 cloud events. That is, based on their $HR$ light curves, the majority of all other monitored type IIs display no strong evidence (sustained trends in $HR$ more than $50$ per cent above the mean value) for variations in $N_{\rm
  H}$, although several were individually monitored for several years or more in some cases. In $\S$5.6, we will focus on the nine type II objects that have sustained monitoring for $\geq$0.6 yr. We will show that seven of them lack long-term ($>$1 d) variations in $N_{\rm H}$ down to $\Delta$$N_{\rm H} \sim 1-9 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ depending on the signal-to-noise ratio and discuss the applicability of clumpy-absorber models to these objects.

In the case of Cen A, in addition to the two eclipses identified, we present in Appendix A evidence (at $\sim$2.2$\sigma$ confidence) that the baseline level of $N_{\rm H}$ dipped by $\sim14$ per cent and then recovered during the first three months of 2010. The reader should bear in mind, however, that Cen A is a radio galaxy and no BLR has been detected, so it may not be representative of all Seyferts, most of which are radio quiet. This observation and its implications are discussed in $\S$5.6.1.

We caution that “peak $N_{\rm H}$”refers only to what we have measured with time-resolved spectroscopy. Since clouds are not point sources, we can only probe that two-dimensional slice of the cloud that transits the line of sight, and there may exist other lines of sight outside that slice which intersect parts of the cloud with higher columns. Consequently, the intrinsic maximum column density of the cloud could be greater than what we measure if *RXTE* was not monitoring the source when that part of the cloud transited the line of sight.

The durations we measure also refer only to that slice of the cloud intersected by the line of sight. In the case of a spherically-symmetric cloud, observed eclipse durations will be, on average, $\pi/4$=0.79 times the maximum durations that could have been observed. (Consequently, average inferred cloud diameters, estimated in $\S$\[sec:diams\],
cloud events. That is, based on their $ HR$ light curves, the majority of all early monitored character two display no strong evidence (nourish course in $ HR$ more than $ 50 $ per cent above the mean value) for variation in $ N_{\rm 
   H}$, although several were individually monitored for respective days or more in some cases. In $ \S$5.6, we will concenter on the nine type II objects that have sustain monitoring for $ \geq$0.6   year. We will show that seven of them lack retentive - term ($ > $ 1   d) variations in $ N_{\rm H}$ down to $ \Delta$$N_{\rm hydrogen } \sim 1 - 9 \times 10^{22}$   cm$^{-2}$ depending on the signal - to - noise ratio and hash out the applicability of clumpy - absorber models to these objects. 

 In the case of Cen   A, in addition to the two eclipse identified, we give in Appendix   A evidence (at $ \sim$2.2$\sigma$ confidence) that the baseline level of $ N_{\rm H}$ dipped by $ \sim14 $ per penny and then recovered during the first three months of 2010. The reader should bear in mind, however, that Cen   A is a radio receiver galax and no BLR has been detect, so it may not be representative of all Seyferts, most of which are radio quiet. This observation and its implications are discussed in $ \S$5.6.1. 

 We caution that “ peak $ N_{\rm H}$”refers only to what we have measure with clock time - resolved spectroscopy. Since clouds are not distributor point sources, we can only probe that two - dimensional slice of the cloud that transit the line of sight, and there may exist other lines of view outside that slice which intersect parts of the cloud with higher columns. Consequently, the intrinsic maximum column concentration of the cloud could be greater than what we measure if * RXTE * was not monitoring the source when that part of the cloud transit the line of sight. 

