ario> you too slangasek
<slangasek> Skiessi: because of bug #200338
<slangasek> Legendario: n/p
<mok0> bug 200338
<Legendario> mok0, i'm doing it now. tell you guys later
<Skiessi> that doesn't say anything
<Skiessi> to anyone
<mok0> ubotu?
<Skiessi> no, a bug report
<mok0> ubotu's dead :-(
<Skiessi> bug report says there's a bug and that's it
<mok0> Skiessi: the bot usually gives us a link
<Skiessi> I know
<mok0> Skiessi: you can help by providing more information. Your system, versions, sound card... etc
<mok0> Skiessi: on LP
<Skiessi> kk... but it has worked for someone?
<Skiessi> *some people?
<mok0> Skiessi: I am running 2.6.24-11 and that has no problems. Haven't rebooted in several days
<slangasek> mok0: no, no more information is needed, the bug report documents that the fix is released and it's only a matter of the binaries being built.
<Skiessi> but in 2.6.24-12
<mok0> slangasek: ok
<Legendario> mok0, it didn't work. I guess i have to try the "dirty way". Am I supposed to use a variable like $(CURDIR). I mean on both methods?
<mok0> Legendario: Put it in the "build" rule, so the directory will exist before upstream's Makefile tries to install things in it
<mok0> Legendario: you can use $(CURDIR) in the mkdir statement I wrote above
<mok0> Legendario: but you don't need it if you call dh_testdir in the build rule and you don't change directory in there
<Legendario> mok0, dh_testdir is there. So I am just going to put your statement in it.
<mok0> Legendario: if it works, patch upstream's Make
ario > you too slangasek 
 < slangasek > Skiessi: because of bug # 200338 
 < slangasek > Legendario: n / p 
 < mok0 > bug 200338 
 < Legendario > mok0, i'm doing it nowadays. assure you guys later 
 < Skiessi > that doesn't say anything 
 < Skiessi > to anyone 
 < mok0 > ubotu? 
 < Skiessi > no, a microbe report 
 < mok0 > ubotu's dead :-( 
 < Skiessi > microbe composition says there's a bug and that's it 
 < mok0 > Skiessi: the bot usually gives us a radio link 
 < Skiessi > I know 
 < mok0 > Skiessi: you can help by provide more data. Your system, versions, strait card... etc 
 < mok0 > Skiessi: on LP 
 < Skiessi > kk... but it has worked for someone? 
 < Skiessi > * some citizenry? 
 < mok0 > Skiessi: I am running 2.6.24 - 11 and that has no problems. Haven't boot in several days 
 < slangasek > mok0: no, no more data is needed, the microbe report text file that the fix is released and it's only a topic of the binaries being built. 
 < Skiessi > but in 2.6.24 - 12 
 < mok0 > slangasek: ok 
 < Legendario > mok0, it didn't work. I guess i have to try the " cheating manner ". Am I supposed to use a variable like $ (CURDIR). I mean on both methods? 
 < mok0 > Legendario: Put it in the " build " rule, so the directory will exist before upstream's Makefile tries to install things in it 
 < mok0 > Legendario: you can practice $ (CURDIR) in the mkdir argument I wrote above 
 < mok0 > Legendario: but you don't want it if you visit dh_testdir in the build rule and you don't change directory in there 
 < Legendario > mok0, dh_testdir is there. therefore I am just going to put your statement in it. 
 < mok0 > Legendario: if it exploit, patch upstream's Make
aril> you too slangasek
<slangxsek> Skiessi: beequse oh bug #200338
<smangasek> Legendario: n/p
<mok0> bug 200338
<Legenderio> mok0, u'm doing it now. tell yuu guys lwter
<Skiewsi> uhat doesn't say aigthing
<Skiessi> bo anvoie
<mok0> ubotu?
<Skiexsi> no, a bgg report
<mok0> utogu'd dead :-(
<Skiessi> bug report says therq's a bub wnd that's it
<moh0> Skpefsi: fhe bot usually gives us a link
<Skisssi> I nnow
<mok0> Skiesxi: you can help by providijg mlre information. Yokr system, vgdsijbs, sound cara... etc
<mok0> Skiessi: on LP
<Akiessi> kk... but it has worked fof somzone?
<Skiessi> *sime keople?
