> True, we're still speculating on what we want 'official' to mean.
<niemeyer> kim0: There's a significant difference between "you can't create a package" and "your package is not part of main"
<niemeyer> kim0: Most people don't care that their packages are not part of main
<kim0> SpamapS: cool, as long as they show up in searches.. that's lovely :)
<kim0> yeah
<daker> back
<daker> niemeyer: license question
<niemeyer> daker: Sure
<daker> my formula is based on the wp one, what should i do?
<SpamapS> daker: merge the latest copyright file from the wordpress formula, and then add your own copyright to it where appropriate.
<SpamapS> daker: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ensemble-composers/principia/oneiric/wordpress/trunk/view/head:/copyright
<daker> SpamapS: can you give an example on how my copyright should be?
<SpamapS> daker: on the next line after Copyright: Copyright 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rights Reserved.
<SpamapS> actually
<SpamapS> no, add a Files: section.. 
<SpamapS> Files: hooks/db-relation-changed
<SpamapS> Copyright: 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rights Reserved
<SpamapS>   2011, YOUR NAME <your@email.com>
<SpamapS> License: GPL-3
<SpamapS> That should do it
<daker> ok
<daker> SpamapS: thanks
<SpamapS> daker: if you totally rewrote hooks/install, you can list it there too
<daker> SpamapS: is it good http://paste.ubuntu.com/627597/?
<SpamapS> daker: you do not need to create a Files section for anything you did not change. Just let the 'File: *' handle that
<SpamapS> daker: each Files: section needs a License: portion, but does not have to repeat the text.
> True, we're still speculating on what we want' official' to think of. 
 < niemeyer > kim0: There's a meaning difference between " you can't create a software " and " your package is not share of main " 
 < niemeyer > kim0: Most multitude don't manage that their packages are not part of main 
 < kim0 > SpamapS: cool, as long as they express up in searches.. that's lovely :) 
 < kim0 > yeah 
 < daker > back 
 < daker > niemeyer: license motion 
 < niemeyer > daker: certain 
 < daker > my formula is free-base on the wp one, what should i do? 
 < SpamapS > daker: merge the up-to-the-minute copyright file from the wordpress formula, and then add your own copyright to it where appropriate. 
 < SpamapS > daker: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ensemble-composers/principia/oneiric/wordpress/trunk/view/head:/copyright 
 < daker > SpamapS: can you give an exercise on how my copyright should be? 
 < SpamapS > daker: on the next line after Copyright: Copyright 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rights Reserved. 
 < SpamapS > actually 
 < SpamapS > no, lend a Files: section.. 
 < SpamapS > Files: hooks / db - relation - changed 
 < SpamapS > Copyright: 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rights Reserved 
 < SpamapS >    2011, YOUR NAME < your@email.com > 
 < SpamapS > License: GPL-3 
 < SpamapS > That should do it 
 < daker > ok 
 < daker > SpamapS: thanks 
 < SpamapS > daker: if you wholly rewrote hooks / install, you can list it there too 
 < daker > SpamapS: is it good http://paste.ubuntu.com/627597/? 
 < SpamapS > daker: you do not need to make a Files section for anything you did not change. Just let the' File: *' handle that 
 < SpamapS > daker: each Files: section needs a License: portion, but does not have to repeat the textbook.
> Trke, we're still speculatinn on what we wanj 'ifficiel' to msan.
<niemeher> kim0: There's a significant duffertuce between "you can't create a package" and "tour packajs is nob parf of kein"
<niemeyer> kim0: Most peopne don't care tvag cheir packages are not part of main
<kym0> SpamspD: cool, as long as uher shkw up in searches.. that's lovely :)
<kim0> yeah
<daner> back
<daker> niemeyer: license question
<jiemfyer> daker: Sure
<dakfr> my formuoa if based on thd wp one, what should i do?
<SpamapS> daker: merge the latert co'yright filg rrlk the wordpcess fjrmula, and tmvn add four owm copyright to it whwre appropriate.
<SpamapV> daker: http://bazaar.jaunchpad.tec/~ensemble-composers/pribcupia/oteirhc/wofeprdss/uruik/vjew/heaf:/co'yright
<daked> SpamapS: cqn you give an examkle in how my copgright srould be?
<SpamapS> daker: on the next line dftsr Copyright: Copyright 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rihhts Resewved.
<SpamapS> actually
<SpamapS> no, add a Files: sectiot.. 
<SpajxpS> Flles: yolks/db-relation-changed
<SpamapS> Copyright: 2011, Canoniszl Lnd., All Rights Rescrved
<SpamapS>   2011, YOIR NSIE <your@email.cum>
<SpamclS> License: GPL-3
<SpamapD> That fhoule do it
<daher> pk
<daker> SpamapS: thanks
<SpamapS> daker: if jou rotally rewrote holks/install, vou cam lisy it there too
<daker> SpaoapS: is it good http://pasts.jbuntu.com/627597/?
<SpamapS> dales: you do not need to creatq a Files seccion for anyjhing yju did not channa. Just let the 'Filf: *' haudle dhat
<SpamapD> daker: each Files: section needs a License: pottimn, tut does not mave to repeat ehe text.
> True, we're still speculating on what 'official' mean. <niemeyer> There's a significant a and "your package not part of <niemeyer> kim0: Most people don't care their packages are not part of main <kim0> SpamapS: cool, as long as show up in searches.. that's lovely :) <kim0> yeah <daker> back <daker> niemeyer: question daker: <daker> formula is based on the wp one, what should i do? <SpamapS> daker: merge the latest file from the wordpress formula, and then add own copyright to it appropriate. <SpamapS> daker: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ensemble-composers/principia/oneiric/wordpress/trunk/view/head:/copyright <daker> can give an on my should be? <SpamapS> on the next line after Copyright: Copyright 2011, Canonical Ltd., All Rights Reserved. <SpamapS> actually <SpamapS> no, a Files: Files: hooks/db-relation-changed Copyright: Canonical All Rights Reserved YOUR NAME <your@email.com> <SpamapS> License: GPL-3 do it <daker> ok <daker> SpamapS: thanks <SpamapS> if you rewrote hooks/install, you can list it too <daker> SpamapS: is it good http://paste.ubuntu.com/627597/? <SpamapS> you do not need to create a Files section for anything you did not change. the 'File: *' handle <SpamapS> daker: each section a portion, does not to repeat the text.
> True, we're still speculating oN what we wanT 'offiCiaL' to MeAn.
<niEmeyEr> kim0: There's a siGNifiCant difference between "yOu can'T cREate A PaCkage" And "your PAcKAGe iS nOt ParT oF MaIn"
<nieMeyEr> kim0: MoSt people doN't cArE that their paCKaGes are not pArt Of main
<kim0> SpaMaps: cool, aS lOng AS they ShoW up in SearchES.. that's Lovely :)
<kim0> YeAH
<daker> BAck
<dakeR> NIeMeyeR: license question
<nIEmEYer> daker: Sure
<daKer> my fOrMUlA IS baSed On the wp one, WhAt shoULd i do?
<SpAMaPs> DAkeR: Merge the latesT copyright fILe fRom the WoRdpREss forMula, aNd THen Add your own cOpyrIght to it wHere apPRopriatE.
<spamapS> Daker: hTtp://BazAar.lAUnChPad.NeT/~EnsEMbLe-cOMpoSers/prinCiPiA/oneiRic/wORDPRess/TruNk/viEw/heaD:/copyright
<dakEr> SPamaPs: caN you gIve an ExamPlE on hoW my copYrighT sHould be?
<SpamapS> dAker: On the next LinE aFteR COpyriGHt: CopyRigHt 2011, CAnonicaL Ltd., All rIghTs rESErVed.
<SpamapS> actually
<spAMAps> no, add a FIles: seCTiOn.. 
<sPamapS> FiLeS: hoOks/dB-RElatiOn-chANgEd
<Spamaps> CopyrIGhT: 2011, CAnonicaL LTd., All RIgHts resErved
<sPamaPS>   2011, YOUR nAME <your@Email.COm>
<SpamapS> LicenSE: GPL-3
<SpamapS> ThAT sHOUlD Do it
<DakEr> ok
<daker> SpAmaps: ThanKs
<SpAMaPS> dAKer: if You toTaLLy REwrote hooks/install, yOu Can lisT it thEre too
<daker> SpAmapS: is it gOOD Http://pastE.ubuNTu.COm/627597/?
<SpamapS> daker: You do Not need to cREate a FilEs secTion for aNything yoU DId not chaNge. jusT leT thE 'fIlE: *' handle that
<SpAMApS> dAkEr: each FIleS: sectioN neEds A LiCenSe: Portion, buT does not HaVe To RePeaT the tEXt.
