 rather than as competing will depend on how they are spelled out in detail – after all, for instance, both theory-theory and simulation theory come in rather 'different flavours'. 30 Notice that the first level in my model is even more basic than level (I) in Karmiloff-Smith's model. Accordingly, my account posits at least four different levels, while Karmiloff-Smith's account posits three levels (if E2/3 representations are taken together as one level). However, I do not necessarily mean to suggest that children remain at this very basic level up until the age of 9 months – it is entirely possible that one might have to allow for even more fine-grained distinctions throughout the different developmental stages than the ones outlined here. Forthcoming in Grazer Philosophische Studien 84 (2012), p. 75-101 21 Bibliography Amsterdam, Beulah 1972: "Mirror Self-image Reactions Before the Age of Two." Developmental Psychobiology 5, 297-305. Anisfeld, Moshe 1991: "Neonatal Imitation." Developmental Review 11, 60–97. Astington, Janet W. & Jenkins, Jennifer M. 1999: "A Longitudinal Study of the Relation between Language and Theory-of-mind development." Developmental Psychology 35, 1311– 1320. Barresi, John & Moore, Chris 1996: "Intentional Relations and Social Understanding." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 107-154 Bates, Elizabeth 1979: The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press. Bermúdez, José L. 1998: The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Call, Joseph & Tomasello, Michael 2008: "Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? 30 Years Later." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12, 187–192. Dienes, Zoltan & Perner, Josef 1999: "A Theory of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 735-808. Dokic, Jérome 2003: "The Sense of Ownership: An Analogy Between Sensation and Action." In Johannes Roessler (ed.), Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 321-344. Evans, Gareth 1982: The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford
rather than as competing will depend on how they are spelled out in contingent – subsequently wholly, for instance, both theory - theory and pretense theory come in quite' unlike flavours'. 30 Notice that the first level in my model is even more basic than horizontal surface (I) in Karmiloff - Smith's model. consequently, my account posits at least four different levels, while Karmiloff - Smith's account posits three levels (if E2/3 representation are taken together as one level). However, I do not inevitably mean to suggest that child remain at this very basic degree up until the age of 9 months – it is entirely possible that one might have to permit for even more fine - grained distinctions throughout the different developmental stages than the one outlined here. Forthcoming in Grazer Philosophische Studien 84 (2012), p. 75 - 101 21 Bibliography Amsterdam, Beulah 1972: " Mirror Self - image Reactions Before the Age of Two. " Developmental Psychobiology 5, 297 - 305. Anisfeld, Moshe 1991: " Neonatal Imitation. " Developmental Review 11, 60–97. Astington, Janet W. & Jenkins, Jennifer M. 1999: " A Longitudinal Study of the Relation between Language and Theory - of - mind development. " Developmental Psychology 35, 1311 – 1320. Barresi, John & Moore, Chris 1996: " Intentional Relations and Social Understanding. " Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 107 - 154 Bates, Elizabeth 1979: The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press. Bermúdez, José L. 1998: The Paradox of Self - Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Call, Joseph & Tomasello, Michael 2008: " Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? 