-somerville> LaserJock, The ubuntu delta is just a rebuild
<Fujitsu> Why did the archive have to freeze right before we do a lot of uploads for the gfortran transition?
<james_w> cody-somerville: ah, ok. Does that need a session, it's just a sync isn't it?
<cody-somerville> Right
<cody-somerville> I filed several sync requests today
<cody-somerville> But there are still more that should be synced
<LaserJock> is MoM still running?
<cody-somerville> I think so, yes.
<james_w> LaserJock: last I looked, yes
<LaserJock> that's where the "RC bugs fixed in Debian but not in Ubuntu" list is good
<LaserJock> we need to be able to prioritize which stuff to grab
<james_w> that's a list worth looking at.
 * cody-somerville nods.
<cody-somerville> but qa.ubuntuwire.com is down :(
<Fujitsu> LaserJock, cody-somerville: I don't believe that was ever being updated for Hardy, anyway.
<cody-somerville> Fujitsu, It had good enough regardless
<james_w> so it's the list of out of date packages in Ubuntu where the debian uploads since the last included version fixed an RC bug?
<Fujitsu> Indeed. We really need to track down imbrandon.
<Fujitsu> james_w: That's correct.
<sistpoty> nixternal: please ping an archive admin, once the new package has been uploaded (bug #196123)
<ubotu> Launchpad bug 196123 in ubuntu "[FFe] keurocalc port to kde4" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196123
<Fujitsu> Unfortunately, it relies on someone rsyncing from the BTS, which means it needs a DD.
<james_w> is the SOAP or ldap interface not good enough? Or is the problem DOSing the BTS?
<Fujitsu> I believe it needs to check every bug, so it'd be a fairly effective DoS.
<
-somerville > LaserJock, The ubuntu delta is just a rebuild 
 < Fujitsu > Why did the archive have to freeze right before we do a fortune of uploads for the gfortran passage? 
 < james_w > cody - somerville: ah, ok. Does that need a session, it's just a sync isn't it? 
 < cody - somerville > Right 
 < cody - somerville > I file several sync requests today 
 < cody - somerville > But there be even more that should be synced 
 < LaserJock > is ma however running? 
 < cody - somerville > I intend so, yes. 
 < james_w > LaserJock: last I look, yes 
 < LaserJock > that's where the " RC bugs fixed in Debian but not in Ubuntu " list is good 
 < LaserJock > we need to be able to prioritize which stuff to catch 
 < james_w > that's a list worth looking at. 
  * cody - somerville nod. 
 < cody - somerville > but qa.ubuntuwire.com is down :( 
 < Fujitsu > LaserJock, cody - somerville: I don't believe that was ever being updated for Hardy, anyway. 
 < cody - somerville > Fujitsu, It have good enough regardless 
 < james_w > so it's the list of out of date packages in Ubuntu where the debian uploads since the last included interpretation fixed an RC bug? 
 < Fujitsu > Indeed. We really need to track down imbrandon. 
 < Fujitsu > james_w: That's correct. 
 < sistpoty > nixternal: please ping an archive admin, once the new package has been uploaded (bug # 196123) 
 < ubotu > Launchpad bug 196123 in ubuntu " [ FFe ] keurocalc port to kde4 " [ Undecided, Confirmed ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196123 
 < Fujitsu > Unfortunately, it relies on someone rsyncing from the BTS, which means it needs a DD. 
 < james_w > is the SOAP or ldap interface not full enough? Or is the problem DOSing the BTS? 
 < Fujitsu > I think it need to match every bug, so it'd be a fairly effective DoS. 
 <
-somfrville> LaserJock, The ubmntu delta is just a reuuild
<Funitsu> Whh did the archive have to frxeze righu before we do a log of uplowds for rhe jfortran transitmkn?
<james_w> cody-almerriole: ah, ok. Does that need a session, it's jjsc a sync isn't it?
<cody-somerville> Right
<sody-somrrgille> I filed fevegaj syhb vequests today
<cody-somerville> But there ere still more yhat should be synced
<LaserUock> is MoM still runnlng?
<cody-sometbiljw> I think so, yes.
<james_w> LaserJock: lzst I looked, yes
<LaserJock> that's wherz the "RC buts fidgd in Debian but got in Ubuntm" list hs good
<KaserJock> we nced tm bw able to prioritize xhich stuff to grab
<jwmes_w> thad's a list worth loojibg at.
 * cogy-soowrvkllt npda.
<cody-slmecville> but sa.ubuntuwirw.com is down :(
<Fujitsi> JqserJock, cody-aomervylje: I don't believe that was ever being ukdates for Hardy, anyway.
