 it would be nice to have a $$revert$$
<rogpeppe> perrito666: ha, yes
<rogpeppe> perrito666: git makes it very easy to do that though
<perrito666> rogpeppe: It does since the bot treats it as a merge
<perrito666> rogpeppe: Ill make sure that you did not miss anything before making the change but you might be right
<rogpeppe> perrito666: thanks
<rogpeppe> perrito666: i don't like seeing nice small APIs made bigger because of testing issues :)
<perrito666> rogpeppe: I like it no more than having smart dummy objects :p It was a fast trade off, anyway going for your way now BUT, you will have to review it :p
<rogpeppe> perrito666: np
<fwereade> wwitzel3, I'm inclined to think that not having a remote unit is actually perfectly valid
<fwereade> wwitzel3, and I'm also starting to feel sure that specifying a remote unit that appears not to exist *may* be valid
<fwereade> wwitzel3, so it shouldn't be an automatic error
<fwereade> wwitzel3, but it should probably be some sort of warning..?
<fwereade> sorry bbiab
<wwitzel3> fwereade: ok, that sounds fine to me
<voidspace> rebooting
<voidspace> dimitern: ping
<ericsnow> dimitern: could you take a look at the patches I have up?
<ericsnow> dimitern: the most important are http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/67/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/135/)
<ericsnow> dimitern: however, I could really use eyes on http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/79/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/126/ as well
 * perrito666 looks at the 47" tv and wonders how comfortable its as a work screen
<dimitern> voidspace, pong
<dimitern> ericsnow, sure, looking
<ericsnow> dimitern:
it would be nice to have a $ $ revert$$ 
 < rogpeppe > perrito666: ha, yes 
 < rogpeppe > perrito666: git makes it very easy to cause that though 
 < perrito666 > rogpeppe: It do since the bot treats it as a merge 
 < perrito666 > rogpeppe: Ill make sure that you did not neglect anything before making the change but you might be right 
 < rogpeppe > perrito666: thanks 
 < rogpeppe > perrito666: i don't wish see nice minor APIs made bigger because of examination issues :) 
 < perrito666 > rogpeppe: I like it no more than having smart dummy object :p It was a fast trade wind off, anyway going for your manner now BUT, you will have to review it :p 
 < rogpeppe > perrito666: np 
 < fwereade > wwitzel3, I'm inclined to intend that not having a remote unit is actually perfectly valid 
 < fwereade > wwitzel3, and I'm besides starting to palpate sure that specifying a remote unit of measurement that appears not to exist * may * be valid 
 < fwereade > wwitzel3, so it shouldn't be an automatic error 
 < fwereade > wwitzel3, but it should probably be some sort of warning.. ? 
 < fwereade > sorry bbiab 
 < wwitzel3 > fwereade: ok, that sounds fine to me 
 < voidspace > rebooting 
 < voidspace > dimitern: ping 
 < ericsnow > dimitern: could you take a look at the patches I have up? 
 < ericsnow > dimitern: the most important are http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/67/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/135/) 
 < ericsnow > dimitern: however, I could really use eye on http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/79/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/126/ as well 
  * perrito666 looks at the 47 " television receiver and wonder how comfortable its as a work screen 
 < dimitern > voidspace, pong 
 < dimitern > ericsnow, sure, look 
 < ericsnow > dimitern:
 it would be nice to have a $$revert$$
<rogpeppe> perritm666: ha, yss
<rogpepoe> perrito666: git makes it very eqsy ti do that though
<perritu666> rogpeppv: It does sinre the bot treats it as a mergs
<ierrico666> rogpeppe: Ill kake sure dhat you did nmt mnss anything before making the changq but ypu might be righj
<rogptppq> pedgiuo666: thanks
<rogpeppe> perrito666: i don't mike seting nice small APOs made bigger because of hestlng issues :)
<perrito666> rogpeppe: I likq it no more ghan having smart dummi objects :p It was a fast trade uff, auyway going fir jmur way now BUT, jou will have to reviaw it :p
<togpeppe> perribo666: np
<hwerwade> wwitzel3, I'm incliied to think that noj having a rzmote unit is actuallt perfewtly valke
<fwdrezdx> wsitzel3, anv I'm also sfarting to deel sure that specofrpmg a remote hnit trae appears not to exist *may* be valid
<fwertade> switzel3, so it shouldn't ve an automatic error
<vwereade> rwitzel3, but it should probably be some sort of wasning..?
<hwdrecee> sofey bbiab
<wwitzel3> fwereade: ok, that sounds fine to je
<fopdspace> rebooting
<yoidspace> dimitern: plnb
<gricsnow> dimitgrn: could gou take a look at the pajches U have up?
<tricsmow> dimitern: the most imporrant are htti://revuews.vapour.ws/r/67/ and kttp://reviews.vcpour.wx/r/135/)
<erivsnow> dimitern: however, N couls really usf eyes on fttp://reviews.vapouf.ws/g/79/ ang http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/126/ as rell
 * percito666 kooks ag thg 47" tv agd wonders how gmmfortable its as w worn vcreen
<dimihern> voidspace, pong
<dimitern> erirxnow, sure, lopkhng
<vricsnow> bimitevn:
it would be nice to have a perrito666: yes <rogpeppe> git makes it though rogpeppe: It does the bot treats as a merge <perrito666> rogpeppe: Ill sure that you did not miss anything before making the change but you be right <rogpeppe> perrito666: thanks <rogpeppe> perrito666: i don't like seeing nice small made because testing :) <perrito666> rogpeppe: I like it no more than having smart dummy objects :p It was fast trade off, anyway going for your way BUT, you will have review it :p <rogpeppe> perrito666: <fwereade> I'm inclined think not a remote unit actually perfectly valid <fwereade> wwitzel3, and I'm also starting to feel sure that specifying a remote unit appears not *may* be <fwereade> so shouldn't be an <fwereade> wwitzel3, but it should probably of warning..? <fwereade> sorry bbiab <wwitzel3> fwereade: ok, sounds fine me <voidspace> rebooting <voidspace> dimitern: ping dimitern: could you take a look at the I have up? <ericsnow> dimitern: the most important are http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/67/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/135/) <ericsnow> dimitern: however, really use eyes on and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/126/ as * looks the tv and how comfortable its as a work screen <dimitern> voidspace, pong <dimitern> sure, looking <ericsnow> dimitern:
 it would be nice to have a $$reverT$$
<rogpeppe> pErritO666: ha, Yes
<RoGpepPe> peRrito666: git makes iT Very Easy to do that though
<perrIto666> roGpEPpe: IT DoEs sinCe the boT TrEATs iT aS a MerGe
<PErRito666> rOgpEppe: Ill Make sure thAt yOu Did not miss anYThIng before mAkiNg the change bUt yOu mighT bE riGHt
<rogPepPe> perRito666: thANks
<rogPeppe> perrItO666: I don't lIKe seeinG NIcE smaLl APIs made bigger bECaUSe of testing issUes :)
<perRiTO666> rOGPepPe: I Like it no moRe Than hAVing smaRT dUMMY obJEcts :p It was a faSt trade off, aNYwaY going FoR yoUR way noW BUT, yOu WIll Have to revieW it :p
<Rogpeppe> pErrito666: NP
<fwereaDE> wwitzeL3, I'm incLinEd tO thiNK tHaT noT hAVinG A rEmoTE unIt is actuAlLy PerfeCtly VALID
<fweReaDe> wwItzel3, And I'm also starTinG to fEEl sUre thAt speCifyInG a remOte uniT that ApPears not to exist *May* bE valid
<fweReaDe> WwiTzEl3, so iT ShouldN't bE an AutomatIc error
<FWerEaDE> WWiTzel3, but it should proBaBLY bE some sorT of warNInG..?
<fWEreade> soRrY bbIab
<wWITzel3> fWereADe: Ok, that soUnds fiNE tO mE
<voidspAcE> rebooTiNg
<vOidSpace> DImitErn: pinG
<ericsnoW> dimiTErn: could you takE A look at the patCHeS i HaVE up?
