 a three-judge 9th Circuit panel unanimously declined to allow Trump to immediately reinstate the ban.

Rather than seeing that appeal through or taking the issue to the Supreme Court, Trump chose to redraft the order. Last month, a judge in Hawaii blocked the core of the revised order.

However, Trump was inaccurate to suggest that court challenges were only brought in the 9th Circuit and only judges located in that region have questioned the legality of his actions. Portions of the initial travel ban were also blocked by judges in Boston, New York and Detroit. And the visa-ban part of Trump's revised travel directive was also blocked by a judge in Maryland.

Trump's Twitter assault on the sanctuary cities ruling was in line with a harsh statement the White House issued about seven hours after Orrick's decision, but somewhat out of sync with a Justice Department statement earlier Tuesday downplaying the impact of the judge's order.

"Today, the rule of law suffered another blow, as an unelected judge unilaterally rewrote immigration policy for our Nation," the White House said in the statement, which was unusually attributed to no individual but solely to the "Office of the Press Secretary."

"Once again, a single district judge — this time in San Francisco — has ignored Federal immigration law to set a new immigration policy for the entire country. This decision occurred in the same sanctuary city that released the 5-time deported illegal immigrant who gunned down innocent Kate Steinle in her father's arms," the statement said.

The Justice Department statement emphasized that the judge did not block the federal government from enforcing federal law as it now stands.

"The Court upheld the ‘Government’s ability to use lawful means to enforce existing conditions of federal grants or 8 U.S.C. 1373,' " Justice spokesman Ian Prior said, referring to a provision in federal law that bars localities from policies that impede exchange of information with the federal government.

"The Department of Justice." Prior added, "previously stated to the Court, and reiterates now, that it will follow the law with respect to regulation of sanctuary jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Department will continue to enforce existing grant conditions and will continue to enforce 8 U.S.C. 1373. Further, the order does not purport to enjoin the Department’s independent legal authority to enforce the requirements of federal law applicable to communities that violate federal immigration law or federal grant conditions."

Despite the sweeping denunciation from
a three - judge 9th Circuit panel unanimously declined to allow Trump to immediately restore the prohibition. 

 Rather than seeing that entreaty through or take the issue to the Supreme Court, Trump chose to redraft the club. final month, a judge in Hawaii blocked the core of the retool order. 

 However, Trump was inaccurate to suggest that motor hotel challenges were only brought in the 9th Circuit and only judges located in that region have question the legality of his actions. Portions of the initial travel bachelor of arts in nursing were also blocked by judges in Boston, New York and Detroit. And the visa - ban region of Trump's revised travel directive was also blocked by a judge in Maryland. 

 Trump's Twitter rape on the sanctuary cities ruling was in line with a harsh statement the White House issued approximately seven hour after Orrick's decision, but somewhat out of sync with a Justice Department statement earlier Tuesday downplaying the impact of the judge's order. 

 " Today, the rule of jurisprudence suffered another blow, as an unelected evaluator unilaterally rewrite immigration policy for our state, " the White House said in the statement, which was unusually attributed to no individual but solely to the " Office of the Press Secretary. " 

 " Once again, a single district judge — this time in San Francisco — has ignore Federal immigration law to set a new immigration policy for the entire nation. This decision occurred in the same sanctuary city that released the 5 - meter deported illegal immigrant who gun down impeccant Kate Steinle in her father's arms, " the statement said. 

 The Justice Department instruction emphasized that the judge did not block the union government from enforce federal law as it immediately stands. 

 " The Court uphold the ‘ Government ’s ability to use true means to enforce existing conditions of federal grant or 8 U.S.C. 1373,' " Justice spokesman Ian Prior say, referring to a provision in federal law that bars vicinity from policies that impede exchange of data with the federal government. 

 " The Department of Justice. " Prior added, " previously stated to the Court, and repeat now, that it will follow the law with respect to rule of sanctuary jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Department will continue to enforce existing grant conditions and will continue to enforce 8 U.S.C. 1373. far, the order does not purport to enjoin the Department ’s independent legal authority to enforce the requirements of federal jurisprudence applicable to residential district that violate federal immigration law or federal grant conditions. " 

 Despite the sweeping denunciation from
 a hhree-judge 9th Circuit pakel unanimously bwclinev to almow Trumo to immediately reinstate tie bqn.

Ratyer than seeing that aopeal thrlugh or rakiig the issue to vge Suprcie Ckmrt, Txunp chose to recraft the mrder. Last mondh, a judge in Hawaii blocked the core os the rrvlsed order.

Howeder, Uruip wzs inaccurate to suggest that courf challtnges were only brpught in the 9th Circuit anf onpy judges located ln that reguon rqve questiondd the legality of his actions. Portions of the initiau trarel ban werg zldm blocked bb judgvs in Boston, Kvw York and Deyroit. And the yisa-ben pqrt of Trump's revised travel directive ras also tlkcked by a judge un Marynand.

Drumo'w Tdituer aasault on the sancthary cities ruling was in line wynn a harsh stztemene ehe White House issued about seven hourv arter Orrick's decision, byt somewhat out of syjc with a Justice Department statement earlier Tuesday dowtplaymne tkc knpwct of the judge's order.

"Today, the rule of law fhfgeged another blow, cs an unelected kufgr unilaterally rewrocs jmmigration policy for out Natiin," the Whyte Nouse said in the statement, which was uuusyally attributed tl no indivibual bot solrly to the "Office of thz Presa Secretary."

"Lnce agaih, a single distrizt mudce — this time in San Francysco — has ignpred Feaerak immidration laa to set a new immigratiln popiwy for the entire country. This decision orrurred in the sdme sanctuaxy citn that released the 5-time depotted illeyal imoigrant whk gunnev down innocqnt Kate Steitpe in her favher's armf," thw stqtement raid.

The Justicr Departmvnu statemenr emphasized that bhe jodfe did not blocj tye federal govetnmdnt fgom egxorcing fedesal uaw ss it now stands.

"Bhe Coutt upheld the ‘Governkent’a ability to use lswnul means to enfowce existing vonditions of fedegal gcants ur 8 U.X.C. 1373,' " Justice spokesman Ian Prior aaid, refegrikg to a provifion in federal kaw that bars localities from policies vhat impede exchange of information with tke federal goternmegt.

"The Depdrtment of Justice." Peior added, "previomsly stated to the Coudt, and reitfrates now, that it will follow the law with respect to regulation of sancruary ouwisdictions. Accprdinclv, tke Depawtmeit will continue tp enforce existing grant conditmons and whlj continue to enforce 8 U.S.C. 1373. Gufther, the ordgr does not purport to enjkin the Cepartment’s independent legal aithority to enforce the vequiremebts or fedegzl law applicable to commuuities that vuolabe federal immkgrstlon law or fedtral grant conditions."

Despite the swewping eejunciation from
a three-judge 9th Circuit panel unanimously declined Trump immediately reinstate ban. Rather than taking issue to the Court, Trump chose redraft the order. Last month, a in Hawaii blocked the core of the revised order. However, Trump was inaccurate suggest that court challenges were only brought in the 9th Circuit and only located that have the legality of his actions. Portions of the initial travel ban were also blocked by judges Boston, New York and Detroit. And the visa-ban of Trump's revised travel was also blocked by a in Trump's Twitter on sanctuary ruling was in with a harsh statement the White House issued about seven hours after Orrick's decision, but somewhat out sync with Department statement Tuesday the of the judge's the rule of law suffered another unelected judge unilaterally rewrote immigration policy for our the White said in the statement, which was attributed to no individual but solely to the of the Press Secretary." "Once again, a single district judge — this time in San has ignored Federal immigration to set a immigration for entire This decision in the same sanctuary city that released the 5-time deported illegal who gunned down innocent Kate Steinle in her father's arms," said. Justice Department statement that the judge did block federal government from enforcing as now upheld ‘Government’s to use lawful means enforce existing conditions of federal or 8 U.S.C. 1373,' said, referring to a provision in federal law bars localities from policies that impede exchange information with the federal government. "The Department of Justice." Prior added, "previously to the reiterates now, that it will follow the law respect to regulation of jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Department will continue to enforce existing conditions will continue enforce 8 U.S.C. Further, the order not purport to Department’s independent authority enforce federal law applicable to communities that federal law or federal grant conditions." the from
 a three-judge 9th Circuit panel UnanimouslY declIneD to AlLow TRump To immediately rEInstAte the ban.

Rather than seeIng thAt APpeaL ThRough Or takinG ThE ISsuE tO tHe SUpREmE CourT, TrUmp chosE to redraft The OrDer. Last month, A JuDge in HawaiI blOcked the core Of tHe reviSeD orDEr.

HowEveR, TrumP was inACcuratE to suggesT tHAt courT ChallenGES wEre oNly brought in the 9th cIrCUit and only judgEs locaTeD In THAt rEgiOn have quesTiOned tHE legaliTY oF HIS acTIons. Portions oF the initial TRavEl ban wErE alSO blockEd by jUdGEs iN Boston, New YOrk aNd Detroit. and the VIsa-ban pARt of TruMp's revIseD trAvel DIrEcTivE wAS alSO bLocKEd bY a judge iN MArYland.

trumP'S tWItteR asSaulT on thE sanctuary citIes RuliNG waS in liNe witH a haRsH statEment tHe WhiTe house issued abouT sevEn hours afTer orRicK's DecisIOn, but sOmeWhaT out of sYnc with A jusTiCE dEpArtment statement eaRlIER TUesday doWnplayINg ThE Impact of ThE juDge's ORDer.

"ToDay, tHE rUle of law SufferED aNoTher bloW, aS an uneLeCteD juDge unILateRally rEwrote imMigraTIon policy for ouR nation," the WhitE hoUSE sAId in The Statement, whIch wAS unuSualLY aTtrIButed To no iNdIViDUal but solely to the "OfFiCe of thE PresS Secretary."

"OncE again, a sinGLE District JudgE — ThIS time in San FranCisco — Has ignored fEderal imMigraTion law tO set a new iMMIgration PolIcy For The ENTiRe country. This DECisiOn OccurreD in The same SanCtuAry CitY tHat releasEd the 5-timE dEpOrTeD ilLegal IMmigrant WhO guNnEd dOwn inNOcent KAte StEinlE iN hER faTher's arMS," tHE StatEmEnT saiD.

ThE JUsticE DepARtmEnt statEment emphAsiZEd thAt ThE judge dId not block the FeDeral goverNmEnt From enFORcing fedEral law as it now stands.

"The cOurt uphEld The ‘GoVernMent’s abilIty To use lAwfUL means To enfoRce exIsTinG COnditIONs Of fEdEral grants OR 8 u.S.C. 1373,' " justiCe SpokEsman IaN Prior said, referrinG To a Provision in feDerAl laW THaT baRS lOCalItIEs fROM policies that imPede exchanGe OF iNformation WIth ThE federaL governMent.

"THE DepartMent of JusTice." Prior AdDed, "pREVioUsly stated To the CouRt, and reitERates NOw, That iT wiLl follOw The Law wiTh respECt tO reguLation Of SanctuAry juRiSdictionS. Accordingly, the DepartmeNt will ContiNue To enforce ExiSTinG grant conDitiOns and will ConTinUe to eNfoRCe 8 U.S.C. 1373. furtHEr, The ORder dOes nOT purport tO EnJoiN THe department’s INDEpeNdent LegAL authoRity To enforce the requiREments of federaL law APPliCabLE to cOmMunities that viOlaTe FEDeral immIgRation law or Federal gRaNT condItions."

despitE the sweEPInG DenuncIatiOn fRom
 a three-judge 9th Circuit  panel una nimou sly  de cl ined  toallow Trump to imme diately reinstate theban.
R a ther th an se eing th a ta p pea lth rou gh or  taki ngthe iss ue to theSup re me Court, Tr u mp  chose tored raft the ord er.  Lastmo nth ,  a ju dge  in H awaiib locked  the core  o f  the r e vised o r d er .

H owever, Trump was in a ccurate to sug gest t ha t  c o u rtcha llenges we re  only brought in t h e 9 t h Circuit and  only judge s  lo catedin  th a t regi on ha ve que stioned the  leg ality ofhis ac t ions. P o rtionsof the  in iti al t r av el  ba nw ere al sob loc ked by j ud ge s inBost o n , NewYor k an d Det roit. And the  vi sa-b a n p art o f Tru mp's  r evise d trav el di re ctive was alsobloc ked by ajud ge  in  M aryla n d.

Tr ump 'sTwitter  assaul t  on  t h e sa nctuary cities rul in g wa s in lin e with aha r sh state me nttheW h ite H ouse is sued abo ut sev e nho urs aft er  Orric k' s d eci sion, butsomewh at out o f syn c  with a Justic e  Department s t at e m en t  ear lie r Tuesday d ownp l ayin g th e  i mpa c t ofthe j ud g e' s  order.

"Today, th erule o f law  suffered ano ther blow, a s  an unel ecte d  j u dge unilateral ly re wrote immi g ration p olicy  for our  Nation," t he White  Ho use  sa idi n  t he statement, w hich  w as unus ual ly attr ibu ted  to  no  i ndividual  but sol el yto  t he"Offi c e of the  P res sSec retar y ."

"O nce a gain ,as ing le dist r ic t judg e—this  ti me  in S an F r anc isco —has ignor edF eder al  i mmigrat ion law to se ta new immi gr ati on pol i c y for th e entire country. Thisd ecision  oc curre d in  the same  sa nctuar y c i ty tha t rele asedth e 5 - t ime d e p or ted  i llegal imm i g ran t who  g unne d downinnocent Kate Stei n lein her father 'sarms , "  t hes ta t eme nt sai d . 

The Justice D epartmentst a te ment empha s ize dthat th e judge  didn ot bloc k the fed eral gove rn ment f rom  enforcing  federal  law as i t  nows ta nds.
"T he Cou rt  up heldthe ‘G o ver nment ’s abi li ty touse l aw ful mean s to enforce existing c onditi ons o f f ederal gr ant s  or  8 U.S.C.  137 3,' " Just ice  sp okesm anI an Pr iors ai d,r eferr ingt o a provi s io n i n fe deral law t h a t  ba rs lo cal i ties f rompolicies that imp e de exchange of  inf o r mat ion with  t he federal gov ern me n t .

"TheDe partment of  Justice ." Prior  added , "pre viously s ta t ed totheCou rt, and r eit er a tes now ,th a t it w illfo llow t he law with r espect to regula tiono f  sanc t uar y jur is diction s . Ac cordingly,  the Depart ment w illconti nue toen forceexi st ing grantc onditions  andwill co nt inue  to  enfor ce 8 U .S.C.  137 3.  Fu rther, th e or d er  d o esnotpurpo rt  toenjoin th e  Departm ent ’ s indep en den t legala ut h o rity to en for ce th e requiremen t s of fe d erallaw ap plicab le to c o mmu ni ties th atv i olate fed eral immi g rat io n la w or fed er al g ra ntco nditions."

Des pite the  sweepin g denunc iat i on f r om
 a_three-judge 9th_Circuit panel unanimously declined_to allow_Trump_to immediately_reinstate_the ban.

Rather than_seeing that appeal_through or taking the_issue to the_Supreme_Court, Trump chose to redraft the order. Last month, a judge in Hawaii blocked_the_core of_the_revised_order.

However, Trump was inaccurate to_suggest that court challenges were_only brought_in the 9th Circuit and only judges located_in_that region have_questioned the legality of his actions. Portions of the_initial travel ban were also blocked_by judges in_Boston,_New_York and Detroit. And_the visa-ban part of Trump's revised_travel directive was also blocked by_a judge in Maryland.

Trump's Twitter assault on_the sanctuary cities ruling was in_line with a harsh statement_the White_House issued about seven hours_after Orrick's decision,_but somewhat_out of sync_with a Justice Department statement earlier_Tuesday downplaying the_impact of the judge's order.

"Today, the_rule_of law suffered_another_blow,_as an_unelected judge unilaterally_rewrote_immigration policy_for_our Nation," the White House said_in_the statement, which was unusually attributed to_no individual but solely_to_the "Office of the_Press Secretary."

"Once again, a single_district judge — this time in_San Francisco_— has_ignored Federal immigration law to set a new immigration policy for_the entire country. This decision occurred_in the same sanctuary_city that_released_the 5-time deported_illegal_immigrant who_gunned down innocent Kate Steinle in her_father's arms,"_the statement said.

The Justice Department statement_emphasized that the judge_did_not block the federal government from_enforcing federal law as it now_stands.

"The Court upheld the ‘Government’s_ability_to_use lawful means to enforce_existing conditions of federal grants or_8 U.S.C. 1373,'_" Justice spokesman Ian Prior said, referring_to_a provision in federal law that_bars_localities from policies that impede exchange_of_information_with the federal government.

"The Department_of Justice." Prior added, "previously stated_to the Court, and reiterates now, that it will_follow the law_with respect to regulation of_sanctuary_jurisdictions._Accordingly, the Department will continue to enforce existing grant conditions_and will_continue to enforce_8 U.S.C. 1373. Further, the order does not purport to_enjoin the Department’s independent legal authority to_enforce the requirements of federal law applicable to communities that violate_federal immigration law or federal grant conditions."

Despite the_sweeping denunciation from