 in the isospace). Upon substituting the decomposition (4) into (1) one separates terms containing the non-static fields up to second power, for the 1-loop integration. The piece depending only on the constant background takes the form: $$U^{(0)}=\beta V\bigl [{1\over 4}g^2(A_i\times A_j)^2+{1\over 2}
g^2(A_i\times A_4)^2+{1\over 8}g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)\Phi_0^{\dagger}
\Phi_0+V(\Phi_0)\bigr ]$$ (i=1,2,3). The part quadratic in the non-static components will not be displayed explicitly, since its expression is lengthy and not enlightening. The only important point for us is, that the fluctuations are characterised by a $16\times 16$ matrix, because the 12 gauge field components and 4 real Higgs scalar components are fully coupled in the most general constant background.

The gauge fixing conditions imposed on the fluctuations $a_{m},
\xi_{\alpha} $ are $$\begin{aligned}
&
F^1 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_2,\nonumber \\ &
F^2 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^2-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_1,\nonumber \\ &
F^3 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^3+\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_4,\end{aligned}$$ ($D_{\mu}(A)$ is the covariant derivative in the background field $A$, $\alpha$ is the gauge fixing parameter). The corresponding Faddeev-Popov determinant is $$\det \{ [K^2 +g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)+{\alpha \over 4}g^2\Phi_0^2 ]\delta^{a,b}-
2ig\epsilon^{abc}K_mA_m^c-g^2A_m^aA_m^b)\},$$ where $K^2 ={\bf k}^2+\omega_n^2$.

Since the distinguishing difference of the proposed method relative to the conventional Fe
in the isospace). Upon substituting the decomposition (4) into (1) one separates terms control the non - inactive fields up to second power, for the 1 - loop consolidation. The piece depending only on the changeless background takes the kind: $ $ U^{(0)}=\beta V\bigl [ { 1\over 4}g^2(A_i\times A_j)^2+{1\over 2 } 
 g^2(A_i\times A_4)^2+{1\over 8}g^2(A_i^2+A_4 ^ 2)\Phi_0^{\dagger } 
 \Phi_0+V(\Phi_0)\bigr ] $ $ (i=1,2,3). The part quadratic in the non - static component will not be displayed explicitly, since its expression is drawn-out and not enlightening. The only authoritative point for us is, that the fluctuations are characterize by a $ 16\times 16 $ matrix, because the 12 gauge field components and 4 veridical Higgs scalar components are fully coupled in the about general ceaseless background. 

 The gauge fixing condition imposed on the fluctuations $ a_{m }, 
 \xi_{\alpha } $ are $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 & 
 F^1 =( D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_2,\nonumber \\ & 
 F^2 =( D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^2-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_1,\nonumber \\ & 
 F^3 =( D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^3+\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_4,\end{aligned}$$ ($ D_{\mu}(A)$ is the covariant derivative in the background field $ A$, $ \alpha$ is the bore repair parameter). The corresponding Faddeev - Popov determinant is $ $ \det \ { [ K^2 + g^2(A_i^2+A_4 ^ 2)+{\alpha \over 4}g^2\Phi_0 ^ 2 ] \delta^{a, b}- 
 2ig\epsilon^{abc}K_mA_m^c - g^2A_m^aA_m^b)\},$$ where $ K^2 = { \bf k}^2+\omega_n^2$. 

 Since the distinguishing difference of the proposed method relative to the conventional Fe
 in the isospace). Upon substltuting the decompositimn (4) info (1) one reparates terms containing tie nin-staupc fields up to secona power, flr the 1-liop mntegration. The 'jece deizndinf onlv in the constanj background takes the fork: $$J^{(0)}=\bzta V\bigl [{1\over 4}g^2(A_i\times A_j)^2+{1\over 2}
g^2(A_i\tiies A_4)^2+{1\ovrr 8}g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)\Phi_0^{\dagger}
\Khi_0+V(\Pny_0)\bigd ]$$ (i=1,2,3). The part quadratic in the non-atatic bomponents will npt be displayed explicitly, sinfe its expression ls lengthy qnd git enlightenkng. The only important point for us is, that the fluctjatious are charqcrerlved by a $16\tines 16$ iatrix, because the 12 cauge foeld componentx aid 4 eeal Higgs scalar com'onents are fully coopled in tve most general conwtqnt bdckgsouna.