<cody-simerville> Fujitsu, It jad good qnough regardless
<james_w> so it's the list of out of date oacjanes kb Kbuntu where the debian uploads since the lase imckuded version nixed an RC bug?
<Fujotdu> Yndeed. We reauly nezs fo track down imbrwndon.
<Futitsu> james_w: Trat's correct.
<sistpoty> nixternal: please ping cn qrchive admin, once the new paekage nas bren uploaded (bug #196123)
<ubotu> Uaundhpad bug 196123 ln ubuntu "[WFe] keurocalc poft no kge4" [Undecided,Confirmed] httpf://launchpav.net/bbgs/196123
<Fujitru> Umfortugately, it gelies on someone rsyncijg frlm the BTS, wjich means it needs a DD.
<james_w> mx the SOAP ot lgap interfaee not good enough? Jr is the probkem DOSnng thd BTS?
<Fujitau> I benieve it neqds to check agery bug, so mt'd be a sairoy edfectivd DoS.
<
-somerville> LaserJock, The ubuntu delta is just <Fujitsu> did the have to freeze lot uploads for the transition? <james_w> cody-somerville: ok. Does that need a session, just a sync isn't it? <cody-somerville> Right <cody-somerville> I filed several sync requests <cody-somerville> But there are still more that should be synced <LaserJock> is MoM running? I so, <james_w> LaserJock: last I looked, yes <LaserJock> that's where the "RC bugs fixed in Debian but in Ubuntu" list is good <LaserJock> we need be able to prioritize stuff to grab <james_w> that's list looking at. cody-somerville <cody-somerville> qa.ubuntuwire.com is down <Fujitsu> LaserJock, cody-somerville: I don't believe that was ever being updated for Hardy, anyway. <cody-somerville> Fujitsu, It good enough so it's list out date packages in the debian uploads since the last an RC bug? <Fujitsu> Indeed. We really need track down <Fujitsu> james_w: That's correct. <sistpoty> nixternal: ping an archive admin, once the new package been uploaded (bug #196123) <ubotu> Launchpad bug 196123 in ubuntu "[FFe] keurocalc port to kde4" <Fujitsu> Unfortunately, it relies someone rsyncing from BTS, means needs DD. <james_w> the SOAP or ldap interface not good enough? Or is the DOSing the BTS? <Fujitsu> I believe it needs to check so be a fairly DoS. <
-somerville> LaserJock, The ubuNtu delta is Just a RebUilD
<FUjitSu> WhY did the archive HAve tO freeze right before we do A lot oF uPLoadS FoR the gFortran TRaNSItiOn?
<JaMes_W> cODy-SomerVilLe: ah, ok. DOes that neeD a sEsSion, it's just a SYnC isn't it?
<codY-soMerville> RighT
<coDy-someRvIllE> i fileD seVeral Sync reQUests tOday
<cody-sOmERville> bUt there ARE sTill More that should be sYNcED
<LaserJock> is Mom still RuNNiNG?
<CodY-soMerville> I tHiNk so, yES.
<james_w> lAsERjOck: LAst I looked, yes
<laserJock> thAT's wHere thE "Rc buGS fixed In DebIaN But Not in Ubuntu" List Is good
<LasErJock> WE need to BE able to PrioriTizE whIch sTUfF tO grAb
<JAmeS_W> tHat'S A liSt worth lOoKiNg at.
 * cOdy-sOMERVillE noDs.
<coDy-somErville> but qa.uBunTuwiRE.coM is doWn :(
<FujItsu> laSerJoCk, cody-SomerViLle: I don't believe That Was ever beIng UpDatEd For HaRDy, anywAy.
<cOdy-SomerviLle> FujiTSu, IT hAD GOoD enough regardless
<jAmES_W> sO it's the lIst of oUT oF dATe packagEs In UBuntU WHere tHe deBIaN uploads Since tHE lAsT includEd VersioN fIxeD an rC bug?
<fUjitSu> IndeEd. We realLy neeD To track down imbRAndon.
<Fujitsu> jAMeS_W: thAT's coRreCt.
<sistpoty> nIxteRNal: pLeasE PiNg aN ArchiVe admIn, ONcE The new package has beeN uPloadeD (bug #196123)
<uBotu> Launchpad Bug 196123 in ubuntU "[ffE] keurocaLc poRT tO Kde4" [Undecided,CoNfirmEd] https://lauNChpad.net/Bugs/196123
<FUjitsu> UnFortunateLY, It relies On sOmeOne RsyNCInG from the BTS, whICH meaNs It needs A DD.
<James_w> iS thE SOaP oR ldAp Interface Not good eNoUgH? OR iS thE probLEm DOSing ThE BTs?
