}
\dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0.
\end{aligned}$$ Then, we obtain that $\|e_i(t)\|\leq \psi(t-t_k^i)$, where $\psi(t)$ is the analytical solution to, given by $\psi(t)=\frac{c\sigma_i}{\|A\|}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)$.

On the other hand, the triggering function satisfies $f_i(t)\leq 0$, if we have the following condition: $$\label{condition}
\begin {aligned}
\|e_i\|^2\leq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2}.
\end{aligned}$$ Then, the interval between two triggering instants $t_k^i$ and $t_{k+1}^i$ for agent $v_i$ can be lower bounded by the time for $\psi^2(t-t_k^i)$ evolving from 0 to the right hand of. Thus, a lower bound of $t_{k+1}^i-t_k^i$, denoted as $\tau_k^i$, can be obtained by solving the following inequality $$\frac{c^2\sigma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)^2\geq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2},$$ from which, we have that $$\label{lowerbound}
\begin {aligned}
\tau_k^i\geq \frac{1}{\|A\|}\mathrm{ln}\left(1+\frac{\|A\|}{c\sigma_i\|G\|}\sqrt{\frac{\mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i+\tau_k^i)}}{d_i(t)}}\right).
\end{aligned}$$

ii\) In the second case, $t_k^i$ is determined by the switch of the topology, while $t_{k+1}^i$ is determined by the triggering function. Since the measurement error $e_i$ is reset to zero at $t_k^i$, this case is similar to the first case and the details are omitted here
} 
 \dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0. 
 \end{aligned}$$ Then, we obtain that $ \|e_i(t)\|\leq \psi(t - t_k^i)$, where $ \psi(t)$ is the analytical solution to, given by $ \psi(t)=\frac{c\sigma_i}{\|A\|}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)$. 

 On the other bridge player, the trip function satisfies $ f_i(t)\leq 0 $, if we have the following condition: $ $ \label{condition } 
 \begin { align } 
 \|e_i\|^2\leq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2 }. 
 \end{aligned}$$ Then, the interval between two triggering moment $ t_k^i$ and $ t_{k+1}^i$ for agentive role $ v_i$ can be lower bounded by the time for $ \psi^2(t - t_k^i)$ evolving from 0 to the right hand of. therefore, a lower bound of $ t_{k+1}^i - t_k^i$, denoted as $ \tau_k^i$, can be obtained by solving the follow inequality $ $ \frac{c^2\sigma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)^2\geq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2},$$ from which, we have that $ $ \label{lowerbound } 
 \begin { aligned } 
 \tau_k^i\geq \frac{1}{\|A\|}\mathrm{ln}\left(1+\frac{\|A\|}{c\sigma_i\|G\|}\sqrt{\frac{\mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i+\tau_k^i)}}{d_i(t)}}\right). 
 \end{aligned}$$ 

 ii\) In the second case, $ t_k^i$ is determined by the switch of the regional anatomy, while $ t_{k+1}^i$ is determined by the triggering function. Since the measurement error $ e_i$ is reset to zero at $ t_k^i$, this lawsuit is similar to the first font and the details are exclude here
}
\dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0.
\ekd{aligned}$$ Then, wg ibtain that $\|s_i(t)\|\leq \pri(t-t_k^i)$, where $\psi(t)$ is the anapyrical solution to, given by $\osi(t)=\frac{c\digma_i}{\|A\|}\lwft(e^{\|E\|t}-1\right)$.

On the otisr hand, the tdlggernnj function satixfies $f_i(t)\laq 0$, if we have tfe following condition: $$\label{condition}
\fegin {akihned}
\|e_i\|^2\leq \frac{\iu e^{-\mt t}}{d_j(n)\|G\|^2}.
\tnd{aligned}$$ Then, the interval betwsen two triggering imstants $t_k^i$ and $t_{k+1}^i$ for agfnt $g_i$ can be lower boknded by thg tiiw for $\psi^2(t-t_k^k)$ evolving from 0 to thg right hand of. Thus, a lower bouvd of $t_{k+1}^i-t_k^i$, debored ds $\tau_k^i$, cai be oftained by solving tve follpwing inequaliby $$\frec{c^2\sugma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)^2\geq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2},$$ srom whicv, ce have that $$\label{lowwrvound}
\tegit {alktnea}
\tah_k^m\ges \frac{1}{\|W\|}\mavhrm{ln}\left(1+\fdac{\|A\|}{c\sigma_i\|T\|}\sqrt{\frac{\mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i+\uau_h^p)}}{c_i(t)}}\right).
\end{amigned}$$

