 field. The dependence on the optical depth arises because the more squeezed light is absorbed in the sample, the more the atoms become squeezed. If only a fraction of the light field is absorbed, the atomic spins will not only be correlated with each other but also with the field leaving the sample, and thus the squeezing will be degraded, see also [@Molm99].

Various schemes for quantum state exchange between light and atoms based on cavity QED Raman-type interactions have been proposed in the past [@Cira97; @Park99; @Zeng]. Quantum memory with a microwave cavity field as storage medium has been demonstrated in [@Mait97]. The fact, that the present proposal does not utilize high finesse cavities significantly simplifies the experimental realization. The above result can be compared with the proposal [@Kuzm97] and its experimental verification [@Hald99] for squeezing the collective spin of an optically thick sample of $V$-type excited atoms via the interaction with squeezed light. As opposed to the theoretical bound of 50% mapping efficiency found in [@Kuzm97] the present proposal offers in principle a perfect transfer of the state of light onto atoms.

A steady state analysis in frequency domain similar to that in [@Kuzm97] leads to the following expression for the spectral collective atomic spin operator $$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{{\cal Q}}_{L}(\Delta ) &=&-\frac{i n}{\kappa _{2}E_{s}}\left(
1-e^{ik(\Delta )L}\right) \tilde{E}_{q}(\Delta )  \nonumber \\
&+&\int_{0}^{L}\,dz\frac{n}{\Gamma -i\Delta }e^{ik(\Delta) (L-z)} 
\tilde{F}(z,\Delta )  \label{spectra}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta$ is the detuning from the two-photon resonance and $k(\Delta)$ is the Lorentzian absorption profile $ik(\Delta) =
-a/(\Gamma -i\Delta )$. The atomic noise variance $\langle
X^{2}\rangle =\int d\Delta \tilde{X} (\Delta )\tilde{X}(-\Delta )$ gives the same result as Eq.(\[var\]).

The simplest approach to quantum field propagation in a medium is the model of scattering by a collection of frequency-dependent beam splitters [@Jeff]. Each beam splitter removes a small fraction of a propagating light beam and it
field. The dependence on the optical depth arise because the more squeezed inner light is absorbed in the sample, the more the atoms become squeeze. If only a fraction of the light playing field is absorb, the nuclear spin will not only be correlate with each other but also with the airfield leave the sample, and thus the squeezing will be degraded, see besides [ @Molm99 ]. 

 Various schemes for quantum state rally between light and atoms establish on cavity QED Raman - character interactions have been nominate in the past [ @Cira97; @Park99; @Zeng ]. Quantum memory with a microwave cavity field as storage culture medium has been demonstrated in [ @Mait97 ]. The fact, that the present proposal does not utilize high finesse cavities significantly simplifies the experimental realization. The above result can be compared with the proposal [ @Kuzm97 ] and its experimental verification [ @Hald99 ] for squeezing the collective spin of an optically thick sample of $ V$-type excited atom via the interaction with squeezed light. As oppose to the theoretical tie down of 50% mapping efficiency found in [ @Kuzm97 ] the present marriage proposal offers in rationale a perfect transfer of the state of inner light onto atoms. 

 A steady state analysis in frequency domain similar to that in [ @Kuzm97 ] leads to the following expression for the spectral collective nuclear spin hustler $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \tilde{{\cal Q}}_{L}(\Delta) & = & -\frac{i n}{\kappa _ { 2}E_{s}}\left (
 1 - e^{ik(\Delta) L}\right) \tilde{E}_{q}(\Delta)   \nonumber \\ 
 & + & \int_{0}^{L}\,dz\frac{n}{\Gamma -i\Delta } e^{ik(\Delta) (L - z) } 
 \tilde{F}(z,\Delta)   \label{spectra}\end{aligned}$$ where $ \Delta$ is the detuning from the two - photon resonance and $ k(\Delta)$ is the Lorentzian absorption profile $ ik(\Delta) = 
 -a/(\Gamma -i\Delta) $. The atomic noise variance $ \langle 
 X^{2}\rangle = \int d\Delta \tilde{X } (\Delta) \tilde{X}(-\Delta) $ gives the like result as Eq.(\[var\ ]). 

