body curve to the Herschel-PACS data points, and the significant flux at shorter wavelengths predicted by the CE01 and DH02 models (Figure \[seds\]). Any derivation of $L_{IR}$ is model dependent, with the largest differences arising from the presence of a warm dust component in the SED libraries. In Table \[tab:cont\] we list the $L_{IR}$ values derived from the SED template fitting method, as they represent a more accurate description of the total infrared energy output than the modified blackbody. On average, our $L_{IR}$ values are about 25% lower than those found by @Negrello10, but these differences are difficult to judge without data shortward of 100 $\mu$m. Note that these values are rather smaller than typical IR luminosities of classical SMGs and unbiased sources detected by Herschel surveys.

Except for SDP.17, we attribute all the submm flux density to the high redshift galaxy. The foreground lenses for the other galaxies in our sample have optical properties consistent with being quiescent elliptical galaxies, and are therefore unlikely to have a significant submm emission. We have attempted a decomposition of the SDP.17 SED, using the two measured redshifts and a wavelength-independent scaling factor for each of the two components. The $\chi^{2}$ value for the SED template fits is minimized when the observed flux density is split in half between the two components. This factor has been taken into account in Figure \[seds\] and in deriving the $L_{IR}$ for SDP.17a and SDP.17b, as listed in Table \[tab:cont\]. However, the large dust mass inferred for SDP.17a could be an indication that the SED decomposition between SDP.17a and SDP.17b overestimates the contribution of SDP.17a.

We estimate the star formation rates for our galaxy sample using the conversion factor $SFR $($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\times$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$L_{\odot}$) [@Solomon1997]. Since the selected galaxies are lensed by foreground objects with magnification factors $\sim$10 [@Negrello10], the intrinsic IR and CO line luminosities will be $\sim$10 times lower than the direct conversion from the measured fluxes. SDP.81 and SDP.130 have magnification factors of 25 and 6, respectively, as derived from the best-
body curve to the Herschel - PACS data points, and the meaning magnetic field at shorter wavelengths predict by the CE01 and DH02 model (Figure   \[seds\ ]). Any derivation of $ L_{IR}$ is mannequin subject, with the largest difference arising from the presence of a ardent dust component in the SED library. In Table   \[tab: cont\ ] we list the $ L_{IR}$ values derived from the SED template fitting method, as they represent a more accurate description of the entire infrared energy output than the modified black body. On average, our $ L_{IR}$ values are approximately 25% lower than those rule by @Negrello10, but these differences are unmanageable to judge without data shortward of 100   $ \mu$m. Note that these values are quite smaller than typical IR luminosities of classical SMGs and unbiased source detected by Herschel surveys. 

 Except for SDP.17, we attribute all the submm flux density to the high redshift galaxy. The foreground lenses for the other galaxies in our sample distribution suffer optical place coherent with being quiescent elliptical galaxies, and are consequently unlikely to accept a significant submm emission. We have try a decomposition of the SDP.17 SED, using the two measured redshifts and a wavelength - independent scaling factor for each of the two part. The $ \chi^{2}$ value for the SED template fits is minimized when the observed flux concentration is split in one-half between the two components. This factor has been taken into account in Figure   \[seds\ ] and in deriving the $ L_{IR}$ for SDP.17a and SDP.17b, as listed in Table   \[tab: cont\ ]. However, the big dust mass inferred for SDP.17a could be an reading that the SED decomposition between SDP.17a and SDP.17b overvalue the contribution of SDP.17a. 

