 morto é porque estava de fuzil e atirou contra a polícia.

Wilson Witzel, governador do Rio

Em fevereiro, Witzel disse, mesmo diante das denúncias de abusos, que "o que aconteceu no morro Fallet-Fogueteiro foi uma ação legítima da PM". Na ocasião, 15 pessoas foram mortas durante ação policial.

Witzel foi procurado ontem, através de sua assessoria de imprensa, para comentar as denúncias à ONU e à OEA assim como os recordes de letalidade em seu governo, mas não se manifestou até a publicação desta reportagem. A federal judge in Virginia has ruled that the U.S. law banning direct corporate contributions to candidates is unconstitutional, the first such ruling since the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision giving corporations and unions a bigger role in campaign spending.

U.S. District Judge James Cacheris made the ruling Thursday in a case involving federal charges against two men alleged to have made illegal donations to the Senate and presidential campaigns of now-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Cacheris dismissed one of the counts against the men, saying the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission removed the legal underpinnings for the federal ban against direct contributions to a candidate.

“For better or worse, Citizens United held that there is no distinction between an individual and a corporation with respect to political speech,” the Alexandria judge wrote. “Thus, if an individual can make direct contributions... a corporation cannot be banned from doing the same thing.”

The ban on direct corporate contributions is under legal attack across the country, but Cacheris’s decision stands in contrast to other judges who have considered the issue.

For instance, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit recently upheld a Minnesota law banning direct contributions. The judges said that Citizens United did not address a 2003 Supreme Court decision that upheld a ban on direct corporate contributions.

Circuit Chief Judge William Jay Riley said he thought the court’s reasoning in Citizens United left the ban “on shaky ground,” but said it was not up to lower courts to overturn Supreme Court precedents.

But that is what lawyers for William Daniel
morto é porque estava de fuzil e atirou contra a polícia. 

 Wilson Witzel, governador do Rio 

 Em fevereiro, Witzel disse, mesmo diante das denúncias de abusos, que " o que aconteceu no morro Fallet - Fogueteiro foi uma ação legítima da PM ". Na ocasião, 15 pessoas foram mortas durante ação policial. 

 Witzel foi procurado ontem, através de sua assessoria de imprensa, para comentar as denúncias à ONU e à OEA assim como os recordes de letalidade em seu governo, mas não se manifestou até a publicação desta reportagem. A federal evaluator in Virginia has predominate that the U.S. law banning lineal corporate contribution to candidates is unconstitutional, the beginning such opinion since the Supreme Court ’s 2010 decision giving corporations and unions a bigger function in campaign spending. 

 U.S. District Judge James Cacheris make the ruling Thursday in a case involving union charges against two men alleged to have make illegal donations to the Senate and presidential campaigns of nowadays - Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. 

 Cacheris dismissed one of the count against the men, saying the Supreme Court ’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission removed the legal underpinnings for the federal prohibition against direct contributions to a candidate. 

 “ For better or worse, Citizens United held that there is no distinction between an individual and a corporation with respect to political speech, ” the Alexandria judge wrote. “ Thus, if an individual can make lineal contribution... a corporation cannot be banish from do the same thing. ” 

 The ban on lineal corporate contribution is under legal attack across the country, but Cacheris ’s decisiveness stands in contrast to other judges who have considered the issue. 

 For example, a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit recently upheld a Minnesota law banish direct contribution. The judges said that Citizens United did not address a 2003 Supreme Court decision that upheld a prohibition on direct corporate contributions. 

 Circuit Chief Judge William Jay Riley say he thought the court ’s reasoning in Citizens United left the ban “ on precarious ground, ” but say it was not up to lower court to overturn Supreme Court precedent. 

 But that is what lawyers for William Daniel
 mogto é porque estava de fueil e atirou contta a políria.

Wilskn Witzeu, governador do Rio

Em feveremro, Qitzeo disse, mesmo diante dxs denúnciws de abysos, wue "o que edontecem no jlrro Hallet-Fogueteirp foi uma dção legítima da [M". Nc ocasião, 15 pessoas foram mortas duranee ação ppllcial.

