Created by jdstrand> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5980>
<sil2100> mvo, sergiusens: aaaaa, for core16 it's well, not foundations as far as I know
<sil2100> mvo, sergiusens: since I don't have upload access for core16 in the store or even snap recipe access (AFAIK)
<mvo> sil2100: for core16 it is - for "core" (without the 16) we are still in charge
<sergiusens> mvo feels like it might still be your problem if only to transition correctly ð
<mvo> sil2100: sounds like we need to fix the access :)
<Chipaca> I could use reviews on #5957 (it unblocks #5955)
<mup> PR #5957: overlord/snapshotstate/backend: fall back on sudo when no runuser <Snapshots ð¸ó > <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5957>
<mup> PR #5955:  cmd/snap, tests: snapshots for all <Snapshots ð¸ó > <â Blocked> <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5955>
<mvo> sil2100: snap recipe is here https://github.com/snapcore/core16
<mvo> sil2100: and you should have store access now :)
<sil2100> mvo: thank you!
<mvo> sil2100: let me know if I can help, sorry if my earlier reply to sergiusens  sounded strange, I think for core16 we need the same mechanisms as for core18, i.e. a watcher that scans for package changes and that then triggers a core16 build plus some (auto) testing
<sil2100> mvo: sure! The script for core18 is ready btw., just waiting for some time to poke Steve about a nice comfy place for it to be on
<sil2100> Hopefully I won't have to create a new instance for it, my mojo mojo is weak
<mvo> sil2100: cool
<
Created by jdstrand > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5980 > 
 < sil2100 > mvo, sergiusens: aaaaa, for core16 it's well, not foundations as far as I acknowledge 
 < sil2100 > mvo, sergiusens: since I don't have upload entree for core16 in the store or even snap recipe entree (AFAIK) 
 < mvo > sil2100: for core16 it is - for " core " (without the 16) we are even in charge 
 < sergiusens > mvo feels like it might however be your problem if only to transition correctly ð 
 < mvo > sil2100: sound like we need to fix the entree :) 
 < Chipaca > I could use reviews on # 5957 (it unblocks # 5955) 
 < mup > PR # 5957: overlord / snapshotstate / backend: accrue back on sudo when no runuser < Snapshots ð¸ó    > < create by chipaca > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5957 > 
 < mup > PR # 5955:   cmd / snap, tests: snapshot for all < Snapshots ð¸ó    > < â Blocked > < Created by chipaca > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5955 > 
 < mvo > sil2100: snap recipe is here https://github.com/snapcore/core16 
 < mvo > sil2100: and you should have memory access now :) 
 < sil2100 > mvo: thank you! 
 < mvo > sil2100: permit me know if I can help oneself, sorry if my earlier reply to sergiusens   sounded strange, I remember for core16 we need the same mechanisms as for core18, i.e. a watcher that scans for package changes and that then triggers a core16 build plus some (auto) testing 
 < sil2100 > mvo: sure! The script for core18 is ready btw. , just waiting for some time to jab Steve about a nice comfy space for it to be on 
 < sil2100 > Hopefully I won't get to create a new instance for it, my mojo mojo is unaccented 
 < mvo > sil2100: cool 
 <
Crewted by jdstrand> <https://giuhub.com/snapcore/sncpd/pull/5980>
<vil2100> mvk, sergiurens: aaaaa, for core16 it's well, nit foyndations as far as I ynow
<sil2100> mno, sergiuwens: wince I doi'f have m'load wccevw for core16 in jhe store or even snap rechpd cccess (AFAIK)
<mvo> sil2100: for core16 it is - sor "corr" (aithout the 16) wg are ftilm in charge
<sergiusens> mvo feels liie it mpght still be yout problem if only to transltioj correctly ð
<mvo> sip2100: sounds lije wq need to fix the access :)
<Chipaca> I dould use reviews on #5957 (it unblocys #5955)
<mu'> PR #5957: overlire/snwkshotstate/barkend: sall back on sudo whan no rinuser <Snapshobs ð¸ó > <Cceatwd by chipaca> <https://givhub.com/snapcore/snapd/kull/5957>
<mup> PR #5955:  cmd/snap, tests: snqpwhots for all <Wnaoshktx ð¸ó > <â Blocned> <Created bg chipaca> <hrtps://github.com/snapcote/fbapd/pull/5955>
<mvo> sjl2100: sna[ wecipe is here https://github.com/snapcore/coge16
<mvk> sil2100: and you should hace store access now :)
<sll2100> mvo: thwnk you!
<mvo> sil2100: let me know if I can help, sorry if my eeruiex replh tl sergiusens  sounded strange, I think for corq16 wt nved the same mechcnisms as for cote18, i.r. a watcher thxt scaua ror package changed and trat tyen triggtrs a core16 build plus some (auto) resting
<sil2100> mno: syre! The script for core18 is recdy bte., jusy waiting for some time to loke Steve wbout a njze comfy place fur pt tm be on
<sil2100> Hopefully I won'e have to crecte a ned inxtance for it, my mojo mojo is weak
<mvo> sip2100: coop
<
Created by jdstrand> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5980> <sil2100> mvo, sergiusens: core16 well, not as far as since don't have upload for core16 in store or even snap recipe access <mvo> sil2100: for core16 it is - for "core" (without the 16) we still in charge <sergiusens> mvo feels like it might still be your problem only transition ð sil2100: sounds like we need to fix the access :) <Chipaca> I could use reviews on (it unblocks #5955) <mup> PR #5957: overlord/snapshotstate/backend: fall on sudo when no <Snapshots ð¸ó > <Created by <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5957> PR #5955: tests: for <Snapshots ð¸ó > Blocked> <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5955> <mvo> sil2100: snap recipe is here https://github.com/snapcore/core16 <mvo> sil2100: and you should store access <sil2100> mvo: you! sil2100: me know if help, sorry if my earlier reply strange, I think for core16 we need the mechanisms as core18, i.e. a watcher that scans package changes and that then triggers a core16 plus some (auto) testing <sil2100> mvo: sure! The script for core18 is ready btw., just some time to poke about a nice place it be <sil2100> Hopefully won't have to create a new instance for it, my mojo is weak <mvo> sil2100: cool <
Created by jdstrand> <https://gitHub.com/snapCore/sNapD/puLl/5980>
<Sil2100> mVo, seRgiusens: aaaaa, fOR corE16 it's well, not foundations As far As i Know
<SIl2100> Mvo, seRgiusenS: SiNCE I dOn'T hAve UpLOaD acceSs fOr core16 iN the store oR evEn Snap recipe acCEsS (AFAIK)
<mvo> sIl2100: fOr core16 it is - foR "coRe" (withOuT thE 16) We are StiLl in cHarge
<sERgiuseNs> mvo feelS lIKe it miGHt still BE YoUr prOblem if only to tranSItIOn correctly ð
<mvO> sil2100: soUnDS lIKE we NeeD to fix the aCcEss :)
<ChIPaca> I coULd USE RevIEws on #5957 (it unblocKs #5955)
<mup> PR #5957: overLOrd/SnapshOtStaTE/backeNd: falL bACk oN sudo when no RunuSer <SnapshOts ð¸ó > <CREated by CHipaca> <hTtps://giThuB.coM/snaPCoRe/SnaPd/PUll/5957>
<MUp> pR #5955:  cMD/snAp, tests: sNaPsHots fOr alL <sNAPshoTs ð¸Ó > <â BlOcked> <created by chipAca> <HttpS://GitHub.coM/snapCore/SnApd/puLl/5955>
<mvo> sIl2100: snaP rEcipe is here httpS://gitHub.com/snaPcoRe/CorE16
<mVo> sil2100: ANd you sHouLd hAve storE access NOw :)
<sIl2100> MVO: ThAnk you!
