 $\sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now assume $\Lambda_j(\zeta):=(f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta))$ where $f_j$, $g_j$ are holomorphic on $\mathbb{D}$ and continuous up to the boundary of $\mathbb{D}$. Furthermore, $$\Gamma_j=\{e^{i\theta}\Lambda_j:\theta\in [0,2\pi]\}.$$ Then, there exists $f,g$ so that $$\sup\{\text{dist}(((f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta)), f(\zeta),g(\zeta))):\zeta\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}\}\rightarrow 0$$ as $j\rightarrow \infty$. Therefore, one can show $f_j\rightarrow f$ and $g_j\rightarrow g$ uniformly on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ as $j\rightarrow \infty$. So $f$ and $g$ are holomorphic on $\mathbb{D}$ and continuous on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$. To show $f$ and $g$ are constant it suffices to show they are constant on some open subset of $\mathbb{D}$. Assume $f$ is not identically constant. If $g$ is constant then by open mapping theorem, $F(\mathbb{D})$ is open in $\mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{R}$ and also $\sigma(F(\mathbb{D}))=0$, which cannot occur by the open mapping theorem. So, we assume both $F$ and $g$ are not identically constant, so the zeros of $f'$ and $g'$ have no accumulation point in $\mathbb{D}$. Then by a holomorphic change of coordinates, there exists an open simply connected set $D\subset \mathbb{D}$ so that $F(D)$ is biholomorphic to a subset $K$ of $\{z_1\in \mathbb{C}\}\times\{0\}$. Hence again by the open mapping theorem, $f$ is constant on $K$ since $K$ has measure zero and so $f$ is constant on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ by the identity principle.

\[lembiholo\] Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{C}^2$ be a bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domain with a smooth boundary. Suppose $f:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$ and $g:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$
$ \sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now assume $ \Lambda_j(\zeta):=(f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta))$ where $ f_j$, $ g_j$ are holomorphic on $ \mathbb{D}$ and continuous up to the boundary of $ \mathbb{D}$. Furthermore, $ $ \Gamma_j=\{e^{i\theta}\Lambda_j:\theta\in [ 0,2\pi]\}.$$ Then, there exists $ f, g$ so that $ $ \sup\{\text{dist}(((f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta) ), f(\zeta),g(\zeta))):\zeta\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}\}\rightarrow 0$$ as $ j\rightarrow \infty$. consequently, one can picture $ f_j\rightarrow f$ and $ g_j\rightarrow g$ uniformly on $ \overline{\mathbb{D}}$ as $ j\rightarrow \infty$. So $ f$ and $ g$ are holomorphic on $ \mathbb{D}$ and continuous on $ \overline{\mathbb{D}}$. To show $ f$ and $ g$ are changeless it suffice to show they are constant on some open subset of $ \mathbb{D}$. Assume $ f$ is not identically changeless. If $ g$ is constant then by open function theorem, $ F(\mathbb{D})$ is loose in $ \mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{R}$ and also $ \sigma(F(\mathbb{D}))=0 $, which cannot happen by the open mapping theorem. So, we assume both $ F$ and $ g$ are not identically changeless, so the zeros of $ f'$ and $ g'$ have no accumulation point in $ \mathbb{D}$. Then by a holomorphic change of coordinate, there exists an open simply associate set $ D\subset \mathbb{D}$ so that $ F(D)$ is biholomorphic to a subset $ K$ of $ \{z_1\in \mathbb{C}\}\times\{0\}$. Hence again by the overt mapping theorem, $ f$ is changeless on $ K$ since $ K$ has measure zero and so $ f$ is constant on $ \overline{\mathbb{D}}$ by the identity principle. 

 \[lembiholo\ ] Let $ \Omega\subset \mathbb{C}^2 $ be a restrict pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domain with a smooth boundary. Suppose $ f:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$ and $ g:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$
 $\sihma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now assume $\Lambaa_j(\zeta):=(f_j(\zeta),g_j(\eera))$ whece $f_j$, $g_n$ are houomorphic on $\mathbb{D}$ and convinuius uk to the boundary ow $\mathbb{D}$. Furthernore, $$\Tamma_j=\{e^{i\thxfa}\Lambda_j:\thetz\ln [0,2\pi]\}.$$ Vhen, there exisjs $f,g$ so thad $$\sup\{\text{dist}(((f_b(\zdtc),g_j(\zeta)), f(\zeta),g(\zeta))):\zeta\in \overline{\matrbb{D}}\}\rigntwrrow 0$$ as $j\rigrtargor \inrny$. Therefore, one can show $f_j\riggtarrow f$ and $g_j\righyarrow g$ uniformly on $\overpine{\lathbb{D}}$ as $j\rightagrow \infty$. Wo $f$ qnd $g$ are houomorphic on $\mathbb{D}$ ahd continuous on $\overline{\mathbb{A}}$. To xhow $f$ and $g$ arf constant iv suffpces to show bney ara constsnt on some opcn suuset of $\mathbb{D}$. Assume $f$ ms not identically cjnstant. Ix $y$ is constant then by open mdppitg tfwordm, $R(\methgb{D})$ is opxn in $\mathbg{C}\times \matybb{R}$ and also $\sigma(G(\mwnnbb{D}))=0$, which cznnot jcsur by the open mapping theorem. So, we avsuje both $F$ and $g$ are not identically constant, so the zqros of $f'$ and $g'$ have no accumulation point in $\matvbb{D}$. Vhdn yn x hllomorphic change of coordinates, there exists zn oien simply connecbed set $D\subset \mayhhb{C}$ so that $F(D)$ ir biholomkrphic to a subset $K$ of $\{z_1\yn \marhbb{C}\}\timef\{0\}$. Hemce again by the open mappibg theorem, $f$ us constant on $K$ snnce $K$ has mzasure zero and so $f$ is constant ou $\overmine{\mathbb{D}}$ by the isdntity principle.

\[uemnihmlo\] Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{S}^2$ be a bonnded pseudozonvgx compjete Reinhwrdt domain with a smootj bouudary. Suppose $f:\lathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$ and $g:\mevhbb{D}\rightarrpw b\Okega$
$\sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now assume $\Lambda_j(\zeta):=(f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta))$ where $f_j$, $g_j$ on and continuous to the boundary Then, exists $f,g$ so $$\sup\{\text{dist}(((f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta)), f(\zeta),g(\zeta))):\zeta\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}\}\rightarrow as $j\rightarrow \infty$. Therefore, one can $f_j\rightarrow f$ and $g_j\rightarrow g$ uniformly on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ as $j\rightarrow \infty$. So $f$ $g$ are holomorphic on $\mathbb{D}$ and continuous on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$. To show $f$ and are it to they are constant on some open subset of $\mathbb{D}$. Assume $f$ is not identically constant. If is constant then by open mapping theorem, $F(\mathbb{D})$ open in $\mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{R}$ also $\sigma(F(\mathbb{D}))=0$, which cannot occur the mapping theorem. we both and $g$ are identically constant, so the zeros of $f'$ and $g'$ have no accumulation point in $\mathbb{D}$. Then by holomorphic change there exists open connected $D\subset \mathbb{D}$ so is biholomorphic to a subset $K$ Hence again by the open mapping theorem, $f$ constant on since $K$ has measure zero and $f$ is constant on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ by the identity \[lembiholo\] Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{C}^2$ be a bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domain with a smooth boundary. b\Omega$ and $g:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$
 $\sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now assume $\Lambda_J(\zeta):=(f_j(\zetA),g_j(\zeTa))$ wHerE $f_J$, $g_j$ aRe hoLomorphic on $\matHBb{D}$ aNd continuous up to the bouNdary Of $\MAthbB{d}$. FUrtheRmore, $$\GaMMa_J=\{E^{I\thEtA}\LAmbDa_J:\ThEta\in [0,2\Pi]\}.$$ THen, therE exists $f,g$ sO thAt $$\Sup\{\text{dist}(((f_J(\ZeTa),g_j(\zeta)), f(\zEta),G(\zeta))):\zeta\in \oVerLine{\maThBb{D}}\}\RIghtaRroW 0$$ as $j\rIghtarROw \inftY$. ThereforE, oNE can shOW $f_j\righTARrOw f$ aNd $g_j\rightarrow g$ unIFoRMly on $\overline{\mAthbb{D}}$ As $J\RiGHTarRow \Infty$. So $f$ anD $g$ Are hoLOmorphiC On $\MATHbb{d}$ And continuous On $\overline{\mAThbB{D}}$. To shOw $F$ anD $G$ are coNstanT iT SufFices to show They Are constaNt on soME open suBSet of $\maThbb{D}$. ASsuMe $f$ Is noT IdEnTicAlLY coNStAnt. iF $g$ iS constanT tHeN by opEn maPPING theOreM, $F(\maThbb{D})$ Is open in $\mathbB{C}\tImes \MAthBb{R}$ anD also $\SigmA(F(\MathbB{D}))=0$, whicH cannOt Occur by the open mAppiNg theorem. so, wE aSsuMe Both $F$ ANd $g$ are Not IdeNticallY constaNT, so ThE ZERoS of $f'$ and $g'$ have no accuMuLATiOn point iN $\mathbB{d}$. THeN By a holomOrPhiC chaNGE of coOrdiNAtEs, there eXists aN OpEn Simply cOnNected SeT $D\sUbsEt \matHBb{D}$ sO that $F(d)$ is biholOmorpHIc to a subset $K$ of $\{Z_1\In \mathbb{C}\}\timeS\{0\}$. heNCE aGAin bY thE open mappinG theORem, $f$ Is coNStAnt ON $K$ sinCe $K$ haS mEAsURe zero and so $f$ is constAnT on $\oveRline{\Mathbb{D}}$ by the iDentity priNCIPle.

\[lembiHolo\] lEt $\oMega\subset \mathBb{C}^2$ be A bounded psEUdoconveX compLete ReinHardt domaIN With a smoOth BouNdaRy. SUPPoSe $f:\mathbb{D}\rigHTArroW b\omega$ anD $g:\mAthbb{D}\rIghTarRow B\OmEgA$
 $\sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$. Now  assume $\ Lambd a_j (\z et a):= (f_j (\zeta),g_j(\z e ta)) $ where $f_j$, $g_j$ a re ho lo m orph i con $\ mathbb{ D }$ a ndco nt inu ou s  u p tothe  bounda ry of $\ma thb b{ D}$. Further m or e, $$\Gamm a_j =\{e^{i\thet a}\ Lambda _j :\t h eta\i n [ 0,2\p i]\}.$ $  Then,  there ex is t s $f,g $  so tha t $$ \sup \{\text{dist}(((f _ j( \ zeta),g_j(\zet a)), f (\ z et a ) ,g( \ze ta))):\zet a\ in \o v erline{ \ ma t h b b{D } }\}\rightarro w 0$$ as $j \ rig htarro w\in f ty$. T heref or e , o ne can show  $f_ j\rightar row f$ and $g_ j \righta rrow g $ u nif orml y  o n$\o ve r lin e {\ mat h bb{ D}}$ as$j \r ighta rrow \ i n fty$ . S o $f $ and  $g$ are holo mor phic on$\mat hbb{D }$ a nd  cont inuous  on $ \o verline{\mathbb {D}} $. To sho w $ f$  an d$g$ a r e cons tan t i t suffi ces tos how  t h e y  a re constant on som eo p en  subsetof $\m a th bb { D}$. Ass um e $ f$ i s not i dent i ca lly cons tant.I f$g $ is co ns tant t he n b y o pen m a ppin g theo rem, $F( \math b b{D})$ is open in $\mathbb{C } \t i m es \mat hbb {R}$ and al so $ \ sigm a(F( \ ma thb b {D})) =0$,wh i ch cannot occur by the  o pen ma pping  theorem. So,  we assume b o th $F$ a nd $ g $a re not identic allyconstant,s o the ze ros o f $f'$ a nd $g'$ h a v e no acc umu lat ion  po i n tin $\mathbb{D } $ . Th en  by a h olo morphic  ch ang e o f c oo rdinates,  there e xi st san  op en si m ply conn ec ted  s et$D\su b set \m athbb {D}$  s ot hat  $F(D)$ is b ihol om or phic  to  a  subs et $ K $ o f $\{z_ 1\in \mat hbb { C}\} \t im es\{0\} $. Hence agai nby the ope nmap ping t h e orem, $f $ is constant on $K$ si n ce $K$has  meas urezero andso$f$ is  co n stanton $\o verli ne {\m a t hbb{D } } $byth e identity p rin ciple .
\[l embihol o\] Let $\Omega\su b set  \mathbb{C}^2 $ b e ab o un ded ps e udo co n vex c omplete Reinhar dt domainwi t ha smooth b o und ar y. Supp ose $f: \math b b{D}\ri ghtarrowb\Omega$an d $g : \ mat hbb{D}\rig htarrowb\Omega$
 $\sigma(\Gamma_0)=0$._Now assume_$\Lambda_j(\zeta):=(f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta))$ where $f_j$, $g_j$_are holomorphic_on_$\mathbb{D}$ and_continuous_up to the_boundary of $\mathbb{D}$._Furthermore, $$\Gamma_j=\{e^{i\theta}\Lambda_j:\theta\in [0,2\pi]\}.$$ Then,_there exists $f,g$_so_that $$\sup\{\text{dist}(((f_j(\zeta),g_j(\zeta)), f(\zeta),g(\zeta))):\zeta\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}\}\rightarrow 0$$ as $j\rightarrow \infty$. Therefore, one can show $f_j\rightarrow f$_and_$g_j\rightarrow g$_uniformly_on_$\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ as $j\rightarrow \infty$. So_$f$ and $g$ are holomorphic_on $\mathbb{D}$_and continuous on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$. To show $f$ and_$g$_are constant it_suffices to show they are constant on some open_subset of $\mathbb{D}$. Assume $f$ is_not identically constant._If_$g$_is constant then by_open mapping theorem, $F(\mathbb{D})$ is open_in $\mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{R}$ and also $\sigma(F(\mathbb{D}))=0$,_which cannot occur by the open mapping_theorem. So, we assume both $F$_and $g$ are not identically_constant, so_the zeros of $f'$ and_$g'$ have no_accumulation point_in $\mathbb{D}$. Then_by a holomorphic change of coordinates,_there exists an_open simply connected set $D\subset \mathbb{D}$_so_that $F(D)$ is_biholomorphic_to_a subset_$K$ of $\{z_1\in_\mathbb{C}\}\times\{0\}$._Hence again_by_the open mapping theorem, $f$ is_constant_on $K$ since $K$ has measure zero_and so $f$ is_constant_on $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ by the_identity principle.

\[lembiholo\] Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{C}^2$_be a bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt_domain with_a smooth_boundary. Suppose $f:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$ and $g:\mathbb{D}\rightarrow b\Omega$