 \[peaks\_tab\] we see that the overall range of masses spans a factor of $\sim30$, from $\sim0.09$ to $\sim2.6$ times $10^{14}$M$_\odot$. The total mass enclosed within the peaks ($\sim5.0 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$) is about 10% of the total mass in the Hyperion proto-supercluster, while the volume enclosing all the peaks is a lower fraction of the volume of the entire proto-supercluster ($\sim6.5\%$), as expected given the higher average overdensity within the peaks. The most massive peak (peak \[1\]) is included in the NE structure, together with peak \[4\] which has one fifth the total mass of peak \[1\]. Peak \[2\], which corresponds to the SW structure, has a $M_{\rm tot}$ comparable to peak \[4\], and it is located at lower redshift. Peak \[3\], with a $M_{\rm tot}$ similar to peaks \[2\] and \[4\], is placed in the sort of filament shown in the middle panel of Fig. \[2D\_maps\]. At smaller $M_{\rm tot}$ there is peak \[5\], with the highest redshift ($z=2.507$), and peak \[6\], at slightly lower redshift. They both have $M_{\rm tot} \sim0.2 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. Finally, peak \[7\] is the least massive, and is very close in RA-Dec to peak \[2\], and at approximately the same redshift. In Appendix \[app\_Mtot\_sigma\] we show that the computation of $M_{\rm tot}$ is relatively stable if we slightly change the overdensity threshold used to define the peaks, with the exception of the least massive peak (peak \[7\]).

Figure \[3D\_cube\_peaks\] shows that the peaks have very different shapes, from irregular to more compact. We verified that their shape and position are not possibly driven by spectral sampling issues, by checking that the peaks persist through the $2^{\prime}$ gaps between the VIMOS quadrants from VUDS. This also implies that we are not missing high-density peaks that might fall in the gaps. We remind the reader that the zCOSMOS-Deep spectroscopic sample, which we use together with the VUDS sample, has a more uniform distribution in RA-Dec, and does not
\[peaks\_tab\ ] we see that the overall range of masses spans a agent of $ \sim30 $, from $ \sim0.09 $ to $ \sim2.6 $ prison term $ 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. The total mass enclosed within the flower ($ \sim5.0 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$) is about 10% of the total batch in the Hyperion proto - supercluster, while the volume enclosing all the extremum is a lower fraction of the volume of the integral proto - supercluster ($ \sim6.5\%$), as expected given the higher average overdensity within the bill. The most massive peak (peak \[1\ ]) is included in the NE structure, in concert with peak \[4\ ] which has one fifth the full mass of peak \[1\ ]. Peak \[2\ ], which match to the SW structure, have a $ M_{\rm tot}$ comparable to peak \[4\ ], and it is located at lower redshift. Peak \[3\ ], with a $ M_{\rm tot}$ similar to bill \[2\ ] and \[4\ ], is placed in the sort of filament shown in the middle panel of Fig.   \[2D\_maps\ ]. At smaller $ M_{\rm tot}$ there is peak \[5\ ], with the highest redshift ($ z=2.507 $), and peak \[6\ ], at slightly lower redshift. They both have $ M_{\rm tot } \sim0.2 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. Finally, peak \[7\ ] is the least massive, and is very near in RA - Dec to peak \[2\ ], and at approximately the same red shift. In Appendix \[app\_Mtot\_sigma\ ] we picture that the calculation of $ M_{\rm tot}$ is relatively stable if we slightly transfer the overdensity threshold used to define the peaks, with the exception of the least massive bill (peak \[7\ ]). 

