. For example, one may have recourse to scaling argument for $e_d$.[@lrvw07] We obtain $S_0^d  \propto T$ by $e_d \propto T^2$ normally, while at the QCP, $S_0^d \propto T\log T^{-1}$ according to $e_d \propto T^2\log T^{-1}$. In terms of the electronic heat capacity $C$, one may substitute $e_d=CT $ to obtain $S_0^d \simeq  C /(n_d e)$, or $$q\equiv \frac{e S}{ C }
= \frac{1}{n},
%= \frac{1}{n_s+ n_d},
\label{qequiv es/c}$$ where $n\equiv n_s+ n_d$ and $S\simeq S_0 \simeq n_d S_0^d/ n $ under (\[s0dggs0s\]). For hole like carriers, following as in (\[Jss=-2e\]), we find that the number $n_d$ becomes negative with the absolute value $|n_d|$ representing the hole number. Thus our drag mechanism supports the material-independent universality in $q$ as revealed by Behnia $et$ $al$.[@BJF04] This is contrasted with the explanation by resorting to dominant impurity scatterings.[@MK05]

To go further to investigate the next order contributions, we have to consider not only those originating from the equilibrium quantities, which may be related to singular behaviour of the specific heat, but also the [*non-equilibrium*]{} effect which manifest itself in linear response to an applied field. The latter, though potentially important, has not been investigated before. In the next section, we focus ourselves to such singular contributions which vanish at zero field ${\bi E}=0$. We find similar temperature dependences as that expected from the equilibrium effect through (\[S0edTnde\]).

\[sec:std\]Sub-leading corrections
==================================

Extra currents
--------------

The effect of spin fluctuations on the single particle excitation of conduction electron is described by a particle self-energy $\Sigma({\bi k}, \varepsilon)$. The dragged spin fluctuations bring about a similar effect as those in equilibrium affect the thermodynamical properties.[@de66; @bmf68] We pay attention to the extra quas
. For example, one may have recourse to scaling argument for $ e_d$.[@lrvw07 ] We receive $ S_0^d   \propto T$ by $ e_d \propto T^2 $ normally, while at the QCP, $ S_0^d \propto T\log T^{-1}$ harmonize to $ e_d \propto T^2\log T^{-1}$. In terms of the electronic heat capacity $ C$, one may substitute $ e_d = CT $ to prevail $ S_0^d \simeq   C /(n_d e)$, or $ $ q\equiv \frac{e S } { C } 
 = \frac{1}{n }, 
% = \frac{1}{n_s+ n_d }, 
 \label{qequiv es / c}$$ where $ n\equiv n_s+ n_d$ and $ S\simeq S_0 \simeq n_d S_0^d/ n $ under (\[s0dggs0s\ ]). For hole like carriers, surveil as in (\[Jss=-2e\ ]), we find that the number $ n_d$ become negative with the absolute value $ |n_d|$ representing the trap number. Thus our puff mechanism supports the material - independent universality in $ q$ as revealed by Behnia $ et$ $ al$.[@BJF04 ] This is contrasted with the explanation by resorting to dominant impurity scatterings.[@MK05 ] 

 To move further to investigate the next club contributions, we have to consider not only those originate from the equilibrium quantities, which may be related to singular behaviour of the specific heat, but besides the [ * non - equilibrium * ] { } effect which manifest itself in linear response to an applied field. The latter, though potentially authoritative, has not been investigated before. In the next section, we focus ourselves to such singular contributions which vanish at zero field $ { \bi E}=0$. We find alike temperature dependences as that expected from the balance consequence through (\[S0edTnde\ ]). 

 \[sec: std\]Sub - leading corrections 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Extra stream 
 -------------- 

