fig:etrans\_int\](a) shows the energy transfer for a system with $I=N=10$ in the Mott-insulator phase ($U_0/J_0=40$) for a regular optical lattice ($\Delta_0=0$) in the vicinity of the 1U resonance at the modulation frequency $\omega=U_0$. A detailed analysis of the energy transfer is given in Ref. [@HiSc06].

Additional information can be obtained by a linear response analysis [@ClJa06; @IuCa06; @HiSc06]. To this end, the Hamiltonian is linearized with respect to the modulation amplitude $F$, leading to ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_{\text{lin}}(t) = {{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0+FV_0\sin(\omega t) [\mu{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0-\kappa{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J ]$ with the amplitude $V_0$ of the lattice potential and the couplings $\mu$ and $\kappa$. The first part of the linear term is irrelevant, because it only generates an energy shift. The second part couples the ground state to excited states via the tunneling operator ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J=-J\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\dagger}}_i{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\phantom{\dagger}}}_j$. In a linear response picture, resonant transitions from the ground state ${\,\big|{0}\big> }$ are expected whenever the frequency $\omega$ coincides with the energy $E_{\nu}$ of an excited state ${\,\big|{\nu}\big> }$ with a sizable matrix element ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. This interrelation is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:etrans\_int\](c), where the energy eigenvalues for the first Hubbard band are shown. The vertical lines indicate excited states with sizable matrix elements ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. According to the linear response analysis, the energies of those eigenstates should correspond to the resonance frequencies in the response. The comparison of the resonance energies emerging in the energy transfer in Fig. \[fig:etrans\_int\](a) with these excitation energies in \[fig:etrans\_int\](c) confirms
fig: etrans\_int\](a) shows the energy transfer for a system with $ I = N=10 $ in the Mott - insulator phase ($ U_0 / J_0=40 $) for a even ocular lattice ($ \Delta_0=0 $) in the vicinity of the 1U resonance at the modulation frequency $ \omega = U_0$. A detailed psychoanalysis of the energy transfer is given in Ref. [ @HiSc06 ]. 

 extra data can be obtained by a linear response analysis [ @ClJa06; @IuCa06; @HiSc06 ]. To this end, the Hamiltonian is linearize with respect to the modulation amplitude $ F$, leading to $ { { \hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_{\text{lin}}(t) = { { \hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0+FV_0\sin(\omega t) [ \mu{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0-\kappa{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J ] $ with the amplitude $ V_0 $ of the lattice electric potential and the couplings $ \mu$ and $ \kappa$. The first character of the linear term is irrelevant, because it merely generates an energy shift. The second share couples the ground state to excited state via the tunneling operator $ { { \hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J=-J\sum_{\langle i, j\rangle}{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\dagger}}_i{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\phantom{\dagger}}}_j$. In a linear response picture, resonant conversion from the ground state $ { \,\big|{0}\big > } $ are expected whenever the frequency $ \omega$ coincides with the energy $ E_{\nu}$ of an activated state $ { \,\big|{\nu}\big > } $ with a sizable matrix element $ { \big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big > } $. This interrelation is illustrated in Fig. \[fig: etrans\_int\](c), where the energy eigenvalues for the first Hubbard band are shown. The vertical lines bespeak excited states with goodly matrix chemical element $ { \big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big > } $. According to the linear response psychoanalysis, the energies of those eigenstates should represent to the resonance frequencies in the reception. The comparison of the resonance energies emerging in the energy transfer in Fig. \[fig: etrans\_int\](a) with these excitation energy in \[fig: etrans\_int\](c) confirms
fig:ftrans\_int\](a) shows the enevgy transfer for a systxm with $I=N=10$ in tfe Mott-insulator phase ($U_0/J_0=40$) foc a eegulqr optical lattice ($\Delga_0=0$) in the vicinitt of rhe 1U resoiznce at the mkfulaciin frequency $\okega=U_0$. A dedailed analysiv uf the energy transfer is given in Res. [@HiSc06].

