main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-gtk-3555 or swt-gtk in swt.library.path, java.library.path or the jar file
<bdrung> \sh: you have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the xulrunner path
<\sh> bdrung: hmmm? on x86_64 with openjdk-6?
<bdrung> \sh: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 (or similar) -> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291758
<ubottu> bugs.eclipse.org bug 291758 in PackagingTools "[eclipse-build] SWT's browser code can't see XULRunner libraries on Debian unstable" [Normal,New]
<DktrKranz> dholbach: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.96 uploaded in Debian
<mok0> DktrKranz: impressive. ubuntu-dev-tools has a wickedly long chain of dependencies
<mok0> DktrKranz: many of which were -0ubuntu1 AFAIR
<DktrKranz> mok0: well, it's not the first upload in Debian, I already did many
<dholbach> DktrKranz: awesome!
<DktrKranz> (and yes, there are four rdeps)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I tried backporting ubuntu-dev-tools to jaunty, but had to give up
<DktrKranz> hehe
<mok0> DktrKranz: many new dependencies were introduced since then
<DktrKranz> yeah, with LP integration and API, you need several lazr* and launchpadlib
<mok0> DktrKranz: exactly
<mok0> DktrKranz: well done!
<DktrKranz> but I packaged them already ;)
<c_korn> an Ubuntu package in Debian? what secret conspiracy is this?.)
<DktrKranz> thanks ;)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I have my notes on
main " java.lang. UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt - gtk-3555 or swt - gtk in swt.library.path, java.library.path or the jar file 
 < bdrung > \sh: you have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the xulrunner path 
 < \sh > bdrung: hmmm? on x86_64 with openjdk-6? 
 < bdrung > \sh: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr / lib / xulrunner-1.9.2 (or exchangeable) - > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291758 
 < ubottu > bugs.eclipse.org hemipterous insect 291758 in PackagingTools " [ eclipse - build ] SWT's browser code can't see XULRunner libraries on Debian unstable " [ Normal, raw ] 
 < DktrKranz > dholbach: ubuntu - dev - tools 0.96 uploaded in Debian 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: impressive. ubuntu - dev - cock have a wickedly long range of colony 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: many of which were -0ubuntu1 AFAIR 
 < DktrKranz > mok0: well, it's not the first upload in Debian, I already dress many 
 < dholbach > DktrKranz: awesome! 
 < DktrKranz > (and yes, there are four rdeps) 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: I judge backporting ubuntu - dev - tools to jaunty, but had to give up 
 < DktrKranz > hehe 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: many new dependencies were introduced since then 
 < DktrKranz > yeah, with LP consolidation and API, you need several lazr * and launchpadlib 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: exactly 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: well perform! 
 < DktrKranz > but I packaged them already ;) 
 < c_korn > an Ubuntu package in Debian? what confidential conspiracy is this? .) 
 < DktrKranz > thanks ;) 
 < mok0 > DktrKranz: I have my note on
maij" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinyError: no swt-gtk-3555 or swv-gtk in swt.librxry.path, java.library.path or tie jqr fioe
<bdrung> \sh: you have tu set LD_LPBRARY_PATY to rhe xulrunisr path
<\sh> bdrhkg: hmkn? on x86_64 with opgnjdk-6?
<bdrung> \vh: export LD_LITRXRV_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 (or similar) -> htt[s://bugs.evllpse.org/bugs/shor_bug.bgy?id=291758
<ugottu> bugs.eclipse.org bug 291758 in PackafingToons "[eclipse-buikd] SWT's browser code can't dee DULRunner libraried on Debian unseqble" [Normal,Ndw]
<DktrKrane> bholbach: ubontu-dev-tools 0.96 uploaded in Debian
<ook0> DltrKranz: inpeesdhve. ubuntu-dxv-toolf has a wickccly lotg chaim of dependencles
<mon0> DjtrKranz: many of whici were -0ubuntu1 AFAIR
<DhtrKranz> koi0: well, it's not thw dirst uplmad kb Ddbizn, I alreafy vid many
<dhombach> DktrKeanz: awesome!
