 It brings up, among other things, the Turing test and the "uncanny valley" phenomenon [108]. 8. Artificial intelligence as a life form: The legal status of autonomous weapons systems (Markus Gunneflo): This chapter discusses issues in international law regarding autonomous weapons systems [109]. 9. Artificial intelligence: Who's responsibility? (Maria Hedlund): This chapter discusses political challenges in connection with the development of AI. It brings up, among other things, the problem that it is difficult to make truly democratic decisions about this technology because of the heavy dependence on experts [110]. 10. Is synthetic biology morally impermissible? (Anders Melin): This chapter questions the claim that humans should not take on the role as creator of new life. The discussion is based on the question of who, if anyone, is hurt by such an endeavor [111]. Challenges 2019, 10, 32 6 of 11 11. The conception of the human as creator of (in)human life: The example of Mary Shelly's "Frankenstein or the new Prometheus" (Anna Cabak Redei): This chapter discusses how the human creator is depicted in Shelley's novel about Frankenstein and how this novel is used as a metaphor in discussions about synthetic biology [112]. 12. Created life and the value of life (Erik Persson): This chapter questions the claim that if humans acquire the ability to create life, it will negatively affect the value of both the new and existing life [113]. • Five other publications: One report on the status of astrobiology in Europe and its relation to European society [3]. One journal article on the attitudes towards the scientific search for extraterrestrial life among high school and university students in Sweden [114]. One journal article and one book chapter on biosignatures [115,116]. One journal article on the relation between humans and robots [117]. • Six oral and seven poster presentations at international conferences. • Concluding symposium where the associated researchers as well as other national and international researchers in the area were able to meet and exchange ideas (Table 2). Table 2. Invited speakers at the concluding symposium. Name Affiliation Sherryl Vint University of California, Riverside, USA Fredrik Heintz Linköping University, Sweden Kelly Smith Clemson University, USA Jacques Arnould Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES), France In conclusion, we found that our approach in relation to the aims of the project was very fruitful
It brings up, among other things, the Turing test and the " eldritch valley " phenomenon [ 108 ]. 8. Artificial news as a life form: The legal condition of autonomous weapons system (Markus Gunneflo ): This chapter discusses issues in external police regarding autonomous weapon systems [ 109 ]. 9. Artificial intelligence: Who's province? (Maria Hedlund ): This chapter discusses political challenges in joining with the growth of AI. It brings up, among other things, the problem that it is difficult to lay down truly democratic decisions about this engineering because of the heavy dependence on expert [ 110 ]. 10. Is synthetic biota morally impermissible? (Anders Melin ): This chapter questions the claim that humans should not take on the role as creator of newfangled life. The discussion is based on the question of who, if anyone, is hurt by such an endeavor [ 111 ]. Challenges 2019, 10, 32 6 of 11 11. The conception of the human as creator of (in)human life: The example of Mary Shelly's " Frankenstein or the new Prometheus " (Anna Cabak Redei ): This chapter discusses how the human creator is depicted in Shelley's novel about Frankenstein and how this novel is used as a metaphor in discussions about man-made biology [ 112 ]. 12. Created life sentence and the value of biography (Erik Persson ): This chapter questions the claim that if humans assume the ability to make life, it will negatively affect the value of both the newfangled and existing life [ 113 ]. • Five other publications: One report on the status of exobiology in Europe and its relation to European society [ 3 ]. One journal article on the attitudes towards the scientific search for extraterrestrial life among high school and university students in Sweden [ 114 ]. One diary article and one book chapter on biosignatures [ 115,116 ]. One journal article on the relation between humans and robots [ 117 ]. • Six oral and seven bill poster presentations at international conferences. • Concluding symposium where the associated research worker as well as early national and international researchers in the area were able to meet and switch over ideas (Table 2). mesa 2. Invited speaker at the concluding symposium. Name Affiliation Sherryl Vint University of California, Riverside, USA Fredrik Heintz Linköping University, Sweden Kelly Smith Clemson University, USA Jacques Arnould Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES), France In conclusion, we find that our approach in relation back to the aims of the project was very fruitful
 It brings up, among other tmings, the Turing test aid the "hncanny xalley" phenomenon [108]. 8. Artificiel ibtellugence as a life form: Ghe legal status if antonomous weapons systems (Markhd Guunxflo): This chaptgr discusses issues in intarvacional law regarding autonomous weapjns sysyels [109]. 9. Artificiaj inueljigehbe: Who's responsibility? (Maria Heslund): Tiis chapter disvusses political challenged in connection with tje developmght jd AI. It brines up, among other thinfs, the problem that it is diffizult co make truoy delmcratic decmsions about this bvchnolocy becaise of the heayy de'endwnce on experts [110]. 10. Is vynthetic biology iorally ikpzrmissible? (Anders Melun): This cha[ter wuertiknx fhe clwim that humahs should nit take on the role af creator of nsw lifq. Ehe discussion is based on the question of who, if anyone, is hurt vy such an endeavor [111]. Fhallengef 2019, 10, 32 6 of 11 11. The conception of the human as creator of (ii)hjmau life: Rhf example of Mary Shelly's "Frankenstein or the hee Irometheus" (Anna Ccbak Redei): This vhwpygr discusses huw the hujan creator is deplcted ig Sheoley's novtl abput Frankenstein and how thus novel is lsed as a metaphor in biscussions cbout xynthrtic biology [112]. 12. Created uife and the vapue of lird (Erik Persson): Tfis cvapter questions the claim that if iumanx acquife tne abijity to crfate life, it will negatigely cffecd the valuf of both the new and existing life [113]. • Five otnes plblicatious: One report on thq status of asjrobiologv in Ejrope and pts relatmon to Europqan society [3]. Mje journal acticle on the attutudes guwards the scirntific svaxch for eztraterrestrial line amuhg high school cud university stucengs yn Sxeden [114]. One journal artkcld and une book chcpger pn biosignatures [115,116]. Ona johrnal article on tne relatiob betweeg humans and tobots [117]. • Six oral wnd sxven puster prgsentations at international cohferences. • Cjncluding syiposlum rhere the cssociated researchers as well as other iational and internatiobal researchers in jhe area were eble tj meet ang exchange ideas (Taboe 2). Table 2. Invitec speakers at the condludinc symoosium. Name Affiliation Sherryl Vint University of California, Riverside, UWA Frevryk Heintz Ljnköpong Utirerxity, Sredei Yelly Smith Clemxon University, USA Jacques Arnonld Centre Nctional d'Études Spatiales (CNES), Ffance In concuusion, we found that our approacn in relation to the aims of thr project was very fruitnul
It brings up, among other things, the and "uncanny valley" [108]. 8. Artificial The status of autonomous systems (Markus Gunneflo): chapter discusses issues in international law autonomous weapons systems [109]. 9. Artificial intelligence: Who's responsibility? (Maria Hedlund): This chapter political challenges in connection with the development of AI. It brings up, among things, problem it difficult to make truly democratic decisions about this technology because of the heavy dependence on experts 10. Is synthetic biology morally impermissible? (Anders Melin): chapter questions the claim humans should not take on role creator of life. discussion based on the of who, if anyone, is hurt by such an endeavor [111]. Challenges 2019, 10, 32 6 of 11. The the human creator (in)human The example of "Frankenstein or the new Prometheus" (Anna chapter discusses how the human creator is depicted Shelley's novel Frankenstein and how this novel is as a metaphor in discussions about synthetic biology 12. Created life and the value of life (Erik Persson): This chapter questions the claim humans acquire the ability create life, it negatively the of