}=\sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm
max}=\sigma\sqrt{10}=3.16\sigma$, and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.83\sigma$. In the case of Kramers ions the $\Delta {\cal E}$ variation range turns out to be smaller than that for non-Kramers ions, which is seen comparing the $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm min}$ and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm max}$ for $J=4$ and $J=9/2$. Finally, taking the most extreme case of $J=15/2$ for $f$-electron configurations (e.g. for Dy$^{3+}$, Er$^{3+}$) with eight doublets, we would obtain $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm min}=\sigma\frac{16}{3\sqrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $\Delta {\cal
E}_{\rm max}=4\sigma$, and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\sigma$.

4. The new scale of the crystal-field strength. Comparison of both the scales $S_{k}=\frac{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$ and $S_{k}^{\prime}=|{\cal H}_{\rm CF}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ {#the-new-scale-of-the-crystal-field-strength.-comparison-of-both-the-scales-s_kfrac12k1m_k-and-s_kprimecal-h_rm-cfk_rm-av.unnumbered}
=================================================================================================================================================================

4.1. Average values of the axial parameter modules $|B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$ and $|\sum_{k}B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$, where $k=2,4,6$ – the rotational invariants of the equivalent ${\cal
H}_{\rm CF}$ parametrizations {#average-values-of-the-axial-parameter-modules-b_k0prime_rm-av-and-sum_kb_k0prime_rm-av-where-k246-the-rotational-invariants-of-the-equivalent-calh_rm-cf-parametrizations.unnumbered}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rotating the reference frame by the two Euler angles $\alpha$ and
} = \sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm 
 max}=\sigma\sqrt{10}=3.16\sigma$, and $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.83\sigma$. In the case of Kramers ions the $ \Delta { \cal E}$ variation range turns out to be little than that for non - Kramers ion, which is seen comparing the $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm min}$ and $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm max}$ for $ J=4 $ and $ J=9/2$. ultimately, take the most extreme case of $ J=15/2 $ for $ f$-electron shape (for example for Dy$^{3+}$, Er$^{3+}$) with eight doublets, we would obtain $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm min}=\sigma\frac{16}{3\sqrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $ \Delta { \cal 
 E}_{\rm max}=4\sigma$, and $ \Delta { \cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\sigma$. 

 4. The new scale of the crystal - playing field strength. Comparison of both the scales $ S_{k}=\frac{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$ and $ S_{k}^{\prime}=|{\cal H}_{\rm CF}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ { # the - raw - plate - of - the - crystal - field - strength.-comparison - of - both - the - scale - s_kfrac12k1m_k - and - s_kprimecal - h_rm - cfk_rm - av.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 4.1. Average values of the axile parameter modules $ |B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$ and $ |\sum_{k}B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$, where $ k=2,4,6 $ – the rotational invariants of the equivalent $ { \cal 
 H}_{\rm CF}$ parametrizations { # median - values - of - the - axial - argument - modules - b_k0prime_rm - ab - and - sum_kb_k0prime_rm - av - where - k246 - the - rotational - invariants - of - the - equivalent - calh_rm - cf - parametrizations.unnumbered } 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Rotating the reference frame by the two Euler lean $ \alpha$ and
}=\sigla\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $\Delta {\cau E}_{\rm
max}=\sigma\sqtt{10}=3.16\wigma$, end $\Delfa {\cal E}_{\fm hom}=2.83\sigma$. In the case of Kcamees iobs the $\Delta {\cal E}$ varkation rajge turnw ouu to be smaller tizn that for nkk-Kramzrw ions, which ix seen com[aring the $\Delda {\ccl E}_{\rm min}$ and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm max}$ for $J=4$ and $K=9/2$. Vinally, taking the iost vxureme case of $J=15/2$ for $f$-electron conriguratpons (e.g. for Dy$^{3+}$, Er$^{3+}$) with eight doublets, we wokld lbtain $\Delta {\cal E}_{\gm min}=\sigma\drac{16}{3\fwrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $\Delga {\cal
E}_{\rm max}=4\sigma$, and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\sigma$.

4. The new scalz of the crisfap-xield strenjth. Coiparison of npth tha scalex $S_{k}=\frac{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$ anc $S_{n}^{\prume}=|{\cal H}_{\rm CF}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ {#tie-new-scale-of-the-crystwl-field-stseugth.-comparison-of-both-tye-wcalev-s_kfsac12k1o_j-ana-s_kkrikedal-h_rm-ffk_cm-av.unnumbeded}
=================================================================================================================================================================

4.1. Average values of the axiak [qrameter modumes $|B_{k0}^{\[ryme}|_{\rm av}$ and $|\sum_{k}B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$, where $k=2,4,6$ – uhe rktational invariants of the equivalent ${\cal
H}_{\rl CF}$ paraietrizations {#average-values-of-the-axial-parameter-modunes-b_k0'rkme_xn-av-ana-wul_kb_k0prime_rm-av-where-k246-the-rotational-invariants-of-trs-eaupvalent-calh_rm-cf-pavametrizations.unnukbfrrq}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rotating the referzhcs frame by the two Euler wnglew $\alpha$ agd
}=\sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm max}=\sigma\sqrt{10}=3.16\sigma$, and $\Delta hom}=2.83\sigma$. the case Kramers ions the turns to be smaller that for non-Kramers which is seen comparing the $\Delta E}_{\rm min}$ and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm max}$ for $J=4$ and $J=9/2$. Finally, taking most extreme case of $J=15/2$ for $f$-electron configurations (e.g. for Dy$^{3+}$, Er$^{3+}$) with doublets, would $\Delta E}_{\rm min}=\sigma\frac{16}{3\sqrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm max}=4\sigma$, and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\sigma$. 4. The new scale of crystal-field strength. Comparison of both the scales $S_{k}=\frac{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$ $S_{k}^{\prime}=|{\cal H}_{\rm CF}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ ================================================================================================================================================================= 4.1. Average values of axial modules $|B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm and av}$, $k=2,4,6$ – the invariants of the equivalent ${\cal H}_{\rm CF}$ parametrizations {#average-values-of-the-axial-parameter-modules-b_k0prime_rm-av-and-sum_kb_k0prime_rm-av-where-k246-the-rotational-invariants-of-the-equivalent-calh_rm-cf-parametrizations.unnumbered} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rotating the reference frame by the two angles $\alpha$
}=\sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $\Delta {\caL E}_{\rm
max}=\sigMa\sqrT{10}=3.16\siGma$, AnD $\DelTa {\caL E}_{\rm hom}=2.83\sigma$. In THe caSe of Kramers ions the $\DeltA {\cal E}$ VaRIatiON rAnge tUrns out TO bE SMalLeR tHan ThAT fOr non-kraMers ionS, which is seEn cOmParing the $\DelTA {\cAl E}_{\rm min}$ anD $\DeLta {\cal E}_{\rm max}$ For $j=4$ and $J=9/2$. FInAllY, TakinG thE most ExtremE Case of $j=15/2$ for $f$-elecTrON confiGUrationS (E.G. fOr Dy$^{3+}$, er$^{3+}$) with eight doubleTS, wE Would obtain $\DelTa {\cal E}_{\Rm MIn}=\SIGma\FraC{16}{3\sqrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $\deLta {\caL
e}_{\rm max}=4\sIGmA$, AND $\DeLTa {\cal E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\siGma$.

4. The new scALe oF the crYsTal-FIeld stRengtH. COMpaRison of both The sCales $S_{k}=\frAc{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$ aND $S_{k}^{\primE}=|{\Cal H}_{\rm Cf}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ {#The-New-ScalE-Of-ThE-crYsTAl-fIElD-stREngTh.-comparIsOn-Of-botH-the-SCALEs-s_kFraC12k1m_k-And-s_kPrimecal-h_rm-cfK_rm-Av.unNUmbEred}
=================================================================================================================================================================

4.1. AVeragE valUeS of thE axial ParamEtEr modules $|B_{k0}^{\primE}|_{\rm aV}$ and $|\sum_{k}B_{K0}^{\prImE}|_{\rm Av}$, Where $K=2,4,6$ – The rotAtiOnaL invariAnts of tHE eqUiVALEnT ${\cal
H}_{\rm CF}$ parametriZaTIOnS {#average-Values-OF-tHe-AXial-paraMeTer-ModuLES-b_k0prIme_rM-Av-And-sum_kb_K0prime_RM-aV-wHere-k246-thE-rOtatioNaL-inVarIants-OF-the-EquivaLent-calh_Rm-cf-pARametrizations.UNnumbered}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RotaTInG THe REferEncE frame by the Two EULer aNgleS $\AlPha$ ANd
}=\sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}} =2.04\sigm a$, $ \De lta  { \cal  E}_ {\rm
max}=\sig m a\sq rt{10}=3.16\sigma$, an d $\D el t a {\ c al  E}_{ \rm hom } =2 . 8 3\s ig ma $.In th e cas e o f Krame rs ions th e $ \D elta {\cal E } $variationran ge turns out  to  be sm al ler thantha t for  non-K r amersions, whi ch is see n  compar i n gthe$\Delta {\cal E}_ { \r m  min}$ and $\D elta { \c a lE } _{\ rmmax}$ for$J =4$ a n d $J=9/ 2 $. F i nal l y, taking the  most extre m e c ase of  $ J=1 5 /2$ fo r $f$ -e l ect ron configu rati ons (e.g.  for D y $^{3+}$ ,  Er$^{3 +}$) w ith  ei ghtd ou bl ets ,w e w o ul d o b tai n $\Delt a{\ cal E }_{\ r m m in}= \si gma\ frac{ 16}{3\sqrt{7} }=2 .02\ s igm a$, $ \Delt a {\ ca l
E}_ {\rm m ax}=4 \s igma$, and $\De lta{\cal E}_ {\r mhom }= 2.37\ s igma$. 

