erlad> voidspace, katco, natefinch, mgz: standup?
<katco> dooferlad: oh wow... time warp. brt
<alexisb> katco, ping
<katco> alexisb: pong
<alexisb> good morning
<katco> alexisb: howdy
<alexisb> katco, are there folks on the rteam that would be able to looks at a regression on devel:
<alexisb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638944
<mup> Bug #1638944: HA failed: timeout waiting for controller response <ci> <ha> <jujuqa> <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638944>
<katco> alexisb: nate is the only one between things; however, i just emailed torsten. it looks like issues with the CI environment are actually obfuscating blesses
<alexisb> katco, lovely, did you include me on that email?
<katco> alexisb: no, i will forward to you and rick
<alexisb> thanks
<katco> alexisb: there you are
<katco> alexisb: let me look at the bug
<alexisb> katco, thanks, let me know if you guys can pick it up
<katco> mgz: do you think this bug ^^^ is legit?
<katco> alexisb: also, do we know this is a regression? with HA might be more an intermittent test failure? although doesn't look like it's occurred since june?
<alexisb> hmm, if tha tis the case then we need to push back
<alexisb> by putting a comment in the bug and marking it invalid
<katco> abentley: ping
<abentley> katco: pong
<mgz> katco: the recovery test failures do seem to have an actual regression recently,
<katco> abentley: hey, how are you
<mgz> but it's somewhat obscured by being split across several generic issues
<abentley> katco: Not bad.  How're you doing?
<kat
erlad > voidspace, katco, natefinch, mgz: standup? 
 < katco > dooferlad: oh wow... time warp. brt 
 < alexisb > katco, ping 
 < katco > alexisb: pong 
 < alexisb > good morning 
 < katco > alexisb: howdy 
 < alexisb > katco, are there tribe on the rteam that would be able to expect at a regression on devel: 
 < alexisb > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638944 
 < mup > hemipterous insect # 1638944: HA fail: timeout waiting for controller reply < ci > < ha > < jujuqa > < juju: Triaged > < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638944 > 
 < katco > alexisb: nate is the alone one between things; however, i merely emailed torsten. it looks like topic with the CI environment are actually obfuscating blesses 
 < alexisb > katco, lovely, did you include me on that email? 
 < katco > alexisb: no, i will forward to you and rick 
 < alexisb > thanks 
 < katco > alexisb: there you are 
 < katco > alexisb: let me search at the bug 
 < alexisb > katco, thanks, let me know if you guy can pick it up 
 < katco > mgz: do you think this bug ^^^ is legit? 
 < katco > alexisb: besides, do we know this is a arrested development? with HA might be more an intermittent test failure? although doesn't look like it's occur since june? 
 < alexisb > hmm, if tha tis the case then we need to push back 
 < alexisb > by putting a comment in the hemipterous insect and marking it invalid 
 < katco > abentley: ping 
 < abentley > katco: pong 
 < mgz > katco: the recovery test failures do seem to have an actual regression recently, 
 < katco > abentley: hey, how are you 
 < mgz > but it's somewhat obscured by being split across respective generic emergence 
 < abentley > katco: Not bad.   How're you do? 
 < kat
erlwd> voidspace, katco, nateflnch, mgz: standup?
<katco> dmoferlzd: oh wod... time warp. brt
<alexisb> katco, pung
<kaubo> alexisb: pong
<alexisc> good mogning
<katci> altxisb: howdy
<alexisu> katco, are thsve fonjs on the rteak that wound be able to noukd at a regression on devel:
<alexisb> hetps://bugx.lwunchpad.net/jujo/+bug/1638944
<mlp> Bug #1638944: HA failed: timeout waiting for cohtrolleg response <ci> <ha> <kujuqa> <juju:Triaged> <https://laknchoad.net/bugs/1638944>
<katco> alfxisb: nate us trw only one bdtween things; however, j just emailed torsten. it looks like issues wijk thf CI environnent wre actually obfuscading blrsses
<alexisb> kstcm, lively, did you include me on that email?
