s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ be a Cayley graph of $G$ with weights $\omega(s_i)=\omega_i$. Then the coefficient of $\sigma\in G$ in the element $(\omega_1s_1+ \omega_2s_2+ \cdots +\omega_rs_{r})^d$ of the group algebra ${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$ equals $$\sum_{w\in w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)}\omega(w),$$ where $w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)$ is the set of words of length $d$ which reduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma$.

Let us first prove by induction on $d$ that when the weight of each generator is one, the number of words of length $d$ which reduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ is equal to the coefficient of $\sigma$ in the element $(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})^d$ of ${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$. Note that there is an edge from $\gamma$ to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(G,\{s_1, s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\}) $ if and only if the coefficient of $\sigma$ in $\gamma (s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$ is one. Therefore if $d=1$, the number of paths of length one from $e$ to $\sigma$ is equal to the coefficient of $\sigma$ in $(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$. Let us write $s=(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$ to simplify the notation. Now if $d>1$, let $$s^d=c_{\sigma} \sigma+\sum_{\tau\in G \atop \tau\neq \sigma}c_{\tau} \tau.$$ We want to show that the number of paths of length $d$ from $e$ to $\sigma$ is equal to $c_{\sigma}$. By induction hypothesis, the coefficient $c'_{\gamma} $ of $\gamma$ in $s^{d-1}$ is equal to the number of paths of length $d-1$ from $e$ to $\gamma$, hence $$\sum_{\underbrace{\scriptstyle e
s_2, \ldots, s_{r}\})$ be a Cayley graph of $ G$ with weights $ \omega(s_i)=\omega_i$. Then the coefficient of $ \sigma\in G$ in the element $ (\omega_1s_1 + \omega_2s_2 + \cdots + \omega_rs_{r})^d$ of the group algebra $ { \ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$ equals $ $ \sum_{w\in w(\sigma, d; \Gamma)}\omega(w),$$ where $ w(\sigma, d; \Gamma)$ is the hardening of son of length $ d$ which reduce to $ \sigma$ in $ \Gamma$. 

 Let us foremost prove by induction on $ d$ that when the weight of each generator is one, the act of words of length $ d$ which shrink to $ \sigma$ in $ \Gamma(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldots, s_{r}\})$ is equal to the coefficient of $ \sigma$ in the element $ (s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_{r})^d$ of $ { \ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$. Note that there be an edge from $ \gamma$ to $ \sigma$ in $ \Gamma(G,\{s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_{r}\ }) $ if and only if the coefficient of $ \sigma$ in $ \gamma (s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_{r})$ is one. consequently if $ d=1 $, the number of paths of length one from $ e$ to $ \sigma$ is equal to the coefficient of $ \sigma$ in $ (s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_{r})$. Let us write $ s=(s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_{r})$ to simplify the notation. nowadays if $ d>1 $, let $ $ s^d = c_{\sigma } \sigma+\sum_{\tau\in G \atop \tau\neq \sigma}c_{\tau } \tau.$$ We want to express that the number of paths of length $ d$ from $ e$ to $ \sigma$ is equal to $ c_{\sigma}$. By initiation hypothesis, the coefficient $ c'_{\gamma } $ of $ \gamma$ in $ s^{d-1}$ is equal to the number of paths of length $ d-1 $ from $ e$ to $ \gamma$, therefore $ $ \sum_{\underbrace{\scriptstyle e
s_2, \lfots,s_{r}\})$ be a Cayley graph of $G$ with weigkrs $\omeja(s_i)=\omefa_i$. Then the coefficient of $\sigma\in J$ in the tjement $(\omega_1s_1+ \omegx_2s_2+ \cdots +\lmega_rs_{r})^e$ of rhe group emgebra ${\cusurejwth{\mctidj{C}}}G$ equals $$\suk_{w\in w(\sigmd,d; \Gamma)}\omega(w),$$ wfexe $w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)$ is the set of words of lenbtj $d$ which reduse tp $\sigja$ in $\Gamma$.

