rangle \equiv
|n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$ for the basis states of the first Landau level (see Eq. (\[2.1\])) and we take $${ \label{5.3} } \langle k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle = \sqrt{{2l\pi^{1 \over2}}
\over L_y} e^{-{x_0^2 \over 2l^2} - {k_y^2l^2\over 2} +
k_y(x_0+iy_0)}.$$ It is then straightforward to show that $${ \label{5.4} } \langle {{\bf r}}| x_0, y_0\rangle = { 1\over \sqrt{2\pi}l}
e^{- {(x-x_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } - {(y-y_0)^2 \over 4l^2 }}e^{-{i \over
2l^2}(x+x_0)(y-y_0)}.$$ In other words, $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ is an eigenstate of the first Landau level strongly peaked at ${{\bf r}}= {{\bf r}}_0$. (The phase factor is due to the proper magnetic translation). We then define the projected density of states \[compare with Eq. (\[5.1\])\]: $${ \label{5.5} } \rho_P (x_0,y_0; E) = { 1 \over \pi} \mbox{Im} \langle
x_0,y_0|\hat{G}^{A}(E)|x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ and use it to study the spatial distribution of the electron wave-functions at different energies. Strictly speaking, the local density of states defined in Eq. (\[5.1\]) cannot be projected exactly on the lowest Landau level, because the lowest Landau level does not support a $\delta$-function ($\langle {{\bf r}}| n,k_y,\sigma\rangle \ne
0$, $\forall n$). However, the coherent states $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ we select are the maximally spatially-localized wave functions in the lowest Landau level, and have the added advantage that they can be easily stored as sparse vectors, because of their Gaussian profiles \[see Eq
rangle \equiv 
 |n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$ for the basis states of the first Landau level (visualize Eq.   (\[2.1\ ]) ) and we consume $ $ { \label{5.3 } } \langle k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle = \sqrt{{2l\pi^{1 \over2 } } 
 \over L_y } e^{-{x_0 ^ 2 \over 2l^2 } - { k_y^2l^2\over 2 } + 
 k_y(x_0+iy_0)}.$$ It is then straightforward to show that $ $ { \label{5.4 } } \langle { { \bf r}}| x_0, y_0\rangle = { 1\over \sqrt{2\pi}l } 
 e^{- { (x - x_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } - { (y - y_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } } e^{-{i \over 
 2l^2}(x+x_0)(y - y_0)}.$$ In other quarrel, $ |x_0,y_0\rangle$ is an eigenstate of the first Landau level powerfully peaked at $ { { \bf r}}= { { \bf r}}_0$. (The phase factor is due to the proper charismatic transformation). We then define the projected concentration of states \[compare with Eq.   (\[5.1\])\ ]: $ $ { \label{5.5 } } \rho_P (x_0,y_0; E) = { 1 \over \pi } \mbox{Im } \langle 
 x_0,y_0|\hat{G}^{A}(E)|x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ and use it to learn the spatial distribution of the electron wave - routine at different energies. Strictly speaking, the local density of state defined in Eq.   (\[5.1\ ]) cannot be projected exactly on the low Landau level, because the lowest Landau level does not support a $ \delta$-function ($ \langle { { \bf r}}| n, k_y,\sigma\rangle \ne 
 0 $, $ \forall n$). However, the coherent state $ |x_0,y_0\rangle$ we select are the maximally spatially - localized wave functions in the lowest Landau level, and own the added advantage that they can be easily stored as sparse vectors, because of their Gaussian profiles \[see Eq
ranhle \equiv
|n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$ nor the basis stcres of the fjrst Lanaau level (see Eq. (\[2.1\])) and we take $${ \oabel{5.3} } \langle k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle = \rqrt{{2l\pi^{1 \oner2}}
\over L_t} e^{-{x_0^2 \iver 2l^2} - {k_y^2l^2\over 2} +
