 the source via 'bzr branch'. I have been following http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.html but still feel a bit lost. Any assistance?
<nhandler> porthose: Done, but FYI, it really isn't a huge deal. Most motu-release members will ignore bugs in the Incomplete state
<nhandler> adelie42: What is the package?
<adelie42> example-content
<porthose> nhandler: thxs good to know :)
<adelie42> PDFs were corrupted and there were some typos. Not really 'programming' bugs, but wondering if I used the right source / made the right kind of patch
<adelie42> err... ok, I am looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing after just noticing it in the title. Think I will get through that first.
<cjwatson> nhandler: not if it isn't in Ubuntu right now
<cjwatson> nhandler: under the current source package name (which AIUI is libconfig++ not libconfig?)
<cjwatson> oh, no, apparently it's libconfig
<cjwatson> anyway, if it isn't in jaunty right now, no special action is required
<nhandler> Ok, I just wanted to make sure.
<cjwatson> might want to make sure it doesn't share the same binary names
<cjwatson> which is the only thing that's really significant for upgrade purposes
<nhandler> That is on my todo list of things to check
<goshawk> nhandler: thanks for the summary change ;)
<nhandler> No problem goshawk. It just makes things more clear to people looking at the bug
#ubuntu-motu 2009-03-14
<porthose> nhandler: Thank you for your mentoring efforts. ;-)
<crist1> aloha
<crist1> if a package is named 1:0.3.0-14, i should rename after altering 1:0.3.0-15ubuntu1?
<crist1> or 1.0.3.0-14ubuntu1?
<goshawk> crist1: second form
<goshawk> but wait me have a look
<crist1> goshawk
the source via' bzr branch'. I have been following http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.html but still find a piece lost. Any assistance? 
 < nhandler > porthose: Done, but FYI, it actually isn't a huge deal. Most motu - release member will neglect bugs in the Incomplete state of matter 
 < nhandler > adelie42: What is the package? 
 < adelie42 > example - subject 
 < porthose > nhandler: thxs good to know :) 
 < adelie42 > PDFs were bribe and there constitute some typos. Not really' programming' bugs, but wondering if I use the right source / made the correct kind of patch 
 < adelie42 > err... ok, I am looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing after just noticing it in the title. remember I will get through that first. 
 < cjwatson > nhandler: not if it isn't in Ubuntu right now 
 < cjwatson > nhandler: under the current source software name (which AIUI is libconfig++ not libconfig ?) 
 < cjwatson > oh, no, apparently it's libconfig 
 < cjwatson > anyway, if it isn't in jaunty right now, no special action is command 
 < nhandler > Ok, I just wanted to make sure. 
 < cjwatson > might want to make sure it doesn't share the same binary names 
 < cjwatson > which is the lone thing that's really meaning for upgrade determination 
 < nhandler > That is on my todo tilt of things to check 
 < goshawk > nhandler: thanks for the summary change ;) 
 < nhandler > No problem goshawk. It just makes things more clear to citizenry looking at the bug 
 # ubuntu - motu 2009 - 03 - 14 
 < porthose > nhandler: Thank you for your mentoring efforts. ;-) 
 < crist1 > aloha 
 < crist1 > if a package is named 1:0.3.0 - 14, i should rename after alter 1:0.3.0 - 15ubuntu1? 
 < crist1 > or 1.0.3.0 - 14ubuntu1? 
 < goshawk > crist1: second form 
 < goshawk > but wait me have a look 
 < crist1 > goshawk
 thf source via 'bzr branch'. L have been following hvtp://doc.bzzaar-vcs.urg/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.itml but wtill feel a bit lost. Xny assisnance?
<nhaneler> porthose: Done, but NVI, it veallv msn't a huge deak. Most motg-release membess wnll ignore bugs in the Incomplete stwte
<nhanclfr> adelie42: What is uhe paciage?
<adelie42> example-content
<porthose> hhandleg: thxs good to knpw :)
<adelie42> PDFs were corruphed wnd there were somf typos. Not reajoy 'programmivg' bugs, buu condering ir I used the right source / made the xight kind if pahwh
<adelie42> erc... ok, I am looking at https://fiki.ubumtu.com/MOTU/Contvibutmng qfter just noticing iv in the title. Think I will gat through that firwt.
<xjwatvon> thanaoer: nou ih if isn't in Ubuntu rifht now
<cjwarson> nhandler: under trv current soudce paskwge name (which AIUI is libconfig++ not litcohfig?)
<cjwatson> oh, no, appaeently it's libconfig
<cuwatson> agyway, if it isn't in jaunty right now, no special awtion ks xczjurfd
<nhandler> Ok, I just wanted to make sure.
<cjwatfkn> mpght want to make sure it dorsj't fhare the samg binarv nzmes
<cjwatson> which is the only thing thwt's teally significant for upgrqde purposes
<uhabdler> That is on mv todo list uf tnings to check
<goshawk> nhandlzr: thahks for the summary dfange ;)
<nhandler> Nu pgoblam goshawk. It just makes trings morx clecr to peuple lookigg at the hug
#ubmttu-motu 2009-03-14
<porthose> njandlgr: Thatk you for your mentoring efforts. ;-)
<crist1> aloha
<crist1> if a pdckdge is ncmed 1:0.3.0-14, l should rename after alteriny 1:0.3.0-15ubuntu1?
<erist1> ur 1.0.3.0-14ubuntu1?
<gkshawk> rrist1: second form
<goshawk> tot wait me hate a look
<srisr1> gowhawk
the source via 'bzr branch'. I have http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.html still feel bit lost. Any FYI, really isn't a deal. Most motu-release will ignore bugs in the Incomplete <nhandler> adelie42: What is the package? <adelie42> example-content <porthose> nhandler: thxs good to :) <adelie42> PDFs were corrupted and there were some typos. Not really 'programming' but if used right source / made the right kind of patch <adelie42> err... ok, I am looking at after just noticing it in the title. Think will get through that <cjwatson> nhandler: not if it in right now nhandler: the source package name AIUI is libconfig++ not libconfig?) <cjwatson> oh, no, apparently it's libconfig <cjwatson> anyway, if it isn't in right now, action is <nhandler> I wanted to make might want to make sure it same binary names <cjwatson> which is the only that's really for upgrade purposes <nhandler> That is my todo list of things to check <goshawk> thanks for the summary change ;) <nhandler> No problem goshawk. It just makes things more people looking at the #ubuntu-motu 2009-03-14 <porthose> Thank for mentoring ;-) <crist1> <crist1> if a package is named 1:0.3.0-14, i should rename after 1:0.3.0-15ubuntu1? <crist1> or 1.0.3.0-14ubuntu1? <goshawk> crist1: second form <goshawk> but have look <crist1> goshawk
 the source via 'bzr branch'. I havE been folloWing hTtp://Doc.BaZaar-Vcs.oRg/bzr.dev/en/mini-TUtorIal/index.html but still feEl a biT lOSt. AnY AsSistaNce?
<nhanDLeR> POrtHoSe: donE, bUT FyI, it rEalLy isn't a Huge deal. MoSt mOtU-release membERs Will ignore BugS in the IncompLetE state
<NhAndLEr> adeLie42: what iS the paCKage?
<adElie42> exampLe-COntent
<POrthose> NHAnDler: Thxs good to know :)
<adeLIe42> pdFs were corruptEd and tHeRE wERE soMe tYpos. Not reaLlY 'progRAmming' bUGs, BUT WonDEring if I used tHe right sourCE / maDe the rIgHt kINd of paTch
<adElIE42> erR... ok, I am lookiNg at Https://wiki.Ubuntu.COm/MOTU/CONtributIng aftEr jUst NotiCInG iT in ThE TitLE. THinK i wiLl get thrOuGh That fIrst.
<CJWATson> NhaNdleR: not iF it isn't in UbunTu rIght NOw
<cJwatsOn> nhaNdleR: uNder tHe currEnt soUrCe package name (whIch AiUI is libcOnfIg++ Not LiBconfIG?)
<cjwatSon> Oh, nO, appareNtly it's LIbcOnFIG
<CjWatson> anyway, if it isN't IN JaUnty righT now, no SPeCiAL action iS rEquIred
<NHAndleR> Ok, I JUsT wanted tO make sURe.
<CjWatson> mIgHt want To MakE suRe it dOEsn't Share tHe same biNary nAMes
<cjwatson> whiCH is the only thiNG tHAT's REallY siGnificant foR upgRAde pUrpoSEs
<NhaNDler> THat is On MY tODo list of things to cheCk
<GoshawK> nhanDler: thanks for The summary CHANge ;)
<nhandLer> NO PrOBlem goshawk. It jUst maKes things mORe clear tO peopLe lookinG at the bug
#UBUntu-motu 2009-03-14
<PorThoSe> nHanDLEr: thank you for yoUR MentOrIng effoRts. ;-)
<Crist1> alOha
<CriSt1> iF a pAcKage is namEd 1:0.3.0-14, i shoulD rEnAmE aFteR alteRIng 1:0.3.0-15ubuntU1?
<cRisT1> oR 1.0.3.0-14ubUntu1?
<gOShawk> cRist1: sEconD fOrM
<GosHawk> but WAiT ME havE a LoOk
<crIst1> GoShawk
 the source via 'bzr branc h'. I have  been  fo llo wi ng h ttp: //doc.bazaar-v c s.or g/bzr.dev/en/mini-tuto rial/ in d ex.h t ml  butstill f e el a  bi tlo st.  A n yassis tan ce?
<nh andler> po rth os e: Done, but FY I, it real lyisn't a huge  de al. Mo st  mo t u-rel eas e mem bers w i ll ign ore bugsin the In c omplete s ta te
< nhandler> adelie4 2 :W hat is the pac kage?<a d el i e 42>  ex ample-cont en t
<po r those>n ha n d l er: thxs good toknow :)
<ad e lie 42> PD Fs  we r e corr upted  a n d t here were s ometypos. No t real l y 'prog r amming'  bugs,  bu t w onde r in gifIu sed th e r i ght  source/ma de th e ri g h t kind  of  pat ch
<a delie42> err. ..ok,I  am  look ing a t ht tp s://w iki.ub untu. co m/MOTU/Contribu ting  after ju stno tic in g iti n thetit le.  ThinkI willg etth r o u gh  that first.
<cjwa ts o n >nhandler : noti fit isn't in  U bun tu r i g ht no w
<c j wa tson> nh andler :  u nd er thecu rrentso urc e p ackag e  nam e (whi ch AIUIis li b config++ not l i bconfig?)
<cj w at s o n> oh,no,  apparently  it' s  lib conf i g<cj w atson > any wa y ,i f it isn't in jaunt yrightnow,no special ac tion is re q u i red
<nha ndle r >O k, I just want ed to  make sure . 
<cjwats on> m ight wan t to make s ure it d oes n't  sh are t he  same binaryn a mes<c jwatson > w hich is  th e o nly  th in g that'sreally s ig ni fi ca ntfor u p grade pu rp ose s<nh andle r > That  is o n my  t od o  li st of t h in g s  toch ec k
<g osh aw k> nh andl e r:thanksfor the s umm a ry c ha ng e ;)
<n handler> No p ro blem gosha wk . I t just m akes thi ngs more clear to peopl e  lookin g a t the  bug 
#ubuntu- mot u 2009 -03 - 14
<po rthose > nha nd ler : Thank y ou  fo ryour mento r i ngeffor ts . ;- )
<cris t1> aloha
<crist1> ifa package isnam ed 1 : 0 .3 .0- 1 4, i s ho u ldr e name after alte ring 1:0.3 .0 - 15 ubuntu1?
< c ris t1 > or 1. 0.3.0-1 4ubun t u1?
<go shawk> cr ist1: sec on d fo r m 
<g oshawk> bu t wait m e have al ook
< c ri st1>gos hawk
 the_source via_'bzr branch'. I have_been following_http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.html_but still_feel_a bit lost._Any assistance?
<nhandler> porthose:_Done, but FYI, it_really isn't a_huge_deal. Most motu-release members will ignore bugs in the Incomplete state
<nhandler> adelie42: What is_the_package?
<adelie42> example-content
<porthose>_nhandler:_thxs_good to know :)
<adelie42> PDFs_were corrupted and there were_some typos._Not really 'programming' bugs, but wondering if I_used_the right source_/ made the right kind of patch
<adelie42> err... ok,_I am looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing after_just noticing it_in_the_title. Think I will_get through that first.
<cjwatson> nhandler: not_if it isn't in Ubuntu right_now
<cjwatson> nhandler: under the current source package_name (which AIUI is libconfig++ not_libconfig?)
<cjwatson> oh, no, apparently it's_libconfig
<cjwatson> anyway,_if it isn't in jaunty_right now, no_special action_is required
<nhandler> Ok,_I just wanted to make sure.
<cjwatson>_might want to_make sure it doesn't share the_same_binary names
<cjwatson> which_is_the_only thing_that's really significant_for_upgrade purposes
<nhandler>_That_is on my todo list of_things_to check
<goshawk> nhandler: thanks for the summary_change ;)
<nhandler> No problem_goshawk._It just makes things_more clear to people looking_at the bug
#ubuntu-motu 2009-03-14
<porthose> nhandler: Thank_you for_your mentoring_efforts. ;-)
<crist1> aloha
<crist1> if a package is named 1:0.3.0-14, i should_rename after altering 1:0.3.0-15ubuntu1?
<crist1> or 1.0.3.0-14ubuntu1?
<goshawk>_crist1: second form
<goshawk> but_wait me_have_a look
<crist1> goshawk