 so we can track some items that require attention there
<kelmo_lap> siretart, so please add some items that require work there, if you like
<freeflying> azeem: also we shall remove config.guess and config.sub
<azeem> freeflying: I don't the context of that
<azeem> better ask the whole channel, somebody else might know better
<siretart> kelmo_lap: great idea
<freeflying> siretart:  shall we remove config.guess and config.sub from package
<TMM> hey, odd question: is it possible to run ubuntu 32bit with the amd64 kernel?
<Ubugtu> ubuntu bug 32 in 3270 "3270: 5250 emulation code, all rights reserved" [Normal,Resolved: notwarty]  http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=32
<TMM> 32bit kernel b0rks on the agp bus of a friends computer, but, his @#$@#$ lexmark drivers won't run in amd64
<TMM> also, he likes to play return to castle wolfenstein
<TMM> the alternative would be to run cups in a chroot...
<siretart> freeflying: yes, its a good idea to clean them in the 'clean' target of debian/rules
<freeflying> siretart: thx
<ejofee> i've just heard that ubuntu wants to adopt lindows' click'n'run. if this happens, then how will it avoid breaking some of the strong promises made by ubuntu, that (approx) "there will never be an extra price for a commercial version"?
<hub> ejofee: heard where?
<ejofee> every
<ejofee> (where)
<hub> url?
<ejofee> hub: wait
<ejofee> hub: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7474779842.html
<ejofee> hub: linspire is actually lindows
<ejofee> hub: if that happens, do you think it won't mean breaking that promise?
<hub> I classify that as "speculation"
<ejofee> hub: wow, that'd be
so we can track some items that require attention there 
 < kelmo_lap > siretart, therefore please lend some items that require work there, if you wish 
 < freeflying > azeem: also we shall remove config.guess and config.sub 
 < azeem > freeflying: I don't the context of that 
 < azeem > better necessitate the hale channel, somebody else might know better 
 < siretart > kelmo_lap: great theme 
 < freeflying > siretart:   shall we remove config.guess and config.sub from package 
 < TMM > hey, curious question: is it possible to run ubuntu 32bit with the amd64 kernel? 
 < Ubugtu > ubuntu bug 32 in 3270 " 3270: 5250 emulation code, all rights reserve " [ Normal, Resolved: notwarty ]   http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=32 
 < TMM > 32bit kernel b0rks on the agp bus of a friends calculator, but, his @#$@#$ lexmark drivers won't run in amd64 
 < TMM > besides, he likes to act return to castle wolfenstein 
 < TMM > the alternative would be to run cups in a chroot... 
 < siretart > freeflying: yes, its a good theme to clean them in the' clean' target of debian / rules 
 < freeflying > siretart: thx 
 < ejofee > i've just heard that ubuntu wants to adopt lindows' click'n'run. if this happens, then how will it avoid breaking some of the strong promises made by ubuntu, that (approx) " there will never be an extra price for a commercial version "? 
 < hub > ejofee: hear where? 
 < ejofee > every 
 < ejofee > (where) 
 < hub > url? 
 < ejofee > hub: wait 
 < ejofee > hub: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7474779842.html 
 < ejofee > hub: linspire is actually lindows 
 < ejofee > hub: if that happens, do you intend it won't think of breaking that promise? 
 < hub > I classify that as " speculation " 
 < ejofee > hub: wow, that'd be
 so we can track some items that require ajtwntion there
<ielmo_lap> siretart, so please add some irems ukat require work thefe, if you like
<frewflymng> azeem: also wx shall vzmove gonfiy.gness and config.xub
<azeem> fseeflying: I dot't tke context of that
<azeem> better ask tre wholr fhannel, someboqy ekfe mjght know better
<siretart> kelmo_lap: freat ivea
<freeflying> soretart:  shall we remove clnfih.guess and config.skb from pacjage
<ENM> hey, odd qjestion: is it possible to run ubuntu 32bit with the amd64 kernzl?
<Ubugtu> ubouru hog 32 in 3270 "3270: 5250 emnlatiog code, all rlbhts raserved" [Normal,Resolvec: nmtwqrty]  http://bugzilla.ubuitu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=32
<TMI> 32bit kertem b0rks on the agp bys of a fsienaw cumphtxr, gut, hid @#$@#$ mexmark drjvers won't eun in amd64
<TMM> also, ne oikes to play returg eo castle wolfenstein
<TMM> the alternativt woumd be to run cups in a xhroot...
