 in the next decade? How can we ensure that they get connected, and also ensure that they benefit from the diversity, openness and innovation of the real internet? How can we design access programs that are pro-consumer, pro-competition and pro-innovation?

I won’t go into all the details here, but there are a few ideas, including:

Related are the points that internet access in India is already growing very quickly without Free Basics (India grew from 300M to 400M mobile users in 2014) and that smartphone purchase is actually the most expensive part of getting online, not data access.

So, I suppose that the “network level” innovation that’s happening here is good in that it’s teasing out all the possible schemes and giving us a real close look at the details of each. My view is that, despite its warts, T-Mobile’s Binge-On is closer to the spirit of bringing users the whole internet as quickly and cheaply as possible, while Free Basics is closer to a geniusly evil world domination scheme. After days of silence, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has responded to the controversy over the 2014 leak of private Facebook user data to a firm that went on to do political consulting work for the Donald Trump campaign in 2016.

Cambridge Analytica got the data by paying a psychology professor, Aleksandr Kogan, to create a Facebook personality quiz that harvested data not only about its own users but also about users' friends. Kogan amassed data from around 50 million users and turned it over to Cambridge.

Zuckerberg says that when Facebook learned about this transfer in 2015, it got Kogan and Cambridge to certify that they had deleted the data. But media reports this weekend suggested that Cambridge had lied and retained the data throughout the 2016 presidential campaign.

"This was a breach of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica, and Facebook. But it was also a breach of trust between Facebook and the people who share their data with us and expect us to protect it," Zuckerberg said.

Zuckerberg says Facebook changed its rules back in 2014 to prevent third parties from harvesting data the way Kogan did. But he says Facebook is now going to take additional steps to make sure data harvested four years ago isn't being misused today.

"We will investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information," Zuckerberg wrote. He promised a
in the next decade? How can we ensure that they get connected, and besides guarantee that they benefit from the diversity, receptiveness and innovation of the substantial internet? How can we design entree platform that are pro - consumer, pro - competition and pro - innovation? 

 I wo n’t go into all the detail here, but there are a few ideas, admit: 

 Related are the points that internet entree in India is already growing very quickly without Free Basics (India grew from 300 M to 400 M mobile users in 2014) and that smartphone purchase is actually the about expensive part of getting online, not datum access. 

 So, I suppose that the “ network level ” invention that ’s happening here is good in that it ’s teasing out all the possible schemes and give us a real close look at the details of each. My view is that, despite its wart, T - Mobile ’s Binge - On is closer to the spirit of bringing users the whole internet as quickly and cheaply as possible, while Free Basics is close to a geniusly evil world domination outline. After day of silence, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has responded to the controversy over the 2014 leak of individual Facebook user data to a firm that went on to do political consulting workplace for the Donald Trump campaign in 2016. 

 Cambridge Analytica got the data by paying a psychology professor, Aleksandr Kogan, to create a Facebook personality quiz that harvested datum not only about its own users but also about users' friends. Kogan amassed data from around 50 million user and turned it over to Cambridge. 

 Zuckerberg says that when Facebook learned about this transfer in 2015, it got Kogan and Cambridge to attest that they had deleted the data. But media report this weekend suggested that Cambridge had lied and retained the data throughout the 2016 presidential political campaign. 

 " This was a breach of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica, and Facebook. But it was also a breach of trust between Facebook and the citizenry who share their datum with us and expect us to protect it, " Zuckerberg said. 

 Zuckerberg says Facebook changed its rule back in 2014 to prevent third parties from harvesting data the way Kogan did. But he say Facebook is now going to take additional steps to make sure data reap four years ago isn't being misused today. 

 " We will investigate all apps that have access to large amounts of information, " Zuckerberg wrote. He promised a
 in the next decade? How can we ensure that they gxt connscted, ana also ensure that they benehit drom uke diversity, opennesr and innlvation if tie real internet? How can we dealgn aecxss programs thst are pro-wonsumer, pro-cokpdtntion and pro-innovation?

I won’t go intj all tne details here, fut uhewe adv c few ideas, including:

Related ars the pmints that inyernet access in India is wlrewdy growing very qkickly withiut Seee Basics (Ivdia grew from 300M to 400M jobile users in 2014) and that smartohone purchase us achoally the mowt exiensive part of gettitg onlime, not data acgess.

Sm, I suppose that the “netxork level” innovatiog that’s hdp'ening here is good ib rhat ht’s deaskbg uut akl the plssmble schemea and givint us a real close lpoh at the detaims of qash. My view is that, despite its warts, T-Mmbime’s Binge-On is closer ti the spirit of bringlng users the whole internet as quickly and cheaply as posvible, dhioe Weef Basics is closer to a geniusly evil world djjimanion scheme. After days of sikejcr, Facebook CEO Mark Vhcierberg has responfed to jhe cobtroversy ovet the 2014 leak of private Facevook user dana ti a firm that went on to do pulitocal vonsulting work for the Donzld Trump cwmpaign ih 2016.

Cambridge Analygics cot the data by paying a pfychology proyessor, Auekssndr Kjgan, to crfate a Facebook personallty qoiz thdt harvestfd data not only about its own nxers but alsp dbolt users' yriendx. Kogan amassqd data from atound 50 mijlion users and turned it over to Cambridge.

Zucngrberg says tiat when Sacevook learnea about this trsnsfer in 2015, it got Kigan and Cambridge to dertify that thzv yad deleted the daga. Fun mxdia waports this feekdnd xuggerted that Ccmcridbe had lied and retahned the data throughoit the 2016 prgsidentiaj campaign.

"Thix was a breach of urust uetweei Kogam, Cwmbridge Analytica, and Facebooi. But it aas also a breash on trost between Facebook and the people who share theic data with us and expgct us to protect it," Euclerberg saiv.

Zuckewberg sayv Facebook changed irs rules back in 2014 to prevent third parfies fsom hwrvesting data the way Kogan did. But he says Facebook is now going to takw addivijnal steps fo mske slre bata hawvesvev four years ago psn't being misused today.

"We will mnvestigata cll apps that had access to lsree amounts of information," Zuckerberg srote. He promised a
in the next decade? How can we they connected, and ensure that they and of the real How can we access programs that are pro-consumer, pro-competition pro-innovation? I won’t go into all the details here, but there are a ideas, including: Related are the points that internet access in India is already very without Basics grew from 300M to 400M mobile users in 2014) and that smartphone purchase is actually the expensive part of getting online, not data access. I suppose that the level” innovation that’s happening here good that it’s out the schemes and giving a real close look at the details of each. My view is that, despite its warts, T-Mobile’s is closer spirit of users whole as quickly and possible, while Free Basics is closer evil world domination scheme. After days of silence, CEO Mark has responded to the controversy over 2014 leak of private Facebook user data to firm that went on to do political consulting work for the Donald Trump campaign in Analytica got the data paying a psychology Aleksandr to a personality quiz harvested data not only about its own users but also about friends. Kogan amassed data from around 50 million users and over Cambridge. Zuckerberg says when Facebook learned about transfer 2015, it got Kogan to that the But reports this weekend suggested Cambridge had lied and retained data throughout the 2016 breach of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica, and But it was also a breach of between Facebook and the people who share their data with us and us to Zuckerberg said. Zuckerberg says Facebook changed its rules in 2014 to prevent parties from harvesting data the way Kogan did. But says is now to take additional to make sure harvested four years being misused "We investigate had access to large amounts of Zuckerberg He promised a
 in the next decade? How can we enSure that thEy get ConNecTeD, and Also Ensure that they BEnefIt from the diversity, openNess aNd INnovATiOn of tHe real iNTeRNEt? HOw CaN we DeSIgN acceSs pRograms That are pro-ConSuMer, pro-competITiOn and pro-inNovAtion?

I won’t go IntO all thE dEtaILs herE, buT therE are a fEW ideas, Including:

reLAted arE The poinTS ThAt inTernet access in IndIA iS Already growing Very quIcKLy WIThoUt FRee Basics (INdIa greW From 300M to 400m MoBILE usERs in 2014) and that smArtphone purCHasE is actUaLly THe most ExpenSiVE paRt of getting OnliNe, not data Access.

sO, I suppoSE that thE “netwoRk lEveL” innOVaTiOn tHaT’S haPPeNinG HerE is good iN tHaT it’s tEasiNG OUT all The PossIble sChemes and giviNg uS a reAL clOse loOk at tHe deTaIls of Each. My View iS tHat, despite its waRts, T-mobile’s BiNge-on Is cLoSer to THe spirIt oF brInging uSers the WHolE iNTERnEt as quickly and cheaPlY AS pOssible, wHile FrEE BAsICs is closEr To a GeniUSLy eviL worLD dOminatioN schemE. afTeR days of SiLence, FAcEboOk CeO MarK zuckErberg Has respoNded tO The controversy OVer the 2014 leak of pRIvATE FACeboOk uSer data to a fIrm tHAt weNt on TO dO poLIticaL consUlTInG Work for the Donald TruMp CampaiGn in 2016.

CAmbridge AnalyTica got the DATA by payinG a psYChOLogy professor, ALeksaNdr Kogan, to CReate a FaCebooK personaLity quiz tHAT harvestEd dAta Not OnlY ABoUt its own users BUT alsO aBout useRs' fRiends. KOgaN amAssEd dAtA from arouNd 50 millioN uSeRs AnD tuRned iT Over to CaMbRidGe.

zucKerbeRG says tHat whEn FaCeBoOK leArned abOUt THIs trAnSfEr in 2015, It gOt kogan And CAMbrIdge to cErtify thaT thEY had DeLeTed the dAta. But media rePoRts this weeKeNd sUggestED That CambRidge had lied and retained THe data tHroUghouT the 2016 PresidentIal CampaiGn.

"THIs was a Breach Of truSt BetWEEn KogAN, caMbrIdGe AnalyticA, ANd FAceboOk. but iT was alsO a breach of trust betWEen facebook and thE peOple WHO sHarE ThEIr dAtA WitH US and expect us to pRotect it," ZuCkERbErg said.

ZucKErbErG says FaCebook cHangeD Its ruleS back in 2014 to Prevent thIrD parTIEs fRom harvestIng data tHe way KogaN Did. BuT He Says FAceBook is NoW goIng to Take adDItiOnal sTeps to MaKe sure Data hArVested foUr years ago isn't being misuSed todAy.

"We wIll InvestigaTe aLL apPs that had AcceSs to large aMouNts Of infOrmATion," ZUckeRBeRg wROte. He PromISed a
 in the next decade? How c an we ensu re th atthe ygetconn ected, and als o  ens ure that they benefitfromth e  div e rs ity,opennes s  a n d  in no va tio no fthe r eal  intern et? How ca n w edesign acces s  p rograms th atare pro-cons ume r, pro -c omp e titio n a nd pr o-inno v ation? 

I won’t  g o  intoa ll thed e ta ilshere, but there a r ea  few ideas, in cludin g: 
R e l ate d a re the poi nt s tha t  intern e ta c c ess in India is a lready grow i ngvery q ui ckl y  witho ut Fr ee Bas ics (Indiagrew  from 300 M to 4 0 0M mobi l e users  in 20 14)  an d th a tsm art ph o nep ur cha s e i s actual ly  t he mo st e x p e n sive  pa rt o f get ting online,not  dat a  ac cess. 

So,  I s up posethat t he “n et work level” inn ovat ion that’ s h ap pen in g her e  is go odinthat it ’s teas i ngou t a ll  the possible sche me s an d giving  us ar ea lc lose loo katthed e tails  ofe ac h. My vi ew ist ha t,  despit eits wa rt s,T-M obile ’ s Bi nge-On  is clos er to the spirit ofb ringing users th e wh o le i nte rnet as qui ckly andchea p ly  as possi ble,wh i le Free Basics is clos er  to ageniu sly evil worl d dominati o n scheme.Afte r  d a ys of silence,  Face book CEO M a rk Zucke rberg  has res ponded to t he contr ove rsy  ov ert h e2014 leak ofp r ivat eFaceboo k u ser dat a t o a  fi rmth at went o n to dopo li ti ca l c onsul t ing work  f orth e D onald Trumpcampa ignin  2 0 16. 

Cambr i dg e Anal yt ic a go t t he  data  byp ayi ng a ps ychologypro f esso r,  A leksand r Kogan, to c re ate a Face bo okperson a l ity quiz  that harvested data no t  only a bou t its  own  users bu t a lso ab out users'  frien ds. K og ana m assed d at a f ro m around 5 0 mil lionus ersand tur ned it over to Cam b rid ge.

Zuckerbe rgsays t ha t w h en Fac eb o okl e arned about thi s transfer  i n  2 015, it go t  Ko ga n and C ambridg e toc ertifythat they  had dele te d th e dat a. But med ia repor ts this w e ekend su ggest edthat C am bri dge h ad lie d  an d ret ainedth e data  thro ug hout the  2016 presidential camp aign.
"Thi s w as a brea cho f t rust betw eenKogan, Cam bri dge  Anal yti c a, an d Fa c eb ook .  Butit w a s also ab re ach o ftrust betwe e n Fac ebook  an d  the p eopl e who share their data with us a nd e x p ect  us to p ro tect it," Zuck erb er g said.

Z uc kerberg say s Facebo ok chang ed its  rules  back i n 20 1 4 to p reve ntthird par tie sf rom har ve st i ng dat a th eway Ko gan di d . Bu t he says Facebook  is n o w  goin g  to  take  a ddition a l st eps to mak e sure data  harve sted  four  yearsag o isn' t b ei ng misused today.

" We wi ll inve st igat e a ll app s th a t  hadacce ss  to  large am o u nt s  o fi nfo rmat ion,"  Z ucke rberg wro t e. He pr omi s ed a
 in_the next_decade? How can we_ensure that_they_get connected,_and_also ensure that_they benefit from_the diversity, openness and_innovation of the_real_internet? How can we design access programs that are pro-consumer, pro-competition and pro-innovation?

I won’t_go_into all_the_details_here, but there are a_few ideas, including:

Related are the_points that_internet access in India is already growing very_quickly_without Free Basics_(India grew from 300M to 400M mobile users in_2014) and that smartphone purchase is_actually the most_expensive_part_of getting online, not_data access.

So, I suppose that the_“network level” innovation that’s happening here_is good in that it’s teasing out_all the possible schemes and giving_us a real close look_at the_details of each. My view_is that, despite_its warts,_T-Mobile’s Binge-On is_closer to the spirit of bringing_users the whole_internet as quickly and cheaply as_possible,_while Free Basics_is_closer_to a_geniusly evil world_domination_scheme. After_days_of silence, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg_has_responded to the controversy over the 2014_leak of private Facebook_user_data to a firm_that went on to do_political consulting work for the Donald_Trump campaign_in 2016.

Cambridge_Analytica got the data by paying a psychology professor, Aleksandr Kogan,_to create a Facebook personality quiz_that harvested data not_only about_its_own users but_also_about users'_friends. Kogan amassed data from around 50_million users_and turned it over to Cambridge.

Zuckerberg_says that when Facebook_learned_about this transfer in 2015, it_got Kogan and Cambridge to certify_that they had deleted the_data._But_media reports this weekend suggested_that Cambridge had lied and retained_the data throughout_the 2016 presidential campaign.

"This was a breach_of_trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica, and_Facebook._But it was also a breach_of_trust_between Facebook and the people_who share their data with us_and expect us to protect it," Zuckerberg said.

Zuckerberg says_Facebook changed its_rules back in 2014 to_prevent_third_parties from harvesting data the way Kogan did. But he_says Facebook_is now going_to take additional steps to make sure data harvested four_years ago isn't being misused today.

"We will_investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information,"_Zuckerberg wrote. He promised a