_\approx).$$

Every valuation $\vl$ in $L$ can be viewed as a valuation $\theta$ in the frame $\frF=(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$, and vice versa. By induction on $\mvf$, for every $\stA$ in $\clC$ we have $
\stA\mo{ \| \mvf \|}\tiff
(\frF,\theta){,}\Th(\stA)\mo\mvf.
$ Thus $\MTh(\clC,\clR)=\MLog(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$.

The second equality immediately follows from Theorem \[thm:minmax-ths\].

\[prop: finite frame\] If $\Ths$ is finite, then $\mathrm{MTh}(\mathcal C,\mathcal R)$ is the logic of the Kripke frame $(\Ths,\clR_{\Ths})$.

In this case $\clA=\clP(\Ths)$.

The family $\Ths$ of complete theories can be viewed as the quotient of $\clC$ by the $L$-equivalence $\equiv$ where $\stA\equiv \stB$ iff $\Th(\stA)=\Th(\stB)$. Theorem \[thm:maintoolnew\] can be generalized for the case of any equivalence $\sim$ on $\clC$ finer than $\equiv$; in particular, it holds for the isomorphism equivalence $\isom$ on models, or for the equivalence in a stronger model-theoretic language. Namely, we let: $$\begin{aligned}
\,[\stA]_\sim\clR_\sim[\stB]_\sim
&\,\Iff\,&
\exists\,\mathfrak A'\sim\mathfrak A\;
\exists\,\mathfrak B'\sim\mathfrak B\;\,
\mathfrak A'\,\mathcal R\,\mathfrak B',
\\
\,[\stA]_\sim\Rsimmax[\stB]_\sim
&\Iff&
\forall\,\varphi\in L_s\;\,
(\mathfrak B\vDash\varphi\,\Rightarrow\,
\mathfrak A\vDash f(\varphi));\end{aligned}$$ the algebra of valuations is defined as the collection $\clV_\sim$ “consisting” of classes $\clC_\psi/{\sim}$ for $\psi\in L_s$.
_ \approx).$$ 

 Every valuation $ \vl$ in $ L$ can be viewed as a   valuation   $ \theta$ in the frame $ \frF=(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$, and frailty versa. By evocation on   $ \mvf$, for every $ \stA$ in   $ \clC$ we have $ 
 \stA\mo { \| \mvf \|}\tiff 
 (\frF,\theta){,}\Th(\stA)\mo\mvf. 
 $ Thus $ \MTh(\clC,\clR)=\MLog(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$. 

 The second equality immediately follow from Theorem   \[thm: minmax - ths\ ]. 

 \[prop: finite frame\ ] If $ \Ths$ is finite, then $ \mathrm{MTh}(\mathcal C,\mathcal R)$ is the logic of the Kripke inning $ (\Ths,\clR_{\Ths})$. 

 In this case $ \clA=\clP(\Ths)$. 

 The family $ \Ths$ of arrant hypothesis can be viewed as the quotient of $ \clC$ by the $ L$-equivalence   $ \equiv$ where $ \stA\equiv \stB$ iff $ \Th(\stA)=\Th(\stB)$. Theorem   \[thm: maintoolnew\ ] can be generalized for the case of any equivalence   $ \sim$ on   $ \clC$ fine than   $ \equiv$; in particular, it holds for the isomorphism comparison $ \isom$ on model, or for the equivalence in a   stronger model - theoretic language. Namely, we permit: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \,[\stA]_\sim\clR_\sim[\stB]_\sim 
 & \,\Iff\, & 
 \exists\,\mathfrak A'\sim\mathfrak A\; 
 \exists\,\mathfrak B'\sim\mathfrak B\;\, 
 \mathfrak A'\,\mathcal R\,\mathfrak B', 
 \\ 
 \,[\stA]_\sim\Rsimmax[\stB]_\sim 
 & \Iff & 
 \forall\,\varphi\in L_s\;\, 
 (\mathfrak B\vDash\varphi\,\Rightarrow\, 
 \mathfrak A\vDash f(\varphi));\end{aligned}$$ the algebra of valuations is defined as the collection   $ \clV_\sim$ “ consist ” of classes   $ \clC_\psi/{\sim}$ for $ \psi\in L_s$.
_\appgox).$$

Every valuation $\vl$ in $L$ can be vieweb as a veluatioh $\theta$ iv the frame $\frF=(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$, aid vuce vtgsa. By induction on $\mvw$, for evegy $\stA$ in $\xlC$ xe have $
\stA\mo{ \| \mtr \|}\tiff
(\fvY,\thetz){,}\Bh(\stA)\ki\mvf.
$ Thus $\MTh(\ckC,\clR)=\MLog(\Tvs,\filtR,\clA)$.

The vezoud equality immediately follows from Theorek \[tjm:minmax-ths\].

\[prok: finptq frzme\] If $\Ths$ is finite, then $\mathrm{MTg}(\mathcan C,\mathcal R)$ os the logic of the Kripke frale $(\Ths,\clR_{\Ths})$.

In thid case $\clA=\coP(\Thf)$.

Rhe family $\Tfs$ of complete theoriea can be viewed as the quotient of $\ckC$ by the $O$-ewuigdlence $\equiv$ wherv $\stA\equiv \stN$ iff $\Tv(\stA)=\Th(\syB)$. Theorem \[thm:msinvoolbew\] can be generalizev for the case of ani equivaletcz $\sim$ on $\clC$ finer than $\wqyiv$; it pasticjoar, it hplss for thx isomorphiam equivalebce $\isom$ on models, pr dor the equivzlence ig a stronger model-theoretic language. Namtly, ws let: $$\begin{aligned}
\,[\stA]_\sin\clR_\sim[\stB]_\sim
&\,\Iff\,&
\existd\,\mathfrak A'\sim\mathfrak A\;
\exists\,\mathfrak B'\sim\mathfrak B\;\,
\mathfsak A'\,\jxtheql R\,\mxrhvrak B',
\\
\,[\stA]_\sim\Rsimmax[\stB]_\sim
&\Iff&
\forall\,\varphi\in L_s\;\,
(\iztnfgak B\vDash\varphi\,\Rlghtarrow\,
\mathfrak S\vFaxr f(\varphi));\end{auigned}$$ ths algebra of valuahions if defuned as tre cpllection $\clV_\sim$ “consisting” if classes $\clB_\psi/{\wim}$ for $\psi\in L_s$.
_\approx).$$ Every valuation $\vl$ in $L$ can as valuation $\theta$ the frame $\frF=(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$, on for every $\stA$ $\clC$ we have \stA\mo{ \| \mvf \|}\tiff (\frF,\theta){,}\Th(\stA)\mo\mvf. $ $\MTh(\clC,\clR)=\MLog(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$. The second equality immediately follows from Theorem \[thm:minmax-ths\]. \[prop: finite frame\] If is finite, then $\mathrm{MTh}(\mathcal C,\mathcal R)$ is the logic of the Kripke frame In case The $\Ths$ of complete theories can be viewed as the quotient of $\clC$ by the $L$-equivalence $\equiv$ $\stA\equiv \stB$ iff $\Th(\stA)=\Th(\stB)$. Theorem \[thm:maintoolnew\] can be for the case of equivalence $\sim$ on $\clC$ finer $\equiv$; particular, it for isomorphism $\isom$ on models, for the equivalence in a stronger model-theoretic language. Namely, we let: $$\begin{aligned} \,[\stA]_\sim\clR_\sim[\stB]_\sim &\,\Iff\,& \exists\,\mathfrak A'\sim\mathfrak A\; B'\sim\mathfrak B\;\, R\,\mathfrak B', \,[\stA]_\sim\Rsimmax[\stB]_\sim \forall\,\varphi\in (\mathfrak B\vDash\varphi\,\Rightarrow\, \mathfrak the algebra of valuations is defined $\clV_\sim$ “consisting” of classes $\clC_\psi/{\sim}$ for $\psi\in L_s$.
_\approx).$$

Every valuation $\vl$ in $L$ Can be vieweD as a vAluAtiOn $\ThetA$ in tHe frame $\frF=(\Ths,\fILtR,\cLA)$, and vice versa. By inductIon on $\MvF$, For eVErY $\stA$ iN $\clC$ we hAVe $
\STa\mo{ \| \MvF \|}\tIff
(\Frf,\ThEta){,}\Th(\StA)\Mo\mvf.
$ ThUs $\MTh(\clC,\clr)=\MLOg(\ths,\filtR,\clA)$.

THE sEcond equalIty Immediately fOllOws froM THeoREm \[thm:MinMax-thS\].

\[prop: fINite frAme\] If $\Ths$ iS fINite, thEN $\mathrm{mtH}(\mAthcAl C,\mathcal R)$ is the lOGiC Of the Kripke fraMe $(\Ths,\cLR_{\tHs})$.

iN ThiS caSe $\clA=\clP(\ThS)$.

THe famILy $\Ths$ of COmPLETe tHEories can be viEwed as the quOTieNt of $\clc$ bY thE $l$-equivAlencE $\eQUiv$ Where $\stA\equIv \stb$ iff $\Th(\stA)=\th(\stB)$. THEorem \[thM:MaintooLnew\] caN be GenEralIZeD fOr tHe CAse OF aNy eQUivAlence $\siM$ oN $\cLC$ finEr thAN $\EQUiv$; iN paRticUlar, iT holds for the iSomOrphISm eQuivaLence $\Isom$ On ModelS, or for The eqUiValence in a stronGer mOdel-theorEtiC lAngUaGe. NamELy, we leT: $$\beGin{Aligned}
\,[\StA]_\sim\cLr_\siM[\sTb]_\SIm
&\,\iff\,&
\exists\,\mathfrak A'\SiM\MAtHfrak A\;
\exIsts\,\maTHfRaK b'\sim\mathFrAk B\;\,
\MathFRAk A'\,\maThcaL r\,\mAthfrak B',
\\
\,[\StA]_\sim\rSiMmAx[\stB]_\siM
&\IFf&
\foraLl\,\VarPhi\In L_s\;\,
(\mAThfrAk B\vDaSh\varphi\,\rightARrow\,
\mathfrak A\vdAsh f(\varphi));\end{ALiGNEd}$$ THe alGebRa of valuatiOns iS DefiNed aS ThE coLLectiOn $\clV_\SiM$ “CoNSisting” of classes $\clC_\PsI/{\sim}$ foR $\psi\iN L_s$.
_\approx).$$

Every valuat ion $\vl$in $L $ c anbe  vie wedas a valuation $\th eta$ in the frame $\fr F=(\T hs , \fil t R, \clA) $, andv ic e ver sa .Byin d uc tionon$\mvf$,  for every  $\ st A$ in $\clC$ we  have $
\s tA\ mo{ \| \mvf\|} \tiff(\ frF , \thet a){ ,}\Th (\stA) \ mo\mvf .
$ Thus$\ M Th(\cl C ,\clR)= \ M Lo g(\T hs,\filtR,\clA)$. 
T h e second equal ity im me d ia t e lyfol lows fromTh eorem \[thm:m i nm a x - ths \ ].

\[prop: f inite frame \ ] I f $\Th s$  is finite , the n$ \ma thrm{MTh}(\ math cal C,\ma thcalR )$ is t h e logic  of th e K rip ke f r am e$(\ Th s ,\c l R_ {\T h s}) $.

In t hi scase$\cl A = \ c lP(\ Ths )$.
Thefamily $\Ths$  of  com p let e the ories  can  b e vie wed as  thequ otient of $\clC $ by  the $L$- equ iv ale nc e $\e q uiv$ w her e $ \stA\eq uiv \st B $ i ff $ \ Th (\stA)=\Th(\stB)$.  T h e or em \[thm :maint o ol ne w \] can b egen eral i z ed fo r th e  c ase of a ny equ i va le nce $\s im $ on $ \c lC$  fi ner t h an $ \equiv $; in pa rticu l ar, it holds f o r the isomorp h is m eq u ival enc e $\isom$ o n mo d els,  orf or  th e  equi valen ce in a stronger model-th eo reticlangu age. Namely,we let: $$ \ b e gin{alig ned} \, [ \stA]_\sim\clR _\sim [\stB]_\si m 
&\,\Iff \,&
\ exists\, \mathfrak A '\sim\ma thf rak  A\ ;
\ e x is ts\,\mathfrak B '\si m\ mathfra k B \;\,
\m ath fra k A '\, \m athcal R\ ,\mathfr ak  B ', 
\ \
\ ,[\st A ]_\sim\R si mma x[ \st B]_\s i m
&\If f&
\f oral l\ ,\ v arp hi\in L _ s\ ; \ ,
(\ ma th frak  B\ vD ash\v arph i \,\ Rightar row\,
\ma thf r ak A \v Da sh f(\v arphi));\end{ al igned}$$ t he  al gebrao f  valuati ons is defined as the c o llectio n $ \clV_ \sim $ “consis tin g” ofcla s ses $\ clC_\p si/{\ si m}$ f or $\ p s i\ inL_ s$.
_\approx).$$

Every valuation_$\vl$ in_$L$ can be viewed_as a valuation $\theta$_in_the frame_$\frF=(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$,_and vice versa._By induction on $\mvf$,_for every $\stA$ in $\clC$_we have $
\stA\mo{_\|_\mvf \|}\tiff
(\frF,\theta){,}\Th(\stA)\mo\mvf.
$ Thus $\MTh(\clC,\clR)=\MLog(\Ths,\filtR,\clA)$.

The second equality immediately follows from Theorem \[thm:minmax-ths\].

\[prop: finite frame\] If $\Ths$_is_finite, then_$\mathrm{MTh}(\mathcal_C,\mathcal_R)$ is the logic of_the Kripke frame $(\Ths,\clR_{\Ths})$.

In this_case $\clA=\clP(\Ths)$.

The_family $\Ths$ of complete theories can be viewed_as_the quotient of_$\clC$ by the $L$-equivalence $\equiv$ where $\stA\equiv \stB$ iff $\Th(\stA)=\Th(\stB)$._Theorem \[thm:maintoolnew\] can be generalized for the_case of any_equivalence $\sim$_on $\clC$_finer than $\equiv$; in particular,_it holds for the isomorphism equivalence_$\isom$ on models, or for the_equivalence in a stronger model-theoretic language. Namely, we_let: $$\begin{aligned}
\,[\stA]_\sim\clR_\sim[\stB]_\sim
&\,\Iff\,&
\exists\,\mathfrak A'\sim\mathfrak A\;
\exists\,\mathfrak B'\sim\mathfrak B\;\,
\mathfrak_A'\,\mathcal R\,\mathfrak B',
\\
\,[\stA]_\sim\Rsimmax[\stB]_\sim
&\Iff&
\forall\,\varphi\in L_s\;\,
(\mathfrak B\vDash\varphi\,\Rightarrow\,
\mathfrak_A\vDash f(\varphi));\end{aligned}$$_the algebra of valuations is_defined as the_collection $\clV_\sim$ “consisting”_of classes $\clC_\psi/{\sim}$ for_$\psi\in L_s$.