 and so in this case the effects of binarity are suppressed even further.

Finally, we can summarize these various components to provide a rough estimate of the fraction of planets that will be detected when we consider binary systems, relative to our fiducial assumption that all stars are single. We find $1/3 + (0.1+ 0.62 \langle N_B/N_0\rangle)\times (2/3) \simeq 0.68-0.77$. Thus we expect that our estimated yields are systematically high by at most $30\%$. This is generally of order or smaller than other sources of uncertainty in our predicted yields.

We note that a corollary of our assertion that binaries have a small effect on the yields of transit surveys is that a substantial fraction of the planets that have been found in wide-field transit surveys should be in binary systems. Only two planets in confirmed common proper-motion binary systems have been reported [@burke2007; @bakos2007], however systematic surveys for stellar companions to the host stars of the known transiting planets have not been performed, and therefore the true incidence of binary systems amongst the sample of transiting planets is not known.

Results
=======

Using the preceding formalism, we simulated four different surveys modes used by transit searches: point-and-stare, drift-scanning, space-based, and all-sky surveys. For the point-and-stare and drift-scanning cases, we use the TrES and XO transit surveys as our examples, respectively. Both surveys have been successful in their hunt for planets, and so we are able to directly compare the results of our calculations with the actual number of detections. For VHJs and HJs, we simulate the detection of planets with $R_p=1.1R_{Jup}$, and with the period distribution from [@gould2006b] that we describe in Section 2.2.

[c|c]{} Band & 550-700 nm\
$m_R$ Limit & $\approx 13$\
Observation Time & Varies\
Exposure Time & 90 seconds\
CCD Read Time & 25 seconds\
Telescope Diameter & 0.1 m\
Throughput & 0.6\
PSF (FWHM) & 25”\
$\theta_{pix}$ & 10”\
CCD Full-Well Depth & $1.2\times10^5
and so in this case the effects of binarity are suppressed even far. 

 ultimately, we can summarize these various components to put up a rough estimate of the fraction of planet that will be detected when we consider binary organization, relative to our fiducial presumption that all stars are single. We witness $ 1/3 + (0.1 + 0.62 \langle N_B / N_0\rangle)\times (2/3) \simeq 0.68 - 0.77$. Thus we expect that our estimated yields are systematically high by at most $ 30\%$. This is by and large of order or smaller than other source of uncertainty in our predicted yields. 

 We note that a corollary of our affirmation that binaries have a little effect on the yields of transit view is that a substantial fraction of the planets that have been found in wide - field transit surveys should be in binary systems. Only two planets in confirmed common proper - motion binary systems have been reported [ @burke2007; @bakos2007 ], however systematic surveys for leading companion to the host star topology of the know transiting planets have not been performed, and therefore the genuine incidence of binary systems amongst the sample of transiting planets is not know. 

 Results 
 = = = = = = = 

 Using the preceding formalism, we simulated four different surveys mode used by transit searches: point - and - stare, drift - scanning, quad - based, and all - sky survey. For the point - and - stare and drift - scanning cases, we use the TrES and XO transit view as our examples, respectively. Both surveys have been successful in their hunt for planet, and so we are able to directly compare the results of our calculations with the actual issue of detections. For VHJs and HJs, we model the detection of planets with $ R_p=1.1R_{Jup}$, and with the time period distribution from [ @gould2006b ] that we describe in part 2.2. 

 [ c|c ] { } Band & 550 - 700 nm\ 
 $ m_R$ Limit & $ \approx 13$\ 
 Observation Time & Varies\ 
 Exposure Time & 90 seconds\ 
 CCD Read Time & 25 seconds\ 
 Telescope Diameter & 0.1 m\ 
 Throughput & 0.6\ 
 PSF (FWHM) & 25”\ 
 $ \theta_{pix}$ & 10”\ 
 CCD Full - Well astuteness & $ 1.2\times10 ^ 5
 anf so in this case the efnects of binariti qre su'presses even fjrther.

