 degree in Clinical Psychology. He writes film-criticism for VCinema, a website dedicated for Asian Cinema. He was a fellow of the 2018 Yamagata International Documentary Film Festival and Film Festival Dokumenter – Jogja's Film Criticism Workshop. He is also a filmmaker and scholar currently taking his Masters in Media Studies (Film) at the University of the Philippines – Film Institute. As a filmmaker, his works have been screened at S-Express, Cinemanila International Film Festival, FACINE – Filipino Arts and Cine Festival, Gawad CCP Para sa Alternatibong Pelikula at Bidyo, and QCinema International Film Festival. His research interest includes the role of ideology in cinema and deployments of new moving image disciplines across mediums. DEVELOPMENT AND REASONS B M LB What is Good and Why: the Ethics of Well-Being. B R K. (Harvard UP, . Pp. xi + . Price £..) Richard Kraut's What is Good and Why is his first full-length foray into ethical theory. Of course, he has done plenty of ethical theory in working on Plato and Aristotle. In the decades since its publication, his  paper 'Two Conceptions of Happiness' has been seminal in philosophical investigations into human well-being. But What is Good differs from Kraut's earlier work by attempting a full-scale development and defence of a central element in ethical theory, in just the way its title suggests. One way to construe this work is as a development or completion of the earlier paper. But to leave it at that would be an injustice; Kraut's ambitions extend much further – to the role of the good overall in practical thinking. Kraut carries out this larger project in his characteristically lucid style. He frames a distinctive view which offers original contributions across a wide variety of subdisciplines within ethics. In fact, his view is remarkable for the range of positions it disag
degree in Clinical Psychology. He writes film - criticism for VCinema, a website dedicate for Asian Cinema. He was a colleague of the 2018 Yamagata International Documentary Film Festival and Film Festival Dokumenter – Jogja's Film Criticism Workshop. He is also a filmmaker and scholar presently taking his Masters in Media Studies (Film) at the University of the Philippines – Film Institute. As a filmmaker, his works have been screen at S - Express, Cinemanila International Film Festival, FACINE – Filipino Arts and Cine Festival, Gawad CCP Para sa Alternatibong Pelikula at Bidyo, and QCinema International Film Festival. His research interest include the role of ideology in film and deployments of new moving image discipline across mediums. growth AND REASONS B M LB What is Good and Why: the Ethics of Well - Being. B R K. (Harvard UP, . Pp. xi + . Price £ ..) Richard Kraut's What is full and Why is his first full - length foray into ethical hypothesis. Of course, he has done batch of ethical theory in work on Plato and Aristotle. In the decades since its issue, his  paper' Two Conceptions of Happiness' has been seminal in philosophical investigations into human well - organism. But What is Good differs from Kraut's earlier work by attempting a full - scale development and defence of a central element in ethical theory, in just the way its title suggests. One way to construe this employment is as a development or completion of the earlier newspaper. But to bequeath it at that would be an injustice; Kraut's ambitions extend much far – to the function of the good overall in practical thinking. Kraut carry out this larger project in his characteristically lucid style. He frames a distinctive view which offers original contributions across a wide variety of subdisciplines within ethic. In fact, his view is noteworthy for the compass of positions it disag
