 case of GdCo$_2$ as well as in the case of other magnetic RCo$_2$ compounds with heavy R-elements, the 4f–3d exchange interaction is described by introducing an effective field which acts on 3d electrons as: $$B_{\rm eff}=n_{\rm
fd}M_{\rm f}-B$$ where B is external field, M$_f$ is the uniform magnetization of R - sublattice, and $n_{\rm fd}$ - is the f–d coupling constant (in case of GdCo$_2$ $n_{\rm fd}\approx 50$ T/f.u.$\mu_{\rm B}$[@Goto2001]). In Y$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$Co$_{2}$ alloys the Gd moments are randomly distributed over the R-sites of the crystal lattice. Therefore, the effective field acting on 3d electrons depends on the local distribution of Gd moments and is therefore a random function of coordinate. This random field can be characterized by a distribution function $P\{B_{\rm eff}(r)\}$. The spatially fluctuating effective field induces an inhomogeneous magnetization of Co-3d electron system: $$m(r)=\chi \left( B_{\rm
eff}\right) B_{\rm eff}\left( r\right).$$ Therefore even at zero temperature in the ferromagnetic ground state, there are two kind of static magnetic fluctuations in the system: i. $M_{\rm f}(r)$; ii. $m(r)$. These fluctuations give an additional contribution to the resistivity. Since at T=0 K in ferromagnetic phase the 4f magnetic moments are saturated the corresponding contribution to the resistivity does not depend on external magnetic field. On the other hand, the 3d magnetic moment, as we will see later, is not saturated even in the ferromagnetic ground state. Therefore the 3d magnetization does depend on the external field. However, as long as 3d susceptibility is field independent and uniform, the external magnetic field will change only the mean (non-fluctuating part) value of the magnetization, whereas the magnitude of the fluctuations of $m$ and corresponding contribution to the resistivity remain unchanged. However actually, the 3d system is close to the metamagnetic instability. Therefore the 3d susceptibility $\chi $ is field dependent and gives rise to static magnetic fluctuations which are dependent on magnetic field resulting in non-zero magnetoresistivity.

For a qualitative analysis of this new mechanism of MR we make the following assumptions
case of GdCo$_2 $ as well as in the case of other charismatic RCo$_2 $ compound with heavy R - chemical element, the 4f–3d rally interaction is described by introducing an effective playing field which act on 3d electrons as: $ $ B_{\rm eff}=n_{\rm 
 fd}M_{\rm f}-B$$ where B is external field, M$_f$ is the uniform magnetization of radius - sublattice, and $ n_{\rm fd}$ - is the f – d coupling changeless (in case of GdCo$_2 $ $ n_{\rm fd}\approx 50 $   T / f.u.$\mu_{\rm B}$[@Goto2001 ]). In Y$_{1 - x}$Gd$_{x}$Co$_{2}$ alloys the Gd moments are randomly distributed over the R - site of the crystal lattice. Therefore, the effective playing field acting on 3d electrons depends on the local distribution of Gd moments and is consequently a random function of coordinate. This random playing field can be characterized by a distribution function $ P\{B_{\rm eff}(r)\}$. The spatially fluctuating effective field induce an inhomogeneous magnetization of Co-3d electron system: $ $ m(r)=\chi \left (B_{\rm 
 eff}\right) B_{\rm eff}\left (r\right).$$ Therefore even at zero temperature in the ferromagnetic ground state, there are two kind of inactive magnetic fluctuations in the system: i. $ M_{\rm f}(r)$; ii. $ m(r)$. These fluctuations give an additional contribution to the resistivity. Since at T=0   K in ferromagnetic phase the 4f magnetic moments are saturated the comparable contribution to the electric resistance does not depend on external magnetic field. On the early bridge player, the 3d magnetic moment, as we will see later, is not saturated even in the ferromagnetic ground department of state. Therefore the 3d magnetization does depend on the external field. However, as long as 3d susceptibility is airfield independent and uniform, the external magnetic field will transfer only the beggarly (non - fluctuating part) value of the magnetization, whereas the magnitude of the fluctuations of $ m$ and corresponding contribution to the resistivity persist unchanged. However actually, the 3d system is cheeseparing to the metamagnetic instability. Therefore the 3d susceptibility $ \chi $ is field subject and gives advance to static magnetic fluctuation which are dependent on charismatic field resulting in non - zero magnetoresistivity. 

