 came from the sexual revolution, the desire for children cannot be suppressed in the longterm. And the alternative, to prove autonomy as a single mother, was also not ideal. The burdens of the fatherless child are too heavy, especially for the children of divorced parents. The way is again free for the return to the pair with children, where man and woman mutually realize their desire for a child. The common decision for a child is emotional and an enormous gain for both. The emancipated woman can connect sexuality and pregnancy and experience eroticism, and the man profits from this expansion of Eros, far beyond the act of conception. The father experiences the phases of the pregnancy and birth as part of himself and is now free to express his caring emotions, previously only entitled to the mother. This continues in the common raising of the child; the ideal of a generative sexuality between the parents appears to become a reality. What could be a more creative way of life than being in a loving pair with equal partners and experiencing a close connection with your children, in which everyone‟s needs are fulfilled? Obviously, the New Pair, as every other form of life, also has its dangers, and they should not be concealed. The intense emotionality, which also involves the children, can lead to the elimination of two important differences: the difference between man and woman and the difference 4 between parents and children. Empathy and mutual understanding strongly bind those involved together, but differences also have a social function that is all too often underestimated. As the polarity of the gender brings together the parents, the parental authority marks the limits which are necessary for the development of the child. It is thus detrimental for both sides if parents discuss their emotional needs too intimately with the children. A type of teddy-bear love emerges that leads to the adult‟s infantillization and the self over-estimation of the child. To avoid this, differences must be maintained and enacted. Without differences no society can develop the social dynamic needed in order to deal with the challenges of the times. Here, philosophical anthropology should remember that the modern denial of differences in nature robs humans of the very foundations of humanity. References Fellmann, Ferdinand. Das Paar. Eine erotische Rechtfertigung des Menschen. Berlin, 2005 (English Translation in progress) Fellmann, Ferdinand. "The Origin of Man Behind The Veil of Ignorance." Forthcoming in Biological Theory, The MIT Press 5:3, UN NUEVO
came from the sexual revolution, the desire for children cannot be inhibit in the longterm. And the option, to prove autonomy as a single mother, was besides not ideal. The burdens of the fatherless child are besides heavy, especially for the child of divorced parents. The manner is again free for the return to the couple with children, where man and woman mutually realize their desire for a child. The coarse decision for a child is emotional and an enormous gain for both. The emancipated woman can connect sex and pregnancy and experience eroticism, and the man profits from this expansion of Eros, far beyond the act of creation. The father experiences the phase of the pregnancy and birth as region of himself and is now free to express his caring emotions, previously merely entitled to the mother. This continues in the common raising of the child; the ideal of a generative sexuality between the parents appears to become a reality. What could be a more creative way of life than being in a loving pair with equal partners and experiencing a close connection with your child, in which everyone‟s needs are fulfilled? Obviously, the New Pair, as every early human body of life sentence, also has its danger, and they should not be concealed. The intense emotionality, which also involves the child, can lead to the elimination of two important differences: the difference between man and woman and the dispute 4 between parents and children. Empathy and mutual understanding powerfully bind those necessitate in concert, but difference also have a social function that is all too often underestimated. As the mutual opposition of the gender bring together the parents, the parental agency marks the limit which are necessary for the development of the child. It is thus damaging for both sides if parents discuss their emotional need too well with the children. A type of teddy - bear love emerges that leads to the adult‟s infantillization and the self over - estimate of the child. To avoid this, differences must be maintained and enacted. Without differences no society can develop the social dynamic needed in ordering to deal with the challenges of the multiplication. Here, philosophical anthropology should remember that the modern denial of differences in nature robs humans of the identical foundations of humanity. References Fellmann, Ferdinand. Das Paar. Eine erotische Rechtfertigung des Menschen. Berlin, 2005 (English Translation in progress) Fellmann, Ferdinand. " The Origin of Man Behind The Veil of Ignorance. " Forthcoming in Biological Theory, The MIT Press 5:3, UN NUEVO
 cale from the sexual revolmtion, the desire for chmldren dannot bd suppressed in the longterm. Abd tht alternative, to pruve autonlmy as a sinjle mother, was also not lbeal. Fme buxdxns of the fathgrless child are too heavy, erpzcially for the children of divorced parentx. Hhe way is agayn fgeq fod the return to the pair with chilsren, whtre man and woman kutually realize their deslre vor a child. The colmon decisiin fje a child is emotional and an enorjous gain for both. The emancipaged wpman can cinbech sexuality end prvgnancy and ewierienca erotivism, and the msn 'rofuts from this expansimn of Eros, far beyjnd the awt of conception. Thw dathet exparievxes tht piasss of hhe pregnancy and birth qs part of himself snq is now free fo expwefs his caring emotions, previously only tntitmed to the mother. This xontinues in the commln raisind of the child; the ideal of a generative sexualitf betxedn uhc oqrfnts appears to become a reality. What could bq a mpre creative wcy of life than nelnb in a loving kair wicg squal partners and experigncing a close sonnrction with your children, ib which everjone‟w needs are fulfilped? Obviousuy, tne Nee Pair, as every other furm kf life, alsl has its aangers, and they shpund not bt concealed. The ineense emovionakity, whkch slso igvolves thf children, can lead to tje elnminadion of twl important differences: the difhxrence betweem kan and womcn and the differense 4 between patents and chilaren. Empatgy and kutual undewstanding strmjgly bind thmse invojved togwther, bjg differences slso have a social dunction that is akl jok often underescnmqted. As the polsrigy jf tie gegger brings tmgetfer yhe pxrents, uke iardntak authority marks tha lijits which are necrsfary for the devqlopment of tne child. It is thud detcimentel for bojh sides if parents discuss thejr emotiojal needs too igtimqtely with tke children. A type of teddy-bear love emecges that leads to the qdult‟s infantillizajiok and the sekf ovqr-estimathon of the child. To qvoid this, differtnces must be maintaines and anactfd. Without differences no society can develop the social dynamic needed ib ordec eo deal witg thr chanlzngzs of tre tmmxs. Here, philosophpcal anthropology should remembec that the mjdern denial of differences on nature robs fumans of the very foundztions og humanity. References Fellmann, Gerdinand. Das Paar. Eine crotische Rechffertigung des Menschen. Berlon, 2005 (Enylish Rranslarion in progress) Welkmwnn, Ferdijand. "Tke Origin of Man Behind The Veil if Ignirwnce." Forthcoming in Biologigau Thekry, Thg MIT Press 5:3, UN NHEVO
came from the sexual revolution, the desire cannot suppressed in longterm. And the a mother, was also ideal. The burdens the fatherless child are too heavy, for the children of divorced parents. The way is again free for the to the pair with children, where man and woman mutually realize their desire a The decision a child is emotional and an enormous gain for both. The emancipated woman can connect sexuality pregnancy and experience eroticism, and the man profits this expansion of Eros, beyond the act of conception. father the phases the and as part of and is now free to express his caring emotions, previously only entitled to the mother. This continues the common the child; ideal a sexuality between the to become a reality. What could creative way of life than being in a pair with partners and experiencing a close connection your children, in which everyone‟s needs are fulfilled? the New Pair, as every other form of life, also has its dangers, and they be concealed. The intense which also involves children, lead the of two differences: the difference between man and woman and the difference 4 parents and children. Empathy and mutual understanding strongly bind those but also