 levels for the $n \leq 4$ configurations have been calculated for O-like. Wavelengths, E1, M1, and E2 transition rates, line strengths, and oscillator strengths for the transitions among these 318 levels are also reported.

The accuracy of energy levels and transition probabilities is estimated by comparing the MBPT and MCDF results with available experimental and theoretical data. The average difference with the standard deviation with the NIST values for the levels are $-249 \pm 748$ cm$^{-1}$ for MBPT $-68 \pm 471$ cm$^{-1}$ which indicates the high accuracy of the present two calculations. For the $n=3, 4$ levels, the average absolute difference of the present MBPT and MCDF energy values $296\pm646$ cm$^{-1}$, corresponding to the average relative difference of $0.001~\%\pm0.002~\%$, The uncertainty of line strength is assessed for each transition, and is available in Table \[table2\]. The present calculations provide a consistent and accurate data set for line identification and modeling purposes, which can also be considered as a benchmark for other calculations.

Acknowledges
============

We acknowledge the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2017YFA0403200, the Science Challenge Project of China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP) under Grant No. TZ2016005, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11703004, No. 11674066, No. 11504421, and No. 11474034), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China (A2019201300 and A2017201165), and the Natural Science Foundation of Educational Department of Hebei Province, China (BJ2018058). Kai Wang expresses his gratitude to the support from the visiting researcher program of Fudan University.

[cllrrrccl]{}

\
Key & $LSJ$-coupled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $E_{\rm MBPT}$& $\Delta E$ & $\tau_{\rm MCDF}$ & $\tau_{\rm MBPT}$ & $jj$-coupled CSF$^{a,b,c}$\

\
Key & $LSJ$-coupled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $E_{\rm MBPT}$& $\
levels for the $ n \leq 4 $ configurations have been calculated for oxygen - alike. Wavelengths, E1, M1, and E2 transition pace, cable strengths, and oscillator strengths for the transition among these 318 level are also report. 

 The accuracy of energy levels and conversion probabilities is estimated by compare the MBPT and MCDF result with available experimental and theoretical data. The average difference with the standard deviation with the NIST values for the degree are $ -249 \pm 748 $ cm$^{-1}$ for MBPT $ -68 \pm 471 $ cm$^{-1}$ which indicates the high accuracy of the present two calculations. For the $ n=3, 4 $ level, the average absolute difference of the present MBPT and MCDF energy values $ 296\pm646 $ cm$^{-1}$, match to the average relative difference of $ 0.001~\%\pm0.002~\%$, The uncertainty of line lastingness is assessed for each transition, and is available in Table   \[table2\ ]. The present calculations provide a consistent and accurate data set for line identification and modeling purposes, which can also be considered as a benchmark for other calculations. 

 Acknowledges 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We acknowledge the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No.   2017YFA0403200, the Science Challenge Project of China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP) under Grant No.   TZ2016005, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.   11703004, No.   11674066, No.   11504421, and No.   11474034), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China (A2019201300 and A2017201165), and the Natural Science Foundation of Educational Department of Hebei Province, China (BJ2018058). Kai Wang express his gratitude to the support from the visiting research worker platform of Fudan University. 

 [ cllrrrccl ] { } 

 \ 
 Key & $ LSJ$-coupled CSF & $ J\pi$ & $ E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $ E_{\rm MBPT}$ & $ \Delta E$ & $ \tau_{\rm MCDF}$ & $ \tau_{\rm MBPT}$ & $ jj$-coupled CSF$^{a, b, c}$\ 

 \ 
 Key & $ LSJ$-coupled CSF & $ J\pi$ & $ E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $ E_{\rm MBPT}$ & $ \
 legels for the $n \leq 4$ conflgurations have ywen canculatsd for O-uike. Wavelengths, E1, M1, and E2 tcansution rates, line strengths, xnd oscilpator steenguhs for the transmfions among tgcse 318 nxvels are also teported.

The dccuracy of enarey levels and transition probabilitief is esyilated by compating uhe MBPF and MCDF results with available sxperimtntal and theoretival data. The average diffegencf with the standarf deviation witr the NIST vauues for the levels arg $-249 \pm 748$ cm$^{-1}$ for MBPT $-68 \pm 471$ cm$^{-1}$ which indieates the hugy afwuracy of tie prefent two calgllationv. For tne $n=3, 4$ levels, tme avxragw absolute difference of the present MBKT and MCDX znergy values $296\pm646$ cm$^{-1}$, cireespotdinc to rhe avtraje delatige vifference kf $0.001~\%\pm0.002~\%$, The ubcertainty of line xtwvmgth is asseased fjr each transition, and is available in Tatle \[fable2\]. The present calcuoations provide a condistent agd accurate data set for line identification and kodelmne pbvioser, wjich can also be considered as a benchmark fow ouheg calculations.

Ackkowledges
============

We acknowkefgr the support wrom tks Hational Key Reseagch and Deveoopment Pwogrsm of China under Grant No. 2017YDA0403200, the Scienbe Cyallenge Project oy China Acadzmy of Engimeering Physics (CAEP) unber Grznt No. TZ2016005, thf Nationam Natural Science Folndadion of China (Grant No. 11703004, No. 11674066, Go. 11504421, and No. 11474034), the Naturau Scoence Soundation of Hctei Province, China (A2019201300 anb A2017201165), atd the Natkral Science Foundation of Educevional Departkett mf Hebei Provlnce, China (BJ2018058). Kwi Wang expresxes his gratktude to tge suppmrt from thq visiting revgarcher progrem of Fudwn Ubiveesity.

[clufrrccl]{}

\
Key & $LSJ$-voupled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $E_{\rm MBPT}$& $\Dekta S$ & $\tau_{\rm MCDF}$ & $\ccu_{\tn MBPT}$ & $jj$-coupked CSS$^{a,h,c}$\

\
Ler & $LSJ$-coupled CSF& $J\pk$ &$E_{\rm OCDF}$ & $E_{\rm MNPT}$& $\
levels for the $n \leq 4$ configurations calculated O-like. Wavelengths, M1, and E2 oscillator for the transitions these 318 levels also reported. The accuracy of energy and transition probabilities is estimated by comparing the MBPT and MCDF results with experimental and theoretical data. The average difference with the standard deviation with the values the are \pm 748$ cm$^{-1}$ for MBPT $-68 \pm 471$ cm$^{-1}$ which indicates the high accuracy of the two calculations. For the $n=3, 4$ levels, the absolute difference of the MBPT and MCDF energy values cm$^{-1}$, to the relative of The uncertainty of strength is assessed for each transition, and is available in Table \[table2\]. The present calculations provide a and accurate for line and purposes, can also be a benchmark for other calculations. Acknowledges the support from the National Key Research and Program of under Grant No. 2017YFA0403200, the Science Project of China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP) Grant No. TZ2016005, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11703004, No. 11674066, and No. 11474034), the Science Foundation of Province, (A2019201300 A2017201165), the Natural Foundation of Educational Department of Hebei Province, China (BJ2018058). Kai Wang his gratitude to the support from the visiting researcher program University. \ Key & CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ $E_{\rm $\Delta E$ & $\tau_{\rm $\tau_{\rm & Key $LSJ$-coupled $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ & MBPT}$& $\
 levels for the $n \leq 4$ configuraTions have bEen caLcuLatEd For O-Like. wavelengths, E1, M1, aND E2 trAnsition rates, line strenGths, aNd OScilLAtOr strEngths fOR tHE TraNsItIonS aMOnG thesE 318 leVels are Also reportEd.

THe Accuracy of enERgY levels and TraNsition probaBilIties iS eStiMAted bY coMpariNg the MbpT and McDF resultS wITh avaiLAble expERImEntaL and theoretical daTA. THE average differEnce wiTh THe STAndArd Deviation wItH the NisT valueS FoR THE leVEls are $-249 \pm 748$ cm$^{-1}$ for mBPT $-68 \pm 471$ cm$^{-1}$ whiCH inDicateS tHe hIGh accuRacy oF tHE prEsent two calCulaTions. For tHe $n=3, 4$ levELs, the avERage absOlute dIffEreNce oF ThE pResEnT mBPt AnD MCdf enErgy valuEs $296\Pm646$ Cm$^{-1}$, corRespONDINg to The AverAge reLative differeNce Of $0.001~\%\pm0.002~\%$, tHe uNcertAinty Of liNe StrenGth is aSsessEd For each transitiOn, anD is availaBle In tabLe \[Table2\]. tHe presEnt CalCulatioNs proviDE a cOnSISTeNt and accurate data sEt FOR lIne identIficatIOn AnD Modeling PuRpoSes, wHICh can Also BE cOnsidereD as a beNChMaRk for otHeR calcuLaTioNs.

ACknowLEdgeS
============

We ackNowledge The suPPort from the NatIOnal Key ResearCH aND deVElopMenT Program of CHina UNder granT no. 2017yFA0403200, THe SciEnce CHaLLeNGe Project of China AcaDeMy of EnGineeRing Physics (CAeP) under GraNT nO. TZ2016005, the NaTionAL NATural Science FoUndatIon of China (gRant No. 11703004, No. 11674066, no. 11504421, and no. 11474034), the NatUral ScienCE foundatiOn oF HeBei proVINcE, China (A2019201300 and A2017201165), anD THe NaTuRal ScieNce foundatIon Of EDucAtiOnAl DepartmEnt of HebEi prOvInCe, CHina (Bj2018058). kai Wang eXpResSeS hiS gratITude to The suPporT fRoM The VisitinG ReSEArchEr PrOgraM of fuDan UnIverSIty.

