 worth checking with asac or mvo to see if it's part of the current ThirdPartyApt plan.
<persia> If it's just duplicate to gdebi and friends, then dropping it might be useful, as it's Ubuntu-local.
<savvas> never tried it, I'll give it a go :)
<lfaraone> Hi, I'm seeing multiple additional LOAD_CYCLES on my laptop after about 2 minutes, should I be concerned?
<savvas> wrong channel :p
<binarymutant> opinion question: what would be faster, running my debian package through revu to update a package already in Jaunty or waiting for Debian's ftp-masters to move it out of the new queue?
<_cooper_> Thanks for help, I think I'll return with some questions later...
<ScottK> binarymutant: We're past Feature Freeze for Jaunty, so is this a bug fix only change?
<binarymutant> ScottK, there aren't any bugs in the package but the one in Debian is much more "cleaner"
<binarymutant> should I just leave it alone?
<ScottK> So you got it into Ubuntu, then got an improved version into Debian that's still in New?
<ScottK> binarymutant: ^^
<binarymutant> ya
<binarymutant> it conforms better to Debian's python-policy
<ScottK> I'd file a bugg with a debdiff to a fixed version in it.  We generally only use REVU for new packages.
<ScottK> Then subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
<ScottK> Also make sure it works with Python 2.6....
<binarymutant> I should send a post to ubuntu-universe-sponsors with a debdiff?
<binarymutant> cool thanks for the help, I found the wiki page for it
<kostmo> Is there an official "metapackage" that includes all of the tools listed here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Packaging%20Tools
<kostmo>?
<kostmo> I think it would be cool to have such a metapackage linked to from that wiki
<JanC> kostmo: file a wishlist bug (of it doesn't exist yet)
worth checking with asac or mvo to see if it's part of the current ThirdPartyApt design. 
 < persia > If it's barely duplicate to gdebi and friends, then dropping it might be utilitarian, as it's Ubuntu - local. 
 < savvas > never tried it, I'll grant it a go :) 
 < lfaraone > Hi, I'm seeing multiple extra LOAD_CYCLES on my laptop after approximately 2 minutes, should I be concerned? 
 < savvas > wrong channel :p 
 < binarymutant > opinion motion: what would be faster, running my debian software through revu to update a package already in Jaunty or waiting for Debian's ftp - masters to move it out of the new queue? 
 < _ cooper _ > Thanks for help, I remember I'll return with some questions later... 
 < ScottK > binarymutant: We're past Feature Freeze for Jaunty, indeed is this a bug fix only change? 
 < binarymutant > ScottK, there ben't any bugs in the package but the one in Debian is much more " cleaner " 
 < binarymutant > should I just entrust it alone? 
 < ScottK > So you got it into Ubuntu, then got an improved version into Debian that's however in New? 
 < ScottK > binarymutant: ^^ 
 < binarymutant > ya 
 < binarymutant > it conforms better to Debian's python - policy 
 < ScottK > I'd file a bugg with a debdiff to a fixed version in it.   We generally only use REVU for new packages. 
 < ScottK > Then sign ubuntu - universe - sponsors. 
 < ScottK > besides name certain it works with Python 2.6.... 
 < binarymutant > I should send a post to ubuntu - universe - sponsors with a debdiff? 
 < binarymutant > cool thanks for the help, I found the wiki page for it 
 < kostmo > Is there an official " metapackage " that include all of the tools listed here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Packaging%20Tools 
 < kostmo >? 
 < kostmo > I think it would be cool to have such a metapackage linked to from that wiki 
 < JanC > kostmo: file a wishlist microbe (of it doesn't exist yet )
 wogth checking with asac ov mvo to see if nr's parv of ths curreng ThirdPartyApt plan.
<persia> Ih it'w jusu duplicate to gdebk and frivnds, then drokping it might be useful, as it's Mbuntb-lical.
<savvas> nevgr tried it, H'll give it a co :)
<lyaraone> Hi, I'm seeing multiple additijnal LOSD_FYCLES on my lwptok aster about 2 minutes, should I be concerhed?
<savves> wrong channek :p
<binarymutant> opinion qufstiln: what would be fwster, runnibg mr debian packxge through revu to upsate a package already in Jaunth or caiting for Dwbiwt's ftp-mastecs to iove it out of the naw queur?
<_cooper_> Thanks foc heop, I think I'll return with some questiogs later...
<SwoctK> binarymutant: We're pqst Fgatura Frdwze fod Oauhty, so is this a buf fix only xhange?
<binarymutant> XcjnyK, there areh't any btgs in the package but the one in Debiat ia much more "cleaner"
<binaeymutant> should I jusj leave it alone?
<ScottK> So you got it into Ubuntu, then got at impcoxed vcrsiub lnto Debian that's still in New?
