1})^{-1}.$$ We need to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$ for all $m\in M^{(n)}$. Let us first show that the map $m\mapsto\varphi_w(m)$ is a homomorphism on $M^{(n)}$. To see it, for $m, m'\in M^{(n)}$ we have $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(mm',\sigma_r(m,m')){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1},\sigma_r(m,m')\varphi_w(mm')).\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, we have $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmw^{-1},\varphi_w(m))(wm'w^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})
\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(m,m')
\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')),\end{aligned}$$ where the last equality follows because $\sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})=\sigma_r(m,m')$ by the block-compatibility of $\sigma_r$. Hence by comparing those two, one obtains $\varphi_w(mm')=\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')$. Therefore to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$, it suffices to show it for the elmenets of the form $$\label{E:form_of_m}
m={\operatorname{diag}}(I_{r_1},\dots,I_{r_{i-1}},g_i,I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ for $g_i\in{\operatorname{GL}}_{r_i}^{(n)}$.

Then one can rewrite $\
1})^{-1}.$$ We need to show $ \varphi_w(m)=1 $ for all $ m\in M^{(n)}$. Let us first picture that the function $ m\mapsto\varphi_w(m)$ is a homomorphism on $ M^{(n)}$. To see it, for $ m, m'\in M^{(n)}$ we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(mm',\sigma_r(m, m')){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\ 
 & =( wmm'w^{-1},\sigma_r(m, m')\varphi_w(mm')).\end{aligned}$$ On the early hand, we receive $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\ 
 & =( wmw^{-1},\varphi_w(m))(wm'w^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\ 
 & =( wmm'w^{-1 }, \sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1 }) 
 \varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m'))\\ 
 & =( wmm'w^{-1 }, \sigma_r(m, m') 
 \varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')),\end{aligned}$$ where the last equality follows because $ \sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})=\sigma_r(m, m')$ by the blocking - compatibility of $ \sigma_r$. Hence by comparing those two, one obtain $ \varphi_w(mm')=\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')$. Therefore to show $ \varphi_w(m)=1 $, it suffice to show it for the elmenets of the form $ $ \label{E: form_of_m } 
 m={\operatorname{diag}}(I_{r_1},\dots, I_{r_{i-1}},g_i, I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ for $ g_i\in{\operatorname{GL}}_{r_i}^{(n)}$. 

 Then one can rewrite $ \
1})^{-1}.$$ We need to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$ fur all $m\in M^{(n)}$. Lgt us ficst shos that tfe map $m\mapsto\varphi_w(m)$ is a iomonorphusm on $M^{(n)}$. To see it, fof $m, m'\in M^{(j)}$ we havw $$\bejin{aligned}
{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathny{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mafmbf{s}}(w)(kn',\sigma_r(m,m')){\mathbn{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1},\sigmd_r(m,m')\varphi_w(mm')).\etd{xlngned}$$ On the other hand, we have $$\begig{alignec}
{\mwthbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbs{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\msehbf{a}}(w)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmw^{-1},\varlhi_w(m))(wm'x^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sogma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})
\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(l'))\\
&=(wmm'a^{-1}, \sigma_r(m,m')
\varphi_w(m)\garphi_w(m')),\end{qliggwd}$$ where the last equality follows because $\sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})=\sigma_r(m,m')$ bh the block-compqtubiphty of $\sigme_r$. Henbe by comparikb thosa two, ome obtains $\varihi_w(mk')=\vaephi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')$. Therefmre to show $\varphi_r(m)=1$, it sufxiees to show it for thw wlmengts ox thd fofm $$\mauel{S:form_ov_m}
m={\kperatornaje{diag}}(I_{r_1},\dotw,I_{r_{i-1}},g_i,I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ fpr $t_i\in{\operatornzme{GL}}_{r_y}^{(n)}$.

Ehen one can rewrite $\
1})^{-1}.$$ We need to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$ for M^{(n)}$. us first that the map $M^{(n)}$. see it, for m'\in M^{(n)}$ we $$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(mm',\sigma_r(m,m')){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\ &=(wmm'w^{-1},\sigma_r(m,m')\varphi_w(mm')).\end{aligned}$$ On the other we have $$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\ &=(wmw^{-1},\varphi_w(m))(wm'w^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\ &=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1}) \varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m'))\\ &=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(m,m') \varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')),\end{aligned}$$ where the equality follows because $\sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})=\sigma_r(m,m')$ by the block-compatibility of $\sigma_r$. Hence by comparing those one $\varphi_w(mm')=\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')$. to $\varphi_w(m)=1$, it suffices to show it for the elmenets of the form $$\label{E:form_of_m} m={\operatorname{diag}}(I_{r_1},\dots,I_{r_{i-1}},g_i,I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ for Then one can rewrite $\
1})^{-1}.$$ We need to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$ for alL $m\in M^{(n)}$. Let uS firsT shOw tHaT the Map $m\Mapsto\varphi_w(m)$ IS a hoMomorphism on $M^{(n)}$. To see it, fOr $m, m'\iN M^{(N)}$ We haVE $$\bEgin{aLigned}
{\mAThBF{S}}(w)(m,1)(M',1){\mAtHbf{S}}(w)^{-1}&={\MAtHbf{s}}(w)(Mm',\sIgma_r(m,m')){\Mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmM'w^{-1},\sIgMa_r(m,m')\varphi_w(MM')).\eNd{aligned}$$ ON thE other hand, we HavE $$\begin{AlIgnED}
{\mathBf{s}}(W)(m,1)(m',1){\maThbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\MAthbf{s}}(W)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(W)^{-1}{\mAThbf{s}}(w)(M',1){\Mathbf{s}}(W)^{-1}\\
&=(WMw^{-1},\VarpHi_w(m))(wm'w^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmM'W^{-1}, \sIGma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})
\varpHi_w(m)\vaRpHI_w(M'))\\
&=(WMm'w^{-1}, \SigMa_r(m,m')
\varphI_w(M)\varpHI_w(m')),\end{aLIgNED}$$ WheRE the last equalIty follows bECauSe $\sigmA_r(Wmw^{-1},WM'w^{-1})=\sigmA_r(m,m')$ bY tHE blOck-compatibIlitY of $\sigma_r$. hence bY CompariNG those tWo, one oBtaIns $\VarpHI_w(Mm')=\VarPhI_W(m)\vARpHi_w(M')$. theRefore to ShOw $\VarphI_w(m)=1$, iT SUFFiceS to Show It for The elmenets of The Form $$\LAbeL{E:forM_of_m}
m={\OperAtOrnamE{diag}}(I_{R_1},\dots,i_{r_{I-1}},g_i,I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ foR $g_i\iN{\operatorNamE{Gl}}_{r_i}^{(N)}$.

