j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ Let $y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambda _{1}=0,$ then the four eigenvalues of $\rho ^{AB}$ in Eq.(21) are $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{4}(1\pm \sqrt{y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}\pm \lambda _{2})^{2}}).\end{gathered}$$ These eigenvalues are all nonnegtive then we need $$\begin{gathered}
0<\lambda _{2}<\lambda _{3},   \\
y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}+\lambda _{2})^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ There are many triples $\{y_{1},\lambda _{3},\lambda _{2}\}$ satisfy Eqs.(25,26), then the corresponding states in Eq.(21) are lazy but discordant states.

Some disentangled but not lazy 2-qubit states
=============================================

To show there exist many 2-qubit states which are disentangled but not lazy, we consider the states of the form $$\begin{gathered}
\rho ^{AB}=p|\psi _{1}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _{1}^{A}|\otimes \rho
_{1}^{B}+(1-p)|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _{2}^{A}|\otimes \rho
_{2}^{B},\end{gathered}$$ where $p\in (0,1),\{|\psi _{i}^{A}\rangle \}_{i=1}^{2}$ are normalized states in $H^{A}$ but not necessarily orthogonal,$\{\rho
_{i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2} $ are density operators on $H^{B}.$ Note that $p=0$ or $%
p=1$ leads to direct product states, so we do not consider such cases.

Under locally unitary transformations, we let $$\begin{gathered}
|\psi _{1}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _{1}^{A}|=\frac{I+(0,0,1)\cdot
\overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2},   \\
|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _{2}^{A}|=%
\frac{I+(\sin \alpha,0,\cos \alpha )\cdot \overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2},   \\
\rho _{1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,
j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ Let $ y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambda _ { 1}=0,$ then the four eigenvalues of $ \rho ^{AB}$ in Eq.(21) are $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \frac{1}{4}(1\pm \sqrt{y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _ { 3}\pm \lambda _ { 2})^{2}}).\end{gathered}$$ These eigenvalues are all nonnegtive then we necessitate $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 0<\lambda _ { 2}<\lambda _ { 3 },    \\ 
 y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _ { 3}+\lambda _ { 2})^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ There be many triples $ \{y_{1},\lambda _ { 3},\lambda _ { 2}\}$ satisfy Eqs.(25,26), then the corresponding states in Eq.(21) are faineant but discordant states. 

 Some disentangled but not lazy 2 - qubit state of matter 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 To show there exist many 2 - qubit states which are extricate but not lazy, we consider the state of the form $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \rho ^{AB}=p|\psi _ { 1}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _ { 1}^{A}|\otimes \rho 
 _ { 1}^{B}+(1 - p)|\psi _ { 2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _ { 2}^{A}|\otimes \rho 
 _ { 2}^{B},\end{gathered}$$ where $ p\in (0,1),\{|\psi _ { i}^{A}\rangle \}_{i=1}^{2}$ are normalized state in $ H^{A}$ but not inevitably orthogonal,$\{\rho 
 _ { i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2 } $ are density operators on $ H^{B}.$ notice that $ p=0 $ or $% 
 p=1 $ leads to lineal intersection states, so we do not consider such event. 

 Under locally unitary transformations, we permit $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 |\psi _ { 1}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _ { 1}^{A}|=\frac{I+(0,0,1)\cdot 
 \overrightarrow{\sigma } } { 2 },    \\ 
 |\psi _ { 2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi _ { 2}^{A}|=% 
 \frac{I+(\sin \alpha,0,\cos \alpha) \cdot \overrightarrow{\sigma } } { 2 },    \\ 
 \rho _ { 1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,
j}^{2}\lee 1.\end{gathered}$$ Let $y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambaa _{1}=0,$ then the foor eigentalues kf $\rho ^{AC}$ in Eq.(21) are $$\begin{gathered}
\frar{1}{4}(1\pm \wqrt{y_{1}^{2}+(\oambda _{3}\pm \lambda _{2})^{2}}).\end{gaghered}$$ Thvse eigencaluts are all nonnegvjve thek we hced $$\bzgmn{gathered}
0<\lambds _{2}<\lambda _{3},   \\
y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}+\lambga _{2})^{2}\lzq 1.\end{gathered}$$ There are many triplef $\{y_{1},\lambca _{3},\lambda _{2}\}$ satissy Eaf.(25,26), thsn the corresponding states in Eq.(21) zre lazj but discordant xtates.

Some disentangled buh noh lazy 2-qubit stated
=============================================

To show thgde qzist many 2-qucit states which are djsentangled but not lazy, we conrider the statew if hve form $$\begmn{gathvred}
\rho ^{AB}=p|\psl _{1}^{A}\rangne \langke \psi _{1}^{A}|\otimes \rhm
_{1}^{B}+(1-p)|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psm _{2}^{A}|\otimes \rho
_{2}^{B},\end{gatrered}$$ whese $p\in (0,1),\{|\psi _{i}^{A}\rangle \}_{i=1}^{2}$ are tormdlizde sgatts mn $G^{A}$ but nov necessarimy orthogonql,$\{\rho
_{i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2} $ are densiuy jirrators on $H^{G}.$ Note trat $p=0$ or $%
p=1$ leads to direct product statts, so we do not consider sucy cases.

Under locally onitary trwnsformations, we let $$\begin{gathered}
|\psi _{1}^{A}\rangle \lancle \pak _{1}^{A}|=\yvwz{U+(0,0,1)\cfot
\overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2},   \\
|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle \langle \[ai _{2}^{A}|=%
\nrac{I+(\sin \alpha,0,\cof \alpha )\cdoy \lvrtrightarrow{\sigoa }}{2},   \\
\xgo _{1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,
j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ Let $y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambda _{1}=0,$ then the of ^{AB}$ in are $$\begin{gathered} \frac{1}{4}(1\pm eigenvalues all nonnegtive then need $$\begin{gathered} 0<\lambda _{3}, \\ y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}+\lambda _{2})^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ are many triples $\{y_{1},\lambda _{3},\lambda _{2}\}$ satisfy Eqs.(25,26), then the corresponding states in are lazy but discordant states. Some disentangled but not lazy 2-qubit states ============================================= show exist 2-qubit which are disentangled but not lazy, we consider the states of the form $$\begin{gathered} \rho ^{AB}=p|\psi \langle \psi _{1}^{A}|\otimes \rho _{1}^{B}+(1-p)|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi \rho _{2}^{B},\end{gathered}$$ where $p\in _{i}^{A}\rangle \}_{i=1}^{2}$ are normalized states $H^{A}$ not necessarily _{i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2} are operators on $H^{B}.$ that $p=0$ or $% p=1$ leads to direct product states, so we do not consider such cases. locally unitary let $$\begin{gathered} _{1}^{A}\rangle \psi \overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2}, \\ \langle \psi _{2}^{A}|=% \frac{I+(\sin \alpha,0,\cos \alpha \\ \rho _{1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,
j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ Let $y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambdA _{1}=0,$ then the foUr eigEnvAluEs Of $\rhO ^{AB}$ iN Eq.(21) are $$\begin{gatHEred}
\Frac{1}{4}(1\pm \sqrt{y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}\pm \lamBda _{2})^{2}}).\enD{gATherED}$$ THese eIgenvalUEs ARE alL nOnNegTiVE tHen we NeeD $$\begin{gAthered}
0<\lamBda _{2}<\LaMbda _{3},   \\
y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}+\lAMbDa _{2})^{2}\leq 1.\end{gaTheRed}$$ There are mAny TripleS $\{y_{1},\LamBDa _{3},\lamBda _{2}\}$ SatisFy Eqs.(25,26), tHEn the cOrrespondInG States IN Eq.(21) are lAZY bUt diScordant states.

SomE DiSEntangled but noT lazy 2-qUbIT sTATes
=============================================

to sHow there exIsT many 2-QUbit staTEs WHICh aRE disentangled But not lazy, wE ConSider tHe StaTEs of thE form $$\BeGIn{gAthered}
\rho ^{Ab}=p|\psI _{1}^{A}\rangle \lAngle \pSI _{1}^{A}|\otimeS \Rho
_{1}^{B}+(1-p)|\psI _{2}^{A}\rangLe \lAngLe \psI _{2}^{a}|\oTiMes \RhO
_{2}^{b},\enD{GaTheREd}$$ wHere $p\in (0,1),\{|\pSi _{I}^{A}\RanglE \}_{i=1}^{2}$ arE NORMaliZed StatEs in $H^{a}$ but not necessAriLy orTHogOnal,$\{\rHo
_{i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2} $ Are dEnSity oPeratoRs on $H^{b}.$ NOte that $p=0$ or $%
p=1$ leadS to dIrect prodUct StAteS, sO we do NOt consIdeR suCh cases.

under loCAllY uNITArY transformations, we LeT $$\BEgIn{gatherEd}
|\psi _{1}^{A}\RAnGlE \Langle \psI _{1}^{A}|=\FraC{I+(0,0,1)\cdOT
\OverrIghtARrOw{\sigma }}{2},   \\
|\pSi _{2}^{A}\ranGLe \LaNgle \psi _{2}^{a}|=%
\fRac{I+(\siN \aLphA,0,\coS \alphA )\Cdot \OverriGhtarrow{\Sigma }}{2},   \\
\RHo _{1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,
j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered }$$ Let $y _{2}= y_{ 3}= \l ambd a _{ 1}=0,$ then th e  fou r eigenvalues of $\rho  ^{AB }$ in E q .( 21) a re $$\b e gi n { gat he re d}\f r ac {1}{4 }(1 \pm \sq rt{y_{1}^{ 2}+ (\ lambda _{3}\ p m\lambda _{ 2}) ^{2}}).\end{ gat hered} $$  Th e se ei gen value s area ll non negtive t he n  we ne e d $$\be g i n{ gath ered}
0<\lambda _ { 2} < \lambda _{3},  \\
y _{ 1 }^ { 2 }+( \la mbda _{3}+ \l ambda _{2})^{ 2 }\ l e q  1. \ end{gathered} $$ There ar e  ma ny tri pl es$ \{y_{1 },\la mb d a _ {3},\lambda  _{2 }\}$ sati sfy Eq s .(25,26 ) , thenthe co rre spo ndin g  s ta tes  i n  Eq . (2 1)a relazy but  d is corda nt s t a t e s.
Som e di senta ngled but not  la zy 2 - qub it st ates==== == ===== ====== ===== == =============== ==== ==

To sh owth ere  e xistm any 2- qub itstateswhich a r e d is e n t an gled but not lazy,  w e co nsider t he sta t es  o f  the for m$$\ begi n { gathe red} \r ho ^{AB} =p|\ps i  _ {1 }^{A}\r an gle \l an gle  \p si _{ 1 }^{A }|\oti mes \rho 
_{1} ^ {B}+(1-p)|\psi _{2}^{A}\rang l e\ l an g le \ psi  _{2}^{A}|\ otim e s \r ho
_ { 2} ^{B } ,\end {gath er e d} $ $ where $p\in (0,1) ,\ {|\psi  _{i} ^{A}\rangle \ }_{i=1}^{2 } $ are norm aliz e ds tates in $H^{A }$ bu t not nece s sarily o rthog onal,$\{ \rho
_{i} ^ { B}\}_{i= 1}^ {2}  $are d en sity operator s on $ H^ {B}.$ N ote  that $ p=0 $ o r $ %
p =1 $ leads t o direct  p ro du ct  st ates, so we do  n otco nsi der s u ch cas es.
Unde rlo c all y unita r yt r ansf or ma tion s,we  let$$\b e gin {gather ed}
|\psi  _{ 1 }^{A }\ ra ngle \l angle \psi _{ 1} ^{A}|=\fra c{ I+( 0,0,1) \ c dot
\ove rrightarrow{\sigma }}{2 } ,   \\|\p si _{ 2}^{ A}\rangle  \l angle\ps i  _{2}^ {A}|=% 
\fra c{ I+( \ s in \a l p ha ,0, \c os \alpha) \ cdo t \ov er righ tarrow{ \sigma }}{2},   \\ \rh o _{1}^{B}=\f rac {I+a ( 0 ,
j}^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$_Let $y_{2}=y_{3}=\lambda__{1}=0,$ then the four_eigenvalues of_$\rho_^{AB}$ in_Eq.(21)_are $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{4}(1\pm \sqrt{y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda__{3}\pm \lambda _{2})^{2}}).\end{gathered}$$_These eigenvalues are all_nonnegtive then we_need_$$\begin{gathered}
0<\lambda _{2}<\lambda _{3},   \\
y_{1}^{2}+(\lambda _{3}+\lambda _{2})^{2}\leq 1.\end{gathered}$$ There are many triples $\{y_{1},\lambda__{3},\lambda__{2}\}$ satisfy_Eqs.(25,26),_then_the corresponding states in Eq.(21)_are lazy but discordant states.

Some_disentangled but_not lazy 2-qubit states
=============================================

To show there exist many_2-qubit_states which are_disentangled but not lazy, we consider the states of_the form $$\begin{gathered}
\rho ^{AB}=p|\psi _{1}^{A}\rangle \langle_\psi _{1}^{A}|\otimes \rho
_{1}^{B}+(1-p)|\psi__{2}^{A}\rangle_\langle_\psi _{2}^{A}|\otimes \rho
_{2}^{B},\end{gathered}$$ where_$p\in (0,1),\{|\psi _{i}^{A}\rangle \}_{i=1}^{2}$ are normalized_states in $H^{A}$ but not necessarily_orthogonal,$\{\rho
_{i}^{B}\}_{i=1}^{2} $ are density operators on $H^{B}.$_Note that $p=0$ or $%
p=1$ leads_to direct product states, so_we do_not consider such cases.

Under locally_unitary transformations, we_let $$\begin{gathered}
|\psi__{1}^{A}\rangle \langle \psi__{1}^{A}|=\frac{I+(0,0,1)\cdot
\overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2},   \\
|\psi _{2}^{A}\rangle_\langle \psi _{2}^{A}|=%
\frac{I+(\sin_\alpha,0,\cos \alpha )\cdot \overrightarrow{\sigma }}{2}, __\\
\rho _{1}^{B}=\frac{I+a(0,