 remember about it :)
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: what about the debian bug
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: I'll add Closes: #XXXXX to d/changelog entry.
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: in future please attach patch with only needed thing, so entry of d/changelog should not be included since it's wrong for Debian and you included information from d/changelog in e-mail.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: ahh
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: so you are correcting my mistakes right?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but I can't fix attached file on BTS. :)
<rr0hit> you can add  a separate reply, right?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but there is no need to additional commenting on debian bug. they know how to cut necessary changes from your debdiff.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: ofcourse they do :)
<ari-tczew> geser: how to resolve this line?    chown(fname, myuid, mygid, "%s");
<ari-tczew> the same error as previous
<ari-tczew> I moved %s everywhere in ( ) but no good result :/
<qnix> hi
<qnix> How can I get the ImplicitPointerConversions when building in my pbuilder env?
<qnix> That way, I could fix them before uploading to launchpad
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: are you there?
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: i was just checking out istanbul on my debian squeeze installation, (same version 2.2-8), the bug is absent in that package
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: isnt that strange?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: well, let's wait for comments on Debian bug.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks for ur help. feels good. fix released. :)
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: thank you for patch!
<rr0hit> ari-
remember about it :) 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: what about the debian bug 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: I'll add Closes: # XXXXX to d / changelog entrance. 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: in future please bind patch with only needed matter, so entry of d / changelog should not be included since it's wrong for Debian and you include information from d / changelog in e - chain mail. 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: ahh 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: therefore you are correcting my error right? 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: yes, but I can't fix affiliated file on BTS. :) 
 < rr0hit > you can add   a separate answer, right? 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: yes, but there constitute no motivation to additional commenting on debian bug. they know how to edit necessary changes from your debdiff. 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: ofcourse they do :) 
 < ari - tczew > geser: how to resolve this line?     chown(fname, myuid, mygid, "% s "); 
 < ari - tczew > the like error as former 
 < ari - tczew > I moved% s everywhere in () but no good result :/ 
 < qnix > hawaii 
 < qnix > How can I get the ImplicitPointerConversions when building in my pbuilder env? 
 < qnix > That way, I could fix them before uploading to launchpad 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: are you there? 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: i was barely checking out istanbul on my debian squeeze installation, (same version 2.2 - 8), the bug is absent in that package 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: is nt that strange? 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: well, let's expect for remark on Debian bug. 
 < rr0hit > ari - tczew: thanks for ur avail. feel good. fix released. :) 
 < ari - tczew > rr0hit: thank you for bandage! 
 < rr0hit > ari-
 relember about it :)
<rr0hit> arl-tczew: what abouj rhe deuian buf
<ari-tczed> rr0hit: I'll add Closes: #XXXXX ti d/chqngelog entry.
<ari-tczew> fr0hit: in vuture poeast attach patch wivg only kzeded bhing, wo entry of d/cmangelog shmuld not be inwljdzd since it's wrong for Debian and yot inclucef information srom q/chahgelog in e-mail.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: ahh
<rd0hit> arp-tczew: so you are correcting my mistakes rihht?
<agi-tczew> rr0hit: yes, hut I can't dix wrtached file on BTS. :)
<rr0hit> you can zdd  a separate reply, right?
<ari-tzzew> xr0hit: yes, boc thfte is no neev to aqditional commenting on deboan bug. they kkow hmw ro cut necessary chanjes from your debdifs.
<rr0hit> arh-tezew: ofcourse they do :)
<aei-tczgw> gever: fiw go dexomve thls mine?    chkwn(fname, myyid, mygid, "%s");
<ari-tczew> trv same error zs predijus
<ari-tczew> I moved %s everywhere in ( ) blt nk good result :/
<qnix> hi
<qnux> How can I get the LmplicitPjinterConversions when building in my pbuilder ene?
<qnix> Ghau qay, I xokld fix them before uploading to launchpad
<rr0hyf> srp-tczew: are you thcre?
