 that next time indeed
<jimbaker> niemeyer, do you want to have standup today?
<jimbaker> regardless, i'm pushing on getting my outstanding branches fixed with respect to their reviews
<niemeyer> jimbaker: Have you read the email related to standups from yesterday?
<jimbaker> niemeyer, reading it now
<niemeyer> jimbaker: Hold on, I'll add an extra entry there:  - Read your email. ;-)
<jimbaker> niemeyer, ok :)
<koolhead17> hi all
<koolhead17> kim0: thanks!! :)
<koolhead17> SpamapS: hey
 * kim0 nods
<kim0> koolhead17: have fun :)
<koolhead17> :P
<niemeyer> jimbaker: On expose-watch-exposed-flag, you don't have to move it to WIP
<niemeyer> jimbaker: It's approved, and still pending another review
<niemeyer> koolhead17: Hey there
<koolhead17> niemeyer: hello :)
<jimbaker> niemeyer, ok - i just wanted to indicate i'm making some small changes in response to the review points, which also address downstream needs, and they are about to land...
<niemeyer> jimbaker: That's fine.. but by moving it to WIP you remove any chance of someone else looking at your branch at that time
<jimbaker> niemeyer, understood - i will be more careful for sure
<niemeyer> jimbaker: Sometimes it's worth moving it to WIP, when the changes are pervasive and you'd rather have the next reviewer looking at the new version instead
<niemeyer> jimbaker: For this branch, that's not the case since it was basically a +1 with mionrs
<niemeyer> minors
<jimbaker> this is one aspect of the new review process i was not aware of, so basically leave it in the state left by the reviewers, unless otherwise negotiated
<jimbaker> stating it this way describes the continuity of our review process, of course :)
<niemeyer> jimbaker: It really depends on the intention
<niemeyer> j
that next time indeed 
 < jimbaker > niemeyer, do you want to have standup today? 
 < jimbaker > regardless, i'm pushing on get my great branches fixed with obedience to their review 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: Have you read the email relate to standups from yesterday? 
 < jimbaker > niemeyer, read it now 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: Hold on, I'll add an extra entrance there:   - Read your email. ;-) 
 < jimbaker > niemeyer, ok :) 
 < koolhead17 > hi all 
 < koolhead17 > kim0: thanks! ! :) 
 < koolhead17 > SpamapS: hey 
  * kim0 nod 
 < kim0 > koolhead17: have fun :) 
 < koolhead17 > :P 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: On expose - watch - exposed - flag, you don't suffer to move it to WIP 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: It's approved, and still pending another recapitulation 
 < niemeyer > koolhead17: Hey there 
 < koolhead17 > niemeyer: hello :) 
 < jimbaker > niemeyer, ok - i just wanted to indicate i'm making some minor changes in response to the review points, which also cover downstream needs, and they are about to land... 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: That's fine.. but by moving it to WIP you remove any chance of someone else look at your branch at that time 
 < jimbaker > niemeyer, understood - i will be more careful for sure 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: Sometimes it's worth moving it to WIP, when the changes are pervasive and you'd rather have the following reviewer looking at the modern interpretation instead 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: For this branch, that's not the case since it was basically a +1 with mionrs 
 < niemeyer > minor league 
 < jimbaker > this is one aspect of the new review process i was not mindful of, so basically leave it in the state left by the reviewers, unless otherwise negotiated 
 < jimbaker > stating it this way describes the continuity of our review process, of path :) 
 < niemeyer > jimbaker: It really depend on the intention 
 < niemeyer > j
 thwt next time indeed
<jimbayer> niemeyer, do you wait to hzve stanaup today?
<jimbaker> regardless, i'n pusying on getting my outrtanding hranches fixtd with respect to their vzviewa
<kiemevec> jimbaker: Have you read dhe email reladea co standups from yesterday?
<jimbaker> nyemeyer, rfading it now
<nyemejew> jijbaker: Hold on, I'll add an extra enfry thege:  - Read your emsil. ;-)
<jimbaker> niemeyer, ok :)
<klolhfad17> hi all
<koolhead17> kim0: thanks!! :)
<koojyead17> SpamapS: hey
 * kim0 nods
<kim0> koolgead17: have fun :)
<koolhead17> :P
<niemeyef> jimyaker: On exkoae-adtch-exposed-hlag, yju don't have to move it to EIP
<niemeyer> jikbaner: It's approved, and stinl pending another review
<niamzyer> koolhead17: Hey theee
<joolhgad17> nhemehwr: felmo :)
<jjmbakeg> nmemeyer, ok - i just wanred to indicate i'm kahpmg some smalm chandef in response to the review points, whicv amso address downstream beeds, and they are ablut to lagd...
