 appears that although the authors of Ref. [@prior] did consider photopion production by secondary nucleons, they neglected pair production by protons and nuclei and photopion production by secondary nuclei [@gelmini].

[*Summary*]{}: We find that if ultra-high cosmic rays consist largely of heavy or intermediate mass nuclei, then the cosmogenic photon flux will be suppressed by about a factor of 10 relative to that expected for proton primaries. This provides a means of potentially discriminating between composition scenarios that is not subject to the uncertainties associated with hadronic interaction models. As the Pierre Auger Observatory continues to collect data, it is projected to reach the sensitivity required to use this distinction to constrain the chemical composition of the UHECRs. This would be complementary to the information potentially provided by future measurements of the cosmogenic neutrino flux which depends significantly on the cosmological evolution of UHECR sources – greater or fewer sources at high redshifts would lead to a higher or lower neutrino flux, respectively [@evolution]. In contrast, since any observed ultra-high energy photons must have originated within $\sim$100 Mpc, cosmological source evolution cannot affect their flux.

[*Acknowledgements:*]{} We are grateful to Graciela Gelmini for clarifications of earlier work and to Markus Risse for helpful correspondence. DH is supported by the US Department of Energy, including grant DE-FG02-95ER40896, and by NASA grant NAG5-10842. SS acknowledges support by the EU Marie Curie Network “UniverseNet” (HPRN-CT-2006-035863).

[99]{}

J. Abraham [*et al.*]{} \[Pierre Auger Collaboration\], Phys. Rev. Lett.  [**104**]{}, 091101 (2010); arXiv:0906.2319; D. Hooper and A. M. Taylor, Astropart. Phys.  [**33**]{}, 151 (2010). J. Engel, T. K. Gaisser, T. Stanev and P. Lipari, Phys. Rev. D [**46**]{}, 5013 (1992); R. S. Fletcher, T. K. Gaisser, P. Lipari and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D [**50**]{}, 5710 (1994); N. N. Kalmykov, S. S. Ostapchenko and A
appears that although the authors of Ref.   [ @prior ] did consider photopion production by junior-grade nucleon, they neglect pair product by proton and nuclei and photopion production by secondary nucleus [ @gelmini ]. 

 [ * Summary * ] { }: We find that if ultra - eminent cosmic rays consist largely of big or intermediate mass lens nucleus, then the cosmologic photon flux will be suppressed by about a agent of 10 relative to that expected for proton primaries. This supply a means of potentially discriminating between composition scenario that is not subject to the uncertainties associated with hadronic interaction model. As the Pierre Auger Observatory continues to collect data, it is projected to reach the sensitivity command to use this distinction to constrain the chemical composition of the UHECRs. This would be complementary to the information potentially provided by future measurements of the cosmogenic neutrino flux which depends significantly on the cosmological evolution of UHECR sources – greater or fewer reference at high redshifts would run to a eminent or lower neutrino flux, respectively   [ @evolution ]. In contrast, since any watch ultra - high energy photons must have originate within $ \sim$100 Mpc, cosmological source evolution cannot affect their flux. 

 [ * Acknowledgements :* ] { } We are grateful to Graciela Gelmini for clearing of earlier work and to Markus Risse for helpful correspondence. DH is supported by the US Department of Energy, include grant DE - FG02 - 95ER40896, and by NASA grant NAG5 - 10842. SS acknowledge support by the EU Marie Curie Network “ UniverseNet ” (HPRN - CT-2006 - 035863). 

 [ 99 ] { } 

 J.   Abraham [ * et al. * ] { } \[Pierre Auger Collaboration\ ], Phys.   Rev.   Lett.    [ * * 104 * * ] { }, 091101 (2010); arXiv:0906.2319; D.   Hooper and A.   M.   Taylor, Astropart.   Phys.    [ * * 33 * * ] { }, 151 (2010). J.   Engel, T.   K.   Gaisser, T.   Stanev and P.   Lipari, Phys.   Rev.   D [ * * 46 * * ] { }, 5013 (1992); R.   S.   Fletcher, T.   K.   Gaisser, P.   Lipari and T.   Stanev, Phys.   Rev.   D [ * * 50 * * ] { }, 5710 (1994); N.   N.   Kalmykov, S.   S.   Ostapchenko and A
 apoears that although the xuthors of Ref. [@ptiir] did consiser photupion production by secondarb nuxleonw, they neglected pair oroductioj by prorons qnd nuclei and phobjpioh proburtion by secondsry nuclei [@gelmini].

