 opposite charges) represent the "difference" of the particles compared to the physical "nothing" (which is not a vacuum, but the result of their physical annihilation). Thus, particles identical to their antiparticles (such as photons, Z0 bosons, π0 mesons) represent the physical nothing from the viewpoint of the physical being (which may be defined as possessing any nonzero mass at rest) 4. What the Higgs mechanism moving within the pole of "first philosophy" means is very simple, but hardly obvious: the nothing is unstable. It breaks down "spontaneously", i.e. by itself. All being is due to that fundamental instability of the nothing, and thus that instability should underlie the concept of creation. The answer to our initial question "Why anything rather than nothing" is: because the nothing is unstable. However, there is one even more fundamental question: "Why is the nothing unstable?" The question seems not to allow a direct physical answer. It needs a mathematical reason that could be revealed in the foundation of mathematics – in set theory – and will be discussed 3 A complex relation between "choice" (the axiom of choice) and the imaginary and real domains of Minkowski space utilized by special relativity on the one hand, and the complex separable Hilbert space utilized by quantum mechanics on the other hand, is available. Namely: by means of the axiom of choice, the imaginary domain may be mapped isomorphically into that Hilbert space, thereby cutting the real domain equivalent to the opposite direction of time, or in other words, choosing the imaginary domain of Minkowski space. 4 The "boundary" of the physical nothing between particles and antiparticles is, in a sense, conventional. Theoretically, this could be any state. In fact, this state is determined unambiguously by the three most fundamental physical constants: the Planck constant, the light speed in vacuum, and the gravitational constant. It may be considered as "zero" only ontologically, for those constants imply nonzero physical parameters for it. 155Why anything rather than nothing? as the mathematical necessity of creation later in the article. What the Higgs mechanism discusses immediately is how the elementary particles corresponding to the weak and strong fields, unlike those of the electromagnetic field, acquire their nonzero mass at rest – something that all experiments confirm. Furthermore, it discusses the way for all possessing nonzero mass at rest to acquire it. Consequently, the Higgs mechanism elucidates how matter in a physical sense always appears. It follows that the pole of ontology can be represented as follows:
opposite charges) represent the " difference " of the particle compare to the physical " nothing " (which is not a vacuum, but the result of their forcible annihilation). Thus, particles identical to their antiparticles (such as photons, Z0 boson, π0 meson) represent the physical nothing from the viewpoint of the physical being (which may be define as possessing any nonzero mass at respite) 4. What the Higgs mechanism move within the pole of " first philosophy " means is very simple, but barely obvious: the nothing is unstable. It breaks down " spontaneously ", i.e. by itself. All being is ascribable to that fundamental instability of the nothing, and thus that instability should underlie the concept of creation. The solution to our initial question " Why anything quite than nothing " is: because the nothing is unstable. However, there is one even more fundamental doubt: " Why is the nothing unstable? " The question seems not to allow a direct physical answer. It needs a mathematical reason that could be revealed in the foundation of mathematics – in set theory – and will be discussed 3 A complex relation between " choice " (the maxim of option) and the imaginary and real domains of Minkowski quad utilized by special relativity on the one hand, and the complex dissociable Hilbert space use by quantum mechanics on the other bridge player, is available. Namely: by means of the axiom of choice, the imaginary domain may be mapped isomorphically into that Hilbert distance, thereby cutting the real domain equivalent to the opposite management of clock time, or in other words, choosing the imaginary domain of Minkowski quad. 4 The " boundary " of the physical nothing between particles and antiparticles is, in a common sense, conventional. Theoretically, this could be any country. In fact, this state is determined uniquely by the three most fundamental physical constants: the Planck constant, the light focal ratio in vacuum, and