 in Ashtekar variables, the equivalent boundary term to takes the following form: $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi G\beta}\oint_{\delta \Sigma} \mathrm{d}S_a \frac{N}{\sqrt{E}} \left(E^a_i \bar{D}_b E^b_i + E^b_i \bar{D}_b E^a_i \right),\end{aligned}$$ where, similar to the derivative $\bar{\nabla}$ defined earlier, $\bar{D}$ is the covariant derivative compatible with the order zero component of the triad at infinity.

In our reduced theory, the boundary term is given by $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathfrak e}= -\frac{1}{4 G\beta}\oint_{\delta \sigma} \mathrm{d}s_a \frac{N}{\sqrt{e}} \left(\e^a_i \bar{D}_b \e^b_i + \e^b_i \bar{D}_b \e^a_i \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its evaluation in Cartesian coordinates agrees with the result given in.

Gauss constraint
----------------

The contribution to the action of the Gauss constraint in the full theory is given by $$\begin{aligned}
 \frac{1}{16\pi G}G(\vec\lambda)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma \lambda^i\left(\partial_aE^a_i+\varepsilon_{ijk}A^j_aE^a_k\right).\end{aligned}$$ The variation of this contribution also requires another boundary term in order to make the full variational problem well defined. It is given by $$\label{eq:Q}
{\cal Q}=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta} \oint_{\delta \Sigma} dS_a (E^a_i-\bar{E}^a_i) \lambda^i,$$ where $\bar{E}^a_i$ is the densitized triad at spatial infinity. Without this term, inserting the asymptotic form of the triad, the result is divergent. Since at spatial infinity the metric is flat, $\bar{E}^a_i$ is independent of $M$ and $J$. Therefore, any variational derivative of this term will be zero
in Ashtekar variables, the equivalent boundary term to takes the following form: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \cal E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi G\beta}\oint_{\delta \Sigma } \mathrm{d}S_a \frac{N}{\sqrt{E } } \left(E^a_i \bar{D}_b E^b_i + E^b_i \bar{D}_b E^a_i \right),\end{aligned}$$ where, exchangeable to the derivative $ \bar{\nabla}$ define earlier, $ \bar{D}$ is the covariant derivative compatible with the order zero part of the triad at infinity. 

 In our reduced hypothesis, the boundary terminus is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \mathfrak e}= -\frac{1}{4 G\beta}\oint_{\delta \sigma } \mathrm{d}s_a \frac{N}{\sqrt{e } } \left(\e^a_i \bar{D}_b \e^b_i + \e^b_i \bar{D}_b \e^a_i \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its evaluation in Cartesian coordinate match with the result give in. 

 Gauss constraint 
 ---------------- 

 The contribution to the action of the Gauss restraint in the full theory is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \frac{1}{16\pi G}G(\vec\lambda)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma \lambda^i\left(\partial_aE^a_i+\varepsilon_{ijk}A^j_aE^a_k\right).\end{aligned}$$ The variation of this contribution also requires another boundary term in ordering to make the full variational problem well define. It is given by $ $ \label{eq: Q } 
 { \cal Q}=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta } \oint_{\delta \Sigma } dS_a (E^a_i-\bar{E}^a_i) \lambda^i,$$ where $ \bar{E}^a_i$ is the densitized triad at spatial infinity. Without this term, insert the asymptotic form of the triad, the result is divergent. Since at spatial infinity the metric is flat, $ \bar{E}^a_i$ is autonomous of $ M$ and $ J$. Therefore, any variational derivative of this term will be zero
 in Ashtekar variables, the tquivalent boundaty term vo takea the foulowing form: $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi G\beta}\oint_{\delta \Sigoa} \mathrm{f}S_a \frac{B}{\sqru{E}} \left(E^a_i \bar{D}_b X^g_i + E^b_i \bar{D}_b C^a_i \rngit),\end{aligned}$$ whgre, similar do the derivathvd $\yar{\nabla}$ defined earlier, $\bar{D}$ is the covarisnh derivative cjmpauibje wjnh the order zero component of fhe tried at infinity.

Im our reduced theory, the blundwry term is given hy $$\begin{alitned}
{\iqthfrak e}= -\frxc{1}{4 G\beta}\oint_{\delta \sigmz} \mathrm{d}s_a \frac{N}{\sqrt{e}} \left(\e^a_i \car{D}_b \e^b_i + \e^b_i \vae{D}_b \g^a_i \right).\end{eligneq}$$ Its evaluabpon in Wartesisn coordinates agcees with the result givei in.

Gauss constraint
----------------

Jhe contritucion to the action of tye Gaoss cmnstfqing ih vhe full hhekry is givsn by $$\begin{qligned}
 \frac{1}{16\pi G}G(\vev\lwnbda)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\bsta}\int_\Fidma \lambda^i\left(\partial_aE^a_i+\varepsilon_{ijk}D^j_aS^a_k\right).\end{aligned}$$ The cariation of this conjribution wlso requires another boundary term in order to mdke tie fuol xqrlational problem well defined. It is given by $$\jzbtl{ea:Q}
{\cal Q}=\frac{1}{8\pi N\beta} \oint_{\delta \Sibmw} cF_a (E^a_i-\bar{E}^a_i) \uambda^n,$$ wgere $\bar{E}^a_i$ is the densityzed rriad at fpatoal infinity. Without this twrm, insertiny tye asymptotic form of the tricd, the resukt is divergent. Since ac spatjal infinitj the metdkc is flat, $\bar{E}^a_k$ ix hndependtvt of $M$ and $J$. Thewefore, anb varnational derovativq of this herm will be zero
in Ashtekar variables, the equivalent boundary term the form: $$\begin{aligned} E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi \bar{D}_b + E^b_i \bar{D}_b \right),\end{aligned}$$ where, similar the derivative $\bar{\nabla}$ defined earlier, $\bar{D}$ the covariant derivative compatible with the order zero component of the triad at In our reduced theory, the boundary term is given by $$\begin{aligned} {\mathfrak e}= G\beta}\oint_{\delta \mathrm{d}s_a \left(\e^a_i \e^b_i + \e^b_i \bar{D}_b \e^a_i \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its evaluation in Cartesian coordinates agrees with the result given Gauss constraint ---------------- The contribution to the action the Gauss constraint in full theory is given by \frac{1}{16\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma \lambda^i\left(\partial_aE^a_i+\varepsilon_{ijk}A^j_aE^a_k\right).\end{aligned}$$ variation this also requires another term in order to make the full variational problem well defined. It is given by $$\label{eq:Q} {\cal G\beta} \oint_{\delta (E^a_i-\bar{E}^a_i) \lambda^i,$$ $\bar{E}^a_i$ the triad at spatial this term, inserting the asymptotic form the result is divergent. Since at spatial infinity metric is $\bar{E}^a_i$ is independent of $M$ and Therefore, any variational derivative of this term will zero
 in Ashtekar variables, the equIvalent bouNdary TerM to TaKes tHe foLlowing form: $$\begIN{aliGned}
{\cal E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi G\beta}\oinT_{\deltA \SIGma} \mAThRm{d}S_a \Frac{N}{\sqRT{E}} \LEFt(E^A_i \BaR{D}_b e^b_I + e^b_I \bar{D}_B E^a_I \right),\eNd{aligned}$$ wHerE, sImilar to the dERiVative $\bar{\nAblA}$ defined earlIer, $\Bar{D}$ is ThE coVArianT deRivatIve comPAtible With the orDeR Zero coMPonent oF THe TriaD at infinity.

In our rEDuCEd theory, the bouNdary tErM Is GIVen By $$\bEgin{aligneD}
{\mAthfrAK e}= -\frac{1}{4 G\BEtA}\OINt_{\dELta \sigma} \mathrM{d}s_a \frac{N}{\sqRT{e}} \lEft(\e^a_i \BaR{D}_b \E^B_i + \e^b_i \bAr{D}_b \e^A_i \RIghT).\end{aligned}$$ its eValuation In CartESian cooRDinates Agrees WitH thE resULt GiVen In.

gAusS CoNstRAinT
----------------

The contRiBuTion tO the ACTIOn of The gausS consTraint in the fuLl tHeorY Is gIven bY $$\begiN{aliGnEd}
 \fraC{1}{16\pi G}G(\vEc\lamBdA)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\sigmA \lambda^i\lEft(\PaRtiAl_AE^a_i+\vARepsilOn_{iJk}A^J_aE^a_k\riGht).\end{aLIgnEd}$$ tHE VaRiation of this contrIbUTIoN also reqUires aNOtHeR Boundary TeRm iN ordER To makE the FUlL variatiOnal prOBlEm Well defInEd. It is GiVen By $$\lAbel{eQ:q}
{\cal q}=\frac{1}{8\pI G\beta} \oiNt_{\delTA \Sigma} dS_a (E^a_i-\baR{e}^a_i) \lambda^i,$$ wheRE $\bAR{e}^a_I$ Is thE deNsitized triAd at SPatiAl inFInIty. wIthouT this TeRM, iNSerting the asymptotiC fOrm of tHe triAd, the result is Divergent. SINCE at spatiAl inFInITy the metric is fLat, $\baR{E}^a_i$ is indePEndent of $m$ and $J$. thereforE, any variaTIOnal deriVatIve Of tHis TERm Will be zero
 in Ashtekar variables, th e equivale nt bo und ary  t ermto t akes the follo w ingform: $$\begin{aligned }
{\c al E}=- \f rac{1 }{8 \pi G\ b e ta} \o in t_{ \d e lt a \Si gma } \math rm{d}S_a \ fra c{ N}{\sqrt{E}} \l eft(E^a_i\ba r{D}_b E^b_i  +E^b_i\b ar{ D }_b E ^a_ i \ri ght),\ e nd{ali gned}$$ w he r e, sim i lar tot h ederi vative $\bar{\nab l a} $  defined earli er, $\ ba r {D } $  is  th e covarian tderiv a tive co m pa t i b lew ith the order  zero compo n ent  of th etri a d at i nfini ty . 

I n our reduc ed t heory, th e boun d ary ter m  is giv en by$$\ beg in{a l ig ne d}{\ m ath f ra k e } = - \frac{1} {4  G \beta }\oi n t _ { \del ta\sig ma} \ mathrm{d}s_a\fr ac{N } {\s qrt{e }} \l eft( \e ^a_i\bar{D }_b \ e^ b_i + \e^b_i \b ar{D }_b \e^a_ i \ ri ght ). \end{ a ligned }$$  It s evalu ation i n  Ca rt e s i an  coordinates agree sw i th  the res ult gi v en  i n .

Gauss  c ons trai n t 
---- ---- - -- -----

T he con t ri bu tion to  t he act io n o f t he Ga u ss c onstra int in t he fu l l theory is gi v en by $$\begi n {a l i gn e d}
\fr ac{1}{16\pi  G}G ( \vec \lam b da )&= \ frac{ 1}{8\ pi G\ b eta}\int_\Sigma \la mb da^i\l eft(\ partial_aE^a_ i+\varepsi l o n _{ijk}A^ j_aE ^ a_ k \right).\end{a ligne d}$$ The v a riationof th is contr ibution a l s o requir esano the r b o u nd ary term in o r d er t omake th e f ull var iat ion alpro bl em well d efined.It  i sgi ven  by $ $ \label{e q: Q}{\ cal  Q}=\ f rac{1} {8\pi  G\b et a} \oi nt_{\de l ta \ Sigm a}  d S_a(E^ a_ i-\ba r{E} ^ a_i ) \lamb da^i,$$ w her e  $\b ar {E }^a_i$is the densit iz ed triad a tspa tial i n f inity. W ithout this term, inser t ing the  as ympto ticform of t hetriad,  th e  resul t is d iverg en t.S i nce a t sp ati al  infinityt h e m etric  i s fl at, $\b ar{E}^a_i$ is inde p end ent of $M$ an d $ J$.T h er efo r e, any  v a ria t i onal derivative  of this t er m  w ill be zer o 
 in_Ashtekar variables,_the equivalent boundary term_to takes_the_following form:_$$\begin{aligned}
{\cal_E}= -\frac{1}{8 \pi_G\beta}\oint_{\delta \Sigma} \mathrm{d}S_a_\frac{N}{\sqrt{E}} \left(E^a_i \bar{D}_b E^b_i_+ E^b_i \bar{D}_b_E^a_i_\right),\end{aligned}$$ where, similar to the derivative $\bar{\nabla}$ defined earlier, $\bar{D}$ is the covariant derivative_compatible_with the_order_zero_component of the triad at_infinity.

In our reduced theory, the_boundary term_is given by $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathfrak e}= -\frac{1}{4 G\beta}\oint_{\delta \sigma}_\mathrm{d}s_a_\frac{N}{\sqrt{e}} \left(\e^a_i \bar{D}_b_\e^b_i + \e^b_i \bar{D}_b \e^a_i \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its evaluation in_Cartesian coordinates agrees with the result_given in.

Gauss constraint
----------------

The_contribution_to_the action of the_Gauss constraint in the full theory_is given by $$\begin{aligned}
 \frac{1}{16\pi G}G(\vec\lambda)&=\frac{1}{8\pi_G\beta}\int_\Sigma \lambda^i\left(\partial_aE^a_i+\varepsilon_{ijk}A^j_aE^a_k\right).\end{aligned}$$ The variation of this contribution_also requires another boundary term in_order to make the full_variational problem_well defined. It is given_by $$\label{eq:Q}
{\cal Q}=\frac{1}{8\pi_G\beta} \oint_{\delta_\Sigma} dS_a (E^a_i-\bar{E}^a_i)_\lambda^i,$$ where $\bar{E}^a_i$ is the densitized_triad at spatial_infinity. Without this term, inserting the_asymptotic_form of the_triad,_the_result is_divergent. Since at_spatial_infinity the_metric_is flat, $\bar{E}^a_i$ is independent of_$M$_and $J$. Therefore, any variational derivative of_this term will be_zero