12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d\log d$. This proves the desired claim.

To prove the lower bound on $\lambda_2(\E[M])$, notice that $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq:topl5}
\E[M] &=&  \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{1}{\kappa_j -1} \sum_{i<\i \in S_j}  \E\Bigg[ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg] (e_i - e_{\i})(e_i - e_{\i})^\top  \;.\end{aligned}$$ Using the fact that $p_{j,a} = a$ for each $j \in [n]$, and the definition of rank-breaking graph $G_{j,a}$, we have that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:topl6}
\E\Bigg[ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg] &=& \P\Big[\I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j\}} + \I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(\i) \leq \ell_j\}} \geq 1 \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Big] \nonumber\\
& \geq &  \P\Big[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j \Big| (i,\i \in S_j)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ The following lemma provides a lower bound on $\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j | (i,\i \in S_j)]$.

\[lem:prob\_toplbound\] Consider a ranking $\sigma$ over a set of items $S$ of size $\kappa$. For any item $i \in S$, $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq:prob_toplbound_eq}
\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell] \geq e^{-2b}\frac{\ell}{\
12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d\log d$. This proves the desired claim. 

 To prove the lower bounce on $ \lambda_2(\E[M])$, detect that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{eq: topl5 } 
 \E[M ] & = &   \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{1}{\kappa_j -1 } \sum_{i<\i \in S_j }   \E\Bigg [ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j } \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j, a}\ } } \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg ] (e_i - e_{\i})(e_i - e_{\i})^\top   \;.\end{aligned}$$ Using the fact that $ p_{j, a } = a$ for each $ j \in [ n]$, and the definition of rank - break graph $ G_{j, a}$, we have that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: topl6 } 
 \E\Bigg [ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j } \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j, a}\ } } \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg ] & = & \P\Big[\I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j\ } } + \I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(\i) \leq \ell_j\ } } \geq 1 \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Big ] \nonumber\\ 
 & \geq &   \P\Big[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j \Big| (i,\i \in S_j)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ The following lemma put up a gloomy bound on $ \P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j | (i,\i \in S_j)]$. 

 \[lem: prob\_toplbound\ ] Consider a ranking $ \sigma$ over a set of items $ S$ of size $ \kappa$. For any token $ i \in S$, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{eq: prob_toplbound_eq } 
 \P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell ] \geq e^{-2b}\frac{\ell}{\
12}e^{6b}/\bfta\alpha^2) d\log d$. This proyes the desired eoaim.

To prove the lowdr bound on $\lambda_2(\E[M])$, notice vhat $$\begib{aligned}
 \label{eq:topl5}
\E[M] &=&  \sum_{j = 1}^j \frac{1}{\kappa_j -1} \sum_{i<\i \in S_j}  \E\Bign[ \sum_{z = 1}^{\eln_o} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Bin| (i,\i \in S_j) \Tigg] (e_i - e_{\i})(e_i - e_{\k})^\tlp  \;.\end{aligned}$$ Using the fact that $[_{j,a} = a$ gog each $j \in [n]$, wnd uhe defjnition of rank-breaking graph $G_{j,a}$, se have that $$\begin{alogned}
\label{eq:topl6}
\E\Bigg[ \sum_{a = 1}^{\elp_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (l,\i \in S_j) \Bitg] &=& \[\Vig[\I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(i) \ueq \ell_j\}} + \P_{\{\vigma_j^{-1}(\i) \les \ell_j\}} \geq 1 \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Big] \novumbex\\
& \geq &  \P\Bit[(\sugmw^{-1}(h) \leq \ell_j \Uig| (i,\i \in S_j)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ Dhe folkowing lemma pvovidxs a lower bound on $\P[(\sigme^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j | (i,\i \in S_t)]$.

\[lem:prob\_tmpmbound\] Consider a rqnkinc $\sicma$ ucer a aev or itemd $S$ of size $\kzppa$. For ant item $i \in S$, $$\begin{slytned}
 \label{eq:pdob_topjbjund_eq}
\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell] \geq e^{-2b}\frac{\ell}{\
12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d\log d$. This proves the desired prove lower bound $\lambda_2(\E[M])$, notice that = \frac{1}{\kappa_j -1} \sum_{i<\i S_j} \E\Bigg[ \sum_{a 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i S_j) \Bigg] (e_i - e_{\i})(e_i - e_{\i})^\top \;.\end{aligned}$$ Using the fact that $p_{j,a} a$ for each $j \in [n]$, and the definition of rank-breaking graph $G_{j,a}$, have $$\begin{aligned} \E\Bigg[ = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg] &=& \P\Big[\I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j\}} + \I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(\i) \ell_j\}} \geq 1 \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Big] & \geq & \P\Big[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \ell_j \Big| (i,\i \in S_j)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ following provides a bound $\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \ell_j | (i,\i S_j)]$. \[lem:prob\_toplbound\] Consider a ranking $\sigma$ over a set of items $S$ of size $\kappa$. For any $i \in \label{eq:prob_toplbound_eq} \P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \ell] e^{-2b}\frac{\ell}{\
12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d\log d$. This proveS the desireD claiM.

To ProVe The lOwer Bound on $\lambda_2(\E[m])$, NotiCe that $$\begin{aligned}
 \labeL{eq:toPl5}
\e[m] &=&  \sum_{J = 1}^N \fRac{1}{\kaPpa_j -1} \sum_{I<\I \iN s_J}  \E\BIgG[ \sUm_{a = 1}^{\ElL_J} \I_{\{(I,\i) \in G_{J,a}\}} \BIg| (i,\i \in S_J) \Bigg] (e_i - e_{\i})(e_I - e_{\i})^\ToP  \;.\end{aligned}$$ USInG the fact thAt $p_{J,a} = a$ for each $j \iN [n]$, aNd the dEfIniTIon of RanK-breaKing grAPh $G_{j,a}$, wE have that $$\BeGIn{aligNEd}
\label{EQ:ToPl6}
\E\BIgg[ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{J,A}\}} \BIG| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg] &=& \P\BiG[\I_{\{\sigmA_j^{-1}(I) \LeQ \ELl_j\}} + \i_{\{\siGma_j^{-1}(\i) \leq \elL_j\}} \Geq 1 \BiG| (I,\i \in S_j) \BIG] \nONUMbeR\\
& \Geq &  \P\Big[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \Leq \ell_j \Big| (i,\I \In S_J)\Big]\,.\enD{aLigNEd}$$ The fOllowInG LemMa provides a LoweR bound on $\P[(\Sigma^{-1}(i) \LEq \ell_j | (i,\I \In S_j)]$.

\[lem:Prob\_toPlbOunD\] ConSIdEr A raNkINg $\sIGmA$ ovER a sEt of itemS $S$ Of Size $\kAppa$. fOR ANy itEm $i \In S$, $$\bEgin{aLigned}
 \label{eq:ProB_topLBouNd_eq}
\P[(\Sigma^{-1}(I) \leq \ElL] \geq e^{-2B}\frac{\eLl}{\
12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d \log d$. T his p rov esth e de sire d claim.

To p r ovethe lower bound on $\l ambda _2 ( \E[M ] )$ , not ice tha t  $ $ \ beg in {a lig ne d } \lab el{ eq:topl 5}
\E[M] & =& \ sum_{j = 1}^ n  \ frac{1}{\k app a_j -1} \sum _{i <\i \i nS_j }   \E\ Big g[ \s um_{a=  1}^{\ ell_j} \I _{ \ {(i,\i )  \in G_ { j ,a }\}}  \Big| (i,\i \inS _j )  \Bigg] (e_i -  e_{\i }) ( e_ i - e _{\ i})^\top \; .\end { aligned } $$ U s ing the fact that  $p_{j,a} = a$for ea ch  $j \in [n ]$, a nd the  definition  ofrank-brea king g r aph $G_ { j,a}$,we hav e t hat  $$\ b eg in {al ig n ed} \l abe l {eq :topl6}\E \B igg[\sum _ { a = 1} ^{\ ell_ j} \I _{\{(i,\i) \i n G _{j, a }\} } \Bi g| (i ,\i\i n S_j ) \Big g] &= &\P\Big[\I_{\{\s igma _j^{-1}(i ) \ le q \ el l_j\} }  + \I_ {\{ \si gma_j^{ -1}(\i) \le q\ e l l_ j\}} \geq 1 \Big|(i , \ i\in S_j)  \Big] \n on u mber\\
&  \ geq  & \ P \Big[ (\si g ma ^{-1}(i)  \leq\ el l_ j \Big|  ( i,\i \ in  S_ j)\ Big]\ , .\en d{alig ned}$$ T he fo l lowing lemma p r ovides a lowe r  b o u nd on $ \P[ (\sigma^{-1 }(i) \leq  \el l _j  |( i,\i\in S _j ) ]$ . 

\[lem:prob\_toplb ou nd\] C onsid er a ranking$\sigma$ o v e r  a set o f it e ms $S$ of size $\ kappa $. For any item $i\in S $, $$\be gin{align e d }
 \labe l{e q:p rob _to p l bo und_eq}
\P[(\ s i gma^ {- 1}(i) \ leq  \ell]\ge q e ^{- 2b} \f rac{\ell} {\
12}e^{6b}/\beta\alpha^2) d\log_d$. This_proves the desired claim.

To_prove the_lower_bound on_$\lambda_2(\E[M])$,_notice that $$\begin{aligned}
_\label{eq:topl5}
\E[M] &=& _\sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{1}{\kappa_j_-1} \sum_{i<\i \in_S_j}_ \E\Bigg[ \sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i \in S_j) \Bigg] (e_i_-_e_{\i})(e_i -_e_{\i})^\top__\;.\end{aligned}$$ Using the fact that_$p_{j,a} = a$ for each_$j \in_[n]$, and the definition of rank-breaking graph $G_{j,a}$,_we_have that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:topl6}
\E\Bigg[_\sum_{a = 1}^{\ell_j} \I_{\{(i,\i) \in G_{j,a}\}} \Big| (i,\i \in_S_j) \Bigg] &=& \P\Big[\I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j\}}_+ \I_{\{\sigma_j^{-1}(\i) \leq_\ell_j\}}_\geq_1 \Big| (i,\i \in_S_j) \Big] \nonumber\\
& \geq & _\P\Big[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j \Big| (i,\i \in_S_j)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ The following lemma provides a lower_bound on $\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell_j |_(i,\i \in S_j)]$.

\[lem:prob\_toplbound\] Consider a_ranking $\sigma$_over a set of items_$S$ of size_$\kappa$. For_any item $i_\in S$, $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{eq:prob_toplbound_eq}
\P[(\sigma^{-1}(i) \leq \ell]_\geq e^{-2b}\frac{\ell}{\