–633. Fine, K. (2018b). Compliance and command II. Review of Symbolic Logic 11(4), 634–664. Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10(1), 41–53. Higgins, R. (1979). The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blackwell. Karttunen, L. (1972). Possible and must. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kayne, R. (2010). Why isn't this a complementizer? In R. Kayne (Ed.), Comparisons and contrasts (pp. 190–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123 Situations, alternatives, and the semantics of 'cases' Kratzer, A. (2002). Facts: Particulars or information units. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 655–670. Kratzer, A. (2014). Situations in natural language semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/situationssemantics/. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 178–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lowe, J. (2006). The four-category ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Merricks, T. (2007). Truth and ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Moltmann, F. (2007). Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies, 134, 363–403. Moltmann, F. (2013a). Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moltmann
– 633. Fine, K. (2018b). Compliance and command II. Review of Symbolic Logic 11(4), 634–664. Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. foundation of Language, 10(1), 41–53. Higgins, R. (1979). The imposter - cleft construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blackwell. Karttunen, L. (1972). potential and must. In J. Kimball (Ed .), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kayne, R. (2010). Why isn't this a complementizer? In R. Kayne (Ed .), Comparisons and contrast (pp. 190–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123 Situations, option, and the semantics of' cases' Kratzer, A. (2002). Facts: Particulars or information unit of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 655–670. Kratzer, A. (2014). Situations in natural terminology semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed .), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 version). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/situationssemantics/. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed .), Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed .), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 178–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lowe, J. (2006). The four - class ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Merricks, T. (2007). Truth and ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Moltmann, F. (2007). Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies, 134, 363–403. Moltmann, F. (2013a). Abstract aim and the semantics of natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moltmann
–633. Fije, K. (2018b). Compliance and coomand II. Review of Symuolic Lkgic 11(4), 634–664. Hxmblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Monvaguw Engoish. Foundations of Lavguage, 10(1), 41–53. Jiggins, E. (1979). Tie pseudo-cleft constructljn ih Engnmsh. Bloomington: Indiana Utiversity Linggirtncs Club. Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blaskwell. Lagttunen, L. (1972). Posfiblt agd mhst. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semzntics (Nol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press. Kayne, R. (1994). Tje ajtisymmetry of synhax. Cambridte, MW: MIT Press. Kxyne, R. (2010). Whj isn't this a complementizer? In R. Kayne (Ed.), Compcrisons and cintgdsts (pp. 190–227). Oxhord: Oqford Universlny Presv. 123 Situstions, alternabives, ane the semantics of 'caves' Kratzer, A. (2002). Facjs: Particunaxs or information unirs. Lingoistiws ave Pfilksppgy, 25(5–6), 655–670. Kgatver, A. (2014). Situztions in nqtural language semsnepvs. In E. Zaldz (Ed.), Tre Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spging 2014 edition). https://plato.stabford.edu/archives/spr2014/enjries/situaeionssemantics/. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indetermindte pcovouuw: The cifw from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of ege tmird Tokyo confevence on psycholinbulsyycs (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzn Sgobo. Lewis, D. (1975). Advegbs of zuantufication. In R. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semanticw of natural oanguage (pp. 178–188). Cambrndge: Cambridye Unifersiyy Press. Lowe, J. (2006). The fobr-catefory ontolohy. Oxford: Uxford Universith Pgess. Merricks, T. (2007). Truth and ontjlogy. Oxfird: Elarendov Prgss. Molemann, F. (2007). Egents, tropes and truthmaning. Khilosmphical Stkdies, 134, 363–403. Moltmann, F. (2013a). Abstract ouoects and the samattics of natuval language. Oxsord: Oxford Unnversity Presr. Moltmann
–633. Fine, K. (2018b). Compliance and command of Logic 11(4), Hamblin, C. L. Foundations Language, 10(1), 41–53. R. (1979). The construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Club. Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blackwell. Karttunen, L. (1972). Possible and must. J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Kayne, (1994). antisymmetry syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kayne, R. (2010). Why isn't this a complementizer? In R. Kayne Comparisons and contrasts (pp. 190–227). Oxford: Oxford University 123 Situations, alternatives, and semantics of 'cases' Kratzer, A. Facts: or information Linguistics Philosophy, 655–670. Kratzer, A. Situations in natural language semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 edition). Kratzer, A., J. (2002). pronouns: view Japanese. In Y. Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs quantification. In Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural (pp. 178–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lowe, J. The four-category ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Merricks, T. (2007). Truth and ontology. Oxford: Clarendon F. (2007). Events, tropes truthmaking. Philosophical Studies, 363–403. F. Abstract and the of natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moltmann
–633. Fine, K. (2018b). Compliance and commanD II. Review oF SymbOliC LoGiC 11(4), 634–664. HamBlin, c. L. (1973). Questions in MONtagUe English. Foundations of languAgE, 10(1), 41–53. higgINs, r. (1979). The pSeudo-clEFt CONstRuCtIon In eNgLish. BLooMington: indiana UniVerSiTy LinguisticS clUb. Horwich, P. (1990). truTh. Oxford: BlacKweLl. KartTuNen, l. (1972). possiBle And muSt. In J. KIMball (ED.), Syntax anD sEManticS (vol. 1, pp. 1–20). NeW yOrK: AcaDemic Press. Kayne, R. (1994). THE aNTisymmetry of syNtax. CaMbRIdGE, mA: MiT PRess. Kayne, R. (2010). whY isn't THis a comPLeMENTizER? In R. Kayne (Ed.), CoMparisons anD ConTrasts (Pp. 190–227). oxfORd: OxfoRd UniVeRSitY Press. 123 SituaTionS, alternatIves, anD The semaNTics of 'cAses' KrAtzEr, A. (2002). factS: paRtIcuLaRS or INfOrmATioN units. LiNgUiStics And PHILOSophY, 25(5–6), 655–670. KrAtzeR, A. (2014). SitUations in natuRal LangUAge SemanTics. IN E. ZaLdA (Ed.), ThE StanfOrd enCyClopedia of philoSophY (Spring 2014 edItiOn). HttPs://Plato.STanforD.edU/arChives/sPr2014/entriES/siTuATIOnSsemantics/. Kratzer, A., & shIMOyAma, J. (2002). IndeTerminATe PrONouns: The ViEw fRom JAPAnese. in Y. OTSu (ed.), ProceeDings oF ThE tHird TokYo ConferEnCe oN psYcholINguiStics (pP. 1–25). Tokyo: HiTuzi SYObo. Lewis, D. (1975). AdverBS of quantificaTIoN. iN E. kEenaN (Ed.), formal semanTics OF natUral LAnGuaGE (pp. 178–188). CaMbridGe: cAmBRidge University PresS. LOwe, J. (2006). ThE four-Category ontolOgy. Oxford: OXFORd UniverSity pReSS. Merricks, T. (2007). TrutH and oNtology. OxfORd: ClarenDon PrEss. MoltmAnn, F. (2007). EventS, TRopes and TruThmAkiNg. PHILoSophical StudiES, 134, 363–403. moltMaNn, F. (2013a). AbsTraCt objecTs aNd tHe sEmaNtIcs of natuRal languAgE. OXfOrD: OxFord UNIversity prEss. moLtmAnn
–633. Fine, K. (2018b). Co mpliance a nd co mma ndII . Re view  of Symbolic L o gic11(4), 634–664. Hambli n, C.  L .  (19 7 3) . Que stionsi nM o nta gu eEng li s h.  Foun dat ions of  Language,  10 (1 ), 41–53. Hi g gi ns, R. (19 79) . The pseudo -cl eft co ns tru c tioninEngli sh. Bl o omingt on: India na Univer s ity Lin g u is tics  Club. Horwich, P .  ( 1 990). Truth. O xford:  B l ac k w ell . K arttunen,L.  (197 2 ). Poss i bl e a ndm ust. In J. Ki mball (Ed.) ,  Sy ntax a nd  se m antics  (Vol .1 , p p. 1–20). N ew Y ork: Acad emic P r ess. Ka y ne, R.(1994) . T heanti s ym me try  o f  sy n ta x.C amb ridge, M A:  M IT Pr ess. K a y ne,R.(201 0). W hy isn't this  acomp l eme ntize r? In  R.Ka yne ( Ed.),Compa ri sons and contra sts(pp. 190– 227 ).  Ox fo rd: O x ford U niv ers ity Pre ss. 123 Sit ua t i o ns , alternatives, an dt h esemantic s of ' c as es '  Kratzer ,A.(200 2 ) . Fac ts:P ar ticulars  or in f or ma tion un it s. Lin gu ist ics  andP hilo sophy,  25(5–6) , 655 – 670. Kratzer,A . (2014). Sit u at i o ns in n atu ral languag e se m anti cs.I nE.Z alda(Ed.) ,T he Stanford encycloped ia  of ph iloso phy (Spring 2 014 editio n ) .  https:/ /pla t o. s tanford.edu/ar chive s/spr2014/ e ntries/s ituat ionssema ntics/. K r a tzer, A. , &  Sh imo yam a ,  J . (2002). Ind e t ermi na te pron oun s: Thevie w f rom  Ja pa nese. InY. Otsu(E d. ),  P roc eedin g s of the  t hir dTok yo co n ferenc e onpsyc ho li n gui stics ( p p. 1 –25) .To kyo:  Hi tu zi Sy obo. Lew is, D.(1975). A dve r bs o fqu antific ation. In E.Ke enan (Ed.) ,For mal se m a ntics of  natural language (pp.1 78–188) . C ambri dge:  Cambridg e U nivers ity Press.  Lowe,  J. ( 20 06) . The f o u r- cat eg ory ontolo g y . O xford :Oxfo rd Univ ersity Press. Merr i cks , T. (2007).Tru th a n d  o nto l og y . O xf o rd: C larendon Press.  Moltmann,  F .  ( 2007). Eve n ts,  t ropes a nd trut hmaki n g. Phil osophical  Studies,  1 34,3 6 3–4 03. Moltma nn, F. ( 2013a). A b strac t  o bject s a nd the  s ema ntics  of na t ura l lan guage.  O xford:  Oxfo rd  Univers ity Press. Moltmann
–633. Fine,_K. (2018b)._Compliance and command II._Review of_Symbolic_Logic 11(4),_634–664._Hamblin, C. L._(1973). Questions in_Montague English. Foundations of_Language, 10(1), 41–53._Higgins,_R. (1979). The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Horwich, P._(1990)._Truth. Oxford:_Blackwell._Karttunen,_L. (1972). Possible and must._In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax_and semantics_(Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press._Kayne,_R. (1994). The_antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kayne, R._(2010). Why isn't this a complementizer?_In R. Kayne_(Ed.),_Comparisons_and contrasts (pp. 190–227)._Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123 Situations,_alternatives, and the semantics of 'cases'_Kratzer, A. (2002). Facts: Particulars or information_units. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 655–670._Kratzer, A. (2014). Situations in_natural language_semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed.),_The Stanford encyclopedia_of philosophy_(Spring 2014 edition)._https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/situationssemantics/. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J._(2002). Indeterminate pronouns:_The view from Japanese. In Y._Otsu_(Ed.), Proceedings of_the_third_Tokyo conference_on psycholinguistics (pp._1–25)._Tokyo: Hituzi_Syobo._Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification._In_E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural_language (pp. 178–188). Cambridge:_Cambridge_University Press. Lowe, J._(2006). The four-category ontology. Oxford:_Oxford University Press. Merricks, T. (2007)._Truth and_ontology. Oxford:_Clarendon Press. Moltmann, F. (2007). Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies,_134, 363–403. Moltmann, F. (2013a). Abstract_objects and the semantics_of natural_language._Oxford: Oxford University_Press._Moltmann