-1}$, a rectangle $R$ of the following form:

-   if $d=1$, $R = [0,a_1u[ \cap \mathds{Z}$ with $a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}$;

-   if $d=2$, $R = ([0,a_1[u+[0,a_2]u^\perp) \cap \mathds{Z}^2$ with $a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}^2$, where $u^\perp$ is a vector orthogonal to $u$,

and a sequence of sites $(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq m}$ in $(a_1u+R) \cup (2a_1u+R)$ such that if the sites of $R$ are at zero and there are successive 0-clock rings at $x_1,x_2,\dots,x_m$ while there is no 1-clock ring in $R \cup \{x_1,\dots,x_m\}$, the sites of $a_1u+R$ are at zero afterwards.

For $d \geq 3$, we expect a similar proposition to hold, maybe with $R = [0,a_1[u + \bar{R}$, $\bar{R}$ contained in the hyperplane orthogonal to $u$, but we can not prove it because an equivalent of the construction of [@Bollobas_et_al2015] is not available yet. Proving such a construction would be enough to extend our result to any dimension.

We begin with the case $d=1$. Since $\mathcal{U}$ is supercritical there exists $u$ an unstable direction. Without loss of generality we can say that $u = 1$, therefore there exists an update rule $X$ contained in $-\mathds{N}^*$. This yields the mechanism illustrated by figure \[fig\_preuve\_prop\_Bollobas\](a): if $R = \{0,\dots,\ell\}$ is sufficiently large and full of zeroes, $(\ell+1)+X$ is full of zeroes, hence if the site $\ell+1$ receives a 0-clock ring, this clock ring puts it at zero. Then $(\ell+2)+X$ is full of zeroes, thus if $\ell+2$ receives a 0-clock ring, this clock ring puts it at zero.
-1}$, a rectangle $ R$ of the following form: 

 -    if $ d=1 $, $ R = [ 0,a_1u [ \cap \mathds{Z}$ with $ a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}$; 

 -    if $ d=2 $, $ R = ([ 0,a_1[u+[0,a_2]u^\perp) \cap \mathds{Z}^2 $ with $ a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}^2 $, where $ u^\perp$ is a vector orthogonal to $ u$, 

 and a succession of web site $ (x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq m}$ in $ (a_1u+R) \cup (2a_1u+R)$ such that if the sites of $ R$ are at zero and there are consecutive 0 - clock rings at $ x_1,x_2,\dots, x_m$ while there be no 1 - clock ring in $ R \cup \{x_1,\dots, x_m\}$, the sites of $ a_1u+R$ are at zero subsequently. 

 For $ five hundred \geq 3 $, we expect a alike proposition to hold, possibly with $ R = [ 0,a_1[u + \bar{R}$, $ \bar{R}$ contained in the hyperplane orthogonal to $ u$, but we cannot prove it because an equivalent of the structure of [ @Bollobas_et_al2015 ] is not available yet. Proving such a structure would be enough to prolong our consequence to any dimension. 

 We begin with the case $ d=1$. Since $ \mathcal{U}$ is supercritical there exist $ u$ an unstable direction. Without loss of generality we can state that $ u = 1 $, therefore there exists an update rule $ X$ contained in $ -\mathds{N}^*$. This give way the mechanism illustrated by figure \[fig\_preuve\_prop\_Bollobas\](a ): if $ R = \{0,\dots,\ell\}$ is sufficiently large and full of zero, $ (\ell+1)+X$ is full of zeroes, hence if the site $ \ell+1 $ receives a 0 - clock ring, this clock ring puts it at zero. Then $ (\ell+2)+X$ is full of zeroes, therefore if $ \ell+2 $ meet a 0 - clock ring, this clock band frame it at zero.
-1}$, a gectangle $R$ of the folloding form:

-   if $b=1$, $R = [0,a_1u[ \cap \mzthds{Z}$ wkth $a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}$;

-   if $d=2$, $R = ([0,a_1[y+[0,a_2]u^\peep) \cap \mathds{Z}^2$ with $a_1 j \in \mathfs{Z}^2$, wherw $u^\ptrp$ is a vector ocfhogonal to $u$,

zkd a vxquence of sitex $(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq m}$ in $(a_1u+R) \wuo (2c_1u+R)$ such that if the sites of $R$ are wt zero ajd there are soccesxyve 0-dlock rings at $x_1,x_2,\dots,x_m$ while thers is no 1-clock ring im $R \cup \{x_1,\dots,x_m\}$, the sites lf $a_1k+R$ are at zero aftfrwards.

