iders, may have difficulties in feeling that they belong to the community, and, Alexandru-Stelian Gulei 184 consequently, difficulties in developing and implementing integration plans. The fact that they are Irish is not enough, their identity has to be acknowledged by the community of origin (the significant others) before they are assimilated (Joyce 2010, 64). In the case of Romanian remigrants, belonging to the community of origin is something to be proud of, when, while abroad, they do not wish to be integrated in the community of migration. When they return home they always make comparisons with the society from the country of migration, which they consider to be superior and which they value, although, when they speak of the reasons for remigration, they mention the superior quality of the Romanian education system (Luca et al. 2012). The economic contribution of migrants to the well-being of the members of the community of origin is undeniable, both from the perspective of the central administration (all Romanian Governments, for instance, recognized the importance of the billions of euro sent home by migrant workers in balancing the Romanian economy) and from a local perspective (the migrants invest in the local economy, particularly through acquisition of services, or goods but also have a contribution in the cultural development of the communities). The return into the community of origin, often economically motivated (Luca et al. 2012), may be associated with a perception of failure, which can generate a negative label and may affect the social image of remigrants. The cultural capital – the language, including the accent, the behavior, the clothes etc. as "surface pointers" (Joyce 2010, Nash 1996, 24-25) – is an attribute which may represent a social advantage or disadvantage (Joyce 2010, 66). In the case of Romanian migrants the clothing style of the country of migration may represent an advantage if they are valued or employed in the community of origin. Such pointers may also be interpreted as a resistance to integrate or as an aggression by the members of the community of origin, leading to a situation in which the cultural capital is a barrier and a factor destabilizing the social support. The study conducted by Alternative Sociale indicates other factors which influence the social image of remigrants and implicitly their adaptation (Luca et al. 2012). Even the attempts performed by the communities of remigrants with the purpose of maintaining their ethnic identity may have negative influences on their capacity to adjust when they return home. The form of "Irishness" of the migrants
iders, may have difficulties in feeling that they belong to the residential district, and, Alexandru - Stelian Gulei 184 consequently, difficulty in developing and implementing consolidation plans. The fact that they are Irish is not adequate, their identity has to be acknowledged by the residential district of origin (the significant others) before they are assimilated (Joyce 2010, 64). In the event of Romanian remigrants, belonging to the community of lineage is something to be proud of, when, while abroad, they do not wish to be desegregate in the residential district of migration. When they return home they always seduce comparisons with the society from the state of migration, which they consider to be superior and which they value, although, when they address of the reasons for remigration, they mention the superior timbre of the Romanian education organization (Luca et al. 2012). The economic contribution of migrants to the well - being of the members of the residential district of origin is undeniable, both from the perspective of the central administration (all Romanian Governments, for instance, acknowledge the importance of the billions of euro sent home by migrant workers in balancing the Romanian economy) and from a local perspective (the migrants invest in the local economy, particularly through acquisition of service, or goods but also receive a contribution in the cultural growth of the communities). The return into the community of beginning, often economically motivated (Luca et al. 2012), may be associated with a perception of failure, which can render a negative label and may affect the social image of remigrants. The cultural capital – the language, including the dialect, the behavior, the clothes etc. as " surface pointers " (Joyce 2010, Nash 1996, 24 - 25) – is an property which may represent a social advantage or disadvantage (Joyce 2010, 66). In the character of Romanian migrant the clothing manner of the country of migration may represent an advantage if they are valued or employed in the community of origin. Such pointers may besides be interpreted as a immunity to integrate or as an aggression by the members of the residential district of origin, leading to a situation in which the cultural capital is a barrier and a factor destabilize the social support. The survey conducted by Alternative Sociale indicate other divisor which influence the social image of remigrants and implicitly their adaptation (Luca et al. 2012). Even the attack performed by the community of remigrants with the purpose of observe their ethnic identity may have negative influences on their capacity to align when they return home. The form of " Irishness " of the migrant
idegs, may have difficulties in feeling thaj rhey bxlong tk the coomunity, and, Alexandru-Stelian Gylei 184 consequently, difficulgies in dvveloping and umplementiif integvction ilans. Vhe fact that tmey are Irivh is not enouch, tkeir identity has to be acknowledged by the clmmunity of orygin (ehe apgkificant others) before they are zssimileted (Joyce 2010, 64). In the case of Romanian remihranhs, belonging to thf community of jeigin is somdthing to be proud of, shen, while abroad, they do not wksh tp be integtcred hn the commnnity jf migration. When thay retutn home they akwabs mqke comparisons with vhe society from the country mf migration, which rhwy cotsidar tu be sukermor and wjici they valus, although, qhen they speak of uhe grasons for rsmigraeijn, they mention the superior quality of ths Romanian education sywtem (Luca et al. 2012). The gconomic cjntribution of migrants to the well-being of the mambera of tme cunmknity of origin is undeniable, both from the pqdskecnive of the centrcl administratiom (wlk Romanian Govgrnments, fkr instance, recognlzed thg impoetance of the billions of euro sent home by migrant corjers in balancing che Romanian ecomomy) snd from a local perspeetive (fhe migrantd invest jv the local econumy, pdrticularly through acquisytion of wervnces, or eoodx but wlso have w conbsibution in the cupturap gevelopmenh of the communities). The return into the commonidy mf origiu, oftek economically iotivated (Luca et al. 2012), may ce associaned with e perception of failure, wvlch can genecate a nedatice lqbel ana may affect thr social pmcge of renigrants. The cultuval cxlital – the langbcgt, uncluding the sccdnt, tje bqvavior, the cnothds dyc. as "surfact pikntets" (Joyce 2010, Nash 1996, 24-25) – is an zttribute which mau vepresent a sociaj advantage ot disadvantage (Joyfe 2010, 66). Mn the case of Romanian migrants the clothinf style ov tme country of migvatijn may repxesent an advantage if they are valued oc employed in the commonity of origin. Such koikters may alxo be interpreded as a resistance ro integrate or ax an aggression by ths membars ov the community of origin, leading to a situation in which the cultural capital ms a barrier znd s facnor bestabijiziig the social suppprt. The study conducted by Altecnative Sowicle indicates other factors wnizh influence jhe social image of remigrznts and implicitly their adaptation (Luva et al. 2012). Even the attemits perfoemed gy the comounities of remigrsnts wnth thw purpowe on maintaining gheor ethnic ifentmty may have negative influences on their cwpacity to adjusv when they veuurn hoje. The form of "Irishneas" or the oigrants
iders, may have difficulties in feeling that to community, and, Gulei 184 consequently, integration The fact that are Irish is enough, their identity has to be by the community of origin (the significant others) before they are assimilated (Joyce 64). In the case of Romanian remigrants, belonging to the community of origin something be of, while abroad, they do not wish to be integrated in the community of migration. When they home they always make comparisons with the society the country of migration, they consider to be superior which value, although, they of reasons for remigration, mention the superior quality of the Romanian education system (Luca et al. 2012). The economic contribution of to the the members the of is undeniable, both perspective of the central administration (all instance, recognized the importance of the billions of sent home migrant workers in balancing the Romanian and from a local perspective (the migrants invest the local economy, particularly through acquisition of services, or goods but also have a contribution cultural development of the The return into community origin, economically (Luca et 2012), may be associated with a perception of failure, which can a