 and $c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are non-vanishing for an extended wave-function with significant weight near both the $-L_x/2$ and the $L_x/2$ edges. Moreover, the height of this peak scales like $1/\delta$, so by varying $\delta$ we can easily locate the energies of the extended states.

### Green’s functions: local densities of states {#subs4}

We can also use Green’s functions techniques to image the local density of states at a given energy $E$. By definition (and neglecting Landau level mixing), the local density of states in the level $(n,\sigma)$ is: $$\rho_{n,\sigma}({{\bf r}};E) = \sum_{\alpha}^{} |\langle {{\bf r}}| n,
\alpha, \sigma\rangle |^2 \delta\left(E-E_{n,\alpha,\sigma}\right)$$ $${ \label{5.1} } = { 1 \over \pi} \mbox{Im}\langle {{\bf r}}| {\hat
 G}^{A}_{n,\sigma}(E)|{{\bf r}}\rangle,$$ where the second equality follows from Eq. (\[4.2\]). This function traces the contours of probability $|\phi_{n,\alpha,\sigma}({{\bf r}})|^2$ for electrons with the given energy $E$. Its direct computation, however, is difficult and very time-consuming.

For the rest of this subsection, the discussion is restricted to the Lowest Landau level $n=0$ (the value of $\sigma$ is irrelevant). We know that in the lowest Landau level, electronic wave-functions cannot be localized in any direction over a length-scale shorter that the magnetic length $l$. As a result, it suffices to compute a projected local density of states on a grid with $l\times l$ (or larger) spacings. The projection is made on maximally localized wave-function, defined as follows. Let ${{\bf r}}_0=(x_0,y_0)$ be a point on the grid. We associate it with a vector: $${ \label{5.2} } |x_0, y_0\rangle = \sum_{k_y}^{} |k_y\rangle \langle
k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ where we use the simplified notation $|k_y\
and $ c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are non - vanishing for an extended wave - function with significant weight near both the $ -L_x/2 $ and the $ L_x/2 $ edge. furthermore, the height of this peak scale like $ 1/\delta$, then by varying $ \delta$ we can easily settle the energy of the extended state. 

 # # # Green ’s functions: local densities of state { # subs4 } 

 We can also use Green ’s affair technique to image the local density of states at a given energy $ E$. By definition (and neglect Landau level mixing), the local density of state in the level $ (n,\sigma)$ is: $ $ \rho_{n,\sigma}({{\bf r}};E) = \sum_{\alpha}^ { } |\langle { { \bf r}}| n, 
 \alpha, \sigma\rangle |^2 \delta\left(E - E_{n,\alpha,\sigma}\right)$$ $ $ { \label{5.1 } } = { 1 \over \pi } \mbox{Im}\langle { { \bf r}}| { \hat 
  G}^{A}_{n,\sigma}(E)|{{\bf r}}\rangle,$$ where the second equality follows from Eq.   (\[4.2\ ]). This function traces the contour of probability $ |\phi_{n,\alpha,\sigma}({{\bf r}})|^2 $ for electrons with the given energy $ E$. Its direct computation, however, is unmanageable and very time - consuming. 

 For the rest of this subsection, the discussion is restricted to the Lowest Landau level $ n=0 $ (the value of $ \sigma$ is irrelevant). We acknowledge that in the lowest Landau level, electronic wave - functions cannot be localized in any direction over a length - scale shorter that the magnetic length $ l$. As a consequence, it suffices to compute a project local concentration of department of state on a grid with $ l\times l$ (or larger) spacing. The projection is made on maximally localized wave - function, specify as follows. Let $ { { \bf r}}_0=(x_0,y_0)$ be a point on the power system. We associate it with a vector: $ $ { \label{5.2 } } |x_0, y_0\rangle = \sum_{k_y}^ { } |k_y\rangle \langle 
 k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ where we use the simplified notation $ |k_y\
 anf $c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are non-vanlshing for an exjebded weve-funcfion witf significant weight near bovh tye $-L_x/2$ and the $L_x/2$ edges. Moreuver, the jeight od thms peak scales lmie $1/\delta$, so bg varviig $\delta$ we can easily lowate the energher lf the extended states.

### Green’s functyons: lovap densities of staues {#suba4}

We can also use Green’s functions fechniqles to image the kocal density of states at a glven energy $E$. By dffinition (abd nqtlecting Lanaau level mixing), the lkcal density of states in the ldvel $(u,\sigma)$ is: $$\ryo_{b,\sihka}({{\bf r}};E) = \sun_{\alphw}^{} |\langle {{\bf v}}| n,
\alphd, \sigma\tangle |^2 \delta\lcft(E-E_{i,\alpya,\sigma}\right)$$ $${ \label{5.1} } = { 1 \over \pi} \mbox{Im}\lwngle {{\bf s}}| {\kat
 G}^{A}_{n,\sigma}(E)|{{\bf r}}\rangoe,$$ wherg the secubd dquzlmty folloas hrom Eq. (\[4.2\]). Thia function rraces the contours os probability $|\lhi_{n,\al[hw,\sigma}({{\bf r}})|^2$ for electrons with the given ensrgy $E$. Its direct compuration, however, is difvicult anq very time-consuming.

