_n \rangle_0
        \simeq  
        \sum_n 
        \langle \ha_n^\dagger  \rangle_0
        \langle \ha_n \rangle_0 \propto |\beta|^2/\kappa.
    \end{aligned}$$ As we consider throughout the large-drive limit, we only keep the leading-order-in-$\beta$ contribution to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$. This is simply the photon number associated with the drive-induced displacement of each cavity annihilation operator. The additional contribution to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$ due to amplification of vacuum fluctuations is $\beta$-independent, hence plays no role in the large-drive limit we consider (see Appendix \[app:n\_bar\]).

![image](Measurement_Protocol_5.pdf){width="100.00000%"}

Exponential SNR and QFI enhancement {#sec:ExpEnhancement}
===================================

We now focus on computing the optimal SNR of the measurement operator $\hM_\tau(N)$ for our $N$ site chain in the $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$ limit; via Eq. (\[eq:QFI\]), this directly yields the QFI. In this limit, a SNR $\sim 1$ will only be achieved for $\tau$ much longer than any internal dynamical timescale. We thus consider the long-$\tau$ limit, effectively ignoring any transient behaviour and assuming the system is in its steady state. Note that our system is dynamically stable as long as $w > \Delta$ and $\kappa>0$, ensuring that a steady state exists.

From Eqs. (\[eq:SignalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\_Op\]) and (\[eq:In\_Out\]), the first order in $\epsilon$ in this limit reads $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:Signal_First_Order}
        \mathcal{S}_\tau(N,\epsilon)
        &
        = 
        \sqrt{2\kappa \tau} 
        \big\lvert
        \Re
        [
        e^{-i \phi}
        \delta  \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss}
        ]
        \big\rvert
    \end{aligned}$$ where $$\delta \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss} \equiv    
            \epsilon \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}
            \left( 
            \frac
_ n \rangle_0 
         \simeq  
         \sum_n 
         \langle \ha_n^\dagger   \rangle_0 
         \langle \ha_n \rangle_0 \propto |\beta|^2/\kappa. 
     \end{aligned}$$ As we consider throughout the large - drive limit, we merely restrain the leading - decree - in-$\beta$ contribution to $ \bar{n}_{\rm tot}$. This is just the photon number associated with the driveway - induce displacement of each pit annihilation hustler. The additional contribution to $ \bar{n}_{\rm tot}$ due to amplification of void fluctuations is $ \beta$-independent, hence play no role in the large - drive terminus ad quem we consider (see Appendix \[app: n\_bar\ ]). 

! [ image](Measurement_Protocol_5.pdf){width="100.00000% " } 

 Exponential SNR and QFI enhancement { # sec: ExpEnhancement } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We immediately focus on computing the optimum SNR of the measurement operator $ \hM_\tau(N)$ for our $ N$ web site chain in the $ \epsilon \rightarrow 0 $ limit; via Eq.   (\[eq: QFI\ ]), this directly yields the QFI. In this limit, a SNR $ \sim 1 $ will only be achieve for $ \tau$ much longer than any internal dynamical timescale. We thus consider the long-$\tau$ limit, efficaciously ignore any transient behaviour and assuming the system is in its steady state. Note that our system is dynamically stable equally long as $ tungsten > \Delta$ and $ \kappa>0 $, ensuring that a regular state exists. 

