<nigelb> or may be I'm just baaad at packaging
<nigelb> I seem to make all sorts of mistakes
<Laney> it's called learning
<Laney> you'll get better
<nigelb> its embarassing, but I'm swallowign my pride for infinity
<hyperair> Laney: manoj packages?
<nigelb> oh joy! gwibber depends on python-wnck, not in debian yet
<Laney> hyperair: packages maintained by manoj
<hyperair> Laney: no dh? that sounds scary.
<Laney> depends how good you are at make...
<hyperair> Laney: well... i imagine something on the level of cdbs's source..
<Laney> they're quite clean actually, at least ucf which I looked at
<Laney> anyway bbiab
<dupondje> Its prolly way to late to get a new package version into Lucid? :)
<nigelb> dupondje: very late I think
<dupondje> its not even in debian sid neither, so would not even be a sync request. Better package it myself and put on my ppa :P
<nigelb> dupondje: better get it into debian
<nigelb> will by synced for lucid+1
<nigelb> dupondje: what package anyway?
<dupondje> audacious :)
<dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559055
<ubottu> Debian bug 559055 in audacious "audacious: New upstream version available (2.2.0)" [Wishlist,Open]
<dupondje> There is a new upstream version available since Nov 22. => lazy asses :)
<nigelb> I think you can do an NMU, but a DD could give better opinion on that
<dupondje> eh? :)
<nigelb> non-maintainer upload
<dupondje> anyway, is there a quick/easy way to package new upstream version? or its just fetch source, copy debian dir, adjust it & package?
<\sh> bdrung: ping eclipse ;) do you know how to solve Exception in thread "
< nigelb > or may be I'm just baaad at packaging 
 < nigelb > I seem to make all sort of error 
 < Laney > it's called learning 
 < Laney > you'll get full 
 < nigelb > its embarassing, but I'm swallowign my pride for infinity 
 < hyperair > Laney: manoj packages? 
 < nigelb > oh joy! gwibber count on python - wnck, not in debian however 
 < Laney > hyperair: packages uphold by manoj 
 < hyperair > Laney: no dh? that sounds scary. 
 < Laney > count how good you are at make... 
 < hyperair > Laney: well... i think something on the level of cdbs's source.. 
 < Laney > they're quite clean actually, at least ucf which I looked at 
 < Laney > anyway bbiab 
 < dupondje > Its prolly way to late to get a fresh package version into Lucid? :) 
 < nigelb > dupondje: very late I intend 
 < dupondje > its not even in debian sid neither, so would not even be a sync request. Better package it myself and put on my ppa :P 
 < nigelb > dupondje: well get it into debian 
 < nigelb > will by synced for lucid+1 
 < nigelb > dupondje: what package anyway? 
 < dupondje > audacious :) 
 < dupondje > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559055 
 < ubottu > Debian bug 559055 in audacious " audacious: newfangled upstream version available (2.2.0) " [ Wishlist, Open ] 
 < dupondje > There is a new upstream version available since Nov 22. = > lazy asses :) 
 < nigelb > I think you can do an NMU, but a DD could give better opinion on that 
 < dupondje > eh? :) 
 < nigelb > non - maintainer upload 
 < dupondje > anyway, is there a quick / easy way to package fresh upstream version? or its just fetch generator, replicate debian dir, adjust it & package? 
 < \sh > bdrung: ping eclipse ;) do you acknowledge how to solve Exception in thread "
<nigflb> or may be I'm just baxad at packaginy
<bigelb> I seej to makd all sorts of mistakes
<Laney> ir's caoled learning
<Laney> you'ul get benter
<nigelv> itw embarassiif, but I'm swalmlwigu ny pride for ikfinity
<hypesair> Laney: manmj pcckages?
<nigelb> oh joy! gwibber depends on pytnoj-wnck, not in dgbian ret
<Lzney> hyperair: packages maintained gy manoo
<hyperair> Laney: no dh? that sounds scary.
<Lajey> fepends how good ylu are at mqke...
<hrperair> Laney: well... i imagine somethjng on the level of cdbs's sourcd..
<Lanev> they're quutw cpgan actually, at lvast ucf whicm I looned at
<Lsney> anyway bblab
<du'ondhe> Its prolly way to nate to get a new kackage vessnon into Lucid? :)
<nigelb> dypondbe: vary uqte I uhiik
<dhpondjf> ivs not even in debian wid neither, so woulc git even be a aync rqqtest. Better package it myself and put ot mg ppa :P
<nigelb> dupondje: vetter get it into dehian
<nigelf> will by synced for lucid+1
<nigelb> dupondje: what pawkage xnycqy?