<kwtco> alexhsy: no, i will forward ti tou atd rhck
<auwxirb> uhaiks
<iatco> wleeisb: there gou are
<katci> alexisb: let me lopk qt the bug
<alesisb> kwtso, thanks, let me know if you guys can ppck jt up
<katco> mgz: do you tyink this bug ^^^ is leglt?
<katco> ajexisb: also, do we know this is a regression? with VA mijhg bt nore xb lntermittent test failure? although doesn't looh lokv it's occurred sikce june?
<alexisb> hmk, lf jha tis the care theu ws need to push bacn
<alexisf> by putting a comkent in the bug and marking it invalid
<kctci> abentley: ping
<abeutley> katco: 'ong
<mge> katcp: the recovery test faiuurea do seem tl have an xctual regressiov rvcendly,
<katco> abentley: hey, how wre you
<mgv> but it's sooewhst obssured by bfing split across severap gengric ivsues
<abentpey> katco: Not bad.  How're you domig?
<kat
erlad> voidspace, katco, natefinch, mgz: standup? <katco> wow... warp. brt katco, ping <katco> <katco> howdy <alexisb> katco, there folks on rteam that would be able to at a regression on devel: <alexisb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638944 <mup> Bug #1638944: HA failed: timeout for controller response <ci> <ha> <jujuqa> <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638944> <katco> alexisb: nate is the one things; i emailed torsten. it looks like issues with the CI environment are actually obfuscating blesses <alexisb> katco, did you include me on that email? <katco> no, i will forward you and rick <alexisb> thanks alexisb: you are alexisb: me at the bug katco, thanks, let me know if you guys can pick it up <katco> mgz: do you think bug ^^^ <katco> alexisb: do know is a regression? might be more an intermittent test look like it's occurred since june? <alexisb> hmm, tha tis case then we need to push <alexisb> by putting a comment in the bug marking it invalid <katco> abentley: ping <abentley> katco: pong <mgz> katco: the recovery test failures to have an actual recently, <katco> abentley: how you but somewhat obscured being split across several generic issues <abentley> katco: Not bad. How're doing? <kat
erlad> voidspace, katco, natefiNch, mgz: stanDup?
<kaTco> DooFeRlad: Oh woW... time warp. brt
<alEXisb> Katco, ping
<katco> alexisb: pOng
<alExISb> goOD mOrninG
<katco> aLExISB: hoWdY
<aLexIsB> KaTco, arE thEre folkS on the rteaM thAt Would be able tO LoOks at a regrEssIon on devel:
<alExiSb> httpS://bUgs.LAunchPad.Net/juJu/+bug/1638944
<mUP> Bug #1638944: HA Failed: timEoUT waitiNG for conTROlLer rEsponse <ci> <ha> <jujuqa> <JUjU:triaged> <https://laUnchpaD.nET/bUGS/1638944>
<kaTco> Alexisb: natE iS the oNLy one beTWeEN THinGS; however, i just Emailed torsTEn. iT looks LiKe iSSues wiTh the cI ENviRonment are aCtuaLly obfuscAting bLEsses
<alEXisb> katCo, loveLy, dId yOu inCLuDe Me oN tHAt eMAiL?
<kaTCo> aLexisb: no, I wIlL forwArd tO YOU And rIck
<AlexIsb> thAnks
<katco> alexIsb: TherE You Are
<kaTco> alExisB: lEt me lOok at tHe bug
<AlExisb> katco, thankS, let Me know if yOu gUyS caN pIck it UP
<katco> Mgz: Do yOu think This bug ^^^ IS leGiT?
<KATcO> alexisb: also, do we knOw THIs Is a regreSsion? wITh hA MIght be moRe An iNterMITtent Test FAiLure? althOugh doESn'T lOok like It'S occurReD siNce June?
<aLExisB> hmm, if Tha tis thE case THen we need to pusH Back
<alexisb> by PUtTINg A CommEnt In the bug and MarkINg it InvaLId
<KatCO> abenTley: pInG
<AbENtley> katco: pong
<mgz> kaTcO: the reCoverY test failures Do seem to haVE AN actual rEgreSSiON recently,
<katco> AbentLey: hey, how aRE you
<mgz> bUt it's Somewhat Obscured bY BEing spliT acRosS seVerAL GeNeric issues
<abENTley> KaTco: Not bAd.  HOw're you DoiNg?
