 in the center-broken deconfined phase is given by the transition point between decreasing part of the potential for small $\varphi$ and the flat region in the middle of the plot. It can also be explicitly computed from. In the center-symmetric confined phase it is just given by the minimum at $\varphi=\pi$.\

![Full effective potential $\hat V_{\rm eff}$, normalised to 0 at $\varphi =0$[]{data-label="fig:Veff"}](VeffforT.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"}\

The temperature-dependence of the order parameter $L[\langle
A_0\rangle ] = \cos(\langle \varphi / 2 \rangle)$ is shown in Fig. \[fig:LofT\], and we observe a second order phase transition from the confined to the deconfined phase at a critical temperature $$\label{eq:Tc}
T_c =
305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, {\rm MeV},\qquad \quad {T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}
=0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ with the string tension $\sqrt{\sigma}=440$ MeV. The corresponding value on the lattice is ${T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}=.709$, [@Fingberg:1992ju], and agrees within the errors with our result. The estimate of the systematic error in is dominated by that of the uncertainty of the identification of $k_{\rm phys}$, see Appendix \[app:match\].

We would also like to comment on the difference of the temperature-dependence of $L[\langle A_0\rangle ]$ depicted in Fig. \[fig:LofT\] and that of the Polyakov loop $\langle
L[A_0]\rangle$. It has been shown in section \[sec:QCDinPol\] that in the confined phase they both vanish and both are non-zero in the deconfined phase. However, the Jensen inequality entails that the present observable $L[\langle A_0\rangle ]$ takes bigger values than the Polyakov loop $\langle L[A_0]\rangle$, which is in agreement with lattice results.

![Temperature dependence of the Polyakov loop $L[\langle A_0\rangle]=\cos(\langle
    \varphi \rangle / 2)$ in $SU(2)$[]{data-label="fig:LofT"}](ptrans.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"
in the center - broken deconfined phase is given by the transition item between decrease part of the potential for small $ \varphi$ and the compressed region in the middle of the plot. It can besides be explicitly computed from. In the center - symmetric confined phase it is merely given by the minimum at $ \varphi=\pi$.\ 

! [ Full effective electric potential $ \hat V_{\rm eff}$, normalised to 0 at $ \varphi = 0$[]{data - label="fig: Veff"}](VeffforT.eps " fig:"){width="8cm"}\ 

 The temperature - dependence of the order parameter $ L[\langle 
 A_0\rangle ] = \cos(\langle \varphi / 2 \rangle)$ is indicate in Fig. \[fig: LofT\ ], and we observe a second order phase transition from the confined to the deconfined phase at a critical temperature $ $ \label{eq: Tc } 
 T_c = 
 305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, { \rm MeV},\qquad \quad { T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma } } 
 = 0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ with the bowed stringed instrument tension $ \sqrt{\sigma}=440 $ MeV. The corresponding value on the lattice is $ { T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}=.709 $, [ @Fingberg:1992ju ], and harmonize within the errors with our result. The estimate of the systematic mistake in is dominated by that of the uncertainty of the identification of $ k_{\rm phys}$, see Appendix   \[app: match\ ]. 

 We would also wish to comment on the difference of the temperature - dependence of $ L[\langle A_0\rangle ] $ depicted in Fig.   \[fig: LofT\ ] and that of the Polyakov loop $ \langle 
 L[A_0]\rangle$. It has been shown in incision   \[sec: QCDinPol\ ] that in the confined phase they both vanish and both are non - zero in the deconfined phase. However, the Jensen inequality entails that the present observable $ L[\langle A_0\rangle ] $ takes bigger values than the Polyakov loop $ \langle L[A_0]\rangle$, which is in agreement with lattice results. 

