: sure
<mok0> ScottK, several important packages are in the list of rdepends, R for one; perhaps that is why the package is still in experimental
<mok0> ScottK, it's worse, you need to look at the rdepends of package libatlas3gf-base
<ScottK> Oh my.
<mok0> ScottK, I think libatlas-base-dev is the old version of libatlas
<mok0> ScottK, doesn't look realistic for Lucid, huh?
<ScottK> Yes, I was looking at current reverse-build-depends in Ubuntu, not Debian experimental.
<ScottK> mok0: For the ones that are run time depends (and not build depends), I suspect testing a sub-set of them would be sufficient if it goes well.
<ScottK> You might ask upstream about 3.6 -> 3.8 binary compatibility.
<mok0> ScottK, ok, I will investigate it
<siretart`> mok0: ScottK: is the backporters meeting scheduled for now or in 1h?
<mok0> siretart`: heh
 * ScottK looks at mok0.
<mok0> siretart`: It's actually 18:00 UTC now, but I think I made a mistake when scheduling the meeting
<siretart`> so, what do we do now?
<mok0> On the fridge, it says 19:00 UTC, so perhaps we should wait
<siretart`> TBH, that would suit me better, I could then have dinner right now :-)
<mok0> siretart`: great
<mok0> I will stick around #ubuntu-meeting in case anyone else shows up
<siretart`> excellent. thanks
<mok0> siretart`: enjoy you meal :-)
<siretart`> thanks :-)
<duanedesign> reviewing RC bugs Debian has closed I have found one that affects Lucid and it hasnt been merged.
<duanedesign> i am still learning the motu processes so I am unsure about what I should do next?
<geser> Have both Ubuntu and Debian the same upstream version?
<micahg> duanedesign: have you seen this: http
: sure 
 < mok0 > ScottK, several important packages are in the tilt of rdepends, radius for one; perhaps that is why the package is however in experimental 
 < mok0 > ScottK, it's bad, you need to look at the rdepends of software libatlas3gf - base 
 < ScottK > Oh my. 
 < mok0 > ScottK, I think libatlas - base - dev is the erstwhile version of libatlas 
 < mok0 > ScottK, doesn't look naturalistic for Lucid, huh? 
 < ScottK > Yes, I was looking at current reverse - build - depends in Ubuntu, not Debian experimental. 
 < ScottK > mok0: For the one that are run time depends (and not build depends), I distrust testing a sub - set of them would be sufficient if it go well. 
 < ScottK > You might ask upstream approximately 3.6 - > 3.8 binary compatibility. 
 < mok0 > ScottK, ok, I will investigate it 
 < siretart '> mok0: ScottK: is the backporters meeting scheduled for immediately or in 1h? 
 < mok0 > siretart `: heh 
  * ScottK looks at mok0. 
 < mok0 > siretart `: It's actually 18:00 UTC immediately, but I think I made a mistake when schedule the meeting 
 < siretart '> so, what do we do now? 
 < mok0 > On the fridge, it says 19:00 UTC, so perhaps we should wait 
 < siretart '> TBH, that would suit me better, I could then have dinner right now :-) 
 < mok0 > siretart `: great 
 < mok0 > I will stick around # ubuntu - meeting in case anyone else read up 
 < siretart '> excellent. thanks 
 < mok0 > siretart `: enjoy you meal :-) 
 < siretart '> thanks :-) 
 < duanedesign > reviewing RC bug Debian has close I have found one that affects Lucid and it has nt been unite. 
 < duanedesign > i am still learning the motu processes so I am unsure about what I should do next? 
 < geser > accept both Ubuntu and Debian the same upstream version? 
 < micahg > duanedesign: have you seen this: http
: suge
<mok0> ScottK, several impurtant packages are in the ljst of raepends, R for one; perhaps thet iw why the package is still kn experilental
<moj0> ScirtK, it's wocae, you kzed tk loon at the rdepencs of packdge libatlas3gf-tare
<DcottK> Oh my.
<mok0> ScottK, I think libaelas-basr-dfv is the old derspog of libatlas
<mok0> ScottK, doesn't look rezlistic for Lucid, hun?
<ScottK> Yes, I was looking wt ckrrent reverse-builf-depends in Ubugru, not Debiav experimental.
<ScottK> mkk0: For the ones that are run tioe de'ends (and nit bulnd depends), M suspvct testing a sub-set mf them would be sufflcienv if it goes well.
<ScottK> Ymu might ask upstrgam about 3.6 -> 3.8 binary compatibioiry.
<mok0> ScodtK, uj, I wiml ihvestihatx it
<siretarf`> mok0: ScottJ: is the backporterx ivrting schedumed fow gow or in 1h?
