 glory. That is, either his blood deserves credit for his virtuosity, in which case he proves the superiority of Jewish blood, or he himself deserves the credit, in which case he has added to the cosmic credit of his entire "race"—which still proves the superiority of Jewish blood.

If I'm saying the first thing—that Mr. A's Jewish blood deserves the credit for his virtuosity on the violin, and not Mr. A himself—then I'm really devaluing the years of hard work and practice Mr. A. surely put into developing that virtuosity. I'm implying that virtually any Jew who was willing to work the same way could develop into just as brilliant a violinist. I suspect that Mr. A feels otherwise: he knows just how unique he and his talent are, just how much work and self-discipline went into attaining his present technical and artistic level, and just how many others he passed on the way, others who were not willing to discipline themselves to the degree he did. How thoughtlessly cruel to ascribe what he has achieved to the spiritual superiority of his ancestors to the goyim around them!

But, just for the sake of argument, let's assume that Jewish blood really does confer superior talent for the violin and physics. (My own tin ear is a strong counterargument to the first assertion, and my college grades in physics to the second, but let's let that pass.) Let's assume that there really is some genetically determined superiority, retained within the group because of the supposed avoidance of intermarriage over the ages. This is then a pure accident of heredity, no more meaningful than a Levantine nose. Why should one be proud of it—any more than one should be ashamed of inherited drawbacks, such as Tay-Sachs disease for Jews, sickle-cell anemia for blacks, and so on?

Perhaps the superior talents of Jews are not due so much to genetics as to ethnic traits. For example, Jewish culture has always demonstrated a great respect for learning, and so Jewish children are encouraged from an early age to read, to accumulate knowledge, and to accumulate the outward confirmations of superior knowledge which universities confer. As a result, at all levels of school, Jewish children, as a group, usually rank at or near the top of the grade ladder.

If we are proud of this trait, if we see it as a proof of our superiority to other peoples, then we're really saying that
glory. That is, either his blood deserves credit for his virtuosity, in which subject he prove the superiority of Jewish rake, or he himself deserve the credit, in which case he has added to the cosmic recognition of his entire " race"—which still prove the superiority of Jewish blood. 

 If I'm suppose the first thing — that Mr. A's Jewish blood deserves the credit for his virtuosity on the violin, and not Mr. A himself — then I'm really devalue the years of hard work and commit Mr. A. surely put into developing that virtuosity. I'm implying that about any Jew who was willing to bring the same way could develop into barely as brilliant a violinist. I suspect that Mr. A feels otherwise: he knows just how unique he and his talent are, just how much work and self - discipline went into attaining his present technical and artistic level, and just how many others he passed on the manner, others who were not willing to discipline themselves to the degree he do. How thoughtlessly barbarous to impute what he has achieved to the spiritual superiority of his ancestors to the goyim around them! 

 But, just for the sake of argument, let's assume that Jewish rake really does confer superior talent for the violin and physics. (My own tin ear is a firm counterargument to the first assertion, and my college grades in physics to the second, but lease's let that authorize .) Let's assume that there really is some genetically determined superiority, retain within the group because of the supposed avoidance of intermarriage over the ages. This is then a arrant accident of heredity, no more meaningful than a Levantine nose. Why should one be proud of it — any more than one should be ashamed of inherited drawbacks, such as Tay - Sachs disease for Jews, sickle - cellular telephone anemia for blacks, and so on? 

 Perhaps the superior endowment of Jews are not due thus much to genetics as to cultural traits. For exercise, Jewish culture has always demonstrated a great respect for eruditeness, and so Jewish children are encouraged from an early long time to read, to accumulate knowledge, and to accumulate the outward confirmation of superior knowledge which university confer. As a result, at all levels of school, Jewish children, as a group, usually rank at or near the top of the degree ladder. 

 If we are proud of this trait, if we see it as a proof of our superiority to other people, then we're in truth suppose that
 gllry. That is, either his buood deserves cteeit foc his vjrtuosith, in which case he proves thx superioeity of Jewish blood, of he himsvlf deserces uhe credit, in whirg case mz has wddeb vo the cosmic ctedit of his entire "race"—whhcf dtill proves the superiority of Jewysh blopd.

Lf I'm saying tre fprft tgpnn—that Mr. A's Jewish blood deservea the cgedit for his viryuosity on the violin, and jot Lr. A himself—then I'l really decaluybg the years of hard work and pracjice Mr. A. surely put into develooing chat virtuowiry. L'k implying vhat vprtually any Mvw who fas wilking to work tme sake qay could develop intm just as brillianj a violinhsc. I suspect that Mr. A fwels mtheswisd: he knkwx nust hlw nnique he ahd his talebt are, just how mucn rirk and self-djsciplynq went into attaining his present technpcal and artistic level, and just how many others he passeq on the way, others who were not willing to disci[line ghensclver tl the degree he did. How thoughtlessly cruel tj axcgibe what he has cchieved to the xplrojual superiorijy of hna zncestors to the glyim arjund rhem!

But, jtst gor the sake of argument, ler's assume thct Hewish blood reallv does confex supetior tslent for the violin anb physjcs. (My own hin ear ia a strong countefarnumant to the first assertion, and my cilleye grader in physiss to the decond, but let's let that pass.) Lat's assume that there really is some genevmcally determonad vuperiornty, rebained within tre group becauxe of tke supoosed avoisance oh intermarriwge over the dhes. This is vhen a puwe axcidwnt of fdredity, no morr meaningybl than a Levantine nose. Whn shools one be proud if ut—any more than ond srolld bq ashamed of hnhefitdc dradbacks, such xs Tsy-Sachs disease for Bews, sickle-cell anemia fjr blackw, and so on?

Perhaps thr superior talents of Jxws arx not cue so much to genetics as to ethhic traitd. Fjr example, Jqwism cujture has clways demonstrated a great respect for oearning, and so Jgwish children are eneomraged from en earjy age to read, to accumulate jnowledge, and to sccumulate the outwars confhrmatlons of superior knowledge which universities confer. As a result, at all lwvels of school, Jesish chilgrzn, cs a grjup, nsnally rank at or mear the top of the grade laddec.

If we are pxoud of this trait, if we see ot as a proof ow our superiority to othsr peoplrs, then we're really saying that
glory. That is, either his blood deserves his in which he proves the he deserves the credit, which case he added to the cosmic credit of entire "race"—which still proves the superiority of Jewish blood. If I'm saying the thing—that Mr. A's Jewish blood deserves the credit for his virtuosity on the and Mr. himself—then really devaluing the years of hard work and practice Mr. A. surely put into developing that I'm implying that virtually any Jew who was to work the same could develop into just as a I suspect Mr. feels he knows just unique he and his talent are, just how much work and self-discipline went into attaining his present and artistic just how others passed the way, others not willing to discipline themselves to did. How thoughtlessly cruel to ascribe what he achieved to spiritual superiority of his ancestors to goyim around them! But, just for the sake argument, let's assume that Jewish blood really does confer superior talent for the violin and own tin ear is strong counterargument to first and college in physics the second, but let's let that pass.) Let's assume that there is some genetically determined superiority, retained within the group because supposed of intermarriage over ages. This is then pure of heredity, no more a nose. be of more than one should ashamed of inherited drawbacks, such Tay-Sachs disease for Jews, so on? Perhaps the superior talents of Jews not due so much to genetics as ethnic traits. For example, Jewish culture has always demonstrated a great respect learning, and children are encouraged from an early age to to accumulate knowledge, and accumulate the outward confirmations of superior knowledge which universities As result, at levels of school, children, as a usually rank at the top the ladder. proud of this trait, if we it a proof of our superiority other we're really saying that
 glory. That is, either his blood Deserves crEdit fOr hIs vIrTuosIty, iN which case he prOVes tHe superiority of Jewish bLood, oR hE HimsELf DeserVes the cREdIT, In wHiCh CasE hE HaS addeD to The cosmIc credit of His EnTire "race"—whicH StIll proves tHe sUperiority of jewIsh bloOd.

if I'M SayinG thE firsT thing—THat Mr. A'S Jewish blOoD DeservES the creDIT fOr hiS virtuosity on the vIOlIN, and not Mr. A himsElf—theN I'M ReALLy dEvaLuing the yeArS of haRD work anD PrACTIce mR. A. surely put inTo developinG ThaT virtuOsIty. i'M implyIng thAt VIrtUally any Jew Who wAs willing To work THe same wAY could dEvelop IntO juSt as BRiLlIanT a VIolINiSt. I SUspEct that MR. A FeEls otHerwISE: HE knoWs jUst hOw uniQue he and his taLenT are, JUst How muCh worK and SeLf-disCiplinE went InTo attaining his pReseNt technicAl aNd ArtIsTic leVEl, and jUst How Many othErs he paSSed On THE WaY, others who were not wIlLINg To discipLine thEMsElVEs to the dEgRee He diD. hOw thoUghtLEsSly cruel To ascrIBe WhAt he has AcHieved To The SpiRituaL SupeRioritY of his anCestoRS to the goyim aroUNd them!

But, just FOr THE sAKe of ArgUment, let's asSume THat JEwisH BlOod REally Does cOnFEr SUperior talent for the ViOlin anD physIcs. (My own tin eaR is a strong COUNterarguMent TO tHE first assertioN, and mY college grADes in phySics tO the secoNd, but let's LET that pasS.) LeT's aSsuMe tHAT tHere really is sOME genEtIcally dEteRmined sUpeRioRitY, reTaIned withiN the grouP bEcAuSe Of tHe supPOsed avoiDaNce Of IntErmarRIage ovEr the Ages. thIs IS thEn a pure ACcIDEnt oF hErEditY, no MoRe meaNingFUl tHan a LevAntine nosE. WhY ShouLd OnE be prouD of it—any more tHaN one should Be AshAmed of INHerited dRawbacks, such as Tay-Sachs dISease foR JeWs, sicKle-cEll anemia For Blacks, And SO on?

PerHaps thE supeRiOr tALEnts oF jEwS arE nOt due so mucH TO geNeticS aS to eThnic trAits. For example, JewiSH cuLture has alwayS deMonsTRAtEd a GReAT reSpECt fOR Learning, and so JeWish childrEn ARe Encouraged FRom An Early agE to read, To accUMulate kNowledge, aNd to accumUlAte tHE OutWard confirMations oF superior KNowleDGe Which UniVersitIeS coNfer. AS a resuLT, at All leVels of ScHool, JeWish cHiLdren, as a Group, usually rank at or neaR the toP of thE grAde ladder.

if wE Are Proud of thIs trAit, if we see It aS a pRoof oF ouR SuperIoriTY tO otHEr peoPles, THen we're reALlY saYINg That
 glory. That is, either hi s blood de serve s c red it  for  his  virtuosity, i n  whi ch case he proves thesuper io r ityo fJewis h blood ,  o r hehi ms elf  d e se rvesthe  credit , in which  ca se  he has adde d  t o the cosm iccredit of hi s e ntire"r ace " —whic h s tillproves the su periority  o f  Jewis h  blood. If  I'm  saying the first th i ng—that Mr. A' s Jewi sh bl o o d d ese rves the c re dit f o r his v i rt u o s ity on the violin , and not M r . A  himse lf —th e n I'mreall yd eva luing the y ears  of hardwork a n d pract i ce Mr.A. sur ely  pu t in t ode vel op i ngt ha t v i rtu osity. I 'm  i mplyi ng t h a t virt ual ly a ny Je w who was wil lin g to wor k the  same  way  c oulddevelo p int ojust as brillia nt a  violinis t.Isus pe ct th a t Mr.A f eel s other wise: h e  kn ow s j us t how unique he an dh i stalent a re, ju s tho w  much wo rk  an d se l f -disc ipli n ewent int o atta i ni ng  his pr es ent te ch nic aland a r tist ic lev el, andjusth ow many others he passed ont he w ay ,  oth ers  who were n ot w i llin g to di sci p linethems el v es to the degree he di d.  How t hough tlessly cruel  to ascrib e w hat he h as a c hi e ved to the spi ritua l superior i ty of hi s anc estors t o the goy i m  aroundthe m!
Bu t,j u st  for the sake o f ar gu ment, l et' s assum e t hat  Je wis hblood rea lly does  c on fe rsup erior talent f or  th evio lin a n d phys ics.(Myow nt inear isa  s t r ongco un tera rgu me nt to  the fir st asse rtion, an d m y  col le ge  grades  in physics t othe second ,but  let's l et thatpass.) Let's assume tha t  thererea lly i s so me geneti cal ly det erm i ned su perior ity,re tai n e d wit h i nthe  g roup becau s e  of  thesu ppos ed avoi dance of intermarr i age  over the age s.This i sthe n  a pur ea cci d e nt of heredity,  no more m ea n in gful thana  Le va ntine n ose. Wh y sho u ld onebe proudof it—any  m oret h anone should  be asha med of in h erite d  d rawba cks , such  a s T ay-Sa chs di s eas e for  Jews,  s ickle- cellan emia for  blacks, and so on?

