 the debian.dsc as a comment
<cjwatson> all that does is create extra work for somebody who has to check that it is the same
<Laney> give a link to the debian dsc
<cjwatson> goshawk: what changes were necessary for Ubuntu?
<Laney> I guess that would be ok
<goshawk> cjwatson: just the changelog that fixes the LP bug, and the Maintainer field
<goshawk> nothing more
<goshawk> i did both
<cjwatson> goshawk: no, don't do that
<cjwatson> if that's all, we should just sync the Debian package
<cjwatson> there is no need to create a delta for just that
<goshawk> cjwatson: ok so i'm adding a comment saying to just sync with debian one :)
<cjwatson> (the above comments do not constitute a freeze exception... I haven't looked at it)
<goshawk> of course :)
<goshawk> done
<nhandler> goshawk: Just to clarify, this libconfig is in no way related to the old libconifg that was previously in Ubuntu and Debian, it is a different application that just shares the same name, correct?
<goshawk> it seems so for me
<goshawk> cuz also the pk provided are different
<goshawk> sites are different
<goshawk> i mean websites
<nhandler> Ok, I just wanted to make sure I understood the wnpp bug correct
<goshawk> versions are different too
<nhandler> cjwatson: Would we need to do anything special on our end to handle the package?
<porthose> would a kind member of MOTU-release please unsubscribe MOTU-release from Bug #338408, as the upstream maintainer is updating the package :)
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 338408 in coherence "FFe for python-coherence" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/338408
 * nhandler goes to look
<adelie42> Hello, I am a long time hobby programmer, but new to this collaborative environment. I just spent today fixing some bugs, but I think I "did it wrong". I used 'apt-get source' to get the package, but now it looks like I should have gotten
the debian.dsc as a comment 
 < cjwatson > all that does is create extra workplace for somebody who have to check that it is the same 
 < Laney > give a connection to the debian dsc 
 < cjwatson > goshawk: what changes were necessary for Ubuntu? 
 < Laney > I guess that would be all right 
 < goshawk > cjwatson: just the changelog that fixes the LP bug, and the Maintainer battlefield 
 < goshawk > nothing more 
 < goshawk > i did both 
 < cjwatson > goshawk: no, don't do that 
 < cjwatson > if that's all, we should just synchronize the Debian package 
 < cjwatson > there is no need to create a delta for barely that 
 < goshawk > cjwatson: ok so i'm adding a comment saying to just synchronize with debian one :) 
 < cjwatson > (the above comments do not constitute a freeze exception... I haven't looked at it) 
 < goshawk > of class :) 
 < goshawk > done 
 < nhandler > goshawk: Just to clarify, this libconfig is in no way relate to the old libconifg that was previously in Ubuntu and Debian, it is a unlike application that precisely shares the same name, correct? 
 < goshawk > it appear so for me 
 < goshawk > cuz also the pk provided are different 
 < goshawk > sites are unlike 
 < goshawk > i entail websites 
 < nhandler > Ok, I just wanted to make sure I understood the wnpp bug correct 
 < goshawk > versions are different too 
 < nhandler > cjwatson: Would we necessitate to do anything special on our conclusion to cover the package? 
 < porthose > would a kind member of MOTU - release please unsubscribe MOTU - handout from hemipterous insect # 338408, as the upstream maintainer is updating the software :) 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 338408 in coherence " FFe for python - coherence " [ Undecided, Incomplete ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/338408 
  * nhandler goes to look 
 < adelie42 > Hello, I am a long time hobby programmer, but new to this collaborative environment. I just spent today fixing some bugs, but I think I " serve it faulty ". I used' apt - get source' to get the package, but nowadays it looks like I should have gotten
 thf debian.dsc as a comment
<gjwatson> all thaj eoes iv creafe extra work for somebody who has tl xheck that it is the same
<Lavey> give w link ti tht debian dsc
<cjwatson> goshawk: whzb chaugxs were necessaty for Ubuntg?
<Laney> I guess tfac would be ok
<goshawk> cjwatson: just tre chanbepog that fixes the JP bhg, and the Maintainer field
<goshawk> nothinj more
<goshawk> i did both
<cjwatson> goshawk: jo, dln't do that
<cjwatsoj> if that's qll, rw should jusg sync the Debian packzge
<cjwatson> there is no need to creace a delta doe jkvt that
<goshewk> cjratson: ok so i'm additg a cokment saying tp jnst wync with debian one :)
<rjwatson> (the above cjmments dm uot constitute a freeze excektion... I hxcen'g lkoles at ih)
<goahawk> of ckurse :)
<goshaqk> done
<nhandler> gosnarj: Just to cladify, trif libconfig is in no way related to the ols libconifg that was prwviously in Ubuntu anf Debian, yt is a different application that just shares tha samx vamt, gjfeeft?
<goshawk> it seems so for me
<goshawk> cuz also ege pl provided are different
<gpsjaeh> sites are dkffereuf
<gkshawk> i mean websltes
<nhagdler> Ok, I jusu wanyed to make sure I understoid the wnpp yug correct
<goshawk> vexsions are dnfferemt top
<nhandler> cjwatson: Woulb we nsed to do ajything sldcial on our end to hdndle tht package?
<porthose> rould a kmnd mzmber of MOTO-releasq please ujsubsgsibe MOTU-release fgom Bog #338408, as the upstrfam maintainer is updating the 'eckage :)
<ubottu> Ldunbhpad bug 338408 in goherence "FFe fjr python-cohergnce" [Undeeided,Ivcomplete] gttps://lannchpad.net/buds/338408
 * nhandler cles to look
<avelie42> Heljo, I am q long gkme hobby progtammer, bun uew to thus collaborative ekvirovjent. I just speuu tiday fixing somr bjgs, blt M thign I "did it wsong". I jxed 'aot-get sourcc' tu gey the package, but nof it looks like I shoukd have gojten
the debian.dsc as a comment <cjwatson> all is extra work somebody who has the <Laney> give a to the debian <cjwatson> goshawk: what changes were necessary Ubuntu? <Laney> I guess that would be ok <goshawk> cjwatson: just the changelog fixes the LP bug, and the Maintainer field <goshawk> nothing more <goshawk> i both goshawk: don't that <cjwatson> if that's all, we should just sync the Debian package <cjwatson> there is no to create a delta for just that <goshawk> ok so i'm adding comment saying to just sync debian :) <cjwatson> above do constitute a freeze I haven't looked at it) <goshawk> of course :) <goshawk> done <nhandler> goshawk: Just to clarify, this is in related to old that previously in Ubuntu it is a different application that same name, correct? <goshawk> it seems so for <goshawk> cuz the pk provided are different <goshawk> are different <goshawk> i mean websites <nhandler> Ok, just wanted to make sure I understood the wnpp bug correct <goshawk> versions are different cjwatson: Would we need do anything special our to the <porthose> would kind member of MOTU-release please unsubscribe MOTU-release from Bug #338408, as upstream maintainer is updating the package :) <ubottu> Launchpad bug coherence for python-coherence" [Undecided,Incomplete] * nhandler goes to <adelie42> I am a long programmer, new environment. just today fixing some bugs, I think I "did it I used 'apt-get source' now it looks like I should have gotten
 the debian.dsc as a comment
<cjwAtson> all thAt doeS is CreAtE extRa woRk for somebody wHO has To check that it is the same
<laney> GiVE a liNK tO the dEbian dsC
<CjWATsoN> gOsHawK: wHAt ChangEs wEre neceSsary for UbUntU?
<LAney> I guess thAT wOuld be ok
<goShaWk> cjwatson: juSt tHe chanGeLog THat fiXes The LP Bug, and THe MainTainer fieLd
<GOshawk> NOthing mORE
<gOshaWk> i did both
<cjwatsoN> GoSHawk: no, don't do thAt
<cjwaTsON> iF THat'S alL, we should jUsT sync THe DebiaN PaCKAGe
<cJWatson> there is No need to creATe a Delta fOr JusT That
<goShawk> CjWAtsOn: ok so i'm addIng a Comment saYing to JUst sync WIth debiAn one :)
<cJwaTsoN> (the ABoVe ComMeNTs dO NoT coNStiTute a freEzE eXceptIon... I HAVEN't loOkeD at iT)
<goshAwk> of course :)
<goShaWk> doNE
<nhAndleR> goshAwk: JUsT to clArify, tHis liBcOnfig is in no way rElatEd to the olD liBcOniFg That wAS previOusLy iN Ubuntu And DebiAN, it Is A DIFfErent application thAt JUSt Shares thE same nAMe, CoRRect?
<goshAwK> it SeemS SO for mE
<gosHAwK> cuz also The pk pROvIdEd are diFfErent
<gOsHawK> siTes arE DiffErent
<gOshawk> i mEan weBSites
<nhandler> OK, i just wanted to MAkE SUrE i undErsTood the wnpp Bug cORrecT
<gosHAwK> veRSions Are diFfEReNT too
<nhandler> cjwatsoN: WOuld we Need tO do anything spEcial on our END To handle The pACkAGe?
<porthose> woulD a kinD member of MotU-releasE pleaSe unsubsCribe MOTU-RELease froM BuG #338408, as The UpsTREaM maintainer is UPDatiNg The packAge :)
<Ubottu> LAunChpAd bUg 338408 iN cOherence "Ffe for pytHoN-cOhErEncE" [UndeCIded,IncoMpLetE] hTtpS://launCHpad.neT/bugs/338408
 * NhanDlEr GOes To look
<aDElIE42> hellO, I Am A lonG tiMe Hobby ProgRAmmEr, but neW to this coLlaBOratIvE eNvironmEnt. I just spent ToDay fixing sOmE buGs, but I THInk I "did iT wrong". I used 'apt-get source' TO get the PacKage, bUt noW it looks lIke i shoulD haVE gotteN
 the debian.dsc as a comme nt
<cjwats on> a lltha tdoes  iscreate extra w o rk f or somebody who has to  chec kt hati tis th e same< La n e y>gi ve  ali n kto th e d ebian d sc
<cjwats on>  g oshawk: what ch anges were  ne cessary forUbu ntu?