 From Eqs.   (\[eq: SignalDef\]),(\[eq: Meas\_Op\ ]) and (\[eq: In\_Out\ ]), the first order in $ \epsilon$ in this limit learn $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: Signal_First_Order } 
         \mathcal{S}_\tau(N,\epsilon) 
         & 
         = 
         \sqrt{2\kappa \tau } 
         \big\lvert 
         \Re 
         [ 
         e^{-i \phi } 
         \delta   \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss } 
         ] 
         \big\rvert 
     \end{aligned}$$ where $ $ \delta \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss } \equiv    
             \epsilon \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0 } 
             \left (
             \frac
_n \rwngle_0
        \simeq  
        \sum_n 
        \langlx \ha_n^\dafger  \ravgle_0
        \langle \ha_n \ranglx_0 \pripto |\veta|^2/\kappa.
    \end{alignea}$$ As we clnsider rhronghout the large-vdive limit, we lnly jeep the leadikg-order-in-$\beda$ contributiot go $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$. This is simply the photjn numbrr associated wijh tht dwive-jnduced displacement of each cavitg annihplation operator. Yhe additional contributioj to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$ due to amplificatuon jd vacuum fluztuations pv $\beta$-indekendent, hence plays no role in tfe laxge-drive linir wf consider (sxe Appvndix \[app:n\_bar\]).

![lkage](Medsurememt_Protocol_5.pdf){wldth="100.00000%"}

Eeponwntial SNR and QFI eniancement {#sec:ExpEnhagcement}
===================================

We nkw focus on compuribg thg opthmal WNR of tie jeasurfmeit operator $\hM_\tau(N)$ for our $N$ site chain im eye $\epsilon \rifhtarrjw 0$ limit; via Eq. (\[eq:QFI\]), this directly yieldv tge QFI. In this limit, a WNR $\sim 1$ will only be achieved for $\tau$ much longer than any internal dynamical dimesraue. Cc gyud consider the long-$\tau$ limit, effectively ignowjnb sny transient nehaviour and assukijg jhe system is kn its stsady state. Note thwt our fysten is dynaiicakly stable as long as $w > \Deota$ and $\kappc>0$, ebsuring that a stecdy state exnsts.

Frpm Eqx. (\[eq:SignalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\_Op\]) anb (\[eq:In\_Kut\]), the firdt order jv $\epsilon$ in thir lpmit reads $$\btein{aligned}
\label{eq:Fignal_Firwt_Orber}
        \msthcal{F}_\tau(N,\epsilln)
        &
        = 
        \sqtt{2\kappd \tau} 
        \big\lvert
        \Re
        [
        e^{-i \phi}
        \delta  \langke \ha_1 \rangle^{\ri ss}
        ]
        \bng\rverg
    \end{alpgned}$$ whece $$\delta \landle \ha_1 \rangle^{\sl ss} \equiv    
            \epwilon \lko_{\epsilon \rightsrrow 0}
            \lwft( 
            \frec
_n \rangle_0 \simeq \sum_n \langle \ha_n^\dagger \rangle_0 \rangle_0 |\beta|^2/\kappa. \end{aligned}$$ we consider throughout keep leading-order-in-$\beta$ contribution to tot}$. This is the photon number associated with the displacement of each cavity annihilation operator. The additional contribution to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$ due amplification of vacuum fluctuations is $\beta$-independent, hence plays no role in the large-drive we (see \[app:n\_bar\]). Exponential SNR and QFI enhancement {#sec:ExpEnhancement} =================================== We now focus on computing the optimal SNR of measurement operator $\hM_\tau(N)$ for our $N$ site chain the $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$ via Eq. (\[eq:QFI\]), this directly the In this a $\sim will only be for $\tau$ much longer than any internal dynamical timescale. We thus consider the long-$\tau$ limit, effectively ignoring transient behaviour the system in steady Note that our dynamically stable as long as $w $\kappa>0$, ensuring that a steady state exists. From (\[eq:SignalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\_Op\]) and the first order in $\epsilon$ in limit reads $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:Signal_First_Order} \mathcal{S}_\tau(N,\epsilon) & = \sqrt{2\kappa \big\lvert \Re [ e^{-i \phi} \delta \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss} ] \big\rvert \end{aligned}$$ where $$\delta \rangle^{\rm ss} \equiv \epsilon \rightarrow 0} \left(
_n \rangle_0
        \simeq  
        \sum_n 
        \langle \ha_n^\Dagger  \rangLe_0
        \lanGle \Ha_n \RaNgle_0 \PropTo |\beta|^2/\kappa.
    \end{ALignEd}$$ As we consider throughoUt the LaRGe-drIVe Limit, We only kEEp THE leAdInG-orDeR-In-$\Beta$ cOntRibutioN to $\bar{n}_{\rm tOt}$. THiS is simply the PHoTon number aSsoCiated with thE drIve-indUcEd dISplacEmeNt of eAch cavITy anniHilation oPeRAtor. ThE AdditioNAL cOntrIbution to $\bar{n}_{\rm toT}$ DuE To amplificatioN of vacUuM FlUCTuaTioNs is $\beta$-inDePendeNT, hence pLAyS NO RolE In the large-driVe limit we coNSidEr (see APpEndIX \[app:n\_bAr\]).

