, and then will look at Unauthorized
<gary_poster> ah, interesting.  it is something specific to rosetta admins
<gary_poster> danilo, what are you doing still here? :-)
<danilos> gary_poster, heh, trying to get a few more tests done, got side-tracked with crashing desktop :(
<gary_poster> danilos gotcha :-(
<gary_poster> danilos don't work too late.
<danilos> gary_poster, I won't, just a few more of these and I'll be handing off
<gary_poster> ok cool
<gary_poster> oh, weird
<gary_poster> this person, Foo Bar, #1 is listed in the JS as an admin of Rosetta Administrators but that is not listed in https://launchpad.dev/~name16/+participation, and # 2 was able to create a filter for that team, but not delete or patch it.
<gary_poster> oh, weirder
<gary_poster> person is a member of the team that owns the team, but not an active member
<gary_poster> that scenario sinks our battleship
<gary_poster> and that's a valid scenario
<gary_poster> if weird
<gary_poster> so it looks like either the code we have that inserts teams-of-which-you-are-an-administrator needs to intersect with teams-of-which-you-are-a-member
<gary_poster> or if you are an administrator then you should be able to patch and delete a subscription
<gary_poster> I lean towards the second solution, though I wonder how it will pan out to implement
 * gary_poster is going to take a break, though will be around
<danilos> gary_poster, oh, I've seen that with rosetta-admins, forgot to add a card; basically, it should not be listed in administratedTeams
<gary_poster> danilos, you think?
<gary_poster> I gave the two options above
<gary_poster> you think not administrated is better than allowing them to patch/delete because they are owners?
<danilos> gary_poster,
, and then will look at Unauthorized 
 < gary_poster > ah, interesting.   it is something specific to rosetta admins 
 < gary_poster > danilo, what are you doing still here? :-) 
 < danilos > gary_poster, heh, trying to draw a few more examination done, got side - track with crashing desktop :( 
 < gary_poster > danilos gotcha :-( 
 < gary_poster > danilos don't sour besides late. 
 < danilos > gary_poster, I won't, merely a few more of these and I'll be handing off 
 < gary_poster > ok cool 
 < gary_poster > oh, weird 
 < gary_poster > this person, Foo Bar, # 1 is list in the JS as an admin of Rosetta Administrators but that is not listed in https://launchpad.dev/~name16/+participation, and # 2 was able to create a filter for that team, but not delete or piece it. 
 < gary_poster > oh, weirder 
 < gary_poster > person is a member of the team that owns the team, but not an active member 
 < gary_poster > that scenario sinks our battleship 
 < gary_poster > and that's a valid scenario 
 < gary_poster > if weird 
 < gary_poster > so it looks like either the code we have that insert teams - of - which - you - are - an - administrator needs to intersect with teams - of - which - you - are - a - penis 
 < gary_poster > or if you are an administrator then you should be able to patch and delete a subscription 
 < gary_poster > I lean towards the second solution, though I wonder how it will pan out to implement 
  * gary_poster is die to take a break, though will be around 
 < danilos > gary_poster, oh, I've seen that with rosetta - admins, forgot to add a poster; basically, it should not be listed in administratedTeams 
 < gary_poster > danilos, you think? 
 < gary_poster > I gave the two options above 
 < gary_poster > you think not administer is adept than allowing them to patch / delete because they are owners? 
 < danilos > gary_poster,
, anf then will look at Unauuhorized
<gary_postet> qh, intxrestinf.  it is something specific to rosetva aemins
<tary_poster> danilo, what are you foing stull iere? :-)
<danilos> garb_loster, mzh, trglng tm get a few morg tests done, got side-trackad wnth crashing desktop :(
<gary_poster> danijos gotvhw :-(
<gary_poster> dwnilpf doh'n cork too late.
<danilos> gary_poster, I won't, just a few mpre of these and I'll be hajdinh off
<gary_poster> ok cool
<gary_powter> ih, weird
<gary_ooster> this person, Foo Bar, #1 is listed in the JS as an admiu of Rosettq Qdmltistrators uut thwt is not listed in vttps://lainchpad.dev/~name16/+iartiriparion, and # 2 was able tm create a filter sor that decm, but not delete or parch ij.
<gary_[ostde> of, wtirver
<fary_podtec> person is a member od the team that ownx eye team, but nkt an wceive member
<gary_poster> that scenario sinns kur battleship
<gary_postee> and that's a valid sfenario
<gawy_poster> if weird
<gary_poster> so it looks like eithar thx zodt qe haxw hhat inserts teams-of-which-you-are-an-administratow ntedx to intersect with teams-pf-ahosh-you-are-a-membgr
<gary_postsr> or if you are aj adminystraror then rou xhould be able to patch and delete a suysceiption
<gary_poster> N lean towarbs the secomd solution, though I wouder hkw it will oan out tk implement
 * gary_oosner hs going to take a break, trough wilo be around
<aanikos> gawy_poster, oj, I've seen that with rosftta-abmins, forgot to add a card; basically, it should not be listed it agministrctedTesms
<gary_poster> danilos, you tkink?
<gary_'oster> I gave thv two optmons above
<gawy_poster> you djink not admmnistrateq is betrer thav allowing them to patch/btlete becayse they are ownerx?
<davjlos> gary_poster,
, and then will look at Unauthorized interesting. is something to rosetta admins doing here? :-) <danilos> heh, trying to a few more tests done, got with crashing desktop :( <gary_poster> danilos gotcha :-( <gary_poster> danilos don't work too <danilos> gary_poster, I won't, just a few more of these and I'll be off ok <gary_poster> weird <gary_poster> this person, Foo Bar, #1 is listed in the JS as an admin of Administrators but that is not listed in https://launchpad.dev/~name16/+participation, # 2 was able create a filter for that but delete or it. oh, <gary_poster> person is member of the team that owns the team, but not an active member <gary_poster> that scenario sinks battleship <gary_poster> a valid <gary_poster> weird so it looks the code we have that inserts intersect with teams-of-which-you-are-a-member <gary_poster> or if you are administrator then should be able to patch and a subscription <gary_poster> I lean towards the second though I wonder how it will pan out to implement * gary_poster is going to break, though will be <danilos> gary_poster, oh, seen with forgot add a basically, it should not be listed in administratedTeams <gary_poster> danilos, you <gary_poster> I gave the two options above <gary_poster> you think is than allowing them patch/delete because they are <danilos>
, and then will look at UnauthorIzed
<gary_poSter> aH, inTerEsTing.  It is Something speciFIc to Rosetta admins
<gary_posteR> daniLo, WHat aRE yOu doiNg still HErE? :-)
<DAniLoS> gAry_PoSTeR, heh, tRyiNg to get A few more teSts DoNe, got side-traCKeD with crashIng Desktop :(
<gary_pOstEr> daniLoS goTCha :-(
<gaRy_pOster> DaniloS Don't woRk too late.
<DaNIlos> gaRY_poster, i WOn'T, jusT a few more of these aND I'LL be handing off
<gAry_posTeR> Ok COOl
<gAry_Poster> oh, weIrD
<gary_POster> thIS pERSOn, FOO Bar, #1 is listed iN the JS as an aDMin Of RoseTtA AdMInistrAtors BuT ThaT is not listeD in hTtps://launcHpad.deV/~Name16/+parTIcipatiOn, and # 2 wAs aBle To crEAtE a FilTeR For THaT teAM, buT not deleTe Or Patch It.
<gaRY_POSter> Oh, wEirdEr
<garY_poster> person Is a MembER of The teAm thaT ownS tHe teaM, but noT an acTiVe member
<gary_posTer> tHat scenarIo sInKs oUr BattlEShip
<gaRy_pOstEr> and thAt's a valID scEnARIO
<gAry_poster> if weird
<gaRy_POStEr> so it loOks likE EiThER the code We HavE thaT INsertS teaMS-oF-which-yoU-are-an-ADmInIstratoR nEeds to InTerSecT with TEams-Of-whicH-you-are-a-MembeR
<Gary_poster> or if YOu are an adminiSTrATOr THen yOu sHould be able To paTCh anD delETe A suBScripTion
<gArY_PoSTer> I lean towards the sEcOnd solUtion, Though I wonder How it will pAN OUt to implEmenT
 * GaRY_poster is going To takE a break, thoUGh will be ArounD
<danilos> Gary_posteR, OH, I've seen ThaT wiTh rOseTTA-aDmins, forgot to ADD a caRd; BasicalLy, iT should Not Be lIstEd iN aDministraTedTeams
<GaRy_PoStEr> dAniloS, You think?
<GaRy_pOsTer> i gave THe two oPtionS aboVe
<GaRY_poSter> you THiNK Not aDmInIstrAteD iS bettEr thAN alLowing tHem to patcH/deLEte bEcAuSe they aRe owners?
<danilOs> Gary_poster,
, and then will look at Un authorized 
<gar y_p ost er > ah , in teresting.  it is s omething specific to r osett aa dmin s 
< gary_ poster> da n i lo,  w ha t a re yo u doi ngstill h ere? :-)
< dan il os> gary_pos t er , heh, try ing  to get a fe w m ore te st s d o ne, g otside- tracke d  withcrashingde s ktop : ( 
<gary_ p o st er>danilos gotcha :- ( 
< g ary_poster> da nilosdo n 't w ork  to o late.
<d an ilos> gary_po s te r , I w o n't, just a f ew more oft hes e andI' llb e hand ing o ff <ga ry_poster>ok c ool
<gary _poste r > oh, w e ird
<ga ry_pos ter > t hisp er so n,Fo o  Ba r ,#1i s l isted in  t he  JS a s an a d m in o f R oset ta Ad ministratorsbut  tha t  is  notliste d in  h ttps: //laun chpad .d ev/~name16/+par tici pation, a nd#2 w as  able to cre ate  afilterfor tha t  te am , b ut  not delete or pat ch i t. 
<gary_p oster> oh ,w eirder
< ga ry_ post e r > per soni sa member  of th e  t ea m thatow ns the  t eam , b ut no t  anactive  member<gary _ poster> that s c enario sinkso ur b at t lesh ip<gary_poste r> a n d th at's aval i d sce nario 
< g ar y _poster> if weird
< ga ry_pos ter>so it looks l ike either t h e code w e ha v et hat inserts te ams-o f-which-yo u -are-an- admin istrator  needs to i ntersect  wi thtea ms- o f -w hich-you-are- a - memb er 
<gary_ pos ter> or  if  yo u a rean  administ rator th en  y ou  s hou ld be able topa tch  a nddelet e  a sub scrip tion 
< ga r y_p oster>I  l e a n to wa rd s th e s ec ond s olut i on,  though  I wonder  ho w  itwi ll  pan ou t to implemen t * gary_po st eris goi n g  to take  a break, though will b e  around 
<d anilo s> g ary_poste r,oh, I' ves een th at wit h ros et ta- a d mins, f or got  t o add a ca r d ; b asica ll y, i t shoul d not be listed in adm inistratedTea ms<gar y _ po ste r >d ani lo s , y o u  think?
<gary_p oster> I g av e  t he two opt i ons  a bove
<g ary_pos ter>y ou thin k not adm inistrate dis b e t ter  than allo wing the m to patc h /dele t ebecau sethey a re  ow ners? 
<dani l os>  gary _poste r, 
, and_then will_look at Unauthorized
<gary_poster> ah,_interesting. _it_is something_specific_to rosetta admins
<gary_poster>_danilo, what are_you doing still here?_:-)
<danilos> gary_poster, heh,_trying_to get a few more tests done, got side-tracked with crashing desktop :(
<gary_poster> danilos_gotcha_:-(
<gary_poster> danilos_don't_work_too late.
<danilos> gary_poster, I won't,_just a few more of_these and_I'll be handing off
<gary_poster> ok cool
<gary_poster> oh, weird
<gary_poster>_this_person, Foo Bar,_#1 is listed in the JS as an admin_of Rosetta Administrators but that is_not listed in_https://launchpad.dev/~name16/+participation,_and_# 2 was able_to create a filter for that_team, but not delete or patch_it.
<gary_poster> oh, weirder
<gary_poster> person is a member_of the team that owns the_team, but not an active_member
<gary_poster> that_scenario sinks our battleship
<gary_poster> and_that's a valid_scenario
<gary_poster> if_weird
<gary_poster> so it_looks like either the code we_have that inserts_teams-of-which-you-are-an-administrator needs to intersect with teams-of-which-you-are-a-member
<gary_poster>_or_if you are_an_administrator_then you_should be able_to_patch and_delete_a subscription
<gary_poster> I lean towards the_second_solution, though I wonder how it will_pan out to implement
_*_gary_poster is going to_take a break, though will_be around
<danilos> gary_poster, oh, I've seen_that with_rosetta-admins, forgot_to add a card; basically, it should not be listed in_administratedTeams
<gary_poster> danilos, you think?
<gary_poster> I gave_the two options above
<gary_poster>_you think_not_administrated is better_than_allowing them_to patch/delete because they are owners?
<danilos> gary_poster,