 everything right
<tumbleweed> you sure you haven't disabled the manpage installation?
<tumbleweed> dpkg coa be told to skip directories
<tumbleweed> can
<Zhenech> is your fs not loving you today? or do you have something like "localepurge" installs
<erbo> tumbleweed: that might be it, where's is that controlled?
<tumbleweed> erbo: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/15/save-disk-space-by-excluding-useless-files-with-dpkg/
<erbo> Ah, that's it
<erbo> thanks a bunch, I thought I was going crazy
<vibhav> I have fixed around 68 typos in a program, how do I submit these to Ubuntu\Debian?
<sagaci> what program is it
<vibhav> adunn.app
<vibhav> http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/tags/spelling-error-in-binary.html
<tumbleweed> vibhav: send them upstream, not to Ubuntu/Debian
<tumbleweed> typos in documentation are worth fixing in Debian/Ubuntu, sometimes. But typos in code are not really
<vibhav> thanks tumbleweed
<vibhav> I cannot see any thingy for contribution
<vibhav> It just has a link to join the developer mailing list
<tumbleweed> if they don't have a bugtracker, mail th emaintainer
<vibhav> What if I dont get a reply?
<tumbleweed> unfortunately, you've then probably wasted your time
<tumbleweed> we do have things in the archives that have dead upstreams
<vibhav> Then can I submit them to Debian or upstream??
<tumbleweed> then we should consider whether the package should be in Debian
<shadeslayer> question, if I have a arch all package that fails to build on armel because some of the icons were not built, will it fail to buildd's as well? ( The arch all package will only be built on x86 right? )
<shadeslayer> The arch all package builds fine on x86
<tumbleweed> shadeslayer: correct re arch-all
everything right 
 < tumbleweed > you sure you haven't disabled the manpage installation? 
 < tumbleweed > dpkg coa be tell to hop directories 
 < tumbleweed > can 
 < Zhenech > is your fs not loving you today? or do you own something like " localepurge " installs 
 < erbo > tumbleweed: that might be it, where's is that controlled? 
 < tumbleweed > erbo: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/15/save-disk-space-by-excluding-useless-files-with-dpkg/ 
 < erbo > Ah, that's it 
 < erbo > thanks a bunch, I think I was function crazy 
 < vibhav > I have sterilize around 68 typos in a program, how do I put in these to Ubuntu\Debian? 
 < sagaci > what program is it 
 < vibhav > adunn.app 
 < vibhav > http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/tags/spelling-error-in-binary.html 
 < tumbleweed > vibhav: send them upstream, not to Ubuntu / Debian 
 < tumbleweed > misprint in documentation are worth fixing in Debian / Ubuntu, sometimes. But typos in code are not really 
 < vibhav > thanks tumbleweed 
 < vibhav > I cannot see any thingy for contribution 
 < vibhav > It just accept a link to join the developer mailing tilt 
 < tumbleweed > if they don't have a bugtracker, mail thursday emaintainer 
 < vibhav > What if I do nt get a answer? 
 < tumbleweed > unfortunately, you've then probably waste your time 
 < tumbleweed > we do have things in the archive that have dead upstreams 
 < vibhav > Then can I submit them to Debian or upstream? ? 
 < tumbleweed > then we should consider whether the package should be in Debian 
 < shadeslayer > question, if I accept a arch all package that fails to build on armel because some of the icons were not built, will it fail to buildd's as well? (The arch all package will only be built on x86 right ?) 
 < shadeslayer > The arch all software build up fine on x86 
 < tumbleweed > shadeslayer: right re arch - all
 evfrything right
<tumbleweed> you sure you hccen't dmsabled the manoage installation?
<tumbleweed> vpkg coa ve told to skip directuries
<tumbpeweed> cqn
<Zhtnech> is your fs ikt loviky you boday? ir do you have something like "localepusgd" nnstalls
<erbo> tumbleweed: that might bq it, whrrf's is that conjrolltd?
<ttmblsweed> erbo: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/15/sabe-disk-skace-by-excluding-usekess-files-with-dpkg/
<erbo> Ah, tjat's it
<erbo> thanks a bknch, I thoutht Y was going cfazy
<vibhav> I have fixes around 68 typos in a program, hod do N submit thgss hm Ubuntu\Debman?
<sagwci> what prongam is ht
<vibhaf> adunn.app
<vibhsv> ittp://ointian.ubuntuwire.org/tegs/spelling-error-in-bigary.html
<tgmyleweed> vibhav: send tyen upsjream, not ro Jbuhtn/Degian
<tulblxweed> typos in documenration are worth ficigt in Debian/Ubhntu, sjmqtimes. But typos in code are not really
<nibhzv> thanks tumbleweed
<vibyav> I cannot see any jhingy for contribution
<vibhav> It just has a link to join tha devxlupex mailkbg list
<tumbleweed> if they don't have a bugtrackew, msik th emaintaincr
<vibhav> What if I dlny get a reply?
<tomblewezs> hnfortunately, you'vf then krobaboy wasted yout time
<tumbleweed> we do have things in tke qrchives that have dead upstrzams
<vinhav> Yhen can I submit them co Debjan or upstgeam??
<tumblsdeed> then we shojld cmnsider whether the packagq should ue in Debian
<rhadgslayer> question, lf I mdve a arch all pacnage jhat fdils to bulld on armel because some of thx icons were mod blilt, will it fsil to buildd'f as well? ( The arch ajl pazkage will only bx built on x86 right? )
<shadesnwyer> The arci all pachage buiods find on x86
<tumbleweec> shadeslcver: corrext re arch-all
everything right <tumbleweed> you sure you haven't manpage <tumbleweed> dpkg be told to is fs not loving today? or do have something like "localepurge" installs <erbo> that might be it, where's is that controlled? <tumbleweed> erbo: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/15/save-disk-space-by-excluding-useless-files-with-dpkg/ <erbo> Ah, it <erbo> thanks a bunch, I thought I was going crazy <vibhav> I fixed 68 in program, how do I submit these to Ubuntu\Debian? <sagaci> what program is it <vibhav> adunn.app <vibhav> <tumbleweed> vibhav: send them upstream, not to Ubuntu/Debian typos in documentation are fixing in Debian/Ubuntu, sometimes. But in are not <vibhav> tumbleweed I cannot see thingy for contribution <vibhav> It just has a link to join the developer mailing list <tumbleweed> if don't have mail th <vibhav> if dont get a unfortunately, you've then probably wasted your do have things in the archives that have upstreams <vibhav> can I submit them to Debian upstream?? <tumbleweed> then we should consider whether the should be in Debian <shadeslayer> question, if I have a arch all package that fails on armel because some the icons were built, it to as well? The arch all package will only be built on x86 right? <shadeslayer> The arch all package builds fine on x86 <tumbleweed> re
 everything right
<tumbleweed> You sure you Haven'T diSabLeD the ManpAge installatioN?
<TumbLeweed> dpkg coa be told to sKip diReCToriES
<tUmbleWeed> can
<zHeNECh> iS yOuR fs NoT LoVing yOu tOday? or dO you have soMetHiNg like "localePUrGe" installs
<ErbO> tumbleweed: tHat Might bE iT, whERe's is ThaT contRolled?
<TUmblewEed> erbo: htTp://RAphaelHErtzog.cOM/2010/11/15/SaVe-diSk-space-by-excludinG-UsELess-files-with-dPkg/
<erbO> AH, ThAT'S it
<ErbO> thanks a buNcH, I thoUGht I was GOiNG CRazY
<Vibhav> I have fiXed around 68 tyPOs iN a progRaM, hoW Do I subMit thEsE To UBuntu\Debian?
<SagaCi> what proGram is IT
<vibhav> ADunn.app
<Vibhav> HttP://liNtiaN.UbUnTuwIrE.Org/TAgS/spELliNg-error-iN-bInAry.htMl
<tuMBLEWeed> VibHav: sEnd thEm upstream, not To UBuntU/debIan
<tuMblewEed> tYpOs in dOcumenTatioN aRe worth fixing in debiAn/Ubuntu, sOmeTiMes. buT typoS In code Are Not Really
<vIbhav> thANks TuMBLEwEed
<vibhav> I cannot seE aNY ThIngy for cOntribUTiOn
<VIbhav> It jUsT haS a liNK To joiN the DEvEloper maIling lISt
<TuMbleweeD> iF they dOn'T haVe a BugtrACker, Mail th EmaintaiNer
<viBHav> What if I dont GEt a reply?
<tumblEWeED> UnFOrtuNatEly, you've theN proBAbly WastED yOur TIme
<tuMblewEeD> We DO have things in the arcHiVes thaT have Dead upstreams
<Vibhav> Then CAN i submit tHem tO deBIan or upstream??
<tUmbleWeed> then we SHould conSider Whether tHe package SHOuld be in debIan
<ShaDesLAYeR> question, if I hAVE a arCh All packAge That faiLs tO buIld On aRmEl because Some of thE iCoNs WeRe nOt buiLT, will it fAiL to BuIldD's as wELl? ( The aRch alL pacKaGe WIll Only be bUIlT ON x86 riGhT? )
<sHadeSlaYeR> The aRch aLL paCkage buIlds fine oN x86
<tUMbleWeEd> ShadeslAyer: correct re ArCh-all
 everything right
<tumblew eed> you s ure y ouhav en 't d isab led the manpag e  ins tallation?
<tumbleweed > dpk gc oa b e  t old t o skipd ir e c tor ie s<tu mb l ew eed>can 
<Zhene ch> is you r f snot loving y o utoday? ordoyou have som eth ing li ke  "l o calep urg e" in stalls <erbo>  tumblewe ed :  thatm ight be i t,  whe re's is that cont r ol l ed?
<tumblewee d> erb o: ht t p :// rap haelhertzo g. com/2 0 10/11/1 5 /s a v e -di s k-space-by-ex cluding-use l ess -files -w ith - dpkg/<erbo >A h,that's it
< erbo > thanksa bunc h , I tho u ght I w as goi ngcra zy
< v ib ha v>Ih ave fi xed aro und 68 t yp os  in a  pro g r a m , ho w d o Isubmi t these to Ub unt u\De b ian ?
<sa gaci>  wha tprogr am isit
<v ib hav> adunn.app<vib hav> http :// li nti an .ubun t uwire. org /ta gs/spel ling-er r or- in - b i na ry.html
<tumblewee d> v ib hav: sen d them up st r eam, not  t o U bunt u / Debia n
<t u mb leweed>typosi ndo cumenta ti on are  w ort h f ixing in D ebian/ Ubuntu,somet i mes. But typos in code are n o tr e al l y
<v ibh av> thankstumb l ewee d
<v i bh av> I can not s ee an y  thingy for contrib ut ion
<v ibhav > It just has  a link to j o in the d evel o pe r  mailing list<tumb leweed> if they don 't ha ve a bug tracker,m a il th em ain tai ner 
<v i b ha v> What if Id o nt g et  a repl y?<tumble wee d>unf ort un ately, yo u've the npr ob ab lywaste d  your ti me 
<t um ble weed> we dohavethin gs  i n  th e archi v es t hatha ve  dea d u ps tream s
<v i bha v> Then  can I su bmi t  the mto  Debian  or upstream? ?<tumblewee d>  th en wes h ould con sider whether the packa g e shoul d b e inDebi an
<shade sla yer> q ues t ion, i f I ha ve aar cha l l pac k a ge  th at  fails tob u ild  on a rm el b ecausesome of the iconsw ere  not built, w ill  itf a il  to bu i ldd 's asw e ll? ( The archall packag ew il l only beb uil ton x86right?)
<sh a deslaye r> The ar ch all pa ck ageb u ild s fine onx86
<tum bleweed>s hades l ay er: c orr ect re  a rch -all
 everything_right
<tumbleweed> you_sure you haven't disabled_the manpage_installation?
<tumbleweed>_dpkg coa_be_told to skip_directories
<tumbleweed> can
<Zhenech> is_your fs not loving_you today? or_do_you have something like "localepurge" installs
<erbo> tumbleweed: that might be it, where's is that_controlled?
<tumbleweed>_erbo: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/15/save-disk-space-by-excluding-useless-files-with-dpkg/
<erbo>_Ah,_that's_it
<erbo> thanks a bunch, I_thought I was going crazy
<vibhav>_I have_fixed around 68 typos in a program, how_do_I submit these_to Ubuntu\Debian?
<sagaci> what program is it
<vibhav> adunn.app
<vibhav> http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/tags/spelling-error-in-binary.html
<tumbleweed> vibhav:_send them upstream, not to Ubuntu/Debian
<tumbleweed>_typos in documentation_are_worth_fixing in Debian/Ubuntu, sometimes._But typos in code are not_really
<vibhav> thanks tumbleweed
<vibhav> I cannot see_any thingy for contribution
<vibhav> It just has_a link to join the developer_mailing list
<tumbleweed> if they don't_have a_bugtracker, mail th emaintainer
<vibhav> What_if I dont_get a_reply?
<tumbleweed> unfortunately, you've_then probably wasted your time
<tumbleweed> we_do have things_in the archives that have dead_upstreams
<vibhav>_Then can I_submit_them_to Debian_or upstream??
<tumbleweed> then_we_should consider_whether_the package should be in Debian
<shadeslayer>_question,_if I have a arch all package_that fails to build_on_armel because some of_the icons were not built,_will it fail to buildd's as_well? (_The arch_all package will only be built on x86 right? )
<shadeslayer> The_arch all package builds fine on_x86
<tumbleweed> shadeslayer: correct re_arch-all