}}_{2f}} \right).
\end{array}$$ Stability of the proposed control scheme in (\[eq28\]) is analysed in the following theorem.

**Theorem 1.** The proposed control law (\[eq28\]) guarantees the closed-loop system (\[eq14\]) to be asymptotically stable.

From (\[eq25\]), the derivative of the second Lyapunov function candidate, ${{\dot{V}}_{2}}$, can be rewritten by $$\label{eq29}
\begin{array}{r@{}l@{\qquad}l}
 {{{\dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{s}}}^{T}}\left( {{\lambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right) \right) \\ 
 =&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign({s})-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{3}}{s} \\
 &+{{{s}}^{T}}\left( {{c}_{2}}sign\left( s \right)+{{\lambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s} \right).  
\end{array}$$ Substituting the control input in (\[eq28\]) into (\[eq29\]) leads to $$\label{30}
{{\dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign\left( {{s}} \right)-{{s}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{s}<0.$$ Therefore, based on the Lyapunov stability theory the sliding surface $s$ is asymptotically stable.

Adaptive dynamic surface control for uncertain DAR systems
----------------------------------------------------------

The deterministic control law (\[eq28\]) can be effectively employed provided that the system parameters are certain. Nevertheless, in practice, the DAR system operates under system uncertainties such as parameter variations and nonlinearities or external disturbances. In other words, it is impractical to accurately determine the system parameters in $K(\theta,\dot{\theta },\ddot{\theta })$.
} } _ { 2f } } \right). 
 \end{array}$$ Stability of the proposed control scheme in (\[eq28\ ]) is analysed in the follow theorem. 

 * * Theorem 1. * * The aim control law (\[eq28\ ]) guarantees the shut - loop system (\[eq14\ ]) to be asymptotically stable. 

 From (\[eq25\ ]), the derived function of the second Lyapunov function candidate, $ { { \dot{V}}_{2}}$, can be rewrite by $ $ \label{eq29 } 
 \begin{array}{r@{}l@{\qquad}l } 
  { { { \dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{s}}}^{T}}\left ({ { \lambda } } { { { \dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left (K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha } } } } _ { 2f } } \right) \right) \\ 
  = & -{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign({s})-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{3}}{s } \\ 
  & + { { { s}}^{T}}\left ({ { c}_{2}}sign\left (s \right)+{{\lambda } } { { { \dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left (K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha } } } } _ { 2f } } \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s } \right).  
 \end{array}$$ Substituting the control stimulation in (\[eq28\ ]) into (\[eq29\ ]) leads to $ $ \label{30 } 
 { { \dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign\left ({ { s } } \right)-{{s}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{s}<0.$$ Therefore, free-base on the Lyapunov stability theory the sliding surface $ s$ is asymptotically stable. 

 Adaptive dynamic open control for uncertain DAR systems 
 ---------------------------------------------------------- 

 The deterministic command law (\[eq28\ ]) can be effectively employed provided that the arrangement parameters are certain. Nevertheless, in practice, the DAR system operate on under system uncertainties such as parameter variations and nonlinearities or external disturbances. In other words, it is impractical to accurately determine the system parameters in $ K(\theta,\dot{\theta }, \ddot{\theta }) $.
}}_{2f}} \rlght).
\end{array}$$ Stability on the proposed control vcheme in (\[eq28\]) ir analysed in the following vheoeem.

**Thtjrem 1.** The proposed control paw (\[eq28\]) gyaraitees the closed-loop sysbzm (\[eq14\]) bo be esymptotically xtable.

From (\[eq25\]), the derivadixe of the second Lyapunov function cagdidate, ${{\dlt{V}}_{2}}$, can be rewtittem by $$\mabel{eq29}
\begin{array}{r@{}l@{\qquad}l}
 {{{\dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{a}}}^{T}}\left( {{\nambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\lrft( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right) \rihht) \\ 
 =&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign({s})-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{3}}{s} \\
 &+{{{s}}^{T}}\left( {{c}_{2}}sugn\lqdt( s \right)+{{\laobda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\ampha }}}}_{2f}} \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s} \right).  
\end{array}$$ Rubstntuting the cintgml input in (\[eq28\]) igto (\[eq29\]) leads to $$\laben{30}
{{\dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{v}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign\left( {{x}} \rmght)-{{w}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{s}<0.$$ Therefore, based mn the Lyapunov stwbility tvekry the sliding syrdace $v$ is asyoptogiczlky stablf.

Adeptive dynajic surface control for uncertsig DAR systems
----------------------------------------------------------

Tge detqriinistic control law (\[eq28\]) can be effectivtly ejployed provided that tye system parameters wre certayn. Nevertheless, in practice, the DAR system operatas unvef svwtem jbcfrtainties such as parameter variations and njhlonvarities or exterkal disturbances. Im ltngr words, it is impraefidal to accurately fetermige thw system karamrters in $K(\theta,\dot{\theta },\ddor{\theta })$.
}}_{2f}} \right). \end{array}$$ Stability of the proposed in is analysed the following theorem. law guarantees the closed-loop (\[eq14\]) to be stable. From (\[eq25\]), the derivative of second Lyapunov function candidate, ${{\dot{V}}_{2}}$, can be rewritten by $$\label{eq29} \begin{array}{r@{}l@{\qquad}l} {{{\dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{s}}}^{T}}\left( {{\lambda K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right) \right) \\ =&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign({s})-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{3}}{s} \\ &+{{{s}}^{T}}\left( {{c}_{2}}sign\left( s \right)+{{\lambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s} \end{array}$$ the input in (\[eq28\]) into (\[eq29\]) leads to $$\label{30} {{\dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign\left( {{s}} \right)-{{s}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{s}<0.$$ Therefore, based on the Lyapunov theory the sliding surface $s$ is asymptotically stable. dynamic surface control for DAR systems ---------------------------------------------------------- The deterministic law can be employed that system parameters are Nevertheless, in practice, the DAR system operates under system uncertainties such as parameter variations and nonlinearities or disturbances. In it is to determine system parameters in })$.
}}_{2f}} \right).
\end{array}$$ Stability of The proposeD contRol SchEmE in (\[eQ28\]) is aNalysed in the foLLowiNg theorem.

**Theorem 1.** The proPosed CoNTrol LAw (\[Eq28\]) guaRantees THe CLOseD-lOoP syStEM (\[eQ14\]) to be AsyMptoticAlly stable.

froM (\[eQ25\]), the derivatiVE oF the second lyaPunov functioN caNdidatE, ${{\dOt{V}}_{2}}$, CAn be rEwrItten By $$\labeL{Eq29}
\begiN{array}{r@{}l@{\qQuAD}l}
 {{{\dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{Z}}}_{1}}^{t}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{s}}}^{T}}\leFT( {{\LaMbda }}{{{\Dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alPHa }}}}_{2F}} \Right) \right) \\ 
 =&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{S}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sigN({s})-{{S}}^{t}{{c}_{3}}{S} \\
 &+{{{S}}^{t}}\leFt( {{c}_{2}}Sign\left( s \rIgHt)+{{\lamBDa }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\LEfT( k+{U}-m{{{{\doT{\Alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s} \Right).  
\end{arrAY}$$ SuBstituTiNg tHE contrOl inpUt IN (\[eq28\]) Into (\[eq29\]) leads To $$\laBel{30}
{{\dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{C}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sIGn\left( {{s}} \RIght)-{{s}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{S}<0.$$ ThereForE, baSed oN ThE LYapUnOV stABiLitY TheOry the slIdInG surfAce $s$ IS ASYmptOtiCallY stabLe.

Adaptive dynAmiC surFAce ContrOl for UnceRtAin DAr systeMs
----------------------------------------------------------

The DeTerministic contRol lAw (\[eq28\]) can be EffEcTivElY emplOYed proVidEd tHat the sYstem paRAmeTeRS ARe Certain. NeverthelesS, iN PRaCtice, the dAR sysTEm OpERates undEr SysTem uNCErtaiNtieS SuCh as paraMeter vARiAtIons and NoNlineaRiTieS or ExterNAl diSturbaNces. In otHer woRDs, it is impractiCAl to accuratelY DeTERmINe thE syStem parametErs iN $k(\theTa,\doT{\ThEta },\DDot{\thEta })$.
}}_{2f}} \right).
\end{arr ay}$$ Stab ility  of  th eprop osed  control schem e  in(\[eq28\]) is analysed  in t he foll o wi ng th eorem.** T h eor em  1 .**  T h epropo sed  contro l law (\[e q28 \] ) guarantees th e closed-l oop  system (\[e q14 \]) to  b e a s ympto tic allystable . 

From  (\[eq25\ ]) ,  the d e rivativ e of  the  second Lyapunovf un c tion candidate , ${{\ do t {V } } _{2 }}$ , can be r ew ritte n  by $$\ l ab e l { eq2 9 }
\begin{arra y}{r@{}l@{\ q qua d}l}
{{ {\d o t{V}}} _{2}} =& - {{{ {z}}}_{1}}^ {T}{ {c}_{1}}{ {{{z}} } _{1}}+{ { {{s}}}^ {T}}\l eft ( { {\la m bd a}}{ {{ \ dot { {z }}} } _{1 }}+{{M}^ {- 1} }\lef t( K + { u } -M{{ {{\ dot{ \alph a }}}}_{2f}}\ri ght) \ri ght)\\ 
=&-{ {{ {z}}} _{1}}^ {T}{{ c} _{1}}{{{{z}}}_{ 1}}- {{s}}^{T} {{c }_ {2} }s ign({ s })-{{s }}^ {T} {{c}_{3 }}{s} \ \ 
 & +{ { { s }} ^{T}}\left( {{c}_{ 2} } s ig n\left(s \rig h t) +{ { \lambda}} {{{ \dot { { z}}}} _{1} } +{ {M}^{-1} }\left (  K +{ u}-M{{{ {\ dot{\a lp ha}}} }_{2f } } \r ight)+ {{c}_{3} }{s}\ right).  
\end { array}$$ Subs t it u t in g  the  co ntrol input  in( \[eq 28\] )  i nto (\[eq 29\])  l e ad s  to $$\label{30}
{{ \d ot{V}} _{2}} =-{{{z}}_{1}} ^{T}{{c}_{ 1 } } {{{z}}_{ 1}}- { {s } }^{T}{{c}_{2}} sign\ left( {{s} }  \right) -{{s} ^{T}}{{c }_{3}}{s} < 0 .$$ Ther efo re,  ba sed o nthe Lyapunovs t abil it y theor y t he slid ing  su rfa ce$s $ is asym ptotical ly  s ta bl e.
Adap t ive dyna mi c s ur fac e con t rol fo r unc erta in  D A R s ystems- -- - - ---- -- -- ---- --- -- ----- ---- - --- ------- --------- --- - ---
T he  determ inistic contr ol  law (\[eq 28 \])  can b e effectiv ely employed provided t h at thesys tem p aram eters are  ce rtain.  Ne v erthel ess, i n pra ct ice , the D A R  s yst em  operatesu n der  syst em  unc ertaint ies such as parame t ervariations an d n onli n e ar iti e so r e xt e rna l disturbances. I n other wo rd s ,it is impr a cti ca l to ac curatel y det e rmine t he system  paramete rs  in$ K (\t heta,\dot{ \theta } ,\ddot{\t h eta } ) $. 
}}_{2f}} \right).
\end{array}$$_Stability of_the proposed control scheme_in (\[eq28\])_is_analysed in_the_following theorem.

**Theorem 1.**_The proposed control_law (\[eq28\]) guarantees the_closed-loop system (\[eq14\])_to_be asymptotically stable.

From (\[eq25\]), the derivative of the second Lyapunov function candidate, ${{\dot{V}}_{2}}$, can_be_rewritten by_$$\label{eq29}
\begin{array}{r@{}l@{\qquad}l}
_{{{\dot{V}}}_{2}}=&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}+{{{{s}}}^{T}}\left(_{{\lambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right)_\right) \\ 
 =&-{{{{z}}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{{z}}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign({s})-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{3}}{s} \\
_&+{{{s}}^{T}}\left( {{c}_{2}}sign\left(_s \right)+{{\lambda }}{{{\dot{{z}}}}_{1}}+{{M}^{-1}}\left( K+{u}-M{{{{\dot{\alpha }}}}_{2f}} \right)+{{c}_{3}}{s} \right). _
\end{array}$$_Substituting the control_input in (\[eq28\]) into (\[eq29\]) leads to $$\label{30}
{{\dot{V}}_{2}}=-{{{z}}_{1}}^{T}{{c}_{1}}{{{z}}_{1}}-{{s}}^{T}{{c}_{2}}sign\left( {{s}}_\right)-{{s}^{T}}{{c}_{3}}{s}<0.$$ Therefore, based on the Lyapunov_stability theory the_sliding_surface_$s$ is asymptotically stable.

Adaptive_dynamic surface control for uncertain DAR_systems
----------------------------------------------------------

The deterministic control law (\[eq28\]) can_be effectively employed provided that the system_parameters are certain. Nevertheless, in practice,_the DAR system operates under_system uncertainties_such as parameter variations and_nonlinearities or external_disturbances. In_other words, it_is impractical to accurately determine the_system parameters in_$K(\theta,\dot{\theta },\ddot{\theta })$.