 theory (pp. 245-264). London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ Leonardi, P. M., & Jackson, M. H. (2004). Technological determinism and discursive closure in organizational mergers. Journal o f Organizational Change Management, 17(6), 615-631. doi:10.1108/09534810410564587 Leonardi, P. M. (2008). Indeterminacy and the discourse of inevitability in international technology management. Academy o f Management Review, 33(4), 975-984. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Crossing the implementation line: The mutual constitution of technology and organizing across development and use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 278-310. doi:10.1111/j.l468-2885.2009.01344.x Lewin, D. (2010). They know not what they do: The spiritual meaning o f technological progress. Journal o f Contemporary Religion, 25(3), 347-362. Lievrouw, L. (2006). New media design and development: Diffusion o f innovations v. social shaping of technology. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook o f new media (2006 student ed.). Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_nl4.html Lillehammer University College (Producer). (2006). When means become ends: Technology producing values [Video], Retrieved from http://seminar.net/ Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. London, UK: London School o f Economics and Political Science. Lowrance, W. W. (2010). The relation of science and technology to human values. In C. Hanks (Ed.), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 38-48). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 293 Luckerhoff, J., & Guillemette, F. (2011). The Conflicts between grounded theory requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 396-414. MacKeogh, K., & Fox, S. (2009). Strategies for embedding e-Leaming in traditional universities: Drivers and barriers. Electronic Journal o f e
theory (pp. 245 - 264). London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/ Leonardi, P. M., & Jackson, M. H. (2004). Technological determinism and discursive blockage in organizational amalgamation. Journal o f Organizational Change Management, 17(6), 615 - 631. doi:10.1108/09534810410564587 Leonardi, P. M. (2008). Indeterminacy and the discourse of inevitability in external technology management. Academy o f Management Review, 33(4), 975 - 984. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Crossing the execution tune: The mutual fundamental law of technology and organizing across exploitation and use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 278 - 310. doi:10.1111 / j.l468 - 2885.2009.01344.x Lewin, D. (2010). They sleep together not what they serve: The spiritual meaning o f technological progress. Journal o f Contemporary Religion, 25(3), 347 - 362. Lievrouw, L. (2006). fresh media design and development: Diffusion oxygen f innovations v. social shaping of engineering. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds .), The handbook o f raw media (2006 scholar ed .). Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_nl4.html Lillehammer University College (Producer). (2006). When means become ends: engineering producing values [ Video ], Retrieved from http://seminar.net/ Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. London, UK: London School o f Economics and Political Science. Lowrance, W. W. (2010). The relation of science and technology to human values. In C. Hanks (Ed .), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 38 - 48). West Sussex, UK: Wiley - Blackwell. 293 Luckerhoff, J., & Guillemette, F. (2011). The Conflicts between ground theory requirements and institutional prerequisite for scientific research. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 396 - 414. MacKeogh, K., & Fox, S. (2009). Strategies for embedding e - Leaming in traditional university: Drivers and barriers. Electronic Journal o f e
