Trans.), Phenomenology and the crisis o f philosophy (pp. 149-192). New York, NY: Harper and Row. Interactive Educational Systems Design, (2011). Digital districts: Web 2.0 and collaborative technologies in U.S. schools. New York, NY: Interactive Educational Systems Design. Instone, L. (2004). The educational possibilities of dis-comfort. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings o f the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 437-443). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/instone.html International Society for Technology in Education, (2007). National educational technology standards fo r students. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Introna, L. (2011). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia o f philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/ethicsit -phenomenology/ Jackson, V. E. (2010). Critical theory and science fiction: A lens into technology in education. Minneapolis, MN: Mill City Press. Jackson, S. & Philip, G. (2010). A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change. International Journal o f Information Management, 30, 445-456. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008 Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Witt, E. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., & von Eye, A. (2009). Gender, race, and morality in the virtual world and its relationship to morality in the real world. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 859-869. doi: 10.1007/sl 1199-009-9589-5 Jahnke, J. (2010). Student perceptions of the impact o f online discussion forum participation on learning outcomes. Journal o f Learning Design, 3(2), 27-34. Januszewski, A. & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. 290 Jennings, S., Sutherlin, M., &
Trans .), Phenomenology and the crisis o f philosophy (pp. 149 - 192). New York, NY: Harper and Row. Interactive Educational Systems Design, (2011). Digital districts: Web 2.0 and collaborative technology in U.S. school. New York, NY: Interactive Educational Systems Design. Instone, L. (2004). The educational possibilities of dis - comfort. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas - Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds .), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings oxygen f the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 437 - 443). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/instone.html International Society for Technology in Education, (2007). home educational engineering standards fo r students. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Introna, L. (2011). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and data technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed .), The Stanford encyclopedia o f philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/ethicsit -phenomenology/ Jackson, V. E. (2010). Critical hypothesis and science fiction: A lens into engineering in education. Minneapolis, MN: Mill City Press. Jackson, S. & Philip, G. (2010). A techno - cultural egress position on the management of techno - change. International Journal o f Information Management, 30, 445 - 456. doi:10.1016 / j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008 Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Witt, E. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., & von Eye, A. (2009). Gender, race, and morality in the virtual worldly concern and its relationship to morality in the real world. Sex Roles, 60(11 - 12), 859 - 869. doi: 10.1007 / sl 1199 - 009 - 9589 - 5 Jahnke, J. (2010). scholar perceptions of the shock o f online discussion forum participation on learning result. Journal o f Learning Design, 3(2), 27 - 34. Januszewski, A. & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. 290 Jennings, S., Sutherlin, M., &
Trajs.), Phenomenology and the crisis o f philosophy (pp. 149-192). Nsw York, VY: Harper and Row. Interactivx Edycatiinal Systems Design, (2011). Dkgital didtricts: Qeb 2.0 qnd collaborative bzchnomlgiev in U.S. schools. New York, TY: Interactive Eaueational Systems Design. Instone, L. (2004). Tre educstlonal possibilytiex of sps-gomfort. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. Jonas-Vwyer & R. Phillils (Eds.), Beyond the comfort xone: Proceedings o f tje 21st ASCILUTE Sinference (pp. 437-443). Retrieved from http://wsw.