 the theory to introduce the graviton mass"..."gravitons do not travel in Minkowski space, like in linear theory, but in effective Riemannian space"..."An interesting picture arises consisting in that the motion of matter in Minkowski space with the metric γμν under the influence of the gravitational field φμν is identical to the motion of matter in effective Riemannian space with the metric gμν" [28]. 16 Aggregating new equivalence, in General Relativity, gravity is an effect of coordinates. The great theoretical ambition of Einstein was explain gravity as an effect of coordinates, generalizing the Galilean principle of relativity to any class of motion, based in the physical fact of the equality between the inertial and gravitational masses, established with high accuracy in the Eotvos experiment, which achieved its best accuracy of 1 in 100 billion, in its last repetition. However, closed to Entwurf theory, Einstein understood gravity would be other thing because the EEP is valid only where there is not gravity, i.e. in the Minkowski s spacetime. Then, Einstein was in front of a double fundamental problem, what is homogenous gravity? Of other hand, in general, what is gravity? Respect to homogenous gravity, there is no doubt; it is other name of uniform acceleration, also of inertial motion. But, in general, gravity could be the curvature of spacetime best that those gravitational potentials because it is a respond more convincing. The argument to favor of Einstein is based in "that spacetime curvature is a manifestation of gravitation since Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvature) implies gμν ≠ ηαβ everywhere (gravitation) but gμν ≠ ηαβ (gravitation) does not imply Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvature)" [11], that it would be the case of homogenous gravity when it is really effect of coordinates, therefore as other name of acceleration it satisfies gμν ≠ ηαβ. But, not when it is other name of inertial motion. In all case, homogenous gravity cannot be considered true gravity owing to the existence of the permanent or extended gravity, which it would be real. However, in all case, it arise the problem: what is spacetime? Whose respond, inside of the lawmen category, remit to the strong philosophical dispute between the schools of the substantivalism and the relationalism where there are various definitions that, among the main, the author classifies
the theory to introduce the graviton mass"... "gravitons do not travel in Minkowski space, like in linear hypothesis, but in effective Riemannian space"... "An interesting movie arises consisting in that the apparent motion of topic in Minkowski space with the metric γμν under the influence of the gravitational field φμν is identical to the gesture of matter in effective Riemannian space with the measured gμν " [ 28 ]. 16 aggregate new comparison, in General Relativity, gravity is an effect of coordinate. The great theoretical ambition of Einstein was explain gravity as an effect of coordinates, generalizing the Galilean principle of relativity to any course of motion, based in the physical fact of the equality between the inertial and gravitational mass, established with high accuracy in the Eotvos experiment, which achieve its best accuracy of 1 in 100 billion, in its final repetition. However, close to Entwurf theory, Einstein understood gravity would be early thing because the EEP is valid only where there is not gravity, i.e. in the Minkowski s spacetime. Then, Einstein was in front of a double cardinal trouble, what is homogeneous gravity? Of other hand, in general, what is gravity? Respect to homogenous graveness, there is no doubt; it is early name of uniform acceleration, also of inertial apparent motion. But, in general, gravity could be the curvature of spacetime best that those gravitational potentials because it is a respond more convincing. The controversy to favor of Einstein is based in " that spacetime curvature is a manifestation of gravitation since Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvature) imply gμν ≠ ηαβ everywhere (gravitation) but gμν ≠ ηαβ (gravitation) does not imply Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvature) " [ 