 molders fodder was molded and by sand 37 MONOLINGUALS 82.4% Phonetic errors were made (boulders,bodded,sound, Folding, holders, soldiers,), New words made from phonetics (like, in, in sight), there were also words created contextually from the phonetics (sand boxes, sam's mind) MULTILINGUALS 91.6% More Phonetic errors were made ( boulders, mouldered, folds, modered, boders, sant, molders,.. etc.), More new words were made from phonetics (sample, tight, father, cider, sam's, found, flooding, santsludder, thodor, holes, stormers). Repetition of words was found (sand). There is also evidence of new semantic meaning being created ( thought there was a molded folded in the sand folds, father was found the folders, father was molded and holded inside folders, was moulded and folded into sand, father was molded and folded in cider) thodder was modded and folded in sand solders fodder was modded and moulded inside sand bites fonder was molds inside sam's mind thdder was molded and fodded inside sand folders thought there was a molded folded in the sand folds father was molded and folded in cider fodder was molded and folded inside sam's folders fodler was moulded and folded inside fodder was moded and in fother was found the folders father is molded in foth scot flooding in wet sket fodder was moulded and boulded in santsuldder folders thodor was folded and molded in red sands and sand holes fodder was modled inside sand stormers father was molded and holded inside folders was moulded and folded into sand 38 Discussion This paper aims to systematically combine different levels of cognitive load, linguistic load and contextual meaning in sentences as a framework to predict how well perceived sentences will be in monolinguals and multilinguals and what the perceptual differences are between them in noise. From the sentence clusters formed in monolinguals and multilinguals, the sentence categories in the theoretical framework played almost no role in which cluster sentences were placed in. As a consequence, one cannot predict how well perceived a sentence will be, or how well perceived one sentence will be from another, by classifying them into different level combinations of linguistic load, cognitive load and contextual meaning
molders fodder was molded and by sand 37 MONOLINGUALS 82.4% Phonetic error were do (boulders, bodded, sound, Folding, holders, soldier ,), New words have from phonetics (like, in, in sight), there were besides son created contextually from the phonetics (backbone boxes, sam's mind) MULTILINGUALS 91.6% More Phonetic errors were made (boulder, mouldered, folds, modered, boders, sant, molders, .. etc .), More new words were made from phonetics (sample distribution, tight, father, cider, sam's, found, implosion therapy, santsludder, thodor, holes, stormers). Repetition of words was found (sand). There be also evidence of new semantic meaning being created (thought there was a molded fold in the sand folds, father was found the folders, father was molded and hold inside folders, was moulded and folded into sand, father was molded and folded in cider) thodder was modded and folded in sand solders fodder was modded and model inside sand bites fonder was mold inside sam's judgment thdder was molded and fodded inside sand folders intend there was a molded folded in the sand folds founder was molded and folded in cider fodder was molded and folded inside sam's folders fodler was cast and folded inside fodder was moded and in fother was found the folders founder is molded in foth scot implosion therapy in besotted sket cannon fodder was moulded and boulded in santsuldder folders thodor was folded and molded in red sands and sand holes cannon fodder was modled inside sand stormers father was mold and holded inside folders was cast and folded into sand 38 Discussion This composition aims to systematically unite different level of cognitive load, linguistic