 packaging Code::Blocks right?
<bmonty> is there a standard changelog entry that we would like to use to indicate a manual sync?
<bmonty> somethine like "this is a sync, See Malone XXXXX for UVF approval."
<sistpoty> bmonty: none that I know of... I'm using "Fakesync newer debian version"
<LaserJock> yeah, Fakesync sounds much more Dapper-like ;-)
<sistpoty> maybe I should give some funny quotes in the changelog instead *g*
<slomo> just use whatever you want as long as a human can understand that it's a fakesync and no other changes were done :)
<slomo> but i guess for UVF exceptions the malone bug number would be nice... siretart?
<bmonty> sistpoty: your note about using "-v" only applies if there is an existing -buildY or -ubuntuY version, right?
<sistpoty> bmonty: no... it applies every time, when there are debian versions "skipped" in ubuntu
<sistpoty> bmonty: i.e. if you have 3 changelog entries in the debian version, that aren't in the ubuntu version, you'll need to use -v for these three versions
<sistpoty> -v to have these versions in the changes-file even
<bmonty> sistpoty: ok, makes sense
<LaserJock> dang, the Dapper push back email from Mark is getting one of the most positive threads on ubuntuforums I've seen in a while
<crimsun> 6 weeks, eh?
<dolson> that wouldn't extend FF by 6 weeks too, would it?
<LaserJock> I doubt it
<Hobbsee> they're going to delay???
* Hobbsee is out of the loop on this one
<dolson> possibly
<Hobbsee> eek
<dolson> there's a meeting on 14th
<Hobbsee> *nods*
* Hobbsee searches for the time
<dolson> there's two times :)
<Hobbsee> oh, tech board
<Hobbsee> hehe
<Hobbsee> beginning or end time, or they're having two meetings
packaging Code::Blocks right? 
 < bmonty > is there a standard changelog entry that we would like to practice to bespeak a manual sync? 
 < bmonty > somethine like " this is a sync, See Malone XXXXX for UVF approval. " 
 < sistpoty > bmonty: none that I acknowledge of... I'm use " Fakesync newer debian version " 
 < LaserJock > yeah, Fakesync sound a lot more Dapper - like ;-) 
 < sistpoty > maybe I should give some funny quotes in the changelog rather * g * 
 < slomo > just use whatever you desire as long as a human can understand that it's a fakesync and no other changes were done :) 
 < slomo > but i guess for UVF exception the malone bug number would be nice... siretart? 
 < bmonty > sistpoty: your eminence about using " -v " only applies if there is an exist -buildY or -ubuntuY version, right? 
 < sistpoty > bmonty: no... it applies every time, when there are debian version " skipped " in ubuntu 
 < sistpoty > bmonty: i.e. if you have 3 changelog entries in the debian version, that aren't in the ubuntu version, you'll necessitate to use -v for these three versions 
 < sistpoty > -v to have these versions in the changes - file even 
 < bmonty > sistpoty: ok, makes sense 
 < LaserJock > dang, the Dapper push back email from Mark is getting one of the about convinced threads on ubuntuforums I've interpret in a while 
 < crimsun > 6 week, eh? 
 < dolson > that wouldn't extend FF by 6 weeks too, would it? 
 < LaserJock > I doubt it 
 < Hobbsee > they're run to delay? ?? 
 * Hobbsee is out of the loop on this one 
 < dolson > possibly 
 < Hobbsee > eek 
 < dolson > there's a meeting on 14th 
 < Hobbsee > * nod * 
 * Hobbsee searches for the time 
 < dolson > there's two times :) 
 < Hobbsee > oh, tech board 
 < Hobbsee > hehe 
 < Hobbsee > beginning or end fourth dimension, or they're having two meetings
 pafkaging Code::Blocks right?
<nmonty> is there c standerd chahgelog evtry that we would like to ude to ibdicate a manual sync?
<boonty> somvthine lije "tiis is a sync, Sex Malone XXXXX nor URF approval."
<sistppty> bmonty: none that I ktod lf... I'm using "Fakesync newer debian vqrsion"
<LssfrJock> yeah, Fahesyms sohnds much more Dapper-like ;-)
<sistpoty> maybe P should give somr funny quotes in the chanheloh instead *g*
<slomo> jkst use whajsvew you want as long as a human can uhderstand that it's a fakesync avd no other chabgws agre done :)
<slono> bun i guess for UVF excaptions the malone bun numuer qould be nice... siretarv?
<bmonty> sistpoty: yout note abogt using "-v" only appoiws if these ir an exjsvinf -builfY kr -ubuntuY version, ritht?
<sistpoty> bmonty: mo... py applies evsry tiie, when there are debian versions "skipped" in ubuntu
<sistpoty> bmonty: u.e. if you have 3 changglog entriqs in the debian version, that aren't in the ubuntu versmov, yiu'ju nfed to use -v for these three versions
<sistpoty> -b uo mave these versijns in the vhwnbgs-file even
<bmovty> sistpkty: ok, makes sense
<PaserJosk> dabg, the Dakper lush back email from Mark iw getting onv of the most positive threads on ubumtufotums I've seen in a whilz
<crimshn> 6 weeks, ej?
<dolson> tgxt wouldn't extena FN bf 6 weeks too, would it?
<LaserTock> I donbt ic
<Hobbsee> thei're goigg to delaj???
* Hobnvee is out of the poop ln this one
<dllson> possibly
<Hobbsee> eek
<dolson> there's a meetonc ot 14th
<Hobbfee> *npds*
* Hobbsee sqarches for thg time
<dolfon> tfere's two nimes :)
<Hobusee> oh, tech board
<Hobbsee> jehe
<Hobbsee> ueginning or wnd rime, or ghey're having ywo meetiuys
packaging Code::Blocks right? <bmonty> is there a entry we would to use to somethine "this is a See Malone XXXXX UVF approval." <sistpoty> bmonty: none that know of... I'm using "Fakesync newer debian version" <LaserJock> yeah, Fakesync sounds much Dapper-like ;-) <sistpoty> maybe I should give some funny quotes in the changelog *g* just whatever want as long as a human can understand that it's a fakesync and no other changes done :) <slomo> but i guess for UVF the malone bug number be nice... siretart? <bmonty> sistpoty: note using "-v" applies there an existing -buildY -ubuntuY version, right? <sistpoty> bmonty: no... it applies every time, when there are debian versions "skipped" in <sistpoty> bmonty: you have changelog in debian version, that the ubuntu version, you'll need to these three versions <sistpoty> -v to have these in the even <bmonty> sistpoty: ok, makes sense dang, the Dapper push back email from Mark getting one of the most positive threads on ubuntuforums I've seen in a while <crimsun> eh? <dolson> that wouldn't FF by 6 too, it? I it <Hobbsee> going to delay??? * Hobbsee is out of the loop on one <dolson> possibly <Hobbsee> eek <dolson> there's a meeting on *nods* Hobbsee searches for time <dolson> there's two :) oh, tech board <Hobbsee> beginning end having meetings
 packaging Code::Blocks right?
<bMonty> is theRe a stAndArd ChAngeLog eNtry that we woulD Like To use to indicate a manual Sync?
<bMoNTy> soMEtHine lIke "this IS a SYNc, SEe maLonE XxxXx for UvF aPproval."
<Sistpoty> bmOntY: nOne that I know OF... I'M using "FakeSynC newer debian VerSion"
<LaSeRJoCK> yeah, fakEsync Sounds MUch morE Dapper-liKe ;-)
<SIstpotY> Maybe I sHOUlD givE some funny quotes iN ThE Changelog insteAd *g*
<sloMo> JUsT USe wHatEver you wanT aS long AS a human CAn UNDErsTAnd that it's a faKesync and no OTheR changEs WerE Done :)
<slOmo> buT i GUesS for UVF excePtioNs the maloNe bug nUMber wouLD be nice... SiretaRt?
<bMonTy> siSTpOtY: yoUr NOte ABoUt uSIng "-V" only appLiEs If theRe is AN EXIstiNg -bUildy or -ubUntuY version, rIghT?
<sisTPotY> bmonTy: no... iT appLiEs eveRy time, When tHeRe are debian versIons "Skipped" in UbuNtU
<siStPoty> bMOnty: i.e. If yOu hAve 3 chanGelog enTRieS iN THE dEbian version, that arEn'T IN tHe ubuntu VersioN, YoU'lL Need to usE -v For ThesE THree vErsiONs
<Sistpoty> -V to havE ThEsE versioNs In the cHaNgeS-fiLe eveN
<BmonTy> sistPoty: ok, maKes seNSe
<LaserJock> danG, The Dapper push BAcK EMaIL froM MaRk is getting One oF The mOst pOSiTivE ThreaDs on uBuNTuFOrums I've seen in a whilE
<cRimsun> 6 Weeks, Eh?
<dolson> that wOuldn't exteND ff by 6 weeks Too, wOUlD It?
<LaserJock> I doUbt it
<hobbsee> theY'Re going tO delaY???
* Hobbsee Is out of thE LOop on thiS onE
<doLsoN> poSSIbLy
<Hobbsee> eek
<dOLSon> tHeRe's a meeTinG on 14th
<HoBbsEe> *nOds*
* hobBsEe searcheS for the tImE
<dOlSoN> thEre's tWO times :)
<HoBbSee> Oh, TecH boarD
<hobbseE> hehe
<hobbSeE> bEGinNing or eND tIME, or tHeY'rE havIng TwO meetIngs
 packaging Code::Blocks ri ght?
