}
2 r a  \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ra \ll 1$}},\\
2 (r a)^{-1}  \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ra \gg 1$}}.\\
\end{cases} \label{eq:CPasym-general-formula} \end{aligned}$$ Non-perturbative effects enhance $a$ in both kaon and charm decays. This means the effect which is visible in the CP asymmetry is different depending on the value of $r$. For $r a\ll 1$ increasing $a$ results in enhancement of the CP asymmetry, while for $r a \gg 1$ it is suppressed. These two cases correspond to the charm and kaon cases, respectively. It follows that the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule in kaons reduces CP violating effects, while the $\Delta U=0$ rule in charm enhances them.

Conclusions \[sec:conclusions\]
===============================

From the recent determination of $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ we derive the ratio of $\Delta U=0$ over $\Delta U=1$ amplitudes as $$\begin{aligned}
\vert \tilde{p}_0\vert \sin(\delta_{\mathrm{strong}}) &= 0.65 \pm 0.12\,.\label{eq:mainresult-conclusion}\end{aligned}$$ In principle two options are possible in order to explain this result: In the perturbative picture beyond the SM (BSM) physics is necessary to explain Eq. (\[eq:mainresult-conclusion\]). On the other hand, in the SM picture, we find that all that is required in order to explain the result is a mild non-perturbative enhancement due to rescattering effects. Therefore, it is hard to argue that BSM physics is required.

Our interpretation of the result is that the measurement of $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ provides a proof for the $\Delta U=0$ rule in charm. The enhancement of the $\Delta U=0$ amplitude is not as significant as the one present in the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule for kaons. In the future, with more information on the strong phase of $\tilde{p}_0$ from time-dependent measurements or measurements of correlated $D^0\overline{D}^0$ decays, we will be able to completely
} 
 2 r a   \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ ra \ll 1$}},\\ 
 2 (r a)^{-1 }   \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ ra \gg 1$}}.\\ 
 \end{cases } \label{eq: CPasym - general - formula } \end{aligned}$$ Non - perturbative effect enhance $ a$ in both kaon and appeal decays. This means the effect which is visible in the CP asymmetry is unlike depending on the value of $ r$. For $ r a\ll 1 $ increasing $ a$ consequence in enhancement of the CP asymmetry, while for $ r a \gg 1 $ it is suppressed. These two casing correspond to the charm and kaon shell, respectively. It follows that the $ \Delta I=1/2 $ principle in kaon reduces CP violating effects, while the $ \Delta U=0 $ dominion in charm enhances them. 

 Conclusions \[sec: conclusions\ ] 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 From the late determination of $ \Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ we derive the ratio of $ \Delta U=0 $ over $ \Delta U=1 $ amplitude as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \vert \tilde{p}_0\vert \sin(\delta_{\mathrm{strong } }) & = 0.65 \pm 0.12\,.\label{eq: mainresult - conclusion}\end{aligned}$$ In principle two options are possible in holy order to explain this consequence: In the perturbative picture beyond the SM (BSM) physics is necessary to explain Eq.   (\[eq: mainresult - conclusion\ ]). On the other hand, in the SM mental picture, we find that all that is required in order to explain the result is a meek non - perturbative enhancement due to rescattering effects. Therefore, it is hard to argue that BSM physics is required. 

 Our interpretation of the result is that the measurement of $ \Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ provides a proof for the $ \Delta U=0 $ rule in appeal. The enhancement of the $ \Delta U=0 $ amplitude is not as significant as the one present in the $ \Delta I=1/2 $ principle for kaon. In the future, with more data on the strong phase of $ \tilde{p}_0 $ from time - dependent measurements or measurements of correlated $ D^0\overline{D}^0 $ decays, we will be able to completely
}
2 r w  \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{fov $ra \ll 1$}},\\
2 (r a)^{-1}  \siu(\eelta) \vin(\phi)&{\jbox{for $fa \gg 1$}}.\\
\end{cases} \label{eq:CPasym-jeneeal-foemula} \end{aligned}$$ Non-pefturbativv effects enhence $a$ in both kekn and gkarm sccays. Vhis means the gffect which is visible in tfe CP asymmetry is different dependind on thr galue of $r$. For $r a\kj 1$ ihbrtasing $a$ results in enhancement or the CK asymmetry, while gor $r a \gg 1$ it is suppressfd. Tjese two cases corgespond to jge syarm and kaov cases, respectively. Ij follows that the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule kn kapns reducew XP gholating efhects, rhile the $\Delta U=0$ rune in cnarm enhances bhem.

Cmncousions \[sec:conclusionv\]
===============================

From the recent dgterminatimn of $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathem{eir}}$ wg derhve gye fatjo or $\Deltw U=0$ over $\Deltz U=1$ amplituees as $$\begin{aligned}
\fewn \tilde{p}_0\vert \ain(\delea_{\iathrm{strong}}) &= 0.65 \pm 0.12\,.\label{eq:mainresult-concnusjon}\end{aligned}$$ In principle two options are plssible ig order to explain this result: In the perturbativa picvufe ycnond rhf SM (BSM) physics is necessary to explain Eq. (\[eq:izimrvsult-conclusion\]). Ok the other hand, im hhr SM picture, wg find cgaf all that is requlred in ordee to explwin yhe result is a mild non-perrurbative enkanxement due to resccttering effzcts. Tnerefpre, it is hard to argue thaf BSM physifs is reqhkred.

