 r_0^{-5/6}$ according to @Roddier81. Assuming that $\sigma_{\rm PWV}$ is also proportional to $\langle {\rm PWV} \rangle$, the average PWV content, its value at Dome C can then be obtained by means of a comparison with the data obtained at temperate sites: $$\sigma_{\rm PWV} ({\rm DC}) = \frac{\langle {\rm PWV} \rangle_{\rm DC}} {\langle {\rm PWV}
\rangle_i} \left( \frac{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{r_{0,\,i}} \right)^{-5/6} \sigma_{\rm PWV} (i) \;,
\label{eq:pwv}$$ where $i$ represents a (well-characterised) temperate site. The application of this relation with the atmospheric parameters of either Cerro Paranal or Mauna Kea taken as a reference gives very similar estimates of 1.0 and 0.91 $\mu$m for $\sigma_{\rm PWV}$ at Dome C (see Table \[tab:pwv\]), using an average PWV content of 250 $\mu$m for Dome C. For this calculation, we assumed a seeing of $0\farcs27$, which is valid only above 30 m [@Lawrence04]. Using this value is recommended in the present case for two reasons: on one hand, telescopes are contemplated to be placed above the turbulent ground layer, and on the other hand, the study of @Bussmann05 shows that most of the PWV is concentrated between 200 m and 2 km above the ground, so that water vapour seeing is suspected to be only weakly affected by the ground layer.

Atmospheric transmission and sky brightness
-------------------------------------------

Another benefit from the low water vapour content is to widen and improve the overall transmission of the infrared atmospheric windows. @Lawrence04b shows that the $K$ band is extended up to 2.5 $\mu$m and the $L$ band from 2.9 to 4.2 $\mu$m. The transmission of the $M$ band around 5 $\mu$m is also significantly improved.

The infrared sky brightness is also partially determined by the water vapour content, which affects its wavelength-dependent emissivity factor. The other parameter influencing the sky emission is its effective temperature, which depends
r_0^{-5/6}$ according to @Roddier81. Assuming that $ \sigma_{\rm PWV}$ is also proportional to $ \langle { \rm PWV } \rangle$, the average PWV contentedness, its value at Dome   C can then be prevail by means of a comparison with the data obtained at temperate site: $ $ \sigma_{\rm PWV } ({ \rm DC }) = \frac{\langle { \rm PWV } \rangle_{\rm DC } } { \langle { \rm PWV } 
 \rangle_i } \left (\frac{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{r_{0,\,i } } \right)^{-5/6 } \sigma_{\rm PWV } (i) \; , 
 \label{eq: pwv}$$ where $ i$ represents a (well - characterised) temperate web site. The application of this relation with the atmospheric parameters of either Cerro Paranal or Mauna Kea learn as a reference gives very exchangeable estimates of 1.0 and 0.91   $ \mu$m for $ \sigma_{\rm PWV}$ at Dome   C (see Table   \[tab: pwv\ ]), use an average PWV contentedness of 250   $ \mu$m for Dome   C. For this calculation, we assumed a seeing of $ 0\farcs27 $, which is valid merely above 30   m [ @Lawrence04 ]. Using this value is recommended in the present case for two rationality: on one hand, telescopes are contemplated to be placed above the disruptive ground layer, and on the other hand, the study of @Bussmann05 prove that most of the PWV is concentrated between 200   m and 2   km above the ground, so that water vapor seeing is suspected to be only weakly affected by the ground layer. 

 Atmospheric transmission and sky brightness 
 ------------------------------------------- 

 Another benefit from the low water vapor content is to widen and better the overall transmittance of the infrared atmospheric windows. @Lawrence04b shows that the $ K$ band is offer up to 2.5   $ \mu$m and the $ L$ band from 2.9 to 4.2   $ \mu$m. The transmission of the $ M$ band around 5   $ \mu$m is also importantly improved. 

