mu),\mathbb{R})$ and $\mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\textrm{B}}\rightarrow f(X)$ does not exist, the alternate approach of regularization was adopted in [@Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995] to rewrite $\mu_{\nu}\phi(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2$ as $\mu_{\nu\varepsilon}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2$ with $\mu_{\nu\varepsilon}:=\mu-(\nu+i\varepsilon)$ being a net of bijective functions for $\varepsilon>0$; this is a consequence of the fact that for the multiplication operator every nonreal $\lambda$ belongs to the resolvent set of the operator. The family of solutions of the later equation is given by [@Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995] $$\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=\frac{c\nu}{2}\frac{\nu-\mu}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}+\frac{\lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)}{\pi_{\varepsilon}}\frac{\varepsilon}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\label{Eqn: phieps}$$

where the required normalization $\int_{-1}^{1}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=1$ gives

$$\begin{array}{ccl}
{\displaystyle \lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)} & = & {\displaystyle \frac{\pi_{\varepsilon}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\varepsilon+\tan^{-1}(1-\nu)/\varepsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\nu}{4}\ln\frac{(1+\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}{(1-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\right)}\\
 & \overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow & \pi\lambda(\nu)\end{array}$$

with $$\pi_{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{d\mu}{\mu^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}=2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow\pi.$$

These discretized equations should be compared with the corresponding exact ones of Appendix A4. We shall see that the net of functions (\[Eqn: phieps\]) converges graphically to the multifunction Eq. (\[Eqn: singular\_eigen\]) as $\varepsilon\rightarrow0$.

In the discretized spectral
mu),\mathbb{R})$ and $ \mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\textrm{B}}\rightarrow f(X)$ does not exist, the alternate approach of regularization was adopted in [ @Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995 ] to rewrite $ \mu_{\nu}\phi(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2 $ as $ \mu_{\nu\varepsilon}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2 $ with $ \mu_{\nu\varepsilon}:=\mu-(\nu+i\varepsilon)$ being a net of bijective function for $ \varepsilon>0 $; this is a consequence of the fact that for the generation operator every nonreal $ \lambda$ belongs to the solvent set of the hustler. The family of solutions of the late equality is given by [ @Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995 ] $ $ \phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=\frac{c\nu}{2}\frac{\nu-\mu}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}+\frac{\lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)}{\pi_{\varepsilon}}\frac{\varepsilon}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\label{Eqn: phieps}$$ 

 where the required normalization $ \int_{-1}^{1}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=1 $ gives 

 $ $ \begin{array}{ccl } 
 { \displaystyle \lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu) } & = & { \displaystyle \frac{\pi_{\varepsilon}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\varepsilon+\tan^{-1}(1-\nu)/\varepsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\nu}{4}\ln\frac{(1+\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}{(1-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\right)}\\ 
  & \overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow & \pi\lambda(\nu)\end{array}$$ 

 with $ $ \pi_{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{d\mu}{\mu^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}=2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow\pi.$$ 

 These discretized equations should be compare with the corresponding exact one of Appendix A4. We shall determine that the net of functions (\[Eqn: phieps\ ]) converges graphically to the multifunction Eq. (\[Eqn: singular\_eigen\ ]) as $ \varepsilon\rightarrow0$. 

 In the discretized spectral
mu),\mwthbb{R})$ and $\mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\ttxtrm{B}}\rightarrow y(Z)$ does not esist, the alternate approach of regulerizqtion was adopted in [@Sengupga1988; @Sengupna1995] to reweite $\nu_{\nu}\phi(\mu,\nn)=-d\nu/2$ as $\mu_{\nu\vadcpsilmi}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\mo,\nu)=-c\nu/2$ with $\ku_{\nu\varepsilon}:=\ku-(\vu+n\varepsilon)$ being a net of bijective functipnd for $\varepsiljn>0$; tnys ia a consequence of the fact that fkr the kultiplicatiom operator every nonreal $\lwmbdw$ belongs to the rfsolvent sej of rhe operator. The familj of solutikns of the later equation is gixen bv [@Sengupta1988; @Webguoja1995] $$\phi_{\varepsmlon}(\nu,\iu)=\frac{c\nu}{2}\frag{\mu-\mu}{(\mu-\tu)^{2}+\varepxilon^{2}}+\frac{\lambds_{\vacepsulon}(\nu)}{\pi_{\varepsilon}}\frar{\varepsilon}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepfilon^{2}}\laben{Esn: phieps}$$

where thw eequited nmrmauuzagioh $\mnt_{-1}^{1}\lhi_{\varfpsmlon}(\nu,\mu)=1$ gibes

$$\begin{arrqy}{ccl}
{\displaystyle \lsmfea_{\varepsilon}(\nh)} & = & {\dys[laystyle \frac{\pi_{\varepsilon}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\varepsilmn+\tzn^{-1}(1-\nu)/\varepsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\bu}{4}\ln\frac{(1+\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}{(1-\no)^{2}+\varepsilog^{2}}\right)}\\
 & \overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow & \pi\lemcda(\um)\cnd{afeaj}$$

with $$\pi_{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{d\mu}{\mu^{2}+\varepfjlpn^{2}}=2\nan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsllon}\right)\overset{\vateosojon\rightarrow0}\uongriygtzrrow\pi.$$

These discrftized gquatiins shoulq be compared with the correspobding exact jbes of Appendix A4. Ce shall see thaj the met of functions (\[Eqn: phneps\]) cknverges grwphically go the multifuncgiok Ex. (\[Eqn: singular\_eigen\]) as $\varqpsilon\rijhtarxow0$.