For the rest of this subsectimn, thx aisemfruoj is restricted to the Lowest Landau level $n=0$ (ege vslue of $\sigma$ ls irrelevant). We kmoa yrat in the lodest Lchdzu level, electronif wave-fonctiobs cannot be kocalized in any direction iver a lengtk-scqle shorter that tke magnetic uengjh $l$. Ax a result, it suffices co comlute a projfcted loczu density of stages ot a grid with $l\times l$ (or jarger) specingx. The pfojevtion ys made on maximally localized wavf-funcjion, dafined as vollows. Let ${{\bf r}}_0=(x_0,y_0)$ be a point oi the grid. We avsobiate it cith a vector: $${ \labej{5.2} } |x_0, y_0\rangle = \xum_{k_y}^{} |k_v\rangld \langle
k_y| x_0,y_0\rangne,$$ where we use the simpnlfied notatimn $|k_y\
and $c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are non-vanishing for an extended significant near both $-L_x/2$ and the of peak scales like so by varying we can easily locate the energies the extended states. ### Green’s functions: local densities of states {#subs4} We can use Green’s functions techniques to image the local density of states at a energy By (and Landau level mixing), the local density of states in the level $(n,\sigma)$ is: $$\rho_{n,\sigma}({{\bf r}};E) = |\langle {{\bf r}}| n, \alpha, \sigma\rangle |^2 \delta\left(E-E_{n,\alpha,\sigma}\right)$$ \label{5.1} } = { \over \pi} \mbox{Im}\langle {{\bf r}}| G}^{A}_{n,\sigma}(E)|{{\bf where the equality from (\[4.2\]). This function the contours of probability $|\phi_{n,\alpha,\sigma}({{\bf r}})|^2$ for electrons with the given energy $E$. Its direct computation, however, difficult and For the of subsection, discussion is restricted Lowest Landau level $n=0$ (the value irrelevant). We know that in the lowest Landau electronic wave-functions be localized in any direction over length-scale shorter that the magnetic length $l$. As result, it suffices to compute a projected local density of states on a grid with (or larger) spacings. The is made on localized defined follows. ${{\bf r}}_0=(x_0,y_0)$ a point on the grid. We associate it with a vector: \label{5.2} } |x_0, y_0\rangle = \sum_{k_y}^{} |k_y\rangle \langle k_y| x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ use simplified notation $|k_y\
 and $c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are non-vanisHing for an eXtendEd wAve-FuNctiOn wiTh significant wEIght Near both the $-L_x/2$ and the $L_x/2$ eDges. MOrEOver, THe HeighT of this PEaK SCalEs LiKe $1/\dElTA$, sO by vaRyiNg $\delta$ We can easilY loCaTe the energieS Of The extendeD stAtes.

### Green’s fuNctIons: loCaL deNSitieS of StateS {#subs4}

WE Can alsO use Green’S fUNctionS TechniqUES tO imaGe the local density OF sTAtes at a given enErgy $E$. BY dEFiNITioN (anD neglectinG LAndau LEvel mixINg), THE LocAL density of staTes in the levEL $(n,\sIgma)$ is: $$\RhO_{n,\sIGma}({{\bf r}};e) = \sum_{\aLpHA}^{} |\laNgle {{\bf r}}| n,
\alpHa, \siGma\rangle |^2 \Delta\lEFt(E-E_{n,\alPHa,\sigma}\Right)$$ $${ \lAbeL{5.1} } = { 1 \ovEr \pi} \MBoX{IM}\laNgLE {{\bf R}}| {\HaT
 G}^{A}_{N,\SigMa}(E)|{{\bf r}}\raNgLe,$$ Where The sECOND equAliTy foLlows From Eq. (\[4.2\]). This funCtiOn trACes The coNtourS of pRoBabilIty $|\phi_{N,\alphA,\sIgma}({{\bf r}})|^2$ for electRons With the giVen EnErgY $E$. its diREct comPutAtiOn, howevEr, is difFIcuLt AND VeRy time-consuming.

For ThE REsT of this sUbsectIOn, ThE DiscussiOn Is rEstrICTed to The LOWeSt Landau Level $n=0$ (THe VaLue of $\siGmA$ is irrElEvaNt). WE know THat iN the loWest LandAu levEL, electronic wavE-Functions cannOT bE LOcALizeD in Any directioN oveR A lenGth-sCAlE shORter tHat thE mAGnETic length $l$. As a result, It SufficEs to cOmpute a projecTed local deNSITy of statEs on A GrID with $l\times l$ (or LargeR) spacings. THE projectIon is Made on maXimally loCALized wavE-fuNctIon, DefINEd As follows. Let ${{\bF R}}_0=(X_0,y_0)$ be A pOint on tHe gRid. We asSocIatE it WitH a Vector: $${ \labEl{5.2} } |x_0, y_0\rangLe = \SuM_{k_Y}^{} |k_Y\raNgle \lANgle
k_y| x_0,y_0\RaNglE,$$ wHerE we usE The simPlifiEd noTaTiON $|k_y\
 and $c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max })$ are no n-van ish ing  f or a n ex tended wave-fu n ctio n with significant wei ght n ea r  bot h  t he $- L_x/2$a nd t he$L _x /2$  e d ge s. Mo reo ver, th e height o f t hi s peak scale s  l ike $1/\de lta $, so by var yin g $\de lt a$w e can  ea silylocate the en ergies of  t h e exte n ded sta t e s. 

## # Green’s functio n s: local densitie s of s ta t es { #su bs4 }

We canal so us e  Green’ s  f u n c tio n s techniquesto image th e  lo cal de ns ity of sta tes a ta  gi ven energy$E$.  By defin ition( and neg l ectingLandau  le vel  mix i ng ),  th el oca l  d ens i tyof state sin  theleve l $ ( n,\s igm a)$is: $ $\rho_{n,\sig ma} ({{\ b f r }};E)  = \s um_{ \a lpha} ^{} |\ langl e{{\bf r}}| n,
\ alph a, \sigma \ra ng le|^ 2 \de l ta\lef t(E -E_ {n,\alp ha,\sig m a}\ ri g h t )$ $ $${ \label{5.1}}= {1 \over\pi} \ m bo x{ I m}\langl e{{\ bf r } } | {\h at
G }^ {A}_{n,\ sigma} ( E) |{ {\bf r} }\ rangle ,$ $ w her e the seco nd equ ality fo llows from Eq. (\[4. 2 \]). This fun c ti o n  t r aces  th e contoursof p r obab ilit y  $ |\p h i_{n, \alph a, \ si g ma}({{\bf r}})|^2$fo r elec trons  with the giv en energy$ E $ . Its di rect co m putation, howe ver,is difficu l t and ve ry ti me-consu ming.

Fo r the rest  of  th issub s e ct ion, the disc u s sion  i s restr ict ed to t heLow est  La nd au level$n=0$ (t he  v al ue  of  $\si g ma$ is i rr ele va nt) . Wek now th at in  the  l ow e stLandaul ev e l , el ec tr onic  wa ve -func tion s  ca nnot be  localize d i n  any  d ir ectionover a length -s cale short er  th at the m agneticlength $l$. As a result ,  it suf fic es to  com pute a pr oje cted l oca l  densi ty ofstate sona gridw i th  $l \t imes l$ (o r lar ger)sp acin gs. The  projection is mad e  on  maximally lo cal ized w av e-f u nc t ion ,d efi n e d as follows. L et ${{\bfr} } _0 =(x_0,y_0) $  be  a  pointon thegrid. We asso ciate itwith a ve ct or:$ $ { \ label{5.2}  } |x_0,  y_0\rang l e = \ s um _{k_y }^{ } |k_y \r ang le \l anglek _y|  x_0, y_0\ra ng le,$$where  w e use th e simplified notation $ |k_y\
 and_$c_{n,\alpha}(k_{\max})$ are_non-vanishing for an extended_wave-function with_significant_weight near_both_the $-L_x/2$ and_the $L_x/2$ edges._Moreover, the height of_this peak scales_like_$1/\delta$, so by varying $\delta$ we can easily locate the energies of the extended_states.

###_Green’s functions:_local_densities_of states {#subs4}

We can also_use Green’s functions techniques to_image the_local density of states at a given energy_$E$._By definition (and_neglecting Landau level mixing), the local density of states_in the level $(n,\sigma)$ is: $$\rho_{n,\sigma}({{\bf_r}};E) = \sum_{\alpha}^{}_|\langle_{{\bf_r}}| n,
\alpha, \sigma\rangle |^2_\delta\left(E-E_{n,\alpha,\sigma}\right)$$ $${ \label{5.1} } = {_1 \over \pi} \mbox{Im}\langle {{\bf r}}|_{\hat
 G}^{A}_{n,\sigma}(E)|{{\bf r}}\rangle,$$ where the second equality_follows from Eq. (\[4.2\]). This function traces_the contours of probability $|\phi_{n,\alpha,\sigma}({{\bf_r}})|^2$ for_electrons with the given energy_$E$. Its direct_computation, however,_is difficult and_very time-consuming.

For the rest of this_subsection, the discussion_is restricted to the Lowest Landau_level_$n=0$ (the value_of_$\sigma$_is irrelevant)._We know that_in_the lowest_Landau_level, electronic wave-functions cannot be localized_in_any direction over a length-scale shorter that_the magnetic length $l$._As_a result, it suffices_to compute a projected local_density of states on a grid_with $l\times_l$ (or_larger) spacings. The projection is made on maximally localized wave-function, defined_as follows. Let ${{\bf r}}_0=(x_0,y_0)$ be_a point on the_grid. We_associate_it with a_vector:_$${ \label{5.2}_} |x_0, y_0\rangle = \sum_{k_y}^{} |k_y\rangle \langle
k_y|_x_0,y_0\rangle,$$ where_we use the simplified notation $|k_y\