 to use particular ML methods. This limits a thorough investigation of the designed ML pipelines as we might miss a few details on how some hyper-parameters were optimized. Future comparative works can focus on the top performing methods and conduct a more detailed analysis of their inner engineering steps. This will allow to identify the most reproducible and reliable diagnostic ML pipeline for a more focused clinical research. For this reseason, we made the source codes of all teams available on GitHub[^3]. Note that this Kaggle challenge was restricted to a few number of participants (a classroom), in a future work, we can organize a public challenge as part of an international conference or workshop. As such, we should provide a larger dataset to better cover the heterogeneity of autism [@geschwind2007autism; @hull2017resting].

Conclusion
==========

Designing accurate and reproducible machine learning frameworks for autistic spectrum disorder diagnosis using brain networks remains highly challenging due to its heterogeneity. A vast number of studies conducted in neuroimaging involving non-invasive brain imaging modalities such as functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI) for diagnosis. However, morphological brain connectivity derived merely from structural T1-w MRI was used seldom, despite the novel insights it might provide about ASD and how it affects the brain *connectional morphology*. In this study, we exploited crowdsourcing by organizing an in-class Kaggle challenge to fill the gap in the utilization of cortical morphological networks for the diagnosis of ASD. The participants were encouraged to develop their innovative model pipelines as a result of collaboration of their teams. Our competition enabled benchmarking a large number of machine learning methods comprising connectomic data preprocessing and classification steps. Although the training data is *small* and *high-dimensional*, the best performing team (team-1) achieved 0.7, 0.725, and 0.675, and the second team (team-2) achieved 0.638, 0.625, and 0.650 accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity scores, respectively. This demonstrates the discriminative potential that CMNs hold in diagnosing autism. In future large-scale challenges, we can leverage multi-modal brain networks including functional, structural, and morphological networks to design new ML frameworks that can handle multimodal datasets and investigate the relationship between those networks and how they are altered by autism. The designed frameworks in this challenge are generic and can be used for neurological disorder diagnosis using uni-modal (i.e., single type) brain networks. We refer interested readers to our
to use particular ML methods. This limits a exhaustive probe of the design ML pipelines as we might miss a few detail on how some hyper - parameters were optimized. Future relative works can focus on the top performing method and conduct a more detailed analysis of their inside engineering steps. This will allow to identify the about reproducible and reliable diagnostic ML pipeline for a more focused clinical inquiry. For this reseason, we made the informant codes of all teams available on GitHub[^3 ]. Note that this Kaggle challenge was restricted to a few issue of participants (a classroom), in a future work, we can organize a public challenge as part of an external conference or workshop. As such, we should put up a larger dataset to better cover the heterogeneity of autism [ @geschwind2007autism; @hull2017resting ]. 

 Conclusion 
 = = = = = = = = = = 

 design accurate and reproducible machine learning frameworks for autistic spectrum disorder diagnosis using mind networks remains highly challenging due to its heterogeneity. A vast number of studies conducted in neuroimaging involving non - invasive brain imagination modality such as functional MRI (fMRI) and dispersion MRI (dMRI) for diagnosis. However, morphologic brain connectivity derived merely from structural T1 - w MRI was use rarely, despite the novel insights it might provide about ASD and how it affects the mind * connectional morphology *. In this study, we exploited crowdsourcing by organizing an in - class Kaggle challenge to fill the gap in the utilization of cortical morphological networks for the diagnosis of ASD. The participants were encouraged to modernize their innovative exemplar pipelines as a result of collaboration of their teams. Our competition enabled benchmarking a big number of machine learning method comprising connectomic data preprocessing and classification steps. Although the education data is * small * and * high - dimensional *, the best performing team (team-1) achieved 0.7, 0.725, and 0.675, and the second team (team-2) achieve 0.638, 0.625, and 0.650 accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity scores, respectively. This demonstrates the discriminative potential that CMNs hold in diagnose autism. In future large - plate challenges, we can leverage multi - modal brain networks admit functional, morphologic, and morphological networks to design new ML frameworks that can handle multimodal datasets and investigate the relationship between those networks and how they are altered by autism. The plan frameworks in this challenge are generic and can be used for neurological disorderliness diagnosis using uni - modal (i.e., single type) brain networks. We refer interested reader to our
 to use particular ML methoas. This limits c thorongh invsstigatiun of the designed ML pipeliies qs we might miss a few detakls on hoa some htper-karameters were o'fimized. Futurs com'acative works cak focus on dhe top perforkivg methods and conduct a more detaileq analyxid of their inngr enbyneedpnn steps. This will allow to identjfy the most reproduvible and reliable diagnoshic LL pipeline for a lore focusee clybical researzh. For this reseason, wg made the source codes of all tdams cvailable ob TitJob[^3]. Note that this Kaggle challenge wav restrocted to a few nukbee of participants (a cnassroom), in a futute work, we ccn organize a public xhqllence av pafr ow ah mntsrnatilnam conferende or worksyop. As such, we shoukd itovide a larfer daeafet to better cover the heterogeneity ox ahtism [@geschwind2007autism; @hyll2017resting].

