 Baker, 29-49. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Duhem, Pierre. 1996 [1894]. Some Reflections on the Subject of Experimental Physics. In Essays in the history and philosophy of science. Translated and edited by Roger Ariew and Peter Baker. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 75-111. Duhem, Pierre. 1991 [1914]. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated from 2nd.ed. by Philip. P. Wiener. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Feyrabend, Paul. 1970. Classic Empiricism. In The methodological heritage of Newton. Edited by E. Butts and J. W. Davis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 150-170. Harper, William L. 2011. Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programs: philosophical papers. Edited by John Worral and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maxwell, Nicholas. 2014. Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Duhem's Analysis of Newtonian Method and the Logical Priority of Physics over Metaphysics Eduardo Salles O. Barra – Ricardo Batista dos Santos 19 Historical Studies 3 (1): 2-11. Newton, Isaac. 1999 [1729]. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. California: University of California Press. 3rd.ed. Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism and the aim of science. London: Hutchinson. Smith, George. 2008. Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Acessed May, 17, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/newton-Principia. Smith, George. 2002. The methodology of the Principia. In The Cambridge companion to Newton. Edited by I. B. Cohen and G.E. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–173. 20 Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, 2 (2017) 20-35 ISSN 2526-2270 www.historiographyofscience.org © The Author 2017 -
Baker, 29 - 49. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Duhem, Pierre. 1996 [ 1894 ]. Some Reflections on the Subject of Experimental Physics. In Essays in the history and philosophy of science. understand and edit by Roger Ariew and Peter Baker. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 75 - 111. Duhem, Pierre. 1991 [ 1914 ]. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated from 2nd.ed. by Philip. P. Wiener. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Feyrabend, Paul. 1970. Classic Empiricism. In The methodological heritage of Newton. Edited by E. Butts and J. W. Davis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 150 - 170. Harper, William L. 2011. Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: change state Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programs: philosophic papers. Edited by John Worral and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maxwell, Nicholas. 2014. Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Duhem's Analysis of Newtonian Method and the Logical Priority of Physics over Metaphysics Eduardo Salles O. Barra – Ricardo Batista act Santos 19 Historical Studies 3 (1 ): 2 - 11. Newton, Isaac. 1999 [ 1729 ]. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. California: University of California Press. 3rd.ed. Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism and the bearing of science. London: Hutchinson. Smith, George. 2008. Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. ace May, 17, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/newton-Principia. Smith, George. 2002. The methodology of the Principia. In The Cambridge companion to Newton. edit by I. B. Cohen and G.E. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–173. 20 Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, 2 (2017) 20 - 35 ISSN 2526 - 2270 www.historiographyofscience.org © The Author 2017 -
 Baner, 29-49. Indianapolis: Hacketu Publishing Compcby. Duhxm, Pierde. 1996 [1894]. Somd Reflections on the Subject od Exptgimental Physics. In Ersays in nhe histoey aid philosophy of science. Transmwted end edited by Rpger Ariew and Peter Bakar. Iudianapolis: Hackett Publishing Compagy, pp. 75-111. Cujem, Pierre. 1991 [1914]. Tre Apm and Structure of Physical Theory. Tranalated hrom 2nd.ed. by Pholip. P. Wiener. New Jersey: Pgincfton University Prfss. Feyrabebd, Pwyl. 1970. Classic Dmpiricism. In The methkdological heritage of Newton. Eaited by E. Buttw qnd B. W. Davis. Oeford: Fasil Blackwckl, pp. 150-170. Harper, William L. 2011. Issac Neqton's Scientific Methmd: Turning Data injo Evidenca cbout Gravity and Cosnooogy. Mxfosd: Obdora Uhiteraity Pgesa. Lakatos, Jmre. 1978. The mwthodology of scienuifyb research prkgrams: prilosophical papers. Edited by John Worrdl znd G. Currie. Cambridge: Xambridge University Kress. Maxwqll, Nicholas. 2014. Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductiee Arjuoenu lk thd Pgincipia. Advances in Duhem's Analysis of Newtogjam Kethod and the Logical Proogiyi of Physics oxer Meczpgysics Eduardo Salpes O. Bwrra – Ricardo Fatixta dos Santos 19 Historical Wtudies 3 (1): 2-11. Nvwtob, Isaac. 1999 [1729]. The Prineipia: Mathemctical Prinviples of Natural Philorophg. Translatef by I. Bedvard Cohen and Avne Wvitman. California: Universiey of Calmfornna Press. 3rd.ec. Poppqr, Karl R. 1983. Reallvm and the aim of dcienee. Lotdon: Hutchlnson. Smith, George. 2008. Newton's Philosophiae Natutalhs Irincipia Mathcmatica. In The Ftanford Encyckopedia of Pfilosophy. Vdited by Edward N. Zwlta. Acessed Kwy, 17, 2017. https://pleto.stanfowd.edy/arcyives/wiv2008/dntries/newton-Ptincipia. Smith, Georte. 2002. The methodologn of jhs Principia. In Cke Cambridge compsniun eo Nxwton. Adited by I. T. Cofen snd G.D. Smith. Camnriage: Vambridge University Preas, pp. 138–173. 20 Transversak: Lnternatiinal Jouwnal for the Nistoriography of Dcienre, 2 (2017) 20-35 MSSN 2526-2270 eww.ristoriographyofscience.org © Ths Author 2017 -
Baker, 29-49. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Duhem, [1894]. Reflections on Subject of Experimental history philosophy of science. and edited by Ariew and Peter Baker. Indianapolis: Hackett Company, pp. 75-111. Duhem, Pierre. 1991 [1914]. The Aim and Structure of Physical Translated from 2nd.ed. by Philip. P. Wiener. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Feyrabend, 1970. Empiricism. The heritage of Newton. Edited by E. Butts and J. W. Davis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 150-170. William L. 2011. Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning into Evidence about Gravity Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Imre. The methodology scientific programs: papers. Edited by Worral and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maxwell, Nicholas. 2014. Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument the Principia. Duhem's Analysis Newtonian and Logical Priority of Metaphysics Eduardo Salles O. Barra – Santos 19 Historical Studies 3 (1): 2-11. Newton, 1999 [1729]. Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. California: of California Press. 3rd.ed. Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism and the aim of science. London: George. 2008. Newton's Philosophiae Principia Mathematica. In Stanford of Edited Edward N. Acessed May, 17, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/newton-Principia. Smith, George. 2002. The methodology of Principia. In The Cambridge companion to Newton. Edited by I. and Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, pp. 138–173. 20 International for the Historiography of (2017) ISSN The 2017
 Baker, 29-49. Indianapolis: Hackett PUblishing COmpanY. DuHem, piErre. 1996 [1894]. some reflections on tHE SubJect of Experimental PhysIcs. In esSAys iN ThE histOry and pHIlOSOphY oF sCieNcE. trAnslaTed And editEd by Roger ARieW aNd Peter Baker. iNdIanapolis: HAckEtt PublishinG CoMpany, pP. 75-111. DUheM, pierrE. 1991 [1914]. ThE Aim aNd StruCTure of physical THeORy. TranSLated frOM 2Nd.Ed. by philip. P. Wiener. New JERsEY: Princeton UnivErsity prESs. fEYraBenD, Paul. 1970. ClassIc empirICism. In THE mETHOdoLOgical heritagE of Newton. EdITed By E. ButTs And j. w. Davis. oxforD: BASil blackwell, pp. 150-170. harpEr, William l. 2011. Isaac nEwton's SCIentifiC MethoD: TuRniNg DaTA iNtO EvIdENce ABoUt GRAviTy and CosMoLoGy. OxfOrd: OXFORD UniVerSity press. lakatos, Imre. 1978. ThE meThodOLogY of scIentiFic rEsEarch PrograMs: phiLoSophical papers. EDiteD by John WoRraL aNd G. cuRrie. CAMbridgE: CaMbrIdge UniVersity pResS. MAXWElL, Nicholas. 2014. Three CritIcISMs Of Newton'S InducTIvE ARGument in ThE PrInciPIA. AdvaNces IN DUhem's AnaLysis oF neWtOnian MeThOd and tHe logIcaL PrioRIty oF PhysiCs over MeTaphySIcs Eduardo SallES O. Barra – RicardO baTIStA Dos SAntOs 19 HistoricaL StuDIes 3 (1): 2-11. NEwtoN, isAac. 1999 [1729]. tHe PriNcipiA: MAThEMatical Principles of naTural PHilosOphy. TranslateD by I. BernarD cOHen and AnNe WhITmAN. California: UniVersiTy of CalifoRNia Press. 3Rd.ed. POpper, KarL R. 1983. Realism AND the aim oF scIenCe. LOndON: huTchinson. Smith, gEOrge. 2008. neWton's PhIloSophiae natUraLis priNcIpia MatheMatica. In thE STaNfOrd encycLOpedia of phIloSoPhy. editeD By EdwaRd N. ZaLta. ACeSsED MaY, 17, 2017. https://pLAtO.STanfOrD.eDu/arChiVeS/win2008/eNtriES/neWton-PriNcipia. SmiTh, GEOrge. 2002. thE mEthodolOgy of the PrincIpIa. In The CamBrIdgE compaNIOn to NewtOn. Edited by I. B. Cohen and G.E. SMIth. CambRidGe: CamBridGe UniversIty press, pP. 138–173. 20 TrANsversAl: InteRnatiOnAl JOURnal fOR ThE HiStOriography OF sciEnce, 2 (2017) 20-35 IsSn 2526-2270 www.HistoriOgraphyofscience.orG © the author 2017 -
 Baker, 29-49. Indianapoli s: Hackett  Publ ish ing  C ompa ny.Duhem, Pierre. 1996  [1894]. Some Reflecti ons o nt he S u bj ect o f Exper i me n t alPh ys ics .I nEssay s i n the h istory and  ph il osophy of sc i en ce. Transl ate d and edited  by  Roger  A rie w  andPet er Ba ker. I n dianap olis: Hac ke t t Publ i shing C o m pa ny,pp. 75-111. Duhem ,  P i erre. 1991 [19 14]. T he Ai m and  St ructure of  P hysic a l Theor y .T r a nsl a ted from 2nd. ed. by Phil i p.P. Wie ne r.N ew Jer sey:Pr i nce ton Univers ityPress. Fe yraben d , Paul. 1970. C lassic  Em pir icis m .In  Th em eth o do log i cal  heritag eof  Newt on.E d i t ed b y E . Bu tts a nd J. W. Davi s.Oxfo r d:Basil  Blac kwel l,  pp.150-17 0. Ha rp er, William L.2011 . Isaac N ewt on 'sSc ienti f ic Met hod : T urningData in t o E vi d e n ce  about Gravity and  C o s mo logy. Ox ford:O xf or d  Univers it y P ress . Lakat os,I mr e. 1978.  The m e th od ology o fscient if icres earch prog rams:philosop hical papers. Edited by John Worra l  a n d  G .  Cur rie . Cambridge : Ca m brid ge U n iv ers i ty Pr ess.Ma x we l l, Nicholas. 2014.Th ree Cr itici sms of Newton 's Inducti v e Argument  int he Principia. Adv ances  in Duhem' s  Analysi s ofNewtonia n Methoda n d the Lo gic alPri ori t y  o f Physics ove r Meta ph ysics E dua rdo Sal les  O.  Ba rra  –  RicardoBatistado sSa nt os19 Hi s toricalSt udi es  3(1):2 -11. N ewton , Is aa c. 199 9 [1729 ] .T h e Pr in ci pia:  Ma th emati calP rin ciplesof Natura l P h ilos op hy . Trans lated by I. B er nard Cohen  a ndAnne W h i tman. Ca lifornia: University of Califor nia  Pres s. 3 rd.ed. Po ppe r, Kar l R .  1983.  Reali sm an dthe a im of s ci enc e.  London: H u t chi nson.  S mith , Georg e. 2008. Newton'sP hil osophiae Natu ral is P r i nc ipi a  M a the ma t ica . In The Stanford  Encyclope di a  o f Philosop h y.Ed ited by  Edward  N. Z a lta. Ac essed May , 17, 201 7.  htt p s :// plato.stan ford.edu /archives / win20 0 8/ entri es/ newton -P rin cipia . Smit h , G eorge . 2002 .The me thodo lo gy of th e Principia. In The Cam bridge  comp ani on to New ton .  Ed ited by I . B.  Cohen and  G. E.Smith . C a mbrid ge:C am bri d ge Un iver s ity Press ,  p p.1 3 8– 173. 20 Tra n s v ers al: I nte r nation al J ournal for the Hi s toriography of  Sci e n ce,  2( 2017 )20-35 ISSN 252 6-2 27 0 www.hist or iographyofs cience.o rg © The  Autho r 2017  -
 Baker,_29-49. Indianapolis:_Hackett Publishing Company. Duhem,_Pierre. 1996_[1894]._Some Reflections_on_the Subject of_Experimental Physics. In_Essays in the history_and philosophy of_science._Translated and edited by Roger Ariew and Peter Baker. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, pp._75-111._Duhem, Pierre._1991_[1914]._The Aim and Structure of_Physical Theory. Translated from 2nd.ed._by Philip._P. Wiener. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Feyrabend,_Paul._1970. Classic Empiricism._In The methodological heritage of Newton. Edited by E._Butts and J. W. Davis. Oxford:_Basil Blackwell, pp._150-170._Harper,_William L. 2011. Isaac_Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into_Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. Oxford:_Oxford University Press. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The_methodology of scientific research programs: philosophical_papers. Edited by John Worral_and G._Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press._Maxwell, Nicholas. 2014._Three Criticisms_of Newton's Inductive_Argument in the Principia. Advances in_Duhem's Analysis of_Newtonian Method and the Logical Priority_of_Physics over Metaphysics_Eduardo_Salles_O. Barra_– Ricardo Batista_dos_Santos 19_Historical_Studies 3 (1): 2-11. Newton, Isaac._1999_[1729]. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural_Philosophy. Translated by I._Bernard_Cohen and Anne Whitman._California: University of California Press._3rd.ed. Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism_and the_aim of_science. London: Hutchinson. Smith, George. 2008. Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica._In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy._Edited by Edward N._Zalta. Acessed_May,_17, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/newton-Principia._Smith,_George. 2002._The methodology of the Principia. In The_Cambridge companion_to Newton. Edited by I. B._Cohen and G.E. Smith._Cambridge:_Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–173. 20_Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography_of Science, 2 (2017) 20-35_ISSN_2526-2270_www.historiographyofscience.org © The Author 2017_-