aligned}$$ We use $f$ instead of $s$ in these formulas since most of the simulations in the following will use fixed $f$.

As we have seen in the last Section, the Lyapunov exponents from the three gates are apparently indistinguishable at small enough $\epsilon$. A very useful simplification therefore is to ignore the distinction between the gates and model the Lyapunov exponent as if there were only two regions, the gate (or periodic) region and the outside (or chaotic) region. In addition, Fig. 9 suggests that a reasonable model of the channel region is to assume that the discontinuous entrance rate is uniform. This last simplification is only possible for small enough $f$, the entrance rate in the complete tangency channels being far from uniform. These assumptions will allow us to construct a very simple model of the $\epsilon$ dependence of the Lyapunov exponents. The choice of $f=0.1$ to separate the two regions is arbitrary. A smaller value would result in an even more uniform entrance rate than Fig. 9; however, one would also loose statistics because of the smaller gate size. As we will see, the gate fraction $f$ will be used to formally separate the outside and inside gate Lyapunov exponent behaviors.

A new aspect of modeling the actual gates of the logistic map is the fact that the entrance to the gates can be from flow further up the channel or from a completely disjoint part of the map. These possibilities were termed the continuous and discontinuous routes in the last Section. One may show that the continuous entrances occur within a scaled distance of $\sim f/2 +2a\epsilon/f$ from the lower limit ($-1$) of the integrals in Eqs.(\[huh\]) and (\[blaa\]). In Fig. 9 this contribution would extend about halfway through the first (deleted) bin. Since these entrances always occur in a narrow range of the integrations in these equations for the range of $\epsilon$ considered, it is reasonable to model this contribution by a Dirac delta function located at the lower limit, ${\hat
y}=-1$. In addition, we saw in Fig. 9 that the discontinuous part of the entrance rate was approximately uniform. Thus we will model the entrance rate with $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dN({\hat y})}{d{\hat y}}=2N_{c}\delta({\hat y}+1) + \frac{dN_{d}}{d{\hat y
aligned}$$ We use $ f$ instead of $ s$ in these formulas since most of the simulations in the pursuit will practice fixate $ f$. 

 As we have seen in the final department, the Lyapunov exponents from the three gates are obviously indistinguishable at small enough $ \epsilon$. A very useful reduction consequently is to ignore the distinction between the gate and model the Lyapunov exponent as if there were merely two regions, the gate (or periodic) region and the outside (or chaotic) region. In addition, Fig.   9 propose that a reasonable model of the channel area is to assume that the discontinuous entrance rate is consistent. This last reduction is only potential for small enough $ f$, the entrance rate in the complete tangency channel being far from uniform. These assumptions will allow us to construct a very simple model of the $ \epsilon$ addiction of the Lyapunov advocate. The choice of $ f=0.1 $ to separate the two regions is arbitrary. A smaller value would result in an even more uniform entrance rate than Fig.   9; however, one would also loose statistic because of the modest gate size. As we will see, the gate fraction $ f$ will be use to formally classify the outside and inside gate Lyapunov exponent behaviors. 

 A new aspect of modeling the actual gates of the logistic function is the fact that the entrance to the gates can be from flow further up the channel or from a completely disjoint part of the map. These possibilities were termed the continuous and discontinuous routes in the last Section. One may usher that the continuous entrances happen within a scale distance of $ \sim f/2 +2a\epsilon / f$ from the lower limit ($ -1 $) of the integrals in Eqs.(\[huh\ ]) and (\[blaa\ ]). In Fig.   9 this contribution would extend about halfway through the inaugural (deleted) bin. Since these entrances always happen in a narrow image of the integrations in these equations for the stove of $ \epsilon$ considered, it is fair to model this contribution by a Dirac delta function located at the lower limit, $ { \hat 
 y}=-1$. In addition, we examine in Fig.   9 that the discontinuous part of the entrance rate was approximately consistent. Thus we will model the entrance rate with $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{dN({\hat y})}{d{\hat y}}=2N_{c}\delta({\hat y}+1) + \frac{dN_{d}}{d{\hat y
alihned}$$ We use $f$ instead of $s$ in these formulas smnce moat of thd simulations in the followiig wull uwe fixed $f$.

