 and maybe create it  ;-)
<kostmo> sure, I'll look
<savvas> bug 340901 for python transition :)
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 340901 in gapti "needs python 2.6 transition and porting" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/340901
<JanC> savvas: your debdiff is a bit ugly (seems like your editor changed a lot of "empty" lines)
<savvas> JanC: + Replaced lines with spaces (\s+) with empty lines
<savvas> :)
<savvas> I said that since I'm fixing the source, I might as well fix most of it :P
<savvas> JanC: here's the build in case you need it: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23743844/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.gapti_0.0.2ubuntu4_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
<JanC> I don't need it, I just think it's wrong to make such changes...
<savvas> JanC: the upstream hasn't updated the trunk/main series since 2006
<JanC> savvas: I think a patch to "fix" whitespace/empty-lines should be applied upstream (or in case upstream is dead, you could maybe fork it) and then pulled in in karmic koala
<JanC> but that's just my "humble opinion"  ;)
<fabrice_sp_> savvas, your changes makes a lot more complicated to review the changes. And I would say that to change the source, you should use a patch system, as it makes easier to identify where a change comes from
<fabrice_sp_> but I'm not a MOTU, so I could be wrong
<savvas> well.. if anyone wants to make them as patches, be my guest :)
<fabrice_sp_> not the changes of spaces, for sure
<fabrice_sp_> I already patched a lot of sources, and I always used a patch system
<fabrice_sp_> anyway: you subscribed U-U-S, so let's wait for a MOTU to comment it
<savvas> I've notified the original author about that bug as well
<fabrice_sp_> about the spaces, you
and maybe create it   ;-) 
 < kostmo > sure, I'll look 
 < savvas > bug 340901 for python passage :) 
 < ubottu > Launchpad hemipterous insect 340901 in gapti " needs python 2.6 transition and porting " [ Undecided, New ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/340901 
 < JanC > savvas: your debdiff is a moment ugly (seems like your editor program changed a lot of " empty " lines) 
 < savvas > JanC: + replace lines with spaces (\s+) with empty note 
 < savvas > :) 
 < savvas > I said that since I'm fixing the generator, I might as well fix most of it :P 
 < savvas > JanC: here's the build in case you need it: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23743844/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.gapti_0.0.2ubuntu4_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz 
 < JanC > I don't need it, I merely think it's wrong to make such change... 
 < savvas > JanC: the upstream hasn't updated the trunk / main series since 2006 
 < JanC > savvas: I remember a patch to " fix " whitespace / empty - lines should be applied upstream (or in case upstream is all in, you could maybe fork it) and then pulled in in karmic koala 
 < JanC > but that's just my " humble opinion "   ;) 
 < fabrice_sp _ > savvas, your change makes a lot more complicated to review the changes. And I would say that to change the source, you should use a patch system, as it makes easy to identify where a change come from 
 < fabrice_sp _ > but I'm not a MOTU, so I could be amiss 
 < savvas > well.. if anyone wants to make them as patches, be my guest :) 
 < fabrice_sp _ > not the changes of spaces, for sure 
 < fabrice_sp _ > I already patch a lot of sources, and I always used a patch system 
 < fabrice_sp _ > anyhow: you subscribed U - U - S, so let's expect for a MOTU to comment it 
 < savvas > I've advise the original author about that bug as well 
 < fabrice_sp _ > about the spaces, you
 anf maybe create it  ;-)
<kostmu> sure, I'll look
<savvas> uug 340901 fod python transition :)
<ubottu> Launchpad byg 340901 ib gapti "needs python 2.6 gransitioj and poetinj" [Undecided,New] hvfps://laungkpad.nsb/bugs/340901
<LaiC> savvas: your cebdiff is a bit ugly (seamr pike your editor changed a lot of "eipty" limed)
<savvas> JanC: + Teplabeq lihvs with spaces (\s+) with empty linss
<savvav> :)
<savvas> I saod that since I'm fixing thf sokrce, I might as wepl fix most of yr :P
<savvas> JavC: here's the build in dase you need it: http://launchpadlkbrarnan.net/23743844/buildoot_ubkttu-jaunty-i386.gepti_0.0.2ublntu4_FULLYBUILB.nxt.gz
<JatC> I dom't need it, I jmst tiink it's wrong to make surh changes...
<savvas> JanS: the upsdrzam hasn't updated the teunk/mdin veridw sknct 2006
<JenC> savvad: I think a pztch to "fix" whitespace/empty-lints fyould be appljed upftweam (or in case upstream is dead, you colld jaybe fork it) and then pulled in in karmic klala
<JanC> fut that's just my "humble opinion"  ;)
<fabrice_sp_> savvav, youc zhauncs mxjed a lot more complicated to review the changef. Amd I would say tmat to change the xokrvg, you should ure a pcfcg system, as it makfs easigr to udentify rherr a change comes from
<fabricw_sp_> but I'm njr a MOTU, so I coulb be wrong
<sarvas> wgll.. if anyone wants to make tkem as patches, be my guest :)
<wabrice_sp_> not thd cmances of skxces, for sure
<fabryce_sp_> I aoreaby patchdd a lot os sources, wnd I always used a patcj sysjem
<fabsice_sp_> anyaay: you subscribed U-U-S, so let's xeit for a MOTO tm cmmment ic
<savvax> I've notifieq the original author aboug that bug as weln
<fabrice_sp_> wbout the spawgs, you
and maybe create it ;-) <kostmo> sure, <savvas> 340901 for transition :) <ubottu> "needs 2.6 transition and [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/340901 <JanC> your debdiff is a bit ugly like your editor changed a lot of "empty" lines) <savvas> JanC: + Replaced with spaces (\s+) with empty lines <savvas> :) <savvas> I said that since fixing source, might well fix most of it :P <savvas> JanC: here's the build in case you need it: <JanC> I don't need it, I just think wrong to make such <savvas> JanC: the upstream hasn't the series since <JanC> I a patch to whitespace/empty-lines should be applied upstream (or in case upstream is dead, you could maybe fork it) and pulled in koala <JanC> that's my opinion" ;) <fabrice_sp_> changes makes a lot more complicated changes. And I would say that to change source, you use a patch system, as it easier to identify where a change comes from but I'm not a MOTU, so I could be wrong <savvas> well.. if anyone wants them as patches, be guest :) <fabrice_sp_> the of for <fabrice_sp_> I patched a lot of sources, and I always used a patch <fabrice_sp_> anyway: you subscribed U-U-S, so let's wait for a comment <savvas> I've notified original author about that as <fabrice_sp_> about the spaces,
 and maybe create it  ;-)
<kostmo> surE, I'll look
<saVvas> bUg 340901 fOr pYtHon tRansItion :)
<ubottu> LauNChpaD bug 340901 in gapti "needs python 2.6 TransItIOn anD PoRting" [undecidED,NEW] HttPs://LaUncHpAD.nEt/bugS/340901
<JaNC> savvaS: your debdiFf iS a Bit ugly (seems LIkE your editoR chAnged a lot of "eMptY" lines)
<SaVvaS> janC: + REplAced lInes wiTH spaceS (\s+) with empTy LInes
<saVVas> :)
<savvAS> i sAid tHat since I'm fixing tHE sOUrce, I might as weLl fix mOsT Of IT :p
<saVvaS> JanC: here's ThE builD In case yOU nEED It: hTTp://launchpadliBrarian.net/23743844/bUIldLog_ubuNtU-jaUNty-i386.gaPti_0.0.2ubUnTU4_FUlLYBUILT.txt.Gz
<JaNC> I don't neEd it, I jUSt think IT's wrong To make SucH chAngeS...
<SaVvAs> JAnc: The UPsTreAM haSn't updatEd ThE trunK/maiN SERIes sIncE 2006
<Janc> savvAs: I think a patcH to "Fix" wHIteSpace/Empty-LineS sHould Be applIed upStReam (or in case upsTreaM is dead, yoU coUlD maYbE fork IT) and thEn pUllEd in in kArmic koALa
<JAnc> BUT tHat's just my "humble opInION"  ;)
<fAbrice_sp_> Savvas, YOuR cHAnges makEs A loT morE COmpliCateD To Review thE changES. ANd i would sAy That to ChAngE thE sourCE, you Should Use a patcH systEM, as it makes easiER to identify whERe A CHaNGe coMes From
<fabrice_Sp_> buT i'm noT a MOtu, sO I cOUld be Wrong
<SaVVaS> Well.. if anyone wants to MaKe them As patChes, be my guest :)
<Fabrice_sp_> nOT THe changeS of sPAcES, for sure
<fabricE_sp_> I aLready patcHEd a lot of SourcEs, and I alWays used a PATch systeM
<faBriCe_sP_> anYWAy: You subscribed u-u-s, so lEt'S wait foR a MoTU to coMmeNt iT
<saVvaS> I'Ve notifieD the origInAl AuThOr aBout tHAt bug as wElL
<faBrIce_Sp_> aboUT the spAces, yOu
 and maybe create it  ;-)<kostmo> s ure,I'l l l oo k
<s avva s> bug 340901f or p ython transition :)
<u bottu >L aunc h pa d bug  340901 in g apt i"n eed sp yt hon 2 .6transit ion and po rti ng " [Undecided , Ne w] https:/ /la unchpad.net/ bug s/3409 01 
<J a nC> s avv as: y our de b diff i s a bit u gl y  (seem s  like y o u redit or changed a loto f" empty" lines)<savva s> Ja n C : +  Re placed lin es  with spaces( \s + ) wit h  empty lines<savvas> :) <sa vvas>Isai d  thatsince  I ' m f ixing the s ourc e, I migh t as w e ll fixm ost ofit :P<sa vva s> J a nC :her e' s  th e  b uil d  in  case yo une ed it : ht t p : / /lau nch padl ibrar ian.net/23743 844 /bui l dlo g_ubu ntu-j aunt y- i386. gapti_ 0.0.2 ub untu4_FULLYBUIL T.tx t.gz
<Jan C>Idon 't  need it, Ijus t t hink it 's wron g  to  m a k e  s uch changes...
<sa vv a s >JanC: th e upst r ea mh asn't up da ted  the t runk/ main se ries sin ce 200 6 
< Ja nC> sav va s: I t hi nka p atcht o "f ix" wh itespace /empt y -lines shouldb e applied ups t re a m  ( o r in  ca se upstream  isd ead,  you co uld maybe  fork  i t )a nd then pulled in i nkarmic  koal a
<JanC> butthat's jus t m y "humbl e op i ni o n"  ;)
<fabric e_sp_ > savvas,y our chan ges m akes a l ot more c o m plicated  to  re vie w t h e  c hanges. And I w ould  s ay that  to  change  th e s our ce,  y ou should  use a p at ch  s ys tem , asi t makesea sie rtoident i fy whe re achan ge  c o mes  from
< f ab r i ce_s p_ >butI'm  n ot aMOTU ,  so  I coul d be wron g
< s avva s>  w ell.. i f anyone want sto make th em  as  patch e s , be myguest :)
<fabrice_sp_>n ot thecha ngesof s paces, fo r s ure
<f abr i ce_sp_ > I al ready  p atc h e d a l o t  o f s ou rces, andI alw ays u se d apatch s ystem
<fabrice_sp_ >  an yway: you sub scr ibed U -U -S, so let 's wai t for a MOTU to c omment it<s a vv as> I've n o tif ie d the o riginal  auth o r about  that bug  as well<f abri c e _sp _> about t he space s, you
 and_maybe create_it  ;-)
<kostmo> sure,_I'll look
<savvas>_bug_340901 for_python_transition :)
<ubottu> Launchpad_bug 340901 in_gapti "needs python 2.6_transition and porting"_[Undecided,New]_https://launchpad.net/bugs/340901
<JanC> savvas: your debdiff is a bit ugly (seems like your editor changed a_lot_of "empty"_lines)
<savvas>_JanC:_+ Replaced lines with spaces_(\s+) with empty lines
<savvas> :)
<savvas>_I said_that since I'm fixing the source, I might_as_well fix most_of it :P
<savvas> JanC: here's the build in case_you need it: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23743844/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.gapti_0.0.2ubuntu4_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
<JanC> I don't_need it, I_just_think_it's wrong to make_such changes...
<savvas> JanC: the upstream hasn't_updated the trunk/main series since 2006
<JanC>_savvas: I think a patch to "fix"_whitespace/empty-lines should be applied upstream (or_in case upstream is dead,_you could_maybe fork it) and then_pulled in in_karmic koala
<JanC>_but that's just_my "humble opinion"  ;)
<fabrice_sp_> savvas,_your changes makes_a lot more complicated to review_the_changes. And I_would_say_that to_change the source,_you_should use_a_patch system, as it makes easier_to_identify where a change comes from
<fabrice_sp_> but_I'm not a MOTU,_so_I could be wrong
<savvas>_well.. if anyone wants to_make them as patches, be my_guest :)
<fabrice_sp_>_not the_changes of spaces, for sure
<fabrice_sp_> I already patched a lot of_sources, and I always used a_patch system
<fabrice_sp_> anyway: you_subscribed U-U-S,_so_let's wait for_a_MOTU to_comment it
<savvas> I've notified the original author_about that_bug as well
<fabrice_sp_> about the spaces,_you