< La ney >  I gu ess  that  would be ok<goshawk>  c j watson :  just t h e  c hang elog that fixes t h eL P bug, and the  Maint ai n er f iel d
< goshawk> n ot hingm ore
<go s ha w k >  id id both
<cjwa tson> gosha w k:no, do n' t d o  that<cjwa ts o n>if that's a ll,we should  justs ync the Debianpackag e
< cjw atso n >th ere  i s  no ne edt o c reate ade lt a for  jus t t h at
< gos hawk > cjw atson: ok soi'm  add i nga com mentsayi ng  to j ust sy nc wi th  debian one :)<cjw atson> (t heab ove  c ommen t s do n otcon stitute  a free z e e xc e p t io n... I haven't loo ke d at  it)
<go shawk> of  c o urse :)<g osh awk> d one
< nhan d le r> gosha wk: Ju s tto  clarif y,  thisli bco nfi g isi n no  way r elated t o the old libconifgt hat was previ o us l y  i n  Ubu ntu  and Debian , it is a  dif f er ent appli catio nt ha t  just shares the sa me  name,  corr ect?
<goshawk > it seems s o  for me<gos h aw k > cuz also the  pk p rovided ar e  differe nt
<g oshawk>sites are d ifferent 
<g osh awk > i m ea n websites
<n h a ndle r>  Ok, Ijus t wante d t o m ake  su re  I unders tood the  w np pbu g c orrec t 
<goshaw k>  ve rs ion s are differ ent t oo
< nh an d ler > cjwat s on : Woul dwe  nee d t odo an ythi n g s pecialon our en d t o  han dl ethe pac kage?
<portho se > would aki ndmember o f MOTU-r elease please unsubscri b e MOTU- rel easefrom  Bug #338 408 , as t heu pstrea m main taine risu p datin g th e p ac kage :)
<u b o ttu > Lau nc hpad  bug 33 8408 in coherence" FFe  for python-c ohe renc e "  [ Und e ci d ed, In c omp l e te] https://lau nchpad.net /b u gs /338408
 * nha nd ler goe s to lo ok
<a d elie42>  Hello, I  am a lon gtime h obb y programm er, butnew to th i s col l ab orati veenviro nm ent . I j ust sp e nttoday  fixin gsome b ugs,bu t I thin k I "did it wrong". I u sed 'a pt-ge t s ource' to  ge t  th e package , bu t now it l ook s l ike I  sh o uld h aveg ot ten 
 the_debian.dsc as_a comment
<cjwatson> all that_does is_create_extra work_for_somebody who has_to check that_it is the same
<Laney>_give a link_to_the debian dsc
<cjwatson> goshawk: what changes were necessary for Ubuntu?
<Laney> I guess that would_be_ok
<goshawk> cjwatson:_just_the_changelog that fixes the LP_bug, and the Maintainer field
<goshawk>_nothing more
<goshawk>_i did both
<cjwatson> goshawk: no, don't do that
<cjwatson>_if_that's all, we_should just sync the Debian package
<cjwatson> there is no_need to create a delta for_just that
<goshawk> cjwatson:_ok_so_i'm adding a comment_saying to just sync with debian_one :)
<cjwatson> (the above comments do_not constitute a freeze exception... I haven't_looked at it)
<goshawk> of course :)
<goshawk>_done
<nhandler> goshawk: Just to clarify,_this libconfig_is in no way related_to the old_libconifg that_was previously in_Ubuntu and Debian, it is a_different application that_just shares the same name, correct?
<goshawk>_it_seems so for_me
<goshawk>_cuz_also the_pk provided are_different
<goshawk>_sites are_different
<goshawk>_i mean websites
<nhandler> Ok, I just_wanted_to make sure I understood the wnpp_bug correct
<goshawk> versions are_different_too
<nhandler> cjwatson: Would we_need to do anything special_on our end to handle the_package?
<porthose> would_a kind_member of MOTU-release please unsubscribe MOTU-release from Bug #338408, as the_upstream maintainer is updating the package_:)
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 338408_in coherence_"FFe_for python-coherence" [Undecided,Incomplete]_https://launchpad.net/bugs/338408
_* nhandler_goes to look
<adelie42> Hello, I am a_long time_hobby programmer, but new to this_collaborative environment. I just_spent_today fixing some bugs, but I_think I "did it wrong". I_used 'apt-get source' to get_the_package,_but now it looks like_I should have gotten