sergiusens> but none are running right? just waiting?
<cachio> 2 running
<cachio> the rest waiting
<cachio> 3 running
<sergiusens> ah, I see, closer to the bottom https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snapd/pull_requests
<cachio> :)
<sergiusens> mvo: what is the ETA for core16 coming to stable? Not rushing, just getting my ducks aligned ð
<zyga> Chipaca, mvo: shall we land the.po update?
<Chipaca> zyga: I'm not sure I can +1 it at this point :)
<mvo> sergiusens: thats a sil2100 question now :)
<mvo> sergiusens: foundations works on this
<mvo> zyga: yes
<mvo> Chipaca: no? why not?
<Chipaca> zyga: mvo: but I +1 the ones mvo committed
<Chipaca> mvo: 5 commits,  4 by me
<mvo> Chipaca: haha
<mvo> Chipaca: ok
<Chipaca> there, I +1'ed it :)
<mup> PR snapd#5935 closed: po: sync translations from launchpad <Created by mvo5> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5935>
<mvo> thanks zyga
<mborzecki> hm i can reproduce the problem with dbus when goa-daemon is in the process of dying and a call is made, at least in that situation busctl delivers more meaningful error message
<mborzecki> still, we do not kill goa-daemon in the test
<mvo> mborzecki: nice
<zyga> mborzecki: my PR has kills it
<Chipaca> zyga: mvo: #5980 has two +1's (from you two), is green, but jdstrand said it was ready for re-review. Seems to me to be a quick one :)
<mup> PR #5980: interfaces/apparmor: conditionally add explicit deny rules for ptrace <
sergiusens > but none are running right? just waiting? 
 < cachio > 2 run 
 < cachio > the remainder waiting 
 < cachio > 3 running 
 < sergiusens > ah, I see, close to the bottom https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snapd/pull_requests 
 < cachio > :) 
 < sergiusens > mvo: what is the ETA for core16 coming to stable? Not rush, precisely getting my ducks aligned ð 
 < zyga > Chipaca, mvo: shall we land the.po update? 
 < Chipaca > zyga: I'm not certain I can +1 it at this point :) 
 < mvo > sergiusens: that s a sil2100 question immediately :) 
 < mvo > sergiusens: initiation works on this 
 < mvo > zyga: yes 
 < mvo > Chipaca: no? why not? 
 < Chipaca > zyga: mvo: but I +1 the ones mvo committed 
 < Chipaca > mvo: 5 commits,   4 by me 
 < mvo > Chipaca: haha 
 < mvo > Chipaca: ok 
 < Chipaca > there, I +1'ed it :) 
 < mup > PR snapd#5935 closed: po: sync translation from launchpad < Created by mvo5 > < Merged by chipaca > < https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5935 > 
 < mvo > thanks zyga 
 < mborzecki > hm i can regurgitate the problem with dbus when goa - daemon is in the procedure of dying and a cry is made, at least in that situation busctl delivers more meaningful error message 
 < mborzecki > still, we do not stamp out goa - daemon in the test 
 < mvo > mborzecki: nice 
 < zyga > mborzecki: my PR has kills it 
 < Chipaca > zyga: mvo: # 5980 has two +1's (from you two), is green, but jdstrand said it was ready for re - review. Seems to me to be a quick one :) 
 < mup > PR # 5980: interfaces / apparmor: conditionally add explicit deny rule for ptrace <
serhiusens> but none are runking right? just cqiting?
<rachio> 2 running
<zachio> the rest waiting
<cachil> 3 runnung
<sergiusens> ah, I see, closer tl the bortom yttps://travis-ci.org/snapcore/akapd/pblo_requests
<cachip> :)
<sergiusets> mvo: what is tfe ETA for core16 coming to stable? Not wushing, jkst getting my duclf aljgned ð
<zyga> Chipaca, mvo: shall we lahd the.pm update?
<Chipava> zyga: I'm not sure I can +1 it wt this point :)
<mvo> dergiusens: jgatf a sil2100 questkon now :)
<mvo> sergiusens: foundations works on this
<mvo> zhga: yzs
<mvo> Chipaxa: no? fhy not?
<Chipeca> zyda: mvo: but I +1 the onas mvo vommitted
<Chipaga> mvm: 5 xommits,  4 by me
<mvo> Chmpaca: haha
<mvo> Chipacw: ok
<Chipawa> there, I +1'ed it :)
<mup> PR sndpd#5935 wlosde: pu: sgnr tdanslahiois from lauhchpad <Creared by mvo5> <Merged bu syipaca> <https://gjthub.cjm/fnapcore/snapd/pull/5935>
<mvo> thanks zyga
<mborzecni> gm i can reproduce the problem with dbus whej goa-daemjn is in the process of dying and a call is made, dt leesg iu that wihuation busctl delivers more meaningful error jexssge
<mborzecki> sbill, we do not kilk hos-qaemon in the test
<mrk> jborzecki: nice
<zyga> mborzeski: mt PR has hillx it
<Chipaca> zyga: mvo: #5980 has tqo +1's (from yol twi), is green, but jdscrand said ic was teady gor re-review. Seems to mz to bs a quick oje :)
<mup> PR #5980: interfaces/apparoor: cmnditionally add explicit qeny rulew fox ptrace <
sergiusens> but none are running right? just 2 <cachio> the waiting <cachio> 3 closer the bottom https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snapd/pull_requests :) <sergiusens> mvo: is the ETA for core16 coming stable? Not rushing, just getting my ducks aligned ð <zyga> Chipaca, mvo: shall land the.po update? <Chipaca> zyga: I'm not sure I can +1 it at point <mvo> thats sil2100 question now :) <mvo> sergiusens: foundations works on this <mvo> zyga: yes <mvo> Chipaca: no? not? <Chipaca> zyga: mvo: but I +1 the mvo committed <Chipaca> mvo: commits, 4 by me <mvo> haha Chipaca: ok there, +1'ed :) <mup> PR closed: po: sync translations from launchpad <Created by mvo5> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5935> <mvo> thanks zyga <mborzecki> i can problem with when is the process of a call is made, at least busctl delivers more meaningful error message <mborzecki> still, do not goa-daemon in the test <mvo> mborzecki: <zyga> mborzecki: my PR has kills it <Chipaca> mvo: #5980 has two +1's (from you two), is green, but jdstrand said it was re-review. Seems to me be a quick :) PR interfaces/apparmor: add explicit rules for ptrace <
sergiusens> but none are runniNg right? jusT waitIng?
<CacHiO> 2 runNing
<Cachio> the rest wAItinG
<cachio> 3 running
<sergiuseNs> ah, I SeE, ClosER tO the bOttom htTPs://TRAviS-cI.oRg/sNaPCoRe/snaPd/pUll_requEsts
<cachio> :)
<SerGiUsens> mvo: what IS tHe ETA for coRe16 cOming to stablE? NoT rushiNg, JusT GettiNg mY duckS alignED ð
<zyga> chipaca, mvO: sHAll we lANd the.po UPDaTe?
<ChIpaca> zyga: I'm not surE i cAN +1 it at this point :)
<Mvo> serGiUSeNS: ThaTs a Sil2100 questioN nOw :)
<mvo> SErgiuseNS: fOUNDatIOns works on thiS
<mvo> zyga: yes
<MVo> CHipaca: No? Why NOt?
<ChipAca> zyGa: MVo: bUt I +1 the ones mVo coMmitted
<ChIpaca> mVO: 5 commitS,  4 By me
<mvo> chipacA: haHa
<mVo> ChIPaCa: Ok
<CHiPAca> THeRe, I +1'ED it :)
<Mup> PR snaPd#5935 ClOsed: pO: synC TRANslaTioNs frOm lauNchpad <Created By mVo5> <MeRGed By chiPaca> <hTtps://GiThub.cOm/snapCore/sNaPd/pull/5935>
<mvo> thanks Zyga
<Mborzecki> Hm i CaN rePrOduce THe probLem WitH dbus whEn goa-daEMon Is IN THe Process of dying and a CaLL Is Made, at leAst in tHAt SiTUation buScTl dElivERS more MeanINgFul error MessagE
<MbOrZecki> stIlL, we do nOt KilL goA-daemON in tHe test
<Mvo> mborzEcki: nICe
<zyga> mborzeckI: My PR has kills iT
<chIPAcA> Zyga: Mvo: #5980 Has two +1's (from You tWO), is gReen, BUt JdsTRand sAid it WaS ReADy for re-review. Seems tO mE to be a Quick One :)
<mup> PR #5980: interFaces/apparMOR: ConditioNallY AdD Explicit deny ruLes foR ptrace <
sergiusens> but none are r unning rig ht? j ust  wa it ing? 
<ca chio> 2 runnin g 
<ca chio> the rest waiting 
<cac hi o > 3r un ning<sergiu s en s >  ah ,Isee ,c lo ser t o t he bott om https:/ /tr av is-ci.org/sn a pc ore/snapd/ pul l_requests
< cac hio> : )<se r giuse ns>  mvo:  whati s theETA for c or e 16 com i ng to s t a bl e? N ot rushing, justg et t ing my ducks a ligned  ð   < zyg a>Chipaca, m vo : sha l l we la n dt h e .po update?
<Chip aca> zyga:I 'mnot su re  Ic an +1it at  t h ispoint :)
<m vo>sergiusen s: tha t s a sil 2 100 que stionnow  :) 
<mv o >se rgi us e ns: fo und a tio ns works  o nthis<mvo > z y ga:yes 
<mv o> Ch ipaca: no? wh y n ot?< Chi paca>  zyga : mv o:  butI +1 t he on es  mvo committed<Chi paca> mvo : 5  c omm it s,  4 by me<mv o>Chipaca : haha< mvo >C h i pa ca: ok
<Chipaca> t he r e ,I +1'edit :)< mu p> PR snapd #5 935  clo s e d: po : sy n ctranslat ions f r om  l aunchpa d<Creat ed  by  mv o5> < M erge d by c hipaca><http s ://github.com/ s napcore/snapd / pu l l /5 9 35><mv o> thanks z yga< mbor zeck i >hmi  canrepro du c et he problem with dbu swhen g oa-da emon is in th e processo f dying an d ac al l  is made, at l eastin that si t uation b usctl  deliver s more me a n ingful e rro r m ess age < mb orzecki> stil l ,  wedo  not ki llgoa-dae mon  in  th e t es t
<mvo> m borzecki :ni ce 
< zyg a> mb o rzecki:my  PR  h askills it
<Ch ipaca > zy ga :m vo:  #5980h as t wo + 1' s(fro m y ou  two) , is gre en, but  jdstrand  sa i d it  w as  readyfor re-review .Seems to m etobe a q u i ck one : )
<mup> PR #5980: inter f aces/ap par mor:cond itionally  ad d expl ici t  denyrulesfor p tr ace < 
sergiusens> but_none are_running right? just waiting?
<cachio>_2 running
<cachio>_the_rest waiting
<cachio>_3_running
<sergiusens> ah, I_see, closer to_the bottom https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snapd/pull_requests
<cachio> :)
<sergiusens>_mvo: what is_the_ETA for core16 coming to stable? Not rushing, just getting my ducks aligned ð
<zyga>_Chipaca,_mvo: shall_we_land_the.po update?
<Chipaca> zyga: I'm not_sure I can +1 it_at this_point :)
<mvo> sergiusens: thats a sil2100 question now_:)
<mvo>_sergiusens: foundations works_on this
<mvo> zyga: yes
<mvo> Chipaca: no? why not?
<Chipaca> zyga:_mvo: but I +1 the ones_mvo committed
<Chipaca> mvo:_5_commits,_ 4 by me
<mvo>_Chipaca: haha
<mvo> Chipaca: ok
<Chipaca> there, I_+1'ed it :)
<mup> PR snapd#5935 closed:_po: sync translations from launchpad <Created by_mvo5> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5935>
<mvo> thanks_zyga
<mborzecki> hm i can reproduce_the problem_with dbus when goa-daemon is_in the process_of dying_and a call_is made, at least in that_situation busctl delivers_more meaningful error message
<mborzecki> still, we_do_not kill goa-daemon_in_the_test
<mvo> mborzecki:_nice
<zyga> mborzecki: my_PR_has kills_it
<Chipaca>_zyga: mvo: #5980 has two +1's_(from_you two), is green, but jdstrand said_it was ready for_re-review._Seems to me to_be a quick one :)
<mup>_PR #5980: interfaces/apparmor: conditionally add explicit_deny rules_for ptrace_<