.

In 2011, i2 received $10 million as an out of court settlement from Palantir. i2 sued Palantir in federal court alleging fraud, conspiracy, and copyright infringement over Palantir's algorithm. Shyam Sankar, Palantir’s director of business development, used a private eye company as the cutout for obtaining i2's code.

Products
The first products included the i2 Link Notebook and i2 Case Notebook.

The i2 Link Notebook enabled investigators to create entity relationship diagrams (a kind of visual database) allowing raw intelligence – largely textual reports (e.g. witness statements) – to be entered manually, revealing the relationships within the data and enabling data from different sources to be collated and graded. Automatic and manual layouts, and the ability to create, share, search, analyse and crucially print, even extremely large charts (sometimes tens of metres in length), dramatically improved law enforcement's ability to understand and communicate the status of investigations, and to direct and manage the process.

The i2 Case Notebook provided similar data entry and visualisation of time series data (i.e. laying events out along themes such as people and places), again able to handle very large data sets. Even with variable density timescales, due to the very large number of events uncovered in a large investigation, a single Case Chart could cover several walls in an office, or stretch tens of metres along a corridor.

While initially for manual data entry, these tools were then extended with add-on components to allow integration with databases. These database add-ons allowed mapping between a database entities (such as person, place, organisation, vehicle, asset, event) and the relationships between entities (such as associate, owns, related) and visual entities used to represent those records on the chart (person icon, place icon etc.). The first such database interface was to HOLMES 2 (Home Office Large Major Enquiry System), and subsequently many different SQL and even free text data sources. With database integration a query could be entered from within the visual representation of the data, the chart, either using a context menu on the chart background, or on a displayed entity (usually an icon). Query results were delivered directly to the visualisation, by adding elements to the chart, and any added entities and links were automatically laid out without disturbing the rest of the chart, for ease of understanding.  Investigators could explore a database with
. 

 In 2011, i2 received $ 10 million as an out of court settlement from Palantir. i2 sued Palantir in union motor hotel allege fraud, conspiracy, and copyright infringement over Palantir's algorithm. Shyam Sankar, Palantir ’s director of occupation development, used a secret center company as the cutout for obtaining i2's code. 

 Products 
 The first products admit the i2 Link Notebook and i2 Case Notebook. 

 The i2 Link Notebook enabled investigators to produce entity kinship diagrams (a kind of visual database) allow raw intelligence – largely textual report (e.g. witness statements) – to be figure manually, revealing the relationships within the data and enabling datum from different source to be collated and graded. Automatic and manual layouts, and the ability to make, share, search, analyse and crucially print, even extremely large charts (sometimes tens of metres in length), dramatically improved law enforcement's ability to understand and communicate the status of investigations, and to direct and manage the process. 

 The i2 Case Notebook supply similar data entrance and visual image of prison term series data (i.e. lay event out along themes such as people and home), again able to handle very large data sets. Even with variable density timescales, due to the very big number of events uncovered in a large probe, a single character Chart could brood several walls in an office, or stretch ten of metres along a corridor. 

 While initially for manual data entry, these creature were then extended with add - on components to allow consolidation with databases. These database add - ons allowed mapping between a database entities (such as person, topographic point, organisation, fomite, asset, event) and the relationships between entities (such as associate, own, related) and visual entities used to defend those records on the chart (person picture, place icon etc .). The first such database interface was to HOLMES 2 (Home Office big Major Enquiry System), and subsequently many different SQL and even free text data sources. With database consolidation a query could be entered from within the ocular representation of the data, the chart, either using a context menu on the chart background, or on a displayed entity (usually an icon). Query resultant role were delivered directly to the visualisation, by adding elements to the chart, and any added entity and links were automatically lay out without disturbing the rest of the chart, for ease of understanding.   Investigators could explore a database with
.

In 2011, i2 received $10 million as xn out of court settlekent fdom Palavtir. i2 sued Palantir in fedecal xourt alleging fraud, conspifacy, and bopyright infcingement over Pemantir's algorjbhm. Skyem Sankar, Palanjir’s directos of business gexepopment, used a private eye company ws the vuhout for obtaiging y2's ckde.