![imaGe](mEasUrement_ProtOcol_5.Pdf){width="100.00000%"}

EXponenTIal SNR aND QFI enhAncemeNt {#sEc:EXpEnHAnCeMenT}
===================================

WE Now FOcUs oN ComPuting thE oPtImal SnR of THE MEasuRemEnt oPeratOr $\hM_\tau(N)$ for ouR $N$ sIte cHAin In the $\EpsilOn \riGhTarroW 0$ limit; Via Eq. (\[Eq:qFI\]), this directly YielDs the QFI. IN thIs LimIt, A SNR $\sIM 1$ will oNly Be aChieved For $\tau$ mUCh lOnGER ThAn any internal dynamIcAL TiMescale. WE thus cONsIdER the long-$\TaU$ liMit, eFFEctivEly iGNoRing any tRansieNT bEhAviour aNd AssumiNg The SysTem is IN its Steady State. NotE that OUr system is dynaMIcally stable aS LoNG As $W > \deltA$ anD $\kappa>0$, ensurIng tHAt a sTeadY StAte EXists.

from EQs. (\[EQ:SIGnalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\_Op\]) and (\[eQ:IN\_Out\]), thE firsT order in $\epsilOn$ in this liMIT Reads $$\begIn{alIGnED}
\label{eq:Signal_first_order}
        \mathcAL{S}_\tau(N,\epSilon)
        &
        = 
        \Sqrt{2\kappA \tau} 
        \big\lvERT
        \Re
        [
        e^{-i \phi}
        \DelTa  \lAngLe \hA_1 \RAnGle^{\rm ss}
        ]
        \big\rveRT
    \End{aLiGned}$$ wheRe $$\dElta \lanGle \Ha_1 \rAngLe^{\rM sS} \equiv    
            \epsIlon \lim_{\ePsIlOn \RiGhtArrow 0}
            \LEft( 
            \frac
_n \rangle_0
        \sime q  
       \su m_n  
     \la ngle \ha_n^\da g ger \rangle_0
        \la ngle\h a _n \ r an gle_0  \propt o  | \ b eta |^ 2/ \ka pp a .    \ end {aligne d}$$ As we  co ns ider through o ut  the large -dr ive limit, w e o nly ke ep  th e  lead ing -orde r-in-$ \ beta$contribut io n  to $\ b ar{n}_{ \ r mtot} $. This is simply th e  photon number  assoc ia t ed w ith  th e drive-in du ced d i splacem e nt o f  ea c h cavity anni hilation op e rat or. Th eadd i tional  cont ri b uti on to $\bar {n}_ {\rm tot} $ duet o ampli f ication  of va cuu m f luct u at io nsis $\b e ta $-i n dep endent,he nc e pla ys n o r o le i n t he l arge- drive limit w e c onsi d er(seeAppen dix\[ app:n \_bar\ ]).
![ image](Measurem ent_ Protocol_ 5.p df ){w id th="1 0 0.0000 0%" }
Exponen tial SN R  an dQ F I  e nhancement {#sec:E xp E n ha ncement} 
===== = == == = ======== == === ==== = = ===== 

We no w focuson com p ut in g the o pt imal S NR  of  th e mea s urem ent op erator $ \hM_\ t au(N)$ for our $N$ site chai n  i n th e  $\e psi lon \righta rrow 0$ l imit ;  v iaE q. (\ [eq:Q FI \ ]) ,  this directly yiel ds  the Q FI. I n this limit,  a SNR $\s i m 1$ willonly be achieved for $ \tau$  much long e r than a ny in ternal d ynamicalt i mescale.  We  th uscon s i de r the long-$\ t a u$ l im it, eff ect ively i gno rin g a nytr ansient b ehaviour  a nd  a ss umi ng th e  systemis  in  i tsstead y  state . Not e th at  o u r s ystem i s  d y n amic al ly  sta ble  a s lon g as $w> \Delt a$ and $\ kap p a>0$ ,en suringthat a steady  s tate exist s. 

F rom Eq s .  (\[eq:S ignalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\ _ Op\]) a nd(\[eq :In\ _Out\]),the  first  or d er in$\epsi lon$in  th i s  limi t re ads  $ $\begin{al i g ned }
\la be l{eq :Signal _First_Order}
     \mathcal{S}_\ tau (N,\ e p si lon ) 
   &
     = 
       \sqrt{2\k ap p a\tau} 
     \ big\lve rt
       \ R e
       [
       e^{-i  \ phi}       \delta   \langl e \ha_1 \ r angle ^ {\ rm ss }
      ] 
      \big\ r ver t
   \end{ al igned} $$ wh er e $$\del ta \langle \ha_1 \rangl e^{\rm  ss}\eq uiv    
        \epsi lon\lim_{\eps ilo n \ right arr o w 0}       \lef t(          \ fra c 
_n \rangle_0
_ _   _ \simeq__
 __  _  \sum_n_
   _  __\langle \ha_n^\dagger  \rangle_0
        \langle \ha_n \rangle_0_\propto_|\beta|^2/\kappa.
 ___\end{aligned}$$ As we consider throughout_the large-drive limit, we only_keep the_leading-order-in-$\beta$ contribution to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$. This is simply_the_photon number associated_with the drive-induced displacement of each cavity annihilation operator._The additional contribution to $\bar{n}_{\rm tot}$_due to amplification_of_vacuum_fluctuations is $\beta$-independent, hence_plays no role in the large-drive_limit we consider (see Appendix \[app:n\_bar\]).

![image](Measurement_Protocol_5.pdf){width="100.00000%"}

Exponential_SNR and QFI enhancement {#sec:ExpEnhancement}
===================================

We now focus_on computing the optimal SNR of_the measurement operator $\hM_\tau(N)$ for_our $N$_site chain in the $\epsilon_\rightarrow 0$ limit;_via Eq. (\[eq:QFI\]),_this directly yields_the QFI. In this limit, a_SNR $\sim 1$_will only be achieved for $\tau$_much_longer than any_internal_dynamical_timescale. We_thus consider the_long-$\tau$_limit, effectively_ignoring_any transient behaviour and assuming the_system_is in its steady state. Note that_our system is dynamically_stable_as long as $w_> \Delta$ and $\kappa>0$, ensuring_that a steady state exists.

From Eqs. (\[eq:SignalDef\]),(\[eq:Meas\_Op\])_and (\[eq:In\_Out\]),_the first_order in $\epsilon$ in this limit reads $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:Signal_First_Order}
   _    \mathcal{S}_\tau(N,\epsilon)
 _   _ _&
_  __ _ = 
    _ _ \sqrt{2\kappa \tau} 
  _   __\big\lvert
     _  \Re
   _    [
___    _e^{-i \phi}
    _  _\delta  \langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss}
 __     ]
__     _\big\rvert
__  \end{aligned}$$ where $$\delta_\langle \ha_1 \rangle^{\rm ss} \equiv _  
      _  _  \epsilon \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow_0}
__         _\left( 
_  _        \frac