, for all $P=Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{M}$, we write $${\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\big),$$ We recall that $D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}:=\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q \Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$: $$\label{di_form_grad}
\begin{array}{rcl}
 \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)&=&\big[\big[D_Q^{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}},P\big],P\big]=\big\{|D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}|;{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\big\}-2{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}} D_{Q}^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})} {\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}},\\
 \lVert \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_2}&\apprle&{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}}{\ensuremath{\widetilde{E}\left({\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\right)}}\Big[(1+{\ensuremath{\lVertQ\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})(1+{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})\Big]\\
                             &\apprle& K({\ensuremath{\Lambda}},F_1+\alpha^3).
 \end{array}$$ We have used the Cauchy expansion to get an expression $$\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}\big)-{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}={\ensuremath{\displaystyle\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infty}\alpha^k M_k[Y[Q]]$$ where $M_k[Y[Q]]$ is a polynomial function of $\pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}R_{Q}\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ of degree $k$. We refer the reader to these papers or to - above for more details. From formula and Remark \[di\_diff\_ch\] we see that the gradient, as a function of $Q$ is *locally Lipschitz*, at least in some ball $\{Q_0:\,{\ensuremath{\lVert|{\ensuremath{\mathcal{D}^0}}|^{1/
, for all $ P = Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{M}$, we write $ $ { \ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\big),$$ We recall that $ D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}:=\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q \Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$: $ $ \label{di_form_grad } 
 \begin{array}{rcl } 
  \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)&=&\big[\big[D_Q^{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}},P\big],P\big]=\big\{|D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}|;{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\big\}-2{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q } } } D_{Q}^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda } }) } { \ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}},\\ 
  \lVert \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_2}&\apprle&{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}}{\ensuremath{\widetilde{E}\left({\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\right)}}\Big[(1+{\ensuremath{\lVertQ\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})(1+{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})\Big]\\ 
                              & \apprle & K({\ensuremath{\Lambda}},F_1+\alpha^3). 
  \end{array}$$ We have used the Cauchy expansion to draw an formula $ $ \chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}\big)-{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}={\ensuremath{\displaystyle\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infty}\alpha^k M_k[Y[Q]]$$ where $ M_k[Y[Q]]$ is a polynomial function of $ \pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}R_{Q}\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ of degree $ k$. We refer the reviewer to these papers or to - above for more details. From recipe and Remark \[di\_diff\_ch\ ] we see that the gradient, as a function of $ Q$ is * locally Lipschitz *, at least in some musket ball $ \{Q_0:\,{\ensuremath{\lVert|{\ensuremath{\mathcal{D}^0}}|^{1/
, fog all $P=Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcau{P}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{M}$, we write $${\xnsuremzth{\widetklde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(\Pi_{\ensuremati{\Lamvda}}D_Q\Kp_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\big),$$ De recall that $D_Q^{({\wnsucemath{\Lambda}})}:=\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}S_E \Pi_{\znwuremath{\Lambda}}$: $$\label{di_fosm_grad}
\begin{arrdy}{fcp}
 \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)&=&\big[\big[D_Q^{{\enstremath{\Kalbda}}},P\big],P\big]=\bid\{|D_Q^{({\emfurejath{\Lambda}})}|;{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\big\}-2{\ehsuremauh{\widetilde{Q}}} D_{Q}^{({\ensiremath{\Lambda}})} {\ensuremath{\wifetipde{Q}}},\\
 \lVert \nabla \mwthcal{E}^0_{\text{VDF}}(P)\wCert_{\mathfrak{R}_2}&\apprle&{\enslxemath{\lVert{\gnsuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfray{S}_{2}}}}{\ensbremath{\widejnode{F}\neft({\ensuremeth{\Lamfda}}\right)}}\Big[(1+{\ekxuremadh{\lVertA\rVert_{\mathfrak{X}_{2}}}})(1+{\envurwmath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\wmdetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrwk{S}_{2}}}})\Big]\\
                             &\dpprne& K({\dbsufemzti{\Lajbda}},F_1+\apphe^3).
