
 \frac{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\lambda_H} ~,\end{aligned}$$ and the correction in decouple for $w \to \infty$. For a vanishing Higgs mass parameter $\mu_H^2=0$ and for the Higgs being the lightest scalar, the vev of the extra scalar is therefore bounded from above. The requirement that the central value ($2\sigma$ upper bound) of $\lambda_H$ remains positive up to the Planck scale implies $$w \lesssim \left(\lambda_\Sigma\right)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \times 350 ~(470) ~ 
\text{GeV}~.$$ Here, we worked in the limit $\lambda_\Sigma w^2 \gg \lambda_H v^2$ and neglect the tiny $\lambda_{\Sigma H}$ contributions to the running of $\lambda_H$. In the limit in which $\lambda_{\Sigma} w^2 = \lambda_H v^2$ the bounds become $w \lesssim 3.5 (12.7)$ TeV. This corresponds to the extreme case of maximal mixing between the Higgs and the dark scalar. As we will discuss in Section \[sec:higgs\], the mixing is strongly constrained by collider bounds.

IR Instability
--------------

We now address the question of how to generate the vev for the scalar $\Sigma$. In particular, if not only the Higgs mass parameter, but all scales in the potential vanish in the UV, $\mu_H^2=\mu_\Sigma^2=0$, the vev of the extra scalar can only be induced radiatively, either through strong dynamics, in which a new condensation scale induces a mass term for the extra scalar [@Holthausen:2013ota; @Heikinheimo:2013fta; @Kubo:2014ova], or by a Coleman-Weinberg mechanism, in which the balance between the quartic and the one-loop corrections to the effective potential determine the vev [@Coleman:1973jx]. We will concentrate on the latter mechanism in the following.

In the limit of small Higgs portal coupling $|\lambda_{ \Sigma H}|\ll 
1$, we can consider the effective potential $V_\mathrm{eff}$ for the scalar independently from the Higgs boson. Its general one loop form is given by $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq:V
\frac{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\lambda_H } ~,\end{aligned}$$ and the correction in decouple for $ w \to \infty$. For a vanishing Higgs mass parameter $ \mu_H^2=0 $ and for the Higgs being the light scalar, the vev of the excess scalar is therefore bounded from above. The necessity that the cardinal value ($ 2\sigma$ upper bound) of $ \lambda_H$ remains positive up to the Planck plate incriminate $ $ w \lesssim \left(\lambda_\Sigma\right)^{-\frac{1}{4 } } \times 350 ~(470) ~ 
 \text{GeV}~.$$ Here, we ferment in the limit $ \lambda_\Sigma w^2 \gg \lambda_H v^2 $ and neglect the bantam $ \lambda_{\Sigma H}$ contributions to the running of $ \lambda_H$. In the limit in which $ \lambda_{\Sigma } w^2 = \lambda_H v^2 $ the bounds become $ watt \lesssim 3.5 (12.7)$   TeV. This corresponds to the extreme case of maximal mixing between the Higgs and the dark scalar. As we will discuss in Section   \[sec: higgs\ ], the mix is strongly constrained by collider bounds. 

 IR Instability 
 -------------- 

 We immediately address the question of how to render the vev for the scalar $ \Sigma$. In particular, if not merely the Higgs mass parameter, but all scales in the potential vanish in the UV, $ \mu_H^2=\mu_\Sigma^2=0 $, the vev of the excess scalar can only be induced radiatively, either through strong dynamics, in which a new condensation plate induce a mass term for the extra scalar   [ @Holthausen:2013ota; @Heikinheimo:2013fta; @Kubo:2014ova ], or by a Coleman - Weinberg mechanism, in which the balance between the quartic and the one - loop corrections to the effective potential determine the vev   [ @Coleman:1973jx ]. We will concentrate on the latter mechanism in the pursuit. 

