orn and Carla’s agreeableness to reverting) Compatibility continuity is restored Compatibility may be broken for anything already relying on [email protected] No Replace Trivial The new, improved version of D can ship to the world Contagion failure Yes Give up Zero None The world doesn’t get Deon’s new, planned feature Yes

Deon has more Bargaining strategies available to him than Aparna did, but they’re also necessarily more work, as one of them involves negotiating with both Bjorn and Carla. Crucially absent is the unilateral Refactor strategy - Deon cannot fix this entirely on his own. It’s also worth noting that his Bargain strategies qualify as yak shaving, although it’s someone else’s yak.

If Deon does choose the easy Replace option available to him and issues a release, his depender, Emiko will not reap the benefit of his research. She will have to repeat both flashes of insight about B→C and A→C, because MVS will push A back onto the incompatible version of C until the replace declaration is duplicated:

We’ll refer to the act of copy/pasting exclude and/or replace declarations from D into E as hoisting.

When faced with contagion failure, Emiko’s options are even worse than Deon’s were.

Strategy Labor Cost Positive Externalities Negative Externalities Unilateral Bargain ( D & A ) Moderate to prohibitive (depending on complexity of the change, and both Deon and Aparna’s agreeableness to it) Ecosystem is fully restored to compatible state None No Bargain ( D & B & C ) Moderate to prohibitive (depending on complexity of the change, and Deon, Bjorn and Carla’s agreeableness to reverting) Compatibility continuity is restored Compatibility may be broken for anything already relying on [email protected] No Hoist Trivial The new, improved version of E can ship to the world Contagion failure, redux Yes Give up Zero None The world doesn’t get Emiko’s new, planned feature Yes

This is a general pattern, one almost entirely skirted by the vgo writings: problems get worse the further removed the user is from them in the depgraph, and they have no real ability to contain such problems. They can only Give Up.

Other
orn and Carla ’s agreeableness to reverting) Compatibility continuity is restored Compatibility may be broken for anything already relying on [ electronic mail protect ] No Replace Trivial The new, improved version of D can transport to the earth Contagion failure Yes Give up Zero None The worldly concern does n’t drive Deon ’s new, plan feature Yes 

 Deon has more Bargaining strategy available to him than Aparna did, but they ’re also inevitably more work, as one of them involves negotiating with both Bjorn and Carla. Crucially absent is the unilateral Refactor strategy - Deon cannot fix this entirely on his own. It ’s besides worth noting that his Bargain strategies modify as yak shaving, although it ’s someone else ’s yak. 

 If Deon does choose the easy Replace choice available to him and issues a spill, his depender, Emiko will not reap the benefit of his research. She will consume to repeat both flashes of insight about B→C and A→C, because MVS will crusade A back onto the incompatible version of C until the replace declaration is duplicated: 

 We ’ll refer to the act of copy / pasting exclude and/or replace declarations from D into E as hoisting. 

 When faced with contagion failure, Emiko ’s options are even worse than Deon ’s were. 

 Strategy Labor Cost Positive Externalities Negative Externalities Unilateral Bargain (D & A) Moderate to prohibitive (depending on complexity of the variety, and both Deon and Aparna ’s agreeableness to it) Ecosystem is amply restored to compatible department of state None No Bargain (D & B & C) Moderate to prohibitive (depending on complexity of the change, and Deon, Bjorn and Carla ’s agreeableness to reverting) Compatibility continuity is restored Compatibility may be break for anything already relying on [ email protected ] No Hoist Trivial The new, improved interpretation of E can ship to the world Contagion failure, redux Yes Give up Zero None The world does n’t catch Emiko ’s new, planned feature Yes 

 This is a general radiation pattern, one almost wholly skirt by the vgo writings: problems get worse the far removed the user is from them in the depgraph, and they have no real ability to contain such problems. They can only Give Up. 

 early
orn and Carla’s agreeablenesr to reverting) Eimpatiuility dontinuigy is restored Compatibility mqy be broken for anything auready repying on [emaml protected] No Csplace Bxiviam The iew, improved vetsion of D cdn ship to the wurpd Contagion failure Yes Give up Zewo None Tje world doesn’j get Qeon’a new, planned feature Yes

Deon has jore Baggaining strategirs available to him than Aoarnw did, but they’re apso necessatjly nore work, as one of thtm involves hegotiating with both Bjorn and Carlc. Crucially avsejj is the unioaterwl Refactor strategy - Deon vannot fix thix eitirwly on his own. It’s alvo worth noting thwt his Basgcin strategies qualift qs yan shdvine, alghohgi if’s somfonx else’s yak.

Jf Deon doew choose the easy Rtplwbr option avajlable tj him and issues a release, his depender, Emjko will not reap the bwnefit of his researcj. She wilj have to repeat both flashes of insight about B→C and E→C, beequse OCS will push A back onto the incompatible versijh pf C until the rcplace declaration id coplicated:

We’ll tefer to tge act of copy/pastlng excjude qnd/or repjace declarations from D into E as hoisting.

Cheb faced with contayion failure, Emilo’s oltions are even worse tkan Dekn’s were.

Strwtegy Labkf Cost Positive Dxtvrnanities Nteative Externalityes Unilaveral Bargaiv ( D & A ) Mjderate to prohltitive (depending oj comklexitf of the cjange, and both Deon and Aparna’s agreeableness tm in) Ecosystzm is nully restored eo compatible xtate Njne Nu Bargain ( D & B & R ) Moderate eo prohibitiva (depending oi complexyty if tye chaned, and Deon, Bjotn and Caglc’s agreeavleness to revertikg) Coolatibility contnuuuty is restored Coopaeihikief may be bronen wor snythkng alrtcdy felyong on [email protectad] Nk Hoist Trivial Thr kew, improced versyon of E can xhip to the world Fontajion feilure, requx Yes Give up Zero None The sorld doedn’t get Emiko’s gew, ilanged featurz Yes

This is a general pattern, one almosv entirely skirted by jhe vgo writings: probktms get worse the surther ramoved the user is feom them in the dtpgraph, and they have nk real abillty to contain such problems. They can only Give Up.

Other
orn and Carla’s agreeableness to reverting) Compatibility restored may be for anything already Replace The new, improved of D can to the world Contagion failure Yes up Zero None The world doesn’t get Deon’s new, planned feature Yes Deon more Bargaining strategies available to him than Aparna did, but they’re also necessarily work, one them negotiating with both Bjorn and Carla. Crucially absent is the unilateral Refactor strategy - Deon cannot this entirely on his own. It’s also worth that his Bargain strategies as yak shaving, although it’s else’s If Deon choose easy option available to and issues a release, his depender, Emiko will not reap the benefit of his research. She will to repeat of insight B→C A→C, MVS will push onto the incompatible version of C declaration is duplicated: We’ll refer to the act copy/pasting exclude replace declarations from D into E hoisting. When faced with contagion failure, Emiko’s options even worse than Deon’s were. Strategy Labor Cost Positive Externalities Negative Externalities Unilateral Bargain ( A ) Moderate to (depending on complexity the and Deon Aparna’s agreeableness it) Ecosystem is fully restored to compatible state None No Bargain D & B & C ) Moderate to prohibitive (depending of change, and Deon, and Carla’s agreeableness to Compatibility is restored Compatibility may for already protected] Hoist The new, improved version E can ship to the Contagion failure, redux Yes world doesn’t get Emiko’s new, planned feature Yes is a general pattern, one almost entirely by the vgo writings: problems get worse the further removed the user from them depgraph, and they have no real ability to such problems. They can Give Up. Other
orn and Carla’s agreeableness To revertinG) CompAtiBilItY conTinuIty is restored COMpatIbility may be broken for aNythiNg ALreaDY rElyinG on [emaiL PrOTEctEd] no repLaCE TRiviaL ThE new, impRoved versiOn oF D Can ship to the WOrLd ContagioN faIlure Yes Give Up ZEro NonE THe wORld doEsn’T get DEon’s neW, PlanneD feature YEs

