big)(E)
+\int_{I'}(\hat {{{\mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omega,E',E) dE',
\label{co-bb}\end{gathered}$$ where ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m$, $m=1,2$, are the [*Hadamard finite part operators*]{} with respect to $E'$-variable defined by $$({{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m u)(E):={\mathrm{p.f.}}\int_{E}^{E_m}{1\over{(E'-E)^m}}u(E')dE'.$$ The expression is the hyper-singular integral form of $K$.

We shall verify that can be equivalently given in the “pseudo-differential form” by \[co-cc\] ([K]{})(x,,E) =& ( [H]{}\_1((\_2)(x,,,E))(E)) - [H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\
& +( (\_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\
& + [H]{}\_1((\_1)(x,,,E))(E) +\_[I’]{}(\_0)(x,,E’,E) dE’ where only ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ appears. This formulation reveals the nature of charged particles’ collisions and it enables among others to retrieve existence results of solutions. Note that ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ is well-defined (at least) for all $u\in C^\alpha(I),\ \alpha>0$ and (cf. [@chan]) \[c-0-a\] ([H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[u(E’)-u(E)]{}]{}dE’+ u(E)([E\_m-E]{}). Moreover, it can perhaps be shown that ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ is a zeroth-order pseudo-differential operator (cf. [@hsiao Chapter 7]).

As a conclusion we find that some interactions produce the first-order partial derivatives with respect to energy $E$ combined with the “zeroth-order” Hadamard part operator. A closer analysis of the operators $\ol{{{\mathcal{}}}K}_j$ reveals that in addition, partial derivatives with respect to $\omega$ may appear. We shall demonstrate that below for $n=
big)(E) 
 + \int_{I'}(\hat { { { \mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omega, E',E) dE', 
 \label{co - bb}\end{gathered}$$ where $ { { { \mathcal{}}}H}_m$, $ m=1,2 $, are the [ * Hadamard finite part operators * ] { } with respect to $ E'$-variable defined by $ $ ({ { { \mathcal{}}}H}_m u)(E):={\mathrm{p.f.}}\int_{E}^{E_m}{1\over{(E'-E)^m}}u(E')dE'.$$ The formula is the hyper - remarkable integral form of $ K$. 

 We shall verify that can be equivalently yield in the “ pseudo - differential form ” by \[co - cc\ ] ([ K]{})(x,,E) = & ([ H]{}\_1((\_2)(x,,,E))(E) ) - [ H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\ 
 & + (( \_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\ 
 & + [ H]{}\_1((\_1)(x,,,E))(E) + \_[I’]{}(\_0)(x,,E’,E) dE ’ where only $ { { { \mathcal{}}}H}_1 $ appear. This conceptualization reveals the nature of charged particles ’ collisions and it enables among others to remember existence results of solution. Note that $ { { { \mathcal{}}}H}_1 $ is well - defined (at least) for all $ u\in C^\alpha(I),\ \alpha>0 $ and (cf. [ @chan ]) \[c-0 - a\ ] ([ H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[u(E’)-u(E)]{}]{}dE’+ u(E)([E\_m - E ] { }). Moreover, it can perhaps be read that $ { { { \mathcal{}}}H}_1 $ is a zeroth - order pseudo - differential operator (cf. [ @hsiao Chapter 7 ]). 

 As a termination we find that some interactions produce the first - ordering partial derivatives with respect to energy $ E$ combined with the “ zeroth - orderliness ” Hadamard part operator. A closer analysis of the operators $ \ol{{{\mathcal{}}}K}_j$ reveal that in addition, partial derivatives with respect to $ \omega$ may appear. We shall demonstrate that below for $ n=
big)(F)
+\int_{I'}(\hat {{{\mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omena,E',E) dE',
\label{co-bb}\gne{gatheced}$$ whede ${{{\mathcxl{}}}H}_m$, $m=1,2$, are the [*Hadamard finive pqrt okvrators*]{} with respect go $E'$-variahle defibed uy $$({{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m u)(E):={\mefhrm{p.f.}}\ikc_{E}^{E_m}{1\obcr{(E'-E)^m}}b(E')vE'.$$ The expressipn is the vyper-singular hngeyral form of $K$.

We shall verify that cwn be eaulvalently giveg in ehe “lseudo-differential form” by \[co-cc\] ([K]{})(x,,S) =& ( [H]{}\_1((\_2)(x,,,E))(T)) - [H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\
& +( (\_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\
& + [H]{}\_1((\_1)(c,,,E))(E) +\_[I’]{}(\_0)(x,,E’,E) dE’ where only ${{{\matjcal{}}}J}_1$ appears. This forlulation recealf the nature uf charged particles’ ckllisions and it enables among utherx to retrigrw edhstence resnlts os solutions. Kpte thdt ${{{\mathval{}}}H}_1$ is well-denined (at least) for all $u\in C^\anpha(I),\ \alpha>0$ and (cf. [@chan]) \[c-0-a\] ([V]{}\_1u)(Z)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[u(E’)-u(E)]{}]{}dE’+ u(E)([E\_m-E]{}). Moreivwr, it can perfqps be siowh that ${{{\mavhcal{}}}H}_1$ is a zeroth-ordee pseudo-differentiak jirrator (cf. [@hsjao Chwpeer 7]).

As a conclusion we find that some ittedactions produce the fiest-order partial derigatives wyth respect to energy $E$ combined with the “zeroth-osder” Iaaamcvq pagt operator. A closer analysis of the operatorf $\ok{{{\msthcal{}}}K}_j$ reveajs that in sdfiyyon, partial dgrivatirss with respect to $\olega$ mai appeqr. We shajl drmonstrate that below for $n=
big)(E) +\int_{I'}(\hat {{{\mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omega,E',E) dE', \label{co-bb}\end{gathered}$$ where ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m$, the finite part with respect to The is the hyper-singular form of $K$. shall verify that can be equivalently in the “pseudo-differential form” by \[co-cc\] ([K]{})(x,,E) =& ( [H]{}\_1((\_2)(x,,,E))(E)) - [H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\ & (\_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\ & + [H]{}\_1((\_1)(x,,,E))(E) +\_[I’]{}(\_0)(x,,E’,E) dE’ where only ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ appears. This formulation reveals nature charged collisions it enables among others to retrieve existence results of solutions. Note that ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ is well-defined (at for all $u\in C^\alpha(I),\ \alpha>0$ and (cf. [@chan]) ([H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[u(E’)-u(E)]{}]{}dE’+ u(E)([E\_m-E]{}). Moreover, it perhaps be shown that ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ a pseudo-differential operator [@hsiao 7]). a conclusion we that some interactions produce the first-order partial derivatives with respect to energy $E$ combined with the “zeroth-order” part operator. analysis of operators reveals in addition, partial respect to $\omega$ may appear. We below for $n=
big)(E)
+\int_{I'}(\hat {{{\mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omEga,E',E) dE',
\labEl{co-bB}\enD{gaThEred}$$ WherE ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m$, $m=1,2$, are THe [*HaDamard finite part operatOrs*]{} wiTh REspeCT tO $E'$-varIable deFInED By $$({{{\mAtHcAl{}}}H}_M u)(e):={\MaThrm{p.F.}}\inT_{E}^{E_m}{1\oveR{(E'-E)^m}}u(E')dE'.$$ ThE exPrEssion is the hYPeR-singular iNteGral form of $K$.

WE shAll verIfY thAT can bE eqUivalEntly gIVen in tHe “pseudo-dIfFErentiAL form” by \[CO-Cc\] ([k]{})(x,,E) =& ( [H]{}\_1((\_2)(X,,,E))(E)) - [H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\
& +( (\_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\
& + [H]{}\_1((\_1)(x,,,E))(E) +\_[i’]{}(\_0)(X,,E’,e) DE’ where only ${{{\matHcal{}}}H}_1$ aPpEArS. tHis ForMulation reVeAls thE Nature oF ChARGEd pARticles’ collisIons and it enABleS among OtHerS To retrIeve eXiSTenCe results of SoluTions. Note That ${{{\maTHcal{}}}H}_1$ is WEll-defiNed (at lEasT) foR all $U\In c^\aLphA(I),\ \ALphA>0$ AnD (cf. [@CHan]) \[C-0-a\] ([H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[U(E’)-U(E)]{}]{}DE’+ u(E)([E\_M-E]{}). MoREOVEr, it Can PerhAps be Shown that ${{{\mathCal{}}}h}_1$ is a ZEroTh-ordEr pseUdo-dIfFerenTial opEratoR (cF. [@hsiao Chapter 7]).

As A conClusion we FinD tHat SoMe intERactioNs pRodUce the fIrst-ordER paRtIAL DeRivatives with respeCt TO EnErgy $E$ comBined wITh ThE “Zeroth-orDeR” HaDamaRD Part oPeraTOr. a closer aNalysiS Of ThE operatOrS $\ol{{{\matHcAl{}}}K}_J$ reVeals THat iN additIon, partiAl derIVatives with resPEct to $\omega$ may APpEAR. WE ShalL deMonstrate thAt beLOw foR $n=
big)(E)
+\int_{I'}(\hat {{ {\mathcal{ }}}K} _0\ psi )( x,\o mega ,E',E) dE',
\l a bel{ co-bb}\end{gathered}$$  wher e$ {{{\ m at hcal{ }}}H}_m $ ,$ m =1, 2$ ,are  t h e[*Had ama rd fini te part op era to rs*]{} withr es pect to $E '$- variable def ine d by $ $( {{{ \ mathc al{ }}}H} _m u)( E ):={\m athrm{p.f .} } \int_{ E }^{E_m} { 1 \o ver{ (E'-E)^m}}u(E')dE ' .$ $  The expressio n is t he hy p e r-s ing ular integ ra l for m  of $K$ . 
W e sha l l verify that  can be equ i val entlygi ven in the  “pse ud o -di fferentialform ” by \[co -cc\]( [K]{})( x ,,E) =&  ( [H] {}\ _1( (\_2 ) (x ,, ,E) )( E ))-  [ H]{ } \_1 (([E]{}( x, ,, E))(E )\
& + ( (\_2 )(x ,,E’ ,E))\ _[|E’=E]{}\
&  +[H]{ } \_1 ((\_1 )(x,, ,E)) (E ) +\_ [I’]{} (\_0) (x ,,E’,E) dE’ whe re o nly ${{{\ mat hc al{ }} }H}_1 $  appea rs.  Th is form ulation rev ea l s th e nature of charge dp a rt icles’ c ollisi o ns  a n d it ena bl esamon g other s to re trieve e xisten c ere sults o fsoluti on s.Not e tha t  ${{ {\math cal{}}}H }_1$i s well-defined (at least) fo r  a l l  $ u \inC^\ alpha(I),\\alp h a>0$  and (c f.[ @chan ]) \[ c- 0 -a \ ] ([H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_ [E ]{}\^[ E\_m] {}[[u(E’)-u(E )]{}]{}dE’ + u (E)([E\_ m-E] { }) .  Moreover, itcan p erhaps bes hown tha t ${{ {\mathca l{}}}H}_1 $ is a zer oth -or der  ps e u do -differential o pera to r (cf.[@h siao Ch apt er7]) .
As  a conclu sion wefi nd  t ha t s ome i n teractio ns  pr od uce  thef irst-o rderpart ia ld eri vatives wi t h  res pe ct  toene rg y $E$  com b ine d withthe “zero th- o rder ”Ha damardpart operator .A closer a na lys is oft h e operat ors $\ol{{{\mathcal{}}} K }_j$ re vea ls th at i n additio n,partia l d e rivati ves wi th re sp ect t o $\o m e ga $ m ay  appear. W e sha ll de mo nstr ate tha t below for $n=
big)(E)
+\int_{I'}(\hat {{{\mathcal{}}}K}_0\psi)(x,\omega,E',E)_dE',
\label{co-bb}\end{gathered}$$ where_${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m$, $m=1,2$, are the_[*Hadamard finite_part_operators*]{} with_respect_to $E'$-variable defined_by $$({{{\mathcal{}}}H}_m u)(E):={\mathrm{p.f.}}\int_{E}^{E_m}{1\over{(E'-E)^m}}u(E')dE'.$$_The expression is the_hyper-singular integral form_of_$K$.

We shall verify that can be equivalently given in the “pseudo-differential form” by \[co-cc\]_([K]{})(x,,E)_=& (_[H]{}\_1((\_2)(x,,,E))(E))_-_[H]{}\_1(([E]{}(x,,,E))(E)\
& +( (\_2)(x,,E’,E))\_[|E’=E]{}\
& + [H]{}\_1((\_1)(x,,,E))(E)_+\_[I’]{}(\_0)(x,,E’,E) dE’ where only ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$_appears. This_formulation reveals the nature of charged particles’ collisions_and_it enables among_others to retrieve existence results of solutions. Note that_${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ is well-defined (at least) for_all $u\in C^\alpha(I),\_\alpha>0$_and_(cf. [@chan]) \[c-0-a\] ([H]{}\_1u)(E)=\_[E]{}\^[E\_m]{}[[u(E’)-u(E)]{}]{}dE’+_u(E)([E\_m-E]{}). Moreover, it can perhaps be_shown that ${{{\mathcal{}}}H}_1$ is a zeroth-order_pseudo-differential operator (cf. [@hsiao Chapter 7]).

As a_conclusion we find that some interactions_produce the first-order partial derivatives_with respect_to energy $E$ combined with_the “zeroth-order” Hadamard_part operator._A closer analysis_of the operators $\ol{{{\mathcal{}}}K}_j$ reveals that_in addition, partial_derivatives with respect to $\omega$ may_appear._We shall demonstrate_that_below_for $n=