the gravitational constant. It may be consider as " zero " only ontologically, for those constant imply nonzero forcible parameters for it. 155Why anything rather than nothing? as the mathematical necessity of universe later in the article. What the Higgs mechanism hash out immediately is how the elementary particles corresponding to the weak and strong fields, unlike those of the electromagnetic field, acquire their nonzero mass at rest – something that all experiments confirm. Furthermore, it discourse the way for all possessing nonzero batch at rest to acquire it. Consequently, the Higgs mechanism elucidates how matter in a physical sense always appear. It follows that the pole of ontology can be represented as follows:
 opoosite charges) represent the "difference" of the partidles comoared to the physical "nothinj" (whuch iw not a vacuum, but the result ov their physmcal annihilatioi). Thus, particlsd idznvical to their sntiparticnes (such as phmtund, Z0 bosons, π0 mesons) represent the phrsical mohhing from the viee[oinf of the physical being (which may ge defiied as possessimg any nonzero mass at resh) 4. Wjat the Higgs mechwnism movint wieyin the pole of "first khnlosophy" mezns is very simple, but hardly ocvioux: the nothunt id unstable. Iv breahs down "sponbsneousny", i.e. bu itself. All bcing ms dye to that fundamentan instability of tre nothinc, cnd thus that instabioiry shmuld unddelid tge ckncept of creation. Fhe answer ro our initial quesuiog "Why anything rathew ehan nothing" is: because the nothing is lnstzble. However, there is obe even more fundamenjal questijn: "Why is the nothing unstable?" The question seems not vo aloor q firect physical answer. It needs a mathematicaj rtaspn that could ne revealed in the flumqation of matfematiea – in set theory – anf will fe diwcussed 3 W cokplex relation between "choixe" (the axiom if choice) and the nmaginary anb real domaons of Minkowski space btilizsd by speciwl relatibkty on the one hxnd, atd the complex separable Hylbert spece ucilized cy qoantum iechanics ln thc other hand, is avallablg. Nameny: by meand of the axiom of choice, the imejinary domain mdy te mappeb isomprphically ineo that Hilberj space, tkereby cutting tge real domain equyvalent to tha opposite dicection os tine, oe in otfdr words, choosong the imaginary dimain of Minkowski spxde. 4 The "boundarv" if the physical noghigg bxtweeg particles atd avtiosrticues is, in a rensr, conventional. Theoraticzlly, this could be aky state. Un fact, ehis state is determined unambihuousny uy the thtee most fundamental physical cknstants: hhe Planck conseant, the light s'eed in vacuum, and the gravitational conwtant. It may be cobsidered as "zero" onkn ontologicakly, fjr those wonstants imply nonzwro physical paraketers for it. 155Why anyfhing satheg than nothing? as the mathematical necessity of creation later in the artucle. Wiae the Higgs mecnanisk biseusses ymmevietely is how the vlementary particles correspondiig to the feck and strong fields, unlike tnore of the eleztromagnetic field, acquide their nonzero mass at rest – somethinb that all experiments cpnfirm. Fyrthedmore, pj dmscusses the way for all pmsseswing nobzerl mass at resg tp wcquire ih. Coisesuently, the Higgs mechanism elucudates hlw matter in a piysical sensc xlwaya appewrs. It follows tgat fje poue of ontologu can be reprexented as follows:
opposite charges) represent the "difference" of the to physical "nothing" is not a their annihilation). Thus, particles to their antiparticles as photons, Z0 bosons, π0 mesons) the physical nothing from the viewpoint of the physical being (which may be as possessing any nonzero mass at rest) 4. What the Higgs mechanism moving the of philosophy" is very simple, but hardly obvious: the nothing is unstable. It breaks down "spontaneously", i.e. by All being is due to that fundamental instability the nothing, and thus instability should underlie the concept creation. answer to initial "Why rather than nothing" because the nothing is unstable. However, there is one even more fundamental question: "Why is the nothing The question to allow direct answer. needs a mathematical could be revealed in the foundation in set theory – and will be discussed A complex between "choice" (the axiom of choice) the imaginary and real domains of Minkowski space by special relativity on the one hand, and the complex separable Hilbert space utilized by on the other hand, available. Namely: by of axiom choice, imaginary domain be mapped isomorphically into that Hilbert space, thereby cutting the real equivalent to the opposite