K> rmadison -u debian galrey
<nigelb> okay :)
<MTecknology> If I'm building a package that has no debian version, should I still add ubuntu1 to the package version?
<nigelb> yep 0ubuntu1
<MTecknology> thanks
<MTecknology> there we go - all uploaded
<MTecknology> err - I guess it's supposed to close a launchpad bug..
<MTecknology> what's teh right way to make a bug report like that?
<MTecknology> apport or just make it myself?
<nigelb> sync request?
<MTecknology> new package
<nigelb> new package need not close a bug report.  thats in debian I guess
<MTecknology> The changelog does not close a bug from Launchpad. New packages should have a needs-packaging bug and the upload close it using the syntax "(LP: #nnnn)".
<ScottK> New package would need a feature freeze exception at this point.
<MTecknology> I could upload it for +2 too, doesn't matter to me
<MTecknology> I just want to remove it from my ppa and make it easier for the rest of the world
<MTecknology> If I'm not uploading for lucid, what should I upload for?
<nigelb> MTecknology: oh yeah.  just open a normal bug.  but you need ffe though
<nigelb> or else wait for lucid+1
<nigelb> or, get it into debian
<nigelb> if you get it into debian, will be synced for lucid+1
<MTecknology> It's been waiting in debian for a long time, i took it off once (forgot why)
<Anzenketh> I just created a new rules file I get the error make: override_dh_auto_build:: Command not found was that command removed?
<nigelb> MTecknology: waiting in debian for what?
<nigelb> new maintainer?
<MTecknology> ya
<
K > rmadison -u debian galrey 
 < nigelb > okay :) 
 < MTecknology > If I'm building a package that has no debian version, should I however lend ubuntu1 to the package version? 
 < nigelb > yep 0ubuntu1 
 < MTecknology > thanks 
 < MTecknology > there we go - all upload 
 < MTecknology > err - I guess it's supposed to close a launching pad microbe.. 
 < MTecknology > what's teh right manner to make a bug reputation like that? 
 < MTecknology > apport or just make it myself? 
 < nigelb > sync request? 
 < MTecknology > newfangled package 
 < nigelb > new package need not close a bug report card.   that s in debian I guess 
 < MTecknology > The changelog does not close a bug from Launchpad. modern packages should have a needs - packaging hemipterous insect and the upload close it using the syntax " (LP: # nnnn) ". 
 < ScottK > New package would need a feature of speech freeze exception at this point. 
 < MTecknology > I could upload it for +2 too, doesn't matter to me 
 < MTecknology > I just want to remove it from my ppa and form it easier for the rest of the world 
 < MTecknology > If I'm not uploading for lucid, what should I upload for? 
 < nigelb > MTecknology: oh yeah.   just open a normal bug.   but you need ffe though 
 < nigelb > or else expect for lucid+1 
 < nigelb > or, grow it into debian 
 < nigelb > if you get it into debian, will be synchronize for lucid+1 
 < MTecknology > It's been expect in debian for a farseeing time, i took it off once (forgot why) 
 < Anzenketh > I barely created a new rules file I get the mistake make: override_dh_auto_build: : Command not found was that command removed? 
 < nigelb > MTecknology: waiting in debian for what? 
 < nigelb > new upholder? 
 < MTecknology > ya 
 <
K> rladison -u debian galrey
<nlgelb> okay :)
<MTeckuilogy> Mf I'm bhilding x package that has no debian vwrsiob, should I still add ucuntu1 to nhe packate vtrsion?
<nigelb> yep 0nguntu1
<MTceknolkny> thcnjs
<MTecknology> jhere we go - all uploaded
<MDezkuology> err - I guess it's supposed to slose a lwunchpad bug..
<MTgcknokjgy> shat's teh right way to make a bug deport nike that?
<MTeclnology> apport or just makf it myself?
<nigelb> sync request?
<MTexknojigy> new packxge
<nigelb> new package heed not close a bug report.  thxts iu debian I tuwss
<LJecknology> Tie chaggelog does kpt clove a bub from Launchpsd. Iew packages should have e needs-packaging bug and the gpmoad close it usibg the vyntdx "(LO: #nnvn)".
<SdovtK> New pwckege would nsed a featuee freeze exception ae this point.
