/+archive/firefox-next)
<jokerdino> coolios.
<technoviking> jokerdino: the LTS should get many of the future FF updates
<technoviking> asking for a $500,00 VMWare/SAN solution at work. Lets see how this lead ballon flys
<jokerdino> good news that is.
<stgraber> tumbleweed, Rhonda: only added irssi and logcheck as beep is in universe
<shadeslayer> ScottK: hmm, I agree with that email, kile should pull in texlive-latex-extra
<ScottK> shadeslayer: OK.  First thing, I'd reply to the mail and say you are looking into it.
<shadeslayer> ok
<tumbleweed> stgraber: ta
<wookey> If I find a cross-build issue that is the same in Debian and Ubuntu, and there isn;t already an ubuntuN package version should I still file two bugs and patches and link them?
<wookey> (the ubuntu patch only being differnt by dint of chanigng maintainer field and addingan ubuntuN to the version number
<micahg> wookey: if the Debian fix will get in quickly, I'd just suggest filing there and syncing (asking for FFe if necessary) when fixed
<micahg> wookey: unless it's on an image
<wookey> OK, so the sync stuff can only happen after the debian package is uploaded - there is no 'pre-emptive' version.
<wookey> the thin is you never know how long the debian upload will take...
<micahg> wookey: well, there's no need for it unless the fix is needed immediately
<micahg> or it's on an image and you want to insure it's fixed for precise
<wookey> OK. I'll try filing a few in Debian and give it a week
<wookey> BTW two out of threee of the 'ARM porting jam' multiarch fixes are in http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ by whatever magic makes that happen. Not sure why not the 3rd?
<wookey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/
/+archive / firefox - next) 
 < jokerdino > coolios. 
 < technoviking > jokerdino: the LTS should get many of the future FF updates 
 < technoviking > asking for a $ 500,00 VMWare / SAN solution at workplace. lashkar-e-taiba see how this lead ballon flys 
 < jokerdino > good news that is. 
 < stgraber > tumbleweed, Rhonda: only added irssi and logcheck as beep is in population 
 < shadeslayer > ScottK: hmm, I agree with that email, kile should pull in texlive - latex paint - supernumerary 
 < ScottK > shadeslayer: OK.   First thing, I'd reply to the mail and say you are look into it. 
 < shadeslayer > ok 
 < tumbleweed > stgraber: ta 
 < wookey > If I find a cross - build issue that is the same in Debian and Ubuntu, and there isn;t already an ubuntuN package version should I however file two bugs and patches and yoke them? 
 < wookey > (the ubuntu patch only being differnt by dint of chanigng maintainer field and addingan ubuntuN to the adaptation number 
 < micahg > wookey: if the Debian fix will get in quickly, I'd just indicate filing there and syncing (asking for FFe if necessary) when fixed 
 < micahg > wookey: unless it's on an image 
 < wookey > OK, so the sync stuff can only happen after the debian package is uploaded - there is no' pre - emptive' version. 
 < wookey > the thin is you never know how long the debian upload will take... 
 < micahg > wookey: well, there's no need for it unless the repair is needed immediately 
 < micahg > or it's on an image and you desire to cover it's fixate for precise 
 < wookey > OK. I'll try file a few in Debian and pass it a week 
 < wookey > BTW two out of threee of the' ARM porting jamming' multiarch fixes are in http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ by whatever magic makes that happen. Not sure why not the 3rd? 
 < wookey > https://bugs.launchpad.net/
/+arcjive/firefox-next)
<jokerdino> coolios.
<technovnjing> jmkerdiho: the LGS should get many of the fuvure FF ukbates
<technoviking> asying for w $500,00 VMWarw/SAN wolution av work. Lccs ses how vhis lead ballok flys
<jokergino> good news tfac is.
<stgraber> tumbleweed, Rhonda: only wdded itsdi and logchech as feep ps in universe
<shadeslayer> ScottI: hmm, I agree with tnat email, kile should pull in hexlive-latex-extra
<SfottK> shadewlayqe: OK.  First ghing, I'd rtpny to the jail and say you are looking ingo it.
<xhadeslayet> kk
<hombleweed> stjraber: ta
<wookey> If I find d cross-nuild issue thst ms tye same in Debian and Ubuntu, and there ysn;t alreddv an ubuntuN package ceesion shogld K stkll fmle two bkgs and patchss and link them?
<wookey> (the ubumtt patch only bsing dyfsernt by dint of chanigng maintainer fitld ahd addingan ubuntuN to rhe version number
<micwhg> wooker: if the Debian fix will get in quickly, I'd just sgggesv wilnkn thdee and syncing (asking for FFe if necessary) when ricec
<micahg> wookey: unless it's oj sg image
<wookey> OK, so ths sync stuff can ojly hapken afrer the dtbian package is uploaded - there is no 'pre-emitivw' version.
<wookey> thz thin is yob nevet know how long the debian upuoad will take...
<mlcahg> wooidy: well, there's nu nved xor it unless the fix is nqeded immxdiatzly
<micahe> or it's og an image and nmu want to insure lt's fnxed xor precisf
<wookey> OK. I'll try filing a few in Debian and ghve it a wezk
<wookcy> BTW two out jf threee of tke 'ARM pjrtine jam' multparch fixxs are in htep://reqorts.qa.ubgjtu.com/reportv/sponsoryng/ vy wyatever oagic makes thst happen. Not sure qhy not the 3rd?
<wookcy> htjpa://bugs.launchpad.nzu/
/+archive/firefox-next) <jokerdino> coolios. <technoviking> jokerdino: the LTS many the future updates <technoviking> asking at Lets see how lead ballon flys good news that is. <stgraber> tumbleweed, only added irssi and logcheck as beep is in universe <shadeslayer> ScottK: hmm, agree with that email, kile should pull in texlive-latex-extra <ScottK> shadeslayer: OK. First I'd to mail say you are looking into it. <shadeslayer> ok <tumbleweed> stgraber: ta <wookey> If I find a issue that is the same in Debian and and there isn;t already ubuntuN package version should I file bugs and and them? (the ubuntu patch being differnt by dint of chanigng maintainer field and addingan ubuntuN to the version number <micahg> wookey: the Debian get in I'd suggest there and syncing FFe if necessary) when fixed <micahg> on an image <wookey> OK, so the sync can only after the debian package is uploaded there is no 'pre-emptive' version. <wookey> the thin you never know how long the debian upload will take... <micahg> wookey: well, there's no it unless the fix needed immediately <micahg> it's an and want to it's fixed for precise <wookey> OK. I'll try filing a few Debian and give it a week <wookey> BTW two out of 'ARM porting jam' fixes are in http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ whatever makes that happen. Not not 3rd?
/+archive/firefox-next)
<jokerdiNo> coolios.
<tEchnoVikIng> JoKerdIno: tHe LTS should get MAny oF the future FF updates
<tecHnoviKiNG> askINg For a $500,00 VmWare/SAn SoLUTioN aT wOrk. leTS sEe how ThiS lead baLlon flys
<joKerDiNo> good news thAT iS.
<stgraber> tUmbLeweed, Rhonda: OnlY added IrSsi ANd logCheCk as bEep is iN UniverSe
<shadeslAyER> Scottk: Hmm, I agrEE WiTh thAt email, kile should PUlL In texlive-latex-Extra
<SCoTTK> SHAdeSlaYer: OK.  First ThIng, I'd REply to tHE mAIL And SAy you are lookiNg into it.
<shaDEslAyer> ok
<TuMblEWeed> stGrabeR: tA
<WooKey> If I find a CrosS-build issUe that IS the samE In DebiaN and UbUntU, anD theRE iSn;T alReADy aN UbUntUn paCkage verSiOn ShoulD I stILL FIle tWo bUgs aNd patChes and link thEm?
<wOokeY> (The UbuntU patcH onlY bEing dIffernT by diNt Of chanigng maintAineR field and AddInGan UbUntuN TO the veRsiOn nUmber
<miCahg> wooKEy: iF tHE dEbIan fix will get in quiCkLY, i'd Just suggEst filINg ThERe and synCiNg (aSkinG FOr FFe If neCEsSary) when Fixed
<mICaHg> Wookey: uNlEss it's On An iMagE
<wookEY> OK, sO the syNc stuff cAn onlY Happen after the DEbian package iS UpLOAdED - theRe iS no 'pre-emptiVe' veRSion.
<WookEY> tHe tHIn is yOu nevEr KNoW How long the debian uplOaD will tAke...
<miCahg> wookey: welL, there's no nEED For it unlEss tHE fIX is needed immedIatelY
<micahg> or iT'S on an imaGe and You want tO insure it'S FIxed for pRecIse
<WooKey> ok. i'lL try filing a feW IN DebIaN and givE it A week
<woOkeY> BTw twO ouT oF threee of The 'ARM poRtInG jAm' MulTiarcH Fixes are In HttP://rEqoRts.qa.UBuntu.cOm/repOrts/SpOnSOriNg/ by whaTEvER MagiC mAkEs thAt hApPen. NoT surE Why Not the 3rD?
<wookey> htTps://BUgs.lAuNcHpad.net/
/+archive/firefox-next)
<j okerdino>cooli os. 
<t ec hnov ikin g> jokerdino:t he L TS should get many ofthe f ut u re F F  u pdate s
<tech n ov i k ing >as kin gf or  a $5 00, 00 VMWa re/SAN sol uti on  at work. Le t ssee how th islead ballonfly s
<jok er din o > goo d n ews t hat is . 
<stgr aber> tum bl e weed,R honda:o n ly  add ed irssi and logc h ec k  as beep is in  unive rs e 
< s h ade sla yer> Scott K:  hmm, I agree wi t h tha t  email, kileshould pull intexliv e- lat e x-extr a
<Sc ot t K>shadeslayer : OK .  Firstthing, I'd rep l y to th e mail  an d s ay y o uar e l oo k ing in toi t.<shadesl ay er > ok<tum b l e w eed>  st grab er: t a
<wookey> If  Ifind a c ross- build  iss ue  that  is th e sam ein Debian and U bunt u, and th ere  i sn; talrea d y an u bun tuN  packag e versi o n s ho u l d  I  still file two bu gs a nd  patches  and l i nk  t h em?
<woo ke y>(the u buntu  pat c honly bei ng dif f er nt  by din tof cha ni gng  ma intai n er f ield a nd addin gan u b untuN to the v e rsion number< mi c a hg >  woo key : if the De bian fixwill ge t i n  quic kly,I' d  j u st suggest filing t he re and  sync ing (asking f or FFe ifn e c essary)when fi x ed
<micahg> wo okey:  unless it ' s on animage 
<wookey > OK, sot h e sync s tuf f c anonl y ha ppen after th e debi an  packag e i s uploa ded  -the reis  no 'pre- emptive'  v er si on .
< wooke y > the th in  is  y ounever know h ow lo ng t he  d e bia n uploa d  w i l l ta ke .. .
<m ica hg > woo key: wel l, ther e's no ne edf or i tun less th e fix is need ed  immediate ly 
<m icahg> o r it's o n an image and you want to insu reit'sfixe d for pre cis e
<woo key >  OK. I 'll tr y fil in g a f ew in D eb ian  a nd give it a  we ek
<w oo key>  BTW tw o out of threee of the  'ARM porting  ja m' m u l ti arc h  f i xes  a r e i n http://reqorts. qa.ubuntu. co m /r eports/spo n sor in g/ by w hatever  magi c  makesthat happ en. Not s ur e wh y not  the 3rd?<wookey>  https:// b ugs.l a un chpad .ne t/
/+archive/firefox-next)
<jokerdino> coolios.
<technoviking>_jokerdino: the_LTS should get many_of the_future_FF updates
<technoviking>_asking_for a $500,00_VMWare/SAN solution at_work. Lets see how_this lead ballon_flys
<jokerdino>_good news that is.
<stgraber> tumbleweed, Rhonda: only added irssi and logcheck as beep is_in_universe
<shadeslayer> ScottK:_hmm,_I_agree with that email, kile_should pull in texlive-latex-extra
<ScottK> shadeslayer:_OK. _First thing, I'd reply to the mail and_say_you are looking_into it.
<shadeslayer> ok
<tumbleweed> stgraber: ta
<wookey> If I find a_cross-build issue that is the same_in Debian and_Ubuntu,_and_there isn;t already an_ubuntuN package version should I still_file two bugs and patches and_link them?
<wookey> (the ubuntu patch only being_differnt by dint of chanigng maintainer_field and addingan ubuntuN to_the version_number
<micahg> wookey: if the Debian_fix will get_in quickly,_I'd just suggest_filing there and syncing (asking for_FFe if necessary)_when fixed
<micahg> wookey: unless it's on_an_image
<wookey> OK, so_the_sync_stuff can_only happen after_the_debian package_is_uploaded - there is no 'pre-emptive'_version.
<wookey>_the thin is you never know how_long the debian upload_will_take...
<micahg> wookey: well, there's_no need for it unless_the fix is needed immediately
<micahg> or_it's on_an image_and you want to insure it's fixed for precise
<wookey> OK. I'll_try filing a few in Debian_and give it a_week
<wookey> BTW_two_out of threee_of_the 'ARM_porting jam' multiarch fixes are in http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/_by whatever_magic makes that happen. Not sure_why not the 3rd?
<wookey>_https://bugs.launchpad.net/