 corotating-wave interaction. Interestingly, we also find that the two-qubit entanglement of the two-qubit ASRM decreases to zero and never increases again as long as the qubit-oscillator coupling strengths are large enough. Furthermore, the maximum of the two-qubit entanglement in the two-qubit ASRM is far larger than that in the two-qubit SRM, and the two-qubit entanglement mainly appears when the coupling strength of the corotating-wave interaction is bigger than that of the counterrotating-wave interaction.

Acknowledgement
===============

This work is supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China under Grant No. 2012CB921601, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11374054, No. 11305037, No. 11347114, and No. 11247283, the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province under Grant No. 2013J01012, and the funds from Fuzhou University under Grant No. 022513, Grant No. 022408, and Grant No. 600891.

[99]{} I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 49, 324 (1936); 51, 652 (1937). E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963). S. B. Zheng and G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000). B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, *et al.*, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, *et al.*, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013817 (2005); Y. Wu and X. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3086 (1997); X. Yang, Y. Wu, and Y. J. Li, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4545 (1997).

J. Q. You and F. Nori, Physics Today 58,
corotating - wave interaction. Interestingly, we also find that the two - qubit entanglement of the two - qubit ASRM decreases to zero and never increase again equally long as the qubit - oscillator coupling strengths are big enough. Furthermore, the utmost of the two - qubit entanglement in the two - qubit ASRM is far larger than that in the two - qubit SRM, and the two - qubit entanglement chiefly appear when the coupling military capability of the corotating - wave interaction is bigger than that of the counterrotating - wave interaction. 

 Acknowledgement 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 This work is back by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China under Grant No. 2012CB921601, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11374054, No. 11305037, No. 11347114, and No. 11247283, the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province under Grant No. 2013J01012, and the funds from Fuzhou University under Grant No. 022513, Grant No. 022408, and Grant No. 600891. 

 [ 99 ] { } I.   I.   Rabi, Phys. Rev. 49, 324 (1936); 51, 652 (1937). E.   T.   Jaynes and F.   W.   Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963). S.   B.   Zheng and G.   C.   Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000). B.   W.   Shore and P.   L.   Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). S.   Osnaghi, P.   Bertet, A.   Auffeves, * et al. *, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S.   M.   Spillane, T.   J.   Kippenberg, K.   J.   Vahala, * et al. *, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013817 (2005); Y.   Wu and X.   Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3086 (1997); X.   Yang, Y.   Wu, and Y.   J.   Li, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4545 (1997). 

 J.   Q.   You and F.   Nori, Physics Today 58,
 cogotating-wave interaction. Interestingly, cw also find fhat the two-qubit entanglement of thx twi-qubiu ASRM decreases to zero and never ibcreeses again as loif as thc qubjb-oscinoator coupling strengths are large enoggf. Yurthermore, the maximum of the two-qufit entsnhlement in the two-atbit ASRM is far larger than that in tge two-qlbit SRM, and the ywo-qubit entanglement mainpy aopears when the cokpling strebgth if the corotxting-wave puteraction js bigger than that of the coungerrocating-wave unrerwwtion.

Acknowoedgeient
===============

This work is sup[orted ny the Major Sbate Uasix Research Developmenv Program of China ugder Grand Uo. 2012CB921601, the National Narueal Swienwe Fuyndxtikn or Chinw uider Grant Ho. 11374054, No. 11305037, No. 11347114, and No. 11247283, the Naturak Fboence Foundafion os Sujian Province under Grant No. 2013J01012, and tht funss from Fuzhou Universiry under Grant No. 022513, Grwnt No. 022408, agd Grant No. 600891.