Finally, we can summarive tyese carious components to orovide a rough ewtimete of the fractmkn of planets bhat ciol be detected when we cmnsider binary shscems, relative to our fiducial assumpeion thst all stars are sinbje. Ws find $1/3 + (0.1+ 0.62 \langle N_B/N_0\rangle)\times (2/3) \aimeq 0.68-0.77$. Uhus we expect thay our estimated yields are syshematically high bj at most $30\%$. Jgis us generally of order or smaller tgan other sources of uncertainth in pur predicjze ylglds.

We note vhat a corollary on our avsertiom that binariex heve q small effect on the yields of transit surveys hs that a substantiql fracjion mf tfw puantts tgat hage ueen found jn wide-fiele transit surveys snotod be in binady syseeis. Only two planets in confirmed common prkper-motion binary systens have been reported [@burke2007; @bahos2007], however systematic surveys for stellar companhons vo tht mjrr dtars of the known transiting planets have noe bten performed, and therefore yhf ytue incidence uf bincdy systems amongst tje sampje of transitigg pkanets is not known.

Results
=======

Uwing the prebedibg formalism, we silulated foux diffgrent xurveys modes used by txansit searches: plint-and-stzfe, drift-scanning, spsca-based, and all-sky surveys. Sor the piint-cnd-stare and drift-fcanning cwses, we use the TrES and XO ttansit surveys ad our examples, respectively. Boti surveys havg baen successyul in their hunt fjr planets, and so we cre abue to direbtly compere the resujts of our canfulations wivh the aceual numver of adtections. For FHJs and KLs, we simylate the detectiok of klznets with $R_p=1.1R_{Jbk}$, abd with the perood diftgibntion xrom [@gould2006b] dhat we cescrkbe in Sectlon 2.2.

[c|c]{} Nand & 550-700 nm\
$m_R$ Limit & $\a[pros 13$\
Observation Time & Yaries\
Expisure Tiie & 90 seconds\
CVD Read Time & 25 seclnds\
Txlesco'e Diaketgr & 0.1 m\
Throughput & 0.6\
PSF (FWHM) & 25”\
$\thefa_{pix}$ & 10”\
CCF Fmll-Well Depth & $1.2\tines10^5
and so in this case the effects are even further. we can summarize a estimate of the of planets that be detected when we consider binary relative to our fiducial assumption that all stars are single. We find $1/3 (0.1+ 0.62 \langle N_B/N_0\rangle)\times (2/3) \simeq 0.68-0.77$. Thus we expect that our estimated are high at $30\%$. This is generally of order or smaller than other sources of uncertainty in our predicted We note that a corollary of our assertion binaries have a small on the yields of transit is a substantial of planets have been found wide-field transit surveys should be in binary systems. Only two planets in confirmed common proper-motion binary systems been reported however systematic for companions the host stars known transiting planets have not been the true incidence of binary systems amongst the of transiting is not known. Results ======= Using preceding formalism, we simulated four different surveys modes by transit searches: point-and-stare, drift-scanning, space-based, and all-sky surveys. For the point-and-stare and drift-scanning cases, the TrES and XO surveys as our respectively. surveys been in their for planets, and so we are able to directly compare the of our calculations with the actual number of detections. For HJs, simulate the detection planets with $R_p=1.1R_{Jup}$, and the distribution from [@gould2006b] that in 2.2. 550-700 $m_R$ & $\approx 13$\ Observation & Varies\ Exposure Time & seconds\ CCD Read Time & 0.1 m\ Throughput & 0.6\ PSF (FWHM) 25”\ $\theta_{pix}$ & 10”\ CCD Full-Well Depth $1.2\times10^5
 and so in this case the effects Of binarity Are suPprEssEd Even FurtHer.

