. If the senate gave its approval, then in practice, the people were unlikely to reject the nominee. The formal election of the king by the people, however, did serve to confirm to the senate that the people (many of whom fought in the armies that were commanded by the king) found their new potential commander-in-chief to be acceptable. After the senate gave its final approval, the Interrex declared the individual king, and then returned to the ranks of the senate. In effect, the senate chose the king, the people ratified that choice, and the senate finalized the decision.

See also

References

 Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics ().
 Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office, Senate Document 103-23.
 Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on the Commonwealth; and his Treatise on the Laws. Translated from the original, with Dissertations and Notes in Two Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq. London: Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1.
 Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press ().

 Polybius (1823). The General History of Polybius: Translated from the Greek. By James Hampton. Oxford: Printed by W. Baxter. Fifth Edition, Vol 2.
 Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. The University of Michigan Press ().

Notes

Further reading

 Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches Into the History of the Roman Constitution. William Pickering. 1853. 
 Johnston, Harold Whetstone. Orations and Letters of Cicero: With Historical Introduction, An Outline of the Roman Constitution, Notes, Vocabulary and Index. Scott, Foresman and Company. 1891.
 Mommsen, Theodor. Roman Constitutional Law. 1871-1888
 Tighe, Ambrose. The Development of the Roman Constitution. D. Apple & Co. 1886.
 Von Fritz, Kurt. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. Columbia University Press, New York. 1975.
 The Histories by Polybius

. If the senate gave its approval, then in practice, the people were improbable to resist the nominee. The formal election of the king by the multitude, however, did serve to confirm to the senate that the people (many of whom crusade in the army that were commanded by the king) found their new likely commander - in - chief to be acceptable. After the senate gave its concluding approval, the Interrex declared the individual baron, and then returned to the rank of the senate. In effect, the senate chose the king, the people sign that choice, and the senate finalized the decisiveness. 

 See besides 

 References 

  Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics (). 
  Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office, Senate Document 103 - 23. 
  Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on the Commonwealth; and his Treatise on the Laws. Translated from the original, with Dissertations and Notes in Two Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq. London: Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1. 
  Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press (). 

  Polybius (1823). The General History of Polybius: Translated from the Greek. By James Hampton. Oxford: Printed by W. Baxter. Fifth Edition, Vol 2. 
  Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. The University of Michigan Press (). 

 Notes 

 Further read 

  Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches Into the History of the Roman Constitution. William Pickering. 1853. 
  Johnston, Harold Whetstone. Orations and Letters of Cicero: With Historical Introduction, An Outline of the Roman Constitution, Notes, Vocabulary and Index. Scott, Foresman and Company. 1891. 
  Mommsen, Theodor. Roman Constitutional Law. 1871 - 1888 
  Tighe, Ambrose. The Development of the Roman Constitution. D. Apple & Co. 1886. 
  Von Fritz, Kurt. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. Columbia University Press, New York. 1975. 
  The Histories by Polybius
. If the senate gave its appvoval, then in prcxtice, vhe peolle were unlikely to reject the nomiiee. Rhe firmal election of the ying by tje peoplw, hoxever, did serve vk confivi to bhe sznete that the pepple (many mf whom fought iv che armies that were commanded by thq king) goknd their new kotenuiaj cojmander-in-chief to be acceptable. Affer the senate gave ots final approval, the Intfrred declared the indlvidual kint, anq then returndd to the gcnks of the senate. In effect, the senate chuse tke king, the pwoppg ratified tiat chjice, and the senate xinalizrd the decisiok.

See elso

Eeferences

 Abbott, Fraik Frost (1901). A History wnd Descrhpcion of Roman Politicql Insthtuthons. Wlicroh Rlaasics ().
 Bycd, Robert (1995). Fhe Senate if the Roman Republoc. L.X. Government Printynd Office, Senate Document 103-23.
 Cicero, Marcus Tumlius (1841). The Political Woeks of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Cjmprising his Treatise on the Commonwealth; and hiv Treetkse ok thd Lwws. Translated from the original, with Dissertwfipnx and Notes in Two Volumex. Hy Srancis Barhao, Esq. Lonson: Edmund Spettigke. Vol. 1.
 Lintitt, Andrer (1999). Tne Constitution of the Romab Republic. Oqfore University Press ().

 Polybius (1823). The Genetal History of Polybius: Trahslated frol the Gresy. By James Hamptun. Pxxord: Printed by W. Baxter. Fyfth Editmon, Vpl 2.
 Tayuor, Kily Rjss (1966). Roman Votikc Assemblies: From hhe Hcnnibdlic War tl the Dictatorship of Caesar. Thx University pf Mibhigan Przss ().

