 both distros.
<savvas> _cooper_: and when it is included in debian, you can bump the version from 2.1.1-0ubuntu1 to 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 :)
<cody-somerville> nhandler, How was the package the last time you looked at it? I'
<_cooper_> The quoted paragraph just made me think if I'm doing it in the wrong order.
<cody-somerville> nhandler, I'd like to get gnomescan into jaunty
<nhandler> cody-somerville: I honestly can't remember. I can take another look at it if you want
<cody-somerville> nhandler, that would be great
<savvas> _cooper_: just follow my suggestion, I think there won't be any problems! :) you can send your ubuntu version to be reviewed at http://revu.ubuntuwire.org
<_cooper_> Ah. If this won't cause confusion, then I'll do both.
<nhandler> cody-somerville: Isn't gnomescan already in the repositories?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, it is, yup
<nhandler> cody-somerville: So why are you going through REVU?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, I'm not
<cody-somerville> nhandler, someone else is
<nhandler> Why?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, "
<cody-somerville> onkarshinde, this packaging is completely rewritten, just like the software itself, this is why i pass the process from the beginning. "
<_cooper_> savvas: Thanks.
<james_w> directhex: hey, were you Cced on the reject of monodevelop-debugger-gdb
<james_w>?
<nhandler> cody-somerville: I guess that is what I get for not actually opening up the REVU page ;)
<_cooper_> savvas: Any other hints saving me to be flamed all over when submitting my first package? #-)
<directhex> no, i wasn't
<directhex> unless it happened since i last ran my mail client
<directhex> mmm, no, nothing here
<persia> _cooper
both distros. 
 < savvas > _ cooper _: and when it is included in debian, you can bump the version from 2.1.1 - 0ubuntu1 to 2.1.1 - 1ubuntu1 :) 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, How was the package the final meter you looked at it? I' 
 < _ cooper _ > The quoted paragraph just make me think if I'm doing it in the ill-timed club. 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, I'd like to scram gnomescan into jaunty 
 < nhandler > cody - somerville: I honestly can't remember. I can take another spirit at it if you want 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, that would be great 
 < savvas > _ cooper _: just succeed my suggestion, I think there won't be any problems! :) you can send your ubuntu version to be review at http://revu.ubuntuwire.org 
 < _ cooper _ > Ah. If this won't cause confusion, then I'll do both. 
 < nhandler > cody - somerville: Isn't gnomescan already in the repositories? 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, it is, yup 
 < nhandler > cody - somerville: indeed why are you going through REVU? 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, I'm not 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, someone else is 
 < nhandler > Why? 
 < cody - somerville > nhandler, " 
 < cody - somerville > onkarshinde, this packaging is completely rewritten, merely like the software itself, this is why i pass the process from the beginning. " 
 < _ cooper _ > savvas: Thanks. 
 < james_w > directhex: hey, were you Cced on the reject of monodevelop - debugger - gdb 
 < james_w >? 
 < nhandler > cody - somerville: I guess that is what I get for not actually open up the REVU page ;) 
 < _ cooper _ > savvas: Any other hints saving me to be flamed all all over when render my first package? # -) 
 < directhex > no, i wasn't 
 < directhex > unless it happened since i last ran my mail client 
 < directhex > mmm, no, nothing here 
 < persia > _ cooper
 bohh distros.
<savvas> _cooper_: xnd when it is nbcludev in degian, you can bump the version from 2.1.1-0uuunty1 to 2.1.1-1ybuntu1 :)
<cody-somerville> vhandler, Jow was rhe kackage the last vjme you lookes at nt? I'
<_cooper_> The qooted paragrdph just made ke tkink if I'm doing it in the wrong ordqr.
<cody-spmfrville> nhandlgr, I'd jike no get gnomescan into jaunty
<nhahdler> cmdy-somerville: I honestly can't remember. L caj take another loon at it if iku rqnt
<cody-somerxille> nhandler, that woold be great
<savvas> _cooper_: just fullow my suggesjnin, L think therx won't be any problems! :) yog can srnd your ubuntm verviob to be reviewed at hvtp://revu.ubuntuwire.org
<_sooper_> Ah. Iy this won't cause conduwion, jhen H'll ai buth.
<hhendmer> cofy-skmerville: Jsn't gnomesxan already in the te[isitories?
<cody-aomervylje> nhandler, it is, yup
<nhandler> cody-somernills: So why are you going rhrough REVU?
<cody-somergille> nhagdler, I'm not
<cody-somerville> nhandler, someone else hs
<nhaiduer> Wmy?
<coat-slmerville> nhandler, "
<cody-somerville> onkarshinde, fhos packaging is gompletely rewrittrn, jift like the suftwarz ifself, this is why l pass jhe pricess froi thr beginning. "
<_cooper_> savvas: Tyanks.
<james_w> birwcthex: hey, were yob Cced on thz rejevt of monodevelop-debugger-gdb
<lames_w>?
<hhandler> cofy-somervimue: I guess that ks ehdt I get for not actually jpening u' the REVU pxge ;)
<_vooper_> savvas: Anj othcs hints saving me ho be fnamed all lver when submitting my first perkage? #-)
<directhgx> to, p wasn't
<dixecthew> unless it hap[ened since i kast rau my mxil client
<sirecthxx> mmm, no, noehing here
<pervla> _cooper
both distros. <savvas> _cooper_: and when it in you can the version from nhandler, was the package last time you at it? I' <_cooper_> The quoted just made me think if I'm doing it in the wrong order. <cody-somerville> I'd like to get gnomescan into jaunty <nhandler> cody-somerville: I honestly can't remember. can another at if you want <cody-somerville> nhandler, that would be great <savvas> _cooper_: just follow my suggestion, I there won't be any problems! :) you can your ubuntu version to reviewed at http://revu.ubuntuwire.org <_cooper_> Ah. this cause confusion, I'll both. cody-somerville: Isn't gnomescan in the repositories? <cody-somerville> nhandler, it is, yup <nhandler> cody-somerville: So why are you going through REVU? nhandler, I'm nhandler, someone is Why? nhandler, " <cody-somerville> packaging is completely rewritten, just like this is why i pass the process from beginning. " savvas: Thanks. <james_w> directhex: hey, were Cced on the reject of monodevelop-debugger-gdb <james_w>? <nhandler> I guess that is what I get for not actually opening up the REVU page savvas: Any other hints me to be all when my package? #-) no, i wasn't <directhex> unless it happened since i last ran mail client <directhex> mmm, no, nothing here <persia> _cooper
 both distros.
<savvas> _cooper_: anD when it is iNcludEd iN deBiAn, yoU can Bump the version FRom 2.1.1-0uBuntu1 to 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 :)
<cody-somerVille> NhANdleR, hoW was tHe packaGE tHE LasT tImE yoU lOOkEd at iT? I'
<_cOoper_> ThE quoted parAgrApH just made me tHInK if I'm doing It iN the wrong ordEr.
<cOdy-somErVilLE> nhanDleR, I'd liKe to geT GnomesCan into jaUnTY
<nhandLEr> cody-sOMErVillE: I honestly can't remEMbER. I can take anothEr look At IT iF YOu wAnt
<Cody-somervIlLe> nhaNDler, thaT WoULD Be gREat
<savvas> _coopEr_: just folloW My sUggestIoN, I tHInk theRe won'T bE Any Problems! :) you Can sEnd your ubUntu veRSion to bE RevieweD at httP://reVu.uBuntUWiRe.Org
<_CoOPer_> aH. IF thIS woN't cause cOnFuSion, tHen I'LL DO Both.
<NhaNdleR> cody-Somerville: Isn'T gnOmesCAn aLreadY in thE repOsItoriEs?
<cody-SomerViLle> nhandler, it is, Yup
<nHandler> coDy-sOmErvIlLe: So wHY are yoU goIng Through rEVU?
<codY-SomErVILLe> Nhandler, I'm not
<cody-sOmERViLle> nhandLer, somEOnE eLSe is
<nhanDlEr> WHy?
<coDY-SomerVillE> NhAndler, "
<coDy-someRViLlE> onkarsHiNde, thiS pAckAgiNg is cOMpleTely reWritten, jUst liKE the software itSElf, this is why i PAsS THe PRoceSs fRom the beginNing. "
<_COopeR_> savVAs: thaNKs.
<jamEs_w> diReCThEX: hey, were you Cced on thE rEject oF monoDevelop-debuggEr-gdb
<james_W>?
<NHAndler> coDy-soMErVIlle: I guess that Is whaT I get for noT Actually OpeniNg up the ReVU page ;)
<_coOPEr_> savvas: any OthEr hIntS SAvIng me to be flamED All oVeR when suBmiTting my FirSt pAckAge? #-)
<DiRecthex> no, I wasn't
<diReCtHeX> uNleSs it hAPpened siNcE i lAsT raN my maIL clienT
<direCtheX> mMm, NO, noThing heRE
<pERSia> _cOoPeR
 both distros.
<savvas> _c ooper_: an d whe n i t i sincl uded  in debian, yo u  can  bump the version from  2.1. 1- 0 ubun t u1  to 2 .1.1-1u b un t u 1 : )<c ody -s o me rvill e>nhandle r, How was  th epackage thel as t time you  lo oked at it?I'<_coop er _>T he qu ote d par agraph just m ade me th in k  if I' m  doingi t  i n th e wrong order.
<c o dy - somerville> nh andler ,I 'd l ike  to  get gnome sc an in t o jaunt y 
< n h a ndl e r> cody-somer ville: I ho n est ly can 't  re m ember.  I ca nt ake  another lo ok a t it if y ou wan t 
<cody- s omervil le> nh and ler , th a two uld  b e  gr e at 
<s a vva s> _coop er _:  just  fol l o w my s ugg esti on, I  think therewon 't b e  an y pro blems ! :)  y ou ca n send  your  u buntu version t o be  reviewed  at  h ttp :/ /revu . ubuntu wir e.o rg
<_co oper_>A h.If t h is  won't cause confu si o n ,then I'l l do b o th .< nhandler >cod y-so m e rvill e: I s n' t gnomes can al r ea dy  in the  r eposit or ies ?
< cody- s omer ville>  nhandle r, it is, yup
<nhand l er> cody-some r vi l l e: So w hyare you goi ng t h roug h RE V U? 
<c o dy-so mervi ll e >n handler, I'm not
<c od y-some rvill e> nhandler,someone el s e is
<nhan dler >  W h y?
<cody-somer ville > nhandler ,  "
<cody -some rville>onkarshin d e , this p ack agi ngisc o mp letely rewrit t e n, j us t likethe  softwa reits elf , t hi s is whyi pass t he  p ro ce ssfromt he begin ni ng.  " 
<_ coope r _> sav vas:Than ks .< jam es_w> d i re c t hex:  h ey , we reyo u Cce d on the  reject  of monod eve l op-d eb ug ger-gdb 
<james_w>?
< nh andler> co dy -so mervil l e : I gues s that is what I get fo r  not ac tua lly o peni ng up the  RE VU pag e ; ) 
<_coo per_>savva s:  An y other h in tssa ving me to b e f lamed  a ll o ver whe n submitting my fi r stpackage? #-)<di rect h e x>  no ,  i was n' t 
<d i r ecthex> unlessit happene ds in ce i lastr anmy  mail c lient
< direc t hex> mm m, no, no thing her e<per s i a>_cooper
 both_distros.
<savvas> _cooper_:_and when it is_included in_debian,_you can_bump_the version from_2.1.1-0ubuntu1 to 2.1.1-1ubuntu1_:)
<cody-somerville> nhandler, How was_the package the_last_time you looked at it? I'
<_cooper_> The quoted paragraph just made me think if_I'm_doing it_in_the_wrong order.
<cody-somerville> nhandler, I'd like_to get gnomescan into jaunty
<nhandler>_cody-somerville: I_honestly can't remember. I can take another look_at_it if you_want
<cody-somerville> nhandler, that would be great
<savvas> _cooper_: just follow_my suggestion, I think there won't_be any problems!_:)_you_can send your ubuntu_version to be reviewed at http://revu.ubuntuwire.org
<_cooper_>_Ah. If this won't cause confusion,_then I'll do both.
<nhandler> cody-somerville: Isn't gnomescan_already in the repositories?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, it_is, yup
<nhandler> cody-somerville: So why_are you_going through REVU?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, I'm_not
<cody-somerville> nhandler, someone_else is
<nhandler>_Why?
<cody-somerville> nhandler, "
<cody-somerville>_onkarshinde, this packaging is completely rewritten,_just like the_software itself, this is why i_pass_the process from_the_beginning._"
<_cooper_> savvas:_Thanks.
<james_w> directhex: hey,_were_you Cced_on_the reject of monodevelop-debugger-gdb
<james_w>?
<nhandler> cody-somerville: I_guess_that is what I get for not_actually opening up the_REVU_page ;)
<_cooper_> savvas: Any_other hints saving me to_be flamed all over when submitting_my first_package? #-)
<directhex>_no, i wasn't
<directhex> unless it happened since i last ran my_mail client
<directhex> mmm, no, nothing here
<persia>__cooper