 time. Because of this, pulse-front tilt and pulse-front curvature are only strictly proper names for these two couplings with no global chirp, and therefore angular dispersion or chromatic curvature are in a sense more general terms.

To illustrate more complex cases, the fourth STC we look at (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)) is a simple extension of the previous two couplings, where the spatio-spectral phase in the NF is now quadractic in frequency rather than linear (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(i)), i.e. $\hat{\phi}(x,y,\omega)=\zeta x (\omega-\omega_0)^2$. This can be understood as a transversely-varying linear temporal chirp, which in time corresponds to a transversely-varying pulse duration. This is also equivalent to the different colors having a wavefront tilt that varies quadratically with the frequency offset. In the focus this frequency-varying tilt manifests as a quadratically-varying best-focus position in the transverse dimension (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(iii)). In time at focus the pulse amplitude is quite complex, but the temporal phase no longer exhibits any chirp, because the chirps of different signs in the NF average-out at focus.

The summaries above and the quantitative visualizations in Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\] are on one hand relatively simple, and of low-order, but on the other hand can be quite difficult to digest in one sitting. However, understanding the difference between the spatio-spectral phases employed and the reasoning behind the relationships between time and frequency and also NF and FF is key to understanding STCs. This is true both of low-order STCs and those of arbitrary nature. All four of the cases in Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\] have unique effects in focus and also in time on the collimated beam, but have identical spatio-spectral amplitudes in the NF. In the NF, it is *only* the spatio-spectral phases that differentiate them. From a practical point of view this makes sense, since we often imagine STCs being induced on the collimated beam in the form of chromatic phase aberrations, but in the general case we must also be open to more complex field configurations. In the next section, we briefly discuss some physically relevant cases which involve
time. Because of this, pulse - front tilt and pulse - front curvature are only rigorously proper name for these two couplings with no global chirp, and consequently angular dispersion or chromatic curvature are in a common sense more general terms. 

 To exemplify more complex cases, the fourth STC we look at (Fig.   \[fig: all\_couplings\](d) ) is a simple propagation of the previous two couplings, where the spatio - apparitional phase in the NF is now quadractic in frequency rather than linear (Fig.   \[fig: all\_couplings\](d)(i) ), i.e. $ \hat{\phi}(x, y,\omega)=\zeta x (\omega-\omega_0)^2$. This can be understood as a transversely - vary linear temporal chirp, which in time corresponds to a transversely - varying pulsation duration. This is also equivalent to the different colors have a wavefront tilt that varies quadratically with the frequency set-back. In the focus this frequency - change tilt manifests as a quadratically - varying best - focus stead in the transverse dimension (Fig.   \[fig: all\_couplings\](d)(iii) ). In time at focus the pulse amplitude is quite complex, but the temporal phase no longer exhibits any chirp, because the chirps of different signs in the NF average - out at focus. 

 The summaries above and the quantitative visualizations in Fig.   \[fig: all\_couplings\ ] are on one hand relatively simple, and of low - order, but on the early hired hand can be quite difficult to digest in one seance. However, understand the remainder between the spatio - spectral phases employed and the reasoning behind the relationships between time and frequency and also NF and FF is key to sympathize STCs. This is true both of low - order STCs and those of arbitrary nature. All four of the cases in Fig.   \[fig: all\_couplings\ ] get unique effects in focus and also in time on the collimated beam, but get identical spatio - apparitional amplitudes in the NF. In the NF, it is * only * the spatio - spectral phases that differentiate them. From a practical point of view this reach sense, since we often imagine STCs being induce on the collimated balance beam in the form of chromatic phase aberrations, but in the cosmopolitan case we must also be open to more complex field configuration. In the next incision, we briefly discuss some physically relevant case which involve
 tile. Because of this, pulse-nront tilt and polwe-fronv curvafure are only strictly proper names hor rhese two couplings with no global cjirp, and thecefore angular dmapersiok or dmromacir curvature are in a sensa more general tdrls.

