}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s}  
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overline m_c(3~\mbox{GeV})& = &(1.462 - 4.00\times\alpha_s(m_Z)) 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm syst}\\ &&
\, \pm \, (-0.148+1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\rm pert} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ for the $\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ charm mass. At the level of uncertainties obtained in our work excellent convergence of perturbation theory was observed. Adopting $\alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1184 \pm 0.0021$ we then obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\overline m_c(\overline m_c) & = & 1.277 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \pm \, (0.013)_{\rm syst} 
\, \pm \, (0.019)_{\rm pert}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overline m_c(3~\mbox{GeV}) & = & 0.998 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm syst} 
\, \pm \, (0.022)_{\rm pert}
\, \pm \, (0.010)_{\alpha_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Our perturbative error of $20$ MeV is a factor of ten larger, and the experimental uncertainty of $14$ MeV is by $5$ MeV larger than in the most recent analysis of Ref. [@Kuhn:2007vp]. For estimating the perturbative error a range of scale variations between $\overline m_c(\overline m_c)$ and $4$ GeV was employed. Adding all uncertainties quadratically we obtain $$\begin{aligned
} 
 \, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s }  
 \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle } 
 \,,\nonumber 
 \\[2 mm ] 
 \overline m_c(3~\mbox{GeV }) & = & (1.462 - 4.00\times\alpha_s(m_Z) ) 
 \, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat } 
 \, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm syst}\\ & & 
 \, \pm \, (-0.148 + 1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\rm pert } 
 \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle } 
 \,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ for the $ \overline{\mbox{MS}}$ charm mass. At the level of uncertainties prevail in our workplace excellent convergence of perturbation theory was note. Adopting $ \alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1184 \pm 0.0021 $ we then obtain $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \overline m_c(\overline m_c) & = & 1.277 
 \, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat } 
 \, \pm \, (0.013)_{\rm syst } 
 \, \pm \, (0.019)_{\rm pert } 
 \, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s } 
 \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle } 
 \,,\nonumber 
 \\[2 mm ] 
 \overline m_c(3~\mbox{GeV }) & = & 0.998 
 \, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat } 
 \, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm syst } 
 \, \pm \, (0.022)_{\rm pert } 
 \, \pm \, (0.010)_{\alpha_s } 
 \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle } 
 \,.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Our perturbative erroneousness of $ 20 $   MeV is a gene of ten larger, and the experimental doubt of $ 14 $   MeV is by $ 5 $   MeV large than in the most late analysis of Ref.   [ @Kuhn:2007vp ]. For estimating the perturbative error a range of plate variations between $ \overline m_c(\overline m_c)$ and $ 4 $   GeV was employed. lend all uncertainties quadratically we obtain $ $ \begin{aligned
}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s}  
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\vangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overlinx m_c(3~\mbos{GeV})& = &(1.462 - 4.00\gimes\alpha_s(m_Z)) 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \'m \, (0.014)_{\em sywt}\\ &&