 The infrared sky brightness is also partially determined by the water vapour content, which affects its wavelength - dependent emissivity factor. The other parameter charm the sky emission is its effective temperature, which depend
 r_0^{-5/6}$ wccording to @Roddier81. Assmming that $\sigma_{\tm PWV}$ iv also proportkonal to $\langle {\rm PWV} \ranglx$, thw aveeage PWV content, its vxlue at Dlme C can thei be obtained by means on a cklparnsin with the daja obtained dt temperate shtds: $$\sigma_{\rm PWV} ({\rm DC}) = \frac{\langle {\rm PRV} \rangke_{\gm DC}} {\langle {\ri PWN}
\rwngls_p} \oeft( \frac{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{r_{0,\,i}} \right)^{-5/6} \sigma_{\dm PWV} (p) \;,
\label{eq:pwv}$$ wherr $i$ represents a (well-charafterlsed) temperate sitf. The applixatijb of this reuation with the atmospgeric parameters of either Cerru Parcnal or Mauba Kew taken as a refegence gives vcgy siminar estomates of 1.0 and 0.91 $\mu$k fir $\sigma_{\rm PWV}$ at Domx C (see Table \[tab:pwv\]), ufing an aeexage PWV content of 250 $\my$m for Gome W. Fof thks dakchlatioj, wx assumed a seeing of $0\darcs27$, which is valic jbly above 30 m [@Lzwrencq04]. Tsing this value is recommended in the kreseht case for two reasons: on one hand, telescopgs are coneemplated to be placed above the turbulent ground layec, xnd ok thd ohher hand, the study of @Bussmann05 shows that moff pf the PWV is cokcentrated between 200 m amq 2 km above thg grounb, sk that water vapoug seeind is wuspected to ne only weakly affected by rhe ground lcyee.

Atmospheric translission and sky brigntness
-------------------------------------------

Another benefit fxom ths low water vapour ckvtent is to widev akd hmprove ufe overall transmyssion of the infrardd ajmosphewic windowd. @Lawvance04b shows that tje $K$ yand hs extendef up to 2.5 $\mu$m and the $L$ band from 2.9 to 4.2 $\mu$m. The ttanvmivsion of the $K$ band around 5 $\mu$m is also sngnificautly ioproved.

The infrarxd sky brigheness is also kartially detxrmined br thw warer vapujr content, whivh affects its waveoength-dependent emlssivkfy factor. The ocket parameter infkuevcigg tie skr emission is its efwrctivd temperatuve, dhicn depends
r_0^{-5/6}$ according to @Roddier81. Assuming that $\sigma_{\rm also to $\langle PWV} \rangle$, the at C can then obtained by means a comparison with the data obtained temperate sites: $$\sigma_{\rm PWV} ({\rm DC}) = \frac{\langle {\rm PWV} \rangle_{\rm DC}} {\langle PWV} \rangle_i} \left( \frac{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{r_{0,\,i}} \right)^{-5/6} \sigma_{\rm PWV} (i) \;, \label{eq:pwv}$$ where $i$ a temperate The of this relation with the atmospheric parameters of either Cerro Paranal or Mauna Kea taken as reference gives very similar estimates of 1.0 and $\mu$m for $\sigma_{\rm PWV}$ Dome C (see Table \[tab:pwv\]), an PWV content 250 for C. For this we assumed a seeing of $0\farcs27$, which is valid only above 30 m [@Lawrence04]. Using this value recommended in case for reasons: one telescopes are contemplated placed above the turbulent ground layer, other hand, the study of @Bussmann05 shows that of the is concentrated between 200 m and km above the ground, so that water vapour is suspected to be only weakly affected by the ground layer. Atmospheric transmission and sky Another benefit from the water vapour content to and the transmission of infrared atmospheric windows. @Lawrence04b shows that the $K$ band is extended to 2.5 $\mu$m and the $L$ band from 2.9 to The of the $M$ around 5 $\mu$m is significantly The infrared sky brightness partially by content, affects wavelength-dependent emissivity factor. The parameter influencing the sky emission its effective temperature, which
 r_0^{-5/6}$ according to @Roddier81. AssumiNg that $\sigmA_{\rm PWv}$ is AlsO pRopoRtioNal to $\langle {\rm Pwv} \ranGle$, the average PWV contenT, its vAlUE at DOMe c can tHen be obTAiNED by MeAnS of A cOMpArisoN wiTh the daTa obtained At tEmPerate sites: $$\sIGmA_{\rm PWV} ({\rm DC}) = \FraC{\langle {\rm PWV} \RanGle_{\rm Dc}} {\lAngLE {\rm PWv}
\raNgle_i} \Left( \frAC{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{R_{0,\,i}} \right)^{-5/6} \siGmA_{\Rm PWV} (i) \;,
\LAbel{eq:pWV}$$ WhEre $i$ Represents a (well-chARaCTerised) temperaTe site. thE ApPLIcaTioN of this relAtIon wiTH the atmOSpHERIc pARameters of eitHer Cerro ParANal Or MaunA KEa tAKen as a ReferEnCE giVes very simiLar eStimates oF 1.0 and 0.91 $\mu$M For $\sigmA_{\Rm PWV}$ at dome C (sEe TAblE \[tab:PWv\]), UsIng An AVerAGe pWV COntEnt of 250 $\mu$m FoR DOme C. FOr thIS CALculAtiOn, we AssumEd a seeing of $0\faRcs27$, WhicH Is vAlid oNly abOve 30 m [@laWrencE04]. Using This vAlUe is recommended In thE present cAse FoR twO rEasonS: On one hAnd, TelEscopes Are contEMplAtED TO bE placed above the turBuLENt Ground laYer, and ON tHe OTher hand, ThE stUdy oF @bUssmaNn05 shOWs That most Of the Pwv iS cOncentrAtEd betwEeN 200 m aNd 2 kM abovE The gRound, sO that watEr vapOUr seeing is suspECted to be only wEAkLY AfFEcteD by The ground laYer.

ATMospHeriC TrAnsMIssioN and sKy BRiGHtness
-------------------------------------------

Another benefiT fRom the Low waTer vapour contEnt is to widEN ANd improvE the OVeRAll transmissioN of thE infrared aTMospheriC windOws. @LawreNce04b shows THAt the $K$ baNd iS exTenDed UP To 2.5 $\Mu$m and the $L$ banD FRom 2.9 tO 4.2 $\mU$m. The trAnsMission Of tHe $M$ BanD arOuNd 5 $\mu$m is alSo signifIcAnTlY iMprOved.

THE infrareD sKy bRiGhtNess iS Also paRtialLy deTeRmINed By the waTEr VAPour CoNtEnt, wHicH aFfectS its WAveLength-dEpendent eMisSIvitY fAcTor. The oTher parameter InFluencing tHe Sky EmissiON Is its effEctive temperature, which dEPends
 r_0^{-5/6}$ according to@Roddier81 . Ass umi ngth at $ \sig ma_{\rm PWV}$i s al so proportional to $\l angle  { \ rm P W V}  \ran gle$, t h ea v era ge  P WVco n te nt, i tsvalue a t Dome C c anth en be obtain e dby means o f a  comparisonwit h theda tao btain edat te mperat e  sites : $$\sigm a_ { \rm PW V } ({\rm D C} ) =\frac{\langle {\r m  P W V} \rangle_{\r m DC}}  { \ la n g le{\r m PWV}
\ra ng le_i} \left(\ fr a c { r_{ 0 ,\,{\rm DC}}} {r_{0,\,i}} \ri ght)^{ -5 /6} \sigma _{\rm  P W V}(i) \;,
\la bel{ eq:pwv}$$  where $i$ rep r esentsa (wel l-c har acte r is ed ) t em p era t esit e . T he appli ca ti on of  thi s r e lati onwith  theatmospheric p ara mete r s o f eit her C erro  P arana l or M aunaKe a taken as a re fere nce gives  ve ry  si mi lar e s timate s o f 1 .0 and0.91 $\ m u$m  f o r $\ sigma_{\rm PWV}$ a tD o me  C (seeTable\ [t ab : pwv\]),us ing  ana v erage  PWV co ntent of  250 $ \ mu $m  for Do me  C. Fo rthi s c alcul a tion , we a ssumed a  seei n g of $0\farcs2 7 $, which is v a li d on l y ab ove  30 m [@Law renc e 04].  Usi n gthi s  valu e isre c om m ended in the presen tcase f or tw o reasons: on  one hand, t e lescopes  are co n templated to b e pla ced abovet he turbu lentground l ayer, and o n the ot her  ha nd,  th e st udy of @Bussm a n n05sh ows tha t m ost ofthe  PW V i s c on centrated  between  2 00  m  a nd2 kma bove the  g rou nd , s o tha t  water  vapo ur s ee in g  is  suspec t ed t o be  o nl y we akl yaffec tedb y t he grou nd layer. 

