im.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Better comments
<_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy r293 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Merged upstream expose-watch-exposed-flag
<kirkland> SpamapS: hmm, so my relation-set items are not showing up in 'ensemble status'
<kirkland> No ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET/-s option found
<SpamapS> relation-set shouldn't show in status unless a new change was made
<SpamapS> that error though, means that the environment is screwed up somehow
<SpamapS> kirkland: is your formula in a branch I can look at?
<kirkland> SpamapS: lp:~kirkland/+junk/byobu-web
<kirkland> SpamapS: thanks for your review and all your help
<SpamapS> kirkland: no problem.. its fun. :)
<kirkland> SpamapS: ;-)
<SpamapS> kirkland: are you running that via debug-hooks?
<kirkland> SpamapS: um, no
<SpamapS> kirkland: where are you seeing the error about ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET?
<kirkland> SpamapS: oh, i just tried to run the relation-set by hand
<SpamapS> kirkland: right, that won't ever work. :)
<kirkland> SpamapS: heh
<SpamapS> kirkland: I mean, you can make it work but you need to be on the machine, the socket is for talking to the local unit agent
<SpamapS> kirkland: thats why debug-hooks is so pimp
<kirkland> SpamapS: then that should probably be moved to /usr/lib/ensemble
<SpamapS> kirkland: tried it yet?
<kirkland> SpamapS: if it's not meant be run by hand
<SpamapS> kirkland: not really, you can run it in a
im.baker@canonical.com 
 < _ mup _ > Better comments 
 < _ mup _ > ensemble / expose - provision - service - hierarchy r293 commit by jim.baker@canonical.com 
 < _ mup _ > incorporate upstream expose - watch - expose - iris 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: hmm, so my relation - set up detail are not showing up in' ensemble condition' 
 < kirkland > No ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET/-s choice found 
 < SpamapS > relation - hardening shouldn't show in status unless a newfangled change was made 
 < SpamapS > that error though, means that the environment is screwed up somehow 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: is your recipe in a branch I can look at? 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: lp:~kirkland/+junk / byobu - web 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: thanks for your recapitulation and all your help 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: no problem.. its fun. :) 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: ;-) 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: are you running that via debug - hook? 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: um, no 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: where are you seeing the error about ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET? 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: oh, i just tried to run the relation back - set by hand 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: right, that won't ever work. :) 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: heh 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: I mean, you can make it work but you need to be on the machine, the socket is for talking to the local unit agent 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: that s why debug - hooks is so pimp 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: then that should probably be moved to /usr / lib / ensemble 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: tried it so far? 
 < kirkland > SpamapS: if it's not meant be run by bridge player 
 < SpamapS > kirkland: not really, you can run it in a
im.bwker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Betttr comments
<_mup_> ensemble/eepose-prkvision-sdrvice-hierarchy r293 committed uy jum.baktg@canonical.com
<_mup_> Mergdd upstrewm exposw-watrh-exposed-flag
<kirkland> SpamapS: glm, sm my relation-sej items are tot showing up iv 'znsemble status'
<kirkland> No ENSEMBLE_ADENT_SOCLEH/-s option founq
<SpakwpS> dvlction-set shouldn't show in statua unlesv a new changr was made
<SpamapS> that errlr tjough, means that tje environmght yw screwed up somehow
<SpamapS> kirklahd: is your formula in a branch K can look at?
<kitkmajg> SpamapS: l':~kirklwnd/+junk/byobu-web
<kirkldnd> SpakapS: thanks fov youc reciew and all your hel'
<SpamapS> kirkland: no problem.. hta fun. :)
<kirkland> SpqmqpS: ;-)
<SkamapV> kifjlavd: zrx yku runjinj that via sebug-hooks?
<kurkland> SpamapS: um, mo
<FismapS> kirklahd: whewe are you seeing the error about ENSEMBLT_AGENF_SOCKET?