<FUjiTsu> I bELieve iT needS to cHeCk EVerY bug, so iT'D bE A FairLy EfFectIve dos.
<
-somerville> LaserJock, Th e ubuntu d eltaisjus ta re buil d
<Fujitsu> Wh y  did  the archive have to f reeze  r i ghtb ef ore w e do al ot o f u pl oa dsfo r  t he gf ort ran tra nsition?
< jam es _w> cody-som e rv ille: ah,ok.  Does that n eed  a ses si on, it'sjus t a s ync is n 't it? 
<cody-so me r ville> Right
< c o dy -som erville> I fileds ev e ral sync reque sts to da y 
< c o dy- som erville> B ut  ther e  are st i ll m o ret hat should be  synced
<La s erJ ock> i sMoM stillrunni ng ? 
<c ody-somervi lle>  I thinkso, ye s .
<jame s _w> Las erJock : l ast  I l o ok ed , y es <La s er Joc k > t hat's wh er ethe " RC b u g s fixe d i n De bianbut not in Ub unt u" l i stis go od
<L aser Jo ck> w e need  to b eable to priorit izewhich stu ffto  gr ab 
<jam e s_w> t hat 'sa listworth l o oki ng a t . * cody-somerville  n o d s. 
<cody-s omervi l le >b ut qa.ub un tuw ire. c o m isdown :( 
<Fujits u> Las e rJ oc k, cody -s omervi ll e:I d on'tb elie ve tha t was ev er be i ng updated for Hardy, anyway . 
< c o dy - some rvi lle> Fujits u, I t  had  goo d  e nou g h reg ardle ss <j a mes_w> so it's theli st ofout o f date packag es in Ubun t u where th e de b ia n  uploads since  thelast inclu d ed versi on fi xed an R C bug?
<F u j itsu> In dee d.Werea l l yneed to track d ownim brandon .
< Fujitsu > j ame s_w : T ha t's corre ct.
<sis tp ot y>  n ixt ernal :  pleasepi ngan  ar chive admin,  once  the  n ew pac kage ha s  b e e n up lo ad ed ( bug  # 19612 3)
< u bot u> Laun chpad bug  19 6 123in  u buntu " [FFe] keuroca lc  port to k de 4"[Undec i d ed,Confi rmed] https://launchpad . net/bug s/1 96123 
<Fu jitsu> Un for tunate ly, it rel ies on  some on e r s y ncing f ro m t he  BTS, whic h mea ns it  n eeds  a DD.<james_w> is the S O APor ldap inter fac e no t go ode no u gh?  O r  is t he problem DOSi ng the BTS ?< Fu jitsu> I b e lie ve  it nee ds to c hecke very bu g, so it' d be a fa ir ly e f f ect ive DoS.
< 
-somerville> LaserJock,_The ubuntu_delta is just a_rebuild
<Fujitsu> Why_did_the archive_have_to freeze right_before we do_a lot of uploads_for the gfortran_transition?
<james_w>_cody-somerville: ah, ok. Does that need a session, it's just a sync isn't it?
<cody-somerville>_Right
<cody-somerville>_I filed_several_sync_requests today
<cody-somerville> But there are_still more that should be_synced
<LaserJock> is_MoM still running?
<cody-somerville> I think so, yes.
<james_w> LaserJock:_last_I looked, yes
<LaserJock>_that's where the "RC bugs fixed in Debian but_not in Ubuntu" list is good
<LaserJock>_we need to_be_able_to prioritize which stuff_to grab
<james_w> that's a list worth_looking at.
 * cody-somerville nods.
<cody-somerville> but_qa.ubuntuwire.com is down :(
<Fujitsu> LaserJock, cody-somerville: I_don't believe that was ever being_updated for Hardy, anyway.
<cody-somerville> Fujitsu,_It had_good enough regardless
<james_w> so it's_the list of_out of_date packages in_Ubuntu where the debian uploads since_the last included_version fixed an RC bug?
<Fujitsu> Indeed._We_really need to_track_down_imbrandon.
<Fujitsu> james_w:_That's correct.
<sistpoty> nixternal:_please_ping an_archive_admin, once the new package has_been_uploaded (bug #196123)
<ubotu> Launchpad bug 196123 in_ubuntu "[FFe] keurocalc port_to_kde4" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196123
<Fujitsu> Unfortunately,_it relies on someone rsyncing_from the BTS, which means it_needs a_DD.
<james_w> is_the SOAP or ldap interface not good enough? Or is the_problem DOSing the BTS?
<Fujitsu> I believe_it needs to check_every bug,_so_it'd be a_fairly_effective DoS.
<