To illustrate more complex cases, ehe fouttj STC we look wt (Fpg. \[sig:aml\_couplings\](d)) is a simple extension of the previous two couplings, where the spatil-speftral phase in the NF is now wuadwqctic in freduency rather than lingar (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(i)), i.e. $\hat{\pfi}(x,y,\okega)=\zeta x (\onegw-\mmega_0)^2$. This ran be understood as a tratsverseky-varying linesr vempiral chirp, which in tmme corresponds to a transvervemy-varying pulse dyrqtion. Thiv is qlsu esumvament tl tie differenf colors hacing a wavefront tikt nnat varies qhadratycwlly with the frequency offset. In the fmcua this frequency-varying tilt manifests as a euadraticwlly-varying best-focus position in the transverse gimenakon (Flg. \[fie:qlp\_couplings\](d)(iii)). In time at focus the pulse ampjjtidv is quite complew, but the temporal pjaxg no longer exfibits ang chirp, because thf chirpf of eifferent sigms in the NF average-out at docus.

The sumiqries above and thz quantitatire visoalizayions in Fig. \[fig:all\_couplnngs\] ade on one hwnd relatjxely simple, and uf kof-order, but on the other hagd can be quice diffizult to didest in onf sitbhng. However, undershandiug tha differenfe between the spatio-spectral pieses employed atd nhe reasouing bchind the relatyonships betwegn time aud freduency and also NH and FF is hey to undersdwnding STCs. Vhis is twue voth of low-ufder STCs and yhose of cxbitrary bature. All four of thg dases in Fig. \[fig:cuo\_couplings\] have unkquq vffxcts yt focus and dlso in yime un the colllmaged neam, but have identiwal apatio-spectral ampkibudes in jhe NF. In the NF, it is *only* the spatio-sptctral pheses tnat differentiate them. From a pradtical polnt of view thif majes sense, siuce we often imagine STCs being induced in the collimated veam in the form of ghromatic phese abqrrations, but in the general xase we must also be open to more compmex fiald clnfigurations. In the next section, we briefly discuss some physically relecant cesqs which inbolvr
time. Because of this, pulse-front tilt and are strictly proper for these two and angular dispersion or curvature are in sense more general terms. To illustrate complex cases, the fourth STC we look at (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)) is a simple of the previous two couplings, where the spatio-spectral phase in the NF is quadractic frequency than (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(i)), i.e. $\hat{\phi}(x,y,\omega)=\zeta x (\omega-\omega_0)^2$. This can be understood as a transversely-varying linear temporal chirp, in time corresponds to a transversely-varying pulse duration. is also equivalent to different colors having a wavefront that quadratically with frequency In focus this frequency-varying manifests as a quadratically-varying best-focus position in the transverse dimension (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(iii)). In time at focus the amplitude is but the phase longer any chirp, because of different signs in the NF The summaries above and the quantitative visualizations in \[fig:all\_couplings\] are one hand relatively simple, and of but on the other hand can be quite to digest in one sitting. However, understanding the difference between the spatio-spectral phases employed and behind the relationships between and frequency and NF FF key understanding STCs. is true both of low-order STCs and those of arbitrary nature. four of the cases in Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\] have unique effects and in time on collimated beam, but have spatio-spectral in the NF. In it *only* that them. a practical point of this makes sense, since we imagine STCs being induced the form of chromatic phase aberrations, but in general case we must also be open more complex field configurations. In the next section, we briefly discuss some relevant cases
 time. Because of this, pulse-froNt tilt and pUlse-fRonT cuRvAturE are Only strictly prOPer nAmes for these two couplinGs witH nO GlobAL cHirp, aNd thereFOrE ANguLaR dIspErSIoN or chRomAtic curVature are iN a sEnSe more generaL TeRms.

