 R. J. Scalise, and P. Wentzler, [Astrophys. J.]{} [**516**]{}, 425 (1999).

J. D. Anderson, G. Giampieri, P. A. Laing, and E. L. Lau, work in progress. R. F. C. Vessot, “Space experiments with high stability clocks,” in proceedings of the “Workshop on the Scientific Applications of Clocks in Space,” (November 7-8, 1996. Pasadena, CA). Edited by L. Maleki. JPL Publication 97-15 (JPL, Pasadena, CA, 1997), p. 67.

O. J. Sovers and C. S. Jacobs, [*Observational Model and Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software “MODEST” - 1996*]{}, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technical Report 83-39, Rev. 6 (1996).

J. I. Katz, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**83**]{}, 1892 (1999).

There is an intuitive way to understand this. Set up a coordinate system at the closest axial point of an RTG pair. Have the antenna be in the (+z,-x) direction, and the RTG pair in the positive x direction. Then from the RTGs the antenna is in 1/4 of a sphere (positive z and negative x). The ‘antenna occupies about 1/3 of 180 degrees in azimuthal angle. Its form is the base part of the parabola. Thus, it resembles a “flat” triangle of the same width, producing another factor of $\sim (1/2-2/3)$ compared to the angular size of a rectangle. It occupies of order (1/4-1/3) of the latitudinal-angle phase space angle of 90$^o$. This yields a total reduction factor of $\sim(1/96-2/108)$, or about 1 to 2 %.

The value of 1.5% is obtained by doing an explicit calculation of the solid angle subtended by the antenna from the middle of the RTG modules using the Pioneer’s physical dimensions. V. J. Slabinski of USNO independently obtained a figure of 1.6%.

Our high estimate of 40 W is not compromised by imprecise geometry. If the RTGs were completely in the plane of the top of the dish, then the maximum factor multiplying the 40 W
R. J. Scalise, and P. Wentzler, [ Astrophys. J. ] { } [ * * 516 * * ] { }, 425 (1999). 

 J.   D. Anderson, G. Giampieri, P.   A. Laing, and E.   L. Lau, work in progress. R.   F.   C. Vessot, “ Space experiments with eminent constancy clocks, ” in proceedings of the “ Workshop on the Scientific Applications of Clocks in Space, ” (November 7 - 8, 1996. Pasadena, CA). edit by L. Maleki. JPL Publication 97 - 15 (JPL, Pasadena, CA, 1997), p. 67. 

 O. J. Sovers and C. S. Jacobs, [ * Observational Model and Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software “ MODEST ” - 1996 * ] { }, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technical Report 83 - 39, Rev. 6 (1996). 

 J. I. Katz, Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 83 * * ] { }, 1892 (1999). 

 There be an intuitive way to understand this. set up up a coordinate organization at the closest axile item of an RTG pair. Have the antenna be in the (+ z,-x) commission, and the RTG pair in the positive adam commission. Then from the RTGs the antenna is in 1/4 of a sphere (incontrovertible z and negative x). The ‘ antenna busy about 1/3 of 180 degrees in azimuthal angle. Its shape is the base part of the parabola. Thus, it resembles a “ categoric ” triangle of the same width, producing another factor of $ \sim (1/2 - 2/3)$ compared to the angular size of a rectangle. It absorb of order (1/4 - 1/3) of the latitudinal - angle phase space angle of 90$^o$. This yields a total reduction factor of $ \sim(1/96 - 2/108)$, or about 1 to 2% . 

 The value of 1.5% is obtained by doing an explicit calculation of the solid angle subtended by the antenna from the middle of the RTG modules use the Pioneer ’s physical dimensions. V. J. Slabinski of USNO independently prevail a figure of 1.6% . 

 Our high estimate of 40 W is not compromised by imprecise geometry. If the RTGs were wholly in the plane of the circus tent of the dish, then the maximum agent multiplying the 40 W
 R. U. Scalise, and P. Wentzler, [Astrophys. J.]{} [**516**]{}, 425 (1999).

L. E. Andecson, G. Fiampierk, P. A. Laing, and E. L. Lau, work ii prigresw. R. F. C. Vessot, “Space expdriments aith higy stebility clocks,” ii proceedings kn the “Xorkshop on the Scientifiw Applications ow Elocks in Space,” (November 7-8, 1996. Pasadena, SA). Editrd by L. Maleki. JKL Punjicafpok 97-15 (JPL, Pasadena, CA, 1997), p. 67.

O. J. Sovers and C. V. Jacobs, [*Obsetvational Model and Parameher Oartials for the JOL VLBI Parqmetqe Estimation Software “MODEST” - 1996*]{}, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technicau Repprt 83-39, Rev. 6 (1996).

