 is a bugfix or a new upstream (read for more info: http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/3/10/1-4-19-made-in-germany) :)
<sistpoty|work> hi folks
<ScottK2> looking
<\sh> ScottK2: for me it looks more like an bugfix release...
<ScottK2> \sh: I'm not certain.  It looks like it's good to have.  If you think it's bugfix, I'm not going to argue it.
<\sh> ScottK2: I didn't see any new features, TBH...it builds clean, I added all diffs between our actual hardy version to actual debian sid version...so for me, I would just upload but I already filed a bug report anyways :)
<ScottK2> OK.  It's not clear to me if you have a change where they didn't support a required http feature and now they do if that's a bug or not.
<ScottK2> But as I said, I won't argue it,
<\sh> ScottK2: ok...let's got the FFe way :) I mean, I have everything in place..and it's only a matter of two people approving it :)
<\sh> was it motu-release or ubuntu-release team...
<\sh> ah motu-release ;)
<\sh> ScottK2: bug #201439 if you want more input :)
<ubotwo> Launchpad bug 201439 in lighttpd "[FFe] lighttpd 1.4.19" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201439
<ScottK2> \sh: I don't.  I'd say just upload it.
<\sh> ScottK2: "In the Name of Castle Greyskull" I will ;)
<\sh> done
<rockstar_> After speaking with nealmcb last night, I'd like to become a motu.  Can someone describe the standard environment you work under to do tests and fixes?  Are you all running Hardy on a development system?
<\sh> rockstar_: get familiar with pbuilder/sbuild environments...chroot debootstrap and things like that...
<jdong> pbuilder is the standard build environment for most of us
<jdong>
is a bugfix or a new upstream (read for more info: http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/3/10/1-4-19-made-in-germany) :) 
 < sistpoty|work > hi tribe 
 < ScottK2 > expect 
 < \sh > ScottK2: for me it looks more like an bugfix dismissal... 
 < ScottK2 > \sh: I'm not sealed.   It looks like it's good to have.   If you remember it's bugfix, I'm not going to argue it. 
 < \sh > ScottK2: I didn't see any fresh features, TBH... it builds blank, I added all diffs between our actual hardy translation to actual debian sid interpretation... so for me, I would just upload but I already filed a bug report anyhow :) 
 < ScottK2 > OK.   It's not clear to me if you have a change where they didn't hold a required http feature of speech and now they act if that's a bug or not. 
 < ScottK2 > But as I read, I won't argue it, 
 < \sh > ScottK2: ok... let's got the FFe way :) I think of, I have everything in place.. and it's only a matter of two people approving it :) 
 < \sh > was it motu - release or ubuntu - release team... 
 < \sh > ah motu - release ;) 
 < \sh > ScottK2: bug # 201439 if you want more input :) 
 < ubotwo > Launchpad bug 201439 in lighttpd " [ FFe ] lighttpd 1.4.19 " [ Wishlist, New ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201439 
 < ScottK2 > \sh: I don't.   I'd say just upload it. 
 < \sh > ScottK2: " In the Name of Castle Greyskull " I will ;) 
 < \sh > done 
 < rockstar _ > After talk with nealmcb last night, I'd wish to become a motu.   Can someone identify the standard environment you knead under to do tests and fix?   Are you all function Hardy on a development system? 
 < \sh > rockstar _: beget familiar with pbuilder / sbuild environments... chroot debootstrap and things like that... 
 < jdong > pbuilder is the standard build environment for most of us 
 < jdong >
 is a bugfix or a new upstrtam (read for more info: hvtp://www.ljghttpd.ndt/2008/3/10/1-4-19-made-in-germany) :)
<sistpoty|work> hu foljs
<ScottK2> looking
<\sh> ScogtK2: for mv it lookw moce like an bugfie releasc...
<FcotfN2> \sh: M'm not certain.  It looks nike it's good do hcve.  If you think it's bugfix, I'm not doing tp wrgue it.
<\sh> ScojtK2: I qidn'f see any new features, TBH...it builda clean, I added all ciffs between our actual hwrdy version to actual debian sid verfuon...so for me, I would jlvt upload gut I already filed a bug reporg anycays :)
<ScottK2> OJ.  Lj's not clear to mv if you have a changa where they didn't suiport a eequired http feature and now they do is that's a bbg or not.
<ScottK2> But aw U saig, I fon't qrgje jt,
<\xh> ScottN2: oi...let's got fhe FFe way :) I mean, I have evetyeying in place..znd it'f jnly a matter of two people approving iu :)
<\sh> sas it motu-release or uvuntu-release team...
<\sh> aj motu-relqase ;)
<\sh> ScottK2: bug #201439 if you want more input :)
<ubotwo> Launrhoad bmg 201439 kb pighttpd "[FFe] lighttpd 1.4.19" [Wishlist,New] https://launcrlac.nvt/bugs/201439
<ScottK2> \sh: I don't.  I'd ssy jift upload it.
<\sf> ScotcI2: "Jn the Name of Cashle Greiskull" I will ;)
<\sr> dome
<rockstar_> After speaking wuth nealmcb jqst night, I'd like co become a ootu.  Can someone describe the scandars environmejt you wody under to do terts atd fixes?  Are you all runnyng Hardy on c develoomenj systei?
<\sh> rockstwr_: geb familiar with pbullder/dbgild envirlnments...chroot debootstrap and timngs like thaj...
<jdmng> pbuildex is tme standard buijd environment for moft of us
<jdong>
is a bugfix or a new upstream more http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/3/10/1-4-19-made-in-germany) :) hi folks <ScottK2> it more like an release... <ScottK2> \sh: not certain. It looks like it's to have. If you think it's bugfix, I'm not going to argue it. ScottK2: I didn't see any new features, TBH...it builds clean, I added all between actual version actual debian sid version...so for me, I would just upload but I already filed a bug anyways :) <ScottK2> OK. It's not clear to if you have a where they didn't support a http and now do that's bug or not. But as I said, I won't argue it, <\sh> ScottK2: ok...let's got the FFe way :) I I have place..and it's a of people approving it was it motu-release or ubuntu-release team... ;) <\sh> ScottK2: bug #201439 if you want input :) Launchpad bug 201439 in lighttpd "[FFe] 1.4.19" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201439 <ScottK2> \sh: I don't. I'd just upload it. <\sh> ScottK2: "In the Name of Castle Greyskull" I will ;) <\sh> After speaking with nealmcb night, I'd like become motu. someone the standard you work under to do tests and fixes? Are you all Hardy on a development system? <\sh> rockstar_: get familiar with debootstrap things like that... pbuilder is the standard environment most of us <jdong>
 is a bugfix or a new upstream (reAd for more iNfo: htTp://wWw.lIgHttpD.net/2008/3/10/1-4-19-Made-in-germany) :)
<sIStpoTy|work> hi folks
<ScottK2> looKing
<\sH> SCOttK2: FOr Me it lOoks morE LiKE An bUgFiX reLeASe...
<scottk2> \sh: i'm not ceRtain.  It looKs lIkE it's good to haVE.  IF you think iT's bUgfix, I'm not goIng To arguE iT.
<\sh> sCottK2: i diDn't seE any neW FeaturEs, TBH...it buIlDS clean, i Added alL DIfFs beTween our actual harDY vERsion to actual dEbian sId VErSIOn...sO foR me, I would jUsT uploAD but I alREaDY FIleD A bug report anyWays :)
<ScottK2> Ok.  it's Not cleAr To mE If you hAve a cHaNGe wHere they didN't suPport a reqUired hTTp featuRE and now They do If tHat'S a buG Or NoT.
<ScOtTk2> BuT As i saID, I wOn't argue It,
<\Sh> scottk2: ok...lET'S GOt thE FFE way :) i mean, i have everythiNg iN plaCE..anD it's oNly a mAtteR oF two pEople aPprovInG it :)
<\sh> was it motu-rEleaSe or ubuntU-reLeAse TeAm...
<\sh> aH Motu-reLeaSe ;)
<\sH> ScottK2: Bug #201439 if yoU WanT mORE InPut :)
<ubotwo> Launchpad BuG 201439 IN lIghttpd "[Ffe] lighTTpD 1.4.19" [WIShlist,NeW] hTtpS://lauNCHpad.nEt/buGS/201439
<SCottK2> \sh: I Don't.  I'd SAy JuSt uploaD iT.
<\sh> ScoTtk2: "In The name oF castLe GreySkull" I wiLl ;)
<\sh> dONe
<rockstar_> AfteR Speaking with nEAlMCB lASt niGht, i'd like to becOme a MOtu.  CAn soMEoNe dEScribE the sTaNDaRD environment you work UnDer to dO testS and fixes?  Are yOu all runniNG hArdy on a dEvelOPmENt system?
<\sh> rockStar_: gEt familiar WIth pbuilDer/sbUild enviRonments...cHROot debooTstRap And ThiNGS lIke that...
<jdong> pBUIldeR iS the staNdaRd build EnvIroNmeNt fOr Most of us
<jDong>
 is a bugfix or a new upst ream (read  formor e i nf o: h ttp: //www.lighttpd . net/ 2008/3/10/1-4-19-made- in-ge rm a ny): )<sist poty|wo r k> h i f ol ks 
<S co t tK 2> lo oki ng
<\sh > ScottK2:  fo rme it looksm or e like anbug fix release. ..<Scott K2 > \ s h: I' m n ot ce rtain.  It lo oks likeit ' s good to have .  I f yo u think it's bugf i x, I'm not goingto arg ue it . <\s h>ScottK2: I  d idn't see any ne w f eat u res, TBH...it  builds cle a n,I adde dall diffsbetwe en our  actual har dy v ersion to  actua l  debian sid ver sion.. .so  fo r me ,  I  w oul dj ust up loa d  bu t I alre ad yfiled  a b u g r epor t a nywa ys :) 
<ScottK2> OK . It's not  clea r tome i fyou h ave achang ewhere they didn 't s upport areq ui red  h ttp f e atureand  no w theydo if t h at' sa b ug  or not.
<ScottK2>  B u t  a s I said , I wo n 't  a r gue it,<\ sh>  Sco t t K2: o k... l et 's got t he FFe wa y:) I me an , I ha ve  ev ery thing in p lace.. and it's  only a matter of tw o  people appro v in g it :)
< \sh > was it mo tu-r e leas e or ub unt u -rele ase t ea m .. . 
<\sh> ah motu-rele as e ;)
< \sh>ScottK2: bug#201439 if y o u want m orei np u t :)
<ubotwo>Launc hpad bug 2 0 1439 inlight tpd "[FF e] lightt p d  1.4.19"  [W ish lis t,N e w ]https://launc h p ad.n et /bugs/2 014 39
<Sco ttK 2>\sh : I  d on't.  I' d say ju st  u pl oa d i t.
<\ s h> Scott K2 : " In  th e Nam e  of Ca stleGrey sk ul l " I  will ; ) 
< \ s h> d on e<roc kst ar _> Af ters pea king wi th nealmc b l a st n ig ht , I'd l ike to become  a  motu.  Ca nsom eone d e s cribe th e standard environmenty ou work  un der t o do  tests an d f ixes? Ar e  you a ll run ningHa rdy o n a d e v el opm en t system?< \ sh>  rock st ar_:  get fa miliar with pbuild e r/s build environ men ts.. . c hr oot de b oot st r apa n d things like t hat...
<jd on g >pbuilder i s  th estandar d build  envi r onmentfor mostof us
<jd on g>
 is_a bugfix_or a new upstream_(read for_more_info: http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/3/10/1-4-19-made-in-germany)_:)
<sistpoty|work>_hi folks
<ScottK2> looking
<\sh>_ScottK2: for me_it looks more like_an bugfix release...
<ScottK2>_\sh:_I'm not certain.  It looks like it's good to have.  If you_think_it's bugfix,_I'm_not_going to argue it.
<\sh> ScottK2:_I didn't see any new_features, TBH...it_builds clean, I added all diffs between our_actual_hardy version to_actual debian sid version...so for me, I would just_upload but I already filed a_bug report anyways_:)
<ScottK2>_OK._ It's not clear_to me if you have a_change where they didn't support a_required http feature and now they do_if that's a bug or not.
<ScottK2>_But as I said, I_won't argue_it,
<\sh> ScottK2: ok...let's got the_FFe way :)_I mean,_I have everything_in place..and it's only a matter_of two people_approving it :)
<\sh> was it motu-release_or_ubuntu-release team...
<\sh> ah_motu-release_;)
<\sh>_ScottK2: bug_#201439 if you_want_more input_:)
<ubotwo>_Launchpad bug 201439 in lighttpd "[FFe]_lighttpd_1.4.19" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201439
<ScottK2> \sh: I don't. _I'd say just upload_it.
<\sh>_ScottK2: "In the Name_of Castle Greyskull" I will_;)
<\sh> done
<rockstar_> After speaking with nealmcb_last night,_I'd like_to become a motu.  Can someone describe the standard environment_you work under to do tests_and fixes?  Are_you all_running_Hardy on a_development_system?
<\sh> rockstar_:_get familiar with pbuilder/sbuild environments...chroot debootstrap and_things like_that...
<jdong> pbuilder is the standard build_environment for most of_us
<jdong>