okoZar: The most cursory scan suggests the question: Why is it versioned as 0.9.57-0ubuntu1-1?
<tonyyarusso> Any MOTUs have a minute to upload the updated conduit?  2 ACKs already given.
<Hobbsee> pwnguin: launchpad clearly can't be released as a FLOSS project today, because then everyone would see the amount of hacks, and general crack in launchpad, and would then refuse to use it for their projects, due to it's quality.
<Hobbsee> this is simple.
<Hobbsee> see the interesting crack surrounding how launchpad implements private bugs.
<Hobbsee> (when the entire librarian, which all files get stored on, is public)
<superm1> crimsun, it was bug 200044.  sorry i've been out for part of the evening
<ubotwo> Launchpad bug 200044 in mythbuntu "MythTV 0.21 Suite backport" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200044
<YokoZar> RAOF: oh whoops, that was a typo when I did uupdate.  If that matters I can fix it, however we'll likely have another Wine package after this one too
<YokoZar> RAOF: at which point it'll be 0.9.58-0ubuntu1
<RAOF> YokoZar: It's still a good idea to fix up this candidate, even if the next one may come (hasn't.57 been recently released?)
<YokoZar> RAOF: Yes it will be 2 weeks for the next one
<RAOF> YokoZar: So, the question becomes... why not wait those 2 weeks? :)
<YokoZar> RAOF: Because Hardy only has 0.9.56
<YokoZar> RAOF: my package fixes some other bugs too (ubuntu specific)
<RAOF> Right.  _That_ is a reason :)
<ianweller> hi, i've packaged some software for fedora, and the developer of the upstream has asked me to find a maintainer for ubuntu. is anyone interested and/or where else could i ask
<tonyyarusso> ianweller: you'll probably have better luck if you say what the package is.  
okoZar: The most cursory scan suggests the question: Why is it versioned as 0.9.57 - 0ubuntu1 - 1? 
 < tonyyarusso > Any MOTUs have a minute to upload the update conduit?   2 ACKs already render. 
 < Hobbsee > pwnguin: launchpad clearly can't be released as a FLOSS undertaking today, because then everyone would see the amount of hacks, and cosmopolitan wisecrack in launchpad, and would then defy to use it for their projects, due to it's timbre. 
 < Hobbsee > this is simple. 
 < Hobbsee > see the interesting crack surrounding how launching pad implements private bug. 
 < Hobbsee > (when the entire librarian, which all files get store on, is public) 
 < superm1 > crimsun, it was bug 200044.   sorry i've been out for part of the evening 
 < ubotwo > Launchpad bug 200044 in mythbuntu " MythTV 0.21 Suite backport " [ on the fence, New ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200044 
 < YokoZar > RAOF: oh whoops, that was a typo when I did uupdate.   If that matters I can fix it, however we'll probably have another Wine software after this one too 
 < YokoZar > RAOF: at which point it'll be 0.9.58 - 0ubuntu1 
 < RAOF > YokoZar: It's still a good estimate to fix up this candidate, even if the next one may come (hasn't.57 been recently released ?) 
 < YokoZar > RAOF: Yes it will be 2 week for the next one 
 < RAOF > YokoZar: So, the question becomes... why not wait those 2 weeks? :) 
 < YokoZar > RAOF: Because Hardy only has 0.9.56 
 < YokoZar > RAOF: my package fixes some other bug too (ubuntu specific) 
 < RAOF > Right.   _ That _ is a reason :) 
 < ianweller > hi, i've box some software for fedora, and the developer of the upstream has ask me to receive a maintainer for ubuntu. is anyone interested and/or where else could i necessitate 
 < tonyyarusso > ianweller: you'll probably accept better luck if you pronounce what the package is.
okoXar: The most cursory scak suggests the qoewtion: Xhy is jt versiuned as 0.9.57-0ubuntu1-1?
<tonyyarusso> Anb MORUs hqve a minute to upload the updaned conduut?  2 QCKs alreavg given.
<Mjbbssc> pwnyumn: launchpad clgarly can't ba released as d WLLSS project today, because then everrone woilf see the amougt og hacis, and general crack in launchpad, znd wound then refusr to use it for their projfcts, due to it's qualitj.
<Hobbsee> thus if simple.
<Hobbsde> see the interesting crack surrounding how launchpaa impkements pruvqte tugs.
<Hobbsee> (when the entire librariat, which all files get stmree on, is public)
<superm1> rrimsun, it was bug 200044.  sorry i'va yeen out for part of rhw eveting
<gbotdi> Lxundh'ad bug 200044 ln jythbuntu "JythTV 0.21 Suire backport" [Undecidtd,Nqq] https://launchlad.net/fuds/200044
<YokoZar> RAOF: oh whoops, that was a typm wgen I did uupdate.  If tyat matters I can fix it, howevqr we'll likely have another Wine package after thhs onx goo
<VikoZaf> RWOF: at which point it'll be 0.9.58-0ubuntu1
<RAOF> YokoZar: Jt'x xtill a good ibea to fix up thos csgdidate, even kf the nest one may come (hadn't.57 beeg recwntly reltased?)
<UokoZar> RAOF: Yes it will be 2 weeks for nhe bext one
<RAOF> YokoZcr: So, the quzstion becokes... why not wait those 2 weeis? :)
<YokoZar> GAOF: Becahre Hardy only har 0.9.56
<YpkmZar> RAOF: my package fixes some othxr buys too (ucunto specisic)
<RAOF> Rihht.  _Bvat_ is a reason :)
<iajwellgr> hi, h've packagfd some software for fedora, and the developer ox tve upstrzam hax asked me to find a maintanner for ubungu. is anyohe intecested and/or where else cmold i ask
<tonybarusso> iwnweoler: you'll ofobably have brtter luck if you sqy what the packagc is.  
okoZar: The most cursory scan suggests the is versioned as <tonyyarusso> Any MOTUs the conduit? 2 ACKs given. <Hobbsee> pwnguin: clearly can't be released as a project today, because then everyone would see the amount of hacks, and general in launchpad, and would then refuse to use it for their projects, due it's <Hobbsee> is <Hobbsee> see the interesting crack surrounding how launchpad implements private bugs. <Hobbsee> (when the entire librarian, all files get stored on, is public) <superm1> it was bug 200044. i've been out for part the <ubotwo> Launchpad 200044 mythbuntu 0.21 Suite backport" https://launchpad.net/bugs/200044 <YokoZar> RAOF: oh whoops, that was a typo when I did uupdate. If that matters I fix it, likely have Wine after one too <YokoZar> which point it'll be 0.9.58-0ubuntu1 <RAOF> a good idea to fix up this candidate, if the one may come (hasn't.57 been recently <YokoZar> RAOF: Yes it will be 2 weeks the next one <RAOF> YokoZar: So, the question becomes... why not wait those 2 weeks? RAOF: Because Hardy only 0.9.56 <YokoZar> RAOF: package some bugs (ubuntu specific) Right. _That_ is a reason :) <ianweller> hi, i've packaged some for fedora, and the developer of the upstream has asked find maintainer for ubuntu. anyone interested and/or where could ask <tonyyarusso> ianweller: you'll better if the is.
okoZar: The most cursory scan sUggests the QuestIon: why Is It veRsioNed as 0.9.57-0ubuntu1-1?
<tonYYaruSso> Any MOTUs have a minute To uplOaD The uPDaTed coNduit?  2 ACkS aLREadY gIvEn.
<HObBSeE> pwngUin: LaunchpAd clearly cAn't Be Released as a FloSs project toDay, Because then eVerYone woUlD seE The amOunT of haCks, and GEneral Crack in laUnCHpad, anD Would thEN ReFuse To use it for their prOJeCTs, due to it's qualIty.
<HobBsEE> tHIS is SimPle.
<Hobbsee> SeE the iNTerestiNG cRACK suRRounding how laUnchpad implEMenTs privAtE buGS.
<HobbsEe> (wheN tHE enTire librariAn, whIch all filEs get sTOred on, iS Public)
<sUperm1> cRimSun, It waS BuG 200044.  sOrrY i'VE beEN oUt fOR paRt of the eVeNiNg
<uboTwo> LAUNCHpad Bug 200044 In myThbunTu "MythTV 0.21 Suite BacKporT" [undEcideD,New] hTtps://LaUnchpAd.net/bUgs/200044
<YoKozar> RAOF: oh whoops, That Was a typo wHen i dId uUpDate.  IF That maTteRs I Can fix iT, howeveR We'lL lIKELy Have another Wine pacKaGE AfTer this oNe too
<YOKozaR> rAOF: at whIcH poInt iT'LL be 0.9.58-0ubUntu1
<raOf> YokoZar: it's stiLL a GoOd idea tO fIx up thIs CanDidAte, evEN if tHe next One may coMe (hasN'T.57 been recently rELeased?)
<YokoZar> raOf: yEs IT wilL be 2 Weeks for the Next ONe
<RAoF> YoKOZAr: SO, The quEstioN bECoMEs... why not wait those 2 weEkS? :)
<YokoZAr> RAOf: Because Hardy Only has 0.9.56
<YokOzAR> RAOF: my pAckaGE fIXes some other buGs too (Ubuntu specIFic)
<RAOF> RIght.  _THat_ is a reAson :)
<ianweLLEr> hi, i've pAckAgeD soMe sOFTwAre for fedora, aND The dEvEloper oF thE upstreAm hAs aSkeD me To Find a mainTainer foR uBuNtU. iS anYone iNTerested AnD/or WhEre Else cOUld i asK
<tonyYaruSsO> iANweLler: you'LL pROBablY hAvE betTer LuCk if yOu saY WhaT the pacKage is.  
okoZar: The most cursory s can sugges ts th e q ues ti on:Whyis it versione d  as0.9.57-0ubuntu1-1?
<to nyyar us s o> A n yMOTUs  have a mi n u teto  u plo ad th e upd ate d condu it?  2 ACK s a lr eady given.< Ho bbsee> pwn gui n: launchpad  cl earlyca n't be re lea sed a s a FL O SS pro ject toda y, becaus e  then e v e ry onewould see the amo u nt of hacks, andgenera lc ra c k  in  la unchpad, a nd  woul d  then r e fu s e tou se it for the ir projects ,  du e to i t' s q u ality. 
<Hob bs e e>this is sim ple. 
<Hobbsee > seet he inte r estingcracksur rou ndin g  h ow  la un c hpa d  i mpl e men ts priva te  b ugs.<Hob b s e e > (w hen  the  enti re librarian,  wh icha llfiles  getstor ed  on,is pub lic)<s uperm1> crimsun , it  was bug200 04 4. s orryi 've be enout  for pa rt of t h e e ve n i n g<ubotwo> Launchpad  b u g  2 00044 in  mythb u nt u" MythTV 0 .2 1 S uite b ackpo rt"[ Un decided, New] h t tp s: //launc hp ad.net /b ugs /20 0044< Yoko Zar> R AOF: ohwhoop s , that was a t y po when I did uu p d at e .  I f t hat matters  I c a n fi x it ,  h owe v er we 'll l ik e ly have another Wine p ac kage a fterthis one too<YokoZar>R A O F: at wh ichp oi n t it'll be 0.9 .58-0 ubuntu1
<R A OF> Yoko Zar:It's sti ll a good i dea to f ixupthi s c a n di date, even if t he n ex t one m aycome (h asn 't. 57bee nrecentlyreleased ?) 
< Yo ko Zar > RAO F : Yes it  w ill  b e 2  week s  for t he ne xt o ne 
< R AOF > YokoZ a r: S o, t he  q uest ion  b ecome s... why  not wa it those2 w e eks?  : )<YokoZa r> RAOF: Beca us e Hardy on ly  ha s 0.9. 5 6 
<YokoZa r> RAOF: my package fix e s someoth er bu gs t oo (ubunt u s pecifi c)< RAOF>Right.   _Th at _ i s a rea s o n:)<i anweller>h i , i 've p ac kage d somesoftware for fedor a , a nd the develo per  oft h eups t re a m h as ask e d  me to find a m aintainerfo r  u buntu. isa nyo ne  intere sted an d/orw here el se couldi ask
<to ny yaru s s o>ianweller:  you'llprobablyh ave b e tt er lu ckif you  s aywhatthe pa c kag e is.   
okoZar: The_most cursory_scan suggests the question:_Why is_it_versioned as_0.9.57-0ubuntu1-1?
<tonyyarusso>_Any MOTUs have_a minute to_upload the updated conduit?_ 2 ACKs_already_given.
<Hobbsee> pwnguin: launchpad clearly can't be released as a FLOSS project today, because then_everyone_would see_the_amount_of hacks, and general crack_in launchpad, and would then_refuse to_use it for their projects, due to it's_quality.
<Hobbsee>_this is simple.
<Hobbsee>_see the interesting crack surrounding how launchpad implements private_bugs.
<Hobbsee> (when the entire librarian, which_all files get_stored_on,_is public)
<superm1> crimsun, it_was bug 200044.  sorry i've_been out for part of the_evening
<ubotwo> Launchpad bug 200044 in mythbuntu "MythTV_0.21 Suite backport" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200044
<YokoZar> RAOF:_oh whoops, that was a_typo when_I did uupdate.  If_that matters I_can fix_it, however we'll_likely have another Wine package after_this one too
<YokoZar>_RAOF: at which point it'll be_0.9.58-0ubuntu1
<RAOF>_YokoZar: It's still_a_good_idea to_fix up this_candidate,_even if_the_next one may come (hasn't.57 been_recently_released?)
<YokoZar> RAOF: Yes it will be 2_weeks for the next_one
<RAOF>_YokoZar: So, the question_becomes... why not wait those_2 weeks? :)
<YokoZar> RAOF: Because Hardy_only has_0.9.56
<YokoZar> RAOF:_my package fixes some other bugs too (ubuntu specific)
<RAOF> Right. __That_ is a reason :)
<ianweller> hi,_i've packaged some software_for fedora,_and_the developer of_the_upstream has_asked me to find a maintainer for_ubuntu. is_anyone interested and/or where else could_i ask
<tonyyarusso> ianweller: you'll_probably_have better luck if you say_what the package is.  