ed systems poses some new challenges that do not exist in either area alone [@Nowzari17Event]. As pointed out in [@Nowzari17Event], researchers must consider how to deal with the natural asynchronism introduced into the systems and how to rule out the Zeno behavior. Another challenge is that the separation principle cannot be used for event-triggered control systems anymore [@CRamesh2011].

Existing works have presented a large number of insights into general coordination of networked systems with event-triggered mechanisms. As a specific case study, event-triggered consensus is a longstanding area of research in multi-agent systems; see the references [@Henningsson2008sporadic; @Astrom1999comparison; @PTabuada2007event; @Heemels2008analysis; @Heemels2012an; @RZheng2016stability; @BCheng2018fully; @BCheng2018consensus]. Many survey papers about event-driven control were published, such as [@Nowzari17Event; @lei-ding2018an; @xian-ming-zhang2017an; @xian-ming-zhang2016survey]. Generally speaking, existing consensus protocols are designed for either state consensus of homogeneous networks or output consensus of heterogeneous networks. Noting that for heterogeneous networks, where even the dimensions of states may be different, output consensus is a more meaningful topic than state consensus.

In the field of state consensus of homogeneous networks, [@Garcia2013decentralised; @Meng2013event; @DVDimarogonas2012distributed] presented event-based protocols for single-integrator agents under undirected graphs. To remove the limitation that continuous information was still required in triggering functions of early works, [@Seyboth2013event] proposed triggering functions only based on discrete sampled information. The authors of [@DYang2016Decentralized; @Zhu2014event; @Guo2014a] presented event-driven consensus algorithms for general linear networks. Reference [@HZhang2014observer] studied the event-driven consensus using output feedback control. The event-based consensus control problem with external disturbances was studied in [@LXing2017event; @JLiu2017fixed; @xiao-hua-ge2017event]. Event-driven output consensus of heterogeneous networks was studied in [@WHu2017output; @xdliu2017distributed]. The authors of [@WHu2017cooperative] studied event-based cooperative output regulation problem of heterogeneous networks
ed systems poses some new challenges that do not exist in either sphere entirely [ @Nowzari17Event ]. As point out in [ @Nowzari17Event ], researchers must think how to consider with the natural asynchronism introduced into the arrangement and how to rule out the Zeno behavior. Another challenge is that the interval principle cannot be used for consequence - triggered control systems anymore [ @CRamesh2011 ]. 

 Existing work have presented a large number of insights into general coordination of networked organization with event - triggered mechanisms. As a specific character study, event - triggered consensus is a longstanding area of inquiry in multi - agent systems; learn the references [ @Henningsson2008sporadic; @Astrom1999comparison; @PTabuada2007event; @Heemels2008analysis; @Heemels2012an; @RZheng2016stability; @BCheng2018fully; @BCheng2018consensus ]. Many survey papers about consequence - driven control were published, such as [ @Nowzari17Event; @lei - ding2018an; @xian - ming - zhang2017an; @xian - ming - zhang2016survey ]. Generally speaking, existing consensus protocol are designed for either state consensus of homogeneous networks or output consensus of heterogeneous networks. Noting that for heterogeneous networks, where even the dimensions of state may be different, output consensus is a more meaningful subject than department of state consensus. 

 In the sphere of state consensus of homogeneous networks, [ @Garcia2013decentralised; @Meng2013event; @DVDimarogonas2012distributed ] presented event - based protocols for single - integrator agentive role under undirected graphs. To remove the limitation that continuous information was even required in triggering functions of early works, [ @Seyboth2013event ] project triggering function only based on discrete sampled information. The authors of [ @DYang2016Decentralized; @Zhu2014event; @Guo2014a ] give event - driven consensus algorithms for cosmopolitan linear network. Reference [ @HZhang2014observer ] studied the event - drive consensus use output feedback control. The consequence - based consensus control problem with external disturbances was study in [ @LXing2017event; @JLiu2017fixed; @xiao - hua - ge2017event ]. Event - drive output consensus of heterogeneous networks was studied in [ @WHu2017output; @xdliu2017distributed ]. The authors of [ @WHu2017cooperative ] analyze event - base cooperative output regulation problem of heterogeneous network
ed dystems poses some new cmallenges that do not eeist in either xrea alone [@Nowzari17Event]. As plibted iut in [@Nowzari17Event], rerearchers must cobsidtr how to deal wivg the natural wsynehconism introducgd into the vystems and hof go rule out the Zeno behavior. Another challemgf is that the fepagaeion irlnciple cannot be used for event-friggertd control systems anymore [@CRamesh2011].

Existing wlrks have presented a parge numbet of unsights intu general bmordinatioh of networked systems with evevt-triygered mechqnusmd. As a specihic cafe study, evekn-triggesed conxensus is a lokgstaidint area of research in multi-agent systemf; see the rzferences [@Henningsson2008wpiradiw; @Asdrom1999zimpxriaoi; @PFabuadw2007evxnt; @Heemels2008znalysis; @Hewmels2012an; @RZheng2016stabikiej; @BCheng2018fully; @BChend2018cjnsensus]. Many survey papers about event-griben control were publisyed, such as [@Nowzari17Evgnt; @lei-dind2018an; @xian-ming-zhang2017an; @xian-ming-zhang2016survey]. Generally speaikng, ewistkbg consensus protocols are designed for either ffaue bonsensus of homoneneous networks ot luykut consensus uf hetzdofeneous networks. Nlting trat fir heterodenepus networks, where even the dimensions jd states may be diyferent, outpbt conxensux is a more meaningful copic fhan state fonsensus.

Jv the field of sgatv cotsensus of homogeneous netrorks, [@Garria2013deeentralired; @Keng2013evqnt; @DVDimagogonas2012distributed] presejted gvent-bdsed protofols for single-integrator agents under undirevtad craphs. Tj rempve the limitwtion that conjinuous iuformagion was snill requmred in trigdering functimjs of early xorks, [@Seyfoth2013wvenr] propordd triggering gunctions only basee on discrete sampked jnformation. The auuhirs of [@DYang2016Devengrajided; @Zrg2014event; @Guo2014a] [resdntdc evevt-driven coksevsus algorithms for genesal minear networks. Regevence [@HZhqng2014obserder] studied tne event-driven condensuv uring putkut feedback control. The event-bzsed consfnsms control prjblen with exterual disturbances was studied in [@LXing2017eveit; @JLiu2017fixed; @xiao-hua-ge2017gvent]. Event-driven outkut consensus pf heeerogeneogs networks was studued in [@WHu2017output; @wdliu2017distributed]. The ahthors of [@WJu2017cooperative] studied event-based cooperative output regulation problem of heterogeneous netsorkx
ed systems poses some new challenges that exist either area [@Nowzari17Event]. As pointed consider to deal with natural asynchronism introduced the systems and how to rule the Zeno behavior. Another challenge is that the separation principle cannot be used event-triggered control systems anymore [@CRamesh2011]. Existing works have presented a large number of into coordination networked with event-triggered mechanisms. As a specific case study, event-triggered consensus is a longstanding area of research multi-agent systems; see the references [@Henningsson2008sporadic; @Astrom1999comparison; @PTabuada2007event; @Heemels2012an; @RZheng2016stability; @BCheng2018fully; @BCheng2018consensus]. survey papers about event-driven control published, as [@Nowzari17Event; @xian-ming-zhang2017an; Generally existing consensus protocols designed for either state consensus of homogeneous networks or output consensus of heterogeneous networks. Noting that for networks, where dimensions of may different, consensus is a topic than state consensus. In the consensus of homogeneous networks, [@Garcia2013decentralised; @Meng2013event; @DVDimarogonas2012distributed] presented protocols for agents under undirected graphs. To remove limitation that continuous information was still required in functions of early works, [@Seyboth2013event] proposed triggering functions only based on discrete sampled information. The [@DYang2016Decentralized; @Zhu2014event; @Guo2014a] presented consensus algorithms for linear Reference studied event-driven consensus output feedback control. The event-based consensus control problem with external disturbances studied in [@LXing2017event; @JLiu2017fixed; @xiao-hua-ge2017event]. Event-driven output consensus of heterogeneous studied [@WHu2017output; @xdliu2017distributed]. The of [@WHu2017cooperative] studied event-based output problem of heterogeneous networks
ed systems poses some new chalLenges that Do not ExiSt iN eItheR areA alone [@Nowzari17EVEnt]. AS pointed out in [@Nowzari17EvEnt], reSeARcheRS mUst coNsider hOW tO DEal WiTh The NaTUrAl asyNchRonism iNtroduced iNto ThE systems and hOW tO rule out thE ZeNo behavior. AnOthEr chalLeNge IS that The SeparAtion pRInciplE cannot be UsED for evENt-triggEREd ContRol systems anymore [@craMEsh2011].

Existing worKs have PrESeNTEd a LarGe number of InSightS Into genERaL COOrdINation of netwoRked systems WIth Event-tRiGgeREd mechAnismS. AS A spEcific case sTudy, Event-trigGered cONsensus IS a longsTandinG arEa oF resEArCh In mUlTI-agENt SysTEms; See the reFeReNces [@HEnniNGSSOn2008spOraDic; @AStrom1999Comparison; @PTaBuaDa2007evENt; @HEemelS2008analYsis; @heEmels2012An; @RZheNg2016staBiLity; @BCheng2018fully; @bCheNg2018consensUs]. MAnY suRvEy papERs abouT evEnt-Driven cOntrol wERe pUbLISHeD, such as [@Nowzari17EvenT; @lEI-DiNg2018an; @xian-Ming-zhANg2017An; @XIan-ming-zHaNg2016sUrveY]. gEneraLly sPEaKing, exisTing coNSeNsUs protoCoLs are dEsIgnEd fOr eitHEr stAte conSensus of HomogENeous networks oR Output consensUS oF HEtERogeNeoUs networks. NOtinG That For hETeRogENeous NetwoRkS, WhERe even the dimensions Of States May be Different, outpUt consensuS IS A more meaNingFUl TOpic than state cOnsenSus.

In the fiELd of statE consEnsus of hOmogeneouS NEtworks, [@GArcIa2013dEceNtrALIsEd; @Meng2013event; @DVdIMaroGoNas2012distRibUted] preSenTed EveNt-bAsEd protocoLs for sinGlE-iNtEgRatOr ageNTs under uNdIreCtEd gRaphs. tO removE the lImitAtIoN ThaT continUOuS INforMaTiOn waS stIlL requIred IN trIggerinG functionS of EArly WoRkS, [@SeybotH2013event] proposeD tRiggering fUnCtiOns onlY BAsed on diScrete sampled informatioN. the authOrs Of [@DYaNg2016DeCentralizEd; @ZHu2014evenT; @GuO2014A] preseNted evEnt-drIvEn cONSensuS ALgOriThMs for generAL LinEar neTwOrks. referenCe [@HZhang2014observer] stUDieD the event-drivEn cOnseNSUs UsiNG oUTpuT fEEdbACK control. The evenT-based consEnSUs Control proBLem WiTh exterNal distUrbanCEs was stUdied in [@LXIng2017event; @JliU2017fixED; @XiaO-hua-ge2017evenT]. Event-drIven outpuT ConseNSuS of heTerOgeneoUs NetWorks Was stuDIed In [@WHu2017Output; @XdLiu2017disTribuTeD]. The authOrs of [@WHu2017cooperative] studIed eveNt-basEd cOoperativE ouTPut RegulatioN proBlem of heteRogEneOus neTwoRKs
ed systems poses some newchallenges  that  do  no texis t in  either area a l one[@Nowzari17Event]. Aspoint ed outi n[@Now zari17E v en t ] , r es ea rch er s  m ust c ons ider ho w to dealwit hthe naturala sy nchronismint roduced into  th e syst em s a n d how  to  rule  out t h e Zeno  behavior .A nother challen g e  i s th at the separation pr i nciple cannotbe use df or e ven t-t riggered c on trols ystemsa ny m o r e [ @ CRamesh2011]. 

Existingw ork s have  p res e nted a  larg en umb er of insig htsinto gene ral co o rdinati o n of ne tworke d s yst emsw it heve nt - tri g ge red mec hanisms.  A sa spe cifi c c a se s tud y, e vent- triggered con sen susi s a  long stand ingar ea of  resea rch i nmulti-agent sys tems ; see the  re fe ren ce s [@H e nnings son 200 8sporad ic; @As t rom 19 9 9 c om parison; @PTabuada 20 0 7 ev ent; @He emels2 0 08 an a lysis; @ He eme ls20 1 2 an; @ RZhe n g2 016stabi lity;@ BC he ng2018f ul ly; @B Ch eng 201 8cons e nsus ]. Man y survey  pape r s about event- d riven control we r e  p u blis hed , such as [ @Now z ari1 7Eve n t;  @l e i-din g2018 an ;  @ x ian-ming-zhang2017a n;  @xian -ming -zhang2016sur vey]. Gene r a l ly speak ing, ex i sting consensu s pro tocols are designed  foreither s tate cons e n sus of h omo gen eou s n e t wo rks or output c onse ns us of h ete rogeneo usnet wor ks.  N oting tha t for he te ro ge ne ous  netw o rks, whe re  ev en  th e dim e nsions  of s tate sma y  be  differ e nt , outp ut  c onse nsu sis amore mea ningful  topic th ans tate  c on sensus. 

In the fiel dof state c on sen sus of h omogeneo us networks, [@Garcia20 1 3decent ral ised;  @Me ng2013eve nt;  @DVDi mar o gonas2 012dis tribu te d]p r esent e d  e ven t- based prot o c ols  forsi ngle -integr ator agents underu ndi rected graphs . T o re m o ve  th e  l i mit at i ont h at continuous i nformation  w a sstill requ i red  i n trigg ering f uncti o ns of e arly work s, [@Seyb ot h201 3 e ven t] propose d trigge ring func t ionso nl y bas edon dis cr ete  samp led in f orm ation . Theau thorsof [@ DY ang2016D ecentralized; @Zhu2014e vent;@Guo2 014 a] presen ted eve nt-driven  con sensus alg ori thm s for  ge n eralline a rnet w orks.  Ref e rence [@H Z ha ng2 0 1 4o bserver] st u d i edthe e ven t -drive n co nsensus using out p ut feedback co ntro l .  Th e e v ent- ba sed consensuscon tr o l  problem  w ith externa l distur ba n ces w as stu died i n [@LXi n g 20 1 7event ; @J Liu 2017fixed ; @ xi a o-hua-g e2 01 7 event] . Ev en t-driv en out p ut c o n sensus of hetero geneo u s  netw o rks  wasst udied i n  [@W Hu2017outp ut; @xdliu2 017dis trib uted] . The a ut hors o f [ @W Hu2017coop e rative] s tudie d event -b ased  co operat iveo u tputregu la tio n problem o fh et er o gen eous  netw or ks
ed systems_poses some_new challenges that do_not exist_in_either area_alone_[@Nowzari17Event]. As pointed_out in [@Nowzari17Event],_researchers must consider how_to deal with_the_natural asynchronism introduced into the systems and how to rule out the Zeno behavior._Another_challenge is_that_the_separation principle cannot be used_for event-triggered control systems anymore_[@CRamesh2011].

Existing works_have presented a large number of insights into_general_coordination of networked_systems with event-triggered mechanisms. As a specific case study,_event-triggered consensus is a longstanding area_of research in_multi-agent_systems;_see the references [@Henningsson2008sporadic;_@Astrom1999comparison; @PTabuada2007event; @Heemels2008analysis; @Heemels2012an; @RZheng2016stability; @BCheng2018fully;_@BCheng2018consensus]. Many survey papers about event-driven_control were published, such as [@Nowzari17Event; @lei-ding2018an;_@xian-ming-zhang2017an; @xian-ming-zhang2016survey]. Generally speaking, existing consensus_protocols are designed for either_state consensus_of homogeneous networks or output_consensus of heterogeneous_networks. Noting_that for heterogeneous_networks, where even the dimensions of_states may be_different, output consensus is a more_meaningful_topic than state_consensus.

In_the_field of_state consensus of_homogeneous_networks, [@Garcia2013decentralised;_@Meng2013event;_@DVDimarogonas2012distributed] presented event-based protocols for single-integrator_agents_under undirected graphs. To remove the limitation_that continuous information was_still_required in triggering functions_of early works, [@Seyboth2013event] proposed_triggering functions only based on discrete_sampled information._The authors_of [@DYang2016Decentralized; @Zhu2014event; @Guo2014a] presented event-driven consensus algorithms for general linear_networks. Reference [@HZhang2014observer] studied the event-driven_consensus using output feedback_control. The_event-based_consensus control problem_with_external disturbances_was studied in [@LXing2017event; @JLiu2017fixed; @xiao-hua-ge2017event]. Event-driven_output consensus_of heterogeneous networks was studied in_[@WHu2017output; @xdliu2017distributed]. The authors_of_[@WHu2017cooperative] studied event-based cooperative output regulation_problem of heterogeneous networks