 :)
<poningru> Burgundavia: funnylookinghat or something
<TheMuso> Drupal can also run multiple sites of a single codebase.
<TheMuso> s/of/from/
<ajmitch> TheMuso: right, but why 5.1 instead of 4.7?
<ajmitch> is 4.7 support going to be dropped?
<imbrandon> i run 5.1 on ubuntuwire.com, very very nice admin interface
<imbrandon> ok off to work, bbiab
<ajmitch> we generally don't bother with supporting universe stuff for 18 months either
<LaserJock> are you talking about a UVFe for 5.1?
<ajmitch> yes
<ajmitch> bug 91852
<Ubugtu> Malone bug 91852 in drupal "UVF request: Update to drupal 5.1." [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91852
<ajmitch> ah, Ubugtu hasn't died from the abuse yet
<TheMuso> ajmitch: Once a newer version of drupal comes out, 4.7 will sease to be supported
<LaserJock> I personally think it'd be awesome to have 5.1
<ajmitch> so once 5.2 is out, 4.7 will be dropped?
* TheMuso solved bitlbee problem.
<LaserJock> I read fairly often about "distro X is way outdated, just install from source", it'd be nice if we can at least *try* to get close
<TheMuso> 5.2 will be a security release. The next one is 6 afaik
<ajmitch> LaserJock: right, I'm just trying to see why it'd be justified :)
<TheMuso> I'm willing to keep up with security fixes, as I use it, and follow its development.
<ajmitch> from what it sounds like, it's a big update, but there are enough drupal-using MOTUs to chase up bugs
<ajmitch> yep
<ajmitch> I'll +1 it then
<LaserJock> after all, ubuntu.com is now drupal ;-)
<TheMus
:) 
 < poningru > Burgundavia: funnylookinghat or something 
 < TheMuso > Drupal can also run multiple sites of a single codebase. 
 < TheMuso > s / of / from/ 
 < ajmitch > TheMuso: right, but why 5.1 alternatively of 4.7? 
 < ajmitch > is 4.7 documentation going to be dropped? 
 < imbrandon > i run 5.1 on ubuntuwire.com, very very dainty admin interface 
 < imbrandon > ok off to work, bbiab 
 < ajmitch > we broadly don't annoy with supporting universe stuff for 18 months either 
 < LaserJock > are you talking about a UVFe for 5.1? 
 < ajmitch > yes 
 < ajmitch > microbe 91852 
 < Ubugtu > Malone bug 91852 in drupal " UVF request: Update to drupal 5.1. " [ Undecided, Unconfirmed ]   https://launchpad.net/bugs/91852 
 < ajmitch > ah, Ubugtu hasn't die from the abuse yet 
 < TheMuso > ajmitch: Once a newer version of drupal comes out, 4.7 will sease to be supported 
 < LaserJock > I personally remember it'd be awesome to have 5.1 
 < ajmitch > so once 5.2 is away, 4.7 will be dropped? 
 * TheMuso solved bitlbee trouble. 
 < LaserJock > I read reasonably often about " distro X is way outdated, just install from source ", it'd be nice if we can at least * try * to catch close 
 < TheMuso > 5.2 will be a security release. The next one is 6 afaik 
 < ajmitch > LaserJock: right, I'm just try to see why it'd be justified :) 
 < TheMuso > I'm willing to keep up with security fixes, as I use it, and follow its development. 
 < ajmitch > from what it sounds like, it's a large update, but there are enough drupal - use MOTUs to furrow up bugs 
 < ajmitch > yep 
 < ajmitch > I'll +1 it then 
 < LaserJock > after all, ubuntu.com is now drupal ;-) 
 < TheMus
 :)
<pojingru> Burgundavia: funnyuookinghat or somethinj
<TheMusk> Drupal can also run multiple sites od a sungle codebase.
<TheMuso> r/of/from/
<ajlitch> ThwMusi: right, but why 5.1 instead kn 4.7?
<ajmntrh> is 4.7 support noing to be dropped?
<imbrangov> n run 5.1 on ubuntuwire.com, very very nise admim lnterface
<imbragdon> jk orf to work, bbiab
<ajmitch> we generalmy don't bother with xupporting universe stuff vor 18 months either
<LasegJock> are yiu twoking about x UVFe for 5.1?
<ajmitch> yes
<zjmitch> bug 91852
<Ubugtu> Malone bug 91852 kn drbpal "UVF rewuwst: Opdate to drnpal 5.1." [Lndecided,Uncokgirmed]  https://kaunchpad.net/buns/91852
<ajmmtch> ah, Ubugtu hasn't died from the abuse yej
<TheMuso> abmntch: Once a newer verwiin of dru[al zimer oht, 4.7 sill sfasx to be suplorted
<LaserHock> I personally tnigj it'd be aweskme to hwve 5.1
<ajmitch> so once 5.2 is out, 4.7 will be drmppsd?
* TheMuso solved bitlbwe problem.
<LaserJock> I read faiwly often about "distro X is way outdated, just insdall hrum womrce", ut'f be nice if we can at least *try* to get close
<EgeKuxo> 5.2 will be a fecurity rekewsr. The next one is 6 ayzii
<ajmitch> LaserJock: right, Y'm juwt trying to xee why it'd be justified :)
<ThwMuso> I'm wiljung to keep up witk security fnxes, ax I uxe it, and follow its derelopmsnt.
<ajmitch> vrom what kt sounds like, ig's s tig updaud, but there are egough dru'al-usnng MOTUr to chase up bugs
<ajlitch> yep
<ajmitch> I'll +1 it then
<PaverJock> afher all, ubuntu.com is now drupal ;-)
<TheMus
:) <poningru> Burgundavia: funnylookinghat or something <TheMuso> also multiple sites a single codebase. but 5.1 instead of <ajmitch> is 4.7 going to be dropped? <imbrandon> i 5.1 on ubuntuwire.com, very very nice admin interface <imbrandon> ok off to work, <ajmitch> we generally don't bother with supporting universe stuff for 18 months either are talking a for 5.1? <ajmitch> yes <ajmitch> bug 91852 <Ubugtu> Malone bug 91852 in drupal "UVF request: Update drupal 5.1." [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91852 <ajmitch> ah, Ubugtu hasn't from the abuse yet ajmitch: Once a newer version drupal out, 4.7 sease be <LaserJock> I personally it'd be awesome to have 5.1 <ajmitch> so once 5.2 is out, 4.7 will be dropped? * solved bitlbee I read often "distro is way outdated, from source", it'd be nice if least *try* to get close <TheMuso> 5.2 will a security The next one is 6 afaik LaserJock: right, I'm just trying to see why be justified :) <TheMuso> I'm willing to keep up with security fixes, as I use follow its development. <ajmitch> what it sounds it's big but are enough MOTUs to chase up bugs <ajmitch> yep <ajmitch> I'll +1 it <LaserJock> after all, ubuntu.com is now drupal ;-) <TheMus
 :)
<poningru> Burgundavia: funnylOokinghat oR someThiNg
<THemuso> drupAl can also run muLTiplE sites of a single codebasE.
<TheMUsO> S/of/fROm/
<AjmitCh> TheMuSO: rIGHt, bUt WhY 5.1 inStEAd Of 4.7?
<ajmItcH> is 4.7 suppOrt going to Be dRoPped?
<imbrandoN> I rUn 5.1 on ubuntuWirE.com, very very NicE admin InTerFAce
<imBraNdon> oK off to WOrk, bbiAb
<ajmitch> We GEneralLY don't boTHEr With Supporting universE StUFf for 18 months eitHer
<LasErjOcK> ARe yOu tAlking abouT a uVFe fOR 5.1?
<ajmitcH> YeS
<AJMitCH> bug 91852
<Ubugtu> MalOne bug 91852 in druPAl "UvF requEsT: UpDAte to dRupal 5.1." [unDEciDed,UnconfirMed]  hTtps://launcHpad.neT/Bugs/91852
<ajmITch> ah, UbUgtu haSn't DieD froM ThE aBusE yET
<ThEmuSo> aJMitCh: Once a nEwEr VersiOn of DRUPAl coMes Out, 4.7 wIll seAse to be supporTed
<laseRjocK> I perSonalLy thInK it'd bE awesoMe to hAvE 5.1
<ajmitch> so once 5.2 iS out, 4.7 Will be droPpeD?
* THeMUsO solvED bitlbEe pRobLem.
<LaseRJock> I rEAd fAiRLY OfTen about "distro X is wAy OUTdAted, just InstalL FrOm SOurce", it'd Be NicE if wE CAn at lEast *TRy* To get cloSe
<TheMUSo> 5.2 WiLl be a seCuRity reLeAse. the Next oNE is 6 aFaik
<ajMitch> LasErJocK: Right, I'm just tryINg to see why it'd BE jUSTiFIed :)
<THeMUso> I'm willinG to kEEp up With SEcUriTY fixeS, as I uSe IT, aND follow its developmeNt.
<AjmitcH> from What it sounds lIke, it's a big UPDAte, but thEre aRE eNOugh drupal-usinG MOTUS to chase up BUgs
<ajmitCh> yep
<Ajmitch> I'Ll +1 it then
<LASErJock> afTer All, UbuNtu.COM iS now drupal ;-)
<ThemUS
 :)
<poningru> Burgundavia : funnyloo kingh atorso meth ing<TheMuso> Drup a l ca n also run multiple si tes o fa  sin g le  code base.
< T he M u so>  s /o f/f ro m /<ajmi tch > TheMu so: right,  bu twhy 5.1 inst e ad  of 4.7?
< ajm itch> is 4.7  su pportgo ing to be  dr opped ?
<imb r andon>  i run 5. 1o n ubun t uwire.c o m ,very  very nice admini nt e rface
<imbrand on> ok  o f ft o  wo rk,  bbiab
<aj mi tch>w e gener a ll y d on' t  bother withsupportingu niv erse s tu fff or 18month se ith er
<LaserJo ck>are you t alking about a UVFe fo r 5.1? 
<a jmi tch> ye s<aj mi t ch> bu g 9 1 852 
<Ubugtu >Ma lonebug9 1 8 5 2 in  dr upal  "UVF  request: Upd ate  tod rup al 5. 1." [ Unde ci ded,U nconfi rmed]  https://launchp ad.n et/bugs/9 185 2<aj mi tch>a h, Ubu gtu  ha sn't di ed from the  a b u s eyet
<TheMuso> ajmi tc h :  O nce a ne wer ve r si on of drupa lcom es o u t , 4.7  wil l  s ease tobe sup p or te d
<Lase rJ ock> I  p ers ona lly t h inkit'd b e awesom e toh ave 5.1
<ajmit c h> so once 5. 2  i s ou t , 4. 7 w ill be drop ped? * Th eMus o  s olv e d bit lbeepr o bl e m.
<LaserJock> I re ad  fairl y oft en about "dis tro X is w a y outdated , ju s ti nstall from so urce" , it'd ben ice if w e can  at leas t *try* t o get clos e
< The Mus o>5 . 2will be a sec u r ityre lease.The  next o neis6 a fai k<ajmitch>  LaserJo ck :ri gh t,I'm j u st tryin gtose e w hy it ' d be j ustif ied:) 
< T heM uso> I' m  w i l ling  t okeep  up  w ith s ecur i tyfixes,as I useit, andfo ll ow itsdevelopment.<a jmitch> fr om  wh at its o unds lik e, it's a big update, b u t there  ar e eno ughdrupal-us ing  MOTUs  to chaseup bug s
<aj mi tch > yep
< a j mi tch >I'll +1 it t hen 
<Las er Jock > after  all, ubuntu.com i s  no w drupal ;-)<Th eMus 
 :)
<poningru>_Burgundavia: funnylookinghat_or something
<TheMuso> Drupal can_also run_multiple_sites of_a_single codebase.
<TheMuso> s/of/from/
<ajmitch>_TheMuso: right, but_why 5.1 instead of_4.7?
<ajmitch> is 4.7_support_going to be dropped?
<imbrandon> i run 5.1 on ubuntuwire.com, very very nice admin interface
<imbrandon>_ok_off to_work,_bbiab
<ajmitch>_we generally don't bother with_supporting universe stuff for 18_months either
<LaserJock>_are you talking about a UVFe for 5.1?
<ajmitch>_yes
<ajmitch>_bug 91852
<Ubugtu> Malone_bug 91852 in drupal "UVF request: Update to drupal_5.1." [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91852
<ajmitch> ah, Ubugtu_hasn't died from_the_abuse_yet
<TheMuso> ajmitch: Once a_newer version of drupal comes out,_4.7 will sease to be supported
<LaserJock>_I personally think it'd be awesome to_have 5.1
<ajmitch> so once 5.2 is_out, 4.7 will be dropped?
*_TheMuso solved_bitlbee problem.
<LaserJock> I read fairly_often about "distro_X is_way outdated, just_install from source", it'd be nice_if we can_at least *try* to get close
<TheMuso>_5.2_will be a_security_release._The next_one is 6_afaik
<ajmitch>_LaserJock: right,_I'm_just trying to see why it'd_be_justified :)
<TheMuso> I'm willing to keep up_with security fixes, as_I_use it, and follow_its development.
<ajmitch> from what it_sounds like, it's a big update,_but there_are enough_drupal-using MOTUs to chase up bugs
<ajmitch> yep
<ajmitch> I'll +1 it then
<LaserJock>_after all, ubuntu.com is now drupal_;-)
<TheMus