 Sandler, R.L., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2014; pp. 562–574. 77. Hantsche-Tangen, B. The Ambivalence of Protocells: Challenges for Self-Reflexive Ethics. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 199–220. 78. Van Den Belt, H. Playing God in Frankenstein's footsteps: Synthetic biology and the meaning of life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 79. Zoloth, L.; Watching, W.A.W. Second life: Some ethical issues in synthetic biology and the recapitulation of evolution. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 143–164. 80. Link, H.-J. Playing God and the intrinsic value of life: Moral problems for synthetic biology? Sci. Eng. Ethics 2013, 19, 435–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 81. Shelley, M.W. Frankenstein, or, the Modern Prometheus; Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, & Jones: London, UK, 1818. 82. Cranor, C. The acceptability of the risks of protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. 83. Joy, B. Why the future doesn't need us. Wired Mag. 2000, 8, 238–262. 84. Levy, S. Artificial Life: A Report from the Frontier Where Computers Meet Biology; Random House Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. 85. Persson, E. Ethics and the potential conflicts between astrobiology, planetary protection, and commercial use of space. Challenges 2017, 8, 12. [CrossRef] Challenges 2019, 10, 32 10 of 11 86. Rummel, J.D.; Race, M.; Horneck; the Princeton Workshop Participants, G. Ethical Considerations for Planetary Protection in Space Exploration: A Workshop; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.: New Rochelle, NY, USA
Sandler, R.L., Ed. ; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2014; pp. 562–574. 77. Hantsche - Tangen, B. The Ambivalence of Protocells: Challenges for Self - Reflexive Ethics. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 199–220. 78. Van Den Belt, H. Playing God in Frankenstein's footsteps: man-made biota and the meaning of life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 79. Zoloth, L.; Watching, W.A.W. Second life: Some ethical topic in celluloid biology and the recapitulation of development. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 143–164. 80. Link, H.-J. Playing God and the intrinsic value of animation: Moral problems for synthetic biota? Sci. Eng. Ethics 2013, 19, 435–448. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 81. Shelley, M.W. Frankenstein, or, the Modern Prometheus; Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, & Jones: London, UK, 1818. 82. Cranor, C. The acceptability of the risks of protocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. 83. Joy, B. Why the future doesn't need us. Wired Mag. 2000, 8, 238–262. 84. Levy, S. Artificial Life: A reputation from the Frontier Where Computers Meet Biology; Random House Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. 85. Persson, E. Ethics and the potential conflicts between astrobiology, planetary protection, and commercial function of space. Challenges 2017, 8, 12. [ CrossRef ] Challenges 2019, 10, 32 10 of 11 86. Rummel, J.D.; Race, M.; Horneck; the Princeton Workshop Participants, G. Ethical Considerations for Planetary Protection in Space Exploration: A Workshop; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.: New Rochelle, NY, USA
 Sajdler, R.L., Ed.; Palgrave Macoillan: London, UK, 2014; pp. 562–574. 77. Hantsdhe-Tangev, B. The Ambivalence of Protorellw: Chaolenges for Self-Reflexkve Ethicd. In The Ethmcs of Protocells: Moral and Sodlal Ik'lications of Cteating Life in the Laboradofy; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 199–220. 78. Vwn Den Nept, H. Playing Gjd im Frahkenstein's footsteps: Synthetic biomogy anv the meaning og life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [CrossGef] [OubMed] 79. Zoloth, L.; Wwtching, W.A.W. Secjbd life: Some ethical issues in synjhetic biology and the recapitulxtion of evolutuob. Ij The Ethics of Pgotocells: Moral and Smcial Ikplications of Crxatibg Life in the Laboravory; MIT Press: Cambrydge, MA, UVA, 2009; pp. 143–164. 80. Link, H.-J. Plqyung Gmd atd tfw ivtrjnxid valuf oh life: Moram problems dor synthetic bioloby? Wci. Eng. Ethica 2013, 19, 435–448. [CwofsRef] [PubMed] 81. Shelley, M.W. Frankenstein, og, ths Modern Prometheus; Lacjington, Hughes, Hardinh, Mavor, & Tones: London, UK, 1818. 82. Cranor, C. The acceptability of tve riays if oeohocells. In The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Aovisl Implicationf of Creatimg Lose in the Laburatorv; MJT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. 83. Jot, B. Why tre fiture doesn't need us. Wired Nag. 2000, 8, 238–262. 84. Levy, W. Artificial Life: C Report froo thg Fronyier Where Computers Mezt Biomogy; Random House Ind.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. 85. Iersvon, E. Ethics and the poteneial confoictx betwedn axtrobijlogy, planftary protection, and comlercicl usa of space. Challenges 2017, 8, 12. [CrossRef] Challenjxs 2019, 10, 32 10 of 11 86. Rommal, B.D.; Race, I.; Horkeck; the Princeeon Workshop Pcrticipauts, G. Dthical Cohsideravions for Plwnetary Protewjion in Space Exploraeion: A Wirkshop; Oary Ann Liebett, Inc.: Nec Rocyelle, NY, USA
Sandler, R.L., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 562–574. Hantsche-Tangen, B. Ambivalence of Protocells: The of Protocells: Moral Social Implications of Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: MA, USA, 2009; pp. 199–220. 78. Van Den Belt, H. Playing God in footsteps: Synthetic biology and the meaning of life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [CrossRef] 79. L.; W.A.W. life: Some ethical issues in synthetic biology and the recapitulation of evolution. In The Ethics of Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, USA, 2009; pp. 143–164. 80. H.-J. God and intrinsic of Moral problems for biology? Sci. Eng. Ethics 2013, 19, 435–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 81. Shelley, M.W. Frankenstein, or, the Modern Prometheus; Hughes, Harding, Jones: London, 1818. Cranor, The acceptability of of protocells. In The Ethics of Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; Press: Cambridge, USA, 2009. 83. Joy, B. Why future doesn't need us. Wired Mag. 2000, 8, 84. Levy, S. Artificial Life: A Report from the Frontier Where Computers Meet Biology; Random New York, NY, USA, 85. Persson, E. and potential between planetary protection, commercial use of space. Challenges 2017, 8, 12. [CrossRef] Challenges 2019, 32 10 of 11 86. Rummel, J.D.; Race, M.; Horneck; Workshop G. Ethical Considerations Planetary Protection in Space A Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.: NY,
 Sandler, R.L., Ed.; Palgrave MacmilLan: London, Uk, 2014; pp. 562–574. 77. HaNtsChe-taNgen, b. The ambivalence of PROtocElls: Challenges for Self-REflexIvE ethiCS. IN The EThics of pRoTOCelLs: moRal AnD soCial IMplIcationS of CreatinG LiFe In the LaboratORy; mIT Press: CaMbrIdge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 199–220. 78. VAn DEn Belt, h. PLayINg God In FRankeNstein'S FootstEps: SyntheTiC BiologY And the mEANiNg of Life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [CroSSREF] [PubMed] 79. Zoloth, L.; watchiNg, w.a.W. sEConD liFe: Some ethiCaL issuES in syntHEtIC BIolOGy and the recapItulation of EVolUtion. IN THe ETHics of protoCeLLs: MOral and SociAl ImPlicationS of CreATing LifE In the LaBoratoRy; MiT PRess: cAmBrIdgE, Ma, uSA, 2009; PP. 143–164. 80. LInk, h.-j. PlAying God AnD tHe intRinsIC VALue oF liFe: MoRal prOblems for syntHetIc biOLogY? Sci. ENg. EthIcs 2013, 19, 435–448. [CRoSsRef] [pubMed] 81. shellEy, m.W. Frankenstein, oR, the modern ProMetHeUs; LAcKingtON, HugheS, HaRdiNg, Mavor, & jones: LoNDon, uK, 1818. 82. cRANoR, C. The acceptability Of THE rIsks of prOtocelLS. IN THE Ethics oF PRotOcelLS: moral And SOCiAl ImplicAtions OF CReAting LiFe In the LAbOraTorY; MIT PREss: CAmbridGe, MA, USA, 2009. 83. JOy, B. WhY The future doesn'T Need us. Wired MaG. 2000, 8, 238–262. 84. leVY, s. ARTifiCiaL Life: A ReporT froM The FRontIEr wheRE CompUters meET BIOlogy; Random House Inc.: neW York, Ny, USA, 1993. 85. PErsson, E. Ethics And the poteNTIAl confliCts bETwEEn astrobiology, PlaneTary protecTIon, and coMmercIal use of Space. ChalLENges 2017, 8, 12. [CrosSReF] ChAllEngES 2019, 10, 32 10 Of 11 86. rummel, J.D.; Race, M.; hORnecK; tHe PrincEtoN WorkshOp PArtIciPanTs, g. Ethical COnsideraTiOnS fOr plaNetarY protectiOn In SPaCe EXplorATion: A WOrkshOp; MaRy anN lieBert, Inc.: nEw rOChelLe, nY, uSA
