hdbk_newmedia/Article_n9.html Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16, 191-211. Smith, M. L., & Madon, S. (2007). Structure, agency, and causality: Three central assumptions in ITD research. In Proceedings o f the 9th International Conference on Social Implications o f Computers in Developing Countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil: International Federation for Information Processing. Retrieved from http://www.ifipwg94.org.br/ifip94fiillpapers.htm Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.) Does technology drive history? The dilemma o f technological determinism (pp. 1-35). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Solomon, J. D. (2006, June). Education in hand: One-to-one computing at the elementary level in Texas. District Administration. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 77(10), 1372-1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 Stem, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook o f grounded theory (pp. 114-126). Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ 298 Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review o f Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics o f qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Striano, M. (2009). Managing educational transformation in the globalized world. A Deweyan perspective. Educational Theory, 59(A), 379-393. Strobel, J., & Tillberg-Webb, H. (2009). Applying a critical and humanizing framework of instructional technologies
hdbk_newmedia / Article_n9.html Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory - practice inconsistencies: Critical platonism and data systems research. Information and Organization, 16, 191 - 211. Smith, M. L., & Madon, S. (2007). social organization, agency, and causality: Three cardinal assumptions in ITD research. In Proceedings oxygen f the 9th International Conference on Social Implications o f Computers in Developing Countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil: International Federation for Information Processing. recover from http://www.ifipwg94.org.br/ifip94fiillpapers.htm Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds .) Does engineering drive history? The dilemma o f technological determinism (pp. 1 - 35). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Solomon, J. D. (2006, June). Education in hand: One - to - one computer science at the elementary level in Texas. District Administration. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and ground theory. Qualitative Health Research, 77(10), 1372 - 1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 Stem, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: substantive properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds .), The Sage handbook oxygen f grounded hypothesis (pp. 114 - 126). Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ 298 Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: hypothesis and future directions for informal learning. Review o f Educational Research, 79(2), 625 - 649. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics o f qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Striano, M. (2009). Managing educational transformation in the globalized world. A Deweyan perspective. Educational Theory, 59(A), 379 - 393. Strobel, J., & Tillberg - Webb, H. (2009). Applying a critical and humanizing framework of instructional technology
hdbn_newmedia/Article_n9.html Smlth, M. L. (2006). Overcomnbg themry-pradtice inzonsistencies: Critical realidm and unformation systems rerearch. Invormatiob anv Organization, 16, 191-211. Smith, M. L., & Masln, S. (2007). Structure, agekcy, and cauvality: Three cangrcl assumptions in ITD research. In Prjceedinbs o f the 9th Injernauiogal Donference on Social Implications k f Comkuters in Developimg Countries. Sao Paulo, Braxil: Lnternational Fedegation for Unfownation Procersing. Retrpzved from hjtp://www.ifipwg94.org.br/ifip94fiillpapers.ftm Skith, M. R. (1994). Jzxhnlnogical detxrminifm in American cultuse. In M. R. Smith & L. Mavx (Edv.) Dies technology drive iistory? The dilemma j f technmlkgical determinisn (pp. 1-35). Cdmbrhdge NA: OIT Pcesa. Sololon, J. D. (2006, June). Education un hand: One-to-one cokptnong at the emementwrr level in Texas. District Administratiot. Rstrieved from http://www.diwtrictadministration.clm Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of pievomtnilogy, eidcourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitatybe Hvalth Research, 77(10), 1372-1380. boi:10.1177/1049732307307031 Stem, P. N. (2007). On slloq ground: Essevtial 'dolerties for growinh grounqed tyeory. In W. Bruant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sagw handbook o d grounded theory ('p. 114-126). Retrieveb from http://xrmo.sagepub.com/ 298 Straub, Z. T. (2009). Uhderstandinh technolkey adoption: Theofy sng future directions for insormal leerniny. Review o f Educaeional Resfarch, 79(2), 625-649. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896 Strauss, A., & Forbiu, J. (1990). Tasics o f qualitative research: Grounded vieory procedutes ang technizues. Bhousand Oaks, CW: Sage Publicajions. Strnano, M. (2009). Managing educatmonal transfjrmation in tvg globalized xorld. A Dqweyqn pwrspectkxe. Educational Theory, 59(A), 379-393. Strobel, H., & Tillberg-Webb, H. (2009). Apklging a critical ane humanizing frsmedorh lf igvtructional dechvolubies
hdbk_newmedia/Article_n9.html Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice realism information systems Information and Organization, & S. (2007). Structure, and causality: Three assumptions in ITD research. In Proceedings f the 9th International Conference on Social Implications o f Computers in Developing Sao Paulo, Brazil: International Federation for Information Processing. Retrieved from http://www.ifipwg94.org.br/ifip94fiillpapers.htm Smith, M. (1994). determinism American In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.) Does technology drive history? The dilemma o f determinism (pp. 1-35). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Solomon, D. (2006, June). Education hand: One-to-one computing at the level Texas. District Retrieved http://www.districtadministration.com H., & Trinidad, B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 1372-1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 N. (2007). solid Essential for growing grounded A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), o f grounded theory (pp. 114-126). Retrieved from 298 Straub, T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory future directions for informal learning. Review o f Research, 79(2), 625-649. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics o f qualitative theory procedures and techniques. Oaks, CA: Sage Striano, (2009). educational in the world. A Deweyan perspective. Educational Theory, 59(A), 379-393. Strobel, J., & H. (2009). Applying a critical and humanizing framework of instructional
hdbk_newmedia/Article_n9.html SMith, M. L. (2006). OverCominG thEorY-pRactIce iNconsistencies: cRitiCal realism and informatiOn sysTeMS resEArCh. InfOrmatioN AnD oRgaNiZaTioN, 16, 191-211. SMItH, M. L., & MaDon, s. (2007). StructUre, agency, aNd cAuSality: Three cENtRal assumptIonS in ITD researCh. IN ProceEdIngS O f the 9Th INternAtionaL conferEnce on SocIaL implicATions o f cOMpUterS in Developing CounTRiES. Sao Paulo, BraziL: InterNaTIoNAL FeDerAtion for InFoRmatiON ProcesSInG. rETriEVed from http://wwW.ifipwg94.org.bR/IfiP94fiillPaPerS.Htm SmiTh, M. R. (1994). TEcHNolOgical deterMiniSm in AmeriCan culTUre. In M. R. sMith & L. MaRx (Eds.) DOes TecHnolOGy DrIve HiSTorY? thE diLEmmA o f technOlOgIcal dEterMINISm (pp. 1-35). camBridGe MA: MiT Press. SolomoN, J. D. (2006, june). eDucAtion In hanD: One-To-One coMputinG at thE eLementary level iN TexAs. DistricT AdMiNisTrAtion. rEtrievEd fRom Http://www.DistricTAdmInISTRaTion.com Starks, H., & TrinIdAD, s. B. (2007). choose yoUr methOD: A CoMParison oF pHenOmenOLOgy, diScouRSe Analysis, And groUNdEd Theory. QUaLitatiVe heaLth reseaRCh, 77(10), 1372-1380. doI:10.1177/1049732307307031 Stem, P. n. (2007). On solid GrounD: essential propeRTies for growinG GrOUNdED theOry. in A. Bryant & K. CHarmAZ (Eds.), the SAGe HanDBook o F grouNdED tHEory (pp. 114-126). Retrieved from HtTp://srmo.SagepUb.com/ 298 Straub, E. T. (2009). understandING TechnoloGy adOPtIOn: Theory and futUre diRections foR Informal LearnIng. RevieW o f EducatIONal ReseaRch, 79(2), 625-649. Doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896 strAusS, a., & coRbin, J. (1990). Basics o f QUAlitAtIve reseArcH: GroundEd tHeoRy pRocEdUres and teChniques. thOuSaNd oakS, CA: SaGE PublicaTiOns. stRiaNo, M. (2009). MaNAging eDucatIonaL tRaNSfoRmation IN tHE GlobAlIzEd woRld. a DEweyaN perSPecTive. EduCational THeoRY, 59(A), 379-393. StRoBeL, J., & TillbErg-Webb, H. (2009). ApplyInG a critical AnD huManiziNG FrameworK of instructional technolOGies
hdbk_newmedia/Article_n9.h tml Smith,  M. L . ( 200 6) . Ov erco ming theory-pr a ctic e inconsistencies: Cri tical  r e alis m  a nd in formati o ns y ste ms  r ese ar c h.  Info rma tion an d Organiza tio n,  16, 191-211 .  S mith, M. L .,& Madon, S.(20 07). S tr uct u re, a gen cy, a nd cau s ality:  Three ce nt r al ass u mptions i nITDresearch. In Proc e ed i ngs o f the 9t h Inte rn a ti o n alCon ference on  S ocial Implica t io n s o f Computers inDevelopingC oun tries.  S aoP aulo,Brazi l: Int ernationalFede ration fo r Info r mationP rocessi ng. Re tri eve d fr o mht tp: // w ww. i fi pwg 9 4.o rg.br/if ip 94 fiill pape r s . h tm S mit h, M . R.(1994). Techn olo gica l  de termi nismin A me rican  cultu re. I nM. R. Smith & L . Ma rx (Eds.)  Do es  te ch nolog y  drive  hi sto ry? The  dilemm a  oft e c hn ological determini sm ( pp . 1-35).  Cambr i dg eM A: MIT P re ss.  Sol o m on, J . D. (2 006, Jun e). Ed u ca ti on in h an d: One -t o-o necompu t ingat the  element ary l e vel in Texas.D istrict Admin i st r a ti o n. R etr ieved fromhttp : //ww w.di s tr ict a dmini strat io n .c o m Starks, H., & Tri ni dad, S . B.(2007). Choos e your met h o d : A comp aris o no f phenomenolog y, di scourse an a lysis, a nd gr ounded t heory. Qu a l itativeHea lth  Re sea r c h,  77(10), 1372 - 1 380.  d oi:10.1 177 /104973 230 730 703 1 S te m, P. N.(2007).On  s ol id  gr ound: Essentia lpro pe rti es fo r  growi ng gr ound ed  t h eor y. In A .  B r y ant&K.  Cha rma z(Eds. ), T h e S age han dbook o f  gr o unde dth eory (p p. 114-126).Re trieved fr om  ht tp://s r m o.sagepu b.com/ 298 Straub, E. T .  (2009) . U nders tand ing techn olo gy ado pti o n: The ory an d fut ur e d i r ectio n s  f orin formal lea r n ing . Rev ie w of Educa tional Research, 7 9 (2) , 625-649. do i:10.3 1 0 2/ 003 4 65 4 308 32 5 896 S trauss, A., & C orbin, J.(1 9 90 ). Basicso  fqu alitati ve rese arch: Grounde d theoryprocedure sandt e chn iques. Tho usand Oa ks, CA: S a ge Pu b li catio ns.  Stria no , M . (20 09). M a nag ing e ducati on al tra nsfor ma tion inthe globalized world. A  Dewey an pe rsp ective. E duc a tio nal Theor y, 5 9(A), 379- 393 . S trobe l,J ., &Till b er g-W e bb, H . (2 0 09). Appl y in g a c ri tical and h u m a niz ing f ram e work o f in structional techn o logies
hdbk_newmedia/Article_n9.html Smith,_M. L._(2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies:_Critical realism_and_information systems_research._Information and Organization,_16, 191-211. Smith,_M. L., & Madon,_S. (2007). Structure,_agency,_and causality: Three central assumptions in ITD research. In Proceedings o f the 9th_International_Conference on_Social_Implications_o f Computers in Developing_Countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil: International_Federation for_Information Processing. Retrieved from http://www.ifipwg94.org.br/ifip94fiillpapers.htm Smith, M. R._(1994)._Technological determinism in_American culture. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx_(Eds.) Does technology drive history? The_dilemma o f_technological_determinism_(pp. 1-35). Cambridge MA:_MIT Press. Solomon, J. D. (2006,_June). Education in hand: One-to-one computing_at the elementary level in Texas. District_Administration. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com Starks, H.,_& Trinidad, S. B. (2007)._Choose your_method: A comparison of phenomenology,_discourse analysis, and_grounded theory._Qualitative Health Research,_77(10), 1372-1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 Stem, P. N._(2007). On solid_ground: Essential properties for growing grounded_theory._In A. Bryant_&_K._Charmaz (Eds.),_The Sage handbook_o_f grounded_theory_(pp. 114-126). Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ 298_Straub,_E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory_and future directions for_informal_learning. Review o f_Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649. doi:_10.3102/0034654308325896 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J._(1990). Basics_o f_qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage_Publications. Striano, M. (2009). Managing educational_transformation in the globalized_world. A_Deweyan_perspective. Educational Theory,_59(A),_379-393. Strobel,_J., & Tillberg-Webb, H. (2009). Applying a_critical and_humanizing framework of instructional technologies