 two coiling pans are driven by a motor via a clutch which can be engaged and released as desired and alternately. The electronic controller detects the cable feed via a length sensor and the position of the cable ducts via a proximity switch. It synchronizes the drives by actuating electropneumatic control pistons. One control piston moves, for example, the cable duct between two positions assigned to the respective coiling pans. Two further control pistons operate the one clutch each between the continuously revolving motor and the coiling pans. A cyclic, synchronized sequence is thus possible provided that there are no slip or feed losses during cable preparation. In the coiling pans themselves, play is possible since the cables are introduced freely. Undesired friction and cable damage cannot be entirely ruled out. The free introduction does not make it possible to achieve exactly reproducible coil shapes.
An additional disk brake likewise controlled by the controller is provided in order to brake a rotating coiling pan as soon as it is no longer driven. This design therefore has only two operating states of the coiling pans, rotating at full speed or braked. An intelligently controlled drive having variable speeds, acceleration moments or variable brake moments or feed reversal is however not provided in spite of the electronic controller.
Apart from this, this design is fairly complicated from the point of view of operation and programming. Thus, the single controller must be operated with all parameters relevant to the result. Reprogramming must take place if peripheral devices (additional devices) are changed. However, even if only operating parameters relating to the main tool or to the feeds are changed, corresponding changes in the operating parameters of the additional devices must be programmed by the operator. This is time-consuming and by no means tolerant of errors. Before a corresponding arrangement is ready for operation, test runs should always be made, in which waste is likely under certain circumstances.
The principle of a central computer for actuating a plurality of devices for cable preparation is also applied in U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,605 of 1994. There, there is a first command bus for the up-circuit device and a second command bus for the xe2x80x9ccut and stripxe2x80x9d device. One command bus each runs from each of the two devices to the computer and back (status bus). Since the actuation is thus performed only by the computer, its program must always be adapted if a different device is connected.
In comparison, U.S
two coiling pans are driven by a motor via a clutch which can be hire and release as desired and alternately. The electronic control detect the cable feed via a length sensor and the side of the cable ducts via a proximity substitution. It synchronize the drives by motivate electropneumatic control pistons. One dominance piston motion, for example, the cable television duct between two positions assign to the respective coiling pan. Two further control pistons operate the one clutch bag each between the continuously revolving motor and the coiling pan. A cyclic, synchronized sequence is thus possible provided that there be no slip or feed losses during cable preparation. In the coiling pan themselves, play is possible since the cables are introduced freely. Undesired friction and cable damage cannot be entirely ruled out. The free presentation does not make it possible to achieve precisely reproducible coil shapes. 
 An additional disk brake alike controlled by the controller is provided in order to brake a rotate coiling pan as soon as it is no longer driven. This design therefore accept only two operating states of the coiling pan, rotating at entire speed or braked. An intelligently controlled drive having varying speeds, acceleration moments or variable brake moments or feed reversal is however not provided in spite of the electronic controller. 
 aside from this, this design is fairly complicated from the point of view of operation and scheduling. Thus, the single controller must be operated with all parameter relevant to the result. Reprogramming must necessitate place if peripheral devices (additional devices) are changed. However, even if entirely operating parameters relating to the main tool or to the feeds are changed, corresponding changes in the operate parameters of the additional device must be programmed by the operator. This is time - consuming and by no means tolerant of error. Before a corresponding arrangement is ready for operation, test runs should always be produce, in which waste is likely under certain circumstances. 
 The principle of a central computer for trip a plurality of devices for cable training is also applied in U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,605 of 1994. There, there is a first instruction bus for the up - circuit device and a second command bus for the xe2x80x9ccut and stripxe2x80x9d device. One command bus each runs from each of the two device to the computer and back (status bus). Since the actuation is thus do only by the computer, its program must always be adapted if a different device is connected. 
