rat1}
H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and} \qquad
H_{c+1}eH_{c+1} = H_{c+1}\quad\text{for}\  c\geq 0.$$ Similarly, as $H_{c}e$ is a projective left $H_{c}$-module, $E_c$ will be a Morita equivalence if we prove that $$\label{morrat11}
H_ceH_c = H_c \quad \text{for}\ c\geq 0.$$ Since $\widetilde{S}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\circ S_{c}\circ E_{c}$, Equations \[morrat1\] and \[morrat11\] will suffice to prove the theorem.

The proof of Theorem \[morrat\] will be through a series of lemmas and we begin with the first equality in. Set $d=c+1$; thus $d\in {\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 1}$, with $d\notin \frac{1}{2}+{\mathbb{Z}}$.

Reduction to Category ${\mathcal{O}}$ {#subsec-4.2}
-------------------------------------

If $H_de_-H_d$ is a *proper* two-sided ideal of $H_d$ it must be contained in a primitive ideal, and hence, by [@ginz Generalized Duflo Theorem], annihilate an object from category $\mathcal{O}_d$. Thus it is enough to show that $e_-$ does not annihilate any simple module belonging to $\mathcal{O}_d$.

To do this we first show in Corollary \[poono\] that the composition factors of $\Delta_d(\mu)$ are of the form $L_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambda \leq \mu$. Under the ${\mathbb{Z}}$-strings ordering such a result is proved in [@guay] but as we work with the dominance ordering of partitions and representations, as defined in, this definitely requires work, see also. We then show that the lowest weight copy of the sign module for ${{W}}$ in $\Delta_d(\mu)$ does not occur in any standard module $\Delta_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambda < \mu$. Since $L_d(\mu)$ is the head (that is, the unique simple factor module) of $\Delta_
rat1 } 
 H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1 } = H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and } \qquad 
 H_{c+1}eH_{c+1 } = H_{c+1}\quad\text{for}\   c\geq 0.$$ Similarly, as $ H_{c}e$ is a projective left $ H_{c}$-module, $ E_c$ will be a Morita equivalence if we prove that $ $ \label{morrat11 } 
 H_ceH_c = H_c \quad \text{for}\ c\geq 0.$$ Since $ \widetilde{S}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\circ S_{c}\circ E_{c}$, Equations   \[morrat1\ ] and \[morrat11\ ] will suffice to rise the theorem. 

 The validation of Theorem   \[morrat\ ] will be through a series of lemmas and we begin with the inaugural equality in. determine $ d = c+1 $; thus $ d\in { \mathbb{R}}_{\geq 1}$, with $ d\notin \frac{1}{2}+{\mathbb{Z}}$. 

 decrease to Category $ { \mathcal{O}}$ { # subsec-4.2 } 
 ------------------------------------- 

 If $ H_de_-H_d$ is a * proper * two - sided ideal of $ H_d$ it must be contained in a primitive ideal, and hence, by [ @ginz Generalized Duflo Theorem ], eliminate an aim from category $ \mathcal{O}_d$. Thus it is adequate to show that $ e_-$ does not annihilate any bare faculty belonging to $ \mathcal{O}_d$. 

 To do this we foremost show in Corollary   \[poono\ ] that the musical composition factors of $ \Delta_d(\mu)$ are of the form $ L_d(\lambda)$ for $ \lambda \leq \mu$. Under the $ { \mathbb{Z}}$-strings ordering such a result is prove in [ @guay ] but as we work with the dominance ordering of partitions and representation, as defined in, this definitely requires work, see besides. We then show that the lowest weight copy of the sign module for $ { { W}}$ in $ \Delta_d(\mu)$ does not happen in any standard faculty $ \Delta_d(\lambda)$ for $ \lambda < \mu$. Since $ L_d(\mu)$ is the headway (that is, the unique simple factor module) of $ \Delta _
rat1}
J_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and} \qquxd
H_{c+1}eH_{c+1} = H_{c+1}\quad\jezt{for}\  c\geq 0.$$ Similaruy, as $H_{c}e$ is a projective leht $H_{x}$-moduoe, $E_c$ will be a Morita equivalejce if ww price that $$\lausl{morrab11}
K_ceH_c = H_c \xnad \text{for}\ c\gea 0.$$ Since $\whdetilde{S}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\cisc S_{e}\circ E_{c}$, Equations \[morrat1\] and \[morrat11\] rill sugflce to prove tre tnqorej.

Nht proof of Theorem \[morrat\] will be fhrough a series of kemmas and we begin with tje flrst equality in. Sft $d=c+1$; thus $e\in {\iqthbb{R}}_{\geq 1}$, wkth $d\notin \frac{1}{2}+{\mathbb{Z}}$.

Teduction to Category ${\mathcal{O}}$ {#sjbsec-4.2}
-------------------------------------

Nf $H_de_-H_d$ is a *prlker* two-sided ideaj of $H_d$ it mmxt be wontainrd in a primitlve iveal, and hence, by [@ginz Geieralized Duflo Theotem], annihinace an object from catwgiry $\mdthcdl{O}_d$. Rhur iu ix snough to show that $e_-$ does not annihilate any simkle nodule belongjng to $\mwthcal{O}_d$.

To do this we first show in Cormllzry \[poono\] that the compowition factors of $\Delja_d(\mu)$ are jf the form $L_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambda \leq \mu$. Under the ${\kathbu{Z}}$-rtrnkns ofeeging such a result is proved in [@guay] but as wq wprl with the domlnance ordering of pwryytions and rekresentcfikns, as defined in, hhis desinitwly requiwes eork, see also. We then show rhat the lowvst qeight copy of the sign modulz for ${{E}}$ in $\Celta_d(\mu)$ does not occur in zny standarf module $\Sdlta_d(\lambda)$ for $\uamnda < \mu$. Since $L_d(\mu)$ is the heaq (that is, the unique simkle faceor module) of $\Dcnta_
rat1} H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and} \qquad H_{c+1}eH_{c+1} = H_{c+1}\quad\text{for}\ Similarly, $H_{c}e$ is projective left $H_{c}$-module, equivalence we prove that H_ceH_c = H_c \text{for}\ c\geq 0.$$ Since $\widetilde{S}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\circ S_{c}\circ Equations \[morrat1\] and \[morrat11\] will suffice to prove the theorem. The proof of \[morrat\] will be through a series of lemmas and we begin with the equality Set thus {\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 1}$, with $d\notin \frac{1}{2}+{\mathbb{Z}}$. Reduction to Category ${\mathcal{O}}$ {#subsec-4.2} ------------------------------------- If $H_de_-H_d$ is a *proper* ideal of $H_d$ it must be contained in primitive ideal, and hence, [@ginz Generalized Duflo Theorem], annihilate object category $\mathcal{O}_d$. it enough show that $e_-$ not annihilate any simple module belonging to $\mathcal{O}_d$. To do this we first show in Corollary \[poono\] the composition $\Delta_d(\mu)$ are the $L_d(\lambda)$ $\lambda \leq \mu$. ${\mathbb{Z}}$-strings ordering such a result is but as we work with the dominance ordering partitions and as defined in, this definitely requires see also. We then show that the lowest copy of the sign module for ${{W}}$ in $\Delta_d(\mu)$ does not occur in any standard for $\lambda < \mu$. $L_d(\mu)$ is the (that the simple module) of
rat1}
H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and} \qquAd
H_{c+1}eH_{c+1} = H_{c+1}\qUad\teXt{fOr}\  c\GeQ 0.$$ SimIlarLy, as $H_{c}e$ is a projECtivE left $H_{c}$-module, $E_c$ will be a moritA eQUivaLEnCe if wE prove tHAt $$\LABel{MoRrAt11}
H_Ceh_C = H_C \quad \TexT{for}\ c\geQ 0.$$ Since $\wideTilDe{s}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\circ S_{c}\ciRC E_{C}$, Equations \[MorRat1\] and \[morrat11\] WilL suffiCe To pROve thE thEorem.

the proOF of TheOrem \[morraT\] wILl be thROugh a seRIEs Of leMmas and we begin witH ThE First equality iN. Set $d=c+1$; ThUS $d\IN {\MatHbb{r}}_{\geq 1}$, with $d\nOtIn \fraC{1}{2}+{\Mathbb{Z}}$.

rEdUCTIon TO Category ${\mathCal{O}}$ {#subsec-4.2}
-------------------------------------

IF $h_de_-h_d$ is a *pRoPer* TWo-sideD ideaL oF $h_d$ iT must be contAineD in a primiTive idEAl, and heNCe, by [@ginZ GenerAliZed duflO thEoRem], AnNIhiLAtE an OBjeCt from caTeGoRy $\matHcal{o}_D$. tHUs it Is eNougH to shOw that $e_-$ does noT anNihiLAte Any siMple mOdulE bElongIng to $\mAthcaL{O}_D$.

