 :)
<siretart> bdmurray: I fail to find any builds of openhackware. as soon as we have binaries in the archive, I'd agree, but I fail to spot them
<siretart> torkel: done!
<ScottK> bdmurray: I don't see where it ever got built?
<ScottK> IIRC it needs manual bootstrapping that no one has ever done.
<bdmurray> Wow, so on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openhackware/+publishinghistory if the builds portlet is missing that means it hasn't been built?
<bdmurray> I mean on the https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/openhackware/0.4.1-4 page
<siretart> ScottK: last time I asked adam to bootstrap it he refused to do so
<ScottK> siretart: I remember.
<siretart> ScottK: IIRC lamont suggested to ship a precompiled version uuencoded in the package, which is then installed in the 'clean' target.
<siretart> and basically that's what's the bug is about
<ScottK> Interesting idea.
<soren> I've been mening to do that for a loong time.
<soren> siretart: If you do it, I'll send you a great, big hug :)
<siretart> it is the approach taken with the palo package
 * ScottK leaves it for soren and siretart.
<soren> Oh, I just distribute the hugs. :)
<siretart> :)
<ScottK> siretart: fpc might benifit from some similar thing too.  There's a quite a number of universe packages depwait on fpc getting built.
<directhex> isn't uuencoding a terrible workaround?
<ScottK> Just in case you were looking for practice.
<ScottK> directhex: What would be better?
<siretart> ScottK: well, I don't have access to ppc hardware, so I would have to grab the binary from the debian package
 * nixternal steps on his eyeball to stop the twitching
<directhex> ScottK, if you need a bootstrap
:) 
 < siretart > bdmurray: I fail to find any builds of openhackware. as soon as we have binary star in the archive, I'd match, but I fail to spot them 
 < siretart > torkel: done! 
 < ScottK > bdmurray: I don't see where it always got built? 
 < ScottK > IIRC it needs manual bootstrapping that no one has ever cause. 
 < bdmurray > Wow, so on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openhackware/+publishinghistory if the builds portlet is miss that means it hasn't been built? 
 < bdmurray > I think of on the https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/openhackware/0.4.1-4 page 
 < siretart > ScottK: last time I ask adam to bootstrap it he refused to do so 
 < ScottK > siretart: I remember. 
 < siretart > ScottK: IIRC lamont suggested to transport a precompiled version uuencoded in the package, which is then installed in the' blank' target. 
 < siretart > and basically that's what's the bug is about 
 < ScottK > Interesting idea. 
 < soren > I've been mening to make that for a loong time. 
 < soren > siretart: If you do it, I'll send you a great, big hug :) 
 < siretart > it is the overture taken with the palo package 
  * ScottK leaves it for soren and siretart. 
 < soren > Oh, I just distribute the hugs. :) 
 < siretart > :) 
 < ScottK > siretart: fpc might benifit from some similar thing too.   There's a quite a number of universe packages depwait on fpc getting built. 
 < directhex > isn't uuencoding a terrible workaround? 
 < ScottK > Just in case you were looking for practice. 
 < ScottK > directhex: What would be good? 
 < siretart > ScottK: well, I don't have access to ppc hardware, so I would have to catch the binary from the debian package 
  * nixternal steps on his eyeball to hold on the twitching 
 < directhex > ScottK, if you need a bootstrap
 :)
<sigetart> bdmurray: I fail tu find any builbw of o'enhacksare. as roon as we have binaries in vhe qrchice, I'd agree, but I fail to spot nhem
<siretqrt> uorkel: done!
<ScottK> bdmurran: I dkk't sez xhere it ever gpt built?
<ScmttK> IIRC it naeas manual bootstrapping that no one hws ever dlne.
<bdmurray> Wor, so jn hfnpw://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kpenhacnware/+publishimghistory if the builds pogtleh is missing that leans it hawn't fwen built?
<bdmjrray> I mean on the htjps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+suurce/ppenhackwatz/0.4.1-4 pahg
<siretart> ScittK: jast time I asked addm to bpotstrap it he rehusee to do so
<ScottK> sirevart: I remember.
<siretwrt> ScottN: NIRC lamont suggested ti shik a psecoopildd becsikn uuejcoved in the lackage, whixh is then installec yb the 'clean' tzrget.
<syrqtart> and basically that's what's the bug is about
<ScottK> Interestint idea.
<soren> I've been lening to do that for a loong time.