H. U. Kwjz, Phys. Rev. Oett. [**83**]{}, 1892 (1999).

There is ak intuidive wau to understanc tiis. Wet up a coordinate sbstem at the closest axial pohnc of an RTG pair. Have tye anjenna be kb tfe (+e,-x) virsction, anv the RTG pzir in the positive x directiom. Eyen from the DTGs tre antenna is in 1/4 of a sphere (positive z dnd negative x). The ‘antenna occupies about 1/3 of 180 fegrees ig azimuthal angle. Its form is the base part of tha parebula. Tmus, kr gesembles a “flat” triangle of the same width, pwkdicpng another factov of $\sim (1/2-2/3)$ compared tl yre angular siee of a redtangle. It occupied of orqer (1/4-1/3) if the lauitudonal-angle phase space angle of 90$^o$. This ypeldw a total reductiou factor of $\rim(1/96-2/108)$, pr abput 1 to 2 %.

The value of 1.5% ns obtzined by dolng an exluicit calculatiov on tve solid angle subtended br the antxnna yrom the midcle of the RTG mldules using the Pioneer’d phydiwal dimenslons. V. J. Slabinski of USNO inde'xndently obtaonad d figure of 1.6%.

Omr high estimatq of 40 W is not comproiised by imprecpse geomevry. If the REGs were compngtely in the 'lane of ehe rop if the aksh, then the msximum fabtjr myltiplying the 40 W
R. J. Scalise, and P. Wentzler, [Astrophys. 425 J. D. G. Giampieri, P. Lau, in progress. R. C. Vessot, “Space with high stability clocks,” in proceedings the “Workshop on the Scientific Applications of Clocks in Space,” (November 7-8, 1996. CA). Edited by L. Maleki. JPL Publication 97-15 (JPL, Pasadena, CA, 1997), p. O. Sovers C. Jacobs, [*Observational Model and Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software “MODEST” - 1996*]{}, Propulsion Laboratory Technical Report 83-39, Rev. 6 (1996). I. Katz, Phys. Rev. [**83**]{}, 1892 (1999). There is intuitive to understand Set a system at the axial point of an RTG pair. Have the antenna be in the (+z,-x) direction, and the RTG in the direction. Then the the is in 1/4 sphere (positive z and negative x). about 1/3 of 180 degrees in azimuthal angle. form is base part of the parabola. Thus, resembles a “flat” triangle of the same width, another factor of $\sim (1/2-2/3)$ compared to the angular size of a rectangle. It occupies (1/4-1/3) of the latitudinal-angle space angle of This a reduction of $\sim(1/96-2/108)$, about 1 to 2 %. The value of 1.5% is obtained doing an explicit calculation of the solid angle subtended by from middle of the modules using the Pioneer’s dimensions. J. Slabinski of USNO a of estimate 40 is not compromised by geometry. If the RTGs were in the plane of then the maximum factor multiplying the 40 W
 R. J. Scalise, and P. Wentzler, [AstrOphys. J.]{} [**516**]{}, 425 (1999).

J. D. AnDersoN, G. GIamPiEri, P. a. LaiNg, and E. L. Lau, work IN proGress. R. F. C. Vessot, “Space expErimeNtS With HIgH stabIlity clOCkS,” IN prOcEeDinGs OF tHe “WorKshOp on the scientific appLiCations of CloCKs In Space,” (NovEmbEr 7-8, 1996. Pasadena, CA). ediTed by L. maLekI. jPL PuBliCatioN 97-15 (JPL, PaSAdena, Ca, 1997), p. 67.

O. J. SoverS aND C. S. JacOBs, [*ObserVATiOnal model and Parameter pArTIals for the JPL VlBI ParAmETeR eStiMatIon SoftwarE “MoDEST” - 1996*]{}, jEt PropuLSiON lAboRAtory TechnicaL Report 83-39, Rev. 6 (1996).

J. i. katZ, Phys. REv. letT. [**83**]{}, 1892 (1999).

there iS an inTuITivE way to underStanD this. Set uP a coorDInate sySTem at thE closeSt aXiaL poiNT oF aN RTg pAIr. HAVe The ANteNna be in tHe (+Z,-x) DirecTion, AND THe RTg paIr in The poSitive x directIon. then FRom The RTgs the AnteNnA is in 1/4 Of a sphEre (poSiTive z and negativE x). ThE ‘antenna oCcuPiEs aBoUt 1/3 of 180 dEGrees iN azImuThal angLe. Its foRM is ThE BASe Part of the parabola. THuS, IT rEsembles A “flat” tRIaNgLE of the saMe WidTh, prODUcing AnotHEr Factor of $\Sim (1/2-2/3)$ comPArEd To the anGuLar sizE oF a rEctAngle. iT occUpies oF order (1/4-1/3) of The laTItudinal-angle pHAse space angle OF 90$^o$. tHIs YIeldS a tOtal reductiOn faCTor oF $\sim(1/96-2/108)$, OR aBouT 1 To 2 %.

