om of choice: this is meant as the secondarity of choice. Thus, the being does not need any choice, free will, subject, God, observer, etc. to appear for it appears in virtue of mathematical necessity. The creation can be considered as a mathematical truth. The world exists in virtue of mathematical necessity, e.g. as any mathematical truth such as "2+2=4". However, that fact requires the completeness of the being, which is not demonstrated yet, e.g. as follows: the operation A → {A} can be interpreted as a "primary choice", and thus a vicious circle appears. The vicious circle being equivalent to 166 Vasil Penchev a contradiction generates an empty set, to which it is a characteristic property. That empty set can underlie the successive genesis: "A → {A}" as a choice means an alternative "A → {B}" exists, e.g. {B}=∅: that choice would be necessary only if {A}={B}=∅, i.e. "nothing → ∅" is necessary. In a sense, the being is less than nothing. The being is less than nothing, rather than more than nothing. The creation does not add, but takes away. This seems to be paradoxical to common sense. It may be visualized particularly by an example. Any contradiction (such as A ∧ ¬A) as a characteristic property defines the empty set. If one removes either A or ¬A, an non-empty set can in general be defined by means of either ¬A or A correspondingly as two separated characteristic properties. Furthermore, the mathematical necessity of the being is also consistent with the conception of the Big Bang. We discuss the gradual physical creation at any time, due to the irreversibility of time as mathematically necessary. However, the mathematical necessity of the being underlies the "Big Bang" too. Time implies energy in virtue of Emmy Noether's theorems (1918). The well ordering generates the axiom of choice and thus choice itself. The Big Bang might also occur in virtue of mathematical reasons. Now, everything is ready for the Big Bang. There are time and energy, though they are not "activated" physically yet. This will be done by choice, which exists, too. The choice means zero entropy and thus infinite temperature at any finite energy, and even possibly at zero energy. The infinite temperature generates symmetry breakings (such as the Higgs mechanism), and particularly breaks the
om of choice: this is meant as the secondarity of choice. Thus, the organism does not necessitate any choice, free will, capable, God, observer, etc. to look for it appears in virtue of numerical necessity. The creation can be considered as a mathematical accuracy. The populace exists in merit of mathematical necessity, e.g. as any mathematical truth such as " 2 + 2=4 ". However, that fact command the completeness of the being, which is not demonstrated yet, e.g. as follows: the process A → { A } can be interpreted as a " basal choice ", and thus a vicious set appears. The vicious circle being equivalent to 166 Vasil Penchev a contradiction generates an empty set, to which it is a characteristic place. That empty set can underlie the successive genesis: " A → { A } " as a choice means an alternative " adenine → { barn } " exists, e.g. { B}=∅: that choice would be necessary only if { A}={B}=∅, i.e. " nothing → ∅ " is necessary. In a sense, the being is less than nothing. The organism is less than nothing, rather than more than nothing. The initiation does not add, but takes away. This seem to be paradoxical to common sense. It may be visualized peculiarly by an example. Any contradiction (such as A ∧ ¬A) as a characteristic place defines the empty set. If one removes either ampere or ¬A, an non - empty set can in general be defined by means of either ¬A or A correspondingly as two distinguish characteristic properties. Furthermore, the mathematical necessity of the being is also consistent with the conception of the Big Bang. We discourse the gradual physical creation at any time, due to the irreversibility of time as mathematically necessary. However, the mathematical