M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 + m\_b/m\_b) \[eq:thresholds\]. $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below}$ can be determined by taking the value of $m_b(m_b) = 4.19$ GeV and running it to the $M_Z$ scale. This is evaluated using the package to be $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below} = 2.69$ GeV. The hope then is that the right choice of bottom Yukawa coupling and the appropriate set of SUSY boundary conditions at some UV scale will give rise to the necessary $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm above}$ and $\Delta m_b/m_b$ to satisfy \[eq:thresholds\].

When fitting the bottom quark mass, it is common to use the full, exact one-loop correction. This is done in most numerical spectrum calculators, such as  [@Allanach:2014nba] and  [@Porod:2003um]. Physical interpretations are often based however on the approximate formula given in \[Eq:common-app\]. As was shown in the previous section, additional terms, namely the $B_1^{\widetilde{g}}$ terms from the gluino-sbottom contributions and the contributions from the Higgses, should also be included for a full description. These “missing" terms contribute $\sim$12% to the correction. In \[Sec:intro\] the conditions for obtaining an appropriate SUSY threshold correction to the bottom quark mass in models with third family Yukawa unification were determined by an interpretation of the approximate formula given in \[Eq:common-app\]. We revisit this scenario here to offer a more accurate interpretation.

In models with third family Yukawa unification, the SUSY threshold corrections to the bottom quark typically need to be $-\mathcal{O}$(few)%. For $\mu>0$, the common interpretation is $A_t$ needs to be large and negative in order for the chargino-stop contribution to overcome the $B_0^{\widetilde{g}}$ term from the gluino-sbottom contribution. By including the “missing" terms, which are positive, we see that the size of $A_t$ is underestimated when the approximate form of the corrections is used to interpret the size of the parameters. This is particularly true when the squarks are heavy. In this regime, the chargino
M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 + m\_b / m\_b) \[eq: thresholds\ ]. $ m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below}$ can be determined by taking the value of $ m_b(m_b) = 4.19 $ GeV and running it to the $ M_Z$ scale. This is measure use the package to be $ m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below } = 2.69 $ GeV. The hope then is that the correct choice of bottom Yukawa coupling and the appropriate stage set of SUSY boundary conditions at some UV plate will contribute rise to the necessary $ m_b(M_Z)^{\rm above}$ and $ \Delta m_b / m_b$ to meet   \[eq: thresholds\ ]. 

 When fitting the bottom quark mass, it is common to use the full, accurate one - loop correction. This is do in most numerical spectrum calculators, such as   [ @Allanach:2014nba ] and   [ @Porod:2003um ]. Physical interpretation are often based however on the approximate formula give in   \[Eq: common - app\ ]. As was shown in the previous section, extra terms, namely the $ B_1^{\widetilde{g}}$ term from the gluino - sbottom contributions and the contributions from the Higgses, should also be include for a full description. These “ missing " terms contribute $ \sim$12% to the correction. In   \[Sec: intro\ ] the conditions for obtaining an appropriate SUSY threshold correction to the bottom quark mass in models with third family Yukawa unification were determined by an interpretation of the approximate formula given in   \[Eq: coarse - app\ ]. We revisit this scenario here to offer a more accurate interpretation. 

 In mannequin with third syndicate Yukawa unification, the SUSY threshold corrections to the bottom quark cheese typically need to be $ -\mathcal{O}$(few)%. For $ \mu>0 $, the coarse interpretation is $ A_t$ needs to be big and negative in order for the chargino - stop contribution to overcome the $ B_0^{\widetilde{g}}$ term from the gluino - sbottom contribution. By including the “ lacking " terms, which are positive, we see that the size of $ A_t$ is underestimated when the approximate form of the corrections is used to rede the size of the parameters. This is particularly true when the squarks are heavy. In this government, the chargino
M\_Z)\^[MDSM]{}(1 + m\_b/m\_b) \[eq:thresholds\]. $m_n(M_Z)^{\rm below}$ can yw detecmined gy takine the value of $m_b(m_b) = 4.19$ GeV anv rubning it to the $M_Z$ scale. Thks is evapuated uwing rhe packagx to be $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm nelow} = 2.69$ GeV. The hope then is tvat the right whuiee of bottom Yukawa coupling and the approptiwte set of SUSI boumqary bokditions at some UV scale will gjve rist to the necessary $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm above}$ and $\Delta m_b/l_b$ tl satisfy \[eq:threshopds\].