11 ], that it would be the case of homogeneous gravity when it is really effect of coordinates, therefore as other name of acceleration it satisfies gμν ≠ ηαβ. But, not when it is early name of inertial apparent motion. In all case, homogenous gravity cannot be considered genuine gravity owing to the existence of the permanent or extensive gravity, which it would be real. However, in all case, it arise the trouble: what is spacetime? Whose respond, inside of the lawmen category, remit to the strong philosophic dispute between the schools of the substantivalism and the relationalism where there are various definitions that, among the main, the writer classifies
 thf theory to introduce tht graviton mass"..."grccitons do nof travel in Minkowski space, like in pibear ukeory, but in effectixe Riemanjian spaxe"..."An unterestinj picturc ariacs cousmsting in that jhe motion ox matter in Mitkuwdki space with the metric γμν under thq influrnfe of the gravytatpogal rpeod φμν is identical to the motioh of mauter in effective Tiemannian space with the letrlc gμν" [28]. 16 Aggregating new equivaoencq, in General Felativity, gravity is zn effect of coordinates. The grdat tkeoretical qmvitlmn of Einstxin waf explain gravity as an effrct of coordinstev, gwneralizing the Galilxan principle of relwtivity tm cny class of motion, bqswd in the phyrucau fzcv or the fquelity betwesn the inerrial and gravitatiomaj masses, estabmished wyth high accuracy in the Eotvos experimtnt, wgich achieved its best qccuracy of 1 in 100 billlon, in itf last repetition. However, closed to Entwurf theorf, Einageiu undefwtlod gravity would be other thing because the QSP ix valid only wmere there is not brwvojy, i.e. in the Mknkowski a spacetime. Then, Elnstein was un front jf a double fundamental problem, what is homjtenous gravity? Of lther hand, nn gengral, wnat is gravity? Respect co homkgenous gragity, thers is no doubt; it ks ptver name of uniform accelewation, alwo oy inertixl mption. Fut, in genfral, nsavity could be thf curratura of spacehime best that those gravitatioiel potentials bacalse it is a rexpond more cogvincing. The atgument tj favur of Einsnein is besed in "that spacetime cusgature is a kanifestwtiob of gravitxgion since Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetimv eurvature) implies gμν ≠ ηαβ everyxherg (fravitation) but gμν ≠ ηαβ (gravitation) dpes noe pmpky Sαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetima cufvagire)" [11], ghat it wouoa be the case of homogenmus fravity when it is rcally effgct of cojrdinates, thetefore as other nale of acrelerayiog it satisfies gμν ≠ ηαβ. But, not wheh it is ohhev name of inewtiao motion. In cll case, homogenous gravity cannot be coisidered true gravity oqing to the existenee of the perkanene or extetded gravity, which ir would be real. Hpwever, in all case, it arise the oroblem: what is spacetime? Whose respond, inside of the lawmen category, remut to vhq strong phjlospphicdl bispute betxexn the schools of the substantivalism and the reuationalhsi where there are various degivitions that, xmong the main, the authod classigies
the theory to introduce the graviton mass"..."gravitons travel Minkowski space, in linear theory, interesting arises consisting in the motion of in Minkowski space with the metric under the influence of the gravitational field φμν is identical to the motion matter in effective Riemannian space with the metric gμν" [28]. 16 Aggregating new in Relativity, is effect of coordinates. The great theoretical ambition of Einstein was explain gravity as an effect of generalizing the Galilean principle of relativity to any of motion, based in physical fact of the equality the and gravitational established high in the Eotvos which achieved its best accuracy of 1 in 100 billion, in its last repetition. However, closed to theory, Einstein would be thing the is valid only is not gravity, i.e. in the Then, Einstein was in front of a double problem, what homogenous gravity? Of other hand, in what is gravity? Respect to homogenous gravity, there no doubt; it is other name of uniform acceleration, also of inertial motion. But, in could be the curvature