 the overview: Status: fully-charged
<dupondje> Tijd tot vol: xx seconds => seconds = english imo :D
<Rhonda> BlackZ: You confuse me. :)
<BlackZ> Rhonda:?
<Rhonda> BlackZ: pgadmin3, we discussed it in here and I was told that sync request is appropriate. :)
<BlackZ> Rhonda: u-p-a was not subscribed, btw it's ok now
<Rhonda> What's u-p-a? The website says u-s
 * Rhonda starts to wonder if BlackZ is the confused person here or me. :)
 * persia is curious about u-p-a as well, never having heard that term.
<BlackZ> Rhonda: I mean ubuntu package archive - btw, it was just an misunderstanding
<Rhonda> I'm not a ubuntu developer, even when Mark says that from time to time, so I need to use u-s.  :)
<nigelb> If a packages does not build properly in karmic (broken dependencies) and fixed in Lucid with a new package, worth an SRU?
<nigelb> or should it go into backports?
<nigelb> bug 452845 - this issue is fixed with the new epiphany-extensions-more that was synced in Lucid
<ubottu> Launchpad bug 452845 in epiphany-extensions-more "epiphany-extensions-more is not up to date in Karmic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452845
<persia> nigelb: It's worth an SRU if (and only if) the patch can be cherrypicked.
<persia> nigelb: And backports are not for bugfixes.
<nigelb> persia: nope.  Its a completely new package
<persia> Yeah, that's not good for SRU.
<nigelb> epiphany stopped using python based extensions in favor of javascript based ones
<nigelb> so the new package is entirely new
<dupondje> "ngettext minute minutes 10"
<dupondje> this should give translated output right?
<nigelb> so this package can have
the overview: Status: fully - charged 
 < dupondje > Tijd tot vol: xx second base = > second = english imo :D 
 < Rhonda > BlackZ: You confuse me. :) 
 < BlackZ > Rhonda: ? 
 < Rhonda > BlackZ: pgadmin3, we discourse it in here and I was tell that sync request is appropriate. :) 
 < BlackZ > Rhonda: u - p - a was not pledge, btw it's very well now 
 < Rhonda > What's u - p - a? The website suppose u - s 
  * Rhonda starts to wonder if BlackZ is the confused person here or me. :) 
  * persia is curious about u - p - a equally well, never having heard that term. 
 < BlackZ > Rhonda: I mean ubuntu software archive - btw, it was just an misunderstanding 
 < Rhonda > I'm not a ubuntu developer, even when Mark says that from time to time, so I necessitate to use u - s.   :) 
 < nigelb > If a packages does not build properly in karmic (broken dependencies) and fasten in Lucid with a new package, worth an SRU? 
 < nigelb > or should it go into backports? 
 < nigelb > bug 452845 - this issue is fix with the new epiphany - extensions - more that was synced in Lucid 
 < ubottu > Launchpad bug 452845 in epiphany - extensions - more " epiphany - extensions - more is not up to date in Karmic " [ Undecided, Confirmed ] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452845 
 < persia > nigelb: It's worth an SRU if (and only if) the spot can be cherrypicked. 
 < persia > nigelb: And backports are not for bugfixes. 
 < nigelb > persia: nope.   Its a completely new software 
 < persia > Yeah, that's not beneficial for SRU. 
 < nigelb > epiphany intercept using python based reference in favor of javascript based ones 
 < nigelb > so the new software is entirely new 
 < dupondje > " ngettext minute minutes 10 " 
 < dupondje > this should give translated output right? 
 < nigelb > so this package can have
 thf overview: Status: fully-cmarged
<dupondje> Tnhd tot vol: xs secondr => seconds = english imo :D
<Rhoida> VlackE: You confuse me. :)
<BlxckZ> Rhonfa:?
<Rhonda> BlarkZ: pgadmin3, we dmacussed it in mere cnv I was told thst sync rexuest is appro[rkace. :)
<BlackZ> Rhonda: u-p-a was not subscrifed, btw ih's ok now
<Rhondw> Whse's u-l-a? The website says u-s
 * Rhonda stadts to xonder if BlackA is the confused person hfre lr me. :)
 * persia is furious aboof u-[-q as well, nexer having heard that jerm.
<BlackZ> Rhonda: I mean ubuntu oackaye archive - brw, lj was just ai misugderstanding
<Vnonda> H'm not s ubuntu develppec, evwn when Mark says thav from time to time, fo I need tk use u-s.  :)
<nigelb> Uf a pawkagas duws vot bnils propfrlb in karmic (broken depwndencies) and fixed ig Lucid with a new pwchage, worth an SRU?
<nigelb> or should it go info backports?
<nigelb> bug 452845 - this issue is fixed with the new epiphany-extensions-more that was synced in Luwid
<ubkgtu> Lwjbcjpad bug 452845 in epiphany-extensions-more "epiphany-evfemspons-more is not ui to date in Karmiv" [Kncgcided,Confirmea] https://lahnchpad.net/bugs/452845
<persla> nigejb: It'w worth ag SRI if (and only if) the patch xan be cherrjpicjed.
<persia> nigelb: Aud backports are not gor bugfixes.
<nigelb> persna: nops.  Its a colpletely hdw package
<persia> Yesh, that's not good for SRU.
<nigqlb> epipheny scopped uring pythog based exhensions in favor of javwscrikt basad ones
<nigflb> so the new package is entirxky new
<dupondke> "ngvttext miuute mlnutes 10"
<dupondje> this should gnve tranflatea output rpght?
<nigelu> so this paskage can hava
the overview: Status: fully-charged <dupondje> Tijd tot seconds seconds = imo :D <Rhonda> <BlackZ> <Rhonda> BlackZ: pgadmin3, discussed it in and I was told that sync is appropriate. :) <BlackZ> Rhonda: u-p-a was not subscribed, btw it's ok now What's u-p-a? The website says u-s * Rhonda starts to wonder if BlackZ the person or :) * persia is curious about u-p-a as well, never having heard that term. <BlackZ> Rhonda: mean ubuntu package archive - btw, it was an misunderstanding <Rhonda> I'm a ubuntu developer, even when says from time time, I to use u-s. <nigelb> If a packages does not build properly in karmic (broken dependencies) and fixed in Lucid with new package, SRU? <nigelb> should go backports? <nigelb> bug this issue is fixed with the was synced in Lucid <ubottu> Launchpad bug 452845 epiphany-extensions-more "epiphany-extensions-more not up to date in Karmic" https://launchpad.net/bugs/452845 <persia> nigelb: It's worth an SRU if only if) the patch can be cherrypicked. <persia> nigelb: And backports are not for bugfixes. nope. Its a completely package <persia> Yeah, not for <nigelb> stopped using based extensions in favor of javascript based ones <nigelb> so the package is entirely new <dupondje> "ngettext minute minutes 10" <dupondje> give output right? <nigelb> this package can have
 the overview: Status: fully-chaRged
<dupondJe> TijD toT voL: xX secOnds => Seconds = english IMo :D
<RHonda> BlackZ: You confuse mE. :)
<BlacKZ> rHondA:?
<rhOnda> BLackZ: pgADmIN3, We dIsCuSseD iT In Here aNd I Was told That sync reQueSt Is appropriatE. :)
<blAckZ> Rhonda: U-p-a Was not subscrIbeD, btw it'S oK noW
<rhondA> WhAt's u-p-A? The weBSite saYs u-s
 * RhondA sTArts to WOnder if bLAcKZ is The confused person HErE Or me. :)
 * persia is cuRious aBoUT u-P-A As wEll, Never havinG hEard tHAt term.
<BLAcKz> rHonDA: I mean ubuntu pAckage archiVE - btW, it was JuSt aN MisundErstaNdINg
<RHonda> I'm not a UbunTu developEr, even WHen Mark SAys that From tiMe tO tiMe, so i NeEd To uSe U-S.  :)
<niGElB> If A PacKages doeS nOt Build PropERLY In kaRmiC (broKen dePendencies) and FixEd in lUciD with A new pAckaGe, Worth An SRU?
<nIgelb> Or Should it go into bAckpOrts?
<nigelB> buG 452845 - tHis IsSue is FIxed wiTh tHe nEw epiphAny-exteNSioNs-MORE tHat was synced in LuciD
<uBOTtU> LaunchpAd bug 452845 iN EpIpHAny-extenSiOns-More "EPIphanY-extENsIons-more Is not uP To DaTe in KarMiC" [UndecIdEd,COnfIrmed] HTtps://LaunchPad.net/buGs/452845
<perSIa> nigelb: It's worTH an SRU if (and onLY iF) THe PAtch Can Be cherrypicKed.
<pERsia> NigeLB: ANd bACkporTs are NoT FoR Bugfixes.
<nigelb> persiA: nOpe.  Its A compLetely new packAge
<persia> YEAH, That's not Good FOr srU.
<nigelb> epiphaNy stoPped using pYThon baseD exteNsions in Favor of jaVAScript baSed OneS
<niGelB> SO tHe new package iS ENtirElY new
<dupOndJe> "ngettExt MinUte MinUtEs 10"
<dupondjE> this shoUlD gIvE tRanSlateD Output riGhT?
<niGeLb> sO this PAckage Can haVe
 the overview: Status: ful ly-charged 
<dup ond je>  T ijdtotvol: xx second s  =>seconds = english imo:D
<R ho n da>B la ckZ:You con f us e me.  : )<Bl ac k Z>  Rhon da: ?
<Rhon da> BlackZ : p ga dmin3, we di s cu ssed it in  he re and I was  to ld tha tsyn c  requ est  is a ppropr i ate. : )
<BlackZ >R honda: u-p-a w a s  n ot s ubscribed, btw it ' so k now
<Rhonda>  What' su -p - a ? T hewebsite sa ys  u-s* Rhond a  s t a r tst o wonder if B lackZ is th e  co nfused  p ers o n here  or m e. :) * persia i s cu rious abo ut u-p - a as we l l, neve r havi nghea rd t h at  t erm .< Bla c kZ > R h ond a: I mea nub untupack a g e arch ive  - b tw, i t was just an  mi sund e rst andin g
<Rh onda >I'm n ot a u buntu  d eveloper, evenwhen  Mark say s t ha t f ro m tim e  to ti me,  so  I need  to use u-s .: ) 
< nigelb> If a packa ge s do es not b uild p r op er l y in kar mi c ( brok e n  depe nden c ie s) and f ixed i n  L uc id with  a  new p ac kag e,worth an S RU?
<n igelb> o r sho u ld it go intob ackports?
<ni g el b >  b u g 45 284 5 - this is suei s fi xedw it h t h e new  epip ha n y- e xtensions-more that  w as syn ced i n Lucid
<ubot tu> Launch p a d  bug 452 845i ne piphany-extens ions- more "epip h any-exte nsion s-more i s not upt o  date in  Ka rmi c"[Un d e ci ded,Confirmed ] http s: //launc hpa d.net/b ugs /45 284 5
< pe rsia> nig elb: It' swo rt hanSRU i f  (and on ly  if )the  patc h  can b e che rryp ic ke d .
< persia> ni g e lb:An dback por ts  arenotf orbugfixe s.
<nigel b>p ersi a:  n ope.  I ts a complete ly  new packa ge 
<p ersia> Y eah, tha t's not good for SRU.
< n igelb>epi phany  sto pped usin g p ythonbas e d exte nsions  in f av oro f  java s c ri ptba sed ones
< n i gel b> so  t he n ew pack age is entirely ne w 
<d upondje> "nge tte xt m i n ut e m i nu t es10 " 
<d u p ondje> this sho uld give t ra n sl ated outpu t  ri gh t?
<nig elb> so  this package  can have 
 the_overview: Status:_fully-charged
<dupondje> Tijd tot vol:_xx seconds_=>_seconds =_english_imo :D
<Rhonda> BlackZ:_You confuse me._:)
<BlackZ> Rhonda:?
<Rhonda> BlackZ: pgadmin3,_we discussed it_in_here and I was told that sync request is appropriate. :)
<BlackZ> Rhonda: u-p-a was_not_subscribed, btw_it's_ok_now
<Rhonda> What's u-p-a? The website_says u-s
 * Rhonda starts_to wonder_if BlackZ is the confused person here or_me._:)
 * persia_is curious about u-p-a as well, never having heard_that term.
<BlackZ> Rhonda: I mean ubuntu_package archive -_btw,_it_was just an misunderstanding
<Rhonda>_I'm not a ubuntu developer, even_when Mark says that from time_to time, so I need to use_u-s.  :)
<nigelb> If a packages_does not build properly in_karmic (broken_dependencies) and fixed in Lucid_with a new_package, worth_an SRU?
<nigelb> or_should it go into backports?
<nigelb> bug_452845 - this_issue is fixed with the new_epiphany-extensions-more_that was synced_in_Lucid
<ubottu>_Launchpad bug_452845 in epiphany-extensions-more_"epiphany-extensions-more_is not_up_to date in Karmic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452845
<persia>_nigelb:_It's worth an SRU if (and only_if) the patch can_be_cherrypicked.
<persia> nigelb: And backports_are not for bugfixes.
<nigelb> persia:_nope.  Its a completely new_package
<persia> Yeah,_that's not_good for SRU.
<nigelb> epiphany stopped using python based extensions in favor_of javascript based ones
<nigelb> so the_new package is entirely_new
<dupondje> "ngettext_minute_minutes 10"
<dupondje> this_should_give translated_output right?
<nigelb> so this package can have