90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (105,30)(115,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (115,-40)(105,-30)

1.5cm

(155,120)(-5.0,-20) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,50)\[c\][$k_1$]{} (20,40)(30,30) (0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (20,-40)(30,-30) (45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (60,30)(70,40) (45,0)(90,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,-50)\[c\][$p_2$]{} (60,-30)(70,-40)

Due to the noncommutative nature of the coordinates, the theory is not Lorentz invariant and the results are frame dependent. In writing down the amplitudes corresponding to each of the above diagrams, we assume that $\theta \ll 1$ and make the substitution $\sin(a\theta) \longrightarrow a\theta$, where $a$ is used to generically denote the quantity appearing in the argument of the sine function multiplied to $\theta$.\
Choosing to work in the center of mass frame, we find that the s-channel diagram vanishes. The square of the matrix amplitude reads $$|{\mathcal{M}}_{NC}|^2 = \left(\frac{e\theta}{16}\right)^4~[100s^4 + 96t^4 +
204st^3 + 360s^2t^2 + 250s^3t]$$ and the total (unpolarised) cross section is $$\sigma_{NC} = (1.5 \times 10^{-3}) \alpha_{em}^2s^3\theta^4$$ which for $\sqrt{s}\sim$ TeV and $\theta \leq (10^4~GeV)^{-2}$ as in [@sh2] gives $\sigma_{NC}\sim 10^{-10}$ fb, to be compared with the SM contribution, $\sigma_{SM}\sim$ fb at the same center of mass
90,0)[3]{}[5 ] { } (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6 ] { } (120,50)\[c\][$p_1 $ ] { } (105,30)(115,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6 ] { } (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2 $ ] { } (115,-40)(105,-30) 

 1.5 cm 

 (155,120)(-5.0,-20) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6 ] { } (15,50)\[c\][$k_1 $ ] { } (20,40)(30,30) (0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6 ] { } (15,-50)\[c\][$k_2 $ ] { } (20,-40)(30,-30) (45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6 ] { } (75,50)\[c\][$p_1 $ ] { } (60,30)(70,40) (45,0)(90,-45)[3]{}[6 ] { } (75,-50)\[c\][$p_2 $ ] { } (60,-30)(70,-40) 

 Due to the noncommutative nature of the coordinates, the theory is not Lorentz invariant and the result are frame of reference dependent. In writing down the amplitudes equate to each of the above diagrams, we assume that $ \theta \ll 1 $ and induce the substitution $ \sin(a\theta) \longrightarrow a\theta$, where $ a$ is used to generically denote the quantity appearing in the argument of the sine routine multiplied to $ \theta$.\ 
 Choosing to make in the center of mass frame, we find that the s - channel diagram vanishes. The square of the matrix amplitude reads $ $ |{\mathcal{M}}_{NC}|^2 = \left(\frac{e\theta}{16}\right)^4~[100s^4 + 96t^4 + 
 204st^3 + 360s^2t^2 + 250s^3t]$$ and the entire (unpolarised) cross section is $ $ \sigma_{NC } = (1.5 \times 10^{-3 }) \alpha_{em}^2s^3\theta^4$$ which for $ \sqrt{s}\sim$ TeV and $ \theta \leq (10 ^ 4 ~ GeV)^{-2}$ as in [ @sh2 ] gives $ \sigma_{NC}\sim 10^{-10}$ fb, to be compare with the SM contribution, $ \sigma_{SM}\sim$ fb at the same center of mass
90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,50)\[c\][$o_1$]{} (105,30)(115,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (115,-40)(105,-30)

1.5cm

(155,120)(-5.0,-20) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,50)\[c\][$k_1$]{} (20,40)(30,30) (0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (20,-40)(30,-30) (45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (60,30)(70,40) (45,0)(90,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,-50)\[c\][$p_2$]{} (60,-30)(70,-40)

Due to the noncomkutatibe naturd of the coordinates, the thelrt is bot Lorentz invariant xnd the rvsults arw freme dependent. In writing down fme am'lmtudes correspokding to eawh of the abova aicgrams, we assume that $\theta \ll 1$ and iake thr dubstitution $\syn(a\tnqta) \mongrightarrow a\theta$, where $a$ is uaed to jenerically denpte the quantity appearing in hhe argument of thf sine funcjjon nultiplied tu $\theta$.\
Choosing to wori in the center of mass frame, wd finb that the w-cyanjgl diagram venishef. The square of the katrix smplitude readx $$|{\methcql{M}}_{NC}|^2 = \left(\frac{e\theta}{16}\cight)^4~[100s^4 + 96t^4 +
204st^3 + 360s^2t^2 + 250s^3t]$$ and the docal (unpolarised) cross swctiot is $$\sigoq_{NC} = (1.5 \uimxs 10^{-3}) \alpha_{fm}^2s^3\vheta^4$$ which for $\sqrt{s}\sum$ TeV and $\theta \lea (10^4~DvF)^{-2}$ as in [@sh2] gjves $\sygia_{NC}\sim 10^{-10}$ fb, to be compared with the SM bontdibution, $\sigma_{SM}\sim$ fb qt the same center of mass
90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (105,30)(115,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (115,-40)(105,-30) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (20,40)(30,30) (0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (20,-40)(30,-30) (45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} to noncommutative nature of coordinates, the theory not Lorentz invariant and the results frame dependent. In writing down the amplitudes corresponding to each of the above we assume that $\theta \ll 1$ and make the substitution $\sin(a\theta) \longrightarrow a\theta$, $a$ used generically the quantity appearing in the argument of the sine function multiplied to $\theta$.\ Choosing to work the center of mass frame, we find that s-channel diagram vanishes. The of the matrix amplitude reads = + 96t^4 204st^3 360s^2t^2 250s^3t]$$ and the (unpolarised) cross section is $$\sigma_{NC} = (1.5 \times 10^{-3}) \alpha_{em}^2s^3\theta^4$$ which for $\sqrt{s}\sim$ TeV and $\theta \leq as in $\sigma_{NC}\sim 10^{-10}$ to compared the SM contribution, at the same center of mass
90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (105,30)(115,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (115,-40)(105,-30)

1.5cm

(155,120)(-5.0,-20) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,50)\[c\][$k_1$]{} (20,40)(30,30) (0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{} (15,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (20,-40)(30,-30) (45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (60,30)(70,40) (45,0)(90,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (75,-50)\[c\][$p_2$]{} (60,-30)(70,-40)

Due to the nonCommutativE natuRe oF thE cOordInatEs, the theory is nOT LorEntz invariant and the resUlts aRe FRame DEpEndenT. In writINg DOWn tHe AmPliTuDEs CorreSpoNding to Each of the aBovE dIagrams, we assUMe That $\theta \lL 1$ anD make the subsTitUtion $\sIn(A\thETa) \lonGriGhtarRow a\thETa$, wherE $a$ is used tO gENericaLLy denotE THe QuanTity appearing in thE ArGUment of the sine FunctiOn MUlTIPliEd tO $\theta$.\
ChooSiNg to wORk in the CEnTER Of mASs frame, we find That the s-chaNNel DiagraM vAniSHes. The SquarE oF The Matrix ampliTude Reads $$|{\mathCal{M}}_{NC}|^2 = \LEft(\frac{E\Theta}{16}\riGht)^4~[100s^4 + 96t^4 +
204sT^3 + 360s^2t^2 + 250S^3t]$$ aNd thE ToTaL (unPoLAriSEd) CroSS seCtion is $$\sIgMa_{nC} = (1.5 \timEs 10^{-3}) \alPHA_{EM}^2s^3\thEta^4$$ WhicH for $\sQrt{s}\sim$ TeV and $\TheTa \leQ (10^4~geV)^{-2}$ As in [@sH2] giveS $\sigMa_{nC}\sim 10^{-10}$ Fb, to be CompaReD with the SM contrIbutIon, $\sigma_{Sm}\siM$ fB at ThE same CEnter oF maSs
90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135 ,45)[3]{}[ 6]{}(12 0,5 0) \[c\ ][$p _1$]{} (105,30 ) (115 ,40) (90,0)(135,-45)[3 ]{}[6 ]{ }  (12 0 ,- 50)\[ c\][$k_ 2 $] { }  (1 15 ,- 40) (1 0 5, -30)
1. 5cm

(1 55,120)(-5 .0, -2 0) (0,45)(45 , 0) [3]{}[6]{}  (1 5,50)\[c\][$ k_1 $]{} ( 20 ,40 ) (30,3 0)(0,-4 5)(45, 0 )[3]{} [6]{} (15 ,- 5 0)\[c\ ] [$k_2$] { }  ( 20,- 40)(30,-30) (45,0 ) (9 0 ,45)[3]{}[6]{}  (75,5 0) \ [c \ ] [$p _1$ ]{} (60,30 )( 70,40 )  (45,0) ( 90 , - 4 5)[ 3 ]{}[6]{} (75, -50)\[c\][$ p _2$ ]{} (6 0, -30 ) (70,-4 0)

D ue tothe noncomm utat ive natur e of t h e coord i nates,the th eor y i s no t  L or ent zi nva r ia nta ndthe resu lt sare f rame d e p ende nt.  Inwriti ng down the a mpl itud e s c orres pondi ng t oeachof the  abov ediagrams, we as sume  that $\t het a\ll  1 $ and make t hesub stituti on $\si n (a\ th e t a )\longrightarrow a\ th e t a$ , where$a$ is us ed to gener ic all y de n o te th e qu a nt ity appe aringi nth e argum en t of t he  si nefunct i on m ultipl ied to $ \thet a $.\
Choosing t o  work in thec en t e ro f ma ssframe, we f indt hatthes -c han n el di agram  v a ni s hes. The square ofth e matr ix am plitude reads  $$|{\math c a l {M}}_{NC }|^2 =\ left(\frac{e\t heta} {16}\right ) ^4~[100s ^4 +96t^4 +204st^3 + 3 60s^2t^2  +250 s^3 t]$ $ an d the total ( u n pola ri sed) cr oss  sectio n i s $ $\s igm a_ {NC} = (1 .5 \time s10 ^{ -3 })\alph a _{em}^2s ^3 \th et a^4 $$ wh i ch for  $\sq rt{s }\ si m $ T eV and$ \t h e ta \ le q(10^ 4~G eV )^{-2 }$ a s  in  [@sh2]  gives $\ sig m a_{N C} \s im 10^{ -10}$ fb, tobe  comparedwi ththe SM c ontribut ion, $\sigma_{SM}\sim$f b at th e s ame c ente r of mass 
90,0)[3]{}[5]{} (90,0)(135,45)[3]{}[6]{}_(120,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (105,30)(115,40)_(90,0)(135,-45)[3]{}[6]{} (120,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (115,-40)(105,-30)

1.5cm

(155,120)(-5.0,-20) (0,45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{}_(15,50)\[c\][$k_1$]{} (20,40)(30,30)_(0,-45)(45,0)[3]{}[6]{}_(15,-50)\[c\][$k_2$]{} (20,-40)(30,-30)_(45,0)(90,45)[3]{}[6]{}_(75,50)\[c\][$p_1$]{} (60,30)(70,40) (45,0)(90,-45)[3]{}[6]{}_(75,-50)\[c\][$p_2$]{} (60,-30)(70,-40)

Due to_the noncommutative nature of_the coordinates, the_theory_is not Lorentz invariant and the results are frame dependent. In writing down the_amplitudes_corresponding to_each_of_the above diagrams, we assume_that $\theta \ll 1$ and_make the_substitution $\sin(a\theta) \longrightarrow a\theta$, where $a$ is used_to_generically denote the_quantity appearing in the argument of the sine function_multiplied to $\theta$.\
Choosing to work in_the center of_mass_frame,_we find that the_s-channel diagram vanishes. The square of_the matrix amplitude reads $$|{\mathcal{M}}_{NC}|^2 =_\left(\frac{e\theta}{16}\right)^4~[100s^4 + 96t^4 +
204st^3 + 360s^2t^2 +_250s^3t]$$ and the total (unpolarised) cross_section is $$\sigma_{NC} = (1.5_\times 10^{-3})_\alpha_{em}^2s^3\theta^4$$ which for $\sqrt{s}\sim$ TeV_and $\theta \leq_(10^4~GeV)^{-2}$ as_in [@sh2] gives_$\sigma_{NC}\sim 10^{-10}$ fb, to be compared_with the SM_contribution, $\sigma_{SM}\sim$ fb at the same_center_of mass