k_n(r_0+iy_0)}.$$ If is chxn straightforwsrd to shof that $${ \label{5.4} } \lxnyle {{\bf r}}| x_0, y_0\rangle = { 1\over \sqrt{2\pi}l}
e^{- {(x-v_0)^2 \over 4k^2 } - {(y-y_0)^2 \over 4l^2 }}e^{-{i \oveg
2l^2}(v+x_0)(y-y_0)}.$$ Pn other words, $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ is an ejgenstaue of the first Lamdau level strongly peaked at ${{\hf r}}= {{\bf r}}_0$. (The phasf factor is due ro the propef magnetic translation). We then define the projected ddnsitv of states \[cimpwte with Eq. (\[5.1\])\]: $${ \oabel{5.5} } \rho_P (x_0,y_0; E) = { 1 \over \[i} \mbox{Om} \langle
x_0,y_0|\hat{N}^{A}(E)|x_0,y_0\cangoe,$$ and use it to studb the spatial distrifution of tke electron wave-functuobs at difxerevr everfixs. Atrictpy apeaking, tge local debsity of states defonqe in Eq. (\[5.1\]) cannof be pwotected exactly on the lowest Landau levtl, bedause the lowest Landau level does not suppott a $\delta$-sunction ($\langle {{\bf r}}| n,k_y,\sigma\rangle \ne
0$, $\forall n$). Hmwevec, ghe cjfwrfnt states $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ we select are the maximaljg xpstially-localizcd wave functions on tng lowest Landao level, ans have the added afvantagg that they can be rasily stored as sparse vecrors, because if their Gaussian 'rofiles \[see Eq
rangle \equiv |n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$ for the basis states first level (see (\[2.1\])) and we k_y| = \sqrt{{2l\pi^{1 \over2}} L_y} e^{-{x_0^2 \over - {k_y^2l^2\over 2} + k_y(x_0+iy_0)}.$$ It then straightforward to show that $${ \label{5.4} } \langle {{\bf r}}| x_0, y_0\rangle { 1\over \sqrt{2\pi}l} e^{- {(x-x_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } - {(y-y_0)^2 \over 4l^2 }}e^{-{i 2l^2}(x+x_0)(y-y_0)}.$$ other $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ an eigenstate of the first Landau level strongly peaked at ${{\bf r}}= {{\bf r}}_0$. (The phase is due to the proper magnetic translation). We define the projected density states \[compare with Eq. (\[5.1\])\]: \label{5.5} \rho_P (x_0,y_0; = 1 \pi} \mbox{Im} \langle and use it to study the spatial distribution of the electron wave-functions at different energies. Strictly speaking, local density defined in (\[5.1\]) be exactly on the level, because the lowest Landau level a $\delta$-function ($\langle {{\bf r}}| n,k_y,\sigma\rangle \ne 0$, n$). However, coherent states $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ we select are maximally spatially-localized wave functions in the lowest Landau and have the added advantage that they can be easily stored as sparse vectors, because Gaussian profiles \[see Eq
rangle \equiv
|n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$ For the basiS statEs oF thE fIrst landAu level (see Eq. (\[2.1\])) anD We taKe $${ \label{5.3} } \langle k_y| x_0,y_0\ranglE = \sqrt{{2L\pI^{1 \Over2}}
\OVeR L_y} e^{-{x_0^2 \Over 2l^2} - {k_y^2L^2\OvER 2} +
K_y(x_0+Iy_0)}.$$ it Is tHeN StRaighTfoRward to Show that $${ \laBel{5.4} } \LaNgle {{\bf r}}| x_0, y_0\ranGLe = { 1\Over \sqrt{2\pi}L}
e^{- {(x-X_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } - {(y-y_0)^2 \over 4L^2 }}e^{-{i \Over
2l^2}(x+X_0)(y-Y_0)}.$$ In OTher wOrdS, $|x_0,y_0\raNgle$ is AN eigenState of thE fIRst LanDAu level STRoNgly Peaked at ${{\bf r}}= {{\bf r}}_0$. (The PHaSE factor is due to The proPeR MaGNEtiC trAnslation). WE tHen deFIne the pROjECTEd dENsity of states \[Compare with eQ. (\[5.1\])\]: $${ \laBel{5.5} } \rho_p (x_0,Y_0; E) = { 1 \oVEr \pi} \mbOx{Im} \lAnGLe
x_0,Y_0|\hat{G}^{A}(E)|x_0,y_0\raNgle,$$ And use it tO study THe spatiAL distriBution Of tHe eLectROn WaVe-fUnCTioNS aT diFFerEnt energIeS. STrictLy spEAKINg, thE loCal dEnsitY of states defiNed In Eq. (\[5.1\]) CAnnOt be pRojecTed eXaCtly oN the loWest LAnDau level, because The lOwest LandAu lEvEl dOeS not sUPport a $\DelTa$-fUnction ($\Langle {{\bF R}}| n,k_Y,\sIGMA\rAngle \ne
