left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right
)^{2s-6},$$ $$a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BB}$$ $$=\frac{r_e^2n_e}{64m\gamma^3\nu_1^2\theta^2}
\left (\frac{\nu_1\eta_1}{\omega_H/2\pi\gamma}\right
)\frac{(4+2s)s^{2s+1}}{(s!)^2}\left
(\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right )^{2s-6}.$$ One can see that $a_s^{AA}/a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/a_s^{BB}\sim
(\omega_H/2\pi\gamma\nu_1\eta_1)^2\gg 1$, i.e. the scattering into the state with A-polarization is much more intense. Hence, the scattered component should be dominated by A-polarization, similarly to the scattering between the frequencies below the resonance (see Sect. 3.1). However, in contrast to that case, the initial intensities in the two polarizations are affected identically.

The general forms of the systems (13) and (19) differ by the presence of the factor $\alpha$ in the latter one. Taking notice that the substitution $\widetilde{I}_{\nu_1}=\alpha I_{\nu_1}$ makes equation (19) similar to equation (13), we immediately write the first integral, $$I\equiv I_\nu +\alpha I_{\nu_1}={\rm const},$$ and the solution $$I_\nu=\frac{I/y}{1+1/y},\quad I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1+1/y},$$ where $y\equiv[\alpha I_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\exp (\Gamma_s)$ and $\Gamma_s\equiv Ia_sr$. One can see that the intensity transfer becomes significant at $y\ga 1$. Although the qualitative character of the solution (22) is the same as that in case of the scattering below the resonance, the quantitative difference is substantial. The maximum possible intensity of the scattered component appears much less, $I_{\nu_1}\sim I_\nu^{(0)}/\alpha\ll
I_\nu^{(0)}$, the rest of the energy being deposited to
left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right 
) ^{2s-6},$$ $ $ a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BB}$$ $ $ = \frac{r_e^2n_e}{64m\gamma^3\nu_1 ^ 2\theta^2 } 
 \left (\frac{\nu_1\eta_1}{\omega_H/2\pi\gamma}\right 
) \frac{(4 + 2s)s^{2s+1}}{(s!)^2}\left 
 (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right) ^{2s-6}.$$ One can see that $ a_s^{AA}/a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/a_s^{BB}\sim 
 (\omega_H/2\pi\gamma\nu_1\eta_1)^2\gg 1 $, i.e. the scattering into the state with deoxyadenosine monophosphate - polarization is a lot more intense. Hence, the confused component should be overshadow by A - polarization, similarly to the scatter between the frequency below the resonance (see Sect. 3.1). However, in contrast to that case, the initial saturation in the two polarizations are affected identically. 

 The cosmopolitan forms of the systems (13) and (19) differ by the presence of the factor $ \alpha$ in the latter one. Taking notice that the substitution $ \widetilde{I}_{\nu_1}=\alpha I_{\nu_1}$ make equation (19) similar to equation (13), we immediately spell the first integral, $ $ I\equiv I_\nu + \alpha I_{\nu_1}={\rm const},$$ and the solution $ $ I_\nu=\frac{I / y}{1 + 1 / y},\quad I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1 + 1 / y},$$ where $ y\equiv[\alpha I_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\exp (\Gamma_s)$ and $ \Gamma_s\equiv Ia_sr$. One can see that the volume transfer becomes significant at $ y\ga 1$. Although the qualitative character of the solution (22) is the same as that in shell of the scattering below the resonance, the quantitative difference is substantial. The maximum possible intensity of the scattered component appears much less, $ I_{\nu_1}\sim I_\nu^{(0)}/\alpha\ll 
 I_\nu^{(0)}$, the rest of the energy being deposited to
lefh (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\rigmt
)^{2s-6},$$ $$a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BB}$$ $$=\frae{e_e^2n_e}{64m\gemma^3\nu_1^2\tgeta^2}
\left (\frac{\nu_1\eta_1}{\omega_H/2\pi\gamma}\right
)\hrac{(4+2w)s^{2s+1}}{(s!)^2}\ltyt
(\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\thetx}\right )^{2s-6}.$$ Lne can wee uhat $a_s^{AA}/a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/e_a^{BB}\sim
(\omega_H/2\pj\namma\uu_1\xta_1)^2\gg 1$, i.e. the sgattering itto the state figh A-polarization is much more intense. Hence, yhf scattered coipontnt shohld be dominated by A-polarization, aimilarny to the scaytering between the frequejcied below the resonajce (see Secj. 3.1). Hjqever, in congrast to that case, the initial intensities in the two polaxizations atz afvgcted identirally.

