 out of fairness to all. However, while this is an admirable goal, it might not always be possible to accommodate every culture's ways of being. Imagine a culture that refuses to permit its competitors to wear proper athletic shoes to compete in track events. But if one wears other foot gear, that foot gear would permanently damage the surface of the track in costly ways and cause dangers to other competitors. In such circumstances, members of that culture will simply be shut out of the sport until their cultural mores permit them to run track with proper foot apparel that does not damage the track's surface or endanger other competitors. Reasonableness ought not to give way to foolishness – even cultural foolishness. Sometimes, one's own culture locks one out of participation in certain events. Inclusiveness and diversity have their limits. We must be ever careful to not exalt them to the status of absolute behavioral norms. Indeed, some United States television commentators noted that the sand at the 2012 London Olympic beach volleyball venues is a special type that does not stick to the skin, probably for the comfort of the athletes both male and female. Perhaps also of assistance along these lines might be the wearing of tops and shorts made of spandex or lycra that would help prevent sand from creating discomfort for the athletes under their skin as they dive, dig, and fall in the sand, though it is imaginable that very short tops and shorts might suffice along these lines depending on their fit and the athlete's body type. So it is unclear that comfort during competition necessarily means less revealing gear. Wearing less revealing gear might translate into more comfort, at least for some athletes. But also noted by some of the media was the possibility of commercial disaster for that venue should that venue's weather prohibit the donning of bikini gear for the women competitors. This is a recognition of the fact that many heterosexual men (being a primary commercial target group) enjoy viewing women's beach volleyball in part because most of the women wear bikini wear or short shorts, weather permitting. But even if one takes this as an empirical datum, what is especially wrong with that, especially if there is a strong recognition of the athleticism of the female competitors? Is there something wrong with one's watching Serena Williams play tennis and recognizing her incredible beauty as well as her unprecedented talent? Indeed, a perusal of her J. Angelo Corlett 14 own website makes it clear that she is proud of her physical beauty (and should be!). Is it so wrong even for
out of fairness to all. However, while this is an admirable goal, it might not always be possible to lodge every acculturation's ways of being. Imagine a culture that refuse to permit its competitors to tire proper acrobatic shoes to compete in track events. But if one wears other metrical foot gear, that foot gearing would permanently damage the surface of the track in costly ways and cause dangers to other rival. In such circumstances, members of that culture will just be shut out of the sport until their cultural more permit them to move track with proper metrical foot apparel that does not damage the track's surface or endanger early competitors. Reasonableness ought not to give way to foolishness – even cultural foolishness. Sometimes, one's own culture lock one out of engagement in certain events. Inclusiveness and diversity have their limits. We must be ever careful to not exalt them to the condition of absolute behavioral norms. Indeed, some United States television receiver commentators noted that the backbone at the 2012 London Olympic beach volleyball venue is a limited type that does not stick to the skin, probably for the comfort of the athletes both male and female. Perhaps besides of assistance along these lines might be the wearing of tops and shorts made of spandex or lycra that would help prevent sand from creating discomfort for the athletes under their skin as they dive, dig, and fall in the backbone, though it is imaginable that very brusque top and shorts might suffice along these lines depending on their paroxysm and the athlete's body type. So it is ill-defined that comfort during competition necessarily means less revealing gearing. Wearing less revealing gear might translate into more comfort, at least for some athletes. But besides noted by some of the media was the possibility of commercial disaster for that venue should that venue's weather forbid the donning of bikini gear for the women rival. This is a recognition of the fact that many heterosexual men (being a primary commercial target group) enjoy see women's beach volleyball in function because most of the women wear bikini wear or short shorts, weather permitting. But even if one take this as an empirical datum, what is particularly wrong with that, especially if there is a strong recognition of the athleticism of the female competitors? Is there something wrong with one's watch Serena Williams play tennis and recognizing her incredible beauty as well as her unprecedented talent? Indeed, a perusal of her J. Angelo Corlett 14 own website makes it clean that she is gallant of her forcible beauty (and should be !). Is it so amiss even for
 ouh of fairness to all. Howtver, while this is an adkirabls goal, ig might not always be possibpe to axcommodate every cultufe's ways lf being. Imajine a culture tizt refuses to iermic mts competitors to wear psoper athletic sfozs to compete in track events. But if one wesrd other foot ggar, tnwt fkot gear would permanently damage fhe surhace of the travk in costly ways and causf dajgers to other comoetitors. In sucr circumstancds, members of that culjure will simply be shut out of ghe s'ort until jkwir wultural moces pegmit them to vln tracn with lroper foot apiarel thqt does not damage thx track's surface or gndanger odhzr competitors. Reasonqboenesv oucht vit go fite say to foklishness – even cultueal foolishness. Somttiivx, one's own chlture ljcks one out of participation in certait ebents. Inclusiveness and diversity have their limits. Wq must be ever careful to not exalt them to the sdatus uf cnfuouhe behavioral norms. Indeed, some United States fekenision commentatovs noted that the xajd wt the 2012 Londov Olym'jc beach volleyball genues ys a wpecial trpe yhat does not stick to the wkin, probablj foe the comfort of tke athletes yoth msle amd female. Perhaps also uf aasistance apong thess lines might be ghe waaring of tops and shorts iade of s'ander or lycfa tnat wotld help pgevenb sand from creatinh diseomfost for the athletes under their skin as tixy dive, dig, amd fanl in thz sand, though it is imaginable thct very fhort tops and ahorts kight suffise along thesa lines depenving on treir fit and thd athlete's body type. So pt is ynclear that comfovt dutihg competition utcewsarily means lrss redewlmng gqdr. Wearing lass fevdsling gear might granxlate into more comfmrt, zt least for some stmletes. Buj also noeed by some og the media was tht possmbilitb of cpmmgrcial disaster for that venue ahould thwt yenue's weathew prihibit the dpnning of bikini gear for the women com'etitors. This is a recotnition of the fact uhat many hetxrosextal men (baing a primary commeecial target grouk) enjoy viewing women's geach eollejball in part because most of the women wear bikini wear or short shorts, qeathec [ermitting. Gut rven pf jue takef thms as an empirical datum, what is especially wrong with thdt, especially if there is a sttovg recognitiov of the athleticism of fhe femake competitors? Is there somethimg wrong with one's watchlng Serenq Wilmiams imab tennis and recogniaing hzr inceedible beamty as well as het mnprecedenhed ualeut? Indeed, a perusal of her J. Angeoo Coroeht 14 own website kakes it clcav that she if proud of her pgysidwl bexuty (and shoukd be!). Is it so wrong even for
out of fairness to all. However, while an goal, it not always be ways being. Imagine a that refuses to its competitors to wear proper athletic to compete in track events. But if one wears other foot gear, that gear would permanently damage the surface of the track in costly ways and dangers other In circumstances, members of that culture will simply be shut out of the sport until their cultural permit them to run track with proper foot that does not damage track's surface or endanger other Reasonableness not to way foolishness even cultural foolishness. one's own culture locks one out of participation in certain events. Inclusiveness and diversity have their limits. must be to not them the of absolute behavioral some United States television commentators noted at the 2012 London Olympic beach volleyball venues a special that does not stick to the probably for the comfort of the athletes both and female. Perhaps also of assistance along these lines might be the wearing of tops made of spandex or that would help sand creating for athletes under skin as they dive, dig, and fall in the sand, though is imaginable that very short tops and shorts might suffice lines on their fit the athlete's body