\[fig\_lattice\]. The lattice is composed of two discrete sheets. The origin $O=(0,0)$ is common for both sheets. The nodes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ of the first sheet are linked with corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$ of the second sheet. The nodes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ of the second sheet are linked with corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$ of the first sheet. The resulting discrete branched surface is referred to as ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ hereafter.

Each point of ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ except $(0,0)$ has exactly four neighbors in the lattice. Thus, one can look for a function $\tilde u$ defined on ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ and obeying equation (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$.

Let $u$ be the solution of the diffraction problem formulated in the Section \[subsec:form\]. Define the function $\tilde u$ on ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ by the following formulae: $$\tilde u(r, \phi) = u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox{ for } 0 \le \phi \le 2\pi, 
\label{eq1201a}$$ $$\tilde u(r, 4\pi - \phi) = -u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox{ for } 2\pi \le \phi \le 4\pi. 
\label{eq1201b}$$ We assume also that $\tilde u (0,0) =0$.

One can check that $\tilde u$ obeys equation (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$. This statement is trivial for $\phi$ not equal to $0$ or $2\pi$ and follows from the symmetry of the field for $\phi = 0, 2\pi$.

The new field $\tilde u$ has two incident field contributions. They are the plane wave $x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm in}^n$ on sheet 1, and the plane wave $-x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm in}^{-n}$ on sheet 2. The second wave is the reflection of the first one in the “mirror” coinciding with the half-line $\phi = 0$. Note that $(x_{\rm in},
\[fig\_lattice\ ]. The lattice is composed of two discrete sheets. The origin $ O=(0,0)$ is coarse for both sheet. The nodes $ n = 0 $, $ m > 0 $ of the first tabloid are linked with corresponding node $ normality = -1 $, $ m > 0 $ of the second sheet. The node $ n = 0 $, $ m > 0 $ of the second sheet are yoke with corresponding nodes $ north = -1 $, $ m > 0 $ of the inaugural sheet. The resulting discrete branched surface is referred to as $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 $ hereafter. 

 Each detail of $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 $ except $ (0,0)$ has exactly four neighbors in the wicket. Thus, one can look for a affair $ \tilde u$ defined on $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 $ and obey equation (\[eq0101h\ ]) on $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$. 

 get $ u$ be the solution of the diffraction problem formulated in the Section   \[subsec: form\ ]. Define the routine $ \tilde u$ on $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 $ by the following formulae: $ $ \tilde u(r, \phi) = u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox { for } 0 \le \phi \le 2\pi, 
 \label{eq1201a}$$ $ $ \tilde u(r, 4\pi - \phi) = -u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox { for } 2\pi \le \phi \le 4\pi. 
 \label{eq1201b}$$ We assume also that $ \tilde u (0,0) = 0$. 

 One can discipline that $ \tilde u$ obeys equality (\[eq0101h\ ]) on $ { \mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$. This statement is trivial for $ \phi$ not equal to $ 0 $ or $ 2\pi$ and follows from the symmetry of the field for $ \phi = 0, 2\pi$. 

 The new plain $ \tilde u$ have two incident field contributions. They are the plane wave $ x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm in}^n$ on sail   1, and the plane wave $ -x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm in}^{-n}$ on sheet   2. The second wave is the reflection of the inaugural one in the “ mirror ” coinciding with the half - line $ \phi = 0$. Note that $ (x_{\rm in },
\[fig\_pattice\]. The lattice is cumposed of two buscretx sheeta. The orkgin $O=(0,0)$ is common for both shxets. The bodes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ of the fkrst sheen are linjed xith correspondiif nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$ of vhe second sheej. The nodes $t = 0$, $m > 0$ of the sdclnd sheet are linked with corresponqing noced $n = -1$, $m > 0$ of tre fprft sgveu. The resulting discrete branched surfact is referred to ax ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ hereafter.

Each polnt lf ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ except $(0,0)$ has exactli fote neighbors kn the latuiee. Thus, one can look for a function $\tilde j$ defnned on ${\matybd{S}}_2$ wtd obeying xquatijn (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mabnbf{S}}_2 \satminus O$.

Let $u$ be the sonutuon of the diffractioi problem formulated in the Saccion \[subsec:form\]. Define tye futctimn $\tkode u$ kn ${\mzthbf{S}}_2$ by the follosing formulqe: $$\tilde u(r, \phi) = u(r, \prp) \qquad \mbox{ ror } 0 \je \phi \le 2\pi, 
\label{eq1201a}$$ $$\tilde u(r, 4\pi - \phi) = -u(g, \phj) \qquad \mbox{ for } 2\pi \le \phi \le 4\pi. 
\label{eq1201b}$$ Wg assume ajso that $\tilde u (0,0) =0$.