[99]{} I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 49, 324 (1936); 51, 652 (1937). E. T. Jaynes and F. F. Cummmnes, Kric. IEDW 51, 89 (1963). S. B. Zheng and G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000). B. W. Shore znc I. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opb. 40, 1195 (1993). S. Osnaghi, P. Beryeh, S. Wuffeves, *et au.*, Phys. Reb. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S. M. Spillaje, T. J. Kikpenbeeg, K. J. Vahaja, *ey al.*, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013817 (2005); Y. Wu and Z. Yang, Phys. Rvv. Lwtt. 78, 3086 (1997); X. Yang, Y. Wu, aud Y. J. Li, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4545 (1997).

K. Q. You and F. Nori, Physics Todzy 58,
corotating-wave interaction. Interestingly, we also find that entanglement the two-qubit decreases to zero long the qubit-oscillator coupling are large enough. the maximum of the two-qubit entanglement the two-qubit ASRM is far larger than that in the two-qubit SRM, and two-qubit entanglement mainly appears when the coupling strength of the corotating-wave interaction is than of counterrotating-wave Acknowledgement =============== This work is supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China Grant No. 2012CB921601, the National Natural Science Foundation China under Grant No. No. 11305037, No. 11347114, and 11247283, Natural Science of Province Grant No. 2013J01012, the funds from Fuzhou University under Grant No. 022513, Grant No. 022408, and Grant No. 600891. [99]{} I. Rabi, 49, 324 51, (1937). T. Jaynes and Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963). and G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, (2000). B. Shore and P. L. Knight, J. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, Auffeves, *et al.*, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, Vahala, *et al.*, Phys. A 71, 013817 Y. and Yang, Rev. Lett. 3086 (1997); X. Yang, Y. Wu, and Y. J. Li, Phys. A 55, 4545 (1997). J. Q. You and F. Nori, 58,
 corotating-wave interaction. interestinGly, we AlsO fiNd That The tWo-qubit entanglEMent Of the two-qubit ASRM decreAses tO zERo anD NeVer inCreases AGaIN As lOnG aS thE qUBiT-osciLlaTor coupLing strengThs ArE large enough. fUrThermore, thE maXimum of the twO-quBit entAnGleMEnt in The Two-quBit ASRm Is far lArger than ThAT in the TWo-qubit srm, aNd thE two-qubit entangleMEnT Mainly appears wHen the CoUPlING stRenGth of the coRoTatinG-Wave intERaCTIOn iS Bigger than thaT of the countERroTating-WaVe iNTeractIon.

AcKnOWleDgement
===============

This Work Is supportEd by thE major StATe Basic researCh DEveLopmENt prOgrAm OF ChINa UndER GrAnt No. 2012CB921601, tHe naTionaL NatURAL scieNce founDatioN of China under graNt No. 11374054, nO. 11305037, No. 11347114, And No. 11247283, The NaTuraL SCiencE FoundAtion Of fujian Province uNder grant No. 2013J01012, aNd tHe FunDs From FUZhou UnIveRsiTy under grant No. 022513, gRanT NO. 022408, AND GRant No. 600891.

[99]{} I. I. Rabi, Phys. ReV. 49, 324 (1936); 51, 652 (1937). E. t. jAyNes and F. W. cumminGS, PRoC. iEEE 51, 89 (1963). S. B. ZhEnG anD G. C. GUO, phys. REv. LeTT. 85, 2392 (2000). B. w. Shore anD P. L. KniGHt, j. MOd. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). S. OSnAghi, P. BErTet, a. AuFfeveS, *Et al.*, phys. ReV. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S. M. SPillaNE, T. J. Kippenberg, K. j. vahala, *et al.*, PhyS. reV. a 71, 013817 (2005); y. WU And X. yanG, Phys. Rev. LetT. 78, 3086 (1997); X. YaNG, Y. Wu, And Y. j. li, phyS. rev. A 55, 4545 (1997).