 dehree in Clinical Psycholugy. He writes fnom-critmcism fkr VCineoa, a website dedicated for Adiqn Cibema. He was a fellow ow the 2018 Yalagata Ibteriational Documenvzry Film Festjyal aud Film Festival Dokumentes – Jogja's Film Cficicism Workshop. He is also a filmmakqr and xcjolar currentli takpnd hia Masters in Media Studies (Film) at the Unpversity of the Pnilippines – Film Institute. As w filmmaker, his wogks have begh sseeened at S-Ebpress, Cintmcnila Interhational Film Festival, FACINE – Wilipnno Arts ane Xinf Festival, Gewad CBP Para sa Albvrnatibmng Pelokula at Bidyo, anv QCunema International Fmlm Festival. His resgarch inteseat includes the rilw of hdeonogy un zintma ahd deppoyjents of nsw moving inage disciplines actofw mediums. DEVSLOPMEGT AND REASONS B M LB What is Good and Whj: ths Ethics of Well-Being. B R K. (Harvard UP, . Pp. xl + . Price £..) Richard Kraut's What is Good and Why is his firsd fulm-uenybm fofqy into ethical theory. Of course, he has done plqhtu pf ethical thejry in workonh pg Plato and Atistotlz. Ih the decades sincf its poblicarion, his  paprr 'Two Conceptions of Happibess' has beeu swminal in philosopkical investngatioms inyo human well-being. But Chat ia Good difffrs from Ifaut's earlier wofk ny dttempting a full-scale devqlopment end dzfence ow a ventraj element ln etmhcal theory, in jush the wdy its titpe suggests. One way to construe this work is ss a gevelopmznt or completion os the earlier kaper. But to ldave it at that wmuld be an ynjustice; Kragj's ambitions xxtend mush fyrthwr – to gfe role of the good ovegajl ib practical thinkikg. Krxht carries out ckiw larger projecy iv hys ciaracearistically nucia sgule. Hd frames a birtinvtive view which offars kriginal contributooks across a wide dariety of sundisciplines withij ethmcs. In fact, hif view is remarkable for the rznge of plsibions it disad
degree in Clinical Psychology. He writes film-criticism a dedicated for Cinema. He was Yamagata Documentary Film Festival Film Festival Dokumenter Jogja's Film Criticism Workshop. He is a filmmaker and scholar currently taking his Masters in Media Studies (Film) at University of the Philippines – Film Institute. As a filmmaker, his works have screened S-Express, International Festival, FACINE – Filipino Arts and Cine Festival, Gawad CCP Para sa Alternatibong Pelikula at Bidyo, QCinema International Film Festival. His research interest includes role of ideology in and deployments of new moving disciplines mediums. DEVELOPMENT REASONS M What is Good Why: the Ethics of Well-Being. B R K. (Harvard UP, . Pp. xi + . Price £..) Kraut's What and Why his full-length into ethical theory. he has done plenty of ethical on Plato and Aristotle. In the decades since publication, his paper 'Two Conceptions of Happiness' has seminal in philosophical investigations into human well-being. But is Good differs from Kraut's earlier work by attempting a full-scale development and defence of element in ethical theory, just the way title One to this work as a development or completion of the earlier paper. But to it at that would be an injustice; Kraut's ambitions extend – the role of good overall in practical Kraut out this larger project characteristically style. distinctive which original contributions across a variety of subdisciplines within ethics. fact, his view is positions it disag
 degree in Clinical PsychologY. He writes fIlm-crItiCisM fOr VCInemA, a website dedicATed fOr Asian Cinema. He was a felLow of ThE 2018 yamaGAtA InteRnationAL DOCUmeNtArY FiLm fEsTival And film FesTival DokumEntEr – jogja's Film CrITiCism WorkshOp. HE is also a filmMakEr and sChOlaR CurreNtlY takiNg his MASters iN Media StuDiES (Film) aT The UnivERSiTy of The Philippines – FilM inSTitute. As a filmmAker, hiS wORkS HAve BeeN screened aT S-expreSS, CinemaNIlA iNTerNAtional Film FeStival, FACINe – filIpino ARtS anD cine FeStivaL, GAWad cCP Para sa AlTernAtibong PeLikula AT Bidyo, aND QCinemA InterNatIonAl FiLM FEsTivAl. hIs rESeArcH IntErest incLuDeS the rOle oF IDEOlogY in CineMa and Deployments of New MoviNG imAge diSciplInes AcRoss mEdiums. dEVELoPmENT AND REASONS B m LB WHat is Good And whY: thE EThics OF Well-BEinG. B R k. (HarvarD UP, . Pp. xi + . pRicE £..) RICHArD Kraut's What is Good aNd wHY iS his firsT full-lENgTh FOray into EtHicAl thEORy. Of cOursE, He Has done pLenty oF EtHiCal theoRy In workInG on plaTo and aRistOtle. In The decadEs sinCE its publicatioN, His  paper 'Two CoNCePTIoNS of HAppIness' has beeN semINal iN phiLOsOphICal inVestiGaTIoNS into human well-being. buT What iS Good Differs from KrAut's earlieR WORk by atteMptiNG a FUll-scale develoPment And defence OF a centraL elemEnt in ethIcal theorY, IN just the Way Its TitLe sUGGeSts. One way to coNSTrue ThIs work iS as A develoPmeNt oR coMplEtIon of the eArlier paPeR. BUt To LeaVe it aT That woulD bE an InJusTice; KRAut's amBitioNs exTeNd MUch Further – TO tHE Role Of ThE gooD ovErAll in PracTIcaL thinkiNg. Kraut caRriES out ThIs Larger pRoject in his chArActeristicAlLy lUcid stYLE. He frameS a distinctive view which oFFers oriGinAl conTribUtions acrOss A wide vAriETy of suBdisciPlineS wIthIN EthicS. iN fAct, HiS view is remARKabLe for ThE ranGe of posItions it disag
