 thus scales as the ratio of $B$ at the sonic point to its value at the photosphere. The latter ratio of field strengths is proportional to $1/f$, where $f$ is the superradial expansion factor as defined by Wang and Sheeley. For equal wave fluxes at the photosphere for all regions, coronal holes (with low $f$) will thus have a larger flux of Alfvén waves at and above the sonic point compared to streamers (that have high $f$). In other words, for streamers, more of the energy flux will have been deposited [*below*]{} the sonic point. It is worthwhile to recall that the response of the solar wind plasma to extended acceleration and heating depends on whether the energy is deposited in the subsonic or supersonic wind (Leer and Holzer 1980; Pneuman 1980). Adding energy in the subsonic, i.e., nearly hydrostatic, corona raises the density scale height and decreases the asymptotic outflow speed. Adding energy above the sonic point results mainly in a larger outflow speed because the “supply” of material through the sonic point has already been set. This dichotomy seems to agree with the observed differences between coronal holes and streamers.

(For other simulations showing how the wind speed depends on the flux tube divergence, see Chen and Hu 2002; Vásquez et al.  2003. For a recent summary of low-frequency Alfvén wave propagation, reflection, and damping from the photosphere to the interplanetary medium, see Cranmer and van Ballegooijen 2004.)

Space Weather and CMEs
----------------------

In addition to the relatively time-steady solar wind, the Sun exhibits periodic eruptions of plasma and magnetic energy in the forms of flares, eruptive prominences, and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). These “space weather” events have the potential to interrupt satellite communications, disrupt ground-based power grids, and threaten the safety of orbiting astronauts (see, e.g., Feynman and Gabriel 2000; Song et al.  2001).

[*SOHO*]{} observations of CMEs have demonstrated this mission’s capability to combine high resolution imaging with sensitive spectral measurements to obtain the morphology, evolution, and plasma parameters of the ejected material. As the rate of CME events increased from solar minimum to solar maximum, many unprecedented observations were obtained. Specifically, EIT, SUMER, and CDS
thus scales as the ratio of $ B$ at the sonic point to its value at the photosphere. The latter proportion of sphere strengths is proportional to $ 1 / f$, where $ f$ is the superradial expansion factor as define by Wang and Sheeley. For adequate wave fluxes at the photosphere for all regions, coronal holes (with gloomy $ f$) will thus have a bigger flux of Alfvén waves at and above the sonic compass point compared to streamers (that have gamey $ f$). In early words, for streamers, more of the department of energy flux will have been situate [ * below * ] { } the sonic detail. It is worthwhile to recall that the response of the solar wind plasma to extensive acceleration and heating depends on whether the energy is lodge in the subsonic or supersonic wind (Leer and Holzer 1980; Pneuman 1980). Adding energy in the subsonic, i.e., nearly hydrostatic, corona raises the concentration scale height and decreases the asymptotic outflow speed. Adding department of energy above the sonic detail results mainly in a larger outflow speed because the “ supply ” of material through the sonic point has already been set. This dichotomy look to agree with the observed dispute between coronal trap and streamers. 

 (For other model showing how the wind speed depends on the magnetic field tube divergence, see Chen and Hu 2002; Vásquez et al.    2003. For a recent summary of low - frequency Alfvén wave propagation, expression, and damping from the photosphere to the interplanetary medium, see Cranmer and van Ballegooijen 2004 .) 

 Space Weather and CMEs 
 ---------------------- 

 In addition to the relatively meter - steady solar tip, the Sun exhibits periodic eruptions of plasma and magnetic energy in the forms of flare, eruptive prominences, and coronal mass expulsion (CMEs). These “ space weather ” events have the potential to interrupt satellite communication, disrupt ground - based ability grids, and endanger the safety of orbiting astronauts (see, for example, Feynman and Gabriel 2000; Song et al.    2001). 

 [ * SOHO * ] { } observations of CMEs have demonstrated this mission ’s capability to aggregate high solution imaging with sensitive spectral measurements to obtain the morphology, evolution, and plasma parameters of the ejected material. As the pace of CME events increased from solar minimum to solar maximal, many unprecedented observations were obtained. Specifically, EIT, SUMER, and CDS
 thks scales as the ratio on $B$ at the sonic point vo its balue at the photosphere. The latter catii of dield strengths is prooortional to $1/f$, whwre $h$ is the superravjal expansion nactox es defined by Wsng and Shaeley. For equan dare fluxes at the photosphere for all regionx, foronal holes (rith jow $r$) will thus have a larger flux of Zlfvén weves at and abofe the sonic point comparef to streamers (that hage high $f$). Ib otrwr words, for streamers, more of the energy flux will have been depusiteb [*below*]{} the sinif point. It iw wornhwhile to regsll thdt the tesponse of thc soler wund plasma to extendev acceleration and hgating depanbs on whether the eneegt is gepovitea in tht snbsknic og snpersonic wjnd (Leer ane Holzer 1980; Pneuman 1980). Sdqpmg energy in the stbfonic, i.e., nearly hydrostatic, corona raists ths density scale height qnd decreases the asylptotic ottflow speed. Adding energy above the sonic point sesulvs mankjh ij a larger outflow speed because the “supply” os mstvrial through the sonic poiny jax already been set. Tkjs dichotomy seems tl agree with the obsewved differences between coronao holes and frreamers.

(For other dimulations shoeing now the wind speed depeuds on the flux tkbe diverfdnce, see Chen ana Hl 2002; Vávquez et al.  2003. For a recent fummary oh low-yrequench Algvén wade propagahion, vaflection, and damplng ftom tha photosphfre to the interplanetary medium, see Cranmer sng vdn Balleyooijek 2004.)

Space Weather and CMEs
----------------------

In adbition tj the relativelj time-steedy solar wigd, the Sun exvlbits periodmc eruptijns if poasma ava magnetic enetgy in thv yorms of dlares, eruptive prpmivsnces, and coroncu mass ejections (CMDs). Ehvse “s[dce weather” avengs fsve tfe potentiao to onterrupt satellite wommhnications, disrupt gvound-basee power drids, and thrraten the safety ov orbmting estronsutf (see, e.g., Feynman and Gabriel 2000; Aong et ap.  2001).

[*SJHO*]{} observatyons of CMEs havz demonstrated this mission’s capability vo combine high resolujion imaging with senxltive spectrel meafurements to obtain the morphilogy, evolution, akd plasma parameters or the ajectfd material. As the rate of CME events increased from solar minimum to solqr maxmmtm, many unpdececenteg jyservatyons xere obtained. Spebifically, EIT, SUMER, and CDS
thus scales as the ratio of $B$ sonic to its at the photosphere. strengths proportional to $1/f$, $f$ is the expansion factor as defined by Wang Sheeley. For equal wave fluxes at the photosphere for all regions, coronal holes low $f$) will thus have a larger flux of Alfvén waves at and the point to (that have high $f$). In other words, for streamers, more of the energy flux will have deposited [*below*]{} the sonic point. It is worthwhile recall that the response the solar wind plasma to acceleration heating depends whether energy deposited in the or supersonic wind (Leer and Holzer 1980; Pneuman 1980). Adding energy in the subsonic, i.e., nearly hydrostatic, raises the height and the outflow Adding energy above point results mainly in a larger the “supply” of material through the sonic point already been This dichotomy seems to agree with observed differences between coronal holes and streamers. (For simulations showing how the wind speed depends on the flux tube divergence, see Chen and Vásquez et al. 2003. a recent summary low-frequency wave reflection, damping from photosphere to the interplanetary medium, see Cranmer and van Ballegooijen 2004.) Weather and CMEs ---------------------- In addition to the relatively time-steady the exhibits periodic eruptions plasma and magnetic energy the of flares, eruptive prominences, mass (CMEs). events the to interrupt satellite communications, ground-based power grids, and threaten safety of orbiting astronauts 2000; Song et al. 2001). [*SOHO*]{} observations of have demonstrated this mission’s capability to combine resolution imaging with sensitive spectral measurements to obtain the morphology, evolution, and parameters of material. As the rate of CME events increased solar minimum to solar many unprecedented observations were obtained. Specifically, EIT, SUMER, and
 thus scales as the ratio of $B$ at The sonic poInt to Its ValUe At thE phoTosphere. The latTEr raTio of field strengths is pRoporTiONal tO $1/F$, wHere $f$ Is the suPErRADiaL eXpAnsIoN FaCtor aS deFined by wang and SheEleY. FOr equal wave fLUxEs at the phoTosPhere for all rEgiOns, corOnAl hOLes (wiTh lOw $f$) wiLl thus HAve a laRger flux oF ALFvén waVEs at and ABOvE the Sonic point compareD To STreamers (that haVe high $F$). IN OtHER woRds, For streameRs, More oF The enerGY fLUX WilL Have been deposIted [*below*]{} thE SonIc poinT. IT is WOrthwhIle to ReCAll That the respOnse Of the solaR wind pLAsma to eXTended aCcelerAtiOn aNd heATiNg DepEnDS on WHeTheR The Energy is DePoSited In thE SUBSoniC or SupeRsoniC wind (Leer and HOlzEr 1980; PnEUmaN 1980). AddiNg eneRgy iN tHe subSonic, i.E., nearLy Hydrostatic, coroNa raIses the deNsiTy ScaLe HeighT And decReaSes The asymPtotic oUTflOw SPEEd. adding energy above tHe SONiC point reSults mAInLy IN a larger OuTflOw spEED becaUse tHE “sUpply” of mAteriaL ThRoUgh the sOnIc poinT hAs aLreAdy beEN set. this diChotomy sEems tO Agree with the obSErved differenCEs BETwEEn coRonAl holes and sTreaMErs.

(FOr otHEr SimULatioNs shoWiNG hOW the wind speed dependS oN the flUx tubE divergence, seE Chen and Hu 2002; vÁSQuez et al.  2003. for a REcENt summary of low-FrequEncy Alfvén WAve propaGatioN, reflectIon, and damPINg from thE phOtoSphEre TO ThE interplanetaRY MediUm, See CranMer And van BAllEgoOijEn 2004.)

SPaCe Weather And CMEs
----------------------

IN aDdItIoN to The reLAtively tImE-stEaDy sOlar wINd, the SUn exhIbitS pErIOdiC eruptiONs OF PlasMa AnD magNetIc EnergY in tHE foRms of flAres, eruptIve PRomiNeNcEs, and coRonal mass ejecTiOns (CMEs). TheSe “SpaCe weatHER” events hAve the potential to interrUPt satelLitE commUnicAtions, disRupT grounD-baSEd poweR grids, And thReAteN THe safETY oF orBiTing astronAUTs (sEe, e.g., FEyNman And GabrIel 2000; Song et al.  2001).

[*SOHO*]{} obsERvaTions of CMEs haVe dEmonSTRaTed THiS MisSiON’s cAPAbility to combinE high resolUtIOn Imaging witH SenSiTive speCtral meAsureMEnts to oBtain the mOrphology, EvOlutION, anD plasma parAmeters oF the ejectED mateRIaL. As thE raTe of CMe eVenTs incReased FRom Solar MinimuM tO solar MaximUm, Many unprEcedented observations weRe obtaIned. SPecIfically, EiT, SumER, And CDS
 thus scales as the ratioof $B$ atthe s oni c p oi nt t o it s value at the phot osphere. The latter ra tio o ff ield st rengt hs is p r op o r tio na lto$1 / f$ , whe re$f$ isthe superr adi al  expansion f a ct or as defi ned  by Wang and  Sh eeley.  F ore qualwav e flu xes at the ph otosphere  f o r allr egions, c or onal  holes (with low$ f$ )  will thus hav e a la rg e rf l uxofAlfvén wav es  at a n d above th e s oni c  point compar ed to strea m ers  (that  h ave high $ f$).In oth er words, f or s treamers,  moreo f the e n ergy fl ux wil l h ave  bee n  d ep osi te d  [* b el ow* ] {}the soni cpo int.It i s w o rthw hil e to  reca ll that the r esp onse ofthe s olarwind  p lasma  to ex tende dacceleration an d he ating dep end sonwh ether the en erg y i s depos ited in the  s u b s on ic or supersonic w in d (L eer andHolzer 19 80 ;  Pneuman  1 980 ). A d d ing e nerg y  i n the su bsonic ,  i .e ., near ly  hydro st ati c,coron a  rai ses th e densit y sca l e height and d e creases the a s ym p t ot i c ou tfl ow speed. A ddin g  ene rgya bo vet he so nic p oi n tr esults mainly in ala rger o utflo w speed becau se the “su p p l y” of ma teri a lt hrough the son ic po int has al r eady bee n set . This d ichotomys e ems to a gre e w ith  th e ob served differ e n cesbe tween c oro nal hol esand  st rea me rs.

(For  other s im ul at io nsshowi n g how th ewin dspe ed de p ends o n the  flu xtu b e d ivergen c e, s ee C he nandHu20 02; V ásqu e z e t al. 2003. For  ar ecen tsu mmary o f low-frequen cy  Alfvén wa ve  pr opagat i o n, refle ction, and damping from the pho tos phere  tothe inter pla netary  me d ium, s ee Cra nmeran d v a n  Ball e g oo ije n2004.)

Sp a c e W eathe randCMEs
-- ------------------ - -
In addition t o t he r e l at ive l yt ime -s t ead y solar wind, the  Sun exhib it s  p eriodic er u pti on s of pl asma an d mag n etic en ergy in t he formsof  fla r e s,eruptive p rominenc es, and c o ronal ma ss ej ect ions ( CM Es) . The se “sp a ceweath er” ev en ts hav e the  p otential  to interrupt satellite  commu nicat ion s, disrup t g r oun d-based p ower  grids, an d t hre atenthe safet y of or bit i ng as tron a uts (see, e. g., F ey nman and Ga b r i el2000;  So n g et a l. 2001).

[*SOHO*]{ }  observationsof C M E s h ave demo ns trated this mi ssi on ’ s  capabil it y to combin e high r es o lutio n imag ing wi th sens i t iv e  spect ralmea surements  to  o b tain th emo r pholog y, e vo lution , andp lasm a parameters of th e eje c t ed ma t eri al. A sthe rat e  ofCME events  increasedfrom s olar  mini mum toso lar ma xim um , many unp r ecedented  obse rvation swere  ob tained . Sp e c ifica lly,  E IT,  SUMER, a n d  C D S
 thus_scales as_the ratio of $B$_at the_sonic_point to_its_value at the_photosphere. The latter_ratio of field strengths_is proportional to_$1/f$,_where $f$ is the superradial expansion factor as defined by Wang and Sheeley. For_equal_wave fluxes_at_the_photosphere for all regions, coronal_holes (with low $f$) will_thus have_a larger flux of Alfvén waves at and_above_the sonic point_compared to streamers (that have high $f$). In other_words, for streamers, more of the_energy flux will_have_been_deposited [*below*]{} the sonic_point. It is worthwhile to recall_that the response of the solar_wind plasma to extended acceleration and heating_depends on whether the energy is_deposited in the subsonic or_supersonic wind_(Leer and Holzer 1980; Pneuman_1980). Adding energy_in the_subsonic, i.e., nearly_hydrostatic, corona raises the density scale_height and decreases_the asymptotic outflow speed. Adding energy_above_the sonic point_results_mainly_in a_larger outflow speed_because_the “supply”_of_material through the sonic point has_already_been set. This dichotomy seems to agree_with the observed differences_between_coronal holes and streamers.

(For_other simulations showing how the_wind speed depends on the flux_tube divergence,_see Chen_and Hu 2002; Vásquez et al.  2003. For a recent summary_of low-frequency Alfvén wave propagation, reflection,_and damping from the_photosphere to_the_interplanetary medium, see_Cranmer_and van_Ballegooijen 2004.)

Space Weather and CMEs
----------------------

In addition to_the relatively_time-steady solar wind, the Sun exhibits_periodic eruptions of plasma_and_magnetic energy in the forms of_flares, eruptive prominences, and coronal mass_ejections (CMEs). These “space weather”_events_have_the potential to interrupt satellite_communications, disrupt ground-based power grids, and_threaten the safety_of orbiting astronauts (see, e.g., Feynman and_Gabriel_2000; Song et al.  2001).

[*SOHO*]{} observations_of_CMEs have demonstrated this mission’s capability_to_combine_high resolution imaging with sensitive_spectral measurements to obtain the morphology,_evolution, and plasma parameters of the ejected material. As_the rate of_CME events increased from solar_minimum_to_solar maximum, many unprecedented observations were obtained. Specifically, EIT, SUMER,_and CDS