)}}(f)$, with relative comb index $\mu$ (assuming other sources of laser noise are small by comparison). However this is not the case for a DKS. The frequency-noise multiplication transfer function can be found in numerical simulations based on the Lugiato-Lefever Equation (LLE) [@lugiato_spatial_1987] with parameters similar to that of a typical [Si$_3$N$_4$ ]{}resonator, where instead of a normally CW-driving term we use a pulsed input $F(\phi)$ (where $\phi$ is the spacial coordinate of the cavity) similar in duration to that used in the experiment. It is also slightly positively chirped, in line with our experimental EO-comb compression stage (see Methods and the S.I.), giving a negative phase curvature on the pulse [@AGRAWAL199560]. Frequency noise equivalent to a uniform power-spectral density of $S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ 1.0 Hz$^2$/Hz is applied to the input pulse over a long period of ‘slow time’ ($t>2,000t_\mathrm{photon}$), and the corresponding jitter of the soliton is captured. For this first simulation, we have set $f_\mathrm{eo}$, the input pulse repetition rate, to be equal to the FSR for fully synchronous driving.

The simulation results are shown in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\]. In the time domain (shown in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](a,b)), the generated soliton is located at its ‘trapping point’ at $\sim0.6$ ps at the trailing edge of the pulse[@hendry_spontaneous_2018], but under these synchronous and symmetrical pulse conditions, it may equally find itself at -0.6 ps on the leading edge. As it’s trapped, or locked, to the background input pulse, it inherits jitter and gradually walks back and forth in the ‘fast time’ domain. The noise of the input pulse itself, and its corresponding walk in the time domain, is plotted in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](c).

The corresponding frequency domain results are shown in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](d,e). Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](e) in particular is obtained by taking the Fourier transform over both dimensions of the optical field in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](
) } } (f)$, with relative comb index $ \mu$ (assuming other source of laser randomness are small by comparison). However this is not the case for a DKS. The frequency - randomness multiplication transportation function can be found in numeral pretense based on the Lugiato - Lefever Equation (LLE) [ @lugiato_spatial_1987 ] with parameter similar to that of a typical [ Si$_3$N$_4 $ ] { } resonator, where rather of a normally CW - driving term we practice a pulsed input $ F(\phi)$ (where $ \phi$ is the spacial coordinate of the cavity) similar in duration to that used in the experiment. It is also slenderly positively chirped, in line with our experimental EO - comb compression degree (see Methods and the S.I.), giving a damaging phase curvature on the pulse [ @AGRAWAL199560 ]. Frequency randomness equivalent to a uniform might - spectral density of $ S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ 1.0 Hz$^2$/Hz is applied to the stimulation pulse over a long period of ‘ slow time ’ ($ t>2,000t_\mathrm{photon}$), and the corresponding jitter of the soliton is captured. For this first simulation, we have set $ f_\mathrm{eo}$, the input pulse repetition rate, to be equal to the FSR for fully synchronous driving. 

 The model results are shown in Fig. \[fig: simulation1\ ]. In the prison term knowledge domain (shown in Fig. \[fig: simulation1\](a, b) ), the generated soliton is located at its ‘ caparison point ’ at $ \sim0.6 $ p at the trailing edge of the pulse[@hendry_spontaneous_2018 ], but under these synchronous and harmonious pulse conditions, it may equally find itself at -0.6 ps on the leading edge. As it ’s trapped, or locked, to the background input pulse, it inherits jitter and gradually walk back and away in the ‘ firm time ’ domain. The noise of the input pulsation itself, and its corresponding walk in the time domain, is plotted in Fig. \[fig: simulation1\](c). 