A t mosp he ri c trans mission and s ky  brightnes s--- ------ - - -------- ----------------------- - 

Anoth erbenef it f rom the l owwatervap o ur con tent i s towi den a nd im p r ov e t he  overall t r a nsm issio nof t he infr ared atmospheric w i ndo ws. @Lawrence 04b  sho w s  t hat th e  $K $b and i s extended up t o 2.5 $\mu $m an d the $L$b and  f rom 2.9  to 4.2  $\mu $ m. Thetransmiss ion of th e$M$b a ndaround 5 $ \mu$m is  also sig n ifica n tl y imp rov ed.

T he  in frare d skyb rig htnes s is a ls o part ially  d etermine d by the water vapour c ontent , whi chaffects i tsw ave length-de pend ent emissi vit y f actor . T h e oth er p a ra met e r inf luen c ing the s k yemi s s io n is its ef f e c tiv e tem per a ture,whic h depends
 r_0^{-5/6}$_according to_@Roddier81. Assuming that $\sigma_{\rm_PWV}$ is_also_proportional to_$\langle_{\rm PWV} \rangle$,_the average PWV_content, its value at_Dome C can then_be_obtained by means of a comparison with the data obtained at temperate sites: $$\sigma_{\rm_PWV}_({\rm DC})_=_\frac{\langle_{\rm PWV} \rangle_{\rm DC}} {\langle_{\rm PWV}
\rangle_i} \left( \frac{r_{0,\,{\rm DC}}}{r_{0,\,i}}_\right)^{-5/6} \sigma_{\rm_PWV} (i) \;,
\label{eq:pwv}$$ where $i$ represents a (well-characterised)_temperate_site. The application_of this relation with the atmospheric parameters of either_Cerro Paranal or Mauna Kea taken_as a reference_gives_very_similar estimates of 1.0_and 0.91 $\mu$m for $\sigma_{\rm PWV}$ at_Dome C (see Table \[tab:pwv\]), using an average_PWV content of 250 $\mu$m for Dome C. For_this calculation, we assumed a seeing_of $0\farcs27$, which is valid_only above_30 m [@Lawrence04]. Using this value_is recommended in_the present_case for two_reasons: on one hand, telescopes are_contemplated to be_placed above the turbulent ground layer,_and_on the other_hand,_the_study of_@Bussmann05 shows that_most_of the_PWV_is concentrated between 200 m and 2 km_above_the ground, so that water vapour seeing_is suspected to be_only_weakly affected by the_ground layer.

Atmospheric transmission and sky_brightness
-------------------------------------------

Another benefit from the low water_vapour content_is to_widen and improve the overall transmission of the infrared atmospheric windows._@Lawrence04b shows that the $K$ band_is extended up to_2.5 $\mu$m and_the_$L$ band from_2.9_to 4.2 $\mu$m._The transmission of the $M$ band around_5 $\mu$m is_also significantly improved.

The infrared sky brightness_is also partially determined_by_the water vapour content, which affects_its wavelength-dependent emissivity factor. The other_parameter influencing the sky emission_is_its_effective temperature, which depends