’ offsets as in Figure \[fig:example2\]. Based on step 5 from the algorithm, we predict the DOA of chunk from $On_3$ to $Off_2$ using *doa2* where the associated DOA is the DOA of $E_2$. Lastly we deduce classes of the events $E_1, E_2$ and $E_3$. According to the step 6 form the algorithm, we predict class of $E_1$ based on the chunk from $On_1$ to $On_2$, predict the class of $E_2$ based on chunks from $Off_1$ to $On_3$ and from $Off_2$ to $Off_3$. Finally, we predict the class of $E_3$ based on the chunk from $On_3$ to $Off_2$. If the predicted class of $E_3$ is the same as the class of $E_2$ then we predict it to be the second most probable class from the *class* network.

![The plot visualising the predicted number of active sources for some randomly selected recording.[]{data-label="fig:noas"}](noas_final.png){width="\columnwidth"}

![image](example_final.png){width="\textwidth"}

Results {#sec:results}
=======

We evaluate our results on TAU Spatial Sound Events 2019 - Ambisonic dataset. This dataset constitutes of two parts: the development and evaluation sets. The development part consists of 400 recordings with predefined 4-fold cross-validation and the evaluation part consists of 100 recordings. The results from this section relate to our submission `Kapka_SRPOL_task3_2`.

Development phase {#ssec:develop}
-----------------

As for the development part, we used 2 splits out of 4 for training for every fold using the suggested cross-validation even though validation splits do not influence the training process.

We show in Table \[tab:results\] the averaged metrics from all folds for our setting and metrics for the baseline [@Adavanne2019_DCASE]. In order to demonstrate the variance among folds, we present in Table \[tab:test\_splits\] the detailed results on the test splits from each fold. The development set provides the distinction for the files where there is up to 1 active sound source at once (ov1) and where there are up to 2 (ov2
’ offsets as in Figure \[fig: example2\ ]. Based on step 5 from the algorithm, we predict the DOA of ball from $ On_3 $ to $ Off_2 $ use * doa2 * where the associated DOA is the DOA of $ E_2$. Lastly we deduce class of the event $ E_1, E_2 $ and $ E_3$. According to the step 6 shape the algorithm, we bode class of $ E_1 $ based on the chunk from $ On_1 $ to $ On_2 $, predict the class of $ E_2 $ free-base on chunks from $ Off_1 $ to $ On_3 $ and from $ Off_2 $ to $ Off_3$. Finally, we bode the class of $ E_3 $ based on the ball from $ On_3 $ to $ Off_2$. If the predicted course of $ E_3 $ is the like as the class of $ E_2 $ then we predict it to be the second most probable class from the * course * network. 

! [ The plot visualising the predict number of active beginning for some randomly selected recording.[]{data - label="fig: noas"}](noas_final.png){width="\columnwidth " } 

! [ image](example_final.png){width="\textwidth " } 

 Results { # sec: results } 
 = = = = = = = 

 We evaluate our results on TAU Spatial Sound Events 2019 - Ambisonic dataset. This dataset form of two parts: the development and evaluation sets. The development part consists of 400 recordings with predefined 4 - fold cross - validation and the evaluation part consists of 100 recordings. The results from this section relate to our submission 'Kapka_SRPOL_task3_2 `. 

 Development phase { # ssec: develop } 
 ----------------- 

 As for the growth part, we used 2 split out of 4 for education for every flock using the suggested hybridization - validation even though validation splits do not influence the education process. 

 We show in Table \[tab: results\ ] the averaged metrics from all folds for our setting and metrics for the baseline [ @Adavanne2019_DCASE ]. In order to demonstrate the variance among folds, we award in Table \[tab: test\_splits\ ] the detailed result on the test splits from each fold. The growth set provides the distinction for the file where there is up to 1 active sound source at once (ov1) and where there are up to 2 (ov2
’ ofvsets as in Figure \[fig:exxmple2\]. Based on step 5 fcom the algoritfm, we predict the DOA of chuik feom $Ob_3$ to $Off_2$ using *doa2* whefe the asdociated DOA us the DOA of $E_2$. Lastly ws dedbcx classes of thg events $E_1, E_2$ and $E_3$. Accorditg tl the step 6 form the algorithm, we pwedict vlwss of $E_1$ based on uhe chuhk from $On_1$ to $On_2$, predict the class of $E_2$ besed on chunks grom $Off_1$ to $On_3$ and from $Ofv_2$ to $Off_3$. Finally, we prfdict the coass if $E_3$ based ov the chunk from $On_3$ to $Off_2$. If the predicted class of $D_3$ is che same as tye fnass of $E_2$ tien we predict it bp be tve secomd most probabke rlasw from the *class* netwmrk.

![The plot visualysing the pxedicted number of acrice soorces for womd rznvommy selfctxd recordinf.[]{data-label="fug:noas"}](noas_final.png){wodey="\columnwidth"}

![ijage](exwm[le_final.png){width="\textwidth"}

Results {#sec:resllts}
=======

Se evaluate our results on TAU Spatial Sound Events 2019 - Ambisonic dataset. This dataset constitutes of twm parvs: tht eevelupmfnt and evaluation sets. The development part sknxixts of 400 recordlngs with predefinrd 4-fpjd cross-validxtion chd the evaluation pagt consysts if 100 recorqingx. The results from this secrion relate no oyr submission `Kapkc_SRPOL_task3_2`.

Derelopmgnt phsse {#ssec:develop}
-----------------

As for tke devslopment pagt, we uses 2 splits out of 4 fog trdining for every fold usind the sugjesteb cross-vxlidstion qven thougj vallgation splits do nlt inyluenwe the tralning process.

We show in Table \[teu:results\] the svaraced metrncs frpm all folds sor our settiny and mecrics wor the baaeline [@Edavanne2019_DCASQ]. In order to femonstrate vhe variagce qmont folds, de present in Yable \[tab:neft\_spoits\] the detailed vesuljs on the test spoitw from each folc. Tfe qenelppiant set provhdes thd distknction for ghe giles where there is up fo 1 active sound spuvce at onxe (ov1) anq where there are up to 2 (ov2
’ offsets as in Figure \[fig:example2\]. Based 5 the algorithm, predict the DOA $Off_2$ *doa2* where the DOA is the of $E_2$. Lastly we deduce classes the events $E_1, E_2$ and $E_3$. According to the step 6 form the we predict class of $E_1$ based on the chunk from $On_1$ to $On_2$, the of based chunks from $Off_1$ to $On_3$ and from $Off_2$ to $Off_3$. Finally, we predict the class of based on the chunk from $On_3$ to $Off_2$. the predicted class of is the same as the of then we it be second most probable from the *class* network. ![The plot visualising the predicted number of active sources for some randomly selected ![image](example_final.png){width="\textwidth"} Results We evaluate results TAU Sound Events 2019 dataset. This dataset constitutes of two and evaluation sets. The development part consists of recordings with 4-fold cross-validation and the evaluation part of 100 recordings. The results from this section to our submission `Kapka_SRPOL_task3_2`. Development phase {#ssec:develop} ----------------- As for the development part, we used out of 4 for for every fold the cross-validation though splits do influence the training process. We show in Table \[tab:results\] the averaged from all folds for our setting and metrics for the In to demonstrate the among folds, we present Table the detailed results on splits each set the for the files where is up to 1 active source at once (ov1) to 2 (ov2
’ offsets as in Figure \[fig:exampLe2\]. Based on sTep 5 frOm tHe aLgOritHm, we Predict the DOA oF ChunK from $On_3$ to $Off_2$ using *doa2* whEre thE aSSociATeD DOA iS the DOA OF $E_2$. lAStlY wE dEduCe CLaSses oF thE events $e_1, E_2$ and $E_3$. AccoRdiNg To the step 6 forM ThE algorithm, We pRedict class oF $E_1$ bAsed on ThE chUNk froM $On_1$ To $On_2$, pRedict THe clasS of $E_2$ based On CHunks fROm $Off_1$ to $oN_3$ AnD froM $Off_2$ to $Off_3$. Finally, wE PrEDict the class of $e_3$ based On THe CHUnk FroM $On_3$ to $Off_2$. If ThE predICted claSS oF $e_3$ IS thE Same as the clasS of $E_2$ then we pREdiCt it to Be The SEcond mOst prObABle Class from thE *claSs* network.

![the ploT VisualiSIng the pRedictEd nUmbEr of ACtIvE soUrCEs fOR sOme RAndOmly seleCtEd RecorDing.[]{DATA-LabeL="fiG:noaS"}](noas_Final.png){width="\ColUmnwIDth"}

![Image](ExampLe_fiNaL.png){wIdth="\teXtwidTh"}

results {#sec:resulTs}
=======

We Evaluate oUr rEsUltS oN TAU SPAtial SOunD EvEnts 2019 - AmbIsonic dATasEt. tHIS dAtaset constitutes oF tWO PaRts: the deVelopmENt AnD EvaluatiOn SetS. The DEVelopMent PArT consistS of 400 recORdInGs with pReDefineD 4-fOld CroSs-valIDatiOn and tHe evaluaTion pARt consists of 100 reCOrdings. The resULtS FRoM This SecTion relate tO our SUbmiSsioN `kaPka_srPOL_tAsk3_2`.

DeVeLOpMEnt phase {#ssec:develop}
-----------------

as For the DevelOpment part, we uSed 2 splits oUT OF 4 for traiNing FOr EVery fold using tHe sugGested crosS-ValidatiOn eveN though vAlidation SPLits do noT inFluEncE thE TRaIning process.