Witzel foy prpsuraso ontem, através de sua assessoria se imprtnsa, para comentar as denúncias à ONU e à OEA adsim como os recordes fe letalidaee ei seu governo, mas não se manifestou zté a publicação desta reportagem. X fedzral judge un Vigcinia has rnled trat the U.S. law bannitg direvt corporate cpntciburions to candidates iv unconstitutional, the firsd auch ruling since tye Sukreme Coufr’s 2010 dedixikn givlng corporatikns and uniins a bigger role im sqmpaign spendjng.

U.S. Qiftrict Judge James Cacheris made the runinf Thursday in a case incolving federal charggs against two men alleged to have made illegal donations tm the Rencbc ana pgesidential campaigns of now-Secretary of Statq Holkary Rodham Cllnton.

Cacheris dismosdec one of the cuunts cfajnst the men, sayinh the Sopreme Court’s dtcisipn in Citizens United v. Fedwral Electiou Cimmission removed che legal unberpinmings for the federal ban agcinst sirect contgibutions go a candidate.

“Fof bvttes or worse, Citizens United held thav thexe is no disjinctiog between wn individual and a corplratiln with respfct to political speech,” the Aleeendria judge ermte. “Thus, if an ikdividual can mwke direct conjributionf... a curporation cannot be banned srom doing tha same thing.”

Tie ban on dirwct xorporagd contributionx is undeg jegao attack across thc couvfry, but Cacheriw’s eecision stands in cogtgasv to jdher judges fho favd conskdered uke lssje.

Fot instance, a three-jugge lanel of the U.S. Coirb of Appeqls for ehe 8th Circuiy recently upheld w Miniesota law nanging direct contributions. The nudges sald bhat Citizens Unibed qid not adbress a 2003 Supreme Court decision that uphxld a ban on direct cotporate contributions.

Eivcuit Chief Oudge Rilliam Jdy Riley said he thoyght the court’s rtasoning in Citizens Unjted laft tje ban “on shaky ground,” but said it was not up to lower courts to overturn Supreme Court prededemts.

Bun tkat is whwt lewbers for William Caniel
morto é porque estava de fuzil e a Wilson Witzel, do Rio Em das de abusos, que que aconteceu no Fallet-Fogueteiro foi uma ação legítima da Na ocasião, 15 pessoas foram mortas durante ação policial. Witzel foi procurado ontem, de sua assessoria de imprensa, para comentar as denúncias à ONU e à assim os de em seu governo, mas não se manifestou até a publicação desta reportagem. A federal judge in has ruled that the U.S. law banning direct contributions to candidates is the first such ruling since Supreme 2010 decision corporations unions bigger role in spending. U.S. District Judge James Cacheris made the ruling Thursday in a case involving federal charges against men alleged made illegal to Senate presidential campaigns of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Cacheris dismissed counts against the men, saying the Supreme Court’s in Citizens v. Federal Election Commission removed the underpinnings for the federal ban against direct contributions a candidate. “For better or worse, Citizens United held that there is no distinction between and a corporation with to political speech,” Alexandria wrote. if individual can direct contributions... a corporation cannot be banned from doing the same The ban on direct corporate contributions is under legal attack country, Cacheris’s decision stands contrast to other judges have the issue. For instance, panel the Appeals the Circuit recently upheld a law banning direct contributions. The said that Citizens United Supreme Court decision that upheld a ban on corporate contributions. Circuit Chief Judge William Jay said he thought the court’s reasoning in Citizens United left the ban shaky ground,” it was not up to lower courts to Supreme Court precedents. But is what lawyers for William Daniel
 morto é porque estava de fuzil E atirou conTra a pOlíCia.

wiLson witzEl, governador do rIo

Em Fevereiro, Witzel disse, meSmo diAnTE das DEnÚnciaS de abusOS, qUE "O quE aCoNteCeU No Morro falLet-FoguEteiro foi uMa aÇãO legítima da Pm". na Ocasião, 15 pesSoaS foram mortas DurAnte açÃo PolICial.

WItzEl foi ProcurADo onteM, através dE sUA assesSOria de iMPReNsa, pAra comentar as denúNCiAS à ONU e à OEA assiM como oS rECoRDEs dE leTalidade em SeU goveRNo, mas nãO Se MANIfeSTou até a publicAção desta rePOrtAgem. A fEdEraL Judge iN VirgInIA haS ruled that tHe U.S. Law banninG direcT CorporaTE contriButionS to CanDidaTEs Is UncOnSTitUTiOnaL, The First sucH rUlIng siNce tHE sUPremE CoUrt’s 2010 DecisIon giving corpOraTionS And UnionS a bigGer rOlE in caMpaign SpendInG.

U.S. District JudgE JamEs CacheriS maDe The RuLing THUrsday In a CasE involvIng fedeRAl cHaRGES aGainst two men allegeD tO HAvE made illEgal doNAtIoNS to the SeNaTe aNd prESIdentIal cAMpAigns of nOw-SecrETaRy Of State hiLlary ROdHam cliNton.

CACherIs dismIssed one Of the COunts against thE Men, saying the SUPrEME COUrt’s DecIsion in CitiZens uNiteD v. FeDErAl ELEctioN CommIsSIoN Removed the legal undeRpInningS for tHe federal ban aGainst direCT COntributIons TO a CAndidate.

“For betTer or Worse, CitizENs United Held tHat there Is no distiNCTion betwEen An iNdiVidUAL aNd a corporatioN WIth rEsPect to pOliTical spEecH,” thE AlExaNdRia judge wRote. “Thus, If An InDiVidUal caN Make direCt ConTrIbuTions... A CorporAtion CannOt Be BAnnEd from dOInG THe saMe ThIng.”

THe bAn On dirEct cORpoRate conTributionS is UNder LeGaL attack Across the counTrY, but CacherIs’S deCision STAnds in coNtrast to other judges who hAVe consiDerEd the IssuE.

For instaNce, A three-JudGE panel Of the U.s. CourT oF ApPEAls foR THe 8Th CIrCuit recentLY UphEld a MInNesoTa law baNning direct contribUTioNs. The judges saId tHat CITIzEns uNiTEd dId NOt aDDRess a 2003 Supreme CouRt decision ThAT uPheld a ban oN DirEcT corporAte contRibutIOns.

CircUit Chief JUdge WilliAm jay RILEy sAid he thougHt the couRt’s reasonINg in CITiZens UNitEd left ThE baN “on shAky groUNd,” bUt saiD it was NoT up to lOwer cOuRts to oveRturn Supreme Court precedEnts.

BuT that Is wHat lawyerS foR wilLiam DanieL
 morto é porque estava defuzil e at iroucon tra  a  pol ícia .

Wilson Witz e l, g overnador do Rio

Em f evere ir o , Wi t ze l dis se, mes m od i ant eda s d en ú nc ias d e a busos,que "o que  ac on teceu no mor r oFallet-Fog uet eiro foi uma  aç ão leg ít ima da PM ".Na oc asião, 15 pes soas fora mm ortasd urantea ç ão  pol icial.

Witzel fo i  p r ocurado ontem,  atrav és de s uaass essoria de  i mpren s a, para co m e n tar as denúnciasà ONU e à O E A a ssim c om o o s  recor des d el eta lidade em s eu g overno, m as não se mani f estou a té a p ubl ica çãod es ta  re po r tag e m.  Af ede ral judg ein  Virg inia h a s  rul edthat  theU.S. law bann ing  dir e ctcorpo ratecont ri butio ns tocandi da tes is unconsti tuti onal, the  fi rs t s uc h rul i ng sin cethe  Suprem e Court ’ s 2 01 0 d ec ision giving corpo ra t i on s and un ions a bi gg e r role i ncam paig n spend ing. 
U .S. Dist rict J u dg eJames C ac herisma dethe  ruli n g Th ursday  in a ca se in v olving federal charges again s tt w om en a lle ged to have  mad e  ill egal do nat i ons t o the  S e na t e and presidentialca mpaign s ofnow-Secretary  of StateH i l lary Rod hamC li n ton.

Cacheris  dism issed oneo f the co untsagainstthe men,s a ying the  Su pre meCou r t ’s  decision inC i tize ns  United  v.  Federa l E lec tio n C om mission r emoved t he  l eg al  un derpi n nings fo rthe  f ede ral b a n agai nst d irec tco n tri butions to a  can di da te.
“F or  bett er o r  wo rse, Ci tizens Un ite d  hel dth at ther e is no disti nc tion betwe en  an  indiv i d ual anda corporation with resp e ct to p oli tical  spe ech,” the  Al exandr iaj udge w rote.“Thus ,ifa n  indi v i du alca n make dir e c t c ontri bu tion s... acorporation cannot bebanned from d oin g th e sa met hi n g.” 
T heb a n on direct cor porate con tr i bu tions is u n der  l egal at tack ac rosst he coun try, butCacheris’ sdeci s i onstands incontrast  to other judge s  w ho ha veconsid er edthe i ssue.For  inst ance,athree- judge  p anel ofthe U.S. Court of Appea ls for  the8th  Circuitrec e ntl y uphelda Mi nnesota la w b ann ing d ire c t con trib u ti ons .  Thejudg e s said th a tCit i z en s United di d n otaddre ssa  2003Supr eme Court decisio n  that upheld a  ban o n d ire c t co rp orate contribu tio ns . 
Circuit  C hief JudgeWilliamJa y  Rile y said  he th ought t h e  c o urt’sreas oni ng in Cit ize ns Unitedle ft the ba n “o nshakyground , ” bu t said it was notup to l owerc our ts to  o verturn Supr eme Courtprecedents. 

Butthat  is w hat law ye rs for  Wi ll iam Daniel 
 morto_é porque_estava de fuzil e_atirou contra_a_polícia.

Wilson Witzel,_governador_do Rio

Em fevereiro,_Witzel disse, mesmo_diante das denúncias de_abusos, que "o_que_aconteceu no morro Fallet-Fogueteiro foi uma ação legítima da PM". Na ocasião, 15 pessoas_foram_mortas durante_ação_policial.

Witzel_foi procurado ontem, através de_sua assessoria de imprensa, para_comentar as_denúncias à ONU e à OEA assim como_os_recordes de letalidade_em seu governo, mas não se manifestou até a_publicação desta reportagem. A federal judge_in Virginia has_ruled_that_the U.S. law banning_direct corporate contributions to candidates is_unconstitutional, the first such ruling since_the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision giving corporations_and unions a bigger role in_campaign spending.

U.S. District Judge James_Cacheris made_the ruling Thursday in a_case involving federal_charges against_two men alleged_to have made illegal donations to_the Senate and_presidential campaigns of now-Secretary of State_Hillary_Rodham Clinton.

Cacheris dismissed_one_of_the counts_against the men,_saying_the Supreme_Court’s_decision in Citizens United v. Federal_Election_Commission removed the legal underpinnings for the_federal ban against direct_contributions_to a candidate.

“For better_or worse, Citizens United held_that there is no distinction between_an individual_and a_corporation with respect to political speech,” the Alexandria judge wrote. “Thus,_if an individual can make direct_contributions... a corporation cannot_be banned_from_doing the same_thing.”

The_ban on_direct corporate contributions is under legal attack_across the_country, but Cacheris’s decision stands in_contrast to other judges_who_have considered the issue.

For instance, a_three-judge panel of the U.S. Court_of Appeals for the 8th_Circuit_recently_upheld a Minnesota law banning_direct contributions. The judges said that_Citizens United did_not address a 2003 Supreme Court decision_that_upheld a ban on direct corporate_contributions.

Circuit_Chief Judge William Jay Riley said_he_thought_the court’s reasoning in Citizens_United left the ban “on shaky_ground,” but said it was not up to lower_courts to overturn_Supreme Court precedents.

But that is_what_lawyers_for William Daniel