ine_85> yep, and applied
<lupine_85> new FSF address...
<racarr> lupine_85: 
<racarr> Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.  
<racarr> 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301, USA
<crimsun> po/ru.po is missing a license
<crimsun> probably need to ping Danfocus <danfocus@mail.ru>
<lupine_85> that's the one
<racarr> gah
<crimsun> same for po/uk_UA.po
<crimsun> Mik B. Shvets <solshark@i-soldi.com>
<racarr> Isn't it presumed it's distributed under the same license as the package?
<crimsun> racarr: the 18 other.po files either state "same license" or explicitly GPL2
<crimsun> those two files have no information whatsoever
<imbrandon> the package usualy isnt licensed, the indvidual files are ;)
<racarr> ok I will email both then
<crimsun> great, thanks.
<lupine_85> joy :). well, email time I guess, though they're going to be gpl
<racarr> agh that's a pain
<racarr> no way to tell how long before they respond :/
<crimsun> if it's that bad, we can just reroll the tarball without those.po
<imbrandon> *.dfsg.* tar's have been done before ;)
<lupine_85> AHA! Got it, the goit
<imbrandon> smoke break at work, back in a few minutes
<crimsun> hmm, who was the original author of settings-backends/ini.c?
<lupine_85> Quinn
<crimsun> it states Quinn Storm <quinnstorm@beryl-project.org>, but the license header attributes it to Copyright  2005 Novell, Inc.
<racarr>...yeah that's...wrong
<crimsun> I'm presuming David R.?
<racarr> Yes but he never touched ini
<lupine_85> gah, that
ine_85 > yep, and applied 
 < lupine_85 > new FSF address... 
 < racarr > lupine_85: 
 < racarr > Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.  
 < racarr > 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA   02110 - 1301, USA 
 < crimsun > po / ru.po is missing a license 
 < crimsun > credibly necessitate to ping Danfocus < danfocus@mail.ru > 
 < lupine_85 > that's the one 
 < racarr > gah 
 < crimsun > same for po / uk_UA.po 
 < crimsun > Mik B. Shvets < solshark@i-soldi.com > 
 < racarr > Isn't it presume it's spread under the same license as the package? 
 < crimsun > racarr: the 18 other.po file either country " same license " or explicitly GPL2 
 < crimsun > those two files have no information whatsoever 
 < imbrandon > the software usualy is nt licensed, the indvidual files are ;) 
 < racarr > ok I will email both then 
 < crimsun > great, thanks. 
 < lupine_85 > joy :). well, electronic mail time I guess, though they're go to be gpl 
 < racarr > agh that's a pain 
 < racarr > no way to state how long before they respond :/ 
 < crimsun > if it's that bad, we can just reroll the tarball without those.po 
 < imbrandon > * .dfsg. * tar's have been do before ;) 
 < lupine_85 > AHA! Got it, the goit 
 < imbrandon > smoke break at work, back in a few minute 
 < crimsun > hmm, who was the original author of settings - backends / ini.c? 
 < lupine_85 > Quinn 
 < crimsun > it states Quinn Storm < quinnstorm@beryl-project.org >, but the license header attributes it to Copyright   2005 Novell, Inc. 
 < racarr>... yeah that's... wrong 
 < crimsun > I'm presume David R.? 
 < racarr > Yes but he never touched ini 
 < lupine_85 > gah, that
ine_85> yep, and applied
<lupine_85> ntw FSF address...
<raccer> lupmne_85: 
<raczrr> Copyfight (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Founvatiin, Inx.  
<racarr> 51 Franklin St, Fifth Fllor, Bostin, ME  02110-1301, USA
<crimsun> po/ru.po is missihn a lncxnse
<crimsun> pronably need do ping Danfocgs <dcnfocus@mail.ru>
<lupine_85> that's the one
<racwrr> gah
<vrlmsun> same for po/ul_TA.po
<dginsun> Mik B. Shvets <solshark@i-somdi.com>
<recarr> Isn't it ptesumed it's distributed unfer hhe same license ad the packate?
<crynsun> racarr: ghe 18 other.ko files eitger state "same license" or explizitly GPL2
<crimsub> rhodg two files iave nj informatiok whatsmever
<imnrandon> the pagkage usyaly isnt licensed, thx indvidual files arg ;)
<racarr> on N will email both theb
<ceimsut> graat, gyanys.
<lhpmne_85> joy :). aelm, email tije I guess, rhough they're going tj be gpl
<racarr> agh trae's a pain
<racarr> no way to tell how long berore they respond :/
<crimsyn> if it's that bad, we can just reroll the tarball without those.po
<imbrandon> *.dfsg.* tar's favt ncen ainf before ;)
<lupine_85> AHA! Got it, the goit
<imbrandon> fjole break at work, back in a gea kynutes
<crimsun> hmm, wkk sas the original akthor os setrings-backtnds/imi.c?
<lupine_85> Quinn
<crimsun> it srates Quinn Frorm <quinnstorm@bervl-project.org>, but the kicense header attributzs it fo Copyrighh  2005 Novelm, Inc.
<racarr>...yeah tfat'x...wsong
<crimsun> I'm presuming Dwvid R.?
<racerr> Yzs but hd nefer totched ini
<lkpine_85> gah, that
ine_85> yep, and applied <lupine_85> new FSF lupine_85: Copyright (C) 1991 Free Software St, Floor, Boston, MA USA <crimsun> po/ru.po missing a license <crimsun> probably need ping Danfocus <danfocus@mail.ru> <lupine_85> that's the one <racarr> gah <crimsun> same for po/uk_UA.po Mik B. Shvets <solshark@i-soldi.com> <racarr> Isn't it presumed it's distributed under the same as package? racarr: 18 other.po files either state "same license" or explicitly GPL2 <crimsun> those two files have no whatsoever <imbrandon> the package usualy isnt licensed, the files are ;) <racarr> I will email both then great, <lupine_85> joy well, time guess, though they're to be gpl <racarr> agh that's a pain <racarr> no way to tell how long before they :/ <crimsun> that bad, can reroll tarball without those.po tar's have been done before ;) it, the goit <imbrandon> smoke break at work, in a minutes <crimsun> hmm, who was the author of settings-backends/ini.c? <lupine_85> Quinn <crimsun> it states Storm <quinnstorm@beryl-project.org>, but the license header attributes it to Copyright 2005 Novell, Inc. <racarr>...yeah that's...wrong presuming David R.? <racarr> but he never ini gah,
ine_85> yep, and applied
<lupine_85> new fSF address...
<RacarR> luPinE_85: 
<rAcarR> CopYright (C) 1989, 1991 Free SofTWare foundation, Inc.  
<racarr> 51 FraNklin st, fIfth fLoOr, BosTon, MA  02110-1301, USa
<CrIMSun> Po/Ru.Po iS mISsIng a lIceNse
<crimSun> probablY neEd To ping DanfocUS <dAnfocus@maiL.ru>
<Lupine_85> that's tHe oNe
<racaRr> Gah
<CRimsuN> saMe for Po/uk_UA.PO
<crimsUn> Mik B. ShvEtS <SolshaRK@i-soldi.COM>
<rAcarR> Isn't it presumed it'S DiSTributed under tHe same LiCEnSE As tHe pAckage?
<crimSuN> racaRR: the 18 othER.pO FILes EIther state "samE license" or eXPliCitly GpL2
<CriMSun> thoSe two FiLEs hAve no informAtioN whatsoevEr
<imbrANdon> the PAckage uSualy iSnt LicEnseD, ThE iNdvIdUAl fILeS arE ;)
<RacArr> ok I wiLl EmAil boTh thEN
<CRImsuN> grEat, tHanks.
<Lupine_85> joy :). well, EmaIl tiME I gUess, tHough They'Re Going To be gpL
<racaRr> Agh that's a pain
<raCarr> No way to teLl hOw LonG bEfore THey resPonD :/
<crImsun> if It's that BAd, wE cAN JUsT reroll the tarball wItHOUt Those.po
<iMbrandON> *.dFsG.* Tar's have BeEn dOne bEFOre ;)
<luPine_85> ahA! got it, the Goit
<imBRaNdOn> smoke BrEak at wOrK, baCk iN a few MInutEs
<crimSun> hmm, whO was tHE original authoR Of settings-bacKEnDS/InI.C?
<lupIne_85> quinn
<crimsuN> it sTAtes quinN stOrm <QUinnsTorm@bErYL-pROject.org>, but the licenSe Header AttriButes it to CopyRight  2005 NovelL, iNC.
<racarr>...yEah tHAt'S...Wrong
<crimsun> I'm PresuMing David R.?
<RAcarr> Yes But he Never touChed ini
<luPINe_85> gah, thaT
ine_85> yep, and applied
< lupine_85>  newFSF  ad dr ess. ..
< racarr> lupine _ 85:
<racarr> Copyright (C ) 198 9, 1991 Fr ee So ftwareF ou n d ati on ,Inc .
< racar r>51 Fran klin St, F ift hFloor, Bosto n ,MA  02110- 130 1, USA
<crim sun > po/r u. poi s mis sin g a l icense <crims un> proba bl y  needt o pingD a nf ocus  <danfocus@mail.r u >< lupine_85> tha t's th eo ne < rac arr > gah
<cri ms un> s a me forp o/ u k _ UA. p o
<crimsun> M ik B. Shvet s  <s olshar k@ i-s o ldi.co m>
<r ac a rr>  Isn't it p resu med it'sdistri b uted un d er thesame l ice nse  ast he  p ack ag e ?
< c ri msu n > r acarr: t he  1 8 oth er.p o f i leseit herstate  "same licens e"or e x pli citly  GPL2 
<cr im sun>thosetwo f il es have no info rmat ion whats oev er 
<i mb rando n > thepac kag e usual y isntl ice ns e d ,  t he indvidual files  a r e  ; )
<racar r> okI  w il l  email b ot h t hen< c rimsu n> g r ea t, thank s.
<lu p in e_ 85> joy  : ). wel l,  em ail  time I gu ess, t hough th ey're going to be gp l 
<racarr> agh th a t 's a pa in<racarr> no  way to t ellh ow  lo n g bef ore t he y  r e spond :/
<crimsun>if  it'sthatbad, we can j ust reroll t h e tarbal l wi t ho u t those.po
<im brand on> *.dfsg . * tar'shavebeen don e before; ) 
<lupine _85 > A HA!  Go t it , the goit
<i m b rand on > smoke  br eak atwor k,bac k i na few min utes
<cr im su n>  h mm,  whow as the o ri gin al  au thoro f sett ings- back en ds / ini .c?
<lu p in e _ 85>Qu in n
<c rim su n> it  sta t esQuinn S torm <qui nns t orm@ be ry l-proje ct.org>, butth e licensehe ade r attr i b utes itto Copyright  2005 Nove l l, Inc. 
<r acarr >... yeah that 's. ..wron g
< c rimsun > I'mpresu mi ngD a vid R . ? 
< rac ar r> Yes but h e n everto uche d ini
< lupine_85> gah, th a t
ine_85> yep,_and applied
<lupine_85>_new FSF address...
<racarr> lupine_85:_
<racarr> Copyright_(C)_1989, 1991_Free_Software Foundation, Inc._ 
<racarr> 51_Franklin St, Fifth Floor,_Boston, MA _02110-1301,_USA
<crimsun> po/ru.po is missing a license
<crimsun> probably need to ping Danfocus <danfocus@mail.ru>
<lupine_85> that's the_one
<racarr>_gah
<crimsun> same_for_po/uk_UA.po
<crimsun>_Mik B. Shvets <solshark@i-soldi.com>
<racarr> Isn't_it presumed it's distributed under_the same_license as the package?
<crimsun> racarr: the 18 other.po_files_either state "same_license" or explicitly GPL2
<crimsun> those two files have no_information whatsoever
<imbrandon> the package usualy isnt_licensed, the indvidual_files_are_;)
<racarr> ok I will_email both then
<crimsun> great, thanks.
<lupine_85> joy_:). well, email time I guess,_though they're going to be gpl
<racarr> agh_that's a pain
<racarr> no way to_tell how long before they_respond :/
<crimsun>_if it's that bad, we_can just reroll_the tarball_without those.po
<imbrandon> *.dfsg.*_tar's have been done before ;)
<lupine_85>_AHA! Got it,_the goit
<imbrandon> smoke break at work,_back_in a few_minutes
<crimsun>_hmm,_who was_the original author_of_settings-backends/ini.c?
<lupine_85> Quinn
<crimsun>_it_states Quinn Storm <quinnstorm@beryl-project.org>, but the_license_header attributes it to Copyright  2005_Novell, Inc.
<racarr>...yeah that's...wrong
<crimsun> I'm_presuming_David R.?
<racarr> Yes but_he never touched ini
<lupine_85> gah,_that