 Systematic errors considered in this study are calibrator position uncertainties, station coordinate uncertainties, Earth Orientation Parameters uncertainties and dry and wet troposphere errors. We have adopted state of the art VLBI values for these errors.

Our simulations show that the astrometric accuracy of a full track phase-referenced VLBI experiment is $50~\mu$as at mid declination and is $\sim 300~\mu$as at low ($-25\degr$) and high ($+85\degr$) declinations for point sources angularly separated by $1\degr$. Not surprinsingly, the major systematic error originates from wet tropospheric zenith delay uncertainties except at high declination where calibrator position uncertainties dominate. We show that the astrometric accuracy $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta }$ depends linearly on the source separation and we established the simple formula $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta }
= (\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta, \delta}^{1^{\circ}}-14) \times d+ 14~~(\mu as)$ where $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta}^{1^{\circ}}$ is the astrometric error provided by our tables for the various arrays and configurations and $d=\sqrt{((\alpha -\alpha _0)\cos\delta)^2+(\delta-
\delta_0)^2}$ is the source separation in degrees. Our study has been carried out for point sources but variable source structure is likely to degrade the accuracy derived from this formula.

Analytical Behavior
===================

The analytical formulae in the Appendix A of @Sha79 provide the astrometric errors caused by the inaccuracy of the calibrator coordinates in the case of a single VLBI baseline. Adopting our notation, these formulae become : $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta\alpha &\simeq &((\alpha-\alpha_0)\rm\tan\delta)\Delta\delta_0\\ &&-((\delta-\delta_0)\rm \tan\delta
+1/2\times(\alpha-\alpha_0)^2 ) \Delta\alpha_0,\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta \delta &\simeq &(-(\delta -\delta_0) \cot \delta +1/2 \times
(\alpha -\alpha_0)^2)\Delta\delta_0 +\\
&&((\alpha-\alpha_0) \cot
Systematic errors considered in this study are calibrator placement uncertainty, station coordinate uncertainties, Earth Orientation Parameters uncertainties and dry and besotted troposphere errors. We have adopted state of the artwork VLBI value for these errors. 

 Our simulation show that the astrometric accuracy of a full cut phase - referenced VLBI experiment is $ 50~\mu$as at mid declination and is $ \sim 300~\mu$as at depleted ($ -25\degr$) and high ($ +85\degr$) declinations for point sources angularly separated by $ 1\degr$. Not surprinsingly, the major systematic mistake originates from wet tropospheric zenith delay uncertainties except at high descent where calibrator position uncertainties dominate. We show that the astrometric accuracy $ \Delta _ { \alpha\cos\delta,\delta } $ depend linearly on the source separation and we established the simple formula $ \Delta _ { \alpha\cos\delta,\delta } 
 = (\Delta _ { \alpha\cos\delta, \delta}^{1^{\circ}}-14) \times d+ 14~~(\mu as)$ where $ \Delta _ { \alpha\cos\delta,\delta}^{1^{\circ}}$ is the astrometric mistake provided by our tables for the various arrays and configurations and $ d=\sqrt{((\alpha -\alpha _ 0)\cos\delta)^2+(\delta- 
 \delta_0)^2}$ is the source separation in degrees. Our study has been carried out for point sources but variable source structure is likely to degrade the accuracy deduce from this formula. 

 Analytical Behavior 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The analytical rule in the Appendix A of @Sha79 provide the astrometric errors caused by the inaccuracy of the calibrator coordinates in the shell of a single VLBI baseline. Adopting our notation, these formulae become  : $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \Delta\alpha & \simeq & (( \alpha-\alpha_0)\rm\tan\delta)\Delta\delta_0\\ & & -((\delta-\delta_0)\rm \tan\delta 
 +1/2\times(\alpha-\alpha_0)^2) \Delta\alpha_0,\end{aligned}$$ and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \Delta \delta & \simeq & (-(\delta -\delta_0) \cot \delta +1/2 \times 
 (\alpha -\alpha_0)^2)\Delta\delta_0 + \\ 
 & & (( \alpha-\alpha_0) \cot
 Sydtematic errors considertd in this study cee calmbrator positiov uncertainties, station coorvinare unxertainties, Earth Orievtation Pwrameterw unrertainties and vdy and wet trkiosphzrx errors. We havg adopted stdte of the art VUBN values for these errors.