necessity of the organism underlies the " Big Bang " too. Time implies energy in virtue of Emmy Noether's theorems (1918). The well ordering generates the axiom of option and thus choice itself. The Big Bang might also occur in virtue of mathematical reason. Now, everything is quick for the Big Bang. There are time and energy, though they are not " activated " physically however. This will be done by choice, which exists, too. The choice mean zero entropy and therefore infinite temperature at any finite energy, and even possibly at zero energy. The infinite temperature generates isotropy breakings (such as the Higgs mechanism), and particularly breaks the
om lf choice: this is meant xs the secondarnry of rhoice. Fhus, the being does not need any chomce, dree qill, subject, God, obserxer, etc. tl appear for ut appears in virtmz of jwtheketical necessiti. The creatimn can be conshddrzd as a mathematical truth. The world exists ij virtue of majhemauicwl nsbewsity, e.g. as any mathematical fruth slch as "2+2=4". However, tnat fact requires the comppetejess of the being, ahich is noj deiinstrated yeg, e.g. as follows: the opgration A → {A} can be interpreted xs a "'rimary choucw", ajg thus a virious bircle appears. The viwious corcle being eqmivalxnt ro 166 Vasil Penchev a cmntradiction generwtes an ekpcy set, to which it is a chardctesistkx pfoptrtb. Tgat emoty set can uhderlie the successive genesis: "A → {A}" as a choics meanf wn alternative "A → {B}" exists, e.g. {B}=∅: that chmics would be necessary onoy if {A}={B}=∅, i.e. "nothing → ∅" is necesfary. In a sense, the being is less than nothing. Tha beiig is lcss gyaj nothing, rather than more than nothing. The cwsauiok does not add, bmt takes away. This sfekf to be paraduxical to common sense. It mwy be vysualuzed partyculsrly by an example. Any conteadiction (subh aw A ∧ ¬A) as a characceristic pro'erty cefinrs the empty set. If one remkves either A or ¬A, ah non-empty set cav ik ganeral bt defined by means of eithec ¬A ox A corrdspomdinglr as two sfparabad characteristic oropetties. Xurthermorf, the mathematical necessity of the being is slvo bonsistenc with the conceptijn of the Big Yang. We biscusr the gradlal physiral creation at any time, goe to the irrxversibilyty if tume as oxthematically mecessary. However, tye mathematical negessijy of the being uubetoies the "Big Bsng" toj. Nimx impjhes energy it viftud of Eomy Noeuker'w theprems (1918). The well ordesing generates the axipm of choixe and trus choice itxelf. The Big Bang light alro ocvur in virtue of mathematical reaaons. Now, fvevything is rewdy nor jhe Big Bany. There are time and energy, though they ere not "activated" physixally yet. This will ne done by cioice, rhich exivts, too. The choice mwans zero entropy and thus infinite tejperatgre ah any finite energy, and even possibly at zero energy. The infinite temperarure gxnqrates symmstry breaniugs (such ws tie Higgs mechanism), and particularly breaks the
om of choice: this is meant as of Thus, the does not need God, etc. to appear it appears in of mathematical necessity. The creation can considered as a mathematical truth. The world exists in virtue of mathematical necessity, as any mathematical truth such as "2+2=4". However, that fact requires the completeness the which not yet, e.g. as follows: the operation A → {A} can be interpreted as a "primary choice", thus a vicious circle appears. The vicious circle equivalent to 166 Vasil a contradiction generates an empty to it is characteristic That set can underlie successive genesis: "A → {A}" as a choice means an alternative "A → {B}" exists, e.g. {B}=∅: choice would only if i.e. → is necessary. In the being is less than nothing. less than nothing, rather than more than nothing. creation does add, but takes away. This seems be paradoxical to common sense. It may be particularly by an example. Any contradiction (such as A ∧ ¬A) as a characteristic property empty set. If one either A or an set in be defined means of either ¬A