<soren> siretart: If you do it, I'mu stne you q hreat, big hug :)
<siretart> it is the approach takqh einh the palo packane
 * ScottK leaves ot fpt soren and sitetart.
<soreh> Oh, I just distrihute thg hugs. :)
<siretart> :)
<ScoytK> siretart: fpc might benidit from somv sinilar thing too.  Tkere's a quitz a nukber pf universe packages de'wait kn fpc gettlng built.
<skrecthex> isn't uudncpdhng a terrible workaround?
<SsottK> Jusv in ease you werg lookigg for praftice.
<ScottK> directhex: Whwt woold be better?
<sirftart> ScottK: well, I don't have arress to ppc hsrgwage, so I wjuld mave to grab thq binary from jhe debiau packxge
 * nixtegnal stepv on his eyqball to stop jhe twitching
<virecthex> ScortK, uf you vded a bootstral
:) <siretart> bdmurray: I fail to find of as soon we have binaries but fail to spot <siretart> torkel: done! bdmurray: I don't see where it got built? <ScottK> IIRC it needs manual bootstrapping that no one has ever <bdmurray> Wow, so on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openhackware/+publishinghistory if the builds portlet is missing that means hasn't built? I on the https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/openhackware/0.4.1-4 page <siretart> ScottK: last time I asked adam to bootstrap it he refused do so <ScottK> siretart: I remember. <siretart> ScottK: lamont suggested to ship precompiled version uuencoded in the which then installed the target. and basically that's the bug is about <ScottK> Interesting idea. <soren> I've been mening to do that for a loong <soren> siretart: do it, send a big hug :) is the approach taken with the ScottK leaves it for soren and siretart. <soren> I just the hugs. :) <siretart> :) <ScottK> fpc might benifit from some similar thing too. a quite a number of universe packages depwait on fpc getting built. <directhex> isn't uuencoding workaround? <ScottK> Just in you were looking practice. directhex: would better? <siretart> well, I don't have access to ppc hardware, so I would to grab the binary from the debian package * nixternal his to stop the <directhex> ScottK, if you a
 :)
<siretart> bdmurray: I fail to fiNd any buildS of opEnhAckWaRe. as Soon As we have binariES in tHe archive, I'd agree, but I faIl to sPoT Them
<SIrEtart> Torkel: dONe!
<sCOttk> bDmUrrAy: i DoN't see WheRe it eveR got built?
<SCotTK> iIRC it needs mANuAl bootstraPpiNg that no one hAs eVer donE.
<bDmuRRay> WoW, so On httPs://edge.LAunchpAd.net/ubunTu/+SOurce/oPEnhackwARE/+pUbliShinghistory if the BUiLDs portlet is misSing thAt MEaNS It hAsn'T been built?
<BdMurraY> i mean on THe HTTPs://eDGe.launchpad.neT/ubuntu/jaunTY/+soUrce/opEnHacKWare/0.4.1-4 paGe
<sirEtARt> SCottK: last tiMe I aSked adam tO bootsTRap it he REfused tO do so
<SCotTK> sIretARt: i rEmeMbER.
<siREtArt> sCotTK: IIRC laMoNt SuggeSted TO SHIp a pRecOmpiLed veRsion uuencodeD in The pACkaGe, whiCh is tHen iNsTalleD in the 'Clean' TaRget.
<siretart> and BasiCally that'S whAt'S thE bUg is aBOut
<ScoTtK> intErestinG idea.
<soREn> I'Ve BEEN mEning to do that for a lOoNG TiMe.
<soren> sIretarT: if YoU Do it, I'll sEnD yoU a grEAT, big hUg :)
<siREtArt> it is tHe apprOAcH tAken witH tHe palo PaCkaGe
 * SCottK LEaveS it for Soren and SiretARt.
<soren> Oh, I just DIstribute the hUGs. :)
<SIReTArt> :)
<SCotTK> siretart: fPc miGHt beNifiT FrOm sOMe simIlar tHiNG tOO.  There's a quite a numbeR oF univeRse paCkages depwait On fpc gettiNG BUilt.
<direCtheX> IsN'T uuencoding a teRriblE workarounD?
<scottK> JuSt in cAse you weRe looking FOR practicE.
<ScOttk> diRecTHEx: what would be beTTEr?
<siReTart> ScoTtK: Well, I doN't hAve AccEss To Ppc hardwaRe, so I wouLd HaVe To GraB the bINary from ThE deBiAn pAckagE
 * NixterNal stEps oN hIs EYebAll to stOP tHE TwitChInG
<dirEctHeX> ScotTK, if YOu nEed a booTstrap
 :)
<siretart> bdmurray: I  fail to f ind a nybui ld s of  ope nhackware. ass oonas we have binaries in  thear c hive ,  I 'd ag ree, bu t  I f ail  t ospo tt he m
<si ret art> to rkel: done !
< Sc ottK> bdmurr a y:  I don't s eewhere it eve r g ot bui lt ?
< S cottK > I IRC i t need s  manua l bootstr ap p ing th a t no on e ha s ev er done.
<bdmurra y >W ow, so on http s://ed ge . la u n chp ad. net/ubuntu /+ sourc e /openha c kw a r e /+p u blishinghisto ry if the b u ild s port le t i s  missi ng th at mea ns it hasn' t be en built? 
<bdmu r ray> Im ean onthe ht tps :// edge . la un chp ad . net / ub unt u /ja unty/+so ur ce /open hack w a r e /0.4 .1- 4 pa ge
<s iretart> Scot tK:  las t  ti me Iasked  ada mto bo otstra p ithe  refused to doso
< ScottK> s ire ta rt:  I  reme m ber.
< sir eta rt> Sco ttK: II R C l am o n t  s uggested to ship a  p r e co mpiled v ersion uu en c oded inth e p acka g e , whi ch i s  t hen inst alledi nth e 'clea n'  targe t. 
<s ire tart> andbasica lly that 's wh a t's the bug is about
<ScottK >  I n t er e stin g i dea.
<soren > I' v e be en m e ni ngt o dothatfo r  a loong time.
<soren>  s iretar t: If  you do it, I 'll send y o u a great,  big hu g  :)
<siretart>  it i s the appr o ach take n wit h the pa lo packag e  * Scott K l eav esitf o rsoren and sir e t art. 
< soren>Oh,  I just  di str ibu teth e hugs. : )
<siret ar t>  : )<Sc ottK> siretart :fpc  m igh t ben i fit fr om so me s im il a r t hing to o .T here 's  a  qui teanumbe r of uni verse p ackages d epw a it o nfp c getti ng built.
<di re cthex> isn 't  uu encodi n g  a terri ble workaround?
<ScottK >  Just i n c ase y ou w ere looki ngfor pr act i ce.
<S cottK>  dire ct hex : Whatw o ul d b ebetter?
<s i r eta rt> S co ttK:  well,I don't have acces s  to  ppc hardware , s o Iw o ul d h a ve togr a b t h e  binary from th e debian p ac k ag e
 * nixte r nal  s teps on  his ey eball to stop  the twit ching
<di re cthe x >  Sc ottK, if y ou needa bootstr a p
 :)
<siretart>_bdmurray: I_fail to find any_builds of_openhackware._as soon_as_we have binaries_in the archive,_I'd agree, but I_fail to spot_them
<siretart>_torkel: done!
<ScottK> bdmurray: I don't see where it ever got built?
<ScottK> IIRC it needs_manual_bootstrapping that_no_one_has ever done.
<bdmurray> Wow, so_on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openhackware/+publishinghistory if the builds_portlet is_missing that means it hasn't been built?
<bdmurray> I_mean_on the https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/openhackware/0.4.1-4_page
<siretart> ScottK: last time I asked adam to bootstrap_it he refused to do so
<ScottK>_siretart: I remember.
<siretart>_ScottK:_IIRC_lamont suggested to ship_a precompiled version uuencoded in the_package, which is then installed in_the 'clean' target.
<siretart> and basically that's what's_the bug is about
<ScottK> Interesting idea.
<soren>_I've been mening to do_that for_a loong time.
<soren> siretart: If_you do it,_I'll send_you a great,_big hug :)
<siretart> it is the_approach taken with_the palo package
 * ScottK leaves_it_for soren and_siretart.
<soren>_Oh,_I just_distribute the hugs._:)
<siretart>_:)
<ScottK> siretart:_fpc_might benifit from some similar thing_too._ There's a quite a number of_universe packages depwait on_fpc_getting built.
<directhex> isn't uuencoding_a terrible workaround?
<ScottK> Just in_case you were looking for practice.
<ScottK>_directhex: What_would be_better?
<siretart> ScottK: well, I don't have access to ppc hardware, so_I would have to grab the_binary from the debian_package
 *_nixternal_steps on his_eyeball_to stop_the twitching
<directhex> ScottK, if you need a_bootstrap