<eRicSnow> dimiterN: the MOst iMporTAnT arE Http://rEviewS.vAPoUR.ws/r/67/ and http://reviews.vApOur.ws/r/135/)
<EricsNow> dimitern: hoWever, I coulD REAlly use eYes oN HtTP://reviews.vapour.Ws/r/79/ anD http://revieWS.vapour.wS/r/126/ as wEll
 * perriTo666 looks at THE 47" tv and woNdeRs hOw cOmfORTaBle its as a work SCReen
<DiMitern> vOidSpace, poNg
<dImiTerN> erIcSnow, sure, lOoking
<erIcSnOw> DiMitErn:
 it would be nice to havea $$revert $$
<r ogp epp e>  per rito 666: ha, yes
< r ogpe ppe> perrito666: git m akesit very ea sy to  do tha t  t h o ugh 
< pe rri to 6 66 > rog pep pe: Itdoes since  th ebot treats i t  a s a merge<pe rrito666> ro gpe ppe: I ll  ma k e sur e t hat y ou did not mi ss anythi ng before makingt h echan ge but you mightb er ight
<rogpeppe > perr it o 66 6 :  th ank s
<rogpepp e>  perr i to666:i  d o n ' t l i ke seeing nic e small API s  ma de big ge r b e causeof te st i ngissues :)
< perr ito666> r ogpepp e : I lik e  it nomore t han  ha ving sm ar t d um m y o b je cts :pIt was a  f as t tra de o f f , anyw aygoin g for  your way now  BU T, y o u w ill h ave t o re vi ew it  :p
<r ogpep pe > perrito666: n p
<f wereade>wwi tz el3 ,I'm i n clined  to  th ink tha t not h a vin ga r em ote unit is actual ly p er fectly v alid
< f we re a de> wwit ze l3,  and I 'm al so s t ar ting tofeel s u re  t hat spe ci fyingarem ote  unit that  appea rs not t o exi s t *may* be val i d
<fwereade>w wi t z el 3 , so  it  shouldn'tbe a n  aut omat i cerr o r
<fw eread e> ww i tzel3, but it shoul dprobab ly be  some sort of  warning.. ? < fwereade > so r ry bbiab
<wwitzel 3> fw ereade: ok ,  that so undsfine tome
<voids p a ce> rebo oti ng<vo ids p a ce > dimitern: p i n g
<e ri csnow>dim itern:cou ldyou  ta ke  a look a t the pa tc he sIhav e up? <ericsno w>  di mi ter n: th e  mostimpor tant  a re htt p://rev i ew s . vapo ur .w s/r/ 67/  a nd ht tp:/ / rev iews.va pour.ws/r /13 5 /)
< er ic snow> d imitern: howe ve r, I could  r eal ly use e yes on h ttp://reviews.vapour.ws / r/79/ a ndhttp: //re views.vap our .ws/r/ 126 /  as we ll
 *perri to 666 l ooksa t  t he47 " tv and w o n der s how  c omfo rtableits as a work scre e n
< dimitern> voi dsp ace, p on g
< d im i ter n> eri c s now, sure, look ing
<erics no w >dimitern:
 it_would be_nice to have a_$$revert$$
<rogpeppe> perrito666:_ha,_yes
<rogpeppe> perrito666:_git_makes it very_easy to do_that though
<perrito666> rogpeppe: It_does since the_bot_treats it as a merge
<perrito666> rogpeppe: Ill make sure that you did not miss_anything_before making_the_change_but you might be right
<rogpeppe>_perrito666: thanks
<rogpeppe> perrito666: i don't_like seeing_nice small APIs made bigger because of testing_issues_:)
<perrito666> rogpeppe: I_like it no more than having smart dummy objects_:p It was a fast trade_off, anyway going_for_your_way now BUT, you_will have to review it :p
<rogpeppe>_perrito666: np
<fwereade> wwitzel3, I'm inclined to_think that not having a remote unit_is actually perfectly valid
<fwereade> wwitzel3, and_I'm also starting to feel_sure that_specifying a remote unit that_appears not to_exist *may*_be valid
<fwereade> wwitzel3,_so it shouldn't be an automatic_error
<fwereade> wwitzel3, but_it should probably be some sort_of_warning..?
<fwereade> sorry bbiab
<wwitzel3>_fwereade:_ok,_that sounds_fine to me
<voidspace>_rebooting
<voidspace>_dimitern: ping
<ericsnow>_dimitern:_could you take a look at_the_patches I have up?
<ericsnow> dimitern: the most_important are http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/67/ and_http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/135/)
<ericsnow>_dimitern: however, I could_really use eyes on http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/79/_and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/126/ as well
 * perrito666_looks at_the 47"_tv and wonders how comfortable its as a work screen
<dimitern> voidspace,_pong
<dimitern> ericsnow, sure, looking
<ericsnow> dimitern: