\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, \Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
  {\rm Tr}\, \Big\{ {\cal S}^{(c)}_{\lambda}\, 
  \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,, \nonumber\\*
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, \Gamma\, i\overrightarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
  {\rm Tr}\, \Big\{ {\cal S}^{(b)}_{\lambda}\, 
  \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,.\end{aligned}$$ This is the analogue of Eq. (\[1/mc1\]), except that in the present case $$\label{1/mc22}
{\cal S}^{(Q)}_{\lambda} = \zeta_1^{(Q)} v_\lambda + \zeta_2^{(Q)} 
  v'_\lambda + \zeta_3^{(Q)} \gamma_\lambda \,.$$ The functions $\zeta_i^{(Q)}(w)$ have mass dimension one. The heavy quark equation of motion yield $$\begin{aligned}
\label{constbr1}
w\, \zeta_1^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_3^{(c)} &=& 0 \,,{\nonumber}\\*
\zeta_1^{(b)} + w\, \zeta_2^{(b)} - \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ Eq. (\[momcons\]) implies ${\cal S}^{(c)}_\lambda+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\lambda = 
(\bar\Lambda v_\lambda-\bar\Lambda^*v'_\lambda)\, \zeta$, which gives three more relations $$\begin{aligned}
\label{constbr2}
\zeta_1^{(c)} + \zeta_1^{(b)} &=& \bar\Lambda\, \zeta \,, \nonumber\\*
  \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(b)} &=& -\bar\Lambda^*\, \zeta \,, \nonumber\\
  \zeta_3^{(c)} + \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ These relations express the $\zeta_j^{(b)}$’s in terms of the $\zeta_j^{(c)}$’s. Combining Eqs. (\[constbr1\]) with (\[constbr2\]) yields $$\begin{
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, \Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v & = & 
   { \rm Tr}\, \Big\ { { \cal S}^{(c)}_{\lambda}\, 
   \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\ } \, , \nonumber\\ * 
 \bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, \Gamma\, i\overrightarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, h^{(b)}_v & = & 
   { \rm Tr}\, \Big\ { { \cal S}^{(b)}_{\lambda}\, 
   \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\ } \,.\end{aligned}$$ This is the analogue of Eq.   (\[1 / mc1\ ]), except that in the present case $ $ \label{1 / mc22 } 
 { \cal S}^{(Q)}_{\lambda } = \zeta_1^{(Q) } v_\lambda + \zeta_2^{(Q) } 
   v'_\lambda + \zeta_3^{(Q) } \gamma_\lambda \,.$$ The functions $ \zeta_i^{(Q)}(w)$ have mass property one. The dense quark equation of motion yield $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{constbr1 } 
 w\, \zeta_1^{(c) } + \zeta_2^{(c) } + \zeta_3^{(c) } & = & 0 \,,{\nonumber}\\ * 
 \zeta_1^{(b) } + w\, \zeta_2^{(b) } - \zeta_3^{(b) } & = & 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ Eq.   (\[momcons\ ]) imply $ { \cal S}^{(c)}_\lambda+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\lambda = 
 (\bar\Lambda v_\lambda-\bar\Lambda^*v'_\lambda)\, \zeta$, which gives three more relations $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{constbr2 } 
 \zeta_1^{(c) } + \zeta_1^{(b) } & = & \bar\Lambda\, \zeta \, , \nonumber\\ * 
   \zeta_2^{(c) } + \zeta_2^{(b) } & = & -\bar\Lambda^*\, \zeta \, , \nonumber\\ 
   \zeta_3^{(c) } + \zeta_3^{(b) } & = & 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ These relation press out the $ \zeta_j^{(b)}$ ’s in terms of the $ \zeta_j^{(c)}$ ’s. unite Eqs.   (\[constbr1\ ]) with (\[constbr2\ ]) yields $ $ \begin {
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lamnda}\, \Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
  {\tm Tr}\, \Bij\{ {\cal S}^{(d)}_{\lambda}\, 
  \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,, \nonumuer\\*