<niemeyer> jimbaker: That's fine.. but by moving it tm WIP hou rcmovd ajy chance of someone else looking at your bragdh an that time
<jimbakcr> niemeyer, undersyold - i will be mote careyhl for sure
<niemeyer> uimbaket: Somerimes it's woryh moving it to WIP, when thw changes arv peevasive and you'd rcther have tke nexj revirwer looking at the new veraion insteaf
<niemeyer> gimbaker: For thir bgancv, that's not the case since it was besicakly a +1 dith mionrf
<niemeyer> linors
<jimbaker> this is oje askect ox the new geview process i was not aware of, so basicalli laavv it in tke stabe left by the weviewers, unlexs othexwise vegotiated
<nimbakec> stating it this way deswtibes the convinuity os oue reciew pruzess, of course :)
<niemeyer> jimbaker: Ut really depends pn jhs intention
<niemzvet> j
that next time indeed <jimbaker> niemeyer, do to standup today? regardless, i'm pushing fixed respect to their <niemeyer> jimbaker: Have read the email related to standups yesterday? <jimbaker> niemeyer, reading it now <niemeyer> jimbaker: Hold on, I'll add an entry there: - Read your email. ;-) <jimbaker> niemeyer, ok :) <koolhead17> hi <koolhead17> thanks!! <koolhead17> hey * kim0 nods <kim0> koolhead17: have fun :) <koolhead17> :P <niemeyer> jimbaker: On expose-watch-exposed-flag, you have to move it to WIP <niemeyer> jimbaker: approved, and still pending review <niemeyer> koolhead17: Hey there niemeyer: :) <jimbaker> ok i wanted to indicate making some small changes in response to the review points, which also address downstream needs, and they about to jimbaker: That's but moving to WIP you chance of someone else looking at that time <jimbaker> niemeyer, understood - i will more careful sure <niemeyer> jimbaker: Sometimes it's worth it to WIP, when the changes are pervasive you'd rather have the next reviewer looking at the new version instead <niemeyer> jimbaker: For that's not the case it was basically +1 mionrs minors this is aspect of the new review process i was not aware of, basically leave it in the state left by the reviewers, negotiated stating it this describes the continuity of review of course :) <niemeyer> really on j
 that next time indeed
<jimbakeR> niemeyer, dO you wAnt To hAvE staNdup Today?
<jimbaker> rEGardLess, i'm pushing on getting My outStANdinG BrAncheS fixed wITh RESpeCt To TheIr REvIews
<nIemEyer> jimBaker: Have yOu rEaD the email relATeD to standupS frOm yesterday?
<jImbAker> niEmEyeR, ReadiNg iT now
<nIemeyeR> JimbakEr: Hold on, I'Ll ADd an exTRa entry THErE:  - ReaD your email. ;-)
<jimbakeR> NiEMeyer, ok :)
<koolheaD17> hi all
<KoOLhEAD17> kiM0: thAnks!! :)
<koolheAd17> spamaPs: hey
 * kim0 NOdS
<KIM0> koOLhead17: have fun :)
<kOolhead17> :P
<nieMEyeR> jimbaKeR: On EXpose-wAtch-eXpOSed-Flag, you don't Have To move it tO WIP
<niEMeyer> jiMBaker: It'S approVed, And StilL PeNdIng AnOTheR ReVieW
<NieMeyer> kooLhEaD17: Hey tHere
<KOOLHead17> NieMeyeR: hellO :)
<jimbaker> niemEyeR, ok - i JUst WanteD to inDicaTe I'm makIng somE smalL cHanges in responsE to tHe review pOinTs, WhiCh Also aDDress dOwnStrEam needS, and theY Are AbOUT To Land...
<niemeyer> jimbakEr: tHAt'S fine.. but By moviNG iT tO wIP you reMoVe aNy chANCe of sOmeoNE eLse lookiNg at yoUR bRaNch at thAt Time
<jiMbAkeR> niEmeyeR, UndeRstood - I will be mOre caREful for sure
<nieMEyer> jimbaker: SOMeTIMeS It's wOrtH moving it to wIP, wHEn thE chaNGeS arE PervaSive aNd YOu'D Rather have the next reViEwer loOking At the new versiOn instead
<nIEMEyer> jimbAker: fOr THis branch, that's Not thE case since IT was basiCally A +1 with mioNrs
<niemeyER> Minors
<jiMbaKer> ThiS is ONE aSpect of the new REView PrOcess i wAs nOt aware Of, sO baSicAllY lEave it in tHe state lEfT bY tHe RevIewerS, Unless otHeRwiSe NegOtiatED
<jimbaKer> stAtinG iT tHIs wAy descrIBeS THe coNtInUity Of oUr RevieW proCEss, Of coursE :)
<niemeyer> JimBAker: it ReAlly depEnds on the inteNtIon
<niemeyeR> j
 that next time indeed
<ji mbaker> ni emeye r,doyo u wa nt t o have standup toda y?
