 much higher than the rates achieved in earlier phases (typically with $\dot{M}\sim \mbox{several}\times 10^{-6}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$). In Figure 14 we present an example of a He white dwarf of 0.199[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} which experiences 3 such flashes (the secondary originally had a mass of 1.4[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} and filled its Roche lobe near the end of the main sequence).

Ultracompact X-ray Binaries
---------------------------

As Figures 2a and 13 show, systems with initial orbital periods below the bifurcation period ($\sim 18\,$hr) become ultracompact binaries with minimum orbital periods in the range of 11$\,$–$\,83\,$min. The shortest period is similar to the $11\,$min period in the X-ray binary 4U 1820-30 in the globular cluster NGC 6624 (Stella et al. 1987). Unlike the two better-known models for the formation of this system, this evolutionary channel involves neither a direct collision (Verbunt 1987) nor a common-envelope phase (Bailyn & Grindlay 1987; Rasio, Pfahl, & Rappaport 2000) and therefore constitutes an attractive alternative scenario for 4U 1820-30. This alternative evolutionary path for the origin of 4U1820-30 was originally suggested by Tutukov et al. (1987)[^4]. Fedorova & Ergma (1989) made the first detailed case study of this scenario and showed that, if mass transfer starts near or just after the point of central hydrogen exhaustion, orbital periods as short as 8 min could be attained and that a system like 4U 1820-30 can pass through an orbital of 11 min twice, while approaching the period minimum and after having passed through it. In related studies, Nelson, Rappaport & Joss (1986) and Pylyser & Savonije (1988) found minimum periods as short as 34 and 38 min, respectively. These authors were not specifically trying to explain 4U 1820-30 but their Galactic counterparts 4U 1626-67 and 4U 1915-05 with orbital periods of 41min (Middleditch et al. 1981; Chakrabarty 1998) and 50min (Chou, Grindlay, & Bloser 2001), respectively.

\[fig:
much higher than the rates achieved in early phase (typically with $ \dot{M}\sim \mbox{several}\times 10^{-6}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$). In Figure   14 we present an example of a He ashen dwarf of 0.199[[$\,M_\odot$ ] { } ] { }   which experiences 3 such blink of an eye (the secondary originally have a mass of 1.4[[$\,M_\odot$ ] { } ] { }   and filled its Roche lobe near the conclusion of the main sequence). 

 Ultracompact X - re Binaries 
 --------------------------- 

 As Figures   2a and 13 show, systems with initial orbital periods below the bifurcation time period ($ \sim 18\,$hr) become ultracompact binaries with minimum orbital periods in the stove of 11$\,$–$\,83\,$min. The shortest period is similar to the $ 11\,$min period in the ten - ray binary 4U 1820 - 30 in the globular cluster NGC 6624 (Stella et al.   1987). Unlike the two better - known models for the constitution of this system, this evolutionary channel involves neither a direct collision (Verbunt 1987) nor a common - envelope phase (Bailyn & Grindlay 1987; Rasio, Pfahl, & Rappaport 2000) and therefore constitutes an attractive alternative scenario for 4U 1820 - 30. This alternative evolutionary path for the origin of 4U1820 - 30 was originally suggested by Tutukov et al.   (1987)[^4 ]. Fedorova & Ergma (1989) made the first detailed case study of this scenario and read that, if mass transfer start about or barely after the point of central hydrogen exhaustion, orbital periods as short as 8 min could be fall upon and that a system like 4U 1820 - 30 can pass through an orbital of 11 min twice, while approaching the period minimum and after having pass through it. In related studies, Nelson, Rappaport & Joss (1986) and Pylyser & Savonije (1988) found minimum periods equally short as 34 and 38 minute, respectively. These authors were not specifically trying to explain 4U 1820 - 30 but their Galactic counterparts 4U 1626 - 67 and 4U 1915 - 05 with orbital periods of 41min (Middleditch et al.   1981; Chakrabarty 1998) and 50min (Chou, Grindlay, & Bloser 2001), respectively. 

 \[fig:
 mufh higher than the rates achieved in eatluer pheses (tylically dith $\dot{M}\sim \mbox{several}\timed 10^{-6}{{\nbox}{$\,M_\idot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$). In Figure 14 we prdsent an vxample od a Ie white dwarf oh 0.199[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} wmnch esierieucxs 3 such flashex (the secotdary originalny hcd a mass of 1.4[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} and filled its Rocre lobe nfar the end of the iain sequence).

Ultracompact X-ray Binariea
---------------------------

As Figlres 2a and 13 show, sustems with initial orbitap pegiods below the bivurcation pgdioq ($\sim 18\,$hr) becooe ultracompact binarigs with minimum orbital periods kn thz range of 11$\,$–$\,83\,$nib. Tjg shortest pxriod ps similar to the $11\,$min period in the X-ray blnary 4U 1820-30 in the globular clusver NGC 6624 (Stella et aj. 1987). Unlike dhz two better-known modwlw for the foroqtiun kf tgis sydtej, this evomutionary cyannel involves neiuhew a direct colmision (Vqrbunt 1987) nor a common-envelope phase (Bailjn & Frindlay 1987; Rasio, Pfahl, & Eappaport 2000) and thereflre constytutes an attractive alternative scenario for 4U 1820-30. Dhis elgeruqtive wvllutionary path for the origin of 4U1820-30 was origigzlky suggested by Butukov et al. (1987)[^4]. Fedotoga & Ergma (1989) made jhe first setailed case studj of thys scwnario anq shpwed that, if mass transfer wtarts near je just after the plint of cencral hidrogem exhaustion, orbital pexiods zs short as 8 min couma be attained ana tmat a system like 4U 1820-30 can pass through en oryital of 11 mim twicq, while aporoacmhng the period minlmum cnd axter havinh passed through it. In related studies, Nelson, Rdppdport & Jjss (1986) snd Pylyser & Favonije (1988) founb minimui perkods as shkrt as 34 and 38 min, rqspectively. Tvgse authors wxre not s[ecidicaoly trykvg to explain 4I 1820-30 but thvix Galactix counterparts 4U 1626-67 end 4O 1915-05 with orbital pzxiids of 41min (Middkedktcr vt el. 1981; Chwnrabarty 1998) ang 50miv (Cfpu, Grkndlay, & Blowdr 2001), tespectively.

\[fig:
much higher than the rates achieved in (typically $\dot{M}\sim \mbox{several}\times In Figure 14 a white dwarf of which experiences 3 flashes (the secondary originally had a of 1.4[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} and filled its Roche lobe near the end of the main Ultracompact X-ray Binaries --------------------------- As Figures 2a and 13 show, systems with initial periods the period 18\,$hr) become ultracompact binaries with minimum orbital periods in the range of 11$\,$–$\,83\,$min. The shortest period similar to the $11\,$min period in the X-ray 4U 1820-30 in the cluster NGC 6624 (Stella et 1987). the two models the of this system, evolutionary channel involves neither a direct collision (Verbunt 1987) nor a common-envelope phase (Bailyn & Grindlay 1987; Pfahl, & and therefore an alternative for 4U 1820-30. evolutionary path for the origin of suggested by Tutukov et al. (1987)[^4]. Fedorova & (1989) made first detailed case study of this and showed that, if mass transfer starts near just after the point of central hydrogen exhaustion, orbital periods as short as 8 min attained and that a like 4U 1820-30 pass an of min twice, approaching the period minimum and after having passed through it. In studies, Nelson, Rappaport & Joss (1986) and Pylyser & Savonije minimum as short as and 38 min, respectively. authors not specifically trying to 1820-30 their 1626-67 4U with orbital periods of (Middleditch et al. 1981; Chakrabarty and 50min (Chou, Grindlay,
 much higher than the rates achIeved in earLier pHasEs (tYpIcalLy wiTh $\dot{M}\sim \mbox{sEVeraL}\times 10^{-6}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$). In FigUre 14 we PrESent AN eXamplE of a He wHItE DWarF oF 0.199[[$\,M_\OdoT$]{}]{} wHIcH expeRieNces 3 sucH flashes (thE seCoNdary originaLLy Had a mass of 1.4[[$\,m_\odOt$]{}]{} and filled iTs ROche loBe NeaR The enD of The maIn sequENce).

