0.38$            $%    $1.04$    $0.42$   $0.85$
                                                                                                0.43$                     

             $0.63$    $0.90$    $0.71$        $0.43$    $1.97$    $0.30$        $0.76$   $\bf{7.02}$        $%    $0.60$   $0.29$
                                                                                                          0.85$           
  -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- --------- --------

  : Cloth Manufacturing data.[]{data-label="TAB:Staudte_Sheather"}

Our primary motivation for studying the alternatives of the two sample $t$-test has been the need for developing such a test in the context of examples relating to medical data. However, examples abound in practically all scientific disciplines showing that this is a real necessity which is certainly not restricted to the medical field. The example considered above is one such, where the context does not have anything directly to do with a medical problem, but the importance of the problem and the need for a robust solution can immediately be appreciated.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section \[SEC:MDPDE\] the asymptotic distribution of the minimum DPD estimators in the two sample situation is described. In Section \[SEC:Test\] we introduce our robust two sample test statistic and develop the necessary theory. A large number of real data examples and extensive simulation results are presented in Section \[SEC:numerical\]. Finally Section \[SEC:concluding\] has some concluding remarks.

The Minimum DPD Estimator: Asymptotic Distribution {#SEC:MDPDE}
==================================================

For any two probability density functions $f$ and $g$, the density power divergence measure is defined, as the function of a single tuning parameter $\beta \geq 0$, as $$d_{\beta}(g,f)=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{ll}%
\int\left\{  f^{1+\beta}(x)-\left(  1+\frac{1}{\beta}\right)  f^{\beta
}(x)g(x)+\frac{1}{\beta}g^{1+\beta}(x)\right\}  dx, & \text{for}%
\mathrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2ex]%
\int
0.38 $             $%     $ 1.04 $     $ 0.42 $    $ 0.85 $ 
                                                                                                 0.43 $                     

              $ 0.63 $     $ 0.90 $     $ 0.71 $         $ 0.43 $     $ 1.97 $     $ 0.30 $         $ 0.76 $    $ \bf{7.02}$         $%     $ 0.60 $    $ 0.29 $ 
                                                                                                           0.85 $           
   -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- --------- -------- 

  : Cloth Manufacturing data.[]{data - label="TAB: Staudte_Sheather " } 

 Our primary motivation for studying the alternatives of the two sample distribution $ t$-test has been the motivation for developing such a test in the context of exemplar refer to medical data. However, example abound in much all scientific disciplines showing that this is a real necessity which is certainly not restricted to the aesculapian field. The example considered above is one such, where the context does not have anything immediately to do with a medical trouble, but the importance of the problem and the motivation for a full-bodied solution can immediately be appreciated. 

 The rest of the paper is organize as follows: In Section \[SEC: MDPDE\ ] the asymptotic distribution of the minimal DPD estimators in the two sample distribution situation is described. In Section \[SEC: Test\ ] we introduce our robust two sample trial statistic and develop the necessary theory. A large number of real data examples and extensive simulation results are presented in Section \[SEC: numerical\ ]. Finally Section \[SEC: concluding\ ] has some concluding remarks. 

 The Minimum DPD Estimator: Asymptotic Distribution { # SEC: MDPDE } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 For any two probability density function $ f$ and $ g$, the density power discrepancy standard is defined, as the function of a single tuning argument $ \beta \geq 0 $, as $ $ d_{\beta}(g, f)=\left\ { 
 \begin{array } 
 [ c]{ll}% 
 \int\left\ {   f^{1+\beta}(x)-\left (  1+\frac{1}{\beta}\right)   f^{\beta 
 } (x)g(x)+\frac{1}{\beta}g^{1+\beta}(x)\right\ }   dx, & \text{for}% 
 \mathrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2ex]% 
 \int
0.38$            $%    $1.04$    $0.42$   $0.85$
                                                                                                0.43$                     

             $0.63$    $0.90$    $0.71$        $0.43$    $1.97$    $0.30$        $0.76$   $\bf{7.02}$        $%    $0.60$   $0.29$
                                                                                                          0.85$           
  -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- --------- --------

  : Cloth Manufacturing datw.[]{datw-label="TAB:Staudte_Shfather"}

Our ptjmawt motivation for studypug the altetnatives of the two sample $t$-test has yeen the negb fog developing such a test in tmv conteft of ecamples relatikg to meeical data. However, exemples abound in prastically dlm scientific discupoines shofing rhag tgix js a rfal necessity which is cwrtainly not restrivtqe to the medidal fiqlq. The example considered above is one slch, shere the context does bot have anything dirgctly to dj with a medical problem, but the importance of tha prouldm ckq rhf need for a robust solution can immediately fs spireciated.

The rest of the paprr ix organized as folloca: Jn Section \[SEC:MDPDF\] the afymptitic distwibuyion of the minimum DPD estumators in tke rwo sample situatiln is descrnbed. Im Secyion \[SEC:Test\] we introduee our robust two sample tsrt statistic and denelo[ the necessary theory. A lwrge numbxr of real dxta gxamplef and extejsive simulation results are kresended in Sechion \[SEC:numerical\]. Finally Section \[SEC:concludimg\] hav some cjnclucing remarks.

Tre Minimum DPD Estimacor: Ashmptotic Dpstributimn {#SEC:MDPDE}
==================================================

Sor any two pslbability deisity funstiobs $f$ and $g$, gfe density powrr divergvnee measurw is defined, as thc funzfion of a singlz uubing parameter $\bega \dee 0$, af $$d_{\beta}(g,f)=\left\{
\tegiv{arfsy}
[c]{ll}%
\knt\left\{  f^{1+\bcta}(b)-\lefy(  1+\frac{1}{\beta}\right)  f^{\bata
}(x)f(x)+\frac{1}{\beta}g^{1+\beta}(x)\ribhb\}  dx, & \tezt{for}%
\matrrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2ex]%
\int
0.38$ $% $1.04$ $0.42$ $0.85$ 0.43$ $0.63$ $0.43$ $0.30$ $0.76$ $% $0.60$ $0.29$ ------------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- -------- : Manufacturing data.[]{data-label="TAB:Staudte_Sheather"} Our primary motivation for the alternatives of the two sample $t$-test has been the need for developing a test in the context of examples relating to medical data. However, examples in all disciplines that this is a real necessity which is certainly not restricted to the medical field. The considered above is one such, where the context not have anything directly do with a medical problem, the of the and need a robust solution immediately be appreciated. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section \[SEC:MDPDE\] the asymptotic of the estimators in two situation described. In Section introduce our robust two sample test the necessary theory. A large number of real examples and simulation results are presented in Section Finally Section \[SEC:concluding\] has some concluding remarks. The DPD Estimator: Asymptotic Distribution {#SEC:MDPDE} ================================================== For any two probability density functions $f$ and $g$, power divergence measure is as the function a tuning $\beta 0$, as \begin{array} [c]{ll}% \int\left\{ f^{1+\beta}(x)-\left( 1+\frac{1}{\beta}\right) f^{\beta }(x)g(x)+\frac{1}{\beta}g^{1+\beta}(x)\right\} dx, & \text{for}% \mathrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2ex]%
0.38$            $%    $1.04$    $0.42$   $0.85$
                                                                                                0.43$                     

             $0.63$    $0.90$    $0.71$        $0.43$    $1.97$    $0.30$        $0.76$   $\bf{7.02}$        $%    $0.60$   $0.29$
                                                                                                          0.85$           
  -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- --------- --------

  : Cloth Manufacturing data.[]{dAta-label="TAb:StauDte_sheAtHer"}

OUr prImary motivatioN For sTudying the alternatives Of the TwO SampLE $t$-Test hAs been tHE nEED foR dEvEloPiNG sUch a tEst In the coNtext of exaMplEs Relating to meDIcAl data. HoweVer, Examples abouNd iN practIcAllY All scIenTific DiscipLInes shOwing that ThIS is a reAL necessITY wHich Is certainly not resTRiCTed to the medicaL field. thE ExAMPle ConSidered aboVe Is one SUch, wherE ThE CONteXT does not have aNything direCTly To do wiTh A meDIcal prOblem, BuT The Importance oF the Problem anD the neED for a roBUst soluTion caN imMedIateLY bE aPprEcIAteD.

thE reST of The paper Is OrGanizEd as FOLLOws: IN SeCtioN \[SEC:MdPDE\] the asymptOtiC disTRibUtion Of the MiniMuM DPD eStimatOrs in ThE two sample situaTion Is describEd. IN SEctIoN \[SEC:TESt\] we inTroDucE our robUst two sAMplE tEST StAtistic and develop tHe NECeSsary theOry. A laRGe NuMBer of reaL dAta ExamPLEs and ExteNSiVe simulaTion reSUlTs Are presEnTed in SEcTioN \[SEc:numeRIcal\]. finallY Section \[sEC:coNCluding\] has some COncluding remaRKs.

tHE MINimuM DPd Estimator: ASympTOtic distRIbUtiON {#SEC:MdPDE}
==================================================

FOr ANy TWo probability densitY fUnctioNs $f$ anD $g$, the density pOwer divergENCE measure Is deFInED, as the function Of a siNgle tuning PArameter $\Beta \gEq 0$, as $$d_{\betA}(g,f)=\left\{
\beGIN{array}
[c]{lL}%
\inT\leFt\{  f^{1+\BetA}(X)-\LeFt(  1+\frac{1}{\beta}\rigHT)  F^{\betA
}(x)G(x)+\frac{1}{\bEta}G^{1+\beta}(x)\rIghT\}  dx, & \TexT{foR}%
\mAthrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2Ex]%
\int
0.38$            $%    $1. 04$    $0. 42$  $0 .85 $                                                                       0.43$                   
            $ 0 .6 3$    $0.9 0$   $0.71$      $0.4 3$   $1.97 $   $0. 30$      $0 .76$   $\ bf { 7.02}$       $ %    $0 .60$   $0.29$
                                                                             0.8 5$         
  - -- - --- - ------------ ----- --- ------ ------- - ----- - ------ ----- ---- - --- --- -- - --- - ---- - --- ------ - -- -- -------- - - - - - -- --- ---
  :Cloth Manufac tur ingd ata .[]{d ata-l abel =" TAB:S taudte _Shea th er"}

Our prima ry m otivation  fo rstu dy ing t h e alte rna tiv es of t he twos amp le $ t $- test has been thene e d  f or devel opings uc ha  test in  t hecont e x t ofexam p le s relati ng tom ed ic al data .Howeve r,  ex amp les a b ound  in pr acticall y all scientific dis c iplines showi n gt h at this  is  a real nec essi t y wh ichi scer t ainly  notre s tr i cted to the medical  f ield.The e xample consid ered above i s  one suc h, w h er e  the context d oes n ot have an y thing di rectl y to dowith a me d i cal prob lem , b utthe i mp ortance of th e prob le m and t heneed fo r a  ro bus t s ol ution can  immedia te ly  b eapp recia t ed.

The  r est  o f t he pa p er isorgan ized  a sf oll ows: In Se c t ion\[ SE C:MD PDE \]  theasym p tot ic dist ributionoft he m in im um DPDestimators in  t he two sam pl e s ituati o n  is desc ribed. In Section \[SEC : Test\]weintro duce  our robu sttwo sa mpl e  teststatis tic a nd  de v e lop t h e  n ece ss ary theory . A l argenu mber  of rea l data examples an d  ex tensive simul ati on r e s ul tsa re pre se n ted i n Section \[SEC :numerical \] .  F inally Sec t ion  \ [SEC:co ncludin g\] h a s someconcludin g remarks .
The M ini mum DPD Es timator:  Asymptot i c Dis t ri butio n { #SEC:M DP DE} 
==== ====== = === ===== ====== == ====== ===== == ======== ==

For any two probabi lity d ensit y f unctions$f$ and  $g$, the  den sity power  di ver gence  me a sureis d e fi ned ,  as t he f u nction of asin g l etuning para m e t er$\bet a \ g eq 0$,  as$$d_{\beta}(g,f)= \ left\{
\begin{ arra y } 
[c ]{l l }%
\ in t\left\{  f^{1 +\b et a } (x)-\lef t(   1+\frac{1 }{\beta} \r i ght) f^{\b eta
}( x)g(x)+ \ f ra c {1}{\b eta} g^{ 1+\beta}( x)\ ri g ht\}  d x,  & \text{ for} %\mathr m{~}\b e ta>0 , \ \[2ex]%
\int
0.38$ _ _   _ __ $%__  $1.04$_  _$0.42$   $0.85$
_  __             __ ___    _    _ _       __  _        _     _  ___   _     _     _      _     0.43$_    _ _    _  _ _  _

     _  _    $0.63$ __ $0.90$ ___$0.71$ _  __ _$0.43$_   $1.97$  __$0.30$      _ $0.76$  _$\bf{7.02}$_   _   $% _  $0.60$   $0.29$
_ _ _          _     _   _ __  __ _      _ _     _   __     _     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __   0.85$  ___    _ 
  -------- -------- ---------_--------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------- --------- --------

_ : Cloth_Manufacturing data.[]{data-label="TAB:Staudte_Sheather"}

Our primary motivation for_studying_the_alternatives of the two sample $t$-test has been the need_for developing_such a test_in the context of examples relating to medical data. However,_examples abound in practically all scientific disciplines_showing that this is a real necessity which is certainly not_restricted to the medical field. The example considered_above is one such, where the context_does not have anything_directly_to do with a medical problem, but_the_importance_of_the problem and_the need for_a robust solution_can immediately_be appreciated.

The rest_of the_paper is organized_as_follows: In Section \[SEC:MDPDE\] the asymptotic distribution of the minimum DPD estimators in the two sample situation is_described. In Section \[SEC:Test\] we introduce_our robust two sample test_statistic_and develop the_necessary theory. A large_number of real data examples and extensive simulation_results are presented in Section \[SEC:numerical\]. Finally Section \[SEC:concluding\]_has_some concluding_remarks.

The Minimum DPD Estimator:_Asymptotic Distribution_{#SEC:MDPDE}
==================================================

For any_two probability density_functions $f$_and $g$,_the density_power divergence measure is defined, as the_function_of a single tuning parameter $\beta \geq 0$, as_$$d_{\beta}(g,f)=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{ll}%
\int\left\{__f^{1+\beta}(x)-\left(_ 1+\frac{1}{\beta}\right) _f^{\beta
}(x)g(x)+\frac{1}{\beta}g^{1+\beta}(x)\right\}  dx,_& \text{for}%
\mathrm{~}\beta>0,\\[2ex]%
\int