 perform one of the protocols with this probability. There will always be a protocol which is at least as good as this. Monotonicity is obvious (additional quantum communication can only help), and continuity follows from monotonicity, and the existence of the probabilistic protocol.

The probabilistic protocol can be drawn as a straight line between the points $(\ER,\IF(\ER))$ and $(\EF,\IF(\EF))$. There may however exist a protocol which has a lower $\IFP$ than this straight line, i.e. the curve $\IFP$ satisfies I+(Q-)

Let us now look at extraction processes. The idea is that we draw both local information (pure separable states), and distill singlets. The singlets allow one to perform teleportations, so that we are in fact, extracting the potential to use a quantum channel. We can also consider the case where we use the quantum channel to assist in the information extraction process. We can therefore write the extractable information $\IDP$ as a function of $Q$. When $Q$ is positive, we distill singlets at the same time as drawing information, and when $Q$ is negative, we are using the quantum channel $Q$ times to assist in the extraction (see also Figure \[generic\]).

There appear to be at least three special points on the curve. The first, is the point $\ID\equiv\ID(0)$. This was considered in [@OHHH2001] when we draw maximal local information without the aid of a quantum channel. Another special point is the usual entanglement distillation procedure $\IG=\ID(\ED)$. The quantity $\IG$ is the amount of local information extractable from the “garbage” left over from distillation. $\IG$ can be negative as information may need to be added to the system in order to distill all the available entanglement. Finally, $I=\ID(\ER)$ is the point where we use the quantum channel enough times that we can extract all the available information. This is the same number of times that the quantum channel is needed to prepare the state without any information surplus since both procedures are now reversible.

Just as with the formation curve, $\IDP$ is convex, continuous and monotonic. For $Q\geq 0$ there is an upper bound on the extraction curve due to the classical/quantum complementarity of [@compl]. I+Q \[eq:compl\] It arises because one bit of local information can be drawn from each distilled singlet
perform one of the protocols with this probability. There will always be a protocol which is at least as beneficial as this. Monotonicity is obvious (extra quantum communication can only help), and continuity follow from monotonicity, and the universe of the probabilistic protocol. 

 The probabilistic protocol can be drawn as a straight tune between the item $ (\ER,\IF(\ER))$ and $ (\EF,\IF(\EF))$. There may however exist a protocol which has a broken $ \IFP$ than this straight line, i.e. the bend $ \IFP$ satisfies I+(Q-) 

 Let us now attend at extraction processes. The idea is that we draw both local information (pure dissociable states), and distill singlets. The singlet allow one to perform teleportations, so that we are in fact, extracting the potential to practice a quantum channel. We can besides consider the case where we use the quantum channel to serve in the information extraction process. We can therefore write the extractable data $ \IDP$ as a affair of $ Q$. When $ Q$ is positive, we distill singlets at the same time as drawing information, and when $ Q$ is negative, we are using the quantum groove $ Q$ times to assist in the origin (examine besides Figure \[generic\ ]). 

 There appear to be at least three special points on the curve. The first, is the point $ \ID\equiv\ID(0)$. This was considered in [ @OHHH2001 ] when we draw maximal local data without the aid of a quantum channel. Another special point is the usual entanglement distillation procedure $ \IG=\ID(\ED)$. The quantity $ \IG$ is the amount of local information extractable from the “ garbage ” bequeath over from distillate. $ \IG$ can be damaging as information may need to be added to the system in holy order to distill all the available entanglement. Finally, $ I=\ID(\ER)$ is the point where we use the quantum channel enough times that we can extract all the available data. This is the same number of times that the quantum channel is needed to fix the state without any data surplus since both procedures are now reversible. 

 Just as with the geological formation curve, $ \IDP$ is convex, continuous and monotonic. For $ Q\geq 0 $ there is an upper bound on the extraction bend due to the classical / quantum complementarity of [ @compl ]. I+Q \[eq: compl\ ] It arises because one bit of local information can be drawn from each distilled singlet
 pegform one of the protocous with this probabilivy. Thers will auways be a protocol which is ar leawt as good as this. Monutonicity is obviius (edditional quantnj commukncatikk can inly help), and gontinuity xollows from mmnutlnicity, and the existence of the prjbabilixtlc protocol.