30 Years Later. " tendency in Cognitive Sciences 12, 187–192. Dienes, Zoltan & Perner, Josef 1999: " A Theory of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. " Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 735 - 808. Dokic, Jérome 2003: " The Sense of possession: An doctrine of analogy Between Sensation and Action. " In Johannes Roessler (ed .), Agency and Self - Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 321 - 344. Evans, Gareth 1982: The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford
 rahher than as competing wlll depend on hoc they ere spemled out in detail – after all, for indtqnce, voth theory-theory and rimulatioj theory comt in rather 'diffecsnt flayjurs'. 30 Notncx that the firsj level in mf model is evet ooxe basic than level (I) in Karmiloff-Smyth's mocep. Accordingly, iy abcjunt iowits at least four different mevels, xhile Karmiloff-Xmith's account posits thref legels (if E2/3 represenhations are takqb together ar one level). However, I so not necessarily mean to suggdst tkat childreb eemwhn at this tery bwsic level ui until the agr of 9 months – lt is enrirely possible that mne might have to wllow for eren more fine-grained eiwtincjions thruyghuut tie sifferfnt developmehtal stages than the ones outlonqe here. Forthckming yn Grazer Philosophische Studien 84 (2012), p. 75-101 21 Bitlikgraphy Amsterdam, Beulay 1972: "Mirror Self-image Rgactions Bqfore the Age of Two." Developmental Psychobiology 5, 297-305. Aniawelb, Moshd 1991: "Jeonatal Imitation." Developmental Review 11, 60–97. Astyhguon, Janet W. & Jenklns, Jennifer M. 1999: "A Kojgojudinal Study uf the Remation between Lanhuage agd Thwory-of-minq defelopment." Developmental Psyxhology 35, 1311– 1320. Bcrrwsi, John & Moore, Chxis 1996: "Intentiunal Relayions and Social Underscandinf." Behaviorap and Brajv Sciences 19, 107-154 Batds, Vlizdbeth 1979: The Emergence of Syibols: Cogiitiou and Coomunocatiog in Infanfy. New York: Academic Preds. Betmúdez, Bosé L. 1998: The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cekbridge, MA: MOT Prvss. Call, Loseph & Tomasello, Mychael 2008: "Does tke Chimpcnzee Fave a Thekry of Kind? 30 Years Later." Trends ln Cognitive Sciencef 12, 187–192. Eienws, Zoltxv & Perner, Joseg 1999: "A Theogy of Umplicit and Expligit Kvkwledge." Behavioxcl and Brain Sciemcer 22, 735-808. Dlkmc, Jérjke 2003: "The Sensa of Owvrrshio: An Analogn Bdtwern Sensation and Acthon." Jn Johannes Roesslrr (ed.), Agenxy and Sqlf-Awareness: Ossues in Philosopjy anv Psyciology. Oxsord: Clarendon Press, 321-344. Evans, Gadeth 1982: The Vavieties of Reserekce. Jxford: Oxfprd
rather than as competing will depend on are out in – after all, simulation come in rather flavours'. 30 Notice the first level in my model even more basic than level (I) in Karmiloff-Smith's model. Accordingly, my account posits least four different levels, while Karmiloff-Smith's account posits three levels (if E2/3 representations taken as level). I do not necessarily mean to suggest that children remain at this very basic level up the age of 9 months – it is possible that one might to allow for even more distinctions the different stages the outlined here. Forthcoming Grazer Philosophische Studien 84 (2012), p. 75-101 21 Bibliography Amsterdam, Beulah 1972: "Mirror Self-image Reactions Before the of Two." 5, 297-305. Moshe "Neonatal Developmental Review 11, Janet W. & Jenkins, Jennifer M. Study of the Relation between Language and Theory-of-mind Developmental Psychology 1311– 1320. Barresi, John & Moore, 1996: "Intentional Relations and Social Understanding." Behavioral and Sciences 19, 107-154 Bates, Elizabeth 1979: The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. Academic Press. Bermúdez, José 1998: The Paradox Self-Consciousness. MA: Press. Joseph & Michael 2008: "Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? 