
<racarr> Agh, right I'll do that
<lupine_85> so it's the copying and beryl.1
* tsmithe listens to the busying of packagers
<imbrandon> tsmithe, wonderfull sound isnt it
<racarr> and beryl-xgl.1 presumambly lupine
<crimsun> ls
<crimsun> err, sorry
<lupine_85> racarr: mm, that doesn't actually get installed right now but what the hel
<tsmithe> imbrandon, yup :P
<racarr> lupine_85: I'll have manpage patches in just a second
<lupine_85> well, for licensing it's apply to branch & make a new tarball...
<racarr>?
<racarr> oh
<racarr> right
<racarr> well, ehhhhh I don't know
<racarr> a lot of manpages don't have the license...
<racarr> ah beryl-xgl.1 is just beryl.1
<racarr> lupine_85: http://people.freedesktop.org/~racarr/man.patch
<imbrandon> crimsun, lupine_85 : as far as building / versioning  and lintian/linda on the source/binarys -core seems ok
<imbrandon> so as soon as the last bit of stuff crimsun points out it will be ready
<racarr> lupine_85: I think that is fine as a debian/patch, I mean I will apply it to core but
<racarr> err, I mean master, and I just did
<lupine_85> racarr: we can't patch over the address
<racarr> lupine_85: Why?
<racarr> err
<racarr> why do we even include a fully copy of the GPL?
<racarr> full
<lupine_85> erm. presumably because then the old address is still there. And because we're required to by the terms of the license
<racarr>...doi that's right
<racarr> ironic
<crimsun> right, if you don't include the full text of the GPL, that's an instant reject by
< racarr > Agh, right I'll do that 
 < lupine_85 > so it's the copying and beryl.1 
 * tsmithe listens to the busying of packagers 
 < imbrandon > tsmithe, wonderfull sound is nt it 
 < racarr > and beryl - xgl.1 presumambly lupine 
 < crimsun > ls 
 < crimsun > err, good-for-nothing 
 < lupine_85 > racarr: mm, that doesn't actually get install right now but what the hel 
 < tsmithe > imbrandon, yup :P 
 < racarr > lupine_85: I'll have manpage plot in just a second 
 < lupine_85 > well, for licensing it's give to arm & make a fresh tarball... 
 < racarr >? 
 < racarr > oh 
 < racarr > right 
 < racarr > well, ehhhhh I don't know 
 < racarr > a lot of manpages don't get the license... 
 < racarr > ah beryl - xgl.1 is just beryl.1 
 < racarr > lupine_85: http://people.freedesktop.org/~racarr/man.patch 
 < imbrandon > crimsun, lupine_85: as far as building / versioning   and lintian / linda on the source / binarys -core seems ok 
 < imbrandon > so equally soon as the last bit of stuff crimsun orient out it will be ready 
 < racarr > lupine_85: I think that is all right as a debian / patch, I mean I will enforce it to core but 
 < racarr > err, I intend master, and I just did 
 < lupine_85 > racarr: we can't piece over the address 
 < racarr > lupine_85: Why? 
 < racarr > err 
 < racarr > why do we even include a fully copy of the GPL? 
 < racarr > full 
 < lupine_85 > erm. presumably because then the old address is still there. And because we're required to by the terms of the license 
 < racarr>... doi that's right 
 < racarr > ironic 
 < crimsun > right, if you don't include the full text of the GPL, that's an instant reject by

<racwrr> Agh, right I'll do thau
<lupine_85> so it's thg xopyinj and bsryl.1
* tsmkthe listens to the busying lf packqgers
<imbrandon> tsmithe, wonderfupl sound isnu it
<racarr> and becgl-xgl.1 pvzsumajnly lbpmne
<crimsun> ls
<crlmsun> err, smrry
<lupine_85> racdrf: lm, that doesn't actually get installqd righy jow but what tre htl
<tfmitgv> lmbrandon, yup :P
<racarr> lupine_85: I'll have menpage patches on just a second
<lupine_85> welp, fog licensing it's apoly to branxh & iqke a new tafball...
<racarg>?
<xacarr> oh
<radarr> right
<racarr> well, ehhhhh I aon't lnow
<racarr> a loh of manpagew don'n have the ligvnse...
<racdrr> ah neryl-xgl.1 is juxt ueryo.1
<racarr> lupine_85: http://pemple.freedesktop.org/~tacarr/man.pdteh
<imbrandon> crimsun, lypune_85 : ds fdr ar bukldjnj / bersiojinj  and lintjan/linda on the source/binarys -vowv seems ok
<imbdandon> sj as soon as the last bit of stuff crimvun points out it will be eeady
<racarr> lupine_85: I jhink that is fine as a debian/patch, I mean I will apply it do coce buu
<rqcarr> wrg, I mean master, and I just did
<lupine_85> racarr: wq csn'n patch over the cddress
<racarr> lulije_85: Rhy?
<racarr> err
<tacarr> cgy do we even includf a fuljy copy of the GPL?
<tacarr> full
<lupine_85> erm. presunably becausv thwn the old address is still tkere. Amd bevause we're required to yy the terms of tje licenss
<facarr>...doi that's figmt
<rdcarr> ironic
<crimsun> right, yf you doi't inelude thd fukl texe of the GOL, that's an instant rejeft by
<racarr> Agh, right I'll do that <lupine_85> the and beryl.1 tsmithe listens to tsmithe, sound isnt it and beryl-xgl.1 presumambly <crimsun> ls <crimsun> err, sorry <lupine_85> mm, that doesn't actually get installed right now but what the hel <tsmithe> yup :P <racarr> lupine_85: I'll have manpage patches in just a second <lupine_85> for it's to & make a new tarball... <racarr>? <racarr> oh <racarr> right <racarr> well, ehhhhh I don't know a lot of manpages don't have the license... ah beryl-xgl.1 is just <racarr> lupine_85: http://people.freedesktop.org/~racarr/man.patch <imbrandon> crimsun, : far as / and on the source/binarys seems ok <imbrandon> so as soon as the last bit of stuff crimsun points out it will ready <racarr> think that fine a I mean I it to core but <racarr> err, and I just did <lupine_85> racarr: we can't over the <racarr> lupine_85: Why? <racarr> err <racarr> do we even include a fully copy of GPL? <racarr> full <lupine_85> erm. presumably because then the old address is still there. And required to by the of the license that's <racarr> <crimsun> if you include the full text of the GPL, that's an instant reject

<racarr> Agh, right I'll do that
<luPine_85> so it's tHe copYinG anD bEryl.1
* TsmiThe listens to thE BusyIng of packagers
<imbrandoN> tsmiThE, WondERfUll soUnd isnt IT
<rACArr> AnD bEryL-xGL.1 pResumAmbLy lupinE
<crimsun> ls
<CriMsUn> err, sorry
<luPInE_85> racarr: mm, tHat Doesn't actualLy gEt instAlLed RIght nOw bUt whaT the heL
<TsmithE> imbrandoN, yUP :P
<racaRR> lupine_85: i'LL hAve mAnpage patches in juST a SEcond
<lupine_85> welL, for liCeNSiNG It's AppLy to branch & MaKe a neW Tarball...
<RAcARR>?
<RacARr> oh
<racarr> rigHt
<racarr> welL, EhhHhh I doN't KnoW
<Racarr> A lot oF mANpaGes don't have The lIcense...
<racArr> ah bERyl-xgl.1 iS Just berYl.1
<racaRr> lUpiNe_85: htTP://pEoPle.FrEEdeSKtOp.oRG/~raCarr/man.pAtCh
<ImbraNdon> CRIMSun, lUpiNe_85 : as Far as Building / versiOniNg  anD LinTian/lInda oN the SoUrce/bInarys -Core sEeMs ok
<imbrandon> so As soOn as the laSt bIt Of sTuFf criMSun poiNts Out It will bE ready
<rACarR> lUPINe_85: i think that is fine as A dEBIaN/patch, I mEan I wiLL aPpLY it to corE bUt
<rAcarR> ERr, I meAn maSTeR, and I jusT did
<luPInE_85> rAcarr: we CaN't patcH oVer The AddreSS
<racArr> lupIne_85: Why?
<raCarr> eRR
<racarr> why do we EVen include a fuLLy COPy OF the gPL?
<Racarr> full
<lUpinE_85> Erm. pResuMAbLy bECause Then tHe OLd ADdress is still there. ANd BecausE we're Required to by tHe terms of tHE LIcense
<raCarr>...DOi THat's right
<racarR> ironIc
<crimsun> rIGht, if you Don't iNclude thE full text OF The GPL, thAt's An iNstAnt REJeCt by

<racarr> Agh, right I'lldo that
<l upine _85 > s oit's  the  copying and b e ryl. 1
* tsmithe listens to  thebu s ying of  pack agers
< i mb r a ndo n>  t smi th e ,wonde rfu ll soun d isnt it<ra ca rr> and bery l -x gl.1 presu mam bly lupine
< cri msun>ls 
<c r imsun > e rr, s orry
< l upine_ 85> racar r: mm, th a t doesn ' t  a ctua lly get installed ri g ht now but wha t thehe l 
< t s mit he>  imbrandon ,yup : P 
<racar r >l u p ine _ 85: I'll have  manpage pa t che s in j us t a second 
<lup in e _85 > well, for  lic ensing it 's app l y to br a nch & m ake anew  ta rbal l .. .<ra ca r r>? <r aca r r>oh
<raca rr >right 
<ra c a r r > we ll,  ehh hhh I  don't know
< rac arr> a l ot of  manp ages  d on'thave t he li ce nse...
<racarr>  ahberyl-xgl .1is  ju st  bery l .1
<ra car r>lupine_ 85: htt p :// pe o p l e. freedesktop.org/~r ac a r r/ man.patc h
<imb r an do n > crimsu n,  lu pine _ 8 5 : a s fa r  a s buildi ng / v e rs io ning  a nd  linti an /li nda  on t h e so urce/b inarys - cores eems ok
<imbra n don> so as so o na s  t h e la stbit of stuf f cr i msun  poi n ts  ou t  it w ill b er ea d y
<racarr> lupine_8 5:  I thi nk th at is fine as  a debian/ p a t ch, I me an I wi l l apply it tocorebut
<racar r > err, I  mean  master,  and I ju s t  did
<lu pin e_8 5>rac a r r:  we can't pat c h  ove rthe add res s
<raca rr>  lu pin e_8 5:  Why?
<ra carr> er r<r ac ar r>why d o  we even  i ncl ud e a  full y  copyof th e GP L? 
< r aca rr> ful l 
< l u pine _8 5>  erm . p re sumab ly b e cau se then  the oldadd r essis  s till th ere. And beca us e we're re qu ire d to b y the term s of the license
<racar r >...doi  th at'srigh t
<racarr > i ronic<cr i msun>right,  if y ou  do n ' t inc l u de  th efull texto f  th e GPL ,that 's an i nstant reject by

<racarr> Agh,_right I'll_do that
<lupine_85> so it's_the copying_and_beryl.1
* tsmithe_listens_to the busying_of packagers
<imbrandon> tsmithe,_wonderfull sound isnt it
<racarr>_and beryl-xgl.1 presumambly_lupine
<crimsun>_ls
<crimsun> err, sorry
<lupine_85> racarr: mm, that doesn't actually get installed right now but what_the_hel
<tsmithe> imbrandon,_yup_:P
<racarr>_lupine_85: I'll have manpage patches_in just a second
<lupine_85> well,_for licensing_it's apply to branch & make a new_tarball...
<racarr>?
<racarr>_oh
<racarr> right
<racarr> well,_ehhhhh I don't know
<racarr> a lot of manpages don't_have the license...
<racarr> ah beryl-xgl.1 is_just beryl.1
<racarr> lupine_85:_http://people.freedesktop.org/~racarr/man.patch
<imbrandon>_crimsun,_lupine_85 : as far_as building / versioning  and_lintian/linda on the source/binarys -core seems_ok
<imbrandon> so as soon as the last_bit of stuff crimsun points out_it will be ready
<racarr> lupine_85:_I think_that is fine as a_debian/patch, I mean_I will_apply it to_core but
<racarr> err, I mean master,_and I just_did
<lupine_85> racarr: we can't patch over_the_address
<racarr> lupine_85: Why?
<racarr>_err
<racarr>_why_do we_even include a_fully_copy of_the_GPL?
<racarr> full
<lupine_85> erm. presumably because then_the_old address is still there. And because_we're required to by_the_terms of the license
<racarr>...doi_that's right
<racarr> ironic
<crimsun> right, if_you don't include the full text_of the_GPL, that's_an instant reject by