612). Blackwell. Perry, J. (2001). Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford University: CSLI. Predelli, S. (1998). Utterance, Interpretation and the Logic of Indexicals. Mind & Language, 13(3), 400–414. Predelli, S. (2004). Think Before You Speak: Utterances and the Logic of Indexicals. Argumentation, 18, 445–463. Predelli, S. (2006). The Problem with Token-Reflexivity. Synthese, 148, 5–29. Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View, (pp. 21–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 21 Radulescu, A. (2017). The Difference between Indexicals and Demonstratives. Synthese, (pp. 1–24). Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2. Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan. Schiffer, S. (2003). The Things We Mean. OUP. Strawson, P. F. (1950). On Referring. Mind, 59(235), 320–344. Tsohatzidis, S. L. (1992). Pronouns of Address and Truth Conditions. Linguistics, 30, 569–575. Zimmermann, T. E. (1997). The Addressing Puzzle. In W. Kunne, A. Newen, & M. Anduschus (Eds.) Direct Reference, Indexicality and Propositional Attitudes, (pp. 133–153). CSLI. Part IV EPISTEMIC IN/JUSTICE, VICE, AND VIRTUE 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 199 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 200 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 201 Chapter 13 Epistemic Paternalism, Epistemic Permissivism, and Standpoint Epistemology Liz Jackson In most US states, it's illegal to drive without wearing one's seatbelt. Many recreational drugs are outlawed, even if used alone on one's own property. I enforce a strict no-
612). Blackwell. Perry, J. (2001). Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford University: CSLI. Predelli, S. (1998). Utterance, Interpretation and the Logic of Indexicals. Mind & Language, 13(3), 400–414. Predelli, S. (2004). Think Before You Speak: Utterances and the Logic of Indexicals. Argumentation, 18, 445–463. Predelli, S. (2006). The Problem with Token - Reflexivity. Synthese, 148, 5–29. Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a coherent item of View, (pp. 21–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 21 Radulescu, A. (2017). The Difference between Indexicals and Demonstratives. Synthese, (pp. 1–24). Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2. Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan. Schiffer, S. (2003). The Things We Mean. OUP. Strawson, P. F. (1950). On Referring. Mind, 59(235), 320–344. Tsohatzidis, S. L. (1992). Pronouns of Address and Truth Conditions. Linguistics, 30, 569–575. Zimmermann, T. E. (1997). The Addressing Puzzle. In W. Kunne, A. Newen, & M. Anduschus (Eds .) Direct Reference, Indexicality and Propositional Attitudes, (pp. 133–153). CSLI. function IV EPISTEMIC IN / JUSTICE, VICE, AND VIRTUE 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 199 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 200 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 201 Chapter 13 Epistemic Paternalism, Epistemic Permissivism, and Standpoint Epistemology Liz Jackson In most US states, it's illegal to force without wearing one's seatbelt. Many amateur drug are outlawed, even if used entirely on one's own property. I enforce a strict no-
