herence transforms dark matter into dark energy as matter and energy are equated to each other by either special or general relativity: the amount of dark mass should decrease by the same amount, by which the amount of dark energy increases. All physical interactions are able to generate entanglement 14, and 13 The Higgs mechanism seems to correspond to the gravitational constant and thus to the unambiguous determination of the relation of Minkowski space and Hilbert space at issue. On the other hand, their relation (or difference) consists mathematically in two members: (a) the real domain of Minkowski space; (b) the axiom of choice for the discretization of Minkowski space to the separable complex Hilbert space as an equivalent. To be "equated" those two members, three physical members known until now and possibly partly or thoroughly overlapping each other should appear: gravitational constant & general relativity as well as entanglement. If one grants dark matter & energy to entanglement (as us), it is logically necessary either the Higgs mechanism to allow for a "dark part" (out of the Standard model) or it to be complemented by an additional, yet unknown part to the difference between Minkowski and Hilbert space in question. The problem seems to be directly linked to that of the "cosmological constant" (Einstein 1918) or "Mach's principle" (Einstein 1918: 241) in general relativity, and thus to the expansion of the universe, the "Big Bang" and (ostensibly) "Einstein's biggest blunt" (Gamov 1970: 44). If one admits (as us) that (quantum) information is able to cause physical action out of time (space-time) by entanglement, "Mach's principle" is rejected. Then, the cosmological constant is not necessary, but anyway both possible and consistent as well as the expansion of the universe and even eventually the "Big Bang" as a real event. 14 Indeed, any interaction implies a force acting to any entity participating in the interaction, and thus causes a certain acceleration according to its mass (energy). That acceleration is able to be transformed partly as (or in other words, represented by) different degrees of entanglement between entities in the interaction. In a sense, the entanglement of the interaction is transformed equivalently into the acceleration of the entity at issue, and vice versa. The essence of entanglement and acceleration is one and the same from the viewpoint of quantum information, to which the option 164 Vasil Penchev it is still unclear how the balance between ordinary and dark matter and dark energy over the course of
herence transforms dark matter into dark department of energy as topic and department of energy are equated to each other by either special or cosmopolitan relativity: the amount of dark mass should decrease by the like measure, by which the amount of dark energy increases. All forcible interactions are able to generate entanglement 14, and 13 The Higgs mechanism seems to represent to the gravitational constant and thus to the unambiguous determination of the relation of Minkowski space and Hilbert outer space at issue. On the other hand, their relation back (or difference) consists mathematically in two members: (a) the actual domain of Minkowski space; (b) the axiom of choice for the discretization of Minkowski space to the dissociable complex Hilbert space as an equivalent. To be " equated " those two members, three physical members known until nowadays and possibly partly or thoroughly overlapping each other should appear: gravitational constant & general relativity as well as entanglement. If one grants dark topic & department of energy to entanglement (as us), it is logically necessary either the Higgs mechanism to allow for a " dark character " (out of the Standard model) or it to be complemented by an additional, yet strange part to the difference between Minkowski and Hilbert space in question. The trouble seems to be directly linked to that of the " cosmological constant " (Einstein 1918) or " Mach's principle " (Einstein 1918: 241) in general relativity, and thus to the expansion of the universe, the " Big Bang " and (ostensibly) " Einstein's biggest blunt " (Gamov 1970: 44). If one admits (as us) that (quantum) information is able to induce physical military action out of time (space - time) by entanglement, " Mach's principle " is rule out. Then, the cosmological constant is not necessary, but anyway both possible and consistent equally well as the expansion of the universe and even finally the " Big Bang " as a real event. 