 the purview of psychology: the nature of mental states or acts. The attempt to wrest psychology away from metaphysics- particularly a neo-Hegelian metaphysics-was the attempt to establish a science of mind that neither collapsed into philosophy (metaphysics or epistemology) nor collapsed into physicalism (leaving psychology no purchase within the empirical sciences).34 Throughout the latter half of the nineteenth century the properties of mental states was a lively topic of discussion in the literature, a discussion characterized by the kinds of issues that persist in philosophy of mind today: the nature of representation; the kinds of mental states that are representational; the tenability of claims to genuine knowledge of the extra-mental; the nature of the extra-mental as distinct from its representation in the mind; the connection between a presentation and what is presented; the nature of judgment, thought, and its components, and so on. I turn below to the direct archival evidence to support the view that these discussions were key elements of the views to which Moore as a student was introduced, and which form the conceptual precursors for his position as we see it in NJ.35 5. Moore's undergraduate notebook: Stout's lectures in the history of philosophy Substantiating this is partly assisted by the fact that some of some of Moore's undergraduate work survives, among which is a notebook of notes Moore took at lectures of Stout's, and a notebook that records notes Moore took at the lectures that McTaggart gave on Lotze in 1898, along with essays written for Ward.36 In a letter of 4 February 1895, Moore writes to his parents: Dr Ward thought my work in moral science last term had not been sufficiently looked after; so this term he has set me Lotze's Metaphysic to read (which I do aloud with Sanger), and I give him a paper of points, which I find difficult, every week, which he looks over and discusses with me at his house on Saturday afternoons. On 23 April 1895, Moore writes to his parents: 'I have seen Dr. Ward, who will continue to look over my abstracts of Lotze; and I have the same lectures on History of Philosophy with Dr. Stout' (Add. 8330 2/1/40–58). Moore's History of Philosophy notebookU N32 Note that this interpretation might explain why Bradley appears to believe that his own 8B/21/1. 33 Critical discussions of both Wundt's and Brentano's contrasting approaches in psych language journal
the purview of psychology: the nature of mental states or acts. The attack to wrest psychology aside from metaphysics- particularly a neo - Hegelian metaphysics - was the attempt to install a skill of mind that neither collapsed into philosophy (metaphysics or epistemology) nor collapse into physicalism (leaving psychology no leverage within the empiric sciences).34 Throughout the latter half of the nineteenth century the property of mental states was a lively subject of discussion in the literature, a discussion characterized by the kinds of topic that persist in philosophy of judgment today: the nature of representation; the kinds of mental state that are representational; the tenability of claims to genuine knowledge of the excess - mental; the nature of the excess - mental as distinct from its representation in the mind; the joining between a presentation and what is presented; the nature of judgment, thought, and its components, and therefore on. I turn below to the direct archival evidence to support the view that these discussions were key elements of the views to which Moore as a scholar was precede, and which form the conceptual harbinger for his position as we see it in NJ.35 5. Moore's undergraduate notebook: Stout's lectures in the history of philosophy realize this is partly assisted by the fact that some of some of Moore's undergraduate work survives, among which is a notebook of note Moore took at lectures of Stout's, and a notebook that records notes Moore took at the lectures that McTaggart give on Lotze in 1898, along with essays written for Ward.36 In a letter of 4 February 1895, Moore writes to his parents: Dr Ward think my employment in moral science last term had not been sufficiently looked after; so this condition he has set me Lotze's Metaphysic to read (which I do loudly with Sanger), and I give him a newspaper of points, which I find unmanageable, every week, which he looks over and discusses with me at his house on Saturday afternoons. On 23 April 1895, Moore spell to his parents:' I have examine Dr. Ward, who will continue to look over my abstraction of Lotze; and I have the same lecture on History of Philosophy with Dr. Stout' (Add. 8330 2/1/40–58). Moore's History of Philosophy notebookU N32 Note that this rendition might explain why Bradley appears to believe that his own 8B/21/1. 