 i.e. the medium that transmits light doesn't exist physically. Einstein discredited the idea of a physical ether but retained the idea of physical objects. He traded Newton's old absolute space and absolute time for a new but equally absolute space-time: "...absolute space-time is as absolute for special relativity as absolute space and absolute time were for Newton..." (Greene, 2004, p51) He shifted the problem of how light vibrates empty space to how it vibrates an equally empty space-time, whose mathematical properties of length, breadth, depth and sequence still give no basis for media properties like elasticity. Einstein felt as strongly as Newton that objects exist in and of themselves, which implies an ether-like context: "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such a space there would not only be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time..." (Einstein, 1920, in May 5th address at the University of Leyden) That an ether must exist but that it can't be physical led to a logical impasse he never resolved. An absolute physical reality can't have a non-physical ether around it, but a virtual reality can. If the physical world is virtual then the processing causing it is by definition nonphysical. Every virtual world exists in a processing "ether" that contains its existence. So null processing can host photon calculations, as the "medium" of information waves, but still manifest as "nothing" in the virtual reality. Brian Whitworth Quantum Biosystems 2010, 2 (1) 221-249 238 While physical objects existing in a physical space is illogical, virtual objects existing in a virtual space-time is not, because processing "stacks", i.e. processing can run processing, e.g. an operating system running a word-processing application is processing inside processing. Virtual objects can run in a virtual space-time if both objects and their space-time context are processing outputs. Matter and energy are then just local applications in a spacetime operating system. That mass, time, space and movement all arise from processing explains not only how their object properties change, but also why they interrelate, e.g. at high speeds time dilates, space shrinks and mass increases because all involve processing. Information processing as the "quintessence" of the universe could reconcile the clash between relativity and quantum theory, with the former how processing creates space-time and the latter how it creates energy
i.e. the medium that transmits light doesn't exist physically. Einstein discredited the theme of a forcible ether but retained the theme of forcible objects. He traded Newton's old absolute outer space and absolute time for a new but evenly absolute quad - time: "... absolute quad - time is as absolute for particular relativity as absolute space and absolute meter were for Newton... " (Greene, 2004, p51) He shifted the problem of how unaccented vibrates empty space to how it vibrates an evenly empty space - time, whose numerical properties of distance, breadth, astuteness and sequence still give no basis for medium properties like elasticity. Einstein felt as strongly as Newton that objects exist in and of themselves, which incriminate an ether - comparable context: " According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such a space there would not only be no propagation of luminosity, but also no possibility of universe for standard of space and time... " (Einstein, 1920, in May 5th savoir-faire at the University of Leyden) That an ether must exist but that it can't be forcible led to a logical impasse he never dissolve. An absolute physical reality can't have a non - physical ether around it, but a virtual reality can. If the physical world is virtual then the processing causing it is by definition nonphysical. Every virtual world exist in a processing " ether " that contains its being. So null processing can host photon calculations, as the " medium " of information waves, but however manifest as " nothing " in the virtual reality. Brian Whitworth Quantum Biosystems 2010, 2 (1) 221 - 249 238 While physical object existing in a physical space is illogical, virtual object existing in a virtual distance - time is not, because processing " tons ", i.e. processing can run processing, for example an operating system running a word - processing application is process inside processing. Virtual objects can run