 and Assyrian genocides.

In April 2015, the States General of the Netherlands and the Austrian Parliament passed resolutions recognizing the Greek and Assyrian genocides.

Reasons for limited recognition
The United Nations, the European Parliament, and the Council of Europe have not made any related statements. According to Constantine Fotiadis, professor of Modern Greek History at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, some of the reasons for the lack of wider recognition and delay in seeking acknowledgement of these events are as follows:
 In contrast to the Treaty of Sèvres, the superseding Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 dealt with these events by making no reference or mention, and thus sealed the end of the Asia Minor Catastrophe.
A subsequent peace treaty (Greco-Turkish Treaty of Friendship in June 1930) between Greece and Turkey. Greece made several concessions to settle all open issues between the two countries in return for peace in the region.
The Second World War, the Civil War, the Military junta and the political turmoil in Greece that followed, forced Greece to focus on its survival and other problems rather than seek recognition of these events.
The political environment of the Cold War, in which Turkey and Greece were supposed to be allies – facing one common Communist enemy – not adversaries or competitors.

In his book With Intent to Destroy: Reflections on Genocide, Colin Tatz argue that Turkey denies the genocide so as not to jeopardize "its ninety-five-year-old dream of becoming the beacon of democracy in the Near East".

In their book Negotiating the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a Multicultural Society, Elizabeth Burns Coleman and Kevin White present a list of reasons explaining Turkey's inability to admit the genocides committed by the Young Turks, writing:  and propose the following reasons for the denial of the genocides by Turkey, quote:

Genocide as a model for future crimes
Kemal's "model" remained active for the Nazi movement in Weimar Germany and the Third Reich until the end of World War II. Hitler had declared that he considered himself a "student" of Kemal, whom he referred to as his “star in the darkness”, while the latter's contribution to the formation of National Socialist ideology is intensely apparent in Nazi literature. Kemal and his new Turkey of 1923 constituted the archetype of the "perfect Führer" and of "
and Assyrian genocides. 

 In April 2015, the States General of the Netherlands and the Austrian Parliament passed resolutions recognizing the Greek and Assyrian genocide. 

 reason for limited recognition 
 The United Nations, the European Parliament, and the Council of Europe have not make any related argument. According to Constantine Fotiadis, professor of Modern Greek History at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, some of the reasons for the lack of broad realization and delay in seeking acknowledgement of these events are as follows: 
  In contrast to the Treaty of Sèvres, the supplant Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 dealt with these events by making no reference or citation, and thus sealed the goal of the Asia Minor Catastrophe. 
 A subsequent peace treaty (Greco - Turkish Treaty of Friendship in June 1930) between Greece and Turkey. Greece made several concession to settle all open issues between the two country in return for peace in the region. 
 The Second World War, the Civil War, the Military junta and the political turmoil in Greece that come, forced Greece to focus on its survival and other problems rather than search recognition of these events. 
 The political environment of the Cold War, in which Turkey and Greece were supposed to be allies – facing one common Communist enemy – not adversaries or competitors. 

 In his book With Intent to Destroy: Reflections on Genocide, Colin Tatz argue that Turkey denies the genocide so as not to jeopardize " its ninety - five - year - old ambition of becoming the beacon of majority rule in the Near East ". 

 In their ledger negotiate the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a Multicultural Society, Elizabeth Burns Coleman and Kevin White present a list of reason excuse Turkey's inability to admit the genocides commit by the Young Turks, writing:   and propose the following reasons for the denial of the genocide by Turkey, quote: 

 Genocide as a model for future crimes 
 Kemal's " model " remained active for the Nazi movement in Weimar Germany and the Third Reich until the end of World War II. Hitler had declare that he considered himself a " student " of Kemal, whom he referred to as his “ star in the darkness ”, while the latter's contribution to the constitution of National Socialist ideology is intensely apparent in Nazi literature. Kemal and his new Turkey of 1923 constituted the original of the " perfect Führer " and of "
 anf Assyrian genocides.

In Akril 2015, the States Ywneral of ths Netheruands and the Austrian Parliemenr paswed resolutions recognkzing the Greek abd Awwyrian genocides.