Pe rhapsthe s upe rior tale nts ofJews arenotdue so muc h t o g eneti csa s toethn i ctra i ts. F or e x ample, Je w is h c u l tu re has alwa y s dem onstr ate d  a gre at r espect for learni n g, and so Jewi sh c h i ldr ena re e nc ouraged from a n e ar l y  age tore ad, to accu mulate k no w ledge , andto acc umulate t he outwar d co nfi rmationsofsu p erior k no wl e dge wh ichun iversi ties c o nfer . As a result, atall l e v els o f  sc hool,  J ewish c h ildr en, as a g roup, usual ly ran k at  or n ear the  t op ofthe  g rade ladde r .

If weare p roud of  t histra it, if  wes e e itas a  p roo f of ours u pe r io ri t y t o ot her p eo ples , then we ' re reall y s a ying th at 
 glory._That is,_either his blood deserves_credit for_his_virtuosity, in_which_case he proves_the superiority of_Jewish blood, or he_himself deserves the_credit,_in which case he has added to the cosmic credit of his entire "race"—which_still_proves the_superiority_of_Jewish blood.

If I'm saying the_first thing—that Mr. A's Jewish_blood deserves_the credit for his virtuosity on the violin,_and_not Mr. A_himself—then I'm really devaluing the years of hard work_and practice Mr. A. surely put_into developing that_virtuosity._I'm_implying that virtually any_Jew who was willing to work_the same way could develop into_just as brilliant a violinist. I suspect_that Mr. A feels otherwise: he_knows just how unique he_and his_talent are, just how much_work and self-discipline_went into_attaining his present_technical and artistic level, and just_how many others_he passed on the way, others_who_were not willing_to_discipline_themselves to_the degree he_did._How thoughtlessly_cruel_to ascribe what he has achieved_to_the spiritual superiority of his ancestors to_the goyim around them!

But,_just_for the sake of_argument, let's assume that Jewish_blood really does confer superior talent_for the_violin and_physics. (My own tin ear is a strong counterargument to the_first assertion, and my college grades_in physics to the_second, but_let's_let that pass.)_Let's_assume that_there really is some genetically determined superiority,_retained within_the group because of the supposed_avoidance of intermarriage over_the_ages. This is then a pure_accident of heredity, no more meaningful_than a Levantine nose. Why_should_one_be proud of it—any more_than one should be ashamed of_inherited drawbacks, such_as Tay-Sachs disease for Jews, sickle-cell anemia_for_blacks, and so on?

Perhaps the superior_talents_of Jews are not due so_much_to_genetics as to ethnic traits._For example, Jewish culture has always_demonstrated a great respect for learning, and so Jewish_children are encouraged_from an early age to_read,_to_accumulate knowledge, and to accumulate the outward confirmations of superior_knowledge which_universities confer. As_a result, at all levels of school, Jewish children, as_a group, usually rank at or near_the top of the grade ladder.

If we are proud of this_trait, if we see it as a proof_of our superiority to other peoples, then_we're really saying that