 $10^{-2} > S \geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7 % for $10^{-3} > S \geq 10^{-4}$; 18 % for $10^{-4} > S \geq 10^{-5}$, and 35 % for $10^{-5} > S \geq 10^{-6}$. Then, the larger of $\delta S_{ij}$ and $\delta S_{av}$ is accepted as the uncertainty of each particular line strength. About 1.4 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 2 % (the category A+), 1.0 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 3 % (the category A), 20.0 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 7 % (the category B+), 23.3 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 10 % (the category B), 8.9 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 18 % (the category C+), 19.6 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 25 % (the category C), and 13.5 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 40 % (the category D+), while 12.3 % have uncertainties of $>$ 40 % (categories D and E).

Again, using the method suggested in [@Kramida.2014.V2.p22; @Kramida.2014.V212.p11], the uncertainties of the $S$ values for M1 and E2 transitions are estimated. The estimated uncertainties for all E1, M1, and E2 transitions with BF $\geq 10^{-5}$ are listed in Table \[table2\].

Our MBPT and MCDF lifetimes for the lowest 318 levels of the $n \leq 4$ configurations in O-like, which are calculated by considering all possible E1, M1, and E2 transitions, are listed in Table \[table1\]. For the lowest 10 levels of the $n = 2$ complex, the MCDF lifetimes agree very well with the MBPT results, and the differences are within 3 %. For the remaining 308 levels belonging to the $n = 3$ and $n = 4$ configurations, the average difference with the standard deviation $0.5~\% \pm 4.2~\%$.

Conclusions
===========

Employing two state-of-the-art methods (MBPT and MCDF), excitation energies and lifetimes of the lowest 318
$ 10^{-2 } > S \geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7  % for $ 10^{-3 } > S \geq 10^{-4}$; 18  % for $ 10^{-4 } > S \geq 10^{-5}$, and 35  % for $ 10^{-5 } > S \geq 10^{-6}$. Then, the larger of $ \delta S_{ij}$ and $ \delta S_{av}$ is accepted as the uncertainty of each particular course forte. About 1.4  % have uncertainties of $ \leq$ 2  % (the class A+), 1.0  % have uncertainties of $ \leq$ 3  % (the category A), 20.0  % hold uncertainties of $ \leq$ 7  % (the category B+), 23.3  % suffer uncertainties of $ \leq$ 10  % (the category B), 8.9  % get uncertainties of $ \leq$ 18  % (the category C+), 19.6  % have uncertainties of $ \leq$ 25  % (the category C), and 13.5  % have uncertainty of $ \leq$ 40  % (the category D+), while 12.3  % have uncertainties of $ > $ 40  % (category D and E). 

 Again, using the method suggested in   [ @Kramida.2014.V2.p22; @Kramida.2014.V212.p11 ], the uncertainty of the $ S$ values for M1 and E2 transitions are estimated. The estimated uncertainties for all E1, M1, and E2 conversion with BF $ \geq 10^{-5}$ are listed in Table   \[table2\ ]. 

 Our MBPT and MCDF lifetimes for the lowest 318 levels of the $ n \leq 4 $ configuration in O - like, which are calculated by considering all possible E1, M1, and E2 transitions, are listed in Table   \[table1\ ]. For the lowest 10 levels of the $ n = 2 $ complex, the MCDF lifetimes match very well with the MBPT results, and the differences are within 3  % . For the persist 308 degree belonging to the $ n = 3 $ and $ n = 4 $ configuration, the average difference with the standard deviation $ 0.5~\% \pm 4.2~\%$. 

 Conclusions 
 = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Employing two department of state - of - the - art methods (MBPT and MCDF), excitation energies and lifetimes of the lowest 318
 $10^{-2} > D \geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7 % for $10^{-3} > S \geq 10^{-4}$; 18 % fov $10^{-4} > S \geq 10^{-5}$, and 35 % yir $10^{-5} > S \geq 10^{-6}$. Fhen, the larger of $\delta S_{ij}$ and $\delva S_{qv}$ is accepted as the uncergainty of each paeticnlar line strengvg. About 1.4 % have mncercamnties of $\leq$ 2 % (jhe category A+), 1.0 % have uncerdakncies of $\leq$ 3 % (the category A), 20.0 % have unsertainyifs of $\leq$ 7 % (the cattgowy B+), 23.3 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 10 % (the cztegory B), 8.9 % have uncettainties of $\leq$ 18 % (the catehory C+), 19.6 % have uncertainhies of $\leq$ 25 % (thq category C), xnd 13.5 % have lucertaintiea of $\leq$ 40 % (the category D+), while 12.3 % have uncertainjnws lx $>$ 40 % (categormes D wnd E).

