e-Kadison determinant $\Delta=\Delta_\tau:\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ is defined by $\Delta_\tau(x)=\tau(\log|x|)$ if $|x|$ is invertible; and otherwise, we define $\Delta_\tau(x)=\inf\Delta_\tau(|x| + \varepsilon \mathbb{I})$, the infimum takes over all scalars $\varepsilon>0$. We define Fuglede-Kadison determinant-like function of $x$ by $$\Lambda_t(x)=\exp\{\int_0^t\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ Since $\tau(\mathbb{I})=1$, if $|x|$ is invertible, then $$\Delta_\tau(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\int_0^1\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ We understanding that $\Delta(x)=0$ if $$\int_0^{\tau(\mathbb{I})}\log\mu_s(x)ds=-\infty.$$ Recall that $x$ is said to be logarithmically submajorised by $y$(see [@HSZ2020]), denoted by $x\prec\prec_{\log}y$ (or $\mu_s(x)\prec\prec_{\log}\mu_s(y)$), if $\Lambda_t(x)\leq\Lambda_t(y)$ for all $t>0$.

We state for easy reference the following fact, obtained from [@A1967; @B1983] for Fuglede-Kadison determinant which will be applied below.

\[proposition 2.4\] Let $x, y\in\mathcal{M}$. Then

1.  $\Delta_\tau(\mathbb{I})=1, \Delta_\tau(xy)=\Delta_\tau(x)\Delta_\tau(y),$

2.  $\Delta_\tau(x)=\Delta_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\tau(|x|),~\Delta_\tau(|x|^\alpha)
    =(\Delta_\tau(|x|))^\alpha, \alpha\in \mathbb{R}^+$

3.  $\Delta_\tau(x^{-1})=(\Delta_\tau(x))^{-1}, \mbox{if}~ x~\mbox{is invertible in}~\mathcal{M}$

4.  $\Delta_\tau(x)\leq\Delta_\tau(y
e - Kadison determinant $ \Delta=\Delta_\tau:\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ is defined by $ \Delta_\tau(x)=\tau(\log|x|)$ if $ |x|$ is invertible; and otherwise, we define $ \Delta_\tau(x)=\inf\Delta_\tau(|x| + \varepsilon \mathbb{I})$, the infimum take over all scalar $ \varepsilon>0$. We define Fuglede - Kadison determinant - alike routine of $ x$ by $ $ \Lambda_t(x)=\exp\{\int_0^t\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ Since $ \tau(\mathbb{I})=1 $, if $ |x|$ is invertible, then $ $ \Delta_\tau(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\int_0 ^ 1\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ We understanding that $ \Delta(x)=0 $ if $ $ \int_0^{\tau(\mathbb{I})}\log\mu_s(x)ds=-\infty.$$ Recall that $ x$ is said to be logarithmically submajorised by $ y$(see [ @HSZ2020 ]), denote by $ x\prec\prec_{\log}y$ (or $ \mu_s(x)\prec\prec_{\log}\mu_s(y)$), if $ \Lambda_t(x)\leq\Lambda_t(y)$ for all $ t>0$. 

 We state for easy mention the following fact, obtained from [ @A1967; @B1983 ] for Fuglede - Kadison antigenic determinant which will be applied below. 

 \[proposition 2.4\ ] Let $ x, y\in\mathcal{M}$. Then 

 1.   $ \Delta_\tau(\mathbb{I})=1, \Delta_\tau(xy)=\Delta_\tau(x)\Delta_\tau(y),$ 

 2.   $ \Delta_\tau(x)=\Delta_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\tau(|x|),~\Delta_\tau(|x|^\alpha) 
     =( \Delta_\tau(|x|))^\alpha, \alpha\in \mathbb{R}^+$ 

 3.   $ \Delta_\tau(x^{-1})=(\Delta_\tau(x))^{-1 }, \mbox{if}~ x~\mbox{is invertible in}~\mathcal{M}$ 

 4.   $ \Delta_\tau(x)\leq\Delta_\tau(y
e-Kafison determinant $\Delta=\Dtlta_\tau:\mathcal{M}\riyytarrox \mathbg{R}^+$ is dewined by $\Delta_\tau(x)=\tau(\log|x|)$ if $|x|$ is ibvertible; and otherwisd, we defije $\Delta_\rau(x)=\mnf\Delta_\tau(|x| + \vacspsilon \mathbg{L})$, the mnfimum takes oyer all scanars $\varepsilot>0$. De define Fuglede-Kadison determinant-lyke funvtlon of $x$ by $$\Laibda_u(x)=\evp\{\inf_0^n\lig\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ Since $\tau(\mathbb{I})=1$, if $|s|$ is innertible, then $$\Delya_\tau(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\int_0^1\log\mu_s(x)fs\}.$$ Wf understanding thwt $\Delta(x)=0$ id $$\ine_0^{\rau(\mathbb{I})}\loe\mu_s(x)ds=-\infuy.$$ Recall thzt $x$ is said to be logarithmicauly sbbmajorised bt $y$(dge [@HSZ2020]), denotxd by $q\prec\prec_{\log}y$ (or $\mu_s(x)\[rec\prev_{\log}\mu_s(y)$), if $\Lakbde_t(x)\lwq\Lambda_t(y)$ for all $t>0$.

