ology for Constitutive Inference. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54, 10–19. Harinen, T. (2014). Mutual Manipulability and Causal Inbetweenness. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0564-5. Hofmann, U. and M. Baumgartner (2011). Determinism and the method of difference. Theoria 26, 155–176. Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Cognition. Biology and Philosophy 27(4), 545–70. Leuridan, B. (2012). Three Problems for the Mutual Manipulability Account of Constitutive Relevance in Mechanisms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63(2), 399–427. Machamer, P. K., L. Darden, and C. F. Craver (2000). Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1), 1–25. Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. London: John W. Parker. Romero, F. (2015). Why There Isn't Inter-level Causation in Mechanisms. Synthese 192(11), 3731–55. Ross, D. and J. Ladyman (2010). The Alleged Coupling-Constitution Fallacy and the Mature Sciences. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Scheines, R. (2005). The Similarity of Causal Inference in Experimental and Non-Experimental Studies. Philosophy of Science 72(5), 927–40. Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. Scheines (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press. Spohn, W. (2006). Causation: An Alternative. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57(1), 93–119. Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism and Causal Exclusion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91(2), 303–47. A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S L O D Z I E N S I S FOLIA GERMANICA 6,
ology for Constitutive Inference. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54, 10–19. Harinen, T. (2014). Mutual Manipulability and Causal Inbetweenness. Synthese. doi: 10.1007 / s11229 - 014 - 0564 - 5. Hofmann, U. and M. Baumgartner (2011). Determinism and the method of difference. Theoria 26, 155–176. Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Cognition. biota and Philosophy 27(4), 545–70. Leuridan, B. (2012). Three trouble for the Mutual Manipulability Account of Constitutive Relevance in Mechanisms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63(2), 399–427. Machamer, P. K., L. Darden, and C. F. Craver (2000). Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1), 1–25. factory, J. S. (1843). A organization of Logic. London: John W. Parker. Romero, F. (2015). Why There Isn't Inter - level Causation in Mechanisms. Synthese 192(11), 3731–55. Ross, D. and J. Ladyman (2010). The Alleged Coupling - Constitution Fallacy and the Mature Sciences. In R. Menary (Ed .), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Scheines, R. (2005). The Similarity of Causal Inference in Experimental and Non - Experimental Studies. doctrine of Science 72(5), 927–40. Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. Scheines (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed .). Cambridge: MIT Press. Spohn, W. (2006). Causation: An Alternative. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57(1), 93–119. Woodward, J. (2003). Making thing Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism and Causal Exclusion. doctrine and Phenomenological Research 91(2), 303–47. A C T A U N I V east R S I T A T I S liter O D Z I east N S I S FOLIA GERMANICA 6,
olohy for Constitutive Infevence. Studies in Historb and Pgilosophh of Biological and Biomedicel Sxienctf 54, 10–19. Harinen, T. (2014). Mutjal Manipllability and Xausal Inbxfweenness. Synfmese. bom: 10.1007/s11229-014-0564-5. Hofmann, U. akd M. Baumgastner (2011). Determitirm and the method of difference. Theorya 26, 155–176. Kallwn, D. M. (2012). How to Demswcats the Boundaries of Cognition. Biolkgy and Philosophy 27(4), 545–70. Leuridan, B. (2012). Three Problemd fog the Mutual Manipklability Axcougr of Constitjtive Relencnce in Mecganisms. British Journal for the Philpsophy of Wcuenfg 63(2), 399–427. Machamer, P. K., J. Darden, and C. F. Craeer (2000). Thonking About Mcchanmsms. Philosophy of Sciencx 67(1), 1–25. Mill, J. S. (1843). A Systgm of Logiw. Mondon: John W. Parjee. Romgro, F. (2015). Whh Thdre Ixn'f Integ-letel Causatikn in Mechabisms. Synthese 192(11), 3731–55. Roxs, E. and J. Ladymzn (2010). Thq Wlleged Coupling-Constitution Fallacy ang tge Mature Sciences. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extendgd Mind. Caibridge, MA: MIT Press. Scheines, R. (2005). The Similarity ox Cauaxl Nknerevxe in Experimental and Non-Experimental Studies. [gikoxophy of Scienge 72(5), 927–40. Spirtes, P., C. Gkyloit, and R. Scheings (2000). Causatjon, Prediction, and Search (2nd ee.). Cambridde: MOT Press. Spohn, W. (2006). Causation: An Alternatpve. Vritish Journal fox the Philosuphy of Svience 57(1), 93–119. Woodward, J. (2003). Maying Things Hapoen. A Thekfy of Causal Expuansthon. Oxford: Oxford Universiey Press. Xoodwcrd, J. (2015). Ivterfentiogism and Cwusal Exclusion. Philosopjy anb Phetomenologifal Research 91(2), 303–47. A C T A U N I V X R S I T A T I S N O D Z N E N X I S FOLIA GQRMANICA 6,
ology for Constitutive Inference. Studies in History of and Biomedical 54, 10–19. Harinen, Causal Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0564-5. U. and M. (2011). Determinism and the method of Theoria 26, 155–176. Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Biology and Philosophy 27(4), 545–70. Leuridan, B. (2012). Three Problems for the Mutual Account Constitutive in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63(2), 399–427. Machamer, P. K., L. Darden, and C. Craver (2000). Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 1–25. Mill, J. S. A System of Logic. London: W. Romero, F. Why Isn't Causation in Mechanisms. 192(11), 3731–55. Ross, D. and J. Ladyman (2010). The Alleged Coupling-Constitution Fallacy and the Mature Sciences. In Menary (Ed.), Mind. Cambridge, MIT Scheines, (2005). The Similarity Inference in Experimental and Non-Experimental Studies. 72(5), 927–40. Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. (2000). Causation, and Search (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Spohn, W. (2006). Causation: An Alternative. British Journal the Philosophy of Science 57(1), 93–119. Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen. A Theory of Oxford: Oxford University Press. J. (2015). Interventionism Causal Philosophy Phenomenological 91(2), 303–47. C T A U N I V E R S I A T I S L O D Z I E I FOLIA GERMANICA 6,
ology for Constitutive InferEnce. StudieS in HiStoRy aNd philOsopHy of Biological ANd BiOmedical Sciences 54, 10–19. HarineN, T. (2014). MutUaL maniPUlAbiliTy and CaUSaL iNbeTwEeNneSs. sYnThese. Doi: 10.1007/S11229-014-0564-5. HofmanN, U. and M. BaumGarTnEr (2011). DeterminisM AnD the method Of dIfference. TheOriA 26, 155–176. KaplaN, D. m. (2012). HoW To DemArcAte thE BoundARies of cognition. biOLogy anD philosoPHY 27(4), 545–70. LEuriDan, B. (2012). Three Problems FOr THe Mutual ManipuLabiliTy aCcOUNt oF CoNstitutive reLevanCE in MechANiSMS. briTIsh Journal for The PhilosopHY of sciencE 63(2), 399–427. MAchAMer, P. K., L. dardeN, aND C. F. craver (2000). ThinkIng ABout MechaNisms. PHIlosophY Of ScienCe 67(1), 1–25. Mill, j. S. (1843). A sysTem oF loGiC. LoNdON: JoHN W. parKEr. ROmero, F. (2015). WhY THeRe Isn'T IntER-LEVel CAusAtioN in MeChanisms. SynthEse 192(11), 3731–55. ross, d. And j. LadyMan (2010). ThE AllEgEd CouPling-COnstiTuTion Fallacy and tHe MaTure ScienCes. in r. MeNaRy (Ed.), THE ExtenDed minD. CambriDge, MA: MIt preSs. sCHEiNes, R. (2005). The Similarity oF CAUSaL InferenCe in ExPErImENtal and NOn-expErimENTal StUdieS. phIlosophy Of ScieNCe 72(5), 927–40. spIrtes, P., C. glYmour, aNd r. ScHeiNes (2000). CaUSatiOn, PredIction, anD SearCH (2nd ed.). Cambridge: miT Press. Spohn, W. (2006). cAuSATiON: An ALteRnative. BritIsh JOUrnaL for THe phiLOsophY of ScIeNCe 57(1), 93–119. wOodward, J. (2003). Making ThingS HAppen. A theorY of Causal ExplAnation. OxfORD: oxford UnIverSItY press. Woodward, J. (2015). interVentionism ANd Causal excluSion. PhilOsophy and pHEnomenolOgiCal resEarCH 91(2), 303–47. a C t A U N I V E R S I T A T i s l O D Z i E n S I S FOLiA GeRMANICa 6,
