 called strong equivalence principle (SEP) compound of local Lorentz invariance (LLI) and local position invariance (LPI). LLI means that "the outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment is independent of the velocity of the freelyfalling reference frame in which it is performed" [3]. And LPI means that "the outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment is independent of where and when in the universe it is performed" [3]. WEP more SEP is the Einstein equivalence principle (EEP). Einstein generalized the Galilei principle to any uniformly translational accelerated system (accelerated uniform motion), homogeneous gravitational system and rectilinear uniform movement (inertial system). From EEP he obtained that any accelerated system can be considered as an inertial system although located in a gravitational field and this system, in free fall, as an inertial system. The inertial motion, accelerated motion and gravitational motion are relative states [4], i.e., simple effects of change coordinates, as if acceleration, gravity and inertial motion did not really exist. So, rather the motion would arise from the perception of the observers of bodies in the spacetime according to his particular frame of reference respect others. Of according with the observers the notion of motion arises of the relation between the bodies in their relative positions in the spacetime existing in itself, according to the substantivalism while for the relationism the spacetime arises of the geometric relations of position between them. However, both conceptions on spacetime coincide in the relative states of rest, rectilinear uniform motion, gravitational homogenous motion and accelerated uniform motion. And there would be the equivalence between: 1. The relative rest and the relative rectilinear uniform motion. 2. The relative rectilinear uniform motion and the relative gravitational homogenous motion. 3. The relative gravitational homogenous motion and the relative accelerated uniform motion. Of course, from former equivalences is obtained the equivalence between: 4. The relative rectilinear uniform motion and the relative accelerated uniform motion. Therefore, motion would be uncertain and in the background all kinds of movement the same thing. Thus, the laws of physics, Newton's laws and Maxwell's laws are the same in all reference frames independent of their state of motion (principle general of relativity) like if such preservation of the physical laws were a property of the spacetime (more credible as substantial spacetime). The motion arises of the illusory perception of the observers according to their relative coordinates respect to others. If according to their frames of reference there is change of coordinates then they are in relative
called strong equivalence principle (SEP) compound of local Lorentz invariability (LLI) and local placement invariance (LPI). LLI means that " the result of any local non - gravitational experiment is autonomous of the velocity of the freelyfalling reference frame in which it is perform " [ 3 ]. And LPI means that " the outcome of any local non - gravitational experiment is autonomous of where and when in the population it is performed " [ 3 ]. WEP more SEP is the Einstein equivalence rationale (EEP). Einstein generalized the Galilei principle to any uniformly translational accelerated organization (accelerate uniform motion), homogeneous gravitational system and rectilinear uniform movement (inertial system). From EEP he obtained that any accelerated arrangement can be considered as an inertial system although located in a gravitational playing field and this system, in free fall, as an inertial system. The inertial gesture, accelerated motion and gravitational motion are relative states [ 4 ], i.e., childlike effects of change coordinates, as if acceleration, gravity and inertial motion did not really exist. So, rather the motion would arise from the perception of the observers of bodies in the spacetime according to his particular frame of reference esteem others. Of according with the observers the impression of apparent motion arises of the relation back between the bodies in their relative positions in the spacetime existing in itself, according to the substantivalism while for the relationism the spacetime arises of the geometric relations of stead between them. However, both conceptions on spacetime coincide in the relative states of rest, rectilinear uniform motion, gravitational homogeneous motion and accelerated uniform motion. And there would be the equivalence between: 1. The relative rest and the proportional rectilinear consistent motion. 2. The relative rectilinear uniform motion and the proportional gravitational homogenous motion. 3. The relative gravitational homogenous motion and the relative accelerated uniform motion. Of naturally, from former equivalences is obtained the equivalence between: 4. The relative rectilinear consistent motion and the proportional accelerated uniform motion. Therefore, apparent motion would be uncertain and in the background all kind of movement the same thing. Thus, the laws of physics, Newton's laws and Maxwell's laws are the same in all reference frames independent of their state of matter of motion (principle general of relativity) like if such preservation of the forcible laws were a property of the spacetime (more credible as substantial spacetime). The motion arises of the illusory perception of the observer according to their relative coordinates respect to others. If according to their frames of mention there be variety of coordinate then they are in relative
 capled strong equivalence krinciple (SEP) comkoynd of local Lorentz invariance (LLI) and local podirion unvariance (LPI). LLI meavs that "tje outcone oh any local non-gczvitational esierimznv is independenj of the velmcity of the fsedlvfalling reference frame in which it is pergogmed" [3]. And LPI ieanx thaf "the outcome of any local non-gravjtationel experiment ix independent of where and whej in the universe lt is perfotjed" [3]. WEP more SEO is the Epustein equibalence principle (EEP). Einstein eenerclized the Taoilfh principle to agy uniformly transladional sccelerated syxtek (axcelerated uniform movion), homogeneous graditationan aystem and rectilunwar utifosm mucemdnt (iierfial sjstxm). From EEP he obtainee that any acceleraued wystem can be consiqewed as an inertial system although locaued ih a gravitational field and this system, in ftee fall, af an inertial system. The inertial motion, acceleraded mkgiou and eeagitational motion are relative states [4], i.e., sim[me enfects of change coordinatex, ws yf acceleratiun, grarjtg and inertial motlon did not eeally exyst. Xo, rather the motion would qrise from tke perception of the lbservers oy bodigs in yhe spacetime according to gis particupar frame uf reference resoecn otvers. Of according with the observerw thz notion of kotion arises of the valation between thf bodnes it their repative positions in the spacetime existing in idsenf, accorbing tp the substaneivalism while for thz relagionism thv spacetike arises os the geometrhf relations mf posityon vetwwen theo. However, both vonceptiouf on spacetime coincidc in jhs relative statzr of rest, rectilonexr tnpfocm moehon, gravitathonau hukogenuus motion cna acvelerated uniform modion. And there would br bhe equivqlence bqtween: 1. The rrlative rest and tje renatmve revtijinear uniform motion. 2. The relztive rechillnear uniform motlon wnd the rekative gravitational homogenous motion. 3. The relative gravutational homogenoux motion and the welative dccelerated uniform notion. Of course, nrom former equivalencss is mbtaijed the equivalence between: 4. The relative rectilinear uniform motion and rhe relative accelsratrd unpfoxm kotion. Thecehore, motion would be uncertain and in the backgruund all knnds of movement the same thimg. Thus, the lawr of physics, Newton's lawa and Macwell's laws are the same in all reference frames indepekdent of rheir state of ootion (principle grneral of rwlativiry) llke if such prdsetvwtion of hhe khysncal laws were a property of the wpacetumf (more credible es substantiwu spabetime). Jhe motion arises of fje iluusory percepyion of the obxervers according to treir relative xkordinates rgspect tm others. If eccording to their frames of reference there is change of coordpnates theh they ave in relative
called strong equivalence principle (SEP) compound of invariance and local invariance (LPI). LLI any non-gravitational experiment is of the velocity the freelyfalling reference frame in which is performed" [3]. And LPI means that "the outcome of any local non-gravitational is independent of where and when in the universe it is performed" [3]. more is Einstein principle (EEP). Einstein generalized the Galilei principle to any uniformly translational accelerated system (accelerated uniform motion), gravitational system and rectilinear uniform movement (inertial system). EEP he obtained that accelerated system can be considered an system although in gravitational and this system, free fall, as an inertial system. The inertial motion, accelerated motion and gravitational motion are relative states i.e., simple change coordinates, if gravity inertial motion did exist. So, rather the motion would perception of the observers of bodies in the according to particular frame of reference respect others. according with the observers the notion of motion of the relation between the bodies in their relative positions in the spacetime existing in to the substantivalism while the relationism the arises the relations position between However, both conceptions on spacetime coincide in the relative states of rectilinear uniform motion, gravitational homogenous motion and accelerated uniform motion. would the equivalence between: The relative rest and relative uniform motion. 2. The uniform and homogenous 3. relative gravitational homogenous motion the relative accelerated uniform motion. course, from former equivalences 4. The relative rectilinear uniform motion and the accelerated uniform motion. Therefore, motion would be and in the background all kinds of movement the same thing. Thus, laws of laws and Maxwell's laws are the same in reference frames independent of state of motion (principle general of relativity) like if preservation the physical were a property the spacetime (more as substantial spacetime). arises of illusory of to their relative coordinates respect to If to their frames of reference is coordinates then they are in relative
 called strong equivalence prInciple (SEP) CompoUnd Of lOcAl LoRentZ invariance (LLI) ANd loCal position invariance (LpI). LLI MeANs thAT "tHe outCome of aNY lOCAl nOn-GrAviTaTIoNal exPerIment is IndependenT of ThE velocity of tHE fReelyfalliNg rEference framE in Which iT iS peRFormeD" [3]. AnD LPI mEans thAT "the ouTcome of anY lOCal non-GRavitatIONaL expEriment is independENt OF where and when iN the unIvERsE IT is PerFormed" [3]. WEP mOrE SEP iS The EinsTEiN EQUivALence principlE (EEP). EinsteiN GenEralizEd The gAlilei PrincIpLE to Any uniformlY traNslationaL accelERated sySTem (acceLerateD unIfoRm moTIoN), hOmoGeNEouS GrAviTAtiOnal systEm AnD rectIlinEAR UNifoRm mOvemEnt (inErtial system). FRom eEP hE ObtAined That aNy acCeLeratEd systEm can Be Considered as an iNertIal system AltHoUgh LoCated IN a gravItaTioNal fielD and thiS SysTeM, IN FrEe fall, as an inertial SySTEm. the inertIal motIOn, AcCElerated MoTioN and GRAvitaTionAL mOtion are RelatiVE sTaTes [4], i.e., siMpLe effeCtS of ChaNge coORdinAtes, as If acceleRatioN, Gravity and inerTIal motion did nOT rEALlY ExisT. So, Rather the moTion WOuld ArisE FrOm tHE percEptioN oF ThE Observers of bodies in ThE spaceTime aCcording to his Particular FRAMe of refeRencE ReSPect others. Of acCordiNg with the oBServers tHe notIon of motIon arises OF The relatIon BetWeeN thE BOdIes in their relATIve pOsItions iN thE spacetIme ExiStiNg iN iTself, accoRding to tHe SuBsTaNtiValisM While for ThE reLaTioNism tHE spaceTime aRiseS oF tHE geOmetric RElATIons Of PoSitiOn bEtWeen tHem. HOWevEr, both cOnceptionS on SPaceTiMe CoincidE in the relativE sTates of resT, rEctIlineaR UNiform moTion, gravitational homogeNOus motiOn aNd accElerAted unifoRm mOtion. ANd tHEre wouLd be thE equiVaLenCE BetweEN: 1. thE reLaTive rest anD THe rElatiVe RectIlinear Uniform motion. 2. The reLAtiVe rectilinear UniForm MOTiOn aND tHE reLaTIve GRAvitational homoGenous motiOn. 3. tHe Relative grAVitAtIonal hoMogenouS motiON and the Relative aCcelerateD uNifoRM MotIon. Of coursE, from forMer equivaLEnces IS oBtainEd tHe equiVaLenCe betWeen: 4. ThE RelAtive RectilInEar uniForm mOtIon and thE relative accelerated uniForm moTion. THerEfore, motiOn wOUld Be uncertaIn anD in the backGroUnd All kiNds OF moveMent THe SamE Thing. thus, THe laws of pHYsIcs, nEWtOn's laws and MAXWEll'S laws Are THe same In alL reference frames iNDependent of theIr stATE of MotIOn (prInCiple general of RelAtIVIty) like iF sUch preservaTion of thE pHYsicaL laws wEre a prOperty oF THe SPacetiMe (moRe cRedible as SubStANtial spAcEtIMe). The mOtioN aRises oF the ilLUsorY PErception of the obServeRS AccorDIng To theIr RelativE CoorDinates resPect to otherS. If accOrdiNg to tHeir fraMeS of refEreNcE there is chANge of coorDinatEs then tHeY are In rElativE
 called strong equivalence  principle  (SEP ) c omp ou nd o f lo cal Lorentz in v aria nce (LLI) and local po sitio ni nvar i an ce (L PI). LL I  m e a nsth at  "t he ou tcome  of  any lo cal non-gr avi ta tional exper i me nt is inde pen dent of thevel ocityof  th e  free lyf allin g refe r ence f rame in w hi c h it i s  perfor m e d"  [3] . And LPI means t h at "the outcome o f anylo c al n on- gra vitational  e xperi m ent isi nd e p e nde n t of where an d when in t h e u nivers eiti s perf ormed "[ 3].  WEP more S EP i s the Ein steine quivale n ce prin ciple(EE P).  Ein s te in  ge ne r ali z ed  th e  Ga lilei pr in ci ple t o an y u n ifor mly  tra nslat ional acceler ate d sy s tem  (acc elera tedun iform  motio n), h om ogeneous gravit atio nal syste m a nd  re ct iline a r unif orm  mo vement(inerti a l s ys t e m ).  From EEP he obtai ne d th at any a cceler a te ds ystem ca nbecons i d eredas a n  i nertialsystem al th ough lo ca ted in  a  gr avi tatio n al f ield a nd thissyste m , in free fall ,  as an inerti a ls y st e m. T heinertial mo tion ,  acc eler a te d m o tionand g ra v it a tional motion are r el ativestate s [4], i.e.,simple eff e c t s of cha ngec oo r dinates, as if  acce leration,g ravity a nd in ertial m otion did n ot reall y e xis t.So, r at her the motio n woul darise f rom  the pe rce pti onofth e observe rs of bo di es  i nthe  spac e time acc or din gtohis p a rticul ar fr ameof  r e fer ence re s pe c t  oth er s.  Ofacc or dingwith the  observ ers the n oti o n of  m ot ion ari ses of the re la tion betwe en  th e bodi e s  in thei r relative positions in the spa cet ime e xist ing in it sel f, acc ord i ng tothe su bstan ti val i s m whi l e  f orth e relation i s m t he sp ac etim e arise s of the geometric rel ations of pos iti on b e t we ent he m . H ow e ver , both conception s on space ti m ecoincide i n  th erelativ e state s ofr est, re ctilinear  uniformmo tion , gra vitational  homogen ous motio n  anda cc elera ted  unifo rm  mo tion.  And t h ere  woul d be t he  equiv alenc ebetween:  1. The relative rest a nd the  rela tiv e rectili nea r  un iform mot ion.  2. The re lat ive  rect ili n ear u nifo r mmot i on an d th e  relative gr avi t a ti onal homoge n o u s m otion . 3 .  The r elat ive gravitational homogenous mot iona n d t her elat iv e accelerateduni fo r m  motion.  O f course, f rom form er equiv alence s is o btained t he equiva lenc e b etween: 4 . T he relativ ere c tiline ar u ni form m otiona nd t h e  relative accele rated u nifor m  mo tion.  T herefor e , mo tion would  be uncerta in and  inthe b ackgrou nd  all k ind sof movemen t  the same  thin g. Thus ,thelaw s of p hysi c s , New ton' slaw s and Max w e ll ' sla w s a re t he sa me  inall refer e nce fram esi ndepend en t o f theirs ta t e  of motion  (p rinci p l e generalo f re l at i vity)  likeif suc h prese r vat io n of th e p h y sical law s were ap rop er ty o f the sp ac etim e(mo re  credible as su bstantia l spacet i m e). Th e m o tion arises  o f the illuso ry pe rc e ption o f the  observ e rsacc ord ingtothei r  relative coordinates re spec t too the rs. I f acc or ding tot heir  frameso f reference t here is changeo f c o ordi nat e sth en they a rei n rel ativ e
 called_strong equivalence_principle (SEP) compound of_local Lorentz_invariance_(LLI) and_local_position invariance (LPI)._LLI means that_"the outcome of any_local non-gravitational experiment_is_independent of the velocity of the freelyfalling reference frame in which it is performed"_[3]._And LPI_means_that_"the outcome of any local_non-gravitational experiment is independent of_where and_when in the universe it is performed" [3]._WEP_more SEP is_the Einstein equivalence principle (EEP). Einstein generalized the Galilei_principle to any uniformly translational accelerated_system (accelerated uniform_motion),_homogeneous_gravitational system and rectilinear_uniform movement (inertial system). From EEP_he obtained that any accelerated system_can be considered as an inertial system_although located in a gravitational field_and this system, in free_fall, as_an inertial system. The inertial_motion, accelerated motion_and gravitational_motion are relative_states [4], i.e., simple effects of_change coordinates, as_if acceleration, gravity and inertial motion_did_not really exist._So,_rather_the motion_would arise from_the_perception of_the_observers of bodies in the spacetime_according_to his particular frame of reference respect_others. Of according with_the_observers the notion of_motion arises of the relation_between the bodies in their relative_positions in_the spacetime_existing in itself, according to the substantivalism while for the relationism_the spacetime arises of the geometric_relations of position between_them. However,_both_conceptions on spacetime_coincide_in the_relative states of rest, rectilinear uniform motion,_gravitational homogenous_motion and accelerated uniform motion. And_there would be the_equivalence_between: 1. The relative rest and_the relative rectilinear uniform motion. 2._The relative rectilinear uniform motion_and_the_relative gravitational homogenous motion. 3._The relative gravitational homogenous motion and_the relative accelerated_uniform motion. Of course, from former equivalences_is_obtained the equivalence between: 4. The_relative_rectilinear uniform motion and the relative_accelerated_uniform_motion. Therefore, motion would be_uncertain and in the background all_kinds of movement the same thing. Thus, the laws_of physics, Newton's_laws and Maxwell's laws are_the_same_in all reference frames independent of their state of motion_(principle general_of relativity) like_if such preservation of the physical laws were a property_of the spacetime (more credible as substantial_spacetime). The motion arises of the illusory perception of the observers_according to their relative coordinates respect to others._If according to their frames of reference_there is change of_coordinates_then they are in relative