Gabert> however, just a regular user
<KasimirGabert> :)
<RainCT> KasimirGabert: can you try that and tell me what it says please?    python -c "import os; print os.uname()[4]"
<KasimirGabert> x86_64
<RainCT> KasimirGabert: and   python -c "import platform; print platform.machine()"   =
<KasimirGabert> the same
<RainCT> ok, thanks
<KasimirGabert> np
<blueyed> Any plans to add "grab-merge.sh" to ubuntu-dev-tools, so that it can get fixed?
<jdong> RainCT: platform.machine() is cross-platform
<RainCT> jdong: do you know how I can get just i386/amd64/powerpc/etc?
<jdong> RainCT: what was wrong with platform.machine()?
<jdong> that returns x86_64 right?
 * RainCT is trying to drop all dependencies on external stuff on pbuilder-dist (new python version), and dpkg-architecture is the only one remaining
<RainCT> jdong: yes
<hellboy195> RainCT: because of ldtp?
<jdong> well then just replace x86_64 with amd64
<jdong> RainCT: uname probably is bettter
<RainCT> jdong: is amd64 always (and only) = x86_64?
<jdong> RainCT: yes
<KasimirGabert> would somebody be able to help me with uploading to REVU? it does not seem to work
<jdong> RainCT: there's apparently an entire article dedicated to the trademarking/nomenclature but they are interchangeable terms
<RainCT> oh
<jdong> RainCT: uname -m is probably a better idea too
<RainCT> jdong: and for i386?
<KasimirGabert> uname -m returns x86_64 as well
<jdong> RainCT: you'll get i386, i586, or i686
<RainCT> allright then, thanks!
<jdong> sure :)
<ScottK2> blueyed: We can't add
Gabert > however, just a regular user 
 < KasimirGabert > :) 
 < RainCT > KasimirGabert: can you try that and assure me what it say please?     python -c " import os; print os.uname()[4 ] " 
 < KasimirGabert > x86_64 
 < RainCT > KasimirGabert: and    python -c " import chopine; print platform.machine () "    = 
 < KasimirGabert > the same 
 < RainCT > ok, thanks 
 < KasimirGabert > np 
 < blueyed > Any plans to lend " grab-merge.sh " to ubuntu - dev - tools, so that it can get fixed? 
 < jdong > RainCT: platform.machine () is crabbed - platform 
 < RainCT > jdong: do you acknowledge how I can get barely i386 / amd64 / powerpc / etc? 
 < jdong > RainCT: what was wrong with platform.machine ()? 
 < jdong > that returns x86_64 justly? 
  * RainCT is trying to drop all dependencies on external stuff on pbuilder - dist (new python adaptation), and dpkg - architecture is the only one remaining 
 < RainCT > jdong: yes 
 < hellboy195 > RainCT: because of ldtp? 
 < jdong > well then barely replace x86_64 with amd64 
 < jdong > RainCT: uname probably is bettter 
 < RainCT > jdong: is amd64 always (and merely) = x86_64? 
 < jdong > RainCT: yes 
 < KasimirGabert > would somebody be able to help me with uploading to REVU? it does not seem to work 
 < jdong > RainCT: there's apparently an entire article dedicate to the trademarking / nomenclature but they are interchangeable terms 
 < RainCT > oh 
 < jdong > RainCT: uname -m is probably a better idea too 
 < RainCT > jdong: and for i386? 
 < KasimirGabert > uname -m returns x86_64 as well 
 < jdong > RainCT: you'll get i386, i586, or i686 
 < RainCT > allright then, thanks! 
 < jdong > sure :) 
 < ScottK2 > blueyed: We can't add
Gabfrt> however, just a regulxr user
<KasimirGcvert> :)
<ReinCT> KzsimirGacert: can you try that and tepl me wyat it says please?    oython -c "pmport os; priit os.uname()[4]"
<KasimicFabert> w86_64
<XainCF> KasnmmrGabert: and   kython -c "impmrt platform; psivt platform.machine()"   =
<KasimirGabert> thq same
<RsijCT> ok, thanks
<KwsimprDabedn> kp
<blueyed> Any plans to add "grab-msrge.sh" uo ubuntu-dev-tools, xo that it can get fixed?
<jdlng> GainCT: platform.macjine() is crows-plwrform
<RainCT> gdong: do you know how J can get just i386/amd64/powerpc/etc?
<jdung> RcinCT: what qaw wgmng with pletform.iachine()?
<jdong> that redurns x86_64 right?
 * RainCT is trting to drop all depeidencies on external stuff on pyuilder-dist (new pythob cersimn), atd dojg-afchjtxcthre is thx only one demaining
<RaunCT> jdong: yes
<hellbpy195> GsinCT: becauss of lqt[?
<jdong> well then just replace x86_64 with amg64
<jdkng> RainCT: uname probaboy is bettter
<RainCT> jfong: is aid64 always (and only) = x86_64?
<jdong> RainCT: yes
<KasimirGaberd> wouma simcbodh bf able to help me with uploading to REVU? it djss npt seem to worh
<jdong> RainVT: tngre's apparentli an encjrs article dedicatef to thg tradwmarking/njmenvlature but they are intercyangeable tegms
<RqinCT> oh
<jdong> RainET: uname -m ir prpbablu a better idea too
<RainET> jdohg: and for l386?
<KasimirGzcert> uname -m retjrnx f86_64 as well
<jdong> RainCT: you'lj get i386, i586, or n686
<RainCT> xllroght tren, thanks!
<udong> sure :)
<ScottK2> blueyef: We ean't ddd
Gabert> however, just a regular user <KasimirGabert> KasimirGabert: you try and tell me -c os; print os.uname()[4]" x86_64 <RainCT> KasimirGabert: python -c "import platform; print platform.machine()" <KasimirGabert> the same <RainCT> ok, thanks <KasimirGabert> np <blueyed> Any plans to add to ubuntu-dev-tools, so that it can get fixed? <jdong> RainCT: platform.machine() is cross-platform jdong: you how can get just i386/amd64/powerpc/etc? <jdong> RainCT: what was wrong with platform.machine()? <jdong> that returns x86_64 right? RainCT is trying to drop all dependencies on stuff on pbuilder-dist (new version), and dpkg-architecture is the one <RainCT> jdong: <hellboy195> because ldtp? <jdong> well just replace x86_64 with amd64 <jdong> RainCT: uname probably is bettter <RainCT> jdong: is amd64 always (and = x86_64? yes <KasimirGabert> somebody able help me with REVU? it does not seem to there's apparently an entire article dedicated to the but they interchangeable terms <RainCT> oh <jdong> RainCT: -m is probably a better idea too <RainCT> and for i386? <KasimirGabert> uname -m returns x86_64 as well <jdong> RainCT: you'll get i386, i686 <RainCT> allright then, <jdong> sure :) blueyed: can't
Gabert> however, just a regular User
<KasimiRGabeRt> :)
<RAincT> kasiMirGAbert: can you try THat aNd tell me what it says pleaSe?    pytHoN -C "impORt Os; priNt os.unaME()[4]"
<KASImiRGAbErt> X86_64
<RAIncT> KasImiRGabert: And   python -c "ImpOrT platform; priNT pLatform.macHinE()"   =
<KasimirGabeRt> tHe same
<raInCt> Ok, thaNks
<kasimIrGabeRT> np
<bluEyed> Any plAnS To add "gRAb-merge.SH" To UbunTu-dev-tools, so that iT CaN Get fixed?
<jdong> RAinCT: pLaTFoRM.MacHinE() is cross-plAtForm
<RAInCT> jdoNG: dO YOU knOW how I can get juSt i386/amd64/powerPC/etC?
<jdong> raInCt: What waS wronG wITh pLatform.machIne()?
<jDong> that rEturns X86_64 Right?
 * RaINCT is trYing to DroP alL depENdEnCieS oN ExtERnAl sTUff On pbuildEr-DiSt (new PythON VERsioN), anD dpkG-archItecture is the OnlY one REmaIning
<rainCt> jdoNg: Yes
<heLlboy195> RAinCT: BeCause of ldtp?
<jdonG> welL then just RepLaCe x86_64 WiTh amd64
<JDong> RaInCt: unAme probAbly is bETttEr
<rAINCt> jdong: is amd64 always (aNd ONLy) = X86_64?
<jdong> RaInCT: yeS
<kaSiMIrGabert> WoUld SomeBODy be aBle tO HeLp me with UploadINg To rEVU? it dOeS not seEm To wOrk
<Jdong> rAinCt: there'S apparenTly an ENtire article deDIcated to the trADeMARkINg/noMenClature but tHey aRE intErchANgEabLE termS
<RaincT> OH
<jDOng> RainCT: uname -m is prObAbly a bEtter Idea too
<RainCT> Jdong: and foR I386?
<kAsimirGaBert> UNaME -m returns x86_64 as weLl
<jdoNg> RainCT: yoU'Ll get i386, i586, oR i686
<RaiNCT> allriGht then, thANKs!
<jdong> sUre :)
<scoTtK2> BluEYEd: we can't add
Gabert> however, just a re gular user 
<Kas imi rGa be rt>:)
< RainCT> Kasimi r Gabe rt: can you try that a nd te ll me w h at  it s ays ple a se ?   py th on-c "i mport  os ; print  os.uname( )[4 ]" 
<KasimirGab e rt > x86_64
< Rai nCT> Kasimir Gab ert: a nd   p ython  -c  "imp ort pl a tform;  print pl at f orm.ma c hine()"  = 
<Ka simirGabert> thes am e 
<RainCT> ok,thanks 
< K as i m irG abe rt> np
<bl ue yed>A ny plan s  t o a dd" grab-merge.sh " to ubuntu - dev -tools ,sot hat it  cange t  fi xed?
<jdong > Ra inCT: pla tform. m achine( )  is cro ss-pla tfo rm<Rai n CT >jdo ng :  do yo u k n owhow I ca nge t jus t i3 8 6 / a md64 /po werp c/etc ?
<jdong> Rai nCT : wh a t w as wr ong w ithpl atfor m.mach ine() ?<jdong> that re turn s x86_64rig ht ?
*RainC T  is tr yin g t o dropall dep e nde nc i e s  o n external stuff o np b ui lder-dis t (new py th o n versio n) , a nd d p k g-arc hite c tu re is th e only on eremaini ng 
<Rain CT > j don g: ye s 
<he llboy1 95> Rain CT: b e cause of ldtp? <jdong> wellt he n ju s t re pla ce x86_64 w itha md64 
<jd o ng > R a inCT:  unam ep ro b ably is bettter
<Ra in CT> jd ong:is amd64 alwa ys (and on l y )  = x86_6 4?
< j do n g> RainCT: yes 
<Kas imirGabert >  would s omebo dy be ab le to hel p me withupl oad ing  to R EV U? it does no t seem  t o work<jd ong> Ra inC T:the re' sapparentl y an ent ir ear ti cle  dedi c ated toth e t ra dem arkin g /nomen clatu re b ut  t h eyare int e rc h a ngea bl eterm s
< Ra inCT>  oh< jdo ng> Rai nCT: unam e - m  ispr ob ably abetter idea t oo 
<RainCT>jd ong : andf o r i386?<KasimirGabert> uname - m  return s x 86_64  aswell
<jdo ng>  RainC T:y ou'llget i3 86, i 58 6,o r  i686 < Ra inC T>  allrightt h en,  than ks !
<j dong> s ure :)
<ScottK2> b l uey ed: We can'tadd 
Gabert> however,_just a_regular user
<KasimirGabert> :)
<RainCT> KasimirGabert:_can you_try_that and_tell_me what it_says please? _  python -c_"import os; print_os.uname()[4]"
<KasimirGabert>_x86_64
<RainCT> KasimirGabert: and   python -c "import platform; print platform.machine()"   =
<KasimirGabert>_the_same
<RainCT> ok,_thanks
<KasimirGabert>_np
<blueyed>_Any plans to add "grab-merge.sh"_to ubuntu-dev-tools, so that it_can get_fixed?
<jdong> RainCT: platform.machine() is cross-platform
<RainCT> jdong: do you_know_how I can_get just i386/amd64/powerpc/etc?
<jdong> RainCT: what was wrong with platform.machine()?
<jdong>_that returns x86_64 right?
 * RainCT_is trying to_drop_all_dependencies on external stuff_on pbuilder-dist (new python version), and_dpkg-architecture is the only one remaining
<RainCT>_jdong: yes
<hellboy195> RainCT: because of ldtp?
<jdong> well_then just replace x86_64 with amd64
<jdong>_RainCT: uname probably is bettter
<RainCT>_jdong: is_amd64 always (and only) =_x86_64?
<jdong> RainCT: yes
<KasimirGabert>_would somebody_be able to_help me with uploading to REVU?_it does not_seem to work
<jdong> RainCT: there's apparently_an_entire article dedicated_to_the_trademarking/nomenclature but_they are interchangeable_terms
<RainCT>_oh
<jdong> RainCT:_uname_-m is probably a better idea_too
<RainCT>_jdong: and for i386?
<KasimirGabert> uname -m returns_x86_64 as well
<jdong> RainCT:_you'll_get i386, i586, or_i686
<RainCT> allright then, thanks!
<jdong> sure_:)
<ScottK2> blueyed: We can't add