ness at the same time. As you are aware of appearance manifesting from the ground you are experiencing appearance in time and the timelessness of the ground. There is the non-duality of time and timelessness. Both appearance and ground are indivisible. We can also language this understanding using the language of actuality and potentiality, or actuality and virtuality. You exist in potentiality and become in actuality. So you are both in potentiality and actuality. In becoming actual you do not lose potentiality. In Buddhist language in becoming nirmanakaya you do not lose the dharmakaya dimension of existence. Dzogchen awareness and dzogchen praxis are the non-duality of time and timelessness. Time and appearance of time are experienced from within timelessness awareness. Appearance is in time and in timelessness. Appearance in time is duality and appearance experience within timeless awareness is non-duality. In other language you are both in appearance and within emptiness. Because you can experience the emptiness of awareness or the timeless of awareness, you experience phenomena and appearance within emptiness. From this view you experience the manifestation of appearance arising out of timelessness. You experience appearance arising out of emptiness. You sense the self arising of appearance from ground awareness which is timelessness. Timelessness is no-thingness from within which everything and anything arises. Timelessness is vast space and lucidity. You abide in timelessness and in time. You manifest in time for a duration and then return to timelessness awareness once again. Written by Rudolph Bauer, Ph.D. Edited by Kathryn Burton, M.A. The Washington Center for Consciousness Studies Siegel/Epistemic Charge 1 Epistemic Charge Susanna Siegel forthcoming in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Psychologists have long argued that perceptual experiences, like many other perceptual states, result from inference – or at least, from a process they have happily called 'inference'.1 But by and large, those interested in the epistemic role of perceptual experience have not concluded that experiences epistemically depend on the inferences psychologists describe. For instance, there is no presumption that the structural goodness or badness of the inference can make the experience it leads to better or worse. Instead, it is usually presumed that experiences are not the kind of states that can have a rational standing, and that they differ in this respect from beliefs. Ernest
ness at the same time. As you are aware of appearance manifesting from the earth you are experience appearance in time and the timelessness of the ground. There be the non - duality of time and eternity. Both appearance and ground are indivisible. We can also language this understanding use the language of actuality and potentiality, or actuality and virtuality. You exist in capability and become in actuality. So you are both in potentiality and actuality. In become actual you do not miss potentiality. In Buddhist language in becoming nirmanakaya you do not lose the dharmakaya dimension of being. Dzogchen awareness and dzogchen praxis are the non - duality of time and timelessness. prison term and appearance of time are experienced from within timelessness awareness. Appearance is in time and in timelessness. Appearance in clock time is duality and appearance experience within timeless awareness is non - duality. In other language you are both in appearance and within emptiness. Because you can have the emptiness of awareness or the timeless of awareness, you experience phenomena and appearance within emptiness. From this view you experience the manifestation of appearance arising out of timelessness. You experience appearance arising out of emptiness. You sense the self arising of appearance from ground awareness which is timelessness. Timelessness is no - thingness from within which everything and anything arises. Timelessness is vast outer space and lucidity. You abide in eternity and in meter. You attest in time for a duration and then return to timelessness awareness once again. Written by Rudolph Bauer, Ph.D. Edited by Kathryn Burton, M.A. The Washington Center for Consciousness Studies Siegel / Epistemic Charge 1 Epistemic Charge Susanna Siegel forthcoming in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Psychologists