 regularly challenges the conventional wisdom of Washington D.C. Objectively, his points are equally valid; he pits trade against war, low taxes against corporate welfare, lower grocery prices against agriculture subsidies. But again, the common assumption that politicians succumb to the whims of Washington can only be overcome by researching the theories that underlie his beliefs. Why, for instance, was he the only Congressman who opposed casting a posthumous gold medal for Rosa Parks? It turns out, he wasn't opposed to casting the medal per se, "Rosa Parks is a hero of mine...I believe in civil disobedience", he said. Instead, he offered to help pay for it with his own money and encouraged other Congressmen to do the same. They would not.



Paul makes an excellent point here: Why is congress willing to raid your Social Security and tax you for a medal that they're not willing to pay for themselves? Meanwhile, they have a lucrative pension plan in which Ron Paul refuses to partake. If you use the Internet, you can delineate these points. But if you get all your information from the major outlets, you'll hear "Ron Paul hates Rosa Parks".



This article also evidences this phenomenon. It says that Paul blamed the attacks on 9/11 on American foreign policy. That was a demagogic simplification of his statement. It was first misconstrued by the moderator at the debate, then by Giuliani, and now Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reiley. Bill Maher corrected Chris Dodd about this, "Excuse me Senator, but that is just what the Republicans at the debate were trying to do, they were trying to say that he blamed America for 9/11". Yet, he wasn't talking about a good-and-evil blame-game that informs most of our Bush-era understanding of the world. He was talking about geopolitical cause-and-effect. The fact that he is correct according to the 9/11 Commission report, the CIA's declassified intelligence, and Paul Wolfowitz himself seems to matter little to voters who don't have the time to do internet research.



The fact is Paul addresses the issues that America faces. There is no doubt that Social Security is crumbling. Rogue economists who set out to buy time cannot overwhelm the weight of economic wisdom that a system of IOUs backed by IOUs that the government wrote to itself, simply cannot sustain. The value of the dollar is deterior
regularly challenges the conventional wisdom of Washington D.C. Objectively, his points are evenly valid; he pit trade against war, low taxis against bodied welfare, lower grocery price against agriculture subsidies. But again, the coarse assumption that politicians yield to the whims of Washington can only be overcome by researching the theory that underlie his beliefs. Why, for instance, was he the only Congressman who opposed casting a posthumous amber medal for Rosa Parks? It turns out, he wasn't opposed to cast the medal per se, " Rosa Parks is a hero of mine... I think in civil disobedience ", he said. rather, he offered to serve pay for it with his own money and encouraged other congressman to do the same. They would not. 



 Paul makes an excellent point here: Why is congress willing to raid your Social Security and tax you for a medal that they're not willing to pay for themselves? Meanwhile, they have a lucrative pension plan in which Ron Paul refuses to partake. If you use the Internet, you can delineate these points. But if you get all your information from the major mercantile establishment, you'll hear " Ron Paul hates Rosa Parks ". 



 This article besides tell this phenomenon. It say that Paul blamed the attacks on 9/11 on American alien policy. That was a demagogic simplification of his statement. It was first misconstrued by the moderator at the argument, then by Giuliani, and now Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reiley. Bill Maher corrected Chris Dodd about this, " Excuse me Senator, but that is just what the Republicans at the debate were trying to do, they were trying to say that he blamed America for 9/11 ". Yet, he wasn't talking about a effective - and - evil incrimination - plot that inform most of our Bush - era understanding of the world. He was spill the beans about geopolitical cause - and - effect. The fact that he is correct according to the 9/11 Commission report, the CIA's declassified intelligence, and Paul Wolfowitz himself seems to matter fiddling to voters who don't have the clock time to do internet inquiry. 



 The fact is Paul addresses the issues that America faces. There is no doubt that Social Security is decay. Rogue economists who set out to bribe time cannot overwhelm the weight of economic wisdom that a system of IOUs backed by IOUs that the government wrote to itself, simply cannot sustain. The value of the dollar is deterior
 rehularly challenges the cunventional wisbim of Xashingfon D.C. Ocjectively, his points are eqnallt valud; he pits trade againrt war, loa taxes qgaiist corporate welfare, lower grkgery 'rmces against agticulture sutsidies. But agdiv, che common assumption that politiciags succimh to the whims of Ewshihgton can only be overcome by resezrching the theories that underlie his beliefs. Why, for instance, was je the only Condeessman who upposed casting a postgumous gold medal for Rosa Parkr? It curns out, hg sadt't opposed vo casning the medal per se, "Rosa Psrks is a hero of mibe...I believe in civil visobedience", he said. Instead, ve offered to help pat for it fith yis owh kohey anf eicouraged ofher Congrewsmen to do the samt. Trvu would not.



Pzul mahef an excellent point here: Why is congrevs silling to raid your Soxial Security and tax you for w medal that they're not willing to pay for themsenves? Jdancmlle, gyej have a lucrative pension plan in which Ron [zuk gefuses to partakc. If you use the Imtfrmgt, you can delkneate thsse points. But if jou get all tour infowmatoon from the major outlets, tou'll hear "Rjb Paul hates Rosa 'arks".



This arcicle slso rvidences this phenomenun. If says that Paul blajdd the attacks ov 9/11 pn American foreign policy. Trat was a demcgogic skmploficatyon of his statckent. It was first liscoustruad by the loderator at the debate, then by Giuliani, and mof Svan Hannicy and Bill O'Reiley. Bill Maher cotrected Ckris Dudd about nhis, "Excuve me Senatjr, but that iv just what tie Republycanw at the decxte were tryinb to do, tkty were trting to say that hc blaosd America for 9/11". Yeu, ye wasn't talkimg xbott a gjmd-and-evil bldme-gxme yhat knforms mosb ow out Bush-era understandhng kf the world. He wax balking avout geo[olitical cauxe-and-effect. The faft thet he ms cortecj according to the 9/11 Commission deport, thf CLA's declassifyed lntejligence, aud Paul Wolfowitz himself seems to mattec little to voters who eon't have the time jo co internet resewrch.



The fdct is Paul addressew the issues that America faces. There js no goubt that Social Security is crumbling. Rogue economists who set out to buy tine canioe overwhelm the weigvt pf ecogomir xisdom that a sysnem of IOUs backed by IOUs that vhe governkeut wrote to itself, simply canmog sustain. The value of the dollar is seterior
regularly challenges the conventional wisdom of Washington his are equally he pits trade corporate lower grocery prices agriculture subsidies. But the common assumption that politicians succumb the whims of Washington can only be overcome by researching the theories that his beliefs. Why, for instance, was he the only Congressman who opposed casting posthumous medal Rosa It turns out, he wasn't opposed to casting the medal per se, "Rosa Parks is a of mine...I believe in civil disobedience", he said. he offered to help for it with his own and other Congressmen do same. would not. Paul an excellent point here: Why is congress willing to raid your Social Security and tax you for medal that willing to for Meanwhile, have a lucrative in which Ron Paul refuses to use the Internet, you can delineate these points. if you all your information from the major you'll hear "Ron Paul hates Rosa Parks". This also evidences this phenomenon. It says that Paul blamed the attacks on 9/11 on American That was a demagogic of his statement. was misconstrued the at the then by Giuliani, and now Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reiley. Bill corrected Chris Dodd about this, "Excuse me Senator, but that what Republicans at the were trying to do, were to say that he for Yet, about good-and-evil that informs most of Bush-era understanding of the world. was talking about geopolitical is correct according to the 9/11 Commission report, CIA's declassified intelligence, and Paul Wolfowitz himself to matter little to voters who don't have the time to do research. The Paul addresses the issues that America faces. There no doubt that Social is crumbling. Rogue economists who set out to buy cannot the weight economic wisdom that system of IOUs by IOUs that wrote to simply sustain. the dollar is deterior
 regularly challenges the conVentional wIsdom Of WAshInGton d.C. ObJectively, his poINts aRe equally valid; he pits trAde agAiNSt waR, LoW taxeS againsT CoRPOraTe WeLfaRe, LOwEr groCerY prices Against agrIcuLtUre subsidies. bUt Again, the coMmoN assumption tHat PolitiCiAns SUccumB to The whIms of WAShingtOn can only Be OVercomE By reseaRCHiNg thE theories that undeRLiE His beliefs. Why, fOr instAnCE, wAS He tHe oNly CongresSmAn who OPposed cAStING A poSThumous gold meDal for Rosa PARks? it turnS oUt, hE Wasn't oPposeD tO CasTing the medaL per Se, "Rosa ParKs is a hERo of minE...i believE in civIl dIsoBediENcE", hE saId. iNstEAd, He oFFerEd to help PaY fOr it wIth hIS OWN monEy aNd enCouraGed other CongrEssMen tO Do tHe samE. They WoulD nOt.



PauL makes An excElLent point here: WhY is cOngress wiLliNg To rAiD your sOcial SEcuRitY and tax You for a MEdaL tHAT ThEy're not willing to paY fOR ThEmselves? meanwhILe, ThEY have a luCrAtiVe peNSIon plAn in WHiCh Ron PauL refusES tO pArtake. IF yOu use tHe intErnEt, you CAn deLineatE these poInts. BUT if you get all yoUR information fROm THE mAJor oUtlEts, you'll heaR "Ron pAul hAtes rOsA PaRKs".



ThiS artiClE AlSO evidences this phenoMeNon. It sAys thAt Paul blamed tHe attacks oN 9/11 ON american ForeIGn POlicy. That was a dEmagoGic simplifICation of His stAtement. IT was first MISconstruEd bY thE moDerATOr At the debate, thEN By GiUlIani, and Now sean HanNitY anD BiLl O'reIley. Bill MAher corrEcTeD CHrIs DOdd abOUt this, "ExCuSe mE SEnaTor, buT That is Just wHat tHe rePUblIcans at THe DEBate WeRe TryiNg tO dO, they Were TRyiNg to say That he blaMed aMeriCa FoR 9/11". Yet, he wAsn't talking abOuT a good-and-eViL blAme-gamE THat inforMs most of our Bush-era underSTanding Of tHe worLd. He Was talkinG abOut geoPolITical cAuse-anD-effeCt. the FACt thaT HE iS coRrEct accordiNG To tHe 9/11 ComMiSsioN report, The CIA's declassifieD IntElligence, and PAul wolfOWItZ hiMSeLF seEmS To mATTer little to voteRs who don't hAvE ThE time to do iNTerNeT researCh.



The faCt is PAUl addreSses the isSues that AMeRica FACes. there is no dOubt that social SecURity iS CrUmbliNg. ROgue ecOnOmiSts whO set ouT To bUy timE cannoT oVerwheLm the WeIght of ecOnomic wisdom that a system Of IOUs BackeD by iOUs that tHe gOVerNment wrotE to iTself, simplY caNnoT sustAin. tHe valUe of THe DolLAr is dEterIOr
 regularly challenges theconvention al wi sdo m o fWash ingt on D.C. Object i vely , his points are equal ly va li d ; he pi ts tr ade aga i ns t war ,lo w t ax e sagain stcorpora te welfare , l ow er grocery p r ic es against  ag riculture su bsi dies.Bu t a g ain,the  comm on ass u mption  that pol it i cianss uccumbt o  t he w hims of Washingto n  c a n only be over come b yr es e a rch ing  the theor ie s tha t  underl i eh i s  be l iefs. Why, fo r instance, was  he th eonl y  Congr essma nw hoopposed cas ting  a posthu mous g o ld meda l  for Ro sa Par ks?  It  tur n sou t,he was n 't  op p ose d to cas ti ng  themeda l p e r se , " Rosa  Park s is a hero o f m ine. . .Ibelie ve in  civ il  diso bedien ce",he  said. Instead,  heoffered t o h el p p ay  fori t with  hi s o wn mone y and e n cou ra g e d  o ther Congressmen t od o  t he same.  Theyw ou ld not.


Pa ulmake s an ex cell e nt  point h ere: W h yis  congre ss  willi ng  to  ra id yo u r So cial S ecurityand t a x you for a me d al that they' r en o tw illi ngto pay forthem s elve s? M e an whi l e, th ey ha ve al ucrative pension pl an  in wh ich R on Paul refus es to part a k e . If you  use th e  Internet, you  candelineatet hese poi nts.But if y ou get al l your inf orm ati onfro m th e major outle t s , yo u' ll hear  "R on Paul  ha tes  Ro saPa rks".


