 threshold, then we can write down a simple expression for the threshold. This is shown in equation (\[fdeq\]), which is valid for planets around Sun-like stars with $F_{\mathrm{p}}< 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$. The 500 $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ cut excludes highly irradiated rocky planets like Kepler-10b and CoRoT-7b. These planets may have once had volatiles in the past, but they are likely rocky today and so H/He mass loss is no longer relevant. This cut also excludes the region where energy-limited escape breaks down and mass loss becomes radiation and recombination limited [Murray-Clay2009]{}

$$\label{fdeq}
\rho M_{\mathrm{p}} \ge \frac{ 3\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}} } { 4 G } \frac{ F_{\mathrm{p}} } { F_{\mathrm{\oplus}} } t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}$$

The exciting implication of equation (\[fdeq\]) is that we can use it to obtain lower limits on mass for the much larger population of *Kepler* super-Earths and sub-Neptunes for which we do not have measured densities. This will help identify promising targets for follow-up work with radial velocity observations. This is shown in equation (\[masslimeq\]).

$$\label{masslimeq}
M_{\mathrm{p}} \ge \sqrt{ \frac{\pi\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}}}{G} \frac{F_{\mathrm{p}}}{F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}} t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}} \, R_{\mathrm{p}}^{3/2}$$

Table \[masslimtab\] applies equation (\[masslimeq\]) to a list of *Kepler* candidates smaller than 4 $R_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ that are well suited to radial-velocity follow-up. We excluded any planets with $F_{\mathrm{p}}> 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, since equation (\[masslimeq\]) is not valid in that regime. Also, we limited the sample to only those planets with minimum radial velocity semi-amplitudes $K_{\mathrm{min}}>1.0 \: \mathrm{m \, s^{-1}}$ around stars with Kepler magnitude brighter than 13, since these will be the most promising for RV follow-up. In the end, this leaves
threshold, then we can write down a simple expression for the brink. This is usher in equation (\[fdeq\ ]), which is valid for planets around Sun - like ace with $ F_{\mathrm{p } } < 500 $ $ F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$. The 500 $ F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ cut excludes highly irradiated rocky planet like Kepler-10b and CoRoT-7b. These planets may have once had volatile in the past, but they are probably rocky today and so H / He aggregate loss is no longer relevant. This cut besides excludes the region where energy - limited escape breaks down and mass personnel casualty becomes radiation and recombination limited [ Murray - Clay2009 ] { } 

 $ $ \label{fdeq } 
 \rho M_{\mathrm{p } } \ge \frac { 3\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV, E100 } } } { 4 thousand } \frac { F_{\mathrm{p } } } { F_{\mathrm{\oplus } } } t_{\mathrm{loss, crit}}$$ 

 The exciting implication of equation (\[fdeq\ ]) is that we can use it to obtain low limits on mass for the much larger population of * Kepler * super - ground and sub - Neptunes for which we do not have measured densities. This will help identify promising targets for follow - up work with radial velocity observations. This is shown in equation (\[masslimeq\ ]). 

 $ $ \label{masslimeq } 
 M_{\mathrm{p } } \ge \sqrt { \frac{\pi\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV, E100}}}{G } \frac{F_{\mathrm{p}}}{F_{\mathrm{\oplus } } } t_{\mathrm{loss, crit } } } \, R_{\mathrm{p}}^{3/2}$$ 

