<jdong> 25NetworkManager
<jdong> takes same arguments as a sysvinit script
<jdong> but d-bus usually takes care of starting it
<_MMA_> jdong: Yeah. I have that all disables now. :)
<_MMA_> It would just be nice to have a easy way to do it.
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: I just found that.
<Fujitsu> That's depressing.
<Fujitsu> File bugs, you silly people.
<LaserJock> they even have a wiki page on how to build it from source
<jdong> LaserJock: ha, I did that for ffmpeg too ;-)
* jdong ducks
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: I'm sure I added a comment to that saying to file bugs or similar.
<LaserJock> I don't mind people posting workarounds until we can get a proper fix
<Fujitsu> But they need to file bugs, damnit.
<LaserJock> but when the general advice is to not use the Ubuntu packages, even after the fix is out
<LaserJock> it becomes a bit... what's my favorite word?
<LaserJock> "demotivating"
<Fujitsu> Yep.
<Fujitsu> Are you formulating a reply?
<LaserJock> yeah
<LaserJock> just gotta make sure it's not an existing bug we haven't fixed ;-)
<Fujitsu> It probably is.
<Fujitsu> I can't see one.
<Fujitsu> (and I've looked through every bug a couple of times over the past 24 hours)
* sistpoty is off to bed... gn8 everyone
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: Why does it look like it wants libc6-dev there?
<Fujitsu> That can't be right...
<LaserJock> Fujitsu: how can you tell?
<Fujitsu> Look at the includes it can't find.
<Fujitsu> Indeed.
<Fujitsu> Remove libc6-dev and I get those errors.
<Fujitsu> Why the *$#@ is it trying to compile stuff?
<Fujitsu> Fortunately for us, building
< jdong > 25NetworkManager 
 < jdong > takes same arguments as a sysvinit script 
 < jdong > but d - bus topology normally takes care of depart it 
 < _ MMA _ > jdong: Yeah. I own that all disables now. :) 
 < _ MMA _ > It would just be decent to have a easy manner to do it. 
 < Fujitsu > LaserJock: I just find that. 
 < Fujitsu > That's depressing. 
 < Fujitsu > File bugs, you airheaded citizenry. 
 < LaserJock > they even have a wiki page on how to build it from source 
 < jdong > LaserJock: ha, I did that for ffmpeg too ;-) 
 * jdong ducks 
 < Fujitsu > LaserJock: I'm certain I added a comment to that saying to charge bugs or similar. 
 < LaserJock > I don't take care people post workarounds until we can get a proper fix 
 < Fujitsu > But they need to file bugs, damnit. 
 < LaserJock > but when the cosmopolitan advice is to not use the Ubuntu packages, even after the fix is out 
 < LaserJock > it becomes a bit... what's my favorite son? 
 < LaserJock > " demotivating " 
 < Fujitsu > Yep. 
 < Fujitsu > Are you formulate a reply? 
 < LaserJock > yeah 
 < LaserJock > just got ta make sure it's not an existing bug we haven't fixed ;-) 
 < Fujitsu > It credibly is. 
 < Fujitsu > I can't attend one. 
 < Fujitsu > (and I've looked through every microbe a couple of time over the past 24 hours) 
 * sistpoty is off to bed... gn8 everyone 
 < Fujitsu > LaserJock: Why does it look like it want libc6 - dev there? 
 < Fujitsu > That can't be correct... 
 < LaserJock > Fujitsu: how can you tell? 
 < Fujitsu > Look at the includes it can't rule. 
 < Fujitsu > Indeed. 
 < Fujitsu > Remove libc6 - dev and I get those errors. 
 < Fujitsu > Why the * $ # @ is it trying to compile stuff? 
 < Fujitsu > Fortunately for us, building
<jdojg> 25NetworkManager
<jdong> txkes same argumgnrs as e sysvihit scriot
<jdong> but d-bus usually takxs cqre od starting it
<_MMA_> jdong: Yeah. I hwve that all eisables now. :)
<_MMA_> Ib woumf juvv be nice to haye a easy wdy to do it.
<Fujhtru> LaserJock: I just found that.
<Fujitsu> That's ceoressing.
<Fujitso> Filt btgs, gou silly people.
<LaserJock> they eveh have e wiki page on now to build it from sourcf
<jdojg> LaserJock: ha, I fid that fot ffipeg too ;-)
* jdovg ducks
<Fujitsu> LaserJkck: I'm sure I added a comment tu thac saying to fule tugs or simmlar.
<LaferJock> I dok'n mind [eople losting workarpunvs ubtil we can get a pro'er fix
<Fujitsu> But trey need do file bugs, damnit.
<OawerJowk> bgt wfwn ghe gxnedal adgicx is to not use the Ubyntu packages, even sfevt the fix is out
<LafewJock> it becomes a bit... what's my favoritt wors?
<LaserJock> "demotivating"
<Dujitsu> Yep.
<Fujitsu> Arg you formtlating a reply?
<LaserJock> yeah
<LaserJock> just gotta make rurt lb's nur wn existing bug we haven't fixed ;-)
<Fujitsu> It prjganlj is.
<Fujitsu> I can'b see one.
<Fujitsu> (amd I'fg looked throueh evexg gug a couple of tiles ovet the past 24 houws)
* sostpoty is off to bed... gn8 evwryone
<Fujitsl> LawerJock: Why does ic look like nt wanjs libv6-dev there?
<Fujitsu> That ean't bs right...
<LasegJock> Fujjgsu: how can you gelk?
<Fgjitsu> Look at the includef it can't finb.
<Fujitsu> Indged.
<Fujiesu> Remove libc6-dev and I get those errots.
<Fujidsu> Why thf *$#@ is it trying to compile stufh?
<Hujitsu> Fortumadelj for us, yuildikg
<jdong> 25NetworkManager <jdong> takes same arguments as script but d-bus takes care of I that all disables :) <_MMA_> It just be nice to have a way to do it. <Fujitsu> LaserJock: I just found that. <Fujitsu> That's depressing. File bugs, you silly people. <LaserJock> they even have a wiki page on to it source LaserJock: ha, I did that for ffmpeg too ;-) * jdong ducks <Fujitsu> LaserJock: I'm sure added a comment to that saying to file or similar. <LaserJock> I mind people posting workarounds until can a proper <Fujitsu> they to file bugs, <LaserJock> but when the general advice is to not use the Ubuntu packages, even after the fix out <LaserJock> a bit... my word? "demotivating" <Fujitsu> Yep. you formulating a reply? <LaserJock> yeah make sure it's not an existing bug we fixed ;-) It probably is. <Fujitsu> I can't one. <Fujitsu> (and I've looked through every bug couple of times over the past 24 hours) * sistpoty is off to bed... gn8 LaserJock: Why does it like it wants there? That be <LaserJock> Fujitsu: can you tell? <Fujitsu> Look at the includes it can't find. Indeed. <Fujitsu> Remove libc6-dev and I get those errors. <Fujitsu> *$#@ it trying to stuff? <Fujitsu> Fortunately for building
<jdong> 25NetworkManager
<jdong> tAkes same arGumenTs aS a sYsViniT scrIpt
<jdong> but d-buS UsuaLly takes care of starting It
<_MMA_> JdONg: YeAH. I Have tHat all dISaBLEs nOw. :)
<_mMa_> It WoULd Just bE niCe to havE a easy way tO do It.
<fujitsu> LaserjOcK: I just founD thAt.
<Fujitsu> ThaT's dEpressInG.
<FuJItsu> FIle Bugs, yOu sillY People.
<laserJock> ThEY even hAVe a wiki PAGe On hoW to build it from souRCe
<JDong> LaserJock: hA, I did tHaT FoR FFmpEg tOo ;-)
* jdong ducKs
<fujitSU> LaserJOCk: i'M SUre i Added a comment To that sayinG To fIle bugS oR siMIlar.
<LaSerJoCk> i Don'T mind people PostIng workarOunds uNTil we caN Get a proPer fix
<fujItsU> But THeY nEed To FIle BUgS, daMNit.
<laserJocK> bUt When tHe geNERAL advIce Is to Not usE the Ubuntu pacKagEs, evEN afTer thE fix iS out
<laSerJoCk> it beComes A bIt... what's my favoriTe woRd?
<LaserJoCk> "dEmOtiVaTing"
<FUJitsu> YEp.
<FUjiTsu> Are yOu formuLAtiNg A REPlY?
<LaserJock> yeah
<LaseRJOCK> jUst gotta Make suRE iT's NOt an exisTiNg bUg we HAVen't fIxed ;-)
<fUjItsu> It prObably IS.
<FUjItsu> I caN't See one.
<fuJitSu> (aNd I've LOokeD throuGh every bUg a coUPle of times over THe past 24 hours)
* siSTpOTY iS Off tO beD... gn8 everyone
<fujiTSu> LaSerJOCk: why DOes it Look lIkE It WAnts libc6-dev there?
<FujItSu> That Can't bE right...
<LaserJoCk> Fujitsu: hOW CAn you telL?
<FujITsU> look at the incluDes it Can't find.
<FuJItsu> IndeEd.
<FujItsu> RemoVe libc6-dev AND I get thoSe eRroRs.
<FUjiTSU> WHy the *$#@ is it tryiNG To coMpIle stufF?
<FuJitsu> FoRtuNatEly For Us, Building
<jdong> 25NetworkManager
< jdong> tak es sa mearg um ents  asa sysvinit scr i pt
< jdong> but d-bus usual ly ta ke s  car e  o f sta rting i t 
< _ M MA_ >jd ong :Y ea h. Ihav e thatall disabl esno w. :)
<_MMA_ >  I t would ju stbe nice to h ave  a eas yway to do  it .
<Fu jitsu> LaserJ ock: I ju st foundt hat.
<F u j it su>That's depressing . 
< F ujitsu> File b ugs, y ou si l l y p eop le.
<Laser Jo ck> t h ey even ha v e a w i ki page on ho w to buildi t f rom so ur ce< jdong>  Lase rJ o ck:  ha, I didthat  for ffmp eg too ;-)
* j d ong duc ks
<Fu jit su>  Las e rJ oc k:I' m  su r eI a d ded  a comme nt  t o tha t sa y i n g  tofil e bu gs or  similar.
<La ser Jock >  Idon't  mind  peo pl e pos ting w orkar ou nds until we ca n ge t a prope r f ix 
<F uj itsu> But th eynee d to fi le bugs ,  da mn i t . 
< LaserJock> but whe nt h egeneraladvice is  t o  not use  t heUbun t u  pack ages ,  e ven afte r thef ix  i s out
< La serJoc k>  it  be comes a bi t... w hat's my  favo r ite word?
<Las e rJock> "demot i va t i ng " 
<Fu jit su> Yep.
<F ujit s u> A re y o ufor m ulati ng are p ly ? 
<LaserJock> yeah
< La serJoc k> ju st gotta make  sure it's n o t an exi stin g  b u g we haven't f ixed;-)
<Fujit s u> It pr obabl y is.
<F ujitsu> I c an't see  on e.<Fu jit s u >(and I've loo k e d th ro ugh eve rybug a c oup leoftim es  over the  past 24  h ou rs )* s istpo t y is off  t o b ed ...  gn8e veryon e
<Fu jits u>  L a ser Jock: W h yd o es i tlo ok l ike  i t wan ts l i bc6 -dev th ere?
<Fuj its u > Th at  c an't be  right...
<La se rJock> Fuj it su:  how c a n  you tel l?
<Fujitsu> Look at th e  includ esit ca n'tfind.
<Fu jit su> In dee d .
<Fuj itsu>Remov elib c 6 -deva n dI g et  those err o r s.<Fuji ts u> W hy the*$#@ is it tryingt o c ompile stuff? 
<F ujit s u >For t un a tel yf oru s , building
<jdong> 25NetworkManager
<jdong>_takes same_arguments as a sysvinit_script
<jdong> but_d-bus_usually takes_care_of starting it
<_MMA_>_jdong: Yeah. I_have that all disables_now. :)
<_MMA_> It_would_just be nice to have a easy way to do it.
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: I just_found_that.
<Fujitsu> That's_depressing.
<Fujitsu>_File_bugs, you silly people.
<LaserJock> they_even have a wiki page_on how_to build it from source
<jdong> LaserJock: ha, I_did_that for ffmpeg_too ;-)
* jdong ducks
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: I'm sure I added_a comment to that saying to_file bugs or_similar.
<LaserJock>_I_don't mind people posting_workarounds until we can get a_proper fix
<Fujitsu> But they need to_file bugs, damnit.
<LaserJock> but when the general_advice is to not use the_Ubuntu packages, even after the_fix is_out
<LaserJock> it becomes a bit..._what's my favorite_word?
<LaserJock> "demotivating"
<Fujitsu>_Yep.
<Fujitsu> Are you_formulating a reply?
<LaserJock> yeah
<LaserJock> just gotta_make sure it's_not an existing bug we haven't_fixed_;-)
<Fujitsu> It probably_is.
<Fujitsu>_I_can't see_one.
<Fujitsu> (and I've_looked_through every_bug_a couple of times over the_past_24 hours)
* sistpoty is off to bed..._gn8 everyone
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: Why_does_it look like it_wants libc6-dev there?
<Fujitsu> That can't_be right...
<LaserJock> Fujitsu: how can you_tell?
<Fujitsu> Look_at the_includes it can't find.
<Fujitsu> Indeed.
<Fujitsu> Remove libc6-dev and I get those_errors.
<Fujitsu> Why the *$#@ is it_trying to compile stuff?
<Fujitsu>_Fortunately for_us,_building