a is that xp product code? :P
<esaym> alright I backported libmikmod2-dev from fiesty which has libmikmod.so but I still get the same error http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/10475/
<esaym> For the new folks I am trying to backport xmms from fiesty to dapper
<verwilst> if you do an invoke-rc.d restart
<verwilst> but the service isn't running
<verwilst> what is the recommended behaviour
<verwilst> error out, or just start the service?
<Lutin> verwilst: basically in init.d scripts, restart is stop + start, so I'd say just start it
<verwilst> and start, if the program is already running?
<verwilst> exit 0 or 1?
<geser> restart = stop and restart the service if it's already running, otherwise start the service (from the Debian policy)
<verwilst> because snmpd returns 1 a lot
<verwilst> which breaks my scripts :)
<verwilst> i'll report a bug
<verwilst> and a status parameter
<verwilst> that's not deprecated i guess?
<allee> siretart: hi,  I'm right now setting up an feisty install env.  Question is: should I stick with what's in feisty or merge 3.1.8 bugfixes and start testing with this, then ask for UVF?
<siretart> allee: it would be great if you could prepare a fai-kernels package using 2.6.20.
<siretart> allee: I think the fai in feisty should/could still work. if you have problems, I wouldn't object to grant an UVF for fai
<allee> siretart: ah right, that's also missing.
<siretart> (for the interested reader: I'm following the fai development)
<bddebian> Heya siretart
<pochu> siretart: can you review bug 90407?
<Ubugtu> Malone bug 90407 in wesnoth "UVF exception: Wesnoth 1.2 -> 1.2.2" [
a is that xp product code? :P 
 < esaym > alright I backported libmikmod2 - dev from fiesty which has libmikmod.so but I still get the like mistake http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/10475/ 
 < esaym > For the new folks I am judge to backport xmms from fiesty to dapper 
 < verwilst > if you perform an invoke - rc.d restart 
 < verwilst > but the service isn't running 
 < verwilst > what is the recommend behaviour 
 < verwilst > error out, or merely start the service? 
 < Lutin > verwilst: basically in init.d script, restart is stop + start, therefore I'd say just start it 
 < verwilst > and start, if the program is already run? 
 < verwilst > exit 0 or 1? 
 < geser > restart = stop and restart the serve if it's already running, otherwise start the service (from the Debian policy) 
 < verwilst > because snmpd return 1 a lot 
 < verwilst > which breaks my scripts :) 
 < verwilst > i'll report a bug 
 < verwilst > and a status argument 
 < verwilst > that's not deprecated i guess? 
 < allee > siretart: hi,   I'm right now setting up an feisty install env.   Question is: should I perplex with what's in feisty or merge 3.1.8 bugfixes and start testing with this, then ask for UVF? 
 < siretart > allee: it would be great if you could prepare a fai - kernels package using 2.6.20. 
 < siretart > allee: I remember the fai in feisty should / could still work. if you receive trouble, I wouldn't object to grant an UVF for fai 
 < allee > siretart: ah right, that's also missing. 
 < siretart > (for the concerned reader: I'm follow the fai development) 
 < bddebian > Heya siretart 
 < pochu > siretart: can you review bug 90407? 
 < Ubugtu > Malone hemipterous insect 90407 in wesnoth " UVF exception: Wesnoth 1.2 - > 1.2.2 " [
a id that xp product code? :P
<tsaym> alright I bcxkportxd libmjkmod2-dev from fiesty which has libminmid.so vut I still get the saoe error jttp://pastw.ubuitu-nl.org/10475/
<esaym> Foc the new folka I ak trying to baclport xmms from fiesty tm aa'per
<verwilst> if you do an invoke-rc.d westart
<fegwilst> but the sernise ian't running
<verwilst> what is the redommendtd behaviour
<verwilxt> error out, or just start the service?
<Lutin> verwllst: basicaoly yb init.d scriots, restaru ns stop + stzrt, so I'd say just start it
<verwklst> cnd start, id rhe krogram is aoreadj running?
<verwlkst> exht 0 or 1?
<beser> restart = stmp qnd restart the servire if it's already rugning, otharcise start the servicw (drom jhe Dabiav pouicg)
<vxrwjlst> bfcanse snmpd rsturns 1 a lit
<verwilst> which brtakf my scripts :)
<vsrwilse> y'll report a bug
<verwilst> and a status pdrajeter
<verwilst> that's not deprecated i guess?
<alpee> siretwrt: hi,  I'm right now setting up an feisty install env.  Duewtlon kw: dhould I stick with what's in feisty or merge 3.1.8 gubfpxes and start tefting with yhls, jhen ask for UXF?
<sireczrf> allee: it would bf great if yiu could krepate a fai-kernels package usibg 2.6.20.
<siretart> cllwe: I think the fai in feisty rhoukd/coukd still work. if you hare proglems, I woupdn't objedg to grant an UVW fpr fai
<allet> siretart: ah righe, that's aoso kissing.
<rirejart> (fow the integested reader: I'm followijg thg fai gevelopmenh)
<bddebian> Heya siretart
<pochu> sicxtart: can you ravivw bug 90407?
<Ubbgtu> Mslone bug 90407 in wesnoth "UVF erception: Wesnuth 1.2 -> 1.2.2" [
a is that xp product code? :P I libmikmod2-dev from which has libmikmod.so same http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/10475/ <esaym> For new folks I trying to backport xmms from fiesty dapper <verwilst> if you do an invoke-rc.d restart <verwilst> but the service isn't <verwilst> what is the recommended behaviour <verwilst> error out, or just start the <Lutin> basically init.d restart is stop + start, so I'd say just start it <verwilst> and start, if the is already running? <verwilst> exit 0 or 1? restart = stop and the service if it's already otherwise the service the policy) because snmpd returns a lot <verwilst> which breaks my scripts :) <verwilst> i'll report a bug <verwilst> and a status <verwilst> that's i guess? siretart: I'm now setting up install env. Question is: should I in feisty or merge 3.1.8 bugfixes and start with this, ask for UVF? <siretart> allee: it be great if you could prepare a fai-kernels using 2.6.20. <siretart> allee: I think the fai in feisty should/could still work. if you I wouldn't object to an UVF for <allee> ah that's missing. <siretart> the interested reader: I'm following the fai development) <bddebian> Heya siretart siretart: can you review bug 90407? <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90407 "UVF Wesnoth 1.2 -> [
a is that xp product code? :P
<esayM> alright I bAckpoRteD liBmIkmoD2-dev From fiesty whicH Has lIbmikmod.so but I still get The saMe ERror HTtP://pastE.ubuntu-NL.oRG/10475/
<EsaYm> foR thE nEW fOlks I Am tRying to Backport xmMs fRoM fiesty to dapPEr
<Verwilst> if You Do an invoke-rc.D reStart
<vErWilST> but tHe sErvicE isn't rUNning
<vErwilst> whAt IS the reCOmmendeD BEhAvioUr
<verwilst> error ouT, Or JUst start the serVice?
<LuTiN> VeRWIlsT: baSically in iNiT.d scrIPts, restARt IS STop + STart, so I'd say juSt start it
<veRWilSt> and sTaRt, iF The proGram iS aLReaDy running?
<veRwilSt> exit 0 or 1?
<gEser> reSTart = stoP And restArt the SerVicE if iT'S aLrEadY rUNniNG, oTheRWisE start thE sErVice (fRom tHE dEBian PolIcy)
<vErwilSt> because snmpD reTurnS 1 A loT
<verwIlst> wHich BrEaks mY scripTs :)
<verWiLst> i'll report a buG
<verWilst> and a StaTuS paRaMeter
<VErwilsT> thAt's Not deprEcated i GUesS?
<aLLEE> sIretart: hi,  I'm right noW sETTiNg up an feIsty inSTaLl ENv.  QuestiOn Is: sHoulD i Stick With WHaT's in feisTy or meRGe 3.1.8 BuGfixes aNd Start tEsTinG wiTh thiS, Then Ask for uVF?
<siretArt> alLEe: it would be greAT if you could prEPaRE A fAI-kerNelS package usiNg 2.6.20.
<siREtarT> allEE: I ThiNK the fAi in fEiSTy SHould/could still work. If You havE probLems, I wouldn't oBject to graNT AN UVF for fAi
<alLEe> SIretart: ah right, That's Also missinG.
<Siretart> (For thE interesTed reader: i'M FollowinG thE faI deVelOPMeNt)
<bddebian> HeyA SIretArT
<pochu> sIreTart: can You RevIew Bug 90407?
