_u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}$. Mathematically, we may formulate this problem as: $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\mathbf{w},\mathbf{s}}\;\;\;\;\; &\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}\label{eq17} \\
\mbox{ s. t } \;\;\;\;\;&\mathbf{w}^H(\mathbf{v}(f_d)\otimes\mathbf{s}\otimes\mathbf{a}(\theta_t,\phi_t))=\kappa \nonumber \\
\;\;\;\;\;\; & \mathbf{s}^H \mathbf{s}\leq P_o \nonumber \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ In, the first constraint is the renowned,well known Capon constraint with $\kappa\in\mathbbm{R}$, typically $\kappa=1$. An energy constraint enforced via the second constraint is to addresses hardware limitation. Before we derive the solutions to the optimization problem, it is useful to recall Lem. \[crlemma\], which is well-known, used throughout this report but not stated explicitly. This fundamental result discusses the technique to compute stationary points of a real valued function w.r.t. its complex valued argument and its conjugate.

\[crlemma\] Let $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast}):\mathbbm{C}^N\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$. The stationary point of $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})$ is found from the three equivalent conditions, 1. $\nabla_{\bf x_r}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$ and $\nabla_{\bf x_i}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$, or 2. $\nabla_{\bf x}f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$, or 3. $\nabla_{\bf x^{\ast}} f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$. Here $\bar{f}:\mathbbm{R}^{N}\times\mathbbm{R}^{N}\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$ is the real equivalent of $f(\cdot,\cdot)$, $\mathbf{x_r}=\mathrm{Re
_ u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u } (\mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}$. Mathematically, we may formulate this problem as: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \min_{\mathbf{w},\mathbf{s}}\;\;\;\;\; & \mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u } (\mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}\label{eq17 } \\ 
 \mbox { s. t } \;\;\;\;\;&\mathbf{w}^H(\mathbf{v}(f_d)\otimes\mathbf{s}\otimes\mathbf{a}(\theta_t,\phi_t))=\kappa \nonumber \\ 
 \;\;\;\;\;\; & \mathbf{s}^H \mathbf{s}\leq P_o \nonumber \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ In, the first constraint is the celebrated, well know Capon constraint with $ \kappa\in\mathbbm{R}$, typically $ \kappa=1$. An energy constraint enforce via the second restraint is to addresses hardware limitation. Before we derive the solution to the optimization problem, it is useful to remember Lem.   \[crlemma\ ], which is well - known, used throughout this reputation but not stated explicitly. This fundamental resultant role discusses the technique to compute stationary points of a real value function w.r.t. its complex valued argument and its conjugate solution. 

 \[crlemma\ ] Let $ f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast}):\mathbbm{C}^N\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$. The stationary point of $ f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})$ is find from the three equivalent weather, 1. $ \nabla_{\bf x_r}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$ and $ \nabla_{\bf x_i}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$, or 2. $ \nabla_{\bf x}f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$, or 3. $ \nabla_{\bf x^{\ast } } f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$. Here $ \bar{f}:\mathbbm{R}^{N}\times\mathbbm{R}^{N}\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$ is the real equivalent of $ f(\cdot,\cdot)$, $ \mathbf{x_r}=\mathrm{Re
_u}|^2\}=\mahhbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mauhbf{w}$. Mathematically, we kay fodmulate ghis problem as: $$\begin{aligned}
\lib_{\mathvf{w},\mathbf{s}}\;\;\;\;\; &\mathbf{w}^H\matfbf{R_u}( \matjbf{s})\mathvf{w}\lebel{eq17} \\
\mbox{ s. t } \;\;\;\;\;&\mathbf{w}^M(\iathgn{v}(f_d)\ocines\mathbf{s}\otimgs\mathbf{a}(\theda_t,\phi_t))=\kappa \nmnjmyer \\
\;\;\;\;\;\; & \mathbf{s}^H \mathbf{s}\leq P_o \nonumbew \nonumneg\end{aligned}$$ In, the sirsf constraint is the renowned,well khown Cakon constraint witn $\kappa\in\mathbbm{R}$, typicallj $\kaopa=1$. An energy conshraint enfotded cia the secovd constraput is to adsresses hardware limitation. Befure wz derive thg aopotions to thx optiiization pronkem, it is usegul to recall Kem. \[rrlenma\], which is well-knowi, used throughout thys report bbt not stated explicirlt. Thiv futdamdbtau rtsukt discudsea the techhique to conpute stationary poonew of a real vzlued sugction w.r.t. its complex valued argument dnd its conjugate.

\[crlemma\] Lwt $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast}):\lathbbm{C}^N\wightarrow\mathbbm{R}$. The stationary point of $f(\mathbx{x},\matibw{x}^{\awt})=\nar{f}(\oqtjbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})$ is found from the three equivalqht cpnditions, 1. $\nabja_{\bf x_r}\bar{f}(\kahhns{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\majhbf{0}$ anb $\nzbla_{\bf x_i}\bar{f}(\mathbv{x_r},\mathff{x_i})=\mqthbf{0}$, or 2. $\nabka_{\bf x}f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\matybf{0}$, or 3. $\nablc_{\bf x^{\ast}} f(\mathbf{x},\mathyf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$. Herg $\bar{f}:\kathbbm{R}^{N}\times\mathbbm{R}^{N}\xightadrow\mathbbm{G}$ is the ddal equivalent ow $f(\bdot,\wdot)$, $\mathbf{x_r}=\mathrm{Re
_u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}$. Mathematically, we may formulate this $$\begin{aligned} &\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}\label{eq17} \mbox{ s. t & \mathbf{s}\leq P_o \nonumber In, the first is the renowned,well known Capon constraint $\kappa\in\mathbbm{R}$, typically $\kappa=1$. An energy constraint enforced via the second constraint is to hardware limitation. Before we derive the solutions to the optimization problem, it is to Lem. which well-known, used throughout this report but not stated explicitly. This fundamental result discusses the technique to stationary points of a real valued function w.r.t. complex valued argument and conjugate. \[crlemma\] Let $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast}):\mathbbm{C}^N\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$. The point $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})$ is from three conditions, 1. $\nabla_{\bf and $\nabla_{\bf x_i}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$, or 2. $\nabla_{\bf x}f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$, or 3. $\nabla_{\bf x^{\ast}} f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$. Here $\bar{f}:\mathbbm{R}^{N}\times\mathbbm{R}^{N}\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$ is the real of $f(\cdot,\cdot)$,
_u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mAthbf{w}$. MathEmatiCalLy, wE mAy foRmulAte this problem AS: $$\begIn{aligned}
\min_{\mathbf{w},\matHbf{s}}\;\;\;\;\; &\mAtHBf{w}^H\MAtHbf{R_u}( \Mathbf{s})\MAtHBF{w}\lAbEl{Eq17} \\
\mBoX{ S. t } \;\;\;\;\;&\MathbF{w}^H(\Mathbf{v}(F_d)\otimes\maThbF{s}\Otimes\mathbf{A}(\ThEta_t,\phi_t))=\kaPpa \Nonumber \\
\;\;\;\;\;\; & \mathBf{s}^h \mathbF{s}\Leq p_O \nonuMbeR \nonuMber\enD{AligneD}$$ In, the firSt COnstraINt is the RENoWned,Well known Capon conSTrAInt with $\kappa\in\MathbbM{R}$, TYpICAllY $\kaPpa=1$. An energY cOnstrAInt enfoRCeD VIA thE Second constraInt is to addrESseS hardwArE liMItatioN. BefoRe WE deRive the soluTionS to the optImizatIOn problEM, it is usEful to RecAll lem. \[cRLeMmA\], whIcH Is wELl-KnoWN, usEd througHoUt This rEporT BUT Not sTatEd exPliciTly. This fundamEntAl reSUlt DiscuSses tHe teChNique To compUte stAtIonary points of a Real Valued funCtiOn W.r.t. ItS compLEx valuEd aRguMent and Its conjUGatE.

\[cRLEMmA\] Let $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{X}^{\aST}):\MaThbbm{C}^N\rIghtarROw\MaTHbbm{R}$. The StAtiOnarY POint oF $f(\maTHbF{x},\mathbf{X}^{\ast})=\baR{F}(\mAtHbf{x_r},\maThBf{x_i})$ is FoUnd FroM the tHRee eQuivalEnt condiTions, 1. $\NAbla_{\bf x_r}\bar{f}(\maTHbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\MAtHBF{0}$ aND $\nabLa_{\bF x_i}\bar{f}(\mathBf{x_r},\MAthbF{x_i})=\mAThBf{0}$, oR 2. $\Nabla_{\Bf x}f(\mAtHBf{X},\Mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$, or 3. $\nAbLa_{\bf x^{\aSt}} f(\maThbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\aSt})=\mathbf{0}$. HeRE $\BAr{f}:\mathbBm{R}^{N}\TImES\mathbbm{R}^{N}\righTarroW\mathbbm{R}$ iS The real eQuivaLent of $f(\cDot,\cdot)$, $\maTHBf{x_r}=\mathRm{RE
_u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\math bf{R_u}( \ mathb f{s })\ ma thbf {w}$ . Mathematical l y, w e may formulate this p roble ma s: $ $ \b egin{ aligned } 
\ m i n_{ \m at hbf {w } ,\ mathb f{s }}\;\;\ ;\;\; &\ma thb f{ w}^H\mathbf{ R _u }( \mathbf {s} )\mathbf{w}\ lab el{eq1 7}  \\ \mbox { s . t }  \;\;\ ; \;\;&\ mathbf{w} ^H ( \mathb f {v}(f_d ) \ ot imes \mathbf{s}\otimes \ ma t hbf{a}(\theta_ t,\phi _t ) )= \ k app a \ nonumber \ \\;\;\ ; \;\;\;&  \ m a t hbf { s}^H \mathbf{ s}\leq P_o\ non umber\n onu m ber\en d{ali gn e d}$ $ In, the f irst  constrai nt ist he reno w ned,wel l know n C apo n co n st ra int  w i th$ \k app a \in \mathbbm {R }$ , typ ical l y $ \kap pa= 1$.An en ergy constrai ntenfo r ced  viathe s econ dconst raintis to  a ddresses hardwa re l imitation . B ef ore  w e der i ve the  so lut ions to  the op t imi za t i o nproblem, it is use fu l to  recallLem. \ [ cr le m ma\], wh ic h i s we l l -know n, u s ed  through out th i sre port bu tnot st at edexp licit l y. T his fu ndamenta l res u lt discusses t h e technique t o  c o m pu t e st ati onary point s of a re al v a lu edf uncti on w. r. t .i ts complex valued a rg umentand i ts conjugate. 

\[crlemm a \ ]  Let $f( \mat h bf { x},\mathbf{x}^ {\ast }):\mathbb m {C}^N\ri ghtar row\math bbm{R}$.T h e statio nar y p oin t o f $f (\mathbf{x},\ m a thbf {x }^{\ast })= \bar{f} (\m ath bf{ x_r }, \mathbf{x _i})$ is  f ou nd  f rom  thet hree equ iv ale nt  co nditi o ns, 1.  $\na bla_ {\ bf x_r }\bar{f } (\ m a thbf {x _r },\m ath bf {x_i} )=\m a thb f{0}$ a nd $\nabl a_{ \ bf x _i }\ bar{f}( \mathbf{x_r}, \m athbf{x_i} )= \ma thbf{0 } $ , or 2.$\nabla_{\bf x}f(\mathb f {x},\ma thb f{x}^ {\as t})=\math bf{ 0}$, o r 3 .  $\nab la_{\b f x^{ \a st} } f(\ma t h bf {x} ,\ mathbf{x}^ { \ ast })=\m at hbf{ 0}$. He re $\bar{f}:\mathb b m{R }^{N}\times\m ath bbm{ R } ^{ N}\ r ig h tar ro w \ma t h bbm{R}$ is thereal equiv al e nt  of $f(\cd o t,\ cd ot)$, $ \mathbf {x_r} = \mathrm {Re
_u}|^2\}=\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}( \mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}$._Mathematically, we_may formulate this problem_as: $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\mathbf{w},\mathbf{s}}\;\;\;\;\;_&\mathbf{w}^H\mathbf{R_u}(_\mathbf{s})\mathbf{w}\label{eq17} \\
\mbox{_s._t } \;\;\;\;\;&\mathbf{w}^H(\mathbf{v}(f_d)\otimes\mathbf{s}\otimes\mathbf{a}(\theta_t,\phi_t))=\kappa_\nonumber \\
\;\;\;\;\;\; &_\mathbf{s}^H \mathbf{s}\leq P_o \nonumber_\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ In, the_first_constraint is the renowned,well known Capon constraint with $\kappa\in\mathbbm{R}$, typically $\kappa=1$. An energy constraint_enforced_via the_second_constraint_is to addresses hardware limitation._Before we derive the solutions_to the_optimization problem, it is useful to recall Lem. \[crlemma\],_which_is well-known, used_throughout this report but not stated explicitly. This fundamental_result discusses the technique to compute_stationary points of_a_real_valued function w.r.t. its_complex valued argument and its conjugate.

\[crlemma\]_Let $f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast}):\mathbbm{C}^N\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$. The stationary point of_$f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})$ is found from the three equivalent_conditions, 1. $\nabla_{\bf x_r}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$ and $\nabla_{\bf_x_i}\bar{f}(\mathbf{x_r},\mathbf{x_i})=\mathbf{0}$, or 2. $\nabla_{\bf x}f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$,_or 3._$\nabla_{\bf x^{\ast}} f(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}^{\ast})=\mathbf{0}$. Here $\bar{f}:\mathbbm{R}^{N}\times\mathbbm{R}^{N}\rightarrow\mathbbm{R}$_is the real_equivalent of_$f(\cdot,\cdot)$, $\mathbf{x_r}=\mathrm{Re