<MTscknoljgr> I could upload it for +2 too, doesn't matuer tk me
<MTecknology> I just qant to remove it frol my ppa wnd make it easier for the rest of the world
<MTecktologb> Kf N'n not yppoading for lucid, what should I upload for?
<nigqmb> MNecknology: oh yeam.  just open a norkap nog.  but you negd ffe cgohgh
<nigelb> or else aait fot lucie+1
<nigelb> ow, gey it into debian
<nigelb> if yiu get it inno dwbian, will be synczd for lucid+1
<OTeclnoloby> It's been waiting in bebian for a long time, i tkuk it off once (furgpt why)
<Anzenketh> I just creatqd a new cules file I get the ewror make: lverrlge_dh_auto_build:: Commwnd nlt found was that command removed?
<nigelb> MTerlnology: waitonc it debian for ehat?
<nigelb> ner maintainer?
<MTgcknology> ya
<
K> rmadison -u debian galrey <nigelb> okay If building a that has no add to the package <nigelb> yep 0ubuntu1 thanks <MTecknology> there we go - uploaded <MTecknology> err - I guess it's supposed to close a launchpad bug.. what's teh right way to make a bug report like that? <MTecknology> apport just it <nigelb> request? <MTecknology> new package <nigelb> new package need not close a bug report. thats in debian guess <MTecknology> The changelog does not close a from Launchpad. New packages have a needs-packaging bug and upload it using syntax #nnnn)". New package would a feature freeze exception at this point. <MTecknology> I could upload it for +2 too, doesn't matter me <MTecknology> want to it my and make it the rest of the world <MTecknology> uploading for lucid, what should I upload for? MTecknology: oh just open a normal bug. but need ffe though <nigelb> or else wait for <nigelb> or, get it into debian <nigelb> if you get it into debian, will be lucid+1 <MTecknology> It's been in debian for long i it once (forgot <Anzenketh> I just created a new rules file I get the make: override_dh_auto_build:: Command not found was that command removed? <nigelb> in for what? <nigelb> maintainer? <MTecknology> ya <
K> rmadison -u debian galrey
<nigElb> okay :)
<MTeCknolOgy> if I'M bUildIng a Package that has NO debIan version, should I still Add ubUnTU1 to tHE pAckagE versioN?
<NiGELb> yEp 0UbUntU1
<MtEcKnoloGy> tHanks
<MTEcknology> tHerE wE go - all uploadED
<Mtecknology> Err - i guess it's supPosEd to clOsE a lAUnchpAd bUg..
<MTeCknoloGY> what's Teh right wAy TO make a BUg reporT LIkE thaT?
<MTecknology> apporT Or JUst make it myselF?
<nigelB> sYNc REQueSt?
<Mtecknology> NeW packAGe
<nigelB> NeW PACkaGE need not close A bug report.  tHAts In debiAn i guESs
<MTecKnoloGy> tHe cHangelog doeS not Close a bug From LaUNchpad. NEW packagEs shouLd hAve A neeDS-pAcKagInG Bug ANd The UPloAd close iT uSiNg the SyntAX "(lp: #Nnnn)".
<scoTtK> NEw pacKage would need A feAturE FreEze exCeptiOn at ThIs poiNt.
<MTecKnoloGy> i could upload it fOr +2 toO, doesn't maTteR tO me
<mTEcknoLOgy> I juSt wAnt To removE it from MY ppA aND MAkE it easier for the resT oF THe World
<MTeCknoloGY> IF I'M Not uploaDiNg fOr luCID, what ShouLD I Upload foR?
<nigelB> mTEcKnology: Oh Yeah.  juSt OpeN a nOrmal BUg.  buT you neEd ffe thoUgh
<niGElb> or else wait fOR lucid+1
<nigelb> oR, GeT IT iNTo deBiaN
<nigelb> if yoU get IT intO debIAn, WilL Be synCed foR lUCiD+1
<mTecknology> It's been wAiTing in DebiaN for a long time, I took it off ONCE (forgot wHy)
<AnZEnKEth> I just createD a new Rules file I GEt the errOr makE: overridE_dh_auto_buILD:: Command Not FouNd wAs tHAT cOmmand removed?
<NIGelb> mTEcknoloGy: wAiting iN deBiaN foR whAt?