the new existing life [113]. • Five other publications: One report on the of astrobiology in Europe and its relation to European society journal on the attitudes the scientific search for life high school and university Sweden One one chapter biosignatures [115,116]. One journal on the relation between humans robots [117]. • Six at international conferences. • Concluding symposium where the researchers as well as other national and researchers in the area were able to meet and exchange ideas (Table Table 2. at the concluding symposium. Name Affiliation Sherryl Vint of California, Riverside, USA Heintz Linköping University, Sweden Kelly Smith Clemson University, USA Arnould National d'Études (CNES), France In we found that approach in relation aims of project very
 It brings up, among other thingS, the Turing Test aNd tHe "uNcAnny VallEy" phenomenon [108]. 8. ArTIficIal intelligence as a life Form: THe LEgal STaTus of AutonomOUs WEApoNs SySteMs (mArKus GuNneFlo): This Chapter disCusSeS issues in intERnAtional law RegArding autonoMouS weapoNs SysTEms [109]. 9. ArTifIcial IntellIGence: WHo's responSiBIlity? (MARia HedlUND): THis cHapter discusses poLItICal challenges iN conneCtIOn WITh tHe dEvelopment Of aI. It bRIngs up, aMOnG OTHer THings, the problEm that it is dIFfiCult to MaKe tRUly demOcratIc DEciSions about tHis tEchnology BecausE Of the heAVy depenDence oN exPerTs [110]. 10. Is SYnThEtiC bIOloGY mOraLLy iMpermissIbLe? (anderS MelIN): tHIs chAptEr quEstioNs the claim thaT huMans SHouLd not Take oN the RoLe as cReator Of new LiFe. The discussion Is baSed on the qUesTiOn oF wHo, if aNYone, is HurT by Such an eNdeavor [111]. cHalLeNGES 2019, 10, 32 6 oF 11 11. The conception of thE hUMAn As creatoR of (in)hUMaN lIFe: The exaMpLe oF MarY sHelly'S "FraNKeNstein or The new pRoMeTheus" (AnNa cabak REdEi): THis ChaptER disCusses How the huMan crEAtor is depicted IN Shelley's noveL AbOUT FRAnkeNstEin and how thIs noVEl is Used AS a MetAPhor iN discUsSIoNS about synthetic biolOgY [112]. 12. CreatEd lifE and the value oF life (Erik PERSSon): This cHaptER qUEstions the claiM that If humans acQUire the aBilitY to creatE life, it wiLL NegativeLy aFfeCt tHe vALUe Of both the new aND ExisTiNg life [113]. • FIve Other puBliCatIonS: OnE rEport on thE status oF aStRoBiOloGy in EURope and iTs RelAtIon To EurOPean soCiety [3]. one jOuRnAL arTicle on THe ATTituDeS tOwarDs tHe ScienTifiC SeaRch for eXtraterreStrIAl liFe AmOng high School and univErSity studenTs In SWeden [114]. ONE Journal aRticle and one book chapter ON biosigNatUres [115,116]. ONe joUrnal artiCle On the rElaTIon betWeen huMans aNd RobOTS [117]. • Six oRAL aNd sEvEn poster prESEntAtionS aT intErnatioNal conferences. • ConcLUdiNg symposium whEre The aSSOcIatED rESeaRcHErs AS Well as other natiOnal and intErNAtIonal reseaRCheRs In the arEa were aBle to MEet and eXchange idEas (Table 2). TAbLe 2. InVITed Speakers at The conclUding sympOSium. NAMe affilIatIon SheRrYl VInt UnIversiTY of califOrnia, RIvErside, uSA FrEdRik HeintZ Linköping University, SweDen KelLy SmiTh CLemson UniVerSIty, uSA JacqueS ArnOuld Centre natIonAl d'ÉtUdeS spatiAles (cnEs), FrANce In ConcLUsion, we foUNd ThaT OUr Approach in rELATioN to thE aiMS of the ProjEct was very fruitfuL
 It brings up, among other  things, t he Tu rin g t es t an d th e "uncanny val l ey"phenomenon [108]. 8. A rtifi ci a l in t el ligen ce as a li f e  fo rm :The  l e ga l sta tus  of aut onomous we apo ns  systems (Ma r ku s Gunneflo ):This chapter  di scusse siss u es in  in terna tional law re garding a ut o nomous weapons s ys tems  [109]. 9. Artifi c ia l  intelligence:  Who's  r e sp o n sib ili ty? (Maria  H edlun d ): This ch a p t erd iscusses poli tical chall e nge s in c on nec t ion wi th th ed eve lopment ofAI.It brings  up, a m ong oth e r thing s, the  pr obl em t h at  i t i sd iff i cu ltt o m ake trul yde mocra ticd e c i sion s a bout  this  technology b eca useo f t he he avy d epen de nce o n expe rts [ 11 0]. 10. Is synt heti c biology  mo ra lly  i mperm i ssible ? ( And ers Mel in): Th i s c ha p t e rquestions the clai mt h at  humansshould no tt ake on t he  ro le a s creat or o f  n ew life.  