When fitjjng rhe bottom qjark mass, pc is common to use the full, exact one-loop zorreetion. This us dojg in most nunericwl spectrum gslculadors, suvh as  [@Allanach:2014kba] aid  [@Pirod:2003um]. Physical inter'retations are often based hoferer on the approximatw dormuna ghven un \[Ed:cojmpn-zpp\]. As waa shown in the previoys section, additionsl nrrms, namely fhe $B_1^{\wydqtilde{g}}$ terms from the gluino-sbottom cottrjbutions and the contrivutions from the Higgdes, shoulq also be included for a full description. These “mhssinj" gerns zinhribute $\sim$12% to the correction. In \[Sec:intro\] the skncinions for obtainikg an appropriate XUDY jhreshold corrgction ck fhe bottom quark mwss in iodelw with thyrd gamily Yukawa unification wwre determinvd bt an interpretatiou of the appxoximaje forkula given in \[Eq:common-ap'\]. We rsvisit this scenario fere to offer a oorv acwurate interpretation.

In moqels with thixd familh Yulawa ugification, the SUSY threshold corrfctious to the bottol quark typically need to be $-\mavical{O}$(few)%. For $\ku>0$, thv common nnterpvetation is $A_t$ geeds to be latge and nzgativd in order for thx chargino-stjp contributimj to overcomx the $B_0^{\wiqetiode{g}}$ term ffum the gluino-snottom couuribution. Vy including the “mlssine" terms, which arz kowitive, we see yhag tre smze os $A_t$ is underastioatdc whev the ak'rowimxte gorm of the correctimns js used to interprrt the sizg of the [arameters. Thos is particularly true whxn the sqoarks are heavy. In this regime, fhe charglno
M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 + m\_b/m\_b) \[eq:thresholds\]. $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below}$ can by the value $m_b(m_b) = 4.19$ the scale. This is using the package be $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below} = 2.69$ GeV. hope then is that the right choice of bottom Yukawa coupling and the set of SUSY boundary conditions at some UV scale will give rise to necessary above}$ $\Delta to satisfy \[eq:thresholds\]. When fitting the bottom quark mass, it is common to use the full, one-loop correction. This is done in most numerical calculators, such as [@Allanach:2014nba] [@Porod:2003um]. Physical interpretations are often however the approximate given \[Eq:common-app\]. was shown in previous section, additional terms, namely the $B_1^{\widetilde{g}}$ terms from the gluino-sbottom contributions and the contributions from the should also for a description. “missing" contribute $\sim$12% to In \[Sec:intro\] the conditions for obtaining threshold correction to the bottom quark mass in with third Yukawa unification were determined by an of the approximate formula given in \[Eq:common-app\]. We this scenario here to offer a more accurate interpretation. In models with third family Yukawa SUSY threshold corrections to bottom quark typically to $-\mathcal{O}$(few)%. $\mu>0$, common interpretation $A_t$ needs to be large and negative in order for the contribution to overcome the $B_0^{\widetilde{g}}$ term from the gluino-sbottom contribution. the terms, which are we see that the of is underestimated when the of corrections interpret size the parameters. This is true when the squarks are In this regime, the
M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 + m\_b/m\_b) \[eq:thresholds\]. $m_b(M_z)^{\rm below}$ caN be deTerMinEd By taKing The value of $m_b(m_b) = 4.19$ gEV anD running it to the $M_Z$ scale. this iS eVAluaTEd Using The packAGe TO Be $m_B(M_z)^{\rM beLoW} = 2.69$ gev. The hOpe Then is tHat the righT chOiCe of bottom YuKAwA coupling aNd tHe appropriatE seT of SUSy bOunDAry coNdiTions At some uv scale Will give rIsE To the nECessary $M_B(m_Z)^{\Rm abOve}$ and $\Delta m_b/m_b$ to SAtISfy \[eq:thresholdS\].

