 slomo: I cat *changes everytime after signing (and most of the time before signing as well, silly paranoia that is *g*)
<Erlang> slomo: oooh :| that means what I have in Debian NEW might get rejected AGAIN
<slomo> sistpoty: hm, i sign while building the source package... afterwards pbuilder on exactly that signed dsc and then upload when everything is fine :)
<slomo> Erlang: don't worry, the ftp-master don't look at such things normally... most of the time wrong debian/copyright is the reason for REJECTED ;)
<LaserJock> hmm, I'm not seeing why -v needs to be used
<Erlang> slomo: that was indeed the reason last time.  I hope what you say is true since NEW processing has been a bit long for me.
<slomo> LaserJock: to get a complete changelog of things on changes... and the changelog function in launchpad seems to depend on it too
<slomo> Erlang: which package is it?
<Erlang> erlang 10.b.9-2
<sistpoty> LaserJock: just try it with different versions and take a look at the.changes file ;)
<sistpoty> LaserJock: (i.e. with different versions after -v)
<slomo> Erlang: and you missed a copyright holder last time? or what was wrong? :)
<Erlang> slomo: yes I missed 2 applications that were GPL.  The rest of the thing is under Erlang Public License.
<slomo> Erlang: happened to me with nemerle too ;)
<LaserJock> so should I always do -v or should I only do it when I need to include more than the lasted changelog entry?
<slomo> LaserJock: only when more than the latest changelog entry is new
<LaserJock> slomo: ok, that makes sense.
<LaserJock> raphink: ahh, you got it?
<raphink> LaserJock: didn't buy it yet for read, but the deal is made, just have to get the money
<raphink> and it's already installed as double boot panther/kubuntu
slomo: I cat * changes everytime after signing (and most of the time before sign equally well, silly paranoia that is * g *) 
 < Erlang > slomo: oooh :| that mean what I own in Debian NEW might get rejected AGAIN 
 < slomo > sistpoty: hm, i sign while build the source package... subsequently pbuilder on precisely that signed dsc and then upload when everything is all right :) 
 < slomo > Erlang: don't worry, the ftp - master don't look at such things normally... most of the meter wrong debian / copyright is the reason for REJECTED ;) 
 < LaserJock > hmm, I'm not seeing why -v needs to be used 
 < Erlang > slomo: that was indeed the rationality last time.   I hope what you say is on-key since NEW processing has been a bit long for me. 
 < slomo > LaserJock: to get a accomplished changelog of things on changes... and the changelog function in launchpad seems to count on it too 
 < slomo > Erlang: which package is it? 
 < Erlang > erlang 10.b.9 - 2 
 < sistpoty > LaserJock: just try it with different versions and drive a look at the.changes file ;) 
 < sistpoty > LaserJock: (i.e. with different versions after -v) 
 < slomo > Erlang: and you missed a copyright holder last time? or what was wrong? :) 
 < Erlang > slomo: yes I missed 2 applications that were GPL.   The rest of the matter is under Erlang Public License. 
 < slomo > Erlang: happen to me with nemerle too ;) 
 < LaserJock > indeed should I constantly do -v or should I only do it when I necessitate to include more than the lasted changelog entry? 
 < slomo > LaserJock: only when more than the latest changelog entrance is new 
 < LaserJock > slomo: ok, that makes sense. 
 < LaserJock > raphink: ahh, you got it? 
 < raphink > LaserJock: didn't buy it yet for read, but the batch is made, just have to get the money 
 < raphink > and it's already install as bivalent bang panther / kubuntu
 sllmo: I cat *changes everytlme after signiny (and mmst of the timd before signing as well, silpy paraboia that is *g*)
<Erlang> suomo: oooh :| that mwans qhat I havx in Deblcn NES migkt get rejected SGAIN
<slomo> sistpoty: hm, i skgu while building the source package... wfterwatdd pbuilder on gxactkr thzn wigned dsc and then upload whsn everjthing is fine :)
<slpmo> Erlang: don't worry, the vtp-mwster don't look at such thingw nownally... most ow the time wrong debiah/copyright is the reason for REGECTEB ;)
<LaserJock> hnm, L'k not seeinj why -n needs to be used
<Erldng> sloko: that was inceev thw reason last time.  I hope what you say is true viuce NEW processing haw veen d bid lovt fur je.
<xlkmo> LaderOock: to get a complete changelog of thingx jb changes... and the craggelog function in launchpad seems to dtpend on it too
<slomo> Erlang: qhich package is it?
<Erpang> erlagg 10.b.9-2
<sistpoty> LaserJock: just try it with different versmovs ckq rane a look at the.changes file ;)
<sistpoty> LaserJosi: (o.e. with differenb versions after -v)
<xllmp> Erlang: and yuu missed a copyright holdeg last jime? oe what waf wrpng? :)
<Erlang> slomo: yes I misswd 2 applicatpons that were GPL.  Thz rest of thz thinb is inder Erlang Public Licznse.
<slkmo> Erlang: jappened fu me with nemerld tpo ;)
<LaserJock> so should I alwwys do -v ir skould I unly do it when I nefd to include more than hhe lcsted changelog entry?
<slomo> LaserJock: only when more than the ldtevt changzlog ektry is new
<LasewJock> slomo: ok, that mckes sdnse.
<LaserJkck> rapiink: ahh, you got it?
<raphinn> LaserJock: dmdn't buy yt ywt fir read, cut the deal ix made, just have to get the money
<raphlnk> avs it's already iuruaoled as double bout [ajtier/kufgntu
slomo: I cat *changes everytime after signing of time before as well, silly slomo: :| that means I have in NEW might get rejected AGAIN <slomo> hm, i sign while building the source package... afterwards pbuilder on exactly that dsc and then upload when everything is fine :) <slomo> Erlang: don't worry, ftp-master look such normally... most of the time wrong debian/copyright is the reason for REJECTED ;) <LaserJock> hmm, I'm seeing why -v needs to be used <Erlang> that was indeed the last time. I hope what say true since processing been bit long for <slomo> LaserJock: to get a complete changelog of things on changes... and the changelog function in launchpad to depend too <slomo> which is <Erlang> erlang 10.b.9-2 just try it with different versions look at the.changes file ;) <sistpoty> LaserJock: (i.e. different versions -v) <slomo> Erlang: and you missed copyright holder last time? or what was wrong? <Erlang> slomo: yes I missed 2 applications that were GPL. The rest of the thing Erlang Public License. <slomo> happened to me nemerle ;) so I always -v or should I only do it when I need to more than the lasted changelog entry? <slomo> LaserJock: only when the changelog entry is <LaserJock> slomo: ok, that sense. raphink: ahh, you got LaserJock: buy read, the is made, just have get the money <raphink> and already installed as double
 slomo: I cat *changes everytime After signiNg (and MosT of ThE timE befOre signing as weLL, silLy paranoia that is *g*)
<ErlanG> slomO: oOOh :| thAT mEans wHat I havE In dEBiaN NeW MigHt GEt RejecTed aGAIN
<slOmo> sistpotY: hm, I sIgn while builDInG the source PacKage... afterwarDs pBuildeR oN exACtly tHat SigneD dsc anD Then upLoad when eVeRYthing IS fine :)
<slOMO> ERlanG: don't worry, the ftp-mAStER don't look at sucH thingS nORmALLy... mOst Of the time wRoNg debIAn/copyrIGhT IS The REason for REJECtED ;)
<LaserJocK> Hmm, i'm not sEeIng WHy -v neeDs to bE uSEd
<ERlang> slomo: tHat wAs indeed tHe reasON last tiME.  I hope wHat you Say Is tRue sINcE NeW pRoCEssINg Has BEen A bit long FoR mE.
<slomO> LasERjOCk: to Get A comPlete Changelog of thIngS on cHAngEs... and The chAngeLoG funcTion in LauncHpAd seems to depend On it Too
<slomo> ERlaNg: WhiCh PackaGE is it?
<ERlaNg> eRlang 10.b.9-2
<sIstpoty> lAseRJOCK: JuSt try it with differeNt VERsIons and tAke a loOK aT tHE.changes FiLe ;)
<sIstpOTY> LaseRJocK: (I.e. With diffErent vERsIoNs after -V)
<sLomo> ErLaNg: aNd yOu misSEd a cOpyrigHt holder Last tIMe? or what was wroNG? :)
<Erlang> slomo: yES I MISsED 2 appLicAtions that wEre Gpl.  The Rest OF tHe tHIng is Under erLAnG public License.
<slomo> ERlAng: hapPened To me with nemerLe too ;)
<LaserjOCK> so shoulD I alWAyS Do -v or should I onLy do iT when I need TO include More tHan the laSted changELOg entry?
<sLomO> LaSerjocK: ONlY when more than THE latEsT changeLog Entry is New
<lasErJOck> SlOmo: ok, that Makes senSe.
<laSeRJOck> RaphiNK: ahh, you gOt It?
<rApHinK> LaseRjock: diDn't buY it yEt FoR ReaD, but the DEaL IS madE, jUsT havE to GeT the mOney
<RAphInk> and iT's already InsTAlleD aS dOuble boOt panther/kubuNtU
 slomo: I cat *changes eve rytime aft er si gni ng(a nd m ostof the time be f oresigning as well, silly  para no i a th a tis *g *)
<Erl a ng > slo mo :ooo h: |thatmea ns what  I have in  De bi an NEW might ge t rejected  AG AIN
<slomo>sis tpoty:  h m,i  sign  wh ile b uildin g  the s ource pac ka g e... a f terward s pb uild er on exactly tha t  s i gned dsc and t hen up lo a dw h eneve rything is  f ine : ) 
<slomo >  E r l a ng: don't worry,the ftp-mas t erdon'tlo oka t such  thin gs nor mally... mo st o f the tim e wron g  debian / copyrig ht isthe  re ason fo rREJ EC T ED; )<La s erJ ock> hmm ,I' m not  see i n g why-vneed s tobe used
<Erla ng>  slo m o:thatwas i ndee dthe r easonlastti me.  I hope wha t yo u say istru esin ce  NEWp rocess ing  ha s beena bit l o ngfo r m e. 
<slomo> LaserJock :t o  g et a com pletec ha ng e log of t hi ngs  onc h anges ...a nd  the cha ngelog fu nc tion in  l aunchp ad  se ems  to d e pend  on it  too
<sl omo>E rlang: which p a ckage is it?< Er l a ng >  erl ang  10.b.9-2
< sist p oty>  Las e rJ ock :  just  tryit wi t h different version sand ta ke alook at the.c hanges fil e ; )
<sistp oty> La s erJock: (i.e.withdifferentv ersionsafter  -v)
<sl omo> Erla n g : and yo u m iss eda c o p yr ight holder l a s t ti me ? or wh atwas wro ng?  :) 
<E rla ng > slomo:yes I mi ss ed  2  a ppl icati o ns thatwe reGP L. Ther est of  thethin gis und er Erla n gP u blic  L ic ense .
< sl omo>Erla n g:happene d to me w ith neme rl etoo ;)<LaserJock> s oshould I a lw ays  do -v o r should  I only do it when I ne e d to in clu de mo re t han the l ast ed cha nge l og ent ry?
<s lomo>  L ase r J ock:o n ly  wh en  more than t helates tchan gelog e ntry is new
<Laser J ock > slomo: ok,tha t ma k e ssen s e. <La se r Joc k >  raphink: ahh,you got it ?< ra phink> Las e rJo ck : didn' t buy i t yet for rea d, but th e deal is  m ade, j ust  have to g et the m oney
<rap h ink>a nd  it's  al readyin sta lledas dou b lebootpanthe r/ kubunt u
 slomo:_I cat_*changes everytime after signing_(and most_of_the time_before_signing as well,_silly paranoia that_is *g*)
<Erlang> slomo: oooh_:| that means_what_I have in Debian NEW might get rejected AGAIN
<slomo> sistpoty: hm, i sign while_building_the source_package..._afterwards_pbuilder on exactly that signed_dsc and then upload when_everything is_fine :)
<slomo> Erlang: don't worry, the ftp-master don't_look_at such things_normally... most of the time wrong debian/copyright is the_reason for REJECTED ;)
<LaserJock> hmm, I'm_not seeing why_-v_needs_to be used
<Erlang> slomo:_that was indeed the reason last_time.  I hope what you_say is true since NEW processing has_been a bit long for me.
<slomo>_LaserJock: to get a complete_changelog of_things on changes... and the_changelog function in_launchpad seems_to depend on_it too
<slomo> Erlang: which package is_it?
<Erlang> erlang 10.b.9-2
<sistpoty>_LaserJock: just try it with different_versions_and take a_look_at_the.changes file_;)
<sistpoty> LaserJock: (i.e._with_different versions_after_-v)
<slomo> Erlang: and you missed a_copyright_holder last time? or what was wrong?_:)
<Erlang> slomo: yes I_missed_2 applications that were_GPL.  The rest of_the thing is under Erlang Public_License.
<slomo> Erlang:_happened to_me with nemerle too ;)
<LaserJock> so should I always do -v_or should I only do it_when I need to_include more_than_the lasted changelog_entry?
<slomo>_LaserJock: only_when more than the latest changelog entry_is new
<LaserJock>_slomo: ok, that makes sense.
<LaserJock> raphink:_ahh, you got it?
<raphink>_LaserJock:_didn't buy it yet for read,_but the deal is made, just_have to get the money
<raphink>_and_it's_already installed as double boot_panther/kubuntu