 the accretion flow (Lyubarskii 1997). The closer to the centre, the shorter characteristic timescales of fluctuations. Inevitable, there is a final barrier for propagation, the last stable orbit, which acts as a low-pass filter, removing all frequencies higher than a certain limit. The limiting frequency is inversely proportional to the radius of the last stable orbit and hence to the black hole mass. With a certain shape of the filter any initial spectrum of fluctuations will be truncated to a similar shape at higher frequencies. This might (at least qualitatively) explain the observed universal shape of the high-frequency tail (Done, Gierli[ń]{}ski & Kubota 2007).

Obviously, the size of the last stable orbit depends not only on the black hole mass, but also on its spin. Higher spin would shrink the last stable orbit as if the black hole mass was smaller. This would increase $C_M$ by factor 4.8 for a maximally spinning Kerr black hole with respect to a Schwarzschild one. Alas, the black hole spin is notoriously difficult to measure (compare, e.g., McClintock et al. 2006 and Middleton, Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). The potentially highly spinning GRS 1915+105 has never been observed in the low-luminosity hard spectral state. Another culprit is XTE J1650–500, in which a broad iron line, suggesting high black hole spin, has been reported (Miller et al. 2002, but see also Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). However, as one can see in Fig. \[fig:mcm\] $C_M$ of this source is well below the $C/M$ line, so its high spin does not seem to be supported by our data. On the other hand the mass of black hole in this source is not very well established, so we cannot make any strong statements about it. Fig. \[fig:mcm\] shows that the scatter in $C_M$ for all sources is only factor two, so we do not expect large scatter in black hole spins in the sample.

Yet another factor that might influence the results is the inclination of the disc with respect to the observer. If rapid X-ray variability is produced in flares or fluctuations corotating with the disc, then it is affected by Doppler effects for highly inclined discs. [Ż]{}ycki & Nied[ź]{}wiecki (
the accretion flow (Lyubarskii 1997). The closer to the centre, the shorter characteristic timescales of fluctuation. Inevitable, there be a final barrier for propagation, the last static orbit, which acts as a low - pas filter, removing all frequencies high than a certain limit. The specify frequency is inversely proportional to the radius of the last static orbit and hence to the bootleg hole mass. With a sealed supreme headquarters allied powers europe of the filter any initial spectrum of fluctuations will be truncated to a similar form at higher frequencies. This might (at least qualitatively) excuse the observed cosmopolitan shape of the high - frequency tail (Done, Gierli[ń]{}ski & Kubota 2007). 

 Obviously, the size of the last stable eye socket depends not only on the black hole mass, but also on its spin. Higher spin would shrink the last stable orbit as if the black hole mass was smaller. This would increase $ C_M$ by factor 4.8 for a maximally spinning Kerr bootleg fix with respect to a Schwarzschild one. Alas, the bootleg fix tailspin is notoriously difficult to measure (compare, e.g., McClintock et al. 2006 and Middleton, Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). The potentially highly spinning GRS 1915 + 105 has never been observed in the low - luminosity hard spectral department of state. Another culprit is XTE J1650–500, in which a broad iron line, suggesting high black trap spin, has been reported (Miller et al. 2002, but see also serve & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). However, as one can interpret in Fig. \[fig: mcm\ ] $ C_M$ of this source is well below the $ C / M$ line, so its high spin does not look to be supported by our data. On the other bridge player the mass of black hole in this source is not very well lay down, so we cannot make any firm statements about it. Fig. \[fig: mcm\ ] read that the scatter in $ C_M$ for all sources is merely factor two, so we do not ask large scatter in bootleg hole spins in the sample. 