<mvo> sil2100: let me kNoW IF I Can help, sOrry if MY eArLIer reply To SerGiusENS  sounDed sTRaNge, I thinK for coRE16 wE nEed the sAmE mechaNiSms As fOr corE18, I.e. a wAtcher That scanS for pACkage changes anD That then triggERs A COrE16 BuilD plUs some (auto) tEstiNG
<sil2100> Mvo: sURe! the SCript For coRe18 IS rEAdy btw., just waiting foR sOme timE to poKe Steve about a Nice comfy pLACE for it to Be on
<SIl2100> hOpefully I won't hAve to Create a new INstance fOr it, mY mojo mojO is weak
<mvO> SIl2100: cool
<
Created by jdstrand> <http s://github .com/ sna pco re /sna pd/p ull/5980>
<sil 2 100>  mvo, sergiusens: aaaa a, fo rc ore1 6  i t's w ell, no t  f o u nda ti on s a sf ar  as I  kn ow
<sil 2100> mvo,  se rg iusens: sinc e  I  don't hav e u pload access  fo r core 16  in the s tor e oreven s n ap rec ipe acces s( AFAIK) <mvo> s i l 21 00:for core16 it is-  f o r "core" (with out th e1 6) w e a restill in c ha rge
< s ergiuse n s> m v o f e els like it m ight stillb e y our pr ob lem if onl y totr a nsi tion correc tlyð
<mvo > sil2 1 00: sou n ds like  we ne edtofixt he  a cce ss :)< Ch ipa c a>I couldus erevie ws o n # 5 957(it  unb locks  #5955)
<mup>  PR  #59 5 7:overl ord/s naps ho tstat e/back end:fa ll back on sudo  whe n no runu ser  < Sna ps hotsð ¸ó  ><Cr eated b y chipa c a><h t t p s: //github.com/snapc or e / sn apd/pull /5957> <m up >  PR #595 5:   c md/s n a p, te sts: sn apshotsfor al l  < Sn apshots  ð ¸ó  >  <â Block e d> < Create d by chi paca> <https://githu b .com/snapcore / sn a p d/ p ull/ 595 5>
<mvo> si l210 0 : sn ap r e ci pei s her e htt ps : // g ithub.com/snapcore/ co re16
< mvo>sil2100: andyou should h a ve store  acc e ss now :)
<sil210 0> mv o: thank y o u!
<mvo>  sil2 100: let  me knowi f  I can h elp , s orr y i f my  earlier repl y to s er giusens   s oundedstr ang e,I t hi nk for co re16 wene ed  t he  sa me me c hanismsas  fo rcor e18,i .e. awatch er t ha ts can s for p a ck a g e ch an ge s an d t ha t the n tr i gge rs a co re16 buil d p l us s om e(auto)testing
<sil2 10 0> mvo: su re ! T he scr i p t for co re18 is ready btw., jus t  waitin g f or so me t ime to po keSteveabo u t a ni ce com fy pl ac e f o r  it t o be  on 
< sil2100> H o p efu lly I  w on't  have t o create a new ins t anc e for it, mymoj o mo j o  i s w e ak <mv o> sil 2 1 00: cool
<
Created by_jdstrand> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5980>
<sil2100>_mvo, sergiusens: aaaaa, for_core16 it's_well,_not foundations_as_far as I_know
<sil2100> mvo, sergiusens:_since I don't have_upload access for_core16_in the store or even snap recipe access (AFAIK)
<mvo> sil2100: for core16 it is_-_for "core"_(without_the_16) we are still in_charge
<sergiusens> mvo feels like it_might still_be your problem if only to transition correctly_ð
<mvo>_sil2100: sounds like_we need to fix the access :)
<Chipaca> I could_use reviews on #5957 (it unblocks_#5955)
<mup> PR #5957:_overlord/snapshotstate/backend:_fall_back on sudo when_no runuser <Snapshots ð¸ó > <Created by_chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5957>
<mup> PR #5955:  cmd/snap,_tests: snapshots for all <Snapshots ð¸ó > <â_Blocked> <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5955>
<mvo> sil2100:_snap recipe is here https://github.com/snapcore/core16
<mvo>_sil2100: and_you should have store access_now :)
<sil2100> mvo:_thank you!
<mvo>_sil2100: let me_know if I can help, sorry_if my earlier_reply to sergiusens  sounded strange,_I_think for core16_we_need_the same_mechanisms as for_core18,_i.e. a_watcher_that scans for package changes and_that_then triggers a core16 build plus some_(auto) testing
<sil2100> mvo: sure!_The_script for core18 is_ready btw., just waiting for_some time to poke Steve about_a nice_comfy place_for it to be on
<sil2100> Hopefully I won't have to create_a new instance for it, my_mojo mojo is weak
<mvo>_sil2100: cool
<