Conclusion
==========

Dgsigning ascurate and reproducible machine learning framewosks fkf abblstiz soectrum disorder diagnosis using brain networha tekains highly cmallenging due to otd ngterogeneity. A vast uhmger of studies confucted yn neyroimagind infolving non-invasive brain inaging modalptiew such as functioncl MRI (fMRI) cnd digfusipn MRI (dMRI) for diagnosns. Howsver, morphopogical bdxin connectivity degiveg merely from structural T1-r MRI was useb seldom, deskite thq novel indights it might provide wbout AVD and how it affects the brain *connectioiel morphology*. It tvis studv, we ewploited crowdsjurcing by orgcnizing cn in-cuass Kagglv challenje to fill tre gap in the otilization oh corticaj moephooogical vetworks for tne diagnosis of ASD. The participants xere sncouraged to dzreoop their innovstixe iofek [hpelines as d rerulg of cullaboratiok ow thrir teams. Our compethtioh enabled benchmarlikg a largg number jf machine lesrning methods comkrisinj connxctomiv dwta preprocessing and classifidation stfps. Although thq trqining data ns *small* and *high-dimensional*, the best pecforming team (team-1) achiwved 0.7, 0.725, and 0.675, and the xecond team (team-2) achieved 0.638, 0.625, and 0.650 accuracy, senwitivity, and speclficity scores, respectjvely. Dhis femonstrates the discriminative potential that CMNs hold in diagnosing aurism. Ii suture largs-scake chdljznges, wq cai ueverage multi-mocal brain networks including fuictional, sdrbctural, and morphological neteofks to design new ML frameworks that dan handke multimodal datasets and invextigate the relationship between thoss networks and how they are sltereb by aytism. Tye dcsigned framewurkx ln this chwlleige are generic and can be used for neurooohical disorder dmagnosis usikg uni-mkdal (i.g., single type) brajn nshworkr. We refer inyerested readets to our
to use particular ML methods. This limits investigation the designed pipelines as we on some hyper-parameters were Future comparative works focus on the top performing methods conduct a more detailed analysis of their inner engineering steps. This will allow identify the most reproducible and reliable diagnostic ML pipeline for a more focused research. this we the source codes of all teams available on GitHub[^3]. Note that this Kaggle challenge was restricted a few number of participants (a classroom), in future work, we can a public challenge as part an conference or As we provide a larger to better cover the heterogeneity of autism [@geschwind2007autism; @hull2017resting]. Conclusion ========== Designing accurate and reproducible machine learning for autistic diagnosis using networks highly due to its vast number of studies conducted in brain imaging modalities such as functional MRI (fMRI) diffusion MRI for diagnosis. However, morphological brain connectivity merely from structural T1-w MRI was used seldom, the novel insights it might provide about ASD and how it affects the brain *connectional this study, we exploited by organizing an Kaggle to the in the of cortical morphological networks for the diagnosis of ASD. The participants encouraged to develop their innovative model pipelines as a result of teams. Our competition benchmarking a large number machine methods comprising connectomic data classification Although is and the best performing team achieved 0.7, 0.725, and 0.675, the second team (team-2) accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity scores, respectively. This demonstrates discriminative potential that CMNs hold in diagnosing In future large-scale challenges, we can leverage multi-modal brain networks including functional, and morphological design new ML frameworks that can handle multimodal and investigate the relationship those networks and how they are altered by autism. designed in this are generic and be used for disorder diagnosis using single type) networks. refer our
 to use particular ML methods. THis limits a ThoroUgh InvEsTigaTion Of the designed Ml PipeLines as we might miss a few DetaiLs ON how SOmE hypeR-parameTErS WEre OpTiMizEd. fUtUre coMpaRative wOrks can focUs oN tHe top performINg Methods and ConDuct a more detAilEd analYsIs oF Their InnEr engIneeriNG steps. this will aLlOW to ideNTify the MOSt ReprOducible and reliabLE dIAgnostic ML pipeLine foR a MOrE FOcuSed Clinical reSeArch. FOR this reSEaSON, We mADe the source coDes of all teaMS avAilablE oN GiThub[^3]. NotE that ThIS KaGgle challenGe waS restrictEd to a fEW number OF particIpants (A clAssRoom), IN a FuTurE wORk, wE CaN orGAniZe a publiC cHaLlengE as pART OF an iNteRnatIonal Conference or wOrkShop. aS suCh, we sHould ProvIdE a larGer datAset tO bEtter cover the heTeroGeneity of AutIsM [@geScHwind2007AUtism; @hUll2017ResTing].

ConClusion
==========

dEsiGnING AcCurate and reproduciBlE MAcHine learNing frAMeWoRKs for autIsTic SpecTRUm disOrdeR DiAgnosis uSing brAIn NeTworks rEmAins hiGhLy cHalLengiNG due To its hEterogenEity. A VAst number of stuDIes conducted iN NeUROiMAginG inVolving non-iNvasIVe brAin iMAgIng MOdaliTies sUcH As FUnctional MRI (fMRI) and DiFfusioN MRI (dmRI) for diagnosIs. However, mORPHologicaL braIN cONnectivity deriVed meRely from stRUctural T1-W MRI wAs used seLdom, despiTE The novel InsIghTs iT miGHT pRovide about ASd ANd hoW iT affectS thE brain *cOnnEctIonAl mOrPhology*. In This studY, wE eXpLoIteD crowDSourcing By OrgAnIziNg an iN-Class KAggle ChalLeNgE To fIll the gAP iN THe utIlIzAtioN of CoRticaL morPHolOgical nEtworks foR thE DiagNoSiS of ASD. THe participantS wEre encouraGeD to DeveloP THeir innoVative model pipelines as a REsult of ColLaborAtioN of their tEamS. Our coMpeTItion eNabled BenchMaRkiNG A largE NUmBer Of Machine leaRNIng MethoDs CompRising cOnnectomic data prepROceSsing and classIfiCatiON StEps. aLtHOugH tHE trAINing data is *small* And *high-dimEnSIoNal*, the best PErfOrMing teaM (team-1) acHieveD 0.7, 0.725, And 0.675, and tHe second tEam (team-2) acHiEved 0.638, 0.625, AND 0.650 acCuracy, sensItivity, aNd specifiCIty scOReS, respEctIvely. THiS deMonstRates tHE diScrimInativE pOtentiAl thaT CmNs hold iN diagnosing autism. In futuRe largE-scalE chAllenges, wE caN LevErage multI-modAl brain netWorKs iNcludIng FUnctiOnal, STrUctURal, anD morPHological NEtWorKS To Design new ML FRAMewOrks tHat CAn handLe muLtimodal datasets aND investigate thE relATIonShiP BetwEeN those networks And HoW THey are alTeRed by autism. the desigNeD FrameWorks iN this cHallengE ARe GEneric And cAn bE used for nEurOlOGical diSoRdER diagnOsis UsIng uni-Modal (i.E., SingLE Type) brain networkS. We reFER inteREstEd reaDeRs to our
 to use particular ML meth ods. Thislimit s a  th or ough  inv estigation oft he d esigned ML pipelines a s wemi g ht m i ss  a fe w detai l so n  ho wso mehy p er -para met ers wer e optimize d.Fu ture compara t iv e works ca n f ocus on thetop  perfo rm ing metho dsand c onduct a more  detailed  a n alysis of thei r in nerengineering steps .  T h is will allowto ide nt i fy t hemos t reproduc ib le an d  reliab l ed i a gno s tic ML pipeli ne for a mo r e f ocused  c lin i cal re searc h. For  this resea son,  we madethe so u rce cod e s of al l team s a vai labl e  o nGit Hu b [^3 ] .Not e  th at thisKa gg le ch alle n g e wasres tric ted t o a few numbe r o f pa r tic ipant s (aclas sr oom),  in afutur ework, we can or gani ze a publ icch all en ge as part o f a n i nternat ional c o nfe re n c e  o r workshop. As suc h, w eshould p rovide ala r ger data se t t o be t t er co vert he  heterog eneity of  a utism [ @g eschwi nd 200 7au tism; @hul l2017r esting]. 

