 communicates the way of a thing, or that without which a thing is unimaginable. Substance can be said to have properties (Thomas, 1999). Substance, be that as it may, has an interminable property or "essence" as some scholars will call it16. In that capacity, an attribute suggests fundamentally a connection to some substance of which it is a viewpoint or a component in its origination. Attributes can likewise be said to inhere in their substance. Descartes opined Attribute has the guideline property which constitutes its tendency and substance, and to which all its different properties are alluded (Kirkebøen, 2001). Spinoza also defines the term "attribute" as, what the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence (Kirkebøen, 2001). For instance for Descartes, the attribute of the mind is thinking, doubting. Attributes is also at the very heart of Spinoza's metaphysics. For him they empower us to comprehend and discuss an augmented world and a reasoning world as far as which we comprehend bodies and brains. In their attempt to answer the problem, thinkers have taken after two great inclinations. Some have precluded the objectivity by claiming that attribute can exist independently; others have made it subjective, claiming it is impossible. Aristotle comprehensively recognizes substance and attributes. Aristotle attempted to separate between a substance and its attribute with this in the sentence: "The house is red", the subject of the sentence "the house" alludes to an individual thing, a substance; and the predicate of the sentence "is red" alludes to the attribute of the substance. Along these lines an essential substance as subject is linguistically recognized from its properties as descriptor which "is available in and predicable of a subject". Secondary substances are communicated by all inclusive terms, things, and by its definition; it is not present in a subject but rather is predicable of it. 5. Substance-Attribute Theory and Its Problem Substance-attribute hypothesis is an ontological hypothesis about objecthood, placing that a substance is particular from its attributes. A thing-in-itself is a property-carrier that must be recognized from the properties it bears (attributes) (Lin, 2006: p. 151). Having this as a main priority one could pose fundamental inquiries. What is the relationship amongst substances and attribute? Is it feasible for there to exist one perspective without the other? In the event that "substance" is an element
communicates the way of a thing, or that without which a thing is impossible. means can be said to have place (Thomas, 1999). meaning, be that as it may, has an interminable place or " essence " as some scholars will call it16. In that capability, an attribute suggests basically a connection to some substance of which it is a viewpoint or a component in its origin. Attributes can likewise be said to inhere in their substance. Descartes opined Attribute accept the guideline property which establish its tendency and substance, and to which all its different properties are allude (Kirkebøen, 2001). Spinoza also define the term " attribute " as, what the intellect perceive of substance as constituting its essence (Kirkebøen, 2001). For instance for Descartes, the attribute of the mind is thinking, doubting. Attributes is also at the very heart of Spinoza's metaphysics. For him they empower us to comprehend and discuss an augmented world and a reasoning world as far as which we grok bodies and brains. In their attack to suffice the problem, thinkers have taken after two great tendency. Some have precluded the objectivity by claiming that attribute can exist independently; others have made it immanent, claiming it is impossible. Aristotle comprehensively recognizes substance and attributes. Aristotle attempted to separate between a substance and its attribute with this in the sentence: " The house is red ", the subject of the conviction " the house " allude to an individual matter, a means; and the predicate of the sentence " is red " alludes to the property of the substance. Along these lines an essential substance as subject is linguistically recognized from its properties as descriptor which " is available in and predicable of a subject ". junior-grade substances are communicated by all inclusive terms, things, and by its definition; it is not present in a subject but preferably is predicable of it. 5. Substance - Attribute Theory and Its Problem Substance - property hypothesis is an ontological hypothesis about objecthood, placing that a substance is finical from its attributes. A thing - in - itself is a property - carrier that must be recognized from the property it bears (attribute) (Lin, 2006: p. 151). Having this as a main priority one could pose fundamental inquiry. What is the relationship amongst substances and property? Is it feasible for there to exist one perspective without the other? In the event that " substance " is an element
