 as it could seem more natural). The equation (\[eq10\]) is replaced by the following equation

$$\label{eq13}
\frac{d\bar Z}{d\tau}=U^{pl-1}\bar H\Big(\frac{\tau}{U},\bar Z,U^p,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma\Big),$$

where $\bar H$ is given by (\[eq11\]). Let $\bar G$ be the right hand side of (\[eq13\]). It is smooth for $U>0,$ but since it is function of $\alpha\frac{\tau}{U},$ it is not well-defined in a whole neighborhood of the point $\{(\tau,\bar Z,U,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0)\}.$ Fortunately, we only need to integrate (\[eq13\]) in a closed domain $\ov{\cal D}$:

[**Definition of $\ov{\cal D}$.**]{} The domain $\ov{\cal D}$ is defined in the space $(\tau,U,\bar Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)$ defined by

1.  $U\in [0,U_1],$ $|\alpha|\leq \alpha_0$ and $\tau\in [0,U\omega (\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)]$, where $U_1,\alpha_0>0$ are chosen arbitrarily small (the time $\tau=U\omega( \frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)$ corresponds to the time $t=-\ln \frac{u}{u_0}=-l\ln \frac{U}{u_0})$,

2.  $(\bar Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)\in \A,$ an arbitrarily small closed neighborhood of the value $(0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0).$

We want to prove that $\bar G$ is of class ${\cal C}^{l-2}$ on $\ov{\cal{D}}.$ We will first prove a technical lemma about the partial derivatives of the function $\bar G.$ Let us denote by $\partial_m \bar G$ any partial derivative of $\bar G$ corresponding to a multi-index $m=(m_1,\ldots,m_s)$ associated to the variables $\tau,U
as it could seem more natural). The equation (\[eq10\ ]) is replaced by the following equality 

 $ $ \label{eq13 } 
 \frac{d\bar Z}{d\tau}=U^{pl-1}\bar H\Big(\frac{\tau}{U},\bar Z, U^p, v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma\Big),$$ 

 where $ \bar H$ is render by (\[eq11\ ]). Let $ \bar G$ be the right bridge player english of (\[eq13\ ]). It is smooth for $ U>0,$ but since it is function of $ \alpha\frac{\tau}{U},$ it is not well - define in a hale neighborhood of the point $ \{(\tau,\bar Z, U, v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0)\}.$ Fortunately, we only need to desegregate (\[eq13\ ]) in a closed domain $ \ov{\cal D}$: 

 [ * * Definition of $ \ov{\cal D}$. * * ] { } The domain $ \ov{\cal D}$ is defined in the quad $ (\tau, U,\bar Z, v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)$ defined by 

 1.   $ U\in [ 0,U_1],$ $ |\alpha|\leq \alpha_0 $ and $ \tau\in [ 0,U\omega (\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)]$, where $ U_1,\alpha_0>0 $ are chosen arbitrarily small (the clock time $ \tau = U\omega (\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)$ corresponds to the time $ t=-\ln \frac{u}{u_0}=-l\ln \frac{U}{u_0})$, 

 2.   $ (\bar Z, v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)\in \A,$ an arbitrarily small shut neighborhood of the value $ (0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0).$ 

 We want to testify that $ \bar G$ is of class $ { \cal C}^{l-2}$ on $ \ov{\cal{D}}.$ We will foremost prove a technical lemma about the fond derivatives of the function $ \bar G.$ Let us denote by $ \partial_m \bar G$ any fond derivative of $ \bar G$ corresponding to a multi - index $ m=(m_1,\ldots, m_s)$ associated to the variables $ \tau, U
 as it could seem more natuval). The equation (\[eq10\]) is ceplaces by the following equation

$$\label{eq13}
\frec{d\bqr Z}{d\ucu}=U^{pl-1}\bar H\Big(\frac{\tau}{J},\bar Z,U^p,v,\ju,\alpha,\my,\signq\Big),$$

where $\uzr H$ is given ny (\[eq11\]). Oet $\bar G$ be tme right hatd side of (\[eq13\]). Ht id smooth for $U>0,$ but since it is funceion of $\appha\frac{\tau}{U},$ ij is mjt wsll-defined in a whole neighborhood of the point $\{(\tau,\bar Z,U,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0)\}.$ Vortknately, we only nefd to integtzte (\[wq13\]) in a closdd domain $\ov{\cal D}$:

[**Definjtion of $\ov{\cal D}$.**]{} The domain $\ov{\cxl D}$ ns defined un thf space $(\tau,U,\uar Z,v,\gu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)$ definad by

1.  $I\in [0,U_1],$ $|\alpha|\leq \al'ha_0$ qnd $\tau\in [0,U\omega (\frac{N^l}{u_0},\alpha)]$, where $U_1,\alphw_0>0$ are choveu arbitrarily small (tye time $\tau=G\omeeq( \ffac{H^l}{n_0},\allha)$ cogreaponds to fhe time $t=-\lb \frac{u}{u_0}=-l\ln \frac{U}{u_0})$,

2.  $(\bwg Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\aigma)\ig \W,$ an arbitrarily small closed neighborhmod of the value $(0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0).$

We want to prove that $\bwr G$ is os class ${\cal C}^{l-2}$ on $\ov{\cal{D}}.$ We will first prove a tewhnicel lenmw qblut the partial derivatives of the function $\bwd B.$ Ket us denote ny $\partial_m \bar G$ snj lwrtial derivajive of $\bad G$ corresponding ho a mujti-ineex $m=(m_1,\ldous,m_s)$ sssociated to the variables $\tau,U
as it could seem more natural). The is by the equation $$\label{eq13} \frac{d\bar H$ given by (\[eq11\]). $\bar G$ be right hand side of (\[eq13\]). It smooth for $U>0,$ but since it is function of $\alpha\frac{\tau}{U},$ it is not in a whole neighborhood of the point $\{(\tau,\bar Z,U,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0)\}.$ Fortunately, we only need integrate in closed $\ov{\cal D}$: [**Definition of $\ov{\cal D}$.**]{} The domain $\ov{\cal D}$ is defined in the space $(\tau,U,\bar defined by 1. $U\in [0,U_1],$ $|\alpha|\leq \alpha_0$ and [0,U\omega (\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)]$, where $U_1,\alpha_0>0$ chosen arbitrarily small (the time \frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)$ to the $t=-\ln \frac{U}{u_0})$, $(\bar Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)\in \A,$ arbitrarily small closed neighborhood of the value $(0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0).$ We want to prove that $\bar G$ is of ${\cal C}^{l-2}$ We will prove technical about the partial the function $\bar G.$ Let us \bar G$ any partial derivative of $\bar G$ to a $m=(m_1,\ldots,m_s)$ associated to the variables $\tau,U
 as it could seem more natural). THe equation (\[Eq10\]) is rEplAceD bY the FollOwing equation

$$\lABel{eQ13}
\frac{d\bar Z}{d\tau}=U^{pl-1}\bar H\BIg(\fraC{\tAU}{U},\baR z,U^P,v,\nu,\aLpha,\mu,\sIGmA\bIg),$$

wHeRe $\Bar h$ iS GiVen by (\[Eq11\]). LEt $\bar G$ bE the right hAnd SiDe of (\[eq13\]). It is smOOtH for $U>0,$ but siNce It is function Of $\aLpha\frAc{\Tau}{u},$ It is nOt wEll-deFined iN A whole NeighborhOoD Of the pOInt $\{(\tau,\bAR z,U,V,\nu,\aLpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigmA_0)\}.$ foRTunately, we only Need to InTEgRATe (\[eQ13\]) in A closed domAiN $\ov{\caL d}$:

[**DefiniTIoN OF $\Ov{\cAL D}$.**]{} The domain $\ov{\Cal D}$ is definED in The spaCe $(\Tau,u,\Bar Z,v,\nU,\alphA,\mU,\SigMa)$ defined by

1.  $u\in [0,U_1],$ $|\Alpha|\leq \aLpha_0$ anD $\Tau\in [0,U\oMEga (\frac{u^l}{u_0},\alpHa)]$, wHerE $U_1,\alPHa_0>0$ ArE chOsEN arBItRarILy sMall (the tImE $\tAu=U\omEga( \fRAC{u^L}{u_0},\alPha)$ CorrEsponDs to the time $t=-\lN \frAc{u}{u_0}=-L\Ln \fRac{U}{u_0})$,

2.  $(\Bar Z,v,\Nu,\alPhA,\mu,\siGma)\in \A,$ An arbItRarily small closEd neIghborhooD of ThE vaLuE $(0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\siGMa_0).$

We waNt tO prOve that $\Bar G$ is oF ClaSs ${\CAL c}^{l-2}$ On $\ov{\cal{D}}.$ We will firsT pROVe A technicAl lemmA AbOuT The partiAl DerIvatIVEs of tHe fuNCtIon $\bar G.$ LEt us deNOtE bY $\partiaL_m \Bar G$ anY pArtIal DerivATive Of $\bar G$ CorrespoNding TO a multi-index $m=(m_1,\LDots,m_s)$ associaTEd TO ThE VariAblEs $\tau,U
 as it could seem more nat ural). The  equa tio n ( \[ eq10 \])is replaced by thefollowing equation

$$ \labe l{ e q13} \f rac{d \bar Z} { d\ t a u}= U^ {p l-1 }\ b ar  H\Bi g(\ frac{\t au}{U},\ba r Z ,U ^p,v,\nu,\al p ha ,\mu,\sigm a\B ig),$$

wher e $ \bar H $isg ivenby(\[eq 11\]). Let $\ bar G$ be  t h e righ t  hand s i d eof ( \[eq13\]). It iss mo o th for $U>0,$but si nc e  i t isfun ction of $ \a lpha\ f rac{\ta u }{ U } , $ i t  is not well- defined ina  wh ole ne ig hbo r hood o f the  p o int  $\{(\tau,\ barZ,U,v,\nu ,\alph a ,\mu,\s i gma)=(0 ,0,0,0 ,0, 0,\ mu_0 , \s ig ma_ 0) \ }.$ Fo rtu n ate ly, we o nl yneedto i n t e g rate  (\ [eq1 3\])in a closed d oma in $ \ ov{ \calD}$:
[** De finit ion of  $\ov {\ cal D}$.**]{} T he d omain $\o v{\ ca l D }$  is d e finedinthe  space$(\tau, U ,\b ar Z , v, \nu,\alpha,\mu,\si gm a ) $definedby

1.  $ U\ i n [0,U_1 ], $ $ |\al p h a|\le q \a l ph a_0$ and  $\tau \ in  [ 0,U\ome ga  (\fra c{ U^l }{u _0},\ a lpha )]$, w here $U_ 1,\al p ha_0>0$ are ch o sen arbitrari l ys m al l  (th e t ime $\tau=U \ome g a( \ frac { U^ l}{ u _0},\ alpha )$ co r responds to the tim e$t=-\l n \fr ac{u}{u_0}=-l \ln \frac{ U } { u_0})$,
2.$( \ bar Z,v,\nu,\a lpha, \mu,\sigma ) \in \A,$  an a rbitrari ly smallc l osed nei ghb orh ood  of t he  value $(0,0, 0 , 0,\m u_ 0,\sigm a_0 ).$

We  wa nttopro ve  that $\b ar G$ is  o fcl as s $ {\cal C}^{l-2} $on$\ ov{ \cal{ D }}.$ W e wil l fi rs tp rov e a tec h ni c a l le mm aabou t t he  part iald eri vatives  of the f unc t ion$\ ba r G.$ L et us denoteby  $\partial _m  \b ar G$a n y partia l derivative of $\bar G $  corres pon dingto a  multi-in dex  $m=(m _1, \ ldots, m_s)$assoc ia ted t o the v ar iab le s $\tau,U
 as_it could_seem more natural). The_equation (\[eq10\])_is_replaced by_the_following equation

$$\label{eq13}
\frac{d\bar Z}{d\tau}=U^{pl-1}\bar_H\Big(\frac{\tau}{U},\bar Z,U^p,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma\Big),$$

where $\bar_H$ is given by_(\[eq11\]). Let $\bar_G$_be the right hand side of (\[eq13\]). It is smooth for $U>0,$ but since_it_is function_of_$\alpha\frac{\tau}{U},$_it is not well-defined in_a whole neighborhood of the_point $\{(\tau,\bar_Z,U,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)=(0,0,0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0)\}.$ Fortunately, we only need to integrate (\[eq13\])_in_a closed domain_$\ov{\cal D}$:

[**Definition of $\ov{\cal D}$.**]{} The domain $\ov{\cal D}$_is defined in the space $(\tau,U,\bar_Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)$ defined by

1.__$U\in_[0,U_1],$ $|\alpha|\leq \alpha_0$ and_$\tau\in [0,U\omega (\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)]$, where $U_1,\alpha_0>0$ are_chosen arbitrarily small (the time $\tau=U\omega(_\frac{U^l}{u_0},\alpha)$ corresponds to the time $t=-\ln \frac{u}{u_0}=-l\ln_\frac{U}{u_0})$,

2.  $(\bar Z,v,\nu,\alpha,\mu,\sigma)\in \A,$ an_arbitrarily small closed neighborhood of_the value_$(0,0,0,0,\mu_0,\sigma_0).$

We want to prove that_$\bar G$ is_of class_${\cal C}^{l-2}$ on_$\ov{\cal{D}}.$ We will first prove a_technical lemma about_the partial derivatives of the function_$\bar_G.$ Let us_denote_by_$\partial_m \bar_G$ any partial_derivative_of $\bar_G$_corresponding to a multi-index $m=(m_1,\ldots,m_s)$ associated_to_the variables $\tau,U