 We estimate the star geological formation rates for our galax sample using the conversion factor $ SFR $ ($ M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\times$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$L_{\odot}$) [ @Solomon1997 ]. Since the selected galaxies are lensed by foreground object with magnification factor $ \sim$10 [ @Negrello10 ], the intrinsic IR and CO line luminosity will be $ \sim$10 times lower than the direct conversion from the careful flux. SDP.81 and SDP.130 have magnification factors of 25 and 6, respectively, as derived from the best-
bodj curve to the Herschel-PXCS data points, and thx signiricant fuux at shorter wavelengths pcedixted vy the CE01 and DH02 modelr (Figure \[svds\]). Any dwrivetion of $L_{IR}$ is model deizndenf, witk vhe largest difnerences arhsing from the pfedence of a warm dust component in tre SED kihraries. In Tabje \[tan:sont\] we list the $L_{IR}$ values derived frkm the VED template gitting method, as they repgesejt a more accurate descriptiob of rhe total inwrared enegyy output tgan the modified blackbody. On axeragz, our $L_{IR}$ vqlyes dre about 25% oower than those npund bf @Negreklo10, but these cifherebces are difficult to judge without datw shortwasd of 100 $\mu$m. Note that tyese ealuas afw rxthtr xmzller hhai typical ID luminositues of classical SMBs qnd unbiased aourcef qetected by Herschel surveys.

Except for VDP.17, we attribute all the sybmm flux density to jhe high rqdshift galaxy. The foreground lenses for the othes galexkes ik ouf swmple have optical properties consistent with geonn quiescent elliitical galaxies, anc wrr therefore unuikely to have a significanh submm emiswion. We hwve sttempted a decomposition od the SDP.17 SEB, uwing the two measuxed redshiftr anc a wsvelength-independent sccling ractor for fach of tgd two components. Thv $\chh^{2}$ value for the SED templaee fits iw miuimized dhen the ofserved flkx dekvity is split in hwlf bgtween the two clmponents. This factor has been veken into accputt pn Figure \[feds\] snd in derivigg the $L_{IR}$ for SDP.17a aud SDP.17c, as listes in Taule \[tab:cont\]. Hjwever, the lashe dust mass inferreq foe SDP.17a coula be an indicatoon that nht SED deconposition between XDP.17x and SDP.17b overewtinates the controbugiog lf SQ[.17a.

We estimata thd sgsr fofmation ratcs wor pur galaxy sample ushng fhe conversion facyov $SFR $($M_{\odit}$ yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\timqs$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$L_{\odot}$) [@Sokomon1997]. Since the sepectev galaeies ate jensed by foreground objects wjth magnivicwtion factorf $\sin$10 [@Negrello10], tke intrinsic IR and CO line luminosities will be $\sim$10 times lower than the dirgct conversion from the measgred fluxes. SDP.81 and WDP.130 have magnificstion factors of 25 and 6, respactivfly, as derived from the best-
body curve to the Herschel-PACS data points, significant at shorter predicted by the \[seds\]). derivation of $L_{IR}$ model dependent, with largest differences arising from the presence a warm dust component in the SED libraries. In Table \[tab:cont\] we list $L_{IR}$ values derived from the SED template fitting method, as they represent a accurate of total energy output than the modified blackbody. On average, our $L_{IR}$ values are about 25% lower than found by @Negrello10, but these differences are difficult judge without data shortward 100 $\mu$m. Note that these are smaller than IR of SMGs and unbiased detected by Herschel surveys. Except for SDP.17, we attribute all the submm flux density to the high galaxy. The for the galaxies our have optical properties being quiescent elliptical galaxies, and are have a significant submm emission. We have attempted decomposition of SDP.17 SED, using the two measured and a wavelength-independent scaling factor for each of two components. The $\chi^{2}$ value for the SED template fits is minimized when the observed is split in half the two components. factor been into in Figure and in deriving the $L_{IR}$ for SDP.17a and SDP.17b, as listed Table \[tab:cont\]. However, the large dust mass inferred for SDP.17a an that the SED between SDP.17a and SDP.17b the of SDP.17a. We estimate formation for using conversion $SFR $($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\times$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$L_{\odot}$) [@Solomon1997]. the selected galaxies are lensed foreground objects with magnification IR and CO line luminosities will be $\sim$10 lower than the direct conversion from the fluxes. SDP.81 and SDP.130 have magnification factors of 25 and 6, respectively, derived from
body curve to the Herschel-PACs data pointS, and tHe sIgnIfIcanT fluX at shorter waveLEngtHs predicted by the CE01 and Dh02 modeLs (fIgurE \[SeDs\]). Any DerivatIOn OF $l_{IR}$ Is MoDel DePEnDent, wIth The largEst differeNceS aRising from thE PrEsence of a wArm Dust componenT in The SED LiBraRIes. In tabLe \[tab:Cont\] we LIst the $l_{IR}$ values DeRIved frOM the SED TEMpLate Fitting method, as thEY rEPresent a more acCurate DeSCrIPTioN of The total inFrAred eNErgy outPUt THAN thE Modified blackBody. On averaGE, ouR $L_{IR}$ vaLuEs aRE about 25% Lower ThAN thOse found by @NEgreLlo10, but theSe diffERences aRE difficUlt to jUdgE wiThouT DaTa ShoRtWArd OF 100 $\mU$m. NOTe tHat these VaLuEs are RathER SMAlleR thAn tyPical iR luminositieS of ClasSIcaL SMGs And unBiasEd SourcEs deteCted bY HErschel surveys.

