 in Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]. Eq.  tells that, apart from a constant $F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$, the curves should be smooth functions of $T^2$.

To compute the universal function $F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ we arbitrarily fix the scale $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$ (since, see Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\], all our curves for $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$ have some temperature overlap with the curve for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$). We fit to a quadratic polynomial in $T^2$ each curve $\overline{\langle
  q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$ for an interval $0< T^2 <
T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}$, see appendix \[sect:T-fits\]. We compute $g(\xi_L/L)\equiv F_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ as the ratio of the two $T^2$-fits, the one for a generic value of $\xi_L/L$ and the fit for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$, as evaluated at $T^2=T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}/2$.

Our computation of the ratio $g(\xi_L/L)$ respects three consistency tests: (i) $g(\xi_L/L)$ turns out to be essentially model independent (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (ii) $g(\xi_L/L)\sim (L/\xi_L)^{2}$ for small $\xi_L/L$ (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (iii) the product of $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$ with $g(\xi_L/L)$ produces $\xi_L/L$ independent curves. (Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\]).

Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\] shows the (modified) scaling field $[\hat
  u_h(T)]^2 F_{q^2}(0.4)$. Given the $T^2$
in Fig.   \[fig: scaling - gy\ ]. Eq.    tells that, apart from a constant $ F_{q^2}(\xi_L / L)$, the curves should be legato function of $ T^2$. 

 To compute the universal function $ F_{q^2}(\xi_L / L)$ we randomly fix the scale $ (\xi_L / L)=0.4 $ (since, see Fig.   \[fig: scaling - gy\ ], all our bend for $ \overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $ \xi_L / L$ have some temperature lap with the curvature for $ (\xi_L / L)=0.4 $). We fit to a quadratic polynomial in $ T^2 $ each crook $ \overline{\langle 
   q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $ \xi_L / L$ for an interval $ 0 < T^2 < 
 T^2_{\mathrm{max }, \xi_L / L}$, visualize appendix   \[sect: T - fits\ ]. We compute $ g(\xi_L / L)\equiv F_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{q^2}(\xi_L / L)$ as the ratio of the two $ T^2$-fits, the one for a generic value of $ \xi_L / L$ and the fit for $ (\xi_L / L)=0.4 $, as evaluated at $ T^2 = T^2_{\mathrm{max }, \xi_L / L}/2$. 

 Our computation of the ratio $ g(\xi_L / L)$ respect three consistency tests: (i) $ g(\xi_L / L)$ turns out to be basically model independent (Fig.   \[fig: scaling - gy\ ]); (ii) $ g(\xi_L / L)\sim (L/\xi_L)^{2}$ for little $ \xi_L / L$ (Fig.   \[fig: scaling - gy\ ]); (iii) the product of $ \overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at repair $ \xi_L / L$ with $ g(\xi_L / L)$ produces $ \xi_L / L$ independent curves. (Fig.   \[fig: q2 - scaling\ ]). 

 Fig.   \[fig: q2 - scaling\ ] shows the (modified) scale field $ [ \hat 
   u_h(T)]^2 F_{q^2}(0.4)$. Given the $ T^2 $
 in Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]. Eq.  tellr that, apart from a coistant $R_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$, tfe curves should be smooth fnnctuons if $T^2$.

To compute the unixersal fujction $F_{w^2}(\xi_L/O)$ we arbitredily fiw the dcalz $(\ei_L/L)=0.4$ (since, see Nig. \[fig:scalitg-gy\], all our cgrxed for $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixqd $\xi_L/L$ hwve some tempetaturt oderlzi cith the curve for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$). We fit fo a quedratic polynomoal in $T^2$ each curve $\overlije{\lajgle
  q^2\rangle}$ at flxed $\xi_L/L$ fir ag interval $0< T^2 <
T^2_{\mathrm{maq}, \xi_L/L}$, see zppendix \[sect:T-fits\]. We compute $g(\xk_L/L)\eqbiv F_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{q^2}(\xi_L/O)$ qs hve ratio of the nwo $T^2$-fits, the one for a genetic value of $\xl_L/L$ aid tye fit for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$, as eveluated at $T^2=T^2_{\mathrm{mwx}, \xi_L/L}/2$.

Ous eomputation of the rarii $g(\xi_N/L)$ raspezrs ghrte ronaistenfy vests: (i) $g(\xi_M/L)$ turns our to be essentially mjeel independeht (Fig. \[sid:scaling-gy\]); (ii) $g(\xi_L/L)\sim (L/\xi_L)^{2}$ for small $\xp_L/L$ (Rig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (iii) the product of $\overline{\lwngle q^2\raggle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$ with $g(\xi_L/L)$ produces $\xi_L/L$ indepandenv zurrcf. (Dih. \[fig:q2-scaling\]).

Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\] shows the (modified) acslpng field $[\hat
  u_h(B)]^2 F_{q^2}(0.4)$. Given the $T^2$
in Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]. Eq. tells that, apart constant the curves be smooth functions universal $F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ we arbitrarily the scale $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$ see Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\], all our curves $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$ have some temperature overlap with the curve for We fit to a quadratic polynomial in $T^2$ each curve $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at $\xi_L/L$ an $0< < T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}$, see appendix \[sect:T-fits\]. We compute $g(\xi_L/L)\equiv F_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ as the ratio of the two the one for a generic value of $\xi_L/L$ the fit for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$, evaluated at $T^2=T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}/2$. Our of ratio $g(\xi_L/L)$ three tests: $g(\xi_L/L)$ turns out be essentially model independent (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (ii) $g(\xi_L/L)\sim (L/\xi_L)^{2}$ for small $\xi_L/L$ (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (iii) the product $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ $\xi_L/L$ with produces independent (Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\]). Fig. the (modified) scaling field $[\hat u_h(T)]^2 $T^2$
 in Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]. Eq.  tells tHat, apart frOm a coNstAnt $f_{q^2}(\Xi_L/L)$, The cUrves should be sMOoth Functions of $T^2$.

To compute tHe uniVeRSal fUNcTion $F_{Q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ we ARbITRarIlY fIx tHe SCaLe $(\xi_L/l)=0.4$ (siNce, see FIg. \[fig:scaliNg-gY\], aLl our curves fOR $\oVerline{\lanGle Q^2\rangle}$ at fixEd $\xI_L/L$ havE sOme TEmperAtuRe oveRlap wiTH the cuRve for $(\xi_L/l)=0.4$). WE Fit to a QUadratiC POlYnomIal in $T^2$ each curve $\ovERlINe{\langle
  q^2\ranglE}$ at fixEd $\XI_L/l$ FOr aN inTerval $0< T^2 <
T^2_{\maThRm{max}, \XI_L/L}$, see aPPeNDIX \[seCT:T-fits\]. We compuTe $g(\xi_L/L)\equiV f_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{Q^2}(\xi_L/L)$ aS tHe rATio of tHe two $t^2$-fITs, tHe one for a geNeriC value of $\xI_L/L$ and THe fit foR $(\Xi_L/L)=0.4$, as eValuatEd aT $T^2=T^2_{\MathRM{mAx}, \Xi_L/l}/2$.

OUR coMPuTatIOn oF the ratiO $g(\Xi_l/L)$ resPectS THREe coNsiStenCy tesTs: (i) $g(\xi_L/L)$ turns Out To be ESseNtialLy modEl inDePendeNt (Fig. \[fIg:scaLiNg-gy\]); (ii) $g(\xi_L/L)\sim (L/\Xi_L)^{2}$ fOr small $\xi_l/L$ (FIg. \[Fig:ScAling-GY\]); (iii) thE prOduCt of $\oveRline{\laNGle Q^2\rANGLe}$ At fixed $\xi_L/L$ with $g(\xi_l/L)$ PROdUces $\xi_L/L$ IndepeNDeNt CUrves. (Fig. \[FiG:q2-sCaliNG\]).

fig. \[fiG:q2-scALiNg\] shows tHe (modiFIeD) sCaling fIeLd $[\hat
  u_H(T)]^2 f_{q^2}(0.4)$. GIveN the $T^2$
 in Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\ ]. Eq.  te lls t hat , a pa rt f roma constant $F_ { q^2} (\xi_L/L)$, the curves  shou ld be s m oo th fu nctions of $ T^2 $. 
Toco m pu te th e u niversa l function  $F _{ q^2}(\xi_L/L ) $we arbitra ril y fix the sc ale  $(\xi _L /L) = 0.4$(si nce,see Fi g . \[fi g:scaling -g y \], al l  our cu r v es  for  $\overline{\lang l eq ^2\rangle}$ at  fixed  $ \ xi _ L /L$  ha ve some te mp eratu r e overl a pw i t h t h e curve for $ (\xi_L/L)=0 . 4$) . We f it  to a quad ratic  p o lyn omial in $T ^2$each curv e $\ov e rline{\ l angle
 q^2\r ang le} $ at fi xe d $ \x i _L/ L $for aninterval  $ 0<  T^2<
T^ 2 _ { \ math rm{ max} , \xi _L/L}$, see a ppe ndix \[s ect:T -fits \].We  comp ute $g (\xi_ L/ L)\equiv F_{q^2 }(0. 4)/F_{q^2 }(\ xi _L/ L) $ ast he rat ioofthe two  $T^2$- f its ,t h e  o ne for a generic v al u e  o f $\xi_L /L$ an d  t he fit for$( \xi _L/L ) = 0.4$,  ase va luated a t $T^2 = T^ 2_ {\mathr m{ max},\x i_L /L} /2$.Ourcomput ation of  ther atio $g(\xi_L/ L )$ respects t h re e co n sist enc y tests: (i ) $g ( \xi_ L/L) $  t urn s  outto be  e s se n tially model indepe nd ent (F ig. \ [fig:scaling- gy\]); (ii ) $ g(\xi_L/ L)\s i m( L/\xi_L)^{2}$for s mall $\xi_ L /L$ (Fig . \[f ig:scali ng-gy\]); ( iii) the  pr odu ctof$ \ ov erline{\langl e q^2\ ra ngle}$atfixed $ \xi _L/ L$wit h$g(\xi_L/ L)$ prod uc es  $ \x i_L /L$ i n dependen tcur ve s.(Fig. \[fig: q2-sc alin g\ ]) . 

F ig. \[f i g: q 2 -sca li ng \] s how sthe ( modi f ied ) scali ng field$[\ h at
 u _h (T)]^2F_{q^2}(0.4)$ .Given the$T ^2$ 
 in_Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]. Eq. _tells that, apart from_a constant_$F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$,_the curves_should_be smooth functions_of $T^2$.

To compute_the universal function $F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$_we arbitrarily fix_the_scale $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$ (since, see Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\], all our curves for $\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$_have_some temperature_overlap_with_the curve for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$). We_fit to a quadratic polynomial_in $T^2$_each curve $\overline{\langle
  q^2\rangle}$ at fixed $\xi_L/L$_for_an interval $0<_T^2 <
T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}$, see appendix \[sect:T-fits\]. We compute $g(\xi_L/L)\equiv F_{q^2}(0.4)/F_{q^2}(\xi_L/L)$_as the ratio of the two_$T^2$-fits, the one_for_a_generic value of $\xi_L/L$_and the fit for $(\xi_L/L)=0.4$, as_evaluated at $T^2=T^2_{\mathrm{max}, \xi_L/L}/2$.

Our computation of_the ratio $g(\xi_L/L)$ respects three consistency tests:_(i) $g(\xi_L/L)$ turns out to be_essentially model independent (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (ii)_$g(\xi_L/L)\sim (L/\xi_L)^{2}$_for small $\xi_L/L$ (Fig. \[fig:scaling-gy\]); (iii)_the product of_$\overline{\langle q^2\rangle}$_at fixed $\xi_L/L$_with $g(\xi_L/L)$ produces $\xi_L/L$ independent curves._(Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\]).

Fig. \[fig:q2-scaling\] shows the_(modified) scaling field $[\hat
  u_h(T)]^2_F_{q^2}(0.4)$._Given the $T^2$