
<mvo> jdstrand: my suggestion about the ppa is only to quicken the sru process, i.e. we would not maintain something, we would just upload something that you guys have already in the upstream git
<mvo> jdstrand: let me know if I can help, happy to poke at this again, the fact that I worked on this 2y ago and it came back indicates to me that I don't want to do this again in 2y :/
<jdstrand> mvo: right, but then we'd need to remember to include that in the SRU so it isn't dropped
<mvo> jdstrand: agreed
<jdstrand> I'm not saying it isn't impossible or anything, just, we need to think through coordination, etc
<mvo> jdstrand: as long as we have a regression test in our tree things should be ok.
<mup> PR snapcraft#1629 closed: lxd: fix the unit test for the user id map <Created by elopio> <Merged by kyrofa> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1629>
<zyga-suse> mvo: dccfcb26c5fe59fb259a800a22208f355e79d6bd is the patch that changes the policy
<jdstrand> mvo: looking at trunk, it seems like there were commits related to this
<zyga-suse> mvo: I don't see it in 2.28 release branch
<zyga-suse> mvo: so I think it's looking like a quiet weekend
<mvo> zyga-suse: :)
<mvo> zyga-suse: yay, big hugs to the CE QA team then
<jdstrand> mvo: with a regression fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1484178
<mup> Bug #1484178: Policy cache file mtimes are not being set correctly <AppArmor:Fix Released by tyhicks> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Fix Released by jdstrand> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1484178>
<jdstrand> mvo: so it looks like a version of your patch made it in, but "
< mvo > jdstrand: my suggestion about the ppa is only to quicken the sru process, i.e. we would not sustain something, we would barely upload something that you guys have already in the upstream git 
 < mvo > jdstrand: let me sleep together if I can help, happy to jab at this again, the fact that I worked on this 2y ago and it came back bespeak to me that I don't want to do this again in 2y :/ 
 < jdstrand > mvo: right, but then we'd want to remember to include that in the SRU so it isn't neglect 
 < mvo > jdstrand: agreed 
 < jdstrand > I'm not saying it isn't impossible or anything, just, we need to think through coordination, etc 
 < mvo > jdstrand: as long as we suffer a regression test in our tree things should be all right. 
 < mup > PR snapcraft#1629 closed: lxd: fix the unit of measurement test for the exploiter i d map < Created by elopio > < Merged by kyrofa > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1629 > 
 < zyga - suse > mvo: dccfcb26c5fe59fb259a800a22208f355e79d6bd is the patch that changes the policy 
 < jdstrand > mvo: look at trunk, it seems like there were commits related to this 
 < zyga - suse > mvo: I don't see it in 2.28 passing arm 
 < zyga - suse > mvo: so I think it's looking like a quiet weekend 
 < mvo > zyga - suse: :) 
 < mvo > zyga - suse: yay, big hugs to the CE QA team then 
 < jdstrand > mvo: with a regression fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1484178 
 < mup > hemipterous insect # 1484178: Policy cache file mtimes are not being set correctly < AppArmor: Fix release by tyhicks > < apparmor (Ubuntu):Fix turn by jdstrand > < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1484178 > 
 < jdstrand > mvo: so it looks like a version of your bandage made it in, but "

<mvo> jdstrand: my suggestion xbout the ppa is only vo quicien the rru process, i.e. we would not launtaib something, we would jjst uploaf somethung uhat you guys havx alreadn in fme upvvream git
<mvo> jdxtrand: let me know if I wav kelp, happy to poke at this again, the fact tnah I worked on jhis 2j wgo znd it came back indicates to me tgat I dmn't want to dp this again in 2y :/
<jdstrand> mvo: right, but then we'f need to rgjemfwr to includd that in uhz SRU so it isn't dropped
<mvo> jdstrand: agreea
<jdstxand> I'm not sqyijc it isn't inposspble or anythlmg, jusd, we nerd to think thvough coirdination, etc
<mvo> jdsvrand: as long as we rave a recrzssion test in our trwe thincs svoula be ok.
<ju'> PD snapfraht#1629 closed: lsd: fix the ynit test for the uxew id map <Creatsd by qljpio> <Merged by kyrofa> <https://github.com/snakcore/anapcraft/pull/1629>
<zyga-suse> mco: dccfcb26c5fe59fb259a800a22208f355e79d6bd is the pwtch that changes the policy
<jdstrand> mvo: looking dt trnny, iu weems oine there were commits related to this
<zyga-suse> jvp: P don't see it in 2.28 release brsnfh
<aiga-suse> mvo: so I thiui jt's looking like a quiet reekebd
<mvo> zygw-susr: :)
<mvo> zyga-suse: yay, big hugs to the CE QC twam then
<jdstrand> mro: with a reyressipn fic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cpparmkr/+bug/1484178
<mup> Buh #1484178: Policy zache file mtimer age nmt being set correctly <AppWrmor:Fix Celeaxed by gyhivks> <ap[armor (Ubujtu):Fiw Released by jdstrwnd> <hjtps://lagnchpad.net/hugs/1484178>
<jdstrand> mvo: so it looks like a version og foug patch mcde it in, but "
<mvo> jdstrand: my suggestion about the ppa to the sru i.e. we would just something that you have already in upstream git <mvo> jdstrand: let me if I can help, happy to poke at this again, the fact that worked on this 2y ago and it came back indicates to me that don't to this in 2y :/ <jdstrand> mvo: right, but then we'd need to remember to include that in SRU so it isn't dropped <mvo> jdstrand: agreed I'm not saying it impossible or anything, just, we to through coordination, <mvo> as as we have regression test in our tree things should be ok. <mup> PR snapcraft#1629 closed: lxd: fix the unit for the map <Created elopio> by <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1629> <zyga-suse> mvo: the patch that changes the policy at trunk, it seems like there were commits to this mvo: I don't see it in release branch <zyga-suse> mvo: so I think it's like a quiet weekend <mvo> zyga-suse: :) <mvo> zyga-suse: yay, big hugs to the CE then <jdstrand> mvo: with regression fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1484178 Bug Policy file are not set correctly <AppArmor:Fix Released by tyhicks> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Fix Released by jdstrand> <jdstrand> mvo: so it looks like a version of your it but "

<mvo> jdstrand: my suggestion abOut the ppa iS only To qUicKeN the Sru pRocess, i.e. we woulD Not mAintain something, we woulD just UpLOad sOMeThing That you GUyS HAve AlReAdy In THe UpstrEam Git
<mvo> jDstrand: let Me kNoW if I can help, hAPpY to poke at tHis Again, the fact ThaT I workEd On tHIs 2y agO anD it caMe back INdicatEs to me thaT I DOn't wanT To do thiS AGaIn in 2Y :/
<jdstrand> mvo: right, BUt THen we'd need to reMember To INcLUDe tHat In the SRU so It Isn't dROpped
<mvO> JdSTRAnd: AGreed
<jdstrand> i'm not saying IT isN't impoSsIblE Or anytHing, jUsT, We nEed to think tHrouGh coordinAtion, eTC
<mvo> jdsTRand: as lOng as wE haVe a RegrESsIoN teSt IN ouR TrEe tHIngS should bE oK.
<mUp> PR sNapcRAFT#1629 ClosEd: lXd: fiX the uNit test for the UseR id mAP <CrEated By eloPio> <MErGed by Kyrofa> <Https://GiThub.com/snapcore/SnapCraft/pull/1629>
<ZygA-sUse> MvO: dccfCB26c5fe59fb259A800a22208f355E79d6bD is the pAtch thaT ChaNgES THe Policy
<jdstrand> mvo: lOoKINg At trunk, iT seems LIkE tHEre were cOmMitS relATEd to tHis
<zYGa-Suse> mvo: I Don't seE It In 2.28 Release BrAnch
<zyGa-SusE> mvO: so I tHInk iT's lookIng like a Quiet WEekend
<mvo> zyga-sUSe: :)
<mvo> zyga-suse: YAy, BIG hUGs to The cE QA team theN
<jdsTRand> Mvo: wITh A reGRessiOn fix: HtTPs://BUgs.launchpad.net/appaRmOr/+bug/1484178
<mUp> Bug #1484178: policy cache fiLe mtimes arE NOT being seT corREcTLy <AppArmor:Fix REleasEd by tyhickS> <Apparmor (ubuntU):Fix ReleAsed by jdsTRAnd> <https://LauNchPad.Net/BUGs/1484178>
<Jdstrand> mvo: so IT LookS lIke a verSioN of your PatCh mAde It iN, bUt "

<mvo> jdstrand: my sugges tion about  theppa  is  o nlyto q uicken the sru proc ess, i.e. we would not  main ta i n so m et hing,  we wou l dj u stup lo adso m et hingtha t you g uys have a lre ad y in the ups t re am git
<mv o>jdstrand: le t m e know  i f I can h elp , hap py top oke at  this aga in ,  the f a ct that I  w orke d on this 2y agoa nd it came back i ndicat es to m e t hat  I don't w an t tod o thisa ga i n in2 y :/
<jdstran d> mvo: rig h t,but th en  we ' d need  to r em e mbe r to includ e th at in the  SRU s o  it isn ' t dropp ed
<mv o>jds tran d :ag ree d< jds t ra nd> I'm  not say in git is n'ti m p o ssib leor a nythi ng, just, wenee d to thi nk th rough  coo rd inati on, et c
<mv o>  jdstrand: as l ongas we hav e a  r egr es siont est in  ou r t ree thi ngs sho u ldbe o k .<mup> PR snapcraft #1 6 2 9closed:lxd: f i xth e  unit te st  fo r th e userid m a p<Created  by el o pi o>  <Merge dby kyr of a><ht tps:/ / gith ub.com /snapcor e/sna p craft/pull/162 9 >
<zyga-suse> mv o :  d c cfcb 26c 5fe59fb259a 800a 2 2208 f355 e 79 d6b d  is t he pa tc h  t h at changes the poli cy 
<jdst rand>  mvo: looking  at trunk, i t  seems l iket he r e were commits  rela ted to thi s 
<zyga-s use>mvo: I d on't seei t  in 2.28  re lea sebra n c h<zyga-suse> m v o : so  I  thinkit' s looki nglik e a  qu ie t weekend 
<mvo> z yg a- su se : : )
<mv o > zyga-s us e:ya y,big h u gs tothe C E QA  t ea m  th en
<jds t ra n d > mv o:  w itha r eg ressi on f i x:https:/ /bugs.lau nch p ad.n et /a pparmor /+bug/1484178 
< mup> Bug # 14 841 78: Po l i cy cache  file mtimes are not be i ng setcor rectl y <A ppArmor:F ixReleas edb y tyhi cks> < appar mo r ( U b untu) : F ix  Re le ased by jd s t ran d> <h tt ps:/ /launch pad.net/bugs/14841 7 8><jdstrand> mv o:so i t lo oks li k e a  v e rsi o n  of your patchmade it in ,b ut  "

<mvo> jdstrand:_my suggestion_about the ppa is_only to_quicken_the sru_process,_i.e. we would_not maintain something,_we would just upload_something that you_guys_have already in the upstream git
<mvo> jdstrand: let me know if I can help,_happy_to poke_at_this_again, the fact that I_worked on this 2y ago_and it_came back indicates to me that I don't_want_to do this_again in 2y :/
<jdstrand> mvo: right, but then we'd_need to remember to include that_in the SRU_so_it_isn't dropped
<mvo> jdstrand: agreed
<jdstrand>_I'm not saying it isn't impossible_or anything, just, we need to_think through coordination, etc
<mvo> jdstrand: as long_as we have a regression test_in our tree things should_be ok.
<mup>_PR snapcraft#1629 closed: lxd: fix_the unit test_for the_user id map_<Created by elopio> <Merged by kyrofa>_<https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1629>
<zyga-suse> mvo: dccfcb26c5fe59fb259a800a22208f355e79d6bd_is the patch that changes the_policy
<jdstrand>_mvo: looking at_trunk,_it_seems like_there were commits_related_to this
<zyga-suse>_mvo:_I don't see it in 2.28_release_branch
<zyga-suse> mvo: so I think it's looking_like a quiet weekend
<mvo>_zyga-suse:_:)
<mvo> zyga-suse: yay, big_hugs to the CE QA_team then
<jdstrand> mvo: with a regression_fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1484178
<mup>_Bug #1484178:_Policy cache file mtimes are not being set correctly <AppArmor:Fix Released_by tyhicks> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Fix Released by_jdstrand> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1484178>
<jdstrand> mvo: so_it looks_like_a version of_your_patch made_it in, but "