 compact object in CygnusX-3, a later type than suggested by earlier works [@ker96; @fen99; @han00].

Mass loss rate evaluation
-------------------------

As @ogl01, we evaluated the mass loss rate of this free-free emitting wind, following the @wri75 formula (8) giving the emitted flux density (in Jansky) by a stellar wind assumed to be spherical, homogeneous and at a constant velocity : $$\centering 
        \mathrm{S}_\nu \, =\, 23.2 \, 
          \left(\frac{\dot{\mathrm{M}}}{\mu \mathrm{v}_\infty}\right)^{4/3} 
          \ \frac{\nu^{2/3}}{ \mathrm{D}_ \mathrm{kpc}^2} 
          \  \gamma^{2/3}\,\mathrm{g}^{2/3}\,\mathrm{Z}^{4/3} \quad \mathrm{Jy}$$ where D is the distance to the source in kpc. It gives : $$\centering 
        \dot{\mathrm{M}}\, =\, 5.35.10^{-7} \, \mathrm{S}_\nu^{3/4}\,
                (\nu_ \mathrm{GHz}\, \gamma\, \mathrm{Z^2})^{-1/2} \,
                \mu\,\mathrm{v}_\infty \quad \mathrm{M_\odot.yr^{-1}}$$ (where $\nu$ is in GHz). With an assumed distance D=10kpc, a Gaunt factor g=1, a flux density deduced from the continuum fitting (@lut96 law, Fig. 3) of S$_\nu$=63 mJy at 6.75$\mu$m (4.44$\times 10^{4}$GHz), and for a WN-type wind (where the mean atomic weight per nucleon $\mu$=1.5, the number of free electrons per nucleon $\gamma_e$=1 and the mean ionic charge Z=1), and with a velocity of v$_\infty$= 1500km.s$^{-1}$ (van Kerkwijk 1996), one obtains M=1.2$\times$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.yr$^{-1}$. This is in agreement with the mass transfer rate estimated by @ker96 and (within a factor of 2) by @ogl01. This result is in good agreement with the recent revised WN mass-loss rate estimates, which have been
compact object in CygnusX-3, a later type than suggest by early works [ @ker96; @fen99; @han00 ]. 

 Mass loss rate evaluation 
 ------------------------- 

 As @ogl01, we evaluate the mass loss pace of this free - free emitting tip, following the @wri75 formula (8) give the emitted flux concentration (in Jansky) by a stellar wind assumed to be spherical, homogeneous and at a constant velocity: $ $ \centering 
         \mathrm{S}_\nu \, = \, 23.2 \, 
           \left(\frac{\dot{\mathrm{M}}}{\mu \mathrm{v}_\infty}\right)^{4/3 } 
           \ \frac{\nu^{2/3 } } { \mathrm{D } _ \mathrm{kpc}^2 } 
           \   \gamma^{2/3}\,\mathrm{g}^{2/3}\,\mathrm{Z}^{4/3 } \quad \mathrm{Jy}$$ where D is the distance to the source in kpc. It contribute: $ $ \centering 
         \dot{\mathrm{M}}\, = \, 5.35.10^{-7 } \, \mathrm{S}_\nu^{3/4}\, 
                 (\nu _ \mathrm{GHz}\, \gamma\, \mathrm{Z^2})^{-1/2 } \, 
                 \mu\,\mathrm{v}_\infty \quad \mathrm{M_\odot.yr^{-1}}$$ (where $ \nu$ is in GHz). With an assumed distance D=10kpc, a Gaunt factor g=1, a flux concentration deduced from the continuum fitting (@lut96 law, Fig.   3) of S$_\nu$=63 mJy at 6.75$\mu$m (4.44$\times 10^{4}$GHz), and for a WN - character wind (where the bastardly atomic weight unit per nucleon $ \mu$=1.5, the number of free electrons per nucleon $ \gamma_e$=1 and the hateful ionic charge Z=1), and with a velocity of v$_\infty$= 1500km.s$^{-1}$ (van Kerkwijk 1996), one obtains M=1.2$\times$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.yr$^{-1}$. This is in agreement with the mass transfer pace estimate by @ker96 and (within a factor of 2) by @ogl01. This result is in good agreement with the recent revised WN mass - loss rate estimates, which have been
 colpact object in CygnusX-3, x later type thcb suggxsted bg earlief works [@ker96; @fen99; @han00].

Mass loss rqte ecaluation
-------------------------

As @ogl01, we evauuated thv mass lows rete of this free-hdee emibcing slnd, fmolowing the @wrl75 formula (8) civing the emidtdd flux density (in Jansky) by a stellaw wind ssdumed to be spreribaj, hojogeneous and at a constant velocify : $$\cenuering 
        \matnrm{S}_\nu \, =\, 23.2 \, 
          \left(\fgac{\dlt{\mathrm{M}}}{\mu \mathrm{g}_\infty}\right)^{4/3} 
          \ \frac{\nj^{2/3}}{ \mathrm{D}_ \mathrm{kpc}^2} 
          \  \gamma^{2/3}\,\mathrm{g}^{2/3}\,\mathrm{Z}^{4/3} \qjad \mcthrm{Jy}$$ whetz D lv the distaice to the source lm kpc. Ht givex : $$\centering 
        \dot{\mathrm{M}}\, =\, 5.35.10^{-7} \, \mathrm{V}_\nu^{3/4}\,
                (\nu_ \mathrk{GKz}\, \gamma\, \mathrm{Z^2})^{-1/2} \,
                \mu\,\mxrhro{v}_\ihfvy \suad \mwthcm{M_\odot.yr^{-1}}$$ (wgere $\nu$ is un GHz). With an assukeq distance D=10kpd, a Gatne factor g=1, a flux density deduced from uhe ckntinuum fitting (@lut96 laq, Fig. 3) of S$_\nu$=63 mJy at 6.75$\mo$m (4.44$\times 10^{4}$GRz), and for a WN-type wind (where the mean atomic wehght 'ef nbgjdin $\mu$=1.5, the number of free electrons per nucleon $\dzmka_v$=1 and the mean iokic charge Z=1), and wotj s velocity of x$_\infty$= 1500km.a$^{-1}$ (van Kerkwijk 1996), onf obtaigs M=1.2$\tumes$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.rr$^{-1}$. Tnis is in agreement with thw mass transyer rate estimated by @ker96 and (wichin a factpr of 2) by @ogl01. This resuut ia in good ahreement skth the recent rdvixeg WN mass-loss rate estimatqs, which iave yeen
compact object in CygnusX-3, a later type by works [@ker96; @han00]. Mass loss we the mass loss of this free-free wind, following the @wri75 formula (8) the emitted flux density (in Jansky) by a stellar wind assumed to be homogeneous and at a constant velocity : $$\centering \mathrm{S}_\nu \, =\, 23.2 \, \mathrm{v}_\infty}\right)^{4/3} \frac{\nu^{2/3}}{ \mathrm{kpc}^2} \gamma^{2/3}\,\mathrm{g}^{2/3}\,\mathrm{Z}^{4/3} \quad \mathrm{Jy}$$ where D is the distance to the source in kpc. It gives : \dot{\mathrm{M}}\, =\, 5.35.10^{-7} \, \mathrm{S}_\nu^{3/4}\, (\nu_ \mathrm{GHz}\, \gamma\, \, \mu\,\mathrm{v}_\infty \quad \mathrm{M_\odot.yr^{-1}}$$ $\nu$ is in GHz). With assumed D=10kpc, a factor a density deduced from continuum fitting (@lut96 law, Fig. 3) of S$_\nu$=63 mJy at 6.75$\mu$m (4.44$\times 10^{4}$GHz), and for a WN-type (where the weight per $\mu$=1.5, number free electrons per and the mean ionic charge Z=1), velocity of v$_\infty$= 1500km.s$^{-1}$ (van Kerkwijk 1996), one M=1.2$\times$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.yr$^{-1}$. This in agreement with the mass transfer estimated by @ker96 and (within a factor of by @ogl01. This result is in good agreement with the recent revised WN mass-loss rate have been
 compact object in CygnusX-3, a laTer type thaN suggEstEd bY eArliEr woRks [@ker96; @fen99; @han00].