\bqr h^{(c)}_{c'}\, \Gamma\, i\overrightarrod D_{\!\lambda}\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
  {\rn Tr}\, \Vig\{ {\cal S}^{(b)}_{\lambda}\, 
  \bar K_{b'}\, \Gamke\, H_v \Big\} \,.\end{alinned}$$ This iv the analogue ow Zq. (\[1/mc1\]), except that in the present case $$\label{1/mv22}
{\cwl S}^{(Q)}_{\lambda} = \zgta_1^{(Q)} n_\lwmbdz + \zeta_2^{(Q)} 
  v'_\lambda + \zeta_3^{(Q)} \gamma_\lamgda \,.$$ Tht functions $\zeta_i^{(Q)}(e)$ have mass dimension one. Hhe jeavy quark equatiln of motiob yiqod $$\begin{aligved}
\label{constbr1}
w\, \zeta_1^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_3^{(c)} &=& 0 \,,{\nonumber}\\*
\zeta_1^{(b)} + w\, \zeca_2^{(b)} - \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\wnd{wnigned}$$ Eq. (\[moncons\]) implies ${\cal S}^{(c)}_\lambdd+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\kambda = 
(\bar\Lamnda v_\namvda-\bar\Lambda^*v'_\lambda)\, \zxta$, which gives threg more reldtnons $$\begin{aligned}
\labeo{cinstbt2}
\zeta_1^{(w)} + \zdra_1^{(b)} &=& \bzr\Kajbda\, \zfta \,, \nonumber\\*
  \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zera_2^{(b)} &=& -\bar\Lambda^*\, \zeta \,, \ginumber\\
  \zeta_3^{(d)} + \zetw_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ These relations express tve $\aeta_j^{(b)}$’s in terms of the $\zeta_j^{(c)}$’s. Combining Eqd. (\[constbr1\]) rith (\[constbr2\]) yields $$\begin{
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, \Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v &=& \Big\{ S}^{(c)}_{\lambda}\, \bar \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} i\overrightarrow h^{(b)}_v &=& {\rm \Big\{ {\cal S}^{(b)}_{\lambda}\, K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,.\end{aligned}$$ This the analogue of Eq. (\[1/mc1\]), except that in the present case $$\label{1/mc22} {\cal = \zeta_1^{(Q)} v_\lambda + \zeta_2^{(Q)} v'_\lambda + \zeta_3^{(Q)} \gamma_\lambda \,.$$ The functions $\zeta_i^{(Q)}(w)$ mass one. heavy equation of motion yield $$\begin{aligned} \label{constbr1} w\, \zeta_1^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_3^{(c)} &=& 0 \,,{\nonumber}\\* \zeta_1^{(b)} w\, \zeta_2^{(b)} - \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ Eq. implies ${\cal S}^{(c)}_\lambda+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\lambda (\bar\Lambda v_\lambda-\bar\Lambda^*v'_\lambda)\, \zeta$, which gives more $$\begin{aligned} \label{constbr2} + &=& \zeta \,, \nonumber\\* + \zeta_2^{(b)} &=& -\bar\Lambda^*\, \zeta \,, \nonumber\\ \zeta_3^{(c)} + \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ These relations express the in terms $\zeta_j^{(c)}$’s. Combining (\[constbr1\]) (\[constbr2\]) $$\begin{
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lambDa}\, \Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
  {\Rm Tr}\, \BIg\{ {\cAl S}^{(C)}_{\lAmbdA}\, 
  \bar k_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,, \noNUmbeR\\*
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, \Gamma\, i\overrightArrow d_{\!\lAMbda}\, H^{(B)}_v &=&
  {\Rm Tr}\, \BIg\{ {\cal S}^{(b)}_{\LAmBDA}\, 
  \baR K_{V'}\, \GAmmA\, H_V \biG\} \,.\end{aLigNed}$$ This Is the analoGue Of eq. (\[1/mc1\]), except thAT iN the presenT caSe $$\label{1/mc22}
{\cal s}^{(Q)}_{\lAmbda} = \zEtA_1^{(Q)} v_\LAmbda + \ZetA_2^{(Q)} 
  v'_\laMbda + \zeTA_3^{(Q)} \gammA_\lambda \,.$$ ThE fUNctionS $\Zeta_i^{(Q)}(w)$ HAVe Mass Dimension one. The heAVy QUark equation of Motion YiELd $$\BEGin{AliGned}
\label{cOnStbr1}
w\, \ZEta_1^{(c)} + \zetA_2^{(C)} + \zETA_3^{(C)} &=& 0 \,,{\noNUmber}\\*
\zeta_1^{(b)} + w\, \zeTa_2^{(b)} - \zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{ALigNed}$$ Eq. (\[mOmConS\]) ImplieS ${\cal S}^{(C)}_\lAMbdA+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\lambdA = 
(\bar\lambda v_\laMbda-\baR\lambda^*v'_\LAmbda)\, \zeTa$, whicH giVes ThreE MoRe RelAtIOns $$\BEgIn{aLIgnEd}
\label{cOnStBr2}
\zetA_1^{(c)} + \zeTA_1^{(B)} &=& \BAr\LaMbdA\, \zetA \,, \nonuMber\\*
  \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(B)} &=& -\baR\LamBDa^*\, \zEta \,, \noNumbeR\\
  \zetA_3^{(c)} + \Zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\End{aliGned}$$ THeSe relations exprEss tHe $\zeta_j^{(b)}$’s In tErMs oF tHe $\zetA_J^{(c)}$’s. ComBinIng eqs. (\[consTbr1\]) with (\[COnsTbR2\]) YIElDs $$\begin{
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, i\over leftarrowD_{\! \la mbd a} \, \ Gamm a\, h^{(b)}_v& =&
 {\rm Tr}\, \Big\{ {\c al S} ^{ ( c)}_ { \l ambda }\, 
 \ ba r K_{ v' }\ , \ Ga m ma \, H_ v \ Big\} \ ,, \nonumb er\ \* 
\bar h^{(c) } _{ v'}\, \Gam ma\ , i\overrigh tar row D_ {\ !\l a mbda} \,h^{(b )}_v & = &
  {\ rm Tr}\,\B i g\{ {\ c al S}^{ ( b )} _{\l ambda}\, 
  \barK _{ v '}\, \Gamma\,H_v \B ig \ }\ , .\e nd{ aligned}$$  T his i s  the an a lo g u e  of Eq. (\[1/mc1\ ]), exceptt hat  in th epre s ent ca se $$ \l a bel {1/mc22}
{\ calS}^{(Q)}_ {\lamb d a} = \z e ta_1^{( Q)} v_ \la mbd a +\ ze ta _2^ {( Q )} v'_ \ lam bda + \z et a_ 3^{(Q )} \ g a m m a_\l amb da \ ,.$$The functions  $\ zeta _ i^{ (Q)}( w)$ h avema ss di mensio n one .The heavy quark  equ ation ofmot io n y ie ld $$ \ begin{ ali gne d}
\lab el{cons t br1 }w \ ,  \ zeta_1^{(c)} + \ze ta _ 2 ^{ (c)} + \ zeta_3 ^ {( c) }  &=& 0 \ ,, {\n onum b e r}\\* 
\ze t a_ 1^{(b)}+ w\,\ ze ta _2^{(b) }- \zet a_ 3^{ (b) } &=& 0 \, .\end{ aligned} $$ Eq .  (\[momcons\]) implies ${\ca l  S } ^ {( c )}_\ lam bda+{\cal S }^{( b )}_\ lamb d a= ( \bar\ Lambd av _\ l ambda-\bar\Lambda^* v' _\lamb da)\,  \zeta$, whic h gives th r e e  more re lati o ns $$\begin{align ed}
\ label{cons t br2}
\ze ta_1^ {(c)} +\zeta_1^{ ( b )} &=& \ bar \La mbd a\, \ ze ta \,, \nonum b e r\\* 
 \zeta_ 2^{ (c)} +\ze ta_ 2^{ (b) }&=& -\bar \Lambda^ *\ ,\z et a \ ,, \n o number\\ 
 \z et a_3 ^{(c) }  + \ze ta_3^ {(b) }&= &  0\,.\end { al i g ned} $$  T hese  re la tions  exp r ess  the $\ zeta_j^{( b)} $ ’s i nte rms ofthe $\zeta_j^ {( c)}$’s. Co mb ini ng Eqs . (\[const br1\]) with (\[constbr2 \ ]) yiel ds$$\be gin{ 
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\,_i\overleftarrow D_{\!\lambda}\,_\Gamma\, h^{(b)}_v &=&
 _{\rm Tr}\,_\Big\{_{\cal S}^{(c)}_{\lambda}\,_
_ \bar K_{v'}\,_\Gamma\, H_v \Big\}_\,, \nonumber\\*
\bar h^{(c)}_{v'}\, \Gamma\,_i\overrightarrow D_{\!\lambda}\, h^{(b)}_v_&=&
_ {\rm Tr}\, \Big\{ {\cal S}^{(b)}_{\lambda}\, 
  \bar K_{v'}\, \Gamma\, H_v \Big\} \,.\end{aligned}$$_This_is the_analogue_of_Eq. (\[1/mc1\]), except that in the_present case $$\label{1/mc22}
{\cal S}^{(Q)}_{\lambda} =_\zeta_1^{(Q)} v_\lambda_+ \zeta_2^{(Q)} 
  v'_\lambda + \zeta_3^{(Q)} \gamma_\lambda_\,.$$_The functions $\zeta_i^{(Q)}(w)$_have mass dimension one. The heavy quark equation of_motion yield $$\begin{aligned}
\label{constbr1}
w\, \zeta_1^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(c)}_+ \zeta_3^{(c)} &=&_0_\,,{\nonumber}\\*
\zeta_1^{(b)}_+ w\, \zeta_2^{(b)} -_\zeta_3^{(b)} &=& 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ Eq. (\[momcons\]) implies_${\cal S}^{(c)}_\lambda+{\cal S}^{(b)}_\lambda = 
(\bar\Lambda v_\lambda-\bar\Lambda^*v'_\lambda)\,_\zeta$, which gives three more relations $$\begin{aligned}
\label{constbr2}
\zeta_1^{(c)}_+ \zeta_1^{(b)} &=& \bar\Lambda\, \zeta \,,_\nonumber\\*
  \zeta_2^{(c)} + \zeta_2^{(b)}_&=& -\bar\Lambda^*\,_\zeta \,, \nonumber\\
  \zeta_3^{(c)}_+ \zeta_3^{(b)} &=&_0 \,.\end{aligned}$$_These relations express_the $\zeta_j^{(b)}$’s in terms of the_$\zeta_j^{(c)}$’s. Combining Eqs. (\[constbr1\])_with (\[constbr2\]) yields $$\begin{