[CllrrrcCl]{}

\
Key & $LSJ$-cOupLEd CSf& $J\Pi$ &$e_{\rm MCDF}$ & $e_{\rm MBPT}$& $\Delta E$ & $\TaU_{\rm MCDF}$ & $\tau_{\Rm mBPt}$ & $jj$-couPLEd CSF$^{a,b,c}$\

\
key & $LSJ$-coupled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm McdF}$ & $E_{\rm MBpT}$& $\
 levels for the $n \leq 4$  configura tions  ha vebe en c alcu lated for O-li k e. W avelengths, E1, M1, an d E2tr a nsit i on  rate s, line st r e ngt hs ,and  o s ci llato r s trength s for thetra ns itions among th ese 318 le vel s are also r epo rted.
T hea ccura cyof en ergy l e vels a nd transi ti o n prob a bilitie s is  est imated by compari n gt he MBPT and MC DF res ul t sw i thava ilable exp er iment a l and t h eo r e t ica l  data. The av erage diffe r enc e with  t hes tandar d dev ia t ion  with the N ISTvalues fo r thel evels a r e $-249  \pm 7 48$  cm $^{- 1 }$  f orMB P T $ - 68  \p m  47 1$ cm$^{ -1 }$  whic h in d i c a testhe  hig h acc uracy of thepre sent two  calc ulati ons.  F or th e $n=3 , 4$le vels, the avera ge a bsolute d iff er enc eof th e  prese ntMBP T and M CDF ene r gyva l u e s$296\pm646$ cm$^{- 1} $ ,  c orrespon ding t o  t he averagere lat ived i ffere nceo f$0.001~\ %\pm0. 0 02 ~\ %$, The  u ncerta in tyoflines tren gth is  assesse d for each transitio n , and is avai l ab l e  i n  Tab le\[table2\].  The pres entc al cul a tions  prov id e  a consistent and accu ra te dat a set  for line ide ntificatio n a nd model ingp ur p oses, which ca n als o be consi d ered asa ben chmark f or otherc a lculatio ns. 

A ckn owl e d ge s
=========== = 
Weac knowled gethe sup por t f rom  th eNationalKey Rese ar ch  a nd  De velop m ent Prog ra m o fChi na un d er Gra nt No . 20 17 YF A 040 3200, t h eS c ienc eCh alle nge  P rojec t of Chi na Acad emy of En gin e erin gPh ysics ( CAEP) under G ra nt No. TZ2 01 600 5, the N ationalNatural Science Foundat i on of C hin a (Gr antNo. 11703 004 , No.116 7 4066,No. 11 50442 1,  an d No. 1 1 4 74 034 ),  the Natur a l  Sc ience  F ound ation o f Hebei Province,C hin a (A201920130 0 a nd A 2 0 17 201 1 65 ) , a nd the N atural ScienceFoundation  o f  E ducational Dep ar tment o f Hebei  Prov i nce, Ch ina (BJ20 18058). K ai  Wan g exp resses his  gratitu de to the suppo r tfromthe  visit in g r esear cher p r ogr am of  Fudan  U nivers ity.
[ cllrrrcc l]{}

\
Key & $LSJ$-cou pled C SF& $ J\p i$ &$E_{\ rmM CDF }$ & $E_{ \rmMBPT}$& $\ Del taE$ &$\t a u_{\r m MC D F} $ & $\tau _{\r m  MBPT}$ & $j j$- c o up led CSF$^{a , b , c}$ \

\Key & $LSJ $-co upled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF} $ &$ E _{\ rmM BPT} $&  $\
 levels_for the_$n \leq 4$ configurations_have been_calculated_for O-like._Wavelengths,_E1, M1, and_E2 transition rates,_line strengths, and oscillator_strengths for the_transitions_among these 318 levels are also reported.

The accuracy of energy levels and transition probabilities_is_estimated by_comparing_the_MBPT and MCDF results with_available experimental and theoretical data._The average_difference with the standard deviation with the NIST_values_for the levels_are $-249 \pm 748$ cm$^{-1}$ for MBPT $-68 \pm_471$ cm$^{-1}$ which indicates the high_accuracy of the_present_two_calculations. For the $n=3,_4$ levels, the average absolute difference_of the present MBPT and MCDF_energy values $296\pm646$ cm$^{-1}$, corresponding to the_average relative difference of $0.001~\%\pm0.002~\%$, The_uncertainty of line strength is_assessed for_each transition, and is available_in Table \[table2\]. The_present calculations_provide a consistent_and accurate data set for line_identification and modeling_purposes, which can also be considered_as_a benchmark for_other_calculations.

Acknowledges
============

We_acknowledge the_support from the_National_Key Research_and_Development Program of China under Grant_No. 2017YFA0403200,_the Science Challenge Project of China Academy_of Engineering Physics (CAEP)_under_Grant No. TZ2016005, the National_Natural Science Foundation of China_(Grant No. 11703004, No. 11674066, No. 11504421, and No. 11474034),_the Natural_Science Foundation_of Hebei Province, China (A2019201300 and A2017201165), and the Natural Science_Foundation of Educational Department of Hebei_Province, China (BJ2018058). Kai_Wang expresses_his_gratitude to the_support_from the_visiting researcher program of Fudan University.

[cllrrrccl]{}

\
Key &_$LSJ$-coupled CSF&_$J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$ & $E_{\rm MBPT}$&_$\Delta E$ & $\tau_{\rm_MCDF}$_& $\tau_{\rm MBPT}$ & $jj$-coupled CSF$^{a,b,c}$\

\
Key_& $LSJ$-coupled CSF& $J\pi$ &$E_{\rm MCDF}$_& $E_{\rm MBPT}$& $\