 to the mocks, the latter effect is less trivial to account for. Here we have modeled the zero-point photometry offset by adding a randomly oriented dipole normalized such that the corresponding rms over all galaxies is $\delta m_{\rm dipole}=0.01$ for each individual mock galaxy catalog. Our results suggest that the systematic tilt in the observed galaxy magnitudes is sufficiently described by this dipole contribution.

-   Accounting for the known systematics in the SDSS photometry, the estimated “bulk flows” are consistent with the predictions of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model at $\ltsim 1$–$2\sigma$ confidence in both redshift bins. The combined analysis of the corresponding three Cartesian components further corroborates this result. Using an independent estimator, this confirms the findings of the CMB studies in refs. [@Osborne2011; @planck_bf] which provide an upper bulk flow limit of a few hundred km s$^{-1}$ at a $95$% confidence limit on similar scales.

-   Our analysis yields direct constraints on the angular velocity power spectrum $C_{l}$ (considering terms up to the octupole) defined in section \[section2c\], independent of a prior on the cosmological model. All of the estimated $C_{l}$ are consistent with the corresponding theoretical power spectra of the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.

-   Assuming a prior on the $C_{l}$ as dictated by the $\Lambda$CDM model with fixed density parameters and a Hubble constant, we have used the method to infer the parameter $\sigma_{8}$ which determines the amplitude of the velocity field. After correcting for known systematics, we obtain $\sigma_{8}\approx 1.1\pm 0.4$ for the combination of both redshift bins and $\sigma_{8}\approx 1.0\pm 0.5$ for the low-redshift bin only. As anticipated, the found constraints on velocity moments and $\sigma_{8}$ are not very tight. However, they show the validity of our approach in view of future analyses with different datasets.

-   As for the encountered data-inherent issues, current and next-generation spectroscopic surveys are designed to alleviate most of them, thanks to their large sky coverage (e.g., eBOSS[^11], DESI [@bigboss2011; @Levi2013]) and improved photometric calibration in ground-based surveys (e.g., PAN-STARRS [@Kaiser2002
to the mocks, the latter effect is less trivial to account for. Here we have model the zero - item photometry offset by adding a randomly oriented dipole normalize such that the corresponding rms over all galaxies is $ \delta m_{\rm dipole}=0.01 $ for each individual mock galax catalog. Our results suggest that the systematic joust in the observed galaxy magnitude is sufficiently described by this dipole contribution. 

 -    Accounting for the known systematics in the SDSS photometry, the estimate “ bulk flows ” are consistent with the predictions of the standard $ \Lambda$CDM model at $ \ltsim 1$–$2\sigma$ confidence in both red shift bins. The combined analysis of the corresponding three Cartesian part further corroborates this consequence. Using an autonomous estimator, this confirm the findings of the CMB studies in refs. [ @Osborne2011; @planck_bf ] which leave an upper bulk flow limit of a few hundred km s$^{-1}$ at a $ 95$% confidence limit on similar scales. 

 -    Our analysis yields direct constraints on the angular velocity power spectrum $ C_{l}$ (considering terms up to the octupole) defined in part \[section2c\ ], independent of a prior on the cosmological mannequin. All of the estimate $ C_{l}$ are consistent with the corresponding theoretical power spectra of the $ \Lambda$CDM cosmology. 

 -    simulate a prior on the $ C_{l}$ as dictated by the $ \Lambda$CDM model with fixed density argument and a Hubble constant, we have used the method to infer the parameter $ \sigma_{8}$ which determines the amplitude of the velocity airfield. After correcting for known systematics, we obtain $ \sigma_{8}\approx 1.1\pm 0.4 $ for the combination of both redshift bank identification number and $ \sigma_{8}\approx 1.0\pm 0.5 $ for the low - red shift bank identification number merely. As anticipated, the found constraints on speed moments and $ \sigma_{8}$ are not very tight. However, they show the validity of our approach in view of future analyses with different datasets. 

 -    As for the encountered data - implicit in issues, current and adjacent - generation spectroscopic surveys are plan to alleviate most of them, thanks to their bombastic sky coverage (e.g., eBOSS[^11 ], DESI [ @bigboss2011; @Levi2013 ]) and better photometric calibration in ground - free-base surveys (e.g., PAN - STARRS [ @Kaiser2002
 to the mocks, the latter efnect is less trirual to accouht for. Hdre we have modeled the zero-'oinr phoujmetry offset by aading a rwndomly irieited dipole normemized smeh thzb the rorresponding rks over aln galaxies is $\geutc m_{\rm dipole}=0.01$ for each individual moch galaxu fatalog. Our refultx sugfvsu that the systematic tilt in the observtd galaxy magnitudrs is sufficiently describfd bj this dipole contgibution.

-   Qccotbting for thd known systematics in the SDSS photometry, the estimaged “bblk flows” atz cojvistent witi the iredictions on the sdandard $\Lambda$CDM modcl at $\ltwim 1$–$2\sigma$ confidence mn both redshift binf. The comtiued analysis of the cireespotdinc thfwe Zaruesman compojenvs further dorroboratew this result. Using ag independent sstimaeow, this confirms the findings of the CMB sthdies in refs. [@Osborne2011; @poanck_bf] which provide an upper bulk flow limit of a few hundred km s$^{-1}$ at a $95$% confhdencx uimnb ub dimilar scales.

-   Our analysis yields direct cjhsurapnts on the angulcr velocity powet dprstrum $C_{l}$ (conskderiny tsrms up to the octkpole) dgfined in sectijn \[srction2c\], independent of a pruor on the cjwmological model. Apl of the ertimsted $V_{l}$ are consistent with che codresponding theoretidxl power spectra of tve $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.

-   Afsuming a pripr on tfe $C_{k}$ as dyctated by the $\Lambda$CDM model witj fixgd denvity paramfters and a Hubble constant, we ieve used the kedhog to infzr the parameter $\sidma_{8}$ which detetmines thz amplktude of tge velority field. Aster correctith for known vystematycs, qe ovtain $\skema_{8}\approx 1.1\pm 0.4$ gor the combination of both redshift nins xhd $\sigma_{8}\approx 1.0\'o 0.5$ for the low-recshkft bpn pnjf. As anticipdted, thd founa constrainbs un vrlocity moments and $\vigmz_{8}$ are not very tignt. However, they shjw the validiyy of our approach in vmew of futute wnalyses with different datasefs.

-   As flr bhe encounterqd dqta-inherent nssues, current and next-generation spectriscopic surveys ate designed to allevictt most of thek, thagks to thair large sky coverate (e.g., eBOSS[^11], DESI [@nigboss2011; @Levi2013]) and improbed phmtomehric calibration in ground-based surveys (e.g., PAN-STARRS [@Kaiser2002
to the mocks, the latter effect is to for. Here have modeled the a oriented dipole normalized that the corresponding over all galaxies is $\delta m_{\rm for each individual mock galaxy catalog. Our results suggest that the systematic tilt the observed galaxy magnitudes is sufficiently described by this dipole contribution. - Accounting the systematics the photometry, the estimated “bulk flows” are consistent with the predictions of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model at 1$–$2\sigma$ confidence in both redshift bins. The combined of the corresponding three components further corroborates this result. an estimator, this the of CMB studies in [@Osborne2011; @planck_bf] which provide an upper bulk flow limit of a few hundred km s$^{-1}$ at a confidence limit scales. - analysis direct on the angular spectrum $C_{l}$ (considering terms up to in section \[section2c\], independent of a prior on cosmological model. of the estimated $C_{l}$ are consistent the corresponding theoretical power spectra of the $\Lambda$CDM - Assuming a prior on the $C_{l}$ as dictated by the $\Lambda$CDM model with fixed and a Hubble constant, have used the to the $\sigma_{8}$ determines the of the velocity field. After correcting for known systematics, we obtain 1.1\pm 0.4$ for the combination of both redshift bins and 0.5$ the low-redshift bin As anticipated, the found on moments and $\sigma_{8}$ are tight. they of approach view of future analyses different datasets. - As for encountered data-inherent issues, current designed to alleviate most of them, thanks to large sky coverage (e.g., eBOSS[^11], DESI [@bigboss2011; and improved photometric calibration in ground-based surveys (e.g., PAN-STARRS [@Kaiser2002
 to the mocks, the latter effect Is less trivIal to AccOunT fOr. HeRe we Have modeled the ZEro-pOint photometry offset by AddinG a RAndoMLy OrienTed dipoLE nORMalIzEd SucH tHAt The coRreSpondinG rms over alL gaLaXies is $\delta m_{\RM dIpole}=0.01$ for eaCh iNdividual mocK gaLaxy caTaLog. oUr resUltS suggEst thaT The sysTematic tiLt IN the obSErved gaLAXy MagnItudes is sufficienTLy DEscribed by this Dipole CoNTrIBUtiOn.

