_{max}} dn  \nonumber \\ 
& & \int_{0}^{ 2 \pi} d \phi_n 
{  {  E_{\nu} n p^2 k } \over { E_p E_n \vert {\vec n} + {\vec p} \vert}}
{1 \over 4} \sum_{spins}
 \vert M_{f i } {\vert}^{2} ~,\end{aligned}$$

where the integration intervals of nucleon momenta, which comes from the Pauli blocking in nuclear matter, are calculated in detailed kinematics and $k_F$ is the Fermi momentum. For finite nuclei, we need to know the corresponding muon wave functions and $k_F$ values, but which depends on the model. We already suggested a model [@Ch97] for this purpose, but will be skipped here and concentrate on the case of nuclear matter.

Results and Discussions
=======================

Our results for RMC on proton are shown in Fig.1. The solid curve is the spectrum obtained in ref. 2., i.e. the result without $\Delta M_e$ term for ${\hat g}_P = 9.8$. On the other hand, the dotted curve is calculated without $\Delta M_e$ term for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77. This curve is obviously much lower than the solid curve. When $\Delta M_e$ term is taken into account for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77, we obtain the dashed curve which is very close to the solid curve for the energy spectrum on $k \ge 60 MeV$. The minor discrepancy may be due to the neglect of higher order contributions and other degree of freedom such as $\Delta$. Our result shows that $\Delta M_e$ term restores the credit of ${\hat g}_P = 6.77$.

The number of RMC photons observed for $k \ge 60 MeV $ is 279 $\pm$ 26 and the number of those from the solid curve is 299, while our result obtained by integrating the dotted curve spectrum is 273. Since the contribution of $\Delta$ degree of freedom is known to be a few percent [@Be87], it is not included in the present calculation. Vector mesons such as $\rho$ and $\omega$ are also turned out to have very small contributions in this calculation. Higher order terms are pointed out to be insignificant [@Fe80].

It is confirmed
_ { max } } dn   \nonumber \\ 
 & & \int_{0}^ { 2 \pi } d \phi_n 
 {   {   E_{\nu } n p^2 k } \over { E_p E_n \vert { \vec n } + { \vec p } \vert } } 
 { 1 \over 4 } \sum_{spins } 
  \vert M_{f i } { \vert}^{2 } ~,\end{aligned}$$ 

 where the integration intervals of nucleon momentum, which come from the Pauli blocking in nuclear matter, are calculated in detailed kinematics and $ k_F$ is the Fermi momentum. For finite nuclei, we need to sleep together the corresponding muon wave functions and $ k_F$ value, but which count on the model. We already propose a model [ @Ch97 ] for this purpose, but will be decamp here and concentrate on the case of nuclear topic. 

 Results and Discussions 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Our results for RMC on proton are shown in Fig.1. The solid curve is the spectrum obtained in ref. 2. , i.e. the consequence without $ \Delta M_e$ term for $ { \hat g}_P = 9.8$. On the other hand, the dashed curve is calculated without $ \Delta M_e$ condition for $ { \hat g}_P$ = 6.77. This curve is obviously a lot lower than the firm curve. When $ \Delta M_e$ term is taken into report for $ { \hat g}_P$ = 6.77, we obtain the dashed curve which is very close to the solid curvature for the energy spectrum on $ k \ge 60 MeV$. The minor discrepancy may be due to the neglect of higher order contributions and other degree of freedom such as $ \Delta$. Our result read that $ \Delta M_e$ term restores the credit rating of $ { \hat g}_P = 6.77$. 

 The number of RMC photons observed for $ k \ge 60 MeV $ is 279 $ \pm$ 26 and the number of those from the upstanding curve is 299, while our result obtained by integrating the dashed curve spectrum is 273. Since the contribution of $ \Delta$ degree of freedom is known to be a few percent [ @Be87 ], it is not included in the present calculation. Vector mesons such as $ \rho$ and $ \omega$ are also turned out to have very small contributions in this calculation. high order term are point out to be insignificant [ @Fe80 ]. 

