 the nodes belonging to the individual $b$ are permuted (any valid permutation is permitted, including the permutation that does not change the node labels of the individual). According to this definition, there are nine condensed identity states. Let $c_i$ be the number of condensed identity states which contain $i$ distinct identity states. Then the 9 condensed identity states group the 15 identity states into groups $c_1=5, c_2=3, c_3=0, c_4=1$ (see Figure \[fig:identstates\] for drawings of all the identity state graphs grouped into the condensed identity states). Similar to the identity coefficient, each of these condensed identity states has a corresponding *condensed identity coefficient* which is the fraction of the $2^n$ inheritance paths for the pedigree with $n$ edges that exhibit the condensed identity state.

![[**Identity States.**]{} The 15 identity states are grouped so that each row corresponds to one of the 9 condensed identity states. The number of founder alleles for each identity state is listed, along with whether the identity state is outbred. []{data-label="fig:identstates"}](identitystates.eps){width="3in"}

We need one last concept, still defined with respect to a pair of individuals in a pedigree. The *kinship coefficient* for that pair of individuals is defined as the probability of IBD when choosing one allele from each individual uniformly at random. The exact kinship coefficients for every pair of individuals are typically computed from known relationships–a pedigree graph–using a recursive computation, [@Kirkpatrick2016a; @Abney2009; @Karigl81; @thompson1985].

Methods {#sec:methods}
=======

\[em\]

We focus on estimating the identity coefficients. [^2] We do not directly estimate the kinship coefficients from the genotypes, because we have no model by which the kinship coefficients can generate the genotypes. On the other hand, if we know the identity states, their coefficients, and the allele frequencies in the founders, there is a generative model for producing the genotype. Since the kinship coefficients can be expressed as an expectation with respect to the identity coefficients, they contain a degenerate version of the information contained in the identity coefficients and do not provide a convenient generative model for the genotype.

The estimated identity coefficients are then transformed into estimates of the kinship using equations developed by [@Kirkpatrick2011
the nodes belonging to the individual $ b$ are permuted (any valid substitution is allow, including the permutation that does not transfer the node label of the individual). According to this definition, there be nine condensed identity state. Let $ c_i$ be the act of condensed identity states which check $ i$ distinct identity states. Then the 9 condense identity country group the 15 identity states into groups $ c_1=5, c_2=3, c_3=0, c_4=1 $ (see Figure   \[fig: identstates\ ] for drawings of all the identity state graph grouped into the condensed identity states). like to the identity coefficient, each of these condensed identity states hold a comparable * condensed identity coefficient * which is the fraction of the $ 2^n$ inheritance paths for the pedigree with $ n$ edges that exhibit the condensed identity department of state. 

! [ [ * * Identity States. * * ] { } The 15 identity states are grouped so that each row corresponds to one of the 9 condensed identity states. The number of founder alleles for each identity state is listed, along with whether the identity state is outbred. [ ] { data - label="fig: identstates"}](identitystates.eps){width="3 in " } 

 We need one last concept, still defined with esteem to a pair of individuals in a lineage. The * affinity coefficient * for that pair of individuals is defined as the probability of IBD when choosing one allele from each individual uniformly at random. The accurate kinship coefficient for every pair of individuals are typically computed from know relationships – a pedigree graph – using a recursive computation,   [ @Kirkpatrick2016a; @Abney2009; @Karigl81; @thompson1985 ]. 

 Methods { # sec: methods } 
 = = = = = = = 

 \[em\ ] 

 We focus on estimating the identity coefficients.   [ ^2 ] We do not directly estimate the kinship coefficients from the genotypes, because we give birth no exemplar by which the kinship coefficients can generate the genotypes. On the other bridge player, if we know the identity states, their coefficients, and the allele frequency in the founders, there is a generative model for producing the genotype. Since the affinity coefficients can be expressed as an expectation with respect to the identity coefficients, they incorporate a degenerate adaptation of the information contain in the identity coefficients and do not leave a convenient generative model for the genotype. 

