) where clusters absorb less photons due to fast collisional ionization removing target ions [@Ackad_cluster_expansion_XUV].

The current work includes one and two photon ionization given by the rate, $$\frac{dN}{dt} = \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right) \sigma^{(1)} + \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigma^{(2)}$$ where $I$ is the intensity of the laser, $E_{ph}$ is the photon energy and $\sigma^{(n)}$ is the $n$-th order photoionization process. The values of $\sigma^{(1)}=5.0\times 10^{-18}$ cm$^2$ [@Argon_photo_neutral] and $\sigma^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ cm$^4$/s (taken as an upper limit from reference [@McKenna2004]) were used. The higher $\sigma^{(2)}$ is, the smaller the range of intensities in which effective saturation will occur, and thus taking an upper limit gives a conservative estimate of the saturation effect. To show the saturation effect in our AACM model, we solved the interaction of argon clusters (Ar$_{147}$) irradiated by two XUV pulses at $\lambda =33$ nm (37.6 eV) 25-fs apart. Both pulses have a full-width-at-half-maximum of 10 fs. Although short pulses increase the probability of multiphoton ionization (which undermines our signal), they also allow the probe pulse to irradiate the cluster while the density is still high (which enhances the likelihood of nanoplasma perturbations which must depend on the plasma density). The number density of the ions at the peak of the pump pulse is around $3.99\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ (where the distance of the furthest ion is used as the radius of the spherical volume) while at the peak of the probe pulse the density is $3.84\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$, a percent difference of about 3.85%. Further, the plasma number-density of the cluster at the same radius is $1.27\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at the peak of the pump and $1.58\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at the peak of the probe. Thus, the effects of an enhanced photoionization mechanism will be most pronounced during the probe pulse
) where clusters absorb less photons due to fast collisional ionization removing prey ion [ @Ackad_cluster_expansion_XUV ]. 

 The current work includes one and two photon ionization give by the pace, $ $ \frac{dN}{dt } = \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right) \sigma^{(1) } + \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigma^{(2)}$$ where $ I$ is the intensity of the laser, $ E_{ph}$ is the photon energy and $ \sigma^{(n)}$ is the $ n$-th order photoionization procedure. The values of $ \sigma^{(1)}=5.0\times 10^{-18}$ cm$^2 $ [ @Argon_photo_neutral ] and $ \sigma^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ cm$^4$/s (taken as an upper terminus ad quem from reference point   [ @McKenna2004 ]) were used. The high $ \sigma^{(2)}$ is, the smaller the range of intensity in which effective impregnation will occur, and thus bring an upper terminus ad quem give a conservative estimate of the saturation impression. To show the saturation consequence in our AACM model, we solve the interaction of argon clusters (Ar$_{147}$) irradiated by two XUV pulses at $ \lambda = 33 $ nm (37.6 eV) 25 - fs apart. Both pulse have a full - width - at - half - maximum of 10 fs. Although short pulses increase the probability of multiphoton ionization (which undermines our signal), they also allow the probe pulse to irradiate the cluster while the density is still high (which enhances the likelihood of nanoplasma disturbance which must depend on the plasma density). The issue concentration of the ion at the peak of the pump pulse is around $ 3.99\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ (where the distance of the furthest ion is used as the radius of the spherical bulk) while at the peak of the probe pulse the density is $ 3.84\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$, a percent difference of about 3.85% . far, the plasma number - density of the cluster at the same spoke is $ 1.27\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at the peak of the heart and $ 1.58\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at the peak of the probe. Thus, the effects of an enhanced photoionization mechanism will be most pronounced during the probe pulse
) whfre clusters absorb less photons due to fast cmllisiknal ionkzation removing target ions [@Axkad_couster_expansion_XUV].

The zurrent wlrk inclydes ine and two photon ionizzbion yiten by the rate, $$\frac{dN}{dt} = \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\rhgft) \sigma^{(1)} + \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigma^{(2)}$$ whewe $I$ is tje intensity os tht lwser, $V_{pm}$ is the photon energy and $\sigma^{(h)}$ is tht $n$-th order photoipnization process. The valufs ov $\sigma^{(1)}=5.0\times 10^{-18}$ cm$^2$ [@Aggon_photo_neofraj] and $\sigma^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ zm$^4$/s (taken as an upper mimit from reference [@McKenna2004]) werd useb. The highet $\aihka^{(2)}$ is, the snalleg the range on intenvities on which effecbive vatyration will occur, anv thus taking an uppgr limit ghvzs a conservative estumqte ox tha sagyragioh xffsct. To shkw the sathration effwct in our AACM modtl, rv solved the jnterastyon of argon clusters (Ar$_{147}$) irradiated by uwo XHV pulses at $\lambda =33$ nm (37.6 eV) 25-fs apart. Both pupses have a full-width-at-half-maximum of 10 fs. Although short pglses kncxcwrw hhe probability of multiphoton ionization (whisg incermines our slgnal), they also alkoa yre probe pulsg to irxzdjate the cluster wjile thg densuty is styll nigh (which enhances the likwlihood of ncnoplasma perturbatious which musc depemd on the plasma density). The numger density of the ikvs at the peak ow tme [ump pulse is around $3.99\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ (whece thz distanze og the surthest iln is used as the radius of tke spverical vopume) while at the peak of the pcpbe pulse thg danspty is $3.84\tiies10^{-3}$ bphr$^{-3}$, a percent difference of about 3.85%. Furtfer, the plzsma nukber-density of the clustat at the same radius ys $1.27\tumes10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ ag the peak of tne pump aub $1.58\times10^{-3}$ bihr$^{-3}$ at the peak of thg lrobe. Thus, the zyftcrs of an enhanved phjtlipnysation mechatism wiuk be oost pronoukcea duting the probe pulse
) where clusters absorb less photons due collisional removing target [@Ackad_cluster_expansion_XUV]. The current photon given by the $$\frac{dN}{dt} = \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right) + \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigma^{(2)}$$ where $I$ is intensity of the laser, $E_{ph}$ is the photon energy and $\sigma^{(n)}$ is the order photoionization process. The values of $\sigma^{(1)}=5.0\times 10^{-18}$ cm$^2$ [@Argon_photo_neutral] and $\sigma^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ (taken an limit reference [@McKenna2004]) were used. The higher $\sigma^{(2)}$ is, the smaller the range of intensities in which saturation will occur, and thus taking an upper gives a conservative estimate the saturation effect. To show saturation in our model, solved interaction of argon (Ar$_{147}$) irradiated by two XUV pulses at $\lambda =33$ nm (37.6 eV) 25-fs apart. Both pulses have full-width-at-half-maximum of Although short increase probability multiphoton ionization (which signal), they also allow the probe the cluster while the density is still high enhances the of nanoplasma perturbations which must depend the plasma density). The number density of the at the peak of the pump pulse is around $3.99\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ (where the distance of ion is used as radius of the volume) at peak the probe the density is $3.84\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$, a percent difference of about 3.85%. the plasma number-density of the cluster at the same radius bohr$^{-3}$ the peak of pump and $1.58\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ the of the probe. Thus, of enhanced be pronounced the probe pulse
) where clusters absorb less phOtons due to Fast cOllIsiOnAl ioNizaTion removing taRGet iOns [@Ackad_cluster_expansiOn_XUV].

thE CurrENt Work iNcludes ONe AND twO pHoTon IoNIzAtion GivEn by the Rate, $$\frac{dN}{Dt} = \lEfT(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\rigHT) \sIgma^{(1)} + \left(\frAc{I}{e_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigmA^{(2)}$$ whEre $I$ is ThE inTEnsitY of The laSer, $E_{ph}$ IS the phOton energY aND $\sigma^{(N)}$ Is the $n$-tH ORdEr phOtoionization procESs. tHe values of $\sigmA^{(1)}=5.0\times 10^{-18}$ Cm$^2$ [@aRgON_PhoTo_nEutral] and $\sIgMa^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ cm$^4$/s (TAken as aN UpPER LimIT from referencE [@McKenna2004]) werE UseD. The hiGhEr $\sIGma^{(2)}$ is, tHe smaLlER thE range of intEnsiTies in whiCh effeCTive satURation wIll occUr, aNd tHus tAKiNg An uPpER liMIt GivES a cOnservatIvE eStimaTe of THE SAturAtiOn efFect. TO show the saturAtiOn efFEct In our aACM mOdel, We SolveD the inTeracTiOn of argon clusteRs (Ar$_{147}$) IrradiateD by TwO XUv pUlses AT $\lambdA =33$ nm (37.6 EV) 25-fS apart. BOth pulsES haVe A FULl-Width-at-half-maximum Of 10 FS. alThough shOrt pulSEs InCRease the PrObaBiliTY Of mulTiphOToN ionizatIon (whiCH uNdErmines OuR signaL), tHey AlsO alloW The pRobe puLse to irrAdiatE The cluster whilE The density is sTIlL HIgH (WhicH enHances the liKeliHOod oF nanOPlAsmA PertuRbatiOnS WhICh must depend on the plAsMa densIty). ThE number densitY of the ions AT THe peak of The pUMp PUlse is around $3.99\tiMes10^{-3}$ boHr$^{-3}$ (where the DIstance oF the fUrthest iOn is used aS THe radius Of tHe sPheRicAL VoLume) while at thE PEak oF tHe probe PulSe the deNsiTy iS $3.84\tiMes10^{-3}$ BoHr$^{-3}$, a percenT differeNcE oF aBoUt 3.85%. FUrtheR, The plasmA nUmbEr-DenSity oF The cluSter aT the SaMe RAdiUs is $1.27\timES10^{-3}$ bOHR$^{-3}$ at tHe PeAk of The PuMp and $1.58\TimeS10^{-3}$ BohR$^{-3}$ at the pEak of the pRobE. thus, ThE eFfects oF an enhanced phOtOionizatioN mEchAnism wILL be most pRonounced during the probe PUlse
) where clusters absorb le ss photons  duetofas tcoll isio nal ionization remo ving target ions [@Ack ad_cl us t er_e x pa nsion _XUV].Th e cur re nt  wo rk in clude s o ne andtwo photon  io ni zation given by  the rate,  $$ \frac{dN}{dt } =  \left (\ fra c {I}{E _{p h}}\r ight)\ sigma^ {(1)} + \ le f t(\fra c {I}{E_{ p h }} \rig ht)^2 \sigma^{(2) } $$ where $I$ is t he int en s it y ofthe  laser, $E _{ ph}$i s the p h ot o n ene r gy and $\sigm a^{(n)}$ is the  $n$-t hord e r phot oioni za t ion  process. T he v alues of$\sigm a ^{(1)}= 5 .0\time s 10^{ -18 }$cm$^ 2 $[@ Arg on _ pho t o_ neu t ral ] and $\ si gm a^{(2 )}=1 0 ^ { -50} $ c m$^4 $/s ( taken as an u ppe r li m itfromrefer ence  [ @McKe nna200 4]) w er e used. The hig her$\sigma^{ (2) }$  is ,the s m allerthe  ra nge ofintensi t ies  i n w hi ch effective satur at i o nwill occ ur, an d  t hu s  takingan  up perl i mit g ives aconserva tive e s ti ma te of t he  satur at ion  ef fect. To s how th e satura tione ffect in our A A CM model, wes ol v e dt he i nte raction ofargo n  clu ster s  ( Ar$ _ {147} $) ir ra d ia t ed by two XUV pulse sat $\l ambda  =33$ nm (37. 6 eV) 25-f s a part. Bo th p u ls e s have a full- width -at-half-m a ximum of  10 f s. Altho ugh short p ulses in cre ase  th e p r o ba bility of mul t i phot on  ioniza tio n (whic h u nde rmi nes  o ur signal ), theyal so  a ll owthe p r obe puls etoir rad iatet he clu sterwhil eth e  de nsity i s  s t i ll h ig h(whi chen hance s th e  li kelihoo d of nano pla s ma p er tu rbation s which mustde pend on th epla sma de n s ity). Th e number density of the ions at  th e pea k of  the pump  pu lse is  ar o und $3 .99\ti mes10 ^{ -3} $ bohr$ ^ { -3 }$(w here the d i s tan ce of  t he f urthest  ion is used as th e  ra dius of the s phe rica l vo lum e )w hil ea t t h e  peak of the pr obe pulseth e  d ensity is$ 3.8 4\ times10 ^{-3}$bohr$ ^ {-3}$,a percent  differen ce  ofa b out  3.85%. Fu rther, t he plasma numbe r -d ensit y o f thecl ust er at  the s a meradiu s is $ 1. 27\tim es10^ {- 3}$ bohr $^{-3}$ at the peak ofthe pu mp an d $ 1.58\time s10 ^ {-3 }$ bohr$^ {-3} $ at the p eak  of  thepro b e. Th us,t he  ef f ectsof a n  enhanced ph oto i o ni zation mech a n i smwillbem ost pr onou nced during the p r obe pulse
) where_clusters absorb_less photons due to_fast collisional_ionization_removing target_ions_[@Ackad_cluster_expansion_XUV].

The current work_includes one and_two photon ionization given_by the rate,_$$\frac{dN}{dt}_= \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right) \sigma^{(1)} + \left(\frac{I}{E_{ph}}\right)^2 \sigma^{(2)}$$ where $I$ is the intensity of the laser,_$E_{ph}$_is the_photon_energy_and $\sigma^{(n)}$ is the $n$-th_order photoionization process. The values_of $\sigma^{(1)}=5.0\times_10^{-18}$ cm$^2$ [@Argon_photo_neutral] and $\sigma^{(2)}= 10^{-50}$ cm$^4$/s (taken_as_an upper limit_from reference [@McKenna2004]) were used. The higher $\sigma^{(2)}$ is, the_smaller the range of intensities in_which effective saturation_will_occur,_and thus taking an_upper limit gives a conservative estimate_of the saturation effect. To show_the saturation effect in our AACM model,_we solved the interaction of argon_clusters (Ar$_{147}$) irradiated by two_XUV pulses_at $\lambda =33$ nm (37.6_eV) 25-fs apart._Both pulses_have a full-width-at-half-maximum_of 10 fs. Although short pulses_increase the probability_of multiphoton ionization (which undermines our_signal),_they also allow_the_probe_pulse to_irradiate the cluster_while_the density_is_still high (which enhances the likelihood_of_nanoplasma perturbations which must depend on the_plasma density). The number_density_of the ions at_the peak of the pump_pulse is around $3.99\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ (where_the distance_of the_furthest ion is used as the radius of the spherical volume)_while at the peak of the_probe pulse the density_is $3.84\times10^{-3}$_bohr$^{-3}$,_a percent difference_of_about 3.85%._Further, the plasma number-density of the cluster_at the_same radius is $1.27\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at_the peak of the_pump_and $1.58\times10^{-3}$ bohr$^{-3}$ at the peak_of the probe. Thus, the effects_of an enhanced photoionization mechanism_will_be_most pronounced during the probe_pulse