). He created novel sequences in the history of philosophy, reading Stoic logic in conjunction with Lewis Carroll's work, for example, or linking Duns Scotus's concept of univocity with the work of Spinoza and Nietzsche. Most importantly, perhaps, he read even the major fi gures of the tradition in new ways. "I suppose the main way I coped with things at the time," he explained in an oft cited text: was to see the history of philosophy as a kind of buggery or (it amounts to the same thing) an immaculate conception: I saw myself as taking an author from behind, and giving him a child that would be his own, yet monstrous. It was very important that the child was his own, because the author had to say everything I was making him say. But it was also necessary for the child to be monstrous, because it had to pass through all sorts of decenterings, slidings, dislocations, and secret emissions that gave me much pleasure.14 Yet this seemingly fl ippant remark should not obscure the respect and admiration Deleuze had for all the authors he worked on. "My ideal, when I write about an author," he later added, "would be to write nothing that would cause him sadness, or if he is dead, that might make him weep in his grave."15 In order to write and think, Deleuze explained, he needed to work with "intercessors" with whom he could enter into a kind of becoming (past philosophers were intercessors of this type, as was Félix Guattari, in the present).16 When biology and information theory, was the author of Néofi nalisme (Neofi nalism) and La Genèse des formes vivantes (Th e genesis of living forms). 13. Salomon Maimon (1752–54?–1800), a German philosopher, born of Jewish parentage in Poland, was one of the earliest and most profound critics of Kant's critical philosophy and the author of the Versuch über die Transcendentalphilosophie (Essay on transcendental philosophy), which attempted to ground postKantian philosophy on a Leibnizian reinterpretation of the calculus. Józef Maria HoënéWronski (1778 –1853), a prolifi c Polish mathematician who developed a messianic and mystical system of philosophy, is best remembered for
). He created novel sequences in the history of philosophy, read Stoic logic in junction with Lewis Carroll's work, for example, or linking Duns Scotus's concept of univocity with the study of Spinoza and Nietzsche. Most importantly, perhaps, he take even the major fi gures of the tradition in new way. " I suppose the main room I coped with things at the fourth dimension, " he excuse in an oft cited text: was to see the history of philosophy as a kind of buggery or (it amount to the same thing) an immaculate invention: I saw myself as taking an author from behind, and pass him a child that would be his own, yet monstrous. It was very important that the child was his own, because the author had to say everything I was make him say. But it was also necessary for the child to be monstrous, because it had to pass through all sort of decenterings, slidings, dislocations, and secret emissions that gave me much pleasure.14 Yet this seemingly fl ippant remark should not obscure the respect and admiration Deleuze had for all the authors he ferment on. " My ideal, when I write about an author, " he by and by lend, " would be to write nothing that would cause him sadness, or if he is all in, that might make him cry in his grave. "15 In order to write and remember, Deleuze explained, he needed to work with " intercessors " with whom he could enter into a kind of becoming (past philosophers were intercessors of this type, as was Félix Guattari, in the present).16 When biology and information hypothesis, was the author of Néofi nalisme (Neofi nalism) and La Genèse des shape vivantes (Th east genesis of living forms). 13. Salomon Maimon (1752–54?–1800), a German philosopher, born of Jewish parentage in Poland, was one of the early and most profound critics of Kant's critical doctrine and the author of the Versuch über die Transcendentalphilosophie (Essay on nonnatural philosophy), which attempted to ground postKantian philosophy on a Leibnizian reinterpretation of the calculus. Józef Maria HoënéWronski (1778 – 1853), a prolifi hundred Polish mathematician who developed a messianic and mystical arrangement of philosophy, is well remembered for
