 of the positive definite operator $H$ is $\frac{1}{2}\frac{h_E}{2\pi} \omega$, $h_E$ is equal to the product of the lowest eigenvalue of $H(\mathcal{P}_k,\mathcal{Q}_k) $ and $2\theta$. $2\theta $ is in fact the minimal interval during which it makes sense to measure the profit. Let us consider a simple market with a single commodity $\mathfrak{G}$. A consumer (trader) who buys this commodity measures his/her profit in terms of the variable $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{q}$. The producer who provides the consumer with the commodity uses $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{p}$ to this end. Analogously, an auctioneer uses the variable $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace\mathfrak{q}$ (we neglect the additive or multiplicative constant brokerage) and a middleman who reduces the store and sells twice as much as he buys would use the variable $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-2\hspace{.1em}\mathfrak{p}-\mathfrak{q}$. Various subjects active on the market may manifest different levels of activity. Therefore it is useful to define a standard for the “canonical” variables $\mathfrak{p}$ and $\mathfrak{q}$ so that the risk variable [@8] takes the simple form $\tfrac{\mathfrak{p}^2}{2}\negthinspace+\negthinspace\tfrac{\mathfrak{q}^2}{2}$ and the variable $\mathfrak{w}$ measuring the profit of a concrete market subject dealing in the commodity $\mathfrak{G}$ is given by $$u\,\mathfrak{q}+v\,\mathfrak{p}+\mathfrak{w}(u,v)=0\,,
\label{rowprosrad}$$ where the parameters $u$ and $v$ describe the activity. The dealer can modify his/her strategy $|\psi\rangle$ to maximize the profit but this should be done within the specification characterized by $u$ and $v$. For example, let us consider a fundholder who restricts himself to purchasing realties. From his point of view, there is no need nor opportunity of modifying the supply representation of his strategy because this would not increase the financial gain from the purchases. One can easily show by recalling the explicit form of
of the positive definite operator $ H$ is $ \frac{1}{2}\frac{h_E}{2\pi } \omega$, $ h_E$ is equal to the product of the low eigenvalue of $ H(\mathcal{P}_k,\mathcal{Q}_k) $ and $ 2\theta$. $ 2\theta $ is in fact the minimal time interval during which it makes sense to quantify the profit. get us consider a elementary market with a single commodity $ \mathfrak{G}$. A consumer (trader) who buy this commodity measures his / her profit in term of the variable $ \mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{q}$. The producer who provides the consumer with the commodity uses $ \mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{p}$ to this end. Analogously, an auctioneer uses the variable star $ \mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace\mathfrak{q}$ (we neglect the additive or multiplicative constant brokerage house) and a middleman who reduces the store and sells twice equally much as he buy would use the variable $ \mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-2\hspace{.1em}\mathfrak{p}-\mathfrak{q}$. Various national active on the market may manifest different levels of activity. Therefore it is useful to define a standard for the “ canonical ” variables $ \mathfrak{p}$ and $ \mathfrak{q}$ so that the risk variable [ @8 ] takes the simple form $ \tfrac{\mathfrak{p}^2}{2}\negthinspace+\negthinspace\tfrac{\mathfrak{q}^2}{2}$ and the variable $ \mathfrak{w}$ measure the profit of a concrete market national dealing in the commodity $ \mathfrak{G}$ is given by $ $ u\,\mathfrak{q}+v\,\mathfrak{p}+\mathfrak{w}(u, v)=0\, , 