 In comparison, U.S
 twl coiling pans are drivek by a motor via a clutrh whicg can be engaged and released as desmred and qlternately. The electrunic contgoller derectw the cable feed via a lehnth sznwor and the poxition of dhe cable ductv xic a proximity switch. It synchronizes the drovfs by actuatind eltctwopnslmctic control pistons. One controm pistoi moves, for exakple, the cable duct betweej twl positions assignfd to the rgapesrive coiling pans. Two further conttol pistons operate the one clutzh eaeh between jkw clttinuously cevolvpng motor and the coining pams. A cyclic, sykchroiizee sequence is thus povsible provided thwt there drz no slip or feed loswew durhng wabld prdpadavioh. In tje roiling pana themselvew, play is possible xigbr the cables are igtwoduced freely. Undesired friction and cdbls damage cannot be entieely ruled out. The frge introdustion does not make it possible to achieve exactlf repcoaucnnjd clil shapes.
An additional disk brake likewise cjhttokled by the coktroller is providrd im order to braye a rotafing coiling pan ad soon ws it is no logger driven. This design therefoee has only nwo iperating states oy the coiliny pans, rotaying at full speed or bxaked. Zn intelligfntly conffolled drive havkng vdriable speeds, acceleratiog moments or rariable brale momqnts or fefd reyarsal is however nlt prlvhded in splte of the electronic controllec.
Epart from thos, thps design is fsirly complicwted from the koint of riew ow operatioh and pcogramming. Trus, the singla controller kust be jperqted with auu parameters rrlevant to the resuot. Reprogramming mmst txie place if pernkhetql devices (addotiunaj fetices) dre changed. Vowexer, rven kf only opevatkng larameters relating do tge main tool or to tme feeds qre chanded, corresponcing changes in tht opereting 'arameyerf of the additional devices muat be prohraimed by the jperqtor. This is time-consuming and by no means tolerant of errors. Before q corresponding arrcnnement is reedy fow operatimn, test runs should qlways be made, in which waste is likelg undes cerhain circumstances.
The principle of a central computer for actuating a plueality of devices ror vable pxepcration is elro applied in U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,605 of 1994. There, there is a fmrst commatd bus for the up-circuit devicr xnd a second zommand bus for the xe2x80x9dcut and stripxe2x80x9d device. One command nus each runs from each pf the tqo debices nk vhe computer and bacl (statbs bus). Since rhe wctuation is ghux ierformed lnly bv the computer, its program must aoways ve adapted if a dihferent devige is cknnectgd.
In comparison, U.A
two coiling pans are driven by a a which can engaged and released electronic detects the cable via a length and the position of the cable via a proximity switch. It synchronizes the drives by actuating electropneumatic control pistons. control piston moves, for example, the cable duct between two positions assigned to respective pans. further pistons operate the one clutch each between the continuously revolving motor and the coiling pans. A synchronized sequence is thus possible provided that there no slip or feed during cable preparation. In the pans play is since cables introduced freely. Undesired and cable damage cannot be entirely ruled out. The free introduction does not make it possible to exactly reproducible An additional brake controlled the controller is order to brake a rotating coiling as it is no longer driven. This design has only operating states of the coiling pans, at full speed or braked. An intelligently controlled having variable speeds, acceleration moments or variable brake moments or feed reversal is however not spite of the electronic Apart from this, design fairly from point of of operation and programming. Thus, the single controller must be operated all parameters relevant to the result. Reprogramming must take place devices devices) are changed. even if only operating relating the main tool or feeds changed, the parameters the additional devices must programmed by the operator. This time-consuming and by no a corresponding arrangement is ready for operation, test should always be made, in which waste likely under certain circumstances. The principle of a central computer for actuating plurality of cable preparation is also applied in U.S. Pat. 5,343,605 of 1994. There, is a first command bus for the up-circuit device a command bus the xe2x80x9ccut and device. One command each runs from the two to computer bus). Since the actuation is thus only the computer, its program must be a different device is connected. In comparison, U.S
 two coiling pans are driven by A motor via a ClutcH whIch CaN be eNgagEd and released aS DesiRed and alternately. The elEctroNiC ContROlLer deTects thE CaBLE feEd ViA a lEnGTh SensoR anD the posItion of the CabLe Ducts via a proXImIty switch. IT syNchronizes thE drIves by AcTuaTIng elEctRopneUmatic COntrol Pistons. OnE cONtrol pISton movES, FoR exaMple, the cable duct bETwEEn two positions AssignEd TO tHE ResPecTive coilinG pAns. TwO Further COnTROL piSTons operate thE one clutch eACh bEtween ThE coNTinuouSly reVoLVinG motor and thE coiLing pans. A Cyclic, SYnchronIZed sequEnce is ThuS poSsibLE pRoVidEd THat THeRe aRE no Slip or feEd LoSses dUrinG CABLe prEpaRatiOn. In tHe coiling pans TheMselVEs, pLay is PossiBle sInCe the Cables Are inTrOduced freely. UndEsirEd frictioN anD cAblE dAmage CAnnot bE enTirEly ruleD out. The FRee InTRODuCtion does not make it PoSSIbLe to achiEve exaCTlY rEProducibLe CoiL shaPES.
