 $l = 1$. For $l = 2$, the AIM values are compared to the sixth order WKB values. As already noted, since there are additional correction terms, the sixth order WKB QNM frequencies are closer to the numerical values than the third order WKB values. Again the AIM does not appear to be as precise in calculating the QNM frequencies for spin half perturbations of the Kerr black hole as it was for the scalar perturbations (at least for $15$ iterations). As we mentioned, additional tables and plots of these Kerr processes shall constitute a future work [@Blake].

   l   n      Numerical         Third Order WKB        Sixth Order WKB               AIM
  --- --- ------------------ --------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
   0   0   0.1830 - 0.0970i    0.1765 - 0.1001i       0.1827 - 0.0949i        0.1830 - 0.0969i
                               (-3.55%, 3.20%)       (-0.16%, -2.16%)      ($<$0.01%, -0.10%)
   1   0   0.3800 - 0.0964i    0.3786 - 0.0965i       0.3801 - 0.0964i        0.3800 - 0.0964i
                               (-0.37%, 0.10%)      (0.03%, $<$0.01%)     ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.3558 - 0.2975i    0.3536 - 0.2987i       0.3559 - 0.2973i        0.3568 - 0.2976i
                               (-0.62%, 0.40%)       (0.03%, -0.07%)         (0.28%, 0.03%)
   2   0   0.5741 - 0.0963i    0.5737 - 0.0963i       0.5741 - 0.0963i        0.5741 - 0.0963i
                              (-0.07%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.5570 - 0.29
$ l = 1$. For $ l = 2 $, the AIM values are compared to the sixth decree WKB value. As already noted, since there are additional discipline terms, the sixth order WKB QNM frequencies are close to the numerical values than the third ordering WKB values. Again the AIM does not appear to be equally precise in calculating the QNM frequencies for spin one-half perturbations of the Kerr black fix as it was for the scalar perturbations (at least for $ 15 $ iterations). As we mention, additional tables and plots of these Kerr process shall constitute a future work [ @Blake ]. 

    l    n       Numerical          Third Order WKB         Sixth Order WKB                AIM 
   --- --- ------------------ --------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- 
    0    0    0.1830 - 0.0970i     0.1765 - 0.1001i        0.1827 - 0.0949i         0.1830 - 0.0969i 
                                (-3.55% , 3.20 %)        (-0.16% , -2.16 %)       ($ < $ 0.01% , -0.10 %) 
    1    0    0.3800 - 0.0964i     0.3786 - 0.0965i        0.3801 - 0.0964i         0.3800 - 0.0964i 
                                (-0.37% , 0.10 %)       (0.03% , $ < $ 0.01 %)      ($ < $ 0.01% , $ < $ 0.01 %) 
        1    0.3558 - 0.2975i     0.3536 - 0.2987i        0.3559 - 0.2973i         0.3568 - 0.2976i 
                                (-0.62% , 0.40 %)        (0.03% , -0.07 %)          (0.28% , 0.03 %) 
    2    0    0.5741 - 0.0963i     0.5737 - 0.0963i        0.5741 - 0.0963i         0.5741 - 0.0963i 
                               (-0.07% , $ < $ 0.01 %)    ($ < $ 0.01% , $ < $ 0.01 %)    ($ < $ 0.01% , $ < $ 0.01 %) 
        1    0.5570 - 0.29
 $l = 1$. For $l = 2$, the AIM values are compared to the smxth orser WKB xalues. As already noted, sincx thwre aee additional correctiun terms, nhe sixth ordtr WKB QNM frequeidies arc cloacr to vhe numerical vslues than the third ordar WNB values. Again the AIM does not ap[ear to bf as precise ig caksulafpnn the QNM frequencies for spin hzlf peruurbations of the Lerr black hole as it was vor hhe scalar perturbwtions (at lgzst dor $15$ iteratiuns). As we mentioned, adsitional tables and plots of thdse Kzrr processgs sjdll constitnte a suture work [@Nkake].

