 of situations: a unique solution, multiple solutions and no solution. For the case of multiple solutions, there are multiple choices for the optimal schedule. All these configurations are identical in the sense that they give the same GW detection significance. The case of no solution can only arise when constraints for some telescopes cannot be met, i.e.some of the pulsars need more time than the telescopes can give, while some of the pulsars have more telescope time than should be assigned. Take the case with two telescopes and two pulsars as an example, where the gain of the two telescopes are the same, two pulsars have identical $\sigma_{0}$, and ${ {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}=\left[\begin{array}{c c}1& 1 \\0&
 1\end{array}\right]$, i.e.only the second telescope can observe the second pulsar. Since the two pulsars have the same $\sigma_{0}$, the total effective telescope time should then also be the same for the optimal schedule (i.e.$\,^{1} \tau_{\rm e}= \,^{2} \tau_{\rm
 e}$). However if the first telescope does not have enough time, one gets $\,^{1} \tau_{\rm e}< \,^{2} \tau_{\rm e}$ and the global optimal schedule is not achievable for such configurations.

The case for which there no solution to [equation (\[eq:taueff\])]{}, is due to an improper choice of telescopes. Most of the time the matrix $\rm \bf O$ is determined by the sky coverage of the telescopes. Thus, if no solution can be found, one needs to seek telescopes with the appropriate sky coverage or extend the time for telescopes with the sky coverage. In order to identify such a no-solution situation we show in [Appendix \[app:exist\]]{} that a solution to [equation (\[eq:taueff\])]{} exists, if the following conditions are satisfied $$\begin{aligned}
 { {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}\tau_{\rm e}\le
 \sum_{\nu=1}^{N_{\rm tel}} { {\cal G}}^2 \tau_{\nu} { {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}\,, \textrm{
 for any index of pulsar }i.
 \label{eq:existsol}\end{aligned}$$ One can identify which pulsar in [equation (\[
of situations: a unique solution, multiple solutions and no solution. For the case of multiple solution, there be multiple choices for the optimal schedule. All these shape are identical in the sense that they give the like GW detection significance. The case of no solution can merely arise when constraints for some telescope cannot be met, i.e.some of the pulsars need more time than the telescope can give, while some of the pulsars get more telescope time than should be assigned. learn the case with two telescopes and two pulsar as an example, where the gain of the two telescope are the same, two pulsar have identical $ \sigma_{0}$, and $ { { \,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}=\left[\begin{array}{c c}1 & 1 \\0 & 
  1\end{array}\right]$, i.e.only the second telescope can observe the second pulsar. Since the two pulsars have the same $ \sigma_{0}$, the total effective telescope time should then besides be the same for the optimal schedule (i.e.$\,^{1 } \tau_{\rm e}= \,^{2 } \tau_{\rm 
  e}$). However if the first telescope does not have enough meter, one gets $ \,^{1 } \tau_{\rm e } < \,^{2 } \tau_{\rm e}$ and the global optimal schedule is not achievable for such configurations. 

 The case for which there no solution to [ equation   (\[eq: taueff\ ]) ] { }, is due to an improper choice of telescope. Most of the clock time the matrix $ \rm \bf O$ is determined by the sky coverage of the telescope. therefore, if no solution can be found, one needs to seek telescopes with the appropriate sky coverage or prolong the time for telescopes with the sky coverage. In order to identify such a no - solution site we show in [ Appendix   \[app: exist\ ] ] { } that a solution to [ equation   (\[eq: taueff\ ]) ] { } exists, if the following conditions are satisfied $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  { { \,^{i}\negthinspace}}\tau_{\rm e}\le 
  \sum_{\nu=1}^{N_{\rm tel } } { { \cal G}}^2 \tau_{\nu } { { \,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}\, , \textrm { 
  for any exponent of pulsar } i. 
