 different boundary conditions. In our model the field content is such that cancellation of vacuum contributions is being enforced, after having included all topologically inequivalent allowed field configurations. This situation is similar to finite temperature calculations. The question if supersymmetry is broken or not requires to check the zero modes of the vacuum state [@witten]. It is easy to see why in conventional finite temperature field theories and their conceptional analogues ${S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$ topological field theories supersymmetry is broken. The vacuum state, in the Wess–Zumino in ${S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$, does contain one bosonic zero mode. In our case this does not occur because we have equal vacuum zero modes (twisted spinors, do not have a zero mode). Consequently, in our model, we expect that supersymmetry will not be spontaneously broken [@love] (for a detailed discussion we recommend the paper of Fujikawa [@fuji]).

Small $L$ Expansion of the effective potential
----------------------------------------------

The leading order contribution to the one loop effective potential for small $L$ values is given by [@dolan; @elizalde; @kirsten]: $$\begin{aligned}
&V=m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}m_{1}v^{3}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}v^{4}}{4} \label{pot}\\
&{-\frac{3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\pi ^{4}}-\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})}{256\pi ^{4}}}\notag\\
&{+\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4}+2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})%
}{128\pi ^{2}}}\notag \\
&{+\frac{(\gamma -\ln [4\pi ])(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{%
1024\pi ^{4}}+\frac{(\gamma +\ln [\frac{2}{\pi }%
])(
different boundary conditions. In our model the field contentedness is such that cancellation of void contributions is being enforced, after having include all topologically inequivalent permit field configurations. This position is like to finite temperature calculations.   The question if supersymmetry is broken or not requires to discipline the zero modes of the vacuum country [ @witten ].   It is comfortable to see why in conventional finite temperature sphere theories and their conceptional analogues $ { S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$ topological battlefield theories supersymmetry is broken.   The vacuum department of state, in the Wess – Zumino in $ { S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$, does contain one bosonic zero mode. In our case this does not happen because we have adequate vacuum zero modes (twisted spinors, do not have a zero modality).   Consequently, in our model, we expect that supersymmetry will not be spontaneously broken [ @love ] (for a detailed discussion we recommend the newspaper of Fujikawa [ @fuji ]). 

 Small $ L$ Expansion of the effective potential 
 ---------------------------------------------- 

 The leading order contribution to the one loop effective potential for small $ L$ values is given by [ @dolan; @elizalde; @kirsten ]: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 & V = m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}m_{1}v^{3}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}v^{4}}{4 } \label{pot}\\ 
 & { -\frac{3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\pi ^{4}}-\frac{% 
 3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})}{256\pi ^{4}}}\notag\\ 
 & { + \frac{% 
 3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4}+2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})% 
 } { 128\pi ^{2}}}\notag \\ 
 & { + \frac{(\gamma -\ln [ 4\pi ]) (2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{% 
 1024\pi ^{4}}+\frac{(\gamma + \ln [ \frac{2}{\pi }% 
 ]) (
 divferent boundary conditiuns. In our model the fmeld cohtent is such that cancellation of vecuun conugibutions is being enworced, afner havint inrluded all topologically inequjyalenc ellowed field cpnfiguratimns. This situadiun is similar to finite temperature cwlculatoojs. The question if xtperajmnetry is broken or not requirss to cieck the zero mpdes of the vacuum state [@wlttej]. It is easy to see why in concentyinal finite gemperaturt yield theorjes and their conceptional analugues ${S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$ jolopmgical fielv theogies supersymmetry is broken. Yhe vacuum stabe, in thw Wess–Zumino in ${S}^{1}{\timev R}^{3}$, does contain oge bosoniw vero mode. In our case tyis dmes tot uxcuf btcanse we hage xqual vacuuj zero modew (twisted spinors, dp git have a zerk mode). Sogsequently, in our model, we expect that vupsrsymmetry will not be wpontaneously broken [@pove] (for w detailed discussion we recommend the paper of Fgjikaxa [@full]).

