1\]) should be reproduced. On the other hand, for $\beta > \beta_c$, $\left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
    \right \rangle \omega^{i \sum_{\mu =1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu } }$ is maximized at $x_c=(1-\tanh\frac{n\beta}{2})/2 < x^*$. This provides $$\begin{aligned}
    \left \langle Z^n \right \rangle
    = \exp N \left (\log 2+ \alpha \log \left ( \cosh \frac{n \beta }{2} \right )
    \right ),
    \label{RS2_appendix}\end{aligned}$$ which is identical to the RS2 solution of CDREM, Eq. (\[rs2\]), and equivalent to Eq. (\[rs2\_ours\]). As Eq. (\[rs2\]) can be dominant at $n=1,2,\ldots$ only for $\beta > \beta_c$, this is consistent with the result of the replica analysis of CDREM.

-   [1RSB]{}\
    In 1RSB, $n$ replica levels are assumed to be equally allocated to $n/m$ levels. Therefore, for a given level $i$, $$\begin{aligned}
    \sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}=
    \left \{
    \begin{array}{ll}
    m & (\mbox{when $i$ is the $n/m$ allocated energy levels}), \cr
    0 & (\mbox{otherwise}).
    \end{array}
    \right.\end{aligned}$$ When $i$ is the allocated level, $$\begin{aligned}
    \left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
    \right \rangle 
    &\sim &
    \left \{
    \begin{array}{ll}
    \gamma_i^m 
    \to \exp\left [m N \left ( (1-\alpha)\log 2 + \alpha H (x) 
    \right )\right ]& (x > x^*), \cr
    \gamma_i \to 
    \exp\left [N \left (
1\ ]) should be reproduced. On the other hand, for $ \beta > \beta_c$, $ \left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i, i_\mu } } 
     \right \rangle \omega^{i \sum_{\mu = 1}^n \delta_{i, i_\mu } } $ is maximized at $ x_c=(1-\tanh\frac{n\beta}{2})/2 < x^*$. This provide $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \left \langle Z^n \right \rangle 
     = \exp N \left (\log 2 + \alpha \log \left (\cosh \frac{n \beta } { 2 } \right) 
     \right), 
     \label{RS2_appendix}\end{aligned}$$ which is identical to the RS2 solution of CDREM, Eq. (\[rs2\ ]), and equivalent to Eq. (\[rs2\_ours\ ]). As Eq. (\[rs2\ ]) can be prevailing at $ n=1,2,\ldots$ only for $ \beta > \beta_c$, this is consistent with the resultant role of the replica psychoanalysis of CDREM. 

 -    [ 1RSB]{}\ 
     In 1RSB, $ n$ replica levels are assumed to be equally allocate to $ n / m$ level. Therefore, for a contribute level $ i$, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i, i_\mu}= 
     \left \ { 
     \begin{array}{ll } 
     m & (\mbox{when $ i$ is the $ n / m$ allocated department of energy levels }), \cr 
     0 & (\mbox{otherwise }). 
     \end{array } 
     \right.\end{aligned}$$ When $ i$ is the allocated level, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i, i_\mu } } 
     \right \rangle 
     & \sim & 
     \left \ { 
     \begin{array}{ll } 
     \gamma_i^m 
     \to \exp\left [ m N \left (( 1-\alpha)\log 2 + \alpha H (x) 
     \right) \right ] & (x > x^ *), \cr 
     \gamma_i \to 
     \exp\left [ N \left (
1\]) shluld be reproduced. On tht other hand, for $\ywta > \bxta_c$, $\lert \langld n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
    \rigit \rqngle \omega^{i \sum_{\mu =1}^n \delta_{i,k_\mu } }$ is laximizee at $z_c=(1-\tanh\frac{i\geta}{2})/2 < x^*$. This lvovidzs $$\begin{aligned}
    \left \latgle Z^n \right \savgpe
    = \exp N \left (\log 2+ \alpha \log \lest ( \cosn \vrac{n \beta }{2} \ridht )
    \rjght ),
    \label{RS2_appendix}\end{aligned}$$ which ps identical to tne RS2 solution of CDREM, Eq. (\[rs2\]), wnd equivalent to Fq. (\[rs2\_ours\]). Aw Eq. (\[es2\]) can be dooinant at $n=1,2,\ldots$ only ror $\beta > \beta_c$, this is consistdnt wnth the resolf lx the replira anajysis of CDRCK.

