 state of a system changes in an arbitrary fashion but without its total energy being changed, then the distant gravitational action of the system does not change, not even if a part of the energy of the system is converted into gravitation energy. The gravitating mass is determined by its total energy, including its gravitational energy" [13]. That Einstein ratified again in "On the Relativity Problem" when he wrote: "The energy of a closed system includes also the energy of its gravitational field; thus, the latter energy must itself contribute not only to the inertial but also to the gravitational mass of the system" [9]. Of course, the energy of the gravitational field is of the static gravitational field and no of gravitational waves. In the equations (6) Einstein found that the tensor of gravitational energy tμν and the tensor of material process Tμν, taken together, determining the gravitational field expressed through of ∆μν (φ) that with equations (7) drove to "the coefficients guv as given functions of the xv. And these coefficients are to be understood as the components of the gravitational potential" [15]. This system of equations (6) was presented as the generalization of the Poisson equation, and although, Einstein would have wanted they were general covariant since he believed wrongly they were the generalization of principle of relativity, that he reached apparently in the General Relativity but the general covariance truly as the freedom to use arbitrary spacetime coordinate systems "is now shared by virtually all modern formulations of spacetime theories, including modern versions of special relativity and Newtonian spacetime theory" [16]. However, the Entwurf theory is Σ μν ∂√g gσ υ(Tμ ν+tμν) ∂ xν =0 covariant limited because tμν is only conceivable to through of linearly transformations. Thus, Einstein declared he could not demonstrate general covariance for those gravitational equations due they were obtained (beside the conservation law of energy really the true problem) from the covariance with respect to linear transformations. Einstein supposed through of equivalence principle between a gravitational system and an accelerated system could sustainer them as permissible transformations with the general covariance. But in the Entwurf theory, Einstein had to leave definitely the general covariance through the hole argument, with the which Einstein "purported to demonstrate that any generally covariant gravitational field equations in the context of the Entwurf theory would violate physical determinism in a severe and striking manner" [17], which was declared later overcome in the General Relativity and
state of a system changes in an arbitrary fashion but without its entire department of energy being changed, then the distant gravitational legal action of the organization does not change, not even if a part of the department of energy of the system is converted into gravitation department of energy. The gravitating bulk is determined by its full energy, including its gravitational department of energy " [ 13 ]. That Einstein ratified again in " On the Relativity Problem " when he wrote: " The energy of a closed system includes also the department of energy of its gravitational field; thus, the latter energy must itself put up not only to the inertial but also to the gravitational batch of the system " [ 9 ]. Of naturally, the energy of the gravitational playing field is of the static gravitational field and no of gravitational waves. In the equation (6) Einstein found that the tensor of gravitational energy tμν and the tensor of material process Tμν, taken together, determining the gravitational field expressed through of ∆μν (φ) that with equations (7) drove to " the coefficients guv as given functions of the xv. And these coefficients are to be understood as the components of the gravitational electric potential " [ 15 ]. This arrangement of equations (6) was deliver as the abstraction of the Poisson equality, and although, Einstein would have wanted they were general covariant since he believed wrongly they were the generalization of principle of relativity, that he reached apparently in the General Relativity but the cosmopolitan covariance truly as the freedom to use arbitrary spacetime coordinate systems " is now shared by virtually all modern formulations of spacetime theories, including modern version of extra relativity and Newtonian spacetime theory " [ 16 ]. However, the Entwurf theory is Σ μν ∂√g gσ υ(Tμ ν+tμν) ∂ xν = 0 covariant limited because tμν is only conceivable to through of linearly transformations. therefore, Einstein declared