 the detriment of my health to get this ready =)
<ESphynx> but yeah, the main new 'feature' is 64 bit support... that is really a bug fix if you think about it, but it required fixing the whole SDK including the compiler to support it :)
<ScottK> Feature includes major invasive changes, so it counts.
<ScottK> xnox: If you sponsor in Debian, I'll approve the FFe.
<ESphynx> sounds like a deal :) many thanks to both of you ;)
<xnox> ScottK: ok. but i do need to read the diff & build it for debian & test, it's not a quick to review & sponsor package =))))
<ESphynx> xnox: a milestone ahead is 'haste' which will focus on speeding up the compiler, hopefully we'll go from 23 minute build to less :P
<ScottK> xnox: I have not given it a review.  If you sponsor, you're responsible (as usual in Debian).
<ESphynx> xnox: Sorry to have landed on you :(
<ESphynx> xnox: I missed 2 lintian warnings overrides, sorry
<xnox> not your fault, I do end up sucked into weird packages all the time. I guess it's karma =)
<dholbach> good morning
<freeflying> are we still using revu for package review/sponsorship seeking?
<freeflying> or there is similar website
<tumbleweed> there's also mentors.debian.net (and we prefer new packages to be added to Debian, not Ubuntu)
<tumbleweed> and for changes to packages already in the archive, just stick a debdiff in a LP bug
<freeflying> tumbleweed: what about a new upstream release in Ubuntu
<tumbleweed> freeflying: debdiff restricted to the debian directory?
<tumbleweed> or a bzr merge proposal
<freeflying> tumbleweed: not restricted to debian dir
<tumbleweed> freeflying:?
<freeflying> tumbleweed: like upstream has a new release, and maintainer has it packaged, which is the best workflow for him to seek for sponsoring upload
<tumbleweed> I suggested two: a debdiff filtered on /debian/ or a
the detriment of my health to get this ready =) 
 < ESphynx > but yeah, the main new' feature of speech' is 64 piece support... that is really a hemipterous insect localization if you think about it, but it required fix the hale SDK including the compiler to support it :) 
 < ScottK > Feature includes major encroaching changes, so it counts. 
 < ScottK > xnox: If you patronize in Debian, I'll approve the FFe. 
 < ESphynx > sounds like a deal :) many thanks to both of you ;) 
 < xnox > ScottK: ok. but i do need to read the diff & build it for debian & test, it's not a quick to review & patronize package =)) )) 
 < ESphynx > xnox: a milestone ahead is' haste' which will focus on accelerate up the compiler, hopefully we'll go from 23 minute physique to less :P 
 < ScottK > xnox: I have not given it a reappraisal.   If you sponsor, you're responsible (as usual in Debian). 
 < ESphynx > xnox: Sorry to have landed on you :( 
 < ESphynx > xnox: I miss 2 lintian warnings overrides, sorry 
 < xnox > not your fault, I do end up sucked into eldritch package all the time. I guess it's karma =) 
 < dholbach > good morning 
 < freeflying > are we still using revu for package review / sponsorship seeking? 
 < freeflying > or there embody similar website 
 < tumbleweed > there's besides mentors.debian.net (and we choose new packages to be added to Debian, not Ubuntu) 
 < tumbleweed > and for changes to software already in the archive, just stick a debdiff in a LP bug 
 < freeflying > tumbleweed: what about a new upstream spill in Ubuntu 
 < tumbleweed > freeflying: debdiff restricted to the debian directory? 
 < tumbleweed > or a bzr merge proposal 
 < freeflying > tumbleweed: not restricted to debian dir 
 < tumbleweed > freeflying: ? 
 < freeflying > tumbleweed: like upstream has a new spill, and maintainer has it packaged, which is the best workflow for him to search for sponsoring upload 
 < tumbleweed > I suggest two: a debdiff filtered on /debian/ or a
 thf detriment of my health to get this recey =)
<ESpiynx> buf yeah, tfe main new 'feature' is 64 bit dupport... that is really a bug wix if yol think avout ut, but it csquired fixinf the xhole SDK inclucing the cmmpiler to sup[oft it :)
<ScottK> Feature includes major igvasive cjanges, so it cjuntx.
<FcotfK> xnox: If you sponsor in Debian, I'ml apprmve the FFe.
<ESlhynx> sounds like a deal :) lany thanks to both of you ;)
<xnox> SxottH: ok. but i do need to rtab the diff & build it for debian & test, it's vot a quick to tzciea & sponsor peckage =))))
<ESphynx> xnow: a milastone shead is 'haste' whmch qill focus on speedinj up the compiler, hokefully we'nl go from 23 minute vuuld tm levs :P
<RxotgK> snpx: I havf nkt given if a review.  If you sponsor, you'te grsponsible (aa usuaj yn Debian).
<ESphynx> xnox: Sorry to have langed on you :(
<ESphynx> xnox: I nissed 2 lintian warnijgs overrydes, sorry
<xnox> not your fault, I do end up sucked hnto xekrd pwzjahes all the time. I guess it's karma =)
<dholbach> gjkd mprning
<freeflyikg> are we still usonh tgvu for packagg reviec/apknsorship seeking?
<fgeeflyigg> or there is simolar website
<tumbleweed> therw's also mentjes.debian.net (and we prefer new paclages to be added to Debian, uot Ubhntu)
<tumblewfed> and fkf changes to pacyagvs anready in the archive, just stick a vebdiyf in a UP bog
<freefjying> tumbpeweed: what about a new kpstrgam renease in Uhuntu
<tumbleweed> freeflying: debdmhf restricted tm tve debiau diregtory?
<tumbleweed> or a bzr mergg proposaj
<freewlying> tumgleweed: not restristed to debiat dir
<tumblewexd> freeflring:?
<dreedlying> gjmbleweed: like upstream has a new release, and mainteinet gas it packaged, whuch is the best wofkfjoa hor hyk to seek fos spunsuting jpload
<tumblcwedd> I suggested two: a debgiff filtered on /debiam/ jr a
the detriment of my health to get =) but yeah, main new 'feature' is a bug fix you think about but it required fixing the whole including the compiler to support it :) <ScottK> Feature includes major invasive changes, it counts. <ScottK> xnox: If you sponsor in Debian, I'll approve the FFe. sounds a :) thanks to both of you ;) <xnox> ScottK: ok. but i do need to read the & build it for debian & test, it's a quick to review sponsor package =)))) <ESphynx> xnox: milestone is 'haste' will on up the compiler, we'll go from 23 minute build to less :P <ScottK> xnox: I have not given it a If you responsible (as in <ESphynx> Sorry to have you :( <ESphynx> xnox: I missed overrides, sorry <xnox> not your fault, I do up sucked weird packages all the time. I it's karma =) <dholbach> good morning <freeflying> are still using revu for package review/sponsorship seeking? <freeflying> or there is similar website <tumbleweed> there's (and we prefer new to be added Debian, Ubuntu) and changes to already in the archive, just stick a debdiff in a LP <freeflying> tumbleweed: what about a new upstream release in Ubuntu debdiff to the debian <tumbleweed> or a bzr proposal tumbleweed: not restricted to <tumbleweed> <freeflying> has new and maintainer has it which is the best workflow him to seek for two: a debdiff filtered on /debian/ or a
 the detriment of my health to gEt this readY =)
<ESphYnx> But YeAh, thE maiN new 'feature' is 64 bIT supPort... that is really a bug fiX if yoU tHInk aBOuT it, buT it requIReD FIxiNg ThE whOlE sDk inclUdiNg the coMpiler to suPpoRt It :)
<ScottK> FeatURe Includes maJor Invasive chanGes, So it coUnTs.
<SCOttK> xNox: if you SponsoR In DebiAn, I'll apprOvE The FFe.
<esphynx> sOUNdS likE a deal :) many thanks tO BoTH of you ;)
<xnox> ScotTK: ok. buT i DO nEED to ReaD the diff & buIlD it foR Debian & tESt, IT'S Not A Quick to review & Sponsor packAGe =))))
<Esphynx> XnOx: a MIlestoNe aheAd IS 'haSte' which wilL focUs on speedIng up tHE compilER, hopefuLly we'lL go FroM 23 minUTe BuIld To LEss :p
<scOttk> XnoX: I have noT gIvEn it a ReviEW.  iF You sPonSor, yOu're rEsponsible (as uSuaL in DEBiaN).
<ESphYnx> xnOx: SoRrY to haVe landEd on yOu :(
<eSphynx> xnox: I misSed 2 lIntian warNinGs OveRrIdes, sORry
<xnoX> noT yoUr fault, i do end uP SucKeD INTo Weird packages all thE tIME. I Guess it's Karma =)
<dHOlBaCH> good morNiNg
<fReefLYIng> arE we sTIlL using reVu for pACkAgE review/SpOnsorsHiP seEkiNg?
<freEFlyiNg> or thEre is simIlar wEBsite
<tumbleweeD> There's also menTOrS.DEbIAn.neT (anD we prefer neW pacKAges To be ADdEd tO debiaN, not UBuNTu)
<TUmbleweed> and for chanGeS to pacKages Already in the aRchive, just STICk a debdiFf in A lP BUg
<freeflying> tuMblewEed: what aboUT a new upsTream Release iN Ubuntu
<tuMBLeweed> frEefLyiNg: dEbdIFF rEstricted to thE DEbiaN dIrectorY?
<tuMbleweeD> or A bzR meRge PrOposal
<freEflying> tUmBlEwEeD: noT restRIcted to dEbIan DiR
<tuMblewEEd> freeFlyinG:?
<freEfLyINg> tUmbleweED: lIKE upsTrEaM has A neW rEleasE, and MAinTainer hAs it packaGed, WHich Is ThE best woRkflow for him tO sEek for sponSoRinG uploaD
<TUmbleweeD> I suggested two: a debdiff fILtered oN /deBian/ oR a
 the detriment of my healt h to get t his r ead y = )<ESp hynx > but yeah, th e  mai n new 'feature' is 64bit s up p ort. . .thatis real l ya bug  f ix  if  y o uthink  ab out it,  but it re qui re d fixing the wh ole SDK in clu ding the com pil er tosu ppo r t it:)<Scot tK> Fe a ture i ncludes m aj o r inva s ive cha n g es , so  it counts.
<Scot t K> xnox: If you s ponsor  i n  D e b ian , I 'll approv ethe F F e.
<ESp h yn x > sou n ds like a dea l :) many t h ank s to b ot h o f  you ; )
<xn ox >  Sc ottK: ok. b ut i  do needto rea d  the di f f & bui ld itfor  de bian &te st,  i t 'sn ot  aq uic k to rev ie w& spo nsor p a c kage  =) )))<ESph ynx> xnox: amil esto n e a headis 'h aste 'which  willfocus  o n speeding up t he c ompiler,hop ef ull ywe'll go fro m 2 3 m inute b uild to les s: P <S cottK> xnox: I hav en o tgiven it  a rev i ew .If you s po nso r, y o u 're r espo n si ble (asusuali nDe bian).<E Sphynx >xno x:Sorry to h ave la nded onyou : ( 
<ESphynx> xno x : I missed 2l in t i an warn ing s overrides , so r ry
< xnox >  n oty our f ault,  I do end up sucked intowe ird pa ckage s all the tim e. I guess i t 's karma  =)< dh o lbach> good mo rning 
<freeflyi n g> are w e sti ll using  revu for p ackage r evi ew/ spo nso r s hi p seeking?
<f r e efly in g> or t her e is si mil arweb sit e<tumblewe ed> ther e' sal so  me ntors . debian.n et  (a nd  we  pref e r newpacka gesto  b e  ad ded toD eb i a n, n ot  U bunt u)<t umble weed >  an d for c hanges to  pa c kage sal ready i n the archive ,just stick  a  de bdiffi n  a LP bu g
<freeflying> tumblewe e d: what  ab out a  new  upstream  re leaseinU buntu<tumbl eweed >fre e f lying : de bdi ff  restricte d tothe d eb iandirecto ry?
<tumbleweed> o r  abzr merge pro pos al
< f r ee fly i ng >  tu mb l ewe e d : not restricte d to debia nd ir 
<tumblewe e d>fr eeflyin g:?
<fr eefly i ng> tum bleweed:like upst re am h a s  anew releas e, and m aintainer has i t  p ackag ed,  which  i s t he be st wor k flo w for  him t oseek f or sp on soring u pload
<tumbleweed> I su ggeste d two : a  debdifffil t ere d on /deb ian/  or a
 the_detriment of_my health to get_this ready_=)
<ESphynx>_but yeah,_the_main new 'feature'_is 64 bit_support... that is really_a bug fix_if_you think about it, but it required fixing the whole SDK including the compiler_to_support it_:)
<ScottK>_Feature_includes major invasive changes, so_it counts.
<ScottK> xnox: If you_sponsor in_Debian, I'll approve the FFe.
<ESphynx> sounds like a_deal_:) many thanks_to both of you ;)
<xnox> ScottK: ok. but i_do need to read the diff_& build it_for_debian_& test, it's not_a quick to review & sponsor_package =))))
<ESphynx> xnox: a milestone ahead_is 'haste' which will focus on speeding_up the compiler, hopefully we'll go_from 23 minute build to_less :P
<ScottK>_xnox: I have not given_it a review._ If_you sponsor, you're_responsible (as usual in Debian).
<ESphynx> xnox:_Sorry to have_landed on you :(
<ESphynx> xnox: I_missed_2 lintian warnings_overrides,_sorry
<xnox>_not your_fault, I do_end_up sucked_into_weird packages all the time. I_guess_it's karma =)
<dholbach> good morning
<freeflying> are we_still using revu for_package_review/sponsorship seeking?
<freeflying> or there_is similar website
<tumbleweed> there's also_mentors.debian.net (and we prefer new packages_to be_added to_Debian, not Ubuntu)
<tumbleweed> and for changes to packages already in the_archive, just stick a debdiff in_a LP bug
<freeflying> tumbleweed:_what about_a_new upstream release_in_Ubuntu
<tumbleweed> freeflying:_debdiff restricted to the debian directory?
<tumbleweed> or_a bzr_merge proposal
<freeflying> tumbleweed: not restricted to_debian dir
<tumbleweed> freeflying:?
<freeflying> tumbleweed:_like_upstream has a new release, and_maintainer has it packaged, which is_the best workflow for him_to_seek_for sponsoring upload
<tumbleweed> I suggested_two: a debdiff filtered on /debian/_or a