 lower the $\Lambda$-value, the less rotation and rotational support within the galaxy. For an elliptical galaxy in gravitational equilibrium, the spin parameter simplifies to $\Lambda
\sim 0.3 <(\Omega R / \sigma_v)>$ [@fall79], yielding $\Lambda =
0.10$ with $(\Omega R / \sigma_v) = 0.33$ for the entire population of GCs in NGC 5128.

Table \[tab:spin\] shows the spin parameter for four giant galaxies with large GCS kinematic studies, M87, M49, NGC 1399, and NGC 5128. The table columns give the galaxy name, the rotation amplitude, the projected velocity dispersion, and the ratio of the rotation amplitude to the velocity dispersion, followed by the spin parameter. These quantities are shown for the metal-poor and metal-rich populations. What is clearly evident in Table \[tab:spin\] is the strong galaxy to galaxy differences between these four galaxies, already hinted at in § \[sec:intro\]. Though the sample is still quite small, no obvious pattern emerges. There is an indication of metal-poor and metal-rich GCSs having similar spin parameters within the same galaxy. M49 is the only galaxy studied here where this may not be the case. Although the metal-poor and metal-rich cluster spin parameters are consistent within the uncertainties, the metal-rich cluster spin parameter of M49 is also consistent with zero.

In the monolithic collapse scenario, [@peebles69] describes the angular momentum within the galaxy as attributed to the tidal torque transferred from neighbouring proto-galaxies during formation. In this scenario, [@efstathiou79] found that a spin parameter of $\Lambda = 0.06$ for elliptical systems is expected from simulations of the collapse of an isolated protogalactic cloud. But NGC 5128, among many other giant elliptical galaxies, is not in isolation, and therefore not necessarily expected to reproduce such a low spin parameter. Also, the internal rotation axis changes at 5 kpc are not easily explained with only the monolithic collapse scenario. In the monolithic collapse model, the inner regions would be expected to have more pronounced rotations. Yet all four of the galaxies with major kinematic studies presented here do not show a higher rotational signal in the inner regions. In fact, for NGC 1399, the outer region ($R > 6'$) indicates rotation in the metal-poor population that is not evident in the inner regions.
lower the $ \Lambda$-value, the less rotation and rotational support within the galaxy. For an elliptical galax in gravitational chemical equilibrium, the spin parameter simplifies to $ \Lambda 
 \sim 0.3 < (\Omega R / \sigma_v)>$ [ @fall79 ], render $ \Lambda = 
 0.10 $ with $ (\Omega R / \sigma_v) = 0.33 $ for the integral population of GCs in NGC 5128. 

 Table   \[tab: spin\ ] shows the spin argument for four elephantine galaxies with large GCS kinematic studies, M87, M49, NGC 1399, and NGC 5128. The table columns collapse the galaxy name, the rotation amplitude, the projected speed dispersion, and the ratio of the rotation amplitude to the velocity dispersion, followed by the spin parameter. These measure are shown for the metal - poor and alloy - rich populations. What is clearly evident in Table   \[tab: spin\ ] is the potent galaxy to galaxy differences between these four galaxies, already hinted at in §   \[sec: intro\ ]. Though the sample is however quite small, no obvious pattern emerges. There is an indication of metal - poor and metal - rich GCSs having similar spin parameters within the same galaxy. M49 is the only galax analyze here where this may not be the case. Although the alloy - hapless and metal - rich cluster tailspin parameters are reproducible within the uncertainties, the metal - full-bodied cluster spin parameter of M49 is also consistent with zero. 

 In the monolithic crash scenario, [ @peebles69 ] describes the angular momentum within the galaxy as attributed to the tidal torque transplant from neighbor proto - galaxies during formation. In this scenario, [ @efstathiou79 ] found that a tailspin parameter of $ \Lambda = 0.06 $ for elliptical systems is expected from simulations of the collapse of an isolated protogalactic cloud. But NGC 5128, among many other elephantine elliptical galaxies, is not in isolation, and therefore not necessarily expected to regurgitate such a low spin parameter. Also, the home rotation axis change at 5 kpc are not easily explained with only the monolithic collapse scenario. In the massive collapse model, the inner area would be expected to have more pronounced rotations. Yet all four of the galaxy with major kinematic studies presented here do not prove a higher rotational signal in the inner regions. In fact, for NGC 1399, the outer region ($ R > 6'$) indicate rotation in the metal - poor population that is not evident in the inner regions.
 loaer the $\Lambda$-value, the uess rotation aue rotavional aupport dithin the galaxy. For an ellmptixal gqlaxy in gravitational equilibrpum, the spin karameter simplifmss to $\Lambda
\sjl 0.3 <(\Okxga R / \sigma_v)>$ [@fsll79], yielditg $\Lambda =
0.10$ witv $(\Umzga R / \sigma_v) = 0.33$ for the entire populwtion og HCs in NGC 5128.

Tabje \[tan:fpin\] shows the spin parameter for four giant jalaxies with lsrge GCS kinematic studies, M87, M49, NGC 1399, and NGC 5128. The table colunns duve the galaby name, tht xotation amklitude, the projected velocity dksperxion, and tye rahho of the ritatijn amplitude to the eelocitu dispersion, fpllmwee by the spin parametxr. These quantities wre shown fkr the metal-poor qne metdl-riwh pupulxtiknx. Shat id cmearly evisent in Taboe \[tab:spin\] is the sttogt galaxy to gzlaxy qisferences between these four galaxies, anrezdy hinted at in § \[sec:inteo\]. Though the sample ls still zuite small, no obvious pattern emerges. There is at indmcxtiin ud letal-poor and metal-rich GCSs having similar s[jn psrameters withln the same galaxy. M49 ix the only galxxy stbsisd here where this may noj be tye case. Ajthoigh the metal-poor and metal-eich cluster wpin parameters arz consistent witnin tne uncertainties, the mecal-ricg cluster soin paramsger of M49 is also coksivtent wiuf zero.

In the monojithic coolapxe scenxrio, [@peeblqs69] describfs thc angular momentum aithiu the galaxy as attributed to the tidal torque transferred ftom nepghbouriny protp-galaxies duryng formation. Nn this fcenafio, [@efstatgiou79] fonnd that a s[in parameter lf $\Lambda = 0.06$ hor ellipeicao sywtems ir expected from simulations of the collapse of an isplajes protogalactic cliud. But NGC 5128, ampng magy ovher dhant elliptiwal ealxcies, ks not in iwulatoon, and therefore nod nedessarily expected tj reprodoce such w low spin patameter. Also, the ijternel rotetion sxif changes at 5 kpc are not easimy explaijed with only tre minolithic coklapse scenario. In the monolithic colla'se model, the inner reguons would be expecjed to have moce progounced rmtations. Yet all foue of the galaxies with major kinematic studias prfsented here do not show a higher rotational signal in the inner regions. Un facv, sor NGC 1399, ths ouyer rvgiju ($R > 6'$) igdicetxs rotation in thv metal-poor population that is nut evidett in the inner regions.
lower the $\Lambda$-value, the less rotation and within galaxy. For elliptical galaxy in simplifies $\Lambda \sim 0.3 R / \sigma_v)>$ yielding $\Lambda = 0.10$ with $(\Omega / \sigma_v) = 0.33$ for the entire population of GCs in NGC 5128. \[tab:spin\] shows the spin parameter for four giant galaxies with large GCS kinematic M87, NGC and 5128. The table columns give the galaxy name, the rotation amplitude, the projected velocity dispersion, and ratio of the rotation amplitude to the velocity followed by the spin These quantities are shown for metal-poor metal-rich populations. is evident Table \[tab:spin\] is strong galaxy to galaxy differences between these four galaxies, already hinted at in § \[sec:intro\]. Though the is still no obvious emerges. is indication of metal-poor GCSs having similar spin parameters within M49 is the only galaxy studied here where may not the case. Although the metal-poor and cluster spin parameters are consistent within the uncertainties, metal-rich cluster spin parameter of M49 is also consistent with zero. In the monolithic collapse describes the angular momentum the galaxy as to tidal transferred neighbouring proto-galaxies formation. In this scenario, [@efstathiou79] found that a spin parameter of = 0.06$ for elliptical systems is expected from simulations of of isolated protogalactic cloud. NGC 5128, among many giant galaxies, is not in therefore necessarily such low parameter. Also, the internal axis changes at 5 kpc not easily explained with In the monolithic collapse model, the inner regions be expected to have more pronounced rotations. all four of the galaxies with major kinematic studies presented here do show a signal in the inner regions. In fact, for 1399, the outer region > 6'$) indicates rotation in the metal-poor population that not in the regions.
 lower the $\Lambda$-value, the lesS rotation aNd rotAtiOnaL sUppoRt wiThin the galaxy. FOR an eLliptical galaxy in graviTatioNaL EquiLIbRium, tHe spin pARaMETer SiMpLifIeS To $\lambdA
\siM 0.3 <(\Omega R / \Sigma_v)>$ [@fall79], YieLdIng $\Lambda =
0.10$ witH $(\omEga R / \sigma_v) = 0.33$ For The entire popUlaTion of gCS in ngC 5128.

TabLe \[tAb:spiN\] shows THe spin Parameter FoR Four giANt galaxIES wIth lArge GCS kinematic sTUdIEs, M87, M49, NGC 1399, and NGC 5128. THe tablE cOLuMNS giVe tHe galaxy naMe, The roTAtion amPLiTUDE, thE Projected veloCity dispersIOn, aNd the rAtIo oF The rotAtion AmPLitUde to the velOcitY dispersiOn, follOWed by thE Spin parAmeter. theSe qUantITiEs Are ShOWn fOR tHe mETal-Poor and mEtAl-Rich pOpulATIONs. WhAt iS cleArly eVident in Table \[Tab:Spin\] IS thE stroNg galAxy tO gAlaxy DifferEnces BeTween these four gAlaxIes, alreadY hiNtEd aT iN § \[sec:iNTro\]. ThoUgh The Sample iS still qUIte SmALL, No Obvious pattern emerGeS. tHeRe is an inDicatiON oF mETal-poor aNd MetAl-riCH gCSs hAvinG SiMilar spiN paramETeRs Within tHe Same gaLaXy. M49 Is tHe onlY GalaXy studIed here wHere tHIs may not be the cASe. Although the MEtAL-PoOR and MetAl-rich clustEr spIN parAmetERs Are COnsisTent wItHIn THe uncertainties, the mEtAl-rich ClustEr spin parametEr of M49 is alsO CONsistent With ZErO.

in the monolithiC collApse scenarIO, [@peebles69] DescrIbes the aNgular momENTum withiN thE gaLaxY as ATTrIbuted to the tiDAL torQuE transfErrEd from nEigHboUriNg pRoTo-galaxieS during fOrMaTiOn. in tHis scENario, [@efsTaThiOu79] FouNd thaT A spin pArameTer oF $\LAmBDa = 0.06$ fOr ellipTIcAL SystEmS iS expEctEd From sImulATioNs of the Collapse oF an ISolaTeD pRotogalActic cloud. But nGc 5128, among many OtHer Giant eLLIptical gAlaxies, is not in isolation, ANd thereForE not nEcesSarily expEctEd to reProDUce sucH a low sPin paRaMetER. also, tHE InTerNaL rotation aXIS chAnges At 5 Kpc aRe not eaSily explained with oNLy tHe monolithic cOllApse SCEnAriO. in THe mOnOLitHIC collapse model, tHe inner regIoNS wOuld be expeCTed To Have morE pronouNced rOTations. yet all fouR of the galAxIes wITH maJor kinematIc studieS presenteD Here dO NoT show A hiGher roTaTioNal siGnal in THe iNner rEgions. in Fact, foR NGC 1399, tHe Outer regIon ($R > 6'$) indicates rotation in The metAl-pooR poPulation tHat IS noT evident iN the Inner regioNs.
 lower the $\Lambda$-value , the less  rota tio n a nd  rot atio nal support wi t hinthe galaxy. For an ell iptic al gala x yin gr avitati o na l equ il ib riu m, th e spi n p aramete r simplifi esto  $\Lambda
\s i m0.3 <(\Ome gaR / \sigma_v )>$  [@fal l7 9], yield ing  $\La mbda = 0.10$with $(\O me g a R /\ sigma_v ) =0.33 $ for the entirep op u lation of GCsin NGC  5 1 28 . 
Ta ble  \[tab:spi n\ ] sho w s the s p in p a ram e ter for fourgiant galax i eswith l ar geG CS kin emati cs tud ies, M87, M 49,NGC 1399,  and N G C 5128. The tab le col umn s g ivet he  g ala xy nam e ,the rot ation am pl it ude,thep r o j ecte d v eloc ity d ispersion, an d t he r a tio  of t he ro tati on  ampl itudeto th evelocity disper sion , followe d b ythe  s pin p a ramete r.The se quan titiesa resh o w n  f or the metal-pooran d me tal-rich  popul a ti on s . What i scle arly e viden t in Ta ble \[ta b:spin \ ]is  the st ro ng gal ax y t o g alaxy diff erence s betwee n the s e four galaxie s , already hin t ed a ti n §\[s ec:intro\].  Tho u gh t he s a mp lei s sti ll qu it e  s m all, no obvious pat te rn eme rges.  There is anindication o f  metal-p oora nd metal-rich GCS s hav ing simila r  spin pa ramet ers with in the sa m e  galaxy.  M4 9 i s t heo n ly  galaxy studi e d  her ewhere t his  may no t b e t hecas e.  Although  the met al -p oo rand  meta l -rich cl us ter  s pin  para m etersare c onsi st en t  wi thin th e  u n c erta in ti es,the  m etal- rich clu ster sp in parame ter of M 49  i s alsoconsistent wi th  zero.