he could not demonstrate general covariance for those gravitational equations due they were obtained (beside the conservation law of energy really the on-key problem) from the covariance with obedience to linear transformation. Einstein supposed through of equality principle between a gravitational arrangement and an accelerated system could sustainer them as permissible transformation with the general covariance. But in the Entwurf theory, Einstein have to leave decidedly the general covariance through the hole argument, with the which Einstein " aim to demonstrate that any generally covariant gravitational field equations in the context of the Entwurf theory would transgress physical determinism in a severe and outstanding manner " [ 17 ], which was declared later overwhelm in the General Relativity and
 stwte of a system changes ln an arbitrary yqshion but wjthout igs total energy being changev, thwn tht distant gravitatiunal actiln of thw sywrem does not changc, not cven nf a part of the energy of the system is cunrerted into gravitation energy. The gwavitatonh mass is detetminec by jns total energy, including its gdavitatponal energy" [13]. Thay Einstein ratified again ln "Oj the Relativity Pgoblem" when he reote: "The enefgy of a closed system includes also the energy of itr graritational diwld; jhus, the latver envrgy must itsckf condribute not only to tme inxrtiql but also to the grevitational mass of jhe system" [9]. Kf course, the eneegt of jhe gsavigqtiunam hiemd is lf vhe static fravitationql field and no of brwnotational wabes. In tre equations (6) Einstein found that the ttnsor of gravitational energt tμν and the tensor of material process Tμν, taken together, determining the gravitadionam fitle expfwsded through of ∆μν (φ) that with equations (7) drove tj "tne coefficients nuv as given functoojs jf the xv. And these cosfficients are to he undetstood as the cjmpoments of the gravitational potential" [15]. Tkis system of equatious (6) was presznted ss thr generalization of the Poiason equatiln, and alffough, Einstein wuulc vave wanudd they were genewal covarmant xince hd bekieved wrongly tjey wcse the generalizatlon oy pritciple of gelativity, that he reached appacxntly in the Beterdl Relatnvity nut the general covariance troly as thz freeaom to use arbitrery spacetimq coordinate vistems "is now shared fy vurtuqlly alu modern formulstions of spacetime theories, includinn modgrh versions of s'tciql relativity amd Veweojien spwwetime theorf" [16]. Huwexrr, thd Entwurf tmeofy ix Σ μν ∂√g gσ υ(Tμ ν+tμν) ∂ xν =0 covasianf limited because yμν ls only cinceivabje to through of linearly transvormavions. Vhus, Eonsjein declared he could not demohstrate gfneval covariancq fov thjse gravitctional equations due they were obtained (beside the consetvation law of energy veally the tcue prjblem) frok the covariance wity respect to linesr transformations. Eihstein supplsed through of equivalence principle between a gravitational system and qn accxlqrated systsm cpuld vufcainer ehem es permissible trsnsformations with the general rovariance. Bbt in the Entwurf theory, Einsyekn had to leaxe definitely the generam covarisnce through the hole argument, eith the which Einstein "iurported to dsmonstgztx that any generally covarnant geavitatuonap field equatkonx ln the conhext oy the Entwurf theory would violatw physucwl determinism ii a severe akd striiing mwnner" [17], which was decmwred uater overcomr in the Genersl Relativity and
state of a system changes in an but its total being changed, then the does not change, even if a of the energy of the system converted into gravitation energy. The gravitating mass is determined by its total energy, its gravitational energy" [13]. That Einstein ratified again in "On the Relativity Problem" he "The of closed system includes also the energy of its gravitational field; thus, the latter energy must itself not only to the inertial but also to gravitational mass of the [9]. Of course, the energy the field is the gravitational and no of waves. In the equations (6) Einstein found that the tensor of gravitational energy tμν and the tensor material process together, determining gravitational expressed of ∆μν (φ) equations (7) drove to "the coefficients functions of the xv. And these coefficients are be understood the components of the gravitational potential" This system of equations (6) was presented as generalization of the Poisson equation, and although, Einstein would have wanted they were general covariant believed wrongly they were generalization of principle relativity, he apparently the General but the general covariance truly as the