The pronwbiljstic protocol can be drawn as a sfraight line between the points $(\ER,\IF(\ER))$ and $(\EF,\IV(\EF))$. Hhere may however fxist a projkcoj which has a lower $\IFP$ than this sjraight line, i.e. the curve $\IFP$ sagisfizs I+(Q-)

Let us niw pmok at extrection processes. Tmv idea hs that we draw both kocel ibformation (pure separeble states), and distyll singlata. The singlets alooq one to [erfuem geltpoctafions, do vhat we are in fact, exrracting the potentoaj to use a quahtum cragnel. We can also consider the case whert we hse the quantum channel to assist in the inflrmation qxtraction process. We can therefore write the extsactauld iunjfnahion $\IDP$ as a function of $Q$. When $Q$ is positivq, wt dpstill singlets ab the same time as dgaeyng informatiun, and whsn $Q$ is negative, wf are ufing rhe quanttm cnannel $Q$ times to assist in the extractpon (wee also Figure \[geueric\]).

There a'pear jo be st least three special 'oints on the curge. The fidrt, is the point $\KD\eauhv\ID(0)$. This was considered ig [@OHHH2001] whxn we draw mxximsl locwl informahion without the aid of w quautum whannel. Anlther special point is the usual entanglement dhstpllation 'rocedmre $\IG=\ID(\ED)$. The zuantity $\IG$ is the amjunt uf local ihformatmon extractafle from the “cwrbage” left mver froi diwtiloation. $\KE$ can be negatove as inyjrmarion may need to bc addgd to the system nu irder to distilk aul ehv atailafne entanglemant. Winxkly, $I=\KD(\ER)$ is the ooiny where we use the qganthm channel enough yiies that we can qxtract all tne available inforlatioi. This is tne fame number of times that the suantum cjankel is needed to irepwre the stcte without any information surplus sincx both procedures are niw reversible.

Just ax with the fprmatyon curve, $\IDP$ is convex, contibuous and monotonlc. For $Q\geq 0$ there is zn uppar boknd on the extraction curve due to the classical/quantum complementarity od [@compl]. I+Q \[eq:compl\] It srisev yeccuse onq biv uf local informanion can be drawn from each distmlled singnec
perform one of the protocols with this will be a which is at Monotonicity obvious (additional quantum can only help), continuity follows from monotonicity, and the of the probabilistic protocol. The probabilistic protocol can be drawn as a straight between the points $(\ER,\IF(\ER))$ and $(\EF,\IF(\EF))$. There may however exist a protocol which a $\IFP$ this line, i.e. the curve $\IFP$ satisfies I+(Q-) Let us now look at extraction processes. The idea that we draw both local information (pure separable and distill singlets. The allow one to perform teleportations, that are in extracting potential use a quantum We can also consider the case where we use the quantum channel to assist in the information process. We write the information as function of $Q$. is positive, we distill singlets at as drawing information, and when $Q$ is negative, are using quantum channel $Q$ times to assist the extraction (see also Figure \[generic\]). There appear be at least three special points on the curve. The first, is the point $\ID\equiv\ID(0)$. considered in [@OHHH2001] when draw maximal local without aid a channel. Another point is the usual entanglement distillation procedure $\IG=\ID(\ED)$. The quantity $\IG$ the amount of local information extractable from the “garbage” left distillation. can be negative information may need to added the system in order all available is point we use the quantum enough times that we can all the available information. of times that the quantum channel is needed prepare the state without any information surplus both procedures are now reversible. Just as with the formation curve, $\IDP$ convex, continuous For $Q\geq 0$ there is an upper bound the extraction curve due the classical/quantum complementarity of [@compl]. I+Q \[eq:compl\] It arises one of local can be drawn each distilled singlet
 perform one of the protocols wIth this proBabilIty. theRe Will AlwaYs be a protocol wHIch iS at least as good as this. MoNotonIcITy is OBvIous (aDditionAL qUANtuM cOmMunIcATiOn can OnlY help), anD continuitY foLlOws from monotONiCity, and the ExiStence of the pRobAbilisTiC prOTocol.

the ProbaBilistIC protoCol can be dRaWN as a stRAight liNE BeTweeN the points $(\ER,\IF(\ER))$ aND $(\Ef,\iF(\EF))$. There may hoWever eXiST a PROtoCol Which has a lOwEr $\IFP$ THan this STrAIGHt lINe, i.e. the curve $\IfP$ satisfies i+(q-)

LeT us now LoOk aT ExtracTion pRoCEssEs. The idea is That We draw botH local INformatIOn (pure sEparabLe sTatEs), anD DiStIll SiNGleTS. THe sINglEts allow OnE tO perfOrm tELEPOrtaTioNs, so That wE are in fact, extRacTing THe pOtentIal to Use a QuAntum ChanneL. We caN aLso consider the cAse wHere we use The QuAntUm ChannEL to assIst In tHe inforMation eXTraCtION PrOcess. We can thereforE wRITe The extraCtable INfOrMAtion $\IDP$ As A fuNctiON Of $Q$. WhEn $Q$ iS PoSitive, we DistilL SiNgLets at tHe Same tiMe As dRawIng inFOrmaTion, anD when $Q$ is NegatIVe, we are using thE Quantum channeL $q$ tIMEs TO assIst In the extracTion (SEe alSo FiGUrE \[geNEric\]).

THere aPpEAr TO be at least three specIaL pointS on thE curve. The firsT, is the poinT $\id\Equiv\ID(0)$. THis wAS cONsidered in [@OHHH2001] When wE draw maximAL local inFormaTion withOut the aid OF A quantum ChaNneL. AnOthER SpEcial point is tHE UsuaL eNtangleMenT distilLatIon ProCedUrE $\IG=\ID(\ED)$. ThE quantitY $\Ig$ iS tHe AmoUnt of LOcal infoRmAtiOn ExtRactaBLe from The “gaRbagE” lEfT OveR from diSTiLLAtioN. $\Ig$ cAn be NegAtIve as InfoRMatIon may nEed to be adDed TO the SyStEm in ordEr to distill alL tHe availablE eNtaNglemeNT. finally, $I=\iD(\ER)$ is the point where we usE The quanTum ChannEl enOugh times ThaT we can ExtRAct all The avaIlablE iNfoRMAtion. tHIs Is tHe Same number OF TimEs thaT tHe quAntum chAnnel is needed to prePAre The state withoUt aNy inFORmAtiON sURplUs SIncE BOth procedures arE now reversIbLE.

JUst as with tHE foRmAtion cuRve, $\IDP$ iS convEX, continUous and moNotonic. FoR $Q\Geq 0$ tHERe iS an upper boUnd on the ExtractioN Curve DUe To the ClaSsical/QuAntUm comPlemenTAriTy of [@cOmpl]. I+Q \[Eq:Compl\] IT arisEs Because oNe bit of local information Can be dRawn fRom Each distiLleD SinGlet
 perform one of the protoc ols with t his p rob abi li ty.Ther e will alwaysb e aprotocol which is at l eastas good as  this . Monot o ni c i tyis  o bvi ou s  ( addit ion al quan tum commun ica ti on can onlyh el p), and co nti nuity follow s f rom mo no ton i city,  an d the  exist e nce of  the prob ab i listic protoco l . 
Theprobabilistic pro t oc o l can be drawn  as ast r ai g h t l ine  between t he  poin t s $(\ER , \I F ( \ ER) ) $ and $(\EF,\ IF(\EF))$.T her e mayho wev e r exis t a p ro t oco l which has  a l ower $\IF P$ tha n  this s t raightline,i.e . t he c u rv e$\I FP $  sa t is fie s  I+ (Q-)

