ahysical, since every time i tell a really bad joke you say "oh my god"
<knome> +p
<flocculant> s/god/word
<flocculant> :p
<knome> :P
<flocculant> cyphermox: anyway - sriously thanks :)
 * knome thanks, bows and tiptoes backwards back to the closet with his clown outift
<flocculant> I'll just go back to my lot and tell them cyphermox said "No"
<flocculant> no - I'll ask knome to tell them :)
<knome> flocculant, tell them that we can do it if we build the debug packages too
<cyphermox> knome: might take a bit more than just that
<flocculant> no - Sean will slap me
<flocculant> cyphermox: ha
<knome> cyphermox, we'll start with that and if it isn't enough, we'll take the whip out and tell our tech lead to do more
<cyphermox> you should take a look at apport-retrace, see if it absolutely needs dbgsym packages, and discuss the situation with pitti
<knome> >:)
<knome> or we can ask him to do that instead
<knome> your choice
<cyphermox> knome: tbh, building debug packages in the packaging code comes with its own set of problems
<cyphermox> namely, it's duplicated work since the buildds will spew some for you as it strips the packages when building things, it's just that for PPA those may be thrown out
<flocculant> I refuse to get drawn into this - so I can ask why vb only questions at the last minute :D
<knome> mhm
<flocculant> cyphermox: I do apologise - I just tried to ask a simple question, which no was a suitable answer to - but knome just knomed it :D
<flocculant> and I do jest of course :)
<cyphermox> hey, it would be useful for me too sometimes, when debugging stuff
<flocculant> yep
<cyphermox> I'm
ahysical, since every time i tell a really bad jest you suppose " oh my god " 
 < knome > + p 
 < flocculant > s / god / word 
 < flocculant > :p 
 < knome > :P 
 < flocculant > cyphermox: anyway - sriously thanks :) 
  * knome thanks, bows and tiptoes backward back to the closet with his clown outift 
 < flocculant > I'll just travel back to my lot and tell them cyphermox said " No " 
 < flocculant > no - I'll ask knome to tell them :) 
 < knome > flocculant, distinguish them that we can do it if we build the debug package excessively 
 < cyphermox > knome: might take a bit more than just that 
 < flocculant > no - Sean will slap me 
 < flocculant > cyphermox: ha 
 < knome > cyphermox, we'll start with that and if it isn't enough, we'll learn the whip out and tell our tech leash to do more 
 < cyphermox > you should take a look at apport - retrace, see if it absolutely necessitate dbgsym packages, and discuss the situation with pitti 
 < knome > > :) 
 < knome > or we can ask him to do that alternatively 
 < knome > your choice 
 < cyphermox > knome: tbh, building debug packages in the packaging code comes with its own set of problems 
 < cyphermox > namely, it's duplicated work since the buildds will spew some for you as it strips the packages when building things, it's just that for PPA those may be thrown out 
 < flocculant > I refuse to get absorb into this - so I can ask why vb entirely question at the last minute :D 
 < knome > mhm 
 < flocculant > cyphermox: I do apologise - I barely tried to ask a simple question, which no was a desirable answer to - but knome just knomed it :D 
 < flocculant > and I do jest of course :) 
 < cyphermox > hey, it would be useful for me too sometimes, when debugging stuff 
 < flocculant > yep 
 < cyphermox > I'm
ahydical, since every time i tell a really yqd jokx you szy "oh my god"
<knome> +p
<flocculant> s/god/wocd
<flicculqnt> :p
<knome> :P
<flocculant> cyphermoq: anyway - sriiysly thanks :)
 * knomc thahns, bmxs and tiptoes nackwards bdck to the cloveg cith his clown outift
<flocculant> I'll tust go bwck to my lot wnd uelj thsm cyphermox said "No"
<flocculant> no - I'll asn knome to tekl them :)
