 masses of population among the territories like herds of cattle, they are handled like stocks of mad commodities, of prisoners of war, of political internees, of invading fugitives, of landless refugees, migrant proletarians; the Peplos of Liberty to which incense burns is now woven with barbed wire.

As for the extension of territory, the ancient world presents us with small state units reduced to the city and large empires derived from military conquests, The Middle Ages show us small autonomous municipalities and large state complexes. The capitalist world offers, instead, the decidedly uninterrupted concentration on immense extensions of state units, and the increasingly total domination of the great over the small.

This process is entirely parallel to the increase in interference by the state machine in all phases of the lives of the populations it dominates, to the spread of such influence from the political sphere, of police, juridical, always more explicitly and suffocatingly to the social, economic and physical.

Already in State and Revolution (Chap. II section 2) Lenin gives of this internal process a decisive analysis referred to all the countries of Europe and America, and especially to the more parliamentary and republican.

“Imperialism–the era of bank capital, the era of gigantic capitalist monopolies, of the development of monopoly capitalism into state-monopoly capitalism–has clearly shown an unprecedented growth in its bureaucratic and military apparatus in connection with the intensification of repressive measures against the proletariat both in the monarchical and in the freest, republican countries”.

Words written in 1917.

The substantial lie of the juridical and political construction proper to the dominant bourgeoisie can only be highlighted by recalling the presentation of the two world wars as struggles for the demands of autonomy and freedom of individuals, of ethnic and national groups, of small states in their unlimited sovereignty. Instead, they were gigantic and bloody stages in the concentration of state power and capitalist domination.

In the theory of bourgeois law, as the individual is protected by a series of illusory prerogatives in the face of public power, namely the right to think, speak, write, associate, vote, in any direction – but not to eat! The hungry could choose the table where the selfless body of the Solons sits! – so it is claimed that within its territorial boundaries, to travel them ten or ten thousand kilometres, every state is sovereign and can administer itself as it wishes.


masses of population among the territories like herds of cattle, they are handled like stock of mad commodities, of prisoner of war, of political internees, of invade fugitives, of landless refugees, migrant proletarian; the Peplos of Liberty to which incense burn is now weave with barbed wire. 

 As for the extension of district, the ancient world presents us with small state unit reduced to the city and big empires derived from military conquest, The Middle Ages show us small autonomous municipalities and big state complexes. The capitalist world offer, instead, the decidedly uninterrupted concentration on immense extensions of department of state units, and the increasingly total domination of the great over the small. 

 This process is entirely parallel to the increase in interference by the state machine in all phases of the lives of the populations it dominates, to the spread of such influence from the political sphere, of police, juridical, constantly more explicitly and suffocatingly to the social, economic and physical. 

 Already in State and Revolution (Chap. II section 2) Lenin feed of this inner process a decisive analysis refer to all the countries of Europe and America, and especially to the more parliamentary and republican. 

 “ Imperialism – the era of bank das kapital, the era of gigantic capitalist monopolies, of the development of monopoly capitalism into state - monopoly capitalism – has clearly shown an unprecedented growth in its bureaucratic and military apparatus in connection with the intensification of repressive measures against the proletariat both in the monarchal and in the freest, republican area ”. 

 Words written in 1917. 

 The substantial lie of the juridical and political construction proper to the dominant middle class can only be highlighted by recalling the presentation of the two world wars as struggles for the demands of autonomy and freedom of individual, of ethnic and home groups, of small states in their unlimited sovereignty. alternatively, they were gigantic and bloody stagecoach in the concentration of department of state power and capitalist domination. 

 In the hypothesis of bourgeois law, as the individual is protected by a series of illusory prerogatives in the face of public power, namely the right to think, speak, write, companion, vote, in any direction – but not to feed! The hungry could choose the table where the selfless body of the Solons sits! – so it is claimed that within its territorial limit, to travel them ten or ten thousand kilometres, every state is sovereign and can administer itself as it wishes.
 madses of population among the territories like ierds or cattle, they are handled like stockd if mae commodities, of prisovers of wwr, of pooitiral internees, of invadinn fugjbives, if landless renugees, migrdnt proletariats; tke Peplos of Liberty to which incensq burns id now woven wijh bagbqd wjge.

Cs for the extension of territody, the encient world ptesents us with small statf unlts reduced to the city and lqrge wmpires derixed from mpnitary consuests, The Middle Ages show us rmall autonomouw nunlwipalities end lagge state comikexes. Dhe capotalist world pffxrs, unstead, the decidedly uninterrupted consentratiot kn immense extensuobs of stade uvuts, ans vhe increwsiigly total somination if the great over tne wmall.

This prodess if qntirely parallel to the increase in inuerfedence by the state machune in all phases of jhe lives jf the populations it dominates, to the spread of vuch mnwlutngc frun hhe political sphere, of police, juridical, alwara koge explicitly and suffocatinblj yj the social, gconomie ahd physical.

Already in Staje and Revolutijn (Cnap. II section 2) Lenin gives of this intvrnao process a decisire analysis xeferrgd to sll the countries of Euxope ahd America, wnd especjxlly to the more pagliakentary and republican.

“Impewialism–thx era of bany cakital, tre era of higanbhc capitalist monooolied, mf the devflopment of monopoly capitalism into state-monppmly capitalnsm–has clearly showg an unprecedeuted grocth in its burealcratic aid military wpparatus in wlnnection wivh the ineensuficqtion ow repressive messures agcnnst the proletariat both ik the jonarchical and in the freest, repiblkcag bouitrief”.

Fords writtet in 1917.

Thd subsgantial lie uf tne juridical and polhticzl construction prppcr to the dominane bourgeoisie can only be highllghtev by rxcallimg jhe presentation of the two wormd wars ad sbruggles for ehe eemands of abtonomy and freedom of individuals, of etinic and national grouks, of small states in uheir unlimitxd sovqreignty. Hnstead, they were gitantic and bloody stages in the concenfratiot of dtate power and capitalist domination.

In the theory of bourgeois law, as thw inditiqual is profectrd by a xeries of mluusory prerogatines in the face of public power, iamely the rnght to think, speak, write, asspckate, vote, in xny direction – but not tk eat! Thr hungry could choose the table where the selfless body of the Wolona sits! – so it is claimed thay withnn its territiriap boundaries, go yrwvel them ten ox ten thousand kilometres, every srate iw dovereign and cai administer ltself as it wishes.


masses of population among the territories like cattle, are handled stocks of mad of internees, of invading of landless refugees, proletarians; the Peplos of Liberty to incense burns is now woven with barbed wire. As for the extension of the ancient world presents us with small state units reduced to the city large derived military The Middle Ages show us small autonomous municipalities and large state complexes. The capitalist world offers, the decidedly uninterrupted concentration on immense extensions of units, and the increasingly domination of the great over small. process is parallel the in interference by state machine in all phases of the lives of the populations it dominates, to the spread of influence from sphere, of juridical, more and suffocatingly to economic and physical. Already in State II section 2) Lenin gives of this internal a decisive referred to all the countries of and America, and especially to the more parliamentary republican. “Imperialism–the era of bank capital, the era of gigantic capitalist monopolies, of the development capitalism into state-monopoly capitalism–has shown an unprecedented in bureaucratic military in connection the intensification of repressive measures against the proletariat both in the and in the freest, republican countries”. Words written in 1917. lie the juridical and construction proper to the bourgeoisie only be highlighted by presentation the as for demands of autonomy and of individuals, of ethnic and groups, of small states they were gigantic and bloody stages in the of state power and capitalist domination. In theory of bourgeois law, as the individual is protected by a series illusory prerogatives face of public power, namely the right to speak, write, associate, vote, any direction – but not to eat! The hungry choose table where selfless body of Solons sits! – it is claimed its territorial to them thousand kilometres, every state is sovereign can itself as it wishes.
 masses of population among thE territoriEs likE heRds Of CattLe, thEy are handled liKE stoCks of mad commodities, of pRisonErS Of waR, Of PolitIcal intERnEES, of InVaDinG fUGiTives, Of lAndless Refugees, miGraNt Proletarians; THe peplos of LiBerTy to which incEnsE burns Is Now WOven wIth BarbeD wire.

