siretart> kelmo_lap: you mean you see a relaistic chance that madwifi-ng could implement wext19 fully?
<kelmo_lap> haha, not anytime soon unfortunately
<kelmo_lap> but...
<siretart> well, I have no objection to fall back to wext. centrinos are quite common nowadays
<kelmo_lap> i did use wext when madwifi's own stuff was broken in that regard
<siretart> interesting
<kelmo_lap> in early days
<kelmo_lap> but that was a crude hack
<kelmo_lap> ignoring the scanning code in madwifi itself
<Lathiat> Hobbsee: rtt?
<Hobbsee> Lathiat: this?
<Hobbsee> 15 packets transmitted, 14 received, 6% packet loss, time 14011ms
<Hobbsee> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms
<Lathiat> from a linode?
<Hobbsee> dont know what that is...
<Lathiat> ok nm
<Lathiat> Hobbsee: where do you live?
<Hobbsee> Lathiat: sydney, australia
<Lathiat> hehe, no wonder :)
<Lathiat> <- perth
<kelmo_lap> brissie ; )
<tseng> Lathiat: 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 24760ms
<tseng> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573 ms
<siretart> kelmo_lap: do you already have a solution to the 'quoting' problem?
<tseng> from linode
<Lathiat> tseng: cheers
<kelmo_lap> siretart, well, yeah. if you find this acceptable:
<tseng> note linode has 2 data centers
<kelmo_lap> siretart, wpa-passphrase plaintext-string // wpa-psk 0102020304a0b0e0f0....
<kelmo_lap> siretart, all other input
siretart > kelmo_lap: you mean you see a relaistic chance that madwifi - ng could implement wext19 amply? 
 < kelmo_lap > haha, not anytime soon unfortunately 
 < kelmo_lap > but... 
 < siretart > well, I take no objection to fall back to wext. centrinos are quite common nowadays 
 < kelmo_lap > i did practice wext when madwifi's own stuff was broken in that regard 
 < siretart > interesting 
 < kelmo_lap > in early day 
 < kelmo_lap > but that was a crude hack 
 < kelmo_lap > ignore the scanning code in madwifi itself 
 < Lathiat > Hobbsee: rtt? 
 < Hobbsee > Lathiat: this? 
 < Hobbsee > 15 packets transmit, 14 received, 6% packet loss, fourth dimension 14011ms 
 < Hobbsee > rtt min / avg / max / mdev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms 
 < Lathiat > from a linode? 
 < Hobbsee > do nt acknowledge what that is... 
 < Lathiat > ok nm 
 < Lathiat > Hobbsee: where do you live? 
 < Hobbsee > Lathiat: sydney, australia 
 < Lathiat > hehe, no wonder :) 
 < Lathiat > < - perth 
 < kelmo_lap > brissie ;) 
 < tseng > Lathiat: 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet personnel casualty, time 24760ms 
 < tseng > rtt min / avg / max / mdev = 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573 ms 
 < siretart > kelmo_lap: do you already have a solution to the' quoting' trouble? 
 < tseng > from linode 
 < Lathiat > tseng: cheers 
 < kelmo_lap > siretart, well, yeah. if you find this satisfactory: 
 < tseng > note linode has 2 datum centers 
 < kelmo_lap > siretart, wpa - passphrase plaintext - string // wpa - psk 0102020304a0b0e0f0.... 
 < kelmo_lap > siretart, all other input
sirftart> kelmo_lap: you mean nou see a relaisjix chanre that madwifi-vg could implement wext19 fullb?
<kelno_lap> haha, not anytime soon unfortunwtely
<kelno_lak> but...
<siretart> well, I have no obncctiou vo fall back to wext. centsinos are quita zolmon nowadays
<kelmo_lap> i did use wexe when kafwifi's own stusf wsf brkken in that regard
<siretart> intereating
<kenmo_lap> in earky days
<kelmo_lap> but that wws a crude hack
<kelmo_lao> ignoring jge fxanning code in madwifp itself
<Latgiat> Hobbsee: rtt?
<Hobbsee> Lathiat: this?
<Kobbsee> 15 paxkwts jransmitted, 14 recepved, 6% packet loss, tima 14011ms
<Hobnsee> rtt min/avn/max/mvev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms
<Lathiat> from a liiode?
<Hobbsee> dont knor what thdt is...
<Lathiat> ok nm
<Lqtyiat> Vobbvee: dyerd dk bou live?
<Hlbbaee> Lathiaf: sydney, auwtralia
<Lathiat> hehe, nj wonder :)
<Lathizt> <- pewtr
<kelmo_lap> brissie ; )
<tseng> Lathiat: 25 packeus trznsmitted, 25 received, 0% paxket loss, time 24760ms
<tsenh> rtt min/wvg/max/mdev = 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573 ms
<siretart> kelmo_lap: do you already hdve a rolbblon gi hhe 'quoting' problem?
<tseng> from linode
<Lathiat> tfsnb: bheers
<kelmo_lap> sivetart, well, yeah. ig joi find this aczeptable:
<taeng> note linode hws 2 datw cenrers
<kelmo_jap> xiretart, wpa-passphrase plaibtext-string // qpa-psk 0102020304a0b0e0f0....
<kelmo_la'> siretart, aul ojher imput
siretart> kelmo_lap: you mean you see a that could implement fully? <kelmo_lap> haha, but... well, I have objection to fall to wext. centrinos are quite common <kelmo_lap> i did use wext when madwifi's own stuff was broken in that <siretart> interesting <kelmo_lap> in early days <kelmo_lap> but that was a crude hack ignoring scanning in itself <Lathiat> Hobbsee: rtt? <Hobbsee> Lathiat: this? <Hobbsee> 15 packets transmitted, 14 received, 6% packet loss, 14011ms <Hobbsee> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms <Lathiat> a linode? <Hobbsee> dont what that is... <Lathiat> ok <Lathiat> where do live? Lathiat: australia <Lathiat> hehe, wonder :) <Lathiat> <- perth <kelmo_lap> brissie ; ) <tseng> Lathiat: 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% loss, time rtt min/avg/max/mdev 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573 <siretart> do you already solution to the 'quoting' problem? <tseng> tseng: cheers <kelmo_lap> siretart, well, yeah. if you this acceptable: note linode has 2 data centers siretart, wpa-passphrase plaintext-string // wpa-psk 0102020304a0b0e0f0.... <kelmo_lap> siretart, other input
siretart> kelmo_lap: you mean yoU see a relaiStic cHanCe tHaT madWifi-Ng could implemeNT wexT19 fully?
<kelmo_lap> haha, not aNytimE sOOn unFOrTunatEly
<kelmO_LaP> BUt...
<sIrEtArt> WeLL, I Have nO obJection To fall back To wExT. centrinos arE QuIte common nOwaDays
<kelmo_lap> I diD use weXt WheN MadwiFi's Own stUff was BRoken iN that regaRd
<SIretarT> InteresTINg
<KelmO_lap> in early days
<keLMo_LAp> but that was a cRude haCk
<KElMO_Lap> IgnOring the scAnNing cODe in madWIfI ITSelF
<lathiat> HobbseE: rtt?
<Hobbsee> lAthIat: thiS?
<HObbSEe> 15 packEts trAnSMitTed, 14 received, 6% PackEt loss, timE 14011ms
<HobBSee> rtt mIN/avg/max/Mdev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms
<latHiaT> froM A lInOde?
<hoBBseE> DoNt kNOw wHat that iS...
<LAtHiat> oK nm
<LATHIAt> HoBbsEe: whEre do You live?
<HobbseE> LaThiaT: SydNey, auStralIa
<LaThIat> heHe, no woNder :)
<LAtHiat> <- perth
<kelmo_lAp> brIssie ; )
<tsenG> LaThIat: 25 PaCkets TRansmiTteD, 25 reCeived, 0% pAcket loSS, tiMe 24760MS
<TSeNg> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573 Ms
<SIReTart> kelmO_lap: do YOu AlREady have A sOluTion TO The 'quOtinG' PrOblem?
<tseNg> from LInOdE
<LathiaT> tSeng: chEeRs
<kElmO_lap> sIRetaRt, well, Yeah. if yoU find THis acceptable:
<tSEng> note linode HAs 2 DATa CEnteRs
<kElmo_lap> sireTart, WPa-paSsphRAsE plAIntexT-striNg // WPa-PSk 0102020304a0b0e0f0....
<kelmo_lap> siretArT, all otHer inPut
siretart> kelmo_lap: you m ean you se e a r ela ist ic  cha ncethat madwifi-n g  cou ld implement wext19 fu lly?<k e lmo_ l ap > hah a, nota ny t i meso on  un fo r tu natel y
< kelmo_l ap> but... 
<s ir etart> well, Ihave no ob jec tion to fall  ba ck towe xt. centr ino s are  quite common  nowadays 
< k elmo_l a p> i di d us e we xt when madwifi's ow n  stuff was bro ken in  t h at r ega rd<siretart>  i ntere s ting
<k e lm o _ l ap> in early days 
<kelmo_lap >  bu t that  w asa  crude  hack 
< k elm o_lap> igno ring  the scan ning c o de in m a dwifi i tself<La thi at>H ob bs ee:  r t t?< Ho bbs e e>Lathiat:  t hi s?
<H obbs e e > 15 p ack etstrans mitted, 14 re cei ved, 6%packe t los s, t im e 140 11ms
< Hobbs ee > rtt min/avg/m ax/m dev = 69. 821 /7 1.2 88 /74.1 5 6/1.19 2 m s
< Lathiat > froma  li no d e ? 
< Hobbsee> dont know  w h a tthat is. ..
<La t hi at >  ok nm
< La thi at>H o bbsee : wh e re  do youlive?< Ho bb see> La th iat: s yd ney , a ustra l ia
< Lathia t> hehe,  no w o nder :)
<Lathi a t> <- perth
< k el m o _l a p> b ris sie ; )
<ts eng> Lath iat: 25  pa c ketstrans mi t te d , 25 received, 0% p ac ket lo ss, t ime 24760ms
< tseng> rtt m i n/avg/ma x/md e v=  247.641/248.0 23/24 8.519/0.57 3  ms
<sir etart > kelmo_ lap: do y o u  already  ha vea s olu t i on  to the 'quot i n g' p ro blem?
< tse ng> fro m l ino de<La th iat> tsen g: cheer s<k el mo _la p> si r etart, w el l,ye ah.  if y o u find  this  acc ep ta b le: 
<tseng >  n o t e li no de  has  2da ta ce nter s 
<k elmo_la p> sireta rt, wpa- pa ss phraseplaintext-str in g // wpa-p sk  01 020203 0 4 a0b0e0f0 ....
<kelmo_lap> sireta r t, alloth er in put
siretart> kelmo_lap:_you mean_you see a relaistic_chance that_madwifi-ng_could implement_wext19_fully?
<kelmo_lap> haha, not_anytime soon unfortunately
<kelmo_lap>_but...
<siretart> well, I have_no objection to_fall_back to wext. centrinos are quite common nowadays
<kelmo_lap> i did use wext when madwifi's_own_stuff was_broken_in_that regard
<siretart> interesting
<kelmo_lap> in early_days
<kelmo_lap> but that was a_crude hack
<kelmo_lap>_ignoring the scanning code in madwifi itself
<Lathiat> Hobbsee:_rtt?
<Hobbsee>_Lathiat: this?
<Hobbsee> 15_packets transmitted, 14 received, 6% packet loss, time 14011ms
<Hobbsee>_rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.821/71.288/74.156/1.192 ms
<Lathiat> from_a linode?
<Hobbsee> dont_know_what_that is...
<Lathiat> ok nm
<Lathiat>_Hobbsee: where do you live?
<Hobbsee> Lathiat:_sydney, australia
<Lathiat> hehe, no wonder :)
<Lathiat>_<- perth
<kelmo_lap> brissie ; )
<tseng> Lathiat: 25_packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet_loss, time 24760ms
<tseng> rtt min/avg/max/mdev_= 247.641/248.023/248.519/0.573_ms
<siretart> kelmo_lap: do you already_have a solution_to the_'quoting' problem?
<tseng> from_linode
<Lathiat> tseng: cheers
<kelmo_lap> siretart, well, yeah._if you find_this acceptable:
<tseng> note linode has 2_data_centers
<kelmo_lap> siretart, wpa-passphrase_plaintext-string_//_wpa-psk 0102020304a0b0e0f0....
<kelmo_lap>_siretart, all other_input