spacetime best that gravitational because is respond more The argument to favor of Einstein is based in "that spacetime is a manifestation of gravitation since Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime gμν ηαβ everywhere (gravitation) gμν ≠ ηαβ (gravitation) not Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime that would of gravity it is really effect coordinates, therefore as other name acceleration it satisfies gμν it is other name of inertial motion. In case, homogenous gravity cannot be considered true owing to the existence of the permanent or extended gravity, which it be real. all case, it arise the problem: what is Whose respond, inside of lawmen category, remit to the strong philosophical dispute between schools the substantivalism the relationalism where are various definitions among the main, classifies
 the theory to introduce the grAviton mass"..."GraviTonS do NoT traVel iN Minkowski spacE, Like In linear theory, but in effEctivE RIEmanNIaN spacE"..."An inteREsTINg pIcTuRe aRiSEs ConsiStiNg in thaT the motion Of mAtTer in MinkowsKI sPace with thE meTric γμν under The InflueNcE of THe graVitAtionAl fielD Φμν is iDentical tO tHE motioN Of matteR IN eFfecTive Riemannian spaCE wITh the metric gμν" [28]. 16 aggregAtINg NEW eqUivAlence, in GeNeRal ReLAtivity, GRaVITY is AN effect of coorDinates. The gREat TheoreTiCal AMbitioN of EiNsTEin Was explain gRaviTy as an effEct of cOOrdinatES, generaLizing The galIleaN PrInCipLe OF reLAtIviTY to Any class Of MoTion, bAsed IN THE phySicAl faCt of tHe equality betWeeN the INerTial aNd graVitaTiOnal mAsses, eStablIsHed with high accuRacy In the EotvOs eXpEriMeNt, whiCH achieVed Its Best accUracy of 1 IN 100 biLlION, In Its last repetition. HOwEVEr, Closed to entwurF ThEoRY, EinsteiN uNdeRstoOD GraviTy woULd Be other tHing beCAuSe The EEP iS vAlid onLy WheRe tHere iS Not gRavity, I.e. in the MInkowSKi s spacetime. ThEN, Einstein was iN FrONT oF A douBle Fundamental ProbLEm, whAt is HOmOgeNOus grAvity? of OThER hand, in general, what iS gRavity? respeCt to homogenouS gravity, thERE Is no doubT; it iS OtHEr name of uniforM acceLeration, alSO of inertIal moTion. But, iN general, gRAVity coulD be The CurVatURE oF spacetime besT THat tHoSe graviTatIonal poTenTiaLs bEcaUsE it is a resPond more CoNvInCiNg. THe argUMent to faVoR of eiNstEin is BAsed in "That sPaceTiMe CUrvAture is A MaNIFestAtIoN of gRavItAtion SincE rαβΜν ≠ 0 (spaceTime curvaTurE) ImplIeS gΜν ≠ ηαβ evErywhere (graviTaTion) but gμν ≠ ΗαΒ (grAvitatION) does not Imply Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvATure)" [11], thaT it Would Be thE case of hoMogEnous gRavITy when It is reAlly eFfEct OF CoordINAtEs, tHeRefore as otHER naMe of aCcElerAtion it Satisfies gμν ≠ ηαβ. But, NOt wHen it is other nAme Of inERTiAl mOTiON. In AlL CasE, HOmogenous gravitY cannot be cOnSIdEred true grAVitY oWing to tHe existEnce oF The permAnent or exTended graViTy, whICH it Would be reaL. However, In all case, IT arisE ThE probLem: What is SpAceTime? WHose reSPonD, insiDe of thE lAwmen cAtegoRy, Remit to tHe strong philosophical diSpute bEtweeN thE schools oF thE SubStantivalIsm aNd the relatIonAliSm wheRe tHEre arE varIOuS deFInitiOns tHAt, among thE MaIn, tHE AuThor classifIES
 the theory to introduce t he gravito n mas s". .." gr avit onsdo not traveli n Mi nkowski space, like in  line ar theo r y,  butin effe c ti v e  Ri em an nia ns pa ce".. ."A n inter esting pic tur earises consi s ti ng in that  th e motion ofmat ter in  M ink o wskispa ce wi th the metric  γμν unde rt he inf l uence o f th e gr avitational field φμ ν  is identicalto the  m o ti o n  of  ma tter in ef fe ctive Riemann i an s p ace with the metr ic gμν" [28 ] . 1 6 Aggr eg ati n g newequiv al e nce , in Genera l Re lativity,  gravi t y is an effectof coo rdi nat es.T he  g rea tt heo r et ica l  am bition o fEi nstei n wa s e x plai n g ravi ty as  an effect of  co ordi n ate s, ge neral izin gthe G alilea n pri nc iple of relativ ityto any cl ass  o f m ot ion,b ased i n t hephysica l facto f t he e q ua lity between the i ne r t ia l and gr avitat i on al masses,es tab lish e d  with  hig h  a ccuracyin the Eo tv os expe ri ment,wh ich  ac hieve d  its  bestaccuracy  of 1 in 100 billion ,  in its lastr ep e t it i on.How ever, close d to Entw urft he ory ,  Eins teinun d er s tood gravity wouldbe  other  thin g because the  EEP is va l i d  only wh eret he r e is not gravi ty, i .e. in the Minkowsk i s s pacetime . Then, E i n stein wa s i n f ron t o f adouble fundam e n talpr oblem,wha t is ho mog eno usgra vi ty? Of ot her hand ,in  g en era l, wh a t is gra vi ty?  