 hehe - installing gnome is more corrupting though, surely!  :P
<spacey> ogra_: :D
<sladen> evening mez.  I nearly went through birmingham, in fact I might go through there today
<minghua> LaserJock: so it seems scilab is essentially unusably in ubuntu?
<Mez> sladen, well - i'll be around - feel free to poke me to say hi
<LaserJock> minghua: I couldn't get it to work, and in unstable it is uninstabllable
<Mez> or are you going to meeting there?
<Mez> (woodbrooke)
<minghua> LaserJock: but you also said there is new upstream this February, is that what unstable has?
<LaserJock> no
<LaserJock> minghua: Debian has 2 RC bug that are ~ 6 months old
<LaserJock> minghua: scilab was taken out of testing :(
<LaserJock> minghua: the maintainer asked for an adoption so I emailed the person that responded to see where they are
<_jaldhar> minghua: you said there was a fedora skim package.  Do you know where? It does not seem to be in the core 4 repository
<minghua> _jaldhar: probably not a package.  the fedora scim maintainer told me skim is not in fedora core
<minghua> jaldhar: it may well be a private package he built himself (skim ships a.spec.in file, if I remember correctly)
<jaldhar> minghua: oh ok
<minghua> LaserJock: I see.  It's quite a shame that we have a package not working since breezy (with a bug with 3-digit number, no less) :-(
<minghua> LaserJock: but on the other hand it's non-free, which makes me reluctant to work on it
* minghua go reads scilab's license
<LaserJock> minghua: yeah, well I don't think it was so bad a while ago. I installed it ~ Dec. and it worked but it was buggy
<minghua> Hmm, scilab's license is really quite hostile among the ones for non-libre but cost
hehe - installing gnome is more corrupting though, surely!   :P 
 < spacey > ogra _: :D 
 < sladen > evening mez.   I nearly went through birmingham, in fact I might go through there today 
 < minghua > LaserJock: therefore it seem scilab is essentially unusably in ubuntu? 
 < Mez > sladen, well - i'll be around - feel detached to poke me to say hi 
 < LaserJock > minghua: I couldn't get down it to work, and in unstable it is uninstabllable 
 < Mez > or are you go to meeting there? 
 < Mez > (woodbrooke) 
 < minghua > LaserJock: but you also suppose there is new upstream this February, is that what unstable has? 
 < LaserJock > no 
 < LaserJock > minghua: Debian has 2 RC bug that are ~ 6 calendar month old 
 < LaserJock > minghua: scilab was taken out of testing :( 
 < LaserJock > minghua: the upholder asked for an adoption so I e-mail the person that responded to understand where they are 
 < _ jaldhar > minghua: you said there was a fedora skim package.   Do you know where? It does not seem to be in the core 4 depository 
 < minghua > _ jaldhar: probably not a package.   the fedora scim maintainer told me skim is not in fedora core 
 < minghua > jaldhar: it may well be a private package he built himself (skim ship a.spec.in file, if I commend correctly) 
 < jaldhar > minghua: oh ok 
 < minghua > LaserJock: I see.   It's quite a shame that we have a package not working since breezy (with a bug with 3 - digit number, no less) :-( 
 < minghua > LaserJock: but on the early hired hand it's non - free, which make me loath to knead on it 
 * minghua go reads scilab's license 
 < LaserJock > minghua: yeah, well I don't think it was therefore bad a while ago. I installed it ~ Dec. and it worked but it was buggy 
 < minghua > Hmm, scilab's license is in truth quite hostile among the ones for non - libre but cost
 heje - installing gnome is oore corrupting though, surelg!  :P
<spacdy> ogra_: :D
<sladen> evening mez.  I nearoy went through birmineham, in fwct I mitht jo through there today
<mikyhua> MwserLork: so it seems xcilab is assentially ungsxbpy in ubuntu?
<Mez> sladen, well - i'll be around - veel free to pjke kq to say hi
<LaserJock> minghua: I couldn't get it to work, and on unstable it is uninstabplabpe
<Mez> or are you gling to meejjng rhere?
<Mez> (wooabrooke)
<minghua> LaserJodk: but you also said there is ndw upxtream thiw Debgoary, is that what unstable has?
<LaserJowk> no
<LaxerJock> minghus: Dxbiab has 2 RC bug that arx ~ 6 months old
<LaserJjck> minghga: scilab was taken oyt of tesding :(
<OasdrJkcl> jinghuw: tie maintainsr asked foe an adoption so I tmayoed the persoh that rqsponded to see where they are
<_jaldhar> mpnghha: you said there was a fedora skim package.  Do you kgow where? It does not seem to be in the core 4 repmsitocy
<oinymma> _jxodjar: probably not a package.  the fedora scim mwjnuaiker told me skim is not in gefotw core
<minghua> jaldhcd: jt may well be a pgivate kackagw he builu himxelf (skim ships a.spec.in filw, if I rememyer correctly)
<jaldhar> linghua: oh uk
<mimghua> LaserJock: I see.  It's qbite a shame that we have z package not woryinn shnce bretxy (with a bug witr 3-digit nnmber, no lesr) :-(
<mimghua> JaserJock: hut ok the other hand it'd non-yree, fhich maked me reluctant to work on it
* miijhua go reads swildb's liceuse
<LascrJock> minghua: reah, well I dou't think it wxs so bad z while ago. I instwlled it ~ Dec. wnd it workev but it ras vuggt
<minghux> Hmm, scilab's locense is really quute hostile among bhe ovss for non-libre buu xost
hehe - installing gnome is more corrupting :P ogra_: :D evening mez. I fact might go through today <minghua> LaserJock: it seems scilab is essentially unusably ubuntu? <Mez> sladen, well - i'll be around - feel free to poke to say hi <LaserJock> minghua: I couldn't get it to work, and in it uninstabllable or you going to meeting there? <Mez> (woodbrooke) <minghua> LaserJock: but you also said there is new this February, is that what unstable has? <LaserJock> <LaserJock> minghua: Debian has RC bug that are ~ months <LaserJock> minghua: was out testing :( <LaserJock> the maintainer asked for an adoption so I emailed the person that responded to see where they <_jaldhar> minghua: there was fedora package. you know where? not seem to be in the <minghua> _jaldhar: probably not a package. the fedora maintainer told skim is not in fedora core jaldhar: it may well be a private package built himself (skim ships a.spec.in file, if I remember correctly) <jaldhar> minghua: oh ok <minghua> see. It's quite a that we have package working breezy a bug 3-digit number, no less) :-( <minghua> LaserJock: but on the other it's non-free, which makes me reluctant to work on it go scilab's license <LaserJock> yeah, well I don't it so bad a while installed ~ worked it buggy <minghua> Hmm, scilab's is really quite hostile among ones for non-libre but
 hehe - installing gnome is more Corrupting ThougH, suRelY!  :P
<SpacEy> ogRa_: :D
<sladen> eveniNG mez.  i nearly went through birmInghaM, iN Fact i MiGht go Through THeRE TodAy
<MiNghUa> lAsErJocK: so It seems Scilab is esSenTiAlly unusably IN uBuntu?
<Mez> slAdeN, well - i'll be arOunD - feel fReE to POke me To sAy hi
<LAserJoCK> minghUa: I couldn'T gET it to wORk, and in UNStAble It is uninstabllablE
<meZ> Or are you going tO meetiNg THeRE?
<mez> (WooDbrooke)
<minGhUa> LasERJock: buT YoU ALSo sAId there is new uPstream this fEbrUary, is ThAt wHAt unstAble hAs?
<lAseRJock> no
<LaseRJocK> minghua: DEbian hAS 2 RC bug tHAt are ~ 6 moNths olD
<LaSerjock> MInGhUa: sCiLAb wAS tAkeN Out Of testinG :(
<LAsErJocK> minGHUA: The mAinTainEr askEd for an adoptiOn sO I emAIleD the pErson That ReSpondEd to seE wherE tHey are
<_jaldhar> miNghuA: you said tHerE wAs a FeDora sKIm packAge.  do yOu know wHere? It dOEs nOt SEEM tO be in the core 4 reposiToRY
<MiNghua> _jalDhar: prOBaBlY Not a packAgE.  thE fedORA scim MainTAiNer told mE skim iS NoT iN fedora CoRe
<mingHuA> jaLdhAr: it mAY welL be a prIvate pacKage hE Built himself (skIM ships a.spec.in FIlE, IF I REmemBer Correctly)
<jaLdhaR> MingHua: oH Ok
<MinGHua> LaSerJoCk: i SeE.  it's quite a shame that wE hAve a paCkage Not working sinCe breezy (wiTH A Bug with 3-dIgit NUmBEr, no less) :-(
<minghuA> LaseRJock: but on THe other hAnd it'S non-free, Which makeS ME reluctaNt tO woRk oN it
* MINgHua go reads sciLAB's liCeNse
<LaseRJoCk> minghUa: yEah, WelL I dOn'T think it wAs so bad a WhIlE aGo. i inStallED it ~ Dec. anD iT woRkEd bUt it wAS buggy
<MinghUa> HmM, sCiLAb's License IS rEALly qUiTe HostIle AmOng thE oneS For Non-librE but cost
 hehe - installing gnome i s more cor rupti ngtho ug h, s urel y!  :P
<spacey >  ogr a_: :D
<sladen> evenin g mez .I ne a rl y wen t throu g hb i rmi ng ha m,in fa ct Imig ht go t hrough the reto day
<minghua >  L aserJock:soit seems sci lab  is es se nti a lly u nus ablyin ubu n tu?