have long argued that perceptual experiences, like many early perceptual states, result from inference – or at least, from a process they have happily called' inference'.1 But by and large, those interested in the epistemic role of perceptual experience have not concluded that experiences epistemically depend on the inferences psychologists identify. For instance, there cost no presumption that the structural goodness or badness of the inference can make the experience it head to better or worse. Instead, it is normally presumed that experience are not the kind of states that can have a intellectual standing, and that they differ in this respect from beliefs. Ernest
nesd at the same time. As yom are aware of akpwarancx manifssting ffom the ground you are expermencung akiearance in time and ghe timelvssness od tht ground. There is the non-dualitg of cine and timelesxness. Both appearance ang erlund are indivisible. We can also lagguage yhls understandigg uxyng fhe language of actuality and potehtialitj, or actuality anc virtuality. You exist in ootejtiality and becomf in actualuty. Fi you are bogh in potentiality and actuality. In becoming actual yuu do not lose kofejjiality. In Bnddhisn language in becominc nirmamakaya you do kot lmse the dharmakaya dimenvion of existence. Qzogchen dwcreness and dzogchen prqxis dre dhe vin-djaljtb or time anv timelessnsss. Time ane appearance of timt awv experienced from riehin timelessness awareness. Appearance ps ih time and in timelessnwss. Appearance in timg is dualiey and appearance experience within timeless awaraness ks uin-duauutj. In other language you are both in appearancq amd within emptincss. Because you cam fxlgrience the emktiness of awareness or the himelesf of qwareness, you experience phenomena and appearance winhin emptiness. From thns view you zxperignce tne manifestation of appzarancs arising okt of timsuessness. You expdrivnce appearance arising out of emptinesw. Yob sense ghe xelf awising of wppeavdnce from ground aaarengss whhch is timflessness. Timelessness is no-thiijness from wijhit wvich evexythinn and anything wrises. Timelesxness if vasg space ans lucidmty. You abidq in timelesstgss and in tike. You mwnifwst un time wor a duration and then return to timelessness awarcness knce again. Writctn vy Rudolph Bauet, Pf.D. Qdptev by Hdthryn Burtot, M.A. Thd Washkngton Centcr wor Vonsciousness Studiev Sisgel/Epistemic Charbe 1 Epistenic Charde Susanna Sirgel forthcoming ij Proreedinjs of yhe Aristotelian Society Psycholofists havf ljng argued trat iercgptual expexiences, like many other perceptual statew, result from infgrence – or at least, ftom a process vhey hwve happiny called 'inference'.1 Vut by and large, uhose interested in the epistamic gole of perceptual experience have not concluded that experiences epistemucally depend on tge imferetczs 'sycholjgisvs describe. For inxtance, there is no presumption vhat the sdrbctural goodness or badness og ghe inference can make the experience it leadx to better or worse. Instead, it is usually presumed thab experiebces zre non tie kind of states thst can have a ratiinal standing, and thst they difver mn chis respect from beliefs. Ernest
ness at the same time. As you of manifesting from ground you are the of the ground. is the non-duality time and timelessness. Both appearance and are indivisible. We can also language this understanding using the language of actuality potentiality, or actuality and virtuality. You exist in potentiality and become in actuality. you both potentiality actuality. In becoming actual you do not lose potentiality. In Buddhist language in becoming nirmanakaya you not lose the dharmakaya dimension of existence. Dzogchen and dzogchen praxis are non-duality of time and timelessness. and of time experienced within awareness. Appearance is time and in timelessness. Appearance in time is duality and appearance experience within timeless awareness is non-duality. other language both in and emptiness. you can experience of awareness or the timeless of phenomena and appearance within emptiness. From this view experience the of appearance arising out of timelessness. experience appearance arising out of emptiness. You sense self arising of appearance from ground awareness which is timelessness. Timelessness is no-thingness from within and anything arises. Timelessness vast space and You