(1), E9-E12. doi: 10.111 l/j,1460-2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. (2009). The role o f income inequality in a multivariate cross-national analysis of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 41-58. Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2009). Turnaround leadership for higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Funk, W. (2010). Will IT matter and how? In D. Kritt and L. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures (pp. 237-255). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 287 Gabberty, J. W., & Vambery, R. G. (2008). How technological determinism shapes international marketing. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 19-28. Glaser, B. G. (2009). Jargonizing: The use of the grounded theory vocabulary. The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1-15. Glaser, B. G. (2007a). All is data. The Grounded Theory Review, 6(2), 1-22. Glaser, B. G. (2007b). Doing formal theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook o f grounded theory (pp. 96-111). Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery o f grounded theory: Strategies fo r qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Gorski, P. C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity: Reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Urban Education, 44(3), 348-363. doi: 10.1177/0042085908318712 Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes, N., & Wright, C. (2006). The false promise o f technological determinism: The case of enterprise resource planning systems. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(1), 2-15. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom
( 1), E9 - E12. doi: 10.111 l / j,1460 - 2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. (2009). The role o f income inequality in a multivariate cross - home psychoanalysis of the digital watershed. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 41 - 58. Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2009). Turnaround leadership for higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey - Bass. Funk, W. (2010). Will IT matter and how? In D. Kritt and L. Winegar (Eds .), department of education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible future (pp. 237 - 255). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 287 Gabberty, J. W., & Vambery, R. G. (2008). How technological determinism shapes external selling. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 19 - 28. Glaser, B. G. (2009). Jargonizing: The use of the grounded hypothesis vocabulary. The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1 - 15. Glaser, B. G. (2007a). All is data. The Grounded Theory Review, 6(2), 1 - 22. Glaser, B. G. (2007b). Doing courtly hypothesis. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds .), The Sage handbook o f grounded hypothesis (pp. 96 - 111). Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery oxygen f ground theory: Strategies fo r qualitative inquiry. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Gorski, P. C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity: Reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and engineering. Urban Education, 44(3), 348 - 363. doi: 10.1177/0042085908318712 Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes, N., & Wright, C. (2006). The false promise oxygen f technological determinism: The case of enterprise resource planning systems. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(1), 2 - 15. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, education, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom
(1), E9-E12. doi: 10.111 l/j,1460-2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. (2009). The rule o f income nbequalmty in z multivxriate cross-national analysid if tht digital divide. Sozial Sciejce Compyter Eeview, 27(1), 41-58. Fnmlan, M., & Scott, N. (2009). Tuxneround leadershlp for highar education. Sdn Fxancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Funk, W. (2010). Will YT mattrr and how? In D. Hritu agd L. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technolkgy: Criuical perspectives, possible futures (pp. 237-255). Lanhwm, MF: Lexington Books. 287 Gabberty, J. W., & Dqmbery, R. G. (2008). Fow technological detetminism shapes international maryetiny. Internatiinql Hosiness & Ecoiomics Research Jomgnal, 7(1), 19-28. Claser, N. G. (2009). Jargonizikg: Thx usw of the grounded themry vocabulary. The Grounded Tkeory Review, 5(1), 1-15. Glaser, B. G. (2007a). Dll hs dxra. Ghe Gcouhded Tjeocy Review, 6(2), 1-22. Glaser, B. G. (2007b). Doing formal theprr. In A. Bryant & K. Chawmwz (Eds.), The Sage handbook o f grounded tveody (pp. 96-111). Retrieved from hrtp://srmo.sagepub.com/ Glader, B. G., & Ftrauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery o f grounded theory: Stsategmer fi v quxoihative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruytew. Gprxki, P. C. (2009). Insisbing on digital eqiihy: Teframing the aominauf siscourse on multifulturaj eduxation anq tevhnology. Urban Education, 44(3), 348-363. eoi: 10.1177/0042085908318712 Grant, D., Yall, R., Wailes, N., & Wxight, C. (2006). The falxe prpmise o f technological detsrminism: Thf case of dnterprise resoufce pnanning systems. New Technojogy, Work and Employoent, 27(1), 2-15. Greqnhow, C., Rohelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Leagning, taaching, anf scholarship in a digital age: Xxb 2.0 and classtook
(1), E9-E12. doi: 10.111 l/j,1460-2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. role f income in a multivariate divide. Science Computer Review, 41-58. Fullan, M., Scott, G. (2009). Turnaround leadership for education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Funk, W. (2010). Will IT matter and how? D. Kritt and L. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures 237-255). MD: Books. Gabberty, J. W., & Vambery, R. G. (2008). How technological determinism shapes international marketing. International Business Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 19-28. Glaser, B. G. Jargonizing: The use of grounded theory vocabulary. The Grounded Review, 1-15. Glaser, G. All data. The Grounded Review, 6(2), 1-22. Glaser, B. G. (2007b). Doing formal theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), Sage handbook grounded theory 96-111). from Glaser, B. G., A. L. (1967). The discovery o Strategies fo r qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Gruyter. Gorski, C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity: the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Education, 44(3), 348-363. doi: 10.1177/0042085908318712 Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes, N., & Wright, C. (2006). promise o f technological The case of resource systems. Technology, and Employment, 2-15. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom
(1), E9-E12. doi: 10.111 l/j,1460-2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. (2009). The role o f inCome inequaLity iN a mUltIvAriaTe crOss-national anaLYsis Of the digital divide. SociAl SciEnCE ComPUtEr RevIew, 27(1), 41-58. FullAN, M., & sCOtt, g. (2009). TUrNarOuND lEaderShiP for higHer educatiOn. SAn francisco, CA: JOSsEy-Bass. Funk, w. (2010). WiLl IT matter anD hoW? In D. KrItT anD l. WineGar (eds.), EdUcatioN And tecHnology: CrItICal perSPectiveS, POsSiblE futures (pp. 237-255). Lanham, Md: leXIngton Books. 287 GabBerty, J. w., & VAMbERY, R. G. (2008). how TechnologiCaL deteRMinism sHApES INteRNational markeTing. InternaTIonAl BusiNeSs & ECOnomicS ReseArCH JoUrnal, 7(1), 19-28. Glaser, b. G. (2009). JaRgonizing: the use OF the groUNded theOry vocAbuLarY. The gRoUnDed thEOry rEvIew, 5(1), 1-15. gLasEr, B. G. (2007a). All Is DaTa. The grouNDED theoRy REvieW, 6(2), 1-22. GlasEr, B. G. (2007b). Doing forMal TheoRY. In a. BryaNt & K. ChArmaZ (EDs.), The sage haNdbooK o F grounded theory (Pp. 96-111). ReTrieved frOm hTtP://srMo.SagepUB.com/ GlAseR, B. G., & strauss, a. L. (1967). The diSCovErY O F GrOunded theory: StrateGiES Fo R qualitaTive reSEaRcH. hawthornE, Ny: AlDine DE gruytEr. GoRSkI, P. C. (2009). InsisTing on DIgItAl equitY: REframiNg The DomInant DIscoUrse on MulticulTural EDucation and tecHNology. Urban EdUCaTIOn, 44(3), 348-363. DOi: 10.1177/0042085908318712 GrAnt, d., Hall, R., WaileS, N., & WrIGht, C. (2006). the fALsE prOMise o F techNoLOgICal determinism: The caSe Of enteRprisE resource planNing systemS. nEW TechnolOgy, WORk ANd Employment, 27(1), 2-15. GrEenhoW, C., Robelia, B., & hUghes, J. E. (2009). LEarniNg, teachiNg, and schoLARship in a DigItaL agE: WeB 2.0 ANd Classroom
(1), E9-E12. doi: 10.111 l /j,1460-24 66.20 10. 015 35 .x F uchs , C. (2009). T h e ro le o f income inequali ty in  a mult i va riate  cross- n at i o nal  a na lys is of  thedig ital di vide. Soci alSc ience Comput e rReview, 27 (1) , 41-58. Ful lan , M.,&Sco t t, G.  (2 009).  Turna r ound l eadership  f o r high e r educa t i on . Sa n Francisco, CA:J os s ey-Bass. Funk,  W. (2 01 0 ). W ill  IT  matter an dhow?I n D. Kr i tt a n d L .  Winegar (Eds .), Educati o n a nd tec hn olo g y: Cri tical  p e rsp ectives, po ssib le future s (pp. 237-255 ) . Lanha m, MD:  Le xin gton Bo ok s.28 7  Ga b be rty ,  J.  W., & V am be ry, R . G. ( 2 0 08).  Ho w te chnol ogical determ ini sm s h ape s int ernat iona lmarke ting.Inter na tional Business  & E conomicsRes ea rch  J ourna l , 7(1) , 1 9-2 8. Glas er, B.G . ( 20 0 9 ) .Jargonizing: The u se o fthe grou nded t h eo ry vocabula ry . T he G r o unded  The o ry  Review,  5(1), 1- 15 . Glase r,  B. G.  ( 200 7a) . All is d ata. T he Groun ded T h eory Review, 6 ( 2), 1-22. Gla s er , B. G. ( 200 7b). Doingform a l th eory .  I n A .  Brya nt &K. Ch a rmaz (Eds.), The Sa ge  handb ook o  f grounded t heory (pp. 9 6 -111). R etri e ve d  from http://s rmo.s agepub.com /  Glaser,  B. G ., & Str auss, A.L .  (1967).  Th e d isc ove r y  o  f grounded t h e ory:  S trategi esfo r qu ali tat ive  re se arch. Haw thorne,NY :Al di nede Gr u yter. Go rs ki,  P . C . (20 0 9). In sisti ng o ndi g ita l equit y :R e fram in gthedom in ant d isco u rse  on mul ticultura l e d ucat io nand tec hnology. Urba nEducation,  4 4(3 ), 348 - 3 63. doi:  10.1177/00420859083187 1 2 Grant , D ., Ha ll,R., Waile s,N., &Wri g ht, C.  (2006 ). Th efal s e  prom i s eo f  t echnologic a l  de termi ni sm:The cas e of enterprise re s our ce planning s yst ems. N ew  Te c hn o log y, Wor k and Employment,  27(1), 2- 15 .  G reenhow, C . , R ob elia, B ., & Hu ghes, J. E. ( 2009). Le arning, t ea chin g ,  an d scholars hip in a  digitala ge: W e b2.0 a ndclassr oo m
(1), E9-E12._doi: 10.111_l/j,1460-2466.2010.01535.x Fuchs, C. (2009)._The role_o_f income_inequality_in a multivariate_cross-national analysis of_the digital divide. Social_Science Computer Review,_27(1),_41-58. Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2009). Turnaround leadership for higher education. San Francisco,_CA:_Jossey-Bass. Funk,_W._(2010)._Will IT matter and how?_In D. Kritt and L._Winegar (Eds.),_Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures (pp._237-255)._Lanham, MD: Lexington_Books. 287 Gabberty, J. W., & Vambery, R. G._(2008). How technological determinism shapes international_marketing. International Business_&_Economics_Research Journal, 7(1), 19-28._Glaser, B. G. (2009). Jargonizing: The_use of the grounded theory vocabulary._The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1-15. Glaser,_B. G. (2007a). All is data._The Grounded Theory Review, 6(2),_1-22. Glaser,_B. G. (2007b). Doing formal_theory. In A._Bryant &_K. Charmaz (Eds.),_The Sage handbook o f grounded_theory (pp. 96-111)._Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ Glaser, B. G.,_&_Strauss, A. L._(1967)._The_discovery o_f grounded theory:_Strategies_fo r_qualitative_research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter._Gorski,_P. C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity:_Reframing the dominant discourse_on_multicultural education and technology._Urban Education, 44(3), 348-363. doi:_10.1177/0042085908318712 Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes,_N., &_Wright, C._(2006). The false promise o f technological determinism: The case of_enterprise resource planning systems. New Technology,_Work and Employment, 27(1),_2-15. Greenhow,_C.,_Robelia, B., &_Hughes,_J. E._(2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a_digital age:_Web 2.0 and classroom