0$, $\forall n$). HoweVeR, THe Coherent States $|X_0,Y_0\rAnGLe$ we seleCt Are The mAXImallY spaTIaLly-localIzed waVE fUnCtions iN tHe loweSt lanDau Level, ANd haVe the aDded advaNtage THat they can be eaSIly stored as spARsE VEcTOrs, bEcaUse of their GAussIAn prOfilES \[sEe EQ
rangle \equiv
|n=0,k_y,\si gma\rangle $ for  th e b as is s tate s of the first Land au level (see Eq. (\[2 .1\]) )a nd w e  t ake $ ${ \lab e l{ 5 . 3}}\l ang le k_ y| x_ 0,y _0\rang le = \sqrt {{2 l\ pi^{1 \over2 } }\over L_y}  e^ {-{x_0^2 \ov er2l^2}-{k_ y ^2l^2 \ov er 2}  +
k_y ( x_0+iy _0)}.$$ I ti s then straigh t f or ward  to show that $${ \l a bel{5.4} } \la ngle { {\ b fr } }|x_0 , y_0\rang le  = {1 \over \ s qr t { 2 \pi } l}
e^{- {(x-x _0)^2 \over 4l^ 2 } -{( y-y _ 0)^2 \ over4l ^ 2 } }e^{-{i \ov er
2 l^2}(x+x_ 0)(y-y _ 0)}.$$I n other  words , $ |x_ 0,y_ 0 \r an gle $i s a n  e ige n sta te of th efi rst L anda u l e velstr ongl y pea ked at ${{\bf  r} }= { { \bf  r}}_ 0$. ( Theph ase f actoris du eto the proper m agne tic trans lat io n).  W e the n  defin e t heproject ed dens i tyof s t at es \[compare withEq . (\ [5.1\])\ ]: $${ \l ab e l{5.5} }  \ rho _P ( x _ 0,y_0 ; E) ={ 1 \ove r \pi} \m bo x{Im} \ la ngle
x _0 ,y_ 0|\ hat{G } ^{A} (E)|x_ 0,y_0\ra ngle, $ $ and use it t o  study the sp a ti a l  d i stri but ion of theelec t ronwave - fu nct i ons a t dif fe r en t  energies. Strictly  s peakin g, th e local densi ty of stat e s definedin E q .( \[5.1\]) canno t beprojectede xactly o n the  lowestLandau le v e l, becau sethe  lo wes t La ndau level do e s  not  s upporta $ \delta$ -fu nct ion  ($ \l angle {{\ bf r}}|n, k_ y, \s igm a\ran g le \ne
0 $,  $\ fo ral l n$) .  Howev er, t he c oh er e ntstates$ |x _ 0 ,y_0 \r an gle$  we  s elect  are the  maxima lly spati all y -loc al iz ed wave  functions in  t he lowestLa nda u leve l ,  and hav e the added advantage t h at they  ca n beeasi ly stored  as  spars e v e ctors,  becau se of  t hei r Gauss i a npro fi les \[seeE q 
rangle \equiv
|n=0,k_y,\sigma\rangle$_for the_basis states of the_first Landau_level_(see Eq. (\[2.1\]))_and_we take $${_\label{5.3} } \langle_k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle = \sqrt{{2l\pi^{1_\over2}}
\over L_y} e^{-{x_0^2_\over_2l^2} - {k_y^2l^2\over 2} +
k_y(x_0+iy_0)}.$$ It is then straightforward to show that $${ \label{5.4}_}_\langle {{\bf_r}}|_x_0,_y_0\rangle = { 1\over \sqrt{2\pi}l}
e^{-_{(x-x_0)^2 \over 4l^2 } -_{(y-y_0)^2 \over_4l^2 }}e^{-{i \over
2l^2}(x+x_0)(y-y_0)}.$$ In other words, $|x_0,y_0\rangle$ is_an_eigenstate of the_first Landau level strongly peaked at ${{\bf r}}= {{\bf_r}}_0$. (The phase factor is due_to the proper_magnetic_translation)._We then define the_projected density of states \[compare with_Eq. (\[5.1\])\]: $${ \label{5.5} } \rho_P (x_0,y_0;_E) = { 1 \over \pi} \mbox{Im}_\langle
x_0,y_0|\hat{G}^{A}(E)|x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ and use it to study_the spatial distribution of the_electron wave-functions_at different energies. Strictly speaking,_the local density_of states_defined in Eq. (\[5.1\])_cannot be projected exactly on the_lowest Landau level,_because the lowest Landau level does_not_support a $\delta$-function_($\langle_{{\bf_r}}| n,k_y,\sigma\rangle_\ne
0$, $\forall n$)._However,_the coherent_states_$|x_0,y_0\rangle$ we select are the maximally_spatially-localized_wave functions in the lowest Landau level,_and have the added_advantage_that they can be_easily stored as sparse vectors,_because of their Gaussian profiles \[see_Eq