. Because I expected that authors did their job well and too busy answering stupid questions during the round.

One more time I spend ~15 minutes trying to prove that my answer for sample is incorrect. When I did it, I send this clarification: "Are you sure that answer for third sample is 34? For me it seems that there are 3 valid trees, in each of them there are 6 possible ways to choose pair of vertices, and for each path there are two possible winning moves for Ember, so the answer should be 36." Compare this to what you do.

I also think that CF should abandon the practice of answering every clarification if possible. It will decrease the number of clarifications and decrease the time to answer one clarification. If I can answer "Read the problem statement", that should be the answer. If I can answer "No comments", that should be the answer.

I think I'm finished with whining about my statements. Now about this doomed community of supposedly smart people.

The thing you did called bullying. There are people who downvote everything I write independent of content. Next there are people who disliked the consequences of my words, even my comment is correct. And there are also people who don't like that I'm saying my thoughts and don't respect their idols.

I liked first comment about "should stop creating problems", and first comment about this after the round. All others don't have own thoughts and have to repeat one thing over and over again. Now it is not a joke, it is being animals.

The same goes for "mind is weak". Yeah, guys, you are so original, it was not me who said it first.

To adequate people in this community: I'm tired of speaking truth. This not your truth? Explain me why am I not right, change my point of view. You think that I'm right in some cases? Speak it up. These animals can attack lone people, but if they will see that I'm not alone, they could think for once. You think that I have no right to insult people, but the idea is correct? Downvote me, say that wording is bad, but express that you agree with meaning.

MikeMirzayanov, I understand that for you quantity is more important than quality. I'm happy that you have your army of stupid fanatics who will write "You forget to hail Mike" under each post. This army has defeated me
. Because I expected that authors did their job well and excessively interfering answering stupid question during the beat. 

 One more time I spend ~15 minutes hear to prove that my answer for sample distribution is wrong. When I did it, I commit this clarification: " Are you sure that solution for third sample is 34? For me it seems that there are 3 valid trees, in each of them there are 6 possible ways to choose couple of vertices, and for each path there are two potential winning moves for Ember, so the answer should be 36. " Compare this to what you do. 

 I also remember that CF should abandon the practice of answering every clarification if possible. It will decrease the numeral of clarifications and decrease the time to answer one clarification. If I can answer " Read the problem statement ", that should be the answer. If I can answer " No comments ", that should be the answer. 

 I think I'm finished with whining about my statements. Now about this destine community of supposedly fresh people. 

 The thing you did called bullying. There are citizenry who downvote everything I write independent of content. Next there are citizenry who disliked the consequences of my words, even my comment is correct. And there are besides people who don't like that I'm saying my thoughts and don't respect their idols. 

 I liked first remark about " should stop creating problems ", and first comment about this after the rung. All others don't have own thoughts and have to repeat one thing over and over again. Now it is not a antic, it is being animals. 

 The like goes for " mind is weak ". Yeah, guys, you are so original, it was not me who say it first. 

 To adequate citizenry in this community: I'm banal of speaking truth. This not your truth? excuse me why am I not right, change my point of view. You think that I'm right in some cases? Speak it up. These animals can attack lone people, but if they will understand that I'm not alone, they could think for once. You think that I experience no right to insult people, but the idea is correct? Downvote me, say that wording is regretful, but express that you agree with meaning. 

 MikeMirzayanov, I understand that for you quantity is more important than quality. I'm happy that you have your united states army of stupid fanatics who will write " You forget to hail Mike " under each post. This army has defeated me
. Befause I expected that auuhors did their job well and tko busy xnswering stupid questions dnrint the round.

One more time I rpend ~15 mijutes trting ro prove tizt my akfwer nor scm'le is incorrecj. When I did it, I send thiv zlcrification: "Are you sure that answer for thorf sample is 34? Fjr mt ie sesms that there are 3 valid trees, in each oh them there arr 6 possible ways to choose paig of vertices, and vor each pajg trwre are two oossible wpuning moves for Ember, so the answer should be 36." Eompare thiw ro avat you do.

I also think that GG shound abancon the practige of anwwering every clarifiration if possible. Ij will decsecse the number of claeidicathons and eecfeaae tge timf tk answer ohe clarificqtion. If I can answtr "Wvsd the problsm staeeient", that should be the answer. If I can anawer "No comments", that syould be the answer.

I jhink I'm fynished with whining about my statements. Now aboud thia doimcd cunmknity of supposedly smart people.

The thing you sic balled bullying. Tmere are people whp foegvote everythkng I cdife independent of fontent. Next there art peolle who disliked the conseqyences of my qords, even my commznt is correet. And therr are also people who dun't mike that I'l saying jh thoughts and dun't raspect their idols.

I liked sirst comnent about "rhoukd sto[ creating problems", and first commfnt ayout dhis after the round. All others don't have own thoughts sng hdve to rzpeat pne thing ovew and over agann. Now ic is nut a joke, pt is beiig animals.

