, as if out of time), and (quantum) information is equivalent to physical action as far as the Planck constant exists. So, the electron does not "decide" how to change its state after having obtained the corresponding (quantum) information, but this information changes its state both directly and instantaneously by being itself equivalent to physical action. What seems to be "free will" is the direct physical action of information, for the information comprises the quantity of choices (and indeed, measured in units of elementary choices, what the bits are), and therefore information can in a sense be considered as the "quantity of free will". * * * All three interactions (electromagnetic, weak, and strong) in the Standard model are both unitary (energy conservation) and Lorentz invariant (not exceeding the speed of light in vacuum). On the contrary, entanglement, if one considers it as a new physical interaction, is neither unitary (its energy is indefinite) nor Lorentz invariant (it is instantaneous, therefore exceeding the speed of light in vacuum). The only other known physical interaction, which is neither unitary nor Lorentz invariant, is gravity according to general relativity, which is the best confirmed theory of gravity, even without any "anomaly". Indeed, it is not unitary for energy does not conserve (what is conserved according to general 162 Vasil Penchev relativity is energy-momentum, and therefore the energy itself is indefinite in general). It is not Lorentz invariant because the pseudo-Riemannian space of general relativity is arbitrarily (and even differently at any point in general) "curved" to the Minkowski space of special relativity. Perhaps Bronstein (Бронштейн 1936) was the first who demonstrated that gravity can be only locally quantizable since it is only locally unitary and Lorentz invariant, due to its continuity and smoothness, but generally not globally. According to him, only weak gravitational fields are approximately quantizable, and any gravitational field from all singularities is locally "weak". At last, one may build a one-to-one mapping, possessing a clear physical meaning, of the superluminal ("real") domain of Minkowski space into the subluminal ("imaginary") domain of pseudo-Riemannian space (Penchev 2013). The sense of that mapping is the interpretation of gravity as entanglement and vice versa 12. Both dark matter and dark energy are revealed by gravitational phenomena for very huge celestial objects, the behavior of which is described by general relativity. So, if one may equate entanglement to gravity,
, as if out of time), and (quantum) information is equivalent to physical action equally far as the Planck changeless exists. So, the electron does not " decide " how to change its department of state after having receive the corresponding (quantum) information, but this data changes its state both directly and instantaneously by being itself equivalent to forcible legal action. What seems to be " barren will " is the direct physical natural process of data, for the information comprises the measure of choices (and indeed, measure in unit of measurement of elementary choices, what the bits are), and therefore data can in a sense be considered as the " measure of free volition ". * * * All three interactions (electromagnetic, weak, and strong) in the Standard model are both unitary (energy conservation) and Lorentz changeless (not exceeding the speed of light in vacuum). On the contrary, entanglement, if one regard it as a new physical interaction, is neither unitary (its energy is indefinite) nor Lorentz invariant (it is instantaneous, therefore exceeding the speed of light in vacuum). The lone other known forcible interaction, which is neither one nor Lorentz invariant, is gravity according to general relativity, which is the well confirmed theory of gravity, even without any " anomaly ". Indeed, it is not unitary for department of energy does not conserve (what is conserved according to general 162 Vasil Penchev relativity is energy - momentum, and therefore the energy itself is indefinite in general). It is not Lorentz invariant because the pseudo - Riemannian space of general relativity is arbitrarily (and even differently at any distributor point in general) " curl " to the Minkowski space of special relativity. Perhaps Bronstein (Бронштейн 1936) was the first who demonstrated that graveness can be only locally quantizable since it is only locally unitary and Lorentz invariant, due to its