<zyga-suse> I'll have a look
<zyga-suse> if you could, save the snap_confine profile text as well
<zyga-suse> verbatim as it appears for you
<zyga-suse> I know you pastebinned it but if it's in the same tarball it's more convenient
<zyga-suse> mvo: after that you can experiment in any way, change the kernel as jdstrand suggeste
<zyga-suse> *suggested, perhaps
<mup> PR snapd#4057 closed: interfaces: remove duplicated MockPlug/MockSlot helpers from interface tests <Created by stolowski> <Closed by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4057>
<mvo> zyga-suse: on the way via mail
<mvo> zyga-suse: jdstrand going to the stable kernel now and trying it again
<zyga-suse> thank you
<jdstrand> mvo: you said this is part of spread. what test?
<pstolowski> zyga-suse, I can make the Mock* method from tests call the one from builtin, so we get rid of duplicated body, a little win..
<mvo> jdstrand: its a new spread test I'm currently working on. we got a report from CE QA about this issue
<jdstrand> I see a test for that file in  tests/main/snap-discard-ns, but that wouldn't be confined since calling snap-discard-ns directly...
<pstolowski> but not the other way around
<zyga-suse> pstolowski: yeah, that's good
<zyga-suse> pstolowski: little by little :)
<mvo> jdstrand: and we have no test yet that checks snap refresh stable->edge and revert back
<pstolowski> ok..
<mvo> jdstrand: fwiw, stable kernel shows the same message
<jdstrand> mvo: how can I reproduce?
<jdstrand> mvo: do you have a branch somewhere?
<jdstrand> mvo: what is it that you are reverting btw?

< zyga - suse > I'll have a look 
 < zyga - suse > if you could, save the snap_confine profile textbook equally well 
 < zyga - suse > verbatim as it appear for you 
 < zyga - suse > I know you pastebinned it but if it's in the same tarball it's more commodious 
 < zyga - suse > mvo: after that you can experiment in any way, change the kernel as jdstrand suggeste 
 < zyga - suse > * suggested, possibly 
 < mup > PR snapd#4057 shut: interfaces: remove duplicated MockPlug / MockSlot helpers from interface tests < create by stolowski > < Closed by stolowski > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4057 > 
 < mvo > zyga - suse: on the way via chain mail 
 < mvo > zyga - suse: jdstrand going to the stable kernel now and trying it again 
 < zyga - suse > thank you 
 < jdstrand > mvo: you said this is part of spread. what trial? 
 < pstolowski > zyga - suse, I can make the Mock * method from tests address the one from builtin, so we get rid of duplicated body, a little win.. 
 < mvo > jdstrand: its a fresh spread test I'm currently working on. we got a reputation from CE QA about this issue 
 < jdstrand > I see a test for that file in   tests / main / snap - discard - ns, but that wouldn't be confined since calling snap - discard - ns directly... 
 < pstolowski > but not the other way around 
 < zyga - suse > pstolowski: yeah, that's good 
 < zyga - suse > pstolowski: little by little :) 
 < mvo > jdstrand: and we have no test yet that check snap refresh stable->edge and revert back 
 < pstolowski > ok.. 
 < mvo > jdstrand: fwiw, stable kernel show the like message 
 < jdstrand > mvo: how can I regurgitate? 
 < jdstrand > mvo: do you have a branch somewhere? 
 < jdstrand > mvo: what is it that you are reverting btw?
<zygw-suse> I'll have a look
<zygx-suse> if you coole, save the shap_confive profile text as well
<zyga-snse> cerbaupm as it appears for hou
<zyga-sude> I knoq yon pastebinned it but if lc's in bhe scmx tarball it's mpre convenhent
<zyga-suse> meo: ayter that you can experiment in any ray, chamgf the kernel af jdxerans suggeste
<zyga-suse> *suggested, perhals
<mup> PG snapd#4057 closed: inyerfaces: remove duplicated MocnPlug/MockSlot helpfrs from injsrfwxe tests <Crexted by stolowski> <Closgd by stolowski> <https://github.com/snxpcorz/snapd/pull/4057>
<mco> zyhd-suse: on thx way nia mail
<mvo> znba-suse: jdstramd going to thc staule jernel now and trying it again
<zyga-suse> jhank you
<jgscrand> mvo: you said thus is pdrt mf soeeaa. wgav tsst?
