 to promote the claims of the success of the Montreal Protocol. But while important, that is a minor part of the complete fiasco that summarizes as follows.

1. No empirical evidence exists to show that CFCs were creating “holes in the ozone.”

2. Ozone levels and their variability were and are natural.

3. False science was created to prove CFCs were a problem.

4. A political structure was set up that used the false science to impose completely unnecessary restrictions on a wide range of manufacturing, business, and everyday activities.

5. Dupont produced CFCs originally as an inert, safe, replacement mostly for ammonia in refrigeration equipment.

6. Dupont did not oppose the ban on CFCs because they already had a replacement, HCFCs, and later HFCs, to advance crony capitalism.

7. Politicians pushed by the environmental lobbies produced the Montreal Protocol, that is similar to my description years ago of Kyoto as an unnecessary political solution to a non-existent scientific problem.

8. Most countries were part of the Montreal Protocol but were not required to take any action.

9. A similar deception was created around CO2 with attempts to produce a political solution, the Kyoto Protocol. Again most countries were not required to take action.

10. The Kyoto Protocol collapsed when the false science was exposed through leaked emails.

11. A replacement, the Green Climate Fund, although approved at COP 21 in Paris, is failing.

12. Failure of the Paris agreement required a victory.

13. Elimination of HFCs offered the opportunity to keep the focus on a human cause, link it to the false success of the Montreal Protocol and keep the entire AGW debacle afloat.

14. Dupont will likely produce the replacement refrigerant, and crony capitalism will continue. It is crony capitalism, not good business, because they know the proper science and make a conscious corporate decision. If they don’t know the science, then their license should be revoked.

The developing nations suffered from the original CFC ozone destruction claims. The developed world reduced their percentage of food loss between the farm and the table from approximately 60 percent to 30 percent. This was denied to the developing world when CFCs were banned. It was another example of Paul Driessen’s Eco-Imperialism, the imposition of western green agendas that are harmful to people in the
to promote the claims of the success of the Montreal Protocol. But while important, that is a minor character of the accomplished fiasco that summarizes as follows. 

 1. No empiric evidence exists to show that CFCs were creating “ hole in the ozone. ” 

 2. Ozone levels and their variability were and are lifelike. 

 3. assumed science was create to prove CFCs were a problem. 

 4. A political social organization was set up that used the false science to impose completely unnecessary restrictions on a across-the-board range of manufacturing, business, and casual activities. 

 5. Dupont produced CFCs primitively as an inert, safe, surrogate mostly for ammonia in refrigeration equipment. 

 6. Dupont did not oppose the ban on CFCs because they already had a substitution, HCFCs, and later HFCs, to advance crony capitalism. 

 7. politician pushed by the environmental lobbies produced the Montreal Protocol, that is similar to my description years ago of Kyoto as an unnecessary political solution to a non - existent scientific problem. 

 8. Most countries were part of the Montreal Protocol but were not required to consider any action. 

 9. A similar deception was create around CO2 with attempts to produce a political solution, the Kyoto Protocol. Again most countries were not command to take action. 

 10. The Kyoto Protocol collapsed when the false skill was exposed through leaked emails. 

 11. A replacement, the Green Climate Fund, although approved at COP 21 in Paris, is failing. 

 12. Failure of the Paris agreement required a victory. 

 13. Elimination of HFCs offered the opportunity to keep the focus on a human cause, connect it to the false achiever of the Montreal Protocol and observe the entire AGW debacle afloat. 

 14. Dupont will likely grow the replacement refrigerant, and crony capitalism will continue. It is crony capitalism, not beneficial business, because they know the proper science and make a conscious bodied decision. If they do n’t know the science, then their license should be revoked. 

 The developing state suffered from the original CFC ozone end claims. The developed world reduced their percentage of food passing between the farm and the table from approximately 60 percent to 30 percent. This was denied to the developing worldly concern when CFCs were banned. It was another example of Paul Driessen ’s Eco - Imperialism, the imposition of western green agendas that are harmful to people in the
 to promote the claims of tme success of thg Nontreel Protkcol. But while important, that is a mmnor part of the complete fiascu that sulmarizes as hollows.

1. No empirmdal evidence swists vo show that CFGs were credting “holes in tfe ozone.”

2. Ozone levels and their variafility eege and are natoral.

3. Gwlse science was created to prove CFCs were a problem.

4. A pokitical structure was set kp tjat used the false science to impjwe completelh unnecessary restrictjons on a wide range of manufacguriny, business, qne eggryday activmties.

5. Qupont produgvd CFCs originslly as an inevt, sahe, rwplacement mostly for ammonia in refriggration eqgi'ment.

6. Dupont did not ippose jhe bdn ov CFZs gerauae thej amready had a replacemwnt, HCFCs, and later HSBx, to advance crony cwpitalism.

7. Politicians pushed by the envpronjental lobbies produced the Montreal Protocop, that is similar to my description years ago of Kyoto as dn uniezeswavy puoihical solution to a non-existent scientific prjgltm.

8. Kost countries were part pf tng Montreal Projocol bbf sere not required ho take any qction.

9. A fimikar deception was created aeound CO2 witk artempts to produce a politicau sokutiom, the Kyoto Protocol. Agcin moat countried were nof required to takd abtiot.

10. The Kyoto Protocol colla[sed when the false rciemce waf exposed hhrounv leaked emails.

11. A geplaeemend, the Greej Climate Fund, although approvev at COP 21 in Karhs, ps failiny.

12. Failmre of the Parif agreement reauired c victury.

13. Eliminztion oh HFCs offerqd the opportgjity to keep the focts ob a yuman cxjse, link it to the falsv fuccwss of the Montreak Ptofocol and keep cke entire AGW debscld asllav.

14. Dupjtt will likeny pfodjve thd replacemekt fefrogerant, and crony ca[itamism will continue. Ib is croni capitalysm, not good nusiness, because tjey kiow thx proprr fcience and make a conscious ckrporate feclsion. If they don’b knjw the sciznce, then their license should be revokev.

The developing nations suffered from the pviginal CFC pzone destructhon claims. The develiped world reducec their percentage of food noss hetween the farm and the table from approximately 60 percent to 30 percent. Thus was denied to tge drveloiiny wprld wren RFRs were banned. It was another example of Paul Drmessen’s Ecm-Iiperialism, the imposition of wdstern green xgendas that are harmful to peopke in the
to promote the claims of the success Montreal But while that is a fiasco summarizes as follows. No empirical evidence to show that CFCs were creating in the ozone.” 2. Ozone levels and their variability were and are natural. False science was created to prove CFCs were a problem. 4. A political was up used false science to impose completely unnecessary restrictions on a wide range of manufacturing, business, and everyday 5. Dupont produced CFCs originally as an inert, replacement mostly for ammonia refrigeration equipment. 6. Dupont did oppose ban on because already a replacement, HCFCs, later HFCs, to advance crony capitalism. 7. Politicians pushed by the environmental lobbies produced the Montreal Protocol, is similar description years of as unnecessary political solution non-existent scientific problem. 8. Most countries the Montreal Protocol but were not required to any action. A similar deception was created around with attempts to produce a political solution, the Protocol. Again most countries were not required to take action. 10. The Kyoto Protocol collapsed false science was exposed leaked emails. 11. replacement, Green Fund, approved at 21 in Paris, is failing. 12. Failure of the Paris agreement a victory. 13. Elimination of HFCs offered the opportunity to focus a human cause, it to the false of Montreal Protocol and keep AGW afloat. likely the refrigerant, and crony capitalism continue. It is crony capitalism, good business, because they make a conscious corporate decision. If they don’t the science, then their license should be The developing nations suffered from the original CFC ozone destruction claims. The world reduced of food loss between the farm and the from approximately 60 percent 30 percent. This was denied to the developing world CFCs banned. It another example of Driessen’s Eco-Imperialism, the of western green are harmful people the
 to promote the claims of the suCcess of the montrEal proToCol. BUt whIle important, thAT is a Minor part of the complete FiascO tHAt suMMaRizes As folloWS.

1. NO EMpiRiCaL evIdENcE exisTs tO show thAt CFCs were CreAtIng “holes in thE OzOne.”

2. Ozone leVelS and their varIabIlity wErE anD Are naTurAl.

3. FalSe scieNCe was cReated to pRoVE CFCs wERe a probLEM.

4. A PoliTical structure was SEt UP that used the faLse sciEnCE tO IMpoSe cOmpletely uNnEcessARy restrICtIONS on A Wide range of maNufacturing, BUsiNess, anD eVerYDay actIvitiEs.

5. dUpoNt produced CfCs oRiginally As an inERt, safe, rEPlacemeNt mostLy fOr aMmonIA iN rEfrIgERatIOn EquIPmeNt.

6. Dupont DiD nOt oppOse tHE BAN on CfCs BecaUse thEy already had a RepLaceMEnt, hCFCs, And laTer HfCS, to adVance cRony cApItalism.

7. PoliticiAns pUshed by thE enViRonMeNtal lOBbies pRodUceD the MonTreal PrOTocOl, THAT iS similar to my descriPtION yEars ago oF Kyoto AS aN uNNecessarY pOliTicaL SOlutiOn to A NoN-existenT scienTIfIc Problem.

8. moSt counTrIes WerE part OF the montreAl ProtocOl but WEre not required TO take any actioN.

9. a sIMIlAR decEptIon was creatEd arOUnd Co2 witH AtTemPTs to pRoducE a POlITical solution, the KyoTo protocOl. AgaIn most countriEs were not rEQUIred to taKe acTIoN.

10. the Kyoto ProtocOl colLapsed when THe false sCiencE was expoSed througH LEaked emaIls.

11. a rePlaCemENT, tHe Green ClimatE fUnd, aLtHough apProVed at COp 21 in parIs, iS faIlIng.

12. FailurE of the PaRiS aGrEeMenT requIRed a victOrY.

13. ElImInaTion oF hFCs ofFered The oPpOrTUniTy to keeP ThE FOcus On A hUman CauSe, Link iT to tHE faLse succEss of the MOntREal PRoToCol and kEep the entire AgW Debacle aflOaT.

14. DuPont wiLL Likely prOduce the replacement refrIGerant, aNd cRony cApitAlism will ConTinue. IT is CRony caPitaliSm, not GoOd bUSIness, BECaUse ThEy know the pROPer ScienCe And mAke a conScious corporate decISioN. If they don’t knOw tHe scIENcE, thEN tHEir LiCEnsE SHould be revoked.

THe developiNg NAtIons sufferED frOm The origInal CFC Ozone DEstructIon claims. the develoPeD worLD RedUced their pErcentagE of food loSS betwEEn The faRm aNd the tAbLe fRom apProximATelY 60 percEnt to 30 pErCent. ThIs was DeNied to thE developing world when CFCS were bAnned. it wAs another ExaMPle Of Paul DriEsseN’s Eco-ImperIalIsm, The imPosITion oF wesTErN grEEn ageNdas THat are harMFuL to PEOpLe in the
 to promote the claims ofthe succes s ofthe  Mo nt real  Pro tocol. But whi l e im portant, that is a min or pa rt of t h ecompl ete fia s co t hat  s um mar iz e sas fo llo ws.

1.  No empiri cal  e vidence exis t sto show th atCFCs were cr eat ing “h ol esi n the  oz one.” 

2. O z one le vels andth e ir var i ability w er e an d are natural.

3 .  F a lse science wa s crea te d  t o pro veCFCs wereaprobl e m.

4.A  p o l i tic a l structure w as set up t h atused t he  fa l se sci enceto imp ose complet elyunnecessa ry res t riction s  on a w ide ra nge  of  man u fa ct uri ng ,  bu s in ess ,  an d everyd ay  a ctivi ties . 5 . Du pon t pr oduce d CFCs origin all y as aninert , saf e, r ep lacem ent mo stlyfo r ammonia in re frig eration e qui pm ent .
6. D u pont d idnot  oppose  the ba n  on  C F C s  b ecause they alread yh a da replac ement, HC FC s , and la te r H FCs, t o adv ance cr ony capi talism . 
7.  Politi ci ans pu sh edbythe e n viro nmenta l lobbie s pro d uced the Montr e al Protocol,t ha t is simi lar  to my desc ript i on y ears ag o o f  Kyot o asan un n ecessary politicalso lution  to a  non-existent  scientifi c p roblem.
8.M os t  countries wer e par t of the M o ntreal P rotoc ol but w ere not r e q uired to  ta keany  ac t i on .

9. A simil a r  dec ep tion wa s c reatedaro und  CO 2 w it h attempt s to pro du ce  a  p oli tical solution ,the  K yot o Pro t ocol.Again  mos tco u ntr ies wer e  n o t  req ui re d to  ta ke  acti on.10.  The Ky oto Proto col coll ap se d whenthe false sci en ce was exp os edthroug h leaked e mails.

11. A replaceme n t, theGre en Cl imat e Fund, a lth ough a ppr o ved at  COP 2 1 inPa ris , is fa i l in g.
1 2. Failure o f t he Pa ri s ag reement  required a victor y .
13. Eliminati onof H F C soff e re d  th eo ppo r t unity to keep t he focus o na  h uman cause ,  li nk  it tothe fal se su c cess of  the Mont real Prot oc ol a n d  ke ep the ent ire AGWdebacle a f loat. 
1 4. Du pon t will  l ike ly pr oducet herepla cement  r efrige rant,  a nd crony  capitalism will contin ue. It  is c ron y capital ism ,  no t good bu sine ss, becaus e t hey  know  th e  prop er s c ie nce and m akea  consciou s  c orp o r at e decision. I f  th ey do n’t know t he s cience, then thei r  license shoul d be r evo ked . 

Th edeveloping nat ion ss u ffered f ro m the origi nal CFCoz o ne de struct ion cl aims. T h e  d e velope d wo rld  reducedthe ir percent ag eo f food  los sbetwee n thef arma n d the table from  appr o x imate l y 6 0 per ce nt to 3 0  per cent. This  was denied  to th e de velop ing wor ld  whenCFC swere banne d . It wasanoth er exam pl e of  Pa ul Dri esse n ’ s Eco -Imp er ial ism, thei m po s it io n  of  wes terngr eenagendas t h at are h arm f ul to p eo ple i n the
 to_promote the_claims of the success_of the_Montreal_Protocol. But_while_important, that is_a minor part_of the complete fiasco_that summarizes as_follows.

1._No empirical evidence exists to show that CFCs were creating “holes in the ozone.”

2._Ozone_levels and_their_variability_were and are natural.

3. False_science was created to prove_CFCs were_a problem.

4. A political structure was set up_that_used the false_science to impose completely unnecessary restrictions on a wide_range of manufacturing, business, and everyday_activities.

5. Dupont produced_CFCs_originally_as an inert, safe,_replacement mostly for ammonia in refrigeration_equipment.

6. Dupont did not oppose the_ban on CFCs because they already had_a replacement, HCFCs, and later HFCs,_to advance crony capitalism.

7. Politicians_pushed by_the environmental lobbies produced the_Montreal Protocol, that_is similar_to my description_years ago of Kyoto as an_unnecessary political solution_to a non-existent scientific problem.

8. Most_countries_were part of_the_Montreal_Protocol but_were not required_to_take any_action.

9._A similar deception was created around_CO2_with attempts to produce a political solution,_the Kyoto Protocol. Again_most_countries were not required_to take action.

10. The Kyoto_Protocol collapsed when the false science_was exposed_through leaked_emails.

11. A replacement, the Green Climate Fund, although approved at COP_21 in Paris, is failing.

12. Failure_of the Paris agreement_required a_victory.

13._Elimination of HFCs_offered_the opportunity_to keep the focus on a human_cause, link_it to the false success of_the Montreal Protocol and_keep_the entire AGW debacle afloat.

14. Dupont_will likely produce the replacement refrigerant,_and crony capitalism will continue._It_is_crony capitalism, not good business,_because they know the proper science_and make a_conscious corporate decision. If they don’t know_the_science, then their license should be_revoked.

The_developing nations suffered from the original_CFC_ozone_destruction claims. The developed world_reduced their percentage of food loss_between the farm and the table from approximately 60_percent to 30_percent. This was denied to_the_developing_world when CFCs were banned. It was another example of_Paul Driessen’s_Eco-Imperialism, the imposition_of western green agendas that are harmful to people in_the