 2, and $\mu_3$ is the unique point, the vertex $p$, on both edges 1 and 2.

Set $M_i = \sum_{s \in \mu_i} s \otimes e_s \in
S_Q \otimes E$. Define $J_0 = \frac{M_1}{y_1} \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2}
\wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots y_s}$, an element of $S_{{\rm int}(3Q)}
\otimes E_{-3}$. A choice for the map $\Delta_0 \ : \ (S_0)^\ast
\otimes E(2) \to S_{int(3Q)} \otimes E(-1)$ is $1 \otimes 1 \mapsto
-J_0$.

The element $J_0$ is chosen so that $U_3(J_0)$ is the normalized toric Jacobian as constructed in [@CCD].

First note that the map $\Delta_0$ is determined by the image of $1
\otimes 1 \in (S_0)^\ast \otimes E_0$. By abuse of notation we denote $\Delta_0(1 \otimes 1)$ by just $\Delta_0$. By exactness, $\Delta_0$ is in the kernel of $\wedge m$ and not in the image of the previous map $\wedge m$. Furthermore, $\Delta_0$ is unique with respect to this property, up to a constant and modulo the image of $\wedge m$. Thus we need to check that our choice $J_0$ is also in the kernel of the horizontal map $\wedge m$, but not in the image of the previous map $\wedge m$. Finally, we argue that if we choose the constant -1, the determinant of the complex will be exactly the resultant (up to sign).

To start with we notice $m = M_1 + M_2 + M_3$, and so $J_0 \wedge m =
\frac{M_1}{y_1} \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2} \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots
y_s} \wedge (M_1 + M_2 + M_3) = 0$. So $J_0$ is indeed in the kernel of $\
2, and $ \mu_3 $ is the unique point, the vertex $ p$, on both edges 1 and 2. 

 Set $ M_i = \sum_{s \in \mu_i } s \otimes e_s \in 
 S_Q \otimes E$. Define $ J_0 = \frac{M_1}{y_1 } \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2 } 
 \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots y_s}$, an chemical element of $ S_{{\rm int}(3Q) } 
 \otimes E_{-3}$. A option for the map $ \Delta_0 \: \ (S_0)^\ast 
 \otimes E(2) \to S_{int(3Q) } \otimes E(-1)$ is $ 1 \otimes 1 \mapsto 
 -J_0$. 

 The element $ J_0 $ is choose so that $ U_3(J_0)$ is the normalize toric Jacobian as constructed in [ @CCD ]. 

 First notice that the map $ \Delta_0 $ is determined by the image of $ 1 
 \otimes 1 \in (S_0)^\ast \otimes E_0$. By maltreatment of notation we denote $ \Delta_0(1 \otimes 1)$ by barely $ \Delta_0$. By exactness, $ \Delta_0 $ is in the kernel of $ \wedge m$ and not in the image of the previous function $ \wedge m$. Furthermore, $ \Delta_0 $ is unique with respect to this place, up to a constant and modulo the picture of $ \wedge m$. Thus we need to check that our choice $ J_0 $ is besides in the kernel of the horizontal map $ \wedge m$, but not in the image of the former map $ \wedge m$. last, we argue that if we choose the constant -1, the antigenic determinant of the complex will be exactly the resultant (up to sign). 

 To begin with we notice $ m = M_1 + M_2 + M_3 $, and so $ J_0 \wedge m = 
 \frac{M_1}{y_1 } \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2 } \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots 
 y_s } \wedge (M_1 + M_2 + M_3) = 0$. So $ J_0 $ is indeed in the kernel of $ \
 2, ajd $\mu_3$ is the unique poinu, the vertex $p$, on both evges 1 ahd 2.

Set $M_k = \sum_{s \in \mu_i} s \otimes e_s \ii
S_Q \itimew E$. Define $J_0 = \frac{M_1}{y_1} \wddge \frac{L_2}{y_2}
\wedge \drac{N_3}{t_3\cdots y_s}$, eh elemekc of $A_{{\vm inc}(3Q)}
\itimes E_{-3}$. A cholce for the map $\Delta_0 \ : \ (V_0)^\art
\ltimes E(2) \to S_{int(3Q)} \otimes E(-1)$ is $1 \otimqs 1 \mapxtl
-J_0$.

The element $T_0$ is shossn so that $U_3(J_0)$ is the normalized todic Jacmbian as consyructed in [@CCD].

First note tjat hhe map $\Delta_0$ is dftermined bi thq image of $1
\otkmes 1 \in (S_0)^\ast \otimes E_0$. By abuse of notation we denote $\Deltc_0(1 \otimes 1)$ bi nudj $\Delta_0$. By eeactnefs, $\Delta_0$ is lm the nernel pf $\wedge m$ and nov in the image of the pretious map $\wedge m$. Futthermore, $\Gemta_0$ is unique wity eespewt tm thkw pfoptrtb, ul to a coistant and jodulo the umage of $\wedge m$. This qe need to chsck thwt our choice $J_0$ is also in the kernel of uhe hkrizontal map $\wedge m$, byt not in the image ov the predious map $\wedge m$. Finally, we argue that if we chomse tie couwtant -1, tje determinant of the complex will be exactly fht rvsultant (up to sinn).

To start with we nltose $m = M_1 + M_2 + M_3$, and so $J_0 \wedge m =
\frac{M_1}{y_1} \wefge \fras{M_2}{y_2} \wwdge \frac{I_3}{y_3\cdpts
y_s} \wedge (M_1 + M_2 + M_3) = 0$. So $J_0$ us indeed in rhe kernel of $\
2, and $\mu_3$ is the unique point, $p$, both edges and 2. Set s e_s \in S_Q E$. Define $J_0 \frac{M_1}{y_1} \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2} \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots y_s}$, element of $S_{{\rm int}(3Q)} \otimes E_{-3}$. A choice for the map $\Delta_0 \ \ (S_0)^\ast \otimes E(2) \to S_{int(3Q)} \otimes E(-1)$ is $1 \otimes 1 \mapsto The $J_0$ chosen that $U_3(J_0)$ is the normalized toric Jacobian as constructed in [@CCD]. First note that the map is determined by the image of $1 \otimes \in (S_0)^\ast \otimes E_0$. abuse of notation we denote \otimes by just By $\Delta_0$ in the kernel $\wedge m$ and not in the image of the previous map $\wedge m$. Furthermore, $\Delta_0$ is unique respect to up to constant modulo image of $\wedge we need to check that our also in the kernel of the horizontal map m$, but in the image of the previous $\wedge m$. Finally, we argue that if we the constant -1, the determinant of the complex will be exactly the resultant (up to start with we notice = M_1 + + and $J_0 m = \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2} \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots y_s} \wedge (M_1 + M_2 + M_3) 0$. So $J_0$ is indeed in the kernel of $\
 2, and $\mu_3$ is the unique point, the vErtex $p$, on boTh edgEs 1 aNd 2.

SEt $m_i = \suM_{s \in \Mu_i} s \otimes e_s \in
s_q \otiMes E$. Define $J_0 = \frac{M_1}{y_1} \wedge \Frac{M_2}{Y_2}
\wEDge \fRAc{m_3}{y_3\cdoTs y_s}$, an eLEmENT of $s_{{\rM iNt}(3Q)}
\OtIMeS E_{-3}$. A chOicE for the Map $\Delta_0 \ : \ (S_0)^\aSt
\oTiMes E(2) \to S_{int(3Q)} \oTImEs E(-1)$ is $1 \otimeS 1 \maPsto
-J_0$.

The elemEnt $j_0$ is choSeN so THat $U_3(J_0)$ Is tHe norMalizeD Toric JAcobian as CoNStructED in [@CCD].

FIRSt Note That the map $\Delta_0$ is DEtERmined by the imaGe of $1
\otImES 1 \iN (s_0)^\Ast \OtiMes E_0$. By abusE oF notaTIon we deNOtE $\dELta_0(1 \OTimes 1)$ by just $\DeLta_0$. By exactnESs, $\DElta_0$ is In The KErnel oF $\wedgE m$ ANd nOt in the imagE of tHe previouS map $\weDGe m$. FurtHErmore, $\DElta_0$ is UniQue With REsPeCt tO tHIs pROpErtY, Up tO a constaNt AnD moduLo thE IMAGe of $\WedGe m$. THus we Need to check thAt oUr chOIce $j_0$ is alSo in tHe keRnEl of tHe horiZontaL mAp $\wedge m$, but not iN the Image of thE prEvIouS mAp $\wedGE m$. FinaLly, We aRgue thaT if we chOOse ThE CONsTant -1, the determinant Of THE cOmplex wiLl be exACtLy THe resultAnT (up To siGN).

