 Quantification. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/plural-quant/>. LINNEBO, Ø. – NICOLAS, D. (2008): Superplurals in English. Analysis 68, No. 3, 186 – 197. MCKAY, T. J. (2006): Plural Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press. MOLTMANN, F. (1997): Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. OLIVER, A. – SMILEY, T. (2006): A Modest Logic for Plurals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, No. 3, 317 – 348. RAYO, A. (2006): Beyond Plurals. In: Rayo, A. – Uzquiano, G. (eds.): Absolute Generality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 220 – 253. ROITMAN, J. (1990): Introduction to Modern Set Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. WINTER, Y. (2002): Atoms and Sets: A Characterization of Semantic Number. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 493 – 505. YI, B-U. (2005): The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34, No. 5 6, 459 – 506. YI, B-U. (2006): The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, No. 3, 239 – 288. The Cosmic Void Eddy Keming Chen* July 11, 2020 Forthcoming in Sara Bernstein and Tyron Goldschmidt (eds.), Non-Being: New Essays on the Metaphysics of Nonexistence, Oxford University Press Abstract What exists at the fundamental level of reality? On the standard picture, the fundamental reality contains (among other things) fundamental matter, such as particles, fields, or even the quantum state. Non-fundamental facts are explained by facts about fundamental matter, at least in part. In this paper, I introduce a non-standard picture called the "cosmic void" in which the universe is devoid of any fundamental material ontology. Facts about tables and chairs are recovered from a special kind of laws that satisfy strong determinism. All non-fundamental facts are
Quantification. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed. ): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/plural-quant/ >. LINNEBO, Ø. – NICOLAS, D. (2008 ): Superplurals in English. Analysis 68, No. 3, 186 – 197. MCKAY, T. J. (2006 ): Plural Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press. MOLTMANN, F. (1997 ): Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. OLIVER, A. – SMILEY, T. (2006 ): A Modest Logic for Plurals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, No. 3, 317 – 348. RAYO, A. (2006 ): Beyond Plurals. In: Rayo, A. – Uzquiano, G. (eds. ): Absolute Generality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 220 – 253. ROITMAN, J. (1990 ): Introduction to Modern Set Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. WINTER, Y. (2002 ): atom and set: A Characterization of Semantic Number. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 493 – 505. YI, B - U. (2005 ): The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34, No. 5 6, 459 – 506. YI, B - U. (2006 ): The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, No. 3, 239 – 288. The Cosmic Void Eddy Keming Chen * July 11, 2020 Forthcoming in Sara Bernstein and Tyron Goldschmidt (eds .), Non - organism: New Essays on the Metaphysics of Nonexistence, Oxford University Press Abstract What exists at the fundamental level of world? On the standard video, the fundamental world control (among other thing) fundamental matter, such as particle, field, or even the quantum state. Non - fundamental facts are explain by facts about fundamental matter, at least in share. In this paper, I introduce a non - standard picture called the " cosmic nothingness " in which the universe is barren of any fundamental material ontology. Facts about tables and professorship are recovered from a special kind of laws that satisfy strong determinism. All non - cardinal fact are
 Quwntification. In: Zalta, E. K. (ed.): The Stanforb Encycnopediz of Phiuosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), URL = <hrtp://plqto.stanford.edu/archives/rpr2009/entried/plural-qyant/>. OINNEBO, Ø. – IJCOLAS, D. (2008): Supsvplurclw in English. Akalysis 68, No. 3, 186 – 197. MCKAY, T. J. (2006): Olbral Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Prqss. MOLYMWNN, F. (1997): Parts agd Wnjles pn Semantics. Oxford: Oxford Univsrsity Kress. OLIVER, A. – SMOLEY, T. (2006): A Modest Logic for Plugals. Journal of Phllosophical Logyx 35, No. 3, 317 – 348. RAHO, A. (2006): Beyond Plurals. Ih: Rayo, A. – Uzquiano, G. (eds.): Absoluge Geuerality. Oxdoed: Fnarendon Prxss, 220 – 253. ROITMAN, J. (1990): Lmtroduwtion tp Modern Set Tmeory. Neq York: John Wiley & Sois. WINTER, Y. (2002): Atoms agd Sets: A Ckaracterization of Senabtic Tumbar. Lkbgukstjc Ihquiry 33, 493 – 505. YI, B-U. (2005): Tge Logic ane Meaning of Pluralx. [qrt I. Journal of Phyljsophical Logic 34, No. 5 6, 459 – 506. YI, B-U. (2006): The Logpc ahd Meaning of Plurals. Pqrt II. Journal of Phiposophicaj Logic 35, No. 3, 239 – 288. The Cosmic Void Eddy Keming Chen* Buly 11, 2020 Foxbmcomkbg in Sara Bernstein and Tyron Goldschmidt (eds.), Gkn-Nepng: New Essays on the Metaphuslcx of Nonexistevce, Oxykrs University Press Abstrast Whqt exists at yhe fundamental level of reqlity? On the wtandard picture, tke fundamentcl reakity vontains (among other thnngs) fhndamental latter, sudf as particles, fkelcs, or even the quantum state. Non-fundanentcl facts are explayned by fafts anmut fundamental mahter, ct ledst in parh. In this paper, I introduce a non-standard picjura cdlled thz "cosmlc void" in whicr the universe is devjid ow any fundzmental material ogtology. Facts wbout tables and chayrs qre eecoverda from a specisl kind oy laww that satisfy strpng seterminism. All nob-fundamental favts arq
Quantification. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.): The of (Spring 2009 URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/plural-quant/>. (2008): in English. Analysis No. 3, 186 197. MCKAY, T. J. (2006): Plural Oxford: Clarendon Press. MOLTMANN, F. (1997): Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford Press. OLIVER, A. – SMILEY, T. (2006): A Modest Logic for Plurals. Journal Philosophical 35, 3, – 348. RAYO, A. (2006): Beyond Plurals. In: Rayo, A. – Uzquiano, G. (eds.): Absolute Generality. Clarendon Press, 220 – 253. ROITMAN, J. (1990): to Modern Set Theory. York: John Wiley & Sons. Y. Atoms and A of Number. Linguistic Inquiry 493 – 505. YI, B-U. (2005): The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical 34, No. 459 – YI, (2006): Logic and Meaning Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 239 – 288. The Cosmic Void Eddy Keming July 11, Forthcoming in Sara Bernstein and Tyron (eds.), Non-Being: New Essays on the Metaphysics of Oxford University Press Abstract What exists at the fundamental level of reality? On the standard fundamental reality contains (among things) fundamental matter, as fields, even quantum state. facts are explained by facts about fundamental matter, at least in In this paper, I introduce a non-standard picture called the in the universe is of any fundamental material Facts tables and chairs are a kind satisfy determinism. non-fundamental facts are
 Quantification. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.): the StanforD EncyCloPedIa Of PhIlosOphy (Spring 2009 EditIOn), URl = <http://plato.stanford.edu/aRchivEs/SPr2009/enTRiEs/pluRal-quanT/>. lInneBO, ø. – NiCoLAs, D. (2008): sUpErpluRalS in EnglIsh. AnalysiS 68, No. 3, 186 – 197. mCkAY, T. J. (2006): Plural PREdIcation. OxfOrd: clarendon PreSs. MoLTMANn, F. (1997): parTS and WHolEs in SEmantiCS. OxforD: Oxford UnIvERsity PREss. OLIVer, a. – SmILEy, T. (2006): A Modest Logic for pLuRAls. Journal of PhIlosopHiCAl lOGic 35, no. 3, 317 – 348. RaYO, A. (2006): Beyond plUrals. iN: Rayo, A. – UZQuIANO, G. (eDS.): Absolute GeneRality. OxforD: claRendon prEss, 220 – 253. roITMAN, j. (1990): IntrOdUCtiOn to Modern SEt ThEory. New YoRk: John wIley & SonS. wINTER, Y. (2002): atoms aNd SEts: a ChaRAcTeRizAtIOn oF seManTIc NUmber. LinGuIsTic InQuirY 33, 493 – 505. yi, b-u. (2005): The logIc anD MeanIng of Plurals. PArt i. JouRNal Of PhiLosopHicaL LOgic 34, NO. 5 6, 459 – 506. YI, B-U. (2006): THe LogIc And Meaning of PluRals. part II. JouRnaL oF PhIlOsophICal LogIc 35, NO. 3, 239 – 288. ThE Cosmic void EddY kemInG cHEn* july 11, 2020 Forthcoming in SArA bErNstein anD Tyron gOlDsCHmidt (eds.), noN-BeIng: NEW essayS on tHE MEtaphysiCs of NoNExIsTence, OxFoRd UnivErSitY PrEss AbSTracT What eXists at tHe funDAmental level of REality? On the stANdARD pICturE, thE fundamentaL reaLIty cOntaINs (AmoNG otheR thinGs) FUnDAmental matter, such as PaRticleS, fielDs, or even the quAntum state. nON-FundamenTal fACtS Are explained by Facts About fundaMEntal matTer, at Least in pArt. In this PAPer, I intrOduCe a Non-StaNDArD picture calleD THe "coSmIc void" iN whIch the uNivErsE is DevOiD of any funDamental MaTeRiAl OntOlogy. fActs abouT tAblEs And ChairS Are recOvereD froM a SpECiaL kind of LAwS THat sAtIsFy stRonG dEtermInisM. all Non-fundAmental faCts ARe
 Quantification. In: Zalta , E. N. (e d.):The  St an ford  Enc yclopedia of P h ilos ophy (Spring 2009 Edit ion),  U R L =< ht tp:// plato.s t an f o rd. ed u/ arc hi v es /spr2 009 /entrie s/plural-q uan t/ >. LINNEBO,Ø .– NICOLAS,  D.  (2008): Sup erp lurals  i n E n glish . A nalys is 68, No. 3,  186 – 19 7. MCKAY, T. J. ( 2 0 06 ): P lural Predication .  O x ford: Clarendo n Pres s. MO L T MAN N,F. (1997):  P artsa nd Whol e si n Sem a ntics. Oxford : Oxford Un i ver sity P re ss. OLIVER , A.–S MIL EY, T. (200 6):A ModestLogicf or Plur a ls. Jou rnal o f P hil osop h ic al  Lo gi c  35 ,  N o.3 , 3 17 – 348 .RA YO, A . (2 0 0 6 ) : Be yon d Pl urals . In: Rayo, A . –  Uzq u ian o, G.  (eds .):Ab solut e Gene ralit y.  Oxford: Claren donPress, 22 0 –  2 53.  R OITMA N , J. ( 199 0):  Introd uctiont o M od e r n  S et Theory. New Yor k: J oh n Wiley& Sons .  W IN T ER, Y. ( 20 02) : At o m s and  Set s :A Charac teriza t io nof Sema nt ic Num be r.Lin guist i c In quiry33, 493– 505 .  YI, B-U. (200 5 ): The Logica nd M ea n ingofPlurals. Pa rt I .  Jou rnal of  Ph i losop hical  L o gi c  34, No. 5 6, 459 –  5 06. YI , B-U . (2006): The  Logic and M e aning of  Plu r al s . Part II. Jou rnalof Philoso p hical Lo gic 3 5, No. 3 , 239 – 2 8 8 . The Co smi c V oid  Ed d y  K eming Chen* J u l y 11 ,2020 Fo rth cominginSar a B ern st ein and T yron Gol ds ch mi dt  (e ds.), Non-Bein g:  Ne wEss ays o n  the M etaph ysic sof Non existen c e, O xfor dUn iver sit yPress  Abs t rac t Whatexists at  th e  fun da me ntal le vel of realit y?  On the st an dar d pict u r e, the f undamental reality cont a ins (am ong  othe r th ings) fun dam entalmat t er, su ch asparti cl es, f ields , or  ev en  the quant u m  st ate.No n-fu ndament al facts are expla i ned  by facts abo utfund a m en tal ma t ter ,a t l e a st in part. Inthis paper ,I  i ntroduce a non -s tandard  pictur e cal l ed the"cosmic v oid" in w hi ch t h e  un iverse isdevoid o f any fun d ament a lmater ial  ontol og y.Facts  about tab les a nd cha ir s arerecov er ed froma special kind of lawsthat s atisf y s trong det erm i nis m. All no n-fu ndamentalfac tsare
 Quantification._In: Zalta,_E. N. (ed.): The_Stanford Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy (Spring_2009_Edition), URL =_<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/plural-quant/>. LINNEBO, Ø._– NICOLAS, D. (2008):_Superplurals in English._Analysis_68, No. 3, 186 – 197. MCKAY, T. J. (2006): Plural Predication. Oxford: Clarendon_Press._MOLTMANN, F._(1997):_Parts_and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford:_Oxford University Press. OLIVER, A._– SMILEY,_T. (2006): A Modest Logic for Plurals. Journal_of_Philosophical Logic 35,_No. 3, 317 – 348. RAYO, A. (2006): Beyond_Plurals. In: Rayo, A. – Uzquiano,_G. (eds.): Absolute_Generality._Oxford:_Clarendon Press, 220 –_253. ROITMAN, J. (1990): Introduction to_Modern Set Theory. New York: John_Wiley & Sons. WINTER, Y. (2002): Atoms_and Sets: A Characterization of Semantic_Number. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 493_– 505._YI, B-U. (2005): The Logic_and Meaning of_Plurals. Part_I. Journal of_Philosophical Logic 34, No. 5 6,_459 – 506._YI, B-U. (2006): The Logic and_Meaning_of Plurals. Part_II._Journal_of Philosophical_Logic 35, No._3,_239 –_288._The Cosmic Void Eddy Keming Chen*_July_11, 2020 Forthcoming in Sara Bernstein and_Tyron Goldschmidt (eds.), Non-Being:_New_Essays on the Metaphysics_of Nonexistence, Oxford University Press_Abstract What exists at the fundamental_level of_reality? On_the standard picture, the fundamental reality contains (among other things) fundamental_matter, such as particles, fields, or_even the quantum state._Non-fundamental facts_are_explained by facts_about_fundamental matter,_at least in part. In this paper,_I introduce_a non-standard picture called the "cosmic_void" in which the_universe_is devoid of any fundamental material_ontology. Facts about tables and chairs_are recovered from a special_kind_of_laws that satisfy strong determinism._All non-fundamental facts are