 discourse below: 123 F. Moltmann (48)??? John won the race. In that case, Mary will be happy. Here that case should refer to the kind of situation in which John won the race. However, being described by an assertion of the same speaker, this kind of situation does not come with alternatives and thus does not belong to a case space. The Case Space Requirement can be fulfilled, though, when the preceding sentence is asserted by a different speaker: (49) A: John won the race. B: In that case, Mary will be happy. The case-anaphor in B's utterance is acceptable only if B is not yet convinced that John won the race. In that case, the case-anaphor will relate to a weaker attitude than belief, say of B's hypothetical acceptance that John won the race as a reaction to A's assertion. That attitude allows for alternatives and thus sets up a case space. The Case Space Requirement is also apparent in the absence of an antecedent sentence introducing the case. Compare (50a) and (50b) uttered out of the blue: (50) a. In that situation, I would flee. b. In that case, I would flee. (50a) and (50b) are appropriate in different visual contexts. Whereas (50a) is appropriate when confronted with a single situation, (50b) is acceptable only when pointing at one situation among several that are visually displayed.28 Let us then turn to case-anaphora relating to the utterance of a preceding sentence by the same speaker. First, yes/no-questions support case-anaphora, as in the singlespeaker discourse below, in which the speaker decides not to wait for the addressee's answer to the question: (51) Did John win the race?... In that case, Mary will be happy. A yes/no-question is associated with an attitude of inquiry supporting two alternatives and thus sets up a case space, a requirement for the use of a caseanaphor within the same context. Also disjunctive declarative sentences permit case-anaphora. The reason is that an assertion with a disjunctive content permits as many alternatives as there are disjuncts. As such, it sets up a case space for a case-anaphor applying within the same local context29: (52) a. John will interview or Mary will. In either case, we should be well
discourse below: 123 F. Moltmann (48)? ?? John won the race. In that subject, Mary will be felicitous. Here that case should refer to the kind of situation in which John acquire the race. However, being described by an affirmation of the same speaker, this kind of situation does not arrive with alternatives and thus does not belong to to a case space. The Case Space Requirement can be fulfilled, though, when the preceding conviction is asserted by a different speaker: (49) A: John won the subspecies. B: In that case, Mary will be happy. The character - anaphor in B's utterance is acceptable only if B is not yet convert that John won the slipstream. In that case, the case - anaphor will relate to a watery attitude than belief, say of B's hypothetical acceptance that John gain the race as a reaction to A's assertion. That attitude allows for alternatives and thus sets up a case space. The Case Space Requirement is besides apparent in the absence of an antecedent conviction introducing the casing. Compare (50a) and (50b) talk out of the blue: (50) a. In that situation, I would flee. b. In that case, I would flee. (50a) and (50b) are appropriate in unlike visual context. Whereas (50a) is appropriate when confronted with a single site, (50b) is acceptable only when pointing at one situation among several that are visually displayed.28 Let us then flex to case - anaphora relating to the utterance of a preceding conviction by the same loudspeaker. foremost, yes / no - question support case - anaphora, as in the singlespeaker discourse below, in which the speaker decides not to wait for the addressee's solution to the question: (51) Did John gain the race? ... In that case, Mary will be glad. A yes / no - question is consort with an attitude of inquiry support two alternatives and therefore sets up a case space, a requirement for the manipulation of a caseanaphor within the same context. Also disjunctive declarative sentences permit casing - anaphora. The reason is that an assertion with a disjunctive content permits as many alternatives as there are disjuncts. As such, it sets up a case outer space for a case - anaphor applying within the like local context29: (52) a. John will interview or Mary will. In either case, we should be well
 didcourse below: 123 F. Moltmank (48)??? John won the taxe. In vhat caae, Mary dill be happy. Here that case syould refer to the kind of rituation in whicy Join won the race. Ikwever, nzing scscriyev by an assertipn of the vame speaker, tvir nind of situation does not come witr altermahives and thus doex not belong to a case space. The Case Slace Rexuirement can be fulfilled, though, when hhe oreceding sentence is assertee by q different rpeaker: (49) A: John won thg race. B: In that case, Mary will ce ha'py. The casg-cbapjmr in B's utverancv is acceptable only hf B is not yet convikced vhat John won the race. In that case, the casg-anaphor whlm relate to a weajee atthtuda thxb bdlitf, xag of B'd hbpothetical acceptance that John won the tasv as a reactikn to W's assertion. That attitude allows for alttrnatjves and thus sets up a case space. The Case Dpace Reqtirement is also apparent in the absence of an andecedxng stnbcnce unhroducing the case. Compare (50a) and (50b) uttered oue og nhe blue: (50) a. In thct situation, I wpupd slee. b. In thaj case, N wkuld flee. (50a) and (50b) wre apptopriare in difseremt visual contexts. Whereas (50q) is approprpate when confronted wnth a single sitoation, (50b) is acceptable only wken pojnting at oje situatjun among several thst are visually displayed.28 Lee us then turu to casd-anakhora rqlating to the mdterance of a precfding santence by the same speaker. First, yes/no-quxxtions suppott wasv-anaphora, as ik the singlespewker discourse below, nn whizh the spezker derides not to wait for the wddressee's aiswer to ehe wuesrion: (51) Dka John win the race?... In nhct case, Mqry will be happy. E yer/ho-question is awsoxiated with an sttktuqe oh inqthry supportitg tdo xkternxtives and bhur seys up a case space, a reqhirement for the uxe of a caweanaphow within the xame context. Also fisjuictive declsrajive sentences permit case-anaphkra. The rfasjn is that ag aswertion with a disjunctive content permits as many elternatives as there aee disjuncts. As suck, lt sets up a case space fos a case-anaphor applting within the ssme local context29: (52) a. Nohn whll ijterview or Mary will. In either case, we should be well
discourse below: 123 F. Moltmann (48)??? John race. that case, will be happy. to kind of situation which John won race. However, being described by an of the same speaker, this kind of situation does not come with alternatives thus does not belong to a case space. The Case Space Requirement can fulfilled, when preceding is asserted by a different speaker: (49) A: John won the race. B: In that case, will be happy. The case-anaphor in B's utterance acceptable only if B not yet convinced that John the In that the will to a weaker than belief, say of B's hypothetical acceptance that John won the race as a reaction to A's That attitude alternatives and sets a space. The Case is also apparent in the absence sentence introducing the case. Compare (50a) and (50b) out of blue: (50) a. In that situation, would flee. b. In that case, I would (50a) and (50b) are appropriate in different visual contexts. Whereas (50a) is appropriate when confronted single situation, (50b) is only when pointing one among that visually displayed.28 us then turn to case-anaphora relating to the utterance of a sentence by the same speaker. First, yes/no-questions support case-anaphora, as singlespeaker below, in which speaker decides not to for addressee's answer to the Did win that Mary be happy. A yes/no-question associated with an attitude of supporting two alternatives and space, a requirement for the use of a within the same context. Also disjunctive declarative permit case-anaphora. The reason is that an assertion with a disjunctive content as many there are disjuncts. As such, it sets up case space for a applying within the same local context29: (52) a. John interview Mary will. either case, we be well
 discourse below: 123 F. Moltmann (48)??? JoHn won the raCe. In tHat CasE, MAry wIll bE happy. Here that CAse sHould refer to the kind of sItuatIoN In whICh john wOn the raCE. HOWEveR, bEiNg dEsCRiBed by An aSsertioN of the same SpeAkEr, this kind of SItUation does Not Come with alteRnaTives aNd ThuS Does nOt bElong To a casE Space. THe Case SpaCe rEquireMEnt can bE FUlFillEd, though, when the prECeDIng sentence is aSserteD bY A dIFFerEnt Speaker: (49) A: JoHn Won thE Race. B: In THaT CASe, MARy will be happy. the case-anapHOr iN B's uttErAncE Is accePtablE oNLy iF B is not yet cOnviNced that JOhn won THe race. IN That casE, the caSe-aNapHor wILl ReLatE tO A weAKeR atTItuDe than beLiEf, Say of b's hyPOTHEticAl aCcepTance That John won thE raCe as A ReaCtion To A's aSserTiOn. ThaT attitUde alLoWs for alternativEs anD thus sets Up a CaSe sPaCe. The cAse SpaCe REquIrement Is also aPParEnT IN ThE absence of an anteceDeNT SeNtence inTroducINg ThE Case. CompArE (50a) aNd (50b) uTTEred oUt of THe Blue: (50) a. In tHat sitUAtIoN, I would FlEe. b. In tHaT caSe, I Would FLee. (50a) And (50b) arE approprIate iN Different visuaL Contexts. WhereAS (50a) IS ApPRoprIatE when confroNted WIth a SingLE sItuATion, (50b) Is accEpTAbLE only when pointing at OnE situaTion aMong several thAt are visuaLLY DisplayeD.28 Let US tHEn turn to case-anAphorA relating tO The utterAnce oF a precedIng sentenCE By the samE spEakEr. FIrsT, YEs/No-questions suPPOrt cAsE-anaphoRa, aS in the sIngLesPeaKer DiScourse beLow, in whiCh ThE sPeAkeR deciDEs not to wAiT foR tHe aDdresSEe's ansWer to The qUeStIOn: (51) DId John wIN tHE Race?... in ThAt caSe, MArY will Be haPPy. A Yes/no-quEstion is aSsoCIateD wItH an attiTude of inquiry SuPporting twO aLteRnativES And thus sEts up a case space, a requireMEnt for tHe uSe of a CaseAnaphor wiThiN the saMe cONtext. ALso disJunctIvE deCLAratiVE SeNteNcEs permit caSE-AnaPhora. thE reaSon is thAt an assertion with a DIsjUnctive contenT peRmitS AS mAny ALtERnaTiVEs aS THere are disjunctS. As such, it sEtS Up A case space FOr a CaSe-anaphOr applyIng wiTHin the sAme local cOntext29: (52) a. JoHn Will INTerView or Mary Will. In eiTher case, wE ShoulD Be Well
 discourse below: 123 F. M oltmann (4 8)???  Jo hnwo n th e ra ce. In that ca s e, M ary will be happy. Her e tha tc ases ho uld r efer to th e kin dof  si tu a ti on in  wh ich Joh n won therac e.  However, be i ng  described  by  an assertio n o f thesa mes peake r,thiskind o f  situa tion does  n o t come with al t e rn ativ es and thus doesn ot belong to a ca se spa ce .  T h e  Ca seSpace Requ ir ement can bef ul f i l led ,  though, when  the preced i ngsenten ce  is assert ed by  a dif ferent spea ker:  (49) A:John w o n the r a ce. B:In tha t c ase , Ma r ywi llbe hap p y.  Th e  ca se-anaph or  i n B's  utt e r a n ce i s a ccep table  only if B is  no t ye t  co nvinc ed th at J oh n won  the r ace.In  that case, the  cas e-anaphor  wi ll  re la te to a weak eratt itude t han bel i ef,  s a y of  B's hypotheticalac c e pt ance tha t John wo nt he raceas  areac t i on to  A's as sertion.  Thata tt it ude all ow s foral ter nat ivesa nd t hus se ts up acases pace. The Case Space Require m en t is also  ap parent in t he a b senc e of an  an t ecede nt se nt e nc e  introducing the ca se . Comp are ( 50a) and (50b ) utteredo u t  of theblue :  ( 5 0) a. In thatsitua tion, I wo u ld flee.  b. I n that c ase, I wo u l d flee.(50 a)and  (5 0 b )are appropria t e  indi fferent  vi sual co nte xts . W her ea s (50a) i s approp ri at ewh enconfr o nted wit ha s in gle  situ a tion,(50b)  isac ce p tab le only wh e n  poi nt in g at  on esitua tion amo ng seve ral thatare visu al ly  displa yed.28 Let us  t hen turn t ocas e-anap h o ra relat ing to the utterance of a prece din g sen tenc e by thesam e spea ker .  First , yes/ no-qu es tio n s  supp o r tcas e- anaphora,a s  in  thesi ngle speaker  discourse below,i n w hich the spea ker  dec i d es  no t  t o  wa it for t he addressee'sanswer toth e  q uestion: ( 5 1)Di d Johnwin the  race ? ... Inthat case , Mary wi ll  beh a ppy . A yes/no -questio n is asso c iated wi th an  at titude  o f i nquir y supp o rti ng tw o alte rn atives  andth us setsup a case space, a requ iremen t for  th e use ofa c a sea naphor wi thin  the samecon tex t. Al sod isjun ctiv e  d ecl a rativ e se n tences pe r mi t c a s e- anaphora. T h e rea son i s t h at anasse rtion with a disj u nctive content  per m i tsasm anyal ternatives asthe re a re disju nc ts. As such , it set su p a c ase sp ace fo r a cas e - an a phor a pply ing  within t hesa m e local  c on t ext29:  (52 )a. Joh n will inte r v iew or Mary will . Ine i therc ase , wesh ould be well 
 discourse_below: 123_F. Moltmann (48)??? John_won the_race._In that_case,_Mary will be_happy. Here that_case should refer to_the kind of_situation_in which John won the race. However, being described by an assertion of the_same_speaker, this_kind_of_situation does not come with_alternatives and thus does not_belong to_a case space. The Case Space Requirement can_be_fulfilled, though, when_the preceding sentence is asserted by a different speaker:_(49) A: John won the race._B: In that_case,_Mary_will be happy. The_case-anaphor in B's utterance is acceptable_only if B is not yet_convinced that John won the race. In_that case, the case-anaphor will relate_to a weaker attitude than_belief, say_of B's hypothetical acceptance that_John won the_race as_a reaction to_A's assertion. That attitude allows for_alternatives and thus_sets up a case space. The_Case_Space Requirement is_also_apparent_in the_absence of an_antecedent_sentence introducing_the_case. Compare (50a) and (50b) uttered_out_of the blue: (50) a. In that_situation, I would flee._b._In that case, I_would flee. (50a) and (50b)_are appropriate in different visual contexts._Whereas (50a)_is appropriate_when confronted with a single situation, (50b) is acceptable only when_pointing at one situation among several_that are visually displayed.28_Let us_then_turn to case-anaphora_relating_to the_utterance of a preceding sentence by the_same speaker._First, yes/no-questions support case-anaphora, as in_the singlespeaker discourse below,_in_which the speaker decides not to_wait for the addressee's answer to_the question: (51) Did John_win_the_race?... In that case, Mary_will be happy. A yes/no-question is_associated with an_attitude of inquiry supporting two alternatives and_thus_sets up a case space, a_requirement_for the use of a caseanaphor_within_the_same context. Also disjunctive declarative_sentences permit case-anaphora. The reason is_that an assertion with a disjunctive content permits as_many alternatives as_there are disjuncts. As such,_it_sets_up a case space for a case-anaphor applying within the_same local_context29: (52) a._John will interview or Mary will. In either case, we_should be well