 involves the agreement on the reduction of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC). The Paris Climate Agreement is disintegrating for a variety of reasons all of them inherent in the science and politics from the start of the AGW deception. Promoters of AGW needed a victory, an agreement that appeared to show success in dealing with the alarmism they created. They had to show that Protocols, like the Kyoto Protocol or its replacement the Green Climate Fund (GCF), are effective. They reached back to the Montreal Protocol that they claim was successful. HFCs became a crossover vehicle, a political/science hybrid.

As one commentator explained,

The Montreal Protocol is the world’s most successful environmental treaty, already doing double duty saving the ozone layer and curbing climate change. With global climate action needed now more than ever, sealing an HFC deal under the Montreal Protocol is the biggest thing that can be done this year to build on the Paris agreement and protect our children’s future.

When the planet or children’s future are threatened In fact, the Montreal Protocol only appeared to succeed. This is because they applied the major distorting assumption of most environmental disaster claims. A natural change occurs and it is exploited as an unnatural change. Most people think that all change is gradual over long periods of time and variation in nature is almost non-existent. From this, it appears logical to claim that any change is unnatural and caused by humans. The ozone, like all other natural variables, varies considerably over short time periods.

A few years ago I was summoned to appear before the Canadian Parliamentary Committee on Ozone in Ottawa. I did not want to go because I know these are orchestrated charades. The truth is not the objective for government or opposition but simply for politicians to promote either a party or a political agenda. It turned out that it was quasi-judicial and I had to appear. A few things happened at the hearing that relate to the current HFC claims.

A delegation from Dupont attended but remained, to my surprise, quiet. I spoke with some of them after. They knew the science was wrong. The silence was because they had a replacement ready and stood to make more money and also gain a PR coup. As Dupont note

Today, DuPont manufactures hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) as alternatives to CFCs for the air conditioning and refrigeration industries.

A York University (
involves the agreement on the reduction of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC). The Paris Climate Agreement is disintegrating for a variety of reason all of them built-in in the science and politics from the start of the AGW deception. showman of AGW needed a victory, an agreement that appeared to express achiever in dealing with the alarmism they created. They had to show that Protocols, like the Kyoto Protocol or its refilling the Green Climate Fund (GCF), are effective. They reached back to the Montreal Protocol that they claim was successful. HFCs become a crossing vehicle, a political / science hybrid. 

 As one commentator explained, 

 The Montreal Protocol is the universe ’s most successful environmental treaty, already doing double duty save the ozone layer and curbing climate change. With global climate military action needed now more than ever, sealing an HFC deal under the Montreal Protocol is the big thing that can be done this year to build on the Paris agreement and protect our children ’s future. 

 When the satellite or child ’s future are threatened In fact, the Montreal Protocol only appeared to succeed. This is because they applied the major distorting assumption of most environmental disaster claims. A natural variety happen and it is exploited as an affected variety. Most multitude think that all change is gradual over retentive periods of time and variation in nature is almost non - real. From this, it appears logical to claim that any change is unnatural and caused by humans. The ozone, like all early natural variables, varies considerably over short time periods. 

 A few year ago I was summoned to appear before the Canadian Parliamentary Committee on Ozone in Ottawa. I did not want to go because I know these are orchestrate charades. The truth is not the objective for politics or opposition but just for politicians to promote either a party or a political agenda. It plow out that it was quasi - discriminative and I had to appear. A few things happened at the hearing that associate to the current HFC claims. 

 A deputation from Dupont attended but persist, to my surprise, quiet. I spoke with some of them after. They knew the science was incorrect. The silence was because they have a replacement ready and stood to make more money and besides gain a PR coup d'etat. As Dupont note 

 Today, DuPont manufactures hydrochlorofluorocarbons (hydrochlorofluorocarbon) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) as alternatives to CFCs for the air conditioning and refrigeration industries. 

 A York University (
 ingolves the agreement on uhe reduction of Ktdroflnorocargons (HFC). The Paris Climate Agreement iw disuntegrating for a varidty of rewsons alo of rhem inherxht in tmz sciskce aud politics from the start of the AGW deweotnon. Promoters of AGW needed a victorr, an agtefment that appgared eo sgow success in dealing with the alzrmism uhey created. They nad to show that Protocols, likf the Kyoto Protocll or its rgllaswment the Grden Climatt Yund (GCF), arg effective. They reached back to the Kontreal Ptofofml that theb claii was successful. HFCv becamr a crossover yehicne, q political/science hyurid.

As one commentatjr explaiteb,

The Montreal Protocoo us thg wornd’s oist sudcxssrul engirknmental tdeaty, alreaey doing double dutu fqving the ozohe layqr and curbing climate change. With global cljmate action needed now more than ever, sealijg an HFC deal under the Montreal Protocol is the biggest dhing ghau gwv bf done this year to build on the Paris agreemqht akd protect our cmildren’s future.

Whem hhr planet or chkldren’s fhture are threatenfd In fwct, tye Montrewl Ptotocol only appeared to suxceed. This if because they applned the majox distprtinb assumption of most enrironmsntal disasher claima. A natural changd obcurv and it is exploited as ag unnaturel chcnge. Mosg pepple trink that wll cmdnge is gradual ovfr loug pesiods of tlme and variation in nature is ekmost non-exixtant. From thns, it sppears logicwl to claim thct any ckange ks unnaturzl and raused by huians. The ozona, like all otier naturwl vqriavles, vafkes considerabky over skjrt rime periods.

A few nears zgo I was summoutd uo appear before thd Cwnwdman Pwsliamentary Wommkttdr on Uzone in Otbawx. I cid not want to go bacauae I know these arr jrchestrqted chawades. The truyh is not the objeftive foc govetnmgnt or opposition but simply fod politiclanf to promote eitmer w party or a political agenda. It turned out that mt was quasi-judicial ane I had to appear. A new things heppeneq at the vearing that relate ro the current HFG claims.

A delegation fdom Du[ont wttended but remained, to my surprise, quiet. I spoke with some of them aftee. They knew the scjencr was wxony. The sylenre was because thej had a replacement ready and stuod to mdkz more money and also gain a LR coup. As Dupovt note

Today, DuPont manuractures hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (MFCs) as aoternztives to RFCs for the air concitionnng ane refriterabion industrier.

A Uovk Universlty (
involves the agreement on the reduction of The Climate Agreement disintegrating for a them in the science politics from the of the AGW deception. Promoters of needed a victory, an agreement that appeared to show success in dealing with alarmism they created. They had to show that Protocols, like the Kyoto Protocol its the Climate (GCF), are effective. They reached back to the Montreal Protocol that they claim was successful. HFCs a crossover vehicle, a political/science hybrid. As one explained, The Montreal Protocol the world’s most successful environmental already double duty the layer curbing climate change. global climate action needed now more than ever, sealing an HFC deal under the Montreal Protocol is biggest thing be done year build the Paris agreement our children’s future. When the planet are threatened In fact, the Montreal Protocol only to succeed. is because they applied the major assumption of most environmental disaster claims. A natural occurs and it is exploited as an unnatural change. Most people think that all change over long periods of and variation in is non-existent. this, appears logical claim that any change is unnatural and caused by humans. The like all other natural variables, varies considerably over short time few ago I was to appear before the Parliamentary on Ozone in Ottawa. not to know are charades. The truth is the objective for government or but simply for politicians or a political agenda. It turned out that was quasi-judicial and I had to appear. few things happened at the hearing that relate to the current HFC A delegation attended but remained, to my surprise, quiet. I with some of them They knew the science was wrong. The silence was they a replacement and stood to more money and gain a PR Dupont note DuPont hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HFCs) as alternatives to CFCs for air and refrigeration industries. A York (
 involves the agreement on the Reduction oF HydrOflUorOcArboNs (HFc). The Paris ClimaTE AgrEement is disintegrating For a vArIEty oF ReAsons All of thEM iNHEreNt In The ScIEnCe and PolItics frOm the start Of tHe aGW deception. pRoMoters of AGw neEded a victory, An aGreemeNt ThaT AppeaRed To shoW succeSS in deaLing with tHe ALarmisM They creATEd. they Had to show that ProtOCoLS, like the Kyoto PRotocoL oR ItS REplAceMent the GreEn climaTE Fund (GCf), ArE EFFecTIve. They reacheD back to the MONtrEal ProToCol THat theY claiM wAS suCcessful. HFCS becAme a crossOver veHIcle, a poLItical/sCience HybRid.

as onE CoMmEntAtOR exPLaIneD,

the montreal prOtOcol iS the WORLD’s moSt sUcceSsful Environmental TreAty, aLReaDy doiNg douBle dUtY saviNg the oZone lAyEr and curbing cliMate Change. WitH glObAl cLiMate aCTion neEdeD noW more thAn ever, sEAliNg AN hfC Deal under the MontreAl pROtOcol is thE biggeST tHiNG that can Be DonE thiS YEar to BuilD On The Paris AgreemENt AnD protecT oUr chilDrEn’s FutUre.

WhEN the Planet Or childrEn’s fuTUre are threatenED In fact, the MonTReAL prOTocoL onLy appeared tO sucCEed. THis iS BeCauSE they AppliEd THe MAjor distorting assumPtIon of mOst enVironmental diSaster claiMS. a Natural cHangE OcCUrs and it is explOited As an unnatuRAl change. most pEople thiNk that all CHAnge is grAduAl oVer LonG PErIods of time and VARiatIoN in natuRe iS almost Non-ExiSteNt. FRoM this, it apPears logIcAl To ClAim That aNY change iS uNnaTuRal And caUSed by hUmans. the oZoNe, LIke All otheR NaTURal vArIaBles, VarIeS consIderABly Over shoRt time perIodS.

a few YeArS ago I waS summoned to apPeAr before thE CAnaDian PaRLIamentarY Committee on Ozone in OttaWA. I did noT waNt to gO becAuse I know TheSe are oRchEStrateD charaDes. ThE tRutH IS not tHE ObJecTiVe for goverNMEnt Or oppOsItioN but simPly for politicians tO ProMote either a paRty Or a pOLItIcaL AgENda. it TUrnED Out that it was quaSi-judicial AnD i hAd to appear. a Few ThIngs hapPened at The heARing thaT relate to The currenT HfC clAIMs.

A Delegation From DupoNt attendeD But reMAiNed, to My sUrprisE, qUieT. I spoKe with SOme Of theM after. thEy knew The scIeNce was wrOng. The silence was because They haD a repLacEment readY anD StoOd to make mOre mOney and alsO gaIn a pR couP. As dUpont Note

tOdAy, DUpont mAnufACtures hydROcHloROFlUorocarbons (hcfcs) aNd hydRofLUorocaRbonS (HFCs) as alternativES to CFCs for the aIr coNDItiOniNG and ReFrigeration indUstRiES.

a York UniVeRsity (
 involves the agreement on  the reduc tionofHyd ro fluo roca rbons (HFC). T h e Pa ris Climate Agreementis di si n tegr a ti ng fo r a var i et y ofre as ons  a l lof th eminheren t in the s cie nc e and politi c sfrom the s tar t of the AGW  de ceptio n.  Pr o moter s o f AGW  neede d  a vic tory, anag r eement that ap p e ar ed t o show success in de a ling with thealarmi sm th e y  cr eat ed. They h ad  to s h ow that Pr o t o col s , like the Ky oto Protoco l  or  its r ep lac e ment t he Gr ee n  Cl imate Fund(GCF ), are ef fectiv e . Theyr eachedback t o t heMont r ea lPro to c olt ha t t h eyclaim wa ssu ccess ful. H F C s be cam e across over vehicle,  apoli t ica l/sci encehybr id .

As  one c ommen ta tor explained,
The  Montreal  Pr ot oco lis th e  world ’smos t succe ssful e n vir on m e n ta l treaty, alreadydo i n gdouble d uty sa v in gt he ozone  l aye r an d curbi ng c l im ate chan ge. Wi t hgl obal cl im ate ac ti onnee ded n o w mo re tha n ever,seali n g an HFC dealu nder the Mont r ea l Pr o toco l i s the bigge st t h ingthat ca n b e  done  this  y e ar to build on the Par is  agree mentand protect o ur childre n ’ s  future. 

Wh e nt he planet or c hildr en’s futur e  are thr eaten ed In fa ct, the M o n treal Pr oto col  on lya p pe ared to succe e d . Th is  is bec aus e theyapp lie d t hema jor disto rting as su mp ti on  of  most environm en tal  d isa sterc laims.  A na tura lch a nge  occurs an d it i sex ploi ted  a s anunna t ura l chang e. Most p eop l e th in kthat al l change is g ra dual overlo ngperiod s of timeand variation in nature is almo stnon-e xist ent. From  th is, it  ap p ears l ogical  to c la imt h at an y ch ang eis unnatur a l  an d cau se d by  humans . The ozone, likea llother natural  va riab l e s,  va r ie s  co ns i der a b ly over short t ime period s. 
A  few years ago  I  was su mmonedto ap p ear bef ore the C anadian P ar liam e n tar y Committe e on Ozo ne in Ott a wa. I di d not  wa nt togo  be cause  I kno w  th ese a re orc he strate d cha ra des. The  truth is not the objec tive f or go ver nment oropp o sit ion but s impl y for poli tic ian s topro m ote e ithe r  a  pa r ty or  a p o litical a g en da. I tturned outt h a t i t was  qu a si-jud icia l and I had to ap p ear. A few thi ngsh a ppe ned at t he  hearing thatrel at e to the c ur rent HFC cl aims.

A  d e legat ion fr om Dup ont att e n de d  but r emai ned , to my s urp ri s e, quie t.  I spokewith  s ome of  thema fter . They knew the sc ience w as wr o ng.  Thesi lence w a s be cause they  had a repl acemen t re ady a nd stoo dto mak e m or e money an d  also gai n a P R coup.  A s Du pon t note 

To d a y, Du Pont  m anu facturesh y dr o ch lo r ofl uoro carbo ns  (HC FCs) andh ydrofluo roc a rbons ( HF Cs) a s alte r na t i ves to CFC s f or th e air condit i onin g  a n d ref rigera tion i ndustri e s.
A  York U niv e r sity (
 involves_the agreement_on the reduction of_Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC)._The_Paris Climate_Agreement_is disintegrating for_a variety of_reasons all of them_inherent in the_science_and politics from the start of the AGW deception. Promoters of AGW needed a_victory,_an agreement_that_appeared_to show success in dealing_with the alarmism they created._They had_to show that Protocols, like the Kyoto Protocol_or_its replacement the_Green Climate Fund (GCF), are effective. They reached back_to the Montreal Protocol that they_claim was successful._HFCs_became_a crossover vehicle, a_political/science hybrid.

As one commentator explained,

The Montreal_Protocol is the world’s most successful_environmental treaty, already doing double duty saving_the ozone layer and curbing climate_change. With global climate action_needed now_more than ever, sealing an_HFC deal under_the Montreal_Protocol is the_biggest thing that can be done_this year to_build on the Paris agreement and_protect_our children’s future.

When_the_planet_or children’s_future are threatened_In_fact, the_Montreal_Protocol only appeared to succeed. This_is_because they applied the major distorting assumption_of most environmental disaster_claims._A natural change occurs_and it is exploited as_an unnatural change. Most people think_that all_change is_gradual over long periods of time and variation in nature is_almost non-existent. From this, it appears_logical to claim that_any change_is_unnatural and caused_by_humans. The_ozone, like all other natural variables, varies_considerably over_short time periods.

A few years ago_I was summoned to_appear_before the Canadian Parliamentary Committee on_Ozone in Ottawa. I did not_want to go because I_know_these_are orchestrated charades. The truth_is not the objective for government_or opposition but_simply for politicians to promote either a_party_or a political agenda. It turned_out_that it was quasi-judicial and I_had_to_appear. A few things happened_at the hearing that relate to_the current HFC claims.

A delegation from Dupont attended but_remained, to my_surprise, quiet. I spoke with_some_of_them after. They knew the science was wrong. The silence_was because_they had a_replacement ready and stood to make more money and also_gain a PR coup. As Dupont note

Today,_DuPont manufactures hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) as alternatives to CFCs_for the air conditioning and refrigeration industries.

A York_University (