r/lib/python*/*-packages/Qwt5/*
<savvas> site-packages is used for python versions 2.5 (or less up to some point :P)
<savvas> dist-packages is used by 2.6
<savvas> so *-packages grabs both :)
<cristi> savvas: i see, i wish i had more general knowledge about this matter
<cristi> modifief usr/lib/python*/site-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/* to usr/lib/python*/PyQt4/Qwt5/* is ok?
<cristi> or like this usr/lib/python*/-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<maxb> You're still missing a *
<cristi> ï»¿usr/lib/python*/*-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<cristi> maxb: is this ok?
<maxb> Assuming you've just changed "site" to "*", yes
<cristi> maxb: thank you
<savvas> cristi: all in time, I didn't know about this either a week ago :)
 * quadrispro working at Python 2.6 transition
<ScottK> apt-cache rdepends python2.5|grep -c "  "
<ScottK> = 119
<ScottK> Plenty more to do
<cristi> that's kind of good news for me, i have to get used with editing packages
<mrooney> ScottK: and those are just the packages that explicitly list their < 2.6 dependency :)
<maxb> And then there's the packages which install, but spew DeprecationWarnings :-)
<savvas> man, when dpatch is in build-depends it should fail to allow direct patches :P
<maxb> lintian will whine already :-)
<savvas> it does, but I just found a package with 3 files edited directly with dpatch installed :)
<ScottK> savvas: Were the direct edits done in Debian or Ubuntu?
<cristi> does this lintian error pose any problems? bad-ubuntu-distribution-in-changes-file jaunty
<nhandler> cristi: No, you can ignore that.
r / lib / python*/*-packages / Qwt5/ * 
 < savvas > site - packages is used for python versions 2.5 (or less up to some item :P) 
 < savvas > dist - software is used by 2.6 
 < savvas > so * -packages grabs both :) 
 < cristi > savvas: i witness, i wish i had more general cognition about this matter 
 < cristi > modifief usr / lib / python*/site - packages / PyQt4 / Qwt5/ * to usr / lib / python*/PyQt4 / Qwt5/ * is ok? 
 < cristi > or like this usr / lib / python*/-packages / PyQt4 / Qwt5/ * 
 < maxb > You're however missing a * 
 < cristi > ï»¿usr / lib / python*/*-packages / PyQt4 / Qwt5/ * 
 < cristi > maxb: is this ok? 
 < maxb > assume you've just changed " site " to " * ", yes 
 < cristi > maxb: thank you 
 < savvas > cristi: all in time, I didn't know about this either a week ago :) 
  * quadrispro ferment at Python 2.6 transition 
 < ScottK > apt - cache rdepends python2.5|grep -c "   " 
 < ScottK > = 119 
 < ScottK > enough more to do 
 < cristi > that's kind of good news program for me, i have to get use with editing packages 
 < mrooney > ScottK: and those are just the packages that explicitly list their < 2.6 dependency :) 
 < maxb > And then there's the software which install, but spew DeprecationWarnings :-) 
 < savvas > man, when dpatch is in build - depends it should fail to allow direct patches :P 
 < maxb > lintian will whine already :-) 
 < savvas > it does, but I just found a package with 3 files edited directly with dpatch installed :) 
 < ScottK > savvas: Were the direct edits done in Debian or Ubuntu? 
 < cristi > does this lintian mistake pose any problems? regretful - ubuntu - distribution - in - change - file jaunty 
 < nhandler > cristi: No, you can ignore that.
r/lih/python*/*-packages/Qwt5/*
<savvas> site-packages is used hor pytgon verskons 2.5 (or less up to some poiit :P)
<wavvaw> dist-packages is used by 2.6
<savvad> so *-pacjagew grabs boti :)
<cristi> savvaa: i sze, i wish i had kore generdl knowledge atojt this matter
<cristi> modifief usr/lib/prthon*/siye-oackages/PyQt4/Qwj5/* to lsw/lib/ljtmon*/PyQt4/Qwt5/* is ok?
<cristi> or like tgis usr/nib/python*/-packsges/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<maxb> You're stilp midsing a *
<cristi> ï»¿usr/pib/python*/*-paxkagqw/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<crisgi> maxb: is this ok?
<maxb> Assuming you've just changed "sige" to "*", yes
<cristu> naxh: thank you
<sevvas> bristi: all in time, I gidn't kmow about this eivher a week ago :)
 * quadris'ro working at Pythog 2.6 transidikn
<ScottK> apt-cache reepengs pfthov2.5|treo -c "  "
<SdottK> = 119
<SckttK> Plentg more to di
<cristi> that's kind pf tood news for me, i rade to get used with editing packages
<mromneg> ScottK: and those are hust the packages thaj explicitjy list their < 2.6 dependency :)
<maxb> And then there's tve parkxgew rfucj install, but spew DeprecationWarnings :-)
<savvas> jam, ehen dpatch is in build-delejdx it should fakl to cmlkw direct patches :O
<maxb> lyntiab will whyne slready :-)
<savvas> it does, but U just found q package with 3 fipes edited birectky wiyh dpatch installed :)
<ScoctK> sabvas: Were tje direct ddits done in Deciak os Ubuntu?
<cristi> does this lyntian ercor ppse any pronlems? fad-ubuntu-dlstringtion-in-changes-file jaunjy
<nhangler> cristl: No, you can ignore that.
r/lib/python*/*-packages/Qwt5/* <savvas> site-packages is used for python (or up to point :P) <savvas> <savvas> *-packages grabs both <cristi> savvas: i i wish i had more general about this matter <cristi> modifief usr/lib/python*/site-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/* to usr/lib/python*/PyQt4/Qwt5/* is ok? <cristi> or like usr/lib/python*/-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/* <maxb> You're still missing a * <cristi> ï»¿usr/lib/python*/*-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/* <cristi> maxb: is this <maxb> you've changed to "*", yes <cristi> maxb: thank you <savvas> cristi: all in time, I didn't know about either a week ago :) * quadrispro working Python 2.6 transition <ScottK> rdepends python2.5|grep -c " " = <ScottK> Plenty to <cristi> kind of good for me, i have to get used with editing packages <mrooney> ScottK: and those are just the that explicitly < 2.6 :) And there's the packages but spew DeprecationWarnings :-) <savvas> man, in build-depends it should fail to allow direct :P <maxb> will whine already :-) <savvas> it but I just found a package with 3 edited directly with dpatch installed :) <ScottK> savvas: Were the direct edits done in Debian <cristi> does this lintian pose any problems? jaunty cristi: you ignore that.
r/lib/python*/*-packages/Qwt5/*
<savvAs> site-packAges iS usEd fOr PythOn veRsions 2.5 (or less up TO somE point :P)
<savvas> dist-packaGes is UsED by 2.6
<sAVvAs> so *-pAckages GRaBS BotH :)
<cRiSti> SaVVaS: i see, I wiSh i had mOre general KnoWlEdge about thiS MaTter
<cristi> ModIfief usr/lib/pYthOn*/site-PaCkaGEs/PyQT4/QwT5/* to usR/lib/pyTHon*/PyQT4/Qwt5/* is ok?
<cRiSTi> or liKE this usR/LIb/PythOn*/-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<MAxB> you're still missIng a *
<crIsTI> ï»¿USR/liB/pyThon*/*-packagEs/pyQt4/QWT5/*
<cristi> MAxB: IS ThiS Ok?
<maxb> AssuminG you've just cHAngEd "site" To "*", Yes
<CRisti> mAxb: thAnK You
<Savvas> cristI: all In time, I diDn't knoW About thIS either A week aGo :)
 * qUadRispRO wOrKinG aT pytHOn 2.6 TraNSitIon
<Scottk> aPt-Cache RdepENDS PythOn2.5|gRep -c "  "
<scottk> = 119
<ScottK> Plenty MorE to dO
<CriSti> thAt's kiNd of GoOd newS for me, I have To Get used with editIng pAckages
<mrOonEy> scoTtk: and tHOse are JusT thE packagEs that eXPliCiTLY LiSt their < 2.6 dependency :)
<mAxB> aNd Then therE's the pACkAgES which inStAll, But sPEW DeprEcatIOnwarnings :-)
<Savvas> MAn, WhEn dpatcH iS in buiLd-DepEndS it shOUld fAil to aLlow direCt patCHes :P
<maxb> lintiaN Will whine alreADy :-)
<SAVvAS> it dOes, But I just fouNd a pACkagE witH 3 FiLes EDited DirecTlY WiTH dpatch installed :)
<ScoTtk> savvaS: Were The direct editS done in DebIAN Or Ubuntu?
<CrisTI> dOEs this lintian eRror pOse any probLEms? bad-ubUntu-dIstributIon-in-chanGES-file jauNty
<NhaNdlEr> cRIStI: No, you can ignoRE That.
r/lib/python*/*-packages/Q wt5/*
<sav vas>sit e-p ac kage s is  used for pyth o n ve rsions 2.5 (or less up  to s om e  poi n t:P)
< savvas> di s t -pa ck ag esis us ed by  2. 6
<savv as> so *-p ack ag es grabs bot h  : )
<cristi>  sa vvas: i see,  iwish i  h adm ore g ene ral k nowled g e abou t this ma tt e r
<cri s ti> mod i f ie f us r/lib/python*/sit e -p a ckages/PyQt4/Q wt5/*to us r / lib /py thon*/PyQt 4/ Qwt5/ *  is ok? <c r i s ti> or like thisusr/lib/pyt h on* /-pack ag es/ P yQt4/Q wt5/* 
< m axb > You're st illmissing a  *
<cr i sti> ï» ¿ usr/lib /pytho n*/ *-p acka g es /P yQt 4/ Q wt5 / *<cr i sti > maxb:is  t his o k?
< m a x b > As sum ingyou'v e just change d " site "  to  "*",  yes<cri st i> ma xb: th ank y ou 
<savvas> crist i: a ll in tim e,Idid n' t kno w  about  th iseithera weeka go:) *  q uadrispro workingat P yt hon 2.6transi t io n< ScottK>ap t-c ache r depen ds p y th on2.5|gr ep -c"  "<ScottK >= 119<S cot tK>  Plen t y mo re todo
<cris ti> t h at's kind of g o od news for m e ,i ha v e to  ge t used with  edi t ingpack a ge s
< m roone y> Sc ot t K: and those are justth e pack agesthat explicit ly list th e i r  < 2.6 d epen d en c y :)
<maxb> An d the n there'st he packa ges w hich ins tall, but s pew Depr eca tio nWa rni n g s:-)
<savvas>m a n, w he n dpatc h i s in bu ild -de pen dsit  should f ail to a ll ow  d ir ect  patc h es :P
<m ax b>li nti an wi l l whin e alr eady  : -) <sa vvas> i t  d o e s, b ut  I  jus t f ou nd apack a gewith 3files edi ted dire ct ly  with d patch install ed  :)
<Scott K>  sa vvas:W e re the d irect edits done in Deb i an or U bun tu?
< cris ti> doesthi s lint ian errorpose a ny pr ob lem s ?  bad- u b un tu- di stribution - i n-c hange s- file  jaunty 
<nhandler> cristi :  No , you can ign ore  tha t . 
r/lib/python*/*-packages/Qwt5/*
<savvas> site-packages_is used_for python versions 2.5_(or less_up_to some_point_:P)
<savvas> dist-packages is_used by 2.6
<savvas>_so *-packages grabs both_:)
<cristi> savvas: i_see,_i wish i had more general knowledge about this matter
<cristi> modifief usr/lib/python*/site-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/* to usr/lib/python*/PyQt4/Qwt5/*_is_ok?
<cristi> or_like_this_usr/lib/python*/-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<maxb> You're still missing a_*
<cristi> ï»¿usr/lib/python*/*-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5/*
<cristi> maxb: is this_ok?
<maxb> Assuming_you've just changed "site" to "*", yes
<cristi> maxb:_thank_you
<savvas> cristi: all_in time, I didn't know about this either a_week ago :)
 * quadrispro working_at Python 2.6_transition
<ScottK>_apt-cache_rdepends python2.5|grep -c "_ "
<ScottK> = 119
<ScottK> Plenty more_to do
<cristi> that's kind of good_news for me, i have to get_used with editing packages
<mrooney> ScottK: and_those are just the packages_that explicitly_list their < 2.6 dependency_:)
<maxb> And then_there's the_packages which install,_but spew DeprecationWarnings :-)
<savvas> man, when_dpatch is in_build-depends it should fail to allow_direct_patches :P
<maxb> lintian_will_whine_already :-)
<savvas>_it does, but_I_just found_a_package with 3 files edited directly_with_dpatch installed :)
<ScottK> savvas: Were the direct_edits done in Debian_or_Ubuntu?
<cristi> does this lintian_error pose any problems? bad-ubuntu-distribution-in-changes-file_jaunty
<nhandler> cristi: No, you can ignore_that.