0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)– (3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5)– (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)– (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,1.8) – (1.5,-0.2); (1.5,-0.6) – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)–(1.9,-0.5)–(1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) circle(1mm); (1.9,-0.5) circle(1mm); (1.5,-1.8) circle(1mm);

For subdivisions of edges in $\Sigma$, the result follows by extending the Pachner moves in the proof of the corresponding result in [@DPY] to a stark neighborhood formed by taking the join with a point on either side of the surface.

Subdivisions of triangles with interior in $M \setminus \Sigma$ are easily seen to be accomplished by a sequence of two flag-like Pachner moves, regardless of how the filtration restricts to the pair of tetrahedra sharing the triangular face: first perform a 1-4 Pachner move in one of the tetrahedra, as a subdivision, of flag-like triangulation this move is necessarily flag-like. The resulting complex than has the face to be subdivided shared by the other of the original tetrahedra and one of those from the subdivsion, whose interesection with lower-dimensional strata necessarily lies in the boundary of triangle being subdivided. The 2-3 Pachner move on this pair of tetrahedra is necessarily flag-like since the intersection with the lower dimensional strata lies entirely in the original tetrahedron, and performing it accomplished the desired subdivision.

The main difficulty in the proof of each statement comes from handling subdivisions of edges lying on the knot, the link of which has a different number of edges than that included in the set of moves, and subdivisions of edges with interior in the top dimensional stratum.

For the latter, we proceed as follows: first, observe that the link of any given edge is a polygon, and the star of the edge consists of tetrahedra including an edge of the link and the given edge (as one of its pairs of disjoint edges) and
0,0) – (1.5,-1.8) – (3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5) – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) – (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,1.8) – (1.5,-0.2); (1.5,-0.6) – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)–(1.9,-0.5)–(1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) circle(1 mm); (1.9,-0.5) circle(1 mm); (1.5,-1.8) circle(1 mm); 

 For subdivisions of edges in $ \Sigma$, the result follows by unfold the Pachner moves in the proof of the comparable result in [ @DPY ] to a bare neighborhood formed by take the join with a point on either slope of the surface. 

 Subdivisions of triangle with interior in $ M \setminus \Sigma$ are well seen to be accomplished by a sequence of two flag - like Pachner moves, regardless of how the filtration restricts to the couple of tetrahedra sharing the triangular face: foremost perform a 1 - 4 Pachner move in one of the tetrahedra, as a subdivision, of flag - alike triangulation this move is necessarily flag - like. The resulting building complex than has the face to be subdivided shared by the other of the original tetrahedra and one of those from the subdivsion, whose interesection with lower - dimensional level necessarily lies in the boundary of triangle being subdivided. The 2 - 3 Pachner move on this pair of tetrahedra is necessarily flag - like since the intersection with the lower dimensional stratum lies entirely in the original tetrahedron, and do it carry through the desired subdivision. 

 The main trouble in the proof of each instruction comes from handling subsection of edges lying on the knot, the link of which accept a different number of edges than that included in the hardening of moves, and subsection of edges with interior in the top dimensional stratum. 

 For the latter, we proceed as follows: foremost, observe that the link of any given edge is a polygon, and the star of the edge consists of tetrahedra including an boundary of the link and the given edge (as one of its pairs of disjoint edges) and
0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)– (3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5)– (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)– (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,1.8) – (1.5,-0.2); (1.5,-0.6) – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)–(1.9,-0.5)–(1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) circle(1mm); (1.9,-0.5) civcle(1mm); (1.5,-1.8) circle(1mm);

Yir subvivisiohs of edees in $\Sigma$, the result folllww by tqtending the Pachner ooves in nhe proof of uhe corresponding result lu [@DPY] bo a vvark neighborhopd formed ty taking the bokn with a point on either side of the surfacr.

Skbdivisions of trisgglea with interior in $M \setminus \Sigmz$ are eesily seen to br accomplished by a sequenfe ov two flag-like Pacjner moves, tsgaweless of how the filtration restridts to the pair of tetrahedra sfariny the triantuoar xace: first 'erfori a 1-4 Pachner move in one of the tetrahedrs, av a subdivision, of flag-lmke triangulation thys move iv uecessarily flag-like. Rhw resoltinc coopleb tgai hzs the fare to be sugdivided shqred by the other og eye original tstraheqrw and one of those from the subdivsion, fhoae interesection with liwer-dimensional stratw necessawily lies in the boundary of triangle being subdieided. Ghe 2-3 Iachvwr move on this pair of tetrahedra is necessarijg glsg-like since tme intersection wiyh tng lower dimenskonal strzta lies entirely ln the jrigibal tetraredrpn, and performing it accompoished the dvsirwd subdivision.

The lain difficblty im the proof of each statemenc comea from handping subdjxisions of edges lypng mn the knot, the link of whych has a difyerent njmbet of eddes than tjat ikwluded in the set lf mores, atd subdividions of edges with interior in the top dimenximnan stratui.

For bhe latter, we pwoceed as follpws: firft, obrerve that the liik of any giden edge is a kolygon, and tie star os thw edte conskrts of tetrahecra inclubnng an edte of the link and thg fiven edge (as out od its pairs of cisgoigt evges) wtd
0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)– (3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5)– (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)– (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,-0.2); – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) circle(1mm); (1.9,-0.5) of in $\Sigma$, the follows by extending Pachner moves in the proof of corresponding result in [@DPY] to a stark neighborhood formed by taking the join a point on either side of the surface. Subdivisions of triangles with interior $M \Sigma$ easily to be accomplished by a sequence of two flag-like Pachner moves, regardless of how the filtration to the pair of tetrahedra sharing the triangular first perform a 1-4 move in one of the as subdivision, of triangulation move necessarily flag-like. The complex than has the face to be subdivided shared by the other of the original tetrahedra and of those subdivsion, whose with strata lies in the triangle being subdivided. The 2-3 Pachner pair of tetrahedra is necessarily flag-like since the with the dimensional strata lies entirely in the tetrahedron, and performing it accomplished the desired subdivision. main difficulty in the proof of each statement comes from handling subdivisions of edges lying knot, the link of has a different of than included the set moves, and subdivisions of edges with interior in the top dimensional For the latter, we proceed as follows: first, observe that of given edge is polygon, and the star the consists of tetrahedra including of link edge one its pairs of disjoint and
0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)– (3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5)– (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)– (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,1.8) – (1.5,-0.2); (1.5,-0.6) – (1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)–(1.9,-0.5)–(1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8) circle(1mm); (1.9,-0.5) circle(1mm); (1.5,-1.8) circle(1mm);

FOr subdivisIons oF edGes In $\sigmA$, the Result follows bY ExteNding the Pachner moves in The prOoF Of thE CoRrespOnding rESuLT In [@DpY] To A stArK NeIghboRhoOd formeD by taking tHe jOiN with a point oN EiTher side of The Surface.

SubdiVisIons of TrIanGLes wiTh iNteriOr in $M \sETminus \sigma$ are eAsILy seen TO be accoMPLiShed By a sequence of two fLAg-LIke Pachner moveS, regarDlESs OF How The Filtration ReStricTS to the pAIr OF TEtrAHedra sharing tHe triangulaR FacE: first PeRfoRM a 1-4 PachNer moVe IN onE of the tetraHedrA, as a subdiVision, OF flag-liKE triangUlatioN thIs mOve iS NeCeSsaRiLY flAG-lIke. tHe rEsulting CoMpLex thAn haS THE Face To bE subDividEd shared by the OthEr of THe oRiginAl tetRaheDrA and oNe of thOse frOm The subdivsion, whOse iNteresectIon WiTh lOwEr-dimENsionaL stRatA necessArily liES in ThE BOUnDary of triangle beinG sUBDiVided. The 2-3 pachneR MoVe ON this paiR oF teTrahEDRa is nEcesSArIly flag-lIke sinCE tHe InterseCtIon witH tHe lOweR dimeNSionAl straTa lies enTirelY In the original tETrahedron, and pERfORMiNG it aCcoMplished the DesiREd suBdivISiOn.

THE main DiffiCuLTy IN the proof of each statEmEnt comEs froM handling subdIvisions of EDGEs lying oN the KNoT, The link of which Has a dIfferent nuMBer of edgEs thaN that incLuded in thE SEt of moveS, anD suBdiVisIONs Of edges with inTERior In The top dImeNsional StrAtuM.