or A correspondingly as two separated characteristic Furthermore, the mathematical necessity of the being is also consistent conception the Big Bang. discuss the gradual physical at time, due to the time mathematically mathematical of being underlies the "Big too. Time implies energy in of Emmy Noether's theorems the axiom of choice and thus choice itself. Big Bang might also occur in virtue mathematical reasons. Now, everything is ready for the Big Bang. There are and energy, are not "activated" physically yet. This will be by choice, which exists, The choice means zero entropy and thus infinite temperature any energy, and possibly at zero The infinite temperature symmetry breakings (such Higgs mechanism), particularly the
om of choice: this is meant as thE secondariTy of cHoiCe. THuS, the BeinG does not need anY ChoiCe, free will, subject, God, obServeR, eTC. to aPPeAr for It appeaRS iN VIrtUe Of MatHeMAtIcal nEceSsity. ThE creation cAn bE cOnsidered as a MAtHematical tRutH. The world exiSts In virtUe Of mAThemaTicAl necEssity, E.G. as any MathematiCaL Truth sUCh as "2+2=4". HowEVEr, That Fact requires the coMPlETeness of the beiNg, whicH iS NoT DEmoNstRated yet, e.g. As FolloWS: the opeRAtION a → {A} cAN be interpreteD as a "primary CHoiCe", and tHuS a vICious cIrcle ApPEarS. The vicious CircLe being eqUivaleNT to 166 VasiL penchev A contrAdiCtiOn geNErAtEs aN eMPty SEt, To wHIch It is a chaRaCtEristIc prOPERTy. ThAt eMpty Set caN underlie the sUccEssiVE geNesis: "a → {A}" as a ChoiCe Means An alteRnatiVe "a → {B}" exists, e.g. {B}=∅: that ChoiCe would be NecEsSarY oNly if {a}={b}=∅, i.e. "notHinG → ∅" is NecessaRy. In a seNSe, tHe BEINg Is less than nothing. THe BEInG is less tHan notHInG, rATher than MoRe tHan nOTHing. THe crEAtIon does nOt add, bUT tAkEs away. THiS seems To Be pAraDoxicAL to cOmmon sEnse. It maY be viSUalized particuLArly by an exampLE. ANY CoNTradIctIon (such as A ∧ ¬A) As a cHAracTeriSTiC prOPerty DefinEs THe EMpty set. If one removes EiTher A oR ¬A, an nOn-empty set can In general bE DEFined by mEans OF eITher ¬A or A corresPondiNgly as two sEParated cHaracTeristic PropertieS. fUrthermoRe, tHe mAthEmaTICaL necessity of tHE BeinG iS also coNsiStent wiTh tHe cOncEptIoN of the Big bang. We diScUsS tHe GraDual pHYsical crEaTioN aT anY time, DUe to thE irreVersIbIlITy oF time as MAtHEMatiCaLlY necEssArY. HoweVer, tHE maThematiCal necessIty OF the BeInG underlIes the "Big Bang" ToO. Time impliEs EneRgy in vIRTue of EmmY Noether's theorems (1918). The welL OrderinG geNeratEs thE axiom of cHoiCe and tHus CHoice iTself. THe Big baNg mIGHt alsO OCcUr iN vIrtue of matHEMatIcal rEaSons. now, everYthing is ready for thE big bang. There are tIme And eNERgY, thOUgH TheY aRE noT "ACtivated" physicaLly yet. This WiLL bE done by choICe, wHiCh existS, too. The ChoicE Means zeRo entropy And thus inFiNite TEMpeRature at anY finite eNergy, and eVEn posSIbLy at zEro Energy. thE inFinitE tempeRAtuRe genErates SyMmetry BreakInGs (such as The Higgs mechanism), and parTiculaRly brEakS the
om of choice: this is mean t as the s econd ari tyof  cho ice.  Thus, the bei n g do es not need any choice , fre ew ill, su bject , God,o bs e r ver ,et c.to ap pearfor  it app ears in vi rtu eof mathemati c al  necessity . T he creationcan  be co ns ide r ed as  amathe matica l  truth . The wor ld exists in virt u e  o f ma thematical necess i ty ,  e.g. as any m athema ti c al t rut h s uch as "2+ 2= 4". H o wever,t ha t f act requires thecompletenes s  of  the b ei ng, whichis no td emo nstrated ye t, e .g. as fo llows: the ope r ation A  → {A}  ca n b e in t er pr ete da s a "p rim a rychoice",  a nd  thus  a v i c i o us c irc le a ppear s. The viciou s c ircl e  be ing e quiva lent  t o 166  Vasil  Penc he v a contradicti on g eneratesanem pty  s et, t o  which  it  is  a char acteris t icpr o p e rt y. That empty setca n un derlie t he suc c es si v e genesi s:  "A  → { A } " asa ch o ic e meansan alt e rn at ive "A→{B}" e xi sts , e .g. { B }=∅:  thatchoice w ouldb e necessary on l y if {A}={B}= ∅ ,i . e. "not hin g → ∅" is n eces s ary.  Ina  s ens e , the  bein gi sl ess than nothing. T he  being  is l ess than noth ing, rathe r t han more  tha n  n o thing. The cre ation  does nota dd, buttakes  away. T his seems t o be par ado xic altoc o mm on sense. Itm a y be  v isualiz edparticu lar lybyanex ample. An y contra di ct io n(su ch as A ∧ ¬A)as  ach ara cteri s tic pr opert y de fi ne s  th e empty se t .  Ifon eremo ves  e ither  A o r  ¬A , an no n-empty s etc an i nge neral b e defined byme ans of eit he r ¬ A or A c orrespon dingly as two separated charact eri sticprop erties. F urt hermor e,t he mat hemati cal n ec ess i t y oft h ebei ng  is also c o n sis tentwi th t he conc eption of the BigB ang . We discussthe  gra d u al  ph y si c alcr e ati o n  at any time, d ue to their r ev ersibility ofti me as m athemat icall y  necess ary. Howe ver, thema them a t ica l necessit y of the  being un d erlie s  t he "B igBang"to o.Timeimplie s  en ergyin vir tu e of E mmy N oe ther's t heorems (1918). The wel l orde ringgen erates th e a x iom  of choic e an d thus cho ice  it self.  Th e  BigBang mi ght alsooccu r  in virtu e  o f m a t he matical rea s o n s.Now,eve r ything  isready for the Big Bang. There ar e ti m e  an d e n ergy ,though they ar e n ot " activate d"  physically  yet. Th is willbe don e by c hoice,w h ic h  exist s, t oo.  The choi ceme a ns zero  e nt r opy an d th us  infin ite te m pera t u re at any finite  ener g y , and eve n pos si bly atz eroenergy. Th e infinitetemper atur e gen eratessy mmetry  br ea kings (suc h  as the H iggsmechani sm ), a ndpartic ular l y  brea ks t he 
om of_choice: this_is meant as the_secondarity of_choice._Thus, the_being_does not need_any choice, free_will, subject, God, observer,_etc. to appear_for_it appears in virtue of mathematical necessity. The creation can be considered as a_mathematical_truth. The_world_exists_in virtue of mathematical necessity,_e.g. as any mathematical truth_such as_"2+2=4". However, that fact requires the completeness of_the_being, which is_not demonstrated yet, e.g. as follows: the operation A_→ {A} can be interpreted as_a "primary choice",_and_thus_a vicious circle appears._The vicious circle being equivalent to_166 Vasil Penchev a contradiction generates_an empty set, to which it is_a characteristic property. That empty set_can underlie the successive genesis:_"A →_{A}" as a choice means_an alternative "A_→ {B}"_exists, e.g. {B}=∅:_that choice would be necessary only_if {A}={B}=∅, i.e._"nothing → ∅" is necessary. In_a_sense, the being_is_less_than nothing._The being is_less_than nothing,_rather_than more than nothing. The creation_does_not add, but takes away. This seems_to be paradoxical to_common_sense. It may be_visualized particularly by an example._Any contradiction (such as A ∧_¬A) as_a characteristic_property defines the empty set. If one removes either A or_¬A, an non-empty set can in_general be defined by_means of_either_¬A or A_correspondingly_as two_separated characteristic properties. Furthermore, the mathematical necessity_of the_being is also consistent with the_conception of the Big_Bang._We discuss the gradual physical creation_at any time, due to the_irreversibility of time as mathematically_necessary._However,_the mathematical necessity of the_being underlies the "Big Bang" too._Time implies energy_in virtue of Emmy Noether's theorems (1918)._The_well ordering generates the axiom of_choice_and thus choice itself. The Big_Bang_might_also occur in virtue of_mathematical reasons. Now, everything is ready_for the Big Bang. There are time and energy,_though they are_not "activated" physically yet. This_will_be_done by choice, which exists, too. The choice means zero_entropy and_thus infinite temperature_at any finite energy, and even possibly at zero energy._The infinite temperature generates symmetry breakings (such_as the Higgs mechanism), and particularly breaks the