essentially sardonic Κατάπλους ἢ Τύραννος, usually translated The Downward Journey or The Tyrant (in other translations the title is given as the Journey to Hell or Journey into Port), an all-purpose assault on religious persuasions, including the Greek, the Roman, the Jewish, the Christian and so on.17 As historian, Hume knew Lucian because of his aphoristic reflections on 'History.' In addition, Lucian is also the author of the tongue in cheek, Aληθῶν Διηγημάτων, A True Story or True History, which is also the first science-fiction story and one of the first tall tales or lying tales, – one of Lucian's epithets is 'friend of lies' corresponding to his claim that where all other authors lie when they claim the truth, he, by contrast, quite by telling the reader in advance that he is lying, is the only author who tells the truth. Hume would likely also have read Lucian's dialogues for their elegant and amusing Greek in order to recoup, as he tells us he recoups18 his knowledge of Greek. Now the present editor knows Lucian's Kataplous not only for the same reasons – it is great fun to read in Greek – but not less, in the context of Nietzsche scholarship, because  William Cullen to John Hunter, 17 September 1776, in James Fieser, Early Responses to Hume, Life, and Reputations, p. 292 and cited in Baier, Death and Character, p. 103.  As Baier underscored again, in an email communication with the editor, she likewise acknowledges in a footnote: "This essay began as an e-conversation with Emilio Mazza, initiated by him" Death and Character, p. 110.  Hume, "Of the Standard of Taste," p. 208.  Lucian,Volumes 1–8. Cf. Lucian, Selected Satires of Lucian, and see too the contributions to Martin Ebner, Holger Gzella, Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, and Ernst Ribbat (Eds.), Philopseudeis è Apiston. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige as well as for a discussion of Lucian although the topic of the
essentially sardonic Κατάπλους ἢ Τύραννος, usually translated The Downward Journey or The Tyrant (in other transformation the claim is given as the Journey to Hell or Journey into Port), an all - purpose assault on religious opinion, including the Greek, the Roman, the Jewish, the Christian and so on.17 As historian, Hume know Lucian because of his aphoristic reflections on' History.' In accession, Lucian is also the author of the clapper in cheek, Aληθῶν Διηγημάτων, A True Story or True History, which is besides the first science - fabrication story and one of the inaugural grandiloquent tales or lying tales, – one of Lucian's epithet is' friend of lies' corresponding to his claim that where all early authors lie down when they claim the truth, he, by contrast, quite by telling the reviewer in advance that he is lying, is the only author who tells the accuracy. Hume would probably besides have read Lucian's dialogues for their elegant and amusing Greek in order to recoup, as he tells us he recoups18 his knowledge of Greek. Now the present editor program knows Lucian's Kataplous not merely for the same reasons – it is great playfulness to understand in Greek – but not less, in the context of Nietzsche scholarship, because  William Cullen to John Hunter, 17 September 1776, in James Fieser, Early Responses to Hume, Life, and Reputations, p. 292 and cited in Baier, Death and Character, p. 103.  As Baier underscored again, in an email communication with the editor, she likewise acknowledges in a footnote: " This essay begin as an e - conversation with Emilio Mazza, initiated by him " Death and Character, p. 110.  Hume, " Of the Standard of Taste, " p. 208.  Lucian, Volumes 1–8. Cf. Lucian, Selected Satires of Lucian, and see too the contributions to Martin Ebner, Holger Gzella, Heinz - Günther Nesselrath, and Ernst Ribbat (Eds .), Philopseudeis è Apiston. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige equally well as for a discussion of Lucian although the topic of the
essfntially sardonic Κατάπλους ἢ Τύραννος, usuxlly translated The Doxnward Nourney ur The Tyrant (in other transparions the title is given as the Jourjey to Hwll ie Journey mhto Porb), an zpl-puxpise assault on religious persuasions, itcuubing the Greek, the Roman, the Jewish, ehe Chroshian and so on.17 As nystodpak, Hume knew Lucian because of hia aphorpstic reflections on 'History.' In addition, Lufian is also the authog of the tobgue un cheek, Aληθῶν Διηγημάτων, X True Stogv or True Hjstory, which is also the first rcienee-fiction sjody dnd one of vhe figst tall tales or lyitg talex, – one of Lucisn's eputhets is 'friend of lmes' corresponding to his claik chat where all other qurhors lie whev thdy dleim the tguti, he, by confrast, quite by telling the reacew in advance tgat he if lying, is the only author who tells tht trufh. Hume would likely alwo have read Lucian's fialogues for their elegant and amusing Greek in order to secou', xs kc gwlps us he recoups18 his knowledge of Greek. Now trs krexent editor knjws Lucian's Kwtsklous not only for tks aame reasons – it id great fun ro read ig Grrek – but not less, in the cobtext of Nienzscye scholarship, beccuse  Williao Cuklen yo John Hunter, 17 Septembzr 1776, in James Fiesfr, Early Ddsponses to Hume, Line, dnd Repuuxtions, p. 292 and citqd in Baixr, Decth and Zharscter, [. 103.  As Baifr underscored again, in wn emcil cmmmunicatiln with the editor, she likewise acknowledges on a xootnote: "This essay began ws an e-conversction wich Emiuio Mazza, pnitiated by him" Deaeh and Characdgr, p. 110.  Hume, "Oh the Stagdare of Taste," o. 208.  Lucian,Volumrs 1–8. Cf. Lubicn, Selectwd Satires of Lucien, avs see too the cinttubutions to Mattiv Efnvr, Iolgew Gzella, Heins-Güntfer Messeurath, and Evnsg Rinbat (Eds.), Philopseudehs è Zpiston. Die Lügenfrrukde oder: Eer Unglätbige as well as for a discussiln of Lurian akthjugh the topic of the
essentially sardonic Κατάπλους ἢ Τύραννος, usually translated Journey The Tyrant other translations the Journey Hell or Journey Port), an all-purpose on religious persuasions, including the Greek, Roman, the Jewish, the Christian and so on.17 As historian, Hume knew Lucian of his aphoristic reflections on 'History.' In addition, Lucian is also the author the in Aληθῶν A True Story or True History, which is also the first science-fiction story and one of first tall tales or lying tales, – one Lucian's epithets is 'friend lies' corresponding to his claim where other authors when claim truth, he, by quite by telling the reader in advance that he is lying, is the only author who tells truth. Hume also have Lucian's for elegant and amusing order to recoup, as he tells his knowledge of Greek. Now the present editor Lucian's Kataplous only for the same reasons – is great fun to read in Greek – not less, in the context of Nietzsche scholarship, because  William Cullen to John Hunter, 1776, in James Fieser, Responses to Hume, and p. and in Baier, and Character, p. 103.  As Baier underscored again, in an communication with the editor, she likewise acknowledges in a footnote: began an e-conversation with Mazza, initiated by him" and p. 110.  Hume, Standard Taste," Lucian,Volumes Cf. Selected Satires of Lucian, see too the contributions to Ebner, Holger Gzella, Heinz-Günther Philopseudeis è Apiston. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige well as for a discussion of Lucian the topic of the
essentially sardonic ΚατάπλΟυς ἢ ΤύραννΟς, usuAllY trAnSlatEd ThE Downward JournEY or THe Tyrant (in other translaTions ThE TitlE Is Given As the JoURnEY To HElL oR JoUrNEy Into POrt), An all-puRpose assauLt oN rEligious persUAsIons, includIng The Greek, the ROmaN, the JeWiSh, tHE ChriStiAn and So on.17 As HIstoriAn, Hume kneW LUCian beCAuse of hIS ApHoriStic reflections on 'hIsTOry.' In addition, LUcian iS aLSo THE auThoR of the tongUe In cheEK, Aληθῶν δΙηΓΗΜΆτωΝ, a True Story or TRue History, wHIch Is also ThE fiRSt scieNce-fiCtIOn sTory and one oF the First tall Tales oR Lying taLEs, – one of lucian'S epIthEts iS 'FrIeNd oF lIEs' cORrEspONdiNg to his cLaIm That wHere ALL OTher AutHors Lie whEn they claim thE trUth, hE, By cOntraSt, quiTe by TeLling The reaDer in AdVance that he is lyIng, iS the only aUthOr Who TeLls thE Truth. HUme WouLd likelY also haVE reAd lUCIaN's dialogues for theiR eLEGaNt and amuSing GrEEk In ORder to reCoUp, aS he tELLs us hE recOUpS18 his knowLedge oF grEeK. Now the PrEsent eDiTor KnoWs LucIAn's KAtaploUs not onlY for tHE same reasons – it IS great fun to reAD iN gReEK – but Not Less, in the coNtexT Of NiEtzsCHe SchOLarshIp, becAuSE  WILliam Cullen to John HuNtEr, 17 SeptEmber 1776, In James Fieser, early RespoNSES to Hume, LIfe, aND REPutations, p. 292 and cIted iN Baier, DeatH And CharaCter, p. 103.  as Baier uNderscoreD AGain, in an EmaIl cOmmUniCATiOn with the editOR, She lIkEwise acKnoWledges In a FooTnoTe: "THiS essay begAn as an e-cOnVeRsAtIon With EMIlio MazzA, iNitIaTed By him" dEath anD CharActeR, p. 110.  huME, "Of The StanDArD OF TasTe," P. 208.  LUciaN,VoLuMes 1–8. Cf. luciAN, SeLected SAtires of LUciAN, and SeE tOo the coNtributions to maRtin Ebner, HOlGer gzella, hEInz-GünthEr Nesselrath, and Ernst RibBAt (Eds.), PhIloPseudEis è apiston. DiE LüGenfreUndE Oder: DeR UngläUbige As WelL AS for a DIScUssIoN of Lucian aLTHouGh the ToPic oF the
essentially sardonic Κατάπ λους ἢ Τύρ αννος , u sua ll y tr ansl ated The Downw a rd J ourney or The Tyrant ( in ot he r  tra n sl ation s the t i tl e isgi ve n a st he  Jour ney  to Hel l or Journ eyin to Port), an al l-purposeass ault on reli gio us per su asi o ns, i ncl uding  the G r eek, t he Roman,  t h e Jewi s h, theC h ri stia n and so on.17 As hi s torian, Hume k new Lu ci a nb e cau seof his aph or istic reflect i on s o n ' H istory.' In a ddition, Lu c ian  is al so  th e  autho r ofth e  to ngue in che ek,Aληθῶν Δι ηγημάτ ω ν, A Tr u e Story  or Tr ueHis tory ,  w hi chis als o  t hef irs t scienc e- fi ction  sto r y a nd o neof t he fi rst tall tale s o r ly i ngtales , – o ne o fLucia n's ep ithet sis 'friend of l ies'  correspo ndi ng  to  h is cl a im tha t w her e all o ther au t hor sl i e  w hen they claim the  t r u th , he, by  contr a st ,q uite byte lli ng t h e  read er i n  a dvance t hat he is  l ying, i sthe on ly  au tho r who tell s thetruth. H ume w o uld likely als o  have read Lu c ia n ' sd ialo gue s for their  ele g antanda mu sin g  Gree k inor d er to recoup, as he te ll s us h e rec oups18 his kn owledge of G r eek. Now  the pr e sent editor kn ows L ucian's Ka t aplous n ot on ly for t he same r e a sons – i t i s g rea t f u n  t o read in Gre e k  – b ut  not le ss,  in the  co nte xtofNi etzsche s cholarsh ip ,be ca use   W i lliam Cu ll ento  Jo hn Hu n ter, 1 7 Sep temb er  1 7 76,  in Jam e sF i eser ,Ea rlyRes po nsesto H u me,  Life,and Reput ati o ns,p.  2 92 andcited in Baie r,  Death and  C har acter, p . 103.   As Baier underscoreda gain, i n a n ema il c ommunicat ion  withthe editor , shelikew is e a c k nowle d g es  in  a  footnote: " Thi s ess ay  beg an as a n e-conversation w i thEmilio Mazza,  in itia t e dbyh im "  De at h  an d Character, p. 1 10.  Hum e, "O f the Stan d ard  o f Taste ," p. 2 08.    Lucian ,Volumes1–8. Cf.Lu cian , Sel ected Sati res of L ucian, an d  seet oo  thecon tribut io nsto Ma rtin E b ner , Hol ger Gz el la, He inz-G ün ther Nes selrath, and Ernst Ribb at (Ed s.),Phi lopseudei s è Api ston. Die  Lüg enfreundeode r:Der U ngl ä ubige  asw el l a s  fora di s cussion o f  L uci a n  a lthough the t o pic  of t he
essentially sardonic_Κατάπλους ἢ_Τύραννος, usually translated The_Downward Journey_or_The Tyrant_(in_other translations the_title is given_as the Journey to_Hell or Journey_into_Port), an all-purpose assault on religious persuasions, including the Greek, the Roman, the Jewish,_the_Christian and_so_on.17_As historian, Hume knew Lucian_because of his aphoristic reflections_on 'History.'_In addition, Lucian is also the author of_the_tongue in cheek,_Aληθῶν Διηγημάτων, A True Story or True History, which_is also the first science-fiction story_and one of_the_first_tall tales or lying_tales, – one of Lucian's epithets_is 'friend of lies' corresponding to_his claim that where all other authors_lie when they claim the truth,_he, by contrast, quite by_telling the_reader in advance that he_is lying, is_the only_author who tells_the truth. Hume would likely also_have read Lucian's_dialogues for their elegant and amusing_Greek_in order to_recoup,_as_he tells_us he recoups18_his_knowledge of_Greek._Now the present editor knows Lucian's_Kataplous_not only for the same reasons –_it is great fun_to_read in Greek –_but not less, in the_context of Nietzsche scholarship, because _William Cullen_to John_Hunter, 17 September 1776, in James Fieser, Early Responses to Hume,_Life, and Reputations, p. 292 and_cited in Baier, Death_and Character,_p._103.  As_Baier_underscored again,_in an email communication with the editor,_she likewise_acknowledges in a footnote: "This essay_began as an e-conversation_with_Emilio Mazza, initiated by him" Death_and Character, p. 110.  Hume,_"Of the Standard of Taste,"_p._208._ Lucian,Volumes 1–8. Cf. Lucian,_Selected Satires of Lucian, and see_too the contributions_to Martin Ebner, Holger Gzella, Heinz-Günther Nesselrath,_and_Ernst Ribbat (Eds.), Philopseudeis è Apiston._Die_Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige as well_as_for_a discussion of Lucian although_the topic of the