 Figure \[3D\_cube\_peaks\ ] shows that the peaks have very different shapes, from atypical to more compact. We verified that their shape and position are not possibly driven by spectral sampling topic, by check that the peaks persist through the $ 2^{\prime}$ gaps between the VIMOS quadrant from VUDS. This also implies that we are not missing eminent - density peaks that might fall in the gaps. We prompt the reader that the zCOSMOS - Deep spectroscopic sample, which we use together with the VUDS sample distribution, has a more uniform distribution in RA - Dec, and does not
 \[peans\_tab\] we see that the ovtrall range of masses spens a fzctor of $\sim30$, from $\sim0.09$ to $\sim2.6$ times $10^{14}$M$_\ldit$. Tht total mass enclosdd within the peajs ($\smm5.0 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$) is about 10% of ths totcl mass in the Hiperion protm-supercluster, fhklz the volume enclosing all the peaks is a lpwfr fraction of the dolujv if the entire proto-superclustsr ($\sim6.5\%$), es expected givrn the higher average overfenslty within the peans. The most masfuve peak (peay \[1\]) is incllbed in the HE structure, together with peak \[4\] whieh has one didth jhe total maws of peak \[1\]. Peak \[2\], which cmrrespomds to the SW xtrnctuee, has a $M_{\rm tot}$ comperable to peak \[4\], and yt is locdtzd at lower redshift. Peqk \[3\], whth d $M_{\ro tog}$ sjmmlad to pfaka \[2\] and \[4\], is placed in rhe sort of filamenu sriwn in the misdle pwnql of Fig. \[2D\_maps\]. At smaller $M_{\rm tot}$ there is peak \[5\], with the highest redshift ($z=2.507$), and peak \[6\], at slighely lower redshift. They both have $M_{\rm tot} \sim0.2 \timas 10^{14}$M$_\ovog$. Fnkwuoy, peak \[7\] is the least massive, and is very close jn RS-Dec to peak \[2\], cnd at approximayepy jhe same redshkft. In Aplendix \[app\_Mtot\_sigmw\] we shjw thqt the coiputstion of $M_{\rm tot}$ is relativwly stable iy ww slightly change che overdensnty thtesholc used to define the pecks, wifh the exceotion of ffe least massive pesk (peak \[7\]).

Figure \[3D\_cube\_peaks\] shjws that vhe pzaks havd vety diffqrent shapfs, from irregular to morf comkact. Wa verified that their shape and position ece not possibky drpven by s'ectrak sampling isfues, by checkiug that che pexks persisn through the $2^{\prime}$ daps between dje VIMOS quavrants frjm VYDS. Rhis alru implies that we are not missing high-density peaks thxf might fall in tht taps. We remind thd rqafec thae the zCOSMOS-Geep spdvtroszopic samplc, wfich we use together witv ths VUDS sample, has s iore unidorm diseribution in TA-Dec, and does not
\[peaks\_tab\] we see that the overall range spans factor of from $\sim0.09$ to mass within the peaks \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$) is 10% of the total mass in Hyperion proto-supercluster, while the volume enclosing all the peaks is a lower fraction the volume of the entire proto-supercluster ($\sim6.5\%$), as expected given the higher average within peaks. most peak (peak \[1\]) is included in the NE structure, together with peak \[4\] which has one the total mass of peak \[1\]. Peak \[2\], corresponds to the SW has a $M_{\rm tot}$ comparable peak and it located lower Peak \[3\], with $M_{\rm tot}$ similar to peaks \[2\] and \[4\], is placed in the sort of filament shown in middle panel \[2D\_maps\]. At $M_{\rm there peak \[5\], with redshift ($z=2.507$), and peak \[6\], at They both have $M_{\rm tot} \sim0.2 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. peak \[7\] the least massive, and is very in RA-Dec to peak \[2\], and at approximately same redshift. In Appendix \[app\_Mtot\_sigma\] we show that the computation of $M_{\rm tot}$ is relatively we slightly change the threshold used to the with exception the least peak (peak \[7\]). Figure \[3D\_cube\_peaks\] shows that the peaks have very shapes, from irregular to more compact. We verified that their position not possibly driven spectral sampling issues, by that peaks persist through the between VIMOS This implies we are not missing peaks that might fall in gaps. We remind the sample, which we use together with the VUDS has a more uniform distribution in RA-Dec, does not
