 generated a map of independent Gaussian random variables in each voxel with $\sigma=1$. We then smoothed (each slice of) the map using the same two-dimensional Gaussian with FWHM $2R$, which gave the correct angular correlations. The map was then rescaled so that each slice has the expected root mean square (RMS) value of the noise for the SKA, which depends on the redshift and the smoothing radius $R$ approximately as \[@Koopmans:2015; also L. Koopmans, personal communication\]: $$\label{Eq:noise} 
\rm \sigma_{\rm thermal}=\begin{cases} a \left( \frac{1+z}{17}
\right)^b &\mbox{if } z \leq 16\, \\a \left( \frac{1+z}{17} \right)^c
&{\rm otherwise}\, \end{cases}$$ where $a$, $b$ and $c$ are the numerical coefficients for each smoothing radius given in Table \[table:noisecoef\] (assuming a 1000 hr integration by the SKA). Finally, the resulting noise map was added to the signal.

   $R\, \rm[Mpc]$   10    20    40
  ---------------- ----- ----- -----
   $a\, \rm[mK]$    15    4.0   1.8
        $b$         3.1   2.7   2.8
        $c$         4.7   5.1   4.2

  : The numerical coefficients for each smoothing radius, for thermal noise of the SKA as given by Equation \[Eq:noise\].[]{data-label="table:noisecoef"}

A given resolution corresponds to 2-D Gaussian smoothing with a radius $R$, but it is also useful to consider applying additional 3-D smoothing as a step in the data analysis. The idea is to produce a more isotropic image, which is more conducive for measuring statistics that are designed to probe spherically-averaged structure. Now, while any smoothing removes some information in the map, it also smooths out and thus lowers the thermal noise. In our results below, we have found that the differences are small between using the images with or without 3-D smoothing, but in most cases the 3-D smoothing increases the signal-to-noise ratio, i.e., the noise is smoothed-out more than the
generated a map of independent Gaussian random variables in each voxel with $ \sigma=1$. We then smooth (each piece of) the map using the same two - dimensional Gaussian with FWHM $ 2R$, which yield the correct angular correlations. The function was then rescaled so that each slice has the expect root mean square (RMS) value of the noise for the SKA, which count on the redshift and the smoothing spoke $ R$ approximately as \[@Koopmans:2015; also L.   Koopmans, personal communication\ ]: $ $ \label{Eq: noise } 
 \rm \sigma_{\rm thermal}=\begin{cases } a \left (\frac{1+z}{17 } 
 \right)^b & \mbox{if } z \leq 16\, \\a \left (\frac{1+z}{17 } \right)^c 
 & { \rm otherwise}\, \end{cases}$$ where $ a$, $ b$ and $ c$ are the numerical coefficients for each smoothing radius given in Table   \[table: noisecoef\ ] (wear a 1000   hr integration by the SKA). Finally, the result noise map was added to the signal. 

    $ R\, \rm[Mpc]$    10     20     40 
   ---------------- ----- ----- ----- 
    $ a\, \rm[mK]$     15     4.0    1.8 
         $ b$          3.1    2.7    2.8 
         $ c$          4.7    5.1    4.2 

  : The numeric coefficients for each smoothing radius, for thermal noise of the SKA as given by Equation   \[Eq: noise\].[]{data - label="table: noisecoef " } 

 A given settlement corresponds to 2 - D Gaussian smoothing with a radius $ R$, but it is also useful to consider applying additional 3 - D smoothing as a step in the data analysis. The idea is to produce a more isotropic image, which is more conducive for measuring statistic that are plan to probe spherically - averaged social organization. nowadays, while any smoothing remove some information in the map, it besides smooths out and therefore lowers the thermal noise. In our results downstairs, we have found that the differences are small between using the images with or without 3 - D smoothing, but in most cases the 3 - D smoothing increases the signal - to - noise ratio, i.e., the randomness is smoothed - out more than the
 gejerated a map of indepenaent Gaussian rcbdom veriablea in eacf voxel with $\sigma=1$. We then sloithed (each slice of) the map using thv same twi-dimtnsional Gaussian with FWMI $2R$, smich yate the correct sngular cosrelations. The mxp was then rescaled so that each slise has yhf expected rooj meam squzge (RMS) value of the noise for tge SKA, xhich depends om the redshift and the smolthijg radius $R$ approxlmately as \[@Joopiqns:2015; also L. Koupmans, personal communjcation\]: $$\label{Eq:noise} 
\rm \sigma_{\rm therkal}=\begin{cawew} a \neft( \frac{1+z}{17}
\rmght)^b &\ibox{if } z \leq 16\, \\a \lefd( \frac{1+z}{17} \right)^c
&{\rm othevwise}\, \ene{cases}$$ where $a$, $b$ and $r$ are the numerical soefficietta for each smoothunt radhus civev in Taglx \[tagle:noideckef\] (assumihg a 1000 hr intwgration by the SKA). Fybally, the reshlting njise map was added to the signal.

   $R\, \rm[Kpc]$   10    20    40
  ---------------- ----- ----- -----
   $a\, \rm[nK]$    15    4.0   1.8
        $h$         3.1   2.7   2.8
        $c$         4.7   5.1   4.2

  : The numerical cmeffiridntw nor dqcj smoothing radius, for thermal noise of the SHZ ss given by Equabion \[Eq:noise\].[]{data-labrl="hanje:noisecoef"}

A eiven xssklution correspondd to 2-D Daussuan smootring with a radius $R$, but it is qlso useful no cinsider applying abditional 3-D rmoojhing ss a step in the data aualysia. The idea ls to prosjce a more isotrupib imdge, which is more conducivq for meawuriug statirticx that are desigjed to probe spherically-wverayed sdructure. Nlw, while any smoothing removes some informatipn in the map, it akso smooths ott and thus locers the theroal noise. Pn our revults below, we have foung that the dihferences are smaol betwddn using the ikages witk or qithout 3-D smoothinn, but jn most cases tkt 3-D smoothing incrrasds ehv smgnal-em-noise ratio, i.e., ghe moise is smootheb-ojt mpre than the
generated a map of independent Gaussian random each with $\sigma=1$. then smoothed (each the two-dimensional Gaussian with $2R$, which gave correct angular correlations. The map was rescaled so that each slice has the expected root mean square (RMS) value the noise for the SKA, which depends on the redshift and the smoothing $R$ as also Koopmans, personal communication\]: $$\label{Eq:noise} \rm \sigma_{\rm thermal}=\begin{cases} a \left( \frac{1+z}{17} \right)^b &\mbox{if } z \leq 16\, \left( \frac{1+z}{17} \right)^c &{\rm otherwise}\, \end{cases}$$ where $a$, and $c$ are the coefficients for each smoothing radius in \[table:noisecoef\] (assuming 1000 integration the SKA). Finally, resulting noise map was added to the signal. $R\, \rm[Mpc]$ 10 20 40 ---------------- ----- ----- ----- \rm[mK]$ 15 $b$ 3.1 2.8 4.7 4.2 : The for each smoothing radius, for thermal SKA as given by Equation \[Eq:noise\].[]{data-label="table:noisecoef"} A given corresponds to Gaussian smoothing with a radius $R$, it is also useful to consider applying additional smoothing as a step in the data analysis. The idea is to produce a more which is more conducive measuring statistics that designed probe structure. while any removes some information in the map, it also smooths out and lowers the thermal noise. In our results below, we have the are small between the images with or 3-D but in most cases smoothing the the is more than the
 generated a map of independenT Gaussian rAndom VarIabLeS in eAch vOxel with $\sigma=1$. WE Then Smoothed (each slice of) the Map usInG The sAMe Two-diMensionAL GAUSsiAn WiTh FwHm $2r$, wHich gAve The corrEct angular CorReLations. The maP WaS then rescaLed So that each slIce Has the ExPecTEd rooT meAn squAre (RMS) VAlue of The noise fOr THe SKA, wHIch depeNDS oN the Redshift and the smoOThINg radius $R$ approXimateLy AS \[@KOOPmaNs:2015; aLso L. KoopmaNs, PersoNAl commuNIcATIOn\]: $$\lABel{Eq:noise} 
\rm \sIgma_{\rm thermAL}=\beGin{casEs} A \leFT( \frac{1+z}{17}
\Right)^B &\mBOx{iF } z \leq 16\, \\a \left( \fRac{1+z}{17} \Right)^c
&{\rm oTherwiSE}\, \end{casES}$$ where $a$, $B$ and $c$ aRe tHe nUmerICaL cOefFiCIenTS fOr eACh sMoothing RaDiUs givEn in tABLE \[tabLe:nOiseCoef\] (aSsuming a 1000 hr intEgrAtioN By tHe SKA). finalLy, thE rEsultIng noiSe map WaS added to the signAl.

   $R\, \rM[Mpc]$   10    20    40
  ---------------- ----- ----- -----
   $a\, \rm[mK]$    15    4.0   1.8
        $B$         3.1   2.7   2.8
        $c$         4.7   5.1   4.2

  : THe NumErIcal cOEfficiEntS foR each smOothing RAdiUs, FOR ThErmal noise of the SKA As GIVeN by EquatIon \[Eq:nOIsE\].[]{dATa-label="tAbLe:nOiseCOEf"}

A giVen rESoLution coRrespoNDs To 2-d GaussiAn SmoothInG wiTh a RadiuS $r$, but It is alSo useful To conSIder applying adDItional 3-D smootHInG AS a STep iN thE data analysIs. ThE Idea Is to PRoDucE A more IsotrOpIC iMAge, which is more conduCiVe for mEasurIng statistics That are desIGNEd to probE sphERiCAlly-averaged stRuctuRe. Now, while ANy smoothIng reMoves somE informatION in the maP, it AlsO smOotHS OuT and thus lowerS THe thErMal noisE. In Our resuLts BelOw, wE haVe Found that The diffeReNcEs ArE smAll beTWeen usinG tHe iMaGes With oR WithouT 3-D smoOthiNg, BuT In mOst caseS ThE 3-d SmooThInG incReaSeS the sIgnaL-To-nOise ratIo, i.e., the noIse IS smoOtHeD-out morE than the
 generated a map of indepe ndent Gaus sianran dom  v aria bles  in each voxel with  $\sigma=1$. We then s mooth ed (eac h  s liceof) the ma p usi ng  t hesa m etwo-d ime nsional  Gaussianwit hFWHM $2R$, w h ic h gave the  co rrect angula r c orrela ti ons .  Themap  wasthen r e scaled  so thatea c h slic e  has th e ex pect ed root mean squa r e( RMS) value ofthe no is e  f o r  th e S KA, whichde pends on ther ed s h i fta nd the smooth ing radius$ R$approx im ate l y as \ [@Koo pm a ns: 2015; alsoL. K oopmans,person a l commu n ication \]: $$ \la bel {Eq: n oi se } \r m  \s i gm a_{ \ rmthermal} =\ be gin{c ases } a \lef t(\fra c{1+z }{17}
\right) ^b&\mb o x{i f } z  \leq  16\ ,\\a \ left(\frac {1 +z}{17} \right) ^c
& {\rm othe rwi se }\,  \ end{c a ses}$$  wh ere  $a$, $ b$ and$ c$ar e t he  numerical coeffic ie n t sfor each  smoot h in gr adius gi ve n i n Ta b l e \[t able : no isecoef\ ] (ass u mi ng  a 1000  h r inte gr ati onby th e  SKA ). Fin ally, th e res u lting noise ma p  was added to th e si g nal. 

  $R\, \rm[ Mpc] $    1 0  20   40
 ----- -- - -- - ----- ----- ----- - -- --
  $a\,\rm[mK]$    1 5    4.0 1 . 8
       $b $        3.1   2. 7   2 .8
      $c$        4 .7   5.1    4.2

:  The num eri cal  co eff i c ie nts for eachs m ooth in g radiu s,for the rma l n ois e o fthe SKA a s givenby  E qu at ion  \[Eq : noise\]. [] {da ta -la bel=" t able:n oisec oef" }
A giv en reso l ut i o n co rr es pond s t o2-D G auss i ansmoothi ng with a  ra d ius$R $,  but it  is also usef ul  to consid er  ap plying a dditiona l 3-D smoothing as a st e p in th e d ata a naly sis. Theide a is t o p r oducea more  isot ro pic i mage, w hi chis  more cond u c ive  forme asur ing sta tistics that are d e sig ned to probesph eric a l ly -av e ra g edst r uct u r e. Now, while a ny smoothi ng re moves some inf or mationin themap,i t alsosmooths o ut and th us  low e r s t he thermal  noise.In our re s ultsb el ow, w e h ave fo un d t hat t he dif f ere ncesare sm al l betw een u si ng the i mages with or without 3 -D smo othin g,but in mo stc ase s the 3-D  smo othing inc rea ses  thesig n al-to -noi s erat i o, i. e.,t he noisei ssmo o t he d-out moret h a n t he
 generated_a map_of independent Gaussian random_variables in_each_voxel with_$\sigma=1$._We then smoothed_(each slice of)_the map using the_same two-dimensional Gaussian_with_FWHM $2R$, which gave the correct angular correlations. The map was then rescaled so_that_each slice_has_the_expected root mean square (RMS)_value of the noise for_the SKA,_which depends on the redshift and the smoothing_radius_$R$ approximately as_\[@Koopmans:2015; also L. Koopmans, personal communication\]: $$\label{Eq:noise} 
\rm \sigma_{\rm thermal}=\begin{cases}_a \left( \frac{1+z}{17}
\right)^b &\mbox{if } z_\leq 16\, \\a_\left(_\frac{1+z}{17}_\right)^c
&{\rm otherwise}\, \end{cases}$$ where_$a$, $b$ and $c$ are the_numerical coefficients for each smoothing radius_given in Table \[table:noisecoef\] (assuming a 1000 hr integration_by the SKA). Finally, the resulting_noise map was added to_the signal.

_  $R\, \rm[Mpc]$ _ 10 _ _20  _ 40
  ---------------- ----- -----_-----
  _$a\, \rm[mK]$    15__  4.0___1.8
 _  __ _$b$_     __ 3.1   2.7  _2.8
   __   $c$_    _   4.7  _5.1 _ 4.2

_ : The numerical coefficients for each smoothing radius, for thermal_noise of the SKA as given_by Equation \[Eq:noise\].[]{data-label="table:noisecoef"}

A given resolution_corresponds to_2-D_Gaussian smoothing with_a_radius $R$,_but it is also useful to consider_applying additional_3-D smoothing as a step in_the data analysis. The_idea_is to produce a more isotropic_image, which is more conducive for_measuring statistics that are designed_to_probe_spherically-averaged structure. Now, while any_smoothing removes some information in the_map, it also_smooths out and thus lowers the thermal_noise._In our results below, we have_found_that the differences are small between_using_the_images with or without 3-D_smoothing, but in most cases the_3-D smoothing increases the signal-to-noise ratio, i.e., the noise_is smoothed-out more_than the