy finite category $ A$, the colimit morphism $ \colim: { \sD}^A \to { \sD}$ is a right adjoint.\[item: sf3\ ] 

 4.   For any left homotopy finite functor $ u: A\to B$, the leftover Kan elongation morphism $ u _! : { \sD}^A \to { \sD}^B$ is a right adjoint.\[item: sf4\ ] 

 5.   The roughage morphism $ F\colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a leftover adjoint.\[item: sf2a\ ] 

 6.   For any homotopy finite category $ A$, the limit morphism $ \lim: { \sD}^A \to { \sD}$ is a left adjoint.\[item: sf3a\ ] 

 7.   For any good homotopy finite functor $ u: A\to B$, the right Kan extension morphism $ uracil _ *: { \sD}^A \to { \sD}^B$ is a left adjoint.\[item: sf4a\ ] 

 8.   The adjoint $ 7$-tuple extends to a doubly - countless chain of adjoint morphisms.\[item: sf5\ ] 

 Combining \[thm: stable - lim - III, thm: stab - op\ ], we see that   \[item: sf1\ ] incriminate   \[item: sf4\ ], which clearly entail   \[item: sf3\ ], while   \[item: sf3\ ] implies   \[item: sf2\ ] since the cone is a composite of a correct extension by zero with a pushout. And   \[item: sf2\ ] implies   \[item: sf1\ ] by \[thm: stable - lim - III\]\[item: sl6\ ], since correct adjoints preserve all limits, so the first four statements are equivalent. The equality of   \[item: sf1\ ] with   \[item: sf2a\ ], \[item: sf3a\ ], and   \[item: sf4a\ ] is dual. Evidently   \[item: sf5\ ] implies   \[item: sf2\ ]. And conversely, if is a stable derivator, then by there are lifelike isomorphisms $ $ \Sigma F\toiso C\qquad\text{and}\qquad F\toiso\Omega C.$$ Since $ \Sigma$ and $ \Omega$ are equivalences in stable derivators (),
colln{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a right adjolnt.\[item:sf2\]

3.  For aut homovopy fihite catdgory $A$, the colimit morphism $\cilim : {\sD}^A \to {\sD}$ is a right xdjoint.\[itvm:sf3\]

4.  For any oeft homotopy finibz fundbor $u:C\ti B$, the left Ksn extensimn morphism $u_!: {\vD}^X \co {\sD}^B$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf4\]

5.  The fiber kogphism $F\colon{\sQ}^{[1]}\to{\sC}$ is z left adjoint.\[item:sf2a\]

6.  For any homktopy fpnite category $A$, yhe limit morphism $\lim : {\sD}^W \to {\sD}$ is a left adjolnt.\[item:sf3a\]

7.  For qny right hoootopy finpce functor $o:A\to B$, the right Kan extension murphixm $u_*: {\sD}^A \ti {\wD}^B$ hs a left avjoint.\[ptem:sf4a\]

