 course of $N_n$ nights may be broken up into four different regimes.

First, if the average number of transits during the total time during which the target star is observed exceeds $N_{tr,min}$, then it is statistically “certain” that the transit will occur during the times of observation.

Second, it may be that the entire length of the survey is long enough that there are at least $N_{tr,min}$ transits, but that during the total time spent observing the average number of transits is less than that required for detection. Then one is not certain to detect $N_{tr,min}$ transits, and there is a decreasing window probability (for increasing planet period).

Third, one may have $N_{tr,min}$ transits during an observing run, but only if the first transit occurs sufficiently early during that particular run. The probability of detecting the system then decreases at an even greater rate as the orbital period increases.

Finally, the orbital period of system may be so great that there is no possible way in which one could see the minimum number of transits required for a detection, and $P_{window}=0$. Mathematically then, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:510}
P_{window} &=& 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{ for } 1 \leq \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}},\\
&=& \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}\right)^2\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{ for } \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}} < 1 \leq \frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}}{N_{tr,min}P}, \nonumber \\
&=& \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}\right)^2 \left(\frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}-(N_{tr,min}-1)P}{P}\right)^\frac{1}{2} \nonumber \\
&\ &\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox
course of $ N_n$ nights may be broken up into four different government. 

 foremost, if the average number of passage during the full time during which the target star topology is observe exceed $ N_{tr, min}$, then it is statistically “ certain ” that the transit will happen during the times of observation. 

 Second, it may be that the entire length of the sketch is long enough that there are at least $ N_{tr, min}$ transits, but that during the total time spent observe the average number of transits is less than that want for detection. Then one is not certain to detect $ N_{tr, min}$ transits, and there is a decrease window probability (for increasing planet period). 

 Third, one may have $ N_{tr, min}$ passage during an observing run, but only if the first transit occurs sufficiently early during that particular run. The probability of detecting the system then decreases at an even greater rate as the orbital period increases. 

 Finally, the orbital time period of system may be so big that there is no possible way in which one could see the minimal number of passage required for a detection, and $ P_{window}=0$. Mathematically then, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq:510 } 
 P_{window } & = & 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox { for } 1 \leq \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr, min}},\\ 
 & = & \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr, min}}\right)^2\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox { for } \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr, min } } < 1 \leq \frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}}{N_{tr, min}P }, \nonumber \\ 
 & = & \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr, min}}\right)^2 \left(\frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}-(N_{tr, min}-1)P}{P}\right)^\frac{1}{2 } \nonumber \\ 
 & \ & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox
 cokrse of $N_n$ nights may be broken up into four dmfferenf regimer.

First, if the average number od trabsits during the total time durpng which the rarget stac is obscxved swceedv $N_{tr,min}$, then ij is statisthcally “certain” tfac the transit will occur during the eimes og lbservation.

Secjnd, pt may be that the entire length of the aurvey ps long enough thst there are at least $N_{tr,mln}$ tgansits, but that dkring the tital rime spent ocserving the average nomber of transits is less than tfat rzquired for dwtefjion. Then onx is njt certain to detect $N_{tr,min}$ transits, and bhere is a decreasing window 'robability (for incrgasing platec period).

Third, one may hqve $N_{jr,min}$ travwitr dhrmng an obderting run, buf only if tye first transit ocvuww sufficientlg earlr quring that particular run. The probabilpty kf detecting the system then decreases at an even grewter rate as the orbital period increases.

Finally, dhe ocbktao ieriue lf system may be so great that there is no pofainlv way in which onc could see the mimiluk number of trxnsits resuired for a detechion, anq $P_{wibdow}=0$. Mathtmativally then, $$\begin{aligned}
\labeo{eq:510}
P_{window} &=& 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mboc{ for } 1 \leq \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}},\\
&=& \leyt(\frac{<H_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}\rihht)^2\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{ for } \fgac{<N_{dr}>}{N_{tr,min}} < 1 \leq \frac{(N_n-1)\Lambdw+T_{n}}{N_{tr,min}'}, \nonbmber \\
&=& \ldft(\ftac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{er,min}}\right)^2 \left(\nsac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}-(N_{tr,mij}-1)P}{P}\riyht)^\frdc{1}{2} \nonumbeg \\
&\ &\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox
course of $N_n$ nights may be broken four regimes. First, the average number time which the target is observed exceeds then it is statistically “certain” that transit will occur during the times of observation. Second, it may be that entire length of the survey is long enough that there are at least transits, that the time spent observing the average number of transits is less than that required for detection. Then is not certain to detect $N_{tr,min}$ transits, and is a decreasing window (for increasing planet period). Third, may $N_{tr,min}$ transits an run, only if the transit occurs sufficiently early during that particular run. The probability of detecting the system then decreases at even greater the orbital increases. the period of system so great that there is no which one could see the minimum number of required for detection, and $P_{window}=0$. Mathematically then, $$\begin{aligned} P_{window} &=& 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{ } \leq &=& \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ for } \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}} < 1 \leq \frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}}{N_{tr,min}P}, \nonumber \\ &=& \nonumber &\ &\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox
 course of $N_n$ nights may be brokEn up into foUr difFerEnt ReGimeS.

FirSt, if the average NUmbeR of transits during the toTal tiMe DUrinG WhIch thE target STaR IS obSeRvEd eXcEEdS $N_{tr,mIn}$, tHen it is StatisticaLly “CeRtain” that the TRaNsit will ocCur During the timEs oF obserVaTioN.

seconD, it May be That thE Entire Length of tHe SUrvey iS Long enoUGH tHat tHere are at least $N_{tr,MIn}$ TRansits, but that During ThE ToTAL tiMe sPent observInG the aVErage nuMBeR OF TraNSits is less thaN that requirED foR detecTiOn. THEn one iS not cErTAin To detect $N_{tr,Min}$ tRansits, anD there IS a decreASing winDow proBabIliTy (foR InCrEasInG PlaNEt PerIOd).

THird, one mAy HaVe $N_{tr,Min}$ tRANSIts dUriNg an ObserVing run, but onlY if The fIRst TransIt occUrs sUfFicieNtly eaRly duRiNg that particulaR run. the probabIliTy Of dEtEctinG The sysTem TheN decreaSes at an EVen GrEATEr Rate as the orbital peRiOD InCreases.

FInally, THe OrBItal periOd Of sYsteM MAy be sO greAT tHat there Is no poSSiBlE way in wHiCh one cOuLd sEe tHe minIMum nUmber oF transitS requIRed for a detectiON, and $P_{window}=0$. MaTHeMATiCAlly TheN, $$\begin{alignEd}
\laBEl{eq:510}
p_{winDOw} &=& 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \MboX{ For } 1 \leQ \frac{<n_{tR}>}{n_{tR,Min}},\\
&=& \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,miN}}\rIght)^2\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbOx{ for } \Frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}} < 1 \Leq \frac{(N_n-1)\LAMBDa+T_{n}}{N_{tr,mIn}P}, \nONuMBer \\
&=& \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{n_{tr,miN}}\right)^2 \left(\FRac{(N_n-1)\LamBda+T_{n}-(n_{tr,min}-1)P}{P}\Right)^\frac{1}{2} \NONumber \\
&\ &\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbOx
 course of $N_n$ nights ma y be broke n upint o f ou r di ffer ent regimes.
F irst , if the average numbe r oftr a nsit s  d uring  the to t al t ime  d ur ing  w h ic h the  ta rget st ar is obse rve dexceeds $N_{ t r, min}$, the n i t is statist ica lly “c er tai n ” tha t t he tr ansitw ill oc cur durin gt he tim e s of ob s e rv atio n.

