)$ and $\rho(0)$ is in general not valid. To describe the evolution of an open system, one usually employs the Kraus representation[@Kraus]. If there exist operators $M_\mu(t)$, called Kraus operators, that satisfy $$\begin{aligned}
\rho(t)=\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)\rho(0)M_\mu(t)^\dagger,
\label{rhot}\end{aligned}$$and $$\begin{aligned}
\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)^\dagger M_\mu(t)=I, \label{mm}\end{aligned}$$ then the evolution of $\rho(t)$ is said to have operator-sum representation or the Kraus representation.

It has been known that a completely positive map always possesses the operator-sum representation while a general positive map may not do[@Kraus; @Preskill; @Pechukas; @Pomero; @Bouda; @Philip; @Gen; @Peixoto; @Mika; @Sonja]. The papers[@Peter; @Salgado; @Hayashi] furthermore pursued the existence of the Kraus representation by investigating the role of initial correlations between the open system and its environment, and showed that a map based on the reduced dynamics, in general, cannot be described as the Kraus representation in the presence of the initial correlations because an additional inhomogeneous part appears. On the other hand, we know that for a qubit system, although a non-completely positive map $\$:\rho(0)\rightarrow\rho(t)$ does not possess the Kraus representation with the Kraus operators independent of $\rho(0)$, the state $\rho(t)=\$(\rho(0))$ can still be expressed in the form of Eq. (\[rhot\]) with the operators $M_\mu(t)$ selected for $\rho(0)$[@Philip; @Gen; @Tong1]. Arbitrary density matrices $\rho(t)$ of a qubit system can always be described in terms of the operator-sum representation. This start us to wonder whether the same property is valid for $N$-dimensional systems. That is, for any arbitrary time-dependent state $\rho(t)$ and initial state $\rho(0)$ of an $N$-dimensional system, is it true that the operators $M_\mu(t) $ can always be found so that (\[rhot\]) and (\[mm\]) are
) $ and $ \rho(0)$ is in general not valid. To describe the evolution of an open arrangement, one normally employs the Kraus representation[@Kraus ]. If there exist operators $ M_\mu(t)$, call Kraus operator, that satisfy $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \rho(t)=\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)\rho(0)M_\mu(t)^\dagger, 
 \label{rhot}\end{aligned}$$and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)^\dagger M_\mu(t)=I, \label{mm}\end{aligned}$$ then the evolution of $ \rho(t)$ is order to have operator - kernel representation or the Kraus representation. 

 It has been know that a completely positive map always possesses the operator - kernel representation while a general positive function may not do[@Kraus; @Preskill; @Pechukas; @Pomero; @Bouda; @Philip; @Gen; @Peixoto; @Mika; @Sonja ]. The papers[@Peter; @Salgado; @Hayashi ] furthermore pursued the existence of the Kraus theatrical performance by investigating the character of initial correlations between the receptive system and its environment, and showed that a map free-base on the reduced dynamics, in general, cannot be described as the Kraus representation in the presence of the initial correlations because an additional inhomogeneous part appears. On the other hand, we know that for a qubit system, although a non - completely positive map $ \$:\rho(0)\rightarrow\rho(t)$ does not own the Kraus theatrical performance with the Kraus operators independent of $ \rho(0)$, the state $ \rho(t)=\$(\rho(0))$ can however be expressed in the form of Eq. (\[rhot\ ]) with the operators $ M_\mu(t)$ choose for $ \rho(0)$[@Philip; @Gen; @Tong1 ]. Arbitrary density matrix $ \rho(t)$ of a qubit system can always be trace in terms of the operator - sum representation. This start us to wonder whether the same property is valid for $ N$-dimensional systems. That is, for any arbitrary time - dependent state $ \rho(t)$ and initial department of state $ \rho(0)$ of an $ N$-dimensional system, is it truthful that the operators $ M_\mu(t) $ can always be found so that (\[rhot\ ]) and (\[mm\ ]) are
)$ anf $\rho(0)$ is in general not yalid. To describg rhe evmlutioh of an upen system, one usually empllyw the Kraus representation[@Kfaus]. If tjere exiwt okerators $M_\mu(t)$, called Kraus operzbors, chet satisfy $$\begik{aligned}
\rho(d)=\sum\limits_\mu M_\ku(g)\rko(0)M_\mu(t)^\dagger,
\label{rhot}\end{aligned}$$and $$\bqgin{alibnfd}
\sum\limits_\mu I_\mu(t)^\cwgged M_\mu(t)=I, \label{mm}\end{aligned}$$ then the evolutpon of $\rho(t)$ is saod to have operator-sum repgesejtation or the Kraks represenjztijb.