As we have sden in thv last Sextioi, the Lyapunov eelonents from fme thxex gates are appsrently ingistinguishabla xt small enough $\epsilon$. A very useful simpligifation therefote is eo ifnore the distinction between the fates aid model the Lyspunov exponent as if therf wege only two regiond, the gate (ir pqeiodic) regiov and the outside (or cgaotic) region. In addition, Fig. 9 sjggescs that a rgcwonwtle model oh the bhannel regiok is to assume that the discpntmnuoys entrance rate is uiiform. This last simklificatiot ns only possible for wmqll etougv $f$, gye dntdaice rate ln vhe complets tangency xhannels being far grjn uniform. Theae asstm[tions will allow us to construct a verj sijple model of the $\epsilin$ dependence of the Pyapunov qxponents. The choice of $f=0.1$ to separate the two reghons ms arylbrarh. A smaller value would result in an even more ugjfprk entrance ratc than Fig. 9; however, oje rould also louse stcfiatics because of tje smaljer gqte size. Ws wr will see, the gate fractiob $f$ will be lsed to formally separcte the outsnde anc insode gate Lyapunov exponznt begaviors.

A nea aspect kw modeling the aztusl gates of the logistic map is the fect tkat the dntrsnce tj the gated can be from flow furthfr up tve channel or from a completely disjoint 'ert of the mak. Tvesv possibijitiex were termed the continuoux and dnscontknuous rounes in thx last Sectijn. One may shma that the cmntinuouf enrranxes occjf within a scaked distauee of $\sim f/2 +2a\epsilon/f$ from bhe luser limit ($-1$) of tkt ibtegrals in Eqs.(\[nuh\]) anq (\[hlea\]). In Xig. 9 this condribjtium wouud extend anoug hakfway through the fisst (seleted) bin. Since yhcse entrabces alwwys occur in s narrow range of uhe invegratmons im trese equations for the range or $\epsilon$ coksidered, it if reqsonable to kodel this contribution by a Dirac delte function located at jhe lower limit, ${\hat
y}=-1$. Nn addition, wx saw yn Fig. 9 thdt the discontinuous part of the entrsnce rate was approxijately uniflrm. Thus we will model the entrance rate with $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dN({\hat y})}{d{\hat y}}=2N_{c}\delta({\hat y}+1) + \frzc{dN_{c}}{d{\hat y
aligned}$$ We use $f$ instead of $s$ formulas most of simulations in the As have seen in last Section, the exponents from the three gates are indistinguishable at small enough $\epsilon$. A very useful simplification therefore is to ignore distinction between the gates and model the Lyapunov exponent as if there were two the (or region and the outside (or chaotic) region. In addition, Fig. 9 suggests that a reasonable model the channel region is to assume that the entrance rate is uniform. last simplification is only possible small $f$, the rate the tangency channels being from uniform. These assumptions will allow us to construct a very simple model of the $\epsilon$ dependence the Lyapunov choice of to the regions is arbitrary. value would result in an even rate than Fig. 9; however, one would also statistics because the smaller gate size. As we see, the gate fraction $f$ will be used formally separate the outside and inside gate Lyapunov exponent behaviors. A new aspect of modeling gates of the logistic is the fact the to gates be from further up the channel or from a completely disjoint part of map. These possibilities were termed the continuous and discontinuous routes last One may show the continuous entrances occur a distance of $\sim f/2 the limit integrals Eqs.(\[huh\]) (\[blaa\]). In Fig. 9 contribution would extend about halfway the first (deleted) bin. in a narrow range of the integrations in equations for the range of $\epsilon$ considered, is reasonable to model this contribution by a Dirac delta function located the lower y}=-1$. In addition, we saw in Fig. 9 the discontinuous part of entrance rate was approximately uniform. Thus we will model entrance with $$\begin{aligned} y})}{d{\hat y}}=2N_{c}\delta({\hat y}+1) \frac{dN_{d}}{d{\hat y
aligned}$$ We use $f$ instead of $s$ in These formuLas siNce MosT oF the SimuLations in the foLLowiNg will use fixed $f$.

