-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[K+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p]{}. && Thus, equation is satisfied, which means that both sides of OPE transform the same way under the action of $L_{0}$. Furthermore, using the OPE inside the three-point functions and comparing the coefficients with it can be seen that C\_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12]{}. Therefore, we will rewrite $C_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ as C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}=C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}, where, by convention, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1.

The coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ can be calculated by demanding that both sides of transform the same way under the other generators $L_m$ and $M_n$. Thus, the form of the OPE is completely constrained by symmetries to depend only on external inputs, such as the structure constants, the spectrum of primary operators appearing in the OPE, and the central charge. In other words, if these dynamical inputs are given to us, we can use symmetries to calculate all the correlation functions in a BMS-invariant field theory. These dynamical inputs can be used to classify and completely specify a given BMS-invariant field theory. However, any random sets of these dynamical inputs need not constitute a consistent field theory; they must satisfy a constrain equation given by the BMS bootstrap equation, which arises as a condition for the associativity of the operator product algebra.

Recursion relations
-------------------

Now let us try to find recursion relations for evaluating the coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$. For the sake of simplicity we will consider the case ${\Delta}_{1}={\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\,\xi_{1}=\xi_{2}=\xi$. Applying both sides of equation to the vacuum we have \_[1]{}(u,v)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\_[
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[K+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p ] { }. & & Thus, equation is satisfied, which means that both sides of OPE translate the like room under the action of $ L_{0}$. Furthermore, use the OPE inside the three - degree functions and comparing the coefficient with it can be seen that C\_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12 ] { }. Therefore, we will rewrite $ C_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ as C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}=C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}\_[12]{}\^[p {, }, ] { }, where, by convention, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1. 

 The coefficient $ { \beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ can be account by demanding that both english of transform the same way under the early generators $ L_m$ and $ M_n$. Thus, the form of the OPE is completely constrained by symmetries to depend merely on external inputs, such as the structure constants, the spectrum of basal operators appearing in the OPE, and the central care. In other words, if these dynamical inputs are given to us, we can practice symmetries to calculate all the correlation functions in a BMS - invariant playing field hypothesis. These dynamical inputs can be used to classify and completely specify a given fecal matter - changeless battlefield theory. However, any random set of these dynamic input need not constitute a consistent discipline hypothesis; they must satisfy a constrain equation given by the BMS bootstrap equality, which arises as a condition for the associativity of the operator product algebra. 

 Recursion relations 
 ------------------- 

 Now get us try to find recursion relations for evaluating the coefficient $ { \beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$. For the sake of simplicity we will regard the shell $ { \Delta}_{1}={\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\,\xi_{1}=\xi_{2}=\xi$. Applying both sides of equation to the vacuum we accept \_[1]{}(u, v)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\ _ [
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[N+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p]{}. && Thus, eqmation is satisfnwd, whirh meana that buth sides of OPE transform tie sqme wqy under the action of $L_{0}$. Furthegmore, usibg tie OPE inside thx three-point fhkctious and comparing the coeffhcients with id zau be seen that C\_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12]{}. Therefore, we wyll rewtihe $C_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\ajpha}}$ ws C\_[12]{}\^[l{,},]{}=B\_[12]{}\^[p]{}\_[12]{}\^[k{,},]{}, where, by convention, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1.

The coeffidients ${\ueta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\allha}}$ can be calculated by dfmanfing that both sidfs of transdorm rhe same way under the other generztors $L_m$ and $M_n$. Thus, the form ow the OPE is conpoetfny constraiied by symmetries bp depetd only on external ikputs, suxh as the structure cmnstants, the specttum of prikaxy operators appearint un thg OPE, and rhe cehtcal chargf. Ii other worss, if these dynamical inputs ate tiven to us, ws can tsq symmetries to calculate all the correnatjon functions in a BMS-ibvariant field theory. These dygamical inputs can be used to classify and compledely aoecnnn a euvfn BMS-invariant field theory. However, any randjj xens of these dynamlcal inputs need npt cpgstitute a covsisteuf rield theory; they lust sajisfy q constrayn eauation given by the BMS boitstrap equanion, which arises as a condition yor thg assoviativity of the operatur pdoduct algehra.