 The corresponding frequency domain results are shown in Fig. \[fig: simulation1\](d, einsteinium). Fig. \[fig: simulation1\](e) in particular is obtained by learn the Fourier transform over both dimensions of the ocular field in Fig. \[fig: simulation1\ ] (
)}}(f)$, wlth relative comb index $\ou$ (assuming othgr sourcxs of lzser noire are small by comparison). Hlwwver ukis is not the case wor a DKS. The frewuenry-noise multiplirztion tvcnsfed funetmon can be founc in numerhcal simulatiots bcsed on the Lugiato-Lefever Equation (JLE) [@lugoaho_spatial_1987] with parsieteds similar to that of a typical [Si$_3$H$_4$ ]{}resonetor, where instrad of a normally CW-drivinh tegm we use a pulsed input $F(\phi)$ (wheww $\phi$ is the spacial coordinate of the cavity) similar in duration to tkat used in tye ffperiment. Iv is ajso slightly positivaly chitped, in line wlth onr ezperimental EO-comb cokpression stage (seg Methods dnb the S.I.), giving a negqtuve pvase curxqtufe kn tge pulde [@EGRAWAL199560]. Fresuency noisw equivalent to a umisirm power-specfral dqnfity of $S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ 1.0 Hz$^2$/Hz is applied to ths input pulse over a lobg period of ‘slow timg’ ($t>2,000t_\mathrm{[hoton}$), and the corresponding jitter of the solitot is raotuxcq. Dog this first simulation, we have set $f_\mathrm{eo}$, fht ikput pulse repetltion rate, to be eauwl jo the FSR for fully syhchronous driving.

Tje simujatiob results are shown in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\]. In the time eomain (shown in Fiy. \[fig:simulatnon1\](a,b)), jhe gemerated soliton is locaced at its ‘trappijg point’ zg $\sim0.6$ ps at the graplinc edge of the pulse[@hendry_s[ontaneouw_2018], buc under ghesg synchwonous and symmcdrical pulse condihions, id may equaply find itself at -0.6 ps on the lxeding edge. As id’s nrapped, ox lockcd, to the backgwound input pukse, it nnherigs jitter znd gravually walks back and fordj in the ‘fasv time’ doiain. The noise uw the input pukse itsely, and its corresponding waui in the time dimaun, is plotted im Fkg. \[sih:smmulaehon1\](c).

The corraspovdivb freduency domaln fesukts are shown in Fig. \[fig:aimulation1\](d,e). Fig. \[fog:fimulatiin1\](e) in pwrticular is pbtained by taking the Houriec tranxfotm over both dimensions of the kptical flelq in Fig. \[fig:fimuoation1\](
)}}(f)$, with relative comb index $\mu$ (assuming of noise are by comparison). However for DKS. The frequency-noise transfer function can found in numerical simulations based on Lugiato-Lefever Equation (LLE) [@lugiato_spatial_1987] with parameters similar to that of a typical [Si$_3$N$_4$ where instead of a normally CW-driving term we use a pulsed input $F(\phi)$ $\phi$ the coordinate the cavity) similar in duration to that used in the experiment. It is also slightly positively in line with our experimental EO-comb compression stage Methods and the S.I.), a negative phase curvature on pulse Frequency noise to uniform density of $S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ Hz$^2$/Hz is applied to the input pulse over a long period of ‘slow time’ ($t>2,000t_\mathrm{photon}$), and the jitter of is captured. this simulation, have set $f_\mathrm{eo}$, pulse repetition rate, to be equal for fully synchronous driving. The simulation results are in Fig. In the time domain (shown in \[fig:simulation1\](a,b)), the generated soliton is located at its point’ at $\sim0.6$ ps at the trailing edge of the pulse[@hendry_spontaneous_2018], but under these synchronous pulse conditions, it may find itself at ps the edge. it’s trapped, locked, to the background input pulse, it inherits jitter and gradually back and forth in the ‘fast time’ domain. The noise input itself, and its walk in the time is in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](c). The domain are \[fig:simulation1\](d,e). \[fig:simulation1\](e) particular is obtained by the Fourier transform over both of the optical field
)}}(f)$, with relative comb index $\mu$ (aSsuming othEr souRceS of LaSer nOise Are small by compARisoN). However this is not the caSe for A Dks. The FReQuencY-noise mULtIPLicAtIoN trAnSFeR funcTioN can be fOund in numeRicAl Simulations bASeD on the LugiAto-lefever EquatIon (lLE) [@lugIaTo_sPAtial_1987] WitH paraMeters SImilar To that of a TyPIcal [Si$_3$n$_4$ ]{}ResonatOR, WhEre iNstead of a normally cw-dRIving term we use A pulseD iNPuT $f(\Phi)$ (WheRe $\phi$ is the SpAcial COordinaTE oF THE caVIty) similar in dUration to thAT usEd in thE eXpeRIment. IT is alSo SLigHtly positivEly cHirped, in lIne witH Our expeRImental eO-comb ComPreSsioN StAgE (seE METhoDS aNd tHE S.I.), Giving a nEgAtIve phAse cURVATure On tHe puLse [@AGrAWAL199560]. FrequencY noIse eQUivAlent To a unIforM pOwer-sPectraL densItY of $S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ 1.0 HZ$^2$/Hz iS applied tO thE iNpuT pUlse oVEr a lonG peRioD of ‘slow Time’ ($t>2,000t_\mAThrM{pHOTOn}$), And the correspondinG jITTeR of the soLiton iS CaPtURed. For thIs FirSt siMULatioN, we hAVe Set $f_\mathRm{eo}$, thE InPuT pulse rEpEtitioN rAte, To bE equaL To thE FSR foR fully syNchroNOus driving.

The sIMulation resulTS aRE ShOWn in fig. \[Fig:simulatiOn1\]. In THe tiMe doMAiN (shOWn in FIg. \[fig:SiMUlATion1\](a,b)), the generated sOlIton is LocatEd at its ‘trappiNg point’ at $\sIM0.6$ PS at the trAiliNG eDGe of the pulse[@heNdry_sPontaneous_2018], BUt under tHese sYnchronoUs and symmETRical pulSe cOndItiOns, IT MaY equally find iTSElf aT -0.6 pS on the lEadIng edge. as iT’s tRapPed, Or Locked, to tHe backgrOuNd InPuT puLse, it INherits jItTer AnD grAdualLY walks Back aNd foRtH iN The ‘Fast timE’ DoMAIn. ThE nOiSe of The InPut puLse iTSelF, and its CorresponDinG Walk In ThE time doMain, is plotted In fig. \[fig:simuLaTioN1\](c).

The cORRespondiNg frequency domain resultS Are showN in fig. \[fiG:simUlation1\](d,e). fig. \[Fig:simUlaTIon1\](e) in ParticUlar iS oBtaINEd by tAKInG thE FOurier tranSFOrm Over bOtH dimEnsions Of the optical field iN fig. \[Fig:simulation1\](
)}}(f)$, with relative com b index $\ mu$ ( ass umi ng  oth er s ources of lase r  noi se are small by compar ison) .H owev e rthisis nott he c ase  f or  aDK S .The f req uency-n oise multi pli ca tion transfe r  f unction ca n b e found in n ume ricalsi mul a tions  ba sed o n theL ugiato -LefeverEq u ation( LLE) [@ l u gi ato_ spatial_1987] wit h  p a rameters simil ar toth a to f  atyp ical [Si$_ 3$ N$_4$ ]{}reso n at o r ,  wh e re instead of  a normally CW- drivin gter m  we us e a p ul s edinput $F(\p hi)$  (where $ \phi$i s the s p acial c oordin ate  of  the ca vi ty)  s i mil a rind ura tion toth at  used  int h e expe rim ent.  It i s also slight lyposi t ive ly ch irped , in  l ine w ith ou r exp er imental EO-comb  com pressionsta ge  (s ee  Meth o ds and  th e S .I.), g iving a neg at i v e  p hase curvature onth e pu lse [@AG RAWAL1 9 95 60 ] . Freque nc y n oise e quiva lent to  a unifo rm pow e r- sp ectralde nsityof  $S _f^ {\mat h rm{( rf)}}( f)=$ 1.0  Hz$^ 2 $/Hz is applie d  to the input pu l s eo vera l ong periodof ‘ s lowtime ’  ( $t> 2 ,000t _\mat hr m {p h oton}$), and the co rr espond ing j itter of thesoliton is c a ptured.Fort hi s  first simulat ion,we have se t  $f_\mat hrm{e o}$, the  input pu l s e repeti tio n r ate , t o be  equal to the F SR f or  fullysyn chronou s d riv ing .
Th e simulat ion resu lt sar esho wn in Fig. \[f ig :si mu lat ion1\ ] . In t he ti me d om ai n  (s hown in Fi g .  \[f ig :s imul ati on 1\](a ,b)) ,  th e gener ated soli ton is l oc at ed at i ts ‘trappingpo int’ at $\ si m0. 6$ psa t  the tra iling edge of the pulse [ @hendry _sp ontan eous _2018], b utunderthe s e sync hronou s and  s ymm e t rical p ul seco nditions,i t  ma y equ al ly f ind its elf at -0.6 ps ont heleading edge.  As  it’ s tr app e d, orlo c ked , to the backgrou nd input p ul s e,  it inheri t s j it ter and  gradua lly w a lks bac k and for th in the  ‘ fast t ime ’ domain.The nois e of thei nputp ul se it sel f, and  i tscorre spondi n g w alk i n theti me dom ain,is  plotted  in Fig. \[fig:simulati on1\]( c).
