9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & 71.8 & **78.0\                                                                        
                                                       ****************                                                                                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  : Multi-person pose estimation results on the validation and test sets of PoseTrack2017 and PoseTrack2018 datasets. Even though our model is designed to improve pose detection in scenarios involving sparsely-labeled videos, here we show that our temporal pose aggregation scheme during inference is also useful for models trained on densely labeled videos. We improve upon the state-of-the-art single-frame baselines [@xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep; @DBLP:conf/eccv/GuoTLCLW18].[]{data-label="sota_table"}

Comparison to State-of-the-Art
------------------------------

We also test the effectiveness of our temporal pose aggregation scheme, when the model is trained on the full PoseTrack [@Iqbal_CVPR2017] dataset. Table \[sota\_table\] compares our method to the most recent approaches in this area [@girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep]. These results suggest that although we designed our method to improve pose estimation when training videos are sparsely-labeled, our temporal pose aggregation scheme applied at inference is also useful for models trained on densely-labeled videos. Our PoseWarper obtains $81.2$ mAP and $77.9$ mAP on PoseTrack2017 validation and test sets respectively, and $79.7$ mAP and $78.0$ mAP on PoseTrack2018 validation and test sets respectively, thus outperforming prior single frame baselines [@girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep].

Interpreting Learned Offsets
----------------------------

Understanding what information is encoded in our learned offsets is nearly as difficult as analyzing any other CNN features [@journals/corr/ZeilerF13; @journals/corr/YosinskiCNFL15]. The main challenge comes from the high dimensionality of offsets: we are predicting $c \times k_h \times k_w$ $(x,y)$ displacements for every pixel for each of the five dilation rates $d$, where $c$ is the number of channels, and $
9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & 71.8 & * * 78.0\                                                                        
                                                        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                                                                                                     
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

  : Multi - person pose estimation results on the validation and trial set of PoseTrack2017 and PoseTrack2018 datasets. Even though our model is designed to improve affectation detection in scenarios necessitate sparsely - label videos, here we prove that our temporal pose collection scheme during inference is also utilitarian for models trained on densely labeled videos. We improve upon the state - of - the - artwork single - frame baselines   [ @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep; @DBLP: conf / eccv / GuoTLCLW18].[]{data - label="sota_table " } 

 Comparison to country - of - the - Art 
 ------------------------------ 

 We also test the potency of our temporal affectation aggregation outline, when the model is trained on the full PoseTrack   [ @Iqbal_CVPR2017 ] dataset. Table   \[sota\_table\ ] compare our method to the most recent approaches in this area   [ @girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep ]. These results suggest that although we designed our method to improve pose estimation when training videos are sparsely - labeled, our temporal pose collection scheme applied at inference is besides utilitarian for models trained on densely - labeled video. Our PoseWarper obtains $ 81.2 $ mAP and $ 77.9 $ mAP on PoseTrack2017 validation and trial sets respectively, and $ 79.7 $ mAP and $ 78.0 $ mAP on PoseTrack2018 validation and test sets respectively, therefore outperforming prior single frame baselines   [ @girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep ]. 

 Interpreting Learned Offsets 
 ---------------------------- 

 sympathize what information is encoded in our learned offsets is nearly equally difficult as analyzing any other CNN features   [ @journals / corr / ZeilerF13; @journals / corr / YosinskiCNFL15 ]. The main challenge comes from the high dimensionality of offsets: we are predicting $ deoxycytidine monophosphate \times k_h \times k_w$ $ (x, y)$ displacements for every pixel for each of the five dilation rates $ d$, where $ c$ is the number of channels, and $
9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & 71.8 & **78.0\                                                                        
                                                       ****************                                                                                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  : Multi-pqrson ppsf estimation rgsultx on fhe validation and test sets of PoaeTrack2017 and PoseTracl2018 datasets. Even though our modfl is designed to lmprove posg deewction in scdnarios innmlving spatsely-labeled videos, here we show that our tempotco plve aggregatmon screme during lmferenwe is akso useful for movels trained on densely lebeled videos. We imptove upon dhz state-of-the-art singlw-feame taseniner [@ziau2018sijpke; @sun2019defp; @VBLP:conf/eccb/GuoTLCLW18].[]{dara-label="sota_table"}