Again, using the method suggested in [@Kvamide.2014.V2.p22; @Jramida.2014.V212.p11], the uncertamnties of the $S$ valugs for M1 atd E2 transitions arw wstimdted. The wstkmaued uhcertalntmes for all E1, M1, and E2 rransitions with BF $\gqw 10^{-5}$ are listed in Taflq \[table2\].

Our MBPT and MCDF lifetimes for tve mowest 318 levels of the $n \leq 4$ configurations ln O-like, rhich are calculated by considering all possible A1, M1, aid E2 urqnsitkind, are listed in Table \[table1\]. For the lowest 10 ledslx pf the $n = 2$ comilex, the MCDF lifeyilex agree very wgll witk tge MBPT results, anf the dyfferwnces are witnin 3 %. For the remaining 308 levwls belonginy ti the $n = 3$ and $n = 4$ eonfiguratious, the aversge difference with the stahdard deviahion $0.5~\% \pm 4.2~\%$.

Dunclusions
===========

Employkng tfo state-of-the-art methods (MFPT and MRDF), ercitatiov engrgies wnd lifetiles on the lowest 318
$10^{-2} > S \geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7 % > \geq 10^{-4}$; % for $10^{-4} 35 for $10^{-5} > \geq 10^{-6}$. Then, larger of $\delta S_{ij}$ and $\delta is accepted as the uncertainty of each particular line strength. About 1.4 % uncertainties of $\leq$ 2 % (the category A+), 1.0 % have uncertainties of 3 (the A), % have uncertainties of $\leq$ 7 % (the category B+), 23.3 % have uncertainties of $\leq$ % (the category B), 8.9 % have uncertainties $\leq$ 18 % (the C+), 19.6 % have uncertainties $\leq$ % (the C), 13.5 have uncertainties of 40 % (the category D+), while 12.3 % have uncertainties of $>$ 40 % (categories D and Again, using suggested in @Kramida.2014.V212.p11], uncertainties the $S$ values and E2 transitions are estimated. The all E1, M1, and E2 transitions with BF 10^{-5}$ are in Table \[table2\]. Our MBPT and lifetimes for the lowest 318 levels of the \leq 4$ configurations in O-like, which are calculated by considering all possible E1, M1, and are listed in Table For the lowest levels the = complex, the lifetimes agree very well with the MBPT results, and the differences within 3 %. For the remaining 308 levels belonging to = and $n = configurations, the average difference the deviation $0.5~\% \pm 4.2~\%$. Employing state-of-the-art MCDF), energies lifetimes of the lowest
 $10^{-2} > S \geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7 % for $10^{-3} > S \geq 10^{-4}$; 18 % for $10^{-4} > S \geq 10^{-5}$, and 35 % for $10^{-5} > S \Geq 10^{-6}$. Then, the LargeR of $\DelTa s_{ij}$ aNd $\deLta S_{av}$ is acceptED as tHe uncertainty of each parTiculAr LIne sTReNgth. ABout 1.4 % havE UnCERtaInTiEs oF $\lEQ$ 2 % (tHe catEgoRy A+), 1.0 % have UncertaintIes Of $\Leq$ 3 % (the categoRY A), 20.0 % Have uncertAinTies of $\leq$ 7 % (the CatEgory B+), 23.3 % HaVe uNCertaIntIes of $\Leq$ 10 % (the CAtegorY B), 8.9 % have uncErTAintieS Of $\leq$ 18 % (thE CAtEgorY C+), 19.6 % have uncertaintiES oF $\Leq$ 25 % (the category c), and 13.5 % haVe UNcERTaiNtiEs of $\leq$ 40 % (the CaTegorY d+), while 12.3 % hAVe UNCErtAInties of $>$ 40 % (categOries D and E).

AGAin, Using tHe MetHOd suggEsted In [@kRamIda.2014.V2.p22; @KramidA.2014.V212.p11], tHe uncertaInties OF the $S$ vaLUes for M1 And E2 trAnsItiOns aRE eStImaTeD. the EStImaTEd uNcertainTiEs For alL E1, M1, aND e2 TRansItiOns wIth BF $\Geq 10^{-5}$ are listed iN TaBle \[tABle2\].

our MBpT and mCDF LiFetimEs for tHe lowEsT 318 levels of the $n \leQ 4$ conFiguratioNs iN O-LikE, wHich aRE calcuLatEd bY considEring alL PosSiBLE e1, M1, And E2 transitions, are LiSTEd In Table \[tAble1\]. FoR ThE lOWest 10 leveLs Of tHe $n = 2$ cOMPlex, tHe MCdf lIfetimes Agree vERy WeLl with tHe mBPT reSuLts, And The diFFereNces arE within 3 %. FOr the REmaining 308 levels BElonging to the $N = 3$ AnD $N = 4$ CoNFiguRatIons, the averAge dIFferEnce WItH thE StandArd deViATiON $0.5~\% \pm 4.2~\%$.

