ative-Sentence [This sentence is false] into its equivalent Mathematical Proposition we must do this as a sequence of steps in strict prerequisite order: Proposition p: 1) Define the Proposition.Assertion Declarative Sentence: The Boolean value of p equals False. Formalized as: p.Assertion.haveEqualValues(p.Boolean.Value, False) 2) Test the Proposition.Assertion Interrogative Sentence: Does the Boolean value of p equal False? Formalized as: TestResult = testEquality(p.Boolean.Value, False) 3) Initialize the Proposition.Boolean.Value on the basis of prior testing Formalized as: p.Boolean.Value = TestResult From the above formalized steps we can see that the Liar Paradox attempts to initialize its Boolean value entirely on the basis of testing this same Boolean value before it has come into existence. Comparing an undefined (semantically empty thus non-existent) Boolean value to False is like measuring the length of your car when you have no car. Because the comparison shown in step (2) above fails the assignment shown in step (3) never occurs. Conclusion When Saul Kripke proposed that the Liar Paradox is ungrounded he meant that there is no place where the Liar Paradox is obtaining its Boolean value from. This paper shows the precise reason why the Liar Paradox is semantically ungrounded and therefore unequivocally logically incorrect. Outline of a Theory of Truth: Saul Kripke (1975). http://philo.ruc.edu.cn/logic/reading/Kripke_%20Theory%20of%20Truth.pdf Meaning Postulates: Rudolf Carnap (1952) http://LiarParadox.org/Meaning_Postulates_Rudolf_Carnap_1952.pdf The Philosophy of Logical Atomism: Bertrand Russell (1918) http://LiarParadox.org/The_Philosophy_of_Logical_Atomism_Bertand_Russell_1918.pdf RESET DOC, Friday, 11 April 2014 1 EUROPE Friday, 11 April 2014 Streeck replies, and the debate goes on1 Luca Corchia If one addresses the controversy between Wolfgang Streeck and Jürgen Habermas following the "logic of demand and supply" that Hans-Georg Gadamer[1] posed as the foundation for all prag
ative - Sentence [ This sentence is false ] into its equivalent Mathematical Proposition we must do this as a sequence of footstep in nonindulgent prerequisite order: Proposition p: 1) specify the Proposition. Assertion Declarative Sentence: The Boolean value of p equals False. validate as: phosphorus. Assertion.haveEqualValues(p. Boolean. Value, False) 2) Test the Proposition. Assertion Interrogative Sentence: Does the Boolean value of p equal assumed? Formalized as: TestResult = testEquality(p. Boolean. Value, False) 3) format the Proposition. Boolean. Value on the basis of prior examination Formalized as: p. Boolean. Value = TestResult From the above formalize tone we can see that the Liar Paradox attempts to initialize its Boolean value wholly on the basis of testing this like Boolean value before it has come into universe. Comparing an undefined (semantically empty therefore non - existent) Boolean value to False is like measuring the length of your car when you own no car. Because the comparison shown in step (2) above fails the assignment indicate in step (3) never occurs. Conclusion When Saul Kripke proposed that the Liar Paradox is ungrounded he meant that there is no place where the Liar Paradox is obtaining its Boolean value from. This paper shows the accurate rationality why the Liar Paradox is semantically ungrounded and therefore unambiguously logically wrong. Outline of a hypothesis of Truth: Saul Kripke (1975). http://philo.ruc.edu.cn/logic/reading/Kripke_%20Theory%20of%20Truth.pdf Meaning Postulates: Rudolf Carnap (1952) http://LiarParadox.org/Meaning_Postulates_Rudolf_Carnap_1952.pdf The Philosophy of Logical Atomism: Bertrand Russell (1918) http://LiarParadox.org/The_Philosophy_of_Logical_Atomism_Bertand_Russell_1918.pdf RESET DOC, Friday, 11 April 2014 1 EUROPE Friday, 11 April 2014 Streeck replies, and the debate goes on1 Luca Corchia If one addresses the controversy between Wolfgang Streeck and Jürgen Habermas following the " logic of demand and supply " that Hans - Georg Gadamer[1 ] perplex as the foundation for all prag
atige-Sentence [This sentence is false] into nrs equmvalent Mathemagical Proposition we must do tyis aw a sequence of steps kn strict prerequusitt order: Proposition p: 1) Dennne tgc Pro'owition.Assertiok Declaratiee Sentence: Tha Collean value of p equals False. Formajized ax: o.Assertion.haveGqualNajues(l.Boolean.Value, False) 2) Test the Propksition.Essertion Intertogative Sentence: Does the Boopean value of p eqkal False? Firmajuzed as: TestFesult = testEquality(p.Bkolean.Value, False) 3) Initialize tfe Prpposition.Biooeaj.Ealue on thx basif of prior tcxting Xormaliaed as: p.Booleak.Valux = TwstResult From the abmve formalized steks we can vez that the Liar Paradix attekpts to kbitkaljzx ifs Boopeai value entjrely on thw basis of testing uhif same Boolean value bqfore it has come into existence. Comparpng zn undefined (semanticaloy empty thus non-exisjent) Boolewn value to False is like measuring the length of your zar wmen hiu have no car. Because the comparison shown in ffek (2) sbove fails thc assignment shown ij xjep (3) never occors. Conemuaion When Saul Krioke prokosed rhat the Jiar Paradox is ungrounded he mwant that thvre us no place where che Liar Parcdox ix obtsining its Boolean valuz from. This paper shows ths precise reason dhy tve Liar Kxradox is semantisally ungcoundzd and tferegore ugequivocalpy lonhcally incorrect. Oktling of a Theory of Truth: Saul Kripke (1975). http://philo.rur.xdu.cn/logic/reacitg/Kgipke_%20Theoxy%20of%20Trmth.pdf Meaning [ostulates: Rudplf Caruap (1952) hgtp://LiarParzdox.org/Keaning_Posttlates_Rudolf_Cdtnap_1952.pdf The Piilosophy of Oogixal Atooksm: Bertrand Rissell (1918) hntk://LiarParadix.org/The_Philosophy_pf_Lufical_Atomism_Berccne_Russell_1918.pdf RESRT AOC, Fgidey, 11 A[sil 2014 1 EUROPE Friaay, 11 Apriu 2014 Stretek vepuies, and the debate goes on1 Muca Corchia If onr wddressew the cogtroversy beteeen Wolfgang Stretck anv Jürgei Habetmaf following the "logic of demans and supoly" that Hans-Gejrg Nadaier[1] posed cs the foundation for all prag
ative-Sentence [This sentence is false] into its Proposition must do as a sequence order: p: 1) Define Proposition.Assertion Declarative Sentence: Boolean value of p equals False. as: p.Assertion.haveEqualValues(p.Boolean.Value, False) 2) Test the Proposition.Assertion Interrogative Sentence: Does the Boolean value p equal False? Formalized as: TestResult = testEquality(p.Boolean.Value, False) 3) Initialize the Proposition.Boolean.Value the of testing as: p.Boolean.Value = TestResult From the above formalized steps we can see that the Liar Paradox to initialize its Boolean value entirely on the of testing this same value before it has come existence. an undefined empty non-existent) value to False like measuring the length of your car when you have no car. Because the comparison shown in (2) above assignment shown step never Conclusion When Saul that the Liar Paradox is ungrounded there is no place where the Liar Paradox obtaining its value from. This paper shows the reason why the Liar Paradox is semantically ungrounded therefore unequivocally logically incorrect. Outline of a Theory of Truth: Saul Kripke (1975). http://philo.ruc.edu.cn/logic/reading/Kripke_%20Theory%20of%20Truth.pdf Meaning Carnap (1952) http://LiarParadox.org/Meaning_Postulates_Rudolf_Carnap_1952.pdf The of Logical Atomism: Russell http://LiarParadox.org/The_Philosophy_of_Logical_Atomism_Bertand_Russell_1918.pdf DOC, 11 April 1 EUROPE Friday, 11 April 2014 Streeck replies, and the debate on1 Luca Corchia If one addresses the controversy between Wolfgang Jürgen following the "logic demand and supply" that Gadamer[1] as the foundation for
ative-Sentence [This sentence Is false] intO its eQuiValEnT MatHemaTical PropositiON we mUst do this as a sequence of Steps In STricT PrErequIsite orDEr: pROpoSiTiOn p: 1) deFInE the PRopOsition.assertion DEclArAtive SentencE: thE Boolean vaLue Of p equals FalSe. FOrmaliZeD as: P.asserTioN.haveequalVALues(p.BOolean.ValUe, fAlse) 2) TeST the ProPOSiTion.assertion InterrogATiVE Sentence: Does tHe BoolEaN VaLUE of P eqUal False? FoRmAlizeD As: TestRESuLT = TEsteQuality(p.BooleAn.Value, FalsE) 3) iniTializE tHe PROpositIon.BoOlEAn.VAlue on the baSis oF prior tesTing FoRMalized AS: p.BooleAn.ValuE = TeStREsulT frOm The AbOVe fORmAliZEd sTeps we caN sEe That tHe LiAR pARadoX atTempTs to iNitialize its BOolEan vALue EntirEly on The bAsIs of tEsting This sAmE Boolean value beFore It has come IntO eXisTeNce. CoMParing An uNdeFined (seManticaLLy eMpTY THuS non-existent) BooleaN vALUe To False iS like mEAsUrINg the lenGtH of Your CAR when You hAVe No car. BecAuse thE CoMpArison sHoWn in stEp (2) AboVe fAils tHE assIgnmenT shown in Step (3) nEVer occurs. ConclUSion When Saul KRIpKE PrOPoseD thAt the Liar PaRadoX Is unGrouNDeD he MEant tHat thErE Is NO place where the Liar PArAdox is ObtaiNing its BooleaN value from. tHIS paper shOws tHE pREcise reason why The LiAr Paradox iS SemanticAlly uNgroundeD and thereFORe unequiVocAllY loGicALLy Incorrect. OutlINE of a thEory of TRutH: Saul KrIpkE (1975). htTp://pHilO.rUc.edu.cn/loGic/readiNg/krIpKe_%20theOry%20of%20tRuth.pdf MEaNinG POstUlateS: rudolf carnaP (1952) httP://LIaRparAdox.org/mEaNINg_PoStUlAtes_rudOlF_CarnAp_1952.pdF the philosoPhy of LogiCal aTomiSm: beRtrand RUssell (1918) http://LiaRPAradox.org/THe_phiLosophY_OF_Logical_atomism_Bertand_Russell_1918.pdF rESET DOc, FrIday, 11 APril 2014 1 eUROPE FriDay, 11 april 2014 STreECk replIes, and The deBaTe gOES on1 LuCA coRchIa if one addreSSEs tHe conTrOverSy betweEn Wolfgang Streeck aND JüRgen Habermas fOllOwinG THe "LogIC oF DemAnD And SUPply" that Hans-GeoRg Gadamer[1] pOsED aS the foundaTIon FoR all praG
ative-Sentence [This sente nce is fal se] i nto  it sequi vale nt Mathematica l  Pro position we must do th is as  a sequ e nc e ofsteps i n  s t r ict  p re req ui s it e ord er:  Propos ition p: 1 ) D ef ine the Prop o si tion.Asser tio n Declarativ e S entenc e:  Th e  Bool ean  valu e of p equals  False. F or m alized as: p.A s s er tion .haveEqualValues( p .B o olean.Value, F alse)2) Te s t  th e P roposition .A ssert i on Inte r ro g a t ive Sentence: Doe s the Boole a n v alue o fp e q ual Fa lse?Fo r mal ized as: Te stRe sult = te stEqua l ity(p.B o olean.V alue,Fal se)  3)I ni ti ali ze the Pr opo s iti on.Boole an .V alueon t h e b asis  of  pri or te sting Formali zed  as: p.B oolea n.Val ue =  T estRe sult F rom t he  above formaliz ed s teps we c anse e t ha t the Liar P ara dox  attemp ts to i n iti al i z e  i ts Boolean value e nt i r el y on the  basis of  t e sting th is  sa me B o o leanvalu e  b efore it  has c o me  i nto exi st ence.Co mpa rin g anu ndef ined ( semantic allye mpty thus non- e xistent) Bool e an v al u e to  Fa lse is like  mea s urin g th e  l eng t h ofyourca r  w h en you have no car.  B ecause  thecomparison sh own in ste p ( 2) above  fai l st he assignmentshown  in step ( 3 ) neveroccur s. Concl usion Whe n Saul Kri pke  pr opo sed t ha t the Liar Pa r a doxis  ungrou nde d he me ant  th atthe re  is no pl ace wher eth eLi arParad o x is obt ai nin gits  Bool e an val ue fr om.Th is pap er show s  t h e  pre ci se  rea son  w hy th e Li a r P aradoxis semant ica l ly u ng ro unded a nd thereforeun equivocall ylog ically i ncorrect . Outline of a Theory o f  Truth:  Sa ul Kr ipke  (1975).htt p://ph ilo . ruc.ed u.cn/l ogic/ re adi n g /Krip k e _% 20T he ory%20of%2 0 T rut h.pdf  M eani ng Post ulates: Rudolf Car n ap(1952) http:/ /Li arPa r a do x.o r g/ M ean in g _Po s t ulates_Rudolf_C arnap_1952 .p d fThe Philos o phy  o f Logic al Atom ism:B ertrand  Russell(1918) ht tp ://L i a rPa radox.org/ The_Phil osophy_of _ Logic a l_ Atomi sm_ Bertan d_ Rus sell_ 1918.p d f R ESETDOC, F ri day, 1 1 Apr il  2014 1EUROPE Friday, 11 April  2014Stree ckreplies,and the  debate g oeson1 Luca C orc hia  If o nea ddres sest he  co n trove rsyb etween Wo l fg ang S tr eeck and Jü r g e n H aberm asf ollowi ng t he "logic of dema n d and supply"that H ans -Ge o rg G ad amer[1] posedasth e foundati on  for all pr ag
ative-Sentence [This_sentence is_false] into its equivalent_Mathematical Proposition_we_must do_this_as a sequence_of steps in_strict prerequisite order: Proposition_p: 1) Define_the_Proposition.Assertion Declarative Sentence: The Boolean value of p equals False. Formalized as: p.Assertion.haveEqualValues(p.Boolean.Value, False)_2)_Test the_Proposition.Assertion_Interrogative_Sentence: Does the Boolean value_of p equal False? Formalized_as: TestResult_= testEquality(p.Boolean.Value, False) 3) Initialize the Proposition.Boolean.Value on_the_basis of prior_testing Formalized as: p.Boolean.Value = TestResult From the above_formalized steps we can see that_the Liar Paradox_attempts_to_initialize its Boolean value_entirely on the basis of testing_this same Boolean value before it_has come into existence. Comparing an undefined_(semantically empty thus non-existent) Boolean value_to False is like measuring_the length_of your car when you_have no car._Because the_comparison shown in_step (2) above fails the assignment_shown in step_(3) never occurs. Conclusion When Saul_Kripke_proposed that the_Liar_Paradox_is ungrounded_he meant that_there_is no_place_where the Liar Paradox is obtaining_its_Boolean value from. This paper shows the_precise reason why the_Liar_Paradox is semantically ungrounded_and therefore unequivocally logically incorrect._Outline of a Theory of Truth:_Saul Kripke_(1975). http://philo.ruc.edu.cn/logic/reading/Kripke_%20Theory%20of%20Truth.pdf_Meaning Postulates: Rudolf Carnap (1952) http://LiarParadox.org/Meaning_Postulates_Rudolf_Carnap_1952.pdf The Philosophy of Logical Atomism:_Bertrand Russell (1918) http://LiarParadox.org/The_Philosophy_of_Logical_Atomism_Bertand_Russell_1918.pdf RESET DOC,_Friday, 11 April 2014_1 EUROPE_Friday,_11 April 2014_Streeck_replies, and_the debate goes on1 Luca Corchia If_one addresses_the controversy between Wolfgang Streeck and_Jürgen Habermas following the_"logic_of demand and supply" that Hans-Georg_Gadamer[1] posed as the foundation for_all prag