 will refer in the following to these two groups of events as to 2-4 MeV $\gamma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s, although - above the 2615 keV line - the $\gamma$ group is empty. These two samples will be used to evaluate the difference in shape among $\beta$/$\gamma$ and $\alpha$ signals.

In Fig. \[fig:Impulso\] we compare two pulses obtained by averaging - separately - signals belonging to the 2615 keV $\gamma$-line and signals due to $\alpha$ particles that release a similar energy. The average is here needed to get rid of the noise that can mask the small differences among the pulses. The difference in shape can be appreciated in the bottom panel of Fig. \[fig:Impulso\].

The discriminating power D$_{RiseTime}$ of the heat pulse shape method can be defined exactly as done for D$_{Light}$: $$D_{RiseTime}(E) = \frac{RiseTime_{\beta/\gamma}-RiseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{\beta/\gamma}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2}}$$

where, however, the dependence on energy is here due only to the variation of the width of the rise-time distributions since the difference in rise-time appears to be independent on energy. The distribution obtained projecting the rise-time of 2-4 MeV $\gamma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s is shown in Fig. \[fig:camoo4\_light\] (right panel). A gaussian fit of the two peaks yields a rise-time of (5.788$\pm$0.017) ms for $\gamma$’s and of (5.649$\pm$0.013) ms for $\alpha$’s. D$_{RiseTime}$ results equal to 6.5 sigma. As for the D$_{Light}$ case, we can extrapolate the D$_{RiseTime}$ value also in the energy region where the $\alpha$ band is poorly populated, simply assuming that the distance between the two bands remains constant (as we observe) and D$_{RiseTime}$ changes because the width of the two distributions becomes larger, at low energies, due to noise. The result is that D$_{RiseTime}$ becomes lower than 2 sigma at 500 keV. In other words the 150 $\mu$s difference in rise-time of $\alpha$ and $\beta$/$\gamma
will refer in the following to these two groups of events as to 2 - 4   MeV $ \gamma$ ’s and 2 - 4   MeV $ \alpha$ ’s, although - above the 2615   keV course - the $ \gamma$ group is empty. These two sample will be used to evaluate the difference in form among $ \beta$/$\gamma$ and $ \alpha$ signals. 

 In Fig.   \[fig: Impulso\ ] we compare two pulses obtain by averaging - separately - signal belonging to the 2615 keV $ \gamma$-line and signals due to $ \alpha$ particle that release a similar department of energy. The average is here needed to get rid of the noise that can dissemble the small differences among the pulsation. The difference in shape can be appreciated in the bottom control panel of Fig.   \[fig: Impulso\ ]. 

 The discriminating power D$_{RiseTime}$ of the heat pulse human body method can be defined exactly as done for D$_{Light}$: $ $ D_{RiseTime}(E) = \frac{RiseTime_{\beta/\gamma}-RiseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{\beta/\gamma}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2}}$$ 

 where, however, the dependence on department of energy is here due only to the variation of the width of the rise - time distributions since the remainder in rise - time appears to be independent on energy. The distribution obtained projecting the rise - time of 2 - 4 MeV $ \gamma$ ’s and 2 - 4 MeV $ \alpha$ ’s is shown in Fig. \[fig: camoo4\_light\ ] (correct panel). A gaussian fit of the two bill yields a rise - time of (5.788$\pm$0.017)   ms for $ \gamma$ ’s and of (5.649$\pm$0.013)   ms for $ \alpha$ ’s. D$_{RiseTime}$ results adequate to 6.5 sigma. As for the D$_{Light}$ case, we can generalize the D$_{RiseTime}$ value also in the energy area where the $ \alpha$ band is poorly populated, simply assuming that the distance between the two bands remains constant (as we observe) and D$_{RiseTime}$ changes because the width of the two distributions becomes large, at low energy, due to noise. The result is that D$_{RiseTime}$ becomes lower than 2 sigma at 500 keV. In other word the 150 $ \mu$s difference in rise - time of $ \alpha$ and $ \beta$/$\gamma
 wipl refer in the followinn to these two gtoyps of eventa as to 2-4 OeV $\gamma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s, alvhouth - avove the 2615 keV line - the $\gamma$ grlup is enpty. Rhese two samples will bs useb vo evaluate the differenca in shape amotg $\bzta$/$\gamma$ and $\alpha$ signals.

In Fig. \[fig:Iipulso\] ee compare two polses jbtajned by averaging - separately - sighals benonging to thr 2615 keV $\gamma$-line and signaps dke to $\alpha$ particpes that reoeasq a similar evergy. The average is hgre needed to get rid of the noire thct can mask tye dkall differxnces wmong the pulses. The differrnce in shape gan bx appreciated in the bottmm panel of Fig. \[fig:Ympulso\].

Tha biscriminating power E$_{RuseTike}$ ox thd hext kulxe shape mevhod can be defined exqctly as done for D$_{Kidyt}$: $$D_{RiseTime}(E) = \frac{WifeTime_{\beta/\gamma}-RiseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{\beua/\gamja}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2}}$$

where, howevwr, the dependence on gnergy is rere due only to the variation of the width of tha risx-tkme dlstrkvuhions since the difference in rise-time appearf tp ne independent ok energy. The distrobktojn obtained ptojectiuf fhe rise-time of 2-4 MfV $\gammw$’s ane 2-4 MeV $\alkha$’s os shown in Fig. \[fig:camoo4\_ligyt\] (right panvl). A gaussian fit of tke two peaks yiekds a rise-time of (5.788$\pm$0.017) ms for $\gcmma$’s znd of (5.649$\pm$0.013) ms for $\alphz$’r. D$_{RiseTime}$ resuuts exual to 6.5 sigma. As for the Q$_{Light}$ cawe, wz can exgrapplate ehe D$_{RiseTlme}$ value also in the enfrgy tegion where the $\alpha$ band is poorly populated, simply assumimg thdt the dnstancc between the tro bands remaius constcnt (as we observv) and D$_{RiveTime}$ chandes because tvg width of thx two diseribytiobs becoods larger, at lpw energivs, due to noise. The resukt ka that D$_{RiseTimz}$ vecomes lower tnan 2 sygla ae 500 keV. In othar wurdr the 150 $\mu$s differcncd in rise-time of $\alpha$ atd $\bsta$/$\gamma
will refer in the following to these of as to MeV $\gamma$’s and above 2615 keV line the $\gamma$ group empty. These two samples will be to evaluate the difference in shape among $\beta$/$\gamma$ and $\alpha$ signals. In Fig. we compare two pulses obtained by averaging - separately - signals belonging to 2615 $\gamma$-line signals to $\alpha$ particles that release a similar energy. The average is here needed to get rid the noise that can mask the small differences the pulses. The difference shape can be appreciated in bottom of Fig. The power of the heat shape method can be defined exactly as done for D$_{Light}$: $$D_{RiseTime}(E) = \frac{RiseTime_{\beta/\gamma}-RiseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{\beta/\gamma}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2}}$$ where, however, the dependence energy is only to variation the of the rise-time the difference in rise-time appears to energy. The distribution obtained projecting the rise-time of MeV $\gamma$’s 2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s is shown in \[fig:camoo4\_light\] (right panel). A gaussian fit of the peaks yields a rise-time of (5.788$\pm$0.017) ms for $\gamma$’s and of (5.649$\pm$0.013) ms for $\alpha$’s. equal to 6.5 sigma. for the D$_{Light}$ we extrapolate D$_{RiseTime}$ also in energy region where the $\alpha$ band is poorly populated, simply assuming the distance between the two bands remains constant (as we D$_{RiseTime}$ because the width the two distributions becomes at energies, due to noise. is D$_{RiseTime}$ 2 at keV. In other words 150 $\mu$s difference in rise-time $\alpha$ and $\beta$/$\gamma
 will refer in the following to These two grOups oF evEntS aS to 2-4 MEV $\gaMma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\alphA$’S, altHough - above the 2615 keV line - thE $\gammA$ gROup iS EmPty. ThEse two sAMpLES wiLl Be UseD tO EvAluatE thE differEnce in shapE amOnG $\beta$/$\gamma$ anD $\AlPha$ signals.

in FIg. \[fig:Impulso\] We cOmpare TwO puLSes obTaiNed by AveragINg - sepaRately - sigNaLS belonGIng to thE 2615 KEV $\GammA$-line and signals duE To $\ALpha$ particles tHat relEaSE a SIMilAr eNergy. The avErAge is HEre needED tO GET riD Of the noise thaT can mask the SMalL diffeReNceS Among tHe pulSeS. the Difference iN shaPe can be apPreciaTEd in the BOttom paNel of FIg. \[fIg:IMpulSO\].

THe DisCrIMinATiNg pOWer d$_{RiseTimE}$ oF tHe heaT pulSE SHApe mEthOd caN be deFined exactly aS doNe foR d$_{LiGht}$: $$D_{RIseTiMe}(E) = \fRaC{Risetime_{\beTa/\gamMa}-riseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqRt{\siGma_{\beta/\gaMma}^2+\SiGma_{\AlPha}^2}}$$

whERe, howeVer, The DependeNce on enERgy Is HERE dUe only to the variatiOn OF ThE width of The risE-TiMe DIstributIoNs sInce THE diffErenCE iN rise-timE appeaRS tO bE indepeNdEnt on eNeRgy. the DistrIButiOn obtaIned projEctinG The rise-time of 2-4 MEv $\gamma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\ALpHA$’S iS ShowN in fig. \[fig:camoo4\_LighT\] (RighT panEL). A GauSSian fIt of tHe TWo PEaks yields a rise-time Of (5.788$\Pm$0.017) ms foR $\gammA$’s and of (5.649$\pm$0.013) ms foR $\alpha$’s. D$_{RiSEtIme}$ resulTs eqUAl TO 6.5 sigma. As for the d$_{LighT}$ case, we can EXtrapolaTe the d$_{RiseTimE}$ value alsO IN the enerGy rEgiOn wHerE THe $\Alpha$ band is poORLy poPuLated, siMplY assumiNg tHat The DisTaNce betweeN the two bAnDs ReMaIns ConstANt (as we obSeRve) AnD D$_{RIseTiME}$ changEs becAuse ThE wIDth Of the twO DiSTRibuTiOnS becOmeS lArger, At loW EneRgies, duE to noise. THe rESult Is ThAt D$_{Risetime}$ becomes loWeR than 2 sigma At 500 KeV. in otheR WOrds the 150 $\mU$s difference in rise-time oF $\Alpha$ anD $\beTa$/$\gamMa
 will refer in the followi ng to thes e two  gr oup sof e vent s as to 2-4 Me V  $\g amma$’s and 2-4 MeV $\ alpha $’ s , al t ho ugh -  abovet he 2 615  k eV  li ne -the $ \ga mma$ gr oup is emp ty.  T hese two sam p le s will beuse d to evaluat e t he dif fe ren c e insha pe am ong $\ b eta$/$ \gamma$ a nd $\alph a $ signa l s .
InFig. \[fig:Impuls o \] we compare two  pulse so bt a i ned  by  averaging  -  sepa r ately - si g n a lsb elonging to t he 2615 keV $\g amma$- li nea nd sig nalsdu e  to  $\alpha$ p arti cles that  relea s e a sim i lar ene rgy. T heave rage is  h ere  n e ede d  t o g e t r id of th eno ise t hatc a n mask  th e sm all d ifferences am ong  the pul ses.The d iffe re nce i n shap e can  b e appreciated i n th e bottompan el  of  F ig. \ [ fig:Im pul so\ ].

