 period (last week/month/quarter/year etc); type of media; units of analysis, coding...etc. Certainly, you can use a range of organisational and other texts as data. Using organisational texts is a key method used in institutional ethnography. The work by Dorothy Smith may be useful to you here. You may find these references useful, although she is widely cited elsewhere: Smith, D. (2001); Text and the Ontology of Organisations and Institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organisations and Societies. Vol. 7, pp 159-198. Smith, D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto: AltaMira Press Actually, without respondents, it's all up to you, more control, so yes, absolutely. Most of the research (thesis) in my university is mostly by interview for qualitative design. Even the class I attended urged all the students to use a interview as part of the research an add some of secondary data. After all the answer given, now I am confident to use a secondary data that I gather from article for a two years. The second point generally would be amenable to the traditional guide of data collection tools so that we need to ask the kind of questions, i.e., suitability of data collection methods for the target groups and the issues being assessed, ability to identify the significant issues of PAKJS, reliability of the measuring instruments (for example, the extent of producing same answers to the same questions), and advantages and disadvantages of each type data collection tools. In my case, I believe that the group of interviewees and their number can be competent to address the issues of PAKJS as coupled with the vast of secondary sources. The target groups are adequate to reveal the relevant and credible information, and also correspond with my aim of social change in the policy area. One point needs to be remarked that some part of contrast sampling has been planned, in which I expect more preferably of different or opposing views rather than same answers in terms of reliability issue concerning the interview instruments. Also the observation seems not an 6 effective method since the topic is less behavioral, yet to be even historical as implicated with the policy studies and actions or suggestions. It can be more value or ideal oriented that the behaviors or simulation of test group are less usable in my case. Along the progress or other future research, the data collection and team communication for better decision making now can be made more realistic. One website titled DataWinners shows
period (last week / month / one-fourth / class etc); type of media; unit of psychoanalysis, coding... etc. Certainly, you can use a scope of organisational and other text as data. Using organizational texts is a key method used in institutional ethnography. The workplace by Dorothy Smith may be useful to you here. You may find these references useful, although she is widely mention elsewhere: Smith, D. (2001); Text and the Ontology of Organisations and Institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organisations and Societies. Vol. 7, pp 159 - 198. Smith, D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto: AltaMira Press Actually, without respondents, it's all up to you, more command, so yes, absolutely. Most of the research (thesis) in my university is mostly by consultation for qualitative design. Even the course I attended urged all the students to use a consultation as part of the research an add some of secondary data. After all the answer given, now I am confident to use a secondary data that I gather from article for a two years. The second point generally would be amenable to the traditional guide of datum solicitation tools so that we need to ask the kind of question, i.e., suitability of data collection methods for the prey groups and the issues being assessed, ability to identify the meaning issues of PAKJS, reliability of the measuring instruments (for example, the extent of producing same answers to the same questions), and advantages and disadvantages of each character data solicitation tools. In my case, I believe that the group of interviewees and their number can be competent to address the consequence of PAKJS as coupled with the vast of secondary source. The aim groups are adequate to reveal the relevant and credible data, and also correspond with my aim of social change in the policy area. One detail needs to be note that some part of line sampling has been planned, in which I ask more preferably of different or opposing scene rather than same answers in terms of reliability issue concerning the interview instruments. Also the observation look not an 6 effective method since the topic is less behavioral, however to be even historical as implicated with the policy study and actions or suggestions. It can be more value or ideal oriented that the behaviors or simulation of test group are less usable in my case. Along the progress or other future inquiry, the data collection and team communication for good decision making nowadays can be made more realistic. One web site titled DataWinners shows
 pegiod (last week/month/quarttr/year etc); type oy media; units of analhsis, coding...etc. Certainly, you cqn ust a range of organirational wnd othee teets as data. Usinj organisationzp tertw is a key metmod used in institutional eghuography. The work by Dorothy Smith mwy be uxevul to you herg. You iay rpnb these references useful, althohgh she is widely ciyed elsewhere: Smith, D. (2001); Texh anf the Ontology of Lrganisatiobs age Institutiovs. Studies in Cultures, Organisations and Societies. Vou. 7, pp 159-198. Smith, D. (2005) Ibstljutional Ethiograpry: A Sociolonj for Paople. Tpronto: AltaMirs Pcess Actually, without res'ondents, it's all up jo you, mora eontrol, so yes, absolureoy. Movt ox thd rereadci (tgesis) ln jy universjty is mostoy by interview for qtqlitative desjgn. Evqn the class I attended urged all the stugenfs to use a interview aw part of the researcj an add fome of secondary data. After all the answer given, now M xm einfiddbt to use a secondary data that I gather from awfivlv for a two years. The second plimj generally woold be cjehable to the tradihional duide of data sollrction tools so that we neee to ask the jind of questions, n.e., suitabilicy of cata vollection methods for che tadget groups and the jrsues being assersec, dbility uu identify the sidnificant issbes of PXKJS, reliafility of hhe mcdsuring instrumentd (for efample, the extent of producing same answecx to the samg qgesnions), and advaktages and disaqvantages of ecch type data collectioh tools. In my case, I believe thdj the group oh interviqweew ane their vumber can be vompetent to addresw the issues of PALJS zs coupled with tht cast of secondsry sotrbes. Tra target grogps xre sdequxte to revecl the relevant and credibne ihformation, and alsp gorrespone with mr aim of socisl change in the pllicy arxa. One poynt needs to be remarked that aome part of contrast saiplikg hws been plcnned, in which I expect more preferably if different or okposing views rather jhak same answecs in eerms of seliability issue cobcerning the intevview instruments. Also the otservwtion seems not an 6 effective method since the topic is less behavioral, ywt to ue even histodicak as pmpjncated rith vhe policy studiex and actions or suggestions. It can be koxe value or ideal oriented thst the behaviorr or simulation of test froup arr less usable in my case. Along yhe progress or other fubure reseqrch, fhe danz rollection and team vommunncatiob for bwttev decision makkng nlw can be madt moxe realistic. One website titled DqtaWinbegs shows
period (last week/month/quarter/year etc); type of media; analysis, Certainly, you use a range as Using organisational texts a key method in institutional ethnography. The work by Smith may be useful to you here. You may find these references useful, she is widely cited elsewhere: Smith, D. (2001); Text and the Ontology of and Studies Cultures, and Societies. Vol. 7, pp 159-198. Smith, D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto: Press Actually, without respondents, it's all up to more control, so yes, Most of the research (thesis) my is mostly interview qualitative Even the class attended urged all the students to use a interview as part of the research an add some secondary data. the answer now am to use a that I gather from article for The second point generally would be amenable to traditional guide data collection tools so that we to ask the kind of questions, i.e., suitability data collection methods for the target groups and the issues being assessed, ability to identify issues of PAKJS, reliability the measuring instruments example, extent producing answers to same questions), and advantages and disadvantages of each