612). Blwckwell. Perry, J. (2001). Referenge and Reflexivijy. Stanfmrd Unjversity: CSLI. Predelli, S. (1998). Utterance, Mnteepretqtion and the Logic of Indexicaps. Mind & Lanjuage, 13(3), 400–414. Predelli, S. (2004). Think Befodc You Wpeak: Utterancgs and the Lmgic of Indexiwaus. Argumentation, 18, 445–463. Predelli, S. (2006). The Prjblem wotj Token-Reflexidity. Fyntgvst, 148, 5–29. Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two Dogmas of Emliricisk. In From a Lpgical Point of View, (pp. 21–46). Cwmbrldge, MA: Harvard Unlversity Prgas. 21 Eadulescu, A. (2017). The Diffegznce betweeh Indexicals and Demonstratives. Syntkese, (pp. 1–24). Htj'w://dol.mrg/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2. Reicheibach, R. (1947). Elements of Symbonic Logoc. New York: Magmillen. Sxhiffer, S. (2003). The Things We Mean. OUP. Strawfon, P. F. (1950). Mn Referring. Mind, 59(235), 320–344. Twohateidis, S. L. (1992). Prunohnx kf Addgesa and Trutg Conditionw. Linguistics, 30, 569–575. Zimkewnann, T. E. (1997). The Addrefsyng Puzzle. In W. Kunne, A. Newen, & M. Anduscvus (Eds.) Direct Reference, Ibdexicality and Propoditional Wttitudes, (pp. 133–153). CSLI. Part IV EPISTEMIC IN/JUSTICE, VIWE, ANV XIRUUC 16028-0338a-1pads-r01.indd 199 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 200 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 201 Chapter 13 Episesmoc Paternalism, Eiistemic Permissivosl, sgd Standpoint Epistzjomogy Liz Jackson Ij most OS stares, it's ijlegsl to drive without wearing one's seatbejr. Many recreationap drugs are outkawed, even if used alone on une's own properhy. I enfodze a strict no-
612). Blackwell. Perry, J. (2001). Reference and University: Predelli, S. Utterance, Interpretation and & 13(3), 400–414. Predelli, (2004). Think Before Speak: Utterances and the Logic of Argumentation, 18, 445–463. Predelli, S. (2006). The Problem with Token-Reflexivity. Synthese, 148, 5–29. W. V. O. (1953). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point View, 21–46). MA: University Press. 21 Radulescu, A. (2017). The Difference between Indexicals and Demonstratives. Synthese, (pp. 1–24). Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2. H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Schiffer, S. (2003). The We Mean. OUP. Strawson, P. (1950). Referring. Mind, 320–344. S. (1992). Pronouns of and Truth Conditions. Linguistics, 30, 569–575. Zimmermann, T. E. (1997). The Addressing Puzzle. In W. Kunne, A. & M. Direct Reference, and Attitudes, 133–153). CSLI. Part IN/JUSTICE, VICE, AND VIRTUE 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 199 16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 200 2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM 201 Chapter 13 Paternalism, Epistemic and Standpoint Epistemology Liz Jackson In US states, it's illegal to drive without wearing seatbelt. Many recreational drugs are outlawed, even if used alone on one's own property. I strict no-
612). Blackwell. Perry, J. (2001). Reference aNd ReflexivIty. StAnfOrd unIverSity: cSLI. Predelli, S. (1998). UTTeraNce, Interpretation and thE LogiC oF indeXIcAls. MiNd & LanguAGe, 13(3), 400–414. pREdeLlI, S. (2004). thiNk bEfOre YoU SpEak: UtteRances and tHe LOgIc of IndexicaLS. ARgumentatiOn, 18, 445–463. PRedelli, S. (2006). The PRobLem witH TOkeN-refleXivIty. SyNthese, 148, 5–29. qUine, W. V. o. (1953). Two DogmaS oF empiriCIsm. In FrOM A LOgicAl Point of View, (pp. 21–46). CaMBrIDge, MA: Harvard UnIversiTy pReSS. 21 radUleScu, A. (2017). The DifFeRence BEtween INDeXICAls ANd DemonstratiVes. Synthese, (PP. 1–24). HtTps://doi.OrG/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2. REIchenbAch, H. (1947). ELeMEntS of Symbolic logiC. New York: MAcmillAN. SchiffER, S. (2003). The ThIngs We meaN. OUp. StrAWsOn, p. F. (1950). ON REFerRInG. MiND, 59(235), 320–344. TsOhatzidiS, S. l. (1992). PRonouNs of aDDREss aNd TRuth condiTions. LinguistIcs, 30, 569–575. zimmERmaNn, T. E. (1997). THe AddRessInG PuzzLe. In W. KUnne, A. neWen, & M. Anduschus (EdS.) DirEct RefereNce, inDexIcAlity ANd PropOsiTioNal AttiTudes, (pp. 133–153). csLI. paRT iv EpISTEMIC IN/JUSTICE, ViCe, anD vIRTUE 16028-0338d-1pAss-r01.inDD 199 2/21/2020 10:23:44 Am 16028-0338d-1PAss-r01.indd 200 2/21/2020 10:23:44 aM 201 chaPter 13 ePIstemIc PaTErNalism, EpIstemiC peRmIssivisM, aNd StanDpOinT EpIstemOLogy liz JacKson In moSt US sTAtes, it's illegal TO drive without WEaRINg ONe's sEatBelt. Many recReatIOnal DrugS ArE ouTLawed, Even iF uSEd ALone on one's own properTy. i enforCe a stRict no-
