ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
{.}$$ Similar relations for the self-energy and vertex can be obtained from the SDE [(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, the parquet equation [(\[eq:parquet\])]{}, and the BSEs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{}. The number of diagrams in the bare vertex is ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}=\delta_{n,1}$ (one can also take any ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \propto \delta_{n,1}$). From the SDE [(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, we get for the self-energy $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma} = {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
+ \tfrac{1}{2}\,
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
{.}\label{eq:diagr_count_sd}\end{aligned}$$ Note that, when counting diagrams, we can ignore the extra minus signs but must keep track of prefactors of magnitude not equal to unity. These prefactors avoid double counting of the antisymmetric vertex [@Bickers2004] and originate from the way the diagrams are constructed [^4]. Concerning the full vertex, we can use that the symmetry relation between the $a$ and $t$ bubble given in [Eq. (\[eq:a\_t\_sym\])]{} holds for the full reducible vertices $\gamma_{a}$ and $\gamma_{t}$ [@Bickers2004], such that ${\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{a}}={\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{t}}$. In the parquet approximation $R=\Gamma^0$, and the parquet equation [(\[eq:parquet\])]{} and the BSEs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{} yield

$$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma} 
& = 
{\mathcal{N}}_{R} + 2\, {\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_a} + {\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_p
ast { \mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } 
 { .}$$ Similar relations for the self - energy and vertex can be obtained from the SDE [ (\[eq: SchwingerDyson\ ]) ] { }, the parquet equality [ (\[eq: parquet\ ]) ] { }, and the bovine spongiform encephalitis [ (\[eq: BetheSalpeter\ ]) ] { }. The number of diagrams in the unsheathed vertex is $ { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}=\delta_{n,1}$ (one can besides take any $ { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0 } \propto \delta_{n,1}$). From the SDE [ (\[eq: SchwingerDyson\ ]) ] { }, we get for the self - energy $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma } = { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0 } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } 
 + \tfrac{1}{2}\, 
 { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0 } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } \ast { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma{^{\vphantom{(6) } } } } 
 { .}\label{eq: diagr_count_sd}\end{aligned}$$ notice that, when count diagram, we can dismiss the extra minus signal but must keep track of prefactors of magnitude not equal to unity. These prefactors avoid bivalent counting of the antisymmetric vertex [ @Bickers2004 ] and originate from the way the diagrams are manufacture [ ^4 ]. Concerning the full vertex, we can practice that the symmetry relative between the $ a$ and $ t$ bubble give in [ Eq.   (\[eq: a\_t\_sym\ ]) ] { } holds for the full reducible vertices $ \gamma_{a}$ and $ \gamma_{t}$ [ @Bickers2004 ], such that $ { \mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{a}}={\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{t}}$. In the parquet approximation $ R=\Gamma^0 $, and the parquet equality [ (\[eq: parquet\ ]) ] { } and the BSEs [ (\[eq: BetheSalpeter\ ]) ] { } yield 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma } 
 & = 
 { \mathcal{N}}_{R } + 2\, { \mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_a } + { \mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_p
ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \art {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphcbtom{(6)}}}}
{.}$$ Smmilar delationr for the self-energy and vervex xan bt obtained from the SDE [(\[eq:ScjwingerDtson\])]{}, rhe parquev equation [(\[eq:pzvquet\])]{}, end the BSEs [(\[eq:NetheSalpetar\])]{}. The number mf dnagrams in the bare vertex is ${\mathcaj{N}}_{\Gamma^0}=\cepta_{n,1}$ (one can ajso uakq ang ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \propto \delta_{n,1}$). From the SDT [(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, we get for the self-energy $$\begln{aligned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Slgma} = {\mathcql{N}}_{\Gwnma^0} \ast {\mathzal{N}}_{G{^{\vphanuok{(6)}}}}