Thq same goes fmt "mind is wean". Yeah, gtys, tou qre so ufiginal, it was not me wkj saud it first.

To adeqmate kekple in this conmubity: I'm tired og soeahijg twgth. This not youf tfith? Ebplain me wmy xm I not right, change my poiht of view. You thimk that I'm right ig some cases? Xpeak it up. These wnimans ran atyach lone people, but if they will see that I'm not alone, trey goulq think fox once. You think that I have no right to insult people, buj the idea is correct? Cownvote me, say ehat wordhng is bad, but exprews that you agree with meaning.

MikeMirzzyanov, I unferstand that for you quantity is more important than quality. I'm happy thqt you have your admy pf stlpib fcnatics who xill write "You fogget to hail Mike" under each posv. This armf kas defeated me
. Because I expected that authors did well too busy stupid questions during I ~15 minutes trying prove that my for sample is incorrect. When I it, I send this clarification: "Are you sure that answer for third sample 34? For me it seems that there are 3 valid trees, in each them are possible to choose pair of vertices, and for each path there are two possible winning moves for so the answer should be 36." Compare this what you do. I think that CF should abandon practice answering every if It decrease the number clarifications and decrease the time to answer one clarification. If I can answer "Read the problem statement", should be If I answer comments", should be the think I'm finished with whining about about this doomed community of supposedly smart people. thing you called bullying. There are people who everything I write independent of content. Next there people who disliked the consequences of my words, even my comment is correct. And there people who don't like I'm saying my and respect idols. liked first about "should stop creating problems", and first comment about this after round. All others don't have own thoughts and have to thing and over again. it is not a it being animals. The same "mind weak". are original, was not me who it first. To adequate people this community: I'm tired your truth? Explain me why am I not change my point of view. You think I'm right in some cases? Speak it up. These animals can attack people, but will see that I'm not alone, they could for once. You think I have no right to insult people, but the is Downvote me, that wording is but express that agree with meaning. understand that you is quality. I'm happy that you have army stupid fanatics who will write forget Mike" under each post. This army has defeated me
. Because I expected that authoRs did their Job weLl aNd tOo Busy AnswEring stupid queSTionS during the round.

One more Time I SpENd ~15 miNUtEs tryIng to prOVe THAt mY aNsWer FoR SaMple iS inCorrect. when I did it, i seNd This clarificATiOn: "Are you suRe tHat answer for ThiRd sampLe Is 34? FOR me it SeeMs thaT there ARe 3 valiD trees, in eAcH Of them THere are 6 POSsIble Ways to choose pair oF VeRTices, and for eacH path tHeRE aRE Two PosSible winniNg Moves FOr Ember, SO tHE ANswER should be 36." CompAre this to whAT yoU do.

I alSo ThiNK that Cf shouLd ABanDon the practIce oF answerinG every CLarificATion if pOssiblE. It WilL decREaSe The NuMBer OF cLarIFicAtions anD dEcRease The tIME TO ansWer One cLarifIcation. If I can AnsWer "REAd tHe proBlem sTateMeNt", thaT shoulD be thE aNswer. If I can answEr "No Comments", tHat ShOulD bE the aNSwer.

I tHinK I'm FinisheD with whINinG aBOUT mY statements. Now abouT tHIS dOomed comMunity OF sUpPOsedly smArT peOple.

tHE thinG you DId Called buLlying. tHeRe Are peopLe Who dowNvOte EveRythiNG I wrIte indEpendent Of conTEnt. Next there arE People who dislIKeD THe COnseQueNces of my worDs, evEN my cOmmeNT iS coRRect. ANd theRe ARe ALso people who don't likE tHat I'm sAying My thoughts and Don't respecT THEir idols.

i likED fIRst comment abouT "shouLd stop creaTIng problEms", anD first coMment abouT THis after The RouNd. ALl oTHErS don't have own tHOUghtS aNd have tO rePeat one ThiNg oVer And OvEr again. NoW it is not A jOkE, iT iS beIng anIMals.

The sAmE goEs For "Mind iS Weak". YeAh, guyS, you ArE sO OriGinal, it WAs NOT me wHo SaId it FirSt.

to adeQuatE PeoPle in thIs communiTy: I'M TireD oF sPeaking Truth. This not yOuR truth? ExplAiN me Why am I NOT right, chAnge my point of view. You thiNK that I'm RigHt in sOme cAses? Speak It uP. These AniMAls can Attack Lone pEoPle, BUT if thEY WiLl sEe That I'm not aLONe, tHey coUlD thiNk for onCe. You think that I havE No rIght to insult pEopLe, buT THe IdeA Is COrrEcT? dowNVOte me, say that worDing is bad, bUt EXpRess that yoU AgrEe With meaNing.

