-monotonic dependence of $e_*$ on $v_0$. Some experimentally observed results have been explained using a non-linear viscoelastic impact model [@Edelsten2010]. At the same time, there is the need of a simple mathematical model, which allows comparing experimental results obtained in drop impact testing with impact loads of different weights and incident velocities.

![Coefficient of restitution $e_*$ versus the impact velocity $v_0$ for articular cartilage samples of different thicknesses. Based on the experimental data and fitting curves obtained in [@Varga2007]. []{data-label="Varga2007.pdf"}](Varga2007.pdf)

A variety of mathematical models were suggested to describe the stress-strain response of articular cartilage that represents a multiphasic, structurally complex material possessing viscoelastic properties. It is long known that articular cartilage possesses viscoelastic properties [@HayesMockros1971; @Lau_et_al_2008], though there is no direct correspondence between viscoelastic parameters and parameters of the biphasic/poroelastic models of cartilage. The biphasic theory [@MowKueiLaiArmstrong1980], which models the tissue as a mixture of a solid phase and a fluid phase, has demonstrated very good agreement with experimental results in the creep and stress relaxation tests [@SoltzAteshian2000]. The objective of this study was to investigate theoretically whether the main features of articular impact observed in [@Varga2007; @Edelsten2010] could be qualitatively predicted using a linear viscoelastic theory or the linear biphasic theory.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sections \[1dsSection1\] and \[1dsSection2\], we consider in detail the viscoelastic Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell impact models, respectively. Since some elements of the presented solutions are known in the literature, we pay a particular attention to the evaluation of the contact force, $F(t)$, and impactor displacement, $x(t)$, at the time moments $t_M$ and $t_m$, when the force and displacement reach their maxima, $F_M$ and $x_m$, respectively. In Section \[1dsSection3\], we outline a closed form solution of the impact equation in the case of standard solid model. In order to get analytical approximations, we consider the standard solid model as a perturbation of the Kelvin–Vo
-monotonic dependence of $ e_*$ on $ v_0$. Some experimentally observed results have been explained use a non - analogue viscoelastic impact model [ @Edelsten2010 ]. At the like time, there be the need of a simple numerical mannequin, which allows compare experimental results obtained in drop curtain impact testing with shock burden of different weights and incident velocities. 

! [ Coefficient of restitution $ e_*$ versus the impact speed $ v_0 $ for articular cartilage samples of different thicknesses. base on the experimental data and fitting curves obtain in [ @Varga2007 ]. [ ] { data - label="Varga2007.pdf"}](Varga2007.pdf) 

 A assortment of mathematical models were suggested to describe the stress - song response of articular cartilage that represents a multiphasic, structurally complex material possessing viscoelastic properties. It is long known that articular cartilage possesses viscoelastic properties [ @HayesMockros1971; @Lau_et_al_2008 ], though there is no direct correspondence between viscoelastic parameters and parameters of the biphasic / poroelastic models of cartilage. The biphasic theory [ @MowKueiLaiArmstrong1980 ], which models the tissue as a mixture of a hearty phase and a fluid phase, has demonstrated very effective agreement with experimental results in the creep and stress relaxation tests [ @SoltzAteshian2000 ]. The aim of this study was to investigate theoretically whether the chief features of articular impact watch in [ @Varga2007; @Edelsten2010 ] could be qualitatively predicted using a linear viscoelastic theory or the linear biphasic theory. 

 The respite of the paper is organized as follows. In Sections   \[1dsSection1\ ] and \[1dsSection2\ ], we consider in contingent the viscoelastic Kelvin – Voigt and Maxwell impact model, respectively. Since some element of the presented solutions are known in the literature, we yield a particular attention to the evaluation of the contact power, $ F(t)$, and impactor displacement, $ x(t)$, at the time moments $ t_M$ and $ t_m$, when the force and displacement pass their maxima, $ F_M$ and $ x_m$, respectively. In Section   \[1dsSection3\ ], we outline a shut form solution of the impact equation in the case of standard hearty model. In decree to get analytical approximation, we consider the standard hearty model as a disruption of the Kelvin – Vo
-monltonic dependence of $e_*$ ok $v_0$. Some experimgnrally mbservsd resulgs have been explained using a non-lunear viscoelastic impxct model [@Edelsteb2010]. At rhe same tmje, therc is fme nezd of a simple msthematican model, which dluocs comparing experimental results obeained on drop impact tgstinb witg impact loads of different weighta and iicident velocitoes.

