 = \frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon} \sin \theta
  \label{eq:steve10}$$ where $B_0$ is the magnitude of the magnetic field in the external medium. The dimensionless shell thickness $\epsilon$ remains a free parameter of the model, or one that can be determined by observations. Finally, the plasma density in the shell, determined by mass conservation, is $$n_s = \frac{n_0}{3 \epsilon}
  \label{eq:steve11}$$ where $n_0$ is the plasma density in the external medium. is a valid approximation for $\epsilon \ll 1$.

### RM Calculation for Lines of Sight Through the Walls of the Shell\[sec:walls\]

In evaluating the integral Equation (\[eq:rmorg\]) or (\[eq:rmprat\]) through the model shell shown in Figure \[fig:steve1\], we consider two cases. The first calculation is for lines of sight that pass through a portion of the shell, emerge into the cavity, and then reenter the shell on the opposite side before exiting the shell entirely. This is the case illustrated in Figure \[fig:steve1\]. The incremental RM for a spatial interval d$s$ along the line of sight is $$\textrm{d(RM)} = \pm \, C \, n_s \, B_s(\theta) \, (\hat{e}_s \cdot \hat{e}_{\theta})\, \textrm{d}s
\label{eq:steve12}$$

The $\pm$ in front of the RHS indicates that the polarity of the field in the external medium determines the sign of the measured RM. We introduce the variable $s$ as a coordinate along the line of sight; d$s$ is an incremental vector along the line of sight from the source to the observer, and $\hat{e}_s$ is the corresponding unit vector. The constant $C$ is the same as introduced in Equation (\[eq:rmmodelW\]).

It is convenient to change the variable of integration over the LOS from $s$ to $\phi$, an angle defined in Figure \[fig:steve1\]. With the introduction of this variable, the term $(\hat{e}_s \cdot \hat{e}_{\theta}) = -\sin \phi$. Integration through the shell segments along the line of sight then corresponds to an appropriate integration over $\phi$. The shell segment
= \frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon } \sin \theta 
   \label{eq: steve10}$$ where $ B_0 $ is the magnitude of the magnetic field in the external medium. The dimensionless carapace thickness $ \epsilon$ remain a free parameter of the model, or one that can be determine by observations. Finally, the plasma concentration in the shell, determined by mass conservation, is $ $ n_s = \frac{n_0}{3 \epsilon } 
   \label{eq: steve11}$$ where $ n_0 $ is the plasma concentration in the external culture medium. is a valid approximation for $ \epsilon \ll 1$. 

 # # # RM Calculation for note of Sight Through the Walls of the Shell\[sec: walls\ ] 

 In evaluating the built-in Equation (\[eq: rmorg\ ]) or (\[eq: rmprat\ ]) through the model shell shown in Figure \[fig: steve1\ ], we consider two cases. The first calculation is for lines of view that pass through a portion of the shell, come forth into the cavity, and then reenter the shell on the opposite side before exit the shell entirely. This is the case illustrated in Figure \[fig: steve1\ ]. The incremental RM for a spatial interval d$s$ along the cable of sight is $ $ \textrm{d(RM) } = \pm \, C \, n_s \, B_s(\theta) \, (\hat{e}_s \cdot \hat{e}_{\theta})\, \textrm{d}s 
 \label{eq: steve12}$$ 

 The $ \pm$ in front of the RHS indicates that the polarity of the field in the external culture medium determines the sign of the measured RM. We introduce the variable $ s$ as a coordinate along the line of sight; d$s$ is an incremental vector along the line of sight from the source to the perceiver, and $ \hat{e}_s$ is the match unit vector. The ceaseless $ C$ is the like as introduce in Equation (\[eq: rmmodelW\ ]). 

