mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}} \bigr)-P_o-\gamma_3 =0 \nonumber \\
\mbox{or } &\frac{-\kappa^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}^{-1}}{\partial\gamma_2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3 =0 \nonumber \\
\mbox{or } &\frac{\kappa^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\bigl( \mathbf{F}^{-1}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}}{\partial\gamma_2} \mathbf{F}^{-1} \bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3 =0 \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $\gamma_3$ is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the Lagrangian, and we also have $\tfrac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial \gamma_2}=\mathbf{I}_N$. The complementary slackness and constraint qualifier for i.e. $\gamma_3\gamma_2=0$ and $\gamma_2\geq0$ form the rest of the equations comprising the KKT conditions. It is now readily shown that the solution to is given by $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq31}
&\bar{\gamma}_2=\max [0,\gamma_2] \\
&\gamma_2 \mbox{ solves } \gamma_2\left( \kappa^2\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^2\right)=0 \nonumber.\end{aligned}$$

\[propos3\] The parameter $\bar{\gamma}_2=0$ solves.

The spectral theorem for Hermitian matrices, allows for a decomposition, $\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{E}(\boldsymbol{\Lambda}+\gamma_
mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1 } \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w } } \bigr)-P_o-\gamma_3 = 0 \nonumber \\ 
 \mbox{or } & \frac{-\kappa^2 } { (\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1 } \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2 } } \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}^{-1}}{\partial\gamma_2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3 = 0 \nonumber \\ 
 \mbox{or } & \frac{\kappa^2 } { (\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1 } \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2 } } \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\bigl (\mathbf{F}^{-1}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}}{\partial\gamma_2 } \mathbf{F}^{-1 } \bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3 = 0 \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $ \gamma_3 $ is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the Lagrangian, and we also have $ \tfrac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial \gamma_2}=\mathbf{I}_N$. The complementary laxness and constraint modifier for i.e. $ \gamma_3\gamma_2=0 $ and $ \gamma_2\geq0 $ form the rest of the equation incorporate the KKT conditions. It is now promptly shown that the solution to is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{eq31 } 
 & \bar{\gamma}_2=\max [ 0,\gamma_2 ] \\ 
 & \gamma_2 \mbox { solves } \gamma_2\left (\kappa^2\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o (\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^2\right)=0 \nonumber.\end{aligned}$$ 

 \[propos3\ ] The parameter $ \bar{\gamma}_2=0 $ solves. 

 The apparitional theorem for Hermitian matrix, allows for a decay, $ \mathbf{F}=\mathbf{E}(\boldsymbol{\Lambda}+\gamma _
matjbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathnf{w}} \bigr)-P_o-\gamma_3 =0 \nonumbxr \\
\mbox{kr } &\frac{-\yappa^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{H}^{-1} \marhbf{G}^Y\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbw{G}\frac{\parnial\mathbd{F}^{-1}}{\pactial\gamma_2}\mathbf{J}^G\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gajla_3 =0 \uoiumber \\
\mbox{or } &\nrac{\kappa^2}{ ( \kathbf{w}^H\mathbf{C}\mxtkbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\figl( \mayhhf{F}^{-1}\frac{\partial\iathns{F}}{\padnicl\gamma_2} \mathbf{F}^{-1} \bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\matgbf{w}-P_o -\jamma_3 =0 \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $\gamma_3$ is the Lagrange multiplifr associatgs wyrh the Lagravgian, and we also have $\tfrac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial \gaoma_2}=\machbf{I}_N$. The xonplfkentary slarkness and constralmt quanifier gor i.e. $\gamma_3\gakma_2=0$ ane $\gamma_2\geq0$ form the rxst of the equations comprisitg the KKT conditiobs. It iv nof rexeilh sgoxn fhat tje aolution tk is given vy $$\begin{aligned}
 \labtl{ez31}
&\var{\gamma}_2=\max [0,\gzmma_2] \\
&\gwmia_2 \mbox{ solves } \gamma_2\left( \kappa^2\mathbf{w}^H\katgbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathvf{w}-P_o( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\lathbf{F}^{-1}\maehbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^2\right)=0 \nonumber.\end{aligned}$$

\[propos3\] The pdramevef $\bcv{\nammx}_2=0$ sllves.

The spectral theorem for Hermitian matrisss, aklows for a degomposition, $\mathbf{G}=\mwtnff{E}(\boldsymbol{\Uambda}+\yzmja_
mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}} \bigr)-P_o-\gamma_3 =0 \nonumber \\ \mbox{or ( \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}^{-1}}{\partial\gamma_2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o =0 \nonumber \\ \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{F}^{-1}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}}{\partial\gamma_2} \mathbf{F}^{-1} \bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o =0 \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ $\gamma_3$ is the Lagrange multiplier associated the Lagrangian, and we also have $\tfrac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial \gamma_2}=\mathbf{I}_N$. The complementary slackness and qualifier for i.e. $\gamma_3\gamma_2=0$ and $\gamma_2\geq0$ form the rest of the equations comprising KKT It now shown that the solution to is given by $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq31} &\bar{\gamma}_2=\max [0,\gamma_2] \\ &\gamma_2 \mbox{ solves \gamma_2\left( \kappa^2\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^2\right)=0 \nonumber.\end{aligned}$$ \[propos3\] The parameter $\bar{\gamma}_2=0$ The spectral theorem for matrices, allows for a decomposition,
mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\matHbf{w}} \bigr)-P_o-\Gamma_3 =0 \NonUmbEr \\
\Mbox{Or } &\frAc{-\kappa^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^h\MathBf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathBf{w})^{2}} \maThBF{w}^H\mAThBf{G}\frAc{\partiAL\mATHbf{f}^{-1}}{\pArTiaL\gAMmA_2}\mathBf{G}^h\mathbf{W}-P_o -\gamma_3 =0 \noNumBeR \\
\mbox{or } &\frac{\kAPpA^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^H\mAthBf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \maThbF{G}^H\matHbF{w})^{2}} \mAThbf{w}^h\maThbf{G}\Bigl( \maTHbf{F}^{-1}\frAc{\partial\MaTHbf{F}}{\paRTial\gamMA_2} \MaThbf{f}^{-1} \bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\mathBF{w}-p_O -\gamma_3 =0 \nonumber \End{aliGnED}$$ wHERe $\gAmmA_3$ is the LagrAnGe mulTIplier aSSoCIATed WIth the LagrangIan, and we alsO HavE $\tfrac{\PaRtiAL \mathbF{F}}{\parTiAL \gaMma_2}=\mathbf{I}_N$. the cOmplementAry slaCKness anD ConstraInt quaLifIer For i.E. $\GaMmA_3\gaMmA_2=0$ And $\GAmMa_2\gEQ0$ foRm the resT oF tHe equAtioNS COMpriSinG the kKT coNditions. It is nOw rEadiLY shOwn thAt the SoluTiOn to iS given By $$\begIn{Aligned}
 \label{eq31}
&\bAr{\gaMma}_2=\max [0,\gamMa_2] \\
&\gAmMa_2 \mBoX{ solvES } \gamma_2\LefT( \kaPpa^2\mathBf{w}^H\matHBf{G}\MaTHBF{F}^{-2}\Mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o( \mAtHBF{w}^h\mathbf{G}\Mathbf{f}^{-1}\MaThBF{G}^H\mathbF{w})^2\RigHt)=0 \noNUMber.\eNd{alIGnEd}$$

\[propos3\] the parAMeTeR $\bar{\gamMa}_2=0$ Solves.