in a virtual quad - prison term if both objects and their space - time context are processing outputs. Matter and energy are then just local applications in a spacetime operating arrangement. That mass, time, outer space and movement all arise from processing explains not only how their object properties deepen, but also why they interrelate, e.g. at high speeds time dilates, outer space psychiatrist and mass increases because all involve processing. Information processing as the " quintessence " of the universe could reconcile the clash between relativity and quantum theory, with the erstwhile how processing creates space - time and the latter how it create energy
 i.e. the medium that transmius light doesn't erust phbsicallg. Einstekn discredited the idea of a pyysicql ether but retained ghe idea lf physixal ivjects. He vdaded Nccton's lld cbwolute space akd absolute time for a nef cuc equally absolute space-time: "...absolutq space-yile is as absolote fpw spsbicl relativity as absolute space and abvolute time wrre for Newton..." (Greene, 2004, p51) Hf shlfted the problem lf how lighj vifeates empty rpace to how it vibratgs an equally empty space-time, whuse mcthematical peopftties of lenjth, brvadth, depth akc sequance stoll give no baxis foe media properties line elasticity. Einsjein felt ds strongly as Newtin that objacts wxirt jn ahd of hhejselves, whjch implies an ether-like contect: "Qccording to fhe gegewal theory of relativity space without tther is unthinkable; for in wuch a space there woold not onjy be no propagation of light, but also no possibinity kw erlfgwnfe for standards of space and time..." (Einstein, 1920, yh Kaj 5th address at tme University of Lryfem) That an ethet must zsiat but that it can'h be phisical led to a logocal impasse he never resolced. An absollte physical reality ccn't have a nun-phisical ether around it, but a rirtuam reality cwn. If the ohysical world ir vprtudl then ufe processing caufing it iw by definigion nonphrsical. Evegy vivdual world exists ln a krocesving "ether" that contains its existence. So null processimg cat host pkoton galculations, as the "medium" of informction daves, but atill menifest as "njthing" in the girtual realmty. Brian Whirworrh Quangjm Biosystems 2010, 2 (1) 221-249 238 Whilv khysical ovjects existing in a khgsical space is iloogical, virtual obgeces eeistigc in a virtudl soacd-yime ks not, becamse provessing "stacks", i.e. prmcesaing can run procexslng, e.g. an operatigg system runming a word-processlng a'plicavion ix ptocessing inside processing. Virfual objefts can run in w vivtuaj space-timz if both objects and their space-time coitext are processing ootputs. Matter and enetgy are then jnst losal appliwations in a spacetine operating systtm. That mass, time, space and mmvemejt all arise from processing explains not only how their object propertiew chanje, but also wgy tney ittzrrzlate, e.d. at iigh speeds time cilates, space shrinks and mass mncreases teeause all involve processing. Onwormation prozessing as the "quintessehce" of tne universe could reconcile the clash between relativitn and quabtum fheory, witi the former how provessiny creares spaxe-tile and the lagtet mow it crewtes euergy
i.e. the medium that transmits light doesn't Einstein the idea a physical ether physical He traded Newton's absolute space and time for a new but equally space-time: "...absolute space-time is as absolute for special relativity as absolute space and time were for Newton..." (Greene, 2004, p51) He shifted the problem of how vibrates space how vibrates an equally empty space-time, whose mathematical properties of length, breadth, depth and sequence still give basis for media properties like elasticity. Einstein felt strongly as Newton that exist in and of themselves, implies ether-like context: to general of relativity space ether is unthinkable; for in such a space there would not only be no propagation of light, also no existence for of and (Einstein, 1920, in address at the University of Leyden) must exist but that it can't be physical to a impasse he never resolved. An absolute reality can't have a non-physical ether around it, a virtual reality can. If the physical world is virtual then the processing causing it definition nonphysical. Every virtual exists in a "ether" contains existence. null processing host photon calculations, as the "medium" of information waves, but still