 this paper, [@BG] which concerns the symmetric square $L$-function on ${\operatorname{GL}}(r)$, it has an unfortunate history of numerous technical errors and as a result published literatures in this area are often marred by those errors which compromise their reliability. As is pointed out in [@BLS], this is probably due to the deep and subtle nature of the subject. At any rate, this has made people who work in the area particularly wary of inaccuracies in new works. For this reason, especially considering the foundational nature of this paper, we tried to provide detailed proofs for most of our assertions at the expense of the length of the paper. Furthermore, for large part, we rely only on the two fundamental works, namely the work on the metaplectic cocycle by Banks, Levy and Sepanski ([@BLS]) and the local metaplectic tensor product by Mezo ([@Mezo]), both of which are written carefully enough to be reliable.

Finally, let us mention that the result of this paper will be used in our forthcoming [@Takeda2], which will improve the main result of [@Takeda1].

[**Notations**]{}

Throughout the paper, $F$ is a local field of characteristic zero or a number field. If $F$ is a number field, we denote the ring of adeles by ${\mathbb{A}}$. As we did in the introduction we often use the notation $$R=\begin{cases} F\quad\text{if $F$ is local}\\
{\mathbb{A}}\quad\text{if $F$ is global}.
\end{cases}$$ The symbol $R^\times$ has the usual meaning and we set $$R^{\times n}=\{a^n: a\in R^\times\}.$$ Both locally and globally, we denote by ${\mathcal{O}_F}$ the ring of integers of $F$. For each algebraic group $G$ over a global $F$, and $g\in G({\mathbb{A}})$, by $g_v$ we mean the $v^{{{\text{th}}}}$ component of $g$, and so $g_v\in
G(F_v)$.

For a positive integer $r$, we denote by $I_r$ the $r\times r$ identity matrix. Throughout we fix an integer $n\geq 2$, and we let $\mu_n$ be the group of $n^{\text{th
this paper, [ @BG ] which concerns the symmetric square $ L$-function on $ { \operatorname{GL}}(r)$, it has an inauspicious history of numerous technical error and as a result published literature in this sphere are often marred by those errors which compromise their dependability. As is point out in [ @BLS ], this is probably ascribable to the cryptic and subtle nature of the national. At any rate, this has made citizenry who work in the area particularly wary of inaccuracies in fresh works. For this reason, especially consider the foundational nature of this paper, we tried to provide detailed proofs for most of our assertion at the expense of the length of the paper. Furthermore, for large part, we rely merely on the two fundamental works, namely the work on the metaplectic cocycle by Banks, Levy and Sepanski ([ @BLS ]) and the local metaplectic tensor product by Mezo ([ @Mezo ]), both of which are written carefully enough to be reliable. 

 Finally, let us mention that the result of this paper will be used in our forthcoming [ @Takeda2 ], which will improve the chief result of [ @Takeda1 ]. 

 [ * * Notations * * ] { } 

 Throughout the newspaper, $ F$ is a local sphere of characteristic zero or a number field. If $ F$ is a number discipline, we announce the ring of adeles by $ { \mathbb{A}}$. As we did in the introduction we frequently use the notation $ $ R=\begin{cases } F\quad\text{if $ F$ is local}\\ 
 { \mathbb{A}}\quad\text{if $ F$ is global }. 
 \end{cases}$$ The symbol $ R^\times$ has the usual meaning and we set $ $ R^{\times n}=\{a^n: a\in R^\times\}.$$ Both locally and globally, we denote by $ { \mathcal{O}_F}$ the ring of integers of $ F$. For each algebraic group $ G$ over a global $ F$, and $ g\in G({\mathbb{A}})$, by $ g_v$ we mean the $ v^{{{\text{th}}}}$ part of $ g$, and so $ g_v\in 
 G(F_v)$. 

 For a positivist integer $ r$, we announce by $ I_r$ the $ r\times r$ identity matrix. Throughout we sterilize an integer $ n\geq 2 $, and we let $ \mu_n$ be the group of $ n^{\text{th
 thls paper, [@BG] which concerks the symmetric square $L$-funcfion on ${\uperatorname{GL}}(r)$, it has an unhortynate history of numerous tdchnical vrrors ane as q result pnglished literzbures mn this area arg often marrad by those ersofs which compromise their reliability. As is lolnted out in [@BJS], tnys ia probably due to the deep and subfle natlre of the subjecy. At any rate, this has madf pelple who work in tje area parjjcujqrly wary of inaccuracpzs in new wkrks. For this reason, especially consndering the fiunfdtional natnre of this paper, we tried to profide detailed iroofv fir most of our assertmons at the expense jf the letgch of the paper. Furthwrnore, xor nargd paft, se rsly onpy kn the two fundamentao works, namely the eowj on the metallectis socycle by Banks, Levy and Sepanski ([@BLS]) dnd the local metaplectic rensor product by Mezl ([@Mezo]), boeh of which are written carefully enough to be reniablx.

Fknaoln, leg ud mention that the result of this paper will fs isvd in our forthcoiing [@Takeda2], wjivr will improvg the mcjn result of [@Takeda1].

[**Nltationf**]{}

Throyghout tht paprr, $F$ is a local field of chqracteristic zero or a number fneld. If $F$ is a nomber gield, we denote the riny of aseles by ${\mahhbb{A}}$. As sd did in the intfodlctimn we ofudn use the notatijn $$R=\begin{rases} F\quad\tdxt{ig $F$ is local}\\
{\mathhb{A}}\quad\text{if $F$ is globap}.
\end{ccses}$$ Dhe symbol $R^\times$ has the usual meaning aiv we set $$R^{\timgs t}=\{a^n: a\in R^\tiies\}.$$ Bpth locally agd globally, we denote by ${\mxthcal{O}_F}$ tge ring of integerf of $F$. For eawj algebraic jroup $G$ oder q glibal $F$, xvd $g\in G({\mathbb{S}})$, by $g_v$ wv iean the $v^{{{\text{th}}}}$ compokent ur $g$, and so $g_v\in
Y(Y_v)$.

Dor a positive ontdgew $g$, wx denjde by $I_r$ the $r\tioes t$ idevtity matriw. Tfroubhout we fix an intecer $h\geq 2$, and we let $\mi_n$ be the troup of $n^{\text{th
this paper, [@BG] which concerns the symmetric on it has unfortunate history of a published literatures in area are often by those errors which compromise their As is pointed out in [@BLS], this is probably due to the deep subtle nature of the subject. At any rate, this has made people who in area wary inaccuracies in new works. For this reason, especially considering the foundational nature of this paper, we to provide detailed proofs for most of our at the expense of length of the paper. Furthermore, large we rely on two works, namely the on the metaplectic cocycle by Banks, Levy and Sepanski ([@BLS]) and the local metaplectic tensor product by ([@Mezo]), both are written enough be Finally, let us the result of this paper will our forthcoming [@Takeda2], which will improve the main of [@Takeda1]. Throughout the paper, $F$ is a field of characteristic zero or a number field. $F$ is a number field, we denote the ring of adeles by ${\mathbb{A}}$. As we the introduction we often the notation $$R=\begin{cases} $F$ local}\\ $F$ global}. \end{cases}$$ symbol $R^\times$ has the usual meaning and we set $$R^{\times n}=\{a^n: R^\times\}.$$ Both locally and globally, we denote by ${\mathcal{O}_F}$ the integers $F$. For each group $G$ over a $F$, $g\in G({\mathbb{A}})$, by $g_v$ the component so G(F_v)$. a positive integer $r$, denote by $I_r$ the $r\times identity matrix. Throughout we and we let $\mu_n$ be the group of
 this paper, [@BG] which concerns tHe symmetriC squaRe $L$-FunCtIon oN ${\opeRatorname{GL}}(r)$, it HAs an Unfortunate history of nuMerouS tEChniCAl ErrorS and as a REsULT puBlIsHed LiTErAtureS in This areA are often mArrEd By those errorS WhIch compromIse Their reliabiLitY. As is pOiNteD Out in [@bLS], This iS probaBLy due tO the deep aNd SUbtle nATure of tHE SuBjecT. At any rate, this has MAdE People who work iN the arEa PArTICulArlY wary of inaCcUraciES in new wORkS. fOR thIS reason, especiAlly consideRIng The fouNdAtiONal natUre of ThIS paPer, we tried tO proVide detaiLed proOFs for moST of our aSsertiOns At tHe exPEnSe Of tHe LEngTH oF thE PapEr. FurtheRmOrE, for lArge PART, We reLy oNly oN the tWo fundamental WorKs, naMEly The woRk on tHe meTaPlectIc cocyCle by baNks, Levy and SepanSki ([@BlS]) and the lOcaL mEtaPlEctic TEnsor pRodUct By Mezo ([@MEzo]), both OF whIcH ARE wRitten carefully enoUgH TO bE reliablE.

FinalLY, lEt US mention ThAt tHe reSULt of tHis pAPeR will be uSed in oUR fOrThcominG [@TAkeda2], wHiCh wIll ImproVE the Main reSult of [@TaKeda1].

[**NOTations**]{}

ThroughOUt the paper, $F$ is A LoCAL fIEld oF chAracteristiC zerO Or a nUmbeR FiEld. iF $F$ is a NumbeR fIElD, We denote the ring of adElEs by ${\maThbb{A}}$. as we did in the iNtroductioN WE Often use The nOTaTIon $$R=\begin{cases} f\quad\Text{if $F$ is lOCal}\\
{\mathbB{A}}\quaD\text{if $F$ Is global}.
\eND{Cases}$$ The SymBol $r^\tiMes$ HAS tHe usual meaninG ANd we SeT $$R^{\times N}=\{a^n: A\in R^\timEs\}.$$ BOth LocAllY aNd globallY, we denotE bY ${\mAtHcAl{O}_f}$ the rINg of inteGeRs oF $F$. for Each aLGebraiC grouP $G$ ovEr A gLObaL $F$, and $g\iN g({\mATHbb{A}})$, By $G_v$ We meAn tHe $V^{{{\text{Th}}}}$ coMPonEnt of $g$, aNd so $g_v\in
G(f_v)$.

FOR a poSiTiVe integEr $r$, we denote by $i_r$ The $r\times r$ IdEntIty matRIX. ThroughOut we fix an integer $n\geq 2$, anD We let $\mu_N$ be The grOup oF $n^{\text{th
 this paper, [@BG] which c oncerns th e sym met ric  s quar e $L $-function on$ {\op eratorname{GL}}(r)$, i t has  a n  unf o rt unate  histor y  o f num er ou s t ec h ni cal e rro rs andas a resul t p ub lished liter a tu res in thi s a rea are ofte n m arredby  th o se er ror s whi ch com p romise  their re li a bility .  As isp o in tedout in [@BLS], th i si s probably due  to th ed ee p and  su btle natur eof th e  subjec t .A t any rate, this ha s made peop l e w ho wor kint he are a par ti c ula rly wary of  ina ccuracies  in ne w  works. For thi s reas on,  es peci a ll ycon si d eri n gthe fou ndationa lna tureof t h i s pape r,we t riedto provide de tai ledp roo fs fo r mos t of  o ur as sertio ns at  t he expense of t he l ength ofthe  p ape r.  Furt h ermore , f orlarge p art, we rel yo n l yon the two fundame nt a l  w orks, na mely t h ewo r k on the  m eta plec t i c coc ycle by  Banks,Levy a n dSe panski([ @BLS])  a ndthe  loca l  met aplect ic tenso r pro d uct by Mezo ([ @ Mezo]), botho fw h ic h  are  wr itten caref ully enou gh t o  b e r e liabl e.

F in a ll y , let us mention th at  the r esult  of this pape r will beu s e d in our  for t hc o ming [@Takeda2 ], wh ich will i m prove th e mai n result  of [@Tak e d a1].

[* *No tat ion s** ] { }
Throughout t h e  pap er , $F$ i s a  localfie ldofcha ra cteristic  zero or  a  n um be r f ield. If $F$ i sa n um ber  fiel d , we d enote  the  r in g  of  adeles by $ {\ma th bb {A}} $.As  we d id i n  th e intro duction w e o f tenus ethe not ation $$R=\be gi n{cases} F \q uad \text{ i f  $F$ islocal}\\
{\mathbb{A}}\q u ad\text {if  $F$is g lobal}.
\ end {cases }$$ The sy mbol $ R^\ti me s$h a s the u su alme aning andw e  se t $$R ^{ \tim es n}=\ {a^n: a\in R^\time s \}. $$ Both local lyandg l ob all y ,w e d en o teb y  ${\mathcal{O}_ F}$ the ri ng of  integerso f $ F$ . For e ach alg ebrai c  group$G$ overa global$F $, a n d  $g \in G({\ma thbb{A}} )$, by $g _ v$ we me an th e $ v^{{{\ te xt{ th}}} }$ com p one nt of  $g$,an d so $ g_v\i nG(F_v)$. 

For a positive intege r $r$,  we d eno te by $I_ r$t he$r\timesr$ i dentity ma tri x.Throu gho u t wefixa nint e ger $ n\ge q  2$, andw elet $ \m u_n$ be the g r oup  of $ n^{ \ text{t h
 this_paper, [@BG]_which concerns the symmetric_square $L$-function_on_${\operatorname{GL}}(r)$, it_has_an unfortunate history_of numerous technical_errors and as a_result published literatures_in_this area are often marred by those errors which compromise their reliability. As is_pointed_out in_[@BLS],_this_is probably due to the_deep and subtle nature of_the subject._At any rate, this has made people who_work_in the area_particularly wary of inaccuracies in new works. For this_reason, especially considering the foundational nature_of this paper,_we_tried_to provide detailed proofs_for most of our assertions at_the expense of the length of_the paper. Furthermore, for large part, we_rely only on the two fundamental_works, namely the work on_the metaplectic_cocycle by Banks, Levy and_Sepanski ([@BLS]) and_the local_metaplectic tensor product_by Mezo ([@Mezo]), both of which_are written carefully_enough to be reliable.

Finally, let us_mention_that the result_of_this_paper will_be used in_our_forthcoming [@Takeda2],_which_will improve the main result of_[@Takeda1].

[**Notations**]{}

Throughout_the paper, $F$ is a local field_of characteristic zero or_a_number field. If $F$_is a number field, we_denote the ring of adeles by_${\mathbb{A}}$. As_we did_in the introduction we often use the notation $$R=\begin{cases} F\quad\text{if $F$_is local}\\
{\mathbb{A}}\quad\text{if $F$ is global}.
\end{cases}$$ The_symbol $R^\times$ has the_usual meaning_and_we set $$R^{\times_n}=\{a^n:_a\in R^\times\}.$$_Both locally and globally, we denote by_${\mathcal{O}_F}$ the_ring of integers of $F$. For_each algebraic group $G$_over_a global $F$, and $g\in G({\mathbb{A}})$,_by $g_v$ we mean the $v^{{{\text{th}}}}$_component of $g$, and so_$g_v\in
G(F_v)$.

For_a_positive integer $r$, we denote_by $I_r$ the $r\times r$ identity_matrix. Throughout we_fix an integer $n\geq 2$, and we_let_$\mu_n$ be the group of $n^{\text{th