 to define the following expression in this domain $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$:

$$\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)]$$

with:

$\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)= \varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$

$\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=\varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$\
\
For a B-F solution $Y$, it is necessary to be a fuzzy number for this one. If, for each pair $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$, $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ defines an $\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number, then, Buckley and Feuring [@BuckleyFeuring99] call to $\tilde{Y_i}(x_1,x_2)$ **differentiable**, and we can write: $$\varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)[\alpha]=\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha),$$ $\forall(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2,\quad\forall\alpha$.\
\
So that, it is necessary to test if $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ really define an $\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number and verify the differentiability of $\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)$. For a triangular fuzzy number, the conditions are [@GoetschelVoxman86] :

1.  $\varphi(D_{x_1},
    D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ is an increasing function of $\alpha$, for each $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$.

2.  $\varphi(D_{x_1},
    D_{x_2})y_
to define the following expression in this domain $ \Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$: 

 $ $ \Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)]$$ 

 with: 

 $ \Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)= \varphi(D_{x_1 }, 
 D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ 

 $ \Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=\varphi(D_{x_1 }, 
 D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$\ 
 \ 
 For a B - F solution $ Y$, it is necessary to be a fuzzy numeral for this one. If, for each couple $ (x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2 $, $ \Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ defines an $ \alpha$-cut of a fuzzy numeral, then, Buckley and Feuring [ @BuckleyFeuring99 ] shout to $ \tilde{Y_i}(x_1,x_2)$ * * differentiable * *, and we can write: $ $ \varphi(D_{x_1 }, 
 D_{x_2})\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)[\alpha]=\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha),$$ $ \forall(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2,\quad\forall\alpha$.\ 
 \ 
 So that, it is necessary to test if $ \Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ very specify an $ \alpha$-cut of a fuzzy act and verify the differentiability of $ \tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)$. For a triangular fuzzy issue, the conditions are [ @GoetschelVoxman86 ]: 

 1.   $ \varphi(D_{x_1 }, 
     D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ is an increasing routine of $ \alpha$, for each $ (x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$. 

 2.   $ \varphi(D_{x_1 }, 
     D_{x_2})y _
 to define the following exkression in this bimain $\Jamma(x_1,x_2,\zlpha)$:

$$\Gamoa(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\elphq)]$$

with:

$\Tamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)= \varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{b_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$

$\Hamma_2(x_1,x_2,\aopha)=\tarphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpiz)$\
\
For a N-Y solhbion $V$, mt is necessary to be a fgzzy number fos ghns one. If, for each pair $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$, $\Gamms(x_1,d_2,\alpha)$ defines an $\sjpha$-dlt of a fuzzy number, then, Bucklsy and Heuring [@BuckleyGeuring99] call to $\tilde{Y_i}(x_1,x_2)$ **fifffrentiable**, and we fan write: $$\vqrphy(E_{x_1},
D_{x_2})\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)[\xlpha]=\Gamma(q_1,r_2,\alpha),$$ $\foraml(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2,\quad\forall\alpha$.\
\
Ro thct, it is nexewsagi to test if $\Gammw(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ really defite an $\akpha$-cut of a fmzzy iumbwr and verify the difherentiability of $\tijde{Y}(x_1,x_2)$. Fos c triangular fuzzy nunbwr, thg congitiubs xre [@GpefschelGoxjan86] :

1.  $\varpgi(D_{x_1},
    D_{x_2})y_1(z_1,x_2,\alpha)$ is an incressybg function or $\alphw$, sor each $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$.

2.  $\varphi(D_{x_1},
    D_{x_2})j_
to define the following expression in this $$\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)]$$ $\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)= \varphi(D_{x_1}, $\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=\varphi(D_{x_1}, D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$\ \ it necessary to be fuzzy number for one. If, for each pair $(x_1, S_1\times S_2$, $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ defines an $\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number, then, Buckley and [@BuckleyFeuring99] call to $\tilde{Y_i}(x_1,x_2)$ **differentiable**, and we can write: $$\varphi(D_{x_1}, D_{x_2})\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)[\alpha]=\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha),$$ $\forall(x_1, x_2)\in S_2,\quad\forall\alpha$.\ So it necessary to test if $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ really define an $\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number and verify the of $\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)$. For a triangular fuzzy number, the are [@GoetschelVoxman86] : 1. D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ is an increasing function $\alpha$, each $(x_1, S_1\times 2. D_{x_2})y_
 to define the following expreSsion in thiS domaIn $\GAmmA(x_1,X_2,\alpHa)$:

$$\GaMma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\GammA_1(X_1,x_2,\alPha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)]$$

with:

$\GamMa_1(x_1,x_2,\aLpHA)= \varPHi(d_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(X_1,x_2,\alpha)$