+ \tfrac{1}{2}\,
{\matgcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantoo{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\cpyanhmm{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathral{N}}_{G{^{\vihantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gdmma{^{\vphsntom{(6)}}}}
{.}\label{eq:disgr_rounr_sd}\end{aligned}$$ Note thet, when counting diadrams, we wau ignore the extra mibuw sigts bgt mjwt yeek tcaci of pgefectors of mzgnitude nor equal to unity. Thtse itefactors avkid dotbje counting of the antisymmetric vertex [@Bidkers2004] and originate fron the way the diagramd are conftructed [^4]. Concerning the full vertex, we can use tvat tie synmctry eepation between the $a$ and $t$ bubble given in [Eq. (\[qs:a\_u\_syk\])]{} holds for thc full reducible vrrhivgs $\gamma_{a}$ and $\eamma_{t}$ [@Bidkers2004], such that ${\mahhcal{N}}_{\gwmma_{a}}={\nathcal{N}}_{\gwmma_{y}}$. In the parquet approximatuon $R=\Gamma^0$, aud rhe parquet equatiln [(\[eq:parquec\])]{} and jhe BSRs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{} yielb

$$\begin{zligned}
{\mathfal{N}}_{\Gamma} 
& = 
{\mathcal{N}}_{R} + 2\, {\maghcsl{T}}_{\gamma_a} + {\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_p
ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} {.}$$ Similar relations self-energy vertex can obtained from the [(\[eq:parquet\])]{}, the BSEs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{}. number of diagrams the bare vertex is ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}=\delta_{n,1}$ (one also take any ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \propto \delta_{n,1}$). From the SDE [(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, we get for self-energy $$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma} = {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} + \tfrac{1}{2}\, {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast \ast \ast {.}\label{eq:diagr_count_sd}\end{aligned}$$ that, when counting diagrams, we can ignore the extra minus signs but must keep track of of magnitude not equal to unity. These prefactors double counting of the vertex [@Bickers2004] and originate from way diagrams are [^4]. the vertex, we can that the symmetry relation between the $a$ and $t$ bubble given in [Eq. (\[eq:a\_t\_sym\])]{} holds for the reducible vertices $\gamma_{t}$ [@Bickers2004], that In parquet approximation $R=\Gamma^0$, parquet equation [(\[eq:parquet\])]{} and the BSEs {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma} & = {\mathcal{N}}_{R} + 2\, {\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_a} +
ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \aSt {\mathcal{N}}_{g{^{\vphaNtoM{(6)}}}}
{.}$$ SiMiLar rElatIons for the self-ENergY and vertex can be obtaineD from ThE sDE [(\[eQ:scHwingErDyson\])]{}, THe PARquEt EqUatIoN [(\[Eq:ParquEt\])]{}, aNd the BSes [(\[eq:BetheSAlpEtEr\])]{}. The number oF DiAgrams in thE baRe vertex is ${\maThcAl{N}}_{\GamMa^0}=\DelTA_{n,1}$ (one Can Also tAke any ${\MAthcal{n}}_{\Gamma^0} \proPtO \Delta_{n,1}$). fRom the Sde [(\[Eq:schwIngerDyson\])]{}, we get foR ThE Self-energy $$\begiN{alignEd}
{\MAtHCAl{N}}_{\sigMa} = {\mathcal{N}}_{\gaMma^0} \asT {\Mathcal{n}}_{g{^{\vPHANtoM{(6)}}}}
+ \Tfrac{1}{2}\,
{\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma^0} \ast {\matHCal{n}}_{G{^{\vphaNtOm{(6)}}}} \aST {\mathcAl{N}}_{G{^{\vPhANtoM{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{n}}_{G{^{\vpHantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\MathcaL{n}}_{\Gamma{^{\vPHantom{(6)}}}}
{.}\lAbel{eq:DiaGr_cOunt_SD}\eNd{AliGnED}$$ NoTE tHat, WHen Counting DiAgRams, wE can IGNORe thE exTra mInus sIgns but must keEp tRack OF prEfactOrs of MagnItUde noT equal To uniTy. these prefactors AvoiD double coUntInG of ThE antiSYmmetrIc vErtEx [@BickeRs2004] and orIGinAtE FROm The way the diagrams aRe CONsTructed [^4]. COncernINg ThE Full vertEx, We cAn usE THat thE symMEtRy relatiOn betwEEn ThE $a$ and $t$ bUbBle givEn In [EQ. (\[eq:A\_t\_sym\])]{} HOlds For the Full reduCible VErtices $\gamma_{a}$ aND $\gamma_{t}$ [@BickerS2004], SuCH ThAT ${\matHcaL{N}}_{\gamma_{a}}={\matHcal{n}}_{\GammA_{t}}$. In THe ParQUet apProxiMaTIoN $r=\Gamma^0$, and the parquet EqUation [(\[Eq:parQuet\])]{} and the BSES [(\[eq:BetheSaLPETer\])]{} yield