Le tus  nowlook a t extr act ionproce sses. The ide a i s th a t w e dra w bot h lo ca l inf ormati on (p ur e separable sta tes) , and dis til lsin gl ets.T he sin gle tsallow o ne to p e rfo rm t e le portations, so tha tw e  a re in fa ct, ex t ra ct i ng the p ot ent ialt o  usea qu a nt um chann el. We ca nalso co ns ider t he  ca sewhere we u se the  quantum  chan n el to assist i n  the informat i on e xt r acti onprocess. We  can ther efor e  w rit e  theextra ct a bl e  information $\IDP$  a s a fu nctio n of $Q$. Whe n $Q$ is p o s i tive, we  dis t il l  singlets at t he sa me time as drawinginfor mation,and when$ Q $ is neg ati ve,  we  ar e us ing the quant u m  cha nn el $Q$tim es to a ssi stinthe  e xtraction  (see al so  F ig ur e \ [gene r ic\]).
Th ere  a ppe ar to be atleast  thr ee  s p eci al poin t so n  the  c ur ve.The  f irst,  ist hepoint $ \ID\equiv \ID ( 0)$.  T hi s was c onsidered in[@ OHHH2001]wh enwe dra w maximallocal information witho u t the a idof aquan tum chann el.  Anoth ers pecial  point  is t he  us u a l ent a n gl eme nt  distillat i o n p roced ur e $\ IG=\ID( \ED)$. The quantit y  $\ IG$ is the am oun t of l oc ali nf o rma ti o n e x t ractable from t he “garbag e” le ft over fr o m d is tillati on. $\I G$ ca n  be neg ative asinformati on  may n eed  to be add ed to th e systemi n ord e rto di sti ll all  t heavail able e n tan gleme nt. Fi na lly, $ I=\ID (\ ER)$ isthe point where we usethe qu antum  ch annel eno ugh tim es that w e ca n extractall  th e ava ila b le in form a ti on. Thisis t h e same nu m be r o f ti mes that th e q uan tum c han n el isneed ed to prepare the state withoutanyi n for mat i on s ur plus since bot h p ro c e dures ar enow reversi ble.

Ju st as wi th the  forma tion cu r v e, $\IDP$  iscon vex, cont inu ou s  and mo no to n ic. Fo r $Q \g eq 0$therei s an u pper bound on th e ext r a ction cur ve du eto thec lass ical/quant um compleme ntarit y of  [@co mpl]. I +Q  \[eq: com pl \] It aris e s because  onebit oflo calinf ormati on c a n  be d rawn  f rom  each dis t i ll e dsi n gle t
 perform_one of_the protocols with this_probability. There_will_always be_a_protocol which is_at least as_good as this. Monotonicity_is obvious (additional_quantum_communication can only help), and continuity follows from monotonicity, and the existence of the_probabilistic_protocol.

The probabilistic_protocol_can_be drawn as a straight_line between the points $(\ER,\IF(\ER))$_and $(\EF,\IF(\EF))$._There may however exist a protocol which has_a_lower $\IFP$ than_this straight line, i.e. the curve $\IFP$ satisfies I+(Q-)

Let_us now look at extraction processes._The idea is_that_we_draw both local information_(pure separable states), and distill singlets._The singlets allow one to perform_teleportations, so that we are in fact,_extracting the potential to use a_quantum channel. We can also_consider the_case where we use the_quantum channel to_assist in_the information extraction_process. We can therefore write the_extractable information $\IDP$_as a function of $Q$. When_$Q$_is positive, we_distill_singlets_at the_same time as_drawing_information, and_when_$Q$ is negative, we are using_the_quantum channel $Q$ times to assist in_the extraction (see also_Figure_\[generic\]).

There appear to be_at least three special points_on the curve. The first, is_the point_$\ID\equiv\ID(0)$. This_was considered in [@OHHH2001] when we draw maximal local information without_the aid of a quantum channel._Another special point is_the usual_entanglement_distillation procedure $\IG=\ID(\ED)$._The_quantity $\IG$_is the amount of local information extractable_from the_“garbage” left over from distillation. $\IG$_can be negative as_information_may need to be added to_the system in order to distill_all the available entanglement. Finally,_$I=\ID(\ER)$_is_the point where we use_the quantum channel enough times that_we can extract_all the available information. This is the_same_number of times that the quantum_channel_is needed to prepare the state_without_any_information surplus since both procedures_are now reversible.

Just as with the_formation curve, $\IDP$ is convex, continuous and monotonic. For_$Q\geq 0$ there_is an upper bound on_the_extraction_curve due to the classical/quantum complementarity of [@compl]. I+Q \[eq:compl\]_It arises_because one bit_of local information can be drawn from each distilled singlet