{C}}^{2\times
  2})$ for some $p>2$, and $$\begin{aligned}
  W_2:=\gamma(1 + \sigma_2\beta)\sigma_2
  \tfrac{k}{x}-\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\sigma_3
  \tfrac{\theta'}{2}=\Big((\gamma-1)+\gamma \beta \sigma_2\Big)
\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\sigma_3
  \tfrac{\theta'}{2}.\end{aligned}$$ Due to the support properties of $A_2$ (recall that $\beta=A_2/V$ and $\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$), the function $W_2$ is supported away from zero. In addition, observe that $W_2$ is uniformly bounded and hence $$\begin{aligned}
\label{i2a}
  \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ According to Corollary \[corol2\] (from Section \[last\]) $W_1$ is an infinitesimally small perturbation with respect to $\tilde h_k -W=
\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +V_2/\gamma$ and therefore $$\begin{aligned}
\label{i2}
  \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ Let us define the self-adjoint operator $$h_0:=\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +V_2/\gamma$$ with domain, $\mathcal{D}(h_0)$, given by for $\alpha=0$. We can compare the resolvents of $\tilde{h}_k-W$ and
{ C}}^{2\times 
   2})$ for some $ p>2 $, and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   W_2:=\gamma(1 + \sigma_2\beta)\sigma_2 
   \tfrac{k}{x}-\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x } + \sigma_3 
   \tfrac{\theta'}{2}=\Big((\gamma-1)+\gamma \beta \sigma_2\Big) 
 \sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x } + \sigma_3 
   \tfrac{\theta'}{2}.\end{aligned}$$ Due to the support properties of $ A_2 $ (recall that $ \beta = A_2 / V$ and $ \gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$), the function $ W_2 $ is back aside from zero. In addition, observe that $ W_2 $ is uniformly bounded and therefore $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{i2a } 
   \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1 } \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k - W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1 } \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ According to Corollary \[corol2\ ] (from Section \[last\ ]) $ W_1 $ is an infinitesimally small perturbation with deference to $ \tilde h_k -W= 
 \sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) + \sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x } + V_2/\gamma$ and therefore $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{i2 } 
   \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k - W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1 } \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k - W-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1 } \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ Let us specify the self - adjoint operator $ $ h_0:=\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) + V_2/\gamma$$ with domain, $ \mathcal{D}(h_0)$, give by for $ \alpha=0$. We can compare the resolvents of $ \tilde{h}_k - W$ and
{C}}^{2\tiles
  2})$ for some $p>2$, and $$\begln{aligned}
  W_2:=\gammc(1 + \sigme_2\beta)\sifma_2
  \tfrxc{k}{x}-\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\sigma_3
  \tfrar{\thera'}{2}=\Big((\tamma-1)+\gamma \beta \sigma_2\Bkg)
\sigma_2\tfgac{k}{x} +\signa_3