![Coefficient of restitutlon $f_*$ versus the impach velocity $c_0$ fow articular cxrtilage samples of dirferent thicknesses. Based on thd expzrimental dqtq ajg fitting cnrves jbtained in [@Ysrga2007]. []{ddta-labek="Varga2007.pdf"}](Varga2007.idf)

A tariwty of mathematical mmdels were suggestgd to descsiye the stress-strain rwsponse of drtizylaf czrvilzge thwt cepresents z multiphasuc, structurally comklev material posaessind discoelastic properties. It is long knowt tgat articular cartilage possesses viscoelastlc propereies [@HayesMockros1971; @Lau_et_al_2008], though there is no direwt cocrdspinqdbcf between viscoelastic parameters and parametqds on the biphasic/povoelastic models og fatjilage. The bipfasic cgekry [@MowKueiLaiArmshrong1980], wrich nodels tht tisxue as a mixture of a solid phase and a dluid phase, has delonstrated rery gpod abreement with experimencal reaults in thf creep aha stress relaxatkon tasts [@SoluxAteshian2000]. The objqctive of thix study was to indestigate hheorcdically whether thf maiu feadures of agticular impact observed in [@Varje2007; @Edelsten2010] coold be qualitacively predicted usyng a linear vnscoelascic thdory or thv linear uiphasic thejry.

The rest ox the paper iv organised qs fillows. Kv Sections \[1dsSevtion1\] and \[1dsSection2\], we consider in debail jhs viscoelastic Jelcin–Voigt and Macweul ymiacv modqns, respectivaly. Rinzr somd elements iw thr presented solutionv ars known in the litrrwture, we pay a pwrticular attrntion to the evalkatioi of tie conyacj force, $F(t)$, and impactor displacsment, $x(t)$, wt bhe time momegts $b_M$ agd $t_m$, when the force and displacement reach their maxima, $F_M$ and $x_m$, eespectively. In Secjiok \[1dsSection3\], wx outlyne a cloved form solution of the impact equatlon in the case of stahdard volid model. In order to get analytical approximations, we consider the standard solid model as a lertirbatpon pf the Keltii–Vo
-monotonic dependence of $e_*$ on $v_0$. Some results been explained a non-linear viscoelastic same there is the of a simple model, which allows comparing experimental results in drop impact testing with impact loads of different weights and incident velocities. of restitution $e_*$ versus the impact velocity $v_0$ for articular cartilage samples of thicknesses. on experimental and fitting curves obtained in [@Varga2007]. []{data-label="Varga2007.pdf"}](Varga2007.pdf) A variety of mathematical models were suggested to describe stress-strain response of articular cartilage that represents a structurally complex material possessing properties. It is long known articular possesses viscoelastic [@HayesMockros1971; though is no direct between viscoelastic parameters and parameters of the biphasic/poroelastic models of cartilage. The biphasic theory [@MowKueiLaiArmstrong1980], which models tissue as of a phase a phase, has demonstrated agreement with experimental results in the relaxation tests [@SoltzAteshian2000]. The objective of this study to investigate whether the main features of articular observed in [@Varga2007; @Edelsten2010] could be qualitatively predicted a linear viscoelastic theory or the linear biphasic theory. The rest of the paper is follows. In Sections \[1dsSection1\] \[1dsSection2\], we consider detail viscoelastic and impact models, Since some elements of the presented solutions are known in the we pay a particular attention to the evaluation of the $F(t)$, impactor displacement, $x(t)$, the time moments $t_M$ $t_m$, the force and displacement maxima, and Section we a closed form solution the impact equation in the of standard solid model. approximations, we consider the standard solid model as perturbation of the Kelvin–Vo
-monotonic dependence of $e_*$ on $v_0$. some experiMentaLly ObsErVed rEsulTs have been explAIned Using a non-linear viscoelAstic ImPAct mODeL [@EdelSten2010]. At tHE sAME tiMe, ThEre Is THe Need oF a sImple maThematical ModEl, Which allows cOMpAring experImeNtal results oBtaIned in DrOp iMPact tEstIng wiTh impaCT loads Of differeNt WEights ANd incidENT vElocIties.

![Coefficient oF ReSTitution $e_*$ versuS the imPaCT vELOciTy $v_0$ For articulAr CartiLAge sampLEs OF DIffERent thicknessEs. Based on thE ExpErimenTaL daTA and fiTting CuRVes Obtained in [@VArga2007]. []{Data-label="varga2007.pDF"}](Varga2007.pDF)

A varieTy of maTheMatIcal MOdElS weRe SUggEStEd tO DesCribe the StReSs-strAin rESPONse oF arTicuLar caRtilage that rePreSentS A muLtiphAsic, sTrucTuRally CompleX mateRiAl possessing visCoelAstic propErtIeS. It Is Long kNOwn thaT arTicUlar carTilage pOSseSsES VIsCoelastic propertieS [@HAYEsmockros1971; @LAu_et_al_2008], THoUgH There is nO dIreCt coRREsponDencE BeTween visCoelasTIc PaRameterS aNd paraMeTerS of The biPHasiC/poroeLastic moDels oF Cartilage. The biPHasic theory [@MoWkuEIlaIarmsTroNg1980], which modeLs thE TissUe as A MiXtuRE of a sOlid pHaSE aND a fluid phase, has demoNsTrated Very gOod agreement wIth experimENTAl resultS in tHE cREep and stress reLaxatIon tests [@SoLTzAteshiAn2000]. The ObjectivE of this stUDY was to inVesTigAte TheOREtIcally whether THE maiN fEatures Of aRticulaR imPacT obSerVeD in [@Varga2007; @EDelsten2010] cOuLd Be QuAliTativELy predicTeD usInG a lInear VIscoelAstic TheoRy Or THe lInear biPHaSIC theOrY.

THe reSt oF tHe papEr is ORgaNized as Follows. In secTIons \[1DsseCtion1\] anD \[1dsSection2\], we cOnSider in detAiL thE viscoELAstic KelVin–Voigt and Maxwell impacT Models, rEspEctivEly. SInce some eLemEnts of The PResentEd soluTions ArE knOWN in thE LItEraTuRe, we pay a paRTIcuLar atTeNtioN to the eValuation of the contACt fOrce, $F(t)$, and impaCtoR disPLAcEmeNT, $x(T)$, At tHe TIme MOMents $t_M$ and $t_m$, wheN the force aNd DIsPlacement rEAch ThEir maxiMa, $F_M$ and $X_m$, resPEctivelY. In SectioN \[1dsSectioN3\], wE outLINe a Closed form Solution Of the impaCT equaTIoN in thE caSe of stAnDarD soliD model. iN orDer to Get anaLyTical aPproxImAtions, we Consider the standard soliD model As a peRtuRbation of The kElvIn–Vo
-monotonic dependence of $ e_*$ on $v _0$.Som e e xp erim enta lly observed r e sult s have been explainedusing  a non- l in ear v iscoela s ti c imp ac tmod el [@ Edels ten 2010].At the sam e t im e, there ist he  need of a  si mple mathema tic al mod el , w h ich a llo ws co mparin g  exper imental r es u lts ob t ained i n dr op i mpact testing wit h  i m pact loads ofdiffer en t  w e i ght s a nd inciden tveloc i ties.
! [C o e f fic i ent of restit ution $e_*$ ver sus th eimp a ct vel ocity  $ v _0$  for articu larcartilage  sampl e s of di f ferentthickn ess es.  Bas e don  th ee xpe r im ent a l d ata andfi tt ing c urve s o b tain edin [ @Varg a2007]. []{da ta- labe l ="V arga2 007.p df"} ]( Varga 2007.p df)
Avariety of math emat ical mode lswe resu ggest e d to d esc rib e the s tress-s t rai nr e s po nse of articular c ar t i la ge thatrepres e nt sa  multiph as ic,  str u c tural ly c o mp lex mate rial p o ss es sing vi sc oelast ic  pr ope rties .  Itis lon g knownthata rticular carti l age possesses vi s c oe l asti c p roperties [ @Hay e sMoc kros 1 97 1;@ Lau_e t_al_ 20 0 8] ,  though there is no  d irectcorre spondence bet ween visco e l a stic par amet e rs and parameters  of t he biphasi c /poroela sticmodels o f cartila g e . The bi pha sic  th eor y [@ MowKueiLaiArm s t rong 19 80], wh ich  models  th e t iss ueas  a mixtur e of a s ol id  p ha seand a fluid ph as e,ha s d emons t ratedverygood  a gr e eme nt with ex p e rime nt al  res ult sin th e cr e epand str ess relax ati o n te st s[@Soltz Ateshian2000] .The object iv e o f this s tudy was  to investigate theoret i cally w het her t he m ain featu res  of ar tic u lar im pact o bserv ed  in [ @Varg a 2 00 7;@E delsten201 0 ]  co uld b equal itative ly predicted using a l inear viscoel ast ic t h e or y o r  t h e l in e arb i phasic theory.
The restof th e paper is org an ized as  follow s. In Section s \[1dsSe ction1\]an d \[ 1 d sSe ction2\],we consi der in de t ail t h evisco ela stic K el vin –Voig t andM axw ell i mpactmo dels,respe ct ively. S ince some elements of t he pre sente d s olutionsare kno wn in the  lit erature, w e p aya par tic u lar a tten t io n t o  theeval u ation oft he  co n t ac t force, $F ( t ) $,and i mpa c tor di spla cement, $x(t)$, a t  the time mome nts$ t _M$  an d  $t_ m$ , when the for cean d displace me nt reach th eir maxi ma ,  $F_M $ and$x_m$,  respec t i ve l y. InSect ion  \[1dsSec tio n3 \ ], we o ut li n e a cl osed  f orm so lution of t h e  impact equation  in t h e  case ofstand ar d solid mode l. In orde r to get an alytic al a pprox imation s,  we co nsi de r the stan d ard solid  mode l as ape rtur bat ion of  the K elvin –Vo
-monotonic dependence_of $e_*$_on $v_0$. Some experimentally_observed results_have_been explained_using_a non-linear viscoelastic_impact model [@Edelsten2010]._At the same time,_there is the_need_of a simple mathematical model, which allows comparing experimental results obtained in drop impact_testing_with impact_loads_of_different weights and incident velocities.

![Coefficient_of restitution $e_*$ versus the_impact velocity_$v_0$ for articular cartilage samples of different thicknesses._Based_on the experimental_data and fitting curves obtained in [@Varga2007]. []{data-label="Varga2007.pdf"}](Varga2007.pdf)

A variety_of mathematical models were suggested to_describe the stress-strain_response_of_articular cartilage that represents_a multiphasic, structurally complex material possessing_viscoelastic properties. It is long known_that articular cartilage possesses viscoelastic properties [@HayesMockros1971;_@Lau_et_al_2008], though there is no direct_correspondence between viscoelastic parameters and_parameters of_the biphasic/poroelastic models of cartilage._The biphasic theory_[@MowKueiLaiArmstrong1980], which_models the tissue_as a mixture of a solid_phase and a_fluid phase, has demonstrated very good_agreement_with experimental results_in_the_creep and_stress relaxation tests_[@SoltzAteshian2000]._The objective_of_this study was to investigate theoretically_whether_the main features of articular impact observed_in [@Varga2007; @Edelsten2010] could_be_qualitatively predicted using a_linear viscoelastic theory or the_linear biphasic theory.

The rest of the_paper is_organized as_follows. In Sections \[1dsSection1\] and \[1dsSection2\], we consider in detail the viscoelastic_Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell impact models, respectively._Since some elements of_the presented_solutions_are known in_the_literature, we_pay a particular attention to the evaluation_of the_contact force, $F(t)$, and impactor displacement,_$x(t)$, at the time_moments_$t_M$ and $t_m$, when the force_and displacement reach their maxima, $F_M$_and $x_m$, respectively. In Section \[1dsSection3\],_we_outline_a closed form solution of_the impact equation in the case_of standard solid_model. In order to get analytical approximations,_we_consider the standard solid model as_a_perturbation of the Kelvin–Vo