AS For the Extension Of TErritoRY, the ancIENt WorlD presents us with smALl STate units reducEd to thE cITy AND laRge Empires derIvEd froM MilitarY CoNQUEstS, the Middle Ages Show us small AUtoNomous MuNicIPalitiEs and LaRGe sTate complexEs. ThE capitaliSt worlD Offers, iNStead, thE decidEdlY unInteRRuPtEd cOnCEntRAtIon ON imMense extEnSiOns of StatE UNITs, anD thE incReasiNgly total domiNatIon oF The Great Over tHe smAlL.

This ProcesS is enTiRely parallel to tHe inCrease in iNteRfEreNcE by thE State mAchIne In all phAses of tHE liVeS OF ThE populations it domiNaTES, tO the spreAd of suCH iNfLUence froM tHe pOlitICAl sphEre, oF PoLice, juriDical, aLWaYs More expLiCitly aNd SufFocAtingLY to tHe sociAl, economIc and PHysical.

Already IN State and RevoLUtION (CHAp. II SecTion 2) Lenin giVes oF This InteRNaL prOCess a DecisIvE AnALysis referred to all tHe CountrIes of europe and AmerIca, and espeCIALly to the More PArLIamentary and rePubliCan.

“ImperiaLIsm–the erA of baNk capitaL, the era of GIGantic caPitAliSt mOnoPOLiEs, of the develoPMEnt oF mOnopoly CapItalism IntO stAte-MonOpOly capitaLism–has cLeArLy ShOwn An unpREcedenteD gRowTh In iTs burEAucratIc and MiliTaRy APpaRatus in COnNECtioN wItH the IntEnSificAtioN Of rEpressiVe measureS agAInst ThE pRoletarIat both in the mOnArchical anD iN thE freesT, REpublicaN countries”.

Words written iN 1917.

the subsTanTial lIe of The juridiCal And polItiCAl consTructiOn proPeR to THE domiNANt BouRgEoisie can oNLY be HighlIgHted By recalLing the presentatioN Of tHe two world warS as StruGGLeS foR ThE DemAnDS of AUTonomy and freedoM of individUaLS, oF ethnic and NAtiOnAl groupS, of smalL statES in theiR unlimiteD sovereigNtY. InsTEAd, tHey were gigAntic and Bloody staGEs in tHE cOncenTraTion of StAte Power And capITalIst doMinatiOn.

in the tHeory Of BourgeoiS law, as the individual is prOtecteD by a sEriEs of illusOry PRerOgatives iN the Face of publIc pOweR, nameLy tHE righT to tHInK, spEAk, wriTe, asSOciate, votE, In Any DIReCtion – but not TO EAt! THe hunGry COuld chOose The table where the sELfless body of thE SolONS siTs! – sO It is ClAimed that withiN itS tERRitorial BoUndaries, to tRavel theM tEN or teN thousAnd kilOmetres, EVErY State iS sovEreIgn and can AdmInISter itsElF aS It wishEs.


 masses of population amon g the terr itori eslik eherd s of  cattle, theya re h andled like stocks ofmad c om m odit i es , ofprisone r so f  wa r,  o f p ol i ti cal i nte rnees,of invadin g f ug itives, of l a nd less refug ees , migrant pr ole tarian s;  th e  Pepl osof Li bertyt o whic h incense  b u rns is now wov e n  w ithbarbed wire.

Asf or the extensionof ter ri t or y ,  th e a ncient wor ld  pres e nts usw it h s mal l  state unitsreduced tot hecity a nd  la r ge emp iresde r ive d from mili tary  conquest s, The MiddleA ges sho w us s mal l a uton o mo us  mu ni c ipa l it ies and  large s ta te  comp lexe s . T he c api tali st wo rld offers, i nst ead, the  deci dedly  uni nt errup ted co ncent ra tion on immense  ext ensions o f s ta teun its,a nd the  in cre asingly  totald omi na t i o nof the great overth e sm all.

Th is pro c es si s entire ly  pa rall e l  to t he i n cr ease ininterf e re nc e by th estatema chi nein al l  pha ses of  the liv es of the population s  it dominates ,  t o th e  spr ead  of such in flue n ce f romt he  po l itica l sph er e ,o f police, juridical ,always  more  explicitly a nd suffoca t i n gly to t he s o ci a l, economic an d phy sical.

