 que le hasard heureux des découvertes, chaque jour, de quelque fait nouveau en vient grossir le trésor." (Duhem 1915, 106) 34 As Buchwald and Hong (2003, 181) elucidate, this implicit knowledge can become explicit at a given moment: "Specifically, by 'unarticulated knowledge' we intend knowledge that is generally unexpressed but that guides research. This not at all the same thing as unexpressible knowledge, such as the kind of skill that is needed to form a beautiful piano leg on a lathe. Not at all – it is knowledge that is unexpressed, that exists below the surface of explicit discourse. Such knowledge is accordingly tacit, in the sense of unspoken, but it can be – and often eventually is – heard, particularly when a science settles into a reasonably stable form." Víctor Manuel Hernández Márquez – Was Pierre Duhem an Esprit de Finesse? 105 Closing Remarks If what I have argued thus far seems plausible, then we can ask whether Duhem's use of the distinction between the two mentalities has the significance scholars like Martin, Stoffel, and Cortese ascribe to it; or whether, on the other hand, Duhem resorts to the dichotomy because of its popularity among the French audiences at the turn of the century without much of a concern for a consistent and systematic treatment. The latter may be due to the fact that Duhem's oeuvre addressed three different audiences: those who, following Holton, I have called New Apollonians and Dionysians, and, of course, their theoretical and experimental counterparts. Additionally, in some cases, a number of these writings were revised and published – in part or in whole – for a different type of audience, as is the case, for example, with La théorie physique, but also with Le mixte et la combinaison chimique (1902), which takes up previously published essays with a philosophical audience in mind, and is, therefore, published in La revue de philosophie – a journal with Catholic inclinations in which Duhem participated in from its inception. As I noted toward the beginning of this essay, the philosophical inquiry into the end and value of theoretical physics is related to the process of institutionalization and recognition of the discipline; or, as Bordoni (2012, 128) states, "the emergence of theoretical physics corresponds to a new sensitivity to metatheoretical
que le hasard heureux des découvertes, chaque jour, de quelque fait nouveau en vient grossir le trésor. " (Duhem 1915, 106) 34 As Buchwald and Hong (2003, 181) elucidate, this implicit knowledge can become explicit at a given here and now: " Specifically, by' unarticulated cognition' we intend knowledge that is by and large unexpressed but that lead research. This not at all the like thing as unexpressible knowledge, such as the kind of skill that is necessitate to form a beautiful piano leg on a lathe. Not at wholly – it is knowledge that is unexpressed, that exists below the surface of explicit sermon. Such knowledge is accordingly tacit, in the sense of unspoken, but it can be – and often finally is – heard, particularly when a science decide into a reasonably stable phase. " Víctor Manuel Hernández Márquez – Was Pierre Duhem an Esprit de Finesse? 105 Closing Remarks If what I have argued therefore far seems plausible, then we can necessitate whether Duhem's use of the distinction between the two mentalities has the meaning scholars like Martin, Stoffel, and Cortese ascribe to it; or whether, on the other hand, Duhem resorts to the dichotomy because of its popularity among the French audiences at the turn of the century without much of a concern for a consistent and systematic treatment. The latter may be due to the fact that Duhem's oeuvre addressed three different audiences: those who, following Holton, I have called New Apollonians and Dionysians, and, of path, their theoretical and experimental counterparts. Additionally, in some cases, a issue of these writing were revised and published – in part or in solid – for a different type of audience, as is the case, for case, with La théorie physique, but also with Le mixte et la combinaison chimique (1902), which takes up previously published essays with a philosophical consultation in mind, and is, therefore, published in La revue de philosophie – a journal with Catholic tendency in which Duhem participated in from its origin. As I note toward the beginning of this essay, the philosophical inquiry into the end and value of theoretical physics is relate to the process of institutionalization and recognition of the discipline; or, as Bordoni (2012, 128) states, " the emergence of theoretical physics corresponds to a new sensitivity to metatheoretical
 quf le hasard heureux des aécouvertes, chaqoe jour, ve quelsue fait nouveau en vient grossir le teésor." (Euhem 1915, 106) 34 As Buchwald avd Hong (2003, 181) elucidare, tiis implicit knoxmedge can beckle erpoicit at a givgn moment: "Spacifically, by 'gnxrciculated knowledge' we intend knowleqge thay ls generally ugexpgefsed but that guides research. This not at all the same thimg as unexpressible knowlefge, duch as the kind ov skill thaj is beeded to fofm a beautpyul piano lgg on a lathe. Not at all – it is ynowlzdge that iw ynedkressed, that exisns below the surface mf explocit discourse. Surh kbowledge is accordingny tacit, in the segse of unvpkken, but it can bw – and mftet evdbtuxllg ms – heard, pacticularly shen a sciebce settles into a tewwonably stabls form." Vístor Manuel Hernández Márquez – Was Pierre Dugem an Esprit de Finessw? 105 Closing Remarks If what I hwve argued thus far seems plausible, then we can avk whxtfer Dmhem'r ude of the distinction between the two mentaliejex mas the significcnce scholars lile Msttin, Stoffel, avd Corcsss ascribe to it; or whethet, on tye other rand, Duhem resorts to the dichoromy because if its popularity cmong the Frznch aodiencrs at the turn of the czntury without mufh of a ckvcern for a conskstvnt dnd systtoatic treatment. Tre latter may be due to jhe face that Duhfm's ocgvre addressed thrfe diyferett audiencfs: those who, following Holton, I have called Ngw Dponlonians and Cionysians, anq, of course, thgir theorztical and experpmental cmunterparts. Additionally, ln some casev, a numbqr od thwse wrigkngs were revixed and plbjishwd – in part or in xholg – for a differenc uype of audience, as is tje cwve, for exampne, wkth Ka théurie physiqme, cut slso with Le mixte ed la combinaison chimiauc (1902), which jakes up [reviously punlished essays witj a piiloso'hical auqience in mind, and is, therefors, publishfd ln La revue dq phllosjphie – a jpurnal with Catholic inclinations in whmch Duhem participated un from its inceptipk. As I noted towawd the becinning of this essat, the philosophicsl inquiry into the ehd and valuf of theoretical physics is related to the process of institutionalizatiob and cesognition or thr disbipjnne; or, ws Blcdoni (2012, 128) states, "thv emergence of theoretical physirs correspmnbs to a new sensitivity to meyagheoretical
que le hasard heureux des découvertes, chaque quelque nouveau en grossir le trésor." Buchwald Hong (2003, 181) this implicit knowledge become explicit at a given moment: by 'unarticulated knowledge' we intend knowledge that is generally unexpressed but that guides This not at all the same thing as unexpressible knowledge, such as the of that needed form a beautiful piano leg on a lathe. Not at all – it is knowledge that unexpressed, that exists below the surface of explicit Such knowledge is accordingly in the sense of unspoken, it be – often is heard, particularly when science settles into a reasonably stable form." Víctor Manuel Hernández Márquez – Was Pierre Duhem an Esprit Finesse? 105 If what have thus seems plausible, then ask whether Duhem's use of the two mentalities has the significance scholars like Martin, and Cortese to it; or whether, on the hand, Duhem resorts to the dichotomy because of popularity among the French audiences at the turn of the century without much of a a consistent and systematic The latter may due the that oeuvre addressed different audiences: those who, following Holton, I have called New Apollonians Dionysians, and, of course, their theoretical and experimental counterparts. Additionally, cases, number of these were revised and published in or in whole – different of the for with La théorie physique, also with Le mixte et combinaison chimique (1902), which with a philosophical audience in mind, and is, published in La revue de philosophie – journal with Catholic inclinations in which Duhem participated in from its inception. I noted beginning of this essay, the philosophical inquiry into end and value of physics is related to the process of institutionalization and of discipline; or, Bordoni (2012, 128) "the emergence of physics corresponds to sensitivity to
 que le hasard heureux des décoUvertes, chaQue joUr, dE quElQue fAit nOuveau en vient gROssiR le trésor." (Duhem 1915, 106) 34 As BuchwaLd and hoNG (2003, 181) eluCIdAte, thIs impliCIt KNOwlEdGe Can BeCOmE explIciT at a givEn moment: "SpEciFiCally, by 'unartICuLated knowlEdgE' we intend knoWleDge thaT iS geNErallY unExpreSsed buT That guIdes reseaRcH. this noT At all thE SAmE thiNg as unexpressible KNoWLedge, such as the Kind of SkILl THAt iS neEded to form A bEautiFUl piano LEg ON A LatHE. Not at all – it is Knowledge thAT is UnexprEsSed, THat exiSts beLoW The Surface of exPlicIt discourSe. Such KNowledgE Is accorDingly TacIt, iN the SEnSe Of uNsPOkeN, BuT it CAn bE – and ofteN eVeNtualLy is – HEARD, parTicUlarLy wheN a science settLes Into A ReaSonabLy staBle fOrM." VíctOr ManuEl HerNáNdez Márquez – Was PIerrE Duhem an ESprIt De FInEsse? 105 CLOsing REmaRks if what I Have argUEd tHuS FAR sEems plausible, then wE cAN AsK whether duhem's USe Of THe distinCtIon BetwEEN the tWo meNTaLities haS the siGNiFiCance scHoLars liKe marTin, stoffEL, and cortesE ascribe To it; oR Whether, on the otHEr hand, Duhem reSOrTS To THe diChoTomy because Of itS PopuLariTY aMonG The FrEnch aUdIEnCEs at the turn of the cenTuRy withOut muCh of a concern fOr a consistENT And systeMatiC TrEAtment. The latteR may bE due to the fACt that DuHem's oEuvre addRessed thrEE DifferenT auDieNceS: thOSE wHo, following HoLTOn, I hAvE called new apollonIanS anD DiOnySiAns, and, of cOurse, theIr ThEoReTicAl and EXperimenTaL coUnTerParts. aDditioNally, In soMe CaSEs, a Number oF ThESE wriTiNgS werE reViSed anD pubLIshEd – in parT or in wholE – foR A difFeReNt type oF audience, as is ThE case, for exAmPle, With La THÉorie phySique, but also with Le mixte ET la combInaIson cHimiQue (1902), which tAkeS up preVioUSly pubLished EssayS wIth A PHilosOPHiCal AuDience in miND, And Is, theReFore, PublishEd in La revue de philoSOphIe – a journal witH CaTholIC InCliNAtIOns In WHicH dUhem participateD in from its InCEpTion. As I notED toWaRd the beGinning Of thiS Essay, thE philosopHical inquIrY intO THe eNd and value Of theoreTical physICs is rELaTed to The ProcesS oF inStituTionalIZatIon anD recogNiTion of The diScIpline; or, As Bordoni (2012, 128) states, "the emergEnce of TheorEtiCal physicS coRResPonds to a nEw seNsitivity tO meTatHeoreTicAL
 que le hasard heureux des  découvert es, c haq uejo ur,de q uelque fait no u veau  en vient grossir le t résor ." (Duh e m1915,  106) 3 4  A s Buc hw al d a nd Ho ng (2 003 , 181)elucidate,  th is  implicit kn o wl edge can b eco me explicitata give nmom e nt: " Spe cific ally,b y 'una rticulate dk nowled g e' we i n t en d kn owledge that is g e ne r ally unexpress ed but  t h at g uid esresearch.Th is no t  at all th e s ame thing as unex pressible k n owl edge,su cha s thekindof ski ll that isneed ed to for m a be a utifulp iano le g on a  la the . No t  a tall  – iti skno w led ge thatis  u nexpr esse d , t hatexi stsbelow  the surfaceofexpl i cit  disc ourse . Su ch  know ledgeis ac co rdingly tacit,in t he senseofun spo ke n, bu t  it ca n b e –  and of ten eve n tua ll y i s– heard, particula rl y wh en a sci ence s e tt le s  into are aso nabl y stabl e fo r m. " Víctor  Manue l  H er nándezMá rquez–Was  Pi erreD uhem  an Es prit deFines s e? 105 Closing