 to appear. The world exists by virtue of mathematical necessity, e.g. as any mathematical truth such as 2+2=4; and 2.) Being is less than nothing rather than more than nothing. Thus creation is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease of nothing: it is a deficiency in relation to nothing. Time and its "arrow" form the road from that diminishment or incompleteness to nothing. Keywords: creation, quantum mechanics, being, anything, nothing Why Anything Rather than Nothing? Many researchers determine the question "Why anything rather than nothing?" as the most ancient and fundamental philosophical problem (Wippel 2011). Some believe that this problem should be questioned first, before any other problem is tackled (Hoffman, Rosenkrantz 2010). 151Why anything rather than nothing? It should underlie what the primary substance of the world is: spirit or matter. The pathway from being to time was traced by Heidegger in his famous Sein und Zeit (1927), where he insisted on the "question of the meaning of the Being" as the beginning of philosophy. We will try to answer it, too, by means of science rather than strictly by means of philosophy. Nevertheless, we will find, as Heidegger, that time inherently links to being once the question "Why being rather than nothing?" is asked. Three of the most fundamental domains of human culture – religion, physics and mathematics – have offered three quite different versions of the Creation. Our problem is very closely related to the idea of Creation shared by religion, science and philosophy (e.g. the "Big Bang", the doctrine of first cause or causa sui, the Creation in six days in the Bible, etc). In mathematics the "empty set", the mathematical equivalent to "nothing", is what is there in the beginning. From this starting point, it generates natural numbers, choice, sets, and all mathematical objects, complex or not. Mathematics, then, provides an example of how its world can be rigorously constructed on the grounds of "nothing". The concept of Creation generates big issues in physics, due to the following: the most fundamental postulate of physics – energy conservation – can be called a "no creation" axiom. Energy must conserve at all times, and thus anything physical, having by definition nonzero energy, cannot appear from nothing possessing zero energy for this would violate the rules of energy conservation. Furthermore, in different physics theories, time is conceived in two opposite ways inconsistent with each other: either revers
to appear. The world exists by virtue of numerical necessity, for example as any numerical truth such as 2 + 2=4; and 2 .) Being is less than nothing rather than more than nothing. Thus universe is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease of nothing: it is a deficiency in sexual intercourse to nothing. Time and its " arrow " form the road from that diminishment or incompleteness to nothing. Keywords: initiation, quantum mechanics, being, anything, nothing Why Anything quite than Nothing? Many researchers determine the motion " Why anything preferably than nothing? " as the most ancient and fundamental philosophical problem (Wippel 2011). Some believe that this trouble should be questioned first, before any other trouble is tackled (Hoffman, Rosenkrantz 2010). 151Why anything rather than nothing? It should underlie what the primary substance of the world is: emotional state or matter. The pathway from being to time was traced by Heidegger in his famous Sein und Zeit (1927), where he insist on the " question of the meaning of the Being " as the beginning of philosophy. We will try to answer it, too, by means of science rather than strictly by means of philosophy. Nevertheless, we will find, as Heidegger, that time inherently links to being once the question " Why being preferably than nothing? " is asked. Three of the most cardinal domain of human polish – religion, physics and mathematics – have offered three quite unlike versions of the Creation. Our trouble is very closely related to the idea of Creation share by religion, science and philosophy (e.g. the " Big Bang ", the doctrine of first causal agent or causa sui, the Creation in six days in the Bible, etc). In mathematics the " empty set ", the numerical equivalent to " nothing ", is what is there in the beginning. From this starting compass point, it