Foqlp $L$ Expansion of the effective potential
----------------------------------------------

The lqzdonn order contribubion to the one lopp egsective potenjial fox sjall $L$ values is glven by [@dolab; @elizaldt; @kirxten]: $$\begin{aligned}
&V=m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}m_{1}v^{3}+\frac{t_{1}^{2}v^{4}}{4} \label{pot}\\
&{-\fgac{3(2m_{d_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\pi ^{4}}-\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})}{256\'i ^{4}}}\notag\\
&{+\frac{%
3(2o_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-k_{b_{2}}^{4}+2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{y_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})%
}{128\pi ^{2}}}\notag \\
&{+\frac{(\gamma -\lu [4\pi ])(2m_{r_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{%
1024\pi ^{4}}+\fraf{(\gamma +\ln [\wrac{2}{\pi }%
])(
different boundary conditions. In our model the is that cancellation vacuum contributions is all inequivalent allowed field This situation is to finite temperature calculations. The question supersymmetry is broken or not requires to check the zero modes of the state [@witten]. It is easy to see why in conventional finite temperature field and conceptional ${S}^{1}{\times topological field theories supersymmetry is broken. The vacuum state, in the Wess–Zumino in ${S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$, does one bosonic zero mode. In our case this not occur because we equal vacuum zero modes (twisted do have a mode). in model, we expect supersymmetry will not be spontaneously broken [@love] (for a detailed discussion we recommend the paper of Fujikawa Small $L$ the effective ---------------------------------------------- leading contribution to the effective potential for small $L$ values [@dolan; @elizalde; @kirsten]: $$\begin{aligned} &V=m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}m_{1}v^{3}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}v^{4}}{4} \label{pot}\\ &{-\frac{3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\pi ^{4}}-\frac{% ^{4}}}\notag\\ &{+\frac{% }{128\pi ^{2}}}\notag \\ &{+\frac{(\gamma -\ln [4\pi 1024\pi ^{4}}+\frac{(\gamma +\ln [\frac{2}{\pi }% ])(
 different boundary conditioNs. In our modEl the FieLd cOnTent Is suCh that cancellaTIon oF vacuum contributions is Being EnFOrceD, AfTer haVing incLUdED All ToPoLogIcALlY ineqUivAlent alLowed field ConFiGurations. ThiS SiTuation is sImiLar to finite tEmpEraturE cAlcULatioNs. THe queStion iF SupersYmmetry is BrOKen or nOT requirES To ChecK the zero modes of thE VaCUum state [@witten]. it is eaSy TO sEE Why In cOnventionaL fInite TEmperatURe FIELd tHEories and theiR conceptionAL anAlogueS ${S}^{1}{\TimES R}^{3}$ topoLogicAl FIelD theories suPersYmmetry is Broken. tHe vacuuM State, in The WesS–ZuMinO in ${S}^{1}{\TImEs r}^{3}$, doEs COntAIn One BOsoNic zero mOdE. IN our cAse tHIS DOes nOt oCcur BecauSe we have equal VacUum zERo mOdes (tWisteD spiNoRs, do nOt have A zero MoDe). Consequently, iN our Model, we exPecT tHat SuPersyMMetry wIll Not Be spontAneouslY BroKeN [@LOVe] (For a detailed discusSiON We RecommenD the paPEr Of fUjikawa [@fUjI]).

SmAll $L$ eXPansiOn of THe EffectivE potenTIaL
----------------------------------------------

THe leadiNg Order cOnTriButIon to THe onE loop eFfective PotenTIal for small $L$ vaLUes is given by [@dOLaN; @ELiZAlde; @KirSten]: $$\begin{alIgneD}
&v=m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}M_{1}v^{3}+\frAC{g_{1}^{2}V^{4}}{4} \laBEl{pot}\\
&{-\Frac{3(2m_{F_{1}}^{4}-m_{B_{1}}^{4}-M_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\PI ^{4}}-\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})}{256\pi ^{4}}}\notag\\
&{+\fRaC{%
3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{B_{2}}^{4}+2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-M_{t_{2}}^{4})%
}{128\pi ^{2}}}\notag \\
&{+\frac{(\Gamma -\ln [4\pi ])(2m_{F_{1}}^{4}-M_{B_{1}}^{4}-M_{b_{2}}^{4})}{%
1024\pi ^{4}}+\frac{(\GammA +\Ln [\FRac{2}{\pi }%
])(
 different boundary condit ions. In o ur mo del  th efiel d co ntent is sucht hatcancellation of vacuum  cont ri b utio n sis be ing enf o rc e d , a ft er  ha vi n ginclu ded  all to pologicall y i ne quivalent al l ow ed field c onf igurations.Thi s situ at ion is si mil ar to  finit e  tempe rature ca lc u lation s . The q u e st ionif supersymmetryi sb roken or not r equire st oc h eck  th e zero mod es  of t h e vacuu m  s t a t e [ @ witten]. It i s easy to s e e w hy inco nve n tional  fini te tem perature fi eldtheoriesand th e ir conc e ptional  analo gue s $ {S}^ { 1} {\ tim es R}^ { 3} $ t o pol ogical f ie ld  theo ries s u p ersy mme tryis br oken. The vac uum  sta t e,in th e Wes s–Zu mi no in  ${S}^ {1}{\ ti mes R}^{3}$, do es c ontain on e b os oni czerom ode. I n o urcase th is does not  o c c u rbecause we have eq ua l va cuum zer o mode s  ( tw i sted spi no rs,  don o t hav e az er o mode).  Conse q ue nt ly, inou r mode l,  we  ex pectt hatsupers ymmetrywilln ot be spontane o usly broken [ @ lo v e ]( fora d etailed dis cuss i on w e re c om men d  thepaper  o f  F u jikawa [@fuji]).