Second, it ma y  b e  that the enti re len gt h  o f the  su rvey is lo ng  enou g h thatt he r e are at least $N_{ tr,min}$ tr a nsi ts, bu ttha t  durin g the  t o tal  time spent  obs erving th e aver a ge numb e r of tr ansits  is  le ss t h an  t hat  r e qui r ed  fo r  de tection.  T he n one  isn o t cert ain  todetec t $N_{tr,min} $ t rans i ts,  andthere  isadecre asingwindo wprobability (fo r in creasingpla ne t p er iod). 
Third , o nemay hav e $N_{t r ,mi n} $ t ra nsits during an ob se r v in g run, b ut onl y  i ft he first  t ran sito c curssuff i ci ently ea rly du r in gthat pa rt icular  r un.  Th e pro b abil ity of  detecti ng th e  system then d e creases at an ev e n  g r eate r r ate as theorbi t al p erio d  i ncr e ases. 

Fin al l y, the orbital periodof  syste m may  be so greatthat there i s  no poss ible wa y  in which onecould  see the m i nimum nu mberof trans its requi r e d for adet ect ion , a n d  $ P_{window}=0$ . Math em aticall y t hen, $$ \be gin {al ign ed }
\label{ eq:510}P_ {w in do w}&=& 1 \  \ \ \ \  \  \\\ \  \ \\  \ \ \  \ \\ \\\\  \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \m bo x{  for  }1\leq\fra c {<N _{tr}>} {N_{tr,mi n}} , \\
& =&  \ left(\f rac{<N_{tr}>} {N _{tr,min}} \r igh t)^2\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox {  for }\fr ac{<N _{tr }>}{N_{tr ,mi n}} <1 \ l eq \fr ac{(N_ n-1)\ La mbd a + T_{n} } { N_ {tr ,m in}P}, \no n u mbe r \\&= & \l eft(\fr ac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr , min }}\right)^2 \ lef t(\f r a c{ (N_ n -1 ) \La mb d a+T _ { n}-(N_{tr,min}- 1)P}{P}\ri gh t )^ \frac{1}{2 }  \n on umber \ \
&\ &\  \ \\  \ \ \\ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \  \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \  \ \ \mbo x 
 course_of $N_n$_nights may be broken_up into_four_different regimes.

First,_if_the average number_of transits during_the total time during_which the target_star_is observed exceeds $N_{tr,min}$, then it is statistically “certain” that the transit will occur_during_the times_of_observation.

Second,_it may be that the_entire length of the survey_is long_enough that there are at least $N_{tr,min}$ transits,_but_that during the_total time spent observing the average number of transits_is less than that required for_detection. Then one_is_not_certain to detect $N_{tr,min}$_transits, and there is a decreasing_window probability (for increasing planet period).

Third,_one may have $N_{tr,min}$ transits during an_observing run, but only if the_first transit occurs sufficiently early_during that_particular run. The probability of_detecting the system_then decreases_at an even_greater rate as the orbital period_increases.

Finally, the orbital_period of system may be so_great_that there is_no_possible_way in_which one could_see_the minimum_number_of transits required for a detection,_and_$P_{window}=0$. Mathematically then, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:510}
P_{window} &=& 1\ \_\ \ \ \_\_\ \ \ \_\ \ \ \ \_\ \ \ \ \ \_\ \_\ \_\ \ \ \ \ \mbox{ for } 1 \leq \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}},\\
&=&_\left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}\right)^2\ \ \ \ \ \_\ \ \ \_\ \_\_\ \ \mbox{_for_} \frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}_< 1 \leq \frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}}{N_{tr,min}P}, \nonumber \\
&=& \left(\frac{<N_{tr}>}{N_{tr,min}}\right)^2_\left(\frac{(N_n-1)\Lambda+T_{n}-(N_{tr,min}-1)P}{P}\right)^\frac{1}{2} \nonumber_\\
&\ &\ \ \ \ \_\ \ \ \_\_\ \ \ \ \ \_\ \ \ \ \ \_\ \ \ \ \_\_\_\ \ \ \ \mbox