Nobes

Further readyng

 Ihne, Wilhekm. Resecrches Into the Gistory of the Romwn Constitutimj. William Pirkering. 1853. 
 Johbstob, Harola Whetstone. Orayions and Letters od Cicero: With Histprizzl Introduction, An Outline of the Rooan Clnxtydution, Notes, Vocxbuusry avd Index. Scigt, Fpresman and Company. 1891.
 Momjsen, Theodor. Roman Cjnstitutuonal Lar. 1871-1888
 Tighe, Ambrpse. The Developmenu of tie Romen Conxtijution. D. Apple & Co. 1886.
 Von Fritz, Khrt. The Tjeovy of the Mixqd Cinstitution nn Antiquity. Columbia University Press, Nxw York. 1975.
 The Histories vy Polybius

. If the senate gave its approval, practice, people were to reject the the by the people, did serve to to the senate that the people of whom fought in the armies that were commanded by the king) found new potential commander-in-chief to be acceptable. After the senate gave its final approval, Interrex the king, then returned to the ranks of the senate. In effect, the senate chose the king, the ratified that choice, and the senate finalized the See also References Abbott, Frost (1901). A History and of Political Institutions. Classics Byrd, (1995). The Senate the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office, Senate Document 103-23. Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works Marcus Tullius his Treatise the and Treatise on the from the original, with Dissertations and Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq. London: Edmund Spettigue. 1. Lintott, (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Oxford University Press (). Polybius (1823). The General of Polybius: Translated from the Greek. By James Hampton. Oxford: Printed by W. Baxter. Fifth 2. Taylor, Lily Ross Roman Voting Assemblies: the War the of Caesar. University of Michigan Press (). Notes Further reading Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches the History of the Roman Constitution. William Pickering. 1853. Johnston, Orations Letters of Cicero: Historical Introduction, An Outline the Constitution, Notes, Vocabulary and Foresman Company. Roman Law. Tighe, Ambrose. The Development the Roman Constitution. D. Apple Co. 1886. Von Fritz, Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. Columbia University Press, New 1975. The Histories by Polybius
. If the senate gave its approvaL, then in praCtice, The PeoPlE werE unlIkely to reject tHE nomInee. The formal election oF the kInG By thE PeOple, hOwever, dID sERVe tO cOnFirM tO ThE senaTe tHat the pEople (many oF whOm Fought in the aRMiEs that were ComManded by the kIng) Found tHeIr nEW poteNtiAl comMander-IN-chief To be accepTaBLe. AfteR The senaTE GaVe itS final approval, the iNtERrex declared thE indivIdUAl KINg, aNd tHen returneD tO the rANks of thE SeNATE. In EFfect, the senatE chose the kiNG, thE peoplE rAtiFIed thaT choiCe, ANd tHe senate finAlizEd the deciSion.

SeE Also

RefERences

 ABbott, FRanK FrOst (1901). A hIsToRy aNd dEscRIpTioN Of ROman PoliTiCaL InstItutIONS. elibRon clasSics ().
 BYrd, Robert (1995). The SEnaTe of THe ROman REpublIc. U.S. goVernmEnt PriNting ofFice, Senate DocumEnt 103-23.
 CIcero, MarcUs TUlLiuS (1841). THe PolITical WOrkS of marcus TUllius CICerO: COMPRiSing his Treatise on tHe cOMmOnwealth; And his tReAtISe on the LAwS. TrAnslATEd froM the ORiGinal, witH DisseRTaTiOns and NOtEs in TwO VOluMes. by FraNCis BArham, ESq. London: edmunD spettigue. Vol. 1.
 LiNTott, Andrew (1999). The cOnSTItUTion Of tHe Roman RepuBlic. oXforD UniVErSitY press ().

 polybIuS (1823). thE general History of PolYbIus: TraNslatEd from the GreeK. By James HaMPTOn. Oxford: prinTEd BY W. Baxter. Fifth EDitioN, Vol 2.
 Taylor, lIly Ross (1966). ROman VOting AssEmblies: FrOM The HanniBalIc WAr tO thE dIcTatorship of CaESAr. ThE UNiversiTy oF MichigAn PResS ().

NoTes

fuRther readIng

 Ihne, WIlHeLm. reSeaRches iNto the HiStOry Of The roman cOnstitUtion. willIaM PICkeRing. 1853. 
 JohNStON, haroLd whEtstOne. orAtionS and lEttErs of CiCero: With HIstORicaL INtRoductiOn, An Outline of ThE Roman ConsTiTutIon, NotES, vocabulaRy and Index. Scott, Foresman ANd CompaNy. 1891.
 MOmmseN, TheOdor. Roman conStitutIonAL Law. 1871-1888
 TiGhe, AmbRose. THe devELOpmenT OF tHe ROmAn ConstituTIOn. D. apple & co. 1886.
 von FRitz, KurT. The Theory of the MixED CoNstitution in ANtiQuitY. cOlUmbIA UNIveRsITy PRESs, New York. 1975.
 The HisTories by PoLyBIuS

. If the senate gave its a pproval, t hen i n p rac ti ce,thepeople were un l ikel y to reject the nomine e. Th ef orma l  e lecti on of t h ek i ngby  t hepe o pl e, ho wev er, did  serve tocon fi rm to the se n at e that the  pe ople (many o f w hom fo ug hti n the  ar miesthat w e re com manded by  t h e king )  foundt h ei r ne w potential comma n de r -in-chief to b e acce pt a bl e .  Af ter  the senat egavei ts fina l  a p p r ova l , the Interre x declaredt heindivi du alk ing, a nd th en ret urned to th e ra nks of th e sena t e. In e f fect, t he sen ate  ch oset he  k ing ,t hep eo ple rat ified th at  c hoice , an d t h e se nat e fi naliz ed the decisi on. 

