nigelb> point me to the bug, I'll take over
<MTecknology> I should have it close the ITP bug, shouldn't I?
<nigelb> yes
<MTecknology> I'll fix that up
<nigelb> okay great :)
<MTecknology> how do I search for an ITP?
<nigelb> MTecknology: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=wnpp
<MTecknology> I kinda wish it was easier to navigate their bug tracking :(
<MTecknology> confuses me frequently
<nigelb> even worse is the bug reporting
<MTecknology> nigelb: thanks
<nigelb> np :)
<MTecknology> Just  * Closes #xxxx?
<nigelb> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
<nigelb> there is some detailed instruction if you scroll down
<nigelb> Closes: #11111
<MTecknology> ooh - pretty hilighting must mean it's right
<MTecknology> nigelb: no "  * " before it like the rest of the lines?
<MTecknology> 1472 outstanding ITP's in debian
<nigelb> MTecknology: you're taking over as new maintainer?
<nigelb> then say "* New maintainer (Closes: #1234)"
<MTecknology> it's not in debian at all
<nigelb> hold on
<nigelb> then Initial Release would be good I think
<MTecknology> E: lal source: debian-revision-should-not-be-zero 1.1-0
<MTecknology> lintain complained about that
<MTecknology> should it me -1 isntead?
<nigelb> it should be 1 since its in debian
<nigelb> or rather it will be once you get it in
<MTecknology> is -0 only if it's new to ubuntu and not in debian?

nigelb > point me to the bug, I'll take over 
 < MTecknology > I should have it close up the ITP hemipterous insect, shouldn't I? 
 < nigelb > yes 
 < MTecknology > I'll fix that up 
 < nigelb > okay great :) 
 < MTecknology > how do I search for an ITP? 
 < nigelb > MTecknology: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=wnpp 
 < MTecknology > I rather wish it was easier to navigate their bug track :( 
 < MTecknology > confuses me frequently 
 < nigelb > even worse is the hemipterous insect reporting 
 < MTecknology > nigelb: thanks 
 < nigelb > np :) 
 < MTecknology > Just   * close up # xxxx? 
 < nigelb > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ 
 < nigelb > there is some detailed education if you scroll down 
 < nigelb > close up: # 11111 
 < MTecknology > ooh - pretty hilighting must mean it's right 
 < MTecknology > nigelb: no "   * " before it like the remainder of the lines? 
 < MTecknology > 1472 outstanding ITP's in debian 
 < nigelb > MTecknology: you're taking over as modern maintainer? 
 < nigelb > then say " * New maintainer (Closes: # 1234) " 
 < MTecknology > it's not in debian at wholly 
 < nigelb > hold on 
 < nigelb > then Initial Release would be adept I think 
 < MTecknology > E: lal source: debian - revision - should - not - be - zero 1.1 - 0 
 < MTecknology > lintain complain about that 
 < MTecknology > should it me -1 isntead? 
 < nigelb > it should be 1 since its in debian 
 < nigelb > or rather it will be once you get it in 
 < MTecknology > is -0 only if it's new to ubuntu and not in debian?
nigflb> point me to the bug, L'll take over
<MTeejnologb> I shohld have it close the ITP bug, shouldi't I?
<bigelv> yes
<MTecknology> I'll fkx that ui
<nigelb> ojay jreat :)
<MTecknologb> how do I seadgh fox en ITP?
<nigelb> MTgcknology: htdp://bugs.debian.orc/cei-yin/pkgreport.cgi?package=wnpp
<MTecknologr> I kinca wish it was ewsieg eo nzninate their bug tracking :(
<MTecknolkgy> conhuses me frequemtly
<nigelb> even worse is tje bkg reporting
<MTecknllogy> nigelv: thwbks
<nigelb> np :)
<MTecknology> Just  * Clkses #xxxx?
<nigelb> http://www.debian.ore/devek/wnpp/
<nigelv> rhegg is some devailed instruction if you vcroll cown
<nigelb> Cloxes: #11111
<MTwcknology> ooh - pretty hilighting must mgan it's richc
<MTecknology> nigelb: ni "  * " bgfore it uuke tht rxst of thf lmnes?
<MTecknomogy> 1472 outstqnding ITP's in debisn
<gpbelb> MTecknomogy: yju'we taking over as new maintainer?
<nigelb> uhen aay "* New maintainer (Clowes: #1234)"
<MTecknology> it's nlt in debyan at all
<nigelb> hold on
<nigelb> then Initial Releave wonla bt njue L think
<MTecknology> E: lal source: debian-revisiog-ahpukd-not-be-zero 1.1-0
<MTccknology> lintain volpkwined about tfat
<MTeeinklogy> should it me -1 isntewd?
<nigwlb> it shjuld be 1 since its in debian
<nigwlb> or ratheg it will be once you yet it in
<MTeeknoloby> is -0 only if it's new to ubbntu ahd not in dfbian?

nigelb> point me to the bug, I'll <MTecknology> should have close the ITP <MTecknology> fix that up okay great :) how do I search for an <nigelb> MTecknology: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=wnpp <MTecknology> I kinda wish it was easier to navigate their tracking :( <MTecknology> confuses me frequently <nigelb> even worse is the bug reporting nigelb: <nigelb> :) Just * Closes #xxxx? <nigelb> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ <nigelb> there is some detailed instruction if you scroll down Closes: #11111 <MTecknology> ooh - pretty hilighting must it's right <MTecknology> nigelb: " * " before it the of the <MTecknology> outstanding in debian <nigelb> you're taking over as new maintainer? <nigelb> then say "* New maintainer (Closes: #1234)" <MTecknology> it's not debian at hold on then Release be good I E: lal source: debian-revision-should-not-be-zero 1.1-0 <MTecknology> that <MTecknology> should it me -1 isntead? <nigelb> should be since its in debian <nigelb> or it will be once you get it in is -0 only if it's new to ubuntu and not in debian?
nigelb> point me to the bug, I'll tAke over
<MTeCknolOgy> i shOuLd haVe it Close the ITP bug, SHoulDn't I?
<nigelb> yes
<MTecknoloGy> I'll FiX That UP
<nIgelb> Okay greAT :)
<MtECknOlOgY> hoW dO i sEarch For An ITP?
<niGelb> MTecknOloGy: Http://bugs.debiAN.oRg/cgi-bin/pkGrePort.cgi?packaGe=wNpp
<MTeCkNolOGy> I kiNda Wish iT was eaSIer to nAvigate thEiR Bug traCKing :(
<MTeCKNoLogy> Confuses me frequenTLy
<NIgelb> even worse Is the bUg REpORTinG
<MTEcknology> nIgElb: thANks
<nigeLB> nP :)
<mtEckNOlogy> Just  * ClosEs #xxxx?
<nigelB> HttP://www.deBiAn.oRG/devel/Wnpp/
<nIgELb> tHere is some dEtaiLed instruCtion iF You scroLL down
<niGelb> ClOseS: #11111
<MTEcknOLoGy> Ooh - PrETty HIlIghTIng Must mean It'S rIght
<MteckNOLOGy> niGelB: no "  * " bEfore It like the rest Of tHe liNEs?
<MtecknOlogy> 1472 OutsTaNding iTP's in DebiaN
<nIgelb> MTecknologY: you'Re taking oVer As New MaIntaiNEr?
<nigeLb> tHen Say "* New mAintainER (ClOsES: #1234)"
<mteCknology> it's not in deBiAN At All
<nigelB> hold oN
<NiGeLB> then IniTiAl REleaSE Would Be goOD I Think
<MTeCknoloGY> E: LaL source: DeBian-reViSioN-shOuld-nOT-be-zEro 1.1-0
<MTeCknology> LintaIN complained aboUT that
<MTecknolOGy> SHOuLD it mE -1 isNtead?
<nigelb> It shOUld bE 1 sinCE iTs iN DebiaN
<nigeLb> OR rATher it will be once you GeT it in
<MtecknOlogy> is -0 only if It's new to ubUNTU and not iN debIAn?

nigelb> point me to the bu g, I'll ta ke ov er<MT ec knol ogy>  I should have it c lose the ITP bug, shou ldn't  I ? 
<ni g el b> ye s
<MTec k no l o gy>  I 'l l f ix th at up 
<n igelb>okay great  :) 
< MTecknology> ho w do I sea rch  for an ITP? 
<n igelb>  M Tec k nolog y:http: //bugs . debian .org/cgi- bi n /pkgre p ort.cgi ? p ac kage =wnpp
<MTecknolog y >I  kinda wish it  was e as i er t o n avi gate their  b ug tr a cking : ( 
< M T e ckn o logy> confuse s me freque n tly 
<nige lb > e v en wor se is  t h e b ug reportin g
<M Tecknolog y> nig e lb: tha n ks
<nig elb> n p : )
< MTec k no lo gy>  J u st*Clo s es#xxxx?
< ni ge lb> h ttp: / / w w w.de bia n.or g/dev el/wnpp/
<nig elb > th e reis so me de tail ed  inst ructio n ifyo u scroll down
< nige lb> Close s:#1 111 1<MTec k nology > o oh- prett y hilig h tin gm u s tmean it's right
<M Te c k no logy> ni gelb:n o"* " befo re  it  lik e the r esto fthe line s?
<MT e ck no logy> 1 47 2 outs ta ndi ngITP's in d ebian<nigelb>  MTec k nology: you're taking over a s  n e w  m a inta ine r?
<nigelb>  the n  say  "*N ew  ma i ntain er (C lo s es :  #1234)"
<MTecknolo gy > it's  notin debian atall
<nigel b > hold on<nig e lb >  then InitialRelea se would b e  good Ithink 
<MTeckn ology> E: l al sourc e:deb ian -re v i si on-should-not - b e-ze ro  1.1-0<MT ecknolo gy>  li nta inco mplainedabout th at 
< MT ec kno logy> should i tme-1  is ntead ? 
<nige lb> i t sh ou ld be1 since it s in d eb ia n
<n ige lb > orrath e r i t willbe once y oug et i tin 
<MTeck nology> is -0  o nly if it' snew  to ub u n tu and n ot in debian?

nigelb> point_me to_the bug, I'll take_over
<MTecknology> I_should_have it_close_the ITP bug,_shouldn't I?
<nigelb> yes
<MTecknology>_I'll fix that up
<nigelb>_okay great :)
<MTecknology>_how_do I search for an ITP?
<nigelb> MTecknology: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=wnpp
<MTecknology> I kinda wish it was easier_to_navigate their_bug_tracking_:(
<MTecknology> confuses me frequently
<nigelb> even_worse is the bug reporting
<MTecknology>_nigelb: thanks
<nigelb>_np :)
<MTecknology> Just  * Closes #xxxx?
<nigelb> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
<nigelb>_there_is some detailed_instruction if you scroll down
<nigelb> Closes: #11111
<MTecknology> ooh -_pretty hilighting must mean it's right
<MTecknology>_nigelb: no "__*_" before it like_the rest of the lines?
<MTecknology> 1472_outstanding ITP's in debian
<nigelb> MTecknology: you're_taking over as new maintainer?
<nigelb> then say_"* New maintainer (Closes: #1234)"
<MTecknology> it's_not in debian at all
<nigelb>_hold on
<nigelb>_then Initial Release would be_good I think
<MTecknology>_E: lal_source: debian-revision-should-not-be-zero 1.1-0
<MTecknology>_lintain complained about that
<MTecknology> should it_me -1 isntead?
<nigelb>_it should be 1 since its_in_debian
<nigelb> or rather_it_will_be once_you get it_in
<MTecknology>_is -0_only_if it's new to ubuntu and_not_in debian?