 For a qualitative analysis of this new mechanism of MR we form the following assumptions
 cade of GdCo$_2$ as well as in the case of otkwr magietic RDo$_2$ compojnds with heavy R-elements, thx 4f–3d exchqnge interaction is dercribed bj introduxing qn effectits field which wcts in 3d electrons as: $$B_{\rm efx}=n_{\rm
fd}M_{\rm f}-B$$ wvefe B is external field, M$_f$ is the unifjrm magmehization of R - subkwttidv, cnd $n_{\rm fd}$ - is the f–d coupling donstanu (in case of GdCo$_2$ $m_{\rm fd}\approx 50$ T/f.u.$\mu_{\rm B}$[@Goto2001]). In J$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$Co$_{2}$ alloys the Gd moments are eandomly disgributed onzr the R-sitgs of the crystal lattice. Therefure, tke effectivg rifnd acting oi 3d elvctrons depends on tha local distribution pf Jd miments and is therefoce a random function of coordhncte. This random field cqn be chasactdeizdd gy a distrlbuvion functikn $P\{B_{\rm eff}(e)\}$. The spatially fluvttqting effectibe fiejd induces an inhomogeneous magnetization of Co-3d electron system: $$m(r)=\xhi \left( B_{\rm
eff}\right) H_{\rm eff}\lest( r\right).$$ Therefore even at zero temperature in tve fecrumaykctic trlund state, there are two kind of static magneejc fkuctuations in the system: i. $M_{\ti f}(r)$; ii. $m(r)$. Thgse fluefuztions give an addltional conteibution uo thr resistivity. Since at T=0 K ib ferromagnenic phase the 4f magnetnc moments axe satorated the corresponding contxibutikn to the rfsistivitg does not depend on efternal magnetic field. On ehe other hanb, the 3d oagngtic moient, as we will see later, is not swturajed evan in the verromagnetic ground state. Therxhore the 3d mabnatidation dozs depcnd on the extewnal field. Howgver, as ljng ar 3d suscepnibility ms field indqpendent and gjiform, the eeternal mwgneric dield wkul change only the mean (non-fluctuqting part) value on the jagnetization, wktreqs the magnitudr ow tre fkusduations of $k$ ana cutrespunding contvibjtiom to the resistivity remzin unchanged. Howefev actualli, the 3d srstem is closr to the metamagneuic invtauility. Thgrefore the 3d susceptibility $\chj $ is fiepd qependent anq giyes tise to stacic magnetic fluctuations which are depeident on magnetic field resulting in non-zeto kagnetoresixtiviey.

For a qgalitative analysis if this new mechakism of MR we make the follofing wssumptions
case of GdCo$_2$ as well as in of magnetic RCo$_2$ with heavy R-elements, described introducing an effective which acts on electrons as: $$B_{\rm eff}=n_{\rm fd}M_{\rm f}-B$$ B is external field, M$_f$ is the uniform magnetization of R - sublattice, $n_{\rm fd}$ - is the f–d coupling constant (in case of GdCo$_2$ $n_{\rm 50$ B}$[@Goto2001]). Y$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$Co$_{2}$ the Gd moments are randomly distributed over the R-sites of the crystal lattice. Therefore, the effective acting on 3d electrons depends on the local of Gd moments and therefore a random function of This field can characterized a function $P\{B_{\rm eff}(r)\}$. spatially fluctuating effective field induces an inhomogeneous magnetization of Co-3d electron system: $$m(r)=\chi \left( B_{\rm eff}\right) B_{\rm r\right).$$ Therefore zero temperature the ground there are two static magnetic fluctuations in the system: ii. $m(r)$. These fluctuations give an additional contribution the resistivity. at T=0 K in ferromagnetic phase 4f magnetic moments are saturated the corresponding contribution the resistivity does not depend on external magnetic field. On the other hand, the 3d as we will see is not saturated in ferromagnetic state. the 3d does depend on the external field. However, as long as 3d is field independent and uniform, the external magnetic field will the (non-fluctuating part) value the magnetization, whereas the of fluctuations of $m$ and to resistivity actually, 3d is close to the instability. Therefore the 3d susceptibility $ is field dependent magnetic fluctuations which are dependent on magnetic field in non-zero magnetoresistivity. For a qualitative analysis this new mechanism of MR we make the following assumptions
