ähler polarization agree with the quantization coming from a real polarization? The results of this manuscript confirms independence of polarization in a rather large class of examples, significantly extending previously known results which were restricted to special cases such as toric varieties and flag varieties.

We next briefly motivate the theory of Newton-Okounkov bodies. The famous Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg and Kirwan convexity theorems link equivariant symplectic and algebraic geometry to the combinatorics of polytopes. In the case of a toric variety $X$, the combinatorics of its moment map polytope $\Delta$ fully encodes the geometry of $X$, but this fails in the general case. In his influential work, Okounkov constructed (circa roughly 1996), for an (irreducible) projective variety $X \subseteq {\mathbb{P}}(V)$ equipped with an action of a reductive algebraic group $G$, a convex body $\tilde{\Delta}$ and a natural projection from $\tilde{\Delta}$ to the moment polytope $\Delta$ of $X$. Moreover, the volumes of the fibers of this projection encode the asymptotics of the multiplicities of the irreducible representations appearing in the homogeneous coordinate ring of $X$, or in other words, the Duistermaat-Heckman measure [@Okounkov-BM; @Okounkov-log-concave]. Recently, Askold Khovanskii and the third author (also independently Lazarsfeld and Mustata [@LazMus]) vastly generalized Okounkov’s ideas [@KavKho], and in particular constructed such $\tilde{\Delta}$ (called *Newton-Okounkov bodies* or sometimes simply *Okounkov bodies*) even without presence of any group action. In the setting studied by Okounkov, the maximum possible (real) dimension of the Newton-Okounkov body $\tilde{\Delta}$ is the transcendence degree of ${{\mathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ where $U$ is a maximal unipotent subgroup of $G$; when there is no group action (as in the setting studied in [@LazMus; @KavKho]) we have $\dim_{{{\mathbb{R}}}}(\tilde{\Delta}) = \dim_{{{\mathbb{C}}}}(X).$ Hence one interpretation of the results of Okounkov, Lazarsfeld-Mustata and Kaveh-Khovanskii is that there *is* a convex geometric/combinatorial object of ‘max
ähler polarization agree with the quantization coming from a real polarization? The results of this manuscript confirm independence of polarization in a preferably large class of examples, importantly extending previously known results which were restrict to special cases such as toric assortment and flag varieties. 

 We next concisely motivate the theory of Newton - Okounkov bodies. The famous Atiyah - Guillemin - Sternberg and Kirwan convexity theorems connect equivariant symplectic and algebraic geometry to the combinatorics of polytopes. In the case of a toric variety $ X$, the combinatorics of its moment map polytope $ \Delta$ fully encode the geometry of $ X$, but this fails in the general case. In his influential study, Okounkov constructed (circa roughly 1996), for an (irreducible) projective assortment $ X \subseteq { \mathbb{P}}(V)$ equip with an action of a reductive algebraic group $ G$, a convex body $ \tilde{\Delta}$ and a natural projection from $ \tilde{\Delta}$ to the moment polytope $ \Delta$ of $ X$. furthermore, the volumes of the fibers of this projection encode the asymptotics of the multiplicities of the irreducible representations appearing in the homogeneous coordinate gang of $ X$, or in other words, the Duistermaat - Heckman measure [ @Okounkov - BM; @Okounkov - log - concave ]. Recently, Askold Khovanskii and the third author (also independently Lazarsfeld and Mustata [ @LazMus ]) vastly generalized Okounkov ’s ideas [ @KavKho ], and in particular constructed such $ \tilde{\Delta}$ (call * Newton - Okounkov bodies * or sometimes simply * Okounkov body *) even without bearing of any group legal action. In the setting studied by Okounkov, the maximum possible (real) dimension of the Newton - Okounkov body $ \tilde{\Delta}$ is the transcendence academic degree of $ { { \mathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ where $ U$ is a maximal unipotent subgroup of $ G$; when there is no group action (as in the setting studied in [ @LazMus; @KavKho ]) we have $ \dim_{{{\mathbb{R}}}}(\tilde{\Delta }) = \dim_{{{\mathbb{C}}}}(X).$ Hence one interpretation of the results of Okounkov, Lazarsfeld - Mustata and Kaveh - Khovanskii is that there * is * a convex geometric / combinatorial object of ‘ max
ähleg polarization agree witm the quantization comiig from a real oolarization? The results of vhis manuwcript confirms indepevdence of polarizqtioi in a rather lacfe class of eswmplzs, significantly extending previously knmwv xesults which were restricted to spesial caxed such as toris vagiqtiea and flag varieties.

