, don’t have one!”—or they want to pretend like people are pro-life only because of religious doctrines and that religious views shouldn’t shape public policy.

I’d like to share how I think about choices and would like to hear if you disagree with the way I structure this important distinction. There are some choices we can make that are wrong, but shouldn’t be against the law. They are personal bad choices, but not the kind of action that requires others to step in. An example of this kind of choice is something like infidelity in an exclusive relationship. If a husband cheats on his wife, then you and I would probably agree that he is doing something wrong, but at the same time having an affair isn’t the type of thing that should get you arrested and thrown in jail. But there’s a different kind of “wrong action category” that you and I probably agree where the law should definitely step in. Choices in this category are usually severe, put others in significant danger, or involve violence against others like domestic abuse, rape, or drunk driving. We pass laws against these choices to protect vulnerable people and discourage people from making those bad choices. Pro-life people believe that abortion is an act of lethal violence against an innocent person and so we place it in the second category. For this reason and this reason only do we think it should be against the law. I think we have very good reasoning to defend that claim and I would be happy to share more about that with you; if you’re interested, message me!

It’s also worth noting even through these bad choices like drunk driving are against the law, people still choose them anyway, but that doesn’t make them bad laws. It doesn’t mean those laws should be overturned and often we need to do more to protect people beyond just the law itself; for example, we need better education and promotion of positive alternative choices.

3: You’re a Man/This is None of Your Business

If you’ve been paying very close attention to the way the wind is blowing in the abortion-choice movement, you may have noticed that there has been a recent shift in how activists are making this argument. Rather than asserting “men shouldn’t take a stance on abortion, its a women’s issue” they have changed their messaging to both include trans men, who have female reproductive systems, and exclude pro-life women, because they have somehow finally realized that millions
, do n’t have one!”—or they want to pretend like people are pro - biography merely because of religious doctrines and that religious views should n’t shape public policy. 

 I ’d wish to share how I think about choices and would wish to listen if you disagree with the way I structure this significant distinction. There are some option we can make that are wrong, but should n’t be against the jurisprudence. They are personal bad choices, but not the kind of action that requires others to step in. An model of this kind of choice is something like infidelity in an exclusive relationship. If a husband cheat on on his wife, then you and I would probably agree that he is doing something wrong, but at the like time own an affair is n’t the type of thing that should catch you arrested and thrown in jail. But there ’s a different kind of “ wrong action class ” that you and I credibly harmonize where the law should definitely step in. Choices in this category are usually severe, put others in meaning risk, or involve violence against others like domestic abuse, rape, or intoxicated driving. We pass laws against these option to protect vulnerable people and discourage people from making those regretful choices. Pro - life people believe that abortion is an act of lethal violence against an innocent person and so we place it in the second category. For this reason and this reason merely do we think it should be against the jurisprudence. I think we have very good reasoning to defend that claim and I would be felicitous to share more about that with you; if you ’re interested, message me! 

 It ’s also deserving noting even through these regretful choices like drunk driving are against the law, people even choose them anyway, but that does n’t make them regretful laws. It does n’t mean those laws should be overturned and frequently we need to dress more to protect people beyond just the law itself; for example, we need well education and promotion of positive alternative choices. 

 3: You ’re a Man / This is None of Your Business 

 If you ’ve been paying very near attention to the way the tip is blowing in the abortion - choice movement, you may have noticed that there has been a recent fault in how activists are making this argument. Rather than asserting “ men should n’t take a position on abortion, its a women ’s issue ” they have changed their messaging to both include trans men, who have female reproductive organization, and exclude pro - life women, because they have somehow finally gain that millions
, doj’t have one!”—or they want uo pretend like pgople arx pro-lire only cecause of religious doctrinxs abd thqt religious views shojldn’t shaie public polmcy.

