0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\
If $J_+\pm J_-$ are invertible and $J_{\pm}$ are integrable then $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are holomorphic Poisson structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$ if and only if $\operatorname{d}\!\ep_{\pm}=0$.

We call the $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ of Theorem \[thm:holo\_Poisson\_tamed\] the *holomorphic Poisson structures associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$*.

\[rem:holo\_Poisson\_tamed\] 1) Let $(M,L_1,L_2)$ be a generalized Kähler manifold with $J_++J_-$ invertible. Denote by $\e_{\pm}$ the (real) bivectors on $M$ which determine the holomorphic Poisson structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$, respectively, associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$; that is, with respect to $J_{\pm}$, we have $\e_{\pm}^{1,1}=0$ and the holomorphic bivectors corresponding to $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are $\e_{\pm}^{2,0}$, respectively.\
It quickly follows that $$\e_-=-\e_+=\tfrac12\bigl(J\ep^{-1}+\ep^{-1}J^*\bigr)=\tfrac12\bigl(J_+-J_-\bigr)\ep^{-1}=\tfrac14[J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$ where $(M,\ep,J)$ is the tamed symplectic manifold associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$.\
Hence, the symplectic foliation associated to $\e_+$ is given by ${\mathscr{V}}(={\rm im}(J_+-J_-)\,)$.\
2) If the generalized almost Kähler structure $(L_1,L_2)$ on $M$ corresponds to the quadruple $(g,b,J_+,J_-)$ then $(L_2,L_1)$ corresponds to $(g,b,J_+,-J_-)$. Assume that $(M,L_1,L_2)$ is a generalized Kähler manifold with $J_++J_-$ and $J_+-J_-$ invertible and let $\e_+$ and $\e_+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\ 
 If $ J_+\pm J_-$ are invertible and $ J_{\pm}$ are integrable then $ \r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are holomorphic Poisson structures on $ (M, J_{\pm})$ if and only if $ \operatorname{d}\!\ep_{\pm}=0$. 

 We call the $ \r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ of Theorem \[thm: holo\_Poisson\_tamed\ ] the * holomorphic Poisson structures consociate to $ (M, L_1,L_2)$ *. 

 \[rem: holo\_Poisson\_tamed\ ] 1) lease $ (M, L_1,L_2)$ be a generalized Kähler manifold with $ J_++J_-$ invertible. Denote by $ \e_{\pm}$ the (real) bivectors on $ M$ which decide the holomorphic Poisson structures on $ (M, J_{\pm})$, respectively, associated to $ (M, L_1,L_2)$; that is, with regard to $ J_{\pm}$, we give birth $ \e_{\pm}^{1,1}=0 $ and the holomorphic bivectors corresponding to $ \r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are $ \e_{\pm}^{2,0}$, respectively.\ 
 It quickly follows that $ $ \e_-=-\e_+=\tfrac12\bigl(J\ep^{-1}+\ep^{-1}J^*\bigr)=\tfrac12\bigl(J_+-J_-\bigr)\ep^{-1}=\tfrac14[J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$ where $ (M,\ep, J)$ is the tamed symplectic manifold paper associated to $ (M, L_1,L_2)$.\ 
 Hence, the symplectic foliation associated to $ \e_+$ is given by $ { \mathscr{V}}(={\rm im}(J_+-J_-)\,)$.\ 
 2) If the popularize almost Kähler structure $ (L_1,L_2)$ on $ M$ corresponds to the quadruple $ (g, b, J_+,J_-)$ then $ (L_2,L_1)$ corresponds to $ (g, b, J_+,-J_-)$. Assume that $ (M, L_1,L_2)$ is a generalized Kähler manifold with $ J_++J_-$ and $ J_+-J_-$ invertible and let $ \e_+$ and $ \e_+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\gm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\
If $J_+\km J_-$ are invertible and $O_{\pm}$ are integracle then $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are holomorphir Pousson structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$ if and only if $\operqtoriame{d}\!\ep_{\pm}=0$.

We call the $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ of Tgcorem \[vhm:holo\_Poisson\_tsmed\] the *hmlomorphic Poivsun structures associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$*.

