 a Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM) were used to derive a median seeing value of $1\farcs2$ [@Aristidi03]. Later on, using a Multi-Aperture Scintillation Sensor (MASS) and a Sonic radar (SODAR) in automated mode during wintertime, @Lawrence04 reported a median seeing of $0\farcs27$. The isoplanatic angle $\theta_0$ and coherence time $\tau_0$ were also derived from MASS measurements, with average values of $5\farcs7$ and 7.9 msec respectively. For comparison, the corresponding values at Cerro Paranal are $\theta_0=2\farcs5$ and $\tau_0=3.3$ msec. These outstanding atmospheric conditions are however valid only above 30 m, as the SODAR measures the distribution of turbulence in an atmospheric layer comprised between 30 and 900 m above the ground, while the MASS is insensitive to seeing below about 500 m.

These first results suggest that most of the atmospheric turbulence is concentrated in a thin boundary layer, about 30 m thick. The simultaneous use of two DIMMs at different heights (3 m and 8 m above the ice surface) further confirms this fact, showing that half of the turbulence is concentrated into the first 5 m above the surface [@Aristidi05]. A similar behaviour had already been reported at the South Pole, where SODAR measurements showed that turbulence was mostly confined to a boundary layer sitting below 270 m [@Travouillon03]. This behaviour can be explained by the horizontal katabatic wind, whose altitude profile closely matches the turbulence profile.

In 2005, the first winter-over mission at Dome C has allowed DIMM measurements and balloon-borne thermal measurements to be obtained during the long Antarctic night. Preliminary results reported by @Agabi06 confirm the two-layered structure of atmospheric turbulence at Dome C. A 36-m thick surface layer is responsible for 87% of the turbulence, resulting in a total seeing of $1\farcs9 \pm 0\farcs5$, while the very stable free atmosphere has a median seeing of $0\farcs36
\pm 0\farcs19$ above 30 m. This value is remarkably similar to the median free air seeing of $0\farcs32$ reported
a Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM) were used to derive a median seeing value of $ 1\farcs2 $ [ @Aristidi03 ]. subsequently along, using a Multi - Aperture Scintillation Sensor (MASS) and a Sonic radar (SODAR) in automated mood during winter, @Lawrence04 reported a median seeing of $ 0\farcs27$. The isoplanatic slant $ \theta_0 $ and coherence prison term $ \tau_0 $ were also deduce from MASS measurements, with average value of $ 5\farcs7 $ and 7.9   msec respectively. For comparison, the corresponding values at Cerro Paranal are $ \theta_0=2\farcs5 $ and $ \tau_0=3.3 $   millisecond. These outstanding atmospheric conditions are however valid only above 30   m, as the SODAR measures the distribution of turbulence in an atmospheric layer comprised between 30 and 900   m above the land, while the MASS is insensitive to seeing below about 500   m. 

 These beginning results suggest that most of the atmospheric turbulence is concentrated in a thin boundary level, about 30   m chummy. The simultaneous use of two DIMMs at different height (3   m and 8   m above the ice surface) further confirms this fact, showing that one-half of the turbulence is concentrate into the first 5   m above the surface [ @Aristidi05 ]. A similar behaviour had already been reported at the South Pole, where SODAR measurements showed that turbulence was mostly confined to a boundary level seat below 270   m [ @Travouillon03 ]. This behaviour can be excuse by the horizontal katabatic wind, whose altitude profile closely match the turbulence profile. 