generate natural numbers, choice, sets, and all numerical objects, complex or not. Mathematics, then, provides an example of how its world can be rigorously constructed on the grounds of " nothing ". The concept of Creation generates big issue in physics, due to the following: the most fundamental postulate of physics – department of energy conservation – can be called a " no creation " axiom. Energy must conserve at all clock time, and thus anything physical, having by definition nonzero energy, cannot appear from nothing possess zero energy for this would desecrate the rules of energy conservation. Furthermore, in different physics theories, clock time is conceived in two opposite manner inconsistent with each other: either revers
 to appear. The world exists by virtue of mcrhematmcal nedessity, d.g. as any mathematical truth sych aw 2+2=4; and 2.) Being is less ghan nothpng rathee then more than notijng. Thus creaflon iv not an increaxe of nothhng, but the dewrdade of nothing: it is a deficiency in relatipn to nothing. Tiie amq ita "arrow" form the road from that dijinishmtnt or incompletenrss to nothing. Keywords: crfatiln, quantum mechanifs, being, anifhigt, nothing Whh Anything Rather than Nothing? Many researchers deteroine che questiob "Qhy dnything ravher tran nothing?" as the mmst ancoent and fundakenval philosophical problem (Wippel 2011). Some beligve that tvia problem should ve quesjioneg fifwt, cefkrx ahy othfr 'roblem is fackled (Hofdman, Rosenkrantz 2010). 151Wny qnything rathsr thag gothing? It should underlie what the prikarg substance of the worle is: spirit or matter. The pathray from being to time was traced by Heidegger in his haoouw Fdun und Zeit (1927), where he insisted on the "question jr uhe meaning of thc Being" as the begonjimd of philosopfy. We cjlm try to answer it, too, by meanw of sciegce tather than strictly by meabs of philosjphy. Nevertheless, wz will find, cs Heicegget, that time inherently uinka to being lnce the sjestion "Why beine rstver than nothing?" is asked. Ehree of vhe mpst funaamemtal djmains of juman culture – religion, ohysies ang mathematlcs – have offered three quite dmhferent versipnv ox the Crzation. Our problem ys very closeli related to tfe idea of Creatimn shared br religion, schgnce and philmsophy (e.d. thw "Bit Bang", gfe doctrine of first calst or causa sui, the Creation ln sib days in the Biyut, wtc). In mathemayicr tre "ekpef set", the madhemxtizsl eqjivalenu ti "notning", is what is thera in the beginning. Frok bhis starjing poine, it generatex natural numbers, fhoicx, sets, and sll mathematical objects, complex kr not. Mahheiatics, then, [rovldes an examplz of how its world can be rigorously conwtructed on the gtounds of "nothing". The goncept of Cceatiog generatas big issues in phywics, due to the fpllowing: the most funsamentdl podtulate of physics – energy conservation – can be called a "no creation" axion. Enerjy must consedve st aln cimzs, and ehus enything physical, having by definition nonzero eiergy, cannmt appear from nothing possessone zero energy for this would violate fhe rulex of energy conservation. Furthetmore, in different physigs theoriws, tije is bknreived in two opposiye wayv incinsistebt wlth each other: eiyhcr revers
to appear. The world exists by virtue necessity, as any truth such as less nothing rather than than nothing. Thus is not an increase of nothing, the decrease of nothing: it is a deficiency in relation to nothing. Time its "arrow" form the road from that diminishment or incompleteness to nothing. Keywords: quantum being, nothing Anything Rather than Nothing? Many researchers determine the question "Why anything rather than nothing?" as the ancient and fundamental philosophical problem (Wippel 2011). Some that this problem should questioned first, before any other is (Hoffman, Rosenkrantz 151Why rather nothing? It should what the primary substance of the world is: spirit or matter. The pathway from being to time traced by his famous und (1927), he insisted on of the meaning of the Being" of philosophy. We will try to answer it, by means science rather than strictly by means philosophy. Nevertheless, we will find, as Heidegger, that inherently links to being once the question "Why being rather than nothing?" is asked. Three most fundamental domains of culture – religion, and – offered quite different of the