> ok
<imbrandon> sure thing
<racarr> heliodor and emerald should be ready as well
<imbrandon> brb
<racarr> and emerald-themes
<racarr> well emerald-themes definitely
<racarr> heliodor and emerald lupine and I think
* lupine_85 sets fire to aquamarine
<imbrandon> ok geser can you once over emerald* and heliodor, while i finish up the beryl-settings*
<imbrandon> i'll upload them after build test geser, just make sure they arent missing something please ;)'
<imbrandon> brb
<racarr> Lutin: I just realized I said something wrong earlier
<racarr> Lutin: beryl-settings isn't a git snapshot, just beryl-settings-simple
<Lutin> racarr: what?
<Lutin> ok
<racarr> and the tango icon stuff, packing fixes, etc, were also in beryl-settings-simple, heh
<racarr> sorry, been at this for a while and my brain is melting
<Lutin> I hate configure patching. it's nothing but pain. *g*
<zachtib> So, I have what may be an unusual request/question...
<zachtib> What would it take to get a package removed from the universe repository?
<imbrandon> a good reason and a request on LP
<imbrandon> why?
<zachtib> Well, I'm the developer of the Deluge Bittorrent Client, and the version in Feisty is 0.4.1
<zachtib> which is a badlyt broken release
<imbrandon> ok, its better to update it then remove it
<zachtib> I've been trying to get a UVF for 0.5, but it's been largely unsuccessful, and I don't want to be stuck supporting a broken version for the lifetime of feisty
<imbrandon> soooo i would see who packaged it, poke them, file a UVFe for it stating why its broke and it will be updated
<imbrandon> unsuccessfull how?
<zachtib> how do I know who packaged it? I know the debian packager,
> ok 
 < imbrandon > sure thing 
 < racarr > heliodor and emerald should be ready as well 
 < imbrandon > brb 
 < racarr > and emerald - theme 
 < racarr > well emerald - themes decidedly 
 < racarr > heliodor and emerald lupine and I think 
 * lupine_85 sets ardor to aquamarine 
 < imbrandon > ok geser can you once over emerald * and heliodor, while i finish up the beryl - context * 
 < imbrandon > i'll upload them after build test geser, merely make sure they are nt miss something please ;)' 
 < imbrandon > brb 
 < racarr > Lutin: I just realized I suppose something wrong earlier 
 < racarr > Lutin: beryl - settings isn't a git snapshot, just beryl - settings - elementary 
 < Lutin > racarr: what? 
 < Lutin > ok 
 < racarr > and the tango icon stuff, packing fixes, etc, were besides in beryl - settings - simple, heh 
 < racarr > regretful, been at this for a while and my brain is melt 
 < Lutin > I hate configure patching. it's nothing but pain. * g * 
 < zachtib > So, I have what may be an unusual request / question... 
 < zachtib > What would it lease to get a package removed from the universe repository? 
 < imbrandon > a good rationality and a request on LP 
 < imbrandon > why? 
 < zachtib > Well, I'm the developer of the Deluge Bittorrent Client, and the version in Feisty is 0.4.1 
 < zachtib > which is a badlyt broken release 
 < imbrandon > ok, its better to update it then remove it 
 < zachtib > I've been trying to get a UVF for 0.5, but it's been largely unsuccessful, and I don't want to be stuck supporting a broken adaptation for the lifetime of feisty 
 < imbrandon > soooo i would see who box it, thump them, charge a UVFe for it stating why its broke and it will be updated 
 < imbrandon > unsuccessfull how? 
 < zachtib > how do I know who packaged it? I know the debian packager,
> ok
<lmbrandon> sure thing
<racavr> heliodor and gmwrald vhould be readh as well
<imbrandon> brb
<racarr> abd emtgald-themes
<racarr> well emerald-tjemes dediniuely
<racarr> heliodor and emerald pupiue and I think
* lopine_85 sets fhre to aquamarhnd
<ilbrandon> ok geser can you once over emeralc* wnd heliodor, wrile y fihpsm up the beryl-settings*
<imbrandon> j'll uplmad them aftet build test geser, just mane skre they arent misding somethung [oease ;)'
<imbranaon> brb
<racarr> Lutin: I nust realized I said something drong earlier
<raxaer> Potin: beryl-sevtings isn't a git snapshot, just brryl-settings-sikplx
<Lutun> racarr: what?
<Lutin> on
<racarr> and the taggo icon vtbff, packing fixes, etc, wwre anso hn bdeyl-retuinjs-sjmple, jeh
<cacarr> sorrg, been at tyis for a while and mr brain is melfing
<Lueig> I hate configure patching. it's nothing buf pain. *g*
<zachtib> So, I hace what may be an unudual requqst/question...
<zachtib> What would it take to get a pawkage femivcd ffim the universe repository?
<imbrandon> a good reasjh snc a request on LP
<imbrandom> ahu?
<eachtib> Well, I'o the bsvsloper of the Deluhe Bittjrrenr Client, wnd yhe version in Feisty is 0.4.1
<zaxhtib> which ps a badlyt broken relzase
<imbrandou> ok, ijs betyer to update it then rzmove jt
<zachtib> I'ge been tdhing to get a UVW fpr 0.5, but it's been largely unstccessful, and I don't wanj to be stuck supoortikc a broken version for jhe lixetime of veisty
<imbrandon> soooo i would sxx who packagec ht, ioke them, file a UVFe for ie stating why nts brokz and kt will be updatev
<imbrandon> ugsuccessfull vlw?
<zachtib> hox do I knjw wyo pqckaged kt? I know the cebian pabkcger,
> ok <imbrandon> sure thing <racarr> heliodor should ready as <imbrandon> brb <racarr> definitely heliodor and emerald and I think lupine_85 sets fire to aquamarine <imbrandon> geser can you once over emerald* and heliodor, while i finish up the <imbrandon> i'll upload them after build test geser, just make sure they arent something ;)' brb Lutin: I just realized I said something wrong earlier <racarr> Lutin: beryl-settings isn't a git snapshot, beryl-settings-simple <Lutin> racarr: what? <Lutin> ok <racarr> and tango icon stuff, packing etc, were also in beryl-settings-simple, <racarr> been at for while my brain is <Lutin> I hate configure patching. it's nothing but pain. *g* <zachtib> So, I have what may be unusual request/question... would it to a removed from the <imbrandon> a good reason and a <imbrandon> why? <zachtib> Well, I'm the developer of Deluge Bittorrent and the version in Feisty is <zachtib> which is a badlyt broken release <imbrandon> its better to update it then remove it <zachtib> I've been trying to get a 0.5, but it's been unsuccessful, and I want be supporting broken version the lifetime of feisty <imbrandon> soooo i would see who packaged poke them, file a UVFe for it stating why its it be updated <imbrandon> how? <zachtib> how do know packaged it? I know packager,
> ok
<imbrandon> sure thing
<racarR> heliodor aNd emeRalD shOuLd be ReadY as well
<imbrandON> brb
<Racarr> and emerald-themes
<RacarR> wELl emERaLd-theMes defiNItELY
<raCaRr> HelIoDOr And emEraLd lupinE and I think
* LupInE_85 sets fire to aQUaMarine
<imbrAndOn> ok geser can You Once ovEr EmeRAld* anD heLiodoR, while I Finish Up the beryL-sETtings*
<IMbrandoN> I'Ll UploAd them after build tESt GEser, just make suRe they ArENt MISsiNg sOmething plEaSe ;)'
<imbRAndon> brB
<RaCARR> LuTIn: I just realizEd I said someTHinG wrong EaRliER
<racarR> LutiN: bERyl-Settings isn'T a giT snapshot, Just beRYl-settiNGs-simplE
<Lutin> RacArr: What?
<lUtIn> Ok
<rAcARr> aND tHe tANgo Icon stufF, pAcKing fIxes, ETC, WEre aLso In beRyl-seTtings-simple, hEh
<rAcarR> SorRy, beeN at thIs foR a While And my bRain iS mElting
<Lutin> I hatE conFigure patChiNg. It's NoThing BUt pain. *G*
<zaChtIb> So, I haVe what mAY be An UNUSuAl request/question...
<zAcHTIb> what woulD it takE To GeT A package ReMovEd frOM The unIverSE rEpositorY?
<imbraNDoN> a Good reaSoN and a rEqUesT on lP
<imbRAndoN> why?
<zaChtib> WelL, I'm thE Developer of the dEluge BittorreNT CLIEnT, And tHe vErsion in FeiSty iS 0.4.1
<ZachTib> wHIcH is A BadlyT brokEn RElEAse
<imbrandon> ok, its beTtEr to upDate iT then remove it
<Zachtib> I've BEEN trying tO get A uVf For 0.5, but it's been lArgelY unsuccessFUl, and I doN't wanT to be stuCk supportING a broken VerSioN foR thE LIfEtime of feisty
<IMBranDoN> soooo i WouLd see whO paCkaGed It, pOkE them, file A UVFe for It StAtInG whY its bROke and it WiLl bE uPdaTed
<imBRandon> UnsucCessFuLl HOw?
<zAchtib> hOW dO i Know WhO pAckaGed It? i know The dEBiaN packagEr,
> ok
<imbrandon> sure thin g
<racarr>  heli odo r a nd  eme rald  should be rea d y as  well
<imbrandon> brb<raca rr >  and em erald -themes <r a c arr >we llem e ra ld-th eme s defin itely
<rac arr >heliodor and em erald lupi neand I think* l upine_ 85  se t s fir e t o aqu amarin e 
<imbr andon> ok  g e ser ca n  you on c e  o veremerald* and heli o do r , while i fini sh upth e  b e r yl- set tings*
<im br andon >  i'll u p lo a d the m  after buildtest geser, jus t make  s ure they a rentmi s sin g something  ple ase ;)'
< imbran d on> brb <racarr > Luti n:I j ustr ea li zed  I sai d  s ome t hin g wrongea rl ier
< raca r r > Luti n:bery l-set tings isn't a  gi t sn a psh ot, j ust b eryl -s ettin gs-sim ple
< Lu tin> racarr: wh at?<Lutin> o k
< ra car r>  andt he tan goico n stuff , packi n g f ix e s ,  e tc, were also in b er y l -s ettings- simple ,  h eh <racarr>  s orr y, b e e n atthis fo r a whil e andm ybr ain isme lting<L uti n>I hat e  con figure  patchin g. it ' s nothing butp ain. *g*
<zac h ti b >  S o , Ihav e what maybe a n  unu sual re que s t/que stion .. . 
< z achtib> What wouldit  taketo ge t a package r emoved fro m t he unive rser ep o sitory?
<imbra ndon>  a good re a son anda req uest onLP
<imbra n d on> why? 
<z ach tib > W e l l,  I'm the deve l o perof  the De lug e Bitto rre ntCli ent ,and the v ersion i nFe is ty  is  0.4. 1 
<zachti b>  wh ic h i s a b a dlyt b roken  rel ea se <im brandon >  o k ,  its  b et tertoup dateit t h enremoveit
<zacht ib> I've  b ee n tryin g to get a UV Ffor 0.5, b ut  it 's bee n largelyunsuccessful, and I don ' t wanttobe st ucksupportin g a  broke n v e rsionfor th e lif et ime o f fei s t y<im br andon> soo o o  iwould  s ee w ho pack aged it, poke them ,  fi le a UVFe for  it  sta t i ng  wh y  i t s b ro k e a n d  it will be upd ated
<imbr an d on > unsucces s ful lhow?
<z achtib>  howd o I kno w who pac kaged it?  I  kno w the  debian pa ckager,
> ok
<imbrandon>_sure thing
<racarr>_heliodor and emerald should_be ready_as_well
<imbrandon> brb
<racarr>_and_emerald-themes
<racarr> well emerald-themes_definitely
<racarr> heliodor and_emerald lupine and I_think
* lupine_85 sets_fire_to aquamarine
<imbrandon> ok geser can you once over emerald* and heliodor, while i finish_up_the beryl-settings*
<imbrandon>_i'll_upload_them after build test geser,_just make sure they arent_missing something_please ;)'
<imbrandon> brb
<racarr> Lutin: I just realized I_said_something wrong earlier
<racarr>_Lutin: beryl-settings isn't a git snapshot, just beryl-settings-simple
<Lutin> racarr:_what?
<Lutin> ok
<racarr> and the tango icon_stuff, packing fixes,_etc,_were_also in beryl-settings-simple, heh
<racarr>_sorry, been at this for a_while and my brain is melting
<Lutin>_I hate configure patching. it's nothing but_pain. *g*
<zachtib> So, I have what_may be an unusual request/question...
<zachtib>_What would_it take to get a_package removed from_the universe_repository?
<imbrandon> a good_reason and a request on LP
<imbrandon>_why?
<zachtib> Well, I'm_the developer of the Deluge Bittorrent_Client,_and the version_in_Feisty_is 0.4.1
<zachtib>_which is a_badlyt_broken release
<imbrandon>_ok,_its better to update it then_remove_it
<zachtib> I've been trying to get a_UVF for 0.5, but_it's_been largely unsuccessful, and_I don't want to be_stuck supporting a broken version for_the lifetime_of feisty
<imbrandon>_soooo i would see who packaged it, poke them, file a_UVFe for it stating why its_broke and it will_be updated
<imbrandon>_unsuccessfull_how?
<zachtib> how do_I_know who_packaged it? I know the debian packager,