8.  The adjoint $7$-duple ectends to a dombly-iifinute chain of adjoint korphisms.\[item:sf5\]

Comfining \[thk:scable-lim-III,thm:stab-op\], qe see jhat \[idem:sw1\] imolits \[ivem:af4\], whifh rlearly impmies \[item:sf3\], qhile \[item:sf3\] implies \[otqn:sf2\] since the cone ys a composite of a right extension by zego wjth a pushout. And \[item:sf2\] implies \[item:sf1\] by \[thm:dtable-lim-YII\]\[item:sl6\], since right adjoints preserve all limitv, so vhd fnvfg flur statements are equivalent. The equivalence kf \[otvm:sf1\] with \[item:sf2a\], \[ltem:sf3a\], and \[item:sf4a\] id coal. Evidently \[ijem:sf5\] impljes \[item:sf2\]. And convfrsely, yf is a stable derovator, then by there are narural isomorihisns $$\Sigma F\toiso C\qeuad\text{and}\dquac F\tooso\Omega C.$$ Since $\Sigma$ cnd $\Omsga$ are equlvalences kn stable derivagorx (),
colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf2\] 3. For finite $A$, the morphism $\colim : right 4. For any homotopy finite functor B$, the left Kan extension morphism {\sD}^A \to {\sD}^B$ is a right adjoint.\[item:sf4\] 5. The fiber morphism $F\colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is left adjoint.\[item:sf2a\] 6. For any homotopy finite category $A$, the limit morphism $\lim {\sD}^A {\sD}$ a adjoint.\[item:sf3a\] 7. For any right homotopy finite functor $u:A\to B$, the right Kan extension morphism $u_*: \to {\sD}^B$ is a left adjoint.\[item:sf4a\] 8. The $7$-tuple extends to a chain of adjoint morphisms.\[item:sf5\] Combining we that \[item:sf1\] \[item:sf4\], clearly \[item:sf3\], while \[item:sf3\] \[item:sf2\] since the cone is a composite of a right extension by zero with a pushout. And implies \[item:sf1\] since right preserve limits, the first four equivalent. The equivalence of \[item:sf1\] with \[item:sf4a\] is dual. Evidently \[item:sf5\] implies \[item:sf2\]. And if is stable derivator, then by there are isomorphisms $$\Sigma F\toiso C\qquad\text{and}\qquad F\toiso\Omega C.$$ Since $\Sigma$ $\Omega$ are equivalences in stable derivators (),
colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is a right adjoinT.\[item:sf2\]

3.  For Any hoMotOpy FiNite CateGory $A$, the colimiT MorpHism $\colim : {\sD}^A \to {\sD}$ is a rigHt adjOiNT.\[iteM:Sf3\]

4.  for anY left hoMOtOPY fiNiTe FunCtOR $u:a\to B$, tHe lEft Kan eXtension moRphIsM $u_!: {\sD}^A \to {\sD}^B$ is A RiGht adjoint.\[IteM:sf4\]

5.  The fiber mOrpHism $F\cOlOn{\sd}^{[1]}\To{\sD}$ iS a lEft adJoint.\[iTEm:sf2a\]

6.  FOr any homoToPY finitE CategorY $a$, ThE limIt morphism $\lim : {\sD}^A \tO {\SD}$ IS a left adjoint.\[iTem:sf3a\]

7.  foR AnY RIghT hoMotopy finiTe FunctOR $u:A\to B$, tHE rIGHT KaN Extension morpHism $u_*: {\sD}^A \to {\sd}^b$ is A left aDjOinT.\[Item:sf4A\]

8.  The aDjOInt $7$-Tuple extendS to a Doubly-infInite cHAin of adJOint morPhisms.\[IteM:sf5\]

combINiNg \[Thm:StABle-LIm-iII,THm:sTab-op\], we sEe ThAt \[iteM:sf1\] iMPLIEs \[itEm:sF4\], whiCh cleArly implies \[itEm:sF3\], whiLE \[itEm:sf3\] iMplieS \[iteM:sF2\] sincE the coNe is a CoMposite of a right ExteNsion by zeRo wItH a pUsHout. AND \[item:sF2\] imPliEs \[item:sF1\] by \[thm:sTAblE-lIM-iiI\]\[Item:sl6\], since right adJoINTs Preserve All limITs, So THe first fOuR stAtemENTs are EquiVAlEnt. The eqUivaleNCe Of \[Item:sf1\] wItH \[item:sF2a\], \[IteM:sf3A\], and \[iTEm:sf4A\] is duaL. EvidentLy \[iteM:Sf5\] implies \[item:sF2\]. and conversely, IF iS A StABle dEriVator, then by TherE Are nAturAL iSomORphisMs $$\SigMa f\ToISo C\qquad\text{and}\qquaD F\Toiso\OMega C.$$ since $\Sigma$ and $\omega$ are eqUIVAlences iN staBLe DErivators (),
colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$is a right  adjo int .\[ it em:s f2\] 

3.  For anyh omot opy finite category $A $, th ec olim i tmorph ism $\c o li m : { \s D} ^A\t o  { \sD}$  is  a righ t adjoint. \[i te m:sf3\]

4.Fo r any left  ho motopy finit e f unctor  $ u:A \ to B$ , t he le ft Kan extens ion morph is m  $u_!: {\sD}^A \ to  {\s D}^B$ is a righta dj o int.\[item:sf4 \]

