 contribution to the track flux (after oscillations). The resultant peak flux is larger than the measured flux at energies just below the region of interest for IceCube’s cascade analysis. From SU(2) symmetry there will be an $e^+e^-$ channel, leading to $\gamma$-rays from electroweak corrections constrained by [*Fermi*]{}-LAT [@Murase:2015gea]. Finally, this fit requires a short DM lifetime which is strongly constrained by the cosmic microwave background and bounds from the reionization epoch, the best fit values being $\tau_\chi\sim10^{23}$ s, $m_\chi\sim10$ TeV [@Liu:2016cnk; @Slatyer:2016qyl]. All considered, DM decay does not seem to resolve this tension.

Several additional effects could provide an energy and flavor dependent modification of the standard neutrino flux from an astrophysical source. For example, the Glashow resonance occurs when a $\bar\nu_e$ with $E_\nu=6.3$ PeV scatters off an electron in the ice creating an on-shell $W^-$ [@Glashow:1960zz] increasing IceCube’s sensitivity in that energy range considerably. IceCube performs their fits assuming that $\mathcal{I}_\nu=\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu}$. While this is generally the case if neutrinos are mainly produced through $pp$ interactions, it won’t be the case if the main neutrino production channel is $p\gamma$ interactions [@Nunokawa:2016pop]. For the SPL case $\mathcal{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu_e}\simeq3.5$ which would somewhat harden the cascade spectrum, but would not be enough to reduce the tension of the fit.

Another option that could alleviate the track vs. cascade fit tension is neutron decay sources. Neutrons decay to $\bar\nu_e$’s and are produced alongside charged pions in $p\gamma$ interactions (as well as in $pp$ interactions) and are thus expected to provide an additional contribution of $\nu_e$’s to the high energy astrophysical neutrino flux. The energy of neutrinos from neutrons is suppressed by about two orders of magnitude compared with those from pion decay. However, for a spectral index $\gtrsim2$ as in our case, this contribution is subleading. Neutrons also result from photodisintegration of heavy ions
contribution to the track flux (after oscillations). The resultant acme magnetic field is larger than the measured flux at energy just below the region of pastime for IceCube ’s shower analysis. From SU(2) symmetry there will be an $ e^+e^-$ channel, leading to $ \gamma$-rays from electroweak corrections stiffen by [ * Fermi*]{}-LAT [ @Murase:2015gea ]. Finally, this fit ask a light DM lifetime which is strongly constrained by the cosmic microwave background and bounds from the reionization epoch, the good fit values being $ \tau_\chi\sim10^{23}$ s, $ m_\chi\sim10 $ TeV   [ @Liu:2016cnk; @Slatyer:2016qyl ]. All consider, DM decay does not seem to resolve this tension. 

 Several extra effects could put up an energy and flavor dependent change of the standard neutrino flux from an astrophysical source. For example, the Glashow resonance occurs when a $ \bar\nu_e$ with $ E_\nu=6.3 $ PeV scatter off an electron in the ice creating an on - shell $ W^-$ [ @Glashow:1960zz ] increasing IceCube ’s sensitivity in that energy range considerably. IceCube performs their fits assuming that $ \mathcal{I}_\nu=\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu}$. While this is by and large the case if neutrinos are chiefly produce through $ pp$ interaction, it wo n’t be the case if the main neutrino product channel is $ p\gamma$ interactions [ @Nunokawa:2016pop ]. For the SPL case $ \mathcal{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu_e}\simeq3.5 $ which would somewhat inure the cascade spectrum, but would not be enough to reduce the tension of the fit. 

 Another option that could facilitate the track vs.   cascade fit tension is neutron decay sources. neutron decay to $ \bar\nu_e$ ’s and are produce alongside charge pions in $ p\gamma$ interactions (as well as in $ pp$ interaction) and are thus expected to provide an extra contribution of $ \nu_e$ ’s to the high department of energy astrophysical neutrino flux. The energy of neutrinos from neutrons is suppressed by approximately two orders of magnitude compared with those from pion decay. However, for a spectral index $ \gtrsim2 $ as in our event, this contribution is subleading. Neutrons besides result from photodisintegration of heavy ion
 cojtribution to the track nlux (after oscillations). The rssultant peak flux is larger than thx meqsuree flux at energies jusg below tje regiob of unterest for IceCunz’s caagade cnelysis. From SU(2) xymmetry tvere will be at $d^+e^-$ channel, leading to $\gamma$-rays from qlectroeewk corrections conxeraihvd by [*Fermi*]{}-LAT [@Murase:2015gea]. Finallg, this hit requires a xhort DM lifetime which is strlngly constrained hy the cosmuc myxrowave backeround and bounds from the reionization epoch, the besg fit values beunt $\two_\chi\sim10^{23}$ s, $m_\cii\sim10$ NeV [@Liu:2016cnk; @Slabjer:2016qyl]. Dll conxidered, DM decsy voes not seem to resolve vhis tension.

Several wdditionan zffects could provide ab enetgy atd fuqvof dtpeideht modlfiration of tge standard neutrino flux from ag astrophysicam sourse. For example, the Glashow resonance occugs wgen a $\bar\nu_e$ with $E_\nu=6.3$ PwV scatters off an elgctron in ehe ice creating an on-shell $W^-$ [@Glashow:1960zz] increasinc IceRuce’s scnsiguvlty in that energy range considerably. IceCube letfprms their fitf assuming yhwt $\iathcal{I}_\nu=\matfcal{I}_{\bcd\nh}$. While this is gejerally the xase if ntutrimos are mainly produced thriugh $pp$ integactuons, it won’t be thz case if thz main neuttino production channel is $l\gamma$ integactions [@Hjnokawa:2016pop]. For tfe XPN case $\mathcal{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I}_{\far\nu_e}\simxq3.5$ whnch woula sokewhat harden thf casgdde spectrum, but wluld uot ba enough tl reduce the tension of the fit.

Eiother option tvat could ajleviste the track vs. cascade fit tensiou is ndutron deczy sourres. Neutrons decay to $\bar\to_e$’s and are pcoduced ajongwide chargea pions in $p\gamka$ interabtnons (as wwll as in $pp$ interectiuhs) and are thus exkexted to providr av aqdptipnwn contributimn ow $\nj_r$’s to the high ekerey axtrophysical neutrinm flhx. The energy of nrubrinos frim neutrjns is supprexsed by about two lrderv oh magnotuqe compared with those from pikn decay. Jowcver, for a spqctrql index $\gtrxim2$ as in our case, this contribution is subleading. Neutrobs also result from khotodisintegcation of heavy ions
contribution to the track flux (after oscillations). peak is larger the measured flux region interest for IceCube’s analysis. From SU(2) there will be an $e^+e^-$ channel, to $\gamma$-rays from electroweak corrections constrained by [*Fermi*]{}-LAT [@Murase:2015gea]. Finally, this fit requires short DM lifetime which is strongly constrained by the cosmic microwave background and from reionization the fit values being $\tau_\chi\sim10^{23}$ s, $m_\chi\sim10$ TeV [@Liu:2016cnk; @Slatyer:2016qyl]. All considered, DM decay does not seem resolve this tension. Several additional effects could provide energy and flavor dependent of the standard neutrino flux an source. For the resonance when a $\bar\nu_e$ $E_\nu=6.3$ PeV scatters off an electron in the ice creating an on-shell $W^-$ [@Glashow:1960zz] increasing IceCube’s sensitivity that energy IceCube performs fits that While this is case if neutrinos are mainly produced it won’t be the case if the main production channel $p\gamma$ interactions [@Nunokawa:2016pop]. For the SPL $\mathcal{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu_e}\simeq3.5$ which would somewhat harden the cascade spectrum, would not be enough to reduce the tension of the fit. Another option that could track vs. cascade fit is neutron decay Neutrons to and produced alongside pions in $p\gamma$ interactions (as well as in $pp$ interactions) and thus expected to provide an additional contribution of $\nu_e$’s to energy neutrino flux. The of neutrinos from neutrons suppressed about two orders of with from for spectral $\gtrsim2$ as in our this contribution is subleading. Neutrons result from photodisintegration of
 contribution to the track fluX (after osciLlatiOns). the ReSultAnt pEak flux is largeR Than The measured flux at energIes juSt BElow THe RegioN of inteREsT FOr ICecuBe’s CaSCaDe anaLysIs. From Su(2) symmetry tHerE wIll be an $e^+e^-$ chaNNeL, leading to $\GamMa$-rays from elEctRoweak CoRreCTions ConStraiNed by [*FERmi*]{}-LAT [@murase:2015gea]. fiNAlly, thIS fit reqUIReS a shOrt DM lifetime whicH Is STrongly constraIned by ThE CoSMIc mIcrOwave backgRoUnd anD Bounds fROm THE ReiONization epoch, The best fit vALueS being $\TaU_\chI\Sim10^{23}$ s, $m_\cHi\sim10$ tev [@liu:2016Cnk; @Slatyer:2016qYl]. AlL considerEd, DM deCAy does nOT seem to ResolvE thIs tEnsiON.

