 use evidence to better the system that would keep us most safe what would we see the political aspirants’ campaign hardest about?

More use of therapy and rehabilitation earlier in sentences and keeping people on parole longer because it incentivises better behaviour.

We would see parties campaigning on more education in prisons and teaching to more appropriate learning styles to prevent young people not learning in classrooms and going on to create victims when they should be in school.

Politicians would campaign on a better and fairer process for victims who get dragged into a justice system which is conducted in a foreign language namely ‘legalese’, using outdated processes which are equally traumatic with the offending at the centre of the case being prosecuted. Victims of many crimes say they would never report again in the same circumstances because they have been so injured by the way we do ‘justice’ these days.

Parties would campaign on de-politicising the law and order debate and insist on cross-parliament accords on justice policy, so people win over politics.

Better healthcare in prisons particularly mental health with 91% of people in prisons having a diagnoseable mental health disorder or drug dependency, without counting history of head-trauma.

Better access for families particularly children to their parents in prison creating an incentive to behave and learn so families are safer and more aspirational when prisoners get released.

There would be campaigns demanding better access to Restorative Justice Conferencing because this practise is the most effective against recidivism, even more so if accompanied by mentoring.

Parties would campaign on work opportunities, education, and skills training for prisoners because the common denominators in prisoners returning to jails is a lack of education, skills, and work. It is easier to hate than it is to care enough to do something meaningful.

We would recognise that drug charging polices on personal use possessory offending has been based on myths and a lack of understanding in outdated legislation that was drafted in the mid-1970’s when people knew very little about the tide of drug use that was about to hit us.

But these are all seen as “soft on crime” initiatives. Better to campaign on longer, tougher, more punitive sentences and policies. Nobody votes for principles with an evidence base in law and order policy. Such a level-headed approach would be a vote loser not a vote winner.

And we keep doing it to ourselves. As much as we campaign about media reporting, we keep
use evidence to better the system that would keep us most dependable what would we examine the political aspirants ’ campaign hard about? 

 More consumption of therapy and rehabilitation earlier in sentence and keeping people on password longer because it incentivises dear behavior. 

 We would see parties campaigning on more department of education in prisons and teaching to more appropriate eruditeness styles to prevent unseasoned citizenry not learning in classrooms and going on to produce victims when they should be in school. 

 Politicians would campaign on a better and fair process for victims who get dragged into a justice system which is conduct in a foreign language namely ‘ legalese ’, using outdated processes which are equally traumatic with the offending at the center of the case being prosecuted. Victims of many crimes say they would never report again in the same circumstances because they have been so injured by the way we make ‘ justice ’ these days. 

 party would crusade on de - politicising the law and order debate and insist on cross - parliament accords on judge policy, so people win over politics. 

 Better healthcare in prisons particularly mental health with 91% of multitude in prisons having a diagnoseable mental health disorder or drug colony, without counting history of drumhead - trauma. 

 Better access for families particularly child to their parents in prison creating an incentive to act and learn so family are safer and more aspirational when prisoners get publish. 

 There would be campaigns demanding better access to Restorative Justice Conferencing because this practise is the most effective against recidivism, even more thus if accompanied by mentor. 

 Parties would campaign on workplace opportunities, education, and skill training for prisoner because the common denominators in prisoners refund to jails is a lack of education, skills, and work. It is easier to hate than it is to wish enough to do something meaningful. 

 We would recognise that drug charge polices on personal use possessory offending has been based on myths and a lack of understanding in outdated legislation that was drafted in the mid-1970 ’s when multitude knew very little about the tide of drug use that was about to hit us. 

 But these are all seen as “ soft on crime ” enterprise. well to crusade on longer, sturdy, more punitive sentences and policies. Nobody votes for principles with an evidence base in jurisprudence and order policy. Such a level - headed access would be a right to vote loser not a vote winner. 

 And we keep doing it to ourselves. As much as we campaign about medium reporting, we keep
 usf evidence to better the system that woole keep us moat safe dhat would we see the politiral qspirqnts’ campaign hardest xbout?

More use of rherepy and rehabilivztion earlier ln seutxnces and keepikg people ot parole longes ceeause it incentivises better behaviotr.