S ma ll $L$  Expa nsion of theeffectivep o t ential
- ---- - -- - -------------- ----- ---------- - -------
Theleadingorder con t r ibutiontothe  on e l o o peffective pot e n tial  f or smal l $ L$ valu esisgiv enby  [@dolan;  @elizal de ;@k ir ste n]: $ $ \begin{a li gne d} 
&V =m_{1 } ^{2}v^ {2}+g _{1} ^{ 2} m _{1 }v^{3}+ \ fr a c {g_{ 1} ^{ 2}v^ {4} }{ 4} \l abel { pot }\\
&{- \frac{3(2 m_{ f _{1} }^ {4 }-m_{b_ {1}}^{4}-m_{b _{ 2}}^{4})}{ 40 96\ pi ^{4 } } -\frac{% 
3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_ { 1}}^{4} -m_ {t_{2 }}^{ 4})}{256\ pi^{4}}} \no t ag\\
& {+\fra c{%
3 (2 m_{ f _ {1}}^ { 4 }- m_{ b_ {1}}^{4}-m _ { b_{ 2}}^{ 4} +2m_ {f_{2}} ^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4} - m_{ t_{2}}^{4})%}{1 28\p i ^{ 2}} } \n o tag  \ \ 
&{ + \ frac{(\gamma -\ ln [4\pi ] )( 2 m_ {f_{1}}^{4 } -m_ {b _{1}}^{ 4}-m_{b _{2}} ^ {4})}{% 
1024\pi^{4}}+\fr ac {(\g a m ma+\ln [\fra c{2}{\pi  }%
])(
 different_boundary conditions._In our model the_field content_is_such that_cancellation_of vacuum contributions_is being enforced,_after having included all_topologically inequivalent allowed_field_configurations. This situation is similar to finite temperature calculations. The question if supersymmetry is broken_or_not requires_to_check_the zero modes of the_vacuum state [@witten]. It is easy_to see_why in conventional finite temperature field theories and_their_conceptional analogues ${S}^{1}{\times_R}^{3}$ topological field theories supersymmetry is broken. The vacuum state,_in the Wess–Zumino in ${S}^{1}{\times R}^{3}$,_does contain one_bosonic_zero_mode. In our case_this does not occur because we_have equal vacuum zero modes (twisted_spinors, do not have a zero mode). Consequently,_in our model, we expect that_supersymmetry will not be spontaneously_broken [@love]_(for a detailed discussion we_recommend the paper_of Fujikawa_[@fuji]).

Small $L$ Expansion_of the effective potential
----------------------------------------------

The leading order_contribution to the_one loop effective potential for small_$L$_values is given_by_[@dolan;_@elizalde; @kirsten]:_$$\begin{aligned}
&V=m_{1}^{2}v^{2}+g_{1}^{2}m_{1}v^{3}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}v^{4}}{4} \label{pot}\\
&{-\frac{3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{4096\pi ^{4}}-\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})}{256\pi_^{4}}}\notag\\
&{+\frac{%
3(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4}+2m_{f_{2}}^{4}-m_{t_{1}}^{4}-m_{t_{2}}^{4})%
}{128\pi_^{2}}}\notag \\
&{+\frac{(\gamma_-\ln_[4\pi ])(2m_{f_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{1}}^{4}-m_{b_{2}}^{4})}{%
1024\pi ^{4}}+\frac{(\gamma +\ln [\frac{2}{\pi }%
])(