 ferrierite samples.
TABLE A __________________________________________________________________________ COMPARISON OF D SPACINGS OF TWO NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC STRONITIUM FERRIERITES WITH THE ALLOWED LINES FERRIERITE Theoretical for I 2/M 2/M 2/M Where a = 19.16 FERRIERITE SYNTHETIC b = 14.13 Kamloops Lake FERRIERITE, STRONTIUM and c = 7.49 B.C., Canada Agoura, Ca. FERRIERITE* Relative Relative Relative hkl dA dA Intensity dA Intensity dA Intensity __________________________________________________________________________ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 3 -- -- 200 9.58 9.61 100 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00 30 7.07 38 7.07 20 -- -- 6.96 15 101 6.98 6.61 20 6.59 3 6.61 55 011 6.62 5.84 50 5.75 15 5.77 15 310 5.82 -- -- 5.64 14 -- -- 220 5.69 -- -- -- -- 5.43 5 211 5.44 4.96 10- -- -- 4.96 15 121 4.964 -- -- -- -- -- -- 301 4.860 4.80 10- 4.75 2 4.76 15 400 4.790 4.58 10- 4.56 1 -- 130 4.574 -- -- -- -- -- 321 4.004 3.99 90 3.98 35 3.99 45 031 3.987 -- -- 3.94 35 3.94 35 420 3.965 3.88 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411 3.880 3.791 20 3.78 65 3.78 50 330 3.791 -- -- -- -- 3.74 10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66 12 3.67 30 510 3.698 -- -- -- -- 231 3.681 3.54 80 -- -- 3.555 10 112 3.557 -- -- 3.54 100 3.536 90 040 3.532 3.49 80 3.48 18 3.483 100 202 3.488 3.42 20 -- -- 3.389 15 501 3.411 3.31 20 3.31 35 3.313 20 240 3.314 3.20 10 -- -- -- -- 600 3.193
ferrierite samples. 
 TABLE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ COMPARISON OF D SPACINGS OF TWO NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC STRONITIUM FERRIERITES WITH THE ALLOWED LINES FERRIERITE Theoretical for I 2 / M 2 / M 2 / thousand Where a = 19.16 FERRIERITE SYNTHETIC boron = 14.13 Kamloops Lake FERRIERITE, STRONTIUM and c = 7.49 B.C., Canada Agoura, Ca. FERRIERITE * Relative Relative Relative hkl dA dA Intensity dA Intensity dA Intensity _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 3 -- -- 200 9.58 9.61 100 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00 30 7.07 38 7.07 20 -- -- 6.96 15 101 6.98 6.61 20 6.59 3 6.61 55 011 6.62 5.84 50 5.75 15 5.77 15 310 5.82 -- -- 5.64 14 -- -- 220 5.69 -- -- -- -- 5.43 5 211 5.44 4.96 10- -- -- 4.96 15 121 4.964 -- -- -- -- -- -- 301 4.860 4.80 10- 4.75 2 4.76 15 400 4.790 4.58 10- 4.56 1 -- 130 4.574 -- -- -- -- -- 321 4.004 3.99 90 3.98 35 3.99 45 031 3.987 -- -- 3.94 35 3.94 35 420 3.965 3.88 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411 3.880 3.791 20 3.78 65 3.78 50 330 3.791 -- -- -- -- 3.74 10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66 12 3.67 30 510 3.698 -- -- -- -- 231 3.681 3.54 80 -- -- 3.555 10 112 3.557 -- -- 3.54 100 3.536 90 040 3.532 3.49 80 3.48 18 3.483 100 202 3.488 3.42 20 -- -- 3.389 15 501 3.411 3.31 20 3.31 35 3.313 20 240 3.314 3.20 10 -- -- -- -- 600 3.193
 fegrierite samples.