MikEMirzAYanov, I uNderstand That for yoU qUantITY is More importAnt than qUality. I'm hAPpy thAT yOu havE yoUr army Of StuPid faNatics WHo wIll wrIte "You FoRget to Hail MIkE" under eaCh post. This army has defeatEd me
. Because I expected thatauthors di d the irjob  w ellandtoo busy answe r ingstupid questions durin g the  r o und. 
O ne mo re time Is p end  ~ 15  mi nu t es  tryi ngto prov e that myans we r for sample is  incorrect . W hen I did it , I  sendth isc larif ica tion:  "Arey ou sur e that an sw e r fort hird sa m p le  is34? For me it see m st hat there are3 vali dt re e s , i n e ach of the mthere are 6 p o ss i b l e w a ys to choosepair of ver t ice s, and  f ore ach pa th th er e  ar e two possi blewinning m oves f o r Ember ,  so the  answe r s hou ld b e  3 6. " C om p are th ist o w hat youdo .
I al so t h i n k  tha t C F sh ouldabandon the p rac tice ofanswe ringever yclari ficati on if  p ossible. It wil l de crease th e n um ber  o f cla r ificat ion s a nd decr ease th e  ti me t o  a nswer one clarific at i o n.  If I ca n answ e r"R e ad the p ro ble m st a t ement ", t h at  shouldbe the an sw er. IfIcan an sw er"No  comm e nts" , that  shouldbe th e  answer.

I th i nk I'm finish e dw i th whin ing  about my s tate m ents . No w  a bou t  this  doom ed co m munity of supposedl ysmartpeopl e.

The thing  you did c a l l ed bully ing. Th e re are peoplewho d ownvote ev e rythingI wri te indep endent of c ontent.Nex t t her e a r e  p eople who dis l i kedth e conse que nces of  my  wo rds , e ve n my comm ent is c or re ct .And  ther e  are als opeo pl e w ho do n 't lik e tha t I' msa y ing  my tho u gh t s  and  d on 't r esp ec t the ir i d ols .

I li ked first  co m ment  a bo ut "sho uld stop crea ti ng problem s" , a nd fir s t  comment  about this after the r o und. Al l o thers  don 't have o wnthough tsa nd hav e to r epeat  o net h ing o v e rand  o ver again. N owit is  n ot a  joke,it is being animal s .
The same goes  fo r "m i n disw ea k ".Ye a h,g u ys, you are sooriginal,it wa s not me w h o s ai d it fi rst.

T o ade q uate pe ople in t his commu ni ty:I ' m t ired of sp eaking t ruth. Thi s  noty ou r tru th?  Expla in  me  whyam I n o t r ight,  chang emy poi nt of  v iew. You  think that I'm right i n some  case s?Speak itup. The se animal s ca n attack l one  pe ople,  bu t  if t heyw il l s e e tha t I' m  not alon e ,the y co uld think f o r onc e. Yo u t h ink th at I  have no right to insult people,  but t heide a  isco rrect? Downvot e m e, s ay thatwo rding is ba d, but e xp r ess t hat yo u agre e withm e an i ng.

M ikeM irz ayanov, I  un de r stand t ha tf or you  qua nt ity is  morei mpor t a nt than quality.  I'mh a ppy t h atyou h av e youra rmyof stupidfanatics wh o will  wri te "Y ou forg et  to ha ilMi ke" undere ach post.  This  army h as  def eat ed me
. Because_I expected_that authors did their_job well_and_too busy_answering_stupid questions during_the round.

One more_time I spend ~15_minutes trying to_prove_that my answer for sample is incorrect. When I did it, I send this_clarification:_"Are you_sure_that_answer for third sample is_34? For me it seems_that there_are 3 valid trees, in each of them_there_are 6 possible_ways to choose pair of vertices, and for each_path there are two possible winning_moves for Ember,_so_the_answer should be 36."_Compare this to what you do.

I_also think that CF should abandon_the practice of answering every clarification if_possible. It will decrease the number_of clarifications and decrease the_time to_answer one clarification. If I_can answer "Read_the problem_statement", that should_be the answer. If I can_answer "No comments",_that should be the answer.

I think_I'm_finished with whining_about_my_statements. Now_about this doomed_community_of supposedly_smart_people.

The thing you did called bullying._There_are people who downvote everything I write_independent of content. Next_there_are people who disliked_the consequences of my words,_even my comment is correct. And_there are_also people_who don't like that I'm saying my thoughts and don't respect_their idols.

I liked first comment about_"should stop creating problems",_and first_comment_about this after_the_round. All_others don't have own thoughts and have_to repeat_one thing over and over again._Now it is not_a_joke, it is being animals.

The same_goes for "mind is weak". Yeah,_guys, you are so original,_it_was_not me who said it_first.

To adequate people in this community:_I'm tired of_speaking truth. This not your truth? Explain_me_why am I not right, change_my_point of view. You think that_I'm_right_in some cases? Speak it_up. These animals can attack lone_people, but if they will see that I'm not_alone, they could_think for once. You think_that_I_have no right to insult people, but the idea is_correct? Downvote_me, say that_wording is bad, but express that you agree with meaning.

MikeMirzayanov,_I understand that for you quantity is_more important than quality. I'm happy that you have your army_of stupid fanatics who will write "You forget_to hail Mike" under each post. This_army has defeated me