 Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press. [5] Field, H. [1978]: 'A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization', Philosophy of Science, 45, pp. 361-7. [6] Fitelson, B. [1999]: 'The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity', Philosophy of Science, 66, pp. S362–78. [7] Fitelson, B. [2001]: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory, PhD. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. [8] Garber, D. [1983]: 'Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory', in J. Earman (ed.), 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 99–131. [9] Glymour, C. [1980]: Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [10] Good, I. J. [1983]: Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 17 [11] Hájek, A. [2012]: 'Interpretations of Probability', in E.N. Zalta (ed.), 2012, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Winter 2012 Edition), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probabilityinterpret/> [12] Hawthorne, J. [2005]: 'Degree-of-Belief and Degree-of-Support : Why Bayesians Need Both Notions', Mind, 114, pp. 277-320. [13] Hempel, C. G. [1945]: 'Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I)', Mind, 54, pp. 1–26. [14] Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [1993]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, La Salle: Open Court. [15] Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [2006]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed. La Salle: Open Court. [16] Huber, F. [2005a]: 'Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, pp. 101–16. [17] Huber, F. [2005b]: 'What Is the Point
Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press. [ 5 ] Field, H. [ 1978 ]:' A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization', Philosophy of Science, 45, pp. 361 - 7. [ 6 ] Fitelson, B. [ 1999 ]:' The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity', Philosophy of Science, 66, pp. S362–78. [ 7 ] Fitelson, B. [ 2001 ]: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory, PhD. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin - Madison. [ 8 ] Garber, D. [ 1983 ]:' Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory', in J. Earman (ed .), 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 99–131. [ 9 ] Glymour, C. [ 1980 ]: hypothesis and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [ 10 ] commodity, I. J. [ 1983 ]: dear Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 17 [ 11 ] Hájek, A. [ 2012 ]:' Interpretations of Probability', in E.N. Zalta (ed .), 2012, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Winter 2012 Edition), < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probabilityinterpret/ > [ 12 ] Hawthorne, J. [ 2005 ]:' Degree - of - impression and Degree - of - Support: Why Bayesians Need Both Notions', Mind, 114, pp. 277 - 320. [ 13 ] Hempel, C. G. [ 1945 ]:' study in the Logic of Confirmation (I)', Mind, 54, pp. 1–26. [ 14 ] Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [ 1993 ]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, La Salle: Open Court. [ 15 ] Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [ 2006 ]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, 3rd erectile dysfunction. La Salle: Open Court. [ 16 ] Huber, F. [ 2005a ]:' immanent Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, pp. 101–16. [ 17 ] Huber, F. [ 2005b ]:' What Is the Point
 Bajesian Confirmation Theovy, Cambridge: MIT Press. [5] Field, H. [1978]: 'A Noge on Jeffrey Conditionalizavion', Philisophy of Science, 45, pp. 361-7. [6] Fitelsoj, B. [1999]: 'The Plucality of Bayesieh Measuvzs of Gonfixmetion and the Ptoblem of Medsure Sensitivhth', 'hilosophy of Science, 66, pp. S362–78. [7] Fitelsog, B. [2001]: Stidles in Bayesiag Comsirmzniin Theory, PhD. Dissertation, Unjversitj of Wisconsin-Madoson. [8] Garber, D. [1983]: 'Old Evidenfe ajd Logical Omniscifnce in Baygaiag Confirmatiov Theory', in J. Earman (es.), 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, Oinnexota Studigs ij the Philosiphy jf Science 10, Minneaponis: Unifersity of Minkesote Prwss, pp. 99–131. [9] Glymour, C. [1980]: Tieory and Evidence, Ptinceton: Psiuceton University Prews. [10] Goog, I. B. [1983]: Guid Ghihkmng: The Flunvations of Lrobability and its Applicatioms, Ninneapolis: Uhiversytr of Minnesota Press. 