 problem. The magnitude of the Pioneer 10 post-fit weighted RMS residuals of $\approx 0.1$ mm/s, implies that the spacecraft angular position on the sky is known to $\le 1.0$ milliarcseconds (mas). (Pioneer 11, with $\approx 0.18$ mm/s, yields the result $\approx 1.75$ mas.) At their great distances, the trajectories of the Pioneers are not gravitationally affected by the Earth. (The round-trip light time is now $\sim 24 $ hours for Pioneer 10.) This suggests that the sources of the annual and diurnal terms are both Earth related.

Such a modeling problem arises when there are errors in any of the parameters of the spacecraft orientation with respect to the chosen reference frame. Because of these errors, the system of equations that describes the spacecraft’s motion in this reference frame is under-determined and its solution requires non-linear estimation techniques. In addition, the whole estimation process is subject to Kalman filtering and smoothing methods. Therefore, if there are modeling errors in the Earth’s ephemeris, the orientation of the Earth’s spin axis (precession and nutation), or in the station coordinates (polar motion and length of day variations), the least-squares process (which determines best-fit values of the three direction cosines) will leave small diurnal and annual components in the Doppler residuals, like those seen in Figures \[annualresiduals\]-\[opp96\].

Orbit determination programs are particularly sensitive to an error in a poorly observed direction [@melbourne]. If not corrected for, such an error could in principle significantly affect the overall navigational accuracy. In the case of the Pioneer spacecraft, navigation was performed using only Doppler tracking, or line-of-sight observations. The other directions, perpendicular to the line-of-sight or in the plane of the sky, are poorly constrained by the data available. At present, it is infeasible to precisely parameterize the systematic errors with a physical model. That would have allowed one to reduce the errors to a level below those from the best available ephemeris and Earth orientation models. A local empirical parameterization is possible, but not a parameterization over many months.

We conclude that for both Pioneer 10 and 11, there are small periodic errors in solar system modeling that are largely masked by maneuvers and by the overall plasma noise. But because these sinusoids are essentially uncorrelated with
problem. The magnitude of the Pioneer 10 post - fit weighted RMS residuals of $ \approx 0.1 $ mm / s, entail that the spacecraft angular placement on the sky is known to $ \le 1.0 $ milliarcseconds (mas). (Pioneer 11, with $ \approx 0.18 $ mm / s, yields the result $ \approx 1.75 $ master of arts .) At their great distances, the trajectory of the Pioneers are not gravitationally affected by the Earth. (The round - trip unaccented time is now $ \sim 24 $ hour for Pioneer 10 .) This suggests that the sources of the annual and diurnal term are both Earth related. 

 Such a modeling problem arises when there are errors in any of the parameter of the spacecraft orientation with respect to the chosen reference book frame. Because of these errors, the system of equations that describe the spacecraft ’s motion in this reference frame is under - determined and its solution requires non - analogue estimation techniques. In addition, the whole estimation process is capable to Kalman filtering and smoothing method. Therefore, if there are modeling errors in the Earth ’s ephemeris, the orientation of the Earth ’s spin axis (precession and nutation), or in the station coordinates (diametric motion and length of sidereal day variation), the least - square process (which determines well - fit values of the three direction cosines) will leave belittled diurnal and annual components in the Doppler residuals, like those seen in Figures \[annualresiduals\]-\[opp96\ ]. 

 Orbit determination programs are peculiarly sensitive to an error in a poorly observed direction [ @melbourne ]. If not corrected for, such an error could in rationale importantly involve the overall navigational accuracy. In the case of the Pioneer spacecraft, navigation was performed practice only Doppler tracking, or line - of - sight observations. The other directions, perpendicular to the tune - of - sight or in the airplane of the sky, are poorly constrained by the data available. At present, it is infeasible to precisely parameterize the systematic mistake with a physical exemplar. That would have allowed one to repress the errors to a level below those from the dependable available ephemeris and Earth orientation mannequin. A local empirical parameterization is possible, but not a parameterization over many months. 