<ScottK> binarymueznu: ^^
<bpnarymutant> ya
<bincrymutant> it congogmx better to Decian's 'gtgon-policy
<ScottK> I'd file a bugg with a dtbdifg to a fixed version in it.  We generallj onoy use REVU for nec packages.
<ScuttK> Then subscribe ubuntu-univerre-spknsors.
<ScottN> Also maid sure it works ditm Pfthon 2.6....
<binarymutant> I shoulq send a 'ost co ubuntj-uniferse-s[onsors wihh a debdiff?
<binarymutant> cool tvanks for hhe help, I found the wiki page hpr it
<kostmo> Os thvre an ofyicial "metapackage" ehat includes cll of tke toous listed gere: htvps://wiki.ubuntt.com/PackagingCoide/Complete#Peckaging%20Tjols
<jostno>?
<kostmu> I think it woild be cool to have such a metapackagc linysd to from that wiji
<JanC> kostmo: fole a ridhkifd bug (of it goesv't dcist het)
worth checking with asac or mvo to it's of the ThirdPartyApt plan. <persia> gdebi friends, then dropping might be useful, it's Ubuntu-local. <savvas> never tried it, give it a go :) <lfaraone> Hi, I'm seeing multiple additional LOAD_CYCLES on laptop after about 2 minutes, should I be concerned? <savvas> wrong channel :p opinion what be running my debian package through revu to update a package already in Jaunty or waiting for ftp-masters to move it out of the new <_cooper_> Thanks for help, think I'll return with some later... binarymutant: We're Feature for so is this bug fix only change? <binarymutant> ScottK, there aren't any bugs in the package but the one in is much <binarymutant> should just it <ScottK> So you into Ubuntu, then got an improved that's still in New? <ScottK> binarymutant: ^^ <binarymutant> <binarymutant> it better to Debian's python-policy <ScottK> I'd a bugg with a debdiff to a fixed in it. We generally only use REVU for new packages. <ScottK> Then subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors. <ScottK> sure it works with 2.6.... <binarymutant> I send post ubuntu-universe-sponsors a debdiff? cool thanks for the help, I found the wiki page for <kostmo> Is there an official "metapackage" that includes all of listed https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Packaging%20Tools <kostmo>? <kostmo> think it would be to such a metapackage linked that <JanC> wishlist (of doesn't exist yet)
 worth checking with asac or mvO to see if it'S part Of tHe cUrRent thirDPartyApt plan.
<pERsia> if it's just duplicate to gdEbi anD fRIendS, ThEn droPping it MIgHT Be uSeFuL, as It'S ubUntu-lOcaL.
<savvas> Never tried It, I'Ll Give it a go :)
<lfaRAoNe> Hi, I'm seeiNg mUltiple additIonAl LOAD_cYcLEs On my lAptOp aftEr abouT 2 MinuteS, should I bE cONcerneD?
<Savvas> wRONg ChanNel :p
<binarymutant> oPInIOn question: what Would bE fAStER, RunNinG my debian pAcKage tHRough reVU tO UPDatE A package alreaDy in Jaunty oR WaiTing foR DEbiAN's ftp-mAsterS tO MovE it out of the New qUeue?
<_coopeR_> ThankS For help, i Think I'lL returN wiTh sOme qUEsTiOns LaTEr...
<SCOtTK> bINarYmutant: WE'rE pAst FeAturE fREEze fOr JAuntY, so is This a bug fix onLy cHangE?
<BinArymuTant> SCottk, tHere aRen't anY bugs In The package but thE one In Debian iS muCh MorE "cLeaneR"
<BinaryMutAnt> Should I Just leaVE it AlONE?
<scOttK> So you got it into ubUNTu, Then got aN improVEd VeRSion into deBiaN thaT'S Still In NeW?
<scOttK> binaRymutaNT: ^^
<bInArymutaNt> Ya
<binaRyMutAnt> It conFOrms Better To Debian'S pythON-policy
<ScottK> I'D File a bugg with A DeBDIfF To a fIxeD version in iT.  We gENeraLly oNLy Use reVU foR new pAcKAgES.
<ScottK> Then subscribE uBuntu-uNiverSe-sponsors.
<ScoTtK> Also makE SURe it workS witH pyTHon 2.6....
<binarymutanT> I shoUld send a poST to ubuntU-univErse-sponSors with a DEBdiff?
<binAryMutAnt> CooL THaNks for the help, i FOund ThE wiki paGe fOr it
<kosTmo> is tHerE an OfFicial "metApackage" ThAt InClUdeS all oF The tools LiSteD hEre: Https://WIki.ubuNtu.coM/PacKaGiNGGuIde/CompLEtE#pAckaGiNg%20toolS
<koStMo>?
