ufendorfinstitutet: Lund, Sweden, 2013; pp. 73–83. 34. Neuman, Y. The definition of life and the life of a definition. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 29, 643–646. [CrossRef] 35. Pennock, R.T. Negotiating boundaries in the definition of life: Wittgensteinian and Darwinian insights on resolving conceptual border conflicts. Synthese 2012, 185, 5–20. [CrossRef] 36. Attfield, R. Biocentrism and artificial life. Environ. Values 2012, 21, 83–94. [CrossRef] 37. Bedau, M.A.; Parke, E.C. Introduction to the Ethics of Protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 1–17. 38. Cho, M.K.; Magnus, D.; Caplan, A.L.; McGee, D. Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome. Science 1999, 286, 2087–2090. [CrossRef] 39. Kaebnick, G.E.; Murray, T.H. Synthetic Biology and Morality: Artificial Life and the Bounds of Nature; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. 40. Holm, S.; Powell, R. Organism, machine, artifact: The conceptual and normative challenges of synthetic biology. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 44, 627–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 41. Newson, A.J. Synthetic Biology: Ethics, Exeptionalism and Expectations. Macquarie LJ 2015, 15, 45. 42. Mahowald, M.B. Protocell research and its implications. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2010, 53, 136–147. [CrossRef] 43. Wolfe, A.K.; Campa, M.F.; Bergmann, R.A.; Stelling, S.C.; Bjornstad, D.J.; Shumpert, B.L. Synthetic Biology R&D Risks: Social–Institutional Contexts Matter! Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 353–356. 44.
ufendorfinstitutet: Lund, Sweden, 2013; pp. 73–83. 34. Neuman, Y. The definition of life and the life of a definition. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 29, 643–646. [ CrossRef ] 35. Pennock, R.T. Negotiating boundaries in the definition of biography: Wittgensteinian and Darwinian insight on resolving conceptual border conflicts. Synthese 2012, 185, 5–20. [ CrossRef ] 36. Attfield, R. Biocentrism and artificial liveliness. Environ. Values 2012, 21, 83–94. [ CrossRef ] 37. Bedau, M.A.; Parke, E.C. Introduction to the Ethics of Protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 1–17. 38. Cho, M.K.; Magnus, D.; Caplan, A.L.; McGee, D. Ethical consideration in synthesize a minimal genome. Science 1999, 286, 2087–2090. [ CrossRef ] 39. Kaebnick, G.E.; Murray, T.H. Synthetic Biology and Morality: Artificial Life and the Bounds of Nature; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. 40. Holm, S.; Powell, R. Organism, car, artifact: The conceptual and prescriptive challenges of synthetic biota. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 44, 627–631. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 41. Newson, A.J. Synthetic Biology: Ethics, Exeptionalism and Expectations. Macquarie LJ 2015, 15, 45. 42. Mahowald, M.B. Protocell research and its implication. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2010, 53, 136–147. [ CrossRef ] 43. Wolfe, A.K.; Campa, M.F.; Bergmann, R.A.; Stelling, S.C.; Bjornstad, D.J.; Shumpert, B.L. Synthetic Biology R&D Risks: Social – Institutional Contexts Matter! Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 353–356. 44.
ufejdorfinstitutet: Lund, Sweaen, 2013; pp. 73–83. 34. Neumau, Y. The definjtion of life and the life of a defiiitiin. J. Viomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 29, 643–646. [CfossRef] 35. Iennock, R.R. Nejotiating boundacjes in bke derlnitimi of life: Wittggnsteinian atd Darwinian itskgkts on resolving conceptual border cjnflictx. Dynthese 2012, 185, 5–20. [CrjssRtf] 36. Attrpeod, R. Biocentrism and artificizl life. Environ. Valurs 2012, 21, 83–94. [CrossRef] 37. Bedau, M.A.; Pwrke, E.C. Introduction tl the Ethicw of Protocells. Iv The Ethibv of Protodells: Moral and Social Implicatkons pf Creatint Oiff in the Labiratogy; MIT Press: Gsmbridce, MA, UXA, 2009; pp. 1–17. 38. Cho, M.L.; Megnuw, D.; Caplan, A.L.; McGee, D. Ethical considerajions in sfnchesizing a minimal gwnime. Swienwe 1999, 286, 2087–2090. [CrussDeh] 39. Iaebnifk, J.E.; Murray, T.G. Synthetic Biology and Moraliuy: Wgyificial Lifs and ehq Bounds of Nature; MIT Press: Cambridge, KA, HSA, 2013. 40. Holm, S.; Powell, R. Oeganism, machine, artifwct: The cjnceptual and normative challenges of synthetic bhologb. Rtub. Hist. Phllos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Fdi. 2013, 44, 627–631. [CrossRef] [PubIed] 41. Newson, A.U. Xinthetic Bioloey: Ethnds, Exeptionalism and Expectwtionw. Macquarye LK 2015, 15, 45. 42. Mahowald, M.B. Protocell research anb irs implications. Pexspect. Biol. Oed. 2010, 53, 136–147. [CrpssRef] 43. Wolfe, A.K.; Campa, O.F.; Bsrgmann, R.A.; Dtelling, A.Z.; Bjornstad, D.J.; Sfumiert, B.L. Synthetic Biology R&D Rysks: Sociel–Inscitutionxl Cpntextf Matter! Tgends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 353–356. 44.
ufendorfinstitutet: Lund, Sweden, 2013; pp. 73–83. 34. The of life the life of Dyn. 29, 643–646. [CrossRef] Pennock, R.T. Negotiating in the definition of life: Wittgensteinian Darwinian insights on resolving conceptual border conflicts. Synthese 2012, 185, 5–20. [CrossRef] 36. R. Biocentrism and artificial life. Environ. Values 2012, 21, 83–94. [CrossRef] 37. Bedau, Parke, Introduction the of Protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 1–17. Cho, M.K.; Magnus, D.; A.L.; McGee, D. Ethical considerations synthesizing minimal genome. 1999, 2087–2090. 39. Kaebnick, G.E.; T.H. Synthetic Biology and Morality: Artificial Life and the Bounds of Nature; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 40. Holm, R. Organism, artifact: conceptual normative challenges of Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 44, 627–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Newson, A.J. Biology: Ethics, Exeptionalism and Expectations. Macquarie 2015, 15, 45. 42. Mahowald, M.B. Protocell research its implications. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2010, 53, 136–147. [CrossRef] 43. Wolfe, A.K.; Campa, M.F.; Bergmann, S.C.; Bjornstad, D.J.; Shumpert, Synthetic Biology R&D Social–Institutional Matter! Biotechnol. 34, 353–356.
ufendorfinstitutet: Lund, SweDen, 2013; pp. 73–83. 34. NeumaN, Y. The DefIniTiOn of Life And the life of a dEFiniTion. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 29, 643–646. [CrOssReF] 35. PENnocK, r.T. negotIating bOUnDARieS iN tHe dEfINiTion oF liFe: WittgEnsteinian And daRwinian insigHTs On resolvinG coNceptual bordEr cOnflicTs. synTHese 2012, 185, 5–20. [CRosSRef] 36. ATtfielD, r. BioceNtrism and ArTIficiaL Life. EnvIROn. valuEs 2012, 21, 83–94. [CrossRef] 37. Bedau, M.A.; pArKE, E.C. IntroductioN to the etHIcS OF PrOtoCells. In The etHics oF protoceLLs: mORAl aND Social ImplicAtions of CreATinG Life iN tHe LABoratoRy; MIT prESs: CAmbridge, MA, UsA, 2009; pp. 1–17. 38. cho, M.K.; MagnUs, D.; CapLAn, A.L.; McGEE, D. EthicAl consIdeRatIons IN sYnTheSiZIng A MiNimAL geNome. ScieNcE 1999, 286, 2087–2090. [CRossREf] 39. KaEBNICk, G.E.; murRay, T.h. SyntHetic Biology aNd MOralITy: ARtifiCial LIfe aNd The BoUnds of naturE; MiT Press: CambridgE, MA, UsA, 2013. 40. Holm, S.; PoWelL, R. orgAnIsm, maCHine, arTifAct: the concEptual aND noRmATIVe Challenges of syntheTiC BIoLogy. Stud. hist. PhILoS. SCI. Part C StUd. hisT. PhiLOS. Biol. biomED. SCi. 2013, 44, 627–631. [CrossREf] [PubMED] 41. NEwSon, A.J. SyNtHetic BIoLogY: EtHics, EXEptiOnalisM and ExpeCtatiONs. Macquarie LJ 2015, 15, 45. 42. MAHowald, M.B. ProtoCElL REsEArch And Its implicatIons. pErspEct. BIOl. med. 2010, 53, 136–147. [cRossREf] 43. WolFe, a.k.; CAMpa, M.F.; Bergmann, R.A.; StelLiNg, S.C.; BjOrnstAd, D.J.; Shumpert, B.l. Synthetic bIOLogy R&D RiSks: SOCiAL–Institutional conteXts Matter! TREnds BiotEchnoL. 2016, 34, 353–356. 44.