In  t hemonoli t h ic colla pse scenario, [@peebles 6 9] desc rib es th e an gular mom ent um wit hin the ga laxy a s att ri but e d  to t h e  t ida ltorque tra n s fer red f ro m ne ighbour ing proto-galaxies dur ing formation . I n th i s  s cen a ri o , [ @e f sta t h iou79] found th at a spinpa r am eter of $\ L amb da  = 0.06 $ for e llipt i cal sys tems is e xpected f ro m si m u lat ions of th e collap se of ani solat e dproto gal acticcl oud . But  NGC 5 1 28,  amon g many  o ther g iantel liptical  galaxies, is not in is olatio n, an d t hereforenot nec essarilyexpe cted to re pro duc e suc h a low s pinp ar ame t er. A lso, the inter n al  ro t a ti on axis cha n g e s a t 5 k pca re not  eas ily explained wit h  only the mono lith i c  co lla p se s ce nario. In themon ol i t hic coll ap se model, t he inner  r e gions  would  be ex pectedt o  h a ve mor e pr ono unced rot ati on s . Yet a ll  f o ur ofthega laxies  withm ajor k inematic studies  pres e n ted h e redo no tshow ah ighe r rotation al signal i n theinne r reg ions. I nfact,for  N GC 1399, t h e outer r egion  ($R >6' $) i ndi catesrota t i on in  the  m eta l-poor po p u la t io nt hat  isnot e vi dent  in the i n ner regi ons . 
 lower_the $\Lambda$-value,_the less rotation and_rotational support_within_the galaxy._For_an elliptical galaxy_in gravitational equilibrium,_the spin parameter simplifies_to $\Lambda
\sim 0.3_<(\Omega_R / \sigma_v)>$ [@fall79], yielding $\Lambda =
0.10$ with $(\Omega R / \sigma_v) = 0.33$_for_the entire_population_of_GCs in NGC 5128.

Table \[tab:spin\] shows_the spin parameter for four_giant galaxies_with large GCS kinematic studies, M87, M49, NGC_1399,_and NGC 5128._The table columns give the galaxy name, the rotation_amplitude, the projected velocity dispersion, and_the ratio of_the_rotation_amplitude to the velocity_dispersion, followed by the spin parameter._These quantities are shown for the_metal-poor and metal-rich populations. What is clearly_evident in Table \[tab:spin\] is the strong_galaxy to galaxy differences between_these four_galaxies, already hinted at in_§ \[sec:intro\]. Though the_sample is_still quite small,_no obvious pattern emerges. There is_an indication of_metal-poor and metal-rich GCSs having similar_spin_parameters within the_same_galaxy._M49 is_the only galaxy_studied_here where_this_may not be the case. Although_the_metal-poor and metal-rich cluster spin parameters are_consistent within the uncertainties,_the_metal-rich cluster spin parameter_of M49 is also consistent_with zero.

In the monolithic collapse scenario,_[@peebles69] describes_the angular_momentum within the galaxy as attributed to the tidal torque transferred_from neighbouring proto-galaxies during formation. In_this scenario, [@efstathiou79] found_that a_spin_parameter of $\Lambda_=_0.06$ for_elliptical systems is expected from simulations of_the collapse_of an isolated protogalactic cloud. But_NGC 5128, among many_other_giant elliptical galaxies, is not in_isolation, and therefore not necessarily expected_to reproduce such a low_spin_parameter._Also, the internal rotation axis_changes at 5 kpc are not_easily explained with_only the monolithic collapse scenario. In the_monolithic_collapse model, the inner regions would_be_expected to have more pronounced rotations._Yet_all_four of the galaxies with_major kinematic studies presented here do_not show a higher rotational signal in the inner_regions. In fact,_for NGC 1399, the outer_region_($R_> 6'$) indicates rotation in the metal-poor population that is_not evident_in the inner_regions.