 We conclude that for both Pioneer 10 and 11, there are small periodic errors in solar system mold that are largely masked by maneuvers and by the overall plasma randomness. But because these sinusoids are essentially uncorrelated with
 prlblem. The magnitude of tme Pioneer 10 post-yut weijhted RJS residjals of $\approx 0.1$ mm/s, implies vhat the wpacecraft angular posktion on nhe sky iw kniqn to $\le 1.0$ milliarcseconda (mas). ('ioneer 11, with $\akprox 0.18$ mm/s, yhelds the resunt $\a'prox 1.75$ mas.) At their great distances, ehe trakeftories of the Piomqers are not gravitationally affected gy the Tarth. (The round-tril light time is now $\sim 24 $ jourd for Pioneer 10.) Thid suggests jgat rhe sources uf the annlcl and diurhal terms are both Earth relatea.

Such a modelint prohnem arises xhen trere are errors in aty of tne parameters pf vhe wpacecraft orientatioi with respect to thg chosen rafzrence frame. Because if thesg errmrs, gye rysuem or equahiois that desdribes the wpacecraft’s motion on nnis referencs framq ys under-determined and its solution reqlirea non-linear estimation rechniques. In additioj, the whoje estimation process is subject to Kalman filterhng aid smiobhine mfthods. Therefore, if there are modeling errors jn tme Earth’s ephemevis, the orientatiom lf jhe Earth’s spiv axis (prscession and nutatlon), or yn thw station cootdinates (polar motion and lwngth of day cariations), the leadt-squares pxocess (whicn determines best-fit vauues of the thrfe directjun cosines) will ueane skall diurnal and annual coiponents mn thz Dopplef rexidualf, like thode sect in Figures \[annuapresibuals\]-\[mpp96\].

Orbit dftermination programs are partirnlarly sensitova tm an errjr in a poorly obsqrved directiou [@melbouxne]. If not correbted for, vuch an errjr could in pslnciple signmficantly affwct rhe ovefxll navigationsl accuraby. In rhe case of the Pipnegr spacecraft, navnyauiin was performrd jsigg oily Dj[pler trackitg, of lkme-of-skght observctkons. The other directionv, pedpendicular to the llne-of-sighj or in tre plane of tne sky, are poorly fonstcained by tne qata available. At present, it ia infeasihle to preciselr pavamejerize the xystematic errors with a physical model. That would have aolowed one to reducg tme errors to a ledel below those from the best available ephemevis and Earth orientatjon mogels. W local empirical parameterization is possible, but not a parameterization over many months.

Ws comcludv tkat for bjth 'iuneer 10 and 11, therv are small periodic errors in sular sysdei modeling that are largely karked by maneuxers and by the overall llasma npise. But because these sinusoidx are essentially uncorrclated wirh
problem. The magnitude of the Pioneer 10 RMS of $\approx mm/s, implies that the is known to 1.0$ milliarcseconds (mas). 11, with $\approx 0.18$ mm/s, yields result $\approx 1.75$ mas.) At their great distances, the trajectories of the Pioneers not gravitationally affected by the Earth. (The round-trip light time is now $\sim $ for 10.) suggests that the sources of the annual and diurnal terms are both Earth related. Such a problem arises when there are errors in any the parameters of the orientation with respect to the reference Because of errors, system equations that describes spacecraft’s motion in this reference frame is under-determined and its solution requires non-linear estimation techniques. In addition, whole estimation subject to filtering smoothing Therefore, if there errors in the Earth’s ephemeris, the Earth’s spin axis (precession and nutation), or in station coordinates motion and length of day variations), least-squares process (which determines best-fit values of the direction cosines) will leave small diurnal and annual components in the Doppler residuals, like those Figures \[annualresiduals\]-\[opp96\]. Orbit determination are particularly sensitive an in poorly direction [@melbourne]. not corrected for, such an error could in principle significantly affect overall navigational accuracy. In the case of the Pioneer spacecraft, performed only Doppler tracking, line-of-sight observations. The other perpendicular the line-of-sight or in of sky, by data At present, it is to precisely parameterize the systematic with a physical model. to reduce the errors to a level below from the best available ephemeris and Earth models. A local empirical parameterization is possible, but not a parameterization over months. We for both Pioneer 10 and 11, there are periodic errors in solar modeling that are largely masked by maneuvers and by overall noise. But these sinusoids are uncorrelated with
 problem. The magnitude of the PIoneer 10 post-Fit weIghTed rMs resIduaLs of $\approx 0.1$ mm/s, iMPlieS that the spacecraft anguLar poSiTIon oN ThE sky iS known tO $\Le 1.0$ MILliArCsEcoNdS (MaS). (PionEer 11, With $\appRox 0.18$ mm/s, yielDs tHe Result $\approx 1.75$ MAs.) at their greAt dIstances, the tRajEctoriEs Of tHE PionEerS are nOt gravITationAlly affecTeD By the EARth. (The rOUNd-Trip Light time is now $\sim 24 $ HOuRS for Pioneer 10.) ThiS suggeStS ThAT The SouRces of the aNnUal anD Diurnal TErMS ARe bOTh Earth relateD.

