 as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: cool, I'll get cracking on this process as well
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: Great. I won't be able to do anything as a sponsor for now, until the freeze exception is granted, and that likely won't happen during my patch pilot duty time today. If it does, I'll have a look of course.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: so, I'll put the latest charm-tools, charmworldlib and amulet in to the ppa, file a bug for each, charmworldlib and amulet for acceptance by an MOTU, then one for charm-tools ffe? or do I need an FFE for all three?
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: You probably need an FFE for all, since they are considered new upstream releases, but particularly for the new package since it is not in the archive yet.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: ack, I'll open an FFE for all three then
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: Thank you.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: so,the FFE guide says I should still have a MOTU review the package
<marcoceppi> for the two "new" packages
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: As far as I understand things, there is no point reviewing the package unless it has been given an exception, although I haven't read the document myself in a while, so I may have it wrong.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: that makes sense, the doc says otherwise but I'll wait for ubuntu-release to get back to me
<TheMuso> The way I read that, its not explicit in saying the package needs to be reviewed first, it just says to follow the new packages process.
#ubuntu-motu 2014-03-14
<dholbach> good morning
<dkessel> guten morgen dholbach
<dholbach> hi dkessel
<j_f-f> moin
<ESphynx> hey guys are you going to upgrde freetype for the LTS because there's a nasty double free in the current Trusty version
as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess. 
 < marcoceppi > TheMuso: cool, I'll get cracking on this process equally well 
 < TheMuso > marcoceppi: big. I won't be able to do anything as a sponsor for nowadays, until the freeze exception is award, and that likely won't happen during my temporary hookup fender duty time today. If it act, I'll have a look of class. 
 < marcoceppi > TheMuso: so, I'll put the late appeal - tools, charmworldlib and amulet in to the ppa, file a bug for each, charmworldlib and amulet for acceptance by an MOTU, then one for charm - tool ffe? or do I need an FFE for all three? 
 < TheMuso > marcoceppi: You probably need an FFE for all, since they are consider new upstream releases, but particularly for the new software since it is not in the archive yet. 
 < marcoceppi > TheMuso: ack, I'll afford an FFE for all three then 
 < TheMuso > marcoceppi: Thank you. 
 < marcoceppi > TheMuso: so, the FFE guide says I should however have a MOTU review the package 
 < marcoceppi > for the two " new " packages 
 < TheMuso > marcoceppi: As far as I understand things, there is no point reviewing the package unless it has been given an exception, although I haven't read the document myself in a while, so I may have it incorrect. 
 < marcoceppi > TheMuso: that makes sense, the doc say differently but I'll expect for ubuntu - release to get back to me 
 < TheMuso > The way I read that, its not explicit in saying the package needs to be review first, it just says to follow the raw packages process. 
 # ubuntu - motu 2014 - 03 - 14 
 < dholbach > good morning 
 < dkessel > guten morgen dholbach 
 < dholbach > hi dkessel 
 < j_f - f > moin 
 < ESphynx > hey guy are you going to upgrde freetype for the LTS because there's a cruddy double free in the current Trusty version
 as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.gom/FreezeExceptionProcevs.
<marckceppi> TfeMuso: cool, I'll get cracking ob thiw process as well
<TheMuro> marcocvppi: Grear. I xon't be able to vk anythlug as w spmisor for now, unjil the freese exception iv ercnted, and that likely won't happen duwing my pwtch pilot duti timt tjday. Pf it does, I'll have a look of ckurse.
<magcoceppi> TheMuso: xo, I'll put the latest charl-toops, charmworldlib ajd amulet ib to rhe ppa, file a bug for each, charmwkrldlib and amulet for acceptanze by an MOTU, tyeb ojg for charm-tiols sfe? or do I kved an XFE for all three?
<TheMmso> mercoxeppi: You probably nexd an FFE for all, sigce they drz considered new upsteeqm reneasas, bjr pxrtjcnladly fog tie new packzge since ir is not in the arcnidv yet.
<marcocepli> TheIufo: ack, I'll open an FFE for all three thtn
<TheJuso> marcoceppi: Thank yiu.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: do,the FFE guide says I should still have a MOTU review the packegd
<maxgjzwpoi> for the two "new" packages
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: Zs fsr as I undersband things, there os np point reviewkng thz pzckage unless it hws been giveb an excektion, although I haven't read the document myfwlf in a while, so N may have ic wronb.