 thfory (pp. 245-264). London: Sage Pubuications. Retrigvwd frok http://armo.sageoub.com/ Leonardi, P. M., & Jackson, M. H. (2004). Ttbhnological determinirm and didcursive clowyre in orgehizatiokcl medners. Lonrnal o f Organlzational Cvange Managemett, 17(6), 615-631. doi:10.1108/09534810410564587 Leonardi, P. M. (2008). Indeterminacy anq the dosfourse of inevytabplyty jn international technology managejent. Acedemy o f Managrment Review, 33(4), 975-984. Leonardi, P. L. (2009). Cgossing the implemfntation libe: Trw mutual conrtitution of technologi and organizing across developmdnt aud use acticiried. Communicatmon Thvory, 19, 278-310. doi:10.1111/j.l468-2885.2009.01344.x Lewin, D. (2010). They lnow not what bhey vo: Tye spiritual meaning m f technological krogress. Jmuxnal o f Contemporary Rwligimn, 25(3), 347-362. Liexeoud, L. (2006). Iew media deaign and dsvelopment: Eiffusion o f innovstyins v. social ahapind jf technology. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstmne (Eds.), The handbook o f nww media (2006 student ed.). Tetrieved srom http://www.sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_nn4.html Uiloemammde Kniversity College (Producer). (2006). When means becomq emdx: Technology pvoducing values [Vicel], Tgtrieved from fttp://seminzr.net/ Livingstone, D., & Haddjn, L. (2009). EU kids jnlime: Final report. London, UK: Lindon School i f Economics and 'olitical Scnence. Kowramce, W. W. (2010). The relation oy sciehce and tecjnology tk human values. In C. Manns (Ed.), Technology and valuef: Essentiel recdings (po. 38-48). Wgst Susfex, UK: Wilfy-Blagnwell. 293 Luckerhoff, U., & Gunllematte, F. (2011). Thf Conflicts between grounded thxpry requiremgntv atd insticutionsl requiremenes for scientiyic resecrch. Tfe Qualitanive Repoct, 16(2), 396-414. MacKeogr, K., & Fox, S. (2009). Sdtategies for xmbedding e-Leqmint in trxaitional univetsities: Dgirers and varriers. Electronig Joutnzl o f e
theory (pp. 245-264). London: Sage Publications. Retrieved Leonardi, M., & M. H. (2004). in mergers. Journal o Organizational Change Management, 615-631. doi:10.1108/09534810410564587 Leonardi, P. M. (2008). and the discourse of inevitability in international technology management. Academy o f Management 33(4), 975-984. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Crossing the implementation line: The mutual constitution technology organizing development use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 278-310. doi:10.1111/j.l468-2885.2009.01344.x Lewin, D. (2010). They know not what they do: spiritual meaning o f technological progress. Journal o Contemporary Religion, 25(3), 347-362. L. (2006). New media design development: o f v. shaping technology. In L. & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook o f new media (2006 student ed.). Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_nl4.html Lillehammer College (Producer). means become Technology values Retrieved from http://seminar.net/ & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids London, UK: London School o f Economics and Science. Lowrance, W. (2010). The relation of science technology to human values. In C. Hanks (Ed.), and values: Essential readings (pp. 38-48). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 293 Luckerhoff, J., & Guillemette, The Conflicts between grounded requirements and institutional for research. Qualitative 16(2), 396-414. K., & Fox, S. (2009). Strategies for embedding e-Leaming in traditional Drivers and barriers. Electronic Journal o f e
 theory (pp. 245-264). London: Sage PublicaTions. RetriEved fRom HttP://sRmo.sAgepUb.com/ Leonardi, P. m., & jackSon, M. H. (2004). Technological deteRminiSm ANd diSCuRsive Closure IN oRGAniZaTiOnaL mERgErs. JoUrnAl o f OrgAnizationaL ChAnGe Management, 17(6), 615-631. DOi:10.1108/09534810410564587 leonardi, P. M. (2008). indEterminacy anD thE discoUrSe oF IneviTabIlity In inteRNationAl technolOgY ManageMEnt. AcadEMY o F ManAgement Review, 33(4), 975-984. LeonARdI, p. M. (2009). Crossing the iMplemeNtATiON LinE: ThE mutual conStItutiON of techNOlOGY And ORganizing acroSs developmeNT anD use acTiVitIEs. CommUnicaTiON ThEory, 19, 278-310. doi:10.1111/j.l468-2885.2009.01344.x LEwin, d. (2010). They know Not whaT They do: THE spiritUal meaNinG o f TechNOlOgIcaL pROgrESs. jouRNal O f ContemPoRaRy RelIgioN, 25(3), 347-362. lIEVrouW, L. (2006). NEw meDia deSign and develoPmeNt: DiFFusIon o f InnovAtioNs V. sociAl shapIng of TeChnology. In L. LievRouw & s. LivingstOne (edS.), ThE hAndboOK o f new MedIa (2006 sTudent eD.). RetrieVEd fRoM HTTp://Www.sage-ereference.cOm/HDBk_Newmedia/articlE_Nl4.HtML LillehaMmEr UNiveRSIty CoLlegE (prOducer). (2006). WhEn meanS BeCoMe ends: TEcHnologY pRodUciNg valUEs [ViDeo], RetRieved frOm httP://Seminar.net/ LiviNGstone, S., & Haddon, l. (2009). eU KIDs ONlinE: FiNal report. LoNdon, uk: LonDon SCHoOl o F econoMics aNd pOlITical Science. LowrancE, W. w. (2010). The reLatioN of science and Technology TO HUman valuEs. In c. haNKs (Ed.), Technology And vaLues: EssentIAl readinGs (pp. 38-48). WEst SusseX, UK: Wiley-BLACkwell. 293 LuCkeRhoFf, J., & guiLLEmEtte, F. (2011). The ConflICTs beTwEen grouNdeD theory ReqUirEmeNts AnD institutIonal reqUiReMeNtS foR scieNTific resEaRch. thE QuAlitaTIve RepOrt, 16(2), 396-414. MaCKeoGh, k., & FOX, S. (2009). STrategiES fOR EmbeDdInG e-LeAmiNg In traDitiONal UniversIties: DrivErs ANd baRrIeRs. ElectRonic Journal o F e
