, Michael Bergmann, Stewart Cohen, Keith DeRose, Tamar Gendler, Stephen Grimm, Daniel Nolan, Philip Quinn, Wayne Riggs, Ted Sider, Eleonore Stump, Ernest Sosa, Fritz Warfield, and Linda Zagzebski for their helpful comments in discussion and on earlier versions of the paper. Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes Author(s): Charlie Kurth Source: Ethics, Vol. 124, No. 2 (January 2014), pp. 370-383 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673435. Accessed: 13/12/2013 11:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.252.58.243 on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:00:23 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes*Charlie Kurth Allan Gibbard maintains that his plan-based expressivism allows for a particular type of innocent mistake: I can agree that your plan to F makes sense ðsay, because it was based on advice from someone you trustÞ, while nonetheless insisting that it is incorrect ðe.g., because you chose a bad advisorÞ. However, Steve Daskal has recently argued that there are significant limitations in Gibbard's account of how we can be mistaken about the normative judgment we make. This essay refines Gibbard's account in order to show-contra Daskal-that expressivists can deliver a surprisingly robust form of normativity objectivity. I can judge your plan to vacation at the shore to be innocently mistaken for a variety of reasons. First, I can judge it to be innocently mistaken on epist
, Michael Bergmann, Stewart Cohen, Keith DeRose, Tamar Gendler, Stephen Grimm, Daniel Nolan, Philip Quinn, Wayne Riggs, Ted Sider, Eleonore Stump, Ernest Sosa, Fritz Warfield, and Linda Zagzebski for their helpful comments in discussion and on earlier versions of the paper. Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes Author(s ): Charlie Kurth generator: Ethics, Vol. 124, nobelium. 2 (January 2014), pp. 370 - 383 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673435. access: 13/12/2013 11:00 Your consumption of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR is a not - for - net income service that helps scholars, research worker, and student discover, manipulation, and build upon a wide image of contentedness in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productiveness and facilitate new forms of eruditeness. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend entree to Ethics. http://www.jstor.org This content download from 128.252.58.243 on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:00:23 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes*Charlie Kurth Allan Gibbard conserve that his plan - based expressivism allows for a particular type of impeccant mistake: I can agree that your plan to F makes sense ðsay, because it was based on advice from someone you trustÞ, while nonetheless insisting that it is incorrect ðe.g. , because you chose a regretful advisorÞ. However, Steve Daskal has recently argue that there are meaning limit in Gibbard's explanation of how we can be mistaken about the normative judgment we make. This essay refines Gibbard's account in order to usher - contra Daskal - that expressivists can deliver a surprisingly robust form of normativity objectivity. I can judge your plan to vacation at the shore to be innocently false for a variety of reasons. First, I can judge it to be innocently misguided on epist
, Mifhael Bergmann, Stewart Cuhen, Keith DeRose, Tamac Gendlsr, Stephdn Grimm, Daniel Nolan, Philip Qyinn, Qayne Riggs, Ted Sider, Dleonore Dtump, Erbest Wosa, Fritz Warfield, and Mlnda Vajzebski for thelr helpful womments in divcjsdion and on earlier versions of the paper. Rxoressivism and Innpsent Mistakes Author(s): Charlie Kurth Sohrce: Etiics, Vol. 124, No. 2 (Jsnuary 2014), pp. 370-383 Published by: Tje Ujiversity of Chicaho Press Stqble YRL: http://www.jrtor.org/stable/10.1086/673435. Accessed: 13/12/2013 11:00 Your use of the JSTOR archivd indncates your axceojance of the Termf & Conditions of Use, availanle at. http://www.mstor.mrg/page/info/about/policies/verms.jsp. JSTOR is a got-for-proxic service that helps wcyolarv, revearzyerr, ahd sfudentd dmscover, use, and build ypon a wide range og sintent in a tdusted dygital archive. We use information technmlofy and tools to increasw productivity and fafilitate gew forms of scholarship. For more information abogt JSVOF, poewrw fontact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chiszgp Iress is collaborcting with JSTOR tl cygitize, presetve and exfend access to Ethlcs. httk://www.jsror.org Thys cpntent downloaded from 128.252.58.243 on Dri, 13 Dec 2013 11:00:23 AI All use subject tl JSTOR Teros amd Comditions Expressivism aud Innkcent Mistanes*Charlis Kurth Allan Gibcarc kaintains that his plan-basqd expreswivixm allods fpr a pwrticular hype of innocent mistake: I cau agrae that yokr plan to F makes sense ðsay, bereuse it was bssad mn advicz from someone you erustÞ, while nouethelesf insksting than it is iicorrect ðe.g., fecause you cvlse a bad adtisorÞ. Howqver, Stece Daskxu has recently argued tkct there qre significant likitxfions in Gibbarb'r account of how we cag he myvtaken about the nofkativd judgmtut ce makr. This essay refines Gibgard's account in otdcr to shoq-contra Qaskal-that exlressivists can depiver a rurprosiggly robust form of normativitg objectigitn. I can judge youv plwn to vacacion at the shore to be innocently mistajen for a variety if reasons. First, I eak judge it tp be ynnocentlf mistaken on epist
, Michael Bergmann, Stewart Cohen, Keith DeRose, Stephen Daniel Nolan, Quinn, Wayne Riggs, Sosa, Warfield, and Linda for their helpful in discussion and on earlier versions the paper. Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes Author(s): Charlie Kurth Source: Ethics, Vol. 124, 2 (January 2014), pp. 370-383 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673435. 13/12/2013 Your of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, and students discover, use, build upon a wide range content a trusted archive. use technology and tools increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The of Chicago collaborating with to preserve extend access to This content downloaded from 128.252.58.243 on 2013 11:00:23 AM All use subject to JSTOR and Conditions and Innocent Mistakes*Charlie Kurth Allan Gibbard that his plan-based expressivism allows for a particular of innocent mistake: I can agree that your plan to F makes sense ðsay, because based on advice from you trustÞ, while insisting it incorrect because you a bad advisorÞ. However, Steve Daskal has recently argued that there significant limitations in Gibbard's account of how we can be the judgment we make. essay refines Gibbard's account order show-contra Daskal-that expressivists can surprisingly form I judge plan to vacation at shore to be innocently mistaken a variety of reasons. to be innocently mistaken on epist
, Michael Bergmann, Stewart CohEn, Keith DeROse, TaMar genDlEr, StEpheN Grimm, Daniel NoLAn, PhIlip Quinn, Wayne Riggs, Ted sider, elEOnorE stUmp, ErNest SosA, frITZ WaRfIeLd, aNd lInDa ZagZebSki for tHeir helpfuL coMmEnts in discusSIoN and on earlIer Versions of thE paPer. ExpReSsiVIsm anD InNocenT MistaKEs AuthOr(s): CharliE KURth SouRCe: EthicS, vOl. 124, no. 2 (JaNuary 2014), pp. 370-383 Published bY: thE university of ChIcago PReSS STABle uRL: Http://www.jstOr.Org/stABle/10.1086/673435. AcceSSeD: 13/12/2013 11:00 yOUr uSE of the JSTOR arChive indicaTEs yOur accEpTanCE of the terms & coNDitIons of Use, avAilaBle at. http://Www.jstOR.org/pagE/Info/aboUt/poliCieS/teRms.jSP. JsToR iS a NOt-fOR-pRofIT seRvice thaT hElPs schOlarS, RESEarcHerS, and StudeNts discover, usE, anD buiLD upOn a wiDe ranGe of CoNtent In a truSted dIgItal archive. We usE infOrmation tEchNoLogY aNd tooLS to incReaSe pRoductiVity and FAciLiTATE nEw forms of scholarshIp. fOR mOre inforMation ABoUt jsTOR, pleaSe ConTact SUPport@JstoR.OrG.. The UnivErsity OF CHiCago PreSs Is collAbOraTinG with jsTOR To digiTize, presErve aND extend access tO ethics. http://www.JStOR.OrG this ConTent downloaDed fROm 128.252.58.243 on fri, 13 DEC 2013 11:00:23 Am AlL Use suBject To jsTor Terms and Conditions exPressiVism aNd Innocent MisTakes*CharlIE kUrth AllaN GibBArD Maintains that hIs plaN-based exprESsivism aLlows For a partIcular typE OF innocenT miStaKe: I Can AGReE that your plan TO f makEs Sense ðsAy, bEcause iT waS baSed On aDvIce from soMeone you TrUsTÞ, WhIle NonetHEless insIsTinG tHat It is iNCorrecT ðe.g., bEcauSe YoU ChoSe a bad aDViSORÞ. HoWeVeR, SteVe DAsKal haS recENtlY argued That there Are SIgniFiCaNt limitAtions in GibbaRd'S account of HoW we Can be mISTaken aboUt the normative judgment wE Make. ThiS esSay reFineS Gibbard's AccOunt in OrdER to shoW-contrA DaskAl-ThaT EXpresSIViSts CaN deliver a sURPriSinglY rObusT form of Normativity objectiVIty. i can judge your PlaN to vACAtIon AT tHE shOrE To bE INnocently mistakEn for a variEtY Of Reasons. FirST, I cAn Judge it To be innOcentLY mistakEn on epist
, Michael Bergmann, Stewar t Cohen, K eithDeR ose ,Tama r Ge ndler, Stephen Grim m, Daniel Nolan, Phili p Qui nn ,  Way n eRiggs , Ted S i de r ,  El eo no reSt u mp , Ern est  Sosa,Fritz Warf iel d,  and Linda Z a gz ebski forthe ir helpful c omm ents i ndis c ussio n a nd on  earli e r vers ions of t he paper. Express i v is m an d Innocent Mistak e sA uthor(s): Char lie Ku rt h  S o u rce : E thics, Vol .124,N o. 2 (J a nu a r y  20 1 4), pp. 370-3 83 Publishe d  by : TheUn ive r sity o f Chi ca g o P ress Stable  URL : http:// www.js t or.org/ s table/1 0.1086 /67 343 5. A c ce ss ed:  1 3 /12 / 20 131 1:0 0 Your u se  o f the  JST O R a rchi veindi cates  your accepta nce  oft heTerms  & Co ndit io ns of  Use,avail ab le at. http://w ww.j stor.org/ pag e/ inf o/ about / polici es/ ter ms.jsp.  JSTORi s a  n o t - fo r-profit service t ha t he lps scho lars,r es ea r chers, a nd  st uden t s  disc over ,  u se, andbuildu po na widera nge of  c ont ent  in a trus ted di gital ar chive .  We use inform a tion technolo g ya n dt ools  to  increase p rodu c tivi ty a n dfac i litat e new  f o rm s  of scholarship. Fo rmore i nform ation about J STOR, plea s e contactsupp o rt @ jstor.org.. Th e Uni versity of ChicagoPress  is coll aborating w ith JSTO R t o d igi tiz e ,  p reserve and e x t endac cess to  Et hics. h ttp :// www .js to r.org Thi s conten tdo wn lo ade d fro m  128.252 .5 8.2 43  on  Fri, 13 Dec  2013  11: 00 :2 3  AM  All us e  s u b ject  t oJSTO R T er ms an d Co n dit ions Ex pressivis m a n d In no ce nt Mist akes*CharlieKu rth AllanGi bba rd mai n t ains tha t his plan-based expres s ivism a llo ws fo r aparticula r t ype of  in n ocentmistak e: Ica n a g r ee th a t  y our  p lan to F m a k essense  ð say,  becaus e it was based ona dvi ce from someo neyout r us tÞ, wh i leno n eth e l ess insisting t hat it isin c or rect ðe.g. ,  be ca use you  chosea bad advisor Þ. Howeve r, SteveDa skal h asrecently a rgued th at therea re si g ni fican t l imitat io nsin Gi bbard' s  ac count  of ho wwe can  be m is taken ab out the normative judgm ent we  make . T his essay  re f ine s Gibbard 's a ccount inord erto sh ow- c ontra  Das k al -th a t exp ress i vists can de liv e r  a  surprising l y rob ust f orm of nor mati vity objectivity. I can judge yo ur p l a n t o v a cati on  at the shoretobe i nnocentl ymistaken fo r a vari et y  of r easons . Firs t, I ca n ju d ge itto b e i nnocently  mi st a ken onep is t 
, Michael_Bergmann, Stewart_Cohen, Keith DeRose, Tamar_Gendler, Stephen_Grimm,_Daniel Nolan,_Philip_Quinn, Wayne Riggs,_Ted Sider, Eleonore_Stump, Ernest Sosa, Fritz_Warfield, and Linda_Zagzebski_for their helpful comments in discussion and on earlier versions of the paper. Expressivism_and_Innocent Mistakes_Author(s):_Charlie_Kurth Source: Ethics, Vol. 124,_No. 2 (January 2014), pp._370-383 Published_by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL:_http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673435._Accessed: 13/12/2013 11:00_Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance_of the Terms & Conditions of_Use, available at._http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp._JSTOR_is a not-for-profit service_that helps scholars, researchers, and students_discover, use, and build upon a_wide range of content in a trusted_digital archive. We use information technology_and tools to increase productivity_and facilitate_new forms of scholarship. For_more information about_JSTOR, please_contact support@jstor.org.. The_University of Chicago Press is collaborating_with JSTOR to_digitize, preserve and extend access to_Ethics._http://www.jstor.org This content_downloaded_from_128.252.58.243 on_Fri, 13 Dec_2013_11:00:23 AM_All_use subject to JSTOR Terms and_Conditions_Expressivism and Innocent Mistakes*Charlie Kurth Allan Gibbard_maintains that his plan-based_expressivism_allows for a particular_type of innocent mistake: I_can agree that your plan to_F makes_sense ðsay,_because it was based on advice from someone you trustÞ, while_nonetheless insisting that it is incorrect_ðe.g., because you chose_a bad_advisorÞ._However, Steve Daskal_has_recently argued_that there are significant limitations in Gibbard's_account of_how we can be mistaken about_the normative judgment we_make._This essay refines Gibbard's account in_order to show-contra Daskal-that expressivists can_deliver a surprisingly robust form_of_normativity_objectivity. I can judge your_plan to vacation at the shore_to be innocently_mistaken for a variety of reasons. First,_I_can judge it to be innocently_mistaken_on epist