eq}$ is explained considering that the energy $e(t)$ after such a quench decays like the annihilation process $A + A \rightarrow A$ in one dimension with a diffusion rate $\Gamma$: $e(t) \sim 
(\Gamma t)^{-1/2}$. The energy thus reaches that equilibrium ($e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$) after an equilibrium time $t_{eq} \sim \Gamma^{-1} \, e_{eq}^{-2} \sim e^{3/T_f}$ due to the temperature-dependent diffusion rate ($\Gamma 
\sim e^{-1/T_f}$). With a similar argument it is possible to estimate the waiting time $t_w(T_i,T_f) \sim \Gamma^{-1}
(T_i) \, e_{eq}^{-2}(T_f) \sim e^{1/T_i} \, e^{2/T_f}$ where the equilibrium energy to reach is $e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$ but the diffusion rate is $\Gamma(T_i) \sim e^{-1/T_i}$ since the temperature of the system before $t_w$ is set to $T_i$. We recover the equilibrium time when $T_i = T_f$. The estimate of the waiting time agrees qualitatively with the values obtained from numerical simulations for the different couples of intermediate and final temperatures considered.

Let us now analyse the short timescales behaviour. The fast increase of the energy is related to the probability $p_i$ to have neighbouring defects. Such a probability is given at $t_w$ by $p_i = 
e(t_w) \, e_{eq}(T_i)$ where $e(t_w) = e_{eq}(T_f)$ is the probability to have a defect at $t_w$ and $e_{eq}(T_i)$ is the probability for its neighbour to also be a defect. This last term corresponds to the equilibrium probability $P_{eq}(d=1,T_i)$ due to the fact that the timescale to equilibrate the concentration of neighbouring defects (or non-constrained defects) is $t \sim O(1) \ll t_w$ and has thus already equilibrated at $t_w$. When the temperature is
eq}$ is explained considering that the energy $ e(t)$ after such a quench decays like the annihilation procedure $ deoxyadenosine monophosphate + A \rightarrow A$ in one dimension with a diffusion rate $ \Gamma$: $ e(t) \sim 
 (\Gamma t)^{-1/2}$. The department of energy thus reaches that equilibrium ($ e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1 / T_f}$) after an chemical equilibrium time $ t_{eq } \sim \Gamma^{-1 } \, e_{eq}^{-2 } \sim e^{3 / T_f}$ due to the temperature - dependent dissemination rate ($ \Gamma 
 \sim e^{-1 / T_f}$). With a similar argumentation it is possible to estimate the wait time $ t_w(T_i, T_f) \sim \Gamma^{-1 } 
 (T_i) \, e_{eq}^{-2}(T_f) \sim e^{1 / T_i } \, e^{2 / T_f}$ where the equilibrium energy to reach is $ e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1 / T_f}$ but the diffusion rate is $ \Gamma(T_i) \sim e^{-1 / T_i}$ since the temperature of the system before $ t_w$ is sic to $ T_i$. We recover the equilibrium time when $ T_i = T_f$. The appraisal of the waiting time agree qualitatively with the values obtain from numerical simulations for the different couples of intermediate and concluding temperatures considered. 

 Let us now analyse the short timescales behavior. The fast increase of the energy is related to the probability $ p_i$ to have neighbouring defects. Such a probability is given at $ t_w$ by $ p_i = 
 e(t_w) \, e_{eq}(T_i)$ where $ e(t_w) = e_{eq}(T_f)$ is the probability to have a defect at $ t_w$ and $ e_{eq}(T_i)$ is the probability for its neighbour to besides be a blemish. This last term corresponds to the chemical equilibrium probability $ P_{eq}(d=1,T_i)$ due to the fact that the timescale to equilibrate the concentration of neighbouring defects (or non - constrained defect) is $ t \sim O(1) \ll t_w$ and has thus already equilibrated at $ t_w$. When the temperature is
eq}$ ls explained considering that the energi $w(t)$ aftxr such a quencf decays like the annihilatiln proctfs $A + A \rightarrow A$ in one dimensiin wmth a diffusion czte $\Gamma$: $e(t) \alm 
(\Gakna t)^{-1/2}$. The energi thus reachas that equilitrkul ($e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$) after an equilibriui time $y_{ee} \sim \Gamma^{-1} \, e_{gq}^{-2} \sik e^{3/T_f}$ due to the temperature-dependent djffusioi rate ($\Gamma 
\sik e^{-1/T_f}$). With a similar argumfnt lt is possible to fstimate thg wayring time $t_w(G_i,T_f) \sim \Gamma^{-1}
(T_i) \, e_{eq}^{-2}(T_r) \sim e^{1/T_i} \, e^{2/T_f}$ where the equilicrium energy to rwacj is $e_{eq}(T_f) \smm e^{-1/T_f}$ but the difnlsion rdte is $\Bamma(T_i) \sim e^{-1/T_l}$ sinre tye temperature of the system before $t_w$ ys set to $T_n$. We recover the equioivrium tima whdb $T_k = U_f$. Vhe estimwte of the wajting time qgrees qualitativelu rpyh the valuea obtaynqd from numerical simulations for the dpffedent couples of intermeeiate and final tempetatures cogsidered.

Let us now analyse the short timescales bahavikjr. Uhc wqsh increase of the energy is related to the prjganikity $p_i$ to havc neighbouring defrchs. Fuch a probabklity na fiven at $t_w$ by $p_i = 
e(t_w) \, e_{gq}(T_i)$ wyere $e(t_w) = e_{eq}(Y_f)$ is the probability to hace a defect ct $r_w$ and $e_{eq}(T_i)$ is thz probabilitv for ots nrighbour to also be a dzfect. Fhis last tfrm correaoonds to the equklinrigm probability $P_{eq}(d=1,T_i)$ due eo the fart thct the tkmesvale tj equilibrwte tma concentration of neigkbourhng defectd (or non-constrained defects) is $v \sim O(1) \ll t_w$ atd vas thus alresdy equilibraeed at $t_w$. When the teiperagure is
eq}$ is explained considering that the energy such quench decays the annihilation process in dimension with a rate $\Gamma$: $e(t) (\Gamma t)^{-1/2}$. The energy thus reaches equilibrium ($e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$) after an equilibrium time $t_{eq} \sim \Gamma^{-1} \, e_{eq}^{-2} e^{3/T_f}$ due to the temperature-dependent diffusion rate ($\Gamma \sim e^{-1/T_f}$). With a similar it possible estimate waiting time $t_w(T_i,T_f) \sim \Gamma^{-1} (T_i) \, e_{eq}^{-2}(T_f) \sim e^{1/T_i} \, e^{2/T_f}$ where the equilibrium energy reach is $e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$ but the diffusion is $\Gamma(T_i) \sim e^{-1/T_i}$ the temperature of the system $t_w$ set to We the time when $T_i T_f$. The estimate of the waiting time agrees qualitatively with the values obtained from numerical simulations for different couples and final considered. us analyse the short The fast increase of the energy the probability $p_i$ to have neighbouring defects. Such probability is at $t_w$ by $p_i = e(t_w) e_{eq}(T_i)$ where $e(t_w) = e_{eq}(T_f)$ is the probability have a defect at $t_w$ and $e_{eq}(T_i)$ is the probability for its neighbour to also defect. This last term to the equilibrium $P_{eq}(d=1,T_i)$ to fact the timescale equilibrate the concentration of neighbouring defects (or non-constrained defects) is $t O(1) \ll t_w$ and has thus already equilibrated at $t_w$. temperature
eq}$ is explained considering tHat the enerGy $e(t)$ aFteR suCh A queNch dEcays like the anNIhilAtion process $A + A \rightarrOw A$ in OnE DimeNSiOn witH a diffuSIoN RAte $\gaMmA$: $e(t) \SiM 
(\gaMma t)^{-1/2}$. THe eNergy thUs reaches tHat EqUilibrium ($e_{eq}(t_F) \sIm e^{-1/T_f}$) after An eQuilibrium tiMe $t_{Eq} \sim \GAmMa^{-1} \, e_{EQ}^{-2} \sim e^{3/t_f}$ dUe to tHe tempERature-Dependent DiFFusion RAte ($\GammA 
\SIm E^{-1/T_f}$). WIth a similar argumeNT iT Is possible to esTimate ThE WaITIng TimE $t_w(T_i,T_f) \sim \gaMma^{-1}
(T_i) \, E_{Eq}^{-2}(T_f) \sim E^{1/t_i} \, E^{2/t_F}$ WheRE the equilibriUm energy to rEAch Is $e_{eq}(T_F) \sIm e^{-1/t_F}$ but thE diffUsIOn rAte is $\Gamma(T_I) \sim E^{-1/T_i}$ since tHe tempERature oF The systEm befoRe $t_W$ is Set tO $t_i$. we RecOvER thE EqUilIBriUm time whEn $t_i = t_f$. The EstiMATE Of thE waItinG time Agrees qualitaTivEly wITh tHe valUes obTainEd From nUmericAl simUlAtions for the difFereNt couples Of iNtErmEdIate aND final TemPerAtures cOnsiderED.

LeT uS NOW aNalyse the short timeScALEs BehaviouR. The faST iNcREase of thE eNerGy is RELated To thE PrObabilitY $p_i$ to hAVe NeIghbourInG defecTs. sucH a pRobabILity Is giveN at $t_w$ by $p_I = 
e(t_w) \, e_{EQ}(T_i)$ where $e(t_w) = e_{eq}(t_F)$ is the probabiLItY TO hAVe a dEfeCt at $t_w$ and $e_{eQ}(T_i)$ iS The pRobaBIlIty FOr its NeighBoUR tO Also be a defect. This laSt Term coRrespOnds to the equiLibrium proBABIlity $P_{eq}(D=1,T_i)$ dUE tO The fact that the TimesCale to equiLIbrate thE concEntratioN of neighbOURing defeCts (Or nOn-cOnsTRAiNed defects) is $t \SIM O(1) \ll T_w$ And has tHus Already EquIliBraTed At $T_w$. When the TemperatUrE iS
eq}$ is explained consider ing that t he en erg y $ e( t)$afte r such a quenc h  dec ays like the annihilat ion p ro c ess$ A+ A \ rightar r ow A $ i non e d im e ns ion w ith  a diff usion rate  $\ Ga mma$: $e(t)\ si m 
(\Gamma  t) ^{-1/2}$. Th e e nergyth usr eache s t hat e quilib r ium ($ e_{eq}(T_ f) \sim e ^ {-1/T_f } $ )afte r an equilibriumt im e  $t_{eq} \sim\Gamma ^{ - 1} \ , e _{e q}^{-2} \s im  e^{3 / T_f}$ d u et o the temperature-d ependent di f fus ion ra te  ($ \ Gamma
\sim  e ^ {-1 /T_f}$). Wi th a  similarargume n t it is possibl e to e sti mat e th e  w ai tin gt ime $t _w( T _i, T_f) \si m\G amma^ {-1} ( T _ i) \ , e _{eq }^{-2 }(T_f) \sim e ^{1 /T_i }  \,  e^{2 /T_f} $ wh er e the  equil ibriu menergy to reach  is$e_{eq}(T _f)  \ sim  e ^{-1/ T _f}$ b utthe  diffus ion rat e  is  $ \ G a mm a(T_i) \sim e^{-1/ T_ i } $since th e temp e ra tu r e of the  s yst em b e f ore $ t_w$ is  set to$T_i$. We  r ecoverth e equi li bri umtimew hen$T_i =  T_f$. T he es t imate of the w a iting time ag r ee s qu a lita tiv ely with th e va l uesobta i ne d f r om nu meric al si m ulations for the di ff erentcoupl es of interme diate andf i n al tempe ratu r es considered.

L et us  now analy s e the sh ort t imescale s behavio u r . The fa stinc rea seo f  t he energy isr e late dto thepro babilit y $ p_i $ t o h av e neighbo uring de fe ct s.  S uch  a pr o bability  i s g iv enat $t _ w$ by$p_i= 
e (t _w )  \,  e_{eq} ( T_ i ) $ wh er e$e(t _w)  =  e_{e q}(T _ f)$  is the  probabil ity to h av ea defec t at $t_w$ an d$e_{eq}(T_ i) $ i s thep r obabilit y for its neighbour toa lso bea d efect . Th is last t erm  corre spo n ds tothe eq uilib ri ump r obabi l i ty  $P _{ eq}(d=1,T_ i ) $ d ue to  t he f act tha t the timescale to equ ilibrate thecon cent r a ti ono fn eig hb o uri n g  defects (or no n-constrai ne d  d efects) is $t\s im O(1)  \ll t_ w$ an d  has th us alread y equilib ra teda t  $t _w$. Whenthe temp erature i s 
eq}$ is_explained considering_that the energy $e(t)$_after such_a_quench decays_like_the annihilation process_$A + A_\rightarrow A$ in one_dimension with a_diffusion_rate $\Gamma$: $e(t) \sim 
(\Gamma t)^{-1/2}$. The energy thus reaches that equilibrium ($e_{eq}(T_f) \sim_e^{-1/T_f}$)_after an_equilibrium_time_$t_{eq} \sim \Gamma^{-1} \, e_{eq}^{-2}_\sim e^{3/T_f}$ due to the_temperature-dependent diffusion_rate ($\Gamma 
\sim e^{-1/T_f}$). With a similar argument_it_is possible to_estimate the waiting time $t_w(T_i,T_f) \sim \Gamma^{-1}
(T_i) \, e_{eq}^{-2}(T_f)_\sim e^{1/T_i} \, e^{2/T_f}$ where the_equilibrium energy to_reach_is_$e_{eq}(T_f) \sim e^{-1/T_f}$ but_the diffusion rate is $\Gamma(T_i) \sim_e^{-1/T_i}$ since the temperature of the_system before $t_w$ is set to $T_i$._We recover the equilibrium time when_$T_i = T_f$. The estimate_of the_waiting time agrees qualitatively with_the values obtained_from numerical_simulations for the_different couples of intermediate and final_temperatures considered.

Let us_now analyse the short timescales behaviour._The_fast increase of_the_energy_is related_to the probability_$p_i$_to have_neighbouring_defects. Such a probability is given_at_$t_w$ by $p_i = 
e(t_w) \, e_{eq}(T_i)$_where $e(t_w) = e_{eq}(T_f)$_is_the probability to have_a defect at $t_w$ and_$e_{eq}(T_i)$ is the probability for its_neighbour to_also be_a defect. This last term corresponds to the equilibrium probability $P_{eq}(d=1,T_i)$_due to the fact that the_timescale to equilibrate the_concentration of_neighbouring_defects (or non-constrained_defects)_is $t_\sim O(1) \ll t_w$ and has thus_already equilibrated_at $t_w$. When the temperature is