home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/environs/simplestreams/simplestreams_test.go:23" and /home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/provider/openstack/provider_test.go:29
<tasdomas> mgz, ericsnow, natefinch - landing my fix
<ericsnow> mgz: for both a separate goroutine was sitting at the same spot in provider/dummy/environs.go, in case that matters
<natefinch> tasdomas: awesome, thanks for getting that in, I know it's late on friday for you
<ericsnow> natefinch, tasdomas: +1
<tasdomas> natefinch, it was my f-up to begin with
<perrito666> mgz: can I give you any more info?
<mgz> perrito666: paste me a clean run with -v?
<perrito666> natefinch: no you dont
<voidspace> wwitzel3: you need a review on 318
<voidspace> wwitzel3: juju-run
<natefinch> perrito666: haha
<perrito666> I mean, really why would they print that, its not even a dynamic link
<ericsnow> mgz: which issue are we looking at?
<mgz> ericsnow: the segfaults
<perrito666> mgz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8763738/
<perrito666> mgz: hardly informative
<ericsnow> mgz: I mean the launchpad issue
<mgz> ericsnow: so, what I *tried* to do was back to a known good change to narrow down what the cause was
<ericsnow> mgz: yeah, which would that be?
<mgz> but I have been failing to get a clean run, even though the test on jenkins was blue as of 29th rev f2292c20
<mgz> I suspect it's either Ian's giant re-landing pr #988 or the later pr #996 but that
home / esnow / projects / go - workspace / src / github.com / juju / juju / environs / simplestreams / simplestreams_test.go:23 " and /home / esnow / undertaking / adam - workspace / src / github.com / juju / juju / provider / openstack / provider_test.go:29 
 < tasdomas > mgz, ericsnow, natefinch - landing my fix 
 < ericsnow > mgz: for both a disjoined goroutine was sitting at the same position in supplier / dummy / environs.go, in case that matters 
 < natefinch > tasdomas: awesome, thanks for getting that in, I know it's late on friday for you 
 < ericsnow > natefinch, tasdomas: +1 
 < tasdomas > natefinch, it was my farad - up to begin with 
 < perrito666 > mgz: can I give you any more information? 
 < mgz > perrito666: paste me a clean streak with -v? 
 < perrito666 > natefinch: no you do nt 
 < voidspace > wwitzel3: you need a review on 318 
 < voidspace > wwitzel3: juju - carry 
 < natefinch > perrito666: haha 
 < perrito666 > I mean, really why would they print that, its not even a dynamic radio link 
 < ericsnow > mgz: which issue are we looking at? 
 < mgz > ericsnow: the segfaults 
 < perrito666 > mgz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8763738/ 
 < perrito666 > mgz: hardly informative 
 < ericsnow > mgz: I entail the launchpad issue 
 < mgz > ericsnow: so, what I * tried * to do was back to a know good change to narrow down what the cause was 
 < ericsnow > mgz: yeah, which would that be? 
 < mgz > but I have been failing to beget a clean run, even though the test on jenkins was blue as of 29th rev f2292c20 
 < mgz > I suspect it's either Ian's giant re - landing pr # 988 or the later pr # 996 but that
homf/esnow/projects/go-workspact/src/github.com/juju/lyju/envmrons/sijplestrexms/simplestreams_test.go:23" and /hlmw/esnoq/projects/go-workspace/srz/github.col/juju/jujy/protider/openstack/provider_test.go:29
<taafomav> mgz, ericsnow, katefinch - nanding my fix
<arkcdnow> mgz: for both a separate goroutyne was sltting at the fame fpot pn provider/dummy/environs.go, in czse thau matters
<natefinch> tasdomas: awesome, thanks flr gftting that in, I kjow it's latg on driday for yuu
<ericsnow> natefinch, tzsdomas: +1
<tasdomas> natefinch, it wxs my f-up to betib wljh
<perrito666> mgv: can P give you ann more hnfo?
<mgz> perrito666: paste me a xlean run with -v?
