Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o f technology (pp. 25-33). Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. Dumciene, A., Daukilas, S., & Sipaviciene, S. (2008, June). Axiological logic in the means of e-teaching product interactivity. Proceedings o f the IT I2008 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia. Retrieved from http://hnk.ffzg.hr/bibl/iti2008/ Edward, T. (2010). Technophilia's big tent: What technology wants. Issues in Science & Technology, 27(1), 92-94. Eiger, T. (2009). Critical realism. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia o f case study research. Retrieved from http://sage-ereference.com Elliot, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to recognize a quality grounded theory research study. Australian Journal o f Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48-52. Ellul, J. (2010). The autonomy of technology. In C. Hanks (Ed.), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 67-75). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Erkunt, J. (2010). Emergence of epistemic agency in college level educational technology course for pre-service teachers engaged in CSCL. The Turkish Online Journal o f Educational Technology, 9(3), 38-51. Ermer, G. E. (2009). Guiding technological development: An analysis o f Borgmann's device paradigm. In Proceedings from 2009 Christian Engineering Education Conference (44-56). Waco, Texas: Calvin College. Retrieved from http://www.calvin.edu/academic/engineering/ces/ceec/2009/CEEC2009proceedin gs.pdf Fallman, D. (2010). A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann's philosophy of technology and human-computer interaction. A l & Society, 25(1), 53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1 Fallman, D. (2011). The new good: Exploring the potential o f philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. Proceedings o f CHI 2011, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC
Ed .), Readings in the philosophy o f technology (pp. 25 - 33). Plymouth, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. Dumciene, A., Daukilas, S., & Sipaviciene, S. (2008, June). Axiological logic in the mean of east - teaching product interactivity. Proceedings oxygen f the IT I2008 thirtieth International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia. Retrieved from http://hnk.ffzg.hr/bibl/iti2008/ Edward, T. (2010). Technophilia's big tent: What engineering wants. Issues in Science & Technology, 27(1), 92 - 94. Eiger, T. (2009). Critical realism. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (Eds .), Encyclopedia oxygen f subject study inquiry. Retrieved from http://sage-ereference.com Elliot, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to recognize a quality grounded hypothesis research study. Australian Journal oxygen f Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48 - 52. Ellul, J. (2010). The autonomy of engineering. In C. Hanks (Ed .), engineering and values: Essential readings (pp. 67 - 75). West Sussex, UK: Wiley - Blackwell. Erkunt, J. (2010). Emergence of epistemic means in college level educational technology course for pre - service teachers prosecute in CSCL. The Turkish Online Journal o f Educational Technology, 9(3), 38 - 51. Ermer, G. E. (2009). Guiding technological development: An analysis oxygen f Borgmann's device paradigm. In Proceedings from 2009 Christian Engineering Education Conference (44 - 56). Waco, Texas: Calvin College. Retrieved from http://www.calvin.edu/academic/engineering/ces/ceec/2009/CEEC2009proceedin gs.pdf Fallman, D. (2010). A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann's philosophy of engineering and human - calculator interaction. A l & Society, 25(1), 53 - 60. doi: 10.1007 / s00146 - 009 - 0234 - 1 Fallman, D. (2011). The modern good: Exploring the potential o f philosophy of technology to contribute to human - calculator interaction. proceeding o f CHI 2011, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC
Ed.), Geadings in the philosopmy o f technologi (pp. 25-33). Plbmouth, HK: Rowmav and Littlefield. Dumciene, A., Dqukilqs, S., & Sipaviciene, S. (2008, Jjne). Axiollgical ligic un the meaia of e-tccchinf proburt interactiviti. Proceedingv o f the IT I2008 30tf Nnternational Conference on Informatyon Tecnnllogy Interfacgs, Cantwt, Cdoatia. Retrieved from http://hnk.ffzg.hd/bibl/itp2008/ Edward, T. (2010). Technpphilia's big tent: What tecjnollgy wants. Issues ij Science & Jschgilogy, 27(1), 92-94. Eigef, T. (2009). Critibcl realism. Jn A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (Dds.), Eucyclopedia o f fdse study rxsearcr. Retrieved ngom htt[://sage-errference.com Elkiov, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to cecognize a quality drounded dhzory research study. Aysrralidn Jmurnxo o f Zdtanded Nugsiig, 22(3), 48-52. Ellul, N. (2010). The autobomy of technology. On B. Hanks (Ed.), Tedhnolody and values: Essential readings (pp. 67-75). West Suasex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Wrkunt, J. (2010). Emergence ov epistemyc agency in college level educational technology courad fir oee-dervice teachers engaged in CSCL. The Turkish Jhlonv Journal o f Edugational Technologu, 9(3), 38-51. Rtmer, G. E. (2009). Guidkng teegnklogical developmejt: An agalysus o f Bowgmamn's device paradigm. In Procwedings from 2009 Christian Engineexing Educatiun Cpnferrnce (44-56). Waco, Texas: Calvin Colmege. Retrieged from ggtp://www.calvin.edu/azadvmic/angineering/ces/ceec/2009/CEEC2009procqedin gs.pvf Faklman, D. (2010). A cifferqnt way of seeikc: Albert Borgmann's phillsmphy of tefhnology and human-computer intecection. A l & Spchetj, 25(1), 53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1 Fallkan, D. (2011). The ner good: Exploriug the pjtentkal o f phplosophy mf technolody to contribgje to human-cokputer igterqctiin. Procdddings o f CHI 2011, Confereuee on Humqn Factors in Compmting Aystems, Vancouvzx, VC
Ed.), Readings in the philosophy o f 25-33). UK: Rowman Littlefield. Dumciene, A., (2008, Axiological logic in means of e-teaching interactivity. Proceedings o f the IT 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia. Retrieved from http://hnk.ffzg.hr/bibl/iti2008/ Edward, (2010). Technophilia's big tent: What technology wants. Issues in Science & Technology, 27(1), Eiger, (2009). realism. A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia o f case study research. Retrieved from Elliot, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to a quality grounded theory study. Australian Journal o f Nursing, 48-52. Ellul, (2010). autonomy technology. In C. (Ed.), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 67-75). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Erkunt, J. (2010). Emergence of agency in educational technology for teachers in CSCL. The Journal o f Educational Technology, 9(3), E. (2009). Guiding technological development: An analysis o Borgmann's device In Proceedings from 2009 Christian Engineering Conference (44-56). Waco, Texas: Calvin College. Retrieved from gs.pdf Fallman, D. (2010). A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann's philosophy of technology and A l & Society, 53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1 D. The good: the potential f philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. Proceedings o CHI 2011, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver,
Ed.), Readings in the philosophy O f technoloGy (pp. 25-33). PLymOutH, Uk: RowMan aNd Littlefield. DUMcieNe, A., Daukilas, S., & SipavicienE, S. (2008, JunE). AXIoloGIcAl logIc in the MEaNS Of e-TeAcHinG pROdUct inTerActivitY. ProceedinGs o F tHe IT I2008 30th InterNAtIonal ConfeRenCe on InformatIon technoLoGy INTerfaCes, cavtaT, CroatIA. RetriEved from hTtP://Hnk.ffzG.Hr/bibl/iTI2008/ edWard, t. (2010). Technophilia's big TEnT: what technology Wants. ISsUEs IN sciEncE & TechnologY, 27(1), 92-94. EIger, T. (2009). cRitical REaLISM. In a. j. Mills, G. DurepoS, E. Wiebe (Eds.), ENCycLopediA o F caSE study ReseaRcH. retRieved from hTtp://sAge-ereferEnce.coM elliot, N., & lAzenbatT, A. (2005). How tO reCogNize A QuAlIty GrOUndED tHeoRY reSearch stUdY. AUstraLian jOURNal o F AdVancEd NurSing, 22(3), 48-52. Ellul, J. (2010). The AutOnomY Of tEchnoLogy. IN C. HaNkS (Ed.), TeChnoloGy and VaLues: Essential reAdinGs (pp. 67-75). West SUssEx, uK: WIlEy-BlaCKwell. ERkuNt, J. (2010). emergenCe of epiSTemIc AGENcY in college level eduCaTIOnAl technoLogy coURsE fOR pre-servIcE teAcheRS EngagEd in csCl. The TurkIsh OnlINe joUrnal o f edUcatioNaL TeChnOlogy, 9(3), 38-51. eRmer, g. E. (2009). GuidIng technOlogiCAl development: AN Analysis o f BorGMaNN'S dEVice ParAdigm. In ProcEediNGs frOm 2009 ChRIsTiaN enginEerinG EDUcATion Conference (44-56). Waco, TExAs: CalvIn ColLege. Retrieved From http://wwW.CALvin.edu/aCadeMIc/ENgineering/ces/cEec/2009/CEeC2009proceediN Gs.pdf FalLman, D. (2010). a differeNt way of seEINg: Albert borGmaNn's PhiLOSoPhy of technoloGY And hUmAn-compuTer InteracTioN. A l & socIetY, 25(1), 53-60. dOi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1 FallmaN, D. (2011). The new GoOd: exPlOriNg the POtential O f PhiLoSopHy of tEChnoloGy to cOntrIbUtE To hUman-comPUtER InteRaCtIon. PRocEeDings O f CHi 2011, conFerence On Human FaCtoRS in COmPuTing SysTems, Vancouver, bC
