 condition in China. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 22, 100-115. doi: 10.1007/sl2130-0099074 -z Zucker, A. A. (2009). Transforming schools with technology. Independent School, 68(2), 22-30. 301 Appendixes Appendix A: Interview Questions and Protocol Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership: Questioning Technological Determinism Date:___________________________________ Participant Name:______________________________________________ School or district:______________________________________________ Job Title:______________________________________________ Interviewer Name:_____________________________________________ Introductory Protocol To assist with my data collection and interview note taking, I would like to audio record your interview. I am the only person who will listen to the recording, and the audio file will be kept safeguarded on a password protected device. After completing my note taking and data analysis the recording will be deleted. You had previously signed a release form that meets the human subject requirements for Northcentral University. There is no intent to inflict harm, and the research does not involve more than minimal risk to participants. In reporting the results of my study, no personally identifiable data such as name, school, or district will be reported that might connect the data to a participant. Your participation in this study is voluntary and you can opt to withdraw from the study at any time. You may choose not to answer any question during the interview. 302 My dissertation research focuses on examining philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership, and how these assumptions influence decision making and leadership. Participants for this study include educational technology leaders such as yourself from Virginia school districts, including technology directors and instructional technology specialists. The interview will include a series of open-ended questions, and the interview is expected to take approximately 30 minutes. Thank you for agreeing to participate in this research study. Interview Questions 1. Ice-breaker question: How would you describe your philosophy of technology? 2. (follow-up probing question) Does what you describe as your philosophy of technology have implications for your work as an educational technology leader? 3. When you think back to your leadership decisions about educational technology, what informed your thinking or influenced your decisions? 4. Do you have any thoughts on the idea that technological change is inevitable, and that schools should not resist such change? 5. What do you think, does technology cause social change, or do social factors shape technology? Please explain. 6. What do you think is the connection between technology and values? Does technology raise questions relating to values or ethical
condition in China. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 22, 100 - 115. doi: 10.1007 / sl2130 - 0099074 -z Zucker, A. A. (2009). Transforming schools with technology. Independent School, 68(2), 22 - 30. 301 Appendixes Appendix A: Interview Questions and Protocol Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership: question Technological Determinism Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Participant Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ School or district: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Job Title: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Interviewer Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Introductory Protocol To help with my data collection and interview eminence taking, I would like to audio criminal record your consultation. I am the only person who will listen to the recording, and the audio file will be kept safeguarded on a password protected device. After complete my note taking and datum analysis the recording will be deleted. You had previously signed a release form that meets the human subject requirement for Northcentral University. There is no intent to inflict harm, and the inquiry does not involve more than minimal risk to participant. In reporting the consequence of my study, no personally identifiable data such as name, school, or district will be reported that might connect the data to a player. Your participation in this study is voluntary and you can opt to withdraw from the study at any time. You may choose not to suffice any doubt during the interview. 302 My dissertation research focuses on examining philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership, and how these assumptions determine decision making and leadership. player for this discipline include educational technology leaders such as yourself from Virginia school district, including engineering directors and instructional technology specialists. The consultation will include a series of open - ended questions, and the interview is have a bun in the oven to take approximately 30 minutes. Thank you for agreeing to participate in this inquiry study. Interview doubt 1. internal-combustion engine - breaker question: How would you describe your philosophy of engineering? 