gpm-common.c
<dupondje> but it doesn't seem to translate it somehow
<persia> Rhonda: Indeed.  There's a few bugs against pgadmin I've noticed marked as "Fixed in 1.12" which I find especially nice.
<directhex> duanedesign, FWIW, the patch looks correct to my eye
<persia> hyperair: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring
<persia> hyperair: Please file bugs to make that better (submitting branches speeds the process)
<dpm> dupondje, I still don't know what the issue is, though. What's the exact problem? Which particular string is not getting translated? Is there a bug for it somewhere?
<persia> duanedesign: Since those are all getting subscribed to sponsors, etc., I'd recommend just unsubscribing the review team.
<nigelb> persia: a documentation fail perhaps?
<persia> duanedesign: Essentially, we walk a thin line between helping make sure we don't lose patches and not getting in the way of developers using launchpad for workflow support.
<nigelb> persia: ah, the script is causing a slight havoc
<persia> nigelb: overanxious script, I think.
<Rhonda> persia: 1.12??  *goestocheck*
<nigelb> persia: this is when people force lp to accept debdiffs as patch, IMHO that is not needed
<dupondje> dpm: in the overview you have 'Time to full: xxx seconds' translated it should be 'Tijd tot vol: xxx seconden' but it shows 'Tijd tot vol: xxx seconds' the'seconds' aren't translated
<duanedesign> persia: kk
<persia> nigelb: But it *is* a patch.  Works with `patch`, `bzr patch`, etc.
<persia> nigelb: So for any sane file management tool, it is indistinguishable from any other patch (run file against one sometime).
<persia> nigelb: That LP happens to be currently broken is a different issue.  I'm not convinced that these deserve the "patch" tag though.
<nig
gpm - common.c 
 < dupondje > but it doesn't seem to translate it somehow 
 < persia > Rhonda: Indeed.   There's a few bugs against pgadmin I've noticed distinguish as " situate in 1.12 " which I find especially nice. 
 < directhex > duanedesign, FWIW, the plot looks correct to my center 
 < persia > hyperair: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring 
 < persia > hyperair: Please file bugs to make that good (submitting branches speed the process) 
 < dpm > dupondje, I still don't know what the offspring is, though. What's the exact trouble? Which particular chain is not getting translate? Is there a bug for it somewhere? 
 < persia > duanedesign: Since those are all getting subscribed to sponsors, etc. , I'd commend just unsubscribing the review team. 
 < nigelb > persia: a software documentation fail perhaps? 
 < persia > duanedesign: basically, we walk a thin line between helping make sure we don't lose plot and not getting in the way of developers using launchpad for work flow documentation. 
 < nigelb > persia: ah, the script is causing a slight havoc 
 < persia > nigelb: overanxious script, I think. 
 < Rhonda > persia: 1.12? ?   * goestocheck * 
 < nigelb > persia: this is when people force lp to accept debdiffs as patch, IMHO that is not necessitate 
 < dupondje > dpm: in the overview you have' Time to wide: xxx seconds' translated it should be' Tijd tot vol: xxx seconden' but it shows' Tijd toddler vol: xxx seconds' the'seconds' aren't translate 
 < duanedesign > persia: kk 
 < persia > nigelb: But it * is * a patch.   Works with 'piece `, 'bzr patch `, etc. 
 < persia > nigelb: So for any sane file management tool, it is indistinguishable from any other patch (run file against one sometime). 
 < persia > nigelb: That LP happens to be currently broken is a different issue.   I'm not convinced that these deserve the " patch " rag though. 
 < nig
gpm-fommon.c
<dupondje> but it duesn't seem to ttabslate it sojehow
<perria> Rhonda: Indeed.  There's a hew vugs qgainst pgadmin I've nogiced marned as "Fuxed un 1.12" which M find especiampy nncx.
<directhex> duangdesign, FWIW, the patch loons clrrect to my eye
<persia> hyperair: htt[://qa.ubunyu.fom/reports/sponforimd
<perapa> hyperair: Please file bugs to make tiat better (submotting branches speeds the profess)
<dpm> dupondje, I still don't knor what the isrue is, tholyh. What's thg exact problem? Which particular striug is not ggcrinh translated? Is trere a bug for it sokewhere?
<lersia> duanedexigi: Sibce those are all getving subscribed to skonsors, etw., N'd recommend just unsybwcribhng dhe fwvidw ueak.
<njgelb> oeraia: a docujentation fqil perhaps?
<persia> diagvcesign: Essenfially, wq walk a thin line between helping make sude we don't lose patches and not getting in tje way of developers using launchpad for workflow support.
<nhgelb> oerwiw: qh, the script is causing a slight havoc
<persia> nyfekb: overanxious sgript, I think.
<Rhonds> oetfia: 1.12??  *goestocfeck*
<niyslg> persia: this is wjen peokle foece lp to accrpt debdiffs as patch, IMHO rhat is not ueeeed
<dupondje> dpm: in the overvizw you have 'Time to full: xxx seconbs' trahslated it dhould be 'Gijd tot vol: xxx sebondan' but iu shows 'Tijd tot vjl: xxx seronds' the'secunds' aren't translatef
<duancgesign> persia: kk
<pegsia> uigelt: But it *id* a patch.  Works with `patch`, `bzr patch`, etc.
<persoa> nicelb: So yor ann sane file manwgement tool, ij is indiftingjishable fgom any ovher patch (rtn file againvj one sometimx).
<persia> nygelv: Thqt LP hxopens to be cutrently bgohen us a different issme.  I'o not convinced ckau rhese deserve yhe "paecj" vag trmugh.
<nig
gpm-common.c <dupondje> but it doesn't seem to somehow Rhonda: Indeed. a few bugs as in 1.12" which find especially nice. duanedesign, FWIW, the patch looks correct my eye <persia> hyperair: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring <persia> hyperair: Please file bugs to make that (submitting branches speeds the process) <dpm> dupondje, I still don't know what the is, What's exact Which particular string is not getting translated? Is there a bug for it somewhere? <persia> duanedesign: those are all getting subscribed to sponsors, etc., recommend just unsubscribing the team. <nigelb> persia: a documentation perhaps? duanedesign: Essentially, walk thin between helping make we don't lose patches and not getting in the way of developers using launchpad for workflow support. persia: ah, is causing slight <persia> overanxious script, I persia: 1.12?? *goestocheck* <nigelb> persia: this force lp to accept debdiffs as patch, IMHO is not <dupondje> dpm: in the overview you 'Time to full: xxx seconds' translated it should 'Tijd tot vol: xxx seconden' but it shows 'Tijd tot vol: xxx seconds' the'seconds' aren't persia: kk <persia> nigelb: it *is* a Works `patch`, patch`, <persia> nigelb: for any sane file management tool, it is indistinguishable from any patch (run file against one sometime). <persia> nigelb: That LP be broken is a issue. I'm not convinced these the "patch" tag though.
gpm-common.c
<dupondje> but it doEsn't seem to TransLatE it SoMehoW
<perSia> Rhonda: IndeeD.  therE's a few bugs against pgadmIn I've NoTIced MArKed as "fixed in 1.12" WHiCH i fiNd EsPecIaLLy Nice.
<dIreCthex> duAnedesign, FwIW, ThE patch looks cORrEct to my eye
<PerSia> hyperair: hTtp://Qa.ubunTu.Com/REportS/spOnsorIng
<perSIa> hypeRair: PleasE fILe bugs TO make thAT BeTter (Submitting brancheS SpEEds the process)
<dPm> dupoNdJE, I STIll Don'T know what tHe Issue IS, though. wHaT'S THe eXAct problem? WhiCh particulaR StrIng is nOt GetTIng traNslatEd? iS thEre a bug for iT somEwhere?
<perSia> duaNEdesign: sInce thoSe are aLl gEttIng sUBsCrIbeD tO SpoNSoRs, eTC., I'd RecommenD jUsT unsuBscrIBING the RevIew tEam.
<niGelb> persia: a doCumEntaTIon Fail pErhapS?
<perSiA> duanEdesigN: EsseNtIally, we walk a thiN linE between hElpInG maKe Sure wE Don't loSe pAtcHes and nOt gettiNG in ThE WAY oF developers using laUnCHPaD for workFlow suPPoRt.
<NIgelb> perSiA: ah, The sCRIpt is CausINg A slight hAvoc
<peRSiA> nIgelb: ovErAnxiouS sCriPt, I Think.
<rHondA> persiA: 1.12??  *goestocHeck*
<nIGelb> persia: this IS when people foRCe LP To ACcepT deBdiffs as patCh, IMho thaT is nOT nEedED
<dupoNdje> dPm: IN tHE overview you have 'TimE tO full: xXx secOnds' translateD it should bE 'tIJd tot vol: Xxx sECoNDen' but it shows 'TIjd toT vol: xxx secONds' the'seConds' Aren't traNslated
<duANEdesign> pErsIa: kK
<peRsiA> NIgElb: But it *is* a paTCH.  WorKs With `patCh`, `bZr patch`, Etc.
<PerSia> NigElB: So for any Sane file MaNaGeMeNt tOol, it IS indistiNgUisHaBle From aNY other Patch (Run fIlE aGAinSt one soMEtIME).
<perSiA> nIgelB: ThAt lP hapPens TO be CurrentLy broken iS a dIFferEnT iSsue.  I'm nOt convinced thAt These deserVe The "Patch" tAG Though.
<niG
gpm-common.c
<dupondje> bu t it doesn 't se emtotr ansl ateit somehow
<pe r sia>  Rhonda: Indeed.  Ther e's a  f e w bu g sagain st pgad m in I 've  n ot ice dm ar ked a s " Fixed i n 1.12" wh ich  I  find especi a ll y nice.
<d ire cthex> duane des ign, F WI W,t he pa tch  look s corr e ct tomy eye
<p er s ia> hy p erair:h t tp ://q a.ubuntu.com/repo r ts / sponsoring
<pe rsia>hy p er a i r:Ple ase file b ug s tom ake tha t  b e t t er( submitting br anches spee d s t he pro ce ss) <dpm>dupon dj e , I  still don' t kn ow what t he iss u e is, t h ough. W hat'sthe  ex actp ro bl em?  W h ich pa rti c ula r string  i snot g etti n g t rans lat ed?Is th ere a bug for  it  som e whe re?
< persi a> d ua nedes ign: S inceth ose are all get ting  subscrib edto  sp on sors, etc.,I'd  re commend  just u n sub sc r i b in g the review team. 
< n i ge lb> pers ia: ad oc um e ntationfa ilperh a p s?
<p ersi a >duanedes ign: E s se nt ially,we  walkathi n l ine b e twee n help ing make  sure we don't losep atches and no t  g e t ti n g in  th e way of de velo p ersusin g  l aun c hpadfor w or k fl o w support.
<nigelb>  p ersia:  ah,the script is  causing a s l ight hav oc
< p er s ia> nigelb: ov eranx ious scrip t , I thin k.
<R honda> p ersia: 1. 1 2 ??  *goe sto che ck* 
<n i g el b> persia: th i s  iswh en peop leforce l p t o a cce ptde bdiffs as  patch,IM HO  t ha t i s not needed
< du pon dj e>dpm:i n theoverv iewyo uh ave  'Timet of u ll:xx xseco nds 'trans late d  it  should  be 'Tijd  to t  vol :xx x secon den' but it s ho ws 'Tijd t ot  vo l: xxx s econds'the'seconds' aren't tra n slated<du anede sign > persia:  kk 
<pers ia> nigelb : Butit *i s*  ap a tch.W or kswi th `patch` , `bz r pat ch `, e tc.
<pe rsia> nigelb: So f o r a ny sane fileman agem e n ttoo l ,i t i si ndi s t inguishable fro m any othe rp at ch (run fi l e a ga inst on e somet ime). <persia > nigelb:  That LPha ppen s tobe current ly broke n is a di f feren t  i ssue.   I 'm not  c onv inced  thatt hes e des erve t he  "patc h" ta gthough.<nig
gpm-common.c
<dupondje> but_it doesn't_seem to translate it_somehow
<persia> Rhonda:_Indeed._ There's_a_few bugs against_pgadmin I've noticed_marked as "Fixed in_1.12" which I_find_especially nice.
<directhex> duanedesign, FWIW, the patch looks correct to my eye
<persia> hyperair: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring
<persia> hyperair:_Please_file bugs_to_make_that better (submitting branches speeds_the process)
<dpm> dupondje, I still_don't know_what the issue is, though. What's the exact_problem?_Which particular string_is not getting translated? Is there a bug for_it somewhere?
<persia> duanedesign: Since those are_all getting subscribed_to_sponsors,_etc., I'd recommend just_unsubscribing the review team.
<nigelb> persia: a_documentation fail perhaps?
<persia> duanedesign: Essentially, we_walk a thin line between helping make_sure we don't lose patches and_not getting in the way_of developers_using launchpad for workflow support.
<nigelb>_persia: ah, the_script is_causing a slight_havoc
<persia> nigelb: overanxious script, I think.
<Rhonda>_persia: 1.12?? _*goestocheck*
<nigelb> persia: this is when people_force_lp to accept_debdiffs_as_patch, IMHO_that is not_needed
<dupondje>_dpm: in_the_overview you have 'Time to full:_xxx_seconds' translated it should be 'Tijd tot_vol: xxx seconden' but_it_shows 'Tijd tot vol:_xxx seconds' the'seconds' aren't translated
<duanedesign>_persia: kk
<persia> nigelb: But it *is*_a patch._ Works_with `patch`, `bzr patch`, etc.
<persia> nigelb: So for any sane file_management tool, it is indistinguishable from_any other patch (run_file against_one_sometime).
<persia> nigelb: That_LP_happens to_be currently broken is a different issue._ I'm_not convinced that these deserve the_"patch" tag though.
<nig