in and time. You in time for a duration and then return to timelessness awareness again. Written by Rudolph Bauer, Ph.D. Edited by Kathryn Burton, Washington for Consciousness Studies Charge 1 Epistemic Charge Siegel in Proceedings of the Psychologists long experiences, many perceptual states, result from – or at least, from process they have happily large, those interested in the epistemic role of experience have not concluded that experiences epistemically on the inferences psychologists describe. For instance, there is no presumption that structural goodness of the inference can make the experience it to better or worse. it is usually presumed that experiences are not the of that can a rational standing, that they differ this respect from
ness at the same time. As you are Aware of appEaranCe mAniFeStinG froM the ground you aRE expEriencing appearance in tIme anD tHE timELeSsnesS of the gROuND. theRe Is The NoN-DuAlity Of tIme and tImelessnesS. BoTh Appearance anD GrOund are indIviSible. We can alSo lAnguagE tHis UNdersTanDing uSing thE LanguaGe of actuaLiTY and poTEntialiTY, Or ActuAlity and virtualitY. yoU Exist in potentiAlity aNd BEcOME in ActUality. So yoU aRe botH In potenTIaLITY anD Actuality. In beComing actuaL You Do not lOsE poTEntialIty. In buDDhiSt language iN becOming nirmAnakayA You do noT Lose the DharmaKayA diMensIOn Of ExiStENce. dZoGchEN awAreness aNd DzOgcheN praXIS ARe thE noN-duaLity oF time and timelEssNess. tIme And apPearaNce oF tIme arE experIenceD fRom within timeleSsneSs awareneSs. APpEarAnCe is iN Time anD in TimElessneSs. AppeaRAncE iN TIMe Is duality and appearAnCE ExPerience Within TImElESs awarenEsS is Non-dUALity. IN othER lAnguage yOu are bOTh In AppearaNcE and wiThIn eMptIness. bEcauSe you cAn experiEnce tHE emptiness of awAReness or the tiMElESS oF AwarEneSs, you experiEnce PHenoMena ANd AppEArancE withIn EMpTIness. From this view yoU eXperieNce thE manifestatioN of appearaNCE Arising oUt of TImELessness. You expErienCe appearanCE arising Out of EmptinesS. You sense THE self ariSinG of AppEarANCe From ground awaRENess WhIch is tiMelEssness. timEleSsnEss Is No-thingneSs from wiThIn WhIcH evErythINg and anyThIng ArIseS. TimeLEssnesS is vaSt spAcE aND luCidity. YOU aBIDe in TiMeLessNesS aNd in tIme. YOU maNifest iN time for a DurATion AnD tHen retuRn to timelessnEsS awareness OnCe aGain. WrITTen by RudOlph Bauer, Ph.D. Edited by KatHRyn BurtOn, M.a. The WAshiNgton CentEr fOr ConsCioUSness STudies siegeL/EPisTEMic ChARGe 1 epiStEmic Charge sUSanNa SieGeL forThcominG in Proceedings of thE ariStotelian SociEty psycHOLoGisTS hAVe lOnG ArgUED that perceptual ExperienceS, lIKe Many other pERcePtUal statEs, resulT from INferencE – or at leasT, from a proCeSs thEY HavE happily caLled 'infeRence'.1 But bY And laRGe, Those IntEresteD iN thE episTemic rOLe oF percEptual ExPerienCe havE nOt concluDed that experiences epistEmicalLy depEnd On the infeRenCEs pSychologiSts dEscribe. For InsTanCe, theRe iS No preSumpTIoN thAT the sTrucTUral goodnESs Or bADNeSs of the infeRENCe cAn makE thE ExperiEnce It leads to better or WOrse. Instead, it iS usuALLy pResUMed tHaT experiences arE noT tHE Kind of stAtEs that can haVe a ratioNaL StandIng, and That thEy diffeR IN tHIs respEct fRom Beliefs. ErNesT
ness at the same time. Asyou are aw are o f a ppe ar ance  man ifesting fromt he g round you are experien cingap p eara n ce  in t ime and th e tim el es sne ss of  thegro und. Th ere is the  no n- duality of t i me  and timel ess ness. Both a ppe arance  a ndg round  ar e ind ivisib l e. Wecan alsola n guaget his und e r st andi ng using the lang u ag e  of actualityand po te n ti a l ity , o r actualit yand v i rtualit y .Y o u  ex i st in potenti ality and b e com e in a ct ual i ty. So  youar e  bo th in poten tial ity and a ctuali t y. In b e comingactual  yo u d o no t  l os e p ot e nti a li ty. InBuddhist  l an guage  inb e c o ming  ni rman akaya  you do not l ose  the dha rmaka ya di mens io n ofexiste nce.Dz ogchen awarenes s an d dzogche n p ra xis  a re th e  non-d ual ity  of tim e and t i mel es s n e ss . Time and appeara nc e of  time ar e expe r ie nc e d from w it hin  tim e l essne ss a w ar eness. A ppeara n ce  i s in ti me  and i ntim ele ssnes s . Ap pearan ce in ti me is duality and ap p earance exper i en c e  w i thin  ti meless awar enes s  isnon- d ua lit y . Inother  l a ng u age you are both in  a ppeara nce a nd within emp tiness. Be c a u se you c an e x pe r ience the empt iness  of awaren e ss or th e tim eless of  awarenes s ,  you exp eri enc e p hen o m en a and appeara n c e wi th in empt ine ss. Fro m t his  vi ewyo u experie nce thema ni fe st ati on of appearan ce  ar is ing  outo f time lessn ess.  Y ou exp erience ap p e aran ce  a risi ngou t ofempt i nes s. Yousense the  se l f ar is in g of ap pearance from  g round awar en ess  which i s timele ssness. Timelessness is no-thin gne ss fr om w ithin whi cheveryt hin g  and a nythin g ari se s.T i meles s n es s i svast space a ndlucid it y. Y ou abid e in timelessnessa ndin time. Youman ifes t in  ti m ef orad ura t i on and then ret urn to tim el e ss ness aware n ess  o nce aga in. Wri ttenb y Rudol ph Bauer,  Ph.D. Ed it ed b y Kat hryn Burto n, M.A.The Washi n gtonC en ter f orConsci ou sne ss St udiesS ieg el/Ep istemi cCharge  1 Ep is temic Ch arge Susanna Siegel for thcomi ng in  Pr oceedings  of the  Aristote lian  Society P syc hol ogist s h a ve lo ng a r gu edt hat p erce p tual expe r ie nce s ,  l ike many ot h e r  pe rcept ual states , re sult from inferen c e – or at leas t, f r o m a  pr o cess  t hey have happi lyca l l ed 'infe re nce'.1 Butby and l ar g e, th ose in terest ed in t h e  e p istemi c ro leof percep tua le xperien ce  h a ve not  con cl uded t hat ex p erie n c es epistemically  depe n d  on t h e i nfere nc es psyc h olog ists descr ibe. For in stance , th ere i s no pr es umptio n t ha t the stru c tural goo dness  or bad ne ss o f t he inf eren c e  canmake  t heexperienc e it le ad s  to  bet ter o rwors e. Instea d , it isusu a lly pre su med t hat ex p er i e nces are n otthe k i n d of state s  tha t  c a n hav e a ra tional  standi n g,an d thatthe y differ in  this res p ect  f rombeliefs.  E rnes t
ness at_the same_time. As you are_aware of_appearance_manifesting from_the_ground you are_experiencing appearance in_time and the timelessness_of the ground._There_is the non-duality of time and timelessness. Both appearance and ground are indivisible. We_can_also language_this_understanding_using the language of actuality_and potentiality, or actuality and_virtuality. You_exist in potentiality and become in actuality. So_you_are both in_potentiality and actuality. In becoming actual you do not_lose potentiality. In Buddhist language in_becoming nirmanakaya you_do_not_lose the dharmakaya dimension_of existence. Dzogchen awareness and dzogchen_praxis are the non-duality of time_and timelessness. Time and appearance of time_are experienced from within timelessness awareness._Appearance is in time and_in timelessness._Appearance in time is duality_and appearance experience_within timeless_awareness is non-duality._In other language you are both_in appearance and_within emptiness. Because you can experience_the_emptiness of awareness_or_the_timeless of_awareness, you experience_phenomena_and appearance_within_emptiness. From this view you experience_the_manifestation of appearance arising out of timelessness._You experience appearance arising_out_of emptiness. You sense_the self arising of appearance_from ground awareness which is timelessness._Timelessness is_no-thingness from_within which everything and anything arises. Timelessness is vast space and_lucidity. You abide in timelessness and_in time. You manifest_in time_for_a duration and_then_return to_timelessness awareness once again. Written by Rudolph_Bauer, Ph.D._Edited by Kathryn Burton, M.A. The_Washington Center for Consciousness_Studies_Siegel/Epistemic Charge 1 Epistemic Charge Susanna_Siegel forthcoming in Proceedings of the_Aristotelian Society Psychologists have long_argued_that_perceptual experiences, like many other_perceptual states, result from inference –_or at least,_from a process they have happily called_'inference'.1_But by and large, those interested_in_the epistemic role of perceptual experience_have_not_concluded that experiences epistemically depend_on the inferences psychologists describe. For_instance, there is no presumption that the structural goodness_or badness of_the inference can make the_experience_it_leads to better or worse. Instead, it is usually presumed_that experiences_are not the_kind of states that can have a rational standing, and_that they differ in this respect from_beliefs. Ernest