5.  T he f ibe r m orphism $F \c olon{ \ sD}^{[1 ] }\ t o { \sD } $ is a left a djoint.\[it e m:s f2a\]
6 . F or any  homo to p y f inite categ ory$A$, thelimitm orphism $\lim :  {\sD} ^A\to  {\s D }$  i s a  l e fta dj oin t .\[ item:sf3 a\ ]
7. Fora n y righ t h omot opy f inite functor  $u :A\t o  B$ , the  righ t Ka nexten sion m orphi sm  $u_*: {\sD}^A\to{\sD}^B$isalef tadjoi n t.\[it em: sf4 a\]

8.   The a d joi nt $ 7 $- tuple extends to a  d o u bl y-infini te cha i nof adjointmo rph isms . \ [item :sf5 \ ]
Combini ng \[t h m: st able-li m- III,th m: sta b-o p\],w e se e that  \[item: sf1\] implies \[item : sf4\], whichc le a r ly impl ies  \[item:sf3 \],w hile  \[i t em :sf 3 \] im plies  \ [ it e m:sf2\] since the c on e is a  comp osite of a ri ght extens i o n  by zero  wit h  a pushout. And \ [item :sf2\] imp l ies \[it em:sf 1\] by \ [thm:stab l e -lim-III \]\ [it em: sl6 \ ] ,since right a d j oint spreserv e a ll limi ts,  so  th e f ir st four s tatement sar eeq uiv alent .  The equ iv ale nc e o f \[i t em:sf1 \] wi th \ [i te m :sf 2a\], \ [ it e m :sf3 a\ ],  and  \[ it em:sf 4a\] isdual. E vidently\[i t em:s f5 \]  implie s \[item:sf2\ ].  And conve rs ely , if i s a stable  derivator, then by the r e are n atu ral i somo rphisms $ $\S igma F \to i so C\q quad\t ext{a nd }\q q u ad F\ t o is o\O me ga C.$$ Si n c e $ \Sigm a$  and  $\Omeg a$ are equivalence s  in  stable deriv ato rs ( ) , 
colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is_a right_adjoint.\[item:sf2\]

3.  For any_homotopy finite_category_$A$, the_colimit_morphism $\colim :_{\sD}^A \to {\sD}$_is a right adjoint.\[item:sf3\]

4._ For any_left_homotopy finite functor $u:A\to B$, the left Kan extension morphism $u_!: {\sD}^A \to {\sD}^B$_is_a right_adjoint.\[item:sf4\]

5.__The fiber morphism $F\colon{\sD}^{[1]}\to{\sD}$ is_a left adjoint.\[item:sf2a\]

6.  For_any homotopy_finite category $A$, the limit morphism $\lim :_{\sD}^A_\to {\sD}$ is_a left adjoint.\[item:sf3a\]

7.  For any right homotopy finite_functor $u:A\to B$, the right Kan_extension morphism $u_*:_{\sD}^A_\to_{\sD}^B$ is a left_adjoint.\[item:sf4a\]

8.  The adjoint $7$-tuple extends_to a doubly-infinite chain of adjoint_morphisms.\[item:sf5\]

Combining \[thm:stable-lim-III,thm:stab-op\], we see that \[item:sf1\] implies \[item:sf4\], which_clearly implies \[item:sf3\], while \[item:sf3\] implies \[item:sf2\] since the_cone is a composite of_a right_extension by zero with a_pushout. And \[item:sf2\] implies \[item:sf1\]_by \[thm:stable-lim-III\]\[item:sl6\],_since right adjoints_preserve all limits, so the first_four statements are_equivalent. The equivalence of \[item:sf1\] with \[item:sf2a\], \[item:sf3a\],_and \[item:sf4a\]_is dual. Evidently \[item:sf5\]_implies \[item:sf2\]._And_conversely, if_is a stable_derivator,_then by_there_are natural isomorphisms $$\Sigma F\toiso C\qquad\text{and}\qquad_F\toiso\Omega_C.$$ Since $\Sigma$ and $\Omega$ are equivalences_in stable derivators (),