$$\BegiN{AlIGned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\GaMma} 
& = 
{\maThcal{N}}_{R} + 2\, {\matHCal{N}}_{\gammA_a} + {\matHcal{N}}_{\gamMa_p
ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{ ^{\vphanto m{(6) }}} } \ as t {\ math cal{N}}_{G{^{\ v phan tom{(6)}}}}
{.}$$ Simi lar r el a tion s  f or th e self- e ne r g y a nd  v ert ex ca n beobt ained f rom the SD E [ (\ [eq:Schwinge r Dy son\])]{},  th e parquet eq uat ion [( \[ eq: p arque t\] )]{},  and t h e BSEs  [(\[eq:B et h eSalpe t er\])]{ } .  T he n umber of diagrams in the bare verte x is $ {\ m at h c al{ N}} _{\Gamma^0 }= \delt a _{n,1}$ (o n e can also take any  ${\mathcal { N}} _{\Gam ma ^0} \propt o \de lt a _{n ,1}$). From  the  SDE [(\[ eq:Sch w ingerDy s on\])]{ }, weget  fo r th e  s el f-e ne r gy$ $\ beg i n{a ligned}{\ ma thcal {N}} _ { \ S igma } =  {\m athca l{N}}_{\Gamma ^0}  \as t  {\ mathc al{N} }_{G {^ {\vph antom{ (6)}} }} 
+ \tfrac{1}{2} \,
{ \mathcal{ N}} _{ \Ga mm a^0}\ ast {\ mat hca l{N}}_{ G{^{\vp h ant om { ( 6 )} }}} \ast {\mathcal {N } } _{ G{^{\vph antom{ ( 6) }} } } \ast { \m ath cal{ N } }_{G{ ^{\v p ha ntom{(6) }}}} \ a st  { \mathca l{ N}}_{\ Ga mma {^{ \vpha n tom{ (6)}}} }
{.}\la bel{e q :diagr_count_s d }\end{aligned } $$ N ot e  tha t,when counti ng d i agra ms,w ecan ignor e the  e x tr a  minus signs but mu st  keeptrack  of prefactor s of magni t u d e not eq ualt ou nity. These pr efact ors avoidd ouble co untin g of the  antisymm e t ric vert ex[@B ick ers 2 0 04 ] and origina t e  fro mthe way  th e diagr ams  ar e c ons tr ucted [^4 ]. Conce rn in gth e f ull v e rtex, we  c anus e t hat t h e symm etryrela ti on bet ween th e  $ a $  and  $ t$  bub ble  g ivenin [ E q.(\[eq:a \_t\_sym\ ])] { } ho ld sfor the  full reducib le  vertices$\ gam ma_{a} $ and $\ga mma_{t}$ [@Bickers2004] ,  such t hat  ${\m athc al{N}}_{\ gam ma_{a} }={ \ mathca l{N}}_ {\gam ma _{t } } $. In t he  pa rq uet approx i m ati on $R =\ Gamm a^0$, a nd the parquet equ a tio n [(\[eq:parq uet \])] { }  a ndt he BSE s[ (\[ e q :BetheSalpeter\ ])]{} yiel d$$ \begin{ali g ned }{\mathc al{N}}_ {\Gam m a} 
& =  
{\mathc al{N}}_{R }+ 2\ , {\m athcal{N}} _{\gamma _a} + {\m a thcal { N} }_{\g amm a_p
ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}_\ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
{.}$$_Similar relations for the_self-energy and_vertex_can be_obtained_from the SDE_[(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, the parquet_equation [(\[eq:parquet\])]{}, and the_BSEs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{}. The_number_of diagrams in the bare vertex is ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}=\delta_{n,1}$ (one can also take any ${\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}_\propto_\delta_{n,1}$). From_the_SDE_[(\[eq:SchwingerDyson\])]{}, we get for the_self-energy $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Sigma} = {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0} \ast_{\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
+ \tfrac{1}{2}\,
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma^0}_\ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{G{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}} \ast {\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma{^{\vphantom{(6)}}}}
{.}\label{eq:diagr_count_sd}\end{aligned}$$_Note_that, when counting_diagrams, we can ignore the extra minus signs but_must keep track of prefactors of_magnitude not equal_to_unity._These prefactors avoid double_counting of the antisymmetric vertex [@Bickers2004]_and originate from the way the_diagrams are constructed [^4]. Concerning the full_vertex, we can use that the_symmetry relation between the $a$_and $t$_bubble given in [Eq. (\[eq:a\_t\_sym\])]{} holds_for the full_reducible vertices_$\gamma_{a}$ and $\gamma_{t}$_[@Bickers2004], such that ${\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{a}}={\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_{t}}$. In the_parquet approximation $R=\Gamma^0$,_and the parquet equation [(\[eq:parquet\])]{} and_the_BSEs [(\[eq:BetheSalpeter\])]{} yield

$$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{N}}_{\Gamma}_
&_=_
{\mathcal{N}}_{R} +_2\, {\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_a} +_{\mathcal{N}}_{\gamma_p