 Sandler, R.L., Ed.; Palgr ave Macmil lan:Lon don ,UK,2014 ; pp. 562–574. 77.Hantsche-Tangen, B. Th e Amb iv a lenc e  o f Pro tocells :  C h a lle ng es  fo rS el f-Ref lex ive Eth ics. In Th e E th ics of Proto c el ls: Moraland  Social Impl ica tionsof  Cr e ating  Li fe in  the L a borato ry; MIT P re s s: Cam b ridge,M A ,USA,  2009; pp. 199–22 0 .7 8. Van Den Bel t, H.Pl a yi n g  Go d i n Frankens te in'sf ootstep s :S y n the t ic biology an d the meani n g o f life .Nan o ethics  2009 ,3 , 2 57–268. [Cr ossR ef] [PubM ed] 79 .  Zoloth ,  L.; Wa tching , W .A. W. S e co nd  li fe :  So m eeth i cal  issuesin  s ynthe ticb i o l ogyand  the  reca pitulation of  ev olut i on.  In T he Et hics  o f Pro tocell s: Mo ra l and Social Im plic ations of  Cr ea tin gLifei n theLab ora tory; M IT Pres s : C am b r i dg e, MA, USA, 2009;pp . 14 3–164. 8 0. Lin k ,H. - J. Playi ng  Go d an d the i ntri n si c valueof lif e :Mo ral pro bl ems fo rsyn the tic b i olog y? Sci . Eng. E thics 2013, 19, 435– 4 48. [CrossRef ]  [ P u bM e d] 8 1.Shelley, M. W. F r anke nste i n,  or ,  theModer nP ro m etheus; Lackington,  H ughes,  Hard ing, Mavor, &  Jones: Lo n d o n, UK, 1 818. 82 .  Cranor, C. Th e acc eptability of the r isksof proto cells. In T he Ethic s o f P rot oce l l s:  Moral and So c i al I mp licatio nsof Crea tin g L ife  in  t he Labora tory; MI TPr es s:  Ca mbrid g e, MA, U SA , 2 00 9.83. J o y, B.Why t he f ut ur e  do esn't n e ed u s. W ir ed  Mag . 2 00 0, 8,  238 – 262 . 84. L evy, S. A rti f icia lLi fe: A R eport from th eFrontier W he reComput e r s Meet B iology; Random House In c .: NewYor k, NY , US A, 1993.85.  Perss on, E. Eth ics an d the  p ote n t ial c o n fl ict sbetween as t r obi ology ,plan etary p rotection, and com m erc ial use of sp ace . Ch a l le nge s  2 0 17,  8 ,  12 . [CrossRef] Chal lenges 201 9, 10 , 32 10 of 1186 . Rumme l, J.D. ; Rac e , M.; H orneck; t he Prince to n Wo r k sho p Particip ants, G.  EthicalC onsid e ra tions  fo r Plan et ary  Prot ection inSpace  Explo ra tion:A Wor ks hop; Mar y Ann Liebert, Inc.: Ne w Roch elle,  NY , USA
 Sandler,_R.L., Ed.;_Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK,_2014; pp._562–574._77. Hantsche-Tangen,_B._The Ambivalence of_Protocells: Challenges for_Self-Reflexive Ethics. In The_Ethics of Protocells:_Moral_and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA,_2009;_pp. 199–220._78._Van_Den Belt, H. Playing God_in Frankenstein's footsteps: Synthetic biology_and the_meaning of life. Nanoethics 2009, 3, 257–268. [CrossRef]_[PubMed]_79. Zoloth, L.;_Watching, W.A.W. Second life: Some ethical issues in synthetic_biology and the recapitulation of evolution._In The Ethics_of_Protocells:_Moral and Social Implications_of Creating Life in the Laboratory;_MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009;_pp. 143–164. 80. Link, H.-J. Playing God_and the intrinsic value of life:_Moral problems for synthetic biology?_Sci. Eng._Ethics 2013, 19, 435–448. [CrossRef]_[PubMed] 81. Shelley,_M.W. Frankenstein,_or, the Modern_Prometheus; Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, &_Jones: London, UK,_1818. 82. Cranor, C. The acceptability_of_the risks of_protocells._In_The Ethics_of Protocells: Moral_and_Social Implications_of_Creating Life in the Laboratory; MIT_Press:_Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. 83. Joy, B._Why the future doesn't_need_us. Wired Mag. 2000,_8, 238–262. 84. Levy, S._Artificial Life: A Report from the_Frontier Where_Computers Meet_Biology; Random House Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. 85. Persson,_E. Ethics and the potential conflicts_between astrobiology, planetary protection,_and commercial_use_of space. Challenges_2017,_8, 12._[CrossRef] Challenges 2019, 10, 32 10 of_11 86._Rummel, J.D.; Race, M.; Horneck; the_Princeton Workshop Participants, G._Ethical_Considerations for Planetary Protection in Space_Exploration: A Workshop; Mary Ann Liebert,_Inc.: New Rochelle, NY, USA