 The effect of spin fluctuations on the single atom excitation of conduction electron is described by a particle self - energy $ \Sigma({\bi k }, \varepsilon)$. The dragged spin fluctuations bring about a similar effect as those in equilibrium affect the thermodynamic properties.[@de66; @bmf68 ] We pay care to the extra quas
. Fog example, one may have rtcourse to scaliny argumxnt for $e_d$.[@lrvw07] De obtain $S_0^d  \propto T$ by $e_d \peopto T^2$ normally, while at tfe QCP, $S_0^d \propto R\log R^{-1}$ accordinj to $e_d \ixopto B^2\log C^{-1}$. Mn terms of the electroniw heat capacitf $Z$, lne may substitute $e_d=CT $ to obtain $F_0^d \simea  C /(n_d e)$, or $$q\eqoiv \fgas{e S}{ B }
= \frac{1}{n},
%= \frac{1}{n_s+ n_d},
\label{qequiv ea/c}$$ whert $n\equiv n_s+ n_d$ and $S\simeq S_0 \simeq n_d S_0^d/ n $ ujder (\[s0dggs0s\]). For hole llke carrierw, fojoowing as in (\[Jss=-2e\]), we fpud that the number $n_d$ becomes negative witf the absolute caoue $|t_d|$ represenving tre hole numbcg. Thus mur drab mechanism suiportv tye material-independenv universality in $q$ ws revealad by Behnia $et$ $al$.[@BHF04] This is wontfqstdd sivh fhe exolaiation by rssorting to dominant impurity xcwnyerings.[@MK05]

To fo furehqr to investigate the next order contritutjons, we have to considee not only those origlnating fwom the equilibrium quantities, which may be relatad to rinymjxe hehaviour of the specific heat, but also the [*njh-eauplibrium*]{} effect wmich manifest itsekf im linear respovse to an applied field. The latter, thouth potentyallu important, has not been incestigated bvforw. In the next sectnon, we focus ourxelvex to such singular contxibutikns which vwnish at adro field ${\bi E}=0$. Wd fpnd vimilar udmperature dependqnces as vhat zxpected frok the qquilibriul effcwt through (\[S0edTnde\]).

\[dec:stb\]Sub-laading corgections
==================================

Extra currents
--------------

The effecv of spin fluvtgatpons on tke sinnle particle exsitation of couduction elecgron is deacribed by a partisle self-energf $\Sigma({\bi k}, \verepsilon)$. The dratged spkv fluctuations bring about a simioar effect as thosc in gqhilibrium affecc uhw thermodynamival prjpvrtmes.[@de66; @tmf68] We pay adtengiov to tfe extra qucs
. For example, one may have recourse argument $e_d$.[@lrvw07] We $S_0^d \propto T$ while the QCP, $S_0^d T\log T^{-1}$ according $e_d \propto T^2\log T^{-1}$. In terms the electronic heat capacity $C$, one may substitute $e_d=CT $ to obtain $S_0^d C /(n_d e)$, or $$q\equiv \frac{e S}{ C } = \frac{1}{n}, %= \frac{1}{n_s+ \label{qequiv where n_s+ and $S\simeq S_0 \simeq n_d S_0^d/ n $ under (\[s0dggs0s\]). For hole like carriers, following as (\[Jss=-2e\]), we find that the number $n_d$ becomes with the absolute value representing the hole number. Thus drag supports the universality $q$ revealed by Behnia $al$.[@BJF04] This is contrasted with the explanation by resorting to dominant impurity scatterings.[@MK05] To go further to the next we have consider only originating from the which may be related to singular specific heat, but also the [*non-equilibrium*]{} effect which itself in response to an applied field. The though potentially important, has not been investigated before. the next section, we focus ourselves to such singular contributions which vanish at zero field We find similar temperature as that expected the effect (\[S0edTnde\]). corrections ================================== currents -------------- The effect of spin fluctuations on the single particle of conduction electron is described by a particle self-energy $\Sigma({\bi The spin fluctuations bring a similar effect as in affect the thermodynamical properties.[@de66; pay to
. For example, one may have recouRse to scaliNg argUmeNt fOr $E_d$.[@lrVw07] We Obtain $S_0^d  \propto t$ By $e_d \Propto T^2$ normally, while at The QCp, $S_0^D \PropTO T\Log T^{-1}$ aCcordinG To $E_D \ProPtO T^2\Log t^{-1}$. IN TeRms of The ElectroNic heat capAciTy $c$, one may substITuTe $e_d=CT $ to obTaiN $S_0^d \simeq  C /(n_d e)$, Or $$q\Equiv \fRaC{e S}{ c }
= \Frac{1}{n},
%= \FraC{1}{n_s+ n_d},
\Label{qEQuiv es/C}$$ where $n\eqUiV N_s+ n_d$ anD $s\simeq S_0 \SIMeQ n_d S_0^D/ n $ under (\[s0dggs0s\]). For hOLe LIke carriers, folLowing As IN (\[JSS=-2E\]), we FinD that the nuMbEr $n_d$ bEComes neGAtIVE WitH The absolute vaLue $|n_d|$ represENtiNg the hOlE nuMBer. ThuS our dRaG MecHanism suppoRts tHe materiaL-indepENdent unIVersaliTy in $q$ aS reVeaLed bY beHnIa $eT$ $aL$.[@bJF04] tHiS is COntRasted wiTh ThE explAnatION BY resOrtIng tO domiNant impurity sCatTeriNGs.[@Mk05]

