ly embarked on the latter. After its Obamacare and homosexual marriage decisions, Americans must now realize they no longer live in a democracy. They now live in a SCOTUSocracy. They are now governed by judicial rather than political decision-making.

In both its Obamacare decisions, SCOTUS rewrote federal law. In its homosexual marriage decision, however, it went even farther and actually wrote de novo federal law. SCOTUS has no constitutional power to write or rewrite federal law. In fact, SCOTUS has no constitutional power even to judicially review the constitutionality of federal law.

The net effect is this: not only has SCOTUS usurped the constitutional powers of the federal legislature, but it has now also denied Americans their most basic constitutional right – the right to democratically govern themselves through their political representatives.

You see, Americans elect their political representatives every two, four, or six years. Thus do Americans, through their political representatives, democratically make and execute their own laws. If Americans don’t like the way their legislators make their laws, they can elect new legislators who will make laws they do like. If Americans don’t like the way their executives execute their laws, they can elect new executives who will execute their laws the way they do like. That’s how the governing will of sovereign people democratically expresses itself in a Republic.

The very word “Republic” says it all. The word derives from “res publica.” That literally means “the public thing.” The American Republic is a form of government (the thing) in which the American people (the public) are – by the land’s supreme law – sovereign.

But Americans don’t elect federal judges every two, four, or six years. In fact, federal judges aren’t elected at all – ever. Instead, they’re appointed, for the duration of their entire lives. If Americans don’t like the way their judges adjudicate, they can’t elect new judges who will adjudicate the way they do like. Americans can only endure judges until they resign or die. Or else impeach them.

Most Americans probably don’t realize that SCOTUS has no constitutional power to judicially review the constitutionality of federal law. That it has done so for 212 long years stems simply from its unilateral judicial assumption of that unconstitutional power in an 1803 case involving William Marbury’s dispute with James Madison over the delivery of a justice of the peace
ly embarked on the latter. After its Obamacare and homosexual marriage decisions, Americans must now realize they no longer exist in a majority rule. They now live in a SCOTUSocracy. They are nowadays govern by judicial rather than political decisiveness - making. 

 In both its Obamacare decisions, SCOTUS rewrote union jurisprudence. In its homosexual marriage decision, however, it go even farther and actually wrote de novo federal law. SCOTUS take no constitutional power to write or rewrite federal law. In fact, SCOTUS has no built-in power even to judicially review the constitutionality of federal law. 

 The final effect is this: not only has SCOTUS assume the constitutional power of the federal legislature, but it has now also denied Americans their most basic built-in right – the right to democratically govern themselves through their political representatives. 

 You see, Americans elect their political representatives every two, four, or six years. Thus do Americans, through their political representatives, democratically make and execute their own laws. If Americans do n’t like the way their legislators make their laws, they can elect fresh legislators who will make police they cause like. If Americans do n’t like the way their executives perform their laws, they can elect new executives who will execute their law the way they do like. That ’s how the governing will of sovereign people democratically expresses itself in a Republic. 

 The identical word “ Republic ” says it all. The word derives from “ res publica. ” That literally means “ the public thing. ” The American Republic is a phase of government (the thing) in which the American people (the public) are – by the land ’s supreme law – autonomous. 

 But Americans do n’t elect federal judges every two, four, or six years. In fact, federal judges are n’t elected at all – ever. Instead, they ’re appoint, for the duration of their entire lives. If Americans do n’t wish the way their judges adjudicate, they ca n’t elect new judge who will adjudicate the room they do like. Americans can only endure judges until they vacate or die. Or else accuse them. 

 Most Americans probably do n’t realize that SCOTUS has no constitutional ability to judicially review the constitutionality of federal law. That it has done indeed for 212 long years stem simply from its unilateral judicial assumption of that unconstitutional exponent in an 1803 case involving William Marbury ’s dispute with James Madison over the delivery of a justice of the peace
ly fmbarked on the latter. Anter its Obamacate and hmmosexhal marrkage decisions, Americans musv noq reaoize they no longer lixe in a dvmocracy. Rhey bow live ii a SCOTMFocrzgy. Thzy are now goverked by judiwial rather thdn pllitical decision-making.

In both its Jbamacate decisions, SCOJUS rtwrjte rvdtral law. In its homosexual marriafe decivion, however, ot went even farther and aftuaply wrote de novo vederal law. SCOEYS has no covstitutional power to srite or rewrite federal law. In fact, SCOTUS haw bo fmnstitutionel powvr even to judicially review the constitutlonalmty if federal law.

The net effect is this: noj only has SEOTUS usurped the conwtututimnal powdes uf uhe fsderal lejislature, bht it has niw also denied Amerocwbs their most basic cjnstitutional right – the right to democgatidally govern themselves through their politifal reprefentatives.

You see, Americans elect their political reprxsdntcblves wvfry two, four, or six years. Thus do Americans, trdoigm their politicaj representstlvrf, democraticauly make znd execute their lwn lawf. If Qmericans don’y like the way their legislqtors make tkeie laws, they can elzct new legirlatprs wno will make laws they bo liks. If Americwns don’t mkke the way theif eqecudives extzute their laws, trey can eoect new exdcutoves wro will exfcute their laws the way they dm like. Thah’s how the governing will of sotxreign people damobraticallv exprcsses itself in a Republic.

The very wjrd “Rdpublic” sajs it all. The word dqrives from “rad publica.” Thet literajly neanw “the pjclic thing.” The American Republic us a form of goverkment (fhe thing) in whneh the American propue (ehv pnblic) dre – by the nand’r sjlreme law – sovercigv.

But Americans don’t elecd feseral judges every tro, four, ir six yqars. In fact, gederal judges arej’t elxcted et all – eder. Instead, they’re appointed, fkr the dugatlon of their qntive lyves. If Amzricans don’t like the way their judges avjudicate, they can’t elgct new judges who wikk adjudicatx the ray they go like. Americans cab only endure judnes until they resign kr die. Or epse impeach them.

Most Americans probably don’t realize that SCOTUS has no cinstitntyonal power to kudicpaljv revier thx ronstitutionality of federal law. That it has donx so for 212 noug years stems simply from itx jnilateral juaicial assumption of thaf unconsyitutional power in an 1803 case infolving William Marbury’s dispute with James Madmson over the delivety of c justuce of rhe ieace
ly embarked on the latter. After its homosexual decisions, Americans now realize they democracy. now live in SCOTUSocracy. They are governed by judicial rather than political In both its Obamacare decisions, SCOTUS rewrote federal law. In its homosexual marriage however, it went even farther and actually wrote de novo federal law. SCOTUS no power write rewrite federal law. In fact, SCOTUS has no constitutional power even to judicially review the constitutionality federal law. The net effect is this: not has SCOTUS usurped the powers of the federal legislature, it now also Americans most constitutional right – right to democratically govern themselves through their political representatives. You see, Americans elect their political representatives every four, or Thus do through political democratically make and own laws. If Americans don’t like legislators make their laws, they can elect new who will laws they do like. If Americans like the way their executives execute their laws, can elect new executives who will execute their laws the way they do like. That’s governing will of sovereign democratically expresses itself a The word says it The word derives from “res publica.” That literally means “the public The American Republic is a form of government (the thing) the people (the public) – by the land’s law sovereign. But Americans don’t judges two, years. fact, judges aren’t elected at – ever. Instead, they’re appointed, the duration of their like the way their judges adjudicate, they can’t new judges who will adjudicate the way do like. Americans can only endure judges until they resign or die. else impeach Americans probably don’t realize that SCOTUS has no power to judicially review constitutionality of federal law. That it has done so 212 years stems from its unilateral assumption of that power in an involving William dispute James delivery of a justice of the
ly embarked on the latter. AfteR its ObamacAre anD hoMosExUal mArriAge decisions, AmERicaNs must now realize they no LongeR lIVe in A DeMocraCy. They nOW lIVE in A ScOtUSOcRAcY. They Are Now goveRned by judiCiaL rAther than polITiCal decisioN-maKing.

In both itS ObAmacarE dEciSIons, ScOTuS rewRote feDEral laW. In its homOsEXual maRRiage deCISiOn, hoWever, it went even faRThER and actually wrOte de nOvO FeDERal Law. sCOTUS has nO cOnstiTUtional POwER TO wrITe or rewrite feDeral law. In fACt, ScOTUS hAs No cONstituTionaL pOWer Even to judicIallY review thE constITutionaLIty of feDeral lAw.

THe nEt efFEcT iS thIs: NOt oNLy Has scOTuS usurpeD tHe ConstItutIONAL powErs Of thE fedeRal legislaturE, buT it hAS noW also DenieD AmeRiCans tHeir moSt basIc Constitutional rIght – The right tO deMoCraTiCally GOvern tHemSelVes throUgh theiR PolItICAL rEpresentatives.

You sEe, aMErIcans eleCt theiR PoLiTIcal reprEsEntAtivES Every Two, fOUr, Or six yeaRs. Thus DO AMeRicans, tHrOugh thEiR poLitIcal rEPresEntatiVes, democRaticALly make and execUTe their own lawS. if aMErICans Don’T like the way TheiR LegiSlatORs MakE Their Laws, tHeY CaN Elect new legislators WhO will mAke laWs they do like. IF Americans DON’T like the Way tHEiR Executives execUte thEir laws, theY Can elect New exEcutives Who will exECUte their LawS thE waY thEY Do Like. That’s how tHE GoveRnIng will Of sOvereigN peOplE deMocRaTically exPresses iTsElF iN a repUblic.

tHe very woRd “repUbLic” Says iT All. The Word dErivEs FrOM “reS publicA.” thAT LiteRaLlY meaNs “tHe PubliC thiNG.” ThE AmericAn RepubliC is A Form Of GoVernmenT (the thing) in whIcH the AmericAn PeoPle (the PUBlic) are – bY the land’s supreme law – soveREign.

But ameRicanS don’T elect fedEraL judgeS evERy two, fOur, or sIx yeaRs. in fACT, fedeRAL jUdgEs Aren’t electED At aLl – eveR. INsteAd, they’rE appointed, for the duRAtiOn of their entiRe lIves. iF amEriCAnS Don’T lIKe tHE Way their judges aDjudicate, tHeY CaN’t elect new JUdgEs Who will AdjudicAte thE Way they Do like. AmeRicans can OnLy enDURe jUdges until They resiGn or die. Or ELse imPEaCh theM.

MoSt AmerIcAns ProbaBly don’T ReaLize tHat SCOtUs has no ConstItUtional pOwer to judicially review tHe consTitutIonAlity of feDerAL laW. That it haS donE so for 212 long YeaRs sTems sImpLY from Its uNIlAteRAl judIciaL AssumptioN Of ThaT UNcOnstitutionAL POweR in an 1803 CasE InvolvIng WIlliam Marbury’s disPUte with James MaDisoN OVer The DElivErY of a justice of tHe pEaCE
ly embarked on the latter.  After its  Obam aca rean d ho mose xual marriaged ecis ions, Americans must n ow re al i ze t h ey  no l onger l i ve i n a  d em ocr ac y .Theynow  live i n a SCOTUS ocr ac y. They aren ow  governedbyjudicial rat her  thanpo lit i cal d eci sion- making . 

In b oth its O ba m acared ecision s ,  S COTU S rewrote federal la w . In its homos exualma r ri a g e d eci sion, howe ve r, it went ev e nf a r the r  and actually  wrote de n o vofedera llaw .  SCOTU S has  n o  co nstitutiona l po wer to wr ite or rewrite federal  law.Infac t, S C OT US  ha sn o c o ns tit u tio nal powe rev en to  jud i c i a llyrev iewthe c onstitutional ity  off ede ral l aw.
Thene t eff ect is  this :not only has SC OTUS  usurpedthe  c ons ti tutio n al pow ers  of  the fe deral l e gis la t u r e,  but it has now al so d en ied Amer icanst he ir most bas ic  co nsti t u tiona l ri g ht  – the r ight t o  d em ocratic al ly gov er n t hem selve s  thr ough t heir pol itica l  representativ e s.

You see,A me r i ca n s el ect  their poli tica l  rep rese n ta tiv e s eve ry tw o, fo u r, or six years. Th us  do Am erica ns, through t heir polit i c a l repres enta t iv e s, democratica lly m ake and ex e cute the ir ow n laws.If Americ a n s don’tlik e t heway t he ir legislator s make  t heir la ws,  they c anele ctnew  l egislator s who wi ll  m ak elaw s the y  do like .IfAm eri cansd on’t l ike t he w ay  t h eir  execut i ve s exec ut ethei r l aw s, th ey c a n e lect ne w executi ves whowi ll  execut e their lawsth e way they  d o l ike. T h a t’s howthe governing will of s o vereign  pe opledemo craticall y e xpress esi tselfin a R epubl ic .
T h e ver y wo rd“R epublic” s a y s i t all .Theword de rives from “res pu b lic a.” That lite ral ly m e a ns  “t h ep ubl ic thi n g .” The American  Republicis aform of go v ern me nt (the  thing)  in w h ich the  American  people ( th e pu b l ic)  are – bythe land ’s suprem e  law–  s overe ign .

But  A mer icans  don’t ele ct fe deralju dges e verytw o, four,  or six years. In fact,  feder al ju dge s aren’tele c ted  at all –  eve r. Instead , t hey ’re a ppo i nted,  for th e d u ratio n of their ent i re  li v e s.  If America n s don ’t li ket he way  the ir judges adjudic a te, they can’t  ele c t  ne w j u dges  w ho will adjudi cat et h e way th ey  do like. A mericans  c a n onl y endu re jud ges unt i l  t h ey res ignordie. Or e lse  i m peach t he m. 
MostAmer ic ans pr obably don’ t realize that SCO TUS h a s  no c o nst ituti on al powe r  tojudicially  review the  const itut ional ity offe derallaw .That it ha s  done sofor 2 12 long  y ears  st ems si mply f rom i ts u ni lat eral judi c i al as su m pti on o f tha tunco nstitutio n al power  in an 1803  c ase i nvolvi n gW i lliam Marb ury ’s di s p ute with J a mesM ad i son o ver th e deli very of a j us tice of  th e peace
ly embarked_on the_latter. After its Obamacare_and homosexual_marriage_decisions, Americans_must_now realize they_no longer live_in a democracy. They_now live in_a_SCOTUSocracy. They are now governed by judicial rather than political decision-making.

In both its Obamacare_decisions,_SCOTUS rewrote_federal_law._In its homosexual marriage decision,_however, it went even farther_and actually_wrote de novo federal law. SCOTUS has no_constitutional_power to write_or rewrite federal law. In fact, SCOTUS has no_constitutional power even to judicially review_the constitutionality of_federal_law.

The_net effect is this:_not only has SCOTUS usurped the_constitutional powers of the federal legislature,_but it has now also denied Americans_their most basic constitutional right –_the right to democratically govern_themselves through_their political representatives.

You see, Americans_elect their political_representatives every_two, four, or_six years. Thus do Americans, through_their political representatives,_democratically make and execute their own_laws._If Americans don’t_like_the_way their_legislators make their_laws,_they can_elect_new legislators who will make laws_they_do like. If Americans don’t like the_way their executives execute_their_laws, they can elect_new executives who will execute_their laws the way they do_like. That’s_how the_governing will of sovereign people democratically expresses itself in a Republic.

The_very word “Republic” says it all._The word derives from_“res publica.”_That_literally means “the_public_thing.” The_American Republic is a form of government_(the thing)_in which the American people (the_public) are – by_the_land’s supreme law – sovereign.

But Americans_don’t elect federal judges every two,_four, or six years. In_fact,_federal_judges aren’t elected at all_– ever. Instead, they’re appointed, for_the duration of_their entire lives. If Americans don’t like_the_way their judges adjudicate, they can’t_elect_new judges who will adjudicate the_way_they_do like. Americans can only_endure judges until they resign or_die. Or else impeach them.

Most Americans probably don’t realize_that SCOTUS has_no constitutional power to judicially_review_the_constitutionality of federal law. That it has done so for_212 long_years stems simply_from its unilateral judicial assumption of that unconstitutional power in_an 1803 case involving William Marbury’s dispute_with James Madison over the delivery of a justice of the_peace