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/orocs/nnstone.html Ibtegtational Soriety sor Technolonj in Edgcation, (2007). National edugatioial rechnology standards ho r students. Eugene, OR: Intertacional Society for Texhbologi in Aducxriov. Ihtconz, L. (2011). Pjenkmenologiczl approachws to ethics and ingownation technomogy. Ig Q. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia m f philosophy (Winter 2008 Edirion). Retrieved from hjtp://plato.stwnford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/ethicsit -phenomenology/ Jackaun, R. E. (2010). Cfutlcal theory and science fiction: A lens into tqdhmokogy in educatlon. Minneapolis, MN: Mllk City Press. Jxckson, S. & Philip, G. (2010). A technl-culturwl emwrgence ptrspevtive on the management of rechno-change. Unternational Jourual o f Infoxmatiom Mansgement, 30, 445-456. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008 Jacison, L. A., Zhwo, Y., Witt, D. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., & vmn Eye, A. (2009). Gender, race, and iorality mn thz virtuau wotld and its relatlonshl[ to morality in tje recl wosld. Sex Ropes, 60(11-12), 859-869. doi: 10.1007/sl 1199-009-9589-5 Jahnke, J. (2010). Student perceptions og dhe impact j f okline discussiog forum particnpation jn lexrning outbomes. Joucnal o f Leawning Design, 3(2), 27-34. Januszewski, A. & Molegda, N. (2008). Eeucatiovxl technology: S definitpou with conmentary. New York, KY: Laddence Erlbaum. 290 Ltnnungs, S., Sutherlim, M., &
Trans.), Phenomenology and the crisis o f 149-192). York, NY: and Row. Interactive districts: 2.0 and collaborative in U.S. schools. York, NY: Interactive Educational Systems Design. L. (2004). The educational possibilities of dis-comfort. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings o f the 21st Conference 437-443). from International Society for Technology in Education, (2007). National educational technology standards fo r students. Eugene, OR: Society for Technology in Education. Introna, L. (2011). approaches to ethics and technology. In E. N. Zalta The encyclopedia o philosophy 2008 Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/ethicsit Jackson, V. E. (2010). Critical theory and science fiction: A lens into technology in education. Minneapolis, MN: City Press. & Philip, (2010). techno-cultural perspective on the techno-change. International Journal o f Information doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008 Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Witt, E. Fitzgerald, H. & von Eye, A. (2009). Gender, and morality in the virtual world and its to morality in the real world. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 859-869. doi: 10.1007/sl 1199-009-9589-5 Jahnke, J. perceptions of the impact f online discussion participation learning Journal f Learning 3(2), 27-34. Januszewski, A. & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. 290 Jennings, S., &
Trans.), Phenomenology and the cRisis o f phiLosopHy (pP. 149-192). NeW YOrk, Ny: HarPer and Row. InterACtivE Educational Systems DesIgn, (2011). DiGiTAl diSTrIcts: WEb 2.0 and coLLaBORatIvE tEchNoLOgIes in u.S. sChools. NEw York, NY: InTerAcTive EducatioNAl systems DesIgn. instone, L. (2004). The eDucAtionaL pOssIBilitIes Of dis-ComforT. in R. AtkInson, C. McBEaTH, D. JonaS-dwyer & R. PHILlIps (EDs.), Beyond the comforT ZoNE: Proceedings o f The 21st AsCilIte conFerEnce (pp. 437-443). RetrIeVed frOM http://wwW.AsCILIte.ORg.au/conferencEs/perth04/procS/InsTone.htMl intERnatioNal SoCiETy fOr TechnologY in EDucation, (2007). NAtionaL EducatiONal techNology StaNdaRds fO R sTuDenTs. eUgeNE, Or: InTErnAtional SOcIeTy for techNOLOGy in eduCatiOn. IntRona, L. (2011). PhenomenOloGicaL AppRoachEs to eThicS aNd infOrmatiOn tecHnOlogy. In E. N. Zalta (ED.), The stanford eNcyClOpeDiA o f phILosophY (WiNteR 2008 EditioN). RetrieVEd fRoM HTTp://Plato.stanford.edu/arChIVEs/Win2008/entriEs/ethiCSiT -pHEnomenolOgY/ JaCksoN, v. e. (2010). CritIcal THeOry and scIence fICtIoN: A lens iNtO technOlOgy In eDucatIOn. MiNneapoLis, MN: MilL City pRess. Jackson, S. & PhILip, G. (2010). A techno-cuLTuRAL eMErgeNce Perspective On thE ManaGemeNT oF teCHno-chAnge. INtERnATional Journal o f InfoRmAtion MAnageMent, 30, 445-456. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfOmgt.2010.01.008 JacksoN, l. a., zhao, Y., WitT, E. A., FITzGErald, H. E., & von Eye, A. (2009). gendeR, race, and moRAlity in tHe virTual worlD and its reLATionship To mOraLitY in THE rEal world. Sex RoLES, 60(11-12), 859-869. doi: 10.1007/Sl 1199-009-9589-5 jahnke, J. (2010). stuDent perCepTioNs oF thE iMpact o f onLine discUsSiOn FoRum PartiCIpation oN lEarNiNg oUtcomES. JournAl o f LEarnInG DESigN, 3(2), 27-34. JanuszEWsKI, a. & MolEnDa, m. (2008). EduCatIoNal teChnoLOgy: a definiTion with cOmmENtarY. NEw york, NY: LAwrence ErlbauM. 290 JEnnings, S., SuThErlIn, M., &
