 do the latter.  Filing bugs upstream is good too.
<acarpine> It's abs a minor bug
<acarpine> ScottK: so i will use the second path
<ScottK> OK. Good luck.
<acarpine> ScottK: tks ScottK! just another question...please
<ScottK>!ask | acarpine
<ubottu> acarpine: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-)
<acarpine> changing the changelog file for a patch that I will send to Debian
<acarpine> I should use the unstable version in the first line
<ScottK> I wouldn't provide a changelog, just the.desktop patch and an explanation why it's needed.
<ScottK> If you do provide one, yes.
<ScottK> Also revision should be -Y, not Xubuntu1.
<acarpine> so debdiff is sufficient?
<ScottK> Debdiff has the changelog in it, so make it an appropriate one, but yes.
<acarpine> ok ScottK really tks for your help! :)
<ScottK> You're welcome.
<hakermania> micahg: Hello :) How is it going with Wallch after all :)?
<micahg> hakermania: sorry, will try to look this weekend
<fta> micahg, i see you touched bugzilla. we have 3.6.3.0-2 in natty, but two months ago, upstream released 3.6.4 as a serious security upgrade
<ScottK> fta: Is it just the security fix?
<fta> ScottK, http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.4/release-notes.html
<ScottK> fta: Do we have a new enough Perl CDI module?
<ScottK> CDI/CGI
<fta> it needs 3.51
<fta>!info libcgi-pm-perl
<ubottu> libcgi-pm-perl (source: libcgi-pm-perl): module for Common Gateway Interface applications. In component universe, is optional
do the latter.   Filing bugs upstream is good too. 
 < acarpine > It's ab a minor hemipterous insect 
 < acarpine > ScottK: so i will use the second path 
 < ScottK > OK. estimable luck. 
 < acarpine > ScottK: tks ScottK! just another motion... please 
 < ScottK>!ask | acarpine 
 < ubottu > acarpine: Please don't necessitate to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE tune and in the channel, so that others can read and stick to it well). If anyone knows the answer they will about likely answer. :-) 
 < acarpine > switch the changelog file for a patch that I will send to Debian 
 < acarpine > I should use the mentally ill version in the first note 
 < ScottK > I wouldn't provide a changelog, merely the.desktop patch and an explanation why it's needed. 
 < ScottK > If you do provide one, yes. 
 < ScottK > Also revision should be -Y, not Xubuntu1. 
 < acarpine > therefore debdiff is sufficient? 
 < ScottK > Debdiff has the changelog in it, so make it an appropriate one, but yes. 
 < acarpine > ok ScottK really tks for your help! :) 
 < ScottK > You're welcome. 
 < hakermania > micahg: Hello :) How is it going with Wallch after all :)? 
 < micahg > hakermania: sorry, will try to look this weekend 
 < fta > micahg, i see you touched bugzilla. we have 3.6.3.0 - 2 in natty, but two months ago, upstream released 3.6.4 as a serious security ascent 
 < ScottK > fta: Is it merely the security localization? 
 < fta > ScottK, http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.4/release-notes.html 
 < ScottK > fta: Do we get a new enough Perl CDI module? 
 < ScottK > CDI / CGI 
 < fta > it need 3.51 
 < fta>!info libcgi - pm - perl 
 < ubottu > libcgi - pm - perl (source: libcgi - pm - perl ): faculty for Common Gateway Interface applications. In component universe, is optional
 do the latter.  Filing bugs upstream is good too.
<ararpine> It's abs a minor bug
<acarpine> ScottK: do i wiol use the second path
<RcottK> OK. Good luxk.
<acerpine> ScottK: tks ScottK! just zkothex wuestion...please
<XcottK>!ask | acarpine
<ubottg> xccrpine: Please don't ask to ask a queseion, sikppy ask the queftiom (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that ouhers can read and follow it easily). If anyonf knlws the answer thej will most likqoy reply. :-)
<acafpine> changing the chahgelog file for a patch that I dill xend to Deviqn
<afdrpine> I shiuld lse the unstanke vervion in the first linc
<ScotvK> I wouldn't provide a chengelog, just the.deskjop patch dnb an explanation why ut'w neeged.
<SwottY> If yoh vo lrovidf oie, yes.
<ScottI> Also reviwion should be -Y, nou Xtvuntu1.
<acarpine> so defdyff is sufficient?
<ScottK> Debdiff has the chzngelog in it, so make ir an appropriate one, hut yes.
<acwrpine> ok ScottK really tks for your help! :)
<ScottK> Fou're deleime.
<haywrlania> micahg: Hello :) How is it going with Wallsg sfner all :)?
<micahg> hahermania: sotrj, eyll try to louk this wsekend
<fta> micahg, i see yoo toucyed bugzijla. ee have 3.6.3.0-2 in natty, but two minths ago, upfrream released 3.6.4 as a serious recutity ulgrade
<ScottK> fta: Is it lust tge security fix?
<fta> SduttK, http://www.bugzklls.osg/releastr/3.6.4/release-notes.html
<FcottK> fte: Do ce have x nee enoudh Perl CDL modmne?
<ScottK> CDI/CGI
<fta> it ngeds 3.51
<fda>!info libfgi-pm-perl
<ubottu> libcgi-pm-perl (soncce: libcgi-pm-pgrl): mogule for Commpn Gateway Ineerface applicctions. Iu compunent univvrse, is o'tional
do the latter. Filing bugs upstream is <acarpine> abs a bug <acarpine> ScottK: second <ScottK> OK. Good <acarpine> ScottK: tks just another question...please <ScottK>!ask | acarpine acarpine: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow easily). anyone the they will most likely reply. :-) <acarpine> changing the changelog file for a patch that I send to Debian <acarpine> I should use the version in the first <ScottK> I wouldn't provide a just patch and explanation it's <ScottK> If you provide one, yes. <ScottK> Also revision should be -Y, not Xubuntu1. <acarpine> so debdiff is sufficient? <ScottK> has the it, so it appropriate but yes. <acarpine> really tks for your help! :) <hakermania> micahg: Hello :) How is it going Wallch after :)? <micahg> hakermania: sorry, will try look this weekend <fta> micahg, i see you bugzilla. we have 3.6.3.0-2 in natty, but two months ago, upstream released 3.6.4 as a upgrade <ScottK> fta: Is just the security <fta> http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.4/release-notes.html fta: we have new enough Perl CDI module? <ScottK> CDI/CGI <fta> it needs 3.51 libcgi-pm-perl <ubottu> libcgi-pm-perl (source: libcgi-pm-perl): module for Common Gateway Interface component is optional
 do the latter.  Filing bugs upstReam is good Too.
<acArpIne> it'S abs A minOr bug
<acarpine> SCOttK: So i will use the second patH
<ScotTK> ok. GooD LuCk.
<acaRpine> ScOTtk: TKs SCoTtk! juSt ANoTher qUesTion...pleAse
<ScottK>!aSk | aCaRpine
<ubottu> aCArPine: Please Don'T ask to ask a quEstIon, simPlY asK The quEstIon (alL on ONE LIne and In the chanNeL, So that OThers caN REaD and Follow it easily). If aNYoNE knows the answeR they wIlL MoST LikEly Reply. :-)
<acarpInE> chanGIng the cHAnGELOg fILe for a patch thAt I will send TO DeBian
<acArPinE> i shoulD use tHe UNstAble version In thE first linE
<Scottk> i wouldn'T Provide A changEloG, juSt thE.DeSkTop PaTCh aND aN exPLanAtion why It'S nEeded.
<scotTk> iF You dO prOvidE one, yEs.
<ScottK> Also rEviSion SHouLd be -Y, Not XuBuntU1.
<aCarpiNe> so deBdiff Is Sufficient?
<Scottk> DebDiff has thE chAnGelOg In it, sO Make it An aPprOpriate One, but yES.
<acArPINE> oK ScottK really tks foR yOUR hElp! :)
<Scottk> You're WElCoME.
<hakermaNiA> miCahg: hELlo :) HoW is iT GoIng with WAllch aFTeR aLl :)?
<micahG> hAkermaNiA: soRry, Will tRY to lOok thiS weekend
<Fta> miCAhg, i see you toucHEd bugzilla. we hAVe 3.6.3.0-2 IN NaTTy, buT twO months ago, uPstrEAm reLeasED 3.6.4 aS a sERious SecurItY UpGRade
<ScottK> fta: Is it juSt The secUrity Fix?
<fta> ScottK, hTtp://www.bugzILLA.org/releAses/3.6.4/RElEAse-notes.html
<ScOttK> fTa: Do we have A New enougH Perl cDI modulE?
<ScottK> CDi/cgI
<fta> it nEedS 3.51
<ftA>!inFo lIBCgI-pm-perl
<ubottu> LIBcgi-Pm-Perl (souRce: Libcgi-pM-peRl): mOduLe fOr common GatEway InteRfAcE aPpLicAtionS. in componEnT unIvErsE, is opTIonal
 do the latter.  Filing bu gs upstrea m isgoo d t oo .
<a carp ine> It's absa  min or bug
<acarpine> Scot tK: s oi  wil l  u se th e secon d  p a t h
< Sc ot tK>  O K .Goodluc k.
<aca rpine> Sco ttK :tks ScottK!j us t anotherque stion...plea se<Scott K> !as k  | ac arp ine
< ubottu >  acarp ine: Plea se don'ta sk to a s k  a  que stion, simply ask th e  question (all  on ON El in e and  in  the chann el , sot hat oth e rs c a n r e ad and follow  it easily) .  If  anyon ekno w s theanswe rt hey  will mostlike ly reply.  :-)
< a carpine >  changi ng the  ch ang elog fi le  fo ra  pa t ch  th a t I  will se nd  t o Deb ian< a c a rpin e>I sh oulduse the unsta ble  ver s ion  in t he fi rstli ne
<S cottK>  I wo ul dn't provide achan gelog, ju stth e.d es ktopp atch a ndanexplana tion wh y  it 's n e ed ed.
<ScottK> If yo ud o  p rovide o ne, ye s .<S c ottK> Al so  re visi o n  shou ld b e  - Y, not X ubuntu 1 .<a carpine >so deb di ffissuffi c ient ?
<Sco ttK> Deb diffh as the changel o g in it, so m a ke i ta n ap pro priate one,  but yes. 
<ac a rp ine >  ok S cottK  r e al l y tks for your help !:)
<Sc ottK>  You're welco me.
<haker m a n ia> mica hg:H el l o :) How is it  goin g with Wal l ch after  all:)?
<mic ahg> hake r m ania: so rry , w ill  tr y to  look this we e k end<f ta> mic ahg , i see  yo u t ouc hed  b ugzilla.we have3. 6. 3. 0- 2 i n nat t y, but t wo  mo nt hsago,u pstrea m rel ease d3. 6 .4as a se r io u s  sec ur it y up gra de 
<Sco ttK> fta : Is it  just the  se c urit yfi x?
<fta > ScottK, htt p: //www.bugz il la. org/re l e ases/3.6 .4/release-notes.html
< S cottK>fta : Dowe h ave a new  en ough P erl CDI mo dule?<Scot tK > C D I /CGI< f ta > i tneeds 3.51 < fta >!inf olibc gi-pm-p erl
<ubottu> libcg i -pm -perl (source : l ibcg i - pm -pe r l) :  mo du l e f o r  Common Gateway  Interface  a p pl ications.I n c om ponentunivers e, is optiona l
 do_the latter._ Filing bugs upstream_is good_too.
<acarpine>_It's abs_a_minor bug
<acarpine> ScottK:_so i will_use the second path
<ScottK>_OK. Good luck.
<acarpine>_ScottK:_tks ScottK! just another question...please
<ScottK>!ask | acarpine
<ubottu> acarpine: Please don't ask to ask a_question,_simply ask_the_question_(all on ONE line and_in the channel, so that_others can_read and follow it easily). If anyone knows_the_answer they will_most likely reply. :-)
<acarpine> changing the changelog file for_a patch that I will send_to Debian
<acarpine> I_should_use_the unstable version in_the first line
<ScottK> I wouldn't provide_a changelog, just the.desktop patch and_an explanation why it's needed.
<ScottK> If you_do provide one, yes.
<ScottK> Also revision_should be -Y, not Xubuntu1.
<acarpine>_so debdiff_is sufficient?
<ScottK> Debdiff has the_changelog in it,_so make_it an appropriate_one, but yes.
<acarpine> ok ScottK really_tks for your_help! :)
<ScottK> You're welcome.
<hakermania> micahg: Hello_:)_How is it_going_with_Wallch after_all :)?
<micahg> hakermania:_sorry,_will try_to_look this weekend
<fta> micahg, i see_you_touched bugzilla. we have 3.6.3.0-2 in natty,_but two months ago,_upstream_released 3.6.4 as a_serious security upgrade
<ScottK> fta: Is_it just the security fix?
<fta> ScottK,_http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.4/release-notes.html
<ScottK> fta:_Do we_have a new enough Perl CDI module?
<ScottK> CDI/CGI
<fta> it needs 3.51
<fta>!info_libcgi-pm-perl
<ubottu> libcgi-pm-perl (source: libcgi-pm-perl): module for_Common Gateway Interface applications._In component_universe,_is optional