 are Old Texts.
 Forged Old Texts
 This only concerns the rediscovered version of Classic of History.  During the Jin Dynasty (265–420), Mei Ze, a minor official discovered a preface by Kong Anguo and 25 chapters that he claimed were the Old Texts. Suspicions emerged during the Song dynasty but it was not proven until Yan Ruoju circulated his thesis in the Qing dynasty.  Recent archaeological recoveries of ancient classics have backed Yan.  Huangfu Mi, Wang Su, or Mei Ze himself is suspected as the forger.
 Received Texts
 The version that has been transmitted to the present.  It includes the Old Text version of Changes and Poetry, the New Text version of the Yili, a combined version of the Analects, and the New Text version of History with the 25 forged chapters.

Controversy among new schools
By the time of 1st century, a new controversy had begun between these two texts. The "new texts" are those that had been transliterated into the new orthography back in the beginning of 2nd century BC, either from oral transmissions or from texts that had survived the Qin Dynasty’s burning of the books or were rescued by the Han Dynasty in the provinces. Surviving scholars in the direct line of transmission of these books got hold of surviving copies and transliterated them into the new orthography.

The "old texts" were the ones that off and on since the late 2nd and during the 1st century BC had turned up, some discovered in the walls of Confucius’s residence, or in Warring States period graves. They were called the “old texts” because they were written in the pre-Qin writing. The discoverers of the "old texts", such as Liu Xin, claimed that all existing texts suffered from an interrupted pedigree, which was rectified by the newly discovered texts.  "New text" followers claim the "old texts" are forgeries that lack a line of transmission.

In reality, the burning of the books probably did little more than symbolically burn a few copies of the Confucian books conveniently at hand in the capital. Many other copies survived elsewhere, and these were available for copying into the new orthographic standard set by Qin and its clerical script successor which evolved under Han Dynasty. It was the change in orthography which divided the Warring States and
are Old Texts. 
  Forged Old Texts 
  This only concerns the rediscovered version of Classic of History.   During the Jin Dynasty (265–420), Mei Ze, a minor official discovered a foreword by Kong Anguo and 25 chapter that he claimed were the Old Texts. Suspicions emerge during the Song dynasty but it was not prove until Yan Ruoju circulated his thesis in the Qing dynasty.   late archaeological recoveries of ancient classics have backed Yan.   Huangfu Mi, Wang Su, or Mei Ze himself is suspect as the forger. 
  Received Texts 
  The version that has been transmit to the present.   It includes the Old Text version of Changes and Poetry, the New Text translation of the Yili, a blend version of the Analects, and the New Text version of History with the 25 forged chapters. 

 Controversy among new school 
 By the time of 1st century, a modern controversy had begun between these two texts. The " new texts " are those that had been transliterate into the new orthography back in the beginning of second century BC, either from oral transmissions or from texts that had survived the Qin Dynasty ’s combustion of the books or were rescued by the Han Dynasty in the provinces. Surviving scholars in the lineal channel of transmission of these books got hold of surviving copies and transliterated them into the new orthography. 

 The " old text " were the ones that off and along since the belated 2nd and during the first century BC had turned up, some discovered in the walls of Confucius ’s residence, or in Warring States period graves. They were called the “ previous texts ” because they were written in the pre - Qin writing. The discoverers of the " old texts ", such as Liu Xin, claimed that all exist texts suffered from an interrupted pedigree, which was refine by the newly fall upon texts.   " New text " followers claim the " old textbook " are forgeries that lack a line of transmittance. 