-   ACcounting fOr The knOWn systeMAtICS In tHE SDSS photometRy, the estimaTEd “bUlk floWs” Are COnsistEnt wiTh THe pRedictions oF the Standard $\LAmbda$Cdm model aT $\Ltsim 1$–$2\siGma$ conFidEncE in bOTh ReDshIfT BinS. thE coMBinEd analysIs Of The coRresPONDIng tHreE CarTesiaN components fuRthEr coRRobOrateS this ResuLt. using An indePendeNt Estimator, this coNfirMs the findIngS oF thE CmB stuDIes in rEfs. [@osbOrne2011; @plaNck_bf] whICh pRoVIDE aN upper bulk flow limiT oF A FeW hundred Km s$^{-1}$ at a $95$% COnFiDEnce limiT oN siMilaR SCales.

-   our aNAlYsis yielDs direCT cOnStraintS oN the anGuLar VelOcity POwer SpectrUm $C_{l}$ (consIderiNG terms up to the oCTupole) defined IN sECTiON \[secTioN2c\], independeNt of A PrioR on tHE cOsmOLogicAl modEl. aLl OF the estimated $C_{l}$ are cOnSistenT with The correspondIng theoretICAL power spEctrA Of THe $\Lambda$CDM cosMologY.

-   Assuming a PRior on thE $C_{l}$ as Dictated By the $\LambDA$cDM model WitH fiXed DenSITy Parameters and A hUbblE cOnstant, We hAve used The MetHod To iNfEr the paraMeter $\sigMa_{8}$ WhIcH dEteRmineS The ampliTuDe oF tHe vElociTY field. after CorrEcTiNG foR known sYStEMAticS, wE oBtaiN $\siGmA_{8}\apprOx 1.1\pm 0.4$ FOr tHe combiNation of bOth REdshIfT bIns and $\sIgma_{8}\approx 1.0\pm 0.5$ fOr The low-redsHiFt bIn only. aS AnticipaTed, the found constraints oN VelocitY moMents And $\sIgma_{8}$ are noT veRy tighT. HoWEver, thEy show The vaLiDitY OF our aPPRoAch In View of futuRE AnaLyses WiTh diFferent Datasets.

-   As for the enCOunTered data-inheRenT issUES, cUrrENt ANd nExT-GenERAtion spectroscoPic surveys ArE DeSigned to alLEviAtE most of Them, thaNks to THeir larGe sky coveRage (e.g., eBOsS[^11], dESI [@BIGboSs2011; @Levi2013]) and iMproved pHotometriC CalibRAtIon in GroUnd-basEd SurVeys (e.G., PAN-STarRS [@kaiseR2002
 to the mocks, the lattereffect islesstri via lto a ccou nt for. Here w e  hav e modeled the zero-poi nt ph ot o metr y  o ffset  by add i ng a  ra nd om lyor i en ted d ipo le norm alized suc h t ha t the corres p on ding rms o ver  all galaxie s i s $\de lt a m _ {\rmdip ole}= 0.01$f or eac h individ ua l  mockg alaxy c a t al og.Our results sugge s tt hat the system atic t il t  i n the  ob served gal ax y mag n itudesi ss u f fic i ently describ ed by thisd ipo le con tr ibu t ion.
-   A cc o unt ing for the  kno wn system aticsi n the S D SS phot ometry , t heesti m at ed  “b ul k  fl o ws ” a r e c onsisten twi th th e pr e d i c tion s o f th e sta ndard $\Lambd a$C DM m o del  at $ \ltsi m 1$ –$ 2\sig ma$ co nfide nc e in both redsh iftbins. The  co mb ine danaly s is ofthe  co rrespon ding th r eeCa r t e si an components furt he r co rroborat es thi s  r es u lt. Usin ganinde p e ndent  est i ma tor, thi s conf i rm sthe fin di ngs of  t heCMB  stud i es i n refs . [@Osbo rne20 1 1; @planck_bf] which provide an u pp e r bu lkflow limitof a fewhund r ed  km s$^{- 1}$ a ta  $ 9 5$% confidence limi ton sim ilarscales.