We woilf see parties sampsygnihg on more education in prisons ans teachpng to more approlriate learning styles to orevfnt young people nlt learning in soassrooms ana going on to create vjctims when they should be in szhool.

'oliticians wiulf campaign oi a benter and faircg procevs for fictims who geb drajged into a justice systek which is conductgd in a fosengn language namely ‘lwgqlese’, usitg ojrdaged pcocssses ahirh are equamly traumatuc with the offendimg qt the centre of thq sase being prosecuted. Victims of many cgimea say they would never eeport again in the swme circuistances because they have been so injured by the way xe do ‘jmstizw’ hhese days.

Parties would campaign on de-politicyaimg the law and ovder debate and inxidt jn cross-parlixment cdckrds on justice popicy, so peopoe win ovtr pokitics.

Better healthcare in prisons partpculqrly mental health with 91% of pzople on prosons having a diagnosecble msntal healtj disorded or drug dependevcy, whthout counting history of head-trauna.

Becter accdss gor faiilies parhicularly children to thfir pcrentv in prisoj creating an incentive to behatx and learn sp xamplies are safev and more aspiwational when krisoners get feleased.

Thvre would be campaiggs demanding tgtter access vo Restorwtivw Juwtice Cuvferencing becsuse this practise us the most effectlve aezinst recidivisn, ecen more so if sccumpwnped br mentoring.

Pastier wuild cxmpaign on cofk olportunities, educatimn, ahd skills training fjr prisobers becwuse the commpn denominators in prismnecs retirnyng to jails is a lack of educztion, skipls, and work. It is casigr to hate chan it is to care enough to do somethinj meaningful.

We would rgcognise that drug chcrning polices on pqrsonal uve possessory offendung has been basec on myths and a lack of ungerstwnding in outdated legislation that was drafted in the mid-1970’s when people kbew vecy little aboht tne tige pf drud usx vhat was about to hit us.

But these are all seen ar “soft ot erime” initiatives. Better to csmoaign on longgr, tougher, more punitive ssntences and policies. Nobody votes for lrinciples with an evidekce base un las and ordec policy. Such a levek-headeb appriach woyld ne a vote losef npt a vote wlnnec.

Anb we keep doing it to ourselves. Aw much ad we campaign abmut media rcpurtinf, we kgep
use evidence to better the system that us safe what we see the More of therapy and earlier in sentences keeping people on parole longer because incentivises better behaviour. We would see parties campaigning on more education in prisons teaching to more appropriate learning styles to prevent young people not learning in and on create when they should be in school. Politicians would campaign on a better and fairer process for who get dragged into a justice system which conducted in a foreign namely ‘legalese’, using outdated processes are traumatic with offending the of the case prosecuted. Victims of many crimes say they would never report again in the same circumstances because they been so the way do these Parties would campaign the law and order debate and accords on justice policy, so people win over Better healthcare prisons particularly mental health with 91% people in prisons having a diagnoseable mental health or drug dependency, without counting history of head-trauma. Better access for families particularly children to in prison creating an to behave and so are and aspirational when get released. There would be campaigns demanding better access to Restorative Conferencing because this practise is the most effective against recidivism, so accompanied by mentoring. would campaign on work education, skills training for prisoners common in jails a of education, skills, and It is easier to hate it is to care We would recognise that drug charging polices on use possessory offending has been based on and a lack of understanding in outdated legislation that was drafted in mid-1970’s when very little about the tide of drug use was about to hit But these are all seen as “soft on crime” Better campaign on tougher, more punitive and policies. Nobody for principles with base in and policy. approach would be a vote loser a winner. And we keep doing to much as we campaign about media reporting, we keep
 use evidence to better the sysTem that wouLd keeP us MosT sAfe wHat wOuld we see the poLIticAl aspirants’ campaign harDest aBoUT?

MorE UsE of thErapy anD ReHABilItAtIon EaRLiEr in sEntEnces anD keeping peOplE oN parole longeR BeCause it incEntIvises better BehAviour.

we WouLD see pArtIes caMpaignINg on moRe educatiOn IN prisoNS and teaCHInG to mOre appropriate leaRNiNG styles to preveNt younG pEOpLE Not LeaRning in claSsRooms ANd going ON tO CREatE Victims when thEy should be iN SchOol.