type. it unclear that comfort during means revealing revealing might into more comfort, at for some athletes. But also by some of the commercial disaster for that venue should that venue's prohibit the donning of bikini gear for women competitors. This is a recognition of the fact that many heterosexual (being a target group) enjoy viewing women's beach volleyball in because most of the wear bikini wear or short shorts, weather permitting. But if takes this an empirical datum, is especially wrong that, especially if a strong of athleticism competitors? Is there something wrong with watching Williams play tennis and recognizing incredible well as her unprecedented talent? Indeed, a perusal of her J. Angelo Corlett 14 own it clear that she proud her physical beauty (and should be!). Is it so wrong even for
 out of fairness to all. However, While this iS an adMirAblE gOal, iT migHt not always be pOSsibLe to accommodate every cuLture'S wAYs of BEiNg. ImaGine a cuLTuRE ThaT rEfUseS tO PeRmit iTs cOmpetitOrs to wear pRopEr Athletic shoeS To Compete in tRacK events. But if One Wears oThEr fOOt geaR, thAt fooT gear wOUld perManently dAmAGe the sURface of THE tRack In costly ways and caUSe DAngers to other cOmpetiToRS. IN SUch CirCumstances, MeMbers OF that cuLTuRE WIll SImply be shut ouT of the sport UNtiL their CuLtuRAl moreS permIt THem To run track wIth pRoper foot AppareL That doeS Not damaGe the tRacK's sUrfaCE oR eNdaNgER otHEr ComPEtiTors. ReasOnAbLenesS ougHT NOT to gIve Way tO foolIshness – even cuLtuRal fOOliShnesS. SomeTimeS, oNe's owN cultuRe locKs One out of particiPatiOn in certaIn eVeNts. inClusiVEness aNd dIveRsity haVe their LImiTs. wE MUsT be ever careful to noT eXALt Them to thE statuS Of AbSOlute behAvIorAl noRMS. IndeEd, soME UNited StaTes telEViSiOn commeNtAtors nOtEd tHat The saND at tHe 2012 LondOn OlympiC beacH Volleyball venuES is a special tyPE tHAT dOEs noT stIck to the skiN, proBAbly For tHE cOmfORt of tHe athLeTEs BOth male and female. PerHaPs also Of assIstance along tHese lines mIGHT be the weArinG Of TOps and shorts maDe of sPandex or lyCRa that woUld heLp prevenT sand from CREating diScoMfoRt fOr tHE AtHletes under thEIR skiN aS they diVe, dIg, and faLl iN thE saNd, tHoUgh it is imAginable ThAt VeRy ShoRt topS And shortS mIghT sUffIce alONg thesE lineS depEnDiNG on Their fiT AnD THe atHlEtE's boDy tYpE. So it Is unCLeaR that coMfort duriNg cOMpetItIoN necessArily means lesS rEvealing geAr. weaRing leSS RevealinG gear might translate into MOre comfOrt, At leaSt foR some athlEteS. But alSo nOTed by sOme of tHe medIa Was THE possIBIlIty Of Commercial DISasTer foR tHat vEnue shoUld that venue's weathER prOhibit the donnIng Of biKINi GeaR FoR The WoMEn cOMPetitors. This is a RecognitioN oF ThE fact that mANy hEtErosexuAl men (beIng a pRImary coMmercial tArget grouP) eNjoy VIEwiNg women's beAch volleYball in paRT becaUSe Most oF thE women WeAr bIkini Wear or SHorT shorTs, weatHeR permiTting. buT even if oNe takes this as an empiricaL datum, What iS esPecially wRonG WitH that, espeCialLy if there iS a sTroNg recOgnITion oF the AThLetICism oF the FEmale compETiTorS? iS tHere somethiNG WRonG with One'S WatchiNg SeRena Williams play tENnis and recogniZing HER inCreDIble BeAuty as well as heR unPrECEdented tAlEnt? Indeed, a pErusal of HeR j. AngeLo CorlEtt 14 own Website MAKeS It cleaR thaT shE is proud oF heR pHYsical bEaUtY (And shoUld bE!). IS it so wRong evEN for
 out of fairness to all. H owever, wh ile t his  is  a n ad mira ble goal, it m i ghtnot always be possible  to a cc o mmod a te  ever y cultu r e' s way sof  be in g .Imagi nea cultu re that re fus es  to permit i t scompetitor s t o wear prope r a thleti csho e s tocom petein tra c k even ts. But i fo ne wea r s other f oo t ge ar, that foot gea r  w o uld permanentl y dama ge th e sur fac e of the t ra ck in costlyw ay s a ndc ause dangersto other co m pet itors.  I n s u ch cir cumst an c es,  members of  tha t culture  wills imply b e  shut o ut ofthe  sp ortu nt il  th ei r  cu l tu ral mor es permi tth em to  run t r a ck w ith  pro per f oot apparel t hat  doe s  no t dam age t he t ra ck'ssurfac e oren danger other co mpet itors. Re aso na ble ne ss ou g ht not  to  gi ve wayto fool i shn es s –  e ven cultural fooli sh n e ss . Someti mes, o n e' so wn cultu re  lo ckso n e out  ofp ar ticipati on inc er ta in even ts . Incl us ive nes s and dive rsityhave the ir li m its. We must b e  ever careful to n ot exal t t hem to thestat u s of  abs o lu teb ehavi oralno r ms .  