MaSS losS rate evaluation
-------------------------

As @ogl01, we EvaluAtED the MAsS loss Rate of tHIs FREe-fReE eMitTiNG wInd, foLloWing the @Wri75 formula (8) GivInG the emitted fLUx Density (in JAnsKy) by a stellar WinD assumEd To bE SpherIcaL, homoGeneouS And at a Constant vElOCity : $$\ceNTering 
        \mATHrM{S}_\nu \, =\, 23.2 \, 
          \Left(\frac{\dot{\mathrm{m}}}{\Mu \MAthrm{v}_\infty}\rigHt)^{4/3} 
          \ \frac{\Nu^{2/3}}{ \MAtHRM{D}_ \mAthRm{kpc}^2} 
          \  \gamma^{2/3}\,\MaThrm{g}^{2/3}\,\MAthrm{Z}^{4/3} \qUAd \MATHrm{jY}$$ where D is the dIstance to thE SouRce in kPc. it gIVes : $$\cenTerinG 
        \dOT{\maThrm{M}}\, =\, 5.35.10^{-7} \, \mathrm{s}_\nu^{3/4}\,
                (\nU_ \mathrm{GHZ}\, \gamma\, \MAthrm{Z^2})^{-1/2} \,
                \mU\,\Mathrm{v}_\Infty \qUad \MatHrm{M_\ODoT.yR^{-1}}$$ (whErE $\Nu$ iS In gHz). wIth An assumeD dIsTance d=10kpc, A gAUNt faCtoR g=1, a fLux deNsity deduced fRom The cONtiNuum fIttinG (@lut96 LaW, Fig. 3) oF S$_\nu$=63 mJY at 6.75$\mu$M (4.44$\tImes 10^{4}$GHz), and for a Wn-typE wind (wherE thE mEan AtOmic wEIght peR nuCleOn $\mu$=1.5, the Number oF FreE eLECTrOns per nucleon $\gamma_E$=1 aND ThE mean ionIc charGE Z=1), AnD With a velOcIty Of v$_\iNFTy$= 1500km.s$^{-1}$ (Van KERkWijk 1996), one oBtains m=1.2$\TiMeS$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.yR$^{-1}$. THis is iN aGreEmeNt witH The mAss traNsfer ratE estiMAted by @ker96 and (wiTHin a factor of 2) bY @OgL01. tHiS ResuLt iS in good agreEmenT With The rECeNt rEVised wN masS-lOSs RAte estimates, which haVe Been
 compact object in CygnusX -3, a late r typ e t han  s ugge sted  by earlier wo r ks [ @ker96; @fen99; @han00 ].

M as s  los s  r ate e valuati o n- - --- -- -- --- -- - -- ----- --- 

As @o gl01, we e val ua ted the mass lo ss rate of  th is free-free  em itting  w ind ,  foll owi ng th e @wri 7 5 form ula (8) g iv i ng the emitted f lu x de nsity (in Jansky) by a stellar wind  assum ed to b e s phe rical, hom og eneou s  and at ac o n sta n t velocity :$$\centerin g  
      \ mat h rm{S}_ \nu \ ,= \,23.2 \, 
        \left (\frac { \dot{\m a thrm{M} }}{\mu  \m ath rm{v } _\ in fty }\ r igh t )^ {4/ 3 }         \\frac {\nu ^ { 2 / 3}}{  \m athr m{D}_  \mathrm{kpc} ^2}  
       \   \ga mma^ {2 /3}\, \mathr m{g}^ {2 /3}\,\mathrm{Z} ^{4/ 3} \quad\ma th rm{ Jy }$$ w h ere Disthe  distan ce to t h e s ou r c e  i n kpc. It gives :$$ \ c en tering       \ do t {\mathrm {M }}\ , =\ , 5.35. 10^{ - 7}  \, \mat hrm{S} _ \n u^ {3/4}\, 
           (\nu _  \ma thrm{G Hz}\, \g amma\ ,  \mathrm{Z^2}) ^ {-1/2} \,
        \m u\,\mathrm{ v}_\ i nfty  \qu a d\ma t hrm{M _\odo t. y r^ { -1}}$$ (where $\nu$  i s in G Hz).With an assum ed distanc e D =10kpc,a Ga u nt factor g=1, afluxdensity de d uced fro m the  continu um fittin g (@lut96law , F ig.  3) o fS$_\nu$=63 mJ y at 6 .7 5$\mu$m  (4 .44$\ti mes  10 ^{4 }$G Hz ), and fo r a WN-t yp ewi nd  (w heret he meanat omi cwei ght p e r nucl eon $ \mu$ =1 .5 ,  th e numbe r  o f free  e le ctro nspe r nuc leon $\g amma_e$ =1 and th e m e an i on ic  charge  Z=1), and wi th  a velocit yofv$_\in f t y$= 1500 km.s$^{-1}$ (van Kerkwi j k 1996) , o ne ob tain s M=1.2$\ tim es$$10 ^{- 4 }$[M$_ {\odot }$]{} .y r$^ { - 1}$.T h is  is  i n agreemen t wit h the  m asstransfe r rate estimated b y  @k er96 and (wit hin  a f a c to r o f  2 )  by  @ o gl0 1 .  This result is  in good a gr e em ent with t h e r ec ent rev ised WN  mass - loss ra te estima tes, whic hhave b een 
 compact_object in_CygnusX-3, a later type_than suggested_by_earlier works_[@ker96;_@fen99; @han00].

Mass loss_rate evaluation
-------------------------

As @ogl01,_we evaluated the mass_loss rate of_this_free-free emitting wind, following the @wri75 formula (8) giving the emitted flux density (in_Jansky)_by a_stellar_wind_assumed to be spherical, homogeneous_and at a constant velocity_: $$\centering_
       _\mathrm{S}_\nu_\, =\, 23.2_\, 
       _  \left(\frac{\dot{\mathrm{M}}}{\mu \mathrm{v}_\infty}\right)^{4/3} 
 _  ___   \_\frac{\nu^{2/3}}{ \mathrm{D}_ \mathrm{kpc}^2} 
  _     _ \  \gamma^{2/3}\,\mathrm{g}^{2/3}\,\mathrm{Z}^{4/3} \quad \mathrm{Jy}$$ where_D is the distance to the_source in kpc. It gives_: $$\centering_
    _  _\dot{\mathrm{M}}\, =\,_5.35.10^{-7} \, \mathrm{S}_\nu^{3/4}\,
_     _  _     _(\nu__\mathrm{GHz}\, \gamma\, \mathrm{Z^2})^{-1/2}_\,
__ _  __ __     \mu\,\mathrm{v}_\infty_\quad_\mathrm{M_\odot.yr^{-1}}$$ (where $\nu$ is in GHz). With_an assumed distance D=10kpc,_a_Gaunt factor g=1, a_flux density deduced from the_continuum fitting (@lut96 law, Fig. 3) of_S$_\nu$=63 mJy_at 6.75$\mu$m_(4.44$\times 10^{4}$GHz), and for a WN-type wind (where the mean atomic_weight per nucleon $\mu$=1.5, the number_of free electrons per_nucleon $\gamma_e$=1_and_the mean ionic_charge_Z=1), and_with a velocity of v$_\infty$= 1500km.s$^{-1}$ (van_Kerkwijk 1996),_one obtains M=1.2$\times$$10^{-4}$[M$_{\odot}$]{}.yr$^{-1}$. This is in_agreement with the mass_transfer_rate estimated by @ker96 and (within_a factor of 2) by @ogl01._This result is in good_agreement_with_the recent revised WN mass-loss_rate estimates, which have been