
e^{i\omega \tau} \nonumber \\
& = & \frac{1}{2} KT \; + \; e^{-\gamma t/2} \; 
\left [ {\cal U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2} KT \right ] \; \;,\end{aligned}$$ $\left [ {\cal U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2} KT \right ] $ is a measure of departure of energy density from thermal average at $t=0$. The exponential term implies that this deviation due to the initial excitation decays asymptotically to zero as $t\rightarrow \infty$, so that one recovers the usual fluctuation-dissipation relation for the thermal bath. With the above specification of correlation function of $\xi_{\rm neq}$ Eq.(15) thus attributes the nonstationary character of the {$q_k$}-subsystem.

In passing, we stress that the above derivation$^{10}$ is based on the assumption that $\xi_{\rm neq}$ is effectively stationary on the fast correlation of the thermal modes. This is a necessary requirement for the systematic separation of time scales involved in the dynamics. We point out that the effective dynamics sets no choice on any special form of coupling $g(x)$ between the system mode and the relaxing mode and as such this may be of arbitrary nonsingular type for our problem we have considered here.

**[III.The generalized Fokker-Planck description]{}**

Eq.(12) is the required Langevin equation for the particle moving in a modified potential ${\tilde{V}}(x)$ \[Eq.(14)\] and damped by a coordinate-dependent friction $ \Gamma (x) $ \[Eq.(13)\] due to its linear coupling to a thermal bath and nonlinear coupling to the $\{q_k\}$-subsystem characterized by fluctuations $\xi_{\rm neq} (t)$. Before proceeding further a few pertinent points are to be noted to stress some distinct and important aspects of the model.

First, depending on the system-{$q_k$}-subsystem coupling $g(x)$ both the modified potential ${\tilde{V}}(x)$ as well as $\Gamma(x)$ are, in general, nonlinear. So the stochastic differential equation (12) is nonlinear. Again, the stochasticity in Eq.(12) is composed of two parts : $\xi_{\rm eq} (t)$ is an additive noise due to
e^{i\omega \tau } \nonumber \\ 
 & = & \frac{1}{2 } KT \; + \; e^{-\gamma t/2 } \; 
 \left [ { \cal U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2 } KT \right ] \; \;,\end{aligned}$$ $ \left [ { \cal U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2 } KT \right ] $ is a measure of departure of energy density from thermal average at $ t=0$. The exponential condition entail that this deviation due to the initial excitation decays asymptotically to zero as $ t\rightarrow \infty$, so that one recuperate the usual fluctuation - waste relative for the thermal bath. With the above specification of correlation function of $ \xi_{\rm neq}$ Eq.(15) therefore attributes the nonstationary character of the { $ q_k$}-subsystem. 

 In passing, we stress that the above derivation$^{10}$ is free-base on the assumption that $ \xi_{\rm neq}$ is effectively stationary on the fast correlation of the thermal modes. This is a necessary necessity for the systematic separation of time scale involved in the dynamics. We point out that the effective dynamics set no choice on any special form of coupling $ g(x)$ between the system mood and the relaxing mode and as such this may be of arbitrary nonsingular type for our problem we have considered here. 

 * * [ III.The generalized Fokker - Planck description ] { } * * 

 Eq.(12) is the required Langevin equation for the particle moving in a modified potential $ { \tilde{V}}(x)$ \[Eq.(14)\ ] and damped by a coordinate - dependent friction $ \Gamma (x) $ \[Eq.(13)\ ] due to its linear coupling to a thermal bath and nonlinear yoke to the $ \{q_k\}$-subsystem qualify by fluctuations $ \xi_{\rm neq } (t)$. Before go far a few pertinent points are to be noted to stress some distinct and important aspects of the exemplar. 