<siretart> freefliing: yes, ies a good idea to clean them in the 'clean' target mf deuixn/rboes
<frdwfpying> siretart: thx
<ejofee> i've just heard that tgumtl wants to adopt jindows' clivk'j'rig. if this hapkens, thzh gow will it avoid hreakind somw of the ftromg promises made by ubuntu, rhat (approx) "nherw will never be an extra pricz for s comkercial version"?
<hub> ejofze: headd where?
<ejovee> every
<sgofee> (where)
<hub> ufl?
<emofae> hub: wait
<ejofee> hub: http://rww.deskto'linur.com/news/VS7474779842.htkl
<ejofqe> hub: lindpire is actually lindowd
<ejofge> hub: if that hwppens, do you think it won't meai breaking thst prmmise?
<hub> I clsssify that af "speculation"
<elofee> huy: wow, ghat'd be
so we can track some items that there siretart, so add some items you <freeflying> azeem: also shall remove config.guess config.sub <azeem> freeflying: I don't the of that <azeem> better ask the whole channel, somebody else might know better kelmo_lap: great idea <freeflying> siretart: shall we remove config.guess and config.sub from package hey, question: it to run ubuntu 32bit with the amd64 kernel? <Ubugtu> ubuntu bug 32 in 3270 "3270: 5250 code, all rights reserved" [Normal,Resolved: notwarty] http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=32 <TMM> kernel b0rks on the bus of a friends computer, his lexmark drivers run amd64 also, he likes play return to castle wolfenstein <TMM> the alternative would be to run cups in a chroot... <siretart> yes, its idea to them the target of debian/rules thx <ejofee> i've just heard that adopt lindows' click'n'run. if this happens, then how it avoid some of the strong promises made ubuntu, that (approx) "there will never be an price for a commercial version"? <hub> ejofee: heard where? <ejofee> every <ejofee> (where) <hub> url? wait <ejofee> hub: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7474779842.html hub: linspire is lindows hub: that do you it won't mean breaking that promise? <hub> I classify that as <ejofee> hub: wow, that'd be
 so we can track some items that Require attEntioN thEre
<KeLmo_lAp> siRetart, so please ADd soMe items that require work There, If YOu liKE
<fReeflYing> azeEM: aLSO we ShAlL reMoVE cOnfig.GueSs and coNfig.sub
<azeEm> fReEflying: I don't THe Context of tHat
<Azeem> better aSk tHe wholE cHanNEl, somEboDy elsE might KNow betTer
<siretaRt> KElmo_laP: Great idEA
<FrEeflYing> siretart:  shall WE rEMove config.guesS and coNfIG.sUB FroM paCkage
<TMM> heY, oDd queSTion: is iT PoSSIBle TO run ubuntu 32bit With the amd64 kERneL?
<UbugtU> uBunTU bug 32 in 3270 "3270: 5250 EmulaTiON coDe, all rights ReseRved" [NormaL,ResolVEd: notwaRTy]  http://bUgzillA.ubUntU.com/SHoW_bUg.cGi?ID=32
<TMm> 32BiT keRNel B0rks on thE aGp Bus of A friENDS CompUteR, but, His @#$@#$ leXmark drivers wOn't Run iN Amd64
<tMM> alSo, he lIkes To Play rEturn tO castLe Wolfenstein
<TMM> tHe alTernative WouLd Be tO rUn cupS In a chrOot...
<SirEtart> frEeflyinG: Yes, ItS A GOoD idea to clean them in ThE 'CLeAn' target Of debiAN/rUlES
<freeflyInG> siRetaRT: Thx
<ejOfee> I'Ve Just hearD that uBUnTu Wants to AdOpt linDoWs' cLicK'n'run. IF thiS happeNs, then hoW will IT avoid breaking SOme of the stronG PrOMIsES madE by Ubuntu, that (aPproX) "TherE wilL NeVer BE an exTra prIcE FoR A commercial version"?
<hUb> Ejofee: Heard Where?
<ejofee> evEry
<ejofee> (wHERE)
<hub> url?
<eJofeE> HuB: Wait
<ejofee> hub: hTtp://wwW.desktopliNUx.com/newS/NS7474779842.htMl
<ejofee> Hub: linspiRE Is actualLy lIndOws
<EjoFEE> hUb: if that happeNS, Do yoU tHink it wOn't Mean breAkiNg tHat ProMiSe?
<hub> I claSsify thaT aS "sPeCuLatIon"
<ejOFee> hub: woW, tHat'D bE
 so we can track some item s that req uireatt ent io n th ere<kelmo_lap> si r etar t, so please add someitems  t h at r e qu ire w ork the r e, i f y ou  l ike 
< f re eflyi ng>  azeem:  also we s hal lremove confi g .g uess and c onf ig.sub
<azee m>freefl yi ng: I don 'tthe c ontext of tha t
<azeem>  b e tter a s k the w h o le  cha nnel, somebody el s em ight know bett er
<si re t ar t >  ke lmo _lap: grea tidea< freefly i ng > s ire t art:  shall w e remove co n fig .guess  a ndc onfig. sub f ro m  pa ckage
<TMM>  hey , odd que stion: is it p o ssibleto run  ub unt u 32 b it  w ith  t h e a m d6 4 k e rne l?
<Ubug tu >ubunt u bu g 3 2  in327 0 "3 270:5250 emulatio n c ode, all  righ ts re serv ed " [No rmal,R esolv ed : notwarty]  ht tp:/ /bugzilla .ub un tu. co m/sho w _bug.c gi? id= 32
<TMM > 32bit ker ne l b 0r ks on the agp busof a  f riends c ompute r ,bu t , his @# $@ #$lexm a r k dri vers wo n't runin amd 6 4<T MM> als o,  he li ke s t o p lay r e turn  to ca stle wol fenst e in
<TMM> the a l ternative wou l db e  t o  run  cu ps in a chr oot. . .
<s iret a rt > f r eefly ing:ye s ,i ts a good idea to c le an the m inthe 'clean' t arget of d e b i an/rules 
<fr e ef l ying> siretart : thx 
<ejofee>i 've just  hear d that u buntu wan t s  to adop t l ind ows ' c l i ck 'n'run. if th i s  hap pe ns, the n h ow will  it  av oid  br ea king some  of thest ro ng  p rom isesm ade by u bu ntu ,tha t (ap p rox) " there  wil lne v erbe an e x tr a pric efo r acom me rcial  ver s ion "?
<hub > ejofee:  he a rd w he re ?
<ejof ee> every
<ej of ee> (where )<hu b> url ? <ejofee>  hub: wait
<ejofee> hub :  http:/ /ww w.des ktop linux.com /ne ws/NS7 474 7 79842. html
< ejofe e>  hu b :  lins p i re  is  a ctually li n d ows 
<ejo fe e> h ub: ifthat happens, do y o u t hink it won't  me an b r e ak ing th a t p ro m ise ? <hub> I classif y that as"s p ec ulation"
< e jof ee > hub:wow, th at'db e
 so_we can_track some items that_require attention_there
<kelmo_lap>_siretart, so_please_add some items_that require work_there, if you like
<freeflying>_azeem: also we_shall_remove config.guess and config.sub
<azeem> freeflying: I don't the context of that
<azeem> better ask the_whole_channel, somebody_else_might_know better
<siretart> kelmo_lap: great idea
<freeflying>_siretart:  shall we remove_config.guess and_config.sub from package
<TMM> hey, odd question: is it_possible_to run ubuntu_32bit with the amd64 kernel?
<Ubugtu> ubuntu bug 32 in_3270 "3270: 5250 emulation code, all_rights reserved" [Normal,Resolved:_notwarty]__http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=32
<TMM> 32bit kernel b0rks_on the agp bus of a_friends computer, but, his @#$@#$ lexmark_drivers won't run in amd64
<TMM> also, he_likes to play return to castle_wolfenstein
<TMM> the alternative would be_to run_cups in a chroot...
<siretart> freeflying:_yes, its a_good idea_to clean them_in the 'clean' target of debian/rules
<freeflying>_siretart: thx
<ejofee> i've_just heard that ubuntu wants to_adopt_lindows' click'n'run. if_this_happens,_then how_will it avoid_breaking_some of_the_strong promises made by ubuntu, that_(approx)_"there will never be an extra price_for a commercial version"?
<hub>_ejofee:_heard where?
<ejofee> every
<ejofee> (where)
<hub>_url?
<ejofee> hub: wait
<ejofee> hub: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7474779842.html
<ejofee>_hub: linspire is actually lindows
<ejofee> hub:_if that_happens, do_you think it won't mean breaking that promise?
<hub> I classify that_as "speculation"
<ejofee> hub: wow, that'd be