J. q. You aNd f. noRI, Physics Today 58,
 corotating-wave interacti on. Intere sting ly,  we  a lsofind  that the two- q ubit  entanglement of the t wo-qu bi t  ASR M  d ecrea ses toz er o and  n ev erin c re asesaga in as l ong as the  qu bi t-oscillator co upling str eng ths are larg e e nough.  F urt h ermor e,the m aximum of the  two-qubi te ntangl e ment in t he  two -qubit ASRM is fa r  l a rger than that  in th et wo - q ubi t S RM, and th etwo-q u bit ent a ng l e m ent mainly appear s when thec oup ling s tr eng t h of t he co ro t ati ng-wave int erac tion is b iggert han tha t  of the  count err ota ting - wa ve  in te r act i on .
A ckn owledgem en t===== ==== = = = = ==
Thi s wo rk is  supported by  th e Ma j orState  Basi c Re se archDevelo pment  P rogram of China  und er GrantNo.  2 012 CB 92160 1 , theNat ion al Natu ral Sci e nce  F o u n da tion of China unde rG r an t No. 11 374054 ,  N o. 11305037 ,No.  113 4 7 114,andN o.  1124728 3, the Na tu ral Sci en ce Fou nd ati onof Fu j ianProvin ce under  Gran t  No. 2013J0101 2 , and the fun d sf r om Fuzh ouUniversityunde r  Gra nt N o .022 5 13, G rantNo .  0 2 2408, and Grant No.  6 00891. 

[99 ]{} I. I. Rab i, Phys. R e v .  49, 324  (19 3 6) ;  51, 652 (1937 ). E.  T. Jaynes and F. W . Cum mings, P roc. IEEE 5 1, 89 (1 963 ).S.B.Z h en g and G. C. G u o , Ph ys . Rev.Let t. 85,239 2 ( 200 0).  B . W. Shor e and P.  L .Kn ig ht,  J. M o d. Opt.40 , 1 19 5 ( 1993) .  S. Os naghi , P.  B er t et,  A. Auf f ev e s , *e tal .*,Phy s.  Rev.  Let t . 8 7, 0379 02 (2001) . S .  M.Sp il lane, T . J. Kippenbe rg , K. J. Va ha la,  *et a l . *, Phys.  Rev. A 71, 013817 (200 5 ); Y. W u a nd X.  Yan g, Phys.Rev . Lett . 7 8 , 3086  (1997 ); X.  Y ang , Y. Wu , an d Y .J. Li, Phy s .  Re v. A55 , 45 45 (199 7).

J. Q. You and F.Nori, Physics  To day5 8 ,
 corotating-wave_interaction. Interestingly,_we also find that_the two-qubit_entanglement_of the_two-qubit_ASRM decreases to_zero and never_increases again as long_as the qubit-oscillator_coupling_strengths are large enough. Furthermore, the maximum of the two-qubit entanglement in the two-qubit_ASRM_is far_larger_than_that in the two-qubit SRM,_and the two-qubit entanglement mainly_appears when_the coupling strength of the corotating-wave interaction is_bigger_than that of_the counterrotating-wave interaction.

Acknowledgement
===============

This work is supported by the Major_State Basic Research Development Program of_China under Grant_No._2012CB921601,_the National Natural Science_Foundation of China under Grant No._11374054, No. 11305037, No. 11347114, and_No. 11247283, the Natural Science Foundation of_Fujian Province under Grant No. 2013J01012,_and the funds from Fuzhou_University under_Grant No. 022513, Grant No._022408, and Grant_No. 600891.

[99]{}_I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev._49, 324 (1936); 51, 652 (1937)._E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings,_Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963). S. B. Zheng_and_G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev._Lett._85,_2392 (2000)._B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight,_J._Mod. Opt._40,_1195 (1993). S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, *et_al.*,_Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). S. M. Spillane,_T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, *et al.*,_Phys._Rev. A 71, 013817_(2005); Y. Wu and X. Yang, Phys._Rev. Lett. 78, 3086 (1997); X. Yang,_Y. Wu, and_Y. J. Li, Phys._Rev. A 55, 4545 (1997).

J. Q. You and F. Nori, Physics Today 58,