 of $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is very useful to make connections with models already discussed in the literature. For instance, it is simple to verify from (\[hq1b\]) that the parametrization (\[novoq\]), in the special case $q_{i}=1/2$, is related to the Modified Polytropic Cardassian (MPC) model [@gondolo]. This model depends on three parameters: $m$ (denoted by $q$ in [@gondolo]), $n$ and $\Omega _{m0}$. If we identify, $%
\Omega _{m0}=\Omega _{m\infty }$, $m=1/(\tau (1-2q_{f}))$ and $n=2/3(1+q_{f})
$, it follows that the two models have the same kinematics. Note that, since $%
q_{f}<0$, the condition $n<2/3$ follows naturally. We remark that in the MPC model, $%
\Omega _{m0}$ is the present value of the matter density parameter, while $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is defined at high redshift. These two quantities do not necessarily have the same value in the general case if, for instance, dark matter and dark energy are coupled [@coup]. As an example, consider models with a variable coupling between dark matter and dark energy (assumed to have constant equation of state $w_x$), and such that $\rho_X/\rho_m=\rho_{X0}/\rho_{m0} a^{\xi}$ [@dalal]. These models can be described by Eqn. (\[hq1b\]) if we identify $\Omega_{m0}=\Omega _{m\infty }^{1/\tau(1-2q_f)}$, $\xi=1/\tau$ and $w_X=-(1-2q_f)/3$. As remarked before, in our formulation it is not necessary to make strong assumptions about the dark sector or gravity theory. In MPC model the universe components are specified to be matter and radiation; there is no dark energy. The parametrization (\[novoq\]) includes the MPC model (and the coupling models above) as special cases.

Neglecting baryons, the quartessence Chaplygin model $(p=-M^{4(\alpha +1)}/\rho ^{\alpha
})$ [@quartessence], is obtained if we assume $q_{i}=1/
of $ \Omega _ { m\infty } $ is very useful to make connections with models already discourse in the literature. For case, it is simple to verify from (\[hq1b\ ]) that the parametrization (\[novoq\ ]), in the special lawsuit $ q_{i}=1/2 $, is related to the Modified Polytropic Cardassian   (MPC) model [ @gondolo ]. This mannequin count on three parameters: $ m$ (denote by $ q$ in [ @gondolo ]), $ n$ and $ \Omega _ { m0}$. If we identify, $% 
 \Omega _ { m0}=\Omega _ { m\infty } $, $ m=1/(\tau (1 - 2q_{f}))$ and $ n=2/3(1+q_{f }) 
 $, it follows that the two model have the same kinematics. Note that, since $% 
 q_{f}<0 $, the condition $ n<2/3 $ follows naturally. We remark that in the MPC exemplar, $% 
 \Omega _ { m0}$ is the present value of the matter density parameter, while $ \Omega _ { m\infty } $ is define at high redshift. These two quantities do not necessarily experience the same value in the general case if, for instance, dark topic and dark energy are coupled [ @coup ]. As an example, consider models with a varying yoke between colored matter and dark energy (assumed to have constant equation of state $ w_x$), and such that $ \rho_X/\rho_m=\rho_{X0}/\rho_{m0 } a^{\xi}$ [ @dalal ]. These model can be described by Eqn. (\[hq1b\ ]) if we identify $ \Omega_{m0}=\Omega _ { m\infty } ^{1/\tau(1 - 2q_f)}$, $ \xi=1/\tau$ and $ w_X=-(1 - 2q_f)/3$. As comment earlier, in our formulation it is not necessary to make strong assumption about the dark sector or gravity theory. In MPC model the universe component are specified to be matter and radiation; there is no dark energy. The parametrization (\[novoq\ ]) include the MPC model (and the coupling models above) as special sheath. 

 Neglecting baryons, the quartessence Chaplygin exemplar $ (p=-M^{4(\alpha +1)}/\rho ^{\alpha 
 }) $ [ @quartessence ], is obtained if we assume $ q_{i}=1/
 of $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is very ureful to make connectimns wifh modelr already discussed in the lmterqture. For instance, it is siople to vvrify fron (\[hq1u\]) that the paramxfrization (\[novke\]), in vhe special casg $q_{i}=1/2$, is reladed to the Modhfkeb Polytropic Cardassian (MPC) model [@gonqolo]. Thos model depends on uhrqe pzganeters: $m$ (denoted by $q$ in [@gondklo]), $n$ aid $\Omega _{m0}$. If wr identify, $%
\Omega _{m0}=\Omega _{m\ijfty }$, $m=1/(\tau (1-2q_{f}))$ and $n=2/3(1+q_{f})
$, lt follows jgat rhe two modeus have tht vame kinemztics. Note that, since $%
q_{f}<0$, the covditipn $n<2/3$ folloqs nahorally. We renark nhat in the MIB model, $%
\Omega _{k0}$ is the presekt vanue of the matter densitb parameter, while $\Omgga _{m\infty }$ ns defined at high reesyift. Jhese two wuavtiuiex so not neressarily hzve the samw value in the genetaj case if, for jnstanse, dark matter and dark energy are coupleg [@ckup]. As an example, consieer models with a varlable cou[ling between dark matter and dark energy (assumed to hevd cinfgqnh equation of state $w_x$), and such that $\rho_X/\rho_m=\wgo_{C0}/\rmo_{m0} a^{\xi}$ [@dalal]. Thcse models can be cedctybed by Eqn. (\[hd1b\]) if cs jdentify $\Omega_{m0}=\Omeha _{m\infjy }^{1/\tau(1-2w_f)}$, $\xi=1/\tau$ wnd $e_X=-(1-2q_f)/3$. As remarked before, in iur formulatpon ut is not necessarv to make stxong axsumpyions about the dark seetor od gravity tjeory. In JOC model the unixerxe components are specified eo be matver aud radiagion; there is no darn enevcy. The parametrizahion (\[uovoq\]) includes hhe MPC model (and the coupling models above) ax vpebial casef.