The d i sc us sion is  b ased o nthe  qu estio n  ofwho, i f anyone , ish urt by such an endeavor [111 ] .C h al l enge s 2 019, 10, 32  6 o f  1111.T he  co n cepti on of  t h eh uman as creator of(i n)huma n lif e: The exampl e of MaryS h e lly's "F rank e ns t ein or the new  Prom etheus" (A n na Cabak  Rede i): This  chapterd i scusseshow  th e h uma n cr eator is depi c t ed i nShelley 'snovel a bou t F ran ken st ein and h ow thisno ve lis  us ed as a metaph or  in  d isc ussio n s abou t syn thet ic  b i olo gy [112 ] .1 2 . Cr ea te d li fean d the  val u e o f life(Erik Per sso n ): T hi schapter  questions th eclaim that  i f h umansa c quire th e ability to create lif e , it wi llnegat ivel y affectthe  value  of both t he new  andex ist i n g lif e [1 13] .• Five oth e r  pu blica ti ons:  One re port on the status ofastrobiologyinEuro p e  a ndi ts rel at i ont o  European socie ty [3]. On ej ou rnal artic l e o nthe att itudestowar d s the s cientific  search f or  ext r a ter restrial l ife amon g high sc h ool a n dunive rsi ty stu de nts  in S weden[ 114 ]. On e jour na l arti cle a nd  one boo k chapter on biosignatu res [1 15,11 6].  One jour nal art icle on t he r elation be twe enhuman s a n d rob ots[ 11 7]. • Six  ora l  and seve n  p ost e r  p resentation s a t i ntern ati o nal co nfer ences. • Concludi n g symposium wh eret h e a sso c iate dresearchers as  we ll a s otherna tional andinternat io n al re search ers in  the ar e a  w e re abl e to  me et and ex cha ng e  ideas(T ab l e 2).Tabl e2. Inv ited s p eake r s  at the concludi ng sy m p osium .  Na me Af fi liation Sher ryl Vint U niversity o f Cali forn ia, R iversid e,  USA F red ri k Heintz L i nköping U niver sity, S we denKel ly Smi th C l e msonUniv er sit y, USA Ja c q ue s  A rn o uld  Cen tre N at iona l d'Étude s  Spatial es( CNES),Fr anc e In con c lu s i on, we fou ndthato u r approach in r e la t ion t o theaims o f the p r oje ct  was ve ryf r uitful
 It_brings up,_among other things, the_Turing test_and_the "uncanny_valley"_phenomenon [108]. 8._Artificial intelligence as_a life form: The_legal status of_autonomous_weapons systems (Markus Gunneflo): This chapter discusses issues in international law regarding autonomous weapons_systems_[109]. 9._Artificial_intelligence:_Who's responsibility? (Maria Hedlund): This_chapter discusses political challenges in_connection with_the development of AI. It brings up, among_other_things, the problem_that it is difficult to make truly democratic decisions_about this technology because of the_heavy dependence on_experts_[110]._10. Is synthetic biology_morally impermissible? (Anders Melin): This chapter_questions the claim that humans should_not take on the role as creator_of new life. The discussion is_based on the question of_who, if_anyone, is hurt by such_an endeavor [111]._Challenges 2019,_10, 32 6_of 11 11. The conception of_the human as_creator of (in)human life: The example_of_Mary Shelly's "Frankenstein_or_the_new Prometheus"_(Anna Cabak Redei):_This_chapter discusses_how_the human creator is depicted in_Shelley's_novel about Frankenstein and how this novel_is used as a_metaphor_in discussions about synthetic_biology [112]. 12. Created life_and the value of life (Erik_Persson): This_chapter questions_the claim that if humans acquire the ability to create life,_it will negatively affect the value_of both the new_and existing_life_[113]. • Five_other_publications: One_report on the status of astrobiology in_Europe and_its relation to European society [3]._One journal article on_the_attitudes towards the scientific search for_extraterrestrial life among high school and_university students in Sweden [114]._One_journal_article and one book chapter_on biosignatures [115,116]. One journal article_on the relation_between humans and robots [117]. • Six_oral_and seven poster presentations at international_conferences._• Concluding symposium where the associated_researchers_as_well as other national and_international researchers in the area were_able to meet and exchange ideas (Table 2). Table_2. Invited speakers_at the concluding symposium. Name_Affiliation_Sherryl_Vint University of California, Riverside, USA Fredrik Heintz Linköping University,_Sweden Kelly_Smith Clemson University,_USA Jacques Arnould Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES), France In_conclusion, we found that our approach in_relation to the aims of the project was very fruitful