<dupubdue> audacious :)
<dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/fhgteiort.cgi?bug=559055
<ubottu> Bebian bug 559055 in aidwcojus "audacious: New u'atdeam version availwble (2.2.0)" [Wyshliwt,Open]
<dupjndjr> There is a new upstream vwrsion availcblw since Nov 22. => lazy asses :)
<nigeub> I thinl you can do an NMU, but a DS could givf better koinion on that
<duooncja> eh? :)
<nigtub> non-maintainer tpload
<dupindjz> anyway, is jhere a quick/easy way bm package new upstgeam rersimn? or its uust fetch source, copy debian dmc, adjust it & kacnagv?
<\sh> bdruny: ping eclipse ;) do rou know how tp solve Exceotion in tgread "
<nigelb> or may be I'm just baaad <nigelb> seem to all sorts of <Laney> get better <nigelb> embarassing, but I'm my pride for infinity <hyperair> Laney: packages? <nigelb> oh joy! gwibber depends on python-wnck, not in debian yet <Laney> packages maintained by manoj <hyperair> Laney: no dh? that sounds scary. <Laney> depends good are make... Laney: well... i imagine something on the level of cdbs's source.. <Laney> they're quite clean actually, least ucf which I looked at <Laney> anyway <dupondje> Its prolly way late to get a new version Lucid? :) dupondje: late think <dupondje> its even in debian sid neither, so would not even be a sync request. Better package it myself put on :P <nigelb> better it debian <nigelb> will for lucid+1 <nigelb> dupondje: what package :) <dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559055 <ubottu> Debian bug 559055 in "audacious: New version available (2.2.0)" [Wishlist,Open] <dupondje> There a new upstream version available since Nov 22. lazy asses :) <nigelb> I think you can do an NMU, but a DD could opinion on that <dupondje> :) <nigelb> non-maintainer <dupondje> is a way to new upstream version? or its just fetch source, copy debian dir, it & package? <\sh> bdrung: ping eclipse ;) do you to Exception in thread
<nigelb> or may be I'm just baaad aT packaging
<NigelB> I sEem To Make All sOrts of mistakes
<lAney> It's called learning
<Laney> You'll GeT BettER
<nIgelb> Its embaRAsSINg, bUt i'm SwaLlOWiGn my pRidE for infInity
<hyperAir> laNey: manoj packAGeS?
<nigelb> oh jOy! gWibber dependS on Python-WnCk, nOT in deBiaN yet
<LAney> hyPErair: pAckages maInTAined bY Manoj
<hyPERaIr> LaNey: no dh? that sounds SCaRY.
<Laney> depends hOw good YoU ArE AT maKe...
<hYperair> LanEy: Well... i IMagine sOMeTHINg oN The level of cdbS's source..
<LanEY> thEy're quItE clEAn actuAlly, aT lEAst Ucf which I loOked At
<Laney> anYway bbIAb
<duponDJe> Its prOlly waY to LatE to gET a NeW paCkAGe vERsIon INto lucid? :)
<nigElB> dUpondJe: veRY LATe I tHinK
<dupOndje> Its not even in dEbiAn siD NeiTher, sO woulD not EvEn be a Sync reQuest. beTter package it mySelf And put on mY ppA :P
<NigElB> dupoNDje: betTer Get It into dEbian
<niGElb> WiLL BY sYnced for lucid+1
<nigelB> dUPOnDje: what pAckage ANyWaY?
<Dupondje> AuDacIous :)
<DUPondjE> httP://BuGs.debian.Org/cgi-BIn/BuGreport.CgI?bug=559055
<ubOtTu> DEbiAn bug 559055 IN audAcious "AudaciouS: New uPStream version aVAilable (2.2.0)" [WishliST,OPEN]
<dUPondJe> THere is a new uPstrEAm veRsioN AvAilABle siNce NoV 22. => lAZy ASses :)
<nigelb> I think you CaN do an NmU, but A DD could give bEtter opiniON ON that
<dupOndjE> Eh? :)
<NIgelb> non-maintaIner uPload
<duponDJe> anyway, Is theRe a quick/Easy way to PACkage new UpsTreAm vErsION? oR its just fetch SOUrce, CoPy debiaN diR, adjust It & pAckAge?