 \[peaks\_tab\] we see that the overaLl range of mAsses SpaNs a FaCtor Of $\siM30$, from $\sim0.09$ to $\sim2.6$ tIMes $10^{14}$M$_\Odot$. The total mass enclosEd witHiN The pEAkS ($\sim5.0 \tImes 10^{14}$M$_\odOT$) iS ABouT 10% oF tHe tOtAL mAss in The hyperioN proto-supeRclUsTer, while the vOLuMe enclosinG alL the peaks is a LowEr fracTiOn oF The voLumE of thE entirE Proto-sUperclustEr ($\SIm6.5\%$), as exPEcted giVEN tHe hiGher average overdeNSiTY within the peakS. The moSt MAsSIVe pEak (Peak \[1\]) is inclUdEd in tHE NE struCTuRE, TOgeTHer with peak \[4\] whIch has one fiFTh tHe totaL mAss OF peak \[1\]. PEak \[2\], whIcH CorResponds to tHe SW Structure, Has a $M_{\rM Tot}$ compARable to Peak \[4\], anD it Is lOcatED aT lOweR rEDshIFt. peaK \[3\], WitH a $M_{\rm tot}$ SiMiLar to PeakS \[2\] AND \[4\], Is plAceD in tHe sorT of filament shOwn In thE MidDle paNel of fig. \[2D\_MaPs\]. At sMaller $m_{\rm toT}$ tHere is peak \[5\], with tHe hiGhest redsHifT ($z=2.507$), And PeAk \[6\], at sLIghtly LowEr rEdshift. they botH HavE $M_{\RM TOt} \Sim0.2 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. FinalLy, PEAk \[7\] Is the leaSt massIVe, AnD Is very clOsE in rA-DeC TO peak \[2\], And aT ApProximatEly the SAmE rEdshift. in appendIx \[App\_mtoT\_sigmA\] We shOw that The compuTatioN Of $M_{\rm tot}$ is relaTIvely stable if WE sLIGhTLy chAngE the overdenSity THresHold USeD to DEfine The peAkS, WiTH the exception of the lEaSt massIve peAk (peak \[7\]).

Figure \[3D\_Cube\_peaks\] sHOWS that the PeakS HaVE very different ShapeS, from irregULar to morE compAct. We verIfied that THEir shape And PosItiOn aRE NoT possibly drivEN By spEcTral samPliNg issueS, by CheCkiNg tHaT the peaks Persist tHrOuGh ThE $2^{\prIme}$ gaPS between ThE VImOs quAdranTS from VuDS. ThIs alSo ImPLieS that we ARe NOT misSiNg High-DenSiTy peaKs thAT miGht fall In the gaps. we rEMind ThE rEader thAt the zCOSMOS-DEeP spectroscOpIc sAmple, wHICh we use tOgether with the VUDS samplE, Has a morE unIform DistRibution iN RA-dec, and DoeS Not
 \[peaks\_tab\] we see tha t the over all r ang e o fmass es s pans a factoro f $\ sim30$, from $\sim0.09 $ to$\ s im2. 6 $times  $10^{1 4 }$ M $ _\o do t$ . T he to tal m ass  enclos ed withinthe  p eaks ($\sim5 . 0\times 10^ {14 }$M$_\odot$)  is  about  1 0%o f the  to tal m ass in the Hy perion pr ot o -super c luster, w hi le t he volume enclosi n ga ll the peaks i s a lo we r  f r a cti onof the vol um e oft he enti r ep r o to- s upercluster ( $\sim6.5\%$ ) , a s expe ct edg iven t he hi gh e r a verage over dens ity withi n thep eaks. T h e mostmassiv e p eak  (pe a k\[ 1\] )i s i n cl ude d  in  the NEst ru cture , to g e t h er w ith  pea k \[4 \] which hasone  fif t h t he to tal m assof  peak  \[1\] . Pea k\[2\], which co rres ponds tothe  S W s tr uctur e , hasa $ M_{ \rm tot }$ comp a rab le t o  p eak \[4\], and itis l oc ated atlowerr ed sh i ft. Peak  \ [3\ ], w i t h a $ M_{\ r mtot}$ si milart ope aks \[2 \]  and \ [4 \],  is  plac e d in  the s ort of f ilame n t shown in the middle panelo fF i g. \[2D \_m aps\]. At s mall e r $M _{\r m  t ot} $  ther e ispe a k\ [5\], with the high es t reds hift($z=2.507$),and peak \ [ 6 \ ], at sl ight l yl ower redshift.  They  both have $M_{\rmtot}\sim0.2\times 10 ^ { 14}$M$_\ odo t$.  Fi nal l y ,peak \[7\] is t he l ea st mass ive , and i s v ery  cl ose  i n RA-Decto peak\[ 2\ ],  a ndat ap p roximate ly  th esam e red s hift.In Ap pend ix  \ [ app \_Mtot\ _ si g m a\]we  s howtha tthe c ompu t ati on of $ M_{\rm to t}$ is r el at ively s table if we s li ghtly chan ge  th e over d e nsity th reshold used to definet he peak s,withtheexception  of  the l eas t  massi ve pea k (pe ak  \[ 7 \ ]).
F i gu re\[ 3D\_cube\_ p e aks \] sh ow s th at thepeaks have very di f fer ent shapes, f rom  irr e g ul art om ore  c o mpa c t . We verified t hat theirsh a pe  and posit i onar e not p ossibly  driv e n by sp ectral sa mpling is su es,b y  ch ecking tha t the pe aks persi s t thr o ug h the  $2 ^{\pri me }$gapsbetwee n  th e VIM OS qua dr ants f rom V UD S. Thisalso implies that we ar e notmissi nghigh-dens ity pea ks that m ight  fall in t hegap s. We  re m ind t he r e ad ert hat t he z C OSMOS-Dee p  s pec t r os copic sampl e , whi ch we  us e  toget herwith the VUDS sam p le, has a more  uni f o rmdis t ribu ti on in RA-Dec,and  d o e s not
 \[peaks\_tab\] we_see that_the overall range of_masses spans_a_factor of_$\sim30$,_from $\sim0.09$ to_$\sim2.6$ times $10^{14}$M$_\odot$._The total mass enclosed_within the peaks_($\sim5.0_\times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$) is about 10% of the total mass in the Hyperion proto-supercluster, while_the_volume enclosing_all_the_peaks is a lower fraction_of the volume of the_entire proto-supercluster_($\sim6.5\%$), as expected given the higher average overdensity_within_the peaks. The_most massive peak (peak \[1\]) is included in the_NE structure, together with peak \[4\]_which has one_fifth_the_total mass of peak_\[1\]. Peak \[2\], which corresponds to_the SW structure, has a $M_{\rm_tot}$ comparable to peak \[4\], and it_is located at lower redshift. Peak_\[3\], with a $M_{\rm tot}$_similar to_peaks \[2\] and \[4\], is_placed in the_sort of_filament shown in_the middle panel of Fig. \[2D\_maps\]. At_smaller $M_{\rm tot}$_there is peak \[5\], with the_highest_redshift ($z=2.507$), and_peak_\[6\],_at slightly_lower redshift. They_both_have $M_{\rm_tot}_\sim0.2 \times 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. Finally, peak \[7\]_is_the least massive, and is very close_in RA-Dec to peak_\[2\],_and at approximately the_same redshift. In Appendix \[app\_Mtot\_sigma\]_we show that the computation of_$M_{\rm tot}$_is relatively_stable if we slightly change the overdensity threshold used to define_the peaks, with the exception of_the least massive peak_(peak \[7\]).

Figure_\[3D\_cube\_peaks\]_shows that the_peaks_have very_different shapes, from irregular to more compact._We verified_that their shape and position are_not possibly driven by_spectral_sampling issues, by checking that the_peaks persist through the $2^{\prime}$ gaps_between the VIMOS quadrants from_VUDS._This_also implies that we are_not missing high-density peaks that might_fall in the_gaps. We remind the reader that the_zCOSMOS-Deep_spectroscopic sample, which we use together_with_the VUDS sample, has a more_uniform_distribution_in RA-Dec, and does not