Syrian conflict participating, as achieving political solution "clearly requires the participation of the regime and the support of their allies."

READ MORE: Syrian people should decide Assad’s fate, Tillerson tells US media

"It is through that political process that we believe the Syrian people will ultimately be able to decide the fate of Bashar Assad," he said, stressing that the US has learned its lesson from aversive effects of a “violent regime change” in Libya.

"Obviously the United States' own founding principle is self-determination, and what the US and our allies want to do is to enable the Syrian people to make that determination,” he said, adding that the US’ man focus in Syria is defeating Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS,ISIL).

However, this time two of the most senior diplomats in the Trump administration appeared to send mixed signals, as Haley kept insisting that there are no viable political options with Assad in power.

“We know that there is not any sort of option were a political solution is going to happen with Assad at the head of the regime,” she told CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ responding to the question if the regime change in Syria can be considered now the official stance of the US.

Tillerson: Take out ISIS, maybe not Assad.



McMaster: Take out ISIS & Assad simultaneously.



Haley: Regime change will happen.



Confused? — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) April 9, 2017

Trump’s flip-flopping lead was followed by senior Republican lawmakers, including Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) While both lawmakers, like Trump, opposed the military action in Syria when it was mulled by Obama, with Ryan arguing in 2013 that such an “ill-conceived” decision would make US “look weak,” they hailed Trump for effectively doing just that.

“This was a strike that was well-planned, well-executed, went right to the heart of the matter, which is using chemical weapons,” McConnell said on Friday, and Ryan claimed that the attack “make it clear” that the Syrian government “can no longer count on American inaction.”

POLL of Trump supporters: Do you support @realDonaldTrump's new policy demanding regime change in Syria? — NotRicky Vaughn🌹 (@RickyVaughnX1)
Syrian conflict participating, as achieving political solution " clearly requires the engagement of the government and the support of their allies. " 

 understand MORE: Syrian multitude should decide Assad ’s fate, Tillerson tells US medium 

 " It is through that political process that we believe the Syrian citizenry will ultimately be able to decide the fate of Bashar Assad, " he said, try that the US has learned its lesson from aversive effect of a “ violent government change ” in Libya. 

 " Obviously the United States' own founding rationale is self - determination, and what the US and our allies want to perform is to enable the Syrian people to make that decision, ” he said, add that the US ’ man focus in Syria is defeating Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS, ISIL). 

 However, this time two of the about senior diplomats in the Trump administration appeared to send mixed signal, as Haley kept insisting that there are no viable political options with Assad in power. 

 “ We know that there is not any sort of option were a political solution is go to happen with Assad at the head of the regimen, ” she tell CNN ’s ‘ State of the Union ’ responding to the question if the government change in Syria can be considered now the official stance of the US. 

 Tillerson: drive out ISIS, maybe not Assad. 



 McMaster: Take out ISIS & Assad simultaneously. 



 Haley: Regime change will happen. 



 Confused? — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) April 9, 2017 

 Trump ’s flip - flop lead was followed by senior Republican lawmakers, include Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R - Ky) and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R - Wis.) While both lawgiver, like Trump, oppose the military action in Syria when it was mulled by Obama, with Ryan arguing in 2013 that such an “ ill - conceived ” decision would make US “ look fallible, ” they hailed Trump for effectively doing just that. 

 “ This was a hit that was well - planned, well - perform, went right to the center of the matter, which is use chemical weapons, ” McConnell say on Friday, and Ryan claimed that the fire “ make it clear ” that the Syrian politics “ can no longer count on American inaction. ” 

 POLL of Trump supporters: Do you support @realDonaldTrump's new policy demanding regime change in Syria? — NotRicky Vaughn 🌹 (@RickyVaughnX1 )
Syrlan conflict participatikg, as achieving kooitican solufion "clexrly requires the participatmon if tht regime and the suoport of nheir allues."

RTAD MORE: Syrian pxkple should dsgide Cswad’s fate, Tillgrson tells GS media

"It is dhfobgh that political process that we bqlieve yhf Syrian peoplg wilk ultjmately be able to decide the fate of Basiar Assad," he saod, stressing that the US hws lfarned its lesson vrom aversice esdects of a “vkolent regpke change” jn Libya.

"Obviously the United Stxtes' pwn foundibg prltciple is sxlf-detvrmination, and what tve US amd our allies eanv to do is to enable the Vyrian people to mwke that gecermination,” he said, aedung tvat dhe JW’ mxn rorus in Sygia is defeatjng Islamic State (IS, formerly OSYW,ISIL).

However, fhis tymq two of the most senior diplomats in tve Frump administration appeared to send mixed dignals, af Haley kept insisting that there are no viable pmlitirau oktljvw aith Assad in power.

“We know that there is not why sprt of option cere a political sllijion is going jo happzh sith Assad at the jead of the eegime,” sht tolc CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ rwsponding to rhe question if thz regime chauge in Syris can be considered now the official shance of ffe US.

Tillerson: Txke ogt ISIS, maybe not Assad.



McMwster: Takx out ISIS & Xssac simujtaneously.



Jaley: Regime change will happgn.



Confgsed? — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) Aprmk 9, 2017

Trump’s flop-xloiping leab was nollowed by senyor Republican lawmakzrs, inzluding Sehate Re'ublican leaqer Mitch McCmjnell (R-Ky) anv House S[eakwr Pqul Ryav (R-Wis.) While boyh lawmakvrf, lije Trump, opposed tme miujtary action in Sytua when it was muuleq hy Ofdma, with Ryat areuivb in 2013 that such cn “ill-vonceived” decision wmuld make US “look weak,” tmey hailee Trump sor effectiveky doing just that.

“Uhis wes a svrike yhaj was well-planned, well-executed, sent righh tj the heart jf tme mwtter, whick is using chemical weapons,” McConnell samd on Friday, and Ryan coaimed that the attccl “make it ckear” ehat the Vyrian government “cab no longer count on American inaction.”

LOLL ox Trulp supporters: Do you support @realDonaldTrump's new policy demanding regime changx yn Syria? — NktRivky Vduyhn🌹 (@RickyDauginE1)
Syrian conflict participating, as achieving political solution the of the and the support Syrian should decide Assad’s Tillerson tells US "It is through that political process we believe the Syrian people will ultimately be able to decide the fate Bashar Assad," he said, stressing that the US has learned its lesson from effects a regime in Libya. "Obviously the United States' own founding principle is self-determination, and what the US and allies want to do is to enable the people to make that he said, adding that the man in Syria defeating State formerly ISIS,ISIL). However, time two of the most senior diplomats in the Trump administration appeared to send mixed signals, as kept insisting are no political with in power. “We there is not any sort of political solution is going to happen with Assad the head the regime,” she told CNN’s ‘State the Union’ responding to the question if the change in Syria can be considered now the official stance of the US. Tillerson: Take maybe not Assad. McMaster: out ISIS & simultaneously. Regime will Confused? — Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) April 9, 2017 Trump’s flip-flopping lead was followed senior Republican lawmakers, including Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) Speaker Ryan (R-Wis.) While lawmakers, like Trump, opposed military in Syria when it by with 2013 such “ill-conceived” decision would make “look weak,” they hailed Trump effectively doing just that. was well-planned, well-executed, went right to the heart the matter, which is using chemical weapons,” said on Friday, and Ryan claimed that the attack “make it clear” the Syrian no longer count on American inaction.” POLL of supporters: Do you support new policy demanding regime change in Syria? — NotRicky (@RickyVaughnX1)
Syrian conflict participatiNg, as achievIng poLitIcaL sOlutIon "cLearly requires THe paRticipation of the regime And thE sUPporT Of Their Allies."

ReaD morE: SYrIaN peOpLE sHould DecIde AssaD’s fate, TillErsOn Tells US media

"iT iS through thAt pOlitical procEss That we BeLieVE the SYriAn peoPle wilL UltimaTely be ablE tO Decide THe fate oF bAsHar ASsad," he said, stressiNG tHAt the US has learNed its LeSSoN FRom AveRsive effecTs Of a “viOLent regIMe CHANge” IN Libya.

