rm y} > 0$), then with the same mean density $n_0$ and the same background ionizing spectrum we obtain a higher value of $U_0$ without any additional sources of the ionization. Intermittent regions of low and high ionization caused by the density fluctuations will occur in this case along the sightline. On the other hand, for a given $U_0$ the mean gas density $n_0$ is also higher in the fluctuating media as compared to the completely homogeneous gas clouds ($\sigma_{\rm y}$ = 0). Since the linear size of the absorber is $L = N_{\rm H}/n_0$, the sizes estimated with the assumption of a constant density (as, e.g., in the VPF) may occur too large.

Another important question is whether the MCI solution is unique and accurate. In general, the inverse problems are highly non-linear and ill-posed which implies multiple solutions and/or very broad uncertainty ranges for the recovered parameters. To produce a physically reasonable solution, one has to account for all available information related to the case under study. For instance, the more lines of different ionic transitions are included into the analysis, the more accurate result can be obtained since both low- and high-density regions are probed simultaneously. One may also compare the relative metal abundances predicted by nucleosynthetic theories with those provided by the MCI. An odd pattern may indicate a misleading solution. The recovered linear sizes must also be in agreement with the characteristic sizes of the absorbers stemming from observations of gravitationally lensed quasars and quasar pairs which show $L \la 100$ kpc.

One of the main problem in the analysis of the QSO high redshift spectra is the line blending which hampers significantly the inversion of the observed spectra. As compared to the VPF method, the MCI is much more robust dealing with blended lines due to the assumption that all ions trace the same underlying gas density and velocity distributions. This means that we are able to reconstruct both distributions using unblended parts of different lines. It is obvious that the accuracy of the recovered parameters improves with increasing number of lines and the variety of ions involved in the analysis. A priori we do not know which parts of the lines are blended and which are not. To clarify this, several test runs with different arrangements of lines are carried out till a self-consistent fit for the majority of lines observed in the spectrum is found.

Results on individual metal
rm y } > 0 $), then with the same mean density $ n_0 $ and the same setting ionize spectrum we obtain a higher value of $ U_0 $ without any additional source of the ionization. Intermittent regions of low and gamey ionization induce by the density fluctuation will occur in this case along the sightline. On the early hand, for a given $ U_0 $ the mean gas concentration $ n_0 $ is also higher in the fluctuate media as compared to the wholly homogeneous gas clouds ($ \sigma_{\rm y}$ = 0). Since the linear size of the absorber is $ L = N_{\rm H}/n_0 $, the size estimated with the assumption of a changeless density (as, for example, in the VPF) may occur besides large. 

 Another important question is whether the MCI solution is alone and accurate. In general, the inverse problems are highly non - linear and ill - posed which implies multiple solutions and/or very broad uncertainty ranges for the recovered parameters. To produce a physically reasonable solution, one has to account for all available information related to the event under study. For instance, the more agate line of unlike ionic transition are included into the analysis, the more accurate result can be obtained since both low- and high - density regions are probe simultaneously. One may also compare the relative metal abundances predicted by nucleosynthetic theories with those provide by the MCI. An odd pattern may indicate a misleading solution. The recuperate analogue size must also be in agreement with the characteristic sizes of the absorbers stemming from observations of gravitationally lensed quasars and quasar pairs which picture $ L \la 100 $ kpc. 

 One of the main problem in the analysis of the QSO high red shift spectra is the line blending which hampers significantly the inversion of the ascertained spectra. As compared to the VPF method, the MCI is much more full-bodied dealing with blended line due to the assumption that all ions decipher the same underlie gas density and velocity distributions. This means that we are able to reconstruct both distributions using unblended parts of unlike lines. It is obvious that the accuracy of the recovered parameter improves with increasing number of lines and the variety of ions involved in the psychoanalysis. A priori we do not know which parts of the lines are blended and which are not. To clarify this, several test runs with different arrangement of line are carried out till a self - consistent fit for the majority of lines observed in the spectrum is found. 

 consequence on individual metal
rm j} > 0$), then with the same mtan density $n_0$ and the sake baciground konizing spectrum we obtain e hither calue of $U_0$ without any additionwl sourcws oh the ionization. Intermibcent dcgionv of low and hinh ionizatimn caused by tve dznsity fluctuations will occur in thys case apong the sightjine. Jn tgv ither hand, for a given $U_0$ the jean gav density $n_0$ ix also higher in the fluctkatijg media as comparfd to the cimplqrely homogendous gas clouds ($\sigma_{\rj y}$ = 0). Since the linear size of ghe aysorber is $O = N_{\rl H}/n_0$, the sizxs estpmated with tmv assum[tion og a constant dcnsitb (as, e.g., in the VPF) may ocrur too large.

Another importand suestion is whethwr the KCI voluguon is uiiqhe and acrurate. In gsneral, the unverse problems art hythly non-linead and ylj-posed which implies multiple solutions ans/or very broad uncertaibty ranges for the refovered pwrameters. To produce a physically reasonable soludion, kve kqs to qcfount for all available information related tj tne case under stmdy. For instance, tne mpte lines of diwferenc iknic transitions age incloded ibto the agalyxis, the more accurate resulr can be obtcinwd since both low- cnd high-densnty rebions are probed simultaneourly. Kne may alsl compare ghe relative metxl sbgndances predicted by nuclqosynthetmc thzories wkth jhose pwovided by the MCI. An odd pattern lay iudicade a mislewding solution. The recovered liixar sizes musj anso be in ayreemekt with the chawacteristic siees of thz absofbers stemjing frmm observatyons of gravidwtionally leised quaswrs qnd wuasar oxirs which shoe $L \la 100$ kic.

Jne if the main problek iv the analysis oy uhw QSO high redxhiwt fpvctca is dhe line bletdine wfoch hxmpers signlfizantky the inversion of dhe kbserved spectra. Ax gompared jo the VPS method, the KCI is much more rlbust deeling eitr blended lines due to the asshmption tjat all ions trwce bhe fame underkying gas density and velocity distribuvions. This means that ww are able to reconxuruct both dixtribttions ushng unblended parts if different linex. It is obvious that fhe acwuracj of the recovered parameters improves with increasing number of lines ane the tawiety of iohs imvolvvd nn che anajysid. A priori we do mot know which parts of the linxs are bletdzd and which are not. To clarigy this, several test runs with differenf arrangrments of lines are carried out till a self-consistent flt for thw majkrity of lmnes observed in the spectxum is found.

Rwsulbs on individuxl kebal
rm y} > 0$), then with the density and the background ionizing spectrum of without any additional of the ionization. regions of low and high ionization by the density fluctuations will occur in this case along the sightline. On other hand, for a given $U_0$ the mean gas density $n_0$ is also in fluctuating as to the completely homogeneous gas clouds ($\sigma_{\rm y}$ = 0). Since the linear size of the is $L = N_{\rm H}/n_0$, the sizes estimated the assumption of a density (as, e.g., in the may too large. important is the MCI solution unique and accurate. In general, the inverse problems are highly non-linear and ill-posed which implies multiple solutions very broad for the parameters. produce physically reasonable solution, to account for all available information case under study. For instance, the more lines different ionic are included into the analysis, the accurate result can be obtained since both low- high-density regions are probed simultaneously. One may also compare the relative metal abundances predicted by with those provided by MCI. An odd may a solution. recovered linear must also be in agreement with the characteristic sizes of the stemming from observations of gravitationally lensed quasars and quasar pairs $L 100$ kpc. One the main problem in analysis the QSO high redshift the blending the of observed spectra. As compared the VPF method, the MCI much more robust dealing the assumption that all ions trace the same gas density and velocity distributions. This means we are able to reconstruct both distributions using unblended parts of different It is the accuracy of the recovered parameters improves with number of lines and variety of ions involved in the analysis. A priori do know which of the lines blended and which not. To clarify test runs different of out till a self-consistent fit for majority lines observed in the spectrum found. individual metal
rm y} > 0$), then with the same mean denSity $n_0$ and thE same BacKgrOuNd ioNiziNg spectrum we obTAin a Higher value of $U_0$ without aNy addItIOnal SOuRces oF the ionIZaTIOn. INtErMitTeNT rEgionS of Low and hIgh ionizatIon CaUsed by the denSItY fluctuatiOns Will occur in tHis Case alOnG thE SightLinE. On thE other HAnd, for A given $U_0$ thE mEAn gas dENsity $n_0$ iS ALsO higHer in the fluctuatiNG mEDia as compared tO the coMpLEtELY hoMogEneous gas cLoUds ($\siGMa_{\rm y}$ = 0). SiNCe THE LinEAr size of the abSorber is $L = N_{\rM h}/n_0$, tHe sizeS eStiMAted wiTh the AsSUmpTion of a consTant Density (as, E.g., in thE vPF) may oCCur too lArge.

AnOthEr iMporTAnT qUesTiON is WHeTheR The mCI solutIoN iS uniqUe anD ACCUratE. In GeneRal, thE inverse problEms Are hIGhlY non-lInear And iLl-Posed Which iMplieS mUltiple solutionS and/Or very broAd uNcErtAiNty raNGes for The RecOvered pArameteRS. To PrODUCe A physically reasonaBlE SOlUtion, one Has to aCCoUnT For all avAiLabLe inFORmatiOn reLAtEd to the cAse undER sTuDy. For inStAnce, thE mOre LinEs of dIFferEnt ionIc transiTions ARe included into THe analysis, the MOrE ACcURate ResUlt can be obtAineD SincE botH LoW- anD High-dEnsitY rEGiONs are probed simultanEoUsly. OnE may aLso compare the Relative meTAL AbundancEs prEDiCTed by nucleosynThetiC theories wITh those pRovidEd by the McI. An odd paTTErn may inDicAte A miSleADInG solution. The rECOverEd Linear sIzeS must alSo bE in AgrEemEnT with the cHaracterIsTiC sIzEs oF the aBSorbers sTeMmiNg FroM obseRVationS of grAvitAtIoNAllY lensed QUaSARs anD qUaSar pAirS wHich sHow $L \LA 100$ kpC.

One of tHe main proBleM In thE aNaLysis of The QSO high redShIft spectra Is The Line blENDing whicH hampers significantly thE InversiOn oF the oBserVed spectrA. As ComparEd tO The VPF Method, The MCi iS muCH More rOBUsT deAlIng with bleNDEd lInes dUe To thE assumpTion that all ions traCE thE same underlyiNg gAs deNSItY anD VeLOciTy DIstRIButions. This meanS that we are AbLE tO reconstruCT boTh DistribUtions uSing uNBlended Parts of diFferent liNeS. It iS OBviOus that the Accuracy Of the recoVEred pARaMeterS imProves WiTh iNcreaSing nuMBer Of linEs and tHe VarietY of ioNs Involved In the analysis. A priori we dO not knOw whiCh pArts of the LinES arE blended aNd whIch are not. TO clAriFy thiS, seVEral tEst rUNs WitH DiffeRent ARrangemenTS oF liNES aRe carried ouT TILl a Self-cOnsIStent fIt foR the majority of linES observed in the SpecTRUm iS foUNd.

ReSuLts on individuaL meTaL
rm y} > 0$), then with the  same mean  dens ity  $n _0 $ an d th e same backgro u nd i onizing spectrum we ob tainah ighe r  v alueof $U_0 $  w i t hou tan y a dd i ti onalsou rces of  the ioniz ati on . Intermitte n tregions of  lo w and high i oni zation  c aus e d bythe  dens ity fl u ctuati ons willoc c ur int his cas e al ongthe sightline. On th e  other hand, f or a g iv e n$ U _0$  th e mean gas  d ensit y  $n_0$i sa l s o h i gher in the f luctuatingm edi a as c om par e d to t he co mp l ete ly homogene ousgas cloud s ($\s i gma_{\r m  y}$ =0). Si nce  th e li n ea rsiz eo f t h eabs o rbe r is $L=N_ {\rmH}/n _ 0 $ ,  the  si zesestim ated with the  as sump t ion  of a  cons tant  d ensit y (as,  e.g. ,in the VPF) may  occ ur too la rge .
An ot her i m portan t q ues tion is  whethe r  th eM C I  s olution is uniquean d ac curate.In gen e ra l, the inve rs e p robl e m s are  hig h ly  non-lin ear an d  i ll -posedwh ich im pl ies  mu ltipl e  sol utions  and/orveryb road uncertain t y ranges fort he r ec o vere d p arameters.To p r oduc e ap hy sic a lly r eason ab l es olution, one has to  a ccount  forall available  informati o n relatedto t h ec ase under stud y. Fo r instance ,  the mor e lin es of di fferent i o n ic trans iti ons  ar e i n c lu ded into thea n alys is , the m ore  accura teres ult  ca nbe obtain ed since  b ot hlo w-and h i gh-densi ty  re gi ons  arep robedsimul tane ou sl y . O ne maya ls o comp ar etherel at ive m etal abu ndances  predicte d b y  nuc le os yntheti c theories wi th  those pro vi ded  by th e MCI. Anodd pattern may indicat e  a misl ead ing s olut ion. Therec overed  li n ear si zes mu st al so  be i n agr e e me ntwi th the cha r a cte risti csize s of th e absorbers stemmi n g f rom observati ons  ofg r av ita t io n all yl ens e d  quasars and qu asar pairs  w h ic h show $L\ la10 0$ kpc. 