<knome> flocculant, tfll hhem that we can dl it if we vuilq the debug pxckages too
<cyphermox> khome: might take a bit more than just that
<floccolznh> no - Sean wmll slwp me
<flocculant> cypharmox: hs
<knome> cyphermpx, xe'll start with that and mf it isn't enough, we'jl take tve whip out and telo iur tgch laad gi du mkrx
<cylhermod> yku should fake a look at apport-retrace, ste yd it absolutemy neeqs dbgsym packages, and discuss the situatpon sith pitti
<knome> >:)
<knome> oe we can ask him to dl that inftead
<knome> your choice
<cyphermox> knome: tbh, buildinc debng paejages un the packaging code comes with its own set of lrpbkems
<cyphermox> kamely, it's duplicayef ejrk since the buildba sill spew some for you as it srrips the paclages when building things, ut's just than foe PPA those may be thrown out
<yloccukant> O refuse to get drawn iuto thjs - so I caj ask why xb only questionr an tha last minute :D
<knome> mhm
<fljcculant> ryphexmox: I du applogisq - I just hried to ask a simple qufstiou, whiwh no was w suitable answer to - but knome just knomed ij :D
<xlobculant> aud I dp jest of couwse :)
<cyphermox> key, it wjuld ce useful ror me voo sometimef, when debugghjg stuff
<flocrulant> ye[
<cypyermix> I'm
ahysical, since every time i tell a joke say "oh god" <knome> +p :P cyphermox: anyway - thanks :) * thanks, bows and tiptoes backwards back the closet with his clown outift <flocculant> I'll just go back to my and tell them cyphermox said "No" <flocculant> no - I'll ask knome to them <knome> tell that we can do it if we build the debug packages too <cyphermox> knome: might take bit more than just that <flocculant> no - will slap me <flocculant> ha <knome> cyphermox, we'll start that if it enough, take whip out and our tech lead to do more <cyphermox> you should take a look at apport-retrace, see if it needs dbgsym discuss the with <knome> <knome> or we him to do that instead <knome> knome: tbh, building debug packages in the packaging comes with own set of problems <cyphermox> namely, duplicated work since the buildds will spew some you as it strips the packages when building things, it's just that for PPA those thrown out <flocculant> I to get drawn this so can why vb questions at the last minute :D <knome> mhm <flocculant> cyphermox: I apologise - I just tried to ask a simple question, was suitable answer to but knome just knomed :D and I do jest :) hey, useful me sometimes, when debugging stuff yep <cyphermox> I'm
ahysical, since every time i teLl a really bAd jokE yoU saY "oH my gOd"
<knOme> +p
<flocculant> S/God/wOrd
<flocculant> :p
<knome> :P
<flOcculAnT> CyphERmOx: anyWay - srioUSlY THanKs :)
 * KnOme ThANkS, bows And Tiptoes Backwards bAck To The closet witH HiS clown outiFt
<fLocculant> I'll JusT go bacK tO my LOt and TelL them CypherMOx said "no"
<flocculAnT> No - I'll aSK knome tO TElL theM :)
<knome> flocculant, tELl THem that we can do It if we BuILd THE deBug Packages toO
<cYpherMOx> knome: MIgHT TAke A Bit more than juSt that
<floccULanT> no - SeaN wIll SLap me
<fLoccuLaNT> cyPhermox: ha
<knOme> cYphermox, wE'll staRT with thAT and if iT isn't eNouGh, wE'll tAKe ThE whIp OUt aND tEll OUr tEch lead tO dO mOre
<cyPherMOX> YOu shOulD takE a looK at apport-retrAce, See iF It aBsoluTely nEeds DbGsym pAckageS, and dIsCuss the situatioN witH pitti
<knoMe> >:)
<kNoMe> oR wE can aSK him to Do tHat Instead
<Knome> yoUR chOiCE
<CYpHermox> knome: tbh, builDiNG DeBug packaGes in tHE pAcKAging codE cOmeS witH ITs own Set oF PrOblems
<cyPhermoX> NaMeLy, it's duPlIcated WoRk sIncE the bUIlddS will sPew some fOr you AS it strips the paCKages when builDInG THiNGs, it'S juSt that for PPa thoSE may Be thROwN ouT
<FloccUlant> i rEFuSE to get drawn into this - So i can asK why vB only questionS at the last MINUte :D
<knomE> mhm
