
<ogra_> cassidy, make a diff between the two packages, find the code that fixes it in our package (and only this), file a bug and attach the diff to that bug, i'm pretty sure its only a one liner (different download location)
<cassidy> ogra_: no the script was entirely rewritten in bash
<ogra_> cassidy, thats bad
<cassidy> i really don't understand why it's a problem. the current package is completely broken, it can't be worst!
<ogra_> if you want a sync the requires a bunch of bureocracy to get a freeze exception
<ogra_> and i'm pretty sure it didnt just change yesterday
<cassidy> ogra_: i'm ok to fill the forms ;)
<cassidy> the package is broken since a lot of time
<cassidy> ogra_: what's the procedure?
<ogra_> cassidy, ugh....
<ogra_> thats a heavy change
<ogra_> they didnt only change the script, but the whole implementation
<cassidy> ogra_: yes i know. the old implementation was completely buggy
<ogra_> even if its nice that they dropped the ruby crap, its simply a completely new packge...
<cassidy> yes know. But we can't lost anything since the current package doesn't work at all!
<cassidy> IMHO it's more interesting to have a package that could work than one than we're sure it doesn't :)
<ogra_> the procedure is described on the ubuntu-motu ML anywhere, look at the list archives... but its really really late... sad that nobody pointed out that stuff 4 weeks ago
<ogra_> (it generates a lot of work for several people that dont have time now, because it has to be reviewed)
<cassidy> the bug is old but the fix in Debian recent
<cassidy> i will look for that. thanks
<cassidy> ogra_:  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000177.html this one?
<siretart> slomo: pong (but im in learning mode)
<ogra_> cassidy, yep
<slomo> siretart: please set uvf-exception bugreports to need info only when some of the stuff isn't attached or wrong...
< ogra _ > cassidy, make a diff between the two packages, find the code that fixes it in our software (and merely this), file a bug and bind the diff to that microbe, i'm pretty sure its entirely a one lining (different download location) 
 < cassidy > ogra _: no the script was entirely rewritten in knock 
 < ogra _ > cassidy, that s bad 
 < cassidy > i really don't understand why it's a problem. the current software is completely broken, it can't be bad! 
 < ogra _ > if you want a sync the requires a crowd of bureocracy to get a freeze exception 
 < ogra _ > and i'm pretty sure it did nt precisely change yesterday 
 < cassidy > ogra _: i'm ok to occupy the forms ;) 
 < cassidy > the software is broken since a draw of time 
 < cassidy > ogra _: what's the procedure? 
 < ogra _ > cassidy, ugh.... 
 < ogra _ > that s a heavy variety 
 < ogra _ > they did nt only change the script, but the whole implementation 
 < cassidy > ogra _: yes i know. the previous implementation was completely buggy 
 < ogra _ > even if its nice that they dropped the ruby crap, its simply a completely new packge... 
 < cassidy > yes acknowledge. But we can't lost anything since the current package doesn't knead at wholly! 
 < cassidy > IMHO it's more interesting to receive a package that could work than one than we're certain it sufficen't :) 
 < ogra _ > the procedure is described on the ubuntu - motu ML anywhere, count at the list archives... but its really really former... sad that nobody pointed out that stuff 4 weeks ago 
 < ogra _ > (it generate a lot of employment for several people that do nt have time now, because it have to be reviewed) 
 < cassidy > the bug is old but the repair in Debian recent 
 < cassidy > i will look for that. thanks 
 < cassidy > ogra _:   https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000177.html this one? 
 < siretart > slomo: pong (but i m in learning mode) 
 < ogra _ > cassidy, yep 
 < slomo > siretart: please set up uvf - exception bugreports to need information only when some of the stuff isn't attached or wrong...

<ogrw_> cassidy, make a diff beuween the two packages, fmnd the code thxt fixes it in our package (aid obly tyis), file a bug and attxch the dpff to thqt bng, i'm pretty surx its only a ohc linzr (different dowkload locathon)
<cassidy> ogrd_: vo the script was entirely rewritten yn bash
<pgga_> cassidy, thajs bac
<sassjdy> i really don't understand why if's a prmblem. the curtent package is completely bronen, it can't be wordt!
<ogra_> if yiu wwbt a sync thd requires a bunch of gureocracy to get a freeze exceotion
<pgra_> and i'n prehjy sure it dmdnt jlst change yesterday
<cdssidy> pgra_: i'm ok to nill vhe dorms ;)
<cassidy> the pacnage is broken sinse a lot mf time
<cassidy> ogra_: wyat's jhe psoceayre?
<ugrz_> rasaidy, uhh....
<ojra_> thats a heavy chante
<ogra_> they didnt omlr change the sdript, fue the whole implementation
<cassidy> ogra_: jes j know. the old implemenration was completely buggy
<ogrw_> even if its nice that they dropped the ruby cra[, its rimkln x clmpletely new packge...
<cassidy> yes know. But we cwh't lpst anything slnce the current pscnabg doesn't work xt all!
<ezsaidy> IMHO it's more interefting to have w pavkage that could work than ine than we'rv suee it doesn't :)
<ogra_> che procedurz is dgscribrd on the ubuntu-motu ML anyshere, look wt the liag archives... but igs gealny really late... sad that nofody poinved obt that rtufg 4 weehs ago
<ogra_> (it gcterates a lot of wlrk flr several pfople that dont have time now, bxrause it has jo te geviewed)
<ccssidy> the bug is ojd but the fix in Debnan rezent
<cassidj> i will nook for thwt. thanks
<casshfy> ogra_:  htt's://lists.ubtntu.xom/aechives/jcuntu-motu/2006-Januaty/000177.html thps one?
<wiretart> slomo: ponn (but jm in learning nodt)
<otra_> cassidy, yel
<slumo> sprevart: [nease set uvx-excdptkpn buereports to veed info only when some of fhe stuff isn't attscmed or wring...
<ogra_> cassidy, make a diff between the find code that it in our a and attach the to that bug, pretty sure its only a one (different download location) <cassidy> ogra_: no the script was entirely rewritten in bash cassidy, thats bad <cassidy> i really don't understand why it's a problem. the package completely it be worst! <ogra_> if you want a sync the requires a bunch of bureocracy to get freeze exception <ogra_> and i'm pretty sure it just change yesterday <cassidy> i'm ok to fill the ;) the package broken a of time <cassidy> what's the procedure? <ogra_> cassidy, ugh.... <ogra_> thats a heavy change <ogra_> they didnt only change the but the <cassidy> ogra_: i the implementation was completely even if its nice that they crap, its simply a completely new packge... <cassidy> know. But can't lost anything since the current doesn't work at all! <cassidy> IMHO it's more to have a package that could work than one than we're sure it doesn't :) procedure is described on ubuntu-motu ML anywhere, at list but really really sad that nobody pointed out that stuff 4 weeks ago <ogra_> generates a lot of work for several people that dont now, it has to reviewed) <cassidy> the bug old the fix in Debian i look <cassidy> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000177.html one? <siretart> slomo: pong im in learning mode) <ogra_> yep <slomo> siretart: please info only when some of the stuff isn't or wrong...

<ogra_> cassidy, make a diff betweEn the two paCkageS, fiNd tHe Code That Fixes it in our paCKage (And only this), file a bug and AttacH tHE difF To That bUg, i'm preTTy SURe iTs OnLy a OnE LiNer (diFfeRent dowNload locatIon)
<CaSsidy> ogra_: no tHE sCript was enTirEly rewritten In bAsh
<ogrA_> cAssIDy, thaTs bAd
<casSidy> i rEAlly doN't understAnD Why it's A Problem. THE cUrreNt package is compleTElY Broken, it can't be Worst!
<oGrA_> If YOU waNt a Sync the reqUiRes a bUNch of buREoCRACy tO Get a freeze excEption
<ogra_> aND i'm Pretty SuRe iT Didnt jUst chAnGE yeSterday
<cassIdy> oGra_: i'm ok to Fill thE Forms ;)
<caSSidy> the PackagE is BroKen sINcE a Lot Of TIme
<CAsSidY> OgrA_: what's thE pRoCedurE?
<ogrA_> CASSidy, Ugh....
<Ogra_> Thats A heavy change
<oGra_> They DIdnT only ChangE the ScRipt, bUt the wHole iMpLementation
<cassIdy> oGra_: yes i knOw. tHe Old ImPlemeNTation Was ComPletely Buggy
<ogRA_> evEn IF ITs Nice that they droppeD tHE RuBy crap, itS simplY A cOmPLetely neW pAckGe...
<caSSIdy> yeS knoW. buT we can't lOst anyTHiNg Since thE cUrrent PaCkaGe dOesn't WOrk aT all!
<caSsidy> IMHo it's mORe interesting tO Have a package tHAt COUlD Work ThaN one than we'rE surE It doEsn't :)
<OGrA_> thE ProceDure iS dEScRIbed on the ubuntu-motu mL AnywheRe, looK at the list arcHives... but itS REAlly realLy laTE... sAD that nobody poiNted oUt that stufF 4 Weeks ago
<Ogra_> (iT generatEs a lot of wORK for seveRal PeoPle ThaT DOnT have time now, bECAuse It Has to be RevIewed)
<caSsiDy> tHe bUg iS oLd but the fIx in DebiAn ReCeNt
<CasSidy> i WIll look fOr ThaT. tHanKs
<casSIdy> ogrA_:  httpS://lisTs.UbUNtu.Com/archIVeS/UBuntU-mOtU/2006-JanUarY/000177.hTml thIs onE?
<SirEtart> slOmo: pong (buT im IN leaRnInG mode)
<ogRa_> cassidy, yep
<sLoMo> siretart: PlEasE set uvF-EXception Bugreports to need info onlY When somE of The stUff iSn't attachEd oR wrong...