-   [1RST]{}\
    In 1RSB, $n$ replica letels are assumed to be eqnally allocated to $n/i$ levels. Dhzrefore, for a given lwvwl $i$, $$\tegit{aliebed}
    \snm_{\mh=1}^n \delha_{i,m_\mu}=
    \left \{
    \begin{aeray}{ll}
    m & (\mbox{whtn $y$ is the $n/m$ almocateq qnergy levels}), \cr
    0 & (\mbox{otherwise}).
    \tnd{arday}
    \right.\end{aligned}$$ Qhen $i$ is the allocatgd level, $$\bqgin{aligned}
    \left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
    \righv \fanyoe 
    &\slm &
    \left \{
    \begin{array}{ll}
    \gamma_i^m 
    \tj \ecp\keft [m N \left ( (1-\alpha)\log 2 + \appnw H (x) 
    \rigft )\rigkf ]& (x > x^*), \cr
    \gamma_i \to 
    \exp\lwft [N \lefu (
1\]) should be reproduced. On the other $\beta \beta_c$, $\left n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} \right } is maximized at < x^*$. This $$\begin{aligned} \left \langle Z^n \right \rangle \exp N \left (\log 2+ \alpha \log \left ( \cosh \frac{n \beta }{2} ) \right ), \label{RS2_appendix}\end{aligned}$$ which is identical to the RS2 solution of CDREM, (\[rs2\]), equivalent Eq. As Eq. (\[rs2\]) can be dominant at $n=1,2,\ldots$ only for $\beta > \beta_c$, this is consistent the result of the replica analysis of CDREM. [1RSB]{}\ In 1RSB, $n$ levels are assumed to be allocated $n/m$ levels. for given $i$, $$\begin{aligned} \sum_{\mu=1}^n \left \{ \begin{array}{ll} m & (\mbox{when $i$ is the $n/m$ allocated energy levels}), \cr 0 & (\mbox{otherwise}). \right.\end{aligned}$$ When the allocated $$\begin{aligned} \langle \delta_{i,i_\mu}} \right \rangle \left \{ \begin{array}{ll} \gamma_i^m \to \exp\left ( (1-\alpha)\log 2 + \alpha H (x) \right ]& (x x^*), \cr \gamma_i \to \exp\left [N (
1\]) should be reproduced. On the otHer hand, for $\Beta > \bEta_C$, $\leFt \LangLe n_i^{\Sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mU}} 
    \RighT \rangle \omega^{i \sum_{\mu =1}^n \delTa_{i,i_\mU } }$ iS MaxiMIzEd at $x_C=(1-\tanh\frAC{n\BETa}{2})/2 < x^*$. thIs ProViDEs $$\Begin{AliGned}
    \lefT \langle Z^n \rIghT \rAngle
    = \exp N \lefT (\LoG 2+ \alpha \log \lEft ( \Cosh \frac{n \betA }{2} \riGht )
    \rigHt ),
    \LabEL{RS2_apPenDix}\enD{alignED}$$ which Is identicAl TO the RS2 SOlution OF cDrEM, EQ. (\[rs2\]), and equivalent tO eq. (\[RS2\_ours\]). As Eq. (\[rs2\]) can Be domiNaNT aT $N=1,2,\LdoTs$ oNly for $\beta > \BeTa_c$, thIS is consIStENT WitH The result of thE replica anaLYsiS of CDReM.

-   [1rSB]{}\
    iN 1RSB, $n$ rEplicA lEVelS are assumed To be Equally alLocateD To $n/m$ levELs. ThereFore, foR a gIveN levEL $i$, $$\BeGin{AlIGneD}
    \SuM_{\mu=1}^N \DelTa_{i,i_\mu}=
    \leFt \{
    \BeGin{arRay}{lL}
    M & (\MBOx{whEn $i$ Is thE $n/m$ alLocated energy LevEls}), \cR
    0 & (\MboX{otheRwise}).
    \End{aRrAy}
    \rigHt.\end{aLigneD}$$ WHen $i$ is the allocaTed lEvel, $$\begin{AliGnEd}
    \lEfT \langLE n_i^{\sum_{\Mu=1}^n \DelTa_{i,i_\mu}} 
    \rIght \ranGLe 
    &\sIm &
    \LEFT \{
    \bEgin{array}{ll}
    \gamma_i^m 
    \To \EXP\lEft [m N \lefT ( (1-\alpha)\LOg 2 + \AlPHa H (x) 
    \righT )\rIghT ]& (x > x^*), \cR
    \GAmma_i \To 
    \exP\LeFt [N \left (
1\]) should be reproduced.  On the ot her h and , f or  $\b eta> \beta_c$, $\ l eft\langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu =1}^n  \ d elta _ {i ,i_\m u}} 
  \ r i ght  \ ra ngl e\ om ega^{ i \ sum_{\m u =1}^n \d elt a_ {i,i_\mu } } $  i s maximize d a t $x_c=(1-\t anh \frac{ n\ bet a }{2}) /2< x^* $. Thi s  provi des $$\be gi n {align e d}
   \ l ef t \l angle Z^n \right\ ra n gle
    = \exp  N \le ft (\ l o g 2 + \ alpha \log  \ left(  \cosh\ fr a c { n \ b eta }{2} \rig ht )
    \r i ght  ),
  \la b el{RS2 _appe nd i x}\ end{aligned }$$which isidenti c al to t h e RS2 s olutio n o f C DREM ,  E q.  (\ [r s 2\] ) ,and equ ivalentto  E q. (\ [rs2 \ _ o u rs\] ).As E q. (\ [rs2\]) can b e d omin a ntat $n =1,2, \ldo ts $ onl y for$\bet a> \beta_c$, thi s is  consiste ntwi thth e res u lt ofthe  re plica a nalysis ofCD R E M .
-   [1RSB]{}\
   I n 1R SB, $n$replic a  l ev e ls are a ss ume d to b e equ ally al locatedto $n/ m $le vels. T he refore ,for  agiven leve l $i$,  $$\begi n{ali g ned}
    \sum_ { \mu=1}^n \del t a_ { i ,i _ \mu} =
   \left \{ 
  \beg in{a r ra y}{ l l}
   m &  ( \ mb o x{when $i$ is the $ n/ m$ all ocate d energy leve ls}), \cr 0 & (\m box{ o th e rwise}).
    \ end{a rray}
   \ right.\e nd{al igned}$$  When $i$ i s the al loc ate d l eve l ,  $ $\begin{align e d }
  \left \ lan gle n_i ^{\ sum _{\ mu= 1} ^n \delta _{i,i_\m u} }
  \r ight\ rangle    & \s im&
  \left\{
   \b eg in { arr ay}{ll}  \gam ma _i ^m    \ to \e xp\l e ft[m N \l eft ( (1- \al p ha)\ lo g2 + \al pha H (x) 
  \right )\r ig ht]& (x> x^*), \c r
    \gamma_i \to 
  \exp\le ft[N \l eft(
1\]) should_be reproduced._On the other hand,_for $\beta_>_\beta_c$, $\left_\langle_n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
_  _\right \rangle \omega^{i \sum_{\mu_=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu }_}$_is maximized at $x_c=(1-\tanh\frac{n\beta}{2})/2 < x^*$. This provides $$\begin{aligned}
    \left \langle_Z^n_\right \rangle
___ = \exp N \left_(\log 2+ \alpha \log \left_( \cosh_\frac{n \beta }{2} \right )
   _\right_),
  _ \label{RS2_appendix}\end{aligned}$$ which is identical to the RS2 solution_of CDREM, Eq. (\[rs2\]), and equivalent_to Eq. (\[rs2\_ours\])._As_Eq._(\[rs2\]) can be dominant_at $n=1,2,\ldots$ only for $\beta >_\beta_c$, this is consistent with the_result of the replica analysis of CDREM.

-_  [1RSB]{}\
   _In 1RSB, $n$ replica levels_are assumed_to be equally allocated to_$n/m$ levels. Therefore,_for a_given level $i$,_$$\begin{aligned}
    \sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}=
_  _\left \{
    \begin{array}{ll}
__  m_&_(\mbox{when_$i$ is_the $n/m$ allocated_energy_levels}), \cr
__  0 & (\mbox{otherwise}).
 __ \end{array}
    \right.\end{aligned}$$ When_$i$ is the allocated_level,_$$\begin{aligned}
   _\left \langle n_i^{\sum_{\mu=1}^n \delta_{i,i_\mu}} 
_   \right \rangle 
_ _ &\sim_&
    \left \{
    \begin{array}{ll}
 _  \gamma_i^m 
  _ \to \exp\left [m_N \left_(_(1-\alpha)\log 2 +_\alpha_H (x)_
    \right )\right ]&_(x >_x^*), \cr
    \gamma_i_\to 
  __\exp\left [N \left (