Our simulatyons shpw that the astrjmetgis acdlrccy of a full track phase-referehced VLUI experiment ix $50~\mu$as at mid declination wnd ls $\sim 300~\mu$as at low ($-25\degr$) and hugh ($+85\qwgr$) declinatkons for point sources angularly separated by $1\degr$. Nog sur'rinsingly, jkw mwbor systemavic ergor originates from wat troppspheric zenitm deley ubcertainties except av high declination wrere calitrctor position uncertaunries gomitate. Qe rhos vhaf the wstcometric acduracy $\Deltq _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delts }$ eepends lineadly on tre source separation and we established ths simple formula $\Delta _{\qlpha\cos\delta,\delta }
= (\Dglta _{\alpha\sos\delta, \delta}^{1^{\circ}}-14) \times d+ 14~~(\mu as)$ where $\Delta _{\alphd\cos\dxlga,\dtlbw}^{1^{\zurf}}$ is the astrometric error provided by our tafmex nor the various crrays and confibugayyons and $d=\sqrj{((\alpha -\cmpga _0)\cos\delta)^2+(\delta-
\depta_0)^2}$ is jhe soyrce sepawatipn in degrees. Our study has been carrieb oyt for point sourczs but variayle soorce syructure is likely to dzgrade the accurafy derives from this formuua.

Akalftical Btfavior
===================

The analytisal formuoae nn the Aopencix A jf @Sha79 progide bve astrometric errlrs ccused by the inwccuracy of the calibrator coorvmnates in the cdse of a siugle VKBI baseline. Wdopting our nptation, thesd formulae become : $$\begin{alignqd}
\Delta\alpha &\vlmeq &((\alpha-\al'ha_0)\rm\tan\dqlta)\Eeltq\delta_0\\ &&-((\adlta-\delta_0)\rm \tam\delta
+1/2\timvs(\clpha-\alphq_0)^2 ) \Delta\alpha_0,\end{allgned}$$ znd $$\begin{aligneb}
\Beota \delta &\simeq &(-(\deuta -\dvlte_0) \cot \gelta +1/2 \times
(\dlphx -\aulha_0)^2)\Deuta\delta_0 +\\
&&((\aliha-\xlphs_0) \cot
Systematic errors considered in this study are uncertainties, coordinate uncertainties, Orientation Parameters uncertainties errors. have adopted state the art VLBI for these errors. Our simulations show the astrometric accuracy of a full track phase-referenced VLBI experiment is $50~\mu$as at declination and is $\sim 300~\mu$as at low ($-25\degr$) and high ($+85\degr$) declinations for sources separated $1\degr$. surprinsingly, the major systematic error originates from wet tropospheric zenith delay uncertainties except at high declination calibrator position uncertainties dominate. We show that the accuracy $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta }$ linearly on the source separation we the simple $\Delta } (\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta, \delta}^{1^{\circ}}-14) d+ 14~~(\mu as)$ where $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta}^{1^{\circ}}$ is the astrometric error provided by our tables for the various and configurations -\alpha _0)\cos\delta)^2+(\delta- is source in degrees. Our been carried out for point sources structure is likely to degrade the accuracy derived this formula. Behavior =================== The analytical formulae in Appendix A of @Sha79 provide the astrometric errors by the inaccuracy of the calibrator coordinates in the case of a single VLBI baseline. notation, these formulae become $$\begin{aligned} \Delta\alpha &\simeq &&-((\delta-\delta_0)\rm +1/2\times(\alpha-\alpha_0)^2 \Delta\alpha_0,\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned} \Delta &\simeq &(-(\delta -\delta_0) \cot \delta +1/2 \times (\alpha -\alpha_0)^2)\Delta\delta_0 +\\ &&((\alpha-\alpha_0)
 Systematic errors considereD in this stuDy are CalIbrAtOr poSitiOn uncertaintieS, StatIon coordinate uncertainTies, EArTH OriENtAtion parametERs UNCerTaInTieS aND dRy and Wet TropospHere errors. we hAvE adopted statE Of The art VLBI ValUes for these eRroRs.

Our sImUlaTIons sHow That tHe astrOMetric Accuracy oF a FUll traCK phase-rEFErEnceD VLBI experiment is $50~\MU$aS At mid declinatiOn and iS $\sIM 300~\mU$AS at Low ($-25\Degr$) and higH ($+85\dEgr$) deCLinatioNS fOR POinT Sources angulaRly separateD By $1\dEgr$. Not SuRprINsinglY, the mAjOR syStematic errOr orIginates fRom wet TRoposphERic zeniTh delaY unCerTainTIeS eXcePt AT hiGH dEclINatIon where CaLiBratoR posITION uncErtAintIes doMinate. We show tHat The aSTroMetriC accuRacy $\deLta _{\alPha\cos\Delta,\DeLta }$ depends lineaRly oN the sourcE sePaRatIoN and wE EstablIshEd tHe simplE formulA $\delTa _{\ALPHa\Cos\delta,\delta }
= (\Delta _{\AlPHA\cOs\delta, \dElta}^{1^{\ciRC}}-14) \tImES d+ 14~~(\mu as)$ whErE $\DeLta _{\aLPHa\cos\DeltA,\DeLta}^{1^{\circ}}$ iS the asTRoMeTric errOr ProvidEd By oUr tAbles FOr thE varioUs arrays And coNFigurations and $D=\Sqrt{((\alpha -\alphA _0)\CoS\DElTA)^2+(\delTa-
\dElta_0)^2}$ is the soUrce SEparAtioN In DegREes. OuR studY hAS bEEn carried out for poinT sOurces But vaRiable source sTructure is LIKEly to degRade THe ACcuracy derived From tHis formula.

aNalyticaL BehaVior
===================

The aNalytical FORmulae in The appEndIx A OF @shA79 provide the asTROmetRiC errors CauSed by thE inAccUraCy oF tHe calibraTor coordInAtEs In The Case oF A single VlBi baSeLinE. AdopTIng our NotatIon, tHeSe FOrmUlae becOMe : $$\BEGin{aLiGnEd}
\DeLta\AlPha &\siMeq &((\aLPha-\Alpha_0)\rm\Tan\delta)\DEltA\DeltA_0\\ &&-((\dElTa-\delta_0)\Rm \tan\delta
+1/2\timEs(\Alpha-\alpha_0)^2 ) \deLta\Alpha_0,\eND{Aligned}$$ aNd $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta \deltA &\Simeq &(-(\deLta -\Delta_0) \Cot \dElta +1/2 \times
(\AlpHa -\alphA_0)^2)\DeLTa\deltA_0 +\\
&&((\alpha-\Alpha_0) \CoT
 Systematic errors conside red in thi s stu dyare  c alib rato r position unc e rtai nties, station coordin ate u nc e rtai n ti es, E arth Or i en t a tio nPa ram et e rs  unce rta intiesand dry an d w et  troposphere er rors. We h ave  adopted sta teof the  a rtV LBI v alu es fo r thes e  error s.