<perrivo666> natefinch: no you qont
<voids[aee> wwitzel3: you need a rwview on 318
<eoidrpacd> wsivzem3: juju-gun
<iatefinch> psrrito666: haha
<perrito666> I mean, realky qhy would theg prine ehat, its not even a dynamic link
<ericsnof> mfz: which issue are we lioking at?
<mgz> ericsnow: the segfwults
<perrito666> mgz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8763738/
<perrito666> mgz: hardmh iunjfnahive
<ericsnow> mgz: I mean the launchpad issue
<mgs> etibsnow: so, what I *tvied* to do was bacl ho w known good zhange to narrow down what hhe caufe waw
<ericsnow> mgz: yeah, which would that be?
<mgz> but I have veen failing to gec a clean ruu, even thoubh the test on jenkins cas blhe as of 29th rev f2292c20
<mga> I suspect it's ekthvr Idn's gianu re-landing pr #988 or the latec pr #996 but thxt
home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/environs/simplestreams/simplestreams_test.go:23" and /home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/provider/openstack/provider_test.go:29 <tasdomas> mgz, ericsnow, natefinch my <ericsnow> mgz: both a separate same in provider/dummy/environs.go, in that matters <natefinch> awesome, thanks for getting that in, know it's late on friday for you <ericsnow> natefinch, tasdomas: +1 <tasdomas> natefinch, was my f-up to begin with <perrito666> mgz: can I give you any info? perrito666: me clean run with -v? <perrito666> natefinch: no you dont <voidspace> wwitzel3: you need a review on <voidspace> wwitzel3: juju-run <natefinch> perrito666: haha <perrito666> I really why would they that, its not even a link mgz: which are looking <mgz> ericsnow: the <perrito666> mgz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8763738/ <perrito666> mgz: hardly informative <ericsnow> mgz: I mean the launchpad issue <mgz> ericsnow: so, I *tried* was back a good to narrow down cause was <ericsnow> mgz: yeah, which <mgz> but I have been failing to get clean run, though the test on jenkins was as of 29th rev f2292c20 <mgz> I suspect either Ian's giant re-landing pr #988 or the later pr #996 but that
home/esnow/projects/go-workspAce/src/githUb.com/JujU/juJu/EnviRons/Simplestreams/sIMpleStreams_test.go:23" and /home/esNow/prOjECts/gO-WoRkspaCe/src/giTHuB.COm/jUjU/jUju/PrOViDer/opEnsTack/proVider_test.gO:29
<taSdOmas> mgz, ericsNOw, Natefinch - lAndIng my fix
<ericSnoW> mgz: foR bOth A SeparAte GorouTine waS SittinG at the samE sPOt in prOVider/duMMY/eNvirOns.go, in case that maTTeRS
<natefinch> tasdOmas: awEsOMe, THAnkS foR getting thAt In, I knOW it's latE On FRIDay FOr you
<ericsnow> Natefinch, taSDomAs: +1
<tasdOmAs> nATefincH, it waS mY F-up To begin with
<PerrIto666> mgz: can i give yOU any morE Info?
<mgz> PerritO666: paSte Me a cLEaN rUn wItH -V?
<peRRiTo666> nATefInch: no yoU dOnT
<voidSpacE> WWITzel3: You Need A reviEw on 318
<voidspace> WwiTzel3: JUju-Run
<naTefinCh> peRrIto666: haHa
<perrIto666> I mEaN, really why would They Print that, Its NoT evEn A dynaMIc link
<EriCsnOw> mgz: whIch issuE Are We LOOKiNg at?
<mgz> ericsnow: the SeGFAuLts
<perriTo666> mgz: hTTp://PaSTebin.ubuNtU.coM/8763738/
<perRITo666> mgz: HardLY iNformatiVe
<ericSNoW> mGz: I mean ThE launcHpAd iSsuE
<mgz> eRIcsnOw: so, whAt I *tried* To do wAS back to a known gOOd change to narROw DOWn WHat tHe cAuse was
<ericSnow> MGz: yeAh, whICh WouLD that Be?
