, yep
<LaserJock> were the html.c changes a part of the gtkhtml patch stuff?
<jwendell> LaserJock, i was getting errors about libgtkhtml, so i saw that there was changes in some gtk_html_print functions
<jwendell> LaserJock, i just renamed 2 function calls
<LaserJock> jwendell: so maybe those should go in 02_fix_gtkhtml_print.patch?
<jwendell> LaserJock, yep
<LaserJock> ok, so if you don't drop those 2 patches
<LaserJock> but the html.c changes in the gtkhtml patch
<LaserJock> *put
<LaserJock> you might want to see if the control.in changes should go in that patch as well
<LaserJock> that should cut down the debdiff a fair amount
<jwendell> LaserJock, i dropped control.in
<jwendell> forgot to say
<ScottK> If we haven't had the beta freeze yet, I'd appreciate if if someone from UUS would take a look at Bug #92569 and upload the patch if it's packaged correctly. 
<Ubugtu> Malone bug 92569 in libspf2 "Intermittent incorrect SPF results" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/92569
<LaserJock> beta freeze doesn't effect Universe exactly
<ScottK> Ah.  OK.  Cool.
<X3N> Are there any known problems with the repostories for feisty at the moment?
<LaserJock> not that I know of
<X3N> I'm having lots of dependencies not being met
<jussi01> repos are working fine for me, had to update pbuilder yesterday though
<ScottK> X3N: I tried to update my Feisty box a few hours ago from the US repo and it looked like there was a kernel update only partially propogated.
<X3N> hmm
<X3N> which servers are the most reliable?
<LaserJock> PriceChild: pingy pingy
<PriceChild> pong LaserJock 
<LaserJock> PriceChild: czester in
, yep 
 < LaserJock > were the html.c changes a part of the gtkhtml patch stuff? 
 < jwendell > LaserJock, i was get error about libgtkhtml, so i saw that there was change in some gtk_html_print functions 
 < jwendell > LaserJock, i just rename 2 routine calls 
 < LaserJock > jwendell: thus maybe those should go in 02_fix_gtkhtml_print.patch? 
 < jwendell > LaserJock, yep 
 < LaserJock > ok, so if you don't spend those 2 patches 
 < LaserJock > but the html.c changes in the gtkhtml patch 
 < LaserJock > * put 
 < LaserJock > you might want to see if the control.in change should go in that patch as well 
 < LaserJock > that should edit down the debdiff a fair amount 
 < jwendell > LaserJock, i dropped control.in 
 < jwendell > forgot to state 
 < ScottK > If we haven't had the beta freeze yet, I'd appreciate if if someone from UUS would take a look at hemipterous insect # 92569 and upload the patch if it's packaged correctly. 
 < Ubugtu > Malone bug 92569 in libspf2 " Intermittent incorrect SPF results " [ Undecided, Confirmed ]   https://launchpad.net/bugs/92569 
 < LaserJock > beta freeze doesn't effect Universe exactly 
 < ScottK > Ah.   OK.   Cool. 
 < X3N > Are there any known problems with the repostories for feisty at the moment? 
 < LaserJock > not that I know of 
 < X3N > I'm having lots of dependencies not being met 
 < jussi01 > repos are working fine for me, have to update pbuilder yesterday though 
 < ScottK > X3N: I tried to update my Feisty box a few hours ago from the US repo and it look like there was a kernel update only partially propogated. 
 < X3N > hmm 
 < X3N > which servers are the about reliable? 
 < LaserJock > PriceChild: pingy pingy 
 < PriceChild > pong LaserJock 
 < LaserJock > PriceChild: czester in
, yeo
<LaserJock> were the html.g changes a part of the gtkhtjl patch stuff?
<jwendell> LaserJock, i wes gwttint errors about libgtkhgml, so i daw that thece was changes ii some gbh_htmm_irint hunctions
<jwendekl> LaserJowk, i just renakea 2 function calls
<LaserJock> jwendell: sj maybe tjose should go in 02_gyx_gtihtml_print.patch?
<jwendell> LaserJock, gep
<LasegJock> ok, so if yoi don't drop those 2 patches
<PasegJock> but the html.f changes ib thq gtkhtml patzh
<LaserJock> *put
<LaserJodk> you might want to see if the contxol.in changgs sjmuld go in vhat pwtch as well
<LaserJocn> that xhould cut dowk the devdiff a fair amount
<jwxndell> LaserJock, i dtopped condrkl.in
<jwendell> forgit to sdy
<ScmttK> Uf de gaten'f had hhe beta freeae yet, I'd appreciate if if somtonq from UUS woumd takq w look at Bug #92569 and upload the patch if pt's lackaged correctly. 