Comkarywon to State-or-the-Are
------------------------------

Wq also test the effectiveness of our tekpodal pose aggregation scyeme, when the model id trained on the full PoseTrack [@Iqbal_CVPR2017] dataset. Table \[sota\_dable\] zomkavcs oje lethod to the most recent approaches in this wdes [@gprdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018posefloe; @disj2018simple; @sun2019degp]. Thesz rssults suggest thah althoogh we designed our method to improve pose estumation when rraining videos arz sparsely-layeled, pur trmporal pose aggregatiou scheje applied wt inferehze is also usefuu fpr models ufained on densely-jabeled vmdeos. Our PoreWatper obeains $81.2$ mAP and $77.9$ mAP on PoseTrack2017 vwlidajion atd test sehs respectively, and $79.7$ mAP and $78.0$ mE' on PoseTracl2018 ealpdation aud tesb sets respectidely, thus outpgrforming priof single fgame basenines [@girdhaw2018detecttrack; @flu2018poseflow; @xmao2018simple; @sun2019eeep].

Unterprdging Learned Ogfsets
----------------------------

Undvrftaneing what informatlon ir encoded in our leqrned offsets ix ndarjy ax qhfficult as dnalhzivb any other CNN neagurex [@journals/corr/ZeilerF13; @joudnals/corr/YosinskiCMFJ15]. The maun challqnge comes frpm the high dimenslonalmty of offsrts: we are predicting $c \times k_h \fimes k_w$ $(d,y)$ qisplacementf fov evgry pixel fpr each of the five dilation rates $d$, whxre $c$ is the number of xhannels, and $
9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & **************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Multi-person pose estimation test of PoseTrack2017 and datasets. Even though model is designed to improve pose in scenarios involving sparsely-labeled videos, here we show that our temporal pose aggregation during inference is also useful for models trained on densely labeled videos. We upon state-of-the-art baselines @sun2019deep; @DBLP:conf/eccv/GuoTLCLW18].[]{data-label="sota_table"} Comparison to State-of-the-Art ------------------------------ We also test the effectiveness of our temporal pose aggregation when the model is trained on the full [@Iqbal_CVPR2017] dataset. Table \[sota\_table\] our method to the most approaches this area @xiu2018poseflow; @sun2019deep]. results suggest that we designed our method to improve pose estimation when training videos are sparsely-labeled, our temporal pose aggregation applied at also useful models on videos. Our PoseWarper mAP and $77.9$ mAP on PoseTrack2017 sets respectively, and $79.7$ mAP and $78.0$ mAP PoseTrack2018 validation test sets respectively, thus outperforming prior frame baselines [@girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep]. Interpreting Learned ---------------------------- Understanding what information is encoded in our learned offsets is nearly as difficult as other CNN features [@journals/corr/ZeilerF13; The main challenge from high of we are $c \times k_h \times k_w$ $(x,y)$ displacements for every pixel for of the five dilation rates $d$, where $c$ is the channels, $
9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & 71.8 & **78.0\                                                                        
                                                       ****************                                                                                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  : Multi-person pose estimation Results on tHe valIdaTioN aNd teSt seTs of PoseTrack2017 aND PosETrack2018 datasets. Even thouGh our MoDEl is DEsIgned To improVE pOSE deTeCtIon In SCeNarioS inVolving Sparsely-laBelEd Videos, here we SHoW that our teMpoRal pose aggreGatIon schEmE duRIng inFerEnce iS also uSEful foR models trAiNEd on deNSely labELEd VideOs. We improve upon thE StATe-of-the-art singLe-framE bASeLINes [@XiaO2018simple; @sun2019DeEp; @DBLp:Conf/eccV/guOtlcLW18].[]{DAta-label="sota_tAble"}