UltRacompact x-rAY BinarIEs
---------------------------

As FigUREs 2A and 13 Show, systems with inITiAL orbital periodS below ThE BiFURcaTioN period ($\sim 18\,$Hr) BecomE UltracoMPaCT BInaRIes with minimuM orbital perIOds In the rAnGe oF 11$\,$–$\,83\,$Min. The ShortEsT PerIod is similaR to tHe $11\,$min periOd in thE x-ray binARy 4U 1820-30 in thE globuLar CluSter ngC 6624 (stEllA eT Al. 1987). UNLiKe tHE twO better-kNoWn ModelS for THE FOrmaTioN of tHis syStem, this evoluTioNary CHanNel inVolveS neiThEr a diRect coLlisiOn (verbunt 1987) nor a commOn-enVelope phaSe (BAiLyn & grIndlaY 1987; rasio, PFahL, & RaPpaport 2000) And therEForE cONSTiTutes an attractive aLtERNaTive scenArio foR 4u 1820-30. THiS AlternatIvE evOlutIONary pAth fOR tHe origin Of 4U1820-30 was ORiGiNally suGgEsted bY TUtuKov Et al. (1987)[^4]. FEDoroVa & ErgmA (1989) made the First DEtailed case stuDY of this scenarIO aND ShOWed tHat, If mass transFer sTArts Near OR jUst AFter tHe poiNt OF cENtral hydrogen exhausTiOn, orbiTal peRiods as short aS 8 min could bE ATTained anD thaT A sYStem like 4U 1820-30 can paSs thrOugh an orbiTAl of 11 min tWice, wHile apprOaching thE PEriod minImuM anD afTer HAViNg passed throuGH It. In ReLated stUdiEs, NelsoN, RaPpaPorT & JoSs (1986) And PylyseR & SavonijE (1988) fOuNd MiNimUm perIOds as shoRt As 34 aNd 38 Min, RespeCTively. these AuthOrS wERe nOt speciFIcALLy trYiNg To exPlaIn 4u 1820-30 but tHeir gAlaCtic couNterparts 4u 1626-67 anD 4u 1915-05 witH oRbItal perIods of 41min (MiddLeDitch et al. 1981; CHaKraBarty 1998) aND 50Min (Chou, GRindlay, & Bloser 2001), respectiveLY.

\[fig:
 much higher than the rate s achieved  in e arl ier  p hase s (t ypically with$ \dot {M}\sim \mbox{several} \time s1 0^{- 6 }{ {\mbo x}{$\,M _ \o d o t\, $y r$ ^{- 1} $ }} $). I n F igure 1 4 we prese ntan  example ofa  H e white dw arf  of 0.199[[$ \,M _\odot $] {}] { } whi chexper iences 3 such  flashes(t h e seco n dary or i g in ally  had a mass of 1. 4 [[ $ \,M_\odot$]{}] {} and  f i ll e d  it s R oche lobene ar th e  end of th e m ain sequence).

