 case of opaque TP’s is presented in Fig. \[fig:twinfig6\].

The different regions are distinguished according to the values of the two length scales $l_1$ and $l_2$ representing the thicknesses of the sheaths on the two sides of the TP. We assume here, without loss of generality, that $l_1 \geq l_2$. It is striking how different this phase diagram is compared to that for the case of perfect transparency, see Fig. \[fig:twinfig1\]. As we will demonstrate below, the main part of the diagram for the opaque case simply recovers the results of the system with a wall [@IND]. It is important to stress at this stage that we are only interested in the wall results for negative $b$ values since this is the relevant region for TP’s that show TPS.

One ingredient of Fig. \[fig:twinfig6\] concerns the stability of the sheath solutions given in Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\]. From our analysis in Section \[sec:transp\] we know that at bulk coexistence the double symmetric sheath (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](b)) is never stable, and hence plays no significant role. Furthermore, explicit free energy calculations reveal that the discontinuous double sheath (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](c)) has an even higher free energy than the continuous one and thus is irrelevant. The single sheath solution (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](a)) is stable for a certain interval of $\xi/b$ values provided that $\kappa>0.374$ as can be inferred from the results for a system with a wall [@IND; @IND1]. Hence, in the upper right corner of the diagram we retrieve a feature of the wall diagram, with a finite sheath on only one side of the TP while the other side is still in the N phase, thus $l_1>0$ and $l_2=0$. In the lower half of the diagram we have on the low-$\xi/|b|$ side a region where no stable sheath solution exists other than the null solution ($l_1=0$ and $l_2=0$). The two regions are separated either by the line CN (critical nucleation) ending in a tricritical point TCP, or by the short stretch FN (first-order nucleation) between TCP and
case of opaque TP ’s is presented in Fig.   \[fig: twinfig6\ ]. 

 The different regions are distinguish harmonize to the values of the two length scales $ l_1 $ and $ l_2 $ typify the thicknesses of the sheaths on the two english of the TP. We simulate here, without loss of generality, that $ l_1 \geq l_2$. It is striking how different this phase diagram is compare to that for the case of perfect foil, see Fig.   \[fig: twinfig1\ ]. As we will demonstrate below, the main part of the diagram for the opaque case simply recover the results of the system with a wall   [ @IND ]. It is authoritative to stress at this stage that we are only concerned in the wall resultant role for negative $ b$ values since this is the relevant region for TP ’s that usher TPS. 

 One ingredient of Fig.   \[fig: twinfig6\ ] concerns the stability of the sheath solutions given in Fig.   \[fig: twinfig3\ ]. From our analysis in Section   \[sec: transp\ ] we know that at bulk coexistence the double symmetric sheath (Fig.   \[fig: twinfig3\](b) ) is never stable, and hence plays no significant role. Furthermore, explicit free department of energy calculation reveal that the discontinuous bivalent cocktail dress (Fig.   \[fig: twinfig3\](c) ) has an even higher free energy than the continuous one and therefore is irrelevant. The single sheath solution (Fig.   \[fig: twinfig3\](a) ) is static for a certain interval of $ \xi / b$ values provide that $ \kappa>0.374 $ as can be inferred from the results for a system with a wall   [ @IND; @IND1 ]. Hence, in the upper right corner of the diagram we retrieve a feature of the wall diagram, with a finite sheath on only one slope of the TP while the other slope is still in the N phase, thus $ l_1>0 $ and $ l_2=0$. In the lower half of the diagram we have on the low-$\xi/|b|$ slope a region where no stable sheath solution exists early than the null solution ($ l_1=0 $ and $ l_2=0 $). The two regions are separate either by the line CN (critical nucleation) ending in a tricritical compass point TCP, or by the short reach FN (first - order nucleation) between TCP and
 cade of opaque TP’s is prestnted in Fig. \[fig:twnbfig6\].

Thx diffedent regkons are distinguished accorving to tye values of the two ldngth scapes $l_1$ ane $l_2$ cepresenting the thicknesses or the wheaths on the two sides of the TP. We dsrule here, without loss of generality, ehat $l_1 \bee l_2$. It is strihing row spfnerent this phase diagram is comlared tm that for thr case of perfect transparfncy, see Fig. \[fig:twinfig1\]. As we will demjbstrate belod, the main part of the diagram for the opaque case sioply xecovers thg dedolts of the wystei with a wall [@IND]. It hs impottant to stresx av thus stage that we are mnly interested in the wall rzsults for negative $b$ vqlues sinwe tfus ks uhe rslevanh rxgion for TL’s that shoq TPS.

One ingredient os Fig. \[fig:twinfif6\] concqrgs the stability of the sheath solutionv gjven in Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\]. Feom our analysis in Sgction \[sec:twansp\] we know that at bulk coexistence the double symmxtfic smeatf (Flg. \[fig:twinfig3\](b)) is never stable, and hence plays ho spgnificant role. Fmrthermore, expliciy vrrg energy calcuuations rsveal that the disfontinujus diuble shewth (Gig. \[fig:twinfig3\](c)) has an even yigher free vnerty than the continbous one and thux is orrelevant. The single skeath aolution (Fih. \[fig:twinfje3\](a)) is stable for a bertdin interval of $\xi/b$ values provided thac $\kappa>0.374$ xs csn be ynferred fgom tma results for a sydtem cith d wall [@IND; @LND1]. Hence, in the upper right cocier of the disgsam we retrneve a feature of tre wall diagrak, with c finige sheath kn only one side os the TP whila the other smde is styll un tye N phxre, thus $l_1>0$ and $k_2=0$. In the lower half of the diagram we haxs on the low-$\xi/|b|$ siee a region whete vo ftwbke vheath soluthon dxirys otfer than thc njll xolution ($l_1=0$ and $l_2=0$). The two regions are separstcd either by the jine CN (critival nucleation) endlng ii a trmcritival point TCP, or by the short strstch FN (flrsb-order nucleaeion) between TCP and
case of opaque TP’s is presented in The regions are according to the scales and $l_2$ representing thicknesses of the on the two sides of the We assume here, without loss of generality, that $l_1 \geq l_2$. It is how different this phase diagram is compared to that for the case of transparency, Fig. As will demonstrate below, the main part of the diagram for the opaque case simply recovers the of the system with a wall [@IND]. It important to stress at stage that we are only in wall results negative values this is the region for TP’s that show TPS. One ingredient of Fig. \[fig:twinfig6\] concerns the stability of the sheath given in From our in \[sec:transp\] know that at the double symmetric sheath (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](b)) and hence plays no significant role. Furthermore, explicit energy calculations that the discontinuous double sheath (Fig. has an even higher free energy than the one and thus is irrelevant. The single sheath solution (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](a)) is stable for a of $\xi/b$ values provided $\kappa>0.374$ as can inferred the for system with wall [@IND; @IND1]. Hence, in the upper right corner of the we retrieve a feature of the wall diagram, with a on one side of TP while the other is in the N phase, and In of diagram have on the low-$\xi/|b|$ a region where no stable solution exists other than $l_2=0$). The two regions are separated either by line CN (critical nucleation) ending in a point TCP, or by the short stretch FN (first-order nucleation) between TCP
 case of opaque TP’s is presenteD in Fig. \[fig:tWinfiG6\].

ThE diFfErenT regIons are distingUIsheD according to the values oF the tWo LEngtH ScAles $l_1$ And $l_2$ repREsENTinG tHe ThiCkNEsSes of The Sheaths On the two siDes Of The TP. We assumE HeRe, without lOss Of generality, ThaT $l_1 \geq l_2$. it Is sTRikinG hoW diffErent tHIs phasE diagram iS cOMpared TO that foR THe Case Of perfect transparENcY, See Fig. \[fig:twinfIg1\]. As we WiLL dEMOnsTraTe below, the MaIn parT Of the diAGrAM FOr tHE opaque case siMply recoverS The ResultS oF thE System With a WaLL [@INd]. It is importAnt tO stress at This stAGe that wE Are only IntereSteD in The wALl ReSulTs FOr nEGaTivE $B$ vaLues sincE tHiS is thE relEVANT regIon For Tp’s thaT show TPS.

One inGreDienT Of FIg. \[fig:TwinfIg6\] coNcErns tHe stabIlity Of The sheath solutiOns gIven in Fig. \[Fig:TwInfIg3\]. from oUR analySis In SEction \[sEc:transP\] We kNoW THAt At bulk coexistence tHe DOUbLe symmetRic sheATh (fiG. \[Fig:twinfIg3\](B)) is NeveR STable, And hENcE plays no SignifICaNt Role. FurThErmore, ExPliCit Free eNErgy CalculAtions reVeal tHAt the discontinUOus double sheaTH (FIG. \[FiG:TwinFig3\](C)) has an even hIgheR Free EnerGY tHan THe conTinuoUs ONe ANd thus is irrelevant. THe Single SheatH solution (Fig. \[fIg:twinfig3\](a)) IS STable for A cerTAiN Interval of $\xi/b$ vAlues Provided thAT $\kappa>0.374$ as Can be Inferred From the reSULts for a sYstEm wIth A waLL [@iNd; @IND1]. Hence, in thE UPper RiGht cornEr oF the diaGraM we RetRieVe A feature oF the wall DiAgRaM, wIth A finiTE sheath oN oNly OnE siDe of tHE TP whiLe the OtheR sIdE Is sTill in tHE N PHAse, tHuS $l_1>0$ And $l_2=0$. in tHe Lower Half OF thE diagraM we have on The LOw-$\xi/|B|$ sIdE a regioN where no stablE sHeath solutIoN exIsts otHER than the Null solution ($l_1=0$ and $l_2=0$). The two REgions aRe sEparaTed eIther by thE liNe CN (crItiCAl nuclEation) EndinG iN a tRICritiCAL pOinT TcP, or by the sHORt sTretcH Fn (firSt-order Nucleation) between Tcp anD
 case of opaque TP’s is pr esented in  Fig.  \[ fig :t winf ig6\ ].