R esp ect t o  homog enous  gra vi ty ,  th ere isn od o ubt;  i tis o the rnameof u n ifo rm acce leration,  al s o of  i ne rtial m otion. But, i ngeneral, g ra vit y coul d be the c urvature of spacetime b e st that  th ose g ravi tationalpot ential s b e causeit isa res po ndm o re co n v in cin g.  The argum e n t t o fav or  ofEinstei n is based in "tha t  sp acetime curva tur e is a  m ani f es t ati on ofg r avitation since  Rαβμν ≠ 0  ( s pa cetime cur v atu re ) impli es gμν≠ ηαβ everywh ere (grav itation)bu t gμ ν ≠ η αβ (gravit ation) d oes not i m ply R α βμ ν ≠ 0  (s paceti me  cu rvatu re)" [ 1 1],  that  it wo ul d be t he ca se  of homo genous gravity when itis rea lly e ffe ct of coo rdi n ate s, theref oreas other n ame  of  acce ler a tionit s a ti sfi e s gμν  ≠ η α β. But, n o twhe n it  is other n a m e  of  iner tia l  motio n. I n all case, homog e nous gravity c anno t becon s ider ed  true gravityowi ng t o the ex is tence of th e perman en t  or e xtende d grav ity, wh i c hi t woul d be  re al. Howev er,  i n  all ca se ,i t aris e th eproble m: wha t  iss p acetime? Whose r espon d ,  insi d e o f the  l awmen c a tego ry, remitto the stro ng phi loso phica l dispu te  betwe enth e schoolso f the sub stant ivalism  a nd t herelati onal i s m whe re t he reare vario u s  d e fi ni t ion s th at, a mo ng t he main,t he autho r c l assifie s
 the_theory to_introduce the graviton mass"..."gravitons_do not_travel_in Minkowski_space,_like in linear_theory, but in_effective Riemannian space"..."An interesting_picture arises consisting_in_that the motion of matter in Minkowski space with the metric γμν under the_influence_of the_gravitational_field_φμν is identical to the_motion of matter in effective_Riemannian space_with the metric gμν" [28]. 16 Aggregating new_equivalence,_in General Relativity,_gravity is an effect of coordinates. The great theoretical_ambition of Einstein was explain gravity_as an effect_of_coordinates,_generalizing the Galilean principle_of relativity to any class of_motion, based in the physical fact_of the equality between the inertial and_gravitational masses, established with high accuracy_in the Eotvos experiment, which_achieved its_best accuracy of 1 in_100 billion, in_its last_repetition. However, closed_to Entwurf theory, Einstein understood gravity_would be other_thing because the EEP is valid_only_where there is_not_gravity,_i.e. in_the Minkowski s_spacetime._Then, Einstein_was_in front of a double fundamental_problem,_what is homogenous gravity? Of other hand,_in general, what is_gravity?_Respect to homogenous gravity,_there is no doubt; it_is other name of uniform acceleration,_also of_inertial motion._But, in general, gravity could be the curvature of spacetime best_that those gravitational potentials because it_is a respond more_convincing. The_argument_to favor of_Einstein_is based_in "that spacetime curvature is a manifestation_of gravitation_since Rαβμν ≠ 0 (spacetime curvature)_implies gμν ≠ ηαβ_everywhere_(gravitation) but gμν ≠ ηαβ (gravitation)_does not imply Rαβμν ≠ 0_(spacetime curvature)" [11], that it_would_be_the case of homogenous gravity_when it is really effect of_coordinates, therefore as_other name of acceleration it satisfies gμν_≠_ηαβ. But, not when it is_other_name of inertial motion. In all_case,_homogenous_gravity cannot be considered true_gravity owing to the existence of_the permanent or extended gravity, which it would be_real. However, in_all case, it arise the_problem:_what_is spacetime? Whose respond, inside of the lawmen category, remit_to the_strong philosophical dispute_between the schools of the substantivalism and the relationalism where_there are various definitions that, among the_main, the author classifies