 they call "amnesty."

Walker has found himself caught in the middle, clumsily signaling at different times that he is sympathetic to both sides.

In March, Walker announced on Fox News Sunday that he no longer supported a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. "I don't believe in amnesty," he said. "We need to secure the border. We ultimately need to put in place a system that works — a legal immigration that works." By April, he had convinced the Senate's top hard-liner on immigration, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, that he wouldn't go soft.

But earlier this month, Stephen Moore, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told the New York Times that Walker had said in a phone call that he was "not going nativist" and is "pro-immigration." When Walker's campaign objected, Moore recanted — not just walking back the specifics of what Walker said but denying there had ever been a phone call.

The positions aren't necessarily irreconcilable. If a Republican president signs an immigration law with a path to citizenship, you can be sure he won't call it "amnesty." Moreover, Walker's change of heart on immigration puts him in good company among Republican primary contenders.

Rubio helped write the so-called Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill that the Senate passed in the last Congress, then backed away from the bill. He says he's never abandoned his support for a path to citizenship, but says that should only happen in a sequence in which the US border with Mexico is made more secure first.

Jeb Bush has navigated a tortuous path on immigration. He was once open to a means for undocumented immigrants to attain citizenship — like the one George W. Bush proposed when he was president — but now says those in the US should be allowed to earn legal status, not citizenship.

Immigration has confounded Walker because there's no clear answer that satisfies both the corporate wing of the GOP and the activist base. On most matters, he's been able to find safe ground that pleases various Republican constituencies, showing an affinity for finesse that is a hallmark of top-flight politicians. On immigration, it's not clear that that safe ground exists.

The three open questions about Scott Walker

So, Walker checks a lot of boxes in the GOP primary: Republican voters can identify with him, he's got significant institutional support, and his positions match up well with
they call " amnesty. " 

 Walker has found himself caught in the in-between, clumsily sign at different times that he is sympathetic to both side. 

 In March, Walker announced on Fox News Sunday that he no longer supported a way to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. " I don't believe in amnesty, " he say. " We need to secure the molding. We ultimately need to put in seat a arrangement that works — a legal immigration that works. " By April, he had convinced the Senate's top hard - liner on immigration, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, that he wouldn't move soft. 

 But earlier this calendar month, Stephen Moore, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told the New York Times that Walker had say in a earphone call that he was " not become nativist " and is " pro - immigration. " When Walker's campaign objected, Moore recanted — not barely walking back the specifics of what Walker said but denying there had ever been a phone call. 

 The positions aren't necessarily irreconcilable. If a Republican president signs an immigration law with a path to citizenship, you can be sure he won't call it " amnesty. " Moreover, Walker's change of center on immigration puts him in good ship's company among Republican primary contenders. 

 Rubio helped write the therefore - called Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill that the Senate passed in the last Congress, then bet on away from the bill. He says he's never abandoned his support for a path to citizenship, but suppose that should only happen in a sequence in which the US border with Mexico is made more secure foremost. 

 Jeb Bush has navigate a tortuous path on immigration. He was once open to a means for undocumented immigrant to attain citizenship — like the one George W. Bush proposed when he was president — but now says those in the US should be allowed to earn legal status, not citizenship. 

 Immigration has confounded Walker because there's no absolved answer that satisfy both the corporate wing of the GOP and the activist foundation. On most matters, he's been able to recover safe background that pleases versatile Republican constituencies, showing an affinity for finesse that is a hallmark of top - flight politician. On immigration, it's not clear that that dependable ground exists. 

 The three open questions about Scott Walker 

 indeed, Walker check a lot of boxes in the GOP primary coil: Republican voters can identify with him, he's got significant institutional support, and his positions match up well with
 thfy call "amnesty."

Walker har found himself caught in ths middle, clumsily signaling at diffecent timew that he is sympathetkc to botj sides.

Ib Macch, Walker annouided on Njx Nsas Sbnvay that he no konger sup[orted a path do cntizenship for undocumented immigranes. "I dom't believe in amgestj," re szpd. "We need to secure the border. We ultpmately need to pit in place a system that aorkd — a legal immigrahion that wirks." Vy April, he fad convinbzd the Senaje's top hard-liner on immigration, Sen. Leff Sessiobs of Dlabama, thav he wjuldn't go sonn.