An adDitiONaL disk braKe likeWIsE cOntrollEd By the cOnTroLleR is prOVideD in ordEr to brakE a rotATing coiling pan AS soon as it is no LOnGER dRIven. thiS design therEforE Has oNly tWO oPerATing sTates Of THe COiling pans, rotating aT fUll speEd or bRaked. An intellIgently conTROLled drivE havINg VAriable speeds, aCceleRation momeNTs or variAble bRake momeNts or feed REVersal is HowEveR noT prOVIdEd in spite of thE ELectRoNic contRolLer.
AparT frOm tHis, ThiS dEsign is faIrly compLiCaTeD fRom The poINt of view Of OpeRaTioN and pROgrammIng. ThUs, thE sInGLe cOntrollER mUST be oPeRaTed wIth AlL paraMeteRS reLevant tO the resulT. RePRogrAmMiNg must tAke place if perIpHeral devicEs (AddItionaL DEvices) arE changed. However, even if onLY operatIng ParamEterS relating To tHe main TooL Or to thE feeds Are chAnGed, CORrespONDiNg cHaNges in the oPERatIng paRaMeteRs of the Additional devices mUSt bE programmed by The OperATOr. thiS Is TIme-CoNSumING and by no means toLerant of erRoRS. BEfore a corrESpoNdIng arraNgement Is reaDY for opeRation, tesT runs shouLd AlwaYS Be mAde, in which Waste is lIkely undeR CertaIN cIrcumStaNces.
ThE pRinCiple Of a cenTRal CompuTer for AcTuatinG a pluRaLity of deVices for cable preparatioN is alsO applIed In U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,605 Of 1994. THEre, There is a fIrst Command bus For The Up-cirCuiT DevicE and A SeConD CommaNd buS For the xe2x80X9CcUt aND StRipxe2x80x9d devICE. one CommaNd bUS each rUns fRom each of the two deVIces to the compuTer aND BacK (stATus bUs). since the actuatIon Is THUs perforMeD only by the cOmputer, iTs PRograM must aLways bE adapteD IF a DIffereNt deVicE is connecTed.
in COmparisOn, u.S
 two coiling pans are driv en by a mo tor v iaa c lu tchwhic h can be engag e d an d released as desiredand a lt e rnat e ly . The  electr o ni c con tr ol ler  d e te cts t hecable f eed via alen gt h sensor and th e position  of  the cable d uct s viaapro x imity  sw itch.  It sy n chroni zes the d ri v es bya ctuatin g el ectr opneumatic contro l  p i stons. One con trol p is t on m ove s,for exampl e,  thec able du c tb e t wee n  two position s assignedt o t he res pe cti v e coil ing p an s . T wo furthercont rol pisto ns ope r ate the one clu tch ea chbet ween th econ ti n uou s ly  re v olv ing moto ran d the  coi l i n g  pan s.A cy clic,  synchronized  se quen c e i s thu s pos sibl eprovi ded th at th er e are no slip o r fe ed losses  du ri ngca ble p r eparat ion . I n the c oilingp ans  t h e m se lves, play is poss ib l e  s ince the  cable s  a re introduc ed  fr eely . Undes ired fr iction a nd cab l eda mage ca nn ot been tir ely  rule d  out . Thefree int roduc t ion does not m a ke it possibl e  t o ac h ieve  ex actly repro duci b le c oils ha pes . 
