u, and many KDE users have one or both of those installed.
<persia> If the "binary" is a wrapper script of any sort, arranging for elevated permissions in the wrapper script allows one to check what is available on the local system, providing some flexibility.
<hellboy195> persia: ah I see you :) do you remember fail2ban. About the SRU to dapper!?
<Laney> persia: Yeah, actually it's ettercap-gtk, so I guess there wouldn't be a problem with gksu in that case.
<persia> Laney: No, not for ettercap-gtk :)
<Laney> Excellent
<persia> hellboy195: Yes.  I thought Dapper support ended in June 2011, so we didn't need it because it next was a problem in February 2012, but I'm unsure if the patch allows one to read old log files, in which case many Dapper users might want it to recover their two-week old logs.
<Laney> DktrKranz2: Can you review the patch again in that case? ;) re: the recommends: gksu - it already does!
<hellboy195> persia: yeah. that's the problem. Do you think it's a big problem for people to delete the old log files? Or we have to ask the patch submitter if it's working also with the old log files
<DktrKranz2> Laney: great! Now I'm unable to do it (Windows has some troubles with apt-get...), I'll check when I'll back home. Thanks :)
<persia> hellboy195: Better to test locally: the bug submitter already deleted the old log files.  I'm not in favour of a solution that requires deletion of user data, but I suspect most users have already found some workaround at this point.
<persia> DktrKranz2: Even with cygwin?  While it may be hard to test, or compile, or anything, at least apt-get ought work.
<hellboy195> persia: so is it still worth it?
<hellboy195> DktrKranz2: streamtuner?
<DktrKranz2> persia: since it requires X to work, and no time to setup cygwin at
u, and many KDE users have one or both of those installed. 
 < persia > If the " binary " is a wrapper handwriting of any kind, dress for elevated permissions in the wrapping script allows one to discipline what is available on the local organization, providing some tractability. 
 < hellboy195 > persia: ah I examine you :) do you remember fail2ban. About the SRU to dapper! ? 
 < Laney > persia: Yeah, actually it's ettercap - gtk, indeed I guess there wouldn't be a problem with gksu in that sheath. 
 < persia > Laney: No, not for ettercap - gtk :) 
 < Laney > Excellent 
 < persia > hellboy195: Yes.   I intend Dapper support ended in June 2011, so we didn't need it because it next was a problem in February 2012, but I'm diffident if the patch allows one to read previous log files, in which case many Dapper user might want it to recover their two - week old logs. 
 < Laney > DktrKranz2: Can you review the bandage again in that case? ;) re: the recommends: gksu - it already does! 
 < hellboy195 > persia: yeah. that's the problem. Do you think it's a big problem for people to delete the old log files? Or we have to ask the patch submitter if it's working also with the erstwhile log files 
 < DktrKranz2 > Laney: big! Now I'm unable to do it (Windows have some troubles with apt - get ...), I'll check when I'll back home. Thanks :) 
 < persia > hellboy195: well to test locally: the bug submitter already deleted the old log files.   I'm not in favor of a solution that requires deletion of user data, but I suspect most users have already find some workaround at this point. 
 < persia > DktrKranz2: Even with cygwin?   While it may be hard to test, or compile, or anything, at least apt - get ought work. 
 < hellboy195 > persia: therefore is it still worth it? 
 < hellboy195 > DktrKranz2: streamtuner? 
 < DktrKranz2 > persia: since it requires X to ferment, and no time to setup cygwin at
u, ajd many KDE users have oke or both of those insvalled.
<psrsia> If the "binary" is a wrapper scrmpt if ant sort, arranging for euevated pvrmissionw in rhe wrappec script allowa one vo check what ix availabla on the local shscem, providing some flexibility.
<hellbor195> persis: wh I see you :) qo ypt rejvmner fail2ban. About the SRU to dapler!?
<Lanej> persia: Yeah, actially it's ettercap-gtk, so I gueds there wouldn't bf a problem witr gksu in thag case.
<perspc> Laney: No, hot for ettercap-gtk :)
<Laney> Exceluent
<pzrsia> hellbiy195: Yed.  I thought Dappvr support ended in Jgne 2011, so we didn't need it bexause it next was a pcoblem in February 2012, fut I'm unvuxe if the patch alloww ine tm redd oue lug rikea, in wjici case many Dapper usees might want it to rqbpver their tso-week ojd logs.
<Laney> DktrKranz2: Can you review tve latch again in that casw? ;) re: the recommends: hksu - it wlready does!
<hellboy195> persia: yeah. that's the problem. Do ykj tklkk ig'w w big problem for people to delete the old lod folvs? Or we have to csk the patch sunmltygr if it's workkng also sith the old log flles
<DkttKranz2> Laney: grtat! Npw I'm unable to do it (Windoqs has some nrouvles with apt-get...), I'pl check whzn I'll back home. Thanks :)
<persia> heluboy195: Better to hest locamuy: the bug submigteg alseady deleted the old log siles.  I'm not in favuur pf a sjlution thwt requires deletion of kser bata, tut I suspfct most users have already fouiv some workarputd dt this 'oint.
<pcrsia> DktrKranz2: Even with cygcin?  Whije it may be hagd to tesv, or compile, or anything, dj least apt-gev ought wjrk.
<hwllbiy195> perskx: so is it stikl worth pt?
<kellboy195> DjtrKranz2: streamtuncr?
<DkttKdanz2> persia: sinet iu eequires X to eory, agd np ehme to setup cygdin st
u, and many KDE users have one of installed. <persia> the "binary" is sort, for elevated permissions the wrapper script one to check what is available the local system, providing some flexibility. <hellboy195> persia: ah I see you :) you remember fail2ban. About the SRU to dapper!? <Laney> persia: Yeah, actually it's so guess wouldn't a problem with gksu in that case. <persia> Laney: No, not for ettercap-gtk :) <Laney> Excellent hellboy195: Yes. I thought Dapper support ended in 2011, so we didn't it because it next was problem February 2012, I'm if patch allows one read old log files, in which case many Dapper users might want it to recover their two-week logs. <Laney> you review patch in case? ;) re: gksu - it already does! <hellboy195> the problem. Do you think it's a big for people delete the old log files? Or have to ask the patch submitter if it's also with the old log files <DktrKranz2> Laney: great! Now I'm unable to do it some troubles with apt-get...), check when I'll home. :) hellboy195: to test the bug submitter already deleted the old log files. I'm not favour of a solution that requires deletion of user data, suspect users have already some workaround at this <persia> Even with cygwin? While be to or at apt-get ought work. <hellboy195> so is it still worth <hellboy195> DktrKranz2: streamtuner? <DktrKranz2> to work, and no time to setup cygwin
u, and many KDE users have one or Both of thosE instAllEd.
<pErSia> IF the "Binary" is a wrappER scrIpt of any sort, arranging fOr eleVaTEd peRMiSsionS in the wRApPER scRiPt AllOwS OnE to chEck What is aVailable on The LoCal system, proVIdIng some fleXibIlity.
<hellboy195> PerSia: ah I SeE yoU :) Do you RemEmber Fail2baN. about tHe SRU to daPpER!?
<Laney> PErsia: YeAH, AcTualLy it's ettercap-gtk, sO i gUEss there wouldn'T be a prObLEm WITh gKsu In that case.
<PeRsia> LANey: No, noT FoR ETTerCAp-gtk :)
<Laney> ExcEllent
<persiA> HelLboy195: YeS.  I ThoUGht DapPer suPpORt eNded in June 2011, sO we dIdn't need iT becauSE it next WAs a probLem in FEbrUarY 2012, but i'M uNsUre If THe pATcH alLOws One to reaD oLd Log fiLes, iN WHICh caSe mAny DApper Users might wanT it To reCOveR theiR two-wEek oLd Logs.
<LAney> DkTrKraNz2: can you review the PatcH again in tHat CaSe? ;) rE: tHe recOMmends: GksU - it Already Does!
<helLBoy195> PeRSIA: yEah. that's the problem. do YOU tHink it's a Big proBLeM fOR people tO dEleTe thE OLd log FileS? or We have to Ask the PAtCh SubmittEr If it's wOrKinG alSo witH The oLd log fIles
<Dktrkranz2> lAney: great! Now I'm UNable to do it (WiNDoWS HaS Some TroUbles with apT-get...), i'Ll chEck wHEn i'll BAck hoMe. ThaNkS :)
<PeRSia> hellboy195: Better to tEsT localLy: the Bug submitter aLready deleTED The old loG filES.  I'M Not in favour of a SolutIon that reqUIres deleTion oF user datA, but I suspECT most useRs hAve AlrEadY FOuNd some workaroUND at tHiS point.
<pErsIa> DktrKRanZ2: EvEn wIth CyGwin?  While It may be hArD tO tEsT, or CompiLE, or anythInG, at LeAst Apt-geT Ought wOrk.
<heLlboY195> pErSIa: sO is it stILl WORth iT?
<hElLboy195> dktRKRanz2: sTreaMTunEr?
<DktrKRanz2> persiA: siNCe it ReQuIres X to Work, and no time To Setup cygwiN aT
u, and many KDE users have  one or bo th of  th ose  i nsta lled .
<persia> Ift he " binary" is a wrapper s cript  o f  any so rt, a rrangin g  f o r  el ev at edpe r mi ssion s i n the w rapper scr ipt  a llows one to ch eck what i s a vailable onthe  local  s yst e m, pr ovi dingsome f l exibil ity.
<hel lb o y195>p ersia:a h  I  see  you :) do you re m em b er fail2ban. A bout t he SR U todap per!?
<Lan ey > per s ia: Yea h ,a c t ual l y it's etterc ap-gtk, soI  gu ess th er e w o uldn't  be a  p r obl em with gks u in  that cas e.
<pe r sia> La n ey: No,  not f orett erca p -g tk  :) 
< L ane y >Exc e lle nt
<pers ia >hellb oy19 5 : Y es. Ithou ght D apper support  en dedi n J une 2 011,so w edidn' t need  it b ec ause it next wa s aproblem i n F eb rua ry  2012 ,  but I 'muns ure ifthe pat c h a ll o w s  o ne to read old log  f i l es , in whi ch cas e  m an y  Dapperus ers  mig h t  want  itt orecovertheirt wo -w eek old  l ogs.
< La ney > D ktrKr a nz2:  Can y ou revie w the patch again in that case? ;) re : th e  rec omm ends: gksu- it alre adyd oe s!< hellb oy195 >p er s ia: yeah. that's th eproble m. Do  you think it 's a big p r o b lem forpeop l et o delete the o ld lo g files? O r  we have  to a sk the p atch subm i t ter if i t's  wo rki nga l so  with the old l og f il es
<Dkt rKr anz2> L ane y:gre at!  N ow I'm un able todo  i t(W ind ows h a s some t ro ubl es  wi th ap t -get.. .), I 'llch ec k  wh en I'll ba c k  hom e.  T hank s : )<pers ia>h ell boy195:  Better t o t e st l oc al ly: the  bug submitte ralready de le ted  the o l d  log fil es.  I'm not in favouro f a sol uti on th at r equires d ele tion o f u s er dat a, but  I su sp ect m ost u s e rs  ha ve  already f o u ndsomewo rkar ound at  this point.
<pers i a>DktrKranz2: E ven  wit h cy gwi n ?Whi le itm a y be hard to te st, or com pi l e,  or anythi n g,at  leastapt-get  ough t  work.<hellboy1 95> persi a:  soi s  it  still wor th it?
< hellboy19 5 > Dkt r Kr anz2:  st reamtu ne r?<Dktr Kranz2 >  pe rsia:  since  i t requ iresXto work,  and no time to setup c ygwinat
u, and_many KDE_users have one or_both of_those_installed.
<persia> If_the_"binary" is a_wrapper script of_any sort, arranging for_elevated permissions in_the_wrapper script allows one to check what is available on the local system, providing_some_flexibility.
<hellboy195> persia:_ah_I_see you :) do you_remember fail2ban. About the SRU_to dapper!?
<Laney>_persia: Yeah, actually it's ettercap-gtk, so I guess_there_wouldn't be a_problem with gksu in that case.
<persia> Laney: No, not_for ettercap-gtk :)
<Laney> Excellent
<persia> hellboy195: Yes._ I thought_Dapper_support_ended in June 2011,_so we didn't need it because_it next was a problem in_February 2012, but I'm unsure if the_patch allows one to read old_log files, in which case_many Dapper_users might want it to_recover their two-week_old logs.
<Laney>_DktrKranz2: Can you_review the patch again in that_case? ;) re:_the recommends: gksu - it already_does!
<hellboy195>_persia: yeah. that's_the_problem._Do you_think it's a_big_problem for_people_to delete the old log files?_Or_we have to ask the patch submitter_if it's working also_with_the old log files
<DktrKranz2>_Laney: great! Now I'm unable_to do it (Windows has some_troubles with_apt-get...), I'll_check when I'll back home. Thanks :)
<persia> hellboy195: Better to test_locally: the bug submitter already deleted_the old log files._ I'm_not_in favour of_a_solution that_requires deletion of user data, but I_suspect most_users have already found some workaround_at this point.
<persia> DktrKranz2:_Even_with cygwin?  While it may_be hard to test, or compile,_or anything, at least apt-get_ought_work.
<hellboy195>_persia: so is it still_worth it?
<hellboy195> DktrKranz2: streamtuner?
<DktrKranz2> persia: since_it requires X_to work, and no time to setup_cygwin_at