 3.0b4 backport (bug 191796); I subscribed you to it, let me know if there's anything you need (I know it's a huge one)
<ubotu> Launchpad bug 191796 in gutsy-backports "Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b3 final" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191796
<fta> jdong, why b3 final when b4 final is already out? it will confuse users.
<jdong> fta: the title has not been changed
<jdong> fta: the packages indeed are of the latest b4 finals in Hardy
<fta> could you please update the title?
<jdong> and spam 25 people? Sure :)
<fta> is it a full backport or did you revert some of the changes?
<jdong> fta: see attached debdiff. Several changes had to be reverted
<jdong> primarily the ones that set firefox-3.0 as the default firefox
<hellboy195> jdong: is it worth it to backport it? why not wait until the next beta or final?
<jdong> hellboy195: I think so
<fta> jdong, oh, ok, my changes are back in :)
<jdong> fta: :)
<jdong> hellboy195: ff3b4 is already a huge improvement over the ff3b3~ backport
<jdong> hellboy195: people are already getdebbing for these packages
<hellboy195> jdong: ah if there already exist a b3 backport than you are right ;) Did it start with the b3 backport?
<fta> jdong, that means no system cairo (hence no subpixel lcd filter) and no system nss/nspr. Should be ok
<fta> oh, i would advice to drop system-jpeg too
<fta> advise
<jdong> fta: system nss/nspr is too old on gutsy, I was told by asac to do that
<jdong> fta: what does dropping system-jpeg do?
<fta> system libjpeg is causing the infamous black rectangle
<fta> mozilla patched it quite heavily :P
<fta> asac
3.0b4 backport (bug 191796); I subscribed you to it, let me know if there's anything you necessitate (I acknowledge it's a huge one) 
 < ubotu > Launchpad bug 191796 in gutsy - backports " Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0 ~ b3 final " [ Undecided, Triaged ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191796 
 < fta > jdong, why b3 concluding when b4 final is already out? it will confuse user. 
 < jdong > fta: the title has not been changed 
 < jdong > fta: the package indeed are of the latest b4 finals in Hardy 
 < fta > could you please update the claim? 
 < jdong > and spam 25 people? Sure :) 
 < fta > is it a full backport or did you revert some of the change? 
 < jdong > fta: see attached debdiff. Several changes had to be revert 
 < jdong > primarily the ones that set firefox-3.0 as the default option firefox 
 < hellboy195 > jdong: is it worth it to backport it? why not wait until the next beta or final? 
 < jdong > hellboy195: I remember so 
 < fta > jdong, oh, ok, my changes are back in :) 
 < jdong > fta: :) 
 < jdong > hellboy195: ff3b4 is already a huge improvement over the ff3b3~ backport 
 < jdong > hellboy195: people are already getdebbing for these packages 
 < hellboy195 > jdong: ah if there already exist a b3 backport than you are right ;) Did it begin with the b3 backport? 
 < fta > jdong, that means no system cairo (hence no subpixel lcd filter) and no system nss / nspr. Should be ok 
 < fta > oh, i would advice to drop system - jpeg too 
 < fta > advise 
 < jdong > fta: system nss / nspr is too old on gutsy, I was told by asac to do that 
 < jdong > fta: what does dropping system - jpeg do? 
 < fta > arrangement libjpeg is causing the infamous bootleg rectangle 
 < fta > mozilla patch it quite heavy :P 
 < fta > asac
 3.0b4 hackport (bug 191796); I subscribtd you to it, let me know if thsre's anyghing you need (I know it's a iuge one)
<uvotu> Launchpad bug 191796 in gutsy-bacnports "Poeast backport firefoe-3.0 3.0~b3 final" [Undedlded,Txieged] https://launcmpad.net/bugs/191796
<xta> jdong, why t3 wiual when b4 final is already out? it wyll congude users.
<jdong> sta: uhe titmv mas not been changed
<jdong> fta: ths packajes indeed are pf the latest b4 finals in Jardj
<fta> could you plewse update jge eutle?
<jdong> ana spam 25 people? Sure :)
<ftz> is it a full backport or did hou rzvert some if thf changes?
<jdoig> fta: see attached debdifx. Seversl changes had to be reverted
<jdong> primarmly the ones that sej firefox-3.0 ds the default firedoz
<helltoy195> bdone: is it wprfh it ho uackport it? why not waut until the next btta ir final?
<jdong> hellbjy195: I think so
<fta> jdong, oh, ok, my changes age bzck in :)
<jdong> fta: :)
<jdong> yellboy195: ff3b4 is alreadi a huge iiprovement over the ff3b3~ backport
<jdong> hellboy195: peo[le ace alxcwat hetdebbing for these packages
<hellboy195> jdong: ah jf tmere already exift a b3 backlogt jhan you are rkght ;) Bjd it start with the b3 backkort?
<ftq> jdong, trat keans no system cairo (hence no subpixel ocd filter) and no dystem nss/nrpr. Xhoulc be ok
<fta> oh, i would abvice fo drop syshem-jpeg tku
<fta> advise
<jdong> fts: vystem nss/nspr is too old jn gutsy, M was told bh assc to qo that
<jdojg> fta: what does droppinh sysjem-jpec do?
<fta> sydtem libjpeg is causing the infekous black rgctdngne
<fta> movilla iatched it quitq heavily :P
<fta> asac
3.0b4 backport (bug 191796); I subscribed you let know if anything you need one) Launchpad bug 191796 gutsy-backports "Please backport 3.0~b3 final" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191796 <fta> jdong, b3 final when b4 final is already out? it will confuse users. <jdong> the title has not been changed <jdong> fta: the packages indeed are of latest finals Hardy could you please update the title? <jdong> and spam 25 people? Sure :) <fta> is it full backport or did you revert some of changes? <jdong> fta: see debdiff. Several changes had to reverted primarily the that firefox-3.0 the default firefox jdong: is it worth it to backport it? why not wait until the next beta or final? hellboy195: I <fta> jdong, ok, changes back in :) :) <jdong> hellboy195: ff3b4 is already over the ff3b3~ backport <jdong> hellboy195: people are getdebbing for packages <hellboy195> jdong: ah if there exist a b3 backport than you are right Did it start with the b3 backport? <fta> jdong, that means no system cairo (hence lcd filter) and no nss/nspr. Should be <fta> i advice drop system-jpeg <fta> advise <jdong> fta: system nss/nspr is too old on gutsy, was told by asac to do that <jdong> fta: what system-jpeg <fta> system libjpeg causing the infamous black <fta> patched it quite heavily asac
 3.0b4 backport (bug 191796); I subscribed yoU to it, let me Know iF thEre'S aNythIng yOu need (I know it's A Huge One)
<ubotu> Launchpad bug 191796 in Gutsy-BaCKporTS "PLease BackporT FiREFox-3.0 3.0~B3 fInAl" [UNdECiDed,TrIagEd] https://Launchpad.nEt/bUgS/191796
<fta> jdong, why B3 FiNal when b4 fiNal Is already out? It wIll conFuSe uSErs.
<jdOng> Fta: thE title HAs not bEen changeD
<jDOng> fta: THe packaGES iNdeeD are of the latest b4 fINaLS in Hardy
<fta> couLd you pLeASe UPDatE thE title?
<jdonG> aNd spaM 25 People? SURe :)
<FTA> Is iT A full backport Or did you revERt sOme of tHe ChaNGes?
<jdoNg> fta: SeE AttAched debdifF. SevEral changEs had tO Be reverTEd
<jdong> PrimarIly The Ones THaT sEt fIrEFox-3.0 AS tHe dEFauLt firefoX
<hElLboy195> jDong: IS IT WortH it To baCkporT it? why not wait UntIl thE NexT beta Or finAl?
<jdOnG> hellBoy195: I thInk so
<FtA> jdong, oh, ok, my chaNges Are back in :)
<JdoNg> Fta: :)
<JdOng> heLLboy195: ff3B4 is AlrEady a huGe improVEmeNt OVER tHe ff3b3~ backport
<jdong> HeLLBoY195: people aRe alreADy GeTDebbing fOr TheSe paCKAges
<hEllbOY195> jDong: ah if There aLReAdY exist a B3 bAckporT tHan You Are riGHt ;) DiD it staRt with thE b3 bacKPort?
<fta> jdong, thAT means no systeM CaIRO (hENce nO suBpixel lcd fiLter) ANd no SystEM nSs/nSPr. ShoUld be Ok
<FTa> OH, i would advice to drop SyStem-jpEg too
<Fta> advise
<jdonG> fta: system NSS/Nspr is toO old ON gUTsy, I was told by aSac to Do that
<jdonG> Fta: what dOes drOpping syStem-jpeg dO?
<FTa> system LibJpeG is CauSINg The infamous blACK recTaNgle
<fta> MozIlla patCheD it QuiTe hEaVily :P
<fta> aSac
 3.0b4 backport (bug 19179 6); I subs cribe d y outo  it,  let  me know if th e re's  anything you need (Iknowit ' s ah ug e one )
<ubot u >L a unc hp ad  bu g1 91 796 i n g utsy-ba ckports "P lea se  backport fi r ef ox-3.0 3.0 ~b3  final" [Und eci ded,Tr ia ged ]  http s:/ /laun chpad. n et/bug s/191796<f t a> jdo n g, whyb 3  f inal  when b4 final is al r eady out? it w ill co nf u se u ser s.<jdong> ft a:  thet itle ha s  n o t bee n  changed
<jdo ng> fta: th e  pa ckages  i nde e d areof th el ate st b4 final s in  Hardy
<f ta> co u ld youp lease u pdatethe  ti tle? <j do ng>  a n d s p am  25 peo ple? Sur e:) 
<fta > is i t a fu llback portor did you re ver t so m e o f the  chan ges? 
< jdong > fta:  seeat tached debdiff.  Sev eral chan ges  h adto  be r e verted 
<j don g> prim arily t h e o ne s t ha t set firefox-3.0as t he  default  firef o x<h e llboy195 >jdo ng:i s  it w orth it  to back port i t ?wh y not w ai t unti lthe  ne xt be t a or  final ?
<jdong > hel l boy195: I thin k  so
<fta> jdo n g, o h, ok,mychanges are  bac k  in:)
< j do ng> fta::)
<j do n g> hellboy195: ff3b4 i salread y a h uge improveme nt over th e f f3b3~ ba ckpo r t< jdong> hellboy 195:people are alreadygetde bbing fo r these p a c kages
<h ell boy 195 > j d o ng : ah if there a lrea dy  exista b 3 backp ort  th anyou  a re right;) Did i tst ar twit h the b3 backp or t?<f ta>  jdon g , that  mean s no  s ys t emcairo ( h en c e  nosu bp ixel  lc dfilte r) a n d n o syste m nss/nsp r.S houl dbe  ok
<ft a> oh, i woul dadvice todr opsystem - j peg too<fta> advise
<jdong> ft a : syste m n ss/ns pr i s too old  on  gutsy , I was to ld byasacto  do t hat
< j d on g>ft a: what do e s  dr oppin gsyst em-jpeg  do?
<fta> systeml ibj peg is causin g t he i n f am ous bl a ckre c tan g l e
<fta> mozilla  patched i tq ui te heavily :P<f ta> asa c
 3.0b4_backport (bug_191796); I subscribed you_to it,_let_me know_if_there's anything you_need (I know_it's a huge one)
<ubotu>_Launchpad bug 191796_in_gutsy-backports "Please backport firefox-3.0 3.0~b3 final" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191796
<fta> jdong, why b3 final when b4_final_is already_out?_it_will confuse users.
<jdong> fta: the_title has not been changed
<jdong>_fta: the_packages indeed are of the latest b4 finals_in_Hardy
<fta> could you_please update the title?
<jdong> and spam 25 people? Sure_:)
<fta> is it a full backport_or did you_revert_some_of the changes?
<jdong> fta:_see attached debdiff. Several changes had_to be reverted
<jdong> primarily the ones_that set firefox-3.0 as the default firefox
<hellboy195>_jdong: is it worth it to_backport it? why not wait_until the_next beta or final?
<jdong> hellboy195:_I think so
<fta>_jdong, oh,_ok, my changes_are back in :)
<jdong> fta: :)
<jdong>_hellboy195: ff3b4 is_already a huge improvement over the_ff3b3~_backport
<jdong> hellboy195: people_are_already_getdebbing for_these packages
<hellboy195> jdong:_ah_if there_already_exist a b3 backport than you_are_right ;) Did it start with the_b3 backport?
<fta> jdong, that_means_no system cairo (hence_no subpixel lcd filter) and_no system nss/nspr. Should be ok
<fta>_oh, i_would advice_to drop system-jpeg too
<fta> advise
<jdong> fta: system nss/nspr is too old_on gutsy, I was told by_asac to do that
<jdong>_fta: what_does_dropping system-jpeg do?
<fta>_system_libjpeg is_causing the infamous black rectangle
<fta> mozilla patched_it quite_heavily :P
<fta> asac