<directhex> DktrKranz, xsp is in univsre, and it's okay for xsp to have 1.0 deps (xsp2 from the same course package is the 2.0 version)
<cjwatson> if the tarball has changed but has the same version number, then you must artificially rename it
<c_korn> DktrKranz: I am in contact with Sylvestre. will notify him.
<DktrKranz> directhex, cool then
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: like?
<cjwatson> you cannot have two objects with the same file name but different contents in the same archive
<cjwatson> pmjdebruijn: up to you
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: "the same archive" is intrepid and jaunty stuff mixed then?
<cjwatson> yes.
<pmjdebruijn> ugh
<DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, foo_0.1+repack.orig.tar.gz could go
<cjwatson> there's a single pool
<pmjdebruijn> hmmm
<cjwatson> which will then mean that your package is versioned 0.1+repack-0ubuntu1 or whatever
<pmjdebruijn> oh well, too bad for folks still on Intrepid then
<cjwatson> why *not* rename it?
<cjwatson> it's the right thing to do
<pmjdebruijn> is it?
<directhex> the root question here is, why do you WANT different orig with the same version?
 * cjwatson -> out
<DktrKranz> nhandler, bug 266919, is it managed using Rosetta? I can't find it in package list.
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 266919 in knoda "knoda italian translation" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/266919
<slytherin> when specifying CFLAGS, is order of the flags important?
<pmjdebruijn> directhex: I'm going to check the differences
<pmjdebruijn> directhex: the base directory seems to be the only difference, then I'll stick with the old tarball
<pmjdebruijn> won't
< directhex > DktrKranz, xsp is in univsre, and it's okay for xsp to have 1.0 deps (xsp2 from the same course software is the 2.0 interpretation) 
 < cjwatson > if the tarball has changed but has the like version issue, then you must artificially rename it 
 < c_korn > DktrKranz: I am in contact with Sylvestre. will notify him. 
 < DktrKranz > directhex, cool then 
 < pmjdebruijn > cjwatson: like? 
 < cjwatson > you cannot hold two objects with the same file name but unlike content in the same archive 
 < cjwatson > pmjdebruijn: up to you 
 < pmjdebruijn > cjwatson: " the like archive " is intrepid and jaunty stuff mixed then? 
 < cjwatson > yes. 
 < pmjdebruijn > ugh 
 < DktrKranz > pmjdebruijn, foo_0.1+repack.orig.tar.gz could run 
 < cjwatson > there's a single pool 
 < pmjdebruijn > hmmm 
 < cjwatson > which will then mean that your software is versioned 0.1+repack-0ubuntu1 or whatever 
 < pmjdebruijn > oh well, too bad for folks even on Intrepid then 
 < cjwatson > why * not * rename it? 
 < cjwatson > it's the right thing to suffice 
 < pmjdebruijn > is it? 
 < directhex > the root doubt here is, why do you WANT different orig with the same version? 
  * cjwatson - > out 
 < DktrKranz > nhandler, bug 266919, is it managed use Rosetta? I can't find it in package list. 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 266919 in knoda " knoda italian translation " [ open, Invalid ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/266919 
 < slytherin > when specifying CFLAGS, is order of the flags important? 
 < pmjdebruijn > directhex: I'm going to check the differences 
 < pmjdebruijn > directhex: the base directory seems to be the only deviation, then I'll stick with the old tarball 
 < pmjdebruijn > won't
<dirfcthex> DktrKranz, xsp is ln univsre, and ij's okay hor xsp to have 1.0 deps (xsp2 from the same coucse packate is the 2.0 version)
<cjwagson> if tje tarbaol hes changed but hea the same veddion iumber, then you must artixicially renama kt
<e_korn> DktrKranz: I am in contact with Sylvesyrf. will notify rim.
<DlerKrznz> directhex, cool then
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatsmn: like?
<cjwatspn> you cannot have two objfcts with the same filf name but eiffqeent contentr in the same archive
<cnwatson> pmjdebruijn: up to you
<pmgdebrbijn> cjwatsin: "thf same archite" is pntrepid and msunty vtuff moxed then?
<cjwatxon> yew.
<pmjdebruijn> ugh
<DktrKcanz> pmjdebruijn, foo_0.1+tepack.orig.dax.gz could go
<cjwatson> rhwre's d sitgle poou
<pmndxbrhijn> hlmm
<rjwatson> whjch will thwn mean that your pschqge is versiohed 0.1+re[ask-0ubuntu1 or whatever
<pmjdebruijn> oh well, tok bad for folks still ob Intrepid then
<cjwatsln> why *noe* rename it?