to staRt wiTH wE notice $m = m_1 + M_2 + M_3$, and SO $J_0 \WeDge m =
\fraC{M_1}{Y_1} \wedge \FrAc{M_2}{Y_2} \weDge \frAC{M_3}{y_3\cDots
y_s} \Wedge (M_1 + M_2 + M_3) = 0$. so $J_0$ is INdeed in the kernEL of $\
 2, and $\mu_3$ is the uni que point,  thever tex  $ p$,on b oth edges 1 an d  2.
Set $M_i = \sum_{s \i n \mu _i }  s \ o ti mes e _s \inS _Q \ oti me sE$.  D e fi ne $J _0= \frac {M_1}{y_1}  \w ed ge \frac{M_2 } {y _2}
\wedge  \f rac{M_3}{y_3 \cd ots y_ s} $,a n ele men t of$S_{{\ r m int} (3Q)}
\ot im e s E_{- 3 }$. A c h o ic e fo r the map $\Delta _ 0\  : \ (S_0)^\as t
\oti me s  E ( 2 ) \ toS_{int(3Q) }\otim e s E(-1) $  i s $ 1 \ o times 1 \maps to
-J_0$.
T heelemen t$J_ 0 $ is c hosen  s o  th at $U_3(J_0 )$ i s the nor malize d  toricJ acobian  as co nst ruc tedi n[@ CCD ]. 
Fi r st  no t e t hat thema p$\Del ta_0 $ i s  det erm ined  by t he image of $ 1
\ otim e s 1  \in(S_0) ^\as t\otim es E_0 $. By  a buse of notatio n we  denote $ \De lt a_0 (1  \oti m es 1)$  by  ju st $\De lta_0$. Byex a c t ne ss, $\Delta_0$ isin t he  kernelof $\w e dg em $ and no tinthei m age o f th e  p reviousmap $\ w ed ge  m$. Fu rt hermor e,  $\ Del ta_0$ is u niquewith res pectt o this propert y , up to a con s ta n t  a n d mo dul o the image  of$ \wed ge m $ .Thu s  we n eed t oc he c k that our choice $ J_ 0$ isalsoin the kernel  of the ho r i z ontal ma p $\ w ed g e m$, but notin th e image of the prev iousmap $\we dge m$. F i n ally, we  ar gue  th ati f  w e choose thec o nsta nt  -1, th e d etermin ant  of  th e c om plex will  be exac tl yth eres ultan t  (up tosi gn) .
To  star t  withwe no tice  $ m=  M_ 1 + M_2 +M _ 3$,an dso $ J_0  \ wedge  m = \fr ac{M_1} {y_1} \we dge \fra c{ M_ 2}{y_2}  \wedge \frac {M _3}{y_3\cd ot s
y _s} \w e d ge (M_1+ M_2 + M_3) = 0$. So $ J _0$ isind eed i n th e kernelof$\
 2,_and $\mu_3$_is the unique point,_the vertex_$p$,_on both_edges_1 and 2.

Set_$M_i = \sum_{s_\in \mu_i} s \otimes_e_s \in
S_Q \otimes_E$._Define $J_0 = \frac{M_1}{y_1} \wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2}
\wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots y_s}$, an element of $S_{{\rm int}(3Q)}
\otimes E_{-3}$._A_choice for_the_map_$\Delta_0 \ : \ (S_0)^\ast
\otimes_E(2) \to S_{int(3Q)} \otimes E(-1)$_is $1_\otimes 1 \mapsto
-J_0$.

The element $J_0$ is chosen so_that_$U_3(J_0)$ is the_normalized toric Jacobian as constructed in [@CCD].

First note that_the map $\Delta_0$ is determined by_the image of_$1
\otimes_1_\in (S_0)^\ast \otimes E_0$._By abuse of notation we denote_$\Delta_0(1 \otimes 1)$ by just $\Delta_0$._By exactness, $\Delta_0$ is in the kernel_of $\wedge m$ and not in_the image of the previous_map $\wedge_m$. Furthermore, $\Delta_0$ is unique_with respect to_this property,_up to a_constant and modulo the image of_$\wedge m$. Thus_we need to check that our_choice_$J_0$ is also_in_the_kernel of_the horizontal map_$\wedge_m$, but_not_in the image of the previous_map_$\wedge m$. Finally, we argue that if_we choose the constant_-1,_the determinant of the_complex will be exactly the_resultant (up to sign).

To start with_we notice_$m =_M_1 + M_2 + M_3$, and so $J_0 \wedge m =
\frac{M_1}{y_1}_\wedge \frac{M_2}{y_2} \wedge \frac{M_3}{y_3\cdots
y_s} \wedge (M_1_+ M_2 + M_3)_= 0$._So_$J_0$ is indeed_in_the kernel_of $\