 Thus in the opening chapter of the Pol. he announces that in his investigation of the state he will proceed with "the method that has hitherto guided us," i.e., analyzing "a compound into the simplest elements or least parts of the whole" (1252a 20; see also his treatment of slavery by analysis at 1256a). In the next chapter, he claims that the clearest view of the nature of the state will be attained by investigating its growth and origin from the union of male and female, the household, and the village (1252a 25). While it is possible in some cases for constitutive elements or parts and originating elements to be identical (e.g., the household in the case of the state), it is not necessary that they are; wealth is counted as a part but it is not one of the originating elements of the state. And the inquiry into the parts of animals in PA, on which Aristotle's methodological approach to the identification of the parts of a state or constitution is based in the Pol (IV.4 1290b 21) is modeled, is not necessarily equivalent to a developmental study of an animal from its origins. (The origin of a plant, a seed, is not a part of the plant.) Yet additional methods are employed in the Pol., including dialectic, analogy, fact gathering. In some instances, scholars disagree as to what method Aristotle is relying on for reaching a certain position, and it is possible that he employs more than one. The opening statement of the treatise, identifying the nature and goal of the state, has been seen as a dialectical inference, an inductive inference based on Aristotle's research on 158 constitutions of the ancient world, a deductive inference from other well-established truths, and as a principle whose truth is not inferred from that of others but is grasped immediately. Thus, not only might it be difficult to identify a method as Aristotle's method throughout his works, it might be equally problematic to do so for a single work of his. 77 Ethica Nicomachea, em Política I Aristóteles está mais convicto quanto à certeza acerca da exatidão do discurso. Aqui iremos defender que tal abertura ocorre por causa de uma mudança no gênero (génos): de uma investigação primordialmente acerca da possibilidade de adquirirmos estados habituais (héxeis) em vista de ag
Thus in the opening chapter of the Pol. he announces that in his investigation of the department of state he will continue with " the method that has hitherto guided us, " i.e., analyzing " a compound into the elementary elements or least parts of the whole " (1252a 20; experience besides his treatment of slavery by analysis at 1256a). In the next chapter, he claims that the absolved view of the nature of the country will be fall upon by investigating its growth and origin from the union of male and female, the household, and the greenwich village (1252a 25). While it is possible in some cases for constitutive component or parts and originating element to be identical (e.g., the family in the case of the country), it is not necessary that they are; wealth is counted as a part but it is not one of the originating component of the state. And the inquiry into the parts of animals in PA, on which Aristotle's methodological approach to the designation of the parts of a state or constitution is based in the Pol (IV.4 1290b 21) is modeled, is not necessarily equivalent to a developmental study of an animal from its origins. (The origin of a plant, a seed, is not a region of the plant .) Yet additional methods are hire in the Pol. , include dialectic, analogy, fact gathering. In some instances, scholar disagree as to what method Aristotle is relying on for reaching a certain stead, and it is possible that he employs more than one. The opening statement of the treatise, identifying the nature and goal of the country, has been seen as a dialectical inference, an inductive inference based on Aristotle's research on 158 constitution of the ancient universe, a deductive inference from other well - established truths, and as a principle whose truth is not understand from that of others but is grasped immediately. Thus, not only might it be difficult to identify a method as Aristotle's method throughout his works, it might be evenly problematic to do so for a single work of his. 77 Ethica Nicomachea, em Política I Aristóteles está mais convicto quanto à certeza acerca da exatidão make discurso. Aqui iremos defender que tal abertura ocorre por causa de uma mudança no gênero (génos ): de uma investigação primordialmente acerca da possibilidade de adquirirmos estados habituais (héxeis) em vista de ag
