ruijn> sorry
<DktrKranz> you should replace %(ppa)s with your LP id
<pmjdebruijn> 'incoming = ~pmjdebruijn/ubuntu' should be okay then?
<DktrKranz> c_korn, it's legal to remove it, I'd be more inclined report Sylvestre just to be sure it will removed Debian side too
<DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, incoming = ~pmjdebruijn/ppa/ubuntu
<pmjdebruijn> DktrKranz: my stock dput.cf doesn't include /ppa/
<DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, there have been changes in PPA incoming directory, now /ppa/ is part of the path. Not sure if they removed compatibility with old ~LP_id/ubuntu, though, but using new format is safe.
<pmjdebruijn> ok
<pmjdebruijn> now I have a file conflict
<pmjdebruijn> a downstream tarball has changed
<pmjdebruijn> aren't packages for intrepid and jaunty seperated?
<pmjdebruijn> I need the new tarball, but I don't want to break my Intrepid package
<cjwatson> I understand that you can do 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn' rather than having to edit the default file
<DktrKranz> if you have the same.orig.tar.gz name but with different md5 sums, it will get rejected
<cjwatson> or 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn/ppa' if you have it in the form pmjdebruijn quoted
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: right
<cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/
<cjwatson> oops
<cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/simplifying-dputcf-for-multiple-ppas
<pmjdebruijn> I already edited the file, and it's fine now
<pmjdebruijn> my problem now is a tarball conflict with an older package
<pmjdebruijn> which I do _not_ want to break

ruijn > sorry 
 < DktrKranz > you should replace% (ppa)s with your LP i d 
 < pmjdebruijn >' incoming = ~pmjdebruijn / ubuntu' should be okay then? 
 < DktrKranz > c_korn, it's legal to remove it, I'd be more inclined reputation Sylvestre barely to be sure it will removed Debian side besides 
 < DktrKranz > pmjdebruijn, incoming = ~pmjdebruijn / ppa / ubuntu 
 < pmjdebruijn > DktrKranz: my stock dput.cf doesn't include /ppa/ 
 < DktrKranz > pmjdebruijn, there have been change in PPA incoming directory, now /ppa/ is part of the way. Not certain if they removed compatibility with previous ~LP_id / ubuntu, though, but using new format is dependable. 
 < pmjdebruijn > ok 
 < pmjdebruijn > now I have a file battle 
 < pmjdebruijn > a downstream tarball has changed 
 < pmjdebruijn > aren't packages for audacious and jaunty seperated? 
 < pmjdebruijn > I need the new tarball, but I don't want to transgress my Intrepid package 
 < cjwatson > I understand that you can do' dput ppa: pmjdebruijn' preferably than having to edit the nonpayment file 
 < DktrKranz > if you have the same.orig.tar.gz name but with different md5 sums, it will get rejected 
 < cjwatson > or' dput ppa: pmjdebruijn / ppa' if you have it in the mannequin pmjdebruijn quoted 
 < pmjdebruijn > cjwatson: right 
 < cjwatson > http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/ 
 < cjwatson > oops 
 < cjwatson > http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/simplifying-dputcf-for-multiple-ppas 
 < pmjdebruijn > I already edited the file, and it's fine now 
 < pmjdebruijn > my problem now is a tarball conflict with an older package 
 < pmjdebruijn > which I do _ not _ want to break
ruiun> sorry
<DktrKranz> you shuuld replace %(ppc)w with your MP id
<pmjaebruijn> 'incoming = ~pmjdebruion/ubyntu' whould be okay then?
<DktfKranz> c_klrn, it's oegao to remove it, I'd bc mors incnmned report Sylyestre just to be sure it wklp removed Debian side too
<DktrKranz> [mjdebriiun, incoming = ~pijdenwuijh/ipc/ubuntu
<pmjdebruijn> DktrKranz: my stock vput.cf doesn't imclude /ppa/
<DktrKranz> pmjdebguijj, there have been fhanges in KLA ybcoming direztory, now /kpc/ is part or the path. Not sure if they remuved eompatibilijv wihv old ~LP_id/uuuntu, nhough, but uslmg new format is safe.
<pmjdebvuijn> ok
<pmjdebruijn> now I havx a file conflict
<pmjqebruijn> d bownstream tarball haw xhanggd
<pmjgebrjujn> artn't pzckaged fkr intrepis and jauntt seperated?
<pmjdebruojg> I need the nsw tarfajl, but I don't want to break my Intrepid padkage
<cjwatson> I understqnd that you can do 'dkut ppa:pmjqebruijn' rather than having to edit the default fhle
<DkvrYraud> kd jou have the same.orig.tar.gz name but with diffqdemt md5 sums, it wijl get rejevtfd
<vtwatson> or 'dpot ppa:pmjdsbruijn/ppa' if you jave it in tye form pijdenruijn quoted
<pmjdebruijn> cjqatson: right
<bjwarson> http://blog.launckpad.net/ppa/htcp://blog.kauncnpad.net/ppa/
<cjwatson> oops
<ejwatskn> http://blog.paunchpad.hdt/ppa/simplifying-apuncf-fmr-multiple-ppas
<pmjdebruijn> Y already ediced the wile, and ie's fine noa
<pmjdctruijn> my problem jow id d tarball fonflict with an older package
<pmjdebruijn> whivh I go _not_ wcnt to break

ruijn> sorry <DktrKranz> you should replace %(ppa)s LP <pmjdebruijn> 'incoming ~pmjdebruijn/ubuntu' should be legal remove it, I'd more inclined report just to be sure it will Debian side too <DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, incoming = ~pmjdebruijn/ppa/ubuntu <pmjdebruijn> DktrKranz: my stock dput.cf include /ppa/ <DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, there have been changes in PPA incoming directory, now is of path. sure if they removed compatibility with old ~LP_id/ubuntu, though, but using new format is safe. <pmjdebruijn> <pmjdebruijn> now I have a file conflict <pmjdebruijn> downstream tarball has changed aren't packages for intrepid and seperated? I need new but don't want to my Intrepid package <cjwatson> I understand that you can do 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn' rather than having to edit default file you have same.orig.tar.gz but different md5 sums, get rejected <cjwatson> or 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn/ppa' it in the form pmjdebruijn quoted <pmjdebruijn> cjwatson: <cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/ oops <cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/simplifying-dputcf-for-multiple-ppas <pmjdebruijn> I already the file, and it's fine now <pmjdebruijn> my now is a tarball conflict with an older package <pmjdebruijn> which I do _not_ want
ruijn> sorry
<DktrKranz> you shoUld replace %(Ppa)s wIth YouR Lp id
<pMjdeBruijn> 'incoming = ~PMjdeBruijn/ubuntu' should be okAy theN?
<DKTrKrANz> C_korn, It's legaL To REMovE iT, I'D be MoRE iNclinEd rEport SyLvestre jusT to Be Sure it will reMOvEd Debian siDe tOo
<DktrKranz> pMjdEbruijN, iNcoMIng = ~pmJdeBruijN/ppa/ubUNtu
<pmjDebruijn> DKtRkranz: mY Stock dpUT.Cf DoesN't include /ppa/
<DktrKRAnZ> Pmjdebruijn, theRe have BeEN cHANgeS in pPA incominG dIrectORy, now /ppA/ Is PART of THe path. Not sure If they removED coMpatibIlIty WIth old ~lP_id/uBuNTu, tHough, but usiNg neW format is Safe.
<pmJDebruijN> Ok
<pmjdeBruijn> Now i haVe a fILe CoNflIcT
<PmjDEbRuiJN> a dOwnstreaM tArBall hAs chANGED
<pmjDebRuijN> aren'T packages for iNtrEpid ANd jAunty SeperAted?
<PmJdebrUijn> I nEed thE nEw tarball, but I doN't waNt to break My INtRepId PackaGE
<cjwatSon> i unDerstanD that yoU Can Do 'DPUT pPa:pmjdebruijn' ratheR tHAN hAving to eDit the DEfAuLT file
<DktRKRanZ> if yOU Have tHe saME.oRig.tar.gz Name buT WiTh DiffereNt Md5 sums, It WilL geT rejeCTed
<cJwatsoN> or 'dput pPa:pmjDEbruijn/ppa' if yoU Have it in the foRM pMJDeBRuijN quOted
<pmjdebrUijn> CJwatSon: rIGhT
<cjWAtson> Http://bLoG.LaUNchpad.net/ppa/http://bloG.lAunchpAd.net/Ppa/
<cjwatson> ooPs
<cjwatson> HTTP://blog.lauNchpAD.nET/ppa/simplifyinG-dputCf-for-multiPLe-ppas
<pmJdebrUijn> I alrEady editeD THe file, anD it'S fiNe nOw
<pMJDeBruijn> my problEM Now iS a Tarball ConFlict wiTh aN olDer PacKaGe
<pmjdebrUijn> whicH I Do _NoT_ wAnt To breAK

ruijn> sorry
<DktrKranz> y ou shouldrepla ce%(p pa )s w ithyour LP id
<pm j debr uijn> 'incoming = ~pmj debru ij n /ubu n tu ' sho uld beo ka y the n? 
< Dkt rK r an z> c_ kor n, it's  legal torem ov e it, I'd be mo re incline d r eport Sylves tre  justto  be sureitwillremove d  Debia n side to o< DktrKr a nz> pmj d e br uijn , incoming = ~pmj d eb r uijn/ppa/ubunt u
<pmj de b ru i j n>Dkt rKranz: my  s tockd put.cfd oe s n ' t i n clude /ppa/
< DktrKranz>p mjd ebruij n,  th e re hav e bee nc han ges in PPAinco ming dire ctory, now /pp a / is pa rt ofthe  pa th.N ot  s ure  i f  th e yrem o ved  compati bi li ty wi th o l d ~ LP_i d/u bunt u, th ough, but usi ngnewf orm at is  safe .
<p mj debru ijn> o k
<pm jd ebruijn> now Ihave  a file c onf li ct<p mjdeb r uijn>a d own streamtarball has  c h a n ge d
<pmjdebruijn> ar en ' t  p ackagesfor in t re pi d  and jau nt y s eper a t ed?
< pmjd e br uijn> Ineed t h ene w tarba ll , butIdon 'twantt o br eak my  Intrepi d pac k age
<cjwatson> I understandt ha t yo u  can  do  'dput ppa: pmjd e brui jn'r at her thanhavin gt oe dit the default fil e<DktrK ranz>  if you havethe same.o r i g .tar.gzname bu t  with differen t md5  sums, itw ill getrejec ted
<cjw atson> or ' dput ppa :pm jde bru ijn / p pa ' if you have i t in  t he form  pm jdebrui jnquo ted 
<p mj debruijn>  cjwatso n:  r ig ht 
<c jwats o n> http: // blo g. lau nchpa d .net/p pa/ht tp:/ /b lo g .la unchpad . ne t / ppa/ 
< cj wats on>  o ops
< cjwa t son > http: //blog.la unc h pad. ne t/ ppa/sim plifying-dput cf -for-multi pl e-p pas
<p m j debruijn > I already edited thef ile, an d i t's f inenow
<pmjd ebr uijn>myp roblem  now i s a t ar bal l confl i c twit han older p a c kag e
<pm jd ebru ijn> wh ich I do _not_ wan t  to  break

ruijn> sorry
<DktrKranz>_you should_replace %(ppa)s with your_LP id
<pmjdebruijn>_'incoming_= ~pmjdebruijn/ubuntu'_should_be okay then?
<DktrKranz>_c_korn, it's legal_to remove it, I'd_be more inclined_report_Sylvestre just to be sure it will removed Debian side too
<DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, incoming =_~pmjdebruijn/ppa/ubuntu
<pmjdebruijn>_DktrKranz: my_stock_dput.cf_doesn't include /ppa/
<DktrKranz> pmjdebruijn, there_have been changes in PPA_incoming directory,_now /ppa/ is part of the path. Not_sure_if they removed_compatibility with old ~LP_id/ubuntu, though, but using new format_is safe.
<pmjdebruijn> ok
<pmjdebruijn> now I have_a file conflict
<pmjdebruijn>_a_downstream_tarball has changed
<pmjdebruijn> aren't_packages for intrepid and jaunty seperated?
<pmjdebruijn>_I need the new tarball, but_I don't want to break my Intrepid_package
<cjwatson> I understand that you can_do 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn' rather than_having to_edit the default file
<DktrKranz> if_you have the_same.orig.tar.gz name_but with different_md5 sums, it will get rejected
<cjwatson>_or 'dput ppa:pmjdebruijn/ppa'_if you have it in the_form_pmjdebruijn quoted
<pmjdebruijn> cjwatson:_right
<cjwatson>_http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/
<cjwatson>_oops
<cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/simplifying-dputcf-for-multiple-ppas
<pmjdebruijn>_I already edited_the_file, and_it's_fine now
<pmjdebruijn> my problem now is_a_tarball conflict with an older package
<pmjdebruijn> which_I do _not_ want_to_break
