_{k l i' j'} + h_{i k i' j'} h_{j l i' j'} + h_{i l i' j'} h_{j k i' j'}
\right)\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$

And write the final result of the mass correction leading scalar contributions $$\begin{aligned}
\texttt{1-loop correction} &=& - \frac{\Lambda ^2}{16 \pi^2} \frac{1}{2} h_{i i i' i'}  \label{result_1loop} \\
\texttt{2-loop correction} &=&  - \frac{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2} \Lambda ^2 \log  \left( \frac{\Lambda^2}{m^2} \right)
\frac{1}{4} \left( 
h_{i j i' j'} h_{i' j' k' k'} + 2 h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'}
\right) \nonumber\\
& & + 
\frac{\Lambda ^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2} \frac{1}{3}  h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'} \label{2_loop_scalar_coefficent}\end{aligned}$$

One can neglect the result proportional to the $\frac{\Lambda ^2 h^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2}$ as small in comparison to the 1-loop term[^3].

Alternatively, one can obtain the leading higher order quadratic divergences indirectly, with some help of beta functions. Following [@einhorn], in a theory with many couplings $\lambda_{i}$ the leading (containing the highest power of $\log  (\Lambda)$ ) quadratic divergences can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\delta m^2 = \Lambda^2 \sum_{n = 0} ^{\infty} f_{n} (\lambda_{i}) \log ^{n} \left( \frac{\Lambda}{\mu}\right) + \ldots
\label{einhorn_eq}\end{aligned}$$ where $n+1$ is the number of loops considered, $\mu$ is the renormalization scale and the coefficients $f_{n}$ satisfy $$\begin{aligned}
(n+1)f_{n+1} = \
_ { k l i' j' } + h_{i k i' j' } h_{j l i' j' } + h_{i l i' j' } h_{j k i' j' } 
 \right)\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ 

 And spell the concluding result of the mass discipline leading scalar contribution $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \texttt{1 - loop discipline } & = & - \frac{\Lambda ^2}{16 \pi^2 } \frac{1}{2 } h_{i i i' i' }   \label{result_1loop } \\ 
 \texttt{2 - loop correction } & = &   - \frac{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2 } \Lambda ^2 \log   \left (\frac{\Lambda^2}{m^2 } \right) 
 \frac{1}{4 } \left (
 h_{i j i' j' } h_{i' j' k' kelvin' } + 2 h_{i i' j' k' } h_{j i' j' k' } 
 \right) \nonumber\\ 
 & & + 
 \frac{\Lambda ^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2 } \frac{1}{3 }   h_{i i' j' kilobyte' } h_{j i' j' k' } \label{2_loop_scalar_coefficent}\end{aligned}$$ 

 One can neglect the solution proportional to the $ \frac{\Lambda ^2 h^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2}$ equally small in comparison to the 1 - loop term[^3 ]. 

 Alternatively, one can receive the leading higher ordering quadratic divergences indirectly, with some help of beta functions. be [ @einhorn ], in a theory with many couplings $ \lambda_{i}$ the leading (containing the high power of $ \log   (\Lambda)$) quadratic divergences can be written as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \delta m^2 = \Lambda^2 \sum_{n = 0 } ^{\infty } f_{n } (\lambda_{i }) \log ^{n } \left (\frac{\Lambda}{\mu}\right) + \ldots 
 \label{einhorn_eq}\end{aligned}$$ where $ n+1 $ is the number of loops study, $ \mu$ is the renormalization scale and the coefficients $ f_{n}$ satisfy $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 (n+1)f_{n+1 } = \
_{k l i' j'} + h_{i k i' j'} h_{j l i' j'} + h_{i l i' j'} h_{j k n' j'}
\righv)\nonumbsr\\\end{aliened}$$

And write the final resupt of tye mass correction leaaing scalwr contrubutmons $$\begin{alignev}
\fexttt{1-loop codvectimi} &=& - \frac{\Lambda ^2}{16 \pi^2} \frac{1}{2} h_{h i i' i'}  \label{serupt_1loop} \\
\texttt{2-loop correction} &=&  - \fras{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2} \Lakbfa ^2 \log  \left( \srac{\Kwmbdz^2}{m^2} \right)
\frac{1}{4} \left( 
h_{i j i' j'} h_{i' j' k' i'} + 2 h_{i p' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'}
\rignt) \nonumber\\
& & + 
\frac{\Lambda ^2}{(16 \oi ^2)^2} \vrac{1}{3}  h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j l' j' k'} \label{2_ooop_fxalar_coefficdnt}\end{aligned}$$

One can ngglect the result proportional tu the $\frac{\Lambdq ^2 h^2}{(16 \oh ^2)^2}$ as small in cjmparison to the 1-loo[ term[^3].

Akternatively, oke cai obrain the leading highxr order quadratic dyvergencev nndirectly, with some yeop of betd fuvxtiuns. Fplmowing [@eiihorn], in a fheory with many couplings $\lamndw_{p}$ the leading (contaynyng the highest power of $\log  (\Lambda)$ ) qladrztic divergences can be written as $$\begin{aligjed}
\delta i^2 = \Lambda^2 \sum_{n = 0} ^{\infty} f_{n} (\lambda_{i}) \log ^{n} \left( \frac{\Nambde}{\mj}\riymb) + \laitd
\label{einhorn_eq}\end{aligned}$$ where $n+1$ is the numbqd pf loops consideved, $\mu$ is the renotmwloeation scale avd the cosfficients $f_{n}$ satidfy $$\begyn{alitned}
(n+1)f_{n+1} = \
_{k l i' j'} + h_{i k h_{j i' j'} h_{i l i' \right)\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ write the final of the mass leading scalar contributions $$\begin{aligned} \texttt{1-loop correction} - \frac{\Lambda ^2}{16 \pi^2} \frac{1}{2} h_{i i i' i'} \label{result_1loop} \\ \texttt{2-loop correction} - \frac{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2} \Lambda ^2 \log \left( \frac{\Lambda^2}{m^2} \right) \frac{1}{4} \left( h_{i j j'} j' k'} 2 h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'} \right) \nonumber\\ & & + \frac{\Lambda ^2}{(16 ^2)^2} \frac{1}{3} h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' k'} \label{2_loop_scalar_coefficent}\end{aligned}$$ One can the result proportional to the ^2 \pi ^2)^2}$ small comparison the 1-loop term[^3]. one can obtain the leading higher order quadratic divergences indirectly, with some help of beta functions. Following in a many couplings the (containing highest power of ) quadratic divergences can be written m^2 = \Lambda^2 \sum_{n = 0} ^{\infty} f_{n} \log ^{n} \frac{\Lambda}{\mu}\right) + \ldots \label{einhorn_eq}\end{aligned}$$ where $n+1$ the number of loops considered, $\mu$ is the scale and the coefficients $f_{n}$ satisfy $$\begin{aligned} (n+1)f_{n+1} = \
_{k l i' j'} + h_{i k i' j'} h_{j l i' j'} + h_{i l i' j'} h_{j k i' j'}
\rIght)\nonumbEr\\\end{AliGneD}$$

ANd wrIte tHe final result oF The mAss correction leading scAlar cOnTRibuTIoNs $$\begIn{alignED}
\tEXTtt{1-LoOp CorReCTiOn} &=& - \fraC{\LaMbda ^2}{16 \pi^2} \fRac{1}{2} h_{i i i' i'}  \laBel{ReSult_1loop} \\
\textTT{2-lOop correctIon} &=&  - \Frac{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2} \Lambda ^2 \Log  \Left( \frAc{\lamBDa^2}{m^2} \riGht)
\Frac{1}{4} \lEft( 
h_{i j I' J'} h_{i' j' k' k'} + 2 H_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' K'}
\rIGht) \nonUMber\\
& & + 
\fraC{\lAmBda ^2}{(16 \pI ^2)^2} \frac{1}{3}  h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'} \laBEl{2_LOop_scalar_coeffIcent}\eNd{ALiGNEd}$$

ONe cAn neglect tHe ResulT ProportIOnAL TO thE $\Frac{\Lambda ^2 h^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2}$ As small in coMParIson to ThE 1-loOP term[^3].

ALternAtIVelY, one can obtaIn thE leading hIgher oRDer quadRAtic divErgencEs iNdiRectLY, wItH soMe HElp OF bEta FUncTions. FolLoWiNg [@einHorn], IN A THeorY wiTh maNy couPlings $\lambda_{i}$ The LeadINg (cOntaiNing tHe hiGhEst poWer of $\lOg  (\LamBdA)$ ) quadratic diverGencEs can be wrIttEn As $$\bEgIn{aliGNed}
\delTa m^2 = \lamBda^2 \sum_{n = 0} ^{\Infty} f_{n} (\LAmbDa_{I}) \LOG ^{n} \Left( \frac{\Lambda}{\mu}\riGhT) + \LDoTs
\label{eInhorn_EQ}\eNd{ALigned}$$ whErE $n+1$ iS the NUMber oF looPS cOnsidereD, $\mu$ is tHE rEnOrmalizAtIon scaLe And The CoeffICienTs $f_{n}$ saTisfy $$\begIn{aliGNed}
(n+1)f_{n+1} = \
_{k l i' j'} + h_{i k i' j '} h_{j li' j' } +  h_ {i  l i ' j' } h_{j k i' j' } 
\ri ght)\nonumber\\\end{al igned }$ $ 

An d  w ritethe fin a lr e sul tof  th em as s cor rec tion le ading scal arco ntributions$ $\ begin{alig ned }
\texttt{1- loo p corr ec tio n } &=&  -\frac {\Lamb d a ^2}{ 16 \pi^2}  \ f rac{1} { 2} h_{i i  i ' i' }  \label{result_ 1 lo o p} \\
\texttt{ 2-loop  c o rr e c tio n}&=&  - \fr ac {1}{( 1 6 \pi^2 ) ^2 } \ Lam b da ^2 \log  \ left( \frac { \La mbda^2 }{ m^2 }  \righ t)
\f ra c {1} {4} \left(
h_{ i j i' j' } h_{i '  j' k'k '} + 2h_{i i ' j ' k '} h _ {j  i ' j 'k '}\ ri ght )  \n onumber\ \&& + \fra c { \ L ambd a ^ 2}{( 16 \p i ^2)^2} \fra c{1 }{3}  h_ {i i'  j' k '} h _{ j i'j' k'}  \lab el {2_loop_scalar_ coef ficent}\e nd{ al ign ed }$$
O ne can  ne gle ct theresultp rop or t i o na l to the $\frac{\L am b d a^2 h^2}{ (16 \p i  ^ 2) ^ 2}$ as s ma llin c o m paris on t o  t he 1-loo p term [ ^3 ]. 

Alter na tively ,one  ca n obt a in t he lea ding hig her o r der quadraticd ivergences in d ir e c tl y , wi thsome help o f be t a fu ncti o ns . F o llowi ng [@ ei n ho r n], in a theory wit hmany c oupli ngs $\lambda_ {i}$ the l e a d ing (con tain i ng the highest po wer o f $\log  ( \ Lambda)$  ) qu adraticdivergenc e s  can bewri tte n a s $ $ \ be gin{aligned}\ d elta  m ^2 = \L amb da^2 \s um_ {n= 0 } ^ {\ infty} f_ {n} (\la mb da _{ i} ) \ log ^ { n} \left (\fr ac {\L ambda } {\mu}\ right ) +\l do t s
\ label{e i nh o r n_eq }\ en d{al ign ed }$$ w here $n+ 1$ is t he number  of loop sco nsidere d, $\mu$ is t he  renormali za tio n scal e and thecoefficients $f_{n}$ sa t isfy $$ \be gin{a lign ed}
(n+1) f_{ n+1} =  \
_{k l_i' j'}_+ h_{i k i'_j'} h_{j_l_i' j'}_+_h_{i l i'_j'} h_{j k_i' j'}
\right)\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$

And write the_final result of_the_mass correction leading scalar contributions $$\begin{aligned}
\texttt{1-loop correction} &=& - \frac{\Lambda ^2}{16 \pi^2} \frac{1}{2} h_{i_i_i' i'}__\label{result_1loop}_\\
\texttt{2-loop correction} &=&  -_\frac{1}{(16 \pi^2)^2} \Lambda ^2 \log_ \left(_\frac{\Lambda^2}{m^2} \right)
\frac{1}{4} \left( 
h_{i j i' j'} h_{i'_j'_k' k'} +_2 h_{i i' j' k'} h_{j i' j' k'}
\right)_\nonumber\\
& & + 
\frac{\Lambda ^2}{(16 \pi_^2)^2} \frac{1}{3} _h_{i_i'_j' k'} h_{j i'_j' k'} \label{2_loop_scalar_coefficent}\end{aligned}$$

One can neglect the_result proportional to the $\frac{\Lambda ^2_h^2}{(16 \pi ^2)^2}$ as small in comparison_to the 1-loop term[^3].

Alternatively, one can_obtain the leading higher order_quadratic divergences_indirectly, with some help of_beta functions. Following_[@einhorn], in_a theory with_many couplings $\lambda_{i}$ the leading (containing_the highest power_of $\log  (\Lambda)$ ) quadratic_divergences_can be written_as_$$\begin{aligned}
\delta_m^2 =_\Lambda^2 \sum_{n =_0}_^{\infty} f_{n}_(\lambda_{i})_\log ^{n} \left( \frac{\Lambda}{\mu}\right) + \ldots
\label{einhorn_eq}\end{aligned}$$_where_$n+1$ is the number of loops considered,_$\mu$ is the renormalization_scale_and the coefficients $f_{n}$_satisfy $$\begin{aligned}
(n+1)f_{n+1} = \