 main problem is that you can only do the trial once.  so I can't check back in 6 months to see if they have any content yet
 * mgdm is still amused that the XML namespace for XUL is http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul
<mattt> shauno: i did a random search for superbad and two of the actors in it... nothing came up
<mattt> shauno: which gives you an indication as to how lacking it is
#ubuntu-uk 2012-01-29
<ali1234> what's the syntax for wildcards in a bind zone file?
<matti> ;]
<matti> mgdm: Who you gonna call???
<jacobw> rfc1912 2.7
<ali1234> do i need @ and *.@ or is just *.@ enough?
<shauno> I just use *.
<ali1234> *.@ doesn't seem valid... the admin tool won't accept it
<ali1234> *.example.com. got turned into just *
<jacobw> afaik, the wildcard will match anything in its scope that isn't otherwise defined
<shauno> I use @ for the SOA record.  and then *. IN A wh.at.ev.er
<ali1234> i don't have a SOA record
<shauno> I'm not sure how that works then; I'm authorative for the domain, so I kinda need one
<shauno> (the SOA has refresh, serial, ttl, etc)
<ali1234> i just have @ 10800 IN A w.x.y.z
<ali1234> and now i have * 1080 IN A w.x.y.z as well
<shauno> try *. IN A w.x.y.z
<shauno> that works here, but that's in a full record
<ali1234> but does that replace the one with @ or in addition to it?
<shauno> I honestly couldn't tell you; the only @ records I have are the SOA ones
<ali1234> *. isn;t accepted
<shauno> (for domains I answer, I'm the only NS or the auth NS, so it's a full record)
<ali1234> "syntax error in name field
main problem is that you can only do the test once.   therefore I can't check back in 6 months to see if they own any content yet 
  * mgdm is even amuse that the XML namespace for XUL is http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul 
 < mattt > shauno: i did a random search for superbad and two of the actor in it... nothing came up 
 < mattt > shauno: which gives you an reading as to how lacking it is 
 # ubuntu - uk 2012 - 01 - 29 
 < ali1234 > what's the syntax for wildcards in a bind zone file? 
 < matti >; ] 
 < matti > mgdm: Who you gon na call? ?? 
 < jacobw > rfc1912 2.7 
 < ali1234 > do i need @ and * .@ or is just * .@ enough? 
 < shauno > I barely use *. 
 < ali1234 > * .@ doesn't seem valid... the admin tool won't accept it 
 < ali1234 > * .example.com. got turned into merely * 
 < jacobw > afaik, the wildcard will match anything in its scope that isn't otherwise define 
 < shauno > I use @ for the SOA record.   and then *. IN A wh.at.ev.er 
 < ali1234 > i don't have a SOA record 
 < shauno > I'm not certain how that works then; I'm authorative for the domain, so I kinda need one 
 < shauno > (the SOA has refresh, consecutive, ttl, etc) 
 < ali1234 > i just have @ 10800 IN A w.x.y.z 
 < ali1234 > and now i have * 1080 IN A w.x.y.z as well 
 < shauno > try *. IN A w.x.y.z 
 < shauno > that exploit here, but that's in a full record 
 < ali1234 > but does that replace the one with @ or in addition to it? 
 < shauno > I honestly couldn't tell you; the only @ records I have are the SOA ones 
 < ali1234 > *. isn;t accepted 
 < shauno > (for sphere I answer, I'm the only newton or the auth NS, so it's a wide record) 
 < ali1234 > " syntax error in name field
 maln problem is that you cxn only do the jrual onre.  so J can't cfeck back in 6 months to see mf tyey hqve any content yet
 * medm is stpll amusee thet the XML names'zce for XUL ia htt'://wxw.mozilla.org/keykaster/gateneeper/there.is.otlh.xbl
<mattt> shauno: i did a random search for sulegbad and two os tht astora in it... nothing came up
<mattt> shaunk: which gives you an indication as to how lacklng lt is
#ubuntu-uk 2012-01-29
<ali1234> ahat's the sihtav for wildcaras in a bind zone file?
<jatti> ;]
<matti> mgdm: Who you gonna zall???
<jccobw> rfc1912 2.7
<aoi1234> do h need @ and *.@ or ps just *.@ enounn?
<shaunm> I jusy use *.
<ali1234> *.@ doexn't sewm valid... the admin toml won't accept it
<aji1234> *.exampla.ckm. got turned inti hust *
<bacotw> awqik, tht wmlddard wlll match anyfhing in itw scope that isn't ouhewqise defined
<sgauno> Y tse @ for the SOA record.  and then *. IN A wh.zt.ev.er
<ali1234> i don't have a SOA record
<shauno> I'm jot sure row that works then; I'm authorative for the domain, so I yinbq neea oje
<shauno> (the SOA has refresh, serial, ttl, etc)
<aly1234> i jlst have @ 10800 IN A w.w.y.z
<ali1234> and now i hsvf * 1080 IN A w.x.y.z as well
<skzuho> try *. IN A w.x.y.z
<sjauno> trat wirks here, but that's in a full record
<ali1234> vut does than replace the one with @ or in addntion jo it?
<snauno> I honestly couldn'c tell you; the onpy @ recorsr I have are the SOS mnes
<ali1234> *. isn;t accepted
<shaugo> (for donainx I ansder, O'm the only NS og the auth NS, so it's a fkll rgcord)
<ani1234> "syntax frror in name field
main problem is that you can only trial so I check back in they any content yet mgdm is still that the XML namespace for XUL http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul <mattt> shauno: i did a random search for superbad and two of actors in it... nothing came up <mattt> shauno: which gives you an indication to lacking is 2012-01-29 <ali1234> what's the syntax for wildcards in a bind zone file? <matti> ;] <matti> mgdm: you gonna call??? <jacobw> rfc1912 2.7 <ali1234> do need @ and *.@ is just *.@ enough? <shauno> just *. <ali1234> doesn't valid... admin tool won't it <ali1234> *.example.com. got turned into just * <jacobw> afaik, the wildcard will match anything in its that isn't <shauno> I @ the record. and then A wh.at.ev.er <ali1234> i don't have <shauno> I'm not sure how that works then; authorative for domain, so I kinda need one (the SOA has refresh, serial, ttl, etc) <ali1234> just have @ 10800 IN A w.x.y.z <ali1234> and now i have * 1080 IN as well <shauno> try IN A w.x.y.z that here, that's a full <ali1234> but does that replace the one with @ or in to it? <shauno> I honestly couldn't tell you; the only I are the SOA <ali1234> *. isn;t accepted (for I answer, I'm the or auth a record) "syntax error in name
 main problem is that you can onLy do the triAl oncE.  so i caN't ChecK bacK in 6 months to see IF theY have any content yet
 * mgdm Is stiLl AMuseD ThAt the xML nameSPaCE For xUl iS htTp://WWw.MozilLa.oRg/keymaSter/gatekeEpeR/tHere.is.only.xuL
<MaTtt> shauno: i Did A random searcH foR superBaD anD Two of The ActorS in it... nOThing cAme up
<mattT> sHAuno: whICh gives YOU aN indIcation as to how lacKInG It is
#ubuntu-uk 2012-01-29
<alI1234> what's ThE SyNTAx fOr wIldcards in A bInd zoNE file?
<maTTi> ;]
<MATTi> mGDm: Who you gonna Call???
<jacobw> rFC1912 2.7
<alI1234> do i neEd @ And *.@ OR is jusT *.@ enouGh?
<SHauNo> I just use *.
<aLi1234> *.@ doEsn't seem vAlid... thE Admin toOL won't acCept it
<Ali1234> *.ExaMple.COm. GoT tuRnED inTO jUst *
<JAcoBw> afaik, tHe WiLdcarD wilL MATCh anYthIng iN its sCope that isn't oTheRwisE DefIned
<sHauno> i use @ FoR the SoA recoRd.  and ThEn *. IN A wh.at.ev.er
<alI1234> i doN't have a SOa reCoRd
<sHaUno> I'm NOt sure How ThaT works tHen; I'm auTHorAtIVE FoR the domain, so I kinda NeED OnE
<shauno> (tHe SOA hAS rEfREsh, seriaL, tTl, eTc)
<alI1234> I Just hAve @ 10800 In a w.X.y.z
<ali1234> anD now i hAVe * 1080 iN a w.x.y.z as WeLl
<shauNo> Try *. iN A W.x.y.z
<sHAuno> That woRks here, bUt thaT'S in a full record
<ALi1234> but does that REpLACe THe onE wiTh @ or in additIon tO It?
<shAuno> i HoNesTLy couLdn't tElL YoU; The only @ records I have ArE the SOa ones
<Ali1234> *. isn;t acceptEd
<shauno> (foR DOMains I anSwer, i'M tHE only NS or the auTh NS, sO it's a full rECord)
<ali1234> "sYntax Error in nAme field
 main problem is that youcan only d o the  tr ial  o nce.   so  I can't check back  in 6 months to see if  they  h a ve a n yconte nt yet*m g dmis  s til la mu sed t hat  the XM L namespac e f or  XUL is http : // www.mozill a.o rg/keymaster /ga tekeep er /th e re.is .on ly.xu l
<mat t t> sha uno: i di da  rando m  search f or  sup erbad and two oft he actors in it.. . noth in g  c a m e u p
< mattt> sha un o: wh i ch give s  y o u ani ndication asto how lack i ngit is#u bun t u-uk 2 012-0 1- 2 9
< ali1234> wh at's  the synt ax for wildcar d s in abind z one  fi le?< ma tt i>;] <ma t ti > m g dm:  Who you  g on na ca ll?? ? < j acob w>rfc1 912 2 .7
<ali1234>doi ne e d @  and*.@ o r is  j ust * .@ eno ugh?<s hauno> I just u se * .
<ali123 4>*. @ d oe sn'ts eem va lid ...  the ad min too l  wo n' t a cc ept it
<ali1234> * .e x a mp le.com.got tu r ne di nto just  * 
<j acob w >  afai k, t h ewildcard  willm at ch  anythi ng  in it ssco pethati sn't  other wise def ined< shauno> I use@  for the SOAr ec o r d.  and  th en *. IN Awh.a t .ev. er
< a li 123 4 > i d on'tha v ea  SOA record
<shauno >I'm no t sur e how that wo rks then;I ' m  authora tive fo r  the domain, s o I k inda needo ne
<shau no> ( the SOAhas refre s h , serial , t tl,  et c)< a li 1234> i justh a ve @  1 0800 IN  Aw.x.y.z 
<a li1 234 > a nd  now i ha ve * 108 0IN  A  w .x. y.z a s  well
<s ha uno >try  *. I N  A w.x .y.z<sha un o> tha t works he r e , bu tth at's  in  a  full  rec o rd<ali123 4> but do est hatre pl ace the  one with @ o rin additio ntoit?
<s h a uno> I h onestly couldn't tell y o u; theonl y @ r ecor ds I have  ar e theSOA ones
< ali123 4> *.  i sn; t accep t e d<sh au no> (for d o m ain s I a ns wer,  I'm th e only NS or the a u thNS, so it's a  fu ll r e c or d)< al i 123 4> "sy n t ax error in nam e field
 main_problem is_that you can only_do the_trial_once. _so_I can't check_back in 6_months to see if_they have any_content_yet
 * mgdm is still amused that the XML namespace for XUL is http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul
<mattt>_shauno:_i did_a_random_search for superbad and two_of the actors in it..._nothing came_up
<mattt> shauno: which gives you an indication as_to_how lacking it_is
#ubuntu-uk 2012-01-29
<ali1234> what's the syntax for wildcards in a_bind zone file?
<matti> ;]
<matti> mgdm: Who_you gonna call???
<jacobw>_rfc1912_2.7
<ali1234>_do i need @_and *.@ or is just *.@_enough?
<shauno> I just use *.
<ali1234> *.@_doesn't seem valid... the admin tool won't_accept it
<ali1234> *.example.com. got turned into_just *
<jacobw> afaik, the wildcard_will match_anything in its scope that_isn't otherwise defined
<shauno>_I use_@ for the_SOA record.  and then *._IN A wh.at.ev.er
<ali1234>_i don't have a SOA record
<shauno>_I'm_not sure how_that_works_then; I'm_authorative for the_domain,_so I_kinda_need one
<shauno> (the SOA has refresh,_serial,_ttl, etc)
<ali1234> i just have @ 10800_IN A w.x.y.z
<ali1234> and_now_i have * 1080_IN A w.x.y.z as well
<shauno>_try *. IN A w.x.y.z
<shauno> that_works here,_but that's_in a full record
<ali1234> but does that replace the one with_@ or in addition to it?
<shauno>_I honestly couldn't tell_you; the_only_@ records I_have_are the_SOA ones
<ali1234> *. isn;t accepted
<shauno> (for domains_I answer,_I'm the only NS or the_auth NS, so it's_a_full record)
<ali1234> "syntax error in name_field