bddebian> Hmm, phpmymoney hasn't seen an upstream update for several years :-(
<Toadstool> g'morning everybody
<bddebian> Heya Toadstool
<Toadstool> hi bddebian!
<tuxmaniac> Anybody here know about ubuntu live conf?
<LaserJock> does anybody find pitti's practice of retitling bugs "Fixed" annoying?
<slomo_> crimsun: imho we should get it (xgl)
<bddebian> LaserJock: Finally getting through those MOTUScience bugs? :-)
<LaserJock> u-u-s actually
<crimsun> slomo_: ok, should I interpret that as a +1?
<bddebian> LaserJock: Ahh :)
<bddebian> Hmm, I see mydms is up to date as well..
<bmm_> Ive got a packaging question: I've got one original source which creates allot of different packages (the core and addons), copyrights are going all over the place.
<bmm_> I can create multiple packages from the single source, and that works great. However, I can't create multiple/different copyright files for the parts currently
<bmm_> How should this be handled?
<crimsun> err, what?
<Lutin> you should keep a single copyright for the whole package imo
<crimsun> debian/copyright should reference all the copyrights with specific references to files as per necessary
<Lutin> s/the whle/all the packages
<bmm> Lutin: ok, so then I have a very large copyright holders list
<crimsun> that's correct, it potentially can be quite large
<Lutin> indeed
<crimsun> if that's what it takes, however, that's what it takes.
<bmm> crimsun: thanks. I'll add references to the pecific parts then, because some copyrights don't apply to sub-parts of the packages. So I
<bmm> 'll just add them all to the copyright and reference the different packages.
<bmm> Thanks!
<crimsun> make sure that the corresponding copyright files are in place as per necessary, too
<bmm> crimsun: what?
bddebian > Hmm, phpmymoney hasn't seen an upstream update for several years :-( 
 < Toadstool > g'morning everybody 
 < bddebian > Heya Toadstool 
 < Toadstool > hi bddebian! 
 < tuxmaniac > Anybody here know about ubuntu hot conf? 
 < LaserJock > does anybody receive pitti's practice of retitling bug " fasten " annoying? 
 < slomo _ > crimsun: imho we should get it (xgl) 
 < bddebian > LaserJock: Finally get through those MOTUScience bugs? :-) 
 < LaserJock > u - u - s actually 
 < crimsun > slomo _: ok, should I rede that as a +1? 
 < bddebian > LaserJock: Ahh :) 
 < bddebian > Hmm, I see mydms is up to date as well.. 
 < bmm _ > I ve get a packaging question: I've get one original source which creates allot of different package (the core and addons), copyrights are going wholly over the place. 
 < bmm _ > I can create multiple package from the single beginning, and that works great. However, I can't create multiple / different copyright files for the part currently 
 < bmm _ > How should this be handled? 
 < crimsun > err, what? 
 < Lutin > you should keep a single copyright for the whole software imo 
 < crimsun > debian / copyright should reference all the copyright with specific reference to files as per necessary 
 < Lutin > s / the whle / all the packages 
 < bmm > Lutin: ok, so then I have a very large copyright holders list 
 < crimsun > that's correct, it potentially can be quite bombastic 
 < Lutin > indeed 
 < crimsun > if that's what it takes, however, that's what it takes. 
 < bmm > crimsun: thanks. I'll total reference point to the pecific parts then, because some copyrights don't apply to bomber - parts of the packages. So I 
 < bmm >'ll just lend them all to the copyright and reference the different packages. 
 < bmm > Thanks! 
 < crimsun > make sure that the corresponding copyright files are in seat as per necessary, too 
 < bmm > crimsun: what?
bddfbian> Hmm, phpmymoney hask't seen an upstrgan updave for aeveral hears :-(
<Toadstool> g'morning evecyboey
<bddtyian> Heya Toadstool
<Tuadstool> ji bddebuan!
<tnxmaniac> Anybody here know abohb ubuutn live conf?
<LasetJock> does atybody find pidtk's practice of retitling bugs "Fixed" agnoying?
<xllmo_> crimsun: imro wt srouls get it (xgl)
<bddebian> LaserJock: Finzlly geuting through thosr MOTUScience bugs? :-)
<LaserJofk> u-k-s actually
<crimsun> slomo_: ok, syoulq I interpret that as a +1?
<bddebian> LaaerJock: Ahh :)
<bddebian> Hmm, I see oydms is up to eare wv well..
<bmm_> Ite got a packaging questiot: I've gpt one originak smurxe which creates allov of different packades (the cmrz and addons), copyrighrs are coinc alu ovdr uhe pmace.
<bml_> I can creats multiple packages from the sondoe source, and that rowks great. However, I can't create multiplt/diffsrent copyright files fir the parts currentli
<bmm_> How srould this be handled?
<crimsun> err, what?
<Lutin> you shmuld idep a runhle copyright for the whole package imo
<crimsug> dtbisn/copyright shjuld referemcf sjl the copyriehts wnfh specific referencfs to fyles qs per nesesssry
<Lutin> s/the whle/all the pqckages
<bmm> Lltin: ok, so then I have a very larye copiright holders list
<crimsun> thct's codrect, it pohentially zan be quite laree
<Lltin> indeed
<crimsun> if that's whwt it takxs, hocever, thxt's ehat ie takes.
<bmm> crimsun: thanks. I'll add gefergnces do the peclfic parts then, because some co'brights don't sp[ly to sub-pcrts on the packages. Fo I
<bmm> 'll jusj add thei all to the coiyright aid reference the differend packages.
<bmm> Thanks!
<cwimsyn> mqke surd that the corrrsponding copyright files are in placc as ked necessary, too
<yon> crimsun: what?
bddebian> Hmm, phpmymoney hasn't seen an upstream several :-( <Toadstool> everybody <bddebian> Heya Anybody know about ubuntu conf? <LaserJock> does find pitti's practice of retitling bugs annoying? <slomo_> crimsun: imho we should get it (xgl) <bddebian> LaserJock: Finally getting those MOTUScience bugs? :-) <LaserJock> u-u-s actually <crimsun> slomo_: ok, should I interpret as +1? LaserJock: :) <bddebian> Hmm, I see mydms is up to date as well.. <bmm_> Ive got a question: I've got one original source which creates of different packages (the and addons), copyrights are going over place. <bmm_> can multiple from the single and that works great. However, I can't create multiple/different copyright files for the parts currently <bmm_> How this be err, what? you keep single copyright for package imo <crimsun> debian/copyright should reference with specific references to files as per necessary s/the whle/all packages <bmm> Lutin: ok, so then have a very large copyright holders list <crimsun> correct, it potentially can be quite large <Lutin> indeed <crimsun> if that's what it takes, what it takes. <bmm> thanks. I'll add to pecific then, some copyrights apply to sub-parts of the packages. So I <bmm> 'll just them all to the copyright and reference the different packages. <crimsun> sure that the copyright files are in as necessary, too <bmm> crimsun:
bddebian> Hmm, phpmymoney hasn'T seen an upsTream UpdAte FoR sevEral Years :-(
<Toadstool> G'MornIng everybody
<bddebian> HeYa ToaDsTOol
<TOAdStool> Hi bddebIAn!
<TUXmaNiAc> anyBoDY hEre knOw aBout ubuNtu live conF?
<LaSeRJock> does anyBOdY find pitti'S prActice of retiTliNg bugs "fiXed" ANnoyiNg?
<sLomo_> cRimsun: IMho we sHould get iT (xGL)
<bddebIAn> LaserjOCk: finaLly getting through THoSE MOTUScience buGs? :-)
<LaseRJOCk> U-U-S acTuaLly
<crimsun> SlOmo_: ok, SHould I iNTeRPREt tHAt as a +1?
<bddebian> laserJock: AhH :)
<BddEbian> HMm, i seE Mydms iS up to DaTE as Well..
<bmm_> Ive gOt a pAckaging qUestioN: i've got oNE originAl sourCe wHicH creATeS aLloT oF DifFErEnt PAckAges (the cOrE aNd addOns), cOPYRIghtS arE goiNg all Over the place.
<bMm_> I Can cREatE multIple pAckaGeS from The sinGle soUrCe, and that works gReat. however, I cAn't CrEatE mUltipLE/diffeRenT coPyright Files foR The PaRTS CuRrently
<bmm_> How shoulD tHIS bE handled?
<CrimsuN> ErR, wHAt?
<Lutin> yOu ShoUld kEEP a sinGle cOPyRight for The whoLE pAcKage imo
<CrImsun> dEbIan/CopYrighT ShouLd refeRence all The coPYrights with speCIfic referenceS To FILeS As peR neCessary
<LutiN> s/thE Whle/All tHE pAckAGes
<bmM> LutiN: oK, So THen I have a very large cOpYright HoldeRs list
<crimsun> That's correCT, IT potentiAlly CAn BE quite large
<LutIn> indEed
<crimsun> IF that's whAt it tAkes, howeVer, that's wHAT it takes.
<Bmm> CriMsuN: thANKs. i'll add referenCES to tHe Pecific ParTs then, bEcaUse SomE coPyRights don'T apply to SuB-pArTs Of tHe pacKAges. So I
<bMm> 'Ll jUsT adD them ALl to thE copyRighT aNd REfeRence thE DiFFErenT pAcKageS.
<bmM> THanks!
<CrimSUn> mAke sure That the coRreSPondInG cOpyrighT files are in plAcE as per neceSsAry, Too
<bmm> CRImsun: whaT?
bddebian> Hmm, phpmymoneyhasn't see n anups tre am  upd atefor several ye a rs : -(
<Toadstool> g'morni ng ev er y body <b ddebi an> Hey a  T o a dst oo l<To ad s to ol> h i b ddebian !
<tuxmani ac>  A nybody herek no w about ub unt u live conf? 
<L aserJo ck > d o es an ybo dy fi nd pit t i's pr actice of  r e titlin g  bugs " F i xe d" a nnoying?
<slomo_> cr i msun: imho weshould  g e ti t  (x gl) 
<bddebian >Laser J ock: Fi n al l y get t ing through t hose MOTUSc i enc e bugs ?:-) <Laser Jock>  u - u-s  actually
< crim sun> slom o_: ok ,  should I inter pret t hat  as  a + 1 ?<b dde bi a n>L as erJ o ck:  Ahh :)<b dd ebian > Hm m , I  see  my dmsis up  to date as w ell ..
< b mm_ > Ive  gota pa ck aging  quest ion:I' ve got one orig inal  source w hic hcre at es al l ot ofdif fer ent pac kages ( t heco r e an d addons), copyrig ht s ar e goingall ov e rth e  place.<b mm_ > Ic a n cre atem ul tiple pa ckages fr om  the si ng le sou rc e,and  that work s grea t. Howev er, I can't create m u ltiple/differ e nt c op y righ t f iles for th e pa r ts c urre n tl y
< b mm_>How s ho u ld this be handled?
<c ri msun>err,what?
<Lutin>  you shoul d k eep a si ngle co p yright for the  whol e packagei mo
<crim sun>debian/c opyrights h ould ref ere nce  al l t h e  c opyrights wit h spec if ic refe ren ces tofil esasper  n ecessary<Lutin>s/ th ewh le/ all t h e packag es 
<b mm > L utin: ok, so  then  I h av ea  ve ry larg e  c o p yrig ht  h olde rsli st
<c rims u n>that'scorrect,itp oten ti al ly canbe quite larg e<Lutin> in de ed<crims u n > if tha t's what it takes, howe v er, tha t's  what  ittakes.
<b mm>  crims un: thanks . I'll  addre fer e n ces t o th e p ec ific parts t hen , bec au se s ome cop yrights don't appl y  to  sub-parts of  th e pa c k ag es. So I
< bm m > ' l l  just add themall to the  c o py right andr efe re nce the  differ ent p a ckages. 
<bmm> Th anks!
<cr im sun> m ake  sure that  the cor respondin g  copy r ig ht fi les  are i npla ce as  per n e ces sary,  too
< bm m> cri msun:  w hat?
bddebian> Hmm,_phpmymoney hasn't_seen an upstream update_for several_years_:-(
<Toadstool> g'morning_everybody
<bddebian>_Heya Toadstool
<Toadstool> hi_bddebian!
<tuxmaniac> Anybody here_know about ubuntu live_conf?
<LaserJock> does anybody_find_pitti's practice of retitling bugs "Fixed" annoying?
<slomo_> crimsun: imho we should get it (xgl)
<bddebian>_LaserJock:_Finally getting_through_those_MOTUScience bugs? :-)
<LaserJock> u-u-s actually
<crimsun>_slomo_: ok, should I interpret_that as_a +1?
<bddebian> LaserJock: Ahh :)
<bddebian> Hmm, I see_mydms_is up to_date as well..
<bmm_> Ive got a packaging question: I've_got one original source which creates_allot of different_packages_(the_core and addons), copyrights_are going all over the place.
<bmm_>_I can create multiple packages from_the single source, and that works great._However, I can't create multiple/different copyright_files for the parts currently
<bmm_>_How should_this be handled?
<crimsun> err, what?
<Lutin>_you should keep_a single_copyright for the_whole package imo
<crimsun> debian/copyright should reference_all the copyrights_with specific references to files as_per_necessary
<Lutin> s/the whle/all_the_packages
<bmm>_Lutin: ok,_so then I_have_a very_large_copyright holders list
<crimsun> that's correct, it_potentially_can be quite large
<Lutin> indeed
<crimsun> if that's_what it takes, however,_that's_what it takes.
<bmm> crimsun:_thanks. I'll add references to_the pecific parts then, because some_copyrights don't_apply to_sub-parts of the packages. So I
<bmm> 'll just add them all_to the copyright and reference the_different packages.
<bmm> Thanks!
<crimsun> make_sure that_the_corresponding copyright files_are_in place_as per necessary, too
<bmm> crimsun: what?