  \ufrac{\theta'}{2}.\end{aligisd}$$ Due bj ths sup'oct properties on $A_2$ (recall dhat $\beta=A_2/V$ ang $\ealma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$), the function $W_2$ is supported away ftol zero. In addijion, pfserbv uhat $W_2$ is uniformly bounded and hsnce $$\bejin{aligned}
\label{o2a}
  \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\matjrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \hig\| \mathbbm{1}_{U}(\tilqw{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \cig\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ Accotding to Corollary \[corol2\] (from Seztion \[last\]) $W_1$ is ab ijxinitesimaloy smwll perturbabpon witv respevt to $\tilde h_k -W=
\smgma_1(-{\nathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +\sigma_2\vfrac{k}{x} +V_2/\gamma$ and trerefore $$\teyin{aligned}
\label{i2}
  \big\| \mqthbbk{1}_{I}(\tinde{h}_y-Q_2-{\maghrj{i\,}})^{-1} \bjg\|_{\rm{HS}}{\peqalant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tiode{h}_k-W-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{NS}}.\qbd{aligned}$$ Let us desige the self-adjoint operator $$h_0:=\sigma_1(-{\mathrk{i\,}}\pzrtial_x) +V_2/\gamma$$ with domqin, $\mathcal{D}(h_0)$, given bi for $\alphw=0$. We can compare the resolvents of $\tilde{h}_k-W$ and
{C}}^{2\times 2})$ for some $p>2$, and $$\begin{aligned} \sigma_2\beta)\sigma_2 +\sigma_3 \tfrac{\theta'}{2}=\Big((\gamma-1)+\gamma \sigma_2\Big) \sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\sigma_3 properties $A_2$ (recall that and $\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$), the $W_2$ is supported away from zero. addition, observe that $W_2$ is uniformly bounded and hence $$\begin{aligned} \label{i2a} \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ According to Corollary \[corol2\] (from Section \[last\]) $W_1$ is an small with to h_k -W= \sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +V_2/\gamma$ and therefore $$\begin{aligned} \label{i2} \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ Let define the self-adjoint operator $$h_0:=\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +V_2/\gamma$$ with domain, given by for $\alpha=0$. can compare the resolvents of and
{C}}^{2\times
  2})$ for some $p>2$, and $$\begin{aliGned}
  W_2:=\gamma(1 + \Sigma_2\BetA)\siGmA_2
  \tfrAc{k}{x}-\Sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\siGMa_3
  \tfRac{\theta'}{2}=\Big((\gamma-1)+\gamma \bEta \siGmA_2\big)
\sIGmA_2\tfraC{k}{x} +\sigmA_3
  \TfRAC{\thEtA'}{2}.\eNd{aLiGNeD}$$ Due tO thE supporT propertieS of $a_2$ (rEcall that $\betA=a_2/V$ And $\gamma=(1-\beTa^2)^{-1/2}$), tHe function $W_2$ iS suPporteD aWay FRom zeRo. IN addiTion, obSErve thAt $W_2$ is unifOrMLy bounDEd and heNCE $$\bEgin{Aligned}
\label{i2a}
  \big\| \MAtHBbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\matHrm{i\,}})^{-1} \biG\|_{\rM{hS}}{\LEQslAnt}C \big\| \mathbbM{1}_{I}(\Tilde{H}_K-W_2-{\mathrM{I\,}})^{-1} \bIG\|_{\RM{HS}}.\ENd{aligned}$$ AccoRding to CoroLLarY \[corol2\] (FrOm SECtion \[lAst\]) $W_1$ iS aN InfInitesimallY smaLl perturbAtion wITh respeCT to $\tildE h_k -W=
\siGma_1(-{\MatHrm{i\,}}\PArTiAl_x) +\SiGMa_2\tFRaC{k}{x} +v_2/\GamMa$ and theReFoRe $$\begIn{alIGNED}
\labEl{i2}
  \Big\| \mAthbbM{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\matHrm{I\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\RM{HS}}{\LeqslAnt}c \bIg\| \maThBbm{1}_{I}(\tIlde{h}_k-w-{\mathRm{I\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligNed}$$ LEt us definE thE sElf-AdJoint OPeratoR $$h_0:=\sIgmA_1(-{\mathrm{I\,}}\partiaL_X) +V_2/\gAmMA$$ WItH domain, $\mathcal{D}(h_0)$, giVeN BY fOr $\alpha=0$. WE can coMPaRe THe resolvEnTs oF $\tilDE{H}_k-W$ anD