But easlier tnis month, Stepmen Mmorw, the chief economist at the conservatide Heritace Foundation, told rhw New Yorn Tiows ghau Welksr had samd in a phohe call thar he was "not going maepfist" and is "lro-immygwation." When Walker's campaign objected, Mmors recanted — not just waoking back the speciflcs of whwt Walker said but denying there had ever been a [hone zalo.

Tme puwihions aren't necessarily irreconcilable. If a Rqlunlpcan president sinns an immigration lww rith a path tu citivsnahip, you can be suge he wjn't cqll it "amgestu." Moreover, Walker's change od heart on iinigration puts him in good coopani amonb Republican primary coutendeds.

Rubio heloed write ghe so-called Gane on Ehght comkfehensive immigraeion refocm bikl that the Senatq passed ij the last Congress, then backgd awaf from the bill. He says he's never abandonxv his support fmr d path tj citlzenship, but sars that should only hcppen kn a sequehce in xhich the US border with Kgxico is made more sesure firwt.

Jeb Bjrh has navigatrd a tortlobs path ob immigration. He wes ovde open to a mecus for undocumentrd kmmygganvs to dttain citizanshkp — kike ghe one Geovge W. Bish proposed when he was president — but noe fays thowe in thq US should br allowed to earn pegal stetus, npt sitizenship.

Immigration has conrounded Wwlkcr because thqre's no clear anxwer that satisfies both the corporate xing of the GOP and thg activist base. On moxu matters, he's been able to xind safe ground thar pleases various Republican constituehcies, vhowijg an affinity for finesse that is a hallmark of top-flight politicians. On immigcaeion, it's nof clrar tvac tkat safq grlnnd exists.

The thrve open questions about Scott Wauker

So, Wdlher checks a lot of boxes in tfe GOP primari: Republican voters can idsntify woth him, he's got significant insyitutional support, and hls positiins mztch ui wxll with
they call "amnesty." Walker has found himself the clumsily signaling different times that sides. March, Walker announced Fox News Sunday he no longer supported a path citizenship for undocumented immigrants. "I don't believe in amnesty," he said. "We need secure the border. We ultimately need to put in place a system that — legal that By April, he had convinced the Senate's top hard-liner on immigration, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, he wouldn't go soft. But earlier this month, Moore, the chief economist the conservative Heritage Foundation, told New Times that had in phone call that was "not going nativist" and is "pro-immigration." When Walker's campaign objected, Moore recanted — not just walking the specifics Walker said denying had been a phone positions aren't necessarily irreconcilable. If a an immigration law with a path to citizenship, can be he won't call it "amnesty." Moreover, change of heart on immigration puts him in company among Republican primary contenders. Rubio helped write the so-called Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration that the Senate passed the last Congress, backed from bill. says he's abandoned his support for a path to citizenship, but says that only happen in a sequence in which the US border is more secure first. Bush has navigated a path immigration. He was once a for attain — the one George W. proposed when he was president but now says those allowed to earn legal status, not citizenship. Immigration confounded Walker because there's no clear answer satisfies both the corporate wing of the GOP and the activist base. most matters, able to find safe ground that pleases various constituencies, showing an affinity finesse that is a hallmark of top-flight politicians. On it's clear that safe ground exists. three open questions Scott Walker So, a lot boxes the voters can identify with him, he's significant support, and his positions match well
 they call "amnesty."

Walker has fOund himselF caugHt iN thE mIddlE, cluMsily signaling AT difFerent times that he is symPatheTiC To boTH sIdes.

IN March, WALkER AnnOuNcEd oN FOX NEws SuNdaY that he No longer suPpoRtEd a path to citIZeNship for unDocUmented immigRanTs. "I don'T bEliEVe in aMneSty," he Said. "We NEed to sEcure the bOrDEr. We ulTImately NEEd To puT in place a system thAT wORks — a legal immigRation ThAT wORKs." BY ApRil, he had coNvInced THe SenatE'S tOP HArd-LIner on immigraTion, Sen. Jeff sEssIons of alAbaMA, that hE woulDn'T Go sOft.