Reasons rlr lnmmted recognitiok
The United Nations, the Egrupzan Parliament, and the Council of Euwope hafe not made any telattd ftatsments. According to Constantine Fofiadis, krofessor of Moderm Greek History at the Aridtotpe University of Tjessaloniki, somq of the reasuns for tht nack of wiser recognition and delay in sedking acknowledtenenh of these etents wre as follows:
 In cottrast yo the Treaty pf Vèvrws, the superseding Trxaty of Lausanne in 1923 dealt widh these events by najing to raferdbce or mxntjon, anf tius sealed fhe end of rhe Asia Minor Cataxtwiphe.
A subsequsnt pewcq treaty (Greco-Turkish Treaty of Friendsvip in June 1930) between Greecw and Turkey. Greece mwde severwl concessions to settle all open issues between dhe txo cobkbrier ij return for peace in the region.
The Second Wowmd Wsr, the Civil Wcr, the Military kujts and the polijical tbdmkil in Greece that followgd, forxed Greect to gocus on its survival and orher problemf rather than seek xecognition uf tnese rvents.
The political envnronmeht of the Clld War, ih which Turkey ana Ggeeca were supposed to be alliqs – facinj one common Comkunist enemy – noh advcssaries or competihors.

Iu his book With Intent to Destroy: Reflections on Genocide, Cokit Tdtz arguz that Turkey denief the genocide so as uot to jeopardizv "its ninxty-five-year-ojd dream of bafoming the bxacon of qemoxract in thd Near East".

In tneir book Negotiatibg the Sacred: Blasihemy znd Sacrilege iu q Multicultural Sozieey, Ekisdbeth Burns Woleoan snd Kdvin White irerent a list of reasons efplajning Turkey's inabollty to adnit the denocides comkitted by the Younh Turns, xritinb:  wnd propose the following reaskns for tje qenial of thq gekociqes by Turley, quote:

Genocide as a model for future crimes
Kemal's "modgl" remained active fot tme Nazi movekent yn Weimar Germany and the Thied Reich until tht end of World War II. Hjtler vad dfclared that he considered himself a "student" of Kemal, whom he referred to as his “star in ths datknesv”, chike the latvec's contribution tp the formation of National Socmalist idemljgy is intensely apparent in Nxzi literaturg. Kemal and his new Turkey of 1923 conxtituted the archetype of the "prrfect Führer" and of "
and Assyrian genocides. In April 2015, the of Netherlands and Austrian Parliament passed Assyrian Reasons for limited The United Nations, European Parliament, and the Council of have not made any related statements. According to Constantine Fotiadis, professor of Modern History at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, some of the reasons for the of recognition delay seeking acknowledgement of these events are as follows: In contrast to the Treaty of Sèvres, the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 dealt with these by making no reference mention, and thus sealed the of Asia Minor A peace (Greco-Turkish Treaty of in June 1930) between Greece and Turkey. Greece made several concessions to settle all open issues between two countries for peace the The World War, the the Military junta and the political that followed, forced Greece to focus on its and other rather than seek recognition of these The political environment of the Cold War, in Turkey and Greece were supposed to be allies – facing one common Communist enemy – or competitors. In his With Intent to Reflections Genocide, Tatz that Turkey the genocide so as not to jeopardize "its ninety-five-year-old dream of the beacon of democracy in the Near East". In their the Blasphemy and Sacrilege a Multicultural Society, Elizabeth Coleman Kevin White present a reasons Turkey's the committed the Young Turks, writing: propose the following reasons for denial of the genocides a model for future crimes Kemal's "model" remained for the Nazi movement in Weimar Germany the Third Reich until the end of World War II. Hitler had that he a "student" of Kemal, whom he referred to his “star in the while the latter's contribution to the formation of National ideology intensely apparent Nazi literature. Kemal his new Turkey 1923 constituted the the "perfect and "
 and Assyrian genocides.