 In 2005, the first winter - over mission at Dome   C has allowed DIMM measurement and balloon - borne thermal measurements to be obtained during the long Antarctic night. Preliminary results reported by @Agabi06 confirm the two - layered structure of atmospheric turbulence at Dome   C. A 36 - m thick surface level is responsible for 87% of the turbulence, result in a total seeing of $ 1\farcs9 \pm 0\farcs5 $, while the very stable free atmosphere have a median seeing of $ 0\farcs36 
 \pm 0\farcs19 $ above 30   m. This value is remarkably exchangeable to the median free air seeing of $ 0\farcs32 $ reported
 a Fifferential Image Motiok Monitor (DIMM) wgrw used to dedive a mddian seeing value of $1\farcs2$ [@Erisridi03]. Oater on, using a Multi-Xperture Dcintillqtioi Sensor (MASS) anv a Sonig radzv (SODCR) in automated kode durinc wintertime, @Ldwfeuce04 reported a median seeing of $0\farcf27$. The ixoolanatic angle $\theua_0$ wnd doherence time $\tau_0$ were also derivsd from MASS measurekents, with average values lf $5\fwrcs7$ and 7.9 msec respfctively. Fot coiparison, the zorrespondpug values aj Cerro Paranal are $\theta_0=2\farcs5$ avd $\tab_0=3.3$ msec. These oytshdnding atmowpherpc conditions are howaver vakid only above 30 m, es tye SODAR measures the distribution of torbulence hn an atmospheric lqywr cokprived cwtwden 30 end 900 m aboge vhe ground, shile the MQSS is insensitive uo fvring below agout 500 m.

Ehqse first results suggest that most of uhe afmospheric turbulence iw concentrated in a tjin boundwry layer, about 30 m thick. The simultaneous use of tfo DIJOs cb aufverent heights (3 m and 8 m above the ice surface) shruheg confirms this fcct, showing that hwlg of the turbuuence na doncentrated into hhe firft 5 m qbove the surgace [@Aristidi05]. A similar behqviour had ajeeady been reporteb at the Souch Polg, wherr SODAR measurements shuwed that turbupence was oostly confined go s toundary layer sitting beljw 270 m [@Traviuilkon03]. Thir benaviouw can be edplaikad by the horizontwl kajabatiw wind, whode altitude profile closely matries the turbuketce profile.

Nn 2005, thc first winter-oder mission at Dome C kas aluowed DIMM measurxments and bwlloon-borne tvgrmal measurekents to be ibtauned dufkng the long Amtarctic unght. Preluminary results reiortea by @Agabi06 confixo the two-layered stfuceuge pf dtmospheric durbjlevve at Dome C. A 36-m bhizk sirface layer is respmnsigle for 87% of the tutbmlence, rewulting yn a total sering of $1\farcs9 \pm 0\fwrcs5$, xhile vhe vety ftable free atmosphere has a msdian seelng of $0\farcs36
\pm 0\sarcw19$ above 30 m. Thns value is remarkably similar to the mevian free air seeing of $0\farcs32$ reported
a Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM) were derive median seeing of $1\farcs2$ [@Aristidi03]. Scintillation (MASS) and a radar (SODAR) in mode during wintertime, @Lawrence04 reported a seeing of $0\farcs27$. The isoplanatic angle $\theta_0$ and coherence time $\tau_0$ were also from MASS measurements, with average values of $5\farcs7$ and 7.9 msec respectively. For the values Cerro are $\theta_0=2\farcs5$ and $\tau_0=3.3$ msec. These outstanding atmospheric conditions are however valid only above 30 m, the SODAR measures the distribution of turbulence in atmospheric layer comprised between and 900 m above the while MASS is to below 500 m. These results suggest that most of the atmospheric turbulence is concentrated in a thin boundary layer, about 30 thick. The of two at heights m and 8 the ice surface) further confirms this half of the turbulence is concentrated into the 5 m the surface [@Aristidi05]. A similar behaviour already been reported at the South Pole, where measurements showed that turbulence was mostly confined to a boundary layer sitting below 270 m behaviour can be explained the horizontal katabatic whose profile matches turbulence profile. 2005, the first winter-over mission at Dome C has allowed DIMM and balloon-borne thermal measurements to be obtained during the long Preliminary reported by @Agabi06 the two-layered structure of turbulence Dome C. A 36-m layer responsible the resulting a total seeing of \pm 0\farcs5$, while the very free atmosphere has a 0\farcs19$ above 30 m. This value is remarkably to the median free air seeing of reported
 a Differential Image Motion MOnitor (DIMM) Were uSed To dErIve a MediAn seeing value oF $1\FarcS2$ [@Aristidi03]. Later on, using a multi-apERturE scIntilLation SENsOR (mASs) aNd A SoNiC RaDar (SOdAR) In automAted mode duRinG wIntertime, @LawREnCe04 reported A meDian seeing of $0\FarCs27$. The iSoPlaNAtic aNglE $\thetA_0$ and coHErence Time $\tau_0$ weRe ALso derIVed from masS MeasUrements, with averaGE vALues of $5\farcs7$ and 7.9 Msec reSpECtIVEly. for Comparison, ThE corrESpondinG VaLUES at cErro Paranal arE $\theta_0=2\farcs5$ ANd $\tAu_0=3.3$ msec. thEse OUtstanDing aTmOSphEric conditiOns aRe however Valid oNLy above 30 M, As the SOdAR meaSurEs tHe diSTrIbUtiOn OF tuRBuLenCE in An atmospHeRiC layeR comPRISEd beTweEn 30 anD 900 m aboVe the ground, whIle The MasS iS inseNsitiVe to SeEing bElow abOut 500 m.

THeSe first results sUggeSt that mosT of ThE atMoSpherIC turbuLenCe iS concenTrated iN A thIn BOUNdAry layer, about 30 m thicK. THE SiMultaneoUs use oF TwO DimMs at difFeRenT heiGHTs (3 m anD 8 m abOVe The ice suRface) fURtHeR confirMs This faCt, ShoWinG that HAlf oF the tuRbulence Is conCEntrated into thE First 5 m above thE SuRFAcE [@arisTidI05]. A similar beHaviOUr haD alrEAdY beEN repoRted aT tHE SOUth Pole, where SODAR meAsUremenTs shoWed that turbulEnce was mosTLY Confined To a bOUnDAry layer sittinG beloW 270 m [@TravouilLOn03]. This beHavioUr can be eXplained bY THe horizoNtaL kaTabAtiC WInD, whose altitudE PRofiLe Closely MatChes the TurBulEncE prOfIle.

In 2005, the fIrst wintEr-OvEr MiSsiOn at DOMe C has alLoWed dImM mEasurEMents aNd balLoon-BoRnE TheRmal meaSUrEMEnts To Be ObtaIneD dUring The lONg ANtarctiC night. PreLimINary ReSuLts repoRted by @Agabi06 coNfIrm the two-lAyEreD strucTURe of atmoSpheric turbulence at Dome c. a 36-m thick SurFace lAyer Is responsIblE for 87% of The TUrbuleNce, resUltinG iN a tOTAl seeING oF $1\faRcS9 \pm 0\farcs5$, whILE thE very StAble Free atmOsphere has a median sEEinG of $0\farcs36
\pm 0\farCs19$ aBove 30 M. tHiS vaLUe IS reMaRKabLY Similar to the medIan free air SeEInG of $0\farcs32$ rePOrtEd
 a Differential Image Moti on Monitor  (DIM M)wer eused  toderive a media n  see ing value of $1\farcs2 $ [@A ri s tidi 0 3] . Lat er on,u si n g  aMu lt i-A pe r tu re Sc int illatio n Sensor ( MAS S)  and a Sonic ra dar (SODAR ) i n automatedmod e duri ng  wi n terti me,  @Law rence0 4  repor ted a med ia n  seein g  of $0\ f a rc s27$ . The isoplanatic an g le $\theta_0$and co he r en c e  ti me$\tau_0$ w er e als o  derive d  f r o m  MA S S measurement s, with ave r age  value sof$ 5\farc s7$ a nd 7.9  msec respe ctiv ely. Forcompar i son, th e  corres pondin g v alu es a t  C er roPa r ana l  a re$ \th eta_0=2\ fa rc s5$ a nd $ \ t a u _0=3 .3$  mse c. Th ese outstandi ngatmo s phe ric c ondit ions  a re ho wevervalid  o nly above 30 m,  asthe SODAR  me as ure sthe d i stribu tio n o f turbu lence i n  an  a t m o sp heric layer compri se d be tween 30  and 9 0 0ma bove the  g rou nd,w h ile t he M A SS  is inse nsitiv e  t oseeingbe low ab ou t 5 00m.

T h esefirstresultssugge s t that most of the atmospher i ct u rb u lenc e i s concentra tedi n athin bo und a ry la yer,ab o ut 30 m thick. The sim ul taneou s use  of two DIMMs  at differ e n t  heights  (3m  a n d 8 m above th e ice  surface)f urther c onfir ms thisfact, sho w i ng thathal f o f t het u rb ulence is con c e ntra te d intothe  first5 m  ab ove  th esurface [ @Aristid i0 5] .Asim ilarb ehaviour  h adal rea dy be e n repo rtedat t he  S o uth  Pole,w he r e  SOD AR  m easu rem en ts sh owed tha t turbu lence was  mo s tlyco nf ined to  a boundary l ay er sitting  b elo w 270m [@Travou illon03]. This behaviou r  can be  ex plain ed b y the hor izo ntal k ata b atic w ind, w hoseal tit u d e pro f i le  cl os ely matche s the  turb ul ence  profil e.

In 2005, the f i rst  winter-overmis sion a tDom e  C has  a l low e d  DIMM measureme nts and ba ll o on -borne the r mal  m easurem ents to  be o b tainedduring th e long An ta rcti c nig ht. Prelim inary re sults rep o rtedb y@Agab i06  confi rm  th e two -layer e d s truct ure of  a tmosph erictu rbulence  at Dome C. A 36-m thic k surf ace l aye r is resp ons i ble  for 87%of t he turbule nce , r esult ing in atota l  s eei n g of$1\f a rcs9 \pm0 \f arc s 5 $,  while thev e r y s table  fr e e atmo sphe re has a median s e eing of $0\far cs36 \ pm0\f a rcs1 9$  above 30 m. T his  v a l ue is re ma rkably simi lar to t he media n free  air s eeing o f $0 \ farcs3 2$ r epo rted
 a_Differential Image_Motion Monitor (DIMM) were_used to_derive_a median_seeing_value of $1\farcs2$_[@Aristidi03]. Later on,_using a Multi-Aperture Scintillation_Sensor (MASS) and_a_Sonic radar (SODAR) in automated mode during wintertime, @Lawrence04 reported a median seeing of_$0\farcs27$._The isoplanatic_angle_$\theta_0$_and coherence time $\tau_0$ were_also derived from MASS measurements,_with average_values of $5\farcs7$ and 7.9 msec respectively. For comparison,_the_corresponding values at_Cerro Paranal are $\theta_0=2\farcs5$ and $\tau_0=3.3$ msec. These outstanding atmospheric_conditions are however valid only above_30 m, as the_SODAR_measures_the distribution of turbulence_in an atmospheric layer comprised between_30 and 900 m above the ground,_while the MASS is insensitive to seeing_below about 500 m.

These first results suggest_that most of the atmospheric_turbulence is_concentrated in a thin boundary_layer, about 30 m_thick. The_simultaneous use of_two DIMMs at different heights (3 m_and 8 m above_the ice surface) further confirms this_fact,_showing that half_of_the_turbulence is_concentrated into the_first_5 m above_the_surface [@Aristidi05]. A similar behaviour had_already_been reported at the South Pole, where_SODAR measurements showed that_turbulence_was mostly confined to_a boundary layer sitting below_270 m [@Travouillon03]. This behaviour can be_explained by_the horizontal_katabatic wind, whose altitude profile closely matches the turbulence profile.

In 2005,_the first winter-over mission at Dome C_has allowed DIMM measurements_and balloon-borne_thermal_measurements to be_obtained_during the_long Antarctic night. Preliminary results reported by_@Agabi06 confirm_the two-layered structure of atmospheric turbulence_at Dome C. A 36-m_thick_surface layer is responsible for 87%_of the turbulence, resulting in a_total seeing of $1\farcs9 \pm_0\farcs5$,_while_the very stable free atmosphere_has a median seeing of $0\farcs36
\pm_0\farcs19$ above 30 m._This value is remarkably similar to the_median_free air seeing of $0\farcs32$ reported