 and $v\in C^\perp$. Since $\sigma^m=1$, we have $u\cdot T_{\sigma,l}(v)=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}u_i\cdot \sigma(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(u_i)\cdot v_{i+m-1})=\sigma(T_{\sigma,l}^{m-1}(u)\cdot v)=\sigma(0)=0$, where $i+m-1$ is taken modulo $m$. Hence $T_{\sigma, l}(v)\in C^\perp$, which implies that the dual code of skew QC code $C$ is also a skew QC code of the same index.

We define a conjugation map $^-$ on $R$ such that $\overline{ax^i}=\sigma^{-i}x^{m-i}$, for $ax^i\in R$. On $R^l$, we define the Hermitian inner product of $a(x)=(a_0(x), a_1(x), \ldots, a_{l-1}(x))$ and $b(x)=(b_0(x), b_1(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\in R^l$ by $$\langle a(x), b(x)\rangle=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot \overline{b_i(x)}.$$ By generalizing Proposition 3.2 of [@Ling1], we get

[**Proposition 5.2**]{} *Let $u, v \in \mathbb{F}_q^{lm}$ and $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ be their polynomial representations in $R^l$, respectively. Then $T_{\sigma,l}^k(u)\cdot v=0$ for all $0\leq k \leq m-1$ if and only if $\langle u(x), v(x)\rangle=0$.* $\Box$

Let $C$ be a skew QC code of length $lm$ with index $l$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$. Then, by Theorem 5.1, $$C^\perp=\{v(x)\in R^l\mid \langle c(x), v(x)\rangle=0,~\forall c(x)\in C\}.$$ Furthermore, by
and $ v\in C^\perp$. Since $ \sigma^m=1 $, we have $ u\cdot T_{\sigma, l}(v)=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}u_i\cdot \sigma(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(u_i)\cdot v_{i+m-1})=\sigma(T_{\sigma, l}^{m-1}(u)\cdot v)=\sigma(0)=0 $, where $ i+m-1 $ is taken modulo $ m$. Hence $ T_{\sigma, l}(v)\in C^\perp$, which implies that the double code of skew QC code $ C$ is besides a skew QC code of the same index. 

 We specify a coupling map $ ^-$ on $ R$ such that $ \overline{ax^i}=\sigma^{-i}x^{m - i}$, for $ ax^i\in R$. On $ R^l$, we define the Hermitian inside product of $ a(x)=(a_0(x), a_1(x), \ldots, a_{l-1}(x))$ and $ b(x)=(b_0(x), b_1(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\in R^l$ by $ $ \langle a(x), b(x)\rangle=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot \overline{b_i(x)}.$$ By generalizing Proposition 3.2 of [ @Ling1 ], we get 

 [ * * Proposition 5.2 * * ] { } * permit $ u, v \in \mathbb{F}_q^{lm}$ and $ u(x)$ and $ v(x)$ be their polynomial representations in $ R^l$, respectively. Then $ T_{\sigma, l}^k(u)\cdot v=0 $ for all $ 0\leq k \leq m-1 $ if and entirely if $ \langle u(x), v(x)\rangle=0$. * $ \Box$ 

 Let $ C$ be a skew QC code of length $ lm$ with exponent $ l$ over $ \mathbb{F}_q$. Then, by Theorem 5.1, $ $ C^\perp=\{v(x)\in R^l\mid \langle c(x), v(x)\rangle=0,~\forall c(x)\in C\}.$$ Furthermore, by
 anf $v\in C^\perp$. Since $\sigma^m=1$, we have $u\cdot J_{\sugma,l}(v)=\vum_{i=0}^{m-1}u_j\cdot \siema(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(u_i)\cdot v_{u+m-1})=\signa(T_{\sigma,l}^{m-1}(u)\cdot v)=\sigma(0)=0$, where $i+m-1$ is takeb movulo $m$. Hence $T_{\sijja, l}(v)\in C^\perp$, ahick mmplies that thg dual code mf skew QC coda $Z$ ns also a skew QC code of the same igdex.

We cevine a conjugajion kwp $^-$ kn $R$ such that $\overline{ax^i}=\sigma^{-i}x^{m-j}$, for $aq^i\in R$. On $R^l$, we drfine the Hermitian inner orodkct of $a(x)=(a_0(x), a_1(x), \ldohs, a_{l-1}(x))$ and $v(x)=(b_0(x), v_1(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\kn R^l$ by $$\langle a(x), b(x)\rzngle=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot \overline{b_i(x)}.$$ By genexalizing Pripisihhon 3.2 of [@Linj1], we gvt

[**Proposition 5.2**]{} *Let $u, e \in \mayhbb{F}_q^{lm}$ and $u(w)$ and $v(x)$ be their polynomial cepresentations in $R^j$, respecthvzly. Then $T_{\sigma,l}^k(u)\cdor c=0$ for all $0\leq j \ldq j-1$ mf znd onpy mf $\langle u(s), v(x)\rangle=0$.* $\Vox$

Let $C$ be a skew AC bpde of lengtg $lm$ wytr index $l$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$. Then, by Theorem 5.1, $$C^\lerp=\{v(x)\in R^l\mid \langle c(z), v(x)\rangle=0,~\forall c(x)\in C\}.$$ Furthewmore, by
and $v\in C^\perp$. Since $\sigma^m=1$, we have \sigma(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(u_i)\cdot v)=\sigma(0)=0$, where is taken modulo which that the dual of skew QC $C$ is also a skew QC of the same index. We define a conjugation map $^-$ on $R$ such $\overline{ax^i}=\sigma^{-i}x^{m-i}$, for $ax^i\in R$. On $R^l$, we define the Hermitian inner product of a_1(x), a_{l-1}(x))$ $b(x)=(b_0(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\in R^l$ by $$\langle a(x), b(x)\rangle=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot \overline{b_i(x)}.$$ By generalizing Proposition 3.2 of [@Ling1], we get 5.2**]{} *Let $u, v \in \mathbb{F}_q^{lm}$ and $u(x)$ $v(x)$ be their polynomial in $R^l$, respectively. Then $T_{\sigma,l}^k(u)\cdot for $0\leq k m-1$ and if $\langle u(x), $\Box$ Let $C$ be a skew QC code of length $lm$ with index $l$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$. Then, Theorem 5.1, \langle c(x), c(x)\in Furthermore,
 and $v\in C^\perp$. Since $\sigma^m=1$, we hAve $u\cdot T_{\sIgma,l}(V)=\suM_{i=0}^{m-1}U_i\Cdot \SigmA(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\SIgma^{M-1}(u_i)\cdot v_{i+m-1})=\sigma(T_{\sigma,l}^{M-1}(u)\cdoT v)=\SIgma(0)=0$, WHeRe $i+m-1$ iS taken mODuLO $M$. HeNcE $T_{\SigMa, L}(V)\iN C^\perP$, whIch implIes that the DuaL cOde of skew QC cODe $c$ is also a skEw Qc code of the saMe iNdex.

We DeFinE A conjUgaTion mAp $^-$ on $R$ sUCh that $\Overline{aX^i}=\SIgma^{-i}x^{M-I}$, for $ax^i\IN r$. ON $R^l$, wE define the HermitiAN iNNer product of $a(x)=(A_0(x), a_1(x), \ldOtS, A_{l-1}(X))$ ANd $b(X)=(b_0(x), B_1(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\In r^l$ by $$\lANgle a(x), b(X)\RaNGLE=\suM_{I=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot \overlIne{b_i(x)}.$$ By genERalIzing PRoPosITion 3.2 of [@ling1], wE gET

[**PrOposition 5.2**]{} *LeT $u, v \iN \mathbb{F}_q^{Lm}$ and $u(X)$ And $v(x)$ be THeir polYnomiaL rePreSentATiOnS in $r^l$, REspECtIveLY. ThEn $T_{\sigma,L}^k(U)\cDot v=0$ fOr alL $0\LEQ K \leq M-1$ if And oNly if $\Langle u(x), v(x)\ranGle=0$.* $\box$

LET $C$ bE a skeW QC coDe of LeNgth $lM$ with iNdex $l$ OvEr $\mathbb{F}_q$. Then, bY TheOrem 5.1, $$C^\perp=\{V(x)\iN R^L\miD \lAngle C(X), v(x)\ranGle=0,~\ForAll c(x)\in c\}.$$ FurtheRMorE, bY
 and $v\in C^\perp$. Since  $\sigma^m =1$,wehav e$u\c dotT_{\sigma,l}(v ) =\su m_{i=0}^{m-1}u_i\cdot\sigm a( v _{i+ m -1 })=\s um_{i=0 } ^{ m - 1}\ si gm a(\ si g ma ^{m-1 }(u _i)\cdo t v_{i+m-1 })= \s igma(T_{\sig m a, l}^{m-1}(u )\c dot v)=\sigm a(0 )=0$,wh ere $i+m- 1$is ta ken mo d ulo $m $. Hence$T _ {\sigm a , l}(v) \ i nC^\p erp$, which impli e st hat the dual c ode of  s k ew Q C c ode  $C$ is al so  a sk e w QC co d eo f the same index.
We define a con jugati on  ma p  $^-$on $R $s uch  that $\ove rlin e{ax^i}=\ sigma^ { -i}x^{m - i}$, fo r $ax^ i\i n R $. O n  $ R^ l$,  w e  de f in e t h e H ermitian  i nn er pr oduc t o f  $a( x)= (a_0 (x),a_1(x), \ldot s,a_{l - 1}( x))$and $ b(x) =( b_0(x ), b_1 (x),\l dots, b_{l-1}(x ))\i n R^l$ by  $$ \l ang le  a(x) ,  b(x)\ ran gle =\sum_{ i=0}^{l - 1}a (x ) \ c do t \overline{b_i(x) }. $ $  B y genera lizing Pr op o sition 3 .2  of  [@L i n g1],we g e t
[**Prop ositio n  5 .2 **]{} * Le t $u,v\in  \m athbb { F}_q ^{lm}$  and $u( x)$ a n d $v(x)$ be th e ir polynomial re p r es e ntat ion s in $R^l$,  res p ecti vely .  T hen $T_{\ sigma ,l } ^k ( u)\cdot v=0$ for al l$0\leq  k \l eq m-1$ if an d only if$ \ l angle u( x),v (x ) \rangle=0$.* $ \Box$ 

Let $C$b e a skew  QC c ode of l ength $lm $ with ind ex$l$  ov er$ \ ma thbb{F}_q$. T h e n, b yTheorem  5. 1, $$C^ \pe rp= \{v (x) \i n R^l\mid  \langle  c (x ),  v (x) \rang l e=0,~\fo ra llc( x)\ in C\ } .$$ Fu rther more ,by 
 and_$v\in C^\perp$._Since $\sigma^m=1$, we have_$u\cdot T_{\sigma,l}(v)=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}u_i\cdot_\sigma(v_{i+m-1})=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(u_i)\cdot_v_{i+m-1})=\sigma(T_{\sigma,l}^{m-1}(u)\cdot v)=\sigma(0)=0$,_where_$i+m-1$ is taken_modulo $m$. Hence_$T_{\sigma, l}(v)\in C^\perp$, which_implies that the_dual_code of skew QC code $C$ is also a skew QC code of the_same_index.

We define_a_conjugation_map $^-$ on $R$ such_that $\overline{ax^i}=\sigma^{-i}x^{m-i}$, for $ax^i\in R$._On $R^l$,_we define the Hermitian inner product of $a(x)=(a_0(x),_a_1(x),_\ldots, a_{l-1}(x))$ and_$b(x)=(b_0(x), b_1(x), \ldots, b_{l-1}(x))\in R^l$ by $$\langle a(x), b(x)\rangle=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}a(x)\cdot_\overline{b_i(x)}.$$ By generalizing Proposition 3.2 of_[@Ling1], we get

[**Proposition_5.2**]{}_*Let_$u, v \in \mathbb{F}_q^{lm}$_and $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ be their_polynomial representations in $R^l$, respectively. Then_$T_{\sigma,l}^k(u)\cdot v=0$ for all $0\leq k \leq_m-1$ if and only if $\langle_u(x), v(x)\rangle=0$.* $\Box$

Let $C$ be_a skew_QC code of length $lm$_with index $l$_over $\mathbb{F}_q$._Then, by Theorem_5.1, $$C^\perp=\{v(x)\in R^l\mid \langle c(x), v(x)\rangle=0,~\forall_c(x)\in C\}.$$ Furthermore,_by