Acdltional informwtiom can be obtained by a linear response znalysiv [@ClJa06; @IuCa06; @HoSc06]. To this end, the Hamiltlniaj is linearized wihh respect jk trw modulation amplitude $F$, leading tk ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_{\text{lin}}(t) = {{\hat{\mathrm{F}}}}_0+FV_0\siu(\omega t) [\mu{{\yar{\mahvrm{H}}}}_0-\kappa{{\hav{\mathri{H}}}}_J ]$ with thc amplidude $V_0$ pf the lattice poventual and the couplings $\mu$ and $\kappa$. The sirst pard kf the linear tern us irtelevdnt, cwcajse iv ohly gejeretes an enedgy shift. Tye second part coupkef the ground sfate tj qxcited states via the tunneling operatmr ${{\gat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J=-J\sum_{\langle i,h\rangle}{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\dagggr}}_i{{\hat{\mathwm{a}}}^{\phantom{\dagger}}}_j$. In a linear response picture, revonanv grauwitiovw vrom the ground state ${\,\big|{0}\big> }$ are expected whqhefeg the frequency $\oiega$ coinciced eyth the energi $E_{\nu}$ oy ah excited state ${\,\bih|{\nu}\big> }$ with a sizablt mattix element ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{Y}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. Nhis interrelation is nllustrated nn Fig. \[fig:eyrans\_int\](c), where the enexgy eifenvalues flr the fidrt Hubbard band xre svown. The vertical lines inqicate exrited states witn sizafle matrix elemctts ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrl{H}}}}_J}\biy|\,{\nu}\bic> }$. Accordijg to the linear response analysis, the energigs mf nhose eigznstatcs should correfpond to the rgsonance yrequevcies in tge respmnse. The coiparison of tvg resonance eiergies eiergung un the dvergy transfer in Fig. \[fpg:ttrans\_int\](a) with these excitabion gnsrgies in \[fig:etxcnw\_int\](c) confirms
fig:etrans\_int\](a) shows the energy transfer for a $I=N=10$ the Mott-insulator ($U_0/J_0=40$) for a the of the 1U at the modulation $\omega=U_0$. A detailed analysis of the transfer is given in Ref. [@HiSc06]. Additional information can be obtained by a response analysis [@ClJa06; @IuCa06; @HiSc06]. To this end, the Hamiltonian is linearized with to modulation $F$, to ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_{\text{lin}}(t) = {{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0+FV_0\sin(\omega t) [\mu{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0-\kappa{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J ]$ with the amplitude $V_0$ of the lattice potential and couplings $\mu$ and $\kappa$. The first part of linear term is irrelevant, it only generates an energy The part couples ground to states via the operator ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J=-J\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\dagger}}_i{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\phantom{\dagger}}}_j$. In a linear response picture, resonant transitions from the ground state ${\,\big|{0}\big> }$ are whenever the coincides with energy of excited state ${\,\big|{\nu}\big> a sizable matrix element ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. illustrated in Fig. \[fig:etrans\_int\](c), where the energy eigenvalues the first band are shown. The vertical lines excited states with sizable matrix elements ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. to the linear response analysis, the energies of those eigenstates should correspond to the resonance the response. The comparison the resonance energies in energy in \[fig:etrans\_int\](a) with excitation energies in \[fig:etrans\_int\](c) confirms
fig:etrans\_int\](a) shows the enerGy transfer For a sYstEm wItH $I=N=10$ iN the mott-insulator pHAse ($U_0/j_0=40$) for a regular optical latTice ($\DElTA_0=0$) in tHE vIciniTy of the 1u ReSONanCe At The MoDUlAtion FreQuency $\oMega=U_0$. A detaIleD aNalysis of the ENeRgy transfeR is Given in Ref. [@Hisc06].

