L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\
& + 3 \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\Psi_{BCD)F}.\label{eq:CommTwistCurlL22}\end{aligned}$$

It is now clear that is a consequence of and. The commutators and together with can be used to reduce and to

$$\begin{aligned}
\underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfrac{1}{2} (\sCurl_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BC}
 -  \tfrac{1}{3} (\sCurl_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BC}
 -  \tfrac{1}{2} \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(B}{}^{DB'C'}\Phi_{C)DB'C'},\label{eq:N20eq2}\\
(\sTwist_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tfrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}^{DF}{}_{A'B'} \Psi_{BCDF}
 + \tfrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D'} \bar\Psi_{A'B'C'D'}
 + \tfrac{4}{3} (\sTwist_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BCA'B'}.\label{eq:TwistM11Eq2}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in view of the form of we make the ansatz $$\begin{aligned}
\underset{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 P_{AA'}
 + \tfrac{4}{3} (\sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{AA'},\label{eq:M11Ansatz}\end{aligned}$$ where $P_{AA'}$ is a new spinor field. With this choice and reduce to

$$\begin{aligned}
\underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&(\sCurl_{
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\ 
 & + 3 \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\Psi_{BCD)F}.\label{eq: CommTwistCurlL22}\end{aligned}$$ 

 It is now clear that is a consequence of and. The commutators and together with can be use to repress and to 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfrac{1}{2 } (\sCurl_{1,1 } \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BC } 
  -   \tfrac{1}{3 } (\sCurl_{1,1 } \sDiv_{2,2 } \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BC } 
  -   \tfrac{1}{2 } \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(B}{}^{DB'C'}\Phi_{C)DB'C'},\label{eq: N20eq2}\\ 
 (\sTwist_{1,1 } \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tfrac{4}{5 } \underset{2,2}{L}{}^{DF}{}_{A'B' } \Psi_{BCDF } 
  + \tfrac{4}{5 } \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D' } \bar\Psi_{A'B'C'D' } 
  + \tfrac{4}{3 } (\sTwist_{1,1 } \sDiv_{2,2 } \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BCA'B'}.\label{eq: TwistM11Eq2}\end{aligned}$$ 

 Now, in view of the form of we cause the ansatz $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \underset{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 P_{AA' } 
  + \tfrac{4}{3 } (\sDiv_{2,2 } \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{AA'},\label{eq: M11Ansatz}\end{aligned}$$ where $ P_{AA'}$ is a new spinor field. With this option and reduce to 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&(\sCurl _ {
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{F'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\
& + 3 \undevset{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\Psi_{BCD)F}.\label{eq:RommTwiatCurlL22}\evd{aligned}$$

It is now clear thav is a cobsequence of and. The cummutatord and totethtr with can be usxs to reduce ahf to

$$\yejin{aligned}
\underxet{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfraw{1}{2} (\sCurl_{1,1} \undersat{1,1}{O}{})_{BE}
 -  \tfrac{1}{3} (\sCurl_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BC}
 -  \tsrac{1}{2} \uncegset{2,2}{L}{}_{(B}{}^{DB'C'}\Phi_{C)DF'C'},\lanql{eq:H20vq2}\\
(\wTwist_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tfrac{4}{5} \unserset{2,2}{L}{}^{VF}{}_{A'B'} \Psi_{BCDF}
 + \tgrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D'} \bar\Psi_{A'H'C'D'}
 + \tfrac{4}{3} (\sTwist_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BXA'B'}.\lwvel{eq:TwistM11Ed2}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in view of the form of we make the ansxtz $$\bzgin{aligned}
\oueerdgt{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 P_{AA'}
 + \thrac{4}{3} (\sQiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{AA'},\label{aq:M11Ansayz}\end{aligned}$$ wmere $'_{AA'}$ us a new spinor field. With this choice wnd reduca co

$$\begin{aligned}
\underser{2,0}{N}{}_{VC}={}&(\sCutl_{
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\ & + 3 \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\Psi_{BCD)F}.\label{eq:CommTwistCurlL22}\end{aligned}$$ It is that a consequence and. The commutators used reduce and to \underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfrac{1}{2} (\sCurl_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BC} \tfrac{1}{3} (\sCurl_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BC} - \tfrac{1}{2} (\sTwist_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tfrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}^{DF}{}_{A'B'} \Psi_{BCDF} + \tfrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D'} \bar\Psi_{A'B'C'D'} + \tfrac{4}{3} (\sTwist_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} Now, in view of the form of we make the ansatz $$\begin{aligned} \underset{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 + (\sDiv_{2,2} where is a new spinor field. With this choice and reduce to $$\begin{aligned} \underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&(\sCurl_{
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\
& + 3 \underSet{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\PsI_{BCD)F}.\LabEl{eQ:COmmTWistcurlL22}\end{aligneD}$$

it is Now clear that is a consequEnce oF aND. The COmMutatOrs and tOGeTHEr wItH cAn bE uSEd To redUce And to

$$\beGin{aligned}
\UndErSet{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfrac{1}{2} (\scUrL_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{bC}
 -  \tFrac{1}{3} (\sCurl_{1,1} \sDiV_{2,2} \unDerset{2,2}{l}{})_{Bc}
 -  \tfRAc{1}{2} \undErsEt{2,2}{L}{}_{(B}{}^{Db'C'}\Phi_{C)db'C'},\labeL{eq:N20eq2}\\
(\sTwIsT_{1,1} \UndersET{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tFRAc{4}{5} \UndeRset{2,2}{L}{}^{DF}{}_{A'B'} \Psi_{BCDF}
 + \tFRaC{4}{5} \Underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D'} \bAr\Psi_{A'b'C'd'}
 + \TfRAC{4}{3} (\sTWisT_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underSeT{2,2}{L}{})_{BCA'b'}.\Label{eq:tWiSTm11eq2}\eND{aligned}$$

Now, in View of the foRM of We make ThE anSAtz $$\begIn{aliGnED}
\unDerset{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 P_{Aa'}
 + \tfrAc{4}{3} (\sDiv_{2,2} \undErset{2,2}{L}{})_{aa'},\label{eQ:m11Ansatz}\End{aliGneD}$$ whEre $P_{aa'}$ iS a New SpINor FIeLd. WITh tHis choicE aNd ReducE to

$$\bEGIN{AligNed}
\UndeRset{2,0}{N}{}_{bC}={}&(\sCurl_{
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{ CD)}{}^{B' )}{}_ {C' }\n on umbe r\\& + 3 \underse t {2,2 }{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\ Psi_{ BC D )F}. \ la bel{e q:CommT w is t C url L2 2} \en d{ a li gned} $$
It isnow cleartha tis a consequ e nc e of and.The  commutators  an d toge th erw ith c anbe us ed tor educeand to

$ $\ b egin{a l igned}\ u nd erse t{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}= { }& \ tfrac{1}{2} (\ sCurl_ {1 , 1} \ und ers et{1,1}{M} {} )_{BC } 
 -  \t f ra c { 1 }{3 }  (\sCurl_{1,1 } \sDiv_{2, 2 } \ unders et {2, 2 }{L}{} )_{BC }- \tfrac{1}{2 } \u nderset{2 ,2}{L} { }_{(B}{ } ^{DB'C' }\Phi_ {C) DB' C'}, \ la be l{e q: N 20e q 2} \\( \sT wist_{1, 1}  \ under set{ 1 , 1 } {M}{ })_ {BCA 'B'}= {}&- \tfrac{4 }{5 } \u n der set{2 ,2}{L }{}^ {D F}{}_ {A'B'}  \Psi _{ BCDF}
 + \tfrac {4}{ 5} \under set {2 ,2} {L }{}_{ B C}{}^{ C'D '}\bar\Ps i_{A'B' C 'D' }+ \t frac{4}{3} (\sTwis t_ { 1 ,1 } \sDiv_ {2,2}\ un de r set{2,2} {L }{} )_{B C A 'B'}. \lab e l{ eq:Twist M11Eq2 } \e nd {aligne d} $$

No w,  in  vi ew of theform o f we mak e the ansatz $$\begi n {aligned}
\un d er s e t{ 1 ,1}{ M}{ }_{AA'}={}& 2 P_ { AA'} 
 +\ tf rac { 4}{3}  (\sD iv _ {2 , 2} \underset{2,2}{L }{ })_{AA '},\l abel{eq:M11An satz}\end{ a l i gned}$$wher e  $ P _{AA'}$ is a n ew sp inor field .  With th is ch oice and  reduce t o 
$$\begi n{a lig ned }
\ u n de rset{2,0}{N}{ } _ {BC} ={ }&(\sCu rl_ {
L}{}_{(AB}{}^{C'(A'}\Phi_{CD)}{}^{B')}{}_{C'}\nonumber\\
& +_3 \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(A}{}^{FA'B'}\Psi_{BCD)F}.\label{eq:CommTwistCurlL22}\end{aligned}$$

It_is now clear that_is a_consequence_of and._The_commutators and together_with can be_used to reduce and_to

$$\begin{aligned}
\underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&\tfrac{1}{2} (\sCurl_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BC}
_-_ \tfrac{1}{3} (\sCurl_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BC}
 -  \tfrac{1}{2} \underset{2,2}{L}{}_{(B}{}^{DB'C'}\Phi_{C)DB'C'},\label{eq:N20eq2}\\
(\sTwist_{1,1} \underset{1,1}{M}{})_{BCA'B'}={}&- \tfrac{4}{5} \underset{2,2}{L}{}^{DF}{}_{A'B'} \Psi_{BCDF}
 +_\tfrac{4}{5}_\underset{2,2}{L}{}_{BC}{}^{C'D'} \bar\Psi_{A'B'C'D'}
_+_\tfrac{4}{3}_(\sTwist_{1,1} \sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{BCA'B'}.\label{eq:TwistM11Eq2}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in view_of the form of we_make the_ansatz $$\begin{aligned}
\underset{1,1}{M}{}_{AA'}={}&2 P_{AA'}
 + \tfrac{4}{3} (\sDiv_{2,2} \underset{2,2}{L}{})_{AA'},\label{eq:M11Ansatz}\end{aligned}$$ where_$P_{AA'}$_is a new_spinor field. With this choice and reduce to

$$\begin{aligned}
\underset{2,0}{N}{}_{BC}={}&(\sCurl_{