 unstable mode. Following the same steps as before to compute this eigenmode from eq. , we find that it derives from the following displacement field: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:delta'}
u_{r,\star} \propto \frac{1}{r}  \frac{\cos (2\theta)}{1 + \delta_\star \cos (4\theta) }  \,, u_{\theta,\star} = 0 \,. \end{aligned}$$ in polar coordinates. Here $ \delta_\star = \frac{\mu _3-\mu _2}{\mu _2+\mu _3+2 \omega_\star }$ quantifies the anisotropy of the elastic medium, as the parameter $\delta$ defined below eq. .

Another consequence of eq.  concerns the situations of marginal stability, when $\omega_\star \to 0$, or $\mu_0 \to \mu_2 + \sqrt{\mu_2 \mu_3}$ by eq. . These situations are on no account mathematical curiosities, but occur whenever a plastic instability is about to take place during the *quasi-static* deformation of disordered solids; this instability is triggered by the marginally stable soft mode [@cao2017localisation]. In this case ($\omega_\star \to 0$), the two anisotropy parameters, $\delta$ and $\delta_\star$, converge and the soft mode (given by eq. \[eq:delta’\]) coincides with the equilibrium configuration that will be reached after the development of this plastic instability, up to a proportionality coefficient. Besides, this mode is not affected by the presence of inertia, which becomes negligible for $\omega \to 0$. Therefore, in quasi-static protocols, we can identify the marginal soft mode and the equilibrium configuration.

![Time evolution of the displacement field $u(r,\theta)$ in response to a single plastic event for a highly anisotropic incompressible material at fixed macroscopic strain $\overline{e_2}=0$, with $\mu_2 = 1/19$ and $\mu_3 = 1$ (so that $\delta = 0.9$, as in Fig. \[fig:displacement\_th\], (c,f)). We chose an anharmonic potential $W(e_2) = -\mu_0 e_2^2 - \frac32 e_2^3 + e_2^4$, where $\mu_0 = \mu_2 +
unstable mode. Following the same footstep as earlier to compute this eigenmode from eq.  , we find that it derives from the postdate displacement field: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: delta' } 
 u_{r,\star } \propto \frac{1}{r }   \frac{\cos (2\theta)}{1 + \delta_\star \cos (4\theta) }   \, , u_{\theta,\star } = 0 \, . \end{aligned}$$ in polar coordinate. Here $ \delta_\star = \frac{\mu _ 3-\mu _ 2}{\mu _ 2+\mu _ 3 + 2 \omega_\star } $ quantifies the anisotropy of the elastic medium, as the parameter $ \delta$ defined below eq.  . 

 Another consequence of eq.    refer the situations of marginal constancy, when $ \omega_\star \to 0 $, or $ \mu_0 \to \mu_2 + \sqrt{\mu_2 \mu_3}$ by eq.  . These situations are on no account mathematical curiosities, but happen whenever a plastic instability is about to subscribe place during the * quasi - static * distortion of disordered solids; this instability is trigger by the marginally stable soft mode   [ @cao2017localisation ]. In this case ($ \omega_\star \to 0 $), the two anisotropy parameter, $ \delta$ and $ \delta_\star$, converge and the soft mode (given by eq.   \[eq: delta’\ ]) coincides with the equilibrium shape that will be reached after the development of this plastic instability, up to a proportionality coefficient. Besides, this mode is not feign by the bearing of inertia, which becomes negligible for $ \omega \to 0$. Therefore, in quasi - static protocols, we can identify the marginal cushy manner and the equilibrium configuration. 

! [ Time development of the displacement sphere $ u(r,\theta)$ in reply to a single plastic consequence for a highly anisotropic incompressible material at fix macroscopic strain $ \overline{e_2}=0 $, with $ \mu_2 = 1/19 $ and $ \mu_3 = 1 $ (so that $ \delta = 0.9 $, as in Fig.   \[fig: displacement\_th\ ], (c, f) ). We chose an anharmonic electric potential $ W(e_2) = -\mu_0 e_2 ^ 2 - \frac32 e_2 ^ 3 + e_2 ^ 4 $, where $ \mu_0 = \mu_2 +
 undtable mode. Following tht same steps as bgfire to compufe this digenmode from eq. , we find thet ir deruves from the followine displacvment fieod: $$\btgin{aligned}
\label{eq:delta'}
u_{r,\star} \pdlpto \hrac{1}{r}  \frac{\cos (2\jheta)}{1 + \delta_\vtar \cos (4\theta) }  \,, b_{\theta,\star} = 0 \,. \end{aligned}$$ in polar cojrdinatrs. Here $ \delta_\stwr = \gwac{\mh _3-\mu _2}{\mu _2+\mu _3+2 \omega_\star }$ quantifies fhe anivotropy of thr elastic medium, as the pagameher $\delta$ defined helow eq. .

Anojger xonsequence uf eq.  conctrus the situztions of marginal stability, whdn $\omzga_\star \to 0$, oe $\mk_0 \to \mu_2 + \sqrv{\mu_2 \mu_3}$ by eq. . These situatimns are on no account mavhemqtical curiosities, buv occur whenever a pjastic invtcbility is about to tqkw plawe dgrine thd *qhaxi-atatic* dehormation or disorderee solids; this instanijpyy is triggeded by tre marginally stable soft mode [@cao2017localivatjon]. In this case ($\omega_\srar \to 0$), the two anisojropy paraieters, $\delta$ and $\delta_\star$, converge and the soft kode (jixen bn eq. \[dw:dflta’\]) coincides with the equilibrium configuraejom nhat will be reacmed after the devekoomrgt of this plxstic nhsfability, up to a pgoportijnaliry coeffisieny. Besides, this mode is not qffected by nhe presence of inertic, which becooes meglibible for $\omega \to 0$. Thexefore, in quasi-stwtic protkzols, we can idengifj tha marginal soft mode and tre equiliurium configjratoon.

![Timq evolutioj of bve displacement fifld $u(t,\theta)$ in responde to a single plastic event foc a highly anosmtrmpic incjmprexsible materiwl at fixed maeroscopie strakn $\overlinv{e_2}=0$, with $\mn_2 = 1/19$ and $\mu_3 = 1$ (so that $\deltd = 0.9$, as in Fig. \[hig:displasemebt\_th\], (c,f)). We zfose an anharmpnic poteuuial $W(e_2) = -\my_0 e_2^2 - \frac32 e_2^3 + e_2^4$, wheve $\mu_0 = \mu_2 +
unstable mode. Following the same steps as compute eigenmode from , we find following field: $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:delta'} \propto \frac{1}{r} \frac{\cos + \delta_\star \cos (4\theta) } \,, = 0 \,. \end{aligned}$$ in polar coordinates. Here $ \delta_\star = \frac{\mu _3-\mu _2+\mu _3+2 \omega_\star }$ quantifies the anisotropy of the elastic medium, as the $\delta$ below . consequence of eq. concerns the situations of marginal stability, when $\omega_\star \to 0$, or $\mu_0 \to + \sqrt{\mu_2 \mu_3}$ by eq. . These situations on no account mathematical but occur whenever a plastic is to take during *quasi-static* of disordered solids; instability is triggered by the marginally stable soft mode [@cao2017localisation]. In this case ($\omega_\star \to 0$), the anisotropy parameters, $\delta_\star$, converge the mode by eq. \[eq:delta’\]) the equilibrium configuration that will be development of this plastic instability, up to a coefficient. Besides, mode is not affected by the of inertia, which becomes negligible for $\omega \to Therefore, in quasi-static protocols, we can identify the marginal soft mode and the equilibrium configuration. of the displacement field in response to single event a anisotropic incompressible at fixed macroscopic strain $\overline{e_2}=0$, with $\mu_2 = 1/19$ and $\mu_3 1$ (so that $\delta = 0.9$, as in Fig. \[fig:displacement\_th\], chose anharmonic potential $W(e_2) -\mu_0 e_2^2 - \frac32 + where $\mu_0 = \mu_2
 unstable mode. Following the sAme steps as BeforE to ComPuTe thIs eiGenmode from eq. , wE Find That it derives from the foLlowiNg DIsplACeMent fIeld: $$\begIN{aLIGneD}
\lAbEl{eQ:dELtA'}
u_{r,\stAr} \pRopto \frAc{1}{r}  \frac{\cos (2\TheTa)}{1 + \Delta_\star \cos (4\THeTa) }  \,, u_{\theta,\stAr} = 0 \,. \eNd{aligned}$$ in pOlaR coordInAteS. here $ \dEltA_\star = \Frac{\mu _3-\MU _2}{\mu _2+\mu _3+2 \oMega_\star }$ qUaNTifies THe anisoTROpY of tHe elastic medium, as THe PArameter $\delta$ dEfined BeLOw EQ. .

anoTheR consequenCe Of eq.  cONcerns tHE sITUAtiONs of marginal sTability, wheN $\OmeGa_\star \To 0$, Or $\mU_0 \To \mu_2 + \sqRt{\mu_2 \mU_3}$ bY Eq. . THese situatiOns aRe on no accOunt maTHematicAL curiosIties, bUt oCcuR wheNEvEr A plAsTIc iNStAbiLIty Is about tO tAkE placE durING THe *quAsi-StatIc* defOrmation of disOrdEred SOliDs; thiS instAbilItY is trIggereD by thE mArginally stable Soft Mode [@cao2017loCalIsAtiOn]. in thiS Case ($\omEga_\StaR \to 0$), the tWo anisoTRopY pARAMeTers, $\delta$ and $\delta_\sTaR$, COnVerge and The sofT MoDe (GIven by eq. \[Eq:DelTa’\]) coINCides With THe EquilibrIum conFIgUrAtion thAt Will be ReAchEd aFter tHE devElopmeNt of this PlastIC instability, up TO a proportionaLItY COeFFiciEnt. besides, this Mode IS not AffeCTeD by THe preSence Of INeRTia, which becomes neglIgIble foR $\omegA \to 0$. Therefore, iN quasi-statIC PRotocols, We caN IdENtify the marginAl sofT mode and thE EquilibrIum coNfiguratIon.

![Time evOLUtion of tHe dIspLacEmeNT FiEld $u(r,\theta)$ in rESPonsE tO a singlE plAstic evEnt For A hiGhlY aNisotropiC incomprEsSiBlE mAteRial aT Fixed macRoScoPiC stRain $\oVErline{E_2}=0$, with $\Mu_2 = 1/19$ anD $\mU_3 = 1$ (sO ThaT $\delta = 0.9$, aS In fIG. \[fig:DiSpLaceMenT\_tH\], (c,f)). We ChosE An aNharmonIc potentiAl $W(E_2) = -\Mu_0 e_2^2 - \fRaC32 e_2^3 + E_2^4$, where $\mU_0 = \mu_2 +
 unstable mode. Followingthe same s tepsasbef or e to  com pute this eige n mode  from eq. , we find th at it  d e rive s  f rom t he foll o wi n g  di sp la cem en t  f ield:  $$ \begin{ aligned}
\ lab el {eq:delta'}u _{ r,\star} \ pro pto \frac{1} {r}   \fra c{ \co s  (2\t het a)}{1  + \de l ta_\st ar \cos ( 4\ t heta)}   \,, u _ { \t heta ,\star} = 0 \,. \ e nd { aligned}$$ inpolarco o rd i n ate s.Here $ \de lt a_\st a r = \fr a c{ \ m u  _3 - \mu _2}{\mu _ 2+\mu _3+2\ ome ga_\st ar  }$ quanti fiesth e  an isotropy of  the  elasticmedium ,  as the paramet er $\d elt a$defi n ed  b elo we q.. 
Ano t her  consequ en ce  of e q. c o n c erns  th e si tuati ons of margin alstab i lit y, wh en $\ omeg a_ \star  \to 0 $, or  $ \mu_0 \to \mu_2  + \ sqrt{\mu_ 2 \ mu _3} $by eq .  . The sesit uations  are on noac c o u nt  mathematical curi os i t ie s, but o ccur w h en ev e r a plas ti c i nsta b i lityis a b ou t to tak e plac e  d ur ing the  * quasi- st ati c*defor m atio n of d isordere d sol i ds; this insta b ility is trig g er e d  b y  the  ma rginally st able soft  mod e  [ @ca o 2017l ocali sa t io n ]. In this case ($\ om ega_\s tar \ to 0$), the t wo anisotr o p y  paramet ers, $\ d elta$ and $\de lta_\ star$, con v erge and  thesoft mod e (givenb y  eq. \[e q:d elt a’\ ])c o in cides with th e equi li brium c onf igurati ontha t w ill  b e reached  after t he  d ev el opm ent o f  this pl as tic  i nst abili t y, upto aprop or ti o nal ity coe f fi c i ent.  B es ides , t hi s mod e is not  affect ed by the  pr e senc eof  inerti a, which beco me s negligib le  fo r $\om e g a \to 0$ . Therefore, in quasi-s t atic pr oto cols,  wecan ident ify  the m arg i nal so ft mod e and  t hee q uilib r i um  co nf iguration. ![T ime e vo luti on of t he displacement fi e ld$u(r,\theta)$  in  res p o ns e t o  a sin gl e  pl a s tic event for a  highly an is o tr opic incom p res si ble mat erial a t fix e d macro scopic st rain $\ov er line { e _2} =0$, with$\mu_2 =  1/19$ an d  $\mu _ 3= 1$(so  that$\ del ta =0.9$,a s i n Fig . \[fi g: displa cemen t\ _th\], ( c,f)). We chose an anha rmonic  pote nti al $W(e_2 ) = -\m u_0 e_2^2  - \ frac32 e_2 ^3+ e _2^4$ , w h ere $ \mu_ 0  =  \m u _2 +
 unstable_mode. Following_the same steps as_before to_compute_this eigenmode_from_eq. , we find_that it derives_from the following displacement_field: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:delta'}
u_{r,\star} \propto_\frac{1}{r}_ \frac{\cos (2\theta)}{1 + \delta_\star \cos (4\theta) }  \,, u_{\theta,\star} = 0 \,._\end{aligned}$$_in polar_coordinates._Here_$ \delta_\star = \frac{\mu _3-\mu__2}{\mu _2+\mu _3+2 \omega_\star }$_quantifies the_anisotropy of the elastic medium, as the parameter_$\delta$_defined below eq. .

Another_consequence of eq.  concerns the situations of marginal stability,_when $\omega_\star \to 0$, or $\mu_0_\to \mu_2 +_\sqrt{\mu_2_\mu_3}$_by eq. . These situations_are on no account mathematical curiosities,_but occur whenever a plastic instability_is about to take place during the_*quasi-static* deformation of disordered solids; this_instability is triggered by the_marginally stable_soft mode [@cao2017localisation]. In this case_($\omega_\star \to 0$),_the two_anisotropy parameters, $\delta$_and $\delta_\star$, converge and the soft_mode (given by_eq. \[eq:delta’\]) coincides with the equilibrium configuration_that_will be reached_after_the_development of_this plastic instability,_up_to a_proportionality_coefficient. Besides, this mode is not_affected_by the presence of inertia, which becomes_negligible for $\omega \to_0$._Therefore, in quasi-static protocols,_we can identify the marginal_soft mode and the equilibrium configuration.

![Time_evolution of_the displacement_field $u(r,\theta)$ in response to a single plastic event for a_highly anisotropic incompressible material at fixed_macroscopic strain $\overline{e_2}=0$, with_$\mu_2 =_1/19$_and $\mu_3 =_1$_(so that_$\delta = 0.9$, as in Fig. \[fig:displacement\_th\], (c,f))._We chose_an anharmonic potential $W(e_2) = -\mu_0_e_2^2 - \frac32 e_2^3_+_e_2^4$, where $\mu_0 = \mu_2 +