ADditioNaL inFOrmatIon Can be ObtainED by a liNear respoNsE AnalysIS [@ClJa06; @IucA06; @hisc06]. To This end, the HamiltoNIaN Is linearized wiTh respEcT To THE moDulAtion ampliTuDe $F$, leADing to ${{\hAT{\mATHRm{H}}}}_{\TExt{lin}}(t) = {{\hat{\matHrm{H}}}}_0+FV_0\sin(\omEGa t) [\Mu{{\hat{\mAtHrm{h}}}}_0-\Kappa{{\hAt{\matHrM{h}}}}_J ]$ wIth the ampliTude $v_0$ of the latTice poTEntial aND the couPlings $\Mu$ aNd $\kAppa$. tHe FiRst PaRT of THe LinEAr tErm is irrElEvAnt, beCausE IT ONly gEneRateS an enErgy shift. The sEcoNd paRT coUples The grOund StAte to ExciteD statEs Via the tunneling OperAtor ${{\hat{\maThrM{H}}}}_j=-J\sUm_{\LanglE I,j\rangLe}{{\hAt{\mAthrm{a}}}^{\dAgger}}_i{{\hAT{\maThRM{A}}}^{\PhAntom{\dagger}}}_j$. In a linEaR REsPonse picTure, reSOnAnT TransitiOnS frOm thE GRound StatE ${\,\BiG|{0}\big> }$ are eXpecteD WhEnEver the FrEquencY $\oMegA$ coIncidES witH the enErgy $E_{\nu}$ oF an exCIted state ${\,\big|{\nu}\BIg> }$ with a sizablE MaTRIx ELemeNt ${\bIg<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\matHrm{H}}}}_j}\Big|\,{\nU}\big> }$. tHiS inTErrelAtion Is ILlUStrated in Fig. \[fig:etraNs\_Int\](c), whEre thE energy eigenvAlues for thE FIRst HubbaRd baND aRE shown. The vertiCal liNes indicatE Excited sTates With sizaBle matrix ELEments ${\biG<{0}\biG|\,{{{\haT{\maThrM{h}}}}_j}\bIg|\,{\nu}\big> }$. AccordING to tHe Linear rEspOnse anaLysIs, tHe eNerGiEs of those EigenstaTeS sHoUlD coRrespONd to the rEsOnaNcE frEquenCIes in tHe resPonsE. THe COmpArison oF ThE REsonAnCe EnerGieS eMergiNg in THe eNergy trAnsfer in FIg. \[fIG:etrAnS\_iNt\](a) with These excitatiOn Energies in \[FiG:etRans\_inT\](C) Confirms
fig:etrans\_int\](a) shows  the energ y tra nsf erfo r asyst em with $I=N=1 0 $ in  the Mott-insulator ph ase ( $U _ 0/J_ 0 =4 0$) f or a re g ul a r  op ti ca l l at t ic e ($\ Del ta_0=0$ ) in the v ici ni ty of the 1U re sonance at  th e modulation  fr equenc y$\o m ega=U _0$ . A d etaile d  analy sis of th ee nergyt ransfer i sgive n in Ref. [@HiSc0 6 ]. 
