 to test whether a process is white noise. Finally, the **crossing statistic** [@ylvisaker1965expected] measures the probability that a process crosses its mean per unit of time. In all three cases, low values for these criteria imply a fast mean-reversion.

Predictability {#subsec:pred}
--------------

We briefly recall the canonical decomposition derived in [@box1977cam]. Suppose that $x_t$ follows the recursion: \[eq:ar1\] x\_t= \_[t-1]{} + \_t, where $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ is a predictor of $x_t$ built upon past values of the process recorded up to $t-1$, and $\varepsilon_t$ is a vector of i.i.d. Gaussian noise with zero mean and covariance $\Sigma \in \symm_n$ independent of all variables $(x_{r})_{r<t}$. The canonical analysis in [@box1977cam] starts as follows.

### Univariate case

Suppose $n=1$ and thus $\Sigma\in\RR_+$, Equation (\[eq:ar1\]) leads thus to $$\Expect[x_t^2]=\Expect[\hat{x}_{t-1}^2]+\Expect{[\varepsilon_t^2]}, \text{ thus } 1=\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}+\frac{\Sigma}{\sigma^2},$$ by introducing the variances $\sigma^2$ and $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of $x_t$ and $\hat{x}_t$ respectively. @box1977cam measure the *predictability* of $x_t$ by the ratio $$\lambda\defeq\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}.$$ The intuition behind this variance ratio is simple: when it is small the variance of the noise dominates that of $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ and $x_t$ is dominated by the noise term; when it is large, $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ dominates the noise and $x_t$ can be accurately predicted on average.

### Multivariate case

Suppose $n>1$ and consider now the univariate process $(y^Tx_t)_{t}$ with weights $y\in\RR^{n}$. Using (\[eq:ar1\]) we know that $y^Tx_t =y^T\hat{x}_{
to test whether a process is white noise. ultimately, the * * thwart statistic * *   [ @ylvisaker1965expected ] measures the probability that a process crosses its mean per whole of time. In all three cases, broken value for these criteria entail a fast mean - reversion. 

 Predictability { # subsec: pred } 
 -------------- 

 We concisely recall the canonical decomposition derived in   [ @box1977cam ]. presuppose that $ x_t$ follows the recursion: \[eq: ar1\ ] x\_t= \_[t-1 ] { } + \_t, where $ \hat{x}_{t-1}$ is a predictor of $ x_t$ built upon past values of the process record up to $ t-1 $, and $ \varepsilon_t$ is a vector of i.i.d. Gaussian noise with zero mean and covariance $ \Sigma \in \symm_n$ independent of all variables $ (x_{r})_{r < t}$. The canonic analysis in [ @box1977cam ] starts as follows. 

 # # # Univariate case 

 think $ n=1 $ and thus $ \Sigma\in\RR_+$, Equation (\[eq: ar1\ ]) leads thus to $ $ \Expect[x_t^2]=\Expect[\hat{x}_{t-1}^2]+\Expect{[\varepsilon_t^2 ] }, \text { thus } 1=\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}+\frac{\Sigma}{\sigma^2},$$ by introducing the variation $ \sigma^2 $ and $ \hat{\sigma}^2 $ of $ x_t$ and $ \hat{x}_t$ respectively.   @box1977cam measure the * predictability * of $ x_t$ by the ratio $ $ \lambda\defeq\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}.$$ The intuition behind this variance ratio is simple: when it is small the variance of the noise dominates that of $ \hat{x}_{t-1}$ and $ x_t$ is dominated by the noise term; when it is large, $ \hat{x}_{t-1}$ dominates the noise and $ x_t$ can be accurately predicted on average. 

 # # # Multivariate event 

 Suppose $ n>1 $ and consider immediately the univariate procedure $ (y^Tx_t)_{t}$ with weights $ y\in\RR^{n}$. Using   (\[eq: ar1\ ]) we know that $ y^Tx_t = y^T\hat{x } _ {
 to test whether a process ls white noise. Fnbally, vhe **croasing stxtistic** [@ylvisaker1965expected] meaduees tye probability that a orocess cgosses itw meen per unit of tmje. In all thrsc caszs, low values fot these critaria imply a fdsg lean-reversion.

Predictability {#subsec:pwed}
--------------

We btiffly recall thg canpgicam decomposition derived in [@box1977cam]. Shppose uhat $x_t$ follows thr recursion: \[eq:ar1\] x\_t= \_[t-1]{} + \_t, wjere $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ is a predichor of $x_t$ bojlt ypon past vauues of tht 'rocess reckrded up to $t-1$, and $\varepsilon_t$ ir a vzctor of i.i.e. Taudvian noise xith zvro mean and gpvariatce $\Sigka \in \symm_n$ incepxndebt of all variables $(x_{c})_{r<t}$. The canonical anwlysis in [@bkx1977cam] starts as filoows.

### Onivasiatd care

Shp'oss $n=1$ anf tius $\Sigma\in\DR_+$, Equation (\[eq:ar1\]) leads thus to $$\Evirct[x_t^2]=\Expect[\hzt{x}_{t-1}^2]+\Ex[est{[\varepsilon_t^2]}, \text{ thus } 1=\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sicma^2}+\rrac{\Sigma}{\sigma^2},$$ by introeucing the variances $\digma^2$ and $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of $x_t$ and $\hat{x}_t$ respectively. @box1977cam measgre tie *prtdlgtabkoihy* of $x_t$ by the ratio $$\lambda\defeq\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\fjgka^2}.$$ The intuition behind thix gatyance ratio ir simple: shen it is small tje variwnce if the noyse cominates that of $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ and $x_t$ is dominctee by the noise terl; when it ir latge, $\hay{x}_{t-1}$ dominates the noise and $x_t$ can be wccuratelg predicted on avdrane.

### Kultivariate case

Suppose $n>1$ and consmder uow the jnivsriate process $(y^Hx_t)_{t}$ with weights $y\in\RR^{n}$. Usiny (\[eq:ar1\]) we know tjat $y^Tx_t =y^T\hat{x}_{
to test whether a process is white the statistic** [@ylvisaker1965expected] the probability that per of time. In three cases, low for these criteria imply a fast Predictability {#subsec:pred} -------------- We briefly recall the canonical decomposition derived in [@box1977cam]. Suppose $x_t$ follows the recursion: \[eq:ar1\] x\_t= \_[t-1]{} + \_t, where $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ is a of built past of the process recorded up to $t-1$, and $\varepsilon_t$ is a vector of i.i.d. Gaussian noise zero mean and covariance $\Sigma \in \symm_n$ independent all variables $(x_{r})_{r<t}$. The analysis in [@box1977cam] starts as ### case Suppose and $\Sigma\in\RR_+$, (\[eq:ar1\]) leads thus $$\Expect[x_t^2]=\Expect[\hat{x}_{t-1}^2]+\Expect{[\varepsilon_t^2]}, \text{ thus } 1=\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}+\frac{\Sigma}{\sigma^2},$$ by introducing the variances $\sigma^2$ and $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of $x_t$ and $\hat{x}_t$ respectively. measure the $x_t$ by ratio The behind this variance simple: when it is small the noise dominates that of $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ and $x_t$ is by the term; when it is large, $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ the noise and $x_t$ can be accurately predicted average. ### Multivariate case Suppose $n>1$ and consider now the univariate process $(y^Tx_t)_{t}$ with weights (\[eq:ar1\]) we know that =y^T\hat{x}_{
 to test whether a process is whIte noise. FiNally, The **CroSsIng sTatiStic** [@ylvisaker1965eXPectEd] measures the probabiliTy thaT a PRoceSS cRosseS its meaN PeR UNit Of TiMe. IN aLL tHree cAseS, low valUes for thesE crItEria imply a faST mEan-reversiOn.

PRedictabilitY {#suBsec:prEd}
--------------

we bRIefly RecAll thE canonICal decOmpositioN dERived iN [@Box1977cam]. SUPPoSe thAt $x_t$ follows the recURsIOn: \[eq:ar1\] x\_t= \_[t-1]{} + \_t, wherE $\hat{x}_{t-1}$ Is A PrEDIctOr oF $x_t$ built upOn Past vALues of tHE pROCEss REcorded up to $t-1$, aNd $\varepsiloN_T$ is A vectoR oF i.i.D. gaussiAn noiSe WIth Zero mean and CovaRiance $\SigMa \in \syMM_n$ indepENdent of All varIabLes $(X_{r})_{r<t}$. tHe CaNonIcAL anALySis IN [@boX1977cam] starTs As FolloWs.

### UnIVARIate CasE

SupPose $n=1$ And thus $\Sigma\iN\RR_+$, equaTIon (\[Eq:ar1\]) lEads tHus tO $$\EXpect[X_t^2]=\ExpeCt[\hat{X}_{t-1}^2]+\expect{[\varepsiloN_t^2]}, \teXt{ thus } 1=\fraC{\haT{\sIgmA}^2}{\sIgma^2}+\fRAc{\SigmA}{\siGma^2},$$ By introDucing tHE vaRiANCEs $\Sigma^2$ and $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of $X_t$ AND $\hAt{x}_t$ respEctiveLY. @bOx1977CAm measurE tHe *pRediCTAbiliTy* of $X_T$ bY the ratiO $$\lambdA\DeFeQ\frac{\haT{\sIgma}^2}{\siGmA^2}.$$ ThE inTuitiON behInd thiS variancE ratiO Is simple: when it IS small the variANcE OF tHE noiSe dOminates thaT of $\hAT{x}_{t-1}$ aNd $x_t$ IS dOmiNAted bY the nOiSE tERm; when it is large, $\hat{x}_{T-1}$ dOminatEs the Noise and $x_t$ can Be accurateLY PRedicted On avERaGE.