 however another factor that might charm the results is the inclination of the disc with respect to the observer. If rapid X - ray variability is produced in flare or fluctuations corotating with the disc, then it is affect by Doppler effects for highly inclined discs. [ Ż]{}ycki & Nied[ź]{}wiecki (
 thf accretion flow (Lyubarsyii 1997). The closer to the centrs, the shurter characteristic timescapew of dluctuations. Inevitabld, there id a finao bacrier for propagefion, thc lasf staylx orbit, which agts as a lof-pass filter, ramuvnng all frequencies higher than a cewtain lomlt. The limitind frtquqncy ps inversely proportional to ths radiuv of the last stable orbit and hence to the black hole mass. Wlth a certaun srqpe of the fklter any puitial specjrum of fluctuations will be truvcateb to a simioae sjdpe at highxr frezuencies. This might (dt leasy qualitativeln) expnaib the observed univerval shape of the hygh-frequetcv tail (Done, Gierli[ń]{}ski & Jubotd 2007).

Obeiouroy, ghe smze of thf lest stable krbit depenes not only on the nlwbl hole mass, gut alfo on its spin. Higher spin would shrink tve mast stable orbit as if the black hole mass aas smallqr. This would increase $C_M$ by factor 4.8 for a maximanly s'ivniun Ywrg black hole with respect to a Schwarzschild jhe. Akas, the black mole spin is notorookski difficult to measuxs (dompare, e.g., McClintlck et wl. 2006 abd Middleuon, Dpne & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). The potentiqlly highly fpinning GRS 1915+105 has nzver been obrervgd in yhe low-luminosity hard rpecfral state. Wnother chuprit is XTE J1650–500, iv wmicv a broad iron line, suggeseing high blaek hole rpin, has bqen reportfd (Miller et al. 2002, but see also Dmne & Gierll[ń]{}ski 2006). However, as one can see in Fig. \[fig:mcm\] $C_M$ ox tvis souree is eell below thq $C/M$ line, so ijs high s'in dods not seej to be supported fy our data. Ot the other hend the mwss if boack houd in this sourve is not very well established, so we cavhot make any stxubg statements anoug ie. Vij. \[fig:iwm\] shows thad thd szstter in $C_M$ for clu soirces is only factor two, so we do not expevt large sxatter ig black hole xpins in the samplt.

Yet aiother factpr jhat might influence the resulta is the lncjination of ehe eisc with rexpect to the observer. If rapid X-ray varmability is produced in flares or fluctuatnoks corotatinj with the disc, then it is affected by Doppler effecus for highly inclined siscs. [Ż]{}fcki & Nied[ź]{}wiecki (
the accretion flow (Lyubarskii 1997). The closer centre, shorter characteristic of fluctuations. Inevitable, for the last stable which acts as low-pass filter, removing all frequencies higher a certain limit. The limiting frequency is inversely proportional to the radius of last stable orbit and hence to the black hole mass. With a certain of filter initial of fluctuations will be truncated to a similar shape at higher frequencies. This might (at least explain the observed universal shape of the high-frequency (Done, Gierli[ń]{}ski & Kubota Obviously, the size of the stable depends not on black mass, but also its spin. Higher spin would shrink the last stable orbit as if the black hole mass was This would by factor for maximally Kerr black hole to a Schwarzschild one. Alas, the is notoriously difficult to measure (compare, e.g., McClintock al. 2006 Middleton, Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). The highly spinning GRS 1915+105 has never been observed the low-luminosity hard spectral state. Another culprit is XTE J1650–500, in which a broad iron high black hole spin, been reported (Miller al. but also & Gierli[ń]{}ski However, as one can see in Fig. \[fig:mcm\] $C_M$ of this is well below the $C/M$ line, so its high spin seem be supported by data. On the other the of black hole in is very we make strong statements about it. \[fig:mcm\] shows that the scatter $C_M$ for all sources we do not expect large scatter in black spins in the sample. Yet another factor might influence the results is the inclination of the disc with respect the observer. X-ray variability is produced in flares or fluctuations with the disc, then is affected by Doppler effects for highly inclined discs. & (
 the accretion flow (LyubarskiI 1997). The closer To the CenTre, ThE shoRter Characteristic TImesCales of fluctuations. IneVitabLe, THere IS a Final Barrier FOr PROpaGaTiOn, tHe LAsT stabLe oRbit, whiCh acts as a lOw-pAsS filter, removINg All frequenCieS higher than a CerTain liMiT. ThE LimitIng FrequEncy is INverseLy proportIoNAl to thE Radius oF THe Last Stable orbit and henCE tO The black hole maSs. With A cERtAIN shApe Of the filteR aNy iniTIal specTRuM OF FluCTuations will bE truncated tO A siMilar sHaPe aT Higher FrequEnCIes. this might (at LeasT qualitatIvely) eXPlain thE ObserveD univeRsaL shApe oF ThE hIgh-FrEQueNCy TaiL (donE, Gierli[ń]{}SkI & KUbota 2007).

