 time might change. For this, a special theory of mutual transformation between them is needed, as well as many observations and experiments. What one might say unambiguously is that dark matter decreases by transforming into dark energy, which increases. However, the amount of new dark matter for new entanglement due to the "visible" interactions remains absolutely unknown, and therefore the same goes for the general balance and change. Perhaps color confinement will take an essential place in that general balance 15. The creation due to mathematical necessity One can approach the mathematical necessity of creation as follows: the creation is necessary in a rigorous sense after one has mathematically represented the physical creation by "taking away". The operation A → {A} (i.e. the generation of a set from a class) means "taking away", and it is always possible, including the application to ∅ (the empty set) or to another set: {A} →{{A}}. However, choice from the empty set is not allowed. Thus, choice turns out to be secondary to the natural numbers. They are implied directly and thus, necessarily, from the nothing for choice is implied only indirectly by means of them and by the axiom of choice, which does not include the choice of the empty set. That secondarity of choice is just that which implies the necessity of creation, for the creation comes "before" the choice appears. The choice appears together with time, however creation is outside of time, for the creation creates the time along with all the rest. The creation underlain by set theory seems to be leap-like, generating all natural numbers as the result of that necessary leap from nothing into being. On the contrary, physics describes the same equivalently, but alternatively: as a continuous process of the being to appear, which is observed as the expansion of their mutual transformation is due. 15 Confinement and entanglement seem to be similar to each other in a sense. Unlike the usual physical interactions between objects separate in both Minkowski and Hilbert space, the objects interacting either by entanglement or confinement are absolutely separate only in the one of them correspondingly. Entanglement is possible both by violating Bell's equation (over the light barrier) or not (below it). The criterion for the partial inseparability of quarks in Minkowski space is their fractional electric charge. At last, one may admit that a phenomenon (e.g. Lewkowycz, Maldacena 2014) as the entanglement of quarks (color entanglement) might exist to complement that scheme of partial separability and in
time might change. For this, a special theory of common transformation between them is need, as well as many observations and experiments. What one might allege unambiguously is that dark topic decreases by transforming into dark department of energy, which increase. However, the amount of modern dark matter for raw web due to the " visible " interactions remains absolutely strange, and therefore the same go for the general balance and change. possibly color confinement will necessitate an substantive place in that cosmopolitan balance 15. The creation due to mathematical necessity One can approach the numerical necessity of creation as follows: the creation is necessary in a rigorous sense after one has mathematically represented the physical creation by " taking away ". The operation A → { A } (i.e. the generation of a set from a class) means " taking aside ", and it is always possible, admit the lotion to ∅ (the empty hardening) or to another set: { A } →{{A } }. However, choice from the empty set is not allowed. Thus, choice turns out to be junior-grade to the natural numbers. They are implied directly and thus, necessarily, from the nothing for choice is implied only indirectly by means of them and by the axiom of choice, which does not admit the choice of the empty stage set. That secondarity of choice is just that which implies the necessity of creation, for the creation issue forth " before " the choice appears. The choice appear together with time, however creation is outside of time, for the universe creates the fourth dimension along with all the rest. The creation underlain by fit theory look to be leap - alike, generating all lifelike numbers as the result of that necessary leap from nothing into being. On the reverse, physics describes the same equivalently, but alternatively: as a continuous process of the being to appear, which is observed as the expansion of their mutual transformation is due. 15 Confinement and entanglement seem to be similar to each early in a sense. Unlike the usual forcible interactions between objects separate in both Minkowski and Hilbert distance, the objects interacting either by entanglement or confinement are absolutely separate only in the one of them correspondingly. Entanglement is possible both by violating Bell's equation (over the light barrier) or not (below it). The standard for the partial inseparability of quarks in Minkowski outer space is their fractional electric charge. At last, one may admit that a phenomenon (e.g. Lewkowycz, Maldacena 2014) as the entanglement of quarks (color web) might exist to complement that scheme of partial separability and in
 tile might change. For this, a special theoty of muvual trznsformagion between them is needed, es wwll aw many observations ana experimvnts. What one night say nhambiguously jd thct dark matter dgcreases by dransforming ittu bark energy, which increases. However, ehe amoinh of new dark iatttr sor hvw entanglement due to the "visigle" inttractions remains sbsolutely unknown, and thegefoge the same goes flr the genetzl fqlance and cfange. Perhaps color cohfinement will take an essentiau plaee in that teberwn balance 15. Vhe crvation due to mathemadical nrcessity One csn eppriach the mathematical necessity of creajion as fonlkws: the creation us necevsarf in q rkgodons aense wftxr one has jathematicaoly represented the prjxical creatikn by "eahing away". The operation A → {A} (i.e. the gentratikn of a set from a clasw) means "taking away", ajd it is wlways possible, including the application to ∅ (the emptb ret) ov to qnlther set: {A} →{{A}}. However, choice from the empty sqf os not allowed. Tmus, choice turns oit tp be secondary to thz nztural numbers. Thej are iipliee directlr anc thus, necessarily, from the nothing for xhoice is implied lnly indireetly bi meanx of them and by the axnom of choice, whifh does nkg include the chuicv of the empuh set. That secondwrity of rhoicz is jusg thst whish implies the kacessity of creatiln, fot the wreation clmes "before" the choice appears. Vie choice appgarv tmgether cith tlme, however crewtion is outsibe of tiie, fof the creanion creaves the time along with anp the rest. Tie creatijn ubderoain by ret theory seeks to be leap-like, gwnerating all natuval nomgers as the resbuu if that necesssry lewp fcom njdhing into baing. On yhe cuntrary, phywkcs cescribes the same exuivzlently, but alternstlvely: as q contintous process pf the being to apkear, wiich ir obsrrvgd as the expansion of their mufual trandfovmation is duq. 15 Cinfinement aud entanglement seem to be similar to earh other in a sense. Unluke the usual physieak interactipns bqtween obbects separate in borh Minkowski and Milbert space, the objedts inderaching either by entanglement or confinement are absolutely separate only ib the one of them dorrrspongiuglv. Entandlemxnv is possible botn by violating Bell's equation (oter the lichc barrier) or not (below it). The cfiterion for jhe partial inseparability of quarls in Minkowski space is their gractional electric charne. At lasr, one may admit that a phenomenon (e.g. Leckowycz, Maldaxena 2014) as the entavglrmcnt of quagks (rolkr entanglement) might exist to cimplemwnh that scheme of partial seiavabilijy and ig
time might change. For this, a special mutual between them needed, as well What might say unambiguously that dark matter by transforming into dark energy, which However, the amount of new dark matter for new entanglement due to the interactions remains absolutely unknown, and therefore the same goes for the general balance change. color will an essential place in that general balance 15. The creation due to mathematical necessity One can the mathematical necessity of creation as follows: the is necessary in a sense after one has mathematically the creation by away". operation → {A} (i.e. generation of a set from a class) means "taking away", and it is always possible, including the to ∅ set) or another {A} However, choice from set is not allowed. Thus, choice be secondary to the natural numbers. They are directly and necessarily, from the nothing for choice implied only indirectly by means of them and the axiom of choice, which does not include the choice of the empty set. That choice is just that implies the necessity creation, the comes the choice The choice appears together with time, however creation is outside of for the creation creates the time along with all the creation by set theory to be leap-like, generating natural as the result of leap nothing the physics the same equivalently, but as a continuous process of being to appear, which of their mutual transformation is due. 15 Confinement entanglement seem to be similar to each in a sense. Unlike the usual physical interactions between objects separate in Minkowski and the objects interacting either by entanglement or confinement absolutely separate only in one of them correspondingly. Entanglement is possible both by Bell's (over the barrier) or not it). The criterion the partial inseparability in Minkowski is fractional last, one may admit that a (e.g. Maldacena 2014) as the entanglement quarks might exist to complement that scheme of partial separability and in
 time might change. For this, a spEcial theorY of muTuaL trAnSforMatiOn between them iS NeedEd, as well as many observatIons aNd EXperIMeNts. WhAt one miGHt SAY unAmBiGuoUsLY iS that DarK matter Decreases bY trAnSforming into DArK energy, whiCh iNcreases. HoweVer, The amoUnT of NEw darK maTter fOr new eNTangleMent due to ThE "VisiblE" InteracTIOnS remAins absolutely unkNOwN, And therefore thE same gOeS FoR THe gEneRal balance AnD chanGE. PerhapS CoLOR ConFInement will taKe an essentiAL plAce in tHaT geNEral baLance 15. thE CreAtion due to mAtheMatical neCessitY one can aPProach tHe mathEmaTicAl neCEsSiTy oF cREatIOn As fOLloWs: the creAtIoN is neCessARY IN a riGorOus sEnse aFter one has matHemAticALly RepreSenteD the PhYsicaL creatIon by "TaKing away". The operAtioN A → {A} (i.e. the gEneRaTioN oF a set FRom a clAss) MeaNs "takinG away", anD It iS aLWAYs Possible, including tHe APPlIcation tO ∅ (the emPTy SeT) Or to anotHeR seT: {A} →{{A}}. HOWEver, cHoicE FrOm the empTy set iS NoT aLlowed. THuS, choicE tUrnS ouT to be SEconDary to The naturAl numBErs. They are implIEd directly and THuS, NEcESsarIly, From the nothIng fOR choIce iS ImPliED only IndirEcTLy BY means of them and by thE aXiom of ChoicE, which does not Include the CHOIce of the EmptY SeT. that secondaritY of chOice is just THat which ImpliEs the necEssity of cREAtion, for The CreAtiOn cOMEs "Before" the choiCE AppeArS. The choIce Appears TogEthEr wIth TiMe, however Creation Is OuTsIdE of Time, fOR the creaTiOn cReAteS the tIMe alonG with All tHe ReST. ThE creatiON uNDErlaIn By Set tHeoRy Seems To be LEap-Like, genErating alL naTUral NuMbErs as thE result of that NeCessary leaP fRom NothinG INto being. on the contrary, physics desCRibes thE saMe equIvalEntly, but aLteRnativEly: AS a contInuous ProceSs Of tHE Being TO ApPeaR, wHich is obseRVEd aS the eXpAnsiOn of theIr mutual transformaTIon Is due. 15 ConfinemEnt And eNTAnGleMEnT SeeM tO Be sIMIlar to each other In a sense. UnLiKE tHe usual phySIcaL iNteractIons betWeen oBJects seParate in bOth MinkowSkI and hILbeRt space, the Objects iNteractinG EitheR By EntanGleMent or CoNfiNemenT are abSOluTely sEparatE oNly in tHe one Of Them corrEspondingly. Entanglement Is possIble bOth By violatiNg BELl's Equation (oVer tHe light barRieR) or Not (beLow IT). The cRiteRIoN foR The paRtiaL InseparabILiTy oF QUaRks in MinkowSKI SpaCe is tHeiR FractiOnal Electric charge. At lASt, one may admit tHat a PHEnoMenON (e.g. LEwKowycz, MaldacenA 2014) as ThE ENtanglemEnT of quarks (coLor entanGlEMent) mIght exIst to cOmplemeNT ThAT schemE of pArtIal separaBilItY And in
 time might change. For th is, a spec ial t heo ryof  mut ualtransformation betw een them is needed, as  well  a s  man y  o bserv ationsa nd e xpe ri me nts .W ha t one  mi ght say  unambiguo usl yis that dark ma tter decre ase s by transfo rmi ng int odar k  ener gy,  whic h incr e ases.However,th e  amoun t  of new d ar k ma tter for new enta n gl e ment due to th e "vis ib l e" i nte rac tions rema in s abs o lutelyu nk n o w n,a nd thereforethe same go e s f or the  g ene r al bal ancean d  ch ange. Perha ps c olor conf inemen t  will t a ke an e ssenti alpla ce i n  t ha t g en e ral ba lan c e 1 5. The c re at ion d ue t o m a them ati calneces sity One canapp roac h  th e mat hemat ical  n ecess ity of  crea ti on as follows:thecreationisne ces sa ry in a rigo rou s s ense af ter one has  m a t h em atically represent ed t he  physica l crea t io nb y "takin gawa y".T h e ope rati o nA → {A}(i.e.t he  g enerati on  of ase t f rom  a cl a ss)means"takingaway" ,  and it is alw a ys possible,i nc l u di n g th e a pplicationto ∅ (the  emp t yset )  or t o ano th e rs et: {A} →{{A}}. How ev er, ch oicefrom the empt y set is n o t allowed.  Thu s ,c hoice turns ou t tobe seconda r y to the  natu ral numb ers. They a re impli eddir ect lya n dthus, necessa r i ly,fr om thenot hing fo r c hoi ceisim plied onl y indire ct ly  b ymea ns of them and  b y t he  ax iom o f  choic e, wh ichdo es not  includ e  t h e  cho ic eof t heem pty s et.T hat  second arity ofcho i ce i sju st that  which implie sthe necess it y o f crea t i on, forthe creation comes "bef o re" the  ch oiceappe ars. Thecho ice ap pea r s toge ther w ith t im e,h o wever c re ati on  is outsid e oftime,  f or t he crea tion creates the t i mealong with al l t he r e s t.  Th e  c r eat io n  un d e rlain by set th eory seems  t o  b e leap-lik e , g en erating  all na tural numbers  as the r esult ofth at n e c ess ary leap f rom noth ing intob eing. On  thecon trary,  p hys ics d escrib e s t he sa me equ iv alentl y, bu talternat ively: as a continuousproces s ofthe  being to  ap p ear , which i s ob served asthe  ex pansi ono f the ir m u tu alt ransf orma t ion is du e .15C o nf inement and e n tan gleme nts eem to  besimilar to each o t her in a sense . Un l i kethe usua lphysical inter act io n s  between  o bjects sepa rate inbo t h Min kowski  and H ilberts p ac e , theobje cts  interact ing  e i ther by  e nt a ngleme nt o rconfin ementa re a b s olutely separate  only i n the one  of t he m corre s pond ingly. Ent anglement i s poss ible  both  by vio la ting B ell 's  equation( over thelight  barrie r)  ornot  (belo w it ) .  Thecrit er ion  for thep a rt i al  i n sep arab ility  o f qu arks in M i nkowskispa c e is th ei r f r a ctiona l  e l e ctric char ge.  At l a s t, one may admi t  t h at aphenom enon ( e.g. Le w kow yc z, Mald ace n a  2014) as  the enta n gle me nt o f quarks  ( colo rent an glement) mightexist to  complem e n t that  sc h emeo f part ia l separabili ty an di n
 time_might change._For this, a special_theory of_mutual_transformation between_them_is needed, as_well as many_observations and experiments. What_one might say_unambiguously_is that dark matter decreases by transforming into dark energy, which increases. However, the_amount_of new_dark_matter_for new entanglement due to_the "visible" interactions remains absolutely_unknown, and_therefore the same goes for the general balance_and_change. Perhaps color_confinement will take an essential place in that general_balance 15. The creation due to_mathematical necessity One_can_approach_the mathematical necessity of_creation as follows: the creation is_necessary in a rigorous sense after_one has mathematically represented the physical creation_by "taking away". The operation A_→ {A} (i.e. the generation_of a_set from a class) means_"taking away", and_it is_always possible, including_the application to ∅ (the empty_set) or to_another set: {A} →{{A}}. However, choice_from_the empty set_is_not_allowed. Thus,_choice turns out_to_be secondary_to_the natural numbers. They are implied_directly_and thus, necessarily, from the nothing for_choice is implied only_indirectly_by means of them_and by the axiom of_choice, which does not include the_choice of_the empty_set. That secondarity of choice is just that which implies the_necessity of creation, for the creation_comes "before" the choice_appears. The_choice_appears together with_time,_however creation_is outside of time, for the creation_creates the_time along with all the rest._The creation underlain by_set_theory seems to be leap-like, generating_all natural numbers as the result_of that necessary leap from_nothing_into_being. On the contrary, physics_describes the same equivalently, but alternatively:_as a continuous_process of the being to appear, which_is_observed as the expansion of their_mutual_transformation is due. 15 Confinement and_entanglement_seem_to be similar to each_other in a sense. Unlike the_usual physical interactions between objects separate in both Minkowski_and Hilbert space,_the objects interacting either by_entanglement_or_confinement are absolutely separate only in the one of them_correspondingly. Entanglement_is possible both_by violating Bell's equation (over the light barrier) or not_(below it). The criterion for the partial_inseparability of quarks in Minkowski space is their fractional electric charge._At last, one may admit that a phenomenon_(e.g. Lewkowycz, Maldacena 2014) as the entanglement_of quarks (color entanglement)_might_exist to complement that scheme of partial_separability_and_in