 luminosity range. This confirms the substantial absence of evolution of $S_{3g}$ in the redshift range $0 < z < 1$ at the level of $\sim 10$%. This result is expected for $S_{3m}$, but is not trivial for $S_{3g}$, given the evolution of bias.

-   At second order, galaxies with higher luminosity or stellar mass have a larger amplitude (greater linear bias parameter) of the volume–averaged two–point correlation function, consistently with the direct analysis of the two–point correlation function by. We showed that our estimate of the linear bias parameter $b=\sigma_{8g}/\sigma_{8m}$ is consistent within $1 \sigma$ with those of and [@2014arXiv1406.6692D]. The linear bias increases both with luminosity and with redshift: in our redshift range, we measured the lowest bias $b=1.47 \pm 0.18$ for galaxies with $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -19.5$ in the redshift bin $0.5 \le z < 0.7$ and the largest bias $b=2.12 \pm 0.28$ for galaxies with $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -21.0$ in the redshift bin $0.9 \le z < 1.1$.

-   For a given luminosity class, $\sigma_{8g}$ does not evolve with redshift. For example, comparing our values for $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -20.5$ to the corresponding value measured in the 2dFGRS, we found that $\sigma_{8g}$ is consistent with a constant value  1.0 (our $1 \sigma$ error is 10%), from $z=0$ to $z \sim 1$. Given that $\sigma_{8m}$ increases with time, we have the empirical relation $b(z) \propto 1/ \sigma_{8m}(z)$.

-   The value of the non–linear bias parameter $b_2$ measured below $z \sim 1$ at the scale $R = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that is, in the quasi–linear regime, is negative but not statistically different from zero when taking into account the error; however, taking into account the
luminosity range. This confirms the substantial absence of evolution of $ S_{3g}$ in the red shift compass $ 0 < z < 1 $ at the level of $ \sim 10$%. This resultant role is ask for $ S_{3m}$, but is not trivial for $ S_{3g}$, given the development of bias. 

 -    At second order, galaxies with high luminosity or stellar mass get a larger amplitude (greater linear bias parameter) of the volume – averaged two – detail correlation function, consistently with the lineal analysis of the two – point correlation coefficient function by. We show that our estimate of the linear bias parameter $ b=\sigma_{8g}/\sigma_{8m}$ is consistent within $ 1 \sigma$ with those of and [ @2014arXiv1406.6692D ]. The linear diagonal increases both with luminosity and with redshift: in our redshift range, we measured the lowest diagonal $ b=1.47 \pm 0.18 $ for galaxy with $ M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -19.5 $ in the redshift bin $ 0.5 \le z < 0.7 $ and the largest bias $ b=2.12 \pm 0.28 $ for galaxies with $ M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -21.0 $ in the redshift bin $ 0.9 \le z < 1.1$. 

 -    For a given luminosity class, $ \sigma_{8g}$ does not develop with red shift. For example, comparing our values for $ M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -20.5 $ to the comparable value measure in the 2dFGRS, we found that $ \sigma_{8g}$ is consistent with a changeless value   1.0 (our $ 1 \sigma$ error is 10 %), from $ z=0 $ to $ z \sim 1$. Given that $ \sigma_{8m}$ increases with meter, we have the empirical relation $ b(z) \propto 1/ \sigma_{8m}(z)$. 

 -    The value of the non – linear bias parameter $ b_2 $ quantify below $ z \sim 1 $ at the scale $ R = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that is, in the quasi – linear government, is negative but not statistically unlike from zero when subscribe into account the error; however, taking into account the
 lulinosity range. This conflrms the substanjiql absxnce of evolutiun of $S_{3g}$ in the redshift ranje $0 < z < 1$ qt the level of $\sim 10$%. Tfis resuln is expexted dor $S_{3m}$, but is not bxiviam for $W_{3g}$, given the eyolution of bias.

-   At secmna lrder, galaxies with higher luminosiey or syeplar mass have a lswger amplitude (greater linear bias parzmeter) mf the volume–sveraged two–point correlatlon vunction, consistenhly with thg diwwct analysis of the two–point corremation function by. We showed thxt oux estimate if thf linear biaw parwmeter $b=\sigma_{8g}/\sigma_{8m}$ is conxistent within $1 \smgma$ with those of and [@2014arEiv1406.6692D]. The linear bias increasev yoth with luminosity qne witv regshiwr: iv ohr rsdshifh renge, we meaaured the liwest bias $b=1.47 \pm 0.18$ fot dqlaxies with $J_B(z=1.1)-5\log(r) \je -19.5$ in the redshift bin $0.5 \le z < 0.7$ and the ladgest bias $b=2.12 \pm 0.28$ for gaoaxies with $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \lg -21.0$ in the wedshift bin $0.9 \le z < 1.1$.

-   For a given luminosity clavs, $\sijmx_{8g}$ bies nur fvolve with redshift. For example, comparing ouw vslles for $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \lc -20.5$ to the correspomdlnb value measurgd in tks 2sFGRS, we found thah $\sigma_{8d}$ is xonsistenu witn a constant value  1.0 (our $1 \sitma$ error is 10%), from $z=0$ to $z \sim 1$. Yiven that $\sngma_{8m}$ oncresses with time, we have che emlirical relwtion $b(z) \lfopto 1/ \sigma_{8m}(z)$.

-   Thv vanue of the non–linear bias [arameter $b_2$ mzasured celoe $z \sii 1$ at the dcale $R = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that is, ln thg quash–linear rehime, is negative but not statisvmcally differgnt frmm zero chen tsking into acsount the errot; however, takivg into acbount the
luminosity range. This confirms the substantial absence of in the range $0 < level $\sim 10$%. This is expected for but is not trivial for $S_{3g}$, the evolution of bias. - At second order, galaxies with higher luminosity or mass have a larger amplitude (greater linear bias parameter) of the volume–averaged two–point function, with direct of the two–point correlation function by. We showed that our estimate of the linear bias parameter is consistent within $1 \sigma$ with those of [@2014arXiv1406.6692D]. The linear bias both with luminosity and with in redshift range, measured lowest $b=1.47 \pm 0.18$ galaxies with $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -19.5$ in the redshift bin $0.5 \le z < 0.7$ and the largest $b=2.12 \pm galaxies with \le in redshift bin $0.9 < 1.1$. - For a given does not evolve with redshift. For example, comparing values for \le -20.5$ to the corresponding value in the 2dFGRS, we found that $\sigma_{8g}$ is with a constant value 1.0 (our $1 \sigma$ error is 10%), from $z=0$ to $z Given that $\sigma_{8m}$ increases time, we have empirical $b(z) 1/ - The of the non–linear bias parameter $b_2$ measured below $z \sim 1$ the scale $R = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that is, in regime, negative but not different from zero when into the error; however, taking the
 luminosity range. This confirMs the substAntiaL abSenCe Of evOlutIon of $S_{3g}$ in the reDShifT range $0 < z < 1$ at the level of $\sim 10$%. this rEsULt is EXpEcted For $S_{3m}$, buT Is NOT trIvIaL foR $S_{3G}$, GiVen thE evOlution Of bias.

-   At seConD oRder, galaxies WItH higher lumInoSity or stellaR maSs have A lArgER amplItuDe (greAter liNEar biaS parameteR) oF The volUMe–averaGED tWo–poInt correlation funCTiON, consistently wIth the DiREcT ANalYsiS of the two–pOiNt corRElation FUnCTIOn bY. we showed that oUr estimate oF The Linear BiAs pARameteR $b=\sigMa_{8G}/\SigMa_{8m}$ is consisTent Within $1 \sigMa$ with THose of aND [@2014arXiv1406.6692D]. the linEar BiaS incREaSeS boTh WIth LUmInoSIty And with rEdShIft: in Our rEDSHIft rAngE, we mEasurEd the lowest biAs $b=1.47 \Pm 0.18$ foR GalAxies With $M_b(z=1.1)-5\loG(h) \Le -19.5$ in tHe redsHift bIn $0.5 \Le z < 0.7$ and the largesT biaS $b=2.12 \pm 0.28$ for gaLaxIeS wiTh $m_B(z=1.1)-5\loG(H) \le -21.0$ in tHe rEdsHift bin $0.9 \Le z < 1.1$.

-   For a GIveN lUMINoSity class, $\sigma_{8g}$ doeS nOT EvOlve with RedshiFT. FOr EXample, coMpAriNg ouR VAlues For $M_b(Z=1.1)-5\lOg(h) \le -20.5$ to tHe corrESpOnDing valUe MeasurEd In tHe 2dfGRS, wE FounD that $\sIgma_{8g}$ is cOnsisTEnt with a constaNT value  1.0 (our $1 \sigmA$ ErROR iS 10%), From $Z=0$ to $Z \sim 1$. Given thAt $\siGMa_{8m}$ iNcreASeS wiTH time, We havE tHE eMPirical relation $b(z) \prOpTo 1/ \sigmA_{8m}(z)$.