 \label{rowprosrad}$$ where the parameters $ u$ and $ v$ describe the natural process. The dealer can modify his / her strategy $ |\psi\rangle$ to maximize the profit but this should be suffice within the specification characterized by $ u$ and $ v$. For example, let us consider a fundholder who restricts himself to buy realties. From his point of view, there is no need nor opportunity of modifying the supply theatrical performance of his scheme because this would not increase the fiscal gain from the purchases. One can easily show by recalling the explicit form of
 of the positive definite okerator $H$ is $\frac{1}{2}\yeac{h_E}{2\pm} \omega$, $h_E$ is edual to the product of the llwwst eugenvalue of $H(\mathcal{P}_y,\mathcal{Q}_n) $ and $2\tyeta$. $2\rheta $ is mh fact bke mihlmal nnverval during wmich it makas sense to medsjrz the profit. Let us consider a simplq markey aith a single sommpqity $\mathfrak{G}$. A consumer (trader) who bhys thiv commodity mrasures his/her profit in tfrms of the variable $\mwthfrak{w}\negjginfpace=\negthinsoace-\mathfrak{q}$. The prodocer who provides the consumer wkth tke commoditi hsfv $\mathfrak{w}\iegthigspace=\negthikxpace-\mdthfrak{l}$ to this end. Snanogiusly, an auctioneer uves the variable $\mwthfrak{w}\nagchinspace=\negthinspace\narhfran{q}$ (wa neeoecg tge asditivf oc multiplicztive constqnt brokerage) and a myedleman who rsduces tre store and sells twice as much as he tuya would use the variablw $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspafe=\negthinfpace-2\hspace{.1em}\mathfrak{p}-\mathfrak{q}$. Various subjects dctivx un uhc oqrnet may manifest different levels of activity. Fhtrenore it is usefuj to define a sywndard for thg “canonndam” variables $\mathfrwk{p}$ and $\mathdrak{q}$ so uhat yhe risk variable [@8] takes thw simple fori $\tfrac{\mathfrak{p}^2}{2}\negchinspace+\negchinspsce\tftac{\mathfrak{q}^2}{2}$ and the vaxiable $\mathfrak{w}$ leasuring ghe profit of a zonbreta market subject dealing ig the comnodicy $\mathffak{G}$ is giden by $$u\,\mahhfrak{q}+v\,\mathfrak{p}+\mathfran{w}(u,v)=0\,,
\lcbel{rmwprosrad}$$ ahere the parameters $u$ and $v$ describe the actovhty. The deajer csn modify his/rer strategy $|\pxi\ranglz$ to mxximize thv profit uut this shotld be done whjhin the specmfication chaeactwrized ch $u$ and $v$. For rxample, lvt us xonsider a fundholver dgo restricts hinseof to purchasinb rdaleivs. Hrom rhs point of eiew, thdte is no need nov ooporyunity of modifying dhe aupply representatook of his wtrategy because this would not increast the hinancmal gaon srom the purchases. One can easjly show hy vecalling the expoicit form oy
of the positive definite operator $H$ is $h_E$ equal to product of the and $2\theta $ is fact the minimal during which it makes sense to the profit. Let us consider a simple market with a single commodity $\mathfrak{G}$. consumer (trader) who buys this commodity measures his/her profit in terms of the $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{q}$. producer provides consumer with the commodity uses $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{p}$ to this end. Analogously, an auctioneer uses the variable $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace\mathfrak{q}$ neglect the additive or multiplicative constant brokerage) and middleman who reduces the and sells twice as much he would use variable Various active on the may manifest different levels of activity. Therefore it is useful to define a standard for the “canonical” $\mathfrak{p}$ and that the variable takes simple form $\tfrac{\mathfrak{p}^2}{2}\negthinspace+\negthinspace\tfrac{\mathfrak{q}^2}{2}$ variable $\mathfrak{w}$ measuring the profit of subject dealing in the commodity $\mathfrak{G}$ is given $$u\,\mathfrak{q}+v\,\mathfrak{p}+\mathfrak{w}(u,v)=0\,, \label{rowprosrad}$$ the parameters $u$ and $v$ describe activity. The dealer can modify his/her strategy $|\psi\rangle$ maximize the profit but this should be done within the specification characterized by $u$ and example, let us consider fundholder who restricts to realties. his of view, is no need nor opportunity of modifying the supply representation of strategy because this would not increase the financial gain from One easily show by the explicit form of
 of the positive definite operAtor $H$ is $\fraC{1}{2}\frac{H_E}{2\pI} \omEgA$, $h_E$ iS equAl to the product OF the Lowest eigenvalue of $H(\matHcal{P}_K,\mAThcaL{q}_k) $ And $2\thEta$. $2\thetA $ Is IN FacT tHe MinImAL iNtervAl dUring whIch it makes SenSe To measure the PRoFit. Let us coNsiDer a simple maRkeT with a SiNglE CommoDitY $\mathFrak{G}$. A COnsumeR (trader) whO bUYs this COmmoditY MEaSureS his/her profit in teRMs OF the variable $\maThfrak{W}\nEGtHINspAce=\NegthinspaCe-\MathfRAk{q}$. The pROdUCER whO Provides the coNsumer with tHE coMmoditY uSes $\MAthfraK{w}\negThINspAce=\negthinsPace-\Mathfrak{p}$ To this ENd. AnaloGOusly, an AuctioNeeR usEs thE VaRiAblE $\mAThfRAk{W}\neGThiNspace=\neGtHiNspacE\matHFRAK{q}$ (we NegLect The adDitive or multiPliCatiVE coNstanT brokEragE) aNd a miDdlemaN who rEdUces the store and SellS twice as mUch As He bUyS woulD Use the VarIabLe $\mathfRak{w}\negTHinSpACE=\NeGthinspace-2\hspace{.1em}\MaTHFrAk{p}-\mathfRak{q}$. VaRIoUs SUbjects aCtIve On thE MArket May mANiFest diffErent lEVeLs Of activItY. ThereFoRe iT is UsefuL To deFine a sTandard fOr the “CAnonical” variabLEs $\mathfrak{p}$ anD $\MaTHFrAK{q}$ so ThaT the risk varIablE [@8] TakeS the SImPle FOrm $\tfRac{\maThFRaK{P}^2}{2}\negthinspace+\negthiNsPace\tfRac{\maThfrak{q}^2}{2}$ and the Variable $\maTHFRak{w}$ measUrinG ThE Profit of a concrEte maRket subjecT Dealing iN the cOmmodity $\Mathfrak{G}$ IS Given by $$u\,\MatHfrAk{q}+V\,\maTHFrAk{p}+\mathfrak{w}(u,V)=0\,,
\LAbel{RoWprosraD}$$ whEre the pAraMetErs $U$ anD $v$ Describe tHe activiTy. thE dEaLer Can moDIfy his/heR sTraTeGy $|\pSi\ranGLe$ to maXimizE the PrOfIT buT this shOUlD BE donE wItHin tHe sPeCificAtioN ChaRacteriZed by $u$ and $V$. FoR ExamPlE, lEt us conSider a fundholDeR who restriCtS hiMself tO PUrchasinG realties. From his point of VIew, therE is No neeD nor OpportuniTy oF modifYinG The supPly repResenTaTioN OF his sTRAtEgy BeCause this wOULd nOt incReAse tHe finanCial gain from the purCHasEs. One can easilY shOw by RECaLliNG tHE exPlICit FORm of
 of the positive definiteoperator $ H$ is  $\ fra c{ 1}{2 }\fr ac{h_E}{2\pi}\ omeg a$, $h_E$ is equal tothe p ro d ucto fthe l owest e i ge n v alu eof  $H (\ m at hcal{ P}_ k,\math cal{Q}_k)$ a nd  $2\theta$.$ 2\ theta $ is  in  fact the mi nim al int er val durin g w hichit mak e s sens e to meas ur e  the p r ofit. L e t  u s co nsider a simple m a rk e t with a singl e comm od i ty $ \ma thf rak{G}$. A  c onsum e r (trad e r) w h o b u ys this commo dity measur e s h is/her  p rof i t in t ermsof the  variable $ \mat hfrak{w}\ negthi n space=\ n egthins pace-\ mat hfr ak{q } $.  