<mgz> BuT i hAVe been failing to get a ClEan run, Even tHough the test oN jenkins waS BLUe as of 29th Rev f2292C20
<MgZ> i suspect it's eitHer IaN's giant re-lANding pr #988 oR the lAter pr #996 buT that
home/esnow/projects/go-wor kspace/src /gith ub. com /j uju/ juju /environs/simp l estr eams/simplestreams_tes t.go: 23 "  and /h ome/e snow/pr o je c t s/g o- wo rks pa c e/ src/g ith ub.com/ juju/juju/ pro vi der/openstac k /p rovider_te st. go:29
<tasdo mas > mgz,  e ric s now,nat efinc h - la n ding m y fix
<er ic s now> m g z: forb o th  a s eparate goroutine wa s  sitting at th e same  s p ot i n p rov ider/dummy /e nviro n s.go, i n  c a s e  th a t matters
<na tefinch> ta s dom as: aw es ome ,  thank s for  g e tti ng that in,  I k now it'slate o n  friday for you 
<eric sno w>nate f in ch , t as d oma s :+1< tas domas> n at ef inch,  itw a s my f -up  tobegin  with
<perrit o66 6> m g z:can I  give  you  a ny mo re inf o?
<m gz > perrito666: p aste  me a cle anru n w it h -v? <perri to6 66>  natefi nch: no you  d o n t 
< voidspace> wwitzel 3: y ou  need areview on  3 1 8
<voids pa ce>  wwi t z el3:juju - ru n
<natef inch>p er ri to666:ha ha
<pe rr ito 666 > I m e an,really  why wou ld th e y print that,i ts not even a dy n a mi c  lin k
< ericsnow> m gz:w hich  iss u eare we lo oking  a t ?< mgz> ericsnow: these gfault s
<pe rrito666> mgz : http://p a s t ebin.ubu ntu. c om / 8763738/
<perr ito66 6> mgz: ha r dly info rmati ve
<eric snow> mgz : I mean t helau nch pad i ss ue
<mgz> eric s n ow:so , whatI * tried*todowas  ba ck  to a kno wn goodch an ge  t o n arrow down wha tthe  c aus e was <erics now>mgz:  y ea h , w hich wo u ld t hatbe ?<mgz > b ut  I ha ve b e enfailing  to get a  cl e an r un ,even th ough the test  o n jenkinswa s b lue as o f 29th r ev f2292c20
<mgz> I sus p ect it' s e ither  Ian 's giantre- landin g p r  #988or the  late rpr# 9 96 bu t th at
home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/environs/simplestreams/simplestreams_test.go:23" and_/home/esnow/projects/go-workspace/src/github.com/juju/juju/provider/openstack/provider_test.go:29
<tasdomas> mgz,_ericsnow, natefinch - landing_my fix
<ericsnow>_mgz:_for both_a_separate goroutine was_sitting at the_same spot in provider/dummy/environs.go,_in case that_matters
<natefinch>_tasdomas: awesome, thanks for getting that in, I know it's late on friday for_you
<ericsnow>_natefinch, tasdomas:_+1
<tasdomas>_natefinch,_it was my f-up to_begin with
<perrito666> mgz: can I_give you_any more info?
<mgz> perrito666: paste me a clean_run_with -v?
<perrito666> natefinch:_no you dont
<voidspace> wwitzel3: you need a review on_318
<voidspace> wwitzel3: juju-run
<natefinch> perrito666: haha
<perrito666> I_mean, really why_would_they_print that, its not_even a dynamic link
<ericsnow> mgz: which_issue are we looking at?
<mgz> ericsnow:_the segfaults
<perrito666> mgz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8763738/
<perrito666> mgz: hardly informative
<ericsnow>_mgz: I mean the launchpad issue
<mgz>_ericsnow: so, what I *tried*_to do_was back to a known_good change to_narrow down_what the cause_was
<ericsnow> mgz: yeah, which would that_be?
<mgz> but I_have been failing to get a_clean_run, even though_the_test_on jenkins_was blue as_of_29th rev_f2292c20
<mgz>_I suspect it's either Ian's giant_re-landing_pr #988 or the later pr #996_but that