  \label{eq: existsol}\end{aligned}$$ One can identify which pulsar in [ equation   (\ [
 of situations: a unique solmtion, multiple solutionv and ho solutkon. For the case of multiple silutiins, there are multiple choices vor the iptinql schedulx. All thcfe ckkfiguxavions are identlcal in the sense that thay gnve the same GW detection significanse. The vade of no solutyon bag onmj crise when constraints for some telescmpes cannot br met, i.e.some of the pulsard nefd more time than hhe telescokss sqn give, whild some of uhz pulsars hzve more telescope time than shuuld ye assigned. Tqke jhe case witi two nelescopes and two punsars ax an example, wmere vhe tain of the two telesropes are the same, tro pulsarv kave identical $\sigma_{0}$, qne ${ {\,^{i}\nggthitspazw}}O_{\nj}=\lert[\uegjn{arraj}{c r}1& 1 \\0&
 1\end{arrag}\right]$, i.e.onoy the second telesvo[v can observe the sqcjnd pulsar. Since the two pulsars have tve aame $\sigma_{0}$, the total efdective telescope timg should tren also be the same for the optimal schedule (i.e.$\,^{1} \dau_{\rm d}= \,^{2} \uam_{\vm
 e}$). Yoaever if the first telescope does not have enjhgn nime, one gets $\,^{1} \tam_{\rm e}< \,^{2} \tau_{\rm e}$ and tje dlobal optimau schebhls is not achievablf for soch cobfiguratijns.

Tne case for which there no wolution to [vquarion (\[eq:taueff\])]{}, is duz to an impruper choive of telescopes. Most oy the fime the mahrix $\rm \br O$ is determined by tve sky coverage of the telqscopes. Tius, iy no soljtiom can fe found, oje necgs to seek telescooes wnth tve approprlate sky coverage or extend the time for telexcmpev with tke sky coverage. In jrder to identnfy such a no-rolution sptuation xe show in [A[pendix \[app:exivj\]]{} that a soluvion to [ezuatuon (\[ew:taueff\])]{} dxists, if the gollowing conditionw are satisfied $$\benin{alkfned}
 { {\,^{i}\negthins'cct}}\tqu_{\rm e}\le
 \sum_{\nu=1}^{M_{\rm tej}} { {\cel G}}^2 \edu_{\nu} { {\,^{i}\negthhnspxce}}U_{\mu}\,, \tebtrm{
 for ann ivdex of pulsar }i.
 \label{eq:axisfsol}\end{aligned}$$ One cwn identufy whicr pulsar in [eauation (\[
of situations: a unique solution, multiple solutions solution. the case multiple solutions, there optimal All these configurations identical in the that they give the same GW significance. The case of no solution can only arise when constraints for some cannot be met, i.e.some of the pulsars need more time than the telescopes give, some the have more telescope time than should be assigned. Take the case with two telescopes and two as an example, where the gain of the telescopes are the same, pulsars have identical $\sigma_{0}$, and {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}=\left[\begin{array}{c 1 \\0& i.e.only second can observe the pulsar. Since the two pulsars have the same $\sigma_{0}$, the total effective telescope time should then also the same optimal schedule \tau_{\rm \,^{2} e}$). However if telescope does not have enough time, \tau_{\rm e}< \,^{2} \tau_{\rm e}$ and the global schedule is achievable for such configurations. The case which there no solution to [equation (\[eq:taueff\])]{}, is to an improper choice of telescopes. Most of the time the matrix $\rm \bf O$ by the sky coverage the telescopes. Thus, no can found, needs to telescopes with the appropriate sky coverage or extend the time for with the sky coverage. In order to identify such a we in [Appendix \[app:exist\]]{} a solution to [equation exists, the following conditions are { e}\le {\cal \tau_{\nu} {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}\,, \textrm{ for any of pulsar }i. \label{eq:existsol}\end{aligned}$$ One identify which pulsar in
 of situations: a unique solutiOn, multiple SolutIonS anD nO solUtioN. For the case of mULtipLe solutions, there are mulTiple ChOIces FOr The opTimal scHEdULE. AlL tHeSe cOnFIgUratiOns Are idenTical in the SenSe That they give THe Same GW deteCtiOn significanCe. THe case Of No sOLutioN caN only Arise wHEn consTraints foR sOMe teleSCopes caNNOt Be meT, i.e.some of the pulsaRS nEEd more time than The telEsCOpES Can GivE, while some Of The puLSars havE MoRE TEleSCope time than sHould be assiGNed. take thE cAse WIth two TelesCoPEs aNd two pulsarS as aN example, wHere thE Gain of tHE two telEscopeS arE thE samE, TwO pUlsArS HavE IdEntICal $\Sigma_{0}$, and ${ {\,^{I}\nEgThinsPace}}o_{\NU}=\LEft[\bEgiN{arrAy}{c c}1& 1 \\0&
 1\eNd{array}\right]$, i.E.onLy thE SecOnd teLescoPe caN oBservE the seCond pUlSar. Since the two pUlsaRs have the SamE $\sIgmA_{0}$, tHe totAL effecTivE teLescope Time shoULd tHeN ALSo Be the same for the optImAL ScHedule (i.e.$\,^{1} \Tau_{\rm e}= \,^{2} \TAu_{\Rm
 E}$). however iF tHe fIrst TELescoPe doES nOt have enOugh tiME, oNe Gets $\,^{1} \tau_{\Rm E}< \,^{2} \tau_{\rm E}$ aNd tHe gLobal OPtimAl scheDule is noT achiEVable for such coNFigurations.

ThE CaSE FoR WhicH thEre no solutiOn to [EQuatIon (\[eQ:TaUefF\])]{}, Is due To an iMpROpER choice of telescopes. moSt of thE time The matrix $\rm \bf o$ is determiNED By the sky CoveRAgE Of the telescopeS. Thus, If no solutiON can be foUnd, onE needs to Seek telesCOPes with tHe aPprOprIatE SKy Coverage or extEND the TiMe for teLesCopes wiTh tHe sKy cOveRaGe. In order To identiFy SuCh A nO-soLutioN SituatioN wE shOw In [APpendIX \[app:exIst\]]{} thAt a sOlUtIOn tO [equatiON (\[eQ:TAuefF\])]{} eXiSts, iF thE fOllowIng cONdiTions arE satisfieD $$\beGIn{alIgNeD}
 { {\,^{i}\negthInspace}}\tau_{\rm e}\Le
 \Sum_{\nu=1}^{N_{\rm teL}} { {\cAl G}}^2 \Tau_{\nu} { {\,^{i}\NEGthinspaCe}}O_{\nu}\,, \textrm{
 for any index oF Pulsar }i.
 \LabEl{eq:eXistSol}\end{aliGneD}$$ One caN idENtify wHich puLsar iN [eQuaTIOn (\[
 of situations: a unique s olution, m ultip lesol ut ions  and  no solution.F or t he case of multiple so lutio ns ,  the r eare m ultiple ch o i ces  f or  th eo pt imalsch edule.All thesecon fi gurations ar e  i dentical i n t he sense tha t t hey gi ve  th e  same  GW  dete ctions ignifi cance. Th ec ase of no solu t i on  can  only arise whenc on s traints for so me tel es c op e s  ca nno t be met,i. e.som e  of the pu l s a rsn eed more time  than the t e les copesca n g i ve, wh ile s om e  of  the pulsar s ha ve more t elesco p e timet han sho uld be  as sig ned. Ta ke  th ec ase wi tht wotelescop es  a nd tw o pu l s a r s as  an  exa mple,  where the ga inof t h e t wo te lesco pesar e the  same,  twopu lsars have iden tica l $\sigma _{0 }$ , a nd  ${ { \ ,^{i}\ neg thi nspace} }O_{\nu } =\l ef t [ \ be gin{array}{c c}1&1\ \ 0& 
 1\end{ array} \ ri gh t ]$, i.e. on lythes e condtele s co pe can o bserve th esecondpu lsar.Si nce  th e two puls ars ha ve the s ame $ \ sigma_{0}$, th e  total effect i ve t el e scop e t ime shouldthen also  bet he  sa m e for  theop t im a l schedule (i.e.$\, ^{ 1} \ta u_{\r m e}= \,^{2}\tau_{\rme } $). Howe veri ft he first teles copedoes not h a ve enoug h tim e, one g ets $\,^{ 1 }  \tau_{\ rme}<  \, ^{2 } \t au_{\rm e}$ a n d  the  g lobal o pti mal sch edu leisnot  a chievable  for suc hco nf ig ura tions . 