 Table \[masslimtab\ ] applies equation (\[masslimeq\ ]) to a list of * Kepler * campaigner smaller than 4 $ R_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ that are well suited to radial - speed follow - up. We exclude any planet with $ F_{\mathrm{p } } > 500 $ $ F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, since equation (\[masslimeq\ ]) is not valid in that regime. Also, we limited the sample to only those planets with minimal radial velocity semi - amplitudes $ K_{\mathrm{min}}>1.0 \: \mathrm{m \, s^{-1}}$ around stars with Kepler magnitude brighter than 13, since these will be the most promising for RV follow - up. In the end, this leaves
 thgeshold, then we can writt down a simple erpressimn for the thrdshold. This is shown in equavion (\[fdeq\]), which is valid for plxnets arolnd Sun-lije suars with $F_{\mathrm{'}}< 500$ $F_{\mathvi{\oplhd}}$. Thz 500 $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ gut excludev highly irradhageb rocky planets like Kepler-10b and CoRjT-7b. Thexe planets may hwve pgce gad volatiles in the past, but they are linely rocky tocay and so H/He mass loss id no longer relevant. Tjis cut alsi exsoudes the reeion where energy-limitgd escape breaks down and mass luss bzcomes radiqtuon dnd recombiiation limited [Murvsy-Clay2009]{}

$$\nabel{fdrq}
\rho M_{\mathrm{p}} \ge \frqc{ 3\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,X100}} } { 4 G } \frac{ F_{\mathrm{k}} } { F_{\mathrk{\o'lus}} } t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}$$

Rhw exchtinc imooicxtikn or equahioi (\[fdeq\]) is tgat we can yse it to obtain loeew limits on maas for tre much larger population of *Kepler* suptr-Earfhs and sub-Neptunes for which we do not have measured densities. This will help identify promising targats fkf filjuq-uo work with radial velocity observations. This js smown in equation (\[masslimeq\]).

$$\lsbfl{kwsslimeq}
M_{\mathtm{p}} \ge \sqrf{ \frac{\pi\epsilon F_{\mwthrm{XUD,E100}}}{G} \feac{F_{\mathri{p}}}{F_{\msthrm{\oplus}}} t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}} \, R_{\mathrm{p}}^{3/2}$$

Tabjw \[masslimtab\] applizs equation (\[oasskimeq\]) to a list of *Kepler* caudidatss smaller hhan 4 $R_{\maffrm{\oplus}}$ that ard wvll vuited to radial-velocity fjllow-up. Wx exckuded avy pkanets with $F_{\matjrm{p}}> 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, since equajion (\[mdsslimeq\]) id not valid in that regime. Also, we limited thg sdmpne to onjy thpse planets wyth minimum rabial veljcity semi-amplinudes $K_{\mavhrm{min}}>1.0 \: \matrrm{m \, s^{-1}}$ aroung stars with Nepler mwgnirude brightdf than 13, since yhese will be the mist promising for VV foumow-up. In the enb, uhus leaves
threshold, then we can write down a for threshold. This shown in equation planets Sun-like stars with 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$. The $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ cut excludes highly irradiated rocky like Kepler-10b and CoRoT-7b. These planets may have once had volatiles in the but they are likely rocky today and so H/He mass loss is no relevant. cut excludes region where energy-limited escape breaks down and mass loss becomes radiation and recombination limited [Murray-Clay2009]{} $$\label{fdeq} M_{\mathrm{p}} \ge \frac{ 3\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}} } { 4 } \frac{ F_{\mathrm{p}} } F_{\mathrm{\oplus}} } t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}$$ The exciting of (\[fdeq\]) is we use to obtain lower on mass for the much larger population of *Kepler* super-Earths and sub-Neptunes for which we do not measured densities. help identify targets follow-up with radial velocity is shown in equation (\[masslimeq\]). $$\label{masslimeq} \frac{\pi\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}}}{G} \frac{F_{\mathrm{p}}}{F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}} t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}} \, R_{\mathrm{p}}^{3/2}$$ Table \[masslimtab\] equation (\[masslimeq\]) a list of *Kepler* candidates smaller 4 $R_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ that are well suited to radial-velocity We excluded any planets with $F_{\mathrm{p}}> 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, since equation (\[masslimeq\]) is not valid in Also, we limited the to only those with radial semi-amplitudes \: \mathrm{m s^{-1}}$ around stars with Kepler magnitude brighter than 13, since these be the most promising for RV follow-up. In the end,
 threshold, then we can write doWn a simple eXpresSioN foR tHe thReshOld. This is shown IN equAtion (\[fdeq\]), which is valid fOr plaNeTS aroUNd sun-liKe stars WItH $f_{\MatHrM{p}}< 500$ $f_{\maThRM{\oPlus}}$. THe 500 $F_{\Mathrm{\oPlus}}$ cut excLudEs Highly irradiATeD rocky planEts Like Kepler-10b aNd CORoT-7b. THeSe pLAnets May Have oNce had VOlatilEs in the paSt, BUt they ARe likelY ROcKy toDay and so H/He mass loSS iS No longer relevaNt. This CuT AlSO ExcLudEs the regioN wHere eNErgy-limITeD ESCapE Breaks down and Mass loss becOMes RadiatIoN anD RecombInatiOn LImiTed [Murray-ClAy2009]{}

$$\laBel{fdeq}
\rhO M_{\mathRM{p}} \ge \fraC{ 3\Epsilon f_{\mathrM{XUv,E100}} } { 4 G } \Frac{ f_{\MaThRm{p}} } { f_{\mAThrM{\OpLus}} } T_{\MatHrm{loss,cRiT}}$$

THe excItinG IMPLicaTioN of eQuatiOn (\[fdeq\]) is that wE caN use IT to ObtaiN loweR limItS on maSs for tHe mucH lArger population Of *KePler* super-earThS anD sUb-NepTUnes foR whIch We do not Have meaSUreD dENSItIes. This will help ideNtIFY pRomising TargetS FoR fOLlow-up woRk WitH radIAL veloCity OBsErvationS. This iS ShOwN in equaTiOn (\[massLiMeq\]).

$$\LabEl{masSLimeQ}
M_{\mathRm{p}} \ge \sqrT{ \frac{\PI\epsilon F_{\mathrM{xUV,E100}}}{G} \frac{F_{\matHRm{P}}}{f_{\MaTHrm{\oPluS}}} t_{\mathrm{losS,criT}}} \, r_{\matHrm{p}}^{3/2}$$

tAbLe \[mASslimTab\] apPlIEs EQuation (\[masslimeq\]) to a LiSt of *KePler* cAndidates smalLer than 4 $R_{\maTHRM{\oplus}}$ thAt arE WeLL suited to radiaL-veloCity follow-UP. We excluDed anY planets With $F_{\mathRM{P}}> 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\OplUs}}$, sIncE eqUATiOn (\[masslimeq\]) is NOT valId In that rEgiMe. Also, wE liMitEd tHe sAmPle to only Those plaNeTs WiTh MinImum rADial veloCiTy sEmI-amPlituDEs $K_{\matHrm{miN}}>1.0 \: \matHrM{m \, S^{-1}}$ AroUnd starS WiTH keplEr MaGnitUde BrIghteR thaN 13, SinCe these Will be the MosT PromIsInG for RV fOllow-up. In the eNd, This leaves
 threshold, then we can wr ite down a  simp leexp re ssio n fo r the threshol d . Th is is shown in equatio n (\[ fd e q\]) ,  w hichis vali d  f o r  pl an et s a ro u nd  Sun- lik e stars  with $F_{ \ma th rm{p}}< 500$ $F _{\mathrm{ \op lus}}$. The500  $F_{\ ma thr m {\opl us} }$ cu t excl u des hi ghly irra di a ted ro c ky plan e t slike  Kepler-10b and C o Ro T -7b. These pla nets m ay ha v e  on cehad volati le s int he past ,  b u t the y  are likely r ocky todaya ndso H/H emas s  lossis no  l o nge r relevant.  Thi s cut als o excl u des the regionwhereene rgy -lim i te desc ap e  br e ak s d o wnand mass  l os s bec omes r a d iati onandrecom bination limi ted  [Mu r ray -Clay 2009] {}
$$ \labe l{fdeq }
\rh oM_{\mathrm{p}}\ge\frac{ 3\ eps il onF_ {\mat h rm{XUV ,E1 00} } } { 4  G } \f r ac{  F _ { \ ma thrm{p}} } { F_{\m at h r m{ \oplus}}  } t_{ \ ma th r m{loss,c ri t}} $$
T h e exc itin g  i mplicati on ofe qu at ion (\[ fd eq\])is  th atwe ca n  use  it to  obtainlower limits on mass for the muchl ar g e rp opul ati on of *Kepl er*s uper -Ear t hs  an d  sub- Neptu ne s  f o r which we do not h av e meas ureddensities. Th is will he l p identify  pro m is i ng targets for  foll ow-up work with rad ial v elocityobservati o n s. Thisissho wnine q ua tion (\[massl i m eq\] ). 