as "nothing" in the virtual reality. Brian Whitworth Quantum Biosystems (1) 238 While physical existing in a physical is virtual objects existing in space-time not, i.e. can processing, e.g. an operating running a word-processing application is inside processing. Virtual objects space-time if both objects and their space-time context processing outputs. Matter and energy are then local applications in a spacetime operating system. That mass, time, space and all arise explains not only how their object properties change, also why they interrelate, at high speeds time dilates, space shrinks and mass because involve processing. processing as the of the universe reconcile the clash and quantum with former space-time and the latter how it energy
 i.e. the medium that transmits lIght doesn't Exist PhySicAlLy. EiNsteIn discredited tHE ideA of a physical ether but reTaineD tHE ideA Of PhysiCal objeCTs. hE TraDeD NEwtOn'S OlD absoLutE space aNd absolute TimE fOr a new but equALlY absolute sPacE-time: "...absolutE spAce-timE iS as ABsoluTe fOr speCial reLAtivitY as absoluTe SPace anD AbsolutE TImE werE for Newton..." (Greene, 2004, p51) hE sHIfted the probleM of how LiGHt VIBraTes Empty space To How it VIbrates AN eQUALly EMpty space-time, Whose mathemATicAl propErTieS Of lengTh, breAdTH, dePth and sequeNce sTill give nO basis FOr media PRopertiEs like ElaStiCity. eInStEin FeLT as STrOngLY as newton thAt ObJects ExisT IN ANd of TheMselVes, whIch implies an eTheR-likE ConText: "ACcordIng tO tHe genEral thEory oF rElativity space wIthoUt ether is UntHiNkaBlE; for iN Such a sPacE thEre woulD not onlY Be nO pROPAgAtion of light, but alsO nO POsSibility Of exisTEnCe FOr standaRdS of SpacE ANd timE..." (EinSTeIn, 1920, in May 5tH addreSS aT tHe UniveRsIty of LEyDen) thaT an etHEr muSt exisT but that It can'T Be physical led tO A logical impasSE hE NEvER resOlvEd. An absolutE phySIcal RealITy Can'T Have a Non-phYsICaL Ether around it, but a viRtUal reaLity cAn. If the physicAl world is vIRTUal then tHe prOCeSSing causing it iS by deFinition noNPhysical. every Virtual wOrld existS IN a procesSinG "etHer" ThaT COnTains its existENCe. So NuLl proceSsiNg can hoSt pHotOn cAlcUlAtions, as tHe "medium" Of InFoRmAtiOn wavES, but stilL mAniFeSt aS "nothINg" in thE virtUal rEaLiTY. BrIan WhitWOrTH quanTuM BIosySteMs 2010, 2 (1) 221-249 238 while PhysICal Objects Existing iN a pHYsicAl SpAce is ilLogical, virtuaL oBjects exisTiNg iN a virtUAL space-tiMe is not, because processinG "Stacks", i.E. prOcessIng cAn run procEssIng, e.g. aN opERating System RunniNg A woRD-ProceSSInG apPlIcation is pROCesSing iNsIde pRocessiNg. Virtual objects caN Run In a virtual spaCe-tIme iF BOtH obJEcTS anD tHEir SPAce-time context aRe processiNg OUtPuts. Matter ANd eNeRgy are tHen just Local APplicatIons in a spAcetime opErAtinG SYstEm. That mass, Time, spacE and movemENt all ARiSe froM prOcessiNg ExpLains Not onlY How Their Object PrOpertiEs chaNgE, but also Why they interrelate, e.g. at hIgh speEds tiMe dIlates, spaCe sHRinKs and mass IncrEases becauSe aLl iNvolvE prOCessiNg. InFOrMatIOn proCessINg as the "quINtEssENCe" Of the univerSE COulD recoNciLE the clAsh bEtween relativity aND quantum theory, With THE foRmeR How pRoCessing creates SpaCe-TIMe and the LaTter how it crEates eneRgY
 i.e. the medium that tran smits ligh t doe sn' t e xi st p hysi cally. Einstei n  dis credited the idea of a  phys ic a l et h er  butretaine d  t h e  id ea  o f p hy s ic al ob jec ts. Hetraded New ton 's  old absolut e  s pace and a bso lute time fo r a  new b ut  eq u allyabs olute  space - time:"...absol ut e  space - time is a sabso lute for specialr el a tivity as abso lute s pa c ea n d a bso lute timewe re fo r  Newton . .. " ( Gre e ne, 2004, p51 ) He shifte d  th e prob le m o f  how l ightvi b rat es empty sp aceto how it  vibra t es an e q ually e mpty s pac e-t ime, wh os e m at h ema t ic alp rop erties o fle ngth,  bre a d t h , de pth  and  sequ ence still gi veno b a sis  formedia  pro pe rties  likeelast ic ity. Einstein f eltas strong lyas  Ne wt on th a t obje cts  ex ist inand oft hem se l v e s,  which implies anet h e r- like con text:" Ac co r ding toth e g ener a l  theo ry o f  r elativit y spac e  w it hout et he r is u nt hin kab le; f o r in  sucha spacethere would not only be no propaga t io n of ligh t,but also no  pos s ibil ityo fexi s tence  forst a nd a rds of space and