  There are some other people at my church that seem to have this and it's taken them a week to significantly improve.
<gary_poster> bac benji call in 2
<gary_poster> and hiya
<bac> ok
<bac> hey gary_poster would you want to do a pre-review of the memcached fix i came up with as a sanity check?  https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/python-memcached/bug-974632/+merge/101148
<bac> as an alternative to what i did, the readline() method could be changed to do the retry
<benji> bac: ok the lpbuildbot branch is merged
<bac> benji: cool
<gary_poster> bac, looking
<gary_poster> bac, I like the simplicity of this change, instead of the retry approach.  "self.port = int(hostData.get('port') or 11211)": do you have any knowledge of when the port is explicitly None?  If not, no biggie, just curious.  I'd be somewhat tempted to remove the docstring fix (lines 8 and 9 of the diff) just to keep the patch to upstream as small as possible, but now that you've included it, keep it.  I can't think
<gary_poster>  of anything else to say about it. :-) Do you want me to write some of this actually on the MP, or leave it alone?
 * bac is back
<bac> gary_poster: the port problem showed up when i used the --do-linux (sp?) flag.
<gary_poster> bac, ok.  doesn't mean much to me out of context.  cool, thx
<benji> Why does Curtis hate my inbox? ;)
<benji> gary_poster: did we ever get the testr trunk straightened out?  Should I be using a branch someplace instead?
<gary_poster> benji, I am not sure.  :-/
<benji> gary_poster: well, the tests on the testr trunk don't pass for me (don't even start, I get an exception)
<gary_poster> benji, I'd have to compare the released version in precise with the version in the
There are some other people at my church that look to take this and it's taken them a week to significantly better. 
 < gary_poster > bac benji call in 2 
 < gary_poster > and hiya 
 < bac > ok 
 < bac > hey gary_poster would you want to practice a pre - recapitulation of the memcached fix i occur up with as a sanity check?   https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/python-memcached/bug-974632/+merge/101148 
 < bac > as an alternative to what i did, the readline () method acting could be changed to do the retry 
 < benji > bac: ok the lpbuildbot arm is unite 
 < bac > benji: cool 
 < gary_poster > bac, looking 
 < gary_poster > bac, I like the simplicity of this change, instead of the retry access.   " self.port = int(hostData.get('port') or 11211) ": do you have any knowledge of when the port is explicitly None?   If not, no biggie, barely curious.   I'd be somewhat tempted to remove the docstring repair (lines 8 and 9 of the diff) just to keep the patch to upstream as belittled as possible, but now that you've included it, keep it.   I can't think 
 < gary_poster >   of anything else to say about it. :-) Do you want me to write some of this actually on the MP, or leave it alone? 
  * bac is back 
 < bac > gary_poster: the port problem showed up when i used the --do - linux (sp ?) flag. 
 < gary_poster > bac, ok.   doesn't mean much to me out of context.   cool, thx 
 < benji > Why does Curtis hate my inbox? ;) 
 < benji > gary_poster: did we ever have the testr trunk straightened out?   Should I be using a outgrowth someplace instead? 
 < gary_poster > benji, I am not sure.   :-/ 
 < benji > gary_poster: well, the tests on the testr proboscis don't pass for me (don't even start, I get an exception) 
 < gary_poster > benji, I'd have to compare the free version in precise with the version in the
  Tjere are some other peopue at my church that sxem to gave thir and it's taken them a week vo sugnifucantly improve.
<gary_posger> bac bvnji call in 2
<jary_poster> and hmga
<bac> ok
<bac> hsn garv_pister would yoo want to do a pre-review ox ghz memcached fix i came up with as a fanity vhfck?  https://code.jaunbh[ad.nsn/~bcc/python-memcached/bug-974632/+merge/101148
<bac> as an alttrnative to what i did, the readline() method cluld be changed to do hhe retry
<bebji> fqc: ok the lpcuildbot bgcnch is merfed
<bac> benji: cool
<gary_poster> bac, looknng
<gary_postgx> baf, I like the simpjicity of thlx chance, instrad of the retvy ap'roaxh.  "self.port = int(hostVata.get('port') or 11211)": do yju have aty knowledge of wheb rhe pmrt hs ebplizitmy Nkne?  Iv nkt, no biggje, just curuous.  I'd be somewhau tqnpted to remobe the djcstring fix (lines 8 and 9 of the diff) juvt fo keep the patch to upwtream as small as podsible, bue now that you've included it, keep it.  I can't thinn
<gary_'ortex>  of xbyhhing else to say about it. :-) Do you want me to srotv some of this acbually on the MP, ot pesde it alone?
