 amazing.
<jdong> the Debian sid package ships with a defective control
 * jdong regenerates it?
<cody-somerville> What package is that for?
<jdong> cody-somerville: that's your gdesklets package
<jdong> it's the same way in control.in too
 * jdong scratches head
<cody-somerville> wow
<cody-somerville> You're right.
<jdong> would you like to fix that and resubmit the debdiff? :)
<cody-somerville> jdong, I would love to
<jdong> fantastic
<cody-somerville> jdong, oink :)
<jdong> cody-somerville: ok, lemme try this one out :)
<jdong> cody-somerville: while I'm playing with this, would you mind submitting this to Debian?
<cody-somerville> If I can figure out how, sure :)
<jdong> it just gives your e-mail client a workout :)
<jdong> cody-somerville: also, I don't like how the package seems to have two glib build-deps too
<jdong> +               libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.1-2),
<jdong> +               libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.10.0)
<jdong> I am guessing the former should be removed.
<jdong> (is it just me, or is Debian QA really subpar on this package?)
<cody-somerville> should I go with the higher versioned libglib2.0-dev?
<jdong> that's what I would do
<cody-somerville> new debdiff uploaded
<jdong> awesome
<protonchris> jdong: Are you up for looking at another package and potentially sponsoring an upload?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glom/+bug/201385
<ubotu> Launchpad bug 201385 in glom "Hardy: Please update glom to latest version" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
<cody-somerville> jdong, Okay. I filed two bugs in debian (I hope)
<jdong> cody-
amazing. 
 < jdong > the Debian sid package ships with a defective control 
  * jdong reform it? 
 < cody - somerville > What software is that for? 
 < jdong > cody - somerville: that's your gdesklets package 
 < jdong > it's the same direction in control.in besides 
  * jdong scratches head 
 < cody - somerville > wow 
 < cody - somerville > You're correct. 
 < jdong > would you wish to fix that and resubmit the debdiff? :) 
 < cody - somerville > jdong, I would love to 
 < jdong > fantastic 
 < cody - somerville > jdong, oink :) 
 < jdong > cody - somerville: ok, lemme try this one out :) 
 < jdong > cody - somerville: while I'm play with this, would you mind submitting this to Debian? 
 < cody - somerville > If I can visualize out how, certain :) 
 < jdong > it just give your east - chain mail client a workout :) 
 < jdong > cody - somerville: also, I don't wish how the package seems to have two glib build - deps too 
 < jdong > +                libglib2.0 - dev (> = 2.4.1 - 2), 
 < jdong > +                libglib2.0 - dev (> = 2.10.0) 
 < jdong > I am think the former should be removed. 
 < jdong > (is it just me, or is Debian QA really subpar on this package ?) 
 < cody - somerville > should I plump with the higher versioned libglib2.0 - dev? 
 < jdong > that's what I would do 
 < cody - somerville > new debdiff uploaded 
 < jdong > awesome 
 < protonchris > jdong: Are you up for looking at another package and potentially sponsoring an upload?   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glom/+bug/201385 
 < ubotu > Launchpad hemipterous insect 201385 in glom " Hardy: Please update glom to latest version " [ Wishlist, Confirmed ] 
 < cody - somerville > jdong, Okay. I filed two bugs in debian (I hope) 
 < jdong > cody-
 amwzing.
<jdong> the Debian sia package ships with a defecfive congrol
 * jdong regenerates it?
<covy-sonerviole> What package is thxt for?
<jdojg> cody-simertille: that's your gdesklebf padnage
<lding> it's the sake way in wontrol.in too
 * jaoug scratches head
<cody-somerville> wow
<cjdy-sometvllle> You're rigrt.
<jdpgg> wkllb you like to fix that and resugmit tht debdiff? :)
<cody-sometville> jdong, I would love ho
<jdlng> fantastic
<cody-slmerville> jeong, iink :)
<jdong> cudy-somerville: ok, lemme try this one out :)
<jdong> cody-somdrvilke: while I'n plajhng with thms, woujd you mind submittitg this to Debian?
<cody-xomxrviole> If I can figure ont how, sure :)
<jdong> it just givas your e-mail clienr q wornout :)
<jdovt> cudy-aokedville: alao, I don't mike how thw package seems to nadv two glib bujld-depf eoo
<jdong> +               libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.1-2),
<jdotg> +               libglib2.0-dwv (>= 2.10.0)
<jdong> I am guessijg the fowmer should be removed.
<jdong> (is it just me, or is Dabian DA xcwuoy subpar on this package?)
<cody-somerville> should Y gp eith the highev versioned libglin2.0-dfv?
<kqong> that's whxt I wouls do
<cody-somerville> new defdiff uploaded
<tdonb> awesome
<protonchris> jdong: Qre you up fje looking at anothzr package aud potgntialky sponsoring an upload?  htfps://bugs.launfhpad.net/ugjntu/+source/glom/+bue/201385
<ubptg> Launchkxd bug 201385 in glom "Hwrdy: Pleawe u'date glum tp lateft version" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
<cody-solervipla> jdong, Okwy. I filed two bugs in debian (I hope)
<jdong> codi-
amazing. <jdong> the Debian sid package ships defective * jdong it? <cody-somerville> What cody-somerville: your gdesklets package it's the same in control.in too * jdong scratches <cody-somerville> wow <cody-somerville> You're right. <jdong> would you like to fix that and the debdiff? :) <cody-somerville> jdong, I would love to <jdong> fantastic <cody-somerville> jdong, :) cody-somerville: lemme this one out :) <jdong> cody-somerville: while I'm playing with this, would you mind submitting this Debian? <cody-somerville> If I can figure out how, :) <jdong> it just your e-mail client a workout <jdong> also, I like the seems to have glib build-deps too <jdong> + libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.1-2), <jdong> + libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.10.0) <jdong> I am guessing former should <jdong> (is just or Debian QA really this package?) <cody-somerville> should I go versioned libglib2.0-dev? <jdong> that's what I would do new debdiff <jdong> awesome <protonchris> jdong: Are you for looking at another package and potentially sponsoring upload? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glom/+bug/201385 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 201385 in glom "Hardy: Please update glom to latest version" jdong, Okay. I filed bugs in debian hope) cody-
 amazing.
<jdong> the Debian sid pAckage shipS with A deFecTiVe coNtroL
 * jdong regeneraTEs it?
<Cody-somerville> What packAge is ThAT for?
<JDoNg> codY-somervILlE: THat'S yOuR gdEsKLeTs pacKagE
<jdong> iT's the same wAy iN cOntrol.in too
 * jDOnG scratches HeaD
<cody-somerviLle> Wow
<codY-sOmeRVille> you'Re rigHt.
<jdonG> Would yOu like to fIx THat and REsubmit THE dEbdiFf? :)
<cody-somerville> jDOnG, i would love to
<jdOng> fanTaSTiC
<COdy-SomErville> jdoNg, Oink :)
<jDOng> cody-SOmERVIllE: Ok, lemme try thiS one out :)
<jdonG> CodY-somerViLle: WHile I'm PlayiNg WIth This, would yoU minD submittiNg this TO Debian?
<COdy-someRville> if I Can FiguRE oUt How, SuRE :)
<jdONg> It jUSt gIves your E-mAiL clieNt a wORKOUt :)
<jdOng> Cody-SomerVille: also, I don'T liKe hoW The PackaGe seeMs to HaVe two Glib buIld-dePs Too
<jdong> +               libglib2.0-Dev (>= 2.4.1-2),
<jDong> +               libglIb2.0-dEv (>= 2.10.0)
<JdoNg> i am guESsing tHe fOrmEr shoulD be remoVEd.
<jDoNG> (IS iT just me, or is Debian Qa rEALlY subpar oN this pACkAgE?)
<Cody-someRvIllE> shoULD I go wIth tHE hIgher verSioned LIbGlIb2.0-dev?
<jdOnG> that's WhAt I WouLd do
<cODy-soMervilLe> new debDiff uPLoaded
<jdong> aweSOme
<protonchriS> JdONG: ARE you Up fOr looking at AnotHEr paCkagE AnD poTEntiaLly spOnSOrINg an upload?  https://bugs.LaUnchpaD.net/uBuntu/+source/glOm/+bug/201385
<ubotu> lAUNchpad buG 201385 in gLOm "hArdy: Please updaTe gloM to latest vERsion" [WisHlist,confirmeD]
<cody-someRVIlle> jdonG, OkAy. I FilEd tWO BuGs in debian (I hoPE)
<JdonG> cOdy-
 amazing.
<jdong> the Debi an sid pac kageshi pswi th a  def ective control  * j dong regenerates it?
< cody- so m ervi l le > Wha t packa g ei s  th at  f or? 
< j do ng> c ody -somerv ille: that 'syo ur gdesklets pa ckage
<jdo ng>  it's the sa meway in  c ont r ol.in  to o
 *jdongs cratch es head
< co d y-some r ville>w o w<cod y-somerville> You ' re right.
<jdong>  would  y o ul i ketofix that a nd  resu b mit the de b d i ff? :)
<cody-some rville> jdo n g,I woul dlov e  to
<j dong>  f a nta stic
<cody- some rville> j dong,o ink :)< jdong>cody-s ome rvi lle: ok ,lem me try th iso neout :)
< jd on g> co dy-s o m e r vill e:whil e I'm  playing with  th is,w oul d you  mind  sub mi tting  thisto De bi an?
<cody-somer vill e> If I c anfi gur eout h o w, sur e : )
< jdong>it just giv es y o ur  e-mail client a w or k o ut  :)
<jdo ng> co d y- so m erville:  a lso , Id o n't l ikeh ow  the pac kage s e em sto have  t wo gli bbui ld- depst oo
< jdong>  +            libglib2.0- d ev (>= 2.4.1- 2 ), < jd o ng>+             li b glib 2.0- d ev  (> =  2.10 .0)
< jd o ng >  I am guessing thefo rmer s hould  be removed.<jdong> (i s i t just m e, o r  i s  Debian QA rea lly s ubpar on t h is packa ge?)<cody-so merville> s hould Igowit h t heh i gh er versionedl i bgli b2 .0-dev? 
<j dong> t hat 'swha t I  w ould do
< cody-som er vi ll e>  ne w deb d iff uplo ad ed<j don g> aw e some
< proto nchr is >j don g: Arey ou u p fo rlo okin g a tanoth er p a cka ge andpotential lys pons or in g an up load?  https: // bugs.launc hp ad. net/ub u n tu/+sour ce/glom/+bug/201385
<ub o tu> Lau nch pad b ug 2 01385 inglo m "Har dy: Please  updat e glo mtol a testv e rs ion "[Wishlist, C o nfi rmed] 
< cody -somerv ille> jdong, Okay. I f iled two bugs  in  deb i a n(Ih op e )
< jd o ng> c ody-
 amazing.
<jdong>_the Debian_sid package ships with_a defective_control
_* jdong_regenerates_it?
<cody-somerville> What package_is that for?
<jdong>_cody-somerville: that's your gdesklets_package
<jdong> it's the_same_way in control.in too
 * jdong scratches head
<cody-somerville> wow
<cody-somerville> You're right.
<jdong> would you like_to_fix that_and_resubmit_the debdiff? :)
<cody-somerville> jdong, I_would love to
<jdong> fantastic
<cody-somerville> jdong,_oink :)
<jdong>_cody-somerville: ok, lemme try this one out :)
<jdong>_cody-somerville:_while I'm playing_with this, would you mind submitting this to Debian?
<cody-somerville>_If I can figure out how,_sure :)
<jdong> it_just_gives_your e-mail client a_workout :)
<jdong> cody-somerville: also, I don't_like how the package seems to_have two glib build-deps too
<jdong> + _     _    _ _libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.1-2),
<jdong> + _  _ _  _     libglib2.0-dev_(>= 2.10.0)
<jdong> I_am guessing the former should be_removed.
<jdong>_(is it just_me,_or_is Debian_QA really subpar_on_this package?)
<cody-somerville>_should_I go with the higher versioned_libglib2.0-dev?
<jdong>_that's what I would do
<cody-somerville> new debdiff_uploaded
<jdong> awesome
<protonchris> jdong: Are_you_up for looking at_another package and potentially sponsoring_an upload?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glom/+bug/201385
<ubotu> Launchpad bug_201385 in_glom "Hardy:_Please update glom to latest version" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
<cody-somerville> jdong, Okay. I filed_two bugs in debian (I hope)
<jdong>_cody-