direction of time, or in other the domain of Minkowski 4 The "boundary" of physical between particles and antiparticles a conventional. be state. fact, this state is unambiguously by the three most physical constants: the Planck vacuum, and the gravitational constant. It may be as "zero" only ontologically, for those constants nonzero physical parameters for it. 155Why anything rather than nothing? as the necessity of in the article. What the Higgs mechanism discusses is how the elementary corresponding to the weak and strong fields, unlike those the field, acquire nonzero mass at – something that experiments confirm. Furthermore, the way all nonzero to acquire it. Consequently, the Higgs elucidates matter in a physical sense appears. that the pole of ontology can be represented as follows:
 opposite charges) represent tHe "differenCe" of tHe pArtIcLes cOmpaRed to the physicAL "notHing" (which is not a vacuum, bUt the ReSUlt oF ThEir phYsical aNNiHILatIoN). THus, PaRTiCles iDenTical to Their antipArtIcLes (such as phoTOnS, Z0 bosons, π0 mEsoNs) represent tHe pHysicaL nOthINg froM thE viewPoint oF The phySical beinG (wHIch may BE defineD AS pOsseSsing any nonzero maSS aT Rest) 4. What the HigGs mechAnISm MOVinG wiThin the polE oF "firsT PhilosoPHy" MEANs iS Very simple, but Hardly obvioUS: thE nothiNg Is uNStable. it breAkS DowN "spontaneouSly", i.E. by itself. all beiNG is due tO That funDamentAl iNstAbilITy Of The NoTHinG, AnD thUS thAt instabIlItY shouLd unDERLIe thE coNcepT of crEation. The answEr tO our INitIal quEstioN "Why AnYthinG ratheR than NoThing" is: because tHe noThing is unStaBlE. HoWeVer, thERe is onE evEn mOre fundAmental QUesTiON: "wHy Is the nothing unstabLe?" tHE qUestion sEems noT To AlLOw a direcT pHysIcal ANSwer. IT neeDS a MathematIcal reASoN tHat coulD bE reveaLeD in The FoundATion Of mathEmatics – iN set tHEory – and will be dIScussed 3 A complEX rELAtIOn beTweEn "choice" (the AxioM Of chOice) ANd The IMaginAry anD rEAl DOmains of Minkowski spAcE utiliZed by Special relatiVity on the oNE HAnd, and thE comPLeX Separable HilbeRt spaCe utilized BY quantum MechaNics on thE other hanD, IS availabLe. NAmeLy: bY meANS oF the axiom of chOICe, thE iMaginarY doMain may Be mAppEd iSomOrPhically iNto that HIlBeRt SpAce, ThereBY cutting ThE reAl DomAin eqUIvalenT to thE oppOsItE DirEction oF TiME, Or in OtHeR worDs, cHoOsing The iMAgiNary domAin of MinkOwsKI spaCe. 4 thE "boundaRy" of the physicAl Nothing betWeEn pArticlES And antipArticles is, in a sense, conveNTional. THeoReticAlly, This could Be aNy statE. In FAct, thiS state Is detErMinED UnambIGUoUslY bY the three mOST fuNdameNtAl phYsical cOnstants: the Planck cONstAnt, the light spEed In vaCUUm, And THe GRavItATioNAL constant. It may bE considereD aS "ZeRo" only ontoLOgiCaLly, for tHose conStantS Imply noNzero physIcal paramEtErs fOR It. 155WHy anything Rather thAn nothing? AS the mAThEmatiCal NecessItY of CreatIon latER in The arTicle. WHaT the HiGgs meChAnism disCusses immediately is how tHe elemEntarY paRticles coRreSPonDing to the Weak And strong fIelDs, uNlike ThoSE of thE eleCTrOmaGNetic FielD, Acquire thEIr NonZERo Mass at rest – sOMEThiNg thaT alL ExperiMentS confirm. FurthermoRE, it discusses thE way FOR alL poSSessInG nonzero mass at ResT tO ACquire it. coNsequently, tHe Higgs mEcHAnism ElucidAtes hoW matter IN A pHYsical SensE alWays appeaRs. IT fOLlows thAt ThE Pole of OntoLoGy can bE repreSEnteD AS follows:
 opposite charges) represe nt the "di ffere nce " o fthepart icles compared to t he physical "nothing"(whic hi s no t  a  vacu um, but th e res ul tofth e ir  phys ica l annih ilation).Thu s,  particles i d en tical to t hei r antipartic les  (such  a s p h otons , Z 0 bos ons, π 0  meson s) repres en t  the p h ysicaln o th ingfrom the viewpoin t  o f  the physicalbeing(w h ic h may  be  defined a sposse s sing an y  n o n z ero mass at rest)  4. What th e  Hi ggs me ch ani s m movi ng wi th i n t he pole of"fir st philos ophy"m eans is very si mple,but  ha rdly ob vi ous :t hen ot hin g  is  unstabl e.  I t bre aksd o w n  "sp ont aneo usly" , i.e. by its elf . Al l  be ing i s due  toth at fu ndamen tal i ns tability of the  not hing, and  th us  th at  inst a bility  sh oul d under lie the con ce p t of  creation. The ans we r to  our ini tial q u es ti o n "Why a ny thi ng r a t her t hann ot hing" is : beca u se  t he noth in g is u ns tab le.  