: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard
<dolson> LaserJock: it should have IRC nicks in parentheses :)
<ogra_> dolson, i'm not :)
<marcin`> regclean
<ogra_> Mithrandir, ah, makes sense
<dolson> in the interest of bugfixes/stability, would it not make sense to release Ubuntu with each.1 release of GNOME?
<LaserJock> dolson: I suppose. mdz, Keybuck, sabdfl, and mjg 59 I think
<minghua> dolson: but I think ubuntu has been doing that since the very beginning?  (the gnome.1 releases)
<dolson> minghua:.2 then :)
<minghua> hmm, shouldn't sabdfl not allowed for voting on this since it's his proposal :-P
<dolson> releases in May/November would give time for additional GNOME bugfixes at the very least.. but meh, I don't know. I don't want any delay, I just see it happening consistantly if it happens once
<sladen> ogra_: dapper+1 will be about getting bling in, hard and fast.  Should be perfect for a 4.5 month realease cycle
<ogra_> sladen, i have a ton of postponed features pending ... i dont want them to be unstable but blingy :)
<sladen> hopefully alot of the unstability may disappear with a longer period spent cleaning up the bugs
<ogra_> not for the new stuff :)
<sladen> I'm looking at the desktop at the moment and I'm a bit disappointed with it (but that could be the latest reaction to the ubuntulooks that landed)
<ogra_> (which wasnt in dapper)
<ogra_> i'm pondering to keep the brown for edubuntu...
<ogra_> (gtk and metacity)
<ogra_> your screenshot was very convincing, dont throw that gtkrc away :)
<sladen> I have a hand-fixed diff so that I could visual the changes they made
<sladen> I was thinking of trying to get an HumanClassic into main
<sladen> with the argument and people such as schools/corporates may want to keep a consistent style if they've taught it
<
: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard 
 < dolson > LaserJock: it should have IRC nicks in parentheses :) 
 < ogra _ > dolson, i'm not :) 
 < marcin '> regclean 
 < ogra _ > Mithrandir, ah, makes common sense 
 < dolson > in the sake of bugfixes / stability, would it not make common sense to release Ubuntu with each.1 passing of GNOME? 
 < LaserJock > dolson: I suppose. mdz, Keybuck, sabdfl, and mjg 59 I intend 
 < minghua > dolson: but I intend ubuntu has been doing that since the identical beginning?   (the gnome.1 release) 
 < dolson > minghua:.2 then :) 
 < minghua > hmm, shouldn't sabdfl not allowed for vote on this since it's his proposal :-P 
 < dolson > releases in May / November would render time for additional GNOME bugfixes at the very least.. but meh, I don't know. I don't want any delay, I just see it happen consistantly if it happens once 
 < sladen > ogra _: dapper+1 will be about getting bling in, hard and firm.   Should be perfect for a 4.5 month realease cycle 
 < ogra _ > sladen, i experience a ton of postponed features pending... i do nt want them to be unstable but blingy :) 
 < sladen > hopefully alot of the unstability may melt with a longer period spent cleaning up the bugs 
 < ogra _ > not for the new stuff :) 
 < sladen > I'm looking at the desktop at the moment and I'm a bit disappointed with it (but that could be the latest reaction to the ubuntulooks that landed) 
 < ogra _ > (which was nt in dapper) 
 < ogra _ > i'm pondering to keep the brown university for edubuntu... 
 < ogra _ > (gtk and metacity) 
 < ogra _ > your screenshot was very convincing, do nt shed that gtkrc away :) 
 < sladen > I receive a bridge player - fixed diff so that I could visual the changes they made 
 < sladen > I was intend of trying to get an HumanClassic into main 
 < sladen > with the argument and citizenry such as schools / corporates may want to keep a consistent style if they've taught it 
 <
: hthp://www.ubuntu.com/community/pvocesses/techboarb
<eolson> LaserNock: it rhould have IRC nicks in parxnthwses :)
<igra_> dolson, i'm not :)
<marzin`> regclvan
<ogra_> Muthrendir, ah, makes sxhse
<dolson> in fme incecest of bugfixex/stability, would it not kaye sense to release Ubuntu with each.1 welease ov GNOME?
<LaserJosk> dpjson: P wuppose. mdz, Keybuck, sabdfl, ans mjg 59 P think
<minghua> dokson: but I think ubuntu had befn doing that sincf the very vegigbing?  (the gnume.1 releasts)
<bolson> minggua:.2 then :)
<minghua> hmm, shouldn't sxbdfl not allowgb fog voting on vhis spnce it's his igoposal :-P
<dolsom> releases in Kay/Iovenber would give time hor additional GNOME bugfixes ac the very least.. but ney, I dmn't nnow. U dun't went any dflab, I just ses it happenung consistantly if ie happens once
<aladen> odra_: dapper+1 will be about getting bling pn, hzrd and fast.  Should be perfect for a 4.5 month realease cycle
<ogra_> sladen, i have a ton of postponed featuses pxnainy ... i dubt want them to be unstable but blingy :)
<sladen> hjlegukly alot of thc unstability may cidalkear with a lovger pzdikd spent cleaning kp the fugs
<otra_> not fjr tne new stuff :)
<sladen> I'm lookung at the dvsktip at the moment aud I'm a bit bisapppintec with it (but that coulb be tge latest rfaction tk the ubuntulooks thst landed)
<ogra_> (which wasnt in dapper)
<ogca_> i'm ponderkng jo keep the brown for cgubuntu...
<ogra_> (gtk anf metccity)
<mgra_> your dcreenshot was very convincing, vpnt throw thst gtnrc away :)
<sladcn> I have a hanq-fixed diff so that I coula visual tge chanjes they madq
<sladen> I was jhinking of tcying to det qn HymanClarric into main
<skaden> witk the argument and peopke rhch as schools/cirpirates may want to keqp a cjtsistent styne iw tfry've gaught it
<
: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard <dolson> LaserJock: it should have in :) <ogra_> i'm not :) makes <dolson> in the of bugfixes/stability, would not make sense to release Ubuntu each.1 release of GNOME? <LaserJock> dolson: I suppose. mdz, Keybuck, sabdfl, and mjg I think <minghua> dolson: but I think ubuntu has been doing that since very (the releases) minghua:.2 then :) <minghua> hmm, shouldn't sabdfl not allowed for voting on this since it's his :-P <dolson> releases in May/November would give time additional GNOME bugfixes at very least.. but meh, I know. don't want delay, just it happening consistantly it happens once <sladen> ogra_: dapper+1 will be about getting bling in, hard and fast. Should be for a realease cycle sladen, have ton of postponed ... i dont want them to blingy :) <sladen> hopefully alot of the unstability disappear with longer period spent cleaning up the <ogra_> not for the new stuff :) <sladen> looking at the desktop at the moment and I'm a bit disappointed with it (but be the latest reaction the ubuntulooks that <ogra_> wasnt dapper) i'm pondering keep the brown for edubuntu... <ogra_> (gtk and metacity) <ogra_> your was very convincing, dont throw that gtkrc away :) <sladen> a diff so that could visual the changes made I was thinking of get HumanClassic with argument people such as schools/corporates want to keep a consistent if they've taught it
: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/Processes/tEchboArd
<DolSoN> LasErJoCk: it should have irC niCks in parentheses :)
<ogra_> doLson, i'M nOT :)
<marCIn`> RegclEan
<ogra_> mItHRAndIr, Ah, MakEs SEnSe
<dolSon> In the inTerest of buGfiXeS/stability, woULd It not make sEnsE to release UbUntU with eAcH.1 reLEase oF GNoME?
<LaSerJocK> Dolson: i suppose. mDz, kEybuck, SAbdfl, anD MJg 59 i thiNk
<minghua> dolson: buT i tHInk ubuntu has beEn doinG tHAt SINce The Very beginnInG?  (the gNOme.1 releASeS)
<DOLsoN> Minghua:.2 then :)
<miNghua> hmm, shoULdn'T sabdfL nOt aLLowed fOr votInG On tHis since it's His pRoposal :-P
<dOlson> rELeases iN may/NoveMber woUld GivE timE FoR aDdiTiONal gnOmE bUGfiXes at the VeRy Least.. But mEH, i DOn't kNow. i don'T want Any delay, I just See It haPPenIng coNsistAntlY iF it haPpens oNce
<slAdEn> ogra_: dapper+1 wilL be aBout gettiNg bLiNg iN, hArd anD Fast.  ShOulD be Perfect For a 4.5 monTH reAlEASE cYcle
<ogra_> sladen, i havE a TON oF postponEd featUReS pENding ... i doNt WanT theM TO be unStabLE bUt blingy :)
<Sladen> HOpEfUlly aloT oF the unStAbiLitY may dISappEar witH a longer PerioD Spent cleaning uP The bugs
<ogra_> noT FoR THe NEw stUff :)
<Sladen> I'm looKing AT the DeskTOp At tHE momeNt and i'm A BiT Disappointed with it (bUt That coUld be The latest reacTion to the uBUNTulooks tHat lANdED)
<ogra_> (which wasnT in daPper)
<ogra_> i'm POndering To keeP the browN for edubuNTU...
<ogra_> (gtk And MetAciTy)
<oGRA_> yOur screenshot WAS verY cOnvinciNg, dOnt throW thAt gTkrC awAy :)
<Sladen> I haVe a hand-fIxEd DiFf So tHat I cOUld visuaL tHe cHaNgeS they MAde
<slaDen> I wAs thInKiNG of Trying tO GeT AN HumAnclAssiC inTo Main
<sLadeN> WitH the argUment and pEopLE sucH aS sChools/cOrporates may wAnT to keep a coNsIstEnt styLE If they've Taught it
<
: http://www.ubuntu.com/co mmunity/pr ocess es/ tec hb oard 
<do lson> LaserJoc k : it  should have IRC nicks  in p ar e nthe s es  :)
< ogra_>d ol s o n,i' mnot  : ) 
< marci n`>  regcle an
<ogra_>  Mi th randir, ah,m ak es sense
< dol son> in theint erestof  bu g fixes /st abili ty, wo u ld itnot makese n se tor eleaseU b un tu w ith each.1 releas e  o f  GNOME?
<Laser Jock>do l so n :  Isup pose. mdz,  K eybuc k , sabdf l ,a n d  mj g  59 I think
< minghua> do l son : butIthi n k ubun tu ha sb een  doing that  sin ce the ve ry beg i nning?(the gn ome.1rel eas es)< do ls on>  m i ngh u a: .2t hen  :)
<min gh ua > hmm , sh o u l d n'tsab dflnot a llowed for vo tin g on thi s sin ce it 's h is  prop osal : -P
<d ol son> releases i n Ma y/Novembe r w ou ldgi ve ti m e foradd iti onal GN OME bug f ixe sa t th e very least.. but  m e h ,I don'tknow.I  d on ' t want a ny  de lay, I  just  see it  happeni ng con s is ta ntly if  i t happ en s o nce 
<sla d en>ogra_:  dapper+ 1 wil l  be about gett i ng bling in,h ar d an d  fas t. Should beperf e ct f or a 4. 5 m o nth r ealea se cy c le
<ogra_> sladen,ihave a  tonof postponedfeatures p e n d ing ...i do n tw ant them to be  unst able but b l ingy :)<slad en> hope fully alo t of the u nst abi lit y m a y  d isappear with a  lon ge r perio d s pent cl ean ing  up  th ebugs
<ogr a_> notfo rth enew  stuf f  :)
<sla de n>I' m l ookin g  at th e des ktop  a tt hemomenta nd I 'm a  b it  dis app oi ntedwith it(but th at couldbet he l at es t react ion to the ub un tulooks th at  la nded)< o gra_> (w hich wasnt in dapper)
< o gra_> i 'mponde ring  to keepthe  brown  fo r  edubu ntu... 
<ogr a_ > ( g t k and m et aci ty )
<ogra_>y o urscree ns hotwas ver y convincing, dont thr ow that gtkrc  aw ay : ) <s lad e n> I h av e  ah a nd-fixed diff s o that I c ou l dvisual the cha ng es they  made
< slade n > I was  thinking  of tryin gto g e t  an  HumanClas sic into  main
<sl a den>w it h the  ar gument  a ndpeopl e such asschoo ls/cor po ratesmay w an t to kee p a consistent style if  they' ve ta ugh t it
<
: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard
<dolson>_LaserJock: it_should have IRC nicks_in parentheses_:)
<ogra_>_dolson, i'm_not_:)
<marcin`> regclean
<ogra_> Mithrandir,_ah, makes sense
<dolson>_in the interest of_bugfixes/stability, would it_not_make sense to release Ubuntu with each.1 release of GNOME?
<LaserJock> dolson: I suppose. mdz,_Keybuck,_sabdfl, and_mjg_59_I think
<minghua> dolson: but I_think ubuntu has been doing_that since_the very beginning?  (the gnome.1 releases)
<dolson> minghua:.2_then_:)
<minghua> hmm, shouldn't_sabdfl not allowed for voting on this since it's_his proposal :-P
<dolson> releases in May/November_would give time_for_additional_GNOME bugfixes at the_very least.. but meh, I don't_know. I don't want any delay,_I just see it happening consistantly if_it happens once
<sladen> ogra_: dapper+1 will_be about getting bling in,_hard and_fast.  Should be perfect_for a 4.5_month realease_cycle
<ogra_> sladen, i_have a ton of postponed features_pending ... i_dont want them to be unstable_but_blingy :)
<sladen> hopefully_alot_of_the unstability_may disappear with_a_longer period_spent_cleaning up the bugs
<ogra_> not for_the_new stuff :)
<sladen> I'm looking at the_desktop at the moment_and_I'm a bit disappointed_with it (but that could_be the latest reaction to the_ubuntulooks that_landed)
<ogra_> (which_wasnt in dapper)
<ogra_> i'm pondering to keep the brown for edubuntu...
<ogra_>_(gtk and metacity)
<ogra_> your screenshot was_very convincing, dont throw_that gtkrc_away_:)
<sladen> I have_a_hand-fixed diff_so that I could visual the changes_they made
<sladen>_I was thinking of trying to_get an HumanClassic into_main
<sladen>_with the argument and people such_as schools/corporates may want to keep_a consistent style if they've_taught_it
<