 like Panasonic, Axis and Vivotek.

Panasonic said it recognizes there is a problem with cameras having default credentials. To remedy this, the company now forces users to create secure passwords during installation.

For its part, OOSSXX didn't respond to questions about why it doesn't require mandatory passwords.

That's not good enough for the homeowners located by Marketplace; both pulled the plug on their cameras.

"Obviously, I just want to take it off the internet right away," one said. As we continually search for ways to improve gender inclusivity in Spanish, we have come up with a myriad of broad language such as Latino/a and Latin@. The most recent of these solutions is the term “Latinx.” In our opinion, the use of the identifier “Latinx” as the new standard should be discouraged because it is a buzzword that fails to address any of the problems within Spanish on a meaningful scale. This position is controversial to some members of the Latino community here at Swarthmore and beyond, but the other positions within the community also deserve to be heard. We are Latinos, proud of our heritage, that were raised speaking Spanish. We are not arguing against gender-inclusive language. We have no prejudice towards non-binary people. We see, however, a misguided desire to forcibly change the language we and millions of people around the world speak, to the detriment of all. Under the “degenderization” of Spanish advocated by proponents of words such as “Latinx” words such as latinos, hermanos, and niños would be converted into latinxs, hermanxs, and niñxs respectively. This is a blatant form of linguistic imperialism — the forcing of U.S. ideals upon a language in a way that does not grammatically or orally correspond with it.

The term “Latinx” is used almost exclusively within the United States. According to Google trend data, “Latinx” came into popular use in October of 2014 and has since been widely popularized by American blogs and American institutions of higher education. The term is virtually nonexistent in any Spanish-speaking country. This is problematic for many reasons. It serves as a prime example of how English speakers can’t seem to stop imposing their social norms on other cultures. It seems that U.S. English speakers came upon Spanish, deemed it too backwards compared to their own progressive leanings, and rather than working within
like Panasonic, Axis and Vivotek. 

 Panasonic said it recognizes there is a problem with camera have default credentials. To remedy this, the party now forces user to create secure password during facility. 

 For its part, OOSSXX didn't answer to questions about why it doesn't require compulsory passwords. 

 That's not good enough for the homeowners located by Marketplace; both pulled the plug on their cameras. 

 " Obviously, I merely want to take it off the internet right aside, " one said. As we continually search for ways to better gender inclusivity in Spanish, we have come up with a myriad of broad language such as Latino / a and Latin@. The about recent of these solutions is the term “ Latinx. ” In our opinion, the use of the identifier “ Latinx ” as the new criterion should be deter because it is a buzzword that fails to address any of the problems within Spanish on a meaningful scale. This position is controversial to some members of the Latino community here at Swarthmore and beyond, but the other position within the community also deserve to be hear. We are Latinos, gallant of our heritage, that were raised speaking Spanish. We are not arguing against gender - inclusive language. We have no prejudice towards non - binary citizenry. We see, however, a misguided desire to forcibly change the language we and millions of people around the earth speak, to the detriment of all. Under the “ degenderization ” of Spanish advocated by proponents of words such as “ Latinx ” word such as latin american, hermanos, and niños would be converted into latinxs, hermanxs, and niñxs respectively. This is a blatant form of linguistic imperialism — the forcing of U.S. ideals upon a language in a way that does not grammatically or orally represent with it. 

 The term “ Latinx ” is used almost entirely within the United States. According to Google course data, “ Latinx ” came into democratic use in October of 2014 and has since been widely popularized by American blogs and American institutions of high education. The condition is virtually nonexistent in any Spanish - speak country. This is baffling for many reasons. It serves as a prime example of how English speakers ca n’t appear to stop imposing their social norms on other cultures. It seems that U.S. English speakers came upon Spanish, deemed it excessively backwards compared to their own progressive leaning, and rather than working within
 line Panasonic, Axis and Viyotek.

Panasonic scud it cecogniaes therd is a problem with cameras iavibg dedault credentials. To rdmedy thid, the conpanb now forces useca to crccte ssgure 'awswords during installathon.

For its pard, UODSXX didn't respond to questions abott why ot doesn't requirg mancwtorg passwords.

That's not good enough fkr the iomeowners locayed by Marketplace; both pupled the plug on their cameras.

"Obvuousjt, I just wang to take pc off the ihternet right away," one said. As de coutinually sgcech xor ways to imprjve gender ikblusividy in Slanish, we have coke yp with a myriad of bcoad language such af Latino/a aud Latin@. The most recwnr of jhese soljriovs js tge terl “Letinx.” In oud opinion, tye use of the identofyvt “Latinx” as fhe ner ftandard should be discouraged because pt ia a buzzword that fails to address any of thg problems within Spanish on a meaningful scale. This positimn is zonuriverskql to some members of the Latino community here zt Searthmore and neyond, but the othrr ppfitions withiv the ekmjunity also deservf to be heare. We are Jatimos, proud of our heritage, tyat were raifwd speaking Spanisk. We are not argoing abainst gender-inclusive uanghage. We havf no prejhaice towards non-cinsrf people. We see, however, a iisguided desnre to furcinly chwnge the lwnguana we and millions lf pelpne around hhe world speak, to the detrimenv of all. Undet tve “gegendernzatiok” of Spanish addocated by prokonents oy wordr such as “Matinx” xords such af latinos, herkwnos, and niñov would fe cinveeted ingu latinxs, hermsnxs, and unñxs respextively. This is a nlatavf form of lingunruix imperialism — thd fjrbinj of T.V. ideals upot a uaneiage kn a way thct doex not grammatically mr odally correspond wotm it.

The tgrm “Latinv” is used almpst exclusively wiuhin tie Unived Ststef. According to Google trend dafa, “Latinx” caie into popujar mse yn October of 2014 and has since been widely popularived by American blogs abd American institujioks of higher educwtion. The term is virtually ninexistent in any Spanish-speaking counfry. Thhs is problematic for many reasons. It serves as a prime example of how English speakxrf can’t seem to xtop pmpjxing treir rocial norms on pther cultures. It seems that U.S. English s'eakers came upon Spanish, deekea it too backdards compared to their kwn progtessive leanings, and rather tham working within
like Panasonic, Axis and Vivotek. Panasonic said there a problem cameras having default company forces users to secure passwords during For its part, OOSSXX didn't respond questions about why it doesn't require mandatory passwords. That's not good enough for homeowners located by Marketplace; both pulled the plug on their cameras. "Obviously, I want take off internet right away," one said. As we continually search for ways to improve gender inclusivity in we have come up with a myriad of language such as Latino/a Latin@. The most recent of solutions the term In opinion, use of the “Latinx” as the new standard should be discouraged because it is a buzzword that fails to address of the Spanish on meaningful This is controversial to of the Latino community here at but the other positions within the community also to be We are Latinos, proud of our that were raised speaking Spanish. We are not against gender-inclusive language. We have no prejudice towards non-binary people. We see, however, a misguided forcibly change the language and millions of around world to detriment of Under the “degenderization” of Spanish advocated by proponents of words such “Latinx” words such as latinos, hermanos, and niños would be latinxs, and niñxs respectively. is a blatant form linguistic — the forcing of upon language that not or orally correspond with The term “Latinx” is used exclusively within the United data, “Latinx” came into popular use in October 2014 and has since been widely popularized American blogs and American institutions of higher education. The term is virtually in any This is problematic for many reasons. It serves a prime example of English speakers can’t seem to stop imposing their social on cultures. It that U.S. English came upon Spanish, it too backwards their own leanings, rather
 like Panasonic, Axis and VivotEk.

PanasoniC said It rEcoGnIzes TherE is a problem witH CameRas having default credenTials. to REmedY ThIs, the Company NOw FORceS uSeRs tO cREaTe secUre PassworDs during inStaLlAtion.

For its pARt, oOSSXX didn'T reSpond to questIonS about WhY it DOesn't ReqUire mAndatoRY passwOrds.

That's NoT Good enOUgh for tHE HoMeowNers located by MarkETpLAce; both pulled tHe plug On THeIR CamEraS.

"Obviously, i jUst waNT to take IT oFF THe iNTernet right awAy," one said. As WE coNtinuaLlY seARch for Ways tO iMProVe gender incLusiVity in SpaNish, we HAve come UP with a mYriad oF brOad LangUAgE sUch As lAtiNO/a And lAtiN@. The most ReCeNt of tHese SOLUTionS is The tErm “LaTinx.” In our opinIon, The uSE of The idEntifIer “LAtInx” as The new StandArD should be discouRageD because iT is A bUzzWoRd thaT Fails tO adDreSs any of The probLEms WiTHIN SPanish on a meaningfuL sCALe. this posiTion is COnTrOVersial tO sOme MembERS of thE LatINo CommunitY here aT swArThmore aNd Beyond, BuT thE otHer poSItioNs withIn the comMunitY Also deserve to bE Heard. We are LatINoS, PRoUD of oUr hEritage, that Were RAiseD speAKiNg SPAnish. we are NoT ArGUing against gender-inClUsive lAnguaGe. We have no preJudice towaRDS Non-binarY peoPLe. wE see, however, a miSguidEd desire to FOrcibly cHange The languAge we and mILLions of pEopLe aRouNd tHE WoRld speak, to the DETrimEnT of all. UNdeR the “degEndEriZatIon” Of spanish adVocated bY pRoPoNeNts Of worDS such as “LAtInx” WoRds Such aS LatinoS, hermAnos, AnD nIÑos Would be COnVERted InTo LatiNxs, HeRmanxS, and NIñxS respecTively. ThiS is A BlatAnT fOrm of liNguistic imperIaLism — the forCiNg oF U.S. ideALS upon a laNguage in a way that does not GRammatiCalLy or oRallY correspoNd wIth it.

THe tERm “LatiNx” is usEd almOsT exCLUsiveLY WiThiN tHe United StATEs. ACcordInG to GOogle trEnd data, “Latinx” came iNTo pOpular use in OcTobEr of 2014 AND hAs sINcE BeeN wIDelY POpularized by AmeRican blogs AnD amErican instITutIoNs of higHer educAtion. tHe term iS virtuallY nonexistEnT in aNY spaNish-speakiNg countrY. This is prOBlemaTIc For maNy rEasons. it SerVes as A prime EXamPle of How EngLiSh speaKers cAn’T seem to sTop imposing their social nOrms on Other CulTures. It seEms THat u.S. English SpeaKers came upOn SPanIsh, deEmeD It too BackWArDs cOMpareD to tHEir own proGReSsiVE LeAnings, and raTHER thAn worKinG Within
 like Panasonic, Axis andVivotek.
Panas oni c s ai d it  rec ognizes therei s aproblem with cameras h aving  d e faul t  c reden tials.T or e med yth is,  t h ecompa nynow for ces userstocr eate securep as swords dur ing  installatio n.
For i ts  pa r t, OO SSX X did n't re s pond t o questio ns aboutw hy it d o e sn 't r equire mandatoryp as s words.

That's  not g oo d  e n o ugh  fo r the home ow nersl ocatedb yM a r ket p lace; both pu lled the pl u g o n thei rcam e ras.
"Obvi ou s ly,  I just wan t to  take itoff th e  intern e t right  away, " o nesaid .  A sweco n tin u al lys ear ch for w ay sto im prov e g e nder  in clus ivity  in Spanish,wehave com e upwitha my ri ad of  broad  lang ua ge such as Lati no/a  and Lati n@.  T hemo st re c ent of  th ese  soluti ons ist hete r m “L atinx.” In our opi ni o n ,the useof the id en t ifier “L at inx ” as t he ne w st a nd ard shou ld bed is co uragedbe causeit  is  abuzzw o rd t hat fa ils to a ddres s  any of the pr o blems withinS pa n i sh on a  me aningful sc ale. This  pos i ti oni s con trove rs i al to some members ofth e Lati no co mmunity hereat Swarthm o r e  and bey ond, bu t  the other pos ition s within t h e commun ity a lso dese rve to be h eard. We  ar e L ati nos , pr oud of our he r i tage ,that we reraisedspe aki ngSpa ni sh. We ar e not ar gu in gag ain st ge n der-incl us ive  l ang uage. We hav e noprej ud ic e  to wards n o n- b i nary  p eo ple.  We  s ee, h owev e r,a misgu ided desi ret o fo rc ib ly chan ge the langua ge  we and mi ll ion s of p e o ple arou nd the world speak, tot he detr ime nt of  all . Under t he“degen der i zation ” of S panis hadv o c atedb y  p rop on ents of wo r d s s uch a s“Lat inx” wo rds such as latino s , h ermanos, andniñ os w o u ld  be co n ver te d  in t o  latinxs, herma nxs, and n iñ x srespective l y.Th is is a  blatan t for m  of lin guistic i mperialis m— th e for cing of U. S. ideal s upon al angua g ein away  thatdo esnot g rammat i cal ly or  orall ycorres pondwi th it.
The term “Latinx” is us ed alm ost e xcl usively w ith i n t he United  Sta tes. Accor din g t o Goo gle trend  dat a ,“La t inx”came into popu l ar  us e in  October of 2 0 14and h ass ince b eenwidely popularize d  by American b logs a ndAme r ican  i nstitutions of  hi gh e r  educati on . The termis virtu al l y non existe nt inany Spa n i sh - speaki ng c oun try. This  is  p r oblemat ic  f o r many  rea so ns. It  serve s  asa prime example of  howE n glish spe akers  c an’t se e m to  stop impo sing theirsocial  nor ms on  othercu ltures . I tseems that U.S. Engl ish s peakers  c ameupo n Span ish, d eemed  itto o b ackwardsc o mp a re dt o t heir  ownpr ogre ssive lea n ings, an d r a ther th an  wo r k ing wi t hi n 
 like_Panasonic, Axis_and Vivotek.

Panasonic said it_recognizes there_is_a problem_with_cameras having default_credentials. To remedy_this, the company now_forces users to_create_secure passwords during installation.

For its part, OOSSXX didn't respond to questions about why it_doesn't_require mandatory_passwords.

That's_not_good enough for the homeowners_located by Marketplace; both pulled_the plug_on their cameras.

"Obviously, I just want to take_it_off the internet_right away," one said. As we continually search for_ways to improve gender inclusivity in_Spanish, we have_come_up_with a myriad of_broad language such as Latino/a and_Latin@. The most recent of these_solutions is the term “Latinx.” In our_opinion, the use of the identifier_“Latinx” as the new standard_should be_discouraged because it is a_buzzword that fails_to address_any of the_problems within Spanish on a meaningful_scale. This position_is controversial to some members of_the_Latino community here_at_Swarthmore_and beyond,_but the other_positions_within the_community_also deserve to be heard. We_are_Latinos, proud of our heritage, that were_raised speaking Spanish. We_are_not arguing against gender-inclusive_language. We have no prejudice_towards non-binary people. We see, however,_a misguided_desire to_forcibly change the language we and millions of people around the_world speak, to the detriment of_all. Under the “degenderization”_of Spanish_advocated_by proponents of_words_such as_“Latinx” words such as latinos, hermanos, and_niños would_be converted into latinxs, hermanxs, and_niñxs respectively. This is_a_blatant form of linguistic imperialism —_the forcing of U.S. ideals upon_a language in a way_that_does_not grammatically or orally correspond_with it.

The term “Latinx” is used_almost exclusively within_the United States. According to Google trend_data,_“Latinx” came into popular use in_October_of 2014 and has since been_widely_popularized_by American blogs and American_institutions of higher education. The term_is virtually nonexistent in any Spanish-speaking country. This is_problematic for many_reasons. It serves as a_prime_example_of how English speakers can’t seem to stop imposing their_social norms_on other cultures._It seems that U.S. English speakers came upon Spanish, deemed_it too backwards compared to their own_progressive leanings, and rather than working within