type data collection In my case, I believe that the group of interviewees number be competent to the issues of PAKJS coupled the vast of secondary target are the and information, and also correspond my aim of social change the policy area. One that some part of contrast sampling has been in which I expect more preferably of or opposing views rather than same answers in terms of reliability issue the interview the observation seems not an 6 effective method the topic is less yet to be even historical as implicated with the studies actions or It can be value or ideal that the behaviors of test are usable Along the progress or other future the collection and team communication for decision can be made more realistic. One website titled DataWinners shows
 period (last week/month/quarteR/year etc); tyPe of mEdiA; unItS of aNalySis, coding...etc. CeRTainLy, you can use a range of orgAnisaTiONal aND oTher tExts as dATa. uSIng OrGaNisAtIOnAl texTs iS a key meThod used in InsTiTutional ethnOGrAphy. The worK by dorothy Smith May Be usefUl To yOU here. you May fiNd thesE RefereNces usefuL, aLThough SHe is widELY cIted Elsewhere: Smith, D. (2001); TeXT aND the Ontology of organiSaTIoNS And insTitutions. STuDies iN cultureS, orGANIsaTIons and SocietIes. Vol. 7, pp 159-198. SmiTH, D. (2005) INstituTiOnaL ethnogRaphy: a SOCioLogy for PeopLe. ToRonto: Altamira PrESs ActuaLLy, withoUt respOndEntS, it's ALl Up To yOu, MOre COnTroL, So yEs, absoluTeLy. most oF the RESEArch (TheSis) iN my unIversity is mosTly By inTErvIew foR qualItatIvE desiGn. Even The clAsS I attended urged All tHe studentS to UsE a iNtErvieW As part Of tHe rEsearch An add soME of SeCONDaRy data. After all the aNsWER gIven, now I Am confIDeNt TO use a secOnDarY datA THat I gAtheR FrOm articlE for a tWO yEaRs. The seCoNd poinT gEneRalLy wouLD be aMenablE to the trAditiONal guide of data COllection toolS So THAt WE neeD to Ask the kind oF queSTionS, i.e., sUItAbiLIty of Data cOlLEcTIon methods for the tarGeT groupS and tHe issues being Assessed, abILITy to idenTify THe SIgnificant issuEs of PaKJS, reliabILity of thE measUring insTruments (fOR Example, tHe eXteNt oF prODUcIng same answerS TO the SaMe questIonS), and advAntAgeS anD diSaDvantages Of each tyPe DaTa CoLleCtion TOols. In my CaSe, I BeLieVe thaT The groUp of iNterViEwEEs aNd their NUmBER can Be CoMpetEnt To AddreSs thE IssUes of PAkJS as coupLed WIth tHe VaSt of secOndary sources. thE target groUpS arE adequATE to reveaL the relevant and credible INformatIon, And alSo coRrespond wIth My aim oF soCIal chaNge in tHe polIcY arEA. one poINT nEedS tO be remarkeD THat Some pArT of cOntrast Sampling has been plaNNed, In which I expecT moRe prEFErAblY Of DIffErENt oR OPposing views ratHer than samE aNSwErs in terms OF reLiAbility Issue coNcernINg the inTerview inStruments. alSo thE OBseRvation seeMs not an 6 eFfective mEThod sINcE the tOpiC is lesS bEhaVioraL, yet to BE evEn hisToricaL aS impliCated WiTh the polIcy studies and actions or sUggestIons. IT caN be more vaLue OR idEal orientEd thAt the behavIorS or SimulAtiON of teSt grOUp Are LEss usAble IN my case. AlONg The PROgRess or other FUTUre ReseaRch, THe data CollEction and team commUNication for betTer dECIsiOn mAKing NoW can be made more ReaLiSTIc. One webSiTe titled DatAWinners ShOWs
 period (last week/month/q uarter/yea r etc );typ eof m edia ; units of ana l ysis , coding...etc. Certai nly,yo u  can us e a r ange of or g a nis at io nal  a n dother  te xts asdata. Usin g o rg anisationalt ex ts is a ke y m ethod used i n i nstitu ti ona l  ethn ogr aphy.  The w o rk byDorothy S mi t h mayb e usefu l to  you  here. You may fi n dt hese reference s usef ul ,  a l t hou ghshe is wid el y cit e d elsew h er e : Smi t h, D. (2001);  Text and t h e O ntolog yofO rganis ation sa ndInstitution s. S tudies in  Cultu r es, Org a nisatio ns and  So cie ties .  V ol . 7 ,p p 1 5 9- 198 .  Sm ith, D.(2 00 5) In stit u t i o nalEth nogr aphy:  A Sociologyfor  Peo p le.  