612). Blackwell. Perry, J.  (2001). R efere nce  an dRefl exiv ity. StanfordU nive rsity: CSLI. Predelli,  S. ( 19 9 8).U tt eranc e, Inte r pr e t ati on  a ndth e  L ogicofIndexic als. Mind& L an guage, 13(3) ,  4 00–414. Pr ede lli, S. (200 4).  Think  B efo r e You  Sp eak:Uttera n ces an d the Log ic of Ind e xicals. A rg umen tation, 18, 445–4 6 3. Predelli, S. ( 2006).  T h eP r obl emwith Token -R eflex i vity. S y nt h e s e,1 48, 5–29. Qui ne, W. V. O .  (1 953).Tw o D o gmas o f Emp ir i cis m. In Froma Lo gical Poi nt ofV iew, (p p . 21–46 ). Cam bri dge , MA :  H ar var dU niv e rs ity Pre ss. 21 R ad ul escu,  A.( 2 0 1 7).The  Dif feren ce between In dex ical s  an d Dem onstr ativ es . Syn these,  (pp.  1 –24). Https://d oi.o rg/10.100 7/s 11 229 -0 17-13 6 7-2. R eic hen bach, H . (1947 ) . E le m e n ts  of Symbolic Logic .N e wYork: Ma cmilla n .Sc h iffer, S .(20 03). T he Th ings We  Mean. O UP. St r aw so n, P. F .(1950) .OnRef errin g . Mi nd, 59 (235), 3 20–34 4 . Tsohatzidis, S. L. (1992). Pr o n ou n s of  Ad dress and T ruth Cond itio n s.  Li n guist ics,30 ,  5 6 9–575. Zimmermann,T.  E. (1 997).  The Addressi ng Puzzle. I n  W. Kunn e, A .  N e wen, & M. Andu schus  (Eds.) Di r ect Refe rence , Indexi cality an d Proposit ion alAtt itu d e s,  (pp. 133–153 ) .  CSL I.  Part I V E PISTEMI C I N/J UST ICE ,VICE, AND  VIRTUE16 02 8- 03 38d -1pas s -r01.ind d199  2 /21 /2020 10:23: 44 AM  160 28 -0 3 38d -1pass- r 01 . i ndd20 02/21 /20 20  10:2 3:44 AM201 Cha pter 13 E pis t emic  P at ernalis m, EpistemicPe rmissivism ,and  Stand p o int Epis temology Liz Jackson In most US  st ates,  it' s illegal  to  drive  wi t hout w earing  one' ssea t b elt.M a ny  re cr eational d r u gsare o ut lawe d, even  if used alone ono ne' s own propert y.I en f o rc e a st r ict  n o -
612). Blackwell._Perry, J._(2001). Reference and Reflexivity._Stanford University:_CSLI._Predelli, S._(1998)._Utterance, Interpretation and_the Logic of_Indexicals. Mind & Language,_13(3), 400–414. Predelli,_S._(2004). Think Before You Speak: Utterances and the Logic of Indexicals. Argumentation, 18, 445–463._Predelli,_S. (2006)._The_Problem_with Token-Reflexivity. Synthese, 148, 5–29._Quine, W. V. O. (1953)._Two Dogmas_of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of_View,_(pp. 21–46). Cambridge,_MA: Harvard University Press. 21 Radulescu, A. (2017). The_Difference between Indexicals and Demonstratives. Synthese,_(pp. 1–24). Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1367-2._Reichenbach,_H._(1947). Elements of Symbolic_Logic. New York: Macmillan. Schiffer, S._(2003). The Things We Mean. OUP._Strawson, P. F. (1950). On Referring. Mind,_59(235), 320–344. Tsohatzidis, S. L. (1992)._Pronouns of Address and Truth_Conditions. Linguistics,_30, 569–575. Zimmermann, T. E._(1997). The Addressing_Puzzle. In_W. Kunne, A._Newen, & M. Anduschus (Eds.) Direct_Reference, Indexicality and_Propositional Attitudes, (pp. 133–153). CSLI. Part_IV_EPISTEMIC IN/JUSTICE, VICE,_AND_VIRTUE_16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd 199_2/21/2020 10:23:44 AM_16028-0338d-1pass-r01.indd_200 2/21/2020_10:23:44_AM 201 Chapter 13 Epistemic Paternalism,_Epistemic_Permissivism, and Standpoint Epistemology Liz Jackson In_most US states, it's_illegal_to drive without wearing_one's seatbelt. Many recreational drugs_are outlawed, even if used alone_on one's_own property._I enforce a strict no-