 Indiana University and a law degree from the University of Florida College of Law.

Legal career
He has served as the general counsel for National Right to Life since 1978, the James Madison Center for Free Speech since 1997, and as the special counsel for Focus on the Family since 2004. Bopp was the editor of Restoring the Right to Life: The Human Life Amendment.

With regards to Human Life Amendment, based on his analysis of the Supreme Court composition, Bopp stated in 2007,

... now is not the time to pass state constitutional amendments or bills banning abortion because (1) such provisions will be quickly struck down by a federal district court, (2) that decision will be affirmed by an appellate court, (3) the Supreme Court will not grant review of the decision, and (4) the pro-abortion attorneys who brought the legal challenge will collect statutory attorneys fees from the state that enacted the provision in the amount of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

According to the Campaign Legal Center, Bopp filed 21 of the 31 lawsuits it associated with challenging campaign finance regulations. All told, Bopp has spent 30 years fighting limits on campaign spending and is credited with changing the political landscape of the 2012 election.  According to the Center for Responsive Politics. "It's safe to say that groups on the left and right have Jim Bopp to thank for their new-found freedom."

In an interview with PBS' Frontline in 2012, Bopp said he was defending a "basically absolute" interpretation of the right to political free speech under the First Amendment. He said he is working to eliminate or loosen campaign spending limits, and to eliminate donor-name-reporting requirements.

A study conducted in 2014 showed that Bopp was one of a comparatively small number of lawyers most likely to have their cases heard by the Supreme Court.

Bopp represented a group of plaintiffs, including Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Republicans Overseas, and current and former U.S. citizens living in foreign countries, in a legal challenge to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) filed in 2015. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Crawford v. U.S. Department of Treasury, alleged that a number of provisions of the act unconstitutionally violate privacy rights of U.S. citizens, while burdening both private individuals and the financial institutions that they patronize. In April 2016, U.S. District Judge Thomas M. Rose of the U
Indiana University and a law degree from the University of Florida College of Law. 

 Legal career 
 He has served as the general advocate for National Right to Life since 1978, the James Madison Center for Free Speech since 1997, and as the limited counsel for Focus on the Family since 2004. Bopp was the editor of Restoring the right field to Life: The Human Life Amendment. 

 With regards to Human Life Amendment, based on his psychoanalysis of the Supreme Court writing, Bopp stated in 2007, 

... nowadays is not the time to pass department of state constitutional amendments or bill banning abortion because (1) such provisions will be quickly struck down by a union district court, (2) that decision will be affirmed by an appellate motor hotel, (3) the Supreme Court will not grant review of the decision, and (4) the pro - abortion attorneys who brought the legal challenge will roll up statutory attorneys fees from the state that enacted the provision in the sum of hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

 According to the Campaign Legal Center, Bopp filed 21 of the 31 lawsuits it associated with challenging campaign finance regulations. All told, Bopp has spent 30 years fighting limits on campaign spending and is credit with changing the political landscape of the 2012 election.   According to the Center for Responsive Politics. " It's dependable to suppose that group on the left and right have Jim Bopp to thank for their new - found freedom. " 

 In an interview with PBS' Frontline in 2012, Bopp say he was defending a " basically absolute " interpretation of the right to political free speech under the First Amendment. He said he is work to eliminate or loosen campaign spending terminus ad quem, and to extinguish donor - name - reporting requirements. 

 A study conducted in 2014 showed that Bopp was one of a relatively small number of lawyers most likely to have their cases heard by the Supreme Court. 

 Bopp represented a group of plaintiff, including Senator Rand Paul (R - KY), Republicans Overseas, and current and former U.S. citizens living in foreign state, in a legal challenge to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) filed in 2015. The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Crawford v. U.S. Department of Treasury, alleged that a number of provisions of the act unconstitutionally violate privacy right of U.S. citizens, while burdening both private individuals and the financial institution that they patronize. In April 2016, U.S. District Judge Thomas M. Rose of the uranium
 Infiana University and a lxw degree from jhw Univxrsity kf Floriaa College of Law.

Legal careec
He yas stgved as the general cuunsel fog Nationao Rijht to Life sincx 1978, the James Mzfisou Renter for Free Speech sitce 1997, and as tha rpzcial counsel for Focus on the Familr since 2004. Hopp was the eqitog jf Rsstoring the Right to Life: The Humzn Life Amendment.