We next brieflg motivete the theory pf Newton-Okounkov bodies. Tje fwmous Atiyah-Guillelin-Sternbert anq Kirwan convdxity theogzms link eqoivariant symplectic and algebrakc gepmetry to jkw clkbinatorics of pjlytopes. In bne casa of a yoric variety $W$, the conbinatorics of its mokent map polytope $\Qelta$ fulny encodes the geomwtey of $X$, bgt tfus waims ih the henxral case. Ih his influwntial work, Okounkof sinstructed (cidca rotgrly 1996), for an (irreducible) projective varitty $X \subseteq {\mathbb{P}}(V)$ equipped with an action ov a reduceive algebraic group $G$, a convex body $\tilde{\Delta}$ atd a iagurco progwchion from $\tilde{\Delta}$ to the moment polytope $\Dqmts$ pf $X$. Moreover, bhe volumes of the flbrts of this progectiou ehcode the asymptotlcs of jhe muotiplicityes pf the irreducible represenrations appecribg in the homogenelus coordincte rimg of $X$, or in other words, thz Duisfermaat-Hecklan measudd [@Okounkov-BM; @Okojnkpv-nog-concave]. Recently, Askold Khovanskmi anb the thkrd suthor (also indeoendekdly Lazarsfeld and Mustcta [@LdzMus]) vastpy generalized Okounkov’s ideas [@KavKho], and in kardicllar conscructec such $\tilde{\Dqlta}$ (called *Necton-Okouukov budies* or skmetimev simply *Okjunkov bodies*) gven without 'resence jf aby geoup acgkon. In the setying studpeb by Okoubkov, the maximum ppsskgle (real) dimensnub of the Newton-Pkojnkjv bpdr $\tilde{\Delta}$ hs tfe gtanscdndence degvee of ${{\kathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ where $U$ is a mzximal unipotent sibnroup of $T$; when trere is no grpup action (as in tje sevting rtudird yn [@LazMus; @KavKho]) we have $\dim_{{{\mafhbb{R}}}}(\tildf{\Dejta}) = \dim_{{{\mathfb{C}}}}(X).$ Hence one iuterpretation of the results of Okounkov, Lazarsfeld-Mustata and Kaveh-Khovanskin ls that therx *is* a convex gaometric/combinatoriao object of ‘max
ähler polarization agree with the quantization coming real The results this manuscript confirms rather class of examples, extending previously known which were restricted to special cases as toric varieties and flag varieties. We next briefly motivate the theory of bodies. The famous Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg and Kirwan convexity theorems link equivariant symplectic and algebraic to combinatorics polytopes. the case of a toric variety $X$, the combinatorics of its moment map polytope $\Delta$ fully the geometry of $X$, but this fails in general case. In his work, Okounkov constructed (circa roughly for (irreducible) projective $X {\mathbb{P}}(V)$ with an action a reductive algebraic group $G$, a convex body $\tilde{\Delta}$ and a natural projection from $\tilde{\Delta}$ to the polytope $\Delta$ Moreover, the of fibers this projection encode of the multiplicities of the irreducible the homogeneous coordinate ring of $X$, or in words, the measure [@Okounkov-BM; @Okounkov-log-concave]. Recently, Askold Khovanskii the third author (also independently Lazarsfeld and Mustata vastly generalized Okounkov’s ideas [@KavKho], and in particular constructed such $\tilde{\Delta}$ (called *Newton-Okounkov bodies* or *Okounkov bodies*) even without of any group In setting by the maximum (real) dimension of the Newton-Okounkov body $\tilde{\Delta}$ is the transcendence degree ${{\mathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ where $U$ is a maximal unipotent subgroup of $G$; is group action (as the setting studied in @KavKho]) have $\dim_{{{\mathbb{R}}}}(\tilde{\Delta}) = \dim_{{{\mathbb{C}}}}(X).$ interpretation the Lazarsfeld-Mustata Kaveh-Khovanskii that there *is* a geometric/combinatorial object of ‘max
ähler polarization agree witH the quantiZatioN coMinG fRom a Real Polarization? ThE ResuLts of this manuscript conFirms InDEpenDEnCe of pOlarizaTIoN IN a rAtHeR laRgE ClAss of ExaMples, siGnificantlY exTeNding previouSLy Known resulTs wHich were restRicTed to sPeCiaL Cases SucH as toRic varIEties aNd flag varIeTIes.

We nEXt briefLY MoTivaTe the theory of NewtON-OKOunkov bodies. ThE famouS ATIyAH-guiLleMin-SternbeRg And KiRWan convEXiTY THeoREms link equivaRiant sympleCTic And algEbRaiC GeometRy to tHe COmbInatorics of PolyTopes. In thE case oF A toric vARiety $X$, tHe combInaTorIcs oF ItS mOmeNt MAp pOLyTopE $\delTa$ fully eNcOdEs the GeomETRY Of $X$, bUt tHis fAils iN the general caSe. IN his INflUentiAl worK, OkoUnKov coNstrucTed (ciRcA roughly 1996), for an (irReduCible) projEctIvE vaRiEty $X \sUBseteq {\MatHbb{p}}(V)$ equipPed with AN acTiON OF a Reductive algebraic GrOUP $G$, A convex bOdy $\tilDE{\DElTA}$ and a natUrAl pRojeCTIon frOm $\tiLDe{\delta}$ to tHe momeNT pOlYtope $\DeLtA$ of $X$. MoReOveR, thE voluMEs of The fibErs of thiS projECtion encode the ASymptotics of tHE mULTiPLiciTieS of the irredUcibLE repReseNTaTioNS appeAring In THe HOmogeneous coordinatE rIng of $X$, Or in oTher words, the DUistermaat-hECKman measUre [@OKOuNKov-BM; @Okounkov-lOg-conCave]. RecentLY, Askold KHovanSkii and tHe third auTHOr (also inDepEndEntLy LAZArSfeld and MustaTA [@lazMUs]) Vastly gEneRalized okoUnkOv’s IdeAs [@kavKho], and In particUlAr CoNsTruCted sUCh $\tilde{\DElTa}$ (cAlLed *newtoN-okounkOv bodIes* oR sOmETimEs simplY *okOUNkov BoDiEs*) evEn wItHout pReseNCe oF any groUp action. IN thE SettInG sTudied bY Okounkov, the mAxImum possibLe (ReaL) dimenSIOn of the NEwton-Okounkov body $\tilde{\DELta}$ is thE trAnsceNdenCe degree oF ${{\maThbb{C}}}(X)^u$ whERe $U$ is a MaximaL unipOtEnt SUBgrouP OF $G$; WheN tHere is no grOUP acTion (aS iN the Setting Studied in [@LazMus; @KavkHo]) wE have $\dim_{{{\mathbB{R}}}}(\tIlde{\dELtA}) = \diM_{{{\MaTHbb{c}}}}(X).$ hEncE ONe interpretatioN of the resuLtS Of okounkov, LaZArsFeLd-MustaTa and KaVeh-KhOVanskii Is that theRe *is* a convEx GeomETRic/CombinatorIal objecT of ‘max
ähler polarization agree w ith the qu antiz ati onco ming  fro m a real polar i zati on? The results of thi s man us c ript co nfirm s indep e nd e n ceof  p ola ri z at ion i n a  rather  large cla ssof  examples, s i gn ificantlyext ending previ ous ly kno wn  re s ultswhi ch we re res t ricted  to speci al casess uch ast o ri c va rieties and flagv ar i eties.

