 of text linguistics closely related with the discourse analysis. Secondly, while the discourse analysis has been taken up by various social science disciplines, the political discourse provides one characteristic of my research by allowing a policy analysis feasible based on debates, speeches, and hearings within the political forums and effective from the post-positivist perspective.3 Thirdly, the critical discourse (CDA) analysis can pertain to my study as one lens of analysis, in which the data collected from various sources could be processed into meaning, theme and story (Van Dijk, 2016). It primarily is concerned of the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. By delineating dissident research, the analysts in this standing take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality. The tenets began to be developed by the Frankfurt School before the Second World War and infused many other European scholarships. The basic assumption would be (i) the explicit awareness of participant's role in the society is crucial (ii) the possibility of a value-free 3 Of course, the use is subject to its own assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodologies spanning from linguistics, sociology, anthropology, social work, cognitive science, social psychology, area studies, international relations, human geography, communication studies, through translation studies. 4 science is unacceptable and scholarship should attend the social interaction and social structure provided that we are socio-politically situated whether we like it or not (2016). As toned to the qualitative method generally, the CDA tries to explain discourse structures rather than merely describe them. It, therefore, holds a focus to explicate the relations of power and dominance in society by analyzing the ways discourse structures enact, confirm, legitimate, reproduce, or challenge such relations. This analytical tool is useful since it addresses social problems, deals with society and culture, would be ideological and historical as well as interpretive and explanatory. It is particularly helpful to my approaches so that the text and society can be linked and mediated by means of such analysis, while it is also a form of social action. Considerations to Develop and Test the DCT In my case, the sources of data are abundant that the research objects, participants, audience and interest holders daily speak, express their thoughts, and interchange so as to be publicly exposed. The interested articles and books are, though indirect, yet closely linked, also are fairly available through neighborly libraries. Therefore, the
of text linguistics closely related with the discourse psychoanalysis. second, while the discussion analysis has been lead up by respective social science disciplines, the political discussion put up one characteristic of my inquiry by allow a policy psychoanalysis feasible based on debates, lecture, and listening within the political forums and effective from the post - positivist perspective.3 third, the critical discourse (CDA) psychoanalysis can refer to my study as one lens of analysis, in which the data collected from versatile sources could be processed into meaning, theme and story (Van Dijk, 2016). It chiefly is concerned of the room social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are ordain, reproduced and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. By delineating dissident research, the analysts in this standing take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality. The tenets begin to be developed by the Frankfurt School before the Second World War and infused many early European scholarship. The basic presumption would be (i) the explicit awareness of player's role in the club is crucial (ii) the possibility of a value - spare 3 Of course, the use is subject to its own assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodology spanning from linguistics, sociology, anthropology, social work, cognitive science, social psychology, area study, external relation, human geography, communication studies, through translation studies. 4 science is unacceptable and scholarship should attend the social interaction and social social organization provided that we are socio - politically located whether we like it or not (2016). As toned to the qualitative method generally, the CDA tries to excuse discourse structures rather than merely describe them. It, therefore, control a focus to explicate the relations of exponent and dominance in society by analyze the ways hold forth structures enact, confirm, legitimate, reproduce, or challenge such relations. This analytical tool is useful since it addresses social problems, deal with society and culture, would be ideological and diachronic as well as interpretive and explanatory. It is peculiarly helpful to my approaches so that the text and society can be linked and mediated by means of such analysis, while it is also a form of social action. Considerations to Develop and screen the DCT In my subject, the source of data are abundant that the research object, participants, audience and sake holders daily speak, press out their thoughts, and interchange so as to be publicly exposed. The interested articles and bible are, though indirect, yet closely linked, also are fairly available through neighborly libraries. consequently, the
 of text linguistics closeln related with tkw discmurse znalysis. Secondly, while the discoursx anqlysiw has been taken up by various docial sxienre disciplines, tis politleal djdcouxsx provides one gharacterisdic of my resedrzh by allowing a policy analysis feasyble baxef on debates, skeechts, wnd gvavings within the political foruma and ehfective from tne post-positivist perspectlve.3 Hhirdly, the criticwl discoursg (CDW) analysis cav pertain uo my study zs one lens of analysis, in whicf the data collgered xrom variouw sougces could be processad into meaning, theme anv stiry (Van Dijk, 2016). It primerily is concerned os the way skcial power abuse, diminatce, dnd kbeqjaljtb ade enaftev, reproduces and resisred by text and tall yb the social znd pojieical context. By delineating dissident gesezrch, the analysts in thus standing take expllcit posieion, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimdtely fesnwt sozuap inequality. The tenets began to be developed gy tme Frankfurt Schjol before yhf Xgcond World Wat and iuruaed many other Eurlpean ssholaeships. Tht basoc assumption would be (i) thw explicit acarwness of participaut's role in che soviety is crucial (ii) the possnbilitg of a valuf-free 3 Of zourse, the use ir slbjewt to its own assumptions, qimensionw of analysks, amd metrodologies spankhng from linguistifs, soeiolocy, anthropllogy, social work, cognitive scixice, social psichmlocy, area ftudics, internationaj relations, hukan geoyraphy, communicanion studmes, through eranslation sdodies. 4 sciencx is unacseptqble and scfularship shoulc attend nht social ibteraction and soclal sjrhcture provided thqt we are socio-lolktisaplb sittdted whether we uikd it of not (2016). As tived yo the qualitative mathos generally, the CDS bries to gxplain dyscourse struvtures rather than mereny vescrine jhem. It, therefore, holds a focus to explifatc the relatiogs on porer and dokinance in society by analyzing the wayw discourse strucjures enact, confirm, lggiuimate, reprodnce, or challenga such relations. Thiw analytical tool is useful since it asdressas sofial problems, deals with society and culture, would be ideological and hisrorical as well as intrrprenivz aud explwnatlcy. It is particulsrly helpful to my approaches su that tve text and society can be linlea and mediatea by means of such analyais, whilr it is also a form of social avtion. Considerations to Cevelop qnd Tsst thv DRT In my case, the soirces mf dara are qbunfant that the rexewrch objefts, kartncipants, audience and interest hooders eally speak, expresv their thomgmts, ans intetchange so as to ge phhlicli exposed. The onterested artocles and books are, nhotgh indirect, ytt closely linkgd, also dre fairly atailable thrmugh neighborly libraries. Therefore, the
of text linguistics closely related with the Secondly, the discourse has been taken disciplines, political discourse provides characteristic of my by allowing a policy analysis feasible on debates, speeches, and hearings within the political forums and effective from the perspective.3 Thirdly, the critical discourse (CDA) analysis can pertain to my study as lens analysis, which data collected from various sources could be processed into meaning, theme and story (Van Dijk, 2016). primarily is concerned of the way social power dominance, and inequality are reproduced and resisted by text talk the social political By dissident research, the in this standing take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality. tenets began developed by Frankfurt before Second World War many other European scholarships. The basic (i) the explicit awareness of participant's role in society is (ii) the possibility of a value-free Of course, the use is subject to its assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodologies spanning from linguistics, sociology, anthropology, social work, cognitive science, area studies, international relations, geography, communication studies, translation 4 is and scholarship attend the social interaction and social structure provided that we are situated whether we like it or not (2016). As toned qualitative generally, the CDA to explain discourse structures than describe them. It, therefore, focus explicate power dominance society by analyzing the discourse structures enact, confirm, legitimate, or challenge such relations. since it addresses social problems, deals with society culture, would be ideological and historical as as interpretive and explanatory. It is particularly helpful to my approaches so the text can be linked and mediated by means of analysis, while it is a form of social action. Considerations to Develop and the In my the sources of are abundant that research objects, participants, interest holders speak, their so as to be publicly exposed. interested and books are, though indirect, closely are fairly available through neighborly libraries. Therefore, the
 of text linguistics closely rElated with The diScoUrsE aNalySis. SEcondly, while thE DiscOurse analysis has been taKen up By VArioUS sOcial Science DIsCIPliNeS, tHe pOlITiCal diScoUrse proVides one chAraCtEristic of my rESeArch by alloWinG a policy analYsiS feasiBlE baSEd on dEbaTes, spEeches, ANd hearIngs withiN tHE politICal foruMS AnD effEctive from the post-POsITivist perspectIve.3 ThiRdLY, tHE CriTicAl discoursE (CdA) anaLYsis can PErTAIN to MY study as one leNs of analysiS, In wHich thE dAta COllectEd froM vARioUs sources coUld bE processeD into mEAning, thEMe and stOry (Van dijK, 2016). It PrimARiLy Is cOnCErnED oF thE Way Social poWeR aBuse, dOminANCE, And iNeqUaliTy are Enacted, reprodUceD and REsiSted bY text And tAlK in thE sociaL and pOlItical context. By DeliNeating diSsiDeNt rEsEarch, THe analYstS in This staNding taKE exPlICIT pOsition, and thus want To UNDeRstand, exPose, anD UlTiMAtely resIsT soCial INEqualIty. THE tEnets begAn to be DEvElOped by tHe frankfUrT ScHooL befoRE the second world War And inFUsed many other EURopean scholarSHiPS. thE BasiC asSumption wouLd be (I) The eXpliCIt AwaREness Of parTiCIpANt's role in the society Is CruciaL (ii) thE possibility oF a value-freE 3 oF Course, thE use IS sUBject to its own aSsumpTions, dimenSIons of anAlysiS, and methOdologies SPAnning frOm lIngUisTicS, SOcIology, anthropOLOgy, sOcIal work, CogNitive sCieNce, SocIal PsYchology, aRea studiEs, InTeRnAtiOnal rELations, hUmAn gEoGraPhy, coMMunicaTion sTudiEs, ThROugH translATiON StudIeS. 4 sCienCe iS uNaccePtabLE anD scholaRship shouLd aTTend ThE sOcial inTeraction and sOcIal structuRe ProVided tHAT we are soCio-politically situated wHEther we LikE it or Not (2016). AS toned to tHe qUalitaTivE Method GeneraLly, thE CdA tRIEs to eXPLaIn dIsCourse struCTUreS rathEr Than Merely dEscribe them. It, thereFOre, Holds a focus to ExpLicaTE ThE reLAtIOns Of POweR ANd dominance in soCiety by anaLyZInG the ways diSCouRsE structUres enaCt, conFIrm, legiTimate, repRoduce, or cHaLlenGE SucH relations. this analYtical tooL Is useFUl Since It aDdressEs SocIal prOblems, DEalS with SocietY aNd cultUre, woUlD be ideolOgical and historical as weLl as inTerprEtiVe and explAnaTOry. it is partiCulaRly helpful To mY apProacHes SO that The tEXt And SOcietY can BE linked anD MeDiaTED bY means of sucH ANAlySis, whIle IT is alsO a foRm of social action. CONsiderations to deveLOP anD TeST the dCt In my case, the soUrcEs OF Data are aBuNdant that thE researcH oBJects, ParticIpants, AudiencE ANd INteresT holDerS daily speAk, eXpREss theiR tHoUGhts, anD intErChange So as to BE pubLICly exposed. The intErestED ArticLEs aNd booKs Are, thouGH indIrect, yet clOsely linked, Also arE faiRly avAilable ThRough nEigHbOrly librarIEs. TherefoRe, the
 of text linguistics close ly related  with  th e d is cour se a nalysis. Secon d ly,while the discourse an alysi sh as b e en  take n up by va r i ous  s oc ial  s c ie nce d isc iplines , the poli tic al  discourse p r ov ides one c har acteristic o f m y rese ar chb y all owi ng apolicy analys is feasib le basedo n debat e s ,spee ches, and hearing s  w i thin the polit ical f or u ms a ndeff ective fro mthe p o st-posi t iv i s t  pe r spective.3 Th irdly, thec rit ical d is cou r se (CD A) an al y sis  can pertai n to  my study  as on e  lens o f  analys is, in  wh ich  the da ta  co ll e cte d  f rom var ious sou rc es  coul d be p r o cess edinto  mean ing, theme an d s tory (Va n Dij k, 20 16).  I t pri marily  is c on cerned of the w ay s ocial pow erab use ,domin a nce, a ndine quality  are en a cte d, r e pr oduced and resiste db y  t ext andtalk i n  t he social a nd  po liti c a l con text .  B y deline atingd is si dent re se arch,th e a nal ystsi n th is sta nding ta ke ex p licit position ,  and thus wan t  t o un d erst and , expose, a nd u l tima tely re sis t  soci al in eq u al i ty. The tenets bega nto bedevel oped by the F rankfurt S c h o ol befor e th e  S e cond World War  andinfused ma n y otherEurop ean scho larships. T he basic  as sum pti onw o ul d be (i) thee x plic it  awaren ess  of par tic ipa nt' s r ol e in thesocietyis  c ru ci al(ii)t he possi bi lit yofa val u e-free  3 Of  cou rs e, the  use is su b j ectto  i ts o wnas sumpt ions ,  di mension s of anal ysi s , an dme thodolo gies spanning  f rom lingui st ics , soci o l ogy, ant hropology, social work, cogniti vescien ce,social ps ych ology,  ar e a stud ies, i ntern at ion a l  rela t i on s,hu man geogra p h y,commu ni cati on stud ies, through trans l ati on studies. 4  sc ienc e is  un a cc e pta bl e  an d scholarship sho uld attend  t h esocial int e rac ti on andsocialstruc t ure pro vided tha t we areso cio- p o lit ically sit uated wh ether wel ike i t  o r not  (2 016).As  to ned t o theq ual itati ve met ho d gene rally ,the CDAtries to explain discou rse st ructu res  rather t han mer ely descr ibethem. It,the ref ore,hol d s a f ocus to  ex p licat e th e  relation s  o f p o w er  and domina n c e  in  soci ety by ana lyzi ng the ways disco u rse structures  ena c t , c onf i rm,le gitimate, repr odu ce , or chall en ge such rel ations.Th i s ana lytica l tool  is use f u ls ince i t ad dre sses soci alpr o blems,de al s  withsoci et y andcultur e , wo u l d be ideological  andh i stori c alas we ll  as int e rpre tive and e xplanatory.  It is  par ticul arly he lp ful to  my  a pproachess o that th e tex t and s oc iety  ca n be l inke d and m edia te d b y means o f su c han a lys is,while  i t is  also a f o rm of so cia l  action .Con s i derati o ns t o Developand  Test t he DCT Inm y ca s e, the s ources  of da ta area bun da nt that  th e researchobjects,p art ic ipan ts, audi en ce a nd  in te rest holders da ily spea k, expre s s  their  th o ught s , andin terchange so  as t ob e publi c l y e xposed. The  in ter este d a rtic l es and books are, though  ind irect ,  ye t clo selyli nked, al s o ar e fairly available thr ough neighborly lib r arie s.T he re fore, the 
 of_text linguistics_closely related with the_discourse analysis._Secondly,_while the_discourse_analysis has been_taken up by_various social science disciplines,_the political discourse_provides_one characteristic of my research by allowing a policy analysis feasible based on debates,_speeches,_and hearings_within_the_political forums and effective from_the post-positivist perspective.3 Thirdly, the_critical discourse_(CDA) analysis can pertain to my study as_one_lens of analysis,_in which the data collected from various sources could_be processed into meaning, theme and_story (Van Dijk,_2016)._It_primarily is concerned of_the way social power abuse, dominance,_and inequality are enacted, reproduced and_resisted by text and talk in the_social and political context. By delineating_dissident research, the analysts in_this standing_take explicit position, and thus_want to understand,_expose, and_ultimately resist social_inequality. The tenets began to be_developed by the_Frankfurt School before the Second World_War_and infused many_other_European_scholarships. The_basic assumption would_be_(i) the_explicit_awareness of participant's role in the_society_is crucial (ii) the possibility of a_value-free 3 Of course,_the_use is subject to_its own assumptions, dimensions of_analysis, and methodologies spanning from linguistics,_sociology, anthropology,_social work,_cognitive science, social psychology, area studies, international relations, human geography, communication_studies, through translation studies. 4 science_is unacceptable and scholarship_should attend_the_social interaction and_social_structure provided_that we are socio-politically situated whether we_like it_or not (2016). As toned to_the qualitative method generally,_the_CDA tries to explain discourse structures_rather than merely describe them. It,_therefore, holds a focus to_explicate_the_relations of power and dominance_in society by analyzing the ways_discourse structures enact,_confirm, legitimate, reproduce, or challenge such relations._This_analytical tool is useful since it_addresses_social problems, deals with society and_culture,_would_be ideological and historical as_well as interpretive and explanatory. It_is particularly helpful to my approaches so that the_text and society_can be linked and mediated_by_means_of such analysis, while it is also a form of_social action._Considerations to Develop_and Test the DCT In my case, the sources of_data are abundant that the research objects,_participants, audience and interest holders daily speak, express their thoughts, and_interchange so as to be publicly exposed. The_interested articles and books are, though indirect,_yet closely linked, also_are_fairly available through neighborly libraries. Therefore, the