2. (follow - up probing question) Does what you describe as your philosophy of technology have implications for your work as an educational engineering leader? 3. When you think back to your leadership decisions about educational technology, what informed your thinking or influence your decisions? 4. Do you suffer any thoughts on the mind that technological variety is inevitable, and that schools should not resist such change? 5. What do you intend, does technology induce social change, or do social factors shape engineering? Please explain. 6. What do you think is the connection between technology and value? Does technology raise questions associate to values or ethical
 cojdition in China. Knowledne, Technology & Policy, 22, 100-115. doi: 10.1007/sm2130-0099074 -z Zuckdr, A. A. (2009). Transforming schools wuth ttbhnology. Independent Rchool, 68(2), 22-30. 301 Appendizes Eppendix A: Intertjew Questions wnd 'ritocol Philosokhy of Technmlogy Assumptimnr nn Educational Technology Leadership: Questipnlng Technologisal Cqterjpnlsm Date:___________________________________ Participant Name:______________________________________________ School or disurict:______________________________________________ Job Title:______________________________________________ Inyerviewer Name:_____________________________________________ Introductorj Prltocol To assist wlth my data coljwction and ivterview note taking, I would like to audio record youf intzrview. I am tye ltly person xho wijl listen to the recmrding, snd the audio nile xill be kept safeguarded mn a password protgcted deviwe. After completing mt notg takhng xbd aatz enamysis hhe recording will be deoeted. You had previpufoy signed a rslease fjrm that meets the human subject requirtmenta for Northcentral Univwrsity. There is no injent to inslict harm, and the research does not involve more than oinnnal rkwk to participants. In reporting the results of ig xtldy, no personally identifiabke dsja such as namg, school, od district will be reportgd thar might cjnnevt the data to a participanr. Your partibiparion in this study is voluntaxy and you van opt to withdraw froo ths study at wny time. Guu may choose nog tp dnswer any question during the intecview. 302 My dirserjation wesearch flcuses on examining phillsophi of tachnology wssumptions in educational techiplogy leaderxhhp, dnd how chese sssumptions igfluence decisnon makiug and leadershii. Partici'ants for thys study inclgfe educationel technojogy leaeers suzf as yourself grom Virgpnna school districts, includikg tezgnology directoxr and instructiomal teshjokodf specialistv. Thd ivyervidw will incojde s series of open-endeg qusstions, and the inyevview is gxpected eo take approcimately 30 minutes. Uhank bou foc agrerind to participate in this reseadch study. Inberview Questyons 1. Ice-breaker question: How would you describe your piilosophy of technologi? 2. (follow-up probing qoesuion) Does whav you qescribe ds your philosophy od technology have implications for youd work as aj educational technology leader? 3. When you think back to your leadership dwcisiois about educztiomal tvchuolpgy, whwt iifurmed your thinkpng or influenced your decisions? 4. Do you hcve any thoughts on the idea yhxt technologizal change is inevitable, and thay schools should not resist sucn change? 5. What do you thlnk, does rechnklogy bzure social change, ot do smcial factorw shwpe technologh? Pkewse explaln. 6. Xhac do you think is the connection vetweeb hechnology and velues? Does tccmnologi raise zuestions relatihg tk valugs or ethical
condition in China. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, doi: -z Zucker, A. (2009). Transforming 68(2), 301 Appendixes Appendix Interview Questions and Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Leadership: Questioning Technological Determinism Date:___________________________________ Participant Name:______________________________________________ School or district:______________________________________________ Job Title:______________________________________________ Interviewer Introductory Protocol To assist with my data collection and interview note taking, I like audio your I am the only person who will listen to the recording, and the audio file will kept safeguarded on a password protected device. After my note taking and analysis the recording will be You previously signed release that the human subject for Northcentral University. There is no intent to inflict harm, and the research does not involve more minimal risk In reporting results my no personally identifiable as name, school, or district will might connect the data to a participant. Your in this is voluntary and you can opt withdraw from the study at any time. You choose not to answer any question during the interview. 302 My dissertation research focuses on of technology assumptions in technology leadership, and these influence making leadership. Participants this study include educational technology leaders such as yourself from Virginia districts, including technology directors and instructional technology specialists. The interview a of open-ended questions, the interview is expected take 30 minutes. Thank you to in Interview 1. question: How would you your philosophy of technology? 2. probing question) Does what of technology have implications for your work as educational technology leader? 3. When you think to your leadership decisions about educational technology, what informed your thinking or your decisions? you have any thoughts on the idea that change is inevitable, and schools should not resist such change? 5. What do think, technology cause change, or do factors shape technology? explain. 6. What think is connection technology technology raise questions relating to values ethical
 condition in China. Knowledge, technology & policY, 22, 100-115. doI: 10.1007/sl2130-0099074 -Z ZUckeR, A. A. (2009). TRansforming schOOls wIth technology. IndependeNt SchOoL, 68(2), 22-30. 301 appeNDiXes ApPendix A: iNtERVieW QUeStiOnS AnD ProtOcoL PhilosOphy of TechNolOgY Assumptions IN EDucational tecHnology LeadeRshIp: QuesTiOniNG TechNolOgicaL DeterMInism DAte:___________________________________ ParticIpANt Name:______________________________________________ sChool or DIStRict:______________________________________________ job Title:______________________________________________ InterviewER NAMe:_____________________________________________ Introductory protocOl tO aSSIst WitH my data colLeCtion ANd interVIeW NOTe tAKing, I would likE to audio recORd yOur intErVieW. i am the Only pErSOn wHo will listeN to tHe recordiNg, and tHE audio fILe will bE kept sAfeGuaRded ON a PaSswOrD ProTEcTed DEviCe. After cOmPlEting My noTE TAKing And Data AnalySis the recordiNg wIll bE DelEted. YOu had PrevIoUsly sIgned a ReleaSe Form that meets thE humAn subject ReqUiRemEnTs for nOrthceNtrAl UNiversiTy. There IS no InTENT tO inflict harm, and the ReSEArCh does noT involVE mOrE Than miniMaL riSk to PARticiPantS. in ReportinG the reSUlTs Of my stuDy, No persOnAllY idEntifIAble Data suCh as name, SchooL, Or district will BE reported that MIgHT CoNNect The Data to a partIcipANt. YoUr paRTiCipATion iN this StUDy IS voluntary and you can OpT to witHdraw From the study aT any time. YoU MAY choose nOt to ANsWEr any question dUring The interviEW. 302 My disseRtatiOn researCh focuses ON ExamininG phIloSopHy oF TEcHnology assumpTIOns iN eDucatioNal TechnolOgy LeaDerShiP, aNd how thesE assumptIoNs InFlUenCe decISion makiNg And LeAdeRship. pArticiPants For tHiS sTUdy Include EDuCATionAl TeChnoLogY lEaderS sucH As yOurself From VirgiNia SChooL dIsTricts, iNcluding technOlOgy directoRs And InstruCTIonal tecHnology specialists. The inTErview wIll IncluDe a sEries of opEn-eNded quEstIOns, and The intErvieW iS exPECted tO TAkE apPrOximately 30 mINUteS. ThanK yOu foR agreeiNg to participate in tHIs rEsearch study. INteRvieW qUeStiONs 1. iCe-bReAKer QUEstion: How would yOu describe YoUR pHilosophy oF TecHnOlogy? 2. (foLlow-up pRobinG QuestioN) Does what You descriBe As yoUR PhiLosophy of tEchnologY have implICatioNS fOr youR woRk as an EdUcaTionaL technOLogY leadEr? 3. When YoU think Back tO yOur leadeRship decisions about educAtionaL techNolOgy, what inForMEd yOur thinkiNg or Influenced YouR deCisioNs? 4. DO You haVe anY ThOugHTs on tHe idEA that techNOlOgiCAL cHange is inevITABle, And thAt sCHools sHoulD not resist such chaNGe? 5. What do you thiNk, doES TecHnoLOgy cAuSe social change, Or dO sOCIal factoRs Shape technoLogy? PleaSe EXplaiN. 6. What dO you thInk is thE COnNEction BetwEen TechnologY anD vALues? DoeS tEcHNology RaisE qUestioNs relaTIng tO VAlues or ethical
 condition in China. Knowl edge, Tech nolog y &  Po li cy,22,100-115. doi:1 0.10 07/sl2130-0099074 -z Z ucker ,A . A. (2 009).  Transf o rm i n g s ch oo lswi t htechn olo gy. Ind ependent S cho ol , 68(2), 22- 3 0.  301 Appen dix es AppendixA:Interv ie w Q u estio nsand P rotoco l  Philo sophy ofTe c hnolog y  Assump t i on s in  Educational Tech n ol o gy Leadership:  Quest io n in g Tec hno logical De te rmini s m Date: _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _____________ ___________ _  Pa rticip an t N a me:___ _____ __ _ ___ ___________ ____ _________ ______ _ _ Schoo l  or dis trict: ___ ___ ____ _ __ __ ___ __ _ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ ________ __ __  JobTitl e : _ _ ____ ___ ____ _____ _____________ ___ ____ _ ___ ____Inter view er  Name :_____ _____ __ _______________ ____ _________ ___ __  In tr oduct o ry Pro toc olTo assi st with myda t a co llection and inter vi e w  n ote taki ng, Iw ou ld like toau dio  rec o r d you r in t er view. Iam the on ly  person  w ho wil llis ten  to t h e re cordin g, and t he au d io file will b e  kept safegua r de d on a pa ssw ord protect ed d e vice . Af t er  co m pleti ng my  n o te taking and data ana ly sis th e rec ording will b e deleted. Y o u had pr evio u sl y  signed a rele ase f orm that m e ets thehuman  subject  requirem e n ts for N ort hce ntr alU n iv ersity. There i s no  i ntent t o i nflicthar m,and  th eresearchdoes not  i nv ol ve  mo re th a n minima lris ktoparti c ipants . Inrepo rt in g  th e resul t so f  myst ud y, n o p er sonal ly i d ent ifiable  data suc h a s  nam e,  s chool,or district w il l be repor te d t hat mi g h t connec t the data to a partici p ant. Yo urparti cipa tion in t his  study  is volunt ary an d you  c ano p t tow i th dra wfrom the s t u dyat an ytime . You m ay choose not to a n swe r any questio n d urin g th e i n te r vie w. 302 M y dissertationresearch f oc u se s on exami n ing  p hilosop hy of t echno l ogy ass umptionsin educat io nalt e chn ology lead ership,and how t h ese a s su mptio nsinflue nc e d ecisi on mak i ngand l eaders hi p. Par ticip an ts for t his study include educa tional  tech nol ogy leade rss uch  as yours elffrom Virgi nia  sc hooldis t ricts , in c lu din g  tech nolo g y directo r sand i ns tructionalt e c hno logyspe c ialist s. T he interview will include a seri es o f ope n-e n dedqu estions, and t hein t e rview is  e xpected totake app ro x imate ly 30minute s. Than k yo u  for a gree ing  to parti cip at e  in thi sre s earchstud y.  Inter view Q u esti o n s 1. Ice-breaker  ques t i on: H o w w ouldyo u descr i be y our philos ophy of tec hnolog y? 2 . (fo llow-up  p robing  qu es tion) Does what youdescr ibe asyo ur p hil osophy  oft e chnol ogyha veimplicati o n sf or  y o urwork  as a neduc ational t e chnology  le a der? 3.  W hen y ou thi n kb a ck to your  le aders h i p decision s  abo u te ducat ionaltechno logy, w h atin formedyou r thinkingor influe n ced  y ourdecision s?  4.Do  yo uhave any though ts on th e idea t h a t tech nol o gica l  chang eis inevitabl e, an dt hat sch o o lsshouldn otres ist  suc h c hang e ? 5. What do you think,does  tech n olo gy ca use s oc ial chan g e, o r do soc i al factors sh ape technology? Ple a se e xpl a in .6. What d o y o u thi nk i s t he c onn ecti o n  bet w eent ec hnol ogy an d va lu es ? Does te ch nologyr aise que stio ns re la ti n gto valu es or et hical 
 condition_in China._Knowledge, Technology & Policy,_22, 100-115._doi:_10.1007/sl2130-0099074 -z_Zucker,_A. A. (2009)._Transforming schools with_technology. Independent School, 68(2),_22-30. 301 Appendixes_Appendix_A: Interview Questions and Protocol Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership: Questioning_Technological_Determinism Date:____________________________________Participant_Name:_______________________________________________School or district:______________________________________________ Job Title:_______________________________________________Interviewer Name:_____________________________________________ Introductory Protocol To_assist with_my data collection and interview note taking, I_would_like to audio_record your interview. I am the only person who_will listen to the recording, and_the audio file_will_be_kept safeguarded on a_password protected device. After completing my_note taking and data analysis the_recording will be deleted. You had previously_signed a release form that meets_the human subject requirements for_Northcentral University._There is no intent to_inflict harm, and_the research_does not involve_more than minimal risk to participants._In reporting the_results of my study, no personally_identifiable_data such as_name,_school,_or district_will be reported_that_might connect_the_data to a participant. Your participation_in_this study is voluntary and you can_opt to withdraw from_the_study at any time._You may choose not to_answer any question during the interview._302 My_dissertation research_focuses on examining philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership,_and how these assumptions influence decision_making and leadership. Participants_for this_study_include educational technology_leaders_such as_yourself from Virginia school districts, including technology_directors and_instructional technology specialists. The interview will_include a series of_open-ended_questions, and the interview is expected_to take approximately 30 minutes. Thank_you for agreeing to participate_in_this_research study. Interview Questions 1._Ice-breaker question: How would you describe_your philosophy of_technology? 2. (follow-up probing question) Does what_you_describe as your philosophy of technology_have_implications for your work as an_educational_technology_leader? 3. When you think_back to your leadership decisions about_educational technology, what informed your thinking or influenced your_decisions? 4. Do_you have any thoughts on_the_idea_that technological change is inevitable, and that schools should not_resist such_change? 5. What_do you think, does technology cause social change, or do_social factors shape technology? Please explain. 6._What do you think is the connection between technology and values?_Does technology raise questions relating to values or_ethical