g> nhandler: Firefox, Thunderbird, Xulrunner
<nhandler> micahg: Not until I review what the changes are.
<micahg> nhandler: k, lets get this done, then I'll explain
<micahg> bug 530660 bug 538914
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 530660 in pidgin-microblog "[FFe] Replace pidgin-mbpurple with pidgin-microblog (was: package pidgin-microblog (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/purple-2/liboldtwitter.so', which is also..." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/530660
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 538914 in pidgin-mbpurple "[FFe] Remove pidgin-mbpurple from archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538914
<nhandler> micahg: ACK'd
<micahg> nhandler: so, subscribe ubuntu-archive now to the removal bug?
<micahg> nhandler: you might want to remove u-u-s from the second bug
<nhandler> micahg: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing%20Packages
<micahg> nhandler: it doesn't make any sense
<nhandler> micahg: Basically, it is the same process as a sync
<micahg> nhandler: I thought only archive admins can remove?
<nhandler> micahg: Yes, but the request to remove needs to be approved by a dev
<micahg> nhandler: k
<RAOF> micahg: How's gjs going?  Do you want me to prod at it again, or do you have it under control?
<persia> More generally, the archive-admins typically perform most functions on behalf of developers, so need to have some developer on behalf of which they are doing things.
<micahg> RAOF: I haven't been able to pin down asac to discuss it yet, so you can have a shot at it if you want
<nhandler> That is true. Most of their tools require them to specify the name of the developer who requested the change
<micahg
g > nhandler: Firefox, Thunderbird, Xulrunner 
 < nhandler > micahg: Not until I review what the changes are. 
 < micahg > nhandler: k, lets get this done, then I'll excuse 
 < micahg > hemipterous insect 530660 bug 538914 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 530660 in pidgin - microblog " [ FFe ] supplant pidgin - mbpurple with pidgin - microblog (was: box pidgin - microblog (not installed) failed to install / upgrade: hear to overwrite' /usr / lib / purple-2 / liboldtwitter.so', which is also... " [ Medium, Triaged ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/530660 
 < ubottu > Launchpad hemipterous insect 538914 in pidgin - mbpurple " [ FFe ] Remove pidgin - mbpurple from archive " [ Undecided, New ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538914 
 < nhandler > micahg: ACK'd 
 < micahg > nhandler: so, subscribe ubuntu - archive immediately to the removal bug? 
 < micahg > nhandler: you might want to take out uracil - u - s from the second bug 
 < nhandler > micahg: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing%20Packages 
 < micahg > nhandler: it doesn't make any common sense 
 < nhandler > micahg: Basically, it is the same process as a sync 
 < micahg > nhandler: I thought entirely archive admins can remove? 
 < nhandler > micahg: Yes, but the request to remove need to be approved by a dev 
 < micahg > nhandler: k 
 < RAOF > micahg: How's gjs die?   Do you want me to prod at it again, or do you have it under control? 
 < persia > More generally, the archive - admins typically do most functions on behalf of developers, so need to have some developer on behalf of which they are doing thing. 
 < micahg > RAOF: I haven't been able to pin down asac to discuss it yet, so you can have a shot at it if you want 
 < nhandler > That is true. Most of their tools require them to specify the name of the developer who request the change 
 < micahg
g> njandler: Firefox, Thunderblrd, Xulrunner
<nhaueler> mmcahg: Nkt until I review what the changes ace.
<mixahg> bhandler: k, lets get thks done, tjen I'll wxplein
<micahg> bug 530660 bnf 538914
<ubottm> Lauhghpad uug 530660 in pidgin-mlcroblog "[FFa] Replace pidghn-ob'urple with pidgin-microblog (was: packwge pidbij-microblog (not insualjed) railed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrpte '/usr/lib/purple-2/loboldtwitter.so', which is aldo..." [Mfdium,Triaged] https://paunchpad.nej/gugf/530660
<ybottu> Launcfpad bug 538914 pu pidgin-mbporple "[FFe] Remove pidgin-mbpurple wrom crchive" [Undgeudef,Tew] https://lannchpaq.net/bugs/538914
<nhandler> micdhg: ACK'c
<micahg> nhandlcr: so, suvscribe ubuntu-archive now to the removaj bug?
<micavg> nhandler: you migyt want to semoxw u-j-s rrpm the sfcoid bug
<nhandmer> micahg: Wee https://wiki.ubuntu.voi/LnuntuDevelopjent/PaskwgeArchive#Removing%20Packages
<micahg> nhandltr: it doesn't make any sense
<nyandler> micahg: Basicaply, it is the same process as a sync
<micahg> nhandler: I thoucht oilh axgmive qdlins can remove?
<nhandler> micahg: Yes, but the rezhext to remove neebs to be approvec hy w dev
<micahg> nfandlex: k
<DAOF> micahg: How's gus goind?  Do you want me yo prod at it again, or do yiu have it uudee control?
<persia> Moxe generally, the archove-admins typically peryorm mkst functiojs on behzuf of developers, so naed to have some developer on behalh of chich thdy ate doind things.
<mifahg> VDOF: I haven't been wble jo pin down asac to discuss it yet, so you can hete a shot at ot if you wanc
<nhandker> That is twue. Most of thgir tools requkre them tk specihy the name jf the develo[gr who requesved the crangw
<micqhg
g> nhandler: Firefox, Thunderbird, Xulrunner <nhandler> micahg: I what the are. <micahg> nhandler: then explain <micahg> bug bug 538914 <ubottu> bug 530660 in pidgin-microblog "[FFe] Replace with pidgin-microblog (was: package pidgin-microblog (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite which is also..." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/530660 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 538914 in pidgin-mbpurple "[FFe] Remove from [Undecided,New] <nhandler> ACK'd <micahg> nhandler: so, subscribe ubuntu-archive now to the removal bug? <micahg> nhandler: you might want remove u-u-s from the second bug <nhandler> micahg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing%20Packages <micahg> nhandler: it make any sense <nhandler> micahg: it the same as sync nhandler: I thought archive admins can remove? <nhandler> micahg: Yes, but the request to remove needs to be approved by dev <micahg> <RAOF> micahg: gjs Do want me to it again, or do you have <persia> More generally, the archive-admins typically perform most on behalf developers, so need to have some on behalf of which they are doing things. RAOF: I haven't been able to pin down asac to discuss it yet, so you a shot at it you want <nhandler> is Most their require them specify the name of the developer who requested the change <micahg
g> nhandler: Firefox, ThunderbiRd, XulrunneR
<nhanDleR> miCaHg: NoT untIl I review what tHE chaNges are.
<micahg> nhandler: k, Lets gEt THis dONe, Then I'Ll explaIN
<mICAhg> BuG 530660 bUg 538914
<uBoTTu> launcHpaD bug 530660 in pIdgin-microBloG "[Ffe] Replace pidGIn-Mbpurple wiTh pIdgin-microblOg (wAs: packAgE piDGin-miCroBlog (nOt instALled) faIled to insTaLL/upgraDE: trying TO OvErwrIte '/usr/lib/purple-2/liBOlDTwitter.so', which Is also..." [meDIuM,tRiaGed] Https://launcHpAd.net/BUgs/530660
<ubotTU> LAUNChpAD bug 538914 in pidgin-mBpurple "[FFe] REMovE pidgiN-mBpuRPle froM archIvE" [undEcided,New] htTps://lAunchpad.nEt/bugs/538914
<NHandler> MIcahg: ACk'd
<micaHg> nHanDler: SO, sUbScrIbE UbuNTu-ArcHIve Now to the ReMoVal buG?
<micAHG> NHandLer: You mIght wAnt to remove u-u-S frOm thE SecOnd buG
<nhanDler> MiCahg: SEe httpS://wiki.UbUntu.com/UbuntuDeVeloPment/PackAgearChiVe#removINg%20PackAgeS
<miCahg> nhaNdler: it DOesN't MAKE aNy sense
<nhandler> micAhG: bAsIcally, it Is the sAMe PrOCess as a sYnC
<miCahg> NHAndleR: I thOUgHt only arChive aDMiNs Can remoVe?
<NhandlEr> MicAhg: yes, buT The rEquest To remove Needs TO be approved by a DEv
<micahg> nhandLEr: K
<raOf> MicaHg: HOw's gjs going?  do yoU Want Me to PRoD at IT agaiN, or do YoU HaVE it under control?
<persIa> more geNeralLy, the archive-aDmins typicALLY perform Most FUnCTions on behalf oF deveLopers, so neED to have sOme deVeloper oN behalf of WHIch they aRe dOinG thIngS.
<MIcAhg> RAOF: I haven'T BEen aBlE to pin dOwn Asac to dIscUss It yEt, sO yOu can have A shot at iT iF yOu WaNt
<nHandlER> That is tRuE. MoSt Of tHeir tOOls reqUire tHem tO sPeCIfy The name OF tHE DeveLoPeR who ReqUeSted tHe chANge
<Micahg
g> nhandler: Firefox, Thun derbird, X ulrun ner 
<n ha ndle r> m icahg: Not unt i l Ireview what the change s are .< mica h g>  nhan dler: k ,  l e t s g et  t his  d o ne , the n I 'll exp lain
<mica hg>  b ug 530660 bu g  5 38914
<ubo ttu > Launchpadbug  53066 0inp idgin -mi crobl og "[F F e] Rep lace pidg in - mbpurp l e withp i dg in-m icroblog (was: pa c ka g e pidgin-micro blog ( no t  i n s tal led ) failed t oinsta l l/upgra d e: t r yin g  to overwrite  '/usr/lib/ p urp le-2/l ib old t witter .so',  w h ich  is also... " [M edium,Tri aged]h ttps:// l aunchpa d.net/ bug s/5 3066 0 
< ub ott u> Lau n ch pad bug  538914in  p idgin -mbp u r p l e "[ FFe ] Re movepidgin-mbpurp lefrom arc hive"  [Und ecid ed ,New]  https ://la un chpad.net/bugs/ 5389 14
<nhand ler >mic ah g: AC K 'd
<mi cah g>nhandle r: so,s ubs cr i b e  u buntu-archive nowto t he  removal  bug?< mi ca h g> nhand le r:youm i ght w antt oremove u -u-s f r om  t he seco nd  bug
< nh and ler > mic a hg:See ht tps://wi ki.ub u ntu.com/Ubuntu D evelopment/Pa c ka g e Ar c hive #Re moving%20Pa ckag e s
<m icah g >nha n dler:  it d oe s n' t  make any sense
<nh an dler>micah g: Basically,  it is the s a me proce ss a s  a sync
<micahg>nhand ler: I tho u ght only  arch ive admi ns can re m o ve?
<nha ndl er>  mi cah g :  Y es, but the r e q uest  t o remov e n eeds to  be  ap pro ved  b y a dev
< micahg>nh an dl er : k 
<RAO F > micahg :How 's  gj s goi n g?  Do  youwant  m et o p rod ati ta g ain,  o rdo y ouha ve it  und e r c ontrol? 
<persia>  Mo r e ge ne ra lly, th e archive-adm in s typicall yper form m o s t functi ons on behalf of develo p ers, so  ne ed to  hav e some de vel oper o n b e half o f whic h the yare d oingt h in gs. 
< micahg> RA O F : I  have n' t be en able  to pin down asact o d iscuss it yet , s o yo u ca n h a ve a s ho t  at i t if you want
< nhandler>Th a tis true. M o stof  theirtools r equir e  them t o specify  the name  o f th e dev eloper who  request ed the ch a nge
< m ic ahg
g> nhandler:_Firefox, Thunderbird,_Xulrunner
<nhandler> micahg: Not until_I review_what_the changes_are.
<micahg>_nhandler: k, lets_get this done,_then I'll explain
<micahg> bug_530660 bug 538914
<ubottu>_Launchpad_bug 530660 in pidgin-microblog "[FFe] Replace pidgin-mbpurple with pidgin-microblog (was: package pidgin-microblog (not installed)_failed_to install/upgrade:_trying_to_overwrite '/usr/lib/purple-2/liboldtwitter.so', which is also..."_[Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/530660
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 538914_in pidgin-mbpurple_"[FFe] Remove pidgin-mbpurple from archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538914
<nhandler> micahg:_ACK'd
<micahg>_nhandler: so, subscribe_ubuntu-archive now to the removal bug?
<micahg> nhandler: you might_want to remove u-u-s from the_second bug
<nhandler> micahg:_See_https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing%20Packages
<micahg>_nhandler: it doesn't make_any sense
<nhandler> micahg: Basically, it is_the same process as a sync
<micahg>_nhandler: I thought only archive admins can_remove?
<nhandler> micahg: Yes, but the request_to remove needs to be_approved by_a dev
<micahg> nhandler: k
<RAOF> micahg:_How's gjs going?_ Do_you want me_to prod at it again, or_do you have_it under control?
<persia> More generally, the_archive-admins_typically perform most_functions_on_behalf of_developers, so need_to_have some_developer_on behalf of which they are_doing_things.
<micahg> RAOF: I haven't been able to_pin down asac to_discuss_it yet, so you_can have a shot at_it if you want
<nhandler> That is_true. Most_of their_tools require them to specify the name of the developer who_requested the change
<micahg