Let us first prove by ihductioi on $d$ that whem the weight of each generwtor is one, the number of words od legtth $d$ which feduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamja(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ is equal to the cueffieient of $\sitmq$ ij the elemenv $(s_1+ s_2+ \bdots +s_{r})^d$ of ${\cmsuremdth{\mathcj{C}}}G$. Note that thxre us an edge from $\gamma$ to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(D,\{s_1, s_2, \ldotv,s_{x}\}) $ if and only if the cieffiwiend of $\wigoa$ jn $\gzmma (s_1+ s_2+ \rdots +s_{r})$ is one. Therefire if $d=1$, the number os paths of lenfth onq srom $e$ to $\sigma$ is equal to the coefficpent of $\sigma$ in $(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +w_{r})$. Let us write $s=(s_1+ s_2+ \fdots +s_{r})$ eo simplify the notation. Now if $d>1$, let $$s^d=c_{\sigma} \sicma+\suj_{\gau\nk E \ahop \tau\neq \sigma}c_{\tau} \tau.$$ We want to show that fht nlmber of paths of length $d$ ftol $r$ to $\sigma$ is gqual to $c_{\aigma}$. By induction hypothgsis, tye coeffisieny $c'_{\gamma} $ of $\gamma$ in $s^{d-1}$ is equal to thv nunber of paths of lzngth $d-1$ from $e$ tp $\gamka$, hence $$\sum_{\underbrace{\seriptsfyle e
s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ be a Cayley graph of weights Then the of $\sigma\in G$ \cdots of the group ${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$ equals $$\sum_{w\in \Gamma)}\omega(w),$$ where $w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)$ is the of words of length $d$ which reduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma$. Let us prove by induction on $d$ that when the weight of each generator is the of of $d$ which reduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ is equal to the coefficient of $\sigma$ in element $(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})^d$ of ${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$. Note there is an edge $\gamma$ to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(G,\{s_1, \ldots,s_{r}\}) if and if coefficient $\sigma$ in $\gamma s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$ is one. Therefore if $d=1$, the number of paths of length one from $e$ $\sigma$ is the coefficient $\sigma$ $(s_1+ \cdots +s_{r})$. Let $s=(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$ to simplify if $d>1$, let $$s^d=c_{\sigma} \sigma+\sum_{\tau\in G \atop \tau\neq \tau.$$ We to show that the number of of length $d$ from $e$ to $\sigma$ is to $c_{\sigma}$. By induction hypothesis, the coefficient $c'_{\gamma} $ of $\gamma$ in $s^{d-1}$ is equal number of paths of $d-1$ from $e$ $\gamma$, $$\sum_{\underbrace{\scriptstyle
s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ be a Cayley graph of $G$ With weightS $\omegA(s_i)=\OmeGa_I$. TheN the Coefficient of $\sIGma\iN G$ in the element $(\omega_1s_1+ \omEga_2s_2+ \cDoTS +\omeGA_rS_{r})^d$ of The grouP AlGEBra ${\EnSuRemAtH{\MaThdj{C}}}g$ eqUals $$\sum_{W\in w(\sigma,d; \gamMa)}\Omega(w),$$ where $w(\SIgMa,d; \Gamma)$ is The Set of words of LenGth $d$ whIcH reDUce to $\SigMa$ in $\GAmma$.

LeT Us firsT prove by iNdUCtion oN $D$ that whEN ThE weiGht of each generatoR Is ONe, the number of wOrds of LeNGtH $D$ WhiCh rEduce to $\sigMa$ In $\GamMA(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldoTS,s_{R}\})$ IS EquAL to the coefficIent of $\sigma$ IN thE elemeNt $(S_1+ s_2+ \cDOts +s_{r})^d$ Of ${\ensUrEMatH{\mathdj{C}}}G$. NoTe thAt there is An edge FRom $\gammA$ To $\sigma$ In $\GammA(G,\{s_1, S_2, \ldOts,s_{R}\}) $ If AnD onLy IF thE CoEffICieNt of $\sigmA$ iN $\gAmma (s_1+ S_2+ \cdoTS +S_{R})$ Is onE. ThErefOre if $D=1$, the number of pAthS of lENgtH one fRom $e$ tO $\sigMa$ Is equAl to thE coefFiCient of $\sigma$ in $(s_1+ S_2+ \cdoTs +s_{r})$. Let us WriTe $S=(s_1+ s_2+ \CdOts +s_{r})$ TO simplIfy The NotatioN. Now if $d>1$, LEt $$s^D=c_{\SIGMa} \Sigma+\sum_{\tau\in G \atop \TaU\NEq \Sigma}c_{\taU} \tau.$$ We WAnT tO Show that ThE nuMber OF Paths Of leNGtH $d$ from $e$ tO $\sigma$ IS eQuAl to $c_{\siGmA}$. By indUcTioN hyPotheSIs, thE coeffIcient $c'_{\gAmma} $ oF $\Gamma$ in $s^{d-1}$ is equAL to the number oF PaTHS oF LengTh $d-1$ From $e$ to $\gammA$, henCE $$\sum_{\UndeRBrAce{\SCriptStyle E
s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$ be a  Cayley gr aph o f $ G$wi th w eigh ts $\omega(s_i ) =\om ega_i$. Then the coeff icien to f $\ s ig ma\in  G$ int he e lem en t$(\ om e ga _1s_1 + \ omega_2 s_2+ \cdot s + \o mega_rs_{r}) ^ d$  of the gr oup  algebra ${\ ens uremat h{ \ma t hdj{C }}} G$ eq uals $ $ \sum_{ w\in w(\s ig m a,d; \ G amma)}\ o m eg a(w) ,$$ where $w(\sig m a, d ; \Gamma)$ isthe se to fw o rds  of  length $d $which reducet o$ \ s igm a $ in $\Gamma$ .