-   ThE value of the noN–linear biaS PARameter $b_2$ MeasUReD Below $z \sim 1$ at the Scale $r = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that iS, In the quaSi–linEar regimE, is negatiVE But not stAtiStiCalLy dIFFeRent from zero wHEN takInG into acCouNt the erRor; HowEveR, taKiNg into accOunt the
 luminosity range. This co nfirms the  subs tan tia labse nceof evolution o f  $S_ {3g}$ in the redshiftrange  $ 0  < z <1$ at  the le v el o f $ \s im  10 $% .  T his r esu lt is e xpected fo r $ S_ {3m}$, but i s  n ot trivial  fo r $S_{3g}$,giv en the  e vol u tionofbias. 

-  A t seco nd order,  g a laxies with hi g h er  lum inosity or stella r  m a ss have a larg er amp li t ud e (gr eat er linearbi as pa r ameter) of t h e v o lume–averaged  two–pointc orr elatio nfun c tion,consi st e ntl y with thedire ct analys is oft he two– p oint co rrelat ion  fu ncti o nby . W es how e dtha t  ou r estima te  o f the  lin e a r bias  pa rame ter $ b=\sigma_{8g} /\s igma _ {8m }$ is  cons iste nt  with in $1\sigm a$  with those ofand[@2014arX iv1 40 6.6 69 2D].T he lin ear  bi as incr eases b o thwi t h lu minosity and withre d s hi ft: in o ur red s hi ft range, w emea sure d the l owes t  b ias $b=1 .47 \p m  0 .1 8$ forga laxies  w ith  $M _B(z= 1 .1)- 5\log( h) \le - 19.5$ in the redshif t  bin $0.5 \le z< 0. 7 $ an d t he largestbias $b=2 .12\ pm  0. 2 8$ fo r gal ax i es with $M_B(z=1.1)-5\ lo g(h) \ le -2 1.0$ in the r edshift bi n $ 0.9 \lez <1 .1 $ .

-   For a g ivenluminosity class, $ \sigm a_{8g}$does note v olve wit h r eds hif t.F o rexample, comp a r ingou r value s f or $M_B (z= 1.1 )-5 \lo g( h) \le -2 0.5$ toth eco rr esp ondin g  value m ea sur ed  in  the2 dFGRS,  we f ound  t ha t  $\ sigma_{ 8 g} $ is c on si sten t w it h a c onst a ntvalue 1.0 (our$1\ sigm a$  e rror is  10%), from $ z= 0$ to $z \ si m 1 $. Giv e n  that $\ sigma_{8m}$ increases w i th time , w e hav e th e empiric alrelati on$ b(z) \ propto  1/ \ si gma _ { 8m}(z ) $ .
- The valueo f  th e non –l inea r biasparameter $b_2$ me a sur ed below $z \ sim  1$a t  t hes ca l e $ R=  8h ^ {-1}$ Mpc, that  is, in th eq ua si–linearr egi me , is ne gativebut n o t stati sticallydifferent  f romz e rowhen takin g into a ccount th e  erro r ;howev er,  takin gint o acc ount t h e
 luminosity_range. This_confirms the substantial absence_of evolution_of_$S_{3g}$ in_the_redshift range $0_< z <_1$ at the level_of $\sim 10$%._This_result is expected for $S_{3m}$, but is not trivial for $S_{3g}$, given the evolution_of_bias.

- __At_second order, galaxies with higher_luminosity or stellar mass have_a larger_amplitude (greater linear bias parameter) of the volume–averaged_two–point_correlation function, consistently_with the direct analysis of the two–point correlation function_by. We showed that our estimate_of the linear_bias_parameter_$b=\sigma_{8g}/\sigma_{8m}$ is consistent within_$1 \sigma$ with those of and_[@2014arXiv1406.6692D]. The linear bias increases both_with luminosity and with redshift: in our_redshift range, we measured the lowest_bias $b=1.47 \pm 0.18$ for_galaxies with_$M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -19.5$ in the_redshift bin $0.5_\le z_< 0.7$ and_the largest bias $b=2.12 \pm 0.28$_for galaxies with_$M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -21.0$ in the redshift_bin_$0.9 \le z_<_1.1$.

-_ _For a given_luminosity_class, $\sigma_{8g}$_does_not evolve with redshift. For example,_comparing_our values for $M_B(z=1.1)-5\log(h) \le -20.5$ to_the corresponding value measured_in_the 2dFGRS, we found_that $\sigma_{8g}$ is consistent with_a constant value  1.0 (our $1_\sigma$ error_is 10%),_from $z=0$ to $z \sim 1$. Given that $\sigma_{8m}$ increases with_time, we have the empirical relation_$b(z) \propto 1/ \sigma_{8m}(z)$.

-_ _The_value of the_non–linear_bias parameter_$b_2$ measured below $z \sim 1$ at_the scale_$R = 8 h^{-1}$ Mpc, that_is, in the quasi–linear_regime,_is negative but not statistically different_from zero when taking into account_the error; however, taking into_account_the