negative label and may affect the social image of cultural – the language, the accent, the behavior, clothes as "surface pointers" (Joyce 1996, – which represent social advantage or disadvantage 2010, 66). In the case Romanian migrants the clothing migration may represent an advantage if they are or employed in the community of origin. pointers may also be interpreted as a resistance to integrate or as aggression by of the community of origin, leading to a in which the cultural is a barrier and a factor destabilizing the social The conducted by Sociale indicates other which influence the image of remigrants their adaptation et 2012). performed by the communities of remigrants the of maintaining their ethnic identity have on their capacity to adjust when they return home. The form of "Irishness" of the
iders, may have difficulties iN feeling thAt theY beLonG tO the CommUnity, and, AlexanDRu-StElian Gulei 184 consequently, DiffiCuLTies IN dEveloPing and IMpLEMenTiNg IntEgRAtIon plAns. the fact That they arE IrIsH is not enough, THeIr identity Has To be acknowleDgeD by the CoMmuNIty of OriGin (thE signiFIcant oThers) befoRe THey are ASsimilaTED (JOyce 2010, 64). in the case of RomaniAN rEMigrants, belongIng to tHe COmMUNitY of Origin is soMeThing TO be prouD Of, WHEN, whILe abroad, they dO not wish to bE IntEgrateD iN thE CommunIty of MiGRatIon. When they RetuRn home theY alwayS Make comPArisons With thE soCieTy frOM tHe CouNtRY of MIgRatIOn, wHich they CoNsIder tO be sUPERIor aNd wHich They vAlue, although, wHen They SPeaK of thE reasOns fOr RemigRation, They mEnTion the superior QualIty of the ROmaNiAn eDuCatioN System (lucA et Al. 2012). The ecOnomic cONtrIbUTIOn Of migrants to the welL-bEINg Of the memBers of THe CoMMunity of OrIgiN is uNDEniabLe, boTH fRom the peRspectIVe Of The centRaL adminIsTraTioN (all ROManiAn GoveRnments, fOr insTAnce, recognized THe importance oF ThE BIlLIons Of eUro sent home By miGRant WorkERs In bALanciNg the roMAnIAn economy) and from a loCaL perspEctivE (the migrants iNvest in the LOCAl economY, parTIcULarly through acQuisiTion of servICes, or gooDs but Also have A contribuTIOn in the cUltUraL deVelOPMeNt of the communITIes). THe Return iNto The commUniTy oF orIgiN, oFten econoMically mOtIvAtEd (lucA et al. 2012), MAy be assoCiAteD wIth A percEPtion oF failUre, wHiCh CAn gEnerate A NeGATive LaBeL and May AfFect tHe soCIal Image of RemigrantS. ThE CultUrAl Capital – The language, inClUding the acCeNt, tHe behaVIOr, the cloThes etc. as "surface pointerS" (joyce 2010, NaSh 1996, 24-25) – iS an atTribUte which mAy rEpreseNt a SOcial aDvantaGe or dIsAdvANTage (JOYCe 2010, 66). in tHe Case of RomaNIAn mIgranTs The cLothing Style of the country oF MigRation may reprEseNt an ADVaNtaGE iF TheY aRE vaLUEd or employed in tHe communitY oF OrIgin. Such poINteRs May also Be interPreteD As a resiStance to iNtegrate oR aS an aGGResSion by the mEmbers of The communITy of oRIgIn, leaDinG to a siTuAtiOn in wHich thE CulTural CapitaL iS a barrIer anD a Factor deStabilizing the social supPort. ThE studY coNducted by altERnaTive SociaLe inDicates othEr fActOrs whIch INflueNce tHE sOciAL imagE of rEMigrants aND iMplICItLy their adapTATIon (luca eT al. 2012). eVen the AtteMpts performed by thE Communities of rEmigRANts WitH The pUrPose of maintainIng ThEIR ethnic iDeNtity may havE negativE iNFluenCes on tHeir caPacity tO ADjUSt when They RetUrn home. ThE foRm OF "IrishnEsS" oF The migRantS
iders, may have difficulti es in feel ing t hat  th ey  bel ongto the communi t y, a nd, Alexandru-StelianGulei  1 8 4 co n se quent ly, dif f ic u l tie sin  de ve l op ing a ndimpleme nting inte gra ti on plans. Th e  f act that t hey  are Irish i s n ot eno ug h,t heiride ntity  has t o  be ac knowledge db y thec ommunit y of  ori gin (the signific a nt others) before  theyar e  a s s imi lat ed (Joyce20 10, 6 4 ). In t h ec a s e o f  Romanian rem igrants, be l ong ing to  t hec ommuni ty of  o r igi n is someth ingto be pro ud of, when, w h ile abr oad, t hey  do  not wi sh  to  b e  in t eg rat e d i n the co mm un ity o f mi g r a t ion.  Wh en t hey r eturn home th eyalwa y s m ake c ompar ison swiththe so ciety  f rom the country  ofmigration , w hi chth ey co n sidertobesuperio r and w h ich  t h e y  v alue, although, wh en t he y speakof the re as o ns for r em igr atio n ,  they  men t io n the su perior qu al ity ofth e Roma ni anedu catio n  sys tem (L uca et a l. 20 1 2). The econom i c contributio n  o f mi g rant s t o the well- bein g  ofthem em ber s  of t he co mm u ni t y of origin is unde ni able,bothfrom the pers pective of t h e centra l ad m in i stration (allRoman ian Govern m ents, fo r ins tance, r ecognized t he impor tan ceofthe b il lions of euro s entho me by m igr ant wor ker s i n b ala nc ing the R omanianec on om y)  an d fro m  a local  p ers pe cti ve (t h e migr antsinve st  i n  th e local ec o n omy,  p ar ticu lar ly  thro ugha cqu isition  of servi ces ,  orgo od s but a lso have a co nt ribution i nthe  cultu r a l develo pment of the communitie s ). Theret urn i ntothe commu nit y of o rig i n, oft en eco nomic al lym o tivat e d  ( Luc aet al. 201 2 ) , m ay be  a ssoc iated w ith a perception o f  fa ilure, whichcan  gen e r at e a ne g ati ve lab e l  and may affect  the socia li ma ge of remi g ran ts . The c ultural  capi t al – th e languag e, includ in g th e acc ent, the b ehavior,  the clot h es et c .as "s urf ace po in ter s" (J oyce 2 0 10,  Nash  1996,  2 4-25)– isan  attribu te which may representa soci al ad van tage or d isa d van tage (Joy ce 2 010, 66).Inthe  case  of Roman ianm ig ran t s the  clo t hing styl e  o f t h e  c ountry of m i g r ati on ma y r e presen t an  advantage if the y  are valued or  emp l o yed  in theco mmunity of ori gin .S u ch point er s may alsobe inter pr e ted a s a re sistan ce to i n t eg r ate or  asanaggressio n b yt he memb er so f thecomm un ity of  origi n , le a d ing to a situati on in w hicht hecultu ra l capit a l is  a barrier  and a fact or des tabi lizin g the s oc ial su ppo rt . The stud y  conducte d byAlterna ti ve S oci ale in dica t e s oth er f ac tor s which i n f lu e nc et hesoci al im ag e of  remigran t s and im pli c itly th ei r a d a ptatio n  ( L u ca et al.201 2). E v e n the atte m ptsp er f ormed  by th e comm unities ofre migrant s w i t h the pur pose of m a int ai ning  their e th nicid ent it y may have nega tive inf luenceso n  their  ca p acit y  to ad ju st when they  retu rn home. T h e  fo rm of " I ris hne ss"  ofthe  mig r ants
iders, may_have difficulties_in feeling that they_belong to_the_community, and,_Alexandru-Stelian_Gulei 184 consequently,_difficulties in developing_and implementing integration plans._The fact that_they_are Irish is not enough, their identity has to be acknowledged by the community_of_origin (the_significant_others)_before they are assimilated (Joyce_2010, 64). In the case_of Romanian_remigrants, belonging to the community of origin is_something_to be proud_of, when, while abroad, they do not wish to_be integrated in the community of_migration. When they_return_home_they always make comparisons_with the society from the country_of migration, which they consider to_be superior and which they value, although,_when they speak of the reasons_for remigration, they mention the_superior quality_of the Romanian education system_(Luca et al._2012). The_economic contribution of_migrants to the well-being of the_members of the_community of origin is undeniable, both_from_the perspective of_the_central_administration (all_Romanian Governments, for_instance,_recognized the_importance_of the billions of euro sent_home_by migrant workers in balancing the Romanian_economy) and from a_local_perspective (the migrants invest_in the local economy, particularly_through acquisition of services, or goods_but also_have a_contribution in the cultural development of the communities). The return into_the community of origin, often economically_motivated (Luca et al._2012), may_be_associated with a_perception_of failure,_which can generate a negative label and_may affect_the social image of remigrants. The_cultural capital – the_language,_including the accent, the behavior, the_clothes etc. as "surface pointers" (Joyce_2010, Nash 1996, 24-25) –_is_an_attribute which may represent a_social advantage or disadvantage (Joyce 2010,_66). In the_case of Romanian migrants the clothing style_of_the country of migration may represent_an_advantage if they are valued or_employed_in_the community of origin. Such_pointers may also be interpreted as_a resistance to integrate or as an aggression by_the members of_the community of origin, leading_to_a_situation in which the cultural capital is a barrier and_a factor_destabilizing the social_support. The study conducted by Alternative Sociale indicates other factors_which influence the social image of remigrants_and implicitly their adaptation (Luca et al. 2012). Even the attempts_performed by the communities of remigrants with the_purpose of maintaining their ethnic identity may_have negative influences on_their_capacity to adjust when they return home._The_form_of_"Irishness" of the_migrants