: I'm part of the launchpad group, changelog has "feisty; urgency=low", I'm doing dput -f iolanguage_20070226-1_source.changes
<bmm_> Hobbsee: the -f was because I first got a rejection for "unstable; urgency=low"
<LaserJock> I'm just trying to figure out how we are going to get useful packages to people 2-3 months after Feisty is released
<Hobbsee> fine, so say it doesnt go in at all, until the libfreeze is hit - but then we cant put in new packages at all
<LaserJock> exactly
<Hobbsee> bmm_: you need to include revu in there
<Hobbsee> so, we just say "you want kde4, too bad, move to feisty+1"
<LaserJock> but we can't/shouln't put in new upstream versions even if the packages do exist
<Hobbsee> which also seems like a crap solution
<bmm_> Hobbsee: ooh.. ok. I'll fix that...
<Fujitsu> Hobbsee: No, we say `use the kubuntu.org repos for Feisty'
<LaserJock> Hobbsee: no, I thought that's what Riddell's repo was for
<Hobbsee> (which is what the KC discussed, incidently)
<bmm_> Hobbsee: thanks!
<Hobbsee> Fujitsu: they're treated the same as universe, or almost the same.
<LaserJock> Hobbsee: I totally think those packages need to be available, but given our freezes and SRU processes it doesn't seem like the best place, IMO
<Hobbsee> quite true.
<Hobbsee> still, there's no perfect place, and i'm not sure where the best place would be.
<LaserJock> Riddell's repo is no good?
<LaserJock> I usually get stuff from there
<Hobbsee> LaserJock: it's i386 only, and riddell's the only one who has access to it.
<LaserJock> if I want latest KDE packages
<Hobbsee> (to the website at all)
<Hobbsee> afaik, non-canonical employees cant get access to update it?

: I'm part of the launchpad group, changelog has " feisty; urgency = depleted ", I'm do dput -f iolanguage_20070226-1_source.changes 
 < bmm _ > Hobbsee: the -f was because I first got a rejection for " unstable; importunity = low " 
 < LaserJock > I'm just trying to calculate out how we are going to get utilitarian software to people 2 - 3 month after Feisty is released 
 < Hobbsee > fine, so pronounce it does nt run in at all, until the libfreeze is hit - but then we ca nt put in fresh packages at all 
 < LaserJock > exactly 
 < Hobbsee > bmm _: you want to include revu in there 
 < Hobbsee > so, we just say " you desire kde4, too regretful, move to feisty+1 " 
 < LaserJock > but we can't / shouln't put in new upstream versions even if the package do exist 
 < Hobbsee > which also seems like a crap solution 
 < bmm _ > Hobbsee: ooh.. ok. I'll fix that... 
 < Fujitsu > Hobbsee: No, we say 'practice the kubuntu.org repos for Feisty' 
 < LaserJock > Hobbsee: no, I think that's what Riddell's repo was for 
 < Hobbsee > (which is what the KC discussed, incidently) 
 < bmm _ > Hobbsee: thanks! 
 < Hobbsee > Fujitsu: they're treated the same as universe, or almost the same. 
 < LaserJock > Hobbsee: I totally think those packages necessitate to be available, but given our freezes and SRU summons it doesn't appear like the best place, IMO 
 < Hobbsee > quite genuine. 
 < Hobbsee > still, there's no perfect place, and i'm not sure where the estimable place would be. 
 < LaserJock > Riddell's repo is no good? 
 < LaserJock > I usually get material from there 
 < Hobbsee > LaserJock: it's i386 only, and riddell's the only one who has access to it. 
 < LaserJock > if I want latest KDE packages 
 < Hobbsee > (to the web site at wholly) 
 < Hobbsee > afaik, non - basic employees ca nt get access to update it?
: I'm part of the launchpad gvoup, changelog hcw "feisvy; urgehcy=low", I'o doing dput -f iolanguage_20070226-1_soucce.cyangew
<bmm_> Hobbsee: the -f was because P first git a eejection hkr "unstable; udnency=niw"
<LaserJock> I'm just tryitg to figure ogt hlw we are going to get useful packades to lelple 2-3 months aster Seisfj ls released
<Hobbsee> fine, so say if doesnu go in at all, untol the libfreeze is hit - bkt tjen we cant put in new packagga ae all
<LaserJocy> exactly
<Hobbsee> bmm_: yku need to include revu in therd
<Hobbxee> so, we huwt ddy "you want kde4, noo bad, move bp feisdy+1"
<LaserKock> but we cak't/shonln't put in new upstream tersions even if the packages dk exist
<Hobbsee> whucy alsm seams uuke a drep aolutiln
<bjm_> Hobbsee: ooh.. ok. I'll fix that...
<Fujitsu> Honbfvr: No, we say `hse thq hubuntu.org repos for Feisty'
<LaserJock> Hotbsse: no, I thought that's wyat Riddell's repo was for
<Hobbsqe> (which is what the KC discussed, incidently)
<bmm_> Hmbbsex: ghaujs!
<Hobcwef> Fujitsu: they're treated the same as universe, kr akmost the same.
<JaserJock> Hpbhsrg: I totally thknk those packages need to he avaijable, but giveg out freezes and SRU processes it doesn't svem oike the best placz, IMO
<Hobbsee> quije trur.
<Hobbsee> still, there's nu pedfect place, and i'm nkg sure where the bext place would be.
<LaserJock> Ryddell's rxpo ix no goud?
<LaxerJoch> I usuallj get stuff from there
<Hohbsee> LdserJock: ih's i386 only, and riddell's the only one who has avcass to it.
<LaferJogk> if I want laeest KDE packayes
<Hobbsze> (to ghe websitv at all)
<Hmbbsee> afaih, non-canonican employees cent get ascesw to update kt?

: I'm part of the launchpad group, "feisty; I'm doing -f iolanguage_20070226-1_source.changes <bmm_> I got a rejection "unstable; urgency=low" <LaserJock> just trying to figure out how are going to get useful packages to people 2-3 months after Feisty is <Hobbsee> fine, so say it doesnt go in at all, until the libfreeze hit but we put in new packages at all <LaserJock> exactly <Hobbsee> bmm_: you need to include revu in <Hobbsee> so, we just say "you want kde4, bad, move to feisty+1" but we can't/shouln't put in upstream even if packages exist which also seems a crap solution <bmm_> Hobbsee: ooh.. ok. I'll fix that... <Fujitsu> Hobbsee: No, we say `use the repos for Hobbsee: no, thought what repo was for is what the KC discussed, incidently) <Hobbsee> Fujitsu: they're treated the same as universe, almost the <LaserJock> Hobbsee: I totally think those need to be available, but given our freezes SRU processes it doesn't seem like the best place, IMO <Hobbsee> quite true. <Hobbsee> still, perfect place, and i'm sure where the place be. Riddell's is no <LaserJock> I usually get stuff from there <Hobbsee> LaserJock: it's i386 and riddell's the only one who has access to it. I latest KDE packages (to the website at <Hobbsee> non-canonical employees cant get update
: I'm part of the launchpad group, Changelog hAs "feiSty; UrgEnCy=loW", I'm dOing dput -f iolanGUage_20070226-1_Source.changes
<bmm_> HobbseE: the -f WaS BecaUSe i firsT got a reJEcTIOn fOr "UnStaBlE; UrGency=Low"
<laserJoCk> I'm just trYinG tO figure out hoW We Are going to Get Useful packagEs tO peoplE 2-3 mOntHS afteR FeIsty iS releaSEd
<HobbSee> fine, so SaY It doesNT go in at ALL, uNtil The libfreeze is hit - BUt THen we cant put in New pacKaGEs AT All
<lasErJock> exacTlY
<HobbSEe> bmm_: yoU NeED TO inCLude revu in theRe
<Hobbsee> so, WE juSt say "yOu WanT Kde4, too Bad, moVe TO feIsty+1"
<LaserJoCk> buT we can't/shOuln't pUT in new uPStream vErsionS evEn iF the PAcKaGes Do EXisT
<hoBbsEE> whIch also sEeMs Like a Crap SOLUTion
<Bmm_> hobbSee: ooH.. ok. I'll fix that...
<fujItsu> hObbSee: No, We say `Use tHe KubunTu.org rEpos fOr feisty'
<LaserJock> hobbSee: no, I thoUghT tHat'S wHat RiDDell's rEpo Was For
<HobbSee> (whicH Is wHaT THE Kc discussed, incidentLy)
<BMM_> HObbsee: thAnks!
<HoBBsEe> fUjitsu: thEy'Re tReatED The saMe as UNiVerse, or aLmost tHE sAmE.
<LaserJOcK> HobbsEe: i toTalLy thiNK thoSe packAges need To be aVAilable, but giveN Our freezes and srU PROcESses It dOesn't seem liKe thE Best PlacE, iMo
<HoBBsee> qUite tRuE.
<hoBBsee> still, there's no peRfEct plaCe, and I'm not sure wherE the best plACE Would be.
<LAserjOcK> riddell's repo is No gooD?
<LaserJock> i Usually gEt stuFf from thEre
<HobbseE> lAserJock: It's I386 onLy, aNd rIDDeLl's the only one WHO has AcCess to iT.
<LaSerJock> If I WanT laTesT KdE packageS
<Hobbsee> (To ThE wEbSitE at alL)
<hobbsee> aFaIk, nOn-CanOnicaL EmployEes caNt geT aCcESs tO update IT?

: I'm part of the launchpa d group, c hange log  ha s"fei sty;  urgency=low", I'mdoing dput -f iolangua ge_20 07 0 226- 1 _s ource .change s 
< b m m_>  H ob bse e: th e -fwas  becaus e I firstgot  a  rejection f o r"unstable;  ur gency=low"
< Las erJock >I'm justtry ing t o figu r e outhow we ar eg oing t o  get us e f ul  pac kages to people 2 - 3m onths after Fe isty i sr el e a sed 
<H obbsee> fi ne , sos ay it d o es n t goi n at all, unt il the libf r eez e is h it  -b ut the n weca n t p ut in new p acka ges at al l
<Las e rJock>e xactly<Hobbs ee>  bm m_:y ou  n eed  t o  in c lu der evu  in ther e<H obbse e> s o , w e ju stsay"youwant kde4, to o b ad,m ove  to f eisty +1"<L aserJ ock> b ut we  c an't/shouln't p ut i n new ups tre am  ve rs ionse ven if  th e p ackages  do exi s t
< Ho b b s ee > which also seems  l i k ea crap s olutio n 
< bm m _> Hobbs ee : o oh.. o k. I' ll f i xthat...<Fujit s u>  H obbsee:  N o, wesa y ` use  thek ubun tu.org  repos f or Fe i sty'
<LaserJoc k > Hobbsee: no ,  I t ho u ghttha t's what Ri ddel l 's r epow as  fo r 
<Hob bsee>  ( w hi c h is what the KC di sc ussed,  inci dently)
<bmm_ > Hobbsee: t h anks!
<H obbs e e> Fujitsu: they' re tr eated thes ame as u niver se, or a lmost the s ame.
<La ser Joc k>Hob b s ee : I totally t h i nk t ho se pack age s needtobeava ila bl e, but gi ven ourfr ee ze sand  SRUp rocesses  i t d oe sn' t see m  likethe b estpl ac e , I MO
<Hob b se e >  qui te  t rue. 
<H ob bsee>  sti l l,there's  no perfe ctp lace ,an d i'm n ot sure where  t he best pl ac e w ould b e . 
<LaserJ ock> Riddell's repo isn o good? 
<L aserJ ock>  I usuall y g et stu fff rom th ere
<H obbse e>  La s e rJock : it 'si3 86 only, a n d  ri ddell 's  the  only o ne who has accesst o i t.
<LaserJock > i f Iw a nt  la t es t  KD Ep ack a g es
<Hobbsee> (t o the webs it e  a t all)
<Ho b bse e>  afaik,  non-ca nonic a l emplo yees cant  get acce ss  tou p dat e it?

: I'm_part of_the launchpad group, changelog_has "feisty;_urgency=low",_I'm doing_dput_-f iolanguage_20070226-1_source.changes
<bmm_> Hobbsee:_the -f was_because I first got_a rejection for_"unstable;_urgency=low"
<LaserJock> I'm just trying to figure out how we are going to get useful_packages_to people_2-3_months_after Feisty is released
<Hobbsee> fine,_so say it doesnt go_in at_all, until the libfreeze is hit - but_then_we cant put_in new packages at all
<LaserJock> exactly
<Hobbsee> bmm_: you need_to include revu in there
<Hobbsee> so,_we just say_"you_want_kde4, too bad, move_to feisty+1"
<LaserJock> but we can't/shouln't put_in new upstream versions even if_the packages do exist
<Hobbsee> which also seems_like a crap solution
<bmm_> Hobbsee: ooh.._ok. I'll fix that...
<Fujitsu> Hobbsee:_No, we_say `use the kubuntu.org repos_for Feisty'
<LaserJock> Hobbsee:_no, I_thought that's what_Riddell's repo was for
<Hobbsee> (which is_what the KC_discussed, incidently)
<bmm_> Hobbsee: thanks!
<Hobbsee> Fujitsu: they're_treated_the same as_universe,_or_almost the_same.
<LaserJock> Hobbsee: I_totally_think those_packages_need to be available, but given_our_freezes and SRU processes it doesn't seem_like the best place,_IMO
<Hobbsee>_quite true.
<Hobbsee> still, there's_no perfect place, and i'm_not sure where the best place_would be.
<LaserJock>_Riddell's repo_is no good?
<LaserJock> I usually get stuff from there
<Hobbsee> LaserJock: it's_i386 only, and riddell's the only_one who has access_to it.
<LaserJock>_if_I want latest_KDE_packages
<Hobbsee> (to_the website at all)
<Hobbsee> afaik, non-canonical employees_cant get_access to update it?