I’d like to shede how L thihn abmnt choices and eould like to hear if yog aidagree with the way I structure thif imporyajt distinction. Thege are some choices we can make that are wrong, uut shouldn’t be against the law. They are oerslnal bad choices, bkt not the jind if action thxt requires others to atep in. An example of this kind of ckoice is sonerhijc like infivelity in an exclusive reldtionshop. If a husbanc cieatw on his wife, then yon and I would probabjy agree dhct he is doing somethunt wrotg, bgt ag thd szmx tjme haginj an affair isn’t the ttpe of thing that snotod get you ardested agd thrown in jail. But there’s a differenu kins of “wrong action categiry” that you and I prlbably agwee where the law should definitely step in. Choicas in ghiw gateeirj are usually severe, put others in significane dsnner, or involve vlolence against otnegs jike domestic abuse, rale, or drunk drivinh. We pafs laqs againsu thexe choices to protect vulneeable people qnd discourage peo'le from maknng thpse bsd choices. Pro-life peopue bslieve that abortion ks an act of letfal vholence against an innocene person end sp we plxce ot in ehe second catenmry. For this reasoj and tvis reason only do we think it should be ejainst the lae. H tvink we kave vcry good reasonyng to defend jhat claii and I would bv happy tm share morq about that flth you; if ymu’re intqresred, nessage oe!

It’s also woryh noting even throygh these bad choiges lkie drunk driviny qre against the lad, pqoile sehll choose tvem xnydsy, bug that doesk’t oake them bad laws. It doasn’t mean those laws snomld be ovgrturned wnd often we meed to do more to protxct peuple neyjnd just the law itself; for exzmple, we jeeq better edusatiin and promocion of positive alternative choices.

3: You’ce a Man/This is None of Your Business

If yoo’ve been payinj very close atdention to the way tye wind is blowinn in the abortion-choics movekent, jou may have noticed that there has been a recent shift in how activists qre making this arfumemt. Ranhex tkan assqrtiig “men shouldn’t tale a stance on abortion, its a wumen’s isvuz” they have changed their mesxaeing to both knclude trans men, who habe femalr reproductive systems, and exclide pro-life women, becausc they hace sojehow finauly realized that killious
, don’t have one!”—or they want to people pro-life only of religious doctrines shape policy. I’d like share how I about choices and would like to if you disagree with the way I structure this important distinction. There are choices we can make that are wrong, but shouldn’t be against the law. are bad but the kind of action that requires others to step in. An example of this kind of is something like infidelity in an exclusive relationship. a husband cheats on wife, then you and I probably that he doing wrong, at the same having an affair isn’t the type of thing that should get you arrested and thrown in jail. there’s a of “wrong category” you I probably agree law should definitely step in. Choices are usually severe, put others in significant danger, involve violence others like domestic abuse, rape, or driving. We pass laws against these choices to vulnerable people and discourage people from making those bad choices. Pro-life people believe that abortion act of lethal violence an innocent person so place in second category. this reason and this reason only do we think it should against the law. I think we have very good reasoning that and I would happy to share more that you; if you’re interested, It’s worth these choices drunk driving are against law, people still choose them but that doesn’t make mean those laws should be overturned and often need to do more to protect people just the law itself; for example, we need better education and promotion positive alternative You’re a Man/This is None of Your Business you’ve been paying very attention to the way the wind is blowing in abortion-choice you may noticed that there been a recent in how activists this argument. than “men stance on abortion, its a women’s they changed their messaging to both trans have female reproductive systems, and exclude pro-life women, because they have somehow finally realized that
, don’t have one!”—or they want to prEtend like pEople Are Pro-LiFe onLy beCause of religioUS docTrines and that religious Views ShOUldn’T ShApe puBlic polICy.

i’D LikE tO sHarE hOW I Think AboUt choicEs and would LikE tO hear if you diSAgRee with the Way i structure thIs iMportaNt DisTInctiOn. THere aRe some CHoices We can make ThAT are wrONg, but shOULdN’t be Against the law. They ARe PErsonal bad choiCes, but NoT ThE KInd Of aCtion that rEqUires OThers to STeP IN. an eXAmple of this kiNd of choice iS SomEthing LiKe iNFideliTy in aN eXCluSive relatioNshiP. If a husbaNd cheaTS on his wIFe, then yOu and I WouLd pRobaBLy AgRee ThAT he IS dOinG SomEthing wrOnG, bUt at tHe saME TIMe haVinG an aFfair Isn’t the type of ThiNg thAT shOuld gEt you ArreStEd and Thrown In jaiL. BUt there’s a differEnt kInd of “wronG acTiOn cAtEgory” THat you And i prObably aGree wheRE thE lAW SHoUld definitely step iN. CHOIcEs in this CategoRY aRe USually seVeRe, pUt otHERs in sIgniFIcAnt dangeR, or invOLvE vIolence AgAinst oThErs LikE domeSTic aBuse, raPe, or drunK drivINg. We pass laws agAInst these choiCEs TO PrOTect VulNerable peopLe anD DiscOuraGE pEopLE from MakinG tHOsE Bad choices. Pro-life peOpLe beliEve thAt abortion is aN act of lethAL VIolence aGainST aN Innocent person And so We place it iN The seconD cateGory. For tHis reason AND this reaSon OnlY do We tHINk It should be agaINSt thE lAw. I thinK we Have verY goOd rEasOniNg To defend tHat claim AnD I WoUlD be Happy TO share moRe AboUt ThaT with YOu; if yoU’re inTereStEd, MEssAge me!

It’S AlSO WortH nOtIng eVen ThRough ThesE Bad Choices Like drunk DriVIng aRe AgAinst thE law, people stiLl Choose them AnYwaY, but thAT Doesn’t maKe them bad laws. It doesn’t meAN those lAws ShoulD be oVerturned And Often wE neED to do mOre to pRotecT pEopLE BeyonD JUsT thE lAw itself; foR EXamPle, we NeEd beTter eduCation and promotion OF poSitive alternaTivE choICEs.

3: you’RE a mAn/THiS Is NONE of Your Business

if you’ve beeN pAYiNg very closE AttEnTion to tHe way thE wind IS blowinG in the aboRtion-choiCe MoveMENt, yOu may have nOticed thAt there haS Been a REcEnt shIft In how aCtIviSts arE makinG ThiS arguMent. RaThEr than AsserTiNg “men shoUldn’t take a stance on abortIon, its A womeN’s iSsue” they hAve CHanGed their mEssaGing to both IncLudE tranS meN, Who haVe feMAlE rePRoducTive SYstems, and EXcLudE PRo-Life women, beCAUSe tHey haVe sOMehow fInalLy realized that milLIons
, don’t have one!”—or they  want to p reten d l ike  p eopl e ar e pro-life onl y  bec ause of religious doct rines  a n d th a trelig ious vi e ws s hou ld n’ t s ha p epubli c p olicy.
I’d liketosh are how I th i nk  about cho ice s and wouldlik e to h ea r i f  youdis agree  witht he way  I struct ur e  thisi mportan t di stin ction. There ares om e  choices we ca n make  t h at a rewro ng, but sh ou ldn’t be agai n st t h e l a w. They are p ersonal bad cho ices,bu t n o t thekindof act ion that re quir es others  to st e p in. A n  exampl e of t his  ki nd o f  c ho ice  i s  so m et hin g  li ke infid el it y inan e x c l u sive  re lati onshi p. If a husba ndchea t s o n his  wife , th en  youand Iwould  p robably agree t hathe is doi ngso met hi ng wr o ng, bu t a t t he same  time h a vin ga n af fair isn’t the typ eo f  t hing tha t shou l dge t  you arr es ted  and t hrown  inj ai l. But t here’s adi fferent  k ind of  “ wro ngactio n  cat egory”  that yo u and I probably agr e e where the l a ws h ou l d de fin itely stepin.C hoic es i n  t his categ ory a re us u ally severe, put ot he rs insigni ficant danger , or invol v e violence  aga i ns t  others like d omest ic abuse,r ape, ordrunk  driving . We pass l aws agai nst  th ese  ch o i ce s to protectv u lner ab le peop leand dis cou rag e p eop le  from mak ing thos eba dch oic es. P r o-life p eo ple  b eli eve t h at abo rtion  isan  a c t o f letha l  v i o lenc eag ains t a ninnoc entp ers on andso we pla cei t in  t he  second  category. Fo rthis reaso nand  thisr e ason onl y do we think it should be agai nst  thelaw.  I thinkwehave v ery good r easoni ng to  d efe n d  that c la iman d I wouldb e  ha ppy t oshar e moreabout that with yo u ; i f you’re inte res ted, m es sag e  m e !
It ’ s a l s o worth notingeven throu gh th ese bad ch o ice slike dr unk dri vinga re agai nst the l aw, peopl estil l cho ose them a nyway, b ut that d o esn’t ma ke th embad la ws . I t doe sn’t m e anthose  lawssh ould b e ove rt urned an d often we need to do m ore to  prot ect  people b eyo n d j ust the l aw i tself; for  ex amp le, w e n e ed be tter ed uca t ion a nd p r omotion o f  p osi t i ve  alternativ e c hoi ces.
3: You’re  a M an/This is None o f  Your Business 

If y ou’ veb eenpa ying very clos e a tt e n tion toth e way the w ind is b lo w ing i n theaborti on-choi c e  m o vement , yo u m ay have n oti ce d  that t he re has be en a  r ecentshifti n ho w activists are ma kingt h is ar g ume nt. R at her tha n  ass erting “me n shouldn’t  takea st anceon abor ti on, it s a  w omen’s iss u e” they h ave c hangedth eirmes saging  tob o th in clud etra ns men, w h o  h a ve  f e mal e re produ ct ivesystems,a nd exclu dep ro-life  w ome n ,  becau s et h ey have so meh ow fi n a lly realiz e d th a tm illio ns
, don’t_have one!”—or_they want to pretend_like people_are_pro-life only_because_of religious doctrines_and that religious_views shouldn’t shape public_policy.

I’d like to_share_how I think about choices and would like to hear if you disagree with_the_way I_structure_this_important distinction. There are some_choices we can make that_are wrong,_but shouldn’t be against the law. They are_personal_bad choices, but_not the kind of action that requires others to_step in. An example of this_kind of choice_is_something_like infidelity in an_exclusive relationship. If a husband cheats_on his wife, then you and_I would probably agree that he is_doing something wrong, but at the_same time having an affair_isn’t the_type of thing that should_get you arrested_and thrown_in jail. But_there’s a different kind of “wrong_action category” that_you and I probably agree where_the_law should definitely_step_in._Choices in_this category are_usually_severe, put_others_in significant danger, or involve violence_against_others like domestic abuse, rape, or drunk_driving. We pass laws_against_these choices to protect_vulnerable people and discourage people_from making those bad choices. Pro-life_people believe_that abortion_is an act of lethal violence against an innocent person and_so we place it in the_second category. For this_reason and_this_reason only do_we_think it_should be against the law. I think_we have_very good reasoning to defend that_claim and I would_be_happy to share more about that_with you; if you’re interested, message_me!

It’s also worth noting even_through_these_bad choices like drunk driving_are against the law, people still_choose them anyway,_but that doesn’t make them bad laws._It_doesn’t mean those laws should be_overturned_and often we need to do_more_to_protect people beyond just the_law itself; for example, we need_better education and promotion of positive alternative choices.

3: You’re_a Man/This is_None of Your Business

If you’ve_been_paying_very close attention to the way the wind is blowing_in the_abortion-choice movement, you_may have noticed that there has been a recent shift_in how activists are making this argument._Rather than asserting “men shouldn’t take a stance on abortion, its_a women’s issue” they have changed their messaging_to both include trans men, who have_female reproductive systems, and_exclude_pro-life women, because they have somehow finally_realized_that_millions