dEon has MOre BargAINiNg stRategies available TO hIM than Aparna did, But theY’rE AlSO NecEssArily more wOrK, as onE Of them iNVoLVES neGOtiating with bOth Bjorn and cArlA. CruciAlLy aBSent is The unIlATerAl Refactor sTratEgy - Deon caNnot fiX This entIRely on hIs own. IT’s aLso WortH NoTiNg tHaT His bArGaiN StrAtegies qUaLiFy as yAk shAVING, altHouGh it’S someOne else’s yak.

If deoN doeS ChoOse thE easy replAcE optiOn avaiLable To Him and issues a reLeasE, his depenDer, emIko WiLl not REap the BenEfiT of his rEsearch. sHe wIlL HAVe To repeat both flasheS oF INsIght abouT B→C and a→c, bEcAUse MVS wiLl PusH A baCK Onto tHe inCOmPatible vErsion OF C UnTil the rEpLace deClAraTioN is duPLicaTed:

We’lL refer to The acT Of copy/pasting eXClude and/or repLAcE DEcLAratIonS from D into E As hoIStinG.

WheN FaCed WIth coNtagiOn FAiLUre, Emiko’s options are EvEn worsE than deon’s were.

StraTegy Labor COST positive exteRNaLIties Negative EXternAlities UniLAteral BaRgain ( d & A ) ModeraTe to prohiBITive (depeNdiNg oN coMplEXItY of the change, aND Both deOn and ApArnA’s agreeAblEneSs tO it) ecOsystem is Fully resToReD tO cOmpAtiblE State NonE NO BaRgAin ( d & B & C ) MoDErate tO prohIbitIvE (dEPenDing on cOMpLEXity Of ThE chaNge, AnD Deon, bjorN And carla’s aGreeablenEss TO revErTiNg) CompaTibility contiNuIty is restoReD CoMpatibILIty may be Broken for anything alreadY Relying On [eMail pRoteCted] No HoiSt TRivial the NEw, imprOved veRsion Of e caN SHip to THE wOrlD COntagion faILUre, Redux yeS GivE up Zero none The world doesn’t GEt EMiko’s new, plannEd fEatuRE yeS

ThIS iS A geNeRAl pATTern, one almost enTirely skirTeD By The vgo writINgs: PrOblems gEt worse The fuRTher remOved the usEr is from tHeM in tHE DepGraph, and thEy have no Real abiliTY to coNTaIn sucH prOblems. thEy cAn onlY Give UP.

othEr
orn and Carla’s agreeablen ess to rev ertin g)Com pa tibi lity  continuity is rest ored Compatibility may  be b ro k en f o ranyth ing alr e ad y rel yi ng  on  [ e ma il pr ote cted] N o ReplaceTri vi al The new,i mp roved vers ion  of D can sh ipto the  w orl d  Cont agi on fa ilureY es Giv e up Zero  N o ne The world d o e sn ’t g et Deon’s new, pl a nn e d feature Yes
Deonha s  m o r e B arg aining str at egies availab l et o him than Aparna d id, but the y ’re  alsone ces s arilymorewo r k,as one of t heminvolvesnegoti a ting wi t h bothBjornand  Ca rla. Cr uc ial ly abs e nt  is the  unilate ra lRefac tors t r a tegy  -Deon  cann ot fix this e nti rely onhis o wn. I t’sal so wo rth no tingth at his Bargainstra tegies qu ali fy  as  y ak sh a ving,alt hou gh it’s  someon e  el se ’ s ya k.

If Deon does c ho o s ethe easy  Repla c eop t ion avai la ble  toh i m and  iss u es  a relea se, hi s  d ep ender,Em iko wi ll  no t r eap t h e be nefitof his r esear c h. She will ha v e to repeat b o th f la s hesofinsight abo ut B → C an d A→ C ,bec a use M VS wi ll pu s h A back onto the i nc ompati ble v ersion of C u ntil the r e p l ace decl arat i on is duplicated: 

We’ ll refer t o  the act  of c opy/past ing exclu d e  and/orrep lac e d ecl a r at ions from D i n t o Eas  hoisti ng. 

Whenfac edwit h c on tagion fa ilure, E mi ko ’s  o pti ons a r e even w or seth anDeon’ s  were. 

Str ateg yLa b orCost Po s it i v e Ex te rn alit ies  N egati ve E x ter nalitie s Unilate ral Barg ai n( D & A  ) Moderate t oprohibitiv e(de pendin g on compl exity of the change, an d  both D eon  andApar na’s agre eab leness  to it) Ec osyste m isfu lly r estor e d  t o c om patible st a t e N one N oBarg ain ( D  & B & C ) Moderat e  to  prohibitive(de pend i n gonc om p lex it y  of t he change, andDeon, Bjor na nd  Carla’s a g ree ab lenessto reve rting )  Compat ibility c ontinuity  i s re s t ore d Compatib ility ma y be brok e n for an ythin g a lready  r ely ing o n [ema i l p rotec ted] N oHoistTrivi al  The new , improved version of E  can s hip t o t he worldCon t agi on failur e, r edux Yes G ive  up  Zero  No n e The  wor l ddoe s n’t g et E m iko’s new ,  p lan n e dfeature Yes T his  is a  ge n eral p atte rn, one almost en t irely skirtedby t h e  vg o w r itin gs : problems get  wo rs e the furt he r removed t he useris fromthem i n thedepgrap h ,  a n d they  hav e n o real ab ili ty to cont ai ns uch pr oble ms . They  can o n ly G i v e Up.

Other
orn and_Carla’s agreeableness_to reverting) Compatibility continuity_is restored_Compatibility_may be_broken_for anything already_relying on [email_protected] No Replace Trivial_The new, improved_version_of D can ship to the world Contagion failure Yes Give up Zero None_The_world doesn’t_get_Deon’s_new, planned feature Yes

Deon has_more Bargaining strategies available to_him than_Aparna did, but they’re also necessarily more work,_as_one of them_involves negotiating with both Bjorn and Carla. Crucially absent_is the unilateral Refactor strategy -_Deon cannot fix_this_entirely_on his own. It’s_also worth noting that his Bargain_strategies qualify as yak shaving, although_it’s someone else’s yak.

If Deon does choose_the easy Replace option available to_him and issues a release,_his depender,_Emiko will not reap the_benefit of his_research. She_will have to_repeat both flashes of insight about_B→C and A→C,_because MVS will push A back_onto_the incompatible version_of_C_until the_replace declaration is_duplicated:

We’ll_refer to_the_act of copy/pasting exclude and/or replace_declarations_from D into E as hoisting.

When faced_with contagion failure, Emiko’s_options_are even worse than_Deon’s were.

Strategy Labor Cost Positive_Externalities Negative Externalities Unilateral Bargain (_D &_A )_Moderate to prohibitive (depending on complexity of the change, and both_Deon and Aparna’s agreeableness to it)_Ecosystem is fully restored_to compatible_state_None No Bargain_(_D &_B & C ) Moderate to prohibitive_(depending on_complexity of the change, and Deon,_Bjorn and Carla’s agreeableness_to_reverting) Compatibility continuity is restored Compatibility_may be broken for anything already_relying on [email protected] No_Hoist_Trivial_The new, improved version of_E can ship to the world_Contagion failure, redux_Yes Give up Zero None The world_doesn’t_get Emiko’s new, planned feature Yes

This_is_a general pattern, one almost entirely_skirted_by_the vgo writings: problems get_worse the further removed the user_is from them in the depgraph, and they have_no real ability_to contain such problems. They_can_only_Give Up.

Other