We nex t brie fl y  m o t iva tethe theory  o f New t on-Okou n ko v b odi e s. The famous  Atiyah-Gui l lem in-Ste rn ber g  and K irwan  c o nve xity theore ms l ink equiv ariant symplec t ic andalgebr aic  ge omet r yto  th ec omb i na tor i csof polyt op es . Inthec a s e  ofa t oric  vari ety $X$, thecom bina t ori cs of  itsmome nt  mappolyto pe $\ De lta$ fully enco desthe geome try  o f $ X$ , but this f ail s i n the g eneralc ase .I n hi s influential work ,O k ou nkov con struct e d(c i rca roug hl y 1 996) , for a n (i r re ducible)  proje c ti ve  variet y$X \su bs ete q { \math b b{P} }(V)$equipped  with an action of a reductive alg e br a i cg roup  $G $, a convex  bod y  $\t ilde { \D elt a }$ an d a n at u ra l  projection from $\ ti lde{\D elta} $ to the mome nt polytop e $ \Delta$of $ X $. Moreover, thevolum es of thef ibers of  this  project ion encod e the asym pto tic s o f t h e  m ultiplicities o f th eirreduc ibl e repre sen tat ion s a pp earing in  the hom og en eo us  co ordin a te ringof  $X $,  or  in o t her wo rds,theDu is t erm aat-Hec k ma n meas ur e[@Ok oun ko v-BM;  @Ok o unk ov-log- concave].  Re c entl y,  A skold K hovanskii and  t he third a ut hor  (also i ndepende ntly Lazarsfeld and Mus t ata [@L azM us])vast ly genera liz ed Oko unk o v’s id eas [@ KavKh o] , a n d  in p a r ti cul ar  construct e d  su ch $\ ti lde{ \Delta} $ (called *Newton- O kou nkov bodies*orsome t i me s s i mp l y * Ok o unk o v  bodies*) evenwithout pr es e nc e of any g r oup  a ction.In thesetti n g studi ed by Oko unkov, th emaxi m u m p ossible (r eal) dim ension of the N e wt on-Ok oun kov bo dy  $\ tilde {\Delt a }$is th e tran sc endenc e deg re e of ${{ \mathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ wher e $U$is amax imal unip ote n t s ubgroup o f $G $; when th ere  is  no g rou p  acti on ( a sint he se ttin g  studiedi n[@L a z Mu s; @KavKho] ) w e h ave $ \di m _{{{\m athb b{R}}}}(\tilde{\D e lta}) = \dim_{ {{\m a t hbb {C} } }}(X ). $ Hence one in ter pr e t ation of  t he resultsof Okoun ko v , Laz arsfel d-Must ata and K av e h-Khov ansk iiis that t her e* is* a c on ve x  geome tric /c ombina torial obje c t  of ‘max
ähler polarization_agree with_the quantization coming from_a real_polarization?_The results_of_this manuscript confirms_independence of polarization_in a rather large_class of examples,_significantly_extending previously known results which were restricted to special cases such as toric varieties_and_flag varieties.

We_next_briefly_motivate the theory of Newton-Okounkov_bodies. The famous Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg and_Kirwan convexity_theorems link equivariant symplectic and algebraic geometry to_the_combinatorics of polytopes._In the case of a toric variety $X$, the_combinatorics of its moment map polytope_$\Delta$ fully encodes_the_geometry_of $X$, but this_fails in the general case. In_his influential work, Okounkov constructed (circa_roughly 1996), for an (irreducible) projective variety_$X \subseteq {\mathbb{P}}(V)$ equipped with an_action of a reductive algebraic_group $G$,_a convex body $\tilde{\Delta}$ and_a natural projection_from $\tilde{\Delta}$_to the moment_polytope $\Delta$ of $X$. Moreover, the_volumes of the_fibers of this projection encode the_asymptotics_of the multiplicities_of_the_irreducible representations_appearing in the_homogeneous_coordinate ring_of_$X$, or in other words, the_Duistermaat-Heckman_measure [@Okounkov-BM; @Okounkov-log-concave]. Recently, Askold Khovanskii and_the third author (also_independently_Lazarsfeld and Mustata [@LazMus])_vastly generalized Okounkov’s ideas [@KavKho],_and in particular constructed such $\tilde{\Delta}$_(called *Newton-Okounkov_bodies* or_sometimes simply *Okounkov bodies*) even without presence of any group action._In the setting studied by Okounkov,_the maximum possible (real)_dimension of_the_Newton-Okounkov body $\tilde{\Delta}$_is_the transcendence_degree of ${{\mathbb{C}}}(X)^U$ where $U$ is a_maximal unipotent_subgroup of $G$; when there is_no group action (as_in_the setting studied in [@LazMus; @KavKho])_we have $\dim_{{{\mathbb{R}}}}(\tilde{\Delta}) = \dim_{{{\mathbb{C}}}}(X).$ Hence_one interpretation of the results_of_Okounkov,_Lazarsfeld-Mustata and Kaveh-Khovanskii is that_there *is* a convex geometric/combinatorial object_of ‘max