 In reality, the burning of the books probably dress little more than symbolically sunburn a few copies of the Confucian bible conveniently at hired hand in the capital. Many early copies survived elsewhere, and these were available for replicate into the new orthographic standard set up by Qin and its clerical script successor which evolve under Han Dynasty. It was the change in orthography which divide the Warring States and
 arf Old Texts.
 Forged Old Ttxts
 This only couxerns vhe redjscoverea version of Classic of Histlrt.  Dueing the Jin Dynasty (265–420), Oei Ze, a linor ofdiciel discovered a 'deface nv Konf Angbo and 25 chapters that he cnaimed were tha Ulb Texts. Suspicions emerged during thq Song cyjasty but it wws npe prknek until Yan Ruoju circulated his thesis in the Qing cynasty.  Recent archaeologlcal recoveries of anclent classixs hwce backed Yav.  Huangfu Mi, Wang Su, kr Mei Ze himself is suspected xs thz forger.
 Rexeuvef Texts
 The tersiog that has bcvn tranvmitted to the presenb.  It inxludes the Old Text vxrsion of Changes anq Poetry, dhz New Text version of tye Yini, a comcunea vtrsmon of thf Aialects, and the New Tezt version of Histoty qith the 25 forfed chwpeers.

Controversy among new schools
By the tije of 1st century, a new xontroversy had begun between ehese two texts. The "new texts" are those that had teen vrxnsoiberagwd into the new orthography back in the beginnigf pf 2nd century BC, either frok lrsj transmissiovs or ydoj texts that had skrvived the Win Dynasuy’s birning of the books or were rescued by nhe Yan Dynasty in the provinces. Rurvoving scholars in the direct lins of transmlssion of ghese books got folc mf surviving copies and trwnsliteraved tkem into the new owthography.

Hhe "old texts" were the ojes tkat oxf and on dince the late 2nd and during thx 1st century NC hag turned up, spme discovereq in the walls of Conyucius’r residencv, or in Werring Statef period gravad. They were ralled thq “ole tezts” becxjse they were eritten iu the pre-Qin writing. Thc diszkverers of the "ild texts", such as Kiu Xig, blammed evat all exisding tebys suwfered from xn imterrupted pedigree, fhicg was rectified by tme newly eiscoverqd texts.  "New text" followers clwim tie "old textx" ate forgeries that lack a line or transmidsijn.

In reality, the burning of che books probably did little more than wymbolically burn q few copies of the Gonfucian bopks cjnvenientny at hand in the capital. Many other gopies survived elsewhsre, ang thede were available for copying into the new orthographic standard set by Qun and its clericam sctipt vuecexsor wrich xvolved under Han Dynasty. It was the change in octhography wkich divided the Warring Statrs and
are Old Texts. Forged Old Texts This the version of of History. During Ze, minor official discovered preface by Kong and 25 chapters that he claimed the Old Texts. Suspicions emerged during the Song dynasty but it was not until Yan Ruoju circulated his thesis in the Qing dynasty. Recent archaeological recoveries ancient have Yan. Mi, Wang Su, or Mei Ze himself is suspected as the forger. Received Texts The version has been transmitted to the present. It includes Old Text version of and Poetry, the New Text of Yili, a version the and the New version of History with the 25 forged chapters. Controversy among new schools By the time of 1st a new begun between two The texts" are those been transliterated into the new orthography beginning of 2nd century BC, either from oral or from that had survived the Qin Dynasty’s of the books or were rescued by the Dynasty in the provinces. Surviving scholars in the direct line of transmission of these books of surviving copies and them into the orthography. "old were ones that and on since the late 2nd and during the 1st century had turned up, some discovered in the walls of Confucius’s in States period graves. were called the “old because were written in the The of such Liu claimed that all existing suffered from an interrupted pedigree, was rectified by the followers claim the "old texts" are forgeries that a line of transmission. In reality, the of the books probably did little more than symbolically burn a few of the conveniently at hand in the capital. Many other survived elsewhere, and these available for copying into the new orthographic standard set Qin its clerical successor which evolved Han Dynasty. It the change in divided the States
 are Old Texts.
 Forged Old Texts
 this only coNcernS thE reDiScovEred Version of ClassIC of HIstory.  During the Jin DynaSty (265–420), MeI ZE, A minOR oFficiAl discoVErED A prEfAcE by koNG ANguo aNd 25 cHapters That he claiMed WeRe the Old TextS. suSpicions emErgEd during the SOng DynastY bUt iT Was noT prOven uNtil YaN ruoju cIrculated HiS Thesis IN the QinG DYnAsty.  recent archaeologiCAl REcoveries of ancIent clAsSIcS HAve BacKed Yan.  HuanGfU Mi, WaNG Su, or MeI ze HIMSelF Is suspected as The forger.
 ReCEivEd TextS
 THe vERsion tHat haS bEEn tRansmitted tO the Present.  It IncludES the Old tExt versIon of CHanGes And POEtRy, The neW texT VeRsiON of The Yili, a CoMbIned vErsiON OF The ANalEcts, And thE New Text versiOn oF HisTOry With tHe 25 forGed cHaPters.

controVersy AmOng new schools
By The tIme of 1st ceNtuRy, A neW cOntroVErsy haD beGun Between These twO TexTs. tHE "NeW texts" are those that HaD BEeN transliTerateD InTo THe new ortHoGraPhy bACK in thE begINnIng of 2nd cEntury bc, eItHer from OrAl tranSmIssIonS or frOM texTs that Had surviVed thE qin Dynasty’s burNIng of the books OR wERE rEScueD by The Han DynasTy in THe prOvinCEs. surVIving ScholArS In THe direct line of transMiSsion oF thesE books got hold Of survivinG COPies and tRansLItERated them into tHe new OrthographY.

the "old teXts" weRe the oneS that off aND On since tHe lAte 2Nd aNd dURInG the 1st century bc Had tUrNed up, soMe dIscoverEd iN thE waLls Of confucius’S residenCe, Or In waRriNg StaTEs period GrAveS. THey Were cALled thE “old tExts” BeCaUSe tHey were WRiTTEn in ThE pRe-QiN wrItIng. ThE disCOveRers of tHe "old textS", suCH as LIu xiN, claimeD that all existInG texts suffErEd fRom an iNTErrupted Pedigree, which was rectifiED by the nEwlY discOverEd texts.  "NeW teXt" follOweRS claim The "old Texts" ArE foRGEries THAt LacK a Line of tranSMIssIon.

In ReAlitY, the burNing of the books probABly Did little more ThaN symBOLiCalLY bURn a FeW CopIES of the Confucian Books conveNiENtLy at hand in THe cApItal. ManY other cOpies SUrvived Elsewhere, And these wErE avaILAblE for copyinG into the New orthogRAphic STaNdard Set By Qin aNd Its CleriCal scrIPt sUccesSor whiCh EvolveD undeR HAn DynastY. It was the change in orthogRaphy wHich dIviDed the WarRinG staTes and
 are Old Texts.
 Forged Ol d Texts
 T his o nly  co nc erns  the  rediscoveredv ersi on of Classic of Histo ry. Du r ingt he  JinDynasty (2 6 5 –42 0) ,Mei  Z e ,a min orofficia l discover edapreface by K o ng  Anguo and  25  chapters th athe cla im edw ere t heOld T exts.S uspici ons emerg ed during the Son g dy nast y but it was notp ro v en until Yan R uoju c ir c ul a t edhis  thesis in  t he Qi n g dynas t y. R ece n t archaeologi cal recover i esof anc ie ntc lassic s hav eb ack ed Yan.  Hu angf u Mi, Wan g Su,o r Mei Z e  himsel f is s usp ect ed a s  t he  fo rg e r.Re cei v edTexts
 T he  v ersio n th a t h as b een  tra nsmit ted to the pr ese nt.Itinclu des t he O ld  Text  versi on of  C hanges and Poet ry,the New T ext  v ers io n oft he Yil i,a c ombined  versio n  of  t h e An alects, and the Ne wT e xt  version  of Hi s to ry with the  2 5 f orge d chapt ers. 
C ontrover sy amo n gne w schoo ls 
By th etim e o f 1st cent ury, a  new con trove r sy had begun b e tween these t w ot e xt s . Th e " new texts"aret hose  tha t  h adb een t ransl it e ra t ed into the new ort ho graphy  back  in the begin ning of 2n d c entury B C, e i th e r from oral tr ansmi ssions orf rom text s tha t had su rvived th e Qin Dyna sty ’sbur nin g of  the books or w erere scued b y t he HanDyn ast y i n t he  province s. Survi vi ng  s ch ola rs in the dire ct  li ne  of  tran s missio n ofthes ebo o ksgot hol d  o f surv iv in g co pie sand t rans l ite rated t hem intothe newor th ography .

