2a_2}x_3^{2a_3},
x_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3},
x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\
&=&
x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}
(x_1^{a_1-1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1-1}x_2^{b_2},
x_1^{b_1-a_1-1}x_2^{b_2-a_2}x_3^{d-a_3})\\
&=&x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}F_1.\end{aligned}$$ Since $F_1$ has degree at most $d-1$, we have lowered the degree of $F$. Thus by induction $F$ has the required form.

Case (II)(b): $b_1>a_1$ and $\det(A)=-d$. We may assume that $a_2\geq b_2$, otherwise we may proceed as in Case (II)(a). By Lemma \[pillo-boda-28march\] we may also assume that $a_1\geq 1$. We claim that $F$ has the form $F=(x_1^{d-2}x_2x_3,x_1^{d-1}x_2,x_3^d)$. The condition on the determinant is equivalent to the equality $a_2b_1-a_1b_2=1$. Thus $a_2\geq 1$. Hence using that $b_1\geq a_1+1$ one has $$a_2b_1\geq a_2a_1+a_2\geq b_2a_1+1=a_2b_1.$$ Consequently $a_2=b_2=1$. The condition $\det(A)=-d$, becomes $a_1=b_1-1=d-2$. Therefore $F$ has the asserted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3 }, 
 x_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3 }, 
 x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\ 
 & = & 
 x_1^{a_1 + 1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3 } 
 (x_1^{a_1 - 1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1 - 1}x_2^{b_2 }, 
 x_1^{b_1 - a_1 - 1}x_2^{b_2 - a_2}x_3^{d - a_3})\\ 
 & = & x_1^{a_1 + 1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}F_1.\end{aligned}$$ Since $ F_1 $ has degree at most $ d-1 $, we have lowered the academic degree of $ F$. therefore by trigger $ F$ has the command shape. 

 Case (II)(b ): $ b_1 > a_1 $ and $ \det(A)=-d$. We may assume that $ a_2\geq b_2 $, otherwise we may continue as in Case (II)(a). By Lemma   \[pillo - boda-28march\ ] we may also assume that $ a_1\geq 1$. We claim that $ F$ have the form $ F=(x_1^{d-2}x_2x_3,x_1^{d-1}x_2,x_3^d)$. The condition on the deciding is equivalent to the equality $ a_2b_1 - a_1b_2=1$. Thus $ a_2\geq 1$. Hence use that $ b_1\geq a_1 + 1 $ one experience $ $ a_2b_1\geq a_2a_1+a_2\geq b_2a_1 + 1 = a_2b_1.$$ Consequently $ a_2 = b_2=1$. The condition $ \det(A)=-d$, becomes $ a_1 = b_1 - 1 = d-2$. Therefore $ F$ accept the asserted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3},
d_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3},
x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\
&=&
x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}
(x_1^{a_1-1}x_2^{a_2}w_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1-1}x_2^{b_2},
x_1^{b_1-a_1-1}x_2^{b_2-a_2}x_3^{d-a_3})\\
&=&x_1^{c_1+1}z_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}F_1.\eid{alignsd}$$ Since $F_1$ has degree at most $d-1$, we heve oowertb the degree of $F$. Thjs by indlction $F$ yas uhe required form.

Rzse (II)(b): $b_1>a_1$ ans $\det(C)=-d$. We may assume that $a_2\geq b_2$, otherwise wa oav proceed as in Case (II)(a). By Lemma \[piljo-boda-28msrfh\] we may also asslmq thzn $c_1\geq 1$. We claim that $F$ has the fkrm $F=(x_1^{d-2}q_2x_3,x_1^{d-1}x_2,x_3^d)$. The condiyion on the determinant is equlvalent to the equwlity $a_2b_1-a_1b_2=1$. Jgus $q_2\geq 1$. Hence jsing that $b_1\geq a_1+1$ one gas $$a_2b_1\geq a_2a_1+a_2\geq b_2a_1+1=a_2b_1.$$ Consequengly $a_2=y_2=1$. The condijnin $\fgt(A)=-d$, becomes $a_1=b_1-1=d-2$. Nherefore $F$ has the avserted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3}, x_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3}, x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\ &=& x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3} (x_1^{a_1-1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1-1}x_2^{b_2}, x_1^{b_1-a_1-1}x_2^{b_2-a_2}x_3^{d-a_3})\\ $F_1$ degree at $d-1$, we have Thus induction $F$ has required form. Case $b_1>a_1$ and $\det(A)=-d$. We may assume $a_2\geq b_2$, otherwise we may proceed as in Case (II)(a). By Lemma \[pillo-boda-28march\] may also assume that $a_1\geq 1$. We claim that $F$ has the form The on determinant equivalent to the equality $a_2b_1-a_1b_2=1$. Thus $a_2\geq 1$. Hence using that $b_1\geq a_1+1$ one has $$a_2b_1\geq b_2a_1+1=a_2b_1.$$ Consequently $a_2=b_2=1$. The condition $\det(A)=-d$, becomes $a_1=b_1-1=d-2$. $F$ has the asserted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3},
x_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3},
x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\
&=&
x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}
(x_1^{a_1-1}X_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1-1}x_2^{b_2},
x_1^{b_1-A_1-1}x_2^{b_2-a_2}x_3^{D-a_3})\\
&=&x_1^{A_1+1}x_2^{a_2}X_3^{a_3}f_1.\end{AligNed}$$ Since $F_1$ has deGRee aT most $d-1$, we have lowered the DegreE oF $f$. ThuS By InducTion $F$ haS ThE REquIrEd ForM.

CASe (iI)(b): $b_1>a_1$ And $\Det(A)=-d$. We May assume tHat $A_2\gEq b_2$, otherwise WE mAy proceed aS in case (II)(a). By LemMa \[pIllo-boDa-28MarCH\] we maY alSo assUme thaT $A_1\geq 1$. We Claim that $f$ hAS the foRM $F=(x_1^{d-2}x_2x_3,x_1^{D-1}X_2,X_3^d)$. the cOndition on the deteRMiNAnt is equivalenT to the EqUAlITY $a_2b_1-A_1b_2=1$. THus $a_2\geq 1$. HenCe Using THat $b_1\geq A_1+1$ OnE HAS $$a_2b_1\GEq a_2a_1+a_2\geq b_2a_1+1=a_2b_1.$$ COnsequently $A_2=B_2=1$. ThE condiTiOn $\dET(A)=-d$, becOmes $a_1=B_1-1=d-2$. tHerEfore $F$ has thE assErted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3},
x_1^{a_1+ b_1}x_2^{a _2+b_ 2}x _3^ {a _3}, 
x_1 ^{b_1}x_2^{b_2 } x_3^ {d})\\
&=&
x_1^{a_1+1} x_2^{ a_ 2 }x_3 ^ {a _3}
( x_1^{a_ 1 -1 } x _2^ {a _2 }x_ 3^ { a_ 3},x_ 1^{ b_1-1}x _2^{b_2},x_1 ^{ b_1-a_1-1}x_ 2 ^{ b_2-a_2}x_ 3^{ d-a_3})\\
&= &x_ 1^{a_1 +1 }x_ 2 ^{a_2 }x_ 3^{a_ 3}F_1. \ end{al igned}$$Si n ce $F_ 1 $ has d e g re e at  most $d-1$, we h a ve lowered the de gree o f$ F$ . Thu s b y inductio n$F$ h a s the r e qu i r e d f o rm.

Case (II )(b): $b_1> a _1$  and $ \d et( A )=-d$.  We m ay ass ume that $a _2\g eq b_2$,otherw i se we m a y proce ed asinCas e (I I )( a) . B yL emm a  \ [pi l lo- boda-28m ar ch \] we  may a l s o as sum e th at $a _1\geq 1$. We  cl aimt hat  $F$has t he f or m $F= (x_1^{ d-2}x _2 x_3,x_1^{d-1}x_ 2,x_ 3^d)$. Th e c on dit io n ont he det erm ina nt is e quivale n t t ot h e  e quality $a_2b_1-a_ 1b _ 2 =1 $. Thus$a_2\g e q1$ .  Hence u si ngthat $ b_1\g eq a _ 1+ 1$ one h as $$a _ 2b _1 \geq a_ 2a _1+a_2 \g eqb_2 a_1+1 = a_2b _1.$$Conseque ntly$ a_2=b_2=1$. Th e  condition $\ d et ( A )= - d$,bec omes $a_1=b _1-1 = d-2$ . Th e re for e  $F$has t he as s erted
2a_2}x_3^{2a_3},
x_1^{a_1+b_1}x_2^{a_2+b_2}x_3^{a_3},
x_1^{b_1}x_2^{b_2}x_3^{d})\\
&=&
x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}
(x_1^{a_1-1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3},x_1^{b_1-1}x_2^{b_2},
x_1^{b_1-a_1-1}x_2^{b_2-a_2}x_3^{d-a_3})\\
&=&x_1^{a_1+1}x_2^{a_2}x_3^{a_3}F_1.\end{aligned}$$ Since_$F_1$ has_degree at most $d-1$,_we have_lowered_the degree_of_$F$. Thus by_induction $F$ has_the required form.

Case (II)(b):_$b_1>a_1$ and $\det(A)=-d$._We_may assume that $a_2\geq b_2$, otherwise we may proceed as in Case (II)(a). By_Lemma \[pillo-boda-28march\]_we may_also_assume_that $a_1\geq 1$. We claim_that $F$ has the form_$F=(x_1^{d-2}x_2x_3,x_1^{d-1}x_2,x_3^d)$. The_condition on the determinant is equivalent to the_equality_$a_2b_1-a_1b_2=1$. Thus $a_2\geq_1$. Hence using that $b_1\geq a_1+1$ one has $$a_2b_1\geq_a_2a_1+a_2\geq b_2a_1+1=a_2b_1.$$ Consequently $a_2=b_2=1$. The condition_$\det(A)=-d$, becomes $a_1=b_1-1=d-2$._Therefore_$F$_has the asserted