Howe v er,thereis one e ven m o re fundamental question: "Wh y  i s th e  not hin g unstable? " Th e  que stio n  s eem s  notto al lo w  a direct physical ans we r. Itneeds  a mathematic al reasont h a t couldbe r e ve a led in the fou ndati on of math e matics –  in s et theor y – and w i l l be dis cus sed  3A c o m pl ex relation b e t ween  " choice"  (t he axio m o f c hoi ce)  a nd the im aginaryan dre al  do mains of Minko ws kisp ace  util i zed by  spec ialre la t ivi ty on t h eo n e ha nd ,andthe  c omple x se p ara ble Hil bert spac e u t iliz ed  b y quant um mechanicson  the other  h and , is a v a ilable.Namely: by means of the axiom o f c hoice , th e imagina rydomain  ma y  be ma pped i somor ph ica l l y int o th atHi lbert spac e ,  th ereby  c utti ng thereal domain equiva l ent  to the oppos ite  dir e c ti ono ft ime ,o r i n other words, ch oosing the  i m ag inary doma i n o fMinkows ki spac e. 4T he "bou ndary" of  the phys ic al n o t hin g betweenparticle s and ant i parti c le s is,  in  a sen se , c onven tional .  Th eoret ically ,this c ouldbe  any sta te. In fact, this state  is de termi ned  unambigu ous l y b y the thr ee m ost fundam ent alphysi cal const ants :  t heP lanck  con s tant, the li ght s pe ed in vacuu m , and  thegra v itatio nalconstant. It mayb e considered a s "z e r o"onl y  ont ol ogically, fortho se c onstants  i mply nonzer o physic al param etersfor it . 155Wh y an y thingrath erthan noth ing ?a s the m at he m atical  nec es sity o f crea t ionl a ter in the artic le. W h a t the Hig gs me ch anism d i scus ses immedi ately is ho w theelem entar y parti cl es cor res po nding to t h e weak an d str ong fie ld s, u nli ke tho se o f the e lect ro mag netic fie l d ,a cq ui r e t heir  nonz er o ma ss at res t  – somet hin g  that a ll  ex p e riment s  c o n firm. Furt her more, i t discusse s  the wa y  forall po ssessi ng nonz e roma ss at r est t o acquire  it. Cons e que nt ly,the Higg smech an ism  e lucidates how m atter in  a physi c a l sens e a l ways appear s.  It followsthatth e  pole o f ont ology c a n b e r epr esen ted  asf ollows:
 opposite_charges) represent_the "difference" of the_particles compared_to_the physical_"nothing"_(which is not_a vacuum, but_the result of their_physical annihilation). Thus,_particles_identical to their antiparticles (such as photons, Z0 bosons, π0 mesons) represent the physical_nothing_from the_viewpoint_of_the physical being (which may_be defined as possessing any_nonzero mass_at rest) 4. What the Higgs mechanism moving_within_the pole of_"first philosophy" means is very simple, but hardly obvious:_the nothing is unstable. It breaks_down "spontaneously", i.e._by_itself._All being is due_to that fundamental instability of the_nothing, and thus that instability should_underlie the concept of creation. The answer_to our initial question "Why anything_rather than nothing" is: because_the nothing_is unstable. However, there is_one even more_fundamental question:_"Why is the_nothing unstable?" The question seems not_to allow a_direct physical answer. It needs a_mathematical_reason that could_be_revealed_in the_foundation of mathematics_–_in set_theory_– and will be discussed 3_A_complex relation between "choice" (the axiom of_choice) and the imaginary_and_real domains of Minkowski_space utilized by special relativity_on the one hand, and the_complex separable_Hilbert space_utilized by quantum mechanics on the other hand, is available. Namely:_by means of the axiom of_choice, the imaginary domain_may be_mapped_isomorphically into that_Hilbert_space, thereby_cutting the real domain equivalent to the_opposite direction_of time, or in other words,_choosing the imaginary domain_of_Minkowski space. 4 The "boundary" of_the physical nothing between particles and_antiparticles is, in a sense,_conventional._Theoretically,_this could be any state._In fact, this state is determined_unambiguously by the_three most fundamental physical constants: the Planck_constant,_the light speed in vacuum, and_the_gravitational constant. It may be considered_as_"zero"_only ontologically, for those constants_imply nonzero physical parameters for it._155Why anything rather than nothing? as the mathematical necessity_of creation later_in the article. What the_Higgs_mechanism_discusses immediately is how the elementary particles corresponding to the_weak and_strong fields, unlike_those of the electromagnetic field, acquire their nonzero mass at_rest – something that all experiments confirm._Furthermore, it discusses the way for all possessing nonzero mass at_rest to acquire it. Consequently, the Higgs mechanism_elucidates how matter in a physical sense_always appears. It follows_that_the pole of ontology can be represented_as_follows: