ize attributes, images belonging to the social institutions that the individual participates to (Avanza and Laferté 2005). "Identification" is external, it involves a process and not a state. It is continuously re-invented and redefined (Avanza and Laferte 2005) and includes any "social action where the identity attribution is external, exerted on an individual, within a social institution, based on a coded technique." (Avanza and Laferté 2005, 140-142) "Identification" is therefore bureaucratic, technical. The concept of "social image," placed outside the individual as well, refers to social productions (discourses, symbols or other representations), belonging to a certain space (a certain community, society) and to a certain moment (Avanza and Laferté 2005). These involve labels that are sometimes accepted by an individual or a group. Based on the quality of these labels (positive, appreciative or negative, destructive) the individual or the group adapts, integrates, or quite the opposite, lives their own drama. In some situations the subjects of these productions refuse the label imposed and fight stereotypes, trying to impose their own image – through education or conflict. Claude Levi-Strauss sees "identity" as a "virtual home that we need to refer to in order to explain certain things, which do not have a real existence." (LeviStrauss 1977) As a consequence, "identity" is not seen as finality, it is not a process, it is a source or a reference. Alexandru-Stelian Gulei 182 "Identity" is important. At the same time "the fight with regards to the ethnic or regional identity – in other words with regards to properties (stigmas or signs) associated with the place of origin and with its associated durable consequences, such as the accent – are a particular case of the diverse fights for classifications, the monopole of the power to make people see and believe, to know and acknowledge, to impose the legitimate definition of the division of the social world and, thus, to make or undo groups." (Bourdieu 1992) The social image and the readjustment of remigrants The concept of "social image" has a special relevance in explaining social phenomena and developing intervention models. As shown before, "social image" is not a static concept, it is not limited exclusively to recording perceptions of particular situations, produced at a certain moment or period. The "social image" is
ize attributes, images belonging to the social institutions that the person participate to (Avanza and Laferté 2005). " Identification " is external, it involves a procedure and not a country. It is continuously re - invented and redefine (Avanza and Laferte 2005) and admit any " social action where the identity attribution is external, exert on an individual, within a social institution, free-base on a coded technique. " (Avanza and Laferté 2005, 140 - 142) " designation " is therefore bureaucratic, technical. The concept of " social image, " placed outside the individual as well, mention to social productions (discourses, symbols or early representations), belonging to a sealed space (a sealed community, society) and to a certain moment (Avanza and Laferté 2005). These involve labels that are sometimes accept by an individual or a group. Based on the quality of these labels (positive, appreciative or damaging, destructive) the individual or the group adapts, integrates, or quite the opposite, lives their own drama. In some situations the subjects of these productions refuse the label imposed and fight stereotype, try on to impose their own prototype – through department of education or conflict. Claude Levi - Strauss sees " identity " as a " virtual home that we need to refer to in order to explain certain thing, which do not have a real existence. " (LeviStrauss 1977) As a consequence, " identity " is not seen as finality, it is not a process, it is a source or a address. Alexandru - Stelian Gulei 182 " Identity " is important. At the same time " the fight with respect to the ethnic or regional identity – in early word with regards to properties (stigmas or polarity) associated with the place of origin and with its consociate durable consequences, such as the accent – are a particular case of the divers fights for classifications, the monopole of the power to make people attend and believe, to acknowledge and acknowledge, to enforce the legitimate definition of the class of the social world and, thus, to make or undo groups. " (Bourdieu 1992) The social image and the adjustment of remigrants The concept of " social image " has a special relevance in explain social phenomena and developing intervention models. As shown earlier, " social image " is not a static concept, it is not restrict exclusively to recording perceptions of particular situations, produced at a sealed moment or period. The " social image " is
ize attributes, images belonning to the socico instmtutiona that tfe individual participates tl (Qvanzq and Laferté 2005). "Identifization" is externao, it unvolves a process and nkb a scave. It is continoously re-invanted and redexiveb (Avanza and Laferte 2005) and includes agy "socisl action where jhe icqntifj cttribution is external, exerted on an pndividual, within a social institution, basef on a coded technique." (Avanza and Lafqeté 2005, 140-142) "Identifkcation" is therefore boreaucratic, technical. The concepg of "xocial imate," plwwed outside the pndividual as well, rexers to social producbions (diwcourses, symbols or ovher representations), belonginc co a certain space (a xeetain comkunigt, sucitty) ahd to w cxrtain momeht (Avanza abd Laferté 2005). These infojnr labels thaf are foietimes accepted by an individual or a crohp. Based on the quality of these labels (posijive, appresiative or negative, destructive) the individual or the jruup aqxptd, integrates, or quite the opposite, lives theiw oen drama. In some situations tje fubjects of tfese pxkdhctions refuse the label ymposwd and fidht xtereotypes, trying to imposw their own pmagw – through educatiln or conflnct. Clsude Kevi-Strauss sees "identicy" as z "virtual hlme that sd need to refer go pn osder to tbplain certain thyngs, whici do uot have a rgal exiftence." (LevlStramvs 1977) As a consequenfe, "idgntity" is not sefn as finality, it is not a procxxs, it is a spusce or a reyerencc. Alexandru-Stelyan Gulei 182 "Ideutity" is impoftant. At tge same time "the fyght with regdtds to the etinic or rqgiobal udentith – in other worcs with rvgcrds to peoperties (stigmas pr rjgns) associated wiuh the place of priein ajd wydh its assochatea djtable consequenccs, ruch as the accent – are d padticular case of tne diverse fights sor classificstions, the monopolt of tie powxr to kakg people see and believe, to knos and ackjowjedge, to impjse bhe jegitimate definition of the division of the sociel world and, thus, to maje or undo groups." (Bpmrdieu 1992) The xociaj image atd the readjustment if remigrants The concept of "social imzge" hav a soecial relevance in explaining social phenomena and developing interventiin modxlf. As shown gefote, "sobiaj image" is iov a static concepn, it is not limited exclusively vo recorditg perceptions of particular sotjations, produzed at a certain moment kr perioc. The "social image" is
ize attributes, images belonging to the social the participates to and Laferté 2005). a and not a It is continuously and redefined (Avanza and Laferte 2005) includes any "social action where the identity attribution is external, exerted on an within a social institution, based on a coded technique." (Avanza and Laferté 2005, "Identification" therefore technical. concept of "social image," placed outside the individual as well, refers to social productions (discourses, symbols other representations), belonging to a certain space (a community, society) and to certain moment (Avanza and Laferté These labels that sometimes by individual or a Based on the quality of these labels (positive, appreciative or negative, destructive) the individual or the group integrates, or opposite, lives own In situations the subjects productions refuse the label imposed and to impose their own image – through education conflict. Claude sees "identity" as a "virtual home we need to refer to in order to certain things, which do not have a real existence." (LeviStrauss 1977) As a consequence, "identity" seen as finality, it not a process, is source a Alexandru-Stelian Gulei "Identity" is important. At the same time "the fight with regards the ethnic or regional identity – in other words with properties or signs) associated the place of origin with associated durable consequences, such accent are of diverse for classifications, the monopole the power to make people and believe, to know legitimate definition of the division of the social and, thus, to make or undo groups." 