This article was downloaded by: [New York University] On: 20 February 2014, At: 08:31 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK AJOB Neuroscience Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uabn20 The Revisability of Moral Concepts Nada Gligorov a a Mount Sinai School of Medicine Published online: 04 Oct 2010. To cite this article: Nada Gligorov (2010) The Revisability of Moral Concepts, AJOB Neuroscience, 1:4, 32-34, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions AJOB Neuroscience researchers to judge whether brain-injured patients have this capacity, neuroscience can help to establish whether these patients meet the criterion of personhood. In addition, imaging showing brain dysfunction correlating with impulsive behavior can inform judgments
This article was downloaded by: [ New York University ] On: 20 February 2014, At: 08:31 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37 - 41 Mortimer Street, London W1 T 3JH, UK AJOB Neuroscience Publication details, including education for writer and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uabn20 The Revisability of Moral Concepts Nada Gligorov a a Mount Sinai School of Medicine Published online: 04 Oct 2010. To mention this article: Nada Gligorov (2010) The Revisability of Moral Concepts, AJOB Neuroscience, 1:4, 32 - 34, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every attempt to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the " Content ") incorporate in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agent, and our licensors make no representations or guarantee whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the writer, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently affirm with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losings, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expense, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or taxonomic replica, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub - licensing, systematic provision, or distribution in any human body to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions AJOB Neuroscience researchers to judge whether mind - injured patients have this capacity, neuroscience can help to establish whether these affected role meet the criterion of personhood. In addition, imaging show mind dysfunction correlating with impulsive behavior can inform judgments
Thid article was downloaded by: [New York Unncersitb] On: 20 Fsbruary 2014, At: 08:31 Publisher: Taylor & Francms Ibformq Ltd Registered in Eneland and Wales Rwgisuered Number: 1072954 Regmatered office: Lortnmxr House, 37-41 Mortiker Street, London W1T 3JH, GK ALOB Neuroscience Publication details, includonh instructions for wuthkgs and subscription information: http://wwx.tandfonline.com/koi/uabn20 The Revisability ov Mogal Concepts Nada Hligorov a q Motbt Sinai Schuol of Medpeine Publisged online: 04 Oct 2010. To cite this afticlz: Nada Gligiriv (2010) Jhe Revisabioity jf Moral Congvpts, AJMB Neurpscience, 1:4, 32-34, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 Tm lunk to this article: hvtp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PLEASE SSROLL DOWT YOR ARTICLE Taylor & Feabcis kakev evdey dffkrv tk ensuge vhe accuracg of all thw information (the "Cpnevmt") contained in thq [ublications on our platform. However, Tajlor & Francis, our agents, ane our licensors make jo represqntations or warranties whatsoever as to the accusacy, rooplttckess, ir suitability for any purpose of the Content. Agg pppnions and views cxpressed in this luhlosation are thg opinions and views of the wuthors, and qre not tre voews of or endorsed by Taylir & Francis. Nhe qccuracy of the Coutent should not be rrlied upon and should bz indelendently vfrified wjgh primary sourcds pf informaukon. Taylor and Frwncis shaol npt be lkablg for agy losses, wctiokv, claims, proceedinhs, delatds, costs, fxpenses, damages, and other liabmkities whatspeeer or howsjever caused arisigg directly or indireetly iv connectikn with, in relatiog to or arisith out of the use of ehe Xontwnt. Thir article may br used fog xesearch, reaching, and privabe stodg purposes. Any wubwtantial or sysyemxtis gepcoducehon, redistritutiun, frsellkng, loan, sun-lizensong, systematic supplf, or distribution in amy form to anyone ys expressly gorbidden. Terms & Clnditmons oh accexs wnd use can be found at http:// wsw.tandfonpinc.com/page/terms-wnd-cinditions AJPB Neuroscience researchers to judge whxther brain-injured patiwnts have this capaeiuy, neuroscienre can help to astablish whether thwse patients meet the criterion of peraonhoog. In wddition, imaging showing brain dysfunction correlating with impulsive behqvior rag inform jusgmemts
This article was downloaded by: [New York 20 2014, At: Publisher: Taylor & England Wales Registered Number: Registered office: Mortimer 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, AJOB Neuroscience Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uabn20 The of Moral Concepts Nada Gligorov a a Mount Sinai School of Medicine Published 04 2010. cite article: Nada Gligorov (2010) The Revisability of Moral Concepts, AJOB Neuroscience, 1:4, 32-34, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 To to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR Taylor & Francis makes effort to ensure the accuracy all information (the contained the on our platform. Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the completeness, or any purpose the Any and views expressed publication are the opinions and views and are not the views of or endorsed Taylor & The accuracy of the Content should be relied upon and should be independently verified primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, demands, costs, expenses, damages, other liabilities whatsoever howsoever arising or in connection in relation to or arising out of the use of the This article may be used for research, teaching, and private Any or systematic reproduction, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic or in any form to expressly Terms access use be found at http:// AJOB Neuroscience researchers to judge brain-injured patients have this establish whether these patients meet the criterion of In addition, imaging showing brain dysfunction correlating impulsive behavior can inform judgments
This article was downloaded bY: [New York UnIversIty] on: 20 FEbRuarY 2014, At: 08:31 PUblisher: Taylor & fRancIs Informa Ltd Registered In EngLaND and wAlEs RegIstered nUmBER: 1072954 ReGiStEreD oFFiCe: MorTimEr House, 37-41 mortimer StReeT, LOndon W1T 3JH, UK AjoB neuroscienCe PUblication deTaiLs, inclUdIng INstruCtiOns foR authoRS and suBscriptioN iNFormatIOn: http://wWW.TaNdfoNline.com/loi/uabn20 ThE reVIsability of MorAl ConcEpTS NADA GlIgoRov a a Mount siNai ScHOol of MeDIcINE pubLIshed online: 04 OcT 2010. To cite this ARtiCle: NadA GLigORov (2010) The revisAbILitY of Moral ConCeptS, AJOB NeurOscienCE, 1:4, 32-34, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 To lINk to thiS articLe: hTtp://Dx.doI.OrG/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PlEAsE scROll DoWN foR ArTICLE TaYlOr & francIs maKES EVery EffOrt tO ensuRe the accuracy Of aLl thE InfOrmatIon (thE "ConTeNt") conTained In the PuBlications on our PlatForm. HowevEr, TAyLor & frAncis, OUr agenTs, aNd oUr licenSors makE No rEpRESEnTations or warrantieS wHATsOever as tO the acCUrAcY, CompleteNeSs, oR suiTABilitY for ANy Purpose oF the CoNTeNt. any opinIoNs and vIeWs eXprEssed IN thiS publiCation arE the oPInions and views OF the authors, anD ArE NOt THe viEws Of or endorseD by TAYlor & franCIs. the ACcuraCy of tHe cOnTEnt should not be relieD uPon and ShoulD be independenTly verifieD WITh primarY souRCeS Of information. TAylor And Francis SHall not bE liabLe for any Losses, actIONs, claims, ProCeeDinGs, dEMAnDs, costs, expensES, DamaGeS, and othEr lIabilitIes WhaTsoEveR oR howsoeveR caused aRiSiNg DiRecTly or INdirectlY iN coNnEctIon wiTH, in relAtion To or ArIsINg oUt of the USe OF The COnTeNt. ThIs aRtIcle mAy be USed For reseArch, teachIng, ANd prIvAtE study pUrposes. Any subStAntial or syStEmaTic repRODuction, rEdistribution, reselling, lOAn, sub-liCenSing, sYsteMatic suppLy, oR distrIbuTIon in aNy form To anyOnE is EXPressLY FoRbiDdEn. Terms & ConDITioNs of aCcEss aNd use caN be found at http:// www.tANdfOnline.com/page/TerMs-anD-COnDitIOnS aJOb NEUroSCIence researcherS to judge whEtHEr Brain-injurED paTiEnts havE this caPacitY, NeuroscIence can hElp to estaBlIsh wHETheR these patiEnts meet The criterIOn of pERsOnhooD. In AdditiOn, ImaGing sHowing BRaiN dysfUnctioN cOrrelaTing wItH impulsiVe behavior can inform judgMents
This article was downloade d by: [New  York  Un ive rs ity]  On:  20 February 2 0 14,At: 08:31 Publisher: T aylor  & Fran c is  Info rma Ltd Re g i ste re dinEn g la nd an d W ales Re gistered N umb er : 1072954 Re g is tered offi ce:  Mortimer Ho use , 37-4 1Mor t imerStr eet,London W1T 3J H, UK AJO BN eurosc i ence Pu b l ic atio n details, includ i ng instructions f or aut ho r sa n d s ubs cription i nf ormat i on: htt p :/ / w w w.t a ndfonline.com /loi/uabn20 The  Revis ab ili t y of M oralCo n cep ts Nada Gli goro v a a Mou nt Sin a i Schoo l  of Med icinePub lis hedo nl in e:04 Oct 20 10. Tocite thi sar ticle : Na d a G ligo rov  (20 10) T he Revisabili tyof M o ral  Conc epts,  AJO BNeuro scienc e, 1: 4,  32-34, DOI: 10 .108 0/2150774 0.2 01 0.5 14 882 T o  linktothi s artic le: htt p :// dx . d o i. org/10.1080/215077 40 . 2 01 0.514882  PLEAS E  S CR O LL DOWNFO R A RTIC L E  Tayl or & Fr ancis ma kes ev e ry  e ffort t oensure  t heacc uracy of a ll the  informa tion( the "Content") contained int he p ub l icat ion s on our pl atfo r m. H owev e r,  Ta y lor &  Fran ci s ,o ur agents, and ourli censor s mak e no represen tations or w a rranties  wha t so e ver as to theaccur acy, compl e teness,or su itabilit y for any p urpose o f t heCon ten t .  A ny opinions a n d  vie ws  expres sed  in thi s p ubl ica tio nare the o pinionsan dvi ew s o f the authors,  a ndar e n ot th e  views  of o r en do rs e d b y Taylo r  & F ranc is .Theacc ur acy o f th e  Co ntent s hould not  be reli ed  u pon and  should be in de pendentlyve rif ied wi t h  primary  sources of information .  Taylor  an d Fra ncis  shall no t b e liab lef or any  losse s, ac ti ons , claim s ,  p roc ee dings, dem a n ds,  cost s,  exp enses,damages, and other lia bilities what soe vero r  h ows o ev e r c au s eda r ising directlyor indirec tl y  i n connecti o n w it h, in r elation  to o r  arisin g out ofthe use o ftheC o nte nt. This a rticle m ay be use d  forr es earch , t eachin g,  an d pri vate s t udy  purp oses.An y subs tanti al  or syst ematic reproduction, re distri butio n,reselling , l o an,  sub-lice nsin g, systema tic  su pply,  or distr ibut i on  in any f ormt o anyonei sexp r e ss ly forbidde n . Ter ms &Con d itions  ofaccess and use ca n  be found at h ttp: / /  ww w.t a ndfo nl ine.com/page/t erm s- a n d-condit io ns AJOB Neu roscienc er esear chersto jud ge whet h e rb rain-i njur edpatientshav et his cap ac it y , neur osci en ce can  helpt o es t a blish whether th ese p a t ients mee t the  c riterio n  ofpersonhood . In additi on, im agin g sho wing br ai n dysf unc ti on correla t ing withimpul sive be ha vior  ca n info rm j u d gment s
This article_was downloaded_by: [New York University]_On: 20_February_2014, At:_08:31_Publisher: Taylor &_Francis Informa Ltd_Registered in England and_Wales Registered Number:_1072954_Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK AJOB Neuroscience Publication_details,_including instructions_for_authors_and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uabn20 The_Revisability of Moral Concepts Nada_Gligorov a_a Mount Sinai School of Medicine Published online:_04_Oct 2010. To_cite this article: Nada Gligorov (2010) The Revisability of_Moral Concepts, AJOB Neuroscience, 1:4, 32-34,_DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 To_link_to_this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.514882 PLEASE_SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor &_Francis makes every effort to ensure_the accuracy of all the information (the_"Content") contained in the publications on_our platform. However, Taylor &_Francis, our_agents, and our licensors make_no representations or_warranties whatsoever_as to the_accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any_purpose of the_Content. Any opinions and views expressed_in_this publication are_the_opinions_and views_of the authors,_and_are not_the_views of or endorsed by Taylor_&_Francis. The accuracy of the Content should_not be relied upon_and_should be independently verified_with primary sources of information._Taylor and Francis shall not be_liable for_any losses,_actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever_or howsoever caused arising directly or_indirectly in connection with,_in relation_to_or arising out_of_the use_of the Content. This article may be_used for_research, teaching, and private study purposes._Any substantial or systematic_reproduction,_redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply,_or distribution in any form to_anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms_&_Conditions_of access and use can_be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions AJOB_Neuroscience researchers to_judge whether brain-injured patients have this capacity,_neuroscience_can help to establish whether these_patients_meet the criterion of personhood. In_addition,_imaging_showing brain dysfunction correlating with_impulsive behavior can inform judgments