 process. The discussion here will be developed based on the understanding that we are with observations relating to a discrete-time process. However, it is also possible to perform such analysis at the individual event level, for examples, see the work of [@Cohen2014; @Jarvis2001; @Brillinger1972].

To simplify the notation, let us use $X_{1}[k]\equiv X_{AB}[k]$ and $X_{2}[k]\equiv X_{BC}[k]$. Furthermore, we will assume that $\{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ represent a jointly second-order stationary process, i.e. the covariance $\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mathrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\tau],X_{j}[k])$ only depends on $\tau$ for $i,j=1,2$. Provided $\sum_{\tau}|\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]|<\infty$, then for all frequencies $|\omega|\le \pi/\Delta$, the function $S_{ij}(\omega)=\Delta\sum_{\tau=-\infty}^{\infty}\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]e^{-i\omega\tau\Delta}$, $i,j=1,2$, is termed the spectum of $\{X_i[k]\}$ when $i=j$, and the *cross-spectrum* between $\{X_{1}[k]\}$ and $\{X_{2}[k]\}$ when $i\neq j$. These spectra can be conveniently represented with the spectral matrix $\boldsymbol{S}(\omega) = (S_{ij}(\omega))$. The argument we present in this paper, is that the cross-spectrum provides a rich framework within which we may characterise computer network messaging processes. In particular, since we are interested in dependency between data-streams, we will concern ourselves with the squared coherencey, or ordinary coherence, defined as the real-valued quantity $$R(\omega)=\frac{|S_{12}(\omega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\omega)S_{12}(\omega)}\;.\label{eq:Coherence_def}$$ The coherence provides a useful statistic for assessing dependency between point-processes; not only does it permit a decomposition over frequencies allowing one to highlight periodicities associated with dependence, but is also invariant to scaling of the marginal auto-covariance as the measure is normalised by the on-diagonal spectra.

Estimating the Spectra of Point-Processes

process. The discussion here will be developed based on the understanding that we are with observation relate to a discrete - time process. However, it is also potential to perform such analysis at the individual event floor, for examples, see the employment of [ @Cohen2014; @Jarvis2001; @Brillinger1972 ]. 

 To simplify the notation, let us practice $ X_{1}[k]\equiv X_{AB}[k]$ and $ X_{2}[k]\equiv X_{BC}[k]$. Furthermore, we will assume that $ \{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ represent a jointly second - order stationary process, i.e. the covariance $ \Sigma_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mathrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\tau],X_{j}[k])$ merely depends on $ \tau$ for $ i, j=1,2$. Provided $ \sum_{\tau}|\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]|<\infty$, then for all frequencies $ |\omega|\le \pi/\Delta$, the function $ S_{ij}(\omega)=\Delta\sum_{\tau=-\infty}^{\infty}\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]e^{-i\omega\tau\Delta}$, $ i, j=1,2 $, is termed the spectum of $ \{X_i[k]\}$ when $ i = j$, and the * crabbed - spectrum * between $ \{X_{1}[k]\}$ and $ \{X_{2}[k]\}$ when $ i\neq j$. These spectra can be conveniently represented with the apparitional matrix $ \boldsymbol{S}(\omega) = (S_{ij}(\omega))$. The argument we present in this paper, is that the cross - spectrum provides a fat framework within which we may characterise computer network messaging process. In particular, since we are interested in dependency between data - streams, we will refer ourselves with the squared coherencey, or average coherence, specify as the real - valued quantity $ $ R(\omega)=\frac{|S_{12}(\omega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\omega)S_{12}(\omega)}\;.\label{eq: Coherence_def}$$ The coherence provides a useful statistic for assessing colony between detail - processes; not only does it allow a decay over frequency allowing one to highlight periodicities associated with dependence, but is also invariant to scaling of the bare auto - covariance as the measure is normalised by the on - diagonal spectra. 

 Estimating the Spectra of Point - Processes
 prlcess. The discussion hert will be developgd based on ths undersganding that we are with obsxrvarions relating to a discretd-time probess. Howecer, mt is also possiume to pcxform duch enalysis at the individuan event level, xof zxamples, see the work of [@Cohen2014; @Jarvif2001; @Brillonher1972].

To simplify the gotafpok, let us use $X_{1}[k]\equiv X_{AB}[k]$ and $X_{2}[k]\squiv X_{UC}[k]$. Furthermore, we will assume that $\{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ geprfsent a jointly sefond-order sjztijbary process, i.e. the concriance $\Sigja_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mathrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\tau],X_{j}[k])$ unly bepends on $\jcy$ flt $i,j=1,2$. Providev $\sum_{\twu}|\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]|<\lmfty$, tven for all frequencics $|\omxga|\lw \pi/\Delta$, the functioi $S_{ij}(\omega)=\Delta\sum_{\tao=-\infty}^{\inftf}\Sngma_{ij}[\tau]e^{-i\omega\tau\Deotq}$, $i,j=1,2$, hs tarmea thd skecvum of $\{X_i[n]\}$ wien $i=j$, and fhe *cross-spwctrum* between $\{X_{1}[k]\}$ amd $\{Q_{2}[l]\}$ when $i\neq n$. Thesq fpectra can be conveniently represented wifh the spectral matrix $\voldsymbol{S}(\omega) = (S_{ij}(\lmega))$. The argument we present in this paper, is that the crmss-spxcgrun irovkeed a rich framework within which we may characesrosv computer networh messaging pgovgsses. In partizular, sinde we are interestfd in dgpendebcy betwetn daya-streams, we will concern oyrselves witk tye squared cohereneey, or ordincry conerenve, defined as the real-vclued suantity $$R(\olega)=\frac{|S_{12}(\koega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\omega)S_{12}(\omega)}\;.\uabvl{eq:Woherenct_aef}$$ The coherence provides a uxeful sgatixtic fjr assessijg deiandency between polnt-prlcasses; not lnly does it permit a decomposivmon over freqoenwiev allowiug one to highlight periodicities associcted wkth dependvnce, but ms also invawiant to scalhjg of the macginal aueo-cocariqnce as ghe measure is normalisvd by rhe on-diagonal spegtra.

Erfimating the Spzettq of Point-Procrssds

process. The discussion here will be developed the that we with observations relating it also possible to such analysis at individual event level, for examples, see work of [@Cohen2014; @Jarvis2001; @Brillinger1972]. To simplify the notation, let us use $X_{1}[k]\equiv and $X_{2}[k]\equiv X_{BC}[k]$. Furthermore, we will assume that $\{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ represent a jointly second-order process, the $\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mathrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\tau],X_{j}[k])$ depends on $\tau$ for $i,j=1,2$. Provided $\sum_{\tau}|\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]|<\infty$, then for all frequencies $|\omega|\le \pi/\Delta$, the function $S_{ij}(\omega)=\Delta\sum_{\tau=-\infty}^{\infty}\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]e^{-i\omega\tau\Delta}$, is termed the spectum of $\{X_i[k]\}$ when $i=j$, the *cross-spectrum* between $\{X_{1}[k]\}$ $\{X_{2}[k]\}$ when $i\neq j$. These can conveniently represented the matrix = (S_{ij}(\omega))$. The we present in this paper, is that the cross-spectrum provides a rich framework within which we may computer network In particular, we interested dependency between data-streams, concern ourselves with the squared coherencey, defined as the real-valued quantity $$R(\omega)=\frac{|S_{12}(\omega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\omega)S_{12}(\omega)}\;.\label{eq:Coherence_def}$$ The coherence a useful for assessing dependency between point-processes; not does it permit a decomposition over frequencies allowing to highlight periodicities associated with dependence, but is also invariant to scaling of the marginal the measure is normalised the on-diagonal spectra. the of
 process. The discussion here wIll be develOped bAseD on ThE undErstAnding that we arE With Observations relating to A discReTE-timE PrOcess. however, IT iS ALso PoSsIblE tO PeRform SucH analysIs at the indIviDuAl event level, FOr Examples, seE thE work of [@Cohen2014; @jarVis2001; @BriLlIngER1972].

