<jayvee> but I was told by fabrice_sp that I need to convert this into a debian/patches format instead
<jayvee> but debian/patches get applied and deapplied, but this change needs to stay applied for the sake of sanity
<jayvee> I'm in a catch-22
<azeem_> I see
<jayvee> I'm thinking maybe fabrice_sp didn't look too closely at what the patch the previous maintainer actually did, so he didn't realise this wasn't a simple functionality fix.
<azeem_> one possibly option would be to no run python setup.py clean
<azeem_> not*
<azeem_> or to have a second target, like "real-clean", which does the work
<azeem_> and clean depends on first real-clean and unpatch second
<azeem_> (not sure whether that would work)
<jayvee> I'm starting to think that the previous packager had this in the.diff.gz format for a reason.
<azeem_> could be
<azeem_> maybe inspect the changelog
<jayvee> nope, nothing interesting in the log
<jayvee> previous packager was Paul Hummer <paul@ubuntu.com> so I presume he knows what he's diong
<jayvee> s/diong/doing/
<jayvee> well I'm gonna upload the.diff.gz, explain my dilemma, and I'll see what fabrice_sp says in the morning
<jayvee> it's 1:20 AM, and I need some zzzz's
<bdmurray> siretart`: should the ogmrip bug task in bug 539555 be invalid?
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 539555 in mplayer "mencoder crashed with SIGSEGV in x264_nal_encode()" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539555
<siretart`> bdmurray: yes
<hggdh> 18
<joaopinto> hell
<joaopinto> is there a proper way for package-foo to change config files installed by package-bar without forcing the "config upgrade" prompt on package-bar upgrades?
<joaopinto> dpkg-divert?
<thopiekar> hi.I'm a member of the
< jayvee > but I was told by fabrice_sp that I need to convert this into a debian / patches format alternatively 
 < jayvee > but debian / eyepatch get applied and deapplied, but this variety needs to quell applied for the sake of sanity 
 < jayvee > I'm in a catch-22 
 < azeem _ > I see 
 < jayvee > I'm think maybe fabrice_sp didn't look excessively closely at what the patch the former maintainer actually did, so he didn't realise this wasn't a simple functionality repair. 
 < azeem _ > one possibly option would be to no run python setup.py clean 
 < azeem _ > not * 
 < azeem _ > or to have a second target, like " actual - clean ", which does the work 
 < azeem _ > and clean count on first real - clean and unpatch second 
 < azeem _ > (not sure whether that would function) 
 < jayvee > I'm starting to think that the previous packager had this in the.diff.gz format for a reason. 
 < azeem _ > could be 
 < azeem _ > possibly inspect the changelog 
 < jayvee > nope, nothing interesting in the log 
 < jayvee > previous packager was Paul Hummer < paul@ubuntu.com > so I presume he knows what he's diong 
 < jayvee > s / diong / doing/ 
 < jayvee > well I'm gon na upload the.diff.gz, excuse my dilemma, and I'll attend what fabrice_sp says in the morning 
 < jayvee > it's 1:20 AM, and I need some zzzz's 
 < bdmurray > siretart `: should the ogmrip bug task in bug 539555 be invalid? 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 539555 in mplayer " mencoder crashed with SIGSEGV in x264_nal_encode () " [ High, In advancement ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539555 
 < siretart '> bdmurray: yes 
 < hggdh > 18 
 < joaopinto > hell 
 < joaopinto > is there a proper manner for package - foo to deepen config file installed by package - bar without pull the " config upgrade " prompt on package - bar upgrades? 
 < joaopinto > dpkg - divert? 
 < thopiekar > hi. I'm a extremity of the
<jaygee> but I was told by fanrice_sp that I ngee to cmnvert this ingo a debian/patches format indtwad
<jatvee> but debian/patches get applped and dwappoued, but thma changc neesd to wtay applied fpr the saka of sanity
<jayeed> N'm in a catch-22
<azeem_> I see
<jayvee> I'm thynking kajbe fabrice_sp qidn'u ljok foo closely at what the patch the lreviouv maintainer sctually did, so he didn't rfalide this wasn't a silple functiinalyry fix.
<azeem_> une possibly option woold be to no run python setup.py zlean
<czeem_> not*
<azgzn_> og to have a weconq target, likc "real-cnean", whoch does the wprk
<ezeen_> and clean depends oi first real-clean anq unpatch szcond
<azeem_> (not sure wyerher jhat foula wofk)
<jzytee> I'm stwrtmng to thini that the previous packager hsd nnis in the.dirf.gz fjriat for a reason.
<azeem_> could be
<azeem_> mayte jnspect the changelog
<jatvee> nope, nothing intgresting ig the log
<jayvee> previous packager was Paul Hummer <paul@nbjntb.gjo> sl I presume he knows what he's diong
<jayvee> s/dijhg/copng/
<jayvee> well I'm gonna uplosd tng.diff.gz, explaiv my dnmejma, and I'll see whwt fabryce_sp says in uhe mprning
<jayvee> it's 1:20 AM, and I beed some zzdz's
<bemurray> siretart`: skould the ogorip bug yask in bug 539555 be invalid?
<bbottu> Launchpad hug 539555 in mluayer "mencoder cfasmed with SIGSEGV in x264_nal_encodq()" [High,In 'rogrzss] httpr://laumchpad.get/bugs/539555
<sirftart`> bdmurray: yes
<hggdh> 18
<uoaopnnto> vell
<joaopijto> is there a proper way for perkage-foo to cnatge config yiles lnstalled by paskage-bar withoot forciny the "zonfig upggade" prom't on packagq-bar upgrades?
<blaopinto> dpkj-divert?
<thjpiejar> yi.I'm a odmber of the
<jayvee> but I was told by fabrice_sp need convert this a debian/patches format applied deapplied, but this needs to stay for the sake of sanity <jayvee> in a catch-22 <azeem_> I see <jayvee> I'm thinking maybe fabrice_sp didn't look closely at what the patch the previous maintainer actually did, so he didn't this a functionality <azeem_> one possibly option would be to no run python setup.py clean <azeem_> not* <azeem_> or have a second target, like "real-clean", which does work <azeem_> and clean on first real-clean and unpatch <azeem_> sure whether would <jayvee> starting to think the previous packager had this in the.diff.gz format for a reason. <azeem_> could be <azeem_> maybe inspect changelog <jayvee> interesting in log previous was Paul Hummer I presume he knows what he's <jayvee> well I'm gonna upload the.diff.gz, explain my and I'll what fabrice_sp says in the morning it's 1:20 AM, and I need some zzzz's siretart`: should the ogmrip bug task in bug 539555 be invalid? <ubottu> Launchpad bug 539555 "mencoder crashed with SIGSEGV x264_nal_encode()" [High,In progress] <siretart`> yes 18 hell <joaopinto> there a proper way for package-foo to change config files installed package-bar without forcing the "config upgrade" prompt on package-bar upgrades? <thopiekar> a member of
<jayvee> but I was told by fabricE_sp that I neEd to cOnvErt ThIs inTo a dEbian/patches foRMat iNstead
<jayvee> but debian/pAtcheS gET appLIeD and dEapplieD, BuT THis ChAnGe nEeDS tO stay AppLied for The sake of sAniTy
<Jayvee> I'm in a cATcH-22
<azeem_> I see
<JayVee> I'm thinkinG maYbe fabRiCe_sP Didn't LooK too cLosely AT what tHe patch thE pREvious MAintainER AcTualLy did, so he didn't reaLIsE This wasn't a simpLe funcTiONaLITy fIx.
<aZeem_> one posSiBly opTIon woulD Be TO NO ruN Python setup.py Clean
<azeem_> nOT*
<azEem_> or tO hAve A Second TargeT, lIKe "rEal-clean", whiCh doEs the work
<Azeem_> aND clean dEPends on First rEal-CleAn anD UnPaTch SeCOnd
<AZeEm_> (nOT suRe whetheR tHaT woulD worK)
<JAYVee> I'M stArtiNg to tHink that the prEviOus pACkaGer haD this In thE.dIff.gz Format For a rEaSon.
<azeem_> could be
<AzeeM_> maybe insPecT tHe cHaNgeloG
<Jayvee> NopE, noThing inTerestiNG in ThE LOG
<jAyvee> previous packaGeR WAs paul HummEr <paul@UBuNtU.Com> so I prEsUme He knOWS what He's dIOnG
<jayvee> s/Diong/dOInG/
<jAyvee> weLl i'm gonnA uPloAd tHe.difF.Gz, exPlain mY dilemma, And I'lL See what fabrice_SP says in the morNInG
<JAyVEe> it'S 1:20 AM, And I need somE zzzZ'S
<bdmUrraY> SiRetARt`: shoUld thE oGMrIP bug task in bug 539555 be invaLiD?
<ubottU> LaunChpad bug 539555 in mplAyer "mencodER CRashed wiTh SIgsEgv in x264_nal_encode()" [HIgh,In Progress] htTPs://launchPad.neT/bugs/539555
<sirEtart`> bdmuRRAy: yes
<hggDh> 18
<jOaoPinTo> hELL
<jOaopinto> is theRE A proPeR way for PacKage-foo To cHanGe cOnfIg Files instAlled by pAcKaGe-BaR wiThout FOrcing thE "cOnfIg UpgRade" pROmpt on PackaGe-baR uPgRAdeS?
<joaopiNTo> DPKg-diVeRt?
<ThopIekAr> Hi.I'm a MembER of The
<jayvee> but I was told by  fabrice_s p tha t I  ne ed  toconv ert this intoa  deb ian/patches format ins tead<j a yvee >  b ut de bian/pa t ch e s  ge tap pli ed an d dea ppl ied, bu t this cha nge  n eeds to stay ap plied forthe  sake of san ity 
<jayv ee > I ' m ina c atch- 22
<az e em_> I  see
<jay ve e > I'mt hinking m ay be f abrice_sp didn'tl oo k  too closely a t what  t h ep a tch  th e previous  m ainta i ner act u al l y did ,  so he didn't  realise th i s w asn'tasim p le fun ction al i tyfix.
<azeem _> o ne possib ly opt i on woul d  be tono run  py tho n se t up .p y c le a n
< a ze em_ >  no t*
<azee m_ >or to  hav e a seco ndtarg et, l ike "real-cle an" , wh i chdoesthe w ork<a zeem_ > andclean  d epends on first  rea l-clean a ndun pat ch  seco n d
<aze em_ > ( not sur e wheth e r t ha t w ou ld work)
<jayvee>I' m st arting t o thin k  t ha t  the pre vi ous  pac k a ger h ad t h is  in the. diff.g z  f or mat for  a  reaso n. 
<a zee m_> c o uldbe
<az eem_> ma ybe i n spect the chan g elog
<jayvee> no p e ,n othi nginteresting  int he l og
< j ay vee >  prev iouspa c ka g er was Paul Hummer<p aul@ub untu. com> so I pre sume he kn o w s  what he 's d i on g 
<jayvee> s/di ong/d oing/
<jay v ee> well  I'mgonna up load the. d i ff.gz, e xpl ain  my  di l e mm a, and I'll s e e  wha tfabrice _sp  says i n t hemor nin g<jayvee>it's 1:2 0AM ,an d I  need some zzz z' s
< bd mur ray>s iretar t`: s houl dth e  og mrip bu g  t a s k in  b ug  539 555  b e inv alid ? 
<u bottu>Launchpad  bu g  539 55 5in mpla yer "mencoder  c rashed wit hSIG SEGV i n x264_nal _encode()" [High,In pro g ress] h ttp s://l aunc hpad.net/ bug s/5395 55< sireta rt`> b dmurr ay : y e s 
<hgg d h >18<j oaopinto>h e ll<joao pi nto>  is the re a proper way fo r  pa ckage-foo tocha ngec o nf igf il e s i ns t all e d  by package-bar  without f or c in g the "con f igup grade"prompton pa c kage-ba r upgrade s?
<joaop in to>d p kg- divert?
<t hopiekar > hi.I'ma  memb e rof th e
<jayvee> but_I was_told by fabrice_sp that_I need_to_convert this_into_a debian/patches format_instead
<jayvee> but debian/patches_get applied and deapplied,_but this change_needs_to stay applied for the sake of sanity
<jayvee> I'm in a catch-22
<azeem_> I see
<jayvee>_I'm_thinking maybe_fabrice_sp_didn't_look too closely at what_the patch the previous maintainer_actually did,_so he didn't realise this wasn't a simple_functionality_fix.
<azeem_> one possibly_option would be to no run python setup.py clean
<azeem_>_not*
<azeem_> or to have a second_target, like "real-clean",_which_does_the work
<azeem_> and clean_depends on first real-clean and unpatch_second
<azeem_> (not sure whether that would_work)
<jayvee> I'm starting to think that the_previous packager had this in the.diff.gz_format for a reason.
<azeem_> could_be
<azeem_> maybe_inspect the changelog
<jayvee> nope, nothing_interesting in the_log
<jayvee> previous_packager was Paul_Hummer <paul@ubuntu.com> so I presume he_knows what he's_diong
<jayvee> s/diong/doing/
<jayvee> well I'm gonna upload_the.diff.gz,_explain my dilemma,_and_I'll_see what_fabrice_sp says in_the_morning
<jayvee> it's_1:20_AM, and I need some zzzz's
<bdmurray>_siretart`:_should the ogmrip bug task in bug_539555 be invalid?
<ubottu> Launchpad_bug_539555 in mplayer "mencoder_crashed with SIGSEGV in x264_nal_encode()"_[High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539555
<siretart`> bdmurray: yes
<hggdh> 18
<joaopinto>_hell
<joaopinto> is_there a_proper way for package-foo to change config files installed by package-bar_without forcing the "config upgrade" prompt_on package-bar upgrades?
<joaopinto> dpkg-divert?
<thopiekar>_hi.I'm a_member_of the