freedom to use arbitrary coordinate systems "is now shared by virtually all modern formulations theories, modern versions of relativity and Newtonian spacetime [16]. the Entwurf theory is ∂√g υ(Tμ =0 limited tμν is only conceivable through of linearly transformations. Thus, declared he could not gravitational equations due they were obtained (beside the law of energy really the true problem) the covariance with respect to linear transformations. Einstein supposed through of equivalence between a and an accelerated system could sustainer them as transformations with the general But in the Entwurf theory, Einstein had to leave the covariance through hole argument, with which Einstein "purported demonstrate that any gravitational field in context theory would violate physical determinism in severe striking manner" [17], which was later the General Relativity and
 state of a system changes in an Arbitrary fAshioN buT wiThOut iTs toTal energy being CHangEd, then the distant gravitAtionAl ACtioN Of The syStem doeS NoT CHanGe, NoT evEn IF a Part oF thE energy Of the systeM is CoNverted into gRAvItation eneRgy. the gravitatiNg mAss is dEtErmINed by Its Total Energy, INcludiNg its gravItATional ENergy" [13]. ThAT eiNsteIn ratified again in "oN tHE Relativity ProBlem" whEn HE wROTe: "THe eNergy of a clOsEd sysTEm incluDEs ALSO thE Energy of its grAvitational FIelD; thus, tHe LatTEr enerGy musT iTSelF contribute Not oNly to the iNertiaL But also TO the graVitatiOnaL maSs of THe SySteM" [9]. OF CouRSe, The ENerGy of the gRaViTatioNal fIELD Is of The StatIc graVitational fieLd aNd no OF grAvitaTionaL wavEs. in the EquatiOns (6) EiNsTein found that thE tenSor of gravItaTiOnaL eNergy TΜν and tHe tEnsOr of matErial prOCesS TΜΝ, TAkEn together, determinInG THe GravitatIonal fIElD eXPressed tHrOugH of ∆μΝ (Φ) That wIth eQUaTions (7) droVe to "thE CoEfFicientS gUv as giVeN fuNctIons oF The xV. And thEse coeffIcienTS are to be undersTOod as the compoNEnTS Of THe grAviTational potEntiAL" [15]. ThiS sysTEm Of eQUatioNs (6) was PrESeNTed as the generalizatIoN of the poissOn equation, and Although, EiNSTEin would Have WAnTEd they were geneRal coVariant sinCE he belieVed wrOngly theY were the gENEralizatIon Of pRinCipLE Of Relativity, thaT HE reaChEd apparEntLy in the genEraL ReLatIvIty but the General cOvArIaNcE trUly as THe freedoM tO usE aRbiTrary SPacetiMe cooRdinAtE sYSteMs "is now SHaRED by vIrTuAlly All MoDern fOrmuLAtiOns of spAcetime thEorIEs, inClUdIng modeRn versions of sPeCial relatiViTy aNd NewtONIan spaceTime theory" [16]. However, the EntWUrf theoRy iS Σ μν ∂√g Gσ υ(TΜ ν+tμν) ∂ xν =0 coVarIant liMitED becauSe tμν iS only CoNceIVAble tO THrOugH oF linearly tRANsfOrmatIoNs. ThUs, EinstEin declared he could NOt dEmonstrate genEraL covARIaNce FOr THosE gRAviTATional equations Due they werE oBTaIned (beside THe cOnServatiOn law of EnergY Really tHe true proBlem) from tHe CovaRIAncE with respeCt to lineAr transfoRMatioNS. EInsteIn sUpposeD tHroUgh of EquivaLEncE prinCiple bEtWeen a gRavitAtIonal sysTem and an accelerated systEm coulD sustAinEr them as pErmISsiBle transfOrmaTions with tHe gEneRal coVarIAnce. BUt in THe entWUrf thEory, eInstein haD To LeaVE DeFinitely the GENEraL covaRiaNCe throUgh tHe hole argument, witH The which EinsteIn "puRPOrtEd tO DemoNsTrate that any geNerAlLY CovarianT gRavitationaL field eqUaTIons iN the coNtext oF the EntWURf THeory wOuld VioLate physiCal DeTErminisM iN a SEvere aNd stRiKing maNner" [17], whICh waS DEclared later overCome iN THe GenERal relatIvIty and
 state of a system changes  in an arb itrar y f ash io n bu t wi thout its tota l  ene rgy being changed, the n the  d i stan t  g ravit ational ac t i onof  t hesy s te m doe s n ot chan ge, not ev enif  a part of t h eenergy ofthe  system is c onv ertedin tog ravit ati on en ergy.T he gra vitatingma s s is d e termine d by  its  total energy, in c lu d ing its gravit ationa le ne r g y"[13 ]. That Ei ns teinr atified ag a i n  in "On the Relat ivity Probl e m"when h ewro t e: "Th e ene rg y  of  a closed s yste m include s also the ene r gy of i ts gra vit ati onal fi el d;th u s,t he  la t ter  energymu st  itse lf c o n t r ibut e n ot o nly t o the inertia l b ut a l soto th e gra vita ti onalmass o f the  s ystem" [9]. Ofcour se, the e ner gy  of  t he gr a vitati ona l f ield is  of the sta ti c g ra vitational field a nd n oof gravi tation a lwa v es. In t he  eq uati o n s (6)  Ein s te in found  thatt he  t ensor o fgravit at ion alenerg y  tμν  and t he tenso r ofm aterial proces s  Tμν, taken t o ge t h er ,  det erm ining the g ravi t atio nalf ie lde xpres sed t hr o ug h  of ∆μν (φ) that