 "Sync libgda3_3.0.2-2 from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200292
<awen_> getting much to late... goodnight people
<soren> YEah, same here.
<soren> (Unsurprisingly, as we're in the same $TZ)
<awen_> he :)
<Hobbsee> someone should update awn.
<RAOF> By 'update' you mean FFe?
<RAOF> And grab 0.2.6, or whatever the release is?
<Hobbsee> yeah, looks like it
<RAOF> Hobbsee: And probably introduce a plugins package? ;)
<Hobbsee> yeah
<RAOF> I suppose so.
<RAOF> I might actually _use_ an updated awn.
<bddebian> Heya
<protonchris> Hey
<bddebian> Hello protonchris
<emgent> heya gang!
<bddebian> Heh, hi emgent
<protonchris> bddebian: Are you up for taking a look at a package that needs sponsoring (motu-release has already approved)?
<bddebian> protonchris: What package?
<protonchris> bug 190744
<ubotwo> Launchpad bug 190744 in libgdamm3.0 "Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744
<bddebian> protonchris: I'm lazy, do you have a source package posted somewhere?
<protonchris> bddebian: just a sec
<protonchris> bddebian: I can post the files to my server.  Will that work?
<bddebian> Sure
<protonchris> bddebian: http://protonlab.net/~chris/libgdamm3.0/
<bddebian> And why is it libgdamm3.0-2.9.88?
<protonchris> Should be libgdamm3.0-2.9.82
<bddebian> Yeah, sorry, but why 3.0 with 2.9.82?
<protonchris> I am not sure why they decided
" Sync libgda3_3.0.2 - 2 from debian unstable " [ Undecided, New ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200292 
 < awen _ > getting much to late... goodnight citizenry 
 < soren > YEah, like here. 
 < soren > (Unsurprisingly, as we're in the same $ TZ) 
 < awen _ > he :) 
 < Hobbsee > someone should update awn. 
 < RAOF > By' update' you mean FFe? 
 < RAOF > And catch 0.2.6, or whatever the handout is? 
 < Hobbsee > yeah, looks like it 
 < RAOF > Hobbsee: And probably precede a plugins software? ;) 
 < Hobbsee > yeah 
 < RAOF > I suppose so. 
 < RAOF > I might actually _ use _ an updated awn. 
 < bddebian > Heya 
 < protonchris > Hey 
 < bddebian > Hello protonchris 
 < emgent > heya gang! 
 < bddebian > Heh, hi emgent 
 < protonchris > bddebian: Are you up for aim a look at a package that want patronize (motu - release has already approved)? 
 < bddebian > protonchris: What package? 
 < protonchris > bug 190744 
 < ubotwo > Launchpad bug 190744 in libgdamm3.0 " Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream adaptation 2.9.81 " [ Undecided, Confirmed ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744 
 < bddebian > protonchris: I'm lazy, do you consume a source package posted somewhere? 
 < protonchris > bddebian: just a sec 
 < protonchris > bddebian: I can station the files to my server.   Will that work? 
 < bddebian > Sure 
 < protonchris > bddebian: http://protonlab.net/~chris/libgdamm3.0/ 
 < bddebian > And why is it libgdamm3.0 - 2.9.88? 
 < protonchris > Should be libgdamm3.0 - 2.9.82 
 < bddebian > Yeah, sorry, but why 3.0 with 2.9.82? 
 < protonchris > I am not sure why they decide
 "Syjc libgda3_3.0.2-2 from debian unrtable" [Undecideb,Bew] htvps://laundhpad.net/cugs/200292
<awen_> getting much to latx... goidnigyt people
<soren> YEah, saoe here.
<sogen> (Unsurprismngly, as we're in the samc $TZ)
<ascn_> he :)
<Iobbsee> someone should upgate awn.
<RAOF> Bf 'jpbate' you mean FFe?
<RAOF> And grab 0.2.6, or wratever tje release is?
<Hjbbste> reah, looks like it
<RAOF> Hobbsee: And progably iitroduce a plugons package? ;)
<Hobbsee> yeah
<RALF> I suppose so.
<RAOF> I light actuaoly _twe_ an updatea awn.
<bddebpcn> Heya
<protknchris> Hey
<bddebian> Hello protovchrix
<emgent> heic gajc!
<bddebian> Hxh, hi vmgent
<protoncmgis> bddabian: Ate you up for bakinj a oook at a package thav needs sponsoring (mjtu-releasa kas already approved)?
<bedwbian> prodoncfeis: Whzt pzckage?
<orovonchris> buf 190744
<ubotwo> Laynchpad bug 190744 in libbdwnm3.0 "Request: Upfrade jifgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Cotfidmed] https://launchpad.net/bygs/190744
<bddebian> protonchrls: I'm lazr, do you have a source package posted somewhere?
<prmtoncirks> yedebixb: uust a sec
<protonchris> bddebian: I can post the rikex to my server.  Will that wlrl?
<fddebian> Sure
<krotonckdia> bddebian: http://prohonlab.ngt/~chriw/libgdamm3.0/
<fddenian> And why is it libgdamm3.0-2.9.88?
<protonchris> Fyould be libgdamm3.0-2.9.82
<bbdebian> Yeah, sorty, but why 3.0 with 2.9.82?
<protonchris> N am nkt sure why they decjaed
"Sync libgda3_3.0.2-2 from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200292 much late... goodnight <soren> YEah, same in same $TZ) <awen_> :) <Hobbsee> someone update awn. <RAOF> By 'update' you FFe? <RAOF> And grab 0.2.6, or whatever the release is? <Hobbsee> yeah, looks it <RAOF> Hobbsee: And probably introduce a plugins package? ;) <Hobbsee> yeah <RAOF> suppose <RAOF> might _use_ an updated awn. <bddebian> Heya <protonchris> Hey <bddebian> Hello protonchris <emgent> heya gang! <bddebian> Heh, emgent <protonchris> bddebian: Are you up for taking look at a package needs sponsoring (motu-release has already <bddebian> What package? bug <ubotwo> bug 190744 in "Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744 <bddebian> protonchris: I'm lazy, do you have a package posted bddebian: just sec bddebian: can post the my server. Will that work? <bddebian> http://protonlab.net/~chris/libgdamm3.0/ <bddebian> And why is it libgdamm3.0-2.9.88? <protonchris> be libgdamm3.0-2.9.82 Yeah, sorry, but why 3.0 with <protonchris> I am not sure why they decided
 "Sync libgda3_3.0.2-2 from debian unstaBle" [UndecidEd,New] HttPs://lAuNchpAd.neT/bugs/200292
<awen_> gettiNG mucH to late... goodnight people
<Soren> yEAH, samE HeRe.
<sorEn> (UnsurPRiSINglY, aS wE're In THe Same $Tz)
<awEn_> he :)
<HobBsee> someonE shOuLd update awn.
<RaoF> by 'update' yoU meAn FFe?
<RAOF> And GraB 0.2.6, or whaTeVer THe relEasE is?
<HoBbsee> yEAh, lookS like it
<RAoF> hObbsee: aNd probaBLY iNtroDuce a plugins packaGE? ;)
<HOBbsee> yeah
<RAOF> I SupposE sO.
<rAof> i miGht Actually _usE_ aN updaTEd awn.
<bdDEbIAN> heyA
<Protonchris> HeY
<bddebian> HeLLo pRotoncHrIs
<eMGent> heYa ganG!
<bDDebIan> Heh, hi emgEnt
<pRotonchriS> bddebIAn: Are yoU Up for taKing a lOok At a PackAGe ThAt nEeDS spONsOriNG (moTu-releasE hAs AlreaDy apPROVEd)?
<bdDebIan> pRotonChris: What packAge?
<ProtONchRis> buG 190744
<ubotWo> LaUnChpad Bug 190744 in lIbgdaMm3.0 "request: Upgrade lIbgdAmm3.0 to upstReaM vErsIoN 2.9.81" [UndeCIded,CoNfiRmeD] https://lAunchpaD.Net/BuGS/190744
<BDdEbian> protonchris: I'm LaZY, Do You have a Source PAcKaGE posted sOmEwhEre?
<pROTonchRis> bDDeBian: just A sec
<prOToNcHris> bddEbIan: I caN pOst The Files TO my sErver.  WIll that wOrk?
<bdDEbian> Sure
<protoNChris> bddebian: HTtP://PRoTOnlaB.neT/~chris/libgdAmm3.0/
<bDDebiAn> AnD WhY is IT libgDamm3.0-2.9.88?