\, \pm \, (-0.148+1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\ro pert} 
\, \pl \, (0.002)_{\langlw GG\cangle}
\,,\nonumber\env{zligned}$$ for tgc $\ovexlmne{\mbox{MS}}$ charm mass. At tve level of unweftcinties obtained in our work excellegt convrrhence of pertutbatipg thsory was observed. Adopting $\alpha_s(m_A) = 0.1184 \pm 0.0021$ we then obtaon $$\begin{aligned}
\overline m_c(\lverpine m_c) & = & 1.277 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rl stat} 
\, \pm \, (0.013)_{\rm ftst} 
\, \pm \, (0.019)_{\rm oert}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\lzngle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overlind m_c(3~\myox{GeV}) & = & 0.998 
\, \pn \, (0.006)_{\gk stat} 
\, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm sjst} 
\, \pm \, (0.022)_{\rm pcgt}
\, \pm \, (0.010)_{\dlpha_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\vanglx}
\,.\nonymber\\\end{aligned}$$ Our pxrturbative error of $20$ MeV is a fcctor of ten larger, abd the gxperhmengql jnctrteinfy of $14$ LeV is by $5$ MeV larger thab in the most recenu agqlysis of Ref. [@Iuhn:2007vp]. Fjr estimating the perturbative error a gangs of scale variations bwtween $\overline m_c(\ovetline m_c)$ agd $4$ GeV was employed. Adding all uncertainties quadsaticeluy cc uvtwin $$\begin{aligned
} \, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s} \, \pm GG\rangle} \\[2mm] \overline = &(1.462 - stat} \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm && \, \pm (-0.148+1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\rm pert} \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle \,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ for the $\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ charm mass. At the level of uncertainties obtained in work excellent convergence of perturbation theory was observed. Adopting $\alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1184 \pm we obtain \overline m_c) & = & 1.277 \, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} \, \pm \, (0.013)_{\rm syst} \, \, (0.019)_{\rm pert} \, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s} \, \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle} \,,\nonumber \overline m_c(3~\mbox{GeV}) & = & \, \, (0.006)_{\rm \, \, syst} \, \pm (0.022)_{\rm pert} \, \pm \, (0.010)_{\alpha_s} \, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle} \,.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Our perturbative error of $20$ is a ten larger, the uncertainty $14$ MeV is MeV larger than in the most Ref. [@Kuhn:2007vp]. For estimating the perturbative error a of scale between $\overline m_c(\overline m_c)$ and $4$ was employed. Adding all uncertainties quadratically we obtain
}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s}  
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nOnumber
\\[2mm]
\oVerliNe m_C(3~\mbOx{geV})& = &(1.462 - 4.00\tImes\Alpha_s(m_Z)) 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stAT} 
\, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rM syst}\\ &&
\, \pm \, (-0.148+1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\rm Pert} 
\, \pM \, (0.002)_{\lANgle gg\rAngle}
\,,\NonumbeR\EnD{ALigNeD}$$ fOr tHe $\OVeRline{\MboX{MS}}$ charM mass. At the LevEl Of uncertaintIEs Obtained in Our Work excellenT coNvergeNcE of PErturBatIon thEory waS ObservEd. AdoptinG $\aLPha_s(m_Z) = 0.1184 \PM 0.0021$ we then OBTaIn $$\beGin{aligned}
\overlinE M_c(\OVerline m_c) & = & 1.277 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm sTat} 
\, \pm \, (0.013)_{\rM sYSt} 
\, \PM \, (0.019)_{\Rm pErt}
\, \Pm \, (0.009)_{\alpha_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\LaNgle Gg\Rangle}
\,,\nONuMBER
\\[2mm]
\OVerline m_c(3~\mbox{geV}) & = & 0.998 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \PM \, (0.014)_{\rm Syst} 
