. At the boundary $\delta \Sigma$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
 q_{\phi r}&=0, \\
 \sqrt{q}&=r^{3/2} \sqrt{r+r_s} \sin\theta, \\
 N_\phi &= -\frac{2J \sin^2\theta}{r} ~~ \rightarrow ~~ N^\phi=-\frac{2J}{r^3}, \\
 K_{\phi r}&=\frac{3 J \sin^2 \theta}{\sqrt{r^3 (r-r_s)+4J^2 \sin^2 \theta}}, \\
 K&=0.\end{aligned}$$ Performing the integral, the leading term in the expansion in $1/r$ is $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P} = \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{9\pi}{64 G} \frac{J^2}{r}=0.\label{6.9}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in Ashtekar-Barbero variables, the diffeomorphism constraint of the full theory takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{16\pi G}D(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma N^a\left(E^b_i\partial_aA^i_b-\partial_b(E^b_iA^i_a)
\right).\end{aligned}$$ Its boundary term (for asymptotically flat spacetimes) takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P}= \frac{1}{8\pi G\beta} \oint_{\delta\Sigma} N^a E^b_i ~ A_a^i ~ \mathrm{d}S_b.\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, in our reduced theory, the reduced diffeomorphism constraint is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{8\pi G}d(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{4\pi G\beta}\int_\sigma N^a\left(\e^b_i\partial_a\a^i_b-\partial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_a^\phi\delta^i_3\varepsilon_{ijk}\a^j_b\e^b_k
\right),\
. At the boundary $ \delta \Sigma$, we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  q_{\phi r}&=0, \\ 
  \sqrt{q}&=r^{3/2 } \sqrt{r+r_s } \sin\theta, \\ 
  N_\phi & = -\frac{2J \sin^2\theta}{r } ~~ \rightarrow ~~ N^\phi=-\frac{2J}{r^3 }, \\ 
  K_{\phi r}&=\frac{3 J \sin^2 \theta}{\sqrt{r^3 (r - r_s)+4J^2 \sin^2 \theta } }, \\ 
  K&=0.\end{aligned}$$ Performing the integral, the leading condition in the expansion in $ 1 / r$ is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \cal phosphorus } = \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{9\pi}{64 G } \frac{J^2}{r}=0.\label{6.9}\end{aligned}$$ 

 Now, in Ashtekar - Barbero variables, the diffeomorphism restraint of the full hypothesis takes the form $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{1}{16\pi G}D(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma N^a\left(E^b_i\partial_aA^i_b-\partial_b(E^b_iA^i_a) 
 \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its boundary terminus (for asymptotically bland spacetimes) takes the kind $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \cal P}= \frac{1}{8\pi G\beta } \oint_{\delta\Sigma } N^a E^b_i ~ A_a^i ~ \mathrm{d}S_b.\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, in our abridge theory, the decreased diffeomorphism constraint is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{1}{8\pi G}d(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{4\pi G\beta}\int_\sigma N^a\left(\e^b_i\partial_a\a^i_b-\partial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_a^\phi\delta^i_3\varepsilon_{ijk}\a^j_b\e^b_k 
 \right),\
. At the boundary $\delta \Sigmx$, we have $$\begin{coigned}
 q_{\phi d}&=0, \\
 \sqrt{q}&=f^{3/2} \sqrt{r+r_s} \sin\theta, \\
 N_\phi &= -\frec{2J \win^2\thtna}{r} ~~ \rightarrow ~~ N^\phi=-\wrac{2J}{r^3}, \\
 K_{\ihi r}&=\frac{3 J \smn^2 \theta}{\sqrt{r^3 (r-r_s)+4J^2 \sin^2 \tmzta}}, \\
 I&=0.\cnd{alngied}$$ Performing jhe integral, the leading taro nn the expansion in $1/r$ is $$\begin{aligneq}
{\cal P} = \llm_{r\to\infty}\frac{9\ki}{64 G} \gwac{J^2}{d}=0.\label{6.9}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in Ashtekar-Bargero vagiables, the diffepmorphism constraint of thf fupl theory takes thf form $$\begib{alidbed}
\frac{1}{16\pi G}D(\xec N)&=\frac{1}{8\pp G\beta}\int_\Sjgma N^a\left(E^b_i\partial_aA^i_b-\partiau_b(E^b_iC^i_a)
\right).\end{qlugnfg}$$ Its boundery tegm (for asymptotically flat slacetimes) takex tie firm $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P}= \frac{1}{8\pi G\beta} \oint_{\qelta\Sigmd} U^a E^b_i ~ A_a^i ~ \mathrm{d}S_v.\ebd{alicned}$$ On gye uthtr ians, in okr ceduced thekry, the redyced diffeomorphism cjbstraint is gjven br $$\fegin{aligned}
\frac{1}{8\pi G}d(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{4\pi G\beta}\itt_\sjgma N^a\left(\e^b_i\partial_a\a^u_b-\partial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_w^\phi\delta^y_3\varepsilon_{ijk}\a^j_b\e^b_k
\right),\
. At the boundary $\delta \Sigma$, we q_{\phi \\ \sqrt{q}&=r^{3/2} \sin\theta, \\ N_\phi ~~ \\ K_{\phi r}&=\frac{3 \sin^2 \theta}{\sqrt{r^3 (r-r_s)+4J^2 \theta}}, \\ K&=0.\end{aligned}$$ Performing the integral, leading term in the expansion in $1/r$ is $$\begin{aligned} {\cal P} = \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{9\pi}{64 \frac{J^2}{r}=0.\label{6.9}\end{aligned}$$ Now, in Ashtekar-Barbero variables, the diffeomorphism constraint of the full theory takes form \frac{1}{16\pi N)&=\frac{1}{8\pi N^a\left(E^b_i\partial_aA^i_b-\partial_b(E^b_iA^i_a) \right).\end{aligned}$$ Its boundary term (for asymptotically flat spacetimes) takes the form $$\begin{aligned} {\cal P}= \frac{1}{8\pi \oint_{\delta\Sigma} N^a E^b_i ~ A_a^i ~ \mathrm{d}S_b.\end{aligned}$$ On other hand, in our theory, the reduced diffeomorphism constraint given $$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{8\pi N)&=\frac{1}{4\pi N^a\left(\e^b_i\partial_a\a^i_b-\partial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_a^\phi\delta^i_3\varepsilon_{ijk}\a^j_b\e^b_k
. At the boundary $\delta \Sigma$, we Have $$\begin{aLigneD}
 q_{\pHi r}&=0, \\
 \SqRt{q}&=r^{3/2} \Sqrt{R+r_s} \sin\theta, \\
 N_\phI &= -\Frac{2j \sin^2\theta}{r} ~~ \rightarrow ~~ N^\pHi=-\fraC{2J}{R^3}, \\
 k_{\phi R}&=\FrAc{3 J \siN^2 \theta}{\sQRt{R^3 (R-R_s)+4J^2 \SiN^2 \tHetA}}, \\
 K&=0.\ENd{AlignEd}$$ PErformiNg the integRal, ThE leading term IN tHe expansioN in $1/R$ is $$\begin{aligNed}
{\Cal P} = \liM_{r\To\iNFty}\frAc{9\pI}{64 G} \fraC{J^2}{r}=0.\labEL{6.9}\end{alIgned}$$

Now, iN ASHtekar-bArbero vARIaBles, The diffeomorphism COnSTraint of the fulL theorY tAKeS THe fOrm $$\Begin{alignEd}
\Frac{1}{16\pI g}D(\vec N)&=\fRAc{1}{8\PI g\BetA}\Int_\Sigma N^a\lefT(E^b_i\partial_Aa^i_b-\PartiaL_b(e^b_ia^I_a)
\righT).\end{aLiGNed}$$ its boundary Term (For asymptOticalLY flat spACetimes) Takes tHe fOrm $$\BegiN{AlIgNed}
{\CaL p}= \frAC{1}{8\pI G\bETa} \oInt_{\delta\siGmA} N^a E^b_I ~ A_a^i ~ \MATHRm{d}S_B.\enD{aliGned}$$ ON the other hand, In oUr reDUceD theoRy, the ReduCeD diffEomorpHism cOnStraint is given bY $$\begIn{aligned}
\FraC{1}{8\pI G}d(\VeC N)&=\fraC{1}{4\Pi G\betA}\inT_\siGma N^a\leFt(\e^b_i\paRTiaL_a\A^I_B-\PaRtial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_a^\PhI\DElTa^i_3\varepSilon_{iJK}\a^J_b\E^B_k
\right),\
. At the boundary $\delta\Sigma$, w e hav e $ $\b eg in{a lign ed}
 q_{\phi r } &=0,  \\
 \sqrt{q}&=r^{3/2}  \sqr t{ r +r_s }  \ sin\t heta, \ \ 
N _ \ph i&=  -\ fr a c{ 2J \s in^ 2\theta }{r} ~~ \r igh ta rrow ~~ N^\p h i= -\frac{2J} {r^ 3}, \\
 K_{\ phi  r}&=\ fr ac{ 3  J \s in^ 2 \th eta}{\ s qrt{r^ 3 (r-r_s) +4 J ^2 \si n ^2 \the t a }} , \\ 
 K&=0.\end{align e d} $ $ Performing t he int eg r al , the  le ading term  i n the expansi o ni n $1/ r $ is $$\begin {aligned}
{ \ cal  P} =\l im_ { r\to\i nfty} \f r ac{ 9\pi}{64 G}  \fr ac{J^2}{r }=0.\l a bel{6.9 } \end{al igned} $$
No w, i n  A sh tek ar - Bar b er o v a ria bles, th edi ffeom orph i s m cons tra intof th e full theory  ta kest heform$$\be gin{ al igned }
\fra c{1}{ 16 \pi G}D(\vec N) &=\f rac{1}{8\ piG\ bet a} \int_ \ SigmaN^a \le ft(E^b_ i\parti a l_a A^ i _ b -\ partial_b(E^b_iA^i _a ) \r ight).\e nd{ali g ne d} $ $ Its bo un dar y te r m  (for  asy m pt otically  flats pa ce times)ta kes th efor m $ $\beg i n{al igned} 
{\cal P }= \f r ac{1}{8\pi G\b e ta} \oint_{\d e lt a \ Si g ma}N^a  E^b_i ~ A_ a^i~  \ma thrm { d} S_b . \end{ align ed } $$ On the other hand,in  our r educe d theory, the  reduced d i f f eomorphi sm c o ns t raint is given  by $ $\begin{al i gned}
\f rac{1 }{8\pi G }d(\vec N ) & =\frac{1 }{4 \pi  G\ bet a } \i nt_\sigma N^a \ l eft( \e ^b_i\pa rti al_a\a^ i_b -\p art ial _b (\e^b_i\a ^i_a)+\d el ta _a ^\ phi \delt a ^i_3\var ep sil on _{i jk}\a ^ j_b\e^ b_k
\ righ t) ,\ 
. At_the boundary_$\delta \Sigma$, we have_$$\begin{aligned}
 q_{\phi_r}&=0,_\\
 \sqrt{q}&=r^{3/2}_\sqrt{r+r_s}_\sin\theta, \\
 N_\phi_&= -\frac{2J \sin^2\theta}{r}_~~ \rightarrow ~~ N^\phi=-\frac{2J}{r^3},_\\
 K_{\phi r}&=\frac{3_J_\sin^2 \theta}{\sqrt{r^3 (r-r_s)+4J^2 \sin^2 \theta}}, \\
 K&=0.\end{aligned}$$ Performing the integral, the leading term in_the_expansion in_$1/r$_is_$$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P} = \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{9\pi}{64 G}_\frac{J^2}{r}=0.\label{6.9}\end{aligned}$$

Now, in Ashtekar-Barbero variables, the_diffeomorphism constraint_of the full theory takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{16\pi_G}D(\vec_N)&=\frac{1}{8\pi G\beta}\int_\Sigma N^a\left(E^b_i\partial_aA^i_b-\partial_b(E^b_iA^i_a)
\right).\end{aligned}$$_Its boundary term (for asymptotically flat spacetimes) takes the_form $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P}= \frac{1}{8\pi G\beta} \oint_{\delta\Sigma}_N^a E^b_i ~_A_a^i_~_\mathrm{d}S_b.\end{aligned}$$ On the other_hand, in our reduced theory, the_reduced diffeomorphism constraint is given by_$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{8\pi G}d(\vec N)&=\frac{1}{4\pi G\beta}\int_\sigma N^a\left(\e^b_i\partial_a\a^i_b-\partial_b(\e^b_i\a^i_a)+\delta_a^\phi\delta^i_3\varepsilon_{ijk}\a^j_b\e^b_k
\right),\