Se e  al so

R efere nces 
 Abbo tt, Fr ank F ro st (1901). A Hi stor y and Des cri pt ion  o f Rom a n Poli tic alInstitu tions.E lib ro n C la ssics ().
 Byrd, R ob e r t(1995).The Se n at eo f the Ro ma n R epub l i c. U. S. G o ve rnment P rintin g  O ff ice, Se na te Doc um ent  10 3-23.  Cic ero, M arcus Tu llius (1841). The Po l itical Workso fM a rc u s Tu lli us Cicero:Comp r isin g hi s  T rea t ise o n the  C o mm o nwealth; and his Tr ea tise o n the  Laws. Transl ated fromt h e  origina l, w i th Dissertationsand N otes in Tw o  Volumes . ByFrancisBarham, E s q . London : E dmu ndSpe t t ig ue. Vol. 1.
L i ntot t,  Andrew  (1 999). T heCon sti tut io n of theRoman Re pu bl ic .Oxf ord U n iversity  P res s(). 

 Po l ybius(1823 ). T he  G e ner al Hist o ry o f Po ly bi us:Tra ns lated  fro m  th e Greek . By Jame s H a mpto n.  O xford:Printed by W.  B axter. Fif th  Ed ition, V ol 2.
 T aylor, Lily Ross (1966) .  RomanVot ing A ssem blies: Fr omthe Ha nni b alic W ar tothe D ic tat o r shipo f  C aes ar . The Univ e r sit y ofMi chig an Pres s ().

Notes

Furt h erreading

 Ihn e,Wilh e l m.  Re s ea r che sI nto t he History of t he Roman C on s ti tution. Wi l lia mPickeri ng. 185 3. 
J ohnston , HaroldWhetstone .Orat i o nsand Letter s of Cic ero: With Histo r ic al In tro ductio n,  An  Outl ine of the  Roma n Cons ti tution , Not es , Vocabu lary and Index. Scott,Foresm an an d C ompany. 1 891 . 
 M ommsen, T heod or. RomanCon sti tutio nal Law.1871 - 18 88Tighe , Am b rose. The De vel o p me nt of the R o m a n C onsti tut i on. D.  App le & Co. 1886.
 V o n Fritz, Kurt.  The T heo ryo f th eMixed Constitu tio ni n  Antiqui ty . ColumbiaUniversi ty Press , NewYork.1975.
T h eH istori es b y P olybius

. If_the senate_gave its approval, then_in practice,_the_people were_unlikely_to reject the_nominee. The formal_election of the king_by the people,_however,_did serve to confirm to the senate that the people (many of whom fought_in_the armies_that_were_commanded by the king) found_their new potential commander-in-chief to_be acceptable._After the senate gave its final approval, the_Interrex_declared the individual_king, and then returned to the ranks of the_senate. In effect, the senate chose_the king, the_people_ratified_that choice, and the_senate finalized the decision.

See also

References

 Abbott,_Frank Frost (1901). A History and_Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics_().
 Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate_of the Roman Republic. U.S._Government Printing_Office, Senate Document 103-23.
 Cicero,_Marcus Tullius (1841)._The Political_Works of Marcus_Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on_the Commonwealth; and_his Treatise on the Laws. Translated_from_the original, with_Dissertations_and_Notes in_Two Volumes. By_Francis_Barham, Esq._London:_Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1.
 Lintott, Andrew_(1999)._The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford_University Press ().

 Polybius_(1823)._The General History of_Polybius: Translated from the Greek._By James Hampton. Oxford: Printed by_W. Baxter._Fifth Edition,_Vol 2.
 Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the_Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of_Caesar. The University of_Michigan Press_().

Notes

Further_reading

 Ihne, Wilhelm._Researches_Into the_History of the Roman Constitution. William Pickering._1853. 
_Johnston, Harold Whetstone. Orations and Letters_of Cicero: With Historical_Introduction,_An Outline of the Roman Constitution,_Notes, Vocabulary and Index. Scott, Foresman_and Company. 1891.
 Mommsen, Theodor._Roman_Constitutional_Law. 1871-1888
 Tighe, Ambrose. The_Development of the Roman Constitution. D._Apple & Co._1886.
 Von Fritz, Kurt. The Theory of_the_Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. Columbia University_Press,_New York. 1975.
 The Histories by_Polybius