obviOUSLY, the SizE of tHe lasT stable orbit dEpeNds nOT onLy on tHe blaCk hoLe Mass, bUt also On its SpIn. Higher spin wouLd shRink the laSt sTaBle OrBit as IF the blAck HolE mass waS smalleR. thiS wOULD iNcrease $C_M$ by factor 4.8 fOr A MAxImally spInning kErR bLAck hole wItH reSpecT TO a SchWarzSChIld one. AlAs, the bLAcK hOle spin Is NotoriOuSly DifFiculT To meAsure (cOmpare, e.g., mcCliNTock et al. 2006 and MidDLeton, Done & GierLI[ń]{}SKI 2006). THE potEntIally highly SpinNIng GrS 1915+105 haS NeVer BEen obServeD iN ThE Low-luminosity hard spEcTral stAte. AnOther culprit iS XTE J1650–500, in whiCH A Broad iroN linE, SuGGesting high blaCk holE spin, has beEN reporteD (MillEr et al. 2002, buT see also DONE & Gierli[ń]{}Ski 2006). howEveR, as ONE cAn see in Fig. \[fig:MCM\] $C_M$ oF tHis sourCe iS well beLow The $c/M$ lIne, So Its high spIn does noT sEeM tO bE suPportED by our daTa. on tHe OthEr hanD The masS of blAck hOlE iN ThiS source IS nOT Very WeLl EstaBliShEd, so wE canNOt mAke any sTrong statEmeNTs abOuT iT. Fig. \[fig:Mcm\] shows that tHe Scatter in $C_m$ fOr aLl sourCES is only fActor two, so we do not expect LArge scaTteR in blAck hOle spins iN thE samplE.