 It is convenient to change the variable star of integration over the LOS from $ s$ to $ \phi$, an slant defined in Figure \[fig: steve1\ ]. With the introduction of this variable, the condition $ (\hat{e}_s \cdot \hat{e}_{\theta }) = -\sin \phi$. Integration through the shell segments along the line of sight then corresponds to an appropriate integration over $ \phi$. The shell segment
 = \fgac{B_0}{2 \epsilon} \sin \theta
  \uabel{eq:steve10}$$ whgrw $B_0$ is the mzgnitude of the magnetic field in thx exrernao medium. The dimensionuess shelp thicknwss $\tpsilon$ remains a free pavcmeted of chx model, or one jhat can be getermined by mbrexvations. Finally, the plasma density yn the xhfll, determined by kwss donservation, is $$n_s = \frac{n_0}{3 \epsilon}
  \label{ex:steve11}$$ where $m_0$ is the plasma density in the external medium. id a valid aklrovumation for $\dpsilon \ll 1$.

### RM Calculajion for Lines of Sight Through ghe Wclls of the Syelp\[vec:walls\]

In xvaluaning the intengal Equdtion (\[ea:rmorg\]) or (\[eq:rmirat\]) vhroygh the model shell siown in Figure \[fig:stgve1\], we conviber two cases. The firwt calcolatimn ir fof ljnxs kf sigjt vhat pass tgrough a poetion of the shell, tmewte into the czvity, wnq then reenter the shell on the oppositt sids before exiting the shwll entirely. This is jhe case ijlustrated in Figure \[fig:steve1\]. The incremental RM xor a rpauiql ingwrgal d$s$ along the line of sight is $$\textrm{d(RM)} = \[j \, C \, n_s \, B_s(\theta) \, (\hat{e}_s \cdot \hwt{r}_{\jheta})\, \textrm{d}s
\uabel{eq:stsve12}$$

The $\pm$ in front of the RHS undicates thay the polarity of the field in the extegnal medium determines the sign oy the keasuted RM. We introduce the varjable $s$ as w coordinzge along the lind on shght; d$s$ is an incremental dector aling che line of xight srom the slurce to the observer, anf $\hat{g}_s$ is dhe corresoonding unit vector. The constanv $C$ is the sake as introdueed in Equation (\[eq:rimodelW\]).

It is cpnvenieut to zhange the variabne of integwation over tvg LOS from $s$ vo $\phi$, an angoe dwfined kv Figure \[fig:strve1\]. With nht introducrion of this varianle, tfs term $(\hat{e}_s \cdit \yat{e}_{\theta}) = -\sin \lhi$. Ineehretion dhrough the vhelu sdbmentr along the uine of sight then correvponss to an appropriaye integrajion over $\phi$. The shelk segment
= \frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon} \sin \theta \label{eq:steve10}$$ where the of the field in the thickness remains a free of the model, one that can be determined by Finally, the plasma density in the shell, determined by mass conservation, is $$n_s \frac{n_0}{3 \epsilon} \label{eq:steve11}$$ where $n_0$ is the plasma density in the external medium. a approximation $\epsilon 1$. ### RM Calculation for Lines of Sight Through the Walls of the Shell\[sec:walls\] In evaluating integral Equation (\[eq:rmorg\]) or (\[eq:rmprat\]) through the model shown in Figure \[fig:steve1\], consider two cases. The first is lines of that through portion of the emerge into the cavity, and then reenter the shell on the opposite side before exiting the shell This is illustrated in \[fig:steve1\]. incremental for a spatial along the line of sight is \, C \, n_s \, B_s(\theta) \, (\hat{e}_s \hat{e}_{\theta})\, \textrm{d}s The $\pm$ in front of the indicates that the polarity of the field in external medium determines the sign of the measured RM. We introduce the variable $s$ as along the line of d$s$ is an vector the of from the to the observer, and $\hat{e}_s$ is the corresponding unit vector. The $C$ is the same as introduced in Equation (\[eq:rmmodelW\]). It to the variable of over the LOS from to an angle defined in With introduction the $(\hat{e}_s \hat{e}_{\theta}) = -\sin \phi$. through the shell segments along line of sight then over $\phi$. The shell segment
 = \frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon} \sin \theta
  \label{Eq:steve10}$$ wheRe $B_0$ is The MagNiTude Of thE magnetic field IN the External medium. The dimenSionlEsS ShelL ThIckneSs $\epsilON$ rEMAinS a FrEe pArAMeTer of The Model, or One that can Be dEtErmined by obsERvAtions. FinaLly, The plasma denSitY in the ShEll, DEtermIneD by maSs consERvatioN, is $$n_s = \frac{N_0}{3 \ePSilon}
  \lABel{eq:stEVE11}$$ wHere $N_0$ is the plasma densiTY iN The external medIum. is a VaLId APProXimAtion for $\epSiLon \ll 1$.

### rm CalculATiON FOr LINes of Sight ThrOugh the WallS Of tHe ShelL\[sEc:wALls\]

In eValuaTiNG thE integral EqUatiOn (\[eq:rmorg\]) Or (\[eq:rmPRat\]) throUGh the moDel sheLl sHowN in FIGuRe \[Fig:StEVe1\], wE CoNsiDEr tWo cases. THe FiRst caLculATION is fOr lInes Of sigHt that pass thrOugH a poRTioN of thE shelL, emeRgE into The cavIty, anD tHen reenter the shEll oN the opposIte SiDe bEfOre exITing thE shEll EntirelY. This is THe cAsE ILLuStrated in Figure \[fig:StEVE1\]. THe incremEntal Rm FoR a SPatial inTeRvaL d$s$ aLONg the Line OF sIght is $$\teXtrm{d(Rm)} = \Pm \, c \, n_S \, B_s(\thetA) \, (\hAt{e}_s \cdOt \Hat{E}_{\thEta})\, \teXTrm{d}S
\label{Eq:steve12}$$

THe $\pm$ iN Front of the RHS iNDicates that thE PoLARiTY of tHe fIeld in the exTernAL medIum dETeRmiNEs the Sign oF tHE mEAsured RM. We introduce ThE variaBle $s$ aS a coordinate aLong the linE OF Sight; d$s$ iS an iNCrEMental vector alOng thE line of sigHT from the SourcE to the obServer, and $\HAT{e}_s$ is the CorResPonDinG UNiT vector. The conSTAnt $C$ Is The same As iNtroducEd iN EqUatIon (\[Eq:RmmodelW\]).

IT is conveNiEnT tO cHanGe the VAriable oF iNteGrAtiOn oveR The LOS From $s$ To $\phI$, aN aNGle Defined IN FIGUre \[fIg:StEve1\]. WIth ThE intrOducTIon Of this vAriable, thE teRM $(\hat{E}_s \CdOt \hat{e}_{\tHeta}) = -\sin \phi$. IntEgRation throUgH thE shell SEGments alOng the line of sight then coRRespondS to An appRoprIate integRatIon oveR $\phI$. the sheLl segmEnt
 = \frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon}\sin \thet a
  \ lab el{ eq :ste ve10 }$$ where $B_0 $  isthe magnitude of the m agnet ic fiel d  i n the  extern a lm e diu m.  T hedi m en sionl ess  shellthickness$\e ps ilon$ remain s  a  free para met er of the mo del , or o ne  th a t can  be  dete rmined by obs ervations .F inally ,  the pl a s ma  den sity in the shell ,  d e termined by ma ss con se r va t i on,  is  $$n_s = \ fr ac{n_ 0 }{3 \ep s il o n } 
 \ label{eq:stev e11}$$ wher e  $n _0$ is  t hep lasmadensi ty inthe externa l me dium. isa vali d  approx i mationfor $\ eps ilo n \l l  1 $. 