[*Summarf*]{}: De find that if ultra-high cosmic rays consisy pargely of heady og yntedmediate mass nuclei, then the cosmkgenic khoton flux will br suppressed by about a faftor of 10 relative to tjat expectee fow proton primxries. This provides a jeans of potentially discriminaging yetween comkoaihhon scenariis thwt is not sunkect tm the umcertainties axsoriatwd with hadronic intecaction models. As thg Pierre Aggzr Observatory continyew to wollact aqta, it ix lrojeched to reach fhe sensiticity required to ust trpx distinctioh to cjnftrain the chemical composition of the LHECDs. This would be complenentary to the informwtion potqntially provided by future measurements of the cmsmogxnkc ucmtrivi vlux which depends significantly on the cosmojkgocsl evolution on UHECR sources – gtewtrt or fewer soutces at hifh redshifts would lead tj a hugher or jowet neutrino flux, respectivelt [@evolution]. Iu cintrast, since any lbserved ulcra-hign enetgy photons must have oxiginafed within $\dim$100 Mpc, ckrmological sourcd enoludion cannot affect their fjux.

[*Acknowoedgzments:*]{} Wd arg gratesul to Grafiela Gelmini for clariflcatilnv of earlifr work and to Markus Risse for helpful correxpmndvnce. DH if supiorted by the UF Department oy Energy, incljding grann DE-FG02-95ER40896, end by NASA drant NAG5-10842. SS dfknowledges vupport fy tye EY Marie Zurie Network “IniverseNvt” (HPRB-CT-2006-035863).

[99]{}

J. Abraham [*et al.*]{} \[Iierrg Zuger Collaboracnob\], Phys. Rev. Lett.  [**104**]{}, 091101 (2010); afXid:0906.2319; F. Hpo[ar and A. M. Taynor, Xstfppart. Ohys.  [**33**]{}, 151 (2010). J. Ennel, T. K. Gsisser, T. Stanev and P. Nipadi, Phys. Rev. D [**46**]{}, 5013 (1992); R. S. Fkebcher, T. K. Gqisser, P. Jipari and T. Syanev, Phys. Rev. D [**50**]{}, 5710 (1994); J. N. Kalkykuv, S. S. Pstwpchenko and A
appears that although the authors of Ref. consider production by nucleons, they neglected nuclei photopion production by nuclei [@gelmini]. [*Summary*]{}: find that if ultra-high cosmic rays largely of heavy or intermediate mass nuclei, then the cosmogenic photon flux will suppressed by about a factor of 10 relative to that expected for proton This a of discriminating between composition scenarios that is not subject to the uncertainties associated with hadronic interaction models. the Pierre Auger Observatory continues to collect data, is projected to reach sensitivity required to use this to the chemical of UHECRs. would be complementary the information potentially provided by future measurements of the cosmogenic neutrino flux which depends significantly on the evolution of – greater fewer at redshifts would lead higher or lower neutrino flux, respectively since any observed ultra-high energy photons must have within $\sim$100 cosmological source evolution cannot affect their [*Acknowledgements:*]{} We are grateful to Graciela Gelmini for of earlier work and to Markus Risse for helpful correspondence. DH is supported by the of Energy, including grant and by NASA NAG5-10842. acknowledges by EU Marie Network “UniverseNet” (HPRN-CT-2006-035863). [99]{} J. Abraham [*et al.*]{} \[Pierre Auger Collaboration\], Rev. Lett. [**104**]{}, 091101 (2010); arXiv:0906.2319; D. Hooper and A. Astropart. [**33**]{}, 151 (2010). Engel, T. K. Gaisser, Stanev P. Lipari, Phys. Rev. 5013 R. K. P. and T. Stanev, Phys. D [**50**]{}, 5710 (1994); N. Kalmykov, S. S. Ostapchenko
 appears that although the autHors of Ref. [@pRior] dId cOnsIdEr phOtopIon production bY SecoNdary nucleons, they negleCted pAiR ProdUCtIon by Protons ANd NUCleI aNd PhoToPIoN prodUctIon by seCondary nucLei [@GeLmini].

