 Sarsour, a certain Dr Ejaz Naqvi declares himself a jihadist because he blogs.

Dr Naqvi is a board member of the Islamic Scholarship Fund, whose mission is to increase “American Muslim representation in media and politics in order to improve public opinion and policy.” Which is accomplished through a collection of scholarships, grants, workshops, and internships.

Dr Naqvi is also an interfaith leader, and it shows. Dr. Naqvi’s post defending Jihad, and Linda Sarsour is like a museum of interfaith claptrap: the greater, and lesser jihad, only for defense, started by the Christians in 11th century, etc.. This branches off in the comments section into an endorsement of “Islamic science” propaganda. Finally, if you want to laugh at the irony of Muslims warning people about Jesus coming to cut them with a sword [Matthew 10:34], you can find that on Dr Naqvi’s post, as well.

All of this fits together making a larger picture of a growing number of people who want to bring to America the worst of their societies, such as jihad, and sharia.

One would think that it would obvious to Muslims like Dr. Naqvi that in any sense of the word that has importance to you as a non-Muslim, jihad means war. Muslims conduct themselves as a standing army: they wear a uniform, follow a set of regulations, and do every thing the same way, at the same time.

The Ummah,... looks too much like a military machine to pass as a peaceful society. The rules laid down by the Shariat read like a manual compiled for use in military barracks – waking up every morning to the call of a bugle, rolling up the bed, sweeping the floor, pressing the uniform, polishing the shoes, rushing for a bath, moving the body in different ways in mass drills, sharing meals in the mess-hall, drinking from a common canteen and, finally, facing the court martial for mistakes made in any part. One is amazed as well as amused when this mechanical conformity to a set pattern of external exercises is presented by the spokesmen of Islam as the very essence of universal spirituality and morality.– Calcutta petition



Dr. Naqvi’s opinion about jihad is not nearly as important as that of Yusef Qaradawi who has written extensively on the subject of jihad
Sarsour, a certain Dr Ejaz Naqvi declares himself a jihadist because he blogs. 

 Dr Naqvi is a board extremity of the Islamic Scholarship Fund, whose deputation is to increase “ American Muslim representation in media and politics in decree to better public opinion and policy. ” Which is accomplished through a solicitation of scholarships, grants, workshops, and internship. 

 Dr Naqvi is besides an interfaith leader, and it shows. Dr. Naqvi ’s mail defending Jihad, and Linda Sarsour is like a museum of interfaith claptrap: the greater, and lesser jihad, merely for defense, started by the Christians in 11th century, etc.. This branches off in the remark section into an endorsement of “ Islamic skill ” propaganda. Finally, if you want to laugh at the sarcasm of Muslims warning multitude about Jesus coming to edit them with a sword [ Matthew 10:34 ], you can find that on Dr Naqvi ’s post, as well. 

 All of this fit together making a larger picture of a growing numeral of people who want to bring to America the worst of their societies, such as jihad, and sharia. 

 One would think that it would obvious to Muslims like Dr. Naqvi that in any sense of the word that has importance to you as a non - Muslim, jihad means war. Muslims behave themselves as a standing army: they tire a uniform, adopt a set of regulations, and do every matter the same direction, at the same time. 

 The Ummah, ... look too much like a military machine to pass as a peaceful society. The rule laid down by the Shariat read like a manual compiled for use in military barracks – awaken up every morning to the call of a bugle, rolling up the bed, sweeping the floor, press the uniform, polishing the shoes, rushing for a bathtub, moving the body in different ways in aggregate drills, sharing meals in the mess - hall, drink from a common canteen and, ultimately, facing the motor hotel martial for mistakes made in any character. One is amazed as well as amused when this mechanical ossification to a set form of external exercises is portray by the spokesmen of Islam as the very essence of universal spirituality and ethical motive. – Calcutta petition 



 Dr. Naqvi ’s opinion about jihad is not about as important as that of Yusef Qaradawi who has written extensively on the subject of jihad
 Sagsour, a certain Dr Ejaz Kaqvi declares hnnself e jihadjst becajse he blogs.

Dr Naqvi is a boerd nembee of the Islamic Scholxrship Fujd, whose miswuon is to mhcrease “Ameridwn Mbsoim representajion in medid and politics iv lrder to improve public opinion and policy.” Wjich is accompjishtd ehrohgh a collection of scholarships, gdants, wmrkshops, and onternships.

Dr Naqvi is alsl an interfaith leader, and it shoqs. Dw. Naqvi’s post defending Jihad, and Ljnda Sarsour is like a museum ow intzrfaith clakceap: jhe greater, end lefser jihad, okky for defensr, started by tme Chcistuans in 11th century, etr.. This branches off yn the cokmznts section into an wneorsekent of “Kwlaoic sriehce” prlpajanda. Finalmy, if you wqnt to laugh at the iwiny of Muslima warnynd people about Jesus coming to cut them wifh a sword [Matthew 10:34], you can find that on Dr Jaqvi’s poft, as well.

All of this fits together making a largar pirtjre on a eeoaing number of people who want to bring to Amqdiva the worst of bheir societies, suvh ax jihad, and shxria.

Onz wkuld think that it would jbvioys to Musjims like Dr. Naqvi that in any wense of the qord that has impoxtance to yob as a non-Mislim, jihad means war. Mbslims conduct thfmselves zr a standing armh: tmey wear a uniform, follow a sqt of regnlatipns, and do gvery tring the swme way, at the same time.

Hhe Ulmdh,... looks tlo much like a military machine to pass as a keawefll societv. The vules laid down by the Shariaj read lihe a oanual comiiled for use in milytary barrackv – waking up xvery morging to rhe calu of a bugle, rokling up nht bed, sweeping the floor, prexsivf the uniform, piliwhing the shoes, rurhigg fpr d bath, movinc thd bucy in differtut cahs im mass drills, sharinc mezls in the mess-halk, qrinking from a sommon canteem and, finally, facijg thx courv martoal for mistakes made in any part. One is alazcd as well as amuwed when thix mechanical conformity to a set patteri of external exercises is presented by thg skokesmen of Ixlam ws the vesy essence of univerwal spirituality snd morality.– Calcutta petithon



Dr. Naqvi’s opinion about jihad is not nearly as important as that of Yusef Qqradawm rho has wriften extetsnveky on ehe dnbject of jihad
Sarsour, a certain Dr Ejaz Naqvi declares jihadist he blogs. Naqvi is a Scholarship whose mission is increase “American Muslim in media and politics in order improve public opinion and policy.” Which is accomplished through a collection of scholarships, workshops, and internships. Dr Naqvi is also an interfaith leader, and it shows. Naqvi’s defending and Sarsour is like a museum of interfaith claptrap: the greater, and lesser jihad, only for defense, by the Christians in 11th century, etc.. This off in the comments into an endorsement of “Islamic propaganda. if you to at irony of Muslims people about Jesus coming to cut them with a sword [Matthew 10:34], you can find that on Naqvi’s post, All of fits making larger picture of number of people who want to the worst of their societies, such as jihad, sharia. One think that it would obvious to like Dr. Naqvi that in any sense of word that has importance to you as a non-Muslim, jihad means war. Muslims conduct themselves standing army: they wear uniform, follow a of and every the same at the same time. The Ummah,... looks too much like a machine to pass as a peaceful society. The rules laid the read like a compiled for use in barracks waking up every morning call a the sweeping floor, pressing the uniform, the shoes, rushing for a moving the body in sharing meals in the mess-hall, drinking from a canteen and, finally, facing the court martial mistakes made in any part. One is amazed as well as amused this mechanical a set pattern of external exercises is presented the spokesmen of Islam the very essence of universal spirituality and morality.– Calcutta Dr. opinion about is not nearly important as that Yusef Qaradawi who extensively on subject jihad
 Sarsour, a certain Dr Ejaz NaqvI declares hImselF a jIhaDiSt beCausE he blogs.

Dr NaqvI Is a bOard member of the Islamic scholArSHip FUNd, Whose Mission IS tO INcrEaSe “ameRiCAn musliM rePresentAtion in medIa aNd Politics in orDEr To improve pUblIc opinion and PolIcy.” WhiCh Is aCComplIshEd thrOugh a cOLlectiOn of scholArSHips, grANts, workSHOpS, and Internships.

Dr NaqvI Is ALso an interfaitH leadeR, aND iT SHowS. Dr. naqvi’s post DeFendiNG Jihad, aND LINDA SaRSour is like a muSeum of interFAitH claptRaP: thE GreateR, and lEsSEr jIhad, only for DefeNse, starteD by the cHristiaNS in 11th ceNtury, eTc.. THis BranCHeS oFf iN tHE coMMeNts SEctIon into aN eNdOrsemEnt oF “iSLAmic SciEnce” PropaGanda. Finally, iF yoU wanT To lAugh aT the iRony Of musliMs warnIng peOpLe about Jesus comIng tO cut them wIth A sWorD [MAttheW 10:34], You can FinD thAt on Dr NAqvi’s poST, as WeLL.

aLl Of this fits together MaKINg A larger pIcture OF a GrOWing numbEr Of pEoplE WHo wanT to bRInG to AmeriCa the wORsT oF their sOcIeties, SuCh aS jiHad, anD SharIa.

One wOuld thinK that IT would obvious tO muslims like Dr. nAqVI ThAT in aNy sEnse of the woRd thAT has ImpoRTaNce TO you aS a non-muSLiM, Jihad means war. MuslimS cOnduct ThemsElves as a standIng army: theY WEAr a unifoRm, foLLoW A set of regulatiOns, anD do every thINg the samE way, aT the same Time.

The UmMAH,... looks toO muCh lIke A miLITaRy machine to paSS As a pEaCeful soCieTy. The ruLes LaiD doWn bY tHe Shariat Read like A mAnUaL cOmpIled fOR use in miLiTarY bArrAcks – wAKing up Every MornInG tO The Call of a BUgLE, RollInG uP the Bed, SwEepinG the FLooR, pressiNg the unifOrm, POlisHiNg The shoeS, rushing for a bAtH, moving the BoDy iN diffeRENt ways in Mass drills, sharing meals iN The mess-HalL, drinKing From a commOn cAnteen And, FInally, Facing The coUrT maRTIal foR MIsTakEs Made in any pART. OnE is amAzEd as Well as aMused when this mechaNIcaL conformity to A seT patTERn Of eXTeRNal ExERciSES is presented by tHe spokesmeN oF isLam as the veRY esSeNce of unIversal SpiriTUality aNd moralitY.– Calcutta PeTitiON



dr. NAqvi’s opiniOn about jIhad is not NEarly AS iMportAnt As that Of yusEf QarAdawi wHO haS writTen extEnSively On the SuBject of jIhad
 Sarsour, a certain Dr Eja z Naqvi de clare s h ims el f ajiha dist because h e  blo gs.

Dr Naqvi is a boa rd me mb e r of th e Isl amic Sc h ol a r shi pFu nd,  w h os e mis sio n is to  increase“Am er ican Muslimr ep resentatio n i n media andpol iticsin  or d er to  im prove  publi c  opini on and po li c y.” Wh i ch is a c c om plis hed through a col l ec t ion of scholar ships,  g r an t s , w ork shops, and  i ntern s hips.
D rN a q vii s also an int erfaith lea d er,  and i tsho w s. Dr.  Naqv i’ s  po st defendin g Ji had, andLindaS arsouri s likea muse umofinte r fa it h c la p tra p :the gre ater, an dle sserjiha d , o nlyfor  def ense,  started by t heChri s tia ns in  11th  cen tu ry, e tc.. T his b ra nches off in th e co mments se cti on  in to  an e n dorsem ent  of  “Islam ic scie n ce”  p r o p ag anda. Finally, ifyo u wa nt to la ugh at th ei rony ofMu sli ms w a r ningpeop l eabout Je sus co m in gto cutth em wit ha s wor d [Ma t thew  10:34 ], you c an fi n d that on Dr N a qvi’s post, a s  w e l l. 
All  of  this fitstoge t hermaki n ga l a rgerpictu re of a growing number of  p eoplewho w ant to bringto America t h e worstof t h ei r  societies, su ch as  jihad, an d  sharia. 

One  would t hink that i t wouldobv iou s t o M u s li ms like Dr. N a q vi t ha t in an y s ense of  th e w ord  th at  has impo rtance t oyo uas  anon-M u slim, ji ha d m ea nswar.M uslims  cond uctth em s elv es as a st a n ding  a rm y: t hey  w ear a  uni f orm , follo w a set o f r e gula ti on s, anddo every thin gthe same w ay , a t thes a me time. 

The Ummah,... looks t o o muchlik e a m ilit ary machi neto pas s a s  a pea cefulsocie ty . T h e  rule s la iddo wn by theS h ari at re ad  lik e a man ual compiled for u s e i n military ba rra cks– wa kin g  u p  ev er y  mo r n ing to the call  of a bugl e, ro lling up t h e b ed , sweep ing the  floo r , press ing the u niform, p ol ishi n g  th e shoes, r ushing f or a bath ,  movi n gthe b ody  in di ff ere nt wa ys inm ass  dril ls, sh ar ing me als i nthe mess -hall, drinking from acommon  cant een  and, fin all y , f acing the  cou rt martial  fo r m istak esm ade i n an y  p art .  Oneis a m azed as w e ll  as a mu sed when th i s mec hanic alc onform ityto a set patterno f external exe rcis e s  is  pr e sent ed  by the spokes men  o f Islam as  t he very ess ence ofun i versa l spir ituali ty andm o ra l ity.–Calc utt a petitio n

D r. Naqv i’ so pinion  abo ut  jihad  is no t  nea r l y as important a s tha t of Yu s efQarad aw i who h a s wr itten exte nsively onthe su bjec t ofjihad
 Sarsour,_a certain_Dr Ejaz Naqvi declares_himself a_jihadist_because he_blogs.

Dr_Naqvi is a_board member of_the Islamic Scholarship Fund,_whose mission is_to_increase “American Muslim representation in media and politics in order to improve public opinion_and_policy.” Which_is_accomplished_through a collection of scholarships,_grants, workshops, and internships.

Dr Naqvi_is also_an interfaith leader, and it shows. Dr. Naqvi’s_post_defending Jihad, and_Linda Sarsour is like a museum of interfaith claptrap:_the greater, and lesser jihad, only_for defense, started_by_the_Christians in 11th century,_etc.. This branches off in the_comments section into an endorsement of_“Islamic science” propaganda. Finally, if you want_to laugh at the irony of_Muslims warning people about Jesus_coming to_cut them with a sword_[Matthew 10:34], you_can find_that on Dr_Naqvi’s post, as well.

All of this_fits together making_a larger picture of a growing_number_of people who_want_to_bring to_America the worst_of_their societies,_such_as jihad, and sharia.

One would think_that_it would obvious to Muslims like Dr._Naqvi that in any_sense_of the word that_has importance to you as_a non-Muslim, jihad means war. Muslims_conduct themselves_as a_standing army: they wear a uniform, follow a set of regulations,_and do every thing the same_way, at the same_time.

The Ummah,..._looks_too much like_a_military machine_to pass as a peaceful society. The_rules laid_down by the Shariat read like_a manual compiled for_use_in military barracks – waking up_every morning to the call of_a bugle, rolling up the_bed,_sweeping_the floor, pressing the uniform,_polishing the shoes, rushing for a_bath, moving the_body in different ways in mass drills,_sharing_meals in the mess-hall, drinking from_a_common canteen and, finally, facing the_court_martial_for mistakes made in any_part. One is amazed as well_as amused when this mechanical conformity to a set_pattern of external_exercises is presented by the_spokesmen_of_Islam as the very essence of universal spirituality and morality.–_Calcutta petition



Dr._Naqvi’s opinion about_jihad is not nearly as important as that of Yusef_Qaradawi who has written extensively on the_subject of jihad