sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_n5.html Buffington, M. L. (2008). What is Web 2.0 and how can it further art education? Art Education, 6/(3), 36-41. Bureau of the Census (2011). Urban area criteria for the 2010 census. Federal Register, 76(164), 53030-53043. Burls, A., Caron, L., Cleret de Langavant, G., Dondorp, W., Harstall, C., Pathak-Sen, P., Hofmann, B. (2011). Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework. International Journal o f Technology Assessment in Health Care, 27, 230-237. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000250 Burnett, J., Senker, P., & Walker, K. (2009). Introduction. In J. Burnett, P. Senker, & K. Walker (Eds.), The myths o f technology: Innovation and inequality (pp. 1-22). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Buss, S. (2011). Personal autonomy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia o f Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/personal-autonomy/ 283 Callister, L. C., Luthy, K. E., Thompson, P., & Memmott, R. J. (2009). Ethical reasoning in baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 76(4), 499-510. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104612 Campbell, C. C. (2011). A broader but shallower social network. St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved from http://www.stltoday.com/ Canole, G. (2007). An international comparison of the relationship between policy and practice in e-leaming. In R. Andrews & C. Haythomwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook o f e-leaming research. Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com.proxyl.ncu.edu/hdbk_eleamingrsch/ Carr-Chellman, A. (2005). Global perspectives on e-leaming: Rhetoric and reality. Thousand O
sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_n5.html Buffington, M. L. (2008). What is Web 2.0 and how can it further art education? Art Education, 6/(3), 36 - 41. Bureau of the Census (2011). Urban area standard for the 2010 census. Federal Register, 76(164), 53030 - 53043. Burls, A., Caron, L., Cleret de Langavant, G., Dondorp, W., Harstall, C., Pathak - Sen, P., Hofmann, B. (2011). tackle ethical issues in health technology assessment: A project framework. International Journal o f Technology Assessment in Health Care, 27, 230 - 237. doi:10.1017 / S0266462311000250 Burnett, J., Senker, P., & Walker, K. (2009). presentation. In J. Burnett, P. Senker, & K. Walker (Eds .), The myths o f engineering: initiation and inequality (pp. 1 - 22). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Buss, S. (2011). Personal autonomy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed .), The Stanford Encyclopedia o f doctrine (Fall 2011 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/personal-autonomy/ 283 Callister, L. C., Luthy, K. E., Thompson, P., & Memmott, R. J. (2009). Ethical reasoning in baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 76(4), 499 - 510. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104612 Campbell, C. C. (2011). A broader but shallow social network. St. Louis Post - Dispatch. Retrieved from http://www.stltoday.com/ Canole, G. (2007). An international comparison of the relationship between policy and practice in vitamin e - leaming. In R. Andrews & C. Haythomwaite (Eds .), The Sage handbook o f e - leaming research. remember from http://www.sage-ereference.com.proxyl.ncu.edu/hdbk_eleamingrsch/ Carr - Chellman, A. (2005). Global perspectives on e - leaming: Rhetoric and reality. Thousand oxygen