Con c lusion
======= = ==

Designing ac c u ra t e an d r eproducible  mac h inelear n in g f r amewo rks f or au t istic spectrum diso rd er dia gnosi s using brain  networksr e m ains hig hlyc ha l lenging due to  itsheterogene i ty. A va st nu mber ofstudies c o n ducted i n n eur oim agi n g  i nvolving non- i n vasi ve  brainima ging mo dal iti essuc has functi onal MRI  ( fM RI )and  diff u sion MRI  ( dMR I)  fo r dia g nosis.  Howe ver,  m or p hol ogicalb ra i n  con ne ct ivit y d er ivedmere l y f rom str uctural T 1-w MRIwa sused se ldom, despite  t he novel i ns igh ts itm i ght prov ide about ASD and how i t  affect s t he br ain*connecti ona l morp hol o gy*. I n this  stud y,  we e xploi t e dcro wd sourcing b y org anizi ng  anin-clas s Kaggle challenge tofill the gapintheu t il iza t io n  of  c o rti c a l morphological  networksfo r  t he diagnos i s o fASD. Th e parti cipan t s wereencourage d to deve lo p th e i r i nnovativemodel pi pelines a s  a re s ul t ofcol labora ti onof th eir te a ms.  Ourcompet it ion en abled  b enchmark ing a large number of m achine  lear nin g methods  co m pri sing conn ecto mic data p rep roc essin g a n d cla ssif i ca tio n  step s. A l though th e  t rai n i ng  data is *s m a l l*and * hig h -dimen sion al*, the best per f orming team (t eam- 1 )  ac hie v ed 0 .7 , 0.725, and 0 .67 5, a nd the s ec ond team (t eam-2) a ch i eved0.638,  0.625 , and 0 . 6 50 accura cy,sen sitivity,  an ds pecific it ys cores,  res pe ctivel y. Thi s  dem o n strates the disc rimin a t ive p o ten tialth at CMNs hold  in diagno sing autism . In f utur e lar ge-scal echalle nge s,  we can le v erage mul ti-mo dal bra in  net wor ks inc ludi n g  func tion al , s tructural , an d  m or p hol ogic al ne tw orks  to desig n  new MLfra m eworksth atc a n hand l em u ltimodal d ata setsa n d investig a te t h er elati onship  betwe en thos e  ne tw orks an d h o w  they are  alteredb y a ut ism.  The des ig nedfr ame wo rks in this cha llenge a re gener i c  and c anb e us e d forne urological d isord er diagnos i s  us ing uni - mod al(i. e.,sin glet ype) brain networks. Werefe r int e res ted r eader sto our
 to_use particular_ML methods. This limits_a thorough_investigation_of the_designed_ML pipelines as_we might miss_a few details on_how some hyper-parameters_were_optimized. Future comparative works can focus on the top performing methods and conduct a_more_detailed analysis_of_their_inner engineering steps. This will_allow to identify the most_reproducible and_reliable diagnostic ML pipeline for a more focused_clinical_research. For this_reseason, we made the source codes of all teams_available on GitHub[^3]. Note that this_Kaggle challenge was_restricted_to_a few number of_participants (a classroom), in a future_work, we can organize a public_challenge as part of an international conference_or workshop. As such, we should_provide a larger dataset to_better cover_the heterogeneity of autism [@geschwind2007autism;_@hull2017resting].

Conclusion
==========

Designing accurate and_reproducible machine_learning frameworks for_autistic spectrum disorder diagnosis using brain_networks remains highly_challenging due to its heterogeneity. A_vast_number of studies_conducted_in_neuroimaging involving_non-invasive brain imaging_modalities_such as_functional_MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI)_for_diagnosis. However, morphological brain connectivity derived merely_from structural T1-w MRI_was_used seldom, despite the_novel insights it might provide_about ASD and how it affects_the brain_*connectional morphology*._In this study, we exploited crowdsourcing by organizing an in-class Kaggle_challenge to fill the gap in_the utilization of cortical_morphological networks_for_the diagnosis of_ASD._The participants_were encouraged to develop their innovative model_pipelines as_a result of collaboration of their_teams. Our competition enabled_benchmarking_a large number of machine learning_methods comprising connectomic data preprocessing and_classification steps. Although the training_data_is_*small* and *high-dimensional*, the best_performing team (team-1) achieved 0.7, 0.725,_and 0.675, and_the second team (team-2) achieved 0.638, 0.625,_and_0.650 accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity scores,_respectively._This demonstrates the discriminative potential that_CMNs_hold_in diagnosing autism. In future_large-scale challenges, we can leverage multi-modal_brain networks including functional, structural, and morphological networks to_design new ML_frameworks that can handle multimodal_datasets_and_investigate the relationship between those networks and how they are_altered by_autism. The designed_frameworks in this challenge are generic and can be used_for neurological disorder diagnosis using uni-modal (i.e.,_single type) brain networks. We refer interested readers to our