The Value Of 1.5% IS oBTained by doing an explIcIt calcUlatiOn of the solid aNgle subtenDED By the antEnna FRoM The middle of the rTG moDules using THe PioneeR’s phySical dimEnsions. V. J. sLAbinski oF USnO iNdePenDENtLy obtained a fiGURe of 1.6%.

ouR high esTimAte of 40 W iS noT coMprOmiSeD by imprecIse geomeTrY. IF tHe rTGS were COmpletelY iN thE pLanE of thE Top of tHe disH, theN tHe MAxiMum factOR mULTiplYiNg The 40 W
 R. J. Scalise, and P. Wen tzler, [As troph ys.  J. ]{ } [* *516 **]{}, 425 (19 9 9).
J. D. Anderson, G. Gi ampie ri ,  P.A .Laing , and E .  L . Lau ,wo rkin pr ogres s.R. F. C . Vessot,“Sp ac e experiment s  w ith high s tab ility clocks ,”in pro ce edi n gs of  th e “Wo rkshop on the  Scientif ic Applic a tions o f Cl ocks  in Space,” (Nove m be r  7-8, 1996. Pa sadena ,C A) . Edi ted  by L. Mal ek i. JP L  Public a ti o n 97- 1 5 (JPL, Pasad ena, CA, 19 9 7),  p. 67 .
O. J. Sov ers a nd C.S. Jacobs,[*Ob servation al Mod e l and P a rameter  Parti als  fo r th e  J PL  VL BI Par a me ter Est imationSo ft ware“MOD E S T ”  - 1 996 *]{} , Jet  Propulsion L abo rato r y T echni cal R epor t83-39 , Rev.  6 (1 99 6).

J. I. Katz , Ph ys. Rev.Let t.  [* *8 3**]{ } , 1892  (1 999 ).

The re is a n  in tu i t i ve  way to understand  t h i s.  Set upa coor d in at e  systemat  th e cl o s est a xial po int of a n RTGp ai r.  Have t he  anten na  be  in  the( +z,- x) dir ection,and t h e RTG pair int he positive x di r e ct i on.The n from theRTGs theante n na  is in 1/ 4 ofas ph e re (positive z andne gative  x).The ‘antennaoccupies a b o u t 1/3 of  180 de g rees in azimut hal a ngle. Itsf orm is t he ba se partof the pa r a bola. Th us,  it  re sem b l es  a “flat” tri a n gleof  the sa mewidth,pro duc ing  an ot her facto r of $\s im  ( 1/ 2- 2/3 )$ co m pared to  t hean gul ar si z e of a  rect angl e.  I t  oc cupieso fo r der(1 /4 -1/3 ) o fthe l atit u din al-angl e phase s pac e  ang le  o f 90$^o $. This yield sa total re du cti on fac t o r of $\s im(1/96-2/108)$, or abo u t 1 to2 % .

Th e va lue of 1. 5%is obt ain e d by d oing a n exp li cit c alcul a t io n o fthe solida n gle  subt en dedby theantenna from the m i ddl e of the RTGmod ules u si ngt he Pio ne e r’s p hysical dimensi ons. V. J.  S l ab inski of U S NOin depende ntly ob taine d  a figu re of 1.6 %.

Our h ig h es t i mat e of 40 Wis not c ompromise d  by i m pr ecise  ge ometry .Ifthe R TGs we r e c omple tely i nthe pl ane o fthe topof the dish, then the m aximum  fact ormultiplyi ngt he40 W
 R._J. Scalise,_and P. Wentzler, [Astrophys._J.]{} [**516**]{},_425_(1999).

J. D. Anderson,_G._Giampieri, P. A. Laing,_and E. L. Lau,_work in progress. R. F. C._Vessot, “Space experiments_with_high stability clocks,” in proceedings of the “Workshop on the Scientific Applications of Clocks_in_Space,” (November_7-8,_1996._Pasadena, CA). Edited by L._Maleki. JPL Publication 97-15 (JPL,_Pasadena, CA,_1997), p. 67.

O. J. Sovers and C. S._Jacobs,_[*Observational Model and_Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software_“MODEST” - 1996*]{}, Jet Propulsion Laboratory_Technical Report 83-39,_Rev._6_(1996).

J. I. Katz, Phys._Rev. Lett. [**83**]{}, 1892 (1999).

There is_an intuitive way to understand this._Set up a coordinate system at the_closest axial point of an RTG_pair. Have the antenna be_in the_(+z,-x) direction, and the RTG_pair in the_positive x_direction. Then from_the RTGs the antenna is in_1/4 of a_sphere (positive z and negative x)._The_‘antenna occupies about_1/3_of_180 degrees_in azimuthal angle._Its_form is_the_base part of the parabola. Thus,_it_resembles a “flat” triangle of the same_width, producing another factor_of_$\sim (1/2-2/3)$ compared to_the angular size of a_rectangle. It occupies of order (1/4-1/3)_of the_latitudinal-angle phase_space angle of 90$^o$. This yields a total reduction factor of_$\sim(1/96-2/108)$, or about 1 to 2_%.

The value of 1.5%_is obtained_by_doing an explicit_calculation_of the_solid angle subtended by the antenna from_the middle_of the RTG modules using the_Pioneer’s physical dimensions. V._J._Slabinski of USNO independently obtained a_figure of 1.6%.

Our high estimate of_40 W is not compromised_by_imprecise_geometry. If the RTGs were_completely in the plane of the_top of the_dish, then the maximum factor multiplying the_40_W