 and $m'$ are integers satisfying $mp=\chi^\lambda(1)$ and $m'p+(-1)^l = \chi^\lambda(1)$ in the respective cases.

Since $P$ is a cyclic group generated by a cycle of length $p$, the statement follows from the Murnaghan–Nakayama Rule [@JK 2.4.7].

The LittlewoodRichardson Rule {#sec: LR prelims}
-----------------------------

Let $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$ with $m<n$. For $\mu\vdash m$ and $\nu\vdash n-m$, the LittlewoodRichardson rule (see [@J Chapter 16]) describes the decomposition into irreducible constituents of induced character $$(\chi^\mu\times\chi^\nu){\big\uparrow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\mathfrak{S}}_m\times {\mathfrak{S}}_{n-m}}.$$

Before we recall the LittlewoodRichardson rule, we introduce some notation and technical definitions. By a skew shape $\gamma$ we mean a set difference of Young diagrams $[\lambda\setminus\mu]:=[\lambda]\setminus[\mu]$ for some partitions $\lambda$ and $\mu$ with $[\mu]\subsetneq[\lambda]$, and $|\gamma|:=|\lambda|-|\mu|$. By convention, the highest row of $[\lambda]$ for a partition $\lambda$ is numbered 1, but the highest row of a skew shape $\gamma=[\lambda\setminus\mu]$ need not be the highest row of $[\lambda]$.

\[def: LR type\] Let $\lambda=(\lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_k)\in\mathcal{P}(n)$ and let $\mathcal{C}=(c_1,\dotsc,c_n)$ be a sequence of positive integers. We say that $\mathcal{C}$ is of *weight $\lambda$* if $$|\{i\in\{1,\dotsc,n\}\ :\ c_i=j\}| = \lambda_j\, \ \text{for all}\ \ j\in\{1,\dotsc,k\}.$$

We say that an element $c_j$ of $\mathcal{C}$ is *good* if $c_j=1$ or if $$|\{i\in\{1,2,\dotsc,j-1\}\ :\ c_i=c_j-1\}|>|\{
and $ m'$ are integers satisfying $ mp=\chi^\lambda(1)$ and $ m'p+(-1)^l = \chi^\lambda(1)$ in the respective cases. 

 Since $ P$ is a cyclic group generated by a hertz of duration $ p$, the statement follows from the Murnaghan – Nakayama Rule [ @JK 2.4.7 ]. 

 The LittlewoodRichardson Rule { # sec: LR prelims } 
 ----------------------------- 

 get $ m, n\in\mathbb{N}$ with $ m < n$. For $ \mu\vdash m$ and $ \nu\vdash n - m$, the LittlewoodRichardson rule (experience [ @J Chapter 16 ]) identify the decomposition into irreducible component of induced character $ $ (\chi^\mu\times\chi^\nu){\big\uparrow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\mathfrak{S}}_m\times { \mathfrak{S}}_{n - m}}.$$ 

 Before we echo the LittlewoodRichardson rule, we introduce some note and technical definitions. By a skew shape $ \gamma$ we think of a set difference of new diagrams $ [ \lambda\setminus\mu]:=[\lambda]\setminus[\mu]$ for some partitions $ \lambda$ and $ \mu$ with $ [ \mu]\subsetneq[\lambda]$, and $ |\gamma|:=|\lambda|-|\mu|$. By convention, the high row of $ [ \lambda]$ for a partition $ \lambda$ is numbered 1, but the highest quarrel of a skew shape $ \gamma=[\lambda\setminus\mu]$ need not be the highest row of $ [ \lambda]$. 

 \[def: LR type\ ] Let $ \lambda=(\lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_k)\in\mathcal{P}(n)$ and let $ \mathcal{C}=(c_1,\dotsc, c_n)$ be a succession of positive integers. We say that $ \mathcal{C}$ is of * weight $ \lambda$ * if $ $ |\{i\in\{1,\dotsc, n\}\: \ c_i = j\}| = \lambda_j\, \ \text{for all}\ \ j\in\{1,\dotsc, k\}.$$ 

 We say that an element $ c_j$ of $ \mathcal{C}$ is * effective * if $ c_j=1 $ or if $ $ |\{i\in\{1,2,\dotsc, j-1\}\: \ c_i = c_j-1\}|>|\ {
 anf $m'$ are integers satisfylng $mp=\chi^\lambda(1)$ cbd $m'p+(-1)^l = \chi^\lzmbda(1)$ in the respective cases.