To go FurthEr to InVestiGate thE next OrDer contributionS, we hAve to consIdeR nOt oNlY thosE OriginAtiNg fRom the eQuilibrIUm qUaNTITiEs, which may be relateD tO SInGular behAviour OF tHe SPecific hEaT, buT alsO THe [*non-EquiLIbRium*]{} effeCt whicH MaNiFest itsElF in linEaR reSpoNse to AN appLied fiEld. The laTter, tHOugh potentiallY Important, has nOT bEEN iNVestIgaTed before. In The nEXt seCtioN, We FocUS oursElves To SUcH Singular contributioNs Which vAnish At zero field ${\bi e}=0$. We find simILAR temperaTure DEpENdences as that eXpectEd from the eQUilibriuM effeCt througH (\[S0edTnde\]).

\[sEC:Std\]Sub-leAdiNg cOrrEctIONs
==================================

extra currents
--------------

tHE effEcT of spin FluCtuatioNs oN thE siNglE pArticle exCitation Of CoNdUcTioN elecTRon is desCrIbeD bY a pArticLE self-eNergy $\sigmA({\bI k}, \VArePsilon)$. THE dRAGged SpIn FlucTuaTiOns brIng aBOut A similaR effect as ThoSE in eQuIlIbrium aFfect the thermOdYnamical prOpErtIes.[@de66; @bMF68] we pay attEntion to the extra quas
. For example, one may hav e recourse  to s cal ing  a rgum entfor $e_d$.[@lr v w07]  We obtain $S_0^d  \pr optoT$ by $ e _d  \pro pto T^2 $  n o r mal ly ,whi le at  theQCP , $S_0^ d \proptoT\l og  T^{-1}$ acc o rd ing to $e_ d \ propto T^2\l ogT^{-1} $.  In terms  of  theelectr o nic he at capaci ty $C$, o n e may s u b st itut e $e_d=CT $ to ob t ai n  $S_0^d \simeq   C /( n_ d  e ) $ , o r $ $q\equiv \ fr ac{eS }{ C }=  \ f r a c{1 } {n},
%= \frac {1}{n_s+ n_ d },\label {q equ i v es/c }$$ w he r e $ n\equiv n_s + n_ d$ and $S \simeq S_0 \si m eq n_dS_0^d/  n$ u nder (\ [s 0dg gs 0 s\] ) .For hol e like c ar ri ers,foll o w i n g as  in  (\[ Jss=- 2e\]), we fin d t hatt henumbe r $n_ d$ b ec omesnegati ve wi th  the absolute v alue  $|n_d|$rep re sen ti ng th e  holenum ber . Thusour dra g  me ch a n i sm  supports the mate ri a l -i ndepende nt uni v er sa l ity in $ q$  as  rev e a led b y Be h ni a $et$ $ al$.[@ B JF 04 ] Thisis  contr as ted  wi th th e  exp lanati on by re sorti n g to dominanti mpurity scatt e ri n g s. [ @MK0 5]
To go furt hert o in vest i ga tet he ne xt or de r  c o ntributions, we hav eto con sider  not only tho se origina t i n g from t he e q ui l ibrium quantit ies,which mayb e relate d tosingular  behaviou r of the s pec ifi c h eat , bu t also the [* n o n-eq ui librium *]{ } effec t w hic h m ani fe st itself  in line ar  r es po nse  to a n  applied  f iel d.  Th e lat t er, th oughpote nt ia l lyimporta n t, h as n ot  b eeninv es tigat ed b e for e. In t he next s ect i on,we  f ocus ou rselves to su ch  singularco ntr ibutio n s  which v anish at zero field ${\ b i E}=0$ . W e fin d si milar tem per aturedep e ndence s as t hat e xp ect e d  from t he  eq ui librium ef f e ctthrou gh  (\[ S0edTnd e\]).