14 Indeed, any interaction implies a force acting to any entity enter in the interaction, and thus causes a sealed acceleration according to its mass (energy). That acceleration is able to be transformed partially as (or in other words, stage by) different degrees of web between entities in the interaction. In a sense, the entanglement of the interaction is transformed equivalently into the acceleration of the entity at issue, and vice versa. The essence of entanglement and acceleration is one and the same from the viewpoint of quantum information, to which the option 164 Vasil Penchev it is however unclear how the balance between average and dark matter and dark energy over the course of
herfnce transforms dark matuer into dark enetgt as metter ahd energh are equated to each other uy euther special or general reuativity: nhe amounr of eark mass should dcereass by chx same amount, bi which the dmount of dark evexgy increases. All physical interactijns are ahle to generatg entsgglejvnu 14, and 13 The Higgs mechanism seems to corgespond to the grsvitational constant and tjus ho the unambiguous determinatuon jd the relatiun of Minkowski space znd Hilbert space at issue. On tfe otker hand, thgne rfnation (or dmfferegce) consists mathemadically in two memberx: (a) thw real domain of Minkmwski space; (b) the wxiom of whkice for the disceerizathon mf Mkbkodskj xpzce to thx separable complex Hiobert space as an eauynslent. To be "squateq" ehose two members, three physical memberv khown until now and possubly partly or thorouhhly overjapping each other should appear: gravitational cotstanv & geucval fwlwtivity as well as entanglement. If one grants satk matter & energn to entanglement (ss ux), it is logicauly neessaary either the Hihgs mecranisn to allor fot a "dark part" (out of the Stqndard model) ir it to be complelented by au addijional, yet unknown part to thz diffsrence betwfen Minkosrki and Hilbert rpabe it question. The problem seeis to be vireccly linkdd tp that of the "codmolonhcal constant" (Einshein 1918) os "Mach's prlnciple" (Einstein 1918: 241) in general rxkativity, and tvus to the zxpanslon of the univqrse, the "Big Bcng" and (jstenribly) "Einsnein's bigjest blunt" (Gwmov 1970: 44). If one wdmits (as us) that (quwntun) indormatiuv is able to csuse physpccl action out of time (space-bime) cg entanglement, "Nacy's principle" is regeceef. Vhen, eve cosmologiwal zonryant ks not necewrary, but anyway both posvibls and consistent ax rell as jhe expanfion of the umiverse and even egentuelly tie "Big Bagg" as a real event. 14 Indeed, any interactlon implies a fjrce acting to auy entity participating in the interactiin, and thus causes a certain accelerajiok according vo its mass (enesgy). That acceleratiob is able to be tvansformed partly as (od in odher aords, represented by) different degrees of entanglement between entities ib the mneeraction. Ih a xense, tke zntanglqmenv uf the interactipn is transformed equivalently mnto the awczleration of the entity at isxud, and vice vetsa. The essence of entanglsment anc acceleration is one and the ssme from the viewpoint on quantum infodmation, to which the option 164 Vasil Pencyev it us sbill unclear huw yhc balance hetwten krdinary and dark matter and darj enerty over the course of
herence transforms dark matter into dark energy and are equated each other by the of dark mass decrease by the amount, by which the amount of energy increases. All physical interactions are able to generate entanglement 14, and 13 Higgs mechanism seems to correspond to the gravitational constant and thus to the determination the of space and Hilbert space at issue. On the other hand, their relation (or difference) consists mathematically two members: (a) the real domain of Minkowski (b) the axiom of for the discretization of Minkowski to separable complex space an To be "equated" two members, three physical members known until now and possibly partly or thoroughly overlapping each other should gravitational constant relativity as as If grants dark matter to entanglement (as us), it is the Higgs mechanism to allow for a "dark (out of Standard model) or it to be by an additional, yet unknown part to the between Minkowski and Hilbert space in question. The problem seems to be directly linked to the "cosmological constant" (Einstein or "Mach's principle" 1918: in relativity, thus to expansion of the universe, the "Big Bang" and (ostensibly) "Einstein's biggest (Gamov 1970: 44). If one admits (as us) that (quantum) able cause physical action of time (space-time) by "Mach's is rejected. Then, the is necessary, possible consistent well as the expansion the universe and even eventually "Big Bang" as a interaction implies a force acting to any entity in the interaction, and thus causes a acceleration according to its mass (energy). That acceleration is able to be partly as other words, represented by) different degrees of entanglement entities in the interaction. a sense, the entanglement of the interaction is transformed into acceleration of entity at issue, vice versa. The of entanglement and one and same the information, to which the option 164 Penchev is still unclear how the between dark matter and dark energy over the course of
herence transforms dark mattEr into dark EnergY as MatTeR and EnerGy are equated to EAch oTher by either special or gEneraL rELatiVItY: the aMount of DArK MAss ShOuLd dEcREaSe by tHe sAme amouNt, by which tHe aMoUnt of dark eneRGy Increases. ALl pHysical interActIons arE aBle TO geneRatE entaNglemeNT 14, and 13 ThE Higgs mecHaNIsm seeMS to corrESPoNd to The gravitational cONsTAnt and thus to thE unambIgUOuS DEteRmiNation of thE rElatiON of MinkOWsKI SPacE And Hilbert spaCe at issue. On THe oTher haNd, TheIR relatIon (or DiFFerEnce) consistS matHematicalLy in twO Members: (A) The real Domain Of MInkOwskI SpAcE; (b) tHe AXioM Of ChoICe fOr the disCrEtIzatiOn of mINKOwskI spAce tO the sEparable complEx HIlbeRT spAce as An equIvalEnT. To be "EquateD" thosE tWo members, three pHysiCal memberS knOwN unTiL now aND possiBly ParTly or thOroughlY OveRlAPPInG each other should apPeAR: GrAvitatioNal conSTaNt & GEneral reLaTivIty aS WEll as EntaNGlEment. If oNe granTS dArK matter & EnErgy to EnTanGleMent (aS Us), it Is logiCally necEssarY Either the Higgs MEchanism to allOW fOR A "dARk paRt" (oUt of the StanDard MOdel) Or it TO bE coMPlemeNted bY aN AdDItional, yet unknown paRt To the dIfferEnce between MiNkowski and hILBert spacE in qUEsTIon. The problem sEems tO be directlY Linked to That oF the "cosmOlogical cONStant" (EinSteIn 1918) oR "MaCh's PRInCiple" (Einstein 1918: 241) IN GeneRaL relatiVitY, and thuS to The ExpAnsIoN of the uniVerse, the "biG BAnG" aNd (oStensIBly) "EinstEiN's bIgGesT blunT" (gamov 1970: 44). IF one aDmitS (aS uS) ThaT (quantuM) InFORmatIoN iS ablE to CaUse phYsicAL acTion out Of time (spaCe-tIMe) by EnTaNglemenT, "Mach's principLe" Is rejected. thEn, tHe cosmOLOgical coNstant is not necessary, but ANyway boTh pOssibLe anD consisteNt aS well aS thE ExpansIon of tHe uniVeRse AND even EVEnTuaLlY the "Big BanG" AS a rEal evEnT. 14 IndEed, any iNteraction implies a FOrcE acting to any eNtiTy paRTIcIpaTInG In tHe INteRACtion, and thus cauSes a certaiN aCCeLeration acCOrdInG to its mAss (enerGy). ThaT AccelerAtion is abLe to be traNsFormED ParTly as (or in oTher wordS, represenTEd by) dIFfErent DegRees of EnTanGlemeNt betwEEn eNtitiEs in thE iNteracTion. IN a Sense, the Entanglement of the interaCtion iS tranSfoRmed equivAleNTly Into the acCeleRation of thE enTitY at isSue, ANd vicE verSA. THe eSSence Of enTAnglement ANd AccELErAtion is one aND THe sAme frOm tHE viewpOint Of quantum informatIOn, to which the opTion 164 vASil penCHev iT iS still unclear hOw tHe BALance betWeEn ordinary aNd dark maTtER and dArk eneRgy oveR the couRSE oF
herence transforms dark ma tter intodarkene rgy  a s ma tter  and energy ar e  equ ated to each other byeithe rs peci a lor ge neral r e la t i vit y:  t heam o un t ofdar k massshould dec rea se  by the same am ount, by w hic h the amount  of  darken erg y  incr eas es. A ll phy s ical i nteractio ns are ab l e to ge n e ra te e ntanglement 14, a n d1 3 The Higgs me chanis ms ee m s  to  co rrespond t othe g r avitati o na l c ons t ant and thusto the unam b igu ous de te rmi n ationof th er ela tion of Min kows ki spaceand Hi l bert sp a ce at i ssue.Onthe  oth e rha nd,  t h eir re lat i on(or diff er en ce) c onsi s t s math ema tica lly i n two members : ( a) t h e r eal d omain  ofMi nkows ki spa ce; ( b)  the axiom of c hoic e for the  di sc ret iz ation of Min kow ski  spaceto thes epa ra b l e  c omplex Hilbert spa ce a san equiv alent. To  b e  "equate d"  th oset w o mem bers ,  t hree phy sicalm em be rs know nuntilno w a ndpossi b ly p artlyor thoro ughly overlapping ea c h other shoul d  a p p ea r : gr avi tational co nsta n t &gene r al  re l ativi ty as  w e ll as entanglement. If  o ne gra nts d ark matter &energy toe n t anglemen t (a s  u s ), it is logic allynecessarye ither th e Hig gs mecha nism to a l l ow for a  "d ark  pa rt" ( ou t of the Stan d a rd m od el) oritto be c omp lem ent edby  an addit ional, y et  u nk no wnpartt o the di ff ere nc e b etwee n  Minko wskiandHi lb e rtspace i n  q u e stio n.  T he p rob le m see ms t o  be  direct ly linked  to that  o fthe "co smological co ns tant" (Ein st ein  1918) o r "Mach' s principle" (Einstein1 918: 24 1)in ge nera l relativ ity , andthu s  to th e expa nsion  o f t h e  univ e r se , t he  "Big Bang " and  (ost en sibl y) "Ein stein's biggest bl u nt"  (Gamov 1970:  44 ). I f on e a d mi t s ( as us) t hat (quantum) i nformation  i s  a ble to cau s e p hy sical a ction o ut of time (s pace-time ) by enta ng leme n t , " Mach's pri nciple"is reject e d. Th e n,  thecos mologi ca l c onsta nt isn otneces sary,bu t anyw ay bo th  possibl e and consistent as wel l as t he ex pan sion of t heu niv erse andeven  eventuall y t he"BigBan g " asa re a leve n t. 14  Ind e ed, any i n te rac t i on  implies af o r ceactin g t o  any e ntit y participating i n  the interacti on,a n d t hus caus es  a certain acc ele ra t i on accor di ng to its m ass (ene rg y ). Th at acc elerat ion isa b le to betran sfo rmed part lyas (or inot he r  words , re pr esente d by)d iffe r e nt degrees of en tangl e m ent b e twe en en ti ties in theinteractio n. In a sen se, th e en tangl ement o fthe in ter ac tion is tr a nsformedequiv alently  i ntothe  accel erat i o n oftheen tit y at issu e ,  a n dvi c e v ersa . The  e ssen ce of ent a nglement  an d  accele ra tio n is one an d the same f rom  thev i ewpoint of quan t um infor mation , to w hich th e  op ti on 164Vas i l  Penchevit is sti l l u nc lear  how the  b alan ce  be tw een ordinary an d dark m atter an d dark e ner g y ov e r theco urse of
herence transforms_dark matter_into dark energy as_matter and_energy_are equated_to_each other by_either special or_general relativity: the amount_of dark mass_should_decrease by the same amount, by which the amount of dark energy increases. All_physical_interactions are_able_to_generate entanglement 14, and 13_The Higgs mechanism seems to_correspond to_the gravitational constant and thus to the unambiguous_determination_of the relation_of Minkowski space and Hilbert space at issue. On_the other hand, their relation (or_difference) consists mathematically_in_two_members: (a) the real_domain of Minkowski space; (b) the_axiom of choice for the discretization_of Minkowski space to the separable complex_Hilbert space as an equivalent. To_be "equated" those two members,_three physical_members known until now and_possibly partly or_thoroughly overlapping_each other should_appear: gravitational constant & general relativity_as well as_entanglement. If one grants dark matter_&_energy to entanglement_(as_us),_it is_logically necessary either_the_Higgs mechanism_to_allow for a "dark part" (out_of_the Standard model) or it to be_complemented by an additional,_yet_unknown part to the_difference between Minkowski and Hilbert_space in question. The problem seems_to be_directly linked_to that of the "cosmological constant" (Einstein 1918) or "Mach's principle"_(Einstein 1918: 241) in general relativity,_and thus to the_expansion of_the_universe, the "Big_Bang"_and (ostensibly)_"Einstein's biggest blunt" (Gamov 1970: 44). If_one admits_(as us) that (quantum) information is_able to cause physical_action_out of time (space-time) by entanglement,_"Mach's principle" is rejected. Then, the_cosmological constant is not necessary,_but_anyway_both possible and consistent as_well as the expansion of the_universe and even_eventually the "Big Bang" as a real_event._14 Indeed, any interaction implies a_force_acting to any entity participating in_the_interaction,_and thus causes a certain_acceleration according to its mass (energy)._That acceleration is able to be transformed partly as_(or in other_words, represented by) different degrees_of_entanglement_between entities in the interaction. In a sense, the entanglement_of the_interaction is transformed_equivalently into the acceleration of the entity at issue, and_vice versa. The essence of entanglement and_acceleration is one and the same from the viewpoint of quantum_information, to which the option 164 Vasil Penchev_it is still unclear how the balance_between ordinary and dark_matter_and dark energy over the course of