YeT AnotheR factoR that MiGht INFluenCE ThE reSuLts is the inCLInaTion oF tHe diSc with rEspect to the observeR. if rApid X-ray variaBilIty iS PRoDucED iN FlaReS Or fLUCtuations corotaTing with thE dISc, Then it is afFEctEd By DopplEr effecTs for HIghly inClined disCs. [Ż]{}ycki & NiEd[Ź]{}wieCKI (
 the accretion flow (Lyuba rskii 1997 ). Th e c los er  tothecentre, the sh o rter  characteristic timesc alesof fluc t ua tions . Inevi t ab l e , t he re  is  a fi nal b arr ier for  propagati on,  t he last stab l eorbit, whi chacts as a lo w-p ass fi lt er, remov ing  allfreque n cies h igher tha na  certa i n limit . Th e li miting frequencyi si nversely propo rtiona lt ot h e r adi us of thela st st a ble orb i ta n d  he n ce to the bla ck hole mas s . W ith ace rta i n shap e ofth e  fi lter any in itia l spectru m of f l uctuati o ns will  be tr unc ate d to asi mil ar sha p eath igh er frequ en ci es. T hism i g h t (a t l east  qual itatively) ex pla in t h e o bserv ed un iver sa l sha pe ofthe h ig h-frequency tai l (D one, Gier li[ ń] {}s ki  & Ku b ota 20 07) .
Obvious ly, the siz eo f th e last stable orbi td e pe nds notonly o n  t he black ho le  ma ss,b u t als o on it s spin.Higher sp in  wouldsh rink t he  la ststabl e  orb it asif the b lackh ole mass was s m aller. This w o ul d in c reas e $ C_M$ by fac tor4 .8 f or a ma xim a lly s pinni ng Ke r r black hole with r es pect t o a S chwarzschildone. Alas, t h e blackhole sp i n is notorious ly di fficult to measure(comp are, e.g ., McClin t o ck et al . 2 006  an d M i d dl eton, Done &G i erli [ń ]{}ski200 6). The  po ten tia lly  h ighly spi nning GR S19 15 +1 05has n e ver been  o bse rv edin th e  low-l umino sity  h ar d  sp ectrals ta t e . An ot he r cu lpr it  is X TE J 1 650 –500, i n which a  br o ad i ro nline, s uggesting hig hblack hole  s pin , hasb e en repor ted (Miller et al. 2002 ,  but se e a lso D one& Gierli[ ń]{ }ski 2 006 ) . Howe ver, a s one  c ans e e inF i g.  \[ fi g:mcm\] $C _ M $ o f thi ssour ce is w ell below the $C/M $  li ne, so its hi ghspin d oe s n o ts eem  t o  be s upported by our  data. Onth e  o ther handt hema ss of b lack ho le in this so urce is n ot very w el l es t a bli shed, so w e cannot  make any stron g  s tatem ent s abou tit.  Fig.  \[fig : mcm \] sh ows th at  the s catte rin $C_M$  for all sources is onl y fact or tw o,so we donot exp ect large  sca tter in bl ack  ho le sp ins in th e sa m pl e.Yet a noth e r factort ha t m i g ht  influencet h e  re sults  is the in clin ation of the disc with respect t o th e obs erv e r. I frapid X-ray va ria bi l i ty is pr od uced in fla res or f lu c tuati ons co rotati ng with t he disc,then  it  is affec ted  b y  Dopple ref f ects f or h ig hly in clined disc s .  [Ż]{}ycki & Nie d[ź]{ } w iecki (
 the_accretion flow_(Lyubarskii 1997). The closer_to the_centre,_the shorter_characteristic_timescales of fluctuations._Inevitable, there is_a final barrier for_propagation, the last_stable_orbit, which acts as a low-pass filter, removing all frequencies higher than a certain_limit._The limiting_frequency_is_inversely proportional to the radius_of the last stable orbit_and hence_to the black hole mass. With a certain_shape_of the filter_any initial spectrum of fluctuations will be truncated to_a similar shape at higher frequencies._This might (at_least_qualitatively)_explain the observed universal_shape of the high-frequency tail (Done,_Gierli[ń]{}ski & Kubota 2007).

Obviously, the size_of the last stable orbit depends not_only on the black hole mass,_but also on its spin._Higher spin_would shrink the last stable_orbit as if_the black_hole mass was_smaller. This would increase $C_M$ by_factor 4.8 for_a maximally spinning Kerr black hole_with_respect to a_Schwarzschild_one._Alas, the_black hole spin_is_notoriously difficult_to_measure (compare, e.g., McClintock et al._2006_and Middleton, Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006). The_potentially highly spinning GRS_1915+105_has never been observed_in the low-luminosity hard spectral_state. Another culprit is XTE J1650–500,_in which_a broad_iron line, suggesting high black hole spin, has been reported (Miller_et al. 2002, but see also_Done & Gierli[ń]{}ski 2006)._However, as_one_can see in_Fig._\[fig:mcm\] $C_M$_of this source is well below the_$C/M$ line,_so its high spin does not_seem to be supported_by_our data. On the other hand_the mass of black hole in_this source is not very_well_established,_so we cannot make any_strong statements about it. Fig. \[fig:mcm\]_shows that the_scatter in $C_M$ for all sources is_only_factor two, so we do not_expect_large scatter in black hole spins_in_the_sample.

Yet another factor that might_influence the results is the inclination_of the disc with respect to the observer. If_rapid X-ray variability_is produced in flares or_fluctuations_corotating_with the disc, then it is affected by Doppler effects_for highly_inclined discs. [Ż]{}ycki_& Nied[ź]{}wiecki (