[*Summary*]{}: wE fInd that if uLtrA-high cosmic rAys ConsisT lArgELy of hEavY or inTermedIAte masS nuclei, thEn THe cosmOGenic phOTOn Flux Will be suppressed bY AbOUt a factor of 10 relAtive tO tHAt EXPecTed For proton pRiMarieS. this proVIdES A MeaNS of potentiallY discriminaTIng BetweeN cOmpOSition ScenaRiOS thAt is not subjEct tO the uncerTaintiES associATed with HadronIc iNteRactIOn MoDelS. AS The pIeRre aUgeR ObservaToRy ContiNues TO COLlecT daTa, it Is proJected to reach The SensITivIty reQuireD to uSe This dIstincTion tO cOnstrain the chemIcal CompositiOn oF tHe UhEcRs. ThIS would Be cOmpLementaRy to the INfoRmATIOn Potentially provideD bY FUtUre measuRementS Of ThE CosmogenIc NeuTrinO FLux whIch dEPeNds signiFicantLY oN tHe cosmoLoGical eVoLutIon Of UHEcr souRces – grEater or fEwer sOUrces at high redSHifts would leaD To A HIgHEr or LowEr neutrino fLux, rESpecTiveLY [@eVolUTion]. IN contRaST, sINce any observed ultra-HiGh enerGy phoTons must have oRiginated wITHIn $\sim$100 Mpc, CosmOLoGIcal source evolUtion Cannot affeCT their flUx.

[*AckNowledgeMents:*]{} We arE GRateful tO GrAciEla gelMINi For clarificatIONs of EaRlier woRk aNd to MarKus risSe fOr hElPful correSpondencE. Dh iS sUpPorTed by THe US DepaRtMenT oF EnErgy, iNCludinG granT DE-Fg02-95Er40896, aND by nASA graNT Nag5-10842. sS acKnOwLedgEs sUpPort bY the eu MaRie CuriE Network “UNivERseNEt” (hPrN-CT-2006-035863).

[99]{}

J. AbRaham [*et al.*]{} \[PierRe auger CollaBoRatIon\], PhyS. rEv. Lett.  [**104**]{}, 091101 (2010); arxiv:0906.2319; D. Hooper and A. M. Taylor, AsTRopart. PHys.  [**33**]{}, 151 (2010). j. EngeL, T. K. GAisser, T. StAneV and P. LIpaRI, Phys. REv. D [**46**]{}, 5013 (1992); R. S. FLetchEr, t. K. GAISser, P. lIPaRi aNd t. Stanev, PhyS. rEv. D [**50**]{}, 5710 (1994); n. N. KalMyKov, S. s. OstapcHenko and A
 appears that although the  authors o f Ref . [ @pr io r] d id c onsider photop i on p roduction by secondary  nucl eo n s, t h ey  negl ected p a ir p rod uc ti onby pr otons  an d nucle i and phot opi on  productionb ysecondarynuc lei [@gelmin i]. 

[*Su mm ary * ]{}:Wefindthat i f  ultra -high cos mi c  raysc onsistl a rg elyof heavy or inter m ed i ate mass nucle i, the nt he c osm oge nic photon  f lux w i ll be s u pp r e s sed by about a fa ctor of 10r ela tive t otha t  expec ted f or pro ton primari es.This prov ides a means o f  potent iallydis cri mina t in gbet we e n c o mp osi t ion  scenari os  t hat i s no t s u bjec t t o th e unc ertainties as soc iate d  wi th ha droni c in te racti on mod els.As  the Pierre Aug er O bservator y c on tin ue s toc ollect  da ta,  it isproject e d t or e a ch  the sensitivity r eq u i re d to use  thisd is ti n ction to  c ons trai n the c hemi c al  composi tion o f  t he  UHECRs .This w ou ldbecompl e ment ary to  the inf ormat i on potentially provided by f u tu r e  m e asur eme nts of thecosm o geni c ne u tr ino fluxwhich  d e pe n ds significantly on  t he cos molog ical evolutio n of UHECR s o urces –grea t er or fewer sourc es at  high reds h ifts wou ld le ad to ahigher or l ower neu tri noflu x,r e sp ectively [@ev o l utio n] . In co ntr ast, si nce  an y o bse rv ed ultra- high ene rg yph ot ons  must have ori gi nat ed  wi thin$ \sim$1 00 Mp c, c os mo l ogi cal sou r ce e volu ti on  can not  a ffect  the i r f lux.