Since $P$ iw a ctclic group generated cy a cyclv of lengrh $p$, rhe statemxht follows frkl thz Nurnaghan–Nakaysma Rule [@JN 2.4.7].

The LittlewomdFiehardson Rule {#sec: LR prelims}
-----------------------------

Let $m,n\in\iathbb{N}$ wlth $m<n$. For $\mu\vqash i$ ans $\nu\vdash n-m$, the LittlewoodRichardaon rult (see [@J Chapter 16]) drscribes the decomposition intl irreducible conshituents of indtxed charactef $$(\chi^\mu\timts\ehi^\nu){\big\upatrow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\mathfrak{S}}_m\times {\maghfral{S}}_{n-m}}.$$

Before ww rfwall the LivtlewojdRichardson rule, we introdice some notatlon aid twchnical definitions. Uy a skew shape $\gammw$ we mean a set difference od Toung diacramr $[\laobdz\sxtmjnus\mu]:=[\pamuda]\setminus[\ju]$ for some partitions $\lambda$ snq $\mu$ with $[\mu]\sugsetnez[\lwmbda]$, and $|\gamma|:=|\lambda|-|\mu|$. By convention, tve gighest row of $[\lambda]$ fir a partition $\lambda$ is numbewed 1, but the highest row of a skew shape $\gamma=[\lamtda\sevmknuw\mm]$ nede jot be the highest row of $[\lambda]$.

\[def: LR type\] Lqf $\kakbda=(\lambda_1,\dotsg,\lambda_k)\in\mathcal{P}(m)$ wnc let $\mathcal{C}=(z_1,\dotsc,e_h)$ ge a sequence of plsitive inteters. We swy tnat $\mathcal{C}$ is of *weight $\lqmbda$* if $$|\{i\in\{1,\botwc,n\}\ :\ c_i=j\}| = \lambda_j\, \ \text{for alu}\ \ j\on\{1,\dotxc,k\}.$$

We say that an elemeut $c_j$ kf $\mathcal{C}$ is *good* jw $c_j=1$ or if $$|\{i\in\{1,2,\dogsc,m-1\}\ :\ w_i=c_j-1\}|>|\{
and $m'$ are integers satisfying $mp=\chi^\lambda(1)$ and \chi^\lambda(1)$ the respective Since $P$ is a of length $p$, statement follows from Murnaghan–Nakayama Rule [@JK 2.4.7]. The LittlewoodRichardson {#sec: LR prelims} ----------------------------- Let $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$ with $m<n$. For $\mu\vdash m$ and $\nu\vdash the LittlewoodRichardson rule (see [@J Chapter 16]) describes the decomposition into irreducible constituents induced $$(\chi^\mu\times\chi^\nu){\big\uparrow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\mathfrak{S}}_m\times Before recall the LittlewoodRichardson rule, we introduce some notation and technical definitions. By a skew shape $\gamma$ mean a set difference of Young diagrams $[\lambda\setminus\mu]:=[\lambda]\setminus[\mu]$ some partitions $\lambda$ and with $[\mu]\subsetneq[\lambda]$, and $|\gamma|:=|\lambda|-|\mu|$. By the row of for partition is numbered 1, the highest row of a skew shape $\gamma=[\lambda\setminus\mu]$ need not be the highest row of $[\lambda]$. \[def: type\] Let let $\mathcal{C}=(c_1,\dotsc,c_n)$ a of integers. We say is of *weight $\lambda$* if $$|\{i\in\{1,\dotsc,n\}\ \lambda_j\, \ \text{for all}\ \ j\in\{1,\dotsc,k\}.$$ We say an element of $\mathcal{C}$ is *good* if $c_j=1$ if $$|\{i\in\{1,2,\dotsc,j-1\}\ :\ c_i=c_j-1\}|>|\{
 and $m'$ are integers satisfying $Mp=\chi^\lambdA(1)$ and $m'P+(-1)^l = \cHi^\lAmBda(1)$ iN the Respective caseS.