 It is confirmed
_{max}} dn  \nonumber \\ 
& & \int_{0}^{ 2 \pi} d \phi_n 
{  {  E_{\nu} n p^2 k } \over { E_p E_n \vdrt {\vec n} + {\vec p} \vert}}
{1 \over 4} \dun_{spinw}
 \vert M_{f i } {\vert}^{2} ~,\end{auigned}$$

whege the inregretion intervals of nucleon momskta, wkirh comes from tme Pauli blmcking in nuclaaf latter, are calculated in detailed kynemativs and $k_F$ is the Ferky mojvnuum. For finite nuclei, we need to inow tht corresponding mupn wave functions and $k_F$ vwlued, but which dependd on the moeel. Rw already suegested a model [@Ch97] for this purpose, but will be skippdd hexe and concgurrahg on the casx of nlclear matter.

Vvsults dnd Disvussions
=======================

Our rexulvs fir RMC on proton are vhown in Fig.1. The sjlid curva ns the spectrum obtaibee in tef. 2., h.e. tfw rdsumt wjthout $\Demta M_e$ terj for ${\hat g}_P = 9.8$. On the other hamd, nne dotted cudve is cwlculated without $\Delta M_e$ term for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77. This curve is obviouwly much lower than tje solid surve. When $\Delta M_e$ term is taken into account fos ${\hat e}_P$ = 6.77, rd ohtain the dashed curve which is very close to fht splid curve for the energy soevjrum on $k \ge 60 OeV$. Thz mjnor discrepancy mwy be doe to rhe neglest og higher order contributionw and other begeee of freedom suck as $\Delta$. Obr resolt shpws that $\Delta M_e$ term xestorss the credlt of ${\hat e}_P = 6.77$.

The number ow RKC photons observed for $k \ge 60 MeV $ is 279 $\pm$ 26 and tfe nomber os those frlm thc solid curve is 299, wjile lus result ohtained by integrating the dottxv curve specttum is 273. Since che coktribution of $\Dqlta$ degree of freedoi is ynown to bv a few pxrcent [@Be87], it is not incluggd in the prevent calsularion. Vector oesons such as $\rho$ and $\omega$ are qlso turned out to haxs very small couurivutions in this caucujanioi. Higrar order terks afe opintea out to be knsibnificant [@Fe80].

It is cotfirjed
_{max}} dn \nonumber \\ & & \int_{0}^{ d { { n p^2 k \vert n} + {\vec \vert}} {1 \over \sum_{spins} \vert M_{f i } {\vert}^{2} where the integration intervals of nucleon momenta, which comes from the Pauli blocking nuclear matter, are calculated in detailed kinematics and $k_F$ is the Fermi momentum. finite we to the corresponding muon wave functions and $k_F$ values, but which depends on the model. We already a model [@Ch97] for this purpose, but will skipped here and concentrate the case of nuclear matter. and ======================= Our for on are shown in The solid curve is the spectrum obtained in ref. 2., i.e. the result without $\Delta M_e$ term ${\hat g}_P On the hand, dotted is calculated without term for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77. obviously much lower than the solid curve. When M_e$ term taken into account for ${\hat g}_P$ 6.77, we obtain the dashed curve which is close to the solid curve for the energy spectrum on $k \ge 60 MeV$. The may be due to neglect of higher contributions other of such as Our result shows that $\Delta M_e$ term restores the credit of g}_P = 6.77$. The number of RMC photons observed for 60 $ is 279 26 and the number those the solid curve is our obtained dotted spectrum 273. Since the contribution $\Delta$ degree of freedom is to be a few included in the present calculation. Vector mesons such $\rho$ and $\omega$ are also turned out have very small contributions in this calculation. Higher order terms are pointed to be It is confirmed
_{max}} dn  \nonumber \\ 
& & \int_{0}^{ 2 \pi} d \phi_n 
{  {  E_{\nU} n p^2 k } \over { E_p e_n \verT {\veC n} + {\vEc P} \verT}}
{1 \oveR 4} \sum_{spins}
 \vert M_{F I } {\verT}^{2} ~,\end{aligned}$$

