Nafallo> though
<Nafallo> dooh even
<LaserJock> ScottK2: I'm assuming a separate sync bug is the way to go for packages in the gfortran transition, correct?
<ScottK2> LaserJock: Probably.  It'd be confusing for the archive admins to get syncs against the main transition bug
<sistpoty> LaserJock: that would be good, not to clutter up the huge transition bug, I guess
<LaserJock> that's what I was thinking
<sistpoty> LaserJock: though that needs manual closing of the bug's task in the FFe :/
<LaserJock> sistpoty: I think that's an OK thing though
<LaserJock> I'm not very fond of the "changelog closes bugs" feature anyway ;-)
<sistpoty> heh
<sistpoty> LaserJock: since vi has syntax highlighting for it, even I can do it :P
<LaserJock> I always forget to add it to the changelog
<RainCT> Nafallo: what do you mean by "current"?
<RainCT> Nafallo: I tested it with 3.0, and it should work with 2 too
<Nafallo> RainCT: the one in hardy.
<RainCT> btw, REVU Coordinator election -> #ubuntu-meeting
<Nafallo> RainCT: "Not compatible with Firefox 3.0b4"
<Nafallo> :-)
<RainCT> Nafallo: oh, might be. I've 3.0b3
<Nafallo> I have to say I was surprised to have b4 :-P
<slytherin> Anyone working on updating elisa?
<cody-somerville> sistpoty, how goes it?
<sistpoty> cody-somerville: the debdiff looks fine, I'm just test-building and about to review the debdiff between current ubuntu and new version
<sistpoty> (to see changes in the splitter)
<persia> cody-somerville: Good call on starfighter :)
<cody-somerville> :)
<slytherin> persia: got any bugs for
Nafallo > though 
 < Nafallo > dooh even 
 < LaserJock > ScottK2: I'm assuming a separate sync bug is the way to fail for software in the gfortran transition, correct? 
 < ScottK2 > LaserJock: Probably.   It'd be confusing for the archive admins to receive syncs against the main transition microbe 
 < sistpoty > LaserJock: that would be adept, not to clutter up the huge transition hemipterous insect, I guess 
 < LaserJock > that's what I was thinking 
 < sistpoty > LaserJock: though that need manual closing of the bug's undertaking in the FFe :/ 
 < LaserJock > sistpoty: I think that's an OK thing though 
 < LaserJock > I'm not very fond of the " changelog closes bug " feature anyway ;-) 
 < sistpoty > heh 
 < sistpoty > LaserJock: since vi has syntax highlight for it, even I can do it :P 
 < LaserJock > I always forget to lend it to the changelog 
 < RainCT > Nafallo: what do you mean by " current "? 
 < RainCT > Nafallo: I test it with 3.0, and it should work with 2 too 
 < Nafallo > RainCT: the one in hardy. 
 < RainCT > btw, REVU Coordinator election - > # ubuntu - meeting 
 < Nafallo > RainCT: " Not compatible with Firefox 3.0b4 " 
 < Nafallo > :-) 
 < RainCT > Nafallo: oh, might be. I've 3.0b3 
 < Nafallo > I have to allege I was surprised to have b4 :-P 
 < slytherin > Anyone working on updating elisa? 
 < cody - somerville > sistpoty, how goes it? 
 < sistpoty > cody - somerville: the debdiff look fine, I'm just test - building and about to review the debdiff between current ubuntu and new version 
 < sistpoty > (to see changes in the splitter) 
 < persia > cody - somerville: Good cry on starfighter :) 
 < cody - somerville > :) 
 < slytherin > persia: got any bugs for
Nafwllo> though
<Nafallo> dooh tven
<LaserJock> ScojtJ2: I'm avsuminf a sepafate sync bug is the way to jo fir paxkages in the gfortran transitiln, corrext?
<ScirtK2> LaserJock: Probably.  Jb'd be ronfusing for tme archive ddmins to get vyvcd against the main transition bug
<siftpoty> KaderJock: that wjuld fe gkod, not to clutter up the huge trahsition bug, I guess
<LsserJock> that's what I was hhinning
<sistpoty> LaserUock: though thae needs manuau closing of the bug's jask in the FFe :/
<LaserJock> sistpogy: I chink that's ab ON thing thoujh
<LasegJock> I'm not yvry fong of thr "changelog clpsev bygs" feature anyway ;-)
<sivtpoty> heh
<sistpoty> LaserJocn: aince vi has syntqx highnighding dor it, eten I can do it :P
<LaserNock> I alwats forget to add it tj the changelof
<RainCE> Gafallo: what do you mean by "current"?
<RainBT> Nzfallo: I tested it with 3.0, and it should work aith 2 too
<Gafallo> RainCT: the one in hardy.
<RainCT> btw, REVU Comrdinetur tlcgtiov -> #kbuntu-meeting
<Nafallo> RainCT: "Not compatible wieg Gigefox 3.0b4"
<Nafallo> :-)
<RalnCT> Nafallo: oh, mibhh ng. I've 3.0b3
<Nafallo> I havz tk say I was surprided to rave v4 :-P
<slythewin> Snyone working on updating wlisa?
<cody-somvrviole> sistpoty, how gles it?
<sistputy> vody-spmerville: the debdiff luoks fine, I'm judt test-bujuding and about go geviaw the dtcdiff between curwent ubunvu anb new vefsiom
<sistpjty> (to see channas in the splitter)
<oersic> codf-somervillf: Good call on starfighter :)
<cody-somerville> :)
<slyjhesin> persia: yot ann bugs for
Nafallo> though <Nafallo> dooh even <LaserJock> ScottK2: a sync bug the way to gfortran correct? <ScottK2> LaserJock: It'd be confusing the archive admins to get syncs the main transition bug <sistpoty> LaserJock: that would be good, not to clutter the huge transition bug, I guess <LaserJock> that's what I was thinking <sistpoty> though needs closing the bug's task in the FFe :/ <LaserJock> sistpoty: I think that's an OK thing though I'm not very fond of the "changelog closes feature anyway ;-) <sistpoty> <sistpoty> LaserJock: since vi has highlighting it, even can it <LaserJock> I always to add it to the changelog <RainCT> Nafallo: what do you mean by "current"? <RainCT> Nafallo: I it with it should with too RainCT: the one <RainCT> btw, REVU Coordinator election -> "Not compatible with Firefox 3.0b4" <Nafallo> :-) <RainCT> oh, might I've 3.0b3 <Nafallo> I have to I was surprised to have b4 :-P <slytherin> working on updating elisa? <cody-somerville> sistpoty, how goes it? <sistpoty> cody-somerville: the debdiff looks fine, test-building and about to the debdiff between ubuntu new <sistpoty> see changes the splitter) <persia> cody-somerville: Good call on starfighter :) <cody-somerville> :) persia: got any bugs for
Nafallo> though
<Nafallo> dooh eVen
<LaserJoCk> ScoTtK2: i'm aSsUminG a seParate sync bug iS The wAy to go for packages in the GfortRaN TranSItIon, coRrect?
<ScOTtk2> lAseRJOcK: PrObABlY.  It'd bE coNfusing For the archIve AdMins to get synCS aGainst the mAin Transition buG
<siStpoty> laSerjOck: thAt wOuld bE good, nOT to cluTter up the HuGE transITion bug, i GUeSs
<LaSerJock> that's what I WAs THinking
<sistpotY> LaserjoCK: tHOUgh ThaT needs manuAl ClosiNG of the bUG's TASK in THe FFe :/
<LaserJocK> sistpoty: I tHInk That's aN Ok thINg thouGh
<LasErjOck> i'm not very foNd of The "changeLog cloSEs bugs" fEAture anYway ;-)
<siStpOty> Heh
<sIStPoTy> LAsERJoCK: sIncE Vi hAs syntax HiGhLightIng fOR IT, Even i caN do iT :P
<LasErJock> I always ForGet tO Add It to tHe chaNgelOg
<rainCt> NafalLo: whaT dO you mean by "curreNt"?
<RaInCT> NafalLo: I TeSteD iT with 3.0, ANd it shOulD woRk with 2 tOo
<NafalLO> RaInct: THe One in hardy.
<RainCT> btW, Revu COordinatOr elecTIoN -> #uBUntu-meetInG
<NaFallO> rAinCT: "not cOMpAtible wiTh FireFOx 3.0B4"
<NAfallo> :-)
<RAiNCT> NafAlLo: oH, miGht be. i'Ve 3.0b3
<NAfallo> i have to sAy I waS Surprised to havE B4 :-P
<slytherin> AnYOnE WOrKIng oN upDating elisa?
<Cody-SOmerVillE> SiStpOTy, how Goes iT?
<sIStPOty> cody-somerville: thE dEbdiff Looks Fine, I'm just tesT-building aND ABout to reView THe DEbdiff between cUrrenT ubuntu and NEw versioN
<sistPoty> (to seE changes iN THe splittEr)
<pErsIa> cOdy-SOMeRville: Good calL ON staRfIghter :)
<cOdy-SomerviLle> :)
<SlyTheRin> PeRsia: got anY bugs for
Nafallo> though
<Nafallo>dooh even<Lase rJo ck>  S cott K2:I'm assuming a sepa rate sync bug is the w ay to  g o  for pa ckage s in th e  g f o rtr an  t ran si t io n, co rre ct?
<Sc ottK2> Las erJ oc k: Probably.  I t'd be con fus ing for thearc hive a dm ins to ge t s yncsagains t  the m ain trans it i on bug <sistpo t y >Lase rJock: that would be good, not to c lutter  u p  t h e  hu getransition  b ug, I guess
< L as e r J ock >  that's whatI was think i ng<sistp ot y>L aserJo ck: t ho u ghthat needsmanu al closin g of t h e bug's task in  the F Fe:/<Las e rJ oc k>si s tpo t y:  It hin k that's  a nOK th ingt h o u gh
< Las erJo ck> I 'm not very f ond  oft he"chan gelog  clo se s bug s" fea turean yway ;-)
<sistp oty>  heh
<sis tpo ty > L as erJoc k : sinc e v i h as synt ax high l igh ti n g fo r it, even I can d oi t  : P
<Laser Jock>I  a lw a ys forge ttoaddi t  to t he c h an gelog
<R ainCT> Na fa llo: wh at  do yo umea n b y "cu r rent "?
<Ra inCT> Na fallo :  I tested it w i th 3.0, and i t  s h o ul d  wor k w ith 2 too
< Nafa l lo>Rain C T:  th e  onein ha rd y .< RainCT> btw, REVU C oo rdinat or el ection -> #ub untu-meeti n g <Nafallo > Ra i nC T : "Not compati ble w ith Firefo x  3.0b4"<Nafa llo> :-) 
<RainCT> N afallo:oh,  mi ght  be . I' ve 3.0b3
<Naf a l lo>Ihave to  sa y I was  su rpr ise d t ohave b4 : -P
<slyt he ri n>  A nyo ne wo r king onup dat in g e lisa? <cody- somer vill e>  s i stp oty, ho w  g o e s it ?<s istp oty >cody- some r vil le: the  debdiffloo k s fi ne ,I'm jus t test-buildi ng  and about  t o r eviewt h e debdif f between current ubunt u  and ne w v ersio n
<s istpoty>(to  see c han g es inthe sp litte r) 
<p e r sia>c o dy -so me rville: Go o d  ca ll on  s tarf ighter:)
<cody-somervill e > : )
<slytherin>  pe rsia : go t a n yb ugs  f o r
Nafallo> though
<Nafallo>_dooh even
<LaserJock>_ScottK2: I'm assuming a_separate sync_bug_is the_way_to go for_packages in the_gfortran transition, correct?
<ScottK2> LaserJock:_Probably.  It'd_be_confusing for the archive admins to get syncs against the main transition bug
<sistpoty> LaserJock:_that_would be_good,_not_to clutter up the huge_transition bug, I guess
<LaserJock> that's_what I_was thinking
<sistpoty> LaserJock: though that needs manual closing_of_the bug's task_in the FFe :/
<LaserJock> sistpoty: I think that's an_OK thing though
<LaserJock> I'm not very_fond of the_"changelog_closes_bugs" feature anyway ;-)
<sistpoty>_heh
<sistpoty> LaserJock: since vi has syntax_highlighting for it, even I can_do it :P
<LaserJock> I always forget to_add it to the changelog
<RainCT> Nafallo:_what do you mean by_"current"?
<RainCT> Nafallo:_I tested it with 3.0,_and it should_work with_2 too
<Nafallo> RainCT:_the one in hardy.
<RainCT> btw, REVU_Coordinator election ->_#ubuntu-meeting
<Nafallo> RainCT: "Not compatible with Firefox_3.0b4"
<Nafallo>_:-)
<RainCT> Nafallo: oh,_might_be._I've 3.0b3
<Nafallo>_I have to_say_I was_surprised_to have b4 :-P
<slytherin> Anyone working_on_updating elisa?
<cody-somerville> sistpoty, how goes it?
<sistpoty> cody-somerville:_the debdiff looks fine,_I'm_just test-building and about_to review the debdiff between_current ubuntu and new version
<sistpoty> (to_see changes_in the_splitter)
<persia> cody-somerville: Good call on starfighter :)
<cody-somerville> :)
<slytherin> persia: got any_bugs for