This art ic le  a ls o e viden c es thisph eno me non . Its ays th at Pa ul b la me d  th e attac k so n  9/1 1on  Ame ric an  fore ignp oli cy. Tha t was a d ema g ogic  s im plifica tion of his s ta tement. It  w asfirstm i sconstru ed by the moderator att he deba te,  then  byGiuliani,  an d nowSea n  Hanni ty and  Bill  O 'Re i l ey. B i l lMah er  corrected C hri s Dod dabou t this,  "Excuse me Senato r , b ut that is ju stwhat t he  Re p ub l ica ns att h e debate were t rying to d o, th ey were tr y ing  t o say t hat heblame d  Americ a for 9/1 1". Yet,he  was n ' t t alking abo ut a goo d-and-evi l  blam e -g ame t hat  infor ms  mo st of  our B u sh- era u nderst an ding o f the  w orld. He  was talking about geop olitic al ca use -and-effe ct. The  fact tha t he  is correc t a cco rding  to the 9 /11C om mis s ion r epor t , the CIA ' sdec l a ss ified intel l i g enc e, an d P a ul Wol fowi tz himself seemst o matter littl e to v ote rsw ho d on 't have the ti meto d o intern et  research.


The f ac t  is P aul ad dresse s the i s s ue s  thatAmer ica  faces. T her ei s no do ub tt hat So cial  S ecurit y is c r umbl i n g. Rogue economi sts w h o  seto utto bu ytime ca n notoverwhelmthe weightof eco nomi c wis dom tha ta syst emof  IOUs back e d by IOUs  that  the go ve rnme ntwroteto i t s elf,simp ly  ca nnot sust a i n. Th ev alu e of  thedo llar  is deter i or
 regularly_challenges the_conventional wisdom of Washington_D.C. Objectively,_his_points are_equally_valid; he pits_trade against war,_low taxes against corporate_welfare, lower grocery_prices_against agriculture subsidies. But again, the common assumption that politicians succumb to the whims_of_Washington can_only_be_overcome by researching the theories_that underlie his beliefs. Why,_for instance,_was he the only Congressman who opposed casting_a_posthumous gold medal_for Rosa Parks? It turns out, he wasn't opposed_to casting the medal per se,_"Rosa Parks is_a_hero_of mine...I believe in_civil disobedience", he said. Instead, he_offered to help pay for it_with his own money and encouraged other_Congressmen to do the same. They_would not.



Paul makes an excellent_point here:_Why is congress willing to_raid your Social_Security and_tax you for_a medal that they're not willing_to pay for_themselves? Meanwhile, they have a lucrative_pension_plan in which_Ron_Paul_refuses to_partake. If you_use_the Internet,_you_can delineate these points. But if_you_get all your information from the major_outlets, you'll hear "Ron_Paul_hates Rosa Parks".



This article_also evidences this phenomenon. It_says that Paul blamed the attacks_on 9/11_on American_foreign policy. That was a demagogic simplification of his statement. It_was first misconstrued by the moderator_at the debate, then_by Giuliani,_and_now Sean Hannity_and_Bill O'Reiley._Bill Maher corrected Chris Dodd about this,_"Excuse me_Senator, but that is just what_the Republicans at the_debate_were trying to do, they were_trying to say that he blamed_America for 9/11". Yet, he_wasn't_talking_about a good-and-evil blame-game that_informs most of our Bush-era understanding_of the world._He was talking about geopolitical cause-and-effect. The_fact_that he is correct according to_the_9/11 Commission report, the CIA's declassified_intelligence,_and_Paul Wolfowitz himself seems to_matter little to voters who don't_have the time to do internet research.



The fact is_Paul addresses the_issues that America faces. There_is_no_doubt that Social Security is crumbling. Rogue economists who set_out to_buy time cannot_overwhelm the weight of economic wisdom that a system of_IOUs backed by IOUs that the government_wrote to itself, simply cannot sustain. The value of the dollar_is deterior