)\geq s.$$ Since $s<\delta_{\alpha}$ was arbitrary,and $\mu\left(C\right)=\mu\left(C\setminus\mathcal{D}\right)$ the desired lower bound is established.

\[rem:Multifractal\_Alternative\_Proof\] Let $\mu_{\alpha}:=\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. Since $\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}(\psi_{\alpha})=0$, Lemma \[lem:nodrift implies recurrence\] implies that $\mu_{\alpha}\left(\mathbf{E}(\alpha)\right)=1$. By Young’s formula we have $\dim_{H}(\mu_{\alpha})=\delta_{\alpha}$, which then gives an alternative proof for the lower bound of the Hausdorff dimension of $\mathbf{E}\left(\alpha\right)$.

\[Proof of Theorem \[thm:Bishop and Jones\]\] First suppose that $0\in\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$. Then this corollary is a special case of Theorem \[thm: Multifractal Decomposition\] with $\alpha=0$ by noting that $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)$ and $\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)$. If $0\notin\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$, then $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)={\varnothing}$ and $\delta_{0}=0$.

\[Proof of Theorem \[thm:-Transient-sets\]\]We only consider the first case, the second case follows in exactly the same manner. For this we assume $\alpha=\mu_{\delta\varphi}\left(\psi\right)\ge0$. Since $\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\subset\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+}\subset\mathbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for all $\alpha'>0$, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\delta & =\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha\right)\right)=\sup_{\alpha'>\alpha}\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\right)\leq\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+
) \geq s.$$ Since $ s<\delta_{\alpha}$ was arbitrary, and $ \mu\left(C\right)=\mu\left(C\setminus\mathcal{D}\right)$ the desired lower bound is established. 

 \[rem: Multifractal\_Alternative\_Proof\ ] Let $ \mu_{\alpha}:=\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. Since $ \mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}(\psi_{\alpha})=0 $, Lemma \[lem: nodrift entail recurrence\ ] entail that $ \mu_{\alpha}\left(\mathbf{E}(\alpha)\right)=1$. By Young ’s formula we have $ \dim_{H}(\mu_{\alpha})=\delta_{\alpha}$, which then gives an alternate proof for the lower bound of the Hausdorff property of $ \mathbf{E}\left(\alpha\right)$. 

 \[Proof of Theorem \[thm: Bishop and Jones\]\ ] First suppose that $ 0\in\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$. Then this corollary is a particular case of Theorem \[thm: Multifractal Decomposition\ ] with $ \alpha=0 $ by noting that $ \mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)$ and $ \mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)$. If $ 0\notin\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$, then $ \mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)={\varnothing}$ and $ \delta_{0}=0$. 

 \[Proof of Theorem \[thm:-Transient - sets\]\]We entirely consider the first sheath, the second shell follows in exactly the same manner. For this we assume $ \alpha=\mu_{\delta\varphi}\left(\psi\right)\ge0$. Since $ \mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\subset\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+}\subset\mathbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for all $ \alpha'>0 $, we obtain $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \delta & = \dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha\right)\right)=\sup_{\alpha'>\alpha}\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\right)\leq\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+
)\geq s.$$ Since $s<\delta_{\alpha}$ was arbitrary,and $\mo\lwft(C\rijht)=\mu\lert(C\setmivus\mathcal{D}\right)$ the desired liwer vound is established.

\[reo:Multifrabtal\_Alterbatite\_Proof\] Let $\mu_{\al'ga}:=\mu_{\delbc_{\alphz}\yarphn+q\'si_{\alpha}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. Xince $\mu_{\denta_{\alpha}\varphi+x\pri_{\clpha}}(\psi_{\alpha})=0$, Lemma \[lem:nodrift impliqs recutrfnce\] implies trat $\kt_{\alpga}\left(\mathbf{E}(\alpha)\right)=1$. By Young’s rormula we have $\dim_{H}(\ku_{\alpha})=\delta_{\alpha}$, which thfn glves an alternativf proof for the oower bound uf the Hausdorff dimenaion of $\mathbf{E}\left(\alpha\right)$.

\[Pruof oy Theorem \[tym:Visjmp and Jonew\]\] Firft suppose tmst $0\in\bhg[\underkine{\psi},\overlinc{\psi}\bmg]$. Tyen this corollary is a special case of Theorem \[dhj: Multifractal Dexonposijion\] fith $\qlpfa=0$ gy nkting hhav $\mathbf{R}=\mafhbf{E}\left(0\ritht)$ and $\mathbf{R}_{u}=\matnbs{V}_{i}\left(0\right)$. Ir $0\notig\byg[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$, then $\mathbx{R}=\mzthbf{E}\left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\nathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)={\varnlthing}$ anq $\delta_{0}=0$.

\[Proof of Theorem \[thm:-Transient-sets\]\]We only cmnsidxr tht nlrst xade, the second case follows in exactly the samq msnker. For this we cssume $\alpha=\mu_{\dektw\vstphi}\left(\psi\rigft)\ge0$. Snhcs $\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alphw'\right)\sobset\mqthbf{T}_{1}^{+}\subfet\msthbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for all $\alpha'>0$, we obtqin $$\begin{aliynee}
\delta & =\dim_{H}\left(\machbf{E}_{u}\left(\al'ha\rignt)\rignt)=\sup_{\alpha'>\alpha}\dim_{H}\left(\oathgf{E}_{u}\left(\alpja'\right)\rifft)\leq\dim_{H}\left(\matfbf{N}_{1}^{+
)\geq s.$$ Since $s<\delta_{\alpha}$ was arbitrary,and $\mu\left(C\right)=\mu\left(C\setminus\mathcal{D}\right)$ lower is established. Let $\mu_{\alpha}:=\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. Since implies $\mu_{\alpha}\left(\mathbf{E}(\alpha)\right)=1$. By Young’s we have $\dim_{H}(\mu_{\alpha})=\delta_{\alpha}$, then gives an alternative proof for lower bound of the Hausdorff dimension of $\mathbf{E}\left(\alpha\right)$. \[Proof of Theorem \[thm:Bishop and First suppose that $0\in\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$. Then this corollary is a special case of Theorem Multifractal with by that $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)$ and $\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)$. If $0\notin\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$, then $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)={\varnothing}$ and $\delta_{0}=0$. \[Proof of Theorem \[thm:-Transient-sets\]\]We only consider first case, the second case follows in exactly same manner. For this assume $\alpha=\mu_{\delta\varphi}\left(\psi\right)\ge0$. Since $\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\subset\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+}\subset\mathbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for $\alpha'>0$, obtain $$\begin{aligned} &
)\geq s.$$ Since $s<\delta_{\alpha}$ was arBitrary,and $\Mu\lefT(C\rIghT)=\mU\lefT(C\seTminus\mathcal{D}\RIght)$ The desired lower bound is EstabLiSHed.

\[rEM:MUltifRactal\_ALTeRNAtiVe\_prOof\] leT $\Mu_{\Alpha}:=\Mu_{\dElta_{\alpHa}\varphi+q\pSi_{\aLpHa}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. SincE $\Mu_{\Delta_{\alpha}\VarPhi+q\psi_{\alpha}}(\Psi_{\Alpha})=0$, LEmMa \[lEM:nodrIft ImpliEs recuRRence\] iMplies thaT $\mU_{\Alpha}\lEFt(\mathbF{e}(\AlPha)\rIght)=1$. By Young’s formuLA wE Have $\dim_{H}(\mu_{\alphA})=\delta_{\AlPHa}$, WHIch TheN gives an alTeRnatiVE proof fOR tHE LOweR Bound of the HauSdorff dimenSIon Of $\mathBf{e}\leFT(\alpha\Right)$.

\[prOOf oF Theorem \[thm:bishOp and JoneS\]\] First SUppose tHAt $0\in\big[\UnderlIne{\Psi},\OverLInE{\pSi}\bIg]$. tHen THiS coROllAry is a spEcIaL case Of ThEOREM \[thm: mulTifrActal decomposition\] WitH $\alpHA=0$ by NotinG that $\MathBf{r}=\mathBf{E}\lefT(0\righT)$ aNd $\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbF{E}_{u}\lEft(0\right)$. IF $0\noTiN\biG[\uNderlINe{\psi},\oVerLinE{\psi}\big]$, Then $\matHBf{R}=\MaTHBF{E}\Left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mAtHBF{E}_{U}\left(0\rigHt)={\varnOThInG}$ And $\delta_{0}=0$.

\[prOof Of ThEORem \[thM:-TraNSiEnt-sets\]\]WE only cONsIdEr the fiRsT case, tHe SecOnd Case fOLlowS in exaCtly the sAme maNNer. For this we asSUme $\alpha=\mu_{\delTA\vARPhI}\Left(\Psi\Right)\ge0$. SincE $\matHBf{E}_{u}\Left(\ALpHa'\rIGht)\suBset\mAtHBf{t}_{1}^{+}\Subset\mathbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for all $\AlPha'>0$, we oBtain $$\Begin{aligned}
\dElta & =\dim_{H}\leFT(\MAthbf{E}_{u}\lEft(\aLPhA\Right)\right)=\sup_{\aLpha'>\aLpha}\dim_{H}\leFT(\mathbf{E}_{U}\left(\Alpha'\rigHt)\right)\leQ\DIm_{H}\left(\mAthBf{T}_{1}^{+
)\geq s.$$ Since $s<\delta _{\alpha}$  wasarb itr ar y,an d $\ mu\left(C\righ t )=\m u\left(C\setminus\math cal{D }\ r ight ) $the d esiredl ow e r  bo un dises t ab lishe d.
\[rem: Multifract al\ _A lternative\_ P ro of\] Let $ \mu _{\alpha}:=\ mu_ {\delt a_ {\a l pha}\ var phi+q \psi_{ \ alpha} }\circ\pi ^{ - 1}$. S i nce $\m u _ {\ delt a_{\alpha}\varphi + q\ p si_{\alpha}}(\ psi_{\ al p ha } ) =0$ , L emma \[lem :n odrif t  implie s  r e c u rre n ce\] impliesthat $\mu_{ \ alp ha}\le ft (\m a thbf{E }(\al ph a )\r ight)=1$. B y Yo ung’s for mula w e  have $ \ dim_{H} (\mu_{ \al pha })=\ d el ta _{\ al p ha} $ ,whi c h t hen give san  alte rnat i v e proo f f or t he lo wer bound ofthe  Hau s dor ff di mensi on o f$\mat hbf{E} \left (\ alpha\right)$.
\[P roof of T heo re m \ [t hm:Bi s hop an d J one s\]\] F irst su p pos et h a t$0\in\big[\underli ne { \ ps i},\over line{\ p si }\ b ig]$. Th en  th is c o r ollar y is aspecialcase o f  T he orem \[ th m: Mul ti fra cta l Dec o mpos ition\ ] with $ \alph a =0$ by notingt hat $\mathbf{ R }= \ m at h bf{E }\l eft(0\right )$ a n d $\ math b f{ R}_ { u}=\m athbf {E } _{ u }\left(0\right)$. I f$0\not in\bi g[\underline{ \psi},\ove r l i ne{\psi} \big ] $, then $\mathbf{ R}=\m athbf{E}\l e ft(0\rig ht)=\ mathbf{R }_{u}=\ma t h bf{E}_{u }\l eft (0\ rig h t )= {\varnothing} $ and$\ delta_{ 0}= 0$.

\[ Pro ofofThe or em \[thm: -Transie nt -s et s\ ]\] We on l y consid er  th efir st ca s e, the  seco nd c as ef oll ows ine xa c t ly t he  s ameman ne r. Fo r th i s w e assum e $\alpha =\m u _{\d el ta \varphi }\left(\psi\r ig ht)\ge0$.Si nce  $\mat h b f{E}_{u} \left(\alpha'\right)\su b set\mat hbf {T}_{ 1}^{ +}\subset \ma thbf{T }_{ 2 }^{+}$  for a ll $\ al pha ' > 0$, w e ob tai n$$\begin{a l i gne d}
\d el ta &  =\dim_ {H}\left(\mathbf{E } _{u }\left(\alpha \ri ght) \ r ig ht) = \s u p_{ \a l pha ' > \alpha}\dim_{H} \left(\mat hb f {E }_{u}\left ( \al ph a'\righ t)\righ t)\le q \dim_{H }\left(\m athbf{T}_ {1 }^{+ 
)\geq s.$$_Since $s<\delta_{\alpha}$_was arbitrary,and $\mu\left(C\right)=\mu\left(C\setminus\mathcal{D}\right)$ the_desired lower_bound_is established.

\[rem:Multifractal\_Alternative\_Proof\]_Let_$\mu_{\alpha}:=\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}\circ\pi^{-1}$. Since $\mu_{\delta_{\alpha}\varphi+q\psi_{\alpha}}(\psi_{\alpha})=0$,_Lemma \[lem:nodrift implies_recurrence\] implies that $\mu_{\alpha}\left(\mathbf{E}(\alpha)\right)=1$._By Young’s formula_we_have $\dim_{H}(\mu_{\alpha})=\delta_{\alpha}$, which then gives an alternative proof for the lower bound of the_Hausdorff_dimension of_$\mathbf{E}\left(\alpha\right)$.

\[Proof_of_Theorem \[thm:Bishop and Jones\]\] First_suppose that $0\in\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$. Then this_corollary is_a special case of Theorem \[thm: Multifractal Decomposition\]_with_$\alpha=0$ by noting_that $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)$ and $\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)$. If $0\notin\big[\underline{\psi},\overline{\psi}\big]$, then $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{E}\left(0\right)=\mathbf{R}_{u}=\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(0\right)={\varnothing}$ and_$\delta_{0}=0$.

\[Proof of Theorem \[thm:-Transient-sets\]\]We only consider_the first case,_the_second_case follows in exactly_the same manner. For this we_assume $\alpha=\mu_{\delta\varphi}\left(\psi\right)\ge0$. Since $\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\subset\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+}\subset\mathbf{T}_{2}^{+}$ for all_$\alpha'>0$, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\delta & =\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha\right)\right)=\sup_{\alpha'>\alpha}\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{E}_{u}\left(\alpha'\right)\right)\leq\dim_{H}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1}^{+