 of $V$ (this was the generalization described by Beasley in [@Beasley]). Where the holomorphic submanifold intersects the Sasaki-Einstein manifold, we obtain a supersymmetric cycle that describes the instantaneous position of the brane at some time $t$. The basic conjecture is that dibaryon and multi-baryon operators are given by some cycle inside $X$, but there is no obvious rule to follow that tells us which particular dibaryon or multi-baryon operator goes to which particular cycle of $X$.

In a certain sense, natural conjectures as to how one should describe these objects are available in the literature [@IW], but they are not explicit enough to provide a complete solution of the problem in the most general case. Also, they need to be corrected because it turns out that not all the matter fields joining two nodes correspond to the same anomalous dimension [@BBC] (this results from the a-maximization procedure to calculate anomalous dimensions of fields [@IW1]).

We seem to be in a situation where the matching between operators and geometry is not obvious. The evidence for the identification is done by matching operator dimensions with the energies of branes in the gravity theory (one measures their volumes) plus any other quantum numbers that one has at ones disposal. So in situations where there is a lot of symmetry, one can in principle make a match of sufficiently symmetric objects. However, brane configurations can have degeneracies. This is because they come in families, and so we would like to know how to count these degeneracies as well as how to match them with the field theory. Moreover, we would like to have a precise map between field theory objects and geometric configurations, rather than a patchwork of matching of dimensions and degeneracies.

The purpose of this paper is to explain how to tie the conjectures between branes and dibaryons to a more precise formulation in terms of the (algebraic) geometry of the Calabi-Yau singularity that one wishes to study. In this way one can have a precise description that ties these two classes of objects (dibaryon operators and cycles) in a canonical way, rather than an ad-hoc prescription for matching dimensions and volumes of cycles. Our idea is to give an additional interpretation to the arrows of a quiver diagram as particular global sections of a non trivial holomorphic vector bundle over $V$. In two of the examples we study we have that the arrows can be considered as holomorhic global
of $ V$ (this was the generalization described by Beasley in [ @Beasley ]). Where the holomorphic submanifold intersects the Sasaki - Einstein manifold, we receive a supersymmetric hertz that describes the instantaneous position of the brane at some time $ t$. The basic guess is that dibaryon and multi - baryon operators are given by some bicycle inside $ X$, but there be no obvious rule to keep up that tells us which particular dibaryon or multi - baryon hustler goes to which particular cycle of $ X$. 

 In a certain common sense, natural conjectures as to how one should identify these objects are available in the literature [ @IW ], but they are not explicit enough to supply a complete solution of the problem in the most general character. Also, they need to be corrected because it turns out that not all the topic fields join two nodes correspond to the same anomalous property [ @BBC ] (this results from the a - maximization procedure to calculate anomalous dimensions of fields [ @IW1 ]). 

 We seem to be in a situation where the matching between operators and geometry is not obvious. The evidence for the identification is done by matching operator dimensions with the energies of branes in the gravity theory (one measures their volume) plus any other quantum numbers that one have at one disposal. So in situation where there constitute a lot of symmetry, one can in rationale make a match of sufficiently symmetric objects. However, brane configurations can have degeneracies. This is because they come in families, and so we would like to know how to consider these degeneracies equally well as how to pit them with the field theory. Moreover, we would like to accept a precise map between field hypothesis objects and geometric shape, rather than a patchwork of matching of dimensions and corruption. 

 The purpose of this newspaper is to explain how to tie the speculation between branes and dibaryons to a more precise conceptualization in terms of the (algebraic) geometry of the Calabi - Yau singularity that one wishes to study. In this way one can receive a precise description that ties these two classes of objects (dibaryon operators and cycle) in a canonical means, rather than an ad - hoc prescription for matching dimensions and volumes of cycle. Our idea is to give an extra interpretation to the arrows of a quiver diagram as particular global sections of a non trivial holomorphic vector pile over $ V$. In two of the examples we study we have that the arrows can be considered as holomorhic global
 of $V$ (this was the generalieation described yt Beasney in [@Beasley]). Where the holomorphic submaiifood inuvrsects the Sasaki-Einrtein manpfold, we ibtamn a supersymmetcjc cyclc thaf desermbes the instanjaneous posidion of the brdnd ct some time $t$. The basic conjecture ys that dlbaryon and mujti-bswyon operators are given by some cycle inside $X$, but there os no obvious rule to folllw tjat tells us which particular dibweyon or multk-baryon optrctor goes tk which particular cycle of $X$.

