.512 s$, $Threshold = 4$

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Impact of Wi-Fi on LTE-U during the ON period {#s1}
---------------------------------------------

In order to observe the impact of Wi-Fi on LTE-U during the ON period (*i.e.,* LTE-U is ON without appropriate sensing of a Wi-Fi transmission), we deploy a NI based LTE-U BS (Section V describes the experiment set-up in detail) on channel 165 which is a 20 MHz channel and five Wi-Fi APs on the same channel. Each client is associated with one Wi-Fi AP with full buffer video transmission. Fig. \[lteu1\] (a) shows the constellation of received signals when there is no Wi-Fi AP on the channel, that is, LTE-U BS can transmit the data with high modulation coding scheme of 64-QAM. Similarly, Fig. \[lteu1\] (b) shows the energy value observed when there are 5 Wi-Fi APs on the same channel, where X-axis represents time and Y-axis represents energy values. Fig. \[lteu1\] (c) shows the effect of Wi-Fi transmissions on LTE-U during the ON period, when Wi-Fi APs are unaware of the sudden LTE-U ON cycle starting in the middle of an ongoing Wi-Fi transmission: clearly the constellation is distorted. This clearly points to the inefficient use of the spectrum and the need for the LTE-U BS to sense or learn the medium to identify the number of Wi-Fi APs on the air and scale back its duty cycle accordingly.

![LTE-U Impact on Wi-Fi Transmission.[]{data-label="wifi12"}](LTE-impact-on-WIFI.png){width="\linewidth"}

Impact of LTE-U ON transmission on Wi-Fi Data {#s2}
---------------------------------------------

In case of Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence where 5 Wi-Fi APs are deployed at the distance of 6F, we observe successful transmission of packets as shown in Fig. \[wifi12\] (a) and (b). We see that the CSMA mechanism works well for Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence, since the number of packets in error with no LTE-U is similar that when Wi-Fi coexists with Wi-Fi. Fig \[wifi12
.512 s$, $ Threshold = 4 $ 

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 Impact of Wi - Fi on LTE - U during the ON period { # s1 } 
 --------------------------------------------- 

 In order to observe the impingement of Wi - Fi on LTE - U during the ON time period (* i.e., * LTE - U is ON without appropriate sensing of a Wi - Fi transmission), we deploy a NI based LTE - U BS (department   V describes the experiment stage set - up in detail) on channel 165 which is a 20 megahertz distribution channel and five Wi - Fi APs on the same distribution channel. Each client is associated with one Wi - Fi AP with wide buffer video transmission. Fig.   \[lteu1\ ] (a) shows the constellation of meet signals when there is no Wi - Fi AP on the channel, that is, LTE - U BS can air the data with high modulation code scheme of 64 - QAM. Similarly, Fig.   \[lteu1\ ] (b) shows the energy value observed when there are 5 Wi - Fi APs on the like channel, where X - axis represents time and Y - bloc represent energy values. Fig.   \[lteu1\ ] (c) shows the effect of Wi - Fi transmissions on LTE - U during the ON period, when Wi - Fi APs are unaware of the sudden LTE - U ON cycle starting in the center of an ongoing Wi - Fi transmittance: clearly the configuration is contort. This distinctly points to the inefficient habit of the spectrum and the need for the LTE - U BS to sense or learn the medium to name the number of Wi - Fi APs on the air and scale back its duty cycle accordingly. 

! [ LTE - U Impact on Wi - Fi Transmission.[]{data - label="wifi12"}](LTE - impact - on - WIFI.png){width="\linewidth " } 

 Impact of LTE - U ON transmission on Wi - Fi Data { # s2 } 
 --------------------------------------------- 

 In case of Wi - Fi / Wi - Fi coexistence where 5 Wi - Fi APs are deployed at the distance of 6F, we observe successful transmission of packets as shown in Fig.   \[wifi12\ ] (a) and (b-complex vitamin). We interpret that the CSMA mechanism works well for Wi - Fi / Wi - Fi coexistence, since the number of packets in error with no LTE - U is similar that when Wi - Fi coexists with Wi - Fi. Fig   \[wifi12
.512 s$, $Hhreshold = 4$

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Impact of Wi-Fl on LTE-U during the ON perios {#s1}
---------------------------------------------

In oraer to observe the impact of Wu-Fi ob LTE-U during the ON pdriod (*i.e.,* PTE-U is IN wmthout appropriavs sensiky of z Wi-Fn vransmission), we deploy a TI based LTE-U TS (Szction V describes the experiment set-tp in drtwil) on channel 165 whpcr is a 20 MHz channel and five Wi-Fi APs kn the vame channel. Rach client is associated aith one Wi-Fi AP with vull buffer vidqi transmissiun. Fig. \[lteu1\] (a) shows the constellation of received signxls wken there iw bo Ah-Fi AP on tie chagnel, that is, LTE-U BS can trsnsmit the dats wmth yigh modulation codinj scheme of 64-QAM. Simijarly, Fig. \[ntzu1\] (b) shows the energy vqlue mbsesved qhev tgece zre 5 Wl-Fi APs on ths same chanbel, where X-axis reptefvmts time and Y-axis rqpresents energy values. Fig. \[lteu1\] (c) shows ths effect of Wi-Fi transmussions on LTE-U durinh the ON [eriod, when Wi-Fi APs are unaware of the sudden LTA-U ON zycoe rragting in the middle of an ongoing Wi-Fi transmyasook: clearly the cokstellation is disyogtrq. This clearli points tk the inefficient kse of jhe spwctrum anq thr need for the LTE-U BS to swnse or learu tye medium to identnfy the numbzr of Ei-Fi SPs on the air and scalz back its duty cjcle accodaingly.

![LTE-U Impacg ok Wh-Fi Transmission.[]{data-label="wyfi12"}](LTE-impect-on-CIFI.png){wkdth="\kinewiqth"}

Impact lf LTC-G ON transmission ln Wi-Yi Dada {#s2}
---------------------------------------------

In casf of Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence where 5 Wi-Fi APs are daplmyed at che dixtance of 6F, wq observe succgssful trcnsmisrion of pabkets as vhown in Fid. \[wifi12\] (a) and (b). Ae see that vhe CSMA iechqnisn works dell for Wi-Fi/Wo-Fi coexistence, sinxe the number of peckejs in error with uu LTE-U is similat tfat wjei Wi-Fy coexists widh Wk-Fi. Gig \[wiwi12
.512 s$, $Threshold = 4$ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Impact on during the period {#s1} --------------------------------------------- impact Wi-Fi on LTE-U the ON period LTE-U is ON without appropriate sensing a Wi-Fi transmission), we deploy a NI based LTE-U BS (Section V describes experiment set-up in detail) on channel 165 which is a 20 MHz channel five APs the channel. Each client is associated with one Wi-Fi AP with full buffer video transmission. Fig. \[lteu1\] shows the constellation of received signals when there no Wi-Fi AP on channel, that is, LTE-U BS transmit data with modulation scheme 64-QAM. Similarly, Fig. (b) shows the energy value observed when there are 5 Wi-Fi APs on the same channel, where represents time represents energy Fig. (c) the effect of on LTE-U during the ON period, are unaware of the sudden LTE-U ON cycle in the of an ongoing Wi-Fi transmission: clearly constellation is distorted. This clearly points to the use of the spectrum and the need for the LTE-U BS to sense or learn to identify the number Wi-Fi APs on air scale its cycle accordingly. Impact on Wi-Fi Transmission.[]{data-label="wifi12"}](LTE-impact-on-WIFI.png){width="\linewidth"} Impact of LTE-U ON transmission on Wi-Fi {#s2} --------------------------------------------- In case of Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence where 5 Wi-Fi deployed the distance of we observe successful transmission packets shown in Fig. \[wifi12\] (b). see mechanism well Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence, since the of packets in error with LTE-U is similar that Fig \[wifi12
.512 s$, $Threshold = 4$

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Impact of Wi-Fi on LtE-U during tHe ON pEriOd {#s1}
---------------------------------------------

in OrdeR to oBserve the impacT Of Wi-fi on LTE-U during the ON perIod (*i.e.,* lTe-u is On WiThout ApproprIAtE SEnsInG oF a WI-FI TrAnsmiSsiOn), we depLoy a NI baseD LTe-U bS (Section V deSCrIbes the expEriMent set-up in dEtaIl) on chAnNel 165 WHich iS a 20 Mhz chaNnel anD Five Wi-fi APs on thE sAMe chanNEl. Each cLIEnT is aSsociated with one WI-fi ap with full buffeR video TrANsMISsiOn. FIg. \[lteu1\] (a) shoWs The coNStellatIOn OF REceIVed signals wheN there is no WI-fi Ap on the ChAnnEL, that iS, LTE-U bS CAn tRansmit the dAta wIth high moDulatiON coding SCheme of 64-qAM. SimIlaRly, fig. \[lTEu1\] (B) sHowS tHE enERgY vaLUe oBserved wHeN tHere aRe 5 Wi-fI apS on tHe sAme cHanneL, where X-axis rePreSentS TimE and Y-Axis rEpreSeNts enErgy vaLues. FIg. \[Lteu1\] (c) shows the efFect Of Wi-Fi traNsmIsSioNs On LTE-u During The oN pEriod, whEn Wi-Fi ApS arE uNAWArE of the sudden LTE-U ON CyCLE sTarting iN the miDDlE oF An ongoinG WI-Fi TranSMIssioN: cleARlY the consTellatIOn Is DistortEd. this clEaRly PoiNts to THe inEfficiEnt use of The spECtrum and the neeD For the LTE-U BS tO SeNSE oR LearN thE medium to idEntiFY the NumbER oF Wi-fI APs oN the aIr ANd SCale back its duty cyclE aCcordiNgly.

![LtE-U Impact on Wi-fi TransmisSION.[]{data-labEl="wiFI12"}](Lte-impact-on-WIFI.pNg){widTh="\linewidtH"}

impact of lTE-U On transmiSsion on Wi-fI data {#s2}
---------------------------------------------

In cAse Of WI-Fi/wi-FI COeXistence where 5 wI-fi APS aRe deploYed At the diStaNce Of 6F, We oBsErve succeSsful traNsMiSsIoN of PackeTS as shown In fig. \[WiFi12\] (a) And (b). WE See thaT the CsMA mEcHaNIsm Works weLL fOR wi-Fi/wi-fi CoexIstEnCe, sinCe thE NumBer of paCkets in erRor WIth nO LtE-u is simiLar that when Wi-fi Coexists wiTh wi-FI. Fig \[wiFI12
.512 s$, $Threshold = 4$
---------- ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- -------------- - ---- ---------------------- 

Imp ac t  ofW i- Fi on  LTE-Ud ur i n g t he  O N p er i od  {#s1 }
- ------- ---------- --- -- ------------ - -- -------

I n o rder to obse rve  the i mp act of Wi -Fi  on L TE-U d u ring t he ON per io d  (*i.e . ,* LTE- U is  ONwithout appropria t es ensing of a Wi -Fi tr an s mi s s ion ),we deployaNI ba s ed LTE- U  B S ( Sec t ion V describ es the expe r ime nt set -u p i n  detai l) on  c h ann el 165 whic h is  a 20 MHz  chann e l and f i ve Wi-F i APsonthe  sam e  c ha nne l. Eac h  c lie n t i s associ at ed  with  one W i - Fi A P w ithfullbuffer videotra nsmi s sio n. Fi g. \[ lteu 1\ ] (a)  shows  theco nstellation ofrece ived sign als  w hen  t herei s no W i-F i A P on th e chann e l,th a t is , LTE-U BS can tra ns m i tthe data  withh ig hm odulatio ncod ings c hemeof 6 4 -Q AM. Simi larly, Fi g.  \[lteu 1\ ] (b)sh ows  th e ene r gy v alue o bservedwhent here are 5 Wi- F i APs on thes am e ch a nnel , w here X-axis  rep r esen ts t i me  an d  Y-ax is re pr e se n ts energy values. F ig . \[lt eu1\]  (c) shows th e effect o f W i-Fi tra nsmi s si o ns on LTE-U du ringthe ON per i od, when  Wi-F i APs ar e unaware o f the su dde n L TE- U O N cy cle startingi n  the  m iddle o f a n ongoi ngWi- Fitra ns mission:clearlyth eco ns tel latio n  is dist or ted .Thi s cle a rly po intsto t he  i n eff icientu se o f th esp ectr uman d the  nee d  fo r the L TE-U BS t o s e nseor  l earn th e medium to i de ntify thenu mbe r of W i - Fi APs o n the air and scale bac k  its du tycycle  acc ordingly. 

! [LTE-U  Im p act on  Wi-Fi  Tran sm iss i o n.[]{ d a ta -la be l="wifi12" } ] (LT E-imp ac t-on -WIFI.p ng){width="\linewi d th" }

Impact ofLTE -U O N tr ans m is s ion  o n  Wi - F i Data {#s2}
-- ---------- -- - -- ---------- - --- -- ------- -----
In ca s e of Wi -Fi/Wi-Fi  coexiste nc e wh e r e 5  Wi-Fi APs  are dep loyed att he di s ta nce o f 6 F, weob ser ve su ccessf u l t ransm ission  o f pack ets a sshown in  Fig. \[wifi12\] (a) an d (b).  We s eethat theCSM A  me chanism w orks  well forWi- Fi/ Wi-Fi  co e xiste nce, si nce the n umbe r  of packe t sine r ro r with no L T E - U i s sim ila r  thatwhen  Wi-Fi coexists w i th Wi-Fi. Fig\[wi f i 12
.512 s$,_$Threshold =_4$

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Impact of Wi-Fi on_LTE-U during_the_ON period_{#s1}
---------------------------------------------

In_order to observe_the impact of_Wi-Fi on LTE-U during_the ON period_(*i.e.,*_LTE-U is ON without appropriate sensing of a Wi-Fi transmission), we deploy a NI_based_LTE-U BS_(Section V_describes_the experiment set-up in detail)_on channel 165 which is_a 20_MHz channel and five Wi-Fi APs on the_same_channel. Each client_is associated with one Wi-Fi AP with full buffer_video transmission. Fig. \[lteu1\] (a) shows the_constellation of received_signals_when_there is no Wi-Fi_AP on the channel, that is,_LTE-U BS can transmit the data_with high modulation coding scheme of 64-QAM._Similarly, Fig. \[lteu1\] (b) shows the energy_value observed when there are_5 Wi-Fi_APs on the same channel,_where X-axis represents_time and_Y-axis represents energy_values. Fig. \[lteu1\] (c) shows the effect_of Wi-Fi transmissions_on LTE-U during the ON period,_when_Wi-Fi APs are_unaware_of_the sudden_LTE-U ON cycle_starting_in the_middle_of an ongoing Wi-Fi transmission: clearly_the_constellation is distorted. This clearly points to_the inefficient use of_the_spectrum and the need_for the LTE-U BS to_sense or learn the medium to_identify the_number of_Wi-Fi APs on the air and scale back its duty cycle_accordingly.

![LTE-U Impact on Wi-Fi Transmission.[]{data-label="wifi12"}](LTE-impact-on-WIFI.png){width="\linewidth"}

Impact of_LTE-U ON transmission on_Wi-Fi Data_{#s2}
---------------------------------------------

In_case of Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi_coexistence_where 5_Wi-Fi APs are deployed at the distance_of 6F,_we observe successful transmission of packets_as shown in Fig. \[wifi12\]_(a)_and (b). We see that the_CSMA mechanism works well for Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi_coexistence, since the number of_packets_in_error with no LTE-U is_similar that when Wi-Fi coexists with_Wi-Fi. Fig \[wifi12