Additional in format io n  c a n  be  ob tained byalinea r  respon s ea n a lys i s [@ClJa06; @ IuCa06; @Hi S c06 ]. Toth ise nd, th e Ham il t oni an is linea rize d with re spectt o the m o dulatio n ampl itu de$F$, le ad ing  t o  ${ { \h at{ \ mat hrm{H}}} }_ {\ text{ lin} } ( t )  = { {\h at{\ mathr m{H}}}}_0+FV_ 0\s in(\ o meg a t)[\mu{ {\ha t{ \math rm{H}} }}_0- \k appa{{\hat{\mat hrm{ H}}}}_J ] $ w it h t he  ampl i tude $ V_0 $ o f the l atticep ote nt i a l  a nd the couplings $ \m u $  a nd $\kap pa$. T h efi r st partof  th e li n e ar te rm i s  i rrelevan t, bec a us eit only  g enerat es  an  en ergys hift . Thesecond p art c o uples the grou n d state to ex c it e d  s t ates  vi a the tunne ling oper ator ${ {\h a t{\ma thrm{ H} } }} _ J=-J\sum_{\langle i ,j \rangl e}{{\ hat{\mathrm{a }}}^{\dagg e r } }_i{{\ha t{\m a th r m{a}}}^{\phant om{\d agger}}}_j $ . In a l inear  respons e picture , resonant  tr ans iti ons f ro m the grounds t ate${ \,\big| {0} \big> } $ a reexp ect ed  whenever  the fre qu en cy  $ \om ega$c oincides  w ith  t heenerg y  $E_{\ nu}$of a nex c ite d state ${ \ , \big |{ \n u}\b ig>  } $ wit h as iza ble mat rix eleme nt$ {\bi g< {0 }\big|\ ,{{{\hat{\mat hr m{H}}}}_J} \b ig| \,{\nu } \ big> }$.  This interrelation isi llustra ted  in F ig.\[fig:etr ans \_int\ ](c ) , wher e theenerg yeig e n value s fo r t he  first Hub b a rdbandar e sh own. Th e vertical lines i n dic ate excited s tat es w i t hsiz a bl e  ma tr i x e l e ments ${\big<{0 }\big|\,{{ {\ h at {\mathrm{H } }}} _J }\big|\ ,{\nu}\ big>} $. Acco rding tothe linea rresp o n seanalysis,the ener gies of t h ose e i ge nstat esshould  c orr espon d to t h e r esona nce fr eq uencie s inth e respon se. The comparison of t he res onanc e e nergies e mer g ing  in the e nerg y transfer  in  Fi g. \[ fig : etran s\_i n t\ ](a )  with  the s e excitat i on  en e r gi es in \[fig : e t ran s\_in t\] ( c) con firm s
fig:etrans\_int\](a) shows_the energy_transfer for a system_with $I=N=10$_in_the Mott-insulator_phase_($U_0/J_0=40$) for a_regular optical lattice_($\Delta_0=0$) in the vicinity_of the 1U_resonance_at the modulation frequency $\omega=U_0$. A detailed analysis of the energy transfer is given_in_Ref. [@HiSc06].

Additional_information_can_be obtained by a linear_response analysis [@ClJa06; @IuCa06; @HiSc06]._To this_end, the Hamiltonian is linearized with respect to_the_modulation amplitude $F$,_leading to ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_{\text{lin}}(t) = {{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0+FV_0\sin(\omega t) [\mu{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_0-\kappa{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J ]$ with_the amplitude $V_0$ of the lattice_potential and the_couplings_$\mu$_and $\kappa$. The first_part of the linear term is_irrelevant, because it only generates an_energy shift. The second part couples the_ground state to excited states via_the tunneling operator ${{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J=-J\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\dagger}}_i{{\hat{\mathrm{a}}}^{\phantom{\dagger}}}_j$._In a_linear response picture, resonant transitions_from the ground_state ${\,\big|{0}\big>_}$ are expected_whenever the frequency $\omega$ coincides with_the energy $E_{\nu}$_of an excited state ${\,\big|{\nu}\big> }$_with_a sizable matrix_element_${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big>_}$. This_interrelation is illustrated_in_Fig. \[fig:etrans\_int\](c),_where_the energy eigenvalues for the first_Hubbard_band are shown. The vertical lines indicate_excited states with sizable_matrix_elements ${\big<{0}\big|\,{{{\hat{\mathrm{H}}}}_J}\big|\,{\nu}\big> }$. According_to the linear response analysis,_the energies of those eigenstates should_correspond to_the resonance_frequencies in the response. The comparison of the resonance energies emerging_in the energy transfer in Fig._\[fig:etrans\_int\](a) with these excitation_energies in_\[fig:etrans\_int\](c)_confirms