 when it is not correlated with macroscopic environment. This happens, generally talking, when such an entity exists between two successive measurements. 9 Quantum weirdness appears, when such an entity interacts with macroscopic environment at the end of the second measurement. "Quantum mechanics is, at least at first glance and at least in part, a mathematical machine for predicting the behaviors of microscopic particles - or, at least, of the measuring instruments we use to explore those behaviors - and in that capacity, it is spectacularly successful: in terms of power and precision, head and shoulders above any theory we have ever had. Mathematically, the theory is well understood; we know what its parts are, how they are put together, and why, in the mechanical sense (i.e., in a sense that can be answered by describing the internal grinding of gear against gear), the whole thing performs the way it does, how the information that gets fed in at one end is converted into what comes out the other. The question of what kind of a world it describes, however, is controversial; there is very little agreement, among physicists and among philosophers, about what the world is like according to quantum mechanics. Minimally interpreted, the theory describes a set of facts about the way the microscopic world impinges on the macroscopic one, how it affects our measuring instruments, described in everyday language or the language of classical mechanics. Disagreement centers on the question of what a microscopic world, which affects our apparatuses in the prescribed manner, is, or even could be, like intrinsically; or how those apparatuses could themselves be built out of microscopic parts of the sort the theory describes." 10 In common English, a quantum entity appears to be either a particle, or a strange kind of wave. It appears with a different "personality", which is supposed to be depended on the structure of the measurement apparatus we use. 11 It responds instantly to any change we make to apparatus, sometimes even before we make our decision, as if it knows what we (will) have in our mind. 12 Somehow, it changes its condition and it is transformed into to a regular particle. This transformation obeys to strictly defined rules that are statistical. When such a transformation occurs, we, by no means, know what exactly will happen. A quantum entity appears to communicate instantly with the whole universe. 13 After all, there is the famous Uncertainty Principle of 4 Heisenberg: "According to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the position (momentum) of a particle is given, the less
when it is not correlated with macroscopic environment. This happens, generally talking, when such an entity exist between two consecutive measurements. 9 Quantum weirdness appear, when such an entity interact with macroscopic environment at the end of the second measurement. " Quantum mechanics is, at least at first glance and at least in contribution, a mathematical machine for predict the behaviors of microscopic particles - or, at least, of the measure instruments we use to research those behaviors - and in that capacity, it is spectacularly successful: in terms of power and precision, head and shoulders above any hypothesis we have ever had. Mathematically, the theory is well silent; we know what its parts are, how they are put together, and why, in the mechanical sense (i.e., in a common sense that can be answered by identify the internal grinding of gear against gear), the solid thing performs the way it does, how the information that gets fed in at one end is converted into what comes out the other. The question of what kind of a world it describes, however, is controversial; there is very little agreement, among physicists and among philosophers, about what the universe is like according to quantum mechanics. Minimally interpret, the hypothesis describes a set of facts about the way the microscopic world impinges on the macroscopic one, how it affects our measuring instruments, trace in everyday language or the language of classical mechanics. Disagreement center on the question of what a microscopic world, which affects our apparatuses in the positive manner, is, or even could be, like intrinsically; or how those apparatuses could themselves be build out of microscopic character of the sort the theory describes. " 10 In coarse English, a quantum entity appears to be either a particle, or a strange kind of wave. It appear with a different " personality ", which is supposed to be depended on the structure of the measurement apparatus we practice. 