EXcepT for SDP.17, we AttRiButE aLl the SUbmm flUx dEnsIty to thE high reDShiFt GALAxY. The foreground lensEs FOR tHe other gAlaxieS In OuR Sample haVe OptIcal PROpertIes cONsIstent wiTh beinG QuIeScent elLiPtical GaLaxIes, And arE TherEfore uNlikely tO have A Significant subMM emission. We haVE aTTEmPTed a DecOmposition oF the sdP.17 SEd, usiNG tHe tWO measUred rEdSHiFTs and a wavelength-indEpEndent ScaliNg factor for eaCh of the two COMPonents. THe $\chI^{2}$ VaLUe for the SED temPlate Fits is miniMIzed when The obServed flUx density IS Split in hAlf BetWeeN thE TWo Components. ThiS FActoR hAs been tAkeN into acCouNt iN FiGurE \[sEds\] and in dEriving tHe $l_{Ir}$ fOr sDP.17A and Sdp.17b, as listEd In TAbLe \[tAb:conT\]. howeveR, the lArge DuSt MAss InferreD FoR sdP.17a cOuLd Be an IndIcAtion That THe SeD decomPosition bEtwEEn SDp.17a AnD SDP.17b ovErestimates thE cOntributioN oF SDp.17a.

We esTIMate the sTar formation rates for our GAlaxy saMplE usinG the ConversioN faCtor $SFr $($M_{\oDOt}$ yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\tiMes$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$l_{\odot}$) [@soLomON1997]. since THE sEleCtEd galaxies ARE leNsed bY fOregRound obJects with magnificaTIon Factors $\sim$10 [@NegRelLo10], thE INtRinSIc ir anD Co LinE LUminosities will Be $\sim$10 times LoWEr Than the dirECt cOnVersion From the MeasuREd fluxeS. SDP.81 and SDp.130 have magnIfIcatION faCtors of 25 and 6, RespectiVely, as derIVed frOM tHe besT-
body curve to the Herschel -PACS data  poin ts,  an dthesign ificant flux a t  sho rter wavelengths predi ctedby theC E0 1 and  DH02 m o de l s  (F ig ur e \ [s e ds \]).Any  deriva tion of $L _{I R} $ is model d e pe ndent, wit h t he largest d iff erence sari s ing f rom  thepresen c e of a  warm dus tc ompone n t in th e SE D li braries. In Table \[ t ab:cont\] we l ist th e$ L_ { I R}$  va lues deriv ed  from the SED te m p l ate fitting metho d, as theyr epr esentamor e  accur ate d es c rip tion of the  tot al infrar ed ene r gy outp u t thanthe mo dif ied  bla c kb od y.On ave r ag e,o ur$L_{IR}$  v al ues a re a b o u t  25%  lo werthanthose found b y @ Negr e llo 10, b ut th esedi ffere nces a re di ff icult to judgewith out datasho rt war dof 10 0  $\mu$ m.Not e thatthese v a lue sa r e  r ather smaller than  t y p ic al IR lu minosi t ie so f classi ca l S MGsa n d unb iase d  s ources d etecte d  b yHersche lsurvey s. 

E xce pt fo r  SDP .17, w e attrib ute a l l the submm fl u x density tot he h ig h  red shi ft galaxy.Thef oreg roun d  l ens e s for  theot h er galaxies in our sam pl e have  opti cal propertie s consiste n t with bei ng q u ie s cent elliptica l gal axies, and are ther efore  unlikel y to have a  signifi can t s ubm m e m i ss ion. We havea t temp te d a dec omp osition  of  th e S DP. 17  SED, usi ng the t wo  m ea su red  reds h ifts and  a  wa ve len gth-i n depend ent s cali ng  f a cto r for e a ch o f th etw o co mpo ne nts.The$ \ch i^{2}$value for  th e  SED  t em plate f its is minimi ze d when the  o bse rved f l u x densit y is split in half betw e en thetwo  comp onen ts. Thisfac tor ha s b e en tak en int o acc ou nti n  Figu r e  \ [se ds \] and ind e riv ing t he  $L_ {IR}$ f or SDP.17a and SDP . 17b , as listed i n T able \ [t ab: c on t \].  H o wev e r , the large dus t mass inf er r ed  for SDP.1 7 a c ou ld be a n indic ation that th e SED dec ompositio nbetw e e n S DP.17a and  SDP.17b  overesti m atest he  cont rib utionof  SD P.17a .

Wee sti matethe st ar  forma tionra tes forour galaxy sample using  the c onver sio n factor$SF R  $( $M_{\odot }$ y r$^{-1}$)= 1.5 $\t imes$ 10$ ^ {-10} $($L _ {I R}$ / $L_{\ odot } $) [@Solo m on 199 7 ] .Since the s e l e cte d gal axi e s arelens ed by foregroundo bjects with ma gnif i c ati onf acto rs  $\sim$10 [@Ne gre ll o 1 0], thein trinsic IRand CO l in e  lumi nositi es wil l be $\ s i m$ 1 0 time s lo wer  than the  di re c t conve rs io n  fromtheme asured  fluxe s . SD P . 81 and SDP.130 h ave m a g nific a tio n fac to rs of 2 5  and  6, respec tively, asderive d fr om th e best- 
body curve_to the_Herschel-PACS data points, and_the significant_flux_at shorter_wavelengths_predicted by the_CE01 and DH02_models (Figure \[seds\]). Any derivation_of $L_{IR}$ is_model_dependent, with the largest differences arising from the presence of a warm dust component_in_the SED_libraries._In_Table \[tab:cont\] we list the $L_{IR}$_values derived from the SED_template fitting_method, as they represent a more accurate description_of_the total infrared_energy output than the modified blackbody. On average, our_$L_{IR}$ values are about 25% lower_than those found_by_@Negrello10,_but these differences are_difficult to judge without data shortward_of 100 $\mu$m. Note that these values_are rather smaller than typical IR luminosities_of classical SMGs and unbiased sources_detected by Herschel surveys.

Except for_SDP.17, we_attribute all the submm flux_density to the_high redshift_galaxy. The foreground_lenses for the other galaxies in_our sample have_optical properties consistent with being quiescent_elliptical_galaxies, and are_therefore_unlikely_to have_a significant submm_emission._We have_attempted_a decomposition of the SDP.17 SED,_using_the two measured redshifts and a wavelength-independent_scaling factor for each_of_the two components. The_$\chi^{2}$ value for the SED_template fits is minimized when the_observed flux_density is_split in half between the two components. This factor has been_taken into account in Figure \[seds\] and_in deriving the $L_{IR}$_for SDP.17a_and_SDP.17b, as listed_in_Table \[tab:cont\]. However,_the large dust mass inferred for SDP.17a_could be_an indication that the SED decomposition_between SDP.17a and SDP.17b_overestimates_the contribution of SDP.17a.

We estimate the_star formation rates for our galaxy_sample using the conversion factor_$SFR_$($M_{\odot}$_yr$^{-1}$)=1.5$\times$10$^{-10}$($L_{IR}$/$L_{\odot}$) [@Solomon1997]. Since the selected_galaxies are lensed by foreground objects_with magnification factors_$\sim$10 [@Negrello10], the intrinsic IR and CO_line_luminosities will be $\sim$10 times lower_than_the direct conversion from the measured_fluxes._SDP.81_and SDP.130 have magnification factors_of 25 and 6, respectively, as_derived from the best-