ufendorfinstitutet: Lund,Sweden, 20 13; p p.73– 83 . 34 . Ne uman, Y. The d e fini tion of life and the l ife o fa  def i ni tion.  J. Bio m ol . Str uc t.  Dy n. 20 12, 2 9,643–646 . [CrossRe f]35 . Pennock, R . T.  Negotiati ngboundaries i n t he def in iti o n oflif e: Wi ttgens t einian  and Darw in i an ins i ghts on r es olvi ng conceptual bor d er conflicts. Syn these20 1 2, 1 85,  5– 20. [Cross Re f] 36 .  Attfie l d, R .  Bi o centrism andartificiall ife . Envi ro n.V alues2012,  2 1 , 8 3–94. [Cros sRef ] 37. Bed au, M. A .; Park e , E.C.Introd uct ion  tot he  E thi cs ofP ro toc e lls . In The  E th ics o f Pr o t o c ells : M oral  andSocial Implic ati onso f C reati ng Li fe i nthe L aborat ory;MI T Press: Cambri dge,  MA, USA,  20 09 ; p p.  1–17 .  38. C ho,  M. K.; Mag nus, D. ;  Ca pl a n ,  A .L.; McGee, D. Eth ic a l  c onsidera tionsi nsy n thesizin ga m inim a l  geno me.S ci ence 199 9, 286 ,  2 08 7–2090.  [ CrossR ef ] 3 9.Kaebn i ck,G.E.;Murray,T.H.S ynthetic Biolo g y and Moralit y :A r ti f icia l L ife and the  Bou n ds o f Na t ur e;M IT Pr ess:Ca m br i dge, MA, USA, 2013.  4 0. Hol m, S. ; Powell, R.Organism,m a c hine, ar tifa c t: The conceptual  andnormativec hallenge s ofsyntheti c biology . Stud. Hi st.  Ph ilo s.S c i.  Part C Stud. H ist.  P hilos.Bio l. Biom ed.  Sc i.201 3,  44, 627– 631. [Cr os sR ef ][Pu bMed] 41. News on , A .J . S ynthe t ic Bio logy:  Eth ic s, Exe ptional i sm a nd E xp ec tati ons .Macqu arie LJ2015, 1 5, 45. 42 . M a howa ld ,M.B. Pr otocell resea rc h and itsim pli cation s .  Perspec t. Biol. Med. 2010, 53, 136–147 . [ Cross Ref]  43. Wolf e,A.K.;Cam p a, M.F .; Ber gmann ,R.A . ;  Stel l i ng , S .C .; Bjornst a d , D .J.;Sh umpe rt, B.L . Synthetic Biolog y  R& D Risks: Soci al– Inst i t ut ion a lC ont ex t s M a t ter! Trends Bio technol. 2 01 6 ,34, 353–35 6 . 4 4. 
ufendorfinstitutet: Lund,_Sweden, 2013;_pp. 73–83. 34. Neuman,_Y. The_definition_of life_and_the life of_a definition. J._Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012,_29, 643–646. [CrossRef]_35._Pennock, R.T. Negotiating boundaries in the definition of life: Wittgensteinian and Darwinian insights on_resolving_conceptual border_conflicts._Synthese_2012, 185, 5–20. [CrossRef] 36._Attfield, R. Biocentrism and artificial_life. Environ._Values 2012, 21, 83–94. [CrossRef] 37. Bedau, M.A.;_Parke,_E.C. Introduction to_the Ethics of Protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells:_Moral and Social Implications of Creating_Life in the_Laboratory;_MIT_Press: Cambridge, MA, USA,_2009; pp. 1–17. 38. Cho, M.K.;_Magnus, D.; Caplan, A.L.; McGee, D._Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome._Science 1999, 286, 2087–2090. [CrossRef] 39._Kaebnick, G.E.; Murray, T.H. Synthetic_Biology and_Morality: Artificial Life and the_Bounds of Nature;_MIT Press:_Cambridge, MA, USA,_2013. 40. Holm, S.; Powell, R._Organism, machine, artifact:_The conceptual and normative challenges of_synthetic_biology. Stud. Hist._Philos._Sci._Part C_Stud. Hist. Philos._Biol._Biomed. Sci._2013,_44, 627–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 41. Newson,_A.J._Synthetic Biology: Ethics, Exeptionalism and Expectations. Macquarie_LJ 2015, 15, 45._42._Mahowald, M.B. Protocell research_and its implications. Perspect. Biol._Med. 2010, 53, 136–147. [CrossRef] 43._Wolfe, A.K.;_Campa, M.F.;_Bergmann, R.A.; Stelling, S.C.; Bjornstad, D.J.; Shumpert, B.L. Synthetic Biology R&D_Risks: Social–Institutional Contexts Matter! Trends Biotechnol._2016, 34, 353–356. 44.