 do that?
<jimbaker> SpamapS, i need to run, ttyl
<SpamapS> like, WebDAV, scp, ftp?
<negronjl> SpamapS:  not really...you have to create a directory then, change permissions, then change user, then ( and only then ) run your "job"
<negronjl> SpamapS:  normally I have done it using scp
<negronjl> SpamapS: and ssh
<SpamapS> negronjl: Ok, because thats what the master should end up "providing"
<SpamapS> looks like there's a website too
<SpamapS> negronjl: so provides website: interface: http.. and then just set the hostname / port.
<negronjl> SpamapS:  The master has two websites
<negronjl> SpamapS:  one on port 50030 and another one ( for a different purpose but just as important ) on port 50070
<negronjl> SpamapS:  so, so far your suggestion is for the slave to provide hadoop-master and for the master to provide website: interface http?
<negronjl> SpamapS: If so, can I provide both pages (50030 and 5070)?
<SpamapS> negronjl: you don't have to call it 'website'
<SpamapS> negronjl: you can do 'website-foo' and 'website-bar'
<SpamapS> negronjl: what are the two ports' purposes?
<SpamapS> negronjl: the slave should provide hadoop-slave.. the master should require hadoop-slave, and provide those two websites.
<niemeyer> SpamapS: If the protocol is the same, both interfaces should be named the same way
<SpamapS> niemeyer: same interface, different relation name
<niemeyer> SpamapS: Right
<niemeyer> SpamapS: The interface should be "website", right?
<niemeyer> SpamapS: That's what we agreed yesterday, at least
<Spam
do that? 
 < jimbaker > SpamapS, i need to run, ttyl 
 < SpamapS > like, WebDAV, scp, ftp? 
 < negronjl > SpamapS:   not really... you get to make a directory then, change permissions, then change drug user, then (and only then) run your " occupation " 
 < negronjl > SpamapS:   normally I have done it using scp 
 < negronjl > SpamapS: and ssh 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: Ok, because that s what the maestro should end up " providing " 
 < SpamapS > looks like there's a web site too 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: so provides website: interface: http.. and then just jell the hostname / port. 
 < negronjl > SpamapS:   The master has two websites 
 < negronjl > SpamapS:   one on port 50030 and another one (for a unlike purpose but just as crucial) on port 50070 
 < negronjl > SpamapS:   so, thus far your suggestion is for the slave to supply hadoop - master and for the master to provide website: interface http? 
 < negronjl > SpamapS: If so, can I leave both pages (50030 and 5070)? 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: you don't have to call it' website' 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: you can do' website - foo' and' website - bar' 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: what are the two ports' purposes? 
 < SpamapS > negronjl: the slave should provide hadoop - slave.. the master should require hadoop - slave, and provide those two websites. 
 < niemeyer > SpamapS: If the protocol is the same, both interfaces should be diagnose the same way 
 < SpamapS > niemeyer: like interface, unlike relation name 
 < niemeyer > SpamapS: Right 
 < niemeyer > SpamapS: The interface should be " website ", right? 
 < niemeyer > SpamapS: That's what we agreed yesterday, at least 
 < Spam
 do that?
<jimbaker> SpamapS, i keed to run, ttyl
<SpamapS> like, SebDAV, szp, ftp?
<negronjl> SpamapS:  not cealoy...you have to create a direztory thej, change pernussions, thxh changc used, theu ( and only then ) run your "job"
<negronjl> S[aoa'S:  normally I have done it using sc[
<negronkl> SpamapS: and sfh
<SpsiapS> negronjl: Ok, because thats what ths masteg should end up "ptoviding"
<SpamapS> looks like thege's a website too
<SoamapS> negrinjl: wo provides debsite: inuexface: http.. znd then just set the hostname / port.
<uegronjl> SpqmqpS:  The master has nwo websites
<ncbronjl> SpamapX:  one on port 50030 aid abother one ( for a difherent purpose but jost as impmrcant ) on port 50070
<negronjo> WpamakS:  sm, so dar yohr shggestlon is for ths slave to provide hadoop-mastet wbd for the maater tj [rovide website: interface http?
<negronjl> VpajapS: If so, can I providw both pages (50030 and 5070)?