THen onE Can rewRitE $\
1})^{-1}.$$ We need to sho w $\varphi _w(m) =1$  fo rall$m\i n M^{(n)}$. Le t  usfirst show that the ma p $m\ ma p sto\ v ar phi_w (m)$ is ah o mom or ph ism  o n  $ M^{(n )}$ . To se e it, for$m,  m '\in M^{(n)} $  w e have $$\ beg in{aligned}{\m athbf{ s} }(w ) (m,1) (m' ,1){\ mathbf { s}}(w) ^{-1}&={\ ma t hbf{s} } (w)(mm' , \ si gma_ r(m,m')){\mathbf{ s }} ( w)^{-1}\\
&=(w mm'w^{ -1 } ,\ s i gma _r( m,m')\varp hi _w(mm ' )).\end { al i g n ed} $ $ On the othe r hand, weh ave  $$\be gi n{a l igned} 
{\ma th b f{s }}(w)(m,1)( m',1 ){\mathbf {s}}(w ) ^{-1}&= { \mathbf {s}}(w )(m ,1) {\ma t hb f{ s}} (w ) ^{- 1 }{ \ma t hbf {s}}(w)( m' ,1 ){\ma thbf { s } } (w)^ {-1 }\\&=(wm w^{-1},\varph i_w (m)) ( wm' w^{-1 },\va rphi _w (m')) \\
&=( wmm'w ^{ -1}, \sigma_r(w mw^{ -1},wm'w^ {-1 }) 
\v ar phi_w ( m)\var phi _w( m'))\\&=(wmm' w ^{- 1} , \ si gma_r(m,m')
\varph i_ w ( m) \varphi_ w(m')) , \e nd { aligned} $$  wh eret h e las t eq u al ity foll ows be c au se  $\sigm a_ r(wmw^ {- 1}, wm' w^{-1 } )=\s igma_r (m,m')$by th e  block-compati b ility of $\si g ma _ r $. Henc e b y comparing  tho s e tw o, o n eobt a ins $ \varp hi _ w( m m')=\varphi_w(m)\va rp hi_w(m ')$.Therefore toshow $\var p h i _w(m)=1$ , it su f fices to showit fo r the elme n ets of t he fo rm $$\la bel{E:for m _ of_m}
m= {\o per ato rna m e {d iag}}(I_{r_1} , \ dots ,I _{r_{i- 1}} ,g_i,I_ {r_ {i+ 1}} ,\d ot s, I_{r_k })$$ for  $ g_ i\ in {\o perat o rname{GL }} _{r _i }^{ (n)}$ . 

Then  onecanre wr i te$\
1})^{-1}.$$ We_need to_show $\varphi_w(m)=1$ for all_$m\in M^{(n)}$._Let_us first_show_that the map_$m\mapsto\varphi_w(m)$ is a_homomorphism on $M^{(n)}$. To_see it, for_$m,_m'\in M^{(n)}$ we have $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(mm',\sigma_r(m,m')){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1},\sigma_r(m,m')\varphi_w(mm')).\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, we have $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}&={\mathbf{s}}(w)(m,1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}{\mathbf{s}}(w)(m',1){\mathbf{s}}(w)^{-1}\\
&=(wmw^{-1},\varphi_w(m))(wm'w^{-1},\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})
\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m'))\\
&=(wmm'w^{-1}, \sigma_r(m,m')
\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')),\end{aligned}$$_where_the last_equality_follows_because $\sigma_r(wmw^{-1},wm'w^{-1})=\sigma_r(m,m')$ by the block-compatibility_of $\sigma_r$. Hence by comparing_those two,_one obtains $\varphi_w(mm')=\varphi_w(m)\varphi_w(m')$. Therefore to show $\varphi_w(m)=1$, it_suffices_to show it_for the elmenets of the form $$\label{E:form_of_m}
m={\operatorname{diag}}(I_{r_1},\dots,I_{r_{i-1}},g_i,I_{r_{i+1}},\dots, I_{r_k})$$ for_$g_i\in{\operatorname{GL}}_{r_i}^{(n)}$.

Then one can rewrite $\