 beryl-settings gets it's icons
<lupine_85> it pulls it's + and - from gtk
<racarr> ok
<lupine_85> as for advanced... I'd say your standard cog
<lupine_85> Amaranth: not yet
<racarr> beryl-settings-simple has profiles for toned down
<Amaranth> imbrandon: wasn't, was just saying the beryl package is going to end up full of patches anyway
<racarr> majorly toned down
<racarr> settings
<lupine_85> racarr: but what's default? ;) (not bling central, I know, but certainly not minimal)
<lupine_85> does cube even work with workspaces?
<Amaranth> no
<imbrandon> no
<lupine_85> hrm
<lupine_85> wall or plane?
<Amaranth> to enable cube you set workspaces to 1 and hsize to 4, then enable the cube and rotate plugins
<Amaranth> no
<Hobbsee> ugh.  so it still doesnt work.
<lupine_85> cripes
<Hobbsee> when will they fix it?
<Amaranth> so you also need a plugin for the ctrl-alt-left/right/up/down keybindings for switching workspaces
<lupine_85> Hobbsee: I think it's going to end up with viewports for sides of cube, and each workspace is a different cube...
<lupine_85> in the current cube, anyway
<Hobbsee> lupine_85: having multiple cubes defies the point of spinning one.
<lupine_85> Hobbsee: having a cube with one side is also pointless ;)
<Hobbsee> lupine_85: indeed.  hence it should have as many sides as the workspaces have.
<Hobbsee> er, are
<racarr> Well, a cube made up of workspaces doesn't work
<racarr> because all workspaces have the same location in X coords
<Hobbsee> why not?  that's logical
<lupine_85> IMO it'd be better to have workspace-cube a seperate plugin, assuming it
beryl - settings gets it's icons 
 < lupine_85 > it pulls it's + and - from gtk 
 < racarr > ok 
 < lupine_85 > as for advance... I'd suppose your standard cog 
 < lupine_85 > Amaranth: not yet 
 < racarr > beryl - settings - childlike have profiles for toned down 
 < Amaranth > imbrandon: wasn't, was merely saying the beryl package is go to end up full of patches anyhow 
 < racarr > majorly toned down 
 < racarr > settings 
 < lupine_85 > racarr: but what's default option? ;) (not bling central, I acknowledge, but certainly not minimal) 
 < lupine_85 > does cube even work with workspaces? 
 < Amaranth > no 
 < imbrandon > no 
 < lupine_85 > hrm 
 < lupine_85 > wall or plane? 
 < Amaranth > to enable block you set workspaces to 1 and hsize to 4, then enable the cube and rotate plugins 
 < Amaranth > no 
 < Hobbsee > ugh.   then it still does nt work. 
 < lupine_85 > cripes 
 < Hobbsee > when will they pay back it? 
 < Amaranth > so you also necessitate a plugin for the ctrl - alt - left / right / up / down keybindings for switching workspaces 
 < lupine_85 > Hobbsee: I think it's belong to end up with viewports for sides of cube, and each workspace is a different cube... 
 < lupine_85 > in the current cube, anyhow 
 < Hobbsee > lupine_85: having multiple cubes defies the point of spinning one. 
 < lupine_85 > Hobbsee: having a cube with one side is also pointless ;) 
 < Hobbsee > lupine_85: indeed.   therefore it should suffer as many side as the workspace receive. 
 < Hobbsee > er, are 
 < racarr > Well, a cube made up of workspace doesn't work 
 < racarr > because all workspace have the same location in X coords 
 < Hobbsee > why not?   that's coherent 
 < lupine_85 > IMO it'd be better to have workspace - cube a seperate plugin, assuming it
 begyl-settings gets it's icoks
<lupine_85> it pulls it's + end - frkm gtk
<razarr> ok
<lupine_85> as for advancev... I'd say tour standard cog
<lupind_85> Amarantj: not yer
<racerr> beryl-settings-simple mcs prkniles hor toned down
<Akaranth> imtrandon: wasn't, far lust saying the beryl package is goigg to emd up full of pajches wnywzj
<rccarr> majorly toned down
<racarr> aettingv
<lupine_85> racart: but what's default? ;) (not bping central, I know, buh certainly not ninimal)
<lupind_85> does cubt zven work wjth workspaces?
<Amaranth> no
<imbranaon> np
<lupine_85> hrn
<lypijg_85> wall or plene?
<Amaganth> to enable cube fou set workspaces to 1 aid hwize to 4, then enable vhe cube and rotate klugins
<Amasauth> no
<Hobbsee> ugh.  so ir stinl dmesng wofk.
<lhpmne_85> criped
<Houbsee> when sill they fux it?
<Amaranth> so yoi woso need a plhgin fjr the ctrl-alt-left/right/up/down keybindings fod switching workspaces
<lypine_85> Hobbsee: I think it's goind to end up with viewports for sides of cube, and aach xofkskagc is q fifferent cube...
<lupine_85> in the current cube, anywwg
<Hpbnsee> lupine_85: havikg multiple cubes cevirf the point ow spinujnf one.
<lupine_85> Hobbsef: havind a cybe with jne xide is also pointless ;)
<Hobbwee> lupine_85: iudewd.  hence it shoulb have as mauy sidgs as yhe workspaces have.
<Hobbree> sr, are
<racarg> Well, a djbe made up of wurkxpdces doesn't work
<racarr> becwuse all xorks'aces haxe tne samq location in X coords
<Hobbsee> why jot?  jhat's nogical
<luplne_85> IMO it'd be better to have workspace-cube a sapegate plugnn, assmming it
beryl-settings gets it's icons <lupine_85> it pulls and from gtk ok <lupine_85> as standard <lupine_85> Amaranth: not <racarr> beryl-settings-simple has for toned down <Amaranth> imbrandon: wasn't, just saying the beryl package is going to end up full of patches <racarr> majorly toned down <racarr> settings <lupine_85> racarr: but what's default? ;) (not central, know, certainly minimal) <lupine_85> does cube even work with workspaces? <Amaranth> no <imbrandon> no <lupine_85> hrm <lupine_85> wall plane? <Amaranth> to enable cube you set workspaces 1 and hsize to then enable the cube and plugins no <Hobbsee> so still work. <lupine_85> cripes when will they fix it? <Amaranth> so you also need a plugin for the ctrl-alt-left/right/up/down keybindings for workspaces <lupine_85> think it's to up viewports for sides and each workspace is a different the current cube, anyway <Hobbsee> lupine_85: having multiple defies the of spinning one. <lupine_85> Hobbsee: having cube with one side is also pointless ;) lupine_85: indeed. hence it should have as many sides as the workspaces have. <Hobbsee> er, Well, a cube made of workspaces doesn't <racarr> all have same location X coords <Hobbsee> why not? that's logical <lupine_85> IMO it'd be to have workspace-cube a seperate plugin, assuming it
 beryl-settings gets it's icons
<Lupine_85> it puLls it'S + anD - frOm Gtk
<rAcarR> ok
<lupine_85> as for ADvanCed... I'd say your standard coG
<lupiNe_85> aMaraNTh: Not yeT
<racarr> BErYL-SetTiNgS-siMpLE hAs proFilEs for toNed down
<AmaRanTh> Imbrandon: wasN'T, wAs just sayiNg tHe beryl packaGe iS going To End UP full Of pAtcheS anywaY
<Racarr> Majorly toNeD Down
<raCArr> settINGs
<LupiNe_85> racarr: but what's dEFaULt? ;) (not bling centRal, I knOw, BUt CERtaInlY not minimaL)
<lUpine_85> DOes cube EVeN WORk wITh workspaces?
<AMaranth> no
<imBRanDon> no
<lUpIne_85> HRm
<lupiNe_85> walL oR PlaNe?
<Amaranth> tO enaBle cube yoU set woRKspaces TO 1 and hsiZe to 4, thEn eNabLe thE CuBe And RoTAte PLuGinS
<amaRanth> no
<HObBsEe> ugh.  So it STILL doeSnt Work.
<LupinE_85> cripes
<HobbseE> whEn wiLL thEy fix It?
<AmaRantH> sO you aLso neeD a pluGiN for the ctrl-alt-lEft/rIght/up/dowN keYbIndInGs for SWitchiNg wOrkSpaces
<lUpine_85> HoBBseE: I THINk It's going to end up witH vIEWpOrts for sIdes of CUbE, aND each worKsPacE is a DIFfereNt cuBE...
<lUpine_85> in tHe currENt CuBe, anywaY
<HObbsee> LuPinE_85: haVing mULtipLe cubeS defies tHe poiNT of spinning one.
<LUpine_85> Hobbsee: hAViNG A cUBe wiTh oNe side is alsO poiNTlesS ;)
<HobBSeE> luPIne_85: inDeed.  hEnCE iT Should have as many sidEs As the wOrkspAces have.
<HobbsEe> er, are
<racARR> well, a cubE madE Up OF workspaces doeSn't woRk
<racarr> beCAuse all wOrkspAces have The same loCATion in X cOorDs
<HObbSee> WHY nOt?  that's logicaL
<LUpinE_85> ImO it'd be BetTer to haVe wOrkSpaCe-cUbE a seperatE plugin, aSsUmInG iT
 beryl-settings gets it'sicons
<lup ine_8 5>itpu llsit's  + and - fromg tk
< racarr> ok
<lupine_85>  as f or adva n ce d...I'd say yo u r  st an da rdco g 
< lupin e_8 5> Amar anth: notyet 
< racarr> bery l -s ettings-si mpl e has profil esfor to ne d d o wn
<A mar anth>  imbra n don: w asn't, wa sj ust sa y ing the b er yl p ackage is going t o  e n d up full of p atches  a n yw a y 
<r aca rr> majorl ytoned down
<r a ca r r >  se t tings
<lupine _85> racarr :  bu t what 's  de f ault?;) (n ot bli ng central,  I k now, butcertai n ly notm inimal) 
<lupi ne_ 85>  doe s  c ub e e ve n  wo r kwit h  wo rkspaces ?<A maran th>n o < imbr and on>no
<l upine_85> hrm 
<l upin e _85 > wal l orplan e? 
<Ama ranth>  to e na ble cube you se t wo rkspacesto1and  h sizet o 4, t hen  en able th e cubea ndro t a t eplugins
<Amaranth>  n o <H obbsee>ugh. s oit still do es ntwork . <lupi ne_8 5 >cripes
< Hobbse e >wh en will  t hey fi xit? 
<A maran t h> s o youalso nee d a p l ugin for the c t rl-alt-left/r i gh t / up / down  ke ybindings f or s w itch ingw or ksp a ces
< lupin e_ 8 5> Hobbsee: I think it 's  going  to e nd up with vi ewports fo r s ides ofcube ,  a n d each workspa ce is  a differe n t cube.. .
<lu pine_85>  in the c u r rent cub e,any way 
<H o b bs ee> lupine_85 : havi ng  multip lecubes d efi esthe  po in t of spin ning one .<l up in e_8 5> Ho b bsee: ha vi ngacub e wit h  one s ide i s al so  p o int less ;) <H o b bsee >lu pine _85 :indee d. h enc e it sh ould have  as many  s id es as t he workspaces  h ave.
<Hobb se e>er, ar e <racarr>  Well, a cube made up o f  worksp ace s doe sn't  work
<ra car r> bec aus e  all w orkspa ces h av e t h e  same l oc ati on  in X coor d s 
<H obbse e>  why  not? that's logical
<lu p ine _85> IMO it'd  be  bet t e rtoh av e  wo rk s pac e - cube a seperate  plugin, a ss u mi ng it
 beryl-settings_gets it's_icons
<lupine_85> it pulls it's_+ and_-_from gtk
<racarr>_ok
<lupine_85>_as for advanced..._I'd say your_standard cog
<lupine_85> Amaranth: not_yet
<racarr> beryl-settings-simple has_profiles_for toned down
<Amaranth> imbrandon: wasn't, was just saying the beryl package is going to_end_up full_of_patches_anyway
<racarr> majorly toned down
<racarr> settings
<lupine_85>_racarr: but what's default? ;)_(not bling_central, I know, but certainly not minimal)
<lupine_85> does_cube_even work with_workspaces?
<Amaranth> no
<imbrandon> no
<lupine_85> hrm
<lupine_85> wall or plane?
<Amaranth> to enable_cube you set workspaces to 1_and hsize to_4,_then_enable the cube and_rotate plugins
<Amaranth> no
<Hobbsee> ugh.  so_it still doesnt work.
<lupine_85> cripes
<Hobbsee> when_will they fix it?
<Amaranth> so you also_need a plugin for the ctrl-alt-left/right/up/down_keybindings for switching workspaces
<lupine_85> Hobbsee:_I think_it's going to end up_with viewports for_sides of_cube, and each_workspace is a different cube...
<lupine_85> in_the current cube,_anyway
<Hobbsee> lupine_85: having multiple cubes defies_the_point of spinning_one.
<lupine_85>_Hobbsee:_having a_cube with one_side_is also_pointless_;)
<Hobbsee> lupine_85: indeed.  hence it_should_have as many sides as the workspaces_have.
<Hobbsee> er, are
<racarr> Well,_a_cube made up of_workspaces doesn't work
<racarr> because all_workspaces have the same location in_X coords
<Hobbsee>_why not?_ that's logical
<lupine_85> IMO it'd be better to have workspace-cube a_seperate plugin, assuming it