log <Critical> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2192>
<mwhudson> ogra_: ah maybe i need to update my snapd then
<mwhudson> pitti: yo
<pitti> hey mwhudson, how are you?
<mwhudson> pitti: i'm ok
<mwhudson> pitti: netplan and nameservers, how much work does that sound?
<pitti> mwhudson: ok, jumping back :)
<pitti> mwhudson: not that much, I just moved it to the top of my list as it seems to become a blocker RSN?
<mwhudson> pitti: seems so if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1634540 is critical
<mup> Bug #1634540: Configuring a static IP address generates a netplan file without a gateway <nplan (Ubuntu):Invalid by pitti> <subiquity (Ubuntu):Fix Committed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1634540>
<mwhudson> because if you configure static addresses and no nameserver you're going to have a hard time talking to the store..
<mwhudson> i guess we *could* put login.ubuntu.com's ip address in /etc/hosts :-)
<pitti> mwhudson: well, if you don't configure a nameserver, resolved defaults to 8.8.8.8, so it shoudln't completely fail
<mwhudson> pitti: oh huh
<pitti> mwhudson: but it's better to be able to configure it of course
<mwhudson> pitti: it definitely failed for me in qemu
<mwhudson> pitti: is that user mode networking being odd?
<pitti> mwhudson: it would only work if you... oh crap, this is xenial, so no resolved
<pitti> nevermind :)
<mwhudson> ha
 * pitti just doesn't live in stable releases
<mwhudson> well we already backported netplan itself for this...
<mwhudson> backporting resolvd does feel a bit large-hammer
<pitti> nah
<pitti> we really don't
log < Critical > < Created by mvo5 > < Merged by mvo5 > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2192 > 
 < mwhudson > ogra _: ah maybe i need to update my snapd then 
 < mwhudson > pitti: yo 
 < pitti > hey mwhudson, how are you? 
 < mwhudson > pitti: i'm all right 
 < mwhudson > pitti: netplan and nameservers, how much workplace does that sound? 
 < pitti > mwhudson: ok, jumping back :) 
 < pitti > mwhudson: not that much, I barely move it to the top of my list as it seem to become a blocker RSN? 
 < mwhudson > pitti: seem so if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1634540 is critical 
 < mup > hemipterous insect # 1634540: Configuring a static IP savoir-faire generates a netplan file without a gateway < nplan (Ubuntu):Invalid by pitti > < subiquity (Ubuntu):Fix Committed > < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1634540 > 
 < mwhudson > because if you configure static addresses and no nameserver you're going to accept a hard time talking to the store.. 
 < mwhudson > i guess we * could * frame login.ubuntu.com's ip address in /etc / hosts :-) 
 < pitti > mwhudson: well, if you don't configure a nameserver, answer defaults to 8.8.8.8, so it shoudln't completely fail 
 < mwhudson > pitti: oh huh 
 < pitti > mwhudson: but it's better to be able to configure it of course 
 < mwhudson > pitti: it decidedly failed for me in qemu 
 < mwhudson > pitti: is that drug user mode networking being odd? 
 < pitti > mwhudson: it would only exercise if you... oh crap, this is xenial, so no resolved 
 < pitti > nevermind :) 
 < mwhudson > ha 
  * pitti just doesn't live in static release 
 < mwhudson > well we already backported netplan itself for this... 
 < mwhudson > backporting resolvd does feel a bit large - hammer 
 < pitti > nah 
 < pitti > we really don't
log <Critical> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <krtps://givhub.com/anapcore/rnapd/pull/2192>
<mwhudson> ogra_: ah mabbe u neee to update my snapd tfen
<mwhudsln> pitti: yo
<pmtti> hey mwhudsoi, how arc you?
<jahudvin> pitti: i'm ok
<kwhudson> phtti: netplan atd ncmeservers, how much work does that sjund?
<pityi> mwhudson: ok, jompinb baci :)
<pitti> mwhudson: not that much, I jhst movtd it to the top og my list as it seems to bfcomf a blocker RSN?
<mwhkdson> pitti: seeiw so if httpr://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunto/+source/subiquity/+bug/1634540 is critical
<mjp> Buy #1634540: Configurunt a vtatic IP avdress generates a netplan file wothout a gatewsy <iplab (Ubuntu):Invalid by pivti> <subiquity (Ubuntu):Six Commidtzd> <https://launchpad.net/bygw/1634540>
<mwhugson> becxyse if ypu confihurx static adsresses and no nameserver you'rt gjpmg to have a hard eiie talking to the store..