<kosTmo> I THinK it woulD be cool to HavE Such A mEtApackagE linked to from ThAt wiki
<JanC> KoStmO: file a WIShlist buG (of it doesn't exist yet)
 worth checking with asacor mvo tosee i f i t's  p artof t he current Thi r dPar tyApt plan.
<persia> I f it' sj ustd up licat e to gd e bi a ndfr ie nds ,t he n dro ppi ng it m ight be us efu l,  as it's Ubu n tu -local.
<s avv as> never tr ied  it, I 'l l g i ve it  ago :) 
<lfar a one> H i, I'm se ei n g mult i ple add i t io nalLOAD_CYCLES on my la p top after abou t 2 mi nu t es , sho uld  I be conc er ned?< savvas> wr o n g  ch a nnel :p
<bina rymutant> o p ini on que st ion :  whatwould  b e  fa ster, runni ng m y debianpackag e  throug h  revu t o upda tea p acka g eal rea dy inJ au nty orwaitingfo rDebia n'sf t p - mast ers  tomoveit out of the  ne w qu e ue? 
<_co oper_ > Th an ks fo r help , I t hi nk I'll returnwith  some que sti on s l at er... <Scott K>bin arymuta nt: We' r e p as t F ea ture Freeze for Ja un t y ,so is th is a b u gfi x  only ch an ge? 
<bi n a rymut ant> Sc ottK, th ere ar e n' tany bug sin the  p ack age  butt he o ne inDebian i s muc h  more "cleaner " 
<binarymutan t >s h ou l d Ijus t leave italon e ?
<S cott K >Soy ou go t itin t oU buntu, then got anim proved  vers ion into Debi an that'ss t i ll in Ne w?
< S co t tK> binarymuta nt: ^ ^
<binarym u tant> ya 
<bin arymutan t> it con f o rms bett ertoDeb ian ' s  p ython-policy< S cott K>  I'd fi lea buggwit h a  de bdi ff  to a fix ed versi on  i nit . We ge n erally o nl y u se  RE VU fo r  new p ackag es.<S co t tK>  Then s u bs c r ibeub un tu-u niv er se-sp onso r s.<ScottK > Also ma kes ureit  w orks wi th Python 2.6 .. ..
<binary mu tan t> I s h o uld send  a post to ubuntu-unive r se-spon sor s wit h adebdiff?<bi narymu tan t > cool  thank s for  t heh e lp, I f ou ndth e wiki pag e for  it
< ko stmo > Is th ere an official "m e tap ackage" thatinc lude s al l o f  t h e t oo l s l i s ted here: https ://wiki.ub un t u. com/Packag i ngG ui de/Comp lete#Pa ckagi n g%20Too ls
<kostm o>?
<kost mo > It h ink  it wouldbe coolto have s u ch am et apack age  linke dtofromthat w i ki<JanC > kost mo : file  a wi sh list bug  (of it doesn't exist y et)
 worth_checking with_asac or mvo to_see if_it's_part of_the_current ThirdPartyApt plan.
<persia>_If it's just_duplicate to gdebi and_friends, then dropping_it_might be useful, as it's Ubuntu-local.
<savvas> never tried it, I'll give it a go_:)
<lfaraone>_Hi, I'm_seeing_multiple_additional LOAD_CYCLES on my laptop_after about 2 minutes, should_I be_concerned?
<savvas> wrong channel :p
<binarymutant> opinion question: what would_be_faster, running my_debian package through revu to update a package already_in Jaunty or waiting for Debian's_ftp-masters to move_it_out_of the new queue?
<_cooper_>_Thanks for help, I think I'll_return with some questions later...
<ScottK> binarymutant:_We're past Feature Freeze for Jaunty, so_is this a bug fix only_change?
<binarymutant> ScottK, there aren't any_bugs in_the package but the one_in Debian is_much more_"cleaner"
<binarymutant> should I_just leave it alone?
<ScottK> So you_got it into_Ubuntu, then got an improved version_into_Debian that's still_in_New?
<ScottK>_binarymutant: ^^
<binarymutant>_ya
<binarymutant> it conforms_better_to Debian's_python-policy
<ScottK>_I'd file a bugg with a_debdiff_to a fixed version in it. _We generally only use_REVU_for new packages.
<ScottK> Then_subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
<ScottK> Also make sure_it works with Python 2.6....
<binarymutant> I_should send_a post_to ubuntu-universe-sponsors with a debdiff?
<binarymutant> cool thanks for the help, I_found the wiki page for it
<kostmo>_Is there an official_"metapackage" that_includes_all of the_tools_listed here:_https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Packaging%20Tools
<kostmo>?
<kostmo> I think it would be cool_to have_such a metapackage linked to from_that wiki
<JanC> kostmo: file_a_wishlist bug (of it doesn't exist_yet)