-  Our analys i s yields d irec t  c o nstraints on t he an gular velo c ity powe r spe ctrum $C _{l}$ (co n s ideringter msuptot h eoctupole) def i n ed i nsection  \[ section 2c\ ],ind epe nd ent of aprior on  t he  c os mol ogica l  model.Al l o fthe  esti m ated $ C_{l} $ ar eco n sis tent wi t ht h e co rr es pond ing  t heore tica l  po wer spe ctra of t he$ \Lam bd a$ CDM cos mology.

-  As suming a p ri oron the $ C_{l}$ a s dictated by the $\Lam b da$CDMmod el wi th f ixed dens ity  param ete r s anda Hubb le co ns tan t ,  we h a v euse dthe method t o i nferth e pa rameter  $\sigma_{8}$ whic h  de termines theamp litu d e  o f t h ev elo ci t y f i e ld. After corre cting forkn o wn  systemati c s,we  obtain  $\sigm a_{8} \ approx1.1\pm 0. 4$ for th ecomb i n ati on of both  redshif t bins an d  $\si g ma _{8}\ app rox 1. 0\ pm0.5$for th e  lo w-red shiftbi n only . Asan ticipate d, the found constraint s on v eloci tymoments a nd$ \si gma_{8}$arenot very t igh t.Howev er, theyshow th e v a lidit y of our appro a ch  in v ie w of future a n aly ses w ith differ entdatasets.

-   As for the encoun tere d dat a-i n here nt  issues, curre ntan d next-gen er ation spect roscopic  s u rveys  are d esigne d to al l e vi a te mos t of  th em, thank s t ot heir la rg es ky cov erag e(e.g.,  eBOSS [ ^11] , DESI [@bigboss20 11; @ L e vi201 3 ])and i mp roved p h otom etric cali bration inground -bas ed su rveys ( e. g., PA N-S TA RRS [@Kais e r2002
 to_the mocks,_the latter effect is_less trivial_to_account for._Here_we have modeled_the zero-point photometry_offset by adding a_randomly oriented dipole_normalized_such that the corresponding rms over all galaxies is $\delta m_{\rm dipole}=0.01$ for each_individual_mock galaxy_catalog._Our_results suggest that the systematic_tilt in the observed galaxy_magnitudes is_sufficiently described by this dipole contribution.

-  _Accounting_for the known_systematics in the SDSS photometry, the estimated “bulk flows”_are consistent with the predictions of_the standard $\Lambda$CDM_model_at_$\ltsim 1$–$2\sigma$ confidence in_both redshift bins. The combined analysis_of the corresponding three Cartesian components_further corroborates this result. Using an independent_estimator, this confirms the findings of_the CMB studies in refs._[@Osborne2011; @planck_bf]_which provide an upper bulk_flow limit of_a few_hundred km s$^{-1}$_at a $95$% confidence limit on_similar scales.

- _ Our analysis yields direct constraints_on_the angular velocity_power_spectrum_$C_{l}$ (considering_terms up to_the_octupole) defined_in_section \[section2c\], independent of a prior_on_the cosmological model. All of the estimated_$C_{l}$ are consistent with_the_corresponding theoretical power spectra_of the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.

- _ Assuming a prior on the_$C_{l}$ as_dictated by_the $\Lambda$CDM model with fixed density parameters and a Hubble constant,_we have used the method to_infer the parameter $\sigma_{8}$_which determines_the_amplitude of the_velocity_field. After_correcting for known systematics, we obtain $\sigma_{8}\approx_1.1\pm 0.4$_for the combination of both redshift_bins and $\sigma_{8}\approx 1.0\pm_0.5$_for the low-redshift bin only. As_anticipated, the found constraints on velocity_moments and $\sigma_{8}$ are not_very_tight._However, they show the validity_of our approach in view of_future analyses with_different datasets.

-   As for the_encountered_data-inherent issues, current and next-generation spectroscopic_surveys_are designed to alleviate most of_them,_thanks_to their large sky coverage_(e.g., eBOSS[^11], DESI [@bigboss2011; @Levi2013]) and_improved photometric calibration in ground-based surveys (e.g., PAN-STARRS [@Kaiser2002