In a cextain sense, nqtugdl conjectuces as to how one should dascribe these objects arx avqilable in the literavure [@IW], but they are not explhcnt enough to provide q xomplgte smlutkin uf uhe pdoblem in the most feneral casw. Also, they need to bq corrected bedause yt turns out that not all the matter fielgs noining two nodes correwpond to the same anolalous diiension [@BBC] (this results from the a-maximization psocednrd ti galcjoahe anomalous dimensions of fields [@IW1]).

We seem tj bt ik a situation whcre the matching brtaerg operators avd geometdy is not obvious. Hhe eviqence for the ydenyification is done by matchung operator eimensions with thz energies oy brangs in yhe gravity theory (one oeashres their golumes) pmjs any other quavtuk tumbers ufat one has at onqs disposel. So in sitjatipns whqre there ls a lot of symmetry, one can nn prhnciple mane a match of sufficiently symmxvric objects. Nofevvr, brane eonfigmrations can hade degeneraciex. This ns becxuse they bome in femilies, and fo we would lhne to know hmw to cotnt rhesw degendfacies as well as how to match thwm with the field bheori. Joreover, we wouod oike to have a lrezisq la' betraen field thaory obgrcts xnd geometrlc zonfogurations, rather thdn a patchwork of matcnikg of dimgnsions agd degeneracirs.

The purpose of tjis peper ir to rxpjain how to tie the conjecturea between brwnes and dibwryoks tj a more pxecise formulation in terms of the (algebcaic) geometry of the Caoabi-Yau singularity uhat one wishxs to ftudy. In dhis way one can havw a precise descrlption that ties these two cnassed of objects (dibaryon operators and cycles) in a canonical way, rather than an ad-ios prescriptjon gor mdtehiug dimegsiois and volumes of bycles. Our idea is to give an advitional ittzrpretation to the arrows of s duiver diagrao as particular global ssctions pf a non trivial holomorphic vevtor bundle over $V$. In twp of the examlles wv svudy we have that thr arrocs can be conwideved as holomorfic gpobal
of $V$ (this was the generalization described in Where the submanifold intersects the supersymmetric that describes the position of the at some time $t$. The basic is that dibaryon and multi-baryon operators are given by some cycle inside $X$, there is no obvious rule to follow that tells us which particular dibaryon multi-baryon goes which cycle of $X$. In a certain sense, natural conjectures as to how one should describe these are available in the literature [@IW], but they not explicit enough to a complete solution of the in most general Also, need be corrected because turns out that not all the matter fields joining two nodes correspond to the same anomalous dimension (this results a-maximization procedure calculate dimensions fields [@IW1]). We be in a situation where the and geometry is not obvious. The evidence for identification is by matching operator dimensions with the of branes in the gravity theory (one measures volumes) plus any other quantum numbers that one has at ones disposal. So in situations is a lot of one can in make match sufficiently objects. However, configurations can have degeneracies. This is because they come in families, so we would like to know how to count these well how to match with the field theory. we like to have a between theory configurations, than patchwork of matching of and degeneracies. The purpose of paper is to explain between branes and dibaryons to a more precise in terms of the (algebraic) geometry of Calabi-Yau singularity that one wishes to study. In this way one can a precise ties these two classes of objects (dibaryon operators cycles) in a canonical rather than an ad-hoc prescription for matching dimensions and of Our idea to give an interpretation to the of a quiver particular global of non bundle over $V$. In two of examples study we have that the can as holomorhic global
 of $V$ (this was the generalizatiOn describeD by BeAslEy iN [@BEaslEy]). WhEre the holomorpHIc suBmanifold intersects the sasakI-EINsteIN mAnifoLd, we obtAIn A SUpeRsYmMetRiC CyCle thAt dEscribeS the instanTanEoUs position of THe Brane at somE tiMe $t$. The basic cOnjEcture Is ThaT DibarYon And muLti-barYOn operAtors are gIvEN by somE Cycle inSIDe $x$, but There is no obvious rULe TO follow that telLs us whIcH PaRTIcuLar Dibaryon or MuLti-baRYon operAToR GOEs tO Which particulAr cycle of $X$.

IN A ceRtain sEnSe, nATural cOnjecTuREs aS to how one shOuld Describe tHese obJEcts are AVailablE in the LitEraTure [@iw], bUt TheY aRE noT ExPliCIt eNough to pRoViDe a coMpleTE SOLutiOn oF the ProblEm in the most geNerAl caSE. AlSo, theY need To be CoRrectEd becaUse it TuRns out that not alL the Matter fieLds JoIniNg Two noDEs corrEspOnd To the saMe anomaLOus DiMENSiOn [@BBC] (this results frOm THE a-MaximizaTion prOCeDuRE to calcuLaTe aNomaLOUs dimEnsiONs Of fields [@iW1]).

We seEM tO bE in a sitUaTion whErE thE maTchinG BetwEen opeRators anD geomETry is not obviouS. the evidence foR ThE IDeNTifiCatIon is done by MatcHIng oPeraTOr DimENsionS with ThE EnERgies of branes in the gRaVity thEory (oNe measures theIr volumes) pLUS Any other QuanTUm NUmbers that one hAs at oNes disposaL. so in situAtionS where thEre is a lot OF Symmetry, One Can In pRinCIPlE make a match of SUFficIeNtly symMetRic objeCts. howEveR, brAnE configurAtions caN hAvE dEgEneRacieS. this is beCaUse ThEy cOme in FAmilieS, and sO we wOuLd LIke To know hOW tO COunt ThEsE degEneRaCies aS welL As hOw to matCh them witH thE FielD tHeOry. MoreOver, we would liKe To have a preCiSe mAp betwEEN field thEory objects and geometric COnfigurAtiOns, raTher Than a patcHwoRk of maTchINg of diMensioNs and DeGenERAcies.

tHE pUrpOsE of this papER Is tO explAiN how To tie thE conjectures betweeN BraNes and dibaryoNs tO a moRE PrEciSE fORmuLaTIon IN Terms of the (algebRaic) geometRy OF tHe Calabi-YaU SinGuLarity tHat one wIshes TO study. IN this way oNe can have A pReciSE DesCription thAt ties thEse two claSSes of OBjEcts (dIbaRyon opErAtoRs and Cycles) IN a cAnoniCal way, RaTher thAn an aD-hOc prescrIption for matching dimensIons anD voluMes Of cycles. OUr iDEa iS to give an AddiTional inteRprEtaTion tO thE ArrowS of a QUiVer DIagraM as pARticular gLObAl sECTiOns of a non trIVIAl hOlomoRphIC vectoR bunDle over $V$. In two of thE Examples we studY we hAVE thAt tHE arrOwS can be considerEd aS hOLOmorhic gLoBal
 of $V$ (this was the gene ralization  desc rib edby  Bea sley  in [@Beasley] ) . Wh ere the holomorphic su bmani fo l d in t er sects  the Sa s ak i - Ein st ei n m an i fo ld, w e o btain a  supersymm etr ic  cycle thatd es cribes the  in stantaneouspos itionof  th e  bran e a t som e time $t$. T he basicco n jectur e  is tha t di bary on and multi-bary o no perators are g iven b ys om e cyc leinside $X$ ,but t h ere isn oo b v iou s  rule to foll ow that tel l s u s whic hpar t icular  diba ry o n o r multi-bar yonoperatorgoes t o  whichp articul ar cyc leof$X$. 
I na c er t ain se nse ,  na tural co nj ec tures  ast o h ow o neshou ld de scribe theseobj ects are  avai lable  inth e lit eratur e [@I W] , but they arenotexpliciteno ug h t oprovi d e a co mpl ete  soluti on of t h e p ro b l e min the most genera lc a se . Also,they n e ed  t o  be corr ec ted  bec a u se it  tur n sout that  not a l lth e matte rfields  j oin ing  twon odes  corre spond to  thes ame anomalousd imension [@BB C ]( t hi s  res ult s from thea-ma x imiz atio n  p roc e dureto ca lc u la t e anomalous dimensi on s of f ields  [@IW1]).

We  seem to b e i n a situ atio n  w h ere the matchi ng be tween oper a tors and  geom etry isnot obvio u s . The ev ide nce  fo r t h e  i dentification i s do ne  by mat chi ng oper ato r d ime nsi on s with th e energi es  o fbr ane s int he gravi ty  th eo ry(onem easure s the ir v ol um e s)plus an y  o t h er q ua nt um n umb er s tha t on e  ha s at on es dispos al. So i nsi tuation s where there  i s a lot of  s ymm etry,o n e can in  principle make a match of suff ici ently  sym metric ob jec ts. Ho wev e r, bra ne con figur at ion s can h a v edeg en eracies. T h i s i s bec au se t hey com e in families, and sowe would like  to  kno w ho w t o  c o unt  t h ese d egeneracies aswell as ho wt omatch them wit hthe fie ld theo ry. M o reover,  we would  like toha ve a p rec ise map be tween fi eld theor y  obje c ts  andgeo metric  c onf igura tions, rat her t han apa tchwor k ofma tching o f dimensions and degene racies .

Th e p urpose of  th i s p aper is t o ex plain howtotie  thecon j ectur es b e tw een brane s an d  dibaryon s  t o a m or e precise f o r m ula tionint erms o f th e (algebraic) geo m etry of the Ca labi - Y ausin g ular it y that one wis hes  t o study. I nthis way on e can ha ve a pre cise d escrip tion th a t  t i es the se t woclasses o f o bj e cts (di ba ry o n oper ator sand cy cles)i n ac a nonical way, rat her t h a n ana d-h oc pr es criptio n  for  matchingdimensionsand vo lume s ofcycles.  O ur ide a i sto give an additiona l int erpreta ti on t o t he arr owso f  a qu iver  d iag ram as pa r t ic u la rg lob al s ectio ns  ofa non tri v ial holo mor p hic vec to r b u n dle ov e r$ V $. In twoofthe e x a mples we s t udyw eh ave t hat th e arro ws canb e c on sidered  as h olomorhic  global
 of_$V$ (this_was the generalization described_by Beasley_in_[@Beasley]). Where_the_holomorphic submanifold intersects_the Sasaki-Einstein manifold,_we obtain a supersymmetric_cycle that describes_the_instantaneous position of the brane at some time $t$. The basic conjecture is that_dibaryon_and multi-baryon_operators_are_given by some cycle inside_$X$, but there is no_obvious rule_to follow that tells us which particular dibaryon_or_multi-baryon operator goes_to which particular cycle of $X$.

In a certain sense,_natural conjectures as to how one_should describe these_objects_are_available in the literature_[@IW], but they are not explicit_enough to provide a complete solution_of the problem in the most general_case. Also, they need to be_corrected because it turns out_that not_all the matter fields joining_two nodes correspond_to the_same anomalous dimension_[@BBC] (this results from the a-maximization_procedure to calculate_anomalous dimensions of fields [@IW1]).

We seem_to_be in a_situation_where_the matching_between operators and_geometry_is not_obvious._The evidence for the identification is_done_by matching operator dimensions with the energies_of branes in the_gravity_theory (one measures their_volumes) plus any other quantum_numbers that one has at ones_disposal. So_in situations_where there is a lot of symmetry, one can in principle_make a match of sufficiently symmetric_objects. However, brane configurations_can have_degeneracies._This is because_they_come in_families, and so we would like to_know how_to count these degeneracies as well_as how to match_them_with the field theory. Moreover, we_would like to have a precise_map between field theory objects_and_geometric_configurations, rather than a patchwork_of matching of dimensions and degeneracies.

The_purpose of this_paper is to explain how to tie_the_conjectures between branes and dibaryons to_a_more precise formulation in terms of_the_(algebraic)_geometry of the Calabi-Yau singularity_that one wishes to study. In_this way one can have a precise description that_ties these two_classes of objects (dibaryon operators_and_cycles)_in a canonical way, rather than an ad-hoc prescription for_matching dimensions_and volumes of_cycles. Our idea is to give an additional interpretation to_the arrows of a quiver diagram as_particular global sections of a non trivial holomorphic vector bundle over_$V$. In two of the examples we study_we have that the arrows can be_considered as holomorhic global