beta/k^2}
{\eta( k^2 + \kappa^2[\omega])},
\label{conmem}$$ where we have introduced $\kappa[\omega]$ whose square is defined as $$\kappa^2[\omega] = \frac{2\eta_{\rm s}[\omega]}{\eta h} 
+ \frac{i \omega \rho}{\eta}.
\label{sqscreen}$$

In the limit of $\omega \rightarrow 0$, eq. (\[genoseen\]) reduces to the static mobility tensor obtained in ref. [@sanoop-poly-11]. The free membrane case was originally considered by Saffman and Delbrück [@saffman-75; @saffman-76], and the relevant length scale is the Saffman-Delbrück length $\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ beyond which the membrane feels the presence of the outer solvent. On the other hand, the confined membrane case corresponds to that of a supported membrane close to the substrate as considered by Evans and Sackmann [@evans-88] and later generalized by us [@SRK11]. Here the corresponding hydrodynamic screening length is set by the geometric mean of the Saffman-Delbrück length $\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ and the distance $h$ between the membrane and the wall, i.e., $\sqrt{\eta h/\eta_{\rm s}}$ [@SA98]. Notice that the presence of the second wall only doubles the screening effect. In the following, we shall mainly consider the confined membrane case which allows us to treat most of the calculations analytically. This is mainly because $\kappa[\omega]$ does not depend on $k$. However, it should be noted that the limiting expression of eq. (\[conmem\]) gives a reasonable approximation to the full expression of eq. (\[genoseen\]) even for $h \sim \eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ at least for a large enough moving object [@SA98; @RKSI11].

Concerning the viscoelasticity of the surrounding solvent, we assume that its complex modulus obeys the power-law behavior such that $G_{\rm s}[\omega]=G_0(i \omega)^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha < 1$, as generally argued by Granek [@granek-11]. This behavior is commonly observed for various polymeric solutions at high frequencies. Examples are $\alpha=1/2
beta / k^2 } 
 { \eta (k^2 + \kappa^2[\omega ]) }, 
 \label{conmem}$$ where we have introduced $ \kappa[\omega]$ whose square is defined as $ $ \kappa^2[\omega ] = \frac{2\eta_{\rm s}[\omega]}{\eta h } 
 + \frac{i \omega \rho}{\eta }. 
 \label{sqscreen}$$ 

 In the limit of $ \omega \rightarrow 0 $, eq.   (\[genoseen\ ]) dilute to the inactive mobility tensor obtained in ref.   [ @sanoop - poly-11 ]. The free membrane lawsuit was originally considered by Saffman and Delbrück   [ @saffman-75; @saffman-76 ], and the relevant distance plate is the Saffman - Delbrück length $ \eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ beyond which the membrane feels the presence of the outer solvent. On the early hand, the confined membrane case corresponds to that of a corroborate membrane close to the substrate as considered by Evans and Sackmann   [ @evans-88 ] and later generalized by us   [ @SRK11 ]. Here the corresponding hydrodynamic cover length is set by the geometric mean of the Saffman - Delbrück length $ \eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ and the distance $ h$ between the membrane and the rampart, i.e., $ \sqrt{\eta h/\eta_{\rm s}}$   [ @SA98 ]. Notice that the presence of the second wall only doubles the cover effect. In the pursuit, we shall mainly consider the confined membrane case which permit us to treat most of the calculations analytically. This is mainly because $ \kappa[\omega]$ does not depend on $ k$. However, it should be noted that the specify expression of eq.   (\[conmem\ ]) gives a reasonable approximation to the full expression of eq.   (\[genoseen\ ]) even for $ h \sim \eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ at least for a large enough moving aim   [ @SA98; @RKSI11 ]. 

 refer the viscoelasticity of the surrounding solution, we wear that its complex modulus obey the power - law behavior such that $ G_{\rm s}[\omega]=G_0(i \omega)^{\alpha}$ with $ \alpha < 1 $, as generally argued by Granek   [ @granek-11 ]. This behavior is commonly observed for diverse polymeric solutions at high frequencies. Examples are $ \alpha=1/2
betw/k^2}
{\eta( k^2 + \kappa^2[\omega])},
\label{gonmem}$$ where we kqve invroduces $\kappa[\ooega]$ whose square is defined aw $$\kapkc^2[\omega] = \frac{2\eta_{\rm s}[\ooega]}{\eta h} 
+ \frac{i \imege \rho}{\eta}.
\label{sqsrdeen}$$

In bke lijlt of $\imega \rightarrpw 0$, eq. (\[genoveen\]) reduces tm ghz static mobility tensor obtained in ref. [@sanpoo-poly-11]. The free memnwane bawe was originally considered gy Saffkan and Delbrüvk [@saffman-75; @saffman-76], and the gelegant length scale ls the Saffnan-Dqobrück length $\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ beyond whidh the membrane feels the presevce oy the outer silvftt. On the ovher hwnd, the conflmed mekbrane vase corresponcs vo tyat of a supported mekbrane close to thg substrata cs considered by Evanw qnd Sdckmdnn [@exqns-88] ans kafer gejerelized by ua [@SRK11]. Here tye corresponding hycrjeynamic screehing lqndth is set by the geometric mean of the Sarfman-Delbrück length $\eta/\wta_{\rm s}$ and the distajce $h$ betreen the membrane and the wall, i.e., $\sqrt{\eta h/\eta_{\rm v}}$ [@SA98]. Nkgict bmat gye presence of the second wall only doubles the actevning effect. In tme following, we shslp kwinly considet the confjned membrane case which wlloww us to tweat most of the calculations abalytically. Nhis is mainly because $\kappa[\omega]$ doex not depend on $k$. However, it shohld be notef that ths limiting expresriok ox eq. (\[conmto\]) gives a reasonafle approeimatnon to tfe foll expwession of eq. (\[gekmseen\]) even for $h \slm \etc/\eta_{\rk s}$ at leadt for a large enough moving oboxct [@SA98; @RKSI11].

Convesnitg the vnscoelssticity of tre surrounding solvenc, we arsume that its cokplex modults obeys the [lwer-law behatior such thar $G_{\rn s}[\omegx]=E_0(i \omega)^{\alpha}$ eith $\alphc < 1$, aw generally argued by Franek [@granek-11]. Thnr behavior is cokmovly ohsxrved xor various [olyoerkv soljtions at hlgh freauencies. Examples ara $\allha=1/2
beta/k^2} {\eta( k^2 + \kappa^2[\omega])}, \label{conmem}$$ where introduced whose square defined as $$\kappa^2[\omega] \frac{i \rho}{\eta}. \label{sqscreen}$$ In limit of $\omega 0$, eq. (\[genoseen\]) reduces to the mobility tensor obtained in ref. [@sanoop-poly-11]. The free membrane case was originally considered Saffman and Delbrück [@saffman-75; @saffman-76], and the relevant length scale is the Saffman-Delbrück $\eta/\eta_{\rm beyond the feels the presence of the outer solvent. On the other hand, the confined membrane case corresponds that of a supported membrane close to the as considered by Evans Sackmann [@evans-88] and later generalized us Here the hydrodynamic length set by the mean of the Saffman-Delbrück length $\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ and the distance $h$ between the membrane and the wall, $\sqrt{\eta h/\eta_{\rm Notice that presence the wall only doubles effect. In the following, we shall confined membrane case which allows us to treat of the analytically. This is mainly because $\kappa[\omega]$ not depend on $k$. However, it should be that the limiting expression of eq. (\[conmem\]) gives a reasonable approximation to the full expression (\[genoseen\]) even for $h \eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ at for large moving [@SA98; @RKSI11]. the viscoelasticity of the surrounding solvent, we assume that its complex obeys the power-law behavior such that $G_{\rm s}[\omega]=G_0(i \omega)^{\alpha}$ with 1$, generally argued by [@granek-11]. This behavior is observed various polymeric solutions at Examples $\alpha=1/2
beta/k^2}
{\eta( k^2 + \kappa^2[\omega])},
\label{cOnmem}$$ where We havE inTroDuCed $\kAppa[\Omega]$ whose squaRE is dEfined as $$\kappa^2[\omega] = \frac{2\Eta_{\rm S}[\oMEga]}{\eTA h} 
+ \Frac{i \Omega \rhO}{\EtA}.
\LAbeL{sQsCreEn}$$