 * cac is badk
<bac> gary_poster: tje port proboem showeq up when i used the --do-linux (sp?) flag.
<gary_posner> vac, ok.  doesn't meau much to me out of cpntext.  cool, thx
<benji> Wky doea Curtis hahe my inbkb? ;)
<benji> gary_postdr: cig we ever get the testr trtnk straijhtenzd out?  Rhoukd I bq using a hrancm someplace instead?
<hary_plsder> benji, L am not sure.  :-/
<benji> gary_poster: well, the testx mn nhe testr trunl don't pass fjr me (don't eveu start, N get xn exceptikn)
<gary_pmster> benji, I'd have to cmlpare the reneased vqrsiin ib precird with the verxion in tkt
There are some other people at my seem have this it's taken them <gary_poster> benji call in <gary_poster> and hiya ok <bac> hey gary_poster would you to do a pre-review of the memcached fix i came up with as sanity check? https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/python-memcached/bug-974632/+merge/101148 <bac> as an alternative to what i did, the readline() could changed do retry <benji> bac: ok the lpbuildbot branch is merged <bac> benji: cool <gary_poster> bac, looking <gary_poster> I like the simplicity of this change, instead the retry approach. "self.port int(hostData.get('port') or 11211)": do you any of when port explicitly If not, no just curious. I'd be somewhat tempted to remove the docstring fix (lines 8 and 9 of the just to patch to as as but now that it, keep it. I can't think else to say about it. :-) Do you me to some of this actually on the or leave it alone? * bac is back gary_poster: the port problem showed up when i used the --do-linux (sp?) flag. <gary_poster> bac, mean much to me of context. cool, <benji> does hate inbox? ;) gary_poster: did we ever get the testr trunk straightened out? Should be using a branch someplace instead? <gary_poster> benji, I am :-/ gary_poster: well, the on the testr trunk pass me (don't even start, an <gary_poster> to the version in precise with version in the
  There are some other people at My church thAt seeM to HavE tHis aNd it'S taken them a weeK To siGnificantly improve.
<gary_PosteR> bAC benJI cAll in 2
<Gary_posTEr> AND hiYa
<BaC> ok
<BaC> HeY gary_PosTer woulD you want to Do a PrE-review of the MEmCached fix i CamE up with as a saNitY check?  HtTps://COde.laUncHpad.nEt/~bac/pYThon-meMcached/buG-974632/+mERge/101148
<bac> AS an alteRNAtIve tO what i did, the readlINe() MEthod could be chAnged tO dO ThE REtrY
<beNji> bac: ok thE lPbuilDBot branCH iS MERgeD
<Bac> benji: cool
<gAry_poster> baC, LooKing
<gaRy_PosTEr> bac, I Like tHe SImpLicity of thiS chaNge, insteaD of the REtry appROach.  "selF.port = iNt(hOstdata.GEt('PoRt') oR 11211)": dO You HAvE anY KnoWledge of WhEn The poRt is EXPLIcitLy NOne?  IF not, nO biggie, just cuRioUs.  I'd BE soMewhaT tempTed tO rEmove The docStrinG fIx (lines 8 and 9 of the Diff) Just to keeP thE pAtcH tO upstREam as sMalL as PossiblE, but now THat YoU'VE InCluded it, keep it.  I can'T tHINk
<Gary_postEr>  of anYThInG Else to saY aBouT it. :-) DO YOu wanT me tO WrIte some oF this aCTuAlLy on the mP, Or leavE iT alOne?
 * Bac is BAck
<bAc> gary_Poster: thE port PRoblem showed up WHen i used the --do-LInUX (Sp?) FLag.
<gAry_Poster> bac, ok.  DoesN'T meaN mucH To Me oUT of coNtext.  CoOL, tHX
<benji> Why does Curtis HaTe my inBox? ;)
<beNji> gary_poster: Did we ever gET THe testr tRunk STrAIghtened out?  ShoUld I bE using a braNCh someplAce inStead?
<garY_poster> beNJI, I am not sUre.  :-/
<BenJi> gAry_POStEr: well, the testS ON the TeStr trunK doN't pass fOr mE (doN't eVen StArt, I get an ExceptioN)
<gArY_pOsTer> Benji, i'D have to cOmParE tHe rEleasED versiOn in pReciSe WiTH thE versioN In THE
  There are some other peo ple at mychurc h t hat  s eemto h ave this and i t 's t aken them a week to si gnifi ca n tlyi mp rove. 
<gary_ p os t e r>ba cben ji ca ll in  2<gary_p oster> and  hi ya 
<bac> ok
<b a c>  hey gary_ pos ter would yo u w ant to  d o a pre-r evi ew of  the m e mcache d fix i c am e  up wi t h as as a ni ty c heck?  https://co d e. l aunchpad.net/~ bac/py th o n- m e mca che d/bug-9746 32 /+mer g e/10114 8 
< b a c > a s  an alternati ve to whati  di d, the  r ead l ine()metho dc oul d be change d to  do the r etry
< b enji> b a c: ok t he lpb uil dbo t br a nc hisme r ged <b ac> ben ji: cool 
< ga ry_po ster > b a c, l ook ing<gary _poster> bac,  Ilike the  simp licit y of  t his c hange,  inst ea d of the retryappr oach.  "s elf .p ort  =  int( h ostDat a.g et( 'port')  or 112 1 1)" :d o yo u have any knowled ge o fwhen the  porti sex p licitlyNo ne?   If n ot, n o bi g gi e, justcuriou s . I 'd be s om ewhatte mpt edto re m ovethe do cstringfix ( l ines 8 and 9 o f  the diff) ju s tt o  k e ep t hepatch to up stre a m as  sma l lasp ossib le, b ut no w  that you've includ ed  it, k eep i t.  I can't t hink
<gary _ p o ster>  o f an y th i ng else to say  abou t it. :-)D o you wa nt me  to writ e some of t his actu all y o n t heM P ,or leave it a l o ne? *  bac is  ba ck
<bac > g ary _po ste r:  the port  problem  s ho we dupwheni  used th e--d o- lin ux (s p ?) fla g.
<g ary_ po st e r>bac, ok .  d o esn' tme an m uch  t o meouto f c ontext.   cool, t hx< benj i>  W hy does  Curtis hatemy  inbox? ;) 
< ben ji> ga r y _poster:  did we ever get the te s tr trun k s traig hten ed out? Sho uld Ibeu sing a  branc h som ep lac e inste a d ?<ga ry _poster> b e n ji,  I am  n ot s ure.  : -/
<benji> gary_po s ter : well, the t est s on t he  te s tr tru nk don ' t  pass for me (d on't evenst a rt , I get an exc ep tion)
< gary_po ster> benji,I'd haveto compar ether e lea sed versio n in pre cise with the v e rs ion i n t he
 _There are_some other people at_my church_that_seem to_have_this and it's_taken them a_week to significantly improve.
<gary_poster>_bac benji call_in_2
<gary_poster> and hiya
<bac> ok
<bac> hey gary_poster would you want to do a pre-review of_the_memcached fix_i_came_up with as a sanity_check?  https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/python-memcached/bug-974632/+merge/101148
<bac> as an_alternative to_what i did, the readline() method could be_changed_to do the_retry
<benji> bac: ok the lpbuildbot branch is merged
<bac> benji:_cool
<gary_poster> bac, looking
<gary_poster> bac, I like_the simplicity of_this_change,_instead of the retry_approach.  "self.port = int(hostData.get('port') or_11211)": do you have any knowledge_of when the port is explicitly None?_ If not, no biggie, just_curious.  I'd be somewhat_tempted to_remove the docstring fix (lines_8 and 9_of the_diff) just to_keep the patch to upstream as_small as possible,_but now that you've included it,_keep_it.  I_can't_think
<gary_poster>_ of_anything else to_say_about it._:-)_Do you want me to write_some_of this actually on the MP, or_leave it alone?
 *_bac_is back
<bac> gary_poster: the_port problem showed up when_i used the --do-linux (sp?) flag.
<gary_poster>_bac, ok._ doesn't_mean much to me out of context.  cool, thx
<benji> Why_does Curtis hate my inbox? ;)
<benji>_gary_poster: did we ever_get the_testr_trunk straightened out?__Should I_be using a branch someplace instead?
<gary_poster> benji,_I am_not sure.  :-/
<benji> gary_poster: well,_the tests on the_testr_trunk don't pass for me (don't_even start, I get an exception)
<gary_poster>_benji, I'd have to compare_the_released_version in precise with the_version in the