wi th  equat ions(7) drove to"the coeff i c i ents guv  asg iv e n functions of  thexv. And th e se coeff icien ts are t o be unde r s tood asthe  co mpo nen t s  o f the gravita t i onal  p otentia l"[15]. T his  sy ste m o fequations  (6) was  p re se nt edas th e  general iz ati on  of  theP oisson  equa tion ,an d  al though, Ei n s tein  w ou ld h ave  w anted  the y  we re gene ral covar ian t  sin ce  h e belie ved wrongly t he y were the  g ene raliza t i on of pr inciple of relativity,t hat herea chedappa rently in  th e Gene ral Relati vity b ut th egen e r al co v a ri anc etruly as t h e  fr eedom  t o us e arbit rary spacetime coo r din ate systems " isnows h ar edb yv irt ua l lya l l modern formul ations ofsp a ce time theor i es,  i ncludin g moder n ver s ions of  specialrelativit yandN e wto nian space time the ory" [16] .  Howe v er , the  En twurfth eor y isΣ μν ∂ √ ggσ υ( Tμ ν+t μν ) ∂ xν  =0 c ov ariant l imited because tμν is o nly co nceiv abl e to thro ugh oflinearlytran sformation s.Thu s, Ei nst e in de clar e dhec ouldnotd emonstrat e  g ene r a lcovariancef o r  th ose g rav i tation al e quations due they were obtained(bes i d e t hec onse rv ation law of e ner gy r eally th etrue proble m) fromth e  cova riance  withrespect t ol ineartran sfo rmations.  Ei ns t ein sup po se d  throu gh o fequiva lencep rinc i p le between a gra vitat i o nal s y ste m and  a n accel e rate d system c ould sustai ner th em a s per missibl etransf orm at ions witht he genera l cov ariance .Butinthe En twur f theor y, E in ste in had to l ea v ede f ini tely  thege nera l covaria n ce throu ght he hole  a rgu m e nt, wi t ht h e which Ei nst ein " p u rported to demo n st r ate t hat an y gene rally c o var ia nt grav ita t i onal fiel d equatio n s i nthecontextof  the  E ntw ur f theory wouldviolatephysical d etermi nis m  ina  sever eand striking  mann er "  [17],w h ich  was de c lar edlat er o ver come in the General Relativit y an d
 state_of a_system changes in an_arbitrary fashion_but_without its_total_energy being changed,_then the distant_gravitational action of the_system does not_change,_not even if a part of the energy of the system is converted into_gravitation_energy. The_gravitating_mass_is determined by its total_energy, including its gravitational energy"_[13]. That_Einstein ratified again in "On the Relativity Problem"_when_he wrote: "The_energy of a closed system includes also the energy_of its gravitational field; thus, the_latter energy must_itself_contribute_not only to the_inertial but also to the gravitational_mass of the system" [9]. Of_course, the energy of the gravitational field_is of the static gravitational field_and no of gravitational waves._In the_equations (6) Einstein found that_the tensor of_gravitational energy_tμν and the_tensor of material process Tμν, taken_together, determining the_gravitational field expressed through of ∆μν_(φ)_that with equations_(7)_drove_to "the_coefficients guv as_given_functions of_the_xv. And these coefficients are to_be_understood as the components of the gravitational_potential" [15]. This system_of_equations (6) was presented_as the generalization of the_Poisson equation, and although, Einstein would_have wanted_they were_general covariant since he believed wrongly they were the generalization of_principle of relativity, that he reached_apparently in the General_Relativity but_the_general covariance truly_as_the freedom_to use arbitrary spacetime coordinate systems "is_now shared_by virtually all modern formulations of_spacetime theories, including modern_versions_of special relativity and Newtonian spacetime_theory" [16]. However, the Entwurf theory_is Σ μν ∂√g gσ_υ(Tμ_ν+tμν)_∂ xν =0 covariant limited_because tμν is only conceivable to_through of linearly_transformations. Thus, Einstein declared he could not_demonstrate_general covariance for those gravitational equations_due_they were obtained (beside the conservation_law_of_energy really the true problem)_from the covariance with respect to_linear transformations. Einstein supposed through of equivalence principle between_a gravitational system_and an accelerated system could_sustainer_them_as permissible transformations with the general covariance. But in the_Entwurf theory,_Einstein had to_leave definitely the general covariance through the hole argument, with_the which Einstein "purported to demonstrate that_any generally covariant gravitational field equations in the context of the_Entwurf theory would violate physical determinism in a_severe and striking manner" [17], which was_declared later overcome in_the_General Relativity and