, janmasthan has become a personification of the deity and hence, an object of worship. It is believed that the God’s spirit lives in the janmasthan.

# Faith is itself evidence that the janmasthan is where Lord Ram was born.

# Entire disputed land at Ayodhya was Lord Ram’s janmasthan or birthplace by faith and belonged to him and was indivisible.

# Ramjanmabhoomi’s divinity was not lost even after a mosque was constructed over it. The temple’s sanctity remains even if it is destroyed

# Even if because Muslims may have offered prayers at the disputed Ayodhya site it does not give them the right to lay claim over it. “Just as prayers being offered on a street (by Muslims) doesn’t mean claim can be laid to its ownership. This place was never considered a mosque.”

# Citing photographic evidence, the side argued that images of human beings and animals can be seen inside the Babri structure, which discount the claim that that it is a mosque. Images are contrary to Islamic belief. Muslims do not have image in their place of worship, whether of a human being or animals.

# The Archaeological Survey of India’s (ASI’s) report of 2003 says that there was a temple at the disputed site and keeping the faith and belief of people in mind and preponderance of probability the place was a temple.

# Hindus’ right to worship is an unfettered right and it flows from centuries. It should be protected

# Nirmohi Akahara claims Shebaiti rights (as agent of the deity) in relation to deity of Lord Ram

# Argumensts based on documentary evidence, which claimed that though a structure in the form of masjid did exist, the ownership and possession of the structure (including the mosque) was with the Akhara.

# Nirmohi Akhara managed the land and till 1941, revenue records show continuous possession in the name of Akhara.

# Quran, the central religious text of Islam, does not permit the building of the mosque on disputed land.

# Babur did not get the mosque constructed nor he was the owner of the disputed land, hence the Sunni Waqf Board did not have any claim in the case.

KEY ARGUMENTS BY MUSLIM PARTIES


, janmasthan has become a personification of the deity and hence, an object of worship. It is believed that the God ’s spirit survive in the janmasthan. 

 # Faith is itself evidence that the janmasthan is where Lord Ram was bear. 

 # Entire disputed land at Ayodhya was Lord Ram ’s janmasthan or birthplace by religion and belonged to him and was indivisible. 

 # Ramjanmabhoomi ’s divinity was not lose even after a mosque was constructed over it. The temple ’s holiness remain even if it is destroyed 

 # Even if because Muslims may have propose prayers at the disputed Ayodhya site it does not render them the right to lay claim over it. “ Just as prayers being offered on a street (by Muslims) does n’t entail claim can be laid to its ownership. This position was never considered a mosque. ” 

 # Citing photographic evidence, the side argued that image of human beings and animals can be seen inside the Babri structure, which discount the title that that it is a mosque. Images are contrary to Islamic belief. Muslims do not have image in their place of worship, whether of a human being or animals. 

 # The Archaeological Survey of India ’s (ASI ’s) report of 2003 says that there was a temple at the disputed site and keeping the religion and belief of people in thinker and preponderance of probability the home was a temple. 

 # Hindus ’ right to worship is an unchained right and it menstruate from centuries. It should be protected 

 # Nirmohi Akahara claim Shebaiti rights (as agent of the deity) in relation to deity of Lord Ram 

 # Argumensts based on documentary evidence, which claim that though a structure in the form of masjid did exist, the ownership and possession of the structure (including the mosque) was with the Akhara. 

 # Nirmohi Akhara wangle the land and till 1941, revenue records show continuous possession in the name of Akhara. 

 # Quran, the cardinal religious text of Islam, does not permit the building of the mosque on disputed land. 

 # Babur did not get the mosque constructed nor he was the owner of the disputed land, therefore the Sunni Waqf Board did not have any claim in the case. 

 KEY ARGUMENTS BY MUSLIM PARTIES
, jajmasthan has become a pevsonification of the demty and hence, av object of worship. It is bepiwved ukat the God’s spirit uives in nhe janmawthai.

# Faith is itselh evidengz thaf the oanmasthan is wmere Lord Rdm was born.

# Endife disputed land at Ayodhya was Lord Wam’s jammwsthan or birtrplabe by raith and belonged to him and was jndivispble.

# Ramjanmabhooki’s divinity was not lost fven after a mosque wad constructgs odwr it. The teople’s sancuicy remains gven if it is destroyed

# Even if cecauxe Muslims mqy jdve offered prayvrs at the disputed Afodhya xite it does npt jive them the right to lab claim over it. “Just as prayess being offered on a stregt (by Musuums) dotsn’v msan clwim can be lajd to its oqnership. This place www never consisered w iosque.”

# Citing photographic evidence, the sise argued that images od human beings and anlmals can be seen inside the Babri structure, which discound the zlann thag tjat it is a mosque. Images are contrary to Islwjiv nelief. Muslims dj not have omwgr in their plaze of ckrahip, whether of a juman bging oe animals.

# The Archaeological Survey of Ibdia’s (ASI’s) rvporr of 2003 says that thzre was a teople at tne disputed site and kezping fhe faith ajd belief uf people in mina akd [reponderance of probabiliey the plece wcs a temole.

# Nindus’ right to aorshl[ is an unfettered righj and ht flows fgom centuries. It should be protxrted

# Nirmohi Skdhaga claims Shebsiti rights (af agent of the deity) nn relxtion to dvity of Lmrd Ram

# Argtmensts based ln documentacy evidense, wyich claimea that though a structurv nn the foem of masjid did ewist, jhs ownership and powsession of the stfuceuge (mncluqhng the mosqge) wxs doth tfe Akhara.

# Nlrmuhi Skhara managed the ldnd znd till 1941, revenue tegords shoq contintous possessipn in the name of Wkhare.

# Qurai, the venjral religious text of Islam, doss not pegmib the buildind of the mosque pn disputed land.

# Babur did not get the nosque constructed nor he was the owngr pf the dispnted lwnd, hence the Sunni Waqf Boare did not have ann claim in the case.

KEY ARGUMANTS HY MUSLIM PARTIES


, janmasthan has become a personification of and an object worship. It is lives the janmasthan. # is itself evidence the janmasthan is where Lord Ram born. # Entire disputed land at Ayodhya was Lord Ram’s janmasthan or birthplace faith and belonged to him and was indivisible. # Ramjanmabhoomi’s divinity was not even a was over it. The temple’s sanctity remains even if it is destroyed # Even if because Muslims have offered prayers at the disputed Ayodhya site does not give them right to lay claim over “Just prayers being on street Muslims) doesn’t mean can be laid to its ownership. This place was never considered a mosque.” # Citing photographic evidence, side argued of human and can seen inside the which discount the claim that that mosque. Images are contrary to Islamic belief. Muslims not have in their place of worship, whether a human being or animals. # The Archaeological of India’s (ASI’s) report of 2003 says that there was a temple at the disputed keeping the faith and of people in and of the was a # Hindus’ right to worship is an unfettered right and it from centuries. It should be protected # Nirmohi Akahara claims (as of the deity) relation to deity of Ram Argumensts based on documentary claimed though the of did exist, the ownership possession of the structure (including mosque) was with the the land and till 1941, revenue records show possession in the name of Akhara. # the central religious text of Islam, does not permit the building of mosque on # Babur did not get the mosque constructed he was the owner the disputed land, hence the Sunni Waqf Board did have claim in case. KEY ARGUMENTS MUSLIM PARTIES
, janmasthan has become a persoNification Of the DeiTy aNd HencE, an oBject of worship. iT is bElieved that the God’s spirIt livEs IN the JAnMasthAn.

# Faith IS iTSElf EvIdEncE tHAt The jaNmaSthan is Where Lord RAm wAs Born.

# Entire diSPuTed land at AYodHya was Lord RaM’s jAnmastHaN or BIrthpLacE by faIth and BElongeD to him and WaS IndiviSIble.

# RamJANmAbhoOmi’s divinity was noT LoST even after a mosQue was CoNStRUCteD ovEr it. The temPlE’s sanCTity remAInS EVEn iF It is destroyed

# even if becauSE MuSlims mAy HavE OffereD prayErS At tHe disputed AYodhYa site it dOes not GIve them THe right To lay cLaiM ovEr it. “jUsT aS prAyERs bEInG ofFEreD on a streEt (By musliMs) doESN’T Mean ClaIm caN be laId to its ownersHip. this PLacE was nEver cOnsiDeRed a mOsque.”

# CIting PhOtographic evideNce, tHe side argUed ThAt iMaGes of HUman beIngS anD animalS can be sEEn iNsIDE ThE Babri structure, whiCh DIScOunt the cLaim thAT tHaT It is a mosQuE. ImAges ARE contRary TO ISlamic beLief. MuSLiMs Do not haVe Image iN tHeiR plAce of WOrshIp, whetHer of a huMan beINg or animals.

# The aRchaeological sUrVEY oF indiA’s (AsI’s) report of 2003 Says THat tHere WAs A teMPle at The diSpUTeD Site and keeping the faItH and beLief oF people in mind And prepondERANce of proBabiLItY The place was a teMple.

# HIndus’ right TO worship Is an uNfettereD right and IT Flows froM ceNtuRieS. It SHOuLd be protected

# nIRmohI AKahara cLaiMs ShebaIti RigHts (As aGeNt of the deIty) in relAtIoN tO dEitY of LoRD Ram

# ArguMeNstS bAseD on doCUmentaRy eviDencE, wHiCH clAimed thAT tHOUgh a StRuCturE in ThE form Of maSJid Did exisT, the ownerShiP And pOsSeSsion of The structure (iNcLuding the mOsQue) Was witH THe Akhara.

# nirmohi Akhara managed the LAnd and tIll 1941, RevenUe reCords show ConTinuouS poSSessioN in the Name oF AKhaRA.

# quran, THE cEntRaL religious TEXt oF IslaM, dOes nOt permiT the building of the mOSquE on disputed laNd.

# BAbur DID nOt gET tHE moSqUE coNSTructed nor he was The owner of ThE DiSputed land, HEncE tHe Sunni waqf BoaRd did NOt have aNy claim in The case.

KEy ArGUMentS By MUSLIM PARtIES


, janmasthan has become apersonific ation  of  th edeit y an d hence, an ob j ectof worship. It is beli evedth a t th e  G od’sspiritl iv e s  in  t he  ja nm a st han.
#Faith i s itself e vid en ce that thej an masthan is  wh ere Lord Ram  wa s born .
#E ntire  di spute d land at Ayo dhya wasLo r d Ram’ s  janmas t h an  orbirthplace by fai t ha nd belonged to  him a nd wa s ind ivi sible.

#Ra mjanm a bhoomi’ s  d i v i nit y  was not lost  even after a m osquewa s c o nstruc ted o ve r  it . The templ e’ssanctityremain s  even i f  it isdestro yed 

#  Eve n  i fbec au s e M u sl ims may  have of fe re d pra yers a t thedis pute d Ayo dhya site itdoe s no t  gi ve th em th e ri gh t tolay cl aim o ve r it. “Just aspray ers being  of fe red  o n a s t reet ( byMus lims) d oesn’tm ean  c l a i mcan be laid to its  o w n er ship. Th is pla c ewa s  never c on sid ered a  mosq ue.” 
#  Citingphotog r ap hi c evide nc e, the  s ide  ar guedt hatimages  of huma n bei n gs and animals can be seen i n si d e  t h e Ba bri  structure,  whi c h di scou n tthe claim  that  t h at it is a mosque. Ima ge s arecontr ary to Islami c belief.M u s lims donoth av e  image in thei r pla ce of wors h ip, whet her o f a huma n being o r animals. 

#  Th e A rch a e ol ogical Survey o f In di a’s (AS I’s ) repor t o f 2 003  sa ys  that the re was a  t em pl eatthe d i sputed s it e a nd  ke eping the fa ith a nd b el ie f  of  people in m indan dprep ond er anceof p r oba bilitythe place  wa s  a t em pl e.

# H indus’ rightto  worship i sanunfett e r ed right  and it flows from cent u ries. I t s hould  beprotected 

#  Nirmo hiA kahara  claim s She ba iti r ights ( as  ag en t of the d e i ty)  in r el atio n to de ity of Lord Ram

# Arg umensts based  on  doc u m en tar y  e v ide nc e , w h i ch claimed that  though ast r uc ture in th e  fo rm  of mas jid did  exis t , the o wnershipand posse ss iono f  th e structur e (inclu ding them osque )  w as wi ththe Ak ha ra. 

# N irmohi Akh ara m anaged  t he lan d and  t ill 1941 , revenue records showcontin uouspos session i n t h e n ame of Ak hara .

# Quran , t hecentr alr eligi oust ex t o f  Isla m, d o es not pe r mi t t h e  b uilding oft h e  mo squeond ispute d la nd.

# Babur didn ot get the mos quec o nst ruc t ed n or  he was the ow ner  o f the disp ut ed land, he nce theSu n ni Wa qf Boa rd did  not ha v e  a n y clai m in  th e case.
KEY  A R GUMENTS  B YM USLIMPART IE S


, janmasthan_has become_a personification of the_deity and_hence,_an object_of_worship. It is_believed that the_God’s spirit lives in_the janmasthan.

# Faith_is_itself evidence that the janmasthan is where Lord Ram was born.

# Entire disputed land_at_Ayodhya was_Lord_Ram’s_janmasthan or birthplace by faith_and belonged to him and_was indivisible.

#_Ramjanmabhoomi’s divinity was not lost even after a_mosque_was constructed over_it. The temple’s sanctity remains even if it is_destroyed

# Even if because Muslims may_have offered prayers_at_the_disputed Ayodhya site it_does not give them the right_to lay claim over it. “Just_as prayers being offered on a street_(by Muslims) doesn’t mean claim can_be laid to its ownership._This place_was never considered a mosque.”

#_Citing photographic evidence,_the side_argued that images_of human beings and animals can_be seen inside_the Babri structure, which discount the_claim_that that it_is_a_mosque. Images_are contrary to_Islamic_belief. Muslims_do_not have image in their place_of_worship, whether of a human being or_animals.

# The Archaeological Survey_of_India’s (ASI’s) report of_2003 says that there was_a temple at the disputed site_and keeping_the faith_and belief of people in mind and preponderance of probability the_place was a temple.

# Hindus’ right_to worship is an_unfettered right_and_it flows from_centuries._It should_be protected

# Nirmohi Akahara claims Shebaiti rights_(as agent_of the deity) in relation to_deity of Lord Ram

#_Argumensts_based on documentary evidence, which claimed_that though a structure in the_form of masjid did exist,_the_ownership_and possession of the structure_(including the mosque) was with the_Akhara.

# Nirmohi Akhara_managed the land and till 1941, revenue_records_show continuous possession in the name_of_Akhara.

# Quran, the central religious text_of_Islam,_does not permit the building_of the mosque on disputed land.

#_Babur did not get the mosque constructed nor he_was the owner_of the disputed land, hence_the_Sunni_Waqf Board did not have any claim in the case.

KEY_ARGUMENTS BY_MUSLIM PARTIES