Rhe gahgx fjxing fonvitions impksed on the fluctuations $a_{m},
\xi_{\akprq} $ are $$\begin{amigned}
&
S^1 =(Q_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_2,\nonumber \\ &
F^2 =(D_{\mu}(A)d_{\mu})^2-\zlpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_1,\nonumbee \\ &
F^3 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^3+\alpha{g\Phi_0\lver 2}\xi_4,\enq{aligned}$$ ($D_{\mu}(A)$ is the covariant derivative in the tackgcojnd fleld $Q$, $\wlpha$ is the gauge fixing parameter). The correflomdpng Faddeev-Popov beterminant is $$\drt \{ [L^2 +g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)+{\alpha \ovgr 4}g^2\Phi_0^2 ]\demta^{a,b}-
2ig\epsilon^{abc}K_lA_m^c-g^2A_m^wA_m^b)\},$$ qhere $K^2 ={\bs k}^2+\okega_n^2$.

Since the distinguishibg differencv of the proposed methld relative to jhe comventional Fe
in the isospace). Upon substituting the decomposition (1) separates terms the non-static fields the integration. The piece only on the background takes the form: $$U^{(0)}=\beta V\bigl 4}g^2(A_i\times A_j)^2+{1\over 2} g^2(A_i\times A_4)^2+{1\over 8}g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)\Phi_0^{\dagger} \Phi_0+V(\Phi_0)\bigr ]$$ (i=1,2,3). The part quadratic in non-static components will not be displayed explicitly, since its expression is lengthy and enlightening. only point us is, that the fluctuations are characterised by a $16\times 16$ matrix, because the 12 gauge components and 4 real Higgs scalar components are coupled in the most constant background. The gauge fixing imposed the fluctuations \xi_{\alpha} are & F^1 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over \\ & F^2 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^2-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_1,\nonumber \\ & F^3 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^3+\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_4,\end{aligned}$$ ($D_{\mu}(A)$ is the covariant derivative in the field $A$, the gauge parameter). corresponding determinant is $$\det +g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)+{\alpha \over 4}g^2\Phi_0^2 ]\delta^{a,b}- 2ig\epsilon^{abc}K_mA_m^c-g^2A_m^aA_m^b)\},$$ where Since the distinguishing difference of the proposed method to the Fe
 in the isospace). Upon substituTing the decOmposItiOn (4) iNtO (1) one SepaRates terms contAIninG the non-static fields up tO secoNd POwer, FOr The 1-loOp integRAtION. ThE pIeCe dEpENdIng onLy oN the conStant backgRouNd Takes the form: $$u^{(0)}=\BeTa V\bigl [{1\oveR 4}g^2(A_I\times A_j)^2+{1\over 2}
G^2(A_i\Times A_4)^2+{1\OvEr 8}g^2(a_I^2+A_4^2)\Phi_0^{\DagGer}
\PhI_0+V(\Phi_0)\bIGr ]$$ (i=1,2,3). The Part quadrAtIC in the NOn-statiC COmPoneNts will not be displAYeD Explicitly, sincE its exPrESsION is LenGthy and not EnLightENing. The ONlY IMPorTAnt point for us Is, that the flUCtuAtions ArE chARacterIsed bY a $16\TImeS 16$ matrix, becaUse tHe 12 gauge fiEld comPOnents aND 4 real HiGgs scaLar ComPoneNTs ArE fuLlY CouPLeD in THe mOst generAl CoNstanT bacKGROUnd.

THe gAuge FixinG conditions imPosEd on THe fLuctuAtionS $a_{m},
\xI_{\aLpha} $ aRe $$\begiN{aligNeD}
&
F^1 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\phi_0\oVer 2}\xi_2,\nonuMbeR \\ &
F^2 =(d_{\mu}(a)a_{\Mu})^2-\alpHA{g\Phi_0\oVer 2}\Xi_1,\nOnumber \\ &
f^3 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mU})^3+\AlpHa{G\pHI_0\oVer 2}\xi_4,\end{aligned}$$ ($D_{\mu}(a)$ iS THe CovarianT derivATiVe IN the backGrOunD fieLD $a$, $\alphA$ is tHE gAuge fixiNg paraMEtEr). the corrEsPondinG FAddEev-popov DEterMinant Is $$\det \{ [K^2 +g^2(A_I^2+A_4^2)+{\alpHA \over 4}g^2\Phi_0^2 ]\delta^{A,B}-
2ig\epsilon^{abc}k_MA_M^C-G^2A_M^AA_m^b)\},$$ WheRe $K^2 ={\bf k}^2+\omega_N^2$.

