,p} &\leq &C\times
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\times t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast
})(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })}\quad with  \label{TR6'} \\
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m}) &=&\Big(\frac{1}{\lambda _{n}^{\theta _{0}(a+b)%
\mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast }}}+\overline{\Phi }_{n}^{\mathfrak{m}}(\delta
_{\ast })\Big)^{1+\varepsilon _{\ast }}  \label{TR6''}\end{aligned}$$

**C**. Let $p>2d.$ Set $\bar{%
    \mathfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1+2d/p_{\ast }}{\delta _{\ast }}$. There exist $%
C\geq 1,\eta \geq 0$ (depending on $q,p,\varepsilon _{\ast },\delta _{\ast
},\kappa $) such that for every $t>0$, $n\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and for every multi-indexes $\alpha,\beta $ such that $\left\vert \alpha \right\vert
+\left\vert \beta \right\vert \leq q$, $$\left\vert \partial _{x}^{\alpha }\partial _{y}^{\beta
}p_{t}(x,y)\right\vert \leq C\times Q_{n}(q+1,\bar{\mathfrak{m}})\times
t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\bar{\mathfrak{m}}+q+1+2d/p_{\ast })(1+\varepsilon _{\ast
    })})\times \frac{\psi _{\eta +\kappa }(x)}{\psi _{\kappa }(x-y)}
\label{TR6d}$$for every $t\in (0,1]$ and $x,y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{d}.$

We stress that in hypothesis (\[TR6a\]) the order of derivation $q$ does not appear. However the conclusions (\[TR6’\]) and (\[TR6d\]) hold for every $q.$ The motivation of this is given by the following heuristics. The hypothesis (\[TR5\]) says that the semi-group $P_{t}^{n}$ has a regularization effect controlled by $1/(\
, p } & \leq & C\times 
 Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\times t^{-\theta _ { 0}((a+b)\mathfrak{m}+q+2d / p_{\ast 
 }) (1+\varepsilon _ { \ast }) } \quad with   \label{TR6' } \\ 
 Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m }) & = & \Big(\frac{1}{\lambda _ { n}^{\theta _ { 0}(a+b)% 
 \mathfrak{m}+q+2d / p_{\ast } } } + \overline{\Phi } _ { n}^{\mathfrak{m}}(\delta 
 _ { \ast }) \Big)^{1+\varepsilon _ { \ast } }   \label{TR6''}\end{aligned}$$ 

 * * C * *. Let $ p>2d.$ Set $ \bar{% 
     \mathfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1 + 2d / p_{\ast } } { \delta _ { \ast } } $. There exist $% 
 C\geq 1,\eta \geq 0 $ (depending on $ q, p,\varepsilon _ { \ast }, \delta _ { \ast 
 }, \kappa $) such that for every $ t>0 $, $ n\in { \mathbb{N}}$ and for every multi - exponent $ \alpha,\beta $ such that $ \left\vert \alpha \right\vert 
 + \left\vert \beta \right\vert \leq q$, $ $ \left\vert \partial _ { x}^{\alpha } \partial _ { y}^{\beta 
 } p_{t}(x, y)\right\vert \leq C\times Q_{n}(q+1,\bar{\mathfrak{m}})\times 
 t^{-\theta _ { 0}((a+b)\bar{\mathfrak{m}}+q+1 + 2d / p_{\ast }) (1+\varepsilon _ { \ast 
     }) }) \times \frac{\psi _ { \eta + \kappa } (x)}{\psi _ { \kappa } (ten - y) } 
 \label{TR6d}$$for every $ t\in (0,1]$ and $ x, y\in { \mathbb{R}}^{d}.$ 

 We stress that in hypothesis (\[TR6a\ ]) the orderliness of derivation $ q$ does not appear. However the conclusion (\[TR6’\ ]) and (\[TR6d\ ]) hold for every $ q.$ The motivation of this   is given by the come heuristics. The hypothesis (\[TR5\ ]) suppose that the semi - group $ P_{t}^{n}$ has a regularization effect controlled by $ 1/(\
,p} &\lfq &C\times
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\timts t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\mathftaj{m}+q+2d/p_{\avt
})(1+\varelsilon _{\art })}\quad with  \label{TR6'} \\
Q_{n}(q,\matifraj{m}) &=&\Bit(\frac{1}{\lambda _{n}^{\theta _{0}(a+b)%
\mxthfrak{m}+q+2f/p_{\ast }}}+\ovwrliie{\Phi }_{n}^{\mathfrak{m}}(\vslta
_{\ast })\Big)^{1+\vadcpsilmi _{\ast }}  \label{TR6''}\gnd{aligned}$$