Ed.), Readings in the phil osophy o f  tech nol ogy  ( pp.25-3 3). Plymouth,U K: R owman and Littlefield.  Dumc ie n e, A . ,Dauki las, S. ,  & S ipa vi ci ene ,S .(2008 , J une). A xiological  lo gi c in the mea n sof e-teach ing  product int era ctivit y.  Pr o ceedi ngs  o fthe IT I200830th Inte rn a tional Confere n c eon I nformation Techno l og y  Interfaces, C avtat,  C r oa t i a.Ret rieved fro mhttp: / /hnk.ff z g. h r / bib l /iti2008/ Edw ard, T. (20 1 0).  Techn op hil i a's bi g ten t: Wha t technolog y wa nts. Issu es inS cience&  Techno logy,27( 1),  92- 9 4.  E ige r, T.( 20 09) .  Cr itical r ea li sm. I n A. J . Mill s,G. D urepo s, E. Wiebe ( Eds .),E ncy clope dia o  f c as e stu dy res earch .Retrieved fromhttp ://sage-e ref er enc e. com E l liot,N.,  &Lazenba tt, A.( 200 5) . H ow  to recognize a qu al i t ygrounded  theor y  r es e arch stu dy . A ustr a l ian J ourn a lo f Adva nced N u rs in g, 22(3 ),  48-52 .Ell ul,  J. ( 2 010) . Theautonomy  of t e chnology. In C .  Hanks (Ed.), Te c h no l ogyand  values: Es sent i al r eadi n gs  (p p . 67- 75).We s tS ussex, UK: Wiley-Bl ac kwell.  Erku nt, J. (2010) . Emergenc e o f episte mica ge n cy in collegelevel  education a l techno logycourse f or pre-se r v ice teac her s e nga ged i nCSCL. The Tur k i sh O nl ine Jou rna l o f E duc ati ona l T ec hnology,9(3), 38 -5 1.  E rm er,  G. E .  (2009).  G uid in g t echno l ogical  deve lopm en t: Ananalysi s  o f  Bor gm an n'sdev ic e par adig m . I n Proce edings fr om2 009Ch ri stian E ngineering Ed uc ation Conf er enc e (44- 5 6 ). Waco,  Texas: Calvin College. Retriev edfromhttp ://www.ca lvi n.edu/ aca d emic/e nginee ring/ ce s/c e e c/200 9 / CE EC2 00 9proceedin g s.p df Fa ll man,  D. (20 10). A different w a y o f seeing: Alb ert  Bor g m an n's ph i los op h y o f technology andhuman-comp ut e rinteractio n . A  l  & Soci ety, 25 (1),5 3-60. d oi: 10.10 07/s00146 -0 09-0 2 3 4-1  Fallman,D. (2011 ). The ne w  good :  E xplor ing  the p ot ent ial o  f phi l oso phy o f tech no logy t o con tr ibute to  human-computer interac tion.Proce edi ngs o f C HI2 011 , Confere nceon Human F act ors  in C omp u tingSyst e ms , V a ncouv er,B C
Ed.), Readings_in the_philosophy o f technology_(pp. 25-33)._Plymouth,_UK: Rowman_and_Littlefield. Dumciene, A.,_Daukilas, S., &_Sipaviciene, S. (2008, June)._Axiological logic in_the_means of e-teaching product interactivity. Proceedings o f the IT I2008 30th International Conference_on_Information Technology_Interfaces,_Cavtat,_Croatia. Retrieved from http://hnk.ffzg.hr/bibl/iti2008/ Edward,_T. (2010). Technophilia's big tent:_What technology_wants. Issues in Science & Technology, 27(1), 92-94._Eiger,_T. (2009). Critical_realism. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe_(Eds.), Encyclopedia o f case study_research. Retrieved from_http://sage-ereference.com_Elliot,_N., & Lazenbatt, A._(2005). How to recognize a quality_grounded theory research study. Australian Journal_o f Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48-52. Ellul,_J. (2010). The autonomy of technology._In C. Hanks (Ed.), Technology_and values:_Essential readings (pp. 67-75). West_Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell._Erkunt, J._(2010). Emergence of_epistemic agency in college level educational_technology course for_pre-service teachers engaged in CSCL. The_Turkish_Online Journal o_f_Educational_Technology, 9(3),_38-51. Ermer, G._E._(2009). Guiding_technological_development: An analysis o f Borgmann's_device_paradigm. In Proceedings from 2009 Christian Engineering_Education Conference (44-56). Waco,_Texas:_Calvin College. Retrieved from_http://www.calvin.edu/academic/engineering/ces/ceec/2009/CEEC2009proceedin gs.pdf Fallman, D. (2010)._A different way of seeing: Albert_Borgmann's philosophy_of technology_and human-computer interaction. A l & Society, 25(1), 53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1_Fallman, D. (2011). The new good:_Exploring the potential o_f philosophy_of_technology to contribute_to_human-computer interaction._Proceedings o f CHI 2011, Conference on_Human Factors_in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC