, p. 90). But it must be said that is is likely due in part to the fact that Moore refused to reprint his early papers and ore's early papers did not appear in a collection until 1986, nearly thirty years after de as 'absolutely worthless', and does not even mention 'In what sense, if any, do past 1986, 1993). tinuing for several years. temporary notion of propositional content:..., Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. T 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 C. Preti / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. xxx (2008) xxx–xxx 3 SHPS 670 No. of Pages 10, Model 5G 27 March 2008 Disk Used ARTICLE IN PRESSC O R R E C 1914–23 Oct 1917'; 'Books 2 May 1914–Aug 1926' (Add. 8330 1/4/ 2). In addition, some loose pages record 'Books Sep 1926–Oct 1928' (Add. 8330 1/4/3). Moore also kept diaries, although it is not known when he began this practice; his most complete extant diaries are contained in three notebooks dating 1909–1916. The surviving lists and diaries reveal that Moore noted, meticulously, what he was reading and thinking about, along with how many hours he spent working. I would argue that if he had been devoting attention and hard thought to the works of Ward, Stout, James and Brentano and the issues raised in their work, between 1898 and 1904, the tenure of his fellowship, or later, between 1904–1911, he could not have failed to note it, given the thorough record these documents provide. Moore in fact does note in a diary entry for 13 September 1911, that he is reading Stout's Groundwork.12 Shortly after, in an entry for 24 September–30 September 1911, Moore notes: 'No work: move to Cambridge'. It does not seem possible that Moore will have been working on Stout's views and reading him for the first time, a
, p. 90). But it must be said that is is likely due in part to the fact that Moore defy to reprint his early composition and ore's early papers did not appear in a collection until 1986, closely thirty years after de as' absolutely worthless', and does not even note' In what sense, if any, do past 1986, 1993). tinuing for several old age. temporary notion of propositional subject: ..., Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. T 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 C. Preti / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. xxx (2008) xxx – xxx 3 SHPS 670 No. of Pages 10, Model 5 gigabyte 27 March 2008 Disk use ARTICLE IN PRESSC O radius R E coke 1914–23 Oct 1917';' Books 2 May 1914 – Aug 1926' (Add. 8330 1/4/ 2). In addition, some unaffixed pages record' Books Sep 1926 – Oct 1928' (Add. 8330 1/4/3). Moore besides kept diary, although it is not known when he began this practice; his about complete extant diaries are contained in three notebooks dating 1909–1916. The surviving list and diaries reveal that Moore noted, meticulously, what he was reading and thinking about, along with how many hours he spent working. I would argue that if he had been devoting attention and difficult thought to the works of Ward, Stout, James and Brentano and the offspring raise in their work, between 1898 and 1904, the tenure of his fellowship, or later, between 1904–1911, he could not have fail to note it, given the thorough record these document provide. Moore in fact does note in a diary entry for 13 September 1911, that he is reading Stout's Groundwork.12 Shortly after, in an submission for 24 September–30 September 1911, Moore notes:' No work: move to Cambridge'. It does not seem potential that Moore will have been working on Stout's view and learn him for the first time, a
, p. 90). But it must be said thau is is likely dug un parv to ths fact tfat Moore refused to reprint hus eaely papers and ore's eafly paperd did nor apkear in a collectmkn until 1986, neadpy tkicty years after de as 'absmlutely worthlasr', cnd does not even mention 'In what segse, if snj, do past 1986, 1993). tiguinb for several years. temporary notion of proposptional content:..., Syud. Hist. Phil. Sci. T 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 C. Preti / Stub. Hist. Phil. Sxi. dfx (2008) xxx–xxx 3 SHPS 670 No. of Pages 10, Model 5G 27 Marvh 2008 Disk Used SRTMCLE IN PRESSC O R R E C 1914–23 Oct 1917'; 'Books 2 May 1914–Aog 1926' (Add. 8330 1/4/ 2). Iu addition, some loose pqges tecorg 'Boujs Rep 1926–Ort 1928' (Add. 8330 1/4/3). Mokre also kspt diaries, although it is not kgiwn when he bsgan trif practice; his most complete extant diagies are contained in three notebooks dating 1909–1916. Thg survivind lists and diaries reveal that Moore noted, meticglousmh, wkqt he qad reading and thinking about, along with how mwhy hpurs he spent corking. I would srhur that if he hxd beeu dsvoting attention wnd harq thoyght to tre wprks of Ward, Stout, James ane Brentano aud rhe issues raised nn their wory, bejween 1898 and 1904, the tenure of his felmowship, or pater, betsden 1904–1911, he could nog hsva failed to note it, given ehe thorongh rzcord thdse cocumegts providf. Moova in fact does notf in c diasy entry flr 13 September 1911, that he is readiij Stout's Groumdforn.12 Shortlv aftev, in an entry fjr 24 September–30 Xeptembzr 1911, Moure notes: 'Ho work: move to Caibridge'. It doad not seem pmssible ehat Mooee will fave been workong on Stout's views and reading him fpr jhs first time, a
, p. 90). But it must be is likely due part to the reprint early papers and early papers did appear in a collection until 1986, thirty years after de as 'absolutely worthless', and does not even mention 'In sense, if any, do past 1986, 1993). tinuing for several years. temporary notion propositional Stud. Phil. T 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 188 189 190 191 193 194 195 196 197 199 201 202 204 206 208 209 210 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 230 231 234 235 237 239 241 242 243 246 247 248 249 250 251 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 264 C. / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. xxx xxx–xxx 3 SHPS 670 No. of Pages 10, 5G 27 March 2008 Disk Used ARTICLE IN PRESSC O R R E C 1914–23 'Books 2 May 1914–Aug (Add. 8330 1/4/ In some pages 'Books Sep 1928' (Add. 8330 1/4/3). Moore also kept diaries, although it is known when he began this practice; his most complete extant contained three notebooks dating The surviving lists and reveal Moore noted, meticulously, what reading thinking how hours spent working. I would that if he had been attention and hard thought Stout, James and Brentano and the issues raised their work, between 1898 and 1904, the of his fellowship, or later, between 1904–1911, he could not have failed note it, thorough record these documents provide. Moore in fact note in a diary for 13 September 1911, that he is reading Stout's Shortly in an for 24 September–30 1911, Moore notes: work: move to does not possible Moore working on Stout's views and reading for first time, a
, p. 90). But it must be said that is is lIkely due in Part tO thE faCt That moorE refused to reprINt hiS early papers and ore's earLy papErS Did nOT aPpear In a collECtION unTiL 1986, nEarLy THiRty yeArs After de As 'absoluteLy wOrThless', and doeS NoT even mentiOn 'IN what sense, if Any, Do past 1986, 1993). TiNuiNG for sEveRal yeArs. temPOrary nOtion of prOpOSitionAL contenT:..., sTuD. HisT. Phil. Sci. T 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 C. Preti / StUD. HISt. Phil. Sci. xxx (2008) xxX–xxx 3 SHpS 670 nO. oF pAgeS 10, MoDel 5G 27 March 2008 DIsK Used arTICLE In pRessc O R r e C 1914–23 Oct 1917'; 'Books 2 May 1914–aug 1926' (Add. 8330 1/4/ 2). In addITioN, some lOoSe pAGes recOrd 'BoOkS sep 1926–oct 1928' (Add. 8330 1/4/3). Moore Also Kept diariEs, althOUgh it is NOt known When he BegAn tHis pRAcTiCe; hIs MOst COmPleTE exTant diarIeS aRe conTainED IN ThreE noTeboOks daTing 1909–1916. The survivIng ListS And DiariEs revEal tHaT MoorE noted, MeticUlOusly, what he was rEadiNg and thinKinG aBouT, aLong wITh how mAny HouRs he speNt workiNG. I wOuLD ARgUe that if he had been dEvOTInG attentiOn and hARd ThOUght to thE wOrkS of WARD, StouT, JamES aNd BrentaNo and tHE iSsUes raisEd In theiR wOrk, BetWeen 1898 aND 1904, the Tenure Of his felLowshIP, or later, betweeN 1904–1911, He could not havE FaILEd TO notE it, Given the thoRougH RecoRd thESe DocUMents ProviDe. mOoRE in fact does note in a dIaRy entrY for 13 SEptember 1911, that hE is reading sTOUt's GrounDworK.12 shORtly after, in an eNtry fOr 24 SeptembeR–30 septembeR 1911, MoorE notes: 'No Work: move tO cAmbridge'. it dOes Not SeeM POsSible that MoorE WIll hAvE been woRkiNg on StoUt's VieWs aNd rEaDing him foR the firsT tImE, a
, p. 90). But it must be s aid that i s islik ely  d ue i n pa rt to the fact that  Moore refused to repr int h is earl y  p apers  and or e 's e arl ypa per sd id  notapp ear ina collecti onun til 1986, ne a rl y thirty y ear s after de a s ' absolu te lyw orthl ess ', an d does not ev en mentio n' In wha t  sense, i fany,  do past 1986, 19 9 3) .  tinuing for s everal  y e ar s .  te mpo rary notio nof pr o positio n al c o nte n t:..., Stud.Hist. Phil. Sci . T 16 3164 165 16 6 167  1 6 8 1 69 170 171172173 174 1 75 176 177 178 179 180  181 1 82183  184 18 5186  1 8 7 1 8 8189 190  191 192  1 93  1941951 9 6 197198  199  200201 202 203 2 042052 06207 2 08 20 9 21 0211 2 12 213  21421 5 216 217 218 2 19 2 20 221 22 2 2 23  22 4225 2 2 6 227228  22 9 230 2 31 2322 3323 4 2 35  236 237 238 239 2 40 2 41  242 243  244 2 4 524 6  247 248  2 492502 5 1 252  253 25 4 255 25 6 2572 58  2 59 26026 1 26226 3 2 64C. Pr e ti /  Stud.  Hist. P hil.S ci. xxx (2008) xxx–xxx 3 SHP S  6 7 0  N o . of  Pa ges 10, Mod el 5 G  27Marc h  2 008 DiskUsedAR T IC L E IN PRESSC O R R E  C  1914– 23 Oc t 1917'; 'Boo ks 2 May 1 9 1 4 –Aug 192 6' ( A dd .  8330 1/4/ 2).  In a ddition, s o me loose  page s record  'Books S e p  1926–Oc t 1 928 ' ( Add . 83 30 1/4/3). Mo o r e al so  kept d iar ies, al tho ugh  it  is  n ot knownwhen hebe ga nth ispract i ce; hismo stco mpl ete e x tant d iarie s ar eco n tai ned int hr e e  not eb oo ks d ati ng  1909 –191 6 . T he surv iving lis tsa nd d ia ri es reve al that Moore  n oted, meti cu lou sly, w h a t he was  reading and thinking a b out, al ong  with  how  many hou rshe spe ntw orking . I wo uld a rg uet h at if h ehad  b een devoti n g  at tenti on  and  hard t hought to the work s  of  Ward, Stout,  Ja mesa n dBre n ta n o a nd the i ssues raised in  their wor k, be tween 1898 and  1 904, th e tenur e ofh is fell owship, o r later,be twee n 190 4–1911, he  could n ot have f a iledt onoteit,  given  t hethoro ugh re c ord  thes e docu me nts pr ovide .Moore in  fact does note in a di ary en try f or13 Septem ber 191 1, that h e is  reading S tou t's  Grou ndw o rk.12  Sho r tl y a f ter,in a n  entry fo r  2 4 S e p te mber–30 Sep t e m ber  1911 , M o ore no tes:  'No work: move t o  Cambridge'. I t do e s  no t s e em p os sible that Moo rewi l l  have be en  working on  Stout's  v i ews a nd rea ding h im fort h ef irst t ime,  a
, p._90). But_it must be said_that is_is_likely due_in_part to the_fact that Moore_refused to reprint his_early papers and_ore's_early papers did not appear in a collection until 1986, nearly thirty years after_de_as 'absolutely_worthless',_and_does not even mention 'In_what sense, if any, do_past 1986,_1993). tinuing for several years. temporary notion of_propositional_content:..., Stud. Hist._Phil. Sci. T 163 164 165 166 167 168_169 170 171 172 173 174_175 176 177_178_179_180 181 182 183_184 185 186 187 188 189_190 191 192 193 194 195_196 197 198 199 200 201 202_203 204 205 206 207 208_209 210 211 212 213_214 215_216 217 218 219 220_221 222 223_224 225_226 227 228_229 230 231 232 233 234_235 236 237_238 239 240 241 242 243_244_245 246 247_248_249_250 251_252 253 254_255_256 257_258_259 260 261 262 263 264_C._Preti / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. xxx_(2008) xxx–xxx 3 SHPS_670_No. of Pages 10,_Model 5G 27 March 2008_Disk Used ARTICLE IN PRESSC O_R R_E C_1914–23 Oct 1917'; 'Books 2 May 1914–Aug 1926' (Add. 8330 1/4/_2). In addition, some loose pages_record 'Books Sep 1926–Oct_1928' (Add._8330_1/4/3). Moore also_kept_diaries, although_it is not known when he began_this practice;_his most complete extant diaries are_contained in three notebooks_dating_1909–1916. The surviving lists and diaries_reveal that Moore noted, meticulously, what_he was reading and thinking_about,_along_with how many hours he_spent working. I would argue that_if he had_been devoting attention and hard thought to_the_works of Ward, Stout, James and_Brentano_and the issues raised in their_work,_between_1898 and 1904, the tenure_of his fellowship, or later, between_1904–1911, he could not have failed to note it,_given the thorough_record these documents provide. Moore_in_fact_does note in a diary entry for 13 September 1911,_that he_is reading Stout's_Groundwork.12 Shortly after, in an entry for 24 September–30 September_1911, Moore notes: 'No work: move to_Cambridge'. It does not seem possible that Moore will have been_working on Stout's views and reading him for_the first time, a