 a bug to attach the rebuilt debdiff too, i suppose i create that against the source package i am rebuilding? Any particular format to create tat bug with?
<Laney> just give it a decent title and description and attach the debdiff
<Laney> make sure it closes that bug
<mcnicholls> so i am looking at rebuilding libddm-1-0 to build against libempathy22 instead of 19. So in the desktop-data-model source package i just create a bug something like "libddm-1-0 rebuild to remove libempathy19 dependancy" and attach my debdiff?
<Laney> yep
<mcnicholls> and if i have the LP# in the change log then it will close it on build won't it?
<Laney> * rebuild for foo (LP: #xxxxx)
<mcnicholls> thats the one
<mcnicholls> thanks. thats a lot of questions, but want to get it right as these are the first things i have submitted
<Laney> no worries, it's good to ask
<mcnicholls> and if i subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsorship then some should come along and pick it up? or do i need to do more than that?
<ryanakca> Could someone take a look at bug 343380 please?
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 343380 in slingshot "Please sync slingshot 0.8.1p-2 from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343380
<nhandler> ryanakca: I'll take a look
<Adri2000> ryanakca: why was the bug confirmed while not acked?
#ubuntu-motu 2010-03-15
<persia> ScottK: crimsun: This hasn't beeen *the* place to ask packaging questions (but rather one of many) since community-lucid-motu was approved "Developer Training: distribute".  This is still *a* place for packaging questions.  #ubuntu-packaging is mostly for new packaging, PPA packaging, derivative packaging, etc. but similarly won't not answer questions about other things (although at least I'll redirect when soemthing is clearly about Ubuntu proc
<persia> esses or
a bug to attach the rebuilt debdiff too, i suppose i make that against the generator package i am rebuilding? Any particular format to produce tat bug with? 
 < Laney > merely give it a decent championship and description and attach the debdiff 
 < Laney > make certain it closes that bug 
 < mcnicholls > then i am look at rebuilding libddm-1 - 0 to build against libempathy22 instead of 19. So in the desktop - datum - model source package i precisely create a bug something like " libddm-1 - 0 rebuild to get rid of libempathy19 dependancy " and attach my debdiff? 
 < Laney > yep 
 < mcnicholls > and if i experience the LP # in the change log then it will close it on build won't it? 
 < Laney > * rebuild for foo (LP: # xxxxx) 
 < mcnicholls > that s the one 
 < mcnicholls > thanks. that s a lot of question, but want to get it right as these are the first things i have take 
 < Laney > no worries, it's good to ask 
 < mcnicholls > and if i subscribe ubuntu - universe - sponsorship then some should come along and pick it up? or do i need to do more than that? 
 < ryanakca > Could someone take a expression at bug 343380 please? 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 343380 in slingshot " Please synchronize slingshot 0.8.1p-2 from Debian fluid (independent) " [ Undecided, Confirmed ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343380 
 < nhandler > ryanakca: I'll consider a look 
 < Adri2000 > ryanakca: why was the bug confirmed while not acked? 
 # ubuntu - motu 2010 - 03 - 15 
 < persia > ScottK: crimsun: This hasn't beeen * the * place to necessitate packaging questions (but rather one of many) since community - lucid - motu was approved " Developer Training: distribute ".   This is still * a * place for packaging questions.   # ubuntu - packaging is mostly for newfangled packaging, PPA promotion, derivative promotion, etc. but similarly won't not suffice questions about other things (although at least I'll redirect when soemthing is clearly about Ubuntu proc 
 < persia > esses or
 a hug to attach the rebuilu debdiff too, i soppose i creats that aeainst the source package i em rwbuileing? Any particular fofmat to cgeate tat bug qith?
<Laney> ohst givc it z decznv title and desgription ang attach the dabaiyf
<Laney> make sure it closes that bug
<icnichokld> so i am lookyng se reglioding libddm-1-0 to build against libempethy22 instead of 19. So in the desktop-data-modfl slurce package i judt create a bug womething liye "libddm-1-0 gzbuild to rgmove libempathy19 dependancy" and xttack my debdifd?
<Lqnej> yep
<mcnichools> agd if i have the LP# hn the vhange log thek it xill close it on build woi't it?
<Laney> * rebuild sor foo (L[: #rxxxx)
<mcnicholls> thats tye ong
<mcniwholuw> tfanis. tgats a lov of questikns, but wanr to get it right ax eyese are the rirst ehyngs i have submitted
<Laney> no worries, iu's gokd to ask
<mcnicholls> and if i subscribe ubunto-universe-s[onsorship then some should come along and pick id up? kf di l nede ho do more than that?
<ryanakca> Could someone tahs s kook at bug 343380 pjease?
<ubottu> Lwumshpad bug 343380 in slingshof "Please sync slinhshot 0.8.1p-2 from Debian ugstanle (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchiad.nwt/bugs/343380
<nhandler> ryauakca: I'll taye a look
<Sdri2000> ryanakca: why was tke bug confirmed ahile not xcked?
#ubuntu-motu 2010-03-15
<oerxid> ScottK: crimsun: This hasn'e beeen *tie* plcce to ark psckagigg questiojs (bub rather one of manj) sinee cokmunity-lucld-motu was approved "Developer Tceining: distrinude".  This is stilk *a* place for packaging quextions.  #ubungu-packaginf is movtly for ner packaging, P[W packaging, verivativq paxkagung, etc. cut similarly eon't not cuswer quewtions about other thkhgs (although at leqst I'll redirecy wfen slektrhng is clearny acoug Ubungu proc
<kzrsla> dssex or
a bug to attach the rebuilt debdiff suppose create that the source package format create tat bug <Laney> just give a decent title and description and the debdiff <Laney> make sure it closes that bug <mcnicholls> so i am at rebuilding libddm-1-0 to build against libempathy22 instead of 19. So in the source i create bug something like "libddm-1-0 rebuild to remove libempathy19 dependancy" and attach my debdiff? <Laney> yep <mcnicholls> if i have the LP# in the change then it will close on build won't it? <Laney> rebuild foo (LP: <mcnicholls> the <mcnicholls> thanks. thats lot of questions, but want to get it right as these are the first things i have <Laney> no good to <mcnicholls> if subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsorship then come along and pick it up? need to do more than that? <ryanakca> Could take a at bug 343380 please? <ubottu> Launchpad 343380 in slingshot "Please sync slingshot 0.8.1p-2 from unstable (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343380 <nhandler> ryanakca: I'll take a look <Adri2000> ryanakca: why was the while not acked? #ubuntu-motu <persia> ScottK: crimsun: hasn't *the* to packaging questions rather one of many) since community-lucid-motu was approved "Developer Training: distribute". is still *a* place for packaging questions. #ubuntu-packaging is mostly packaging, packaging, derivative packaging, but similarly won't not questions other things (although at redirect soemthing Ubuntu <persia> or
 a bug to attach the rebuilt debDiff too, i suPpose I crEatE tHat aGainSt the source pacKAge i Am rebuilding? Any particuLar foRmAT to cREaTe tat Bug with?
<lAnEY> JusT gIvE it A dECeNt titLe aNd descrIption and aTtaCh The debdiff
<LaNEy> Make sure it CloSes that bug
<mcNicHolls> sO i Am lOOking At rEbuilDing liBDdm-1-0 to bUild againSt LIbempaTHy22 insteAD Of 19. so in The desktop-data-modEL sOUrce package i juSt creaTe A BuG SOmeThiNg like "libdDm-1-0 RebuiLD to remoVE lIBEMpaTHy19 dependancy" aNd attach my dEBdiFf?
<LaneY> yEp
<mCNicholLs> and If I HavE the LP# in the ChanGe log then It will CLose it oN Build woN't it?
<LaNey> * RebUild FOr FoO (LP: #XxXXx)
<mCNiChoLLs> tHats the oNe
<McNichoLls> tHANKS. thaTs a Lot oF quesTions, but want tO geT it rIGht As theSe are The fIrSt thiNgs i haVe subMiTted
<Laney> no worrIes, iT's good to aSk
<mCnIchOlLs> and IF i subsCriBe uBuntu-unIverse-sPOnsOrSHIP tHen some should come aLoNG AnD pick it uP? or do i NEeD tO Do more thAn ThaT?
<ryaNAKca> CoUld sOMeOne take a Look at BUg 343380 PlEase?
<uboTtU> LauncHpAd bUg 343380 iN slinGShot "please Sync slinGshot 0.8.1P-2 From Debian unstABle (main)" [UndeciDEd,cONfIRmed] HttPs://launchpad.Net/bUGs/343380
<nhAndlER> rYanAKca: I'lL take A lOOk
<aDri2000> ryanakca: why was thE bUg confIrmed While not acked?
#Ubuntu-motu 2010-03-15
<PERSia> Scottk: criMSuN: this hasn't beeen *The* plAce to ask paCKaging quEstioNs (but ratHer one of mANY) since coMmuNitY-luCid-MOTu Was approved "DeVELopeR TRaining: DisTribute".  thiS is StiLl *a* PlAce for pacKaging quEsTiOnS.  #uBunTu-pacKAging is mOsTly FoR neW packAGing, PPa packAginG, dErIVatIve packAGiNG, Etc. bUt SiMilaRly WoN't not AnswER quEstions About otheR thINgs (aLtHoUgh at leAst I'll redirecT wHen soemthiNg Is cLearly ABOut UbuntU proc
<persia> esses or
 a bug to attach the rebui lt debdiff  too,  isup po se i  cre ate that again s t th e source package i amrebui ld i ng?A ny  part icularf or m a t t ocr eat et at  bugwit h?
<Lan ey> just g ive  i t a decent t i tl e and desc rip tion and att ach  the d eb dif f 
<Lan ey>  make  surei t clos es that b ug <mcnic h olls> s o iam l ooking at rebuild i ng libddm-1-0 tobuildag a in s t  li bem pathy22 in st ead o f  19. So in t h e d e sktop-data-mo del sourcep ack age iju stc reatea bug  s o met hing like " libd dm-1-0 re buildt o remov e  libemp athy19  de pen danc y "an d a tt a chm ydeb d iff ?
<Laney >ye p
<mc nich o l l s > an d i f ihavethe LP# in th e c hang e  lo g the n itwill  c loseit onbuild  w on't it?
<Laney > *rebuild f orfo o ( LP : #xx x xx)
<m cni cho lls> th ats the one 
< m c n ic holls> thanks. tha ts a  l ot of qu estion s ,bu t  want to  g etit r i g ht as  the s eare thefirstt hi ng s i hav esubmit te d
< Lan ey> n o  wor ries,it's goo d toa sk
<mcnicholls >  and if i sub s cr i b eu bunt u-u niverse-spo nsor s hipthen so mes hould  come  a l on g  and pick it up? or  d o i ne ed to  do more than  that?
<ry a n a kca> Cou ld s o me o ne take a look  at b ug 343380p lease?
< ubott u> Launc hpad bug3 4 3380 insli ngs hot  "P l e as e sync slings h o t 0. 8. 1p-2 fr omDebianuns tab le(ma in )" [Undec ided,Con fi rm ed ]htt ps:// l aunchpad .n et/ bu gs/ 34338 0 
<nhan dler>  rya na kc a : I 'll tak e  a l ook<A dr i200 0>ry anakc a: w h y w as thebug confi rme d  whi le  n ot acke d?
#ubuntu-mo tu  2010-03-1 5<pe rsia>S c ottK: cr imsun: This hasn't beee n  *the*pla ce to  ask  packagin g q uestio ns( but ra ther o ne of  m any ) since c om mun it y-lucid-mo t u  wa s app ro ved"Develo per Training: dist r ibu te".  This is  st ill* a *pla c ef orpa c kag i n g questions.  # ubuntu-pac ka g in g is mostl y  fo rnew pac kaging,  PPAp ackagin g, deriva tive pack ag ing, e tc.  but simil arly won 't not an s wer q u es tions  ab out ot he r t hings  (alth o ugh  at l east I 'l l redi rectwh en soemt hing is clearly about U buntuproc<pe rsia> ess eso r
 a_bug to_attach the rebuilt debdiff_too, i_suppose_i create_that_against the source_package i am_rebuilding? Any particular format_to create tat_bug_with?
<Laney> just give it a decent title and description and attach the debdiff
<Laney> make_sure_it closes_that_bug
<mcnicholls>_so i am looking at_rebuilding libddm-1-0 to build against_libempathy22 instead_of 19. So in the desktop-data-model source package_i_just create a_bug something like "libddm-1-0 rebuild to remove libempathy19 dependancy"_and attach my debdiff?
<Laney> yep
<mcnicholls> and_if i have_the_LP#_in the change log_then it will close it on_build won't it?
<Laney> * rebuild for_foo (LP: #xxxxx)
<mcnicholls> thats the one
<mcnicholls> thanks._thats a lot of questions, but_want to get it right_as these_are the first things i_have submitted
<Laney> no_worries, it's_good to ask
<mcnicholls>_and if i subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsorship then_some should come_along and pick it up? or_do_i need to_do_more_than that?
<ryanakca>_Could someone take_a_look at_bug_343380 please?
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 343380 in_slingshot_"Please sync slingshot 0.8.1p-2 from Debian unstable_(main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343380
<nhandler> ryanakca:_I'll_take a look
<Adri2000> ryanakca:_why was the bug confirmed_while not acked?
#ubuntu-motu 2010-03-15
<persia> ScottK: crimsun:_This hasn't_beeen *the*_place to ask packaging questions (but rather one of many) since_community-lucid-motu was approved "Developer Training: distribute"._ This is still_*a* place_for_packaging questions. _#ubuntu-packaging_is mostly_for new packaging, PPA packaging, derivative packaging,_etc. but_similarly won't not answer questions about_other things (although at_least_I'll redirect when soemthing is clearly_about Ubuntu proc
<persia> esses or