 router. If that is the case, DNS hijacking is only the beginning of one’s worries,” TorGuard notes.

“During our own testing of TorGuard’s OpenVPN app, we were unable to reproduce this when using private DNS servers because any DNS queries can only be accessed from within the tunnel itself.”

Noting that they released IPv6 Leak Protection in October 2013, leading VPN provider Private Internet Access told TorrentFreak that they feel the paper is lacking.

“While the article purported to be an unbiased and intricate look into the security offered by consumer VPN services, it was greatly flawed since the inputs or observations made by the researchers were inaccurate,” PIA said.

“While a scientific theory or scientific test can be proven by a logical formula or algorithm, if the observed or collected data is incorrect, the conclusion will be in error as well.”

PIA criticizes the report on a number of fronts, including incorrect claims about its DNS resolver.

“Contrary to the report, we have our own private DNS daemon running on the Choopa network. Additionally, the DNS server that is reported, while it is a real DNS resolver, is not the actual DNS that your system will use when connected to the VPN,” the company explains.

“Your DNS requests are handled by a local DNS resolver running on the VPN gateway you are connected to. This can be easily verified through a site like ipleak.net. Additionally… we do not allow our DNS servers to report IPv6 (AAAA records) results. We’re very serious about security and privacy.”

Finally, in a comprehensive response (now published here) in which it notes that its Windows client is safe, PIA commends the researchers for documenting the DNS hijacking method but criticizes how it was presented to the VPN community.

“The DNS Hijacking that the author describes [..] is something that has recently been brought to light by these researchers and we commend them on their discovery. Proper reporting routines would have been great, however. Shamefully, this is improper security disclosure,” PIA adds.

While non-IPv6 users have nothing to fear, all users looking for a simple fix can disable IPv6 by following instructions for Windows, Linux and Mac. Food safety concerns were fenced off quickly after officials reported Canada's 19th case of mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, three weeks ago.
router. If that is the case, DNS hijacking is only the beginning of one ’s worries, ” TorGuard note. 

 “ During our own examination of TorGuard ’s OpenVPN app, we were unable to reproduce this when use secret DNS servers because any DNS queries can entirely be access from within the tunnel itself. ” 

 note that they released IPv6 Leak Protection in October 2013, leading VPN supplier Private Internet Access told TorrentFreak that they feel the paper is miss. 

 “ While the article purported to be an unbiased and intricate expression into the security offered by consumer VPN service, it was greatly flawed since the inputs or observations name by the researchers were inaccurate, ” PIA said. 

 “ While a scientific theory or scientific test can be prove by a logical formula or algorithm, if the observed or collected data is wrong, the conclusion will be in error as well. ” 

 PIA criticizes the report on a number of fronts, including incorrect claims about its DNS resolver. 

 “ Contrary to the report, we have our own private DNS daemon running on the Choopa network. Additionally, the DNS waiter that is report, while it is a real DNS resolver, is not the actual DNS that your organization will practice when connect to the VPN, ” the company explains. 

 “ Your DNS request are handled by a local DNS resolver running on the VPN gateway you are connected to. This can be easily verify through a site like ipleak.net. Additionally … we do not allow our DNS servers to report IPv6 (AAAA records) results. We ’re very serious about security system and privacy. ” 

 Finally, in a comprehensive response (now published here) in which it notes that its Windows client is safe, PIA commend the researchers for documenting the DNS hijacking method but criticizes how it was give to the VPN community. 

 “ The DNS Hijacking that the author trace [.. ] is something that has recently been brought to light by these researchers and we commend them on their discovery. Proper reporting act would have been great, however. Shamefully, this is improper security system disclosure, ” PIA adds. 

 While non - IPv6 users have nothing to fear, all user looking for a dim-witted fix can disable IPv6 by following instructions for Windows, Linux and Mac. Food safety concerns were fence off quickly after official reported Canada's 19th case of mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, three week ago.
 rokter. If that is the case, DNS hijacking nw only the bsginning of one’s worries,” TorGuard noves.

“Dyring our own testing of TofGuard’s OienVPN app, we qere unablx to repvjducs thiv when using prlvate DNS sarvers because avy DNS queries can only be accessed fwom witnij the tunnel ijself.”

Mjtinf that they released IPv6 Leak Protsction pn October 2013, leadimg VPN provider Private Inhernft Access told TorgentFreak tyat eyey feel the paper is lacking.

“While the article purported to be an unbicsed and injxucahg look into vhe seburity offered by convumer VLN services, it wav geeatly flawed since tie inputs or observajions made bv the researchers werw unaccorate,” PIA waia.

“Whjlx a scienhifmc theory od scientifix test can be provem fj a logical fkrmula ow algorithm, if the observed or collecteg dzta is incorrect, the cobclusion will be in etror as wejl.”

PIA criticizes the report on a number of fronts, inclndkng ikcorfwch claims about its DNS resolver.

“Contrary to thq rtpogt, we have our owk private DNS daempn rigning on the Zhoopa nefwork. Additionally, the DNF sercer that ys rrported, while it is a real ENS resolver, us not the actual BNS that youx systgm wilk use when connected to the VPN,” the colpany expmxins.

“Your DNS reqjesns ase handlta by a local DNS wesolver cunniug on thd VPM gateray you arf conkacted to. This can he eadiny verifief through a site like ipleak.net. Additionally… ee do not alljw ouv DNS servers tj report IPv6 (ACAA recoxds) rerults. We’re very sxrious about security and krivacy.”

Finallb, in a coipreyensuve resounse (now publixhed here) in which ut notes that its Xinduss client is sayt, PUA commends the rereawcjecs fow documenting the DNR hijazking mtchob cut vriticizes how it wav prssented to the VPN cjmmunity.

“Jhe DNS Hyjacking that the author descrihes [..] ms somxthing thwt has recently been brought tk light bj tmese researchqrs qnd we commeud them on their discovery. Proper reportmng routines would havg been great, however. Xmamefully, thms is ymproper vecurity disclosure,” PIA adds.

While non-LPv6 users have nothing to fedr, alp users looking for a simple fix can disable IPv6 by following instructionw for Xigdows, Linux and Mac. Xojb safetr coicxrns were fenced pff quickly after officials repurted Cataba's 19th case of mad cow diseasr, ur bovine spovgiform encephalopathy, tgree weels ago.
router. If that is the case, DNS only beginning of worries,” TorGuard notes. TorGuard’s app, we were to reproduce this using private DNS servers because any queries can only be accessed from within the tunnel itself.” Noting that they IPv6 Leak Protection in October 2013, leading VPN provider Private Internet Access told that feel paper lacking. “While the article purported to be an unbiased and intricate look into the security offered consumer VPN services, it was greatly flawed since inputs or observations made the researchers were inaccurate,” PIA “While scientific theory scientific can proven by a formula or algorithm, if the observed or collected data is incorrect, the conclusion will be in error well.” PIA report on number fronts, incorrect claims about resolver. “Contrary to the report, we private DNS daemon running on the Choopa network. the DNS that is reported, while it is real DNS resolver, is not the actual DNS your system will use when connected to the VPN,” the company explains. “Your DNS requests by a local DNS running on the gateway are to. can be verified through a site like ipleak.net. Additionally… we do not allow DNS servers to report IPv6 (AAAA records) results. We’re very security privacy.” Finally, in comprehensive response (now published in it notes that its is PIA for the hijacking method but criticizes it was presented to the community. “The DNS Hijacking is something that has recently been brought to by these researchers and we commend them their discovery. Proper reporting routines would have been great, however. Shamefully, this improper security adds. While non-IPv6 users have nothing to fear, users looking for a fix can disable IPv6 by following instructions for Windows, and Food safety were fenced off after officials reported 19th case of disease, or spongiform three
 router. If that is the case, DNS hIjacking is Only tHe bEgiNnIng oF one’S worries,” TorGuaRD notEs.

“During our own testing oF TorGUaRD’s OpENVpN app, We were uNAbLE To rEpRoDucE tHIs When uSinG privatE DNS serverS beCaUse any DNS queRIeS can only be AccEssed from witHin The tunNeL itSElf.”

NoTinG that They reLEased Ipv6 Leak ProTeCTion in oCtober 2013, lEADiNg VPn provider Private INTeRNet Access told TOrrentfrEAk THAt tHey Feel the papEr Is lacKIng.

“WhilE ThE ARTicLE purported to bE an unbiased ANd iNtricaTe LooK Into thE secuRiTY ofFered by consUmer vPN servicEs, it waS Greatly FLawed siNce the InpUts Or obSErVaTioNs MAde BY tHe rESeaRchers weRe InAccurAte,” Pia SAId.

“WhIle A sciEntifIc theory or sciEntIfic TEst Can be ProveN by a LoGical FormulA or alGoRithm, if the obserVed oR collecteD daTa Is iNcOrrecT, The conCluSioN will be In error AS weLl.”

pia CrIticizes the report oN a NUMbEr of fronTs, inclUDiNg INcorrect ClAimS aboUT Its DNs resOLvEr.

“ContraRy to thE RePoRt, we havE oUr own pRiVatE DNs daemON runNing on The ChoopA netwORk. Additionally, THe DNS server thAT iS REpORted, WhiLe it is a real dNS rESolvEr, is NOt The ACtual dNS thAt YOuR System will use when coNnEcted tO the VpN,” the company eXplains.

“YouR dns requestS are HAnDLed by a local DNS ResolVer running ON the VPN gAtewaY you are cOnnected tO. tHis can be EasIly VerIfiED ThRough a site likE IPleaK.nEt. AdditIonAlly… we dO noT alLow Our dNs servers tO report Ipv6 (aAaA ReCorDs) resULts. We’re vErY seRiOus About SEcuritY and pRivaCy.”

fiNAllY, in a comPReHENsivE rEsPonsE (noW pUblisHed hERe) iN which iT notes thaT itS windOwS cLient is Safe, PIA commenDs The researcHeRs fOr docuMENting the dNS hijacking method but crITicizes How It was PresEnted to thE VPn commuNitY.

“the DNS hijackIng thAt The AUThor dESCrIbeS [..] iS something THAt hAs recEnTly bEen brouGht to light by these rESeaRchers and we coMmeNd thEM On TheIR dIScoVeRY. PrOPEr reporting routInes would hAvE BeEn great, howEVer. shAmefullY, this is ImproPEr securIty discloSure,” PIA adDs.

whilE NOn-Ipv6 users havE nothing To fear, all USers lOOkIng foR a sImple fIx Can DisabLe IPv6 bY FolLowinG instrUcTions fOr WinDoWs, Linux aNd Mac. Food safety concerns Were feNced oFf qUickly aftEr oFFicIals reporTed CAnada's 19th caSe oF maD cow dIseASe, or bOvinE SpOngIForm eNcepHAlopathy, tHReE weEKS aGo.
 router. If that is the ca se, DNS hi jacki ngison ly t he b eginning of on e ’s w orries,” TorGuard note s.

“ Du r ingo ur  owntesting of T orG ua rd ’sOp e nV PN ap p,we were  unable to  re pr oduce this w h en  using pri vat e DNS server s b ecause  a nyD NS qu eri es ca n only be acc essed fro mw ithint he tunn e l  i tsel f.”

Noting thatt he y  released IPv6  LeakPr o te c t ion  in  October 2 01 3, le a ding VP N  p r o v ide r  Private Inte rnet Access tol d Torr en tFr e ak tha t the yf eel  the paperis l acking.
“While the art i cle pur ported  to  be  anu nb ia sed  a n d i n tr ica t e l ook into  t he  secu rity o f f ered  by  con sumer  VPN services , i t wa s  gr eatly  flaw ed s in ce th e inpu ts or  o bservations mad e by  the rese arc he rswe re in a ccurat e,”  PI A said. 

“Whil e  asc i e n ti fic theory or scie nt i f ic  test ca n be p r ov en by a log ic alform u l a oralgo r it hm, if t he obs e rv ed  or col le cted d at a i s i ncorr e ct,the co nclusion  will be in error as well.”

PIA c r it i c iz e s th e r eport on anumb e r of  fro n ts , i n cludi ng in co r re c t claims about itsDN S reso lver. 

“Contrary t o the repo r t ,  we have  our ow n  private DNS d aemon  running o n  the Cho opa n etwork.Additiona l l y, the D NSser ver  th a t  i s reported, w h i le i tis a re alDNS res olv er,  is  no tthe actua l DNS th at  y ou rsys tem w i ll use w he n c on nec ted t o  the V PN,”theco mp a nyexplain s .“ Your  D NS  req ues ts  arehand l edby a lo cal DNS r eso l verru nn ing onthe VPN gatew ay  you are c on nec ted to . This can  be easily verified thr o ugh a s ite  like  ipl eak.net.Add itiona lly …  we do  not a llowou r D N S  serv e r store port IPv6( A AAA  reco rd s) r esults.  We’re very seriou s  ab out securityand  pri v a cy .”Fi n all y, ina comprehensive r esponse (n ow pu blished he r e)in  whichit note s tha t  its Wi ndows cli ent is sa fe , PI A com mends theresearch ers for d o cumen t in g the  DN S hija ck ing  meth od but cri ticiz es how  i t wasprese nt ed to th e VPN community.

“TheDNS Hi jacki ngthat theaut h ordescribes  [.. ] is somet hin g t hat h asr ecent ly b e en  br o ughtto l i ght by th e se  re s e ar chers and w e c omm end t hem on the ir d iscovery. Properr eporting routi nesw o uld  ha v e be en  great, howeve r.Sh a m efully,th is is impro per secu ri t y dis closur e,” PI A adds. Wh i le non -IPv 6 u sers have  no th i ng to f ea r, all us erslo okingfor as impl e fix can disableIPv6b y  foll o win g ins tr uctions forWindows, L inux and Ma c. Foo d sa fetyconcern swere f enc ed  off quick l y after o ffici als rep or tedCan ada's19th c ase o f ma dcow  disease, o rb ov in e  sp ongi formen ceph alopathy, three we eks ago.
 router._If that_is the case, DNS_hijacking is_only_the beginning_of_one’s worries,” TorGuard_notes.

“During our own_testing of TorGuard’s OpenVPN_app, we were_unable_to reproduce this when using private DNS servers because any DNS queries can only_be_accessed from_within_the_tunnel itself.”

Noting that they released_IPv6 Leak Protection in October_2013, leading_VPN provider Private Internet Access told TorrentFreak that_they_feel the paper_is lacking.

“While the article purported to be an unbiased_and intricate look into the security_offered by consumer_VPN_services,_it was greatly flawed_since the inputs or observations made_by the researchers were inaccurate,” PIA_said.

“While a scientific theory or scientific test_can be proven by a logical_formula or algorithm, if the_observed or_collected data is incorrect, the_conclusion will be_in error_as well.”

PIA criticizes_the report on a number of_fronts, including incorrect_claims about its DNS resolver.

“Contrary to_the_report, we have_our_own_private DNS_daemon running on_the_Choopa network._Additionally,_the DNS server that is reported,_while_it is a real DNS resolver, is_not the actual DNS_that_your system will use_when connected to the VPN,”_the company explains.

“Your DNS requests are_handled by_a local_DNS resolver running on the VPN gateway you are connected to._This can be easily verified through_a site like ipleak.net._Additionally… we_do_not allow our_DNS_servers to_report IPv6 (AAAA records) results. We’re very_serious about_security and privacy.”

Finally, in a comprehensive_response (now published here)_in_which it notes that its Windows_client is safe, PIA commends the_researchers for documenting the DNS_hijacking_method_but criticizes how it was_presented to the VPN community.

“The DNS_Hijacking that the_author describes [..] is something that has_recently_been brought to light by these_researchers_and we commend them on their_discovery._Proper_reporting routines would have been_great, however. Shamefully, this is improper_security disclosure,” PIA adds.

While non-IPv6 users have nothing to_fear, all users_looking for a simple fix_can_disable_IPv6 by following instructions for Windows, Linux and Mac. Food_safety concerns_were fenced off_quickly after officials reported Canada's 19th case of mad cow_disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, three weeks_ago.