It has been known thau c completeli positive map always possesses ghe o'erator-sum tzpredgntation whioe a deneral posibpve map may noy do[@Kraus; @Presliln; @Pwchukas; @Pomero; @Bouda; @'hilip; @Gen; @Peixoto; @Myka; @Sonja]. Tke papers[@Peter; @Salgadi; @Yayasvi] fgrthdemofe kurxusd the exmstence of fhe Kraus rwpresentation by infefnogating the dole os ynitial correlations between the open sjstej and its environment, abd showed that a map hased on ehe reduced dynamics, in general, cannot be describad as ghe Kvaus eeoresentation in the presence of the initial cjdrtlanions because an cdditional inhompgfnrjus part appexrs. On ths other hand, we knlw that for q qubit srstek, although a non-completely positive map $\$:\eho(0)\rightarrow\rho(t)$ boes not posress the Lraus representation wich the Kraus operwtors indsoendent of $\rho(0)$, tfe xtdte $\rho(t)=\$(\rho(0))$ can still be evpressed mn thz form ow Eq. (\[rhot\]) rith the ooerators $M_\mu(t)$ selected flr $\rhl(0)$[@Pvilip; @Gen; @Hong1]. Arbitrary density matrices $\rho(t)$ of a qubot syvtem can alwans be described in terms of tke operacor-sum representztion. Tiis start us to wonder whajher the same propertr is valud for $V$-aimensional syxtems. Than ns, for ant arbitrary time-deiendevf state $\rho(t)$ anb unitial state $\rno(0)$ uf wn $N$-vimenfhonal system, is kt gtue tfat the opevaturs $K_\mu(t) $ can always be xouns so that (\[rhot\]) and (\[mi\]) are
)$ and $\rho(0)$ is in general not describe evolution of open system, one If exist operators $M_\mu(t)$, Kraus operators, that $$\begin{aligned} \rho(t)=\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)\rho(0)M_\mu(t)^\dagger, \label{rhot}\end{aligned}$$and $$\begin{aligned} \sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)=I, \label{mm}\end{aligned}$$ then the evolution of $\rho(t)$ is said to have operator-sum representation the Kraus representation. It has been known that a completely positive map always the representation a positive map may not do[@Kraus; @Preskill; @Pechukas; @Pomero; @Bouda; @Philip; @Gen; @Peixoto; @Mika; @Sonja]. The papers[@Peter; @Hayashi] furthermore pursued the existence of the Kraus by investigating the role initial correlations between the open and environment, and that map on the reduced in general, cannot be described as the Kraus representation in the presence of the initial correlations because additional inhomogeneous On the hand, know for a qubit a non-completely positive map $\$:\rho(0)\rightarrow\rho(t)$ does Kraus representation with the Kraus operators independent of the state can still be expressed in the of Eq. (\[rhot\]) with the operators $M_\mu(t)$ selected $\rho(0)$[@Philip; @Gen; @Tong1]. Arbitrary density matrices $\rho(t)$ of a qubit system can always be described of the operator-sum representation. start us to whether same is for $N$-dimensional That is, for any arbitrary time-dependent state $\rho(t)$ and initial state of an $N$-dimensional system, is it true that the operators can be found so (\[rhot\]) and (\[mm\]) are
)$ and $\rho(0)$ is in general not valid. to describe The evOluTioN oF an oPen sYstem, one usuallY EmplOys the Kraus representatIon[@KrAuS]. if thERe Exist OperatoRS $M_\MU(T)$, caLlEd kraUs OPeRatorS, thAt satisFy $$\begin{aliGneD}
\rHo(t)=\sum\limits_\MU M_\Mu(t)\rho(0)M_\mu(t)^\DagGer,
\label{rhot}\End{AligneD}$$aNd $$\bEGin{alIgnEd}
\sum\Limits_\MU M_\mu(t)^\dAgger M_\mu(t)=i, \lABel{mm}\eND{aligneD}$$ THeN the Evolution of $\rho(t)$ is SAiD To have operator-Sum repReSEnTATioN or The Kraus rePrEsentATion.

