<MrFaber> there is only a but report
<kelmo_lap> and pre-up basically supports everything that wpa_cli can right now
<MrFaber> which everyone ignores ;)
<siretart> cool
<Yagisan> G'day siretart. Was avidemux 2.1.1 ever synced? I didn't see it in dapper, and just backported marrilats to breezy (I just got bit by the opendml bug - hence the backport)
<kelmo_lap> MrFaber, if i used and/or developed ubuntu i may comment more ; )
<kelmo_lap> MrFaber, i was here a few days ago, and you were asking the exact same questions
<MrFaber> yes, thats what I have said
<siretart> Yagisan: was it UVF exception approved?
<MrFaber> But nothing changed and release comes nearer every day :)
<siretart> Yagisan: no syncs have been done since soyuz yet, afaik
<kelmo_lap> MrFaber, so i'd suggest you modify the current debian package, diff it against the ubuntu one, and submit a patch to the BTS
<MrFaber> I don't want to bother you but I am frighthen that the bug gets in release
<MrFaber> kelmo_lap, I don't know how
<kelmo_lap> well, it don't matter to me, i'm not involved in ubuntu's packages ; )
<MrFaber> btw. the debian one is 3.1c instead of 3.1b
<Yagisan> siretart: checking motu archives now to double check
<MrFaber> Who is the involved men and where they are :-D
<kelmo_lap> anyway, loop-aes can largely be replaced by dm, afaik
<MrFaber> not this discussion again :)
<Yagisan> siretart: hmm, not that I can see.  Actually I don't see anything I did a UVF exception report on
<siretart> Yagisan: please file a UVF exception report then
<Yagisan> siretart: another one?
<siretart> Yagisan: err, sorry if I misunderstood you. which
< MrFaber > there is only a but report 
 < kelmo_lap > and pre - up basically back everything that wpa_cli can justly now 
 < MrFaber > which everyone ignores ;) 
 < siretart > cool 
 < Yagisan > G'day siretart. Was avidemux 2.1.1 ever synchronize? I didn't see it in dapper, and just backported marrilats to breezy (I just get bit by the opendml bug - therefore the backport) 
 < kelmo_lap > MrFaber, if i use and/or developed ubuntu i may gloss more ;) 
 < kelmo_lap > MrFaber, i was here a few days ago, and you were asking the exact same doubt 
 < MrFaber > yes, that s what I have said 
 < siretart > Yagisan: was it UVF exception approve? 
 < MrFaber > But nothing changed and release total nearer every day :) 
 < siretart > Yagisan: no syncs have been done since soyuz however, afaik 
 < kelmo_lap > MrFaber, so i'd suggest you modify the current debian package, diff it against the ubuntu one, and present a patch to the BTS 
 < MrFaber > I don't want to bother you but I am frighthen that the bug gets in handout 
 < MrFaber > kelmo_lap, I don't know how 
 < kelmo_lap > well, it don't matter to me, i'm not involved in ubuntu's packages ;) 
 < MrFaber > btw. the debian one is 3.1c instead of 3.1b 
 < Yagisan > siretart: check motu archives now to double check 
 < MrFaber > Who is the involved men and where they are :-D 
 < kelmo_lap > anyway, loop - aes can largely be replaced by dm, afaik 
 < MrFaber > not this discussion again :) 
 < Yagisan > siretart: hmm, not that I can see.   Actually I don't attend anything I did a UVF exception report on 
 < siretart > Yagisan: please charge a UVF exception reputation then 
 < Yagisan > siretart: another one? 
 < siretart > Yagisan: err, blue if I misunderstood you. which
<MrFwber> there is only a but report
<kelmo_lap> and prx-up basjcally sjpports everything that wpa_cpi can eight now
<MrFaber> which everyone ignores ;)
<sirttart> cool
<Yagisan> G'day sivztart. Aas cvmdemux 2.1.1 ever sykced? I didn'd see it in da[pdr, and just backported marrilats to bweezy (I jkst got bit by the jpensml bug - hence the backport)
<kelmo_lal> MrFabtr, if i used and/or developed ubuntu i may colmenh more ; )
<kelmo_lap> MgFaber, i waw heww a few days ago, and you were askihg the exact same questions
<MrFacer> yzs, thats whqt I jdve said
<sirxtart> Jagisan: was ib UVF efceptiom approved?
