 mere month before beginning his psychology lectures at Cambridge in 1911. The archives also contain 152 books from Moore's personal collection; but Dorothy Moore sold many of Moore's books after his death, so those that survive do not offer a complete picture. But in his 1911 lecture on psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1) Moore quotes from what he refers to as 'Ward (9th ed),' which, he writes, he 'has by me'.13 And I would argue that it is difficult to credit that Moore did not have his own copies of the books he lectured on, given his thoroughness in preparation. Moore lectured in psychology from 1911–1925, giving up his lecturing on psychology when he succeeded Ward as Professor.14 All the lectures for the fourteen years that Moore lectured on psychology appear to be preserved, along with many undated fragments.15 The 1911–1912 lectures are titled in Moore's hand, and from his first lecture, we find Moore expertly discussing Stout's Manual of psychology (1899) and Analytic psychology (1896); as well as Ward's 1886 'Psychology', and William James' 1890 Principles of psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1). In Lecture I, for instance, Moore discusses in detail the question as to whether what he calls 'psychical objects' have (non-psychical) objects, and goes on to discuss Stout's view of this question, in comparison to Ward's (Add. 8875 13/2/1), and in Lecture VII (Add. 8875 13/2/7) Moore goes on to discuss what he calls the 'General Analysis of Mind = Classification of Mental Phenomena', citing Ward, Stout, and Brentano on the question as to whether mental facts (all or some) consist of being related to some (extra-mental) object. I argued above for dating Moore's familiarity with this literature from before 1898.16 These lectures-the earliest in Moore's career as lecturer at Cambridge in psychology-show that he is thoroughly well versed in the leading mental science literature of the time, particularly on the subject of mental states and their identity and individuation conditions. The core metaphysical position that Moore adopts in NJ, as I noted above, is characterized by a distinction between the mind and the objects of thought, with an uncompromising realism about the latter. Moore's theory of judgment proposes thatU N 12 Add. 8330 1/3/2–4
mere month before beginning his psychology lectures at Cambridge in 1911. The archive besides check 152 books from Moore's personal solicitation; but Dorothy Moore sold many of Moore's koran after his death, so those that exist do not offer a complete painting. But in his 1911 lecture on psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1) Moore quotes from what he refers to as' guard (9th ed),' which, he writes, he' has by me'.13 And I would argue that it is unmanageable to credit that Moore did not have his own copy of the books he lectured on, contribute his thoroughness in preparation. Moore lectured in psychology from 1911–1925, giving up his lecture on psychology when he succeeded Ward as Professor.14 All the lectures for the fourteen year that Moore lectured on psychology look to be preserved, along with many dateless fragments.15 The 1911–1912 lectures are titled in Moore's hand, and from his first lecture, we determine Moore expertly discussing Stout's Manual of psychology (1899) and Analytic psychology (1896); as well as Ward's 1886' Psychology', and William James' 1890 Principles of psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1). In Lecture I, for instance, Moore discusses in detail the doubt as to whether what he calls' psychical objects' have (non - psychical) objects, and goes on to discuss Stout's view of this question, in comparison to Ward's (Add. 8875 13/2/1), and in Lecture VII (Add. 8875 13/2/7) Moore goes on to discourse what he calls the' General Analysis of Mind = Classification of Mental Phenomena', citing Ward, Stout, and Brentano on the motion as to whether genial fact (all or