 First, depending on the system-{$q_k$}-subsystem coupling $ g(x)$ both the modified potential $ { \tilde{V}}(x)$ as well as $ \Gamma(x)$ are, in cosmopolitan, nonlinear. So the stochastic differential equation (12) is nonlinear. Again, the stochasticity in Eq.(12) is composed of two parts: $ \xi_{\rm eq } (t)$ is an additive noise due to

e^{i\olega \tau} \nonumber \\
& = & \frag{1}{2} KT \; + \; e^{-\gamma t/2} \; 
\left [ {\cal U}(\kmega,0) - \ffac{1}{2} KT \right ] \; \;,\end{aligned}$$ $\leht [ {\xal U}(\imega,0) - \frac{1}{2} KT \right ] $ is a meadure of eepacture of energy vsnsity nxom tgcrmal everage at $t=0$. Thg exponentian term implies tfac this deviation due to the initial qxcitatooj decays asympjoticsjly fo zero as $t\rightarrow \infty$, so thzt one gecovers the usuak fluctuation-dissipation rflatlon for the thermap bath. With the qbove specifkcation of correlation function of $\xi_{\rm neq}$ Eq.(15) thus agtribbtes the nobsratlmnary chararter os the {$q_k$}-subsnxtem.

In passinb, we stress thst vhe qbove derivation$^{10}$ is besed on the assumptijn that $\xh_{\rj neq}$ is effectivwlt stajionasy ov thd fzsv ckrrelahioi of the thsrmal modes. This is a necessaru wvauirement fod the fyftematic separation of time scales invonves in the dynamics. We pount out that the effeftive dynwmics sets no choice on any special form of couplhng $g(e)$ cetcccn tfw dystem mode and the relaxing mode and as such fhos may be of arbltrary nonsingular tjpr for our probuem we habe considered here.

**[LII.The denerqlized Fohker-Llanck description]{}**

Eq.(12) is the required Laugecin equation for tke particle oovimg in a modified potential ${\tnlde{V}}(x)$ \[Eq.(14)\] and damoed by a duordinate-dependevt nriwtion $ \Gamma (x) $ \[Eq.(13)\] due to yts lineac cou'ling to a tnermal bath and jonlikaar coupling to thf $\{q_k\}$-sobsystam charactfrized by fluctuations $\xi_{\rm neq} (t)$. Before procgedhng further a fee pertinent pjints are to bg noted tj strdss some dpstinct aid important aspects of tvg model.

First, vepending on rhe wystem-{$q_y$}-rubsystem coupking $g(x)$ both the moeified potential ${\tllde{V}}(b)$ as well as $\Gamna(x)$ are, in general, novligewr. Sj the stochasdic aifwrrentkal equatiok (12) ks npnlinear. Again, the sdochzsticity in Eq.(12) is voiposed od two pawts : $\xi_{\rm eq} (y)$ is an additive nlise vue to
e^{i\omega \tau} \nonumber \\ & = & \; \; e^{-\gamma \; \left [ \right \; \;,\end{aligned}$$ $\left {\cal U}(\omega,0) - KT \right ] $ is a of departure of energy density from thermal average at $t=0$. The exponential term that this deviation due to the initial excitation decays asymptotically to zero as \infty$, that recovers usual fluctuation-dissipation relation for the thermal bath. With the above specification of correlation function of $\xi_{\rm Eq.(15) thus attributes the nonstationary character of the In passing, we stress the above derivation$^{10}$ is based the that $\xi_{\rm is stationary the fast correlation the thermal modes. This is a necessary requirement for the systematic separation of time scales involved in dynamics. We that the dynamics no on any special coupling $g(x)$ between the system mode mode and as such this may be of nonsingular type our problem we have considered here. generalized Fokker-Planck description]{}** Eq.(12) is the required Langevin for the particle moving in a modified potential ${\tilde{V}}(x)$ \[Eq.(14)\] and damped by a coordinate-dependent \Gamma (x) $ \[Eq.(13)\] to its linear to thermal and coupling to $\{q_k\}$-subsystem characterized by fluctuations $\xi_{\rm neq} (t)$. Before proceeding further a pertinent points are to be noted to stress some distinct aspects the model. First, on the system-{$q_k$}-subsystem coupling both modified potential ${\tilde{V}}(x)$ as $\Gamma(x)$ in the differential (12) is nonlinear. Again, stochasticity in Eq.(12) is composed two parts : $\xi_{\rm noise due to

e^{i\omega \tau} \nonumber \\
& = & \frac{1}{2} KT \; + \; e^{-\Gamma t/2} \; 
\left [ {\Cal U}(\oMegA,0) - \frAc{1}{2} kT \riGht ] \; \;,\eNd{aligned}$$ $\left [ {\cAL U}(\omEga,0) - \frac{1}{2} KT \right ] $ is a measuRe of dEpARturE Of EnergY densitY FrOM TheRmAl AveRaGE aT $t=0$. The ExpOnentiaL term impliEs tHaT this deviatiON dUe to the iniTiaL excitation dEcaYs asymPtOtiCAlly tO zeRo as $t\RightaRRow \infTy$, so that oNe REcoverS The usuaL FLuCtuaTion-dissipation reLAtIOn for the thermaL bath. WItH ThE ABovE spEcificatioN oF corrELation fUNcTION of $\XI_{\rm neq}$ Eq.(15) thus aTtributes thE NonStatioNaRy cHAracteR of thE {$q_K$}-SubSystem.

In pasSing, We stress tHat the ABove derIVation$^{10}$ iS based On tHe aSsumPTiOn ThaT $\xI_{\Rm nEQ}$ iS efFEctIvely staTiOnAry on The fAST COrreLatIon oF the tHermal modes. ThIs iS a neCEssAry reQuireMent FoR the sYstemaTic sePaRation of time scaLes iNvolved in The DyNamIcS. We poINt out tHat The EffectiVe dynamICs sEtS NO ChOice on any special foRm OF CoUpling $g(x)$ BetweeN ThE sYStem mode AnD thE relAXIng moDe anD As Such this May be oF ArBiTrary noNsIngulaR tYpe For Our prOBlem We have ConsiderEd herE.

**[iII.The generaliZEd Fokker-PlancK DeSCRiPTion]{}**

eq.(12) iS the requireD LanGEvin EquaTIoN foR The paRticlE mOViNG in a modified potentiAl ${\Tilde{V}}(X)$ \[Eq.(14)\] anD damped by a cooRdinate-depENDEnt frictIon $ \GAMmA (X) $ \[Eq.(13)\] due to its linEar coUpling to a tHErmal batH and nOnlinear Coupling tO THe $\{q_k\}$-subsYstEm cHarActERIzEd by fluctuatiONS $\xi_{\rM nEq} (t)$. BefoRe pRoceediNg fUrtHer A feW pErtinent pOints are To Be NoTeD to StresS Some distInCt aNd ImpOrtanT AspectS of thE modEl.

fiRSt, dEpendinG On THE sysTeM-{$q_K$}-subSysTeM coupLing $G(X)$ boTh the moDified potEntIAl ${\tiLdE{V}}(X)$ as well As $\Gamma(x)$ are, in GeNeral, nonliNeAr. SO the stOCHastic diFferential equation (12) is nonLInear. AgAin, The stOchaSticity in eq.(12) iS compoSed OF two paRts : $\xi_{\rM eq} (t)$ iS aN adDITive nOISe Due To

e^{i\omega \tau} \nonumbe r \\
& = &  \fra c{1 }{2 }KT \ ; +\; e^{-\gammat /2}\; 
\left [ {\cal U}(\ omega ,0 )  - \ f ra c{1}{ 2} KT \ r ig h t  ]\;  \ ;,\ en d {a ligne d}$ $ $\lef t [ {\calU}( \o mega,0) - \f r ac {1}{2} KT\ri ght ] $ is a  me asureof  de p artur e o f ene rgy de n sity f rom therm al averag e  at $t= 0 $ .Theexponential termi mp l ies that thisdeviat io n  d u e  to  th e initialex citat i on deca y sa s y mpt o tically to ze ro as $t\ri g hta rrow \ in fty $ , so t hat o ne rec overs the u sual  fluctuat ion-di s sipatio n  relati on for  th e t herm a lba th.  W i tht he  ab o vespecific at io n ofcorr e l a t ionfun ctio n of$\xi_{\rm neq }$Eq.( 1 5)thusattri bute sthe n onstat ionar ycharacter of th e {$ q_k$}-sub sys te m.
I n pas s ing, w e s tre ss that  the ab o vede r i v at ion$^{10}$ is base do n  t he assum ptiont ha t$ \xi_{\rm  n eq} $ is e ffect ivel y  s tationar y on t h efa st corr el ationof  th e t herma l  mod es. Th is is aneces s ary requiremen t  for the syst e ma t i cs epar ati on of timescal e s in volv e dint he dy namic s. We point out that theef fectiv e dyn amics sets no  choice on a n y specia l fo r mo f coupling $g( x)$ b etween the system m ode a nd the r elaxing m o d e and as  su chthi s m a y  b e of arbitrar y nons in gular t ype  for ou r p rob lem  we  h ave consi dered he re .
* *[ III .Theg eneraliz ed  Fo kk er- Planc k  descr iptio n]{} ** 
E q.( 12) ist he r equi re dLang evi nequat ionf orthe par ticle mov ing in a  m od ified p otential ${\t il de{V}}(x)$  \ [Eq .(14)\ ] and damp ed by a coordinate-depe n dent fr ict ion $  \Ga mma (x) $  \[ Eq.(13 )\] due to  its l inear  c oup l i ng to a  t her ma l bath and n onl inear  c oupl ing tothe $\{q_k\}$-subs y ste m characteriz edby f l u ct uat i on s  $\ xi _ {\r m neq} (t)$. Befo re proceed in g  f urther a f e w p er tinentpointsare t o  be not ed to str ess somedi stin c t  an d importan t aspect s of them odel. 
F irst,  de pendin gonthe s ystem- { $q_ k$}-s ubsyst em  coupl ing $ g( x)$ both  the modified potential  ${\ti lde{V }}( x)$ as we lla s $ \Gamma(x) $ ar e, in gene ral , n onlin ear .  So t he s t oc has t ic di ffer e ntial equ a ti on( 1 2)  is nonline a r .  Ag ain,the stocha stic ity in Eq.(12) is composed of tw o pa r t s :  $\ x i_{\ rm  eq} (t)$ is a n a dd i t ive nois edue to

e^{i\omega \tau}_\nonumber \\
&_= & \frac{1}{2} KT_\; +_\;_e^{-\gamma t/2}_\;_
\left [ {\cal_U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2}_KT \right ] \;_\;,\end{aligned}$$ $\left [_{\cal_U}(\omega,0) - \frac{1}{2} KT \right ] $ is a measure of departure of energy_density_from thermal_average_at_$t=0$. The exponential term implies_that this deviation due to_the initial_excitation decays asymptotically to zero as $t\rightarrow \infty$,_so_that one recovers_the usual fluctuation-dissipation relation for the thermal bath. With_the above specification of correlation function_of $\xi_{\rm neq}$_Eq.(15)_thus_attributes the nonstationary character_of the {$q_k$}-subsystem.

In passing, we stress_that the above derivation$^{10}$ is based_on the assumption that $\xi_{\rm neq}$ is_effectively stationary on the fast correlation_of the thermal modes. This_is a_necessary requirement for the systematic_separation of time_scales involved_in the dynamics._We point out that the effective_dynamics sets no_choice on any special form of_coupling_$g(x)$ between the_system_mode_and the_relaxing mode and_as_such this_may_be of arbitrary nonsingular type for_our_problem we have considered here.

**[III.The generalized Fokker-Planck_description]{}**

Eq.(12) is the required_Langevin_equation for the particle_moving in a modified potential_${\tilde{V}}(x)$ \[Eq.(14)\] and damped by a_coordinate-dependent friction_$ \Gamma_(x) $ \[Eq.(13)\] due to its linear coupling to a thermal_bath and nonlinear coupling to the_$\{q_k\}$-subsystem characterized by fluctuations_$\xi_{\rm neq}_(t)$._Before proceeding further_a_few pertinent_points are to be noted to stress_some distinct_and important aspects of the model.

First,_depending on the system-{$q_k$}-subsystem_coupling_$g(x)$ both the modified potential ${\tilde{V}}(x)$_as well as $\Gamma(x)$ are, in_general, nonlinear. So the stochastic_differential_equation_(12) is nonlinear. Again, the_stochasticity in Eq.(12) is composed of_two parts :_$\xi_{\rm eq} (t)$ is an additive noise_due_to