 symmetry of the two directions of time. The latter symmetry breaking starts time at the moment: t=0. The nothing explodes (or "Nothing explodes") by itself by taking away, as the History of Being. The creation might be a decrease rather than an increase. The common point of view surrounding the creation or the being is the opposite. Creation should add rather than take away. The being should ostensibly be more than nothing. On the contrary, the creation is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease of nothing: it is a deficiency in relation to nothing. An image of this could be a sculptor who takes away from the stone with his chisel. Time and its "arrow" take away, for the other direction of time is removed. Time and its "arrow" are the way from that diminishing or incompleteness to nothing. One may represent the nothing as the unification of both directions of time. However, only the one, forward in time, is real. The other one, backward in time, is taken away from the nothing. After the one direction of time has been taken away from that 167Why anything rather than nothing? nothing, what remains is the being. If one could add the reverse direction of time to the being, only the nothing would be obtained. The concept of transformation into nothing exists in physics as that of "annihilation". "Annihilation" in physics means the fusion of a particle and its antiparticle into light. So, the light (electromagnetic radiation) is the way for us to see the nothing from our viewpoint of the being (i.e. less than nothing). This is the reason for the nothing to be regarded as something: namely as light, but only from our point of view, which is that of "less than nothing". One might try to interpret some ideas about the "Creation", borrowed from the Bible (Genesis 1: 3-4), from a physics point of view: "And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness" 16. Our reading of the "light" in both Bible and the theory of relativity is the following: we see the nothing as light because we ourselves are less than nothing. Indeed, the light is an absolute upper border or limit for all being, just as the theory of relativity states. To be nothing, to be an upper border, is only another way of saying that the being
symmetry of the two directions of time. The latter symmetry breakage start time at the moment: t=0. The nothing explode (or " Nothing explode ") by itself by taking away, as the History of Being. The universe might be a decrease quite than an increase. The coarse point of view wall the creation or the being is the reverse. initiation should add rather than take away. The being should apparently be more than nothing. On the contrary, the creation is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease of nothing: it is a insufficiency in relation to nothing. An image of this could be a sculptor who take off from the stone with his chisel. prison term and its " arrow " take away, for the other management of time is removed. Time and its " arrow " are the way from that diminishing or incompleteness to nothing. One may present the nothing as the unification of both directions of time. However, only the one, forward in time, is real. The other one, backward in time, is taken aside from the nothing. After the one direction of time has been take aside from that 167Why anything rather than nothing? nothing, what remains is the being. If one could lend the reverse direction of time to the being, merely the nothing would be obtained. The concept of transformation into nothing exists in physics as that of " annihilation ". " Annihilation " in physics means the fusion of a atom and its antiparticle into light. So, the light (electromagnetic radiation) is the way for us to see the nothing from our viewpoint of the organism (i.e. less than nothing). This is the rationality for the nothing to be regarded as something: namely as light, but only from our point of horizon, which is that of " less than nothing ". One might try to interpret some ideas about the " Creation ", borrowed from the Bible (Genesis 1: 3 - 4), from a physics point of view: " And God read, " Let there be light, " and there was light. And God saw that the luminosity was good. And God branch the light from the dark " 16. Our reading of the " light " in both Bible and the hypothesis of relativity is the following: we see the nothing as light because we ourselves are less than nothing. Indeed, the light is an absolute upper border or limit for all being, just as the theory of relativity states. To be nothing, to be an upper border, is only another way of state that the being
 sylmetry of the two directlons of time. The latter symmefry breaying starts time at the momeit: t=0. The bothing explodes (or "Noghing exppodes") by itstlf by taking awab, as the Histodn of Yemng. The creatiok might be d decrease ratvef chan an increase. The common point of view sirgounding the cteatipg or nht being is the opposite. Creation ahould edd rather than take away. The being shoulf oshensibly be more tjan nothing. On eye contrary, ghe creation is not an increase of nothing, but the dezreasz of nothint: ut lv a deficieicy in relation to nothing. An imabe of this coukd ue a sculptor who takes axay from the stone wyth his cviael. Time and its "qreow" tdke dway, dor tht ovhed direftikn of time is removed. Time and its "arrow" awv the way froj that dyminishing or incompleteness to nothing. Ons may represent the notying as the unificatiln of botr directions of time. However, only the one, forward in tmmd, iw veal. Rhf other one, backward in time, is taken away frjj uhe nothing. After the one diteftojn of time har been taien away from that 167Why anithing rather tran mothing? nothing, what remainw is the beiug. Uf one could add tke reverse dnrectipn of time to the being, only the nothing wokld be obfxined. The concepg on tsansformation into nothing exists ii phyxics as thaj of "angihilation". "Annimhlation" in physics meand dhe fusion of a particle and its antipartmrle into lighj. Sm, tve light (elecbromagnetic radyation) is the cay for bs to ree the nonhing frok our viewpjint of the balng (i.e. less vhan nothyng). Rhis is the feason for the nothing no be eegarded as somethlng: nxjely as light, bbu obly from our poont of vpew, wrhch is that mf "ldss yhan vothing". One oighy try to interpret smme jdeas about the "Crrabion", borriwed froi the Bible (Grnesis 1: 3-4), from a phjsics pomnt of vigw: "And God said, "Let there be lifht," and tjerc was light. Agd Gid saw that che light was good. And God separated the light from the daekness" 16. Our reading pf the "lighv" in bjth Bible and the theory of rwlativity is the nollowing: we see the nkthing as llght because we ourselves are less than nothing. Indeed, the light is an abwolute upper borded or limin fjx all bqing, oust as the theorj of relativity states. To be notiing, to be au upper border, is only anothet day of saying that the being
symmetry of the two directions of time. symmetry starts time the moment: t=0. explodes") itself by taking as the History Being. The creation might be a rather than an increase. The common point of view surrounding the creation or being is the opposite. Creation should add rather than take away. The being ostensibly more nothing. the contrary, the creation is not an increase of nothing, but the decrease of nothing: it a deficiency in relation to nothing. An image this could be a who takes away from the with chisel. Time its take for the other of time is removed. Time and its "arrow" are the way from that diminishing or incompleteness to One may nothing as unification both of time. However, one, forward in time, is real. backward in time, is taken away from the After the direction of time has been taken from that 167Why anything rather than nothing? nothing, remains is the being. If one could add the reverse direction of time to the the nothing would be The concept of into exists physics that of "Annihilation" in physics means the fusion of a particle and its into light. So, the light (electromagnetic radiation) is the way to the nothing from viewpoint of the being less nothing). This is the the to something: as but only from our of view, which is that "less than nothing". One ideas about the "Creation", borrowed from the Bible 1: 3-4), from a physics point of "And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. And saw that was good. And God separated the light from darkness" 16. Our reading the "light" in both Bible and the theory of is following: we the nothing as because we ourselves less than nothing. light is absolute border all being, just as the theory relativity To be nothing, to be upper only another way of saying that the being
 symmetry of the two directionS of time. The LatteR syMmeTrY breAkinG starts time at tHE momEnt: t=0. The nothing explodes (Or "NotHiNG expLOdEs") by iTself by TAkING awAy, As The hiSToRy of BEinG. The creAtion might Be a DeCrease rather THaN an increasE. ThE common point Of vIew surRoUndINg the CreAtion Or the bEIng is tHe oppositE. CREation SHould adD RAtHer tHan take away. The beiNG sHOuld ostensibly Be more ThAN nOTHinG. On The contrarY, tHe creATion is nOT aN INCreASe of nothing, buT the decreasE Of nOthing: It Is a DEficieNcy in ReLAtiOn to nothing. an imAge of this Could bE A sculptOR who takEs away FroM thE stoNE wItH hiS cHIseL. tiMe aND itS "arrow" taKe AwAy, for The oTHER DireCtiOn of Time iS removed. Time aNd iTs "arROw" aRe the Way frOm thAt DiminIshing Or incOmPleteness to nothIng. ONe may reprEseNt The NoThing AS the unIfiCatIon of boTh direcTIonS oF TIMe. however, only the one, fOrWARd In time, is Real. ThE OtHeR One, backwArD in Time, IS Taken Away FRoM the nothIng. AftER tHe One direCtIon of tImE haS beEn takEN awaY from tHat 167Why anYthinG Rather than nothINg? nothing, what REmAINs IS the BeiNg. If one coulD add THe reVersE DiRecTIon of Time tO tHE bEIng, only the nothing woUlD be obtAined. the concept of tRansformatION Into nothIng eXIsTS in physics as thAt of "aNnihilatioN". "annihilaTion" iN physics Means the fUSIon of a paRtiCle And Its ANTiParticle into lIGHt. So, ThE light (eLecTromagnEtiC raDiaTioN) iS the way foR us to see ThE nOtHiNg fRom ouR ViewpoinT oF thE bEinG (i.e. leSS than nOthinG). ThiS iS tHE reAson for THe NOThinG tO bE regArdEd As somEthiNG: naMely as lIght, but onLy fROm ouR pOiNt of vieW, which is that oF "lEss than notHiNg". ONe mighT TRy to inteRpret some ideas about the "CREation", bOrrOwed fRom tHe Bible (GeNesIs 1: 3-4), from A phYSics poInt of vIew: "AnD GOd sAID, "Let tHERe Be lIgHt," and there WAS liGht. AnD GOd saW that thE light was good. And GoD SepArated the lighT frOm thE DArKneSS" 16. OUR reAdINg oF THe "light" in both BiBle and the tHeORy Of relativiTY is ThE followIng: we seE the nOThing as Light becaUse we oursElVes aRE LesS than nothiNg. Indeed, The light iS An absOLuTe uppEr bOrder oR lImiT for aLl beinG, JusT as thE theorY oF relatIvity StAtes. To be Nothing, to be an upper bordeR, is onlY anotHer Way of sayiNg tHAt tHe being
 symmetry of the two direc tions of t ime.The  la tt er s ymme try breaking s t arts  time at the moment: t =0. T he noth i ng  expl odes (o r  " N o thi ng  e xpl od e s" ) byits elf bytaking awa y,as  the History of  Being. Th e c reation migh t b e a de cr eas e  rath erthanan inc r ease.The commo np oint o f  view s u r ro undi ng the creation o r  t h e being is the  oppos it e .C r eat ion  should ad drathe r  than t a ke a w ay. The being sho uld ostensi b lybe mor etha n  nothi ng. O nt hecontrary, t he c reation i s nota n incre a se of n othing , b utthed ec re ase  o f  no t hi ng: itis a def ic ie ncy i n re l a t i on t o n othi ng. A n image of th iscoul d  be  a sc ulpto r wh otakes  awayfromth e stone with hi s ch isel. Tim e a nd  it s"arro w " take  aw ay,  for th e other dir ec t i o nof time is removed .T i me  and its  "arro w "ar e  the way  f rom  tha t dimin ishi n gor incom pleten e ss  t o nothi ng . Onema y r epr esent thenothin g as the  unif i cation of both directions of ti m e .H owev er,  only the o ne,f orwa rd i n  t ime ,  is r eal.Th e  o t her one, backward i ntime,is ta ken away from  the nothi n g .  After t he o n ed irection of ti me ha s been tak e n away f rom t hat 167W hy anythi n g  rathertha n n oth ing ? no thing, what r e m ains  i s the b ein g. If o necou ldadd  t he revers e direct io nof  t ime  to t h e being,  o nly  t henothi n g woul d beobta in ed .  Th e conce p to f  tra ns fo rmat ion  i nto n othi n g e xists i n physics  as that  o f"annihi lation". "Ann ih ilation" i nphy sics m e a ns the f usion of a particle and its ant ipa rticl e in to light.  So , thelig h t (ele ctroma gneti crad i a tion) i sthe  w ay for ust o  se e the  n othi ng from  our viewpoint oft hebeing (i.e. l ess  tha n no thi n g) .  Th is ist h e reason for th e nothingto be  regardeda s s om ething:  namely  as l i ght, bu t only fr om our po in t of v iew , which is  that of  "less th a n not h in g". O nemighttr y t o int erpret som e ide as abo ut  the " Creat io n", borr owed from the Bible (Ge nesis1: 3- 4),  from a p hys i cspoint ofview : "And God  sa id,  "Let  th e re be  lig h t, " a n d the re w a s light.A nd  Go d sa w that thel i g htwas g ood .  And G od s eparated the ligh t  from the dark ness " 16.  Ou r  rea di ng of the "lig ht"  i n both Bib le  and the th eory ofre l ativi ty isthe fo llowing : we see th e no thi ng as lig htbe c ause we  o ur s elvesarele ss tha n noth i ng.I n deed, the lightis an a bsolu t e u pperbo rder or limi t for allbeing, just  as th e th eoryof rela ti vity s tat es . To be no t hing, tobe an  upperbo rder , i s only  ano t h er wa y of  s ayi ng that t h e  b e in g
 symmetry_of the_two directions of time._The latter_symmetry_breaking starts_time_at the moment:_t=0. The nothing_explodes (or "Nothing explodes")_by itself by_taking_away, as the History of Being. The creation might be a decrease rather than_an_increase. The_common_point_of view surrounding the creation_or the being is the_opposite. Creation_should add rather than take away. The being_should_ostensibly be more_than nothing. On the contrary, the creation is not_an increase of nothing, but the_decrease of nothing:_it_is_a deficiency in relation_to nothing. An image of this_could be a sculptor who takes_away from the stone with his chisel._Time and its "arrow" take away,_for the other direction of_time is_removed. Time and its "arrow"_are the way_from that_diminishing or incompleteness_to nothing. One may represent the_nothing as the_unification of both directions of time._However,_only the one,_forward_in_time, is_real. The other_one,_backward in_time,_is taken away from the nothing._After_the one direction of time has been_taken away from that_167Why_anything rather than nothing?_nothing, what remains is the_being. If one could add the_reverse direction_of time_to the being, only the nothing would be obtained. The concept_of transformation into nothing exists in_physics as that of_"annihilation". "Annihilation"_in_physics means the_fusion_of a_particle and its antiparticle into light. So,_the light_(electromagnetic radiation) is the way for_us to see the_nothing_from our viewpoint of the being_(i.e. less than nothing). This is_the reason for the nothing_to_be_regarded as something: namely as_light, but only from our point_of view, which_is that of "less than nothing". One_might_try to interpret some ideas about_the_"Creation", borrowed from the Bible (Genesis_1:_3-4),_from a physics point of_view: "And God said, "Let there_be light," and there was light. And God saw_that the light_was good. And God separated_the_light_from the darkness" 16. Our reading of the "light" in_both Bible_and the theory_of relativity is the following: we see the nothing as_light because we ourselves are less than_nothing. Indeed, the light is an absolute upper border or limit_for all being, just as the theory of_relativity states. To be nothing, to be_an upper border, is_only_another way of saying that the being