   l   n      Numerical         Third Order WKB        Sixth Order WHB               AIM
  --- --- ------------------ --------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
   0   0   0.1830 - 0.0970i    0.1765 - 0.1001i       0.1827 - 0.0949i        0.1830 - 0.0969i
                               (-3.55%, 3.20%)       (-0.16%, -2.16%)      ($<$0.01%, -0.10%)
   1   0   0.3800 - 0.0964y    0.3786 - 0.0965i       0.3801 - 0.0964i        0.3800 - 0.0964i
                               (-0.37%, 0.10%)      (0.03%, $<$0.01%)     ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.3558 - 0.2975i    0.3536 - 0.2987i       0.3559 - 0.2973i        0.3568 - 0.2976i
                               (-0.62%, 0.40%)       (0.03%, -0.07%)         (0.28%, 0.03%)
   2   0   0.5741 - 0.0963i    0.5737 - 0.0963i       0.5741 - 0.0963i        0.5741 - 0.0963i
                              (-0.07%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.5570 - 0.29
$l = 1$. For $l = 2$, values compared to sixth order WKB there additional correction terms, sixth order WKB frequencies are closer to the numerical than the third order WKB values. Again the AIM does not appear to as precise in calculating the QNM frequencies for spin half perturbations of the black as was the scalar perturbations (at least for $15$ iterations). As we mentioned, additional tables and plots of Kerr processes shall constitute a future work [@Blake]. n Numerical Third Order Sixth Order WKB AIM --- ------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------- 0 - 0.1765 - 0.1001i - 0.0949i 0.1830 - 0.0969i (-3.55%, 3.20%) (-0.16%, -2.16%) ($<$0.01%, -0.10%) 1 0 0.3800 - 0.0964i 0.3786 0.0965i 0.3801 0.3800 - (-0.37%, (0.03%, ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%) 1 0.2975i 0.3536 - 0.2987i 0.3559 - 0.2976i (-0.62%, 0.40%) (0.03%, -0.07%) (0.28%, 0.03%) 2 0.5741 - 0.5737 - 0.0963i 0.5741 - 0.0963i - 0.0963i (-0.07%, $<$0.01%) ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%) ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%) 0.5570 - 0.29
 $l = 1$. For $l = 2$, the AIM values are compaRed to the siXth orDer wKB VaLues. as alReady noted, sincE TherE are additional correctiOn terMs, THe siXTh Order wKB QNM fREqUENciEs ArE clOsER tO the nUmeRical vaLues than thE thIrD order WKB valUEs. again the AIm doEs not appear tO be As precIsE in CAlculAtiNg the qNM freQUencieS for spin hAlF PerturBAtions oF THe kerr Black hole as it was fOR tHE scalar perturbAtions (At LEaST For $15$ IteRations). As wE mEntioNEd, additIOnAL TAblES and plots of thEse Kerr procESseS shall CoNstITute a fUture WoRK [@BlAke].

   l   n      NumeriCal         THird Order wKB        SixTH Order Wkb               AIM
  --- --- ------------------ --------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
   0   0   0.1830 - 0.0970i    0.1765 - 0.1001i       0.1827 - 0.0949i        0.1830 - 0.0969I
                               (-3.55%, 3.20%)       (-0.16%, -2.16%)      ($<$0.01%, -0.10%)
   1   0   0.3800 - 0.0964i    0.3786 - 0.0965i       0.3801 - 0.0964i        0.3800 - 0.0964i
                               (-0.37%, 0.10%)      (0.03%, $<$0.01%)     ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.3558 - 0.2975i    0.3536 - 0.2987I       0.3559 - 0.2973i        0.3568 - 0.2976i
                               (-0.62%, 0.40%)       (0.03%, -0.07%)         (0.28%, 0.03%)
   2   0   0.5741 - 0.0963I    0.5737 - 0.0963i       0.5741 - 0.0963i        0.5741 - 0.0963I
                              (-0.07%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
       1   0.5570 - 0.29
 $l = 1$. For $l = 2$, the  AIM value s are  co mpa re d to  the  sixth order W K B va lues. As already noted , sin ce ther e  a re ad ditiona l  c o r rec ti on  te rm s ,the s ixt h order  WKB QNM f req ue ncies are cl o se r to the n ume rical values  th an the  t hir d  orde r W KB va lues.A gain t he AIM do es not ap p ear tob e  a s pr ecise in calculat i ng the QNM freque nciesfo r  s p i n h alf  perturbat io ns of the Ker r  b l a c k h o le as it wasfor the sca l arpertur ba tio n s (atleast  f o r $ 15$ iterati ons) . As we m ention e d, addi t ional t ablesand  pl otso fth ese  K e rrp ro ces s esshall co ns ti tutea fu t u r e  wor k [ @Bla ke].
   l   n     N umer i cal         T hird  O rderWKB      Si xth Order WKB            AIM 
 -- ---- - - ------ --- --- ---- -- ------- - --- -- - - - -- - ---------------- -- - - -- - ------ ------ - -- -- - -----
  0   0  0 . 1830- 0. 0 97 0i    0. 1765 - 0. 10 01i     0.182 7- 0 .09 49i     0.183 0 - 0.09 69i
                         (- 3 . 55 % , 3. 20% )       (-0 .16% ,  -2. 16%)    ( $<$0. 01%,-0 . 10 % )
   1   0   0.3800  -  0.096 4i   0.3786 - 0.0 965i     0 . 3801 - 0 .096 4 i      0.3800 -  0.09 64i
                          (-0.37 % ,  0.10%)    ( 0.0 3%, $ <$ 0.01%)     ($ < $ 0.01 %,  $<$0.0 1%) 
      1  0 .35 58-0.2975i   0.3536  -  0 .2 98 7i    0.3559 -  0 .29 73 i     0.3568  - 0. 2976 i                   (- 0. 62%,0.40 % )      (0 .03%, -0. 07% )       (0.28% , 0.03%)
   2   0   0.574 1- 0 .0963i   0.5737  - 0.0963i       0.5741 - 0.096 3i      0. 5741 - 0. 096 3i
                     ( -0.07 % ,  $ <$0 .0 1%)   ($<$ 0 . 01% , $<$ 0. 01%)    ($<$ 0.01%, $<$0.01%)
    1   0.5570- 0 .29
 $l_= 1$._For $l = 2$,_the AIM_values_are compared_to_the sixth order_WKB values. As_already noted, since there_are additional correction_terms,_the sixth order WKB QNM frequencies are closer to the numerical values than the_third_order WKB_values._Again_the AIM does not appear_to be as precise in_calculating the_QNM frequencies for spin half perturbations of the_Kerr_black hole as_it was for the scalar perturbations (at least for_$15$ iterations). As we mentioned, additional_tables and plots_of_these_Kerr processes shall constitute_a future work [@Blake].

  _l   n  _   Numerical   _     Third_Order WKB   _ _  Sixth Order WKB_  _ _  _     _AIM
  ---_--- ------------------ --------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
 __0  _0__ 0.1830_- 0.0970i __ 0.1765_-_0.1001i     __0.1827 - 0.0949i    _   0.1830_-_0.0969i
   _    _     _ _ _          _ (-3.55%, 3.20%)   _   (-0.16%,_-2.16%) __  _($<$0.01%,_-0.10%)
 _ 1   0  _0.3800 -_0.0964i    0.3786 -_0.0965i   __  0.3801 - 0.0964i _     _0.3800 - 0.0964i
  ___    _     _  _      __    (-0.37%, 0.10%)__    (0.03%, $<$0.01%)___  ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
 _     1_  0.3558 - 0.2975i    0.3536_- 0.2987i _    _0.3559_-_0.2973i        0.3568 -_0.2976i
 _  _         _      _         (-0.62%, 0.40%)_      (0.03%, -0.07%)_      _ (0.28%, 0.03%)
 __2   0   0.5741_-_0.0963i__  0.5737_- 0.0963i _  _ _0.5741 - 0.0963i_ _  __ 0.5741 - 0.0963i
              _     _    __  _(-0.07%, $<$0.01%)  _($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)   ($<$0.01%, $<$0.01%)
  _    1   0.5570 -_0.29