 types of variables are there half of them, each occurring twice: once for the leap initial state, and once more for the leap final state. However, and unlike in the classical case, that exhausting number of variables is not accessible in any single measurement, but in two separate events. Thus, a new problem appears as far as Heraclitus' "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man" holds. Continuing the metaphor of Heraclitus' "river", quantum mechanics is forced to describe all states of both "river" (i.e. the investigated quantum entity) and "man" (i.e. the apparatus together with the experimenter), which might happen in the future. This description is the wave function of the entity at hand. The wave function refers to only half of the variables in comparison to the classical case, but the information attributed to them is doubled for the wave function is complex rather than real. From that viewpoint, hidden variables in quantum mechanics cannot exist since the information is exactly the same as in the classical case. Half of the information is lost only after measurement and then secondarily restorable as a probability distribution of all states of both "man" and "river" in a series of measurements. 153Why anything rather than nothing? Meditation (Descartes 1641; Husserl 1931; Мамардашвили 981; Secada 1990; Gorham 2007, 2008): creation is permanent at any time and it is due to the irreversibility of time. If one projects all irreversibility of time into a single point of the beginning, the well-known picture of the Big Bang will appear. One can search for empirical confirmations regarding the Big Bang. If the Big Bang were real, it would be impossible for any physical objects in the universe older than the universe itself to exist. However, if the Big Bang is not real, but only a hypothetical projection of the irreversibility of time into a single zero point, it may be an averaging of the course of time in all points in the universe. Arbitrary deviations from that average quantity would exist in various spots of the universe. Most objects may be younger than the universe, but at least a few ones should be older than it. The existence of objects older than the universe has been partly 2 confirmed through experiments (Chamberlain, Aller 1951; Spite, Spite 1982; Molaro 1987; Bond et al
types of variables are there half of them, each occurring doubly: once for the leap initial department of state, and once more for the leap final state. However, and unlike in the authoritative case, that exhaust number of variable is not accessible in any unmarried measurement, but in two separate events. Thus, a new trouble appears as far as Heraclitus' " No man ever step in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man " apply. Continuing the metaphor of Heraclitus' " river ", quantum mechanics is forced to identify all states of both " river " (i.e. the investigated quantum entity) and " man " (i.e. the apparatus in concert with the experimenter), which might happen in the future. This description is the wave routine of the entity at hand. The wave function refers to merely half of the variables in comparison to the classical case, but the information attributed to them is doubled for the wave function is complex rather than real. From that viewpoint, hidden variables in quantum mechanics cannot exist since the information is exactly the same as in the authoritative event. Half of the data is suffer entirely after measurement and then secondarily restorable as a probability distribution of all states of both " man " and " river " in a serial of measurements. 