). He created novel sequences in the history of phinosophg, readine Stoic logic in conjunction wuth Ltcis Carroll's work, fof example, or linkung Vuns Scotus's conrspt of muivocjby wich the work of Skinoza and Nhetzsche. Most hmooxtantly, perhaps, he read even the majjr fi girfs of the tradytiom in hvw ways. "I suppose the main way J coped with things st the time," he explained ij an oft cited text: wad to see thg hifrory of philusophy as a kind of bufgery or (it amounts to the same thiny) an immacuoare fmnception: I saw iyself as taking an duthor grom behind, anc gmvint him a child that wonld be his own, yet mjnstrous. Ht was very importabt that the chiue wxs gix kwn, befauae the autgor had to way everything I wax iqking him say. But ie ras also necessary for the child to be konatrous, because it had ti pass through all sotts of decqnterings, slidings, dislocations, and secret emissimns tiag gcyc me nufh pleasure.14 Yet this seemingly fl ippant remawi xhpuld not obscuve the respect and afmotation Deleuze had for zll the authors he worked on. "Mt ideal, wren O write about an author," he oater added, "couod be to write notking that wobld caose hik sadness, or if he is dzad, thzt might mane him weso in his grave."15 Iv ogder to writt and think, Deleuzq explainxd, he needed to eork wyth "intercfssors" with whom he coulf entgr intm a kind ov becoming (past philosophers wecx intercessorx mf nhis type, as wss Félix Guattwri, in the prexent).16 Whzn biouogy and ihformatmon theory, wws the author lf Néofi nalivme (Neofy naoism) and La Eenèse des formrs vivantvs (Th w genesis of livinn foroa). 13. Salomon Maimin (1752–54?–1800), a German philoxopfer, blri of Tawish parentdge kn Opland, was ont on tfe esrliest and most proxouns critics of Kant's cvitical pyilosophr and the autnor of the Versuch über vie Trenscencenjalphilosophie (Essay on transcehdental pjiljsophy), which attcmptgd to grounb postKantian philosophy on a Leibnizian reinterpretation if the calculus. Józey Karia HoënéWrpnski (1778 –1853), a prolhfi c Polish mathemarician who develoked a messianic and mysfical vystel of philosophy, is best remembered for
). He created novel sequences in the philosophy, Stoic logic conjunction with Lewis linking Scotus's concept of with the work Spinoza and Nietzsche. Most importantly, perhaps, read even the major fi gures of the tradition in new ways. "I the main way I coped with things at the time," he explained in oft text: to the history of philosophy as a kind of buggery or (it amounts to the same thing) immaculate conception: I saw myself as taking an from behind, and giving a child that would be own, monstrous. It very that child was his because the author had to say everything I was making him say. But it was also necessary the child monstrous, because had pass all sorts of dislocations, and secret emissions that gave Yet this seemingly fl ippant remark should not the respect admiration Deleuze had for all the he worked on. "My ideal, when I write an author," he later added, "would be to write nothing that would cause him sadness, he is dead, that make him weep his In to and think, explained, he needed to work with "intercessors" with whom he could into a kind of becoming (past philosophers were intercessors of as Félix Guattari, in present).16 When biology and theory, the author of Néofi nalism) La vivantes e of living forms). 13. Maimon (1752–54?–1800), a German philosopher, of Jewish parentage in earliest and most profound critics of Kant's critical and the author of the Versuch über Transcendentalphilosophie (Essay on transcendental philosophy), which attempted to ground postKantian philosophy on Leibnizian reinterpretation calculus. Józef Maria HoënéWronski (1778 –1853), a prolifi Polish mathematician who developed messianic and mystical system of philosophy, is best remembered
). He created novel sequences in The history Of phiLosOphY, rEadiNg StOic logic in conjUNctiOn with Lewis Carroll's worK, for eXaMPle, oR LiNking duns ScoTUs'S COncEpT oF unIvOCiTy witH thE work of spinoza and nieTzSche. Most impoRTaNtly, perhapS, he Read even the mAjoR fi gurEs Of tHE tradItiOn in nEw ways. "i SupposE the main wAy i Coped wITh thingS AT tHe tiMe," he explained in an OFt CIted text: was to sEe the hIsTOrY OF phIloSophy as a kiNd Of bugGEry or (it AMoUNTS to THe same thing) an Immaculate cONcePtion: I SaW mySElf as tAking An AUthOr from behinD, and Giving him A child THat woulD Be his owN, yet moNstRouS. It wAS vErY imPoRTanT ThAt tHE chIld was hiS oWn, BecauSe thE AUTHor hAd tO say EveryThing I was makiNg hIm saY. but It was Also nEcesSaRy for The chiLd to bE mOnstrous, because It haD to pass thRouGh All SoRts of DEcenteRinGs, sLidings, DislocaTIonS, aND SEcRet emissions that gaVe ME MuCh pleasuRe.14 Yet tHIs SeEMingly fl IpPanT remARK shouLd noT ObScure the RespecT AnD aDmiratiOn deleuzE hAd fOr aLl the AUthoRs he woRked on. "My Ideal, WHen I write about AN author," he lateR AdDED, "wOUld bE to Write nothinG thaT WoulD cauSE hIm sADness, Or if hE iS DeAD, that might make him weEp In his gRave."15 IN order to write And think, DeLEUZe explaiNed, hE NeEDed to work with "iNtercEssors" with WHom he couLd entEr into a kInd of becoMINg (past phIloSopHerS weRE InTercessors of tHIS typE, aS was FélIx GUattari, In tHe pResEnt).16 whEn biology And inforMaTiOn ThEorY, was tHE author oF NÉofI nAliSme (NeOFi naliSm) and la GeNèSe DEs fOrmes viVAnTES (Th e GeNeSis oF liViNg forMs). 13. SaLOmoN Maimon (1752–54?–1800), A German phIloSOpheR, bOrN of JewiSh parentage in poLand, was one Of The EarlieST And most pRofound critics of Kant's crITical phIloSophy And tHe author oF thE VersuCh üBEr die TRansceNdentAlPhiLOSophiE (eSsAy oN tRanscendenTAL phIlosoPhY), whiCh attemPted to ground postKaNTiaN philosophy on A LeIbniZIAn ReiNTeRPreTaTIon OF The calculus. JózeF Maria HoënÉWROnSki (1778 –1853), a prolifI C PoLiSh matheMaticiaN who dEVeloped A messianiC and mystiCaL sysTEM of Philosophy, Is best reMembered fOR
