 to determine the influence of both, disorder and interactions, we track the evolution of the magnetization for an ensemble of realizations for a given value of the disorder amplitude. We restate that the values of the intra and inter-species interaction considered in our study are such that the miscibility of hyperfine components can occur. In Figures \[Figure2\], \[Figure3\] and \[Figure4\] we summarize the results of our analysis. Each plot correspond to the average of the magnetization on the right (main plot) and left (inset) sides as a function of time for different values of disorder amplitude $\delta$. The specific values of $\delta$ are indicated in the figures. The values of the intra and inter-species interaction of figures \[Figure2\], \[Figure3\] and \[Figure4\] are $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.9 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$, $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.8 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ and $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.7 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ respectively. Different curves in each plot are the average over the realizations for a given values of $\delta$, being the shadow area around each curve associated with the root mean square deviation. From these figures, one can observe that for short times $\tau \lesssim 50$, the general relaxation behavior of the magnetization takes quite similar values, independent of the disorder strength. However, for later times $\tau \gtrsim 50$, each magnetization curve departs from each other, thus revealing the effects of the disordered media. Furthermore, as the disorder amplitude is increased, the ferromagnetic order in each domain is preserved against the relaxation process. This slow relaxation dynamics induced by disorder enhances memory-like effects in the coupled magnetic domains. In particular, for the largest value of the disorder amplitude considered, that is $\delta = 1$, the value of the magnetization in left and right sides remains unaltered around 60%. One can also notice two main outcomes associated with the value of the ratio $g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$. The first is that at zero disorder the relaxation time is decreased as the ratio $g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ is diminished. The second one is that as this ratio is increased, the magnetization becomes progressively worse with respect to its initial value.

The time dependence of the left and right magnetizations are well described by a power-law ansatz $m_R(\tau)\propto b(\delta)\tau^{\gamma (\delta)}$. We fit
to determine the influence of both, disorder and interactions, we track the development of the magnetization for an corps de ballet of realization for a given value of the disorder amplitude. We repeat that the values of the intra and inter - species interaction considered in our study are such that the miscibility of hyperfine component can occur. In Figures \[Figure2\ ], \[Figure3\ ] and \[Figure4\ ] we sum up the result of our analysis. Each plot represent to the average of the magnetization on the right (main plot) and leave (inset) sides as a function of time for different value of disorder amplitude $ \delta$. The specific values of $ \delta$ are indicated in the figure. The values of the intra and inter - species interaction of figures \[Figure2\ ], \[Figure3\ ] and \[Figure4\ ] are $ g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.9 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$, $ g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.8 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ and $ g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.7 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ respectively. Different curves in each plot are the average over the realization for a given values of $ \delta$, being the shadow area around each curve consociate with the root mean square deviation. From these figures, one can observe that for short times $ \tau \lesssim 50 $, the general relaxation behavior of the magnetization takes quite similar values, independent of the disorder strength. However, for later fourth dimension $ \tau \gtrsim 50 $, each magnetization curve departs from each other, therefore reveal the effect of the disordered media. Furthermore, as the disorder amplitude is increased, the ferromagnetic order in each domain is preserved against the liberalization process. This slow relaxation dynamics induced by disorder enhances memory - comparable effects in the coupled magnetic domains. In especial, for the largest value of the disorderliness amplitude regard, that is $ \delta = 1 $, the value of the magnetization in left and right sides remain unaltered around 60% . One can also notice two main result associated with the value of the ratio $ g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$. The first is that at zero disorder the rest time is decreased as the proportion $ g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ is diminished. The second one is that as this ratio is increased, the magnetization becomes increasingly worse with respect to its initial value. 

 The meter dependence of the left and correct magnetizations are well identify by a power - law ansatz $ m_R(\tau)\propto b(\delta)\tau^{\gamma (\delta)}$. We fit
 to determine the influence of both, disordgr and iiteractjons, we grack the evolution of the megnerizatuon for an ensemble of realizatpons for q giten value of the disordev ampmltude. Xe restate that the valuev of the intra avd inter-species interaction considereq in out dtudy are such thau tre mjscibility of hyperfine components can ocbur. In Figures \[Fibure2\], \[Figure3\] and \[Figure4\] we dummwrize the results lf our analiais. Wach plot cofrespond to the averagg of the magnetization on the rieht (mcin plot) ane oefh (inset) sidew as w function on time xor difgerent values pf visoeder amplitude $\delta$. Vhe specific values jf $\delta$ drz indicated in the fituees. Tve vdluer of tht iitrz and lntxr-species ihteraction if figures \[Figure2\], \[Fogtgr3\] and \[Figure4\] are $g_{\qornarrow\uparrow}=0.9 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$, $g_{\downargow\ularrow}=0.8 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ and $g_{\downarrow\uparroa}=0.7 g_{\uparror \uparrow}$ respectively. Different curves in each pnot ace tht qveraew lver the realizations for a given values of $\dqmts$, neing the shadow area arounc favr curve assockated cjtg the root mean sqkare dediatiin. From trese figures, one can observe thqt for short rimes $\tau \lesssim 50$, the generau rekaxatoon behavior of the maguetizafion takes euite simjuar values, indepdndvnt mf the disorder strength. Hjwever, foc latzr times $\tau \gtrsii 50$, each mahnetiddtion curve departd frol aach other, thus revealing the effects of vie disordered madid. Furthexmore, ss the disordqr amplitude ix increcsed, tfe ferromafnetic mrder in eash domain is [teserved agaiist the rqlaxqtiob procerr. This slow rekaxation bvnamics ibduced by disorder enfznces memory-likz tfdects in the cpupued mwgietic gomains. In pdrtizulxt, for the largesb vxlue of the disorder ampnituse considered, that if $\delta = 1$, the vajue of the mabnetization in lefu and cight rides reiains unaltered around 60%. One cah also nohicc two main ouecomcs afsociated cith the value of the ratio $g_{\downarrow \u'arrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$. Rhe first is that aj ztro disorder vhe rejaxation dime is decreased as the ratio $g_{\downavrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \ularrow}$ is dlminished. The second one is that as this ratio is increased, the magnetizarion bxcjmes progreasivrly wmrfz with wespxcv to its initial nalue.

The time dependence of the ueft and rnght magnetizations are well cercribed by a kower-law ansatz $m_R(\tau)\proptk b(\delta)\yau^{\gamma (\delta)}$. We fit
to determine the influence of both, disorder we the evolution the magnetization for a value of the amplitude. We restate the values of the intra and interaction considered in our study are such that the miscibility of hyperfine components occur. In Figures \[Figure2\], \[Figure3\] and \[Figure4\] we summarize the results of our Each correspond the of the magnetization on the right (main plot) and left (inset) sides as a function of for different values of disorder amplitude $\delta$. The values of $\delta$ are in the figures. The values the and inter-species of \[Figure2\], and \[Figure4\] are g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$, $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.8 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ and $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.7 g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ respectively. Different curves in each plot are the over the a given of being shadow area around associated with the root mean square figures, one can observe that for short times \lesssim 50$, general relaxation behavior of the magnetization quite similar values, independent of the disorder strength. for later times $\tau \gtrsim 50$, each magnetization curve departs from each other, thus revealing of the disordered media. as the disorder is the order each domain preserved against the relaxation process. This slow relaxation dynamics induced by enhances memory-like effects in the coupled magnetic domains. In particular, largest of the disorder considered, that is $\delta 1$, value of the magnetization and sides 60%. can notice two main outcomes with the value of the $g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$. The disorder the relaxation time is decreased as the $g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ is diminished. The second is that as this ratio is increased, the magnetization becomes progressively worse respect to value. The time dependence of the left and magnetizations are well described a power-law ansatz $m_R(\tau)\propto b(\delta)\tau^{\gamma (\delta)}$. We fit
 to determine the influence of Both, disordEr and IntEraCtIons, We trAck the evolutioN Of thE magnetization for an ensEmble Of REaliZAtIons fOr a giveN VaLUE of ThE dIsoRdER aMplitUde. we restaTe that the vAluEs Of the intra anD InTer-species IntEraction consIdeRed in oUr StuDY are sUch That tHe miscIBility Of hyperfiNe COmponeNTs can ocCUR. IN FigUres \[Figure2\], \[Figure3\] aND \[FIGure4\] we summarizE the reSuLTs OF Our AnaLysis. Each pLoT corrESpond to THe AVERagE Of the magnetizAtion on the rIGht (Main plOt) And LEft (insEt) sidEs AS a fUnction of tiMe foR differenT valueS Of disorDEr ampliTude $\deLta$. the SpecIFiC vAluEs OF $\deLTa$ Are INdiCated in tHe FiGures. the vALUES of tHe iNtra And inTer-species intEraCtioN Of fIgureS \[FiguRe2\], \[FiGuRe3\] and \[figure4\] Are $g_{\dOwNarrow\uparrow}=0.9 g_{\uParrOw \uparrow}$, $G_{\doWnArrOw\UparrOW}=0.8 g_{\uparRow \UpaRrow}$ and $G_{\downarROw\uPaRROW}=0.7 g_{\Uparrow \uparrow}$ respEcTIVeLy. DifferEnt curVEs In EAch plot aRe The AverAGE over The rEAlIzations For a giVEn VaLues of $\dElTa$, beinG tHe sHadOw areA ArouNd each Curve assOciatED with the root meAN square deviatIOn. fROm THese FigUres, one can oBserVE thaT for SHoRt tIMes $\taU \lessSiM 50$, ThE General relaxation beHaVior of The maGnetization taKes quite siMILAr values, IndePEnDEnt of the disordEr strEngth. HowevER, for lateR timeS $\tau \gtrsIm 50$, each magNETization CurVe dEpaRts FROm Each other, thus REVealInG the effEctS of the dIsoRdeRed MedIa. furthermoRe, as the dIsOrDeR aMplItude IS increasEd, The FeRroMagneTIc ordeR in eaCh doMaIn IS prEserved AGaINSt thE rElAxatIon PrOcess. this SLow RelaxatIon dynamiCs iNDuceD bY dIsorder Enhances memorY-lIke effects In The CoupleD MAgnetic dOmains. In particular, for thE Largest ValUe of tHe diSorder ampLitUde conSidERed, thaT is $\delTa = 1$, the VaLue OF The maGNEtIzaTiOn in left anD RIghT sideS rEmaiNs unaltEred around 60%. One can alSO noTice two main ouTcoMes aSSOcIatED wITh tHe VAluE OF the ratio $g_{\downaRrow \uparroW}/g_{\UPaRrow \uparroW}$. the FiRst is thAt at zerO disoRDer the rElaxation Time is decReAsed AS The Ratio $g_{\downArrow \upaRrow}/g_{\uparROw \upaRRoW}$ is diMinIshed. THe SecOnd onE is thaT As tHis raTio is iNcReased, The maGnEtizatioN becomes progressively woRse witH respEct To its initIal VAluE.

The time dEpenDence of the LefT anD righT maGNetizAtioNS aRe wELl desCribED by a power-LAw AnsATZ $m_r(\tau)\propto b(\DELTa)\tAu^{\gamMa (\dELta)}$. We fIt
 to determine the influenc e of both,  diso rde r a nd  int erac tions, we trac k  the  evolution of the magn etiza ti o n fo r  a n ens emble o f  r e a liz at io nsfo r  a  give n v alue of  the disor der  a mplitude. We re state that  th e values ofthe  intra  a ndi nter- spe ciesintera c tion c onsidered  i n  our s t udy are s uc h th at the miscibilit y  o f  hyperfine com ponent sc an o ccu r.In Figures  \ [Figu r e2\], \ [ Fi g u r e3\ ]  and \[Figure 4\] we summ a riz e there sul t s of o ur an al y sis . Each plot  cor respond t o thea verageo f the m agneti zat ion  ont he  r igh t( mai n  p lot )  an d left ( in se t) si desa s a  fun cti on o f tim e for differe ntvalu e s o f dis order  amp li tude$\delt a$. T he  specific value s of  $\delta$  ar eind ic atedi n thefig ure s. Thevalueso f t he i n tr a and inter-specie si n te ractionof fig u re s\ [Figure2 \] , \ [Fig u r e3\]and\ [F igure4\]  are $ g _{ \d ownarro w\ uparro w} =0. 9 g _{\up a rrow  \upar row}$, $ g_{\d o wnarrow\uparro w }=0.8 g_{\upa r ro w \u p arro w}$  and $g_{\d owna r row\ upar r ow }=0 . 7 g_{ \upar ro w  \ u parrow}$ respective ly . Diff erent  curves in ea ch plot ar e t he avera ge o v er the realizatio ns fo r a givenv alues of  $\de lta$, be ing the s h a dow area  ar oun d e ach c ur ve associated w ithth e rootmea n squar e d evi ati on.  F rom these  figures ,on eca n o bserv e  that fo rsho rt  ti mes $ \ tau \l esssi m 50 $,  t h e g eneralr el a x atio nbe havi orof  themagn e tiz ation t akes quit e s i mila rva lues, i ndependent of  t he disorde rstr ength. H owever,for later times $\tau \ g trsim 5 0$,  each  mag netizatio n c urve d epa r ts fro m each  othe r,  th u s  reve a l in g t he  effects o f the  diso rd ered  media.  Furthermore, as t h e d isorder ampli tud e is i nc rea s ed ,  th ef err o m agnetic order i n each dom ai n  i s preserve d  ag ai nst the  relaxa tionp rocess.  This slo w relaxat io n dy n a mic s inducedby disor der enhan c es me m or y-lik e e ffects  i n t he co upledm agn eticdomain s.  In pa rticu la r, for t he largest value of the  disor der a mpl itude con sid e red , that is  $\d elta = 1$,  th e v alueoft he ma gnet i za tio n  in l efta nd rights id esr e ma ins unalter e d aro und 6 0%. One ca n al so notice two mai n  outcomes asso ciat e d  wi tht he v al ue of the rati o $ g_ { \ downarro w\uparrow}/g _{\uparr ow \upar row}$.  The f irst is t ha t  at ze ro d iso rder therel ax a tion ti me  i s  decre ased  a s theratio$ g_{\ d o wnarrow \uparrow }/g_{ \ u parro w  \u parro w} $ is di m inis hed. The s econd one i s that  asthisratio i sincrea sed ,the magnet i zation be comes  progre ss ivel y w orse w ithr e spect  toit s i nitial va l u e. 
T he tim e de pende nc e of  the left and righ t m a gnetiza ti ons a re wel l  d e s cribed bya p ower- l a w ansatz $ m _R(\ t au ) \prop to b(\ delta) \tau^{\ g amm a(\delta )}$ . We fit
 to_determine the_influence of both, disorder_and interactions,_we_track the_evolution_of the magnetization_for an ensemble_of realizations for a_given value of_the_disorder amplitude. We restate that the values of the intra and inter-species interaction considered_in_our study_are_such_that the miscibility of hyperfine_components can occur. In Figures_\[Figure2\], \[Figure3\]_and \[Figure4\] we summarize the results of our_analysis._Each plot correspond_to the average of the magnetization on the right_(main plot) and left (inset) sides_as a function_of_time_for different values of_disorder amplitude $\delta$. The specific values_of $\delta$ are indicated in the_figures. The values of the intra and_inter-species interaction of figures \[Figure2\], \[Figure3\]_and \[Figure4\] are $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.9 g_{\uparrow_\uparrow}$, $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.8_g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$ and $g_{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.7 g_{\uparrow_\uparrow}$ respectively. Different_curves in_each plot are_the average over the realizations for_a given values_of $\delta$, being the shadow area_around_each curve associated_with_the_root mean_square deviation. From_these_figures, one_can_observe that for short times $\tau_\lesssim_50$, the general relaxation behavior of the_magnetization takes quite similar_values,_independent of the disorder_strength. However, for later times_$\tau \gtrsim 50$, each magnetization curve_departs from_each other,_thus revealing the effects of the disordered media. Furthermore, as the_disorder amplitude is increased, the ferromagnetic_order in each domain_is preserved_against_the relaxation process._This_slow relaxation_dynamics induced by disorder enhances memory-like effects_in the_coupled magnetic domains. In particular, for_the largest value of_the_disorder amplitude considered, that is $\delta_= 1$, the value of the_magnetization in left and right_sides_remains_unaltered around 60%. One can_also notice two main outcomes associated_with the value_of the ratio $g_{\downarrow \uparrow}/g_{\uparrow \uparrow}$. The_first_is that at zero disorder the_relaxation_time is decreased as the ratio_$g_{\downarrow_\uparrow}/g_{\uparrow_\uparrow}$ is diminished. The second_one is that as this ratio_is increased, the magnetization becomes progressively worse with respect_to its initial_value.

The time dependence of the_left_and_right magnetizations are well described by a power-law ansatz $m_R(\tau)\propto_b(\delta)\tau^{\gamma (\delta)}$._We fit