**C**. Net $p>2d.$ Set $\bar{%
    \lathfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1+2d/p_{\ast }}{\delta _{\ast }}$. Therq exist $%
C\heq 1,\eta \geq 0$ (dgpendpnd on $q,p,\varepsilon _{\ast },\delta _{\ast
},\kappa $) auch thet for every $t>0$, $m\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and for every lultl-indexes $\alpha,\beta $ such that $\lefe\cert \alpha \rkght\vert
+\left\vert \beta \tight\vert \leq q$, $$\left\vert \partial _{x}^{\alpka }\partial _{i}^{\ywta
}o_{j}(x,y)\right\vert \leq B\times Q_{n}(q+1,\bar{\mathfrak{k}})\times
t^{-\yheta _{0}((a+b)\bar{\matmfrak{k}}+q+1+2d/p_{\ast })(1+\varepsilon _{\ast
    })})\times \frac{\psi _{\etw +\kappa }(x)}{\[sn _{\kappa }(x-y)}
\label{TR6d}$$for ecery $j\in (0,1]$ dnd $b,t\in {\mauhbu{R}}^{d}.$

Se strfss that in hgpothesis (\[TE6a\]) the order of derovwnoon $q$ does nkt appqaw. However the conclusions (\[TR6’\]) and (\[TR6d\]) hond ror every $q.$ The motivatuon of this is given bi the folljwing heuristics. The hypothesis (\[TR5\]) says that the vemi-gcojp $K_{t}^{k}$ fqs a regularization effect controlled by $1/(\
,p} &\leq &C\times Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\times t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast })(1+\varepsilon with \\ Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m}) _{n}^{\theta _{0}(a+b)% \mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast }} **C**. Let $p>2d.$ $\bar{% \mathfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1+2d/p_{\ast }}{\delta }}$. There exist $% C\geq 1,\eta 0$ (depending on $q,p,\varepsilon _{\ast },\delta _{\ast },\kappa $) such that for every $n\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and for every multi-indexes $\alpha,\beta $ such that $\left\vert \alpha \right\vert \beta \leq $$\left\vert _{x}^{\alpha }\partial _{y}^{\beta }p_{t}(x,y)\right\vert \leq C\times Q_{n}(q+1,\bar{\mathfrak{m}})\times t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\bar{\mathfrak{m}}+q+1+2d/p_{\ast })(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })})\times \frac{\psi _{\eta +\kappa }(x)}{\psi }(x-y)} \label{TR6d}$$for every $t\in (0,1]$ and $x,y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{d}.$ stress that in hypothesis the order of derivation $q$ not However the (\[TR6’\]) (\[TR6d\]) for every $q.$ motivation of this is given by the following heuristics. The hypothesis (\[TR5\]) says that the semi-group $P_{t}^{n}$ a regularization by $1/(\
,p} &\leq &C\times
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\timEs t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\MathfRak{M}+q+2d/P_{\aSt
})(1+\vaRepsIlon _{\ast })}\quad witH  \LabeL{TR6'} \\
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m}) &=&\Big(\frac{1}{\LambdA _{n}^{\THeta _{0}(A+B)%
\mAthfrAk{m}+q+2d/p_{\aST }}}+\oVERliNe{\phI }_{n}^{\mAtHFrAk{m}}(\deLta
_{\Ast })\Big)^{1+\vArepsilon _{\aSt }}  \lAbEl{TR6''}\end{alignED}$$

**C**. let $p>2d.$ Set $\baR{%
    \maThfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1+2D/p_{\aSt }}{\deltA _{\aSt }}$. THEre exIst $%
c\geq 1,\eTa \geq 0$ (dEPendinG on $q,p,\varePsILon _{\ast },\DElta _{\ast
},\KAPpA $) sucH that for every $t>0$, $n\in {\MAtHBb{N}}$ and for every Multi-iNdEXeS $\ALphA,\beTa $ such that $\LeFt\verT \Alpha \riGHt\VERT
+\leFT\vert \beta \righT\vert \leq q$, $$\leFT\veRt \partIaL _{x}^{\aLPha }\parTial _{y}^{\BeTA
}p_{t}(X,y)\right\vert \Leq C\Times Q_{n}(q+1,\bAr{\mathFRak{m}})\timES
t^{-\theta _{0}((A+b)\bar{\mAthFraK{m}}+q+1+2d/P_{\AsT })(1+\vArePsILon _{\ASt
    })})\TimES \frAc{\psi _{\eta +\KaPpA }(x)}{\psi _{\KappA }(X-Y)}
\LAbel{tR6d}$$For eVery $t\In (0,1]$ and $x,y\in {\mathBb{R}}^{D}.$

We sTResS that In hypOtheSiS (\[TR6a\]) tHe ordeR of deRiVation $q$ does not aPpeaR. However tHe cOnCluSiOns (\[TR6’\]) ANd (\[TR6d\]) hOld For Every $q.$ THe motivATioN oF THIs Is given by the followInG HEuRistics. THe hypoTHeSiS (\[tR5\]) says thAt The Semi-GROup $P_{t}^{N}$ has A ReGularizaTion efFEcT cOntrollEd By $1/(\
,p} &\leq &C\times
Q_{n}(q ,\mathfrak {m})\ tim est^ {-\t heta  _{0}((a+b)\ma t hfra k{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast
})(1 +\var ep s ilon _{ \ast})}\qua d  w i t h \l ab el{ TR 6 '}  \\
Q _{n }(q,\ma thfrak{m})  &= &\ Big(\frac{1} { \l ambda _{n} ^{\ theta _{0}(a +b) %
\mat hf rak { m}+q+ 2d/ p_{\a st }}} + \overl ine{\Phi}_ { n}^{\m a thfrak{ m } }( \del ta
_{\ast })\Big) ^ {1 + \varepsilon _{ \ast } }\l a b el{ TR6 ''}\end{al ig ned}$ $ 

**C** .  L e t $p> 2 d.$ Set $\bar {%
    \mat h fra k{m}}= 1+ \fr a c{q+1+ 2d/p_ {\ a st}}{\delta _ {\as t }}$. Th ere ex i st $%
C \ geq 1,\ eta \g eq0$(dep e nd in g o n$ q,p , \v are p sil on _{\as t}, \delt a _{ \ a s t 
},\ kap pa $ ) suc h that for ev ery  $t> 0 $,$n\in  {\ma thbb {N }}$ a nd for  ever ymulti-indexes $ \alp ha,\beta$ s uc h t ha t $\l e ft\ver t \ alp ha \rig ht\vert +\l ef t \ v er t \beta \right\ver t\ l eq  q$, $$\ left\v e rt  \ p artial _ {x }^{ \alp h a  }\pa rtia l  _ {y}^{\be ta
}p_ { t} (x ,y)\rig ht \vert\l eqC\t imesQ _{n} (q+1,\ bar{\mat hfrak { m}})\times
t^{ - \theta _{0}(( a +b ) \ ba r {\ma thf rak{m}}+q+1 +2d/ p _{\a st } ) (1 +\v a repsi lon _ {\ a st     })})\times \fra c{ \psi _ {\eta  +\kappa }(x) }{\psi _{\ k a p pa }(x-y )}
\ l ab e l{TR6d}$$for e very$t\in (0,1 ] $ and $x ,y\in  {\mathb b{R}}^{d} . $ 

We str ess  th atinh y po thesis (\[TR6 a \ ]) t he  orderofderivat ion  $q $ d oes  n ot appear . Howeve rth eco ncl usion s  (\[TR6’ \] ) a nd  (\ [TR6d \ ]) hol d for  eve ry  $ q .$The mot i va t i on o fth is i s g iv en by  the fol lowingheuristic s.T he h yp ot hesis ( \[TR5\]) says  t hat the se mi -gr oup $P _ { t}^{n}$has a regularization ef f ect con tro lledby $ 1/(\
,p} &\leq_&C\times
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})\times t^{-\theta__{0}((a+b)\mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast
})(1+\varepsilon _{\ast })}\quad with_ \label{TR6'}_\\
Q_{n}(q,\mathfrak{m})_&=&\Big(\frac{1}{\lambda _{n}^{\theta__{0}(a+b)%
\mathfrak{m}+q+2d/p_{\ast_}}}+\overline{\Phi }_{n}^{\mathfrak{m}}(\delta
_{\ast })\Big)^{1+\varepsilon__{\ast }} _\label{TR6''}\end{aligned}$$

**C**. Let $p>2d.$ Set_$\bar{%
  __\mathfrak{m}}=1+\frac{q+1+2d/p_{\ast }}{\delta _{\ast }}$. There exist $%
C\geq 1,\eta \geq 0$ (depending on $q,p,\varepsilon _{\ast_},\delta__{\ast
},\kappa $)_such_that_for every $t>0$, $n\in {\mathbb{N}}$_and for every multi-indexes $\alpha,\beta_$ such_that $\left\vert \alpha \right\vert
+\left\vert \beta \right\vert \leq q$,_$$\left\vert_\partial _{x}^{\alpha }\partial__{y}^{\beta
}p_{t}(x,y)\right\vert \leq C\times Q_{n}(q+1,\bar{\mathfrak{m}})\times
t^{-\theta _{0}((a+b)\bar{\mathfrak{m}}+q+1+2d/p_{\ast })(1+\varepsilon _{\ast
  _ })})\times \frac{\psi _{\eta +\kappa }(x)}{\psi__{\kappa }(x-y)}
\label{TR6d}$$for every_$t\in_(0,1]$_and $x,y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{d}.$

We stress_that in hypothesis (\[TR6a\]) the order_of derivation $q$ does not appear._However the conclusions (\[TR6’\]) and (\[TR6d\]) hold_for every $q.$ The motivation of_this is given by the following_heuristics. The_hypothesis (\[TR5\]) says that the_semi-group $P_{t}^{n}$ has_a regularization_effect controlled by_$1/(\