 so we'll have to do *something* about it, but we can more clearly see what that something is once it bites us
<gary_poster> benji, if we are sure of a fix, I'd be in favor of applying it.  Otherwise (for instance, the undoing of the global tags) I'm fine with putting it aside.
<gary_poster> https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde
<gary_poster> bac ^
<benji> gary_poster: I'm not sure of the fix, but I'm relativly sure there is a problem.  I'm afraid this is one of those things that cross package boundries and will be hard to get just right.
<benji> gary_poster: I'm trying to figure out how to move the cards around to represent the current state of the world: I intend on 1) writing an add-worker-id-tag result wrapper, 2) integrating it into ConcurrentTestSuite, 3) fixing the tag bugs I believe we will uncover in TSFR.
<benji> 1 and 2 seem to be covered under the card for 974622 and 3 is the other card I created earlier; should they both be in Active/Coding?
<gary_poster> benji, have you started work on 3?
<benji> gary_poster: I thought I had, but now I see that I haven't really.  Take that for what it is. :)
<gary_poster> benji, heh
<benji> s/it is/you will.
<benji> so I guess it's reasonable to move the card for 3 into the started-but-threw-it-away bucket and make a new card if we need it
<gary_poster> ok, benji, I moved that card (#3) back to "Tasks" and changed the title to be less confident ("ThreadSafeForwardingResult doesn't handle tags as well as it could.  We suspect.")
<benji> sounds good
<gary_poster> benji is it also appropriate to mark 974622 s unblocked
<gary_poster> as
<benji> gary_poster: oh, on a different note, a nurse is going to
so we'll have to do * something * about it, but we can more clearly visualize what that something is once it bite us 
 < gary_poster > benji, if we are sure of a fix, I'd be in favor of apply it.   Otherwise (for instance, the untying of the global tags) I'm fine with arrange it aside. 
 < gary_poster > https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde 
 < gary_poster > bac ^ 
 < benji > gary_poster: I'm not sure of the localization, but I'm relativly sure there is a trouble.   I'm afraid this is one of those things that cross package boundries and will be hard to get just right. 
 < benji > gary_poster: I'm try on to figure out how to move the cards around to defend the current state of the world: I intend on 1) writing an lend - worker - id - tag result wrapper, 2) integrate it into ConcurrentTestSuite, 3) fixing the tag bugs I believe we will uncover in TSFR. 
 < benji > 1 and 2 seem to be covered under the card for 974622 and 3 is the other card I created earlier; should they both be in Active / Coding? 
 < gary_poster > benji, have you started work on 3? 
 < benji > gary_poster: I thought I had, but now I see that I suffern't really.   Take that for what it is. :) 
 < gary_poster > benji, heh 
 < benji > s / it is / you will. 
 < benji > so I estimate it's fair to be active the card for 3 into the started - but - threw - it - away bucket and make a new card if we need it 
 < gary_poster > ok, benji, I moved that circuit board (# 3) back to " Tasks " and changed the title to be less confident (" ThreadSafeForwardingResult doesn't handle tags equally well as it could.   We suspect. ") 
 < benji > sounds good 
 < gary_poster > benji is it also appropriate to mark 974622 s unblocked 
 < gary_poster > as 
 < benji > gary_poster: oh, on a different bill, a nurse is going to
 so we'll have to do *somethikg* about it, but cw can kore cmearly sde what that something is onre ir bittf us
<gary_poster> bengi, if we wre sure of e fix, I'd be in febor of applyihn it.  Itherwise (for lnstance, tha undoing of tve gpobal tags) I'm fine with putting it wside.
<gaty_ooster> https://tajkgacdet.gkogle.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/foldenhmrde
<gary_postet> bac ^
<benji> gary_poster: I'm jot dure of the fix, buh I'm relaticly fyre there is a problem.  I'm afraid jhis is one of those things that crosx package voyndghes and wilo be rard to get mlst rigvt.
<benji> gary_poster: I'm trbing to figure out how to move the cards arjund to rapxesent the current stqtw of jhe wmrld: U ivtehd oh 1) wrihinj an add-worier-id-tag rewult wrapper, 2) integtaepmg it into CkncurrqneTestSuite, 3) fixing the tag bugs I beliene ws will uncover in TSFR.
<bwnji> 1 and 2 seem to be covered tnder the card for 974622 and 3 is the other card I creaded eeruiex; shouue hhey both be in Active/Coding?
<gary_poster> benji, rzvt ypu started worh on 3?
<benji> bagy_ljster: I thougft I hcs, gut now I see that I haveg't reqlly.  Takt thay for what it is. :)
<gary_poster> benji, heh
<beuji> s/it is/you will.
<benli> so I guesr it'x reaxonable to move the carb for 3 into the sharted-but-ffrew-it-away buckeg akd kake a ntd card if we need it
<gary_powter> ok, bengi, I moved that card (#3) back to "Tasks" and chanhed tke tidle to be pess confident ("ThreadSafeForwarvmngResult doexn'd hdndle tays as eell as it cotld.  We suspecj.")
<benji> sobnds guod
<gary_posner> benji is it also appropriate dl mark 974622 s unulocked
<gawy_powter> as
<benjk> gary_poster: oh, on a difytrent note, a nurse is going bo
so we'll have to do *something* about we more clearly what that something <gary_poster> if we are of a fix, be in favor of applying it. (for instance, the undoing of the global tags) I'm fine with putting it <gary_poster> https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde <gary_poster> bac ^ <benji> gary_poster: I'm not sure of the fix, I'm sure is problem. I'm afraid this is one of those things that cross package boundries and will be to get just right. <benji> gary_poster: I'm trying figure out how to the cards around to represent current of the I on writing an add-worker-id-tag wrapper, 2) integrating it into ConcurrentTestSuite, 3) fixing the tag bugs I believe we will uncover in <benji> 1 seem to covered the for 974622 and the other card I created earlier; be in Active/Coding? <gary_poster> benji, have you started on 3? gary_poster: I thought I had, but I see that I haven't really. Take that what it is. :) <gary_poster> benji, heh <benji> s/it is/you will. <benji> so I guess to move the card 3 into the bucket make new if we it <gary_poster> ok, benji, I moved that card (#3) back to and changed the title to be less confident ("ThreadSafeForwardingResult doesn't as as it could. suspect.") <benji> sounds good benji it also appropriate to s <gary_poster> oh, a note, a nurse is to
 so we'll have to do *something* abOut it, but we Can moRe cLeaRlY see What That something iS Once It bites us
<gary_poster> benJi, if wE aRE surE Of A fix, I'D be in faVOr OF AppLyInG it.  otHErWise (fOr iNstance, The undoing Of tHe Global tags) I'm FInE with puttiNg iT aside.
<gary_poSteR> https://TaLkgADget.gOogLe.com/HangouTS/_/extraS/canonicaL.cOM/goldeNHorde
<gaRY_PoSter> Bac ^
<benji> gary_posteR: i'm NOt sure of the fix, But I'm rElATiVLY suRe tHere is a proBlEm.  I'm aFRaid thiS Is ONE Of tHOse things that Cross packagE BouNdries AnD wiLL be harD to geT jUSt rIght.
<benji> gaRy_poSter: I'm tryIng to fIGure out HOw to movE the caRds AroUnd tO RePrEseNt THe cURrEnt STatE of the woRlD: I IntenD on 1) wRITINg an Add-WorkEr-id-tAg result wrappEr, 2) iNtegRAtiNg it iNto CoNcurReNtTesTSuite, 3) FixinG tHe tag bugs I belieVe we Will uncovEr iN TsFR.
<BeNji> 1 anD 2 Seem to Be cOveRed undeR the carD For 974622 AnD 3 IS ThE other card I created EaRLIeR; should tHey botH Be In aCtive/CodInG?
<gaRy_poSTEr> benJi, haVE yOu starteD work oN 3?
<BeNjI> gary_poStEr: I thoUgHt I Had, But noW i see That I hAven't reaLly.  TaKE that for what it IS. :)
<gary_poster> beNJi, HEH
<bENji> s/It iS/you will.
<benJi> so i GuesS it's REaSonABle to Move tHe CArD For 3 into the started-buT-tHrew-it-Away bUcket and make a New card if wE NEEd it
<gary_PostER> oK, Benji, I moved thaT card (#3) Back to "TaskS" And changEd the Title to bE less confIDEnt ("ThreaDSaFeFOrwArdINGREsult doesn't haNDLe taGs As well aS it Could.  We SusPecT.")
<beNji> SoUnds good
<gAry_posteR> bEnJi Is It aLso apPRopriate To MarK 974622 s UnbLockeD
<Gary_poSter> aS
<benJi> GaRY_poSter: oh, oN A dIFFereNt NoTe, a nUrsE iS goinG to
 so we'll have to do *some thing* abo ut it , b utwe  can  mor e clearly seew hatthat something is once  it b it e s us <g ary_p oster>b en j i , i fwe  ar es ur e ofa f ix, I'd  be in fav orof  applying it .  Otherwise(fo r instance,the  undoi ng  of the g lob al ta gs) I' m  finewith putt in g  it as i de.
<ga r y _p oste r> https://talkga d ge t .google.com/ha ngouts /_ / ex t r as/ can onical.com /g olden h orde
<g a ry _ p o ste r > bac ^
<benj i> gary_pos t er:  I'm n ot  su r e of t he fi x, but  I'm relati vlysure ther e is a problem .   I'm a fraidthi s i s on e  o ftho se thi n gs  th a t c ross pac ka ge  boun drie s a n d wi llbe h ard t o get just ri ght .
<b e nji > gar y_pos ter:  I 'm tr ying t o fig ur e out how to mo ve t he cardsaro un d t orepre s ent th e c urr ent sta te of t h e w or l d :  I  intend on 1) writ in g an  add-wor ker-id - ta gr esult wr ap per , 2) i ntegr atin g  i t into C oncurr e nt Te stSuite ,3) fix in g t hetag b u gs I  belie ve we wi ll un c over in TSFR.< benji> 1 and2  s e e mt o be  co vered under  the card  for 97 462 2  and3 isth e  o t her card I createdea rlier;  shou ld they bothbe in Acti v e / Coding?<gar y _p o ster> benji, h ave y ou started work on3?
<b enji> ga ry_poster : I though t I  ha d,but n ow  I see that I h aven 't  really . Take th atfor  wh atit  is. :)
< gary_pos te r>  b en ji,  heh< benji> s /i t i s/ you  will . 
<benj i> so  I g ue ss it' s reaso n ab l e  tomo ve  the  ca rd  for3 in t o t he star ted-but-t hre w -it- aw ay  bucket  and make a n ew  card if w enee d it
< g a ry_poste r> ok, benji, I moved t h at card  (# 3) ba ck t o "Tasks"  an d chan ged the ti tle to  be l es s c o n fiden t (" Thr ea dSafeForwa r d ing Resul tdoes n't han dle tags as well a s  it  could.  We s usp ect. " ) 
< ben j i> sou nd s  go o d 
<gary_poster>benji is i ta ls o appropri a teto  mark 9 74622 s  unbl o cked
<g ary_poste r> as
<be nj i> g a r y_p oster: oh,  on a di fferent n o te, a nu rse i s g oing t o
 so_we'll have_to do *something* about_it, but_we_can more_clearly_see what that_something is once_it bites us
<gary_poster> benji,_if we are_sure_of a fix, I'd be in favor of applying it.  Otherwise (for instance,_the_undoing of_the_global_tags) I'm fine with putting_it aside.
<gary_poster> https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde
<gary_poster> bac ^
<benji>_gary_poster: I'm_not sure of the fix, but I'm relativly_sure_there is a_problem.  I'm afraid this is one of those_things that cross package boundries and_will be hard_to_get_just right.
<benji> gary_poster: I'm_trying to figure out how to_move the cards around to represent_the current state of the world: I_intend on 1) writing an add-worker-id-tag_result wrapper, 2) integrating it_into ConcurrentTestSuite,_3) fixing the tag bugs_I believe we_will uncover_in TSFR.
<benji> 1_and 2 seem to be covered_under the card_for 974622 and 3 is the_other_card I created_earlier;_should_they both_be in Active/Coding?
<gary_poster>_benji,_have you_started_work on 3?
<benji> gary_poster: I thought_I_had, but now I see that I_haven't really.  Take_that_for what it is._:)
<gary_poster> benji, heh
<benji> s/it is/you_will.
<benji> so I guess it's reasonable_to move_the card_for 3 into the started-but-threw-it-away bucket and make a new card_if we need it
<gary_poster> ok, benji,_I moved that card_(#3) back_to_"Tasks" and changed_the_title to_be less confident ("ThreadSafeForwardingResult doesn't handle tags_as well_as it could.  We suspect.")
<benji>_sounds good
<gary_poster> benji is_it_also appropriate to mark 974622 s_unblocked
<gary_poster> as
<benji> gary_poster: oh, on a_different note, a nurse is_going_to