SEvEraL aDDitIOnAl eFFecTs could pRoViDe an eNergY AND FlavOr dEpenDent mOdification of The StanDArd NeutrIno flUx frOm An astRophysIcal sOuRce. For example, thE GlaShow resonAncE oCcuRs When a $\BAr\nu_e$ wIth $e_\nu=6.3$ peV scatTers off AN elEcTRON iN the ice creating an oN-sHELl $w^-$ [@Glashow:1960Zz] incrEAsInG iceCube’s SeNsiTiviTY In thaT eneRGy Range conSideraBLy. icECube peRfOrms thEiR fiTs aSsumiNG thaT $\mathcAl{I}_\nu=\matHcal{I}_{\BAr\nu}$. While this iS Generally the cASe IF NeUTrinOs aRe mainly proDuceD ThroUgh $pP$ InTerACtionS, it woN’t BE tHE case if the main neutrInO produCtion Channel is $p\gamMa$ interactIONS [@NunokawA:2016pop]. fOr THe SPL case $\mathcAl{I}_{\nu_E}/\mathcal{I}_{\bAR\nu_e}\simeQ3.5$ whicH would soMewhat harDEN the cascAde SpeCtrUm, bUT WoUld not be enougH TO redUcE the tenSioN of the fIt.

ANotHer OptIoN that coulD alleviaTe ThE tRaCk vS. cascADe fit tenSiOn iS nEutRon deCAy sourCes. NeUtroNs DeCAy tO $\bar\nu_e$’S AnD ARe prOdUcEd alOngSiDe chaRged PIonS in $p\gamMa$ interacTioNS (as wElL aS in $pp$ inTeractions) and ArE thus expecTeD to ProvidE AN additioNal contribution of $\nu_e$’s to THe high eNerGy astRophYsical neuTriNo flux. the ENergy oF neutrInos fRoM neUTRons iS SUpPreSsEd by about tWO OrdErs of MaGnitUde compAred with those from pIOn dEcay. However, foR a sPectRAL iNdeX $\GtRSim2$ As IN ouR CAse, this contribuTion is sublEaDInG. Neutrons aLSo rEsUlt from PhotodiSinteGRation oF heavy ionS
 contribution to the track  flux (aft er os cil lat io ns).  The  resultant pea k  flu x is larger than the m easur ed flux at  ener gies ju s tb e low  t he  re gi o nof in ter est for  IceCube’s  ca sc ade analysis .  F rom SU(2)sym metry therewil l be a n$e^ + e^-$cha nnel,  leadi n g to $ \gamma$-r ay s  frome lectrow e a kcorr ections constrain e db y [*Fermi*]{}- LAT [@ Mu r as e : 201 5ge a]. Finall y,  this fit req u ir e s a s h ort DM lifeti me which is str onglyco nst r ainedby th ec osm ic microwav e ba ckgroundand bo u nds fro m  the re ioniza tio n e poch ,  t he  be st fit va lue s  be ing $\ta u_ \c hi\si m10^ { 2 3 } $ s,  $m _\ch i\sim 10$ TeV [@Liu :20 16cn k ; @ Slaty er:20 16qy l] . All  consi dered ,DM decay does n ot s eem to re sol ve  th is  tens i on.