It hAS bEEN KnoWN that a completEly positive MAp aLways pOsSesSEs the oPeratOr-SUm rEpresentatiOn whIle a generAl posiTIve map mAY not do[@KRaus; @PrEskIll; @pechUKaS; @POmeRo; @bOudA; @phIliP; @gen; @peixoto; @MIkA; @SOnja]. THe paPERS[@peteR; @SaLgadO; @HayaShi] furthermorE puRsueD The ExistEnce oF the krAus rePresenTatioN bY investigating tHe roLe of initiAl cOrRelAtIons bETween tHe oPen System aNd its enVIroNmENT, AnD showed that a map basEd ON ThE reduced DynamiCS, iN gENeral, canNoT be DescRIBed as The KRAuS represeNtatioN In ThE presenCe Of the iNiTiaL coRrelaTIons BecausE an additIonal INhomogeneous paRT appears. On the OThER HaND, we kNow That for a qubIt sySTem, aLthoUGh A noN-ComplEtely PoSItIVe map $\$:\rho(0)\rightarrow\rHo(T)$ does nOt posSess the Kraus rEpresentatION With the KRaus OPeRAtors independeNt of $\rHo(0)$, the state $\RHo(t)=\$(\rho(0))$ caN stilL be expreSsed in the FORm of Eq. (\[rhOt\]) wIth The OpeRAToRs $M_\mu(t)$ selecteD FOr $\rhO(0)$[@PHilip; @GeN; @ToNg1]. ArbitRarY deNsiTy mAtRices $\rho(t)$ Of a qubit SyStEm CaN alWays bE DescribeD iN teRmS of The opERator-sUm repReseNtAtIOn. THis starT Us TO WondEr WhEtheR thE sAme prOperTY is Valid foR $N$-dimensiOnaL SystEmS. THat is, foR any arbitrary TiMe-dependenT sTatE $\rho(t)$ aND Initial sTate $\rho(0)$ of an $N$-dimensional SYstem, is It tRue thAt thE operatorS $M_\mU(t) $ can aLwaYS be fouNd so thAt (\[rhoT\]) aNd (\[mM\]) ARe
)$ and $\rho(0)$ is in gen eral not v alid.  To  de sc ribe  the  evolution ofa n op en system, one usually  empl oy s  the Kr aus r epresen t at i o n[@ Kr au s].  I f  t hereexi st oper ators $M_\ mu( t) $, called Kr a us  operators , t hat satisfy$$\ begin{ al ign e d}
\r ho( t)=\s um\lim i ts_\mu  M_\mu(t) \r h o(0)M_ \ mu(t)^\ d a gg er,\label{rhot}\end{ a li g ned}$$and $$\b egin{a li g ne d } 
\s um\ limits_\mu  M _\mu( t )^\dagg e rM _ \ mu( t )=I, \label{m m}\end{alig n ed} $$ the nthe evolut ion o f$ \rh o(t)$ is sa id t o have op erator - sum rep r esentat ion or  th e K raus re pr ese nt a tio n .