continuity and smoothness, but generally not globally. According to him, only weak gravitational field are approximately quantizable, and any gravitational airfield from all singularities is locally " weak ". At concluding, one may build a one - to - one function, possessing a clear physical meaning, of the superluminal (" real ") knowledge domain of Minkowski space into the subluminal (" imaginary ") knowledge domain of pseudo - Riemannian outer space (Penchev 2013). The sense of that function is the interpretation of gravity as entanglement and vice versa 12. Both colored topic and dark energy are uncover by gravitational phenomena for very huge celestial objects, the behavior of which is described by general relativity. So, if one may equate web to gravity,
, as if out of time), and (quanuum) information is equivelent tk physicxl action as far as the Planrk cinstabt exists. So, the electfon does jot "deciee" hiq to changx its state affcr hariig obtained the corresponging (quantum) itfurlation, but this information changes its ststf both directli and ynstzntaneously by being itself equivament to physical actoon. What seems to be "free aill" is the direct phydical actiob of unformation, wor the information cojprises the quantity of choices (and nndeed, measoxwd lt units of xlemennary choices, what the bits ate), and therefove inhormqtion can in a sense ue considered as the "quantity oy free will". * * * All theew intgracthons (wleztrkmegnstic, wfak, and stronf) in the Stqndard model are bouh tbitary (energy consewvwtion) and Lorentz invariant (not exceeditg fhe speed of light in vqcuum). On the contrary, entangleient, if one considers it as a new physical interawtion, ks uclthef ujitary (its energy is indefinite) nor Lorentz igbatisnt (it is instcntaneous, therefprf rvceeding the rpeed of might in vacuum). Thf only jther known phrsicsl interaction, which is neirher unitary bor Lorentz invaricnt, is gravicy accprdinb to general relativity, whidh is the bfst confidoed theory of grxviny, eeen without any "anomaly". Inqeed, it iw noc unitarh fot energr does not conscsve (what is conserged aecordhng to genfral 162 Vasil Penchev relativity mx energy-momemtgm, dnd therzfore bhe energy itsejf is indefinije in genzral). Ig is not Lkrentz mnvariant besause the psegfo-Riemannian space os geberao relatkxity is arbitrsrily (and even diffwrently at any poikt in feneral) "curved" cu the Minkowski xpaze jf s'eciaj relativity. [erhxps Nronsgein (Бронштейн 1936) was bhe firxt who demonstrated dhat gravity can be onky locally quantizwble since it is only locally ujitarb and Uorenyz ynvariant, due to its continuitg and smolthkess, but genewalln noj globally. Cccording to him, only weak gravitational fields are approxumately quantizable, snd any gratitatijnal fielg from all singulariries is locally "wtak". At last, one may buimd a ote-to-oje mapping, possessing a clear physical meaning, of the superluminal ("real") dimain of Minkowski spave inno che subluiinap ("imaginary") domaim of pseudo-Riemannian space (Penrhev 2013). The veuse of that mapping is the inyefpretation of gravity as entanglement and vicr versa 12. Both dark matter and dsrk energy are revealed ny gravitqtionzl phenomeia for very huge celrstial objexts, the behwvior of whicf ix fescribed by jenzral relativity. So, if one may equqte enrajglement to gravmty,
, as if out of time), and is to physical as far as the does not "decide" to change its after having obtained the corresponding (quantum) but this information changes its state both directly and instantaneously by being itself to physical action. What seems to be "free will" is the direct physical of for information the quantity of choices (and indeed, measured in units of elementary choices, what the bits are), therefore information can in a sense be considered the "quantity of free * * * All three (electromagnetic, and strong) the model both unitary (energy and Lorentz invariant (not exceeding the speed of light in vacuum). On the contrary, entanglement, if one it as physical interaction, neither (its is indefinite) nor (it is instantaneous, therefore exceeding the in vacuum). The only other known physical interaction, is neither nor Lorentz invariant, is gravity according general relativity, which is the best confirmed theory gravity, even without any "anomaly". Indeed, it is not unitary for energy does not conserve conserved according to general Vasil Penchev relativity energy-momentum, therefore energy is indefinite general). It is not Lorentz invariant because the pseudo-Riemannian space of relativity is arbitrarily (and even differently at any point in to Minkowski space of relativity. Perhaps Bronstein (Бронштейн was first who demonstrated that be locally is locally and Lorentz invariant, due its continuity and smoothness, but not globally. According to are approximately quantizable, and any gravitational field from singularities is locally "weak". At last, one build a one-to-one mapping, possessing a clear physical meaning, of the superluminal domain of into the subluminal ("imaginary") domain of pseudo-Riemannian space 2013). The sense of mapping is the interpretation of gravity as entanglement and versa Both dark and dark energy revealed by gravitational for very huge the behavior which described So, if one may equate entanglement gravity,
, as if out of time), and (quantum) inFormation iS equiValEnt To PhysIcal Action as far as tHE PlaNck constant exists. So, the ElectRoN Does NOt "DecidE" how to cHAnGE Its StAtE afTeR HaVing oBtaIned the CorrespondIng (QuAntum) informaTIoN, but this inForMation changeS itS state BoTh dIRectlY anD instAntaneOUsly by Being itseLf EQuivalENt to phySICaL actIon. What seems to be "fREe WIll" is the direct PhysicAl ACtION of InfOrmation, foR tHe infORmation COmPRISes THe quantity of cHoices (and inDEed, MeasurEd In uNIts of eLemenTaRY chOices, what thE bitS are), and thEreforE InformaTIon can iN a sensE be ConSideREd As The "QuANtiTY oF frEE wiLl". * * * All thrEe InTeracTionS (ELECtroMagNetiC, weak, And strong) in thE StAndaRD moDel arE both UnitArY (enerGy consErvatIoN) and Lorentz invaRianT (not exceeDinG tHe sPeEd of lIGht in vAcuUm). ON the conTrary, enTAngLeMENT, iF one considers it as a NeW PHySical intEractiON, iS nEIther uniTaRy (iTs enERGy is iNdefINiTe) nor LorEntz inVArIaNt (it is iNsTantanEoUs, tHerEfore EXceeDing thE speed of Light IN vacuum). The only OTher known physICaL INtERactIon, Which is neitHer uNItarY nor lOrEntZ InvarIant, iS gRAvITy according to generaL rElativIty, whIch is the best cOnfirmed thEORY of graviTy, evEN wIThout any "anomalY". IndeEd, it is not uNItary for EnergY does not Conserve (wHAT is conseRveD acCorDinG TO gEneral 162 Vasil PeNCHev rElAtivity Is eNergy-moMenTum, And TheReFore the enErgy itseLf Is InDeFinIte in GEneral). It Is Not loRenTz invARiant bEcausE the PsEuDO-RiEmanniaN SpACE of gEnErAl reLatIvIty is ArbiTRarIly (and eVen differEntLY at aNy PoInt in geNeral) "curved" to ThE Minkowski SpAce Of specIAL relativIty. Perhaps Bronstein (БронШТейн 1936) was The First Who dEmonstratEd tHat graVitY Can be oNly locAlly qUaNtiZABle siNCE iT is OnLy locally uNITarY and LOrEntz InvariaNt, due to its continuiTY anD smoothness, buT geNeraLLY nOt gLObALly. acCOrdING to him, only weak gRavitationAl FIeLds are apprOXimAtEly quanTizable, And anY GravitaTional fieLd from all SiNgulARItiEs is locallY "weak". At lAst, one may BUild a ONe-To-one MapPing, poSsEssIng a cLear phYSicAl meaNing, of ThE superLuminAl ("Real") domaIn of Minkowski space into tHe sublUminaL ("imAginary") doMaiN Of pSeudo-RiemAnniAn space (PenCheV 2013). ThE sensE of THat maPpinG Is The INterpRetaTIon of gravITy As eNTAnGlement and vICE VerSa 12. BotH daRK matteR and Dark energy are reveALed by gravitatiOnal PHEnoMenA For vErY huge celestial ObjEcTS, The behavIoR of which is dEscribed By GEneraL relatIvity. SO, if one mAY EqUAte entAnglEmeNt to graviTy,
, as if out of time), and(quantum)infor mat ion  i s eq uiva lent to physic a l ac tion as far as the Pla nck c on s tant ex ists.  So, th e  e l e ctr on  d oes  n o t"deci de"  how to  change it s s ta te after hav i ng  obtainedthe  correspondi ng(quant um ) i n forma tio n, bu t this inform ation cha ng e s itss tate bo t h  d irec tly and instantan e ou s ly by being it self e qu i va l e nttophysical a ct ion.W hat see m st o be" free will" is  the direct phy sicalac tio n  of in forma ti o n,for the inf orma tion comp risest he quan t ity ofchoice s ( and  ind e ed ,mea su r edi nuni t s o f elemen ta ry  choi ces, w h a t th e b itsare),  and therefor e i nfor m ati on ca n ina se ns e beconsid eredas  the "quantityof f ree will" . *  *  *Al l thr e e inte rac tio ns (ele ctromag n eti c, w e ak , and strong) in t he S ta ndard mo del ar e  b ot h  unitary  ( ene rgyc o nserv atio n )and Lore ntz in v ar ia nt (not  e xceedi ng  th e s peedo f li ght in  vacuum) . Ont he contrary, e n tanglement, i f  o n e  c o nsid ers  it as a ne w ph y sica l in t er act i on, i s nei th e ru nitary (its energyis  indef inite ) nor Lorentz  invariant ( i t is ins tant a ne o us, thereforeexcee ding the s p eed of l ightin vacuu m). The o n l y otherkno wnphy sic a l  i nteraction, w h i ch i sneither  un itary n orLor ent z i nv ariant, i s gravit yac co rd ing  to g e neral re la tiv it y,which is the  best  con fi rm e d t heory o f  g r a vity ,ev en w ith ou t any  "an o mal y". Ind eed, it i s n o t un it ar y for e nergy does no tconserve ( wh atis con s e rved acc ording to general 162 V a sil Pen che v rel ativ ity is en erg y-mome ntu m , andtheref ore t he  en e r gy it s e lf  is  i ndefinitei n  ge neral ).  