 such that this projection onto the fiber centerline is unique; i.e. the notion of “fiber cross section" is well-defined. We define the slender body PDE for rigid motion as follows: $$\label{SB_PDE}
\begin{aligned}
-\Delta {\bm{u}}^{\rm p} +\nabla p^{\rm p} &=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon  \\
 {{\rm{div}\,}}{\bm{u}}^{\rm p} &=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon  \\
{\bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &= {\bm{v}}^{\rm p} + \bm{\omega}^{\rm p}\times {\bm{X}}(s) \qquad \text{on } \Gamma_\epsilon  \\
{\bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &\to 0 \hspace{3.23cm} \text{as }{\left\lvert {\bm{x}}\right\rvert}\to \infty
\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\Gamma_\epsilon} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n} \; {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) \, d\theta \, ds &= \bm{F}, \qquad
\int_{{\mathbb{T}}} {\bm{X}}(s)\times \bigg(\int_0^{2\pi} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n} \, {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) d\theta \bigg) ds = \bm{T}.\end{aligned}$$ Here we have written $dS = {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta)\, d\theta\, ds$, where ${\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon$ is the Jacobian factor on the slender body surface, which we parameterize as a tube about ${\bm{X}}(s)$ using surface angle $\theta$ (see Section \[geometry\] and expression ). We show that for a closed filament, the rigid slender body PDE is in fact close to the classical PDE for rigid motion [@galdi1999steady; @weinberger1972variational] – in particular, the variation in torque over any cross section of the slender body is higher order in $\epsilon$.\
In the case of a flexible filament with a prescribed force density per unit length along the centerline, the
such that this projection onto the fiber centerline is unique; i.e. the notion of “ roughage hybridization section " is well - defined. We define the lissome body PDE for rigid motion as surveil: $ $ \label{SB_PDE } 
 \begin{aligned } 
 -\Delta { \bm{u}}^{\rm p } + \nabla p^{\rm p } & = 0   \hspace{3.27 cm } \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon   \\ 
  { { \rm{div}\,}}{\bm{u}}^{\rm p } & = 0   \hspace{3.27 cm } \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon   \\ 
 { \bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x } }) & = { \bm{v}}^{\rm p } + \bm{\omega}^{\rm p}\times { \bm{X}}(s) \qquad \text{on } \Gamma_\epsilon   \\ 
 { \bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x } }) & \to 0 \hspace{3.23 cm } \text{as } { \left\lvert { \bm{x}}\right\rvert}\to \infty 
 \end{aligned}$$ and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \int_{\Gamma_\epsilon } \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n } \; { \mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) \, d\theta \, ds & = \bm{F }, \qquad 
 \int_{{\mathbb{T } } } { \bm{X}}(s)\times \bigg(\int_0^{2\pi } \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n } \, { \mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) d\theta \bigg) ds = \bm{T}.\end{aligned}$$ Here we have spell $ dS = { \mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta)\, d\theta\, ds$, where $ { \mathcal{J}}_\epsilon$ is the Jacobian factor on the slender soundbox surface, which we parameterize as a tube approximately $ { \bm{X}}(s)$ using surface slant $ \theta$ (see Section \[geometry\ ] and formula). We prove that for a closed filament, the rigid lissome body PDE is in fact close to the authoritative PDE for rigid movement [ @galdi1999steady; @weinberger1972variational ] – in particular, the pas seul in torque over any cross section of the lissome body is higher order in $ \epsilon$.\ 
 In the case of a flexible filament with a order military unit density per unit length along the centerline, the
 sufh that this projection unto the fiber ewnterlmne is hnique; i.d. the notion of “fiber cross dextion" is well-defined. We defkne the spender bidy KDE for rigid motmkn as follows: $$\paben{WB_PDE}
\begin{aligked}
-\Delta {\bm{g}}^{\rm p} +\nabla p^{\rk o} &=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon  \\