WE SHow iN TAble \[tab:ResUlts\] the AveRagEd mEtrIcS from all fOlds for oUr SeTtInG anD metrICs for the BaSelInE [@AdAvannE2019_dCASE]. IN ordeR to dEmOnSTraTe the vaRIaNCE amoNg FoLds, wE prEsEnt in tablE \[Tab:Test\_splIts\] the detAilED resUlTs On the teSt splits from eAcH fold. The deVeLopMent seT PRovides tHe distinction for the fileS Where thEre Is up tO 1 actIve sound sOurCe at onCe (oV1) And wheRe therE are uP tO 2 (ov2
’ offsets as in Figure \[f ig:example 2\].Bas edon  ste p 5from the algor i thm,  we predict the DOA of  chun kf rom$ On _3$ t o $Off_ 2 $u s ing  * do a2*  w h er e the  as sociate d DOA is t heDO A of $E_2$.L as tly we ded uce  classes ofthe  event s$E_ 1 , E_2 $ a nd $E _3$. A c cordin g to thest e p 6 fo r m the a l g or ithm , we predict clas s  o f  $E_1$ based o n thech u nk f rom  $O n_1$ to $O n_ 2$, p r edict t h ec l a sso f $E_2$ based  on chunksf rom  $Off_ 1$  to $On_3$  andfr o m $ Off_2$ to $ Off_ 3$. Final ly, we predict the cla ss of$E_ 3$base d  o nthe  c h unk fr om$ On_ 3$ to $O ff _2 $. If  the p r e dict edclas s of$E_3$ is thesam e as the  clas s of$E_2 $thenwe pre dictit  to be the seco nd m ost proba ble  c las sfromt he *cl ass * n etwork. 

![The plo tv i s ua lising the predict ed n um ber of a ctives ou rc e s for so me  ra ndom l y  sele cted re cording. []{dat a -l ab el="fig :n oas"}] (n oas _fi nal.p n g){w idth=" \columnw idth" } 

![image](exa m ple_final.png ) {w i d th = "\te xtw idth"}

Res ults {#se c:re s ul ts} ===== ==

W ee va l uate our results on  T AU Spa tialSound Events2019 - Amb i s o nic data set. Th i s dataset cons titut es of twop arts: th e dev elopment  and eval u a tion set s.The  de vel o p me nt part consi s t s of  4 00 reco rdi ngs wit h p red efi ned  4 -fold cro ss-valid at io nan d t he ev a luationpa rtco nsi sts o f  100 r ecord ings .Th e  re sults f r om t hisse ct ionrel at e toours ubm ission`Kapka_SR POL _ task 3_ 2` .

Deve lopment phase  { #ssec:deve lo p}------ - - -------- -

As for the developme n t part,  we  used  2 s plits out  of  4 for  tr a iningfor ev ery f ol d u s i ng th e su gge st ed cross-v a l ida tionev en t hough v alidation splits d o  no t influence t hetrai n i ng  pr o ce s s.
W e  sh o w  in Table \[tab :results\]  t h eaveraged m e tri cs  from a ll fold s for our set ting andmetrics f or  the b ase line [@Ada vanne201 9_DCASE]. In or d er  to d emo nstrat ethe  vari ance a m ong  fold s, wepr esentin Ta bl e \[tab: test\_splits\] the deta iled r esult s o n the tes t s p lit s from ea ch f old. The d eve lop mentset provi dest he  di s tinct ionf or the fi l es  wh e r ethere is up t o  1activ e s o und so urce  at once (ov1) an d  where there a re u p to2 ( o v2
’ offsets_as in_Figure \[fig:example2\]. Based on_step 5_from_the algorithm,_we_predict the DOA_of chunk from_$On_3$ to $Off_2$ using_*doa2* where the_associated_DOA is the DOA of $E_2$. Lastly we deduce classes of the events $E_1,_E_2$_and $E_3$._According_to_the step 6 form the_algorithm, we predict class of_$E_1$ based_on the chunk from $On_1$ to $On_2$, predict_the_class of $E_2$_based on chunks from $Off_1$ to $On_3$ and from_$Off_2$ to $Off_3$. Finally, we predict_the class of_$E_3$_based_on the chunk from_$On_3$ to $Off_2$. If the predicted_class of $E_3$ is the same_as the class of $E_2$ then we_predict it to be the second_most probable class from the_*class* network.

![The_plot visualising the predicted number_of active sources_for some_randomly selected recording.[]{data-label="fig:noas"}](noas_final.png){width="\columnwidth"}

![image](example_final.png){width="\textwidth"}

Results_{#sec:results}
=======

We evaluate our results on TAU_Spatial Sound Events_2019 - Ambisonic dataset. This dataset_constitutes_of two parts:_the_development_and evaluation_sets. The development_part_consists of_400_recordings with predefined 4-fold cross-validation and_the_evaluation part consists of 100 recordings. The_results from this section_relate_to our submission `Kapka_SRPOL_task3_2`.

Development_phase {#ssec:develop}
-----------------

As for the development_part, we used 2 splits out_of 4_for training_for every fold using the suggested cross-validation even though validation splits_do not influence the training process.

We_show in Table \[tab:results\]_the averaged_metrics_from all folds_for_our setting_and metrics for the baseline [@Adavanne2019_DCASE]. In_order to_demonstrate the variance among folds, we_present in Table \[tab:test\_splits\]_the_detailed results on the test splits_from each fold. The development set_provides the distinction for the_files_where_there is up to 1_active sound source at once (ov1)_and where there_are up to 2 (ov2