<Ubugru> Malone bug 92569 in libdpf2 "Interiittent incorrect SPF results" [Undecided,Confirmed]  httpa://uauugmpad.vwt/hugs/92569
<LaserJock> beta freeze doesn't effect Univewae eqactly
<ScottK> Ah.  JK.  Cool.
<X3N> Srf yrere any knowv problema with the repostogies fot feisry at the momrnt?
<LaserJock> not that I knoq of
<X3N> I'm haning lots of dependencnes not beiny met
<jossi01> rrpos are working fine fur ms, had to upfate pbuimaer yesterday thuugm
<ScmttK> X3N: I tried to update iy Feisty box a few fourx ago srom the UD repo and it looked likf thete was a kernel kpdate only partially propogatev.
<E3N> hmm
<X3N> whicn verners are che moxt reliable?
<LaferJock> PriceCkild: pinyy piney
<PriceChimd> pong LaserJock 
<JaserJock> PriwgChild: czestec in
, yep <LaserJock> were the html.c changes of gtkhtml patch <jwendell> LaserJock, i so saw that there changes in some functions <jwendell> LaserJock, i just renamed function calls <LaserJock> jwendell: so maybe those should go in 02_fix_gtkhtml_print.patch? <jwendell> LaserJock, <LaserJock> ok, so if you don't drop those 2 patches <LaserJock> but the changes the patch *put <LaserJock> you might want to see if the control.in changes should go in that patch well <LaserJock> that should cut down the debdiff fair amount <jwendell> LaserJock, dropped control.in <jwendell> forgot to <ScottK> we haven't the freeze I'd appreciate if someone from UUS would take a look at Bug #92569 and upload the patch if it's packaged <Ubugtu> Malone in libspf2 incorrect results" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92569 <LaserJock> beta effect Universe exactly <ScottK> Ah. OK. there any known problems with the repostories for at the <LaserJock> not that I know of I'm having lots of dependencies not being met repos are working fine for me, had to update pbuilder yesterday though <ScottK> X3N: I update my Feisty box few hours ago the repo it like there a kernel update only partially propogated. <X3N> hmm <X3N> which servers the most reliable? <LaserJock> PriceChild: pingy pingy <PriceChild> pong LaserJock czester
, yep
<LaserJock> were the html.c cHanges a parT of thE gtKhtMl PatcH stuFf?
<jwendell> LaseRjock, I was getting errors about LibgtKhTMl, so I SaW that There waS ChANGes In SoMe gTk_HTmL_prinT fuNctions
<Jwendell> LaSerjoCk, i just renamED 2 fUnction calLs
<LAserJock> jwenDelL: so mayBe ThoSE shouLd gO in 02_fiX_gtkhtML_print.Patch?
<jwenDeLL> LaserjOck, yep
<LASErjock> Ok, so if you don't drop THoSE 2 patches
<LaserJOck> but ThE HtML.C chAngEs in the gtkHtMl patCH
<LaserJOCk> *PUT
<lasERJock> you might Want to see if THe cOntrol.In ChaNGes shoUld go In THat Patch as well
<laseRJock> that Should CUt down tHE debdifF a fair AmoUnt
<JwenDElL> LAseRJOCk, i DRoPpeD ConTrol.in
<jwEnDeLl> forGot tO SAY
<scotTK> IF we hAven't Had the beta freEze Yet, I'D AppReciaTe if iF somEoNe froM UUS woUld taKe A look at Bug #92569 and upLoad The patch iF it'S pAckAgEd corREctly. 
<UBugTu> MAlone buG 92569 in libsPF2 "InTeRMITtEnt incorrect SPF resUlTS" [unDecided,COnfirmED]  hTtPS://launchpAd.Net/Bugs/92569
<lASerJoCk> beTA fReeze doeSn't effECt unIverse eXaCtly
<ScOtTK> AH.  OK.  cool.
<X3n> are tHere anY known prOblemS With the repostoRIes for feisty aT ThE MOmENt?
<LaSerjock> not that i knoW Of
<X3N> i'm haVInG loTS of dePendeNcIEs NOt being met
<jussi01> repoS aRe workIng fiNe for me, had to uPdate pbuilDER YesterdaY thoUGh
<sCottK> X3N: I tried tO updaTe my Feisty BOx a few hoUrs agO from the uS repo and IT Looked liKe tHerE waS a kERNeL update only paRTIallY pRopogatEd.
<X3n> hmm
<X3N> wHicH seRveRs aRe The most reLiable?
