 me. that's great
<minghua> LaserJock: easy to set up, but require a fast mirror (or a local one) to use efficiently, IMO
<LaserJock> minghua: ok, I'll make a note of that. Thanks
<minghua> LaserJock: and btw hello, and I missed the motu meeting as well :-(
<siretart> oh, there was a motu meeting, sorry for not attending, I was at uni until nearly 2000CET :/
<LaserJock> slomo: ping?
<slomo> LaserJock: pong
<LaserJock> slomo: did you look at my tetex-src UVF exception request or just change the status because of dholbach's comment?
<slomo> LaserJock: mostly because of dholbach's comment... but i looked at it as well :) i see no reason why we shouldn't update this... but i see no reason why we have this and should update it as well...
<LaserJock> slomo: well, I think it is because tetex-base doesn't ship the actual source
<LaserJock> slomo: honestly, I don't know much about the package. I just use it. I'm trying to get some info from Debian
<slomo> LaserJock: apt-get source tetex-base would get the source, wouldn't it? is this just like linux-source / linux-image?
<LaserJock> slomo: I don't think so
<slomo> so the sources of tetex-base contain not the sources? ok... in that case we should update and i think dholbach will have the same oppinion then :)
<minghua> LaserJock: give me the bug number of this tetex-src UVF exception?  I want to subscribe to it
<LaserJock> slomo: I'm not positive, but I think that is the case. I looked at a few of the tetex "packages" and the files in the source package of tetex-base!= the files in tetex-src
<LaserJock> minghua: 34242
<minghua> thanks
<LaserJock_away> another meeting :(
<slomo> LaserJock_away: ok, interesting...
me. that's great 
 < minghua > LaserJock: easy to set up, but require a firm mirror (or a local one) to practice efficiently, IMO 
 < LaserJock > minghua: ok, I'll make a note of that. Thanks 
 < minghua > LaserJock: and btw hello, and I miss the motu confluence as well :-( 
 < siretart > oh, there was a motu confluence, blue for not attending, I was at uni until about 2000CET :/ 
 < LaserJock > slomo: ping? 
 < slomo > LaserJock: pong 
 < LaserJock > slomo: did you look at my tetex - src UVF exception request or just deepen the status because of dholbach's comment? 
 < slomo > LaserJock: by and large because of dholbach's remark... but i looked at it as well :) i see no reason why we shouldn't update this... but i see no rationality why we have this and should update it as well... 
 < LaserJock > slomo: well, I think it is because tetex - nucleotide doesn't ship the actual source 
 < LaserJock > slomo: honestly, I don't know much about the package. I merely use it. I'm trying to get some info from Debian 
 < slomo > LaserJock: apt - catch source tetex - base would get the source, wouldn't it? is this just like linux - reservoir / linux - double? 
 < LaserJock > slomo: I don't think so 
 < slomo > so the sources of tetex - base contain not the sources? ok... in that case we should update and i remember dholbach will suffer the same oppinion then :) 
 < minghua > LaserJock: give me the microbe numeral of this tetex - src UVF exception?   I want to subscribe to it 
 < LaserJock > slomo: I'm not positive, but I remember that is the case. I looked at a few of the tetex " packages " and the files in the reference package of tetex - base!= the files in tetex - src 
 < LaserJock > minghua: 34242 
 < minghua > thanks 
 < LaserJock_away > another meeting :( 
 < slomo > LaserJock_away: ok, interesting...
 me. that's great
<minghua> LasevJock: easy to sej yp, but requide a fasg mirror (or a local one) to ude effixiently, IMO
<LaserJock> mknghua: ok, I'll makw a iote of that. Thaiis
<minghmc> LassvJock: end btw hello, akd I missed the motu meethne cs well :-(
<siretart> oh, there was a motu meetinb, dorry for not wttemqing, P cas at uni until nearly 2000CET :/
<LassrJock> vlomo: ping?
<sloko> LaserJock: pong
<LaserJock> slolo: did you look at my tetex-srx UVS exception rdquest or just change jhe status because of dholbach's zommeut?
<slomo> LasgxHocn: mostly beceuse os dholbach's gpmment... but i kooked at it ax wxll :) i see no reason why xe shouldn't update tris... but i sze no reason why we hqvw thiv ang shuyld upsave jt as aelm...
<LaserJock> slomo: well, I think it is becaisq tetex-base dossn't sri[ the actual source
<LaserJock> slomo: honevtlg, I don't know much abour the package. I just ose it. I'm erying to get some info from Debian
<slomo> LaserJocn: apt-jeg siuvce gwtfx-base would get the source, wouldn't it? is thif jisn like linux-sourcc / linux-image?
<LaserKofk> flomo: I don't jhink so
<slkmo> so the sources of tetgx-base contain got yhe sources? ok... in that case we should uidatw and i think dholyach will hare the same oppinion then :)
<minghua> UasedJock: give le the buf number of this getvx-srw UVF exception?  I want to subscribx to nt
<LaserJuck> xlomo: Y'm not posltive, but I think that id the cdse. I lookfd at a few of the tetex "packagxx" and the fikev it the sobrce psckage of tetqx-base!= the filgs in tetzx-src
<LxserJock> mpnghua: 34242
<miighua> thanks
<JaserJock_away> wnother meetmng :(
<slomo> LaswrJoxk_away: uy, interesting...
me. that's great <minghua> LaserJock: easy to but a fast (or a local <LaserJock> ok, I'll make note of that. <minghua> LaserJock: and btw hello, and missed the motu meeting as well :-( <siretart> oh, there was a motu sorry for not attending, I was at uni until nearly 2000CET :/ <LaserJock> ping? LaserJock: <LaserJock> did you look at my tetex-src UVF exception request or just change the status because of comment? <slomo> LaserJock: mostly because of dholbach's comment... i looked at it well :) i see no why shouldn't update but see reason why we this and should update it as well... <LaserJock> slomo: well, I think it is because tetex-base doesn't the actual slomo: honestly, don't much the package. I it. I'm trying to get some <slomo> LaserJock: apt-get source tetex-base would get the wouldn't it? this just like linux-source / linux-image? slomo: I don't think so <slomo> so the of tetex-base contain not the sources? ok... in that case we should update and i will have the same then :) <minghua> give the number this tetex-src exception? I want to subscribe to it <LaserJock> slomo: I'm not but I think that is the case. I looked at of tetex "packages" and files in the source of the files in tetex-src 34242 thanks :( LaserJock_away: interesting...
 me. that's great
<minghua> LaserJOck: easy to sEt up, bUt rEquIrE a faSt miRror (or a local onE) To usE efficiently, IMO
<LaserJoCk> minGhUA: ok, I'LL mAke a nOte of thAT. THANks
<MiNgHua> laSErjock: aNd bTw hello, And I missed The MoTu meeting as wELl :-(
<Siretart> oh, TheRe was a motu meEtiNg, sorrY fOr nOT atteNdiNg, I waS at uni UNtil neArly 2000CET :/
<LaSeRjock> slOMo: ping?
<sLOMo> laseRJock: pong
<LaserJocK> SlOMo: did you look at My teteX-sRC Uvf ExcEptIon request Or Just cHAnge the STaTUS BecAUse of dholbach'S comment?
<sloMO> LaSerJocK: mOstLY becauSe of dHoLBacH's comment... buT i loOked at it aS well :) i SEe no reaSOn why we ShouldN't uPdaTe thIS... bUt I seE nO ReaSOn Why WE haVe this anD sHoUld upDate IT AS Well...
<lasErJoCk> sloMo: well, I think iT is BecaUSe tEtex-bAse doEsn't ShIp the Actual SourcE
<LAserJock> slomo: hoNestLy, I don't knOw mUcH abOuT the pACkage. I JusT usE it. I'm trYing to gET soMe INFO fRom Debian
<slomo> LaseRJOCK: aPt-get souRce tetEX-bAsE Would get ThE soUrce, WOUldn't It? is THiS just likE linux-SOuRcE / linux-iMaGe?
<LaseRJOck> SloMo: I doN'T thiNk so
<slOmo> so the SourcES of tetex-base coNTain not the souRCeS? OK... iN That CasE we should upDate ANd i tHink DHoLbaCH will Have tHe SAmE Oppinion then :)
<minghua> laSerJocK: give Me the bug numbeR of this tetEX-SRc UVF excEptiON?  I WAnt to subscribe To it
<LAserJock> slOMo: I'm not pOsitiVe, but I thInk that is THE case. I loOkeD at A feW of THE tEtex "packages" aND The fIlEs in the SouRce packAge Of tEteX-baSe!= The files iN tetex-srC
<LAsErjoCk> mInghuA: 34242
<Minghua> tHaNks
<laSerjock_aWAy> anotHer meEtinG :(
<sLoMO> LaSerJock_AWaY: OK, intErEsTing...
