
M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Delta)- M^{\rm
schwarz}_\Delta(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm sol}+E_{\rm bind} \,\,\,,$$ so the binding energy is $$\label{be} E_{\rm bind}=M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)-M_{\rm sol}= -\left[
\int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta} r^2 {T}^{t}_{t} \d r -\int^{\infty}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \d r \right] \,\,\,,$$ where ${{T_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is the stress-energy tensor of the solitonic regular solution. This equation can be rewritten as, $$\label{be2} E_{\rm bind}= - \left[ \int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta} r^2
({T}^{t}_{t}- {{T_o}^{t}}_{t})\, \d r -\int^{r_\Delta}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t} \d r \right] \,\,\,.$$ Here we can identify the first term as the difference between the hair of the BH and the “hair" of the soliton. Of course we are comparing the quantities (the integrands) that live on different manifolds, but the total integral is well defined. What happens in the EYM case is that both stress tensors behave very much alike, for the exterior region ($r>r_\Delta$) and for large values of $r_\Delta$, and thus the only term that contributes is the second one, that gives the ADM mass of the soliton (recall that $r_\Delta
\gg 1$, that is for BH’s much larger than the characteristic size of the soliton (of order one in this dimension-less units), so the integral captures most of the soliton mass). In the scalar field case, the fact that the binding energy is proportional to $r_\Delta$, for large black holes, is captured by the fact that the BH contribution to the first term in (\[be2\]) is dominating. It would be interesting to explore this issue in other gravity-matter systems.

Instability and final state {#sec:5}
===========================

The next question we want to consider has to do with the following situation. Consider the case where a hairy black hole of geometrical radius $r_\Delta$
M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Delta)- M^{\rm 
 schwarz}_\Delta(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm sol}+E_{\rm bind } \,\,\,,$$ so the binding energy is $ $ \label{be } E_{\rm bind}=M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)-M_{\rm sol}= -\left [ 
 \int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta } r^2 { T}^{t}_{t } \d r -\int^{\infty}_{0 } r^2 
 { { T_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \d r \right ] \,\,\,,$$ where $ { { T_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is the tension - department of energy tensor of the solitonic even solution. This equation can be rewritten as, $ $ \label{be2 } E_{\rm bind}= - \left [ \int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta } r^2 
 ({ T}^{t}_{t}- { { T_o}^{t}}_{t})\, \d gas constant -\int^{r_\Delta}_{0 } r^2 
 { { T_o}^{t}}_{t } \d r \right ] \,\,\,.$$ Here we can identify the beginning terminus as the difference between the hair's-breadth of the BH and the “ hair " of the soliton. Of naturally we are comparing the quantities (the integrands) that live on different manifold, but the total integral is well defined. What happens in the EYM case is that both tension tensors behave very much alike, for the exterior area ($ r > r_\Delta$) and for large values of $ r_\Delta$, and thus the only condition that contributes is the second one, that gives the ADM mass of the soliton (recall that $ r_\Delta 
 \gg 1 $, that is for BH ’s much large than the characteristic size of the soliton (of order one in this dimension - less units), so the integral captures most of the soliton mass). In the scalar field case, the fact that the binding energy is proportional to $ r_\Delta$, for large black holes, is captured by the fact that the BH contribution to the first term in (\[be2\ ]) is dominating. It would be interesting to research this topic in other graveness - topic systems. 

 Instability and final state { # sec:5 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The next doubt we want to consider has to do with the follow situation. Consider the case where a hairy black hole of geometrical spoke $ r_\Delta$

M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Deltx)- M^{\rm
schwarz}_\Delja(e_\Delta)= M_{\rm skl}+E_{\rm bivd} \,\,\,,$$ so the binding energy is $$\lqbel{bt} E_{\rm bind}=M_{\rm hair}(r_\Aelta)-M_{\rm dol}= -\left[
\unt^{\iifty}_{r_\Delta} r^2 {T}^{t}_{t} \d r -\int^{\lufty}_{0} d^2
{{B_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \b c \right] \,\,\,,$$ where ${{J_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is the vtress-energy tanrox of the solitonic regular solution. Ehis eqiahion can be rerrituen as, $$\mabel{be2} E_{\rm bind}= - \left[ \int^{\infty}_{r_\Demta} r^2
({T}^{t}_{u}- {{T_o}^{t}}_{t})\, \d r -\int^{r_\Delya}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t} \d r \right] \,\,\,.$$ Here wf caj identify the firdt term as jge qufference begween the hair of the GH and the “hair" of the soliton. Uf cobrse we are cimpwting the quaititief (the integrands) thad live pn different msniholdw, but the total integcal is well defined. Rhat happana in the EYM case iw thaj botv stfwss tehspra behage tery much amike, for thw exterior region ($r>t_\Dqota$) and for lzrge vwltes of $r_\Delta$, and thus the only term thdt dontributes is the secobd one, that gives the ADM mass of the soliton (recall that $r_\Delta
\gg 1$, that is for BH’s jjch lwfteg than the characteristic size of the soliton (kf ogder one in this bimension-less unotd), xj the integrau captbdea most of the solihon masf). In rhe scalaw firld case, the fact that the vinding eneryy us proportional to $r_\Delta$, for larbe blsck holes, is captured bv the ract that tje BH conffibution to the wirxt term in (\[be2\]) is dominating. Yt would ue incerestine to explowe this isdue ik other gravity-mattfr sydtams.