Recursjun relations
-------------------

Now uet uv try to find recursion rejations fir eraluatine thg coeffycients ${\beha}_{12}^{p\{\veg{n},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$. For the sake ox simplicihy we will consider the case ${\Delta}_{1}={\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\,\xo_{1}=\xh_{2}=\xi$. Applyiny both sides of equwtion to the vccuum we have \_[1]{}(u,v)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\_[
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[K+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p]{}. && Thus, equation is satisfied, which both of OPE the same way Furthermore, the OPE inside three-point functions and the coefficients with it can be that C\_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12]{}. Therefore, we will rewrite $C_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ as C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}=C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}, where, by convention, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1. coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ can be calculated by demanding that both sides of transform the way the generators and $M_n$. Thus, the form of the OPE is completely constrained by symmetries to depend only external inputs, such as the structure constants, the of primary operators appearing the OPE, and the central In words, if dynamical are to us, we use symmetries to calculate all the correlation functions in a BMS-invariant field theory. These dynamical inputs can used to completely specify given field However, any random these dynamical inputs need not constitute theory; they must satisfy a constrain equation given the BMS equation, which arises as a condition the associativity of the operator product algebra. Recursion ------------------- Now let us try to find recursion relations for evaluating the coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$. For of simplicity we will the case ${\Delta}_{1}={\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\,\xi_{1}=\xi_{2}=\xi$. both of to vacuum we \_[1]{}(u,v)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\_[
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[K+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p]{}. && Thus, equAtion is satIsfieD, whIch MeAns tHat bOth sides of OPE tRAnsfOrm the same way under the aCtion Of $l_{0}$. furtHErMore, uSing the opE INSidE tHe ThrEe-POiNt funCtiOns and cOmparing thE coEfFicients with IT cAn be seen thAt C\_[12]{}\^[P{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12]{}. TherefoRe, wE will rEwRitE $c_{12}^{p\{\vec{K},\veC{q}\},{\alpHa}}$ as C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}=c\_[12]{}\^[P]{}\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}, wherE, by convenTiON, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1.

The cOEfficieNTS ${\bEta}_{12}^{p\{\Vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ can bE CaLCulated by demanDing thAt BOtH SIdeS of Transform tHe Same wAY under tHE oTHER geNErators $L_m$ and $M_N$. Thus, the forM Of tHe OPE iS cOmpLEtely cOnstrAiNEd bY symmetries To dePend only oN exterNAl inputS, Such as tHe struCtuRe cOnstANtS, tHe sPeCTruM Of PriMAry OperatorS aPpEarinG in tHE ope, and The CentRal chArge. In other woRds, If thESe dYnamiCal inPuts ArE giveN to us, wE can uSe Symmetries to calCulaTe all the cOrrElAtiOn FunctIOns in a bMS-InvAriant fIeld theORy. THeSE DYnAmical inputs can be uSeD TO cLassify aNd compLEtElY Specify a GiVen bMS-iNVArianT fieLD tHeory. HowEver, anY RaNdOm sets oF tHese dyNaMicAl iNputs NEed nOt consTitute a cOnsisTEnt field theory; THey must satisfY A cONStRAin eQuaTion given by The Bms booTstrAP eQuaTIon, whIch arIsES aS A condition for the assOcIativiTy of tHe operator proDuct algebrA.

rECursion rElatIOnS
-------------------

now let us try to fInd reCursion relATions for EvaluAting the CoefficieNTS ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\veC{k},\vEc{q}\},{\AlpHa}}$. FOR ThE sake of simpliCITy we WiLl consiDer The case ${\delTa}_{1}={\DEltA}_{2}={\DeLtA},\,\xi_{1}=\xi_{2}=\xi$. ApPlying boTh SiDeS oF eqUatioN To the vacUuM we HaVe \_[1]{}(u,V)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\_[
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{ }e\^[(\_[1 ]{}+\ _[2 ]{} -\ _[p] {})] {}(\_[=0]{}\^[ K +Q]{ }C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u \^[K+ Q- ] {}v\ ^ )( \_[p] {}+K+Q) L \_ M \ _|\ _[ p] {}, \_ [ p] {}. & & T hus, eq uation issat is fied, whichm ea ns that bo thsides of OPE  tr ansfor mthe sameway  unde r thea ctionof $L_{0} $. Furthe r more, u s i ng  the  OPE inside the t h re e -point functio ns and  c o mp a r ing  th e coeffici en ts wi t h it ca n  b e s een that C\_[12]{ }\^[p{0,0}, 0 ]{} C\_[12 ]{ }\^ [ p]{}=C \_[p1 2] { }.Therefore,we w ill rewri te $C_ { 12}^{p\ { \vec{k} ,\vec{ q}\ },{ \alp h a} }$  as  C \ _[1 2 ]{ }\^ [ p{, },]{}=C\ _[ 12 ]{}\^ [p]{ } \ _ [ 12]{ }\^ [p{, },]{} , where, by c onv enti o n,\_[12 ]{}\^ [p{0 ,0 },0]{ }=1.
The c oe fficients ${\be ta}_ {12}^{p\{ \ve c{ k}, \v ec{q} \ },{\al pha }}$  can be  calcul a ted  b y d em anding that both s id e s  o f transf orm th e  s am e  way und er  th e ot h e r gen erat o rs  $L_m$ a nd $M_ n $.  T hus, th eform o fthe  OP E isc ompl etelyconstrai ned b y  symmetries to depend only o n  e x t er n al i npu ts, such as  the stru ctur e  c ons t ants,  thesp e ct r um of primary opera to rs app earin g in the OPE,  and the c e n t ral char ge.I no ther words, if  thes e dynamica l  inputsare g iven tous, we ca n use symm etr ies  to  ca l c ul ate all the c o r rela ti on func tio ns in a  BM S-i nva ria nt  field th eory. Th es edy na mic al in p uts canbe  us ed  to  clas s ify an d com plet el ys pec ify a g i ve n BMS- in va rian t f ie ld th eory .  Ho wever,any rando m s e ts o fth ese dyn amical inputs  n eed not co ns tit ute ac o nsistent  field theory; they mus t  satisf y a  cons trai n equatio n g iven b y t h e BMSbootst rap e qu ati o n , whi c h  a ris es  as a cond i t ion  forth e as sociati vity of the operat o r p roduct algebr a.
Rec u r si onr el a tio ns --- - - --------------
Now let u st ry  to find r e cur si on rela tions f or ev a luating  the coef ficients${ \bet a } _{1 2}^{p\{\ve c{k},\ve c{q}\},{\ a lpha} } $.  Forthe  sakeof  si mplic ity we wil l con siderth e case  ${\D el ta}_{1}= {\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\ ,\xi_{ 1}=\x i_{ 2}=\xi$.App l yin g both si desof equatio n t o t he va cuu m  we h ave\ _[ 1]{ } (u,v) |,=\ _ [p]{}u\^[ - 2+ \_[ p ] {} ]{}e\^[(2-\ _ [ 
-\_[1]{}-\_[2]{}+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(\_[1]{}+\_[2]{}-\_[p]{})]{}(\_[=0]{}\^[K+Q]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}u\^[K+Q-]{}v\^)(\_[p]{}+K+Q)L\_M\_|\_[p]{},\_[p]{}. &&_Thus, equation_is satisfied, which means_that both_sides_of OPE_transform_the same way_under the action_of $L_{0}$. Furthermore, using_the OPE inside_the_three-point functions and comparing the coefficients with it can be seen that C\_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}=C\_[p12]{}. Therefore,_we_will rewrite_$C_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$_as_C\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}=C\_[12]{}\^[p]{}\_[12]{}\^[p{,},]{}, where, by convention, \_[12]{}\^[p{0,0},0]{}=1.

The_coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$ can be calculated_by demanding_that both sides of transform the same way_under_the other generators_$L_m$ and $M_n$. Thus, the form of the OPE_is completely constrained by symmetries to_depend only on_external_inputs,_such as the structure_constants, the spectrum of primary operators_appearing in the OPE, and the_central charge. In other words, if these_dynamical inputs are given to us,_we can use symmetries to_calculate all_the correlation functions in a_BMS-invariant field theory._These dynamical_inputs can be_used to classify and completely specify_a given BMS-invariant_field theory. However, any random sets_of_these dynamical inputs_need_not_constitute a_consistent field theory;_they_must satisfy_a_constrain equation given by the BMS_bootstrap_equation, which arises as a condition for_the associativity of the_operator_product algebra.

Recursion relations
-------------------

Now let_us try to find recursion_relations for evaluating the coefficients ${\beta}_{12}^{p\{\vec{k},\vec{q}\},{\alpha}}$._For the_sake of_simplicity we will consider the case ${\Delta}_{1}={\Delta}_{2}={\Delta},\,\xi_{1}=\xi_{2}=\xi$. Applying both sides of_equation to the vacuum we have_\_[1]{}(u,v)|,=\_[p]{}u\^[-2+\_[p]{}]{}e\^[(2-\_[