Products
The first products inclhded tht i2 Link Notebook snd i2 Case Notebook.

The i2 Llnk Jotebook enabled ijvestigatorw to xreate entith relationship diagrama (a kind of visual database) alluwing raw inteloitenfg – largely txxtual reports (e.g. witness vtatememts) – to be entcred kanyally, revealing the rxlationships within jhe data atd enabling data frim diffgrent soufxes to bx ckllatef aid graded. Ahtomatic ane manual layouts, anc eye ability to creatq, fhare, search, analyse and crucially prinu, eveh extremely large chartw (sometimes tens of mgtres in lqngth), dramatically improved law enforcement's abilhty tk unbcvstave wnd communicate the status of investigations, whd tp direct and mcnage the procesx.

Tje y2 Case Notebouk prorjdsd similar data enhry and visuqlisation of yime series data (i.e. laying wvents out ajing themes such as people and plaves), abain able to handle verv largs data sets. Even witg variable densith tpmeswales, dut to the very largq number if erents unzoveted in w large ingestindtion, a single Casf Chatt cound cover sfveral walls in an office, or stcxtch tens of kedrev along c corrldor.

While initiwlly for manuak data zntry, ghese toola were vhen extendeq with add-on wlmponents to allow igtegeatiin with aatabases. Thesr databasv cdd-ons aloowed mapping betwcen a satabase entitizr (such as person, plxce, oggaiisatymn, vehicle, avset, evdmt) ana the rtjabiovshils between entities (vuch as associate, owns, rclated) ane visual entities usec to represent thode rerords un thr crart (person icon, place icon etd.). The firdt fuch databasq inberfwce was to HOLMES 2 (Home Office Large Major Enquirb System), and subsequenjly many different SQK and even fcee tevt data smurces. With database integration a qutry could be entered frkm witvin tje visual representation of the data, the chart, either using a context meny on tie chart backfroumd, or ou a displwyed xntity (usually an icon). Query results were deliveced directny to the visualisation, by addone elements to the chart, and any added entitiex and links were automatically kaid out without disturblng the rwst or the bgact, for ease of underxtandiug.  Incestigarors could explord a dwtabase wlth
. In 2011, i2 received $10 million out court settlement Palantir. i2 sued fraud, and copyright infringement Palantir's algorithm. Shyam Palantir’s director of business development, used private eye company as the cutout for obtaining i2's code. Products The first included the i2 Link Notebook and i2 Case Notebook. The i2 Link Notebook investigators create relationship (a kind of visual database) allowing raw intelligence – largely textual reports (e.g. witness statements) – be entered manually, revealing the relationships within the and enabling data from sources to be collated and Automatic manual layouts, the to share, search, analyse crucially print, even extremely large charts (sometimes tens of metres in length), dramatically improved law enforcement's ability understand and status of and direct manage the process. Case Notebook provided similar data entry time series data (i.e. laying events out along such as and places), again able to handle large data sets. Even with variable density timescales, to the very large number of events uncovered in a large investigation, a single Case cover several walls in office, or stretch of along corridor. initially for data entry, these tools were then extended with add-on components to integration with databases. These database add-ons allowed mapping between a (such person, place, organisation, asset, event) and the between (such as associate, owns, visual used records the (person icon, place icon The first such database interface to HOLMES 2 (Home and subsequently many different SQL and even free data sources. With database integration a query be entered from within the visual representation of the data, the chart, using a on the chart background, or on a displayed (usually an icon). Query were delivered directly to the visualisation, by adding elements the and any entities and links automatically laid out disturbing the rest chart, for of Investigators database with
.

In 2011, i2 received $10 million as an out Of court setTlemeNt fRom paLantIr. i2 sUed Palantir in fEDeraL court alleging fraud, conSpiraCy, ANd coPYrIght iNfringeMEnT OVer paLaNtiR's ALgOrithM. ShYam SankAr, Palantir’S diReCtor of busineSS dEvelopment, UseD a private eye ComPany as ThE cuTOut foR obTainiNg i2's coDE.

ProduCts
The firSt PRoductS IncludeD THe I2 LinK Notebook and i2 Case nOtEBook.