 degree in Clinical Psycho logy. He w rites  fi lm- cr itic ismfor VCinema, a webs ite dedicated for Asia n Cin em a . He wa s a f ellow o f  t h e  20 18  Y ama ga t aInter nat ional D ocumentary  Fi lm  Festival an d  F ilm Festiv alDokumenter –  Jo gja'sFi lmC ritic ism  Work shop.H e is a lso a fil mm a ker an d  schola r cu rren tly taking his Ma s te r s in Media Stu dies ( Fi l m) a t t heUniversity  o f the Philipp i ne s –  Fi l m Institute.As a filmma k er,  his w or ksh ave be en sc re e ned  at S-Expre ss,Cinemanil a Inte r nationa l  Film F estiva l,FAC INE–  F il ipi no Art s  a ndC ine  Festiva l,  G awadCCPP a r a  saAlt erna tibon g Pelikula at  Bi dyo, and  QCin ema I nter na tiona l Film  Fest iv al. His researc h in terest in clu de s t he  role of ide olo gyin cine ma andd epl oy m e n ts  of new moving ima ge d is ciplines  acros s  m ed i ums. DEV EL OPM ENTA N D REA SONS B  M L B Wh a tis  Good a nd  Why:th e E thi cs of Well -Being . B R K . (Harvard UP, . Pp. xi +    . P ric e £..)Rich a rd K raut ' sWha t  is G ood a nd Wh y  is his first full- le ngth f orayinto ethicaltheory. Of c o urse, he  has do n e plenty of et hical  theory in workingon Pl ato andAristotle . In the d eca des  si nce i ts  publication, h is    paper  'T wo Conc ept ion s o f H ap piness' h as beense mi na linphilo s ophicalin ves ti gat ionsi nto hu man w ell- be in g . B ut What is G ooddi ff ersfro mKraut 's e a rli er work  by attem pti n g afu ll -scaledevelopment a nd  defence o fa c entral e lement i n ethical theory, in ju s t the w ayits t itle  suggests . O ne way  to constr ue thi s wor kisa s  a de v e lo pme nt  or comple t i onof th eearl ier pap er. But to leave i t  at  that would b e a n in j u st ice ;  K r aut 's amb i t ions extend muc h further–t othe role o f  th egood ov erall i n pra c tical t hinking.Kraut car ri es o u t  th is largerprojectin his ch a racte r is tical lylucidst yle . Heframes a d istin ctivevi ew whi ch of fe rs origi nal contributions acros s a wi de va rie ty of sub dis c ipl ines with in e thics. Infac t,his v iew is re mark a bl e f o r the  ran g e of posi t io nsi t  d isag
 degree_in Clinical_Psychology. He writes film-criticism_for VCinema,_a_website dedicated_for_Asian Cinema. He_was a fellow_of the 2018 Yamagata_International Documentary Film_Festival_and Film Festival Dokumenter – Jogja's Film Criticism Workshop. He is also a filmmaker_and_scholar currently_taking_his_Masters in Media Studies (Film)_at the University of the_Philippines –_Film Institute. As a filmmaker, his works have_been_screened at S-Express,_Cinemanila International Film Festival, FACINE – Filipino Arts and_Cine Festival, Gawad CCP Para sa_Alternatibong Pelikula at_Bidyo,_and_QCinema International Film Festival._His research interest includes the role_of ideology in cinema and deployments_of new moving image disciplines across mediums._DEVELOPMENT AND REASONS B M LB_What is Good and Why:_the Ethics_of Well-Being. B R K._(Harvard UP, ._Pp. xi_+ . Price_£..) Richard Kraut's What is Good_and Why is_his first full-length foray into ethical_theory._Of course, he_has_done_plenty of_ethical theory in_working_on Plato_and_Aristotle. In the decades since its_publication,_his  paper 'Two Conceptions of Happiness'_has been seminal in_philosophical_investigations into human well-being._But What is Good differs_from Kraut's earlier work by attempting_a full-scale_development and_defence of a central element in ethical theory, in just the_way its title suggests. One way_to construe this work_is as_a_development or completion_of_the earlier_paper. But to leave it at that_would be_an injustice; Kraut's ambitions extend much_further – to the_role_of the good overall in practical_thinking. Kraut carries out this larger_project in his characteristically lucid_style._He_frames a distinctive view which_offers original contributions across a wide_variety of subdisciplines_within ethics. In fact, his view is_remarkable_for the range of positions it_disag