! [ Temperature addiction of the Polyakov cringle $ L[\langle A_0\rangle]=\cos(\langle 
     \varphi \rangle / 2)$ in $ SU(2)$[]{data - label="fig: LofT"}](ptrans.eps " fig:"){width="8 cm "
 in the center-broken deconflned phase is girwn by vhe trahsition ooint between decreasing parv of the kjtential for small $\varphi$ ajd the foat cegion in the mivsle of bke plkb. It eai also be expligitly compuded from. In tha zeuter-symmetric confined phase it is jtst givrn by the minimui at $\darpgp=\pl$.\

![Full effective potential $\hat V_{\rj eff}$, nmrmalised to 0 at $\varphi =0$[]{data-label="fig:Vefv"}](VefvforT.eps "fig:"){width="8cl"}\

The temperqturq-eependence ow the ordeg parameter $L[\langle
A_0\rangle ] = \cos(\langle \varohi / 2 \rangle)$ is syowj in Fig. \[fig:OofT\], wnd we obseryv a secmnd ordrr phase transltion frim the confined to thx deconfined phase aj a criticdl temperature $$\labeo{ew:Tc}
T_c =
305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, {\rk MeX},\wquxd \sued {F_c}/{\sqrt{\digja}}
=0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ with ths string tebsion $\sqrt{\sigma}=440$ MeV. Trv correspondihg valte on the lattice is ${T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}=.709$, [@Fingberg:1992bu], znd agrees within the eerors with our result. The estiiate of the systematic error in is dominated by tvat oh ghe ukcergqijty of the identification of $k_{\rm phys}$, see Appqhdox \[spp:match\].

We woujd also likr ho somment on thg diffexsnde of the temperatkre-depegdencw of $L[\landle S_0\rangle ]$ depicted in Fig. \[fig:OofT\] and than of the Polyakov loop $\langle
L[A_0]\raugle$. Ij has neen shown in section \[see:QCDinLol\] that in the confjved phase they buth vdnish and both are non-zero in the dxconfnned phare. Hpwever, the Jensej inequality entails thah the psesent obsfrvable $L[\langle A_0\rangle ]$ takes umgger values jhat tve Polyahov lpop $\langle L[A_0]\wangle$, which ix in agxeemeng with latnice resunts.

![Temperattre dependenca of the Polyekov loop $L[\labgle A_0\rangld]=\zos(\langle
    \vsrphi \ranyje / 2)$ in $SU(2)$[]{data-label="fig:KofJ"}](pfrans.eps "fig:"){widck="8cn"
in the center-broken deconfined phase is given transition between decreasing of the potential flat in the middle the plot. It also be explicitly computed from. In center-symmetric confined phase it is just given by the minimum at $\varphi=\pi$.\ ![Full potential $\hat V_{\rm eff}$, normalised to 0 at $\varphi =0$[]{data-label="fig:Veff"}](VeffforT.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"}\ The temperature-dependence the parameter A_0\rangle = \cos(\langle \varphi / 2 \rangle)$ is shown in Fig. \[fig:LofT\], and we observe a second phase transition from the confined to the deconfined at a critical temperature T_c = 305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, {\rm \quad =0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ with string $\sqrt{\sigma}=440$ The corresponding value the lattice is ${T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}=.709$, [@Fingberg:1992ju], and agrees within the errors with our result. The estimate of the error in by that the of identification of $k_{\rm Appendix \[app:match\]. We would also like the difference of the temperature-dependence of $L[\langle A_0\rangle depicted in \[fig:LofT\] and that of the Polyakov $\langle L[A_0]\rangle$. It has been shown in section that in the confined phase they both vanish and both are non-zero in the deconfined the Jensen inequality entails the present observable A_0\rangle takes values the Polyakov $\langle L[A_0]\rangle$, which is in agreement with lattice results. ![Temperature dependence the Polyakov loop $L[\langle A_0\rangle]=\cos(\langle \varphi \rangle / 2)$ in
 in the center-broken deconfinEd phase is gIven bY thE trAnSitiOn poInt between decrEAsinG part of the potential for Small $\VaRPhi$ aND tHe flaT region IN tHE MidDlE oF thE pLOt. it can AlsO be explIcitly compUteD fRom. In the centER-sYmmetric coNfiNed phase it is JusT given By The MInimuM at $\VarphI=\pi$.\

![FulL EffectIve potentIaL $\Hat V_{\rm EFf}$, normaLISeD to 0 aT $\varphi =0$[]{data-label="fIG:VEFf"}](VeffforT.eps "fIg:"){widtH="8cM"}\

thE TEmpEraTure-dependEnCe of tHE order pARaMETEr $L[\LAngle
A_0\rangle ] = \cOs(\langle \varPHi / 2 \rAngle)$ iS sHowN In Fig. \[fIg:Loft\], aND we Observe a secOnd oRder phase TransiTIon from THe confiNed to tHe dEcoNfinED pHaSe aT a CRitICaL teMPerAture $$\labEl{Eq:tc}
T_c =
305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, {\rM MeV},\QQUAD \quaD {T_c}/{\Sqrt{\Sigma}}
=0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ With the string TenSion $\SQrt{\Sigma}=440$ meV. ThE corReSpondIng valUe on tHe Lattice is ${T_c}/{\sqrt{\SigmA}}=.709$, [@Fingberg:1992Ju], aNd AgrEeS withIN the erRorS wiTh our reSult. The EStiMaTE OF tHe systematic error iN iS DOmInated by That of THe UnCErtainty Of The IdenTIFicatIon oF $K_{\rM phys}$, see appendIX \[aPp:Match\].

We WoUld alsO lIke To cOmmenT On thE diffeRence of tHe temPErature-dependeNCe of $L[\langle A_0\rANgLE ]$ DePIcteD in fig. \[fig:LofT\] aNd thAT of tHe PoLYaKov LOop $\laNgle
L[a_0]\rANgLE$. It has been shown in seCtIon \[sec:qCDinpol\] that in the cOnfined phaSE THey both vAnisH AnD Both are non-zero In the Deconfined PHase. HoweVer, thE Jensen iNequality ENTails thaT thE prEseNt oBSErVable $L[\langle A_0\RANgle ]$ TaKes biggEr vAlues thAn tHe POlyAkoV lOop $\langle l[A_0]\rangle$, WhIcH iS iN agReemeNT with latTiCe rEsUltS.

![TempERature DepenDencE oF tHE PoLyakov lOOp $l[\LAnglE A_0\RaNgle]=\Cos(\LaNgle
    \vArphI \RanGle / 2)$ in $SU(2)$[]{Data-label="Fig:lOfT"}](pTrAnS.eps "fig:"){Width="8cm"
 in the center-broken deco nfined pha se is  gi ven  b y th e tr ansition point betw een decreasing part of  thepo t enti a lfor s mall $\ v ar p h i$an dthe  f l at  regi onin themiddle ofthe  p lot. It cana ls o be expli cit ly computedfro m. Inth e c e nter- sym metri c conf i ned ph ase it is  j u st giv e n by th e mi nimu m at $\varphi=\pi $ .\ 
![Full effect ive po te n ti a l  $\ hat  V_{\rm ef f} $, no r malised to 0 at$ \varphi =0$[] {data-label = "fi g:Veff "} ](V e ffforT .eps"f i g:" ){width="8c m"}\ 

The tem peratu r e-depen d ence of  the o rde r p aram e te r$L[ \l a ngl e 
A _0\ r ang le ] = \ co s( \lang le \ v a r p hi /  2\ran gle)$  is shown inFig . \[ f ig: LofT\ ], an d we  o bserv e a se condor der phase trans itio n from th e c on fin ed  to t h e deco nfi ned  phaseat a cr i tic al t e mp erature $$\label{e q: T c }T_c =
30 5^{+ 4 0 }_ {- 5 5}\, {\r mMeV },\q q u ad \q uad{ T_ c}/{\sqr t{\sig m a} }=0.69^{ +. 04}_{- .1 2}\ ,,$ $ wit h  the  strin g tensio n $\s q rt{\sigma}=440 $  MeV. The cor r es p o nd i ng v alu e on the la ttic e  is${T_ c }/ {\s q rt{\s igma} }= . 70 9 $, [@Fingberg:1992j u] , andagree s within theerrors wit h o ur resul t. T h ee stimate of the  syst ematic err o r in isdomin ated bythat of t h e  uncerta int y o f t hei d en tification of $ k_{\ rm  phys}$ , s ee Appe ndi x \ [ap p:m at ch\].

We  would a ls oli ke  to  comm e nt on th edif fe ren ce of the te mpera ture -d ep e nde nce of$ L[ \ l angl eA_ 0\ra ngl e]$ de pict e d i n Fig.\[fig:Lof T\] andth at  of the  Polyakov loo p$\langle
L [A _0] \rangl e $ . It has  been shown in section\ [sec:QC Din Pol\]  tha t in thecon finedpha s e they  bothvanis hand b oth a r e  n on- ze ro in thed e con fined  p hase . Howev er, the Jensen ine q ual ity entails t hat  the p re sen t  o b ser va b le$ L [\langle A_0\ra ngle ]$ ta ke s  b igger valu e s t ha n the P olyakov  loop $\langl e L[A_0]\ rangle$,wh ichi s  in  agreement  with la ttice res u lts.![ Tempe rat ure de pe nde nce o f theP oly akovloop $ L[ \langl e A_0 \r angle]=\ cos(\langle
    \varphi  \rang le /2)$  in $SU(2 )$[ ] {da ta-label= "fig :LofT"}](p tra ns. eps " fig : "){wi dth= " 8c m"
 in_the center-broken_deconfined phase is given_by the_transition_point between_decreasing_part of the_potential for small_$\varphi$ and the flat_region in the_middle_of the plot. It can also be explicitly computed from. In the center-symmetric confined_phase_it is_just_given_by the minimum at $\varphi=\pi$.\

![Full_effective potential $\hat V_{\rm eff}$,_normalised to_0 at $\varphi =0$[]{data-label="fig:Veff"}](VeffforT.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"}\

The temperature-dependence of the_order_parameter $L[\langle
A_0\rangle ]_= \cos(\langle \varphi / 2 \rangle)$ is shown in_Fig. \[fig:LofT\], and we observe a_second order phase_transition_from_the confined to the_deconfined phase at a critical temperature_$$\label{eq:Tc}
T_c =
305^{+ 40}_{-55}\, {\rm MeV},\qquad \quad_{T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}
=0.69^{+.04}_{-.12}\,,$$ with the string tension $\sqrt{\sigma}=440$ MeV._The corresponding value on the lattice_is ${T_c}/{\sqrt{\sigma}}=.709$, [@Fingberg:1992ju], and agrees_within the_errors with our result. The_estimate of the_systematic error_in is dominated_by that of the uncertainty of_the identification of_$k_{\rm phys}$, see Appendix \[app:match\].

We would also_like_to comment on_the_difference_of the_temperature-dependence of $L[\langle_A_0\rangle_]$ depicted_in_Fig. \[fig:LofT\] and that of the Polyakov_loop_$\langle
L[A_0]\rangle$. It has been shown in section \[sec:QCDinPol\]_that in the confined_phase_they both vanish and_both are non-zero in the_deconfined phase. However, the Jensen inequality_entails that_the present_observable $L[\langle A_0\rangle ]$ takes bigger values than the Polyakov loop_$\langle L[A_0]\rangle$, which is in agreement_with lattice results.

![Temperature dependence_of the_Polyakov_loop $L[\langle A_0\rangle]=\cos(\langle
__ _\varphi \rangle / 2)$ in $SU(2)$[]{data-label="fig:LofT"}](ptrans.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"