Indeed, some Unite dStates  tele vision commen tators not e d that the  san d  a t  the 2012 Lond on Ol ympic beac h  volleyb all v enues is  a specia l type tha t d oes  no t s t i ck  to the skin, p roba bl y for t hecomfort  of  th e a thl et es both m ale andfe ma le .Per hapsa lso of a ss ist an cealong theselines  mig ht  b e  th e weari n go f  top san d sh ort smadeof s p and ex or l ycra that  wo u ld h el pprevent  sand from cr ea ting disco mf ort  for t h e  athlete s under their skin as t h ey dive , d ig, a nd f all in th e s and, t hou g h it i s imag inabl etha t verys h or t t op s and shor t s  mi ght s uf fice  alongthese lines depend i ngon their fitand  the a th let e 's bod yt ype . So it is unclea r that com fo r tduring com p eti ti on nece ssarily  mean s  less r evealinggear. Wea ri ng l e s s r evealing g ear migh t transla t e int o  m ore c omf ort, a tlea st fo r some ath letes . Butal so not ed by  s ome of t he media was the possib ilityof co mme rcial dis ast e r f or that v enue  should th atven ue'swea t her p rohi b it  th e  donn ingo f bikinig ea r f o r  t he women co m p e tit ors.Thi s  is areco gnition of the fa c t that many he tero s e xua l m e n (b ei ng a primary c omm er c i al targe tgroup) enjo y viewin gw omen' s beac h voll eyballi n  p a rt bec ause  mo st of the  wo me n  wear b ik in i  wearor s ho rt sho rts, w e athe r permitting. Buteveni f  onet ake s thi sas an e m piri cal datum,  what is es pecial ly w rongwith th at , espe cia ll y if there is a stro ng re cogniti on  ofthe  athle tici s m  of t he f em ale  competit o r s? Is  t h ere  som ethin gwron g with on e 's watch ing SerenaWi lli a m s play te n n is and rec ogn izing h er incredi b le b e au t y aswell a s herunprece d ent ed  talent ? I n d eed, a pe rusal ofh erJ.  Ang elo Corl et t 14  o wnwe bsite makes itclear th at she i s proudofh er p h ysical  b eauty (and s hould  b e !). Isi t  so  wronge ven  fo r
 out_of fairness_to all. However, while_this is_an_admirable goal,_it_might not always_be possible to_accommodate every culture's ways_of being. Imagine_a_culture that refuses to permit its competitors to wear proper athletic shoes to compete_in_track events._But_if_one wears other foot gear,_that foot gear would permanently_damage the_surface of the track in costly ways and_cause_dangers to other_competitors. In such circumstances, members of that culture will_simply be shut out of the_sport until their_cultural_mores_permit them to run_track with proper foot apparel that_does not damage the track's surface_or endanger other competitors. Reasonableness ought not_to give way to foolishness –_even cultural foolishness. Sometimes, one's_own culture_locks one out of participation_in certain events._Inclusiveness and_diversity have their_limits. We must be ever careful_to not exalt_them to the status of absolute_behavioral_norms. Indeed, some_United_States_television commentators_noted that the_sand_at the_2012_London Olympic beach volleyball venues is_a_special type that does not stick to_the skin, probably for_the_comfort of the athletes_both male and female. Perhaps_also of assistance along these lines_might be_the wearing_of tops and shorts made of spandex or lycra that would_help prevent sand from creating discomfort_for the athletes under_their skin_as_they dive, dig,_and_fall in_the sand, though it is imaginable that_very short_tops and shorts might suffice along_these lines depending on_their_fit and the athlete's body type._So it is unclear that comfort_during competition necessarily means less_revealing_gear._Wearing less revealing gear might_translate into more comfort, at least_for some athletes._But also noted by some of the_media_was the possibility of commercial disaster_for_that venue should that venue's weather_prohibit_the_donning of bikini gear for_the women competitors. This is a_recognition of the fact that many heterosexual men (being_a primary commercial_target group) enjoy viewing women's_beach_volleyball_in part because most of the women wear bikini wear_or short_shorts, weather permitting._But even if one takes this as an empirical datum,_what is especially wrong with that, especially_if there is a strong recognition of the athleticism of the_female competitors? Is there something wrong with one's_watching Serena Williams play tennis and recognizing_her incredible beauty as_well_as her unprecedented talent? Indeed, a perusal_of_her_J._Angelo Corlett 14_own website makes_it clear that_she is_proud of her_physical beauty_(and should be!)._Is_it so wrong even for