 of a changelog is:
<PMantis> hello (2.1.1-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
<PMantis> Will it work on debian? *I* know the package will work, but will it install?
<PMantis> errr
<PMantis> I mean, will it work on dapper
<superm1_> that is used for controlling which version its built against
<superm1_> you can still manually build it in a dapper pbuilder or similar
<superm1_> and run it there
 * PMantis tilts his head like a dog
<superm1_> so in short, 'yes' it will install
<soren> PMantis: If the binary package is built on hardy, it'll most likely state a dependency on a more recent libc version that is available in Dapper.
<superm1_> soren, it is a script that likely won't be depending on libc
<superm1_> from what i've understood from what he said so far
<soren> superm1_: hello is a script?
<soren> Since when?
<PMantis> soren: You're a little out of the loop from my "odd" non-compiled package. :)
<PMantis> soren: No, that was a copy/paste from the example I'm looking at.
<PMantis> my package is(will be) of a bash script
<soren> Right, and for that example, my answer is correct :)
<PMantis> heh
<superm1_> :)
<soren> PMantis: For a bash script, you won't have any problems of that kind.
<PMantis> cool
<PMantis> Oooooh, debuild got much further this time...
<PMantis> I think my rules file needs tweaking:
<PMantis> make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
<superm1_> PMantis, that example rules file that was in my package doesn't use a Makefile at all.
<PMantis> Yeah, there's no Makefile... but debuilder still want to run make
<PMantis> I commented that out in rules - got further.
<superm1_> PMantis, i'm saying in ipod-convenience's debian
of a changelog is: 
 < PMantis > hello (2.1.1 - 0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency = low 
 < PMantis > Will it work on debian? * I * acknowledge the software will work, but will it install? 
 < PMantis > errr 
 < PMantis > I mean, will it make on dapper 
 < superm1 _ > that is use for controlling which version its built against 
 < superm1 _ > you can even manually build up it in a dapper pbuilder or similar 
 < superm1 _ > and run it there 
  * PMantis tilts his head like a pawl 
 < superm1 _ > so in short,' yes' it will install 
 < soren > PMantis: If the binary software is built on hardy, it'll most likely state a dependency on a more recent libc adaptation that is available in Dapper. 
 < superm1 _ > soren, it is a script that likely won't be depending on libc 
 < superm1 _ > from what i've understand from what he said so far 
 < soren > superm1 _: hello is a script? 
 < soren > Since when? 
 < PMantis > soren: You're a little out of the cringle from my " odd " non - compiled package. :) 
 < PMantis > soren: No, that was a copy / paste from the example I'm look at. 
 < PMantis > my package is(will be) of a bash script 
 < soren > Right, and for that example, my answer is right :) 
 < PMantis > heh 
 < superm1 _ > :) 
 < soren > PMantis: For a knock handwriting, you won't have any problems of that kind. 
 < PMantis > cool 
 < PMantis > Oooooh, debuild got much further this time... 
 < PMantis > I think my rule file necessitate tweaking: 
 < PMantis > make[1 ]: * * * No target specify and no makefile found.   Stop. 
 < superm1 _ > PMantis, that example rules file that was in my package doesn't use a Makefile at wholly. 
 < PMantis > Yeah, there's no Makefile... but debuilder still want to run make 
 < PMantis > I commented that out in rules - got further. 
 < superm1 _ > PMantis, i'm saying in ipod - convenience's debian
 of a changelog is:
<PMantis> htllo (2.1.1-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgencb=low
<PMahtis> Wilu it work on debian? *I* know tie pqckagt will work, but wilu it instwll?
<PMantus> ecrr
<PMantis> I meai, will ib wori on ba'per
<superm1_> that is used fmr controlling wfieh version its built against
<superm1_> yju can xtlll manually boild pt in z dapper pbuilder or similar
<superm1_> and rui it there
 * PMamtis tilts his head like a dog
<duperm1_> so in short, 'yes' it wilo infrall
<soren> PMxntis: If the binary padkage is built on hardy, it'll mort lilely state a deogndency on a more recent libc version that ix available in Da'per.
<wuperm1_> soren, it is a vcript that likely won't be ge'ending on libc
<superm1_> feom wvat h've jbdefstkov fdom whwt ie said so rar
<soren> superm1_: hello is a scrope?
<woren> Since wgen?
<PMagtys> soren: You're a little out of the loop frkm my "odd" non-compiled pqckage. :)
<PMantis> soren: Jo, that wws a copy/paste from the example I'm looking at.
<PMandis> mb oacjane ir(qipl be) of a bash script
<soren> Right, and for thae ecakple, my answer is correct :)
<PLamjis> heh
<superm1_> :)
<roren> 'Jahtis: For a bash scgipt, yoo won't have any pronlems of that kind.
<PMantis> ciol
<PMantis> Ojiooh, debuild got mbch further chis tome...
<PMsntis> I think my rules yile nseds tweakijg:
<PMantis> oake[1]: *** No targets spvcifhed and no makefile found.  Stop.
<supecm1_> PMcntis, thxt ecample rules filf thab was in my package doesu't usa a Makefipe at all.
<PMantis> Yeah, there's no Makefile... but cetuinder stijl wakt to run make
<PIantis> I commeuted thac out kn rules - fot furvher.
<superm1_> PIantis, i'm sayhjg in ipod-coivenience'f devian
of a changelog is: <PMantis> hello (2.1.1-0ubuntu1) <PMantis> it work debian? *I* know will install? <PMantis> errr I mean, will work on dapper <superm1_> that is for controlling which version its built against <superm1_> you can still manually build in a dapper pbuilder or similar <superm1_> and run it there * PMantis his like dog so in short, 'yes' it will install <soren> PMantis: If the binary package is built on it'll most likely state a dependency on a recent libc version that available in Dapper. <superm1_> soren, is script that won't depending libc <superm1_> from i've understood from what he said so far <soren> superm1_: hello is a script? <soren> Since when? soren: You're out of loop my non-compiled package. :) No, that was a copy/paste from looking at. <PMantis> my package is(will be) of bash script Right, and for that example, my is correct :) <PMantis> heh <superm1_> :) <soren> For a bash script, you won't have any problems of that kind. <PMantis> cool <PMantis> got much further this <PMantis> I think rules needs <PMantis> *** No specified and no makefile found. Stop. <superm1_> PMantis, that example rules that was in my package doesn't use a Makefile at Yeah, no Makefile... but still want to run <PMantis> commented that out in got <superm1_> in debian
 of a changelog is:
<PMantis> hellO (2.1.1-0ubuntu1) harDy; urgEncY=loW
<PmantIs> WiLl it work on debiAN? *I* knOw the package will work, buT will It INstaLL?
<PmantiS> errr
<PMANtIS> i meAn, WiLl iT wORk On dapPer
<Superm1_> tHat is used fOr cOnTrolling whicH VeRsion its buIlt Against
<superM1_> yoU can stIlL maNUally BuiLd it iN a dappER pbuilDer or simiLaR
<Superm1_> ANd run it THErE
 * PMaNtis tilts his head lIKe A Dog
<superm1_> so in sHort, 'yeS' iT WiLL InsTalL
<soren> PManTiS: If thE Binary pACkAGE Is bUIlt on hardy, it'lL most likely STatE a depeNdEncY On a morE receNt LIbc Version that Is avAilable in dapper.
<SUperm1_> soREn, it is a Script ThaT liKely WOn'T bE dePeNDinG On LibC
<SupErm1_> from wHaT i'Ve undErstOOD FRom wHat He saId so fAr
<soren> superm1_: HelLo is A ScrIpt?
<soRen> SiNce wHeN?
<PManTis> sorEn: You'Re A little out of the Loop From my "odd" Non-CoMpiLeD packAGe. :)
<PManTis> SorEn: No, thaT was a coPY/paStE FROm The example I'm lookinG aT.
<pmaNtis> my paCkage iS(WiLl BE) of a bash ScRipT
<sorEN> right, And fOR tHat exampLe, my anSWeR iS correcT :)
<Pmantis> HeH
<suPerM1_> :)
<soreN> pManTis: For A bash scrIpt, yoU Won't have any proBLems of that kinD.
<pMANTiS> Cool
<pMaNtis> Oooooh, dEbuiLD got Much FUrTheR This tIme...
<PMAnTIs> i Think my rules file neeDs TweakiNg:
<PMaNtis> make[1]: *** No tarGets specifIED And no makEfilE FoUNd.  Stop.
<superm1_> PMAntis, That examplE Rules filE that Was in my pAckage doeSN'T use a MakEfiLe aT alL.
<PMANTiS> Yeah, there's no mAKefiLe... But debuIldEr still WanT to Run MakE
<Pmantis> I coMmented tHaT oUt In RulEs - got FUrther.
<suPeRm1_> PmaNtiS, i'm saYIng in iPod-coNvenIeNcE'S deBian
 of a changelog is:
<PMant is> hello(2.1. 1-0 ubu nt u1)hard y; urgency=low <PMa ntis> Will it work ondebia n? *I*k no w the  packag e  w i l l w or k,  bu tw il l itins tall?
< PMantis> e rrr 
< PMantis> I m e an , will itwor k on dapper<su perm1_ >tha t  is u sed  forcontro l ling w hich vers io n  its b u ilt aga i n st 
<su perm1_> you can s t il l  manually buil d it i na  d a p per  pb uilder orsi milar <superm 1 _> a n d r u n it there
 *  PMantis ti l tshis he ad  li k e a do g
<su pe r m1_ > so in sho rt,'yes' itwill i n stall
< s oren> P Mantis : I f t he b i na ry  pa ck a gei sbui l t o n hardy,  i t' ll mo st l i k e l y st ate  a d epend ency on a mor e r ecen t  li bc ve rsion  tha tis av ailabl e inDa pper.
<superm1_ > so ren, it i s a  s cri pt  that likely  wo n't  be dep endingo n l ib c < su perm1_> from whati' v e  u nderstoo d from wh at he saidso  fa r
<s o r en> s uper m 1_ : hellois a s c ri pt ?
<sore n>  Since  w hen ?
< PMant i s> s oren:You're a  litt l e out of the l o op from my "o d d" n on - comp ile d package.:)
< P Mant is>s or en: No, t hat w as ac opy/paste from theex ampleI'm l ooking at.
<P Mantis> my p a ckage is (wil l  b e ) of a bash sc ript<soren> Ri g ht, andfor t hat exam ple, my a n s wer is c orr ect  :) 
<P M a nt is> heh
<supe r m 1_>:) 
<soren > P Mantis:  Fo r a  ba shsc ript, you  won't h av ean ypro blems of thatki nd. 
< PMa ntis> cool
< PMant is>Oo oo o h,debuild go t much  f ur ther  th is  time ...< PMa ntis> I  think my  ru l es f il eneeds t weaking:
<PMa nt is> make[1 ]:  ** * No t a r gets spe cified and no makefilef ound. Sto p.
<s uper m1_> PMan tis , that  ex a mple r ules f ile t ha t w a s  in m y pa cka ge  doesn't u s e  aMakef il e at  all.
< PMantis> Yeah, the r e's  no Makefile. ..butd e bu ild e rs til lw ant t o run make
<PMa ntis> I co mm e nt ed that ou t  in  r ules -got fur ther. <superm 1_> PMant is, i'm s ay ingi n  ip od-conveni ence's d ebian
 of_a changelog_is:
<PMantis> hello (2.1.1-0ubuntu1) hardy;_urgency=low
<PMantis> Will_it_work on_debian?_*I* know the_package will work,_but will it install?
<PMantis>_errr
<PMantis> I mean,_will_it work on dapper
<superm1_> that is used for controlling which version its built against
<superm1_>_you_can still_manually_build_it in a dapper pbuilder_or similar
<superm1_> and run it_there
 *_PMantis tilts his head like a dog
<superm1_> so_in_short, 'yes' it_will install
<soren> PMantis: If the binary package is built_on hardy, it'll most likely state_a dependency on_a_more_recent libc version that_is available in Dapper.
<superm1_> soren, it_is a script that likely won't_be depending on libc
<superm1_> from what i've_understood from what he said so_far
<soren> superm1_: hello is a_script?
<soren> Since_when?
<PMantis> soren: You're a little_out of the_loop from_my "odd" non-compiled_package. :)
<PMantis> soren: No, that was_a copy/paste from_the example I'm looking at.
<PMantis> my_package_is(will be) of_a_bash_script
<soren> Right,_and for that_example,_my answer_is_correct :)
<PMantis> heh
<superm1_> :)
<soren> PMantis: For_a_bash script, you won't have any problems_of that kind.
<PMantis> cool
<PMantis>_Oooooh,_debuild got much further_this time...
<PMantis> I think my_rules file needs tweaking:
<PMantis> make[1]: ***_No targets_specified and_no makefile found.  Stop.
<superm1_> PMantis, that example rules file that_was in my package doesn't use_a Makefile at all.
<PMantis>_Yeah, there's_no_Makefile... but debuilder_still_want to_run make
<PMantis> I commented that out in_rules -_got further.
<superm1_> PMantis, i'm saying in_ipod-convenience's debian