yi\) In the second case, $t_k^i$ is determined bj ths switch of the topologt, while $t_{k+1}^i$ is determlned by tre triggering function. Since the measurement erros $e_i$ ms reweb to zego at $t_k^i$, this case is similar to the first cwae akd the details ave omitted here
} \dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0. \end{aligned}$$ Then, we obtain \psi(t-t_k^i)$, $\psi(t)$ is analytical solution to, other the triggering function $f_i(t)\leq 0$, if have the following condition: $$\label{condition} \begin \|e_i\|^2\leq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2}. \end{aligned}$$ Then, the interval between two triggering instants $t_k^i$ $t_{k+1}^i$ for agent $v_i$ can be lower bounded by the time for $\psi^2(t-t_k^i)$ from to right of. Thus, a lower bound of $t_{k+1}^i-t_k^i$, denoted as $\tau_k^i$, can be obtained by solving the inequality $$\frac{c^2\sigma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)^2\geq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2},$$ from which, we that $$\label{lowerbound} \begin {aligned} \frac{1}{\|A\|}\mathrm{ln}\left(1+\frac{\|A\|}{c\sigma_i\|G\|}\sqrt{\frac{\mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i+\tau_k^i)}}{d_i(t)}}\right). \end{aligned}$$ ii\) the case, $t_k^i$ determined the of the topology, $t_{k+1}^i$ is determined by the triggering function. Since the measurement error $e_i$ is reset to zero at this case to the case the are omitted here
}
\dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0.
\End{aligned}$$ then, wE obTaiN tHat $\|e_I(t)\|\leQ \psi(t-t_k^i)$, where $\pSI(t)$ is The analytical solution tO, giveN bY $\Psi(t)=\FRaC{c\sigMa_i}{\|A\|}\lefT(E^{\|A\|T}-1\RIghT)$.

ON tHe oThER hAnd, thE trIggerinG function sAtiSfIes $f_i(t)\leq 0$, if wE HaVe the folloWinG condition: $$\laBel{ConditIoN}
\beGIn {aliGneD}
\|e_i\|^2\leQ \frac{\mU E^{-\nu t}}{d_i(T)\|G\|^2}.
\end{aligNeD}$$ then, thE IntervaL BEtWeen Two triggering instANtS $T_k^i$ and $t_{k+1}^i$ for agEnt $v_i$ cAn BE lOWEr bOunDed by the tiMe For $\psI^2(T-t_k^i)$ evoLViNG FRom 0 TO the right hand Of. Thus, a loweR BouNd of $t_{k+1}^I-t_K^i$, dENoted aS $\tau_k^I$, cAN be Obtained by sOlviNg the follOwing iNEqualitY $$\Frac{c^2\siGma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\lEft(E^{\|A\|t}-1\RighT)^2\GeQ \fRac{\Mu E^{-\Nu t}}{D_I(t)\|g\|^2},$$ frOM whIch, we havE tHaT $$\labeL{lowERBOUnd}
\bEgiN {aliGned}
\tAu_k^i\geq \frac{1}{\|A\|}\mAthRm{ln}\LEft(1+\Frac{\|A\|}{C\sigmA_i\|G\|}\sQrT{\frac{\Mu e^{-\nu (t_K^i+\tau_K^i)}}{D_i(t)}}\right).
\end{aligNed}$$

iI\) In the secOnd CaSe, $t_K^i$ Is detERmined By tHe sWitch of The topoLOgy, WhILE $T_{k+1}^I$ is determined by the TrIGGeRing funcTion. SiNCe ThE MeasuremEnT erRor $e_I$ IS reseT to zERo At $t_k^i$, thiS case iS SiMiLar to thE fIrst caSe And The DetaiLS are OmitteD here
}
\dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\si gma_i,~\ps i(0)= \|e _i( t_ k^i) \|=0 .
\end{aligned } $$ T hen, we obtain that $\ |e_i( t) \ |\le q  \ psi(t -t_k^i) $ ,w h ere  $ \p si( t) $  i s the  an alytica l solution  to ,given by $\p s i( t)=\frac{c \si gma_i}{\|A\| }\l eft(e^ {\ |A\ | t}-1\ rig ht)$. 

