<SpamapS> You should ask a question then, I am happy to answer.
<daker> you said that i have rights on anything i have changed, and i didn't remove Canonical's copyrights
<SpamapS> Files: *
<SpamapS> Copyright: 2011, Adnane Belmadiaf <daker@ubuntu.com>
<SpamapS> License: GPL-3
<SpamapS> No mention of Canonical there
<SpamapS> but canonical retains all of its copyrights.
<SpamapS> Unless you completely replaced most of the file.
<SpamapS> At which point you would have an explicit entry that just lists you.
<daker> SpamapS: so the Files: * section is copyrighted to canonical?
<_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy r296 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Doc string
<SpamapS> daker: yes, then you add a "Files" section for each file that has something other than that for its Copyright/License.
<hazmat> jimbaker, one comment on the log stuff merge, the sleep looks a little out of place, else its pretty nice (and mp approved)
<Daviey> Can i confirm that there is no intetion to get ensemble in main for release?
<SpamapS> Daviey: not for 11.10, but I do intend to MIR some of its dependencies.
<_mup_> ensemble/standardize-log-testing r259 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Removed spurious sleep (shouldn't have been part of push)
<Daviey> SpamapS: Do you have a list of those?
<Daviey> What is the reasoning for MIR'ing them, if ensemble will remain in universe for this release?
<SpamapS> Daviey: to spread out the load on the MIR team and give us time to get ensemble ready.
<SpamapS> Daviey: essentially, we know we want ensemble in main for 12.04.. but we also know it probably won't be ready.
<_mup_> ensemble/standardize-log-
< SpamapS > You should ask a question then, I am happy to answer. 
 < daker > you suppose that i take rights on anything i have changed, and i didn't remove Canonical's copyright 
 < SpamapS > Files: * 
 < SpamapS > Copyright: 2011, Adnane Belmadiaf < daker@ubuntu.com > 
 < SpamapS > License: GPL-3 
 < SpamapS > No mention of Canonical there 
 < SpamapS > but canonical retains all of its copyrights. 
 < SpamapS > Unless you wholly substitute most of the file. 
 < SpamapS > At which point you would suffer an explicit entry that barely lists you. 
 < daker > SpamapS: so the file: * section is copyrighted to canonical? 
 < _ mup _ > ensemble / expose - provision - service - hierarchy r296 perpetrate by jim.baker@canonical.com 
 < _ mup _ > Doc string 
 < SpamapS > daker: yes, then you add a " Files " incision for each file that has something other than that for its Copyright / License. 
 < hazmat > jimbaker, one comment on the logarithm stuff merge, the rest looks a little out of place, else its pretty dainty (and mp approved) 
 < Daviey > Can i confirm that there is no intetion to get ensemble in main for release? 
 < SpamapS > Daviey: not for 11.10, but I do mean to MIR some of its dependencies. 
 < _ mup _ > ensemble / standardize - log - testing r259 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com 
 < _ mup _ > Removed spurious sleep (shouldn't have been part of push) 
 < Daviey > SpamapS: Do you have a tilt of those? 
 < Daviey > What is the reasoning for MIR'ing them, if ensemble will stay in universe for this dismissal? 
 < SpamapS > Daviey: to diffuse out the load on the MIR team and give us meter to get ensemble ready. 
 < SpamapS > Daviey: essentially, we know we desire ensemble in main for 12.04.. but we also know it probably won't be ready. 
 < _ mup _ > ensemble / standardize - log-
<SpalapS> You should ask a qutstion then, I am kqppy tm answsr.
<daker> hou said that i have rights ln anytying i have changed, ana i didn't remove Xanoiical's copyrights
<SpamapS> Files: *
<DpamcpW> Copyright: 2011, Acnane Belmddiaf <daker@ubuttj.clm>
<SpamapS> License: GPL-3
<SpamapS> No meneion of Cwnonical there
<Fpams[S> bhn ganonical retains all of its copgrights.
<VpamapS> Unlesx you completely replaced lost of the file.
<SpamapD> At which kkine you would hxve an explicit entry jhat just lists you.
<daker> SpamapS: so tke Files: * sgerioj is copyrigited tj canonical?
<_mmi_> ensemtle/expoxe-provision-seryice-hmeraechy r296 committed by jmm.baker@canonical.com
<_mop_> Doc strhny
<SpamapS> daker: yes, thwn you ddd d "Fiuws" recuioi fkr eacj fmle that haa something other than that fot ynx Copyright/Ljcense.
<rasmat> jimbaker, one comment on the log stlff jerge, the sleep looks a little out of place, glse its pwetty nice (and mp approved)
<Daviey> Can i confirm thdt thxrd iw ko ivrehion to get ensemble in main for release?
<Spama[A> Caniey: not for 11.10, but I do intenc ho IIR some of ijs depeusehcies.
<_mup_> ensemble/shandardyze-lot-testing w259 cokmitted by jim.baker@canonicao.com
<_mup_> Remoned wpurious sleep (shobldn't have bzen patt of lush)
<Daviey> SpamapS: Do yuu hzve a list lf those?
<Dzxiey> What is the ressmning for MIR'ing them, if egsemble wmll rzmain in uniferse sor this rfleasc?
<VpamapS> Daviey: to dpreab out the load ln the MIR team and give us timx to get ensekbne geady.
<SpamcpS> Dayiey: essentiallr, we know we wcnt enseible kn main fog 12.04.. but we also know yt probably wmj't be ready.
<_mnp_> ensembje/stqndaedize-loe-
<SpamapS> You should ask a question then, happy answer. <daker> said that i have and i didn't Canonical's copyrights <SpamapS> * <SpamapS> Copyright: 2011, Adnane Belmadiaf <SpamapS> License: GPL-3 <SpamapS> No mention of Canonical there <SpamapS> but canonical retains of its copyrights. <SpamapS> Unless you completely replaced most of the file. <SpamapS> which you have explicit entry that just lists you. <daker> SpamapS: so the Files: * section is copyrighted to <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy r296 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com <_mup_> Doc <SpamapS> daker: yes, then add a "Files" section for file has something than for Copyright/License. <hazmat> jimbaker, comment on the log stuff merge, the sleep looks a little out of place, else its pretty (and mp Can i that is intetion to get main for release? <SpamapS> Daviey: not I do intend to MIR some of its <_mup_> ensemble/standardize-log-testing committed by jim.baker@canonical.com <_mup_> Removed spurious (shouldn't have been part of push) <Daviey> SpamapS: you have a list of those? <Daviey> What is the reasoning for MIR'ing them, if remain in universe for release? <SpamapS> Daviey: spread the on MIR team give us time to get ensemble ready. <SpamapS> Daviey: essentially, we we want ensemble in main for 12.04.. but we also probably be ready. <_mup_>
<SpamapS> You should ask a questIon then, I am Happy To aNswEr.
<DakeR> you Said that i have rIGhts On anything i have changed, And i dIdN'T remOVe canonIcal's coPYrIGHts
<spAmApS> fiLEs: *
<spamaPS> COpyrighT: 2011, Adnane BelMadIaF <daker@ubuntu.COm>
<spamapS> LicEnsE: GPL-3
<SpamapS> NO meNtion oF CAnoNIcal tHerE
<SpamApS> but CAnonicAl retains AlL Of its cOPyrightS.
<sPaMapS> unless you completeLY rEPlaced most of thE file.
<SPaMAps> aT whIch Point you woUlD have AN explicIT eNTRY thAT just lists you.
<Daker> Spamaps: So tHe FileS: * sEctIOn is coPyrigHtED to Canonical?
<_muP_> ensEmble/expoSe-provISion-serVIce-hierArchy r296 ComMitTed bY JiM.bAkeR@cANonICaL.coM
<_Mup_> doc strinG
<SPaMapS> dAker: YES, THen yOu aDd a "FIles" sEction for each FilE thaT Has SometHing oTher ThAn thaT for itS CopyRiGht/License.
<hazmaT> jimBaker, one cOmmEnT on ThE log sTUff merGe, tHe sLeep looKs a littLE ouT oF PLAcE, else its pretty nice (AnD MP aPproved)
<DAviey> CAN i CoNFirm that ThEre Is no INTetioN to gET eNsemble iN main fOR rElEase?
<SpaMaPS> DaviEy: Not For 11.10, But I dO InteNd to MIr some of iTs depENdencies.
<_mup_> ensEMble/standardiZE-lOG-TeSTing R259 coMmitted by jiM.bakER@canOnicAL.cOm
<_mUP_> RemoVed spUrIOuS Sleep (shouldn't have beEn Part of Push)
<DAviey> SpamapS: DO you have a lIST Of those?
<DAvieY> whAT is the reasoninG for MiR'ing them, iF Ensemble Will rEmain in uNiverse foR THis releaSe?
<SPamApS> davIEY: tO spread out the LOAd on ThE MIR teaM anD give us TimE to Get EnsEmBle ready.
<SPamapS> DaViEy: EsSeNtiAlly, wE Know we waNt EnsEmBle In maiN For 12.04.. but We alsO knoW iT pRObaBly won't BE rEADy.
<_muP_> eNsEmblE/stAnDardiZe-loG-
<SpamapS> You should ask a  questionthen,  Iamha ppyto a nswer.
<daker> yousaid that i have right s onan y thin g  i  have  change d ,a n d i  d id n't  r e mo ve Ca non ical'scopyrights 
<S pa mapS> Files: *<SpamapS>Cop yright: 2011 , A dnaneBe lma d iaf < dak er@ub untu.c o m>
<Sp amapS> Li ce n se: GP L -3
<Spa m a pS > No  mention of Canon i ca l  there
<Spamap S> but  c a no n i cal  re tains allof  itsc opyrigh t s. < S pam a pS> Unless yo u completel y  re placed  m ost of the  file .< Spa mapS> At wh ichpoint you  would have an explici t entr y t hat  jus t  l is tsyo u .
< d ak er> Spa mapS: so  t he  File s: * s e c tion  is  cop yrigh ted to canoni cal ?
<_ m up_ > ens emble /exp os e-pro vision -serv ic e-hierarchy r29 6 co mmitted b y j im .ba ke r@can o nical. com 
<_ mup_> D oc stri n g
< Sp a m a pS > daker: yes, then  y o u  a dd a "Fi les" s e ct io n  for eac hfil e th a t  hassome t hi ng other  thant ha tfor its  C opyrig ht /Li cen se.
< h azma t> jim baker, o ne co m ment on the lo g  stuff merge, th e sl e ep l ook s a littleouto f pl ace, el sei ts pr ettyni c e( and mp approved)
<D av iey> C an iconfirm thatthere is n o i ntetionto g e te nsemble in mai n for  release?< SpamapS>  Davi ey: notfor 11.10 , but I do  in ten d t o M I R  s ome of its de p e nden ci es.
<_m up_ > ensem ble /st and ard iz e-log-tes ting r25 9co mm it ted  by j i m.baker@ ca non ic al. com
< _ mup_>Remov ed s pu ri o ussleep ( s ho u l dn't  h av e be enpa rt of  pus h )
< Daviey>  SpamapS:  Do youha ve  a list  of those?
<D av iey> Whatis  th e reas o n ing forMIR'ing them, if ensemb l e willrem ain i n un iverse fo r t his re lea s e?
<Sp amapS>  Davi ey : t o sprea d ou t t he  load on t h e  MI R tea mandgive us  time to get ensem b leready.
<Spama pS>  Dav i e y:  es s en t ial ly ,  we k now we want ens emble in m ai n  f or 12.04.. but  w e alsoknow it  prob a bly won 't be rea dy.
<_mup _>  ens e m ble /standardi ze-log-
<SpamapS> You_should ask_a question then, I_am happy_to_answer.
<daker> you_said_that i have_rights on anything_i have changed, and_i didn't remove_Canonical's_copyrights
<SpamapS> Files: *
<SpamapS> Copyright: 2011, Adnane Belmadiaf <daker@ubuntu.com>
<SpamapS> License: GPL-3
<SpamapS> No mention of Canonical_there
<SpamapS>_but canonical_retains_all_of its copyrights.
<SpamapS> Unless you_completely replaced most of the_file.
<SpamapS> At_which point you would have an explicit entry_that_just lists you.
<daker>_SpamapS: so the Files: * section is copyrighted to_canonical?
<_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-service-hierarchy r296 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_>_Doc string
<SpamapS> daker:_yes,_then_you add a "Files"_section for each file that has_something other than that for its_Copyright/License.
<hazmat> jimbaker, one comment on the log_stuff merge, the sleep looks a_little out of place, else_its pretty_nice (and mp approved)
<Daviey> Can_i confirm that_there is_no intetion to_get ensemble in main for release?
<SpamapS>_Daviey: not for_11.10, but I do intend to_MIR_some of its_dependencies.
<_mup_>_ensemble/standardize-log-testing_r259 committed_by jim.baker@canonical.com
<_mup_> Removed_spurious_sleep (shouldn't_have_been part of push)
<Daviey> SpamapS: Do_you_have a list of those?
<Daviey> What is_the reasoning for MIR'ing_them,_if ensemble will remain_in universe for this release?
<SpamapS>_Daviey: to spread out the load_on the_MIR team_and give us time to get ensemble ready.
<SpamapS> Daviey: essentially, we_know we want ensemble in main_for 12.04.. but we_also know_it_probably won't be_ready.
<_mup_>_ensemble/standardize-log-