 of $\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped to an opposite by $\theta$. It is then easy to see that there is also a non-domestic cotype $1$ panel (by a residue argument) and hence $\theta$ is strongly exceptional domestic. Now suppose that the absolute points of $\theta$ form a union of two hyperplanes, and that the fixed point set $F$ of $\theta$ is a $k$-space with $k=n-1+j$ for some $0\leq j\leq n-3$. An argument as in the previous paragraph shows that there is a non-domestic point $p$ such that $p^{\perp}$ intersects $F$ in an $(n-2+j)$-space. By induction, with Lemma \[lem:CBase3\] as the base case, the collineation $\theta_p$ of the $\sC_{n-1}(2)$ building $\mathrm{Res}(p)$ has diagram

at (0,0.3) ; at (-5,0) (-5) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-4,0) (-4) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-3,0) (-3) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-2,0) (-2) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-1,0) (-1) [$\bullet$]{}; at (1,0) (1) [$\bullet$]{}; at (2,0) (2) [$\bullet$]{}; at (3,0) (3) [$\bullet$]{}; at (4,0) (4) [$\bullet$]{}; at (5,0) (5) [$\bullet$]{}; at (2,-0.75) [$n-j$]{}; at (-5,-0.75) [$2$]{}; at (-4,-0.75) [$3$]{}; at (5,-0.75) [$n$]{}; (-5.north west) rectangle (-5.south east); (-4.north west) rectangle (-4.south east); (-3.north west) rectangle (-3.south east); (-2.north west) rectangle (-2.south east); (-1.north west) rectangle (-1.south east); (1.north west) rectangle (1.south east); (2.north west) rectangle (2.south east); (-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (
of $ \mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped to an opposite by $ \theta$. It is then easy to see that there be besides a non - domestic cotype $ 1 $ panel (by a residue argument) and therefore $ \theta$ is strongly especial domestic. Now suppose that the absolute decimal point of $ \theta$ form a union of two hyperplanes, and that the sterilize point set $ F$ of $ \theta$ is a $ k$-space with $ kilobyte = n-1+j$ for some $ 0\leq j\leq n-3$. An argument as in the previous paragraph testify that there is a non - domestic point $ p$ such that $ p^{\perp}$ intersects $ F$ in an $ (n-2+j)$-space. By induction, with Lemma   \[lem: CBase3\ ] as the base case, the collineation $ \theta_p$ of the $ \sC_{n-1}(2)$ building $ \mathrm{Res}(p)$ has diagram 

 at (0,0.3); at (-5,0) (-5) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (-4,0) (-4) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (-3,0) (-3) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (-2,0) (-2) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (-1,0) (-1) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (1,0) (1) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (2,0) (2) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (3,0) (3) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (4,0) (4) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (5,0) (5) [ $ \bullet$ ] { }; at (2,-0.75) [ $ n - j$ ] { }; at (-5,-0.75) [ $ 2 $ ] { }; at (-4,-0.75) [ $ 3 $ ] { }; at (5,-0.75) [ $ n$ ] { }; (-5.north west) rectangle (-5.south east); (-4.north west) rectangle (-4.south east); (-3.north west) rectangle (-3.south east); (-2.north west) rectangle (-2.south east); (-1.north west) rectangle (-1.south east); (1.north west) rectangle (1.south east); (2.north west) rectangle (2.south east); (-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (
 of $\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped to an okposite by $\theta$. Nr is tien easg to see that there is also a non-domxstix cottpe $1$ panel (by a residud argumenn) and henxe $\tieta$ is strongly exceptional dklestnc. Now suppose tmat the absmlute points ox $\ghzta$ form a union of two hyperplanes, wnd thay hhe fixed poinj set $S$ of $\nhtta$ is a $k$-space with $k=n-1+j$ for some $0\leq j\ltq n-3$. An argument ax in the previous paragrapj shlws that there is w non-domestuc pjunt $p$ such tfat $p^{\perp}$ putersects $F$ in an $(n-2+j)$-space. By induction, witf Lemka \[lem:CBase3\] aw tjg base case, vhe cojlineation $\tmvta_p$ of the $\sC_{m-1}(2)$ building $\matmrm{Rev}(p)$ yas diagram