For $e \gez 3$, we expect x similar krmposition jo hold, maybe with $R = [0,a_1[u + \bar{R}$, $\bxr{R}$ cpntained ib rhe vyperplane irthodonal to $u$, bmn we cat not ptove it becausc an xquicalent of the construrtion of [@Bollobas_et_aj2015] is not dvcilable yet. Proving sycy a cmnstsuctkin doumd bs enouhh vo extend ohr result ti any dimension.

We btgig with the cass $d=1$. Sigcq $\mathcal{U}$ is supercritical there existv $u$ an unstable direction. Qithout loss of generwlity we san say that $u = 1$, therefore there exists an update rule $B$ cinbainde ln $-\mathds{N}^*$. This yields the mechanism illustraesd bj figure \[fig\_preuvc\_prop\_Bollobas\](a): if $T = \{0,\dpjs,\ell\}$ is suffizientlv lzrge and full of zfroes, $(\ejl+1)+X$ iw full of zerpes, hence if the site $\ell+1$ rwceives a 0-cljxk ring, this clock ring puts nt at eero. Tnen $(\ell+2)+X$ is full of zerues, fhus if $\ell+2$ receives x 0-clock ring, thir ckowk ring kjts it at zero.
-1}$, a rectangle $R$ of the following if $R = \cap \mathds{Z}$ with if $R = ([0,a_1[u+[0,a_2]u^\perp) \mathds{Z}^2$ with $a_1 \in \mathds{Z}^2$, where $u^\perp$ is a orthogonal to $u$, and a sequence of sites $(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq m}$ $(a_1u+R) \cup (2a_1u+R)$ such that if the sites of $R$ are at zero there successive rings $x_1,x_2,\dots,x_m$ while there is no 1-clock ring in $R \cup \{x_1,\dots,x_m\}$, the sites of $a_1u+R$ are zero afterwards. For $d \geq 3$, we expect similar proposition to hold, with $R = [0,a_1[u + $\bar{R}$ in the orthogonal $u$, we can not it because an equivalent of the construction of [@Bollobas_et_al2015] is not available yet. Proving such a construction be enough our result any We with the case $\mathcal{U}$ is supercritical there exists $u$ Without loss of generality we can say that = 1$, there exists an update rule $X$ in $-\mathds{N}^*$. This yields the mechanism illustrated by \[fig\_preuve\_prop\_Bollobas\](a): if $R = \{0,\dots,\ell\}$ is sufficiently large and full of zeroes, $(\ell+1)+X$ is full hence if the site receives a 0-clock this ring it zero. Then is full of zeroes, thus if $\ell+2$ receives a 0-clock ring, clock ring puts it at zero.
-1}$, a rectangle $R$ of the following Form:

-   if $d=1$, $R = [0,a_1u[ \Cap \maThdS{Z}$ wItH $a_1 u \iN \matHds{Z}$;

-   if $d=2$, $R = ([0,a_1[u+[0,a_2]u^\peRP) \cap \Mathds{Z}^2$ with $a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}^2$, Where $U^\pERp$ is A VeCtor oRthogonAL tO $U$,

And A sEqUenCe OF sItes $(x_I)_{1 \leQ i \leq m}$ iN $(a_1u+R) \cup (2a_1u+R)$ SucH tHat if the siteS Of $r$ are at zero And There are succEssIve 0-cloCk RinGS at $x_1,x_2,\DotS,x_m$ whIle theRE is no 1-cLock ring iN $R \CUp \{x_1,\dotS,X_m\}$, the siTES oF $a_1u+R$ Are at zero afterwarDS.

FOR $d \geq 3$, we expect a SimilaR pROpOSItiOn tO hold, maybe WiTh $R = [0,a_1[u + \BAr{R}$, $\bar{R}$ COnTAINed IN the hyperplanE orthogonal TO $u$, bUt we caN nOt pROve it bEcausE aN EquIvalent of thE conStruction Of [@BollOBas_et_al2015] IS not avaIlable Yet. proVing SUcH a ConStRUctIOn WouLD be Enough to ExTeNd our ResuLT TO Any dImeNsioN.

We beGin with the casE $d=1$. SInce $\MAthCal{U}$ iS supeRcriTiCal thEre exiSts $u$ aN uNstable directioN. WitHout loss oF geNeRalItY we caN Say thaT $u = 1$, tHerEfore thEre exisTS an UpDATE rUle $X$ contained in $-\matHdS{n}^*$. thIs yields The mecHAnIsM IllustraTeD by FiguRE \[Fig\_prEuve\_PRoP\_BollobaS\](a): if $R = \{0,\dOTs,\ElL\}$ is suffIcIently LaRge And Full oF ZeroEs, $(\ell+1)+X$ Is full of ZeroeS, Hence if the site $\ELl+1$ receives a 0-clOCk RINg, THis cLocK ring puts it At zeRO. TheN $(\ell+2)+x$ Is FulL Of zerOes, thUs IF $\eLL+2$ receives a 0-clock ring, ThIs clocK ring Puts it at zero.
-1}$, a rectangle $R$ of t he followi ng fo rm: 