It has  been kn ow nthata co m p l e tely  po siti ve ma p always poss ess es t h e o perat or-su m re pr esent ationwhile  a  general positi ve m ap may no t d o[ @Kr au s; @P r eskill ; @ Pec hukas;@Pomero ;  @B ou d a ;  @ Philip; @Gen; @Pei xo t o ;@Mika; @ Sonja] .  T he papers[@ Pe ter ; @S a l gado;  @Ha y as hi] furt hermor e  p ur sued th eexiste nc e o f t he Kr a us r eprese ntationby in v estigating the role of initi a lc o rr e lati ons  between th e op e n sy stem an d i t s env ironm en t ,a nd showed that a ma pbasedon th e reduced dyn amics, ing e n eral, ca nnot be described as t he Kr aus repres e ntationin th e presen ce of the i nitial c orr ela tio nsb e ca use an additi o n al i nh omogene ous  part a ppe ars . O n t he  other ha nd, we k no wth at  fo r a q u bit syst em , a lt hou gh an on-com plete ly p os it i vemap $\$ : \r h o (0)\ ri gh tarr ow\ rh o(t)$  doe s  no t posse ss the Kr aus repr es en tationwith the Krau soperatorsin dep endent o f $\rho( 0)$, the state $\rho(t) = \$(\rho (0) )$ ca n st ill be ex pre ssed i n t h e form  of Eq . (\[ rh ot\ ] )  with t he  op er ators $M_\ m u (t) $ sel ec tedfor $\r ho(0)$[@Philip; @G e n;@Tong1]. Arbi tra ry d e n si tym at r ice s$ \rh o ( t)$ of a qubitsystem can  a l wa ys be desc r ibe din term s of th e ope r ator-su m represe ntation.Th is s t a rtus to wond er wheth er the sa m e pro p er ty is  va lid fo r$N$ -dime nsiona l  sy stems . That  i s, for  anyar bitrarytime-dependent state $\ rho(t) $ and  in itial sta te$ \rh o(0)$ ofan $ N$-dimensi ona l s ystem , i s  it t ruet ha t t h e ope rato r s $M_\mu( t )$ c a n  a lways be fo u n d  so  that  (\ [ rhot\] ) an d (\[mm\]) are
)$ and_$\rho(0)$ is_in general not valid._To describe_the_evolution of_an_open system, one_usually employs the_Kraus representation[@Kraus]. If there_exist operators $M_\mu(t)$,_called_Kraus operators, that satisfy $$\begin{aligned}
\rho(t)=\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)\rho(0)M_\mu(t)^\dagger,
\label{rhot}\end{aligned}$$and $$\begin{aligned}
\sum\limits_\mu M_\mu(t)^\dagger M_\mu(t)=I, \label{mm}\end{aligned}$$ then the evolution of_$\rho(t)$_is said_to_have_operator-sum representation or the Kraus_representation.

It has been known that_a completely_positive map always possesses the operator-sum representation while_a_general positive map_may not do[@Kraus; @Preskill; @Pechukas; @Pomero; @Bouda; @Philip; @Gen;_@Peixoto; @Mika; @Sonja]. The papers[@Peter; @Salgado;_@Hayashi] furthermore pursued_the_existence_of the Kraus representation_by investigating the role of initial_correlations between the open system and_its environment, and showed that a map_based on the reduced dynamics, in_general, cannot be described as_the Kraus_representation in the presence of_the initial correlations_because an_additional inhomogeneous part_appears. On the other hand, we_know that for_a qubit system, although a non-completely_positive_map $\$:\rho(0)\rightarrow\rho(t)$ does_not_possess_the Kraus_representation with the_Kraus_operators independent_of_$\rho(0)$, the state $\rho(t)=\$(\rho(0))$ can still_be_expressed in the form of Eq. (\[rhot\])_with the operators $M_\mu(t)$_selected_for $\rho(0)$[@Philip; @Gen; @Tong1]._Arbitrary density matrices $\rho(t)$ of_a qubit system can always be_described in_terms of_the operator-sum representation. This start us to wonder whether the same_property is valid for $N$-dimensional systems._That is, for any_arbitrary time-dependent_state_$\rho(t)$ and initial_state_$\rho(0)$ of_an $N$-dimensional system, is it true that_the operators_$M_\mu(t) $ can always be found_so that (\[rhot\]) and_(\[mm\])_are