at (0,0.3) ; at (-5,0) (-5) [$\uullet$]{}; at (-4,0) (-4) [$\bullet$]{}; aj (-3,0) (-3) [$\bullet$]{}; ac (-2,0) (-2) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-1,0) (-1) [$\buller$]{}; qt (1,0) (1) [$\tullat$]{}; ag (2,0) (2) [$\culmev$]{}; af (3,0) (3) [$\buplev$]{}; at (4,0) (4) [$\bullst$]{}; at (5,0) (5) [$\buloet$]{}; at (2,-0.75) [$n-j$]{}; at (-5,-0.75) [$2$]{}; at (-4,-0.75) [$3$]{}; wn (5,-0.75) [$n$]{}; (-5.north weat) receaggle (-5.south east); (-4.north west) rectangle (-4.solth sast); (-3.north west) rectangoe (-3.south east); (-2.north wgst) rectandle (-2.south east); (-1.north west) rectangle (-1.south east); (1.nosth wxsg) rtcbwvtlf (1.south east); (2.north west) rectangle (2.south east); (-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (
of $\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped to an opposite by is easy to that there is panel a residue argument) hence $\theta$ is exceptional domestic. Now suppose that the points of $\theta$ form a union of two hyperplanes, and that the fixed set $F$ of $\theta$ is a $k$-space with $k=n-1+j$ for some $0\leq j\leq An as the paragraph shows that there is a non-domestic point $p$ such that $p^{\perp}$ intersects $F$ in an By induction, with Lemma \[lem:CBase3\] as the base the collineation $\theta_p$ of $\sC_{n-1}(2)$ building $\mathrm{Res}(p)$ has diagram (0,0.3) at (-5,0) [$\bullet$]{}; (-4,0) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-3,0) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-2,0) (-2) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-1,0) (-1) [$\bullet$]{}; at (1,0) (1) [$\bullet$]{}; at (2,0) (2) [$\bullet$]{}; (3,0) (3) (4,0) (4) at (5) at (2,-0.75) [$n-j$]{}; [$2$]{}; at (-4,-0.75) [$3$]{}; at (5,-0.75) rectangle (-5.south east); (-4.north west) rectangle (-4.south east); west) rectangle east); (-2.north west) rectangle (-2.south east); west) rectangle (-1.south east); (1.north west) rectangle (1.south (2.north west) rectangle (2.south east); (-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (
 of $\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped to an opposIte by $\theta$. it is tHen EasY tO see That There is also a noN-DomeStic cotype $1$ panel (by a resiDue arGuMEnt) aND hEnce $\tHeta$ is sTRoNGLy eXcEpTioNaL DoMestiC. NoW supposE that the abSolUtE points of $\theTA$ fOrm a union oF twO hyperplanes, And That thE fIxeD Point Set $f$ of $\thEta$ is a $K$-Space wIth $k=n-1+j$ for SoME $0\leq j\lEQ n-3$. An argUMEnT as iN the previous paragRApH Shows that there Is a non-DoMEsTIC poInt $P$ such that $p^{\PeRp}$ intERsects $F$ IN aN $(N-2+J)$-SpaCE. By induction, wIth Lemma \[lem:cbasE3\] as the BaSe cASe, the cOllinEaTIon $\Theta_p$ of the $\SC_{n-1}(2)$ bUilding $\maThrm{ReS}(P)$ has diaGRam

at (0,0.3) ; at (-5,0) (-5) [$\Bullet$]{}; At (-4,0) (-4) [$\bUllEt$]{}; at (-3,0) (-3) [$\BUlLeT$]{}; at (-2,0) (-2) [$\BuLLet$]{}; AT (-1,0) (-1) [$\bUllET$]{}; at (1,0) (1) [$\Bullet$]{}; at (2,0) (2) [$\BuLlEt$]{}; at (3,0) (3) [$\bUlleT$]{}; AT (4,0) (4) [$\BUlleT$]{}; at (5,0) (5) [$\BullEt$]{}; at (2,-0.75) [$n-J$]{}; at (-5,-0.75) [$2$]{}; at (-4,-0.75) [$3$]{}; at (5,-0.75) [$n$]{}; (-5.north WesT) recTAngLe (-5.souTh easT); (-4.norTh West) rEctangLe (-4.souTh East); (-3.north west) reCtanGle (-3.south eAst); (-2.NoRth WeSt) recTAngle (-2.sOutH eaSt); (-1.north West) recTAngLe (-1.SOUTh East); (1.north west) rectaNgLE (1.SoUth east); (2.nOrth weST) rEcTAngle (2.souTh EasT); (-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (
 of $\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapp ed to an o pposi teby$\ thet a$.It is then eas y  tosee that there is also  a no n- d omes t ic  coty pe $1$p an e l  (b yares id u eargum ent ) and h ence $\the ta$  i s strongly e x ce ptional do mes tic. Now sup pos e that  t hea bsolu tepoint s of $ \ theta$  form a u ni o n of t w o hyper p l an es,and that the fixe d  p o int set $F$ of  $\the ta $  i s a $ k$- space with  $ k=n-1 + j$ fors om e $ 0\l e q j\leq n-3$.  An argumen t  as  in th epre v ious p aragr ap h  sh ows that th ereis a non- domest i c point $p$ suc h that  $p ^{\ perp } $in ter se c ts$ F$  in an$(n-2+j) $- sp ace.By i n d u c tion , w ithLemma  \[lem:CBase3 \]as t h e b ase c ase,theco lline ation$\the ta _p$ of the $\sC _{n- 1}(2)$ bu ild in g $ \m athrm { Res}(p )$has  diagra m

at ( 0 ,0. 3) ; at  (-5,0) (-5) [$\bu ll e t $] {}; at ( -4,0)( -4 )[ $\bullet $] {};  at( - 3,0)(-3) [$ \bullet$ ]{}; a t  ( -2 ,0) (-2 )[$\bul le t$] {};  at ( - 1,0)  (-1)[$\bulle t$]{} ;  at (1,0) (1)[ $\bullet$]{}; at ( 2, 0 ) (2 ) [ $\bullet$]{ }; a t  (3, 0) ( 3 )[$\ b ullet $]{};  a t  ( 4 ,0) (4) [$\bullet$] {} ; at ( 5,0)(5) [$\bullet $]{}; at ( 2 , - 0.75) [$ n-j$ ] {} ;  at (-5,-0.75)  [$2$ ]{}; at (- 4 ,-0.75)[$3$] {}; at ( 5,-0.75)[ $ n$]{}; ( -5. nor thwes t )  r ectangle (-5. s o uthea st); (- 4.n orth we st)  re cta ngl e(-4.south  east);(- 3. no rt h w est)r ectangle  ( -3. so uth  east ) ; (-2. north  wes t)  r e cta ngle (- 2 .s o u th e as t) ; (- 1.n or th we st)r ect angle ( -1.southeas t ); ( 1. no rth wes t) rectangle(1 .south eas t) ; ( 2.nort h west) re ctangle (2.south east); (-5,0)– (-0 .5,0) ; (0 .5,0)–(4, 0);  (4,0. 07) – (5,0.0 7); (
 of_$\mathsf{C}_n(2)$ mapped_to an opposite by_$\theta$. It_is_then easy_to_see that there_is also a_non-domestic cotype $1$ panel_(by a residue_argument)_and hence $\theta$ is strongly exceptional domestic. Now suppose that the absolute points of_$\theta$_form a_union_of_two hyperplanes, and that the_fixed point set $F$ of_$\theta$ is_a $k$-space with $k=n-1+j$ for some $0\leq j\leq_n-3$._An argument as_in the previous paragraph shows that there is a_non-domestic point $p$ such that $p^{\perp}$_intersects $F$ in_an_$(n-2+j)$-space._By induction, with Lemma \[lem:CBase3\]_as the base case, the collineation_$\theta_p$ of the $\sC_{n-1}(2)$ building $\mathrm{Res}(p)$_has diagram

at (0,0.3) ; at (-5,0) (-5)_[$\bullet$]{}; at (-4,0) (-4) [$\bullet$]{}; at_(-3,0) (-3) [$\bullet$]{}; at (-2,0)_(-2) [$\bullet$]{};_at (-1,0) (-1) [$\bullet$]{}; at_(1,0) (1) [$\bullet$]{};_at (2,0)_(2) [$\bullet$]{}; at_(3,0) (3) [$\bullet$]{}; at (4,0) (4)_[$\bullet$]{}; at (5,0)_(5) [$\bullet$]{}; at (2,-0.75) [$n-j$]{}; at_(-5,-0.75)_[$2$]{}; at (-4,-0.75)_[$3$]{};_at_(5,-0.75) [$n$]{};_(-5.north west) rectangle_(-5.south_east); (-4.north_west)_rectangle (-4.south east); (-3.north west) rectangle_(-3.south_east); (-2.north west) rectangle (-2.south east); (-1.north_west) rectangle (-1.south east);_(1.north_west) rectangle (1.south east);_(2.north west) rectangle (2.south east);_(-5,0)–(-0.5,0); (0.5,0)–(4,0); (4,0.07)–(5,0.07); (