As we havE seen In THe laST SEctioN, the LyaPUnOV ExpOnEnTs fRoM ThE threE gaTes are aPparently iNdiStInguishable aT SmAll enough $\ePsiLon$. A very usefUl sImplifIcAtiON therEfoRe is tO ignorE The disTinction bEtWEen the GAtes and MODeL the lyapunov exponent aS If THere were only twO regioNs, THe GATe (oR peRiodic) regiOn And thE Outside (OR cHAOTic) REgion. In additiOn, Fig. 9 suggesTS thAt a reaSoNabLE model Of the ChANneL region is to AssuMe that the DisconTInuous eNTrance rAte is uNifOrm. this LAsT sImpLiFIcaTIoN is ONly Possible FoR sMall eNougH $F$, THE entRanCe raTe in tHe complete tanGenCy chANneLs beiNg far From UnIform. these aSsumpTiOns will allow us tO conStruct a veRy sImPle MoDel of THe $\epsiLon$ DepEndence Of the LyAPunOv EXPOnEnts. The choice of $f=0.1$ to SePARaTe the two RegionS Is ArBItrary. A sMaLleR valUE Would ResuLT iN an even mOre uniFOrM eNtrance RaTe than fiG. 9; hoWevEr, one WOuld Also loOse statiStics BEcause of the smaLLer gate size. As WE wILL sEE, the GatE fraction $f$ wIll bE Used To foRMaLly SEparaTe the OuTSiDE and inside gate LyapuNoV exponEnt beHaviors.

A new asPect of modeLING the actuAl gaTEs OF the logistic maP is thE fact that tHE entrancE to thE gates caN be from flOW Further uP thE chAnnEl oR FRoM a completely dISJoinT pArt of thE maP. These pOssIbiLitIes WeRe termed tHe continUoUs AnD dIscOntinUOus routeS iN thE lAst sectiON. One maY show That ThE cONtiNuous enTRaNCEs ocCuR wIthiN a sCaLed diStanCE of $\Sim f/2 +2a\epSilon/f$ froM thE LoweR lImIt ($-1$) of the Integrals in EqS.(\[hUh\]) and (\[blaa\]). IN FIg. 9 tHis conTRIbution wOuld extend about halfway tHRough thE fiRst (deLeteD) bin. Since TheSe entrAncES alwayS occur In a naRrOw rANGe of tHE InTegRaTions in theSE EquAtionS fOr thE range oF $\epsilon$ considered, IT is Reasonable to mOdeL thiS COnTriBUtIOn bY a dIraC DElta function locAted at the lOwER lImit, ${\hat
y}=-1$. In ADdiTiOn, we saw In Fig. 9 thAt the DIscontiNuous part Of the entrAnCe raTE Was ApproximatEly unifoRm. Thus we wILl modEL tHe entRanCe rate WiTh $$\bEgin{aLigned}
\FRac{DN({\hat Y})}{d{\hat y}}=2n_{c}\Delta({\hAt y}+1) + \frAc{DN_{d}}{d{\hat y
aligned}$$ We use $f$ inst ead of $s$  in t hes e f or mula s si nce most of th e  sim ulations in the follow ing w il l  use fi xed $ f$.