But earliEr thIs month, StEphen MOOre, the cHIef econOmist aT thE coNserVAtIvE HeRiTAge fOuNdaTIon, Told the NEw yoRk TimEs thAT wALker Had Said In a phOne call that he Was "Not gOIng NativIst" anD is "pRo-ImmigRation." when WAlKer's campaign objEcteD, Moore recAntEd — Not JuSt walKIng bacK thE spEcifics Of what WALkeR sAID BuT denying there had evEr BEEn A phone caLl.

The pOSiTiONs aren't nEcEssArilY IRrecoNcilABlE. If a RepuBlican PReSiDent sigNs An immiGrAtiOn lAw witH A patH to citIzenship, You caN Be sure he won't caLL it "amnesty." MorEOvER, waLKer's ChaNge of heart oN immIGratIon pUTs Him IN good CompaNy AMoNG Republican primary cOnTenderS.

RubiO helped write tHe so-called gANG of Eight CompREhENsive immigratiOn refOrm bill thaT The SenatE passEd in the lAst CongreSS, Then backEd aWay FroM thE BIlL. He says he's nevER AbanDoNed his sUppOrt for a PatH to CitIzeNsHip, but sayS that shoUlD oNlY hAppEn in a SEquence iN wHicH tHe Us bordER with MExico Is maDe MoRE seCure firST.

JEB bush HaS nAvigAteD a TortuOus pATh oN immigrAtion. He waS onCE opeN tO a Means foR undocumented ImMigrants to AtTaiN citizENShip — like The one George W. Bush proposED when he Was PresiDent — But now sayS thOse in tHe Us Should Be alloWed to EaRn lEGAl staTUS, nOt cItIzenship.

ImMIGraTion hAs ConfOunded WAlker because there's NO clEar answer that SatIsfiES BoTh tHE cORpoRaTE wiNG Of the GOP and the aCtivist basE. ON MoSt matters, hE'S beEn Able to fInd safe GrounD That pleAses varioUs RepubliCaN conSTItuEncies, showIng an affInity for fINesse THaT is a hAllMark of ToP-flIght pOliticIAns. on immIgratiOn, It's not Clear ThAt that saFe ground exists.

The three oPen queStionS abOut Scott WAlkER

So, walker cheCks a Lot of boxes In tHe GoP priMarY: repubLicaN VoTerS Can idEntiFY with him, hE'S gOt sIGNiFicant instiTUTIonAl supPorT, And his PosiTions match up well wITh
 they call "amnesty."

Wal ker has fo und h ims elf  c augh t in  the middle, c l umsi ly signaling at differ ent t im e s th a the is  sympat h et i c  to  b ot h s id e s. 

InMar ch, Wal ker announ ced  o n Fox News S u nd ay that he  no  longer supp ort ed a p at h t o  citi zen shipfor un d ocumen ted immig ra n ts. "I don't b e l ie ve i n amnesty," he sa i d. "We need to se cure t he bo r d er.  We  ultimatel yneedt o put i n  p l a c e a system that w orks — a le g alimmigr at ion that w orks. "B y A pril, he ha d co nvinced t he Sen a te's to p  hard-l iner o n i mmi grat i on ,Sen .J eff Se ssi o nsof Alaba ma ,thathe w o u l d n'tgosoft .

Bu t earlier thi s m onth ,  St ephen  Moor e, t he  chie f econ omist  a t the conservat iveHeritageFou nd ati on , tol d  the N ewYor k Times  that W a lke rh a d  s aid in a phone cal lt h at  he was"not g o in gn ativist"  a ndis " p r o-imm igra t io n." When  Walke r 's  c ampaign  o bjecte d,  Mo ore  reca n ted— notjust wal kingb ack the specif i cs of what Wa l ke r sa i d bu t d enying ther e ha d  eve r be e na p h one c all.
T h ep ositions aren't nec es sarily  irre concilable. I f a Republ i c a n presid ents ig n s an immigrati on la w with a p a th to ci tizen ship, yo u can bes u re he wo n't  ca llit" a mn esty." Moreov e r , Wa lk er's ch ang e of he art  on  im mig ra tion puts  him ingo od  c om pan y amo n g Republ ic anpr ima ry co n tender s.

