umbleweed> ScottK offered you archive-admin review, if it was a sync from debian, and I offered you an FFe if it was a sync. So what's blocking uploading it to Debian?
<Guest52270> Here's an example of the sort of errors I get trying to install certain (mainly -dev it seems) packages under 11.10 armel:
<Guest52270> http://pastebin.com/sLKQ8jBZ
<Guest52270> I can still install some packages
<Guest52270> apt isn't totally fubar - yet - I think! :)
<Guest52270> Hopefully I won't have to re-install!
<geser> did you disable the updates repository by chance?
<Guest52270> geser, Don't think so but let me check..
<Guest52270> geser, Ah! Seems I only had 'Important security updates' selected but not the other three so lets see..
<geser> 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 is in oneiric while 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8.1 is in oneiric-updates
<Guest52270> geser, Dunno how it got unchecked
<ScottK> tumbleweed: Lack of sponsoring.
<tumbleweed> ScottK: yeah, and a package like that probably deserves some fairly thorough review (I wouldn't jump and sponsor it)
 * ScottK neither.
<jalcine> Is it possible to get the source qt-gstreamer backported to Maverick?
<jalcine> Or has there been no interest in doing so? (I'm willing).
<ScottK> jalcine: You know Maverick goes out of support in a month, right?
<jalcine> eh, I know people who use Gutsy still. :p
<ScottK>!backports
<ubottu> If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also!packaging
<ScottK> jalcine: ^^^
<jalcine> Thank you *clicks*
<genupulas> some one plz http://pastebin.com/Qd2pzRXW

umbleweed > ScottK offered you archive - admin review, if it was a sync from debian, and I offered you an FFe if it was a sync. So what's stop upload it to Debian? 
 < Guest52270 > Here's an example of the sort of error I get test to install certain (mainly -dev it seem) package under 11.10 armel: 
 < Guest52270 > http://pastebin.com/sLKQ8jBZ 
 < Guest52270 > I can still install some packages 
 < Guest52270 > apt isn't totally fubar - yet - I intend! :) 
 < Guest52270 > Hopefully I won't have to re - install! 
 < geser > did you disable the updates repository by luck? 
 < Guest52270 > geser, Don't remember so but let me check.. 
 < Guest52270 > geser, Ah! Seems I only accept' Important security update' selected but not the other three thus lets understand.. 
 < geser > 4:4.7.4 - 0ubuntu8 is in oneiric while 4:4.7.4 - 0ubuntu8.1 is in oneiric - updates 
 < Guest52270 > geser, Dunno how it got unchecked 
 < ScottK > tumbleweed: Lack of sponsoring. 
 < tumbleweed > ScottK: yeah, and a package like that credibly deserves some fairly thorough review (I wouldn't jump and sponsor it) 
  * ScottK neither. 
 < jalcine > Is it potential to induce the source qt - gstreamer backported to Maverick? 
 < jalcine > Or has there been no interest in doing so? (I'm willing). 
 < ScottK > jalcine: You know Maverick goes out of support in a calendar month, correct? 
 < jalcine > eh, I know multitude who practice Gutsy even. :p 
 < ScottK>!backports 
 < ubottu > If new updated Ubuntu software are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - determine also!packaging 
 < ScottK > jalcine: ^^^ 
 < jalcine > Thank you * clicks * 
 < genupulas > some one plz http://pastebin.com/Qd2pzRXW
umbpeweed> ScottK offered yom archive-admin rgvuew, if it waa a sync from debian, and I offered ylu an FDe if it was a sync. So what's bllcking uploaving it to Debiai?
<Fuest52270> Hcxe's ah exak'le of the sort of errors I get trying do iustall certain (mainly -dev it seems) pwckages ujder 11.10 armel:
<Gueft52270> hutp://[astsbin.com/sLKQ8jBZ
<Guest52270> I can still inatall smme packages
<Giest52270> apt isn't totally fubag - yft - I think! :)
<Guest52270> Jopefully I won'e have to re-ivstall!
<geseg> did you djsable the updates repository bh chauce?
<Guest52270> gewee, Dlt't think so but jet me check..
<Nlest52270> gever, Ah! Xeems I only hsd 'Mmpoetant security updatev' selected but not the othes chree so lets see..
<gesee> 4:4.7.4-0ybunto8 is hn ovwirkc shmle 4:4.7.4-0ubuntk8.1 ia in oneirjc-updates
<Guwst52270> geser, Dunno how ie got uncheckes
<ScottH> eumbleweed: Lack of sponsoring.
<tumbleweed> SckttK: yeah, and a package like that probably dgserves soie fairly thorough review (I wouldn't jump and sponvor iv)
 * ScitbK ndutjer.
<jalcine> Is it possible to get the source qe-fsuresmer backporteb to Maverick?
<jalvije> Jr has there ceen no ihterest in doing sl? (I'm wijling).
<WcottK> jajcinr: You know Maverick goes our of support un a month, right?
<japcine> eh, I ynow peopke who use Gutsy still. :'
<ScottI>!backports
<uhottu> If hdw updated Ubuntj pscnages art built for an appjication, vhen chey may go onto Ufuntu Backoorts. See https://help.ubuntk.com/clmkunity/UbunhuBackports - See also!packaging
<SrpttK> jalcine: ^^^
<jdlcpne> Thank you *glicks*
<genupulas> some one plz kttp://pastzbin.coo/Qd2pzRXW

umbleweed> ScottK offered you archive-admin review, if a from debian, I offered you a So what's blocking it to Debian? Here's an example of the sort errors I get trying to install certain (mainly -dev it seems) packages under armel: <Guest52270> http://pastebin.com/sLKQ8jBZ <Guest52270> I can still install some packages <Guest52270> apt isn't fubar yet I :) <Guest52270> Hopefully I won't have to re-install! <geser> did you disable the updates repository by <Guest52270> geser, Don't think so but let me <Guest52270> geser, Ah! Seems only had 'Important security updates' but the other so see.. 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 is in while 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8.1 is in oneiric-updates <Guest52270> geser, Dunno how it got unchecked <ScottK> tumbleweed: Lack of sponsoring. ScottK: yeah, package like probably some thorough review (I and sponsor it) * ScottK neither. possible to get the source qt-gstreamer backported to <jalcine> Or there been no interest in doing (I'm willing). <ScottK> jalcine: You know Maverick goes of support in a month, right? <jalcine> eh, I know people who use Gutsy still. <ubottu> If new updated packages are built an then may into Ubuntu See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also!packaging <ScottK> jalcine: ^^^ <jalcine> Thank you <genupulas> some one plz http://pastebin.com/Qd2pzRXW
umbleweed> ScottK offered you Archive-admIn revIew, If iT wAs a sYnc fRom debian, and I oFFereD you an FFe if it was a sync. SO what'S bLOckiNG uPloadIng it to dEbIAN?
<GuEsT52270> HEre'S aN ExAmple Of tHe sort oF errors I geT trYiNg to install cERtAin (mainly -dEv iT seems) packagEs uNder 11.10 arMeL:
<GuESt52270> httP://paStebiN.com/sLkq8jBZ
<GuEst52270> I can stIlL InstalL Some pacKAGeS
<GueSt52270> apt isn't totally fUBaR - Yet - I think! :)
<Guest52270> hopefuLlY i wON'T haVe tO re-install!
<GeSer> diD You disaBLe THE UpdATes repository By chance?
<GueST52270> geSer, Don'T tHinK So but lEt me cHeCK..
<GuEst52270> geser, Ah! SEems i only had 'IMportaNT securiTY updateS' selecTed But Not tHE oThEr tHrEE so LEtS seE..
<GesEr> 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 Is In OneirIc whILE 4:4.7.4-0UBuntU8.1 is In onEiric-Updates
<Guest52270> gEseR, DunNO hoW it goT unchEckeD
<SCottK> TumbleWeed: LAcK of sponsoring.
<tuMbleWeed> Scottk: yeAh, And A pAckagE Like thAt pRobAbly desErves soME faIrLY THoRough review (I wouldn'T jUMP aNd sponsoR it)
 * ScoTTK NeITher.
<jalcInE> Is It poSSIble tO get THe Source qt-GstreaMEr BaCkporteD tO MaverIcK?
<jaLciNe> Or hAS theRe been No intereSt in dOIng so? (I'm willing).
<sCottK> jalcine: YOU kNOW MAVeriCk gOes out of supPort IN a moNth, rIGhT?
<jaLCine> eH, I knoW pEOpLE who use Gutsy still. :p
<SCoTtK>!bacKportS
<ubottu> If new uPdated UbunTU PAckages aRe buILt FOr an applicatioN, then They may go iNTo Ubuntu backpOrts. See hTtps://help.uBUNtu.com/coMmuNitY/UbUntUbAcKports - See also!PACkagInG
<ScottK> JalCine: ^^^
<jalCinE> ThAnk You *ClIcks*
<genupUlas> some OnE pLz HtTp://pAstebIN.com/Qd2pzrXw

umbleweed> ScottK offeredyou archiv e-adm inrev ie w, i f it  was a sync fr o m de bian, and I offered yo u anFF e  ifi twas a  sync.S ow h at' sbl ock in g  u pload ing  it toDebian?
<G ues t5 2270> Here's an  example o f t he sort of e rro rs I g et  tr y ing t o i nstal l cert a in (ma inly -dev  i t  seems )  packag e s  u nder  11.10 armel:
<Gu e st 5 2270> http://p astebi n. c om / s LKQ 8jB Z
<Guest52 27 0> Ic an stil l  i n s t all some packages 
<Guest5227 0 > a pt isn 't  to t ally f ubar-y et- I think!:)
< Guest5227 0> Hop e fully I won't h ave to  re -in stal l !<g ese r> did yo u d i sab le the u pd at es re posi t o r y  bycha nce? 
<Gue st52270> gese r,Don' t  th ink s o but  let  m e che ck..
< Guest 52 270> geser, Ah!  See ms I only  ha d'Im po rtant securi tyupd ates' s elected but  n o t th e other three so l et s se e..
<ges er> 4: 4 .7 .4 - 0ubuntu8  i s i n on e i ric w hile 4: 4.7.4-0u buntu8 . 1is  in one ir ic-upd at es<Gu est52 2 70>geser,  Dunno h ow it got unchecked< ScottK> tumbl e we e d :L ackofsponsoring. 
<tu m blew eed> Sc ott K : yea h, an da  p a ckage like that pro ba bly de serve s some fairly  thoroughr e v iew (I w ould n 't jump and spons or it )
 * Scott K  neither .
<ja lcine> I s it poss i b le to ge t t hesou rce q t- gstreamer bac k p orte dto Mave ric k?
<jal cin e>Orhas  t here been  no inte re st  i ndoi ng so ?  (I'm wi ll ing ). 
<S cottK >  jalci ne: Y ou k no wM ave rick go e so u t of  s up port  in  a  mont h, r i ght ?
<jalc ine> eh,I k n ow p eo pl e who u se Gutsy stil l.  :p
<Scott K> !ba ckport s <ubottu>  If new updated Ubuntup ackages  ar e bui lt f or an app lic ation,  th e n they  may g o int oUbu n t u Bac k p or ts.  S ee https:/ / h elp .ubun tu .com /commun ity/UbuntuBackport s  -See also!pack agi ng
< S c ot tK> ja l cin e: ^^^ < jalcine> Thankyou *click s* <g enupulas>s ome  o ne plzhttp:// paste b in.com/ Qd2pzRXW
umbleweed> ScottK_offered you_archive-admin review, if it_was a_sync_from debian,_and_I offered you_an FFe if_it was a sync._So what's blocking_uploading_it to Debian?
<Guest52270> Here's an example of the sort of errors I get trying_to_install certain_(mainly_-dev_it seems) packages under 11.10_armel:
<Guest52270> http://pastebin.com/sLKQ8jBZ
<Guest52270> I can still_install some_packages
<Guest52270> apt isn't totally fubar - yet -_I_think! :)
<Guest52270> Hopefully_I won't have to re-install!
<geser> did you disable the_updates repository by chance?
<Guest52270> geser, Don't_think so but_let_me_check..
<Guest52270> geser, Ah! Seems_I only had 'Important security updates'_selected but not the other three_so lets see..
<geser> 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 is in oneiric_while 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8.1 is in oneiric-updates
<Guest52270> geser,_Dunno how it got unchecked
<ScottK>_tumbleweed: Lack_of sponsoring.
<tumbleweed> ScottK: yeah, and_a package like_that probably_deserves some fairly_thorough review (I wouldn't jump and_sponsor it)
 *_ScottK neither.
<jalcine> Is it possible to_get_the source qt-gstreamer_backported_to_Maverick?
<jalcine> Or_has there been_no_interest in_doing_so? (I'm willing).
<ScottK> jalcine: You know_Maverick_goes out of support in a month,_right?
<jalcine> eh, I know_people_who use Gutsy still._:p
<ScottK>!backports
<ubottu> If new updated Ubuntu_packages are built for an application,_then they_may go_into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also!packaging
<ScottK> jalcine: ^^^
<jalcine> Thank_you *clicks*
<genupulas> some one plz http://pastebin.com/Qd2pzRXW
