cf.Eqs. (\[Dk\]) and (\[tau\])). In contrast, in the stationary phase, further accumulation of the mutational load is determined solely by $\delta_0/N_0$ the rate at which tissue-specific stem cells differentiate at the bottommost level of the hierarchy. Such biphasic behavior has been observed in the accumulation of mutations both in somatic [@Rozhok:2015] and germ line cells [@Kong:2012; @Gao:2016; @Rahbari:2016]. In both cases a substantial number of mutations were found to occur relatively rapidly during development followed by a slower linear accumulation of mutation thereafter. General theoretical arguments imply that the contribution of the mutational load incurred during development to cancer risk is substantial [@Frank:2003], but this has been suggested to be in conflict with the fact that the majority of cancers develop late in life [@Rozhok:2015; @Rozhok:2016]. Resolving this question and more generally understanding the development of cancer in self-renewing tissues will require modeling the evolutionary dynamics of how the hierarchical organization of healthy tissues breaks down.

Spontaneously occurring mutations accumulate in somatic cells throughout a person’s lifetime, but the majority of these mutations do not have a noticeable effect. A small minority, however, can alter key cellular functions and a fraction of these confer a selective advantage to the cell, leading to preferential growth or survival of a clone [@Martincorena:2015rev]. Hierarchical tissue organization can limit somatic evolution at both these levels: (i) at the level of mutations, as we demonstrated above, it can dramatically reduce the number of cell divisions required and correspondingly the mutational load incurred during tissue homeostasis; and (ii) at the level of selection acting on mutations with non-neutral phenotypic effects, as demonstrated by Nowak et al. [@Nowak:2003] and later by Pepper et al. [@Pepper:2007], tissues organized into serial differentiation experience lower rates of such detrimental cell-level phenotypic evolution. Extending the seminal results of Nowak et al. and Pepper et al., we propose that in addition to limiting somatic evolution at the phenotypic level, hierarchies are also how the tissues of multicellular organisms keep the accumulation of mutations in check, and that tissue-specific stem cells may in general correspond to a diverse set of slower dividing cell types.

In summary, we have considered a generic model of hierarchically organized self-renewing tissue, in
cf. Eqs.   (\[Dk\ ]) and (\[tau\ ]) ). In contrast, in the stationary phase, further accumulation of the mutational load is determine entirely by $ \delta_0 / N_0 $ the rate at which tissue - specific stem cell distinguish at the bottommost level of the hierarchy. Such biphasic behavior has been respect in the accumulation of mutations both in bodily [ @Rozhok:2015 ] and source line cell [ @Kong:2012; @Gao:2016; @Rahbari:2016 ]. In both cases a substantial phone number of mutation were found to occur relatively rapidly during development followed by a slow linear accumulation of mutation thereafter. cosmopolitan theoretical arguments imply that the contribution of the mutational cargo incurred during growth to cancer risk is substantial [ @Frank:2003 ], but this has been suggested to be in conflict with the fact that the majority of cancers modernize late in life [ @Rozhok:2015; @Rozhok:2016 ]. Resolving this question and more generally understanding the development of cancer in self - renewing tissues will require modeling the evolutionary dynamics of how the hierarchical organization of healthy tissues breaks down. 

 Spontaneously happen mutations accumulate in bodily cell throughout a person ’s life, but the majority of these mutations do not have a noticeable effect. A small minority, however, can alter key cellular functions and a fraction of these confer a selective advantage to the cellular telephone, leading to preferential growth or survival of a clone [ @Martincorena:2015rev ]. Hierarchical tissue organization can limit somatic evolution at both these levels: (i) at the level of mutations, as we attest above, it can dramatically reduce the act of cell divisions required and correspondingly the mutational load incurred during tissue homeostasis; and (ii) at the floor of selection acting on mutations with non - neutral phenotypic effects, as demonstrated by Nowak et al.   [ @Nowak:2003 ] and later by Pepper et al. [ @Pepper:2007 ], tissue organized into consecutive differentiation experience lower rates of such detrimental cell - degree phenotypic development. Extending the seminal result of Nowak et al.   and Pepper et al. , we propose that in addition to specify bodily evolution at the phenotypic level, hierarchy are also how the tissues of multicellular organisms keep the accumulation of mutant in check, and that tissue - specific stem cell may in general correspond to a diverse set of slower dividing cell type. 

 In summary, we have considered a generic model of hierarchically organized self - renewing tissue, in
cf.Ees. (\[Dk\]) and (\[tau\])). In contrast, in the stationcey phave, furfher accjmulation of the mutational poqd is determined solely by $\aelta_0/N_0$ thv rate at whirh tissue-specifir stem ccjls slfferznviate at the bojtommost leval of the hierdrzhv. Such biphasic behavior has been obferved on the accumulatyon ps mufations both in somatic [@Rozhok:2015] and germ lpne cells [@Kong:2012; @Gap:2016; @Rahbari:2016]. In both cases a dubshantial number of lutations wgde siund to occuf relatively rapidly doring development followed by a rlowex linear acxunulwjion of mutavion trereafter. Gekvral thaoreticsl arguments ikplb thqt the contribution oh the mutational loaq incurreg buring development to cqncer risn is wubrtahtmal [@Frank:2003], buv this has geen suggesred to be in conflivt qith the fact that ehq majority of cancers develop late in lpfe [@Dozhok:2015; @Rozhok:2016]. Resolving this question and mote generaljy understanding the development of cancer in selx-renexivg uiwsues qipl require modeling the evolutionary dynamics kf hpw the hierarcmical organization ov ngalthy tissues breaks dkwn.

Spontaneously ofcurrind mutqtions acsumukate in somatic cells throuthout a persjb’s lifetime, but thz majority oy thesg mutayions do not have a notnceabls effect. A dmall minkfity, however, can alner ney cellular functions and a fractiin oy these zonfgr a sejective adgantana to the cell, leadlng tl [referentiwl growth or survival of a clonx [@Martincorens:2015rav]. Vierarchncal tlssue organizatyon can limit xomatic evoljtion at bkth theve levels: (i) at the level lf mutations, as we dqmonwtrared aboxd, it can dramayically rvdbce the nymber of cell divixiova required and euteespondingly tne outwtponel lowg incurred dgrine tkxsue fomeostasis; xnd (oi) at the level of salecfion acting on mutstlons with non-neutwal phenotypiv effects, as demondtratxd by Iowak rt wl. [@Nowak:2003] and later by Pepper et al. [@Peppeg:2007], tlssues organised lnto serial diyferentiation experience lower rates of wuch detrimental cwll-level phenotypic tvolution. Extxnding the semital results of Nowak et al. and Pepper tt al., we propose that ih addidion ho limiting somatic evolution at the phenotypic level, hierarchies are alsi how vhq tissues or mukticenlblax organysms yeep the accumulstion of mutations in check, and that tivsbe-specific stem cells may in beveral correspund to a diverse set of alower doviding cell types.

In summary, we have considered a generlc model if hisrarchpdauly organized self-tenewiug tiswue, in
cf.Eqs. (\[Dk\]) and (\[tau\])). In contrast, in phase, accumulation of mutational load is rate which tissue-specific stem differentiate at the level of the hierarchy. Such biphasic has been observed in the accumulation of mutations both in somatic [@Rozhok:2015] and line cells [@Kong:2012; @Gao:2016; @Rahbari:2016]. In both cases a substantial number of mutations found occur rapidly development followed by a slower linear accumulation of mutation thereafter. General theoretical arguments imply that the of the mutational load incurred during development to risk is substantial [@Frank:2003], this has been suggested to in with the that majority cancers develop late life [@Rozhok:2015; @Rozhok:2016]. Resolving this question and more generally understanding the development of cancer in self-renewing tissues require modeling dynamics of the organization healthy tissues breaks occurring mutations accumulate in somatic cells lifetime, but the majority of these mutations do have a effect. A small minority, however, can key cellular functions and a fraction of these a selective advantage to the cell, leading to preferential growth or survival of a clone tissue organization can limit evolution at both levels: at level mutations, as demonstrated above, it can dramatically reduce the number of cell divisions and correspondingly the mutational load incurred during tissue homeostasis; and the of selection acting mutations with non-neutral phenotypic as by Nowak et al. later Pepper tissues into differentiation experience lower rates such detrimental cell-level phenotypic evolution. the seminal results of et al., we propose that in addition to somatic evolution at the phenotypic level, hierarchies also how the tissues of multicellular organisms keep the accumulation of mutations check, and stem cells may in general correspond to a set of slower dividing types. In summary, we have considered a generic model hierarchically self-renewing tissue,
cf.Eqs. (\[Dk\]) and (\[tau\])). In contrast, in The stationAry phAse, FurThEr acCumuLation of the mutATionAl load is determined soleLy by $\dElTA_0/N_0$ thE RaTe at wHich tisSUe-SPEciFiC sTem CeLLs DiffeRenTiate at The bottommOst LeVel of the hierARcHy. Such biphAsiC behavior has BeeN obserVeD in THe accUmuLatioN of mutATions bOth in somaTiC [@rozhok:2015] ANd germ lINE cElls [@kong:2012; @Gao:2016; @Rahbari:2016]. In bOTh CAses a substantiAl numbEr OF mUTAtiOns Were found tO oCcur rELativelY RaPIDLy dURing developmeNt followed bY A slOwer liNeAr aCCumulaTion oF mUTatIon thereaftEr. GeNeral theoReticaL ArgumenTS imply tHat the ConTriButiON oF tHe mUtATioNAl LoaD IncUrred durInG dEveloPmenT TO CAnceR riSk is SubstAntial [@Frank:2003], buT thIs haS BeeN suggEsted To be In ConflIct witH the fAcT that the majoritY of cAncers devEloP lAte In Life [@ROZhok:2015; @RoZhoK:2016]. ReSolving This queSTioN aND MOrE generally understaNdING tHe develoPment oF CaNcER in self-rEnEwiNg tiSSUes wiLl reQUiRe modeliNg the eVOlUtIonary dYnAmics oF hOw tHe hIerarCHicaL organIzation oF healTHy tissues breakS Down.