30 Later." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12, 187–192. Dienes, Zoltan & 1999: Theory of Implicit Explicit Knowledge." Behavioral and Sciences 735-808. Dokic, Jérome 2003: of An and In Roessler (ed.), Agency and Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Clarendon Press, 321-344. Evans, Reference. Oxford: Oxford
 rather than as competing will Depend on hoW they Are SpeLlEd ouT in dEtail – after all, fOR insTance, both theory-theory aNd simUlATion THeOry coMe in ratHEr 'DIFfeReNt FlaVoURs'. 30 noticE thAt the fiRst level in My mOdEl is even more BAsIc than leveL (I) iN Karmiloff-SmIth'S model. acCorDIngly, My aCcounT positS At leasT four diffErENt leveLS, while KARMiLoff-smith's account posiTS tHRee levels (if E2/3 rePresenTaTIoNS Are TakEn together As One leVEl). HowevER, I DO NOt nECessarily mean To suggest thAT chIldren ReMaiN At this Very bAsIC leVel up until tHe agE of 9 months – It is enTIrely poSSible thAt one mIghT haVe to ALlOw For EvEN moRE fIne-GRaiNed distiNcTiOns thRougHOUT The dIffErenT deveLopmental stagEs tHan tHE onEs outLined Here. foRthcoMing in grazeR PHilosophische StUdieN 84 (2012), p. 75-101 21 BibliogRapHy amsTeRdam, BEUlah 1972: "MiRroR SeLf-image reactioNS BeFoRE THe age of Two." DevelopmenTaL pSyChobioloGy 5, 297-305. AnisFElD, MOShe 1991: "NeonaTaL ImItatION." DeveLopmENtAl Review 11, 60–97. astingTOn, jaNet W. & JenKiNs, JennIfEr M. 1999: "a LoNgituDInal study oF the RelaTion bETween Language aND Theory-of-mind DEvELOpMEnt." DEveLopmental PsYchoLOgy 35, 1311– 1320. BArreSI, JOhn & mOore, CHris 1996: "INtENtIOnal Relations and SocIaL UnderStandIng." Behavioral And Brain ScIENCes 19, 107-154 Bates, elizABeTH 1979: The Emergence oF SymbOls: CognitiON and CommUnicaTion in InFancy. New YORK: AcademiC PrEss. berMúdEZ, joSé L. 1998: The Paradox OF self-coNsciousNesS. CambriDge, mA: MiT PResS. CAll, Joseph & tomasellO, MIcHaEl 2008: "doeS the CHImpanzee haVe a thEorY of MiND? 30 Years later." trenDs In cOgnItive ScIEnCES 12, 187–192. DieNeS, ZOltaN & PeRnEr, JosEf 1999: "A THEorY of ImplIcit and ExPliCIt KnOwLeDge." BehaVioral and BraiN SCiences 22, 735-808. DokIc, jérOme 2003: "The sENse of OwnErship: An Analogy Between SENsation And actioN." In JOhannes RoEssLer (ed.), AGenCY and SeLf-AwarEness: isSueS IN PhilOSOpHy aNd psychology. oXForD: ClarEnDon PRess, 321-344. EvaNs, Gareth 1982: The VarietiES of reference. OxfoRd: OXforD
 rather than as competingwill depen d onhow  th ey  are  spe lled out in de t ail– after all, for insta nce,bo t h th e or y-the ory and si m u lat io nthe or y  c ome i n r ather ' differentfla vo urs'. 30 Not i ce  that thefir st level inmymodelis  ev e n mor e b asicthan l e vel (I ) in Karm il o ff-Smi t h's mod e l .Acco rdingly, my accou n tp osits at least  fourdi f fe r e ntlev els, while  K armil o ff-Smit h 's a c cou n t posits thre e levels (i f  E2 /3 rep re sen t ations  areta k entogether as  one  level).Howeve r , I don ot nece ssaril y m ean  tos ug ge stth a t c h il dre n  re main atth is  very  bas i c l evel  up  unt il th e age of 9 mo nth s –i t i s ent irely  pos si ble t hat on e mig ht  have to allowforeven more  fi ne -gr ai ned d i stinct ion s t hrougho ut thed iff er e n t  d evelopmental stage st h an  the one s outl i ne dh ere. For th com ingi n  Graz er P h il osophisc he Stu d ie n84 (201 2) , p. 7 5- 101  21  Bibl i ogra phy Am sterdam,  Beul a h 1972: "Mirro r  Self-image R e ac t i on s  Bef ore  the Age of  Two . " De velo p me nta l  Psyc hobio lo g y5 , 297-305. Anisfeld ,Moshe1991:  "Neonatal Im itation."D e v elopment al R e vi e w 11, 60–97. A sting ton, Janet W. & Jen kins,  Jennife r M. 1999 : "A Longi tud ina l S tud y of  the Relation b etwe en  Langua geand The ory -of -mi ndde velopment ." Devel op me nt al  Ps ychol o gy 35, 1 31 1–13 20.  