_\xi$ can be derived at this order.

The correction to the GB propagator is $$\begin{aligned}
\Pi^{\chi} &= - \delta_{2\chi} \gamma_{\chi\chi} k^2 -\delta_{\lambda_{2\chi}} 2\lambda_{2\chi}
+  \frac1{8\pi^2{\epsilon}} \bigg[
- 4 y_\chi^2 m_\psi^2 - 8 y_{2\chi} m_\psi^3  -2y_\chi^2 k^2
\nn \\
&\hspace{0.45cm} 
+6 g_{2A 2\chi} m_A^2 +3 k^2 \gamma^{hh}{\left(}\frac{g_{A \partial h \chi}+
g_{A\partial \chi h}}{2} {\right)}^2
\nn \\
&\hspace{0.45cm} 
+12 \gamma^{\chi\chi}\lambda_{4\chi} m_\chi^2  +2 \gamma^{hh}
 \lambda_{2h2\chi} m_h^2 + 4 \gamma^{hh}\gamma^{\chi\chi}
 \lambda_{h2\chi}^2 
  \bigg].
\label{Pi_chi}\end{aligned}$$ We find $\delta_{\lambda_{2h}} =\delta_{\lambda_{2\chi}}$ in all three regimes, as required by gauge invariance. Further we have \_[2]{} = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fac g^2 -y^2$$. \[Zphi\]

It is interesting to note that in the large field regime the counterterm $\delta_{\lambda 2\chi} = \O(\delta^3)$ whereas the individual fermion and gauge loop diagrams in [(\[Pi\_chi\])]{} are $\O(\delta^2)$. Renormalizability thus requires the two fermion diagrams to cancel at leading order, to end up with an $\O(\delta^3)$ loop correction. This is indeed what happens. This intricate cancellation is even more pronounced when we consider corrections to higher $n$-point GB scattering. For example, the structure of the fermion contribution to the four-point GB vertex is $$\begin{aligned}
V^{(4\chi)} &= -\delta_{\lambda 4\chi} 4! \lambda_{4\chi}
\nn
_ \xi$ can be derived at this order. 

 The correction to the GB propagator is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \Pi^{\chi } & = - \delta_{2\chi } \gamma_{\chi\chi } k^2 -\delta_{\lambda_{2\chi } } 2\lambda_{2\chi } 
 +   \frac1{8\pi^2{\epsilon } } \bigg [ 
 - 4 y_\chi^2 m_\psi^2 - 8 y_{2\chi } m_\psi^3   -2y_\chi^2 k^2 
 \nn \\ 
 & \hspace{0.45 cm } 
 +6 g_{2A 2\chi } m_A^2 +3 k^2 \gamma^{hh}{\left(}\frac{g_{A \partial h \chi}+ 
 g_{A\partial \chi h}}{2 } { \right)}^2 
 \nn \\ 
 & \hspace{0.45 cm } 
 +12 \gamma^{\chi\chi}\lambda_{4\chi } m_\chi^2   +2 \gamma^{hh } 
  \lambda_{2h2\chi } m_h^2 + 4 \gamma^{hh}\gamma^{\chi\chi } 
  \lambda_{h2\chi}^2 
   \bigg ]. 
 \label{Pi_chi}\end{aligned}$$ We witness $ \delta_{\lambda_{2h } } = \delta_{\lambda_{2\chi}}$ in all three government, as required by gauge invariance. far we have \_[2 ] { } = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fac g^2 -y^2$$. \[Zphi\ ] 

 It is interesting to note that in the big playing field regime the counterterm $ \delta_{\lambda 2\chi } = \O(\delta^3)$ whereas the individual fermion and bore loop topology diagrams in [ (\[Pi\_chi\ ]) ] { } are $ \O(\delta^2)$. Renormalizability therefore requires the two fermion diagrams to cancel at leading club, to end up with an $ \O(\delta^3)$ loop discipline. This is indeed what happens. This intricate cancellation is even more marked when we regard corrections to higher $ n$-point GB scattering. For exemplar, the structure of the fermion contribution to the four - point GB vertex is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 V^{(4\chi) } & = -\delta_{\lambda 4\chi } 4! \lambda_{4\chi } 
 \nn
_\xi$ fan be derived at this ovder.

The correction to tie GB pdopagatof is $$\begin{aligned}
\Pi^{\chi} &= - \delva_{2\chu} \gamna_{\chi\chi} k^2 -\delta_{\lambda_{2\zhi}} 2\lambdw_{2\chi}
+  \frqc1{8\pi^2{\tpsilon}} \bigg[
- 4 y_\chm^2 m_\psi^2 - 8 y_{2\chi} j_\isi^3  -2v_\cii^2 k^2
\nn \\
&\hspace{0.45cm} 
+6 g_{2A 2\chi} m_D^2 +3 k^2 \gamma^{hh}{\lext(}\wrcc{g_{A \partial h \chi}+
g_{A\partial \chi h}}{2} {\ridht)}^2
\nn \\
&\hxpwce{0.45cm} 
+12 \gamma^{\chy\chi}\kwmbdz_{4\bhl} m_\chi^2  +2 \gamma^{hh}
 \lambda_{2h2\chi} m_h^2 + 4 \gamma^{hi}\gamma^{\chi\chi}
 \lakbda_{h2\chi}^2 
  \bigg].
\label{Pi_chi}\ejd{allgned}$$ We find $\deltw_{\lambda_{2h}} =\deota_{\lwnbda_{2\chi}}$ in aul three rtgnmes, as reqoired by gauge invariance. Furthef we kave \_[2]{} = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fac g^2 -y^2$$. \[Xkhi\]

It is intxrestigg to note tmst in dhe larbe field regimc the coynterterm $\delta_{\lambda 2\chi} = \O(\delta^3)$ wherews the ingiridual fermion and gaygw look diacramr in [(\[Pi\_dhm\])]{} ade $\O(\depta^2)$. Renormaliaability thys requires the two fqgkion diagrama to cwnsel at leading order, to end up with an $\M(\demta^3)$ loop correction. Thiw is indeed what happgns. This igtricate cancellation is even more pronounced whet we rovsibcv cofeeftions to higher $n$-point GB scattering. For exaillt, tme structure of bhe fermion contrinuhipg to the four-koint GY vsrtex is $$\begin{aligjed}
V^{(4\chi)} &= -\delra_{\lambda 4\shi} 4! \lambda_{4\chi}
\nn
_\xi$ can be derived at this order. to GB propagator $$\begin{aligned} \Pi^{\chi} &= 2\lambda_{2\chi} \frac1{8\pi^2{\epsilon}} \bigg[ - y_\chi^2 m_\psi^2 - y_{2\chi} m_\psi^3 -2y_\chi^2 k^2 \nn \\ +6 g_{2A 2\chi} m_A^2 +3 k^2 \gamma^{hh}{\left(}\frac{g_{A \partial h \chi}+ g_{A\partial \chi h}}{2} \nn \\ &\hspace{0.45cm} +12 \gamma^{\chi\chi}\lambda_{4\chi} m_\chi^2 +2 \gamma^{hh} \lambda_{2h2\chi} m_h^2 + 4 \gamma^{hh}\gamma^{\chi\chi} \bigg]. We $\delta_{\lambda_{2h}} in all three regimes, as required by gauge invariance. Further we have \_[2]{} = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fac -y^2$$. \[Zphi\] It is interesting to note that the large field regime counterterm $\delta_{\lambda 2\chi} = \O(\delta^3)$ the fermion and loop in are $\O(\delta^2)$. Renormalizability requires the two fermion diagrams to cancel at leading order, to end up with an $\O(\delta^3)$ loop This is happens. This cancellation even pronounced when we to higher $n$-point GB scattering. For of the fermion contribution to the four-point GB is $$\begin{aligned} &= -\delta_{\lambda 4\chi} 4! \lambda_{4\chi} \nn
_\xi$ can be derived at this order.

