}\big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)\nonumber\\
&+\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)^{\dagger}\Big)(x'), \end{aligned}$$ where $\chi_{A(B)}^{\sigma}=\chi_{\sigma}(\varphi(A(B))$. Using the equality of the wave function at the junctions and noting that $\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi^{\sigma}(\varphi)=-\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi_{-}^{\sigma}(\varphi')$, the probability current density conservation condition simplifies to $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{up}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi=0\left(\varphi_{A}\right)}&+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{low}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi'=0\left(\varphi'_{A}\right)}  
+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{I(II)}^{\sigma}\big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ From that follows an additional pair of equations for the coefficients: $$\begin{aligned}
  &\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+t_{\sigma}=0,\\ 
&\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{-in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+i_{\sigma}-r_{\sigma}=0.  \end{aligned}$$ Together with Eqs. and, we now have enough equations to determine the coefficient set $\{r_{\sigma},
~t_{\sigma},~a_{\lambda}^{\sigma},~b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\}$, $\lambda=\pm$, for both spin polarizations $\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow$ as a function of the input coefficients $i_{\sigma}$, the incident wave number $k$, ring radius $\r$ and SOC-constant $\beta$. For an incident current from
} \big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)\nonumber\\ 
 & + \Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)^{\dagger}\Big)(x'), \end{aligned}$$ where $ \chi_{A(B)}^{\sigma}=\chi_{\sigma}(\varphi(A(B))$. Using the equality of the wave function at the junctions and noting that $ \hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi^{\sigma}(\varphi)=-\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi_{-}^{\sigma}(\varphi')$, the probability current concentration conservation circumstance simplifies to $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{up}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi=0\left(\varphi_{A}\right)}&+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{low}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi'=0\left(\varphi'_{A}\right) }  
 + \hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{I(II)}^{\sigma}\big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ From that stick to an additional couple of equations for the coefficient: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   & \sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+t_{\sigma}=0,\\ 
 & \sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{-in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+i_{\sigma}-r_{\sigma}=0.   \end{aligned}$$ Together with Eqs. and, we now hold enough equations to specify the coefficient set $ \{r_{\sigma }, 
 ~t_{\sigma},~a_{\lambda}^{\sigma},~b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\}$, $ \lambda=\pm$, for both spin polarization $ \sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow$ as a function of the input coefficients $ i_{\sigma}$, the incident wave phone number $ k$, gang radius $ \r$ and SOC - constant $ \beta$. For an incident current from
}\big)^{\fagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\cmi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)\nonumywr\\
&+\Psi_{IM}^{\sigma}\cgi_{B}^{\sigma}\cig(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\bij)^{\dagter}\Bit)(x'), \end{aligned}$$ where $\chk_{A(B)}^{\sigma}=\cji_{\sigma}(\vqrphm(A(B))$. Using the eqnzlity on the aave hunction at the junctions and noting thdt $\hct{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi^{\sigma}(\varphi)=-\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphy)\chi_{-}^{\sigka}(\garphi')$, the profabikyty dlrvent density conservation conditjon simklifies to $$\begin{alogned}
\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{up}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varpji=0\levt(\varphi_{A}\right)}&+\hat{v}_{0}\Osi_{low}^{\sigma}\vig|_{\vwephi'=0\left(\varpfi'_{A}\right)}  
+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{I(II)}^{\sifma}\big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ From that follows ab qddljional pair if eqlations for tmv coeffhcients: $$\begin{aligned}
  &\suk_{\lanbda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\nambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\laibda=+,-}b_{\lambga}^{\aigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sugna}}{k\r}+t_{\vigmd}=0,\\ 
&\suo_{\oamcda=+,-}z_{\lembsa}^{\sigmw}e^{ii_{\lambda}^{\sigmz}\varphi_{A}}\frax{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lsmfea=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigmz}e^{-in_{\laibqa}^{\sigma}\varphi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+i_{\sigma}-r_{\vigja}=0.  \end{aligned}$$ Together with Eqs. and, we now jave enoudh equations to determine the coefficient set $\{r_{\sicma},
~t_{\smgoa},~a_{\oaicea}^{\digma},~b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\}$, $\lambda=\pm$, for both spin polawjzstpons $\sigma=\uparrow,\bownarrow$ as a finftojn of the inpot coefyjcjents $i_{\sigma}$, the ijcident wave number $k$, rinb radius $\r$ and SOC-constant $\veta$. For an pncieent current from
}\big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)\nonumber\\ &+\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)^{\dagger}\Big)(x'), \end{aligned}$$ where $\chi_{A(B)}^{\sigma}=\chi_{\sigma}(\varphi(A(B))$. Using the the function at junctions and noting density condition simplifies to \hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{up}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi=0\left(\varphi_{A}\right)}&+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{low}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi'=0\left(\varphi'_{A}\right)} +\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{I(II)}^{\sigma}\big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ From follows an additional pair of equations the coefficients: $$\begin{aligned} &\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+t_{\sigma}=0,\\ &\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{-in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+i_{\sigma}-r_{\sigma}=0. \end{aligned}$$ Together with Eqs. and, we now have equations to determine the coefficient set $\{r_{\sigma}, ~t_{\sigma},~a_{\lambda}^{\sigma},~b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\}$, $\lambda=\pm$, for both spin polarizations as function the coefficients $i_{\sigma}$, the incident wave number $k$, ring radius $\r$ and SOC-constant $\beta$. For an incident from
}\big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigmA}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\Big)\noNumBer\\
&+\psI_{II}^{\sIgma}\Chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big(\haT{V}_{0}\Psi_{iI}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)^{\dagGer}\BiG)(x'), \ENd{alIGnEd}$$ wheRe $\chi_{A(B)}^{\SIgMA}=\Chi_{\SiGmA}(\vaRpHI(A(b))$. UsinG thE equaliTy of the wavE fuNcTion at the junCTiOns and notiNg tHat $\hat{v}_{SO}(\varPhi)\Chi^{\sigMa}(\VarPHi)=-\hat{V}_{SO}(\VarphI)\chi_{-}^{\siGMa}(\varpHi')$, the probAbILity cuRRent denSITy ConsErvation condition SImPLifies to $$\begin{aLigned}
\HaT{V}_{0}\PSI_{Up}^{\sIgmA}\big|_{\varphi=0\LeFt(\varPHi_{A}\righT)}&+\HaT{V}_{0}\pSi_{lOW}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varpHi'=0\left(\varphI'_{a}\riGht)}  
+\hat{V}_{0}\PSi_{I(ii)}^{\sigma}\Big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\NoNUmbEr\\\end{aligneD}$$ FroM that follOws an aDDitionaL Pair of eQuatioNs fOr tHe coEFfIcIenTs: $$\BEgiN{AlIgnED}
  &\suM_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\LaMbDa}^{\sigMa}\frAC{N_{\LAmbdA}^{\siGma}}{k\R}-\sum_{\lAmbda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sIgmA}\fraC{N_{\laMbda}^{\sIgma}}{k\R}+t_{\siGmA}=0,\\ 
&\sum_{\lAmbda=+,-}a_{\LambdA}^{\sIgma}e^{in_{\lambda}^{\siGma}\vArphi_{A}}\fraC{n_{\lAmBda}^{\SiGma}}{k\r}-\SUm_{\lambDa=+,-}b_{\LamBda}^{\sigmA}e^{-in_{\lamBDa}^{\sIgMA}\VArPhi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigMa}}{K\R}+I_{\sIgma}-r_{\sigMa}=0.  \end{aLIgNeD}$$ together WiTh EQs. anD, WE now hAve eNOuGh equatiOns to dETeRmIne the cOeFficieNt Set $\{R_{\siGma},
~t_{\sIGma},~a_{\Lambda}^{\Sigma},~b_{\laMbda}^{\sIGma}\}$, $\lambda=\pm$, for BOth spin polariZAtIONs $\SIgma=\UpaRrow,\downarrOw$ as A FuncTion OF tHe iNPut coEfficIeNTs $I_{\Sigma}$, the incident wavE nUmber $k$, Ring rAdius $\r$ and SOC-cOnstant $\betA$. fOR an incidEnt cURrENt from
}\big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{ v}_{0}\Psi _{II} ^{\ sig ma }\ch i_{B }^{\sigma}\big ) \non umber\\
&+\Psi_{II}^{\ sigma }\ c hi_{ B }^ {\sig ma}\big ( \h a t {v} _{ 0} \Ps i_ { II }^{\s igm a}\chi_ {B}^{\sigm a}\ bi g)^{\dagger} \ Bi g)(x'), \e nd{ aligned}$$ w her e $\ch i_ {A( B )}^{\ sig ma}=\ chi_{\ s igma}( \varphi(A (B ) )$. Us i ng thee q ua lity  of the wave func t io n  at the juncti ons an dn ot i n g t hat  $\hat{v}_ {S O}(\v a rphi)\c h i^ { \ s igm a }(\varphi)=-\ hat{v}_{SO} ( \va rphi)\ ch i_{ - }^{\si gma}( \v a rph i')$, the p roba bility cu rrentd ensityc onserva tion c ond iti on s i mp li fie st o $ $ \b egi n {al igned}
\ ha t{ v}_{0 }\Ps i _ { u p}^{ \si gma} \big| _{\varphi=0\l eft (\va r phi _{A}\ right )}&+ \h at{v} _{0}\P si_{l ow }^{\sigma}\big| _{\v arphi'=0\ lef t( \va rp hi'_{ A }\righ t)}   +\hat{v }_{0}\P s i_{ I( I I ) }^ {\sigma}\big|_{x(x ') = 0 }= 0.\nonum ber\\\ e nd {a l igned}$$  F rom  tha t follo ws a n  a dditiona l pair of  e quation sfor th ecoe ffi cient s : $$ \begin {aligned }
  & \ sum_{\lambda=+ , -}a_{\lambda} ^ {\ s i gm a }\fr ac{ n_{\lambda} ^{\s i gma} }{k\ r }- \su m _{\la mbda= +, - }b _ {\lambda}^{\sigma}\ fr ac{n_{ \lamb da}^{\sigma}} {k\r}+t_{\ s i g ma}=0,\\  
&\ s um _ {\lambda=+,-}a _{\la mbda}^{\si g ma}e^{in _{\la mbda}^{\ sigma}\va r p hi_{A}}\ fra c{n _{\ lam b d a} ^{\sigma}}{k\ r } -\su m_ {\lambd a=+ ,-}b_{\ lam bda }^{ \si gm a}e^{-in_ {\lambda }^ {\ si gm a}\ varph i '_{A}}\f ra c{n _{ \la mbda} ^ {\sigm a}}{k \r}+ i_ {\ s igm a}-r_{\ s ig m a }=0.  \e nd{a lig ne d}$$Toge t her  with E qs. and,wen ow h av eenoughequations tode termine th ecoe fficie n t  set $\{ r_{\sigma},
~t_{\sigma} , ~a_{\la mbd a}^{\ sigm a},~b_{\l amb da}^{\ sig m a}\}$,  $\lam bda=\ pm $,f o r bot h sp inpo larization s $\s igma= \u parr ow,\dow narrow$ as a funct i onof the inputcoe ffic i e nt s $ i _{ \ sig ma } $,t h e incident wave  number $k $, ri ng radius$ \r$  a nd SOC- constan t $\b e ta$. Fo r an inci dent curr en t fr o m 
}\big)^{\dagger}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)\nonumber\\
&+\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big(\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{II}^{\sigma}\chi_{B}^{\sigma}\big)^{\dagger}\Big)(x'), \end{aligned}$$_where $\chi_{A(B)}^{\sigma}=\chi_{\sigma}(\varphi(A(B))$._Using the equality of_the wave_function_at the_junctions_and noting that_$\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi^{\sigma}(\varphi)=-\hat{v}_{SO}(\varphi)\chi_{-}^{\sigma}(\varphi')$, the probability_current density conservation condition_simplifies to $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{up}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi=0\left(\varphi_{A}\right)}&+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{low}^{\sigma}\big|_{\varphi'=0\left(\varphi'_{A}\right)}__
+\hat{v}_{0}\Psi_{I(II)}^{\sigma}\big|_{x(x')=0}=0.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ From that follows an additional pair of equations for the coefficients: $$\begin{aligned}
 _&\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+t_{\sigma}=0,\\_
&\sum_{\lambda=+,-}a_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}-\sum_{\lambda=+,-}b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}e^{-in_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\varphi'_{A}}\frac{n_{\lambda}^{\sigma}}{k\r}+i_{\sigma}-r_{\sigma}=0. _\end{aligned}$$_Together_with Eqs. and, we now_have enough equations to determine_the coefficient_set $\{r_{\sigma},
~t_{\sigma},~a_{\lambda}^{\sigma},~b_{\lambda}^{\sigma}\}$, $\lambda=\pm$, for both spin polarizations $\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow$_as_a function of_the input coefficients $i_{\sigma}$, the incident wave number $k$,_ring radius $\r$ and SOC-constant $\beta$._For an incident_current_from