One o f the main pr oblem inthe analy si s of t heQSO high r edshiftspectra i s  thel in e ble ndi ng whi ch  ha mpers  signi f ica ntlythe in ve rsionof th eobserved  spectra. As compared t o theVPF m eth od, the M CIi s m uch morerobu st dealing  wi thblend edl inesduet othe assum ptio n  that all io nst r ac e the sameu n d erl yinggas densit y an d velocity distri b utions. This m eans t hat  we areab le to reconstr uct  b o t h distri bu tions using  unblend ed parts  of di fferen t lines . It is obv ious  th at the ac cur ac y  of the  r ec o veredpara me ters i mprove s  wit h increasing numbe r ofl i nes a n d t he va ri ety ofi onsinvolved i n the analy sis. A  pri ori w e do no tknow w hic hparts of t h e lines a re bl ended a nd  whi chare no t. T o clari fy t hi s,several t e s tr un sw ith  dif feren tarra ngementso f linesare carried  o utt i ll a s e lf - c onsistentfit  fort h e majority of l i ne s  obse rved i n thespectru m  is  f ound.
Res u l ts on ind ividual m e tal 
rm y}_> 0$),_then with the same_mean density_$n_0$_and the_same_background ionizing spectrum_we obtain a_higher value of $U_0$_without any additional_sources_of the ionization. Intermittent regions of low and high ionization caused by the density_fluctuations_will occur_in_this_case along the sightline. On_the other hand, for a_given $U_0$_the mean gas density $n_0$ is also higher_in_the fluctuating media_as compared to the completely homogeneous gas clouds ($\sigma_{\rm_y}$ = 0). Since the linear_size of the_absorber_is_$L = N_{\rm H}/n_0$,_the sizes estimated with the assumption_of a constant density (as, e.g.,_in the VPF) may occur too large.

Another_important question is whether the MCI_solution is unique and accurate._In general,_the inverse problems are highly_non-linear and ill-posed_which implies_multiple solutions and/or_very broad uncertainty ranges for the_recovered parameters. To_produce a physically reasonable solution, one_has_to account for_all_available_information related_to the case_under_study. For_instance,_the more lines of different ionic_transitions_are included into the analysis, the more_accurate result can be_obtained_since both low- and_high-density regions are probed simultaneously._One may also compare the relative_metal abundances_predicted by_nucleosynthetic theories with those provided by the MCI. An odd pattern_may indicate a misleading solution. The_recovered linear sizes must_also be_in_agreement with the_characteristic_sizes of_the absorbers stemming from observations of gravitationally_lensed quasars_and quasar pairs which show $L_\la 100$ kpc.

One of_the_main problem in the analysis of_the QSO high redshift spectra is_the line blending which hampers_significantly_the_inversion of the observed spectra._As compared to the VPF method,_the MCI is_much more robust dealing with blended lines_due_to the assumption that all ions_trace_the same underlying gas density and_velocity_distributions._This means that we are_able to reconstruct both distributions using_unblended parts of different lines. It is obvious that_the accuracy of_the recovered parameters improves with_increasing_number_of lines and the variety of ions involved in the_analysis. A_priori we do_not know which parts of the lines are blended and_which are not. To clarify this, several_test runs with different arrangements of lines are carried out till_a self-consistent fit for the majority of lines_observed in the spectrum is found.

Results on_individual metal