Conclusions
===========

EmploYiNg two sTate-oF-the-art methodS (MBPT and MCdf), EXcitatioN eneRGiES and lifetimes oF the lOwest 318
 $10^{-2} > S \geq 10^{-3} $; 8.7 % f or $1 0^{ -3}  >  S \ geq10^{-4}$; 18 % for$10^{-4} > S \geq 10^{ -5}$,  a n d 35 %for $ 10^{-5} >S \ge q10 ^{- 6} $ .Then,  th e large r of $\del taS_ {ij}$ and $\ d el ta S_{av}$  is  accepted as  th e unce rt ain t y ofeac h par ticula r  linestrength.  A b out 1. 4  % have u nc erta inties of $\leq$2  % (the categoryA+), 1 .0 %h a veunc ertainties  o f $\l e q$ 3 %( th e c ate g ory A), 20.0% have unce r tai ntiesof  $\ l eq$ 7% (th ec ate gory B+), 2 3.3% have un certai n ties of $\leq$10 % ( the  ca tego r yB) , 8 .9 % h a ve  un c ert aintiesof  $ \leq$  18% ( t he c ate gory  C+),  19.6 % haveunc erta i nti es of  $\le q$ 2 5% (th e cate goryC) , and 13.5 % ha ve u ncertaint ies  o f $ \l eq$ 4 0  % (th e c ate gory D+ ), whil e  12 .3 % ha ve uncertainties o f$ > $40 % (ca tegori e sDa nd E).
Ag ain , us i n g the  met h od  suggest ed in[ @K ra mida.20 14 .V2.p2 2;  @K ram ida.2 0 14.V 212.p1 1], theuncer t ainties of the $S$ values fo r  M 1 an d  E2tra nsitions ar e es t imat ed.T he  es t imate d unc er t ai n ties for all E1, M1 ,and E2  tran sitions withBF $\geq 1 0 ^ { -5}$ are  lis t ed in Table \[tab le2\] .

Our MBP T  and MCD F lif etimes f or the lo w e st 318 l eve lsofthe $ n\leq 4$ confi g u rati on s in O- lik e, whic h a recal cul at ed by con sidering  a ll  p os sib le E1 ,  M1, and  E 2 t ra nsi tions ,  are l isted  inTa bl e  \[ table1\ ] .F o r th elo west  10  l evels  oft he$n = 2$  complex,  th e  MCD Fli fetimes  agree very w el l with the  M BPT  resul t s , and th e differences are withi n  3 %. F orthe r emai ning 308lev els be lon g ing to  the $ n = 3 $and $ n = 4 $ co nfi gu rations, t h e  av erage  d iffe rence w ith the standard d e via tion $0.5~\%\pm  4.2 ~ \ %$ .
C on c lus io n s
= = = ========

Emplo ying two s ta t e- of-the-art met ho ds (MBP T and M CDF), excitat ion energ ies and l if etim e s  of  the lowes t 318
 $10^{-2}_> S_\geq 10^{-3}$; 8.7 % for_$10^{-3} >_S_\geq 10^{-4}$;_18 %_for $10^{-4} >_S \geq 10^{-5}$,_and 35 % for $10^{-5}_> S \geq_10^{-6}$._Then, the larger of $\delta S_{ij}$ and $\delta S_{av}$ is accepted as the uncertainty_of_each particular_line_strength._About 1.4 % have uncertainties of_$\leq$ 2 % (the category A+),_1.0 % have_uncertainties of $\leq$ 3 % (the category A), 20.0 %_have_uncertainties of $\leq$_7 % (the category B+), 23.3 % have uncertainties of $\leq$_10 % (the category B), 8.9 % have_uncertainties of $\leq$_18 %_(the_category C+), 19.6 % have_uncertainties of $\leq$ 25 % (the category_C), and 13.5 % have uncertainties of_$\leq$ 40 % (the category D+), while 12.3 %_have uncertainties of $>$ 40 % (categories_D and E).

Again, using the_method suggested_in [@Kramida.2014.V2.p22; @Kramida.2014.V212.p11], the uncertainties of_the $S$ values_for M1_and E2 transitions_are estimated. The estimated uncertainties for_all E1, M1,_and E2 transitions with BF $\geq_10^{-5}$_are listed in_Table \[table2\].

Our_MBPT_and MCDF_lifetimes for the_lowest_318 levels_of_the $n \leq 4$ configurations in_O-like,_which are calculated by considering all possible_E1, M1, and E2_transitions,_are listed in Table \[table1\]._For the lowest 10 levels_of the $n = 2$ complex,_the MCDF_lifetimes agree_very well with the MBPT results, and the differences are within_3 %. For the remaining 308 levels_belonging to the $n_= 3$_and_$n = 4$_configurations,_the average_difference with the standard deviation $0.5~\% \pm_4.2~\%$.

Conclusions
===========

Employing two_state-of-the-art methods (MBPT and MCDF), excitation_energies and lifetimes of_the_lowest 318