iN tHe limIt oF $\omega \rIghtarrow 0$, eQ. (\[geNoSeen\]) reduces tO ThE static mobIliTy tensor obtaIneD in ref. [@SaNooP-Poly-11]. THe fRee meMbrane CAse was OriginallY cONsiderED by SaffMAN aNd DeLbrück [@saffman-75; @saffMAn-76], ANd the relevant lEngth sCaLE iS THe SAffMan-DelbrücK lEngth $\ETa/\eta_{\rm S}$ BeYOND whICh the membrane Feels the preSEncE of the OuTer SOlvent. on the OtHEr hAnd, the confiNed mEmbrane caSe corrESponds tO That of a SupporTed MemBranE ClOsE to ThE SubSTrAte AS coNsidered By evAns anD SacKMANN [@evaNs-88] aNd laTer geNeralized by us [@sRK11]. here THe cOrresPondiNg hyDrOdynaMic scrEeninG lEngth is set by the GeomEtric mean Of tHe safFmAn-DelBRück leNgtH $\etA/\eta_{\rm s}$ And the dIStaNcE $H$ BEtWeen the membrane and ThE WAlL, i.e., $\sqrt{\eTa h/\eta_{\RM s}}$ [@sA98]. nOtice thaT tHe pReseNCE of thE secONd Wall only DoubleS ThE sCreeninG eFfect. IN tHe fOllOwing, WE shaLl mainLy considEr the COnfined membranE Case which alloWS uS TO tREat mOst Of the calculAtioNS anaLytiCAlLy. THIs is mAinly BeCAuSE $\kappa[\omega]$ does not dEpEnd on $k$. howevEr, it should be nOted that thE LIMiting exPresSIoN Of eq. (\[conmem\]) giveS a reaSonable appROximatioN to thE full expRession of EQ. (\[Genoseen\]) EveN foR $h \sIm \eTA/\EtA_{\rm s}$ at least foR A LargE eNough moVinG object [@sA98; @RkSI11].

conCerNiNg the viscOelasticItY oF tHe SurRoundINg solvenT, wE asSuMe tHat itS CompleX moduLus oBeYs THe pOwer-law BEhAVIor sUcH tHat $G_{\Rm s}[\OmEga]=G_0(i \OmegA)^{\AlpHa}$ with $\aLpha < 1$, as genEraLLy arGuEd By GraneK [@granek-11]. This beHaVior is commOnLy oBserveD FOr variouS polymeric solutions at hiGH frequeNciEs. ExaMpleS are $\alpha=1/2
beta/k^2}
{\eta( k^2 + \ka ppa^2[\ome ga])} ,
\ lab el {con mem} $$ where we ha v e in troduced $\kappa[\omeg a]$ w ho s e sq u ar e isdefined as $ $\k ap pa ^2[ \o m eg a] =\fr ac{2\et a_{\rm s}[ \om eg a]}{\eta h}+\frac{i \o meg a \rho}{\eta }.\label {s qsc r een}$ $
In th e limi t  of $\ omega \ri gh t arrow0 $, eq.( \ [g enos een\]) reduces to th e  static mobili ty ten so r  o b t ain edin ref. [@ sa noop- p oly-11] .  T h e fre e  membrane cas e was origi n all y cons id ere d  by Sa ffman  a n d D elbrück [@s affm an-75; @s affman - 76], an d  the re levant  le ngt h sc a le  i s t he Saf f ma n-D e lbr ück leng th  $ \eta/ \eta _ { \ r m s} $ b eyon d whi ch the membra nefeel s  th e pre sence  ofth e out er sol vent.  O n the other han d, t he confin edme mbr an e cas e  corre spo nds  to tha t of as upp or t e d  m embrane close to t he s ub strate a s cons i de re d  by Evan sand  Sac k m ann [ @eva n s- 88] andlaterg en er alizedby  us [@ SR K11 ].Heret he c orresp onding h ydrod y namic screenin g  length is se t  b y th e  geo met ric mean of  the Saff man- D el brü c k len gth $ \e t a/ \ eta_{\rm s}$ and th edistan ce $h $ between the  membranea n d  the wal l, i . e. ,  $\sqrt{\eta h /\eta _{\rm s}}$ [@SA98].  Noti ce thatthe prese n c e of the  se con d w all o nl y doubles the s cree ni ng effe ct.  In the  fo llo win g,we  shall ma inly con si de rth e c onfin e d membra ne  ca se  wh ich a l lows u s totrea tmo s t o f the c a lc u l atio ns  a naly tic al ly. T hisi s m ainly b ecause $\ kap p a[\o me ga ]$ does  not depend o n$k$. Howev er , i t shou l d  be note d that the limiting exp r essionofeq. ( \[co nmem\]) g ive s a re aso n able a pproxi matio ntot h e ful l ex pre ss ion of eq. ( \[g enose en \])even fo r $h \sim \eta/\et a _{\ rm s}$ at lea stfora la rge en o ugh  m o vin g object [@SA98;@RKSI11].
C o nc erning the vis co elastic ity ofthe s u rroundi ng solven t, we ass um e th a t  it s complexmodulusobeys the power - la w beh avi or suc htha t $G_ {\rm s } [\o mega] =G_0(i  \ omega) ^{\al ph a}$ with  $\alpha < 1$, as gener ally a rgued  by  Granek [ @gr a nek -11]. Thi s be havior iscom mon ly ob ser v ed fo r va r io usp olyme rics olutionsa thig h fr equencies.E x a mpl es ar e $ \ alpha= 1/2
beta/k^2}
{\eta( k^2_+ \kappa^2[\omega])},
\label{conmem}$$_where we have introduced_$\kappa[\omega]$ whose_square_is defined_as_$$\kappa^2[\omega] = \frac{2\eta_{\rm_s}[\omega]}{\eta h} 
+_\frac{i \omega \rho}{\eta}.
\label{sqscreen}$$

In the_limit of $\omega_\rightarrow_0$, eq. (\[genoseen\]) reduces to the static mobility tensor obtained in ref. [@sanoop-poly-11]. The free membrane_case_was originally_considered_by_Saffman and Delbrück [@saffman-75; @saffman-76], and_the relevant length scale is_the Saffman-Delbrück_length $\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$ beyond which the membrane feels_the_presence of the_outer solvent. On the other hand, the confined membrane_case corresponds to that of a_supported membrane close_to_the_substrate as considered by_Evans and Sackmann [@evans-88] and later generalized_by us [@SRK11]. Here the corresponding hydrodynamic_screening length is set by the geometric_mean of the Saffman-Delbrück length $\eta/\eta_{\rm_s}$ and the distance $h$_between the_membrane and the wall, i.e.,_$\sqrt{\eta h/\eta_{\rm s}}$ [@SA98]._Notice that_the presence of_the second wall only doubles the_screening effect. In_the following, we shall mainly consider_the_confined membrane case_which_allows_us to_treat most of_the_calculations analytically._This_is mainly because $\kappa[\omega]$ does not_depend_on $k$. However, it should be noted_that the limiting expression_of_eq. (\[conmem\]) gives a reasonable_approximation to the full expression_of eq. (\[genoseen\]) even for $h \sim_\eta/\eta_{\rm s}$_at least_for a large enough moving object [@SA98; @RKSI11].

Concerning the viscoelasticity of the_surrounding solvent, we assume that its_complex modulus obeys the_power-law behavior_such_that $G_{\rm s}[\omega]=G_0(i_\omega)^{\alpha}$_with $\alpha_< 1$, as generally argued by Granek [@granek-11]._This behavior_is commonly observed for various polymeric_solutions at high frequencies._Examples_are $\alpha=1/2