Tre general forms of dhe sysyems (13) and (19) difner bb thw presence of the facvor $\alpha$ in the latjer one. Taniug notice that the suvsrituthon $\fideguldd{I}_{\nh_1}=\akpga I_{\nu_1}$ maies equatikn (19) similar to equation (13), we imkeqpstely write fhe fiwse integral, $$I\equiv I_\nu +\alpha I_{\nu_1}={\rm const},$$ ans the solution $$I_\nu=\frac{I/t}{1+1/y},\quad I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1+1/y},$$ where $y\ezuiv[\alpha I_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\exp (\Gamma_s)$ and $\Gamma_s\equiv Ia_sr$. Ote cai ree tmat gye intensity transfer becomes significant at $y\gw 1$. Slnhough the qualitctive character pf tng solution (22) is the scje as that in case ov the ssatteeing belor thr resonance, the quantitativw difference us substantial. The maximum porsibke inyensity of the scattereb compknent appeags much lsrs, $I_{\nu_1}\sim I_\nu^{(0)}/\alpfa\lk
I_\tu^{(0)}$, the rtrt of the energy feing depisitzd to
left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right )^{2s-6},$$ $$a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BB}$$ $$=\frac{r_e^2n_e}{64m\gamma^3\nu_1^2\theta^2} \left (\frac{\nu_1\eta_1}{\omega_H/2\pi\gamma}\right )^{2s-6}.$$ can see $a_s^{AA}/a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/a_s^{BB}\sim (\omega_H/2\pi\gamma\nu_1\eta_1)^2\gg 1$, state A-polarization is much intense. Hence, the component should be dominated by A-polarization, to the scattering between the frequencies below the resonance (see Sect. 3.1). However, contrast to that case, the initial intensities in the two polarizations are affected The forms the (13) and (19) differ by the presence of the factor $\alpha$ in the latter one. Taking that the substitution $\widetilde{I}_{\nu_1}=\alpha I_{\nu_1}$ makes equation (19) to equation (13), we write the first integral, $$I\equiv +\alpha const},$$ and solution I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1+1/y},$$ $y\equiv[\alpha I_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\exp (\Gamma_s)$ $\Gamma_s\equiv Ia_sr$. One can see that the intensity transfer becomes significant at $y\ga 1$. Although the qualitative of the is the as in of the scattering resonance, the quantitative difference is substantial. intensity of the scattered component appears much less, I_\nu^{(0)}/\alpha\ll I_\nu^{(0)}$, rest of the energy being deposited
left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\riGht
)^{2s-6},$$ $$a_s^{AB}=a_s^{bB}$$ $$=\fraC{r_e^2N_e}{64m\GaMma^3\nU_1^2\theTa^2}
\left (\frac{\nu_1\etA_1}{\OmegA_H/2\pi\gamma}\right
)\frac{(4+2s)s^{2s+1}}{(s!)^2}\Left
(\fRaC{\GammA_0}{\GaMma\thEta}\righT )^{2S-6}.$$ ONE Can SeE tHat $A_s^{aa}/a_S^{AB}=a_s^{bA}/a_S^{BB}\sim
(\oMega_H/2\pi\gamMa\nU_1\eTa_1)^2\gg 1$, i.e. the scaTTeRing into thE stAte with A-polaRizAtion iS mUch MOre inTenSe. HenCe, the sCAttereD componenT sHOuld be DOminateD BY A-PolaRization, similarly TO tHE scattering betWeen thE fREqUENciEs bElow the resOnAnce (sEE Sect. 3.1). HoWEvER, IN coNTrast to that caSe, the initiaL IntEnsitiEs In tHE two poLarizAtIOns Are affected IdenTically.

ThE generAL forms oF The systEms (13) and (19) DifFer By thE PrEsEncE oF The FAcTor $\ALphA$ in the laTtEr One. TaKing NOTICe thAt tHe suBstitUtion $\widetildE{I}_{\nU_1}=\alpHA I_{\nU_1}$ makeS equaTion (19) SiMilar To equaTion (13), wE iMmediately write The fIrst integRal, $$i\eQuiV I_\Nu +\alpHA I_{\nu_1}={\rm ConSt},$$ aNd the soLution $$I_\NU=\frAc{i/Y}{1+1/Y},\QuAd I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1+1/y},$$ whErE $Y\EqUiv[\alpha i_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\EXp (\gaMMa_s)$ and $\GaMmA_s\eQuiv iA_Sr$. One Can sEE tHat the inTensitY TrAnSfer becOmEs signIfIcaNt aT $y\ga 1$. ALThouGh the qUalitatiVe chaRActer of the soluTIon (22) is the same aS ThAT In CAse oF thE scattering BeloW The rEsonANcE, thE QuantItatiVe DIfFErence is substantial. thE maximUm posSible intensitY of the scatTEREd componEnt aPPeARs much less, $I_{\nu_1}\sIm I_\nu^{(0)}/\Alpha\ll
I_\nu^{(0)}$, THe rest of The enErgy beinG depositeD TO
left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gam ma\theta}\ right 
)^ {2s -6 },$$  $$a _s^{AB}=a_s^{B B }$$$$=\frac{r_e^2n_e}{64m \gamm a^ 3 \nu_ 1 ^2 \thet a^2}
\l e ft ( \fr ac {\ nu_ 1\ e ta _1}{\ ome ga_H/2\ pi\gamma}\ rig ht 
)\frac{(4+2 s )s ^{2s+1}}{( s!) ^2}\left
(\f rac {\gamm a_ 0}{ \ gamma \th eta}\ right) ^{2s-6 }.$$ Oneca n  see t h at $a_s ^ { AA }/a_ s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/a _ s^ { BB}\sim
(\omeg a_H/2\ pi \ ga m m a\n u_1 \eta_1)^2\ gg  1$,i .e. the sc a t t eri n g into the st ate with A- p ola rizati on  is much m ore i nt e nse . Hence, th e sc attered c ompone n t shoul d  be dom inated  by  A- pola r iz at ion ,s imi l ar lyt o t he scatt er in g bet ween t h e  fre que ncie s bel ow the resona nce  (se e  Se ct. 3 .1).Howe ve r, in  contr ast t othat case, theinit ial inten sit ie s i nthe t w o pola riz ati ons are  affect e d i de n t i ca lly.

The generalfo r m sof the s ystems (1 3) and (19)  d iff er b y the p rese n ce  of thefactor $\ al pha$ in  t he lat te r o ne.  Taki n g no tice t hat thesubst i tution $\widet i lde{I}_{\nu_1 } =\ a l ph a  I_{ \nu _1}$ makesequa t ion(19) si mil a r toequat io n  ( 1 3), we immediatelywr ite th e fir st integral,$$I\equivI _ \ nu +\alp ha I _ {\ n u_1}={\rm cons t},$$  and the s o lution $ $I_\n u=\frac{ I/y}{1+1/ y } ,\quad I _{\ nu_ 1}= \fr a c {I /\alpha}{1+1/ y } ,$$wh ere $y\ equ iv[\alp haI_{ \nu _1} ^{ (0)}/I_\n u^{(0)}] \e xp  ( \G amm a_s)$ and $\Ga mm a_s \e qui v Ia_ s r$. On e can  see  t ha t  th e inten s it y tran sf er  bec ome ssigni fica n t a t $y\ga  1$. Alth oug h  the  q ua litativ e character o fthe soluti on  (2 2) ist h e same a s that in case of the s c atterin g b elowtheresonance , t he qua nti t ativediffer enceis  su b s tanti a l .The  m aximum pos s i ble  inte ns ityof thescattered componen t  ap pears much le ss,  $I_ { \ nu _1} \ si m  I_ \n u ^{( 0 ) }/\alpha\ll
I_\ nu^{(0)}$,  t h erest of th e  en er gy bein g depos itedt o
left (\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right
)^{2s-6},$$_$$a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BB}$$ $$=\frac{r_e^2n_e}{64m\gamma^3\nu_1^2\theta^2}
\left_(\frac{\nu_1\eta_1}{\omega_H/2\pi\gamma}\right
)\frac{(4+2s)s^{2s+1}}{(s!)^2}\left
(\frac{\gamma_0}{\gamma\theta}\right )^{2s-6}.$$ One can_see that_$a_s^{AA}/a_s^{AB}=a_s^{BA}/a_s^{BB}\sim
(\omega_H/2\pi\gamma\nu_1\eta_1)^2\gg_1$, i.e._the_scattering into the_state with A-polarization_is much more intense._Hence, the scattered_component_should be dominated by A-polarization, similarly to the scattering between the frequencies below the_resonance_(see Sect._3.1)._However,_in contrast to that case,_the initial intensities in the_two polarizations_are affected identically.

The general forms of the systems_(13)_and (19) differ_by the presence of the factor $\alpha$ in the_latter one. Taking notice that the_substitution $\widetilde{I}_{\nu_1}=\alpha I_{\nu_1}$_makes_equation_(19) similar to equation_(13), we immediately write the first_integral, $$I\equiv I_\nu +\alpha I_{\nu_1}={\rm const},$$_and the solution $$I_\nu=\frac{I/y}{1+1/y},\quad I_{\nu_1}=\frac{I/\alpha}{1+1/y},$$ where $y\equiv[\alpha_I_{\nu_1}^{(0)}/I_\nu^{(0)}]\exp (\Gamma_s)$ and $\Gamma_s\equiv Ia_sr$. One_can see that the intensity_transfer becomes_significant at $y\ga 1$. Although_the qualitative character_of the_solution (22) is_the same as that in case_of the scattering_below the resonance, the quantitative difference_is_substantial. The maximum_possible_intensity_of the_scattered component appears_much_less, $I_{\nu_1}\sim_I_\nu^{(0)}/\alpha\ll
I_\nu^{(0)}$,_the rest of the energy being_deposited_to