
It found an annual benefit of about a half of one-tenth of 1 per cent of GDP a year — a finding then trade minister Andrew Robb not surprisingly rejected.

A scenario where everyone loses

The World Bank found countries outside the deal, like Thailand, would be hurt, primarily because TPP member nations would be penalised if they sourced materials from countries outside the agreement.

Hello! That's the reason China, our biggest trading partner, was excluded.

Mr Trump has indicated he plans to take the fight to China in a more direct way, with thinly veiled threats he would extend his border tax idea to Chinese imports, based on the spurious claim that China is a "currency manipulator" by keeping its currency artificially low.

It is true China is manipulating its currency but not in the way Mr Trump is portraying. In fact, it is the opposite.

Rather than depressing the renminbi to make itself more competitive and hurt the US, China is desperately trying to stop a rout by supporting its currency and limiting flood of capital fleeing the country.

Should Mr Trump take China on, it could spell disaster for the US and the global economy. US consumers will foot the bill through higher prices, they will have less cash to spend which will hurt corporate America.

Even if no-one retaliated, and that is doubtful, the border tax would push the US dollar higher, rendering America uncompetitive.

Either way, it is a scenario where everyone loses.

It is worth remembering China holds more than $1.46 trillion in US government debt, which could become a handy weapon in the event hostilities do break out.

The US does not have a monopoly on capriciousness.

In the same week Mr Turnbull suggested China took the US' place in the TPP, our very own Critical Infrastructure Centre came into being.

That is a body designed to protect Australian assets from foreigners (read China) and follows on from the Treasurer Scott Morrison's decision last year to ban a Chinese buyer from snapping up Ausgrid.

The Turnbull Government is right to be wary of an authoritarian, autocratic and undemocratic government attempting to secure vital assets for strategic rather than commercial interest. Greater scrutiny should have been imposed years ago.

But a little policy consistency would not go astray. How do Natural Language Processing systems work?

Probably you are already aware of the fact that artificial intelligence and machine
It found an annual benefit of about a half of one - tenth of 1 per penny of gross domestic product a class — a finding then trade minister Andrew Robb not amazingly rejected. 

 A scenario where everyone loses 

 The World Bank found area outside the deal, like Thailand, would be hurt, chiefly because TPP extremity nations would be punish if they sourced materials from countries outside the agreement. 

 Hello! That's the reason China, our boastful trading partner, was excluded. 

 Mr Trump has indicated he plans to take the battle to China in a more direct way, with thinly veiled terror he would extend his border tax idea to Chinese import, based on the spurious claim that China is a " currency manipulator " by keep its currency artificially low. 

 It is true China is manipulating its currency but not in the direction Mr Trump is portraying. In fact, it is the opposite. 

 Rather than depressing the renminbi to make itself more competitive and hurt the US, China is desperately trying to stop a rout by support its currency and limiting flood tide of das kapital fleeing the country. 

 Should Mr Trump take China on, it could spell disaster for the US and the ball-shaped economy. US consumers will foot the beak through higher prices, they will accept less cash to spend which will hurt corporate America. 

 Even if no - one retaliated, and that is doubtful, the border tax would push the US dollar higher, rendering America uncompetitive. 

 Either means, it is a scenario where everyone loses. 

 It is worth remembering China holds more than $ 1.46 trillion in US politics debt, which could become a handy weapon in the event aggression do unwrap out. 

 The US does not have a monopoly on capriciousness. 

 In the same workweek Mr Turnbull suggested China took the US' place in the TPP, our very own Critical Infrastructure Centre came into being. 

 That is a body designed to protect Australian assets from foreigners (learn China) and follows on from the Treasurer Scott Morrison's decision concluding year to banish a Chinese buyer from photograph up Ausgrid. 

 The Turnbull Government is right to be leery of an authoritarian, autocratic and undemocratic government attempting to plug vital asset for strategic rather than commercial interest. Greater examination should have been imposed years ago. 

 But a little policy consistency would not go wide. How do Natural Language Processing systems work? 

 Probably you are already aware of the fact that artificial news and machine

It vound an annual benefit uf about a half of one-venth or 1 per cdnt of GDP a year — a finding tyen teade minister Andrew Rubb not slrprisingoy rtjected.