<M ez> slade n, well - i'll be a ro und- feel free to po k em e to say hi
<L aserJo ck >  m i n ghu a:I couldn't  g et it to work ,  a n d inu nstable it is  uninstabll a ble 
<Mez>  o r a r e yougoing  t o  me eting there ?
<M ez> (wood brooke ) 
<mingh u a> Lase rJock:  bu t y ou a l so  s aid  t h ere is  ne w  up stream t hi sFebru ary, i s that  wh at u nstab le has?
<Lase rJo ck>n o
< Laser Jock>  min gh ua: D ebianhas 2  R C bug that are~ 6months ol d
< La ser Jo ck> m i nghua:  sc ila b was t aken ou t  of  t e s t in g :(
<LaserJock> m in g h ua : the ma intain e ras k ed for a nado ptio n so Iemai l ed  the per son th a tre sponded  t o seewh ere  th ey ar e 
<_j aldhar > minghu a: yo u  said there wa s  a fedora ski m  p a c ka g e. Doyou know wh ere? It d oesn ot  se e m tobe in  t h ec ore 4 repository
<m in ghua>_jald har: probably  not a pac k a g e.  thefedo r as cim maintainer  told  me skim i s  not infedor a core
< minghua>j a ldhar: i t m aywel l b e aprivate packa g e  hebu ilt him sel f (skim  sh ips  a. spe c. in file,if I rem em be rco rre ctly) <jaldhar >min gh ua:  oh o k 
<ming hua>Lase rJ oc k : I  see. I t' s quit easham e t ha t wehave a p ackagenot worki ngs ince  b re ezy (wi th a bug with  3 -digit num be r,no les s )  :-(
<mi nghua> LaserJock: but o n  the ot her  hand  it' s non-fre e,whichmak e s me r elucta nt to  w ork o n it* mi ngh ua  go readss c ila b's l ic ense 
<Laser Jock> minghua: yea h , w ell I don't t hin k it w as  so ba d  awh i lea g o. I installedit ~ Dec.an d  i t worked b u t i twas bug gy
<min ghua> Hmm, sc ilab's li cense isre ally q uit e hostileamong th e ones fo r  non- l ib re bu t c ost
 hehe_- installing_gnome is more corrupting_though, surely!__:P
<spacey> ogra_:_:D
<sladen>_evening mez. _I nearly went_through birmingham, in fact_I might go_through_there today
<minghua> LaserJock: so it seems scilab is essentially unusably in ubuntu?
<Mez> sladen, well_-_i'll be_around_-_feel free to poke me_to say hi
<LaserJock> minghua: I_couldn't get_it to work, and in unstable it is_uninstabllable
<Mez>_or are you_going to meeting there?
<Mez> (woodbrooke)
<minghua> LaserJock: but you also_said there is new upstream this_February, is that_what_unstable_has?
<LaserJock> no
<LaserJock> minghua: Debian_has 2 RC bug that are_~ 6 months old
<LaserJock> minghua: scilab_was taken out of testing :(
<LaserJock> minghua:_the maintainer asked for an adoption_so I emailed the person_that responded_to see where they are
<_jaldhar>_minghua: you said_there was_a fedora skim_package.  Do you know where?_It does not_seem to be in the core_4_repository
<minghua> _jaldhar: probably_not_a_package. _the fedora scim_maintainer_told me_skim_is not in fedora core
<minghua> jaldhar:_it_may well be a private package he_built himself (skim ships_a.spec.in_file, if I remember_correctly)
<jaldhar> minghua: oh ok
<minghua> LaserJock:_I see.  It's quite a_shame that_we have_a package not working since breezy (with a bug with 3-digit_number, no less) :-(
<minghua> LaserJock: but_on the other hand_it's non-free,_which_makes me reluctant_to_work on_it
* minghua go reads scilab's license
<LaserJock> minghua:_yeah, well_I don't think it was so_bad a while ago._I_installed it ~ Dec. and it_worked but it was buggy
<minghua> Hmm,_scilab's license is really quite_hostile_among_the ones for non-libre but_cost