Creation. Our problem is very closely related to the of Creation shared by religion, science and philosophy (e.g. the the of first cause causa sui, the Creation six in the Bible, etc). the set", to is is there in the From this starting point, it natural numbers, choice, sets, or not. Mathematics, then, provides an example of its world can be rigorously constructed on grounds of "nothing". The concept of Creation generates big issues in physics, to the most fundamental postulate of physics – energy conservation can be called a creation" axiom. Energy must conserve at all times, and anything having by nonzero energy, cannot from nothing possessing energy for this the rules energy Furthermore, theories, time is conceived in two ways with each other: either revers
 to appear. The world exists by vIrtue of matHematIcaL neCeSsitY, e.g. aS any mathematicAL truTh such as 2+2=4; and 2.) Being is less Than nOtHIng rAThEr thaN more thAN nOTHinG. THuS crEaTIoN is noT an IncreasE of nothing, But ThE decrease of nOThIng: it is a deFicIency in relatIon To nothInG. TiME and iTs "aRrow" fOrm the ROad froM that dimiNiSHment oR IncomplETEnEss tO nothing. Keywords: cREaTIon, quantum mechAnics, bEiNG, aNYThiNg, nOthing Why ANyThing rAther thAN NOTHIng? mAny researcherS determine tHE quEstion "whY anYThing rAther ThAN noThing?" as the mOst aNcient and FundamENtal phiLOsophicAl probLem (wipPel 2011). SOMe BeLieVe THat THiS prOBleM should bE qUeStionEd fiRST, BEforE anY othEr proBlem is tackled (hofFman, rOseNkranTz 2010). 151Why AnytHiNg ratHer thaN nothInG? It should underlIe whAt the primAry SuBstAnCe of tHE world Is: sPirIt or matTer. The pAThwAy FROM bEing to time was traceD bY hEiDegger in His famOUs seIN und Zeit (1927), WhEre He inSISted oN the "QUeStion of tHe meanINg Of The BeinG" aS the beGiNniNg oF philOSophY. We wilL try to anSwer iT, Too, by means of scIEnce rather thaN StRICtLY by mEanS of philosopHy. NeVErthElesS, We WilL Find, aS HeidEgGEr, THat time inherently liNkS to beiNg oncE the question "WHy being ratHER Than nothIng?" iS AsKEd. Three of the moSt funDamental doMAins of huMan cuLture – relIgion, physICS and mathEmaTicS – haVe oFFErEd three quite dIFFereNt VersionS of The CreaTioN. OuR prOblEm Is very cloSely relaTeD tO tHe IdeA of CrEAtion shaReD by ReLigIon, scIEnce anD philOsopHy (E.g. THe "BIg Bang", tHE dOCTrinE oF fIrst CauSe Or cauSa suI, The creatioN in six dayS in THe BiBlE, eTc). In matHematics the "emPtY set", the matHeMatIcal eqUIValent to "Nothing", is what is there in tHE beginnIng. from tHis sTarting poInt, It geneRatES naturAl numbErs, chOiCe, sETS, and aLL MaTheMaTical objecTS, ComPlex oR nOt. MaThematiCs, then, provides an exAMplE of how its worlD caN be rIGOrOusLY cONstRuCTed ON The grounds of "notHing". The conCePT oF Creation gENerAtEs big isSues in pHysicS, Due to thE followinG: the most fUnDameNTAl pOstulate of Physics – eNergy consERvatiON – cAn be cAllEd a "no cReAtiOn" axiOm. EnerGY muSt conServe aT aLl timeS, and tHuS anythinG physical, having by definiTion noNzero EneRgy, cannot AppEAr fRom nothinG posSessing zerO enErgY for tHis WOuld vIolaTE tHe rULes of EnerGY conservaTIoN. FuRTHeRmore, in diffERENt pHysicS thEOries, tIme iS conceived in two opPOsite ways inconSistENT wiTh eACh otHeR: either revers
 to appear. The world exis ts by virt ue of  ma the ma tica l ne cessity, e.g.a s an y mathematical truth s uch a s2 +2=4 ;  a nd 2. ) Being is l ess  t ha n n ot h in g rat her  than m ore than n oth in g. Thus crea t io n is not a n i ncrease of n oth ing, b ut  th e  decr eas e ofnothin g : it i s a defic ie n cy inr elation t onoth ing. Time and its "a r row" form theroad f ro m  t h a t d imi nishment o rincom p letenes s  t o n oth i ng. Keywords:  creation,q uan tum me ch ani c s, bei ng, a ny t hin g, nothingWhyAnythingRather than No t hing? M any re sea rch ersd et er min et heq ue sti o n " Why anyt hi ng  rath er t h a n noth ing ?" a s the  most ancient  an d fu n dam ental  phil osop hi cal p roblem  (Wip pe l 2011). Some b elie ve that t his  p rob le m sho u ld beque sti oned fi rst, be f ore  a n y ot her problem is tac kl e d  ( Hoffman,  Rosen k ra nt z  2010).15 1Wh y an y t hingrath e rthan not hing?I tsh ould un de rlie w ha t t heprima r y su bstanc e of the  worl d  is: spirit or matter. The p a th w a yf rombei ng to timewast race d by He ide g ger i n his  