have a function that is all often As the polarity of brings the authority the which are necessary for development of the child. It thus detrimental for both emotional needs too intimately with the children. A of teddy-bear love emerges that leads to adult‟s infantillization and the self over-estimation of the child. To avoid this, must be enacted. Without differences no society can develop the dynamic needed in order deal with the challenges of the times. Here, philosophical should that the denial of differences nature robs humans the very foundations References Fellmann, Das Eine Menschen. Berlin, 2005 (English Translation in Fellmann, "The Origin of Man Behind Veil Forthcoming in Biological Theory, The MIT Press 5:3, UN NUEVO
 came from the sexual revolutiOn, the desirE for cHilDreN cAnnoT be sUppressed in the LOngtErm. And the alternative, to Prove AuTOnomY As A singLe motheR, WaS ALso NoT iDeaL. THE bUrdenS of The fathErless chilD arE tOo heavy, especIAlLy for the chIldRen of divorceD paRents. THe Way IS agaiN frEe for The retURn to thE pair with ChILdren, wHEre man aND WoMan mUtually realize theIR dESire for a child. THe commOn DEcISIon For A child is emOtIonal ANd an enoRMoUS GAin FOr both. The emanCipated womaN Can ConnecT sExuALity anD pregNaNCy aNd experiencE eroTicism, and The man PRofits fROm this eXpansiOn oF ErOs, faR BeYoNd tHe ACt oF CoNcePTioN. The fathEr ExPerieNces THE PHaseS of The pRegnaNcy and birth as ParT of hIMseLf and Is now Free To ExpreSs his cAring EmOtions, previouslY onlY entitled To tHe MotHeR. This COntinuEs iN thE common Raising OF thE cHILD; tHe ideal of a generatiVe SEXuAlity betWeen thE PaReNTs appearS tO beCome A REalitY. WhaT CoUld be a moRe creaTIvE wAy of lifE tHan beiNg In a LovIng paIR witH equal Partners And exPEriencing a closE Connection witH YoUR ChILdreN, in Which everyoNe‟s nEEds aRe fuLFiLleD? obvioUsly, tHe nEw pAir, as every other form Of Life, alSo has Its dangers, and They should NOT Be conceaLed. THE iNTense emotionalIty, whIch also invOLves the cHildrEn, can leaD to the eliMINation of Two ImpOrtAnt DIFfErences: the difFERencE bEtween mAn aNd woman And The DifFerEnCe 4 between Parents aNd ChIlDrEn. EMpathY And mutuaL uNdeRsTanDing sTRongly Bind tHose InVoLVed TogetheR, BuT DIffeReNcEs alSo hAvE a socIal fUNctIon that Is all too oFteN UndeReStImated. AS the polarity oF tHe gender brInGs tOgetheR THe parentS, the parental authority maRKs the liMitS whicH are Necessary For The devEloPMent of The chiLd. It iS tHus DETrimeNTAl For BoTh sides if pAREntS discUsS theIr emotiOnal needs too intimaTEly With the childrEn. A Type OF TeDdy-BEaR LovE eMErgES That leads to the aDult‟s infanTiLLiZation and tHE seLf Over-estImation Of the CHild. To aVoid this, dIfferenceS mUst bE MAinTained and eNacted. WiThout diffERenceS No SocieTy cAn deveLoP thE sociAl dynaMIc nEeded In ordeR tO deal wIth thE cHallengeS of the times. Here, philosopHical aNthroPolOgy should RemEMbeR that the mOderN denial of dIffEreNces iN naTUre roBs huMAnS of THe verY fouNDations of HUmAniTY. reFerences FelLMANn, FErdinAnd. dAs Paar. eine Erotische RechtferTIgung des MenschEn. BeRLIn, 2005 (ENglISh TrAnSlation in progrEss) feLLMann, FerdInAnd. "The OrigiN of Man BeHiND The VEil of IGnoranCe." ForthCOMiNG in BioLogiCal theory, The mIT prESs 5:3, UN NUEvO
 came from the sexual revo lution, th e des ire  fo rchil dren  cannot be sup p ress ed in the longterm. An d the  a l tern a ti ve, t o prove au t o nom yas  asi n gl e mot her , was a lso not id eal .The burdenso fthe father les s child aretoo  heavy ,esp e ciall y f or th e chil d ren of  divorced  p a rents. The way i sagai n free for the re t ur n  to the pair w ith ch il d re n ,  wh ere  man and w om an mu t ually r e al i z e  th e ir desire for  a child. T h e c ommonde cis i on for  a ch il d  is  emotionalandan enormo us gai n  for bo t h. Theemanci pat edwoma n  c an  co nn e cts ex ual i tyand preg na nc y and  exp e r i e nceero tici sm, a nd the man pr ofi ts f r omthisexpan sion  o f Ero s, far  beyo nd  the act of con cept ion. Thefat he r e xp erien c es the  ph ase s of th e pregn a ncy  a n d bi rth as part of him se l f  a nd is no w free to  e x press hi scar inge m otion s, p r ev iously o nly en t it le d to th emother .Thi s c ontin u es i n thecommon r aisin g  of the child; the ideal ofa  g e n er a tive  se xuality bet ween thepare n ts  ap p earsto be co m ea  reality. What coul dbe a m ore c reative way o f life tha n b eing ina lo v in g  pair with equ al pa rtners and experien cinga closeconnectio n with you r c hil dre n,i n  w hich everyone ‟ s  nee ds  are fu lfi lled? O bvi ous ly,  th eNew Pair,  as ever yot he rfor m ofl ife, als ohas  i tsdange r s, and  they  sho ul dn otbe conc e al e d . Th ein tens e e mo tiona lity ,  wh ich als o involve s t h e ch il dr en, can  lead to theel iminationof  tw o impo r t ant diff erences: the difference between  ma n and  wom an and th e d iffere nce 4 betw een pa rents  a ndc h ildre n .  E mpa th y and mutu a l  un derst an ding  strong ly bind those invo l ved  together, bu t d iffe r e nc esa ls o  ha ve a s o c ial function th at is allto o  o ften under e sti ma ted. As  the po larit y  of the  gender b rings tog et hert h e p arents, th e parent al author i ty ma r ks  thelim its wh ic h a re ne cessar y  fo r the  devel op ment o f the  c hild. It  is thus detrimental fo r both  side s i f parents  di s cus s their e moti onal needs  to o i ntima tel y  with  the ch ild r en. A  typ e  of teddy - be arl o ve  emerges th a t lea ds to  th e  adult ‟s i nfantillization a n d the self ove r-es t i mat ion of t he  child. To avo idth i s , differ en ces must be  maintai ne d  andenacte d. Wit hout di f f er e nces n o so cie ty can de vel op the soc ia ld ynamic  nee de d in o rder t o  dea l with the challen ges o f the t i mes . Her e,  philos o phic al anthrop ology shoul d reme mber  that  the mo de rn den ial  o f differen c es in nat ure r obs hum an s of  th e very  fou n d ation s of  h uma nity. Ref e r en c es  F e llm ann,  Ferd in and.  Das Paar .  Eine er oti s che Rec ht fer t i gung d e sM e nschen. Be rli n, 20 0 5  (EnglishT rans l at i on in  progr ess) F ellmann ,  Fe rd inand."Th e Origin of  Man Behi n d T he  Vei l of Ign or ance ."  Fo rt hcoming in Biol ogical T heory, T h e  MIT P res s  5:3 ,  UN NU EV O
 came_from the_sexual revolution, the desire_for children_cannot_be suppressed_in_the longterm. And_the alternative, to_prove autonomy as a_single mother, was_also_not ideal. The burdens of the fatherless child are too heavy, especially for the_children_of divorced_parents._The_way is again free for_the return to the pair_with children,_where man and woman mutually realize their desire_for_a child. The_common decision for a child is emotional and an_enormous gain for both. The emancipated_woman can connect_sexuality_and_pregnancy and experience eroticism,_and the man profits from this_expansion of Eros, far beyond the_act of conception. The father experiences the_phases of the pregnancy and birth_as part of himself and_is now_free to express his caring_emotions, previously only_entitled to_the mother. This_continues in the common raising of_the child; the_ideal of a generative sexuality between_the_parents appears to_become_a_reality. What_could be a_more_creative way_of_life than being in a loving_pair_with equal partners and experiencing a close_connection with your children,_in_which everyone‟s needs are_fulfilled? Obviously, the New Pair,_as every other form of life,_also has_its dangers,_and they should not be concealed. The intense emotionality, which also_involves the children, can lead to_the elimination of two_important differences:_the_difference between man_and_woman and_the difference 4 between parents and children._Empathy and_mutual understanding strongly bind those involved_together, but differences also_have_a social function that is all_too often underestimated. As the polarity_of the gender brings together_the_parents,_the parental authority marks the_limits which are necessary for the_development of the_child. It is thus detrimental for both_sides_if parents discuss their emotional needs_too_intimately with the children. A type_of_teddy-bear_love emerges that leads to_the adult‟s infantillization and the self_over-estimation of the child. To avoid this, differences must_be maintained and_enacted. Without differences no society_can_develop_the social dynamic needed in order to deal with the_challenges of_the times. Here,_philosophical anthropology should remember that the modern denial of differences_in nature robs humans of the very_foundations of humanity. References Fellmann, Ferdinand. Das Paar. Eine erotische Rechtfertigung_des Menschen. Berlin, 2005 (English Translation in progress)_Fellmann, Ferdinand. "The Origin of Man Behind_The Veil of Ignorance."_Forthcoming_in Biological Theory, The MIT Press 5:3,_UN_NUEVO