4 . T he newscale o f  th ec r y st al-field strength.  C o m pa rison of  botht he  s c ales $S_ {k }=\ frac { 1 }{2k+ 1}M_ { k} $ and $S _{k}^{ \ pr im e}=|{\c al  H}_{\ rm  CF }^{ (k)}| _ {\rm  av}${#the-ne w-sca l e-of-the-cryst a l-field-stren g th . - co m pari son -of-both-th e-sc a les- s_kf r ac 12k 1 m_k-a nd-s_ kp r im e cal-h_rm-cfk_rm-av. un number ed}
= ============= ========== = = = ======== ==== = == = ============== ===== ========== = ======== ===== ======== ========= = = ======== === === === === = = == ============= = = ==== == ======= === =

4.1.  Av era geval ue s of theaxial pa ra me te rmod ules$ |B_{k0}^ {\ pri me }|_ {\rma v}$ an d $|\ sum_ {k }B _ {k0 }^{\pri m e} | _ {\rm  a v} $, w her e$k=2, 4,6$ – t he rota tional in var i ants  o fthe equ ivalent ${\ca lH}_{\rm CF }$  pa rametr i z ations { #average-values-of-the- a xial-pa ram eter- modu les-b_k0p rim e_rm-a v-a n d-sum_ kb_k0p rime_ rm -av - w here- k 2 46 -th e- rotational - i nva riant s- of-t he-equi valent-calh_rm-cf- p ara metrizations. unn umbe r e d} 
-- - -- - --- -- - --- - - --------------- ---------- -- - -- ---------- - --- -- ------- ------- ----- - ------- --------- --------- -- ---- - - --- ---------- -------- --------- - ----- - -- ----- --- ------ -- --- ----- ------ - --- -

Ro tating  t he ref erenc eframe by  the two Euler angles $ \alpha $ and 
}=\sigma\frac{5}{\sqrt{6}}=2.04\sigma$, $\Delta_{\cal E}_{\rm
max}=\sigma\sqrt{10}=3.16\sigma$,_and $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm_hom}=2.83\sigma$. In_the_case of_Kramers_ions the $\Delta_{\cal E}$ variation_range turns out to_be smaller than_that_for non-Kramers ions, which is seen comparing the $\Delta {\cal E}_{\rm min}$ and $\Delta_{\cal_E}_{\rm max}$_for_$J=4$_and $J=9/2$. Finally, taking the_most extreme case of $J=15/2$_for $f$-electron_configurations (e.g. for Dy$^{3+}$, Er$^{3+}$) with eight doublets,_we_would obtain $\Delta_{\cal E}_{\rm min}=\sigma\frac{16}{3\sqrt{7}}=2.02\sigma$, $\Delta {\cal
E}_{\rm max}=4\sigma$, and $\Delta {\cal_E}_{\rm hom}=2.37\sigma$.

4. The new scale of_the crystal-field strength._Comparison_of_both the scales $S_{k}=\frac{1}{2k+1}M_{k}$_and $S_{k}^{\prime}=|{\cal H}_{\rm CF}^{(k)}|_{\rm av}$ {#the-new-scale-of-the-crystal-field-strength.-comparison-of-both-the-scales-s_kfrac12k1m_k-and-s_kprimecal-h_rm-cfk_rm-av.unnumbered}
=================================================================================================================================================================

4.1._Average values of the axial parameter_modules $|B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$ and $|\sum_{k}B_{k0}^{\prime}|_{\rm av}$, where_$k=2,4,6$ – the rotational invariants of_the equivalent ${\cal
H}_{\rm CF}$ parametrizations_{#average-values-of-the-axial-parameter-modules-b_k0prime_rm-av-and-sum_kb_k0prime_rm-av-where-k246-the-rotational-invariants-of-the-equivalent-calh_rm-cf-parametrizations.unnumbered}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rotating the_reference frame by the two_Euler angles $\alpha$_and