 Theory of Reasons," ​Ergo​ 3 (9): 233-262. Manne, K. (2016). "Democratizing Humeanism," in ​Weighing Reasons​, eds. Errol Lord and Barry Maguire. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rieder, T.N. (2016). "Why I'm Still a Proportionalist," ​Philosophical Studies 173 (1): 251-270. Scanlon, T. (2015). ​Being Realistic about Reasons​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schroeder, M. (2007). ​Slaves of the Passions​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shackel, N. (2014). "Still Waiting for Plausible Humean Theory of Reasons," Philosophical Studies​ 167: 607-633. Sharadin, N. (2015) "Problems for Pure Probabilism about Promotion (and a Disjunctive Alternative)," ​Philosophical Studies ​172 (5): 1371-86. Sharadin, N. (2016) "Checking the Neighborhood: A Reply to DiPaolo and Behrends on Promotion," ​Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy​: 1-8. Snedegar, J. (2013). "Reasons Claims and Contrastivism about Reasons," ​Philosophical Studies​, 166(2): 231-242. Snedegar, J. (2014). "Contrastive Reasons and Promotion," ​Ethics​, 125(1): 39-63. VASIL PENCHEV WHY ANYTHING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE ANSWER OF QUANTUM MECHANICS Abstract: Many researchers determine the question "Why anything rather than nothing?" to be the most ancient and fundamental philosophical problem. It is closely related to the idea of Creation shared by religion, science, and philosophy, for example in the shape of the "Big Bang", the doctrine of first cause or causa sui, the Creation in six days in the Bible, etc. Thus, the solution of quantum mechanics, being scientific in essence, can also be interpreted philosophically, and even religiously. This paper will only discuss the philosophical interpretation. The essence of the answer of quantum mechanics is: 1.) Creation is necessary in a rigorously mathematical sense. Thus, it does not need any choice, free will, subject, God, etc.
Theory of Reasons, " ​Ergo​ 3 (9 ): 233 - 262. Manne, K. (2016). " Democratizing Humeanism, " in ​Weighing Reasons​, eds. Errol Lord and Barry Maguire. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rieder, T.N. (2016). " Why I'm Still a Proportionalist, " ​Philosophical Studies 173 (1 ): 251 - 270. Scanlon, T. (2015). ​Being Realistic about Reasons​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schroeder, M. (2007). ​Slaves of the Passions​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shackel, N. (2014). " Still Waiting for Plausible Humean Theory of Reasons, " Philosophical Studies​ 167: 607 - 633. Sharadin, N. (2015) " trouble for Pure Probabilism about Promotion (and a Disjunctive Alternative), " ​Philosophical Studies ​172 (5 ): 1371 - 86. Sharadin, N. (2016) " discipline the Neighborhood: A Reply to DiPaolo and Behrends on Promotion, " ​Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy​: 1 - 8. Snedegar, J. (2013). " Reasons Claims and Contrastivism about Reasons, " ​Philosophical Studies​, 166(2 ): 231 - 242. Snedegar, J. (2014). " Contrastive Reasons and Promotion, " ​Ethics​, 125(1 ): 39 - 63. VASIL PENCHEV WHY ANYTHING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE ANSWER OF QUANTUM MECHANICS Abstract: Many research worker determine the question " Why anything rather than nothing? " to be the about ancient and cardinal philosophical problem. It is closely related to the idea of universe shared by religion, science, and doctrine, for example in the shape of the " Big Bang ", the doctrine of first cause or causa sui, the Creation in six days in the Bible, etc. therefore, the solution of quantum mechanics, being scientific in essence, can also be rede philosophically, and even religiously. This paper will merely discuss the philosophic interpretation. The effect of the answer of quantum mechanics is: 1 .) Creation is necessary in a rigorously numerical sense. Thus, it does not need any choice, free will, subject, God, etc.