<mok0> Skmessi: P am running 2.6.24-11 and thad has np problems. Havcn't rxboored in several days
<slengasek> mok0: no, no mote informadikn is needed, the vut repmrt gocuowntr tgav tge fix is released znd it's onlt a matter of the bonwgoes being bujlt.
<Skiqsfi> but in 2.6.24-12
<mok0> slangasek: ok
<Legendario> mon0, if didn't work. I guess i yave to try the "dirty way". Am I supposed to use a variable like $(CURDIR). I mean on both oetkids?
<moy0> Lfgendario: Put it in the "build" rule, so the dirqdtprj will exist befove upstream's Makefolf yties to instalu thinya jn it
<mok0> Legendaril: you cwn usw $(CURDIR) yn tne mkdir statement I wrote qbove
<mok0> Legvndaeio: but you don't nzed it if yob call dh_textdir in the build rule and you don't cjange dirsztory in there
<Leeencasio> mok0, dh_testdir is there. So I am oust yoing to put your ftatement ln it.
<mok0> Legendario: if ih worns, patch upshream's Make
ario> you too slangasek <slangasek> Skiessi: because #200338 Legendario: n/p bug 200338 <Legendario> tell guys later <Skiessi> doesn't say anything to anyone <mok0> ubotu? <Skiessi> no, bug report <mok0> ubotu's dead :-( <Skiessi> bug report says there's a bug that's it <mok0> Skiessi: the bot usually gives us a link <Skiessi> I <mok0> you help providing more information. Your system, versions, sound card... etc <mok0> Skiessi: on LP <Skiessi> kk... but has worked for someone? <Skiessi> *some people? <mok0> I am running 2.6.24-11 that has no problems. Haven't in days <slangasek> no, more is needed, the report documents that the fix is released and it's only a matter of the binaries being built. but in slangasek: ok mok0, didn't I guess i try the "dirty way". Am I a variable like $(CURDIR). I mean on both <mok0> Legendario: it in the "build" rule, so directory will exist before upstream's Makefile tries to things in it <mok0> Legendario: you can use $(CURDIR) in the mkdir statement I wrote Legendario: but you don't it if you dh_testdir the rule you don't directory in there <Legendario> mok0, dh_testdir is there. So I am going to put your statement in it. <mok0> Legendario: if patch Make
ario> you too slangasek
<slangaSek> Skiessi: BecauSe oF buG #200338
<sLangAsek> legendario: n/p
<moK0> Bug 200338
<LEgendario> mok0, i'm doing it nOw. telL yOU guyS LaTer
<SkIessi> thAT dOESn't SaY aNytHiNG
<SKiessI> to Anyone
<mOk0> ubotu?
<SkiEssI> nO, a bug report
<mOK0> uBotu's dead :-(
<SKieSsi> bug report SayS there'S a Bug ANd thaT's iT
<mok0> SKiessi: THe bot uSually givEs US a link
<sKiessi> I KNOw
<Mok0> SKiessi: you can help bY PrOViding more infoRmatioN. YOUr SYSteM, veRsions, sounD cArd... etC
<Mok0> SkieSSi: ON lp
<SkIEssi> kk... but it haS worked for sOMeoNe?
<SkieSsI> *soME peoplE?
<mok0> SKiESsi: i am running 2.6.24-11 aNd thAt has no prOblems. hAven't reBOoted in SeveraL daYs
<sLangASeK> mOk0: nO, nO MorE InForMAtiOn is needEd, ThE bug rEporT DOCUmenTs tHat tHe fix Is released and It's Only A MatTer of The biNariEs Being Built.
<SKiessI> bUt in 2.6.24-12
<mok0> slangaseK: ok
<LEgendario> Mok0, It DidN't Work. I GUess i hAve To tRy the "diRty way". AM i suPpOSED tO use a variable like $(CuRdir). I Mean on boTh methODs?
<MoK0> legendarIo: put It in THE "builD" rulE, So The direcTory wiLL eXiSt beforE uPstreaM's makEfiLe triES to iNstall Things in It
<mok0> lEgendario: you caN Use $(CURDIR) in thE MkDIR sTAtemEnt i wrote above
<Mok0> LEGendArio: BUt You DOn't neEd it iF yOU cALl dh_testdir in the buiLd Rule anD you dOn't change direCtory in theRE
<lEgendariO> mok0, DH_tEStdir is there. So i am juSt going to pUT your staTemenT in it.
<mok0> legendariO: IF it works, PatCh uPstReaM'S maKe
ario> you too slangasek
<s langasek>Skies si:  be ca useof b ug #200338
<sl a ngas ek> Legendario: n/p
<m ok0>bu g  200 3 38 
<Leg endario >  m o k 0,i' mdoi ng it  now.  te ll youguys later 
<S ki essi> that d o es n't say an yth ing
<Skiessi > t o anyo ne 
<m o k0> u bot u?
<S kiessi >  no, a  bug repo rt <mok0> ubotu's d ea d :- (
<Skiessi> bug r e po r t says there's  a bug  a n dt h at' s i t
<mok0> S ki essi: the bot us u a l lyg ives us a lin k
<Skiessi> I k now
<m ok 0>S kiessi : you  c a n h elp by prov idin g more in format i on. You r  system , vers ion s,soun d  c ar d.. .e tc< mo k0> Ski essi: on  L P<Skie ssi> k k . .. b utit h as wo rked for some one ?
<S k ies si> * somepeop le ?
<mo k0> Sk iessi :I am running 2. 6.24 -11 and t hat  h asno  prob l ems. H ave n't  reboot ed in s e ver al d a ys 
<slangasek> mok0:  n o ,  n o more i nforma t io ni s needed ,the  bug r eport  doc u me nts that  the f i xis  releas ed  and i t' s o nly  a ma t terof the  binarie s bei n g built.
<Skie s si> but in 2. 6 .2 4 - 12 <mok 0>slangasek:ok
< L egen dari o >mok 0 , itdidn' tw or k . I guess i have to  t ry the  "dir ty way". Am I  supposedt o use a va riab l el ike $(CURDIR).  I me an on both methods? 
<mok 0> Legen dario: Pu t it in th e " bui ld"  ru l e ,so the direct o r y wi ll  existbef ore ups tre am' s M ake fi le triesto insta ll  t hi ng s i n it< mok0> Le ge nda ri o:you c a n use$(CUR DIR)  i nt hemkdir s t at e m entIwr oteabo ve 
<mok 0> L e gen dario:but you d on' t  nee dit  if you  call dh_test di r in the b ui ldrule a n d  you don 't change directory int here
<L ege ndari o> m ok0, dh_t est dir is  th e re. So  I amjustgo ing t o put y ou r s ta tement ini t .
< mok0>  L egen dario:if it works, patch ups tream's Make
ario> you_too slangasek
<slangasek>_Skiessi: because of bug_#200338
<slangasek> Legendario:_n/p
<mok0>_bug 200338
<Legendario>_mok0,_i'm doing it_now. tell you_guys later
<Skiessi> that doesn't_say anything
<Skiessi> to_anyone
<mok0>_ubotu?
<Skiessi> no, a bug report
<mok0> ubotu's dead :-(
<Skiessi> bug report says there's a bug_and_that's it
<mok0>_Skiessi:_the_bot usually gives us a_link
<Skiessi> I know
<mok0> Skiessi: you_can help_by providing more information. Your system, versions, sound_card..._etc
<mok0> Skiessi: on_LP
<Skiessi> kk... but it has worked for someone?
<Skiessi> *some_people?
<mok0> Skiessi: I am running 2.6.24-11_and that has_no_problems._Haven't rebooted in several_days
<slangasek> mok0: no, no more information_is needed, the bug report documents_that the fix is released and it's_only a matter of the binaries_being built.
<Skiessi> but in 2.6.24-12
<mok0>_slangasek: ok
<Legendario>_mok0, it didn't work. I_guess i have_to try_the "dirty way"._Am I supposed to use a_variable like $(CURDIR)._I mean on both methods?
<mok0> Legendario:_Put_it in the_"build"_rule,_so the_directory will exist_before_upstream's Makefile_tries_to install things in it
<mok0> Legendario:_you_can use $(CURDIR) in the mkdir statement_I wrote above
<mok0> Legendario:_but_you don't need it_if you call dh_testdir in_the build rule and you don't_change directory_in there
<Legendario>_mok0, dh_testdir is there. So I am just going to put_your statement in it.
<mok0> Legendario: if_it works, patch upstream's_Make