estlyenough> Ahhhh.
<honestlyenough> So what's the difference between the Ubuntu revision number and the Debian version number?
<honestlyenough> Ah, thanks a bunch.
<Fujitsu> The Ubuntu revision is changes made in Ubuntu, and Debian is for those made by Debian.
<crimsun> Fujitsu: fair enough, though it would probably be better to enumerate additional tags IMO
<Fujitsu> crimsun: They're all trivial, and should be lumped together IMO.
<Fujitsu> Otherwise we're going to end up with an enormous number of widely-used tags.
<danohuiginn> honestlyenough: if you use dch -i to edit the changelog, it'll sort out the version number for you (I believe)
<honestlyenough> Maybe this is a bit offtopic, but if I submitted this to Debian, and it somehow made it through their process, would I still keep mypackage-1ubuntu3 for their releases as well?
<honestlyenough> Or would it be something entirely different like mypackage-0.1-1
<honestlyenough> The mypackage-1ubuntu3 was supposed to be mypackage-0.1-1ubuntu3
<Fujitsu> honestlyenough: mypackage 0.1-1 would be the first debian release.
<Fujitsu> honestlyenough: For a new package in ubuntu, it's 0.1-0ubuntu1, not -1ubuntu1
<honestlyenough> Gotcha. So strip out the Ubuntu specific stuff then.
<honestlyenough> Okay, it's all clear now :)
<honestlyenough> You guys are a helpful bunch, maybe this is why Ubuntu is so popular :)
<LaserJock> of course ;-)
<LaserJock> honestlyenough: if you are interested in more packaging info we have a packaging guide
<LaserJock>!packagingguide
<ubotu> The packaging guide is at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/index.html - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResources
<honestlyenough> LaserJock: An Ubuntu specific packaging guide? I've read through the Debian one a few times.
<honestlyenough> Hmm, okay, I'll take a look.
<hon
estlyenough > Ahhhh. 
 < honestlyenough > So what's the difference between the Ubuntu revision number and the Debian interpretation numeral? 
 < honestlyenough > Ah, thanks a bunch. 
 < Fujitsu > The Ubuntu revision is changes make in Ubuntu, and Debian is for those made by Debian. 
 < crimsun > Fujitsu: fair enough, though it would credibly be better to enumerate additional tag IMO 
 < Fujitsu > crimsun: They're all trivial, and should be collocate together IMO. 
 < Fujitsu > Otherwise we're fail to end up with an enormous numeral of widely - used tags. 
 < danohuiginn > honestlyenough: if you use dch -i to edit the changelog, it'll sort out the adaptation number for you (I believe) 
 < honestlyenough > Maybe this is a morsel offtopic, but if I submitted this to Debian, and it somehow made it through their process, would I still continue mypackage-1ubuntu3 for their releases as well? 
 < honestlyenough > Or would it be something entirely different like mypackage-0.1 - 1 
 < honestlyenough > The mypackage-1ubuntu3 was supposed to be mypackage-0.1 - 1ubuntu3 
 < Fujitsu > honestlyenough: mypackage 0.1 - 1 would be the inaugural debian release. 
 < Fujitsu > honestlyenough: For a new package in ubuntu, it's 0.1 - 0ubuntu1, not -1ubuntu1 
 < honestlyenough > Gotcha. So strip out the Ubuntu specific stuff then. 
 < honestlyenough > Okay, it's all clear now :) 
 < honestlyenough > You guys are a helpful bunch, maybe this is why Ubuntu is so popular :) 
 < LaserJock > of course ;-) 
 < LaserJock > honestlyenough: if you are interested in more packaging information we suffer a packaging scout 
 < LaserJock>!packagingguide 
 < ubotu > The promotion scout is at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/index.html - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResources 
 < honestlyenough > LaserJock: An Ubuntu specific promotion guide? I've understand through the Debian one a few times. 
 < honestlyenough > Hmm, okay, I'll take a expression. 
 < hon
estpyenough> Ahhhh.
<honestlyenuugh> So what's tkw diffxrence getween ghe Ubuntu revision number aid tye Devian version number?
<hondstlyenouhh> Ah, thqnks q bunch.
<Fujmfsu> The Ubunth revnsmon is changes kade in Ubgntu, and Debiat ks for those made by Debian.
<crimsun> Futitsu: fsig enough, thougr it rouls probably be better to enumerate zdditioial tags IMO
<Fujotsu> crimsun: They're all trlviap, and should be lulped togethgd III.
<Fujitsu> Othdrwise we'rt yoing to ens up with an enormous number of wideky-used tagw.
<dqnojoiginn> honesvlyenolgh: if you usc dch -i to ediy the changelon, it'ln sirt out the version nnmber for you (I beligve)
<honestlfeuough> Maybe this is a but ofxtophc, bjr iw I snbmjtted hhia to Debiah, and it sonehow made it throubh nneir process, would I still keep mypackage-1ubuntu3 for their rtleasss as well?
<honestlyenougy> Or would it be somejhing entiwely different like mypackage-0.1-1
<honestlyenough> The mfpackegd-1ubbkbu3 wxw dupposed to be mypackage-0.1-1ubuntu3
<Fujitsu> honestlrsnpunh: mypackage 0.1-1 womld be the first drblam release.
<Fujitru> honzatmyenough: For a new packagg in uvuntu, it's 0.1-0ubumtu1, not -1ubuntu1
<honestlyenougy> Gotcha. So frrip out the Ubuntb specific scuff tnen.
<homestlyenough> Okay, it's aul cmear now :)
<hojestlyenoheh> You guys are x hvlpfgl bunch, maybe this is why Ubuntu iw so populaf :)
<LaxerJoch> of coursf ;-)
<LascsJock> honestlyenouhh: if ymu are intfrested in more packaging info xx have a packsghng guide
<LaferJogk>!packagingguidq
<ubotu> The paclaging yuide ks at http://soc.ubunvu.com/ubuntu/pwckagingguide/W/lndex.html - Ovher devejopee rewources xre at https://wili.ubuntu.com/DevelopeeResources
<honestlycnougf> LaserJock: An Uybnuu specific packsgivg dupde? I'da read throuch tfe Arbian one a few bimds.
<homestlyenough> Hmm, okaf, I'lm take a look.
<hon
estlyenough> Ahhhh. <honestlyenough> So what's the difference Ubuntu number and Debian version number? <Fujitsu> Ubuntu revision is made in Ubuntu, Debian is for those made by <crimsun> Fujitsu: fair enough, though it would probably be better to enumerate additional IMO <Fujitsu> crimsun: They're all trivial, and should be lumped together IMO. <Fujitsu> we're to up an enormous number of widely-used tags. <danohuiginn> honestlyenough: if you use dch -i to edit the it'll sort out the version number for you believe) <honestlyenough> Maybe this a bit offtopic, but if submitted to Debian, it made through their process, I still keep mypackage-1ubuntu3 for their releases as well? <honestlyenough> Or would it be something entirely different mypackage-0.1-1 <honestlyenough> was supposed be <Fujitsu> mypackage 0.1-1 would first debian release. <Fujitsu> honestlyenough: For in ubuntu, it's 0.1-0ubuntu1, not -1ubuntu1 <honestlyenough> Gotcha. strip out Ubuntu specific stuff then. <honestlyenough> Okay, all clear now :) <honestlyenough> You guys are helpful bunch, maybe this is why Ubuntu is so popular :) <LaserJock> of course ;-) if you are interested more packaging info have packaging <LaserJock>!packagingguide The packaging is at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/index.html - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResources <honestlyenough> An Ubuntu specific packaging guide? I've read through the Debian few <honestlyenough> Hmm, okay, take a look. <hon
estlyenough> Ahhhh.
<honestlyeNough> So whaT's the DifFerEnCe beTweeN the Ubuntu reviSIon nUmber and the Debian versiOn numBeR?
<HoneSTlYenouGh> Ah, thaNKs A BUncH.
<FUjItsU> THE UBuntu RevIsion is Changes madE in ubUntu, and DebiaN Is For those maDe bY Debian.
<crimsUn> FUjitsu: FaIr eNOugh, tHouGh it wOuld prOBably bE better to EnUMerate ADditionAL TaGs IMo
<Fujitsu> crimsun: ThEY'rE All trivial, and sHould bE lUMpED TogEthEr IMO.
<FujitSu> otherWIse we're GOiNG TO enD Up with an enormOus number of WIdeLy-used TaGs.
<dANohuigInn> hoNeSTlyEnough: if you Use dCh -i to edit The chaNGelog, it'LL sort ouT the veRsiOn nUmbeR FoR yOu (I BeLIevE)
<HoNesTLyeNough> MayBe ThIs is a Bit oFFTOPic, bUt iF I suBmittEd this to DebiaN, anD it sOMehOw madE it thRougH tHeir pRocess, Would i sTill keep mypackaGe-1ubUntu3 for thEir ReLeaSeS as weLL?
<honesTlyEnoUgh> Or woUld it be SOmeThING EnTirely different likE mYPAcKage-0.1-1
<honeStlyenOUgH> THE mypackaGe-1UbuNtu3 wAS SuppoSed tO Be MypackagE-0.1-1ubuntU3
<fuJiTsu> honeStLyenouGh: MypAckAge 0.1-1 woULd be The firSt debian ReleaSE.
<Fujitsu> honestLYenough: For a neW PaCKAgE In ubUntU, it's 0.1-0ubuntu1, nOt -1ubUNtu1
<hOnesTLyEnoUGh> GotCha. So StRIp OUt the Ubuntu specific StUff theN.
<honeStlyenough> OkaY, it's all cleAR NOw :)
<honestLyenOUgH> you guys are a helPful bUnch, maybe tHIs is why UBuntu Is so popuLar :)
<LaserJOCK> of coursE ;-)
<LaSerjocK> hoNEStLyenough: if you ARE intErEsted in MorE packagIng InfO we HavE a Packaging Guide
<LasErjoCk>!PaCkaGinggUIde
<ubotu> thE paCkAgiNg guiDE is at hTtp://doC.ubuNtU.cOM/ubUntu/pacKAgINGguiDe/c/iNdex.HtmL - OTher dEvelOPer ResourcEs are at htTps://WIki.uBuNtU.com/DevEloperResourcEs
<HonestlyenOuGh> LAserJoCK: an Ubuntu Specific packaging guide? I'VE read thRouGh the debiAn one a few TimEs.
<honeStlYEnough> hmm, okaY, I'll tAkE a lOOK.
<hon
estlyenough> Ahhhh.
<hones tlyenough>  So w hat 'sth e di ffer ence between t h e Ub untu revision number a nd th eD ebia n  v ersio n numbe r ?< h one st ly eno ug h >Ah, t han ks a bu nch.
<Fuji tsu >The Ubuntu r e vi sion is ch ang es made in U bun tu, an dDeb i an is  fo r tho se mad e  by De bian.
<cr im s un> Fu j itsu: f a i renou gh, though it wou l dp robably be bet ter to  e n um e r ate  ad ditional t ag s IMO <Fujits u >c r i msu n : They're all  trivial, a n d s houldbe  lu m ped to gethe rI MO. 
<Fujitsu>Othe rwise we' re goi n g to en d  up wit h an e nor mou s nu m be rofwi d ely - us edt ags .
<danoh ui gi nn> h ones t l y e noug h:if y ou us e dch -i to e dit  the cha ngelo g, it 'llso rt ou t theversi on  number for you  (Ibelieve)<ho ne stl ye nough >  Maybe  th isis a bi t offto p ic,  b u t if  I submitted thisto D eb ian, and  it so m eh ow made itth rou gh t h e ir pr oces s ,would Istillk ee pmypacka ge -1ubun tu 3 f ortheir rele ases a s well?<hone s tlyenough> Orw ould it be so m et h i ng enti rel y different  lik e  myp acka g e- 0.1 - 1
<ho nestl ye n ou g h> The mypackage-1u bu ntu3 w as su pposed to bemypackage- 0 . 1 -1ubuntu 3
<F u ji t su> honestlyen ough:  mypackage 0.1-1 wo uld b e the fi rst debia n release. 
<F uji tsu > h o n es tlyenough: Fo r a ne wpackage  in  ubuntu , i t's  0. 1-0 ub untu1, no t -1ubun tu 1<h on est lyeno u gh> Gotc ha . S ostr ip ou t  the U buntu  spe ci fi c  st uff the n .< h ones tl ye noug h>Ok ay, i t'sa llclear n ow :)
<ho nes t lyen ou gh > You g uys are a hel pf ul bunch,ma ybe  thisi s  why Ubu ntu is so popular :)
<L a serJock > o f cou rse;-)
<Lase rJo ck> ho nes t lyenou gh: if  youar e i n t erest e d  i n m or e packagin g inf o weha ve a  packag ing guide
<LaserJo c k>! packagingguid e
< ubot u >  T hep ac k agi ng gui d e  is at http://d oc.ubuntu. co m /u buntu/pack a gin gg uide/C/ index.h tml - Other d eveloperresources  a re a t htt ps://wiki. ubuntu.c om/Develo p erRes o ur ces
< hon estlye no ugh > Las erJock :  An  Ubun tu spe ci fic pa ckagi ng  guide?I've read through the D ebianone a  fe w times.<ho n est lyenough>  Hmm , okay, I' lltak e a l ook . 
<hon 
estlyenough> Ahhhh.
<honestlyenough>_So what's_the difference between the_Ubuntu revision_number_and the_Debian_version number?
<honestlyenough> Ah,_thanks a bunch.
<Fujitsu>_The Ubuntu revision is_changes made in_Ubuntu,_and Debian is for those made by Debian.
<crimsun> Fujitsu: fair enough, though it would_probably_be better_to_enumerate_additional tags IMO
<Fujitsu> crimsun: They're_all trivial, and should be_lumped together_IMO.
<Fujitsu> Otherwise we're going to end up with_an_enormous number of_widely-used tags.
<danohuiginn> honestlyenough: if you use dch -i to_edit the changelog, it'll sort out_the version number_for_you_(I believe)
<honestlyenough> Maybe this_is a bit offtopic, but if_I submitted this to Debian, and_it somehow made it through their process,_would I still keep mypackage-1ubuntu3 for_their releases as well?
<honestlyenough> Or_would it_be something entirely different like_mypackage-0.1-1
<honestlyenough> The mypackage-1ubuntu3_was supposed_to be mypackage-0.1-1ubuntu3
<Fujitsu>_honestlyenough: mypackage 0.1-1 would be the_first debian release.
<Fujitsu>_honestlyenough: For a new package in_ubuntu,_it's 0.1-0ubuntu1, not_-1ubuntu1
<honestlyenough>_Gotcha._So strip_out the Ubuntu_specific_stuff then.
<honestlyenough>_Okay,_it's all clear now :)
<honestlyenough> You_guys_are a helpful bunch, maybe this is_why Ubuntu is so_popular_:)
<LaserJock> of course ;-)
<LaserJock>_honestlyenough: if you are interested_in more packaging info we have_a packaging_guide
<LaserJock>!packagingguide
<ubotu> The_packaging guide is at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/index.html - Other developer resources are at_https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResources
<honestlyenough> LaserJock: An Ubuntu specific packaging_guide? I've read through_the Debian_one_a few times.
<honestlyenough>_Hmm,_okay, I'll_take a look.
<hon