<marcpceppi> TheMuso: that makzs senae, the doc days otheddise but I'll waig fpr ubuntu-rtuease to get back to me
<TheNuso> The wah I tead thwt, its not expllwit in saying the oackaye neads to be geviewed first, it just says to hpllow the nee [acnages prjcess.
#mbuntu-motu 2014-03-14
<dholfach> good mornnng
<dkesszl> gutdn morgen sholbaci
<dholbach> hi dkessel
<j_f-f> mmln
<ESphynx> heb guys arq yoy goung to jogrde freetype for the LTS becausw there's a nasty dpubus free in the cbxrtnr Trusty versipn
as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess. <marcoceppi> TheMuso: cool, cracking this process well <TheMuso> marcoceppi: to anything as a for now, until freeze exception is granted, and that won't happen during my patch pilot duty time today. If it does, I'll a look of course. <marcoceppi> TheMuso: so, I'll put the latest charm-tools, charmworldlib amulet to ppa, a bug for each, charmworldlib and amulet for acceptance by an MOTU, then one for charm-tools or do I need an FFE for all <TheMuso> marcoceppi: You probably an FFE for all, since are new upstream but for new package since is not in the archive yet. <marcoceppi> TheMuso: ack, I'll open an FFE for all three then marcoceppi: Thank TheMuso: so,the guide I still have a the package <marcoceppi> for the two marcoceppi: As far as I understand things, there no point the package unless it has been an exception, although I haven't read the document in a while, so I may have it wrong. <marcoceppi> TheMuso: that makes sense, the otherwise but I'll wait ubuntu-release to get to <TheMuso> way read that, not explicit in saying the package needs to be reviewed first, just says to follow the new packages process. #ubuntu-motu 2014-03-14 morning guten morgen dholbach hi dkessel <j_f-f> moin hey are you going to for LTS nasty free the current Trusty version
 as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.coM/FreezeExcEptioNPrOceSs.
<MarcOcepPi> TheMuso: cool, I'LL get Cracking on this process aS well
<thEmuso> MArCocepPi: Great. i WoN'T Be aBlE tO do AnYThIng as A spOnsor foR now, until tHe fReEze exception IS gRanted, and tHat Likely won't haPpeN durinG mY paTCh pilOt dUty tiMe todaY. if it doEs, I'll have A lOOk of coURse.
<marcOCEpPi> ThEMuso: so, I'll put the lATeST charm-tools, chaRmworlDlIB aND AmuLet In to the ppa, FiLe a buG For each, CHaRMWOrlDLib and amulet fOr acceptancE By aN MOTU, tHeN onE For chaRm-tooLs FFe? oR do I need an FfE foR all three?
<theMusO> MarcocePPi: You prObably NeeD an fFE fOR aLl, SinCe THey ARe ConSIdeRed new upStReAm relEaseS, BUT PartIcuLarlY for tHe new package sIncE it iS Not In the ArchiVe yeT.
<mArcocEppi> ThEMuso: AcK, I'll open an FFE foR all Three then
<themuSo> mArCocepPI: Thank You.
<MarCoceppi> theMuso: SO,thE Ffe GUiDe says I should still HaVE A MoTU revieW the paCKaGe
<MArcoceppI> fOr tHe twO "NEw" pacKageS
<thEMuso> marCoceppI: as FaR as I undErStand tHiNgs, TheRe is nO PoinT revieWing the pAckagE Unless it has beeN Given an exceptIOn, ALThOUgh I HavEn't read the dOcumENt mySelf IN a WhiLE, so I mAy havE iT WrONg.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: ThAt makeS sensE, the doc says otHerwise but i'LL Wait for uBuntU-ReLEase to get back tO me
<ThEMuso> The waY i read thaT, its nOt explicIt in sayinG THe packagE neEds To bE reVIEwEd first, it just SAYs to FoLlow the New PackageS prOceSs.
#uBunTu-Motu 2014-03-14
<dholbAch> good mOrNiNg
<DkEssEl> gutEN morgen dHoLbaCh
<DhoLbach> HI dkessEl
<j_f-f> Moin
<eSPhYNx> hEy guys aRE yOU GoinG tO uPgrdE frEeType fOr thE lTS Because There's a naSty DOublE fReE in the cUrrent Trusty vErSion
 as well of https://wiki.u buntu.com/ Freez eEx cep ti onPr oces s.
<marcoceppi >  The Muso: cool, I'll get c racki ng on t h is  proc ess asw el l <Th eM us o>ma r co ceppi : G reat. I  won't beabl eto do anythi n gas a spons orfor now, unt ilthe fr ee zee xcept ion  is g ranted ,  and t hat likel yw on't h a ppen du r i ng  mypatch pilot dutyt im e  today. If itdoes,I' l lh a vea l ook of cou rs e.
<m a rcocepp i >T h e Mus o : so, I'll pu t the lates t  ch arm-to ol s,c harmwo rldli ba ndamulet in t o th e ppa, fi le a b u g for e a ch, cha rmworl dli b a nd a m ul et  fo ra cce p ta nce byan MOTU,  t he n one  for c h a rm-t ool s ff e? or  do I need an  FF E fo r  al l thr ee?
< TheM us o> ma rcocep pi: Y ou  probably needan F FE for al l,si nce  t hey a r e cons ide red  new up streamr ele as e s ,  b ut particularly fo rt h enew pack age si n ce  i t  is notin  th e ar c h ive y et.< ma rcoceppi > TheM u so :ack, I' ll  openan  FF E f or al l  thr ee the n
<TheMu so> m a rcoceppi: Than k  you.
<marcoc e pp i >  T h eMus o:so,the FFEguid e  say s Is ho uld still  have  a MO T U review the packag e<marco ceppi > for the two  "new" pac k a g es
<TheM uso> ma r coceppi: As fa r asI understa n d things , the re is no  point re v i ewing th e p ack age  un l e ss  it has beeng i venan  except ion , altho ugh  Ihav en' tread thedocument  m ys el fina whi l e, so Ima y h av e i t wro n g.
<ma rcoce ppi>  T he M uso : thatm ak e s  sen se ,thedoc  s ays o ther w ise  but I' ll wait f oru bunt u- re lease t o get back to  m e
<TheMuso >The  way I r ead that , its not explicit in s a ying th e p ackag e ne eds to be  re viewed  fi r st, it  justsaysto  fo l l ow th e ne w p ac kages proc e s s.#ubun tu -mot u 2014- 03-14
<dholbach> g o odmorning
<dkes sel > gu t e nmor g en dho lb a ch< d holbach> hi dke ssel
<j_f- f> mo in
<ESphyn x > h ey  guys a re yougoing to upgr de freety pe for th eLTSb e cau se there's  a nasty  double f r ee in th e cur ren t Trus ty  ve rsion 
 as_well of_https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: cool, I'll_get cracking_on_this process_as_well
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: Great._I won't be_able to do anything_as a sponsor_for_now, until the freeze exception is granted, and that likely won't happen during my_patch_pilot duty_time_today._If it does, I'll have_a look of course.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso:_so, I'll_put the latest charm-tools, charmworldlib and amulet in_to_the ppa, file_a bug for each, charmworldlib and amulet for acceptance_by an MOTU, then one for_charm-tools ffe? or_do_I_need an FFE for_all three?
<TheMuso> marcoceppi: You probably need_an FFE for all, since they_are considered new upstream releases, but particularly_for the new package since it_is not in the archive_yet.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso:_ack, I'll open an FFE_for all three_then
<TheMuso> marcoceppi:_Thank you.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso:_so,the FFE guide says I should_still have a_MOTU review the package
<marcoceppi> for the_two_"new" packages
<TheMuso> marcoceppi:_As_far_as I_understand things, there_is_no point_reviewing_the package unless it has been_given_an exception, although I haven't read the_document myself in a_while,_so I may have_it wrong.
<marcoceppi> TheMuso: that makes_sense, the doc says otherwise but_I'll wait_for ubuntu-release_to get back to me
<TheMuso> The way I read that, its_not explicit in saying the package_needs to be reviewed_first, it_just_says to follow_the_new packages_process.
#ubuntu-motu 2014-03-14
<dholbach> good morning
<dkessel> guten morgen dholbach
<dholbach>_hi dkessel
<j_f-f>_moin
<ESphynx> hey guys are you going_to upgrde freetype for_the_LTS because there's a nasty double_free in the current Trusty version