In thd dixcretised spectrwl
mu),\mathbb{R})$ and $\mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\textrm{B}}\rightarrow f(X)$ does not exist, approach regularization was in [@Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995] with being a net bijective functions for this is a consequence of the that for the multiplication operator every nonreal $\lambda$ belongs to the resolvent set the operator. The family of solutions of the later equation is given by @Sengupta1995] phieps}$$ the normalization $\int_{-1}^{1}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=1$ gives $$\begin{array}{ccl} {\displaystyle \lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)} & = & {\displaystyle \frac{\pi_{\varepsilon}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\varepsilon+\tan^{-1}(1-\nu)/\varepsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\nu}{4}\ln\frac{(1+\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}{(1-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\right)}\\ & \overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow & \pi\lambda(\nu)\end{array}$$ with These discretized equations should be compared with the exact ones of Appendix We shall see that the of (\[Eqn: phieps\]) graphically the Eq. (\[Eqn: singular\_eigen\]) $\varepsilon\rightarrow0$. In the discretized spectral
mu),\mathbb{R})$ and $\mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\tExtrm{B}}\righTarroW f(X)$ DoeS nOt exIst, tHe alternate appROach Of regularization was adoPted iN [@SENgupTA1988; @SEngupTa1995] to rewRItE $\MU_{\nu}\PhI(\mU,\nu)=-C\nU/2$ As $\Mu_{\nu\vArePsilon}\pHi_{\varepsilOn}(\mU,\nU)=-c\nu/2$ with $\mu_{\nu\VArEpsilon}:=\mu-(\nU+i\vArepsilon)$ beiNg a Net of bIjEctIVe funCtiOns foR $\varepSIlon>0$; thIs is a consEqUEnce of THe fact tHAT fOr thE multiplication opERaTOr every nonreal $\Lambda$ BeLOnGS To tHe rEsolvent seT oF the oPErator. THE fAMILy oF Solutions of thE later equatIOn iS given By [@senGUpta1988; @SeNguptA1995] $$\pHI_{\vaRepsilon}(\nu,\mU)=\fraC{c\nu}{2}\frac{\nU-\mu}{(\mu-\nU)^{2}+\VarepsiLOn^{2}}+\frac{\lAmbda_{\vArePsiLon}(\nU)}{\Pi_{\VaRepSiLOn}}\fRAc{\VarEPsiLon}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\vArEpSilon^{2}}\LabeL{eQN: PhiePs}$$

wHere The reQuired normaliZatIon $\iNT_{-1}^{1}\phI_{\varePsiloN}(\nu,\mU)=1$ gIves

$$\bEgin{arRay}{ccL}
{\dIsplaystyle \lambDa_{\vaRepsilon}(\nU)} & = & {\diSpLayStYle \frAC{\pi_{\varEpsIloN}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\vArepsilON+\taN^{-1}(1-\nU)/\VARePsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\nu}{4}\lN\fRAC{(1+\nU)^{2}+\varepsiLon^{2}}{(1-\nu)^{2}+\vARePsILon^{2}}\right)}\\
 & \OvErsEt{\vaREPsiloN\rigHTaRrow0}\longRightaRRoW & \pI\lambda(\Nu)\End{arrAy}$$

WitH $$\pi_{\VarepSIlon}=\VarepsIlon\int_{-1}^{1}\fRac{d\mU}{\Mu^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}=2\taN^{-1}\Left(\frac{1}{\varepSIlON}\RiGHt)\ovErsEt{\varepsiloN\rigHTarrOw0}\loNGrIghTArrow\Pi.$$

TheSe DIsCRetized equations shoUlD be comPared With the corresPonding exaCT ONes of AppEndiX a4. WE Shall see that thE net oF functions (\[eQn: phieps\]) ConveRges grapHically to THE multifuNctIon eq. (\[EQn: sINGuLar\_eigen\]) as $\varEPSiloN\rIghtarrOw0$.

IN the disCreTizEd sPecTrAl
mu),\mathbb{R})$ and $\mu_ {\nu\textr m{B}} \!: X_{ \t extr m{B} }\rightarrow f ( X)$does not exist, the al terna te appr o ac h ofregular i za t i onwa sado pt e din [@ Sen gupta19 88; @Sengu pta 19 95] to rewri t e$\mu_{\nu} \ph i(\mu,\nu)=- c\n u/2$ a s$\m u _{\nu \va repsi lon}\p h i_{\va repsilon} (\ m u,\nu) = -c\nu/2 $ wi th $ \mu_{\nu\varepsil o n} : =\mu-(\nu+i\va repsil on ) $b e ing  anet of bij ec tivef unction s  f o r $\v a repsilon>0$;this is a c o nse quence  o f t h e fact  that  f o r t he multipli cati on operat or eve r y nonre a l $\lam bda$ b elo ngs  tot he  r eso lv e nts et  of the  operato r.  T he fa mily o f solu tio ns o f the  later equati onis g i ven  by [ @Seng upta 19 88; @ Sengup ta199 5]  $$\phi_{\varep silo n}(\nu,\m u)= \f rac {c \nu}{ 2 }\frac {\n u-\ mu}{(\m u-\nu)^ { 2}+ \v a r e ps ilon^{2}}+\frac{\l am b d a_ {\vareps ilon}( \ nu )} { \pi_{\va re psi lon} } \ frac{ \var e ps ilon}{(\ mu-\nu ) ^{ 2} +\varep si lon^{2 }} \la bel {Eqn: phie ps}$$
where t he re q uired normaliz a tion $\int_{- 1 }^ { 1 }\ p hi_{ \va repsilon}(\ nu,\ m u)=1 $ gi v es 

$ $ \begi n{arr ay } {c c l}
{\displaystyle \ la mbda_{ \vare psilon}(\nu)}  & = & {\d i s p laystyle  \fr a c{ \ pi_{\varepsilo n}}{\ tan^{-1}(1 + \nu)/\va repsi lon+\tan ^{-1}(1-\ n u )/\varep sil on} \le ft( 1 - \f rac{c\nu}{4}\ l n \fra c{ (1+\nu) ^{2 }+\vare psi lon ^{2 }}{ (1 -\nu)^{2} +\vareps il on ^{ 2} }\r ight) } \\
 & \o ve rse t{ \va repsi l on\rig htarr ow0} \l on g rig htarrow &\ p i\la mb da (\nu )\e nd {arra y}$$ 
wi th $$\p i_{\varep sil o n}=\ va re psilon\ int_{-1}^{1}\ fr ac{d\mu}{\ mu ^{2 }+\var e p silon^{2 }}=2\tan^{-1}\left(\fra c {1}{\va rep silon }\ri ght)\over set {\vare psi l on\rig htarro w0}\l on gri g h tarro w \ pi .$$ 
These disc r e tiz ed eq ua tion s shoul d be compared with the  correspondin g e xact o ne s o f  A p pen di x  A4 . We shall see th at the net  o f  f unctions ( \ [Eq n:  phieps \]) con verge s  graphi cally tothe multi fu ncti o n  Eq . (\[Eqn:singular \_eigen\] )  as $ \ va repsi lon \right ar row 0$.
In the dis creti zed sp ec tral
mu),\mathbb{R})$ and_$\mu_{\nu\textrm{B}}\!:X_{\textrm{B}}\rightarrow f(X)$_does not exist, the_alternate approach_of_regularization was_adopted_in [@Sengupta1988; @Sengupta1995]_to rewrite $\mu_{\nu}\phi(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2$_as $\mu_{\nu\varepsilon}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\mu,\nu)=-c\nu/2$ with $\mu_{\nu\varepsilon}:=\mu-(\nu+i\varepsilon)$_being a net_of_bijective functions for $\varepsilon>0$; this is a consequence of the fact that for the_multiplication_operator every_nonreal_$\lambda$_belongs to the resolvent set_of the operator. The family_of solutions_of the later equation is given by [@Sengupta1988;_@Sengupta1995]_$$\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=\frac{c\nu}{2}\frac{\nu-\mu}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}+\frac{\lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)}{\pi_{\varepsilon}}\frac{\varepsilon}{(\mu-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\label{Eqn: phieps}$$

where the_required normalization $\int_{-1}^{1}\phi_{\varepsilon}(\nu,\mu)=1$ gives

$$\begin{array}{ccl}
{\displaystyle \lambda_{\varepsilon}(\nu)} & = & {\displaystyle_\frac{\pi_{\varepsilon}}{\tan^{-1}(1+\nu)/\varepsilon+\tan^{-1}(1-\nu)/\varepsilon}\left(1-\frac{c\nu}{4}\ln\frac{(1+\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}{(1-\nu)^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}\right)}\\
 & \overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow & \pi\lambda(\nu)\end{array}$$

with $$\pi_{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{d\mu}{\mu^{2}+\varepsilon^{2}}=2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\overset{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\longrightarrow\pi.$$

These_discretized equations should_be_compared_with the corresponding exact_ones of Appendix A4. We shall_see that the net of functions_(\[Eqn: phieps\]) converges graphically to the multifunction_Eq. (\[Eqn: singular\_eigen\]) as $\varepsilon\rightarrow0$.

In the_discretized spectral