\[sec:std\] S ub- leading corre cti ons= = == === = == = === == = === = = ============

E xtra curre nt s 
- ---------- - --
T he effe ct of s pin f l uctuati ons on th e singlepa rtic l e  ex citation o f conduc tion elec t ron i s  d escri bed  by apa rti cle s elf-en e rgy  $\Si gma({\ bi  k}, \ varep si lon)$. T he dragged spin fluctua tionsbring  ab out a sim ila r  ef fect as t hose  in equili bri umaffec t t h e the rmod y na mic a l pro pert i es.[@de66 ;  @ bmf 6 8 ]We pay atte n t i onto th e e x tra qu as
. For_example, one_may have recourse to_scaling argument_for_$e_d$.[@lrvw07] We_obtain_$S_0^d  \propto_T$ by $e_d_\propto T^2$ normally, while_at the QCP,_$S_0^d_\propto T\log T^{-1}$ according to $e_d \propto T^2\log T^{-1}$. In terms of the electronic_heat_capacity $C$,_one_may_substitute $e_d=CT $ to obtain_$S_0^d \simeq  C /(n_d_e)$, or_$$q\equiv \frac{e S}{ C }
= \frac{1}{n},
%= \frac{1}{n_s+ n_d},
\label{qequiv_es/c}$$_where $n\equiv n_s+_n_d$ and $S\simeq S_0 \simeq n_d S_0^d/ n $_under (\[s0dggs0s\]). For hole like carriers,_following as in_(\[Jss=-2e\]),_we_find that the number_$n_d$ becomes negative with the absolute_value $|n_d|$ representing the hole number._Thus our drag mechanism supports the material-independent_universality in $q$ as revealed by_Behnia $et$ $al$.[@BJF04] This is_contrasted with_the explanation by resorting to_dominant impurity scatterings.[@MK05]

To_go further_to investigate the_next order contributions, we have to_consider not only_those originating from the equilibrium quantities,_which_may be related_to_singular_behaviour of_the specific heat,_but_also the_[*non-equilibrium*]{}_effect which manifest itself in linear_response_to an applied field. The latter, though_potentially important, has not_been_investigated before. In the_next section, we focus ourselves_to such singular contributions which vanish_at zero_field ${\bi_E}=0$. We find similar temperature dependences as that expected from the_equilibrium effect through (\[S0edTnde\]).

\[sec:std\]Sub-leading corrections
==================================

Extra currents
--------------

The_effect of spin fluctuations_on the_single_particle excitation of_conduction_electron is_described by a particle self-energy $\Sigma({\bi k},_\varepsilon)$. The_dragged spin fluctuations bring about a_similar effect as those_in_equilibrium affect the thermodynamical properties.[@de66; @bmf68]_We pay attention to the extra_quas