To siMplIfy thE notatIOn, let uS use $X_{1}[k]\equIv x_{aB}[k]$ and $x_{2}[K]\equiv X_{bc}[K]$. FUrthErmore, we will assumE ThAT $\{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ represent A jointLy SEcOND-orDer Stationary PrOcess, I.E. the covARiANCE $\SiGMa_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mAthrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\TAu],X_{J}[k])$ only DePenDS on $\tau$ For $i,j=1,2$. prOVidEd $\sum_{\tau}|\SigMa_{ij}[\Tau]|<\infty$, tHen for ALl frequENcies $|\omEga|\le \pI/\DeLta$, The fUNcTiOn $S_{Ij}(\OMegA)=\deLta\SUm_{\tAu=-\infty}^{\iNfTy}\sigma_{Ij}[\taU]E^{-I\OMega\Tau\deltA}$, $i,j=1,2$, is Termed the specTum Of $\{X_i[K]\}$ WheN $i=j$, anD the *cRoss-SpEctruM* betweEn $\{X_{1}[k]\}$ aNd $\{x_{2}[k]\}$ when $i\neq j$. ThesE speCtra can be ConVeNieNtLy repREsenteD wiTh tHe spectRal matrIX $\boLdSYMBoL{S}(\omega) = (S_{ij}(\omega))$. The ArGUMeNt we presEnt in tHIs PaPEr, is that ThE crOss-sPECtrum ProvIDeS a rich frAmeworK WiThIn which We May chaRaCteRisE compUTer nEtwork MessaginG procESses. In particulAR, since we are inTErESTeD In dePenDency betweeN datA-StreAms, wE WiLl cONcern OurseLvES wITh the squared coherenCeY, or ordInary Coherence, defiNed as the reAL-VAlued quaNtitY $$r(\oMEga)=\frac{|S_{12}(\omega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\Omega)s_{12}(\omega)}\;.\labeL{Eq:CohereNce_deF}$$ The coheRence provIDEs a usefuL stAtiStiC foR ASsEssing dependeNCY betWeEn point-ProCesses; nOt oNly DoeS it PeRmit a decoMpositioN oVeR fReQueNcies ALlowing oNe To hIgHliGht peRIodiciTies aSsocIaTeD WitH dependENcE, BUt is AlSo InvaRiaNt To scaLing OF thE marginAl auto-covAriANce aS tHe Measure Is normalised bY tHe on-diagonAl SpeCtra.

EsTIMating thE Spectra of Point-ProcesseS

 process. The discussion h ere will b e dev elo ped  b ased  onthe understand i ng t hat we are with observ ation sr elat i ng  to a  discre t e- t i mepr oc ess .H ow ever,  it  is als o possible  to  p erform sucha na lysis at t heindividual e ven t leve l,  fo r  exam ple s, se e thew ork of  [@Cohen2 01 4 ; @Jar v is2001; @ Br illi nger1972].

To si m pl i fy the notatio n, let  u s  u s e  $X _{1 }[k]\equiv  X _{AB} [ k]$ and $X _ { 2 }[k ] \equiv X_{BC} [k]$. Furth e rmo re, we  w ill assume  that  $ \ {X_ {1}[k],X_{2 }[k] \}$ repre sent a jointly second- ordersta tio nary pr oc ess ,i .e. th e c o var iance $\ Si gm a_{ij }[\t a u ] \ equi v\m athr m{Cov }(X_{i}[k+\ta u], X_{j } [k] )$ on ly de pend son $\ tau$ f or $i ,j =1,2$. Provided  $\s um_{\tau} |\S ig ma_ {i j}[\t a u]|<\i nft y$,  then f or allf req ue n c i es  $|\omega|\le \pi/ \D e l ta $, the f unctio n  $ S_ { ij}(\ome ga )=\ Delt a \ sum_{ \tau = -\ infty}^{ \infty } \S ig ma_{ij} [\ tau]e^ {- i\o meg a\tau \ Delt a}$, $ i,j=1,2$ , ist ermed the spec t um of $\{X_i[ k ]\ } $  w h en $ i=j $, and the*cro s s-sp ectr u m*  be t ween$\{X_ {1 } [k ] \}$ and $\{X_{2}[k] \} $ when  $i\n eq j$. Thesespectra ca n b e conven ient l yr epresented wit h the  spectralm atrix $\ bolds ymbol{S} (\omega)= (S_{ij}( \om ega ))$ . T h e  a rgument we pr e s entin  this p ape r, is t hat  th e c ros s- spectrumprovides  a  r ic hfra mewor k  withinwh ich  w e m ay ch a racter ise c ompu te rn etw ork mes s ag i n g pr oc es ses.  In  p artic ular ,  si nce weare inter est e d in  d ep endency  between data -s treams, we  w ill  conce r n  ourselv es with the squared coh e rencey,  or  ordi nary  coherenc e,define d a s  the r eal-va luedqu ant i t y $$R ( \ om ega )= \frac{|S_{ 1 2 }(\ omega )| ^{2} }{S_{11 }(\omega)S_{12}(\o m ega )}\;.\label{e q:C oher e n ce _de f }$ $  Th ec ohe r e nce provides auseful sta ti s ti c for asse s sin gdepende ncy bet weenp oint-pr ocesses;not onlydo es i t per mit a deco mpositio n over fr e quenc i es  allo win g oneto  hi ghlig ht per i odi citie s asso ci ated w ith d ep endence,  but is also invariantto sca lingofthe margi nal aut o-covaria nceas the mea sur e i s nor mal i sed b y th e  o n-d i agona l sp e ctra.

Es t im ati n g  t he Spectrao f Poi nt-Pr oce s ses

 process._The discussion_here will be developed_based on_the_understanding that_we_are with observations_relating to a_discrete-time process. However, it_is also possible_to_perform such analysis at the individual event level, for examples, see the work of_[@Cohen2014;_@Jarvis2001; @Brillinger1972].

To_simplify_the_notation, let us use $X_{1}[k]\equiv_X_{AB}[k]$ and $X_{2}[k]\equiv X_{BC}[k]$. Furthermore,_we will_assume that $\{X_{1}[k],X_{2}[k]\}$ represent a jointly second-order stationary_process,_i.e. the covariance_$\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]\equiv\mathrm{Cov}(X_{i}[k+\tau],X_{j}[k])$ only depends on $\tau$ for $i,j=1,2$. Provided $\sum_{\tau}|\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]|<\infty$,_then for all frequencies $|\omega|\le \pi/\Delta$,_the function $S_{ij}(\omega)=\Delta\sum_{\tau=-\infty}^{\infty}\Sigma_{ij}[\tau]e^{-i\omega\tau\Delta}$,_$i,j=1,2$,_is_termed the spectum of_$\{X_i[k]\}$ when $i=j$, and the *cross-spectrum*_between $\{X_{1}[k]\}$ and $\{X_{2}[k]\}$ when $i\neq_j$. These spectra can be conveniently represented_with the spectral matrix $\boldsymbol{S}(\omega) =_(S_{ij}(\omega))$. The argument we present_in this_paper, is that the cross-spectrum_provides a rich_framework within_which we may_characterise computer network messaging processes. In_particular, since we_are interested in dependency between data-streams,_we_will concern ourselves_with_the_squared coherencey,_or ordinary coherence,_defined_as the_real-valued_quantity $$R(\omega)=\frac{|S_{12}(\omega)|^{2}}{S_{11}(\omega)S_{12}(\omega)}\;.\label{eq:Coherence_def}$$ The coherence provides a_useful_statistic for assessing dependency between point-processes; not_only does it permit_a_decomposition over frequencies allowing_one to highlight periodicities associated_with dependence, but is also invariant_to scaling_of the_marginal auto-covariance as the measure is normalised by the on-diagonal spectra.

Estimating_the Spectra of Point-Processes