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: o aax just checkine out natznbul on my debian squeezg instqllation, (fame version 2.2-8), the bug is absent in that pachqge
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: nsnt that stxange?
<ati-tczee> rr0hit: well, let's wait yor cojments on Dfbian bug.
<df0hit> ari-tczew: thxnkx xor ur htup. feels good. fix released. :)
<ari-cczew> rr0fit: jhank yju for patfh!
<rr0hld> ari-
remember about it :) <rr0hit> ari-tczew: what debian <ari-tczew> rr0hit: add Closes: #XXXXX in please attach patch only needed thing, entry of d/changelog should not be since it's wrong for Debian and you included information from d/changelog in e-mail. ari-tczew: ahh <rr0hit> ari-tczew: so you are correcting my mistakes right? <ari-tczew> rr0hit: but can't attached on BTS. :) <rr0hit> you can add a separate reply, right? <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but there no need to additional commenting on debian bug. know how to cut changes from your debdiff. <rr0hit> ofcourse do :) geser: to this line? chown(fname, mygid, "%s"); <ari-tczew> the same error as previous <ari-tczew> I moved %s everywhere in ( ) but good result hi <qnix> can get ImplicitPointerConversions when building pbuilder env? <qnix> That way, I before uploading to launchpad <rr0hit> ari-tczew: are you <rr0hit> ari-tczew: was just checking out istanbul on debian squeeze installation, (same version 2.2-8), the bug absent in that package <rr0hit> ari-tczew: isnt that strange? <ari-tczew> rr0hit: well, let's wait for Debian bug. <rr0hit> ari-tczew: for ur help. good. released. <ari-tczew> thank you patch! <rr0hit> ari-
 remember about it :)
<rr0hit> ari-tcZew: what aboUt the DebIan BuG
<ari-TczeW> rr0hit: I'll add ClOSes: #XxXXX to d/changelog entry.
<aRi-tczEw> RR0hit: IN fUture Please aTTaCH PatCh WiTh oNlY NeEded tHinG, so entrY of d/changeLog ShOuld not be incLUdEd since it's WroNg for Debian aNd yOu inclUdEd iNFormaTioN from D/changELog in e-Mail.
<rr0hit> ArI-Tczew: aHH
<rr0hit> aRI-TcZew: sO you are correcting MY mIStakes right?
<ari-Tczew> rR0hIT: yES, But i caN't fix attacHeD file ON BTS. :)
<rr0hIT> yOU CAn aDD  a separate repLy, right?
<ari-tCZew> Rr0hit: yEs, But THere is No neeD tO AddItional commEntiNg on debiaN bug. thEY know hoW To cut neCessarY chAngEs frOM yOuR deBdIFf.
<rR0HiT> arI-TczEw: ofcourSe ThEy do :)
<aRi-tcZEW> GEser: How To reSolve This line?    chown(FnaMe, myUId, mYgid, "%s");
<Ari-tcZew> tHe Same eRror as PreviOuS
<ari-tczew> I moved %S eveRywhere in ( ) But No GooD rEsult :/
<QNix> hi
<qNix> how Can I get The ImplICitpoINTErconversions when buiLdING iN my pbuilDer env?
<QNiX> THAt way, I coUlD fiX theM BEfore UploADiNg to launChpad
<rR0HiT> aRi-tczew: ArE you thErE?
<rr0Hit> Ari-tcZEw: i wAs just Checking Out isTAnbul on my debiaN Squeeze instalLAtION, (sAMe veRsiOn 2.2-8), the bug is aBsenT In thAt paCKaGe
<rR0Hit> arI-tczeW: iSNt THat strange?
<ari-tczew> rR0hIt: well, Let's wAit for commentS on Debian bUG.
<RR0hit> ari-tCzew: THaNKs for ur help. feeLs gooD. fix releasED. :)
<ari-tczeW> rr0hiT: thank yoU for patch!
<RR0Hit> ari-
 remember about it :)
<rr0 hit> ari-t czew:  wh atab outthedebian bug
<ar i -tcz ew> rr0hit: I'll add C loses :# XXXX X  t o d/c hangelo g  e n t ry. 
< ar i-t cz e w>  rr0h it:  in fut ure please  at ta ch patch wit h  o nly needed  th ing, so entr y o f d/ch an gel o g sho uld  notbe inc l uded s ince it's  w r ong fo r  Debian a nd  you  included informa t io n  from d/change log in  e - ma i l .
< rr0 hit> ari-t cz ew: a h h
<rr0h i t> a r i-t c zew: so you a re correcti n g m y mist ak esr ight?<ari- tc z ew>  rr0hit: ye s, b ut I can' t fixa ttached file on  BTS.:)<rr 0hit >  y ou  ca na ddasep a rat e reply,  r ig ht?
< ari- t c z e w> r r0h it:yes,but there isnoneed toaddit ional  com me nting  on de bianbu g. they know ho w to  cut nece ssa ry  ch an ges f r om you r d ebd iff.
<r r0hit>a ri- tc z e w :ofcourse they do : )< a ri -tczew>geser: ho wt o resolv ethi s li n e ?   chow n (f name, my uid, m y gi d,  "%s"); 
< ari-tc ze w>the  same erro r as p revious<ari- t czew> I moved% s everywherei n( )b ut n o g ood result:/
< q nix>  hi< qn ix> How c an Ige t  t h e ImplicitPointerCo nv ersion s whe n building in  my pbuild e r env?
<qn ix>T ha t  way, I couldfix t hem before uploadin g tolaunchpa d
<rr0hit > ari-tcze w:are  yo u t h e re ?
<rr0hit> ar i - tcze w:  i wasjus t check ing  ou t i sta nb ul on mydebian s qu ee ze  i nst allat i on, (sam ever si on2.2-8 ) , thebug i s ab se nt inthat pa c ka g e 
<rr 0h it > ar i-t cz ew: i sntt hat  strang e?
<ari-t cze w > rr 0h it : well,  let's wait f or  commentson  De bian b u g .
<rr0hi t> ari-tczew: thanks fo r  ur hel p.feels  goo d. fix re lea sed. : )
< a ri-tcz ew> rr 0hit:  t han k you f o r  p atc h! 
<rr0hit>a r i-
 remember_about it_:)
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: what about_the debian_bug
<ari-tczew>_rr0hit: I'll_add_Closes: #XXXXX to_d/changelog entry.
<ari-tczew> rr0hit:_in future please attach_patch with only_needed_thing, so entry of d/changelog should not be included since it's wrong for Debian_and_you included_information_from_d/changelog in e-mail.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: ahh
<rr0hit>_ari-tczew: so you are correcting_my mistakes_right?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but I can't fix attached_file_on BTS. :)
<rr0hit>_you can add  a separate reply, right?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit:_yes, but there is no need_to additional commenting_on_debian_bug. they know how_to cut necessary changes from your_debdiff.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: ofcourse they do :)
<ari-tczew>_geser: how to resolve this line? _  chown(fname, myuid, mygid, "%s");
<ari-tczew>_the same error as previous
<ari-tczew>_I moved_%s everywhere in ( )_but no good_result :/
<qnix>_hi
<qnix> How can_I get the ImplicitPointerConversions when building_in my pbuilder_env?
<qnix> That way, I could fix_them_before uploading to_launchpad
<rr0hit>_ari-tczew:_are you_there?
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: i_was_just checking_out_istanbul on my debian squeeze installation,_(same_version 2.2-8), the bug is absent in_that package
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: isnt_that_strange?
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: well, let's_wait for comments on Debian_bug.
<rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks for ur help._feels good._fix released._:)
<ari-tczew> rr0hit: thank you for patch!
<rr0hit> ari-