sagf-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedla/Article_n5.html Bofdingtoi, M. L. (2008). Shat is Deb 2.0 and how can it further ert wducaupon? Art Education, 6/(3), 36-41. Bjreau of nhe Censuw (2011). Ucban area critermz for tmz 2010 cehdus. Yeveral Register, 76(164), 53030-53043. Burls, A., Waron, L., Cleret dd Pangavant, G., Dondorp, W., Harstall, C., Paehak-Sen, P., Hofmann, B. (2011). Tasklimd etgpccl issues in health technology zssessmtnt: A proposed frakework. International Journwl o f Technology Assedsment in Hgzltr Care, 27, 230-237. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000250 Burnett, J., Senker, P., & Wzlker, K. (2009). Introduction. In J. Burndtt, P. Senker, & K. Wqlkft (Eds.), The myvhs o s technology: Innovathon and inequality (pp. 1-22). Nxw Yirk: Peter Lang Publisiing. Buss, S. (2011). Personaj autonomf. Nn E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Srabford Encfcloowdix o f Pgilosoohy (Fall 2011 Edifion). Retrieced from http://plato.suansird.edu/archivea/fall2011/egtwies/personal-autonomy/ 283 Callister, L. C., Lutvy, I. E., Thompson, P., & Memmott, R. J. (2009). Ethical reasonijg in bacsalaureate nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 76(4), 499-510. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104612 Campueul, E. C. (2011). A vrlader but shallower social network. St. Louis Pjat-Cixpatch. Retrievcd from http://www.stlyofau.som/ Canole, G. (2007). An incsrhational comparisoj of thg relarionship fetwren policy and practice in w-leaming. In G. Anerews & C. Haythomwante (Eds.), The Rage handnook o f e-leaming reseaxch. Refrieved frol http://www.axge-ereference.com.oroqyl.nwu.edu/hdbk_eleamingrsch/ Carr-Shellman, E. (2005). Glpbal pefspevtives on e-leamijg: Rhcdoric and reality. Hhouscnd O
sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_n5.html Buffington, M. L. (2008). What is and can it art education? Art the (2011). Urban area for the 2010 Federal Register, 76(164), 53030-53043. Burls, A., L., Cleret de Langavant, G., Dondorp, W., Harstall, C., Pathak-Sen, P., Hofmann, B. Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework. International Journal o Technology in Care, 230-237. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000250 Burnett, J., Senker, P., & Walker, K. (2009). Introduction. In J. Burnett, P. Senker, K. Walker (Eds.), The myths o f technology: and inequality (pp. 1-22). York: Peter Lang Publishing. Buss, (2011). autonomy. In N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia o Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/personal-autonomy/ 283 Callister, L. C., Luthy, K. E., Thompson, P., & R. J. reasoning in nursing Nursing 76(4), 499-510. doi: C. C. (2011). A broader but St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved from http://www.stltoday.com/ Canole, G. An international of the relationship between policy and in e-leaming. In R. Andrews & C. Haythomwaite The Sage handbook o f e-leaming research. Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com.proxyl.ncu.edu/hdbk_eleamingrsch/ Carr-Chellman, A. (2005). Global perspectives Rhetoric and reality. Thousand
sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmEdia/ArticlE_n5.htmL BuFfiNgTon, M. l. (2008). WhaT is Web 2.0 and how caN It fuRther art education? Art EdUcatiOn, 6/(3), 36-41. bUreaU Of The CeNsus (2011). UrbAN aREA crItErIa fOr THe 2010 CensuS. FeDeral ReGister, 76(164), 53030-53043. BurlS, A., CArOn, L., Cleret de LANgAvant, G., DondOrp, w., Harstall, C., PaThaK-Sen, P., HOfManN, b. (2011). TackLinG ethiCal issUEs in heAlth technOlOGy asseSSment: A pROPoSed fRamework. InternatiONaL journal o f TechnOlogy ASsESsMENt iN HeAlth Care, 27, 230-237. doI:10.1017/S0266462311000250 burneTT, J., SenkeR, p., & WALKEr, K. (2009). iNtroduction. In j. Burnett, P. SeNKer, & k. WalkeR (EDs.), THE myths O f tecHnOLogY: Innovation And iNequality (Pp. 1-22). New YORk: Peter lAng PublIshing. busS, S. (2011). PErsoNAl AuTonOmY. in E. n. zaLta (eD.), ThE StanforD ENcYclopEdia O F pHIlosOphY (FalL 2011 EditIon). Retrieved fRom Http://PLatO.stanFord.eDu/arChIves/fAll2011/entRies/pErSonal-autonomy/ 283 CaLlisTer, L. C., LuthY, K. E., thOmpSoN, P., & MemMOtt, R. J. (2009). EThiCal ReasoniNg in bacCAlaUrEATE nUrsing students. NursInG eThIcs, 76(4), 499-510. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104612 CaMpbell, c. c. (2011). A BrOAder but sHaLloWer sOCIal neTworK. st. louis PosT-DispaTCh. reTrieved FrOm http://WwW.stLtoDay.coM/ canoLe, G. (2007). An iNternatiOnal cOMparison of the rELationship betWEeN POlICy anD prActice in e-leAminG. in R. ANdreWS & C. hayTHomwaIte (EdS.), THE SAGe handbook o f e-leaminG rEsearcH. RetrIeved from http://Www.sage-ereFEREnce.com.pRoxyL.NcU.Edu/hdbk_eleaminGrsch/ carr-ChellmAN, A. (2005). Global PerspEctives oN e-leaming: rHEtoric anD reAliTy. THouSANd o
sage-ereference.com/hdbk_n ewmedia/Ar ticle _n5 .ht ml  Buf fing ton, M. L. (20 0 8).What is Web 2.0 and ho w can  i t  fur t he r art  educat i on ? Art  E du cat io n ,6/(3) , 3 6-41. B ureau of t heCe nsus (2011). Ur ban area c rit eria for the  20 10 cen su s.F edera l R egist er, 76 ( 164),53030-530 43 .  Burls ,  A., Ca r o n,  L.,  Cleret de Langav a nt ,  G., Dondorp,W., Ha rs t al l ,  C. , P athak-Sen,  P ., Ho f mann, B .  ( 2 0 1 1). Tackling ethi cal issuesi n h ealthte chn o logy a ssess me n t:A proposedfram ework. In ternat i onal Jo u rnal of Tech nol ogy  Ass e ss me ntin Hea l th  Ca r e,27, 230- 23 7.  doi: 10.1 0 1 7 / S026 646 2311 00025 0 Burnett, J. , S enke r , P ., &Walke r, K .(2009 ). Int roduc ti on. In J. Burne tt,P. Senker , &  K . W al ker ( E ds.),The  my ths o f  techno l ogy :I n n ov ation and inequali ty ( pp . 1-22).  New Y o rk :P eter Lan gPub lish i n g. Bu ss,S .(2011).Person a lau tonomy.  I n E. N .Zal ta(Ed.) ,  The  Stanf ord Ency clope d ia o f Philoso p hy (Fall 2011 Ed i t io n ). R etr ieved fromhttp : //pl ato. s ta nfo r d.edu /arch iv e s/ f all2011/entries/per so nal-au tonom y/ 283 Callis ter, L. C. , L uthy, K.  E., Th o mpson, P., & M emmot t, R. J. ( 2 009). Et hical  reasoni ng in bac c a laureate  nu rsi ngstu d e nt s. Nursing Et h i cs,76 (4), 49 9-5 10. doi : 1 0.1 177 /09 69 733009104 612 Camp be ll ,C.  C.  (201 1 ). A bro ad erbu t s hallo w er soc ial n etwo rk .S t.Louis P o st - D ispa tc h.  Ret rie ve d fro m ht t p:/ /www.st ltoday.co m/C anol e,  G . (2007 ). An interna ti onal compa ri son  of th e relation ship between policy and practic e i n e-l eami ng. In R.  An drews& C .  Hayth omwait e (Ed s. ),T h e Sag e ha ndb oo k o f e-le a m ing  rese ar ch.Retriev ed from http://www . sag e-ereference. com .pro x y l. ncu . ed u /hd bk _ ele a m ingrsch/ Carr-C hellman, A .( 20 05). Globa l  pe rs pective s on e- leami n g: Rhet oric andreality.Th ousa n d  O
sage-ereference.com/hdbk_newmedia/Article_n5.html Buffington,_M. L._(2008). What is Web_2.0 and_how_can it_further_art education? Art_Education, 6/(3), 36-41._Bureau of the Census_(2011). Urban area_criteria_for the 2010 census. Federal Register, 76(164), 53030-53043. Burls, A., Caron, L., Cleret de_Langavant,_G., Dondorp,_W.,_Harstall,_C., Pathak-Sen, P., Hofmann, B._(2011). Tackling ethical issues in_health technology_assessment: A proposed framework. International Journal o f_Technology_Assessment in Health_Care, 27, 230-237. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000250 Burnett, J., Senker, P., &_Walker, K. (2009). Introduction. In J._Burnett, P. Senker,_&_K._Walker (Eds.), The myths_o f technology: Innovation and inequality_(pp. 1-22). New York: Peter Lang_Publishing. Buss, S. (2011). Personal autonomy. In_E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford_Encyclopedia o f Philosophy (Fall_2011 Edition)._Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/personal-autonomy/ 283 Callister,_L. C., Luthy,_K. E.,_Thompson, P., &_Memmott, R. J. (2009). Ethical reasoning_in baccalaureate nursing_students. Nursing Ethics, 76(4), 499-510. doi:_10.1177/0969733009104612_Campbell, C. C._(2011)._A_broader but_shallower social network._St._Louis Post-Dispatch._Retrieved_from http://www.stltoday.com/ Canole, G. (2007). An_international_comparison of the relationship between policy and_practice in e-leaming. In_R._Andrews & C. Haythomwaite_(Eds.), The Sage handbook o_f e-leaming research. Retrieved from http://www.sage-ereference.com.proxyl.ncu.edu/hdbk_eleamingrsch/_Carr-Chellman, A._(2005). Global_perspectives on e-leaming: Rhetoric and reality. Thousand O