 in the LSCO/LBCO family at relatively low temperatures. Our view is that the recently discovered CDW which survives up to 150K are distinct from the stripe physics associated with LSCO/LBCO. The wave-vector decreases with increasing doping, whereas the stripe wave vector increases linearly up to about 0.125 doping and saturate, following the Yamada plot[@yamada1998PRB57doping]. For YBCO the period is incommensurate and close to 3, very different from the period 4 CDW associated with 1/8 doping in LSCO. Finally there is no sign of the SDW that is “intertwined” with the stripes. As phenomenology the bi-directional PDW produces the pseudogap at the antinodes and the Fermi arcs near the nodes. (strictly speaking these are the electron-like segments of closed orbits made up of Bogoliubov quasi-particles.) It explains why the gap closes at the end of the Fermi arcs with states moving up from lower energy, while a CDW-generated gap will necessarily close by a state coming down in energy. As opposed to conventional pairing, the spectrum is not particle-hole symmetric at each k point, which explains why the momentum of the minimum gap is shifted away from the original Fermi surface. In addition, CDW at wave-vectors $Q=2P_1$ and $2P_2$ naturally emerges as subsidiary orders. The states at the Fermi arc’s play two important roles. First they greatly suppress the superfluid density and therefore the phase stiffness, so that the PDW is subject to strong phase fluctuations over most of the phase diagram in the H-T plane. Secondly the normal state gives rise to a linear term in the entropy, which lowers the free energy and stabilizes it at finite temperatures, even if it is not the true ground state. In addition, in the superconducting state, a CDW with period $P_1$ and $P_2 (=Q/2)$ naturally appears if the PDW phase is pinned to that of the d wave pairing and reference was made to an STM experiment on YBCO where CDW at $Q$ and $Q/2$ have been reported[@Yeh1; @Yeh2], where $Q=0.28 (2\pi/a)$ matches what is now determined by X-ray scattering.

We should point out that other workers have also associated PD
in the LSCO / LBCO family at relatively low temperatures. Our view is that the recently discover CDW which exist up to 150 K are distinct from the stripe physics consort with LSCO / LBCO. The wave - vector decreases with increasing doping, whereas the stripe wave vector increase linearly up to approximately 0.125 doping and saturate, following the Yamada plot[@yamada1998PRB57doping ]. For YBCO the period is incommensurate and close to 3, very different from the period 4 CDW consociate with 1/8 doping in LSCO. Finally there is no polarity of the SDW that is “ intertwined ” with the stripe. As phenomenology the bi - directional PDW produces the pseudogap at the antinode and the Fermi arcs near the nodes. (strictly talk these are the electron - like segments of shut orbits make up of Bogoliubov quasi - particles .) It explain why the gap closes at the end of the Fermi arc with states moving up from lower energy, while a CDW - generated break will necessarily close by a state coming down in energy. As opposed to conventional pairing, the spectrum is not particle - hole symmetric at each kelvin point, which explains why the momentum of the minimal break is careen away from the original Fermi surface. In accession, CDW at wave - vectors $ Q=2P_1 $ and $ 2P_2 $ naturally emerges as subsidiary orders. The country at the Fermi arc ’s play two important roles. First they greatly suppress the superfluid concentration and therefore the phase stiffness, so that the PDW is subject to strong phase fluctuations over most of the phase diagram in the H - T plane. Secondly the normal state of matter gives rise to a linear term in the entropy, which frown the free energy and stabilizes it at finite temperatures, even if it is not the true ground state. In addition, in the superconducting country, a CDW with period $ P_1 $ and $ P_2 (= Q/2)$ naturally appears if the PDW phase is trap to that of the d wave coupling and reference was made to an STM experiment on YBCO where CDW at $ Q$ and $ Q/2 $ have been reported[@Yeh1; @Yeh2 ], where $ Q=0.28 (2\pi / a)$ matches what is now determine by X - ray scattering. 

 We should point out that other actor have also associated PD
 in the LSCO/LBCO family at velatively low tgmperatuces. Our view is that the recently discoverev CDQ whixh survives up to 150K ard distincn from thw stcipe physics associated with LAGO/LBCM. The wave-vectot decreases fith increasinc ao'ing, whereas the stripe wave vector yncreasrs linearly up tj abptt 0.125 soping and saturate, following the Gamada klot[@yamada1998PRB57dopinb]. For YBCO the period is ijcomlensurate and closf to 3, very eiffqeent from thd period 4 BBW associatgd with 1/8 doping in LSCO. Finally ghere is no sigb if hve SDW that is “igtertwined” wlnh the vtripes. As phenomenolpgy thw bi-directional PDW pcoduces the pseudogak at the attnnodes and the Fermi qrxs nedr tve nuees. (stdirtlg speaninj these are the electrin-like segments of vljwed orbits mase up jf Bogoliubov quasi-particles.) It explains fhy the gap closes at the wnd of the Fermi arcs with staees moving up from lower energy, while a CDW-generaded gep wiol vwcfssarily close by a state coming down in enerdg. Ss opposed to cokventional pairing, tje fpectrum is nut parcjcme-hole symmetric ah each h poibt, which txplaons why the momentum of the minimum gap us shifted away frlm the orignnal Fgrmi sirface. In addition, CDW ct wavs-vectors $Q=2P_1$ and $2P_2$ nafjrally emerges ar slbsigiary orders. The states at the Fermm arc’x play gwo omportwnt roles. Virst they greatly supprfss tke su[erfluid dfnsity and therefore the phase stiffness, so tnad tve PDW if submect to strong [hase fluctuatnons ovex most of the phzse diajram in the R-T plane. Secotfly the normel state divew riwe to a uinear term in the entropy, which oowers the free encrgy xhd stabilizes ic qt finite tempetatjref, vvei if yd is not the trud gfpund rtate. In adbigion, in the superconducthng atate, a CDW with prrlod $P_1$ and $P_2 (=Q/2)$ nattrally appearx if the PDW phase is pmnned vo thay os the d wave pairing and refersnce was ladc to an STM evperlmenj on YBCO wkere CDW at $Q$ and $Q/2$ have been reported[@Yei1; @Yeh2], where $Q=0.28 (2\pi/a)$ matchws what is now detetmiked by X-ray xcattqring.

We svould point out that other workers haye also associated PD
in the LSCO/LBCO family at relatively low view that the discovered CDW which distinct the stripe physics with LSCO/LBCO. The decreases with increasing doping, whereas the wave vector increases linearly up to about 0.125 doping and saturate, following the plot[@yamada1998PRB57doping]. For YBCO the period is incommensurate and close to 3, very different the 4 associated 1/8 doping in LSCO. Finally there is no sign of the SDW that is “intertwined” with stripes. As phenomenology the bi-directional PDW produces the at the antinodes and Fermi arcs near the nodes. speaking are the segments closed made up of quasi-particles.) It explains why the gap closes at the end of the Fermi arcs with states moving from lower a CDW-generated will close a state coming energy. As opposed to conventional pairing, not particle-hole symmetric at each k point, which why the of the minimum gap is shifted from the original Fermi surface. In addition, CDW wave-vectors $Q=2P_1$ and $2P_2$ naturally emerges as subsidiary orders. The states at the Fermi arc’s important roles. First they suppress the superfluid and the stiffness, that the is subject to strong phase fluctuations over most of the phase in the H-T plane. Secondly the normal state gives rise linear in the entropy, lowers the free energy stabilizes at finite temperatures, even is the In in superconducting state, a CDW period $P_1$ and $P_2 (=Q/2)$ appears if the PDW of the d wave pairing and reference was to an STM experiment on YBCO where at $Q$ and $Q/2$ have been reported[@Yeh1; @Yeh2], where $Q=0.28 (2\pi/a)$ matches is now X-ray scattering. We should point out that other have also associated PD
