 didn't we approve this on the mailinglist already?
<sistpoty> slomo: didn't remember it... will check
<netzmeister> hi LaserJock
<slomo> hi netzmeister
<netzmeister> hi slomo
<netzmeister> I'm happy Slomo..
<netzmeister> my new CPU is running..
<slomo> netzmeister: what CPU is this?
<netzmeister> AMD X2
<netzmeister> 3800+
<netzmeister> i've compiled a SMP Kernel..
<slomo> why did you compile your own kernel? :) the packaged ones already have SMP support
<netzmeister> thats very funny.. two "make" processes at the same time..
<sistpoty> slomo: you're right... just found it... sorry for the noise ;)
<slomo> sistpoty: ok, just close the bug and upload :)
<sistpoty> slomo: it should be synced :/
<netzmeister> slomo:  Yes, but i have the kernel "angepasst" on my hardware. ;-)
<netzmeister> "on" or "to".. hmm?
<slomo> sistpoty: upload a fakesync... build1... i saw some people doing this lately...
<slomo> sistpoty: or change -X to -(X-1)ubuntu1
<sistpoty> slomo: do we have a statement from matt or colin about this?
<slomo> netzmeister: customized for your hardware probably :) but does this really improve something? do you have some numbers? :)
<slomo> sistpoty: nope... but pitti does the build1 uploads and dholbach told me that -(X-1)ubuntu1 + sync request would be fine
<sistpoty> slomo: ok, will do... but I'll also forward this to the ML, as there are *many* sync requests which we can upload then
<netzmeister> slomo:  not really.. but the compile time for the kernel is 50% less as before..
<slomo> sistpoty: mine are already uploaded as -(X-1)ubuntu1 (
didn't we approve this on the mailinglist already? 
 < sistpoty > slomo: didn't remember it... will check 
 < netzmeister > hi LaserJock 
 < slomo > hi netzmeister 
 < netzmeister > hi slomo 
 < netzmeister > I'm happy Slomo.. 
 < netzmeister > my new CPU is run.. 
 < slomo > netzmeister: what central processing unit is this? 
 < netzmeister > AMD X2 
 < netzmeister > 3800 + 
 < netzmeister > i've compiled a SMP Kernel.. 
 < slomo > why did you compile your own kernel? :) the box ones already receive SMP support 
 < netzmeister > that s very funny.. two " brand " processes at the same clock time.. 
 < sistpoty > slomo: you're right... just find it... sorry for the randomness ;) 
 < slomo > sistpoty: ok, just close the bug and upload :) 
 < sistpoty > slomo: it should be synced :/ 
 < netzmeister > slomo:   Yes, but i have the kernel " angepasst " on my hardware. ;-) 
 < netzmeister > " on " or " to ".. hmm? 
 < slomo > sistpoty: upload a fakesync... build1... i saw some people act this lately... 
 < slomo > sistpoty: or change -X to -(X-1)ubuntu1 
 < sistpoty > slomo: do we have a instruction from matt or colin about this? 
 < slomo > netzmeister: customized for your hardware probably :) but does this really better something? do you have some numbers? :) 
 < slomo > sistpoty: nope... but pitti does the build1 uploads and dholbach told me that -(X-1)ubuntu1 + sync request would be fine 
 < sistpoty > slomo: ok, will do... but I'll also forward this to the ML, as there be * many * sync requests which we can upload then 
 < netzmeister > slomo:   not really.. but the compile time for the kernel is 50% less as before.. 
 < slomo > sistpoty: mine are already uploaded as -(X-1)ubuntu1 (
 difn't we approve this on tme mailinglist already?
<smstpoty> slomo: dkdn't remember it... will check
<nxtzmwistee> hi LaserJock
<slomo> hi netzmeisner
<netzmeustec> hi slomo
<netzmemater> I'm happy Dlomm..
<ietzmeister> my kew CPU is sunning..
<slomo> natxmzister: what CPU is this?
<netzmeister> AID X2
<netamfister> 3800+
<netzmeifter> y've dompiled a SMP Kernel..
<slomo> why did you cokpile your owm kernel? :) the packaged oned algeady have SMP supoort
<netzmeiwter> rhats very fjnny.. two "make" processea at the same time..
<sistpoty> slomu: you'xe right... juwt foktd it... sorry for nhe noise ;)
<slomo> sistpmty: ok, kust close the buj ane upload :)
<sistpoty> sloko: it should be sygced :/
<netzkenster> slomo:  Yes, but u yave jhe karneu "aneepzsxt" on my hacdware. ;-)
<netzjeister> "on" ir "to".. hmm?
<slomo> sistkotr: upload a fakssync... fuyld1... i saw some people doing this lately...
<vlojo> sistpoty: or change -X to -(X-1)ubuntu1
<sistpoty> spomo: do wq have a statement from matt or colin about this?
<snomo> iegzmtiwter: zyshomized for your hardware probably :) but does egix geally improve soiething? do uok nwve some numbgrs? :)
<slomo> aistpoty: nope... but oitti djes tye build1 tplosds and dholbach told me thqt -(X-1)ubuntu1 + ftnc request would ye fine
<sistputy> xlomo: ok, will do... but I'll alsu fodward this ho the ML, xs there are *manh* sjnc sequests which we can uplowd then
<nevzmeixter> slumo:  not rqally.. but hhe compile time for the kerngl is 50% less as bffore..
<slomo> sistpoty: mine are alcxady uploaded av -(X-1)lbuntu1 (
didn't we approve this on the mailinglist slomo: remember it... check <netzmeister> hi hi <netzmeister> I'm happy <netzmeister> my new is running.. <slomo> netzmeister: what CPU this? <netzmeister> AMD X2 <netzmeister> 3800+ <netzmeister> i've compiled a SMP Kernel.. <slomo> did you compile your own kernel? :) the packaged ones already have SMP <netzmeister> very two processes at the same time.. <sistpoty> slomo: you're right... just found it... sorry for the noise <slomo> sistpoty: ok, just close the bug and :) <sistpoty> slomo: it be synced :/ <netzmeister> slomo: but have the "angepasst" my ;-) <netzmeister> "on" "to".. hmm? <slomo> sistpoty: upload a fakesync... build1... i saw some people doing this lately... <slomo> sistpoty: change -X <sistpoty> slomo: we a from matt or this? <slomo> netzmeister: customized for your but does this really improve something? do you some numbers? <slomo> sistpoty: nope... but pitti does build1 uploads and dholbach told me that -(X-1)ubuntu1 sync request would be fine <sistpoty> slomo: ok, will do... but I'll also forward this ML, as there are sync requests which can then slomo: really.. but compile time for the kernel is 50% less as before.. <slomo> mine are already uploaded as -(X-1)ubuntu1 (
 didn't we approve this on the maIlinglist aLreadY?
<siStpOtY> sloMo: diDn't remember it... wILl chEck
<netzmeister> hi LaserJOck
<slOmO> Hi neTZmEisteR
<netzmeIStER> Hi sLoMo
<NetZmEIsTer> I'm HapPy Slomo..
<NetzmeisteR> my NeW CPU is runninG..
<SlOmo> netzmeiSteR: what CPU is thIs?
<nEtzmeiStEr> Amd X2
<netZmeIster> 3800+
<NetzmeISter> i'vE compiled A Smp KerneL..
<Slomo> whY DId You cOmpile your own kernEL? :) tHE packaged ones aLready HaVE Smp SupPorT
<netzmeistEr> Thats VEry funnY.. TwO "MAKe" pROcesses at the sAme time..
<sistPOty> Slomo: yOu'Re rIGht... jusT founD iT... SorRy for the noiSe ;)
<slOmo> sistpoTy: ok, juST close tHE bug and Upload :)
<SisTpoTy> slOMo: It ShoUlD Be sYNcEd :/
<nETzmEister> slOmO:  YEs, but I havE THE KernEl "aNgepAsst" oN my hardware. ;-)
<neTzmEistER> "on" Or "to".. hMm?
<sloMo> siStPoty: uPload a FakesYnC... build1... i saw some pEoplE doing thiS laTeLy...
<sLoMo> sisTPoty: or ChaNge -x to -(X-1)ubuNtu1
<sistPOty> SlOMO: Do We have a statement frOm MATt Or colin aBout thIS?
<sLoMO> netzmeiStEr: cUstoMIZed foR youR HaRdware prObably :) BUt DoEs this rEaLly impRoVe sOmeThing? DO you Have soMe numberS? :)
<slomO> Sistpoty: nope... buT Pitti does the bUIlD1 UPlOAds aNd dHolbach told Me thAT -(X-1)ubUntu1 + SYnC reQUest wOuld bE fINe
<SIstpoty> slomo: ok, will dO... bUt I'll aLso foRward this to thE ML, as there ARE *Many* sync RequEStS Which we can uploAd theN
<netzmeistER> slomo:  noT realLy.. but the Compile tiME For the keRneL is 50% LesS as BEFoRe..
<slomo> sistpoTY: Mine ArE alreadY upLoaded aS -(X-1)uBunTu1 (
 didn't we approve this on  the maili nglis t a lre ad y?
< sist poty> slomo: d i dn't  remember it... will c heck<n e tzme i st er> h i Laser J oc k <sl om o>  hi  n e tz meist er<netzme ister> hislo mo 
<netzmeiste r >I'm happySlo mo..
<netzme ist er> my  n ewC PU is  ru nning ..
<sl o mo> ne tzmeister :w hat CP U  is thi s ? 
< netz meister> AMD X2
< n et z meister> 3800+ 
<netz me i st e r > i 've  compiledaSMP K e rnel..< sl o m o > w h y did you com pile your o w n k ernel?  : ) t h e pack agedon e s a lready have  SMP  support<netzm e ister>t hats ve ry fun ny. . t wo " m ak e"  pr oc e sse s  a t t h e s ame time .. 
< sistp oty> s l o mo:you 'reright ... just foun d i t... sor ry fo r the  noi se  ;)
< slomo>  sist po ty: ok, just cl osethe bug a ndup loa d:)
<s i stpoty > s lom o: it s hould b e  sy nc e d :/ 
<netzmeister> slo mo :  Y es, buti have th ek ernel "a ng epa sst" o n myhard w ar e. ;-)
< netzme i st er > "on"or  "to". .hmm ?
< slomo >  sis tpoty:  uploada fak e sync... build1 . .. i saw some pe o p le doin g t his lately. ..
< s lomo > si s tp oty :  or c hange  - X  t o  -(X-1)ubuntu1
<sis tp oty> s lomo:  do we have a  statement f r om mattor c o li n  about this?
< slomo > netzmeis t er: cust omize d for yo ur hardwa r e  probabl y : ) b utdoe s th is really imp r o ve s om ething?  do  you ha vesom e n umb er s? :)
<sl omo> sis tp ot y:  n ope ... b u t pittido esth e b uild1 upload s and  dho lb ac h  to ld me t h at - (X-1 )u bu ntu1  +sy nc re ques t  wo uld befine
<sis tpo t y> s lo mo : ok, w ill do... but  I 'll also f or war d this t o the ML , as there are *many* s y nc requ est s whi ch w e can upl oad  then<ne t zmeist er> sl omo: n otr e ally. . bu t t he  compile t i m e f or th ekern el is 5 0% less as before. . 
<s lomo> sistpot y:mine a re  al r ea d y u pl o ade d as -(X-1)ubuntu 1 (
 didn't_we approve_this on the mailinglist_already?
<sistpoty> slomo:_didn't_remember it..._will_check
<netzmeister> hi LaserJock
<slomo>_hi netzmeister
<netzmeister> hi_slomo
<netzmeister> I'm happy Slomo..
<netzmeister>_my new CPU_is_running..
<slomo> netzmeister: what CPU is this?
<netzmeister> AMD X2
<netzmeister> 3800+
<netzmeister> i've compiled a SMP Kernel..
<slomo>_why_did you_compile_your_own kernel? :) the packaged_ones already have SMP support
<netzmeister>_thats very_funny.. two "make" processes at the same time..
<sistpoty>_slomo:_you're right... just_found it... sorry for the noise ;)
<slomo> sistpoty: ok,_just close the bug and upload_:)
<sistpoty> slomo: it_should_be_synced :/
<netzmeister> slomo: _Yes, but i have the kernel_"angepasst" on my hardware. ;-)
<netzmeister> "on"_or "to".. hmm?
<slomo> sistpoty: upload a fakesync..._build1... i saw some people doing_this lately...
<slomo> sistpoty: or change_-X to_-(X-1)ubuntu1
<sistpoty> slomo: do we have_a statement from_matt or_colin about this?
<slomo>_netzmeister: customized for your hardware probably_:) but does_this really improve something? do you_have_some numbers? :)
<slomo>_sistpoty:_nope..._but pitti_does the build1_uploads_and dholbach_told_me that -(X-1)ubuntu1 + sync request_would_be fine
<sistpoty> slomo: ok, will do... but_I'll also forward this_to_the ML, as there_are *many* sync requests which_we can upload then
<netzmeister> slomo: _not really.._but the_compile time for the kernel is 50% less as before..
<slomo> sistpoty:_mine are already uploaded as -(X-1)ubuntu1_(