 colmunicates the way of a uhing, or that witkiut whmch a tging is jnimaginable. Substance can bx saud to have properties (Thomar, 1999). Substajce, be tyat es it may, has an intermikcble lvopercy or "essence" as some schonars will call ig16. Nn that capacity, an attribute suggeses fundsmfntally a conngctiom to aome substance of which it is a viswpoint or a componemt in its origination. Attrlbutfs can likewise be said to inyere un their subrtance. Desbcrtes opines Attribute has the guideline pfopercy which cobsritkjes its tendxncy agd substance, and to fhich akl its differekt prmpeeties are alluded (Kirnebøen, 2001). Spinoza alsj defines tke term "attribute" as, qhqt thg intallezr pdrctivxs kf subdtaice as consfituting itw essence (Kirkebøen, 2001). Fjg instance fod Descwrees, the attribute of the mind is thinkitg, soubting. Attributes is qlso at the very hearj of Spinosa's metaphysics. For him they empower us to comprevend ena dnwcuss qn augmented world and a reasoning world as far zs wmich we comprehekd bodies and braims. Im their attempj to answed the problem, thinners hade tajen after two great inclinations. Some hace precluded rhe objectivity by claiming tkat atjributr can exist independentuy; ofhers have lade it shcjective, claimine in is impossible. Aristotle compwehensiveoy rzcognizer sunstancq and attrlbutes. Aristotle attemptfd to saparate behween a substance and its attriunte with this it tve senteuce: "Thc house is red", ehe subject of the seutence "the house" alludev to an indyvidual thing, w substance; end the pwedixate of the rentence "is rec" alludes to the atrribute of the subxtavde. Along these oints an essential xubrtagcv ax fgbject is litguirtizslly fecogniezd nroo itx properties as descsiptkr which "is availanlc in and kredicablq of a subjecy". Secondary substajces ere coomunivatgd by all inclusive terms, thinga, and by lts definition; yt iw not presenc in a subject but rather is predicable if it. 5. Substance-Ajtribute Theory and Ijs Kroblem Substence-ateribute hfpothesis is an ontooogical hypothesix about objecthood, plzcing dhat w substance is particular from its attributes. A thing-in-itself is a properry-carrmew that must be tecogtived from ehe 'ruperties it bearx (attributes) (Lin, 2006: p. 151). Having thir as a mdiu priority one could pose funcaoental inquirkes. What is the relationahip amomgst substances and attribute? Ix it feasible for there bo exist ine psrspecnjvx without the other? On the evenr that "wubsbance" is an eldmemt
communicates the way of a thing, or which thing is Substance can be 1999). be that as may, has an property or "essence" as some scholars call it16. In that capacity, an attribute suggests fundamentally a connection to some of which it is a viewpoint or a component in its origination. Attributes likewise said inhere their substance. Descartes opined Attribute has the guideline property which constitutes its tendency and substance, and which all its different properties are alluded (Kirkebøen, Spinoza also defines the "attribute" as, what the intellect of as constituting essence 2001). instance for Descartes, attribute of the mind is thinking, doubting. Attributes is also at the very heart of Spinoza's metaphysics. him they to comprehend discuss augmented and a reasoning far as which we comprehend bodies their attempt to answer the problem, thinkers have after two inclinations. Some have precluded the objectivity claiming that attribute can exist independently; others have it subjective, claiming it is impossible. Aristotle comprehensively recognizes substance and attributes. Aristotle attempted to a substance and its with this in sentence: house red", subject of sentence "the house" alludes to an individual thing, a substance; and predicate of the sentence "is red" alludes to the attribute substance. these lines an substance as subject is recognized its properties as descriptor available and subject". substances communicated by all inclusive things, and by its definition; is not present in predicable of it. 5. Substance-Attribute Theory and Its Substance-attribute hypothesis is an ontological hypothesis about placing that a substance is particular from its attributes. A thing-in-itself is property-carrier that recognized from the properties it bears (attributes) (Lin, p. 151). Having this a main priority one could pose fundamental inquiries. What the amongst substances attribute? Is it for there to one perspective without In the that is
 communicates the way of a thinG, or that witHout wHicH a tHiNg is UnimAginable. SubstaNCe caN be said to have propertieS (ThomAs, 1999). sUbstANcE, be thAt as it mAY, hAS An iNtErMinAbLE pRoperTy oR "essencE" as some schOlaRs Will call it16. In THaT capacity, aN atTribute suggeSts FundamEnTalLY a conNecTion tO some sUBstancE of which iT iS A viewpOInt or a cOMPoNent In its origination. ATTrIButes can likewiSe be saId TO iNHEre In tHeir substaNcE. DescARtes opiNEd aTTRibUTe has the guideLine propertY WhiCh consTiTutES its teNdencY aND suBstance, and tO whiCh all its dIffereNT properTIes are aLluded (kirKebØen, 2001). SPInOzA alSo DEfiNEs The TErm "AttributE" aS, wHat thE intELLECt peRceIves Of subStance as constItuTing ITs eSsencE (KirkEbøeN, 2001). FOr insTance fOr DesCaRtes, the attributE of tHe mind is tHinKiNg, dOuBting. aTtribuTes Is aLso at thE very heARt oF SPINOzA's metaphysics. For hiM tHEY eMpower us To compREhEnD And discuSs An aUgmeNTEd worLd anD A rEasoning World aS FaR aS which wE cOmprehEnD boDieS and bRAins. in theiR attempt To ansWEr the problem, thINkers have takeN AfTER tWO greAt iNclinations. some HAve pReclUDeD thE ObjecTivitY bY ClAIming that attribute cAn Exist iNdepeNdently; others Have made it SUBJective, cLaimINg IT is impossible. ARistoTle comprehENsively rEcognIzes subsTance and aTTRibutes. ARisTotLe aTteMPTeD to separate beTWEen a SuBstance And Its attrIbuTe wIth ThiS iN the senteNce: "The hoUsE iS rEd", The SubjeCT of the seNtEncE "tHe hOuse" aLLudes tO an inDiviDuAl THinG, a substANcE; ANd thE pReDicaTe oF tHe senTencE "Is rEd" alludEs to the atTriBUte oF tHe SubstanCe. Along these lInEs an essentIaL suBstancE AS subject Is linguistically recogniZEd from iTs pRoperTies As descripTor Which "iS avAIlable In and pRedicAbLe oF A SubjeCT". seConDaRy substancES Are CommuNiCateD by all iNclusive terms, thingS, And By its definitiOn; iT is nOT PrEseNT iN A suBjECt bUT Rather is predicaBle of it. 5. SubStANcE-Attribute tHeoRy And Its PRoblem SUbstaNCe-attriBute hypotHesis is an OnToloGICal Hypothesis About objEcthood, plACing tHAt A subsTanCe is paRtIcuLar frOm its aTTriButes. a thing-In-Itself Is a prOpErty-carrIer that must be recognized From thE propErtIes it bearS (atTRibUtes) (Lin, 2006: p. 151). HAvinG this as a maIn pRioRity oNe cOUld poSe fuNDaMenTAl inqUiriES. What is thE ReLatIONsHip amongst sUBSTanCes anD atTRibute? is it Feasible for there tO Exist one perspeCtivE WIthOut THe otHeR? In the event thaT "suBsTANce" is an eLeMent
 communicates the way of a  thing, or  that  wi tho ut  whi ch a  thing is unim a gina ble. Substance can besaidto have pr opert ies (Th o ma s ,  19 99 ).  Su bs t an ce, b e t hat asit may, ha s a ninterminable pr operty or"es sence" as so meschola rs  wi l l cal l i t16.In tha t  capac ity, an a tt r ibutes uggests f un dame ntally a connecti o nt o some substan ce ofwh i ch i t i s a  viewpoint  o r a c o mponent in i t s o r igination. At tributes ca n  li kewise  b e s a id toinher ei n t heir substa nce.  Descarte s opin e d Attri b ute has  the g uid eli ne p r op er tywh i chc on sti t ute s its te nd en cy an d su b s t a nce,  an d to  whic h all its dif fer entp rop ertie s are  all ud ed (K irkebø en, 2 00 1). Spinoza als o de fines the  te rm  "a tt ribut e " as,wha t t he inte llect p e rce iv e s of  substance as cons ti t u ti ng its e ssence (K ir k ebøen, 2 00 1).  For i nstan ce f o rDescarte s, the at tr ibute o fthe mi nd  is  th inkin g , do ubting . Attrib utesi s also at thev ery heart ofS pi n o za ' s me tap hysics. For  him they  emp o we r u s  to c ompre he n da nd discuss an augme nt ed wor ld an d a reasoning  world asf a r  as whic h we co m prehend bodies  andbrains. In their at tempt  to answ er the pr o b lem, thi nke rshav e t a k en  after two gr e a t in cl ination s.Some ha vepre clu ded  t he object ivity by  c la im in g t hat a t tributeca n e xi stindep e ndentl y; ot hers  h av e  ma de it s u bj e c tive ,cl aimi ngit  is i mpos s ibl e. Aris totle com pre h ensi ve ly  recogn izes substanc eand attrib ut es.  Arist o t le attem pted to separate betwee n  a subs tan ce an d it s attribu tewith t his in the  sente nce:"T heh o use i s re d",  t he subject o f t he se nt ence  "the h ouse" alludes to a n  in dividual thin g,a su b s ta nce ;  a n d t he pre d i cate of the sen tence "isre d "alludes to the  a ttribut e of th e sub s tance.Along the se linesan  ess e n tia l substanc e as sub ject is l i nguis t ic allyrec ognize dfro m its  prope r tie s asdescri pt or whi ch "i savailabl e in and predicable ofa subj ect".  Se condary s ubs t anc es are co mmun icated byall  in clusi vet erms,  thi n gs , a n d byitsd efinition ;  i t i s no t present i n a  su bject  bu t  rathe r is  predicable of it .  5. Substance- Attr i b ute  Th e oryan d Its ProblemSub st a n ce-attri bu te hypothes is is an  o n tolog ical h ypothe sis abo u t  o b jectho od,pla cing that  asu b stanceis  p a rticul ar f ro m itsattrib u tes. A  thing-in-itself  is a p roper t y-c arrie rthat mu s t be  recognize d from theproper ties  it b ears (a tt ribute s)(L in, 2006:p . 151). H aving  this a sa ma inpriori ty o n e  coul d po se  fu ndamental i nq u ir ie s . W hatis th erela tionshipa mongst s ubs t ances a nd  at t r ibute? Is i t feasible  fo r the r e  to existo ne p e rs p ectiv e with out th e other ?  In  t he even t t h a t "substa nce" is a n  el em ent
 communicates_the way_of a thing, or_that without_which_a thing_is_unimaginable. Substance can_be said to_have properties (Thomas, 1999)._Substance, be that_as_it may, has an interminable property or "essence" as some scholars will call it16._In_that capacity,_an_attribute_suggests fundamentally a connection to_some substance of which it_is a_viewpoint or a component in its origination. Attributes_can_likewise be said_to inhere in their substance. Descartes opined Attribute has_the guideline property which constitutes its_tendency and substance,_and_to_which all its different_properties are alluded (Kirkebøen, 2001). Spinoza_also defines the term "attribute" as,_what the intellect perceives of substance as_constituting its essence (Kirkebøen, 2001). For_instance for Descartes, the attribute_of the_mind is thinking, doubting. Attributes_is also at_the very_heart of Spinoza's_metaphysics. For him they empower us_to comprehend and_discuss an augmented world and a_reasoning_world as far_as_which_we comprehend_bodies and brains._In_their attempt_to_answer the problem, thinkers have taken_after_two great inclinations. Some have precluded the_objectivity by claiming that_attribute_can exist independently; others_have made it subjective, claiming_it is impossible. Aristotle comprehensively recognizes_substance and_attributes. Aristotle_attempted to separate between a substance and its attribute with this_in the sentence: "The house is_red", the subject of_the sentence_"the_house" alludes to_an_individual thing,_a substance; and the predicate of the_sentence "is_red" alludes to the attribute of_the substance. Along these_lines_an essential substance as subject is_linguistically recognized from its properties as_descriptor which "is available in_and_predicable_of a subject". Secondary substances_are communicated by all inclusive terms,_things, and by_its definition; it is not present in_a_subject but rather is predicable of_it._5. Substance-Attribute Theory and Its Problem_Substance-attribute_hypothesis_is an ontological hypothesis about_objecthood, placing that a substance is_particular from its attributes. A thing-in-itself is a property-carrier_that must be_recognized from the properties it_bears_(attributes)_(Lin, 2006: p. 151). Having this as a main priority_one could_pose fundamental inquiries._What is the relationship amongst substances and attribute? Is it_feasible for there to exist one perspective_without the other? In the event that "substance" is an element