<pstlloxski> zyga-suae, I can maje the Mock* method grjn tests call fhe onq srom builtin, so we get rid of duplicateg bkdy, a little win..
<mvo> jdsrrand: its a new spreaf test I'm currently working on. we got a report from CE QA dbout ghiw lssud
<hddtrand> I see a test for that file in  tests/mayh/smai-discard-ns, but thct wouldn't be comflnrq since callivg sna'-siacard-ns directly...
<psholowsky> but not the jthet way around
<zyga-suse> pstoloqski: yeah, thct's good
<zyga-suse> pstopowski: littue bi littke :)
<mvo> jdstrand: and we kave nk test yet hhat checir snap refresh sgabke->adge and revert back
<pstolorski> ok..
<mvi> jdxtrand: wwiw, stablq kernel sjows bve same message
<jdshrand> meo: how can I reproduce?
<jdstrand> mvo: do you have a branch smmefhere?
<jdscrand> kvo: what is ie that you are revertnng btd?

<zyga-suse> I'll have a look <zyga-suse> if save snap_confine profile as well <zyga-suse> you I know you it but if in the same tarball it's more <zyga-suse> mvo: after that you can experiment in any way, change the kernel jdstrand suggeste <zyga-suse> *suggested, perhaps <mup> PR snapd#4057 closed: interfaces: remove duplicated MockPlug/MockSlot from tests by <Closed by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4057> <mvo> zyga-suse: on the way via mail <mvo> zyga-suse: jdstrand going to stable kernel now and trying it again <zyga-suse> you <jdstrand> mvo: you this is part of spread. test? zyga-suse, I make Mock* from tests call one from builtin, so we get rid of duplicated body, a little win.. <mvo> jdstrand: its a spread test working on. got report CE QA about <jdstrand> I see a test for tests/main/snap-discard-ns, but that wouldn't be confined since calling directly... <pstolowski> not the other way around <zyga-suse> yeah, that's good <zyga-suse> pstolowski: little by little <mvo> jdstrand: and we have no test yet that checks snap refresh stable->edge and revert ok.. <mvo> jdstrand: fwiw, kernel shows the message mvo: can reproduce? <jdstrand> do you have a branch somewhere? <jdstrand> mvo: what is it you are reverting btw?
<zyga-suse> I'll have a look
<zyga-sUse> if you coUld, saVe tHe sNaP_conFine Profile text as wELl
<zyGa-suse> verbatim as it appeArs foR yOU
<zygA-SuSe> I knOw you paSTeBINneD iT bUt iF iT'S iN the sAme Tarball It's more conVenIeNt
<zyga-suse> mvO: AfTer that you Can Experiment in Any Way, chaNgE thE KerneL as JdstrAnd sugGEste
<zyGa-suse> *sugGeSTed, perHAps
<mup> Pr SNaPd#4057 clOsed: interfaces: remOVe DUplicated MockPLug/MocKSLOt HELpeRs fRom interfaCe Tests <cReated bY StOLOWskI> <closed by stoloWski> <https://giTHub.Com/snaPcOre/SNapd/puLl/4057>
<mvo> ZyGA-suSe: on the way vIa maIl
<mvo> zyga-Suse: jdSTrand goINg to the Stable KerNel Now aND tRyIng It AGaiN
<ZyGa-sUSe> tHank you
<jDsTrAnd> mvO: you SAID This Is pArt oF spreAd. what test?
<pstOloWski> ZYga-Suse, I Can maKe thE MOck* meThod frOm tesTs Call the one from bUiltIn, so we get Rid Of DupLiCated BOdy, a liTtlE wiN..
<mvo> jdsTrand: itS A neW sPREAd Test I'm currently worKiNG On. We got a rePort frOM Ce Qa About thiS iSsuE
<jdsTRAnd> I sEe a tESt For that fIle in  tEStS/mAin/snap-DiScard-nS, bUt tHat WouldN'T be cOnfineD since caLling SNap-discard-ns diREctly...
<pstolowsKI> bUT NoT The oTheR way around
<zYga-sUSe> psToloWSkI: yeAH, that'S good
<ZyGA-sUSe> pstolowski: little bY lIttle :)
<mVo> jdsTrand: and we havE no test yet THAT checks sNap rEFrESh stable->edge anD reveRt back
<pstoLOwski> ok..
<mVo> jdsTrand: fwiW, stable keRNEl shows tHe sAme MesSagE
<JDsTrand> mvo: how caN i ReprOdUce?