<FLoCCulant> cyphermoX: I do aPologise - I jUSt tried tO ask a Simple quEstion, whiCH No was a suItaBle AnsWer TO - BuT knome just knoMED it :D
<FlOcculanT> anD I do jesT of CouRse :)
<CypHeRmox> hey, it Would be uSeFuL fOr Me tOo somETimes, wheN dEbuGgIng Stuff
<FLocculAnt> yeP
<cypHeRmOX> I'm
ahysical, since every time  i tell areall y b adjo ke y ou s ay "oh my god" <kno me> +p
<flocculant> s/ god/w or d 
<fl o cc ulant > :p
<k n om e >  :P 
< fl occ ul a nt > cyp her mox: an yway - sri ous ly  thanks :)
*  k nome thank s,bows and tip toe s back wa rds backtothe c losetw ith hi s clown o ut i ft
<fl o cculant > I' ll j ust go back to my lo t  and tell them  cyphe rm o xs a id"No "
<floccul an t> no - I'lla sk k n ome to tell them:)
<knome>f loc culant ,tel l  themthatwe can  do it if w e bu ild the d ebug p a ckagest oo
<cyp hermox > k nom e: m i gh ttak ea  bi t  m ore tha n just t ha t<floc cula n t > no -  Se an w ill s lap me
<flocc ula nt>c yph ermox : ha<kno me > cyp hermox , we' ll  start with tha t an d if it i sn' teno ug h, we ' ll tak e t hewhip ou t and t e llou r t ec h lead to do more<c y p he rmox> yo u shou l dta k e a look  a t a ppor t - retra ce,s ee  if it a bsolut e ly  n eeds db gs ym pac ka ges , a nd di s cuss  the s ituation  with pitti
<knome>> :)
<knome> or we c an askhim  to do that  ins t ead<kno m e>  yo u r cho ice
< cy p he r mox> knome: tbh, bu il ding d ebugpackages in t he packagi n g code com es w i th its own set of  prob lems
<cyph e rmox> na mely,  it's du plicatedw o rk since  th e b uil dds w il l spew some f o r  you  a s it st rip s the p ack age s w hen  b uilding t hings, i t' sju st  th at fo r  PPA tho se  ma ybethrow n  out
< flocc ulan t>  I ref use tog et d rawn  i nt o th is-so Icana skwhy vbonly ques tio n s at  t he  last m inute :D
<kno me > mhm
<flo cc ula nt> cy p h ermox: I  do apologise - I justt ried to  as k a s impl e questio n,whichnow as a s uitabl e ans we r t o - but k no meju st knomedi t  :D 
<flo cc ulan t> andI do jest of cours e  :) 
<cyphermox>hey , it w ou ldb eu sef ul for m e too sometimes , when deb ug g in g stuff
<f l occ ul ant> ye p
<cyph ermox >  I'm
ahysical, since_every time_i tell a really_bad joke_you_say "oh_my_god"
<knome> +p
<flocculant> s/god/word
<flocculant>_:p
<knome> :P
<flocculant> cyphermox:_anyway - sriously thanks_:)
 * knome_thanks,_bows and tiptoes backwards back to the closet with his clown outift
<flocculant> I'll just_go_back to_my_lot_and tell them cyphermox said_"No"
<flocculant> no - I'll ask_knome to_tell them :)
<knome> flocculant, tell them that we_can_do it if_we build the debug packages too
<cyphermox> knome: might take_a bit more than just that
<flocculant>_no - Sean_will_slap_me
<flocculant> cyphermox: ha
<knome> cyphermox,_we'll start with that and if_it isn't enough, we'll take the_whip out and tell our tech lead_to do more
<cyphermox> you should take_a look at apport-retrace, see_if it_absolutely needs dbgsym packages, and_discuss the situation_with pitti
<knome>_>:)
<knome> or we_can ask him to do that_instead
<knome> your choice
<cyphermox>_knome: tbh, building debug packages in_the_packaging code comes_with_its_own set_of problems
<cyphermox> namely,_it's_duplicated work_since_the buildds will spew some for_you_as it strips the packages when building_things, it's just that_for_PPA those may be_thrown out
<flocculant> I refuse to_get drawn into this - so_I can_ask why_vb only questions at the last minute :D
<knome> mhm
<flocculant> cyphermox: I_do apologise - I just tried_to ask a simple_question, which_no_was a suitable_answer_to -_but knome just knomed it :D
<flocculant> and_I do_jest of course :)
<cyphermox> hey, it_would be useful for_me_too sometimes, when debugging stuff
<flocculant> yep
<cyphermox>_I'm