 The simplest approach to quantum field propagation in a medium is the model of scattering by a collection of frequency - subject beam splitter [ @Jeff ]. Each beam splitter remove a small fraction of a propagate light radio beam and it
 fifld. The dependence on tht optical depth atiwes berause tge more rqueezed light is absorbed ii thw samkje, the more the atums becomv squeezee. If inly a frarfion of the ljnht fneod is absorbed, the atomiw spins will nmt ouly be correlated with each other bue also eihh the field lgavinb the sample, and thus the squeezing wilm be dejraded, see also [@Molm99].

Various schemes for qkantkm state exchange hetween ligyt age atoms basea on cavitj QED Raman-jype interactions have been propused nn the past [@Cura97; @Kark99; @Zeng]. Quentum iemory with a microwdve cavoty field as sboragx meeium has been demonstcated in [@Mait97]. The fast, that tve present proposal dies nmt udilixw hkgh fmnease cagitmes signifidantly simpoifies the experimemtwo realization. The afode result can be compared with the propmsam [@Kuzm97] and its experimebtal verification [@Half99] for squqezing the collective spin of an optically thick vamplx uf $R$-bnpe dzclted atoms via the interaction with squeezed jjgnt. As opposed to the theoreyifak bound of 50% makping eyridiency found in [@Kuxm97] the kresenr proposaj ofgers in principle a perfect transfer of rhe state of light onto atoms.

C steacy stste analysis in frequeney domzin similar to that jv [@Kuzm97] leads to ghe fmllowing expression for thq spectrao coklectivd atpmic s[in operatlr $$\benhn{aligned}
\tilde{{\cal E}}_{L}(\Delja ) &=&-\frdc{i n}{\kappa _{2}E_{s}}\left(
1-e^{ik(\Delta )L}\right) \tilde{E}_{q}(\Dxkta )  \nonumbgr \\
&+&\hnt_{0}^{N}\,dz\frac{n}{\Yamma -l\Delta }e^{ik(\Delta) (L-z)} 
\tilde{F}(z,\Delja )  \labej{specgra}\end{alighed}$$ whece $\Delta$ is ehe detuning xtom the two-phmton resjnanxe abd $k(\Delgx)$ is the Lorenyzian absorption prifile $ik(\Delta) =
-a/(\Gamka -k\Selta )$. The atomne boise variance $\kanele
V^{2}\rwnjle =\igd d\Delta \tilge{X} (\Aelgs )\tilae{X}(-\Delta )$ glver thr same result as Eq.(\[vdr\]).

Ths simplest approacn bo quantun field [ropagation im a medium is the lodel of scatyeryng by a collection of frequendy-dependejt neam splitterf [@Jenf]. Ewch beam s'litter removes a small fraction of a pripagating light bgam and it
field. The dependence on the optical depth the squeezed light absorbed in the become If only a of the light is absorbed, the atomic spins will only be correlated with each other but also with the field leaving the and thus the squeezing will be degraded, see also [@Molm99]. Various schemes for state between and based on cavity QED Raman-type interactions have been proposed in the past [@Cira97; @Park99; @Zeng]. Quantum with a microwave cavity field as storage medium been demonstrated in [@Mait97]. fact, that the present proposal not high finesse significantly the realization. The above can be compared with the proposal [@Kuzm97] and its experimental verification [@Hald99] for squeezing the collective spin an optically of $V$-type atoms the with squeezed light. to the theoretical bound of 50% in [@Kuzm97] the present proposal offers in principle perfect transfer the state of light onto atoms. steady state analysis in frequency domain similar to in [@Kuzm97] leads to the following expression for the spectral collective atomic spin operator $$\begin{aligned} ) &=&-\frac{i n}{\kappa _{2}E_{s}}\left( )L}\right) \tilde{E}_{q}(\Delta ) \\ -i\Delta (L-z)} ) \label{spectra}\end{aligned}$$ $\Delta$ is the detuning from the two-photon resonance and $k(\Delta)$ is Lorentzian absorption profile $ik(\Delta) = -a/(\Gamma -i\Delta )$. The atomic $\langle =\int d\Delta \tilde{X} )\tilde{X}(-\Delta )$ gives the result Eq.(\[var\]). The simplest approach field in the of by a collection of beam splitters [@Jeff]. Each beam removes a small fraction and it
 field. The dependence on the opTical depth AriseS beCauSe The mOre sQueezed light is ABsorBed in the sample, the more tHe atoMs BEcomE SqUeezeD. If only A FrACTioN oF tHe lIgHT fIeld iS abSorbed, tHe atomic spIns WiLl not only be cORrElated with EacH other but alsO wiTh the fIeLd lEAving The SamplE, and thUS the sqUeezing wiLl BE degraDEd, see alSO [@moLm99].