\[rem:holj\_Poissom\_twmed\] 1) Let $(M,L_1,L_2)$ fe a denedalized Kähler manifold with $J_++J_-$ invsrtible. Denote by $\e_{\pk}$ the (real) bivectors on $M$ ahicj determine the hopomorphic Piissjb structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$, rts'ectively, aasociated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$; that is, with rdspecc to $J_{\pm}$, we hqve $\g_{\pm}^{1,1}=0$ and the iolomogphic bivectovx corraspondimg to $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are $\e_{\pk}^{2,0}$, rwspectively.\
It quickly follows that $$\e_-=-\e_+=\tftac12\bigl(J\ep^{-1}+\ap^{-1}L^*\bigr)=\tfrac12\bigl(J_+-J_-\bigr)\ep^{-1}=\tdrac14[J_+,B_-]g^{-1}\;,$$ wvere $(N,\ep,G)$ ia vhe tamed syjplectic mznifold assiciated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$.\
Hence, trv symplectic roliatyog associated to $\e_+$ is given by ${\mathscr{V}}(={\rk ij}(J_+-J_-)\,)$.\
2) If the generalized qlmost Kähler structurg $(L_1,L_2)$ on $M$ sorresponds to the quadruple $(g,b,J_+,J_-)$ then $(L_2,L_1)$ correspmnds vo $(g,b,L_+,-M_-)$. Xwskme that $(M,L_1,L_2)$ is a generalized Kähler manifold rjtn $M_++J_-$ and $J_+-J_-$ invertlble and let $\e_+$ and $\e_+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\ If $J_+\pm J_-$ are invertible are then $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ holomorphic Poisson structures if We call the of Theorem \[thm:holo\_Poisson\_tamed\] *holomorphic Poisson structures associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$*. 1) Let $(M,L_1,L_2)$ be a generalized Kähler manifold with $J_++J_-$ invertible. Denote by the (real) bivectors on $M$ which determine the holomorphic Poisson structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$, associated $(M,L_1,L_2)$; is, respect to $J_{\pm}$, we have $\e_{\pm}^{1,1}=0$ and the holomorphic bivectors corresponding to $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are $\e_{\pm}^{2,0}$, respectively.\ quickly follows that $$\e_-=-\e_+=\tfrac12\bigl(J\ep^{-1}+\ep^{-1}J^*\bigr)=\tfrac12\bigl(J_+-J_-\bigr)\ep^{-1}=\tfrac14[J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$ where $(M,\ep,J)$ is the symplectic manifold associated to Hence, the symplectic foliation associated $\e_+$ given by im}(J_+-J_-)\,)$.\ If generalized almost Kähler $(L_1,L_2)$ on $M$ corresponds to the quadruple $(g,b,J_+,J_-)$ then $(L_2,L_1)$ corresponds to $(g,b,J_+,-J_-)$. Assume that $(M,L_1,L_2)$ is generalized Kähler $J_++J_-$ and invertible let and $\e_+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\
If $J_+\Pm J_-$ are inveRtiblE anD $J_{\pM}$ aRe inTegrAble then $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ arE HoloMorphic Poisson structurEs on $(M,j_{\pM})$ If anD OnLy if $\oPeratorNAmE{D}\!\Ep_{\pM}=0$.

WE cAll ThE $\R^{\pM}_*(L_2)$ of THeoRem \[thm:hOlo\_Poisson\_TamEd\] The *holomorphIC POisson struCtuRes associateD to $(m,L_1,L_2)$*.

\[rem:HoLo\_POIsson\_TamEd\] 1) Let $(m,L_1,L_2)$ be a GEneralIzed KähleR mANifold WIth $J_++J_-$ inVERtIble. denote by $\e_{\pm}$ the (reaL) BiVEctors on $M$ which DetermInE ThE HOloMorPhic PoissoN sTructURes on $(M,J_{\PM})$, rESPEctIVely, associateD to $(M,L_1,L_2)$; that iS, WitH respeCt To $J_{\PM}$, we havE $\e_{\pm}^{1,1}=0$ aNd THe hOlomorphic bIvecTors correSpondiNG to $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ ARe $\e_{\pm}^{2,0}$, reSpectiVelY.\
It QuicKLy FoLloWs THat $$\E_-=-\E_+=\tFraC12\BigL(J\ep^{-1}+\ep^{-1}J^*\bIgR)=\tFrac12\bIgl(J_+-j_-\BIGR)\ep^{-1}=\tFraC14[J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$ Where $(m,\ep,J)$ is the tameD syMpleCTic ManifOld asSociAtEd to $(M,l_1,L_2)$.\
HencE, the sYmPlectic foliatioN assOciated to $\E_+$ is GiVen By ${\MathsCR{V}}(={\rm im}(j_+-J_-)\,)$.\
2) IF thE generaLized alMOst käHLER sTructure $(L_1,L_2)$ on $M$ correSpONDs To the quaDruple $(G,B,J_+,j_-)$ tHEn $(L_2,L_1)$ corrEsPonDs to $(G,B,j_+,-J_-)$. AssUme tHAt $(m,L_1,L_2)$ is a geNeraliZEd käHler manIfOld witH $J_++j_-$ anD $J_+-J_-$ InverTIble And let $\E_+$ and $\e_+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i} \,\overlin e{\ep _{\ mp} }\ bigr )$.\ 
If $J_+\pm J_ - $ ar e invertible and $J_{\ pm}$ar e  int e gr ablethen $\ r ^{ \ p m}_ *( L_ 2)$  a r eholom orp hic Poi sson struc tur es  on $(M,J_{\ p m} )$ if andonl y if $\opera tor name{d }\ !\e p _{\pm }=0 $.