The i2 Link NoTebook EnABlED InvEstIgators to cReAte enTIty relaTIoNSHIp dIAgrams (a kind of Visual databASe) aLlowinG rAw iNTelligEnce – lArGEly Textual repoRts (e.G. witness sTatemeNTs) – to be eNTered maNually, RevEalIng tHE rElAtiOnSHipS WiThiN The Data and eNaBlIng daTa frOM DIFferEnt SourCes to Be collated and GraDed. AUTomAtic aNd manUal lAyOuts, aNd the aBilitY tO create, share, seaRch, aNalyse and CruCiAllY pRint, eVEn extrEmeLy lArge chaRts (someTImeS tENS Of Metres in length), dramAtICAlLy improvEd law eNFoRcEMent's abiLiTy tO undERStand And cOMmUnicate tHe statUS oF iNvestigAtIons, anD tO diRecT and mANage The proCess.

The i2 case NOTebook provided SImilar data entRY aND ViSUaliSatIon of time seRies DAta (i.E. layINg EveNTs out Along ThEMeS Such as people and placEs), Again aBle to Handle very larGe data sets. eVEN with varIablE DeNSity timescales, Due to The very larGE number oF evenTs uncoveRed in a larGE InvestigAtiOn, a SinGle cASe chart could covER SeveRaL walls iN an Office, oR stRetCh tEns Of Metres aloNg a corriDoR.

WHiLe IniTiallY For manuaL dAta EnTry, These TOols weRe theN extEnDeD WitH add-on cOMpONEnts To AlLow iNteGrAtion With DAtaBases. ThEse databaSe aDD-ons AlLoWed mappIng between a daTaBase entitiEs (SucH as perSON, place, orGanisation, vehicle, asset, eVEnt) and tHe rElatiOnshIps betweeN enTities (SucH As assoCiate, oWns, reLaTed) AND visuAL EnTitIeS used to repRESenT thosE rEcorDs on the Chart (person icon, plaCE icOn etc.). The first SucH datABAsE inTErFAce WaS To HolmES 2 (Home Office LaRge Major EnQuIRy system), and sUBseQuEntly maNy diffeRent Sql and eveN free text Data sourcEs. with DATabAse integraTion a queRy could be ENtereD FrOm witHin The visUaL rePreseNtatioN Of tHe datA, the chArT, eitheR usinG a Context mEnu on the chart background, Or on a dIsplaYed Entity (usuAllY An iCon). Query rEsulTs were deliVerEd dIrectLy tO The viSualISaTioN, By addIng eLEments to tHE cHarT, ANd Any added entITIEs aNd linKs wERe autoMatiCally laid out withoUT disturbing the Rest OF The ChaRT, for EaSe of understandIng.  inVEStigatorS cOuld explore A databasE wITh
.

In 2011, i2 received $1 0 millionas an  ou t o fcour t se ttlement fromP alan tir. i2 sued Palantirin fe de r al c o ur t all eging f r au d ,  co ns pi rac y, an d cop yri ght inf ringementove rPalantir's a l go rithm. Shy amSankar, Pala nti r’s di re cto r  of b usi nessdevelo p ment,used a pr iv a te eye company a sthecutout for obtain i ng i2's code.

Pr oducts 
T h ef i rst  pr oducts inc lu ded t h e i2 Li n kN o t ebo o k and i2 Case  Notebook.The  i2 Li nk  No t ebookenabl ed inv estigatorsto c reate ent ity re l ationsh i p diagr ams (a  ki ndof v i su al  da ta b ase )  a llo w ing  raw int el li gence  – l a r g e ly t ext ualrepor ts (e.g. witn ess  sta t eme nts)– tobe e nt eredmanual ly, r ev ealing the rela tion ships wit hin  t heda ta an d  enabl ing  da ta from  differ e ntso u r c es  to be collated an dg r ad ed. Auto matica nd  m a nual lay ou ts,  and t he ab ilit y  t o create , shar e ,se arch, a na lyse a nd  cr uci allyp rint , even  extreme ly la r ge charts (som e times tens of me t r es in l eng th), dramat ical l y im prov e dlaw enfor cemen t' s  a b ility to understand  a nd com munic ate the statu s of inves t i g ations,andt od irect and mana ge th e process. 
The i2CaseNotebook  provided s imilar d ata  en try  an d vi sualisation o f time  s eries d ata  (i.e.lay ing  ev ent sout along  themessu ch  a speo ple a n d places ),  ag ai n a ble t o  handl e ver y la rg ed ata  sets.E ve n with  v ar iabl e d en sitytime s cal es, due  to the v ery larg enu mber of  events uncov er ed in a la rg e i nvesti g a tion, asingle Case Chart could cover s eve ral w alls  in an of fic e, orstr e tch te ns ofmetre salo n g  a co r r id or. 
While init i a lly  forma nual  data e ntry, these toolsw ere  then extende d w itha d d- onc om p one nt s  to a llow integratio n with dat ab a se s. These d a tab as e add-o ns allo wed m a pping b etween adatabaseen titi e s  (s uch as per son, pla ce, organ i satio n ,vehic le,  asset ,eve nt) a nd the rel ation shipsbe tweenentit ie s (suchas associate, owns, rel ated)and v isu al entiti esu sed  to repre sent  those rec ord s o n the  ch a rt (p erso n  i con ,  plac e ic o n etc.).T he  fi r s tsuch databa s e int erfac e w a s to H OLME S 2 (Home OfficeL arge Major Enq uiry S yst em) ,  and  s ubsequently ma nydi f f erent SQ Land even fr ee textda t a sou rces.With d atabase i nt e gratio n aque ry couldbeen t ered fr om  w i thin t he v is ual re presen t atio n of the data, the  char t ,  eith e r u singacontext menu  on the ch art backgro und, o r on  a di splayed  e ntity(us ua lly an ico n ). Queryresul ts were  d eliv ere d dire ctly t o the  vis ua lis ation, by a dd i ng  e l eme ntsto th echar t, and an y  added e nti t ies and  l ink s were a u to m a tically la idout w i t hout distu r bing th e  rest  of th e char t, fore ase  o f under sta n d ing.  Inv estigator s  co ul d ex plore ada taba se  wi th 
.

In 2011,_i2 received_$10 million as an_out of_court_settlement from_Palantir._i2 sued Palantir_in federal court_alleging fraud, conspiracy, and_copyright infringement over_Palantir's_algorithm. Shyam Sankar, Palantir’s director of business development, used a private eye company as_the_cutout for_obtaining_i2's_code.

Products
The first products included the_i2 Link Notebook and i2_Case Notebook.

The_i2 Link Notebook enabled investigators to create entity_relationship_diagrams (a kind_of visual database) allowing raw intelligence – largely textual_reports (e.g. witness statements) – to_be entered manually,_revealing_the_relationships within the data_and enabling data from different sources_to be collated and graded. Automatic_and manual layouts, and the ability to_create, share, search, analyse and crucially_print, even extremely large charts_(sometimes tens_of metres in length), dramatically_improved law enforcement's_ability to_understand and communicate_the status of investigations, and to_direct and manage_the process.

The i2 Case Notebook provided_similar_data entry and_visualisation_of_time series_data (i.e. laying_events_out along_themes_such as people and places), again_able_to handle very large data sets. Even_with variable density timescales,_due_to the very large_number of events uncovered in_a large investigation, a single Case_Chart could_cover several_walls in an office, or stretch tens of metres along a_corridor.

While initially for manual data entry,_these tools were then_extended with_add-on_components to allow_integration_with databases._These database add-ons allowed mapping between a_database entities_(such as person, place, organisation, vehicle,_asset, event) and the_relationships_between entities (such as associate, owns,_related) and visual entities used to_represent those records on the_chart_(person_icon, place icon etc.). The_first such database interface was to_HOLMES 2 (Home_Office Large Major Enquiry System), and subsequently_many_different SQL and even free text_data_sources. With database integration a query_could_be_entered from within the visual_representation of the data, the chart,_either using a context menu on the chart background,_or on a_displayed entity (usually an icon)._Query_results_were delivered directly to the visualisation, by adding elements to_the chart,_and any added_entities and links were automatically laid out without disturbing the_rest of the chart, for ease of_understanding.  Investigators could explore a database with