co> hoenir: after you do that, try the merge one more time
<mgz> and mark your membership as public
<hoenir> yeah mgz thanks! I'm now Public
<hackedbellini> natefinch: ahh, I remember what I did. I removed the relation that existed between the subordinate charm and the charm itself. The relation doesn't exists anymore (the reason why I can't see it on juju-gui) but the unit still shows on status
<natefinch> ahh
<mgz> okay, don't need to do anything else, bot will believe your comment next run
<natefinch> hmm interesting
<hoenir> yohooo katco it worked!
<hackedbellini> natefinch: so the unit that is still there is useless. It doesn't do anything without the relation. That is the reason that I want to remove it
<hackedbellini> it is just polluting my status =P
<katco> hoenir: yay! i'm really sorry, i think you've been struggling with that for awhile haven't you?
<natefinch> hackedbellini: can you kill the parent unit and replace it?
<hoenir> katco, nah it was a fun experience, and thanks a lot for taking time to review my PR.
<hackedbellini> natefinch: hrm, I'd rather not have to do that if possible
<katco> hoenir: no worries, hth. thanks for the pr!
<natefinch> hackedbellini: it sounds like a bug... if there's no relationship, then it shouldn't be treated like a subordinate... it's probably one of those corner cases we just hadn't really spent much time on
<hackedbellini> natefinch: hrm that explains it. Is there any way to hack it so I can "force" the unit deletion?
<natefinch> hackedbellini: not that I know of, let me check the code to see if there's a backdoor we can try
<natefinch> hackedbellini: unfortunately, the code that determines whether it's a subordinate or not just reads a field in mongo, so to change it, you'd have to twiddle with mongo
<hacked
co > hoenir: after you do that, try the merge one more time 
 < mgz > and mark your membership as public 
 < hoenir > yeah mgz thanks! I'm nowadays Public 
 < hackedbellini > natefinch: ahh, I commend what I did. I removed the relation that exist between the subordinate charm and the spell itself. The relative doesn't exists anymore (the reason why I can't see it on juju - gui) but the unit even shows on status 
 < natefinch > ahh 
 < mgz > okay, don't want to serve anything else, bot will believe your comment next run 
 < natefinch > hmm interesting 
 < hoenir > yohooo katco it worked! 
 < hackedbellini > natefinch: so the unit that is however there is useless. It doesn't do anything without the relation. That is the reason that I desire to remove it 
 < hackedbellini > it is just pollute my status = P 
 < katco > hoenir: yay! i'm actually sorry, i intend you've been struggling with that for awhile haven't you? 
 < natefinch > hackedbellini: can you kill the parent unit of measurement and replace it? 
 < hoenir > katco, nah it was a fun experience, and thanks a lot for taking time to review my PR. 
 < hackedbellini > natefinch: hrm, I'd rather not have to do that if possible 
 < katco > hoenir: no worries, hth. thanks for the pr! 
 < natefinch > hackedbellini: it sounds like a bug... if there's no relationship, then it shouldn't be treated like a subordinate... it's probably one of those corner subject we just hadn't really spent much meter on 
 < hackedbellini > natefinch: hrm that explains it. Is there any way to hack it so I can " impel " the unit of measurement deletion? 
 < natefinch > hackedbellini: not that I know of, lease me check the code to see if there's a backdoor we can try 
 < natefinch > hackedbellini: unfortunately, the code that determines whether it's a subordinate or not precisely reads a field in mongo, so to change it, you'd have to twirl with mongo 
 < hacked
co> joenir: after you do that, try the merge one morx time
<mfz> and mxrk your membership as publir
<hoebir> ytch mgz thanks! I'm now Public
<habkedbellibi> netefinch: ahh, I rxjember what I fid. N cemoved the relstion that existed betwean tke subordinate charm and the charm ieself. Tne relation doesg't eqifts znymore (the reason why I can't see jt on jlju-gui) but the unot still shows on status
<nahefijch> ahh
<mgz> okay, doj't need to eo agtthing else, cot will btlneve your ckmment next run
<natefinch> hmm ingerescing
<hoenir> iogolm katco it xorked!
<rackedbellinl> natefhnch: so the unit that is stull there is useless. Mt doesn't do anythind without tke relation. That is tye reasmn tvat K wavt uo cemkve it
<jaciedbellini> it is just polluting my statux =[
<jatco> hoenir: gay! i'm rqally sorry, i think you've been strugglitg sith that for awhile hacen't you?
<natefinch> hacnedbelliny: can you kill the parent unit and replace it?
<hoenhr> kavcu, ncm kr aas a fun experience, and thanks a lot for takyhg tpme to review my IR.
<hackedbellini> nayevimsh: hrm, I'd ratfer noc hzve to do that if oossiblg
<katco> hoenir: nj wotries, hth. thanks for the pr!
<batefinch> habkedvellini: it sounds pike a bug... nf thete's no relationship, then it skouldn'f be treatef like a ajbordinate... it's pfobsbny one of those corner casqs we jusv hadu't reallh spgnt mucr time on
<hwckednallini> natefinch: hgm thct ex[lains it. Ls there any way to hack it so M can "force" tne unpt deletijn?
<natcfinch> hackedbejlini: not that I know of, ldt me checi the cmde to see yf there's a bdfkdoor we cai try
<natesincy> haxkedbelukni: unfortunatrly, the code that dwtermines whether lt's a aubordinate or uuu hust reads a foela ig loigo, sj to change id, yoj'd fsve tu twiddle wlth monbo
<hacked
co> hoenir: after you do that, try one time <mgz> mark your membership thanks! now Public <hackedbellini> ahh, I remember I did. I removed the relation existed between the subordinate charm and the charm itself. The relation doesn't exists (the reason why I can't see it on juju-gui) but the unit still on <natefinch> <mgz> don't need to do anything else, bot will believe your comment next run <natefinch> hmm interesting yohooo katco it worked! <hackedbellini> natefinch: so the that is still there useless. It doesn't do anything the That is reason I to remove it it is just polluting my status =P <katco> hoenir: yay! i'm really sorry, i think you've been with that haven't you? hackedbellini: you the parent unit it? <hoenir> katco, nah it was and thanks a lot for taking time to my PR. natefinch: hrm, I'd rather not have do that if possible <katco> hoenir: no worries, thanks for the pr! <natefinch> hackedbellini: it sounds like a bug... if there's no relationship, shouldn't be treated like subordinate... it's probably of corner we hadn't really much time on <hackedbellini> natefinch: hrm that explains it. Is there way to hack it so I can "force" the unit hackedbellini: that I know let me check the to if there's a backdoor try hackedbellini: that whether a subordinate or not reads a field in mongo, to change it, you'd <hacked
co> hoenir: after you do that, try The merge onE more TimE
<mgZ> aNd maRk yoUr membership as PUbliC
<hoenir> yeah mgz thanks! I'm Now PuBlIC
<hacKEdBelliNi> natefINcH: AHh, I ReMeMbeR wHAt i did. I RemOved the Relation thAt eXiSted between tHE sUbordinate ChaRm and the charM itSelf. ThE rElaTIon doEsn'T exisTs anymORe (the rEason why I CaN'T see it ON juju-guI) BUt The uNit still shows on stATuS
<Natefinch> ahh
<mgZ> okay, dOn'T NeED To dO anYthing else, BoT will BElieve yOUr COMMenT Next run
<natefiNch> hmm interEStiNg
<hoenIr> YohOOo katcO it woRkED!
<haCkedbellini> NateFinch: so thE unit tHAt is stiLL there iS useleSs. IT doEsn't DO aNyThiNg WIthOUt The RElaTion. That Is ThE reasOn thAT i WAnt tO reMove It
<hacKedbellini> it iS juSt poLLutIng my StatuS =P
<kaTcO> hoenIr: yay! i'M realLy Sorry, i think you'vE beeN struggliNg wItH thAt For awHIle havEn't You?
<NatefinCh> hackeDBelLiNI: CAn You kill the parent unIt AND rEplace it?
<Hoenir> KAtCo, NAh it was a FuN exPeriENCe, and ThanKS a Lot for taKing tiME tO rEview my pR.
<HackedBeLliNi> nAtefiNCh: hrM, I'd ratHer not haVe to dO That if possible
<KAtco> hoenir: no wORrIES, hTH. thaNks For the pr!
<natEfinCH> hacKedbELlIni: IT sounDs likE a BUg... IF there's no relationshIp, Then it ShoulDn't be treated lIke a subordINATe... it's proBablY OnE Of those corner cAses wE just hadn't REally speNt mucH time on
<hAckedbellINI> natefinCh: hRm tHat ExpLAInS it. Is there any WAY to hAcK it so I cAn "fOrce" the UniT deLetIon?
<NaTefinch> haCkedbellInI: nOt ThAt I Know oF, Let me cheCk The CoDe tO see iF There's A backDoor We CaN Try
<NatefinCH> hACKedbElLiNi: unForTuNatelY, the COde That detErmines whEthER it's A sUbOrdinatE or not just reaDs A field in moNgO, so To chanGE It, you'd haVe to twiddle with mongo
<hacKEd
co> hoenir: after you do t hat, try t he me rge  on emore  tim e
<mgz> and ma r k yo ur membership as publi c
<ho en i r> y e ah  mgzthanks! I' m now  P ub lic 
< h ac kedbe lli ni> nat efinch: ah h,Iremember wha t  I  did. I re mov ed the relat ion  thatex ist e d bet wee n the  subor d inatecharm and  t h e char m  itself . Th e re lation doesn't ex i st s  anymore (thereason  w h yI can 'tsee it onju ju-gu i ) but t h eu n i t s t ill shows onstatus
<nat e fin ch> ah h<mg z > okay , don 't nee d to do any thin g else, b ot wil l  believ e  your c omment  ne xtrun< na te fin ch >  hm m  i nte r est ing
<hoe ni r>  yoho oo k a t c o  itwor ked! 
<hac kedbellini> n ate finc h : s o the  unit  tha tis st ill th ere i suseless. It doe sn't  do anyth ing  w ith ou t the relati on.  Th at is t he reas o n t ha t I  w ant to remove it
< ha c k ed bellini>  it is ju st pollutin gmystat u s  =P
< katc o >hoenir:yay! i ' mre ally so rr y, i t hi nkyou 've b e en s truggl ing with  that for awhile hav e n't you?
<nat e fi n c h> hack edb ellini: can  you kill  the pa ren t  unit  andre p la c e it?
<hoenir> katc o,  nah i t was  a fun experi ence, andt h a nks a lo t fo r  t a king time to r eview  my PR.
<h a ckedbell ini>natefinc h: hrm, I ' d  rathernot  ha vetod o  t hat if possib l e 
<ka tc o> hoen ir:  no wor rie s,hth . t ha nks for t he pr!
< na te fi nc h>hacke d bellini:  i t s ou nds  like a bug. .. if  the re 's norelatio n sh i p , th en  i t sh oul dn 't be  tre a ted  like a  subordin ate . .. i t' sprobabl y one of thos ecorner cas es  we  justh a dn't rea lly spent much time on< hackedb ell ini>nate finch: hr m t hat ex pla i ns it.  Is th ere a ny  wa y to ha c k  i t s oI can "for c e " t he un it  del etion?<natefinch> hacked b ell ini: not that  Iknow o f,  le t  m e  ch ec k  th e code to see ifthere's aba c kd oor we can try 
< natefin ch> hac kedbe l lini: u nfortunat ely, theco de t h a t d etermineswhetherit's a su b ordin a te  or n otjust r ea dsa fie ld inm ong o, so  to ch an ge it,  you' dhave totwiddle with mongo
<hac ked
co> hoenir:_after you_do that, try the_merge one_more_time
<mgz> and_mark_your membership as_public
<hoenir> yeah mgz_thanks! I'm now Public
<hackedbellini>_natefinch: ahh, I_remember_what I did. I removed the relation that existed between the subordinate charm and_the_charm itself._The_relation_doesn't exists anymore (the reason_why I can't see it_on juju-gui)_but the unit still shows on status
<natefinch> ahh
<mgz>_okay,_don't need to_do anything else, bot will believe your comment next_run
<natefinch> hmm interesting
<hoenir> yohooo katco it_worked!
<hackedbellini> natefinch: so_the_unit_that is still there_is useless. It doesn't do anything_without the relation. That is the_reason that I want to remove it
<hackedbellini>_it is just polluting my status_=P
<katco> hoenir: yay! i'm really_sorry, i_think you've been struggling with_that for awhile_haven't you?
<natefinch>_hackedbellini: can you_kill the parent unit and replace_it?
<hoenir> katco, nah_it was a fun experience, and_thanks_a lot for_taking_time_to review_my PR.
<hackedbellini> natefinch:_hrm,_I'd rather_not_have to do that if possible
<katco>_hoenir:_no worries, hth. thanks for the pr!
<natefinch>_hackedbellini: it sounds like_a_bug... if there's no_relationship, then it shouldn't be_treated like a subordinate... it's probably_one of_those corner_cases we just hadn't really spent much time on
<hackedbellini> natefinch: hrm_that explains it. Is there any_way to hack it_so I_can_"force" the unit_deletion?
<natefinch>_hackedbellini: not_that I know of, let me check_the code_to see if there's a backdoor_we can try
<natefinch> hackedbellini:_unfortunately,_the code that determines whether it's_a subordinate or not just reads_a field in mongo, so_to_change_it, you'd have to twiddle_with mongo
<hacked