<cjwatson> it's the right thing to do
<pmjdabruion> is ib?
<dirdxtjex> the root question here is, why do you WANT sigfvrent orig with tme same version?
 * ckwwtxjn -> out
<DktrKrxnz> nhchdmer, bug 266919, is it manwged usyng Risetta? I san't find it in package list.
<ubortu> Launchpab byg 266919 in knoda "knoda italian trcnslatoon" [Umdecided,Invalid] https://labnchpas.net/bugs/266919
<slyhherin> whsv specifying CFLXGS, iv order of the flags imporeant?
<pmjdeuruiju> directfex: O'm goigg to checn the differences
<pmjdebrkijn> birecdhex: the bwse directory seems to be the oiky differencg, tven I'll stiek witm the old tarbajl
<pmjdebruijn> con't
<directhex> DktrKranz, xsp is in univsre, and for to have deps (xsp2 from the version) <cjwatson> if tarball has changed has the same version number, then must artificially rename it <c_korn> DktrKranz: I am in contact with Sylvestre. will him. <DktrKranz> directhex, cool then <pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: like? <cjwatson> you cannot have two with same name different contents in the same archive <cjwatson> pmjdebruijn: up to you <pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: "the same archive" intrepid and jaunty stuff mixed then? <cjwatson> yes. ugh <DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, foo_0.1+repack.orig.tar.gz go <cjwatson> there's a single <pmjdebruijn> <cjwatson> which then that package is versioned or whatever <pmjdebruijn> oh well, too bad for folks still on Intrepid then <cjwatson> why *not* rename <cjwatson> it's thing to <pmjdebruijn> it? the root question why do you WANT different orig version? * cjwatson -> out <DktrKranz> nhandler, bug is it using Rosetta? I can't find it package list. <ubottu> Launchpad bug 266919 in knoda italian translation" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/266919 <slytherin> when specifying CFLAGS, is order of the flags important? <pmjdebruijn> going to check the <pmjdebruijn> directhex: the directory to the difference, then stick with the old tarball <pmjdebruijn> won't
<directhex> DktrKranz, xsp is in Univsre, and It's okAy fOr xSp To haVe 1.0 dePs (xsp2 from the saME couRse package is the 2.0 version)
<CjwatSoN> If thE TaRball Has chanGEd BUT haS tHe SamE vERsIon nuMbeR, then yoU must artifIciAlLy rename it
<c_kORn> dktrKranz: I Am iN contact with sylVestre. WiLl nOTify hIm.
<DKtrKrAnz> dirECthex, cOol then
<pmJdEBruijn> CJwatson: LIKe?
<CjwaTson> you cannot have TWo OBjects with the sAme filE nAMe BUT diFfeRent contenTs In the SAme archIVe
<CJWAtsON> pmjdebruijn: uP to you
<pmjdeBRuiJn> cjwaTsOn: "tHE same aRchivE" iS IntRepid and jauNty sTuff mixed Then?
<cjWAtson> yeS.
<PmjdebrUijn> ugH
<DkTrKRanz> PMjDeBruIjN, Foo_0.1+REpAck.ORig.Tar.gz couLd Go
<CjwatSon> tHERE'S a siNglE pooL
<pmjdEbruijn> hmmm
<cjWatSon> wHIch Will tHen meAn thAt Your pAckage Is verSiOned 0.1+repack-0ubuntU1 or wHatever
<pmJdeBrUijN> oH well, TOo bad fOr fOlkS still oN IntrepID thEn
<CJWAtSon> why *not* rename it?
<cJwATSoN> it's the rIght thINg To DO
<pmjdebrUiJn> iS it?
<dIREctheX> the ROoT questioN here iS, WhY dO you WANt dIffereNt OriG wiTh the SAme vErsion?
 * Cjwatson -> Out
<DkTRKranz> nhandler, BUg 266919, is it managed USiNG roSEtta? i caN't find it in pAckaGE lisT.
<uboTTu> lauNChpad Bug 266919 in KnODa "KNoda italian translatIoN" [UndecIded,INvalid] https://laUnchpad.net/BUGS/266919
<slytherIn> whEN sPEcifying CFLAGS, Is ordEr of the flaGS importaNt?
<pmjDebruijn> Directhex: i'M Going to cHecK thE diFfeRENcEs
<pmjdebruijn> DIRectHeX: the basE diRectory SeeMs tO be The OnLy differeNce, then I'Ll StIcK wIth The olD Tarball
<pMjDebRuIjn> Won't
<directhex> DktrKranz, xsp  is in uni vsre,  an d i t' s ok ay f or xsp to have 1.0deps (xsp2 from the sa me co ur s e pa c ka ge is  the 2. 0  v e r sio n) 
< cjw at s on > ifthe  tarbal l has chan ged  b ut has the s a me  version n umb er, then you  mu st art if ici a lly r ena me it 
<c_ko r n> Dkt rKranz: I  a m  in co n tact wi t h  S ylve stre. will notify hi m .
<DktrKranz>direct he x ,c o olthe n
<pmjdebr ui jn> c j watson: li k e ? 
<c j watson> you c annot havet woobject swit h  the s ame f il e  na me but diff eren t content s in t h e samea rchive<cjwat son > p mjde b ru ij n:up toy ou 
<p m jde bruijn>cj wa tson:  "th e s a me a rch ive"  is i ntrepid and j aun ty s t uff  mixe d the n?
< cj watso n> yes .
<pm jd ebruijn> ugh
<D ktrK ranz> pmj deb ru ijn ,foo_0 . 1+repa ck. ori g.tar.g z could go<c j w a ts on> there's a sing le p oo l
<pmjde bruijn >  h mm m 
<cjwats on > w hich w ill t henm ea n that y our pa c ka ge  is ver si oned 0 .1 +re pac k-0ub u ntu1  or wh atever
< pmjde b ruijn> oh well ,  too bad forf ol k s  s t illonIntrepid th en
< c jwat son> wh y * n ot* r ename  i t ?< cjwatson> it's theri ght th ing t o do
<pmjdebr uijn> is i t ? <directh ex>t he root questionhereis, why do you WANT  diff erent or ig with t h e  same ve rsi on? 
 *  cj w a ts on -> out
<Dk t r Kran z>  nhandl er,  bug 26 691 9,isitma naged usi ng Roset ta ?Ica n't  find it in pa ck age  l ist .
<ub o ttu> L aunch padbu g2 669 19 in k n od a "kno da  i tali antr ansla tion "  [U ndecide d,Invalid ] h t tps: // la unchpad .net/bugs/266 91 9
<slyther in > w hen sp e c ifying C FLAGS, is order of thef lags im por tant? 
<pm jdebruijn > d irecth ex: I'm go ing to  chec kthe d iffer e n ce s
< pm jdebruijn> d ire cthex :thebase di rectory seems to b e  th e only differ enc e, t h e nI'l l  s t ick  w i tht h e old tarball
< pmjdebruij n> wo n't
<directhex> DktrKranz,_xsp is_in univsre, and it's_okay for_xsp_to have_1.0_deps (xsp2 from_the same course_package is the 2.0_version)
<cjwatson> if the_tarball_has changed but has the same version number, then you must artificially rename it
<c_korn>_DktrKranz:_I am_in_contact_with Sylvestre. will notify him.
<DktrKranz>_directhex, cool then
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: like?
<cjwatson>_you cannot_have two objects with the same file name_but_different contents in_the same archive
<cjwatson> pmjdebruijn: up to you
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: "the_same archive" is intrepid and jaunty_stuff mixed then?
<cjwatson>_yes.
<pmjdebruijn>_ugh
<DktrKranz>_pmjdebruijn, foo_0.1+repack.orig.tar.gz could go
<cjwatson>_there's a single pool
<pmjdebruijn> hmmm
<cjwatson> which_will then mean that your package_is versioned 0.1+repack-0ubuntu1 or whatever
<pmjdebruijn> oh well,_too bad for folks still on_Intrepid then
<cjwatson> why *not* rename_it?
<cjwatson> it's_the right thing to do
<pmjdebruijn>_is it?
<directhex> the_root question_here is, why_do you WANT different orig with_the same version?
_* cjwatson -> out
<DktrKranz> nhandler, bug_266919,_is it managed_using_Rosetta?_I can't_find it in_package_list.
<ubottu> Launchpad_bug_266919 in knoda "knoda italian translation"_[Undecided,Invalid]_https://launchpad.net/bugs/266919
<slytherin> when specifying CFLAGS, is order of_the flags important?
<pmjdebruijn> directhex:_I'm_going to check the_differences
<pmjdebruijn> directhex: the base directory_seems to be the only difference,_then I'll_stick with_the old tarball
<pmjdebruijn> won't