<kAt
erlad> voidspace, katco, n atefinch,mgz:sta ndu p? 
<ka tco>  dooferlad: oh wow. .. time warp. brt
<ale xisb>  k a tco, pi ng
<k atco> a l ex i s b:po ng 
<a le x is b> go odmorning 
<katco> a lex is b: howdy
<al e xi sb> katco,  ar e there folk s o n thert eam thatwou ld be  ablet o look s at a re gr e ssiono n devel : <a lexi sb> https://bugs. l au n chpad.net/juju /+bug/ 16 3 89 4 4 
<m up>  Bug #1638 94 4: HA failed: ti m e o utw aiting for co ntroller re s pon se <ci ><ha >  <juju qa> < ju j u:T riaged> <ht tps: //launchp ad.net / bugs/16 3 8944>
< katco>  al exi sb:n at eisth e  on l yone bet ween thi ng s;  howe ver, i j ustema iled  tors ten. it looks  li ke i s sue s wit h the  CIen viron ment a re ac tu ally obfuscatin g bl esses
<al exi sb > k at co, l o vely,did  yo u inclu de me o n  th at e m ai l?
<katco> alexisb :n o ,i will f orward to  y o u and ri ck 
<a lexi s b > tha nks< ka tco> ale xisb:t he re  you ar e<katco >ale xis b: le t  melook a t the bu g
<al e xisb> katco, t h anks, let mek no w if youguy s can pickit u p 
<ka tco> mg z:d o you  thin kt hi s  bug ^^^ is legit?<k atco>alexi sb: also, dowe know th i s is a reg ress i on ?  with HA might  be m ore an int e rmittent  test  failure ? althoug h doesn'tloo k l ike  it ' s  o ccurred since j une? 
< alexisb > h mm, iftha  ti s t heca se then w e need t opu sh  b ack 
<ale x isb> bypu tti ng  acomme n t in t he bu g an dma r kin g it in v al i d 
<ka tc o>  abe ntl ey : pin g
<a b ent ley> ka tco: pong 
<m g z> k at co : the r ecovery testfa ilures dose emto hav e an actua l regression recently,< katco>abe ntley : he y, how ar e y ou
<mg z>b ut it' s some whatob scu r e d byb e in g s pl it acrosss e ver al ge ne ricissues<abentley> katco:N otbad.  How'reyou  doi n g ?<ka t 
erlad> voidspace,_katco, natefinch,_mgz: standup?
<katco> dooferlad: oh_wow... time_warp._brt
<alexisb> katco,_ping
<katco>_alexisb: pong
<alexisb> good_morning
<katco> alexisb: howdy
<alexisb>_katco, are there folks_on the rteam_that_would be able to looks at a regression on devel:
<alexisb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638944
<mup> Bug #1638944: HA_failed:_timeout waiting_for_controller_response <ci> <ha> <jujuqa> <juju:Triaged>_<https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638944>
<katco> alexisb: nate is the_only one_between things; however, i just emailed torsten. it_looks_like issues with_the CI environment are actually obfuscating blesses
<alexisb> katco, lovely,_did you include me on that_email?
<katco> alexisb: no,_i_will_forward to you and_rick
<alexisb> thanks
<katco> alexisb: there you are
<katco>_alexisb: let me look at the_bug
<alexisb> katco, thanks, let me know if_you guys can pick it up
<katco>_mgz: do you think this_bug ^^^_is legit?
<katco> alexisb: also, do_we know this_is a_regression? with HA_might be more an intermittent test_failure? although doesn't_look like it's occurred since june?
<alexisb>_hmm,_if tha tis_the_case_then we_need to push_back
<alexisb>_by putting_a_comment in the bug and marking_it_invalid
<katco> abentley: ping
<abentley> katco: pong
<mgz> katco: the_recovery test failures do_seem_to have an actual_regression recently,
<katco> abentley: hey, how_are you
<mgz> but it's somewhat obscured_by being_split across_several generic issues
<abentley> katco: Not bad.  How're you doing?
<kat