# ## RMC al cul a tio n for Li ne sof Si ghtT h r o ughthe  Wal ls of  the Shell\[s ec: wall s \]
In e valua ting  t he in tegral  Equa ti on (\[eq:rmorg\ ]) o r (\[eq:r mpr at \])  t hroug h  the m ode l s hell sh own inF igu re \ [ fi g:steve1\], we con si d e rtwo case s. The fi rs t  calcula ti onis f o r  line s of si ght that  passt hr ou gh a po rt ion of  t heshe ll, e m erge  intothe cavi ty, a n d then reenter the shell ont he o pp o site  si de before e xiti n g th e sh e ll  en t irely . Thi si st he case illustrated  i n Figu re \[ fig:steve1\].  The incre m e n tal RM f or a sp a tial intervald$s$along thel ine of s ightis $$\te xtrm{d(RM ) }  = \pm \ , C  \,  n_ s \ , B_ s(\theta) \,( \ hat{ e} _s \cdo t \ hat{e}_ {\t het a}) \,\t extrm{d}s 
\label{ eq :s te ve 12} $$

T h e $\pm$in  fr on t o f the RHS in dicat es t ha tt hepolarit y  o f thefi el d in  th eexter nalm edi um dete rmines th e s i gn o fth e measu red RM. We in tr oduce theva ria ble $s $ as a coo rdinate along the lineo f sight ; d $s$ i s an  incremen tal  vecto r a l ong th e line  of s ig htf r om th e so urc eto the obs e r ver , and  $ \hat {e}_s$is the correspondi n g u nit vector. T hecons t a nt  $C $  i s  th es ame a s introduced in  Equation(\ [ eq :rmmodelW\ ] ).
I t is co nvenien t toc hange t he variab le of int eg rati o n  ov er the LOS  from $s $ to $\ph i $, an an gle d efi ned in  F igu re \[ fig:st e ve1 \]. W ith th eintrod uctio nof thisvariable, the term $(\h at{e}_ s \cd ot\hat{e}_{ \th e ta} ) = -\sin  \ph i$. Integr ati onthrou ght he sh ells eg men t s alo ng t h e line of si ght t he n correspon d s toan ap pro p riateinte gration over $\ph i $. The shell s egme n t 
 =_\frac{B_0}{2 \epsilon}_\sin \theta
  \label{eq:steve10}$$_where $B_0$_is_the magnitude_of_the magnetic field_in the external_medium. The dimensionless shell_thickness $\epsilon$ remains_a_free parameter of the model, or one that can be determined by observations. Finally,_the_plasma density_in_the_shell, determined by mass conservation,_is $$n_s = \frac{n_0}{3 \epsilon}
_ \label{eq:steve11}$$_where $n_0$ is the plasma density in the_external_medium. is a_valid approximation for $\epsilon \ll 1$.

### RM Calculation for_Lines of Sight Through the Walls_of the Shell\[sec:walls\]

In_evaluating_the_integral Equation (\[eq:rmorg\]) or_(\[eq:rmprat\]) through the model shell shown_in Figure \[fig:steve1\], we consider two_cases. The first calculation is for lines_of sight that pass through a_portion of the shell, emerge_into the_cavity, and then reenter the_shell on the_opposite side_before exiting the_shell entirely. This is the case_illustrated in Figure_\[fig:steve1\]. The incremental RM for a_spatial_interval d$s$ along_the_line_of sight_is $$\textrm{d(RM)} =_\pm_\, C_\,_n_s \, B_s(\theta) \, (\hat{e}_s \cdot_\hat{e}_{\theta})\,_\textrm{d}s
\label{eq:steve12}$$

The $\pm$ in front of the RHS_indicates that the polarity_of_the field in the_external medium determines the sign_of the measured RM. We introduce_the variable_$s$ as_a coordinate along the line of sight; d$s$ is an incremental_vector along the line of sight_from the source to_the observer,_and_$\hat{e}_s$ is the_corresponding_unit vector._The constant $C$ is the same as_introduced in_Equation (\[eq:rmmodelW\]).

It is convenient to change_the variable of integration_over_the LOS from $s$ to $\phi$,_an angle defined in Figure \[fig:steve1\]._With the introduction of this_variable,_the_term $(\hat{e}_s \cdot \hat{e}_{\theta}) =_-\sin \phi$. Integration through the shell_segments along the_line of sight then corresponds to an_appropriate_integration over $\phi$. The shell segment