 statue is familiar. The part structure of a case involves not spatial, functional, or temporal parts, but rather parts based on the 'information content' of the situation made up from the relevant properties (intrinsic or relational) holding of the correlated object. Thus, object-related cases are ontologically distinct from the correlated objects if the latter are material objects or events. The understanding of evaluative properties and the part structure of object-related cases indicate that object-related cases are on a par with cases that are situations acting as truthmakers of sentences, motivating a unified account of cases described by clausal and object-related case-NPs. Objectrelated cases carry just those properties relevant for verifying that the correlated object meets the contextually given condition. For the semantics of object-related case-terms, sentences are not available; instead simple propositions of the form\P, o[can serve as the entities that truthmakers stand in the truthmaking relation to, where P is a contextually given property of the relevant legal or medical type. The noun case in object-related case-NPs will also involve a case space, a set X of alternative situations s, s ⊩\P, d[for a suitable object d. An object-related casenominal will then have the semantics below: 58 An object-related case thus involves a filtering condition regarding the correlated object, which determines which properties or relations are constitutive of the object-related case. This condition may be called an ontological case filter mimicking the more familiar, but unrelated, syntactic notion of a 'Case Filter' of Chomsky (1981). 123 Situations, alternatives, and the semantics of 'cases' (11) For a context c, [case of the stolen statue]c={\s, X[ |\s, X[∈ [case]c & s ⊩\P, [the stolen statue]c[} Given that object-related cases can be identical to property-related cases, a property-related case nominal would have the semantics below, where X is a set of situation s, s⊩\[theft], d[for objects d in a suitable contextually given set Ac: 59,60 (12) For a context c, [case of theft]c={\s, X[ | ∃d (d ∈ Ac &\s, X[∈ [case] c & s ⊩\[theft], d[)} Object-related cases may differ from their
statue is familiar. The part structure of a case imply not spatial, running, or temporal parts, but preferably part based on the' information subject' of the position made up from the relevant property (intrinsic or relational) holding of the correlated aim. Thus, object - related cases are ontologically discrete from the correlated objects if the latter are material objects or events. The agreement of evaluative properties and the part social organization of object - related case argue that object - relate cases are on a par with cases that are situation acting as truthmakers of sentences, motivating a unified account of case described by clausal and object - related case - NPs. Objectrelated cases carry just those property relevant for verifying that the correlated aim meet the contextually give condition. For the semantics of object - refer shell - terms, sentences are not available; alternatively simple propositions of the form\P, o[can serve as the entities that truthmakers stand in the truthmaking relation to, where phosphorus is a contextually given property of the relevant legal or medical type. The noun case in object - related font - NPs will also involve a case space, a determined X of alternative situations s, s ⊩\P, d[for a suitable object d. An object - related casenominal will then have the semantics below: 58 An aim - related case thus involves a filtering condition see the correlated aim, which determines which properties or relations are constitutive of the aim - related case. This condition may be address an ontological case filter mimic the more familiar, but unrelated, syntactic notion of a' Case Filter' of Chomsky (1981). 123 Situations, option, and the semantics of' cases' (11) For a context c, [ case of the stolen statue]c={\s, X [ |\s, X[∈ [ case]c & s ⊩\P, [ the steal statue]c [ } Given that object - related case can be identical to property - related cases, a property - related case noun phrase would have the semantics below, where X is a set of situation s, s⊩\[theft ], d[for objects d in a suitable contextually given set Ac: 59,60 (12) For a context carbon, [ case of theft]c={\s, X [ | ∃d (d ∈ Ac & \s, X[∈ [ case ] c & s ⊩\[theft ], d [) } Object - related cases may differ from their
 stwtue is familiar. The paru structure of a eqse intolves hot spatkal, functional, or temporal perts, but eather parts based on ghe 'inforlation cinteit' of the situatmkn made up frkl thz celevant properjies (intrinshc or relationdl) hllding of the correlated object. Thuf, objecy-rflated cases ate onuoljgiczlly distinct from the correlated kbjects if the lattet are material objects or fvenhs. The understandijg of evaluqtivq properties xnd the pagc structure of object-related cases indicatd thac object-relqtwd fdses are on a pag with cases bnat ara situayions acting ax tcuthnakers of sentences, mmtivating a unifieq account oy cases described by xlqusal and objdxt-rdlaued czse-NPs. Oboectrelated cases carrt just those properuief relevant for verifrigg that the correlated object meets the cohtextually given condituon. For the semantics of objece-related case-terms, sentences are not available; invtead rimklc oeooositions of the form\P, o[can serve as the entiejex nhat truthmakers ftand in thr hrijhmaking relatkon to, whsre P is a contextkally gyven property jf tne relevant legal or medicao type. The njyn case in object-rzlated case-N's wilk alsp involve a case space, c set S of alternwtive sithxtions s, s ⊩\P, d[fof a sgitable object d. An object-welated cesenokinal wkll jhen hade the semwntics below: 58 An object-rflateb casa thus invllves a filtering condition regecding the corteldteg object, whicm determines whych properties or relctions are constptutive oh the object-welated case. Djis conditioi may be sallwd ab ontolueical case filyer mimicking the mire familiar, but ukrelajes, syntactic notnub of a 'Case Filyer' of Cjokshf (1981). 123 Situatiots, autefmativds, and uke wdmanyics of 'cases' (11) For a confext c, [case of the sbolen stajue]c={\s, X[ |\s, X[∈ [case]c & s ⊩\P, [the stolen statue]f[} Givxn thav objevt-rglated cases can be identical tk propertj-rejated cases, w priperty-relateb case nominal would have the semantics uelow, where X is a set if situation s, s⊩\[theyt], d[for objecvs d ig a suitatle contextually givwn set Ac: 59,60 (12) For a context c, [case of thsft]c={\s, F[ | ∃d (f ∈ Ac &\s, X[∈ [case] c & s ⊩\[theft], d[)} Object-related cases may differ from their
statue is familiar. The part structure of involves spatial, functional, temporal parts, but 'information of the situation up from the properties (intrinsic or relational) holding of correlated object. Thus, object-related cases are ontologically distinct from the correlated objects if latter are material objects or events. The understanding of evaluative properties and the structure object-related indicate object-related cases are on a par with cases that are situations acting as truthmakers of sentences, a unified account of cases described by clausal object-related case-NPs. Objectrelated cases just those properties relevant for that correlated object the given For the semantics object-related case-terms, sentences are not available; instead simple propositions of the form\P, o[can serve as the entities truthmakers stand truthmaking relation where is contextually given property relevant legal or medical type. The object-related case-NPs will also involve a case space, set X alternative situations s, s ⊩\P, d[for suitable object d. An object-related casenominal will then the semantics below: 58 An object-related case thus involves a filtering condition regarding the correlated determines which properties or are constitutive of object-related This may called an case filter mimicking the more familiar, but unrelated, syntactic notion of 'Case Filter' of Chomsky (1981). 123 Situations, alternatives, and the 'cases' For a context [case of the stolen X[ X[∈ [case]c & s stolen Given can identical property-related cases, a property-related nominal would have the semantics where X is a d[for objects d in a suitable contextually given Ac: 59,60 (12) For a context c, of theft]c={\s, X[ | ∃d (d ∈ Ac &\s, X[∈ [case] c s ⊩\[theft], cases may differ from their
 statue is familiar. The part stRucture of a Case iNvoLveS nOt spAtiaL, functional, or tEMporAl parts, but rather parts bAsed oN tHE 'infORmAtion Content' OF tHE SitUaTiOn mAdE Up From tHe rElevant Properties (IntRiNsic or relatiONaL) holding of The Correlated obJecT. Thus, oBjEct-RElateD caSes arE ontolOGicallY distinct FrOM the coRRelated OBJeCts iF the latter are mateRIaL Objects or eventS. The unDeRStANDinG of Evaluative PrOpertIEs and thE PaRT STruCTure of object-rElated cases INdiCate thAt ObjECt-relaTed caSeS Are On a par with cAses That are siTuatioNS acting AS truthmAkers oF seNteNces, MOtIvAtiNg A UniFIeD acCOunT of cases DeScRibed By clAUSAL and ObjEct-rElateD case-NPs. ObjecTreLateD CasEs carRy jusT thoSe PropeRties rElevaNt For verifying thaT the CorrelateD obJeCt mEeTs the COntextUalLy gIven conDition. FOR thE sEMANtIcs of object-related CaSE-TeRms, senteNces arE NoT aVAilable; iNsTeaD simPLE propOsitIOnS of the foRm\P, o[caN SeRvE as the eNtIties tHaT trUthMakerS StanD in the TruthmakIng reLAtion to, where P iS A contextually GIvEN PrOPertY of The relevant LegaL Or meDicaL TyPe. THE noun Case iN oBJeCT-related case-NPs will AlSo invoLve a cAse space, a set X Of alternatIVE SituatioNs s, s ⊩\p, D[fOR a suitable objeCt d. An Object-relaTEd casenoMinal Will then Have the seMANtics belOw: 58 AN obJecT-reLATeD case thus invoLVEs a fIlTering cOndItion reGarDinG thE coRrElated objEct, which DeTeRmInEs wHich pROperties Or RelAtIonS are cONstituTive oF the ObJeCT-reLated caSE. THIS conDiTiOn maY be CaLled aN ontOLogIcal casE filter miMicKIng tHe MoRe familIar, but unrelatEd, Syntactic nOtIon Of a 'CasE fIlter' of CHomsky (1981). 123 Situations, alternaTIves, and The SemanTics Of 'cases' (11) FoR a cOntext C, [caSE of the Stolen StatuE]c={\S, X[ |\s, x[∈ [CAse]c & s ⊩\p, [THe StoLeN statue]c[} GiVEN thAt objEcT-relAted casEs can be identical to PRopErty-related caSes, A proPERtY-reLAtED caSe NOmiNAL would have the seMantics belOw, WHeRe X is a set oF SitUaTion s, s⊩\[tHeft], d[foR objeCTs d in a sUitable coNtextuallY gIven SET Ac: 59,60 (12) for a contexT c, [case of Theft]c={\s, X[ | ∃d (D ∈ ac &\s, X[∈ [cASe] C & s ⊩\[theFt], d[)} object-ReLatEd casEs may dIFfeR from Their
 statue is familiar. The p art struct ure o f a  ca se  inv olve s not spatial, func tional, or temporal pa rts,bu t  rat h er  part s based on t he'i nf orm at i on  cont ent ' of th e situatio n m ad e up from th e  r elevant pr ope rties (intri nsi c or r el ati o nal)hol dingof the correl ated obje ct .  Thus, object- r e la tedcases are ontolog i ca l ly distinct fr om the  c o rr e l ate d o bjects ifth e lat t er arem at e r i alo bjects or eve nts. The un d ers tandin gofe valuat ive p ro p ert ies and the  par t structu re ofo bject-r e lated c ases i ndi cat e th a tob jec t- r ela t ed  ca s esare on a  p ar  with  cas e s t hatare  sit uatio ns acting astru thma k ers  of s enten ces,  m otiva ting a  unif ie d account of ca sesdescribed  by  c lau sa l and object -re lat ed case -NPs. O b jec tr e l a te d cases carry just  t h o se  propert ies re l ev an t  for ver if yin g th a t  thecorr e la ted obje ct mee t sth e conte xt uallygi ven  co nditi o n. F or the  semanti cs of object-related case-terms, s e nt e n ce s  are  no t available ; in s tead  sim p le  pr o posit ionsof th e  form\P, o[can serv eas the  enti ties that tru thmakers s t a n d in the  tru t hm a king relationto, w here P isa  context ually  given p roperty o f the rele van t l ega l o r me dical type. T h e  nou ncase in  ob ject-re lat edcas e-N Ps  will als o involv eaca se  sp ace,a  set X o falt er nat ive s i tuatio ns s,  s ⊩ \P ,d [fo r a sui t ab l e  obj ec td. A n o bj ect-r elat e d c asenomi nal willthe n  hav eth e seman tics below: 5 8An object- re lat ed cas e thus inv olves a filtering condi t ion reg ard ing t he c orrelated  ob ject,whi c h dete rmines  whic hpro p e rties o rrel at ions are c o n sti tutiv eof t he obje ct-related case. T h iscondition may  be  cal l e dano nt o log ic a l c a s e filter mimick ing the mo re fa miliar, bu t  un re lated,syntact ic no t ion ofa 'Case F ilter' of  C homs k y  (1 981). 123Situatio ns, alter n ative s ,and t hesemant ic s o f 'ca ses' ( 1 1)For a  conte xt  c, [c ase o fthe stol en statue]c={\s, X[ |\s , X[∈[case ]c& s ⊩\P,[th e  st olen stat ue]c [} Given t hat  ob ject- rel a ted c ases ca n b e  iden tica l  to prope r ty -re l a te d cases, ap r o per ty-re lat e d case  nom inal would have t h e semantics be low, w her e X is a  s et of situatio n s ,s ⊩ \[theft] ,d[for objec ts d inas uitab le con textua lly giv e n  s e t Ac:59,6 0 ( 12) For a  co nt e xt c, [ ca se of the ft]c ={ \s, X[  | ∃d( d ∈A c  &\s, X[∈ [case]  c &s ⊩\[th e ft] , d[) }Object- r elat ed cases m ay differ f rom th eir
 statue_is familiar._The part structure of_a case_involves_not spatial,_functional,_or temporal parts,_but rather parts_based on the 'information_content' of the_situation_made up from the relevant properties (intrinsic or relational) holding of the correlated object._Thus,_object-related cases_are_ontologically_distinct from the correlated objects_if the latter are material_objects or_events. The understanding of evaluative properties and the_part_structure of object-related_cases indicate that object-related cases are on a par_with cases that are situations acting_as truthmakers of_sentences,_motivating_a unified account of_cases described by clausal and object-related_case-NPs. Objectrelated cases carry just those_properties relevant for verifying that the correlated_object meets the contextually given condition._For the semantics of object-related_case-terms, sentences_are not available; instead simple_propositions of the_form\P, o[can_serve as the_entities that truthmakers stand in the_truthmaking relation to,_where P is a contextually given_property_of the relevant_legal_or_medical type._The noun case_in_object-related case-NPs_will_also involve a case space, a_set_X of alternative situations s, s ⊩\P,_d[for a suitable object_d._An object-related casenominal will_then have the semantics below:_58 An object-related case thus involves_a filtering_condition regarding_the correlated object, which determines which properties or relations are constitutive_of the object-related case. This condition_may be called an_ontological case_filter_mimicking the more_familiar,_but unrelated,_syntactic notion of a 'Case Filter' of_Chomsky (1981)._123 Situations, alternatives, and the semantics_of 'cases' (11) For_a_context c, [case of the stolen_statue]c={\s, X[ |\s, X[∈ [case]c &_s ⊩\P, [the stolen statue]c[}_Given_that_object-related cases can be identical_to property-related cases, a property-related case_nominal would have_the semantics below, where X is a_set_of situation s, s⊩\[theft], d[for objects_d_in a suitable contextually given set_Ac:_59,60_(12) For a context c,_[case of theft]c={\s, X[ | ∃d_(d ∈ Ac &\s, X[∈ [case] c & s_⊩\[theft], d[)} Object-related_cases may differ from their