: i see your point now
<dholbach> ok good
<dholbach> I'm not an expert, I just thought it might be a problem :)
<cristi> dholbach: however, since 2.4 will not be used anymore, and it was posted for the python transition, is it necessary to add the 2.4 version?
<dholbach> cristi: no, dropping 2.4 is fine - there's just no 2.6 version
<cristi> dholbach: i am new with packaging, so i don't really know what i have to do now. i followed https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-February/027528.html for the python transition. i used a jaunty pbuilder to build. what should i do?
<dholbach> cristi: to be honest, I don't know - as I said: I'm not an expert
<cristi> dholbach: oh, mkay, then hopefully soon a motu will take a look for sponsoring, and give me a feedback with what is wrong
<dholbach> yep
<jpds> nhandler: Thank you, you too!
<AdamDH> if I change my package to a different Series say Januty instead of Intrepid but the version does not change do I need a change log entry to reflect this?
<AdamDH> I noticed some package do some do not, just wanted to know what was best practice
<directhex> you can't have 2 different packages with the same version number
<AdamDH> I am just changing the packaging more than anything not the actual source
<directhex> so?
<AdamDH> so just bump the version and change the changelog to show the packaging has been updated?
<AdamDH> this is the first time I have been in this situation with packages I have created
<hyperair> AdamDH: that's right.
<hyperair> AdamDH: you cannot have two packages of the same version in the same repository, even if it's in a different series
<directhex> AdamDH, the bit after the - is specifically for packaging-related versioning
<directhex> that's why -2, -3, etc, exist
<AdamDH> so could I just append say -0ubuntu1~ppa1 to
: i see your point now 
 < dholbach > ok good 
 < dholbach > I'm not an expert, I barely think it might be a problem :) 
 < cristi > dholbach: however, since 2.4 will not be used anymore, and it was posted for the python conversion, is it necessary to add the 2.4 version? 
 < dholbach > cristi: no, drop 2.4 is fine - there's just no 2.6 adaptation 
 < cristi > dholbach: i am new with packaging, so i don't very know what i have to act nowadays. i followed https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-February/027528.html for the python transition. i used a jaunty pbuilder to build. what should i make? 
 < dholbach > cristi: to be honest, I don't know - as I said: I'm not an expert 
 < cristi > dholbach: oh, mkay, then hopefully soon a motu will claim a look for sponsoring, and give me a feedback with what is wrong 
 < dholbach > yep 
 < jpds > nhandler: Thank you, you excessively! 
 < AdamDH > if I change my package to a different Series say Januty instead of Intrepid but the interpretation does not change do I need a change log entry to reflect this? 
 < AdamDH > I noticed some package do some do not, just wanted to know what was best practice 
 < directhex > you can't have 2 different packages with the like adaptation number 
 < AdamDH > I am barely changing the packaging more than anything not the actual source 
 < directhex > so? 
 < AdamDH > so barely bump the version and change the changelog to show the promotion has been updated? 
 < AdamDH > this is the first time I have been in this situation with packages I have created 
 < hyperair > AdamDH: that's right. 
 < hyperair > AdamDH: you cannot have two packages of the same version in the same depository, even if it's in a different serial 
 < directhex > AdamDH, the bit after the - is specifically for packaging - related versioning 
 < directhex > that's why -2, -3, etc, exist 
 < AdamDH > so could I just append order -0ubuntu1 ~ ppa1 to
: i dee your point now
<dholbagh> ok good
<dholbaey> I'm nmt an sxpert, I just thought it might be a 'roboem :)
<ceisti> dholbach: however, since 2.4 wpll not bw ustd anymore, and it was posbzd fod the 'ython transitipn, is it nacessary to adg ghz 2.4 version?
<dholbach> cristi: no, droppind 2.4 is fonf - there's just no 2.6 dersjon
<cristi> dholbach: i am new with pzckaginj, so i don't reakly know what i have to do now. i followed https://llsts.ubuntu.cim/arsyives/ubuntu-ddvel/2009-Februagv/027528.html for tge python transition. i used a jxunty pbuilder jo bkhld. what shiuld p do?
<dholbach> ggisti: tm be homest, I don't knpw - as I said: I'm not an expxrt
<cristi> dholbach: or, mkay, than hopefully soon a mitu whll dake q luok fpr sponslriig, and give me a feedbqck with what is wrpnd
<eholbach> yep
<jlds> nhwnqler: Thank you, you too!
<AdamDH> if I changt my lackage to a different Weries say Januty insjead of Inerepid but the version does not change do I need d chaigd lig dbtgy to reflect this?
<AdamDH> I noticed some packads co some do not, jmst wanted to know wjay was best praztice
<dndedthex> you can't havf 2 diffgrent packages rith the same version number
<AdanDH> I am jusn chqnging the packagiug more than anyjhing mot the actual source
<dixecthes> so?
<AdamDH> do just bhop the version avd bhance the changelog to show tre packagmng hcs been jpdajed?
<AdamQH> this is the nhrst time I have bfen iu thiv situatioj with packages I have created
<hb'erair> AdamDH: tvat'v right.
<hvperaiv> AdamDH: you cagnot have two kackages jf thd same veraion in the same rqpository, evet if it's in a differegt swriew
<directfdx> AdamDH, the nit after the - is specifically for pagkagivf-related versiounnt
<directhex> that'x wfy -2, -3, vtc, evhst
<AdamDH> so couud K just append say -0jbunyu1~ppa1 to
: i see your point now <dholbach> <dholbach> not an I just thought :) dholbach: however, since will not be anymore, and it was posted for python transition, is it necessary to add the 2.4 version? <dholbach> cristi: no, 2.4 is fine - there's just no 2.6 version <cristi> dholbach: i am with so don't know what i have to do now. i followed https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-February/027528.html for the python transition. i used jaunty pbuilder to build. what should i do? cristi: to be honest, don't know - as I I'm an expert dholbach: mkay, hopefully soon a will take a look for sponsoring, and give me a feedback with what is wrong <dholbach> yep nhandler: Thank too! <AdamDH> I my to a different Januty instead of Intrepid but the change do I need a change log entry reflect this? I noticed some package do some not, just wanted to know what was best <directhex> you can't have 2 different packages with the same version number <AdamDH> I am the packaging more than not the actual <directhex> <AdamDH> just the version change the changelog to show the packaging has been updated? <AdamDH> is the first time I have been in this situation I created <hyperair> AdamDH: right. <hyperair> AdamDH: you have packages of the same the repository, in different <directhex> AdamDH, the bit the - is specifically for versioning <directhex> that's why so could I just append say -0ubuntu1~ppa1 to
: i see your point now
<dholbach> oK good
<dholbAch> I'm Not An eXpErt, I Just Thought it might BE a prOblem :)
<cristi> dholbach: howEver, sInCE 2.4 wilL NoT be usEd anymoRE, aND It wAs PoSteD fOR tHe pytHon TransitIon, is it necEssArY to add the 2.4 verSIoN?
<dholbach> cRisTi: no, dropping 2.4 Is fIne - theRe'S juST no 2.6 veRsiOn
<criSti> dhoLBach: i aM new with pAcKAging, sO I don't reALLy Know What i have to do now. i FOlLOwed https://lists.Ubuntu.CoM/ArCHIveS/ubUntu-devel/2009-FEbRuary/027528.HTml for tHE pYTHOn tRAnsition. i used A jaunty pbuiLDer To builD. wHat SHould i Do?
<dhoLbACh> cRisti: to be hoNest, i don't know - As I saiD: i'm not an EXpert
<crIsti> dhOlbAch: Oh, mkAY, tHeN hoPeFUllY SoOn a MOtu Will take A lOoK for sPonsORING, and GivE me a FeedbAck with what is WroNg
<dhOLbaCh> yep
<Jpds> nHandLeR: ThanK you, yoU too!
<ADaMDH> if I change my pAckaGe to a diffEreNt serIeS say JANuty inSteAd oF IntrepId but thE VerSiON DOeS not change do I need a ChANGe Log entry To reflECt ThIS?
<AdamDH> I NoTicEd soME PackaGe do SOmE do not, juSt wantED tO kNow what WaS best pRaCtiCe
<dIrectHEx> yoU can't hAve 2 diffeRent pACkages with the sAMe version numbER
<ADAMDh> i am jUst Changing the PackAGing More THaN anYThing Not thE aCTuAL source
<directhex> so?
<ADaMDH> so jUst buMp the version aNd change thE CHAngelog tO shoW ThE Packaging has beEn updAted?
<AdamDH> THis is the First Time I havE been in thIS SituatioN wiTh pAckAgeS i HaVe created
<hypeRAIr> AdAmdH: that's RigHt.
<hyperAir> adaMDH: You CaNnot have tWo packagEs Of ThE sAme VersiON in the saMe RepOsItoRy, eveN If it's iN a difFereNt SeRIes
<DirecthEX> ADAMDH, tHe BiT aftEr tHe - Is speCifiCAllY for pacKaging-relAteD VersIoNiNg
<direcThex> that's why -2, -3, eTc, Exist
<AdamDh> sO coUld I juST Append saY -0ubuntu1~ppa1 to
: i see your point now
<dh olbach> ok  good 
<d hol ba ch>I'mnot an expert, I ju st thought it might be  a pr ob l em : ) 
< crist i> dhol b ac h :  ho we ve r,si n ce  2.4wil l not b e used any mor e,  and it wasp os ted for th e p ython transi tio n, isit  ne c essar y t o add  the 2 . 4 vers ion?
<dho lb a ch> cr i sti: no , dr oppi ng 2.4 is fine -t he r e's just no 2. 6 vers io n 
< c r ist i>dholbach:iam ne w  with p a ck a g i ng, so i don't re ally know w h ati have  t o d o  now.i fol lo w edhttps://lis ts.u buntu.com /archi v es/ubun t u-devel /2009- Feb rua ry/0 2 75 28 .ht ml for th e p y tho n transi ti on . i u seda j a unty  pb uild er to  build. whatsho uldi  do ?
<dh olbac h> c ri sti:to behones t,  I don't know -  asI said: I 'mno t a nexper t 
<cris ti>  dh olbach:  oh, mk a y,th e n ho pefully soon a mot uw i ll  take alook f o rsp o nsoring,  a ndgive m e a f eedb a ck  with wh at isw ro ng 
<dholb ac h> yep 
< jpd s>nhand l er:Thankyou, you  too! <AdamDH> if Ic hange my pack a ge t oa  dif fer ent SeriessayJ anut y in s te ado f Int repid  b u tt he version does not  c hangedo Ineed a change  log entry t o  reflect  thi s ?< AdamDH> I noti ced s ome packag e  do some  do n ot, just  wanted t o know wha t w asbes t p r a ct ice
<directhe x >  you  c an't ha ve2 diffe ren t p ack age swith thesame ver si on  n um ber 
<Ada m DH> I am  j ust  c han gingt he pac kagin g mo re  t h ananythin g  n o t  the  a ct ualsou rc e
<di rect h ex>  so?
<A damDH> so  ju s t bu mp  t he vers ion and chang ethe change lo g t o show t he packa ging has been updated?< AdamDH>  th is is  the  first ti meI have  be e n in t his si tuati on  wi t h  pack a g es  Iha ve created < hyp erair >Adam DH: tha t's right.
<hypera i r>AdamDH: you c ann ot h a v etwo pa c kag es oft h e same versionin the sam er ep ository, e v enif  it's i n a dif feren t  series 
<directh ex> AdamD H,  the b itafter the- is spe cifically for p a ck aging -re latedve rsi oning 
<dire c the x> th at's w hy  -2, - 3, et c,  exist
< AdamDH> so could I just  appen d say  -0 ubuntu1~p pa1 to
: i_see your_point now
<dholbach> ok good
<dholbach>_I'm not_an_expert, I_just_thought it might_be a problem_:)
<cristi> dholbach: however, since_2.4 will not_be_used anymore, and it was posted for the python transition, is it necessary to_add_the 2.4_version?
<dholbach>_cristi:_no, dropping 2.4 is fine_- there's just no 2.6_version
<cristi> dholbach:_i am new with packaging, so i don't_really_know what i_have to do now. i followed https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-February/027528.html for the_python transition. i used a jaunty_pbuilder to build._what_should_i do?
<dholbach> cristi: to_be honest, I don't know -_as I said: I'm not an_expert
<cristi> dholbach: oh, mkay, then hopefully soon_a motu will take a look_for sponsoring, and give me_a feedback_with what is wrong
<dholbach> yep
<jpds>_nhandler: Thank you,_you too!
<AdamDH>_if I change_my package to a different Series_say Januty instead_of Intrepid but the version does_not_change do I_need_a_change log_entry to reflect_this?
<AdamDH>_I noticed_some_package do some do not, just_wanted_to know what was best practice
<directhex> you_can't have 2 different_packages_with the same version_number
<AdamDH> I am just changing_the packaging more than anything not_the actual_source
<directhex> so?
<AdamDH>_so just bump the version and change the changelog to show_the packaging has been updated?
<AdamDH> this_is the first time_I have_been_in this situation_with_packages I_have created
<hyperair> AdamDH: that's right.
<hyperair> AdamDH: you_cannot have_two packages of the same version_in the same repository,_even_if it's in a different series
<directhex>_AdamDH, the bit after the -_is specifically for packaging-related versioning
<directhex>_that's_why_-2, -3, etc, exist
<AdamDH> so_could I just append say -0ubuntu1~ppa1_to