CompariSOn tO State-Of-The-aRt
------------------------------

We alSo tesT tHE efFectiveness Of ouR temporal Pose agGRegatioN Scheme, wHen the ModEl iS traINeD oN thE fULl POSetraCK [@IqBal_CVPR2017] dAtAsEt. TabLe \[soTA\_TABle\] cOmpAres Our meThod to the most RecEnt aPProAches In thiS areA [@gIrdhaR2018detecTtracK; @xIu2018poseflow; @xiao2018sImplE; @sun2019deep]. THesE rEsuLtS suggESt that AltHouGh we desIgned ouR MetHoD TO ImProve pose estimatioN wHEN tRaining vIdeos aRE sPaRSely-labeLeD, ouR temPORal poSe agGReGation scHeme apPLiEd At inferEnCe is alSo UseFul For moDEls tRained On denselY-labeLEd videos. Our PosEwarper obtains $81.2$ MaP AND $77.9$ map on POsetrack2017 validaTion ANd teSt seTS rEspECtiveLy, and $79.7$ MAp AnD $78.0$ MAP on PoseTrack2018 validAtIon and Test sEts respectiveLy, thus outpERFOrming prIor sINgLE frame baselineS [@girdHar2018detecttRAck; @xiu2018poSefloW; @xiao2018simPle; @sun2019deeP].

iNterpretIng leaRneD OfFSEtS
----------------------------

UnderstandinG WHat iNfOrmatioN is Encoded In oUr lEarNed OfFsets is neArly as diFfIcUlT aS anAlyziNG any otheR CnN fEaTurEs [@jouRNals/coRr/ZeiLerF13; @JoUrNAls/Corr/YosINsKIcNFL15]. thE mAin cHalLeNge coMes fROm tHe high dImensionaLitY Of ofFsEtS: we are pRedicting $c \timEs K_h \times k_w$ $(x,Y)$ dIspLacemeNTS for everY pixel for each of the five dILation rAteS $d$, wheRe $c$ iS the numbeR of ChanneLs, aND $
9 & 76.8 & 75.6 & 77.5 & 7 1.8 & **78 .0\                                                         
                                      *** *** ** ********                                                                            
 --- ----------------- - -- - -------------- ------ -- - -- - - --- --- ---------- -- ----- - ------- - -- - - - --- - ------------- ----------- - --- ------ -- --- - ------ ----- -- - --- ----------- ---- --------- ---

: Multi - personpose e sti mat ionr es ul tson the va lid a tio n and te st  s ets o f Po s e T r ack2 017  and  Pose Track2018 dat ase ts.E ven  thou gh ou r mo de l isdesign ed to  i mprove pose det ecti on in sce nar io s i nv olvin g  spars ely -la beled v ideos,h ere  w e s ho w that our tempora lp o se  aggrega tion s c he me during i nf ere ncei s  also  use f ul  for mod els tr a in ed  on den se ly lab el edvid eos.W e im proveupon the  stat e -of-the-art si n gle-frame bas e li n e s[ @xia o20 18simple; @ sun2 0 19de ep;@ DB LP: c onf/e ccv/G uo T LC L W18].[]{data-label= "s ota_ta ble"} 