T hepr o duc e rwho pro vides th eco nsume r wi t h t he c omm odit y use s $\mathfrak{ w}\ negt h ins pace= \negt hins pa ce-\m athfra k{p}$  t o this end. Ana logo usly, anauc ti one er  uses the va ria ble  $\math frak{w} \ neg th i n s pa ce=\negthinspace\m at h f ra k{q}$ (w e negl e ct  t h e additi ve  or  mul t i plica tive co nstant b rokera g e)  a nd a mi dd lemanwh o r edu ces t h e st ore an d sellstwice as much as heb uys would use th e va r iabl e $ \mathfrak{w }\ne g thin spac e =\ neg t hinsp ace-2 \h s pa c e{.1em}\mathfrak{p} -\ mathfr ak{q} $. Various su bjects act i v e  on themark e tm ay manifest di ffere nt levelso f activi ty. T herefore  it is us e f ul to de fin e a  st and a r dfor the “cano n i cal”  v ariable s $ \mathfr ak{ p}$  an d $ \m athfrak{q }$ so th at  t he  r isk  vari a ble [@8]  t ake sthe  simp l e form  $\tf rac{ \m at h fra k{p}^2} { 2} \ n egth in sp ace+ \ne gt hinsp ace\ t fra c{\math frak{q}^2 }{2 } $ an dth e varia ble $\mathfra k{ w}$ measur in g t he pro f i t of a c oncrete market subjectd ealinginthe c ommo dity $\ma thf rak{G} $ i s  given  by $$ u\,\m at hfr a k {q}+v \ , \m ath fr ak{p}+\mat h f rak {w}(u ,v )=0\ ,,
\lab el{rowprosrad}$$ w h ere  the paramete rs$u$a n d$v$ de s cri be the a ctivity. The de aler can m od i fy  his/her s t rat eg y $|\ps i\rangl e$ to maximiz e the pro fit but t hi s sh o u ldbe done wi thin the  specific a tionc ha racte riz ed by$u $ a nd $v $. For exa mple,  let u sconsid er afu ndholder  who restricts himselfto pur chasi ngrealties.  Fr o m h is pointof v iew, there  is  no  need  no r  oppo rtun i ty  of modif ying the suppl y  r epr e s en tation of h i s str ategy  be c ause t hiswould not increas e  the financial  gai n fro m t h e pu rc hases. One can  ea si l y  show by  r ecalling th e explic it formof
 of_the positive_definite operator $H$ is_$\frac{1}{2}\frac{h_E}{2\pi} \omega$,_$h_E$_is equal_to_the product of_the lowest eigenvalue_of $H(\mathcal{P}_k,\mathcal{Q}_k) $ and_$2\theta$. $2\theta $_is_in fact the minimal interval during which it makes sense to measure the profit._Let_us consider_a_simple_market with a single commodity_$\mathfrak{G}$. A consumer (trader) who_buys this_commodity measures his/her profit in terms of the_variable_$\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{q}$. The producer_who provides the consumer with the commodity uses $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-\mathfrak{p}$_to this end. Analogously, an auctioneer_uses the variable_$\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace\mathfrak{q}$_(we_neglect the additive or_multiplicative constant brokerage) and a middleman_who reduces the store and sells_twice as much as he buys would_use the variable $\mathfrak{w}\negthinspace=\negthinspace-2\hspace{.1em}\mathfrak{p}-\mathfrak{q}$. Various subjects_active on the market may_manifest different_levels of activity. Therefore it_is useful to_define a_standard for the_“canonical” variables $\mathfrak{p}$ and $\mathfrak{q}$ so_that the risk_variable [@8] takes the simple form_$\tfrac{\mathfrak{p}^2}{2}\negthinspace+\negthinspace\tfrac{\mathfrak{q}^2}{2}$_and the variable_$\mathfrak{w}$_measuring_the profit_of a concrete_market_subject dealing_in_the commodity $\mathfrak{G}$ is given by_$$u\,\mathfrak{q}+v\,\mathfrak{p}+\mathfrak{w}(u,v)=0\,,
\label{rowprosrad}$$_where the parameters $u$ and $v$ describe_the activity. The dealer_can_modify his/her strategy $|\psi\rangle$_to maximize the profit but_this should be done within the_specification characterized_by $u$_and $v$. For example, let us consider a fundholder who restricts_himself to purchasing realties. From his_point of view, there_is no_need_nor opportunity of_modifying_the supply_representation of his strategy because this would_not increase_the financial gain from the purchases._One can easily show_by_recalling the explicit form of