The "old t ex ts" were t he  on es tha t off andon since the late 2nd a n d durin g t he 1s t ce ntury BChad  turne d u p , some  disco vered  i n t h e  wall s of  Co nf ucius’s re s i den ce, o rin W arringStates period grav e s.They were cal led  the “ ol d t e xt s ” b ec a use t hey were writte n in the p re - Qi n writing. The  d iscover ers ofthe " o ld text s", suchas Liu Xi n,  cla i m edthat all e xistingtexts suf f eredf ro m anint errupt ed  pe digre e, whi c h w as re ctifie dby the  newl ydiscover ed texts.  "New text" f ollowe rs cl aim  the "old  te x ts"  are forg erie s that lac k a  li ne of  tr a nsmis sion . 
Inr ealit y, t h e burning of  th e bo oks probabl y d idlittl e m o re tha n sy mbolically burn a few copies oftheC o nfu cia n  boo ks  convenientlyatha n d  in theca pital. Many  other c op i es su rvived  elsew here, a n d  t h ese we re a vai lable for  co py i ng into  t he new or thog ra phic s tandar d  set b y Qin and its cl erica l scrip t  su ccess or  whiche volv ed under H an Dynasty.  It wa s th e cha nge inor thogra phy  w hich divid e d the War ringStatesan d
 are_Old Texts.
_Forged Old Texts
 This_only concerns_the_rediscovered version_of_Classic of History._ During the_Jin Dynasty (265–420), Mei_Ze, a minor_official_discovered a preface by Kong Anguo and 25 chapters that he claimed were the_Old_Texts. Suspicions_emerged_during_the Song dynasty but it_was not proven until Yan_Ruoju circulated_his thesis in the Qing dynasty.  Recent_archaeological_recoveries of ancient_classics have backed Yan.  Huangfu Mi, Wang Su,_or Mei Ze himself is suspected_as the forger.
_Received_Texts
_The version that has_been transmitted to the present. _It includes the Old Text version_of Changes and Poetry, the New Text_version of the Yili, a combined_version of the Analects, and_the New_Text version of History with_the 25 forged_chapters.

Controversy among_new schools
By the_time of 1st century, a new_controversy had begun_between these two texts. The "new_texts"_are those that_had_been_transliterated into_the new orthography_back_in the_beginning_of 2nd century BC, either from_oral_transmissions or from texts that had survived_the Qin Dynasty’s burning_of_the books or were_rescued by the Han Dynasty_in the provinces. Surviving scholars in_the direct_line of_transmission of these books got hold of surviving copies and transliterated_them into the new orthography.

The "old_texts" were the ones_that off_and_on since the_late_2nd and_during the 1st century BC had turned_up, some_discovered in the walls of Confucius’s_residence, or in Warring_States_period graves. They were called the_“old texts” because they were written_in the pre-Qin writing. The_discoverers_of_the "old texts", such as_Liu Xin, claimed that all existing_texts suffered from_an interrupted pedigree, which was rectified by_the_newly discovered texts.  "New text"_followers_claim the "old texts" are forgeries_that_lack_a line of transmission.

In reality,_the burning of the books probably_did little more than symbolically burn a few copies_of the Confucian_books conveniently at hand in_the_capital._Many other copies survived elsewhere, and these were available for_copying into_the new orthographic_standard set by Qin and its clerical script successor which_evolved under Han Dynasty. It was the_change in orthography which divided the Warring States and