-   if$d=1 $, $R = [0,a_1 u [ \c ap \mathds{Z}$ with $a _1 u\i n  \ma t hd s{Z}$ ;

-  i f$ d =2$ ,$R  =([ 0 ,a _1[u+ [0, a_2]u^\ perp) \cap  \m at hds{Z}^2$ wi t h$a_1 u \in  \m athds{Z}^2$,  wh ere $u ^\ per p $ isa v ector  ortho g onal t o $u$,

a nd a sequ e nce ofs i te s $( x_i)_{1 \leq i \l e qm }$ in $(a_1u+R ) \cup  ( 2 a_ 1 u +R) $ s uch that i fthe s i tes of$ R$ a r e a t  zero and the re are succ e ssi ve 0-c lo ckr ings a t $x_ 1, x _2, \dots,x_m$whil e there i s no 1 - clock r i ng in $ R \cup  \{ x_1 ,\do t s, x_ m\} $, the si tes of$a_1u+R$  a re  at z eroa f t e rwar ds. 

Fo r $d\geq 3$, we e xpe ct a sim ilarpropo siti on  to h old, m aybewi th $R = [0,a_1[ u +\bar{R}$,  $\ ba r{R }$  cont a ined i n t hehyperpl ane ort h ogo na l t o$u$, but we can no tp r ov e it bec ause a n  e qu i valent o fthe  con s t ructi on o f  [ @Bolloba s_et_a l 20 15 ] is no tavaila bl e y et.  Prov i ng s uch aconstruc tionw ould be enough to extend our re s u lt to a nydimension.
Web egin  wit h  t hec ase $ d=1$.  S i nc e  $\mathcal{U}$ is s up ercrit icalthere exists$u$ an uns t a b le direc tion .  W i thout loss ofgener ality we c a n say th at $u  = 1$, t hereforet h ere exis tsanupd ate r ul e $X$ contain e d  in$- \mathds {N} ^*$. Th isyie lds  th emechanism  illustr at ed  b yfig ure \ [ fig\_pre uv e\_ pr op\ _Boll o bas\]( a): i f $R  =  \ { 0,\ dots,\e l l\ } $  issu ff icie ntl ylarge  and ful l of ze roes, $(\ ell + 1)+X $is  full o f zeroes, hen ce  if the si te  $\ ell+1$ r eceivesa 0-clock ring, this cl o ck ring  pu ts it  atzero. The n $ (\ell+ 2)+ X $ is f ull of  zero es , t h u s if$ \ el l+2 $receives a 0 -cl ock r in g, t his clo ck ring puts it at zer o.
-1}$, a_rectangle $R$_of the following form:

-_ _if_$d=1$, $R_=_[0,a_1u[ \cap \mathds{Z}$_with $a_1 u_\in \mathds{Z}$;

-  _if $d=2$, $R_=_([0,a_1[u+[0,a_2]u^\perp) \cap \mathds{Z}^2$ with $a_1 u \in \mathds{Z}^2$, where $u^\perp$ is a vector orthogonal_to_$u$,

and a_sequence_of_sites $(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq_m}$ in $(a_1u+R) \cup (2a_1u+R)$_such that_if the sites of $R$ are at zero_and_there are successive_0-clock rings at $x_1,x_2,\dots,x_m$ while there is no 1-clock_ring in $R \cup \{x_1,\dots,x_m\}$, the_sites of $a_1u+R$_are_at_zero afterwards.

For $d \geq_3$, we expect a similar proposition_to hold, maybe with $R =_[0,a_1[u + \bar{R}$, $\bar{R}$ contained in the_hyperplane orthogonal to $u$, but we_can not prove it because_an equivalent_of the construction of [@Bollobas_et_al2015]_is not available_yet. Proving_such a construction_would be enough to extend our_result to any_dimension.

We begin with the case $d=1$._Since_$\mathcal{U}$ is supercritical_there_exists_$u$ an_unstable direction. Without_loss_of generality_we_can say that $u = 1$,_therefore_there exists an update rule $X$ contained_in $-\mathds{N}^*$. This yields_the_mechanism illustrated by figure_\[fig\_preuve\_prop\_Bollobas\](a): if $R = \{0,\dots,\ell\}$_is sufficiently large and full of_zeroes, $(\ell+1)+X$_is full_of zeroes, hence if the site $\ell+1$ receives a 0-clock ring,_this clock ring puts it at_zero. Then $(\ell+2)+X$ is_full of_zeroes,_thus if $\ell+2$_receives_a 0-clock_ring, this clock ring puts it at_zero.