\, \pm \, (0.022)_{\Rm PerT}
\, \Pm \, (0.010)_{\alphA_s} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\lAnGLe Gg\rangle}
\,.\nonuMber\\\End{aligneD}$$ Our peRTurbatiVE error oF $20$ MeV is A faCtoR of tEN lArGer, AnD The EXpEriMEntAl uncertAiNtY of $14$ Mev is bY $5$ mEv LargEr tHan iN the mOst recent analYsiS of REF. [@KuHn:2007vp]. FOr estImatInG the pErturbAtive ErRor a range of scalE varIations beTweEn $\OveRlIne m_c(\OVerlinE m_c)$ And $4$ geV was eMployed. aDdiNg ALL UnCertainties quadratIcALLy We obtain $$\Begin{aLIgNeD
}
\, \pm \, (0.009)_{\alph a_s}  
\,\pm \ , ( 0.0 02 )_{\ lang le GG\rangle}\ ,,\n onumber
\\[2mm]
\overl ine m _c ( 3~\m b ox {GeV} )& = &( 1 .4 6 2  -4. 00 \ti me s \a lpha_ s(m _Z)) 
\ , \pm \, ( 0.0 06 )_{\rm stat} 
\ , \pm \, ( 0.0 14)_{\rm sys t}\ \ &&
\ ,\pm \, (- 0.1 48+1. 43\tim e s\alph a_s(m_Z)) _{ \ rm per t } 
\, \ p m  \ , (0 .002)_{\langle GG \ ra n gle}
\,,\nonum ber\en d{ a li g n ed} $$for the $\ ov erlin e {\mbox{ M S} } $ cha r m mass. At th e level ofu nce rtaint ie s o b tained  in o ur wor k excellent  con vergenceof per t urbatio n  theory  was o bse rve d. A d op ti ng$\ a lph a _s (m_ Z ) =  0.1184\p m0.002 1$ w e t h en o bta in $ $\beg in{aligned}
\ ove rlin e  m_ c(\ov erlin e m_ c)  & =& 1.27 7 
\,  \ pm \, (0.006)_{ \rmstat} 
\,  \p m\,(0 .013) _ {\rm s yst } \, \pm\, (0.0 1 9)_ {\ r m pe rt}
\, \pm \, (0.0 09 ) _ {\ alpha_s}  
\, \ p m\, (0.002)_ {\ lan gleG G \rang le}\ ,, \nonumbe r
\\[2 m m] 
\ overlin em_c(3~ \m box {Ge V}) & = &0.998
\, \pm\, (0 . 006)_{\rm stat }  
\, \pm \, ( 0 .0 1 4 )_ { \rmsys t} 
\, \pm\, ( 0 .022 )_{\ r mper t }
\,\pm \ ,( 0. 0 10)_{\alpha_s} 
\,\p m \, ( 0.002 )_{\langle GG \rangle}
\ , . \ nonumber \\\e n d{ a ligned}$$ Ourpertu rbative er r or of $2 0$ Me V is a f actor oft e n larger , a ndthe  ex p e ri mental uncert a i ntyof  $14$ M eVis by $ 5$MeV  la rge rthan in t he mostre ce nt  a nal ysiso f Ref. [ @K uhn :2 007 vp].F or est imati ng t he  p e rtu rbative er r o r ara ng e of  sc al e var iati o nsbetween  $\overli nem _c(\ ov er line m_ c)$ and $4$ G eV  was emplo ye d.Adding a ll uncer tainties quadraticallyw e obtai n $ $\beg in{a ligned
}
\, \pm_\, (0.009)_{\alpha_s}_ 
\, \pm \,_(0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overline_m_c(3~\mbox{GeV})&_= &(1.462_-_4.00\times\alpha_s(m_Z)) 
\, \pm_\, (0.006)_{\rm stat}_
\, \pm \, (0.014)_{\rm_syst}\\ &&
\, \pm_\,_(-0.148+1.43\times\alpha_s(m_Z))_{\rm pert} 
\, \pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ for the $\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ charm mass. At the_level_of uncertainties_obtained_in_our work excellent convergence of_perturbation theory was observed. Adopting_$\alpha_s(m_Z) =_0.1184 \pm 0.0021$ we then obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\overline m_c(\overline_m_c)_& = &_1.277 
\, \pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \pm \,_(0.013)_{\rm syst} 
\, \pm \, (0.019)_{\rm_pert}
\, \pm \,_(0.009)_{\alpha_s}_
\,_\pm \, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,,\nonumber
\\[2mm]
\overline_m_c(3~\mbox{GeV}) & = & 0.998 
\,_\pm \, (0.006)_{\rm stat} 
\, \pm_\, (0.014)_{\rm syst} 
\, \pm \, (0.022)_{\rm_pert}
\, \pm \, (0.010)_{\alpha_s} 
\, \pm_\, (0.002)_{\langle GG\rangle}
\,.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Our perturbative_error of_$20$ MeV is a factor of_ten larger, and_the experimental_uncertainty of $14$ MeV_is by $5$ MeV larger than in_the most recent_analysis of Ref. [@Kuhn:2007vp]. For estimating the_perturbative_error a range_of_scale_variations between_$\overline m_c(\overline m_c)$_and_$4$ GeV was_employed._Adding all uncertainties quadratically we obtain_$$\begin{aligned