{K}_1\doteq
L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\theta_1}{2\pi})$ is defined by $$\label{FloquetGenEq}
U_{\mathrm{F}}=\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ where $u_1(\theta_1)=U_{(\theta_1,0)}(T_2,0)$ ($\doteq$ monodromy operator) and $(\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}\phi)(\theta_1)=\phi(\theta_1-\omega_1T_2)$.

Let $A:{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A\subset\mathcal{H}\rightarrow\mathcal{H}$ be an unbounded positive self-adjoint operator with discrete spectrum which we call a [*probe operator*]{}. Assuming that if $\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$, then $U(t,0)\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$ for all $t\geq0$, a very interesting question is about the behavior of the expectation value of $A$, that is, $$E_{\psi}^{A}(t)\equiv\langle
U(t,0)\psi,AU(t,0)\psi\rangle.$$ We say the system is $A$-dynamically stable if $E_{\psi}^{A}(t)$ is a bounded function of time, and $A$-dynamically unstable otherwise. A particular case is when the Hamiltonian has the form $H(t)=H_0+V(t)$ and $A=H_0$. In this work we discuss some simple conditions assuring dynamical stability, mainly when either the Floquet or quasienergy operator has purely point spectrum; recall that in the periodic case it is known that continuous spectrum of the Floquet operator implies dynamical instability (see Section \[PreliminarSection\]).

Usually it is not a simple task to get results on dynamical (in)stability in the original Hilbert space $H$ through properties of $K$ or $\tilde{K}$ acting in the corresponding enlarged space. We present some theoretical results about this point in Section \[BoundedSection\]. An important result in the periodic case was proved in [@DSSV], i.e., that the applicability of the KAM method for the quasienergy operator $K$, which is a technique to find out a unitary operator $U$ such that $UKU
{ K}_1\doteq 
 L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\theta_1}{2\pi})$ is defined by $ $ \label{FloquetGenEq } 
 U_{\mathrm{F}}=\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ where $ u_1(\theta_1)=U_{(\theta_1,0)}(T_2,0)$ ($ \doteq$ monodromy operator) and $ (\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}\phi)(\theta_1)=\phi(\theta_1-\omega_1T_2)$. 

 Let $ A:{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A\subset\mathcal{H}\rightarrow\mathcal{H}$ be an unbounded incontrovertible self - adjoint hustler with discrete spectrum which we call a [ * probe operator * ] { }. assume that if $ \psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$, then $ U(t,0)\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$ for all $ t\geq0 $, a very interesting motion is about the behavior of the expectation value of $ A$, that is, $ $ E_{\psi}^{A}(t)\equiv\langle 
 U(t,0)\psi, AU(t,0)\psi\rangle.$$ We read the organization is $ A$ -dynamically stable if $ E_{\psi}^{A}(t)$ is a bounded affair of time, and $ A$ -dynamically unstable differently. A particular case is when the Hamiltonian has the form $ H(t)=H_0+V(t)$ and $ adenine = H_0$. In this work we discourse some simple conditions guarantee dynamical stability, mainly when either the Floquet or quasienergy hustler has purely point spectrum; remember that in the periodic case it is know that continuous spectrum of the Floquet operator implies dynamical instability (see Section   \[PreliminarSection\ ]). 

 normally it is not a simple task to get results on dynamical (in)stability in the original Hilbert space $ H$ through property of $ K$ or $ \tilde{K}$ act in the corresponding enlarged space. We present some theoretical results about this point in Section   \[BoundedSection\ ]. An important consequence in the periodic case was proved in   [ @DSSV ], i.e., that the applicability of the KAM method acting for the quasienergy hustler $ K$, which is a technique to find out a unitary operator $ U$ such that $ UKU
{K}_1\doheq
L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\theta_1}{2\pl})$ is defined by $$\label{FlmquetGsnEq}
U_{\matfrm{F}}=\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ where $u_1(\theta_1)=U_{(\vhetq_1,0)}(T_2,0)$ ($\douvq$ monodromy operator) and $(\mathbal{T}_{-T_2}\phi)(\tyeta_1)=\khi(\theta_1-\omega_1T_2)$.

Let $A:{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A\sugdet\mctical{H}\rightarrow\kathcal{H}$ ba an unbounded pusntive self-adjoint operator with discwete sprchrum which we sall w [*prkbe operator*]{}. Assuming that if $\psi\ih{{\mathrm{vom}~}}A$, then $U(t,0)\psi\on{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$ for all $t\geq0$, w vegy interesting quedtion is abiut eye behavior uf the exptccation valug of $A$, that is, $$E_{\psi}^{A}(t)\equiv\langle
J(t,0)\psi,CU(t,0)\psi\ranglg.$$ Se vay the sysvem is $A$-dynamicalln stabla if $E_{\pxi}^{A}(t)$ is a bounced fubction of time, and $A$-dbnamically unstable jtherwise. A particular case us when the Hamkotoviah ias the flrm $H(t)=H_0+V(t)$ and $A=H_0$. In this work we discuss soke wimple conditjons afstring dynamical stability, mainly when epthed the Floquet or quasiebergy operator has putely point spectrum; recall that in the periodic case it is nnown ghau gjvrijuous spectrum of the Floquet operator implief dunsmical instabijity (see Sevtlom \[KreliminarSectkon\]).

Usucmlg it is not a simppe task to gwt resultf on dynamical (in)stability in tye original Kilvert space $H$ throuyh propertier of $K$ or $\tilde{K}$ acting in the curreaponding enparged spzze. We present sooe nheosetical results about this point in Seccion \[BounaedSgction\]. Wn importajt result in the periodif casg was [roved in [@DDSV], i.e., that the applicability oh the KAM metnog fmr the qbasiencrgy operator $K$, which is a teehnique co fina out a unptary opecator $U$ such that $UKU
{K}_1\doteq L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\theta_1}{2\pi})$ is defined by $$\label{FloquetGenEq} U_{\mathrm{F}}=\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ ($\doteq$ operator) and Let $A:{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A\subset\mathcal{H}\rightarrow\mathcal{H}$ be with spectrum which we a [*probe operator*]{}. that if $\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$, then $U(t,0)\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$ for $t\geq0$, a very interesting question is about the behavior of the expectation value $A$, that is, $$E_{\psi}^{A}(t)\equiv\langle U(t,0)\psi,AU(t,0)\psi\rangle.$$ We say the system is $A$-dynamically stable if is bounded of and $A$-dynamically unstable otherwise. A particular case is when the Hamiltonian has the form $H(t)=H_0+V(t)$ and In this work we discuss some simple conditions dynamical stability, mainly when the Floquet or quasienergy operator purely spectrum; recall in periodic it is known continuous spectrum of the Floquet operator implies dynamical instability (see Section \[PreliminarSection\]). Usually it is not a task to on dynamical in original space $H$ through $K$ or $\tilde{K}$ acting in the We present some theoretical results about this point Section \[BoundedSection\]. important result in the periodic case proved in [@DSSV], i.e., that the applicability of KAM method for the quasienergy operator $K$, which is a technique to find out a $U$ such that $UKU
{K}_1\doteq
L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\thetA_1}{2\pi})$ is definEd by $$\lAbeL{FlOqUetGEnEq}
u_{\mathrm{F}}=\mathcaL{t}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ wHere $u_1(\theta_1)=U_{(\theta_1,0)}(T_2,0)$ ($\doteq$ MonodRoMY opeRAtOr) and $(\Mathcal{t}_{-t_2}\pHI)(\TheTa_1)=\PhI(\thEtA_1-\OmEga_1T_2)$.

LEt $A:{{\Mathrm{dOm}~}}A\subset\mAthCaL{H}\rightarrow\MAtHcal{H}$ be an uNboUnded positivE seLf-adjoInT opERator WitH discRete spECtrum wHich we calL a [*PRobe opERator*]{}. AsSUMiNg thAt if $\psi\in{{\mathrm{doM}~}}a$, tHEn $U(t,0)\psi\in{{\mathrM{dom}~}}A$ fOr ALl $T\GEq0$, a VerY interestiNg QuestIOn is aboUT tHE BEhaVIor of the expecTation value OF $A$, tHat is, $$E_{\PsI}^{A}(t)\EQuiv\laNgle
U(T,0)\pSI,AU(T,0)\psi\rangle.$$ WE say The system Is $A$-dynAMically STable if $e_{\psi}^{A}(t)$ Is a BouNded FUnCtIon Of TIme, ANd $a$-dyNAmiCally unsTaBlE otheRwisE. a PARticUlaR casE is whEn the HamiltonIan Has tHE foRm $H(t)=H_0+v(t)$ and $a=H_0$. In ThIs worK we disCuss sOmE simple conditioNs asSuring dynAmiCaL stAbIlity, MAinly wHen EitHer the FLoquet oR QuaSiENERgY operator has purely PoINT sPectrum; rEcall tHAt In THe periodIc CasE it iS KNown tHat cONtInuous spEctrum OF tHe floquet OpErator ImPliEs dYnamiCAl inStabilIty (see SeCtion \[pReliminarSectiON\]).

Usually it is nOT a SIMpLE tasK to Get results oN dynAMicaL (in)sTAbIliTY in thE origInAL HILbert space $H$ through pRoPertieS of $K$ oR $\tilde{K}$ acting In the correSPONding enlArgeD SpACe. We present somE theoRetical resULts about This pOint in SeCtion \[BounDEDSection\]. an iMpoRtaNt rESUlT in the periodiC CAse wAs Proved iN [@DSsV], i.e., thaT thE apPliCabIlIty of the KaM method FoR tHe QuAsiEnergY Operator $k$, wHicH iS a tEchniQUe to fiNd out A uniTaRy OPerAtor $U$ suCH tHAT $UKU
{K}_1\doteq
L^2(S^1,\mathc al{H},\fra c{d\t het a_1 }{ 2\pi })$is defined by$ $\la bel{FloquetGenEq}
U_{\ mathr m{ F }}=\ m at hcal{ T}_{-T_ 2 }u _ 1 ,$$  w he re$u _ 1( \thet a_1 )=U_{(\ theta_1,0) }(T _2 ,0)$ ($\dote q $monodromyope rator) and $ (\m athcal {T }_{ - T_2}\ phi )(\th eta_1) = \phi(\ theta_1-\ om e ga_1T_ 2 )$.

Le t $A :{{\ mathrm{dom}~}}A\s u bs e t\mathcal{H}\r ightar ro w \m a t hca l{H }$ be an u nb ounde d  positi v es e l f-a d joint operato r with disc r ete  spect ru m w h ich we  call  a [*p robe operat or*] {}. Assum ing th a t if $\ p si\in{{ \mathr m{d om} ~}}A $ ,th en$U ( t,0 ) \p si\ i n{{ \mathrm{ do m} ~}}A$  for a l l  $t\ geq 0$,a ver y interesting  qu esti o n i s abo ut th e be ha viorof the  expe ct ation value of$A$,  that is,  $$ E_ {\p si }^{A} ( t)\equ iv\ lan gle
U(t ,0)\psi , AU( t, 0 ) \ ps i\rangle.$$ We say  t h e  s ystem is  $A$-d y na mi c ally sta bl e i f $E _ { \psi} ^{A} ( t) $ is a b ounded fu nc tion of  t ime, a nd  $A $-d ynami c ally  unsta ble othe rwise .  A particularc ase is when t h eH a mi l toni anhas the for m $H ( t)=H _0+V ( t) $ a n d $A= H_0$.  I n  t h is work we discussso me sim ple c onditions ass uring dyna m i c al stabi lity ,  m a inly when eith er th e Floqueto r quasie nergy  operato r has pur e l y pointspe ctr um;  re c a ll  that in thep e riod ic  case i t i s known  th atcon tin uo us spectr um of th eFl oq ue t o perat o r implie sdyn am ica l ins t abilit y (se e Se ct io n  \[ Prelimi n ar S e ctio n\ ]) .

U sua ll y itis n o t a  simple  task toget resu lt son dyna mical (in)sta bi lity in th eori ginalH i lbert sp ace $H$ through propert i es of $ K$or $\ tild e{K}$ act ing  in th e c o rrespo ndingenlar ge d s p a ce. W e pr ese nt  some theo r e tic al re su ltsabout t his point in Secti o n \ [BoundedSecti on\ ]. A n im por t an t  re su l t i n the periodic ca se was pro ve d  i n [@DSSV], i.e .,  that t he appl icabi l ity ofthe KAM m ethod for  t he q u a sie nergy oper ator $K$ , which i s  a te c hn iquetofind o ut  aunita ry ope r ato r $U$  suchth at $UK U
{K}_1\doteq
L^2(S^1,\mathcal{H},\frac{d\theta_1}{2\pi})$ is_defined by_$$\label{FloquetGenEq}
U_{\mathrm{F}}=\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}u_1,$$ where $u_1(\theta_1)=U_{(\theta_1,0)}(T_2,0)$ ($\doteq$_monodromy operator)_and_$(\mathcal{T}_{-T_2}\phi)(\theta_1)=\phi(\theta_1-\omega_1T_2)$.

Let $A:{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A\subset\mathcal{H}\rightarrow\mathcal{H}$_be_an unbounded positive_self-adjoint operator with_discrete spectrum which we_call a [*probe_operator*]{}._Assuming that if $\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$, then $U(t,0)\psi\in{{\mathrm{dom}~}}A$ for all $t\geq0$, a very interesting question is_about_the behavior_of_the_expectation value of $A$, that_is, $$E_{\psi}^{A}(t)\equiv\langle
U(t,0)\psi,AU(t,0)\psi\rangle.$$ We say the_system is_$A$-dynamically stable if $E_{\psi}^{A}(t)$ is a bounded function_of_time, and $A$-dynamically_unstable otherwise. A particular case is when the Hamiltonian_has the form $H(t)=H_0+V(t)$ and $A=H_0$._In this work_we_discuss_some simple conditions assuring_dynamical stability, mainly when either the_Floquet or quasienergy operator has purely_point spectrum; recall that in the periodic_case it is known that continuous_spectrum of the Floquet operator_implies dynamical_instability (see Section \[PreliminarSection\]).

Usually it is_not a simple_task to_get results on_dynamical (in)stability in the original Hilbert_space $H$ through_properties of $K$ or $\tilde{K}$ acting_in_the corresponding enlarged_space._We_present some_theoretical results about_this_point in_Section \[BoundedSection\]._An important result in the periodic_case_was proved in [@DSSV], i.e., that the applicability_of the KAM method_for_the quasienergy operator $K$,_which is a technique to_find out a unitary operator $U$_such that_$UKU