One can check that $\tilde u$ obeyv equetkon (\[ez0101f\]) oj ${\mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$. This statement is triviaj fpr $\phi$ not equal to $0$ or $2\pi$ snf gjllows from tfe symmetdy of the field fog $\phi = 0, 2\pi$.

Thw new fiejd $\tolde u$ has two incident fieod contributpons. They are the planz wave $x_{\rm iu}^m \, y_{\rk in}^n$ on sheet 1, and the plane wavs $-x_{\rm in}^m \, j_{\rm in}^{-n}$ oh sheet 2. The secona wsva is the reflection of the first onx in che “mirrur” cpincidyng with tje half-line $\phi = 0$. Note tjat $(x_{\tm in},
\[fig\_lattice\]. The lattice is composed of two The $O=(0,0)$ is for both sheets. $m 0$ of the sheet are linked corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m 0$ of the second sheet. The nodes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ the second sheet are linked with corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m > of first The discrete branched surface is referred to as ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ hereafter. Each point of ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ except $(0,0)$ has four neighbors in the lattice. Thus, one can for a function $\tilde defined on ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ and obeying (\[eq0101h\]) ${\mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus Let be solution of the problem formulated in the Section \[subsec:form\]. Define the function $\tilde u$ on ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ by the following formulae: u(r, \phi) \phi) \qquad for 0 \phi \le 2\pi, u(r, 4\pi - \phi) = -u(r, for } 2\pi \le \phi \le 4\pi. \label{eq1201b}$$ assume also $\tilde u (0,0) =0$. One can that $\tilde u$ obeys equation (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mathbf{S}}_2 O$. This statement is trivial for $\phi$ not equal to $0$ or $2\pi$ and follows symmetry of the field $\phi = 0, The field u$ two incident contributions. They are the plane wave $x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm in}^n$ sheet 1, and the plane wave $-x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm sheet The second wave the reflection of the one the “mirror” coinciding with $\phi 0$. in},
\[fig\_lattice\]. The lattice is comPosed of two DiscrEte SheEtS. The OrigIn $O=(0,0)$ is common for BOth sHeets. The nodes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ of the fiRst shEeT Are lINkEd witH corresPOnDINg nOdEs $N = -1$, $m > 0$ oF tHE sEcond SheEt. The noDes $n = 0$, $m > 0$ of the SecOnD sheet are linKEd With corresPonDing nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$ oF thE first ShEet. tHe resUltIng diScrete BRancheD surface iS rEFerred TO as ${\mathBF{s}}_2$ hEreaFter.

Each point of ${\maTHbF{s}}_2$ except $(0,0)$ has exacTly fouR nEIgHBOrs In tHe lattice. THuS, one cAN look foR A fUNCTioN $\Tilde u$ defined On ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ anD ObeYing eqUaTioN (\[Eq0101h\]) on ${\mAthbf{s}}_2 \sETmiNus O$.

Let $u$ be tHe soLution of tHe diffRAction pROblem foRmulatEd iN thE SecTIoN \[sUbsEc:FOrm\]. dEfIne THe fUnction $\tIlDe U$ on ${\maThbf{s}}_2$ BY THe foLloWing FormuLae: $$\tilde u(r, \phi) = U(r, \pHi) \qqUAd \mBox{ foR } 0 \le \phI \le 2\pI, 
\lAbel{eQ1201a}$$ $$\tildE u(r, 4\pi - \PhI) = -u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox{ For } 2\pI \le \phi \le 4\pI. 
\laBeL{eq1201B}$$ WE assuME also tHat $\TilDe u (0,0) =0$.

One cAn check THat $\TiLDE U$ oBeys equation (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mAtHBF{S}}_2 \Setminus o$. This sTAtEmENt is trivIaL foR $\phi$ NOT equaL to $0$ oR $2\Pi$ And folloWs from THe SyMmetry oF tHe fielD fOr $\pHi = 0, 2\pI$.

The nEW fieLd $\tildE u$ has two IncidENt field contribUTions. They are tHE pLANe WAve $x_{\Rm iN}^m \, y_{\rm in}^n$ on sHeet 1, ANd thE plaNE wAve $-X_{\Rm in}^m \, Y_{\rm in}^{-N}$ oN ShEEt 2. The second wave is thE rEflectIon of The first one in The “mirror” cOINCiding wiTh thE HaLF-line $\phi = 0$. Note thAt $(x_{\rm In},
\[fig\_lattice\]. The latt ice is com posed  of  tw odisc rete  sheets. The o r igin  $O=(0,0)$ is common f or bo th shee t s.  Thenodes $ n  = 0 $,$m  >  0$  o f  t he fi rst  sheetare linked  wi th  correspondi n gnodes $n =  -1 $, $m > 0$ o f t he sec on d s h eet.The  node s $n = 0$, $m  > 0$ ofth e  secon d  sheeta r elink ed with correspon d in g  nodes $n = -1 $, $m>0 $o f  th e f irst sheet .The r e sulting di s c r ete branched surf ace is refe r red  to as  $ {\m a thbf{S }}_2$  h e rea fter.

