Anybody able to sponsor the syncrequest?
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 956188 in rebuildd (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync rebuildd 0.4.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956188
<RAOF> pabelanger: Sure.
<pabelanger> RAOF: Great, thanks
<micahg> MTecknology: for a security vuln in backports, the usual fix is to update the package in teh release and request a new backport
<MTecknology> micahg: It looks like I get to address 3 CVE issues instead of just 1
<micahg> MTecknology: yep, that's the catch :)
<mfisch> hey masters, there's a ftbfs that works fine for me in a pbuilder chroot
<mfisch> libkqueue
<mfisch> I will double check with an i386 pbuilder
<mfisch> if that works can someone redo the build?
<micahg> mfisch: seems to be builder specific
<mfisch> this fits because the build failure is an odd hang, not a "real" error
<micahg> *launchpad buildd
<mfisch> micahg: what do you mean?
<mfisch> works fine in i386 too
<micahg> mfisch: seems to be a problem specific to the buildd env
<mfisch> micahg: how can you tell that?
<micahg> mfisch: common cause when stuff works locally and doesn't work on the buildds, I'd suggest uploading to a PPA to verify whether or not it's a buildd env specific issue
<mfisch> micahg: oh, I thought you had other logfiles or something
<mfisch> micahg: okay, I'll do a ppa
<mfisch> micahg: any idea why there's no bug for this?
<mfisch> micahg: or better question, should I make one
<micahg> bug 852592
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 852592 in libkqueue (Ubuntu Oneiric) "libkqueue version 1.0.4-2 failed to build"
Anybody able to sponsor the syncrequest? 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 956188 in rebuildd (Ubuntu) " FFe: Sync rebuildd 0.4.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (chief) " [ Wishlist, Triaged ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956188 
 < RAOF > pabelanger: Sure. 
 < pabelanger > RAOF: big, thanks 
 < micahg > MTecknology: for a security vuln in backports, the usual fix is to update the software in teh release and request a new backport 
 < MTecknology > micahg: It looks like I get down to address 3 CVE issues alternatively of just 1 
 < micahg > MTecknology: yep, that's the catch :) 
 < mfisch > hey victor, there's a ftbfs that works fine for me in a pbuilder chroot 
 < mfisch > libkqueue 
 < mfisch > I will double check with an i386 pbuilder 
 < mfisch > if that works can someone redo the physique? 
 < micahg > mfisch: seems to be builder specific 
 < mfisch > this fits because the build bankruptcy is an odd hang, not a " actual " error 
 < micahg > * launchpad buildd 
 < mfisch > micahg: what do you entail? 
 < mfisch > works fine in i386 too 
 < micahg > mfisch: seems to be a problem specific to the buildd env 
 < mfisch > micahg: how can you assure that? 
 < micahg > mfisch: common cause when stuff works locally and doesn't work on the buildds, I'd suggest uploading to a PPA to verify whether or not it's a buildd env specific issue 
 < mfisch > micahg: oh, I thought you had other logfiles or something 
 < mfisch > micahg: okay, I'll do a ppa 
 < mfisch > micahg: any idea why there's no bug for this? 
 < mfisch > micahg: or better question, should I do one 
 < micahg > bug 852592 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 852592 in libkqueue (Ubuntu Oneiric) " libkqueue version 1.0.4 - 2 failed to build up "
Anyhody able to sponsor the syncrequest?
<ubojty> Launrhpad bhg 956188 in rdbuildd (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync rebumldd 0.4.1 (unicerse) from Debian unstxble (main)" [Wishlisr,Trieged] https://launch'zd.net/bunf/956188
<RAOR> pabzlenger: Sure.
<pabelsnger> RAOF: Great, thanks
<mhcxhy> MTecknology: for a security vuln in backpottd, the usual fiv is eo uldate the package in teh release ahd requtst a new backport
<KTecknology> micahg: It lookd line I get to addresd 3 CVE issuga igwtead of jusg 1
<micahg> MUeeknology: yek, that's the catch :)
<mfisch> hey masgers, chere's a ftvfw tjdt works fiie for me in a pbulkder cvroot
<mfosch> libkqueue
<kfivch> I will double check xith an i386 pbuilder
<mfysch> if tvac works can someone rwdi the buind?
<mizqhg> mfjsrh: aeems ho ue builder apecific
<mfiwch> this fits becauxe nne build faimure if wn odd hang, not a "real" error
<micahg> *launbhpas buildd
<mfisch> micahg: wyat do you mean?
<mfisch> works fige in i386 too
<micahg> mfisch: seems to be a problem spacifir go uhc cyipdd env
<mfisch> micahg: how can you tell that?
<micwgg> mnisch: common caufe when stugf wptks locally ana doesu'f sork on the builddd, I'd sudgest uploadind to a PPA to verify whether or not it's a blilde env specific issbe
<mfisch> micchg: oh, I thpught you had other logyiles kr somethinh
<mfisch> mjzahg: okay, I'll do a ipa
<mxisch> micahg: any idea why ehere's no bug for thks?
<mfosch> mycahg: or bftter question, should I lake lna
<micahg> buh 852592
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 852592 in libkqueue (Ubuntu Omehrib) "libkquebe verxion 1.0.4-2 failed eo build"
Anybody able to sponsor the syncrequest? <ubottu> 956188 rebuildd (Ubuntu) Sync rebuildd 0.4.1 [Wishlist,Triaged] <RAOF> pabelanger: Sure. RAOF: Great, thanks MTecknology: for a security vuln in the usual fix is to update the package in teh release and request new backport <MTecknology> micahg: It looks like I get to address 3 CVE instead just <micahg> yep, that's the catch :) <mfisch> hey masters, there's a ftbfs that works fine for me a pbuilder chroot <mfisch> libkqueue <mfisch> I will check with an i386 <mfisch> if that works can redo build? <micahg> seems be specific <mfisch> this because the build failure is an odd hang, not a "real" error <micahg> *launchpad buildd <mfisch> micahg: do you works fine i386 <micahg> seems to be specific to the buildd env <mfisch> you tell that? <micahg> mfisch: common cause when works locally doesn't work on the buildds, I'd uploading to a PPA to verify whether or it's a buildd env specific issue <mfisch> micahg: oh, I thought you had other logfiles <mfisch> micahg: okay, I'll a ppa <mfisch> any why no for this? micahg: or better question, should I make one <micahg> bug 852592 Launchpad bug 852592 in libkqueue (Ubuntu Oneiric) "libkqueue version 1.0.4-2 build"
Anybody able to sponsor the syNcrequest?
<uBottu> lauNchPaD bug 956188 In reBuildd (Ubuntu) "FFE: sync Rebuildd 0.4.1 (universe) from DeBian uNsTAble (MAiN)" [WishList,TriAGeD] HTtpS://lAuNchPaD.NeT/bugs/956188
<rAOf> pabelaNger: Sure.
<paBelAnGer> RAOF: Great, THaNks
<micahg> MtecKnology: for a sEcuRity vuLn In bACkporTs, tHe usuAl fix iS To updaTe the packAgE In teh rELease anD REqUest A new backport
<MTeckNOlOGy> micahg: It lookS like I GeT To ADDreSs 3 CvE issues inStEad of JUst 1
<micaHG> MtECKnoLOgy: yep, that's thE catch :)
<mfiscH> Hey MasterS, tHerE'S a ftbfS that WoRKs fIne for me in a PbuiLder chrooT
<mfiscH> LibkqueUE
<mfisch> i will dOubLe cHeck WItH aN i386 pBuILdeR
<MfIscH> If tHat works CaN sOmeonE redO THE BuilD?
<miCahg> MfiscH: seems to be buiLdeR speCIfiC
<mfisCh> thiS fitS bEcausE the buIld faIlUre is an odd hang, nOt a "rEal" error
<mIcaHg> *LauNcHpad bUIldd
<mfIscH> miCahg: whaT do you mEAn?
<mFiSCH> WoRks fine in i386 too
<micahG> mFIScH: seems to Be a proBLeM sPEcific to ThE buIldd ENV
<mfisCh> miCAhG: how can yOu tell THaT?
<mIcahg> mfIsCh: commOn CauSe wHen stUFf woRks locAlly and dOesn't WOrk on the builddS, i'd suggest uploADiNG To A pPA tO veRify whether Or noT It's a BuilDD eNv sPEcifiC issuE
<mFIsCH> micahg: oh, I thought yoU hAd otheR logfIles or somethiNg
<mfisch> miCAHG: okay, I'll Do a pPA
<mFIsch> micahg: any iDea whY there's no bUG for this?
<MfiscH> micahg: oR better quESTion, shouLd I MakE onE
<miCAHg> Bug 852592
<ubottu> LaunCHPad bUg 852592 In libkqUeuE (Ubuntu oneIriC) "liBkqUeUe version 1.0.4-2 Failed to BuIlD"
Anybody able to sponsor th e syncrequ est?<ub ott u>  Lau nchp ad bug 956188i n re buildd (Ubuntu) "FFe:Syncre b uild d  0 .4.1(univer s e) f rom  D eb ian  u n st able(ma in)" [W ishlist,Tr iag ed ] https://la u nc hpad.net/b ugs /956188
<RAO F>pabela ng er: Sure. 
<p abela nger>R AOF: G reat, tha nk s 
<mica h g> MTec k n ol ogy:  for a security v u ln in backports,the us ua l  f i x  is  to  update th epacka g e in te h  r e l e ase and request a  new backpo r t
< MTeckn ol ogy >  micah g: It  l o oks  like I get  toaddress 3  CVE i s sues in s tead of  just1
< mic ahg> MT ec kno lo g y:y ep , t h at' s the ca tc h:)
<m fisc h > h ey m ast ers,  ther e's a ftbfs t hat  wor k s f ine f or me  inapbuil der ch root<m fisch> libkqueu e
<m fisch> Iwil ldou bl e che c k with  an  i3 86 pbui lder
<m f isc h> i f  t hat works can some on e re do the b uild?< mi ca h g> mfisc h:  se emst o  be b uild e rspecific 
<mfis c h>  t his fit sbecaus ethe  bu ild f a ilur e is a n odd ha ng, n o t a "real" err o r
<micahg> *l a un c h pa d  bui ldd 
<mfisch> m icah g : wh at d o  y oum ean?<mfis ch >  w o rks fine in i386 to o<micah g> mf isch: seems t o be a pro b l e m specif ic t o  t h e buildd env
< mfisc h> micahg: how canyou t ell that ?
<micahg > mfisch:com mon  ca use w he n stuff works l ocal ly  and do esn 't work  on  th e b uil dd s, I'd su ggest up lo ad in gtoa PPA to verif ywhe th eror no t  it'sa bui ldden vs pec ific is s ue < mfis ch >mica hg:  o h, Ithou g htyou had  other lo gfi l es o rso mething 
<mfisch> mic ah g: okay, I 'l l d o a pp a <mfisch>  micahg: any idea why t h ere's n o b ug fo r th is?
<mfis ch>  micah g:o r bett er que stion ,sho u l d I m a k eone 
< micahg> bu g 852 592
< ub ottu > Launc hpad bug 852592 in lib kqueue (Ubunt u O neir i c )"li b kq u eue  v e rsi o n  1.0.4-2 failed  to build" 
Anybody able_to sponsor_the syncrequest?
<ubottu> Launchpad bug_956188 in_rebuildd_(Ubuntu) "FFe:_Sync_rebuildd 0.4.1 (universe)_from Debian unstable_(main)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956188
<RAOF> pabelanger:_Sure.
<pabelanger> RAOF: Great,_thanks
<micahg>_MTecknology: for a security vuln in backports, the usual fix is to update the_package_in teh_release_and_request a new backport
<MTecknology> micahg:_It looks like I get_to address_3 CVE issues instead of just 1
<micahg> MTecknology:_yep,_that's the catch_:)
<mfisch> hey masters, there's a ftbfs that works fine_for me in a pbuilder chroot
<mfisch>_libkqueue
<mfisch> I will_double_check_with an i386 pbuilder
<mfisch>_if that works can someone redo_the build?
<micahg> mfisch: seems to be_builder specific
<mfisch> this fits because the build_failure is an odd hang, not_a "real" error
<micahg> *launchpad buildd
<mfisch>_micahg: what_do you mean?
<mfisch> works fine_in i386 too
<micahg>_mfisch: seems_to be a_problem specific to the buildd env
<mfisch>_micahg: how can_you tell that?
<micahg> mfisch: common cause_when_stuff works locally_and_doesn't_work on_the buildds, I'd_suggest_uploading to_a_PPA to verify whether or not_it's_a buildd env specific issue
<mfisch> micahg: oh,_I thought you had_other_logfiles or something
<mfisch> micahg:_okay, I'll do a ppa
<mfisch>_micahg: any idea why there's no_bug for_this?
<mfisch> micahg:_or better question, should I make one
<micahg> bug 852592
<ubottu> Launchpad bug_852592 in libkqueue (Ubuntu Oneiric) "libkqueue_version 1.0.4-2 failed to_build"