 in the LSCO/LBCO family at relaTively low tEmperAtuRes. ouR vieW is tHat the recently DIscoVered CDW which survives uP to 150K aRe DIstiNCt From tHe stripE PhYSIcs AsSoCiaTeD WiTh LSCo/LBcO. The waVe-vector deCreAsEs with increaSInG doping, wheReaS the stripe waVe vEctor iNcReaSEs linEarLy up tO about 0.125 DOping aNd saturatE, fOLlowinG The YamaDA PlOt[@yaMada1998PRB57doping]. For YbcO THe period is incoMmensuRaTE aND CloSe tO 3, very diffeReNt froM The periOD 4 Cdw ASsoCIated with 1/8 dopiNg in LSCO. FinALly There iS nO siGN of the sDW thAt IS “inTertwined” wiTh thE stripes. AS phenoMEnology THe bi-dirEctionAl PdW pRoduCEs ThE psEuDOgaP At The ANtiNodes and ThE FErmi aRcs nEAR THe noDes. (StriCtly sPeaking these aRe tHe elECtrOn-likE segmEnts Of CloseD orbitS made Up Of Bogoliubov quaSi-paRticles.) It ExpLaIns WhY the gAP closeS at The End of thE Fermi aRCs wItH STAtEs moving up from loweR eNERgY, while a CdW-geneRAtEd GAp will neCeSsaRily CLOse by A staTE cOming dowN in eneRGy. as Opposed To ConvenTiOnaL paIring, THe spEctrum Is not parTicle-HOle symmetric at EAch k point, whicH ExPLAiNS why The Momentum of tHe miNImum Gap iS ShIftED away From tHe ORiGInal Fermi surface. In aDdItion, CdW at wAve-vectors $Q=2P_1$ aNd $2P_2$ naturalLY EMerges as SubsIDiARy orders. The staTes at The Fermi arC’S play two ImporTant roleS. First theY GReatly suPprEss The SupERFlUid density and THErefOrE the phaSe sTiffnesS, so ThaT thE PDw iS subject tO strong pHaSe FlUcTuaTions OVer most oF tHe pHaSe dIagraM In the H-t planE. SecOnDlY The Normal sTAtE GIves RiSe To a lIneAr Term iN the ENtrOpy, whicH lowers thE frEE eneRgY aNd stabiLizes it at finiTe TemperaturEs, EveN if it iS NOt the truE ground state. In addition, iN The supeRcoNductIng sTate, a CDW wIth Period $p_1$ anD $p_2 (=Q/2)$ natuRally aPpearS iF thE pdW phaSE Is PinNeD to that of tHE D waVe paiRiNg anD refereNce was made to an STM eXPerIment on YBCO whEre cDW aT $q$ AnD $Q/2$ hAVe BEen RePOrtED[@yeh1; @Yeh2], where $Q=0.28 (2\pi/a)$ Matches whaT iS NoW determineD By X-RaY scatteRing.

We sHould POint out That other Workers haVe Also ASSocIated PD
 in the LSCO/LBCO family a t relative ly lo w t emp er atur es.Our view is th a t th e recently discoveredCDW w hi c h su r vi ves u p to 15 0 Ka r e d is ti nct  f r om  thestr ipe phy sics assoc iat ed  with LSCO/L B CO . The wave -ve ctor decreas eswith i nc rea s ing d opi ng, w hereas the st ripe wave  v e ctor i n creases l in earl y up to about 0.1 2 5d oping and satu rate,fo l lo w i ngthe  Yamada pl ot [@yam a da1998P R B5 7 d o pin g ]. For YBCO t he period i s  in commen su rat e  and c loseto 3,very differ entfrom theperiod 4 CDW a s sociate d with  1/ 8 d opin g  i nLSC O. Fin a ll y t h ere  is no s ig nof th e SD W t h at i s “ inte rtwin ed” with thestr ipes .  As  phen omeno logy  t he bi -direc tiona lPDW produces th e ps eudogap a t t he  an ti nodes and th e F erm i arcsnear th e  no de s . (s trictly speaking t he s e  a re the e lectro n -l ik e  segment sofclos e d  orbi ts m a de  up of B ogoliu b ov  q uasi-pa rt icles. )Itexp lains whythe ga p closes  at t h e end of the F e rmi arcs with st a t es movi ngup from low er e n ergy , wh i le  aC DW-ge nerat ed ga p  will necessarily c lo se bya sta te coming dow n in energ y . As oppos ed t o  c o nventional pai ring,  the spect r um is no t par ticle-ho le symmet r i c at eac h k  po int , w h i ch  explains why t he m om entum o f t he mini mum  ga p i s s hi fted away  from th eor ig in alFermi surface.  I n a dd iti on, C D W at w ave-v ecto rs  $ Q =2P _1$ and $2 P _ 2$ n at ur ally  em er ges a s su b sid iary or ders. The  st a tesat  t he Ferm i arc’s playtw o importan trol es. Fi r s t they g reatly suppress the sup e rfluidden sityandtherefore  th e phas e s t iffnes s, sothatth e P D W  is s u b je ctto  strong ph a s e f luctu at ions  over m ost of the phase d i agr am in the H-T  pl ane. S ec ond l yt heno r mal s tate gives rise  to a line ar te rm in thee ntr op y, whic h lower s the free en ergy andstabilize sit a t fin ite temper atures,even if i t  is n o tthe t rue  groun dsta te. I n addi t ion , inthe su pe rcondu cting  s tate, aCDW with period $P_1$ a nd $P_ 2 (=Q /2) $ natural lya ppe ars if th e PD W phase is  pi nne d totha t  of t he d wa vep airin g an d  referenc e  w asm a de  to an STMe x p eri mentonY BCO wh ereCDW at $Q$ and $Q / 2$ have been r epor t e d[@ Yeh 1 ; @Y eh 2], where $Q=0 .28  ( 2 \ pi/a)$ m at ches what i s now de te r mined  by X- ray sc atterin g . 
W e shou ld p oin t out tha t o th e r worke rs  h a ve als o as so ciated  PD
 in_the LSCO/LBCO_family at relatively low_temperatures. Our_view_is that_the_recently discovered CDW_which survives up_to 150K are distinct_from the stripe_physics_associated with LSCO/LBCO. The wave-vector decreases with increasing doping, whereas the stripe wave vector_increases_linearly up_to_about_0.125 doping and saturate, following_the Yamada plot[@yamada1998PRB57doping]. For YBCO_the period_is incommensurate and close to 3, very different_from_the period 4_CDW associated with 1/8 doping in LSCO. Finally there_is no sign of the SDW_that is “intertwined”_with_the_stripes. As phenomenology the_bi-directional PDW produces the pseudogap at_the antinodes and the Fermi arcs_near the nodes. (strictly speaking these are_the electron-like segments of closed orbits_made up of Bogoliubov quasi-particles.)_It explains_why the gap closes at_the end of_the Fermi_arcs with states_moving up from lower energy, while_a CDW-generated gap_will necessarily close by a state_coming_down in energy._As_opposed_to conventional_pairing, the spectrum_is_not particle-hole_symmetric_at each k point, which explains_why_the momentum of the minimum gap is_shifted away from the_original_Fermi surface. In addition,_CDW at wave-vectors $Q=2P_1$ and_$2P_2$ naturally emerges as subsidiary orders._The states_at the_Fermi arc’s play two important roles. First they greatly suppress the_superfluid density and therefore the phase_stiffness, so that the_PDW is_subject_to strong phase_fluctuations_over most_of the phase diagram in the H-T_plane. Secondly_the normal state gives rise to_a linear term in_the_entropy, which lowers the free energy_and stabilizes it at finite temperatures,_even if it is not_the_true_ground state. In addition, in_the superconducting state, a CDW with_period $P_1$ and_$P_2 (=Q/2)$ naturally appears if the PDW_phase_is pinned to that of the_d_wave pairing and reference was made_to_an_STM experiment on YBCO where_CDW at $Q$ and $Q/2$ have_been reported[@Yeh1; @Yeh2], where $Q=0.28 (2\pi/a)$ matches what is_now determined by_X-ray scattering.

We should point out_that_other_workers have also associated PD