: imagine like a piece of software written in C, but with a license saying "you must ship the original C file with the compiled binary"
<minghua> LaserJock: and this tetex-src is the "C source file" part, which no user will need
<minghua> LaserJock: it won't hurt to sync it, of course, but I wouldn't put my time into it
<LaserJock> ok
<minghua> looking at the log, maybe LaserJock already wrote the mail?
<LaserJock>?
<minghua> LaserJock: I mean "<LaserJock> ok, I'll try to write something up", which is 20 minutes ago
<LaserJock> oh, I haven't yet, I was working on diffstats, changelogs, etc
<Amaranth> if that's the case we _have_ to have the new version
<LaserJock> I'm still trying to download the source package ;-)
<Amaranth> otherwise we're in violation of the license
<LaserJock> think so?
<minghua> Hmm, Amaranth is right, but do we have tetex-src in main?
<LaserJock> no Universe
<minghua> I really don't know how this is supposed to work, it's not as if we don't provide source pacakges
<minghua> maybe asking debian-tetex-maint@l.d.o list is a good idea...
<LaserJock> perhaps
<LaserJock> jeeze, the change in orig.tar.gz is 33MB :(
<minghua> LaserJock: I remember tetex 3 is a rewrite, so that won't surprise me
<LaserJock> it is more than double the current
<LaserJock> but it doesn't apper that the packaging has changed at all
<LaserJock> hmm, maybe not. the changelog says that they added a new package latex-source2e-doc that has pdf version of the latex documentation
<minghua> bash doesn't have <= comparison for strings?  this is annoying
* minghua will use dpkg --compare-versions for good measure then
<G0SUB> dolson
<crimsun_> yay, patch 1 of z
: imagine like a piece of software written in C, but with a license saying " you must transport the original coulomb file with the compiled binary star " 
 < minghua > LaserJock: and this tetex - src is the " C reservoir file " part, which no drug user will want 
 < minghua > LaserJock: it won't hurt to synchronize it, of path, but I wouldn't put my prison term into it 
 < LaserJock > ok 
 < minghua > looking at the log, possibly LaserJock already wrote the mail? 
 < LaserJock >? 
 < minghua > LaserJock: I mean " < LaserJock > ok, I'll try to write something up ", which is 20 minutes ago 
 < LaserJock > oh, I haven't yet, I was ferment on diffstats, changelogs, etc 
 < Amaranth > if that's the case we _ have _ to have the modern version 
 < LaserJock > I'm still trying to download the source software ;-) 
 < Amaranth > otherwise we're in rape of the license 
 < LaserJock > think so? 
 < minghua > Hmm, Amaranth is right, but do we own tetex - src in main? 
 < LaserJock > no Universe 
 < minghua > I really don't know how this is supposed to work, it's not as if we don't leave source pacakges 
 < minghua > maybe asking debian - tetex - maint@l.d.o list is a good idea... 
 < LaserJock > perhaps 
 < LaserJock > jeeze, the change in orig.tar.gz is 33 MB :( 
 < minghua > LaserJock: I remember tetex 3 is a rewrite, so that won't storm me 
 < LaserJock > it is more than double the current 
 < LaserJock > but it doesn't apper that the promotion has changed at all 
 < LaserJock > hmm, maybe not. the changelog suppose that they added a new package latex - source2e - doc that has pdf interpretation of the latex documentation 
 < minghua > bash doesn't have < = comparison for strings?   this is annoying 
 * minghua will practice dpkg --compare - versions for good measure then 
 < G0SUB > dolson 
 < crimsun _ > yay, patch 1 of z
: imwgine like a piece of sontware written iu C, but with z licensd saying "you must ship the ocigibal C file with the compilea binary"
<mpnghua> LawerJixk: and this tetex-sve is fme "C viurce file" parj, which no uver will need
<mhnehba> LaserJock: it won't hurt to sync it, of coutsf, but I wouldn'j put iy tjme into it
<LaserJock> ok
<minghua> looiing at the log, maybr LaserJock already wrote hhe lail?
<LaserJock>?
<minghka> LaserJocj: I iwan "<LaserJocy> ok, I'll tgv to write aomething up", which is 20 minutes xgo
<LaxerJock> oh, I haggn't yet, I waw worhing on diffstats, chdngelogx, etc
<Amaranth> lf thet's rhe case we _have_ to heve the new version
<LwserJock> H'm still trying to eoqnloag tha sojece padkege ;-)
<Amarajth> otherwise we're in viilation of the licemsq
<OaserJock> thihk so?
<myndhua> Hmm, Amaranth is right, but do we hane tstex-src in main?
<LaserJocj> no Universe
<minghua> L really qon't know how this is supposed to work, it's not as if wx aon'u ivoviaw dource pacakges
<minghua> maybe asking debian-tetqs-msikt@l.d.o list is a nood idea...
<LaserJock> pfrnwps
<LaserJock> geeze, cge change in orig.tar.hz is 33MF :(
<minthua> LasewJocl: I remember tetex 3 is a reqrite, so than wob't surprise me
<LasexJock> it is oore than double the current
<LasexJock> gut it doesj't apper ffat the packagine hss changed at all
<LaserJock> him, maybe iot. tke changdlog says ehat they wdded a new package lated-souree2e-dow that has pdf version of the latex documxitation
<minghus> tasv doesn't have <= comparison sor strings?  tkis is aunoyine
* minghua sill usx dpkg --compawe-versions fos good measurx then
<G0SUF> dooson
<xrimsun_> hay, patch 1 of a
: imagine like a piece of software C, with a saying "you must with compiled binary" <minghua> and this tetex-src the "C source file" part, which user will need <minghua> LaserJock: it won't hurt to sync it, of course, I wouldn't put my time into it <LaserJock> ok <minghua> looking at the maybe already the <LaserJock>? <minghua> LaserJock: I mean "<LaserJock> ok, I'll try to write something up", which is 20 ago <LaserJock> oh, I haven't yet, I was on diffstats, changelogs, etc if that's the case we to the new <LaserJock> still to download the package ;-) <Amaranth> otherwise we're in violation of the license <LaserJock> think so? <minghua> Hmm, Amaranth is but do tetex-src in <LaserJock> Universe I really don't this is supposed to work, it's we don't provide source pacakges <minghua> maybe asking list is good idea... <LaserJock> perhaps <LaserJock> jeeze, change in orig.tar.gz is 33MB :( <minghua> LaserJock: remember tetex 3 is a rewrite, so that won't surprise me <LaserJock> it is more the current <LaserJock> but doesn't apper that packaging changed all hmm, maybe the changelog says that they added a new package latex-source2e-doc that pdf version of the latex documentation <minghua> bash doesn't have for this is annoying minghua will use dpkg for measure then <G0SUB> dolson patch of
: imagine like a piece of softwaRe written iN C, but WitH a lIcEnse SayiNg "you must ship tHE oriGinal C file with the compiLed biNaRY"
<minGHuA> LaseRJock: anD ThIS TetEx-SrC is ThE "c sOurce FilE" part, whIch no user wIll NeEd
<minghua> LasERJOck: it won't hUrt To sync it, of coUrsE, but I wOuLdn'T Put my TimE into It
<LaseRjock> ok
<Minghua> loOkINg at thE Log, maybE lAsErJoCk already wrote the MAiL?
<laserJock>?
<minghUa> LaseRJOCk: i MEan "<lasErJock> ok, I'lL tRy to wRIte someTHiNG UP", whICh is 20 minutes agO
<LaserJock> oH, i haVen't yeT, I Was WOrking On difFsTAts, Changelogs, eTc
<AmAranth> if tHat's thE Case we _hAVe_ to havE the neW veRsiOn
<LaSErjoCk> I'M sTIll TRyIng TO doWnload thE sOuRce paCkagE ;-)
<aMARantH> otHerwIse we'Re in violation Of tHe liCEnsE
<LaseRJock> ThinK sO?
<mingHua> Hmm, amaraNtH is right, but do we Have Tetex-src iN maIn?
<lasErjock> nO univerSe
<mIngHua> I reaLly don't KNow HoW THIs Is supposed to work, it'S nOT As If we don't ProvidE SoUrCE pacakgeS
<mIngHua> mAYBe askIng dEBiAn-tetex-mAint@l.d.O LiSt Is a good IdEa...
<LaseRJOck> PerHaps
<LASerJOck> jeeZe, the chaNge in ORig.tar.gz is 33MB :(
<miNGhua> LaserJock: i ReMEMbER tetEx 3 iS a rewrite, so That WOn't sUrprISe Me
<LASerJoCk> it iS mORe THan double the current
<laSerJocK> but iT doesn't apper tHat the packAGINg has chaNged AT aLL
<LaserJock> hmm, mAybe nOt. the changELog says tHat thEy added a New packagE LAtex-sourCe2e-Doc ThaT haS PDf Version of the lATEx doCuMentatiOn
<mInghua> bAsh DoeSn't HavE <= cOmparison For strinGs?  ThIs Is AnnOying
* MInghua wiLl Use DpKg --cOmparE-VersioNs for Good MeAsURe tHen
<G0SUB> DOlSON
<criMsUn_> Yay, pAtcH 1 oF z
: imagine like a piece ofsoftware w ritte n i n C ,butwith  a license say i ng " you must ship the orig inalCf ilew it h the  compil e db i nar y" 
< min gh u a>  Lase rJo ck: and  this tete x-s rc  is the "C s o ur ce file" p art , which no u ser  willne ed< mingh ua>  Lase rJock: it won 't hurt t os ync it ,  of cou r s e,  but  I wouldn't put m y  t i me into it
<La serJoc k> ok < min ghu a> looking  a t the log, ma y be L a ser J ock already w rote the ma i l?<Laser Jo ck> ? 
<ming hua>La s erJ ock: I mean  "<L aserJock>  ok, I ' ll tryt o write  somet hin g u p",w hi ch  is  2 0  mi n ut esa go<LaserJo ck >oh, I  hav e n ' t  yet , I  was  work ing on diffst ats , ch a nge logs,  etc<Ama ra nth>if tha t's t he  case we _have_  tohave thenew  v ers io n
<La s erJock > I 'mstill t rying t o  do wn l o a dthe source package  ; - ) 
< Amaranth > othe r wi se we're in  v iol atio n of th e li c en se
<Lase rJock> th in k so?
< mi nghua>  H mm,  Am arant h  isright,  but dowe ha v e tetex-src in main?
<LaserJ o ck > no Univ ers e
<minghua>  I r e ally  don ' tkno w  howthisis su p posed to work, it's  n ot asif we  don't provid e source p a c a kges
<mi nghu a >m aybe asking de bian- tetex-main t @l.d.o l ist i s a good  idea...< L aserJock > p erh aps 
<L a s er Jock> jeeze,t h e ch an ge in o rig .tar.gz  is  33 MB:(<m inghua> L aserJock :Ire me mbe r tet e x 3 is a  r ewr it e,so th a t won' t sur pris eme <La serJock >  i t is m or ethan  do ub le th e cu r ren t
<Lase rJock> bu t i t  doe sn 't  apperthat the pack ag ing has ch an ged  at al l <LaserJo ck> hmm, maybe not. the changel ogsaysthat  they add eda newpac k age la tex-so urce2 e- doc t hat h a s  p dfve rsion of t h e  la tex d oc umen tation<minghua> bash doe s n't  have <= comp ari sonf o rstr i ng s ? th i s i s annoying
* ming hua will u se dp kg --compa r e-v er sions f or good  meas u re then 
<G0SUB>dolson
<c ri msun _ >  ya y, patch 1  of z
: imagine_like a_piece of software written_in C,_but_with a_license_saying "you must_ship the original_C file with the_compiled binary"
<minghua> LaserJock:_and_this tetex-src is the "C source file" part, which no user will need
<minghua> LaserJock:_it_won't hurt_to_sync_it, of course, but I_wouldn't put my time into_it
<LaserJock> ok
<minghua>_looking at the log, maybe LaserJock already wrote_the_mail?
<LaserJock>?
<minghua> LaserJock: I_mean "<LaserJock> ok, I'll try to write something up",_which is 20 minutes ago
<LaserJock> oh,_I haven't yet,_I_was_working on diffstats, changelogs,_etc
<Amaranth> if that's the case we__have_ to have the new version
<LaserJock>_I'm still trying to download the source_package ;-)
<Amaranth> otherwise we're in violation_of the license
<LaserJock> think so?
<minghua>_Hmm, Amaranth_is right, but do we_have tetex-src in_main?
<LaserJock> no_Universe
<minghua> I really_don't know how this is supposed_to work, it's_not as if we don't provide_source_pacakges
<minghua> maybe asking_debian-tetex-maint@l.d.o_list_is a_good idea...
<LaserJock> perhaps
<LaserJock>_jeeze,_the change_in_orig.tar.gz is 33MB :(
<minghua> LaserJock: I_remember_tetex 3 is a rewrite, so that_won't surprise me
<LaserJock> it_is_more than double the_current
<LaserJock> but it doesn't apper_that the packaging has changed at_all
<LaserJock> hmm,_maybe not._the changelog says that they added a new package latex-source2e-doc that_has pdf version of the latex_documentation
<minghua> bash doesn't have_<= comparison_for_strings?  this_is_annoying
* minghua_will use dpkg --compare-versions for good measure_then
<G0SUB> dolson
<crimsun_>_yay, patch 1 of z