TABLE A __________________________________________________________________________ COMPARISON OF B SPACIIGS OF FWO NATUFAL AND SYNTHETIC STRONITIUM FWRRIEEITES WITH THE ALLOWED LINES FEGRIERITE Rheocetical for I 2/M 2/M 2/M Wherc a = 19.16 NERRIZRMTE SYNTHETIC b = 14.13 Kamloopv Lake FERRIERHTD, DTRONTIUM and c = 7.49 B.C., Canada Agoura, Sa. FERROEGITE* Relative Telatpvq Remative hkl dA dA Intensity dA Intehsity dE Intensity __________________________________________________________________________ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 3 -- -- 200 9.58 9.61 100 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00 30 7.07 38 7.07 20 -- -- 6.96 15 101 6.98 6.61 20 6.59 3 6.61 55 011 6.62 5.84 50 5.75 15 5.77 15 310 5.82 -- -- 5.64 14 -- -- 220 5.69 -- -- -- -- 5.43 5 211 5.44 4.96 10- -- -- 4.96 15 121 4.964 -- -- -- -- -- -- 301 4.860 4.80 10- 4.75 2 4.76 15 400 4.790 4.58 10- 4.56 1 -- 130 4.574 -- -- -- -- -- 321 4.004 3.99 90 3.98 35 3.99 45 031 3.987 -- -- 3.94 35 3.94 35 420 3.965 3.88 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411 3.880 3.791 20 3.78 65 3.78 50 330 3.791 -- -- -- -- 3.74 10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66 12 3.67 30 510 3.698 -- -- -- -- 231 3.681 3.54 80 -- -- 3.555 10 112 3.557 -- -- 3.54 100 3.536 90 040 3.532 3.49 80 3.48 18 3.483 100 202 3.488 3.42 20 -- -- 3.389 15 501 3.411 3.31 20 3.31 35 3.313 20 240 3.314 3.20 10 -- -- -- -- 600 3.193
ferrierite samples. TABLE A __________________________________________________________________________ COMPARISON OF OF NATURAL AND STRONITIUM FERRIERITES WITH for 2/M 2/M 2/M a = 19.16 SYNTHETIC b = 14.13 Kamloops Lake STRONTIUM and c = 7.49 B.C., Canada Agoura, Ca. FERRIERITE* Relative Relative Relative dA dA Intensity dA Intensity dA Intensity __________________________________________________________________________ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 -- 200 9.61 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00 30 7.07 38 7.07 20 -- -- 6.96 15 6.98 6.61 20 6.59 3 6.61 55 011 5.84 50 5.75 15 15 310 5.82 -- -- 14 -- 220 -- -- 5.43 5 211 4.96 10- -- -- 4.96 15 121 4.964 -- -- -- -- -- -- 301 4.860 4.80 4.75 2 400 4.790 10- 1 130 4.574 -- -- -- 321 4.004 3.99 90 45 031 3.987 -- -- 3.94 35 3.94 420 3.965 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411 3.791 20 3.78 65 3.78 50 330 3.791 -- -- -- 3.74 10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66 12 3.67 30 510 3.698 -- -- 231 3.681 80 -- -- 10 3.557 -- 100 3.536 040 3.532 3.49 80 3.48 18 3.483 100 202 3.488 3.42 -- -- 3.389 15 501 3.411 3.31 20 3.31 35 240 3.20 10 -- -- -- 600 3.193
 ferrierite samples.
TABLE A __________________________________________________________________________ COmPARISON OF d SPACiNGs OF tWo NATuRAL aND SYNTHETIC STroNITiUM FERRIERITES WITH THE AlLOWEd LinES FerRiERITe TheoreTIcAL For i 2/M 2/m 2/M wheRe A = 19.16 fErRIERiTE sYNTHETiC b = 14.13 KamloopS LaKe fERRIERITE, STroNtIUM and c = 7.49 B.C., canAda Agoura, Ca. FeRRiERITE* reLatIVe RelAtiVe RelAtive hKL dA dA INtensity da INTensitY DA IntenSITy __________________________________________________________________________ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 3 -- -- 200 9.58 9.61 100 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00 30 7.07 38 7.07 20 -- -- 6.96 15 101 6.98 6.61 20 6.59 3 6.61 55 011 6.62 5.84 50 5.75 15 5.77 15 310 5.82 -- -- 5.64 14 -- -- 220 5.69 -- -- -- -- 5.43 5 211 5.44 4.96 10- -- -- 4.96 15 121 4.964 -- -- -- -- -- -- 301 4.860 4.80 10- 4.75 2 4.76 15 400 4.790 4.58 10- 4.56 1 -- 130 4.574 -- -- -- -- -- 321 4.004 3.99 90 3.98 35 3.99 45 031 3.987 -- -- 3.94 35 3.94 35 420 3.965 3.88 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411 3.880 3.791 20 3.78 65 3.78 50 330 3.791 -- -- -- -- 3.74 10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66 12 3.67 30 510 3.698 -- -- -- -- 231 3.681 3.54 80 -- -- 3.555 10 112 3.557 -- -- 3.54 100 3.536 90 040 3.532 3.49 80 3.48 18 3.483 100 202 3.488 3.42 20 -- -- 3.389 15 501 3.411 3.31 20 3.31 35 3.313 20 240 3.314 3.20 10 -- -- -- -- 600 3.193
 ferrierite samples.
TABLE  A _______ _____ ___ ___ __ ____ ____ ______________ _ ____ ______________________ _____  C O MPAR I SO N OFD SPACI N GS O F T WO  N ATU RA L  A ND SY NTH ETIC ST RONITIUM F ERR IE RITES WITH T H EALLOWED LI NES  FERRIERITEThe oretic al  fo r  I 2/ M 2 /M 2/ M Wher e  a = 1 9.16 FERR IE R ITE SY N THETICb =14.1 3 Kamloops Lake F E RR I ERITE, STRONTI UM and  c =7 . 49B.C ., CanadaAg oura, Ca. FER R IE R I T E*R elative Relat ive Relativ e  hk l dA d AInt e nsitydA In te n sit y dA Intens ity_________ ______ _ _______ _ _______ ______ ___ ___ ____ _ __ __ ___ __ _ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ ___ 11011 .3 7 11. 3 20 1 1 . 3 3---- 2 00 9. 58 9.61 100 9 .47  509 .49  75 0 20 7. 06 7 .0 0 307.07 3 8 7.0 720 -- -- 6.96 1 5 10 1 6.98 6. 6120  6. 59  3 6. 6 1 55 0 116.6 2 5.8450 5.75 155. 7 7 15  310 5.82 -- -- 5. 64 1 4-- -- 22 0 5.69 --  - -  -- -- 5 .4 3 5  211 5 .44 4 .961 0-  -- -- 4 .96 15 12 14.964 - --- ----  --  --  3014 .860  4.8010- 4.75  2 4. 7 6 15 400 4.790 4.58 10- 4.56 1- -  1 3 0 4. 574  -- -- -- - - -- 3214.00 4  3 .99 90 3. 98 35  3 . 99 45 031 3.987 -- --3. 94 353.9435 420 3.9653.88 10 -- - -  3.86 25  411 3. 8 80 3.791 20 3. 78 65  3.78 50 3 3 0 3.791-- --  -- -- 3 .74 10 00 2 3.745 3. 69503.6 6 1 2 3. 67 30 510 3.6 9 8  ----  -- --231  3.6813.5 4 8 0 - - - -3.555 10112 3.55 7--  - -3.5 4 100 3.536 90  0 403. 532  3.49 80 3.4 8 183.48 310 0  20 2 3.488 3. 4 2  20--  - - 3. 389  1 5 501  3.4 1 1 3 .31 203.31 35 3 .31 3  2024 03.314 3 .20 10 -- ----  -- 600 3. 19 3
 ferrierite_samples.
TABLE A___________________________________________________________________________ COMPARISON OF D_SPACINGS OF_TWO_NATURAL AND_SYNTHETIC_STRONITIUM FERRIERITES WITH_THE ALLOWED LINES_FERRIERITE Theoretical for I_2/M 2/M 2/M_Where_a = 19.16 FERRIERITE SYNTHETIC b = 14.13 Kamloops Lake FERRIERITE, STRONTIUM and c_=_7.49 B.C.,_Canada_Agoura,_Ca. FERRIERITE* Relative Relative Relative_hkl dA dA Intensity dA_Intensity dA_Intensity __________________________________________________________________________ 110 11.37 11.3 20 11.3 3_--_-- 200 9.58_9.61 100 9.47 50 9.49 75 020 7.06 7.00_30 7.07 38 7.07 20 --_-- 6.96 15_101_6.98_6.61 20 6.59 3_6.61 55 011 6.62 5.84 50_5.75 15 5.77 15 310 5.82_-- -- 5.64 14 -- -- 220_5.69 -- -- -- -- 5.43_5 211 5.44 4.96 10-_-- --_4.96 15 121 4.964 --_-- -- --_-- --_301 4.860 4.80_10- 4.75 2 4.76 15 400_4.790 4.58 10-_4.56 1 -- 130 4.574 --_--_-- -- --_321_4.004_3.99 90_3.98 35 3.99_45_031 3.987_--_-- 3.94 35 3.94 35 420_3.965_3.88 10 -- -- 3.86 25 411_3.880 3.791 20 3.78_65_3.78 50 330 3.791_-- -- -- -- 3.74_10 002 3.745 3.69 50 3.66_12 3.67_30 510_3.698 -- -- -- -- 231 3.681 3.54 80 -- --_3.555 10 112 3.557 -- --_3.54 100 3.536 90_040 3.532_3.49_80 3.48 18_3.483_100 202_3.488 3.42 20 -- -- 3.389 15_501 3.411_3.31 20 3.31 35 3.313 20_240 3.314 3.20 10_--_-- -- -- 600 3.193