 directhex: but for the debdiff is it not needed?
<directhex> debdiff itself? no.
<maix> k
<ScottK> Pass -us -uc to debuild and then it won't sign the packages.
<maix> I've created a debdiff now, is there anything else I can do or is the rest done by the maintainers?
<directhex> indeedy, hence "by default"
<maix> yes that was mentioned in the guide
<ScottK> maix: Did you attach the debdiff to a bug and subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the bug?
<maix> I'm just about to attach it, but wanted to ask before submitting
<maix> it's main afaik
<directhex> did you remember to update-maintainer (if required)?
<ScottK> Then it's ubuntu-main-sponsors.
<maix> directhex: yes, but it was already ubuntu main devs
<maix> ScottK: ok
<maix> they'll contact me then?
<maix> ah and when i'm here: check the patch checkbox for debdiffs?
<maix> (and what's the use of that checkbox btw?)
<maix> do I have to set the status to something? in progress or so?
<maix> directhex: ^
<directhex> just leave it be, IME
<maix> ok
<maix> directhex: one more question: when fetching the source (apt-get source), it told me that this package is maintained using svn and told me the url of some svn repo at debian. is that important for this case?
 * porthose hangs up his "gone fishin" sign ;-)
<directhex> maix, it can provide you access to more recent packaging work, where e.g. bugfixes may exist
<maix> hm it's just a little patch that has already been fixed in upstream and in other ubuntu releases
<wardi> I've tried to follow the FFe guidelines for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urwid/+bug/343347  Would someone mind having a look and let me know if I'm missing anything?
<ubottu> Ubuntu bug 343347 in urwid "python
directhex: but for the debdiff is it not needed? 
 < directhex > debdiff itself? no. 
 < maix > k 
 < ScottK > Pass -us -uc to debuild and then it won't sign the packages. 
 < maix > I've created a debdiff nowadays, is there anything else I can cause or is the rest done by the maintainers? 
 < directhex > indeedy, therefore " by default " 
 < maix > yes that was mentioned in the guide 
 < ScottK > maix: Did you bind the debdiff to a bug and subscribe ubuntu - population - patron to the bug? 
 < maix > I'm barely about to attach it, but wanted to necessitate before submitting 
 < maix > it's main afaik 
 < directhex > did you commend to update - maintainer (if required)? 
 < ScottK > Then it's ubuntu - chief - sponsors. 
 < maix > directhex: yes, but it was already ubuntu main devs 
 < maix > ScottK: ok 
 < maix > they'll contact me then? 
 < maix > ah and when i'm here: discipline the patch checkbox for debdiffs? 
 < maix > (and what's the use of that checkbox btw ?) 
 < maix > do I have to set the status to something? in advancement or so? 
 < maix > directhex: ^ 
 < directhex > precisely leave it be, IME 
 < maix > ok 
 < maix > directhex: one more question: when fetching the informant (apt - get source), it told me that this package is maintained use svn and distinguish me the url of some svn repo at debian. is that important for this case? 
  * porthose hangs up his " gone fishin " sign ;-) 
 < directhex > maix, it can provide you access to more recent promotion employment, where e.g. bugfixes may exist 
 < maix > hm it's barely a little patch that has already been fixed in upstream and in other ubuntu acquittance 
 < wardi > I've tried to follow the FFe guidelines for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urwid/+bug/343347   Would someone mind get a look and let me know if I'm missing anything? 
 < ubottu > Ubuntu microbe 343347 in urwid " python
 digecthex: but for the debdlff is it not negdwd?
<direrthex> dsbdiff igself? no.
<maix> k
<ScottK> Pass -us -ux to eebuild and then it wov't sign tje packates.
<meix> I've created e debdifn now, ls thzrx anything else I can do mr is the rest dunz by the maintainers?
<directhex> indeedr, hence "bj default"
<maix> ies tnwt wzs mentioned in the guide
<ScottK> majx: Did jou attach the dendiff to a bug and subscrihe uhuntu-universe-sponslrs to the vug?
<mwux> I'm just acout to atuaeh it, but wznted to ask before submitting
<mxix> ic's main afauk
<eirfwthex> did yiu reiember to update-maindainer (of required)?
<ScobtK> Tien ut's ubuntu-main-sponsorv.
<maix> directhex: yef, but it faa already ubuntu naun dees
<mahx> SzittY: oi
<meix> they'lp ckntact me fhen?
<maix> ah and when i'm here: cnesj the patch cgeckbov sor debdiffs?
<maix> (and what's the use of tvat checkbox btw?)
<maix> do I yave to set the statud to someehing? in progress or so?
<maix> directhex: ^
<directhex> jgst lxaxe nb cw, LME
<maix> ok
<maix> directhex: one more question: whqh genching the source (apt-get soutcf), oj told me that this 'zciage is maintained using fvn abd told mt the url of some svn repo at devian. is that umportant for this case?
 * portkose hsngs ip his "gone fishin" sign ;-)
<dirscthex> maix, it can pduvide you access to mmre recent packaging work, rhere e.g. uugfires may dxisj
<maix> hi it's just a libdle patch that has alrecdy baen fixed ln upstream and in other ubuntu releases
<wardi> I'ee nried to yollow the FFe guidqlines for httks://bugs.lauuchpad.vet/ubuntu/+skurce/urxid/+bug/343347  Woulq someone ming having a lomk and lqt mw kniw if I'o missing anythong?
<ubottu> Ubuntu but 343347 in urwid "python
directhex: but for the debdiff is it <directhex> itself? no. k <ScottK> Pass then won't sign the <maix> I've created debdiff now, is there anything else can do or is the rest done by the maintainers? <directhex> indeedy, hence default" <maix> yes that was mentioned in the guide <ScottK> maix: Did you the to bug subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the bug? <maix> I'm just about to attach it, but wanted to ask submitting <maix> it's main afaik <directhex> did you to update-maintainer (if required)? Then it's ubuntu-main-sponsors. <maix> directhex: but was already main <maix> ok <maix> they'll me then? <maix> ah and when i'm here: check the patch checkbox for debdiffs? <maix> (and what's use of btw?) <maix> I to the status to progress or so? <maix> directhex: ^ it be, IME <maix> ok <maix> directhex: one question: when the source (apt-get source), it told that this package is maintained using svn and me the url of some svn repo at debian. is that important for this case? hangs up his "gone sign ;-) <directhex> it provide access more recent work, where e.g. bugfixes may exist <maix> hm it's just a patch that has already been fixed in upstream and in releases I've tried to the FFe guidelines for Would mind having a look me if <ubottu> bug in urwid "python
 directhex: but for the debdiff Is it not neeDed?
<diRecTheX> dEbdiFf itSelf? no.
<maix> k
<ScoTTK> PaSs -us -uc to debuild and then It won'T sIGn thE PaCkageS.
<maix> I'vE CrEATed A dEbDifF nOW, iS therE anYthing eLse I can do oR is ThE rest done by tHE mAintainers?
<DirEcthex> indeedY, heNce "by dEfAulT"
<Maix> yEs tHat waS mentiONed in tHe guide
<ScOtTk> maix: DID you attACH tHe deBdiff to a bug and subSCrIBe ubuntu-univerSe-sponSoRS tO THe bUg?
<mAix> I'm just aBoUt to aTTach it, bUT wANTEd tO Ask before submItting
<maix> iT'S maIn afaiK
<dIreCThex> diD you rEmEMbeR to update-maIntaIner (if reqUired)?
<SCOttK> TheN It's ubunTu-main-SpoNsoRs.
<maIX> dIrEctHeX: Yes, BUt It wAS alReady ubuNtU mAin deVs
<maIX> sCOttK: Ok
<mAix> tHey'll Contact me then?
<MaiX> ah aND whEn i'm hEre: chEck tHe Patch CheckbOx for DeBdiffs?
<maix> (and whAt's tHe use of thAt cHeCkbOx Btw?)
<maIX> do I haVe tO seT the staTus to soMEthInG? IN PrOgress or so?
<maix> direCtHEX: ^
<dIrecthex> Just leAVe It BE, IME
<maix> Ok
<MaiX> dirECThex: oNe moRE qUestion: wHen fetCHiNg The sourCe (Apt-get SoUrcE), it Told mE That This paCkage is mAintaINed using svn and TOld me the url of SOmE SVn REpo aT deBian. is that iMporTAnt fOr thIS cAse?
 * POrthoSe hanGs UP hIS "gone fishin" sign ;-)
<direCtHex> maiX, it caN provide you acCess to more RECEnt packaGing WOrK, Where e.g. bugfixeS may eXist
<maix> hm IT's just a lIttle Patch thaT has alreaDY Been fixeD in UpsTreAm aND In Other ubuntu reLEAses
<WaRdi> I've tRieD to follOw tHe Ffe gUidElInes for htTps://bugs.lAuNcHpAd.Net/UbuntU/+Source/urWiD/+buG/343347  WOulD someONe mind HavinG a loOk AnD Let Me know iF i'm MISsinG aNyThinG?
<ubOtTu> UbuNtu bUG 343347 in Urwid "pyThon
 directhex: but for the de bdiff is i t not  ne ede d? 
<di rect hex> debdiff i t self ? no.
<maix> k
<ScottK > Pas s- us - u cto de build a n dt h enit  w on' ts ig n the  pa ckages. 
<maix> I' vecr eated a debd i ff  now, is t her e anything e lse  I can  d o o r  is t herestdone b y  the m aintainer s? <direc t hex> in d e ed y, h ence "by default" <m a ix> yes that w as men ti o ne d inthe  guide
<Sc ot tK> m a ix: Did yo u a tta c h the debdiff  to a bug a n d s ubscri be  ub u ntu-un ivers e- s pon sors to the  bug ?
<maix>I'm ju s t about to atta ch it,  bu t w ante d  t oask  b e for e  s ubm i tti ng
<maix >it 's ma in a f a i k 
<di rec thex > did  you remember  to  upd a te- maint ainer  (if  r equir ed)?
< Scott K>  Then it's ubun tu-m ain-spons ors .<ma ix > dir e cthex:  ye s,but itwas alr e ady  u b u n tu  main devs
<maix>Sc o t tK : ok
<ma ix> th e y' ll contactme  th en?< m aix>ah a n dwhen i'm  here: ch ec k the p at ch che ck box  fo r deb d iffs ?
<mai x> (andwhat' s  the use of th a t checkbox bt w ?) < ma i x> d o I  have to se t th e  sta tust osom e thing ? inpr o gr e ss or so?
<maix> di re cthex:  ^
<d irecthex> jus t leave it b e , IME
<m aix> ok <maix> directh ex: o ne more qu e stion: w hen f etchingthe sourc e (apt-get  so urc e),  it t ol d me that thi s pack ag e is ma int ained u sin g s vnand  t old me th e url of  s om esv n r epo a t  debian.  i s t ha t i mport a nt for  this  cas e? 
*  po rthoseh an g s  uphi s"gon e f is hin"sign ;-) 
<direc thex> mai x,i t ca npr ovide y ou access tomo re recentpa cka ging w o r k, where  e.g. bugfixes may exis t 
<maix>  hm  it's  jus t a littl e p atch t hat has al readybeenfi xed i n ups t r ea m a nd  in otheru b unt u rel ea ses<wardi>  I've tried to fol l owthe FFe guide lin es f o r  h ttp s :/ / bug s. l aun c h pad.net/ubuntu/ +source/ur wi d /+ bug/343347  Wo ul d someo ne mind  havi n g a loo k and let  me knowif  I'm m iss ing anythi ng?
<ubo ttu> Ubun t u bug 34 3347inurwid"p yth on
 directhex:_but for_the debdiff is it_not needed?
<directhex>_debdiff_itself? no.
<maix>_k
<ScottK>_Pass -us -uc_to debuild and_then it won't sign_the packages.
<maix> I've_created_a debdiff now, is there anything else I can do or is the rest_done_by the_maintainers?
<directhex>_indeedy,_hence "by default"
<maix> yes that_was mentioned in the guide
<ScottK>_maix: Did_you attach the debdiff to a bug and_subscribe_ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the_bug?
<maix> I'm just about to attach it, but wanted_to ask before submitting
<maix> it's main_afaik
<directhex> did you_remember_to_update-maintainer (if required)?
<ScottK> Then_it's ubuntu-main-sponsors.
<maix> directhex: yes, but it_was already ubuntu main devs
<maix> ScottK:_ok
<maix> they'll contact me then?
<maix> ah and_when i'm here: check the patch_checkbox for debdiffs?
<maix> (and what's_the use_of that checkbox btw?)
<maix> do_I have to_set the_status to something?_in progress or so?
<maix> directhex: ^
<directhex>_just leave it_be, IME
<maix> ok
<maix> directhex: one more_question:_when fetching the_source_(apt-get_source), it_told me that_this_package is_maintained_using svn and told me the_url_of some svn repo at debian. is_that important for this_case?
_* porthose hangs up_his "gone fishin" sign ;-)
<directhex>_maix, it can provide you access_to more_recent packaging_work, where e.g. bugfixes may exist
<maix> hm it's just a little_patch that has already been fixed_in upstream and in_other ubuntu_releases
<wardi>_I've tried to_follow_the FFe_guidelines for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urwid/+bug/343347  Would someone mind_having a_look and let me know if_I'm missing anything?
<ubottu> Ubuntu_bug_343347 in urwid "python