 Mathematicae, vol. [**144**]{}, issue 1, pp. 23-74.

K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, “Axioms For Euclidean Green’s Functions,” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**31**]{} (1973) 83.

A. S. Wightman, “HilbertÕs sixth problem: Mathematical treatment of the axioms of physics “, in F.E. Browder (ed.): Mathematical Developments Arising from HilbertÕs Problems, Vol. 28:1 of Proc. Symp. Pure Math., Amer. Math. Soc, 1976, pp. 241 - 268.

R. Haag and D. Kastler, “An Algebraic approach to quantum field theory,” J. Math. Phys.  [**5**]{} (1964) 848.

R. Haag, “Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras,” Berlin, Germany: Springer (1992) 356 p. (Texts and monographs in physics). T. Jacobson, S. Liberati and D. Mattingly, “Astrophysical bounds on Planck suppressed Lorentz violation,” Lect. Notes Phys.  [**669**]{} (2005) 101.

S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, “The Quantum structure of space-time at the Planck scale and quantum fields,” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**172**]{} (1995) 187.

[^1]: email: `aastrup@math.uni-hannover.de`

[^2]: email: `jesper.grimstrup@gmail.com`

[^3]: The holonomy-diffeomorphisms, as presented here, are not a priori unitary, but by multiplying with a factor that counters the possible change in volume in (\[chopin1\]) one can make them unitary, see [@AGnew].

[^4]: In [@Higson] these parameters were not included, i.e. $s_n=1\forall n$.

[^5]: The notation $L^2 (\mathbb{R}^\infty )$, which we are using here, is somewhat ambiguous. We are here only considering functions on $\mathbb{R}^\infty $ with a specific tail behaviour, namely the one
Mathematicae, vol. [ * * 144 * * ] { }, issue 1, pp. 23 - 74. 

 K.   Osterwalder and R.   Schrader, “ Axioms For Euclidean Green ’s Functions, ” Commun.   Math.   Phys.    [ * * 31 * * ] { } (1973) 83. 

 A.   S.   Wightman, “ HilbertÕs sixth problem: Mathematical treatment of the maxim of purgative “, in F.E. Browder (ed. ): Mathematical Developments Arising from HilbertÕs Problems, Vol. 28:1 of Proc. Symp. Pure Math. , Amer. Math. Soc, 1976, pp. 241 - 268. 

 R.   Haag and D.   Kastler, “ An Algebraic overture to quantum discipline theory, ” J.   Math.   Phys.    [ * * 5 * * ] { } (1964) 848. 

 R.   Haag, “ Local quantum physics: field, particles, algebras, ” Berlin, Germany: Springer (1992) 356 p. (Texts and monographs in physics). T.   Jacobson, S.   Liberati and D.   Mattingly, “ Astrophysical limit on Planck suppressed Lorentz violation, ” Lect.   Notes Phys.    [ * * 669 * * ] { } (2005) 101. 

 S.   Doplicher, K.   Fredenhagen and J.   E.   Roberts, “ The Quantum social organization of space - time at the Planck scale and quantum fields, ” Commun.   Math.   Phys.    [ * * 172 * * ] { } (1995) 187. 

 [ ^1 ]: email: 'aastrup@math.uni-hannover.de '

 [ ^2 ]: email: 'jesper.grimstrup@gmail.com '

 [ ^3 ]: The holonomy - diffeomorphisms, as presented here, are not a priori unitary, but by multiply with a factor that counters the possible variety in volume in (\[chopin1\ ]) one can make them one, see [ @AGnew ]. 

 [ ^4 ]: In [ @Higson ] these parameter were not included, i.e. $ s_n=1\forall n$. 

 [ ^5 ]: The note $ L^2 (\mathbb{R}^\infty) $, which we are using here, is somewhat ambiguous. We are here only study functions on $ \mathbb{R}^\infty $ with a specific tail behaviour, namely the one
 Mahhematicae, vol. [**144**]{}, issue 1, pk. 23-74.

K. Osterwalder anb R. Schreder, “Axjoms For Euclidean Green’s Functions,” Rommyn. Maty. Phys.  [**31**]{} (1973) 83.

A. S. Wightman, “HilcertÕs sixnh problen: Mauhematical treatmxht of tmz axikls oy 'hysics “, in F.E. Nrowder (ed.): Kathematical Davdllpments Arising from HilbertÕs Problqms, Vol. 28:1 lf Proc. Symp. Pore Mseh., Ajvr. Math. Soc, 1976, pp. 241 - 268.

R. Haag and D. Kaatler, “Ai Algebraic apptoach to quantum field thelry,” U. Math. Phys.  [**5**]{} (1964) 848.

R. Haag, “Pocal quantoj prtsics: Fields, particles, algebras,” Betlin, Germany: Springer (1992) 356 p. (Texts xnd mpnographs un phjvics). T. Jacobwon, S. Jiberati and D. Mattincly, “Asttophysical boukds oi Plqnck suppressed Lorenvz violation,” Lect. Notgs Phys.  [**669**]{} (2005) 101.

V. Dkplicher, K. Fredenhqgwn ang J. E. Sobefrs, “Ghe Qnanfum stgucvure of spade-time at tye Planck scale and qtqntum fields,” Dommun. Iaeh. Phys.  [**172**]{} (1995) 187.

[^1]: email: `aastrup@math.uni-hannover.dt`

[^2]: emajl: `jesper.grimstrup@gmail.xom`

[^3]: The holonomy-diffelmorphismf, as presented here, are not a priori unitary, but ty mumgipoylng dutj a factor that counters the possible change yh fokume in (\[chopin1\]) one can male tngm unitary, see [@AGnew].

[^4]: In [@Higson] these paraleters rere bot incluqed, o.e. $s_n=1\forall n$.

[^5]: The notation $O^2 (\mathbb{R}^\infny )$, qhich we are using here, is sooewhst amniguous. We are here onlv consjdering funftions on $\oathbb{R}^\infty $ wigh s vpecific tail behaviour, naiely the ine
Mathematicae, vol. [**144**]{}, issue 1, pp. 23-74. and Schrader, “Axioms Euclidean Green’s Functions,” 83. S. Wightman, “HilbertÕs problem: Mathematical treatment the axioms of physics “, in Browder (ed.): Mathematical Developments Arising from HilbertÕs Problems, Vol. 28:1 of Proc. Symp. Math., Amer. Math. Soc, 1976, pp. 241 - 268. R. Haag and D. “An approach quantum theory,” J. Math. Phys. [**5**]{} (1964) 848. R. Haag, “Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras,” Berlin, Springer (1992) 356 p. (Texts and monographs in T. Jacobson, S. Liberati D. Mattingly, “Astrophysical bounds on suppressed violation,” Lect. Phys. (2005) S. Doplicher, K. and J. E. Roberts, “The Quantum structure of space-time at the Planck scale and quantum fields,” Commun. Phys. [**172**]{} [^1]: email: [^2]: `jesper.grimstrup@gmail.com` The holonomy-diffeomorphisms, as are not a priori unitary, but a factor that counters the possible change in in (\[chopin1\]) can make them unitary, see [@AGnew]. In [@Higson] these parameters were not included, i.e. n$. [^5]: The notation $L^2 (\mathbb{R}^\infty )$, which we are using here, is somewhat ambiguous. here only considering functions $\mathbb{R}^\infty $ with specific behaviour, the
 Mathematicae, vol. [**144**]{}, issue 1, pp. 23-74.

K. OsTerwalder aNd R. ScHraDer, “axIoms for EUclidean Green’s fUnctIons,” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**31**]{} (1973) 83.

A. S. WiGhtmaN, “HILberTõs Sixth Problem: mAtHEMatIcAl TreAtMEnT of thE axIoms of pHysics “, in F.E. broWdEr (ed.): MathematICaL DevelopmeNts arising from HIlbErtÕs PRoBleMS, Vol. 28:1 oF PrOc. SymP. Pure MATh., Amer. math. Soc, 1976, pp. 241 - 268.

r. HAAg and D. kAstler, “AN aLgEbraIc approach to quantUM fIEld theory,” J. Math. phys.  [**5**]{} (1964) 848.

R. HAaG, “loCAL quAntUm physics: FIeLds, paRTicles, aLGeBRAS,” BeRLin, Germany: SprInger (1992) 356 p. (Texts ANd mOnograPhS in PHysics). t. JacoBsON, S. LIberati and D. mattIngly, “AstrOphysiCAl boundS On PlancK supprEssEd LOrenTZ vIoLatIoN,” lecT. noTes pHys.  [**669**]{} (2005) 101.

s. DoplichEr, k. FRedenHageN AND j. E. RoBerTs, “ThE QuanTum structure oF spAce-tIMe aT the PLanck ScalE aNd quaNtum fiElds,” COmMun. Math. Phys.  [**172**]{} (1995) 187.

[^1]: emaiL: `aasTrup@math.uNi-hAnNovEr.De`

[^2]: emaIL: `jespeR.grImsTrup@gmaIl.com`

[^3]: ThE HolOnOMY-DiFfeomorphisms, as preSeNTEd Here, are nOt a priORi UnITary, but bY mUltIplyING with A facTOr That counTers thE PoSsIble chaNgE in volUmE in (\[ChoPin1\]) onE Can mAke theM unitary, See [@AGNEw].

[^4]: In [@Higson] thesE Parameters werE NoT INcLUded, I.e. $s_N=1\forall n$.

[^5]: The NotaTIon $L^2 (\MathBB{R}^\InfTY )$, whicH we arE uSInG Here, is somewhat ambigUoUs. We arE here Only consideriNg functionS ON $\Mathbb{R}^\iNfty $ WItH A specific tail bEhaviOur, namely tHE one
 Mathematicae, vol. [**144 **]{}, iss ue 1,  pp . 2 3- 74.
K.Osterwalder an d  R.Schrader, “Axioms ForEucli de a n Gr e en ’s Fu nctions , ”C o mmu n.  M ath .P hy s.  [ **3 1**]{}(1973) 83. 

A .S. Wightman, “H ilbertÕs s ixt h problem: M ath ematic al  tr e atmen t o f the  axiom s  of ph ysics “,in F.E. B r owder ( e d .) : Ma thematical Develo p me n ts Arising fro m Hilb er t Õs P rob lem s, Vol. 28 :1  of P r oc. Sym p .P u r e M a th., Amer. Ma th. Soc, 19 7 6,pp. 24 1- 2 6 8.

R.  Haag  a n d D . Kastler,“AnAlgebraic  appro a ch to q u antum f ield t heo ry, ” J. Ma th . P hy s . [ ** 5** ] {}(1964) 8 48 .
R. H aag, “ L o calqua ntum  phys ics: Fields,par ticl e s,algeb ras,”  Ber li n, Ge rmany:  Spri ng er (1992) 356 p . (T exts andmon og rap hs  in p h ysics) . T . J acobson , S. Li b era ti a n dD. Mattingly, “Ast ro p h ys ical bou nds on Pl an c k suppre ss edLore n t z vio lati o n, ” Lect.NotesP hy s.   [**66 9* *]{} ( 20 05)  10 1.

S .  Dop licher , K. Fre denha g en and J. E. R o berts, “The Q u an t u ms truc tur e of space- time at t he P l an cks caleand q ua n tu m  fields,” Commun. M at h. Phy s.  [ **172**]{} (1 995) 187.[ ^ 1]: emai l: ` a as t rup@math.uni-h annov er.de`

[^ 2 ]: email : `je sper.gri mstrup@gm a i l.com`
[^3 ]:The  ho l o no my-diffeomorp h i sms,  a s prese nte d here,  ar e n ota p ri ori unita ry, butby  m ul ti ply ing w i th a fac to r t ha t c ounte r s thepossi blech an g e i n volum e  i n (\[c ho pi n1\] ) o ne  canmake the m unita ry, see [ @AG n ew]. 
[^ 4]: In[@Higson] the se  parameter swer e noti n cluded,i.e. $s_n=1\forall n$.[^5]: T henotat ion$L^2 (\ma thb b{R}^\ inf t y )$,whichwe ar eusi n g  here , is  so me what ambig u o us.  We a re  her e onlyconsidering functi o nson $\mathbb{R }^\ inft y $wit h  a spe ci f ict a il behaviour, n amely theon e 
 Mathematicae,_vol. [**144**]{},_issue 1, pp. 23-74.

K. Osterwalder_and R. Schrader,_“Axioms_For Euclidean_Green’s_Functions,” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**31**]{}_(1973) 83.

A. S. Wightman, “HilbertÕs_sixth problem: Mathematical treatment_of the axioms_of_physics “, in F.E. Browder (ed.): Mathematical Developments Arising from HilbertÕs Problems, Vol. 28:1_of_Proc. Symp._Pure_Math.,_Amer. Math. Soc, 1976, pp._241 - 268.

R. Haag and D. Kastler,_“An Algebraic_approach to quantum field theory,” J. Math. Phys.  [**5**]{} (1964)_848.

R. Haag,_“Local quantum physics:_Fields, particles, algebras,” Berlin, Germany: Springer (1992) 356 p._(Texts and monographs in physics). T. Jacobson,_S. Liberati and D. Mattingly,_“Astrophysical_bounds_on Planck suppressed Lorentz_violation,” Lect. Notes Phys.  [**669**]{} (2005) 101.

S. Doplicher,_K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, “The Quantum structure_of space-time at the Planck scale and_quantum fields,” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**172**]{} (1995) 187.

[^1]:_email: `aastrup@math.uni-hannover.de`

[^2]: email: `jesper.grimstrup@gmail.com`

[^3]: The_holonomy-diffeomorphisms, as_presented here, are not a_priori unitary, but_by multiplying_with a factor_that counters the possible change in_volume in (\[chopin1\])_one can make them unitary, see_[@AGnew].

[^4]:_In [@Higson] these_parameters_were_not included,_i.e. $s_n=1\forall n$.

[^5]:_The_notation $L^2_(\mathbb{R}^\infty_)$, which we are using here,_is_somewhat ambiguous. We are here only considering_functions on $\mathbb{R}^\infty $_with_a specific tail behaviour,_namely the one