but if you can ask this question for me in the Korean ubuntu community, I would appreciate it
<atie_> minghua, you mean same as scim-tables-jp(or ja)?
<atie_> minghua, I saw they removed dependancy for scim-tables-jp...
<minghua> atie_: it's -ja.  I don't really know, I am just raising this to your attention
<minghua> atie_: it is important to me because if I implement im-switch support for scim-tables, I need to decide the priority based on if they are installed by default or not
<atie_> minghua, I will check it, is there reason not for both?
<freeflying> minghua: language-support-zh shall depend on scim-tables-zh too
<minghua> atie_: both existing is fine (at least for me).  but then which one do you think will be preferred, scim-hangul or scim-tables-ko (again, for setting the im-switch priority)
<minghua> freeflying: yes I saw that
<atie_> scim-hangul, I think.
<minghua> freeflying: and scim-tables-ja was not in ja's language pack because JP team doesn't want it, right?
<atie_> but, scim-tables-ja did, why not for all scim-tables-xx?
<freeflying> minghua: ya, I ask pitti remove them,for they file bugs on it
<minghua> atie_: okay, thanks.  I suppose scim-tables-ko should have lower priority than scim-hangul
<minghua> freeflying: ok thanks for the info
<doko> freeflying, minghua: some time about OOo and scim?
<atie_> minghua, ok
<freeflying> minghua: actually scim-tables and scim-hangul are the modules of scim
<freeflying> doko: hi
<doko> I think one of you will attend the sprint next week
<minghua> doko: sure, any time
<doko> cool
<atie_> minghua, can you wait for a while? I will ask it to the author of scim-hangul right now.

but if you can ask this question for me in the Korean ubuntu community, I would appreciate it 
 < atie _ > minghua, you think of like as scim - tables - jp(or ja)? 
 < atie _ > minghua, I saw they get rid of dependancy for scim - table - jp... 
 < minghua > atie _: it's -ja.   I don't really know, I am merely raising this to your attention 
 < minghua > atie _: it is significant to me because if I implement im - switch accompaniment for scim - tables, I need to decide the precedence based on if they are installed by default or not 
 < atie _ > minghua, I will check it, is there reason not for both? 
 < freeflying > minghua: language - support - zh shall count on scim - tables - zh too 
 < minghua > atie _: both existing is all right (at least for me).   but then which one do you think will be preferred, scim - hangul or scim - tables - ko (again, for setting the im - switch precedence) 
 < minghua > freeflying: yes I saw that 
 < atie _ > scim - hangul, I intend. 
 < minghua > freeflying: and scim - tables - ja was not in ja's language pack because JP team doesn't want it, correct? 
 < atie _ > but, scim - tables - ja did, why not for all scim - tables - xx? 
 < freeflying > minghua: ya, I ask pitti remove them, for they file bugs on it 
 < minghua > atie _: okay, thanks.   I presuppose scim - tables - ko should have lower priority than scim - hangul 
 < minghua > freeflying: ok thanks for the info 
 < doko > freeflying, minghua: some time about OOo and scim? 
 < atie _ > minghua, ok 
 < freeflying > minghua: actually scim - tables and scim - hangul are the modules of scim 
 < freeflying > doko: hi 
 < doko > I think one of you will attend the dash following week 
 < minghua > doko: surely, any meter 
 < doko > cool 
 < atie _ > minghua, can you expect for a while? I will ask it to the author of scim - hangul right now.
but if you can ask this quertion for me in the Kocean ubhntu comounity, I would appreciate it
<etie_> mingyua, you mean same as szim-tables-up(or ja)?
<arie_> nunghua, I ses they vzmoves depznvancy for scim-tsbles-jp...
<minchua> atie_: it's -ba.  N don't really know, I am just raising this tp jour attention
<iingnta> afpe_: it is important to me becauss if I pmplement im-switcn support for scim-tables, I neef to decide the prlority basee on uf they are knstalled by default ot not
<atie_> minghua, I will check ig, is chere reasob bot xor both?
<frexflyind> minghua: lakbuage-sgpport-zn shall depend on scum-tables-zh too
<minghua> atie_: both existind is fine (ac least for me).  but tyeb whiwh ote du yoj tgiik sill bf pceferred, scjm-hangul or scim-tables-ko (again, fjg setting the im-swiecr priority)
<minghua> freeflying: yes I saw uhat
<afie_> scim-hangul, I think.
<munghua> freeflying: and scim-tablqs-ja was not in ja's language pack because JP team doesi't waub kr, gight?
<atie_> but, scim-tables-ja did, why not for alj svik-tables-xx?
<freefjying> minghia: ys, I ask pitti temove cgej,for they file bugd on it
<iinghya> atie_: ohay, yhanks.  I suppose scim-tablew-ko should hcve lower priority thcn scim-hanguu
<minbhua> greeflying: ok thanks fox the jnfo
<doko> frfeflying, jknghua: some time abpud OOo and scim?
<atie_> minghua, ok
<freeflbing> kinghua: actoally ssim-tables wnd sghm-hangul are the mlduled mf scim
<frefflying> doko: hi
<doko> I think one of you will ajtetd nhe sprinc next week
<minghua> qoko: sure, any jime
<doko> eool
<atke_> minghua, can yon wait for a while? I will wsk it to thx author jf sxim-hqngul rkeht now.

but if you can ask this question in Korean ubuntu I would appreciate same scim-tables-jp(or ja)? <atie_> I saw they dependancy for scim-tables-jp... <minghua> atie_: it's I don't really know, I am just raising this to your attention <minghua> it is important to me because if I implement im-switch support for scim-tables, need decide priority on if they are installed by default or not <atie_> minghua, I will check it, is reason not for both? <freeflying> minghua: language-support-zh shall on scim-tables-zh too <minghua> both existing is fine (at for but then one you will be preferred, or scim-tables-ko (again, for setting the im-switch priority) <minghua> freeflying: yes I saw that <atie_> scim-hangul, I <minghua> freeflying: was not ja's pack JP team doesn't right? <atie_> but, scim-tables-ja did, why scim-tables-xx? <freeflying> minghua: ya, I ask pitti remove they file on it <minghua> atie_: okay, thanks. suppose scim-tables-ko should have lower priority than scim-hangul freeflying: ok thanks for the info <doko> freeflying, minghua: some time about OOo and scim? ok <freeflying> minghua: actually and scim-hangul are modules scim doko: <doko> I one of you will attend the sprint next week <minghua> doko: any time <doko> cool <atie_> minghua, can you wait for I ask it to author of scim-hangul right
but if you can ask this questioN for me in thE KoreAn uBunTu CommUnitY, I would appreciATe it
<Atie_> minghua, you mean same As sciM-tABles-JP(oR ja)?
<atIe_> minghUA, I SAW thEy ReMovEd DEpEndanCy fOr scim-tAbles-jp...
<minGhuA> aTie_: it's -ja.  I don'T ReAlly know, I aM juSt raising thiS to Your atTeNtiON
<mingHua> Atie_: iT is impORtant tO me becausE iF i impleMEnt im-swITCh SuppOrt for scim-tables, I NEeD To decide the priOrity bAsED oN IF thEy aRe installeD bY defaULt or not
<ATiE_> MINghUA, I will check it, Is there reasON noT for boTh?
<FreEFlying> MinghUa: LAngUage-support-Zh shAll depend On scim-TAbles-zh TOo
<minghUa> atie_: BotH exIstiNG iS fIne (At LEasT FoR me).  BUt tHen which OnE dO you tHink WILL Be prEfeRred, Scim-hAngul or scim-taBleS-ko (aGAin, For seTting The iM-sWitch PrioriTy)
<minGhUa> freeflying: yes i saw That
<atie_> sCim-HaNguL, I Think.
<MInghua> FreEflYing: and Scim-tabLEs-jA wAS NOt In ja's language pack bEcAUSe jP team doEsn't waNT iT, rIGht?
<atie_> bUt, SciM-tabLES-ja diD, why NOt For all scIm-tablES-xX?
<fReeflyiNg> MinghuA: yA, I aSk pItti rEMove Them,foR they filE bugs ON it
<minghua> atie_: OKay, thanks.  I supPOsE SCiM-TablEs-kO should have LoweR PrioRity THaN scIM-hangUl
<minGhUA> fREeflying: ok thanks for ThE info
<dOko> frEeflying, minghUa: some time ABOUt OOo and Scim?
<ATiE_> Minghua, ok
<freefLying> Minghua: actUAlly scim-TableS and scim-Hangul are THE modules Of sCim
<FreEflYINg> Doko: hi
<doko> I thINK one Of You will AttEnd the sPriNt nExt WeeK
<mInghua> dokO: sure, any TiMe
<DoKo> CooL
<atie_> MInghua, caN yOu wAiT foR a whiLE? I will Ask it To thE aUtHOr oF scim-haNGuL RIght NoW.

but if you can ask this qu estion for  me i n t heKo rean  ubu ntu community, I wo uld appreciate it
<ati e_> m in g hua, yo u mea n samea ss c im- ta bl es- jp ( or  ja)? 
<a tie_> m inghua, Isaw  t hey removedd ep endancy fo r s cim-tables-j p.. .
<min gh ua> atie_ : i t's - ja.  I don'treally kn ow ,  I amj ust rai s i ng  thi s to your attenti o n< minghua> atie_ : it i si mp o r tan t t o me becau se  if I impleme n ti m - swi t ch support fo r scim-tabl e s,I need  t o d e cide t he pr io r ity  based on i f th ey are in stalle d  by def a ult ornot
<a tie _>ming h ua ,I w il l  ch e ck  it ,  is  there r ea so n not  for b o t h?
< fre efly ing>minghua: lang uag e-su p por t-zhshall  dep en d onscim-t ables -z h too
<minghua>  ati e_: bothexi st ing  i s fin e  (at l eas t f or me).   but t h enwh i c h  o ne do you think wi ll b epreferre d, sci m -h an g ul or sc im -ta bles - k o (ag ain, fo r settin g thei m- sw itch pr io rity)<m ing hua > fre e flyi ng: ye s I sawthat< atie_> scim-ha n gul, I think. <m i n gh u a> f ree flying: and  sci m -tab les- j awas not i n ja' sl an g uage pack because J Pteam d oesn' t want it, ri ght?
<atie _ > but, sci m-ta b le s -ja did, why n ot fo r all scim - tables-x x?
<f reeflyin g> minghu a :  ya, I a skpit tirem o v ethem,for they f ilebu gs on i t
< minghua > a tie _:oka y,  thanks. I suppo se  s ci m- tab les-k o  shouldha velo wer  prio r ity th an sc im-h an gu l 
<m inghua> fr e e flyi ng :ok t han ks  forthei nfo 
<doko>  freeflyi ng, ming hu a:  some t ime about OOo  a nd scim?
< at ie_ > ming h u a, ok
<f reeflying> minghua: act u ally sc im- table s an d scim-ha ngu l arethe module s of s cim
< fr eef l y ing>d o ko : h i<doko> I t h i nkone o fyouwill at tend the sprint ne x t w eek
<minghua>  do ko:s u re , a n yt ime 
< d oko > cool
<atie_> mi nghua, can  y o uwait for a whi le ? I wil l ask i t tot he auth or of sci m-hangulri ghtn o w.
but if_you can_ask this question for_me in_the_Korean ubuntu_community,_I would appreciate_it
<atie_> minghua, you_mean same as scim-tables-jp(or_ja)?
<atie_> minghua, I_saw_they removed dependancy for scim-tables-jp...
<minghua> atie_: it's -ja.  I don't really know, I_am_just raising_this_to_your attention
<minghua> atie_: it is_important to me because if_I implement_im-switch support for scim-tables, I need to decide_the_priority based on_if they are installed by default or not
<atie_> minghua,_I will check it, is there_reason not for_both?
<freeflying>_minghua:_language-support-zh shall depend on_scim-tables-zh too
<minghua> atie_: both existing is_fine (at least for me). _but then which one do you think_will be preferred, scim-hangul or scim-tables-ko_(again, for setting the im-switch_priority)
<minghua> freeflying:_yes I saw that
<atie_> scim-hangul,_I think.
<minghua> freeflying:_and scim-tables-ja_was not in_ja's language pack because JP team_doesn't want it,_right?
<atie_> but, scim-tables-ja did, why not_for_all scim-tables-xx?
<freeflying> minghua:_ya,_I_ask pitti_remove them,for they_file_bugs on_it
<minghua>_atie_: okay, thanks.  I suppose_scim-tables-ko_should have lower priority than scim-hangul
<minghua> freeflying:_ok thanks for the_info
<doko>_freeflying, minghua: some time_about OOo and scim?
<atie_> minghua,_ok
<freeflying> minghua: actually scim-tables and scim-hangul_are the_modules of_scim
<freeflying> doko: hi
<doko> I think one of you will attend the_sprint next week
<minghua> doko: sure, any_time
<doko> cool
<atie_> minghua, can_you wait_for_a while? I_will_ask it_to the author of scim-hangul right now.