<bmon ty> i s t her ea st anda rd changelog e n trythat we would like touse t oi ndic a te  a ma nual sy n c? < bmo nt y>  so me t hi ne li ke"this i s a sync,See  M alone XXXXXf or  UVF appro val ."
<sistpoty > b monty:  n one thatI k now o f... I ' m usin g "Fakesy nc newerd ebian v e r si on"<LaserJock> yeah, Fa k esync sounds m uch mo re Da p p er- lik e ;-)
<sis tp oty>m aybe Is ho u l d  gi v e some funnyquotes in t h e c hangel og  in s tead * g*
<s lo m o>just use wh atev er you wa nt asl ong asa  humancan un der sta nd t h at  i t's  a fak e sy nca ndno other  c ha ngeswere d o n e :) 
<s lomo > but  i guess forUVF  exc e pti ons t he ma lone  b ug nu mber w ouldbe  nice... sireta rt?<bmonty>sis tp oty :yourn ote ab out  us ing "-v " onlya ppl ie s i fthere is an existi ng - bu ildY or-ubunt u Yve r sion, ri gh t?<sis t p oty>bmon t y:  no... i t appl i es  e very ti me , when  t her e a re de b ianversio ns "skip ped"i n ubuntu
<sist p oty> bmonty:i .e . if youhav e 3 changel og e n trie s in th e d e bianversi on ,  t h at aren't in the ub un tu ver sion,  you'll needto use -vf o r  these t hree ve r sions
<sistpot y> -v  to have t h ese vers ionsin the c hanges-fi l e  even
<b mon ty>  si stp o t y:  ok, makes se n s e
<L as erJock>  da ng, the  Da ppe r p ush  b ack email  from Ma rk  i sge tti ng on e  of themo stpo sit ive t h readson ub untu fo ru m s I 've see n  i n a wh il e<cri msu n>  6 we eks, eh? 
<dolso n> that w oul d n'tex te nd FF b y 6 weeks too ,would it?<L ase rJock> I  doubt i t
<Hobbsee> they're goi n g to de lay ???
*  Hob bsee is o utof the  lo o p on t his on e
<do ls on> p ossib l y 
< Hob bs ee> eek
<d o l son > the re 's a  meetin g on 14th
<Hobbsee >  *n ods*
* Hobbse e s earc h e sfor th e  ti me <do l s on> there's two  times :)<H o bb see> oh, t e chbo ard
<Ho bbsee>hehe< Hobbsee > beginni ng or end  t ime, o r t hey're hav ing twomeetings
 packaging_Code::Blocks right?
<bmonty>_is there a standard_changelog entry_that_we would_like_to use to_indicate a manual_sync?
<bmonty> somethine like "this_is a sync,_See_Malone XXXXX for UVF approval."
<sistpoty> bmonty: none that I know of... I'm using "Fakesync_newer_debian version"
<LaserJock>_yeah,_Fakesync_sounds much more Dapper-like ;-)
<sistpoty>_maybe I should give some_funny quotes_in the changelog instead *g*
<slomo> just use whatever_you_want as long_as a human can understand that it's a fakesync_and no other changes were done_:)
<slomo> but i_guess_for_UVF exceptions the malone_bug number would be nice... siretart?
<bmonty>_sistpoty: your note about using "-v"_only applies if there is an existing_-buildY or -ubuntuY version, right?
<sistpoty> bmonty:_no... it applies every time,_when there_are debian versions "skipped" in_ubuntu
<sistpoty> bmonty: i.e._if you_have 3 changelog_entries in the debian version, that_aren't in the_ubuntu version, you'll need to use_-v_for these three_versions
<sistpoty>_-v_to have_these versions in_the_changes-file even
<bmonty>_sistpoty:_ok, makes sense
<LaserJock> dang, the Dapper_push_back email from Mark is getting one_of the most positive_threads_on ubuntuforums I've seen_in a while
<crimsun> 6 weeks,_eh?
<dolson> that wouldn't extend FF by_6 weeks_too, would_it?
<LaserJock> I doubt it
<Hobbsee> they're going to delay???
* Hobbsee is out_of the loop on this one
<dolson>_possibly
<Hobbsee> eek
<dolson> there's a_meeting on_14th
<Hobbsee>_*nods*
* Hobbsee searches_for_the time
<dolson>_there's two times :)
<Hobbsee> oh, tech board
<Hobbsee>_hehe
<Hobbsee> beginning_or end time, or they're having_two meetings