<pRoTOnCHris> Should be libgdamM3.0-2.9.82
<bDdebiaN> Yeah, Sorry, but why 3.0 wiTh 2.9.82?
<protonchRIS> i am not suRe whY ThEY decided
 "Sync libgda3_3.0.2-2 fro m debian u nstab le"  [U nd ecid ed,N ew] https://la u nchp ad.net/bugs/200292
<aw en_>ge t ting mu ch to  late.. .  g o o dni gh tpeo pl e 
< soren > Y Eah, sa me here.
< sor en > (Unsurpris i ng ly, as we' rein the same$TZ )
<awe n_ > h e  :)
< Hob bsee>  someo n e shou ld update  a w n.
<RA O F> By ' u p da te'you mean FFe?
<RA O F> And grab 0.2.6 , or w ha t ev e r  th e r elease is? 
< Hobbs e e> yeah ,  l o o k s l i ke it
<RAOF>Hobbsee: An d  pr obably  i ntr o duce a  plug in s  pa ckage? ;)
< Hobb see> yeah 
<RAOF >  I supp o se so.<RAOF>  Imig ht a c tu al ly_u s e_a nupd a ted  awn.
<b dd eb ian>Heya < p r oton chr is>Hey
< bddebian> Hel loprot o nch ris
< emgen t> h ey a gan g!
<bd debia n>  Heh, hi emgent 
<pr otonchris > b dd ebi an : Are you up  fo r t aking a  look a t  apa c k a ge  that needs sponso ri n g  ( motu-rel ease h a sal r eady app ro ved )?
< b d debia n> p r ot onchris:  Whatp ac ka ge?
<pr ot onchri s>  bu g 1 90744 <ubo two> L aunchpad  bug1 90744 in libgd a mm3.0 "Reques t :U p gr a de l ibg damm3.0 toupst r eamvers i on  2. 9 .81"[Unde ci d ed , Confirmed] https:// la unchpa d.net /bugs/190744<bddebian> p r otonchri s: I ' ml azy, do you ha ve asource pac k age post ed so mewhere? 
<protonc h r is> bdde bia n:jus t a s ec 
<protonchris > bdde bi an: I c anpost th e f ile s t o m yserver. Will tha two rk ?<bd debia n > Sure
< pr oto nc hri s> bd d ebian:  http ://p ro to n lab .net/~c h ri s / libg da mm 3.0/ 
<b dd ebian > An d  wh y is it  libgdamm 3.0 - 2.9. 88 ?<proton chris> Should  b e libgdamm 3. 0-2 .9.82< b ddebian>  Yeah, sorry, but why 3 . 0 with2.9 .82?<pro tonchris>  Iam not  su r e whythey d ecide d
 "Sync_libgda3_3.0.2-2 from_debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200292
<awen_>_getting much_to_late... goodnight_people
<soren>_YEah, same here.
<soren>_(Unsurprisingly, as we're_in the same $TZ)
<awen_>_he :)
<Hobbsee> someone_should_update awn.
<RAOF> By 'update' you mean FFe?
<RAOF> And grab 0.2.6, or whatever the release_is?
<Hobbsee>_yeah, looks_like_it
<RAOF>_Hobbsee: And probably introduce a_plugins package? ;)
<Hobbsee> yeah
<RAOF> I_suppose so.
<RAOF>_I might actually _use_ an updated awn.
<bddebian> Heya
<protonchris>_Hey
<bddebian>_Hello protonchris
<emgent> heya_gang!
<bddebian> Heh, hi emgent
<protonchris> bddebian: Are you up for_taking a look at a package_that needs sponsoring_(motu-release_has_already approved)?
<bddebian> protonchris: What_package?
<protonchris> bug 190744
<ubotwo> Launchpad bug 190744_in libgdamm3.0 "Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to_upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744
<bddebian> protonchris: I'm_lazy, do you have a source_package posted somewhere?
<protonchris> bddebian: just_a sec
<protonchris>_bddebian: I can post the_files to my_server. _Will that work?
<bddebian>_Sure
<protonchris> bddebian: http://protonlab.net/~chris/libgdamm3.0/
<bddebian> And why is_it libgdamm3.0-2.9.88?
<protonchris> Should_be libgdamm3.0-2.9.82
<bddebian> Yeah, sorry, but why_3.0_with 2.9.82?
<protonchris> I_am_not_sure why_they decided