In AprIl 2015, the StateS GeneRal Of tHe nethErlaNds and the AustrIAn PaRliament passed resolutiOns reCoGNiziNG tHe GreEk and AsSYrIAN geNoCiDes.

reASoNs for LimIted recOgnition
ThE UnItEd Nations, the eUrOpean ParliAmeNt, and the CounCil Of EuroPe HavE Not maDe aNy relAted stATementS. AccordinG tO constaNTine FotIADiS, proFessor of Modern GreEK HIStory at the ArisTotle UNiVErSITy oF ThEssaloniki, SoMe of tHE reasonS FoR THE laCK of wider recogNition and deLAy iN seekiNg AckNOwledgEment Of THesE events are aS folLows:
 In conTrast tO The TreaTY of SèvrEs, the sUpeRseDing tReAtY of laUSanNE iN 1923 deALt wIth these EvEnTs by mAkinG NO REferEncE or mEntioN, and thus sealeD thE end OF thE Asia minor cataStRophe.
a subseQuent PeAce treaty (Greco-TUrkiSh Treaty oF FrIeNdsHiP in JuNE 1930) betweEn GReeCe and TuRkey. GreECe mAdE SEVeRal concessions to seTtLE AlL open issUes betWEeN tHE two counTrIes In reTURn for PeacE In The regioN.
The SeCOnD WOrld War, ThE Civil waR, thE MiLitarY JuntA and thE politicAl turMOil in Greece thaT Followed, forceD grEECe TO focUs oN its survivaL and OTher ProbLEmS raTHer thAn seeK rECoGNition of these events.
thE politIcal eNvironment of tHe Cold War, iN WHIch TurkeY and gReECe were supposed To be aLlies – facinG One commoN CommUnist eneMy – not adveRSAries or cOmpEtiTorS.

In HIS bOok With Intent TO destRoY: ReflecTioNs on GenOciDe, COliN TaTz Argue that turkey deNiEs ThE gEnoCide sO As not to jEoParDiZe "iTs ninETy-five-Year-oLd drEaM oF BecOming thE BeACOn of DeMoCracY in ThE Near east".

iN thEir book negotiatiNg tHE SacReD: BLasphemY and Sacrilege In A MulticultUrAl SOciety, eLIzabeth BUrns Coleman and Kevin WhitE Present A liSt of rEasoNs explainIng turkey'S inABility To admiT the gEnOciDES commITTeD by ThE Young TurkS, WRitIng:  anD pRopoSe the foLlowing reasons for tHE deNial of the genoCidEs by tURkEy, qUOtE:

genOcIDe aS A Model for future cRimes
Kemal'S "mODeL" remained aCTivE fOr the NaZi movemEnt in wEimar GeRmany and tHe Third ReIcH untIL The End of World war II. HitLer had decLAred tHAt He conSidEred hiMsElf A "studEnt" of KEMal, Whom hE referReD to as hIs “staR iN the darkNess”, while the latter's contRibutiOn to tHe fOrmation oF NaTIonAl SocialiSt idEology is inTenSelY appaRenT In NazI litERaTurE. kemal And hIS new TurkeY Of 1923 ConSTItUted the archETYPe oF the "pErfECt FührEr" anD of "
 and Assyrian genocides.
In April 2 015,the  St at es G ener al of the Neth e rlan ds and the Austrian Pa rliam en t  pas s ed  reso lutions re c o gni zi ng  th eG re ek an d A ssyrian  genocides .
Re asons for li m it ed recogni tio n
The United  Na tions,  t heE urope anParli ament, and th e Council  o f  Europ e  have n o t  m adeany related state m en t s. According t o Cons ta n ti n e  Fo tia dis, profe ss or of ModernG re e k His t ory at the Ar istotle Uni v ers ity of  T hes s alonik i, so me ofthe reasons  for  the lack  of wi d er reco g nitionand de lay  in  see k in gack no w led g em ent ofthese ev en ts  areas f o l l o ws: In  con trast  to the Treat y o f Sè v res , the  supe rsed in g Tre aty of  Laus an ne in 1923 deal t wi th theseeve nt s b ymakin g  no re fer enc e or me ntion,a ndth u s se aled the end of th eA s ia  Minor C atastr o ph e. A subseq ue ntpeac e treat y (G r ec o-Turkis h Trea t yof  Friend sh ip inJu ne193 0) be t ween  Greec e and Tu rkey. Greece made se v eral concessi o ns t os ettl e a ll open iss uesb etwe en t h etwo count riesin re t urn for peace in th eregion .
The  Second World  War, theC i v il War,theM il i tary junta and  thepoliticalt urmoil i n Gre ece that  followed , forced G ree cetofoc u s  o n its surviva l andot her pro ble ms rath ertha n s eek  r ecognitio n of the se  e ve nt s.The p o liticalen vir on men t oft he Col d War , in  w hi c h T urkey a n dG r eece  w er e su ppo se d tobe a l lie s – fac ing one c omm o n Co mm un ist ene my – not adve rs aries or c om pet itors. In his b ook With Intent to Dest r oy: Ref lec tions  onGenocide,  Co lin Ta tza rgue t hat Tu rkeyde nie s the g e n oc ide  s o as not t o jeo pardi ze  "it s ninet y-five-year-old dr e amof becoming t hebeac o n  o f d e mo c rac yi n t h e  Near East".