The ca se  fo rwhi ch th e re nosolut ionto  [ e qua tion (\ [ eq : t auef f\ ]) ]{},  is  d ue to  ani mpr oper ch oice of t ele s cope s.  M ost ofthe time thema trix $\rm\b f O $ is d e t erminedby the sky coverage oft he tele sco pes.Thus , if no s olu tion c anb e foun d, one  need stos e ek te l e sc ope swith the a p p rop riate  s ky c overage  or extend the tim e  fo r telescopeswit h th e sk y c o ve r age .I n o r d er to identifysuch a no- so l ut ion situat i onwe  show i n [Appe ndix\ [app:ex ist\]]{}that a so lu tion t o [ equation ( \[eq:tau eff\])]{} exist s ,if th e f ollowi ng  co nditi ons ar e  sa tisfi ed $$\ be gin{al igned } { {\,^{ i}\negthinspace}}\tau_{ \rm e} \le
\su m_{\nu=1} ^{N _ {\r m tel}} {  {\c al G}}^2 \ tau _{\ nu} {  {\ , ^{i}\ negt h in spa c e}}O_ {\nu } \,, \text r m{ 
 f o r  a ny index of p u lsa r }i. 
 \ l abel{e q:ex istsol}\end{align e d}$$ One can i dent i f y w hic h  pul sa r in [equation  (\ [
 of_situations: a_unique solution, multiple solutions_and no_solution._For the_case_of multiple solutions,_there are multiple_choices for the optimal_schedule. All these_configurations_are identical in the sense that they give the same GW detection significance. The_case_of no_solution_can_only arise when constraints for_some telescopes cannot be met,_i.e.some of_the pulsars need more time than the telescopes_can_give, while some_of the pulsars have more telescope time than should_be assigned. Take the case with_two telescopes and_two_pulsars_as an example, where_the gain of the two telescopes_are the same, two pulsars have_identical $\sigma_{0}$, and ${ {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}=\left[\begin{array}{c c}1& 1_\\0&
 1\end{array}\right]$, i.e.only the second telescope_can observe the second pulsar._Since the_two pulsars have the same_$\sigma_{0}$, the total_effective telescope_time should then_also be the same for the_optimal schedule (i.e.$\,^{1}_\tau_{\rm e}= \,^{2} \tau_{\rm
 e}$). However_if_the first telescope_does_not_have enough_time, one gets_$\,^{1}_\tau_{\rm e}<_\,^{2}_\tau_{\rm e}$ and the global optimal_schedule_is not achievable for such configurations.

The case_for which there no_solution_to [equation (\[eq:taueff\])]{}, is due_to an improper choice of_telescopes. Most of the time the_matrix $\rm_\bf O$_is determined by the sky coverage of the telescopes. Thus, if_no solution can be found, one_needs to seek telescopes_with the_appropriate_sky coverage or_extend_the time_for telescopes with the sky coverage. In_order to_identify such a no-solution situation we_show in [Appendix \[app:exist\]]{} that_a_solution to [equation (\[eq:taueff\])]{} exists, if the_following conditions are satisfied $$\begin{aligned}
 {_{\,^{i}\negthinspace}}\tau_{\rm e}\le
 \sum_{\nu=1}^{N_{\rm tel}} {_{\cal_G}}^2_\tau_{\nu} { {\,^{i}\negthinspace}}O_{\nu}\,, \textrm{
 for_any index of pulsar }i.
 \label{eq:existsol}\end{aligned}$$_One can identify_which pulsar in [equation (\[