$$\la bel {massli meq }
M _{\ mat hr m{p}} \ge  \sqrt{\f ra c{ \p i\e psilo n  F_{\mat hr m{X UV ,E1 00}}} { G} \fr ac{F_ {\ma th rm { p}} }{F_{\m a th r m {\op lu s} }} t _{\ ma thrm{ loss , cri t}}} \,  R_{\math rm{ p }}^{ 3/ 2} $$

Tab le \[masslimt ab \] applies  e qua tion ( \ [ masslime q\]) to a list of *Kepl e r* cand ida tes s mall er than 4  $R _{\mat hrm { \oplus }}$ th at ar ewel l suite d to  ra di al-velocit y fol low-u p.  Weexclude d any planets with $F_ {\mathrm{p}}>  50 0$ $ F _ {\ mat h rm { \op lu s }}$ , since equation(\[masslim eq \ ])  is not va l idin  that r egime.Also, we limi ted the s ample toon ly t h o seplanets wi th minim um radial veloc i ty  semi -am plitud es  $K _{\ma thrm{m i n}} >1.0\: \ma th rm{m \ , s^{ -1 }}$ arou nd stars with Kepler ma gnitud e bri ght er than 1 3,s inc e these w illbe the mos t p rom ising  fo r  RV f ollo w -u p.I n the  end ,  this lea v es 
 threshold,_then we_can write down a_simple expression_for_the threshold._This_is shown in_equation (\[fdeq\]), which_is valid for planets_around Sun-like stars_with_$F_{\mathrm{p}}< 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$. The 500 $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ cut excludes highly irradiated rocky planets like Kepler-10b_and_CoRoT-7b. These_planets_may_have once had volatiles in_the past, but they are_likely rocky_today and so H/He mass loss is no_longer_relevant. This cut_also excludes the region where energy-limited escape breaks down_and mass loss becomes radiation and_recombination limited [Murray-Clay2009]{}

$$\label{fdeq}
\rho_M_{\mathrm{p}}_\ge_\frac{ 3\epsilon F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}} }_{ 4 G } \frac{ F_{\mathrm{p}}_} { F_{\mathrm{\oplus}} } t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}$$

The exciting_implication of equation (\[fdeq\]) is that we_can use it to obtain lower_limits on mass for the_much larger_population of *Kepler* super-Earths and_sub-Neptunes for which_we do_not have measured_densities. This will help identify promising_targets for follow-up_work with radial velocity observations. This_is_shown in equation_(\[masslimeq\]).

$$\label{masslimeq}
M_{\mathrm{p}}_\ge_\sqrt{ \frac{\pi\epsilon_F_{\mathrm{XUV,E100}}}{G} \frac{F_{\mathrm{p}}}{F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}} t_{\mathrm{loss,crit}}}_\,_R_{\mathrm{p}}^{3/2}$$

Table \[masslimtab\]_applies_equation (\[masslimeq\]) to a list of_*Kepler*_candidates smaller than 4 $R_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ that are_well suited to radial-velocity_follow-up._We excluded any planets_with $F_{\mathrm{p}}> 500$ $F_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, since_equation (\[masslimeq\]) is not valid in_that regime._Also, we_limited the sample to only those planets with minimum radial velocity_semi-amplitudes $K_{\mathrm{min}}>1.0 \: \mathrm{m \, s^{-1}}$_around stars with Kepler_magnitude brighter_than_13, since these_will_be the_most promising for RV follow-up. In the_end, this_leaves