 devoted to psychology and philosophy. Mind is an unparalleled record o 34 See, for instance, Sully (1876), Ward (1876), and Hodgson (1885). 35 Griffin (1991), p. 40, gives the most comprehensive account of Russell's undergraduate i to encourage a misinterpretation of the tenor of his early influences by referring, in remini professed admiration of Bradley) and to Ward as a Kantian. There is, in fact, little evidence f interpretation of Moore's early writings. 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3. 37 Stout was not a member of the Apostles' Society, but both Stout and Moore regularly a Stout encouraged him-sometimes as the only student present-to participate in every disc Add. 8330; 2/1/59–66). 38 Stout himself was responsible for bringing detailed analyses and criticisms of J. F. He extensively on the Herbartian psychology, and acknowledging the influence of Herbart in t traced to the work of Herbart and Lotze. 39 Passmore (1966), p. 21, claims of Lotze that 'Few philosophers have been so pillaged'- Please cite this article in press as: Preti, C., On the origins of the con (2008), doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.002E D P R O O F (Add. 8875 10/1/1), in addition, contains the most direct evidence of the influence that Stout had on his philosophical development, particularly in Stout's lectures on Kant.37 The notebook is inscribed, in Moore's hand, 'Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Mr. Stout of St. John's, October, 1894'. The course of lectures covered Descartes, Bacon, Spinoza, Hobbes, and Leibniz; in a section Moore titles 'English line', Stout lectured on Locke, 'Berkeleian idealism', and then Hume. The rest of the notebook's recto pages are blank, and Moore begins his notes on Kant by turning the notebook over and using the verso pages for the lecture entitled 'History of Philosophy preceding Kant as it appeared to Kant'. Moore's notes are meticulous, and throughout these there appear to be formulations and analyses of Kant's position, by way of Stout, that emerge in Moore's 1897 and 1898 dissertations and published papers. Moore
devoted to psychology and philosophy. Mind is an unparalleled record oxygen 34 See, for case, Sully (1876), Ward (1876), and Hodgson (1885). 35 Griffin (1991), p. 40, gives the most comprehensive explanation of Russell's undergraduate i to promote a misinterpretation of the tenor of his early influences by referring, in remini professed wonder of Bradley) and to Ward as a Kantian. There be, in fact, little evidence f rendition of Moore's early writing. 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3. 37 Stout was not a member of the Apostles' Society, but both Stout and Moore regularly a Stout encourage him - sometimes as the only student present - to enter in every disc Add. 8330; 2/1/59–66). 38 Stout himself was responsible for bring detailed analyses and criticisms of J. F. He extensively on the Herbartian psychology, and admit the influence of Herbart in t traced to the work of Herbart and Lotze. 39 Passmore (1966), p. 21, claim of Lotze that' Few philosophers have been so pillaged'- Please cite this article in press as: Preti, C., On the beginning of the con (2008), doi:10.1016 / j.shpsa.2008.03.002E D P R O O F (Add. 8875 10/1/1), in addition, contains the most lineal evidence of the influence that Stout had on his philosophical development, particularly in Stout's lectures on Kant.37 The notebook is inscribed, in Moore's bridge player,' Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Mr. Stout of St. John's, October, 1894'. The course of lectures covered