f a mo u s Sein und Zeit (19 27 ), whe re he  insisted onthe "quest i o n  of themean i ng of the Being"as th e beginnin g  of phil osoph y. We wi ll try to a nswer it , t oo,  by  me a n sof science ra t h er t ha n stric tly  by mea nsofphi los op hy. Never theless,  w ewi ll  fi nd, a s  Heidegg er , t ha t t ime i n herent ly li nksto  b e ing  once t h eq u esti on  " Whybei ng  rath er t h annothing ?" is ask ed. Thre eof  the mo st fundamenta ldomains of  h uma n cult u r e – reli gion, physics and mathe m atics –  ha ve of fere d three q uit e diff ere n t vers ions o f the  C rea t i on. O u r  p rob le m is veryc l ose ly re la tedto theidea of Creation s h are d by religion , s cien c e  a ndp hi l oso ph y  (e . g . the "Big Bang ", the doc tr i ne  of firstc aus eor caus a sui,the C r eationin six da ys in the  B ible , etc ). In math ematicsthe "empt y  set" ,  t he ma the matica lequ ivale nt to" not hing" , is w ha t is t herein  the beg inning. From this start ing po int,itgenerates  na t ura l numbers , ch oice, sets , a ndall m ath e matic al o b je cts ,  comp lexo r not. Ma t he mat i c s,  then, prov i d e s a n exa mpl e  of ho w it s world can be ri g orously constr ucte d onthe grou nd s of "nothing" . T he c oncept o fCreation ge neratesbi g  issu es inphysic s, duet o  t h e foll owin g:the mostfun da m ental p os tu l ate of  phy si cs – e nergyc onse r v ation – can be c alled a  "noc rea tion"  a xiom. E n ergy  must cons erve at all  times , an d thu s anyth in g phys ica l,  having by definitio n non zero en er gy,can not ap pear f rom n othi ng  po ssessingz e ro en er g y f or t his w ou ld v iolate th e  rules o f e n ergy co ns erv a t ion. F u rt h e rmore, indif feren t physics th e orie s ,t ime i s conc eivedin twoo ppo si te ways  in c o nsistentwith each oth er : ei ther rev er s
 to_appear. The_world exists by virtue_of mathematical_necessity,_e.g. as_any_mathematical truth such_as 2+2=4; and_2.) Being is less_than nothing rather_than_more than nothing. Thus creation is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease_of_nothing: it_is_a_deficiency in relation to nothing._Time and its "arrow" form_the road_from that diminishment or incompleteness to nothing. Keywords:_creation,_quantum mechanics, being,_anything, nothing Why Anything Rather than Nothing? Many researchers_determine the question "Why anything rather_than nothing?" as_the_most_ancient and fundamental philosophical_problem (Wippel 2011). Some believe that_this problem should be questioned first,_before any other problem is tackled (Hoffman,_Rosenkrantz 2010). 151Why anything rather than_nothing? It should underlie what_the primary_substance of the world is:_spirit or matter._The pathway_from being to_time was traced by Heidegger in_his famous Sein_und Zeit (1927), where he insisted_on_the "question of_the_meaning_of the_Being" as the_beginning_of philosophy._We_will try to answer it, too,_by_means of science rather than strictly by_means of philosophy. Nevertheless,_we_will find, as Heidegger,_that time inherently links to_being once the question "Why being_rather than_nothing?" is_asked. Three of the most fundamental domains of human culture –_religion, physics and mathematics – have_offered three quite different_versions of_the_Creation. Our problem_is_very closely_related to the idea of Creation shared_by religion,_science and philosophy (e.g. the "Big_Bang", the doctrine of_first_cause or causa sui, the Creation_in six days in the Bible,_etc). In mathematics the "empty_set",_the_mathematical equivalent to "nothing", is_what is there in the beginning._From this starting_point, it generates natural numbers, choice, sets,_and_all mathematical objects, complex or not._Mathematics,_then, provides an example of how_its_world_can be rigorously constructed on_the grounds of "nothing". The concept_of Creation generates big issues in physics, due to_the following: the_most fundamental postulate of physics_–_energy_conservation – can be called a "no creation" axiom. Energy_must conserve_at all times,_and thus anything physical, having by definition nonzero energy, cannot_appear from nothing possessing zero energy for_this would violate the rules of energy conservation. Furthermore, in different_physics theories, time is conceived in two opposite_ways inconsistent with each other: either revers