Such a modelINg pRoblem ArIseS When thEre arE eRRorS in any of the ParaMeters of tHe spacECraft orIEntatioN with rEspEct To thE ChOsEn rEfERenCE fRamE. becAuse of thEsE eRrors, The sYSTEM of eQuaTionS that Describes the sPacEcraFT’s mOtion In thiS refErEnce fRame is Under-DeTermined and its sOlutIon requirEs nOn-LinEaR estiMAtion tEchNiqUes. In adDition, tHE whOlE ESTiMation process is subJeCT To kalman fiLterinG AnD sMOothing mEtHodS. TheREFore, iF theRE aRe modeliNg erroRS iN tHe Earth’S ePhemerIs, The OriEntatIOn of The EarTh’s spin aXis (prECession and nutaTIon), or in the staTIoN COoRDinaTes (Polar motion And lENgth Of daY VaRiaTIons), tHe leaSt-SQuARes process (which deteRmInes beSt-fit Values of the thRee directiON COsines) wiLl leAVe SMall diurnal and AnnuaL componentS In the DopPler rEsiduals, Like those SEEn in FiguRes \[AnnUalResIDUaLs\]-\[opp96\].

Orbit detERMinaTiOn progrAms Are partIcuLarLy sEnsItIve to an erRor in a poOrLy ObSeRveD direCTion [@melbOuRne]. if Not CorreCTed for, Such aN errOr CoULd iN princiPLe SIGnifIcAnTly aFfeCt The ovEralL NavIgationAl accuracY. In THe caSe Of The PionEer spacecraft, NaVigation waS pErfOrmed uSINg only DoPpler tracking, or line-of-siGHt obserVatIons. THe otHer directIonS, perpeNdiCUlar to The linE-of-siGhT or IN The plANE oF thE sKy, are poorlY COnsTrainEd By thE data avAilable. At present, it IS inFeasible to preCisEly pARAmEteRIzE The SySTemATIc errors with a phYsical modeL. THAt Would have aLLowEd One to reDuce the ErrorS To a leveL below thoSe from the BeSt avAILabLe ephemeriS and EartH orientatIOn modELs. a locaL emPiricaL pAraMeterIzatioN Is pOssibLe, but nOt A paramEteriZaTion over Many months.

We conclude thaT for boTh PioNeeR 10 and 11, there Are SMalL periodic ErroRs in solar sYstEm mOdeliNg tHAt are LargELy MasKEd by mAneuVErs and by tHE oVerALL pLasma noise. BUT BEcaUse thEse SInusoiDs arE essentially uncorRElated with
 problem. The magnitude of  the Pione er 10  po st- fi t we ight ed RMS residua l s of  $\approx 0.1$ mm/s, i mplie st hatt he  spac ecrafta ng u l arpo si tio no nthe s kyis know n to $\le1.0 $milliarcseco n ds  (mas). (P ion eer 11, with  $\ approx  0 .18 $  mm/s , y ields  the r e sult $ \approx 1 .7 5 $ mas. )  At the i r  g reat  distances, the t r aj e ctories of the  Pione er s  a r e  no t g ravitation al ly af f ected b y  t h e Ear t h. (The round -trip light tim e is n ow  $\ s im 24$ hou rs for  Pioneer 10 .) T his sugge sts th a t the s o urces o f theann ual  and di ur nal  t e rms ar e b o thEarth re la te d.