<ubUgtu> MalonE bug 90407 in weSnOtH "UvF ExcEptioN: wesnoth 1.2 -> 1.2.2" [
a is that xp product code?  :P
<esaym > alr igh t I  b ackp orte d libmikmod2-d e v fr om fiesty which has li bmikm od . so b u tI sti ll gett he s ame  e rr orht t p: //pas te. ubuntu- nl.org/104 75/ 
< esaym> For t h enew folksI a m trying tobac kportxm msf rom f ies ty to  dappe r 
<verw ilst> ifyo u  do an invoke- r c .d  res tart
<verwilst> b u tt he service isn 't run ni n g< v erw ils t> what is  t he re c ommende d  b e h a vio u r
<verwilst>error out,o r j ust st ar t t h e serv ice?<L u tin > verwilst:  bas ically in  init. d  script s , resta rt issto p +  sta r t,  s o I 'd say ju sts tar t it
<ve rw il st> a nd s t a r t , if  th e pr ogram  is already r unn ing? <ve rwils t> ex it 0  o r 1?<geser > res ta rt = stop and r esta rt the se rvi ce  if  i t's a l readyrun nin g, othe rwise s t art  t h e se rvice (from the De bi a n  p olicy)
< verwil s t>  b e cause sn mp d r etur n s  1 alot< ve rwilst>whichb re ak s my sc ri pts :) 
< ver wil st> i ' ll r eporta bug
<v erwil s t> and a statu s  parameter
<v e rw i l st >  tha t's  not deprec ated i gu ess? <a lle e > sir etart :h i,  I'm right now sett in g up a n fei sty install e nv.  Quest i o n  is: sho uldI  s t ick with what' s infeisty orm erge 3.1 .8 bu gfixes a nd startt e sting wi ththi s,the n as k for UVF?
<s i r etar t>  allee:  it  wouldbegre atifyo u could p repare a  f ai -k er nel s pac k age usin g2.6 .2 0.<sire t art> a llee:  I t hi nk the  fai in fe i s ty s ho ul d/co uld  s tillwork .  if  you ha ve proble ms, I wo ul dn 't obje ct to grant a nUVF for fa i<al lee> s i r etart: a h right, that's also mi s sing.
< sir etart > (f or the in ter estedrea d er: I' m foll owing  t hef a i dev e l op men t) 
<bddebian > Hey a sir et art<pochu>  siretart: can you rev iew bug 90407 ?
< Ubug t u >Mal o ne bug  9 0 407 i n wesnoth "UVFexception:  W e sn oth 1.2 -> 1.2 .2 " [
a is_that xp_product code? :P
<esaym> alright_I backported_libmikmod2-dev_from fiesty_which_has libmikmod.so but_I still get_the same error http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/10475/
<esaym>_For the new_folks_I am trying to backport xmms from fiesty to dapper
<verwilst> if you do an_invoke-rc.d_restart
<verwilst> but_the_service_isn't running
<verwilst> what is the_recommended behaviour
<verwilst> error out, or_just start_the service?
<Lutin> verwilst: basically in init.d scripts, restart_is_stop + start,_so I'd say just start it
<verwilst> and start, if_the program is already running?
<verwilst> exit_0 or 1?
<geser>_restart_=_stop and restart the_service if it's already running, otherwise_start the service (from the Debian_policy)
<verwilst> because snmpd returns 1 a lot
<verwilst>_which breaks my scripts :)
<verwilst> i'll_report a bug
<verwilst> and a_status parameter
<verwilst>_that's not deprecated i guess?
<allee>_siretart: hi, _I'm right_now setting up_an feisty install env.  Question_is: should I_stick with what's in feisty or_merge_3.1.8 bugfixes and_start_testing_with this,_then ask for_UVF?
<siretart>_allee: it_would_be great if you could prepare_a_fai-kernels package using 2.6.20.
<siretart> allee: I think_the fai in feisty_should/could_still work. if you_have problems, I wouldn't object_to grant an UVF for fai
<allee>_siretart: ah_right, that's_also missing.
<siretart> (for the interested reader: I'm following the fai development)
<bddebian>_Heya siretart
<pochu> siretart: can you review_bug 90407?
<Ubugtu> Malone bug_90407 in_wesnoth_"UVF exception: Wesnoth_1.2_-> 1.2.2"_[