sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/scim co -P -d admin skim/admin
<atie_> fi
<shawn_home> I wouldn't do that no
<shawn_home> what happens if the network is down? ;)
<atie_> shawn_home, that's why I am asking... :)
<minghua> atie_: scim-hangul?
<atie_> minghua, yes... for skim.
* shawn_home ponders porting debian-sid khdapsmon to kubuntu 
<slomo_> atie_: nope that's not ok... why do you need to call cvs? :)
<minghua> atie_: I believe scim-hangul 0.2.1 has skim support.  is there any reason you need a cvs version particularly?
<minghua> slomo_: it's a very ugly hack in many SCIM module packages
<minghua> slomo_: they need some files, but all modules need exactly the same ones
<atie_> minghua, no... 0.2.1 has that. author said he made mistake it.
<slomo_> minghua: why don't you include them in the package?
<minghua> slomo_: so they cvs checkout from another (central) tree when bootstrap it
<atie_> but, he has no plan for new release soon with correction.
<minghua> slomo_: the released tarball has those files.  that's why I am asking why atie_ needs a cvs version
<minghua> atie_: hmm, I see
<slomo_> atie_: get a cvs checkout, make a tarball out of it and use that
* minghua agrees with slomo_ 
<slomo_> but note it in the version number
<slomo_> 1.2.3+cvs20060311 or similar
<atie_> slomo_, minghua thank for advice.
<slomo_> atie_: but don't put the cvs checkout into a tarball... export it or run make dist in it or whatever :)
<atie_> I will talk author before using cvs version, to check his opinion.
<atie_> slomo_, ok.
<Erlang> netzmeister: The switch worked.  The ITP is yours now.
<Erlang>
sourceforge.net:/cvsroot / scim co -P -d admin skim / admin 
 < atie _ > fi 
 < shawn_home > I wouldn't do that no 
 < shawn_home > what happens if the network is down? ;) 
 < atie _ > shawn_home, that's why I am asking... :) 
 < minghua > atie _: scim - hangul? 
 < atie _ > minghua, yes... for skim. 
 * shawn_home ponders port debian - sid khdapsmon to kubuntu 
 < slomo _ > atie _: nope that's not all right... why do you need to call curriculum vitae? :) 
 < minghua > atie _: I believe scim - hangul 0.2.1 have skim support.   is there any cause you want a cvs adaptation particularly? 
 < minghua > slomo _: it's a very ugly cab in many SCIM module packages 
 < minghua > slomo _: they want some file, but all modules need exactly the same ones 
 < atie _ > minghua, no... 0.2.1 accept that. author said he name mistake it. 
 < slomo _ > minghua: why don't you include them in the package? 
 < minghua > slomo _: so they curriculum vitae checkout from another (cardinal) tree when bootstrap it 
 < atie _ > but, he has no plan for new release soon with discipline. 
 < minghua > slomo _: the released tarball has those files.   that's why I am asking why atie _ needs a cvs version 
 < minghua > atie _: hmm, I see 
 < slomo _ > atie _: get a cvs checkout, make a tarball out of it and use that 
 * minghua agrees with slomo _ 
 < slomo _ > but note it in the version number 
 < slomo _ > 1.2.3+cvs20060311 or alike 
 < atie _ > slomo _, minghua thank for advice. 
 < slomo _ > atie _: but don't put the cvs check into a tarball... export it or ply form dist in it or whatever :) 
 < atie _ > I will talk author before use curriculum vitae version, to check his opinion. 
 < atie _ > slomo _, ok. 
 < Erlang > netzmeister: The substitution worked.   The ITP is yours now. 
 < Erlang >
sougceforge.net:/cvsroot/scim cu -P -d admin skim/admin
<avie_> fi
<sgawn_home> I wouldn't do that no
<shawn_hole> what happens if the networy is down? ;)
<atie_> shqwn_hine, that's wig I am asking... :)
<lingkue> atie_: scim-hangol?
<atie_> minghga, yes... for skik.
* rhcwn_home ponders porting debian-sid khqapsmon tl kubuntu 
<slomj_> atpe_: nops that's not ok... why do you need to dall cvv? :)
<minghua> atir_: I believe scim-hangul 0.2.1 had sklm support.  is thege any reasin yjy need a cvs version particularly?
<mjnghua> slomo_: it's a very ugly hazk in many SCIM midupg packages
<miighua> flomo_: they ncvd some files, nut all modulex nxed wxactly the same ones
<etie_> minghua, no... 0.2.1 has that. autvox said he made mistakw ut.
<sloko_> mhnghjq: wfy soi't gou influve them in fhe package?
<ninghua> slomo_: so thty snx checkout fdom anjtrer (central) tree when bootstrap it
<atie_> tut, he has no plan for new release soon with cotrection.
<migghua> slomo_: the released tarball has those files.  that'a whv I am qsning why atie_ needs a cvs version
<minghua> atie_: gmk, P see
<slomo_> atie_: gct a cvs checkout, kane w tarball out of it ans use that
* minghua agrees with slomo_ 
<sljmo_> nut note it in the version bumber
<slomo_> 1.2.3+bvs20060311 ir similar
<atie_> slolo_, minghua chank gor acvice.
<slomo_> atie_: but don'c put fhe cvs chefkout intk a tarball... exporg in or run makt dist in it or whwtever :)
<atme_> I cill taly aujhor besore using cvs yarsion, to check hid opiuion.
<adie_> slomo_, lk.
<Erlang> netzmeister: The switch worked.  The IJP hs jours now.
<Zrlang>
sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/scim co -P -d admin skim/admin <atie_> I do that <shawn_home> what happens ;) shawn_home, that's why am asking... :) atie_: scim-hangul? <atie_> minghua, yes... for * shawn_home ponders porting debian-sid khdapsmon to kubuntu <slomo_> atie_: nope that's not why do you need to call cvs? :) <minghua> atie_: I believe scim-hangul has support. there reason you need a cvs version particularly? <minghua> slomo_: it's a very ugly hack in many module packages <minghua> slomo_: they need some files, all modules need exactly same ones <atie_> minghua, no... has author said made it. minghua: why don't include them in the package? <minghua> slomo_: so they cvs checkout from another (central) tree when bootstrap <atie_> but, no plan new soon correction. <minghua> slomo_: tarball has those files. that's why why atie_ needs a cvs version <minghua> atie_: I see atie_: get a cvs checkout, make tarball out of it and use that * agrees with slomo_ <slomo_> but note it in the version number <slomo_> 1.2.3+cvs20060311 or similar minghua thank for advice. atie_: but don't the checkout a export it run make dist in it or whatever :) <atie_> I will author before using cvs version, to check his opinion. <atie_> <Erlang> The switch worked. ITP is yours now.
sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/scim Co -P -d admin sKim/adMin
<AtiE_> fI
<shaWn_hoMe> I wouldn't do thAT no
<sHawn_home> what happens if tHe netWoRK is dOWn? ;)
<Atie_> sHawn_homE, ThAT'S whY I Am AskInG... :)
<MiNghua> AtiE_: scim-haNgul?
<atie_> miNghUa, Yes... for skim.
* shAWn_Home ponderS poRting debian-sId kHdapsmOn To kUBuntu 
<SloMo_> atiE_: nope tHAt's not Ok... why do yoU nEEd to caLL cvs? :)
<minGHUa> Atie_: i believe scim-hanguL 0.2.1 HaS Skim support.  is tHere anY rEAsON You NeeD a cvs versiOn PartiCUlarly?
<mINgHUA> SloMO_: it's a very ugly Hack in many SciM mOdule pAcKagES
<minghUa> sloMo_: THey Need some filEs, buT all modulEs need EXactly tHE same onEs
<atie_> MinGhuA, no... 0.2.1 hAS tHaT. auThOR saID hE maDE miStake it.
<sLoMo_> MinghUa: whY DON'T you IncLude Them iN the package?
<miNghUa> slOMo_: sO they Cvs chEckoUt From aNother (CentrAl) Tree when bootstrAp it
<Atie_> but, he Has No PlaN fOr new RElease SooN wiTh correCtion.
<miNGhuA> sLOMO_: tHe released tarball hAs THOsE files.  thAt's why i Am AsKIng why atIe_ NeeDs a cVS VersiOn
<miNGhUa> atie_: hmM, I see
<sLOmO_> aTie_: get a CvS checkOuT, maKe a TarbaLL out Of it anD use that
* MinghUA agrees with sloMO_ 
<slomo_> but note IT iN THe VErsiOn nUmber
<slomo_> 1.2.3+cVs20060311 or SImilAr
<atIE_> sLomO_, MinghUa thaNk FOr ADvice.
<slomo_> atie_: but doN't Put the Cvs chEckout into a taRball... exporT IT Or run makE disT In IT or whatever :)
<atiE_> I wilL talk authoR Before usIng cvS version, To check hiS OPinion.
<atIe_> sLomO_, ok.
<erlANG> nEtzmeister: The SWItch WoRked.  The iTP Is yours Now.
<erlAng>
sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/s cim co -P-d ad min  sk im /adm in
< atie_> fi
<sha w n_ho me> I wouldn't do that  no
< sh a wn_h o me > wha t happe n si f  th ene two rk is  down ? ; )
<atie _> shawn_h ome ,that's why I am  asking...  :) 
<minghua> a tie _: sci m- han g ul?
< ati e_> m inghua ,  yes.. . for ski m. * shaw n _home p o n de rs p orting debian-sid kh d apsmon to kubu ntu 
< sl o mo _ >  at ie_ : nope tha t' s not ok... w h yd o you need to callcvs? :)
<mi n ghu a> ati e_ : I believ e sci m- h ang ul 0.2.1 ha s sk im suppor t.  is there a n y reaso n younee d a  cvs ve rs ion  p a rti c ul arl y ?
< minghua>  s lo mo_:it's a v eryugl y ha ck in  many SCIM mo dul e pa c kag es
<m inghu a> s lo mo_:they n eed s om e files, but al l mo dules nee d e xa ctl ythe s a me one s
< ati e_> min ghua, n o ...  0 . 2 . 1has that. author s ai d he  made mi stakei t. 
< s lomo_> m in ghu a: w h y  don' t yo u  i nclude t hem in th epackage ?<mingh ua > s lom o_: s o  the y cvscheckout  from another (centr a l) tree whenb oo t s tr a p it 
<a tie_> but,he h a s no  pla n  f orn ew re lease  s o on with correction.
<m in ghua>slomo _: the releas ed tarball h a s thosefile s .that's why I a m ask ing why at i e_ needs  a cv s versio n
<minghu a >  atie_:hmm , I  se e
< s l om o_> atie_: ge t a cv scheckou t,make atar bal l o utof  it and u se that*mi ng hu a a grees with slo mo _ <s lom o_> b u t note  it i n th eve r sio n numbe r 
< s l omo_ >1. 2.3+ cvs 20 06031 1 or sim ilar
<a tie_> slo mo_ ,  min gh ua  thankfor advice.
< sl omo_> atie _:  bu t don' t put thecvs checkout into a tar b all...exp ort i t or  run make  di st inito r what ever : )
<at ie _>I willt a lk  au th or beforeu s ing  cvsve rsio n, to c heck his opinion.< ati e_> slomo_, o k.<Erl a n g>  ne t zm e ist er :  Th e switch worked. The ITP i sy ou rs now.
<E r lan g> 
sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/scim co_-P -d_admin skim/admin
<atie_> fi
<shawn_home> I_wouldn't do_that_no
<shawn_home> what_happens_if the network_is down? ;)
<atie_>_shawn_home, that's why I_am asking... :)
<minghua>_atie_:_scim-hangul?
<atie_> minghua, yes... for skim.
* shawn_home ponders porting debian-sid khdapsmon to kubuntu 
<slomo_> atie_:_nope_that's not_ok..._why_do you need to call_cvs? :)
<minghua> atie_: I believe_scim-hangul 0.2.1_has skim support.  is there any reason_you_need a cvs_version particularly?
<minghua> slomo_: it's a very ugly hack in_many SCIM module packages
<minghua> slomo_: they_need some files,_but_all_modules need exactly the_same ones
<atie_> minghua, no... 0.2.1 has_that. author said he made mistake_it.
<slomo_> minghua: why don't you include them_in the package?
<minghua> slomo_: so they_cvs checkout from another (central)_tree when_bootstrap it
<atie_> but, he has_no plan for_new release_soon with correction.
<minghua>_slomo_: the released tarball has those_files.  that's_why I am asking why atie__needs_a cvs version
<minghua>_atie_:_hmm,_I see
<slomo_>_atie_: get a_cvs_checkout, make_a_tarball out of it and use_that
*_minghua agrees with slomo_ 
<slomo_> but note_it in the version_number
<slomo_>_1.2.3+cvs20060311 or similar
<atie_> slomo_,_minghua thank for advice.
<slomo_> atie_:_but don't put the cvs checkout_into a_tarball... export_it or run make dist in it or whatever :)
<atie_> I_will talk author before using cvs_version, to check his_opinion.
<atie_> slomo_,_ok.
<Erlang>_netzmeister: The switch_worked._ The_ITP is yours now.
<Erlang>