}\| \nonumber\\
&\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$ Thus the claim follows by combining and. Therefore the commutator condition $\eqref{equ2.16}$ is also verified with a uniform upper bound. Now the conclusion is followed by a step-by-step repetition of the proof in [@HSS].

Next, we consider applications to the fractional Laplacian. Let $H=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$ with domain the Sobolev space $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. It’s well-known that $\sigma(H)=\sigma_c(H)=[0,\,\infty)$. We have the following

\[cor2.10\] For $s\ge 1$, then estimates and are valid with $H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$.

We first observe that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ2.31}
[iH, A]=sH,\,\,\,\text{where}\,\,\, A=\frac12(x\cdot p+p\cdot x).\end{aligned}$$ For $b>a>0$, it then follows that $$\begin{aligned}
E_{[a, b]}i[H,\, A]E_{[a, b]}\ge as E_{[a, b]}\end{aligned}$$ Hence the Mourre’s inequality is satisfied.

We proceed to verify the commutator estimates with $g$ replaced by $g_k(\cdot)=g(\frac{\cdot}{2^k})$, $k=1,2,\ldots$. Similar to the proof in Corollary \[cor2.9\], it suffices to check the following $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ2.32}
\|[A,\, (H_R-z)^{-1}]\|\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1},\,\,\,\text{for any}\,\,\, R>0,\end{aligned}$$ which in turn follows by observing (note that $H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$) $$[A,\, (H-z)^{-1}]=is(H-z)^{-1}H(H-z)^{-1}.$$

We further point out that the estimate is also satisfied for $(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$, $s\ge 1$. Indeed, by interpolation, it suffices to prove $\alpha=1$. This follows
} \| \nonumber\\ 
 & \leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$ Thus the claim follows by combining and. consequently the commutator circumstance $ \eqref{equ2.16}$ is besides verified with a uniform upper bound. immediately the conclusion is followed by a footfall - by - footfall repetition of the validation in [ @HSS ]. 

 Next, we think applications to the fractional Laplacian. lease $ H=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$ with domain the Sobolev space $ H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. It ’s well - know that $ \sigma(H)=\sigma_c(H)=[0,\,\infty)$. We have the following 

 \[cor2.10\ ] For $ s\ge 1 $, then estimates and are valid with $ H = H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$. 

 We first observe that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{equ2.31 } 
 [ iH, A]=sH,\,\,\,\text{where}\,\,\, A=\frac12(x\cdot p+p\cdot x).\end{aligned}$$ For $ b > a>0 $, it then succeed that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 E_{[a, b]}i[H,\, A]E_{[a, b]}\ge as E_{[a, b]}\end{aligned}$$ Hence the Mourre ’s inequality is satisfied. 

 We continue to verify the commutator estimates with $ g$ replaced by $ g_k(\cdot)=g(\frac{\cdot}{2^k})$, $ k=1,2,\ldots$. alike to the proof in Corollary \[cor2.9\ ], it suffices to check the following $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{equ2.32 } 
 \|[A,\, (H_R - z)^{-1}]\|\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1},\,\,\,\text{for any}\,\,\, R>0,\end{aligned}$$ which in turn follow by observing (note that $ H = H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$) $ $ [ A,\, (H - z)^{-1}]=is(H - z)^{-1}H(H - z)^{-1}.$$ 

 We further point out that the estimate is besides quenched for $ (-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$, $ s\ge 1$. Indeed, by interjection, it suffices to prove $ \alpha=1$. This follows
}\| \nojumber\\
&\leq C|{\operatorname{Io}}z|^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$ Thos the cnaim fkllows bh combining and. Therefore thx conmutaujr condition $\eqref{dqu2.16}$ is aldo verifued xith a uniform u'ler boukb. Now bhe cmiclusion is folkowed by a step-by-step re[egicion of the proof in [@HSS].

Next, we consyder aplllcations to thg frabtyonam Laplacian. Let $H=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$ with dkmain tie Sobolev spacr $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. It’s well-known thah $\sigma(H)=\sigma_c(H)=[0,\,\infhy)$. We have jge sillowing

\[cor2.10\] Wor $s\ge 1$, then estimatea and are valid with $H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frxc{s}{2}}$.

We first obsgxce hvat $$\begin{almgned}
\lwbel{equ2.31}
[iH, A]=sM,\,\,\,\next{whese}\,\,\, A=\frav12(x\cdot p+p\cdot w).\end{anigbed}$$ For $b>a>0$, it then fonlows that $$\begin{alygned}
E_{[a, b]}h[H,\, A]E_{[a, b]}\ge as E_{[a, b]}\ebd{qligngd}$$ Hetce gye Ooudrx’s jnequapitb is satisfjed.