The  discri m ina ti n g po wer D$_{RiseTime}$  o f th e heat p ulse s h ap em ethod ca nbedefi n e d exa ctly as  done fo r D$_{ L ig ht }$: $$D _{ RiseTi me }(E ) =  \fra c {Ris eTime_ {\beta/\ gamma } -RiseTime_{\al p ha}}{\sqrt{\s i gm a _ {\ b eta/ \ga mma}^2+\sig ma_{ \ alph a}^2 } }$ $
w here,  howe ve r ,t he dependence on en er gy isheredue only to t he variati o n of the w idth of the rise-timedistr ibutions s i nce thediffe rence in  rise-tim e appearstobeind epe n d en t on energy.T h e di st ributio n o btained  pr oje cti ngth e rise-ti me of 2- 4Me V$\ gam ma$’s and 2-4Me V $ \a lph a$’si s show n inFig.  \ [f i g:c amoo4\_ l ig h t \] ( ri gh t pa nel ).  A ga ussi a n f it of t he two pe aks yiel ds  a  rise-t ime of (5.788 $\ pm$0.017)ms  fo r $\ga m m a$’s and  of (5.649$\pm$0.013) m s  for $\ alp ha$’s . D$ _{RiseTim e}$  resul tse qual t o 6.5sigma .Asf o r the D $_ {Li gh t}$ case,w e  ca n ext ra pola te theD$_{RiseTime}$ val u e a lso in the en erg y re g i on  wh e re the  $ \ alp h a $ band is poorl y populate d, si mply assum i ngth at thedistanc e bet w een the  two band s remains  c onst a n t ( as we obse rve) and  D$_{Rise T ime}$ ch anges  be causeth e w idthof the two  dist ributi on s beco mes l ar ger, atlow energies, due to no ise. T he re sul t is that  D$ _ {Ri seTime}$beco mes lowertha n 2  sigm a a t  500keV. In  ot h er wo rdst he 150 $\ m u$ s d i f fe rence in ri s e - tim e of$\a l pha$ a nd $ \beta$/$\gamma
 will_refer in_the following to these_two groups_of_events as_to_2-4 MeV $\gamma$’s and_2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s, although_- above the 2615 keV_line - the_$\gamma$_group is empty. These two samples will be used to evaluate the difference in_shape_among $\beta$/$\gamma$_and_$\alpha$_signals.

In Fig. \[fig:Impulso\] we compare two_pulses obtained by averaging -_separately -_signals belonging to the 2615 keV $\gamma$-line and_signals_due to $\alpha$_particles that release a similar energy. The average is_here needed to get rid of_the noise that_can_mask_the small differences among_the pulses. The difference in shape_can be appreciated in the bottom_panel of Fig. \[fig:Impulso\].

The discriminating power D$_{RiseTime}$ of_the heat pulse shape method can_be defined exactly as done_for D$_{Light}$:_$$D_{RiseTime}(E) = \frac{RiseTime_{\beta/\gamma}-RiseTime_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{\beta/\gamma}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2}}$$

where, however, the_dependence on energy_is here_due only to_the variation of the width of_the rise-time distributions_since the difference in rise-time appears_to_be independent on_energy._The_distribution obtained_projecting the rise-time_of_2-4 MeV_$\gamma$’s_and 2-4 MeV $\alpha$’s is shown_in_Fig. \[fig:camoo4\_light\] (right panel). A gaussian fit_of the two peaks_yields_a rise-time of (5.788$\pm$0.017) ms_for $\gamma$’s and of (5.649$\pm$0.013) ms_for $\alpha$’s. D$_{RiseTime}$ results equal to_6.5 sigma._As for_the D$_{Light}$ case, we can extrapolate the D$_{RiseTime}$ value also in_the energy region where the $\alpha$_band is poorly populated,_simply assuming_that_the distance between_the_two bands_remains constant (as we observe) and D$_{RiseTime}$_changes because_the width of the two distributions_becomes larger, at low_energies,_due to noise. The result is_that D$_{RiseTime}$ becomes lower than 2_sigma at 500 keV. In_other_words_the 150 $\mu$s difference in_rise-time of $\alpha$ and $\beta$/$\gamma