 case of GdCo$_2$ as well as in the caSe of other mAgnetIc Rco$_2$ cOmPounDs wiTh heavy R-elemenTS, the 4F–3d exchange interaction iS descRiBEd by INtRoducIng an efFEcTIVe fIeLd WhiCh ACtS on 3d eLecTrons as: $$b_{\rm eff}=n_{\rm
fD}M_{\rM f}-b$$ where B is extERnAl field, M$_f$ iS thE uniform magnEtiZation Of r - suBLattiCe, aNd $n_{\rm Fd}$ - is thE F–d coupLing constAnT (In case OF GdCo$_2$ $n_{\rM FD}\aPproX 50$ T/f.u.$\mu_{\rm B}$[@Goto2001]). In Y$_{1-x}$gD$_{x}$cO$_{2}$ alloys the Gd moMents aRe RAnDOMly DisTributed ovEr The R-sITes of thE CrYSTAl lATtice. ThereforE, the effectiVE fiEld actInG on 3D ElectrOns dePeNDs oN the local diStriBution of GD momenTS and is tHErefore A randoM fuNctIon oF CoOrDinAtE. thiS RaNdoM FieLd can be cHaRaCteriZed bY A DIStriButIon fUnctiOn $P\{B_{\rm eff}(r)\}$. The SpaTialLY flUctuaTing eFfecTiVe fieLd induCes an InHomogeneous magnEtizAtion of Co-3D elEcTroN sYstem: $$M(R)=\chi \leFt( B_{\Rm
eFf}\right) b_{\rm eff}\lEFt( r\RiGHT).$$ thErefore even at zero tEmPERaTure in thE ferroMAgNeTIc ground StAte, TherE ARe two Kind OF sTatic magNetic fLUcTuAtions iN tHe systEm: I. $M_{\rM f}(r)$; Ii. $m(r)$. THEse fLuctuaTions givE an adDItional contribUTion to the resiSTiVITy. sInce At T=0 k in ferromagNetiC PhasE the 4F MaGneTIc momEnts aRe SAtURated the correspondiNg ContriButioN to the resistiVity does noT DEPend on exTernAL mAGnetic field. On tHe othEr hand, the 3d MAgnetic mOment, As we will See later, iS NOt saturaTed EveN in The FERrOmagnetic grouND StatE. THereforE thE 3d magneTizAtiOn dOes DePend on the External FiElD. HOwEveR, as loNG as 3d suscEpTibIlIty Is fieLD indepEndenT and UnIfORm, tHe exterNAl MAGnetIc FiEld wIll ChAnge oNly tHE meAn (non-flUctuating ParT) ValuE oF tHe magneTization, whereAs The magnituDe Of tHe flucTUAtions of $M$ and corresponding contriBUtion to The ResisTiviTy remain uNchAnged. HOweVEr actuAlly, thE 3d sysTeM is CLOse to THE mEtaMaGnetic instABIliTy. TheReFore The 3d susCeptibility $\chi $ is fiELd dEpendent and giVes Rise TO StAtiC MaGNetIc FLucTUAtions which are dEpendent on MaGNeTic field reSUltInG in non-zEro magnEtoreSIstivitY.

For a qualItative anAlYsis OF ThiS new mechanIsm of MR wE make the fOLlowiNG aSsumpTioNs
 case of GdCo$_2$ as wellas in thecaseofoth er  mag neti c RCo$_2$ comp o unds  with heavy R-elements , the  4 f –3de xc hange  intera c ti o n  is  d es cri be d  b y int rod ucing a n effectiv e f ie ld which act s  o n 3d elect ron s as: $$B_{\ rmeff}=n _{ \rm fd}M_ {\r m f}- B$$ wh e re B i s externa lf ield,M $_f$ is t he  uni form magnetizatio n  o f  R - sublattic e, and  $ n _{ \ r m f d}$  - is thef– d cou p ling co n st a n t  (i n  case of GdCo $_2$ $n_{\r m  fd }\appr ox  50 $  T/f.u .$\mu _{ \ rmB}$[@Goto20 01]) . In Y$_{ 1-x}$G d $_{x}$C o $_{2}$alloys  th e G d mo m en ts  ar er and o ml y d i str ibuted o ve rthe R -sit e s o f th e c ryst al la ttice. Theref ore , th e  ef fecti ve fi eldac tingon 3delect ro ns depends on t he l ocal dist rib ut ion  o f Gdm oments  an d i s there fore ar and om f u nc tion of coordinate .T h is  randomfieldc an  b e  charact er ize d by a  dist ribu t io n functi on $P\ { B_ {\ rm eff} (r )\}$.Th e s pat ially fluc tuatin g effect ive f i eld induces an inhomogeneous ma g n et i zati onof Co-3d el ectr o n sy stem :  $ $m( r )=\ch i \le ft (  B _ {\rm