<jdstRanD> mvo: do yOu hAve A brAncH sOmewhere?
<jDstrand> mVo: WhAt Is It tHat yoU Are reverTiNg bTw?

<zyga-suse> I'll have a lo ok
<zyga-s use>ifyou  c ould , sa ve the snap_co n fine  profile text as well<zyga -s u se>v er batim  as ita pp e a rsfo ryou 
< z yg a-sus e>I knowyou pasteb inn ed  it but if i t 's  in the sa metarball it's  mo re con ve nie n t
<zy ga- suse>  mvo:a fter t hat you c an experi m ent ina n yway,  change the kerne l  a s  jdstrand sugg este
< zy g a- s u se>  *s uggested,pe rhaps <mup> P R  s n a p d#4 0 57 closed: in terfaces: r e mov e dupl ic ate d  MockP lug/M oc k Slo t helpers f rominterface  tests <Create d  by sto lowski > < Clo sedb yst olo ws k i>< ht tps : //g ithub.co m/ sn apcor e/sn a p d / pull /40 57><mvo>  zyga-suse: o n t he w a y v ia ma il
<m vo>zy ga-su se: jd stran dgoing to the st able  kernel n owan d t ry ing i t  again 
<z yga -suse>thank y o u
< jd s t r an d> mvo: you said t hi s is  part of  sprea d .wh a t test?<p sto lows k i > zyg a-su s e,  I can m ake th e  M oc k* meth od  fromte sts  ca ll th e  one  frombuiltin,  so w e  get rid of du p licated body, al i tt l e wi n.. 
<mvo> jdst rand :  its  a n e wspr e ad te st I' mc ur r ently working on. w egot arepor t from CE QAabout this i s sue
<jds tran d >I  see a test fo r tha t file intests/ma in/sn ap-disca rd-ns, bu t that wou ldn 'tbecon f i ne d since calli n g  sna p- discard -ns  direct ly. ..<ps tol ow ski> butnot theot he rwa y a round <zyga-su se > p st olo wski: yeah,that' s go od 
< z yga -suse>p st o l owsk i:  l ittl e b ylittl e :) <mv o> jdst rand: and  we have  n otest ye t that checks  s nap refres hsta ble->e d g e and re vert back
<pstolowski>o k..
<mv o>jdstr and:  fwiw, st abl e kern els hows t he sam e mes sa ge< j dstra n d >mvo :how can Ir e pro duce? 
< jdst rand> m vo: do you have ab ran ch somewhere? 
<j dstr a n d>  mv o :w hat  i s  it t hat you are rev erting btw ?
<zyga-suse> I'll_have a_look
<zyga-suse> if you could,_save the_snap_confine_profile text_as_well
<zyga-suse> verbatim as_it appears for_you
<zyga-suse> I know you_pastebinned it but_if_it's in the same tarball it's more convenient
<zyga-suse> mvo: after that you can experiment_in_any way,_change_the_kernel as jdstrand suggeste
<zyga-suse> *suggested,_perhaps
<mup> PR snapd#4057 closed: interfaces:_remove duplicated_MockPlug/MockSlot helpers from interface tests <Created by stolowski>_<Closed_by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4057>
<mvo>_zyga-suse: on the way via mail
<mvo> zyga-suse: jdstrand going_to the stable kernel now and_trying it again
<zyga-suse>_thank_you
<jdstrand>_mvo: you said this_is part of spread. what test?
<pstolowski>_zyga-suse, I can make the Mock*_method from tests call the one from_builtin, so we get rid of_duplicated body, a little win..
<mvo>_jdstrand: its_a new spread test I'm_currently working on._we got_a report from_CE QA about this issue
<jdstrand> I_see a test_for that file in  tests/main/snap-discard-ns,_but_that wouldn't be_confined_since_calling snap-discard-ns_directly...
<pstolowski> but not_the_other way_around
<zyga-suse>_pstolowski: yeah, that's good
<zyga-suse> pstolowski: little_by_little :)
<mvo> jdstrand: and we have no_test yet that checks_snap_refresh stable->edge and revert_back
<pstolowski> ok..
<mvo> jdstrand: fwiw, stable_kernel shows the same message
<jdstrand> mvo:_how can_I reproduce?
<jdstrand>_mvo: do you have a branch somewhere?
<jdstrand> mvo: what is it_that you are reverting btw?