 {{\ri{div}\,}}{\bm{u}}^{\tm p} &=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \jext{im } \Omsga_\epsilon  \\
{\bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &= {\bm{v}}^{\rm p} + \bj{\omega}^{\rk p}\times {\bm{X}}(s) \qquad \text{on } \Gamma_\epsiloj  \\
{\bl{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &\to 0 \hspafe{3.23cm} \text{as }{\lefe\overt {\bm{x}}\rigft\rvert}\to \pufty
\end{alighed}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\Gamma_\epsklon} \ym{\sigma}^{\rm p}\vm{b} \; {\ldthcal{J}}_\epsioon(s,\treta) \, d\theta \, ds &= \bm{X}, \qquad
\ont_{{\mathbb{T}}} {\bm{X}}(x)\tikes \bigg(\int_0^{2\pi} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm '}\bm{n} \, {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilog(s,\theta) d\dhzta \bigg) ds = \bm{T}.\end{alugbed}$$ Hgre wa haxw wfituen $dA = {\matjcam{J}}_\epsilon(s,\fheta)\, d\thetq\, ds$, where ${\mathcal{J}}_\tpsyoon$ is the Jadobian fwctor on the slender body surface, which we parameterize as a tube about ${\bm{X}}(s)$ using survace anglq $\theta$ (see Section \[geometry\] and expression ). We svow tiag fir x cposed filament, the rigid slender body PDE is yh gabt close to the cjassical PDR vot rigid motion [@galdi1999stezdy; @weinberger1972variwtional] – in particulaw, thr variation in torque over qny cross sebtiob of the slender bldy is highzr ordgr in $\rpsilon$.\
In the case of a flesible filamfnt with z prescribed forcd dvnsidy per unit length along tre centeroine, the
such that this projection onto the fiber unique; the notion “fiber cross section" slender PDE for rigid as follows: $$\label{SB_PDE} -\Delta {\bm{u}}^{\rm p} +\nabla p^{\rm p} \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon \\ {{\rm{div}\,}}{\bm{u}}^{\rm p} &=0 \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in } \Omega_\epsilon \\ p}({\bm{x}}) &= {\bm{v}}^{\rm p} + \bm{\omega}^{\rm p}\times {\bm{X}}(s) \qquad \text{on } \Gamma_\epsilon \\ p}({\bm{x}}) 0 \text{as {\bm{x}}\right\rvert}\to \infty \end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned} \int_{\Gamma_\epsilon} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n} \; {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) \, d\theta \, ds &= \bm{F}, \int_{{\mathbb{T}}} {\bm{X}}(s)\times \bigg(\int_0^{2\pi} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n} \, {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) d\theta ds = \bm{T}.\end{aligned}$$ Here have written $dS = {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta)\, ds$, ${\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon$ is Jacobian on slender body surface, we parameterize as a tube about ${\bm{X}}(s)$ using surface angle $\theta$ (see Section \[geometry\] and expression ). show that closed filament, rigid body is in fact the classical PDE for rigid motion in particular, the variation in torque over any section of slender body is higher order in In the case of a flexible filament with prescribed force density per unit length along the centerline, the
 such that this projection ontO the fiber cEnterLinE is UnIque; I.e. thE notion of “fiber CRoss Section" is well-defined. We DefinE tHE sleNDeR body pDE for rIGiD MOtiOn As FolLoWS: $$\lAbel{Sb_PDe}
\begin{aLigned}
-\DeltA {\bm{U}}^{\rM p} +\nabla p^{\rm p} &=0  \hSPaCe{3.27cm} \text{in } \omeGa_\epsilon  \\
 {{\rm{dIv}\,}}{\bM{u}}^{\rm p} &=0  \hSpAce{3.27CM} \text{In } \OMega_\ePsilon  \\
{\BM{u}}^{\rm p}({\bM{x}}) &= {\bm{v}}^{\rm p} + \bM{\oMEga}^{\rm p}\TImes {\bm{X}}(S) \QQuAd \teXt{on } \Gamma_\epsilon  \\
{\bM{U}}^{\rM P}({\bm{x}}) &\to 0 \hspace{3.23cm} \Text{as }{\LeFT\lVERt {\bM{x}}\rIght\rvert}\tO \iNfty
\eND{aligneD}$$ AnD $$\BEGin{ALigned}
\int_{\GammA_\epsilon} \bm{\sIGma}^{\Rm p}\bm{n} \; {\MaThcAL{J}}_\epsiLon(s,\tHeTA) \, d\tHeta \, ds &= \bm{F}, \qqUad
\iNt_{{\mathbb{T}}} {\Bm{X}}(s)\tiMEs \bigg(\iNT_0^{2\pi} \bm{\siGma}^{\rm p}\Bm{n} \, {\MatHcal{j}}_\EpSiLon(S,\tHEta) D\ThEta \BIgg) Ds = \bm{T}.\end{AlIgNed}$$ HeRe we HAVE WritTen $DS = {\maThcal{j}}_\epsilon(s,\thetA)\, d\tHeta\, DS$, whEre ${\maThcal{j}}_\epsIlOn$ is tHe JacoBian fAcTor on the slender Body Surface, whIch We ParAmEteriZE as a tuBe aBouT ${\bm{X}}(s)$ usIng surfACe aNgLE $\THeTa$ (see Section \[geometRy\] AND eXpressioN ). We shoW ThAt FOr a closeD fIlaMent, THE rigiD sleNDeR body PDE Is in faCT cLoSe to the ClAssicaL PdE fOr rIgid mOTion [@Galdi1999sTeady; @weiNbergER1972variational] – in PArticular, the vARiATIoN In toRquE over any croSs seCTion Of thE SlEndER body Is higHeR OrDEr in $\epsilon$.\
In the casE oF a flexIble fIlament with a pRescribed fORCE density Per uNIt LEngth along the cEnterLine, the
 such that this projection  onto thefiber  ce nte rl ineis u nique; i.e. th e  not ion of “fiber cross se ction "i s we l l- defin ed. Wed ef i n e t he  s len de r  b ody P DEfor rig id motionasfo llows: $$\la b el {SB_PDE}
\ beg in{aligned}-\D elta { \b m{u } }^{\r m p } +\n abla p ^ {\rm p } &=0  \h sp a ce{3.2 7 cm} \te x t {i n }\Omega_\epsilon \ \{{\rm{div}\,}} {\bm{u }} ^ {\ r m  p}  &= 0  \hspace {3 .27cm }  \text{ i n} \ Ome g a_\epsilon  \ \
{\bm{u}}^ { \rm  p}({\ bm {x} } ) &= { \bm{v }} ^ {\r m p} + \bm{ \ome ga}^{\rmp}\tim e s {\bm{ X }}(s) \ qquad\te xt{ on } \G am ma_ \e p sil o n \\ {\b m{u}}^{\ rm  p }({\b m{x} } ) & \to0 \ hspa ce{3. 23cm} \text{a s } {\le f t\l vert{\bm{ x}}\ ri ght\r vert}\ to \i nf ty
\end{aligned }$$and $$\be gin {a lig ne d}
\i n t_{\Ga mma _\e psilon}  \bm{\s i gma }^ { \ r mp}\bm{n} \; {\math ca l { J} }_\epsil on(s,\ t he ta )  \, d\th et a \ , ds & = \bm {F}, \q quad
\in t_{{\m a th bb {T}}} { \b m{X}}( s) \ti mes  \big g (\in t_0^{2 \pi} \bm {\sig m a}^{\rm p}\bm{ n } \, {\mathca l {J } } _\ e psil on( s,\theta) d \the t a \b igg) ds  =\ bm{T} .\end {a l ig n ed}$$ Here we havewr itten$dS =  {\mathcal{J} }_\epsilon ( s , \theta)\ , d\ t he t a\, ds$, where  ${\m athcal{J}} _ \epsilon $ isthe Jaco bian fact o r  on thesle nde r b ody s ur face, which w e para me terizeasa tubeabo ut${\ bm{ X} }(s)$ usi ng surfa ce  a ng le  $\ theta $  (see Se ct ion  \ [ge ometr y \] and  expr essi on  ) .  We  show t h at f or a  c lo sedfil am ent,ther igi d slend er body P DEi s in  f ac t close  to the class ic al PDE for  r igi d moti o n  [@galdi 1999steady; @weinberger 1 972vari ati onal]  – i n particu lar , thevar i ationin tor que o ve r a n y  cros s se cti on  of the sl e n der  body  i s hi gher or der in $\epsilon$. \ 
In  the case ofa f lexi b l efil a me n t w it h  ap r escribed forcedensity pe ru ni t length a l ong  t he cent erline,  the
 such_that this_projection onto the fiber_centerline is_unique;_i.e. the_notion_of “fiber cross_section" is well-defined._We define the slender_body PDE for_rigid_motion as follows: $$\label{SB_PDE}
\begin{aligned}
-\Delta {\bm{u}}^{\rm p} +\nabla p^{\rm p} &=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in }_\Omega_\epsilon_ \\
_{{\rm{div}\,}}{\bm{u}}^{\rm_p}_&=0  \hspace{3.27cm} \text{in }_\Omega_\epsilon  \\
{\bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &=_{\bm{v}}^{\rm p}_+ \bm{\omega}^{\rm p}\times {\bm{X}}(s) \qquad \text{on } \Gamma_\epsilon__\\
{\bm{u}}^{\rm p}({\bm{x}}) &\to_0 \hspace{3.23cm} \text{as }{\left\lvert {\bm{x}}\right\rvert}\to \infty
\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\Gamma_\epsilon} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm_p}\bm{n} \; {\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) \, d\theta \,_ds &= \bm{F},_\qquad
\int_{{\mathbb{T}}}_{\bm{X}}(s)\times_\bigg(\int_0^{2\pi} \bm{\sigma}^{\rm p}\bm{n} \,_{\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta) d\theta \bigg) ds = \bm{T}.\end{aligned}$$_Here we have written $dS =_{\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon(s,\theta)\, d\theta\, ds$, where ${\mathcal{J}}_\epsilon$ is the_Jacobian factor on the slender body_surface, which we parameterize as_a tube_about ${\bm{X}}(s)$ using surface angle_$\theta$ (see Section_\[geometry\] and_expression ). We_show that for a closed filament,_the rigid slender_body PDE is in fact close_to_the classical PDE_for_rigid_motion [@galdi1999steady;_@weinberger1972variational] – in_particular,_the variation_in_torque over any cross section of_the_slender body is higher order in $\epsilon$.\
In_the case of a_flexible_filament with a prescribed_force density per unit length_along the centerline, the