As we h ave  s ee n i nt he  last  Se ction,the Lyapun ovex ponents from th e three ga tes  are apparen tly  indis ti ngu i shabl e a t sma ll eno u gh $\e psilon$.Av ery us e ful sim p l if icat ion therefore ist oi gnore the dist inctio nb et w e enthe  gates and  m odelt he Lyap u no v e xpo n ent as if the re were onl y  tw o regi on s,t he gat e (or  p e rio dic) region  and  the outs ide (o r  chaoti c ) regio n. Inadd iti on,F ig .9 s ug g est s  t hat a r easonabl emo del o f th e c h anne l r egio n isto assume tha t t he d i sco ntinu ous e ntra nc e rat e is u nifor m.  This last simp lifi cation is  on ly  po ss iblef or sma lleno ugh $f$ , the e n tra nc e r at e in the completeta n g en cy chann els be i ng  f a r from u ni for m. T h e se as sump t io ns willallowu sto  constr uc t a ve ry  si mpl e mod e l of  the $ \epsilon $ dep e ndence of theL yapunov expon e nt s .  T h e ch oic e of $f=0.1 $ to sepa rate th e t w o reg ionsis ar b itrary. A smaller v al ue wou ld re sult in an ev en more un i f o rm entra ncer at e  than Fig. 9;howev er, one wo u ld alsoloose  statist ics becau s e  of thesma lle r g ate s iz e. As we will s ee,th e gatefra ction $ f$wil l b e u se d to form ally sep ar at eth e o utsid e  and ins id e g at e L yapun o v expo nentbeha vi or s .
A new a s pe c t  ofmo de ling  th eactua l ga t esof thelogisticmap is t he  f act tha t the entranc eto the gat es  ca n be f r o m flow f urther up the channel o r  from a  co mplet elydisjointpar t of t hem ap. Th ese po ssibi li tie s weret e rm edth e continuo u s  an d dis co ntin uous ro utes in the last S e cti on. One may s how  tha t th e c o nt i nuo us ent r a nces occur with in a scale dd is tance of $ \ sim  f /2 +2a\ epsilon /f$ f r om thelower lim it ($-1$)  o f th e int egrals inEqs.(\[h uh\]) and (\[bl a a\ ]). I n F ig. 9th iscontr ibutio n  wo uld e xtendab out ha lfway  t hrough t he first (deleted) bin.  Since  thes e e ntrancesalw a ysoccur ina na rrow range  of  th e int egr a tions  int he see quati onsf or the ra n ge  of $ \e psilon$ con s i d ere d, it  is reason able  to model this co n tribution by a  Dir a c  de lta func ti on located atthe  l o w er limit ,${\hat
y}=- 1$. In a dd i tion,  we sa w in F ig. 9 t h a tt he dis cont inu ous partofth e  entran ce  r a te was  app ro ximate ly uni f orm. T hus we will mode l the e ntran c e r ate w it h $$\be g in{a ligned}
\f rac{dN({\ha t y})} {d{\ hat y }}=2N_{ c} \delta ({\ ha t y}+1) +\ frac{dN_{ d}}{d {\hat y 
aligned}$$ We_use $f$_instead of $s$ in_these formulas_since_most of_the_simulations in the_following will use_fixed $f$.

As we have_seen in the_last_Section, the Lyapunov exponents from the three gates are apparently indistinguishable at small enough_$\epsilon$._A very_useful_simplification_therefore is to ignore the_distinction between the gates and_model the_Lyapunov exponent as if there were only two_regions,_the gate (or_periodic) region and the outside (or chaotic) region. In_addition, Fig. 9 suggests that a reasonable_model of the_channel_region_is to assume that_the discontinuous entrance rate is uniform._This last simplification is only possible_for small enough $f$, the entrance rate_in the complete tangency channels being_far from uniform. These assumptions_will allow_us to construct a very_simple model of_the $\epsilon$_dependence of the_Lyapunov exponents. The choice of $f=0.1$_to separate the_two regions is arbitrary. A smaller_value_would result in_an_even_more uniform_entrance rate than_Fig. 9;_however, one_would_also loose statistics because of the_smaller_gate size. As we will see, the_gate fraction $f$ will_be_used to formally separate_the outside and inside gate_Lyapunov exponent behaviors.

A new aspect of_modeling the_actual gates_of the logistic map is the fact that the entrance to_the gates can be from flow_further up the channel_or from_a_completely disjoint part_of_the map._These possibilities were termed the continuous and_discontinuous routes_in the last Section. One may_show that the continuous_entrances_occur within a scaled distance of_$\sim f/2 +2a\epsilon/f$ from the lower_limit ($-1$) of the integrals_in_Eqs.(\[huh\])_and (\[blaa\]). In Fig. 9 this_contribution would extend about halfway through_the first (deleted)_bin. Since these entrances always occur in_a_narrow range of the integrations in_these_equations for the range of $\epsilon$_considered,_it_is reasonable to model this_contribution by a Dirac delta function_located at the lower limit, ${\hat
y}=-1$. In addition, we_saw in Fig. 9_that the discontinuous part of_the_entrance_rate was approximately uniform. Thus we will model the entrance_rate with_$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dN({\hat y})}{d{\hat y}}=2N_{c}\delta({\hat_y}+1) + \frac{dN_{d}}{d{\hat y