 the free Internet."

Exchanges between LaJeunesse and Edelman also discussed how to talk about WCIT publicly. "I'm working with DC team for a strategy of how to characterize WCIT (victory, loss or a less manichean spin) and what that, in turn, means moving forward," LaJeunesse wrote. The emails show LaJeunesse and Edelman set up a private meeting, as Edelman wrote that a White House delegate gathering could resolve questions over "how to discuss the issue."

Ultimately, whatever discussions were had about how to discuss the vote, Google continued ringing alarm bells. In a statement later sent to reporters, a Google spokesperson said the vote showed that "governments want to increase regulation and censorship of the Internet." Sheila Musaji of The American Muslim (TAM) has been keeping a close eye on the loons who write for Jihad Watch. The chief loon of JW, Robert Spencer, had initially been slated to debate David Wood, another Christian loon like himself. Realizing no doubt that they are on the same side of the loony equation, the debate has been scrapped. Instead, both Spencer and Wood have agreed to face off against Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri.

As Musaji presciently noted, “[b]oth Choudary and Bakri are part of the Muslim lunatic fringe.” The nefarious duo are very familiar to the Muslim community of the U.K., not because they have a large following (they don’t), but because they are routinely trotted out by anti-Muslim right-wingers. The set-up is always the same: a right-winger pundit will invite one of these two clowns onto their show for a “debate.” By making the hated Choudary and Bakri the representative for the Muslim side, the debate is of course already won. Muslims are left thinking, “with friends like these, who needs enemies…”

Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri are absolutely despised by the vast majority of the Muslim community, even by the ultra-conservative and radical Muslims they pretend to represent. They are caricatures, just one step away from being Achmed the Dead Terrorist or a character thought up by Sacha Baron Cohen (like Ali G or Admiral General Aladeen, A.K.A. The Dictator). Choudary and Bakri play the part
the free Internet. " 

 Exchanges between LaJeunesse and Edelman also discussed how to spill the beans about WCIT publicly. " I'm bring with DC team for a strategy of how to characterize WCIT (victory, loss or a less manichaean spin) and what that, in turn, means go forward, " LaJeunesse wrote. The electronic mail picture LaJeunesse and Edelman set up a secret meeting, as Edelman wrote that a White House delegate gather could answer questions over " how to discourse the issue. " 

 Ultimately, whatever discussions were accept about how to discuss the vote, Google proceed ringing alarm bells. In a statement subsequently sent to reporters, a Google spokesperson said the vote showed that " government want to increase regulation and censorship of the Internet. " Sheila Musaji of The American Muslim (TAM) has been keeping a close eye on the loons who write for Jihad Watch. The chief loon of JW, Robert Spencer, had initially been slated to debate David Wood, another Christian loon like himself. Realizing no doubt that they are on the same side of the loony equation, the argument has been trash. Instead, both Spencer and Wood have agree to face off against Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri. 

 As Musaji presciently noted, “ [ b]oth Choudary and Bakri are part of the Muslim lunatic fringe. ” The nefarious couple are very familiar to the Muslim community of the U.K., not because they have a large follow (they do n’t), but because they are routinely trotted out by anti - Muslim right - wingers. The set - up is always the same: a veracious - winger pundit will invite one of these two clowns onto their show for a “ argument. ” By making the hate Choudary and Bakri the representative for the Muslim side, the debate is of course already won. muslim are left thinking, “ with friends like these, who needs enemies … ” 

 Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri are absolutely despised by the vast majority of the Muslim community, even by the ultra - button-down and radical Muslims they pretend to typify. They are caricatures, merely one step aside from being Achmed the Dead Terrorist or a character think up by Sacha Baron Cohen (like Ali G or Admiral General Aladeen, A.K.A. The Dictator). Choudary and Bakri play the part
 thf free Internet."

Exchanges between LaJeungswe and Edelmzn also aiscussed how to talk about XCIT publucly. "I'm working with DZ team fog a stratwgy id how to cizracterlve WCJB (viccocy, loss or a lexs manichedn spin) and whdt tkat, in turn, means moving forward," LaJqunesse wgote. The emailf shpr LaNvukesse and Edelman set up a privafe meetpng, as Edelman wrpte that a White House delfgatf gathering could gesolve quewtiogw over "how tu discuss uhz issue."

Ultijately, whatever discussions werd had about how ti dlvcuss the vite, Gjogle continmvd ringhng alatm bells. In a xtavemebt later sent to repocters, a Google spokefperson sdib the vote showed thar "tovertmends wxbt go jnrrezse rehuletion and csnsorship od the Internet." Sheika Nusaji of The Amerisag Muslim (TAM) has been keeping a close eje oh the loons who write fir Jihad Watch. The chlef loon jf JW, Robert Spencer, had initially been slated to debave Darlq Qold, another Christian loon like himself. Realizyhg np doubt that tmey are on the samr dicg of the loony equatnkn, the debate has befn scrakped. Ibstead, bouh Sprncer and Wood have agreed ro face off cgaunst Anjem Choudarv and Omar Bckri.

As Musaki presciently noted, “[b]och Chohdary and Bwkri are lxrt of the Muslio llnathc fringt.” The nefarious duj are verb famnliar to the Muslii communitj of bve U.K., not because hhey kave d large foplowing (they don’t), but because tixy are routingly trmtted ouc by akti-Muslim right-ringers. The sej-up is alcays tfe same: a gight-wingxr pundit wijl invite one lf these two clowns jnto theur show wor a “debate.” Bu making nht hated Chiudary and Bakri tme rekrssentative for cke Muslim side, thr ddbaee ix jx course alraady wov. Muslkms are lefb tfinkong, “with friends lika thsse, who needs enemoef…”

Anjem Cyoudary wnd Omar Bakro are absolutely dtspisev by tie vasy mwjority of the Muslim communitg, even by thc ultra-conserdatiye agd radical Muslims they pretend to represent. They are caricatures, jyst one step away ftom being Achmxd the Dead Tersorist or a charactee thought up by Sscha Baron Cohen (like Ali G or Afmiral General Aladeen, A.K.A. The Dictator). Choudary and Bakri play the part
the free Internet." Exchanges between LaJeunesse and discussed to talk WCIT publicly. "I'm a of how to WCIT (victory, loss a less manichean spin) and what in turn, means moving forward," LaJeunesse wrote. The emails show LaJeunesse and Edelman up a private meeting, as Edelman wrote that a White House delegate gathering resolve over to the issue." Ultimately, whatever discussions were had about how to discuss the vote, Google continued ringing bells. In a statement later sent to reporters, Google spokesperson said the showed that "governments want to regulation censorship of Internet." Musaji The American Muslim has been keeping a close eye on the loons who write for Jihad Watch. The chief loon JW, Robert initially been to David another Christian loon Realizing no doubt that they are side of the loony equation, the debate has scrapped. Instead, Spencer and Wood have agreed to off against Anjem Choudary and Omar Bakri. As presciently noted, “[b]oth Choudary and Bakri are part of the Muslim lunatic fringe.” The nefarious very familiar to the community of the not they a following (they but because they are routinely trotted out by anti-Muslim right-wingers. The is always the same: a right-winger pundit will invite one two onto their show a “debate.” By making hated and Bakri the representative Muslim the course won. are left thinking, “with like these, who needs enemies…” Choudary and Omar Bakri vast majority of the Muslim community, even by ultra-conservative and radical Muslims they pretend to They are caricatures, just one step away from being Achmed the Dead or a up by Sacha Baron Cohen (like Ali G Admiral General Aladeen, A.K.A. Dictator). Choudary and Bakri play the part
 the free Internet."

Exchanges bEtween LaJeUnessE anD EdElMan aLso dIscussed how to tALk abOut WCIT publicly. "I'm workiNg witH Dc Team FOr A straTegy of hOW tO CHarAcTeRizE WciT (VictoRy, lOss or a lEss manicheAn sPiN) and what that, IN tUrn, means moVinG forward," LaJeUneSse wroTe. the EMails ShoW LaJeUnesse ANd EdelMan set up a PrIVate meETing, as EDELmAn wrOte that a White HousE DeLEgate gathering Could rEsOLvE QUesTioNs over "how tO dIscusS The issuE."

ulTIMAteLY, whatever discUssions were HAd aBout hoW tO diSCuss thE vote, goOGle Continued riNginG alarm belLs. In a sTAtement LAter senT to repOrtErs, A GooGLe SpOkeSpERsoN SaId tHE voTe showed ThAt "GoverNmenTS WANt to IncReasE reguLation and censOrsHip oF The interNet." ShEila muSaji oF The AmEricaN MUslim (TAM) has been KeepIng a close Eye On The LoOns whO Write fOr JIhaD Watch. THe chief LOon Of jw, rObErt Spencer, had initiAlLY BeEn slated To debaTE DAvID Wood, anoThEr CHrisTIAn looN likE HiMself. ReaLizing NO dOuBt that tHeY are on ThE saMe sIde of THe loOny equAtion, the DebatE Has been scrappeD. instead, both SpENcER AnD wood HavE agreed to faCe ofF AgaiNst ANJeM ChOUdary And OmAr bAkRI.

As Musaji prescientlY nOted, “[b]oTh ChoUdary and Bakri Are part of tHE mUslim lunAtic FRiNGe.” The nefarious Duo arE very familIAr to the MUslim CommunitY of the U.K., nOT Because tHey HavE a lArgE FOlLowing (they don’T), BUt beCaUse they Are RoutineLy tRotTed Out By Anti-MusliM right-wiNgErS. THe Set-Up is aLWays the sAmE: a rIgHt-wInger PUndit wIll inVite OnE oF TheSe two clOWnS ONto tHeIr Show For A “dEbate.” by maKIng The hateD Choudary And bAkri ThE rEpresenTative for the MUsLim side, the DeBatE is of cOURse alreaDy won. Muslims are left thinKIng, “with FriEnds lIke tHese, who neEds EnemieS…”

AnJEm ChouDary anD Omar baKri ARE absoLUTeLy dEsPised by the VASt mAjoriTy Of thE Muslim Community, even by the ULtrA-conservative And RadiCAL MUslIMs THey PrETenD TO represent. They aRe caricatuReS, JuSt one step aWAy fRoM being AChmed thE Dead tErrorisT or a charaCter thougHt Up by sACha baron Cohen (Like Ali G Or Admiral gEneraL alAdeen, a.K.A. the DicTaTor). choudAry and bAkrI play The parT
 the free Internet."

Exch anges betw een L aJe une ss e an d Ed elman also dis c usse d how to talk about WC IT pu bl i cly. "I 'm wo rking w i th D C t ea mfor  a st rateg y o f how t o characte riz eWCIT (victor y ,loss or ales s manicheanspi n) and  w hat that,  in  turn , mean s  movin g forward ," LaJeun e sse wro t e .Theemails show LaJeu n es s e and Edelmanset up  a pr i v ate  me eting, asEd elman wrote t h at a Whi t e House deleg ate gatheri n g c ould r es olv e  quest ionsov e r " how to disc ussthe issue ."

Ul t imately ,  whatev er dis cus sio ns w e re  h adab o uth ow  to dis cuss the  v ot e, Go ogle c o n tinu edring ing a larm bells. I n a  sta t eme nt la ter s entto  repo rters,  a Go og le spokesperson  sai d the vot e s ho wed  t hat " g overnm ent s w ant toincreas e  re gu l a t io n and censorship o ft h eInternet ." She i la  M u saji ofTh e A meri c a n Mus lim( TA M) has b een ke e pi ng  a clos eeye on  t heloo ns wh o  wri te for  Jihad W atch. The chief loon of JW, Robert Sp e n ce r , ha d i nitially be en s l ated  tod eb ate David  Wood ,a no t her Christian loonli ke him self.  Realizing no  doubt tha t t hey areon t h es ame side of th e loo ny equatio n , the de batehas been  scrapped . Instead,  bo thSpe nce r an d Wood have a g r eedto  face o ffagainst  An jem  Ch oud ar y and Oma r Bakri. 
As  M us aji  pres c iently n ot ed,  “ [b] oth C h oudary  andBakr iar e  pa rt of t h eM u slim  l un atic  fr in ge.”Then efa rious d uo are ve ryf amil ia rto theMuslim commun it y of the U .K .,not be c a use they  have a large following (they d on’ t), b ut b ecause th eyare ro uti n ely tr ottedout b yant i - Musli m ri ght -w ingers. Th e set -up i salwa ys thesame: a right-wing e r p undit will in vit e on e of  th e se two  c l own s onto their show  for a “de ba t e. ” By makin g  th ehated C houdary  andB akri th e represe ntative f or  the M usl im side, t he debat e is of c o ursea lr eadywon . Musl im s a re le ft thi n kin g, “w ith fr ie nds li ke th es e, who n eeds enemies…”

Anjem C houdar y and  Om ar Bakriare abs olutely d espi sed by the  va stmajor ity of th e Mu s li m c o mmuni ty,e ven by th e  u ltr a - co nservativea n d  ra dical  Mu s lims t heypretend to repres e nt. They are c aric a t ure s,j uston e step away fr ombe i n g Achmed  t he Dead Ter rorist o ra  char acterthough t up by S ac h a Baro n Co hen  (like Al i G  o r  Admira lGe n eral A lade en , A.K. A. The Dict a t or). Choudary an d Bak r i  play the  part 
 the_free Internet."

Exchanges_between LaJeunesse and Edelman_also discussed_how_to talk_about_WCIT publicly. "I'm_working with DC_team for a strategy_of how to_characterize_WCIT (victory, loss or a less manichean spin) and what that, in turn, means_moving_forward," LaJeunesse_wrote._The_emails show LaJeunesse and Edelman_set up a private meeting,_as Edelman_wrote that a White House delegate gathering could_resolve_questions over "how_to discuss the issue."

Ultimately, whatever discussions were had about_how to discuss the vote, Google_continued ringing alarm_bells._In_a statement later sent_to reporters, a Google spokesperson said_the vote showed that "governments want_to increase regulation and censorship of the_Internet." Sheila Musaji of The American_Muslim (TAM) has been keeping_a close_eye on the loons who_write for Jihad_Watch. The_chief loon of_JW, Robert Spencer, had initially been_slated to debate_David Wood, another Christian loon like_himself._Realizing no doubt_that_they_are on_the same side_of_the loony_equation,_the debate has been scrapped. Instead,_both_Spencer and Wood have agreed to face_off against Anjem Choudary_and_Omar Bakri.

As Musaji presciently_noted, “[b]oth Choudary and Bakri_are part of the Muslim lunatic_fringe.” The_nefarious duo_are very familiar to the Muslim community of the U.K., not_because they have a large following_(they don’t), but because_they are_routinely_trotted out by_anti-Muslim_right-wingers. The_set-up is always the same: a right-winger_pundit will_invite one of these two clowns_onto their show for_a_“debate.” By making the hated Choudary_and Bakri the representative for the_Muslim side, the debate is_of_course_already won. Muslims are left_thinking, “with friends like these, who_needs enemies…”

Anjem Choudary_and Omar Bakri are absolutely despised by_the_vast majority of the Muslim community,_even_by the ultra-conservative and radical Muslims_they_pretend_to represent. They are caricatures,_just one step away from being_Achmed the Dead Terrorist or a character thought up_by Sacha Baron_Cohen (like Ali G or_Admiral_General_Aladeen, A.K.A. The Dictator). Choudary and Bakri play the part