suite=all&section=all
<goshawk> RainCT: there is a libconfig0 (the one you are speaking)
<goshawk> RainCT: and a libconfig++6
<goshawk> libconfig0 version 0.1.5
<goshawk> the same version of the launchpad link
<goshawk> and libconfig++6 version 1.3.1
<RainCT> ehm right
<goshawk> ;)
<goshawk> am i learning good? :)
<goshawk> hihi
 * RainCT blames whoever had the idea to give both packages the same name :P
<porthose> goshawk: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
 * goshawk jumps to FreezeExceptionProcess
<RainCT> :)
<goshawk> FreezeExceptionProcess says me to include the package, but should i include the orig.tar.gz, the diff.gz the.dsc, the.changes or all? If i should include all, but launchpad makes me upload only one, can i put them in a tar.gz packagE?
<Laney> goshawk: debdiff is fine
<Laney> or diff.gz for new upstream
<goshawk> it's a new package, so diff.gz
<Laney> completely new package?
<goshawk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342530
<ubottu> Ubuntu bug 342530 in ubuntu "libconfig++6 in debian testing and sid and not in ubuntu jaunty" [Undecided,New]
<goshawk> well it's new for ubuntu
<goshawk> but not for debian
<cjwatson> goshawk: Launchpad may only let you use one attachment at a time, but there's nothing to stop you uploading several attachments in succession
<cjwatson> although for a Debian package I'd say that a debdiff against the Debian package would be perfectly fine, if indeed there is any debdiff
<cjwatson> (I don't know the MOTU policies on this, this is just what I'd want if I were sponsoring it)
<cjwatson> if there's no difference versus Debian I see no reason to bother including the package at all, personally
<goshawk> ok uploading a debdiff too and pointing to
suite = all&section = all 
 < goshawk > RainCT: there is a libconfig0 (the one you are speaking) 
 < goshawk > RainCT: and a libconfig++6 
 < goshawk > libconfig0 version 0.1.5 
 < goshawk > the same version of the launching pad link 
 < goshawk > and libconfig++6 interpretation 1.3.1 
 < RainCT > ehm right 
 < goshawk > ;) 
 < goshawk > am i learning good? :) 
 < goshawk > hihi 
  * RainCT blame whoever have the idea to give both package the same name :P 
 < porthose > goshawk: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess 
  * goshawk jumps to FreezeExceptionProcess 
 < RainCT > :) 
 < goshawk > FreezeExceptionProcess say me to include the package, but should i admit the orig.tar.gz, the diff.gz the.dsc, the.changes or all? If i should include all, but launchpad makes me upload only one, can i place them in a tar.gz packagE? 
 < Laney > goshawk: debdiff is fine 
 < Laney > or diff.gz for new upstream 
 < goshawk > it's a new package, so diff.gz 
 < Laney > wholly new package? 
 < goshawk > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342530 
 < ubottu > Ubuntu bug 342530 in ubuntu " libconfig++6 in debian examination and sid and not in ubuntu jaunty " [ Undecided, New ] 
 < goshawk > well it's new for ubuntu 
 < goshawk > but not for debian 
 < cjwatson > goshawk: Launchpad may only let you practice one attachment at a prison term, but there's nothing to stop you uploading several fastening in succession 
 < cjwatson > although for a Debian package I'd say that a debdiff against the Debian package would be perfectly fine, if indeed there is any debdiff 
 < cjwatson > (I don't know the MOTU policies on this, this is just what I'd want if I were sponsoring it) 
 < cjwatson > if there's no difference versus Debian I see no reason to bother including the software at wholly, personally 
 < goshawk > ok uploading a debdiff too and pointing to
suihe=all&section=all
<goshawk> RxinCT: there is c libcoifig0 (ths one yoj are speaking)
<goshawk> RainCT: abd a oibconfig++6
<goshawk> libcovfig0 verspon 0.1.5
<goshaqk> tie same version of the launchpzf liuk
<joshawk> and libgonfig++6 vershon 1.3.1
<RainCT> ehm rkgkt
<goshawk> ;)
<goshawk> am i learning good? :)
<goshawl> jihi
 * RainCT bjamex whosnev had the idea to give both packzges tht same name :P
<porthpse> goshawk: https://wiki.ubuntk.com/VreezeExceptionProfess
 * goshaqk jtnps to FreezdExceptionKrmcess
<RainCJ> :)
<goshawk> FreezeExceptionProcess says me to incouee hve package, uut shjuld i include the osig.tar.ga, the diff.gz tme.dsc, thw.changes or all? If i vhould include all, but launwh'ad makes me upload oblt one, can i pjr tfem ii a tar.gz parkagE?
<Laney> foshawk: debeiff is fine
<Laney> ot qpgf.gz for new upstrqai
<goshawk> it's a new package, so diff.gz
<Lanty> cojpletely new package?