thE spEctRal thEOrem For HerMitian maTriceS, Allows for a decoMPosition, $\mathbF{f}=\mATHbF{e}(\bolDsyMbol{\Lambda}+\gAmma_
mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \ mathbf{G}^ H\mat hbf {w} }\big r)-P _o-\gamma_3 =0 \non umber \\
\mbox{or } &\ frac{ -\ k appa ^ 2} { ( \ mathbf{ w }^ H \ mat hb f{ G}\ ma t hb f{F}^ {-1 } \math bf{G}^H\ma thb f{ w})^{2}} \ma t hb f{w}^H\mat hbf {G}\frac{\pa rti al\mat hb f{F } ^{-1} }{\ parti al\gam m a_2}\m athbf{G}^ H\ m athbf{ w }-P_o - \ g am ma_3  =0 \nonumber \\\ mb o x{or } &\frac{ \kappa ^2 } {( \ma thb f{w}^H\mat hb f{G}\ m athbf{F } ^{ - 1 }  \m a thbf{G}^H\mat hbf{w})^{2} }  \m athbf{ w} ^H\ m athbf{ G}\bi gl (  \m athbf{F}^{- 1}\f rac{\part ial\ma t hbf{F}} { \partia l\gamm a_2 } \ math b f{ F} ^{- 1} \bi g r) \ma t hbf {G}^H\ma th bf {w}-P _o - \ g a m ma_3  =0  \no numbe r \end{aligne d}$ $ wh e re$\gam ma_3$  isth e Lag rangemulti pl ier associatedwith  the Lagr ang ia n,an d wea lso ha ve$\t frac{\p artial\ mat hb f { F }} {\partial \gamma_2 }= \ m at hbf{I}_N $. The co mp l ementary  s lac knes s and c onst r ai nt quali fier f o ri. e. $\ga mm a_3\ga mm a_2 =0$  and$ \gam ma_2\g eq0$ for m the rest of the eq u ations compri s in g th e  KKT  co nditions. I t is nowread i ly  sh o wn th at th es ol u tion to is given by  $ $\begi n{ali gned}
 \label {eq31}
&\b a r { \gamma}_ 2=\m a x[ 0,\gamma_2] \\ 
&\ga mma_2 \mbo x { solves  } \g amma_2\l eft( \kap p a ^2\mathb f{w }^H \ma thb f { G} \mathbf{F}^{- 2 } \mat hb f{G}^H\ mat hbf{w}- P_o ( \ mat hbf {w }^H\mathb f{G}\mat hb f{ F} ^{ -1} \math b f{G}^H\m at hbf {w })^ 2\rig h t)=0 \ nonum ber. \e nd { ali gned}$$ 
\ [ p ropo s3 \]  The  pa ra meter  $\b a r{\ gamma}_ 2=0$ solv es. 
The  s pe ctral t heorem for He rm itian matr ic es,  allow s for a de composition, $\mathbf{F } =\mathb f{E }(\bo ldsy mbol{\Lam bda }+\gam ma_ 
mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1} \mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}}_\bigr)-P_o-\gamma_3 =0_\nonumber \\
\mbox{or } &\frac{-\kappa^2}{_( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}_\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}}_\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}^{-1}}{\partial\gamma_2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3_=0_\nonumber \\
\mbox{or }_&\frac{\kappa^2}{ ( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}_\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^{2}} \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\bigl( \mathbf{F}^{-1}\frac{\partial\mathbf{F}}{\partial\gamma_2} \mathbf{F}^{-1}_\bigr)\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o -\gamma_3 =0_\nonumber_\end{aligned}$$ where $\gamma_3$ is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the Lagrangian, and we also_have_$\tfrac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial_\gamma_2}=\mathbf{I}_N$._The_complementary slackness and constraint qualifier_for i.e. $\gamma_3\gamma_2=0$ and $\gamma_2\geq0$_form the_rest of the equations comprising the KKT conditions._It_is now readily_shown that the solution to is given by $$\begin{aligned}
_\label{eq31}
&\bar{\gamma}_2=\max [0,\gamma_2] \\
&\gamma_2 \mbox{ solves }_\gamma_2\left( \kappa^2\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-2}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w}-P_o( \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{G}\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{G}^H\mathbf{w})^2\right)=0_\nonumber.\end{aligned}$$

\[propos3\]_The_parameter $\bar{\gamma}_2=0$ solves.

The spectral_theorem for Hermitian matrices, allows for_a decomposition, $\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{E}(\boldsymbol{\Lambda}+\gamma_