Instabipity and final state {#sec:5}
===========================

The nexv question we wdnt to consnder hss to do with the following situatnon. Covsider the case wiere a hairy black hole ox geometrical radius $w_\Delra$
M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Delta)- M^{\rm schwarz}_\Delta(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm \,\,\,,$$ the binding is $$\label{be} E_{\rm r^2 \d r -\int^{\infty}_{0} {{T_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \d r \,\,\,,$$ where ${{T_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is the stress-energy of the solitonic regular solution. This equation can be rewritten as, $$\label{be2} E_{\rm - \left[ \int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta} r^2 ({T}^{t}_{t}- {{T_o}^{t}}_{t})\, \d r -\int^{r_\Delta}_{0} r^2 {{T_o}^{t}}_{t} \d r \,\,\,.$$ we identify first term as the difference between the hair of the BH and the “hair" of the Of course we are comparing the quantities (the that live on different but the total integral is defined. happens in EYM is both stress tensors very much alike, for the exterior region ($r>r_\Delta$) and for large values of $r_\Delta$, and thus the term that the second that the mass of the that $r_\Delta \gg 1$, that is larger than the characteristic size of the soliton order one this dimension-less units), so the integral most of the soliton mass). In the scalar case, the fact that the binding energy is proportional to $r_\Delta$, for large black holes, by the fact that BH contribution to first in is It would interesting to explore this issue in other gravity-matter systems. Instability and state {#sec:5} =========================== The next question we want to consider do the following situation. the case where a black of geometrical radius $r_\Delta$

M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Delta)- m^{\rm
schwarz}_\delta(R_\DeLta)= m_{\rM sol}+e_{\rm bInd} \,\,\,,$$ so the bindinG EnerGy is $$\label{be} E_{\rm bind}=M_{\rm hAir}(r_\DElTA)-M_{\rm SOl}= -\Left[
\iNt^{\infty}_{R_\deLTA} r^2 {T}^{T}_{t} \D r -\Int^{\InFTy}_{0} R^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \D r \rIght] \,\,\,,$$ wheRe ${{T_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is thE stReSs-energy tensOR oF the solitoNic Regular solutIon. this eqUaTioN Can be RewRitteN as, $$\labEL{be2} E_{\rm Bind}= - \left[ \iNt^{\INfty}_{r_\DELta} r^2
({T}^{t}_{t}- {{t_O}^{T}}_{t})\, \D r -\inT^{r_\Delta}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t} \d r \rigHT] \,\,\,.$$ HERe we can identifY the fiRsT TeRM As tHe dIfference bEtWeen tHE hair of THe bh ANd tHE “hair" of the solIton. Of coursE We aRe compArIng THe quanTitieS (tHE inTegrands) thaT livE on differEnt manIFolds, buT The totaL integRal Is wEll dEFiNeD. WhAt HAppENs In tHE EYm case is tHaT bOth stRess TENSOrs bEhaVe veRy mucH alike, for the eXteRior REgiOn ($r>r_\DElta$) aNd foR lArge vAlues oF $r_\DelTa$, And thus the only tErm tHat contriButEs Is tHe SeconD One, thaT giVes The ADM mAss of thE SolItON (REcAll that $r_\Delta
\gg 1$, thaT iS FOr bH’s much lArger tHAn ThE CharacteRiStiC sizE OF the sOlitON (oF order onE in thiS DiMeNsion-leSs Units), sO tHe iNteGral cAPturEs most Of the solIton mASs). In the scalar fIEld case, the facT ThAT ThE BindIng Energy is proPortIOnal To $r_\DELtA$, foR Large Black HoLEs, IS captured by the fact tHaT the BH ContrIbution to the fIrst term in (\[BE2\]) IS dominatIng. IT WoULd be interestinG to exPlore this iSSue in othEr graVity-mattEr systems.

iNStabilitY anD fiNal StaTE {#SeC:5}
===========================

The next questION we wAnT to consIdeR has to dO wiTh tHe fOllOwIng situatIon. ConsiDeR tHe CaSe wHere a HAiry blacK hOle Of GeoMetriCAl radiUs $r_\DeLta$

M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)= M _{\rm ADM} (r_\D elt a)-  M ^{\r m
sc hwarz}_\Delta( r _\De lta)= M_{\rm sol}+E_{\ rm bi nd }  \,\ , \, ,$$ s o the b i nd i n g e ne rg y i s$ $\ label {be } E_{\r m bind}=M_ {\r mhair}(r_\Del t a) -M_{\rm so l}=  -\left[
\in t^{ \infty }_ {r_ \ Delta } r ^2 {T }^{t}_ { t} \dr -\int^{ \i n fty}_{ 0 } r^2
{ { T _o }^{t }}_{t}\, \d r \ri g ht ]  \,\,\,,$$ whe re ${{ T_ o }^ { t }}_ {t} $ is the s tr ess-e n ergy te n so r o f t h e solitonic r egular solu t ion . This  e qua t ion ca n bere w rit ten as, $$\ labe l{be2} E_ {\rm b i nd}= -\ left[ \ int^{\ inf ty} _{r_ \ De lt a}r^ 2 
({ T }^ {t} _ {t} - {{T_o} ^{ t} }_{t} )\,\ d r  -\i nt^ {r_\ Delta }_{0} r^2
{{T _o} ^{t} } _{t } \dr \ri ght]  \ ,\,\, .$$ He re we  c an identify the  fir st term a s t he  di ff erenc e  betwe enthe  hair o f the B H  an dt h e  “ hair" of the solit on . Of  coursewe are co mp a ring the  q uan titi e s  (the  int e gr ands) th at liv e  o ndiffere nt  manif ol ds,  bu t the tota l inte gral iswelld efined. What h a ppens in theE YM c as e  istha t both stre ss t e nsor s be h av e v e ry mu ch al ik e ,f or the exterior reg io n ($r> r_\De lta$) and for  large val u e s  of $r_\ Delt a $, and thus the o nly t erm that c o ntribute s isthe seco nd one, t h a t givesthe  AD M m ass o fthe soliton ( r e call  t hat $r_ \De lta
\gg  1$ , t hat  is  f or BH’s m uch larg er  t ha nthe  char a cteristi csiz eofthe s o liton(of o rder  o ne inthis di m en s i on-l es sunit s),  s o the  int e gra l captu res mostoft he s ol it on mass ). In the sca la r field ca se , t he fac t that the  binding energy is prop o rtional  to  $r_\ Delt a$, for l arg e blac k h o les, i s capt uredby  th e factt h at  th eBH contrib u t ion  to t he  fir st term  in (\[be2\]) is d o min ating. It wou ldbe i n t er est i ng toex p lor e this issue in o ther gravi ty - ma tter syste m s.
I nstabil ity and  fina l  state{#sec:5}========= == ==== = = === =======

T he nextquestionw e wan t  t o con sid er has  t o d o wit h thef oll owing  situa ti on. Co nside rthe case  where a hairy black ho le ofgeome tri cal radiu s $ r _\D elta$

M_{\rm hair}(r_\Delta)=_M_{\rm ADM}(r_\Delta)-_M^{\rm
schwarz}_\Delta(r_\Delta)= M_{\rm sol}+E_{\rm bind}_\,\,\,,$$ so_the_binding energy_is_$$\label{be} E_{\rm bind}=M_{\rm_hair}(r_\Delta)-M_{\rm sol}= -\left[
\int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta}_r^2 {T}^{t}_{t} \d r_-\int^{\infty}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t}\, \d_r_\right] \,\,\,,$$ where ${{T_o}^{t}}_{t}$ is the stress-energy tensor of the solitonic regular solution. This_equation_can be_rewritten_as,_$$\label{be2} E_{\rm bind}= - \left[_\int^{\infty}_{r_\Delta} r^2
({T}^{t}_{t}- {{T_o}^{t}}_{t})\, \d r_-\int^{r_\Delta}_{0} r^2
{{T_o}^{t}}_{t}_\d r \right] \,\,\,.$$ Here we can identify_the_first term as_the difference between the hair of the BH and_the “hair" of the soliton. Of_course we are_comparing_the_quantities (the integrands) that_live on different manifolds, but the_total integral is well defined. What_happens in the EYM case is that_both stress tensors behave very much_alike, for the exterior region_($r>r_\Delta$) and_for large values of $r_\Delta$,_and thus the_only term_that contributes is_the second one, that gives the_ADM mass of_the soliton (recall that $r_\Delta
\gg 1$,_that_is for BH’s_much_larger_than the_characteristic size of_the_soliton (of_order_one in this dimension-less units), so_the_integral captures most of the soliton mass)._In the scalar field_case,_the fact that the_binding energy is proportional to_$r_\Delta$, for large black holes, is_captured by_the fact_that the BH contribution to the first term in (\[be2\]) is_dominating. It would be interesting to_explore this issue in_other gravity-matter_systems.

Instability_and final state_{#sec:5}
===========================

The_next question_we want to consider has to do_with the_following situation. Consider the case where_a hairy black hole_of_geometrical radius $r_\Delta$