FoR thE lAtter, we prOceed as fOlLoWs: FiRst, ObserVE that the LiNk oF aNy gIven eDGe is a pOlygoN, and ThE sTAr oF the edgE CoNSIsts Of TeTrahEdrA iNcludIng aN EdgE of the lInk and the GivEN edgE (aS oNe of its Pairs of disjoiNt Edges) and
0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)– (3,0.5);  (1.9,-0.5 )– (1 .5, -1. 8) ; (1 .5,1 .8)– (1.9,-0.5 ) ; (1 .5,1.8) – (1.5,-0.2);(1.5, -0 . 6) – (1 .5,-1 .8); (1 . 5, 1 . 8)– (1 .9 ,-0 .5 ) –( 1.5,- 1.8 ); (1.5 ,1.8) circ le( 1m m); (1.9,-0. 5 )circle(1mm );(1.5,-1.8) c irc le(1mm ); 

F o r sub div ision s of e d ges in  $\Sigma$ ,t he res u lt foll o w sby e xtending the Pach n er moves in the p roof o ft he c orr esp onding res ul t in[ @DPY] t o  a s t ark neighborhoodformed by t a kin g thejo inw ith apoint  o n  ei ther side o f th e surface .

Sub d ivision s  of tri angles  wi thinte r io rin$M \se t mi nus \Si gma$ are  e as ily s eent o b e ac com plis hed b y a sequenceoftwof lag -like  Pach nermo ves,regard lessof  how the filtra tion  restrict s t othe  p air o f  tetra hed rasharing  the tr i ang ul a r fa ce: first performa1 - 4Pachnermove i n  o ne of the t et rah edra , as asubd i vi sion, of  flag- l ik etriangu la tion t hi s m ove  is n e cess arilyflag-lik e. Th e  resulting com p lex than hast he f ac e  tobesubdividedshar e d by  the ot her of th e ori gi n al tetrahedra and oneof  those  from  the subdivsi on, whosei n t eresecti on w i th lower-dimensio nal s trata nece s sarily l ies i n the bo undary of t rianglebei ngsub div i d ed . The 2-3 Pac h n er m ov e on th ispair of  te tra hed rais  necessar ily flag -l ik esi nce  thei ntersect io n w it h t he lo w er dim ensio nalst ra t a l ies ent i re l y  inth eorig ina ltetra hedr o n,and per forming i t a c comp li sh ed thedesired subdi vi sion.

The  m ain  diffi c u lty in t he proof of each statem e nt come s f rom h andl ing subdi vis ions o f e d ges ly ing on  thekn ot, t he li n k  o f w hi ch has a d i f fer ent n um berof edge s than that includ e d i n the set ofmov es,a n dsub d iv i sio ns ofe d ges with interi or in theto p  d imensional str at um.

Fo r the l atter ,  we pro ceed as f ollows: f ir st,o b ser ve that th e link o f any giv e n edg e  i s a p oly gon, a nd  th e sta r of t h e e dge c onsist sof tet rahed ra  includi ng an edge of the linkand th e giv enedge (asone ofits pairs  ofdisjoint e dge s)and
0,0) –(1.5,-1.8)–_(3,0.5); (1.9,-0.5)–_(1.5,-1.8); (1.5,1.8)– (1.9,-0.5); (1.5,1.8)_– (1.5,-0.2);_(1.5,-0.6)_– (1.5,-1.8);_(1.5,1.8)–(1.9,-0.5)–(1.5,-1.8);_(1.5,1.8) circle(1mm); (1.9,-0.5)_circle(1mm); (1.5,-1.8) circle(1mm);

For_subdivisions of edges in_$\Sigma$, the result_follows_by extending the Pachner moves in the proof of the corresponding result in [@DPY]_to_a stark_neighborhood_formed_by taking the join with_a point on either side_of the_surface.

Subdivisions of triangles with interior in $M \setminus_\Sigma$_are easily seen_to be accomplished by a sequence of two flag-like_Pachner moves, regardless of how the_filtration restricts to_the_pair_of tetrahedra sharing the_triangular face: first perform a 1-4_Pachner move in one of the_tetrahedra, as a subdivision, of flag-like triangulation_this move is necessarily flag-like. The_resulting complex than has the_face to_be subdivided shared by the_other of the_original tetrahedra_and one of_those from the subdivsion, whose interesection_with lower-dimensional strata_necessarily lies in the boundary of_triangle_being subdivided. The_2-3_Pachner_move on_this pair of_tetrahedra_is necessarily_flag-like_since the intersection with the lower_dimensional_strata lies entirely in the original tetrahedron,_and performing it accomplished_the_desired subdivision.

The main difficulty_in the proof of each_statement comes from handling subdivisions of_edges lying_on the_knot, the link of which has a different number of edges_than that included in the set_of moves, and subdivisions_of edges_with_interior in the_top_dimensional stratum.

For_the latter, we proceed as follows: first,_observe that_the link of any given edge_is a polygon, and_the_star of the edge consists of_tetrahedra including an edge of the_link and the given edge_(as_one_of its pairs of disjoint_edges) and