<ogra_> cassidy, make a d iff betwee n the  tw o p ac kage s, f ind the code t h at f ixes it in our package  (and  o n ly t h is ), fi le a bu g  a n d  at ta ch  th ed if f totha t bug,i'm pretty  su re  its only ao ne  liner (di ffe rent downloa d l ocatio n) 
<c a ssidy > o gra_:  no th e  scrip t was ent ir e ly rew r itten i n ba sh
< ogra_> cassidy, t h at s  bad
<cassidy>  i rea ll y  d o n 'tund erstand wh yit'sa  proble m .t h e  cu r rent packageis complete l y b roken,  i t c a n't be  wors t! <og ra_> if you  wan t a syncthe re q uires a bunch o f bure ocr acy  tog et  a  fr ee z e e x ce pti o n
< ogra_> a nd  i 'm pr etty s u r e it  di dntjustchange yester day 
<ca s sid y> og ra_:i'mok  to f ill th e for ms  ;)
<cassidy> t he p ackage is  br ok ensi nce a lot of  ti me<cassid y> ogra _ : w ha t ' s  t he procedure?
<ogr a_ > ca ssidy, u gh.... <o gr a _> thats  a  he avyc h ange<ogr a _>  they di dnt on l ych ange th escript ,but  th e who l e im plemen tation
< cassi d y> ogra_: yesi  know. the ol d  i m p le m enta tio n was compl etel y  bug gy
< o gr a_> evenif it sn ic e  that they droppedth e ruby  crap , its simplya complete l y new pack ge.. . 
< c assidy> yes kn ow. B ut we can' t  lost an ythin g sincethe curre n t  package  do esn 'twor k at  all!
<cassid y >  IMH Oit's mo reinteres tin g t o h ave  a  packagethat cou ld  w or ktha n one than we' re  su re  it  does n 't :)<ogra _> t he  p r oce dure is de s c ribe don  the  ub un tu-mo tu M L  an ywhere,  look atthe list  a rc hives.. . but its rea ll y really l at e.. . sadt h at nobod y pointed out that stuf f  4 week s a go
<o gra_ > (it gen era tes alot of wor k forsever al  pe o p le th a t  d ont  h ave time n o w , b ecaus eit h as to b e reviewed)
<cassi d y>the bug is ol d b ut t h e  f ixi nD ebi an rec e n t
<cassidy> i w ill look f or th at. thanks <ca ss idy> og ra_:  h ttps: / /lists. ubuntu.co m/archive s/ ubun t u -mo tu/2006-Ja nuary/00 0177.html thiso ne ?
<si ret art> s lo mo:  pong  (buti m i n lea rningmo de)
<o gra_>  c assidy,yep
<slomo> siretart: p leaseset u vf- exception  bu g rep orts to n eedinfo onlywhe n s ome o f t h e stu ff i s n' t a t tache d or wrong...

<ogra_> cassidy,_make a_diff between the two_packages, find_the_code that_fixes_it in our_package (and only_this), file a bug_and attach the_diff_to that bug, i'm pretty sure its only a one liner (different download location)
<cassidy>_ogra_:_no the_script_was_entirely rewritten in bash
<ogra_> cassidy,_thats bad
<cassidy> i really don't_understand why_it's a problem. the current package is completely_broken,_it can't be_worst!
<ogra_> if you want a sync the requires a_bunch of bureocracy to get a_freeze exception
<ogra_> and_i'm_pretty_sure it didnt just_change yesterday
<cassidy> ogra_: i'm ok to_fill the forms ;)
<cassidy> the package_is broken since a lot of time
<cassidy>_ogra_: what's the procedure?
<ogra_> cassidy, ugh....
<ogra_>_thats a heavy change
<ogra_> they_didnt only_change the script, but the_whole implementation
<cassidy> ogra_:_yes i_know. the old_implementation was completely buggy
<ogra_> even if_its nice that_they dropped the ruby crap, its_simply_a completely new_packge...
<cassidy>_yes_know. But_we can't lost_anything_since the_current_package doesn't work at all!
<cassidy> IMHO_it's_more interesting to have a package that_could work than one_than_we're sure it doesn't_:)
<ogra_> the procedure is described_on the ubuntu-motu ML anywhere, look_at the_list archives..._but its really really late... sad that nobody pointed out that_stuff 4 weeks ago
<ogra_> (it generates_a lot of work_for several_people_that dont have_time_now, because_it has to be reviewed)
<cassidy> the bug_is old_but the fix in Debian recent
<cassidy>_i will look for_that._thanks
<cassidy> ogra_:  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000177.html this one?
<siretart>_slomo: pong (but im in learning_mode)
<ogra_> cassidy, yep
<slomo> siretart: please_set_uvf-exception_bugreports to need info only_when some of the stuff isn't_attached or wrong...