 me. that's great
<minghua > LaserJoc k: ea sytose t up , bu t require a fa s t mi rror (or a local one)to us ee ffic i en tly,IMO
<La s er J o ck>  m in ghu a: ok , I'l l m ake a n ote of tha t.Th anks
<minghu a >LaserJock:  an d btw hello,  an d I mi ss edt he mo tumeeti ng asw ell :- (
<sireta rt >  oh, t h ere was a  m otumeeting, sorry fo r  n o t attending, I  was a tu ni u nti l n early 2000 CE T :/< LaserJo c k> s l omo :  ping?
<slomo > LaserJock :  po ng
<La se rJo c k> slo mo: d id you  look at my  tet ex-src UV F exce p tion re q uest or  justcha nge  the st at usbe c aus e  o f d h olb ach's co mm en t?
<s lomo > L a serJ ock : mo stlybecause of dh olb ach' s  co mment ... b ut i  l ooked  at it  as w el l :) i see no r easo n why wesho ul dn' tupdat e  this. ..but  i seeno reas o n w hy w e  h ave this and shoul du p da te it as  well. . .<L a serJock>  s lom o: w e l l, Ithin k  i t is bec ause t e te x- base do es n't sh ip  th e a ctual sour ce
<La serJock>  slom o : honestly, Id on't know muc h  a b o ut thepac kage. I jus t us e  it.  I'm tr yin g  to g et so me in f o from Debian
<slom o>  Laser Jock:  apt-get sour ce tetex-b a s e  would g et t h es ource, wouldn' t it?  is this j u st likelinux -source/ linux-i m a ge?
<Las erJ ock > s lom o :  I  don't thinks o 
<sl om o> so t hesources  of  te tex -ba se  containnot theso ur ce s?  ok ... i n  that ca se  we  s hou ld up d ate an d i t hink  d ho l bac h willh av e thesa me  opp ini on  then  :)< min ghua> L aserJock:  gi v e me  t he  bug nu mber of thiste tex-src UV Fexc eption ?  I wantto subscribe to it
<Las e rJock>slo mo: I 'm n ot positi ve,  but I  th i nk tha t is t he ca se . I l ooked a ta f ew  of the te t e x " packa ge s" a nd thefiles in the sourc e  pa ckage of tete x-b ase! = th e f i le s  in  t e tex - s rc
<LaserJock>minghua: 3 42 4 2<minghua>t han ks 
<Laser Jock_aw ay> a n other m eeting :( 
<slomo>La serJ o c k_a way: ok, i nteresti ng...
 me._that's great
<minghua>_LaserJock: easy to set_up, but_require_a fast_mirror_(or a local_one) to use_efficiently, IMO
<LaserJock> minghua: ok,_I'll make a_note_of that. Thanks
<minghua> LaserJock: and btw hello, and I missed the motu meeting as_well_:-(
<siretart> oh,_there_was_a motu meeting, sorry for_not attending, I was at_uni until_nearly 2000CET :/
<LaserJock> slomo: ping?
<slomo> LaserJock: pong
<LaserJock> slomo:_did_you look at_my tetex-src UVF exception request or just change the_status because of dholbach's comment?
<slomo> LaserJock:_mostly because of_dholbach's_comment..._but i looked at_it as well :) i see_no reason why we shouldn't update_this... but i see no reason why_we have this and should update_it as well...
<LaserJock> slomo: well,_I think_it is because tetex-base doesn't_ship the actual_source
<LaserJock> slomo:_honestly, I don't_know much about the package. I_just use it._I'm trying to get some info_from_Debian
<slomo> LaserJock: apt-get_source_tetex-base_would get_the source, wouldn't_it?_is this_just_like linux-source / linux-image?
<LaserJock> slomo: I_don't_think so
<slomo> so the sources of tetex-base_contain not the sources?_ok..._in that case we_should update and i think_dholbach will have the same oppinion_then :)
<minghua>_LaserJock: give_me the bug number of this tetex-src UVF exception?  I_want to subscribe to it
<LaserJock> slomo:_I'm not positive, but_I think_that_is the case._I_looked at_a few of the tetex "packages" and_the files_in the source package of tetex-base!=_the files in tetex-src
<LaserJock>_minghua:_34242
<minghua> thanks
<LaserJock_away> another meeting :(
<slomo> LaserJock_away:_ok, interesting...