11 It responds instantly to any change we make to apparatus, sometimes even before we make our decisiveness, as if it knows what we (will) have in our mind. 12 Somehow, it changes its circumstance and it is transformed into to a regular atom. This transformation obeys to strictly defined rules that are statistical. When such a transformation occurs, we, by no mean, know what exactly will happen. A quantum entity appear to communicate instantly with the whole universe. 13 After wholly, there is the famous Uncertainty Principle of 4 Heisenberg: " harmonize to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the position (momentum) of a particle is given, the less
 whfn it is not correlated dith macroscopie envirmnment. This haopens, generally talking, when sych ab entity exists betweev two sucbessive mwasucements. 9 Quantum weirdness appswrs, chxn such an entijy interacts with macrosco[iz znvironment at the end of the second measurrmfnt. "Quantum meshanpcf is, at least at first glance and at lsast in part, a mathekatical machine for prediching the behaviors of licroscopic pareucles - or, at least, of uhz measuring instruments we use to explore ghose behaviors - qnd hn that capecity, pt is spectacmkarly vuccessgul: in terms on powxr abd precision, head and shoulders above agy theory wz have ever had. Mathenaricalny, tve tfworh ia xelm undegstkod; we knos what its parts are, how they srq put together, and wry, in the mechanical sense (i.e., in a sense uhat dan be answered by desceibing the internal gtinding of gear against gear), the whole thing performs the wdy it aoew, mow gye information that gets fed in at one end is cjhvtrtvd into what comef out the oyhfr. Jhe question ow what kihd of a world it dfscribef, howwver, is cjntrpversial; there is very littoe agreement, qmong physicists aud among phiuosokhers, sbout what the world is liks according to quantho mechanics. Minioalky interprtged, the theory defcribes a set of facgs anout tre way the microscopic world impinhes ou the macroscoplc one, how it affects our measucmng instrumenjs, gesbribed in evernday language ow the language of clafsicau mechanica. Disagceement centqrs on the quadtion of whav a microfcopuc wirld, whkzh affects our apparatuses in the prescribed manner, is, kr even could bz, oike intrinsicakly; or hlw trmse apparatuves zouuc theoselves be nuiut oit of microscopic pasts kf the sort the throvy descrives." 10 In sommon Englisn, a quantum entity appeers to be eothgr a particle, or a strange kind of wave. Lt wppears with a dlffetent "personclity", which is supposed to be depended oi the structure of the neasurement apparatos ee use. 11 It cesponqs instandly to any change we make to apparatux, sometimes even befode we kake lur decision, as if it knows what we (will) have in our mind. 12 Somehow, it chabges ivs condition znd ot is txanxformeq invo to a regular pagticle. This transformation obeys to striwtjy defined rules that are ststkstical. When ruch a transformation ocdurs, we, ny no means, know what exactly woll happen. A quantum entlty appeaes to communicave instantly with thr wholz univwrse. 13 Adter all, there is thr namous Uncfrtamntv Principle of 4 Heisenberg: "Accordung to qkantum mechanics, the more pvegisely the pjsition (momentum) of z partkcle is given, the less
when it is not correlated with macroscopic happens, talking, when an entity exists Quantum appears, when such entity interacts with environment at the end of the measurement. "Quantum mechanics is, at least at first glance and at least in a mathematical machine for predicting the behaviors of microscopic particles - or, at of measuring we to explore those behaviors - and in that capacity, it is spectacularly successful: in terms of and precision, head and shoulders above any theory have ever had. Mathematically, theory is well understood; we what parts are, they put and why, in mechanical sense (i.e., in a sense that can be answered by describing the internal grinding of gear gear), the performs the it how information that gets at one end is converted into the other. The question of what kind of world it however, is controversial; there is very agreement, among physicists and among philosophers, about what world is like according to quantum mechanics. Minimally interpreted, the theory describes a set of the way the microscopic impinges on the one, it our instruments, described everyday language or the language of classical mechanics. Disagreement centers on question of what a microscopic world, which affects our apparatuses prescribed is, or even be, like intrinsically; or those could themselves be built microscopic of theory 10 common English, a quantum appears to be either a or a strange kind a different "personality", which is supposed to be on the structure of the measurement apparatus use. 11 It responds instantly to any change we make to apparatus, even before our decision, as if it knows what we have in our mind. Somehow, it changes its condition and it is transformed to regular particle. transformation obeys to defined rules that statistical. When such occurs, we, no know happen. A quantum entity appears to instantly the whole universe. 13 After there famous Uncertainty Principle of 4 Heisenberg: "According to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the position a particle is given, less
 when it is not correlated with MacroscopiC enviRonMenT. THis hAppeNs, generally talKIng, wHen such an entity exists bEtweeN tWO sucCEsSive mEasuremENtS. 9 qUanTuM wEirDnESs AppeaRs, wHen such An entity inTerAcTs with macrosCOpIc environmEnt At the end of thE seCond meAsUreMEnt. "QuAntUm mecHanics IS, at leaSt at first GlANce and AT least iN PArT, a maThematical machine FOr PRedicting the beHaviorS oF MiCROscOpiC particles - Or, At leaST, of the mEAsURINg iNStruments we usE to explore tHOse BehaviOrS - anD In that CapacItY, It iS spectaculaRly sUccessful: In termS Of power ANd preciSion, heAd aNd sHoulDErS aBovE aNY thEOrY we HAve Ever had. MAtHeMaticAlly, THE THeorY is Well UnderStood; we know whAt iTs paRTs aRe, how They aRe puT tOgethEr, and wHy, in tHe Mechanical sense (I.e., in A sense thaT caN bE anSwEred bY DescriBinG thE internAl grindINg oF gEAR AgAinst gear), the whole tHiNG PeRforms thE way it DOeS, hOW the infoRmAtiOn thAT Gets fEd in AT oNe end is cOnvertED iNtO what coMeS out thE oTheR. ThE quesTIon oF what kInd of a woRld it DEscribes, howeveR, Is controversiAL; tHERe IS verY liTtle agreemeNt, amONg phYsicIStS anD Among PhiloSoPHeRS, about what the world iS lIke accOrdinG to quantum mecHanics. MiniMALLy interpReteD, ThE Theory describeS a set Of facts aboUT the way tHe micRoscopic World impiNGEs on the mAcrOscOpiC onE, HOw It affects our mEASuriNg InstrumEntS, descriBed In eVerYdaY lAnguage or The languAgE oF cLaSsiCal meCHanics. DiSaGreEmEnt CenteRS on the QuestIon oF wHaT A miCroscopIC wORLd, whIcH aFfecTs oUr ApparAtusES in The presCribed manNer, IS, or eVeN cOuld be, lIke intrinsicaLlY; or how thosE aPpaRatuseS COuld themSelves be built out of microSCopic paRts Of the Sort The theory DesCribes." 10 in cOMmon EnGlish, a QuantUm EntITY appeARS tO be EiTher a partiCLE, or A straNgE kinD of wave. it appears with a diffERenT "personality", wHicH is sUPPoSed TO bE DepEnDEd oN THe structure of thE measuremeNt APpAratus we usE. 11 it rEsPonds inStantly To any CHange we Make to appAratus, somEtImes EVEn bEfore we makE our deciSion, as if iT Knows WHaT we (wiLl) hAve in oUr MinD. 12 SomeHow, it cHAngEs its ConditIoN and it Is traNsFormed inTo to a regular particle. ThiS transFormaTioN obeys to sTriCTly Defined ruLes tHat are statIstIcaL. When SucH A tranSforMAtIon OCcurs, We, by NO means, knoW WhAt eXACtLy will happeN. a QUanTum enTitY AppearS to cOmmunicate instantLY with the whole uNiveRSE. 13 AfTer ALl, thErE is the famous UnCerTaINTy PrinciPlE of 4 HeisenbeRg: "AccordInG To quaNtum meChanicS, the morE PReCIsely tHe poSitIon (momentUm) oF a PArticle Is GiVEn, the lEss
 when it is not correlated  with macr oscop icenv ir onme nt.This happens,g ener ally talking, when suc h anen t itye xi sts b etweent wo s ucc es si veme a su remen ts.  9 Quan tum weirdn ess  a ppears, when su ch an enti tyinteracts wi thmacros co pic envir onm ent a t thee nd ofthe secon dm easure m ent. "Q u a nt um m echanics is, at l e as t  at first glan ce and  a t  l e a stinpart, a ma th emati c al mach i ne f o r p r edicting thebehaviors o f  mi crosco pi c p a rticle s - o r, atleast, of t he m easuringinstru m ents we use toexplor e t hos e be h av io rs-a ndi ntha t  ca pacity,it  i s spe ctac u l a r ly s ucc essf ul: i n terms of po wer  and pre cisio n, he ad a nd  shou ldersabove  a ny theory we ha ve e ver had.Mat he mat ic ally, the th eor y i s wellunderst o od;  w e k no w what its parts a re , ho w they a re put to ge t her, and  w hy,  int h e mec hani c al  sense ( i.e.,i nasense t ha t canbe  an swe red b y  des cribin g the in terna l  grinding of g e ar against ge a r) , th e  who lething perfo rmst he w ay i t  d oes ,  howthe i nf o rm a tion that gets fedin  at on e end  is converted  into what c o mes outtheo th e r. The questio n ofwhat kindo f a worl d itdescribe s, howeve r ,  is cont rov ers ial ; t h e re  is very litt l e  agr ee ment, a mon g physi cis tsand  am on g philoso phers, a bo ut  w ha t t he wo r ld is li ke  ac co rdi ng to quantu m mec hani cs .M ini mally i n te r p rete d,  t he t heo ry  desc ribe s  aset offacts abo utt he w ay  t he micr oscopic world  i mpinges on  t hemacros c o pic one,  how it affects our mea s uring i nst rumen ts,described  in  every day langua ge orthe l an gua g e  of c l a ss ica lmechanics. D isa greem en t ce nters o n the question ofw hat  a microscopi c w orld , wh ich af f ect so ura p paratuses in th e prescrib ed ma nner, is,o r e ve n could  be, li ke in t rinsica lly; or h ow thoseap para t u ses  could the mselvesbe builto ut of mi crosc opi c part softhe s ort th e  th eorydescri be s." 10  In c om mon Engl ish, a quantum entity a ppears  to b e e ither a p art i cle , or a st rang e kind ofwav e.It ap pea r s wit h ad if fer e nt "p erso n ality", w h ic h i s su pposed to b e d epe ndedont he str uctu re of the measure m ent apparatuswe u s e . 1 1 I t  res po nds instantlytoan y change w emake to app aratus,so m etime s even  befor e we ma k e  o u r deci sion , a s if it k now sw hat we(w il l ) have  inou r mind . 12 S o meho w ,  it changes itscondi t i on an d  it  is t ra nsforme d  int o to a reg ular partic le. Th is t ransf ormatio nobeystost rictly def i ned rules  that  are st at isti cal . When  suc h a tra nsfo rm ati on occurs , we ,  b yn o m eans , kno wwhat  exactlyw ill happ en. A quant um  en t i ty app e ar s to communi cat e ins t a ntly witht he w h ol e  univ erse.13 Aft er all, the re  is the  fa m o us Uncert ainty Pri n cip le  of4 Heisen be rg:"A cco rd ing to quantummechanic s, the m o r e prec ise l y th e  posit io n (momentum)  of a  p a rticlei s  gi ven, th e  le ss
 when_it is_not correlated with macroscopic_environment. This_happens,_generally talking,_when_such an entity_exists between two_successive measurements. 9 Quantum_weirdness appears, when_such_an entity interacts with macroscopic environment at the end of the second measurement. "Quantum_mechanics_is, at_least_at_first glance and at least_in part, a mathematical machine_for predicting_the behaviors of microscopic particles - or, at_least,_of the measuring_instruments we use to explore those behaviors - and_in that capacity, it is spectacularly_successful: in terms_of_power_and precision, head and_shoulders above any theory we have_ever had. Mathematically, the theory is_well understood; we know what its parts_are, how they are put together,_and why, in the mechanical_sense (i.e.,_in a sense that can_be answered by_describing the_internal grinding of_gear against gear), the whole thing_performs the way_it does, how the information that_gets_fed in at_one_end_is converted_into what comes_out_the other._The_question of what kind of a_world_it describes, however, is controversial; there is_very little agreement, among_physicists_and among philosophers, about_what the world is like_according to quantum mechanics. Minimally interpreted,_the theory_describes a_set of facts about the way the microscopic world impinges on_the macroscopic one, how it affects_our measuring instruments, described_in everyday_language_or the language_of_classical mechanics._Disagreement centers on the question of what_a microscopic_world, which affects our apparatuses in_the prescribed manner, is,_or_even could be, like intrinsically; or_how those apparatuses could themselves be_built out of microscopic parts_of_the_sort the theory describes." 10_In common English, a quantum entity_appears to be_either a particle, or a strange kind_of_wave. It appears with a different_"personality",_which is supposed to be depended_on_the_structure of the measurement apparatus_we use. 11 It responds instantly_to any change we make to apparatus, sometimes even_before we make_our decision, as if it_knows_what_we (will) have in our mind. 12 Somehow, it changes_its condition_and it is_transformed into to a regular particle. This transformation obeys to_strictly defined rules that are statistical. When_such a transformation occurs, we, by no means, know what exactly_will happen. A quantum entity appears to communicate_instantly with the whole universe. 13 After_all, there is the_famous_Uncertainty Principle of 4 Heisenberg: "According to_quantum_mechanics,_the_more precisely the_position (momentum) of_a particle is_given, the_less