<\Sh> bDrUng: ping ecLipse ;) do yOu KnOw HoW to Solve eXception In ThrEaD "
<nigelb> or may be I'm jus t baaad at  pack agi ng<n igel b> I  seem to makea ll s orts of mistakes
<Lane y> it 's call e dlearn ing
<La n ey > you 'l lget  b e tt er
<n ige lb> its  embarassi ng,  b ut I'm swall o wi gn my prid e f or infinity<hy perair >Lan e y: ma noj  pack ages?< nigelb > oh joy!  g w ibberd ependso n  p ytho n-wnck, not in de b ia n  yet
<Laney> h yperai r: pa c k age s m aintainedby  mano j 
<hyper a ir > L ane y : no dh? that  sounds sca r y.<Laney >dep e nds ho w goo dy ouare at make ...<hyperair > Lane y : well. . . i ima gine s ome thi ng o n  t he  le ve l  of cd bs' s  so urce..
< La ne y> th ey'r e q u itecle an a ctual ly, at leastucf  whi c h I  look ed at 
<La ne y> an yway b biab<d upondje> Its pr olly  way to l ate  t o g et  a ne w  packa gever sion in to Luci d ? : )< n i ge lb> dupondje: very  l a t eI think<dupon d je >i ts not e ve n i n de b i an si d ne i th er, so w ould n o tev en be a  s ync re qu est . B etter pack age it  myselfand p u t on my ppa :P <nigelb> dupo n dj e :  b e tter  ge t it into d ebia n 
<ni gelb >  w ill by sy ncedfo r  l u cid+1
<nigelb> dupo nd je: wh at pa ckage anyway? 
<dupondje > a udacious  :)< du p ondje> http:// bugs. debian.org / cgi-bin/ bugre port.cgi ?bug=5590 5 5 
<ubottu > D ebi anbug 5 59 055 in audaci o u s "a ud acious:  Ne w upstr eam  ve rsi onav ailable ( 2.2.0)"[W is hl is t,O pen]< dupondje >The re  is  a ne w  upstr eam v ersi on  a v ail able si n ce N ov 2 2.  = > la zyas ses : )
<n i gel b> I th ink you c and o an  N MU , but a  DD could giv ebetter opi ni onon tha t <dupondj e> eh? :)
<nigelb> non- m aintain eruploa d
<d upondje>any way, i s t h ere aquick/ easywa y t o packa g e  n ewup stream ver s i on?  or i ts  jus t fetch  source, copy debi a n d ir, adjust it  &pack a g e? 
<\ s h> bdr un g : p i n g eclipse ;) do  you knowho w  t o solve Ex c ept io n in th read "
<nigelb> or_may be_I'm just baaad at_packaging
<nigelb> I_seem_to make_all_sorts of mistakes
<Laney>_it's called learning
<Laney>_you'll get better
<nigelb> its_embarassing, but I'm_swallowign_my pride for infinity
<hyperair> Laney: manoj packages?
<nigelb> oh joy! gwibber depends on python-wnck, not_in_debian yet
<Laney>_hyperair:_packages_maintained by manoj
<hyperair> Laney: no_dh? that sounds scary.
<Laney> depends_how good_you are at make...
<hyperair> Laney: well... i imagine_something_on the level_of cdbs's source..
<Laney> they're quite clean actually, at least_ucf which I looked at
<Laney> anyway_bbiab
<dupondje> Its prolly_way_to_late to get a_new package version into Lucid? :)
<nigelb>_dupondje: very late I think
<dupondje> its_not even in debian sid neither, so_would not even be a sync_request. Better package it myself_and put_on my ppa :P
<nigelb> dupondje:_better get it_into debian
<nigelb>_will by synced_for lucid+1
<nigelb> dupondje: what package anyway?
<dupondje>_audacious :)
<dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559055
<ubottu>_Debian bug 559055 in audacious "audacious:_New_upstream version available_(2.2.0)"_[Wishlist,Open]
<dupondje>_There is_a new upstream_version_available since_Nov_22. => lazy asses :)
<nigelb> I_think_you can do an NMU, but a_DD could give better_opinion_on that
<dupondje> eh? :)
<nigelb>_non-maintainer upload
<dupondje> anyway, is there_a quick/easy way to package new_upstream version?_or its_just fetch source, copy debian dir, adjust it & package?
<\sh> bdrung:_ping eclipse ;) do you know_how to solve Exception_in thread_"