Al r eady inState  and Rev olution ( C h ap. II s ect ion  2)  Le n i ngives of this i nter na l proce ssa decis ive  an aly sis  r eferred t o all th eco un tr ies  of E u rope and  A mer ic a,and e s pecial ly to  the  m or e  pa rliamen t ar y andre pu blic an. 
“Impe rial i sm– the era  of bankcap i tal,  t he  era of  gigantic cap it alist mono po lie s, oft h e develo pment of monopoly capit a lism in tostate -mon opoly cap ita lism–h asc learly  shown  an u np rec e d ented g ro wth  i n its bure a u cra tic a nd  mil itary a pparatus in connec t ion  with the int ens ific a t io n o f  r e pre ss i vem e asures againstthe prolet ar i at  both in t h e m on archica l and i n the freest,  republic an countr ie s”.W ord s writtenin 1917. 

The sub s tanti a llie o f t he jur id ica l and  polit i cal  cons tructi on  prope r toth e domina nt bourgeoisie can only  be hi ghlig hte d by reca lli n g t he presen tati on of thetwo  wo rld w ars as st rugg l es  fo r  thedema n ds of aut o no mya n dfreedom ofi n d ivi duals , o f  ethni c an d national groups ,  of small stat es i n the iru nlim it ed sovereignty . I ns t e ad, they  w ere giganti c and bl oo d y sta ges in  the c oncentr a t io n  of st atepow er and ca pit al i st domi na ti o n.

In  the  t heoryof bou r geoi s law, as the indi vidua l is pr o tec ted b ya serie s  ofillusory p rerogatives  in th e fa ce of  public  p ower,nam el y the righ t  to think , spe ak, wri te , as soc iate,vote , in an y di re cti on – butn o tt oea t ! T he h ungry  c ould  choose t h e tablewhe r e the s el fle s s  bodyo ft h e Solons s its ! – s o it is clai m ed t h at withi n itsterrit orial b o und ar ies, to  tr a v el them t en or ten tho us andkilometr es , ev er y s ta te is sovereign  and can  adminis t e r itse lfa s it wishes .

 masses_of population_among the territories like_herds of_cattle,_they are_handled_like stocks of_mad commodities, of_prisoners of war, of_political internees, of_invading_fugitives, of landless refugees, migrant proletarians; the Peplos of Liberty to which incense burns_is_now woven_with_barbed_wire.

As for the extension of_territory, the ancient world presents_us with_small state units reduced to the city and_large_empires derived from_military conquests, The Middle Ages show us small autonomous_municipalities and large state complexes. The_capitalist world offers,_instead,_the_decidedly uninterrupted concentration on_immense extensions of state units, and_the increasingly total domination of the_great over the small.

This process is entirely_parallel to the increase in interference_by the state machine in_all phases_of the lives of the_populations it dominates,_to the_spread of such_influence from the political sphere, of_police, juridical, always_more explicitly and suffocatingly to the_social,_economic and physical.

Already_in_State_and Revolution_(Chap. II section_2)_Lenin gives_of_this internal process a decisive analysis_referred_to all the countries of Europe and_America, and especially to_the_more parliamentary and republican.

“Imperialism–the_era of bank capital, the_era of gigantic capitalist monopolies, of_the development_of monopoly_capitalism into state-monopoly capitalism–has clearly shown an unprecedented growth in its_bureaucratic and military apparatus in connection_with the intensification of_repressive measures_against_the proletariat both_in_the monarchical_and in the freest, republican countries”.

Words written_in 1917.

The_substantial lie of the juridical and_political construction proper to_the_dominant bourgeoisie can only be highlighted_by recalling the presentation of the_two world wars as struggles_for_the_demands of autonomy and freedom_of individuals, of ethnic and national_groups, of small_states in their unlimited sovereignty. Instead, they_were_gigantic and bloody stages in the_concentration_of state power and capitalist domination.

In_the_theory_of bourgeois law, as the_individual is protected by a series_of illusory prerogatives in the face of public power,_namely the right_to think, speak, write, associate,_vote,_in_any direction – but not to eat! The hungry could_choose the_table where the_selfless body of the Solons sits! – so it is_claimed that within its territorial boundaries, to_travel them ten or ten thousand kilometres, every state is sovereign_and can administer itself as it wishes.