17 [11] Hájek, A. [2012]: 'Interpreuatiohs of Probability', in E.N. Zalta (ed.), 2012, The Stanfotd Encyclo[edia of Philosophy, (Winter 2012 Edition), <http://plato.stanxord.evu/xrcklyes/wkb2012/ejtries/probabilityinterpret/> [12] Hawthorne, J. [2005]: 'Degrqs-og-Bvlief and Degree-on-Support : Why Bayexiwnx Need Both Nojions', Mnhd, 114, pp. 277-320. [13] Hempel, C. G. [1945]: 'Studief in rhe Logic of Vonfirmation (I)', Mind, 54, pp. 1–26. [14] Hiwson, C. and Lrbaxh, P. [1993]: Scientific Rzasoning. The Baygsian Spproach, La Salle: Open Eourt. [15] Howson, C. ajd Urbach, O. [2006]: Scientific Rexsokinc. The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed. La Saole: Ppen Cojrt. [16] Huber, F. [2005a]: 'Subjeftive Probabilities as Bwsis yor Swientific Geasoning?', British Journal for tix Philosophy pf Scpence 56, pp. 101–16. [17] Huner, F. [2005b]: 'What Is the Point
Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press. [5] [1978]: Note on Conditionalization', Philosophy of Fitelson, [1999]: 'The Plurality Bayesian Measures of and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity', of Science, 66, pp. S362–78. [7] Fitelson, B. [2001]: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation PhD. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. [8] Garber, D. [1983]: 'Old Evidence and Logical in Confirmation in Earman (ed.), 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10, Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press, pp. 99–131. [9] Glymour, C. [1980]: and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton Press. [10] Good, I. J. Good The Foundations Probability its Minneapolis: University of Press. 17 [11] Hájek, A. [2012]: 'Interpretations of Probability', in E.N. Zalta (ed.), 2012, The Stanford Encyclopedia Philosophy, (Winter <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probabilityinterpret/> [12] J. 'Degree-of-Belief Degree-of-Support : Why Both Notions', Mind, 114, pp. 277-320. G. [1945]: 'Studies in the Logic of Confirmation Mind, 54, 1–26. [14] Howson, C. and Urbach, [1993]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, La Salle: Court. [15] Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [2006]: Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed. Open Court. [16] Huber, [2005a]: 'Subjective Probabilities Basis Scientific British for the of Science 56, pp. 101–16. [17] Huber, F. [2005b]: 'What Is Point
 Bayesian Confirmation TheorY, Cambridge: mIT PrEss. [5] fieLd, h. [1978]: 'A NoTe on jeffrey ConditiONaliZation', Philosophy of ScieNce, 45, pp. 361-7. [6] fiTElsoN, b. [1999]: 'THe PluRality oF baYESiaN MEaSurEs OF COnfirMatIon and tHe Problem oF MeAsUre SensitiviTY', PHilosophy oF ScIence, 66, pp. S362–78. [7] FiteLsoN, B. [2001]: StudIeS in bAyesiAn COnfirMation tHeory, PHD. DissertAtIOn, UnivERsity of wIScOnsiN-Madison. [8] Garber, D. [1983]: 'OlD evIDence and LogicaL OmnisCiENcE IN BaYesIan ConfirmAtIon ThEOry', in J. EARmAN (ED.), 1983, TeSTing ScientifiC Theories, MiNNesOta StuDiEs iN The PhiLosopHy OF ScIence 10, MinneaPoliS: UniversiTy of MiNNesota PREss, pp. 99–131. [9] GlYmour, C. [1980]: theOry And EVIdEnCe, PRiNCetON: PRinCEtoN UniversItY PRess. [10] GOod, I. j. [1983]: gOOD ThiNkiNg: ThE FounDations of ProbAbiLity ANd iTs AppLicatIons, miNneapOlis: UnIversItY of Minnesota PreSs. 17 [11] HáJek, A. [2012]: 'InterPreTaTioNs Of ProBAbilitY', in e.N. ZAlta (ed.), 2012, THe StanfORd ENcYCLOpEdia of Philosophy, (WiNtER 2012 edItion), <httP://plato.STaNfORd.edu/arcHiVes/Win2012/eNTRies/pRobaBIlItyinterPret/> [12] HaWThOrNe, J. [2005]: 'DegrEe-Of-BeliEf And degRee-of-sUppoRt : Why BAyesians need BOTh Notions', Mind, 114, pP. 277-320. [13] hempel, C. G. [1945]: 'StudiES iN THe lOgic Of COnfirmation (i)', MinD, 54, Pp. 1–26. [14] HoWson, c. AnD UrBAch, P. [1993]: SCientIfIC REAsoning. The Bayesian APpRoach, LA SallE: Open Court. [15] HowSon, C. and UrbACH, p. [2006]: ScientiFic REAsONing. The BayesiaN ApprOach, 3rd ed. La sAlle: Open court. [16] huber, F. [2005a]: 'SUbjective pRObabilitIes As BAsiS foR sCiEntific ReasonING?', BriTiSh JournAl fOr the PhIloSopHy oF ScIeNce 56, pp. 101–16. [17] HubeR, F. [2005b]: 'What IS tHe poInT
 Bayesian Confirmation The ory, Cambr idge:  MI T P re ss.[5]Field, H. [197 8 ]: ' A Note on Jeffrey Cond ition al i zati o n' , Phi losophy of S cie nc e,  45 ,p p.  361- 7.[6] Fit elson, B.[19 99 ]: 'The Plur a li ty of Baye sia n Measures o f C onfirm at ion and t heProbl em ofM easure  Sensitiv it y ', Phi l osophyo f  S cien ce, 66, pp. S362– 7 8. [7] Fitelson,B. [20 01 ] :S t udi esin Bayesia nConfi r mationT he o r y , P h D. Dissertati on, Univers i tyof Wis co nsi n -Madis on. [ 8] Gar ber, D. [19 83]:  'Old Evi dencea nd Logi c al Omni scienc e i n B ayes i an  C onf ir m ati o nThe o ry' , in J.Ea rm an (e d.), 1 9 8 3, T est ingScien tific Theorie s,Minn e sot a Stu diesin t he  Phil osophy  of S ci ence 10, Minnea poli s: Univer sit yofMi nneso t a Pres s,pp.  99–131 . [9] G l ymo ur , C .[1980]: Theory and  E v i de nce, Pri nceton :  P ri n ceton Un iv ers ityP r ess.[10] Go od, I. J . [198 3 ]:  G ood Thi nk ing: T he  Fo und ation s  ofProbab ility an d its Applications,M inneapolis: U n iv e r si t y of  Mi nnesota Pre ss.1 7 [1 1] H á je k,A . [20 12]:'I n te r pretations of Proba bi lity',  in E .N. Zalta (ed .), 2012,T h e  Stanfor d En c yc l opedia of Phil osoph y, (Winter 2012 Edi tion) , <http: //plato.s t a nford.ed u/a rch ive s/w i n 20 12/entries/pr o b abil it yinterp ret /> [12]  Ha wth orn e,J.  [2005]:'Degree- of -B el ie f a nd De g ree-of-S up por t: W hy Ba y esians  Need  Bot hNo t ion s', Min d ,1 1 4, p p.  2 77-3 20.  [ 13] H empe l , C . G. [1 945]: 'St udi e s in  t he  Logicof Confirmati on  (I)', Min d,  54 , pp.1 – 26. [14]  Howson, C. and Urbach, P. [199 3]:  Scie ntif ic Reason ing . TheBay e sian A pproac h, La  S all e :  Open C ou rt.  [ 15] Howson , C.and U rb ach,  P. [20 06]: Scientific Re a son ing. The Baye sia n Ap p r oa ch, 3r d  ed .L a S a l le: Open Court.  [16] Hube r, F.  [2005a]:' Sub je ctive P robabil ities as Basi s for Sci entific R ea soni n g ?',  British J ournal f or the Ph i losop h yof Sc ien ce 56,  p p.101–1 6. [17 ]  Hu ber,F. [20 05 b]: 'W hat I sthe Poin t
 Bayesian_Confirmation Theory,_Cambridge: MIT Press. [5]_Field, H._[1978]:_'A Note_on_Jeffrey Conditionalization', Philosophy_of Science, 45,_pp. 361-7. [6] Fitelson,_B. [1999]: 'The_Plurality_of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity', Philosophy of Science,_66,_pp. S362–78._[7]_Fitelson,_B. [2001]: Studies in Bayesian_Confirmation Theory, PhD. Dissertation, University_of Wisconsin-Madison._[8] Garber, D. [1983]: 'Old Evidence and Logical_Omniscience_in Bayesian Confirmation_Theory', in J. Earman (ed.), 1983, Testing Scientific Theories,_Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of_Science 10, Minneapolis:_University_of_Minnesota Press, pp. 99–131._[9] Glymour, C. [1980]: Theory and_Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [10]_Good, I. J. [1983]: Good Thinking: The_Foundations of Probability and its Applications,_Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press._17 [11]_Hájek, A. [2012]: 'Interpretations of_Probability', in E.N._Zalta (ed.),_2012, The Stanford_Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Winter 2012 Edition),_<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probabilityinterpret/> [12] Hawthorne,_J. [2005]: 'Degree-of-Belief and Degree-of-Support :_Why_Bayesians Need Both_Notions',_Mind,_114, pp._277-320. [13] Hempel,_C._G. [1945]:_'Studies_in the Logic of Confirmation (I)',_Mind,_54, pp. 1–26. [14] Howson, C. and_Urbach, P. [1993]: Scientific_Reasoning._The Bayesian Approach, La_Salle: Open Court. [15] Howson,_C. and Urbach, P. [2006]: Scientific_Reasoning. The_Bayesian Approach,_3rd ed. La Salle: Open Court. [16] Huber, F. [2005a]: 'Subjective_Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?',_British Journal for the_Philosophy of_Science_56, pp. 101–16._[17]_Huber, F._[2005b]: 'What Is the Point