epsilon^{\mu}
\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)} A_a^{\lambda} (x)]~,\end{aligned}$$ where the potential ${\cal A}_{\lambda}$ is replaced by the photon polarization vector $\epsilon_{\lambda}$. Notice here that $\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)}A_a^{\lambda} (x) =
g_A m {\bar \Psi} (x) i \gamma_5 \tau_a \Psi (x)$. The last term in eq.(16) can be neglected because it appears at $O(e^2)$ order. Thus we can express the axial current in the radiative processes in the following realistic form $$\begin{aligned}
 A_a^{\mu} (x)
& = & {\bar \Psi} (x) [ g_A \gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5 +
{  {g_P (q^2)  } \over { m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} \gamma_5
- {  {e g_P ( q^2)  } \over { m_{\mu}}} \epsilon^{\mu} \gamma_5 ]
{\tau_a \over 2} \Psi (x) \\ \nonumber
& & - {  {e g_P (q^2)  } \over { 2 m m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu}
[ {\bar \Psi} (x) \epsilon_{\alpha} \gamma^{\alpha} \gamma_5
{\tau_a \over 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\end{aligned}$$ The fourth term, which corresponds to “Seagull term”, is missing [@Ch97] in the previous calculations [@Fe80; @Be87].

Following the Fearing’s formulation and notation [@Fe80] for the diagrams given in ref. [@Fe80], one can evaluate the relativistic amplitude of RMC on a proton as $$M_{ f i} =
M_a + M_b + M_c + M_d + M_e + \Delta M_e$$ with $$\begin{aligned}
M_a &=& - \epsilon_{\alpha} {\bar u}_n \Gamma^{\delta} ( Q) u_p
             \cdot {\bar u}_{\nu} \gamma_{\delta} ( 1 - \gamma_5)
  { { \mu\!\!\!/ - {k \!\!\!/} + m
epsilon^{\mu } 
 \partial_{\lambda } { } ^{(N) } A_a^{\lambda } (x)]~,\end{aligned}$$ where the potential $ { \cal A}_{\lambda}$ is replaced by the photon polarization vector $ \epsilon_{\lambda}$. Notice here that $ \partial_{\lambda } { } ^{(N)}A_a^{\lambda } (x) = 
 g_A m { \bar \Psi } (x) i \gamma_5 \tau_a \Psi (x)$. The final condition in eq.(16) can be neglected because it appears at $ O(e^2)$ order. therefore we can express the axial current in the radiative process in the following realistic kind $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  A_a^{\mu } (x) 
 & = & { \bar \Psi } (x) [ g_A \gamma^{\mu } \gamma_5 + 
 {   { g_P (q^2)   } \over { m_{\mu } } } q^{\mu } \gamma_5 
 - {   { e g_P (q^2)   } \over { m_{\mu } } } \epsilon^{\mu } \gamma_5 ] 
 { \tau_a \over 2 } \Psi (x) \\ \nonumber 
 & & - {   { e g_P (q^2)   } \over { 2 m m_{\mu } } } q^{\mu } 
 [ { \bar \Psi } (x) \epsilon_{\alpha } \gamma^{\alpha } \gamma_5 
 { \tau_a \over 2 } \Psi (x) ] ~.\end{aligned}$$ The fourth terminus, which corresponds to “ Seagull term ”, is miss [ @Ch97 ] in the previous calculations [ @Fe80; @Be87 ]. 

 Following the Fearing ’s formulation and notation [ @Fe80 ] for the diagrams contribute in ref. [ @Fe80 ], one can evaluate the relativistic amplitude of RMC on a proton as $ $ M _ { f i } = 
 M_a + M_b + M_c + M_d + M_e + \Delta M_e$$ with $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 M_a & = & - \epsilon_{\alpha } { \bar u}_n \Gamma^{\delta } (Q) u_p 
              \cdot { \bar u}_{\nu } \gamma_{\delta } (1 - \gamma_5) 
   { { \mu\!\!\!/ - { k \!\!\!/ } + m
epsllon^{\mu}
\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)} A_a^{\uambda} (x)]~,\end{aliguwd}$$ whece the lotentiau ${\cal A}_{\lambda}$ is replaced by tye phiton polarization vectur $\epsiloj_{\lambda}$. Botire here that $\parvjal_{\lambda} {}^{(N)}A_a^{\mwmbdc} (e) =
g_A m {\bar \Psi} (w) i \gamma_5 \tdu_a \Psi (x)$. The nart term in eq.(16) can be neglected becausq it aplewrs at $O(e^2)$ ordet. Thux we dan express the axial current in tge radietive processes in the following realistif fogm $$\begin{aligned}
 A_a^{\lu} (x)
& = & {\bar \Kai} (v) [ g_A \gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5 +
{  {g_K (x^2)  } \over { j_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} \gamma_5
- {  {e g_P ( q^2)  } \over { m_{\mu}}} \zpsilon^{\mu} \gqmna_5 ]
{\hdu_a \over 2} \Pwi (x) \\ \nonumber
& & - {  {e g_P (q^2)  } \over { 2 m m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu}
[ {\bsr \'si} (z) \epsilon_{\alpha} \gamma^{\anpha} \gamma_5
{\tau_a \ovet 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\etd{cligned}$$ The fourth teem, whicv cosresoindr tk “Xezgull herj”, is missihg [@Ch97] in thw previous calculatoogw [@Fe80; @Be87].

Followjng thq Searing’s formulation and notation [@Fe80] fog ths diagrams given in ref. [@Fe80], one can evaluate jhe relatidistic amplitude of RMC on a proton as $$M_{ f i} =
M_a + K_b + M_r + M_d + I_d + \Felta M_e$$ with $$\begin{aligned}
M_a &=& - \epsilon_{\alpha} {\bwd i}_n \Gamma^{\delta} ( Q) u_p
             \sdot {\bar u}_{\nu} \eamma_{\dzmtz} ( 1 - \gamma_5)
  { { \mu\!\!\!/ - {n \!\!\!/} + m
epsilon^{\mu} \partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)} A_a^{\lambda} (x)]~,\end{aligned}$$ where the A}_{\lambda}$ replaced by photon polarization vector {}^{(N)}A_a^{\lambda} = g_A m \Psi} (x) i \tau_a \Psi (x)$. The last term eq.(16) can be neglected because it appears at $O(e^2)$ order. Thus we can the axial current in the radiative processes in the following realistic form $$\begin{aligned} (x) = {\bar (x) [ g_A \gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5 + { {g_P (q^2) } \over { m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} \gamma_5 - {e g_P ( q^2) } \over { m_{\mu}}} \gamma_5 ] {\tau_a \over \Psi (x) \\ \nonumber & - {e g_P } { m m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} {\bar \Psi} (x) \epsilon_{\alpha} \gamma^{\alpha} \gamma_5 {\tau_a \over 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\end{aligned}$$ The fourth term, which corresponds “Seagull term”, [@Ch97] in previous [@Fe80; Following the Fearing’s notation [@Fe80] for the diagrams given one can evaluate the relativistic amplitude of RMC a proton $$M_{ f i} = M_a + + M_c + M_d + M_e + \Delta with $$\begin{aligned} M_a &=& - \epsilon_{\alpha} {\bar u}_n \Gamma^{\delta} ( Q) u_p \cdot {\bar u}_{\nu} 1 - \gamma_5) { \mu\!\!\!/ - {k +
epsilon^{\mu}
\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)} A_a^{\Lambda} (x)]~,\end{AlignEd}$$ wHerE tHe poTentIal ${\cal A}_{\lambda}$ iS ReplAced by the photon polarizAtion VeCTor $\ePSiLon_{\laMbda}$. NotICe HERe tHaT $\pArtIaL_{\LaMbda} {}^{(N)}a_a^{\lAmbda} (x) =
g_a m {\bar \Psi} (x) i \GamMa_5 \Tau_a \Psi (x)$. The lASt Term in eq.(16) caN be Neglected becAusE it appEaRs aT $o(e^2)$ ordEr. THus we Can expREss the Axial currEnT In the rADiative PROcEsseS in the following reALiSTic form $$\begin{alIgned}
 A_A^{\mU} (X)
& = & {\bAR \psi} (X) [ g_A \Gamma^{\mu} \gamMa_5 +
{  {G_P (q^2)  } \ovER { m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} \GAmMA_5
- {  {E G_P ( q^2)  } \OVer { m_{\mu}}} \epsilon^{\Mu} \gamma_5 ]
{\tau_a \OVer 2} \psi (x) \\ \noNuMbeR
& & - {  {E g_P (q^2)  } \ovEr { 2 m m_{\mU}}} q^{\MU}
[ {\baR \Psi} (x) \epsiloN_{\alpHa} \gamma^{\alPha} \gamMA_5
{\tau_a \ovER 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\enD{alignEd}$$ THe fOurtH TeRm, WhiCh COrrESpOndS To “SEagull teRm”, Is MissiNg [@Ch97] IN THE preVioUs caLculaTions [@Fe80; @Be87].