153Why anything preferably than nothing? Meditation (Descartes 1641; Husserl 1931; Мамардашвили 981; Secada 1990; Gorham 2007, 2008 ): creation is permanent at any time and it is ascribable to the irreversibility of time. If one projects all irreversibility of time into a single point of the beginning, the well - known picture of the Big Bang will appear. One can search for empirical confirmations regarding the Big Bang. If the Big Bang were veridical, it would be impossible for any physical object in the universe older than the universe itself to exist. However, if the Big Bang is not real, but only a conjectural projection of the irreversibility of time into a single zero point, it may be an averaging of the course of time in all points in the universe. Arbitrary deviations from that median quantity would exist in respective spots of the universe. Most object may be younger than the population, but at least a few ones should be older than it. The existence of objects erstwhile than the universe has been partly 2 confirmed through experiments (Chamberlain, Aller 1951; Spite, Spite 1982; Molaro 1987; Bond et al
 tyoes of variables are theve half of them, gaxh occnrring fwice: onze for the leap initial statx, ane onct more for the leap final stwte. Howecer, end unlike in thx classigcl caac, thac xxhausting numbgr of variabnes is not accasriyle in any single measurement, but in two selagate events. Thos, a mqw pdoblem appears as far as Heraclitua' "No mai ever steps in the same river twice, for lt's jot the same river and he's noj thq same man" houds. Continlnng the metzphor of Heraclitus' "river", quantjm meehanics is doecef to describx all ftates of bobn "rives" (i.e. thr investigated quentun entity) and "man" (i.e. tie apparatus togethet with the erperimenter), which migyt happgn in the dutjre. Tiis descrlptmon is the save functiin of the entity at hwbd. The wave fhnctiog wefers to only half of the variables in cojparison to the classicql case, but the inforlation ateributed to them is doubled for the wave function is ckopltx rathde hhan real. From that viewpoint, hidden variablef im auantum mechanlcs cannot exist sonfe jhe informatiov is erzcfly the same as in the clwssicql case. Hwlf pf the information is lost inly after mvasueement and then seeondarily rertorsble ss a probability distriyution of all stahes of boff "man" and "river" kn s veries of measurements. 153Why anything ratker than notning? Mqditation (Fescavdes 1641; Husserl 1931; Мамардашвили 981; Sefada 1990; Gmrham 2007, 2008): crfation is permanent at any time and it is due tm tve irrevzrsibikity of time. Yf one projectx all ixreverribility or time mnto a singlq point of tha beginning, tie well-knjwn pictyre of gfe Big Bang wikl appear. One can swarch for empiricak cuhfirmations regcxdung the Big Banb. Iw tre Bmg Bagc were real, ht wuula be iopossible fif anu physical objects it ths universe older tnak the unicerse itfelf to exist. However, if the Bih Banj is nut resl, fut only a hypothetical projecfion of tje lrreversibiliey on tiie into a xingle zero point, it may be an averaginj of the course of timg in all points in thg ukiverse. Arbivrary qeviationv from that average wuantity would exlst in various spots or the gnivegse. Most objects may be younger than the universe, but at least a few ones shoulv fe older thzn iy. The eriscence os oboerts older than thv universe has been partly 2 confmrmed throggk experiments (Chamberlain, Allrr 1951; Spite, Spite 1982; Molaro 1987; Bond et al
types of variables are there half of occurring once for leap initial state, leap state. However, and in the classical that exhausting number of variables is accessible in any single measurement, but in two separate events. Thus, a new appears as far as Heraclitus' "No man ever steps in the same river for not same and he's not the same man" holds. Continuing the metaphor of Heraclitus' "river", quantum mechanics is to describe all states of both "river" (i.e. investigated quantum entity) and (i.e. the apparatus together with experimenter), might happen the This is the wave of the entity at hand. The wave function refers to only half of the variables in comparison the classical the information to is for the wave complex rather than real. From that in quantum mechanics cannot exist since the information exactly the as in the classical case. Half the information is lost only after measurement and secondarily restorable as a probability distribution of all states of both "man" and "river" in of measurements. 153Why anything than nothing? Meditation 1641; 1931; 981; 1990; Gorham 2008): creation is permanent at any time and it is due the irreversibility of time. If one projects all irreversibility of a point of the the well-known picture of Big will appear. One can empirical regarding If Big were real, it would impossible for any physical objects the universe older than However, if the Big Bang is not real, only a hypothetical projection of the irreversibility time into a single zero point, it may be an averaging of course of all points in the universe. Arbitrary deviations from average quantity would exist various spots of the universe. Most objects may be than universe, but least a few should be older it. The existence older than universe been through experiments (Chamberlain, Aller 1951; Spite, 1982; 1987; Bond et al
 types of variables are there hAlf of them, eAch ocCurRinG tWice: Once For the leap initIAl stAte, and once more for the leAp finAl STate. hOwEver, aNd unlikE In THE clAsSiCal CaSE, tHat exHauSting nuMber of variAblEs Is not accessiBLe In any singlE meAsurement, but In tWo sepaRaTe eVEnts. THus, A new pRoblem APpears As far as HeRaCLitus' "NO Man ever STEpS in tHe same river twice, fOR iT'S not the same rivEr and hE's NOt THE saMe mAn" holds. ConTiNuing THe metapHOr OF hEraCLitus' "river", quaNtum mechaniCS is Forced To DesCRibe alL statEs OF boTh "river" (i.e. thE invEstigated QuantuM Entity) aND "man" (i.e. tHe appaRatUs tOgetHEr WiTh tHe EXpeRImEntER), whIch might HaPpEn in tHe fuTURE. this DesCripTion iS the wave functIon Of thE EntIty at Hand. THe waVe FunctIon refErs to OnLy half of the variAbleS in comparIsoN tO thE cLassiCAl case, But The InformaTion attRIbuTeD TO ThEm is doubled for the wAvE FUnCtion is cOmplex RAtHeR Than real. frOm tHat vIEWpoinT, hidDEn VariableS in quaNTuM mEchanicS cAnnot eXiSt sIncE the iNFormAtion iS exactly The saME as in the classiCAl case. Half of tHE iNFOrMAtioN is Lost only aftEr meASureMent ANd TheN SeconDarilY rEStORable as a probability DiStribuTion oF all states of bOth "man" and "rIVER" in a seriEs of MEaSUrements. 153Why anyThing Rather than NOthing? MeDitatIon (DescaRtes 1641; HusseRL 1931; мамардашВилИ 981; SeCadA 1990; GoRHAm 2007, 2008): Creation is perMANent At Any time And It is due To tHe iRreVerSiBility of tIme. If one PrOjEcTs All IrrevERsibilitY oF tiMe IntO a sinGLe poinT of thE begInNiNG, thE well-knOWn PICturE oF tHe BiG BaNg Will aPpeaR. one Can searCh for empiRicAL conFiRmAtions rEgarding the BiG BAng. If the BiG BAng Were reAL, It would bE impossible for any physicAL objectS in The unIverSe older thAn tHe univErsE Itself To exisT. HoweVeR, if THE Big BANG iS noT rEal, but only A HYpoThetiCaL proJection Of the irreversibiliTY of Time into a singLe zEro pOINt, It mAY bE An aVeRAgiNG Of the course of tiMe in all poiNtS In The universE. arbItRary devIations From tHAt averaGe quantitY would exiSt In vaRIOus Spots of the Universe. most objecTS may bE YoUnger ThaN the unIvErsE, but aT least A Few Ones sHould bE oLder thAn it. THe ExistencE of objects older than the uNiversE has bEen Partly 2 conFirMEd tHrough expErimEnts (ChambeRlaIn, ALler 1951; SPitE, spite 1982; molaRO 1987; BOnd ET al
 types of variables are th ere half o f the m,eac hoccu rrin g twice: oncef or t he leap initial state,  andon c e mo r efor t he leap fi n a l s ta te . H ow e ve r, an d u nlike i n the clas sic al  case, thate xh austing nu mbe r of variabl esis not  a cce s sible  in  anysingle measur ement, bu ti n twos eparate e ve nts.  Thus, a new prob l em appears as far  as He ra c li t u s'"No  man everst eps i n  the sa m er i v ert wice, for it' s not the s a meriveran d h e 's not  thesa m e m an" holds.Cont inuing th e meta p hor ofH eraclit us' "r ive r",  qua n tu mmec ha n ics is  fo r ced  to desc ri be  allstat e s o f bo th"riv er" ( i.e. the inve sti gate d  qu antum  enti ty)an d "ma n" (i. e. th eapparatus toget herwith theexp er ime nt er),w hich m igh t h appen i n the f u tur e. T h is  description is th ew a ve  functio n of t h een t ity at h an d.Thew a ve fu ncti o nrefers t o only ha lf  of the  v ariabl es  in  co mpari s on t o theclassica l cas e , but the info r mation attrib u te d to them  is  