Finally, we caN SummArize these various compoNents To PRoviDE a Rough EstimatE Of THE frAcTiOn oF pLAnEts thAt wIll be deTected when We cOnSider binary sYStEms, relativE to Our fiducial aSsuMption ThAt aLL starS arE singLe. We fiND $1/3 + (0.1+ 0.62 \langlE N_B/N_0\ranglE)\tIMes (2/3) \simEQ 0.68-0.77$. Thus we EXPeCt thAt our estimated yieLDs ARe systematicalLy high By AT mOST $30\%$. ThIs iS generally Of Order OR smalleR ThAN OTheR Sources of unceRtainty in ouR PreDicted YiEldS.

we note That a CoROllAry of our assErtiOn that binAries hAVe a smalL Effect oN the yiEldS of TranSIt SuRveYs IS thAT a SubSTanTial fracTiOn Of the PlanETS THat hAve Been Found In wide-field trAnsIt suRVeyS shouLd be iN binArY systEms. OnlY two pLaNets in confirmed CommOn proper-mOtiOn BinArY systEMs have BeeN rePorted [@bUrke2007; @bakOS2007], hoWeVER SyStematic surveys for StELLaR companiOns to tHE hOsT Stars of tHe KnoWn trANSitinG plaNEtS have not Been peRFoRmEd, and thErEfore tHe TruE inCidenCE of bInary sYstems amOngst THe sample of tranSIting planets iS NoT KNoWN.

ResUltS
=======

Using the prEcedINg foRmalISm, We sIMulatEd fouR dIFfERent surveys modes useD bY transIt seaRches: point-and-Stare, drift-SCANning, spaCe-baSEd, ANd all-sky surveyS. For tHe point-and-STare and dRift-sCanning cAses, we use THE TrES and xO tRanSit SurVEYs As our examples, RESpecTiVely. BotH suRveys haVe bEen SucCesSfUl in their Hunt for pLaNeTs, AnD so We are ABle to dirEcTly CoMpaRe the REsults Of our CalcUlAtIOns With the ACtUAL numBeR oF detEctIoNs. For vHJs ANd Hjs, we simUlate the dEteCTion Of PlAnets wiTh $R_p=1.1R_{Jup}$, and wiTh The period dIsTriBution FROm [@gould2006b] That we describe in Section 2.2.

[C|C]{} Band & 550-700 nm\
$M_R$ LImit & $\aPproX 13$\
ObservatIon time & VaRieS\
exposuRe Time & 90 SeconDs\
cCD rEAd TimE & 25 SEcOndS\
TElescope DiAMEteR & 0.1 m\
ThrOuGhpuT & 0.6\
PSF (FWHm) & 25”\
$\theta_{pix}$ & 10”\
CCD Full-WeLL DePth & $1.2\times10^5
 and so in this case the e ffects ofbinar ity  ar esupp ress ed even furthe r .

F inally, we can summari ze th es e  var i ou s com ponents to p rov id ea r ou g hestim ate  of the  fractionofpl anets that w i ll  be detect edwhen we cons ide r bina ry  sy s tems,  re lativ e to o u r fidu cial assu mp t ion th a t all s t a rs  are  single. We find$ 1/ 3  + (0.1+ 0.62\langl eN _B / N _0\ ran gle)\times  ( 2/3)\ simeq 0 . 68 - 0 . 77$ .  Thus we expe ct that our est imated  y iel d s aresyste ma t ica lly high by  atmost $30\ %$. Th i s is ge n erallyof ord erorsmal l er  t han  o t her so urc e s o f uncert ai nt y inourp r e d icte d y ield s.

W e note that a  co roll a ryof ou r ass erti on  that  binar ies h av e a small effec t on  the yiel dsof  tr an sit s u rveysistha t a sub stantia l  fr ac t i o nof the planets tha th a ve  been fo und in wi de - field tr an sit  sur v e ys sh ould be  in bina ry sys t em s.  Only t wo  plane ts  in  co nfirm e d co mmon p roper-mo tionb inary systemsh ave been repo r te d [@ b urke 200 7; @bakos20 07], howe vers ys tem a tic s urvey sf or stellar companionsto  the h ost s tars of the k nown trans i t i ng plane ts h a ve not been perfo rmed,  and there f ore thetrueincidenc e of bina r y  systems  am ong stthe s am ple of transi t i ng p la nets is  no t known .
Res ult s
= == ====

Usi ng the p re ce di ng  fo rmali s m, we si mu lat ed  fo ur di f ferent  surv eysmo de s  us ed by t r an s i t se ar ch es:poi nt -and- star e , d rift-sc anning, s pac e -bas ed ,and all -sky surveys.  F or the poi nt -an d-star e and drif t-scanning cases, we us e  the Tr ESand X O tr ansit sur vey s as o ure xample s, res pecti ve ly. B oth s u r ve ysha ve been su c c ess ful i nthei r huntfor planets, and s o  we  are able todir ectl y co mpa r et here s ult s of our calculat ions withth e  a ctual numb e r o fdetecti ons. Fo r VHJ s  and HJ s, we sim ulate the  d etec t i onof planets  with $R _p=1.1R_{ J up}$, an d wit h t he per io d d istri bution fro m [@g ould20 06 b] tha t wede scribe i n Section 2.2.

[c|c]{}  Band& 550 -70 0 nm\
$m_ R$L imi t & $\app rox13$\
Obser vat ion  Time  &V aries \
Ex p os ure Time& 90 seconds\C CD  Re a d  T ime & 25 se c o n ds\ 
Tele sco p e Diam eter  & 0.1 m\
Through p ut & 0.6\
PSF(FWH M )  &25” \ 
$\t he ta_{pix}$ & 10 ”\CC D Full-Wel lDepth & $1. 2\times1 0^ 5 
 and_so in_this case the effects_of binarity_are_suppressed even_further.

Finally,_we can summarize_these various components_to provide a rough_estimate of the_fraction_of planets that will be detected when we consider binary systems, relative to our_fiducial_assumption that_all_stars_are single. We find $1/3_+ (0.1+ 0.62 \langle N_B/N_0\rangle)\times_(2/3) \simeq_0.68-0.77$. Thus we expect that our estimated yields_are_systematically high by_at most $30\%$. This is generally of order or_smaller than other sources of uncertainty_in our predicted_yields.

We_note_that a corollary of_our assertion that binaries have a_small effect on the yields of_transit surveys is that a substantial fraction_of the planets that have been_found in wide-field transit surveys_should be_in binary systems. Only two_planets in confirmed_common proper-motion_binary systems have_been reported [@burke2007; @bakos2007], however systematic_surveys for stellar_companions to the host stars of_the_known transiting planets_have_not_been performed,_and therefore the_true_incidence of_binary_systems amongst the sample of transiting_planets_is not known.

Results
=======

Using the preceding formalism, we_simulated four different surveys_modes_used by transit searches:_point-and-stare, drift-scanning, space-based, and all-sky_surveys. For the point-and-stare and drift-scanning_cases, we_use the_TrES and XO transit surveys as our examples, respectively. Both surveys_have been successful in their hunt_for planets, and so_we are_able_to directly compare_the_results of_our calculations with the actual number of_detections. For_VHJs and HJs, we simulate the_detection of planets with_$R_p=1.1R_{Jup}$,_and with the period distribution from_[@gould2006b] that we describe in Section_2.2.

[c|c]{} Band & 550-700 nm\
$m_R$_Limit_&_$\approx 13$\
Observation Time & Varies\
Exposure_Time & 90 seconds\
CCD Read Time_& 25 seconds\
Telescope_Diameter & 0.1 m\
Throughput & 0.6\
PSF (FWHM)_&_25”\
$\theta_{pix}$ & 10”\
CCD Full-Well Depth &_$1.2\times10^5