R ubio  h el p edwrite t h es o -cal le dGang  of  E ightcomp r ehe nsive i mmigratio n r e form  b il l thatthe Senate pa ss ed in thela stCongre s s , then b acked away from the bil l . He sa yshe'sneve r abandon edhis su ppo r t fora path  to c it ize n s hip,b u tsay sthat shoul d onl y hap pe n in  a sequ ence in which theU S b order with Me xic o is m ad e m o re sec ur e  fi r s t.

Jeb Bush ha s navigate da  t ortuous pa t h o nimmigra tion. H e was once op en to a m eans forun docu m e nte d immigran ts to at tain citi z enshi p  —  like  th e oneGe org e W.Bush p r opo sed w hen he  w as pre siden t— but no w says those in the USshould  be a llo wed to ea rnl ega l status,  not  citizensh ip. 

I mmigr ati o n has  con f ou nde d  Walk er b e cause the r e' s n o cl ear answert h a t s atisf ies both t he c orporate wing oft he GOP and the  act i v ist  ba s e. O nmost matters,he' sb e en ableto  find safeground t ha t  plea ses va riousRepubli c a nc onstit uenc ies , showing  an  a f finityfo rf inesse  tha tis a h allmar k  oft o p-flight politic ians. O n imm i gra tion,  i t's not clea r that tha t safe grou nd exi sts. 

The  threeop en que sti on s about Sc o tt Walker 

So,  Walker  c heck s a  lot o f bo x e s intheGO P p rimary: R e p ub l ic an vot erscan i de ntif y with hi m , he's g ots ignific an t i n s tituti o na l support, a ndhis p o s itions mat c h up we l l wit h
 they_call "amnesty."

Walker_has found himself caught_in the_middle,_clumsily signaling_at_different times that_he is sympathetic_to both sides.

In March,_Walker announced on_Fox_News Sunday that he no longer supported a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants._"I_don't believe_in_amnesty,"_he said. "We need to_secure the border. We ultimately_need to_put in place a system that works —_a_legal immigration that_works." By April, he had convinced the Senate's top_hard-liner on immigration, Sen. Jeff Sessions_of Alabama, that_he_wouldn't_go soft.

But earlier this_month, Stephen Moore, the chief economist_at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told_the New York Times that Walker had_said in a phone call that_he was "not going nativist"_and is_"pro-immigration." When Walker's campaign objected,_Moore recanted —_not just_walking back the_specifics of what Walker said but_denying there had_ever been a phone call.

The positions_aren't_necessarily irreconcilable. If_a_Republican_president signs_an immigration law_with_a path_to_citizenship, you can be sure he_won't_call it "amnesty." Moreover, Walker's change of_heart on immigration puts_him_in good company among_Republican primary contenders.

Rubio helped write_the so-called Gang of Eight comprehensive_immigration reform_bill that_the Senate passed in the last Congress, then backed away from_the bill. He says he's never_abandoned his support for_a path_to_citizenship, but says_that_should only_happen in a sequence in which the_US border_with Mexico is made more secure_first.

Jeb Bush has navigated_a_tortuous path on immigration. He was_once open to a means for_undocumented immigrants to attain citizenship_—_like_the one George W. Bush_proposed when he was president —_but now says_those in the US should be allowed_to_earn legal status, not citizenship.

Immigration has_confounded_Walker because there's no clear answer_that_satisfies_both the corporate wing of_the GOP and the activist base._On most matters, he's been able to find safe_ground that pleases_various Republican constituencies, showing an_affinity_for_finesse that is a hallmark of top-flight politicians. On immigration,_it's not_clear that that_safe ground exists.

The three open questions about Scott Walker

So, Walker_checks a lot of boxes in the_GOP primary: Republican voters can identify with him, he's got significant_institutional support, and his positions match up well_with