".
<frankban> I have a suggestion for everyone here who want to create a programming language: please call it in a way you can easily find info using google: a neologism with len >= 4 is strongly  appreciated
<bac> frankban: +1
<bac> G+ needs a 'translate' button for comments
<gary_poster> heh
<gary_poster> frankban, I find "golang" works ok
<frankban> gary_poster: coll didn't know, I was using "go language"
 * gmb -> very late lunch; back later
<gary_poster> benji, I saw discussion in -dev with jml.  What he said about the purpose of the forwarding result makes sense (where each test needs to be isolated, not just each call), but I thought that the semaphore was handled explicitly so that would work fine.  As I thought about it more, though, I realized I can't imagine a truly sane story for global tags within a merged set of test streams
<gary_poster> the expectations for the meaning of global tags would have to be drastically reduced
<gary_poster> though, I'm not really sure what the use cases are for global tags anyway
<gary_poster> stepping away; back again soon
<benji> gary_poster: (I was eating lunch.) right, I don't think there is a general story that will work with tags without a great deal of development effort, however if we are specific about what TSFR needs to do and what it doesn't do, I think we can get something that continues to work.  The funny part is that it is less and less important to us for our worker ID tagging result wrapper.
<gary_poster> benji, less and less important: it was only importat initially as it helped us understand what was going on, and you were using it as a template of sorts, right?
<gary_poster> bac, lemme know when you are around and we can pair
<bac> gary_poster: i'm here.
<benji> right; at this point we could just abandon any work on it and go ahead with what we want
<benji> well, not quite: I'm pretty sure as-is TSFW is broken with respect to tags,
". 
 < frankban > I have a suggestion for everyone here who want to create a scheduling linguistic process: please call it in a way you can well find information using google: a neologism with len > = 4 is strongly   appreciate 
 < bac > frankban: +1 
 < bac > G+ want a' translate' button for comments 
 < gary_poster > heh 
 < gary_poster > frankban, I find " golang " works ok 
 < frankban > gary_poster: coll didn't sleep together, I was using " go lyric " 
  * gmb - > very belated lunch; back later 
 < gary_poster > benji, I saw discussion in -dev with jml.   What he said about the purpose of the forwarding consequence makes sense (where each test need to be isolated, not just each call), but I think that the semaphore was handled explicitly so that would work fine.   As I thought about it more, though, I realized I can't think a truly sane story for global tags within a merged hardening of test streams 
 < gary_poster > the expectations for the meaning of global tags would have to be drastically reduced 
 < gary_poster > though, I'm not really sure what the use subject are for global tags anyway 
 < gary_poster > step away; back again soon 
 < benji > gary_poster: (I was eating lunch .) right, I don't remember there is a general story that will work with tag without a great deal of development effort, however if we are specific about what TSFR want to do and what it doesn't do, I think we can get something that continue to make.   The fishy part is that it is less and less important to us for our worker ID tagging resultant role wrapper. 
 < gary_poster > benji, less and less important: it was only importat initially as it help us understand what was going on, and you were using it as a template of sorts, correct? 
 < gary_poster > bac, lemme know when you are round and we can pair 
 < bac > gary_poster: i'm here. 
 < benji > right; at this detail we could just vacate any work on it and go ahead with what we want 
 < benji > well, not quite: I'm pretty certain as - is TSFW is broken with respect to tag,
".
<frajkban> I have a suggestiok for everyone hgrw who xant to create x programming language: pleasx caol it in a way you can easiuy find ijfo usint goitle: a neologism wibk len >= 4 is wtrongly  apprgciated
<bac> fsankban: +1
<bac> G+ teddd a 'translate' button for comments
<gawy_postet> jeh
<gary_poster> sranlfan, J find "golang" works ok
<frankban> garg_poster: coll didn't kmow, I was using "go languagf"
 * glb -> very late luncj; back latet
<farr_poster> benji, I saw disbbssion in -dgv with jml.  What he said about ghe pbrpose of tye fogfarding resnlt mahes sense (whcge each test nreds to be isokatxd, nit just each call), but I thought that thg semaphora cas handled explicitlt wo thdt wmuld qory fjnx.  Zs I tjoujht about if more, thouth, I realized I can'u iiqgine a truly sane ftjry for global tags within a merged set of test streams
<gary_poster> the expectations for the meanyng of global tags would have to be drastically raducev
<gxry_kowter> gyokgh, I'm not really sure what the use cases are rot nlobal tags anywcy
<gary_poster> stelplnb away; back agxin soon
<bsnji> gary_poster: (I aas eatyng lynch.) righu, I dpn't think there is a generao story that qill work with tagd without a grest desl of development efforc, howeber if we age specifjz about what TSFF nveds to do and what it doesn't qo, I thinj we can geg sokethind that conhinues to work.  The funnj parj is tvat it is pess and less important to us for our worker OD tacging refult erapper.
<gary_pofter> benji, lesx and lzss imoortant: it was onny importat initially as lt helped us understwnd qhat was gokvg on, and you eere usiny it qs a template of sprtr, right?
<gary_postex> vac, lemme know ehev yju ace arjgnd and we cdn pxir
<csc> gafy_poster: i'm fere.
<nenji> right; at this [oinf we could just absnqon any qork on yt and go ahesd with what we wajt
<benoi> welu, not quyte: I'm pretty sure as-is TSFW ia broken aitm respect to eags,
". <frankban> I have a suggestion for who to create programming language: please you easily find info google: a neologism len >= 4 is strongly appreciated frankban: +1 <bac> G+ needs a 'translate' button for comments <gary_poster> heh <gary_poster> I find "golang" works ok <frankban> gary_poster: coll didn't know, I was using language" gmb very lunch; back later <gary_poster> benji, I saw discussion in -dev with jml. What he said about purpose of the forwarding result makes sense (where test needs to be not just each call), but thought the semaphore handled so would work fine. I thought about it more, though, I realized I can't imagine a truly sane story for global within a of test <gary_poster> expectations the meaning of would have to be drastically reduced not really sure what the use cases are global tags <gary_poster> stepping away; back again soon gary_poster: (I was eating lunch.) right, I don't there is a general story that will work with tags without a great deal of however if we are about what TSFR to and it do, I we can get something that continues to work. The funny part that it is less and less important to us for ID result wrapper. <gary_poster> less and less important: was importat initially as it understand was you using as a template of right? <gary_poster> bac, lemme know you are around and i'm here. <benji> right; at this point we just abandon any work on it and ahead with what we want <benji> well, not quite: I'm pretty sure TSFW is respect to tags,
".
<frankban> I have a suggestion fOr everyone Here wHo wAnt To CreaTe a pRogramming langUAge: pLease call it in a way you caN easiLy FInd iNFo Using Google: a NEoLOGisM wItH leN >= 4 iS StRonglY  apPreciatEd
<bac> frankBan: +1
<BaC> G+ needs a 'tranSLaTe' button foR coMments
<gary_poSteR> heh
<gaRy_PosTEr> fraNkbAn, I fiNd "golaNG" works Ok
<frankbaN> gARy_postER: coll diDN'T kNow, I Was using "go languagE"
 * GmB -> Very late lunch; bAck latEr
<GArY_POstEr> bEnji, I saw diScUssioN In -dev wiTH jML.  wHat HE said about the Purpose of thE ForWardinG rEsuLT makes Sense (WhERe eAch test needS to bE isolated, Not jusT Each calL), But I thoUght thAt tHe sEmapHOrE wAs hAnDLed EXpLicITly So that woUlD wOrk fiNe.  As i THOUght AboUt it More, tHough, I realizeD I cAn't iMAgiNe a trUly saNe stOrY for gLobal tAgs wiThIn a merged set of tEst sTreams
<garY_poStEr> tHe ExpecTAtions For The Meaning Of globaL TagS wOULD hAve to be drastically ReDUCeD
<gary_posTer> thoUGh, i'm NOt really SuRe wHat tHE Use caSes aRE fOr global Tags anYWaY
<gAry_postEr> SteppiNg AwaY; baCk agaIN sooN
<benji> Gary_postEr: (I waS Eating lunch.) rigHT, I don't think thERe IS A gENeraL stOry that will Work WIth tAgs wIThOut A Great Deal oF dEVeLOpment effort, however If We are sPecifIc about what TSfR needs to dO AND what it dOesn'T Do, i Think we can get sOmethIng that conTInues to wOrk.  ThE funny paRt is that iT IS less and LesS imPorTanT TO uS for our worker id TaggInG result WraPper.
<garY_poSteR> beNji, LeSs and less ImportanT: iT wAs OnLy iMportAT initialLy As iT hElpEd us uNDerstaNd whaT was GoInG On, aNd you weRE uSINg it As A tEmplAte Of Sorts, RighT?
<GarY_poster> Bac, lemme kNow WHen yOu ArE around And we can pair
<bAc> Gary_poster: I'm HerE.
<benji> RIGht; at thiS point we could just abandoN Any work On iT and gO aheAd with whaT we Want
<beNji> WEll, not Quite: I'M pretTy SurE AS-is TSfw Is BroKeN with respeCT To tAgs,
".
<frankban> I have a sug gestion fo r eve ryo nehe re w ho w ant to createa  pro gramming language: ple ase c al l  iti na way  you ca n  e a s ily  f in d i nf o  u singgoo gle: aneologismwit hlen >= 4 iss tr ongly  app rec iated
<bac>fra nkban:  + 1
< b ac> G + n eedsa 'tra n slate'  button f or commen t s
<gary _ p os ter>  heh
<gary_poster >  f r ankban, I find  "gola ng "  w o r ksok<frankban>  g ary_p o ster: c o ll d i dn' t  know, I wasusing "go l a ngu age"
*gmb -> ver y lat el unc h; back lat er
< gary_post er> be n ji, I s a w discu ssionin-de v wi t hjm l. W h ath esai d  ab out thepu rp ose o f th e f o rwar din g re sultmakes sense ( whe re e a chtestneeds  tobe  isol ated,not j us t each call), b ut I  thoughttha tthe  s emaph o re was  ha ndl ed expl icitlys o t ha t w ou ld work fine.  AsIt h ou ght abou t it m o re ,t hough, I  r eal ized I  can' t im a gi ne a tru ly san e  s to ry forgl obal t ag s w ith in am erge d setof teststrea m s
<gary_poster >  the expectat i on s fo r  the  me aning of gl obal tags  wou l dhav e  to b e dra st i ca l ly reduced
<gary_po st er> th ough,  I'm not real ly sure wh a t the usecase s  a r e for global t ags a nyway
<gar y _poster>  step ping awa y; back a g a in soon<be nji > g ary _ p os ter: (I was e a t inglu nch.) r igh t, I do n't  th ink  th er e is a ge neral st or yth at  wi ll wo r k with t ag s w it hou t a g r eat de al of  dev el op m ent  effort ,  h o w ever  i fwe a resp ecifi c ab o utwhat TS FR needstod o an dwh at it d oesn't do, Ith ink we can  g etsometh i n g that c ontinues to work.  Thef unny pa rtis th at i t is less  an d less  im p ortant  to us  forou r w o r ker I D ta ggi ng  result wr a p per .
<ga ry _pos ter> be nji, less and less imp ortant: it wa s o nlyi m po rta t  i n iti al l y a s it helped us un derstand w ha t  w as going o n , a nd  you we re usin g ita s a tem plate ofsorts, ri gh t?
< g a ry_ poster> ba c, lemme  know whe n  youa re  arou ndand we  c anpair<bac>g ary _post er: i' mhere.<benj i>  right;at this point we couldjust a bando n a ny work o n i t  an d go ahea d wi th what we  wa nt<benj i>w ell,notq ui te: I'm p rett y  sure as- i sTSF W is  broken wit h r esp ect t o t a gs,
".
<frankban> I_have a_suggestion for everyone here_who want_to_create a_programming_language: please call_it in a_way you can easily_find info using_google:_a neologism with len >= 4 is strongly  appreciated
<bac> frankban: +1
<bac> G+ needs_a_'translate' button_for_comments
<gary_poster>_heh
<gary_poster> frankban, I find "golang"_works ok
<frankban> gary_poster: coll didn't_know, I_was using "go language"
 * gmb -> very_late_lunch; back later
<gary_poster>_benji, I saw discussion in -dev with jml. _What he said about the purpose_of the forwarding_result_makes_sense (where each test_needs to be isolated, not just_each call), but I thought that_the semaphore was handled explicitly so that_would work fine.  As I_thought about it more, though,_I realized_I can't imagine a truly_sane story for_global tags_within a merged_set of test streams
<gary_poster> the expectations_for the meaning_of global tags would have to_be_drastically reduced
<gary_poster> though,_I'm_not_really sure_what the use_cases_are for_global_tags anyway
<gary_poster> stepping away; back again_soon
<benji>_gary_poster: (I was eating lunch.) right, I_don't think there is_a_general story that will_work with tags without a_great deal of development effort, however_if we_are specific_about what TSFR needs to do and what it doesn't do,_I think we can get something_that continues to work._ The_funny_part is that_it_is less_and less important to us for our_worker ID_tagging result wrapper.
<gary_poster> benji, less and_less important: it was_only_importat initially as it helped us_understand what was going on, and_you were using it as_a_template_of sorts, right?
<gary_poster> bac, lemme_know when you are around and_we can pair
<bac>_gary_poster: i'm here.
<benji> right; at this point_we_could just abandon any work on_it_and go ahead with what we_want
<benji>_well,_not quite: I'm pretty sure_as-is TSFW is broken with respect_to tags,