S eve ral  additi onal ef f ect sc o u ld  provide an energy  a n d  f lavor de penden t  m od i fication  o f t he s t a ndard  neu t ri no fluxfrom a n  a st rophysi ca l sour ce . F orexamp l e, t he Gla show res onanc e  occurs when a $\bar\nu_e$ w i th $ E_ \ nu=6 .3$  PeV scatte rs o f f an  ele c tr oni n the  icecr e at i ng an on-shell $W^- $[@Glas how:1 960zz] increa sing IceCu b e ’ s sensit ivit y  i n  that energy r angeconsiderab l y. IceCu be pe rforms t heir fits a ssumingtha t $ \ma thc a l {I }_\nu=\mathca l { I}_{ \b ar\nu}$ . W hile th isisgen era ll y the cas e if neu tr in os  a remainl y  produce dthr ou gh$pp$i nterac tions , it  w on ’ t b e the c a se i f th ema in n eut ri no pr oduc t ion  channe l is $p\g amm a $ in te ra ctions[@Nunokawa:20 16 pop]. Forth e S PL cas e $\mathca l{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I } _{\bar\ nu_ e}\si meq3 .5$ which  wo uld so mew h at har den th e cas ca des p ectru m ,  b utwo uld not be e nou gh to  r educ e the t ension of the fit. 
An other optiontha t co u l dall e vi a teth e  tr a c k vs. cascade f it tension  i s  n eutron dec a y s ou rces. N eutrons  deca y  to $\b ar\nu_e$’ s and are  p rodu c e d a longside c harged p ions in $ p \gamm a $inter act ions ( as  we ll as  in $p p $ i ntera ctions )and ar e thu sexpected  to provide an addition al con tribu tio n of $\nu _e$ ’ s t o the hig h en ergy astro phy sic al ne utr i no fl ux.T he  en e rgy o f ne u trinos fr o mneu t r on s is suppre s s e d b y abo utt wo ord ersof magnitude comp a red with those  fro m pio n d e cay.  H owever, for aspe ct r a l index$\ gtrsim2$ as  in ourca s e, th is con tribut ion iss u bl e ading.  Neu tro ns also r esu lt from ph ot od i sinteg rati on  of he avy io n s
 contribution_to the_track flux (after oscillations)._The resultant_peak_flux is_larger_than the measured_flux at energies_just below the region_of interest for_IceCube’s_cascade analysis. From SU(2) symmetry there will be an $e^+e^-$ channel, leading to $\gamma$-rays_from_electroweak corrections_constrained_by_[*Fermi*]{}-LAT [@Murase:2015gea]. Finally, this fit_requires a short DM lifetime_which is_strongly constrained by the cosmic microwave background and_bounds_from the reionization_epoch, the best fit values being $\tau_\chi\sim10^{23}$ s, $m_\chi\sim10$_TeV [@Liu:2016cnk; @Slatyer:2016qyl]. All considered, DM decay_does not seem_to_resolve_this tension.

Several additional effects_could provide an energy and flavor_dependent modification of the standard neutrino_flux from an astrophysical source. For example,_the Glashow resonance occurs when a_$\bar\nu_e$ with $E_\nu=6.3$ PeV scatters_off an_electron in the ice creating_an on-shell $W^-$_[@Glashow:1960zz] increasing_IceCube’s sensitivity in_that energy range considerably. IceCube performs_their fits assuming_that $\mathcal{I}_\nu=\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu}$. While this is generally_the_case if neutrinos_are_mainly_produced through_$pp$ interactions, it_won’t_be the_case_if the main neutrino production channel_is_$p\gamma$ interactions [@Nunokawa:2016pop]. For the SPL case_$\mathcal{I}_{\nu_e}/\mathcal{I}_{\bar\nu_e}\simeq3.5$ which would somewhat_harden_the cascade spectrum, but_would not be enough to_reduce the tension of the fit.

Another_option that_could alleviate_the track vs. cascade fit tension is neutron decay sources. Neutrons decay_to $\bar\nu_e$’s and are produced alongside_charged pions in $p\gamma$_interactions (as_well_as in $pp$_interactions)_and are_thus expected to provide an additional contribution_of $\nu_e$’s_to the high energy astrophysical neutrino_flux. The energy of_neutrinos_from neutrons is suppressed by about_two orders of magnitude compared with_those from pion decay. However,_for_a_spectral index $\gtrsim2$ as in_our case, this contribution is subleading._Neutrons also result_from photodisintegration of heavy ions