An a dditi on a ld isk brake likewiseco ntroll ed by  the controll er is prov i d e d in ord er t o  b r ake a rotating  coil ing pan as soon asit is  no long er driven . This des ign  th ere for e ha s only two op e r atin gstatesofthe coi lin g p ans , r ot ating atfull spe ed  o rbr ake d. An intellig en tly  c ont rolle d  drive  havi ng v ar ia b lespeeds, ac c e lera ti on  mom ent sor va riab l e b rake mo ments orfee d  rev er sa l is ho wever not pro vi ded in spi te  of  the e l e ctroniccontroller.
Apart fromt his, th isdesig n is  fairly c omp licate d f r om the  point  of v ie w o f opera t i on  an dprogrammin g .  Th us, t he  sin gle con troller must be op e rat ed with all p ara mete r s  r ele v an t  to  t h e r e s ult. Reprogramm ing must t ak e  p lace if pe r iph er al devi ces (ad ditio n al devi ces) arechanged.Ho weve r ,  ev en if only  operati ng parame t ers r e la tingtothe ma in  to ol or  to th e  fe eds a re cha ng ed, co rresp on ding cha nges in the operating p aramet ers o f t he additi ona l  de vices mus t be  programme d b y t he op era t or. T hisi stim e -cons umin g  and by n o  m ean s to lerant of e r r o rs.  Befo rea  corre spon ding arrangementi s ready for op erat i o n,tes t  run sshould alwaysbema d e , in whi ch  waste is l ikely un de r  cert ain ci rcumst ances.T h ep rincip le o f a  centralcom pu t er forac tu a ting a  plu ra lity o f devi c es f o r  cable preparati on is a lso a p pli ed in  U .S. Pat .  No.  5,343,605  of 1994. T here,ther e isa first  c ommand  bu sfor the up - circuit d evice  and ase cond  co mmandbusf o r the  xe2 x8 0x9 ccut ands t ri p xe 2x 8 0x9 d de vice.  O ne c ommand bu s  each ru nsf rom eac hoft h e twod ev i c es to thecom puter a nd back (s t atus bu s ). Si nce th e actu ation i s  th us  perfor med o nly by th e compute r , i ts  pro gram mus talwa ys  be  a dapted if a dif ferent d evice is c onnect ed. In c o mparis on , U.S
 two_coiling pans_are driven by a_motor via_a_clutch which_can_be engaged and_released as desired_and alternately. The electronic_controller detects the_cable_feed via a length sensor and the position of the cable ducts via a_proximity_switch. It_synchronizes_the_drives by actuating electropneumatic control_pistons. One control piston moves,_for example,_the cable duct between two positions assigned to_the_respective coiling pans._Two further control pistons operate the one clutch each_between the continuously revolving motor and_the coiling pans._A_cyclic,_synchronized sequence is thus_possible provided that there are no_slip or feed losses during cable_preparation. In the coiling pans themselves, play_is possible since the cables are_introduced freely. Undesired friction and_cable damage_cannot be entirely ruled out._The free introduction_does not_make it possible_to achieve exactly reproducible coil shapes.
An_additional disk brake_likewise controlled by the controller is_provided_in order to_brake_a_rotating coiling_pan as soon_as_it is_no_longer driven. This design therefore has_only_two operating states of the coiling pans,_rotating at full speed_or_braked. An intelligently controlled_drive having variable speeds, acceleration_moments or variable brake moments or_feed reversal_is however_not provided in spite of the electronic controller.
Apart from this, this_design is fairly complicated from the_point of view of_operation and_programming._Thus, the single_controller_must be_operated with all parameters relevant to the_result. Reprogramming_must take place if peripheral devices_(additional devices) are changed._However,_even if only operating parameters relating_to the main tool or to_the feeds are changed, corresponding_changes_in_the operating parameters of the_additional devices must be programmed by_the operator. This_is time-consuming and by no means tolerant_of_errors. Before a corresponding arrangement is_ready_for operation, test runs should always_be_made,_in which waste is likely_under certain circumstances.
The principle of a_central computer for actuating a plurality of devices for_cable preparation is_also applied in U.S. Pat._No._5,343,605_of 1994. There, there is a first command bus for_the up-circuit_device and a_second command bus for the xe2x80x9ccut and stripxe2x80x9d device. One_command bus each runs from each of_the two devices to the computer and back (status bus). Since_the actuation is thus performed only by the_computer, its program must always be adapted_if a different device_is_connected.
In comparison, U.S