 theory (pp. 245-264). Lon don: SagePubli cat ion s.  Ret riev ed from http:/ / srmo .sagepub.com/ Leonardi , P.M. ,  & J a ck son,M. H. ( 2 00 4 ) . T ec hn olo gi c al  dete rmi nism an d discursi vecl osure in org a ni zational m erg ers. Journal  of Orga ni zat i onalCha nge M anagem e nt, 17 (6), 615- 63 1 . doi: 1 0.1108/ 0 9 53 4810 410564587 Leonard i ,P . M. (2008). I ndeter mi n ac y and  th e discours eof in e vitabil i ty i n  in t ernational te chnology ma n age ment.Ac ade m y o fManag em e ntReview, 33( 4),975-984.Leonar d i, P. M .  (2009) . Cros sin g t he i m pl em ent at i onl in e:T hemutual c on st ituti on o f t e chno log y an d org anizing acros s d evel o pme nt an d use  act iv ities . Comm unica ti on Theory, 19,278- 310. doi: 10. 11 11/ j. l468- 2 885.20 09. 013 44.x Le win, D. (20 10 ) . Th ey know not what t he y do : The sp iritua l  m ea n ing o fte chn olog i c al pr ogre s s.  Journal  o f C o nt em poraryRe ligion ,25( 3),  347- 3 62.Lievro uw, L. ( 2006) .  New media des i gn and develo p me n t :D iffu sio n o f innov atio n s v.  soc i al  sh a pingof te ch n ol o gy. In L. Lievrouw&S. Liv ingst one (Eds.), T he handboo k o  f new m edia (2 0 06 student ed. ). Re trieved fr o m http:/ /www. sage-ere ference.c o m /hdbk_ne wme dia /Ar tic l e _n l4.html Lille h a mmer  U niversi tyCollege  (P rod uce r).  ( 2006). Wh en means  b ec om eend s: Te c hnologypr odu ci ngvalue s  [Vide o], R etri ev ed fro m http: / /s e m inar .n et / Li vin gs tone,  S., & H addon,L. (2009) . E U  kid son line: F inal report.Lo ndon, UK:Lo ndo n Scho o l  o f Eco nomics and Political Sc i ence. L owr ance,  W.W. (2010) . T he rel ati o n of s cience  andte chn o l ogy t o hu man  v alues. InC .  Ha nks ( Ed .),Technol ogy and values: Es s ent ial readings(pp . 38 - 4 8) . W e st Sus se x , U K :  Wiley-Blackwel l. 293 Luc ke r ho ff, J., &G uil le mette,F. (201 1). T h e Confl icts betw een groun de d th e o ryrequiremen ts and i nstitutio n al re q ui remen tsfor sc ie nti fic r esearc h . T he Qu alitat iv e Repo rt, 1 6( 2), 396- 414. MacKeogh, K., & Fo x, S.(2009 ).Strategie s f o r e mbeddinge-Le aming in t rad iti onaluni v ersit ies: Dr ive r s and  bar r iers. Ele c tr oni c Jo urnal o f e 
 theory_(pp. 245-264)._London: Sage Publications. Retrieved_from http://srmo.sagepub.com/_Leonardi,_P. M.,_&_Jackson, M. H._(2004). Technological determinism_and discursive closure in_organizational mergers. Journal_o_f Organizational Change Management, 17(6), 615-631. doi:10.1108/09534810410564587 Leonardi, P. M. (2008). Indeterminacy and the_discourse_of inevitability_in_international_technology management. Academy o f_Management Review, 33(4), 975-984. Leonardi,_P. M._(2009). Crossing the implementation line: The mutual constitution_of_technology and organizing_across development and use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 278-310._doi:10.1111/j.l468-2885.2009.01344.x Lewin, D. (2010). They know_not what they_do:_The_spiritual meaning o f_technological progress. Journal o f Contemporary_Religion, 25(3), 347-362. Lievrouw, L. (2006)._New media design and development: Diffusion o_f innovations v. social shaping of_technology. In L. Lievrouw &_S. Livingstone_(Eds.), The handbook o f_new media (2006_student ed.)._Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_nl4.html_Lillehammer University College (Producer). (2006). When_means become ends:_Technology producing values [Video], Retrieved from_http://seminar.net/_Livingstone, S., &_Haddon,_L._(2009). EU_kids online: Final_report._London, UK:_London_School o f Economics and Political_Science._Lowrance, W. W. (2010). The relation of_science and technology to_human_values. In C. Hanks_(Ed.), Technology and values: Essential_readings (pp. 38-48). West Sussex, UK:_Wiley-Blackwell. 293_Luckerhoff, J.,_& Guillemette, F. (2011). The Conflicts between grounded theory requirements and_institutional requirements for scientific research. The_Qualitative Report, 16(2), 396-414._MacKeogh, K.,_&_Fox, S. (2009)._Strategies_for embedding_e-Leaming in traditional universities: Drivers and barriers._Electronic Journal_o f e