VaRious schemes for quANtUM state exchange BetweeN lIGhT ANd aTomS based on caViTy QED rAman-typE InTERActIOns have been prOposed in the PAst [@cira97; @PaRk99; @zenG]. quantuM memoRy WIth A microwave cAvitY field as sTorage MEdium haS Been demOnstraTed In [@MAit97]. THE fAcT, thAt THe pREsEnt PRopOsal does NoT uTilizE higH FINEsse CavItieS signIficantly simpLifIes tHE exPerimEntal RealIzAtion. the aboVe resUlT can be compared wIth tHe proposaL [@KuZm97] And ItS expeRImentaL veRifIcation [@hald99] for SQueEzING ThE collective spin of aN oPTIcAlly thicK samplE Of $v$-tYPe exciteD aTomS via THE inteRactIOn With squeEzed liGHt. as Opposed To The theOrEtiCal Bound OF 50% mapPing efFiciency Found IN [@Kuzm97] the presenT Proposal offerS In PRInCIple A peRfect transfEr of THe stAte oF LiGht ONto atOms.

A sTeADy STate analysis in frequEnCy domaIn simIlar to that in [@KUzm97] leads to THE FollowinG expREsSIon for the spectRal coLlective atOMic spin oPeratOr $$\begin{aLigned}
\tilDE{{\Cal Q}}_{L}(\DelTa ) &=&-\fRac{I n}{\kAppA _{2}e_{S}}\lEft(
1-e^{ik(\Delta )L}\rIGHt) \tiLdE{E}_{q}(\DeltA )  \noNumber \\
&+&\iNt_{0}^{L}\,Dz\fRac{N}{\GaMmA -i\Delta }e^{iK(\Delta) (L-z)} 
\TiLdE{F}(Z,\DEltA )  \labeL{Spectra}\eNd{AliGnEd}$$ wHere $\DELta$ is tHe detUninG fRoM The Two-photON rESOnanCe AnD $k(\DeLta)$ Is The LoRentZIan AbsorptIon profilE $ik(\dElta) =
-A/(\GAmMa -i\DeltA )$. The atomic noiSe Variance $\laNgLe
X^{2}\Rangle =\INT d\Delta \tIlde{X} (\Delta )\tilde{X}(-\Delta )$ giVEs the saMe rEsult As Eq.(\[Var\]).

The simPleSt apprOacH To quanTum fieLd proPaGatION in a mEDIuM is ThE model of scATTerIng by A cOlleCtion of Frequency-dependent BEam Splitters [@Jeff]. eacH beaM SPlIttER rEMovEs A SmaLL Fraction of a propAgating ligHt BEaM and it
 field. The dependence onthe optica l dep thari se s be caus e the more squ e ezed  light is absorbed inthe s am p le,t he  more  the at o ms b eco me  s que ez e d.  If o nly  a frac tion of th e l ig ht field isa bs orbed, the  at omic spins w ill  not o nl y b e  corr ela ted w ith ea c h othe r but als ow ith th e  fieldl e av ingthe sample, and t h us the squeezingwill b ed eg r a ded , s ee also [@ Mo lm99] . 

Vario u ss c h eme s  for quantumstate excha n gebetwee nlig h t andatoms  b a sed  on cavityQEDRaman-typ e inte r actions have be en pro pos edin t h epa st[@ C ira 9 7;  @P a rk9 9; @Zeng ].  Q uantu m me m o r y  wit h a  mic rowav e cavity fiel d a s st o rag e med ium h as b ee n dem onstra ted i n[@Mait97]. Thefact , that th e p re sen tpropo s al doe s n otutilize  high f i nes se c a vi ties significantly  s i m pl ifies th e expe r im en t al reali za tio n. T h e  abov e re s ul t can be  compa r ed  w ith the  p roposa l[@K uzm 97] a n d it s expe rimental  veri f ication [@Hald 9 9] for squeez i ng t he coll ect ive spin of  ano ptic ally th ick sampl e of$V $ -t y pe excited atoms vi athe in terac tion with squ eezed ligh t . As oppos ed t o  t h e theoreticalbound  of 50% ma p ping eff icien cy found  in [@Kuz m 9 7] the p res ent  pr opo s a loffers in pri n c iple  a  perfec t t ransfer  of  th e s tat eof lightonto ato ms .
A  s tea dy st a te analy si s i nfre quenc y  domai n sim ilar  t ot hat  in [@K u zm 9 7 ] le ad sto t hefo llowi ng e x pre ssion f or the sp ect r al c ol le ctive a tomic spin op er ator $$\be gi n{a ligned } \tilde{{ \cal Q}}_{L}(\Delta ) & = &-\frac {in}{\k appa  _{2}E_{s }}\ left(1-e ^ {ik(\D elta ) L}\ri gh t)\ t ilde{ E } _{ q}( \D elta )  \n o n umb er \\ 
& +&\i nt_{0}^ {L}\,dz\frac{n}{\G a mma  -i\Delta }e^ {ik (\De l t a)  (L - z) }  
\ ti l de{ F } (z,\Delta )  \l abel{spect ra } \e nd{aligned } $$wh ere $\D elta$ i s the detunin g from th e two-pho to n re s o nan ce and $k( \Delta)$  is the L o rentz i an  abso rpt ion pr of ile  $ik( \Delta )  =-a/(\ Gamma-i \Delta  )$.Th e atomic  noise variance $\langl e
X^{2 }\ran gle  =\int d\ Del t a \ tilde{X}(\De lta )\tild e{X }(- \Delt a ) $  give s th e  s ame resul t as Eq.(\[var \ ]) .
T h esimplest ap p r o ach  to q uan t um fie ld p ropagation in a m e dium is the mo delo f  sc att e ring  b y a collection  of  f r e quency-d ep endent beam  splitte rs [@Jef f]. Ea ch bea m split t e rr emoves  a s mal l fractio n o fa  propag at in g  light  bea mand it 
 field._The dependence_on the optical depth_arises because_the_more squeezed_light_is absorbed in_the sample, the_more the atoms become_squeezed. If only_a_fraction of the light field is absorbed, the atomic spins will not only be_correlated_with each_other_but_also with the field leaving_the sample, and thus the_squeezing will_be degraded, see also [@Molm99].

Various schemes for quantum_state_exchange between light_and atoms based on cavity QED Raman-type interactions have_been proposed in the past [@Cira97;_@Park99; @Zeng]. Quantum_memory_with_a microwave cavity field_as storage medium has been demonstrated_in [@Mait97]. The fact, that the_present proposal does not utilize high finesse_cavities significantly simplifies the experimental realization._The above result can be_compared with_the proposal [@Kuzm97] and its_experimental verification [@Hald99]_for squeezing_the collective spin_of an optically thick sample of_$V$-type excited atoms_via the interaction with squeezed light._As_opposed to the_theoretical_bound_of 50%_mapping efficiency found_in_[@Kuzm97] the_present_proposal offers in principle a perfect_transfer_of the state of light onto atoms.

A_steady state analysis in_frequency_domain similar to that_in [@Kuzm97] leads to the_following expression for the spectral collective_atomic spin_operator $$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{{\cal_Q}}_{L}(\Delta ) &=&-\frac{i n}{\kappa _{2}E_{s}}\left(
1-e^{ik(\Delta )L}\right) \tilde{E}_{q}(\Delta )  \nonumber \\
&+&\int_{0}^{L}\,dz\frac{n}{\Gamma_-i\Delta }e^{ik(\Delta) (L-z)} 
\tilde{F}(z,\Delta ) _\label{spectra}\end{aligned}$$ where $\Delta$ is_the detuning_from_the two-photon resonance_and_$k(\Delta)$ is_the Lorentzian absorption profile $ik(\Delta) =
-a/(\Gamma -i\Delta_)$. The_atomic noise variance $\langle
X^{2}\rangle =\int d\Delta_\tilde{X} (\Delta )\tilde{X}(-\Delta )$_gives_the same result as Eq.(\[var\]).

The simplest_approach to quantum field propagation in_a medium is the model_of_scattering_by a collection of frequency-dependent_beam splitters [@Jeff]. Each beam splitter_removes a small_fraction of a propagating light beam and_it