ikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic natural language processing: An integrated model of scripts, lexicon, and memory. MIT press. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological review, 76(2), 165. Murdock Jr, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of experimental psychology, 64(5), 482. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189-234. 45 Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological review, 115(2), 357 Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 191-243. Rogers, C. L., Lister, J. J., Febo, D. M., Besing, J. M., & Abrams, H. B. (2006). Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 465-485. Scharenborg, O., Norris, D., Bosch, L., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). How should a speech recognizer work?. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 867-918. Shi, L. F. (2009). Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners' recognition of English words in competing signals. International Journal of Audiology, 48(5), 260270. Shi, L. F. (2010). Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 821-835. Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 304-324. Steeneken, H. J. (2018). 7 Noise Data-base. Retrieved 3 25, 2018, from ACOUSTEEN: http://www.steeneken.nl/7-noise-data-base/ Takata, Y., & Náb
ikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic natural language processing: An integrated model of script, vocabulary, and memory. MIT press. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word realization. Psychological review, 76(2), 165. Murdock Jr, B. B. (1962). The serial position consequence of free recall. Journal of experimental psychology, 64(5), 482. Norris, D. (1994). short list: A connectionist exemplar of continuous speech realization. Cognition, 52(3), 189 - 234. 45 Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological review, 115(2), 357 Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The potential - word constraint in the cleavage of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 191 - 243. Rogers, C. L., Lister, J. J., Febo, D. M., Besing, J. M., & Abrams, H. B. (2006). Effects of bilingualism, randomness, and reverberation on speech perception by hearer with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 465 - 485. Scharenborg, O., Norris, D., Bosch, L., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). How should a speech recognizer work? . Cognitive Science, 29(6), 867 - 918. Shi, L. F. (2009). Normal - hearing English - as - a - second - language hearer' recognition of English word in competing signals. International Journal of Audiology, 48(5), 260270. Shi, L. F. (2010). Perception of acoustically debauched sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 821 - 835. Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 304 - 324. Steeneken, H. J. (2018). 7 Noise Data - base. Retrieved 3 25, 2018, from ACOUSTEEN: http://www.steeneken.nl/7-noise-data-base/ Takata, Y., & Náb
ikkklainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic nxtural language procesving: Ah integrxted model of scripts, lexicoi, ane memiry. MIT press. Morton, J. (1969). Interacnion of ibfornqtion in word reconuitioh. Psyehilogical reviee, 76(2), 165. Murdocn Jr, B. B. (1962). The veficl position effect of free recall. Jotrnal og fxperimental pfychpjogy, 64(5), 482. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectiohist movel of continuois speech recognition. Cognltioj, 52(3), 189-234. 45 Norris, D., & McQkeen, J. M. (2008). Syortjust B: a Bayerian model of continuoos speech recognition. Psychologizal rzview, 115(2), 357 Nortnw, D., KcQueen, J. M., Cutlvr, A., & Butterflvld, S. (1997). Dhe posxible-word consbrainv in the segmentation of rontinuous speech. Codnitive Pvyehology, 34(3), 191-243. Rogers, C. L., Oiwter, B. J., Xebo, E. M., Beaiig, N. M., & Ahrajs, H. B. (2006). Efrects of bioingualism, noise, anc wvferberation kn speqcr perception by listeners with normal htarinf. Applied Psycholinguisrics, 27(3), 465-485. Scharenborg, O., Jorris, D., Fosch, L., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). How should a speech recogniser wkfk?. Eignitkce Science, 29(6), 867-918. Shi, L. F. (2009). Normal-hearing English-as-a-sqdomd-kanguage listekers' recognition og Fnbjish words in compecjnf signals. Internatlonal Jjurnao of Audijlogu, 48(5), 260270. Shi, L. F. (2010). Perception of qcoustically eegraded sentences in bilingucl lisjeners who differ in age of Euglish acquisitioj. Journal uf Speech, Languaee, sng Hearing Research, 53(4), 821-835. Shook, A., & Mariai, V. (2013). Che bilivguak langtage interwctiok network for comprfhensnon ox speech. Bllingualism: Language and Cognitmpn, 16(2), 304-324. Steenekgn, V. J. (2018). 7 Noise Data-nase. Retrieved 3 25, 2018, from ACOUSTGEN: http://wcw.steeveken.nl/7-noiae-data-bese/ Takata, Y., & Náb
ikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic natural language processing: model scripts, lexicon, memory. MIT press. information word recognition. Psychological 76(2), 165. Murdock B. B. (1962). The serial position of free recall. Journal of experimental psychology, 64(5), 482. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189-234. 45 Norris, D., & J. (2008). B: Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological review, 115(2), 357 Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in segmentation of continuous speech. Psychology, 34(3), 191-243. Rogers, C. Lister, J., Febo, M., J. & Abrams, H. (2006). Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 465-485. Scharenborg, D., Bosch, & J. (2005). How should recognizer work?. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 867-918. (2009). Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners' recognition of English words competing signals. Journal of Audiology, 48(5), 260270. Shi, F. (2010). Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Shook, A., & Marian, (2013). The bilingual interaction for of Bilingualism: Language Cognition, 16(2), 304-324. Steeneken, H. J. (2018). 7 Noise Data-base. Retrieved 25, 2018, from ACOUSTEEN: http://www.steeneken.nl/7-noise-data-base/ Takata, Y., & Náb
ikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic natUral languaGe proCesSinG: AN intEgraTed model of scriPTs, leXicon, and memory. MIT press. mortoN, J. (1969). iNterACtIon of InformaTIoN IN woRd ReCogNiTIoN. PsycHolOgical rEview, 76(2), 165. MurdoCk JR, B. b. (1962). The serial poSItIon effect oF frEe recall. JourNal Of expeRiMenTAl psyChoLogy, 64(5), 482. NOrris, D. (1994). sHortliSt: A connecTiONist moDEl of conTINuOus sPeech recognition. COGnITion, 52(3), 189-234. 45 Norris, D., & McQUeen, J. M. (2008). shORtLISt B: A BaYesian modeL oF contINuous spEEcH RECogNItion. PsycholoGical review, 115(2), 357 nOrrIs, D., McQUeEn, J. m., cutler, a., & ButtErFIelD, S. (1997). The possibLe-woRd constraInt in tHE segmenTAtion of ContinUouS spEech. cOgNiTivE PSYchOLoGy, 34(3), 191-243. ROGerS, C. L., ListeR, J. j., FEbo, D. M., besiNG, j. m., & abraMs, H. b. (2006). EffEcts oF bilingualism, NoiSe, anD RevErberAtion On spEeCh perCeptioN by liStEners with normal HearIng. ApplieD PsYcHolInGuistICs, 27(3), 465-485. SchaRenBorG, O., NorriS, D., Bosch, l., & mcQUeEN, j. m. (2005). HOw should a speech recOgNIZeR work?. CogNitive sCiEnCE, 29(6), 867-918. Shi, L. F. (2009). NoRmAl-hEariNG engliSh-as-A-SeCond-langUage liSTeNeRs' recogNiTion of enGliSh wOrds iN CompEting sIgnals. InTernaTIonal Journal of aUdiology, 48(5), 260270. Shi, L. F. (2010). pErCEPtIOn of AcoUstically deGradED senTencES iN biLInguaL listEnERs WHo differ in age of EnglIsH acquiSitioN. Journal of SpeEch, LanguagE, AND Hearing reseARcH, 53(4), 821-835. shook, A., & Marian, V. (2013). THe bilIngual langUAge interActioN network For compreHENsion of sPeeCh. BIliNguALIsM: Language and COGNitiOn, 16(2), 304-324. steenekEn, H. j. (2018). 7 Noise DAta-BasE. ReTriEvEd 3 25, 2018, from ACOuSTEEN: htTp://WwW.sTeEneKen.nl/7-NOise-data-BaSe/ TAkAta, y., & Náb
ikkulainen, R. (1993). Sub symbolic n atura l l ang ua ge p roce ssing: An inte g rate d model of scripts, le xicon ,a nd m e mo ry. M IT pres s .M o rto n,  J . ( 19 6 9) . Int era ction o f informat ion  i n word recog n it ion. Psych olo gical review , 7 6(2),16 5.M urdoc k J r, B.  B. (1 9 62). T he serial  p o sition effecto f  f reerecall. Journal o f  e x perimental psy cholog y, 64 ( 5 ),482 . Norris,D.  (199 4 ). Shor t li s t :  Ac onnectionistmodel of co n tin uous s pe ech recogn ition .C ogn ition, 52(3 ), 1 89-234. 4 5 Norr i s, D.,&  McQuee n, J.M.(20 08). Sh or tli st B:a  B aye s ian  model o fco ntinu ouss p e e ch r eco gnit ion.Psychological  re view ,  11 5(2),  357Norr is , D.,  McQue en, J .M., Cutler, A.,  & B utterfiel d,S.  (1 99 7). T h e poss ibl e-w ord con straint inth e s eg mentation of conti nu o u sspeech.Cognit i ve  P s ychology ,34( 3),1 9 1-243 . Ro g er s, C. L. , List e r,  J . J., F eb o, D.M. , B esi ng, J .  M.,  & Abr ams, H.B. (2 0 06). Effects o f  bilingualism ,  n o i se ,  and  re verberation  ons peec h pe r ce pti o n byliste ne r sw ith normal hearing.  A pplied  Psyc holinguistics , 27(3), 4 6 5 - 485. Sch aren b or g , O., Norris,D., B osch, L.,&  McQueen , J.M. (2005 ). How sh o u ld a spe ech  re cog niz e r  w ork?. Cogniti v e  Sci en ce, 29( 6),  867-91 8.Shi , L . F .(2009). N ormal-he ar in gEn gli sh-as - a-second -l ang ua geliste n ers' r ecogn itio nof Eng lish wo r ds i n co mp et ingsig na ls. I nter n ati onal Jo urnal ofAud i olog y,  4 8(5), 2 60270. Shi, L .F. (2010).  P erc eption o f acoust ically degraded sentenc e s in bi lin guallist eners who  di ffer i n a g e of E nglish  acqu is iti o n . Jou r n al  of  S peech, Lan g u age , and  H eari ng Rese arch, 53(4), 821-8 3 5.Shook, A., &Mar ian, V .(20 1 3) .  Th eb ili n g ual language in teractionne t wo rk for com p reh en sion of  speech . Bil i ngualis m: Langua ge and Co gn itio n ,  16 (2), 304-3 24. Stee neken, H. J. (2 0 18 ). 7Noi se Dat a- bas e. Re trieve d  325, 2 018, f ro m ACOU STEEN :http://w ww.steeneken.nl/7-noise -data- base/  Ta kata, Y.,  &N áb
ikkulainen, R._(1993). Subsymbolic_natural language processing: An_integrated model_of_scripts, lexicon,_and_memory. MIT press._Morton, J. (1969)._Interaction of information in_word recognition. Psychological_review,_76(2), 165. Murdock Jr, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall._Journal_of experimental_psychology,_64(5),_482. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist:_A connectionist model of continuous_speech recognition._Cognition, 52(3), 189-234. 45 Norris, D., & McQueen,_J._M. (2008). Shortlist_B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological_review, 115(2), 357 Norris, D., McQueen,_J. M., Cutler,_A.,_&_Butterfield, S. (1997). The_possible-word constraint in the segmentation of_continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 191-243._Rogers, C. L., Lister, J. J., Febo,_D. M., Besing, J. M., &_Abrams, H. B. (2006). Effects_of bilingualism,_noise, and reverberation on speech_perception by listeners_with normal_hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics,_27(3), 465-485. Scharenborg, O., Norris, D.,_Bosch, L., &_McQueen, J. M. (2005). How should_a_speech recognizer work?._Cognitive_Science,_29(6), 867-918._Shi, L. F._(2009)._Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language_listeners'_recognition of English words in competing_signals._International Journal of Audiology, 48(5), 260270. Shi,_L. F. (2010). Perception_of_acoustically degraded sentences in_bilingual listeners who differ in_age of English acquisition. Journal of_Speech, Language,_and Hearing_Research, 53(4), 821-835. Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual_language interaction network for comprehension of_speech. Bilingualism: Language and_Cognition, 16(2),_304-324._Steeneken, H. J._(2018)._7 Noise_Data-base. Retrieved 3 25, 2018, from ACOUSTEEN:_http://www.steeneken.nl/7-noise-data-base/ Takata,_Y., & Náb