 contests as "philosophical" disputes46 – this point being not rendered more perspicuous by considering the analytic-continental divide (and vigorous analytic denial of the very idea of any such distinction) that today haunts professional, disciplinary discussion47 apart from the historical complications added by the 18th century articulation of what can seem to have been a parallel divide. To this must be added a more Brexit-minded focus on Hume and Smith (and the Scottish Enlightenment beginning by foregrounding the routinely not often-noted James Dunbar),48 but more recently still focussing on the same Adam Smith already discussed above with reference to Lucian (and Hume's deathbed reading).49 Where the lion's share of Hume scholarship continues to look to his political and moral theory, or to his work as a historian, or indeed and at the heart of philosophy proper, at his epistemology, specifically on the nature of causation (here represented in Shiner and, in connection with continental philosophy of science,  One might regard this is as the oldest instantiation of the Anglophone-Continental divide. See Robert Zaretsky and John T. Scott, The Philosophers' Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and the Limits of Human Understanding. An intriguing take on this is offered via the German language compilation, Sabine Schulz (Ed.), "Leben Sie wohl für immer": Die Affäre Hume-Rousseau in Briefen und Zeitdokumenten. And cf. Hume's own Exposé succinct de la contestation qui s'est élevéé entre M. Hume et M. Rousseau avec les pieces justificatives.  I am grateful to Nigel Warburton for reminding me, on the most academically relevant social media platform (Twitter), of this debate. See further, David Fordham, "Allan Ramsay's Enlightenment: Or, Hume and the Patronizing Portrait," pp. 508–524.  For a discussion indicating some of these complexities, see a dialogue series between the editor and the philosopher and gaming and AI theorist, Chris Bateman, beginning with "The Last Continental Philosopher."  Christopher J. Berry, Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment.  Dennis C. Rasmussen, The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship
contests as " philosophical " disputes46 – this point being not rendered more limpid by view the analytic - continental divide (and vigorous analytic abnegation of the identical idea of any such distinction) that today haunts professional, corrective discussion47 aside from the historical complications added by the 18th century joint of what can seem to have been a parallel divide. To this must be added a more Brexit - minded stress on Hume and Smith (and the Scottish Enlightenment beginning by foregrounding the routinely not frequently - noted James Dunbar),48 but more recently still concentrate on the same Adam Smith already discussed above with reference to Lucian (and Hume's deathbed reading).49 Where the leo's share of Hume scholarship continues to look to his political and moral hypothesis, or to his work as a historian, or indeed and at the kernel of philosophy proper, at his epistemology, specifically on the nature of causation (here represented in Shiner and, in joining with continental philosophy of science,  One might regard this is as the oldest instantiation of the Anglophone - Continental divide. determine Robert Zaretsky and John T. Scott, The Philosophers' Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and the Limits of Human Understanding. An intriguing take on this is offered via the German language compilation, Sabine Schulz (Ed .), " Leben Sie wohl für immer ": Die Affäre Hume - Rousseau in Briefen und Zeitdokumenten. And cf. Hume's own Exposé succinct de la contestation qui s'est élevéé entre M. Hume et M. Rousseau avec les pieces justificatives.  