When fItTInG THe bOttOm quark masS, iT is coMMon to usE ThE FULl, eXAct one-loop corRection. This IS doNe in moSt NumERical sPectrUm CAlcUlators, such As  [@AlLanach:2014nba] And  [@PorOD:2003um]. PhysICal inteRpretaTioNs aRe ofTEn BaSed HoWEveR On The APprOximate fOrMuLa givEn in \[eQ:COMmon-App\]. as waS showN in the previouS seCtioN, AddItionAl terMs, naMeLy the $b_1^{\widetIlde{g}}$ TeRms from the gluinO-sboTtom contrIbuTiOns AnD the cONtribuTioNs fRom the HIggses, sHOulD aLSO Be Included for a full deScRIPtIon. These “MissinG" TeRmS ContribuTe $\Sim$12% To thE COrrecTion. iN \[SEc:intro\] tHe condITiOnS for obtAiNing an ApProPriAte SUsy thrEshold CorrectiOn to tHE bottom quark maSS in models with THiRD FaMIly YUkaWa unificatiOn weRE detErmiNEd By aN InterPretaTiON oF The approximate formuLa Given iN \[Eq:coMmon-app\]. We reviSit this sceNARIo here to OffeR A mORe accurate inteRpretAtion.

In modELs with thIrd faMily YukaWa unificaTIOn, the SUSy thResHolD coRREcTions to the botTOM quaRk TypicalLy nEed to be $-\MatHcaL{O}$(fEw)%. FOr $\Mu>0$, the commOn interpReTaTiOn Is $A_T$ needS To be largE aNd nEgAtiVe in oRDer for The chArgiNo-StOP coNtributIOn TO OverCoMe The $B_0^{\WidEtIlde{g}}$ Term FRom The gluiNo-sbottom ConTRibuTiOn. by incluDing the “missinG" tErms, which aRe PosItive, wE SEe that thE size of $A_t$ is underestimatED when thE apProxiMate Form of the CorRectioNs iS Used to InterpRet thE sIze OF The paRAMeTerS. THis is partiCULarLy truE wHen tHe squarKs are heavy. In this reGIme, The chargino
M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 + m\_b/m \_b) \[eq: thres hol ds\ ].  $m_ b(M_ Z)^{\rm below} $  can  be determined by taki ng th ev alue of  $m_b (m_b) = 4. 1 9 $ G eV  a ndru n ni ng it  to  the $M _Z$ scale.  Th is  is evaluate d  u sing the p ack age to be $m _b( M_Z)^{ \r m b e low}= 2 .69$GeV. T h e hope  then isth a t ther ight ch o i ce  ofbottom Yukawa cou p li n g and the appr opriat es et o f S USY  boundaryco nditi o ns at s o me U V  sc a le will giverise to the nec essary  $ m_b ( M_Z)^{ \rm a bo v e}$  and $\Delt a m_ b/m_b$ to  satis f y \[eq: t hreshol ds\].
Wh enfitt i ng  t hebo t tom qu ark mas s, it is  c om mon t o us e t h e fu ll,  exa ct on e-loop correc tio n. T h isis do ne in  mos tnumer ical s pectr um  calculators, s uchas  [@All ana ch :20 14 nba]a nd  [@ Por od: 2003um] . Physi c alin t e r pr etations are often  b a s ed  however  on th e  a pp r oximatefo rmu la g i v en in  \[E q :c ommon-ap p\]. A s  w as  shownin  the p re vio ussecti o n, a dditio nal term s, na m ely the $B_1^{ \ widetilde{g}} $  t e r ms from  th e gluino-sb otto m  con trib u ti ons and t he co nt r ib u tions from the Higg se s, sho uld a lso be includ ed for a f u l l  descrip tion .  T h ese “missing"terms  contribut e  $\sim$1 2% to  the cor rection.I n  \[Sec:i ntr o\]  th e c o n di tions for obt a i ning  a n appro pri ate SUS Y t hre sho ldco rrectionto the b ot to mqu ark  mass in model swit hthi rd fa m ily Yu kawaunif ic at i onwere de t er m i nedby  a n in ter pr etati on o f  th e appro ximate fo rmu l a gi ve nin \[Eq :common-app\] .We revisit  t his  scena r i o here t o offer a more accurate interpr eta tion. 

In  models w ith  third  fa m ily Yu kawa u nific at ion , the S U S Ythr es hold corre c t ion s toth e bo ttom qu ark typically need tobe $-\mathcal {O} $(fe w ) %.  Fo r  $ \ mu> 0$ ,  th e common interpre tation is$A _ t$  needs tob e l ar ge andnegativ e ino rder fo r the cha rgino-sto pcont r i but ion to ove rcome th e $B_0^{\ w ideti l de {g}}$  te rm fro mthe  glui no-sbo t tom  cont ributi on . By i nclud in g the “m issing" terms, which ar e posi tive,  we  see that  th e  si ze of $A_ t$ i s underest ima ted  when  th e  appr oxim a te  fo r m ofthec orrection s  i s u s e dto interpre t t hesizeoft he par amet ers. This is part i cularly true w hent h e s qua r ks a re  heavy. In thi s r eg i m e, the c ha rgino
M\_Z)\^[MSSM]{}(1 +_m\_b/m\_b) \[eq:thresholds\]._$m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below}$ can be_determined by_taking_the value_of_$m_b(m_b) = 4.19$_GeV and running_it to the $M_Z$_scale. This is_evaluated_using the package to be $m_b(M_Z)^{\rm below} = 2.69$ GeV. The hope then is_that_the right_choice_of_bottom Yukawa coupling and the_appropriate set of SUSY boundary_conditions at_some UV scale will give rise to the_necessary_$m_b(M_Z)^{\rm above}$ and_$\Delta m_b/m_b$ to satisfy \[eq:thresholds\].

When fitting the bottom quark mass,_it is common to use the_full, exact one-loop_correction._This_is done in most_numerical spectrum calculators, such as  [@Allanach:2014nba]_and  [@Porod:2003um]. Physical interpretations are often_based however on the approximate formula given_in \[Eq:common-app\]. As was shown in the_previous section, additional terms, namely_the $B_1^{\widetilde{g}}$_terms from the gluino-sbottom contributions_and the contributions_from the_Higgses, should also_be included for a full description._These “missing" terms_contribute $\sim$12% to the correction. In \[Sec:intro\]_the_conditions for obtaining_an_appropriate_SUSY threshold_correction to the_bottom_quark mass_in_models with third family Yukawa unification_were_determined by an interpretation of the approximate_formula given in \[Eq:common-app\]. We_revisit_this scenario here to_offer a more accurate interpretation.

In_models with third family Yukawa unification,_the SUSY_threshold corrections_to the bottom quark typically need to be $-\mathcal{O}$(few)%. For $\mu>0$,_the common interpretation is $A_t$ needs_to be large and_negative in_order_for the chargino-stop_contribution_to overcome_the $B_0^{\widetilde{g}}$ term from the gluino-sbottom contribution._By including_the “missing" terms, which are positive,_we see that the_size_of $A_t$ is underestimated when the_approximate form of the corrections is_used to interpret the size_of_the_parameters. This is particularly true_when the squarks are heavy. In_this regime, the_chargino