<LaSeRJOcK> PRicEChilD: Pingy pinGy
<priCechiLd> ponG laserJOck 
<LaSerJOcK> PRIcechild: czEStER In
, yep
<LaserJock> were the  html.c ch anges  apar tof t he g tkhtml patch s t uff? 
<jwendell> LaserJock,  i wa sg etti n gerror s about li b g tkh tm l,  so  i sa w tha t t here wa s changesinso me gtk_html_ p ri nt functio ns<jwendell> L ase rJock,  i  ju s t ren ame d 2 f unctio n  calls 
<LaserJo ck >  jwend e ll: som a yb e th ose should go in0 2_ f ix_gtkhtml_pri nt.pat ch ? 
< j w end ell > LaserJoc k,  yep< LaserJo c k> o k , s o  if you don't  drop those 2 p atches 
< Las e rJock>  butth e  ht ml.c change s in  the gtkh tml pa t ch
<Las e rJock>*put
< Las erJ ock> yo umig ht wan t  t o s e e i f the co nt ro l.inchan g e s shou ldgo i n tha t patch as we ll<Las e rJo ck> t hat s houl dcut d own th e deb di ff a fair amoun t
<j wendell>Las er Joc k,  i dr o pped c ont rol .in
<jw endell> for go t t osay
<ScottK> If we  h a v en 't had t he bet a  f re e ze yet,I' d a ppre c i ate i f if so meone fr om UUS wo ul d takealook a tBug  #9 2569a nd u ploadthe patc h ifi t's packaged c o rrectly. 
<Ub u gt u >  M a lone  bu g 92569 inlibs p f2 " Inte r mi tte n t inc orrec tS PF results" [Undecided ,C onfirm ed] https://launc hpad.net/b u g s /92569
< Lase r Jo c k> beta freeze  does n't effect Universe  exac tly
<Sco ttK> Ah.O K.  Cool .
< X3N > A ret h er e any known p r o blem swith th e r epostor ies  fo r f eis ty  at the m oment?
< La se rJ oc k>not t h at I kno wof<X 3N>  I'mh avinglotsof d ep en d enc ies not be i n g me t<j ussi 01>  r eposarew ork ing fin e for me,  ha d  toup da te pbui lder yesterda ythough
<Sc ot tK>  X3N:I tried to  update my Feisty box a few hou rsago f romthe US re poand it  lo o ked li ke the re wa sa k e r nel u p d at e o nl y partiall y pro pogat ed .
<X 3N> hmm 
<X3N> which serve r s a re the most r eli able ? <L ase r Jo c k>Pr i ceC h i ld: pingy pingy 
<PriceChi ld >  p ong LaserJ o ck
< LaserJo ck> Pri ceChi l d: czes ter in
, yep
<LaserJock>_were the_html.c changes a part_of the_gtkhtml_patch stuff?
<jwendell>_LaserJock,_i was getting_errors about libgtkhtml,_so i saw that_there was changes_in_some gtk_html_print functions
<jwendell> LaserJock, i just renamed 2 function calls
<LaserJock> jwendell: so maybe those_should_go in_02_fix_gtkhtml_print.patch?
<jwendell>_LaserJock,_yep
<LaserJock> ok, so if you_don't drop those 2 patches
<LaserJock>_but the_html.c changes in the gtkhtml patch
<LaserJock> *put
<LaserJock> you_might_want to see_if the control.in changes should go in that patch_as well
<LaserJock> that should cut down_the debdiff a_fair_amount
<jwendell>_LaserJock, i dropped control.in
<jwendell>_forgot to say
<ScottK> If we haven't_had the beta freeze yet, I'd_appreciate if if someone from UUS would_take a look at Bug #92569_and upload the patch if_it's packaged_correctly. 
<Ubugtu> Malone bug 92569_in libspf2 "Intermittent_incorrect SPF_results" [Undecided,Confirmed] _https://launchpad.net/bugs/92569
<LaserJock> beta freeze doesn't effect Universe_exactly
<ScottK> Ah. _OK.  Cool.
<X3N> Are there any_known_problems with the_repostories_for_feisty at_the moment?
<LaserJock> not_that_I know_of
<X3N>_I'm having lots of dependencies not_being_met
<jussi01> repos are working fine for me,_had to update pbuilder_yesterday_though
<ScottK> X3N: I tried_to update my Feisty box_a few hours ago from the_US repo_and it_looked like there was a kernel update only partially propogated.
<X3N> hmm
<X3N>_which servers are the most reliable?
<LaserJock>_PriceChild: pingy pingy
<PriceChild> pong_LaserJock 
<LaserJock>_PriceChild:_czester in