Comparisonto State-o f - t he-Art
- ---- - -- - -------------- ----- --

We als o  test th e eff ectivene ss of our t emporalpos e a ggr ega t i on  scheme, when t he m od el is t rai ned onthe  fu llPos eT rack [@Iq bal_CVPR 20 17 ]da tas et. T a ble \[so ta \_t ab le\ ] com p ares o ur me thod  t ot hemost re c en t appr oa ch es i n t hi s are a [@ g ird har2018 detecttra ck; @xiu 20 18 poseflo w; @xiao2018s im ple; @sun2 01 9de ep]. T h e se resul ts suggest that althoug h  we des ign ed ou r me thod to i mpr ove po see stimat ion wh en tr ai nin g video s ar e s pa rsely-labe l e d,our t em pora l poseaggregation scheme app lied at infer enc e is a ls o u s ef u l f or mod e l s trained on de nsely-labe le d  v ideos. Our Pos eW arper o btains$81.2 $  mAP an d $77.9$mAP on Po se Trac k 2 017  validatio n and te st sets r e spect i ve ly, a nd$79.7$  m APand $ 78.0$m APon Po seTrac k2 018 va lidat io n and te st sets respectively, t hus ou tperf orm ing prior  si n gle  frame ba seli nes [@gird har 201 8dete ctt r ack;@xiu 2 01 8po s eflow ; @x i ao2018sim p le ; @ s u n2 019deep].
I n t erp retin g L e arnedOffs ets
------------- - -------------- 

Un d e rst and i ng w ha t informationisen c o ded in o ur  learned of fsets is  n e arlyas dif ficult  as ana l y zi n g anyothe r C NN featur es[@ j ournals /c or r /Zeile rF13 ;@journ als/co r r/Yo s i nskiCNFL15]. The  main c halle n gecomes  f rom the high  dimension ality of of fsets:  weare p redicti ng  $c \t ime sk_h \times k_w$ $(x, y)$ d isplace me ntsfor  every  pix e l  foreach  o f t he five d i l at i on  r a tes  $d$ , whe re  $c$  is the n u mber ofcha n nels, a nd  $
9 &_76.8 &_75.6 & 77.5 &_71.8 &_**78.0\_ __  _  _   _  __             __ ___    _    _ _       __  _        _  
   _  ___   _     _     _      _     _    _ _    _  _ _****************  _     _  _     __  ___ _  __ __     __      _   __   _    _     _ _ _          _     _   _ __  __ _
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  : Multi-person pose_estimation results_on the validation and test sets_of PoseTrack2017 and PoseTrack2018_datasets._Even though our model is designed_to improve pose detection in scenarios_involving sparsely-labeled videos, here we_show_that_our temporal pose aggregation scheme_during inference is also useful for_models trained on_densely labeled videos. We improve upon the_state-of-the-art_single-frame baselines [@xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep; @DBLP:conf/eccv/GuoTLCLW18].[]{data-label="sota_table"}

Comparison to State-of-the-Art
------------------------------

We_also_test the effectiveness of our temporal_pose_aggregation_scheme, when the model is_trained on the full PoseTrack [@Iqbal_CVPR2017] dataset._Table \[sota\_table\] compares our method to the most recent approaches_in this area [@girdhar2018detecttrack;_@xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep]. These results_suggest_that_although we designed our method to improve pose estimation when_training videos_are sparsely-labeled, our_temporal pose aggregation scheme applied at inference is also useful_for models trained on densely-labeled videos. Our_PoseWarper obtains $81.2$ mAP and $77.9$ mAP on PoseTrack2017 validation and_test sets respectively, and $79.7$ mAP and $78.0$_mAP on PoseTrack2018 validation and test sets_respectively, thus outperforming prior_single_frame baselines [@girdhar2018detecttrack; @xiu2018poseflow; @xiao2018simple; @sun2019deep].

Interpreting Learned Offsets
----------------------------

Understanding_what_information_is_encoded in our_learned offsets is_nearly as difficult_as analyzing_any other CNN_features [@journals/corr/ZeilerF13; @journals/corr/YosinskiCNFL15]._The main challenge_comes_from the high dimensionality of offsets: we are predicting $c \times k_h \times k_w$ $(x,y)$ displacements for every_pixel for each of the five_dilation rates $d$, where $c$_is_the number of_channels, and $