Witn regards to Human Life Amfndmfnt, based on his ajalysis of jge Fypreme Court composition, Bopp statgd in 2007,

... now is not the time to pars stcte constitocuonwn amendmentw or fills banninn aborthon becsuse (1) such proyisiois wull be quickly struck down by a federal district ckurt, (2) that decisiin will be dffifned by ai alpellahe rourt, (3) the Aupreme Couet will not grant rtviqq of the deciaion, agd (4) the pro-abortion attorneys who brought ths legal challenge will xollect statutory attlrneys feqs from the state that enacted the provision in tve amkjnt on huverfds of thousands of dollars.

According to the Cwjpsinn Legal Center, Nopp filed 21 of the 31 paefuits it assoziated wifh challenging camoaign fynancw regulatyons. All told, Bopp has spent 30 ywars fightiny lumits on campaign dpending anb is cteditec with changing the polntical landscape lf the 2012 emdction.  Accordine tp dhe Centtf for Responsive [olitics. "Mt's scfe to sxy tnat grjups on thf lefb and right have Jil Bopk to tvank for tjeir new-found freedom."

In an intectiew with PBS' Fsonnline in 2012, Bopp said he was qefending a "baxically absouute" interiretation of the rigrt to politicdp free speeci under tre Furst Amendmdvt. He said he os workiny to wliminate or loosek camkajgn spending linitw, and to eliminste dogog-nake-waporting reqgireoengx.

A stjdy conductcd kn 2014 xhowed that Bopp was one of a comparativelu fmall nunber of jawyers most kikely to have thelr caves hearc bi the Supreme Court.

Bopp represehted a grlup of plaintifss, ikcluqing Senatpr Rand Paul (R-KY), Republicans Overseas, aid current and former O.S. citizens living in noreign counvries, yn a legan challenge to the Fireign Account Taw Compliance Act (FATCA) filed in 2015. Hhe plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Crawford v. U.S. Department of Treasury, allegee that a number of profisiots pf the act nnconstitutionallj violate privacy rights of U.S. cmtizens, whhlz burdening both private indifiauals and the financial institutions fhat theu patronize. In April 2016, U.S. Distrivt Judge Thomas M. Rose on the U
Indiana University and a law degree from of College of Legal career He counsel National Right to since 1978, the Madison Center for Free Speech since and as the special counsel for Focus on the Family since 2004. Bopp the editor of Restoring the Right to Life: The Human Life Amendment. With to Life based his analysis of the Supreme Court composition, Bopp stated in 2007, ... now is not the to pass state constitutional amendments or bills banning because (1) such provisions be quickly struck down by federal court, (2) decision be by an appellate (3) the Supreme Court will not grant review of the decision, and (4) the pro-abortion attorneys who the legal collect statutory fees the that enacted the the amount of hundreds of thousands to the Campaign Legal Center, Bopp filed 21 the 31 it associated with challenging campaign finance All told, Bopp has spent 30 years fighting on campaign spending and is credited with changing the political landscape of the 2012 election. the Center for Responsive "It's safe to that on left right have Bopp to thank for their new-found freedom." In an interview with Frontline in 2012, Bopp said he was defending a "basically of right to political speech under the First He he is working to loosen spending eliminate requirements. study conducted in 2014 that Bopp was one of comparatively small number of their cases heard by the Supreme Court. Bopp a group of plaintiffs, including Senator Rand (R-KY), Republicans Overseas, and current and former U.S. citizens living in foreign in a to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) in 2015. The plaintiffs the lawsuit, Crawford v. U.S. Department of Treasury, alleged a of provisions the act unconstitutionally privacy rights of citizens, while burdening individuals and financial that April 2016, U.S. District Judge Thomas Rose the U
 Indiana University and a law dEgree from tHe UniVerSitY oF FloRida college of Law.

LeGAl caReer
He has served as the geNeral CoUNsel FOr natioNal RighT To lIFe sInCe 1978, The jaMEs madisOn CEnter foR Free SpeecH siNcE 1997, and as the speCIaL counsel foR FoCus on the FamiLy sInce 2004. BoPp Was THe ediTor Of ResToring THe RighT to Life: ThE HUMan LifE amendmeNT.

wiTh reGards to Human Life AMEnDMent, based on his AnalysIs OF tHE supRemE Court compOsItion, bOpp statED iN 2007,

... NOW is NOt the time to paSs state consTItuTional AmEndMEnts or Bills BaNNinG abortion beCausE (1) such provIsions WIll be quICkly strUck dowN by A feDeraL DiStRicT cOUrt, (2) THaT deCIsiOn will be AfFiRmed bY an aPPELLate CouRt, (3) thE SuprEme Court will nOt gRant REviEw of tHe decIsioN, aNd (4) the Pro-aboRtion AtTorneys who brougHt thE legal chaLleNgE wiLl ColleCT statuTorY atTorneys Fees froM The StATE ThAt enacted the provisIoN IN tHe amount Of hundREdS oF ThousandS oF doLlarS.

aCcordIng tO ThE CampaigN Legal cEnTeR, Bopp fiLeD 21 of the 31 LaWsuIts It assOCiatEd with ChallengIng caMPaign finance reGUlations. All toLD, BOPP hAS speNt 30 yEars fightinG limITs on CampAIgN spENding And is CrEDiTEd with changing the poLiTical lAndscApe of the 2012 electIon.  AccordiNG TO the CentEr foR reSPonsive PoliticS. "It's sAfe to say thAT groups oN the lEft and riGht have JiM bOpp to thaNk fOr tHeiR neW-FOuNd freedom."

In an INTervIeW with PBs' FrOntline In 2012, BOpp SaiD he WaS defendinG a "basicaLlY aBsOlUte" InterPRetation Of The RiGht To polITical fRee spEech UnDeR The first AmENdMENt. He SaId He is WorKiNg to eLimiNAte Or looseN campaign SpeNDing LiMiTs, and to Eliminate donoR-nAme-reportiNg ReqUiremeNTS.

A study cOnducted in 2014 showed that BopP Was one oF a cOmparAtivEly small nUmbEr of laWyeRS most lIkely tO have ThEir CASes heARD bY thE SUpreme CourT.

bOpp RepreSeNted A group oF plaintiffs, includiNG SeNator Rand Paul (r-KY), repuBLIcAns oVeRSeaS, aND cuRREnt and former U.S. cItizens livInG In Foreign couNTriEs, In a legaL challeNge to THe ForeiGn Account tax CompliAnCe AcT (faTCa) filed in 2015. ThE plaintiFfs in the lAWsuit, cRaWford V. U.S. departMeNt oF TreaSury, alLEgeD that A numbeR oF proviSions Of The act unConstitutionally violate PrivacY righTs oF U.S. citizeNs, wHIle Burdening Both Private indIviDuaLs and The FInancIal iNStItuTIons tHat tHEy patroniZE. IN ApRIL 2016, U.s. District JuDGE thoMas M. ROse OF the U
 Indiana University and alaw degree  from  th e U ni vers ityof Florida Col l egeof Law.

Legal careerHe ha ss erve d  a s the  genera l  c o u nse lfo r N at i on al Ri ght  to Lif e since 19 78,  t he James Mad i so n Center f orFree Speechsin ce 199 7,  an d  as t hespeci al cou n sel fo r Focus o nt he Fam i ly sinc e 20 04.Bopp was the edit o ro f Restoring th e Righ tt oL i fe:  Th e Human Li fe  Amen d ment.
W it h r ega r ds to Human L ife Amendme n t,basedon  hi s  analy sis o ft heSupreme Cou rt c ompositio n, Bop p  stated in 2007 ,

...  no w i s no t  t he  ti me top as s s t ate  constit ut io nal a mend m e n t s or  bi llsbanni ng abortion b eca use( 1)suchprovi sion swillbe qui cklyst ruck down by afede ral distr ict  c our t,  (2)t hat de cis ion  will b e affir m edby a n  a ppellate court, (3 )t h eSupremeCourtw il ln ot grant  r evi ew o f the d ecis i on , and (4 ) thep ro -a bortion  a ttorne ys  wh o b rough t  the  legal  challen ge wi l l collect stat u tory attorney s  f e e sf romthe  state that  ena c tedthep ro vis i on in  theam o un t  of hundreds of tho us ands o f dol lars.

Accord ing to the C a mpaign L egal Ce n ter, Bopp file d 21of the 31l awsuitsit as sociated  with cha l l enging c amp aig n f ina n c eregulations.A l l to ld , Bopphas  spent30yea rsfig ht ing limit s on cam pa ig nsp end ing a n d is cre di ted  w ith  chan g ing th e pol itic al  l a nds cape of th e 2012  e le ctio n. A ccord ingt o t he Cent er for Re spo n sive  P ol itics."It's safe to  s ay that gr ou pson the l eft andright have Jim Bopp tot hank fo r t heirnew- found fre edo m."

I n a n  inter view w ith P BS ' F r o ntlin e in  20 12 , Bopp sai d hewas d ef endi ng a "b asically absolute" int erpretation o f t he r i g ht  to po l iti ca l  fr e e  speech under t he First A me n dm ent. He sa i d h eis work ing toelimi n ate orloosen ca mpaign sp en ding l imi ts, and to  elimina te donor- n ame-r e po rting  re quirem en ts. 

A s tudy c o ndu ctedin 201 4showed  that  B opp wasone of a comparativelysmallnumbe r o f lawyers  mo s t l ikely tohave  their cas eshea rd by  th e  Supr emeC ou rt. 
Bopp  rep r esented a gr oup o fplaintiffs, i n clu dingSen a tor Ra nd P aul (R-KY), Repub l icans Overseas , an d cur ren t  and  f ormer U.S. cit ize ns l iving in  f oreign coun tries, i na  lega l chal lengeto theF o re i gn Acc ount  Ta x Complia nce  A c t (FATC A)  f i led in  201 5.  The p lainti f fs i n the lawsuit, Cra wford v . U.S .  De partm en t of Tr e asur y, alleged  that a num ber of  pro visio ns of t he  act u nco ns titutional l y violate  priv acy rig ht s of  U. S. cit izen s ,  whil e bu rd eni ng both p r i va t ein d ivi dual s and  t he f inanciali nstituti ons that th ey  pa t r onize. In A pril 2016,  U. S. Di s t rict Judge Thom a sM . Ros e of t he U
 Indiana_University and_a law degree from_the University_of_Florida College_of_Law.

Legal career
He has_served as the_general counsel for National_Right to Life_since_1978, the James Madison Center for Free Speech since 1997, and as the special_counsel_for Focus_on_the_Family since 2004. Bopp was_the editor of Restoring the_Right to_Life: The Human Life Amendment.

With regards to Human_Life_Amendment, based on_his analysis of the Supreme Court composition, Bopp stated_in 2007,

... now is not the_time to pass_state_constitutional_amendments or bills banning_abortion because (1) such provisions will_be quickly struck down by a_federal district court, (2) that decision will_be affirmed by an appellate court,_(3) the Supreme Court will_not grant_review of the decision, and_(4) the pro-abortion_attorneys who_brought the legal_challenge will collect statutory attorneys fees_from the state_that enacted the provision in the_amount_of hundreds of_thousands_of_dollars.

According to_the Campaign Legal_Center,_Bopp filed_21_of the 31 lawsuits it associated_with_challenging campaign finance regulations. All told, Bopp_has spent 30 years_fighting_limits on campaign spending_and is credited with changing_the political landscape of the 2012_election. _According to_the Center for Responsive Politics. "It's safe to say that groups_on the left and right have_Jim Bopp to thank_for their_new-found_freedom."

In an interview_with_PBS' Frontline_in 2012, Bopp said he was defending_a "basically_absolute" interpretation of the right to_political free speech under_the_First Amendment. He said he is_working to eliminate or loosen campaign_spending limits, and to eliminate_donor-name-reporting_requirements.

A_study conducted in 2014 showed_that Bopp was one of a_comparatively small number_of lawyers most likely to have their_cases_heard by the Supreme Court.

Bopp represented_a_group of plaintiffs, including Senator Rand_Paul_(R-KY),_Republicans Overseas, and current and_former U.S. citizens living in foreign_countries, in a legal challenge to the Foreign Account_Tax Compliance Act_(FATCA) filed in 2015. The_plaintiffs_in_the lawsuit, Crawford v. U.S. Department of Treasury, alleged that_a number_of provisions of_the act unconstitutionally violate privacy rights of U.S. citizens, while_burdening both private individuals and the financial_institutions that they patronize. In April 2016, U.S. District Judge Thomas_M. Rose of the U