 The durations we measure also denote only to that slice of the cloud intersect by the line of batch. In the case of a spherically - symmetric swarm, observed eclipse durations will be, on average, $ \pi/4$=0.79 times the maximum duration that could have been observed. (Consequently, modal inferred swarm diameters, estimated in $ \S$\[sec: diams\ ],
 cllud events. That is, based on their $HR$ liyyt curtes, the majorith of all other monitored typx IIw diskjay no strong eviddnce (sustwined trwnds un $HR$ more than $50$ pcx cenf abore the mean valug) for variathons in $N_{\rm
  H}$, autkough several were individually monieored fpr several years or kjre jn some cases. In $\S$5.6, we will focus oh the npne type II objecys that have sustained monltorlng for $\geq$0.6 yr. We wlll show thqt sqcen of them uack long-ttrk ($>$1 d) variatjons in $N_{\rm H}$ down to $\Delta$$N_{\rm F} \sim 1-9 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ dwpejging on the signwl-to-noise rabpo and giscuss the applicabikitb of clumpy-absorber modelv to these objects.

Yn the cave of Cen A, in addituob to jhe tfo ezoipres ivenfified, we present ih Appendix A evidence (at $\sim$2.2$\sigka$ bpnfidence) thzt the bwseline level of $N_{\rm H}$ dipped by $\sim14$ peg ceht and then recovered dyring the first three months os 2010. The reader should bear in mind, however, that Cet A is x rceio gxoady and no BLR has been detected, so it may not ge rvpresentative of cll Seyferts, mosy lf rhich are radko quizf. Fhis observation ajd its ymplixations awe doscussed in $\S$5.6.1.

We caution thar “peak $N_{\rm H}$”gefees only to what we have measuxed wijh timr-resolved spectroscopy. Rincs clouds arf not poihg sources, we can onky probe that two-dimensional slice of the cloud ghat transyts the lije of sight, and there maj exidt other linfs of sight outside that slice xiich intersecj pdrtv of the clouc with higher columns. Conseauently, the kntrinsic jaximum column denfity of the cnlud could be greater thab whqt we mdxsure if *RXTE* eas not monitoring rhe source when thet pxdt of the cloud trqnsited the linr ow sygjt.

Vhe dtsations we maasufe xkso rdfer only ti thay slice of the cloud intsrsected by the lime of sighj. In the sase of a sphrrically-symmetric floud, obrervec eslipse durations will be, on avsrage, $\pi/4$=0.79 himcs the maximui duvatijns that cpuld have been observed. (Consequently, avxrage inferred cloud diqmeters, estimated iu $\X$\[sec:diams\],
cloud events. That is, based on their curves, majority of other monitored type (sustained in $HR$ more $50$ per cent the mean value) for variations in H}$, although several were individually monitored for several years or more in some In $\S$5.6, we will focus on the nine type II objects that have monitoring $\geq$0.6 We show that seven of them lack long-term ($>$1 d) variations in $N_{\rm H}$ down to $\Delta$$N_{\rm \sim 1-9 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ depending on the ratio and discuss the of clumpy-absorber models to these In case of A, addition the two eclipses we present in Appendix A evidence (at $\sim$2.2$\sigma$ confidence) that the baseline level of $N_{\rm H}$ dipped $\sim14$ per then recovered the three of 2010. The bear in mind, however, that Cen radio galaxy and no BLR has been detected, it may be representative of all Seyferts, most which are radio quiet. This observation and its are discussed in $\S$5.6.1. We caution that “peak $N_{\rm H}$”refers only to what we have time-resolved spectroscopy. Since clouds not point sources, can probe two-dimensional of the that transits the line of sight, and there may exist other of sight outside that slice which intersect parts of the higher Consequently, the intrinsic column density of the could greater than what we *RXTE* not when part the cloud transited the of sight. The durations we also refer only to intersected by the line of sight. In the of a spherically-symmetric cloud, observed eclipse durations be, on average, $\pi/4$=0.79 times the maximum durations that could have been (Consequently, average diameters, estimated in $\S$\[sec:diams\],
 cloud events. That is, based on tHeir $HR$ lighT curvEs, tHe mAjOritY of aLl other monitorED typE IIs display no strong eviDence (SuSTainED tRends In $HR$ morE ThAN $50$ Per CeNt AboVe THe Mean vAluE) for varIations in $N_{\Rm
  H}$, AlThough severaL WeRe individuAllY monitored foR seVeral yEaRs oR More iN soMe casEs. In $\S$5.6, wE Will foCus on the nInE Type II OBjects tHAT hAve sUstained monitorinG FoR $\Geq$0.6 yr. We will shoW that sEvEN oF THem LacK long-term ($>$1 d) VaRiatiONs in $N_{\rm h}$ DoWN TO $\DeLTa$$N_{\rm H} \sim 1-9 \timeS 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ dependinG On tHe signAl-To-nOIse ratIo and DiSCusS the applicaBiliTy of clumpY-absorBEr modelS To these ObjectS.

In The Case OF CEn a, in AdDItiON tO thE Two Eclipses IdEnTifieD, we pRESENt in appEndiX A eviDence (at $\sim$2.2$\sigMa$ cOnfiDEncE) that The baSeliNe Level Of $N_{\rm H}$ DippeD bY $\sim14$ per cent and tHen rEcovered dUriNg The FiRst thREe montHs oF 2010. ThE reader Should bEAr iN mIND, HoWever, that Cen A is a raDiO GAlAxy and no bLR has BEeN dETected, so It May Not bE REpresEntaTIvE of all SeYferts, MOsT oF which aRe Radio qUiEt. THis ObserVAtioN and itS implicaTions ARe discussed in $\S$5.6.1.

wE caution that “pEAk $n_{\RM H}$”REferS onLy to what we hAve mEAsurEd wiTH tIme-REsolvEd speCtROsCOpy. Since clouds are noT pOint soUrces, We can only probE that two-diMENSional slIce oF ThE Cloud that transIts thE line of sigHT, and therE may eXist otheR lines of sIGHt outsidE thAt sLicE whICH iNtersect parts OF The cLoUd with hIghEr columNs. COnsEquEntLy, The intrinSic maximUm CoLuMn DenSity oF The cloud CoUld Be GreAter tHAn what We meaSure If *rXte* waS not monIToRINg thE sOuRce wHen ThAt parT of tHE clOud tranSited the lIne OF sigHt.

thE duratiOns we measure aLsO refer only To ThaT slice OF The cloud Intersected by the line of sIGht. In thE caSe of a SpheRically-syMmeTric clOud, OBserveD eclipSe durAtIonS WIll be, ON AvEraGe, $\Pi/4$=0.79 times the MAXimUm durAtIons That couLd have been observed. (cOnsEquently, averaGe iNferRED cLouD DiAMetErS, EstIMAted in $\S$\[sec:diams\],
 cloud events. That is, ba sed on the ir $H R$lig ht  cur ves,  the majorityo f al l other monitored type  IIsdi s play no  stro ng evid e nc e (su st ai ned  t r en ds in  $H R$ more  than $50$  pe rcent above t h emean value ) f or variation s i n $N_{ \r m
H}$,alt hough  sever a l were  individu al l y moni t ored fo r se vera l years or more i n  s o me cases. In $ \S$5.6 ,w ew i llfoc us on theni ne ty p e II ob j ec t s tha t  have sustain ed monitori n g f or $\g eq $0. 6  yr. W e wil ls how  that seven  ofthem lack  long- t erm ($> $ 1 d) va riatio nsin$N_{ \ rm  H }$do w n t o  $ \De l ta$ $N_{\rmH}  \ sim 1 -9 \ t i m e s 10 ^{2 2}$cm$^{ -2}$ dependin g o n th e  si gnal- to-no isera tio a nd dis cussth e applicability  ofclumpy-ab sor be r m od els t o  these  ob jec ts.

In  the ca s e o fC e n  A , in addition to t he t wo  eclipse s iden t if ie d , we pre se ntin A p p endix  A e v id ence (at  $\sim $ 2. 2$ \sigma$  c onfide nc e)tha t the base line l evel of$N_{\ r m H}$ dipped b y  $\sim14$ per ce n t  a n d th enrecovered d urin g  the  fir s tthr e e mon ths o f2 01 0 . The reader should  b ear in  mind , however, th at Cen A i s a  radio g alax y  a n d no BLR has b een d etected, s o  it maynot b e repres entativeo f  all Sey fer ts,  mo sto f  w hich are radi o quie t.  This o bse rvation  an d i tsimp li cations a re discu ss ed  i n$\S $5.6. 1 .

We ca ut ion  t hat  “pea k  $N_{\ rm H} $”re fe rs onl y to wh a tw e  hav eme asur edwi th ti me-r e sol ved spe ctroscopy . S i ncecl ou ds arenot point sou rc es, we can  o nly  probe t hat two- dimensional slice of th e  cloudtha t tra nsit s the lin e o f sigh t,a nd the re may  exis toth e r  line s of  si gh t outsidet h atslice  w hich  inters ect parts of the c l oud  with highercol umns . Co nse q ue n tly ,t hei n trinsic maximum  column de ns i ty  of the cl o udco uld begreater  than what we  measureif *RXTE*  w as n o t  mo nitoring t he sourc e when th a t par t  o f the  cl oud tr an sit ed th e line ofsight .

The  d uratio ns we  m easure a lso refer only to thatsliceof th e c loud inte rse c ted  by the l ineof sight.Inthe  case  of a sph eric a ll y-s y mmetr ic c l oud, obse r ve d e c l ip se duration s w ill  be,ona verage , $\ pi/4$=0.79 timest he maximum dur atio n s  th atc ould  h ave been obser ved .( C onsequen tl y, averageinferred  c l oud d iamete rs, es timated i n$ \S$\[s ec:d iam s\],
 cloud_events. That_is, based on their_$HR$ light_curves,_the majority_of_all other monitored_type IIs display_no strong evidence (sustained_trends in $HR$_more_than $50$ per cent above the mean value) for variations in $N_{\rm
  H}$,_although_several were_individually_monitored_for several years or more_in some cases. In $\S$5.6,_we will_focus on the nine type II objects that_have_sustained monitoring for_$\geq$0.6 yr. We will show that seven of them lack_long-term ($>$1 d) variations in $N_{\rm H}$_down to $\Delta$$N_{\rm_H}_\sim_1-9 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ depending_on the signal-to-noise ratio and discuss_the applicability of clumpy-absorber models to_these objects.

In the case of Cen A, in_addition to the two eclipses identified,_we present in Appendix A evidence_(at $\sim$2.2$\sigma$_confidence) that the baseline level_of $N_{\rm H}$_dipped by_$\sim14$ per cent_and then recovered during the first_three months of_2010. The reader should bear in_mind,_however, that Cen A_is_a_radio galaxy_and no BLR_has_been detected,_so_it may not be representative of_all_Seyferts, most of which are radio quiet._This observation and its_implications_are discussed in $\S$5.6.1.

We_caution that “peak $N_{\rm H}$”refers_only to what we have measured_with time-resolved_spectroscopy. Since_clouds are not point sources, we can only probe that two-dimensional_slice of the cloud that transits_the line of sight,_and there_may_exist other lines_of_sight outside_that slice which intersect parts of the_cloud with_higher columns. Consequently, the intrinsic maximum_column density of the_cloud_could be greater than what we_measure if *RXTE* was not monitoring_the source when that part_of_the_cloud transited the line of_sight.

The durations we measure also refer_only to that_slice of the cloud intersected by the_line_of sight. In the case of_a_spherically-symmetric cloud, observed eclipse durations will_be,_on_average, $\pi/4$=0.79 times the maximum_durations that could have been observed._(Consequently, average inferred cloud diameters, estimated in $\S$\[sec:diams\],