"ObviousLy the United sTatEs' own fOuNdiNG princIple iS sELf-dEterminatioN, and What the US And our ALlies waNT to do is To enabLe tHe SYriaN PeOpLe tO mAKe tHAt DetERmiNation,” he SaId, AddinG thaT THE uS’ maN foCus iN SyriA is defeating ISlaMic STAte (iS, forMerly iSIS,iSiL).

HowEver, thIs timE tWo of the most seniOr diPlomats in The trUmp AdMinisTRation AppEarEd to senD mixed sIGnaLs, AS hAlEy kept insisting thaT tHERe Are no viaBle polITiCaL Options wItH AsSad iN POwer.

“WE knoW ThAt there iS not anY SoRt Of optioN wEre a poLiTicAl sOlutiON is gOing to Happen wiTh AssAD at the head of thE Regime,” she told cnN’S ‘sTaTE of tHe UNion’ respondIng tO The qUestIOn If tHE regiMe chaNgE In sYria can be considered NoW the ofFiciaL stance of the Us.

Tillerson: tAKE out ISIS, MaybE NoT assad.



McMaster: TAke ouT ISIS & Assad SImultaneOusly.



haley: RegIme change WILl happen.



conFusEd? — PAul jOSePh Watson (@PrisoNpLaneT) APril 9, 2017

TruMp’s Flip-floPpiNg lEad Was FoLlowed by sEnior RepUbLiCaN lAwmAkers, INcluding seNatE REpuBlicaN Leader mitch mcCoNnElL (r-Ky) And HousE spEAKer PAuL RYan (R-wis.) whIle boTh laWMakErs, like trump, oppoSed THe miLiTaRy actioN in Syria when iT wAs mulled by obAma, With RyAN Arguing iN 2013 that such an “ill-conceived” DEcision WouLd makE US “lOok weak,” thEy hAiled TRumP For effEctiveLy doiNg JusT THat.

“ThIS WaS a sTrIke that was WELl-pLanneD, wEll-eXecuted, Went right to the hearT Of tHe matter, which Is uSing CHEmIcaL WeAPonS,” MCconNELl said on Friday, aNd Ryan claiMeD ThAt the attacK “MakE iT clear” tHat the SYrian GOvernmeNt “can no loNger count On amerICAn iNaction.”

POLl of Trump SupporterS: do you SUpPort @rEaldonaldtrUmp'S new pOlicy dEManDing rEgime cHaNge in SYria? — NOtricky VauGhn🌹 (@RickyVaughnX1)
Syrian conflict participat ing, as ac hievi ngpol it ical  sol ution "clearly requ ires the participation  of t he regi m eand t he supp o rt o f t he ir  al li e s. "

RE ADMORE: S yrian peop lesh ould decideA ss ad’s fate,  Ti llerson tell s U S medi a
"I t  is t hro ugh t hat po l itical  processth a t we b e lieve t h e  S yria n people will ult i ma t ely be able to  decid et he f ate  of  Bashar As sa d," h e  said,s tr e s s ing that the US h as learnedi tslesson  f rom aversi ve ef fe c tsof a “viole nt r egime cha nge” i n  Libya. 
"Obvio usly t heUni tedS ta te s'ow n  fo u nd ing pri nciple i sse lf-de term i n a t ion,  an d wh at th e US and ourall iesw ant  to d o isto e na ble t he Syr ian p eo ple to make tha t de terminati on, ”hesa id, a d ding t hat  th e US’ m an focu s  in  S y r i ais defeating Islam ic S ta te (IS,former l yIS I S,ISIL). 
How ever , thistime tw o of the  mosts en io r diplo ma ts inth e T rum p adm i nist ration  appeare d tos end mixed sign a ls, as Haleyk ep t in s isti ngthat therearen o vi able po lit i cal o ption sw it h  Assad in power.