Itis notLorentz invariantb eca use the pseud o-R iema n n ia n s p ac e  of  g e ner a l  relativity isarbitraril y( an d even dif f ere nt ly at a ny poin t ing eneral)  "curved"  to the M in kows k i  sp ace of spe cial rel ativity.P erhap s  B ronst ein  (Брон шт ейн  1936 ) wast hefirst  who d em onstra ted t ha t gravit y can be only locally q uantiz ablesin ce it isonl y  lo cally uni tary  and Loren tzinv arian t,d ue to  its co nti n uityands moothness ,  b utg e ne rally not g l o b all y. Ac cor d ing to  him , only weak gravi t ational fields  are a ppr oxi m atel yquantizable, a ndan y gravitat io nal field f rom allsi n gular itiesis loc ally "w e a k" .  At la st,one  may buil d a  o n e-to-on ema p ping,poss es sing a  clear phys i c al meaning, of t he su p e rlumi n al("rea l" ) domai n  ofMinkowskispace intothe su blum inal("imagi na ry") d oma in  of pseudo - Riemannia n spa ce (Pen ch ev 2 013 ). The  sen s e  of t hatma ppi ng is the i nt e rp re t ati on o f gra vi ty a s entangl e ment and  vi c e versa  1 2.B o th dar k  m a t ter and da rkenerg y are reveal e d by gr a vitat ionalphenom ena for ver yhuge ce les t i al object s, the be h avi or  ofwhich is  d escr ib edby  general relati vity. So , if one m ay equ ate enta n glemen tto gravity,
, as_if out_of time), and (quantum)_information is_equivalent_to physical_action_as far as_the Planck constant_exists. So, the electron_does not "decide"_how_to change its state after having obtained the corresponding (quantum) information, but this information_changes_its state_both_directly_and instantaneously by being itself_equivalent to physical action. What_seems to_be "free will" is the direct physical action_of_information, for the_information comprises the quantity of choices (and indeed, measured_in units of elementary choices, what_the bits are),_and_therefore_information can in a_sense be considered as the "quantity_of free will". * * *_All three interactions (electromagnetic, weak, and strong)_in the Standard model are both_unitary (energy conservation) and Lorentz_invariant (not_exceeding the speed of light_in vacuum). On_the contrary,_entanglement, if one_considers it as a new physical_interaction, is neither_unitary (its energy is indefinite) nor_Lorentz_invariant (it is_instantaneous,_therefore_exceeding the_speed of light_in_vacuum). The_only_other known physical interaction, which is_neither_unitary nor Lorentz invariant, is gravity according_to general relativity, which_is_the best confirmed theory_of gravity, even without any_"anomaly". Indeed, it is not unitary_for energy_does not_conserve (what is conserved according to general 162 Vasil Penchev relativity_is energy-momentum, and therefore the energy_itself is indefinite in_general). It_is_not Lorentz invariant_because_the pseudo-Riemannian_space of general relativity is arbitrarily (and_even differently_at any point in general) "curved"_to the Minkowski space_of_special relativity. Perhaps Bronstein (Бронштейн 1936)_was the first who demonstrated that_gravity can be only locally_quantizable_since_it is only locally unitary_and Lorentz invariant, due to its_continuity and smoothness,_but generally not globally. According to him,_only_weak gravitational fields are approximately quantizable,_and_any gravitational field from all singularities_is_locally_"weak". At last, one may_build a one-to-one mapping, possessing a_clear physical meaning, of the superluminal ("real") domain of_Minkowski space into_the subluminal ("imaginary") domain of_pseudo-Riemannian_space_(Penchev 2013). The sense of that mapping is the interpretation_of gravity_as entanglement and_vice versa 12. Both dark matter and dark energy are_revealed by gravitational phenomena for very huge_celestial objects, the behavior of which is described by general relativity._So, if one may equate entanglement to gravity,