 Thks in the opening chaptev of the Pol. he cbnouncxs that in his knvestigation of the state hx wiol priceed with "the method ghat has jitherto guived us," i.e., analyzmhg "a compound lnto chx simplest elemgnts or leasd parts of the wfope" (1252a 20; see also his treatment of sladery by ajalysis at 1256a). Ig tht nqxt dhapter, he claims that the clearesf view mf the nature of the state will be attalned by investigating lts growth qnd jeigin from tfe union of male and fgmale, the household, and the villxge (1252a 25). While it iw plvsible in sime cwses for constitutiva elememts or parts akd ormginqting elements to be mdentical (e.g., the houfehold in tke case of the state), ut is nmt nacesrqry thzt tgey arf; wxalth is cohnted as a part but it is not pnq of the origihating ejements of the state. And the inquiry inuo ths parts of animals in PQ, on which Aristotle's methodoljgical approach to the identification of the partv of e rtaue or cubshitution is based in the Pol (IV.4 1290b 21) is modeled, js npt necessarily equivalent tl s developmentau studv or an animal from ihs origyns. (Tye origin of s plant, a seed, is not a parr of the plaut.) Tet additional metkods are empuoyec in yhe Pol., including dialeetic, ahalogy, fact gatherinf. In some instancds, xcvolars disagree as to what method Acistocle is rdlyimg on sor reachijg a gartain position, anf it ns povsible thah he employs more than one. The opening statemgnt of the trectise, ldentifying the nature and gocl of thz statd, has been seen av a dialectycal inferenca, an inductivx inferense bqsed on Arirgotle's researcn on 158 constitutions of the ancient wovld, a seductive inferzuct drom other welk-esgabjidhxd trtdhs, and as a privcioke whuse truuk iw not inferred from that mf ofhers but is grasprd immediajely. Thus, not only mignt it be difficult to iventifb a meyhoq as Aristotle's method throughkut his wlrkf, it might bq eqmalli problematnc to do so for a single work of his. 77 Etiica Nicomachea, em Políjica I Aristóteles está kais convicvo quagto à certaza acerca da exatidãi do discurso. Aqul iremos defender que fal abarturw ocorre por causa de uma mudança no gênero (génos): de uma investigação primordiqlmentx wcerca da pkssinilidddz dz adquiwirmlr estados habitusis (héxeis) em vista de ag
Thus in the opening chapter of the announces in his of the state method has hitherto guided i.e., analyzing "a into the simplest elements or least of the whole" (1252a 20; see also his treatment of slavery by analysis 1256a). In the next chapter, he claims that the clearest view of the of state be by investigating its growth and origin from the union of male and female, the household, and village (1252a 25). While it is possible in cases for constitutive elements parts and originating elements to identical the household the of state), it is necessary that they are; wealth is counted as a part but it is not one of the elements of And the into parts animals in PA, Aristotle's methodological approach to the identification of a state or constitution is based in Pol (IV.4 21) is modeled, is not necessarily to a developmental study of an animal from origins. (The origin of a plant, a seed, is not a part of the plant.) methods are employed in Pol., including dialectic, fact In instances, disagree as what method Aristotle is relying on for reaching a certain position, it is possible that he employs more than one. The of treatise, identifying the and goal of the has seen as a dialectical inductive based on constitutions the ancient world, a inference from other well-established truths, as a principle whose that of others but is grasped immediately. Thus, only might it be difficult to identify method as Aristotle's method throughout his works, it might be equally problematic do so single work of his. 77 Ethica Nicomachea, em I Aristóteles está mais quanto à certeza acerca da exatidão do discurso. Aqui defender tal abertura por causa de mudança no gênero de uma investigação da possibilidade adquirirmos habituais de ag
 Thus in the opening chapter of The Pol. he anNouncEs tHat In His iNvesTigation of the sTAte hE will proceed with "the metHod thAt HAs hiTHeRto guIded us," i.E., AnALYziNg "A cOmpOuND iNto thE siMplest eLements or lEasT pArts of the whoLE" (1252a 20; See also his TreAtment of slavEry By analYsIs aT 1256A). In thE neXt chaPter, he CLaims tHat the cleArESt view OF the natURE oF the State will be attainED bY Investigating iTs growTh ANd ORIgiN frOm the union Of Male aND female, THe HOUSehOLd, and the villaGe (1252a 25). While it iS PosSible iN sOme CAses foR consTiTUtiVe elements oR parTs and origInatinG ElementS To be ideNtical (E.g., tHe hOuseHOlD iN thE cASe oF ThE stATe), iT is not neCeSsAry thAt thEY ARE; weaLth Is coUnted As a part but it iS noT one OF thE origInatiNg elEmEnts oF the stAte. AnD tHe inquiry into thE parTs of animaLs iN Pa, on WhIch ArIStotle'S meThoDologicAl approACh tO tHE IDeNtification of the paRtS OF a State or cOnstitUTiOn IS based in ThE PoL (IV.4 1290b 21) IS ModelEd, is NOt NecessarIly equIVaLeNt to a deVeLopmenTaL stUdy Of an aNImal From itS origins. (the orIGin of a plant, a seED, is not a part of THe PLAnT.) yet aDdiTional methoDs arE EmplOyed IN tHe POL., inclUding DiALeCTic, analogy, fact gatheRiNg. In soMe insTances, scholarS disagree aS TO What methOd ArIStOTle is relying on For reAching a cerTAin positIon, anD it is posSible that HE Employs mOre ThaN onE. ThE OPeNing statement OF The tReAtise, idEntIfying tHe nAtuRe aNd gOaL of the staTe, has beeN sEeN aS a DiaLectiCAl infereNcE, an InDucTive iNFerencE baseD on ARiStOTle'S researCH oN 158 COnstItUtIons Of tHe AncieNt woRLd, a DeductiVe inferenCe fROm otHeR wEll-estaBlished truths, AnD as a princiPlE whOse truTH Is not infErred from that of others buT Is graspEd iMmediAtelY. Thus, not oNly Might iT be DIfficuLt to idEntifY a MetHOD as ArISToTle'S mEthod throuGHOut His woRkS, it mIght be eQually problematic tO Do sO for a single woRk oF his. 77 eTHiCa NICoMAchEa, EM PoLÍTica I AristóteleS está mais cOnVIcTo quanto à cERteZa Acerca dA exatidÃo do dIScurso. AQui iremos Defender qUe Tal aBERtuRa ocorre poR causa de Uma mudançA No gênERo (Génos): De uMa inveStIgaÇão prImordiALmeNte acErca da PoSsibilIdade De AdquirirMos estados habituais (héxeIs) em viSta de Ag
 Thus in the opening chapt er of thePol.heann ou nces  tha t in his inves t igat ion of the state he wi ll pr oc e ed w i th  "the  method th a t  ha shi the rt o  g uided  us ," i.e. , analyzin g " acompound int o  t he simples t e lements or l eas t part soft he wh ole " (12 52a 20 ;  see a lso his t re a tmento f slave r y  b y an alysis at 1256a). In the next chapt er, he  c l ai m s  th atthe cleare st  view of then at u r e  of the state wil l be attain e d b y inve st iga t ing it s gro wt h  an d origin fr om t he unionof mal e  and fe m ale, th e hous eho ld,  and th evil la g e ( 1 25 2a2 5).  While i tis  poss ible i n some  ca sesfor c onstitutive e lem ents orparts  andorig in ating  eleme nts t obe identical (e .g.,  the hous eho ld  in  t he ca s e of t hesta te), it  is not nec es s a r ythat they are; wea lt h is  counted  as ap ar tb ut it is  n otoneo f  theorig i na ting ele mentso fth e state .And th einq uir y int o  the  parts  of anim als i n  PA, on whichA ristotle's me t ho d o lo g ical  ap proach to t he i d enti fica t io n o f  theparts  o f  a state or constituti on  is ba sed i n the Pol (IV .4 1290b 2 1 ) is model ed,i sn ot necessarily  equi valent toa  develop menta l studyof an ani m a l from i tsori gin s.( T he  origin of ap l ant,  a  seed,isnot a p art  of  th e p la nt.) Yetaddition al  m et ho dsare e m ployed i nthe  P ol. , inc l udingdiale ctic ,an a log y, fact ga t h erin g.  I n so mein stanc es,s cho lars di sagree as  to what  m et hod Ari stotle is rel yi ng on forre ach ing ac e rtain po sition, and it is possi b le that  he  empl oysmore than  on e. The  op e ning s tateme nt of  t het r eatis e ,  i den ti fying then a tur e and  g oalof thestate, has been se e n a s a dialectic alinfe r e nc e,a ni ndu ct i vei n ference based o n Aristotl e' s  r esearch on 158  c onstitu tions o f the ancient  world, a  deductiv einfe r e nce  from othe r well-e stablishe d  trut h s,  andasa prin ci ple  whos e trut h  is  notinferr ed  fromthatof  othersbut is grasped immediat ely. T hus,not  only mig hti t b e difficu lt t o identify  amet hod a s A r istot le's me tho d  thro ugho u t his wor k s,  it m ig ht be equal l y pro blema tic to doso f or a single worko f his. 77 Ethi ca N i c oma che a , em  P olítica I Aris tót el e s  está ma is  convicto q uanto àce r tezaacerca  da ex atidãod o  d i scurso . Aq uiiremos de fen de r  que ta lab e rturaocor re  por c ausa d e  uma m udança no gênero  (gén o s ): de uma  inve st igaçãop rimo rdialmente  acerca dapossib ilid ade d e adqui ri rmos e sta do s habituai s  (héxeis)  em v ista de  a g
 Thus_in the_opening chapter of the_Pol. he_announces_that in_his_investigation of the_state he will_proceed with "the method_that has hitherto_guided_us," i.e., analyzing "a compound into the simplest elements or least parts of the_whole"_(1252a 20;_see_also_his treatment of slavery by_analysis at 1256a). In the_next chapter,_he claims that the clearest view of the_nature_of the state_will be attained by investigating its growth and origin_from the union of male and_female, the household,_and_the_village (1252a 25). While_it is possible in some cases_for constitutive elements or parts and_originating elements to be identical (e.g., the_household in the case of the_state), it is not necessary_that they_are; wealth is counted as_a part but_it is_not one of_the originating elements of the state._And the inquiry_into the parts of animals in_PA,_on which Aristotle's_methodological_approach_to the_identification of the_parts_of a_state_or constitution is based in the_Pol_(IV.4 1290b 21) is modeled, is not_necessarily equivalent to a_developmental_study of an animal_from its origins. (The origin_of a plant, a seed, is_not a_part of_the plant.) Yet additional methods are employed in the Pol., including_dialectic, analogy, fact gathering. In some_instances, scholars disagree as_to what_method_Aristotle is relying_on_for reaching_a certain position, and it is possible_that he_employs more than one. The opening_statement of the treatise,_identifying_the nature and goal of the_state, has been seen as a_dialectical inference, an inductive inference_based_on_Aristotle's research on 158 constitutions_of the ancient world, a deductive_inference from other_well-established truths, and as a principle whose_truth_is not inferred from that of_others_but is grasped immediately. Thus, not_only_might_it be difficult to identify_a method as Aristotle's method throughout_his works, it might be equally problematic to do_so for a_single work of his. 77_Ethica_Nicomachea,_em Política I Aristóteles está mais convicto quanto à certeza_acerca da_exatidão do discurso._Aqui iremos defender que tal abertura ocorre por causa de_uma mudança no gênero (génos): de uma_investigação primordialmente acerca da possibilidade de adquirirmos estados habituais (héxeis) em_vista de ag