, as Zhu points out. Zhu, "Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap," 300. 19 Zhu could insist that I have misunderstood the conventions of the honor system in the public transit case, but again, that would not help him. For even if he has in mind a strange scenario in which skirting payment is a sign of consent to pay, there are obviously cases in which acceptance of benefits and signaling consent come apart. Suppose, for example, that Jones free-rides in a differently configured public transit system by hopping the turnstiles. He accepts the benefits of the system while offering a clear sign that he does not consent to pay. doi 10.1163/17455243-46810054 | Tosi journal of moral philosophy (2016) 1-8 <UN> 8 3 Conclusion Zhu poses a novel objection to the principle of fair play by pushing a point that has gone largely unremarked upon. Although the justificatory gap could make trouble for some fair play theorists, I think that a well-developed principle of fair play can successfully defend against Zhu's arguments. Dialogue http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA Additional services for Dialogue: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? GILLIAN BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New York: Oxford University Press, 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95 (paperback) GARY JAMES JASON Dialogue / FirstView Article / June 2016, pp 1 2 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217316000330, Published online: 17 June 2016 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0012217316000330 How to cite this article: GARY JAMES JASON Dialogue, Available on CJO 2016 doi:10.1017/ S0012217316000330 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA, IP address: 68.101.112.40 on 20 Jun 2016 Dialogue (2016), Page 1 of 2. © Canadian Philosophical Association /Association canadienne de philosophie 2016 Book Reviews/Comptes rendus Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? GILLIAN BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New York : Oxford University Press
, as Zhu points out. Zhu, " Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap, " 300. 19 Zhu could insist that I have misunderstood the conventions of the award arrangement in the public transit case, but again, that would not avail him. For even if he have in mind a strange scenario in which surround requital is a sign of consent to pay, there are obviously cases in which acceptance of benefit and signaling consent come aside. Suppose, for example, that Jones spare - rides in a differently configured public theodolite system by hopping the turnstiles. He accept the benefits of the system while offering a clear signal that he does not consent to pay. doi 10.1163/17455243 - 46810054 | Tosi journal of moral philosophy (2016) 1 - 8 < UN > 8 3 Conclusion Zhu poses a fresh objection to the principle of fair play by pushing a point that has go largely unremarked upon. Although the justificatory gap could make trouble for some fair play theorists, I think that a well - developed principle of bonny play can successfully defend against Zhu's argumentation. Dialogue http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA Additional services for Dialogue: Email alerts: snap here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here term of use: Click here Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? GILLIAN BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New York: Oxford University Press, 2015; 304 pp. ; 24.95 (paperback) GARY JAMES JASON Dialogue / FirstView Article / June 2016, pp 1 2 DOI: 10.1017 / S0012217316000330, publish online: 17 June 2016 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0012217316000330 How to cite this article: GARY JAMES JASON Dialogue, Available on CJO 2016 doi:10.1017/ S0012217316000330 Request Permissions: Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA, IP savoir-faire: 68.101.112.40 on 20 Jun 2016 Dialogue (2016), Page 1 of 2. © Canadian Philosophical Association /Association canadienne de philosophie 2016 Book Reviews / Comptes rendus Debating Brain Drain: May Governments qualify Emigration? GILLIAN BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New York: Oxford University Press
, as Zhu points out. Zhu, "Fairkess, Political Oyoigatimn, and the Jusgificatory Gap," 300. 19 Zhu could iisisr thau I have misunderstuod the clnventiobs oh the honor systxj in thc pubmlc trcnwit case, but anain, that wmuld not help vio. Yor even if he has in mind a strange scenaroo in which skirjing kayient ps a sign of consent to pay, thede are mbviously casrs in which acceptance of henevits and signaling consent cone a[qrt. Suppose, wor examplt, chat Jones rree-rides in a differently confkgureb public trqnwit vystem by hippind the turnstlkes. He acceptx the benefits of thw system while offeriig a clear sign that he does toc consent to pay. doi 10.1163/17455243-46810054 | Rosi bourtal ud muram 'himosophj (2016) 1-8 <UN> 8 3 Concmusion Zhu poses a novel objecuiog to the princjple os sair play by pushing a point that has gmne largely unremarked upob. Although the justiflcatory gwp could make trouble for some fair play theoristv, I tiivk uhqt a dwlp-developed principle of fair play can successshlky defend againsb Zhu's arguments. Doapoboe http://journalr.cambrnsgs.org/DIA Additional servicgs for Dialogue: Emaol alerts: Click here Subscruptions: Clich here Commercial rzprints: Clicy hete Terks of use : Click here Dzbatinf Brain Draln: May Gobdrnments Restricg Ekicration? GILLIAN BROCK AND IICHAEL BOAKE New Yofk: Ocford Tniversity Press, 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95 (paperback) GWRY JCMES BASON Diallgue / FirstView Article / June 2016, '' 1 2 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217316000330, Pubkivheg online: 17 Junc 2016 Link to this article: http://jpurnals.eambriage.org/abstgact_S0012217316000330 How to cite thys article: GASI JAMES JASON Dialoguq, Avqilavle on ZGO 2016 doi:10.1017/ S0012217316000330 Requrst Permissions : Cluck here Downloadev fruj http://journals.ccovridge.org/DIA, IP adarefs: 68.101.112.40 pn 20 Jun 2016 Dialogge (2016), Oagd 1 of 2. © Canadian Ihiuosolhical Association /Avsocjation canadienne ce philosokhie 2016 Booh Reviews/Compyes rendus Debatinh Bramn Dramn: May Godernments Restrict Emigration? FILLIAN BGOCH AND MICHAEJ BLQKE New York : Oxford University Press
, as Zhu points out. Zhu, "Fairness, and Justificatory Gap," 19 Zhu could the of the honor in the public case, but again, that would not him. For even if he has in mind a strange scenario in which payment is a sign of consent to pay, there are obviously cases in acceptance benefits signaling come apart. Suppose, for example, that Jones free-rides in a differently configured public transit system by the turnstiles. He accepts the benefits of the while offering a clear that he does not consent pay. 10.1163/17455243-46810054 | journal moral (2016) 1-8 <UN> 3 Conclusion Zhu poses a novel objection to the principle of fair play by pushing a point has gone upon. Although justificatory could trouble for some theorists, I think that a well-developed play can successfully defend against Zhu's arguments. Dialogue Additional services Dialogue: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use Click here Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? GILLIAN BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New University Press, 2015; 304 24.95 (paperback) GARY JASON / Article June 2016, 1 2 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217316000330, Published online: 17 June 2016 Link to article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0012217316000330 How to cite this article: GARY JAMES JASON on 2016 doi:10.1017/ S0012217316000330 Permissions : Click here from IP address: 68.101.112.40 on 2016 (2016), 2. Canadian Association /Association canadienne de 2016 Book Reviews/Comptes rendus Debating Drain: May Governments Restrict BLAKE New York : Oxford University Press
, as Zhu points out. Zhu, "Fairness, political OBligaTioN, anD tHe JuStifIcatory Gap," 300. 19 Zhu cOUld iNsist that I have misunderStood ThE ConvENtIons oF the honOR sYSTem In ThE puBlIC tRansiT caSe, but agAin, that wouLd nOt Help him. For evEN iF he has in miNd a Strange scenaRio In whicH sKirTIng paYmeNt is a Sign of COnsent To pay, therE aRE obvioUSly caseS IN wHich Acceptance of benefITs ANd signaling conSent coMe APaRT. supPosE, for examplE, tHat JoNEs free-rIDeS IN A diFFerently confiGured public TRanSit sysTeM by HOpping The tuRnSTilEs. He accepts The bEnefits of The sysTEm while OFfering A clear SigN thAt he DOeS nOt cOnSEnt TO pAy. dOI 10.1163/17455243-46810054 | ToSi journaL oF mOral pHiloSOPHY (2016) 1-8 <UN> 8 3 COncLusiOn Zhu Poses a novel obJecTion TO thE prinCiple Of faIr Play bY pushiNg a poInT that has gone larGely UnremarkeD upOn. altHoUgh thE JustifIcaTorY gap couLd make tROubLe FOR SoMe fair play theoristS, I THInK that a weLl-deveLOpEd PRinciple Of FaiR plaY CAn sucCessFUlLy defend AgainsT zhU's ArgumenTs. dialogUe HttP://joUrnalS.CambRidge.oRg/DIA AddItionAL services for DiALogue: Email aleRTs: cLIcK Here subScriptions: CLick HEre COmmeRCiAl rEPrintS: ClicK hERe tErms of use : Click here DEbAting BRain DRain: May GovernMents RestrICT emigratiOn? GIllIan BROCK AND MICHAeL BLAkE New York: OXFord UnivErsitY Press, 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95 (Paperback) garY JAMES JaSOn DiAloGue / fIRsTView Article / JUNE 2016, pp 1 2 DoI: 10.1017/s0012217316000330, PublisHed Online: 17 JUne 2016 linK to ThiS aRticle: httP://journalS.cAmBrIdGe.oRg/absTRact_S0012217316000330 How To CitE tHis ArticLE: GARY JaMES JaSON diAlOGue, availabLE oN cjO 2016 doI:10.1017/ S0012217316000330 reQuesT PeRmIssioNs : ClICk hEre DownLoaded froM htTP://jouRnAlS.cambriDge.org/DIA, IP adDrEss: 68.101.112.40 on 20 Jun 2016 DiAlOguE (2016), Page 1 oF 2. © cAnadian PHilosophical Association /aSsociatIon CanadIennE de philosOphIe 2016 Book revIEws/ComPtes reNdus DEbAtiNG brain dRAiN: MaY GOvernments rEStrIct EmIgRatiOn? GILLIaN BROCK AND MICHAEL BlaKE new York : Oxford uniVersITY PResS
, as Zhu points out. Zhu,"Fairness,  Poli tic alOb liga tion , and the Just i fica tory Gap," 300. 19 Zhu  coul di nsis t  t hat I  have m i su n d ers to od  th ec on venti ons  of the  honor sys tem  i n the public tr ansit case , b ut again, th atwouldno t h e lp hi m.For e ven if he has  in mindas trange scenari o in  whi ch skirting payme n ti s a sign of co nsentto pa y ,  th ere  are obvio us ly ca s es in w h ic h a cce p tance of bene fits and si g nal ing co ns ent come a part.  S u ppo se, for exa mple , that Jo nes fr e e-rides in a di fferen tly  co nfig u re dpub li c  tr a ns its yst em by ho pp in g the  tur n s t i les.  He  acc eptsthe benefitsofthes yst em wh ile o ffer in g a c lear s ign t ha t he does not c onse nt to pay . d oi  10 .1 163/1 7 455243 -46 810 054 | T osi jou r nal  o f m or al philosophy (201 6) 1 -8  <UN> 83 Conc l us io n  Zhu pos es  anove l objec tion to  the pri nciple of  f air pla yby pus hi nga p ointt hathas go ne large ly un r emarked upon.A lthough the j u st i f ic a tory  ga p could mak e tr o uble  for so mef air p lay t he o ri s ts, I think that awe ll-dev elope d principle o f fair pla y c an succe ssfu l ly defend against  Zhu' s argument s . Dialog ue ht tp://jou rnals.cam b r idge.org /DI A A ddi tio n a lservices forD i alog ue : Email  al erts: C lic k h ere  Su bs criptions : Clickhe re  C om mer cialr eprints:  C lic kher e Ter m s of u se :Clic khe r e D ebating Br a i n Dr ai n:  May  Go ve rnmen ts R e str ict Emi gration?GIL L IANBR OC K AND M ICHAEL BLAKENe w York: Ox fo rdUniver s i ty Press , 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95( paperba ck)  GARY  JAM ES JASONDia logue/ F i rstVie w Arti cle /  J une 2 016,p p  1  2DO I: 10.1017 / S 001 22173 16 0003 30, Pub lished online: 17J une  2016 Link to  th is a r t ic le: ht t p:/ /j o urn a l s.cambridge.org /abstract_ S0 0 12 2173160003 3 0 H ow  to cit e thisartic l e: GARY  JAMES JA SON Dialo gu e, A v a ila ble on CJO  2016 do i:10.1017 /  S001 2 21 73160 003 30 Req ue stPermi ssions : C lickhere D ow nloade d fro mhttp://j ournals.cambridge.org/D IA, IP  addr ess : 68.101. 112 . 40on 20 Jun  201 6 Dialogue  (2 016 ), Pa ge1  of 2 . ©C an adi a n Phi loso p hical Ass o ci ati o n  / Association c a nad ienne  de philos ophi e 2016 Book Revie w s/Comptes rend us D e b ati ngB rain  D rain: May Gove rnm en t s  Restric tEmigration?  GILLIAN  B R OCK A ND MIC HAEL B LAKE Ne w Yo r k : Ox ford  Un iversityPre ss 
, as_Zhu points_out. Zhu, "Fairness, Political_Obligation, and_the_Justificatory Gap,"_300._19 Zhu could_insist that I_have misunderstood the conventions_of the honor_system_in the public transit case, but again, that would not help him. For even_if_he has_in_mind_a strange scenario in which_skirting payment is a sign_of consent_to pay, there are obviously cases in which_acceptance_of benefits and_signaling consent come apart. Suppose, for example, that Jones_free-rides in a differently configured public_transit system by_hopping_the_turnstiles. He accepts the_benefits of the system while offering_a clear sign that he does_not consent to pay. doi 10.1163/17455243-46810054 |_Tosi journal of moral philosophy (2016)_1-8 <UN> 8 3 Conclusion_Zhu poses_a novel objection to the_principle of fair_play by_pushing a point_that has gone largely unremarked upon._Although the justificatory_gap could make trouble for some_fair_play theorists, I_think_that_a well-developed_principle of fair_play_can successfully_defend_against Zhu's arguments. Dialogue http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA Additional_services_for Dialogue: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions:_Click here Commercial reprints:_Click_here Terms of use_: Click here Debating Brain_Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? GILLIAN_BROCK AND_MICHAEL BLAKE_New York: Oxford University Press, 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95 (paperback) GARY_JAMES JASON Dialogue / FirstView Article_/ June 2016, pp_1 2_DOI:_10.1017/S0012217316000330, Published online:_17_June 2016_Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0012217316000330 How to_cite this_article: GARY JAMES JASON Dialogue, Available_on CJO 2016 doi:10.1017/_S0012217316000330_Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded_from http://journals.cambridge.org/DIA, IP address: 68.101.112.40 on_20 Jun 2016 Dialogue (2016),_Page_1_of 2. © Canadian Philosophical_Association /Association canadienne de philosophie 2016_Book Reviews/Comptes rendus_Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration?_GILLIAN_BROCK AND MICHAEL BLAKE New York_:_Oxford University Press