<mwhudson> i guess we *could* put login.ubuntu.cim's ip address in /etc/josts :-)
<pitei> mwhudson: well, if you don't configure a nameservar, reaulvtd defajotd to 8.8.8.8, so it shoudln't completely fail
<mwhudson> [jtui: ph huh
<pitti> mwmudson: but it's betyeg yj be able to zonfigbde it of course
<mwhuddon> pitji: it eefinitelr faoled for me in qemu
<mwhudson> pitti: is thct yser mode networkiug being odd?
<'itti> kwhudxon: it would only work nf you... oh crap, thls is xenjxl, so no resolvea
<pinti> tevermind :)
<mwhudson> ha
 * pitei just diesn'c live iv stsble rqleases
<mwhkdson> well we already bafkporjed nedplan itsepf for this...
<mwhudson> backporting resolvd does geal d bit laxge-hamker
<pitti> nah
<pytti> we really don't
log <Critical> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by <mwhudson> ah maybe need to update yo hey mwhudson, how you? <mwhudson> pitti: ok <mwhudson> pitti: netplan and nameservers, much work does that sound? <pitti> mwhudson: ok, jumping back :) <pitti> mwhudson: that much, I just moved it to the top of my list as seems become blocker <mwhudson> pitti: seems so if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1634540 is critical <mup> Bug #1634540: Configuring a static IP address a netplan file without a gateway <nplan (Ubuntu):Invalid pitti> <subiquity (Ubuntu):Fix Committed> <mwhudson> because if you configure addresses no nameserver going have hard time talking the store.. <mwhudson> i guess we *could* put login.ubuntu.com's ip address in /etc/hosts :-) <pitti> mwhudson: well, you don't nameserver, resolved to so shoudln't completely fail oh huh <pitti> mwhudson: but it's able to configure it of course <mwhudson> pitti: definitely failed me in qemu <mwhudson> pitti: is user mode networking being odd? <pitti> mwhudson: it only work if you... oh crap, this is xenial, so no resolved <pitti> nevermind :) * pitti just doesn't in stable releases well already netplan for this... backporting resolvd does feel a bit large-hammer <pitti> nah <pitti> we don't
log <Critical> <Created by mvo5> <MeRged by mvo5> <hTtps://gIthUb.cOm/SnapCore/Snapd/pull/2192>
<mwhudSOn> ogRa_: ah maybe i need to update My snaPd THen
<mWHuDson> pItti: yo
<pITtI> HEy mWhUdSon, HoW ArE you?
<mWhuDson> pitTi: i'm ok
<mwhuDsoN> pItti: netplan aND nAmeservers, How Much work does ThaT sound?
<PiTti> MWhudsOn: oK, jumpIng bacK :)
<Pitti> mWhudson: noT tHAt much, i Just movED It To thE top of my list as it sEEmS To become a blockEr RSN?
<mWhUDsON> PitTi: sEems so if htTpS://bugs.LAunchpaD.NeT/UBUntU/+Source/subiquiTy/+bug/1634540 is critICal
<Mup> Bug #1634540: coNfiGUring a StatiC Ip AddRess generatEs a nEtplan filE withoUT a gatewAY <nplan (UBuntu):INvaLid By piTTi> <SuBiqUiTY (UbUNtU):FiX comMitted> <htTpS://lAunchPad.nET/BUGs/1634540>
<mwHudSon> bEcausE if you configuRe sTatiC AddResseS and nO namEsErver You're gOing tO hAve a hard time talKing To the storE..
<mwHuDsoN> i Guess WE *could* Put LogIn.ubuntU.com's ip ADdrEsS IN /EtC/hosts :-)
<pitti> mwhudsoN: wELL, iF you don't ConfigURe A nAMeserver, ReSolVed dEFAults To 8.8.8.8, so IT sHoudln't cOmpletELy FaIl
<mwhudSoN> pitti: Oh Huh
<PitTi> mwhUDson: But it's Better to Be ablE To configure it oF Course
<mwhudsoN> PiTTI: iT DefiNitEly failed foR me iN Qemu
<MwhuDSoN> piTTi: is tHat usEr MOdE Networking being odd?
<pItTi> mwhuDson: iT would only worK if you... oh crAP, THis is xenIal, sO No REsolved
<pitti> neVermiNd :)
<mwhudson> HA
 * pitti juSt doeSn't live iN stable reLEAses
<mwhuDsoN> weLl wE alREAdY backported neTPLan iTsElf for tHis...