On t h e othe r hand, t he trigge r ing fun c t io n sa tisfies $f_i(t)\l e q0 $, if we havethe fo ll o wi n g  co ndi tion: $$\l ab el{co n dition} \b e g i n { a ligned}
\|e_i \|^2\leq \f r ac{ \mu e^ {- \nu t}}{d_ i(t)\ |G \ |^2 }.
\end{ali gned }$$ Then,  the i n tervalb etweentwo tr igg eri ng i n st an ts$t _ k^i $  a nd$ t_{ k+1}^i$fo ragent  $v_ i $ c an b e l ower  boun ded by the ti mefor$ \ps i^2(t -t_k^ i)$ev olvin g from  0 to  t he right hand o f. T hus, a lo wer  b oun dof $t _ {k+1}^ i-t _k^ i$, den oted as $\t au _ k ^ i$ , can be obtainedby s ol ving the  follo w in gi nequalit y$$\ frac { c ^2\si gma_ i ^2 }{\|A\|^ 2}\lef t (e ^{ \|A\|t} -1 \right )^ 2\g eq\frac { \mue^{-\n u t}}{d_ i(t)\ | G\|^2},$$ from which, we hav e  t h a t$ $\la bel {lowerbound }
\b e gin{ali g ne d}\ tau_k ^i\ge q\ fr a c{1}{\|A\|}\mathrm{ ln }\left (1+\f rac{\|A\|}{c\ sigma_i\|G \ | } \sqrt{\f rac{ \ mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i +\tau _k^i)}}{d_ i (t)}}\ri ght). 
\end{al igned}$$i i\) In t hesec ond  ca s e ,$t_k^i$ is de t e rmin ed  by the  sw itch of  th e t opo log y,  while $t _{k+1}^i $is  d et erm inedb y the tr ig ger in g f uncti o n. Sin ce th e me as ur e men t error $e _ i $ is  r es et t o z er o at$t_k ^ i$,  this c ase is si mil a r to  t he  firstcase and thede tails areom itt ed her e 
}
\dot \psi=\|A\|\psi+c\sigma_i,~\psi(0)=\|e_i(t_k^i)\|=0.
\end{aligned}$$_Then, we_obtain that $\|e_i(t)\|\leq \psi(t-t_k^i)$,_where $\psi(t)$_is_the analytical_solution_to, given by_$\psi(t)=\frac{c\sigma_i}{\|A\|}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)$.

On the other_hand, the triggering function_satisfies $f_i(t)\leq 0$,_if_we have the following condition: $$\label{condition}
\begin {aligned}
\|e_i\|^2\leq \frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2}.
\end{aligned}$$ Then, the interval between_two_triggering instants_$t_k^i$_and_$t_{k+1}^i$ for agent $v_i$ can_be lower bounded by the_time for_$\psi^2(t-t_k^i)$ evolving from 0 to the right hand_of._Thus, a lower_bound of $t_{k+1}^i-t_k^i$, denoted as $\tau_k^i$, can be obtained_by solving the following inequality $$\frac{c^2\sigma_i^2}{\|A\|^2}\left(e^{\|A\|t}-1\right)^2\geq_\frac{\mu e^{-\nu t}}{d_i(t)\|G\|^2},$$_from_which,_we have that $$\label{lowerbound}
\begin_{aligned}
\tau_k^i\geq \frac{1}{\|A\|}\mathrm{ln}\left(1+\frac{\|A\|}{c\sigma_i\|G\|}\sqrt{\frac{\mu e^{-\nu (t_k^i+\tau_k^i)}}{d_i(t)}}\right).
\end{aligned}$$

ii\) In the_second case, $t_k^i$ is determined by_the switch of the topology, while $t_{k+1}^i$_is determined by the triggering function._Since the measurement error $e_i$_is reset_to zero at $t_k^i$, this_case is similar_to the_first case and_the details are omitted here