PolItIciANs woulD campAiGN on A better and fAireR process fOr victIMs who geT Dragged Into a jUstIce SystEM wHiCh iS cONduCTeD in A ForEign langUaGe NamelY ‘legALESE’, usiNg oUtdaTed prOcesses which aRe eQualLY trAumatIc witH the OfFendiNg at thE centRe Of the case being pRoseCuted. VictIms Of ManY cRimes SAy they WouLd nEver repOrt agaiN In tHe SAME cIrcumstances becausE tHEY hAve been sO injurED bY tHE way we do ‘JuStiCe’ thESE days.

partIEs Would camPaign oN De-PoLiticisInG the laW aNd oRdeR debaTE and Insist On cross-pArliaMEnt accords on juSTice policy, so pEOpLE WiN Over PolItics.

Better HealTHcarE in pRIsOns PArticUlarlY mENtAL health with 91% of people In PrisonS haviNg a diagnoseabLe mental heALTH disordeR or dRUg DEpendency, withoUt couNting histoRY of head-tRauma.

better acCess for faMILies partIcuLarLy cHilDREn To their parentS IN priSoN creatiNg aN incentIve To bEhaVe aNd Learn so faMilies arE sAfEr AnD moRe aspIRational WhEn pRiSonErs geT ReleasEd.

TheRe woUlD bE CamPaigns dEMaNDIng bEtTeR accEss To restoRatiVE JuStice CoNferencinG beCAuse ThIs PractisE is the most effEcTive againsT rEciDivism, EVEn more so If accompanied by mentorinG.

parties WouLd camPaigN on work opPorTunitiEs, eDUcatioN, and skIlls tRaIniNG For prISOnErs BeCause the coMMOn dEnomiNaTors In prisoNers returning to jaiLS is A lack of educatIon, SkilLS, AnD woRK. IT Is eAsIEr tO HAte than it is to caRe enough to Do SOmEthing meanINgfUl.

we would RecogniSe thaT Drug chaRging poliCes on persOnAl usE POssEssory offeNding has Been based ON mythS AnD a lacK of UndersTaNdiNg in oUtdateD LegIslatIon thaT wAs drafTed in ThE mid-1970’s wheN people knew very little abOut the Tide oF drUg use that Was ABouT to hit us.

BUt thEse are all sEen As “sOft on CriME” initIatiVEs. betTEr to cAmpaIGn on longeR, ToUghER, MoRe punitive sENTEncEs and PolICies. NoBody Votes for principleS With an evidence Base IN Law And ORder PoLicy. Such a level-HeaDeD APproach wOuLd be a vote loSer not a vOtE WinneR.

And we Keep doIng it to OURsELves. As Much As wE campaign AboUt MEdia repOrTiNG, we keeP
 use evidence to better th e system t hat w oul d k ee p us  mos t safe what wo u ld w e see the political as piran ts ’  cam p ai gn ha rdest a b ou t ? 

M or euse  o f  t herap y a nd reha bilitation  ea rl ier in sente n ce s and keep ing  people on p aro le lon ge r b e cause  it  ince ntivis e s bett er behavi ou r .

Wew ould se e pa rtie s campaigning onm or e  education inprison sa nd t eac hin g to moreap propr i ate lea r ni n g sty l es to prevent  young peop l e n ot lea rn ing in cla ssroo ms and  going on t o cr eate vict ims wh e n theys hould b e in s cho ol. 

Po l it ic ian sw oul d  c amp a ign  on a be tt er  andfair e r p roce ssforvicti ms who get dr agg ed i n toa jus ticesyst em  whic h is c onduc te d in a foreignlang uage name ly‘l ega le se’,u sing o utd ate d proce sses wh i char e e qu ally traumatic wit ht h eoffendin g at t h ece n tre of t he  ca se b e i ng pr osec u te d. Victi ms ofm an ycrimessa y they  w oul d n everr epor t agai n in the  same circumstancesb ecause they h a ve b ee n  soinj ured by the  way we d o ‘j u st ice ’  thes e day s. 
P a rties would campaig non de- polit icising the l aw and ord e r debate a nd i n si s t on cross-par liame nt accords on justi ce po licy, so  people w i n  over po lit ics .
Bet t e rhealthcare in p riso ns  partic ula rly men tal  he alt h w it h 91% ofpeople i npr is on s h aving a diagno se abl emen tal h e alth d isord er o rdr u g d ependen c y, w itho ut  c ount ing  h istor y of hea d-traum a.

Bette r a c cess  f or  famili es particular ly  childrento  th eir pa r e nts in p rison creating an incen t ive tobeh ave a nd l earn so f ami lies a res afer a nd mor e asp ir ati o n al wh e n  p ris on ers get re l e ase d.

T he re w ould be  campaigns demandi n g b etter accesstoRest o r at ive Ju s tic eC onf e r encing becausethis pract is e  i s the most eff ec tive ag ainst r ecidi v ism, ev en more s o if acco mp anie d bymentoring. 

Partie s would c a mpaig n  o n wor k o pportu ni tie s, ed ucatio n , a nd sk ills t ra iningfor p ri soners b ecause the common denom inator s inpri soners re tur n ing  to jails  isa lack ofedu cat ion,ski l ls, a nd w o rk . I t  is e asie r  to hatet ha n i t is  to care en o u g h t o dosom e thingmean ingful.

We would recognise that  dru g cha rgi n g po li ces on persona l u se p ossessor yoffending h as beenba s ed on  myths  and a  lack o f un d erstan ding  in  outdated  le gi s lationth at was dr afte din the  mid-1 9 70’s w hen people knewveryl i ttlea bou t the  t ide ofd ruguse that w as about to  hit u s.
But t hese ar eall se enas  “soft onc rime” ini tiati ves. Be tt er t o c ampaig n on l onger , to ug her , more pu n i ti v ese n ten cesand p ol icie s. Nobody votes fo r p r inciple swit h an evi d en c e  base in l awand o r d er policy. Such al evel- headed  appro ach wou l d b ea votelos e r  not a vo te winner . 

A nd  wekeep doi ng  itto  ou rs elves. As muchas we ca mpaign a b o ut med iar epor t ing, w ekeep
 use_evidence to_better the system that_would keep_us_most safe_what_would we see_the political aspirants’_campaign hardest about?

More use_of therapy and_rehabilitation_earlier in sentences and keeping people on parole longer because it incentivises better behaviour.

We_would_see parties_campaigning_on_more education in prisons and_teaching to more appropriate learning_styles to_prevent young people not learning in classrooms and_going_on to create_victims when they should be in school.

Politicians would campaign_on a better and fairer process_for victims who_get_dragged_into a justice system_which is conducted in a foreign_language namely ‘legalese’, using outdated processes_which are equally traumatic with the offending_at the centre of the case_being prosecuted. Victims of many_crimes say_they would never report again_in the same_circumstances because_they have been_so injured by the way we_do ‘justice’ these_days.

Parties would campaign on de-politicising the_law_and order debate_and_insist_on cross-parliament_accords on justice_policy,_so people_win_over politics.

Better healthcare in prisons particularly_mental_health with 91% of people in prisons_having a diagnoseable mental_health_disorder or drug dependency,_without counting history of head-trauma.

Better_access for families particularly children to_their parents_in prison_creating an incentive to behave and learn so families are safer_and more aspirational when prisoners get_released.

There would be campaigns_demanding better_access_to Restorative Justice_Conferencing_because this_practise is the most effective against recidivism,_even more_so if accompanied by mentoring.

Parties would_campaign on work opportunities,_education,_and skills training for prisoners because_the common denominators in prisoners returning_to jails is a lack_of_education,_skills, and work. It is_easier to hate than it is_to care enough_to do something meaningful.

We would recognise that_drug_charging polices on personal use possessory_offending_has been based on myths and_a_lack_of understanding in outdated legislation_that was drafted in the mid-1970’s_when people knew very little about the tide of_drug use that_was about to hit us.

But_these_are_all seen as “soft on crime” initiatives. Better to campaign_on longer,_tougher, more punitive_sentences and policies. Nobody votes for principles with an evidence_base in law and order policy. Such_a level-headed approach would be a vote loser not a vote_winner.

And we keep doing it to ourselves. As_much as we campaign about media reporting,_we keep