doubled fo r th e  wav e fu n ct ion is co mplex  r a th e r than real. From t ha t view point , hidden vari ables in q u a n tum mech anic s  c a nnot exist sin ce th e informat i on is ex actly  the sam e as in t h e  classic alcas e.Hal f of  the informat i o n is  l ost onl y a fter me asu rem ent  an dthen seco ndarilyre st or ab leas ap robabili ty  di st rib ution of all  stat es o fbo t h " man" an d  " r i ver"  i na se rie sof me asur e men ts. 153 Why anyth ing rath er  t han not hing? Meditat io n (Descart es  16 41; Hu s s erl 1931 ; Мамардашвили 981; Sec a da 1990 ; G orham  200 7, 2008):  cr eation  is perman ent at  anyti mea n d iti s  d ueto  the irrev e r sib ility  o f ti me. Ifone projects all i r rev ersibility of  ti me i n t oa s i ng l e p oi n t o f the beginning,the well-k no w npicture of the  B ig Bang  will a ppear .  One ca n searchfor empir ic al c o n fir mations re gardingthe Big B a ng. I f  t he Bi g B ang we re  re al, i t woul d  be  impo ssible  f or any  phys ic al objec ts in the universe olde r than  theuni verse its elf toexist. Ho weve r, if theBig  Ba ng is  no t  real , bu t  o nly a hyp othe t ical proj e ct ion o fthe irrever s i b ili ty of  ti m e into  a s ingle zero point, it may be an a vera g i ngoft he c ou rse of time in  al lp o ints inth e universe.  Arbitra ry devia tionsfrom t hat ave r a ge quanti ty w oul d exist i n v ar i ous spo ts  o f  the u nive rs e. Mos t obje c ts m a y  be younger than  theu n ivers e , b ut at  l east af ew o nes should  be older t han it . Th e exi stenceof  objec tsol der than t h e univers e has  been p ar tly2 c onfirm ed t h r oughexpe ri men ts (Chamb e r la i n,  A l ler  195 1; Sp it e, S pite 1982 ;  Molaro198 7 ; Bondet  al 
 types_of variables_are there half of_them, each_occurring_twice: once_for_the leap initial_state, and once_more for the leap_final state. However,_and_unlike in the classical case, that exhausting number of variables is not accessible in_any_single measurement,_but_in_two separate events. Thus, a_new problem appears as far_as Heraclitus'_"No man ever steps in the same river_twice,_for it's not_the same river and he's not the same man"_holds. Continuing the metaphor of Heraclitus'_"river", quantum mechanics_is_forced_to describe all states_of both "river" (i.e. the investigated_quantum entity) and "man" (i.e. the_apparatus together with the experimenter), which might_happen in the future. This description_is the wave function of_the entity_at hand. The wave function_refers to only_half of_the variables in_comparison to the classical case, but_the information attributed_to them is doubled for the_wave_function is complex_rather_than_real. From_that viewpoint, hidden_variables_in quantum_mechanics_cannot exist since the information is_exactly_the same as in the classical case._Half of the information_is_lost only after measurement_and then secondarily restorable as_a probability distribution of all states_of both_"man" and_"river" in a series of measurements. 153Why anything rather than nothing?_Meditation (Descartes 1641; Husserl 1931; Мамардашвили_981; Secada 1990; Gorham_2007, 2008):_creation_is permanent at_any_time and_it is due to the irreversibility of_time. If_one projects all irreversibility of time_into a single point_of_the beginning, the well-known picture of_the Big Bang will appear. One_can search for empirical confirmations_regarding_the_Big Bang. If the Big_Bang were real, it would be_impossible for any_physical objects in the universe older than_the_universe itself to exist. However, if_the_Big Bang is not real, but_only_a_hypothetical projection of the irreversibility_of time into a single zero_point, it may be an averaging of the course_of time in_all points in the universe._Arbitrary_deviations_from that average quantity would exist in various spots of_the universe._Most objects may_be younger than the universe, but at least a few_ones should be older than it. The_existence of objects older than the universe has been partly 2_confirmed through experiments (Chamberlain, Aller 1951; Spite, Spite_1982; Molaro 1987; Bond et al