$\gAmMA_2(X_1,x_2,\aLpHa)=\VarPhI(d_{x_1},
d_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\AlpHa)$\
\
For a B-f solution $Y$, It iS nEcessary to be A FuZzy number fOr tHis one. If, for eAch Pair $(x_1, x_2)\In s_1\tiMEs S_2$, $\GaMma(X_1,x_2,\alpHa)$ defiNEs an $\alPha$-cut of a FuZZy numbER, then, BuCKLeY and feuring [@BuckleyFeuRInG99] Call to $\tilde{Y_i}(x_1,X_2)$ **diffeReNTiABLe**, aNd wE can write: $$\vArPhi(D_{x_1},
d_{X_2})\tilde{Y}(X_1,X_2)[\aLPHA]=\GaMMa(x_1,x_2,\alpha),$$ $\foraLl(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\timeS s_2,\quAd\foraLl\AlpHA$.\
\
So thaT, it is NeCEssAry to test if $\gammA(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ rEally dEFine an $\aLPha$-cut oF a fuzzY nuMbeR and VErIfY thE dIFfeREnTiaBIliTy of $\tildE{Y}(X_1,x_2)$. for a tRianGULAR fuzZy nUmbeR, the cOnditions are [@GOetScheLvoxMan86] :

1.  $\vaRphi(D_{X_1},
    D_{x_2})y_1(X_1,x_2,\Alpha)$ Is an inCreasInG function of $\alphA$, for Each $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\TimEs s_2$.

2.  $\vaRpHi(D_{x_1},
    D_{X_2})Y_
 to define the following e xpressionin th isdom ai n $\ Gamm a(x_1,x_2,\alp h a)$: 

$$\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\al pha)= [\ G amma _ 1( x_1,x _2,\alp h a) , \ Gam ma _2 (x_ 1, x _2 ,\alp ha) ]$$

wi th:

$\Gam ma_ 1( x_1,x_2,\alp h a) = \varphi( D_{ x_1},
D_{x_2 })y _1(x_1 ,x _2, \ alpha )$
$\Ga mma_2( x _1,x_2 ,\alpha)= \v a rphi(D _ {x_1},D _ {x _2}) y_1(x_1,x_2,\alph a )$ \ 
\
For a B-F s olutio n$ Y$ , itisnecessaryto  be a fuzzy n u mb e r for this one. If,  for each p a ir$(x_1,  x _2) \ in S_1 \time sS _2$ , $\Gamma(x _1,x _2,\alpha )$ def i nes an$ \alpha$ -cut o f a  fu zzyn um be r,th e n,B uc kle y  an d Feurin g[@ Buckl eyFe u r i n g99]  ca ll t o $\t ilde{Y_i}(x_1 ,x_ 2)$* *di ffere ntiab le** ,and w e canwrite :$$\varphi(D_{x_ 1},D_{x_2})\ til de {Y} (x _1,x_ 2 )[\alp ha] =\G amma(x_ 1,x_2,\ a lph a) , $ $  $ \forall(x_1, x_2)\ in S _1 \times S _2,\qu a d\ fo r all\alph a$ .\\
So t hat,it i s  n ecessary  to te s tif  $\Gamm a( x_1,x_ 2, \al pha )$ re a llydefine  an $\al pha$- c ut of a fuzzyn umber and ver i fy t he diff ere ntiabilityof $ \ tild e{Y} ( x_ 1,x _ 2)$.For a  t r ia n gular fuzzy number,  t he con ditio ns are [@Goet schelVoxma n 8 6 ] :

1. $\v a rp h i(D_{x_1},
   D_{x _2})y_1(x_ 1 ,x_2,\al pha)$  is an i ncreasing f unctionof$\a lph a$, f or  each $(x_1,x _ 2)\i nS_1\tim esS_2$.
2. $\ var phi (D _{x_1},
   D_{x_ 2} )y _
 to_define the_following expression in this_domain $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$:

$$\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=[\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha),\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)]$$

with:

$\Gamma_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=_\varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$

$\Gamma_2(x_1,x_2,\alpha)=\varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$\
\
For_a B-F_solution_$Y$, it is_necessary to be_a fuzzy number for_this one. If,_for_each pair $(x_1, x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$, $\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ defines an $\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number,_then,_Buckley and_Feuring_[@BuckleyFeuring99]_call to $\tilde{Y_i}(x_1,x_2)$ **differentiable**, and_we can write: $$\varphi(D_{x_1},
D_{x_2})\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)[\alpha]=\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha),$$ $\forall(x_1,_x_2)\in S_1\times_S_2,\quad\forall\alpha$.\
\
So that, it is necessary to test if_$\Gamma(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$_really define an_$\alpha$-cut of a fuzzy number and verify the differentiability_of $\tilde{Y}(x_1,x_2)$. For a triangular fuzzy_number, the conditions_are_[@GoetschelVoxman86]_:

1.  $\varphi(D_{x_1},
 _  D_{x_2})y_1(x_1,x_2,\alpha)$ is an increasing_function of $\alpha$, for each $(x_1,_x_2)\in S_1\times S_2$.

2.  $\varphi(D_{x_1},
  _ D_{x_2})y_