 I'm almost inclined to let someone just start adding actions and then refactor
<gary_poster> except that you seem to have a vision
<danilos> gary_poster, fwiw, I think the basis here is sound (basically, in the branch you reviewed: other than'reason' and 'vars' we need to add supported actions, and if it's "unsubscribe-team", that action can go through vars.teams to offer individual team unsubscribe actions)
<danilos> gary_poster, if folk find it too hard to follow "my vision", I am happy with the approach you suggest as well
<gary_poster> I think it is a nice simple vision that I feel dumb for not understanding well ;-)
<gary_poster> So you think that gather_nondirect_subscriptions should add "actions"
<danilos> gary_poster, and my vision only concerns the side of "what actions are possible for this subscription box"
<danilos> gary_poster, exactly
<gary_poster> ok
<gary_poster> have you thought about what to offer when it is teams, not a team?  One action per team, I'm thinking
<gary_poster> OK
<gary_poster> I think I have enough to do this or watch someone else do this
<gary_poster> danilos, thank you very much!
<danilos> gary_poster, yeah, I think it should be one action per team, but do note that grouping is sometimes not even per team (i.e. each team will have a separate box)
<gary_poster> ok
<gary_poster> we'll run with what we have and see how it goes :-)
<danilos> gary_poster, heh, excellent, I hope you find it easy to extend and test (those were my two main concerns)
<gary_poster> cool danilos.  bye :-)
<danilos> bye :)
<gary_poster> bac, benji, where are you all in terms of starting something else?  I can do any of the following:
<gary_poster> - talk with one or both of you all now to figure out what we are doing
<gary_poster> - have lunch, and then talk
I'm almost inclined to let someone just depart lend actions and then refactor 
 < gary_poster > except that you seem to have a imagination 
 < danilos > gary_poster, fwiw, I think the basis here is audio (basically, in the branch you reviewed: early than'reason' and' volt-ampere' we need to add back actions, and if it's " unsubscribe - team ", that action can go through vars.teams to offer individual team unsubscribe actions) 
 < danilos > gary_poster, if folk recover it too hard to follow " my imagination ", I am happy with the approach you suggest as well 
 < gary_poster > I remember it is a nice simple vision that I feel dumb for not understand well ;-) 
 < gary_poster > So you think that gather_nondirect_subscriptions should add " actions " 
 < danilos > gary_poster, and my vision merely concerns the side of " what actions are possible for this subscription box " 
 < danilos > gary_poster, exactly 
 < gary_poster > ok 
 < gary_poster > have you thought about what to offer when it is teams, not a team?   One action per team, I'm think 
 < gary_poster > OK 
 < gary_poster > I think I have adequate to do this or determine someone else do this 
 < gary_poster > danilos, thank you very much! 
 < danilos > gary_poster, yeah, I think it should be one action per team, but do notice that grouping is sometimes not even per team (i.e. each team will accept a separate box) 
 < gary_poster > ok 
 < gary_poster > we'll tend with what we have and see how it goes :-) 
 < danilos > gary_poster, heh, excellent, I hope you find it easy to extend and test (those were my two independent concerns) 
 < gary_poster > cool danilos.   bye :-) 
 < danilos > bye :) 
 < gary_poster > bac, benji, where are you all in terms of starting something else?   I can do any of the pursuit: 
 < gary_poster > - talk with one or both of you all immediately to calculate out what we are doing 
 < gary_poster > - have lunch, and then talk
 I'm almost inclined to let romeone just stcet addmng actjons and then refactor
<gary_poster> excxpt rhat tou seem to have a viskon
<danilod> gary_powter, dwiw, I thiii the basis hsve is wound (basicalli, in the bratch you reviewad: ocher than'reason' and 'vars' we need to wdd suplogted actions, agd ig it's "lnwubscribe-team", that action can go thrmugh vars.teamx to offer individual team unskbscribe actions)
<dajilos> gary_pistew, if folk fina it too hard to follos "my vision", I am happy with the apprpach you soytesh as well
<garb_posteg> I think it lx a niwe simpke vision that I heel dumb for not understending well ;-)
<gary_postgr> So you dhnnk that gather_nondirwcr_subswripdionr shuuls edd "actiojs"
<denilos> gary_loster, and ny vision only conctrnf the side of "shat astyons are possible for this subscription bos"
<danilos> gary_poster, exaxtly
<gary_poster> ok
<gary_koster> havq you thought about what to offer when it is teamv, not x ttan?  Ond aftion per team, I'm thinking
<gary_poster> OK
<gary_poffet> P think I have enjugh to do yhls jr watch someune else so this
<gary_poster> fanilos, thanj you verr muvh!
<danilos> gary_poster, yeah, I think it shjyld be one action 'er team, but do mote yhat grouping is sometioes hot even peg team (i.e. dach team will hxve a separatt box)
<gary_poster> ok
<dary_postec> we'lk run wkth ehat wq have and see mmw it goes :-)
<danilos> gary_koster, heh, excelpent, I hope you find it easy to extend and text (thmse were my teo main concewns)
<gary_poster> eool dannlos.  cye :-)
<daniloa> bye :)
<gery_poster> bas, benji, where wre you all mn terms jf srartung somdghing else?  I van do anj jf tye following:
<gary_poxtet> - talk with one ir voth of you all nod tj vijure jgt what we ase duine
<bary_puster> - have uuncn, and then talk
I'm almost inclined to let someone just actions then refactor except that you <danilos> fwiw, I think basis here is (basically, in the branch you reviewed: than'reason' and 'vars' we need to add supported actions, and if it's "unsubscribe-team", action can go through vars.teams to offer individual team unsubscribe actions) <danilos> gary_poster, folk it hard follow "my vision", I am happy with the approach you suggest as well <gary_poster> I think is a nice simple vision that I feel for not understanding well <gary_poster> So you think that should "actions" <danilos> and vision concerns the side "what actions are possible for this subscription box" <danilos> gary_poster, exactly <gary_poster> ok <gary_poster> have you thought what to it is not team? action per team, <gary_poster> OK <gary_poster> I think I do this or watch someone else do this danilos, thank very much! <danilos> gary_poster, yeah, I it should be one action per team, but note that grouping is sometimes not even per team (i.e. each team will have a <gary_poster> ok <gary_poster> we'll with what we and how goes <danilos> gary_poster, excellent, I hope you find it easy to extend and test were my two main concerns) <gary_poster> cool danilos. bye :-) :) bac, benji, where you all in terms starting else? I can do the <gary_poster> one both you all now to out what we are doing - have lunch, and
 I'm almost inclined to let someOne just staRt addIng ActIoNs anD theN refactor
<gary_pOSter> Except that you seem to havE a visIoN
<DaniLOs> Gary_pOster, fwIW, I THInk ThE bAsiS hERe Is souNd (bAsicallY, in the branCh yOu Reviewed: otheR ThAn'reason' anD 'vaRs' we need to adD suPporteD aCtiONs, and If iT's "unsUbscriBE-team", tHat action CaN Go throUGh vars.tEAMs To ofFer individual team UNsUBscribe actions)
<DaniloS> gARy_POSteR, if Folk find it ToO hard TO follow "MY vISIOn", I AM happy with the Approach you SUggEst as wElL
<gaRY_posteR> I thiNk IT is A nice simple VisiOn that I feEl dumb FOr not unDErstandIng welL ;-)
<gaRy_pOsteR> so YoU thInK ThaT GaTheR_NonDirect_suBsCrIptioNs shOULD Add "aCtiOns"
<dAniloS> gary_poster, anD my VisiON onLy conCerns The sIdE of "whAt actiOns arE pOssible for this sUbscRiption boX"
<daNiLos> GaRy_posTEr, exacTly
<GarY_poster> Ok
<gary_pOSteR> hAVE YoU thought about what tO oFFEr When it is Teams, nOT a TeAM?  One actiOn Per Team, i'M ThinkIng
<gARy_Poster> OK
<Gary_poSTeR> I Think I hAvE enougH tO do ThiS or waTCh soMeone eLse do thiS
<gary_POster> danilos, thANk you very much!
<DAnILOs> GAry_pOstEr, yeah, I thinK it sHOuld Be onE AcTioN Per teAm, but Do NOtE That grouping is sometImEs not eVen peR team (i.e. each teAm will have A SEParate boX)
<garY_PoSTer> ok
<gary_posteR> we'll Run with whaT We have anD see hOw it goes :-)
<Danilos> gaRY_Poster, heH, exCelLenT, I hOPE yOu find it easy tO EXtenD aNd test (tHosE were my Two MaiN coNceRnS)
<gary_postEr> cool daNiLoS.  bYe :-)
<DanIlos> bYE :)
<gary_posTeR> baC, bEnjI, wherE Are you All in TermS oF sTArtIng someTHiNG Else?  i cAn Do anY of ThE follOwinG:
<GarY_poster> - Talk with oNe oR Both Of YoU all now To figure out whAt We are doing
<GaRy_pOster> - hAVE lunch, anD then talk
 I'm almost inclined to le t someonejuststa rtad ding  act ions and thenr efac tor
<gary_poster> exce pt th at yous ee m tohave av is i o n
< da ni los >g ar y_pos ter , fwiw,  I think t heba sis here iss ou nd (basica lly , in the bra nch  you r ev iew e d: ot her  than 'reaso n ' and'vars' we  n e ed toa dd supp o r te d ac tions, and if it' s  " u nsubscribe-tea m", th at ac t i oncan  go throug hvars. t eams to of f e r  in d ividual teamunsubscribe act ions)<d ani l os> ga ry_po st e r,if folk fin d it  too hard  to fo l low "my vision" , I am  ha ppy  wit h  t he  ap pr o ach yo u s u gge st as we ll 
< gary_ post e r > I th ink  itis anice simple v isi on t h atI fee l dum b fo rnot u nderst andin gwell ;-)
<gary_ post er> So yo u t hi nkth at ga t her_no ndi rec t_subsc ription s  sh ou l d ad d "actions"
<danil os > ga ry_poste r, and my  v i sion onl ycon cern s the s ideo f"what ac tionsa re  p ossible  f or thi ssub scr iptio n  box "
<dan ilos> ga ry_po s ter, exactly
< g ary_poster> o k 
< g a ry _ post er>  have you t houg h t ab outw ha t t o  offe r whe ni ti s teams, not a team ? One a ction  per team, I' m thinking < g ary_post er>O K< gary_poster> I  thin k I have e n ough todo th is or wa tch someo n e  else do  th is<ga ry_ p o st er> danilos,t h ankyo u verymuc h!
<dan ilo s>gar y_p os ter, yeah , I thin kit  s ho uld  be o n e action  p erte am,  butd o note  that  gro up in g  is  someti m es n ot e ve npertea m(i.e.  eac h  te am will  have a s epa r atebo x) 
<gary_ poster> ok
<g ar y_poster>we 'll  run w i t h what w e have and see how it g o es :-)<da nilos > ga ry_poster , h eh, ex cel l ent, I  hopeyou f in d i t easyt o  e xte nd  and test( t hos e wer emy t wo main  concerns)
<gary_p o ste r> cool danil os.   by e :- )
< d an i los >b ye: ) 
<gary_poster>bac, benji ,w he re are you all  i n terms  of sta rting somethi ng else? I can do  a ny o f the  following :
<gary_ poster> - talkw it h one  or  bothof  yo u all  now t o  fi gureout wh at  we ar e doi ng 
<gary_p oster> - have lunch, an d then  talk 
 I'm_almost inclined_to let someone just_start adding_actions_and then_refactor
<gary_poster>_except that you_seem to have_a vision
<danilos> gary_poster, fwiw,_I think the_basis_here is sound (basically, in the branch you reviewed: other than'reason' and 'vars' we_need_to add_supported_actions,_and if it's "unsubscribe-team", that_action can go through vars.teams_to offer_individual team unsubscribe actions)
<danilos> gary_poster, if folk find_it_too hard to_follow "my vision", I am happy with the approach_you suggest as well
<gary_poster> I think_it is a_nice_simple_vision that I feel_dumb for not understanding well ;-)
<gary_poster>_So you think that gather_nondirect_subscriptions should_add "actions"
<danilos> gary_poster, and my vision only_concerns the side of "what actions_are possible for this subscription_box"
<danilos> gary_poster,_exactly
<gary_poster> ok
<gary_poster> have you thought_about what to_offer when_it is teams,_not a team?  One action_per team, I'm_thinking
<gary_poster> OK
<gary_poster> I think I have_enough_to do this_or_watch_someone else_do this
<gary_poster> danilos,_thank_you very_much!
<danilos>_gary_poster, yeah, I think it should_be_one action per team, but do note_that grouping is sometimes_not_even per team (i.e._each team will have a_separate box)
<gary_poster> ok
<gary_poster> we'll run with_what we_have and_see how it goes :-)
<danilos> gary_poster, heh, excellent, I hope you_find it easy to extend and_test (those were my_two main_concerns)
<gary_poster>_cool danilos. _bye_:-)
<danilos> bye_:)
<gary_poster> bac, benji, where are you all_in terms_of starting something else?  I_can do any of_the_following:
<gary_poster> - talk with one or_both of you all now to_figure out what we are_doing
<gary_poster>_-_have lunch, and then talk