 lay people, as an enthusiastic citizen [...] of a Europe of people that follows its path and that to a certain extent finds itself already part of the world?" A Europe, he writes, "Understood as a mixed, unique and supranational society, whose members surprisingly blend differences that really exist between, them instead of recanting or repressing them. People who have learned to adapt 1 http://www.resetdoc.org/story/00000022381/translate/English RESET DOC, Friday, 11 April 2014 2 and complete their identities and continue to develop them." We are, no doubt, pleased with the coexistence of different visions of the world, subjective forms of belonging and identities that peacefully develop together, arising from "a personal past that is not, however, unknown to others" or "a combination of pasts in which nowadays - " following the end of territorial wars in western Europe – we are able to recognise, respect and link together in our lives and jobs different and particular expressions of a general conditio europaea if not humana." However, the creation of a sociality area, in which Streeck states he feels "happily at home" cannot be separated from, in fact it depends on, the political-institutional organisation that Konrad Adenauer, Alcide De Gasperi, Robert Schuman, Jean Monnet and other constituent fathers imagined they would create to eliminate the sources of the most virulent nationalisms. It was a project that nowadays is the only credible possibility for setting up shared opposition to the undesirable consequences of globalisation presenting surprising opportunities, but just as many risk factors to European populations. As Haberman emphasises, there is no doubt that the implementation of a European project is the only solution for the lost sovereignty of state organisation that, without conflicts, has constitutionalised those civil, political, social and cultural rights that Streeck intends to defend from "the advance of neoliberalism organised in a supranational manner." While there is no margin of "opposition" outside the European Union, but perhaps it would be best to speak of regulation of social relations, one must also say that such an objective cannot be achieved outside the pact-based framework created so far, that must not be abandoned but reformed. This reform should on one hand involve a balancing of policies imposing rigour on state budgets with economic growth and social cohesion, and on the other, a strengthening of the democratic procedures legitimising EU institutions[6]. One must criticise the "
lay people, as an enthusiastic citizen [... ] of a Europe of people that follows its way and that to a sealed extent discover itself already part of the populace? " A Europe, he write, " Understood as a mixed, singular and supranational company, whose members amazingly blend dispute that really exist between, them rather of recanting or repressing them. multitude who have learn to adapt 1 http://www.resetdoc.org/story/00000022381/translate/English RESET DOC, Friday, 11 April 2014 2 and dispatch their identities and stay to evolve them. " We are, no doubt, pleased with the coexistence of different visions of the worldly concern, subjective forms of belonging and identities that peacefully evolve together, arising from " a personal past that is not, however, unknown to others " or " a combination of pasts in which nowadays - " following the goal of territorial wars in western Europe – we are able to recognise, respect and link together in our lives and jobs different and particular expressions of a general conditio europaea if not humana. " However, the creation of a sociality area, in which Streeck states he feels " happily at home " cannot be separate from, in fact it depends on, the political - institutional organisation that Konrad Adenauer, Alcide De Gasperi, Robert Schuman, Jean Monnet and early component don imagined they would create to rule out the sources of the most virulent nationalisms. It was a project that nowadays is the only credible possibility for adjust up shared opposition to the undesirable consequences of globalisation presenting surprising opportunities, but precisely as many risk factors to European populations. As Haberman emphasises, there be no doubt that the execution of a European undertaking is the lone solution for the lost sovereignty of state constitution that, without conflicts, has constitutionalised those civil, political, social and cultural rights that Streeck mean to defend from " the advance of neoliberalism organised in a supranational manner. " While there is no allowance of " opposition " outside the European Union, but possibly it would be best to speak of regulation of social relations, one must also state that such an objective cannot be achieve outside the pact - based model created so far, that must not be abandoned but reformed. This reform should on one hand necessitate a balancing of policies imposing rigour on state budgets with economic growth and social cohesion, and on the other, a strengthening of the democratic procedure legitimising EU institutions[6 ]. One must criticise the "
 laj people, as an enthusiasuic citizen [...] of a Europe of pekple thag follows its path and that vo a certqin extent finds itselw already part of the qorld?" A Euckpe, he writes, "Mndervvood as a mixed, unique ang supranationan roeiety, whose members surprisingly blegd diffrrfnces that reajly txift bsnwten, them instead of recanting or depresspng them. People wno have learned to adapt 1 jttp://aww.resetdoc.org/storj/00000022381/translate/Ebglify RESET DOC, Wriday, 11 Apgnl 2014 2 and cojplete their identities and conginue to develok fhfk." We are, no doubn, pleased witm the cmexistemce of differekt viviobs of the world, subjertive forms of belonding and hdzntities that peacefuolt devglop dogegyer, arjsmng from "w pxrsonal pasf that is nit, however, unknown uo jnners" or "a cojbinatyog of pasts in which nowadays - " followinc tge end of territorial wqrs in western Europe – we are wble to recognise, respect and link together in ous livxs anb jobs eivferent and particular expressions of a generwm vokditio europaea lf not humana." Howefeg, yre creation ow a soejamity area, in which Streech stares he fetls "hsppily at home" cannot be separated from, un fact it depends on, the polntical-onstiyutional organisation tkat Kohrad Adenaufr, Alcide Ae Gasperi, Roberg Sbhumdn, Jean Monnet and other cjnstituenv fatkers imaeinec they would crewte to eliminate the sougces lf the most girulent nationalisms. It was a 'coject that npwddajs is the only credible posfibility for sgtting up shardd oppositpon to thx undesirablq consequencev of globalisetion prefentung wurpriskvg opportunitirs, but just as many risk factors to Emropexh populations. Aw Hqberman emphasixes, thqrv ix gm doubt that the imokemengation of a Durolean project is the mnly solution for the koft sovergignty of state organixation that, withouu confnicvs, has cogstitutionalised those civil, pklitical, doclal and cultuwal vighjs that Strzeck intends to defend from "the advance if neoliberalism oeganised in a suprauauional manner." Whilq there iv no margin of "opposution" outside the European Union, but psrhaps it wluld be best to speak of regulation of social relations, one must also say that such an objedtivr cantoc bz achieded lntside the pact-baxed framework created so far, thet must nod ye abandoned but reformed. Thix feform should on one hand involve a bzlancing of policies imposing rigour on state budgets with econpmic groqth ahd socpzl cohesion, and on tne othzr, a srrengthwninn of the democfatoc procedurfs ltgitnmising EU institutions[6]. One must xriticusf the "
lay people, as an enthusiastic citizen [...] Europe people that its path and finds already part of world?" A Europe, writes, "Understood as a mixed, unique supranational society, whose members surprisingly blend differences that really exist between, them instead recanting or repressing them. People who have learned to adapt 1 http://www.resetdoc.org/story/00000022381/translate/English RESET Friday, April 2 complete their identities and continue to develop them." We are, no doubt, pleased with the coexistence different visions of the world, subjective forms of and identities that peacefully together, arising from "a personal that not, however, to or combination of pasts which nowadays - " following the end of territorial wars in western Europe – we are able recognise, respect together in lives jobs and particular expressions general conditio europaea if not humana." of a sociality area, in which Streeck states feels "happily home" cannot be separated from, in it depends on, the political-institutional organisation that Konrad Alcide De Gasperi, Robert Schuman, Jean Monnet and other constituent fathers imagined they would create the sources of the virulent nationalisms. It a that is only credible for setting up shared opposition to the undesirable consequences of globalisation surprising opportunities, but just as many risk factors to European Haberman there is no that the implementation of European is the only solution lost of without has those civil, political, social cultural rights that Streeck intends defend from "the advance supranational manner." While there is no margin of outside the European Union, but perhaps it be best to speak of regulation of social relations, one must also that such cannot be achieved outside the pact-based framework created far, that must not abandoned but reformed. This reform should on one hand a of policies rigour on state with economic growth social cohesion, and other, a of democratic institutions[6]. One must criticise the "
 lay people, as an enthusiastic Citizen [...] of a europE of PeoPlE thaT folLows its path and THat tO a certain extent finds itSelf aLrEAdy pARt Of the World?" A EURoPE, He wRiTeS, "UnDeRStOod as A miXed, uniqUe and supraNatIoNal society, whOSe Members surPriSingly blend dIffErenceS tHat REally ExiSt betWeen, thEM insteAd of recanTiNG or repREssing tHEM. PEoplE who have learned to ADaPT 1 http://www.resetdOc.org/sToRY/00000022381/tRANslAte/english RESeT dOC, FrIDay, 11 ApriL 2014 2 AnD COMplETe their identiTies and contINue To deveLoP thEM." We are, No douBt, PLeaSed with the cOexiStence of dIffereNT visionS Of the woRld, subJecTivE forMS oF bEloNgINg aND iDenTItiEs that peAcEfUlly dEvelOP TOGethEr, aRisiNg froM "a personal pasT thAt is NOt, hOweveR, unknOwn tO oThers" Or "a comBinatIoN of pasts in which NowaDays - " folloWinG tHe eNd Of terRItoriaL waRs iN westerN Europe – WE arE aBLE To Recognise, respect anD lINK tOgether iN our liVEs AnD Jobs diffErEnt And pARTiculAr exPReSsions of A generAL cOnDitio euRoPaea if NoT huManA." HoweVEr, thE creatIon of a soCialiTY area, in which StREeck states he fEElS "HApPIly aT hoMe" cannot be sEparATed fRom, iN FaCt iT DepenDs on, tHe POlITical-institutional oRgAnisatIon thAt Konrad AdenaUer, Alcide DE gASperi, RobErt SCHuMAn, Jean Monnet anD otheR constitueNT fathers ImagiNed they wOuld creatE TO eliminaTe tHe sOurCes OF ThE most virulent NATionAlIsms. It wAs a Project ThaT noWadAys Is The only crEdible poSsIbIlItY foR settINg up sharEd OppOsItiOn to tHE undesIrablE conSeQuENceS of globALiSATion PrEsEntiNg sUrPrisiNg opPOrtUnities, But just as ManY Risk FaCtOrs to EuRopean populatIoNs. As HabermAn EmpHasiseS, THere is no Doubt that the implementatIOn of a EuRopEan prOjecT is the onlY soLution For THe lost SovereIgnty Of StaTE OrganISAtIon ThAt, without cONFliCts, haS cOnstItutionAlised those civil, poLItiCal, social and cUltUral RIGhTs tHAt sTreEcK IntENDs to defend from "tHe advance oF nEOlIberalism oRGanIsEd in a suPranatiOnal mANner." WhiLe there is No margin oF "oPposITIon" Outside the european union, but pERhaps IT wOuld bE beSt to spEaK of RegulAtion oF SocIal reLationS, oNe must Also sAy That such An objective cannot be achiEved ouTside The Pact-based FraMEwoRk created So faR, that must nOt bE abAndonEd bUT refoRmed. tHiS reFOrm shOuld ON one hand iNVoLve A BAlAncing of polICIEs iMposiNg rIGour on StatE budgets with econoMIc growth and socIal cOHEsiOn, aND on tHe Other, a strengthEniNg OF The democRaTic procedurEs legitiMiSIng EU InstitUtions[6]. one must CRItICise thE "
 lay people, as an enthusi astic citi zen [ ... ] o fa Eu rope  of people tha t  fol lows its path and that  to a  c e rtai n  e xtent  findsi ts e l f a lr ea dypa r tof th e w orld?"A Europe,hewr ites, "Under s to od as a mi xed , unique and  su pranat io nal socie ty,  whos e memb e rs sur prisingly  b l end di f ference s th at r eally exist betwe e n, them instead o f reca nt i ng o r r epr essing the m.  Peop l e who h a ve l e arn e d to adapt 1http://www. r ese tdoc.o rg /st o ry/000 00022 38 1 /tr anslate/Eng lish  RESET DO C, Fri d ay, 11A pril 20 14 2 a ndcom plet e  t he irid e nti t ie s a n d c ontinueto  d evelo p th e m . "  Weare , no  doub t, pleased wi ththec oex isten ce of  dif fe rentvision s ofth e world, subjec tive  forms of  be lo ngi ng  andi dentit ies  th at peac efullyd eve lo p t og ether, arising fro m" a  p ersonalpast t h at  i s  not, ho we ver , un k n own t o ot h er s" or "a  combi n at io n of pa st s in w hi chnow adays - "follow ing theend o f  territorial w a rs in western Eu r o pe – we  ar e able to r ecog n ise,  res p ec t a n d lin k tog et h er in our lives and jo bs  diffe rentand particula r expressi o n s  of a ge nera l  c o nditio europae a ifnot humana . " Howeve r, th e creati on of a s o c iality a rea , i n w hic h St reeck statesh e  fee ls  "happi lyat home " c ann otbese parated f rom, infa ct  i tdep endso n, the p ol iti ca l-i nstit u tional  orga nisa ti on tha t Konra d  A d e naue r,  A lcid e D eGaspe ri,R obe rt Schu man, Jean  Mo n netan dother c onstituent fa th ers imagin ed  th ey wou l d  createto eliminate the source s  of the  mo st vi rule nt nation ali sms. I t w a s a pr ojectthatno wad a y s ist h eonl ycredible p o s sib ility  f or s ettingup shared oppositi o n t o the undesir abl e co n s eq uen c es ofgl o bal i s ation presentin g surprisi ng op portunitie s , b ut  just a s manyriskf actorsto Europe an popula ti ons. A s H aberman em phasises , there i s  no d o ub t tha t t he imp le men tatio n of a Eur opean  proje ct  is th e onl ysolution  for the lost sovereign ty ofstate  or ganisatio n t h at,  withoutconf licts, has  co nst ituti ona l isedthos e  c ivi l , pol itic a l, social an d c u l tu ral rightst h a t S treec k i n tendsto d efend from "the a d vance of neoli bera l i smorg a nise din a supranati ona lm a nner." W hi le there is  no marg in of "o pposit ion" o utsidet h eE uropea n Un ion , but per hap si t would  b eb est to  spe ak  of re gulati o n of s ocial relations,  onem u st al s o s ay th at  such a n  obj ective can not be achi eved o utsi de th e pact- ba sed fr ame wo rk created so far, t hat m ust not  b e ab and oned b ut r e f ormed . Th is  re form shou l d  o n  o ne han d in volve  a  bal ancing of policies  im p osing r ig our o n stat e  b u d gets witheco nomic g rowth ands ocia l  c o hesio n, and  on th e other ,  ast rengthe nin g of the de mocraticp roc ed ures  legitim is ingEU  in st itutions[6]. On e must c riticise t he "
 lay_people, as_an enthusiastic citizen [...]_of a_Europe_of people_that_follows its path_and that to_a certain extent finds_itself already part_of_the world?" A Europe, he writes, "Understood as a mixed, unique and supranational society,_whose_members surprisingly_blend_differences_that really exist between, them_instead of recanting or repressing_them. People_who have learned to adapt 1 http://www.resetdoc.org/story/00000022381/translate/English RESET_DOC,_Friday, 11 April_2014 2 and complete their identities and continue to_develop them." We are, no doubt,_pleased with the_coexistence_of_different visions of the_world, subjective forms of belonging and_identities that peacefully develop together, arising_from "a personal past that is not,_however, unknown to others" or "a_combination of pasts in which_nowadays -_" following the end of_territorial wars in_western Europe_– we are_able to recognise, respect and link_together in our_lives and jobs different and particular_expressions_of a general_conditio_europaea_if not_humana." However, the_creation_of a_sociality_area, in which Streeck states he_feels_"happily at home" cannot be separated from,_in fact it depends_on,_the political-institutional organisation that_Konrad Adenauer, Alcide De Gasperi,_Robert Schuman, Jean Monnet and other_constituent fathers_imagined they_would create to eliminate the sources of the most virulent nationalisms._It was a project that nowadays_is the only credible_possibility for_setting_up shared opposition_to_the undesirable_consequences of globalisation presenting surprising opportunities, but_just as_many risk factors to European populations._As Haberman emphasises, there_is_no doubt that the implementation of_a European project is the only_solution for the lost sovereignty_of_state_organisation that, without conflicts, has_constitutionalised those civil, political, social and_cultural rights that_Streeck intends to defend from "the advance_of_neoliberalism organised in a supranational manner."_While_there is no margin of "opposition"_outside_the_European Union, but perhaps it_would be best to speak of_regulation of social relations, one must also say that_such an objective_cannot be achieved outside the_pact-based_framework_created so far, that must not be abandoned but reformed._This reform_should on one_hand involve a balancing of policies imposing rigour on state_budgets with economic growth and social cohesion,_and on the other, a strengthening of the democratic procedures legitimising_EU institutions[6]. One must criticise the "