We procewd to verify the cokmtnstor estimatss witr $d$ replaced by $g_k(\cdot)=g(\frac{\cdot}{2^k})$, $k=1,2,\ldots$. Spmilzr to the proof in Coroolary \[cor2.9\], it suffices to check the following $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ2.32}
\|[A,\, (H_R-z)^{-1}]\|\leq C|{\operdtornemd{Im}}e|^{-1},\,\,\,\tcwt{fof ajy}\,\,\, R>0,\end{aligned}$$ which in turn follows by obserdjnb (kote that $H=H_R=(-\Delba)^{\frac{s}{2}}$) $$[A,\, (H-z)^{-1}]=is(H-z)^{-1}H(H-a)^{-1}.$$

Wf gorther point oot that ths estimate is also satisfyed fir $(-\Delta)^{\fwac{s}{2}}$, $s\ge 1$. Indeed, by interpolatiin, it sufficvs ti prove $\alpha=1$. This follows
}\| \nonumber\\ &\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$ Thus the claim combining Therefore the condition $\eqref{equ2.16}$ is upper Now the conclusion followed by a repetition of the proof in [@HSS]. we consider applications to the fractional Laplacian. Let $H=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$ with domain the Sobolev $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. It’s well-known that $\sigma(H)=\sigma_c(H)=[0,\,\infty)$. We have the following \[cor2.10\] For $s\ge 1$, estimates are with We first observe that $$\begin{aligned} \label{equ2.31} [iH, A]=sH,\,\,\,\text{where}\,\,\, A=\frac12(x\cdot p+p\cdot x).\end{aligned}$$ For $b>a>0$, it then follows $$\begin{aligned} E_{[a, b]}i[H,\, A]E_{[a, b]}\ge as E_{[a, b]}\end{aligned}$$ the Mourre’s inequality is We proceed to verify the estimates $g$ replaced $g_k(\cdot)=g(\frac{\cdot}{2^k})$, Similar the proof in \[cor2.9\], it suffices to check the following $$\begin{aligned} \label{equ2.32} \|[A,\, (H_R-z)^{-1}]\|\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1},\,\,\,\text{for any}\,\,\, R>0,\end{aligned}$$ which in turn by observing $H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$) $$[A,\, We point that the estimate satisfied for $(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$, $s\ge 1$. Indeed, suffices to prove $\alpha=1$. This follows
}\| \nonumber\\
&\leq C|{\operatorname{IM}}z|^{-1}.\end{alignEd}$$ ThuS thE clAiM folLows By combining and. tHereFore the commutator condiTion $\eQrEF{equ2.16}$ IS aLso veRified wITh A UNifOrM uPpeR bOUnD. Now tHe cOnclusiOn is followEd bY a Step-by-step rePEtItion of the ProOf in [@HSS].

Next, wE coNsider ApPliCAtionS to The frActionAL LaplaCian. Let $H=(-\DElTA)^{\frac{s}{2}}$ WIth domaIN ThE SobOlev space $H^{s}(\mathbb{r}^N)$. IT’S well-known that $\Sigma(H)=\SiGMa_C(h)=[0,\,\InfTy)$. WE have the foLlOwing

\[COr2.10\] For $s\gE 1$, ThEN EStiMAtes and are valId with $H=H_R=(-\DeLTa)^{\fRac{s}{2}}$.

We FiRst OBserve That $$\bEgIN{alIgned}
\label{eQu2.31}
[iH, a]=sH,\,\,\,\text{whEre}\,\,\, A=\frAC12(x\cdot p+P\Cdot x).\enD{alignEd}$$ FOr $b>A>0$, it tHEn FoLloWs THat $$\BEgIn{aLIgnEd}
E_{[a, b]}i[H,\, A]e_{[a, B]}\gE as E_{[a, B]}\end{ALIGNed}$$ HEncE the mourrE’s inequality iS saTisfIEd.

WE procEed to VeriFy The coMmutatOr estImAtes with $g$ replacEd by $G_k(\cdot)=g(\frAc{\cDoT}{2^k})$, $k=1,2,\LdOts$. SiMIlar to The ProOf in CorOllary \[cOR2.9\], it SuFFICeS to check the followiNg $$\BEGiN{aligned}
\Label{eQU2.32}
\|[A,\, (h_R-Z)^{-1}]\|\Leq C|{\operAtOrnAme{IM}}Z|^{-1},\,\,\,\Text{fOr anY}\,\,\, r>0,\eNd{aligneD}$$ which IN tUrN followS bY obserViNg (nOte That $H=h_r=(-\DelTa)^{\frac{S}{2}}$) $$[A,\, (H-z)^{-1}]=is(H-z)^{-1}h(H-z)^{-1}.$$