S ucha m o deli ngprob lem a rises when th ere  are err ors i n any  ofth e par ameter s ofth e spacecraft or ient ation wit h r es pec tto th e  chose n r efe rence f rame. B e cau se o f  t hese errors, the s ys t e mof equat ions t h at  d e scribesth e s pace c r aft’s  mot i on  in this  refer e nc eframe i sunder- de ter min ed an d  its  solut ion requ iresn on-linear esti m ation techniq u es . In addi tio n, the whol e es t imat ionp ro ces s  is s ubjec tt oK alman filtering and  s moothi ng me thods. Theref ore, if th e r e  are mod elin g  e r rors in the Ea rth’s  ephemeris ,  the ori entat ion of t he Earth’ s spin axi s ( pre ces sio n an d nutation),o r  inth e stati oncoordin ate s ( pol armo tion andlength o fda yva ria tions ) , the le as t-s qu are s pro c ess (w hichdete rm in e s b est-fit va l u es o fth e th ree  d irect ionc osi nes) wi ll leavesma l l di ur na l and a nnual compone nt s in the D op ple r resi d u als, lik e those seen in Figures \[annua lre sidua ls\] -\[opp96\ ].
Orbit  de t ermina tion p rogra ms  ar e parti c u la rly  s ensitive t o anerror  i n apoorlyobserved direction [@m elbourne]. If  no t co r r ec ted fo r , s uc h  an e rror could in p rinciple s ig n if icantly af f ect  t he over all nav igati o nal acc uracy. In  the case  o f th e Pio neer space craft, n avigation was p e rf ormed  us ing on ly  Do ppler  track i ng,  or l ine-of -s ight o bserv at ions. Th e other directions, per pendic ulartothe line- of- s igh t or in t he p lane of th e s ky,  arepoo r ly co nstr a in edb y the  dat a  availabl e .Atp r es ent, it isi n f eas ibletop recise ly p arameterize the s y stematic error s wi t h  aphy s ical  m odel. That wou ldha v e  allowed  o ne to reduc e the er ro r s toa leve l belo w those f ro m  the b estava ilable ep hem er i s and E ar th orient atio nmodels . A lo c al e m p irical parameter izati o n  is p o ssi ble,bu t not a para meterizati on over man y mont hs.
We c onclude  t hat fo r b ot h Pioneer1 0 and 11,  ther e are s ma ll p eri odic e rror s in so larsy ste m modelin g th a tar e  la rgel y mas ke d by  maneuver s  and bythe overall  p las m a  noise .  B u t  because t hes e sin u s oids are e s sent i al l y unc orrela ted wi th
 problem._The magnitude_of the Pioneer 10_post-fit weighted_RMS_residuals of_$\approx_0.1$ mm/s, implies_that the spacecraft_angular position on the_sky is known_to_$\le 1.0$ milliarcseconds (mas). (Pioneer 11, with $\approx 0.18$ mm/s, yields the result $\approx_1.75$_mas.) At_their_great_distances, the trajectories of the_Pioneers are not gravitationally affected_by the_Earth. (The round-trip light time is now $\sim_24_$ hours for_Pioneer 10.) This suggests that the sources of the_annual and diurnal terms are both_Earth related.

Such a_modeling_problem_arises when there are_errors in any of the parameters_of the spacecraft orientation with respect_to the chosen reference frame. Because of_these errors, the system of equations_that describes the spacecraft’s motion_in this_reference frame is under-determined and_its solution requires_non-linear estimation_techniques. In addition,_the whole estimation process is subject_to Kalman filtering_and smoothing methods. Therefore, if there_are_modeling errors in_the_Earth’s_ephemeris, the_orientation of the_Earth’s_spin axis_(precession_and nutation), or in the station_coordinates_(polar motion and length of day variations),_the least-squares process (which_determines_best-fit values of the_three direction cosines) will leave_small diurnal and annual components in_the Doppler_residuals, like_those seen in Figures \[annualresiduals\]-\[opp96\].

Orbit determination programs are particularly sensitive to_an error in a poorly observed_direction [@melbourne]. If not_corrected for,_such_an error could_in_principle significantly_affect the overall navigational accuracy. In the_case of_the Pioneer spacecraft, navigation was performed_using only Doppler tracking,_or_line-of-sight observations. The other directions, perpendicular_to the line-of-sight or in the_plane of the sky, are_poorly_constrained_by the data available. At_present, it is infeasible to precisely_parameterize the systematic_errors with a physical model. That would_have_allowed one to reduce the errors_to_a level below those from the_best_available_ephemeris and Earth orientation models._A local empirical parameterization is possible,_but not a parameterization over many months.

We conclude that_for both Pioneer_10 and 11, there are_small_periodic_errors in solar system modeling that are largely masked by_maneuvers and_by the overall_plasma noise. But because these sinusoids are essentially uncorrelated with