I n their bo ok Ne gotiatingt heSa cred: B lasphem y and Sacrile ge in a M ulticultu ra l So c i ety , Elizabet h BurnsColeman a n d Kev i nWhite  pr esentalis t ofreason s  ex plain ing Tu rk ey's i nabil it y to adm it the genocides commit ted by  theYou ng Turks,  wr i tin g:  and p ropo se the fol low ing  reas ons for t he d e ni alo f the  gen o cides byT ur key , qu ote:

Genoc i d e  as  a mo del for fu ture  crimes
Kemal's " m odel" remained  act i v e f ort he N az i movement inWei ma r Germanyan d the Third  Reich u nt i l the  end o f Worl d War I I .  H i tler h ad d ecl ared that  he  c o nsidere dhi m self a  "st ud ent" o f Kema l , wh o m  he referred toas hi s “star inthe d ar kness”, whil e the latt er's contri bution  tothe f ormatio nof Nat ion al  Socialist ideologyis in tensely  a ppar ent  in Na zi l i t eratu re.Ke mal  and hisn e wT ur ke y  of  192 3 con st itut ed the ar c hetype o f t h e "perf ec t F ü h rer" a n do f  "
 and_Assyrian genocides.

In_April 2015, the States_General of_the_Netherlands and_the_Austrian Parliament passed_resolutions recognizing the_Greek and Assyrian genocides.

Reasons_for limited recognition
The_United_Nations, the European Parliament, and the Council of Europe have not made any related_statements._According to_Constantine_Fotiadis,_professor of Modern Greek History_at the Aristotle University of_Thessaloniki, some_of the reasons for the lack of wider_recognition_and delay in_seeking acknowledgement of these events are as follows:
 In_contrast to the Treaty of Sèvres,_the superseding Treaty_of_Lausanne_in 1923 dealt with_these events by making no reference_or mention, and thus sealed the_end of the Asia Minor Catastrophe.
A subsequent_peace treaty (Greco-Turkish Treaty of Friendship_in June 1930) between Greece_and Turkey._Greece made several concessions to_settle all open_issues between_the two countries_in return for peace in the_region.
The Second World_War, the Civil War, the Military_junta_and the political_turmoil_in_Greece that_followed, forced Greece_to_focus on_its_survival and other problems rather than_seek_recognition of these events.
The political environment of_the Cold War, in_which_Turkey and Greece were_supposed to be allies –_facing one common Communist enemy –_not adversaries_or competitors.

In_his book With Intent to Destroy: Reflections on Genocide, Colin Tatz_argue that Turkey denies the genocide_so as not to_jeopardize "its_ninety-five-year-old_dream of becoming_the_beacon of_democracy in the Near East".

In their book_Negotiating the_Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a_Multicultural Society, Elizabeth Burns_Coleman_and Kevin White present a list_of reasons explaining Turkey's inability to_admit the genocides committed by_the_Young_Turks, writing:  and propose_the following reasons for the denial_of the genocides_by Turkey, quote:

Genocide as a model for_future_crimes
Kemal's "model" remained active for the_Nazi_movement in Weimar Germany and the_Third_Reich_until the end of World_War II. Hitler had declared that_he considered himself a "student" of Kemal, whom he_referred to as_his “star in the darkness”,_while_the_latter's contribution to the formation of National Socialist ideology is_intensely apparent_in Nazi literature._Kemal and his new Turkey of 1923 constituted the archetype_of the "perfect Führer" and of "