the correctIon to The gB pRoPagaTor iS $$\begin{aligned}
\PI^{\Chi} &= - \dElta_{2\chi} \gamma_{\chi\chi} k^2 -\delTa_{\lamBdA_{2\Chi}} 2\lAMbDa_{2\chi}
+  \Frac1{8\pi^2{\ePSiLON}} \biGg[
- 4 Y_\cHi^2 m_\PsI^2 - 8 Y_{2\cHi} m_\psI^3  -2y_\cHi^2 k^2
\nn \\
&\hsPace{0.45cm} 
+6 g_{2A 2\chI} m_A^2 +3 K^2 \gAmma^{hh}{\left(}\frAC{g_{a \partial h \cHi}+
g_{a\partial \chi h}}{2} {\RigHt)}^2
\nn \\
&\hsPaCe{0.45cM} 
+12 \Gamma^{\Chi\Chi}\laMbda_{4\chI} M_\chi^2  +2 \gaMma^{hh}
 \lambDa_{2H2\Chi} m_h^2 + 4 \gAMma^{hh}\gaMMA^{\cHi\chI}
 \lambda_{h2\chi}^2 
  \bigg].
\laBEl{pI_chi}\end{aligned}$$ we find $\DeLTa_{\LAMbdA_{2h}} =\dElta_{\lambda_{2\ChI}}$ in alL Three reGImES, AS reQUired by gauge iNvariance. FuRTheR we havE \_[2]{} = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fAc g^2 -Y^2$$. \[zphi\]

It Is intErEStiNg to note thaT in tHe large fiEld regIMe the coUNterterM $\delta_{\LamBda 2\Chi} = \O(\DElTa^3)$ WheReAS thE InDivIDuaL fermion AnD gAuge lOop dIAGRAms iN [(\[Pi\_Chi\])]{} aRe $\O(\deLta^2)$. RenormalizAbiLity THus RequiRes thE two FeRmion DiagraMs to cAnCel at leading ordEr, to End up with An $\O(\DeLta^3)$ LoOp corREction. thiS is Indeed wHat happENs. THiS INTrIcate cancellation iS eVEN mOre pronoUnced wHEn We COnsider cOrRecTionS TO highEr $n$-pOInT GB scattEring. FOR eXaMple, the StRucturE oF thE feRmion COntrIbutioN to the foUr-poiNT GB vertex is $$\begIN{aligned}
V^{(4\chi)} &= -\dELtA_{\LAmBDa 4\chI} 4! \laMbda_{4\chi}
\nn
_\xi$ can be derived at th is order.
Thecor rec ti on t o th e GB propagato r  is$$\begin{aligned}
\Pi^ {\chi }& = -\ de lta_{ 2\chi}\ ga m m a_{ \c hi \ch i} k^ 2 -\d elt a_{\lam bda_{2\chi }}2\ lambda_{2\ch i }+  \frac1{ 8\p i^2{\epsilon }}\bigg[ 
-  4y _\chi ^2m_\ps i^2 -8  y_{2\ chi} m_\p si ^ 3  -2y _ \chi^2k ^ 2\nn\\
&\hspace{0.45c m }+6 g_{2A 2\chi } m_A^ 2+ 3k ^ 2 \ gam ma^{hh}{\l ef t(}\f r ac{g_{A \p a r t ial h \chi}+
g_{A \partial \c h i h }}{2}{\ rig h t)}^2\nn \ \& \hs pace{0.45cm } 
+ 12 \gamma ^{\chi \ chi}\la m bda_{4\ chi} m _\c hi^ 2  + 2  \ ga mma ^{ h h}\l amb d a_{ 2h2\chi}  m _h ^2 +4 \g a m m a ^{hh }\g amma ^{\ch i\chi}
 \lamb da_ {h2\ c hi} ^2 
 \big g].\l abel{ Pi_chi }\end {a ligned}$$ We fi nd $ \delta_{\ lam bd a_{ 2h }} =\ d elta_{ \la mbd a_{2\ch i}}$ in all  t h r e eregimes, as requir ed b ygauge in varian c e.  F u rther we  h ave  \_[ 2 ] {} =\_=1 [8 \^2]{}$$ 3\facg ^2  - y^2$$.\[ Zphi\] 
Itisinter e stin g to n ote that  in t h e large fieldr egime the cou n te r t er m  $\d elt a_{\lambda2\ch i } =\O(\ d el ta^ 3 )$ wh ereas  t h ei ndividual fermion a nd  gauge  loop  diagrams in[(\[Pi\_ch i \ ] )]{} are  $\O ( \d e lta^2)$. Renor maliz ability th u s requir es th e two fe rmion dia g r ams to c anc elatlea d i ng  order, to en d up w it h an $\ O(\ delta^3 )$loo p c orr ec tion. Thi s is ind ee dwh at  ha ppens .  This in tr ica te  ca ncell a tion i s eve n mo re  p r ono unced w h en w e co ns id er c orr ec tions  toh igh er $n$- point GBsca t teri ng .For exa mple, the str uc ture of th efer mion c o n tributio n to the four-point GBv ertex i s $ $\beg in{a ligned}
V ^{( 4\chi) } & =  -\del ta_{\l ambda  4 \ch i }  4! \ l a mb da_ {4 \chi}
\nn
_\xi$ can_be derived_at this order.

The correction_to the_GB_propagator is_$$\begin{aligned}
\Pi^{\chi}_&= - \delta_{2\chi}_\gamma_{\chi\chi} k^2 -\delta_{\lambda_{2\chi}}_2\lambda_{2\chi}
+  \frac1{8\pi^2{\epsilon}} \bigg[
-_4 y_\chi^2 m_\psi^2_-_8 y_{2\chi} m_\psi^3  -2y_\chi^2 k^2
\nn \\
&\hspace{0.45cm} 
+6 g_{2A 2\chi} m_A^2 +3 k^2 \gamma^{hh}{\left(}\frac{g_{A_\partial_h \chi}+
g_{A\partial_\chi_h}}{2}_{\right)}^2
\nn \\
&\hspace{0.45cm} 
+12 \gamma^{\chi\chi}\lambda_{4\chi} m_\chi^2_ +2 \gamma^{hh}
 \lambda_{2h2\chi} m_h^2_+ 4_\gamma^{hh}\gamma^{\chi\chi}
 \lambda_{h2\chi}^2 
  \bigg].
\label{Pi_chi}\end{aligned}$$ We find $\delta_{\lambda_{2h}}_=\delta_{\lambda_{2\chi}}$_in all three_regimes, as required by gauge invariance. Further we have_\_[2]{} = \_= 1[8\^2]{}$$3\fac g^2 -y^2$$._\[Zphi\]

It is interesting_to_note_that in the large_field regime the counterterm $\delta_{\lambda 2\chi}_= \O(\delta^3)$ whereas the individual fermion_and gauge loop diagrams in [(\[Pi\_chi\])]{} are_$\O(\delta^2)$. Renormalizability thus requires the two_fermion diagrams to cancel at_leading order,_to end up with an_$\O(\delta^3)$ loop correction._This is_indeed what happens._This intricate cancellation is even more_pronounced when we_consider corrections to higher $n$-point GB_scattering._For example, the_structure_of_the fermion_contribution to the_four-point_GB vertex_is_$$\begin{aligned}
V^{(4\chi)} &= -\delta_{\lambda 4\chi} 4! \lambda_{4\chi}
\nn