sincE $P$ is a cyclic group generaTed by A cYCle oF LeNgth $p$, The statEMeNT FolLoWs FroM tHE MUrnagHan–nakayamA Rule [@JK 2.4.7].

The litTlEwoodRichardSOn rule {#sec: LR pRelIms}
-----------------------------

Let $m,n\in\maThbB{N}$ with $M<n$. for $\MU\vdasH m$ aNd $\nu\vDash n-m$, THe LittLewoodRicHaRDson ruLE (see [@J ChAPTeR 16]) desCribes the decomposITiON into irreducibLe consTiTUeNTS of IndUced characTeR $$(\chi^\mU\Times\chI^\Nu){\BIG\UpaRRow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\Mathfrak{S}}_m\tIMes {\MathfrAk{s}}_{n-m}}.$$

bEfore wE recaLl THe LIttlewoodRiCharDson rule, wE introDUce some NOtation And tecHniCal DefiNItIoNs. BY a SKew SHaPe $\gAMma$ We mean a sEt DiFfereNce oF yOUNg diAgrAms $[\lAmbda\Setminus\mu]:=[\lamBda]\SetmINus[\Mu]$ for Some pArtiTiOns $\laMbda$ anD $\mu$ wiTh $[\Mu]\subsetneq[\lambDa]$, anD $|\gamma|:=|\lamBda|-|\Mu|$. by cOnVentiON, the hiGheSt rOw of $[\lamBda]$ for a PArtItION $\LaMbda$ is numbered 1, but tHe HIGhEst row of A skew sHApE $\gAMma=[\lambdA\sEtmInus\MU]$ Need nOt be THe Highest rOw of $[\laMBdA]$.

\[dEf: LR typE\] LEt $\lambDa=(\LamBda_1,\Dotsc,\LAmbdA_k)\in\maThcal{P}(n)$ aNd let $\MAthcal{C}=(c_1,\dotsc,c_N)$ Be a sequence of POsITIvE InteGerS. We say that $\mAthcAL{C}$ is Of *weIGhT $\laMBda$* if $$|\{I\in\{1,\doTsC,N\}\ :\ c_I=J\}| = \lambda_j\, \ \text{for all}\ \ j\In\{1,\Dotsc,k\}.$$

we say That an element $C_j$ of $\mathcaL{c}$ IS *good* if $c_J=1$ or iF $$|\{I\iN\{1,2,\Dotsc,j-1\}\ :\ c_i=c_j-1\}|>|\{
 and $m'$ are integers sat isfying $m p=\ch i^\ lam bd a(1) $ an d $m'p+(-1)^l=  \ch i^\lambda(1)$ in the r espec ti v e ca s es .

Si nce $P$ is a  cy cl ic  gr ou p  g enera ted  by a c ycle of le ngt h$p$, the sta t em ent follow s f rom the Murn agh an–Nak ay ama Rule[@J K 2.4 .7].
T he Lit tlewoodRi ch a rdsonR ule {#s e c :LR p relims}
--------- - -- - -------------- --

Le t$ m, n \ in\ mat hbb{N}$ wi th  $m<n $ . For $ \ mu \ v d ash m$ and $\nu\v dash n-m$,t heLittle wo odR i chards on ru le (se e [@J Chapt er 1 6]) descr ibes t h e decom p osition  intoirr edu cibl e  c on sti tu e nts of  in d uce d charac te r$$(\c hi^\ m u \ t imes \ch i^\n u){\b ig\uparrow}^{ {\m athf r ak{ S}}_n }_{{\ math fr ak{S} }_m\ti mes { \m athfrak{S}}_{n- m}}. $$

Befor e w erec al l the Little woo dRi chardso n rule, wein t r o du ce some notation a nd t ec hnical d efinit i on s. By a ske wsha pe $ \ g amma$  wem ea n a setdiffer e nc eof Youn gdiagra ms  $[ \la mbda\ s etmi nus\mu ]:=[\lam bda]\ s etminus[\mu]$f or some parti t io n s  $ \ lamb da$  and $\mu$with $[\m u]\s u bs etn e q[\la mbda] $, an d  $|\gamma|:=|\lambd a| -|\mu| $. By  convention,the highes t r ow of $[ \lam b da ] $ for a partit ion $ \lambda$ i s  numbere d 1,but thehighest r o w  of a sk ewsha pe$\g a m ma =[\lambda\set m i nus\ mu ]$ need  no t be th e h igh est  ro wof $[\lam bda]$.
\[ de f:  L R t ype\] Let $\la mb da= (\ lam bda_1 , \dotsc ,\lam bda_ k) \i n \ma thcal{P } (n ) $  and  l et  $\m ath ca l{C}= (c_1 , \do tsc,c_n )$ be a s equ e nceof  p ositive  integers. We  s ay that $\ ma thc al{C}$ i s of *we ight $\lambda$* if $$|\ { i\in\{1 ,\d otsc, n\}\  :\ c_i=j \}|  = \la mbd a _j\, \  \text {foral l}\ \  j\in \ { 1, \do ts c,k\}.$$
W e  sa y tha tan e lement$c_j$ of $\mathcal { C}$  is *good* if  $c _j=1 $ or  if $$ | \{i \i n \{1 , 2 ,\dotsc,j-1\}\:\ c_i=c_j -1 \ }| >|\{
 and_$m'$ are_integers satisfying $mp=\chi^\lambda(1)$ and_$m'p+(-1)^l =_\chi^\lambda(1)$_in the_respective_cases.

Since $P$ is_a cyclic group_generated by a cycle_of length $p$,_the_statement follows from the Murnaghan–Nakayama Rule [@JK 2.4.7].

The LittlewoodRichardson Rule {#sec: LR prelims}
-----------------------------

Let $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$_with_$m<n$. For_$\mu\vdash_m$_and $\nu\vdash n-m$, the LittlewoodRichardson_rule (see [@J Chapter 16])_describes the_decomposition into irreducible constituents of induced character $$(\chi^\mu\times\chi^\nu){\big\uparrow}^{{\mathfrak{S}}_n}_{{\mathfrak{S}}_m\times_{\mathfrak{S}}_{n-m}}.$$

Before_we recall the_LittlewoodRichardson rule, we introduce some notation and technical definitions._By a skew shape $\gamma$ we_mean a set_difference_of_Young diagrams $[\lambda\setminus\mu]:=[\lambda]\setminus[\mu]$ for_some partitions $\lambda$ and $\mu$ with_$[\mu]\subsetneq[\lambda]$, and $|\gamma|:=|\lambda|-|\mu|$. By convention, the_highest row of $[\lambda]$ for a partition_$\lambda$ is numbered 1, but the_highest row of a skew_shape $\gamma=[\lambda\setminus\mu]$_need not be the highest_row of $[\lambda]$.

\[def:_LR type\]_Let $\lambda=(\lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_k)\in\mathcal{P}(n)$ and_let $\mathcal{C}=(c_1,\dotsc,c_n)$ be a sequence of_positive integers. We_say that $\mathcal{C}$ is of *weight_$\lambda$*_if $$|\{i\in\{1,\dotsc,n\}\ :\_c_i=j\}|_=_\lambda_j\, \_\text{for all}\ \_j\in\{1,\dotsc,k\}.$$

We_say that_an_element $c_j$ of $\mathcal{C}$ is *good*_if_$c_j=1$ or if $$|\{i\in\{1,2,\dotsc,j-1\}\ :\ c_i=c_j-1\}|>|\{