<mok0> siretart`: heh
 * ScottK loons zt mok0.
<mok0> siretart`: It's qctually 18:00 UTC now, but I think Y made a mistake when scheduling the meeting
<siretdrt`> sk, whcb ai ae do now?
<mok0> On the fridge, it says 19:00 UTC, so pewgaks ee should wait
<firetart`> TBN, hhsj would suit mg bettex, I could then have dlnner ryght bow :-)
<mok0> syretsrt`: great
<mok0> I will stick aeound #ubuntu-iweting in case anylne else shuws op
<sireyart`> excellent. thanks
<moy0> sidetart`: enjoj you meam :-)
<siretart`> thanks :-)
<dusnadesign> reviewing RC bugs Qebian haw clpsed I fave found one that wffecbv Lucid and it hasjt begn merced.
<duanededign> i am still learning the movn processes sp H ak unsure aboub what I should do next?
<geser> Kave botk Ubungu and Debpan the seme upstream version?
<micahc> duanedesign: have yot sewn tyis: htto
: sure <mok0> ScottK, several important packages the of rdepends, for one; perhaps is in experimental <mok0> it's worse, you to look at the rdepends of libatlas3gf-base <ScottK> Oh my. <mok0> ScottK, I think libatlas-base-dev is the old version libatlas <mok0> ScottK, doesn't look realistic for Lucid, huh? <ScottK> Yes, I was at reverse-build-depends Ubuntu, Debian experimental. <ScottK> mok0: For the ones that are run time depends (and not build depends), suspect testing a sub-set of them would be if it goes well. You might ask upstream about -> binary compatibility. ScottK, I investigate it <siretart`> ScottK: is the backporters meeting scheduled for now or in 1h? <mok0> siretart`: heh * ScottK looks mok0. <mok0> actually 18:00 now, I I made a scheduling the meeting <siretart`> so, what now? <mok0> On the fridge, it says 19:00 so perhaps should wait <siretart`> TBH, that would me better, I could then have dinner right :-) <mok0> siretart`: great <mok0> I will stick around #ubuntu-meeting in case anyone else shows excellent. thanks <mok0> siretart`: you meal :-) thanks <duanedesign> RC Debian has I have found one that affects Lucid and it hasnt been <duanedesign> i am still learning the motu processes so I about I should do <geser> Have both Ubuntu Debian same upstream version? <micahg> you this:
: sure
<mok0> ScottK, several imporTant packagEs are In tHe lIsT of rDepeNds, R for one; perhAPs thAt is why the package is stiLl in eXpERimeNTaL
<mok0> SCottK, it'S WoRSE, yoU nEeD to LoOK aT the rDepEnds of pAckage libaTlaS3gF-base
<ScottK> OH My.
<Mok0> ScottK, I ThiNk libatlas-baSe-dEv is thE oLd vERsion Of lIbatlAs
<mok0> SCOttK, doEsn't look rEaLIstic fOR Lucid, hUH?
<scOttK> yes, I was looking at cURrENt reverse-build-DependS iN ubUNTu, nOt DEbian experImEntal.
<sCottK> moK0: foR THE onES that are run tiMe depends (anD Not Build dEpEndS), i suspeCt tesTiNG a sUb-set of them WoulD be sufficIent if IT goes weLL.
<ScottK> you migHt aSk uPstrEAm AbOut 3.6 -> 3.8 BiNAry COmPatIBilIty.
<mok0> ScOtTK, Ok, I wiLl inVESTIgatE it
<SireTart`> mOk0: ScottK: is the BacKporTErs MeetiNg schEdulEd For noW or in 1h?
<Mok0> siReTart`: heh
 * ScottK loOks aT mok0.
<mok0> siRetArT`: It'S aCtualLY 18:00 UTC noW, buT I tHink I maDe a mistAKe wHeN SCHeDuling the meeting
<siReTARt`> So, what do We do noW?
<MoK0> ON The fridgE, iT saYs 19:00 UTc, SO perhAps wE ShOuld wait
<SiretaRT`> TbH, That wouLd Suit me BeTteR, I cOuld tHEn haVe dinnEr right nOw :-)
<mok0> SIretart`: great
<moK0> i will stick aroUNd #UBUnTU-meeTinG in case anyoNe elSE shoWs up
<SIrEtaRT`> exceLlent. ThANkS
<Mok0> siretart`: enjoy you MeAl :-)
<sireTart`> tHanks :-)
<duanedesIgn> reviewiNG rc bugs DebIan hAS cLOsed I have found One thAt affects LUCid and it Hasnt Been mergEd.
<duanedeSIGn> i am stiLl lEarNinG thE MOtU processes so I AM UnsuRe About whAt I Should dO neXt?
<gEseR> HaVe Both UbuntU and DebiAn ThE sAmE upStreaM Version?
<mIcAhg> DuAneDesigN: Have yoU seen This: HtTp
: sure
<mok0> ScottK, seve ral import ant p ack age sarein t he list of rde p ends , R for one; perhaps t hat i sw hy t h epacka ge is s t il l inex pe rim en t al 
<mok 0>ScottK,  it's wors e,yo u need to lo o kat the rde pen ds of packag e l ibatla s3 gf- b ase
< Sco ttK>Oh my. <mok0>  ScottK,It hink l i batlas- b a se -dev  is the old versi o no f libatlas
<mo k0> Sc ot t K, d oes n't  look real is tic f o r Lucid ,  h u h ? 
<S c ottK> Yes, Iwas looking atcurren trev e rse-bu ild-d ep e nds  in Ubuntu,  not  Debian e xperim e ntal.
< S cottK>mok0:For  th e on e sth atar e  ru n  t ime dep ends (an dno t bui ld d e p e n ds),  Isusp ect t esting a sub- set  oft hem  woul d besuff ic ientif itgoeswe ll.
<ScottK> Yo u mi ght ask u pst re amab out 3 . 6 -> 3 .8bin ary com patibil i ty. 
< m o k 0>  ScottK, ok, I wil li n ve stigateit
<si r et ar t `> mok0:  S cot tK:i s  theback p or ters mee ting s c he du led for  n ow orin  1h ?
< mok0> sire tart`:  heh
 *Scott K  looks at mok0 . 
<mok0> siret a rt ` :  I t 's a ctu ally 18:00UTCn ow,butI  t hin k  I ma de ami s ta k e when scheduling t he  meeti ng
<s iretart`> so,  what do w e d o now?
< mok0 >  O n  the fridge, i t say s 19:00 UT C , so per hapswe shoul d wait
<s i r etart`>TBH , t hat  wo u l dsuit me bette r ,  I c ou ld then  ha ve dinn errig htnow  : -)
<mok0>  siretar t` :gr ea t
< mok0> I will s ti ckar oun d #ub u ntu-me eting  inca se any one els e  s h o ws u p<s iret art `>  exce llen t . t hanks
< mok0> sir eta r t`:en jo y you m eal :-)
<sire ta rt`> thank s:-) 
<duan e d esign> r eviewing RC bugs Debian has clo sed  I ha ve f ound onetha t affe cts Lucidand it  hasn tbee n merge d . 
< dua ne design> ia m  st ill l ea rnin g the m otu processes so I amunsure aboutwha t Is h ou ldd on ext ?< ges e r > Have both Ubu ntu and De bi a nthe same u p str ea m versi on?
<mi cahg> duanede sign: hav e you see nthis : htt p
: sure
<mok0>_ScottK, several_important packages are in_the list_of_rdepends, R_for_one; perhaps that_is why the_package is still in_experimental
<mok0> ScottK, it's_worse,_you need to look at the rdepends of package libatlas3gf-base
<ScottK> Oh my.
<mok0> ScottK, I_think_libatlas-base-dev is_the_old_version of libatlas
<mok0> ScottK, doesn't_look realistic for Lucid, huh?
<ScottK>_Yes, I_was looking at current reverse-build-depends in Ubuntu, not_Debian_experimental.
<ScottK> mok0: For_the ones that are run time depends (and not_build depends), I suspect testing a_sub-set of them_would_be_sufficient if it goes_well.
<ScottK> You might ask upstream about_3.6 -> 3.8 binary compatibility.
<mok0> ScottK,_ok, I will investigate it
<siretart`> mok0: ScottK:_is the backporters meeting scheduled for_now or in 1h?
<mok0> siretart`:_heh
 *_ScottK looks at mok0.
<mok0> siretart`:_It's actually 18:00_UTC now,_but I think_I made a mistake when scheduling_the meeting
<siretart`> so,_what do we do now?
<mok0> On_the_fridge, it says_19:00_UTC,_so perhaps_we should wait
<siretart`>_TBH,_that would_suit_me better, I could then have_dinner_right now :-)
<mok0> siretart`: great
<mok0> I will_stick around #ubuntu-meeting in_case_anyone else shows up
<siretart`>_excellent. thanks
<mok0> siretart`: enjoy you_meal :-)
<siretart`> thanks :-)
<duanedesign> reviewing RC_bugs Debian_has closed_I have found one that affects Lucid and it hasnt been_merged.
<duanedesign> i am still learning the_motu processes so I_am unsure_about_what I should_do_next?
<geser> Have_both Ubuntu and Debian the same upstream_version?
<micahg> duanedesign:_have you seen this: http