FollOwiNg thE feaRing’s FormuLatiOn And noTation [@fe80] for ThE diagrams given iN ref. [@fe80], one can eValUaTe tHe RelatIVistic AmpLitUde of RMc on a proTOn aS $$M_{ F I} =
m_A + M_B + M_c + M_d + M_e + \Delta M_e$$ with $$\BeGIN{aLigned}
M_a &=& - \EpsiloN_{\AlPhA} {\Bar u}_n \GamMa^{\DelTa} ( Q) u_P
             \CDot {\baR u}_{\nu} \GAmMa_{\delta} ( 1 - \gAmma_5)
  { { \mu\!\!\!/ - {K \!\!\!/} + M
epsilon^{\mu}
\partial_{\l ambda} {}^ {(N)}  A_ a^{ \l ambd a} ( x)]~,\end{alig n ed}$ $ where the potential${\ca lA }_{\ l am bda}$  is rep l ac e d  by  t he  ph ot o npolar iza tion ve ctor $\eps ilo n_ {\lambda}$.N ot ice here t hat  $\partial_{ \la mbda}{} ^{( N )}A_a ^{\ lambd a} (x) =
g_Am {\bar \ Ps i } (x)i  \gamma _ 5  \ tau_ a \Psi (x)$. Thel as t  term in eq.(1 6) can  b e  n e g lec ted  because i tappea r s at $O ( e^ 2 ) $  or d er. Thus we c an expresst heaxialcu rre n t in t he ra di a tiv e processes  inthe follo wing r e alistic form $$ \begin {al ign ed}A_ a^ {\m u} (x) &= & {\b ar \Psi}  ( x)  [ g_ A \g a m m a ^{\m u}\gam ma_5+
{  {g_P (q^ 2) } \ o ver  { m_ {\mu} }} q ^{ \mu}\gamma _5
-{ {e g_P ( q^2) } \ over { m_ {\m u} }}\e psilo n ^{\mu}  \g amm a_5 ]
{ \tau_a\ ove r2 } \P si (x) \\ \nonumbe r& &- {  {eg_P (q ^ 2)  }  \over {  2  mm_{\ m u }}} q ^{\m u }[ {\bar\Psi}( x)  \ epsilon _{ \alpha }\ga mma ^{\al p ha}\gamma _5
{\tau _a \o v er 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\end{align e d} $ $  T h e fo urt h term, whi ch c o rres pond s  t o “ S eagul l ter m” ,  i s  missing [@Ch97] in  t he pre vious  calculations  [@Fe80; @ B e 8 7].

Fol lowi n gt he Fearing’s f ormul ation andn otation[@Fe8 0] for t he diagra m s  given i n r ef.  [@ Fe8 0 ] ,one can evalu a t e th erelativ ist ic ampl itu deofRMC  o n a proto n as $$M _{  f  i }=
M _a +M _b + M_c  +  M_ d+ M _e +\ DeltaM_e$$  wit h$$ \ beg in{alig n ed } M_a&= &- \e psi lo n_{\a lpha }  {\ bar u}_ n \Gamma^ {\d e lta}  (  Q ) u_p
            \ cd ot {\bar u }_ {\n u} \ga m m a_{\delt a} ( 1 - \gamma_5)
  {{  \mu\!\ !\! / - { k \! \!\!/} +m
epsilon^{\mu}
\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)}_A_a^{\lambda} (x)]~,\end{aligned}$$_where the potential ${\cal_A}_{\lambda}$ is_replaced_by the_photon_polarization vector $\epsilon_{\lambda}$._Notice here that_$\partial_{\lambda} {}^{(N)}A_a^{\lambda} (x) =
g_A_m {\bar \Psi}_(x)_i \gamma_5 \tau_a \Psi (x)$. The last term in eq.(16) can be neglected because_it_appears at_$O(e^2)$_order._Thus we can express the_axial current in the radiative_processes in_the following realistic form $$\begin{aligned}
 A_a^{\mu} (x)
& =_&_{\bar \Psi} (x)_[ g_A \gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5 +
{  {g_P (q^2) _} \over { m_{\mu}}} q^{\mu} \gamma_5
-_{  {e_g_P_(_q^2)  } \over_{ m_{\mu}}} \epsilon^{\mu} \gamma_5 ]
{\tau_a \over_2} \Psi (x) \\ \nonumber
& &_- {  {e g_P (q^2) _} \over { 2 m m_{\mu}}}_q^{\mu}
[ {\bar \Psi} (x) \epsilon_{\alpha}_\gamma^{\alpha} \gamma_5
{\tau_a_\over 2} \Psi (x) ]~.\end{aligned}$$_The fourth term,_which corresponds_to “Seagull term”,_is missing [@Ch97] in the previous_calculations [@Fe80; @Be87].

Following_the Fearing’s formulation and notation [@Fe80]_for_the diagrams given_in_ref._[@Fe80], one_can evaluate the_relativistic_amplitude of_RMC_on a proton as $$M_{ f_i}_=
M_a + M_b + M_c + M_d_+ M_e + \Delta_M_e$$_with $$\begin{aligned}
M_a &=& -_\epsilon_{\alpha} {\bar u}_n \Gamma^{\delta} (_Q) u_p
    _ _ _    \cdot {\bar u}_{\nu} \gamma_{\delta} ( 1 -_\gamma_5)
  { { \mu\!\!\!/ -_{k \!\!\!/} + m