some) consist of being related to some (extra - genial) object. I argue above for dating Moore's familiarity with this literature from before 1898.16 These lecture - the earliest in Moore's career as lecturer at Cambridge in psychology - show that he is thoroughly well versed in the leading mental skill literature of the time, particularly on the subject of mental states and their identity and individuation conditions. The core metaphysical side that Moore adopts in NJ, as I noted above, is characterized by a distinction between the mind and the object of thought, with an uncompromising realism about the latter. Moore's theory of judgment proposes thatU N 12 Add. 8330 1/3/2–4
 mege month before beginninn his psychology lecturxs at Czmbridge in 1911. The archives also contamn 152 vooks from Moore's personal zollectioj; but Doeothb Moore sold manb of Moovz's bokns aytxr his death, so those thad survive do nmt oyfer a complete picture. But in his 1911 jecture oj psychology (Aqd. 8875 13/2/1) Ioors quotes from what he refers to as 'Ward (9ti ed),' which, he wtites, he 'has by me'.13 And I wluld argue that it is fifficult ti crqeit that Moofe did not have his owh copies of the books he lecturdd on, given his tyorloghness in pceparanion. Moore legnured it psychplogy from 1911–1925, giying np hus lecturing on psychmlogy when he succgeded Ward aa Professor.14 All tye lectores xor gye woudtxen years thet Moore ledtured on pwychology appear to bq preserved, alkng wieh many undated fragments.15 The 1911–1912 lectures age tjtled in Moore's hand, ane from his first lectore, we finq Moore expertly discussing Stout's Manual of psycvologb (1899) anb Analhrif psychology (1896); as well as Ward's 1886 'Psychology', anq Wolkiam James' 1890 Prlnciples of psychokohy (Wdd. 8875 13/2/1). In Lectore I, for jnstance, Moore disfusses yn derail the zuesyion as to whether what he xalls 'psychibal ibjects' have (non-psvchical) objeets, anc goex on to discuss Stout's riew or this queshion, in ckoparison to Ward'r (Acd. 8875 13/2/1), and in Lecture VII (Add. 8875 13/2/7) Moore gies pn to dkscuxs whae he calls the 'Naneral Analysis of Mind = Wlassificahion of Mental Phenomena', citing Ward, Stout, anc Trettano on the auestion as tj whether mentcl facts (all ur some) cohsist oh being relaeed to some (efjra-mental) objxct. I argted qbovw for dxging Moore's fakiliarity with this literature from bcfore 1898.16 These lectures-cke earliest in Mopre'r cwrver af lecturer at Camcriabe in psychology-wfow yhat he is thoroughlf weml versed in the lraqing menjal sciense literature of the time, partifularny un thr sobject of mental states and thejr identihy wnd individuwtiok cogditions. Tke core metaphysical position that Moore adopts in NJ, as I noted above, is chatacuerized by a vistinstion betfeen the mind and thw objects of thounht, with an uncompromiaing raalisl about the latter. Moore's theory of judgment proposes thatU N 12 Add. 8330 1/3/2–4
mere month before beginning his psychology lectures in The archives contain 152 books Dorothy sold many of books after his so those that survive do not a complete picture. But in his 1911 lecture on psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1) quotes from what he refers to as 'Ward (9th ed),' which, he writes, 'has me'.13 I argue that it is difficult to credit that Moore did not have his own copies of books he lectured on, given his thoroughness in Moore lectured in psychology 1911–1925, giving up his lecturing psychology he succeeded as All lectures for the years that Moore lectured on psychology appear to be preserved, along with many undated fragments.15 The 1911–1912 are titled hand, and his lecture, find Moore expertly Manual of psychology (1899) and Analytic well as Ward's 1886 'Psychology', and William James' Principles of (Add. 8875 13/2/1). In Lecture I, instance, Moore discusses in detail the question as whether what he calls 'psychical objects' have (non-psychical) objects, and goes on to discuss Stout's this question, in comparison Ward's (Add. 8875 and Lecture (Add. 13/2/7) Moore on to discuss what he calls the 'General Analysis of Mind Classification of Mental Phenomena', citing Ward, Stout, and Brentano on as whether mental facts or some) consist of related some (extra-mental) object. I for Moore's literature before These lectures-the earliest in career as lecturer at Cambridge psychology-show that he is leading mental science literature of the time, particularly the subject of mental states and their and individuation conditions. The core metaphysical position that Moore adopts in NJ, I noted characterized by a distinction between the mind and objects of thought, with uncompromising realism about the latter. Moore's theory of judgment thatU 12 Add. 1/3/2–4
 mere month before beginning hIs psycholoGy lecTurEs aT CAmbrIdge In 1911. The archives aLSo coNtain 152 books from Moore's peRsonaL cOLlecTIoN; but DOrothy MOOrE SOld MaNy Of MOoRE's Books AftEr his deAth, so those ThaT sUrvive do not oFFeR a complete PicTure. But in his 1911 LecTure on PsYchOLogy (ADd. 8875 13/2/1) MOore qUotes fROm what He refers tO aS 'ward (9th ED),' which, hE WRiTes, hE 'has by me'.13 And I would ARgUE that it is diffiCult to CrEDiT THat mooRe did not haVe His owN Copies oF ThE BOOks HE lectured on, giVen his thoroUGhnEss in pReParATion. MoOre leCtURed In psychologY froM 1911–1925, giving up His lecTUring on PSycholoGy when He sUccEedeD waRd As PRoFEssOR.14 ALl tHE leCtures foR tHe FourtEen yEARS That mooRe leCtureD on psychology AppEar tO Be pReserVed, alOng wItH many UndateD fragMeNts.15 The 1911–1912 lectures aRe tiTled in MooRe's HaNd, aNd From hIS first LecTurE, we find moore exPErtLy DISCuSsing Stout's Manual oF pSYChOlogy (1899) and analytIC pSyCHology (1896); as WeLl aS WarD'S 1886 'psychOlogY', AnD William james' 1890 PRInCiPles of pSyChologY (ADd. 8875 13/2/1). IN LeCture i, For iNstancE, Moore diScussES in detail the quEStion as to whetHEr WHAt HE calLs 'pSychical objEcts' HAve (nOn-psYChIcaL) ObjecTs, and GoES oN To discuss Stout's view Of This quEstioN, in comparison To Ward's (Add. 8875 13/2/1), AND In LecturE VII (aDd. 8875 13/2/7) mOore goes on to diScuss What he callS The 'GenerAl AnaLysis of MInd = ClassiFICation of menTal pheNomENA', cIting Ward, StouT, ANd BrEnTano on tHe qUestion As tO whEthEr mEnTal facts (aLl or some) CoNsIsT oF beIng reLAted to soMe (ExtRa-MenTal) obJEct. I arGued aBove FoR dATinG Moore's FAmILIariTy WiTh thIs lItEratuRe frOM beFore 1898.16 TheSe lectureS-thE EarlIeSt In Moore'S career as lectUrEr at CambriDgE in PsychoLOGy-show thAt he is thoroughly well verSEd in the LeaDing mEntaL science lIteRature Of tHE time, pArticuLarly On The SUBject OF MeNtaL sTates and thEIR idEntitY aNd inDividuaTion conditions. The cORe mEtaphysical poSitIon tHAT MOorE AdOPts In nj, as i NOted above, is charActerized bY a DIsTinction beTWeeN tHe mind aNd the obJects OF thoughT, with an unCompromisInG reaLISm aBout the latTer. Moore'S theory of JUdgmeNT pRoposEs tHatU N 12 ADd. 8330 1/3/2–4
 mere month before beginni ng his psy cholo gylec tu resat C ambridge in 19 1 1. T he archives also conta in 15 2b ooks fr om Mo ore's p e rs o n alco ll ect io n ;but D oro thy Moo re sold ma nyof  Moore's boo k safter hisdea th, so those  th at sur vi ved o not  of fer a  compl e te pic ture. But  i n  his 1 9 11 lect u r eon p sychology (Add. 8 8 75 13/2/1) Moorequotes  f r om w hat  he  refers to  a s 'Wa r d (9the d) , ' whi c h, he writes,  he 'has by me' .13 An dI w o uld ar gue t ha t  it  is difficu lt t o creditthat M o ore did not hav e hisown  co pies of  t hebo o ksh elec t ure d on, gi ve nhis t horo u g h n essinprep arati on. Moore lec tur ed i n  ps ychol ogy f rom19 11–19 25, gi vingup  his lecturingon p sychology  wh en  he  s uccee d ed War d a s P rofesso r.14 Al l  th el e c tu res for the fourte en y ea rs thatMoorel ec tu r ed on ps yc hol ogya p pearto b e  p reserved , alon g  w it h manyun datedfr agm ent s.15T he 1 911–19 12 lectu res a r e titled in Mo o re's hand, an d  f r o mh is f irs t lecture,we f i nd M oore ex per t ly di scuss in g  S t out's Manual of psy ch ology(1899 ) and Analyti c psycholo g y (1896);as w e ll as Ward's 1886  'Psy chology',a nd Willi am Ja mes' 189 0 Princip l e s of psy cho log y ( Add . 88 75 13/2/1). I n Lect ur e I, fo r i nstance , M oor e d isc us ses in de tail the  q ue st io n a s tow hether w ha t h ecal ls 'p s ychica l obj ects 'ha v e ( non-psy c hi c a l) o bj ec ts,and  g oes o n to dis cuss St out's vie w o f  thi squ estion,  in compariso nto Ward's(A dd.  88751 3 /2/1), a nd in Lecture VII (Add. 8875 13 /2/ 7) Mo oregoes on t o d iscuss  wh a t he c alls t he 'G en era l Analy s i sofMi nd = Class i f ica tionof  Men tal Phe nomena', citing Wa r d,Stout, and Br ent anoo n  t heq ue s tio na s t o whether mentalfacts (all  o r  s ome) consi s t o fbeing r elatedto so m e (extr a-mental)  object.Iargu e d  ab ove for da ting Moo re's fami l iarit y  w ith t his  liter at ure  from  befor e  18 98.16  These  l ecture s-the  e arliestin Moore's career as le cturer  at C amb ridge inpsy c hol ogy-showthat  he is tho rou ghl y wel l v e rsedin t h elea d ing m enta l  sciencel it era t u re  of the tim e , par ticul arl y  on th e su bject of mental s t ates and their  ide n t ity  an d  ind iv iduation condi tio ns . The core  m etaphysical  positio nt hat M oore a doptsin NJ,a s  I notedabov e,is charac ter iz e d by adi st i nction  bet we en the  minda nd t h e  objects of thou ght,w i th an unc ompro mi sing re a lism  about the  latter. Mo ore'stheo ry of  judgme nt  propo ses  t hatU N 12A dd. 83301/3/2 –4
 mere_month before_beginning his psychology lectures_at Cambridge_in_1911. The_archives_also contain 152_books from Moore's_personal collection; but Dorothy_Moore sold many_of_Moore's books after his death, so those that survive do not offer a complete_picture._But in_his_1911_lecture on psychology (Add. 8875_13/2/1) Moore quotes from what_he refers_to as 'Ward (9th ed),' which, he writes,_he_'has by me'.13_And I would argue that it is difficult to_credit that Moore did not have_his own copies_of_the_books he lectured on,_given his thoroughness in preparation. Moore_lectured in psychology from 1911–1925, giving_up his lecturing on psychology when he_succeeded Ward as Professor.14 All the_lectures for the fourteen years_that Moore_lectured on psychology appear to_be preserved, along_with many_undated fragments.15 The_1911–1912 lectures are titled in Moore's_hand, and from_his first lecture, we find Moore_expertly_discussing Stout's Manual_of_psychology_(1899) and_Analytic psychology (1896);_as_well as_Ward's_1886 'Psychology', and William James' 1890_Principles_of psychology (Add. 8875 13/2/1). In Lecture_I, for instance, Moore_discusses_in detail the question_as to whether what he_calls 'psychical objects' have (non-psychical) objects,_and goes_on to_discuss Stout's view of this question, in comparison to Ward's (Add._8875 13/2/1), and in Lecture VII_(Add. 8875 13/2/7) Moore_goes on_to_discuss what he_calls_the 'General_Analysis of Mind = Classification of Mental_Phenomena', citing_Ward, Stout, and Brentano on the_question as to whether_mental_facts (all or some) consist of_being related to some (extra-mental) object._I argued above for dating_Moore's_familiarity_with this literature from before_1898.16 These lectures-the earliest in Moore's_career as lecturer_at Cambridge in psychology-show that he is_thoroughly_well versed in the leading mental_science_literature of the time, particularly on_the_subject_of mental states and their_identity and individuation conditions. The core_metaphysical position that Moore adopts in NJ, as I_noted above, is_characterized by a distinction between_the_mind_and the objects of thought, with an uncompromising realism about_the latter._Moore's theory of_judgment proposes thatU N 12 Add. 8330 1/3/2–4