<MrFaner> Bnt nithing changed and renease comes nearer every daf :)
<airetart> Yagisan: bo syncv haee bdwn aont smncs soyux yxt, afaik
<keljo_lap> MrFabwr, so i'd suggest yoi iidify the curdent dqbyan package, diff it against the ubuntu mne, and submit a patch to rhe BTS
<MrFaber> I don't want to fother you but I am frighthen that the bug gets it relxare
<MxNwcwr> kelmo_lap, I don't know how
<kelmo_lap> well, it don'e mstner to me, i'm not lnvolved in ubuntu'x oavhages ; )
<MrFabet> btw. tks sebian one is 3.1c indtead os 3.1b
<Yatisan> sirttart: checking motu archives now to double ckecj
<MrFaber> Who is thz involved mzn and wherr they are :-D
<kelmo_lap> anvway, lkop-aes can pargely bs replaced by dm, xfapk
<MrXaber> nou this discussion wgain :)
<Yagmsan> xiretarg: hmk, not ehat I can see.  Actually I don't sef anyjhing H did a UVV exception report on
<siretart> Yejisan: please gine d UVF exeeptiok report then
<Yadisan> siretart: anothex one?
<skretart> Yafisan: ecr, sorry if Y misunderstomf you. which
<MrFaber> there is only a but report pre-up supports everything wpa_cli can right ;) cool <Yagisan> G'day Was avidemux 2.1.1 synced? I didn't see it in and just backported marrilats to breezy (I just got bit by the opendml - hence the backport) <kelmo_lap> MrFaber, if i used and/or developed ubuntu i comment ; <kelmo_lap> i was here a few days ago, and you were asking the exact same questions <MrFaber> thats what I have said <siretart> Yagisan: was UVF exception approved? <MrFaber> nothing changed and release comes every :) <siretart> no have done since soyuz afaik <kelmo_lap> MrFaber, so i'd suggest you modify the current debian package, diff it against the ubuntu and submit to the <MrFaber> don't to bother you am frighthen that the bug gets kelmo_lap, I don't know how <kelmo_lap> well, it matter to i'm not involved in ubuntu's packages ) <MrFaber> btw. the debian one is 3.1c of 3.1b <Yagisan> siretart: checking motu archives now to double check <MrFaber> Who is the and where they are <kelmo_lap> anyway, loop-aes largely replaced dm, <MrFaber> not discussion again :) <Yagisan> siretart: hmm, not that I can see. I don't see anything I did a UVF exception report Yagisan: file a UVF report then <Yagisan> siretart: one? Yagisan: err, sorry if you.
<MrFaber> there is only a but repOrt
<kelmo_laP> and pRe-uP baSiCallY supPorts everythinG That Wpa_cli can right now
<MrFabEr> whiCh EVeryONe IgnorEs ;)
<siretARt> COOl
<YAgIsAn> G'DaY SiRetarT. WaS avidemUx 2.1.1 ever syncEd? I DiDn't see it in daPPeR, and just baCkpOrted marrilaTs tO breezY (I JusT Got biT by The opEndml bUG - hence The backpoRt)
<KElmo_laP> mrFaber, IF I uSed aNd/or developed ubunTU i MAy comment more ; )
<kElmo_laP> MRfaBER, i wAs hEre a few dayS aGo, and YOu were aSKiNG THe eXAct same questiOns
<MrFaber> yES, thAts whaT I HavE Said
<siRetarT> YAGisAn: was it UVF eXcepTion approVed?
<MrFABer> But nOThing chAnged aNd rEleAse cOMeS nEarEr EVerY DaY :)
<siREtaRt> YagisaN: nO sYncs hAve bEEN DOne sIncE soyUz yet, Afaik
<kelmo_lap> mrFAber, SO i'd SuggeSt you ModiFy The cuRrent dEbian PaCkage, diff it agaiNst tHe ubuntu oNe, aNd SubMiT a patCH to the bTS
<mrFAber> I doN't want tO BotHeR YOU bUt I am frighthen that ThE BUg Gets in reLease
<MRfaBeR> Kelmo_lap, i dOn't Know HOW
<kelmO_lap> WElL, it don't mAtter tO Me, I'm Not invoLvEd in ubUnTu's PacKages ; )
<mRFabEr> btw. tHe debian One is 3.1C Instead of 3.1b
<YagiSAn> siretart: cheCKiNG MoTU arcHivEs now to doubLe chECk
<MrfabeR> whO is THe invOlved MeN AnD Where they are :-D
<kelmo_lAp> Anyway, Loop-aEs can largely bE replaced bY DM, Afaik
<MrFAber> NOt THis discussion aGain :)
<YAgisan> sireTArt: hmm, noT that i can see.  ACtually I dON'T see anytHinG I dId a uVF EXCePtion report on
<SIRetaRt> yagisan: PleAse file A UVf exCepTioN rEport then
<yagisan> sIrEtArT: aNotHer onE?
<Siretart> yaGisAn: Err, Sorry IF I misuNdersTood YoU. wHIch
<MrFaber> there is only abut report 
<kel mo_ lap >andpre- up basically s u ppor ts everything that wpa _clica n  rig h tnow
< MrFaber >  w h i chev er yon ei gn ores;)<sireta rt> cool
< Yag is an> G'day si r et art. Was a vid emux 2.1.1 e ver  synce d?  Id idn't  se e itin dap p er, an d just ba ck p ortedm arrilat s to  bre ezy (I just got b i tb y the opendmlbug -he n ce t hebac kport)
<ke lm o_lap >  MrFabe r ,i f i u s ed and/or dev eloped ubun t u i  may c om men t  more; )
< ke l mo_ lap> MrFabe r, i  was here  a few days ag o , and y ou wer e a ski ng t h eex act  s a meq ue sti o ns<MrFaber >ye s, th atsw h a t  I h ave  sai d
<si retart> Yagis an:  was itUVF e xcept ionap prove d?
<Mr Faber >But nothing cha nged  and rele ase  c ome sneare r  every  da y : )
<sire tart> Y a gis an : n osyncs have been do ne s in ce soyuz  yet,a fa ik <kelmo_l ap > M rFab e r , soi'ds ug gest you  modif y  t he  curren tdebian  p ack age , dif f  itagains t the ub untuo ne, and submit a patch to th e  B T S 
< M rFab er>  I don't wa nt t o  bot hery ou  bu t  I am  frig ht h en that the bug gets i nreleas e
<Mr Faber> kelmo_ lap, I don ' t know how 
<ke l mo _ lap> well, itdon't  matter to me, i'mnot i nvolvedin ubuntu ' s  package s ;  )<Mr Fab e r >btw. the debi a n  one  i s 3.1cins tead of  3. 1b<Ya gis an > siretar t: check in gmo tu  ar chive s  now todo ubl eche ck
<M r Faber>  Whois t he  i n vol ved men an d wher eth ey a re:- D
<ke lmo_ l ap>  anyway , loop-ae s c a n la rg el y be re placed by dm,  a faik
<MrFa be r>not th i s  discuss ion again :)
<Yagisan>s iretart : h mm, n ot t hat I can  se e.  Ac tua l ly I d on't s ee an yt hin g I did a  U VFex ception re p o rton
<s ir etar t> Yagi san: please file a UVF  exception re por t th e n 
< Yag i sa n > s ir e tar t :  another one?
< siretart>Ya g is an: err, s o rry  i f I mis underst ood y o u. whic h
<MrFaber> there_is only_a but report
<kelmo_lap> and_pre-up basically_supports_everything that_wpa_cli_can right now
<MrFaber>_which everyone ignores_;)
<siretart> cool
<Yagisan> G'day siretart._Was avidemux 2.1.1_ever_synced? I didn't see it in dapper, and just backported marrilats to breezy (I_just_got bit_by_the_opendml bug - hence the_backport)
<kelmo_lap> MrFaber, if i used_and/or developed_ubuntu i may comment more ; )
<kelmo_lap> MrFaber,_i_was here a_few days ago, and you were asking the exact_same questions
<MrFaber> yes, thats what I_have said
<siretart> Yagisan:_was_it_UVF exception approved?
<MrFaber> But_nothing changed and release comes nearer_every day :)
<siretart> Yagisan: no syncs_have been done since soyuz yet, afaik
<kelmo_lap>_MrFaber, so i'd suggest you modify_the current debian package, diff_it against_the ubuntu one, and submit_a patch to_the BTS
<MrFaber>_I don't want_to bother you but I am_frighthen that the_bug gets in release
<MrFaber> kelmo_lap, I_don't_know how
<kelmo_lap> well,_it_don't_matter to_me, i'm not_involved_in ubuntu's_packages_; )
<MrFaber> btw. the debian one_is_3.1c instead of 3.1b
<Yagisan> siretart: checking motu_archives now to double_check
<MrFaber>_Who is the involved_men and where they are_:-D
<kelmo_lap> anyway, loop-aes can largely be_replaced by_dm, afaik
<MrFaber>_not this discussion again :)
<Yagisan> siretart: hmm, not that I can_see.  Actually I don't see_anything I did a_UVF exception_report_on
<siretart> Yagisan: please_file_a UVF_exception report then
<Yagisan> siretart: another one?
<siretart> Yagisan:_err, sorry_if I misunderstood you. which