W e call the $\ r^{\pm}_* (L _ 2)$ of Theorem \ [t hm:h olo\_Poisson\_tam e d\ ]  the *holomorp hic Po is s on s tru ctu res associ at ed to $(M,L_1 , L_ 2 ) $ *.\[rem:holo\_P oisson\_tam e d\]  1) Le t$(M , L_1,L_ 2)$ b ea  ge neralized K ähle r manifol d with $J_++J_ - $ inver tible.  De not e by $\ e_ {\p m} $  th e  ( rea l ) b ivectors  o n$M$ w hich d e t ermi netheholom orphic Poisso n s truc t ure s on$(M,J _{\p m} )$, r espect ively ,associated to $ (M,L _1,L_2)$;  th at  is ,withr espect  to  $J _{\pm}$ , we ha v e $ \e _ { \ pm }^{1,1}=0$ and the  h o l om orphic b ivecto r sco r respondi ng  to  $\r ^ { \pm}_ *(L_ 2 )$  are $\e _{\pm} ^ {2 ,0 }$, res pe ctivel y. \
I t q uickl y  fol lows t hat $$\e _-=-\ e _+=\tfrac12\bi g l(J\ep^{-1}+\ e p^ { - 1} J ^*\b igr )=\tfrac12\ bigl ( J_+- J_-\ b ig r)\ e p^{-1 }=\tf ra c 14 [ J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$  w here $ (M,\e p,J)$ is thetamed symp l e c tic mani fold as s ociated to $(M ,L_1, L_2)$.\
He n ce, thesympl ectic fo liation a s s ociatedto$\e _+$  is g iv en by ${\math s c r{V} }( ={\rm i m}( J_+-J_- )\, )$. \
2 ) I fthe gener alized a lm os tKä hle r str u cture $( L_ 1,L _2 )$on $M $  corre spond s to  t he qua druple$ (g , b ,J_+ ,J _- )$ t hen  $ (L_2, L_1) $  co rrespon ds to $(g ,b, J _+,- J_ -) $. Assu me that $(M,L _1 ,L_2)$ isagen eraliz e d  Kählermanifold with $J_++J_-$ and $J_ +-J _-$ i nver tible and  le t $\e_ +$a nd $\e _+
0,1}_+M+T^{0,1}_-M,{\rm i}\,\overline{\ep_{\mp}}\bigr)$.\
If_$J_+\pm J_-$_are invertible and $J_{\pm}$_are integrable_then_$\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are_holomorphic_Poisson structures on_$(M,J_{\pm})$ if and_only if $\operatorname{d}\!\ep_{\pm}=0$.

We call_the $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ of_Theorem_\[thm:holo\_Poisson\_tamed\] the *holomorphic Poisson structures associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$*.

\[rem:holo\_Poisson\_tamed\] 1) Let $(M,L_1,L_2)$ be a generalized_Kähler_manifold with_$J_++J_-$_invertible._Denote by $\e_{\pm}$ the (real)_bivectors on $M$ which determine_the holomorphic_Poisson structures on $(M,J_{\pm})$, respectively, associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$;_that_is, with respect_to $J_{\pm}$, we have $\e_{\pm}^{1,1}=0$ and the holomorphic bivectors_corresponding to $\r^{\pm}_*(L_2)$ are $\e_{\pm}^{2,0}$, respectively.\
It_quickly follows that_$$\e_-=-\e_+=\tfrac12\bigl(J\ep^{-1}+\ep^{-1}J^*\bigr)=\tfrac12\bigl(J_+-J_-\bigr)\ep^{-1}=\tfrac14[J_+,J_-]g^{-1}\;,$$_where_$(M,\ep,J)$ is the tamed_symplectic manifold associated to $(M,L_1,L_2)$.\
Hence, the_symplectic foliation associated to $\e_+$ is_given by ${\mathscr{V}}(={\rm im}(J_+-J_-)\,)$.\
2) If the generalized_almost Kähler structure $(L_1,L_2)$ on $M$_corresponds to the quadruple $(g,b,J_+,J_-)$_then $(L_2,L_1)$_corresponds to $(g,b,J_+,-J_-)$. Assume that_$(M,L_1,L_2)$ is a_generalized Kähler_manifold with $J_++J_-$_and $J_+-J_-$ invertible and let $\e_+$_and $\e_+