“ We  knowthatthere is notany sort o f o ption we re a po l itical solutio n isgoing to h a ppen wit h Ass ad at th e head of t he regim e,”  sh e t old C NN ’s ‘State oft h e Un io n’ resp ond ing tothe  qu est ion  i f the reg ime chan ge  i nSy ria  canb e consid er edno w t he of f icialstanc e of  t he US. 

Tille r so n :  Tak eou t IS IS,  m aybenotA ssa d.



M cMaster:Tak e  out  I SI S & Ass ad simultaneo us ly.



Hal ey : R egimec h ange wil l happen.



Confused?—  Paul J ose ph Wa tson  (@Prison Pla net) A pri l  9, 20 17

Tr ump’s  f lip - f loppi n g  l ead  w as followe d bysenio rRepu blicanlawmakers, includi n g S enate Republi can  lea d e rMit c hM cCo nn e ll( R -Ky) and HouseSpeaker Pa ul Ry an (R-Wis. )  Wh il e bothlawmake rs, l i ke Trum p, oppose d the mil it arya c tio n in Syria  when it  was mull e d byO ba ma, w ith  Ryanar gui ng in  2013t hat  such  an “i ll -conce ived”  d ecisionwould make US “look wea k,” th ey ha ile d Trump f ore ffe ctively d oing  just that .
“Th is wa s a strik e th a twas well- plan n ed, well- e xe cut e d ,went rightt o the  hear t o f  the m atte r, which is using chemical weapo ns,” M cCo nne l l sa id  on Friday, an d R ya n claimedth at the atta ck “make  i t  clea r” tha t theSyriang o ve r nment“can  no  longer c oun to n Ameri ca ni nactio n.”
P OLL of  Trump supp o r ters: Do you sup port@ r ealDo n ald Trump 's  new po l icydemandingregime chan ge inSyri a? —NotRick yVaughn 🌹 ( @R ickyVaughn X 1)
Syrian conflict_participating, as_achieving political solution "clearly_requires the_participation_of the_regime_and the support_of their allies."

READ_MORE: Syrian people should_decide Assad’s fate,_Tillerson_tells US media

"It is through that political process that we believe the Syrian people_will_ultimately be_able_to_decide the fate of Bashar_Assad," he said, stressing that_the US_has learned its lesson from aversive effects of_a_“violent regime change”_in Libya.

"Obviously the United States' own founding principle is_self-determination, and what the US and_our allies want_to_do_is to enable the_Syrian people to make that determination,”_he said, adding that the US’_man focus in Syria is defeating Islamic_State (IS, formerly ISIS,ISIL).

However, this time_two of the most senior_diplomats in_the Trump administration appeared to_send mixed signals,_as Haley_kept insisting that_there are no viable political options_with Assad in_power.

“We know that there is not_any_sort of option_were_a_political solution_is going to_happen_with Assad_at_the head of the regime,” she_told_CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ responding to_the question if the_regime_change in Syria can_be considered now the official_stance of the US.

Tillerson: Take out_ISIS, maybe_not Assad.



McMaster:_Take out ISIS & Assad simultaneously.



Haley: Regime change will happen.



Confused? —_Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) April 9,_2017

Trump’s flip-flopping lead was_followed by_senior_Republican lawmakers, including_Senate_Republican leader_Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and House Speaker Paul_Ryan (R-Wis.)_While both lawmakers, like Trump, opposed_the military action in_Syria_when it was mulled by Obama,_with Ryan arguing in 2013 that_such an “ill-conceived” decision would_make_US_“look weak,” they hailed Trump_for effectively doing just that.

“This was_a strike that_was well-planned, well-executed, went right to the_heart_of the matter, which is using_chemical_weapons,” McConnell said on Friday, and_Ryan_claimed_that the attack “make it_clear” that the Syrian government “can_no longer count on American inaction.”

POLL of Trump supporters:_Do you support_@realDonaldTrump's new policy demanding regime_change_in_Syria? — NotRicky Vaughn🌹 (@RickyVaughnX1)