We FUrther point out THat the estimatE Is ALSo SAtisFieD for $(-\Delta)^{\frAc{s}{2}}$, $s\GE 1$. IndEed, bY InTerPOlatiOn, it sUfFIcES to prove $\alpha=1$. This foLlOws
}\| \nonumber\\
&\leq C|{\ operatorna me{Im }}z |^{ -1 }.\e nd{a ligned}$$ Thus theclaim follows by combi ningan d . Th e re forethe com m ut a t orco nd iti on $\ eqref {eq u2.16}$  is also v eri fi ed with a un i fo rm upper b oun d. Now the c onc lusion  i s f o llowe d b y a s tep-by - step r epetition  o f  the p r oof in[ @ HS S].
Next, we conside r  a p plications tothe fr ac t io n a l L apl acian. Let  $ H=(-\ D elta)^{ \ fr a c { s}{ 2 }}$ with doma in the Sobo l evspace$H ^{s } (\math bb{R} ^n ) $.It’s well-k nown  that $\s igma(H ) =\sigma _ c(H)=[0 ,\,\in fty )$.  Weh av ethe  f o llo w in g
\ [co r2.10\]Fo r$s\ge  1$, t h e n es tim ates  andare valid wit h $ H=H_ R =(- \Delt a)^{\ frac {s }{2}} $.

We  firs tobserve that $$ \beg in{aligne d}\l abe l{ equ2. 3 1}
[iH , A ]=s H,\,\,\ ,\text{ w her e} \ , \ ,\ , A=\frac12(x\cdot  p + p \c dot x).\ end{al i gn ed } $$ For $ b> a>0 $, i t thenfoll o ws  that $$ \begin { al ig ned}
E_ {[ a, b]} i[ H,\ , A ]E_{[ a , b] }\ge a s E_{[a,  b]}\ e nd{aligned}$$H ence the Mour r e’ s in e qual ity  is satisfi ed.We p roce e dtov erify  theco m mu t ator estimates with  $ g$ rep laced  by $g_k(\cdo t)=g(\frac { \ c dot}{2^k })$, $k = 1,2,\ldots$. S imila r to the p r oof in C oroll ary \[co r2.9\], i t suffices  to  ch eck  th e fo llowing $$\be g i n{al ig ned}
\l abe l{equ2. 32} 
\| [A, \,(H _R-z)^{-1 }]\|\leq  C |{ \o pe rat ornam e {Im}}z|^ {- 1}, \, \,\ ,\tex t {for a ny}\, \,\,  R >0 , \en d{align e d} $ $  whi ch  i n tu rnfo llows  byo bse rving ( note that  $H = H_R= (- \D elta)^{ \frac{s}{2}}$ )$$[A,\, (H -z )^{ -1}]=i s ( H-z)^{-1 }H(H-z)^{-1}.$$

We fur t her poi ntout t hatthe estim ate  is al sos atisfi ed for  $(-\ De lta ) ^ {\fra c { s} {2} }$ , $s\ge 1$ . Ind eed,by  int erpolat ion, it suffices t o  pr ove $\alpha=1 $.This f ol low s 
}\| \nonumber\\
&\leq_C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$ Thus_the claim follows by_combining and._Therefore_the commutator_condition_$\eqref{equ2.16}$ is also_verified with a_uniform upper bound. Now_the conclusion is_followed_by a step-by-step repetition of the proof in [@HSS].

Next, we consider applications to the_fractional_Laplacian. Let_$H=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$_with_domain the Sobolev space $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$._It’s well-known that $\sigma(H)=\sigma_c(H)=[0,\,\infty)$. We_have the_following

\[cor2.10\] For $s\ge 1$, then estimates and are_valid_with $H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$.

We first_observe that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ2.31}
[iH, A]=sH,\,\,\,\text{where}\,\,\, A=\frac12(x\cdot p+p\cdot x).\end{aligned}$$ For $b>a>0$,_it then follows that $$\begin{aligned}
E_{[a, b]}i[H,\,_A]E_{[a, b]}\ge as_E_{[a,_b]}\end{aligned}$$_Hence the Mourre’s inequality_is satisfied.

We proceed to verify the_commutator estimates with $g$ replaced by_$g_k(\cdot)=g(\frac{\cdot}{2^k})$, $k=1,2,\ldots$. Similar to the proof in_Corollary \[cor2.9\], it suffices to check_the following $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ2.32}
\|[A,\, (H_R-z)^{-1}]\|\leq C|{\operatorname{Im}}z|^{-1},\,\,\,\text{for_any}\,\,\, R>0,\end{aligned}$$_which in turn follows by_observing (note that_$H=H_R=(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$) $$[A,\,_(H-z)^{-1}]=is(H-z)^{-1}H(H-z)^{-1}.$$

We further point_out that the estimate is also_satisfied for $(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}$,_$s\ge 1$. Indeed, by interpolation, it_suffices_to prove $\alpha=1$._This_follows