Let us f i rst  prove  b y i n ductio n on$d $  th at when the  wei ght of ea ch gen e rator i s  one, t he num ber  of  wor d sof  le ng t h $ d $whi c h r educe to  $ \s igma$  in$ \ G a mma( G,\ {s_1 ,s_2,  \ldots,s_{r} \}) $ is equ al to  thecoef fi cient  of $\ sigma $in the element$(s_ 1+ s_2+ \ cdo ts  +s _{ r})^d $  of ${ \en sur emath{\ mathdj{ C }}} G$ . N ot e that there is an  e d g efrom $\g amma$t o$\ s igma$ in  $ \Ga mma( G , \{s_1 , s_ 2 ,\ldots,s _{r}\} )  $  i f and o nl y if t he  co eff icien t  of$\sigm a$ in $\ gamma (s_1+ s_2+ \cd o ts +s_{r})$ i s  o n e .T here for e if $d=1$,  the numb er o f  p ath s  of l ength  o n ef rom $e$ to $\sigma$  i s equa l tothe coefficie nt of $\si g m a $ in $(s _1+s _2 +  \cdots +s_{r} )$. L et us writ e  $s=(s_1 + s_2 + \cdots  +s_{r})$ t o simpli fythe  no tat i o n.  Now if $d>1$ , let$$ s^d=c_{ \si gma} \s igm a+\ sum _{\ ta u\in G \a top \tau \n eq  \ si gma }c_{\ t au} \tau .$ $ W ewan t tos how th at th e nu mb er ofpaths o f  l e n gth$d $from  $e $to $\ sigm a $ i s equal  to $c_{\ sig m a}$.  B yinducti on hypothesis ,the coeffi ci ent  $c'_{ \ g amma} $of $\gamma$ in $s^{d-1} $  is equ alto th e nu mber of p ath s of l eng t h $d-1 $ from  $e$to  $\ g a mma$, h en ce$$ \sum_{\und e r bra ce{\s cr ipts tyle e
s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$_be a_Cayley graph of $G$_with weights_$\omega(s_i)=\omega_i$._Then the_coefficient_of $\sigma\in G$_in the element_$(\omega_1s_1+ \omega_2s_2+ \cdots +\omega_rs_{r})^d$_of the group_algebra_${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$ equals $$\sum_{w\in w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)}\omega(w),$$ where $w(\sigma,d; \Gamma)$ is the set of words of_length_$d$ which_reduce_to_$\sigma$ in $\Gamma$.

Let us first_prove by induction on $d$_that when_the weight of each generator is one, the_number_of words of_length $d$ which reduce to $\sigma$ in $\Gamma(G,\{s_1,s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\})$_is equal to the coefficient of_$\sigma$ in the_element_$(s_1+_s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})^d$ of_${\ensuremath{\mathdj{C}}}G$. Note that there is an_edge from $\gamma$ to $\sigma$ in_$\Gamma(G,\{s_1, s_2, \ldots,s_{r}\}) $ if and only_if the coefficient of $\sigma$ in_$\gamma (s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$_is one._Therefore if $d=1$, the number_of paths of_length one_from $e$ to_$\sigma$ is equal to the coefficient_of $\sigma$ in_$(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots +s_{r})$. Let us_write_$s=(s_1+ s_2+ \cdots_+s_{r})$_to_simplify the_notation. Now if_$d>1$,_let $$s^d=c_{\sigma}_\sigma+\sum_{\tau\in_G \atop \tau\neq \sigma}c_{\tau} \tau.$$ We_want_to show that the number of paths_of length $d$ from_$e$_to $\sigma$ is equal_to $c_{\sigma}$. By induction hypothesis,_the coefficient $c'_{\gamma} $ of $\gamma$_in $s^{d-1}$_is equal_to the number of paths of length $d-1$ from $e$ to_$\gamma$, hence $$\sum_{\underbrace{\scriptstyle e