{C}}^{2\times
  2})$ for s ome $p>2$,  and$$\ beg in {ali gned }
  W_2:=\gamm a (1 +  \sigma_2\beta)\sigma_ 2
  \ tf r ac{k } {x }-\si gma_2\t f ra c { k}{ x}  + \si gm a _3 
  \t fra c{\thet a'}{2}=\Bi g(( \g amma-1)+\gam m a\beta \sig ma_ 2\Big)
\sigm a_2 \tfrac {k }{x }  +\si gma _3
 \tfrac { \theta '}{2}.\en d{ a ligned } $$ Duet o  t he s upport properties of $A_2$ (recallthat $ \b e ta = A _2/ V$and $\gamm a= (1-\b e ta^2)^{ - 1/ 2 } $ ),t he function $ W_2$ is sup p ort ed awa yfro m  zero.  In a dd i tio n, observethat  $W_2$ is  unifo r mly bou n ded and  hence  $$ \be gin{ a li gn ed} 
\ l abe l {i 2a}   \ big\| \m at hb bm{1} _{I} ( \ t i lde{ h}_ k-{\ mathr m{i\,}})^{-1}  \b ig\| _ {\r m{HS} }{\le qsla nt }c \b ig\| \ mathb bm {1}_{I}(\tilde{ h}_k -W_2-{\ma thr m{ i\, }} )^{-1 }  \big\ |_{ \rm {HS}}.\ end{ali g ned }$ $ A cc ording to Corollar y\ [ co rol2\] ( from S e ct io n  \[last\ ])  $W _1$i s  an i nfin i te simallysmallp er tu rbation  w ith re sp ect  to  $\ti l de h _k -W= 
\sigma_ 1(-{\ m athrm{i\,}}\pa r tial_x) +\sig m a_ 2 \ tf r ac{k }{x } +V_2/\gam ma$a nd t here f or e $ $ \begi n{ali gn e d} \label{i2}
  \big\|  \ mathbb m{1}_ {I}(\tilde{h} _k-W_2-{\m a t h rm{i\,}} )^{- 1 }\ big\|_{\rm{HS} }{\le qslant}c \ b ig\| \ma thbbm {1}_{I}( \tilde{h} _ k -W-{\mat hrm {i\ ,}} )^{ - 1 }\big\|_{\rm{H S } }.\e nd {aligne d}$ $ Let u s d efi nethe  s elf-adjoi nt opera to r$$ h_ 0:= \sigm a _1(-{\ma th rm{ i\ ,}} \part i al_x)+V_2/ \gam ma $$ wit h domai n ,$ \ math ca l{ D}(h _0) $,  give n by for  $\alph a=0$. Wecan comp ar ethe res olvents of $\ ti lde{h}_k-W $and 
{C}}^{2\times
 _2})$ for_some $p>2$, and $$\begin{aligned}
_ W_2:=\gamma(1_+_\sigma_2\beta)\sigma_2
 _\tfrac{k}{x}-\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x}_+\sigma_3
  \tfrac{\theta'}{2}=\Big((\gamma-1)+\gamma_\beta \sigma_2\Big)
\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x} +\sigma_3
_ \tfrac{\theta'}{2}.\end{aligned}$$ Due to_the support properties_of_$A_2$ (recall that $\beta=A_2/V$ and $\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$), the function $W_2$ is supported away from zero._In_addition, observe_that_$W_2$_is uniformly bounded and hence_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{i2a}
  \big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c_\big\| \mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1}_\big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$ According to Corollary \[corol2\] (from Section \[last\])_$W_1$_is an infinitesimally_small perturbation with respect to $\tilde h_k -W=
\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +\sigma_2\tfrac{k}{x}_+V_2/\gamma$ and therefore $$\begin{aligned}
\label{i2}
  \big\|_\mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W_2-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1} \big\|_{\rm{HS}}{\leqslant}c \big\|_\mathbbm{1}_{I}(\tilde{h}_k-W-{\mathrm{i\,}})^{-1}_\big\|_{\rm{HS}}.\end{aligned}$$_Let us define the_self-adjoint operator $$h_0:=\sigma_1(-{\mathrm{i\,}}\partial_x) +V_2/\gamma$$ with domain,_$\mathcal{D}(h_0)$, given by for $\alpha=0$. We_can compare the resolvents of $\tilde{h}_k-W$ and