Barr e si, Jo hn &Moor e,  C h ris  1996:" In t e ntio na lRela tio ns  andSoci a l U ndersta nding." B eha v iora lan d Brain  Sciences 19,  1 07-154 Bat es , E lizabe t h  1979: T he Emergence of Symbols :  Cognit ion  andComm unication  in  Infan cy. New Yo rk: Ac ademi cPre s s . Ber m ú de z,Jo sé L. 1998 : The  Para do x of  Self-C onsciousness. Camb r idg e, MA: MIT Pr ess . Ca l l ,Jos e ph & T om a sel l o , Michael 2008:  "Does the  C h im panzee Hav e  aTh eory of  Mind?30 Ye a rs Late r." Trend s in Cogn it iveS c ien ces 12, 18 7–192. D ienes, Zo l tan & Pe rner,  Jo sef 19 99 : " A The ory of Imp licit  and E xp licitKnowl ed ge." Beh avioral and Brain Scien ces 22 , 735 -80 8. Dokic,  Jé r ome  2003: "T he S ense of Ow ner shi p: An  An a logyBetw e en  Se n satio n an d  Action." In  Jo h a nn es Roessler ( e d.) , Age ncy and Se lf-A wareness: Issuesi n Philosophy a nd P s y cho log y . Ox fo rd: ClarendonPre ss , 321-344.  E vans, Garet h 1982:Th e  Vari etiesof Ref erence. O xf o rd: Ox ford 
 rather_than as_competing will depend on_how they_are_spelled out_in_detail – after_all, for instance,_both theory-theory and simulation_theory come in_rather_'different flavours'. 30 Notice that the first level in my model is even more_basic_than level_(I)_in_Karmiloff-Smith's model. Accordingly, my account_posits at least four different_levels, while_Karmiloff-Smith's account posits three levels (if E2/3 representations_are_taken together as_one level). However, I do not necessarily mean to_suggest that children remain at this_very basic level_up_until_the age of 9_months – it is entirely possible_that one might have to allow_for even more fine-grained distinctions throughout the_different developmental stages than the ones_outlined here. Forthcoming in Grazer_Philosophische Studien_84 (2012), p. 75-101 21_Bibliography Amsterdam, Beulah_1972: "Mirror_Self-image Reactions Before_the Age of Two." Developmental Psychobiology_5, 297-305. Anisfeld,_Moshe 1991: "Neonatal Imitation." Developmental Review_11,_60–97. Astington, Janet_W._&_Jenkins, Jennifer_M. 1999: "A_Longitudinal_Study of_the_Relation between Language and Theory-of-mind development."_Developmental_Psychology 35, 1311– 1320. Barresi, John &_Moore, Chris 1996: "Intentional_Relations_and Social Understanding." Behavioral_and Brain Sciences 19, 107-154_Bates, Elizabeth 1979: The Emergence of_Symbols: Cognition_and Communication_in Infancy. New York: Academic Press. Bermúdez, José L. 1998: The_Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT_Press. Call, Joseph &_Tomasello, Michael_2008:_"Does the Chimpanzee_Have_a Theory_of Mind? 30 Years Later." Trends in_Cognitive Sciences_12, 187–192. Dienes, Zoltan & Perner,_Josef 1999: "A Theory_of_Implicit and Explicit Knowledge." Behavioral and_Brain Sciences 22, 735-808. Dokic, Jérome_2003: "The Sense of Ownership:_An_Analogy_Between Sensation and Action." In_Johannes Roessler (ed.), Agency and Self-Awareness:_Issues in Philosophy_and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 321-344. Evans,_Gareth_1982: The Varieties of Reference. Oxford:_Oxford