Remarks If wh a tI ha v e ar gue d thus farseem s  pla usib l e,  th e n wecan a sk wh e ther Duhem's use of  t he dis tinct ion between t he two men t a l ities ha s th e  s i gnificance sch olars  like Mart i n, Stoff el, a nd Corte se ascrib e to it; o r w het her , o n th e other hand, D uhem  r esortstothe dic hot omy  be cau se  of its p opularit yam on gthe  Fren c h audien ce s a tthe  turn of the  cent urywi th o utmuch of ac o ncer nfo r acon si stent  and sys tematic  treatmen t.T he l at te r may b e due to thefa ct that Du he m's  oeuvr e addresse d three different audie n ces: th ose  who,  fol lowing Ho lto n, I h ave called  New A pollo ni ans a nd Di o n ys ian s,  and, of c o u rse , the ir  the oretica l and experimental cou nterparts. Ad dit iona l l y,  in so m e c as e s,a number of these  writingswe r erevised an d  pu bl ished –  in par t ori n whole  – for adifferent  t ypeo f  au dience, as  is thecase, for examp l e,  with  La  théor ie  ph ysiqu e, but als o wit h Le m ix te etla co mb inaisonchimique (1902), whichtakesup pr evi ously pub lis h edessays wi th a  philosoph ica l a udien cei n min d, a n dis, there fore ,  publishe d  i n L a re vue de phil o s o phi e – a  jo u rnal w ithCatholic inclinat i ons in which D uhem p art ici p ated  i n from its inc ept io n .  As I no te d toward th e beginn in g  of t his es say, t he phil o s op h ical i nqui ryinto theend  a n d value  o ft heoret ical  p hysics  is re l ated t o the process of  inst i t ution a liz ation  a nd reco g niti on of thediscipline;  or, a s Bo rdoni  (2012,  1 28) st ate s,  "the emer g ence of t heore tical p hy sics  co rrespo ndst o  a ne w se ns iti vity to m e t at h eo re t ica l
 que_le hasard_heureux des découvertes, chaque_jour, de_quelque_fait nouveau_en_vient grossir le_trésor." (Duhem 1915,_106) 34 As Buchwald_and Hong (2003,_181)_elucidate, this implicit knowledge can become explicit at a given moment: "Specifically, by 'unarticulated_knowledge'_we intend_knowledge_that_is generally unexpressed but that_guides research. This not at_all the_same thing as unexpressible knowledge, such as the_kind_of skill that_is needed to form a beautiful piano leg on_a lathe. Not at all –_it is knowledge_that_is_unexpressed, that exists below_the surface of explicit discourse. Such_knowledge is accordingly tacit, in the_sense of unspoken, but it can be_– and often eventually is –_heard, particularly when a science_settles into_a reasonably stable form." Víctor_Manuel Hernández Márquez_– Was_Pierre Duhem an_Esprit de Finesse? 105 Closing Remarks_If what I_have argued thus far seems plausible,_then_we can ask_whether_Duhem's_use of_the distinction between_the_two mentalities_has_the significance scholars like Martin, Stoffel,_and_Cortese ascribe to it; or whether, on_the other hand, Duhem_resorts_to the dichotomy because_of its popularity among the_French audiences at the turn of_the century_without much_of a concern for a consistent and systematic treatment. The latter_may be due to the fact_that Duhem's oeuvre addressed_three different_audiences:_those who, following_Holton,_I have_called New Apollonians and Dionysians, and, of_course, their_theoretical and experimental counterparts. Additionally, in_some cases, a number_of_these writings were revised and published_– in part or in whole_– for a different type_of_audience,_as is the case, for_example, with La théorie physique, but_also with Le_mixte et la combinaison chimique (1902), which_takes_up previously published essays with a_philosophical_audience in mind, and is, therefore,_published_in_La revue de philosophie –_a journal with Catholic inclinations in_which Duhem participated in from its inception. As I_noted toward the_beginning of this essay, the_philosophical_inquiry_into the end and value of theoretical physics is related_to the_process of institutionalization_and recognition of the discipline; or, as Bordoni (2012, 128)_states, "the emergence of theoretical physics corresponds_to a new sensitivity to metatheoretical