warhead and contextual meaning in sentences as a framework to predict how well perceived sentences will be in monolingual and multilinguals and what the perceptual differences are between them in noise. From the sentence bunch formed in monolinguals and multilinguals, the sentence categories in the theoretical model played almost no role in which cluster sentence were placed in. As a consequence, one cannot predict how well perceived a sentence will be, or how well perceived one sentence will be from another, by relegate them into different level combinations of linguistic load, cognitive load and contextual meaning
 mopders fodder was molded xnd by sand 37 MOUILINGUELS 82.4% Phknetic efrors were made (boulders,boddxd,soynd, Filding, holders, soldierr,), New worfs made drom phonetics (like, in, lu siggb), thexe were also worcs created contextually xrum the phonetics (sand boxes, sam's mind) MULTILONHUALS 91.6% More Phjnetpc errkgs were made ( boulders, moulderes, folds, modered, bodets, sant, molders,.. etc.), More nfw wlrds were made frol phonetics (sam[oe, tight, fatfer, cider, sam's, found, fmooding, santsludder, thodor, holer, stoxmers). Repetutuon mf words waw fougd (sand). Therc is alvo evidrnce of new sekanvic neaning being created ( thought there waf a moldeg yolded in the sand foodw, fatver fas wiuna tge fklders, favher was momded and hooded inside folders, www moulded and foldeq ynto sand, father was molded and folded pn cjder) thodder was modded and folded in sand sllders foqder was modded and moulded inside sand bites fonger wes moodf undide sam's mind thdder was molded and fodded igaice sand folders bhought there was s lokqed folded in the schd folds father was lolded wnd filded in sidet fodder was molded and foleed inside scm's folders fodler wad moulded aud folced imside fodder was moded cnd in fother was found ths folders father ks konded in foth scot flooding in wet sjet yodder wxs mpulded and bouldfd in santsuldder folderd thobor wds folded wnd molded in red sands and sanv holes foddet wds kodled iuside xand stormers father was mokded anb holddd inside rolders was mouldeq and folded hjto sand 38 Divcussion Thiw paper aimr to systematicslly combpnt differenr levels of cognitlve luzd, linguistic liad and contextual mexnigg ii seneances as a fsamedory to pfedict how ceul prrceived sentences whll ge in monolinguals akd multilunguals wnd what the lerceptual differejces ere bevween yhei in noise. From the sentence cmusters flrmcd in monolindualw and multilnnguals, the sentence categories in the tieoretical framework plqyed almost no role ln which cluxter fentences were placed in. As a consequence, one gannot predict how welm percaived a sentence will be, or how well perceived one sentence will be from anothwr, by rlwssifying tgem onto giyfexent ledel roobinations of limguistic load, cognitive load anv contextudl meaning
molders fodder was molded and by sand 82.4% errors were (boulders,bodded,sound, Folding, holders, phonetics in, in sight), were also words contextually from the phonetics (sand boxes, mind) MULTILINGUALS 91.6% More Phonetic errors were made ( boulders, mouldered, folds, modered, sant, molders,.. etc.), More new words were made from phonetics (sample, tight, father, sam's, flooding, thodor, stormers). Repetition of words was found (sand). There is also evidence of new semantic meaning being ( thought there was a molded folded in sand folds, father was the folders, father was molded holded folders, was and into father was molded folded in cider) thodder was modded and folded in sand solders fodder was modded and moulded inside bites fonder inside sam's thdder molded fodded inside sand there was a molded folded in father was molded and folded in cider fodder molded and inside sam's folders fodler was moulded folded inside fodder was moded and in fother found the folders father is molded in foth scot flooding in wet sket fodder was boulded in santsuldder folders was folded and in sands sand fodder was inside sand stormers father was molded and holded inside folders was and folded into sand 38 Discussion This paper aims to different of cognitive load, load and contextual meaning sentences a framework to predict perceived will and and the perceptual differences are them in noise. From the clusters formed in monolinguals in the theoretical framework played almost no role which cluster sentences were placed in. As consequence, one cannot predict how well perceived a sentence will be, or well perceived will be from another, by classifying them into level combinations of linguistic cognitive load and contextual meaning
 molders fodder was molded and By sand 37 MONOlINGUaLS 82.4% phoNeTic eRrorS were made (bouldERs,boDded,sound, Folding, holderS, soldIeRS,), New WOrDs madE from phONeTICs (lIkE, iN, in SiGHt), There WerE also woRds created ConTeXtually from tHE pHonetics (saNd bOxes, sam's mind) mULtILINGuAlS 91.6% MORe PhoNetIc errOrs werE Made ( boUlders, mouLdERed, folDS, modereD, BOdErs, sAnt, molders,.. etc.), More NEw WOrds were made frOm phonEtICs (SAMplE, tiGht, father, cIdEr, sam'S, Found, flOOdING, SanTSludder, thodor, Holes, stormeRS). RePetitiOn Of wORds was Found (SaND). ThEre is also evIdenCe of new seMantic MEaning bEIng creaTed ( thoUghT thEre wAS a MoLdeD fOLdeD In The SAnd Folds, fatHeR wAs fouNd thE FOLDers, FatHer wAs molDed and holded iNsiDe foLDerS, was mOuldeD and FoLded iNto sanD, fathEr Was molded and folDed iN cider) thoDdeR wAs mOdDed anD Folded In sAnd Solders Fodder wAS moDdED ANd Moulded inside sand bItES FoNder was mOlds inSIdE sAM's mind thDdEr wAs moLDEd and FoddED iNside sanD foldeRS tHoUght theRe Was a moLdEd fOldEd in tHE sanD folds Father waS moldED and folded in ciDEr fodder was moLDeD ANd FOldeD inSide sam's folDers FOdleR was MOuLdeD And foLded iNsIDe FOdder was moded and in fOtHer was Found The folders fatHer is moldeD IN Foth scot FlooDInG In wet sket foddeR was mOulded and bOUlded in sAntsuLdder folDers thodoR WAs folded And MolDed In rED SaNds and sand holES FoddEr Was modlEd iNside saNd sTorMerS faThEr was moldEd and holDeD iNsIdE foLders WAs mouldeD aNd fOlDed Into sANd 38 DiscUssioN ThiS pApER aiMs to sysTEmATIcalLy CoMbinE diFfErent LeveLS of CognitiVe load, linGuiSTic lOaD aNd conteXtual meaning iN sEntences as A fRamEwork tO PRedict hoW well perceived sentences WIll be in MonOlingUals And multilIngUals anD whAT the peRceptuAl difFeRenCES are bETWeEn tHeM in noise. FrOM The SenteNcE cluSters foRmed in monolinguals ANd mUltilinguals, tHe sEnteNCE cAteGOrIEs iN tHE thEORetical frameworK played almOsT No Role in whicH CluStEr senteNces werE placED in. As a cOnsequencE, one cannoT pRediCT How Well perceiVed a sentEnce will bE, Or how WElL percEivEd one sEnTenCe wilL be froM AnoTher, bY classIfYing thEm intO dIfferent Level combinations of lingUistic Load, cOgnItive load And COntExtual meaNing
 molders fodder was molded  and by sa nd 37  MO NOL IN GUAL S 82 .4% Phonetic e r rors  were made (boulders,b odded ,s o und, Fo lding , holde r s, s old ie rs ,),  N e wwords  ma de from  phonetics  (l ik e, in, in si g ht ), there w ere  also wordscre ated c on tex t ually  fr om th e phon e tics ( sand boxe s, sam'sm ind) MU L T IL INGU ALS 91.6% More Ph o ne t ic errors were  made(b ou l d ers , m ouldered,fo lds,m odered, bo d e r s,s ant, molders, .. etc.), M o renew wo rd s w e re mad e fro mp hon etics (samp le,tight, fa ther,c ider, s a m's, fo und, f loo din g, s a nt sl udd er ,  th o do r,h ole s, storm er s) . Rep etit i o n of w ord s wa s fou nd (sand). Th ere  isa lso  evid enceof n ew  sema ntic m eanin gbeing created (  tho ught ther e w as  amo ldedf oldedinthe  sand f olds, f a the rw a s  f ound the folders,fa t h er  was mol ded an d  h ol d ed insid efol ders , was m ould e dand fold ed int o  s an d, fath er  was m ol ded  an d fol d ed i n cide r) thodd er wa s  modded and fo l ded in sand s o ld e r sf odde r w as modded a nd m o ulde d in s id e s a nd bi tes f on d er was molds inside sa m' s mind  thdd er was molded  and fodde d i nside sa nd f o ld e rs thought the re wa s a molded folded i n the  sand fo lds fathe r was mold edand  fo lde d in  cider fodder w as m ol ded and  fo lded in sid e s am' s f ol ders fodl er was m ou ld ed  a ndfolde d  insidefo dde rwas  mode d  and i n fot herwa sf oun d the f o ld e r s fa th er  ismol de d infoth sco t flood ing in we t s k et f od de r was m oulded and bo ul ded in san ts uld der fo l d ers thod or was folded and molde d  in red  sa nds a nd s and holes  fo dder w asm odledinside  sand  s tor m e rs fa t h er  wa smolded and h old ed in si de f olderswas moulded and fo l ded  into sand 38  Di scus s i on  Th i sp ape ra ims t o systematicall y combinedi f fe rent level s  of  c ognitiv e load,  ling u istic l oad and c ontextual  m eani n g  in  sentences  as a fr amework t o  pred i ct  howwel l perc ei ved  sent encesw ill  be i n mono li nguals  andmu ltilingu als and what the percep tual d iffer enc es are be twe e n t hem in no ise.  From thesen ten ce cl ust e rs fo rmed in  mo n oling uals and multi l in gua l s ,the sentenc e c ate gorie s i n  the t heor etical frameworkp layed almost n o ro l e  in  wh i ch c lu ster sentences  we re p laced in .As a conseq uence, o ne canno t pred ict ho w wellp e rc e ived a  sen ten ce will b e,or how wel lpe r ceived  one  s entenc e will be f r o m another, by cl assif y i ng th e m i nto d if ferentl evel  combinati ons of ling uistic  loa d, co gnitive  l oad an d c on textual me a ning
 molders_fodder was_molded and by sand_37 MONOLINGUALS_82.4%_Phonetic errors_were_made (boulders,bodded,sound, Folding,_holders, soldiers,), New_words made from phonetics_(like, in, in_sight),_there were also words created contextually from the phonetics (sand boxes, sam's mind) MULTILINGUALS_91.6%_More Phonetic_errors_were_made ( boulders, mouldered, folds,_modered, boders, sant, molders,.. etc.),_More new_words were made from phonetics (sample, tight, father,_cider,_sam's, found, flooding,_santsludder, thodor, holes, stormers). Repetition of words was found_(sand). There is also evidence of_new semantic meaning_being_created_( thought there was_a molded folded in the sand_folds, father was found the folders,_father was molded and holded inside folders,_was moulded and folded into sand,_father was molded and folded_in cider)_thodder was modded and folded_in sand solders_fodder was_modded and moulded_inside sand bites fonder was molds_inside sam's mind_thdder was molded and fodded inside_sand_folders thought there_was_a_molded folded_in the sand_folds_father was_molded_and folded in cider fodder was_molded_and folded inside sam's folders fodler was_moulded and folded inside_fodder_was moded and in_fother was found the folders_father is molded in foth scot_flooding in_wet sket_fodder was moulded and boulded in santsuldder folders thodor was folded_and molded in red sands and_sand holes fodder was_modled inside_sand_stormers father was_molded_and holded_inside folders was moulded and folded into_sand 38_Discussion This paper aims to systematically_combine different levels of_cognitive_load, linguistic load and contextual meaning_in sentences as a framework to_predict how well perceived sentences_will_be_in monolinguals and multilinguals and_what the perceptual differences are between_them in noise._From the sentence clusters formed in monolinguals_and_multilinguals, the sentence categories in the_theoretical_framework played almost no role in_which_cluster_sentences were placed in. As_a consequence, one cannot predict how_well perceived a sentence will be, or how well_perceived one sentence_will be from another, by_classifying_them_into different level combinations of linguistic load, cognitive load and_contextual meaning