SinCE the DistINgUisHIng diFfereNcE Of THe proposed method relAtIve to tHe conVentional Fe
 in the isospace). Upon su bstituting  thedec omp os itio n (4 ) into (1) one sepa rates terms containing  theno n -sta t ic  fiel ds up t o  s e c ond  p ow er,  f o rthe 1 -lo op inte gration. T hepi ece dependin g  o nly on the  co nstant backg rou nd tak es  th e  form : $ $U^{( 0)}=\b e ta V\b igl [{1\o ve r  4}g^2 ( A_i\tim e s  A _j)^ 2+{1\over 2}
g^2( A _i \ times A_4)^2+{ 1\over  8 } g^ 2 ( A_i ^2+ A_4^2)\Phi _0 ^{\da g ger}
\P h i_ 0 + V (\P h i_0)\bigr ]$$  (i=1,2,3). The  partqu adr a tic in  theno n -st atic compon ents  will not  be di s playede xplicit ly, si nce  it s ex p re ss ion  i s  le n gt hya ndnot enli gh te ning.  The o n l y im por tant  poin t for us is,tha t th e  fl uctua tions  are  c harac terise d bya$16\times 16$ m atri x, becaus e t he  12  g augef ield c omp one nts and  4 real Hig gs s c al ar components arefu l l ycoupledin the mo st generalco nst antb a ckgro und. 
T he gauge  fixin g  c on ditions  i mposed  o n t hefluct u atio ns $a_ {m},
\xi _{\al p ha} $ are $$\b e gin{aligned}& 
F ^ 1  = ( D_{\ mu} (A)a_{\mu}) ^{1} - \alp ha{g \ Ph i_0 \ over2}\xi _2 , \n o number \\ &
F^2 =(D _{ \mu}(A )a_{\ mu})^2-\alpha {g\Phi_0\o v e r  2}\xi_1 ,\no n um b er \\ &
F^3 =( D_{\m u}(A)a_{\m u })^3+\al pha{g \Phi_0\o ver 2}\xi _ 4 ,\end{al ign ed} $$($D _ { \m u}(A)$ is the c ovar ia nt deri vat ive inthe  ba ckg rou nd  field $A $, $\alp ha $is  t hegauge fixing p ar ame te r).  Thec orresp ondin g Fa dd ee v -Po pov det e rm i n antis  $ $\de t \ {[K^2+g^2 ( A_i ^2+A_4^ 2)+{\alph a \ o ver4} g^ 2\Phi_0 ^2 ]\delta^{a ,b }-
2ig\eps il on^ {abc}K _ m A_m^c-g^ 2A_m^aA_m^b)\},$$ where $K^2 ={ \bf  k}^2 +\om ega_n^2$. 

S ince t hed isting uishin g dif fe ren c e  of t h e  p rop os ed methodr e lat ive t otheconvent ional Fe
 in_the isospace)._Upon substituting the decomposition_(4) into_(1)_one separates_terms_containing the non-static_fields up to_second power, for the_1-loop integration. The_piece_depending only on the constant background takes the form: $$U^{(0)}=\beta V\bigl [{1\over 4}g^2(A_i\times A_j)^2+{1\over_2}
g^2(A_i\times_A_4)^2+{1\over 8}g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)\Phi_0^{\dagger}
\Phi_0+V(\Phi_0)\bigr_]$$_(i=1,2,3)._The part quadratic in the_non-static components will not be_displayed explicitly,_since its expression is lengthy and not enlightening._The_only important point_for us is, that the fluctuations are characterised by_a $16\times 16$ matrix, because the_12 gauge field_components_and_4 real Higgs scalar_components are fully coupled in the_most general constant background.

The gauge fixing_conditions imposed on the fluctuations $a_{m},
\xi_{\alpha} $_are $$\begin{aligned}
&
F^1 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^{1}-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_2,\nonumber \\ &
F^2_=(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^2-\alpha{g\Phi_0\over 2}\xi_1,\nonumber \\ &
F^3 =(D_{\mu}(A)a_{\mu})^3+\alpha{g\Phi_0\over_2}\xi_4,\end{aligned}$$ ($D_{\mu}(A)$_is the covariant derivative in_the background field_$A$, $\alpha$_is the gauge_fixing parameter). The corresponding Faddeev-Popov determinant_is $$\det \{_[K^2 +g^2(A_i^2+A_4^2)+{\alpha \over 4}g^2\Phi_0^2 ]\delta^{a,b}-
2ig\epsilon^{abc}K_mA_m^c-g^2A_m^aA_m^b)\},$$ where_$K^2_={\bf k}^2+\omega_n^2$.

Since the_distinguishing_difference_of the_proposed method relative_to_the conventional_Fe