where the intEgratIoN InteRVaLs of nUcleon mOMeNTA, whIcH cOmeS fROm The PaUli BlockinG in nuclear MatTeR, are calculatED iN detailed kIneMatics and $k_F$ iS thE Fermi MoMenTUm. For FinIte nuClei, we NEed to kNow the corReSPondinG Muon wavE FUnCtioNs and $k_F$ values, but wHIcH Depends on the moDel. We aLrEAdY SUggEstEd a model [@Ch97] FoR this PUrpose, bUT wILL Be sKIpped here and cOncentrate oN The Case of NuCleAR matteR.

ResuLtS And discussions
=======================

our rEsults for rMC on pROton are SHown in FIg.1. The sOliD cuRve iS ThE sPecTrUM obTAiNed IN reF. 2., i.e. the reSuLt WithoUt $\DeLTA m_E$ terM foR ${\hat G}_P = 9.8$. On tHe other hand, thE doTted CUrvE is caLculaTed wItHout $\DElta M_e$ Term fOr ${\Hat g}_P$ = 6.77. This curve iS obvIously mucH loWeR thAn The soLId curvE. WhEn $\DElta M_e$ tErm is taKEn iNtO ACCoUnt for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77, we obtaiN tHE DaShed curvE which IS vErY Close to tHe SolId cuRVE for tHe enERgY spectruM on $k \ge 60 mEV$. thE minor dIsCrepanCy May Be dUe to tHE negLect of Higher orDer coNTributions and oTHer degree of frEEdOM SuCH as $\DEltA$. Our result sHows THat $\DElta m_E$ tErm REstorEs the CrEDiT Of ${\hat g}_P = 6.77$.

The number of RmC PhotonS obseRved for $k \ge 60 MeV $ Is 279 $\pm$ 26 and the NUMBer of thoSe frOM tHE solid curve is 299, wHile oUr result obTAined by iNtegrAting the Dotted curVE Spectrum Is 273. SIncE thE coNTRiBution of $\Delta$ DEGree Of Freedom Is kNown to bE a fEw pErcEnt [@be87], It is not inCluded in ThE pReSeNt cAlculATion. VectOr MesOnS suCh as $\rHO$ and $\omEga$ arE alsO tUrNEd oUt to havE VeRY SmalL cOnTribUtiOnS in thIs caLCulAtion. HiGher order TerMS are PoInTed out tO be insignificAnT [@Fe80].

It is conFiRmeD
_{max}} dn  \nonumber \\ & & \int_{ 0}^{2 \ pi}  d  \ph i_n
{  {  E_{\nu} n p^ 2 k } \over { E_p E_n\vert  { \ vecn }+ {\v ec p} \ v er t } }
{ 1\o ver  4 }  \ sum_{ spi ns}
 \v ert M_{f i  }{\ vert}^{2} ~, \ en d{aligned} $$
where the i nte gratio nint e rvals  of  nucl eon mo m enta,which com es from t h e Pauli b lo ckin g in nuclear matt e r, are calculated  in de ta i le d kin ema tics and $ k_ F$ is the Fer m im o m ent u m. For finite  nuclei, we nee d to k no w t h e corr espon di n g m uon wave fu ncti ons and $ k_F$ v a lues, b u t which  depen dsonthem od el . W ea lre a dy  su g ges ted a mo de l[@Ch9 7] f o r t hispur pose , but  will be skip ped  her e  an d con centr ateon  thecase o f nuc le ar matter.

Res ults  and Disc uss io ns== ===== = ====== === === ===

Ou r resul t s f or R M Con proton are show ni n  F ig.1. Th e soli d  c ur v e is the  s pec trum o btain ed i n  r ef. 2.,i.e. t h ere sult wi th out $\ De lta  M_ e$ te r m fo r ${\h at g}_P= 9.8 $ . On the other hand, the dot t ed c ur v e is  ca lculated wi thou t  $\D elta M_ e$t erm f or ${ \h a tg }_P$ = 6.77. This c ur ve isobvio usly much low er than th e s olid cur ve.W he n  $\Delta M_e$termis taken i n to accou nt fo r ${\hat  g}_P$ =6 . 77, we o bta inthe  da s h ed  curve whichi s  ver yclose t o t he soli d c urv e f orth e energyspectrum  o n$k  \ ge60 Me V $. The m in ordi scr epanc y  may b e due  toth en egl ect ofh ig h e r or de rcont rib ut ionsando the r degre e of free dom such  a s$\Delta $. Our result  s hows that$\ Del ta M_e $ term res tores the credit of ${\ h at g}_P  =6.77$ .

T he number  of  RMC p hot o ns obs ervedfor $ k\ge 6 0 MeV $  i s 2 79  $\pm$ 26a n d t he nu mb er o f those  from the solid cu r veis 299, while  ou r re s u lt  ob t ai n edby int e g rating the dott ed curve s pe c tr um is 273. Sin ce  the co ntribut ion o f  $\Delt a$ degree  of freed om  isk n own  to be a f ew perce nt [@Be87 ] , iti snot i ncl uded i nthe  pres ent ca l cul ation . Vect or  meson s suc has $\rho $ and $\omega$ are also  turne d out  to  have ver y s m all  contribu tion s in thiscal cul ation . H i gherorde r  t erm s  arepoin t ed out to be  in s i gn ificant [@F e 8 0 ].
It i s c o nfirme d
_{max}} dn_ \nonumber_\\ 
& & \int_{0}^{_2 \pi}_d_\phi_n 
{__{  E_{\nu}_n p^2 k_} \over { E_p_E_n \vert {\vec_n}_+ {\vec p} \vert}}
{1 \over 4} \sum_{spins}
 \vert M_{f i } {\vert}^{2} ~,\end{aligned}$$

where the_integration_intervals of_nucleon_momenta,_which comes from the Pauli_blocking in nuclear matter, are_calculated in_detailed kinematics and $k_F$ is the Fermi momentum._For_finite nuclei, we_need to know the corresponding muon wave functions and_$k_F$ values, but which depends on_the model. We_already_suggested_a model [@Ch97] for_this purpose, but will be skipped_here and concentrate on the case_of nuclear matter.

Results and Discussions
=======================

Our results for_RMC on proton are shown in_Fig.1. The solid curve is_the spectrum_obtained in ref. 2., i.e._the result without_$\Delta M_e$_term for ${\hat_g}_P = 9.8$. On the other_hand, the dotted_curve is calculated without $\Delta M_e$_term_for ${\hat g}_P$_=_6.77._This curve_is obviously much_lower_than the_solid_curve. When $\Delta M_e$ term is_taken_into account for ${\hat g}_P$ = 6.77,_we obtain the dashed_curve_which is very close_to the solid curve for_the energy spectrum on $k \ge_60 MeV$._The minor_discrepancy may be due to the neglect of higher order contributions_and other degree of freedom such_as $\Delta$. Our result_shows that_$\Delta_M_e$ term restores_the_credit of_${\hat g}_P = 6.77$.

The number of RMC_photons observed_for $k \ge 60 MeV $_is 279 $\pm$ 26_and_the number of those from the_solid curve is 299, while our_result obtained by integrating the_dotted_curve_spectrum is 273. Since the_contribution of $\Delta$ degree of freedom_is known to_be a few percent [@Be87], it is_not_included in the present calculation. Vector_mesons_such as $\rho$ and $\omega$ are_also_turned_out to have very small_contributions in this calculation. Higher order_terms are pointed out to be insignificant [@Fe80].

It is_confirmed