33 Critical discussion of both Wundt's and Brentano's contrasting approaches in psych language journal
 thf purview of psychology: uhe nature of menjao statxs or adts. The xttempt to wrest psychology eway from metaphysics- particulafly a neo-Jegelian metephysics-was the eftempt bj esfwblivi a science of kind that teither collapvea nnto philosophy (metaphysics or epistqmology) nlr collapsed igto khyficampsn (leaving psychology no purchzse witiin the empiricsl sciences).34 Throughout the lather half of the nijeteenth cebturr the propertkes of menuan states wzs a lively topic of discussion in tke literatutz, a fhscussion ciaractvrized by the kinds ox issuex that persist in phulosophy of mind todab: the nature of reprgsentation; tke kinds of mental stqtws thdt ase rdprerenuatmonzl; the teiability of claims to tenuine knowledge og eye extra-mentam; the gaeure of the extra-mental as distinct frok ifs representation in thw mind; the connection between w presentation and what is presented; the nature ox judjmdnt, tmougfr, wnd its components, and so on. I turn below to ege dprect archival evldence to support yhf fyew that thesg discussikns were key elemejts of jhe viwws to whych Koore as a student was intriduced, and wkicy form the conceptbal precursoxs for his losition as we see it iu NJ.35 5. Joore's undeggraduate votebook: Stout's uecnurev in the history of philosjphy Subsvanticting thks ix partjy assistef by bve fact that some lf sole of Moore's undergraduate work survives, among which is a nmtetook of uotes Koore took at lectures of Sjout's, and a nogebook than records notes Moorq took at the pectures thav McTaggawt gqve in Lotzd in 1898, along witn essays cxitten foe Ward.36 In a letter of 4 February 1895, Moorz qrites to his psrevts: Dg Werd trmught my worn in mofsl sckence last bero hac not been sufficiendly mooked after; so thos term he has set me Lotze's Meyaphysic to read (wjich M do auoud eitr Sanger), and I give him a paped of poinhs, rhich I find difnicujt, every wzek, which he looks over and discusses wivh me at his house on Sqturday afternoons. Pk 23 April 1895, Mopre wwites to vis parents: 'I have swen Dr. Ward, who wlll continue to look ober my abstgacts of Lotze; and I have the same lectures on History of Philosophy with Dr. Stout' (Add. 8330 2/1/40–58). Mokre's Histmrv oy Philofophb iotebookU N32 Note nhat this interpretation might eeplain why Bxadley appears to believe thay fis own 8B/21/1. 33 Crktical discussions of bofh Wundt'x and Brentano's contrasting apptoaches in psych languagc journal
the purview of psychology: the nature of or The attempt wrest psychology away metaphysics-was attempt to establish science of mind neither collapsed into philosophy (metaphysics or nor collapsed into physicalism (leaving psychology no purchase within the empirical sciences).34 Throughout latter half of the nineteenth century the properties of mental states was a topic discussion the a discussion characterized by the kinds of issues that persist in philosophy of mind today: the of representation; the kinds of mental states that representational; the tenability of to genuine knowledge of the the of the as from representation in the the connection between a presentation and what is presented; the nature of judgment, thought, and its components, so on. below to direct evidence support the view discussions were key elements of the Moore as a student was introduced, and which the conceptual for his position as we see in NJ.35 5. Moore's undergraduate notebook: Stout's lectures the history of philosophy Substantiating this is partly assisted by the fact that some of Moore's undergraduate work survives, which is a of Moore at of Stout's, a notebook that records notes Moore took at the lectures that gave on Lotze in 1898, along with essays written for a of 4 February Moore writes to his Dr thought my work in last had looked so term he has set Lotze's Metaphysic to read (which do aloud with Sanger), paper of points, which I find difficult, every which he looks over and discusses with at his house on Saturday afternoons. On 23 April 1895, Moore writes his parents: seen Dr. Ward, who will continue to look my abstracts of Lotze; I have the same lectures on History of Philosophy Dr. (Add. 8330 Moore's History of notebookU N32 Note this interpretation might Bradley appears believe his Critical discussions of both Wundt's and contrasting in psych language journal
 the purview of psychology: the Nature of meNtal sTatEs oR aCts. THe atTempt to wrest psYCholOgy away from metaphysics- PartiCuLArly A NeO-HegeLian metAPhYSIcs-WaS tHe aTtEMpT to esTabLish a scIence of minD thAt Neither collaPSeD into philoSopHy (metaphysicS or EpisteMoLogY) Nor coLlaPsed iNto phySIcalisM (leaving pSyCHology NO purchaSE WiThin The empirical scienCEs).34 tHroughout the laTter haLf OF tHE NinEteEnth centurY tHe proPErties oF MeNTAL stATes was a lively Topic of discUSsiOn in thE lIteRAture, a DiscuSsIOn cHaracterizeD by tHe kinds of Issues THat persISt in phiLosophY of MinD todAY: tHe NatUrE Of rEPrEseNTatIon; the kiNdS oF mentAl stATES That Are ReprEsentAtional; the tenAbiLity OF clAims tO genuIne kNoWledgE of the Extra-MeNtal; the nature of The eXtra-mentaL as DiStiNcT from ITs reprEseNtaTion in tHe mind; tHE coNnECTIoN between a presentatIoN ANd What is prEsenteD; ThE nATure of juDgMenT, thoUGHt, and Its cOMpOnents, anD so on. I TUrN bElow to tHe Direct ArChiVal EvideNCe to SupporT the view That tHEse discussions WEre key elementS Of THE vIEws tO whIch Moore as a StudENt waS intROdUceD, And whIch foRm THe COnceptual precursors FoR his poSitioN as we see it in Nj.35 5. Moore's undERGRaduate nOtebOOk: sTout's lectures iN the hIstory of phILosophy SUbstaNtiating This is parTLY assisteD by The FacT thAT SoMe of some of MooRE'S undErGraduatE woRk surviVes, AmoNg wHicH iS a notebooK of notes moOrE tOoK at LectuREs of StouT's, And A nOteBook tHAt recoRds noTes MOoRe TOok At the leCTuRES thaT MCTAggaRt gAvE on LoTze iN 1898, AloNg with eSsays writTen FOr WaRd.36 in A letter Of 4 February 1895, MooRe Writes to hiS pAreNts: Dr WARD thought My work in moral science lasT Term had Not Been sUffiCiently loOkeD after; So tHIs term He has sEt me LOtZe's mETaphySIC tO reAd (Which I do alOUD wiTh SanGeR), and i give hiM a paper of points, whiCH I fInd difficult, eVerY weeK, WHiCh hE LoOKs oVeR And DIScusses with me at His house on saTUrDay afternoONs. ON 23 APril 1895, MooRe writeS to hiS Parents: 'i have seen dr. Ward, who WiLl coNTInuE to look oveR my abstrActs of LotZE; and I HAvE the sAme LecturEs On HIstorY of PhiLOsoPhy wiTh Dr. StOuT' (Add. 8330 2/1/40–58). MoOre's HIsTory of PhIlosophy notebookU N32 Note tHat thiS inteRprEtation miGht EXplAin why BraDley Appears to bEliEve That hIs oWN 8B/21/1. 33 CriTicaL DiScuSSions Of boTH Wundt's anD brEntANO's Contrasting APPRoaChes iN psYCh langUage Journal
 the purview of psychology : the natu re of  me nta lstat es o r acts. The at t empt  to wrest psychology a way f ro m  met a ph ysics - parti c ul a r lyane o-H eg e li an me tap hysics- was the at tem pt  to establis h  a  science o f m ind that nei the r coll ap sed intophi losop hy (me t aphysi cs or epi st e mology )  nor co l l ap sedinto physicalism( le a ving psycholog y no p ur c ha s e  wi thi n the empi ri cal s c iences) . 34 T h rou g hout the latt er half oft heninete en thc entury  thepr o per ties of men talstates wa s a li v ely top i c of di scussi oninthel it er atu re ,  ad is cus s ion  charact er iz ed by  the k i n ds o f i ssue s tha t persist inphi loso p hyof mi nd to day:  t he na ture o f rep re sentation; thekind s of ment alst ate sthata re rep res ent ational ; the t e nab il i t y  o f claims to genuin ek n ow ledge of  the e x tr a- m ental; t he  na ture o f the  ext r a- mental a s dist i nc tfrom it srepres en tat ion  in t h e mi nd; th e connec tionb etween a prese n tation and wh a ti s  p r esen ted ; the natur e of judg ment ,  t hou g ht, a nd it sc om p onents, and so on.Iturn b elowto the direct  archivale v i dence to  sup p or t  the view that  thes e discussi o ns werekey e lementsof the vi e w s to whi chMoo reasa st udent was int r o duce d,  and wh ich  form t hecon cep tua lprecursor s for hi spo si ti onas we see it i nNJ. 35  5.  Moor e 's und ergra duat eno t ebo ok: Sto u t' s lect ur es  inthe  h istor y of phi losophy  Substant iat i ng t hi sis part ly assisted b ythe fact t ha t s ome of s ome of M oore's undergraduate wo r k survi ves , amo ng w hich is a  no tebook  of notesMooretookat  le c t ureso f  S tou t' s, and a n o t ebo ok th at  rec ords no tes Moore took att helectures that  Mc Tagg a r tgav e  o n  Lo tz e  in 1 898, along with  essays wr it t en  for Ward. 3 6 I na lette r of 4Febru a ry 1895 , Moore w rites tohi s pa r e nts : Dr Wardthoughtmy work i n  mora l  s cienc e l ast te rm  ha d not  beens uff icien tly lo ok ed aft er; s othis ter m he has set me Lotze's  Metap hysic  to  read (wh ich I d o aloud w ithSanger), a ndI g ive h ima  pape r of po int s , whi ch I find diff i cu lt, e ve ry week, wh i c h  he  look s o v er and  dis cusses with me at his house on S atur d a y a fte r noon s.  On 23 April 1 895 ,M o ore writ es  to his par ents: 'I  h a ve se en Dr.  Ward,  who wi l l  c o ntinue  toloo k over my  ab st r acts of  L ot z e; and  I h av e thesame l e ctur e s  on History of P hilos o p hy wi t h D r. St ou t' (Add .  833 0 2/1/40–5 8). Moore's  Histo ry o f Phi losophy  n oteboo kUN3 2 Note tha t  this int erpre tationmi ghtexp lain w hy B r a dleyappe ar s t o believe t ha t  h is own  8B/ 21/1.  3 3 Cr itical di s cussions  of both Wu nd t's a nd Bre n ta n o 's contras tin g app r o aches in p s ychl an g uagejourna l
 the_purview of_psychology: the nature of_mental states_or_acts. The_attempt_to wrest psychology_away from metaphysics-_particularly a neo-Hegelian metaphysics-was_the attempt to_establish_a science of mind that neither collapsed into philosophy (metaphysics or epistemology) nor collapsed_into_physicalism (leaving_psychology_no_purchase within the empirical sciences).34_Throughout the latter half of_the nineteenth_century the properties of mental states was a_lively_topic of discussion_in the literature, a discussion characterized by the kinds_of issues that persist in philosophy_of mind today:_the_nature_of representation; the kinds_of mental states that are representational;_the tenability of claims to genuine_knowledge of the extra-mental; the nature of_the extra-mental as distinct from its_representation in the mind; the_connection between_a presentation and what is_presented; the nature_of judgment,_thought, and its_components, and so on. I turn_below to the_direct archival evidence to support the_view_that these discussions_were_key_elements of_the views to_which_Moore as_a_student was introduced, and which form_the_conceptual precursors for his position as we_see it in NJ.35_5._Moore's undergraduate notebook: Stout's_lectures in the history of_philosophy Substantiating this is partly assisted_by the_fact that_some of some of Moore's undergraduate work survives, among which is_a notebook of notes Moore took_at lectures of Stout's,_and a_notebook_that records notes_Moore_took at_the lectures that McTaggart gave on Lotze_in 1898,_along with essays written for Ward.36_In a letter of_4_February 1895, Moore writes to his_parents: Dr Ward thought my work_in moral science last term_had_not_been sufficiently looked after; so_this term he has set me_Lotze's Metaphysic to_read (which I do aloud with Sanger),_and_I give him a paper of_points,_which I find difficult, every week,_which_he_looks over and discusses with_me at his house on Saturday_afternoons. On 23 April 1895, Moore writes to his_parents: 'I have_seen Dr. Ward, who will_continue_to_look over my abstracts of Lotze; and I have the_same lectures_on History of_Philosophy with Dr. Stout' (Add. 8330 2/1/40–58). Moore's History of_Philosophy notebookU N32 Note that this interpretation_might explain why Bradley appears to believe that his own 8B/21/1._33 Critical discussions of both Wundt's and Brentano's_contrasting approaches in psych language journal