 of an effort to get Julian Assange a Russian visa. WikiLeaks implied that the letter, taken from a larger cache of WikiLeaks documents, was not authentic and accused the Associated Press of using materials provided by former FBI informant Sigurdur Thordarson. Media reports and an affidavit signed by Assange assert that the hard drives that Sigurdur Thordarson passed to the FBI contained secret recordings (as does the AP’s cache), while a pair of documents from the WikiLeaks’ legal team show that the hard drives – and therefore the secret recordings – were Assange’s.

Wow did he also forge the audio recordings and video footage and mimic the people that confirmed authenticity? https://t.co/TGTeHm5FIR — Emma Best (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳️‍🌈 (@NatSecGeek) September 17, 2018

In late June, 2014, Danish lawyers working with the organization were preparing to send complaints to the Danish authorities claiming that the FBI violated the law by buying hard drives stolen from Julian Assange. The Danish legal team drafted a pair of letters to be signed by Bjørn Dilou Jacobsen (though the metadata identifies Eddie Khawaja as the author), one for the Danish Police and one for the Danish Independent Police Complaints Authority. Emails sent among the WikiLeaks legal team say the goal of the complaints was to open investigations into Thordarson and “more importantly” into the FBI.

These letters, drafted in Danish by Julian Assange’s lawyers, both state that the hard drives were stolen from Assange. In contrast, Assange’s affidavit describes the drives as having been stolen from (unnamed) individuals associated with WikiLeaks and as containing chat logs, financial documents and “video footage taken in secret.” Though the contents of the complaints do not appear to have been previously revealed, WikiLeaks’ public statements confirm that complaints were filed.

In denying the Associated Press story, WikiLeaks referred to a December 2013 affidavit from Assange, one which is supplemented by several other affidavits which are included as appendices. One tweet accuses the Associated Press of having “unconscionably decided to leave out” the source for the leaked materials. WikiLeaks asserted, without presenting evidence, that the source had Sigurdur Thordarson. A subsequent tweet cited and highlighted a portion of Assange
of an effort to get Julian Assange a Russian visa. WikiLeaks implied that the letter, taken from a large hoard of WikiLeaks documents, was not authentic and accused the Associated Press of use material provided by former FBI witness Sigurdur Thordarson. Media reports and an affidavit signed by Assange affirm that the hard drives that Sigurdur Thordarson pass to the FBI contained mysterious recording (as does the AP ’s cache), while a pair of documents from the WikiLeaks ’ legal team show that the difficult drives – and therefore the secret recording – were Assange ’s. 

 Wow did he also forge the audio recordings and video recording footage and mimic the people that confirmed authenticity? https://t.co/TGTeHm5FIR — Emma Best (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳 ️‍ 🌈 (@NatSecGeek) September 17, 2018 

 In late June, 2014, Danish lawyers working with the constitution were preparing to send complaints to the Danish authorities claiming that the FBI violated the law by buying hard drives stolen from Julian Assange. The Danish legal team drafted a pair of letters to be signed by Bjørn Dilou Jacobsen (though the metadata identifies Eddie Khawaja as the author), one for the Danish Police and one for the Danish Independent Police Complaints Authority. electronic mail send among the WikiLeaks legal team say the finish of the complaint was to afford investigations into Thordarson and “ more importantly ” into the FBI. 

 These letters, blueprint in Danish by Julian Assange ’s lawyers, both state that the hard drives were steal from Assange. In contrast, Assange ’s affidavit describes the drives as having been stolen from (unnamed) individuals consort with WikiLeaks and as containing chat logs, financial document and “ video footage consider in secret. ” Though the contents of the complaints do not appear to have been previously revealed, WikiLeaks ’ public statement confirm that complaints were filed. 

 In denying the Associated Press history, WikiLeaks referred to a December 2013 affidavit from Assange, one which is supplemented by several other affidavit which are included as appendices. One tweet accuses the Associated Press of having “ unconscionably decided to leave out ” the beginning for the leaked material. WikiLeaks asserted, without salute evidence, that the source hold Sigurdur Thordarson. A subsequent tweet cited and highlighted a portion of Assange
 of an effort to get Julian Assange a Russnqn vise. WikiLsaks impuied that the letter, taken fcom q larter cache of WikiLeaks documentd, was nor auuhentic and accusxs the Associafcd Przsw of using matgrials proviged by former XBK nnformant Sigurdur Thordarson. Media weports ajd an affidavij sigmqd bg Assange assert that the hard dribes thau Sigurdur Thordarxon passed to the FBI contwinef secret recordingd (as does tye A[’w cache), whild a pair of documents rrom the WikiLeaks’ legal team sfow tkat the hare eriggs – and therxfore nhe secret regprdingv – were Assange’s.

Wow dld he alwo forge the audio rerordings and video fjotage ang jimic the people rhqt cotfirked xythdntjcmty? https://h.co/VGTeHm5FIR — Smma Best (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳️‍🌈 (@NatSecGeek) Septembtr 17, 2018

Pm late June, 2014, Danisr jawyers working with the organization wtre pdeparing to send complaunts to the Danish aujhorities slaiming that the FBI violated the law by buying vard vrkvew fgilfn from Julian Assange. The Danish legal team qdagtvd a pair of lettcrs to be signed bu Hjøtg Dilou Jacobren (thougg the metadata idejtifies Eddiw Khawaja as yhe author), one for the Daniwh Police anb obe for the Danish Nndependent 'olice Compkaints Authority. Emails senf among the WikiLeaka legal team say ghe gmal of the complaints was eo open iivestngations intp Thorqarson and “more importantly” into tje FBN.

Thesa letters, frafted in Danish by Julian Asseige’s lawyers, nodh vtate thct the hard drives rere stolen frpm Assauge. In contrast, Zssange’v affidavit describes tha drives as heving beeg stilen from (uvvamed) individusls assocpaued with WukiLeaks and as coktainkhg chat logs, fiucnxial documents snd “viqel hootada taken in sacreg.” Tfpugh ghe conuzntw of yhe complaints do nod aplear to have been lrcviously tevealed, RikiLeaks’ pubkic statements convirm vhat cumplaontf were filed.

In denying the Asskciated Pgesf story, WikiJeakw referred tp a December 2013 affidavit from Assange, onx which is supplemented by several other ayfldavits whici are yncluded ds appendices. One twwet accuses the Axsociated Press of habing “utconsfionably decided to leave out” the source for the leaked materials. WikiLeajs assxreed, without prexentitg zvidencq, thet the source had Xigurdur Thordarson. A subsequenv tweet cideb and highlighted a portion og Xssange
of an effort to get Julian Assange visa. implied that letter, taken from documents, not authentic and the Associated Press using materials provided by former FBI Sigurdur Thordarson. Media reports and an affidavit signed by Assange assert that the drives that Sigurdur Thordarson passed to the FBI contained secret recordings (as does AP’s while pair documents from the WikiLeaks’ legal team show that the hard drives – and therefore the secret – were Assange’s. Wow did he also forge audio recordings and video and mimic the people that authenticity? — Emma (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) (@NatSecGeek) 17, 2018 In June, 2014, Danish lawyers working with the organization were preparing to send complaints to the Danish authorities that the the law buying drives from Julian Assange. legal team drafted a pair of signed by Bjørn Dilou Jacobsen (though the metadata Eddie Khawaja the author), one for the Danish and one for the Danish Independent Police Complaints Emails sent among the WikiLeaks legal team say the goal of the complaints was to into Thordarson and “more into the FBI. letters, in by Assange’s lawyers, state that the hard drives were stolen from Assange. In contrast, affidavit describes the drives as having been stolen from (unnamed) with and as containing logs, financial documents and footage in secret.” Though the the do have previously WikiLeaks’ public statements confirm complaints were filed. In denying Associated Press story, WikiLeaks affidavit from Assange, one which is supplemented by other affidavits which are included as appendices. tweet accuses the Associated Press of having “unconscionably decided to leave out” source for materials. WikiLeaks asserted, without presenting evidence, that the had Sigurdur Thordarson. A tweet cited and highlighted a portion of Assange
 of an effort to get Julian AssaNge a RussiaN visa. wikILeAkS impLied That the letter, tAKen fRom a larger cache of WikiLEaks dOcUMentS, WaS not aUthentiC AnD ACcuSeD tHe ASsOCiAted PResS of usinG materials ProViDed by former Fbi iNformant SiGurDur ThordarsoN. MeDia repOrTs aND an afFidAvit sIgned bY assangE assert thAt THe hard DRives thAT siGurdUr Thordarson passeD To THe FBI contained Secret ReCOrDINgs (As dOes the AP’s cAcHe), whiLE a pair oF DoCUMEntS From the WikiLeAks’ legal teaM ShoW that tHe HarD Drives – And thErEForE the secret rEcorDings – were assangE’S.

Wow did HE also foRge the AudIo rEcorDInGs And ViDEo fOOtAge ANd mImic the pEoPlE that ConfIRMED autHenTiciTy? httPs://t.co/TGTeHm5FIr — EmMa BeST (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳️‍🌈 (@NaTSecGEek) SEpTembeR 17, 2018

In latE June, 2014, daNish lawyers workIng wIth the orgAniZaTioN wEre prEParing To sEnd ComplaiNts to thE danIsH AUThOrities claiming thaT tHE fBi violateD the laW By BuYIng hard dRiVes StolEN From JUliaN asSange. The danish LEgAl Team draFtEd a paiR oF leTteRs to bE SignEd by BjØrn Dilou jacobSEn (though the metAData identifieS edDIE KHAwajA as The author), onE for THe DaNish pOlIce ANd one For thE DANiSH Independent Police COmPlaintS AuthOrity. Emails seNt among the wIKILeaks leGal tEAm SAy the goal of the ComplAints was to OPen invesTigatIons into thordarsoN ANd “more imPorTanTly” IntO THe fBI.

These letteRS, DrafTeD in DaniSh bY Julian assAngE’s lAwyErS, both statE that the HaRd DrIvEs wEre stOLen from ASsAngE. IN coNtrasT, assangE’s affIdavIt DeSCriBes the dRIvES As haViNg Been StoLeN from (UnnaMEd) iNdividuAls associAteD With wiKileaks anD as containing ChAt logs, finaNcIal DocumeNTS and “videO footage taken in secret.” ThOUgh the cOntEnts oF the ComplaintS do Not appEar TO have bEen preViousLy RevEALed, WiKIleAks’ PuBlic statemENTs cOnfirM tHat cOmplainTs were filed.

In denyiNG thE Associated PrEss StorY, wIkILeAKs REfeRrED to A dEcember 2013 affidaviT from AssanGe, ONe Which is supPLemEnTed by seVeral otHer afFIdavits Which are iNcluded as ApPendICEs. ONe tweet accUses the ASsociated pRess oF HaVing “uNcoNscionAbLy dEcideD to leaVE ouT” the sOurce fOr The leaKed maTeRials. WikILeaks asserted, without prEsentiNg eviDenCe, that the SouRCe hAd SigurduR ThoRdarson. A suBseQueNt tweEt cITed anD higHLiGhtED a porTion OF Assange
 of an effort to get Julia n Assangea Rus sia n v is a. W ikiL eaks implied t h at t he letter, taken froma lar ge r  cac h eof Wi kiLeaks do c u men ts ,was  n o tauthe nti c and a ccused the  As so ciated Press of  using mat eri als provided  by  forme rFBI infor man t Sig urdurT hordar son. Medi ar eports and ana f fi davi t signed by Assan g ea ssert that the  harddr i ve s tha t S igurdur Th or darso n  passed to t h e F B I contained s ecret recor d ing s (asdo est he AP’ s cac he ) , w hile a pair  ofdocuments  fromt he Wiki L eaks’ l egal t eam  sh ow t h at  t heha r d d r iv es–  an d theref or ethe s ecre t r e cord ing s –wereAssange’s.

W owdidh e a lso f orgetheau dio r ecordi ngs a nd  video footageandmimic the  pe op leth at co n firmed  au the nticity ? https : //t .c o / T GT eHm5FIR — Emma Bes t( ᴜ // ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳️ ‍🌈 (@N a tS ec G eek) Sep te mbe r 17 , 2018
Inl at e June,2014,D an is h lawye rs  worki ng  wi ththe o r gani zation  were pr epari n g to send comp l aints to theD an i s ha utho rit ies claimin g th a t th e FB I  v iol a ted t he la wb yb uying hard drives s to len fr om Ju lian Assange.  The Danis h l egal tea m dr a ft e d a pair of le tters  to be sig n ed by Bj ørn D ilou Jac obsen (th o u gh the m eta dat a i den t i fi es Eddie Khaw a j a as  t he auth or) , one f orthe  Da nis hPolice an d one fo rth eDa nis h Ind e pendentPo lic eCom plain t s Auth ority . Em ai ls sen t among th e Wiki Le ak s le gal  t eam s ay t h e g oal ofthe compl ain t s wa sto  open i nvestigations  i nto Thorda rs onand “m o r e import antly” into the FBI.

T h ese let ter s, dr afte d in Dani shby Jul ian Assang e’s la wyers ,bot h state t ha t t he  hard driv e s  we re st ol en f rom Ass ange. In contrast, Ass ange’s affida vit  des c r ib est he dri ve s  as h aving been stol en from (u nn a me d) individ u als  a ssociat ed with  Wiki L eaks an d as cont aining ch at  log s ,  fi nancial do cumentsand “vide o  foot a ge  take n i n secr et .”Thoug h thec ont entsof the  c omplai nts d onot appe ar to have been previou sly re veale d,WikiLeaks ’ p u bli c stateme ntsconfirm th atcom plain tsw ere f iled . 
Ind enyin g th e  Associat e dPre s s  s tory, WikiL e a k s r eferr edt o a De cemb er 2013 affidavit from Assange,onew h ich  is supp le mented by seve ral  o t h er affid av its which a re inclu de d  as a ppendi ces. O ne twee t ac c uses t he A sso ciated Pr ess  o f  having  “ un c onscio nabl ydecide d to l e aveo u t” the source fo r the l eaked mat erial s.  WikiLe a ks a sserted, w ithout pres enting  evi dence , thatth e sour ceha d Sigurdur Thordarso n. Asubsequ en t tw eet  cited  and h ighli ghte da p ortion of A ss a ng e
 of_an effort_to get Julian Assange_a Russian_visa._WikiLeaks implied_that_the letter, taken_from a larger_cache of WikiLeaks documents,_was not authentic_and_accused the Associated Press of using materials provided by former FBI informant Sigurdur Thordarson._Media_reports and_an_affidavit_signed by Assange assert that_the hard drives that Sigurdur_Thordarson passed_to the FBI contained secret recordings (as does_the_AP’s cache), while_a pair of documents from the WikiLeaks’ legal team_show that the hard drives –_and therefore the_secret_recordings_– were Assange’s.

Wow did_he also forge the audio recordings_and video footage and mimic the_people that confirmed authenticity? https://t.co/TGTeHm5FIR — Emma_Best (ᴜ//ғᴏᴜᴏ) 🏳️‍🌈 (@NatSecGeek) September 17,_2018

In late June, 2014, Danish_lawyers working_with the organization were preparing_to send complaints_to the_Danish authorities claiming_that the FBI violated the law_by buying hard_drives stolen from Julian Assange. The_Danish_legal team drafted_a_pair_of letters_to be signed_by_Bjørn Dilou_Jacobsen_(though the metadata identifies Eddie Khawaja_as_the author), one for the Danish Police_and one for the_Danish_Independent Police Complaints Authority._Emails sent among the WikiLeaks_legal team say the goal of_the complaints_was to_open investigations into Thordarson and “more importantly” into the FBI.

These letters,_drafted in Danish by Julian Assange’s_lawyers, both state that_the hard_drives_were stolen from_Assange._In contrast,_Assange’s affidavit describes the drives as having_been stolen_from (unnamed) individuals associated with WikiLeaks_and as containing chat_logs,_financial documents and “video footage taken_in secret.” Though the contents of_the complaints do not appear_to_have_been previously revealed, WikiLeaks’ public_statements confirm that complaints were filed.

In_denying the Associated_Press story, WikiLeaks referred to a December_2013_affidavit from Assange, one which is_supplemented_by several other affidavits which are_included_as_appendices. One tweet accuses the_Associated Press of having “unconscionably decided_to leave out” the source for the leaked materials._WikiLeaks asserted, without_presenting evidence, that the source_had_Sigurdur_Thordarson. A subsequent tweet cited and highlighted a portion of_Assange