<DktrKramz> (qnd yes, there are fjuw rdeps)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I tried backportinc uguntu-dev-tools to jaunty, but had to give up
<DkjrKranz> here
<mok0> DktrKranz: many new dependencies were introdgced aknct bmen
<DyrrNranz> yeah, with LP integration and API, you neqs xeneral lazr* and lamnchpadlib
<mok0> DktrLrwna: exactly
<mok0> DytrKraua: sell done!
<DktrKranz> but I kackagwd them ajreacy ;)
<c_korn> an Ubuntu package un Debian? whct wecret conspiracy ns this?.)
<DktrKxanz> tnanks ;)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I have mv notea on
main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-gtk-3555 or swt-gtk in or jar file \sh: you have xulrunner <\sh> bdrung: hmmm? x86_64 with openjdk-6? \sh: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 (or similar) -> <ubottu> bugs.eclipse.org bug 291758 in PackagingTools "[eclipse-build] SWT's browser code can't see XULRunner on Debian unstable" [Normal,New] <DktrKranz> dholbach: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.96 uploaded in Debian <mok0> DktrKranz: ubuntu-dev-tools a long of dependencies <mok0> DktrKranz: many of which were -0ubuntu1 AFAIR <DktrKranz> mok0: well, it's not the upload in Debian, I already did many <dholbach> awesome! <DktrKranz> (and yes, are four rdeps) <mok0> DktrKranz: tried ubuntu-dev-tools to but to up <DktrKranz> hehe DktrKranz: many new dependencies were introduced since then <DktrKranz> yeah, with LP integration and API, you need lazr* and DktrKranz: exactly DktrKranz: done! but I packaged ;) <c_korn> an Ubuntu package in conspiracy is this?.) <DktrKranz> thanks ;) <mok0> DktrKranz: have my on
main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLiNkError: no sWt-gtk-3555 Or sWt-gTk In swT.libRary.path, java.liBRary.Path or the jar file
<bdrung> \Sh: you HaVE to sET Ld_LIBRaRY_PATH TO tHE XulRuNnEr pAtH
<\Sh> BdrunG: hmMm? on x86_64 wiTh openjdk-6?
<bDruNg> \Sh: export LD_LIbrArY_PATH=/usr/lIb/xUlrunner-1.9.2 (or siMilAr) -> httpS://bUgs.EClipsE.orG/bugs/Show_buG.Cgi?id=291758
<uBottu> bugs.EcLIpse.orG Bug 291758 in PaCKAgIngTOols "[eclipse-build] Swt's BRowser code can't See XULruNNeR LIbrAriEs on Debian UnStablE" [normal,NEW]
<DKTRkraNZ> dholbach: ubunTu-dev-tools 0.96 uPLoaDed in DEbIan
<MOk0> Dktrkranz: ImPResSive. ubuntu-dEv-toOls has a wiCkedly LOng chaiN Of depenDencieS
<moK0> DkTrKrANz: MaNy oF wHIch WErE -0ubUNtu1 aFAIR
<DktRKRaNz> mok0: Well, IT'S NOt thE fiRst uPload In Debian, I alreAdy Did mANy
<dHolbaCh> DktRKraNz: AwesoMe!
<Dktrkranz> (AnD yes, there are fouR rdePs)
<mok0> DktrkraNz: i trIeD backPOrting UbuNtu-Dev-toolS to jaunTY, buT hAD TO gIve up
<DktrKranz> hehe
<MoK0> dKtRKranz: maNy new dEPeNdENcies werE iNtrOducED Since Then
<dKtRKranz> yeAh, with lp iNtEgratioN aNd API, yOu NeeD seVeral LAzr* aNd launChpadlib
<Mok0> DkTRKranz: exactly
<mOK0> DktrKranz: welL DoNE!
<dkTRKraNz> bUt I packaged Them ALreaDy ;)
<c_kORn> An UBUntu pAckagE iN deBIan? what secret conspiRaCy is thIs?.)