The  correspo ndi n g f requencydoma in results  ar e s howninF ig. \ [fig : si mul a tion1 \](d , e). Fig.\ [f ig: s i mu lation1\](e ) i n p artic ula r  is ob tain ed by taking theF ourier transfo rm o v e r b oth dime ns ions of the op tic al f ield inFi g. \[fig:si mulation 1\ ] (
)}}(f)$, with_relative comb_index $\mu$ (assuming other_sources of_laser_noise are_small_by comparison). However_this is not_the case for a_DKS. The frequency-noise_multiplication_transfer function can be found in numerical simulations based on the Lugiato-Lefever Equation (LLE)_[@lugiato_spatial_1987]_with parameters_similar_to_that of a typical [Si$_3$N$_4$_]{}resonator, where instead of a_normally CW-driving_term we use a pulsed input $F(\phi)$ (where_$\phi$_is the spacial_coordinate of the cavity) similar in duration to that_used in the experiment. It is_also slightly positively_chirped,_in_line with our experimental_EO-comb compression stage (see Methods and_the S.I.), giving a negative phase_curvature on the pulse [@AGRAWAL199560]. Frequency noise_equivalent to a uniform power-spectral density_of $S_f^{\mathrm{(rf)}}(f)=$ 1.0 Hz$^2$/Hz is_applied to_the input pulse over a_long period of_‘slow time’_($t>2,000t_\mathrm{photon}$), and the_corresponding jitter of the soliton is_captured. For this_first simulation, we have set $f_\mathrm{eo}$,_the_input pulse repetition_rate,_to_be equal_to the FSR_for_fully synchronous_driving.

The_simulation results are shown in Fig._\[fig:simulation1\]._In the time domain (shown in Fig._\[fig:simulation1\](a,b)), the generated soliton_is_located at its ‘trapping_point’ at $\sim0.6$ ps at_the trailing edge of the pulse[@hendry_spontaneous_2018],_but under_these synchronous_and symmetrical pulse conditions, it may equally find itself at -0.6_ps on the leading edge. As_it’s trapped, or locked,_to the_background_input pulse, it_inherits_jitter and_gradually walks back and forth in the_‘fast time’_domain. The noise of the input_pulse itself, and its_corresponding_walk in the time domain, is_plotted in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](c).

The corresponding frequency_domain results are shown in_Fig._\[fig:simulation1\](d,e)._Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](e) in particular is_obtained by taking the Fourier transform_over both dimensions_of the optical field in Fig. \[fig:simulation1\](