. Retrieved from http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/papers/chi2011-thenewgood.pdf 286 Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory o f technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Feenberg, A. (2010). Democratic rationalization: Technology, power, and freedom. In D. M. Kaplan (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o f technology (pp. 139-155). Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. Fernando, M., Beale, F., Geroy, G. D. (2009). The spiritual dimension in leadership at Dilmah Tea. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(6), 522-539. Fidalgo, A. (2009). Heidegger's cell phone ubiquitous communication and existential distance. MATRIZes, 5(1), 1-20. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6-25. Fisher, T. (2006). Educational transformation: Is it, like 'beauty', in the eye of the beholder, or will we know it when we see it? Education and Information Technologies, 11, 293-303. doi: 10.1007/s 10639-006-9009-1 Flyverbom, M. (2005). Beyond the black box. Social Epistemology, 19(2/3), 225-229. doi: 10.1080/02691720500145423 Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2009). Philosophy of technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia o f philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/technology/ Friedman, T. (2009). Tweeting the dialectic of technological determinism. FLOW, 10(2). Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths o f e-leaming. Ubiquity, 2008(6). doi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frith, J., Morain, M., Cummings, C., & Berube, D. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. You are not a gadget: A manifesto. Journal o f Communication, 61
. Retrieved from http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/papers/chi2011-thenewgood.pdf 286 Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory o f technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Feenberg, A. (2010). Democratic systematization: engineering, world power, and freedom. In D. M. Kaplan (Ed .), Readings in the doctrine o f technology (pp. 139 - 155). Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. Fernando, M., Beale, F., Geroy, G. D. (2009). The spiritual property in leadership at Dilmah Tea. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(6), 522 - 539. Fidalgo, A. (2009). Heidegger's cell phone omnipresent communication and experiential distance. MATRIZes, 5(1), 1 - 20. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research method acting. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6 - 25. Fisher, T. (2006). Educational transformation: Is it, like' beauty', in the eye of the beholder, or will we acknowledge it when we see it? Education and Information Technologies, 11, 293 - 303. doi: 10.1007 / s 10639 - 006 - 9009 - 1 Flyverbom, M. (2005). Beyond the black box. Social Epistemology, 19(2/3), 225 - 229. doi: 10.1080/02691720500145423 Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2009). Philosophy of engineering. In E. N. Zalta (Ed .), The Stanford encyclopedia o f philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/technology/ Friedman, T. (2009). pinch the dialectic of technological determinism. FLOW, 10(2). Friesen, N. (2008). Critical hypothesis: Ideology criticism and the myths o f einsteinium - leaming. Ubiquity, 2008(6). doi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frith, J., Morain, M., Cummings, C., & Berube, D. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. You are not a appliance: A manifesto. Journal o f Communication, 61
. Rehrieved from http://daniel.fxllman.org/resourews/papecs/chi2011-thsnewgood.odf 286 Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical thxory o f uvchnology. New York, NY: Oxford Ujiversitt Prtss. Feenberg, A. (2010). Dxjocratig ratjlnalnzetion: Technologi, power, and xreedom. In D. M. Kxppan (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o f techmopogy (pp. 139-155). Plymooth, UL: Rowjan and Littlefield. Fernando, M., Beame, F., Gegoy, G. D. (2009). The spirotual dimension in leadersjip wt Dilmah Tea. Leadfrship & Orgqnizwrion Developoent Journal, 30(6), 522-539. Fidalgo, A. (2009). Heidegger's cell phone ubiquktous communicajnin wtd existentmal diftance. MATRIDvs, 5(1), 1-20. Fitlay, L. (2009). Debating phenpmeiolotical research methodv. Phenomenology & Ptactice, 3(1), 6-25. Xiaher, T. (2006). Educationql tranvforkatiub: Ir iu, lmke 'beautj', ii the eye or the beholeer, or will we know ie when we see jt? Edusaeion and Information Technologies, 11, 293-303. doi: 10.1007/s 10639-006-9009-1 Flyverbom, M. (2005). Beyond thw black box. Social Eplstemologr, 19(2/3), 225-229. doi: 10.1080/02691720500145423 Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2009). Phhloso'hh oy techvillgy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia k g ihilosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). Rrtgirded from http://klato.stchfkrd.edu/archives/spr2010/ejtries/tgchnoligy/ Friedian, Y. (2009). Tweeting the dialectic od technologibal eeterminism. FLOW, 10(2). Yriesen, N. (2008). Cxiticak thepry: Ideology critique aud the myths o f f-leaming. Hciquity, 2008(6). doi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frkth, J., Morain, M., Cummings, C., & Berufe, D. (2011). The shaklows: Wfat jhe Intqrnet is dling bm our brains. You age noj a gagget: A manlfesto. Journal o f Communicatioi, 61
. Retrieved from http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/papers/chi2011-thenewgood.pdf 286 Feenberg, A. theory f technology. York, NY: Oxford Democratic Technology, power, and In D. M. (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o technology (pp. 139-155). Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. Fernando, M., Beale, F., Geroy, D. (2009). The spiritual dimension in leadership at Dilmah Tea. Leadership & Organization Journal, 522-539. A. Heidegger's cell phone ubiquitous communication and existential distance. MATRIZes, 5(1), 1-20. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6-25. Fisher, T. Educational transformation: Is it, 'beauty', in the eye of beholder, will we it we it? Education and Technologies, 11, 293-303. doi: 10.1007/s 10639-006-9009-1 Flyverbom, M. (2005). Beyond the black box. Social Epistemology, 19(2/3), 225-229. 10.1080/02691720500145423 Franssen, G., & de I. Philosophy of technology. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia (Spring 2010 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/technology/ Friedman, T. Tweeting the of technological determinism. FLOW, 10(2). Friesen, (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths f e-leaming. Ubiquity, 2008(6). doi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frith, J., Morain, M., Cummings, C., & Berube, D. shallows: What the Internet doing to our You not gadget: manifesto. Journal f Communication, 61
. Retrieved from http://daniel.faLlman.org/reSourcEs/pApeRs/Chi2011-tHeneWgood.pdf 286 FeenbeRG, A. (1991). CrItical theory o f technoloGy. New yoRK, NY: OXFoRd UniVersity pReSS. feeNbErG, A. (2010). DEmOCrAtic rAtiOnalizaTion: TechnoLogY, pOwer, and freedOM. IN D. M. Kaplan (ED.), ReAdings in the pHilOsophy O f TecHNologY (pp. 139-155). plymoUth, UK: ROWman anD LittlefiElD. fernanDO, M., Beale, f., gErOy, G. D. (2009). the spiritual dimenSIoN In leadership at dilmah teA. leADErsHip & organizatiOn develOPment JoURnAL, 30(6), 522-539. fIdaLGo, A. (2009). Heidegger's Cell phone ubIQuiTous coMmUniCAtion aNd exiStENtiAl distance. MaTRIzes, 5(1), 1-20. Finlay, l. (2009). DebatINg phenoMEnologiCal resEarCh mEthoDS. PHeNomEnOLogY & prActICe, 3(1), 6-25. FIsher, T. (2006). EdUcAtIonal TranSFORMatiOn: IS it, lIke 'beAuty', in the eye oF thE behOLdeR, or wiLl we kNow iT wHen we See it? EDucatIoN and Information techNologies, 11, 293-303. dOi: 10.1007/s 10639-006-9009-1 flYveRbOm, M. (2005). BeYOnd the BlaCk bOx. SociaL EpisteMOloGy, 19(2/3), 225-229. DOI: 10.1080/02691720500145423 frAnssen, M., Lokhorst, G., & vaN dE pOeL, I. (2009). PhilosOphy of TEcHnOLogy. In E. N. zaLta (ed.), ThE sTanfoRd enCYcLopedia o F philoSOpHy (spring 2010 EDiTion). ReTrIevEd fRom htTP://plaTo.stanFord.edu/aRchivES/spr2010/entries/tecHNology/ FriedmaN, t. (2009). TWEEtINg thE diAlectic of teChnoLOgicAl deTErMinISm. FLOw, 10(2). FrieSeN, n. (2008). CRItical theory: IdeologY cRitiquE and tHe myths o f e-leaMing. UbiquiTY, 2008(6). DOi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frith, J., moraIN, M., cUmmings, C., & Berube, d. (2011). The sHallows: WhaT The InterNet is Doing to oUr brains. YOU Are not a gAdgEt: A ManIfeSTO. JOurnal o f CommuNICatiOn, 61
. Retrieved from http://da niel.fallm an.or g/r eso ur ces/ pape rs/chi2011-the n ewgo od.pdf 286 Feenberg, A . (19 91 ) . Cr i ti cal t heory o ft e chn ol og y.Ne w  Y ork,NY:  Oxford  Universit y P re ss. Feenberg ,  A . (2010).Dem ocratic rati ona lizati on : T e chnol ogy , pow er, an d  freed om. In D.  M .  Kapla n  (Ed.), R ea ding s in the philosop h yo  f technology(pp. 1 39 - 15 5 ) . P lym outh, UK:Ro wmana nd Litt l ef i e l d.F ernando, M.,Beale, F.,G ero y, G.D.  (2 0 09). T he sp ir i tua l dimension  inleadershi p at D i lmah Te a . Leade rship& O rga niza t io nDev el o pme n tJou r nal , 30(6),  5 22 -539.  Fid a l g o , A.  (2 009) . Hei degger's cell  ph oneu biq uitou s com muni ca tionand ex isten ti al distance. MA TRIZ es, 5(1),  1- 20 . F in lay,L . (200 9).  De batingphenome n olo gi c a l  r esearch methods. P he n o me nology &  Pract i ce ,3 (1), 6-2 5.  Fi sher , T. (2 006) .  E ducation al tra n sf or mation:  I s it,li ke'be auty' ,  inthe ey e of the  beho l der, or will w e  know it when we s ee it?Edu cation andInfo r mati on T e ch nol o gies,  11,29 3 -3 0 3. doi: 10.1007/s 1 06 39-006 -9009 -1 Flyverbom,  M. (2005) . B eyond th e bl a ck box. Social Ep istem ology, 19( 2 /3), 225 -229.  doi: 10 .1080/026 9 1 72050014 542 3 F ran sse n ,  M ., Lokhorst,G . , &va n de Po el,  I. (20 09) . P hil oso ph y of tech nology.In  E .N.  Za lta ( E d.), The  S tan fo rdencyc l opedia  o fphil os op h y ( Spring2 01 0 Edit io n) . Re tri ev ed fr om h t tp: //plato .stanford .ed u /arc hi ve s/spr20 10/entries/te ch nology/ Fr ie dma n, T.( 2 009). Tw eeting the dialectic of technol ogi cal d eter minism. F LOW , 10(2 ).F riesen , N. ( 2008) .Cri t i cal t h e or y:Id eology cri t i que  andth e my ths o f  e-leaming. Ubiqui t y,2008(6). doi:  10 .114 5 / 13 868 5 8. 1 386 86 0  Fr i t h, J., Morain,M., Cummin gs ,  C ., & Berub e , D .(2011).  The sh allow s : Whatthe Inter net is do in g to o urbrains. Yo u are no t a gadge t : A m a ni festo . J ournal  o  fCommu nicati o n,61
. Retrieved_from http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/papers/chi2011-thenewgood.pdf_286 Feenberg, A. (1991)._Critical theory_o_f technology._New_York, NY: Oxford_University Press. Feenberg,_A. (2010). Democratic rationalization:_Technology, power, and_freedom._In D. M. Kaplan (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o f technology (pp. 139-155)._Plymouth,_UK: Rowman_and_Littlefield._Fernando, M., Beale, F., Geroy,_G. D. (2009). The spiritual_dimension in_leadership at Dilmah Tea. Leadership & Organization Development_Journal,_30(6), 522-539. Fidalgo,_A. (2009). Heidegger's cell phone ubiquitous communication and existential_distance. MATRIZes, 5(1), 1-20. Finlay, L._(2009). Debating phenomenological_research_methods._Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1),_6-25. Fisher, T. (2006). Educational transformation:_Is it, like 'beauty', in the_eye of the beholder, or will we_know it when we see it?_Education and Information Technologies, 11,_293-303. doi:_10.1007/s 10639-006-9009-1 Flyverbom, M. (2005)._Beyond the black_box. Social_Epistemology, 19(2/3), 225-229._doi: 10.1080/02691720500145423 Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G.,_& van de_Poel, I. (2009). Philosophy of technology._In_E. N. Zalta_(Ed.),_The_Stanford encyclopedia_o f philosophy_(Spring_2010 Edition)._Retrieved_from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/technology/ Friedman, T. (2009). Tweeting_the_dialectic of technological determinism. FLOW, 10(2). Friesen,_N. (2008). Critical theory:_Ideology_critique and the myths_o f e-leaming. Ubiquity, 2008(6)._doi: 10.1145/1386858.1386860 Frith, J., Morain, M.,_Cummings, C.,_& Berube,_D. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our_brains. You are not a gadget:_A manifesto. Journal o_f Communication,_61