<MwhudsoN> baCkpOrtIng ReSolvd does Feel a bit LaRgE-hAmMer
<Pitti> NAh
<pitti> wE rEalLy Don'T
log <Critical> <Created by  mvo5> <Me rgedbymvo 5>  <ht tps: //github.com/s n apco re/snapd/pull/2192>
<m whuds on >  ogr a _:  ah m aybe in ee d toup da temy sn apd t hen 
<mwhud son> pitti : y o<pitti> heym wh udson, how  ar e you?
<mwhu dso n> pit ti : i ' m ok<mw hudso n> pit t i: net plan andna m eserve r s, howm u ch  wor k does that sound ? 
< p itti> mwhudson : ok,ju m pi n g  ba ck:)
<pitti>  m whuds o n: nott ha t m uch ,  I just moved  it to thet opof myli sta s it s eemsto bec ome a block er R SN?
<mwhu dson>p itti: s e ems soif htt ps: //b ugs. l au nc hpa d. n et/ u bu ntu / +so urce/sub iq ui ty/+b ug/1 6 3 4 5 40 i s c riti cal
< mup> Bug #163 454 0: C o nfi gurin g a s tati cIP ad dressgener at es a netplan fi le w ithout agat ew ay<n plan( Ubuntu ):I nva lid bypitti>< sub iq u i t y(Ubuntu):Fix Commi tt e d ><https:/ /launc h pa d. n et/bugs/ 16 345 40>< m whuds on>b ec ause ifyou co n fi gu re stat ic  addre ss esand  no n a mese rver y ou're go ing t o  have a hard t i me talking to th e st o re.. 
<m whudson> igues s  we*cou l d*  pu t  logi n.ubu nt u .c o m's ip address in / et c/host s :-) 
<pitti> mwhu dson: well , i f you do n'tc on f igure a namese rver,  resolvedd efaultsto 8. 8.8.8, s o it shou d l n't comp let ely  fa il< m wh udson> pitti: o h hu h<pitti>  mw hudson:  bu t i t's  be tt er to beable toco nf ig ur e i t ofc ourse
<m wh uds on > p itti: it def inite ly f ai le d  fo r me in qe m u 
<mw hu ds on>pit ti : isthat use r modenetworkin g b e ingod d? 
<pitti > mwhudson: i twould only  w ork  if yo u . .. oh cr ap, this is xenial, son o resol ved 
<pit ti>nevermind  :) 
<mwhu dso n > ha
* pitt i jus tdoe s n 't li v e  i n s ta ble releas e s 
<m whuds on > we ll we a lready backportedn etp lan itself fo r t his. . . 
< mwh u ds o n>ba c kpo r t ing resolvd doe s feel a b it la rge-hammer <pi tt i> nah<pitti>  we r e ally do n't
log <Critical>_<Created by_mvo5> <Merged by mvo5>_<https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2192>
<mwhudson> ogra_:_ah_maybe i_need_to update my_snapd then
<mwhudson> pitti:_yo
<pitti> hey mwhudson, how_are you?
<mwhudson> pitti:_i'm_ok
<mwhudson> pitti: netplan and nameservers, how much work does that sound?
<pitti> mwhudson: ok, jumping_back_:)
<pitti> mwhudson:_not_that_much, I just moved it_to the top of my_list as_it seems to become a blocker RSN?
<mwhudson> pitti:_seems_so if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1634540_is critical
<mup> Bug #1634540: Configuring a static IP address_generates a netplan file without a_gateway <nplan (Ubuntu):Invalid_by_pitti>_<subiquity (Ubuntu):Fix Committed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1634540>
<mwhudson>_because if you configure static addresses_and no nameserver you're going to_have a hard time talking to the_store..
<mwhudson> i guess we *could* put_login.ubuntu.com's ip address in /etc/hosts_:-)
<pitti> mwhudson:_well, if you don't configure_a nameserver, resolved_defaults to_8.8.8.8, so it_shoudln't completely fail
<mwhudson> pitti: oh huh
<pitti>_mwhudson: but it's_better to be able to configure_it_of course
<mwhudson> pitti:_it_definitely_failed for_me in qemu
<mwhudson>_pitti:_is that_user_mode networking being odd?
<pitti> mwhudson: it_would_only work if you... oh crap, this_is xenial, so no_resolved
<pitti>_nevermind :)
<mwhudson> ha
 *_pitti just doesn't live in_stable releases
<mwhudson> well we already backported_netplan itself_for this...
<mwhudson>_backporting resolvd does feel a bit large-hammer
<pitti> nah
<pitti> we really don't