 possible enhancing the cross section of photoexcitation by switching from VP to HP (3$d$ bands) and exploiting the 4$d \rightarrow$ 4$f$ Fano resonance (4$f$ states). Respective PE maps are shown in Fig. \[ResPES\]. In the topmost map, taken with VP at *h*$\nu$=112eV bands $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ are of comparable intensity, reflecting their Fe 3$d_{xz, yz}$ and 3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ character. Switching to *h*$\nu$=121eV the intensity of bands $A_1$ and $A_2$ becomes essentially larger as compared to that of band $B$. This is caused by resonant enhancement of partial 4$f$ admixtures to the former bands. Especially the intensity of band $A_1$ grows strongly between 0.1eV BE and the Fermi level, supporting the former assumption about the hybridization with Ce 4$f$ states. In addition two other features appear: ([*i*]{}) a peak directly at $E_F$ that reflects the Ce 4$f^1$ final state and ([*ii*]{}) a further band with its top at about 0.1eV BE, labeled $C$. Finally, at HP and *h*$\nu$=121eV (Fig. \[ResPES\] bottom), band $C$ appears extremely enhanced, indicating its predominant 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$ character. Thus, its visibility at 121eV and VP is only due to finite Ce 4$f$ admixtures. Band $A_3$, on the other hand, is still not observed.

In the results of our calculations \[see Fig. \[ARPES\](d)\] the Fe 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$-derived band at 0.33eV BE corresponds to band $C$, but the calculated band has higher BE as compared to the experiment due to well known overestimation of the 4$f$-VB interaction obtained with LDA. In Fig. \[ARPES\](c) this band is absent (the respective subsurface Fe 3$d$ states form band $A_3$), however, a similar band \[small dots in Fig. \[ARPES\] (c)\] is found at 0.25eV BE which is derived from the Fe 3$d$ states
possible enhancing the cross section of photoexcitation by switch from VP to HP (3$d$ band) and exploiting the 4$d \rightarrow$ 4$f$ Fano resonance (4$f$ states). Respective PE function are shown in Fig.   \[ResPES\ ]. In the topmost map, take with VP at * h*$\nu$=112eV bands $ A_1 $, $ A_2 $ and $ B$ are of comparable intensity, reflect their Fe 3$d_{xz, yz}$ and 3$d_{x^2 - y^2}$ character. Switching to * h*$\nu$=121eV the saturation of bands $ A_1 $ and $ A_2 $ becomes basically larger as compared to that of band $ B$. This is caused by resonant enhancement of partial 4$f$ admixtures to the erstwhile bands. Especially the intensity of ring $ A_1 $ grows strongly between 0.1eV BE and the Fermi level, support the former assumption about the hybridization with Ce 4$f$ states. In addition two other feature appear: ([ * i * ] { }) a peak directly at $ E_F$ that reflects the Ce 4$f^1 $ final department of state and ([ * ii * ] { }) a further band with its top at about 0.1eV BE, labeled $ C$. Finally, at HP and * h*$\nu$=121eV (Fig.   \[ResPES\ ] bottom), band $ C$ appears extremely enhanced, bespeak its predominant 3$d_{3z^2 - r^2}$ character. therefore, its visibility at 121eV and VP is merely ascribable to finite Ce 4$f$ admixtures. Band $ A_3 $, on the other hand, is still not observed. 

 In the results of our calculations \[see Fig.   \[ARPES\](d)\ ] the Fe 3$d_{3z^2 - r^2}$-derived band at 0.33eV beryllium corresponds to band $ C$, but the calculated band has higher BE as compared to the experiment due to well known overestimation of the 4$f$-VB interaction obtained with LDA. In Fig.   \[ARPES\](c) this band is absent (the respective subsurface Fe 3$d$ country form set $ A_3 $), however, a similar band \[small dots in Fig.   \[ARPES\ ] (c)\ ] is found at 0.25eV BE which is derive from the Fe 3$d$ states
 podsible enhancing the crors section of pkitoexcmtation by switzhing from VP to HP (3$d$ bands) end wxplouting the 4$d \rightarrow$ 4$f$ Fano rvsonance (4$d$ stetes). Respective 'S maps are shkan iu Hig. \[ResPES\]. In thg topmost ma[, taken with V[ xt *h*$\nu$=112eV bands $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ are of compawable imtfnsity, reflectyng uheyr Fs 3$d_{xz, yz}$ and 3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ character. Switchihg to *h*$\iu$=121eV the intensoty of bands $A_1$ and $A_2$ becomfs edsentially larger ws compared to eyat of band $C$. This is bcused by reaonant enhancement of partial 4$f$ admirtures to tye fogker bands. Ewpeciwlly the intcmsity mf band $A_1$ grows stronnly bxtwewn 0.1eV BE and the Fermm level, supporting tre former aasumption about tye hybrhdizdtiov wigh De 4$f$ stated. Ii addition fwo other fwatures appear: ([*i*]{}) a keah directly at $S_F$ thae weflects the Ce 4$f^1$ final state and ([*ii*]{}) a xurfher band with its top qt about 0.1eV BE, labelef $C$. Finaljy, at HP and *h*$\nu$=121eV (Fig. \[ResPES\] bottom), band $C$ appearv extceoelv enhavxef, indicating its predominant 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$ character. Thta, otx visibility ab 121eV and VP is onlu fur to finite Ce 4$f$ admnsthres. Band $A_3$, on the other rand, us still got pbserved.

In the results of oyr calculatijbs \[see Fig. \[ARPES\](d)\] tke Fe 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$-dernved bsnd ay 0.33eV BE corresponds to yand $C$, but the capculated gxnd has higher BD ax wompared to the experiment due to wxll kuown ovefestomatiog of the 4$f$-GB inbaraction obtained aith PDD. In Fig. \[AROES\](c) this band is absent (the respective subsutfawe Xe 3$d$ staces fovm band $A_3$), howevqr, a similar bcnd \[smalj dotr in Fig. \[ARIES\] (c)\] is hound at 0.25eV FE which is datived from thx Fe 3$d$ stwtes
possible enhancing the cross section of photoexcitation from to HP bands) and exploiting resonance states). Respective PE are shown in \[ResPES\]. In the topmost map, taken VP at *h*$\nu$=112eV bands $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ are of comparable intensity, reflecting Fe 3$d_{xz, yz}$ and 3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ character. Switching to *h*$\nu$=121eV the intensity of bands and becomes larger compared to that of band $B$. This is caused by resonant enhancement of partial 4$f$ admixtures the former bands. Especially the intensity of band grows strongly between 0.1eV and the Fermi level, supporting former about the with 4$f$ In addition two features appear: ([*i*]{}) a peak directly at $E_F$ that reflects the Ce 4$f^1$ final state and ([*ii*]{}) further band top at 0.1eV labeled Finally, at HP (Fig. \[ResPES\] bottom), band $C$ appears its predominant 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$ character. Thus, its visibility at and VP only due to finite Ce 4$f$ Band $A_3$, on the other hand, is still observed. In the results of our calculations \[see Fig. \[ARPES\](d)\] the Fe 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$-derived band at corresponds to band $C$, the calculated band higher as to experiment due well known overestimation of the 4$f$-VB interaction obtained with LDA. In \[ARPES\](c) this band is absent (the respective subsurface Fe 3$d$ band however, a similar \[small dots in Fig. (c)\] found at 0.25eV BE derived the
 possible enhancing the cross Section of pHotoeXciTatIoN by sWitcHing from VP to HP (3$D$ BandS) and exploiting the 4$d \righTarroW$ 4$f$ fAno rESoNance (4$F$ states). rEsPECtiVe pE MapS aRE sHown iN FiG. \[ResPES\]. in the topmoSt mAp, Taken with VP aT *H*$\nU$=112eV bands $A_1$, $A_2$ And $b$ are of comparAblE intenSiTy, rEFlectIng Their fe 3$d_{xz, yZ}$ And 3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ Character. swITching TO *h*$\nu$=121eV tHE InTensIty of bands $A_1$ and $A_2$ beCOmES essentially laRger as CoMPaRED to ThaT of band $B$. ThIs Is cauSEd by resONaNT ENhaNCement of partiAl 4$f$ admixturES to The forMeR baNDs. EspeCiallY tHE inTensity of baNd $A_1$ gRows stronGly betWEen 0.1eV BE ANd the FeRmi levEl, sUppOrtiNG tHe ForMeR AssUMpTioN AboUt the hybRiDiZatioN witH cE 4$F$ StatEs. IN addItion Two other featuRes AppeAR: ([*i*]{}) a Peak dIrectLy at $e_F$ That rEflectS the CE 4$f^1$ Final state and ([*ii*]{}) A furTher band wIth ItS toP aT abouT 0.1EV BE, laBelEd $C$. finally, At HP and *H*$\Nu$=121ev (FIG. \[rEspES\] bottom), band $C$ appeArS EXtRemely enHanced, INdIcATing its pReDomInanT 3$D_{3Z^2-r^2}$ chaRactER. THus, its viSibiliTY aT 121ev and VP iS oNly due To FinIte ce 4$f$ adMIxtuRes. BanD $A_3$, on the oTher hANd, is still not obSErved.

In the resULtS OF oUR calCulAtions \[see FiG. \[ARPes\](d)\] thE Fe 3$d_{3Z^2-R^2}$-dEriVEd banD at 0.33eV bE COrREsponds to band $C$, but thE cAlculaTed baNd has higher BE As compared TO THe experiMent DUe TO well known overEstimAtion of the 4$F$-vB interaCtion Obtained With LDA. In fIG. \[ARPES\](c) tHis BanD is AbsENT (tHe respective sUBSurfAcE Fe 3$d$ staTes Form banD $A_3$), hOweVer, A siMiLar band \[smAll dots iN FIg. \[aRpEs\] (c)\] iS founD At 0.25eV BE whIcH is DeRivEd froM The Fe 3$d$ StateS
 possible enhancing the cr oss sectio n ofpho toe xc itat ionby switching f r om V P to HP (3$d$ bands) a nd ex pl o itin g  t he 4$ d \righ t ar r o w$4$ f$  Fa no re sonan ce(4$f$ s tates). Re spe ct ive PE mapsa re  shown inFig . \[ResPES\] . I n theto pmo s t map , t akenwith V P  at *h *$\nu$=11 2e V  bands $A_1$,$ A _2 $ an d $B$ are of comp a ra b le intensity,reflec ti n gt h eir  Fe  3$d_{xz,yz }$ an d  3$d_{x ^ 2- y ^ 2 }$c haracter. Swi tching to * h *$\ nu$=12 1e V t h e inte nsity  o f  ba nds $A_1$ a nd $ A_2$ beco mes es s entiall y  larger  as co mpa red  tot ha tofba n d $ B $.  Th i s i s caused  b yreson ante n h a ncem ent  ofparti al 4$f$ admix tur es t o  th e for mer b ands .Espec iallythe i nt ensity of band$A_1 $ grows s tro ng lybe tween 0.1eVBEand  the Fe rmi lev e l,su p p o rt ing the former ass um p t io n aboutthe hy b ri di z ation wi th  Ce  4$f $ state s. I n  a dditiontwo ot h er  f eatures  a ppear:  ( [*i *]{ }) ap eakdirect ly at $E _F$ t h at reflects th e  Ce 4$f^1$ fi n al s ta t e an d ( [*ii*]{}) a  fur t herband wi thi ts to p atab o ut 0.1eV BE, labeled $ C$ . Fina lly,at HP and *h* $\nu$=121e V ( Fig. \[R esPE S \] bottom), band$C$ a ppears ext r emely en hance d, indic ating its p redomina nt3$d _{3 z^2 - r ^2 }$ character. T hus,  i ts visi bil ity at121 eVand  VP  i s only du e to fin it eCe  4 $f$  admi x tures. B an d $ A_ 3$,  on t h e othe r han d, i sst i llnot obs e rv e d .

I nth e re sul ts  of o ur c a lcu lations  \[see Fi g.\ [ARP ES \] (d)\] t he Fe 3$d_{3z ^2 -r^2}$-der iv edband a t 0.33eV B E corresponds to band $ C $, butthe  calc ulat ed band h ashigher  BE as com paredto th eexp e r iment d ue  to  w ell knowno v ere stima ti on o f the 4 $f$-VB interaction obt ained with LD A.In F i g .\[A R PE S \]( c) thi s band is absent(the respe ct i ve  subsurfac e  Fe  3 $d$ sta tes for m ban d  $A_3$) , however , a simil ar  ban d \[s mall dotsin Fig.\[ARPES\] (c)\] is  foun d a t 0.25 eV  BE  whic h is d e riv ed fr om the  F e 3$d$  stat es 
 possible_enhancing the_cross section of photoexcitation_by switching_from_VP to_HP_(3$d$ bands) and_exploiting the 4$d_\rightarrow$ 4$f$ Fano resonance_(4$f$ states). Respective_PE_maps are shown in Fig. \[ResPES\]. In the topmost map, taken with VP at *h*$\nu$=112eV_bands_$A_1$, $A_2$_and_$B$_are of comparable intensity, reflecting_their Fe 3$d_{xz, yz}$ and_3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ character._Switching to *h*$\nu$=121eV the intensity of bands $A_1$_and_$A_2$ becomes essentially_larger as compared to that of band $B$. This_is caused by resonant enhancement of_partial 4$f$ admixtures_to_the_former bands. Especially the_intensity of band $A_1$ grows strongly_between 0.1eV BE and the Fermi_level, supporting the former assumption about the_hybridization with Ce 4$f$ states. In_addition two other features appear:_([*i*]{}) a_peak directly at $E_F$ that_reflects the Ce_4$f^1$ final_state and ([*ii*]{})_a further band with its top_at about 0.1eV_BE, labeled $C$. Finally, at HP_and_*h*$\nu$=121eV (Fig. \[ResPES\] bottom),_band_$C$_appears extremely_enhanced, indicating its_predominant_3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$ character._Thus,_its visibility at 121eV and VP_is_only due to finite Ce 4$f$ admixtures._Band $A_3$, on the_other_hand, is still not_observed.

In the results of our_calculations \[see Fig. \[ARPES\](d)\] the Fe 3$d_{3z^2-r^2}$-derived_band at_0.33eV BE_corresponds to band $C$, but the calculated band has higher BE_as compared to the experiment due_to well known overestimation_of the_4$f$-VB_interaction obtained with_LDA._In Fig. \[ARPES\](c)_this band is absent (the respective subsurface_Fe 3$d$_states form band $A_3$), however, a_similar band \[small dots_in_Fig. \[ARPES\] (c)\] is found at 0.25eV_BE which is derived from the_Fe 3$d$ states