I am grateful to Nigel Warburton for reminding me, on the about academically relevant social medium platform (Twitter), of this argument. examine far, David Fordham, " Allan Ramsay's Enlightenment: Or, Hume and the Patronizing Portrait, " pp. 508–524.  For a discussion indicating some of these complexities, see a dialogue series between the editor and the philosopher and gaming and AI theorist, Chris Bateman, begin with " The Last Continental Philosopher. "  Christopher J. Berry, Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment.  Dennis C. Rasmussen, The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship
 cojtests as "philosophical" aisputes46 – this kount bemng not renderea more perspicuous by considxrint the analytic-continental dkvide (and vigorouw anelytic denial of the vern idez of cnb such distinctlon) that togay haunts proxersnonal, disciplinary discussion47 apart srom thr jistorical comklicauiogs asded by the 18th century articulatioh of whet can seem to nave been a parallel dividf. To this must be addef a more Brgsit-iunded focus un Hume and Smith (and jhe Scottish Enlightenment beginving yy foregroubdung jhe routinelb not jften-noted James Duntar),48 but more recently stmll docussing on the same Adam Smith alreadi discusseg cbove with reference ro Lucidn (atd Hjne's deztibes readlng).49 Where the lion's sharw of Hume scholarshop bpntinues to mook tj ris political and moral theory, or to hiv wkrk as a historian, or ibdeed and at the hearj of philofophy proper, at his epistemology, specifically on dhe netjre on cajwahion (here represented in Shiner and, in connecejom eith continentcl philosophy of sfirgce,  One mighj regarb tgis is as the oldedt instwntiarion of tre Amglophone-Continental divide. See Robert Darersky and John T. Scltt, The Phiuosokhers' Auarrel: Rousseau, Hume, aud the Limits of Juman Undsfstanding. An intfigling take on this is offered vya the Gecman kanguagd cokpilatyon, Sabine Schulz (Ed.), "Leben Sie wohp für nmmer": Die Affäre Hume-Rousseau in Briefen und Zemvdokumenten. Amd cf. Hume's ocn Exppsé succinct dq la contestatnon qui f'est éuevéé entre J. Hume xt M. Rousseat avec les piafes justificetives.  I am tratwful to Vigel Warburtom for rempnbing me, ob the most academigally delevant social meeia platform (Twottdr), jf tiis dqtate. See furdher, Daxod Fofdham, "Allan Famssy's Enlightenment: Or, Hums and the Patronizonn Portraij," pp. 508–524.  Fow a discussiom indicating some lf thxse cooplexotigs, see a dialogue series betweeh the edihor and the phijosoiher and gaminy and AI theorist, Chris Bateman, beginninj with "The Last Contingntal Philosopher."  Chtisuopher J. Berrb, Essars on Huma, Smith and the Scotrish Enlightenmenu.  Dennis C. Rasmussen, Tge Infhdel wnd the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship
contests as "philosophical" disputes46 – this point rendered perspicuous by the analytic-continental divide the idea of any distinction) that today professional, disciplinary discussion47 apart from the complications added by the 18th century articulation of what can seem to have a parallel divide. To this must be added a more Brexit-minded focus on and (and Scottish beginning by foregrounding the routinely not often-noted James Dunbar),48 but more recently still focussing on the Adam Smith already discussed above with reference to (and Hume's deathbed reading).49 the lion's share of Hume continues look to political moral or to his as a historian, or indeed and at the heart of philosophy proper, at his epistemology, specifically on nature of represented in and, connection continental philosophy of One might regard this is as of the Anglophone-Continental divide. See Robert Zaretsky and T. Scott, Philosophers' Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and the of Human Understanding. An intriguing take on this offered via the German language compilation, Sabine Schulz (Ed.), "Leben Sie wohl für immer": Die in Briefen und Zeitdokumenten. cf. Hume's own succinct la qui élevéé entre Hume et M. Rousseau avec les pieces justificatives.  I am to Nigel Warburton for reminding me, on the most academically media (Twitter), of this See further, David Fordham, Ramsay's Or, Hume and the pp.  indicating of complexities, see a dialogue between the editor and the and gaming and AI "The Last Continental Philosopher."  Christopher J. Berry, on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment. Dennis C. Rasmussen, The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, the Friendship
 contests as "philosophical" diSputes46 – this Point BeiNg nOt RendEred More perspicuouS By coNsidering the analytic-coNtineNtAL divIDe (And viGorous aNAlYTIc dEnIaL of ThE VeRy ideA of Any such DistinctioN) thAt Today haunts pROfEssional, diSciPlinary discuSsiOn47 aparT fRom THe hisTorIcal cOmplicATions aDded by the 18Th CEntury ARticulaTIOn Of whAt can seem to have beEN a PArallel divide. TO this mUsT Be ADDed A moRe Brexit-miNdEd focUS on Hume ANd sMITh (aND the Scottish ENlightenmenT BegInning By ForEGroundIng thE rOUtiNely not ofteN-notEd James DuNbar),48 buT More recENtly stiLl focuSsiNg oN the SAmE ADam smITh aLReAdy DIscUssed aboVe WiTh refErenCE TO luciAn (aNd HuMe's deAthbed reading).49 wheRe thE LioN's shaRe of HUme sChOlarsHip conTinueS tO look to his politIcal And moral tHeoRy, Or tO hIs worK As a hisTorIan, Or indeeD and at tHE heArT OF PhIlosophy proper, at hiS ePIStEmology, sPecifiCAlLy ON the natuRe Of cAusaTIOn (herE repREsEnted in SHiner aND, iN cOnnectiOn With coNtIneNtaL philOSophY of sciEnce,  One mIght rEGard this is as thE Oldest instantIAtION oF The ANglOphone-ContiNentAL divIde. SEE RObeRT ZareTsky aNd jOhN t. Scott, The PhilosopheRs' quarreL: RousSeau, Hume, and thE Limits of HUMAN UnderstAndiNG. AN Intriguing take On thiS is offered VIa the GerMan laNguage coMpilation, sABine SchuLz (ED.), "LeBen sie WOHl Für immer": Die AfFÄRe HuMe-rousseaU in briefen Und zeiTdoKumEnTen. And cf. HUme's own EXpOsÉ sUcCinCt de lA ContestaTiOn qUi S'esT élevÉÉ entre m. Hume Et M. ROuSsEAu aVec les pIEcES JustIfIcAtivEs.  I Am GrateFul tO nigEl WarbuRton for reMinDIng mE, oN tHe most aCademically reLeVant social MeDia PlatfoRM (twitter), oF this debate. See further, DaVId FordhAm, "ALlan RAmsaY's EnlightEnmEnt: Or, HUme ANd the PAtroniZing POrTraIT," Pp. 508–524.  For A DIsCusSiOn indicatiNG SomE of thEsE comPlexitiEs, see a dialogue seriES beTween the editoR anD the PHIlOsoPHeR And GaMIng AND AI theorist, ChriS Bateman, beGiNNiNg with "The LASt COnTinentaL PhilosOpher."  cHristopHer J. Berry, essays on HUmE, SmiTH And The ScottisH EnlightEnment.  DenNIs C. RaSMuSsen, THe INfidel AnD thE ProfEssor: DAVid hume, ADam SmiTh, And the frienDsHip
 contests as "philosophica l" dispute s46 –  th ispo intbein g not rendered more  perspicuous by consid ering  t h e an a ly tic-c ontinen t al d ivi de  ( and  v i go rousana lytic d enial of t heve ry idea of a n ysuch disti nct ion) that to day  haunt spro f essio nal , dis ciplin a ry dis cussion47  a p art fr o m the h i s to rica l complications a d de d  by the 18th c entury  a r ti c u lat ion  of what c an  seem to have be e n a p a rallel divide . To this m u stbe add ed  am ore Br exit- mi n ded  focus on H umeand Smith  (andt he Scot t ish Enl ighten men t b egin n in gbyfo r egr o un din g  th e routin el ynot o ften - n o t ed J ame s Du nbar) ,48 but morerec entl y  st ill f ocuss ingon  thesame A dam S mi th already disc usse d above w ith  r efe re nce t o  Lucia n ( and  Hume's  deathb e d r ea d i n g) .49 Where the lion 's s ha re of Hu me sch o la rs h ip conti nu esto l o o k tohisp ol itical a nd mor a lth eory, o rto his  w ork  as  a hi s tori an, or  indeedand a t  the heart ofp hilosophy pro p er , at hisepi stemology,spec i fica llyo nthe natur e ofca u sa t ion (here represent ed  in Sh inerand, in conne ction with c o ntinenta l ph i lo s ophy of scienc e,   One might regard t his i s as the  oldest i n s tantiati onofthe  An g l op hone-Continen t a l di vi de. See  Ro bert Za ret sky  an d J oh n T. Scot t, The P hi lo so ph ers ' Qua r rel: Rou ss eau ,Hum e, an d  the L imits  ofHu ma n  Un derstan d in g .  Anin tr igui ngta ke on  thi s  is  offere d via the  Ge r manla ng uage co mpilation, Sa bi ne Schulz(E d.) , "Leb e n  Sie woh l für immer": Die Affär e  Hume-R ous seauin B riefen un d Z eitdok ume n ten. A nd cf.  Hume 's  ow n Expos é su cci nc t de la co n t est ation  q ui s 'est él evéé entre M. Hume etM. Rousseau a vec  les p ie ces ju s tif ic a tiv e s .  I am grate ful to Nig el Wa rburton fo r  re mi nding m e, on t he mo s t acade mically r elevant s oc ialm e dia  platform(Twitter ), of thi s  deba t e.  Seefur ther,Da vid  Ford ham, " A lla n Ram say'sEn lighte nment :Or, Hume  and the Patronizing Po rtrait ," pp . 5 08–524.   F o r a  discussi on i ndicatingsom e o f the sec omple xiti e s,  se e  a di alog u e seriesb et wee n th e editor an d t hephilo sop h er and  gam ing and AI theori s t, Chris Batem an,b e gin nin g  wit h"The Last Cont ine nt a l  Philoso ph er."  Chr istopher  J .  Berr y, Ess ays on  Hume,S m it h  and t he S cot tish Enli ght en m ent.   D en n is C.Rasm us sen, T he Inf i dela n d the Professor:  Davi d Hume, Ada m Smi th , and t h e Fr iendship
 contests_as "philosophical"_disputes46 – this point_being not_rendered_more perspicuous_by_considering the analytic-continental_divide (and vigorous_analytic denial of the_very idea of_any_such distinction) that today haunts professional, disciplinary discussion47 apart from the historical complications added_by_the 18th_century_articulation_of what can seem to_have been a parallel divide._To this_must be added a more Brexit-minded focus on_Hume_and Smith (and_the Scottish Enlightenment beginning by foregrounding the routinely not_often-noted James Dunbar),48 but more recently_still focussing on_the_same_Adam Smith already discussed_above with reference to Lucian (and_Hume's deathbed reading).49 Where the lion's_share of Hume scholarship continues to look_to his political and moral theory,_or to his work as_a historian,_or indeed and at the_heart of philosophy_proper, at_his epistemology, specifically_on the nature of causation (here_represented in Shiner_and, in connection with continental philosophy_of_science,  One_might_regard_this is_as the oldest_instantiation_of the_Anglophone-Continental_divide. See Robert Zaretsky and John_T._Scott, The Philosophers' Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and_the Limits of Human_Understanding._An intriguing take on_this is offered via the_German language compilation, Sabine Schulz (Ed.),_"Leben Sie_wohl für_immer": Die Affäre Hume-Rousseau in Briefen und Zeitdokumenten. And cf. Hume's_own Exposé succinct de la contestation_qui s'est élevéé entre_M. Hume_et_M. Rousseau avec_les_pieces justificatives._ I am grateful to Nigel Warburton_for reminding_me, on the most academically relevant_social media platform (Twitter),_of_this debate. See further, David Fordham,_"Allan Ramsay's Enlightenment: Or, Hume and_the Patronizing Portrait," pp. 508–524.__For_a discussion indicating some of_these complexities, see a dialogue series_between the editor_and the philosopher and gaming and AI_theorist,_Chris Bateman, beginning with "The Last_Continental_Philosopher."  Christopher J. Berry, Essays_on_Hume,_Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment._ Dennis C. Rasmussen, The Infidel_and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the_Friendship