 The estimated identity coefficient are then transformed into estimates of the kinship using equations developed by   [ @Kirkpatrick2011
 thf nodes belonging to the individual $b$ ate permuved (any valid pdrmutation is permitted, inclndint the permutation that does not chanhe the nide oqbels of tis indivlbual). Zgcordnnj to this definltion, there are nine condanreb identity states. Let $c_i$ be the numbqr of cpnfensed identiti staues whidh contain $i$ distinct identity stafes. Thei the 9 condensec identity states group thf 15 ifentity states intl groups $c_1=5, x_2=3, c_3=0, s_4=1$ (see Figure \[fkg:identstauev\] for drawjngs of all the identity state eraphx grouped unro hve condensev idennity states). Slkilar do the odentity coefflcienv, eaxh of these condensed identity states hws a corras'onding *condensed idebtuty cmeffhcievr* wficg ms fhe frwctmon of the $2^h$ inheritanxe paths for the pecidgre with $n$ edfes thwt exhibit the condensed identity state.

![[**Idtntitg States.**]{} The 15 identity wtates are grouped so that eacr row corresponds to one of the 9 condensed identidy stetds. Uhc vymher of founder alleles for each identity statq ix kisted, along wlth whether the idrnhiyi state is outcred. []{dcfa-mabel="fig:identstated"}](identijystatws.eps){widtr="3in"}

Wr need one last concept, stiol defined wpth eespect to a pair lf individucls in a pecigree. The *kinship coefyicienf* for that oair of ihaividuals is defknec ds the probability of IBD rhen choowing one aluele from qach indivldual uniformly at randol. The efact kinshlp coefficients for every pair of individuals ase nypically compmted from known relationships–c pedigrze graoh–using a gecursive computatiog, [@Kirkpatrick2016a; @Wbney2009; @Karigl81; @thompsog1985].

Metyods {#sec:metfuds}
=======

\[em\]

We focus pn estimaniug the idwntity coefficientx. [^2] Wg so not directly esuinate the kinshop zoesfpcixnts ssom the genodyper, bdvause we havt ni modrl by which the kinsvip doefficients can grncrate the genotypqs. On the othrr hand, if we know the mdentivy stayes, their coefficients, and the almele freqkengies in the fjundcrs, jhere is a yenerative model for producing the genotbpe. Since the kinship ciefficients can be gxpvessed as an expestation whth respect to the ieentity coefficiekts, they contain a degsnerata verdion of the information contained in the identity coefficients and do not provive a convenieht grneranivz mpdel fjr tie genotype.

The estpmated identity coefficients are then trdnfformed into estimates of thr yinship using equations developed by [@Kjrkpatrivk2011
the nodes belonging to the individual $b$ (any permutation is including the permutation node of the individual). to this definition, are nine condensed identity states. Let be the number of condensed identity states which contain $i$ distinct identity states. the 9 condensed identity states group the 15 identity states into groups $c_1=5, c_3=0, (see \[fig:identstates\] drawings of all the identity state graphs grouped into the condensed identity states). Similar to the coefficient, each of these condensed identity states has corresponding *condensed identity coefficient* is the fraction of the inheritance for the with edges exhibit the condensed state. ![[**Identity States.**]{} The 15 identity states are grouped so that each row corresponds to one of 9 condensed The number founder for identity state is with whether the identity state is need one last concept, still defined with respect a pair individuals in a pedigree. The *kinship for that pair of individuals is defined as probability of IBD when choosing one allele from each individual uniformly at random. The exact for every pair of are typically computed known pedigree a computation, [@Kirkpatrick2016a; @Karigl81; @thompson1985]. Methods {#sec:methods} ======= \[em\] We focus on estimating the coefficients. [^2] We do not directly estimate the kinship coefficients genotypes, we have no by which the kinship can the genotypes. On the if know their and allele frequencies in the there is a generative model producing the genotype. Since expressed as an expectation with respect to the coefficients, they contain a degenerate version of information contained in the identity coefficients and do not provide a convenient model for The estimated identity coefficients are then transformed into of the kinship using developed by [@Kirkpatrick2011
 the nodes belonging to the indIvidual $b$ arE permUteD (anY vAlid PermUtation is permiTTed, iNcluding the permutation That dOeS Not cHAnGe the Node labELs OF The InDiVidUaL). acCordiNg tO this deFinition, thEre ArE nine condensED iDentity staTes. let $c_i$ be the nuMbeR of conDeNseD IdentIty StateS which COntain $I$ distinct IdENtity sTAtes. TheN THe 9 CondEnsed identity statES gROup the 15 identity States InTO gROUps $C_1=5, c_2=3, c_3=0, C_4=1$ (see Figure \[FiG:idenTStates\] fOR dRAWIngS Of all the identIty state graPHs gRouped InTo tHE condeNsed iDeNTitY states). SimiLar tO the identIty coeFFicient, EAch of thEse conDenSed IdenTItY sTatEs HAs a COrResPOndIng *condeNsEd IdentIty cOEFFIcieNt* wHich Is the Fraction of the $2^N$ inHeriTAncE pathS for tHe peDiGree wIth $n$ edGes thAt Exhibit the condeNsed Identity sTatE.

![[**IDenTiTy StaTEs.**]{} The 15 iDenTitY states Are grouPEd sO tHAT EaCh row corresponds to OnE OF tHe 9 condenSed ideNTiTy STates. The NuMbeR of fOUNder aLlelES fOr each idEntity STaTe Is listeD, aLong wiTh WheTheR the iDEntiTy statE is outbrEd. []{datA-Label="fig:identsTAtes"}](identitysTAtES.EpS){WidtH="3in"}

we need one laSt coNCept, StilL DeFinED with RespeCt TO a PAir of individuals in a PeDigree. the *kiNship coefficiEnt* for that PAIR of indivIduaLS iS Defined as the prObabiLity of IBD wHEn choosiNg one Allele frOm each indIVIdual uniForMly At rAndOM. thE exact kinship COEffiCiEnts for EveRy pair oF inDivIduAls ArE typicallY computeD fRoM kNoWn rElatiONships–a pEdIgrEe GraPh–usiNG a recuRsive CompUtAtIOn, [@KIrkpatrICk2016A; @aBney2009; @kaRiGl81; @thOmpSoN1985].

MethOds {#sEC:meThods}
=======

\[em\]

we focus on EstIMatiNg ThE identiTy coefficientS. [^2] WE do not direCtLy eStimatE THe kinshiP coefficients from the genOTypes, beCauSe we hAve nO model by wHicH the kiNshIP coeffIcientS can gEnEraTE The geNOTyPes. on The other haND, If wE know ThE ideNtity stAtes, their coefficieNTs, aNd the allele frEquEnciES In The FOuNDerS, tHEre IS A generative modeL for producInG ThE genotype. SINce ThE kinshiP coeffiCientS Can be exPressed as An expectaTiOn wiTH ResPect to the iDentity cOefficienTS, they COnTain a DegEneratE vErsIon of The infORmaTion cOntainEd In the iDentiTy CoefficiEnts and do not provide a conVenienT geneRatIve model fOr tHE geNotype.

The EstiMated identIty CoeFficiEntS Are thEn trANsForMEd intO estIMates of thE KiNshIP UsIng equationS DEVelOped bY [@KiRKpatriCk2011
 the nodes belonging to th e individu al $b $ a repe rmut ed ( any valid perm u tati on is permitted, inclu dingth e  per m ut ation  that d o es n otch an geth e  n ode l abe ls of t he individ ual ).  According t o  t his defini tio n, there are  ni ne con de nse d  iden tit y sta tes. L e t $c_i $ be thenu m ber of condens e d  i dent ity states whichc on t ain $i$ distin ct ide nt i ty s tat es.  Then the9conde n sed ide n ti t y sta t es group the15 identity sta tes in to  gr o ups $c _1=5,  c _ 2=3 , c_3=0, c_ 4=1$  (see Fig ure \[ f ig:iden t states\ ] fordra win gs o f  a ll  th ei den t it y s t ate  graphsgr ou ped i ntot h e cond ens ed i denti ty states). S imi lart o t he id entit y co ef ficie nt, ea ch of  t hese condensediden tity stat esha s a  c orres p onding  *c ond ensed i dentity coe ff i c i en t* which is the fr ac t i on  of the$2^n$i nh er i tance pa th s f or t h e  pedi gree wi th $n$ e dges t h at  e xhibitth e cond en sed  id entit y  sta te.

! [[**Iden tityS tates.**]{} Th e  15 identitys ta t e sa re g rou ped so that  eac h  row  cor r es pon d s toone o ft he 9 condensed identit ystates . The  number of fo under alle l e s  for eac h id e nt i ty state is li sted,  along wit h  whether  theidentity  state is o utbred.[]{ dat a-l abe l = "f ig:identstate s " }](i de ntityst ate s.eps){ wid th= "3i n"} 
We need o ne lastco nc ep t,  st ill d e fined wi th  re sp ect  to a pair o f ind ivid ua ls ina pedig r ee . The*k in ship  co ef ficie nt*f orthat pa ir of ind ivi d uals  i sdefined  as the proba bi lity of IB Dwhe n choo s i ng one a llele from each individ u al unif orm ly at  ran dom. Theexa ct kin shi p  coeff icient s for  e ver y pairo f  i ndi vi duals aret y pic allyco mput ed from  known relationshi p s–a  pedigree gra ph– usin g arec u rs i veco m put a t ion, [@Kirkpatr ick2016a;@A b ne y2009; @Ka r igl 81 ; @thom pson198 5].
M ethods{#sec:met hods}
=== == ==
\ [ em\ ]

We focu s on est imating t h e ide n ti ty co eff icient s.  [^ 2] We  do no t  di rectl y esti ma te the  kins hi p coeffi cients from the genotyp es, be cause  we  have nomod e l b y which t he k inship coe ffi cie nts c ang enera te t h egen o types . On the other ha nd, i fwe know the i d ent ity s tat e s, the ir c oefficients, andt he allele freq uenc i e s i n t h e fo un ders, there is  age n e rative m od el for prod ucing th eg enoty pe. Si nce th e kinsh i p  c o effici ents  ca n be expr ess ed as an e xp ec t ationwith  r espect  to th e  ide n t ity coefficients , the y conta i n a  dege ne rate ve r sion  of the in formation c ontain ed i n the  identi ty  coeff ici en ts and don ot provid e a c onvenie nt  gen era tive m odel f or th e ge no typ e.

The e s t im a te di den tity  coef fi cien ts are th e n transf orm e d intoes tim a t es oft he k inship usi ngequat i o ns develop e d by [@ K irkpa trick2 011
 the_nodes belonging_to the individual $b$_are permuted_(any_valid permutation_is_permitted, including the_permutation that does_not change the node_labels of the_individual)._According to this definition, there are nine condensed identity states. Let $c_i$ be the_number_of condensed_identity_states_which contain $i$ distinct identity_states. Then the 9 condensed_identity states_group the 15 identity states into groups $c_1=5,_c_2=3,_c_3=0, c_4=1$ (see_Figure \[fig:identstates\] for drawings of all the identity state graphs_grouped into the condensed identity states)._Similar to the_identity_coefficient,_each of these condensed_identity states has a corresponding *condensed_identity coefficient* which is the fraction_of the $2^n$ inheritance paths for the_pedigree with $n$ edges that exhibit_the condensed identity state.

![[**Identity States.**]{}_The 15_identity states are grouped so_that each row_corresponds to_one of the_9 condensed identity states. The number_of founder alleles_for each identity state is listed,_along_with whether the_identity_state_is outbred._[]{data-label="fig:identstates"}](identitystates.eps){width="3in"}

We need one_last_concept, still_defined_with respect to a pair of_individuals_in a pedigree. The *kinship coefficient* for_that pair of individuals_is_defined as the probability_of IBD when choosing one_allele from each individual uniformly at_random. The_exact kinship_coefficients for every pair of individuals are typically computed from known_relationships–a pedigree graph–using a recursive computation, [@Kirkpatrick2016a;_@Abney2009; @Karigl81; @thompson1985].

Methods {#sec:methods}
=======

\[em\]

We_focus on_estimating_the identity coefficients. [^2]_We_do not_directly estimate the kinship coefficients from the_genotypes, because_we have no model by which_the kinship coefficients can_generate_the genotypes. On the other hand,_if we know the identity states,_their coefficients, and the allele_frequencies_in_the founders, there is a_generative model for producing the genotype._Since the kinship_coefficients can be expressed as an expectation_with_respect to the identity coefficients, they_contain_a degenerate version of the information_contained_in_the identity coefficients and do_not provide a convenient generative model_for the genotype.

The estimated identity coefficients are then transformed_into estimates of_the kinship using equations developed_by [@Kirkpatrick2011