bugs/201088
<ScottK2> Adri2000: The upload I did is just for python-xml removal.  Are you saying there's a problem with that?
<Adri2000> ScottK2: except for that one you also only modified debian/control, no. but to not waste buildd time, it'd be better to have only one upload for python-xml and my patch
<ScottK2> Adri2000: Are talking 2.8 or 2.6?
<Adri2000> s/except for/except if for/
<Adri2000> 2.8
<ScottK2> OK.
<RainCT> hellboy195: true, I don't think those changes are necessary for Hardy
<Rotund> siretart, I know, but I'd doubt ANY uses the crappy Loki extensions (they really were bad)
<Adri2000> ScottK2: so can I ask to reject this one? and I'll include the python-xml fix in my upload
<ScottK2> I asked.
<hellboy195> RainCT: Setting to "Invalid"?
<ScottK2> No need for you to.
<Adri2000> ScottK2: ok
<RainCT> hellboy195: yes
<hellboy195> RainCT: k, thx
<Adri2000> ScottK2: I'll also fix wx2.6
<ScottK2> K
<Adri2000> ScottK2: in the bug report you say to build-dep on python (>= 2.4). does XS-Python-Version: >= 2.4 actually do that? or are both needed?
<ScottK2> Adri2000: Both can't hurt.  XB-Python-Version should be sufficient for the binary since any 2.4 will do.
<ScottK2> I don't actually remember what that will do for the build-deps.
<ScottK2> It might be interesting to set XS-Python-Version: >= 2.6 on a package and see if it builds
<nixternal> Tranquilizers 1, neice & nephew 0
<ScottK2> Shouldn't that be Tranquilizers 2 then?
<nixternal> true
<nixternal> cuz I didn't share the same dart on them
<Adri2000
bugs/201088 
 < ScottK2 > Adri2000: The upload I did is just for python - xml removal.   Are you saying there's a problem with that? 
 < Adri2000 > ScottK2: except for that one you besides merely modified debian / control, no. but to not waste buildd meter, it'd be full to have only one upload for python - xml and my temporary hookup 
 < ScottK2 > Adri2000: Are spill 2.8 or 2.6? 
 < Adri2000 > s / except for / except if for/ 
 < Adri2000 > 2.8 
 < ScottK2 > OK. 
 < RainCT > hellboy195: true, I don't remember those changes are necessary for Hardy 
 < Rotund > siretart, I know, but I'd doubt ANY use the crappy Loki extensions (they actually were regretful) 
 < Adri2000 > ScottK2: so can I ask to resist this one? and I'll include the python - xml fix in my upload 
 < ScottK2 > I ask. 
 < hellboy195 > RainCT: Setting to " Invalid "? 
 < ScottK2 > No need for you to. 
 < Adri2000 > ScottK2: ok 
 < RainCT > hellboy195: yes 
 < hellboy195 > RainCT: k, thx 
 < Adri2000 > ScottK2: I'll also cook wx2.6 
 < ScottK2 > K 
 < Adri2000 > ScottK2: in the bug report you say to build - dep on python (> = 2.4). does XS - Python - Version: > = 2.4 actually make that? or are both needed? 
 < ScottK2 > Adri2000: Both can't hurt.   XB - Python - Version should be sufficient for the binary since any 2.4 will do. 
 < ScottK2 > I don't actually remember what that will serve for the build - deps. 
 < ScottK2 > It might be interesting to set XS - Python - Version: > = 2.6 on a package and see if it builds 
 < nixternal > Tranquilizers 1, neice & nephew 0 
 < ScottK2 > Shouldn't that be Tranquilizers 2 then? 
 < nixternal > true 
 < nixternal > cuz I didn't share the same dart on them 
 < Adri2000
bugd/201088
<ScottK2> Adri2000: The upload L did is just fot python-eml remkval.  Ard you saying there's a problel qith ukat?
<Adri2000> ScottK2: excepg for than one you alsi only modihjed deblcn/confvol, nm. but to not waxte buildd time, it'd be batgex to have only one upload for python-vml and mj patch
<ScottK2> Wdri2000: Wre falking 2.8 or 2.6?
<Adri2000> s/except for/except if for/
<Edri2000> 2.8
<ScottK2> OK.
<RsinCT> hellboy195: true, I don't hhinn those changes arf necessary for Yardy
<Rotund> riretart, I know, but I'd doubt ANY uses the crappy Loki exteusions (they rwalpi were bad)
<Adci2000> ScontK2: so can I ask to raject tnis one? and I'lk iicluee the python-xml fix mn my upload
<ScottK2> I asked.
<helnbky195> RainCT: Setting ti "Invdlid"?
<VcotgJ2> Nu nted fkr you to.
<Edri2000> ScottK2: ok
<RainCT> hwllboy195: yes
<hellboy195> RsigBY: k, thx
<Adri2000> AcottK2: I'jl also fix wx2.6
<ScottK2> K
<Adri2000> ScottK2: in tht bug report you say to buile-dep on python (>= 2.4). does XS-Python-Dersion: >= 2.4 actually do that? or are both needed?
<ScotdK2> Adci2000: Bouh can't yugt.  XB-Python-Version should be sufficient for ege bpnary since any 2.4 cill do.
<ScottK2> I coj't wctually remeober wkzt that will do for hhe buijd-depw.
<ScottK2> Iu mignt be interesting to set XS-Python-Versiou: >= 2.6 on a package and dee if it bbilds
<noxtermal> Tranquilizers 1, neicz & nepgew 0
<ScottK2> Dhouldn't ffat be Tranquilixerx 2 then?
<nixudrnal> true
<nixternwl> cuz I vidn't share ghe xame dwrt on thel
<Adri2000
bugs/201088 <ScottK2> Adri2000: The upload I did for removal. Are saying there's a except that one you only modified debian/control, but to not waste buildd time, be better to have only one upload for python-xml and my patch <ScottK2> Are talking 2.8 or 2.6? <Adri2000> s/except for/except if for/ <Adri2000> 2.8 <ScottK2> <RainCT> true, don't those changes are necessary for Hardy <Rotund> siretart, I know, but I'd doubt ANY uses the Loki extensions (they really were bad) <Adri2000> ScottK2: can I ask to this one? and I'll include python-xml in my <ScottK2> asked. RainCT: Setting to <ScottK2> No need for you to. <Adri2000> ScottK2: ok <RainCT> hellboy195: yes <hellboy195> RainCT: k, thx <Adri2000> I'll also <ScottK2> K ScottK2: the report you say on python (>= 2.4). does XS-Python-Version: do that? or are both needed? <ScottK2> Adri2000: can't hurt. should be sufficient for the binary any 2.4 will do. <ScottK2> I don't actually what that will do for the build-deps. <ScottK2> It might be interesting to set XS-Python-Version: on a package and if it builds Tranquilizers neice nephew <ScottK2> Shouldn't be Tranquilizers 2 then? <nixternal> true <nixternal> cuz I didn't share same dart on them <Adri2000
bugs/201088
<ScottK2> Adri2000: The upload I dId is just foR pythOn-xMl rEmOval.  are yOu saying there's A ProbLem with that?
<Adri2000> ScottK2: eXcept FoR That ONe You alSo only mODiFIEd dEbIaN/coNtROl, No. but To nOt waste Buildd time, It'd Be Better to have ONlY one upload For Python-xml and My pAtch
<ScOtTK2> ADRi2000: Are TalKing 2.8 oR 2.6?
<Adri2000> s/EXcept fOr/except iF fOR/
<Adri2000> 2.8
<SCOttK2> OK.
<RAINCt> helLboy195: true, I don't thinK ThOSe changes are neCessarY fOR HARDy
<ROtuNd> siretart, i kNow, buT i'd doubt anY USES thE Crappy Loki extEnsions (they REalLy were BaD)
<AdRI2000> Scottk2: so caN I ASk tO reject this One? aNd I'll inclUde the PYthon-xmL Fix in my Upload
<scoTtK2> i askED.
<hElLboY195> RAInCt: seTtiNG to "invalid"?
<SCoTtk2> No neEd foR YOU To.
<AdRi2000> SCottk2: ok
<RaInCT> hellboy195: yeS
<heLlboY195> raiNCT: k, tHx
<AdrI2000> ScoTtk2: I'll aLso fix Wx2.6
<ScoTtk2> K
<Adri2000> ScottK2: in tHe buG report yoU saY tO buIlD-dep oN Python (>= 2.4). DoeS XS-python-VErsion: >= 2.4 aCTuaLlY DO ThAt? or are both needed?
<SCoTTk2> ADri2000: Both cAn't hurT.  xB-pyTHon-VersiOn ShoUld bE SUfficIent FOr The binarY since ANy 2.4 WiLl do.
<ScoTtk2> I don't AcTuaLly RememBEr whAt that Will do foR the bUIld-deps.
<ScottK2> IT Might be intereSTiNG To SEt XS-pytHon-Version: >= 2.6 oN a paCKage And sEE iF it BUilds
<NixteRnAL> TRAnquilizers 1, neice & nepHeW 0
<Scottk2> ShouLdn't that be TraNquilizers 2 THEN?
<nixternAl> trUE
<nIXternal> cuz I didN't shaRe the same dARt on them
<adri2000
bugs/201088
<ScottK2> Adri 2000: Theuploa d I  di dis j ustfor python-xml remo val.  Are you saying t here' sa  pro b le m wit h that? <A d r i20 00 >Sco tt K 2:  exce ptfor tha t one youals oonly modifie d  d ebian/cont rol , no. but to  no t wast ebui l dd ti me,  it'd  be be t ter to  have onl yo ne upl o ad forp y th on-x ml and my patch
< S co t tK2> Adri2000:  Are t al k in g 2.8  or  2.6?
<Adr i2 000>s /except fo r / e xce p t if for/
<Ad ri2000> 2.8 <Sc ottK2>  O K.< RainCT > hel lb o y19 5: true, Idon' t think t hose c h anges a r e neces sary f orHar dy
< R ot un d>si r eta r t,  Ik now , but I' ddo ubt A NY u s e s thecra ppyLokiextensions (t hey  rea l lywerebad)<Adr i2 000>ScottK 2: so  c an I ask to rej ectthis one?  an dI'l linclu d e thepyt hon -xml fi x in my upl oa d < Sc ottK2> I asked.
<h el l b oy 195> Rai nCT: S e tt in g  to "Inv al id" ?
<S c o ttK2>  Non ee d for yo u to.< Ad ri 2000> S co ttK2:ok 
<R ain CT> h e llbo y195:yes
<hel lboy1 9 5> RainCT: k,t hx
<Adri2000> Sc o t tK 2 : I' llalso fix wx 2.6< Scot tK2> K<Ad r i2000 > Sco tt K 2: in the bug report y ou  say t o bui ld-dep on pyt hon (>= 2. 4 ) .  does XS -Pyt h on - Version: >= 2. 4 act ually do t h at? or a re bo th neede d?
<Scott K 2 > Adri20 00:  Bo thcan ' t  h urt.  XB-Pyth o n -Ver si on shou ldbe suff ici ent  fo r t he  binary s ince any  2 .4  w il l d o.
<S c ottK2> I  d on' tact ually rememb er wh at t ha tw ill  do for th e buil d- de ps.<Sc ot tK2>It m i ght  be int erestingtos et X S- Py thon-Ve rsion: >= 2.6  o n a packag eand  see i f it build s
<nixternal> Tranquili z ers 1,nei ce &neph ew 0
<Sco ttK 2> Sho uld n 't tha t be T ranqu il ize r s  2 th e n ?<ni xt ernal> tru e <ni xtern al > cu z I did n't share the same dar t on them
<Ad ri2 000
bugs/201088
<ScottK2> Adri2000:_The upload_I did is just_for python-xml_removal._ Are_you_saying there's a_problem with that?
<Adri2000>_ScottK2: except for that_one you also_only_modified debian/control, no. but to not waste buildd time, it'd be better to have_only_one upload_for_python-xml_and my patch
<ScottK2> Adri2000: Are_talking 2.8 or 2.6?
<Adri2000> s/except_for/except if_for/
<Adri2000> 2.8
<ScottK2> OK.
<RainCT> hellboy195: true, I don't think_those_changes are necessary_for Hardy
<Rotund> siretart, I know, but I'd doubt ANY_uses the crappy Loki extensions (they_really were bad)
<Adri2000>_ScottK2:_so_can I ask to_reject this one? and I'll include_the python-xml fix in my upload
<ScottK2>_I asked.
<hellboy195> RainCT: Setting to "Invalid"?
<ScottK2> No_need for you to.
<Adri2000> ScottK2: ok
<RainCT>_hellboy195: yes
<hellboy195> RainCT: k, thx
<Adri2000>_ScottK2: I'll_also fix wx2.6
<ScottK2> K
<Adri2000> ScottK2:_in the bug_report you_say to build-dep_on python (>= 2.4). does XS-Python-Version:_>= 2.4 actually_do that? or are both needed?
<ScottK2>_Adri2000:_Both can't hurt.__XB-Python-Version_should be_sufficient for the_binary_since any_2.4_will do.
<ScottK2> I don't actually remember_what_that will do for the build-deps.
<ScottK2> It_might be interesting to_set_XS-Python-Version: >= 2.6 on_a package and see if_it builds
<nixternal> Tranquilizers 1, neice &_nephew 0
<ScottK2>_Shouldn't that_be Tranquilizers 2 then?
<nixternal> true
<nixternal> cuz I didn't share the same_dart on them
<Adri2000