[ *Acknowle dge m ents :* ]{ } We ar e grateful to  G raciela Ge lm ini  for c l a rificati ons of earlier work and to Mark usRisse  for  helpfulcor respon den c e. DHis sup porte dbyt h e USD e pa rtm en t of Energ y ,  in cludi ng  gra nt DE-F G02-95ER40896, and byNASA grant NA G5- 1084 2 .  S S a c kn o wle dg e s s u p port by the EUMarie Curi eN et work “Univ e rse Ne t” (HPR N-CT-20 06-03 5 863).
[99]{}

J . Abraham  [ *eta l .*] {} \[Pierr e AugerCollabora t ion\] ,  P hys.Rev . Lett . [* *104* *]{},0 911 01 (2 010);ar Xiv:09 06.23 19 ; D. Hoo per and A. M. Taylor, A stropa rt. P hys .  [**33* *]{ } , 1 51 (2010) . J.  Engel, T.  K.  Ga isser , T .  Stan ev a n dP.L ipari , Ph y s. Rev. D [* *46 * * ]{ }, 5013 (19 9 2 ) ; R . S.Fle t cher,T. K . Gaisser, P. Lip a ri and T. Stan ev,P h ys.  Re v . D[* *50**]{}, 5710  (1 99 4 ) ; N. N.Ka lmykov, S.S. Ostap ch e nko a nd A
 appears_that although_the authors of Ref. [@prior]_did consider_photopion_production by_secondary_nucleons, they neglected_pair production by_protons and nuclei and_photopion production by_secondary_nuclei [@gelmini].

[*Summary*]{}: We find that if ultra-high cosmic rays consist largely of heavy or_intermediate_mass nuclei,_then_the_cosmogenic photon flux will be_suppressed by about a factor_of 10_relative to that expected for proton primaries. This_provides_a means of_potentially discriminating between composition scenarios that is not subject_to the uncertainties associated with hadronic_interaction models. As_the_Pierre_Auger Observatory continues to_collect data, it is projected to_reach the sensitivity required to use_this distinction to constrain the chemical composition_of the UHECRs. This would be_complementary to the information potentially_provided by_future measurements of the cosmogenic_neutrino flux which_depends significantly_on the cosmological_evolution of UHECR sources – greater_or fewer sources_at high redshifts would lead to_a_higher or lower_neutrino_flux,_respectively [@evolution]. In_contrast, since any_observed_ultra-high energy_photons_must have originated within $\sim$100 Mpc,_cosmological_source evolution cannot affect their flux.

[*Acknowledgements:*]{} We_are grateful to Graciela_Gelmini_for clarifications of earlier_work and to Markus Risse_for helpful correspondence. DH is supported_by the_US Department_of Energy, including grant DE-FG02-95ER40896, and by NASA grant NAG5-10842. SS_acknowledges support by the EU Marie_Curie Network “UniverseNet” (HPRN-CT-2006-035863).

[99]{}

J. Abraham_[*et al.*]{}_\[Pierre_Auger Collaboration\], Phys. Rev. Lett. _[**104**]{},_091101 (2010);_arXiv:0906.2319; D. Hooper and A. M. Taylor, Astropart. Phys.  [**33**]{}, 151_(2010). J. Engel,_T. K. Gaisser, T. Stanev and P. Lipari, Phys. Rev. D [**46**]{},_5013 (1992); R. S. Fletcher, T. K. Gaisser,_P. Lipari_and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D [**50**]{}, 5710 (1994);_N. N. Kalmykov, S. S. Ostapchenko and A