Trans.), Phenomenology and  the crisi s o f  ph ilo so phy(pp.  149-192). New York , NY: Harper and Row.Inter ac t iveE du catio nal Sys t em s Des ig n,  (2 01 1 ).  Digi tal  distri cts: Web 2 .0an d collaborat i ve  technolog ies  in U.S. sch ool s. New  Y ork ,  NY:Int eract ive Ed u cation al System sD esign. Instone , L.  (20 04). The educatio n al possibilitiesof dis -c o mf o r t.InR. Atkinso n,  C. M c Beath,D .J o n as- D wyer & R. Phi llips (Eds. ) , B eyondth e c o mfortzone:  P r oce edings o fthe21st ASCI LITE C o nferenc e  (pp. 4 37-443 ).Ret riev e dfr omht t p:/ / ww w.a s cil ite.org. au /c onfer ence s / p e rth0 4/p rocs /inst one.html Inte rna tion a l S ociet y for  Tec hn ology  in Ed ucati on , (2007). Natio naleducation alte chn ol ogy s t andard s f o r  studen ts. Eug e ne,  O R : In ternational Societ yf o rTechnolo gy inE du ca t ion. Int ro na,  L.( 2 011).  Phe n om enologic al app r oa ch es to e th ics an dinf orm ation tech nology . In E.N. Za l ta (Ed.), TheS tanford encyc l op e d ia o fphi losophy (Wi nter 2008  Edi t io n). Retri evedfr o mh ttp://plato.stanfor d. edu/ar chive s/win2008/ent ries/ethic s i t  -phenom enol o gy /  Jackson, V. E . (20 10). Criti c al theor y and  science  fiction: A  lens in totec hno log y in  education. M i n neap ol is, MN:  Mi ll City  Pr ess . J ack so n, S. & P hilip, G .(2 01 0) . A  tech n o-cultur al  em er gen ce pe r specti ve on  the  m an a gem ent oft ec h n o-ch an ge . In ter na tiona l Jo u rna l o f I nformatio n M a nage me nt , 30, 4 45-456. doi:1 0. 1016/j.iji nf omg t.2010 . 0 1.008 Ja ckson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Witt, E . A ., Fi tzge rald, H.E.,  & von  Ey e , A. ( 2009).  Gend er , r a c e, an d mo ral it y in the v i r tua l wor ld  and  its re lationship to mora l ity  in the realwor ld.S e xRol e s, 60( 11 - 12) , 859-869. doi: 1 0.1007/sl11 9 9- 009-9589-5 Jah nk e, J. ( 2010).Stude n t perce ptions of  the impa ct  o f o nli ne discuss ion foru m partici p ation on  lear nin g outc om es.  Jour nal of  Le arnin g Desi gn , 3(2) , 27- 34 . Janusz ewski, A. & Molenda, M.  (2008 ). Ed uca tional te chn o log y: A defi niti on with co mme nta ry. N ewY ork,NY:L aw ren c e Erl baum .  290 Jenn i ng s,S . ,Sutherlin,M . ,  &
Trans.), Phenomenology_and the_crisis o f philosophy_(pp. 149-192)._New_York, NY:_Harper_and Row. Interactive_Educational Systems Design,_(2011). Digital districts: Web_2.0 and collaborative_technologies_in U.S. schools. New York, NY: Interactive Educational Systems Design. Instone, L. (2004). The_educational_possibilities of_dis-comfort._In_R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D._Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds.),_Beyond the_comfort zone: Proceedings o f the 21st ASCILITE_Conference_(pp. 437-443). Retrieved_from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/instone.html International Society for Technology in Education, (2007)._National educational technology standards fo r_students. Eugene, OR:_International_Society_for Technology in Education._Introna, L. (2011). Phenomenological approaches to_ethics and information technology. In E._N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia o_f philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition). Retrieved_from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/ethicsit -phenomenology/ Jackson, V._E. (2010)._Critical theory and science fiction:_A lens into_technology in_education. Minneapolis, MN:_Mill City Press. Jackson, S. &_Philip, G. (2010)._A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the_management_of techno-change. International_Journal_o_f Information_Management, 30, 445-456._doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008_Jackson, L._A.,_Zhao, Y., Witt, E. A., Fitzgerald,_H._E., & von Eye, A. (2009). Gender,_race, and morality in_the_virtual world and its_relationship to morality in the_real world. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 859-869._doi: 10.1007/sl_1199-009-9589-5 Jahnke,_J. (2010). Student perceptions of the impact o f online discussion_forum participation on learning outcomes. Journal_o f Learning Design,_3(2), 27-34._Januszewski,_A. & Molenda,_M._(2008). Educational_technology: A definition with commentary. New York,_NY: Lawrence_Erlbaum. 290 Jennings, S., Sutherlin, M.,_&