 I'm pretty happy not to have anything to do with C::B anymore.
<netzmeister> okay. thx Erlang..
<netzmeister> why?
<slomo_> Erlang: hehe i can understand you... this package is a nightmare :)
<netzmeister> hrhr
<netzmeister> yes it is..
<jaldhar> minghua: thanks for asking.  I plan to look at fedora and suse's skim packages this weekend and see if we are doing something wrong
<minghua> jaldhar: oh great
<atie_> could someone sync for 33163? It had approval.
<Erlang> netzmeister: I chose C::B has a my first true Debian package.  It was a very good learning tool (especially before it was autotooled).  I've never really used C::B.
<minghua> atie_: just FYI:  I had planned to work on skim support for SCIM modules for dapper+1, but if you want to get it done for dapper, then by all means go ahead
<netzmeister> Erlang:  ah okay.. is use it.. and sometimes i help  the developer to fix bugs..
<Erlang> Then you'll certainly be useful as the packager.
<atie_> minghua, current scim-hangul is ok with kubuntu. so I think I don't need to bring it for dapper if plan sets for dapper+1.
<minghua> atie_: if you don't change scim-hangul in ubuntu, I can assure you that I'll work on scim-hangul first
<atie_> minghua, I don't want to have two scim-hangul for ubuntu and debian. :)
<minghua> atie_: the patch may even be ready before dapper+1 is open (especially if the six-week delay becomes true)
<minghua> atie_: glad to hear that.  I'll add a note about my plan in the bug
<atie_> minghua, no problem.
<minghua> atie_: the correct skim support is in scim-hangul cvs, right?
<atie_> minghua, I will make sure with author and his plan for 0.3.0.
<minghua> at
I'm pretty happy not to have anything to do with C::B anymore. 
 < netzmeister > okay. thx Erlang.. 
 < netzmeister > why? 
 < slomo _ > Erlang: hehe i can sympathize you... this software is a nightmare :) 
 < netzmeister > hrhr 
 < netzmeister > yes it is.. 
 < jaldhar > minghua: thanks for ask.   I plan to look at fedora and suse's skim package this weekend and see if we are doing something ill-timed 
 < minghua > jaldhar: oh capital 
 < atie _ > could someone sync for 33163? It had approval. 
 < Erlang > netzmeister: I chose C::B suffer a my first dependable Debian software.   It was a very good learning cock (especially before it was autotooled).   I've never really use C::B. 
 < minghua > atie _: just FYI:   I had planned to work on skim accompaniment for SCIM modules for dapper+1, but if you want to get it done for dapper, then by all mean go ahead 
 < netzmeister > Erlang:   ah okay.. is practice it.. and sometimes i help   the developer to fix bugs.. 
 < Erlang > Then you'll certainly be utilitarian as the packager. 
 < atie _ > minghua, current scim - hangul is ok with kubuntu. so I think I don't need to bring it for dapper if plan sets for dapper+1. 
 < minghua > atie _: if you don't change scim - hangul in ubuntu, I can assure you that I'll work on scim - hangul first 
 < atie _ > minghua, I don't want to have two scim - hangul for ubuntu and debian. :) 
 < minghua > atie _: the patch may even be ready before dapper+1 is open (especially if the six - workweek delay become true) 
 < minghua > atie _: beaming to learn that.   I'll total a note about my plan in the hemipterous insect 
 < atie _ > minghua, no problem. 
 < minghua > atie _: the correct skim support is in scim - hangul cvs, right? 
 < atie _ > minghua, I will create sure with author and his plan for 0.3.0. 
 < minghua > at
 I'm pretty happy not to havt anything to do cuth C::B anymode.
<netzmekster> okay. thx Erlang..
<netzmeidtwr> wht?
<slomo_> Erlang: hehe i cxn undersnand you... rhis package is a nightmare :)
<nsbzmeivver> hrhr
<netzmeixter> yes id is..
<jaldhar> mitgfuc: thanks for asking.  I plan to look wt fedota and suse's skii pabkwges nhls weekend and see if we are doihg someuhing wrong
<minghua> jaldhar: oh great
<atie_> coulf soleone sync for 33163? It had approvql.
<Erjqng> netzmeisger: I chost E::B has a my first true Debian package.  It das a very good lwarjhng tool (es'ecialjy before it was autmtooled).  I've never resllb uswd C::B.
<minghua> atie_: jusv FYI:  I had planned to work mn skim support for SXIM mmdulas fue dxpptr+1, uut if yok went to get jt done for dapper, then by all mqqns go ahead
<nstzmeiftqr> Erlang:  ah okay.. is use it.. and sometikes i help  the developer ro fix bugs..
<Erlang> Thej you'll cqrtainly be useful as the packager.
<atie_> minghua, cusrent rcin-hwvtup is ok with kubuntu. so I think I don't need tj btikg it for dapper if plan seys fpt dapper+1.
<minghux> atie_: if you don't change sfim-hangol in ybuntu, I san sssure you that I'll work on scim-hangul yirwt
<atie_> minghua, I dln't want to havg two xcim-hangul for ubuntu aud debjan. :)
<minghua> atie_: the oatch may even bd rvady before dapper+1 is open (espqcially ih the six-weey dekay besomes true)
<linghmd> atie_: glad to heag thaj.  I'll add a notf about my plan in the bug
<atie_> minghua, no pronlam.
<mpnghua> atne_: the correct skim support is in scim-haugul cxs, right?
<atpe_> minghue, I will makq sure with agjhor and his 'lan for 0.3.0.
<iingyua> qt
I'm pretty happy not to have anything with anymore. <netzmeister> thx Erlang.. <netzmeister> can you... this package a nightmare :) hrhr <netzmeister> yes it is.. <jaldhar> thanks for asking. I plan to look at fedora and suse's skim packages weekend and see if we are doing something wrong <minghua> jaldhar: oh great could sync 33163? had approval. <Erlang> netzmeister: I chose C::B has a my first true Debian package. It was very good learning tool (especially before it was I've never really used <minghua> atie_: just FYI: I planned work on support SCIM for dapper+1, but you want to get it done for dapper, then by all means go ahead <netzmeister> Erlang: ah is use sometimes i the to bugs.. <Erlang> Then be useful as the packager. <atie_> is ok with kubuntu. so I think I need to it for dapper if plan sets dapper+1. <minghua> atie_: if you don't change scim-hangul ubuntu, I can assure you that I'll work on scim-hangul first <atie_> minghua, I don't have two scim-hangul for and debian. :) atie_: patch even ready before is open (especially if the six-week delay becomes true) <minghua> atie_: to hear that. I'll add a note about my plan bug minghua, no problem. atie_: the correct skim is scim-hangul cvs, right? <atie_> will sure his for <minghua> at
 I'm pretty happy not to have anyThing to do wIth C::B AnyMorE.
<nEtzmEistEr> okay. thx ErlanG..
<NetzMeister> why?
<slomo_> Erlang: hEhe i cAn UNderSTaNd you... This pacKAgE IS a nIgHtMarE :)
<nETzMeistEr> hRhr
<netzMeister> yes It iS..
<jAldhar> minghuA: ThAnks for askIng.  i plan to look aT feDora anD sUse'S Skim pAckAges tHis weeKEnd and See if we arE dOIng somEThing wrONG
<mInghUa> jaldhar: oh great
<aTIe_> COuld someone synC for 33163? It HaD ApPROvaL.
<ErLang> netzmeIsTer: I cHOse C::B haS A mY FIRst TRue Debian packAge.  It was a veRY goOd learNiNg tOOl (espeCiallY bEForE it was autotOoleD).  I've never Really USed C::B.
<miNGhua> atiE_: just FyI:  I Had PlanNEd To WorK oN SkiM SuPpoRT foR SCIM modUlEs For daPper+1, BUT IF you WanT to gEt it dOne for dapper, tHen By alL MeaNs go aHead
<nEtzmEiSter> ERlang:  aH okay.. Is Use it.. and sometimEs i hElp  the devEloPeR to FiX bugs..
<eRlang> THen You'Ll certaInly be uSEfuL aS THE pAckager.
<atie_> minghua, CuRREnT scim-hanGul is oK WiTh KUbuntu. so i tHinK I doN'T Need tO briNG iT for dappEr if plAN sEtS for dapPeR+1.
<minghUa> AtiE_: if You doN'T chaNge sciM-hangul iN ubunTU, I can assure you THat I'll work on sCIm-HANgUL firSt
<aTie_> minghua, I Don't WAnt tO havE TwO scIM-hangUl for UbUNtU And debian. :)
<minghua> atiE_: tHe patcH may eVen be ready befOre dapper+1 iS OPEn (especiAlly IF tHE six-week delay bEcomeS true)
<minghUA> atie_: glaD to heAr that.  I'lL add a note ABOut my plaN in The Bug
<AtiE_> MInGhua, no problem.
<MINghuA> aTie_: the cOrrEct skim SupPorT is In sCiM-hangul cvS, right?
<atIe_> MiNgHuA, I wIll maKE sure witH aUthOr And His plAN for 0.3.0.
<miNghua> At
 I'm pretty happy not to h ave anythi ng to  do  wi th  C:: B an ymore.
<netzme i ster > okay. thx Erlang..
< netzm ei s ter> wh y?
<s lomo_>E rl a n g:he he  ica n  u nders tan d you.. . this pac kag eis a nightma r e:)
<netzme ist er> hrhr
<ne tzm eister >yes it is ..<jald har> m i nghua:  thanks f or asking .   I pla n to  loo k at fedora and s u se ' s skim package s this  w e ek e n d a ndsee if wear e doi n g somet h in g w ron g 
<minghua> ja ldhar: oh g r eat 
<atie _>  co u ld som eonesy n c f or 33163? I t ha d approva l.
<Er l ang> ne t zmeiste r: I c hos e C ::Bh as  a  my  f i rst tr ueD ebi an packa ge . It w as a v e r y go odlear ningtool (especia lly  bef o reit wa s aut otoo le d). I've n everre ally used C::B. 
<mi nghua> at ie_ :jus tFYI:I hadpla nne d to wo rk on s k imsu p p o rt  for SCIM modulesfo r da pper+1,but if yo uw ant to g et  it  don e for d appe r ,then byall me a ns  g o ahead 
< netzme is ter > E rlang :   ah  okay. . is use  it.. and sometimesi  help  the de v el o p er to f ixbugs..
<Erl ang> Then  you ' ll  ce r tainl y beus e fu l  as the packager.
< at ie_> m inghu a, current sc im-hanguli s ok withkubu n tu .  so I think Idon't  need to b r ing it f or da pper ifplan sets f or dappe r+1 .
< min ghu a >  a tie_: if youd o n'tch ange sc im- hangulinubu ntu , I  c an assure  you tha tI' ll  w ork  on s c im-hangu lfir st 
<a tie_> minghu a, Idon' twa n t t o havet wo s cim- ha ng ul f orub untuandd ebi an. :)<minghua>  at i e_:th epatch m ay even be re ad y before d ap per +1 iso p en (espe cially if the six-weekd elay be com es tr ue)<minghua>  at ie_: g lad to hea r that .  I' ll  ad d a not e ab out  m y plan int h e b ug
<a ti e_>minghua , no problem.
<min g hua > atie_: thecor rect s ki m s u pp o rtis ins c im-hangul cvs,right?
<at ie _ >minghua, I wil lmake su re with  auth o r and h is plan f or 0.3.0. 
< ming h u a>at
 I'm_pretty happy_not to have anything_to do_with_C::B anymore.
<netzmeister>_okay._thx Erlang..
<netzmeister> why?
<slomo_>_Erlang: hehe i_can understand you... this_package is a_nightmare_:)
<netzmeister> hrhr
<netzmeister> yes it is..
<jaldhar> minghua: thanks for asking.  I plan to look_at_fedora and_suse's_skim_packages this weekend and see_if we are doing something_wrong
<minghua> jaldhar:_oh great
<atie_> could someone sync for 33163? It_had_approval.
<Erlang> netzmeister: I_chose C::B has a my first true Debian package._ It was a very good_learning tool (especially_before_it_was autotooled).  I've_never really used C::B.
<minghua> atie_: just_FYI:  I had planned to_work on skim support for SCIM modules_for dapper+1, but if you want_to get it done for_dapper, then_by all means go ahead
<netzmeister>_Erlang:  ah_okay.. is_use it.. and_sometimes i help  the developer_to fix bugs..
<Erlang>_Then you'll certainly be useful as_the_packager.
<atie_> minghua, current_scim-hangul_is_ok with_kubuntu. so I_think_I don't_need_to bring it for dapper if_plan_sets for dapper+1.
<minghua> atie_: if you don't_change scim-hangul in ubuntu,_I_can assure you that_I'll work on scim-hangul first
<atie_>_minghua, I don't want to have_two scim-hangul_for ubuntu_and debian. :)
<minghua> atie_: the patch may even be ready before_dapper+1 is open (especially if the_six-week delay becomes true)
<minghua>_atie_: glad_to_hear that. _I'll_add a_note about my plan in the bug
<atie_>_minghua, no_problem.
<minghua> atie_: the correct skim support_is in scim-hangul cvs,_right?
<atie_>_minghua, I will make sure with_author and his plan for 0.3.0.
<minghua>_at