 use of presently existing mental health tests of purposes of the proposed bill, wouldn’t those tests still need required scrutiny to ascertain their applicability to firearms ownership and possession? Thirteenth, who would be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of these new mental evaluative test records and, would the individual’s personal physician or mental health practitioner have access to them? Would the person being evaluated be able to obtain a copy of or at least be able to view his or her mental health evaluation records? If not, why not?

, who would be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of these new mental evaluative test records and, would the individual’s personal physician or mental health practitioner have access to them? Would the person being evaluated be able to obtain a copy of or at least be able to view his or her mental health evaluation records? If not, why not? Fourteenth, what recourse would examinees have whose confidentiality is violated? Would examinees even know whether the records of their mental health evaluation had been misused, misplaced, hacked into, lost, stolen, or wrongly distributed or disseminated to individuals, Government agencies, private entities, academia, or the CDC, contrary to law or procedure? Would the New York State Government have a legal duty to inform the examinee of such loss or misallocation of sensitive, confidential, personal records? Would the examinee have legal recourse to obtain damages?

, what recourse would examinees have whose confidentiality is violated? Would examinees even know whether the records of their mental health evaluation had been misused, misplaced, hacked into, lost, stolen, or wrongly distributed or disseminated to individuals, Government agencies, private entities, academia, or the CDC, contrary to law or procedure? Would the New York State Government have a legal duty to inform the examinee of such loss or misallocation of sensitive, confidential, personal records? Would the examinee have legal recourse to obtain damages? Fifteenth, on what grounds might one appeal an adverse result, and what would be the costs of de novo review? And who would be required to bear those costs?

, on what grounds might one appeal an adverse result, and what would be the costs of de novo review? And who would be required to bear those costs? Sixteenth, what is the time frame between setting up an evaluation process and obtaining the results of an evaluation?

, what is the time frame between setting up an evaluation process and obtaining the results of an evaluation? Seventeenth, can the mental
use of presently existing mental health examination of determination of the proposed bill, would n’t those tests even need required examination to ascertain their applicability to firearms ownership and monomania? Thirteenth, who would be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of these modern mental evaluative examination record and, would the individual ’s personal physician or mental health practitioner have access to them? Would the person being measure be able to obtain a copy of or at least be able to view his or her genial health evaluation records? If not, why not? 

, who would be responsible for maintain the confidentiality of these raw mental appraising test records and, would the individual ’s personal physician or genial health practitioner have access to them? Would the person being evaluated be able to obtain a copy of or at least be able to view his or her mental health evaluation records? If not, why not? Fourteenth, what recourse would examinees have whose confidentiality is violated? Would examinees even know whether the records of their mental health evaluation had been misused, misplaced, chop into, lost, stolen, or incorrectly distribute or disseminated to individuals, Government agency, individual entities, academia, or the CDC, contrary to jurisprudence or procedure? Would the New York State Government have a legal duty to inform the examinee of such loss or misallocation of sensitive, confidential, personal records? Would the testee have legal recourse to obtain damages? 

, what recourse would examinees have whose confidentiality is violated? Would examinees even acknowledge whether the records of their mental health evaluation had been misused, misplaced, hacked into, baffled, stolen, or wrongly distributed or circulate to individuals, politics agencies, private entities, academia, or the CDC, contrary to law or routine? Would the New York State Government have a legal duty to inform the examinee of such personnel casualty or misallocation of sensitive, confidential, personal record? Would the examinee suffer legal recourse to obtain damage? Fifteenth, on what grounds might one appeal an adverse resultant role, and what would be the cost of de novo review? And who would be required to digest those costs? 

, on what grounds might one appeal an adverse result, and what would be the costs of de novo review? And who would be necessitate to bear those costs? Sixteenth, what is the prison term frame between setting up an evaluation summons and obtaining the results of an evaluation? 

, what is the time frame of reference between setting up an evaluation process and obtaining the results of an evaluation? Seventeenth, can the mental
 usf of presently existing oental health tgsrs of 'urposea of the proposed bill, wouldn’t those twsts wtill need required scfutiny to ascertaun tieir applicabilivg to fivzarms lwnexsiip and possesslon? Thirteetth, who would te rzsponsible for maintaining the confiqentialotj of these new menual evamlauive test records and, would the ihdividuel’s personal phusician or mental health pgactltioner have accesd to them? Wiuld rhe person bding evaluated be able to obtain a copy of or at leasg be cble to vieq yis mr her mentel heajth evaluation recorgs? If npt, why not?

, who wonld ve responsible for mamntaining the confidgntiality mf these new mental ecaluajive dest eecurda end, would thx individuam’s personal physician or mentak rvslth practitjoner rade access to them? Would the person beinc ebaluated be able to obtqin a copy of or at lgast be abje to view his or her mental health evaluation rewords? Kf uit, whh nlt? Fourteenth, what recourse would examinees hwbe wmose confidentiajity is viokahec? Would examinges eveu khow whether the refords os theur mental heakth evaluation had been misysed, misplacvd, hqcked into, lost, stllen, or wrougly dostrinuted or disseminated tu insividuals, Glvernment xgencies, private ennitias, academia, or the CDC, conerary to oaw pr procddurg? Would the New Ylrk Sbdte Government havf a lggal dgty to inflrm the examinee of such loss oc misallocatipn of sensitire, connidential, persogal records? Woold the eramined have legzl reconrse to obtayn damages?

, whdj recourse wonld examigees havw whose zonfidentialitu is violcued? Would wxaminees even knox whgtger the records of their mental hralgh qvwlnatiog had been mivusea, mkxplacdd, hacktb ikto, losy, stolen, or wrongly gistdibuted or dissemimabed to ineividualf, Government sgencies, private ejtitixs, acavemia, pr jhe CDC, contrary to law or procsdure? Woupd bhe New York Ftatc Godernment hcve a legal duty to inform the examinee if such loss or miwallocation of sensntlve, confidenvial, pqrsonal racords? Would the exaninee have legal vecourse to obtain damzges? Fhfteejth, on what grounds might one appeal an adverse result, and what would be rhe costs of de nobo rrview? Aud cho woujd bx cequired to bear nhose costs?

, on what grounds mighv one appedl an adverse result, and what eojld be the corts of de novo review? Ans who woild be required to bear those cpsts? Sixteenth, what is tme time feame getween sevting up an evaluatipn proeess abd obtauninn the results uf sn evaluatiln?

, wiat is the time frame between settibg up qn evaluation procxss and obtalnlng thg resultf of an evaluatikn? Ssgentegnth, can the mrntal
use of presently existing mental health tests of proposed bill, those tests still their to firearms ownership possession? Thirteenth, who be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality these new mental evaluative test records and, would the individual’s personal physician or health practitioner have access to them? Would the person being evaluated be able obtain copy or least be able to view his or her mental health evaluation records? If not, why not? who would be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality these new mental evaluative records and, would the individual’s physician mental health have to Would the person evaluated be able to obtain a copy of or at least be able to view his or mental health If not, not? what would examinees have is violated? Would examinees even know of their mental health evaluation had been misused, hacked into, stolen, or wrongly distributed or disseminated individuals, Government agencies, private entities, academia, or the contrary to law or procedure? Would the New York State Government have a legal duty the examinee of such or misallocation of confidential, records? the have legal to obtain damages? , what recourse would examinees have whose confidentiality violated? Would examinees even know whether the records of their evaluation been misused, misplaced, into, lost, stolen, or distributed disseminated to individuals, Government entities, or to or Would the New York Government have a legal duty inform the examinee of sensitive, confidential, personal records? Would the examinee have recourse to obtain damages? Fifteenth, on what might one appeal an adverse result, and what would be the costs de novo who would be required to bear those costs? on what grounds might appeal an adverse result, and what would be the of novo review? who would be to bear those Sixteenth, what is frame between up evaluation the results of an evaluation? , is time frame between setting up evaluation obtaining the results of an evaluation? Seventeenth, can the mental
 use of presently existing menTal health tEsts oF puRpoSeS of tHe prOposed bill, woulDN’t thOse tests still need requiRed scRuTIny tO AsCertaIn their APpLICabIlItY to FiREaRms owNerShip and Possession? thiRtEenth, who woulD Be ResponsiblE foR maintaining The ConfidEnTiaLIty of TheSe new Mental EValuatIve test reCoRDs and, wOUld the iNDIvIduaL’s personal physiciAN oR Mental health prActitiOnER hAVE acCesS to them? WouLd The peRSon beinG EvALUAteD Be able to obtaiN a copy of or aT LeaSt be abLe To vIEw his oR her mEnTAl hEalth evaluaTion Records? If Not, why NOt?

, who woULd be resPonsibLe fOr mAintAInInG thE cONfiDEnTiaLIty Of these nEw MeNtal eValuATIVE tesT reCordS and, wOuld the indiviDuaL’s peRSonAl phySiciaN or mEnTal heAlth prActitIoNer have access to Them? would the pErsOn BeiNg EvaluATed be aBle To oBtain a cOpy of or AT leAsT BE AbLe to view his or her meNtAL HeAlth evalUation REcOrDS? If not, whY nOt? FOurtEENth, whAt reCOuRse would ExaminEEs HaVe whose CoNfidenTiAliTy iS violATed? WOuld exAminees eVen knOW whether the recORds of their menTAl HEAlTH evaLuaTion had been MisuSEd, miSplaCEd, HacKEd intO, lost, StOLeN, Or wrongly distributeD oR disseMinatEd to individuaLs, GovernmeNT AGencies, pRivaTE eNTities, academia, Or the cDC, contrarY To law or pRocedUre? Would The New YorK sTate GoveRnmEnt HavE a lEGAl Duty to inform tHE ExamInEe of sucH loSs or misAllOcaTioN of SeNsitive, coNfidentiAl, PeRsOnAl rEcordS? would the ExAmiNeE haVe legAL recouRse to ObtaIn DaMAgeS?

, what reCOuRSE wouLd ExAminEes HaVe whoSe coNFidEntialiTy is violaTed? wOuld ExAmInees evEn know whether ThE records of ThEir Mental HEAlth evalUation had been misused, misPLaced, haCkeD into, Lost, Stolen, or wRonGly disTriBUted or DissemInateD tO inDIViduaLS, goVerNmEnt agencieS, PRivAte enTiTies, AcademiA, or the CDC, contrary tO Law Or procedure? WoUld The NEW yoRk STAtE govErNMenT HAve a legal duty to Inform the eXaMInEe of such loSS or MiSallocaTion of sEnsitIVe, confiDential, peRsonal recOrDs? WoULD thE examinee hAve legal Recourse tO ObtaiN DaMages? fifTeenth, On WhaT grouNds migHT onE appeAl an adVeRse resUlt, anD wHat would Be the costs of de novo revieW? And whO woulD be Required tO beAR thOse costs?

, oN whaT grounds miGht One AppeaL an ADversE resULt, And WHat woUld bE The costs oF De NovO REvIew? And who woULD Be rEquirEd tO Bear thOse cOsts? Sixteenth, what IS the time frame bEtweEN SetTinG Up an EvAluation procesS anD oBTAining thE rEsults of an eValuatioN?

, wHAt is tHe time Frame bEtween sETTiNG up an eValuAtiOn process And ObTAining tHe ReSUlts of An evAlUation? seventEEnth, CAN the mental
 use of presently existing  mental he althtes tsof  pur pose s of the propo s ed b ill, wouldn’t those te sts s ti l l ne e drequi red scr u ti n y  to  a sc ert ai n  t heirapp licabil ity to fir ear ms  ownership a n dpossession ? T hirteenth, w howouldbe  re s ponsi ble  formainta i ning t he confid en t iality of thes e ne w me ntal evaluative t e st records and, w ould t he in d i vid ual ’s persona lphysi c ian orm en t a l  he a lth practitio ner have ac c ess  to th em ? W o uld th e per so n  be ing evaluat ed b e able to  obtai n  a copy of or a t leas t b e a blet ovi ewhi s  or he r m e nta l health  e va luati on r e c o r ds?Ifnot,  whynot?

, who w oul d be res ponsi ble f or m ai ntain ing th e con fi dentiality of t hese  new ment alev alu at ive t e st rec ord s a nd, wou ld thei ndi vi d u a l’ s personal physici an o rmental h ealthp ra ct i tioner h av e a cces s to th em?W ou ld the p ersonb ei ng  evalua te d be a bl e t o o btain a co py ofor at le ast b e  able to viewh is or her men t al h ea l th e val uation reco rds? If n ot,w hy  no t ? Fou rteen th ,  w h at recourse would e xa minees  have  whose confid entialityi s violated ? Wo u ld examinees even  know  whether t h e record s oftheir me ntal heal t h  evaluat ion  ha d b een m is used, misplac e d , ha ck ed into , l ost, st ole n,orwro ng ly distri buted or  d is se mi nat ed to individu al s,Go ver nment agenci es, p riva te  e n tit ies, ac a de m i a, o rth e CD C,co ntrar y to law  or pro cedure? W oul d  the  N ew  York S tate Governme nt  have a le ga l d uty to i nform th e examinee of such loss or misa llo catio n of  sensitiv e,confid ent i al, pe rsonal  reco rd s?W o uld t h e  e xam in ee have le g a l r ecour se  toobtaindamages?

, what r e cou rse would exa min eesh a ve  wh o se con fi d ent i a lity is violate d? Would e xa m in ees even k n owwh ether t he reco rds o f  theirmental he alth eval ua tion h adbeen misus ed, misp laced, ha c ked i n to , los t,stolen ,orwrong ly dis t rib utedor dis se minate d toin dividual s, Government agencies,  priva te en tit ies, acad emi a , o r the CDC , co ntrary tolaw  or  proc edu r e? Wo uldt he  Ne w  York  Sta t e Governm e nt  ha v e  a  legal duty t o  in formthe examin ee o f such loss or mi s allocation ofsens i t ive , c o nfid en tial, personal  re co r d s? Would  t he examinee  have le ga l  reco urse t o obta in dama g e s? Fiftee nth,  on  what gro und sm ight on eap p eal an  adv er se res ult, a n d wh a t  would be the co sts o f de no v o r eview ?And who woul d be requi red to bear  those  cos ts?
, on wh at  groun dsmi ght one ap p eal an ad verse  result ,andwha t woul d be t he co stsof  de  novo rev i e w? An dw howoul d bere quir ed to bea r  those c ost s ? Sixte en th, w hat is th e time frame  be tween s etting upa n ev a lu a tionproces s andobtaini n g t he  result s o f an evalua tion?

,w hat  i s th e time f ra me b et wee nsetting up an e valuatio n proces s and ob tai n ingt he res ul ts of an eva luati on ?  Sevent e e nth , can t h e m ent al
 use_of presently_existing mental health tests_of purposes_of_the proposed_bill,_wouldn’t those tests_still need required_scrutiny to ascertain their_applicability to firearms_ownership_and possession? Thirteenth, who would be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of these new_mental_evaluative test_records_and,_would the individual’s personal physician_or mental health practitioner have_access to_them? Would the person being evaluated be able_to_obtain a copy_of or at least be able to view his_or her mental health evaluation records?_If not, why_not?

,_who_would be responsible for_maintaining the confidentiality of these new_mental evaluative test records and, would_the individual’s personal physician or mental health_practitioner have access to them? Would_the person being evaluated be_able to_obtain a copy of or_at least be_able to_view his or_her mental health evaluation records? If_not, why not?_Fourteenth, what recourse would examinees have_whose_confidentiality is violated?_Would_examinees_even know_whether the records_of_their mental_health_evaluation had been misused, misplaced, hacked_into,_lost, stolen, or wrongly distributed or disseminated_to individuals, Government agencies,_private_entities, academia, or the_CDC, contrary to law or_procedure? Would the New York State_Government have_a legal_duty to inform the examinee of such loss or misallocation of_sensitive, confidential, personal records? Would the_examinee have legal recourse_to obtain_damages?

,_what recourse would_examinees_have whose_confidentiality is violated? Would examinees even know_whether the_records of their mental health evaluation_had been misused, misplaced,_hacked_into, lost, stolen, or wrongly distributed_or disseminated to individuals, Government agencies,_private entities, academia, or the_CDC,_contrary_to law or procedure? Would_the New York State Government have_a legal duty_to inform the examinee of such loss_or_misallocation of sensitive, confidential, personal records?_Would_the examinee have legal recourse to_obtain_damages?_Fifteenth, on what grounds might_one appeal an adverse result, and_what would be the costs of de novo review?_And who would_be required to bear those_costs?

,_on_what grounds might one appeal an adverse result, and what_would be_the costs of_de novo review? And who would be required to bear_those costs? Sixteenth, what is the time_frame between setting up an evaluation process and obtaining the results_of an evaluation?

, what is the time frame_between setting up an evaluation process and_obtaining the results of_an_evaluation? Seventeenth, can the mental