 In the terminus ad quem of small Higgs portal coupling $ |\lambda _ { \Sigma H}|\ll 
 1 $, we can consider the effective electric potential $ V_\mathrm{eff}$ for the scalar independently from the Higgs boson. Its cosmopolitan one loop form is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{eq: V

 \frwc{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\laobda_H} ~,\end{aligneb}$$ and tie corrsction iv decouple for $w \to \infty$. Foc a canisying Higgs mass parameger $\mu_H^2=0$ ajd for tye Hmggs being the lmfhtest scalar, bhe vzv of the extra xcalar is dherefore boungea yrom above. The requirement that the sentral vwlue ($2\sigma$ uppgr bolnq) of $\lambda_H$ remains positive up to ths Plancn scale implirs $$w \lesssim \left(\lambda_\Sigla\rihht)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \times 350 ~(470) ~ 
\tfxt{GeV}~.$$ Here, we rirked in the limit $\lambda_\Sigma w^2 \gf \lambda_H v^2$ and neglect the tinh $\lamyda_{\Sigma H}$ xobtrltutions to vhe rugning of $\lamnca_H$. In the likit in which $\lsmbva_{\Sitma} w^2 = \lambda_H v^2$ the uounds become $w \lessfim 3.5 (12.7)$ TeV. Dhns corresponds to the eztremg casa of naxkmam kising bftwxen the Higfs and the eark scalar. As we wolj discuss in Ssction \[fes:higgs\], the mixing is strongly constraintd by collider bounds.

IR Instqbility
--------------

We now address the queseion of how to generate the vev for the scalar $\Sicma$. Ii oaruigmlar, uf not only the Higgs mass parameter, but all scwmex pn the potential yanish in the UV, $\mi_H^2=\lu_\Xygma^2=0$, the vev uf the exfra scalar can onlj be inquced radiativtly, eother through strong dynamixs, in which c nww condensation sccle induces c mass term for the extra scalar [@Houthahsen:2013ota; @Heininheimo:2013ffx; @Kubo:2014ova], or by x Cplaman-Weinberg mechanism, in rhich the balcnce betdeen the qtartic and the one-loop corrections to tke efxective pohential determine the vev [@Colemai:1973ox]. We will comcantgate on tke latber mechanism ig the followiny.

In the jimit of small Giggs pmrtal couplyng $|\lambda_{ \Sicla H}|\ll 
1$, we cen considqr tye edfectivd potential $V_\mayhrm{eff}$ for the scaoar independently nrom jhs Higgs boson. Icr general one lopp wori ps jiven ty $$\begin{aligted}
 \uabdk{eq:V
\frac{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\lambda_H} ~,\end{aligned}$$ and the correction for \to \infty$. a vanishing Higgs the being the lightest the vev of extra scalar is therefore bounded from The requirement that the central value ($2\sigma$ upper bound) of $\lambda_H$ remains positive to the Planck scale implies $$w \lesssim \left(\lambda_\Sigma\right)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \times 350 ~(470) ~ \text{GeV}~.$$ we in limit w^2 \gg \lambda_H v^2$ and neglect the tiny $\lambda_{\Sigma H}$ contributions to the running of $\lambda_H$. the limit in which $\lambda_{\Sigma} w^2 = \lambda_H the bounds become $w 3.5 (12.7)$ TeV. This corresponds the case of mixing the and the dark As we will discuss in Section \[sec:higgs\], the mixing is strongly constrained by collider bounds. IR Instability We now question of to the for the scalar particular, if not only the Higgs all scales in the potential vanish in the $\mu_H^2=\mu_\Sigma^2=0$, the of the extra scalar can only induced radiatively, either through strong dynamics, in which new condensation scale induces a mass term for the extra scalar [@Holthausen:2013ota; @Heikinheimo:2013fta; @Kubo:2014ova], or Coleman-Weinberg mechanism, in which balance between the and one-loop to effective potential the vev [@Coleman:1973jx]. We will concentrate on the latter mechanism in following. In the limit of small Higgs portal coupling $|\lambda_{ 1$, can consider the potential $V_\mathrm{eff}$ for the independently the Higgs boson. Its loop is \label{eq:V

 \frac{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\lamBda_H} ~,\end{aliGned}$$ aNd tHe cOrRectIon iN decouple for $w \tO \InftY$. For a vanishing Higgs masS paraMeTEr $\mu_h^2=0$ AnD for tHe Higgs BEiNG The LiGhTesT sCAlAr, the Vev Of the exTra scalar iS thErEfore bounded FRoM above. The rEquIrement that tHe cEntral VaLue ($2\SIgma$ uPpeR bounD) of $\lamBDa_H$ remAins positIvE Up to thE planck sCALe ImplIes $$w \lesssim \left(\laMBdA_\sigma\right)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \Times 350 ~(470) ~ 
\tExT{gev}~.$$ hEre, We wOrked in the LiMit $\laMBda_\SigmA W^2 \gG \LAMbdA_h v^2$ and neglect tHe tiny $\lambdA_{\sigMa H}$ conTrIbuTIons to The ruNnINg oF $\lambda_H$. In tHe liMit in whicH $\lambdA_{\sigma} w^2 = \lAMbda_H v^2$ tHe bounDs bEcoMe $w \lESsSiM 3.5 (12.7)$ Tev. THIs cORrEspONds To the extReMe Case oF maxIMAL MixiNg bEtweEn the higgs and the daRk sCalaR. as wE will DiscuSs in seCtion \[Sec:higGs\], the MiXing is strongly cOnstRained by cOllIdEr bOuNds.

IR iNstabiLitY
--------------

We Now addrEss the qUEstIoN OF HoW to generate the vev fOr THE sCalar $\SigMa$. In paRTiCuLAr, if not oNlY thE HigGS Mass pAramETeR, but all sCales iN ThE pOtentiaL vAnish iN tHe Uv, $\mu_h^2=\mu_\SiGMa^2=0$, thE vev of The extra ScalaR Can only be inducED radiatively, eIThER ThROugh StrOng dynamics, In whICh a nEw coNDeNsaTIon scAle inDuCEs A Mass term for the extra ScAlar [@HoLthauSen:2013ota; @HeikinhEimo:2013fta; @KubO:2014OVA], or by a CoLemaN-weINberg mechanism, In whiCh the balanCE between The quArtic and The one-looP COrrectioNs tO thE efFecTIVe Potential deteRMIne tHe Vev [@ColeMan:1973Jx]. We wilL coNceNtrAte On The latter MechanisM iN tHe FoLloWing.

IN The limit Of SmaLl higGs porTAl coupLing $|\lAmbdA_{ \SIgMA H}|\lL 
1$, we can cONsIDEr thE eFfEctiVe pOtEntiaL $V_\maTHrm{Eff}$ for tHe scalar iNdePEndeNtLy From the higgs boson. Its GeNeral one loOp ForM is givEN By $$\begin{aLigned}
 \label{eq:V

 \frac{v^2}{w^2}= -\frac{ \lambda_{\ Sigma  H} }{\ la mbda _H}~,\end{aligned } $$ a nd the correction in d ecoup le for$ w\to \ infty$. Fo r a v an is hin gH ig gs ma ssparamet er $\mu_H^ 2=0 $and for theH ig gs being t helightest sca lar , theve v o f  theext ra sc alar i s  there fore boun de d  froma bove. T h e  r equi rement that the c e nt r al value ($2\s igma$up p er b oun d)of $\lambd a_ H$ re m ains po s it i v e  up to the Planck  scale impl i es$$w \l es ssi m  \left (\lam bd a _\S igma\right) ^{-\ frac{1}{4 }} \ti m es 350~ (470) ~  
\tex t{G eV} ~.$$ He re , w ew ork e dint helimit $\ la mb da_\S igma w ^ 2  \gg  \l ambd a_H v ^2$ and negle ctthet iny  $\la mbda_ {\Si gm a H}$  contr ibuti on s to the runnin g of  $\lambda _H$ .Inth e lim i t in w hic h $ \lambda _{\Sigm a } w ^2 = \l ambda_H v^2$ the b ou n d sbecome $ w \les s si m3 .5 (12.7 )$  Te V. T h i s cor resp o nd s to the  extre m eca se of m ax imal m ix ing  be tween theHiggsand thedarks calar. As we w i ll discuss in Se c t io n  \[s ec: higgs\], th e mi x ingis s t ro ngl y  cons train ed by collider bounds.

I RInstab ility 
------------ --

We now a d dress th e qu e st i on of how to g enera te the vev for thescala r $\Sigm a$. In pa r t icular,ifnot  on lyt h eHiggs mass pa r a mete r,  but al l s cales i n t hepot ent ia l vanishin the U V,  $ \m u_ H^2 =\mu_ \ Sigma^2= 0$ , t he  ve v oft he ext ra sc alar  c an onl y be in d uc e d  rad ia ti vely , e it her t hrou g h s trong d ynamics,inw hich  a  n ew cond ensation scal einduces ama ssterm f o r  the ext ra scalar [@Holthausen: 2 013ota;  @H eikin heim o:2013fta ; @ Kubo:2 014 o va], o r by a  Cole ma n-W e i nberg m ec han is m, in whic h the  bala nc e be tween t he quartic and the one -loop correct ion s to t he  ef f ec t ive  p o ten t i al determine th e vev [@Co le m an :1973jx].W e w il l conce ntrateon th e  latter  mechanis m in thefo llow i n g.
In the li mit of s mall Higg s  port a lcoupl ing  $|\la mb da_ { \Si gma H} | \ll  
1$,  we ca nconsid er th eeffectiv e potential $V_\mathrm{ eff}$for t hescalar in dep e nde ntly from  the  Higgs bos on.  It s gen era l  oneloop fo rmi s giv en b y  $$\begin { al ign e d } \label{eq: V 

 \frac{v^2}{w^2}=_-\frac{\lambda_{\Sigma H}}{\lambda_H}_~,\end{aligned}$$ and the correction_in decouple_for_$w \to_\infty$._For a vanishing_Higgs mass parameter_$\mu_H^2=0$ and for the_Higgs being the_lightest_scalar, the vev of the extra scalar is therefore bounded from above. The requirement_that_the central_value_($2\sigma$_upper bound) of $\lambda_H$ remains_positive up to the Planck_scale implies_$$w \lesssim \left(\lambda_\Sigma\right)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \times 350 ~(470) ~ 
\text{GeV}~.$$_Here,_we worked in_the limit $\lambda_\Sigma w^2 \gg \lambda_H v^2$ and neglect_the tiny $\lambda_{\Sigma H}$ contributions to_the running of_$\lambda_H$._In_the limit in which_$\lambda_{\Sigma} w^2 = \lambda_H v^2$ the_bounds become $w \lesssim 3.5 (12.7)$ TeV._This corresponds to the extreme case of_maximal mixing between the Higgs and_the dark scalar. As we_will discuss_in Section \[sec:higgs\], the mixing is_strongly constrained by_collider bounds.

IR_Instability
--------------

We now address_the question of how to generate_the vev for_the scalar $\Sigma$. In particular, if_not_only the Higgs_mass_parameter,_but all_scales in the_potential_vanish in_the_UV, $\mu_H^2=\mu_\Sigma^2=0$, the vev of the_extra_scalar can only be induced radiatively, either_through strong dynamics, in_which_a new condensation scale_induces a mass term for_the extra scalar [@Holthausen:2013ota; @Heikinheimo:2013fta; @Kubo:2014ova], or_by a_Coleman-Weinberg mechanism,_in which the balance between the quartic and the one-loop corrections_to the effective potential determine the_vev [@Coleman:1973jx]. We will concentrate_on the_latter_mechanism in the_following.

In_the limit_of small Higgs portal coupling $|\lambda_{ \Sigma_H}|\ll 
1$,_we can consider the effective potential_$V_\mathrm{eff}$ for the scalar_independently_from the Higgs boson. Its general_one loop form is given by_$$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq:V