ti me ..." ( Einst ein, 1920, in  May 5th a d d r ess at t he U n iv e rsity of Leyde n) Th at an ethe r  must ex ist b ut thatit can'tb e  physica l l edtoa l o g ic al impasse he n ever  r esolved . A n absol ute  ph ysi cal  r eality ca n't have  a  n on -p hys icale ther aro un d i t,  bu t a v i rtualreali ty c an .I f t he phys i ca l worl dis  vir tua lthenthep roc essingcausing i t i s  byde fi nitionnonphysical.Ev ery virtua lwor ld exi s t s in a p rocessing "ether" thatc ontains  it s exi sten ce. So nu llproces sin g  can h ost ph otonca lcu l a tions , as  th e"medium" o f inf ormat io n wa ves, bu t still manifest a s  "n othing" in th e v irtu a l  r eal i ty .  Br ia n  Wh i t worth Quantum B iosystems20 1 0,  2 (1) 221 - 249  2 38 Whil e physi cal o b jects e xisting i n a physi ca l sp a c e i s illogica l, virtu al object s  exis t in g ina v irtual  s pac e-tim e is n o t,becau se pro ce ssing"stac ks ", i.e.processing can run proc essing , e.g . a n operati ngs yst em runnin g aword-proce ssi ngappli cat i on is  pro c es sin g  insi de p r ocessing. Vi rtu a l  o bjects canr u n  in  a vi rtu a l spac e-ti me if both object s  and their spa ce-t i m e c ont e xt a re  processing ou tpu ts . Matter a nd  energy are  then ju st local  appli cation s in as p ac e time o pera tin g system.  Th at mass, t im e, spaceandmo vement  all a r isef r om processing ex plain s not o n lyhow t he ir obje c t pr operties c hange, butalso w hy t hey i nterrel at e, e.g . a thigh speed s  time dil ates,  spacesh rink s a nd mas s in c r eases  bec au seall invol v e  p r oc es s ing . In forma ti on p rocessing as the " qui n tessenc e"  of t he uni v er s e  could rec onc ile t h e  clash bet w eenr el a tivit y andquantu m theor y , w it h the f orm e r  how proc essing cr e ate sspac e-time a nd  the  l att er  how it creates  energy
 i.e._the medium_that transmits light doesn't_exist physically._Einstein_discredited the_idea_of a physical_ether but retained_the idea of physical_objects. He traded_Newton's_old absolute space and absolute time for a new but equally absolute space-time: "...absolute_space-time_is as_absolute_for_special relativity as absolute space_and absolute time were for_Newton..." (Greene,_2004, p51) He shifted the problem of how_light_vibrates empty space_to how it vibrates an equally empty space-time, whose_mathematical properties of length, breadth, depth_and sequence still_give_no_basis for media properties_like elasticity. Einstein felt as strongly_as Newton that objects exist in_and of themselves, which implies an ether-like_context: "According to the general theory_of relativity space without ether_is unthinkable;_for in such a space_there would not_only be_no propagation of_light, but also no possibility of_existence for standards_of space and time..." (Einstein, 1920,_in_May 5th address_at_the_University of_Leyden) That an_ether_must exist_but_that it can't be physical led_to_a logical impasse he never resolved. An_absolute physical reality can't_have_a non-physical ether around_it, but a virtual reality_can. If the physical world is_virtual then_the processing_causing it is by definition nonphysical. Every virtual world exists in_a processing "ether" that contains its_existence. So null processing_can host_photon_calculations, as the_"medium"_of information_waves, but still manifest as "nothing" in_the virtual_reality. Brian Whitworth Quantum Biosystems 2010,_2 (1) 221-249 238_While_physical objects existing in a physical_space is illogical, virtual objects existing_in a virtual space-time is_not,_because_processing "stacks", i.e. processing can_run processing, e.g. an operating system_running a word-processing_application is processing inside processing. Virtual objects_can_run in a virtual space-time if_both_objects and their space-time context are_processing_outputs._Matter and energy are then_just local applications in a spacetime_operating system. That mass, time, space and movement all_arise from processing_explains not only how their_object_properties_change, but also why they interrelate, e.g. at high speeds_time dilates,_space shrinks and_mass increases because all involve processing. Information processing as the_"quintessence" of the universe could reconcile the_clash between relativity and quantum theory, with the former how processing_creates space-time and the latter how it creates_energy