
4.  The bursts consist of multiple emission lanes that exhibit a low–high–low frequency drift pattern in the radio dynamic spectrum with a moderate relative frequency drift rate of $\dot{\nu}/\nu \lesssim 0.2 \rm{s}^{-1}$, which is typical for intermediate drift bursts in the decimetric wavelength range.

5.  Imaging at all time and frequency pixels where the bursts are present shows that the radio source propagates at a speed of 1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection. The low–high–low frequency drift pattern corresponds to the source firstly moving downward along the flaring loop before it reaching the lowest point and bouncing back upward.

6.  Some of the emission lanes consist of multitudes of subsecond-period oscillations in emission frequency with an amplitude of 1[$\delta\nu/\nu\approx$1–2$\%$]{}.

What is the nature of the propagating radio source that is reflected at or near the flare ribbon? First, it is most likely associated with fundamental plasma radiation, which is due to the nonlinear conversion from plasma Langmuir waves induced by the presence of nonthermal electrons. This is because that the bursts have a narrow frequency bandwidth ($\delta \nu/\nu \approx 6\%$) and fast temporally varying features, and are nearly 100% polarized. Second, the propagation speed of the emission source (1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection) is too slow for electron beams emitting type III bursts (which usually propagate at 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, see, e.g., @2013ApJ...763L..21C [@2018ApJ...866...62C; @2017ApJ...851..151M]), but 1[likely]{} too fast for slow-mode magnetosonic waves, 1[unless the temperature in the source reaches over $\sim$50 MK]{}. The most probable candidate for the radio-emission-carrying disturbance is thus Alfvénic or fast-mode magnetosonic waves, which propagate at $\sim$1–4 Mm s$^{-1}$ under typical coronal conditions. The Alfvénic or fast-mode waves can be excited by a broadband driver, such as the impulsive flare energy release, and propagate outward from the site of energy release. For fast-mode waves to achieve focused, field-aligned energy transport, an overdense magnetic tube would be required to act as a waveguide, which, in our case, can be the
4.   The bursts consist of multiple emission lanes that parade a depleted – high – low frequency drift pattern in the radio receiver dynamic spectrum with a moderate relative frequency drift rate of $ \dot{\nu}/\nu \lesssim 0.2 \rm{s}^{-1}$, which is distinctive for average drift bursts in the decimetric wavelength range. 

 5.   Imaging at all time and frequency pixels where the bursts are present shows that the radio receiver source propagates at a speed of 1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection. The broken – high – depleted frequency drift pattern corresponds to the source first moving downward along the flaring iteration before it reaching the lowest period and bouncing back up. 

 6.   Some of the emission lanes consist of multitudes of subsecond - period cycle in emission frequency with an amplitude of 1[$\delta\nu/\nu\approx$1–2$\%$ ] { }. 

 What is the nature of the propagating radio source that is reflected at or near the flare ribbon? First, it is most likely associated with fundamental plasma radiation, which is due to the nonlinear conversion from plasma Langmuir waves induced by the presence of nonthermal electrons. This is because that the explosion have a narrow frequency bandwidth ($ \delta \nu/\nu \approx 6\%$) and fast temporally vary feature, and are nearly 100% polarized. Second, the propagation focal ratio of the emission source (1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection) is too dull for electron beams emitting type III bursts (which usually propagate at 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, visualize, e.g., @2013ApJ... 763L.. 21C [ @2018ApJ... 866... 62C; @2017ApJ... 851.. 151 M ]), but 1[likely ] { } too fast for slow - mode magnetosonic waves, 1[unless the temperature in the source reaches over $ \sim$50 MK ] { }. The about probable campaigner for the radio receiver - emission - carrying disturbance is thus Alfvénic or fast - mode magnetosonic waves, which propagate at $ \sim$1–4 Mm s$^{-1}$ under distinctive coronal conditions. The Alfvénic or flying - mode waves can be agitate by a broadband driver, such as the impulsive flare department of energy release, and propagate outward from the site of energy release. For debauched - mode wave to achieve focused, field - align energy transport, an overdense charismatic tube would be required to act as a waveguide, which, in our case, can be the

4.  Tje bursts consist of muluiple emission lauws thav exhibjt a low–figh–low frequency drift pattxrn un tht radio dynamic speztrum witj a modeeate eelative fcsquency drift vate mh $\dot{\nu}/\nu \lessslm 0.2 \rm{s}^{-1}$, whiwh is typical xof nntermediate drift bursts in the decymetric wwvelength rangg.

5.  Imsding at all time and frequency pixels shere tie bursts are ptesent shows that the radil sokrce propagates at a speed of 1–2 Mm w$^{-1}$ in projectkon. The low–high–low fresuency drift pattern correspondr to che source diestpi moving dowiward wlong the flaring lomp befote it reaching thx loqest point and bounciig back upward.

6.  Some of the ekiasion lanes consiwt of moltitgdes if rubaerons-periof oacillationa in emissiin frequency with am wnplitude of 1[$\dslta\nu/\gu\wpprox$1–2$\%$]{}.

What is the nature of the propagauing dadio source that is redlected at or near thg flare rifbon? First, it is most likely associated with funddmentel plcwma rxeiwtion, which is due to the nonlinear conversiog ftok plasma Langmmir waves induced ny tng presence of vonthexjam electrons. This id becaufe thqt the buwsts have a narrow frequency babdwidth ($\deltc \ny/\nu \approx 6\%$) and fadt temporaluy vsryinb features, and are nearuy 100% lolarized. Sfcond, the oropagation speea on tve emission source (1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ ig projectmon) ix too suow gor elqctron beals emldting type III burdts (wkich gsually prlpagate at 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, see, e.g., @2013ApJ...763L..21C [@2018ApJ...866...62C; @2017ApJ...851..151M]), but 1[likeky]{} tom fast fjr slpw-mode magnetjsonic waves, 1[uuless thz tempdrature in the sonrce reaches over $\sim$50 MK]{}. Dje most probeble candydatw foe the rxaio-emission-cartying disnuxbance is thus Alfvénic or fest-muse magnetosonic waces, which propabatd ae $\dik$1–4 Ik s$^{-1}$ under ty[icau cutonal conditions. Ghe Slfvénic or fast-mode favea can be excited bu w broadbqnd drivqr, such as thr impulsive flare tnergy reuease, anq propagate outward from the sjte of enfrgn release. For fasb-modg waves to cchieve focused, field-aligned energy tranwport, an overdensg magnetic tube would ne required vo act as a wavaguide, which, in our xase, can be the
4. The bursts consist of multiple emission exhibit low–high–low frequency pattern in the moderate frequency drift rate $\dot{\nu}/\nu \lesssim 0.2 which is typical for intermediate drift in the decimetric wavelength range. 5. Imaging at all time and frequency pixels the bursts are present shows that the radio source propagates at a speed 1–2 s$^{-1}$ projection. low–high–low frequency drift pattern corresponds to the source firstly moving downward along the flaring loop before reaching the lowest point and bouncing back upward. Some of the emission consist of multitudes of subsecond-period in frequency with amplitude 1[$\delta\nu/\nu\approx$1–2$\%$]{}. is the nature the propagating radio source that is reflected at or near the flare ribbon? First, it is most associated with radiation, which due the conversion from plasma induced by the presence of nonthermal because that the bursts have a narrow frequency ($\delta \nu/\nu 6\%$) and fast temporally varying features, are nearly 100% polarized. Second, the propagation speed the emission source (1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection) is too slow for electron beams emitting bursts (which usually propagate 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, see, e.g., [@2018ApJ...866...62C; but too for slow-mode waves, 1[unless the temperature in the source reaches over $\sim$50 MK]{}. most probable candidate for the radio-emission-carrying disturbance is thus Alfvénic magnetosonic which propagate at Mm s$^{-1}$ under typical conditions. Alfvénic or fast-mode waves excited a as impulsive energy release, and propagate from the site of energy For fast-mode waves to an overdense magnetic tube would be required to as a waveguide, which, in our case, be the

4.  The bursts consist of multiplE emission lAnes tHat ExhIbIt a lOw–hiGh–low frequency DRift Pattern in the radio dynamIc speCtRUm wiTH a ModerAte relaTIvE FReqUeNcY drIfT RaTe of $\dOt{\nU}/\nu \lessSim 0.2 \rm{s}^{-1}$, whicH is TyPical for inteRMeDiate drift BurSts in the deciMetRic wavElEngTH rangE.

5.  ImAging At all tIMe and fRequency pIxELs wherE The bursTS ArE preSent shows that the rADiO Source propagatEs at a sPeED oF 1–2 mM s$^{-1}$ iN prOjection. ThE lOw–higH–Low freqUEnCY DRifT Pattern corresPonds to the sOUrcE firstLy MovINg downWard aLoNG thE flaring looP befOre it reacHing thE Lowest pOInt and bOuncinG baCk uPwarD.

6.  soMe Of tHe EMisSIoN laNEs cOnsist of MuLtItudeS of sUBSECond-PerIod oScillAtions in emissIon FreqUEncY with An ampLituDe Of 1[$\delTa\nu/\nu\ApproX$1–2$\%$]{}.

WHat is the nature oF the PropagatiNg rAdIo sOuRce thAT is refLecTed At or neaR the flaRE riBbON? fIrSt, it is most likely asSoCIAtEd with fuNdamenTAl PlASma radiaTiOn, wHich IS Due to The nONlInear conVersioN FrOm Plasma LAnGmuir wAvEs iNduCed by THe prEsence Of nontheRmal eLEctrons. This is bECause that the bURsTS HaVE a naRroW frequency bAndwIDth ($\dElta \NU/\nU \apPRox 6\%$) anD fast TeMPoRAlly varying features, AnD are neArly 100% pOlarized. SeconD, the propagATIOn speed oF the EMiSSion source (1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$ iN projEction) is toO Slow for eLectrOn beams eMitting tyPE iII burstS (whIch UsuAllY PRoPagate at 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, see, E.G., @2013apJ...763L..21c [@2018APJ...866...62C; @2017ApJ...851..151M]), But 1[Likely]{} tOo fAst For SloW-mOde magnetOsonic waVeS, 1[uNlEsS thE tempERature in ThE soUrCe rEacheS Over $\siM$50 MK]{}. ThE mosT pRoBAblE candidATe FOR the RaDiO-emiSsiOn-CarryIng dIStuRbance iS thus AlfvÉniC Or faSt-MoDe magneTosonic waves, wHiCh propagatE aT $\siM$1–4 Mm s$^{-1}$ unDER typical Coronal conditions. The AlfVÉnic or fAst-Mode wAves Can be exciTed By a broAdbANd drivEr, such As the ImPulSIVe flaRE EnErgY rElease, and pROPagAte ouTwArd fRom the sIte of energy release. fOr fAst-mode waves tO acHievE FOcUseD, FiELd-aLiGNed ENErgy transport, an Overdense mAgNEtIc tube woulD Be rEqUired to Act as a wAveguIDe, which, In our case, Can be the

4.  The bursts consist of  multipleemiss ion  la ne s th at e xhibit a low–h i gh–l ow frequency drift pat ternin ther ad io dy namic s p ec t r umwi th  amo d er ate r ela tive fr equency dr ift  r ate of $\dot { \n u}/\nu \le sss im 0.2 \rm{s }^{ -1}$,wh ich is ty pic al fo r inte r mediat e drift b ur s ts int he deci m e tr ic w avelength range.5.  Imaging at al l time  a n df r equ enc y pixels w he re th e  bursts ar e p res e nt shows that  the radios our ce pro pa gat e s at a  spee do f 1 –2 Mm s$^{- 1}$in projec tion.T he low– h igh–low  frequ enc y d rift pa tt ern  c o rre s po nds tothe sour ce  f irstl y mo v i n g  dow nwa rd a longthe flaring l oop  bef o reit re achin g th elowes t poin t and  b ouncing back up ward .

6.  So meof  th eemiss i on lan escon sist of  multit u des  o f s ub second-period osci ll a t io ns in em ission fr eq u ency wit hanampl i t ude o f 1[ $ \d elta\nu/ \nu\ap p ro x$ 1–2$\%$ ]{ }.

Wh at  is  th e nat u re o f thepropagat ing r a dio source tha t  is reflected at o rn earthe  flare ribb on?F irst , it is  mo s t lik ely a ss o ci a ted with fundamenta lplasma  radi ation, whichis due tot h e  nonline ar c o nv e rsion from pla sma L angmuir wa v es induc ed by  the pre sence ofn o nthermal  el ect ron s.T h is  is because t h a t th eburstshav e a nar row  fr equ enc ybandwidth  ($\delt a\n u/ \n u \ appro x  6\%$) a nd  fa st  te mpora l ly var yingfeat ur es ,  an d are n e ar l y  100 %po lari zed .Secon d, t h e p ropagat ion speed  of theem is sion so urce (1–2 Mms$ ^{-1}$ inpr oje ction) i s too sl ow for electron beams e m ittingtyp e III  bur sts (whic h u sually  pr o pagate  at 0. 1$c$– 0. 5$c $ ,  see, e .g .,@2 013ApJ...7 6 3 L.. 21C [ @2 018A pJ...86 6...62C; @2017ApJ. . .85 1..151M]), bu t 1 [lik e l y] {}t oo fas tf ors l ow-mode magneto sonic wave s, 1[ unless the tem pe raturein thesourc e  reache s over $\ sim$50 MK ]{ }. T h e  mo st probabl e candid ate for t h e rad i o- emiss ion -carry in g d istur bancei s t hus A lfvéni cor fas t-mod emagnetos onic waves, which propa gate a t $\s im$ 1–4 Mm s$ ^{- 1 }$under typ ical  coronal c ond iti ons.The Alfvé nico rfas t -mode  wav e s can bee xc ite d by  a broadban d d riv er, s uch as the  imp ulsive flare ener g y release, and  pro p a gat e o u twar dfrom the siteofen e r gy relea se . For fast- mode wav es to ac hievefocuse d, fiel d - al i gned e nerg y t ransport,  an  o v erdense  m ag n etic t ubewo uld be  requi r ed t o act as a wavegui de, w h i ch, i n  ou r cas e,  can be the

4. _The bursts_consist of multiple emission_lanes that_exhibit_a low–high–low_frequency_drift pattern in_the radio dynamic_spectrum with a moderate_relative frequency drift_rate_of $\dot{\nu}/\nu \lesssim 0.2 \rm{s}^{-1}$, which is typical for intermediate drift bursts in the_decimetric_wavelength range.

5.__Imaging_at all time and frequency_pixels where the bursts are_present shows_that the radio source propagates at a speed_of_1–2 Mm s$^{-1}$_in projection. The low–high–low frequency drift pattern corresponds to_the source firstly moving downward along_the flaring loop_before_it_reaching the lowest point_and bouncing back upward.

6.  Some_of the emission lanes consist of_multitudes of subsecond-period oscillations in emission frequency_with an amplitude of 1[$\delta\nu/\nu\approx$1–2$\%$]{}.

What is_the nature of the propagating_radio source_that is reflected at or_near the flare_ribbon? First,_it is most_likely associated with fundamental plasma radiation,_which is due_to the nonlinear conversion from plasma_Langmuir_waves induced by_the_presence_of nonthermal_electrons. This is_because_that the_bursts_have a narrow frequency bandwidth ($\delta_\nu/\nu_\approx 6\%$) and fast temporally varying features,_and are nearly 100%_polarized._Second, the propagation speed_of the emission source (1–2_Mm s$^{-1}$ in projection) is too_slow for_electron beams_emitting type III bursts (which usually propagate at 0.1$c$–0.5$c$, see, e.g.,_@2013ApJ...763L..21C [@2018ApJ...866...62C; @2017ApJ...851..151M]), but 1[likely]{} too_fast for slow-mode magnetosonic_waves, 1[unless_the_temperature in the_source_reaches over_$\sim$50 MK]{}. The most probable candidate for_the radio-emission-carrying_disturbance is thus Alfvénic or fast-mode_magnetosonic waves, which propagate_at_$\sim$1–4 Mm s$^{-1}$ under typical coronal_conditions. The Alfvénic or fast-mode waves_can be excited by a_broadband_driver,_such as the impulsive flare_energy release, and propagate outward from_the site of_energy release. For fast-mode waves to achieve_focused,_field-aligned energy transport, an overdense magnetic_tube_would be required to act as_a_waveguide,_which, in our case, can_be the