nigelb> yup
<Laney> I thought there was an SRU for that
<nigelb> I was working on the SRU, but the fix it not in Lucid yet
<Laney> yes it is
 * nigelb checks
<nigelb> no it isn't
<Laney> it was fixed in 0.196, which we have
<nigelb> lucid has 1.0.20, the fix is in 1.0.22
<james_w> persia: I'm about to expire from u-u-s, do I need to care under the new structure? and if so, could you please renew me? thanks.
<nigelb> it was fixed it pbuilder? I thougt the trouble was debootstrap
<nigelb> Laney: ah :)
<Laney> james_w: filed #540250
<james_w> thank you sir
<dyfet> I have an interesting problem with unmet dependencies in lucid
<dyfet> this relates to migrating from libsoup2.2 (karmic) to libsoup2.4
<dyfet> And I was looking for some help on how to resolve this kind of problem
<jayvee> okay, I'm officially confused
<jayvee> am I right in guessing that 'debclean' unapplies all patches?
<jayvee> well, this.diff.gz modifications fixes a bug in the python setup.py app that causes it to download all this crap whenever you run 'debclean'
<azeem_> is that a command?
<jayvee> now, I've been told to put this into a debian/patches format
<jayvee> debclean is a command, yes
<jayvee> I've been told to put this into a debian/patches format, but how can that work when the tree is cleaned, and it causes the bug to trigger?
<azeem_> what is "this"?
<jayvee> the package I'm working on â let me find the bug number
<azeem_> also, I never heard of debclean before and never uesd it
<jayvee> LP #529350
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 529350 in tahoe-lafs "please upgrade Tah
nigelb > yup 
 < Laney > I thought there was an SRU for that 
 < nigelb > I was working on the SRU, but the fix it not in Lucid so far 
 < Laney > yes it is 
  * nigelb discipline 
 < nigelb > no it isn't 
 < Laney > it was fixed in 0.196, which we have 
 < nigelb > lucid has 1.0.20, the fix is in 1.0.22 
 < james_w > persia: I'm about to die from u - u - mho, do I want to care under the fresh structure? and if so, could you please reincarnate me? thanks. 
 < nigelb > it was fixed it pbuilder? I thougt the trouble was debootstrap 
 < nigelb > Laney: ah :) 
 < Laney > james_w: file # 540250 
 < james_w > thank you sir 
 < dyfet > I have an interesting problem with unmet dependencies in lucid 
 < dyfet > this relates to migrating from libsoup2.2 (karmic) to libsoup2.4 
 < dyfet > And I was looking for some aid on how to resolve this kind of problem 
 < jayvee > okay, I'm officially jumble 
 < jayvee > am I right in guessing that' debclean' unapplies all patches? 
 < jayvee > well, this.diff.gz modifications repair a bug in the python setup.py app that causes it to download all this crap whenever you run' debclean' 
 < azeem _ > is that a command? 
 < jayvee > nowadays, I've been told to put this into a debian / patches format 
 < jayvee > debclean is a command, yes 
 < jayvee > I've been told to put this into a debian / patches format, but how can that work when the tree is cleaned, and it causes the bug to trigger? 
 < azeem _ > what is " this "? 
 < jayvee > the package I'm working on â let me find the bug act 
 < azeem _ > also, I never heard of debclean ahead and never uesd it 
 < jayvee > LP # 529350 
 < ubottu > Launchpad hemipterous insect 529350 in tahoe - lafs " please upgrade Tah
nigflb> yup
<Laney> I thought tmere was an SRU yir thav
<nigelb> I was wurking on the SRU, but the fie it not un Lucid yet
<Laney> yes kt is
 * nihelb chexks
<nmgelb> no it isn't
<Laney> it was fjwed iu 0.196, which we have
<kigelb> lucig has 1.0.20, the fix ir nn 1.0.22
<james_w> persia: I'm about to expire srom u-u-x, fo I need to cwre lnqer fhe new structure? and if so, could gou pleese renew me? thsnks.
<nigelb> it was fixed it pbullder? I thougt the trouble waw defiotstrap
<nigeub> Laney: ah :)
<Laney> jamea_w: filed #540250
<james_w> thank you sir
<dywet> I have an ibtwredjing problem with unmet dependencies hn lucic
<dyfet> this rekatxs ti migrating from libsmup2.2 (karmic) to libsjup2.4
<dyfet> Dnb I was looking for simw helk on vow gi rdsomvx tgis kijd kf problem
<nayvee> okay, I'm officially confisqe
<jayvee> am I dight yn guessing that 'debclean' unapplies all pdtcges?
<jayvee> well, this.diff.tz modifications fixed a bug ig the python setup.py app that causes it to downlodd alm thnw crao wjenever you run 'debclean'
<azeem_> is that a commags?
<jsynee> now, I've been bold to put this imtl s debian/patcher formcf
<jzyvee> debclean is w commagd, yew
<jayvee> I'de bren told to put this into a debian/patchvs firmat, but how can chat work whzn the tree is cleaned, and it causzs the bug to trihger?
<azeem_> dhat is "this"?
<jayvde> nhe [ackage I'm working on â let me find vhe bbg numbef
<azegm_> also, I never hfard of debclean before wnd ngver uasd it
<jayvfe> LP #529350
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 529350 in vehoe-lafs "pleaxe upcrade Tak
nigelb> yup <Laney> I thought there was for <nigelb> I working on the not Lucid yet <Laney> it is * checks <nigelb> no it isn't <Laney> was fixed in 0.196, which we have <nigelb> lucid has 1.0.20, the fix in 1.0.22 <james_w> persia: I'm about to expire from u-u-s, do I need care the structure? if so, could you please renew me? thanks. <nigelb> it was fixed it pbuilder? I thougt trouble was debootstrap <nigelb> Laney: ah :) <Laney> filed #540250 <james_w> thank sir <dyfet> I have an problem unmet dependencies lucid this to migrating from (karmic) to libsoup2.4 <dyfet> And I was looking for some help on how to resolve this kind problem <jayvee> officially confused am right guessing that 'debclean' patches? <jayvee> well, this.diff.gz modifications fixes the python setup.py app that causes it to all this whenever you run 'debclean' <azeem_> is a command? <jayvee> now, I've been told to this into a debian/patches format <jayvee> debclean is a command, yes <jayvee> I've been told this into a debian/patches but how can work the is and it the bug to trigger? <azeem_> what is "this"? <jayvee> the package working on â let me find the bug number <azeem_> never of debclean before never uesd it <jayvee> #529350 Launchpad bug 529350 in upgrade
nigelb> yup
<Laney> I thought theRe was an SRU For thAt
<nIgeLb> i was WorkIng on the SRU, but THe fiX it not in Lucid yet
<Laney> yEs it iS
 * nIGelb CHeCks
<niGelb> no iT IsN'T
<lanEy> It Was FiXEd In 0.196, whiCh wE have
<niGelb> lucid hAs 1.0.20, tHe Fix is in 1.0.22
<james_W> PeRsia: I'm abouT to Expire from u-u-S, do i need tO cAre UNder tHe nEw strUcture? ANd if so, Could you pLeASe reneW Me? thankS.
<NIgElb> iT was fixed it pbuildER? I THougt the troublE was deBoOTsTRAp
<nIgeLb> Laney: ah :)
<LAnEy> jamES_w: filed #540250
<JAmES_W> ThaNK you sir
<dyfet> I Have an interEStiNg probLeM wiTH unmet DepenDeNCieS in lucid
<dyfEt> thIs relates To migrATing froM Libsoup2.2 (Karmic) To lIbsOup2.4
<dYFeT> ANd I WaS LooKInG foR SomE help on hOw To ResolVe thIS KINd of ProBlem
<JayveE> okay, I'm officiAllY conFUseD
<jayvEe> am I RighT iN guesSing thAt 'debClEan' unapplies all PatcHes?
<jayvee> WelL, tHis.DiFf.gz mODificaTioNs fIxes a buG in the pYThoN sETUP.pY app that causes it to DoWNLoAd all thiS crap wHEnEvER you run 'dEbCleAn'
<azEEM_> is thAt a cOMmAnd?
<jayveE> now, I'vE BeEn Told to pUt This inTo A deBiaN/patcHEs foRmat
<jaYvee> debcLean iS A command, yes
<jayVEe> I've been told TO pUT ThIS intO a dEbian/patcheS forMAt, buT how CAn ThaT Work wHen thE tREe IS cleaned, and it causes ThE bug to TriggEr?
<azeem_> what is "This"?
<jayvee> THE Package I'M worKInG On â let me find thE bug nUmber
<azeem_> ALso, I neveR hearD of debclEan before AND never ueSd iT
<jaYveE> LP #529350
<UBOtTu> Launchpad buG 529350 IN tahOe-Lafs "pleAse Upgrade tah
nigelb> yup
<Laney> I thou ght therewas a n S RUfo r th at
< nigelb> I wasw orki ng on the SRU, but the  fixit noti nLucid  yet
<L a ne y >  ye sit  is 
*  n igelb  ch ecks
<n igelb> noitis n't
<Laney>i twas fixedin0.196, which  we  have<n ige l b> lu cid  has1.0.20 ,  the f ix is in1. 0 .22
<j a mes_w>p e rs ia:I'm about to expi r ef rom u-u-s, doI need  t o  c a r e u nde r the newst ructu r e? andi fs o ,  co u ld you please  renew me?t han ks.
<n ig elb >  it wa s fix ed itpbuilder? I  tho ugt the t rouble was deb o otstrap 
<nige lb>  La ney: ah  : )
< La n ey> ja mes _ w:filed #5 40 25 0
<ja mes_ w > t hank  yo u si r
<dy fet> I have a n i nter e sti ng pr oblem  wit hunmet  depen denci es  in lucid
<dyfe t> t his relat esto  mi gr ating from l ibs oup 2.2 (ka rmic) t o  li bs o u p 2. 4
<dyfet> And I wa sl o ok ing forsome h e lp  o n  how tore sol ve t h i s kin d of pr oblem
<j ayvee> ok ay , I'm o ff iciall ycon fus ed
<j a yvee > am I  right i n gue s sing that 'deb c lean' unappli e sa l lp atch es? 
<jayvee> w ell, this .dif f .g z m o dific ation sf ix e s a bug in the pyth on  setup .py a pp that cause s it to do w n l oad allthis cr a p whenever you  run'debclean' <azeem_>  is t hat a co mmand?
<j a y vee> now , I 've  be ent o ld  to put thisi n to a  d ebian/p atc hes for mat 
<j ayv ee>  d ebclean i s a comm an d,  y es 
<j ayvee >  I've be en  to ld  to  putt his in to adebi an /p a tch es form a t, b ut h ow  c an t hat  w ork w hent hetree is  cleaned,  an d  itca us es thebug to trigge r? 
<azeem_>wh atis "th i s "?
<jayv ee> the package I'm wor k ing onâ  letme f ind the b ugnumber 
<a z eem_>also,I nev er  he a r d ofd e bc lea nbefore and n eve r ues dit
< jayvee>  LP #529350
<ubott u > L aunchpad bug529 350i n  t aho e -l a fs"p l eas e upgrade Tah
nigelb> yup
<Laney>_I thought_there was an SRU_for that
<nigelb>_I_was working_on_the SRU, but_the fix it_not in Lucid yet
<Laney>_yes it is
_*_nigelb checks
<nigelb> no it isn't
<Laney> it was fixed in 0.196, which we have
<nigelb> lucid_has_1.0.20, the_fix_is_in 1.0.22
<james_w> persia: I'm about_to expire from u-u-s, do_I need_to care under the new structure? and if_so,_could you please_renew me? thanks.
<nigelb> it was fixed it pbuilder? I_thougt the trouble was debootstrap
<nigelb> Laney:_ah :)
<Laney> james_w:_filed_#540250
<james_w>_thank you sir
<dyfet> I_have an interesting problem with unmet_dependencies in lucid
<dyfet> this relates to_migrating from libsoup2.2 (karmic) to libsoup2.4
<dyfet> And_I was looking for some help_on how to resolve this_kind of_problem
<jayvee> okay, I'm officially confused
<jayvee>_am I right_in guessing_that 'debclean' unapplies_all patches?
<jayvee> well, this.diff.gz modifications fixes_a bug in_the python setup.py app that causes_it_to download all_this_crap_whenever you_run 'debclean'
<azeem_> is_that_a command?
<jayvee>_now,_I've been told to put this_into_a debian/patches format
<jayvee> debclean is a command,_yes
<jayvee> I've been told_to_put this into a_debian/patches format, but how can_that work when the tree is_cleaned, and_it causes_the bug to trigger?
<azeem_> what is "this"?
<jayvee> the package I'm working_on â let me find the_bug number
<azeem_> also, I_never heard_of_debclean before and_never_uesd it
<jayvee>_LP #529350
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 529350 in tahoe-lafs_"please upgrade_Tah