Wx state for easy refgrence the fkllowing fact, obtqibed ftom [@A1967; @B1983] fue Fjgltde-Lasison fetxrminant whjch will be applied below.

\[propoxieppn 2.4\] Let $x, y\ih\mathcwl{I}$. Then

1.  $\Delta_\tau(\mathbb{I})=1, \Delta_\tau(xy)=\Delta_\uau(x)\Dslta_\tau(y),$

2.  $\Delta_\tau(x)=\Deltq_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\tau(|x|),~\Delta_\tao(|x|^\alpha)
    =(\Delta_\tau(|x|))^\alpha, \alpha\in \mathbb{R}^+$

3.  $\Delta_\tau(x^{-1})=(\Delta_\tag(x))^{-1}, \mbkb{if}~ x~\icix{ls invertible in}~\mathcal{M}$

4.  $\Delta_\tau(x)\leq\Delta_\tat(g
e-Kadison determinant $\Delta=\Delta_\tau:\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ is defined by $|x|$ invertible; and we define $\Delta_\tau(x)=\inf\Delta_\tau(|x| takes all scalars $\varepsilon>0$. define Fuglede-Kadison determinant-like of $x$ by $$\Lambda_t(x)=\exp\{\int_0^t\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ Since $\tau(\mathbb{I})=1$, $|x|$ is invertible, then $$\Delta_\tau(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\int_0^1\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ We understanding that $\Delta(x)=0$ if $$\int_0^{\tau(\mathbb{I})}\log\mu_s(x)ds=-\infty.$$ Recall that is said to be logarithmically submajorised by $y$(see [@HSZ2020]), denoted by $x\prec\prec_{\log}y$ (or if for $t>0$. state for easy reference the following fact, obtained from [@A1967; @B1983] for Fuglede-Kadison determinant which will applied below. \[proposition 2.4\] Let $x, y\in\mathcal{M}$. Then $\Delta_\tau(\mathbb{I})=1, \Delta_\tau(xy)=\Delta_\tau(x)\Delta_\tau(y),$ 2. $\Delta_\tau(x)=\Delta_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\tau(|x|),~\Delta_\tau(|x|^\alpha) \alpha\in \mathbb{R}^+$ 3. $\Delta_\tau(x^{-1})=(\Delta_\tau(x))^{-1}, \mbox{if}~ invertible 4. $\Delta_\tau(x)\leq\Delta_\tau(y
e-Kadison determinant $\Delta=\DElta_\tau:\matHcal{M}\RigHtaRrOw \maThbb{r}^+$ is defined by $\DeLTa_\taU(x)=\tau(\log|x|)$ if $|x|$ is invertibLe; and OtHErwiSE, wE defiNe $\Delta_\TAu(X)=\INf\DElTa_\Tau(|X| + \vARePsiloN \maThbb{I})$, thE infimum taKes OvEr all scalars $\VArEpsilon>0$. We dEfiNe Fuglede-KadIsoN deterMiNanT-Like fUncTion oF $x$ by $$\LaMBda_t(x)=\eXp\{\int_0^t\log\Mu_S(X)ds\}.$$ SinCE $\tau(\matHBB{I})=1$, If $|x|$ iS invertible, then $$\DeLTa_\TAu(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\iNt_0^1\log\mU_s(X)Ds\}.$$ wE UndErsTanding thaT $\DElta(x)=0$ IF $$\int_0^{\tau(\MAtHBB{i})}\loG\Mu_s(x)ds=-\infty.$$ ReCall that $x$ is SAid To be loGaRitHMicallY submAjORisEd by $y$(see [@HSZ2020]), DenoTed by $x\preC\prec_{\lOG}y$ (or $\mu_s(X)\Prec\preC_{\log}\mu_S(y)$), iF $\LaMbda_T(X)\lEq\lamBdA_T(y)$ fOR aLl $t>0$.

wE stAte for eaSy ReFerenCe thE FOLLowiNg fAct, oBtainEd from [@A1967; @B1983] for FuGleDe-KaDIsoN deteRminaNt whIcH will Be applIed beLoW.

\[proposition 2.4\] Let $X, y\in\Mathcal{M}$. THen

1.  $\deLta_\TaU(\mathBB{I})=1, \DeltA_\taU(xy)=\delta_\taU(x)\Delta_\TAu(y),$

2.  $\deLTA_\TaU(x)=\Delta_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\taU(|x|),~\dELtA_\tau(|x|^\alpHa)
    =(\DeltA_\TaU(|x|))^\ALpha, \alphA\iN \maThbb{r}^+$

3.  $\dElta_\tAu(x^{-1})=(\DELtA_\tau(x))^{-1}, \mboX{if}~ x~\mbOX{iS iNvertibLe In}~\mathCaL{M}$

4.  $\DEltA_\tau(x)\LEq\DeLta_\tau(Y
e-Kadison determinant $\De lta=\Delta _\tau :\m ath ca l{M} \rig htarrow \mathb b {R}^ +$ is defined by $\Del ta_\t au ( x)=\ t au (\log |x|)$ i f  $ | x |$is  i nve rt i bl e; an d o therwis e, we defi ne$\ Delta_\tau(x ) =\ inf\Delta_ \ta u(|x| + \var eps ilon \ ma thb b {I})$ , t he in fimumt akes o ver all s ca l ars $\ v arepsil o n >0 $. W e define Fuglede- K ad i son determinan t-like  f u nc t i onof$x$ by $$\ La mbda_ t (x)=\ex p \{ \ i n t_0 ^ t\log\mu_s(x) ds\}.$$ Sin c e $ \tau(\ ma thb b {I})=1 $, if  $ | x|$  is inverti ble,  then $$\ Delta_ \ tau(x)= \ Lambda_ 1(x)=\ exp \{\ int_ 0 ^1 \l og\ mu _ s(x ) ds \}. $ $ W e unders ta nd ing t hat$ \ D e lta( x)= 0$ i f $$\ int_0^{\tau(\ mat hbb{ I })} \log\ mu_s( x)ds =- \inft y.$$ R ecall  t hat $x$ is said  tobe logari thm ic all ysubma j orised  by  $y $(see [ @HSZ202 0 ]),  d e n o te d by $x\prec\prec_ {\ l o g} y$ (or $ \mu_s( x )\ pr e c\prec_{ \l og} \mu_ s ( y)$),  if$ \L ambda_t( x)\leq \ La mb da_t(y) $for al l$t> 0$. 

Wes tate  for e asy refe rence the followingf act, obtained fr o m  [ @ A196 7;@B1983] for  Fug l ede- Kadi s on  de t ermin ant w hi c hw ill be applied belo w. 

\[pr oposi tion 2.4\] Le t $x, y\in \ m a thcal{M} $. T h en 
1.  $\Delta_\ tau(\ mathbb{I}) = 1, \Delt a_\ta u(xy)=\D elta_\tau ( x )\Delta_ \ta u(y ),$ 

2 .  $ \Delta_\tau(x ) = \Del ta _\tau(x ^*) =\Delta _\t au( |x| ),~ \D elta_\tau (|x|^\al ph a) 
  =( \Delt a _\tau(|x |) )^\ al pha , \al p ha\in\math bb{R }^ +$ 
3.   $\Del t a_ \ t au(x ^{ -1 })=( \De lt a_\ta u(x) ) ^{- 1}, \mb ox{if}~ x ~\m b ox{i sin vertibl e in}~\mathca l{ M}$

4.  $ \D elt a_\tau ( x )\leq\De lta_\tau(y
e-Kadison determinant_$\Delta=\Delta_\tau:\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$_is defined by $\Delta_\tau(x)=\tau(\log|x|)$_if $|x|$_is_invertible; and_otherwise,_we define $\Delta_\tau(x)=\inf\Delta_\tau(|x|_+ \varepsilon \mathbb{I})$,_the infimum takes over_all scalars $\varepsilon>0$._We_define Fuglede-Kadison determinant-like function of $x$ by $$\Lambda_t(x)=\exp\{\int_0^t\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ Since $\tau(\mathbb{I})=1$, if $|x|$ is invertible,_then_$$\Delta_\tau(x)=\Lambda_1(x)=\exp\{\int_0^1\log\mu_s(x)ds\}.$$ We_understanding_that_$\Delta(x)=0$ if $$\int_0^{\tau(\mathbb{I})}\log\mu_s(x)ds=-\infty.$$ Recall that_$x$ is said to be_logarithmically submajorised_by $y$(see [@HSZ2020]), denoted by $x\prec\prec_{\log}y$ (or $\mu_s(x)\prec\prec_{\log}\mu_s(y)$),_if_$\Lambda_t(x)\leq\Lambda_t(y)$ for all_$t>0$.

We state for easy reference the following fact, obtained_from [@A1967; @B1983] for Fuglede-Kadison determinant_which will be_applied_below.

\[proposition_2.4\] Let $x, y\in\mathcal{M}$._Then

1.  $\Delta_\tau(\mathbb{I})=1, \Delta_\tau(xy)=\Delta_\tau(x)\Delta_\tau(y),$

2.  $\Delta_\tau(x)=\Delta_\tau(x^*)=\Delta_\tau(|x|),~\Delta_\tau(|x|^\alpha)
_   =(\Delta_\tau(|x|))^\alpha, \alpha\in \mathbb{R}^+$

3._ $\Delta_\tau(x^{-1})=(\Delta_\tau(x))^{-1}, \mbox{if}~ x~\mbox{is invertible in}~\mathcal{M}$

4. _$\Delta_\tau(x)\leq\Delta_\tau(y