Neglccting baryons, ehe quartessenee Chaplvgin mudel $(p=-M^{4(\alpga +1)}/\rho ^{\elpha
})$ [@quartefsence], is obtdlned if we avsume $q_{i}=1/
of $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is very useful connections models already in the literature. to from (\[hq1b\]) that parametrization (\[novoq\]), in special case $q_{i}=1/2$, is related to Modified Polytropic Cardassian (MPC) model [@gondolo]. This model depends on three parameters: $m$ by $q$ in [@gondolo]), $n$ and $\Omega _{m0}$. If we identify, $% \Omega _{m\infty $m=1/(\tau and $, it follows that the two models have the same kinematics. Note that, since $% q_{f}<0$, condition $n<2/3$ follows naturally. We remark that in MPC model, $% \Omega is the present value of matter parameter, while _{m\infty is at high redshift. two quantities do not necessarily have the same value in the general case if, for instance, dark and dark coupled [@coup]. an consider with a variable dark matter and dark energy (assumed equation of state $w_x$), and such that $\rho_X/\rho_m=\rho_{X0}/\rho_{m0} [@dalal]. These can be described by Eqn. (\[hq1b\]) we identify $\Omega_{m0}=\Omega _{m\infty }^{1/\tau(1-2q_f)}$, $\xi=1/\tau$ and $w_X=-(1-2q_f)/3$. remarked before, in our formulation it is not necessary to make strong assumptions about the or gravity theory. In model the universe are to matter radiation; there no dark energy. The parametrization (\[novoq\]) includes the MPC model (and coupling models above) as special cases. Neglecting baryons, the quartessence $(p=-M^{4(\alpha ^{\alpha })$ [@quartessence], obtained if we assume
 of $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is very useful To make connEctioNs wIth MoDels AlreAdy discussed in THe liTerature. For instance, it iS simpLe TO verIFy From (\[hQ1b\]) that tHE pARAmeTrIzAtiOn (\[NOvOq\]), in tHe sPecial cAse $q_{i}=1/2$, is relAteD tO the Modified pOlYtropic CarDasSian (MPC) model [@GonDolo]. ThIs ModEL depeNds On thrEe paraMEters: $m$ (Denoted by $Q$ iN [@GondolO]), $N$ and $\OmeGA _{M0}$. IF we iDentify, $%
\Omega _{m0}=\OmegA _{M\iNFty }$, $m=1/(\tau (1-2q_{f}))$ and $n=2/3(1+q_{F})
$, it folLoWS tHAT thE twO models havE tHe samE KinematICs. nOTE thAT, since $%
q_{f}<0$, the coNdition $n<2/3$ folLOws NaturaLlY. We REmark tHat in ThE mPC Model, $%
\Omega _{m0}$ Is thE present vAlue of THe matteR Density ParameTer, WhiLe $\OmEGa _{M\iNftY }$ iS DefINeD at HIgh Redshift. thEsE two qUantITIES do nOt nEcesSarilY have the same vAluE in tHE geNeral Case iF, for InStancE, dark mAtter AnD dark energy are cOuplEd [@coup]. As aN exAmPle, CoNsideR Models WitH a vAriable CouplinG BetWeEN DArK matter and dark enerGy (ASSuMed to havE constANt EqUAtion of sTaTe $w_X$), and SUCh thaT $\rho_x/\RhO_m=\rho_{X0}/\rhO_{m0} a^{\xi}$ [@dALaL]. THese modElS can be DeScrIbeD by EqN. (\[Hq1b\]) iF we ideNtify $\OmeGa_{m0}=\OmEGa _{m\infty }^{1/\tau(1-2q_f)}$, $\xI=1/\Tau$ and $w_X=-(1-2q_f)/3$. As rEMaRKEd BEforE, in Our formulatIon iT Is noT necESsAry TO make StronG aSSuMPtions about the dark sEcTor or gRavitY theory. In MPC mOdel the uniVERSe componEnts ARe SPecified to be maTter aNd radiatioN; There is nO dark Energy. ThE parametrIZAtion (\[novOq\]) iNclUdeS thE mpC Model (and the coUPLing MoDels aboVe) aS speciaL caSes.

negLecTiNg baryons, The quartEsSeNcE CHapLygin MOdel $(p=-M^{4(\alPhA +1)}/\rhO ^{\aLphA
})$ [@quarTEssencE], is obTainEd If WE asSume $q_{i}=1/
 of $\Omega _{m\infty }$ i s very use ful t o m ake  c onne ctio ns with models alre ady discussed in the l itera tu r e. F o rinsta nce, it is s imp le  t o v er i fy  from  (\ [hq1b\] ) that the  pa ra metrization( \[ novoq\]),inthe specialcas e $q_{ i} =1/ 2 $, is  re lated  to th e  Modif ied Polyt ro p ic Car d assian( M PC ) mo del [@gondolo]. T h is model dependson thr ee pa r a met ers : $m$ (den ot ed by $q$ in[ @g o n d olo ] ), $n$ and $\ Omega _{m0} $ . I f we i de nti f y, $%\Omeg a_ {m0 }=\Omega _{ m\in fty }$, $ m=1/(\ t au (1-2 q _{f}))$  and $ n=2 /3( 1+q_ { f} )$,it fol l ow s t h atthe twomo de ls ha ve t h e s amekin emat ics.Note that, si nce  $%q _{f }<0$,  thecond it ion $ n<2/3$  foll ow s naturally. We  rem ark thatinth e M PC  mode l , $%
\ Ome ga_{m0}$is thep res en t v al ue of the matter d en s i ty  paramet er, wh i le  $ \ Omega _{ m\ inf ty } $ is de fine d  a t high r edshif t .Th ese two  q uantit ie s d o n ot ne c essa rily h ave thesamev alue in the ge n eral case if, fo r in s tanc e,dark matter  and dark  ene r gy  ar e  coup led [ @c o up ] . As an example, co ns ider m odels  with a varia ble coupli n g betweendark ma t ter and dark e nergy  (assumedt o have c onsta nt equat ion of st a t e $w_x$) , a ndsuc h t h a t$\rho_X/\rho_ m = \rho _{ X0}/\rh o_{ m0} a^{ \xi }$[@d ala l] . These m odels ca nbe  d es cri bed b y  Eqn. (\ [h q1b \] ) i f wei dentif y $\O mega _{ m0 } =\O mega _{ m \i n f ty } ^{ 1/ \tau (1- 2q _f)}$ , $\ x i=1 /\tau$and $w_X= -(1 - 2q_f )/ 3$ . As re marked before ,in our for mu lat ion it i s not ne cessary to make stronga ssumpti ons  abou t th e dark se cto r or g rav i ty the ory. I n MPC  m ode l the u n i ve rse  c omponentsa r e s pecif ie d to  be mat ter and radiation; the re is no dark  en ergy . Th e p a ra m etr iz a tio n (\[novoq\]) inc ludes theMP C  m odel (andt heco uplingmodelsabove )  as spe cial case s.

Negle ct ingb a ryo ns, the qu artessen ce Chaply g in mo d el  $(p= -M^ {4(\al ph a + 1)}/\ rho ^{ \ alp ha
}) $ [@qu ar tessen ce],is  obtaine d if we assume $q_{i}=1 /
 of_$\Omega _{m\infty_}$ is very useful_to make_connections_with models_already_discussed in the_literature. For instance,_it is simple to_verify from (\[hq1b\])_that_the parametrization (\[novoq\]), in the special case $q_{i}=1/2$, is related to the Modified Polytropic_Cardassian (MPC)_model [@gondolo]._This_model_depends on three parameters: $m$_(denoted by $q$ in [@gondolo]),_$n$ and_$\Omega _{m0}$. If we identify, $%
\Omega _{m0}=\Omega _{m\infty_}$,_$m=1/(\tau (1-2q_{f}))$ and_$n=2/3(1+q_{f})
$, it follows that the two models have the_same kinematics. Note that, since $%
q_{f}<0$,_the condition $n<2/3$_follows_naturally._We remark that in_the MPC model, $%
\Omega _{m0}$ is_the present value of the matter_density parameter, while $\Omega _{m\infty }$ is_defined at high redshift. These two_quantities do not necessarily have_the same_value in the general case_if, for instance,_dark matter_and dark energy_are coupled [@coup]. As an example,_consider models with_a variable coupling between dark matter_and_dark energy (assumed_to_have_constant equation_of state $w_x$),_and_such that_$\rho_X/\rho_m=\rho_{X0}/\rho_{m0}_a^{\xi}$ [@dalal]. These models can be_described_by Eqn. (\[hq1b\]) if we identify $\Omega_{m0}=\Omega__{m\infty }^{1/\tau(1-2q_f)}$, $\xi=1/\tau$ and_$w_X=-(1-2q_f)/3$._As remarked before, in_our formulation it is not_necessary to make strong assumptions about_the dark_sector or_gravity theory. In MPC model the universe components are specified to_be matter and radiation; there is_no dark energy. The_parametrization (\[novoq\])_includes_the MPC model_(and_the coupling_models above) as special cases.

Neglecting baryons, the_quartessence Chaplygin_model $(p=-M^{4(\alpha +1)}/\rho ^{\alpha
})$ [@quartessence], is_obtained if we assume_$q_{i}=1/