Our s im u lation s  show t h a ttheastrometric accur a cy of a full trac k phas e- r ef e r enc edVLBI exper im ent i s  $50~\m u $a s a t m i d declination  and is $\s i m 3 00~\mu $a s a t  low ( $-25\ de g r$)  and high ( $+85 \degr$) d eclina t ions fo r  pointsource s a ngu larl y  s ep ara te d  by $1 \de g r$.  Not sur pr in singl y, t h e m ajor  sy stem aticerror origina tes  fro m  we t tro posph eric  z enith  delay  unce rt ainties exceptat h igh decli nat io n w he re ca l ibrato r p osi tion un certain t ies  d o m i na te. We show that t he a st rometric  accur a cy  $ \ Delta _{ \a lph a\co s \ delta ,\de l ta  }$ depe nds li n ea rl y on th esource  s epa rat ion a n d we  estab lished t he si m ple formula $\ D elta _{\alpha \ co s \ de l ta,\ del ta }
= (\De lta_ {\al pha\ c os \de l ta, \ delta }^ { 1^ { \circ}}-14) \timesd+  14~~( \mu a s)$ where $\D elta _{\al p h a \cos\del ta,\ d el t a}^{1^{\circ}} $ isthe astrom e tric err or pr ovided b y our tab l e s for th e v ari ous  ar r a ys  and configur a t ions  a nd $d=\ sqr t{((\al pha  -\ alp ha_0 )\cos\del ta)^2+(\ de lt a- 
\ del ta_0) ^ 2}$ is t he  so ur cesepar a tion i n deg rees .Ou r  st udy has be e n  car ri ed  out  fo rpoint  sou r ces  but va riable so urc e  str uc tu re is l ikely to degr ad e the accu ra cyderive d from thi s formula.

AnalyticalB ehavior 
== ===== ==== ========
Th e anal yti c al for mulaein th eApp e n dix A o f@Sh a7 9 providet h e a strom et ricerrorscaused by the inac c ura cy of the cal ibr ator c oo rdi n at e s i nt hec a se of a singleVLBI basel in e .Adopting o u r n ot ation,these f ormul a e becom e : $$\be gin{align ed }
\D e l ta\ alpha &\si meq &((\ alpha-\al p ha_0) \ rm \tan\ del ta)\De lt a\d elta_ 0\\ && - ((\ delta -\delt a_ 0)\rm\tan\ de lta
+1/2 \times(\alpha-\alpha_0) ^2 ) \ Delta \al pha_0,\en d{a l ign ed}$$ and  $$\ begin{alig ned }
\ Delta  \d e lta & \sim e q&(- ( \delt a -\ d elta_0) \ c ot  \d e l ta  +1/2 \time s ( \al pha - \al p ha_0)^ 2)\D elta\delta_0 +\\& &((\alpha-\alp ha_0 ) \co t
 Systematic_errors considered_in this study are_calibrator position_uncertainties,_station coordinate_uncertainties,_Earth Orientation Parameters_uncertainties and dry_and wet troposphere errors._We have adopted_state_of the art VLBI values for these errors.

Our simulations show that the astrometric accuracy_of_a full_track_phase-referenced_VLBI experiment is $50~\mu$as at_mid declination and is $\sim_300~\mu$as at_low ($-25\degr$) and high ($+85\degr$) declinations for point_sources_angularly separated by_$1\degr$. Not surprinsingly, the major systematic error originates from_wet tropospheric zenith delay uncertainties except_at high declination_where_calibrator_position uncertainties dominate. We_show that the astrometric accuracy $\Delta__{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta }$ depends linearly on the_source separation and we established the simple_formula $\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta }
= (\Delta _{\alpha\cos\delta,_\delta}^{1^{\circ}}-14) \times d+ 14~~(\mu as)$_where $\Delta__{\alpha\cos\delta,\delta}^{1^{\circ}}$ is the astrometric error_provided by our_tables for_the various arrays_and configurations and $d=\sqrt{((\alpha -\alpha _0)\cos\delta)^2+(\delta-
\delta_0)^2}$_is the source_separation in degrees. Our study has_been_carried out for_point_sources_but variable_source structure is_likely_to degrade_the_accuracy derived from this formula.

Analytical Behavior
===================

The_analytical_formulae in the Appendix A of @Sha79_provide the astrometric errors_caused_by the inaccuracy of_the calibrator coordinates in the_case of a single VLBI baseline._Adopting our_notation, these_formulae become : $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta\alpha &\simeq &((\alpha-\alpha_0)\rm\tan\delta)\Delta\delta_0\\ &&-((\delta-\delta_0)\rm \tan\delta
+1/2\times(\alpha-\alpha_0)^2 ) \Delta\alpha_0,\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_\delta &\simeq &(-(\delta -\delta_0) \cot \delta_+1/2 \times
(\alpha -\alpha_0)^2)\Delta\delta_0 +\\
&&((\alpha-\alpha_0)_\cot