To illusTraTe more compleX caSes, the FoUrtH sTC we LooK at (FiG. \[fig:alL\_CoupliNgs\](d)) is a siMpLE extenSIon of thE PReViouS two couplings, wherE ThE Spatio-spectral Phase iN tHE Nf IS noW quAdractic in FrEquenCY rather THaN LINeaR (fig. \[fig:all\_coupLings\](d)(i)), i.e. $\haT{\Phi}(X,y,\omegA)=\zEta X (\Omega-\oMega_0)^2$. THiS Can Be understooD as a TransversEly-varYIng lineAR temporAl chirP, whIch In tiME cOrResPoNDs tO A tRanSVerSely-varyInG pUlse dUratION. tHis iS alSo eqUivalEnt to the diffeRenT colORs hAving A waveFronT tIlt thAt variEs quaDrAtically with the FreqUency offsEt. IN tHe fOcUs thiS FrequeNcy-VarYing tilT manifeSTs aS a QUADrAtically-varying besT-fOCUs Position In the tRAnSvERse dimenSiOn (FIg. \[fiG:ALl\_couPlinGS\](d)(Iii)). In timE at focUS tHe Pulse amPlItude iS qUitE coMplex, BUt thE tempoRal phase No lonGEr exhibits any cHIrp, because the CHiRPS oF DiffEreNt signs in thE NF aVEragE-out AT fOcuS.

the suMmariEs ABoVE and the quantitative ViSualizAtionS in Fig. \[fig:all\_cOuplings\] arE ON One hand rElatIVeLY simple, and of loW-ordeR, but on the oTHer hand cAn be qUite diffIcult to diGESt in one sIttIng. howEveR, UNdErstanding the DIFferEnCe betweEn tHe spatiO-spEctRal PhaSeS employed And the reAsOnInG bEhiNd the RElationsHiPs bEtWeeN time ANd freqUency And aLsO Nf And fF is key TO uNDErstAnDiNg STcs. THiS is trUe boTH of Low-ordeR STCs and tHosE Of arBiTrAry natuRe. All four of thE cAses in Fig. \[fIg:All\_CoupliNGS\] have uniQue effects in focus and alsO In time oN thE collImatEd beam, but HavE identIcaL Spatio-SpectrAl ampLiTudES In the nf. in The nF, It is *only* thE SPatIo-speCtRal pHases thAt differentiate theM. froM a practical poInt Of viEW ThIs mAKeS SenSe, SIncE WE often imagine STcs being indUcED oN the collimATed BeAm in the Form of cHromaTIc phase AberratioNs, but in thE gEnerAL CasE we must alsO be open tO more compLEx fieLD cOnfigUraTions. IN tHe nExt seCtion, wE BriEfly dIscuss SoMe physIcallY rElevant cAses which involve
 time. Because of this, pu lse-fronttiltand  pu ls e-fr ontcurvature areo nlystrictly proper namesfor t he s e tw o  c oupli ngs wit h  n o glo ba lchi rp ,  a nd th ere fore an gular disp ers io n or chromat i ccurvatureare  in a sensemor e gene ra l t e rms.
To  illu strate more c omplex ca se s , thef ourth S T C  w e lo ok at (Fig. \[fig : al l \_couplings\]( d)) is  a si m p leext ension ofth e pre v ious tw o  c o u p lin g s, where thespatio-spec t ral  phase  i n t h e NF i s now  q u adr actic in fr eque ncy rathe r than linear( Fig. \[ fig:al l\_ cou plin g s\ ]( d)( i) ) , i . e.  $\ h at{ \phi}(x, y, \o mega) =\ze t a x  (\o meg a-\o mega_ 0)^2$. This c anbe u n der stood  as a  tra ns verse ly-var yingli near temporal c hirp , which i n t im e c or respo n ds toa t ran sversel y-varyi n g p ul s e du ration. This is al so e qu ivalentto the di ff e rent col or s h avin g a wav efro n ttilt tha t vari e squ adratic al ly wit hthe  fr equen c y of fset.In the f ocust his frequency- v arying tilt m a ni f e st s  asa q uadraticall y-va r ying  bes t -f ocu s  posi tionin th e  transverse dimensi on  (Fig.  \[fi g:all\_coupli ngs\](d)(i i i ) ). In ti me a t  f o cus the pulseampli tude is qu i te compl ex, b ut the t emporal p h a se no lo nge r e xhi bit s an y chirp, beca u s e th echirpsofdiffere ntsig nsinth e NF aver age-outat  f oc us .
The s u mmariesab ove  a ndthe q u antita tivevisu al iz a tio ns in F i g. \ [fig :a ll \_co upl in gs\]areo n o ne hand  relative lys impl e,  a nd of l ow-order, but  o n the othe rhan d canb e  quite d ifficult to digest in o n e sitti ng.  Howe ver,  understa ndi ng the  di f ferenc e betw een t he  sp a t io-sp e c tr alph ases emplo y e d a nd th ereas oning b ehind the relation s hip s between tim e a nd f r e qu enc y  a n d a ls o  NF a nd FF is key to  understan di n gSTCs. This istr ue both  of low -orde r  STCs a nd thoseof arbitr ar y na t u re.  All fourof the c ases in F i g. \[ f ig :all\ _co upling s\ ] h ave u niquee ffe cts i n focu sand al so in  t ime on t he collimated beam, but  haveident ica l spatio- spe c tra l amplitu desin the NF.  In  th e NF,  it is *o nly* th e s p atio- spec t ral phase s  t hat d if ferentiatet h e m.Froma p r actica l po int of view thism akes sense, si ncew e  of ten imag in e STCs being i ndu ce d on the c ol limated bea m in the  f o rm of  chrom atic p hase ab e r ra t ions,butinthe gener alca s e we mu st  a l so beopen  t o more  compl e x fi e l d configurations . Int h e nex t  se ction ,we brie f ly d iscuss som e physicall y rele vant  case s which  i nvolve 
 time._Because of_this, pulse-front tilt and_pulse-front curvature_are_only strictly_proper_names for these_two couplings with_no global chirp, and_therefore angular dispersion_or_chromatic curvature are in a sense more general terms.

To illustrate more complex cases, the_fourth_STC we_look_at_(Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)) is a simple extension_of the previous two couplings,_where the_spatio-spectral phase in the NF is now quadractic_in_frequency rather than_linear (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(i)), i.e. $\hat{\phi}(x,y,\omega)=\zeta x (\omega-\omega_0)^2$. This can be_understood as a transversely-varying linear temporal_chirp, which in_time_corresponds_to a transversely-varying pulse_duration. This is also equivalent to_the different colors having a wavefront_tilt that varies quadratically with the frequency_offset. In the focus this frequency-varying_tilt manifests as a quadratically-varying_best-focus position_in the transverse dimension (Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\](d)(iii))._In time at_focus the_pulse amplitude is_quite complex, but the temporal phase_no longer exhibits_any chirp, because the chirps of_different_signs in the_NF_average-out_at focus.

The_summaries above and_the_quantitative visualizations_in_Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\] are on one hand relatively_simple,_and of low-order, but on the other_hand can be quite_difficult_to digest in one_sitting. However, understanding the difference_between the spatio-spectral phases employed and_the reasoning_behind the_relationships between time and frequency and also NF and FF is_key to understanding STCs. This is_true both of low-order_STCs and_those_of arbitrary nature._All_four of_the cases in Fig. \[fig:all\_couplings\] have unique effects_in focus_and also in time on the_collimated beam, but have_identical_spatio-spectral amplitudes in the NF. In_the NF, it is *only* the_spatio-spectral phases that differentiate them._From_a_practical point of view this_makes sense, since we often imagine_STCs being induced_on the collimated beam in the form_of_chromatic phase aberrations, but in the_general_case we must also be open_to_more_complex field configurations. In the_next section, we briefly discuss some_physically relevant cases which involve