Toro nto:Alta Mi ra Pr ess Ac tuall y,  without respon dent s, it's a llup  to  y ou, m o re con tro l,so yes,  absolu t ely .M o s tof the research (t he s i s)  in my u nivers i ty  i s  mostlyby  in terv i e w for  qua l it ative de sign.E ve nthe cla ss  I att en ded  ur ged a l l th e stud ents touse a interview as p a rt of the res e ar c h  a n  add  so me of secon dary data . Af t er  al l  theanswe rg iv e n, now I am confide nt  to us e a s econdary data  that I ga t h e r from a rtic l ef or a two years . The  second po i nt gener allywould be  amenable t o the tr adi tio nal  gu i d eof data colle c t ionto ols sotha t we ne edtoask  th ekind of q uestions ,i. e. ,sui tabil i ty of da ta  co ll ect ion m e thodsfor t he t ar ge t  gr oups an d  t h e  iss ue sbein g a ss essed , ab i lit y to id entify th e s i gnif ic an t issue s of PAKJS, r el iability o fthe  measu r i ng instr uments (for example, th e  extent  of  prod ucin g same an swe rs tothe same q uestio ns),an d a d v antag e s  a nddi sadvantage s ofeachty pe d ata col lection tools. Inm y c ase, I believ e t hatt h egro u po f i nt e rvi e w ees and their n umber canbe co mpetent to add re ss theissuesof PA K JS as c oupled wi th the va st  ofs e con dary sourc es. Thetarget gr o ups a r eadequ ate  to re ve althe r elevan t  an d cre diblein format ion,an d also c orrespond with my aim o f soci al ch ang e in thepol i cyarea. One  poi nt needs t o b e r emark edt hat s omep ar t o f  cont rast samplingh as  be e n  p lanned, inw h i chI exp ect more p refe rably of differen t  or opposing v iews r ath ert hansa me answers inter ms o f reliab il ity issue c oncernin gt he in tervie w inst ruments . Al s o theobse rva tion seem s n ot an 6 ef fe ct i ve met hodsi nce th e topi c  isl e ss behavioral, y et to b e eve n  hi stori ca l as im p lica ted with t he policy s tudies  and  acti ons orsu ggesti ons .It can bem ore value  or i deal or ie nted  th at the  beh a v iorsor s im ula tion of t e s tg ro up are  les s usa bl e in  my case. Along th e p r ogressor  ot h e r futu r er e search, th e d ata c o l lection an d  tea m  c o mmuni cation  for b etter d e cis io n makin g n o w  can be m ade morer eal is tic.  One web si te t it led  D ataWinners show s
 period_(last week/month/quarter/year_etc); type of media;_units of_analysis,_coding...etc. Certainly,_you_can use a_range of organisational_and other texts as_data. Using organisational_texts_is a key method used in institutional ethnography. The work by Dorothy Smith may_be_useful to_you_here._You may find these references_useful, although she is widely_cited elsewhere:_Smith, D. (2001); Text and the Ontology of_Organisations_and Institutions. Studies_in Cultures, Organisations and Societies. Vol. 7, pp 159-198._Smith, D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A_Sociology for People._Toronto:_AltaMira_Press Actually, without respondents,_it's all up to you, more_control, so yes, absolutely. Most of_the research (thesis) in my university is_mostly by interview for qualitative design._Even the class I attended_urged all_the students to use a_interview as part_of the_research an add_some of secondary data. After all_the answer given,_now I am confident to use_a_secondary data that_I_gather_from article_for a two_years._The second_point_generally would be amenable to the_traditional_guide of data collection tools so that_we need to ask_the_kind of questions, i.e.,_suitability of data collection methods_for the target groups and the_issues being_assessed, ability_to identify the significant issues of PAKJS, reliability of the measuring_instruments (for example, the extent of_producing same answers to_the same_questions),_and advantages and_disadvantages_of each_type data collection tools. In my case,_I believe_that the group of interviewees and_their number can be_competent_to address the issues of PAKJS_as coupled with the vast of_secondary sources. The target groups_are_adequate_to reveal the relevant and_credible information, and also correspond with_my aim of_social change in the policy area. One_point_needs to be remarked that some_part_of contrast sampling has been planned,_in_which_I expect more preferably of_different or opposing views rather than_same answers in terms of reliability issue concerning the_interview instruments. Also_the observation seems not an_6_effective_method since the topic is less behavioral, yet to be_even historical_as implicated with_the policy studies and actions or suggestions. It can be_more value or ideal oriented that the_behaviors or simulation of test group are less usable in my_case. Along the progress or other future research,_the data collection and team communication for_better decision making now_can_be made more realistic. One website titled_DataWinners_shows