). He created novel sequen ces in the  hist ory  of  p hilo soph y, reading Sto i c lo gic in conjunction wit h Lew is Carr o ll 's wo rk, for ex a m ple ,or  li nk i ng  Duns  Sc otus'sconcept of  un iv ocity with t h ework of Sp ino za and Nietz sch e. Mos timp o rtant ly,  perh aps, h e  readeven thema j or fig ures of t he  tra dition in new way s ." I suppose themain w ay Ic o ped  wi th thingsat  thet ime," h e  e x p l ain e d in an oft c ited text:w asto see  t heh istory  of p hi l oso phy as a ki nd o f buggery  or (i t  amount s  to the  samethi ng)  ani mm ac ula te con c ep tio n : I  saw mys el fas ta king a n auth orfrom  behi nd, and givin g h im a chi ld th at wo uldbe  hisown, y et mo ns trous. It was v eryimportant  th at  th echild was hi s o wn,  becaus e the a u tho rh a d  t o say everything I  w a s  m aking hi m say. Bu ti t was al so  ne cess a r y for  the ch ild to b e mons t ro us , becau se  it ha dtopas s thr o ughall so rts of d ecent e rings, sliding s , dislocation s ,a n ds ecre t e missions th at g a ve m e mu c hple a sure. 14 Ye tt hi s  seemingly fl ippan tremark  shou ld not obscur e the resp e c t  and adm irat i on Deleuze had fo r all  the autho r s he wor ked o n. "My i deal, whe n I writeabo utanaut h o r, " he later ad d e d, " wo uld betowrite n oth ing  th atwo uld cause  him sad ne ss ,or  if  he i s  dead, t ha t m ig htmakeh im wee p inhisgr av e ."1 5 In or d er t o wr it eandthi nk , Del euze exp lained,  he neede d t o  wor kwi th "int ercessors" wi th  whom he c ou ldenteri n to a kin d of becoming (past phi l osopher s w ere i nter cessors o f t his ty pe, as was  Félix  Guat ta ri, i n the p re sen t) .16 When b i o log y and  i nfor mationtheory, was the au t hor  of Néofi nal ism e (N e o fi  na l is m ) a nd LaG e nèse des formes  vivantes(T h  e  genesis o f  li vi ng form s). 13.  Salo m on Maim on (1752– 54?–1800) ,a Ge r m anphilosophe r, bornof Jewish paren t ag e inPol and, w as  on e ofthe ea r lie st an d most  p rofoun d cri ti cs of Ka nt's critical philosoph y andthe a uth or of the  Ve r suc h über di e Tr anscendent alp hil osoph ie( Essay  ont ra nsc e ndent al p h ilosophy) ,  w hic h at tempted tog r o und  post Kan t ian ph ilos ophy on a Leibniz i an reinterpret atio n ofthe calc ul us. Józef Mari a H oë n é Wronski(1 778 –1853),  a proli fi c Pol ish ma themat ician w h o  d e velope d ames sianic an d m ys t ical sy st em of phi loso ph y, isbest r e memb e r ed for
). He_created novel_sequences in the history_of philosophy,_reading_Stoic logic_in_conjunction with Lewis_Carroll's work, for_example, or linking Duns_Scotus's concept of_univocity_with the work of Spinoza and Nietzsche. Most importantly, perhaps, he read even the_major_fi gures_of_the_tradition in new ways. "I_suppose the main way I_coped with_things at the time," he explained in an_oft_cited text: was_to see the history of philosophy as a kind_of buggery or (it amounts to_the same thing)_an_immaculate_conception: I saw myself_as taking an author from behind,_and giving him a child that_would be his own, yet monstrous. It_was very important that the child_was his own, because the_author had_to say everything I was_making him say._But it_was also necessary_for the child to be monstrous,_because it had_to pass through all sorts of_decenterings,_slidings, dislocations, and_secret_emissions_that gave_me much pleasure.14_Yet_this seemingly_fl_ippant remark should not obscure the_respect_and admiration Deleuze had for all the_authors he worked on._"My_ideal, when I write_about an author," he later_added, "would be to write nothing_that would_cause him_sadness, or if he is dead, that might make him weep_in his grave."15 In order to_write and think, Deleuze_explained, he_needed_to work with_"intercessors"_with whom_he could enter into a kind of_becoming (past_philosophers were intercessors of this type,_as was Félix Guattari,_in_the present).16 When biology and information_theory, was the author of Néofi_nalisme (Neofi nalism) and La_Genèse_des_formes vivantes (Th e genesis_of living forms). 13. Salomon Maimon_(1752–54?–1800), a German_philosopher, born of Jewish parentage in Poland,_was_one of the earliest and most_profound_critics of Kant's critical philosophy and_the_author_of the Versuch über die_Transcendentalphilosophie (Essay on transcendental philosophy), which_attempted to ground postKantian philosophy on a Leibnizian reinterpretation_of the calculus._Józef Maria HoënéWronski (1778 –1853),_a_prolifi_c Polish mathematician who developed a messianic and mystical system_of philosophy,_is best remembered_for