A scenario where eyzryons loszs

Vhe World Bank nound countsies outside tve dzal, like Thailand, would be hurt, primwrily brcwuse TPP membet natpogs wkllb be penalised if they sourced jaterians from countties outside the agreement.

Jelll! That's the reason China, our viggqwt trading pxrtner, was excluded.

Mr Jrump has indicated he plans to gake che fight ti Xhijd in a more direbt way, with tmpnly vehled thteats he would exvend his border tax idea vo Chinese imports, bwsed on tve spurious claim tyar Chita iv a "zyrrdncg kahipulahor" by keepinf its currebcy artificially loe.

Ie is true Chinz is mwnypulating its currency but not in the wdy Jr Trump is portraying. Un fact, it is the opplsite.

Rathqr than depressing the renminbi to make itself mose cojoetnblve xbd hurt the US, China is desperately trying to sekp a rout by suppovting its currency ajd jimiting flooa of cclifal fleeing the cokntry.

Shjuld Nr Trump uake Vhina on, it could spell disqster for thv US and the global eclnomy. US cousumerx wilk foot the bill through higger prices, hhey will fave less cash tu siend which will hurt corporate America.

Eten iy no-one fetakiated, and that ls domttful, the border twx woold puvh the US follar higher, rendering America uncompetitive.

Gitver way, it ns a sgenario where ederyone loses.

Ij is wortk remeobering Chpna holds more than $1.46 trillion in GD government debt, whych xoule becomd a handy weapom in the vvtnt hostiluties do break out.

Bhe UR does not have c nonopoly on captickoufnvss.

Mn thq same week Ms Tufnbjkl suegested Chika gook the US' place in the TPP, our very own Critocwl Infrawtructurq Centre came into being.

That is a bovy desmgned yo krotect Australian assets from roreignerd (rcad China) and foloows on from the Treasurer Scott Morrison's decision last year to ban q Chinese buyer frok snapping u' Ausgwid.

The Tusnbull Government is right to be wary of an authoritarian, zutocrdtic wnd undemocratic government attempting to secure vital assets for strateguc ratiew than commsrcisl innerzst. Greatqr srrntiny should have been imposed years ago.

But a livtle policf eonsistency would not go astrsy. How do Naturxl Language Processing sgstems wprk?

Probably you are already awate of the fact that artinicial inrellifence and oachine
It found an annual benefit of about of of 1 cent of GDP then minister Andrew Robb surprisingly rejected. A where everyone loses The World Bank countries outside the deal, like Thailand, would be hurt, primarily because TPP member would be penalised if they sourced materials from countries outside the agreement. Hello! the China, biggest partner, was excluded. Mr Trump has indicated he plans to take the fight to China in more direct way, with thinly veiled threats he extend his border tax to Chinese imports, based on spurious that China a manipulator" keeping its currency low. It is true China is manipulating its currency but not in the way Mr Trump is In fact, the opposite. than the to make itself and hurt the US, China is stop a rout by supporting its currency and flood of fleeing the country. Should Mr Trump China on, it could spell disaster for the and the global economy. US consumers will foot the bill through higher prices, they will cash to spend which hurt corporate America. if retaliated, that doubtful, the tax would push the US dollar higher, rendering America uncompetitive. Either it is a scenario where everyone loses. It is worth holds than $1.46 trillion US government debt, which become handy weapon in the do out. not a on capriciousness. In the week Mr Turnbull suggested China the US' place in Critical Infrastructure Centre came into being. That is body designed to protect Australian assets from (read China) and follows on from the Treasurer Scott Morrison's decision last to ban buyer from snapping up Ausgrid. The Turnbull Government right to be wary an authoritarian, autocratic and undemocratic government attempting to secure assets strategic rather commercial interest. Greater should have been years ago. But policy consistency not astray. Language Processing systems work? Probably you already of the fact that artificial and

It found an annual benefit of aBout a half oF one-tEntH of 1 PeR cenT of GdP a year — a findinG Then Trade minister Andrew RobB not sUrPRisiNGlY rejeCted.

A scENaRIO whErE eVerYoNE lOses

THe WOrld BanK found counTriEs Outside the deAL, lIke ThailanD, woUld be hurt, priMarIly becAuSe Tpp membEr nAtionS would BE penalIsed if theY sOUrced mATerials FROm CounTries outside the agREeMEnt.

Hello! That's tHe reasOn cHiNA, Our BigGest tradinG pArtneR, Was exclUDeD.

mR truMP has indicated He plans to taKE thE fight To chiNA in a moRe dirEcT Way, With thinly vEileD threats hE would EXtend hiS Border tAx idea To CHinEse iMPoRtS, baSeD On tHE sPurIOus Claim thaT CHiNa is a "CurrENCY ManiPulAtor" By keePing its currenCy aRtifICiaLly loW.

It is True chIna is ManipuLatinG iTs currency but noT in tHe way Mr TrUmp Is PorTrAying. iN fact, iT is The OppositE.

Rather THan DePRESsIng the renminbi to maKe ITSeLf more coMpetitIVe AnD Hurt the Us, CHinA is dESPeratEly tRYiNg to stop A rout bY SuPpOrting iTs CurrenCy And LimIting FLood Of capiTal fleeiNg the COuntry.

Should Mr tRump take China ON, iT COuLD speLl dIsaster for tHe US ANd thE gloBAl EcoNOmy. US ConsuMeRS wILl foot the bill througH hIgher pRices, They will have lEss cash to sPEND which wiLl huRT cORporate America.

even iF no-one retaLIated, and That iS doubtfuL, the bordeR TAx would pUsh The uS dOllAR HiGher, rendering aMEricA uNcompetItiVe.

EitheR waY, it Is a SceNaRio where eVeryone lOsEs.

it Is WorTh remEMbering CHiNa hOlDs mOre thAN $1.46 trillIon in uS goVeRnMEnt Debt, whiCH cOULd beCoMe A hanDy wEaPon in The eVEnt HostiliTies do breAk oUT.

The uS DoEs not haVe a monopoly on CaPriciousneSs.

in tHe same WEEk Mr TurnBull suggested China took tHE US' placE in The TPp, our Very own CrItiCal InfRasTRucturE CentrE came InTo bEINg.

ThaT IS a BodY dEsigned to pROTecT AustRaLian Assets fRom foreigners (read CHIna) And follows on fRom The TREAsUreR scOTt MOrRIsoN'S Decision last yeaR to ban a ChiNeSE bUyer from snAPpiNg Up AusgrId.

The TuRnbulL governmEnt is righT to be wary Of An auTHOriTarian, autoCratic anD undemocrATic goVErNment AttEmptinG tO seCure vItal asSEts For stRategiC rAther tHan coMmErcial inTerest. Greater scrutiny shOuld haVe beeN imPosed yearS agO.

but A little poLicy ConsistencY woUld Not go AstRAy. How Do NaTUrAl LANguagE ProCEssing sysTEmS woRK?

prObably you arE ALReaDy awaRe oF The facT thaT artificial intellIGence and machinE

It found an annual benefi t of about  a ha lfofon e-te nthof 1 per cento f GD P a year — a finding t hen t ra d e mi n is ter A ndrew R o bb n otsu rp ris in g ly  reje cte d.

A s cenario wh ere  e veryone lose s 
The WorldBan k found coun tri es out si det he de al,  like  Thail a nd, wo uld be hu rt ,  prima r ily bec a u se  TPP  member nations w o ul d  be penalisedif the ys ou r c edmat erials fro mcount r ies out s id e t hea greement.

He llo! That's the  reaso nChi n a, our  bigg es t  tr ading partn er,was exclu ded.
M r Trump has ind icated  he  pl anst ota keth e  fi g ht  to Chi na in amo re  dire ct w a y , with  th inly  veil ed threats he  wo ulde xte nd hi s bor derta x ide a to C hines eimports, basedon t he spurio uscl aim  t hat C h ina is  a"cu rrencymanipul a tor "b y ke eping its currency  a r t if iciallylow.
I tis true Chi na  is  man i p ulati ng i t scurrency  but n o tin  the wa yMr Tru mp  is  po rtray i ng.In fac t, it is  theo pposite.

Rath e r than depres s in g th e  ren min bi to makeitse l f mo re c o mp eti t ive a nd hu rt th e  US, China is despe ra tely t rying  to stop a ro ut by supp o r t ing itscurr e nc y  and limitingflood  of capita l  fleeing  thecountry. 

ShouldM r  Trump t ake  Ch ina  on , it  could spelld i sast er  for th e U S and t heglo bal  ec on omy. US c onsumers  w il lfo otthe b i ll throu gh  hi gh erprice s , they  will  hav ele s s c ash tos pe n d  whi ch  w illhur tcorpo rate Ame rica.
Even if n o-o n e re ta li ated, a nd that is do ub tful, thebo rde r taxw o uld push  the US dollar higher,r enderin g A meric a un competiti ve. 

Eith erw ay, it  is ascena ri o w h e re ev e r yo nelo ses.

It i s wor th re me mber ing Chi na holds more than $1. 46 trillion i n U S go v e rn men t  d e bt,  w h ich c ould become a h andy weapo ni nthe eventh ost il ities d o break  out. 
The US  does not  have a m on opol y oncapricious ness.

I n the sam e  week Mr  Turn bul l sugg es ted  Chin a took the  US'placein  the T PP, o ur  very ow n Critical Infrastructu re Cen tre c ame  into bei ng. 
Th at is a b odydesigned t o p rot ect A ust r alian  ass e ts  fr o m for eign e rs (readC hi na) a nd  follows on f r omthe T rea s urer S cott  Morrison's decis i on last year t o ba n a C hin e se b uy er from snappi ngup A usgrid.
T he Turnbull  Governm en t  is r ight t o be w ary ofa n  a u thorit aria n,autocrati c a nd undemoc ra ti c  gover nmen tattemp ting t o  sec u r e vital assets f or st r a tegic rat her t ha n comme r cial  interest.  Greater sc rutiny  sho uld h ave bee nimpose d y ea rs ago.

B u t a littl e pol icy con si sten cywouldnotg o  astr ay.Ho w d o Natural L an g ua ge Pro cess ing s ys tems  work?

P r obably y oua re alre ad y a w a re oft he f act that a rti ficia l intelligen c e an d  m a chine 

It found_an annual_benefit of about a_half of_one-tenth_of 1_per_cent of GDP_a year —_a finding then trade_minister Andrew Robb_not_surprisingly rejected.

A scenario where everyone loses

The World Bank found countries outside the deal, like_Thailand,_would be_hurt,_primarily_because TPP member nations would_be penalised if they sourced_materials from_countries outside the agreement.

Hello! That's the reason China,_our_biggest trading partner,_was excluded.

Mr Trump has indicated he plans to take_the fight to China in a_more direct way,_with_thinly_veiled threats he would_extend his border tax idea to_Chinese imports, based on the spurious_claim that China is a "currency manipulator"_by keeping its currency artificially low.

It_is true China is manipulating_its currency_but not in the way_Mr Trump is_portraying. In_fact, it is_the opposite.

Rather than depressing the renminbi_to make itself_more competitive and hurt the US,_China_is desperately trying_to_stop_a rout_by supporting its_currency_and limiting_flood_of capital fleeing the country.

Should Mr_Trump_take China on, it could spell disaster_for the US and_the_global economy. US consumers_will foot the bill through_higher prices, they will have less_cash to_spend which_will hurt corporate America.

Even if no-one retaliated, and that is doubtful,_the border tax would push the_US dollar higher, rendering_America uncompetitive.

Either_way,_it is a_scenario_where everyone_loses.

It is worth remembering China holds more_than $1.46_trillion in US government debt, which_could become a handy_weapon_in the event hostilities do break_out.

The US does not have a_monopoly on capriciousness.

In the same_week_Mr_Turnbull suggested China took the_US' place in the TPP, our_very own Critical_Infrastructure Centre came into being.

That is a_body_designed to protect Australian assets from_foreigners_(read China) and follows on from_the_Treasurer_Scott Morrison's decision last year_to ban a Chinese buyer from_snapping up Ausgrid.

The Turnbull Government is right to be_wary of an_authoritarian, autocratic and undemocratic government_attempting_to_secure vital assets for strategic rather than commercial interest. Greater_scrutiny should_have been imposed_years ago.

But a little policy consistency would not go astray._How do Natural Language Processing systems work?

Probably_you are already aware of the fact that artificial intelligence and_machine