<gosyawk> https://bugs.launchpwd.net/bugs/342530
<tbottu> Ubuntu bug 342530 in ubuntu "libconfig++6 in debian destiig anb sid xbd not in ubuntu jaunty" [Undecided,New]
<goshawk> welj iu's kew for ubuntu
<gofhawk> but npt fpt debian
<cjwatsun> goskzwi: Launchpad may onpy let iou usw one attwchmrnt at a time, but there's norhing to stoi yoy uploading severap attachmencs in xuccexsion
<cjwatson> although yor a Sebian packwge I'd sag that a debdiff xgapnst the Debian package would fe perfecvly fnne, if ivdeec therq is any dfbdifn
<wjwatson> (I don't knlw thg MOTU policies ln this, this is just what I'd waiv if I were skonvorpng it)
<cjwctson> lf there's no disference versux Debiau I sed no reasoh to bovher includigg the packaga at all, persmnally
<gofhawj> ok uploadkvg a debdiff tpo and popnuing to
suite=all&section=all <goshawk> RainCT: there is a libconfig0 you speaking) <goshawk> and a libconfig++6 the version of the link <goshawk> and version 1.3.1 <RainCT> ehm right <goshawk> <goshawk> am i learning good? :) <goshawk> hihi * RainCT blames whoever had idea to give both packages the same name :P <porthose> goshawk: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess * jumps FreezeExceptionProcess :) FreezeExceptionProcess says me to include the package, but should i include the orig.tar.gz, the diff.gz the.dsc, or all? If i should include all, but makes me upload only can i put them in tar.gz <Laney> goshawk: is <Laney> diff.gz for new <goshawk> it's a new package, so diff.gz <Laney> completely new package? <goshawk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342530 <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 342530 ubuntu "libconfig++6 testing and and in jaunty" [Undecided,New] <goshawk> new for ubuntu <goshawk> but not goshawk: Launchpad may only let you use one at a but there's nothing to stop you several attachments in succession <cjwatson> although for a package I'd say that a debdiff against the Debian package would be perfectly fine, if is any debdiff <cjwatson> don't know the policies this, is what I'd if I were sponsoring it) <cjwatson> if there's no difference versus I see no reason to bother including the package at <goshawk> uploading a debdiff and pointing to
suite=all&section=all
<goshawk> rainCT: therE is a lIbcOnfIg0 (The oNe yoU are speaking)
<goSHawk> rainCT: and a libconfig++6
<gosHawk> lIbCOnfiG0 VeRsion 0.1.5
<Goshawk> THe SAMe vErSiOn oF tHE lAunchPad Link
<gosHawk> and libConFiG++6 version 1.3.1
<Rainct> eHm right
<gosHawK> ;)
<goshawk> am i lEarNing goOd? :)
<GosHAwk> hiHi
 * RAinCT Blames WHoever Had the ideA tO Give boTH packagES ThE samE name :P
<porthose> gosHAwK: Https://wiki.ubuntU.com/FrEeZEEXCEptIonprocess
 * gosHaWk jumPS to FreeZEEXCEPtiONProcess
<RainCt> :)
<goshawk> FreEZeEXceptiOnproCEss sayS me to InCLudE the package, But sHould i incLude thE Orig.tar.GZ, the difF.gz the.Dsc, The.ChanGEs Or All? if I ShoULd IncLUde All, but laUnChPad maKes mE UPLOad oNly One, cAn i puT them in a tar.gz PacKagE?
<lAneY> goshAwk: deBdifF iS fine
<laney> oR diff.Gz For new upstream
<gOshaWk> it's a new PacKaGe, sO dIff.gz
<lAney> coMplEteLy new paCkage?
<goSHawK> hTTPS://bUgs.launchpad.net/bugS/342530
<uBOTtU> Ubuntu bUg 342530 in ubUNtU "lIBconfig++6 iN dEbiAn teSTIng anD sid ANd Not in ubuNtu jauNTy" [unDecided,neW]
<goshaWk> WelL it'S new fOR ubuNtu
<gosHawk> but nOt for DEbian
<cjwatson> gOShawk: LaunchpaD MaY ONlY Let yOu uSe one attachMent AT a tiMe, buT ThEre'S NothiNg to sToP YoU Uploading several attAcHments In sucCession
<cjwatsOn> although FOR A Debian pAckaGE I'D Say that a debdifF agaiNst the DebiAN package Would Be perfecTly fine, if INDeed therE is Any DebDifF
<CJwAtson> (I don't knoW THe MOtU PolicieS on This, thiS is JusT whAt I'D wAnt if I werE sponsorInG iT)
<cJwAtsOn> if tHEre's no diFfEreNcE veRsus DEBian I sEe no rEasoN tO bOTheR includINg THE pacKaGe At alL, peRsOnallY
<gosHAwk> Ok uploaDing a debdIff TOo anD pOiNting to
suite=all&section=all
<gos hawk> Rain CT: t her e i sa li bcon fig0 (the oney ou a re speaking)
<goshawk>  Rain CT :  and alibco nfig++6 <g o s haw k>  l ibc on f ig 0 ver sio n 0.1.5 
<goshawk>  th esame version of  the launc hpa d link
<gosh awk > andli bco n fig++ 6 v ersio n 1.3. 1 
<Rain CT> ehm r ig h t
<gos h awk> ;) < go shaw k> am i learningg oo d ? :)
<goshawk>  hihi * Ra i n CTbla mes whoeve rhad t h e ideat og i v e b o th packages t he same nam e  :P 
<port ho se> goshaw k: ht tp s :// wiki.ubuntu .com /FreezeEx ceptio n Process  * gosh awk ju mps  to  Fre e ze Ex cep ti o nPr o ce ss< Rai nCT> :)<g os hawk>  Fre e z e E xcep tio nPro cesssays me to in clu de t h e p ackag e, bu t sh ou ld iinclud e the  o rig.tar.gz, the  dif f.gz the. dsc ,the .c hange s  or al l?Ifi shoul d inclu d e a ll , b ut  launchpad makes m eu p lo ad onlyone, c a nip ut themin  atar. g z  pack agE? <L aney> go shawk: de bd iff isfi ne
<La ne y>ordiff. g z fo r newupstream 
<gos h awk> it's a ne w  package, sod if f . gz <Lan ey>  completely  new pack age? <g osh a wk> h ttps: // b ug s .launchpad.net/bugs /3 42530<ubot tu> Ubuntu bu g 342530 i n u buntu "l ibco n fi g ++6 in debiantesti ng and sid and notin ub untu jau nty" [Und e c ided,New ]
< gos haw k>w e ll  it's new for u bunt u<goshaw k>but not  fo r d ebi an<c jwatson>goshawk:  L au nc hp admay o n ly let y ou  us eone  atta c hmentat atime ,bu t  th ere's n o th i n g to  s to p yo u u pl oadin g se v era l attac hments in  su c cess io n<cjwats on> althoughfo r a Debian  p ack age I' d say that  a debdiff against theD ebian p ack age w ould  be perfe ctl y fine , i f  indee d ther e isan y d e b diff< c jw ats on > (I don't k now  theMO TU p olicies  on this, this isj ust  what I'd wan t i f Iw e re  sp o ns o rin gi t)< c jwatson> if the re's no di ff e re nce versus Deb ia n I see  no rea son t o  bother  includin g the pac ka ge a t all , personal ly
<gosh awk> ok u p loadi n ga deb dif f tooan d p ointi ng to
suite=all&section=all
<goshawk> RainCT:_there is_a libconfig0 (the one_you are_speaking)
<goshawk>_RainCT: and_a_libconfig++6
<goshawk> libconfig0 version_0.1.5
<goshawk> the same_version of the launchpad_link
<goshawk> and libconfig++6_version_1.3.1
<RainCT> ehm right
<goshawk> ;)
<goshawk> am i learning good? :)
<goshawk> hihi
 * RainCT blames whoever_had_the idea_to_give_both packages the same name_:P
<porthose> goshawk: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
 * goshawk_jumps to_FreezeExceptionProcess
<RainCT> :)
<goshawk> FreezeExceptionProcess says me to include the_package,_but should i_include the orig.tar.gz, the diff.gz the.dsc, the.changes or all?_If i should include all, but_launchpad makes me_upload_only_one, can i put_them in a tar.gz packagE?
<Laney> goshawk:_debdiff is fine
<Laney> or diff.gz for_new upstream
<goshawk> it's a new package, so_diff.gz
<Laney> completely new package?
<goshawk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342530
<ubottu> Ubuntu_bug 342530 in ubuntu "libconfig++6_in debian_testing and sid and not_in ubuntu jaunty"_[Undecided,New]
<goshawk> well_it's new for_ubuntu
<goshawk> but not for debian
<cjwatson> goshawk:_Launchpad may only_let you use one attachment at_a_time, but there's_nothing_to_stop you_uploading several attachments_in_succession
<cjwatson> although_for_a Debian package I'd say that_a_debdiff against the Debian package would be_perfectly fine, if indeed_there_is any debdiff
<cjwatson> (I_don't know the MOTU policies_on this, this is just what_I'd want_if I_were sponsoring it)
<cjwatson> if there's no difference versus Debian I see_no reason to bother including the_package at all, personally
<goshawk>_ok uploading_a_debdiff too and_pointing_to