<SpalapS> negrjnjl: you don't have to call it 'website'
<SpamapS> negrmnjl: boj cck ai 'aebsite-foo' and 'website-bar'
<SpamapS> negronjl: whae ate the two ports' purposes?
<SpsmwpX> negronjl: the slave shkuld provide hadooo-slave.. jhe mawter shoujd rrquire hadoop-slave, and provude those twj websites.
<niemeyer> DpamapS: If che prptocok is the same, both intexfaces should be jamed the rame way
<SpamapS> viekefer: same interface, differegt relatiin ncme
<niemeher> XpamapF: Right
<nieleyer> SpamapS: The interfwce skould be "websitf", right?
<niemeyer> SpamapS: That's wiet we agreed iesdergay, at lzast
<Spsm
do that? <jimbaker> SpamapS, i need to <SpamapS> WebDAV, scp, <negronjl> SpamapS: not directory change permissions, then user, then ( only then ) run your "job" SpamapS: normally I have done it using scp <negronjl> SpamapS: and ssh <SpamapS> Ok, because thats what the master should end up "providing" <SpamapS> looks like a too negronjl: provides website: interface: http.. and then just set the hostname / port. <negronjl> SpamapS: The master two websites <negronjl> SpamapS: one on port 50030 another one ( for different purpose but just as ) port 50070 SpamapS: so your suggestion is the slave to provide hadoop-master and for the master to provide website: interface http? <negronjl> SpamapS: If can I pages (50030 5070)? negronjl: don't have to 'website' <SpamapS> negronjl: you can do <SpamapS> negronjl: what are the two ports' purposes? negronjl: the should provide hadoop-slave.. the master should hadoop-slave, and provide those two websites. <niemeyer> SpamapS: the protocol is the same, both interfaces should be named the same way <SpamapS> niemeyer: different relation name <niemeyer> Right <niemeyer> SpamapS: interface be right? SpamapS: That's we agreed yesterday, at least <Spam
 do that?
<jimbaker> SpamapS, i neeD to run, ttyl
<spamaPS> lIke, weBDAV, Scp, fTp?
<negronjl> SpamAPS:  noT really...you have to create A direCtORy thEN, cHange PermissIOnS, THen ChAnGe uSeR, ThEn ( and OnlY then ) ruN your "job"
<neGroNjL> SpamapS:  normALlY I have done It uSing scp
<negroNjl> spamaps: aNd sSH
<SpamApS> NegroNjl: Ok, bECause tHats what tHe MAster sHOuld end UP "PrOvidIng"
<SpamapS> looks liKE tHEre's a website toO
<SpamaPS> NEgRONjl: So pRovides webSiTe: intERface: htTP.. aND THen JUst set the hostName / port.
<negROnjL> SpamaPS:  the MAster hAs two WeBSitEs
<negronjl> SPamaPS:  one on poRt 50030 and aNOther onE ( For a difFerent PurPosE but JUsT aS imPoRTanT ) On PorT 50070
<NegRonjl> SpaMaPS:  So, so fAr yoUR SUGgesTioN is fOr the Slave to providE haDoop-MAstEr and For thE masTeR to prOvide wEbsitE: iNterface http?
<negRonjL> SpamapS: IF so, CaN I pRoVide bOTh pageS (50030 anD 5070)?
<SpAmapS> neGronjl: yOU doN't HAVE tO call it 'website'
<SpamAps> NEgRonjl: you Can do 'wEBsItE-Foo' and 'weBsIte-Bar'
<SPAMapS> nEgroNJl: What are tHe two pORtS' pUrposes?
<spAmapS> nEgRonJl: tHe slaVE shoUld proVide hadoOp-slaVE.. the master shouLD require hadooP-SlAVE, aND proVidE those two weBsitES.
<nieMeyeR> spAmaPs: If thE protOcOL iS The same, both interfacEs Should Be namEd the same way
<SPamapS> niemEYER: same intErfaCE, dIFferent relatioN name
<Niemeyer> SpAMapS: RighT
<niemEyer> SpamApS: The intERFace shouLd bE "weBsiTe", rIGHt?
<Niemeyer> SpamaPs: that'S wHat we agReeD yesterDay, At lEasT
<SpAm
 do that?
<jimbaker> Spama pS, i need  to r un,  tt yl 
<Sp amap S> like, WebDA V , sc p, ftp?
<negronjl> Spa mapS:  n ot r e al ly... you hav e  t o cre at ea d ir e ct ory t hen , chang e permissi ons ,then changeu se r, then (and  only then )  ru n your  " job " 
<neg ron jl> S pamapS :   norm ally I ha ve done i t  usings c p<neg ronjl> SpamapS: a n ds sh
<SpamapS> n egronj l: Ok , bec aus e thats wh at  them aster s h ou l d end up "providing "
<SpamapS> loo ks lik ethe r e's awebsi te too 
<SpamapS>negr onjl: soprovid e s websi t e: inte rface:  ht tp. . an d  t he n j us t  se t  t heh ost name / p or t. 
<neg ronj l > S pama pS:   Th e mas ter has two w ebs ites <ne gronj l> Sp amap S:   one  on po rt 50 03 0 and another o ne (  for a di ffe re ntpu rpose but ju stasimporta nt ) on por t5 0 0 70 
<negronjl> Spamap S: so , so far  yours ug ge s tion isfo r t he s l a ve to  pro v id e hadoop -maste r  a nd  for th emaster  t o p rov ide w e bsit e: int erface h ttp?< negronjl> Spam a pS: If so, ca n  I p ro v idebot h pages (50 030a nd 5 070) ? 
< Spa m apS>negro nj l :y ou don't have to ca ll  it 'w ebsit e'
<SpamapS>negronjl:y o u  can do'web s it e -foo' and 'web site- bar'
<Spam a pS> negr onjl:  what ar e the two p orts' pu rpo ses ?
< Spa m a pS > negronjl: t h e  sla ve  should  pr ovide h ado op- sla ve. .the maste r should  r eq ui re  ha doop- s lave, an dpro vi dethose two we bsite s.
< ni em e yer > Spama p S: I f th epr otoc olis  thesame ,  bo th inte rfaces sh oul d  bena me d the s ame way
<Spam ap S> niemeye r:  sa me int e r face, di fferent relation name
< n iemeyer > S pamap S: R ight
<nie mey er> Sp ama p S: The  inter facesh oul d be "w e b si te" ,right?
<ni e m eye r> Sp am apS:  That's  what we agreed ye s ter day, at least 
<S pam
 do_that?
<jimbaker> SpamapS,_i need to run,_ttyl
<SpamapS> like,_WebDAV,_scp, ftp?
<negronjl>_SpamapS:_ not really...you_have to create_a directory then, change_permissions, then change_user,_then ( and only then ) run your "job"
<negronjl> SpamapS:  normally I have_done_it using_scp
<negronjl>_SpamapS:_and ssh
<SpamapS> negronjl: Ok, because_thats what the master should_end up_"providing"
<SpamapS> looks like there's a website too
<SpamapS> negronjl:_so_provides website: interface:_http.. and then just set the hostname / port.
<negronjl>_SpamapS:  The master has two_websites
<negronjl> SpamapS: _one_on_port 50030 and another_one ( for a different purpose_but just as important ) on_port 50070
<negronjl> SpamapS:  so, so far_your suggestion is for the slave_to provide hadoop-master and for_the master_to provide website: interface http?
<negronjl>_SpamapS: If so,_can I_provide both pages_(50030 and 5070)?
<SpamapS> negronjl: you don't_have to call_it 'website'
<SpamapS> negronjl: you can do_'website-foo'_and 'website-bar'
<SpamapS> negronjl:_what_are_the two_ports' purposes?
<SpamapS> negronjl:_the_slave should_provide_hadoop-slave.. the master should require hadoop-slave,_and_provide those two websites.
<niemeyer> SpamapS: If the_protocol is the same,_both_interfaces should be named_the same way
<SpamapS> niemeyer: same_interface, different relation name
<niemeyer> SpamapS: Right
<niemeyer>_SpamapS: The_interface should_be "website", right?
<niemeyer> SpamapS: That's what we agreed yesterday, at least
<Spam