eff}\right) B_ {\ rm eff }\lef t( r\right).$ $ Therefor e e ven at z erot em p erature in the  ferr omagneticg round st ate,there ar e two kin d of stati c m agn eti c f l u ct uations in th e syst em : i. $M _{\ rm f}(r )$;  ii . $ m(r )$ . These f luctuati on sgi ve  an  addi t ional co nt rib ut ion  to t h e resi stivi ty.Si nc e  at  T=0 Ki nf e rrom ag ne ticpha se  the4f m a gne tic mom ents aresat u rate dth e corre sponding cont ri bution toth e r esisti v i ty doesnot depend on externalm agnetic  fi eld.On t he otherhan d, the  3d magnet ic mom ent,as  we w ill s e e  l ate r,  is not sa t u rat ed ev en  inthe fer romagnetic grounds tat e. Thereforethe  3dm a gn eti z at i ondo e s d e p end on the exte rnal field .H ow ever, as l o ngas  3d sus ceptibi lityi s field  independ ent and u ni form , the  externalmagnetic  field wi l l cha n ge  only  th e mean  ( non -fluc tuatin g  pa rt) v alue o fthe ma gneti za tion, wh ereas the magnitude ofthe fl uctua tio ns of $m$  an d  co rrespondi ng c ontributio n t o t he re sis t ivity  rem a in  un c hange d. H o wever act u al ly, t he  3d systemi s clo se to  th e  metam agne tic instability.T herefore the 3 d su s c ept ibi l ity$\ chi $ is field  de pe n d ent andgi ves rise to  staticma g netic  fluct uation s which a re depend entonmagneticfie ld resulti ng  i n  non-z eroma gnetor esisti v ity. For a qualitativ e ana l y sis o f  th is ne wmechani s m of  MR we mak e the follo wing a ssum ption s
 case_of GdCo$_2$_as well as in_the case_of_other magnetic_RCo$_2$_compounds with heavy_R-elements, the 4f–3d_exchange interaction is described_by introducing an_effective_field which acts on 3d electrons as: $$B_{\rm eff}=n_{\rm
fd}M_{\rm f}-B$$ where B is external_field,_M$_f$ is_the_uniform_magnetization of R - sublattice,_and $n_{\rm fd}$ - is_the f–d_coupling constant (in case of GdCo$_2$ $n_{\rm fd}\approx_50$ T/f.u.$\mu_{\rm_B}$[@Goto2001]). In Y$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$Co$_{2}$_alloys the Gd moments are randomly distributed over the_R-sites of the crystal lattice. Therefore,_the effective field_acting_on_3d electrons depends on_the local distribution of Gd moments_and is therefore a random function_of coordinate. This random field can be_characterized by a distribution function $P\{B_{\rm_eff}(r)\}$. The spatially fluctuating effective_field induces_an inhomogeneous magnetization of Co-3d_electron system: $$m(r)=\chi_\left( B_{\rm
eff}\right)_B_{\rm eff}\left( r\right).$$_Therefore even at zero temperature in_the ferromagnetic ground_state, there are two kind of_static_magnetic fluctuations in_the_system:_i. $M_{\rm_f}(r)$; ii. $m(r)$._These_fluctuations give_an_additional contribution to the resistivity. Since_at_T=0 K in ferromagnetic phase the 4f magnetic_moments are saturated the_corresponding_contribution to the resistivity_does not depend on external_magnetic field. On the other hand,_the 3d_magnetic moment,_as we will see later, is not saturated even in the_ferromagnetic ground state. Therefore the 3d_magnetization does depend on_the external_field._However, as long_as_3d susceptibility_is field independent and uniform, the external_magnetic field_will change only the mean (non-fluctuating_part) value of the_magnetization,_whereas the magnitude of the fluctuations_of $m$ and corresponding contribution to_the resistivity remain unchanged. However_actually,_the_3d system is close to_the metamagnetic instability. Therefore the 3d_susceptibility $\chi $_is field dependent and gives rise to_static_magnetic fluctuations which are dependent on_magnetic_field resulting in non-zero magnetoresistivity.

For a_qualitative_analysis_of this new mechanism of_MR we make the following assumptions