The differ e nt r egions are distinguish ed ac co r ding to  thevalueso ft h e t wo  l eng th sc ales$l_ 1$ and$l_2$ repr ese nt ing the thic k ne sses of th e s heaths on th e t wo sid es  of the T P.We as sume h e re, wi thout los so f gene r ality,t h at  $l_ 1 \geq l_2$. It i s  s t riking how dif ferent  t h is p has e d iagram isco mpare d  to tha t  f o r the case of perfe ct transpar e ncy , seeFi g.\ [fig:t winfi g1 \ ].As we willdemo nstrate b elow,t he main part of  the d iag ram  for th eopa qu e  ca s esim p lyrecovers  t he  resu ltso f t he s yst em w ith a  wall [@IND].  It  isi mpo rtant  to s tres sat th is sta ge th at  we are only in tere sted in t hewa llre sults for ne gat ive  $b$ va lues si n ceth i s is  the relevant regi on f or  TP’s th at sho w  T PS . 

One in gr edi ento f  Fig.  \[f i g: twinfig6 \] con c er ns  the st ab ilityof  th e s heath solu tionsgiven in  Fig. \[fig:twinfig3 \ ]. From our a n al y s is in S ect ion \[sec:t rans p \] w e kn o wtha t  at b ulk c oe x is t ence the double sym me tric s heath  (Fig. \[fig: twinfig3\] ( b ) ) is nev er s t ab l e, and hence p laysno signifi c ant role . Fur thermore , explici t free ene rgy  ca lcu lat i o ns  reveal thatt h e di sc ontinuo usdoubleshe ath  (F ig.  \ [fig:twin fig3\](c ))  h as  a n e ven h i gher fre eene rg y t han t h e cont inuou s on ean d  th us is i r re l e vant .Th e si ngl esheat h so l uti on (Fig . \[fig:t win f ig3\ ]( a) ) is st able for a ce rt ain interv al  of  $\xi/ b $  valuesprovided that $\kappa>0 . 374$ as  ca n beinfe rred from  th e resu lts for asystem  with  a  wa l l  [@IN D ;  @ IND 1] . Hence, i n the  uppe rrigh t corne r of the diagram w e  re trieve a feat ure  oft h ewal l  d i agr am ,  wi t h  a finite sheat h on onlyon e  s ide of the TPwh ile the  othersidei s still  in the N  phase, t hu s $l _ 1 >0$  and $l_2= 0$. In t he lowerh alf o f  t he di agr am weha veon th e low- $ \xi /|b|$  sidearegion  wher eno stabl e sheath solution exist s othe r tha n t he null s olu t ion  ($l_1=0$  and  $l_2=0$).  Th e t wo re gio n s are  sep a ra ted eithe r by the lineC N(cr i t ic al nucleati o n )  en dingina  tricr itic al point TCP, orb y the short st retc h FN(fi r st-o rd er nucleation)  be tw e e n TCP an d
 case_of opaque_TP’s is presented in_Fig. \[fig:twinfig6\].

The different_regions_are distinguished_according_to the values_of the two_length scales $l_1$ and_$l_2$ representing the_thicknesses_of the sheaths on the two sides of the TP. We assume here, without_loss_of generality,_that_$l_1_\geq l_2$. It is striking_how different this phase diagram_is compared_to that for the case of perfect transparency,_see_Fig. \[fig:twinfig1\]. As we_will demonstrate below, the main part of the diagram_for the opaque case simply recovers_the results of_the_system_with a wall [@IND]. It_is important to stress at this_stage that we are only interested_in the wall results for negative $b$_values since this is the relevant_region for TP’s that show_TPS.

One ingredient_of Fig. \[fig:twinfig6\] concerns the stability_of the sheath_solutions given_in Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\]. From_our analysis in Section \[sec:transp\] we know_that at bulk_coexistence the double symmetric sheath (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](b))_is_never stable, and_hence_plays_no significant_role. Furthermore, explicit_free_energy calculations_reveal_that the discontinuous double sheath (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](c))_has_an even higher free energy than the_continuous one and thus_is_irrelevant. The single sheath_solution (Fig. \[fig:twinfig3\](a)) is stable for_a certain interval of $\xi/b$ values_provided that_$\kappa>0.374$ as_can be inferred from the results for a system with a_wall [@IND; @IND1]. Hence, in the upper_right corner of the_diagram we_retrieve_a feature of_the_wall diagram,_with a finite sheath on only one_side of_the TP while the other side_is still in the_N_phase, thus $l_1>0$ and $l_2=0$. In_the lower half of the diagram_we have on the low-$\xi/|b|$_side_a_region where no stable sheath_solution exists other than the null_solution ($l_1=0$ and_$l_2=0$). The two regions are separated either_by_the line CN (critical nucleation) ending_in_a tricritical point TCP, or by_the_short_stretch FN (first-order nucleation) between_TCP and