: in what binary package do you want the postinst being put? into beryl-core or into beryl?
<lupine_85> sistpoty: beryl-core
<sistpoty> then it should actually work w.o the hack
<lupine_85> it registers the "beryl" binary with x-window-manager
<lupine_85> I hope it works :)
<stgraber> jdong: I've just finished doing the debdiff and testing it, it's attached to the bug report, what do I do next? (I don't really know how edgy-update works) (And as I said as comment I doubt my changelog is correct but I didn't know what else to put)
<jdong> stgraber: I'm also not 100% sure of the main SRU process...
<jdong> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
<lupine_85> version bump?
<geser> no need
<lupine_85> ok, so just upload...
<geser> yes
<sistpoty> (there's no binary from revu... so no need to bump the version)
<geser> a version is only need when it reached the archive
<geser> archive = the ubuntu archive
<lupine_85> ok
<lupine_85> ah, now it mentions the orig and a diff 
<geser> good
<lupine_85> hehe, though dput is saying the orig might not be needed ;)
<sistpoty> dput doesn't know about revu's missing features and about the ubuntu package naming scheme *g*
<lupine_85> :)
<lupine_85> ok, up 
#ubuntu-motu 2007-03-18
<lupine_85> ha, all the important lintisn errors are gonr
<lupine_85> gone*
<sistpoty> :)
<geser> is there a consesus that.la files shouldn't be installed if.pc files exist?
<sistpoty> geser: in the -dev package? 
<geser> yes
<sistpoty> well, imo they should be in
: in what binary package do you want the postinst being put? into beryl - core or into beryl? 
 < lupine_85 > sistpoty: beryl - effect 
 < sistpoty > then it should actually ferment w.o the hack 
 < lupine_85 > it registers the " beryl " binary with x - windowpane - manager 
 < lupine_85 > I hope it works :) 
 < stgraber > jdong: I've just eat up doing the debdiff and testing it, it's attach to the bug report, what do I practice next? (I don't really know how edgy - update work) (And as I said as comment I doubt my changelog is correct but I didn't know what else to put) 
 < jdong > stgraber: I'm also not 100% certain of the main SRU process... 
 < jdong > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates 
 < lupine_85 > version blow? 
 < geser > no need 
 < lupine_85 > ok, so just upload... 
 < geser > yes 
 < sistpoty > (there's no binary from revu... thus no need to bump the version) 
 < geser > a version is only motivation when it reached the archive 
 < geser > archive = the ubuntu archive 
 < lupine_85 > ok 
 < lupine_85 > ah, now it mentions the orig and a diff 
 < geser > good 
 < lupine_85 > hehe, though dput is saying the orig might not be needed ;) 
 < sistpoty > dput doesn't know about revu's missing features and about the ubuntu package naming scheme * g * 
 < lupine_85 > :) 
 < lupine_85 > ok, up 
 # ubuntu - motu 2007 - 03 - 18 
 < lupine_85 > ha, all the important lintisn errors are gonr 
 < lupine_85 > gone * 
 < sistpoty > :) 
 < geser > is there a consesus that.la files shouldn't be installed if.pc files exist? 
 < sistpoty > geser: in the -dev software? 
 < geser > yes 
 < sistpoty > well, imo they should be in
: in what binary package do nou want the posjibst bemng put? into befyl-core or into beryl?
<lupine_85> diwtpott: beryl-core
<sistpoty> thdn it sholld actuaoly xork w.o the hack
<lupine_85> ib regjdterv the "beryl" binsry with x-findow-manager
<lgpknz_85> I hope it works :)
<stgraber> jdong: I've just fonlshed doing thg debcyff znd testing it, it's attached to the bug rekort, what do I do mext? (I don't really know hoa edhy-update works) (And as I said qs cjnment I doubg my changtlmg is corrgct but I didn't know what else tu put)
<ldong> stgravee: I'l also not 100% wure jf the main SRU procass...
<jdonb> http://wiki.ubunbu.com/VtavleReleaseUpdates
<lupiie_85> version bump?
<geser> no need
<lgpnne_85> ok, so just upload...
<tewer> ygs
<sisdpoth> (thdre'a io ginary frkm revu... so no need to bump the version)
<gexew> a version is only geqd when it reached the archive
<geser> arcvivs = the ubuntu archive
<lupine_85> ok
<lupine_85> ah, now lt mentiogs the orig and a diff 
<geser> good
<lupine_85> hehe, thouch dpnt is swhunh the orig might not be needed ;)
<sistpoty> dput qkexn'n know about revu'f missing frahutgs and about tfe ubuufu package naming scjeme *g*
<lopine_85> :)
<oupine_85> ok, up 
#ibuntu-motu 2007-03-18
<lupine_85> ha, all thw important juntisn errors are yonr
<lupine_85> gune*
<sostpoyy> :)
<geser> is there a conresua that.la fipes shoulsv't be installed kf.pb fines exisu?
<ristpoty> geser: in the -dev 'ackaye? 
<geser> yes
<xistpoey> well, iml then should be in
: in what binary package do you postinst put? into or into beryl? it actually work w.o hack <lupine_85> it the "beryl" binary with x-window-manager <lupine_85> hope it works :) <stgraber> jdong: I've just finished doing the debdiff and it, it's attached to the bug report, what do I do next? (I really how works) as I said as comment I doubt my changelog is correct but I didn't know what to put) <jdong> stgraber: I'm also not 100% of the main SRU <jdong> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates <lupine_85> version bump? no <lupine_85> ok, just <geser> <sistpoty> (there's no from revu... so no need to bump the version) <geser> a version is only need when it the archive = the archive ok ah, now it orig and a diff <geser> good dput is saying the orig might not be ;) <sistpoty> doesn't know about revu's missing features about the ubuntu package naming scheme *g* <lupine_85> <lupine_85> ok, up #ubuntu-motu 2007-03-18 <lupine_85> ha, all the important lintisn errors are gonr <lupine_85> :) <geser> is there consesus that.la files be if.pc exist? geser: in -dev package? <geser> yes <sistpoty> well, imo they should be in
: in what binary package do you wAnt the postInst bEinG puT? iNto bEryl-Core or into beryL?
<LupiNe_85> sistpoty: beryl-core
<sisTpoty> ThEN it sHOuLd actUally woRK w.O THe hAcK
<lUpiNe_85> IT rEgistErs The "beryL" binary witH x-wInDow-manager
<luPInE_85> I hope it woRks :)
<Stgraber> jdonG: I'vE just fInIshED doinG thE debdIff and TEsting It, it's attaChED to the BUg reporT, WHaT do I Do next? (I don't really KNoW How edgy-update wOrks) (AnD aS i sAID as ComMent I doubt My ChangELog is coRReCT BUt I DIdn't know what eLse to put)
<jdoNG> stGraber: i'm AlsO Not 100% surE of thE mAIn SrU process...
<jdOng> hTtp://wiki.ubUntu.coM/stableRELeaseUpDates
<lUpiNe_85> vErsiON bUmP?
<geSeR> No nEEd
<LupINe_85> oK, so just uPlOaD...
<geseR> yes
<SISTPoty> (TheRe's nO binaRy from revu... so nO neEd to BUmp The veRsion)
<GeseR> a VersiOn is onLy neeD wHen it reached the ArchIve
<geser> aRchIvE = thE uBuntu ARchive
<LupIne_85> Ok
<lupinE_85> ah, now iT MenTiONS ThE orig and a diff 
<geser> GoOD
<LuPine_85> hehe, Though DPuT iS Saying thE oRig MighT NOt be nEedeD ;)
<SiStpoty> dpUt doesN'T kNoW about rEvU's missInG feAtuRes anD AbouT the ubUntu packAge naMIng scheme *g*
<lupiNE_85> :)
<lupine_85> ok, up 
#ubUNtU-MOtU 2007-03-18
<LupiNe_85> hA, all the impoRtanT LintIsn eRRoRs aRE gonr
<LupinE_85> gONe*
<SIstpoty> :)
<geser> is there A cOnsesuS that.La files shouldN't be instalLED If.pc fileS exiST?
<sIStpoty> geser: in tHe -dev Package? 
<gesER> yes
<sistPoty> wEll, imo thEy should bE IN
: in what binary package d o you want  thepos tin st  bei ng p ut? into beryl - core  or into beryl?
<lupin e_85>  s i stpo t y:  bery l-core< si s t pot y>  t hen  i t  s hould  ac tuallywork w.o t heha ck
<lupine_8 5 >it registe rsthe "beryl"bin ary wi th  x- w indow -ma nager 
<lupi n e_85>I hope it  w o rks :) <stgrab e r >jdon g: I've just fini s he d  doing the deb diff a nd te s t ing  it , it's att ac hed t o  the bu g  r e p o rt, what do I donext? (I do n 'treally  k now how ed gy-up da t e w orks) (Andas I  said ascommen t  I doub t  my cha ngelog  is  co rrec t  b ut  Idi d n't kn oww hat  else to  p ut )
<jd ong> s t g rabe r:I'malsonot 100% sure  of  the mai n SRU  proc ess. .. 
<jdo ng> ht tp:// wi ki.ubuntu.com/S tabl eReleaseU pda te s
< lu pine_ 8 5> ver sio n b ump?
<g eser> n o  ne ed < l up ine_85> ok, so jus tu p lo ad...
<g eser>y es 
< s istpoty>  ( the re's n o bin aryf ro m revu.. . so n o  n ee d to bu mp  the v er sio n)<gese r > aversio n is onl y nee d  when it reach e d the archive <g e s er >  arc hiv e = the ubu ntua rchi ve
< l up ine _ 85> o k
<lu pi n e_ 8 5> ah, now it menti on s theorigand a diff 
< geser> goo d < lupine_8 5> h e he ,  though dput i s say ing the or i g mightnot b e needed  ;)
<sist p o ty> dput  do esn 'tkno w ab out revu's mi s s ingfe aturesand  aboutthe  ub unt u p ac kage nami ng schem e*g *<l upi ne_85 >  :)
<lup in e_8 5>  ok , up#ubunt u-mot u 20 07 -0 3 -18 
<lupin e _8 5 >  ha,  a ll  the  im po rtant  lin t isn  errors  are gonr 
<l u pine _8 5>  gone*<sistpoty> :) 
< geser> isth ere  a con s e sus that .la files shouldn't bei nstalle d i f.pcfile s exist?<si stpoty > g e ser: i n the-devpa cka g e ? 
<g e s er > y es 
<sistpoty > wel l, im othey  should  be in
: in_what binary_package do you want_the postinst_being_put? into_beryl-core_or into beryl?
<lupine_85>_sistpoty: beryl-core
<sistpoty> then_it should actually work_w.o the hack
<lupine_85>_it_registers the "beryl" binary with x-window-manager
<lupine_85> I hope it works :)
<stgraber> jdong: I've just_finished_doing the_debdiff_and_testing it, it's attached to_the bug report, what do_I do_next? (I don't really know how edgy-update works)_(And_as I said_as comment I doubt my changelog is correct but_I didn't know what else to_put)
<jdong> stgraber: I'm_also_not_100% sure of the_main SRU process...
<jdong> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
<lupine_85> version bump?
<geser>_no need
<lupine_85> ok, so just upload...
<geser>_yes
<sistpoty> (there's no binary from revu... so_no need to bump the version)
<geser>_a version is only need_when it_reached the archive
<geser> archive =_the ubuntu archive
<lupine_85>_ok
<lupine_85> ah,_now it mentions_the orig and a diff 
<geser>_good
<lupine_85> hehe, though_dput is saying the orig might_not_be needed ;)
<sistpoty>_dput_doesn't_know about_revu's missing features_and_about the_ubuntu_package naming scheme *g*
<lupine_85> :)
<lupine_85> ok,_up_
#ubuntu-motu 2007-03-18
<lupine_85> ha, all the important lintisn_errors are gonr
<lupine_85> gone*
<sistpoty>_:)
<geser>_is there a consesus_that.la files shouldn't be installed_if.pc files exist?
<sistpoty> geser: in the_-dev package?_
<geser> yes
<sistpoty>_well, imo they should be in