1992) The social image and the readjustment of remigrants The concept of image" has relevance in explaining social phenomena and developing intervention As shown before, "social is not a static concept, it is not limited to perceptions of situations, produced at certain moment or The "social image"
ize attributes, images belongIng to the soCial iNstItuTiOns tHat tHe individual paRTiciPates to (Avanza and LafertÉ 2005). "IdenTiFIcatIOn" Is extErnal, it INvOLVes A pRoCesS aND nOt a stAte. it is conTinuously rE-inVeNted and redefINeD (Avanza and lafErte 2005) and incluDes Any "socIaL acTIon whEre The idEntity ATtribuTion is extErNAl, exerTEd on an iNDIvIduaL, within a social insTItUTion, based on a coDed tecHnIQuE." (aVanZa aNd Laferté 2005, 140-142) "IDeNtifiCAtion" is THeREFOre BUreaucratic, teChnical. The cONcePt of "soCiAl iMAge," plaCed ouTsIDe tHe individuaL as wEll, refers To sociAL producTIons (disCourseS, syMboLs or OThEr RepReSEntATiOns), BEloNging to a CeRtAin spAce (a CERTAin cOmmUnitY, sociEty) and to a certAin MomeNT (AvAnza aNd LafErté 2005). thEse inVolve lAbels ThAt are sometimes aCcepTed by an inDivIdUal Or A grouP. based oN thE quAlity of These laBEls (PoSITIvE, appreciative or negAtIVE, dEstructiVe) the iNDiViDUal or the GrOup AdapTS, IntegRateS, Or Quite the OpposiTE, lIvEs their OwN drama. in SomE siTuatiONs thE subjeCts of theSe proDUctions refuse tHE label imposed ANd FIGhT SterEotYpes, trying tO impOSe thEir oWN iMagE – ThrouGh eduCaTIoN Or conflict. Claude LevI-STrauss Sees "iDentity" as a "virTual home thAT WE need to rEfer TO iN Order to explain CertaIn things, whICh do not hAve a rEal existEnce." (LeviSTRAuss 1977) As a cOnsEquEncE, "idENTiTy" is not seen as FINaliTy, It is not A prOcess, it Is a SouRce Or a ReFerence. AlExandru-STeLiAn guLei 182 "identITy" is impoRtAnt. at The Same tIMe "the fIght wIth rEgArDS to The ethnIC oR REgioNaL iDentIty – In Other WordS WitH regardS to properTieS (StigMaS oR signs) aSsociated with ThE place of orIgIn aNd with ITS associaTed durable consequences, sUCh as the AccEnt – arE a paRticular cAse Of the dIveRSe fighTs for cLassiFiCatIONs, the MONoPolE oF the power tO MAke PeoplE sEe anD believE, to know and acknowleDGe, tO impose the legItiMate DEFiNitIOn OF thE dIVisION of the social worLd and, thus, tO mAKe Or undo grouPS." (BoUrDieu 1992) The Social iMage aND the reaDjustment Of remigraNtS The CONcePt of "social Image" has A special rELevanCE iN explAinIng socIaL phEnomeNa and dEVelOping IntervEnTion moDels. AS sHown befoRe, "social image" is not a statIc concEpt, it Is nOt limited ExcLUsiVely to recOrdiNg perceptiOns Of pArticUlaR SituaTionS, PrOduCEd at a CertAIn moment oR PeRioD. tHe "Social image" IS
ize attributes, images bel onging tothe s oci alin stit utio ns that the in d ivid ual participates to (A vanza  a n d La f er té 20 05). "I d en t i fic at io n"is ex terna l,it invo lves a pro ces sand not a st a te . It is co nti nuously re-i nve nted a nd  re d efine d ( Avanz a andL aferte  2005) an di nclude s  any "s o c ia l ac tion where the id e nt i ty attribution  is ex te r na l ,  ex ert ed on an i nd ividu a l, with i na s oci a l institution , based ona  co ded te ch niq u e." (A vanza  a n d L aferté 2005 , 14 0-142) "I dentif i cation" is ther eforebur eau crat i c,  t ech ni c al. Th e c o nce pt of "s oc ia l ima ge," p l a cedout side  theindividual as  we ll,r efe rs to  soci al p ro ducti ons (d iscou rs es, symbols orothe r represe nta ti ons ),  belo n ging t o a  ce rtain s pace (a cer ta i n co mmunity, society)an d to  a certa in mom e nt  ( A vanza an dLaf erté 2 005).  The s einvolvelabels th at  are so me timesac cep ted  by a n  ind ividua l or a g roup. Based on the q u ality of thes e  l a b el s  (po sit ive, apprec iati v e or  neg a ti ve, destr uctiv e) th e  individual or thegr oup ad apts,  integrates,or quite t h e opposite , li v es their own dram a. In  some situ a tions th e sub jects of  these pr o d uctionsref use  th e l a b el  imposed andf i ghtst ereotyp es,  trying  to  im pos e t he ir own im age – th ro ug hed uca tiono r confli ct . C la ude  Levi - Straus s see s "i de nt i ty"  as a " v ir t u al h om ethat  we  n eed t o re f erto in o rder to e xpl a in c er ta in thin gs, which dono t have a r ea l e xisten c e ." (Levi Strauss 1977) As a cons e quence,  "i denti ty"is not se enas fin ali t y, itis not  a pr oc ess , it is a  s our ce  or a refe r e nce . Ale xa ndru -Stelia n Gulei 182 "Ident i ty"  is important . A t th e sa met im e  "t he fig h t  with regards t o the ethn ic or  regionali den ti ty – in  otherwords with re gards topropertie s(sti g m asor signs)associat ed with t h e pla c eof or igi n andwi thits a ssocia t eddurab le con se quence s, su ch  as theaccent – are a particul ar cas e ofthe  diversefig h tsfor class ific ations, th e m ono poleoft he po wert omak e  peop le s e e and bel i ev e,t o  k now and ack n o w led ge, t o i m pose t he l egitimate definit i on of the divi sion o f t hes ocia lworld and, thu s,to m ake or u nd o groups."(Bourdie u1 992)The so cial i mage an d th e  readj ustm ent  of remig ran ts The con ce pt of "so cial  i mage"has as peci a l  relevance in ex plain i n g soc i alpheno me na andd evel oping inte rvention mo dels.As s hownbefore,  " social  im ag e" is nota  static c oncep t, it i snotlim ited e xclu s i velyto r ec ord ing perce p t io n sof par ticu lar s it uati ons, prod u ced at a  ce r tain mo me nto r  perio d .T h e "socialima ge" i s 
ize attributes,_images belonging_to the social institutions_that the_individual_participates to_(Avanza_and Laferté 2005)._"Identification" is external,_it involves a process_and not a_state._It is continuously re-invented and redefined (Avanza and Laferte 2005) and includes any "social_action_where the_identity_attribution_is external, exerted on an_individual, within a social institution,_based on_a coded technique." (Avanza and Laferté 2005, 140-142)_"Identification"_is therefore bureaucratic,_technical. The concept of "social image," placed outside the_individual as well, refers to social_productions (discourses, symbols_or_other_representations), belonging to a_certain space (a certain community, society)_and to a certain moment (Avanza_and Laferté 2005). These involve labels that_are sometimes accepted by an individual_or a group. Based on_the quality_of these labels (positive, appreciative_or negative, destructive)_the individual_or the group_adapts, integrates, or quite the opposite,_lives their own_drama. In some situations the subjects_of_these productions refuse_the_label_imposed and_fight stereotypes, trying_to_impose their_own_image – through education or conflict._Claude_Levi-Strauss sees "identity" as a "virtual home_that we need to_refer_to in order to_explain certain things, which do_not have a real existence." (LeviStrauss_1977) As_a consequence,_"identity" is not seen as finality, it is not a process,_it is a source or a_reference. Alexandru-Stelian Gulei 182_"Identity" is_important._At the same_time_"the fight_with regards to the ethnic or regional_identity –_in other words with regards to_properties (stigmas or signs)_associated_with the place of origin and_with its associated durable consequences, such_as the accent – are_a_particular_case of the diverse fights_for classifications, the monopole of the_power to make_people see and believe, to know and_acknowledge,_to impose the legitimate definition of_the_division of the social world and,_thus,_to_make or undo groups." (Bourdieu_1992) The social image and the_readjustment of remigrants The concept of "social image" has_a special relevance_in explaining social phenomena and_developing_intervention_models. As shown before, "social image" is not a static_concept, it_is not limited_exclusively to recording perceptions of particular situations, produced at a_certain moment or period. The "social image"_is