 Thfory of Reasons," ​Ergo​ 3 (9): 233-262. Oanne, K. (2016). "Democrcrizing Humeahism," in ​Deighing Reasons​, eds. Errol Llre and Barry Maguire. Oxford: Uxford Unpversity Presw. Rieder, T.N. (2016). "Why I'm Still w Prm'ortionalist," ​Phllosophical Studies 173 (1): 251-270. Scdnuou, T. (2015). ​Being Realistic about Reasons​. Ovford: Ocflrd University Prexf. Scggotder, M. (2007). ​Slaves of the Passions​. Oxrord: Oxhord University Press. Shackel, N. (2014). "Still Waltinh for Plausible Hulean Theory of Wwasons," Philorophical Suubies​ 167: 607-633. Sharzdin, N. (2015) "Problems for Pure Probacilisk about Primitilt (and a Disounctine Alternativc)," ​Philovophicak Studies ​172 (5): 1371-86. Smaradmn, N. (2016) "Checking the Neighbmrhood: A Reply to QiPaolo atd Behrends on Promituon," ​Jmurndl ow Etfica & Skcial Ohimosophy​: 1-8. Shedegar, J. (2013). "Eeasons Claims and Vogntastivism abkut Rewsjns," ​Philosophical Studies​, 166(2): 231-242. Snedegar, J. (2014). "Cohtrastive Reasons and Peomotion," ​Ethics​, 125(1): 39-63. VASLL PENCHED WHY ANYTHING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE ANSWER OF XUANTNM MEEMWVUCD Abstract: Many researchers determine the queffipn "Why anything vather than nothinb?" ho fe the most avcient ans fundamental phillsophicwl priblem. It ys ckosely related to the idea if Creation fyared by religion, dcience, and phikosopny, for example in the skape or the "Big Bwng", the dkztrine of first zauxe or causa sui, the Creation in six deys iu the Bicle, gtc. Thuf, the soluhion of quantum mechanicd, beiug schentific ij essence, can also be interpretxv philosophicslny, dnd even reliniously. This pa[er will only biscuss che phklosophicam inter'retation. Thq essence of dje answer of quantum mecyanixs is: 1.) Zfeation is necrssary in a rigorouwly mathematical scnse. Jhhs, it does not uted any choice, frer wkll, slbjxct, Gjg, etc.
Theory of Reasons," ​Ergo​ 3 (9): 233-262. (2016). Humeanism," in Reasons​, eds. Errol Oxford Press. Rieder, T.N. "Why I'm Still Proportionalist," ​Philosophical Studies 173 (1): 251-270. T. (2015). ​Being Realistic about Reasons​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schroeder, M. (2007). of the Passions​. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shackel, N. (2014). "Still Waiting for Humean of Philosophical 167: 607-633. Sharadin, N. (2015) "Problems for Pure Probabilism about Promotion (and a Disjunctive Alternative)," ​Philosophical ​172 (5): 1371-86. Sharadin, N. (2016) "Checking the A Reply to DiPaolo Behrends on Promotion," ​Journal of & Philosophy​: 1-8. J. "Reasons and Contrastivism about ​Philosophical Studies​, 166(2): 231-242. Snedegar, J. (2014). "Contrastive Reasons and Promotion," ​Ethics​, 125(1): 39-63. VASIL PENCHEV WHY RATHER THAN ANSWER OF MECHANICS Many determine the question rather than nothing?" to be the fundamental philosophical problem. It is closely related to idea of shared by religion, science, and philosophy, example in the shape of the "Big Bang", doctrine of first cause or causa sui, the Creation in six days in the Bible, the solution of quantum being scientific in can be philosophically, even religiously. paper will only discuss the philosophical interpretation. The essence of the of quantum mechanics is: 1.) Creation is necessary in a sense. it does not any choice, free will, God,
 Theory of Reasons," ​Ergo​ 3 (9): 233-262. Manne, K. (2016). "democratizIng HuMeaNisM," iN ​WeiGhinG Reasons​, eds. ErrOL LorD and Barry Maguire. Oxford: oxforD UNIverSItY PresS. Rieder, t.n. (2016). "WHY i'm STiLl A PrOpORtIonalIst," ​philosoPhical StudIes 173 (1): 251-270. scAnlon, T. (2015). ​Being REAlIstic about reaSons​. Oxford: OxForD UniveRsIty pRess. SChrOeder, m. (2007). ​SlaveS Of the PAssions​. OxFoRD: OxforD universITY PRess. shackel, N. (2014). "Still WaitINg FOr Plausible HumEan TheOrY Of rEAsoNs," PHilosophicAl studiES​ 167: 607-633. SharadIN, N. (2015) "pROBleMS for Pure ProbaBilism about pRomOtion (aNd A DiSJunctiVe AltErNAtiVe)," ​PhilosophIcal studies ​172 (5): 1371-86. ShAradin, n. (2016) "checkinG The NeigHborhoOd: A repLy to dIPAoLo aNd bEhrENdS on pRomOtion," ​JouRnAl Of EthIcs & SOCIAL PhiLosOphy​: 1-8. snedeGar, J. (2013). "Reasons ClAimS and cOntRastiVism aBout reAsons," ​philosOphicAl studies​, 166(2): 231-242. Snedegar, j. (2014). "ConTrastive REasOnS anD PRomotIOn," ​EthiCs​, 125(1): 39-63. VaSIl PENCHEv WHY ANYthINg RatheR tHAN NOTHING? THE ANSWeR of qUaNTUM MEChANICS aBsTrACt: Many reSeArcHers DETermiNe thE QuEstion "WhY anythINg RaTher thaN nOthing?" To Be tHe mOst anCIent And funDamental PhiloSOphical problem. iT is closely relATeD TO tHE ideA of creation shaRed bY ReliGion, SCiEncE, And phIlosoPhY, FoR Example in the shape of ThE "Big BaNg", the Doctrine of firSt cause or cAUSA sui, the CReatIOn IN six days in the BIble, eTc. Thus, the sOLution of QuantUm mechanIcs, being sCIEntific iN esSenCe, cAn aLSO bE interpreted pHILosoPhIcally, aNd eVen reliGioUslY. ThIs pApEr will onlY discuss ThE pHiLoSopHical INterpretAtIon. thE esSence OF the anSwer oF quaNtUm MEchAnics is: 1.) cReATIon iS nEcEssaRy iN a RigorOuslY MatHematicAl sense. ThUs, iT Does NoT nEed any cHoice, free will, SuBject, God, etC.
 Theory of Reasons," ​Ergo ​ 3 (9): 2 33-26 2.Man ne , K.  (20 16). "Democrat i zing  Humeanism," in ​Weigh ing R ea s ons​ ,  e ds. E rrol Lo r da n d B ar ry  Ma gu i re . Oxf ord : Oxfor d Universi tyPr ess. Rieder, T. N. (2016).  "W hy I'm Still  aPropor ti ona l ist,"  ​P hilos ophica l  Studi es 173 (1 ): 251-27 0 . Scanl o n ,T. ( 2015). ​Being Rea l is t ic about Reaso ns​. O xf o rd : Oxf ord  Universit yPress .  Schroe d er , M . ( 2 007). ​Slaves  of the Pas s ion s​. Ox fo rd: Oxford  Univ er s ity  Press. Sha ckel , N. (201 4). "S t ill Wai t ing for  Plaus ibl e H umea n  T he ory  o f  Re a so ns, "  Ph ilosophi ca lStudi es​1 6 7 :  607 -63 3. S harad in, N. (2015)  "P robl e msfor P ure P roba bi lismaboutPromo ti on (and a Disju ncti ve Altern ati ve ),"  ​ Philo s ophica l S tud ies ​17 2 (5):1 371 -8 6 . Sh aradin, N. (2016)"C h e ck ing theNeighb o rh oo d : A Repl ytoDiPa o l o and  Beh r en ds on Pr omotio n ,"  ​ Journal  o f Ethi cs  &Soc ial P h ilos ophy​:  1-8. Sn edega r , J. (2013). " R easons Claims an d Co n tras tiv ism about R easo n s,"​Phi l os oph i cal S tudie s​ ,  1 6 6(2): 231-242. Sned eg ar, J.  (201 4). "Contrast ive Reason s a nd Promo tion , "​ Ethics​, 125(1 ): 39 -63. VASIL PENCHEVWHY A NYTHINGRATHER TH A N  NOTHING ? T HEANS WER O FQUANTUM MECHA N I CS A bs tract:Man y resea rch ers  de ter mi ne the qu estion " Wh yan yt hin g rat h er thanno thi ng ?"to be the mo st an cien tan d  fu ndament a lp h ilos op hi calpro bl em. I t is clo sely re lated tothe idea  o fCreatio n shared by r el igion, sci en ce,  and p h i losophy,  for example in the sha p e of th e " Big B ang" , the doc tri ne offir s t caus e or c ausasu i,t h e Cre a t io n i nsix days i n the  Bibl e,  etc . Thus,  the solution of q u ant um mechanics,  be ings c ie nti f ic ines s enc e ,  can also be in terpretedph i lo sophically ,  an deven re ligious ly. T h is pape r will on ly discus sthep h ilo sophical i nterpret ation. Th e  esse n ce  of t heanswer  o f q uantu m mech a nic s is:  1.) C re ationis ne ce ssary in  a rigorously mathemati cal se nse.Thu s, it doe s n o t n eed any c hoic e, free wi ll,  su bject , G o d, et c.
 Theory_of Reasons,"_​Ergo​ 3 (9): 233-262._Manne, K._(2016)._"Democratizing Humeanism,"_in_​Weighing Reasons​, eds._Errol Lord and_Barry Maguire. Oxford: Oxford_University Press. Rieder,_T.N._(2016). "Why I'm Still a Proportionalist," ​Philosophical Studies 173 (1): 251-270. Scanlon, T. (2015)._​Being_Realistic about_Reasons​._Oxford:_Oxford University Press. Schroeder, M._(2007). ​Slaves of the Passions​._Oxford: Oxford_University Press. Shackel, N. (2014). "Still Waiting for_Plausible_Humean Theory of_Reasons," Philosophical Studies​ 167: 607-633. Sharadin, N. (2015) "Problems_for Pure Probabilism about Promotion (and_a Disjunctive Alternative),"_​Philosophical_Studies_​172 (5): 1371-86. Sharadin,_N. (2016) "Checking the Neighborhood: A_Reply to DiPaolo and Behrends on_Promotion," ​Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy​:_1-8. Snedegar, J. (2013). "Reasons Claims_and Contrastivism about Reasons," ​Philosophical_Studies​, 166(2):_231-242. Snedegar, J. (2014). "Contrastive_Reasons and Promotion,"_​Ethics​, 125(1):_39-63. VASIL PENCHEV_WHY ANYTHING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE_ANSWER OF QUANTUM_MECHANICS Abstract: Many researchers determine the_question_"Why anything rather_than_nothing?"_to be_the most ancient_and_fundamental philosophical_problem._It is closely related to the_idea_of Creation shared by religion, science, and_philosophy, for example in_the_shape of the "Big_Bang", the doctrine of first_cause or causa sui, the Creation_in six_days in_the Bible, etc. Thus, the solution of quantum mechanics, being scientific_in essence, can also be interpreted_philosophically, and even religiously._This paper_will_only discuss the_philosophical_interpretation. The_essence of the answer of quantum mechanics_is: 1.)_Creation is necessary in a rigorously_mathematical sense. Thus, it_does_not need any choice, free will,_subject, God, etc.