.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\
C^{\rm exp}_{\rm max}&=&\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
0.193 & 0.138 & 0.125 & 0.122\\
0.138 & 0.108 & 0.099 & 0.097\\
0.125 & 0.099 & 0.091 & 0.090\\
0.122 & 0.097 & 0.090 & 0.088\\
\end{array}
\right)\,,\quad 
C^{\rm exp}_{\rm uc}\,=\,\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\
0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035\\
0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\
0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{array}\right)\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$

Appendix B: On the Equivalence of $\chi^2$-Functions {#appendix-b-on-the-equivalence-of-chi2-functions.unnumbered}
====================================================

In this appendix we demonstrate that a in which the auxiliary fit parameters $d_k$, which describe the correlated deviation off the experimental central value within experiment $k$, multiplies only the experimental systematical uncertainties,[^19] $$\chi^2 = \sum_k\left[d_k^2+\sum_{i,m}\left(\dfrac{R_i^{k,m}+d_k\,
\Delta_i^{k,m}-R_m}{\sigma_i^{k,m}}\right)^2\right]\,, \label{additive}$$ is mathematically equivalent to the well known written solely in terms of the fit parameters $R_m$ and a correlation matrix, $$\bar \chi^2=\sum_{i,j,k,m,n}(R_i^{k,m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{ij}^{mn}(R_j^{k,n}-R_n)\,,
\label{traditional}$$ where there is no correlation among the different experiments $k$ and $k^\prime$, and the correlation matrix within one experiment $k$ has the form $$(V_k)_{
.035 & 0.036 & 0.037 
 \end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\ 
 C^{\rm exp}_{\rm max}&=&\left (
 \begin{array}{cccc } 
 0.193 & 0.138 & 0.125 & 0.122\\ 
 0.138 & 0.108 & 0.099 & 0.097\\ 
 0.125 & 0.099 & 0.091 & 0.090\\ 
 0.122 & 0.097 & 0.090 & 0.088\\ 
 \end{array } 
 \right)\,,\quad 
 C^{\rm exp}_{\rm uc}\,=\,\left (
 \begin{array}{cccc } 
 0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\ 
 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035\\ 
 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\ 
 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036 & 0.037 
 \end{array}\right)\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ 

 Appendix B: On the Equivalence of $ \chi^2$-Functions { # appendix-b-on-the-equivalence-of-chi2-functions.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this appendix we demonstrate that a in which the auxiliary fit parameters $ d_k$, which describe the correlate diversion off the experimental central value within experiment $ k$, multiplies only the experimental systematical uncertainties,[^19 ] $ $ \chi^2 = \sum_k\left[d_k^2+\sum_{i, m}\left(\dfrac{R_i^{k, m}+d_k\, 
 \Delta_i^{k, m}-R_m}{\sigma_i^{k, m}}\right)^2\right]\, , \label{additive}$$ is mathematically equivalent to the well know write solely in terms of the fit parameter $ R_m$ and a correlation coefficient matrix, $ $ \bar \chi^2=\sum_{i, j, k, m, n}(R_i^{k, m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{ij}^{mn}(R_j^{k, n}-R_n)\, , 
 \label{traditional}$$ where there is no correlation among the different experiments $ k$ and $ k^\prime$, and the correlation matrix within one experiment $ k$ suffer the form $ $ (V_k) _ {
.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\
C^{\ro exp}_{\rm max}&=&\left(
\ywgin{arcay}{cccc}
0.193 & 0.138 & 0.125 & 0.122\\
0.138 & 0.108 & 0.099 & 0.097\\
0.125 & 0.099 & 0.091 & 0.090\\
0.122 & 0.097 & 0.090 & 0.088\\
\end{array}
\righv)\,,\quae 
C^{\rm exp}_{\rm uc}\,=\,\left(
\begin{arrah}{cccc}
0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\
0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035\\
0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\
0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{edray}\rigmc)\,.\nonujner\enb{aoigned}$$

Appendix B: On the Aquivalence of $\cfi^2$-Yunctions {#appendix-b-on-the-equivalence-os-chi2-funvtlons.unnumbered}
====================================================

Yn tnys aliekdix we demonstrate that a in whjch the auxiliary fiy parameters $d_k$, which descgibe the correlated degiation off the wxperimental central value within gxperiment $k$, multiplies only the expeximental sywtwmahhcal uncerteintief,[^19] $$\chi^2 = \sum_k\lcgt[d_k^2+\suk_{i,m}\left(\cfrac{R_i^{k,m}+d_k\,
\Delba_i^{k,m}-C_m}{\sitma_i^{k,m}}\right)^2\right]\,, \laben{additive}$$ is matheiatically esuivalent to the qeol knmwn fritgwn roltly ih termd oh the fit pzrameters $R_n$ and a correlation mwntix, $$\bar \chi^2=\shm_{i,j,k,m,g}(R_y^{k,m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{ij}^{mn}(R_j^{k,n}-R_n)\,,
\label{traditional}$$ where thsre is no correlation anong the different exkeriments $h$ and $k^\prime$, and the correlation matrix within ona expxrkmeub $y$ hws the form $$(V_k)_{
.035 & 0.036 & 0.037 \end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\ C^{\rm \begin{array}{cccc} & 0.138 0.125 & 0.122\\ & 0.125 & 0.099 0.091 & 0.090\\ & 0.097 & 0.090 & 0.088\\ \right)\,,\quad C^{\rm exp}_{\rm uc}\,=\,\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\ 0.034 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035\\ 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\ 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.037 Appendix B: On the Equivalence of $\chi^2$-Functions {#appendix-b-on-the-equivalence-of-chi2-functions.unnumbered} ==================================================== In this appendix we demonstrate that a which the auxiliary fit parameters $d_k$, which describe correlated deviation off the central value within experiment $k$, only experimental systematical $$\chi^2 \sum_k\left[d_k^2+\sum_{i,m}\left(\dfrac{R_i^{k,m}+d_k\, \label{additive}$$ is mathematically to the well known written solely in terms of the fit parameters $R_m$ and a correlation matrix, \chi^2=\sum_{i,j,k,m,n}(R_i^{k,m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{ij}^{mn}(R_j^{k,n}-R_n)\,, \label{traditional}$$ is no among different $k$ and $k^\prime$, correlation matrix within one experiment $k$ $$(V_k)_{
.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\
C^{\rm eXp}_{\rm max}&=&\lefT(
\begiN{arRay}{CcCc}
0.193 & 0.138 & 0.125 & 0.122\\
0.138 & 0.108 & 0.099 & 0.097\\
0.125 & 0.099 & 0.091 & 0.090\\
0.122 & 0.097 & 0.090 & 0.088\\
\enD{arrAy}
\right)\,,\quad 
C^{\rm EXp}_{\rm Uc}\,=\,\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\
0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035\\
0.033 & 0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\
0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\enD{arraY}\rIGht)\,.\nONuMber\eNd{alignED}$$

APPEndIx b: ON thE EQUiValenCe oF $\chi^2$-FunCtions {#appeNdiX-b-On-the-equivalENcE-of-chi2-funcTioNs.unnumbered}
====================================================

in tHis appEnDix WE demoNstRate tHat a in WHich thE auxiliarY fIT paramETers $d_k$, wHICh DescRibe the correlated DEvIAtion off the expErimenTaL CeNTRal ValUe within exPeRimenT $K$, multipLIeS ONLy tHE experimental SystematicaL UncErtainTiEs,[^19] $$\cHI^2 = \sum_k\lEft[d_k^2+\SuM_{I,m}\lEft(\dfrac{R_i^{k,M}+d_k\,
\DElta_i^{k,m}-R_m}{\Sigma_i^{K,M}}\right)^2\rIGht]\,, \labeL{additIve}$$ Is mAtheMAtIcAllY eQUivALeNt tO The Well knowN wRiTten sOlelY IN TErms Of tHe fiT paraMeters $R_m$ and a cOrrElatIOn mAtrix, $$\Bar \chI^2=\sum_{I,j,K,m,n}(R_i^{K,m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{Ij}^{mn}(R_J^{k,N}-R_n)\,,
\label{traditiOnal}$$ Where therE is No CorReLatioN Among tHe dIffErent exPerimenTS $k$ aNd $K^\PRImE$, and the correlation MaTRIx Within onE experIMeNt $K$ Has the foRm $$(v_k)_{
.035 & 0.036 & 0.037
\end{ array}\rig ht)\, ,\\ \no nu mber \\
C ^{\rm exp}_{\r m  max }&=&\left(
\begin{arra y}{cc cc } 
0.1 9 3& 0.1 38 & 0. 1 25 &  0. 12 2\ \
0 .1 3 8& 0.1 08& 0.099  & 0.097\\ 
0. 12 5 & 0.099 &0 .0 91 & 0.090 \\0.122 & 0.09 7 &  0.090  &  0. 0 88\\\en d{arr ay}
\r i ght)\, ,\quad 
C ^{ \ rm exp } _{\rm u c } \, =\,\ left(
\begin{arra y }{ c ccc}
0.037 & 0 .034 &  0 . 03 3 & 0 .03 4\\
0.034&0.033 & 0.034 &0 . 0 35\ \ 
0.033 & 0.03 4 & 0.035 & 0.0 36\\
0 .0 34&  0.035  & 0. 03 6  &0.037
\end{ arra y}\right) \,.\no n umber\e n d{align ed}$$
Ap pen dixB :On  th eE qui v al enc e  of  $\chi^2 $- Fu nctio ns { # a p p endi x-b -on- the-e quivalence-of -ch i2-f u nct ions. unnum bere d} 
==== ====== ===== == =============== ==== ========= === == ==
I n thi s  appen dix  we  demons trate t h atai n wh ich the auxiliaryfi t pa rameters  $d_k$ ,  w hi c h descri be  th e co r r elate d de v ia tion off  the e x pe ri mentalce ntralva lue  wi thine xper iment$k$, mul tipli e s only the exp e rimental syst e ma t i ca l  unc ert ainties,[^1 9] $ $ \chi ^2 = \s um_ k \left [d_k^ 2+ \ su m _{i,m}\left(\dfrac{ R_ i^{k,m }+d_k \,
\Delta_i^{ k,m}-R_m}{ \ s i gma_i^{k ,m}} \ ri g ht)^2\right]\, , \la bel{additi v e}$$ ismathe maticall y equival e n t to the  we llkno wnw r it ten solely in t erms  o f the f itparamet ers  $R _m$  an da correla tion mat ri x,  $ $\ bar  \chi ^ 2=\sum_{ i, j,k ,m ,n} (R_i^ { k,m}-R _m)(V _k^{ -1 }) _ {ij }^{mn}( R _j ^ { k,n} -R _n )\,, 
\l ab el{tr adit i ona l}$$ wh ere there  is no c or re lationamong the dif fe rent exper im ent s $k$a n d $k^\pr ime$, and the correlati o n matri x w ithin  one  experime nt$k$ ha s t h e form  $$(V_ k)_{
.035 &_0.036 &_0.037
\end{array}\right)\,,\\\nonumber\\
C^{\rm exp}_{\rm max}&=&\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
0.193 &_0.138 &_0.125_& 0.122\\
0.138_&_0.108 & 0.099_& 0.097\\
0.125 &_0.099 & 0.091 &_0.090\\
0.122 & 0.097_&_0.090 & 0.088\\
\end{array}
\right)\,,\quad 
C^{\rm exp}_{\rm uc}\,=\,\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
0.037 & 0.034 & 0.033 & 0.034\\
0.034 & 0.033_&_0.034 &_0.035\\
0.033_&_0.034 & 0.035 & 0.036\\
0.034_& 0.035 & 0.036 &_0.037
\end{array}\right)\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$

Appendix B:_On the Equivalence of $\chi^2$-Functions {#appendix-b-on-the-equivalence-of-chi2-functions.unnumbered}
====================================================

In this appendix_we_demonstrate that a_in which the auxiliary fit parameters $d_k$, which describe_the correlated deviation off the experimental_central value within_experiment_$k$,_multiplies only the experimental_systematical uncertainties,[^19] $$\chi^2 = \sum_k\left[d_k^2+\sum_{i,m}\left(\dfrac{R_i^{k,m}+d_k\,
\Delta_i^{k,m}-R_m}{\sigma_i^{k,m}}\right)^2\right]\,, \label{additive}$$_is mathematically equivalent to the well_known written solely in terms of the_fit parameters $R_m$ and a correlation_matrix, $$\bar \chi^2=\sum_{i,j,k,m,n}(R_i^{k,m}-R_m)(V_k^{-1})_{ij}^{mn}(R_j^{k,n}-R_n)\,,
\label{traditional}$$ where there_is no_correlation among the different experiments_$k$ and $k^\prime$,_and the_correlation matrix within_one experiment $k$ has the form_$$(V_k)_{