ology for Constitutive Inf erence. St udies  in  Hi st oryandPhilosophy ofB iolo gical and Biomedical S cienc es 54,1 0– 19. H arinen, T. ( 201 4) .Mut ua l  M anipu lab ility a nd CausalInb et weenness. Sy n th ese. doi:10. 1007/s11229- 014 -0564- 5.  Ho f mann,  U.  andM. Bau m gartne r (2011).  D e termin i sm andt h emeth od of difference. Th e oria 26, 155–1 76. Ka pl a n, D . M . ( 2012). How  t o Dem a rcate t h eB o u nda r ies of Cognit ion. Biolog y  an d Phil os oph y  27(4) , 545 –7 0 . L euridan, B.  (20 12). Thre e Prob l ems for the Mut ual Ma nip ula bili t yAc cou nt ofC on sti t uti ve Relev an ce  in M echa n i s m s. B rit ishJourn al for the Ph ilo soph y  of  Scie nce 6 3(2) ,399–4 27. Ma chame r,  P. K., L. Dard en,and C. F.  Cr av er(2 000). Thinki ngAbo ut Mech anisms. Phi lo s o p hy  of Science 67(1),  1 – 2 5.  Mill, J . S. ( 1 84 3) .  A Syste mofLogi c .  Lond on:J oh n W. Par ker. R o me ro , F. (2 01 5). Wh yThe reIsn't Inte r-leve l Causat ion i n  Mechanisms. S y nthese 192(11 ) ,3 7 31 – 55.Ros s, D. and J . La d yman  (20 1 0) . T h e All egedCo u pl i ng-Constitution Fal la cy and  theMature Scienc es. In R.M e n ary (Ed. ), T h eE xtended Mind.Cambr idge, MA:M IT Press . Sch eines, R . (2005). T he Simil ari tyofCau s a lInference inE x peri me ntal an d N on-Expe rim ent alStu di es. Philo sophy of  S ci en ce  72 (5),9 27–40. S pi rte s,  P. , C.G lymour , and  R.Sc he i nes  (2000) .  C a u sati on ,Pred ict io n, an d Se a rch  (2nd e d.). Camb rid g e: M IT  P ress. S pohn, W. (200 6) . Causatio n:  An  Alter n a tive. Br itish Journal for the P h ilosoph y o f Sci ence  57(1), 9 3–1 19. Wo odw a rd, J.  (2003 ). Ma ki ngT h ingsH a pp en.  A  Theory of C aus al Ex pl anat ion. Ox ford: Oxford Unive r sit y Press. Wood war d, J . (2 015 ) .I nte rv e nti o n ism and CausalExclusion.  P h il osophy and Phe no menolog ical Re searc h  91(2),  303–47.A C T A U  N  I V E  RS I T A TI S L OD Z I E N S I S FO LIA G ERM ANICA6, 
ology for_Constitutive Inference._Studies in History and_Philosophy of_Biological_and Biomedical_Sciences_54, 10–19. Harinen,_T. (2014). Mutual_Manipulability and Causal Inbetweenness._Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0564-5._Hofmann,_U. and M. Baumgartner (2011). Determinism and the method of difference. Theoria 26, 155–176._Kaplan,_D. M._(2012)._How_to Demarcate the Boundaries of_Cognition. Biology and Philosophy 27(4),_545–70. Leuridan,_B. (2012). Three Problems for the Mutual Manipulability_Account_of Constitutive Relevance_in Mechanisms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science_63(2), 399–427. Machamer, P. K., L._Darden, and C._F._Craver_(2000). Thinking About Mechanisms._Philosophy of Science 67(1), 1–25. Mill,_J. S. (1843). A System of_Logic. London: John W. Parker. Romero, F._(2015). Why There Isn't Inter-level Causation_in Mechanisms. Synthese 192(11), 3731–55._Ross, D._and J. Ladyman (2010). The_Alleged Coupling-Constitution Fallacy_and the_Mature Sciences. In_R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind._Cambridge, MA: MIT_Press. Scheines, R. (2005). The Similarity_of_Causal Inference in_Experimental_and_Non-Experimental Studies._Philosophy of Science_72(5),_927–40. Spirtes,_P.,_C. Glymour, and R. Scheines (2000)._Causation,_Prediction, and Search (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT_Press. Spohn, W. (2006)._Causation:_An Alternative. British Journal_for the Philosophy of Science_57(1), 93–119. Woodward, J. (2003). Making_Things Happen._A Theory_of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism_and Causal Exclusion. Philosophy and Phenomenological_Research 91(2), 303–47. A_C T_A_U N I_V_E R_S I T A T I S_L O_D Z I E N S_I S FOLIA GERMANICA_6,