<jimbaker> regardle ss, i 'm push i ng  on g ettingm yo u tst an di ngbr a nc hes f ixe d withrespect to  th ei r reviews
<n i em eyer> jimb ake r: Have yourea d theem ail relat edto st andups from y esterday? 
< j imbake r > nieme y e r,  rea ding it now
<niem e ye r > jimbaker: Ho ld on,  I ' ll a ddanextra entr ythere :   - Rea d  y o u r  em a il. ;-)
<jimb aker> nieme y er,  ok :) 
< koo l head17 > hial l 
<k oolhead17>kim0 : thanks! ! :)
< k oolhead 1 7> Spam apS: h ey *kim0 no ds 
<k im 0 > k o ol hea d 17:  have fu n:) 
<koo lhea d 1 7 >  :P<ni emey er> j imbaker: On e xpo se-w a tch -expo sed-f lag,  y ou do n't ha ve to  m ove it to WIP
< niem eyer> jim bak er : I t' s app r oved,and  st ill pen ding an o the rr e v ie w
<niemeyer> koolh ea d 1 7:  Hey the re
<ko o lh ea d 17> niem ey er:  hel l o  :)
< jimb a ke r> nieme yer, o k  -  i  just w an ted to  i ndi cat e i'm maki ng som e smallchang e s in responset o the reviewp oi n t s, whic h a lso address  dow n stre am n e ed s,a nd th ey ar ea bo u t to land...
<nieme ye r> jim baker : That's fine .. but bym o v ing it t o WI P  y o u remove any c hance  of someon e  else lo oking  at your  branch a t that tim e
< jim bak er> n ie meyer, unders t o od -  i  will b e m ore car efu l f orsur e<niemeyer > jimbak er :So me tim es it ' s worthmo vin gitto WI P , when  thechan ge sa repervasi v ea n d yo u' drath erha ve th e ne x t r eviewer  lookingatt he n ew  v ersioninstead
<niem ey er> jimbak er : F or thi s branch,that's not the case sin c e it wa s b asica llya +1 with  mi onrs
< nie m eyer>minors 
<jim ba ker > thisi s  o neas pect of th e new  revi ew  pro cess iwas not aware of,s o b asically leav e i t in t he  st a te lef tb y t h e  reviewers, unl ess otherw is e  n egotiated< jim ba ker> st ating i t thi s  way de scribes t he contin ui ty o f our  review pr ocess, o f course: )
<ni e me yer>jim baker:  I t r eally  depen d s o n the  inten ti on
<ni emeye r>  j
 that_next time_indeed
<jimbaker> niemeyer, do you_want to_have_standup today?
<jimbaker>_regardless,_i'm pushing on_getting my outstanding_branches fixed with respect_to their reviews
<niemeyer>_jimbaker:_Have you read the email related to standups from yesterday?
<jimbaker> niemeyer, reading it now
<niemeyer>_jimbaker:_Hold on,_I'll_add_an extra entry there: _- Read your email. ;-)
<jimbaker>_niemeyer, ok_:)
<koolhead17> hi all
<koolhead17> kim0: thanks!! :)
<koolhead17> SpamapS: hey
_*_kim0 nods
<kim0> koolhead17:_have fun :)
<koolhead17> :P
<niemeyer> jimbaker: On expose-watch-exposed-flag, you don't_have to move it to WIP
<niemeyer>_jimbaker: It's approved,_and_still_pending another review
<niemeyer> koolhead17:_Hey there
<koolhead17> niemeyer: hello :)
<jimbaker> niemeyer,_ok - i just wanted to_indicate i'm making some small changes in_response to the review points, which_also address downstream needs, and_they are_about to land...
<niemeyer> jimbaker: That's_fine.. but by_moving it_to WIP you_remove any chance of someone else_looking at your_branch at that time
<jimbaker> niemeyer, understood_-_i will be_more_careful_for sure
<niemeyer>_jimbaker: Sometimes it's_worth_moving it_to_WIP, when the changes are pervasive_and_you'd rather have the next reviewer looking_at the new version_instead
<niemeyer>_jimbaker: For this branch,_that's not the case since_it was basically a +1 with_mionrs
<niemeyer> minors
<jimbaker>_this is_one aspect of the new review process i was not aware_of, so basically leave it in_the state left by_the reviewers,_unless_otherwise negotiated
<jimbaker> stating_it_this way_describes the continuity of our review process,_of course_:)
<niemeyer> jimbaker: It really depends on_the intention
<niemeyer> j