 entanglement turns out to be a possible source of dark matter or energy, e.g. as the corresponding equivalent mass at rest and gravitational energy. Indeed, entanglement satisfies the condition of being "dark" for it falls outside of the Standard model describing all as "visible". The explanation of dark energy by means of entanglement can be the following: The process of decoherence of any entangled state would mean the disappearance of entanglement and its degree of non-unitarity (or Lorentz non-invariance) equivalent to a certain mass (energy) in terms of general relativity. That energy can be called "energy of decoherence" therefore specific for any entangled object and "emitted" in space at any time in virtue of the decoherence itself. That energy is "pure" without 12 The usual interpretation of entanglement in terms of general relativity (e.g. Jensen, Karch 2013) is as, or by means of, a "wormhole" in space-time (Einstein, Rosen 1935). For if one means that kind of usual interpretation, any quantum leap in space-time corresponds to a certain, "straight" wormhole "through" space-time. From our viewpoint, this wormhole is equivalent to a certain curvature in spacetime (representable by a space-time tensor) and thus to a certain mass-energy (representable by an energy-momentum tensor equated to the former by the Einstein field equation) generating that space-time curvature. A certain common measure of both straight wormhole and curvature (and very roughly speaking, their length) has to be the same for that equivalence to hold. The concept, for example, of "holographic duality" means something similar in the framework encountered the interpretation of entanglement as a wormhole. 163Why anything rather than nothing? any source in the framework of the Standard model for entanglement is out of it, and therefore "dark". More than that, it is "dark" in principle as well, for it does not have any carrier in definition, originating directly from quantum information equated to a physical action by means of the Planck constant. The equivalence of gravity and entanglement by general relativity is the necessary condition for that explanation of dark energy. If this were accepted as true, dark matter would correspond to the current degree of entanglement as an equivalent amount of mass at rest which also falls outside of the Standard model, unlike the Higgs mechanism 13, and directly (non-unitarily and Lorentz non-invariantly) originates from quantum information. This means that the process of deco
entanglement turns out to be a possible source of blue topic or energy, e.g. as the correspond equivalent multitude at rest and gravitational energy. Indeed, web satisfies the condition of being " dark " for it hang outside of the Standard model describing all as " visible ". The explanation of colored energy by means of web can be the following: The process of decoherence of any entangled state would mean the disappearance of entanglement and its academic degree of non - unitarity (or Lorentz non - invariance) equivalent to a certain mass (department of energy) in terms of general relativity. That energy can be called " energy of decoherence " consequently specific for any entangled aim and " emitted " in space at any time in virtue of the decoherence itself. That department of energy is " pure " without 12 The usual interpretation of entanglement in terms of general relativity (e.g. Jensen, Karch 2013) is as, or by means of, a " wormhole " in space - time (Einstein, Rosen 1935). For if one means that kind of usual interpretation, any quantum leap in space - time corresponds to a sealed, " uncoiled " wormhole " through " space - prison term. From our point of view, this wormhole is equivalent to a certain curvature in spacetime (representable by a space - time tensor) and therefore to a certain aggregate - energy (representable by an energy - momentum tensor equated to the erstwhile by the Einstein field equation) generating that space - time curvature. A certain common measure of both straight wormhole and curvature (and very roughly speaking, their duration) has to be the like for that equality to hold. The concept, for example, of " holographic duality " means something exchangeable in the framework encountered the interpretation of web as a wormhole. 163Why anything rather than nothing? any informant in the framework of the Standard model for web is out of it, and therefore " dark ". More than that, it is " dark " in principle as well, for it does not suffer any carrier in definition, originate directly from quantum data equated to a physical legal action by means of the Planck constant. The equivalence of graveness and entanglement by general relativity is the necessary condition for that explanation of dark energy. If this were accepted as true, dark matter would correspond to the current degree of entanglement as an equivalent sum of mass at rest which besides falls outside of the Standard model, unlike the Higgs mechanism 13, and directly (non - unitarily and Lorentz non - invariantly) originates from quantum information. This means that the process of deco
 enhanglement turns out to ne a possible soorxe of vark mafter or dnergy, e.g. as the correspondiig ewuivaoent mass at rest and eravitatilnal eneegy. Mndeed, entanglemxht satisfies fme coudmtion of being "cark" for id falls outsida uf the Standard model describing all ws "visinlf". The explanatyon ps dadk energy by means of entanglement can be the followinb: The process of decoherenfe ov any entangled stwte would mgzn eye disappearxnce of enuauglement ans its degree of non-unitarity (or Loreutz non-invatnqncf) equivalent to a certain mass (energy) in terks of general velatmvitt. That energy can be ralled "energy of decjherence" dhzrefore specific for qnt entdnglad ochecg ahd "ejitted" in space at zny time in virtue of the deconewvmce itself. Tgat enqrdy is "pure" without 12 The usual interpretdtikn of entanglement in twrms of general relatlvity (e.g. Tensen, Karch 2013) is as, or by means of, a "wormhole" in vpace-vioe (Tikfgwij, Rosen 1935). For if one means that kind of usual yhttrpgetation, any quanbum leap in space-tomf vjrresponds to a cerczih, "straight" wormholf "throudh" spqce-time. Fwom pur viewpoint, this wormhole is equivaleut ro a certain curvacure in spacztime (tepresrntable by a space-time censor) and thus tl a certajv mass-energy (repfesvntatle by an energy-momentum tqnsor equeted co the furmet by thq Einstein field equation) generatijg thct spdce-time cugvature. A certain common measurx of both strsicht wormholz and gurvature (and vqry roughly spgaking, thzir levgth) has tk be thx same for trat equivalenwg to hold. The concept, for exanple, of "folographic duslity" meauf sonething similar in thg rramework encouuuertd the interpretstiun jf eitangjament as a wmrmhule. 163Ehy avything ratmer tham nothing? any source in fhe framework of tne Standare model sor entanglemrnt is out of it, ajd thxreforx "dark". Mote than that, it is "dark" in prindiple as aelj, for it doef nob hade any carxier in definition, originating directly hrom quantum informatiob equated to a physncsl action bb meanf of the [lanck constant. The wquivalence of grsvity and entanglemenf by ganerap relativity is the necessary condition for that explanation of dark enerty. If vhys were accsptec as nruz, dcrk mateer xonld correspond to the current degree of entangleoent as dn equivalent amount of mass ay fest which alro falls outside of the Atandard model, unlike the Higgs mechanixm 13, and directly (non-unitsrily ane Lorsntz non-intariantly) originates from xuantym infoematlon. This means thst the procfss pf deco
entanglement turns out to be a possible dark or energy, as the corresponding gravitational Indeed, entanglement satisfies condition of being for it falls outside of the model describing all as "visible". The explanation of dark energy by means of can be the following: The process of decoherence of any entangled state would the of and degree of non-unitarity (or Lorentz non-invariance) equivalent to a certain mass (energy) in terms of general That energy can be called "energy of decoherence" specific for any entangled and "emitted" in space at time virtue of decoherence That is "pure" without The usual interpretation of entanglement in terms of general relativity (e.g. Jensen, Karch 2013) is as, or means of, in space-time Rosen For one means that usual interpretation, any quantum leap in a certain, "straight" wormhole "through" space-time. From our this wormhole equivalent to a certain curvature in (representable by a space-time tensor) and thus to certain mass-energy (representable by an energy-momentum tensor equated to the former by the Einstein field that space-time curvature. A common measure of straight and (and roughly speaking, length) has to be the same for that equivalence to hold. concept, for example, of "holographic duality" means something similar in encountered interpretation of entanglement a wormhole. 163Why anything than any source in the the model out it, therefore "dark". More than it is "dark" in principle well, for it does definition, originating directly from quantum information equated to physical action by means of the Planck The equivalence of gravity and entanglement by general relativity is the necessary for that dark energy. If this were accepted as true, matter would correspond to current degree of entanglement as an equivalent amount of at which also outside of the model, unlike the mechanism 13, and and Lorentz originates quantum that the process of deco
 entanglement turns out to be a Possible soUrce oF daRk mAtTer oR eneRgy, e.g. as the corrESponDing equivalent mass at reSt and GrAVitaTIoNal enErgy. IndEEd, ENTanGlEmEnt SaTIsFies tHe cOnditioN of being "daRk" fOr It falls outsiDE oF the StandaRd mOdel describiNg aLl as "viSiBle". tHe expLanAtion Of dark ENergy bY means of eNtANglemeNT can be tHE FoLlowIng: The process of deCOhERence of any entaNgled sTaTE wOULd mEan The disappeArAnce oF EntanglEMeNT ANd iTS degree of non-uNitarity (or LORenTz non-iNvAriANce) equIvaleNt TO a cErtain mass (eNergY) in terms oF generAL relatiVIty. That Energy Can Be cAlleD "EnErGy oF dECohEReNce" THerEfore speCiFiC for aNy enTANGLed oBjeCt anD "emitTed" in space at aNy tIme iN VirTue of The deCoheReNce itSelf. ThAt eneRgY is "pure" without 12 THe usUal interpRetAtIon Of EntanGLement In tErmS of geneRal relaTIviTy (E.G. jEnSen, Karch 2013) is as, or by meAnS OF, a "Wormhole" In spacE-TiMe (eInstein, ROsEn 1935). FOr if ONE meanS thaT KiNd of usuaL interPReTaTion, any QuAntum lEaP in SpaCe-timE CorrEspondS to a certAin, "stRAight" wormhole "tHRough" space-timE. frOM OuR ViewPoiNt, this wormhOle iS EquiValeNT tO a cERtain CurvaTuRE iN Spacetime (representaBlE by a spAce-tiMe tensor) and thUs to a certaIN MAss-energY (repREsENtable by an enerGy-momEntum tensoR Equated tO the fOrmer by tHe EinsteiN FIeld equaTioN) geNerAtiNG ThAt space-time cuRVAturE. A Certain ComMon measUre Of bOth StrAiGht wormhoLe and curVaTuRe (AnD veRy rouGHly speakInG, thEiR leNgth) hAS to be tHe samE for ThAt EQuiValence TO hOLD. The CoNcEpt, fOr eXaMple, oF "holOGraPhic duaLity" means SomEThinG sImIlar in tHe framework enCoUntered the InTerPretatION of entanGlement as a wormhole. 163Why anYThing raTheR than NothIng? any souRce In the fRamEWork of The StaNdard MoDel FOR entaNGLeMenT iS out of it, anD THerEfore "DaRk". MoRe than tHat, it is "dark" in princIPle As well, for it doEs nOt haVE AnY caRRiER in DeFIniTIOn, originating diRectly from QuANtUm informatIOn eQuAted to a PhysicaL actiON by meanS of the PlaNck constaNt. the eQUIvaLence of graVity and eNtanglemeNT by geNErAl relAtiVity is ThE neCessaRy condITioN for tHat expLaNation Of darK eNergy. If tHis were accepted as true, daRk mattEr wouLd cOrrespond To tHE cuRrent degrEe of EntanglemeNt aS an EquivAleNT amouNt of MAsS at REst whIch aLSo falls ouTSiDe oF THe standard modEL, UNliKe the higGS mechaNism 13, And directly (non-uniTArily and LorentZ non-INVarIanTLy) orIgInates from quanTum InFORmation. THiS means that tHe procesS oF Deco
 entanglement turns out to  be a poss iblesou rce  o f da rk m atter or energ y , e. g. as the correspondin g equ iv a lent ma ss at  rest a n dg r avi ta ti ona le ne rgy.Ind eed, en tanglement  sa ti sfies the co n di tion of be ing  "dark" foritfallsou tsi d e ofthe  Stan dard m o del de scribingal l  as "v i sible". T he  exp lanation of darke ne r gy by means of  entan gl e me n t  ca n b e the foll ow ing:T he proc e ss o f  de c oherence of a ny entangle d  st ate wo ul d m e an the  disa pp e ara nce of enta ngle ment andits de g ree ofn on-unit arity(or  Lo rent z  n on -in va r ian c e)  eq u iva lent toace rtain  mas s ( e nerg y)in t ermsof general re lat ivit y . T hat e nergy  can  b e cal led "e nergy  o f decoherence"ther efore spe cif ic  fo rany e n tangle d o bje ct and"emitte d " i ns p a ce  at any time in vi rt u e  o f the de cohere n ce  i t self. Th at  en ergy i s "pu re"w it hout 12The us u al  i nterpre ta tion o fent ang lemen t  intermsof gener al re l ativity (e.g.J ensen, Karch2 01 3 )  i s  as,  or  by means o f, a "wor mhol e "ins pace- time(E i ns t ein, Rosen 1935). F or  if on e mea ns that kindof usual i n t e rpretati on,a ny quantum leap i n spa ce-time co r responds  to a  certain , "straig h t " wormho le"th rou gh" s pa ce-time. From o ur v ie wpoint,  th is worm hol e i s e qui va lent to a  certain  c ur va tu rein sp a cetime ( re pre se nta ble b y  a spa ce-ti me t en so r ) a nd thus to a  cer ta in  mas s-e ne rgy ( repr e sen table b y an ener gy- m omen tu mtensorequated to th eformer byth e E instei n field eq uation) generating that space-t ime  curv atur e. A cert ain  commo n m e asureof bot h str ai ght w ormho l e  a ndcu rvature (a n d  ve ry ro ug hlyspeakin g, their length) h a s t o be the same  fo r th a t  e qui v al e nce  t o  ho l d . The concept,for exampl e, of  "holograp h icdu ality"means s ometh i ng simi lar in th e framewo rk  enc o u nte red the in terpreta tion of e n tangl e me nt as  awormho le . 1 63Why  anyth i ngrathe r than  n othing ? any  s ource in  the framework of the S tandar d mod elfor entan gle m ent  is out o f it , and ther efo re"dark ".M ore t hant ha t,i t is"dar k " in prin c ip lea s  w ell, for it d o esnot h ave any ca rrie r in definition,o riginating dir ectl y fro m q u antu minformation eq uat ed t o a phys ic al action b y meansof the P lanckconsta nt. The e qu i valenc e of  gr avity and  en ta n glement  b yg eneral  rel at ivityis the nece s s ary condition fo r tha t expla n ati on of  d ark ene r gy.If this we re accepted  as tr ue,darkmatterwo uld co rre sp ond to the current d egree  of ent an glem ent  as an  equ i v alent  amo un t o f mass at r es t  w hi c h a lsofalls  o utsi de of the Standard  mo d el, unl ik e t h e  Higgs me c h anism 13,and  dire c t ly (non-un i tari l ya nd Lo rentznon-in variant l y)or iginate s f r o m quantum  informat i on.  T hismeans th at  the  p roc es s of deco
 entanglement_turns out_to be a possible_source of_dark_matter or_energy,_e.g. as the_corresponding equivalent mass_at rest and gravitational_energy. Indeed, entanglement_satisfies_the condition of being "dark" for it falls outside of the Standard model describing_all_as "visible"._The_explanation_of dark energy by means_of entanglement can be the_following: The_process of decoherence of any entangled state would_mean_the disappearance of_entanglement and its degree of non-unitarity (or Lorentz non-invariance)_equivalent to a certain mass (energy)_in terms of_general_relativity._That energy can be_called "energy of decoherence" therefore specific_for any entangled object and "emitted"_in space at any time in virtue_of the decoherence itself. That energy_is "pure" without 12 The_usual interpretation_of entanglement in terms of_general relativity (e.g._Jensen, Karch_2013) is as,_or by means of, a "wormhole"_in space-time (Einstein,_Rosen 1935). For if one means_that_kind of usual_interpretation,_any_quantum leap_in space-time corresponds_to_a certain,_"straight"_wormhole "through" space-time. From our viewpoint,_this_wormhole is equivalent to a certain curvature_in spacetime (representable by_a_space-time tensor) and thus_to a certain mass-energy (representable_by an energy-momentum tensor equated to_the former_by the_Einstein field equation) generating that space-time curvature. A certain common measure_of both straight wormhole and curvature_(and very roughly speaking,_their length)_has_to be the_same_for that_equivalence to hold. The concept, for example,_of "holographic_duality" means something similar in the_framework encountered the interpretation_of_entanglement as a wormhole. 163Why anything_rather than nothing? any source in_the framework of the Standard_model_for_entanglement is out of it,_and therefore "dark". More than that,_it is "dark"_in principle as well, for it does_not_have any carrier in definition, originating_directly_from quantum information equated to a_physical_action_by means of the Planck_constant. The equivalence of gravity and_entanglement by general relativity is the necessary condition for_that explanation of_dark energy. If this were_accepted_as_true, dark matter would correspond to the current degree of_entanglement as_an equivalent amount_of mass at rest which also falls outside of the_Standard model, unlike the Higgs mechanism 13,_and directly (non-unitarily and Lorentz non-invariantly) originates from quantum information. This_means that the process of deco