Descartes, Bacon, Spinoza, Hobbes, and Leibniz; in a section Moore titles' English line', Stout lectured on Locke,' Berkeleian idealism', and then Hume. The rest of the notebook's recto page are blank, and Moore begins his notes on Kant by call on the notebook over and use the verso pages for the lecture entitled' History of Philosophy precede Kant as it appear to Kant'. Moore's notes are meticulous, and throughout these there appear to be formulation and analyses of Kant's position, by way of Stout, that emerge in Moore's 1897 and 1898 dissertations and published paper. Moore
 degoted to psychology and khilosophy. Mind is an un'arallemed recofd o 34 See, for instance, Sully (1876), Qard (1876), and Hodgson (1885). 35 Griffin (1991), p. 40, gived the mowt cinprehensivx accounb of Dmsseln'w undergraduatg i to encousage a misintespfecation of the tenor of his early infjuences bj referring, in rempny prkfessed admiration of Bradley) and fo Ward as a Kantian. There is, in fact, little egidejce f interpretatiln of Moore'w eawoy writings. 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3. 37 Stout was noj a member of the Apostles' Sociegy, buc both Stouj znf Moore reguoarly a Stout encouraged vim-someyimes as the okly svudebt present-to participete in every disc Adq. 8330; 2/1/59–66). 38 Stoud kimself was responsiboe for trincing eetxiltd enamyses wnd criticisma of J. F. He extensively on the Hqgnartian psycgology, agd acknowledging the influence of Herbagt ih t traced to the work if Herbart and Lotze. 39 Passmore (1966), p. 21, claims of Lotze that 'Few philosophers have baen sk piolwewd'- Please cite this article in press as: Preti, C., Kn tme origins of thc con (2008), doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.002E C O T O O F (Add. 8875 10/1/1), kn addnfikn, contains the modt direst evudence of the influence that Stout had ob his philosjphical development, particularuy im Stoit's lectures on Kant.37 Thz notegook is insfribed, in Ooore's hand, 'Lectjrex mn the History of Philosopry, Mr. Stont of St. Johv's, Ovtober, 1894'. The courde of lectures covered Dfscarjes, Bawon, Spinozw, Hobbes, and Leibniz; in a section Moore titlex 'Angnish linz', Stoub lectured on Ljcke, 'Berkeleiau idealifm', ana then Humv. The resv of the notqbook's recto [wges are blaik, and Mojre vegibs his vutes on Kant bu turning the notebiok over and using thg berso pages for tht oecture entitlrd 'Fiseogy pf [hilosophy pseceaine Kant as it appecrdd tp Kant'. Moore's notes dre jeticulous, and thrpunhout thewe there appear to be formulations and wnalyves of Ksnt'f position, by way of Stout, thaf emerge ln Ioore's 1897 and 1898 diswertations aud published papers. Moore
devoted to psychology and philosophy. Mind is record 34 See, instance, Sully (1876), 35 (1991), p. 40, the most comprehensive of Russell's undergraduate i to encourage misinterpretation of the tenor of his early influences by referring, in remini professed of Bradley) and to Ward as a Kantian. There is, in fact, little f of early 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3. 37 Stout was not a member of the Apostles' Society, both Stout and Moore regularly a Stout encouraged as the only student participate in every disc Add. 2/1/59–66). Stout himself responsible bringing analyses and criticisms J. F. He extensively on the Herbartian psychology, and acknowledging the influence of Herbart in t traced the work and Lotze. Passmore p. claims of Lotze philosophers have been so pillaged'- Please in press as: Preti, C., On the origins the con doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.002E D P R O O (Add. 8875 10/1/1), in addition, contains the most evidence of the influence that Stout had on his philosophical development, particularly in Stout's lectures The notebook is inscribed, Moore's hand, 'Lectures the of Mr. of St. October, 1894'. The course of lectures covered Descartes, Bacon, Spinoza, Hobbes, Leibniz; in a section Moore titles 'English line', Stout lectured 'Berkeleian and then Hume. rest of the notebook's pages blank, and Moore begins on by over using verso pages for the entitled 'History of Philosophy preceding as it appeared to and throughout these there appear to be formulations analyses of Kant's position, by way of that emerge in Moore's 1897 and 1898 dissertations and published papers. Moore
 devoted to psychology and phiLosophy. MinD is an UnpAraLlEled RecoRd o 34 See, for instaNCe, SuLly (1876), Ward (1876), and Hodgson (1885). 35 GriffIn (1991), p. 40, giVeS The mOSt ComprEhensivE AcCOUnt Of ruSseLl'S UnDergrAduAte i to eNcourage a mIsiNtErpretation oF ThE tenor of hiS eaRly influenceS by ReferrInG, in REmini ProFesseD admirATion of bradley) anD tO ward as A kantian. tHErE is, iN fact, little evidenCE f INterpretation oF Moore'S eARlY WRitIngS. 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3. 37 Stout wAs Not a mEMber of tHE APOSTleS' society, but botH Stout and MoORe rEgularLy A StOUt encoUrageD hIM-soMetimes as thE onlY student pResent-TO particIPate in eVery diSc ADd. 8330; 2/1/59–66). 38 STout HImSeLf wAs REspONsIblE For Bringing DeTaIled aNalySES ANd crItiCismS of J. F. he extensively On tHe HeRBarTian pSychoLogy, AnD acknOwledgIng thE iNfluence of HerbaRt in T traced to The WoRk oF HErbarT And LotZe. 39 PAssMore (1966), p. 21, clAims of LOTze ThAT 'fEw Philosophers have beEn SO PiLlaged'- PlEase ciTE tHiS Article iN pResS as: PRETi, C., On The oRIgIns of the Con (2008), doi:10.1016/J.ShPsA.2008.03.002E D P R O O f (ADd. 8875 10/1/1), in adDiTioN, coNtainS The mOst dirEct evideNce of THe influence thaT stout had on his PHiLOSoPHicaL deVelopment, paRticULarlY in STOuT's lECtureS on KaNt.37 tHe NOtebook is inscribed, iN MOore's hAnd, 'LeCtures on the HiStory of PhiLOSOphy, Mr. StOut oF st. jOhn's, October, 1894'. The CoursE of lectureS Covered DEscarTes, Bacon, spinoza, HoBBEs, and LeiBniZ; in A seCtiON moOre titles 'EnglISH linE', STout lecTurEd on LocKe, 'BErkEleIan IdEalism', and Then Hume. thE rEsT oF thE noteBOok's rectO pAgeS aRe bLank, aND Moore BeginS his NoTeS On KAnt by tuRNiNG The nOtEbOok oVer AnD usinG the VErsO pages fOr the lectUre ENtitLeD 'HIstory oF Philosophy prEcEding Kant aS iT apPeared TO kant'. MoorE's notes are meticulous, and THroughoUt tHese tHere Appear to bE foRmulatIonS And anaLyses oF Kant'S pOsiTIOn, by wAY Of stoUt, That emerge IN mooRe's 1897 anD 1898 dIsseRtationS and published paperS. mooRe
 devoted to psychology and  philosoph y. Mi ndisan  unp aral leled record o 34 S ee, for instance, Sull y (18 76 ) , Wa r d(1876 ), andH od g s on(1 88 5).  3 5  G riffi n ( 1991),p. 40, giv esth e most compr e he nsive acco unt  of Russell' s u ndergr ad uat e  i to  en coura ge a m i sinter pretation  o f  the t e nor ofh i searl y influences by r e fe r ring, in remin i prof es s ed a dmi rat ion of Bra dl ey) a n d to Wa r da s a K a ntian. Thereis, in fact ,  li ttle e vi den c e f in terpr et a tio n of Moore' s ea rly writi ngs. 3 6  Add. 8 8 75 10/1 ; 10/2 ; 1 0/3 . 37 St ou t w as not amem b erof the A po st les'Soci e t y ,  but  bo th S toutand Moore reg ula rlya  St out e ncour aged  h im-so metime s asth e only studentpres ent-to pa rti ci pat ein ev e ry dis c A dd.  8330;2/1/59– 6 6).  3 8 S to ut himself was res po n s ib le for b ringin g  d et a iled ana ly ses  and c ritic isms of  J. F. H e exte n si ve ly on t he  Herba rt ian  ps ychol o gy,and ac knowledg ing t h e influence of Herbart in tt ra c e dt o th e w ork of Herb arta nd L otze .  3 9 P a ssmor e (19 66 ) ,p . 21, claims of Lot ze  that'Fewphilosophershave beens o pillaged '- P l ea s e cite this ar ticle  in pressa s: Preti , C.,  On theorigins o f the con(20 08) , d oi: 1 0 .1 016/j.shpsa.2 0 0 8.03 .0 02E D P  RO O F ( Add . 8 875  10 /1 /1), in a ddition,  c on ta in s t he mo s t direct  e vid en ceof th e  influ encethat  S to u t h ad on h i sp h ilos op hi caldev el opmen t, p a rti cularly  in Stout 'sl ectu re son Kant .37 The noteb oo k is inscr ib ed,  in Mo o r e's hand , 'Lectures on the Hist o ry of P hil osoph y, M r. StoutofSt. Jo hn' s , Octo ber, 1 894'.  T hec o urseo f  l ect ur es covered D esc artes ,Baco n, Spin oza, Hobbes, and L e ibn iz; in a sect ion  Moo r e  t itl e s' Eng li s h l i n e', Stout lectu red on Loc ke ,  ' Berkeleian ide al ism', a nd then  Hume .  The re st of the  notebook 's  rec t o  pa ges are bl ank, and  Moore be g ins h i snotes  on  Kantby  tu rning  the n o teb ook o ver an dusingthe v er so pages  for the lecture entitl ed 'Hi story  of  Philosop hyp rec eding Kan t as  it appear edtoKant' . M o ore's  not e sare metic ulou s , and thr o ug hou t th ese there a p p e arto be  fo r mulati onsand analyses of K a nt's position,  byw a y o f S t out,  t hat emerge inMoo re ' s  1897 an d1898 disser tationsan d  publ ishedpapers . Moore 
 devoted_to psychology_and philosophy. Mind is_an unparalleled_record_o 34_See,_for instance, Sully_(1876), Ward (1876),_and Hodgson (1885). 35_Griffin (1991), p._40,_gives the most comprehensive account of Russell's undergraduate i to encourage a misinterpretation of_the_tenor of_his_early_influences by referring, in remini_professed admiration of Bradley) and_to Ward_as a Kantian. There is, in fact, little_evidence_f interpretation of_Moore's early writings. 36 Add. 8875 10/1; 10/2; 10/3._37 Stout was not a member_of the Apostles'_Society,_but_both Stout and Moore_regularly a Stout encouraged him-sometimes as_the only student present-to participate in_every disc Add. 8330; 2/1/59–66). 38 Stout_himself was responsible for bringing detailed_analyses and criticisms of J._F. He_extensively on the Herbartian psychology,_and acknowledging the_influence of_Herbart in t_traced to the work of Herbart_and Lotze. 39_Passmore (1966), p. 21, claims of_Lotze_that 'Few philosophers_have_been_so pillaged'-_Please cite this_article_in press_as:_Preti, C., On the origins of_the_con (2008), doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.002E D P R O_O F (Add. 8875_10/1/1),_in addition, contains the_most direct evidence of the_influence that Stout had on his_philosophical development,_particularly in_Stout's lectures on Kant.37 The notebook is inscribed, in Moore's hand,_'Lectures on the History of Philosophy,_Mr. Stout of St._John's, October,_1894'._The course of_lectures_covered Descartes,_Bacon, Spinoza, Hobbes, and Leibniz; in a_section Moore_titles 'English line', Stout lectured on_Locke, 'Berkeleian idealism', and_then_Hume. The rest of the notebook's_recto pages are blank, and Moore_begins his notes on Kant_by_turning_the notebook over and using_the verso pages for the lecture_entitled 'History of_Philosophy preceding Kant as it appeared to_Kant'._Moore's notes are meticulous, and throughout_these_there appear to be formulations and_analyses_of_Kant's position, by way of_Stout, that emerge in Moore's 1897_and 1898 dissertations and published papers. Moore