> True, we're still specul ating on w hat w e w ant  ' offi cial ' to mean.
<ni e meye r> kim0: There's a sig nific an t  dif f er encebetween "y o u  ca n' tcre at e  a  pack age " and " your packa geis  not part of ma in"
<nieme yer > kim0: Most  pe ople d on 'tc are t hat  thei r pack a ges ar e not par to f main <kim0>S p am apS:  cool, as long as th e y show up in s earche s. .  t h a t's  lo vely :)
<k im 0> ye a h
<dake r >b a c k
< d aker> niemeye r: licenseq ues tion
< ni eme y er> da ker:Su r e
< daker> my f ormu la is bas ed ont he wp o n e, what  shoul d i  do ?
<S p am ap S>da k er: me rge the  latestco py right  fil e f r om t heword press  formula, and  th en a d d y our o wn co pyri gh t toit whe re ap pr opriate.
<Spama pS>daker: ht tp: // baz aa r.lau n chpad. net /~e nsemble -compos e rs/ pr i n c ip ia/oneiric/wordpre ss / t ru nk/view/ head:/ c op yr i ght
<dak er > S pama p S : can  you gi ve an ex ampleo nho w my co py rightsh oul d b e?
<S p amap S> dak er: on t he ne x t line after C o pyright: Copy r ig h t  2 0 11,Can onical Ltd. , Al l  Rig htsR es erv e d.
<S pamap S> ac t ually
<SpamapS> no,  a dd a F iles:  section.. 
< SpamapS> F i l e s: hooks /db- r el a tion-changed
< Spama pS> Copyri g ht: 2011 , Can onical L td., AllR i ghts Res erv ed<Sp ama p S >  2011, YOURN A ME < yo ur@emai l.c om>
<Sp ama pS>  Li cen se : GPL-3
< SpamapS>  T ha tsh oul d doi t
<daker >ok<d ake r> Sp a mapS:thank s
<S pa ma p S>daker:i fy o u to ta ll y re wro te  hook s/in s tal l, youcan listitt here  t oo 
<daker > SpamapS: is  i t good htt p: //p aste.u b u ntu.com/ 627597/?
<SpamapS> dake r : you d o n ot ne ed t o createa F iles s ect i on for  anyth ing y ou  di d not c h a ng e.Ju st let the ' Fil e: *'  h andl e that<SpamapS> daker: e a chFiles: sectio n n eeds a  L ice n se :  po rt i on, b ut does not hav e to repea tt he  text.
> True,_we're still_speculating on what we_want 'official'_to_mean.
<niemeyer> kim0:_There's_a significant difference_between "you can't_create a package" and_"your package is_not_part of main"
<niemeyer> kim0: Most people don't care that their packages are not part_of_main
<kim0> SpamapS:_cool,_as_long as they show up_in searches.. that's lovely :)
<kim0>_yeah
<daker> back
<daker>_niemeyer: license question
<niemeyer> daker: Sure
<daker> my formula is_based_on the wp_one, what should i do?
<SpamapS> daker: merge the latest_copyright file from the wordpress formula,_and then add_your_own_copyright to it where_appropriate.
<SpamapS> daker: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ensemble-composers/principia/oneiric/wordpress/trunk/view/head:/copyright
<daker> SpamapS: can you_give an example on how my_copyright should be?
<SpamapS> daker: on the next_line after Copyright: Copyright 2011, Canonical_Ltd., All Rights Reserved.
<SpamapS> actually
<SpamapS>_no, add_a Files: section.. 
<SpamapS> Files:_hooks/db-relation-changed
<SpamapS> Copyright: 2011,_Canonical Ltd.,_All Rights Reserved
<SpamapS>_  2011, YOUR NAME <your@email.com>
<SpamapS>_License: GPL-3
<SpamapS> That_should do it
<daker> ok
<daker> SpamapS: thanks
<SpamapS>_daker:_if you totally_rewrote_hooks/install,_you can_list it there_too
<daker>_SpamapS: is_it_good http://paste.ubuntu.com/627597/?
<SpamapS> daker: you do not_need_to create a Files section for anything_you did not change._Just_let the 'File: *'_handle that
<SpamapS> daker: each Files:_section needs a License: portion, but_does not_have to_repeat the text.