<DktRKranz> thanks ;)
<mOk0> DktrKranZ: i HAve my notEs on
main" java.lang.Unsatisfie dLinkError : noswt -gt k- 3555  orswt-gtk in swt . libr ary.path, java.library .path  o r  the ja r fil e
<bdru n g> \ sh:  y ou  ha ve to  setLD_ LIBRARY _PATH to t hexu lrunner path <\ sh> bdrung : h mmm? on x86_ 64with o pe njd k -6?
< bdr ung>\sh: e x port L D_LIBRARY _P A TH=/us r /lib/xu l r un ner- 1.9.2 (or similar )  - >  https://bugs. eclips e. o rg / b ugs /sh ow_bug.cgi ?i d=291 7 58
<ubo t tu > b ugs . eclipse.org b ug 291758 i n  Pa ckagin gT ool s  "[ecl ipse- bu i ld]  SWT's brow sercode can' t seeX ULRunne r  librar ies on  De bia n un s ta bl e"[N o rma l ,N ew] <Dk trKranz>  d ho lbach : ub u n t u -dev -to ols0.96uploaded in D ebi an
< m ok0 > Dkt rKran z: i mp ressi ve. ub untu- de v-tools has a w icke dly longcha in  of  d epend e ncies<mo k0>  DktrKr anz: ma n y o fw h i ch  were -0ubuntu1 AF AI R <D ktrKranz > mok0 :  w el l , it's n ot  th e fi r s t upl oadi nDebian,I alre a dy  d id many 
< dholba ch > D ktr Kranz :  awe some!<DktrKra nz> ( a nd yes, therea re four rdeps ) 
< m o k0 >  Dkt rKr anz: I trie d ba c kpor ting ub unt u -dev- tools  t o  j a unty, but had to gi ve  up
<D ktrKr anz> hehe
<mo k0> DktrKr a n z : many n ew d e pe n dencies were i ntrod uced since then
<Dk trKra nz> yeah , with LP i ntegrati onand  AP I,y o uneed severall a zr*an d launc hpa dlib
<m ok0 > D ktr Kra nz : exactly 
<mok0>Dk tr Kr an z:welld one!
<Dk tr Kra nz > b ut Ip ackage d the m al re ad y  ;) 
<c_kor n >a n  Ubu nt upack age  i n Deb ian? wha t secre t conspir acy is t hi s? .)
<Dkt rKranz> thank s;)
<mok0>Dk trK ranz:I have mynotes on
main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:_no swt-gtk-3555_or swt-gtk in swt.library.path,_java.library.path or_the_jar file
<bdrung>_\sh:_you have to_set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to_the xulrunner path
<\sh> bdrung:_hmmm? on x86_64_with_openjdk-6?
<bdrung> \sh: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 (or similar) -> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291758
<ubottu> bugs.eclipse.org bug 291758 in PackagingTools "[eclipse-build]_SWT's_browser code_can't_see_XULRunner libraries on Debian unstable"_[Normal,New]
<DktrKranz> dholbach: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.96 uploaded_in Debian
<mok0>_DktrKranz: impressive. ubuntu-dev-tools has a wickedly long chain_of_dependencies
<mok0> DktrKranz: many_of which were -0ubuntu1 AFAIR
<DktrKranz> mok0: well, it's not_the first upload in Debian, I_already did many
<dholbach>_DktrKranz:_awesome!
<DktrKranz>_(and yes, there are_four rdeps)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I tried backporting_ubuntu-dev-tools to jaunty, but had to_give up
<DktrKranz> hehe
<mok0> DktrKranz: many new dependencies_were introduced since then
<DktrKranz> yeah, with_LP integration and API, you_need several_lazr* and launchpadlib
<mok0> DktrKranz: exactly
<mok0>_DktrKranz: well done!
<DktrKranz>_but I_packaged them already_;)
<c_korn> an Ubuntu package in Debian?_what secret conspiracy_is this?.)
<DktrKranz> thanks ;)
<mok0> DktrKranz: I_have_my notes on