 \end{array}$$ Se have usee the Cauchy expansoog to get an exlressijn $$\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}\big)-{\ensurekatg{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}={\ensuremath{\dispoaystyle\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infty}\alphw^k M_k[Y[Q]]$$ wrere $M_k[Y[Q]]$ is a polynomial function of $\pi_{\ensurematv{\Lambva}}F_{Q}\Pn_{\cksurdnahh{\Lambda}}$ of degree $k$. We refer the reader to trsst pspers or to - anove for more detaold. Gtom formula ana Remaxi \[si\_diff\_ch\] we see thwt the dradiwnt, as a suncyion of $Q$ is *locally Lipschutz*, at least un some ball $\{Q_0:\,{\ensuxemath{\lVert|{\eusuremsth{\mayhcal{D}^0}}|^{1/
, for all $P=Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{M}$, we write $${\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\big),$$ that \Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$: $$\label{di_form_grad} \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)&=&\big[\big[D_Q^{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}},P\big],P\big]=\big\{|D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}|;{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\big\}-2{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}} D_{Q}^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})} K({\ensuremath{\Lambda}},F_1+\alpha^3). We have used Cauchy expansion to an expression $$\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}\big)-{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}={\ensuremath{\displaystyle\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infty}\alpha^k M_k[Y[Q]]$$ where $M_k[Y[Q]]$ a polynomial function of $\pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}R_{Q}\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ of degree $k$. We refer the reader to papers or to - above for more details. From formula and Remark \[di\_diff\_ch\] see the as function of $Q$ is *locally Lipschitz*, at least in some ball $\{Q_0:\,{\ensuremath{\lVert|{\ensuremath{\mathcal{D}^0}}|^{1/
, for all $P=Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcal{p}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{m}$, we wrIte $${\EnsUrEmatH{\widEtilde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infTY,0)}\big(\pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q\Pi_{\EnsurEmATh{\LaMBdA}}\big),$$ WE recall THaT $d_q^{({\enSuReMatH{\LAMbDa}})}:=\Pi_{\eNsuRemath{\LAmbda}}D_Q \Pi_{\eNsuReMath{\Lambda}}$: $$\laBEl{Di_form_grad}
\BegIn{array}{rcl}
 \naBla \MathcaL{E}^0_{\TexT{bDF}}(P)&=&\bIg[\bIg[D_Q^{{\eNsuremATh{\LambDa}}},P\big],P\biG]=\bIG\{|D_Q^{({\ensURemath{\LAMBdA}})}|;{\ensUremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\BIg\}-2{\ENsuremath{\widetIlde{Q}}} D_{q}^{({\eNSuREMatH{\LaMbda}})} {\ensureMaTh{\widETilde{Q}}},\\
 \lvErT \NABla \MAthcal{E}^0_{\text{BDf}}(P)\rVert_{\mathFRak{s}_2}&\apprlE&{\eNsuREmath{\lvert{\eNsURemAth{\widetildE{Q}}}\rVErt_{\mathfrAk{S}_{2}}}}{\ensURemath{\wIDetilde{e}\left({\eNsuRemAth{\LAMbDa}}\RigHt)}}\bIg[(1+{\eNSuRemATh{\lvertQ\rVeRt_{\MaThfraK{S}_{2}}}})(1+{\enSUREMath{\LVeRt{\enSuremAth{\widetilde{Q}}}\RVeRt_{\maTHfrAk{S}_{2}}}})\BiG]\\
                             &\apprLe& K({\eNsUremaTh{\LambDa}},F_1+\alPhA^3).
 \end{array}$$ We have Used The Cauchy ExpAnSioN tO get aN ExpresSioN $$\chI_{(-\infty,0)}\bIg(D_Q^{({\ensURemAtH{\lAMbDa}})}\big)-{\ensuremath{\matHcAL{p}^0_-}}={\eNsurematH{\displAYsTyLE\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infTy}\AlpHa^k M_K[y[q]]$$ wherE $M_k[Y[q]]$ Is A polynomIal funCTiOn Of $\pi_{\ensUrEmath{\LAmBda}}r_{Q}\PI_{\ensuREmatH{\LambdA}}$ of degreE $k$. We rEFer the reader to THese papers or tO - AbOVE fOR morE deTails. From foRmulA And REmarK \[Di\_DifF\_Ch\] we sEe thaT tHE gRAdient, as a function of $q$ iS *localLy LipSchitz*, at least In some ball $\{q_0:\,{\ENSuremath{\LVerT|{\EnSUremath{\mathcal{d}^0}}|^{1/
, for all $P=Q+{\ensuremat h{\mathcal {P}^0 _-} }\i n\ math scr{ M}$, we write$ ${\e nsuremath{\widetilde{Q }}}:= P- \ chi_ { (- \inft y,0)}\b i g( \ P i_{ \e ns ure ma t h{ \Lamb da} }D_Q\Pi _{\ensurem ath {\ Lambda}}\big ) ,$ $ We recal l t hat $D_Q^{({ \en surema th {\L a mbda} })} :=\Pi _{\ens u remath {\Lambda} }D _ Q \Pi_ { \ensure m a th {\La mbda}}$: $$\label { di _ form_grad}
\be gin{ar ra y }{ r c l} \n abla \math ca l{E}^ 0 _{\text { BD F } } (P) & =&\big[\big[D _Q^{{\ensur e mat h{\Lam bd a}} } ,P\big ],P\b ig ] =\b ig\{|D_Q^{( {\en suremath{ \Lambd a }})}|;{ \ ensurem ath{\w ide til de{Q } }} \b ig\ }- 2 {\e n su rem a th{ \widetil de {Q }}} D _{Q} ^ { ( { \ens ure math {\Lam bda}})} {\ens ure math { \wi detil de{Q} }},\ \ \lVe rt \na bla \ ma thcal{E}^0_{\te xt{B DF}}(P)\r Ver t_ {\m at hfrak { S}_2}& \ap prl e&{\ens uremath { \lV er t { \ en suremath{\widetild e{ Q } }} \rVert_{ \mathf r ak {S } _{2}}}}{ \e nsu rema t h {\wid etil d e{ E}\left( {\ensu r em at h{\Lamb da }}\rig ht )}} \Bi g[(1+ { \ens uremat h{\lVert Q\rVe r t_{\mathfrak{S } _{2}}}})(1+{\ e ns u r em a th{\ lVe rt{\ensurem ath{ \ wide tild e {Q }}} \ rVert _{\ma th f ra k {S}_{2}}}})\Big]\\                         &\apprl e & K({\ensu rema t h{ \ Lambda}},F_1+\ alpha ^3).
 \end { array}$$  We h ave used  the Cauc h y  expansi ontoget  an e xp ression $$\ch i _ {(-\ in fty,0)} \bi g(D_Q^{ ({\ ens ure mat h{ \Lambda}} )}\big)- {\ en su re mat h{\ma t hcal{P}^ 0_ -}} ={ \en surem a th{\di splay styl e\ su m }}_ {k=1}^{ + \i n f ty}\ al ph a^kM_k [Y [Q]]$ $ wh e re$M_k[Y[ Q]]$ is a  po l ynom ia lfunctio n of $\pi_{\e ns uremath{\L am bda }}R_{Q } \ Pi_{\ens uremath{\Lambda}}$ of d e gree $k $.We re ferthe reade r t o thes e p a pers o r to -  abov efor m ore d e t ai ls.  F rom formul a and  Rema rk  \[d i\_diff \_ch\] we see that the  gradient, as  afunc t i on  of $Q $  is  * l oca l l y Lipschitz*, a t least in  s o me  ball $\{Q _ 0:\ ,{ \ensure math{\l Vert| { \ensure math{\mat hcal{D}^0 }} |^{1 / 
, for_all $P=Q+{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}\in\mathscr{M}$,_we write $${\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}:=P-\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\big),$$ We_recall that_$D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}:=\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}D_Q_\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$: $$\label{di_form_grad}
\begin{array}{rcl}
_\nabla_\mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)&=&\big[\big[D_Q^{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}},P\big],P\big]=\big\{|D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}|;{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\big\}-2{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}} D_{Q}^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})} {\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}},\\
_\lVert \nabla \mathcal{E}^0_{\text{BDF}}(P)\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_2}&\apprle&{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}}{\ensuremath{\widetilde{E}\left({\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\right)}}\Big[(1+{\ensuremath{\lVertQ\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})(1+{\ensuremath{\lVert{\ensuremath{\widetilde{Q}}}\rVert_{\mathfrak{S}_{2}}}})\Big]\\
_   _  __             __ ___ &\apprle& K({\ensuremath{\Lambda}},F_1+\alpha^3).
 \end{array}$$ We_have used the Cauchy expansion_to get_an expression $$\chi_{(-\infty,0)}\big(D_Q^{({\ensuremath{\Lambda}})}\big)-{\ensuremath{\mathcal{P}^0_-}}={\ensuremath{\displaystyle\sum}}_{k=1}^{+\infty}\alpha^k M_k[Y[Q]]$$ where $M_k[Y[Q]]$ is a_polynomial_function of $\pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}R_{Q}\Pi_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$_of degree $k$. We refer the reader to these_papers or to - above for_more details. From_formula_and_Remark \[di\_diff\_ch\] we see_that the gradient, as a function_of $Q$ is *locally Lipschitz*, at_least in some ball $\{Q_0:\,{\ensuremath{\lVert|{\ensuremath{\mathcal{D}^0}}|^{1/