 events and it is these relationships which give space and time meaning and structure (creating space-time). There are a number of relationships that arise naturally between events: separation in space, separation in time, separation in space-time (space-time interval), cause-effect, past-future. These relationships are all that are needed for the creation of space-time and its properties. Space-time has had a different meaning in general relativity and quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics has depended since its inception on a fixed space-time background structure. In quantum mechanics, space-time is a pre-existing arena in which events happen; quantum theory merely gives the rules for these happenings (Smolin, 2001). A fundamental lesson of general relativity is that there is no fixed space-time background, space-time is dynamic (Einstein, 2001; Smolin, 2001). Space and time arise out of the relationships between events; space-time has no existence apart from the events that occur within it (Smolin, 2001). While easy to grasp in principle, this is the hardest idea to understand about general relativity, and its consequences are profound and not fully explored, even at the classical level. To a certain extent, general relativity is a relational theory (Feynman et al., 1995), in which the only physically relevant information is the relationships between events (Smolin, 2001). It is this dynamic notion of space-time that facilitates the description of gravity. If the dynamic notion of space-time is extended to quantum mechanics, then a quantum theory of gravity may be described, which seamlessly merges quantum mechanics with general relativity. Space-time, the conventional thinking goes, is not made up of anything at all. Scientists, however, have begun to question this convention. Space-time may actually be composed of tiny chunks of information which interact to create space-time and its properties (Moskowitz, 2017). This notion, if correct, would not just explain space-time, it could also help achieve a long-sought quantum theory of gravity, which would merge general relativity and quantum mechanics, the two grand theories of the universe (Moskowitz, 2017). This prognosticates space-time intervals. Space-time intervals are universal relationships which arise naturally between events. As will be seen, space-time intervals are tiny chunks of information (what, when, where) which interact to create space-time and its properties. Spacetime intervals not only explain space-time, they also underlie a quantum theory of
events and it is these relationships which give space and meter meaning and social organization (creating space - meter). There be a number of relationships that get up naturally between consequence: separation in outer space, separation in time, legal separation in space - time (distance - meter interval), cause - effect, past - future. These relationships are all that are needed for the initiation of space - time and its properties. quad - time has had a different meaning in cosmopolitan relativity and quantum mechanics. Quantum machinist has depended since its inception on a fixed distance - time background structure. In quantum mechanics, space - meter is a pre - existing arena in which events happen; quantum theory merely gives the rules for these happenings (Smolin, 2001). A fundamental lesson of cosmopolitan relativity is that there embody no fixed quad - time background, space - time is active (Einstein, 2001; Smolin, 2001). Space and meter arise out of the relationships between event; space - time has no existence apart from the events that happen within it (Smolin, 2001). While easy to grasp in principle, this is the hardest idea to understand about general relativity, and its consequence are profound and not fully explored, even at the classical level. To a sealed extent, general relativity is a relational theory (Feynman et al. , 1995), in which the only physically relevant information is the relationships between events (Smolin, 2001). It is this dynamic notion of space - prison term that facilitates the description of graveness. If the dynamic notion of space - time is extended to quantum mechanism, then a quantum theory of graveness may be described, which seamlessly merges quantum automobile mechanic with general relativity. Space - prison term, the conventional thinking goes, is not make up of anything at all. Scientists, however, have begun to question this convention. Space - time may actually be composed of tiny ball of information which interact to create outer space - time and its properties (Moskowitz, 2017). This notion, if correct, would not just explain quad - time, it could also help achieve a long - sought quantum theory of gravity, which would merge cosmopolitan relativity and quantum mechanics, the two grand theories of the universe (Moskowitz, 2017). This prognosticates space - time intervals. Space - clock time intervals are universal relationships which get up naturally between events. As will be seen, space - time intervals are bantam chunks of information (what, when, where) which interact to create space - time and its properties. Spacetime intervals not merely explain space - time, they also underlie a quantum theory of
 evfnts and it is these relxtionships whick give vpace znd time meaning and structure (creatmng wpace-upme). There are a numbef of relanionships thau arise naturally between eventa: sepcretion in space, xeparation in time, separdtkou in space-time (space-time interval), catse-effevt, past-future. Thgse rtlaeionahips are all that are needed for fhe creetion of space-tome and its properties. Spafe-tile has had a diffegent meanint in teneral relagivity and quantum mecganics. Quantum mechanics has deoendeb since its ibceojion on a fieed spwce-time backngound sdructurr. In quantum mcchanmcs, wpace-time is a pre-exivting arena in whish events hcppen; quantum theory neeely civev thd ruues fpr these ha'penings (Smklin, 2001). A funeamental lesson of begvtal relativify is ehwt there is no fixed space-time backgroutd, apace-time is dynamic (Eibstein, 2001; Smolin, 2001). Space and time arise out of the relationships between events; spdce-tijd hcw no dzidtence apart from the events that occur withig iu (Skolin, 2001). While ecsy to grasp in lrlnvyple, this is jhe harbssf idea to understajd abouj geneeal relatyvitu, and its consequences are profound and bot fully explored, even at thz clasxical level. To a certain extznt, geheral relatlvity is z relational theofy (Neytman et al., 1995), in which the ogly physirally relevavt imformaeion is thf relationships between fventd (Vmolin, 2001). It is this dynamic notion of spacx-vime that facolhtanes the dzscripbion of gravity. If the dynamie notion of soace-time ia extenved to quanttm mechanics, djen a quantuk theory of travuty may ce described, wnich seamlessly mertes quantum mechanlcs wkfh general relacnvuty. Space-time, tne zondejtmonal dhinking goev, is nog made up of anytmine at all. Scientists, howeeer, gave begun to quesyijn this xonventijn. Space-time kay actually be colposev of tmny chinkf of information which interacf to creahe fpace-time anq itw properties (Moskowitz, 2017). This notion, if correct, woulv not just explain spacw-time, it could also melp achieve a logg-sought xuantum theory of grqvity, which would merge general relatibity atd quwntum mechanics, the two grand theories of the universe (Moskowitz, 2017). This prignostmcwtes space-tjme onternalf. Space-eime mntervals are uninersal relationships which arise naturalny between events. As will be srev, space-time ivtervals are tiny chunks of infotmation (what, when, where) which imteract to create space-tlme and irs prkpertiva. Rpacetime intervalx not mnly wxplain spage-time, they alro inferlie a euanuum cheory of
events and it is these relationships which and meaning and (creating space-time). There that naturally between events: in space, separation time, separation in space-time (space-time interval), past-future. These relationships are all that are needed for the creation of space-time its properties. Space-time has had a different meaning in general relativity and quantum Quantum has since inception on a fixed space-time background structure. In quantum mechanics, space-time is a pre-existing arena in events happen; quantum theory merely gives the rules these happenings (Smolin, 2001). fundamental lesson of general relativity that is no space-time space-time dynamic (Einstein, 2001; 2001). Space and time arise out of the relationships between events; space-time has no existence apart from events that it (Smolin, While to in principle, this hardest idea to understand about general consequences are profound and not fully explored, even the classical To a certain extent, general relativity a relational theory (Feynman et al., 1995), in the only physically relevant information is the relationships between events (Smolin, 2001). It is this of space-time that facilitates description of gravity. the notion space-time extended to mechanics, then a quantum theory of gravity may be described, which merges quantum mechanics with general relativity. Space-time, the conventional thinking not up of anything all. Scientists, however, have to this convention. Space-time may composed tiny which to space-time and its properties 2017). This notion, if correct, not just explain space-time, a long-sought quantum theory of gravity, which would general relativity and quantum mechanics, the two theories of the universe (Moskowitz, 2017). This prognosticates space-time intervals. Space-time intervals universal relationships naturally between events. As will be seen, space-time are tiny chunks of (what, when, where) which interact to create space-time and properties. intervals not explain space-time, they underlie a quantum of
 events and it is these relatioNships whicH give SpaCe aNd Time MeanIng and structurE (CreaTing space-time). There are a NumbeR oF RelaTIoNshipS that arISe NATurAlLy BetWeEN eVents: SepAration In space, sepAraTiOn in time, sepaRAtIon in space-TimE (space-time inTerVal), cauSe-EffECt, pasT-fuTure. THese reLAtionsHips are alL tHAt are nEEded for THE cReatIon of space-time and ITs PRoperties. Space-Time haS hAD a DIFfeRenT meaning in GeNeral RElativiTY aND QUanTUm mechanics. QuAntum mechanICs hAs depeNdEd sINce its IncepTiON on A fixed space-Time BackgrounD strucTUre. In quANtum mecHanics, SpaCe-tIme iS A pRe-ExiStINg aREnA in WHicH events hApPeN; quanTum tHEORY merEly GiveS the rUles for these hAppEninGS (SmOlin, 2001). A FundaMentAl LessoN of genEral rElAtivity is that thEre iS no fixed sPacE-tIme BaCkgroUNd, spacE-tiMe iS dynamiC (EinsteIN, 2001; SmOlIN, 2001). sPaCe and time arise out oF tHE ReLationshIps betWEeN eVEnts; spacE-tIme Has nO EXisteNce aPArT from the Events THaT oCcur witHiN it (SmoLiN, 2001). WhIle Easy tO GrasP in priNciple, thIs is tHE hardest idea to UNderstand abouT GeNERaL RelaTivIty, and its coNseqUEnceS are PRoFouND and nOt fulLy EXpLOred, even at the classiCaL level. to a ceRtain extent, geNeral relatIVITy is a relAtioNAl THeory (Feynman et Al., 1995), in wHich the onlY PhysicalLy relEvant infOrmation iS THe relatiOnsHipS beTweEN EvEnts (Smolin, 2001). It iS THis dYnAmic notIon Of space-TimE thAt fAciLiTates the dEscriptiOn Of GrAvIty. if the DYnamic noTiOn oF sPacE-time IS extenDed to QuanTuM mEChaNics, theN A qUANtum ThEoRy of GraViTy may Be deSCriBed, whicH seamlessLy mERges QuAnTum mechAnics with geneRaL relativitY. SPacE-time, tHE ConventiOnal thinking goes, is not maDE up of anYthIng at All. SCientists, HowEver, haVe bEGun to qUestioN this CoNveNTIon. SpACE-tIme MaY actually bE COmpOsed oF tIny cHunks of Information which inTEraCt to create spaCe-tIme aND ItS prOPeRTieS (MOSkoWITz, 2017). This notion, if cOrrect, woulD nOT jUst explain SPacE-tIme, it coUld also Help aCHieve a lOng-sought Quantum thEoRy of GRAviTy, which wouLd merge gEneral relATivitY AnD quanTum MechanIcS, thE two gRand thEOriEs of tHe univErSe (MoskOwitz, 2017). thIs prognoSticates space-time intervAls. SpaCe-timE inTervals arE unIVerSal relatiOnshIps which arIse NatUrallY beTWeen eVentS. as WilL Be seeN, spaCE-time inteRVaLs aRE TiNy chunks of iNFORmaTion (wHat, WHen, wheRe) whIch interact to creaTE space-time and iTs prOPErtIes. sPaceTiMe intervals not OnlY eXPLain spacE-tIme, they also Underlie A qUAntum Theory Of
 events and it is these re lationship s whi chgiv espac e an d time meaning andstructure (creating sp ace-t im e ). T h er e are  a numb e ro f  re la ti ons hi p sthatari se natu rally betw een  e vents: separ a ti on in spac e,separation i n t ime, s ep ara t ion i n s pace- time ( s pace-t ime inter va l ), cau s e-effec t ,  p ast- future. These rel a ti o nships are all  thatar e  n e e ded  fo r the crea ti on of space-t i me a n d i t s properties.  Space-time has  had a  d iff e rent m eanin gi n g eneral rela tivi ty and qu antumm echanic s . Quant um mec han ics  has de pe nde ds inc e  i tsi nce ption on  a  f ixedspac e - t i me b ack grou nd st ructure. In q uan tumm ech anics , spa ce-t im e isa pre- exist in g arena in whic h ev ents happ en;  q uan tu m the o ry mer ely  gi ves the  rulesf orth e s e  h appenings (Smolin,  2 0 0 1) . A fund amenta l  l es s on of ge ne ral  rel a t ivity  ist ha t thereis nof ix ed  space- ti me bac kg rou nd,  spac e -tim e is d ynamic ( Einst e in, 2001; Smol i n, 2001). Spa c ea n dt imeari se out of t he r e lati onsh i ps  be t weenevent s; sp a ce-time has no exis te nce ap art f rom the event s that occ u r within i t (S m ol i n, 2001). Whil e eas y to grasp in princ iple,  this is  the hard e s t idea t o u nde rst and a bo ut general re l a tivi ty , and i tsconsequ enc esare  pr of ound andnot full yex pl or ed,  even at the c la ssi ca l l evel. To a c ertai n ex te nt ,  ge neral r e la t i vity  i sa re lat io nal t heor y  (F eynmanet al., 1 995 ) , in  w hi ch theonly physical ly  relevantin for mation i s the re lationships between eve n ts (Smo lin , 200 1).It is thi s d ynamic  no t ion of  space -time  t hat f acili t a te s t he  descripti o n  of  grav it y. I f the d ynamic notion of s p ace -time is exte nde d to q ua ntu m  m e cha ni c s,t h en a quantum th eory of gr av i ty  may be de s cri be d, whic h seaml essly mergesquantum m echanicswi th g e n era l relativi ty. Spac e-time, t h e con v en tiona l t hinkin ggoe s, is  not m a deup of  anyth in g at a ll. S ci entists,  however, have begun to  quest ion t his  conventi on. Spa ce-time m ay a ctually be  co mpo sed o f t i ny ch unks of  in f ormat ionw hich inte r ac t t o cr eate space- t i m e a nd it s p r operti es ( Moskowitz, 2017). This notion, i f co r r ect , w o uldno t just explain  sp ac e - time, it  c ould also h elp achi ev e  a lo ng-sou ght qu antum t h e or y  of gr avit y,which wou ldme r ge gene ra lr elativ ityan d quan tum me c hani c s , the two grandtheor i e s oft heunive rs e (Mosk o witz , 2017). T his prognos ticate s sp ace-t ime int er vals.Spa ce -time inte r vals areunive rsal re la tion shi ps whi ch a r i se na tura ll y b etween ev e n ts .  A sw ill  beseen,  s pace -time int e rvals ar e t i ny chun ks  of i nforma t io n (what, whe n,where ) which inte r actt oc reate  space -timeand its pro pe rties.Spa c e time inte rvals not onl yexpl ain spac e- time ,the yalso underlie a  quantum  theoryo f 
 events_and it_is these relationships which_give space_and_time meaning_and_structure (creating space-time)._There are a_number of relationships that_arise naturally between_events:_separation in space, separation in time, separation in space-time (space-time interval), cause-effect, past-future. These_relationships_are all_that_are_needed for the creation of_space-time and its properties. Space-time_has had_a different meaning in general relativity and quantum_mechanics._Quantum mechanics has_depended since its inception on a fixed space-time background_structure. In quantum mechanics, space-time is_a pre-existing arena_in_which_events happen; quantum theory_merely gives the rules for these_happenings (Smolin, 2001). A fundamental lesson_of general relativity is that there is_no fixed space-time background, space-time is_dynamic (Einstein, 2001; Smolin, 2001)._Space and_time arise out of the_relationships between events;_space-time has_no existence apart_from the events that occur within_it (Smolin, 2001)._While easy to grasp in principle,_this_is the hardest_idea_to_understand about_general relativity, and_its_consequences are_profound_and not fully explored, even at_the_classical level. To a certain extent, general_relativity is a relational_theory_(Feynman et al., 1995),_in which the only physically_relevant information is the relationships between_events (Smolin,_2001). It_is this dynamic notion of space-time that facilitates the description of_gravity. If the dynamic notion of_space-time is extended to_quantum mechanics,_then_a quantum theory_of_gravity may_be described, which seamlessly merges quantum mechanics_with general_relativity. Space-time, the conventional thinking goes,_is not made up_of_anything at all. Scientists, however, have_begun to question this convention. Space-time_may actually be composed of_tiny_chunks_of information which interact to_create space-time and its properties (Moskowitz,_2017). This notion,_if correct, would not just explain space-time,_it_could also help achieve a long-sought_quantum_theory of gravity, which would merge_general_relativity_and quantum mechanics, the two_grand theories of the universe (Moskowitz,_2017). This prognosticates space-time intervals. Space-time intervals are universal_relationships which arise_naturally between events. As will_be_seen,_space-time intervals are tiny chunks of information (what, when, where)_which interact_to create space-time_and its properties. Spacetime intervals not only explain space-time, they_also underlie a quantum theory of