Each  poi nt of ${\ mathbf { S}}_2$e xcept $ (0,0)$  ha s e xact l yfo urne i ghb o rs  in the  lattice .Th us, o ne c a n l ookfor  a f uncti on $\tilde u$  de fine d  on  ${\m athbf {S}} _2 $ and  obeyi ng eq ua tion (\[eq0101h \])on ${\mat hbf {S }}_ 2\setm i nus O$ .
Let  $u$ be  the so l uti on o f  t he diffraction pro bl e m  f ormulate d in t h eSe c tion \[s ub sec :for m \ ]. De fine th e functi on $\t i ld eu$ on $ {\ mathbf {S }}_ 2$by th e  fol lowing  formula e: $$ \ tilde u(r, \ph i ) = u(r, \phi )  \ q q ua d  \mb ox{  for } 0 \l e \p h i \l e 2\ p i,  
\ l abel{ eq120 1a } $$ $$\tilde u(r, 4\pi-\phi)= -u( r, \phi) \qqu ad \mbox{f o r  } 2\pi\le\ ph i  \le 4\pi. 
\l abel{ eq1201b}$$ We assum e als o that $ \tilde u( 0 ,0) =0$. 

O necan  ch e c kthat $\tildeu $  obe ys  equati on(\[eq01 01h \])  on  ${ \m athbf{S}} _2 \setm in us  O $.  Th is st a tement i stri vi alfor $ \ phi$ n ot eq ualto  $ 0 $ o r $2\pi $  a n d  fol lo ws  fro m t he  symm etry ofthe fie ld for $\ phi = 0,  2 \p i$.

Th e new field $ \t ilde u$ ha stwo  incid e n t fieldcontributions. They are the pla newave$x_{ \rm in}^m  \,  y_{\r m i n }^n$ o n shee t 1,an d t h e  plan e wa ve$- x_{\rm in} ^ m  \,  y_{\ rm  in} ^{-n}$on sheet 2. The se c ond  wave is theref lect i o noft he fir st one i n the “mirror”coinciding  w i th  the half- l ine  $ \phi =0$. Not e tha t  $(x_{\ rm in},
\[fig\_lattice\]. The_lattice is_composed of two discrete_sheets. The_origin_$O=(0,0)$ is_common_for both sheets._The nodes $n_= 0$, $m >_0$ of the_first_sheet are linked with corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$ of the_second_sheet. The_nodes_$n_= 0$, $m > 0$_of the second sheet are_linked with_corresponding nodes $n = -1$, $m > 0$_of_the first sheet._The resulting discrete branched surface is referred to as_${\mathbf{S}}_2$ hereafter.

Each point of ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ except_$(0,0)$ has exactly_four_neighbors_in the lattice. Thus,_one can look for a function_$\tilde u$ defined on ${\mathbf{S}}_2$ and_obeying equation (\[eq0101h\]) on ${\mathbf{S}}_2 \setminus O$.

Let_$u$ be the solution of the_diffraction problem formulated in the_Section \[subsec:form\]. Define_the function $\tilde u$ on_${\mathbf{S}}_2$ by the_following formulae:_$$\tilde u(r, \phi)_= u(r, \phi) \qquad \mbox{ for_} 0 \le_\phi \le 2\pi, 
\label{eq1201a}$$ $$\tilde u(r,_4\pi_- \phi) =_-u(r,_\phi)_\qquad \mbox{_for } 2\pi_\le_\phi \le_4\pi._
\label{eq1201b}$$ We assume also that $\tilde_u_(0,0) =0$.

One can check that $\tilde u$_obeys equation (\[eq0101h\]) on_${\mathbf{S}}_2_\setminus O$. This statement_is trivial for $\phi$ not_equal to $0$ or $2\pi$ and_follows from_the symmetry_of the field for $\phi = 0, 2\pi$.

The new field $\tilde_u$ has two incident field contributions._They are the plane_wave $x_{\rm_in}^m_\, y_{\rm in}^n$_on_sheet 1, and_the plane wave $-x_{\rm in}^m \, y_{\rm_in}^{-n}$ on_sheet 2. The second wave is the_reflection of the first_one_in the “mirror” coinciding with the_half-line $\phi = 0$. Note that_$(x_{\rm in},