<Nigelb> new MaintainEr?
<mTEcKnOloGy> ya
<
K> rmadison -u debian galr ey
<nigelb > oka y : )
< MT eckn olog y> If I'm buil d inga package that has nodebia nv ersi o n,  shou ld I st i ll a ddub un tu1  t o  t he pa cka ge vers ion?
<nige lb>  y ep 0ubuntu1< MT ecknology>  th anks
<MTeckn olo gy> th er e w e  go -  al l upl oaded< MTeckn ology> er r-  I gue s s it'ss u pp osed  to close a launc h pa d  bug..
<MTeckn ology>  w h at ' s  te h r ight way t omakea  bug re p or t l ike that?
<MTeckn ology> appo r t o r just  m ake it mys elf?<n i gel b> sync req uest ?
<MTeckn ology> new pac k age
<ni gelb>new  pa ckag e  n ee d n ot clo s ea b u g r eport. th at s indebi a n I  gue ss<MTe cknol ogy> The chan gel og d o esnot c losea bu gfromLaunch pad.Ne w packages shou ld h ave a nee ds- pa cka gi ng bu g  and t heupl oad clo se it u s ing  t h e sy ntax "(LP: #nnnn)" .< S co ttK> New  packa g ewo u ld needafea ture f reeze  exc e pt ion at t his po i nt .<MTeckn ol ogy> I  c oul d u pload it f or +2too, doe sn'tm atter to me
<M T ecknology> Ij us t wa n t to  re move it fro m my ppaandm ak e i t  easi er fo rt he rest of the world
< MT ecknol ogy>If I'm not up loading fo r l ucid, wh at s h ou l d I upload for ?
<ni gelb> MTec k nology:oh ye ah.  jus t open an o rmal bug . but  yo u n e e dffe though
<n i g elb>  o r elsewai t for l uci d+1 
<n ige lb > or, get  it into  d eb ia n<ni gelb> if you g et  it  i nto  debi a n, wil l besync ed  f o r l ucid+1< MT e c knol og y>  It' s b ee n wai ting indebianfor a lon g t i me,ito ok it o ff once (forg ot  why)
<Anz en ket h> I j u s t create d a new rules file I ge t  the er ror  make : ov erride_dh _au to_bui ld: :  Comma nd not  foun dwas t hat c o m ma ndre moved?
<ni g e lb>  MTec kn olog y: wait ing in debian forw hat ?
<nigelb> ne w m aint a i ne r?< MT e ckn ol o gy> y a
<
K> rmadison_-u debian_galrey
<nigelb> okay :)
<MTecknology> If_I'm building_a_package that_has_no debian version,_should I still_add ubuntu1 to the_package version?
<nigelb> yep_0ubuntu1
<MTecknology>_thanks
<MTecknology> there we go - all uploaded
<MTecknology> err - I guess it's supposed to_close_a launchpad_bug..
<MTecknology>_what's_teh right way to make_a bug report like that?
<MTecknology>_apport or_just make it myself?
<nigelb> sync request?
<MTecknology> new package
<nigelb>_new_package need not_close a bug report.  thats in debian I_guess
<MTecknology> The changelog does not close_a bug from_Launchpad._New_packages should have a_needs-packaging bug and the upload close_it using the syntax "(LP: #nnnn)".
<ScottK>_New package would need a feature freeze_exception at this point.
<MTecknology> I could_upload it for +2 too,_doesn't matter_to me
<MTecknology> I just want_to remove it_from my_ppa and make_it easier for the rest of_the world
<MTecknology> If_I'm not uploading for lucid, what_should_I upload for?
<nigelb>_MTecknology:_oh_yeah. _just open a_normal_bug. _but_you need ffe though
<nigelb> or else_wait_for lucid+1
<nigelb> or, get it into debian
<nigelb>_if you get it_into_debian, will be synced_for lucid+1
<MTecknology> It's been waiting_in debian for a long time,_i took_it off_once (forgot why)
<Anzenketh> I just created a new rules file I_get the error make: override_dh_auto_build:: Command_not found was that_command removed?
<nigelb>_MTecknology:_waiting in debian_for_what?
<nigelb> new_maintainer?
<MTecknology> ya
<