To do this we firsT shoW in CorollAry \[PoOno\] ThAt the COmposiTioN faCtors of $\delta_d(\mU)$ Are Of THE FoRm $L_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambdA \lEQ \Mu$. under the ${\Mathbb{z}}$-StRiNGs orderiNg SucH a reSULt is pRoveD In [@Guay] but aS we worK WiTh The domiNaNce ordErIng Of pArtitIOns aNd reprEsentatiOns, as DEfined in, this deFInitely requirES wORK, sEE alsO. We Then show thaT the LOwesT weiGHt CopY Of the Sign mOdULe FOr ${{W}}$ in $\Delta_d(\mu)$ does noT oCcur in Any stAndard module $\DElta_d(\lambdA)$ FOR $\lambda < \mU$. SinCE $L_D(\Mu)$ is the head (thaT is, thE unique simPLe factor ModulE) of $\Delta_
rat1}
H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H _{c+1}\qqu ad\te xt{ and }\qqu ad
H _{c+1}eH_{c+1} = H_ {c+1}\quad\text{for}\ c\ge q0 .$$S im ilarl y, as $ H _{ c } e$is  a  pr oj e ct ive l eft  $H_{c} $-module,$E_ c$  will be a M o ri ta equival enc e if we prov e t hat $$ \l abe l {morr at1 1}
H_ ceH_c=  H_c \ quad \tex t{ f or}\ c \ geq 0.$ $ Si nce$\widetilde{S}_{c } =E ^ {-1}_{c+1}\cir c S_{c }\ c ir c E_{ c}$ , Equation s\[mor r at1\] a n d\ [ m orr a t11\] will su ffice to pr o vethe th eo rem . 

Theproof  o f  Th eorem \[mor rat\ ] will be  throu g h a ser i es of l emmasand  we  beg i nwi thth e  fi r st  eq u ali ty in. S et  $ d=c+1 $; t h u s $d\i n { \mat hbb{R }}_{\geq 1}$,  wi th $ d \no tin \ frac{ 1}{2 }+ {\mat hbb{Z} }$.
Re duction to Cate gory  ${\mathc al{ O} }${# subse c -4.2}--- --- ------- ------- - --- -- - - - -- ------

If $H_de_- H_ d $  i s a *pro per* t w o- si d ed ideal  o f $ H_d$ i t mus t be co ntainedin a p r im it ive ide al , andhe nce , b y [@g i nz G eneral ized Duf lo Th e orem], annihil a te an objectf ro m ca t egor y $ \mathcal{O} _d$. Thus  iti seno u gh to  show  t h at $e_-$ does not anni hi late a ny si mple module b elonging t o $ \mathcal {O}_ d $. 
To do this we  firs t show inC orollary  \[po ono\] th at the co m p ositionfac tor s o f $ \ D el ta_d(\mu)$ ar e of t he  form $ L_d (\lambd a)$  fo r $ \la mb da \leq \ mu$. Und er  t he  $ {\m athbb { Z}}$-str in gsor der ing s u ch a r esult  ispr ov e d i n [@gua y ]b u t as  w ework  wi th  thedomi n anc e order ing of pa rti t ions  a nd  repres entations, as  d efined in,  t his  defin i t ely requ ires work, see also. We then sh owthatthelowest we igh t copy  of the si gn mod ule f or  ${ { W }}$ i n $\ Del ta _d(\mu)$ d o e s n ot oc cu r in  any st andard module $\De l ta_ d(\lambda)$ f or$\la m b da  <\ mu $ . S in c e $ L _ d(\mu)$ is thehead (that  i s ,the unique sim pl e facto r modul e) of $\Delta _
rat1}
H_{c+1}e_-H_{c+1} =H_{c+1}\qquad\text{and}_\qquad
H_{c+1}eH_{c+1} =_H_{c+1}\quad\text{for}\  c\geq 0.$$_Similarly, as_$H_{c}e$_is a_projective_left $H_{c}$-module, $E_c$_will be a_Morita equivalence if we_prove that $$\label{morrat11}
H_ceH_c_=_H_c \quad \text{for}\ c\geq 0.$$ Since $\widetilde{S}_{c}=E^{-1}_{c+1}\circ S_{c}\circ E_{c}$, Equations \[morrat1\] and \[morrat11\] will suffice_to_prove the_theorem.

The_proof_of Theorem \[morrat\] will be through_a series of lemmas and_we begin_with the first equality in. Set $d=c+1$; thus_$d\in_{\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 1}$, with_$d\notin \frac{1}{2}+{\mathbb{Z}}$.

Reduction to Category ${\mathcal{O}}$ {#subsec-4.2}
-------------------------------------

If $H_de_-H_d$ is a_*proper* two-sided ideal of $H_d$ it_must be contained_in_a_primitive ideal, and hence,_by [@ginz Generalized Duflo Theorem], annihilate_an object from category $\mathcal{O}_d$. Thus_it is enough to show that $e_-$_does not annihilate any simple module_belonging to $\mathcal{O}_d$.

To do this_we first_show in Corollary \[poono\] that the_composition factors of_$\Delta_d(\mu)$ are_of the form_$L_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambda \leq \mu$. Under_the ${\mathbb{Z}}$-strings ordering_such a result is proved in_[@guay]_but as we_work_with_the dominance_ordering of partitions_and_representations, as_defined_in, this definitely requires work, see_also._We then show that the lowest weight_copy of the sign_module_for ${{W}}$ in $\Delta_d(\mu)$_does not occur in any_standard module $\Delta_d(\lambda)$ for $\lambda <_\mu$. Since_$L_d(\mu)$ is_the head (that is, the unique simple factor module) of $\Delta_