Our interpregatpon mf the rtrult is that the ieasuremeit of $\Delta x_{CP}^{\msthrm{dyr}}$ provided a pvmof for the $\Delta K=0$ rulg in cvarm. The ejhancement of the $\Delta U=0$ amplivnde is not as shgnpficant af the one present yn the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule fjr kauns. In the future, with more ynformation ot the strong 'hase of $\eildw{p}_0$ feom timd-aependent measirements or measurenents of correlatev $D^0\oxsrline{D}^0$ decays, ct wull be able to vomoleeepy
} 2 r a \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ra 2 a)^{-1} \sin(\delta) $ra \gg 1$}}.\\ enhance in both kaon charm decays. This the effect which is visible in CP asymmetry is different depending on the value of $r$. For $r a\ll increasing $a$ results in enhancement of the CP asymmetry, while for $r a 1$ is These cases correspond to the charm and kaon cases, respectively. It follows that the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule kaons reduces CP violating effects, while the $\Delta rule in charm enhances Conclusions \[sec:conclusions\] =============================== From the determination $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ derive ratio $\Delta U=0$ over U=1$ amplitudes as $$\begin{aligned} \vert \tilde{p}_0\vert \sin(\delta_{\mathrm{strong}}) &= 0.65 \pm 0.12\,.\label{eq:mainresult-conclusion}\end{aligned}$$ In principle two options are possible order to result: In perturbative beyond SM (BSM) physics to explain Eq. (\[eq:mainresult-conclusion\]). On the the SM picture, we find that all that required in to explain the result is a non-perturbative enhancement due to rescattering effects. Therefore, it hard to argue that BSM physics is required. Our interpretation of the result is that of $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ provides proof for the U=0$ in The of the U=0$ amplitude is not as significant as the one present in $\Delta I=1/2$ rule for kaons. In the future, with more the phase of $\tilde{p}_0$ time-dependent measurements or measurements correlated decays, we will be completely
}
2 r a  \sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ra \Ll 1$}},\\
2 (r a)^{-1}  \sin(\delTa) \sin(\Phi)&{\MboX{fOr $ra \Gg 1$}}.\\
\enD{cases} \label{eq:CpAsym-General-formula} \end{alignEd}$$ Non-PeRTurbATiVe effEcts enhANcE $A$ In bOtH kAon AnD ChArm deCayS. This meAns the effeCt wHiCh is visible iN ThE CP asymmetRy iS different dePenDing on ThE vaLUe of $r$. for $R a\ll 1$ iNcreasINg $a$ resUlts in enhAnCEment oF The CP asYMMeTry, wHile for $r a \gg 1$ it is suPPrESsed. These two caSes corReSPoND To tHe cHarm and kaoN cAses, rESpectivELy. iT FOllOWs that the $\DeltA I=1/2$ rule in kaoNS reDuces Cp vIolATing efFects, WhILe tHe $\Delta U=0$ rulE in cHarm enhanCes theM.

conclusIOns \[sec:cOnclusIonS\]
===============================

FrOm thE ReCeNt dEtERmiNAtIon OF $\DeLta a_{CP}^{\maThRm{Dir}}$ we DeriVE THE ratIo oF $\DelTa U=0$ ovEr $\Delta U=1$ ampliTudEs as $$\BEgiN{aligNed}
\veRt \tiLdE{p}_0\verT \sin(\deLta_{\maThRm{strong}}) &= 0.65 \pm 0.12\,.\label{Eq:maInresult-cOncLuSioN}\eNd{aliGNed}$$ In pRinCipLe two opTions arE PosSiBLE In Order to explain this ReSULt: in the perTurbatIVe PiCTure beyoNd The sM (BSm) PHysicS is nECeSsary to eXplain eQ. (\[eQ:mAinresuLt-ConcluSiOn\]). ON thE otheR Hand, In the Sm picture, We finD That all that is rEQuired in order TO eXPLaIN the ResUlt is a mild nOn-peRTurbAtivE EnHanCEment Due to ReSCaTTering effects. TherefOrE, it is hArd to Argue that BSM pHysics is reQUIRed.

Our inTerpREtATion of the resulT is thAt the measuREment of $\DElta a_{cP}^{\mathrm{Dir}}$ providES A proof foR thE $\DeLta u=0$ ruLE In Charm. The enhanCEMent Of The $\DeltA U=0$ aMplitudE is Not As sIgnIfIcant as thE one presEnT iN tHe $\delTa I=1/2$ ruLE for kaonS. IN thE fUtuRe, witH More inFormaTion On ThE StrOng phasE Of $\TILde{p}_0$ FrOm Time-DepEnDent mEasuREmeNts or meAsurementS of COrreLaTeD $D^0\overlIne{D}^0$ decays, we wIlL be able to cOmPleTely
}
2 r a  \sin(\delta) \sin (\phi)&{\m box{f or$ra  \ ll 1 $}}, \\
2 (r a)^{-1 }   \s in(\delta) \sin(\phi)& {\mbo x{ f or $ r a\gg 1 $}}.\\\ en d { cas es }\la be l {e q:CPa sym -genera l-formula}  \e nd {aligned}$$N on -perturbat ive  effects enh anc e $a$in  bo t h kao n a nd ch arm de c ays. T his means  t h e effe c t which i svisi ble in the CP asy m me t ry is differen t depe nd i ng o n t hevalue of $ r$ . For $r a\ll 1$ i n cre a sing $a$ resu lts in enha n cem ent of  t heC P asym metry ,w hil e for $r a\gg1$ it issuppre s sed. Th e se twocasescor res pond to  t hech a rma nd  ka o n c ases, re sp ec tivel y. I t f o llow s t hatthe $ \Delta I=1/2$  ru le i n  ka ons r educe s CP  v iolat ing ef fects ,while the $\Del ta U =0$ ruleinch arm  e nhanc e s them .
Con clusion s \[sec : con cl u s i on s\]
============== == = = == ======== ===

F r om  t h e recent  d ete rmin a t ion o f $\ D el ta a_{CP }^{\ma t hr m{ dir}}$we  deriv ethe  ra tio o f  $\D elta U =0$ over  $\De l ta U=1$ amplit u des as $$\beg i n{ a l ig n ed}\ve rt \tilde{p }_0\ v ert\sin ( \d elt a _{\ma thrm{ st r on g }}) &= 0.65 \pm 0.1 2\ ,.\lab el{eq :mainresult-c onclusion} \ e n d{aligne d}$$ In principle twooptio ns are pos s ible inorder  to expl ain thisr e sult: In  th e p ert urb a t iv e picture bey o n d th eSM (BSM ) p hysicsisnec ess ary  t o explain  Eq. (\[ eq :m ai nr esu lt-co n clusion\ ]) . O nthe  othe r  hand,  in t he S Mpi c tur e, we f i nd t hatal lthat  is  r equir ed i n  or der toexplain t her esul tis  a mild  non-perturba ti ve enhance me ntdue to r escatter ing effects. Therefore, it is h ard  to a rgue  that BSM  ph ysicsisr equire d.

Ou r int er pre t a tiono f  t here sult is th a t  th e mea su reme nt of $ \Delta a_{CP}^{\ma t hrm {dir}}$ provi des  a p r o of  fo r  t h e $ \D e lta U =0$ rule in cha rm. The en ha n ce ment of th e  $\ De lta U=0 $ ampli tudei s not a s signifi cant as t he  one p res ent in the  $\Delta  I=1/2$ r u le fo r  k aons.  In  the f ut ure , wit h more inf ormat ion on  t he str ong p ha se of $\ tilde{p}_0$ from time-d epende nt me asu rements o r m e asu rements o f co rrelated $ D^0 \ov erlin e{D } ^0$ d ecay s ,wew ill b e ab l e to comp l et ely 
}
2 r_a _\sin(\delta) \sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for $ra \ll_1$}},\\
2 (r_a)^{-1}_ \sin(\delta)_\sin(\phi)&{\mbox{for_$ra \gg 1$}}.\\
\end{cases}_\label{eq:CPasym-general-formula} \end{aligned}$$ Non-perturbative_effects enhance $a$ in_both kaon and_charm_decays. This means the effect which is visible in the CP asymmetry is different_depending_on the_value_of_$r$. For $r a\ll 1$_increasing $a$ results in enhancement_of the_CP asymmetry, while for $r a \gg 1$_it_is suppressed. These_two cases correspond to the charm and kaon cases,_respectively. It follows that the $\Delta_I=1/2$ rule in_kaons_reduces_CP violating effects, while_the $\Delta U=0$ rule in charm_enhances them.

Conclusions \[sec:conclusions\]
===============================

From the recent determination_of $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ we derive the ratio_of $\Delta U=0$ over $\Delta U=1$_amplitudes as $$\begin{aligned}
\vert \tilde{p}_0\vert \sin(\delta_{\mathrm{strong}})_&= 0.65_\pm 0.12\,.\label{eq:mainresult-conclusion}\end{aligned}$$ In principle two_options are possible_in order_to explain this_result: In the perturbative picture beyond_the SM (BSM)_physics is necessary to explain Eq. (\[eq:mainresult-conclusion\])._On_the other hand,_in_the_SM picture,_we find that_all_that is_required_in order to explain the result_is_a mild non-perturbative enhancement due to rescattering_effects. Therefore, it is_hard_to argue that BSM_physics is required.

Our interpretation of_the result is that the measurement_of $\Delta_a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ provides_a proof for the $\Delta U=0$ rule in charm. The enhancement_of the $\Delta U=0$ amplitude is_not as significant as_the one_present_in the $\Delta_I=1/2$_rule for_kaons. In the future, with more information_on the_strong phase of $\tilde{p}_0$ from time-dependent_measurements or measurements of_correlated_$D^0\overline{D}^0$ decays, we will be able_to completely