SpontaneoUSlY OCcURrinG muTations accuMulaTE in sOmatIC cEllS ThrouGhout A pERsON’s lifetime, but the majOrIty of tHese mUtations do not Have a noticEABLe effect. a smaLL mINority, however, cAn altEr key celluLAr functiOns anD a fractiOn of these CONfer a selEctIve AdvAntAGE tO the cell, leadiNG To prEfErentiaL grOwth or sUrvIvaL of A clOnE [@MartincoRena:2015rev]. HIeRaRcHiCal TissuE OrganizaTiOn cAn LimIt somATic evoLutioN at bOtH tHEse Levels: (i) AT tHE LeveL oF mUtatIonS, aS we deMonsTRatEd above, It can dramAtiCAlly ReDuCe the nuMber of cell divIsIons requirEd And CorresPONdingly tHe mutational load incurreD During tIssUe homEostAsis; and (ii) At tHe leveL of SElectiOn actiNg on mUtAtiONS with NON-nEutRaL phenotypiC EFfeCts, as DeMonsTrated bY Nowak et al. [@Nowak:2003] and LAteR by Pepper et al. [@pepPer:2007], tISSuEs oRGaNIzeD iNTo sERIal differentiatIon experieNcE LoWer rates of SUch DeTrimentAl cell-lEvel pHEnotypiC evolutioN. ExtendinG tHe seMINal Results of NOwak et al. And Pepper ET al., we PRoPose tHat In addiTiOn tO limiTing soMAtiC evolUtion aT tHe phenOtypiC lEvel, hierArchies are also how the tisSues of MultiCelLular orgaNisMS keEp the accuMulaTion of mutaTioNs iN checK, anD That tIssuE-SpEciFIc steM celLS may in genERaL coRREsPond to a diveRSE Set Of sloWer DIvidinG celL types.

In summary, we HAve considered a GeneRIC moDel OF hieRaRchically organIzeD sELF-renewinG tIssue, in
cf.Eqs. (\[Dk\]) and (\[ta u\])). Incontr ast , i nthestat ionary phase,f urth er accumulation of the  muta ti o nall oa d isdetermi n ed s ole ly  b y $ \d e lt a_0/N _0$  the ra te at whic h t is sue-specific st em cells d iff erentiate at  th e bott om mos t  leve l o f the  hiera r chy. S uch bipha si c  behav i or hasb e en  obs erved in the accu m ul a tion of mutati ons bo th in s oma tic  [@Rozhok: 20 15] a n d germl in e c ell s  [@Kong:2012;  @Gao:2016; @Ra hbari: 20 16] .  In bo th ca se s  asubstantial  num ber of mu tation s  were f o und tooccurrel ati vely ra pi dly  d u rin g  d eve l opm ent foll ow ed  by a  slo w e r line araccu mulat ion of mutati onther e aft er. G enera l th eo retic al arg ument simply that thecont ributionofth e m ut ation a l load  in cur red dur ing dev e lop me n t to  cancer risk is su bs t a nt ial [@Fr ank:20 0 3] ,b ut thisha s b eens u ggest ed t o  b e in con flictw it hthe fac tthat t he  ma jor ity o f  can cers d evelop l ate i n  life [@Rozhok : 2015; @Rozhok : 20 1 6 ]. Reso lvi ng this que stio n  and  mor e  g ene r allyunder st a nd i ng the developmentof  cance r inself-renewing  tissues w i l l  require  mod e li n g the evolutio narydynamics o f  how the  hier archical  organiza t i on of he alt hytis sue s br eaks down.

S p o ntan eo usly oc cur ring mu tat ion s a ccu mu late in s omatic c el ls  t hr oug houta  person’ slif et ime , but the ma jorit y of  t he s e m utation s  d o notha ve  a n oti ce ableeffe c t.A small  minority , h o weve r,  c an alte r key cellula rfunctionsan d a  fract i o n of the se confer a selective a d vantage  to  thecell , leading  to  prefe ren t ial gr owth o r sur vi val o f a c l o ne  [@ Ma rtincorena : 2 015 rev].  H iera rchical  tissue organizati o n c an limit soma tic  evo l u ti ona tb oth  t h ese l evels: (i) at t he level o fm ut ations, as wede monstra ted abo ve, i t  can dr amaticall y reduceth e nu m b erof cell di visionsrequireda nd co r re spond ing ly the  m uta tiona l load inc urred  durin gtissue  home os tasis; a nd (ii) at the level of  selec tionact ing on mu tat i ons  with non -neu tral pheno typ iceffec ts, as de mons t ra ted by No wake t al. [@N o wa k:2 0 0 3]  and laterb y Pep per e t a l . [@Pe pper :2007], tissues o r ganized into s eria l dif fer e ntia ti on experiencelow er r ates ofsu ch detrimen tal cell -l e vel p henoty pic ev olution . Ex t ending  the  se minal res ult so f Nowak  e ta l. and  Pep pe r et a l., we prop o s e that in additi on to l imiti n g s omati cevoluti o n at  the pheno typic level , hier arch ies a re also  h ow the  ti ss ues of mul t icellular  orga nisms k ee p th e a ccumul atio n of mu tati on s i n check,a n dt ha tt iss ue-s pecif ic  ste m cells m a y in gen era l  corres po ndt o  a div e rs e set of slo wer  divi d i ng cell ty p es.In summa ry, we  haveconside r edageneric  mo d e l of hier archicall y  or ga nize d self-r en ewin gtis su e, in
cf.Eqs. (\[Dk\]) and_(\[tau\])). In_contrast, in the stationary_phase, further_accumulation_of the_mutational_load is determined_solely by $\delta_0/N_0$_the rate at which_tissue-specific stem cells_differentiate_at the bottommost level of the hierarchy. Such biphasic behavior has been observed in_the_accumulation of_mutations_both_in somatic [@Rozhok:2015] and germ_line cells [@Kong:2012; @Gao:2016; @Rahbari:2016]._In both_cases a substantial number of mutations were found_to_occur relatively rapidly_during development followed by a slower linear accumulation of_mutation thereafter. General theoretical arguments imply_that the contribution_of_the_mutational load incurred during_development to cancer risk is substantial_[@Frank:2003], but this has been suggested_to be in conflict with the fact_that the majority of cancers develop_late in life [@Rozhok:2015; @Rozhok:2016]._Resolving this_question and more generally understanding_the development of_cancer in_self-renewing tissues will_require modeling the evolutionary dynamics of_how the hierarchical_organization of healthy tissues breaks down.

Spontaneously_occurring_mutations accumulate in_somatic_cells_throughout a_person’s lifetime, but_the_majority of_these_mutations do not have a noticeable_effect._A small minority, however, can alter key_cellular functions and a_fraction_of these confer a_selective advantage to the cell,_leading to preferential growth or survival_of a_clone [@Martincorena:2015rev]._Hierarchical tissue organization can limit somatic evolution at both these levels:_(i) at the level of mutations,_as we demonstrated above,_it can_dramatically_reduce the number_of_cell divisions_required and correspondingly the mutational load incurred_during tissue_homeostasis; and (ii) at the level_of selection acting on_mutations_with non-neutral phenotypic effects, as demonstrated_by Nowak et al. [@Nowak:2003] and later_by Pepper et al. [@Pepper:2007],_tissues_organized_into serial differentiation experience lower_rates of such detrimental cell-level phenotypic_evolution. Extending the_seminal results of Nowak et al. and Pepper_et_al., we propose that in addition_to_limiting somatic evolution at the phenotypic_level,_hierarchies_are also how the tissues_of multicellular organisms keep the accumulation_of mutations in check, and that tissue-specific stem cells_may in general_correspond to a diverse set_of_slower_dividing cell types.

In summary, we have considered a generic model_of hierarchically_organized self-renewing tissue,_in