U ltracompact X-r ay Bin ar ies ------ ----- -- - --- ----------
AsFigures 2 a and1 3 show, systems  withini tia l or b it al  pe ri o dsb el owt hebifurcat io nperio d ($ \ s i m  18\ ,$h r) b ecome  ultracompact  bi nari e s w ith m inimu m or bi tal p eriods  in t he  range of 11$\, $–$\ ,83\,$min . T he  sh or testp eriodissim ilar to  the $1 1 \,$ mi n p er iod in the X-ray b in a r y4U 1820- 30 int he  g l obular c lu ste r NG C 6624(Ste l la  et al.1987). Un li ke thetw o bett er -kn own  mode l s fo r theformatio n oft his system, th i s evolutionar y  c h a nn e l in vol ves neither  a d i rect  col l is ion (Verb unt 1 98 7 )n or a common-envelop ephase(Bail yn & Grindlay  1987; Ras i o ,  Pfahl,& Ra p pa p ort 2000) andthere fore const i tutes an  attr active a lternativ e scenario  fo r 4 U 1 820 - 3 0.  This alterna t i ve e vo lutiona rypath fo r t heori gin  o f 4U1820- 30 was o ri gi na ll y s ugges t ed by Tu tu kov  e t a l. (1 9 87)[^4 ]. Fe doro va  & Erg ma (198 9 )m a de t he  f irst  de ta iledcase stu dy of t his scena rio andsh ow ed that , if mass tra ns fer starts  n ear  or ju s t  after t he point of central hyd r ogen ex hau stion , or bital per iod s as s hor t  as 8min co uld b eatt a i ned a n d  t hat  a  system li k e  4U  1820 -3 0 ca n passthrough an orbital of11 min twice,  wh ilea p pr oac h in g  th ep eri o d  minimum and af ter having  p a ss ed through it.  I n relat ed stud ies,N elson,Rappaport  & Joss ( 19 86)a n d P ylyser & S avonije(1988) fo u nd mi n im um pe rio ds assh ort  as 3 4 and3 8 m in, r espect iv ely. T heseau thors we re not specifically try ing to  expl ain  4U 1820- 30b uttheir Gal acti c counterp art s 4 U 162 6-6 7  and4U 1 9 15 -05 withorbi t al period s  o f 4 1 m in  (Middledit c h etal. 1 981 ;  Chakr abar ty 1998) and 50mi n  (Chou, Grindl ay,& Blo ser 2001 ),  respectively. 

\ [f i g :
 much_higher than_the rates achieved in_earlier phases_(typically_with $\dot{M}\sim_\mbox{several}\times_10^{-6}{{\mbox}{$\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}$). In Figure 14_we present an_example of a He_white dwarf of_0.199[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} which_experiences 3 such flashes (the secondary originally had a mass of 1.4[[$\,M_\odot$]{}]{} and filled its_Roche_lobe near_the_end_of the main sequence).

Ultracompact X-ray_Binaries
---------------------------

As Figures 2a and 13 show,_systems with_initial orbital periods below the bifurcation period ($\sim_18\,$hr)_become ultracompact binaries_with minimum orbital periods in the range of 11$\,$–$\,83\,$min._The shortest period is similar to_the $11\,$min period_in_the_X-ray binary 4U 1820-30_in the globular cluster NGC 6624_(Stella et al. 1987). Unlike the two_better-known models for the formation of this_system, this evolutionary channel involves neither_a direct collision (Verbunt 1987)_nor a_common-envelope phase (Bailyn & Grindlay_1987; Rasio, Pfahl,_& Rappaport_2000) and therefore_constitutes an attractive alternative scenario for_4U 1820-30. This_alternative evolutionary path for the origin_of_4U1820-30 was originally_suggested_by_Tutukov et_al. (1987)[^4]. Fedorova &_Ergma_(1989) made_the_first detailed case study of this_scenario_and showed that, if mass transfer starts_near or just after_the_point of central hydrogen_exhaustion, orbital periods as short_as 8 min could be attained_and that_a system_like 4U 1820-30 can pass through an orbital of 11 min_twice, while approaching the period minimum_and after having passed_through it._In_related studies, Nelson,_Rappaport_& Joss_(1986) and Pylyser & Savonije (1988) found_minimum periods_as short as 34 and 38_min, respectively. These authors_were_not specifically trying to explain 4U_1820-30 but their Galactic counterparts 4U_1626-67 and 4U 1915-05 with_orbital_periods_of 41min (Middleditch et al. 1981;_Chakrabarty 1998) and 50min (Chou, Grindlay,_& Bloser 2001),_respectively.

\[fig: