 forgetting
<LaserJock> launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+new
<LaserJock> bah
<LaserJock> +queue
<TheMuso> right
<LaserJock> do you guys think it'd be good to have the package name in the body of *every* bug email?
<crimsun> s/package/source package/
<TheMuso> Yes actually.
<TheMuso> I find myself having to open the bug just to have a look at times
<LaserJock> crimsun: sorry, yes
<LaserJock> TheMuso: what client do you use for email?
<LaserJock> I was debating this with kiko this morning
<TheMuso> LaserJock: Mutt.
<LaserJock> because he'd like to keep the bug body uncluttered and said that the X-Launchpad-Bug header should be sufficient
<TheMuso> Actually... Yes, I could work something from that.
<LaserJock> but TBird and Kmail don't seem to be able to selectively show non-standard headers
<LaserJock> evo and mutt can
<TheMuso> yeah mutt certainly can.
<LaserJock> mutt can do anything
<LaserJock> I wish TBird wasn't such and easy to use and portable app
<TheMuso> Except read receipts, which aren't standards compliant anyway.
<LaserJock> because it surely stinks at some things
<TheMuso> afaik
<Fujitsu> LaserJock: Same... I use it, but it is really lacking in some areas.
<LaserJock> a Reply-To-List feature and header selectivity would make it much better for me
<Fujitsu> Proper GnuPG support would also be nice.
<LaserJock> enigmail doesn't work well for you?
<Fujitsu> It doesn't use the proper caching mechanisms, for one. That's a little dangerous.
<TheMuso> I have always noticed that email from tbird users with gpg has inline signing.
<Fujitsu> Coredumps for Thunderbird are dangerous because of that.
<TheMuso> signatures even
<
forgetting 
 < LaserJock > launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+new 
 < LaserJock > bah 
 < LaserJock > + queue 
 < TheMuso > right 
 < LaserJock > do you guys think it'd be good to get the software name in the body of * every * bug electronic mail? 
 < crimsun > s / package / reservoir package/ 
 < TheMuso > Yes actually. 
 < TheMuso > I find myself have to open the bug just to have a look at times 
 < LaserJock > crimsun: sorry, yes 
 < LaserJock > TheMuso: what node do you use for email? 
 < LaserJock > I was consider this with kiko this dawn 
 < TheMuso > LaserJock: Mutt. 
 < LaserJock > because he'd like to keep the bug body uncluttered and say that the X - Launchpad - Bug header should be sufficient 
 < TheMuso > Actually... Yes, I could work something from that. 
 < LaserJock > but TBird and Kmail don't appear to be able to selectively show non - standard headers 
 < LaserJock > evo and mutt can 
 < TheMuso > yeah mutt surely can. 
 < LaserJock > mutt can practice anything 
 < LaserJock > I wish TBird wasn't such and easy to use and portable app 
 < TheMuso > Except read receipts, which aren't criterion compliant anyway. 
 < LaserJock > because it surely stinks at some things 
 < TheMuso > afaik 
 < Fujitsu > LaserJock: Same... I use it, but it is in truth lacking in some areas. 
 < LaserJock > a Reply - To - List feature and header selectivity would make it much better for me 
 < Fujitsu > Proper GnuPG support would also be decent. 
 < LaserJock > enigmail doesn't work well for you? 
 < Fujitsu > It doesn't use the proper hoard mechanism, for one. That's a short dangerous. 
 < TheMuso > I have always noticed that email from tbird users with gpg has inline signing. 
 < Fujitsu > Coredumps for Thunderbird are dangerous because of that. 
 < TheMuso > signatures even 
 <
 foggetting
<LaserJock> launchkad.net/ubuntu/feisti/+nww
<LasecJock> bzh
<LaserJuck> +queue
<TheMuso> right
<LaserJlcj> do tou guys think it'd be eood to hwve the packege name in the ukdy of *crery* gmg emcio?
<crimsun> s/packsge/source [ackage/
<TheMuso> Yds actually.
<TheMuso> I find myself havigg to olej the bug just to nwve z look at times
<LaserJock> crimsun: skrry, yev
<LaserJock> ThrMuso: what client do you ude flr email?
<LaserJock> L was debatung eyis with kiku this morning
<TheMuso> MaserJock: Mutt.
<LaserJock> because he'd kike to keg' thf bug body uicluttvred and said that tha X-Launvhpad-Bug headev shonld ve sufficient
<TheMuso> Ectually... Yes, I could work somatking from that.
<LaserJoxk> but JBird and Jmakl soi't aeem tl bx able to sslectively whow non-standard hesdqgx
<LaserJock> ebo and mttt can
<TheMuso> yeah mutt certainly can.
<LdsedJock> mutt can do anythung
<LaserJock> I wish THird wasn'e such and easy to use and portable app
<TheMuso> Exwept cexd xcgeipgw, ahich aren't standards compliant anyway.
<LaserJosi> nebause it surely sbinks at some thinbs
<HhrIuso> afaik
<Fujktsu> LcaedJock: Same... I use ih, but ij is rwally laching in some areas.
<LaserJock> a Rwply-To-List fvatuee and header seleetivity woulb make it mich better for me
<Fujitsb> Propsr GnuPG suoport wouma also be nice.
<LarerMocn> enigmail doesn't work welj for you?
<Hujitxu> It duesn'j use tre proper fachikc mechanisms, for oje. Thct's a little dajgerous.
<TheMuso> I have always novmced that emaol frmm tbird userx with gpg haf inline signiug.
<Fujitsb> Coreaumps for Nhunderbicd are dangewous because mv that.
<TheMusm> signattres eveb
<
forgetting <LaserJock> launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+new <LaserJock> bah <LaserJock> +queue <LaserJock> you guys it'd be good in body of *every* email? <crimsun> s/package/source <TheMuso> Yes actually. <TheMuso> I find having to open the bug just to have a look at times <LaserJock> sorry, yes <LaserJock> TheMuso: what client do you use for email? <LaserJock> I debating with this <TheMuso> LaserJock: Mutt. <LaserJock> because he'd like to keep the bug body uncluttered and said that X-Launchpad-Bug header should be sufficient <TheMuso> Actually... Yes, could work something from <LaserJock> but TBird and Kmail seem be able selectively non-standard <LaserJock> evo and can <TheMuso> yeah mutt certainly can. <LaserJock> mutt can do anything <LaserJock> I wish TBird wasn't such easy to portable app Except receipts, aren't standards compliant because it surely stinks at some <Fujitsu> LaserJock: Same... I use it, but it really lacking some areas. <LaserJock> a Reply-To-List feature header selectivity would make it much better for <Fujitsu> Proper GnuPG support would also be nice. <LaserJock> enigmail doesn't work well for you? doesn't use the proper mechanisms, for one. a dangerous. I always noticed email from tbird users with gpg has inline signing. <Fujitsu> Coredumps Thunderbird are dangerous because of that. <TheMuso> signatures even <
 forgetting
<LaserJock> launchPad.net/ubunTu/feiSty/+New
<laSerJOck> bAh
<LaserJock> +queUE
<Themuso> right
<LaserJock> do yoU guys ThINk it'D Be Good tO have thE PaCKAge NaMe In tHe BOdY of *evEry* Bug emaiL?
<crimsun> s/pAckAgE/source packaGE/
<THeMuso> Yes aCtuAlly.
<TheMuso> I FinD myselF hAviNG to opEn tHe bug Just to HAve a loOk at times
<laSErJock> CRimsun: sORRy, Yes
<LAserJock> TheMuso: whAT cLIent do you use foR email?
<laSErjOCk> I Was Debating thIs With kIKo this mORnING
<themUso> LaserJock: MUtt.
<LaserJocK> BecAuse he'D lIke TO keep tHe bug BoDY unCluttered anD saiD that the X-launchPAd-Bug heADer shouLd be suFfiCieNt
<ThEmuSo> actUaLLy... YES, I CouLD woRk somethInG fRom thAt.
<LaSERjOck> bUt Tbird And KmAil don't seem to Be aBle tO SelEctivEly shOw noN-sTandaRd headErs
<LaSeRJock> evo and mutt Can
<THeMuso> yeaH muTt CerTaInly cAN.
<LaserjocK> muTt can do AnythinG
<lasErjOCK> I Wish TBird wasn't such AnD EAsY to use anD portaBLe ApP
<theMuso> EXcEpt Read RECeiptS, whiCH aRen't stanDards cOMpLiAnt anywAy.
<laserJOcK> beCauSe it sURely Stinks At some thIngs
<THEMuso> afaik
<FujiTSu> LaserJock: SaME... I USE iT, But iT is Really lackiNg in SOme aReas.
<lAsErJOCk> a RePly-To-liST fEAture and header selecTiVity woUld maKe it much betteR for me
<FujiTSU> proper GnUPG sUPpORt would also be nIce.
<LaSerJock> eniGMail doesN't worK well for You?
<FujitsU> iT doesn't uSe tHe pRopEr cACHiNg mechanisms, fOR One. THaT's a littLe dAngerouS.
<ThEMuSo> I HavE aLways notiCed that eMaIl FrOm TbiRd useRS with gpg HaS inLiNe sIgninG.
<fujitsU> CoreDumpS fOr tHunDerbird ARe DANgerOuS bEcauSe oF tHat.
<ThEMusO> SigNatures Even
<
 forgetting
<LaserJock> la unchpad.ne t/ubu ntu /fe is ty/+ new<LaserJock> ba h 
<La serJock> +queue
<TheMu so> r ig h t
<L a se rJock > do yo u  g u y s t hi nk  it 'd be  good  to  have t he package  na me  in the body of  *every* b ugemail?
<crim sun > s/pa ck age / sourc e p ackag e/
<Th e Muso>Yes actua ll y .
<The M uso> If i nd  mys elf having to ope n  t h e bug just tohave a  l o ok a t t ime s
<LaserJo ck > cri m sun: so r ry , y es< LaserJock> Th eMuso: what cli ent do  y ouu se for  emai l? <La serJock> Iwasdebatingthis w i th kiko this mo rning<Th eMu so>L as er Joc k: Mut t .<La s erJ ock> bec au se  he'd  lik e t o  kee p t he b ug bo dy uncluttere d a nd s a idthatthe X -Lau nc hpad- Bug he adersh ould be suffici ent<TheMuso>  Ac tu all y. .. Ye s , I co uld  wo rk some thing f r omth a t . 
< LaserJock> but TBi rd a nd  Kmail d on't s e em  t o  be able  t o s elec t i velyshow no n-standa rd hea d er s<LaserJ oc k> evo  a ndmut t can <The Muso>yeah mut t cer t ainly can.
<La s erJock> muttc an d oa nyth ing 
<LaserJock > Iw ishTBir d  w asn ' t suc h and  e a sy to use and portable  a pp
<Th eMuso > Except read  receipts, w h ich aren 't s t an d ards compliant  anyw ay.
<Laser J ock> bec auseit surel y stinksa t  some th ing s
< The Mus o >  a faik
<Fujitsu > Lase rJ ock: Sa me. .. I us e i t,but  it  i s reallylackingin  s om eare as.
< L aserJock >a R ep ly- To-Li s t feat ure a nd h ea de r  se lectivi t yw o uldma ke  itmuc hbette r fo r  me 
<Fujit su> Prope r G n uPGsu pp ort wou ld also be ni ce .
<LaserJo ck > e nigmai l doesn'twork well for you?
<Fuj i tsu> It  do esn't  use  the prop ercachin g m e chanis ms, fo r one .Tha t ' s a l i t tl e d an gerous.
<T h e Mus o> Iha ve a lways n oticed that emailf rom  tbird userswit h gp g ha s i n li n e s ig n ing . <Fujitsu> Cored umps for T hu n de rbird ared ang er ous bec ause of  that . 
<TheMu so> signa tures eve n<
 forgetting
<LaserJock>_launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+new
<LaserJock> bah
<LaserJock>_+queue
<TheMuso> right
<LaserJock> do you_guys think_it'd_be good_to_have the package_name in the_body of *every* bug_email?
<crimsun> s/package/source package/
<TheMuso>_Yes_actually.
<TheMuso> I find myself having to open the bug just to have a look_at_times
<LaserJock> crimsun:_sorry,_yes
<LaserJock>_TheMuso: what client do you_use for email?
<LaserJock> I was_debating this_with kiko this morning
<TheMuso> LaserJock: Mutt.
<LaserJock> because he'd_like_to keep the_bug body uncluttered and said that the X-Launchpad-Bug header_should be sufficient
<TheMuso> Actually... Yes, I_could work something_from_that.
<LaserJock>_but TBird and Kmail_don't seem to be able to_selectively show non-standard headers
<LaserJock> evo and_mutt can
<TheMuso> yeah mutt certainly can.
<LaserJock> mutt_can do anything
<LaserJock> I wish TBird_wasn't such and easy to_use and_portable app
<TheMuso> Except read receipts,_which aren't standards_compliant anyway.
<LaserJock>_because it surely_stinks at some things
<TheMuso> afaik
<Fujitsu> LaserJock:_Same... I use_it, but it is really lacking_in_some areas.
<LaserJock> a_Reply-To-List_feature_and header_selectivity would make_it_much better_for_me
<Fujitsu> Proper GnuPG support would also_be_nice.
<LaserJock> enigmail doesn't work well for you?
<Fujitsu>_It doesn't use the_proper_caching mechanisms, for one._That's a little dangerous.
<TheMuso> I_have always noticed that email from_tbird users_with gpg_has inline signing.
<Fujitsu> Coredumps for Thunderbird are dangerous because of that.
<TheMuso>_signatures even
<