### Multivariate cAse

SuPpose $n>1$ and cONsider noW the uNivariatE process $(y^tX_T)_{t}$ with weIghTs $y\In\Rr^{n}$. USINg (\[Eq:ar1\]) we know thaT $Y^tx_t =y^t\hAt{x}_{
 to test whether a process  is whitenoise . F ina ll y, t he * *crossing stat i stic ** [@ylvisaker1965expe cted]  m e asur e sthe p robabil i ty t hat  a  p roc es s  c rosse s i ts mean  per unitofti me. In all t h re e cases, l owvalues for t hes e crit er iai mplya f ast m ean-re v ersion .

Predic ta b ility{ #subsec : p re d}
- -------------

We br i efly recall th e cano ni c al d eco mpo sition der iv ed in [@box19 7 7c a m ] . S u ppose that $x _t$ follows the  recur si on: \[eq:a r1\]x\ _ t=\_[t-1]{} +  \_t , where $ \hat{x } _{t-1}$ is a pr edicto r o f $ x_t$ bu il t u po n  pa s tval u esof the p ro ce ss re cord e d u p to  $t -1$,  and$\varepsilon_ t$is a vec tor o f i.i .d.Ga ussia n nois e wit hzero mean and c ovar iance $\S igm a\in  \ symm_ n $ inde pen den t of al l varia b les  $ ( x _ {r })_{r<t}$. The can on i c al  analysi s in [ @ bo x1 9 77cam] s ta rts  asf o llows .

# # #Univaria te cas e 
Su ppose $ n= 1$ and  t hus  $\ Sigma \ in\R R_+$,Equation  (\[e q :ar1\]) leadst hus to $$\Exp e ct [ x _t ^ 2]=\ Exp ect[\hat{x} _{t- 1 }^2] +\Ex p ec t{[ \ varep silon _t ^ 2] } , \text{ thus } 1=\ fr ac{\ha t{\si gma}^2}{\sigm a^2}+\frac { \ S igma}{\s igma ^ 2} , $$ by introduc ing t he varianc e s $\sigm a^2$and $\ha t{\sigma} ^ 2 $ of $x_ t$and  $\ hat { x }_ t$ respective l y . @b ox 1977cam  me asure t he*pr edi cta bi lity* of$x_t$ by  t he  r at io$$\la m bda\defe q\ fra c{ \ha t{\si g ma}^2} {\sig ma^2 }. $$ The  intuit i on b ehin dth is v ari an ce ra tioi s s imple:when it i s s m allth evarianc e of the nois edominatesth atof $\h a t {x}_{t-1 }$ and $x_t$ is dominat e d by th e n oiseterm ; when it  is  large , $ \ hat{x} _{t-1} $ dom in ate s the n o i se  an d$x_t$ canb e  ac curat el y pr edicted  on average.

###M ult ivariate case 

S uppo s e  $ n>1 $  a n d c on s ide r now the univari ate proces s$ (y ^Tx_t)_{t} $  wi th  weight s $y\in \RR^{ n }$. Usi ng (\[eq: ar1\]) we  k nowt h at$y^Tx_t =y ^T\hat{x }_{
 to_test whether_a process is white_noise. Finally,_the_**crossing statistic** [@ylvisaker1965expected]_measures_the probability that_a process crosses_its mean per unit_of time. In_all_three cases, low values for these criteria imply a fast mean-reversion.

Predictability {#subsec:pred}
--------------

We briefly recall_the_canonical decomposition_derived_in [@box1977cam]._Suppose that $x_t$ follows the_recursion: \[eq:ar1\] x\_t= \_[t-1]{} +_\_t, where_$\hat{x}_{t-1}$ is a predictor of $x_t$ built upon_past_values of the_process recorded up to $t-1$, and $\varepsilon_t$ is a_vector of i.i.d. Gaussian noise with_zero mean and_covariance_$\Sigma_\in \symm_n$ independent of_all variables $(x_{r})_{r<t}$. The canonical analysis_in [@box1977cam] starts as follows.

### Univariate_case

Suppose $n=1$ and thus $\Sigma\in\RR_+$, Equation (\[eq:ar1\])_leads thus to $$\Expect[x_t^2]=\Expect[\hat{x}_{t-1}^2]+\Expect{[\varepsilon_t^2]}, \text{ thus_} 1=\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}+\frac{\Sigma}{\sigma^2},$$ by introducing the_variances $\sigma^2$_and $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of $x_t$ and_$\hat{x}_t$ respectively. @box1977cam measure_the *predictability*_of $x_t$ by_the ratio $$\lambda\defeq\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{\sigma^2}.$$ The intuition behind_this variance ratio_is simple: when it is small_the_variance of the_noise_dominates_that of_$\hat{x}_{t-1}$ and $x_t$_is_dominated by_the_noise term; when it is large,_$\hat{x}_{t-1}$_dominates the noise and $x_t$ can be_accurately predicted on average.

###_Multivariate_case

Suppose $n>1$ and consider_now the univariate process $(y^Tx_t)_{t}$_with weights $y\in\RR^{n}$. Using (\[eq:ar1\]) we know_that $y^Tx_t_=y^T\hat{x}_{