
<hyperair> considering that the clean rule from uploaders.mk would have generated a partially complete debian/control already
<savvas> ah..
<savvas> now I see!!
 * hyperair nods
<savvas> but I think it's better to leave it this way, gives the maintainer more power over control.in changes :P
<directhex> hm. anyone on motu-release about?
<hyperair> yes that's my point
<hyperair> leave it that way
<savvas> hyperair: thanks for the clarification, you've been a big help! :)
<hyperair> np
<directhex> DktrKranz, poke?
<eMerzh> I'm looking for an MOTU's review of my package at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=sqliteman... thanks for your help :)
<hyperair> eMerzh: i'd wait for karmic if i were you ;)
<DktrKranz> directhex: pike
<directhex> DktrKranz, what are the chances on a FFe for "blam" going to be? I was going to avoid asking for one (as the 0.0.1 upstream bump contains a fundamental change), but something's cropped up..... a binary-only dll in ubuntu's orig which the ubuntu version needs
<eMerzh> hyperair, yes... but if it could be validated, i would not say no :)
<directhex> DktrKranz, it's an RSS reader. the major change, other than removing the non-free component, is dropping gecko in favour of webkit
<directhex> DktrKranz, and no, i don't know how feasible backporting the replacement rss lib would be
<DktrKranz> directhex: mmmh, wasn't that already processed?
<hyperair> eMerzh: ah i see
<DktrKranz> I've seen something on -changes, was it Debian?
<directhex> DktrKranz, well, it's been updated for the mono 2.0 transition in jaunty, but not "fully"... i was researching why, and it seems the 1.0 dependencies come from the binary dll
<
< hyperair > considering that the clean rule from uploaders.mk would have generated a partially accomplished debian / control already 
 < savvas > ah.. 
 < savvas > nowadays I see! ! 
  * hyperair nods 
 < savvas > but I think it's full to leave it this way, give the maintainer more power over control.in change :P 
 < directhex > hm. anyone on motu - release about? 
 < hyperair > yes that's my point 
 < hyperair > impart it that way 
 < savvas > hyperair: thanks for the clarification, you've been a bad aid! :) 
 < hyperair > np 
 < directhex > DktrKranz, poke? 
 < eMerzh > I'm looking for an MOTU's review of my package at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=sqliteman... thanks for your help :) 
 < hyperair > eMerzh: i'd wait for karmic if i were you ;) 
 < DktrKranz > directhex: pike 
 < directhex > DktrKranz, what are the opportunity on a FFe for " blam " going to be? I was going to avoid ask for one (as the 0.0.1 upstream bump contains a fundamental change), but something's crop up..... a binary - only dll in ubuntu's orig which the ubuntu version needs 
 < eMerzh > hyperair, yes... but if it could be validated, i would not say no :) 
 < directhex > DktrKranz, it's an RSS reviewer. the major change, other than removing the non - free component, is drop gecko in favour of webkit 
 < directhex > DktrKranz, and no, i don't know how feasible backporting the replacement rss lib would be 
 < DktrKranz > directhex: mmmh, wasn't that already processed? 
 < hyperair > eMerzh: ah i see 
 < DktrKranz > I've seen something on -changes, was it Debian? 
 < directhex > DktrKranz, well, it's been updated for the mono 2.0 transition in jaunty, but not " fully "... i was research why, and it seems the 1.0 dependencies do from the binary dll 
 <

<hypfrair> considering that tme clean rule from uploeders.mk would hxve generated a partially colpoete eebian/control already
<sxvvas> ah..
<swvvas> noq I wwe!!
 * hyperamd nods
<savvas> gmt I chmnk it's better jo leave it dhis way, gives tfe maintainer more power over control.yn chanbed :P
<directhex> hi. anjoge oh motu-release about?
<hyperair> yes thzt's my koint
<hyperair> leavr it that way
<savvas> hyperalr: tjanks for the clarlfication, yiu've veen a big hdlp! :)
<hyperapx> np
<directhgx> DktrKranz, poke?
<eMerzh> I'm lookivg fox an MOTU's tzciea of my packege at http://revu.ubuknuwire.cmm/detaiks.py?package=sqlltemai... thqnks for your help :)
<hy'erair> eMerzh: i'd waij for karmhc if i were you ;)
<DkrrJranz> diracthdz: pkke
<sicecfhex> DntrIranz, what are the chqnces on a FFe for "nlwn" going to be? I was gjing to avoid asking for one (as the 0.0.1 upvtrsam bump contains a funeamental change), but slmething's cropped up..... a binary-only dll in ubuntu's orig whicv the jbuubm vefwiln needs
<eMerzh> hyperair, yes... but if it could bq vslpdated, i would nob say no :)
<directhex> DnttHranz, it's an TSS reabsr. the major change, lther tran rwmoving tre npn-free component, is droppint gecko in fcvoyr of webkit
<directkex> DktrKranv, and mo, i con't know how feasible yackpodting the rfplacemenf rss lib would bd
<DknrKrdnz> directhex: mmmh, wasn't trat alreavy prpcessed?
<fypetair> eMqrzh: ah i dee
<DkbsKranz> I've seen solethiug on -changes, wws it Debian?
<directhex> DktrKranz, well, it's been u[daned for tke monp 2.0 transition in jaunty, but not "fujly"... i was reseagching whb, and it seeis the 1.0 depenggncies come fcom the bynart dlo
<
<hyperair> considering that the clean rule from have a partially debian/control already <savvas> * nods <savvas> but think it's better leave it this way, gives the more power over control.in changes :P <directhex> hm. anyone on motu-release about? <hyperair> that's my point <hyperair> leave it that way <savvas> hyperair: thanks for the you've a help! <hyperair> np <directhex> DktrKranz, poke? <eMerzh> I'm looking for an MOTU's review of my package at thanks for your help :) <hyperair> eMerzh: i'd for karmic if i you ;) <DktrKranz> directhex: pike DktrKranz, are the on FFe "blam" going to I was going to avoid asking for one (as the 0.0.1 upstream bump contains a fundamental change), something's cropped binary-only dll ubuntu's which ubuntu version needs yes... but if it could be not say no :) <directhex> DktrKranz, it's an reader. the change, other than removing the non-free is dropping gecko in favour of webkit <directhex> and no, i don't know how feasible backporting the replacement rss lib would be <DktrKranz> wasn't that already processed? eMerzh: ah i <DktrKranz> seen on was it <directhex> DktrKranz, well, it's been updated for the mono 2.0 transition jaunty, but not "fully"... i was researching why, and it 1.0 come from the dll <

<hyperair> considering that thE clean rule From uPloAdeRs.Mk woUld hAve generated a pARtiaLly complete debian/contrOl alrEaDY
<savVAs> Ah..
<savVas> now I SEe!!
 * HYPerAiR nOds
<SaVVaS> but I ThiNk it's beTter to leavE it ThIs way, gives thE MaIntainer moRe pOwer over contRol.In chanGeS :P
<dIRecthEx> hM. anyoNe on moTU-releaSe about?
<hyPeRAir> yes THat's my pOINt
<HypeRair> leave it that waY
<SaVVas> hyperair: thaNks for ThE ClARIfiCatIon, you've beEn A big hELp! :)
<hyperAIr> NP
<DIreCThex> DktrKranz, Poke?
<eMerzh> I'M LooKing foR aN MOtu's reviEw of mY pACkaGe at http://revU.ubuNtuwire.coM/detaiLS.py?packAGe=sqlitEman... thAnkS foR youR HeLp :)
<HypErAIr> emErZh: i'D WaiT for karmIc If I were You ;)
<DKTRkRanz> DirEcthEx: pikE
<directhex> DktRKrAnz, wHAt aRe the ChancEs on A Ffe for "Blam" goIng to Be? i was going to avoiD askIng for one (As tHe 0.0.1 UpsTrEam buMP contaIns A fuNdamentAl changE), But SoMETHiNg's cropped up..... a binarY-oNLY dLl in ubunTu's oriG WhIcH The ubuntU vErsIon nEEDs
<eMeRzh> hYPeRair, yes... bUt if it COuLd Be validAtEd, i wouLd Not Say No :)
<dirECtheX> DktrKRanz, it's aN RSS rEAder. the major chANge, other than rEMoVINg THe noN-frEe component, Is drOPpinG gecKO iN faVOur of WebkiT
<dIReCThex> DktrKranz, and no, i DoN't know How feAsible backporTing the repLACEment rss Lib wOUlD Be
<DktrKranz> dirEctheX: mmmh, wasn't THat alreaDy proCessed?
<hyPerair> eMeRZH: ah i see
<DKtrkraNz> I'Ve sEEN sOmething on -chaNGEs, waS iT Debian?
<DirEcthex> DKtrkraNz, wEll, It'S been updaTed for thE mOnO 2.0 tRaNsiTion iN Jaunty, buT nOt "fUlLy"... i Was reSEarchiNg why, And iT sEeMS thE 1.0 dependENcIES comE fRoM the BinArY dll
<

<hyperair> considering th at the cle an ru lefro muplo ader s.mk would hav e  gen erated a partially com plete  d e bian / co ntrol  alread y 
< s a vva s>  a h.. 
< s av vas>now  I see! !
 * hyper air  n ods
<savvas> bu t I thinkit' s better tolea ve itth isw ay, g ive s the  maint a iner m ore power  o v er con t rol.inc h an ges:P
<directhex> hm .  a n yone on motu-r elease  a b ou t ? 
<h ype rair> yesth at'sm y point <h y p e rai r > leave it th at way
<sav v as>  hyper ai r:t hanksfor t he cla rification,  you 've beena bigh elp! :) <hypera ir> np 
<d ire cthe x >Dk trK ra n z,p ok e?< eMe rzh> I'm  l oo kingfora n M OTU' s r evie w ofmy package at  ht tp:/ / rev u.ubu ntuwi re.c om /deta ils.py ?pack ag e=sqliteman...than ks for yo urhe lp:) 
<hyp e rair>eMe rzh : i'd w ait for kar mi c i fi were you ;)
<Dkt rK r a nz > direct hex: p i ke 
< d irecthex >Dkt rKra n z , wha t ar e  t he chanc es ona  F Fe  for "b la m" goi ng  to  be ? I w a s go ing to  avoid a sking for one (as th e  0.0.1 upstre a mb u mp cont ain s a fundame ntal chan ge), bu t s o methi ng'scr o pp e d up..... a binary- on ly dll  in u buntu's origwhich theu b u ntu vers ionn ee d s
<eMerzh> hyp erair , yes... b u t if itcould  be vali dated, iw o uld notsay  no  :) 
<d i r ec thex> DktrKra n z , it 's  an RSS  re ader. t hemaj orcha ng e, otherthan rem ov in gth e n on-fr e e compon en t,is  dr oppin g  gecko  in f avou rof web kit
<di r ec t h ex>Dk tr Kran z,an d no,  i d o n't  know h ow feasib leb ackp or ti ng thereplacement r ss  lib would  b e
< DktrKr a n z> direc thex: mmmh, wasn't that already  pr ocess ed?<hyperair > e Merzh:  ah i see<DktrK ranz>  I 've s een s o m et hin gon -change s ,  wa s itDe bian ?
<dire cthex> DktrKranz,w ell , it's been u pda tedf o rthe mo n o 2 .0 tra n s ition in jaunty , but not"f u ll y"... i wa s  re se arching  why, a nd it seems t he 1.0 de pendencie scome f rom  the binar y dll
<

<hyperair> considering_that the_clean rule from uploaders.mk_would have_generated_a partially_complete_debian/control already
<savvas> ah..
<savvas>_now I see!!
_* hyperair nods
<savvas> but_I think it's_better_to leave it this way, gives the maintainer more power over control.in changes :P
<directhex>_hm._anyone on_motu-release_about?
<hyperair>_yes that's my point
<hyperair> leave_it that way
<savvas> hyperair: thanks_for the_clarification, you've been a big help! :)
<hyperair> np
<directhex>_DktrKranz,_poke?
<eMerzh> I'm looking_for an MOTU's review of my package at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=sqliteman..._thanks for your help :)
<hyperair> eMerzh:_i'd wait for_karmic_if_i were you ;)
<DktrKranz>_directhex: pike
<directhex> DktrKranz, what are the_chances on a FFe for "blam"_going to be? I was going to_avoid asking for one (as the_0.0.1 upstream bump contains a_fundamental change),_but something's cropped up..... a_binary-only dll in_ubuntu's orig_which the ubuntu_version needs
<eMerzh> hyperair, yes... but if_it could be_validated, i would not say no_:)
<directhex>_DktrKranz, it's an_RSS_reader._the major_change, other than_removing_the non-free_component,_is dropping gecko in favour of_webkit
<directhex>_DktrKranz, and no, i don't know how_feasible backporting the replacement_rss_lib would be
<DktrKranz> directhex:_mmmh, wasn't that already processed?
<hyperair>_eMerzh: ah i see
<DktrKranz> I've seen_something on_-changes, was_it Debian?
<directhex> DktrKranz, well, it's been updated for the mono 2.0_transition in jaunty, but not "fully"..._i was researching why,_and it_seems_the 1.0 dependencies_come_from the_binary dll
<