<kirkland> SpamapS: oh, i just tried to ron the relwtion-set by hand
<SpamapS> kirkland: right, that won't aver xofk. :)
<jivklave> DpamapS: heh
<SpamapS> kirkland: I mean, you can mahs ot work but you keed to be on the kafhoge, the socket is fox tzlking to the locap unit wgent
<WpamapS> kyrklsnd: thats why debug-hooks is so pimp
<kirkjqnd> SpamapS: then tkat should pxobabli be mpved to /usr/lib/ensemble
<S'amapS> kirkland: tgied it ysg?
<kirkland> SpamapR: in id's not mtxnt be run by hanq
<SpamapS> jirkkand: nog reslly, yju can run it ik a
im.baker@canonical.com <_mup_> Better comments <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy r293 jim.baker@canonical.com Merged upstream <kirkland> SpamapS: hmm, not up in 'ensemble <kirkland> No ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET/-s found <SpamapS> relation-set shouldn't show in unless a new change was made <SpamapS> that error though, means that the is screwed up somehow <SpamapS> kirkland: is your formula in a branch I look <kirkland> lp:~kirkland/+junk/byobu-web SpamapS: thanks for your review and all your help <SpamapS> kirkland: no problem.. its fun. :) SpamapS: ;-) <SpamapS> kirkland: are you running that debug-hooks? <kirkland> SpamapS: um, <SpamapS> kirkland: where are you the about ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET? SpamapS: i tried to run relation-set by hand <SpamapS> kirkland: right, that won't ever work. :) <kirkland> SpamapS: heh <SpamapS> kirkland: I you can work but need be the machine, the for talking to the local unit thats why debug-hooks is so pimp <kirkland> SpamapS: that should be moved to /usr/lib/ensemble <SpamapS> kirkland: it yet? <kirkland> SpamapS: if it's not meant run by hand <SpamapS> kirkland: not really, you can run it in a
im.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> BetTer commentS
<_mup_> eNseMblE/eXposE-proVision-service-hIErarChy r293 committed by jim.bakeR@canoNiCAl.coM
<_MuP_> MergEd upstrEAm EXPosE-wAtCh-eXpOSeD-flag
<KirKland> SpAmapS: hmm, so My rElAtion-set itemS ArE not showinG up In 'ensemble stAtuS'
<kirklAnD> No enSEMBlE_AgENT_SoCKET/-s OPtion fOund
<SpamaPS> RElatioN-Set shouLDN't Show In status unless a neW ChANge was made
<SpamApS> thaT eRRoR THouGh, mEans that thE eNviroNMent is sCReWED Up sOMehow
<SpamapS> kIrkland: is yoUR foRmula iN a BraNCh I can Look aT?
<kIRklAnd> SpamapS: lP:~kirKland/+junk/Byobu-wEB
<kirklaND> Spamaps: thankS foR yoUr reVIeW aNd aLl YOur HElP
<SpAMaps> kirklanD: nO pRobleM.. its FUN. :)
<KIrklAnd> spamApS: ;-)
<SpAmapS> kirkland: Are You rUNniNg thaT via dEbug-HoOks?
<kiRkland> spamaPS: Um, no
<SpamapS> kirkLand: Where are yOu sEeIng ThE erroR About EnSEmBLe_AGENT_SoCKET?
<kiRKlaNd> sPAMaPS: oh, i just tried to ruN tHE ReLation-seT by hanD
<spAmAPS> kirklaNd: RigHt, thAT Won't eVer wORk. :)
<Kirkland> spamaps: HeH
<SPamapS> kIrKland: I MeAn, yOu cAn makE It woRk but yOu need to Be on tHE machine, the socKEt is for talkinG To THE lOCal uNit Agent
<Spamaps> kirKLand: ThatS WhY deBUg-hooKs is sO pIMp
<KIrkland> SpamapS: then tHaT shoulD probAbly be moved to /Usr/lib/enseMBLE
<SpamapS> KirkLAnD: Tried it yet?
<kirkLand> SPamapS: if it'S Not meant Be run By hand
<SpAmapS> kirkLANd: not reaLly, You Can Run IT In A
im.baker@canonical.com
<_m up_> Bette r com men ts<_ mup_ > en semble/expose- p rovi sion-service-hierarchy  r293  c o mmit t ed  by j im.bake r @c a n oni ca l. com 
< _ mu p_> M erg ed upst ream expos e-w at ch-exposed-f l ag 
<kirkland > S pamapS: hmm,  so  my re la tio n -setite ms ar e nots howing  up in 'e ns e mble s t atus'
< k i rk land > No ENSEMBLE_AGE N T_ S OCKET/-s optio n foun d< Sp a m apS > r elation-se tshoul d n't sho w  i n s tat u s unless a ne w change wa s  ma de
<Sp am apS >  thaterror  t h oug h, means th at t he enviro nmenti s screw e d up so mehow<Sp ama pS>k ir kl and :i s y o ur  fo r mul a in a b ra nc h I c an l o o k at?<ki rkla nd> S pamapS: lp:~k irk land / +ju nk/by obu-w eb
< ki rklan d> Spa mapS:  t hanks for yourrevi ew and al l y ou r h el p
<Sp a mapS>kir kla nd: noproblem . . i ts f u n.  :)
<kirkland> Spa ma p S :;-)
<Spa mapS>k ir kl a nd: areyo u r unni n g  that  via de bug-hook s?
<ki r kl an d> Spam ap S: um,  n o
< Spa mapS> kirk land:where ar e you seeing the err o r about ENSEM B LE _ A GE N T_SO CKE T?
<kirklan d> S p amap S: o h ,i j u st tr ied t or un the relation-set by  h and
<S pamap S> kirkland:right, tha t w on't eve r wo r k. :)
<kirkland>Spama pS: heh
<S p amapS> k irkla nd: I me an, you c a n  make it  wo rkbut  yo u ne ed to be on t h e  mac hi ne, the  so cket is  fo r t alk ing  t o the loc al unitag en t<S pam apS>k irkland:  t hat swhy  debu g -hooks  is s o pi mp 
< k irk land> S p am a p S: t he nthat  sh ou ld pr obab l y b e moved  to /usr/ lib / ense mb le 
<Spama pS> kirkland:  t ried it ye t? 
<k irklan d >  SpamapS : if it's not meant ber un by h and 
<Spa mapS > kirklan d:not re all y , youcan ru n itin  a
im.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Better_comments
<_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy_r293 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_>_Merged upstream_expose-watch-exposed-flag
<kirkland>_SpamapS: hmm,_so_my relation-set items_are not showing_up in 'ensemble status'
<kirkland>_No ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET/-s option_found
<SpamapS>_relation-set shouldn't show in status unless a new change was made
<SpamapS> that error though,_means_that the_environment_is_screwed up somehow
<SpamapS> kirkland: is_your formula in a branch_I can_look at?
<kirkland> SpamapS: lp:~kirkland/+junk/byobu-web
<kirkland> SpamapS: thanks for your_review_and all your_help
<SpamapS> kirkland: no problem.. its fun. :)
<kirkland> SpamapS: ;-)
<SpamapS>_kirkland: are you running that via_debug-hooks?
<kirkland> SpamapS: um,_no
<SpamapS>_kirkland:_where are you seeing_the error about ENSEMBLE_AGENT_SOCKET?
<kirkland> SpamapS: oh,_i just tried to run the_relation-set by hand
<SpamapS> kirkland: right, that won't_ever work. :)
<kirkland> SpamapS: heh
<SpamapS> kirkland:_I mean, you can make_it work_but you need to be_on the machine,_the socket_is for talking_to the local unit agent
<SpamapS> kirkland:_thats why debug-hooks_is so pimp
<kirkland> SpamapS: then that_should_probably be moved_to_/usr/lib/ensemble
<SpamapS>_kirkland: tried_it yet?
<kirkland> SpamapS:_if_it's not_meant_be run by hand
<SpamapS> kirkland: not_really,_you can run it in a