 87 **.4 39 **.2 08 **.1 94 **.3 27 ** LI TA 3. 46 1. 22 5.8 09 1.3 89 **.3 47 **.3 62 **.3 55 ** PA D W 3. 17 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 **.2 68 **.2 16 ** N PA S 3. 94 1. 07 6.8 20 1.3 96 **.4 00 ** N TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20 1.3 54 ** N TE N 3. 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1 N ot es : * *C or re la tio n is si gn ifi ca nt a t t he 0.0 1 le ve l ( 2ta ile d). TA A D = te am w or k ad ju st m en t a nx ie ty d is or de r; N C M D = n o co m pe te nc e de ve lo pm en t; PA D T = ps yc ho so ci al a dj us tm en t d is or de r in te am ; T EC N = te am c on fli ct ; L IT A = le ss in di vi du al is m in ta sk a cq ui si tio n; P A D W = p sy ch os oc ia l a dj us tm en t d is or de r a t w or kp la ce ; N PA S = ne ga tiv e ps yc ho so ci al a dj us tm en t s ki lls ; N TE Q = n eg at iv e te am le ad er e xp er ie nc e an d qu al ifi ca tio n; N TE N = n eg at iv e te am w or k em be dd ed ne ss. The influence of psychosocial adjustment factors on team embeddedness 323 To reduce and structure detection of variables PC analysis, utilising varimax with Kaiser normalisation rotation method was employed to identify variables from the coherent independent subset. The factorability of the items was examined and the analysis of data extracted from heavy loadings, exploratory factors also measured by confirmatory factor analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was.901 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant ( 2(903) = 21,082.02, p <
87 * * .4 39 * * .2 08 * * .1 94 * * .3 27 * * LI TA 3. 46 1. 22 5.8 09 1.3 89 * * .3 47 * * .3 62 * * .3 55 * * PA D W 3. 17 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 * * .2 68 * * .2 16 * * N PA S 3. 94 1. 07 6.8 20 1.3 96 * * .4 00 * * N TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20 1.3 54 * * N TE N 3. 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1 N ot es: * * C or re la tio n is si gn ifi ca nt a t metric ton helium 0.0 1 le ve l (2ta ile d). TA A D = te am w or k ad ju st m en t a nx ie ty d is or delaware r; N C M D = n o co m pe te nc e de ve lo pm en t; PA D T = ps yc ho indeed ci al a dj us tm en t d is or de r in te americium; T EC N = te am c on fli ct; L information technology A = le ss in di vi du al is thousand in ta sk a cq ui si tio n; P A D W = phosphorus sy ch os oc ia l a dj us tm en t d is or de r a t w or kp la ce; N PA S = ne ga tiv e ps yc ho therefore ci al a dj us tm en t s ki lls; N TE Q = n eg at iv e te am le ad er e xp er ie nc e an d qu al ifi ca tio n; N TE N = n eg at iv e te am w or k em be dd ed ne ss. The influence of psychosocial adjustment factors on team embeddedness 323 To shrink and structure detection of variables personal computer analysis, utilising varimax with Kaiser standardization rotation method was hire to identify variable from the coherent independent subset. The factorability of the items was examined and the psychoanalysis of data extracted from heavy loadings, exploratory factors also measure by confirmatory factor analysis. The Kaiser - Meyer - Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was.901 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (2(903) = 21,082.02, p <
 87 **.4 39 **.2 08 **.1 94 **.3 27 ** LI TA 3. 46 1. 22 5.8 09 1.3 89 **.3 47 **.3 62 **.3 55 ** PA D W 3. 17 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 **.2 68 **.2 16 ** N PZ S 3. 94 1. 07 6.8 20 1.3 96 **.4 00 ** N TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20 1.3 54 ** N TE I 3. 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1 B ot es : * *C or re la tko n is sp gn ifi xa nu a t t he 0.0 1 le vx l ( 2ta lje d). BA A B = te am w or k sd ju st m en t a nx ie dy d is or de r; N C M D = n o co m pe te nc e dr ge lo pm en t; KA D U = [s yd ho so ci al a dj us tm en t d is or de g in te am ; T EC M = te am c on fli ct ; L IT A = pe ss in di vi du wl is m in jz sh a cq ui si gio n; P A D W = p sy ch os oc ia l a dj us tm en t d ir or be r a t w ir kp na ce ; N PA S = nv ga tiv e ps yc ho sm ci al a dj us tm en t v ku lls ; N TE Q = n eg av iv e te am le ad et e xp er he nc e an d qu al ufu ca jio n; N TD N = n tg et jv e tf aj w or k ej be dd ed be ss. The influence os psychosocial adjusemqnt factors on team embeddedness 323 To regucs and structure detectiin of variables PC anwlysis, utylising varimax with Kaiser normalisation rotatiot metioa wcw empuiyfd to identify variables from the coherent inqsptndvnt subset. The fagtorability of the ihekf was examinea and cge analysis of data fxtractgd fron heavy ljadimgs, exploratory factors alsi measured bj cobfirmatory factor cnalysis. The Kaixer-Meuer-Olkin (KMO) measure of samlling adequwcy was.901 aha Bartlett's test of s[hericity was significant ( 2(903) = 21,082.02, p <
87 **.4 39 **.2 08 **.1 94 ** TA 3. 1. 22 5.8 **.3 **.3 55 ** D W 3. 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 68 **.2 16 ** N PA S 3. 94 1. 07 6.8 20 96 **.4 00 ** N TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20 54 N N 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1 N ot es : * *C or re la tio is si gn ifi ca nt a t he 0.0 1 le l ( 2ta ile d). A = te w k ju st m t a nx ie ty d is or de r; N C M D = n o m pe e de lo en PA D T yc ho so ci al a en t d is or de r in am ; EC N = te am c fli ct ; L IT A = le in di vi du al is m in ta sk a cq ui si tio A D W = sy ch os ia a us en t is or de r a t w or kp la ce N PA S = ne ga tiv e ps yc ci a dj us en t s ki ; TE Q = n iv te er xp ie nc e an qu al ifi ca tio N TE N = te am w or k em be dd ne ss. The influence of psychosocial adjustment on team embeddedness 323 To reduce and structure detection of variables PC utilising varimax normalisation rotation method was employed to identify variables the coherent independent subset. factorability of the items was examined and the analysis data from heavy exploratory factors also by confirmatory factor The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) sampling adequacy and test significant ( 2(903) = 21,082.02, p
 87 **.4 39 **.2 08 **.1 94 **.3 27 ** LI TA 3. 46 1. 22 5.8 09 1.3 89 **.3 47 **.3 62 **.3 55 ** PA D W 3. 17 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 **.2 68 **.2 16 ** N PA S 3. 94 1. 07 6.8 20 1.3 96 **.4 00 ** N TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20 1.3 54 ** N TE N 3. 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1 N ot es : * *c or re la tio N is si Gn iFi cA nT a t t He 0.0 1 le Ve l ( 2ta ile d). TA A D = tE Am w oR k ad ju st m en t a nx ie ty d is Or de r; n C m d = n o cO M pE te nc E de ve lo PM eN T; pA D t = pS yC ho So CI aL a dj uS tm En t d is oR de r in te am ; t EC n = tE am c on fli ct ; L it A = Le ss in di vi Du aL is m in ta sk a cQ ui Si tio n; p A d W = p SY ch os Oc iA l a dj Us tm en T D is or dE r a t w or kp La CE ; N PA S = nE Ga tiv e pS YC hO so cI al a dj us tm en t s ki lLS ; N te Q = n eg at iv e te am Le ad er E xP Er IE Nc e An d Qu al ifi ca tIo N; N TE N = N Eg at iv e TE aM W OR k eM Be dd ed ne ss. The Influence of PSycHosociAl AdjUStment FactoRs ON teAm embeddednEss 323 TO reduce anD strucTUre deteCTion of vAriablEs Pc anAlysIS, uTiLisInG VarIMaX wiTH KaIser normAlIsAtion RotaTION MethOd wAs emPloyeD to identify vaRiaBles FRom The coHerenT indEpEndenT subseT. The fAcTorability of the ItemS was examiNed AnD thE aNalysIS of datA exTraCted froM heavy lOAdiNgS, EXPlOratory factors also MeASUrEd by confIrmatoRY fAcTOr analysIs. the kaisER-meyer-olkiN (kMo) measure Of sampLInG aDequacy WaS.901 and BaRtLetT's tEst of SPherIcity wAs signifIcant ( 2(903) = 21,082.02, P <
 87 **.4 39 **.2 08 **.1 9 4 **.3 27** LI  TA  3.  4 6 1.  225.8 09 1.3 89* *.347 **.3 62 **.3 55 **PA DW3 . 17 1.  37 9 .8 07 1 . 25 6  ** .2  6 8 * *. 2  1 6 **N P A S 3.94 1. 07 6 .820  1.3 96 **.4 00  ** N TE Q  3.  79 1. 02 8. 8 2 0 1.354  ** N TEN 3 . 771. 110 .8 151 N ot es  : * *C o r  re lat i on is  si gn ifi ca nta  t t he 0.0 1 leve l (  2 t ai l e d ).TA A D = t eam wo r k adj us t m e n  t a nx ie ty  d is or de r;N C MD= n o co m  pe t en c e  de ve lo p m en  t; PA DT = ps yc ho s o  ci ala dj u s t m e n td  i sorde r i n  t e a m  ;T EC N =  t eam con f l i c t ;L I T A= less in di vi d u a l is m i n task acq u isi ti o n; P  A DW= p sy ch os oc  ial a dj us  tm  e n t  d  is o r  de ra t  wor kp l a ce ;N  PA  S = ne  ga tiv e ps yc ho  s o ci  al a dj  us tm en  t s ki lls  ;  NTE Q =  n eg  ati ve te amle ade rexp er i enc e a nd q u a l ifi ca t io n;N TE N =  n eg at iv e te amw  or k em be d d  e d ne ss.The  influenceof p s ycho soci a ladj u stmen t fac to r so n team embeddedness  3 23 Toreduc e and structu re detecti o n of varia bles PC analysis, util ising  varimax w i th Kaise r nor malisati on rotati o n  methodwas  em plo yed t oidentify vari a b lesfr om thecoh erent i nde pen den t s ub set. Thefactorab il it yof  th e ite m s was ex am ine dand  thea nalysi s ofdata  e xt r act ed from he a v y lo ad in gs,exp lo rator y fa c tor s alsomeasuredbyc onfi rm at ory fac tor analysis.  T he Kaiser- Me yer -Olkin ( KMO) mea sure of sampling adequa c y was.9 01and B artl ett's tes t o f sphe ric i ty was  signi fican t( 2 ( 9 03) = 2 1, 082 .0 2, p <
 87_**.4 39_**.2 08 **.1 94_**.3 27_**_LI TA_3._46 1. 22_5.8 09 1.3_89 **.3 47 **.3_62 **.3 55_**_PA D W 3. 17 1. 37 9.8 07 1.2 56 **.2 68 **.2_16_** N_PA_S_3. 94 1. 07 6.8_20 1.3 96 **.4 00_** N_TE Q 3. 79 1. 02 8.8 20_1.3_54 ** N_TE N 3. 77 1. 11 0.8 15 1_N ot es : * *C_or re la_tio_n_is si gn ifi_ca nt a t t he_0.0 1 le ve l (_2ta ile d). TA A D =_te am w or k ad_ju st m en t_a nx_ie ty d is or_de r; N_C M_D = n_o co m pe te nc_e de ve_lo pm en t; PA D_T_= ps yc_ho_so_ci al_a dj us_tm_en t_d_is or de r in te_am_; T EC N = te am_c on fli ct_;_L IT A =_le ss in di vi_du al is m in ta_sk a_cq ui_si tio n; P A D W = p sy ch_os oc ia l a dj_us tm en t_d is_or_de r a_t_w or_kp la ce ; N PA S_= ne_ga tiv e ps yc ho_so ci al a_dj_us tm en t s ki_lls ; N TE Q =_n eg at iv e_te_am_le ad er e xp_er ie nc e an d_qu al ifi_ca tio n; N TE N =_n_eg at iv e te am_w_or k em be dd ed_ne_ss._The influence of psychosocial adjustment_factors on team embeddedness 323 To_reduce and structure detection of variables PC analysis, utilising_varimax with Kaiser_normalisation rotation method was employed_to_identify_variables from the coherent independent subset. The factorability of the_items was_examined and the_analysis of data extracted from heavy loadings, exploratory factors also_measured by confirmatory factor analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin_(KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was.901 and Bartlett's test of sphericity_was significant ( 2(903) = 21,082.02, p <