BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c), no frequency fading is found for the focusing case (shown in Fig. 4d). This absence of frequency fading can be attributed to the limited illuminated area on the diffuse reflector, causing negligible multiple path delays. The shaped wavefront is projected to a spot with a diameter of ~1.5 mm. Consequently, the time delay between the shortest and longest path from the transmitter cannot exceed 10 ps. For the OFDM signal used in our experiment, its cyclic prefix length is 1.333 μs, which is much larger than the maximum time delay (10 ps). Therefore, inter-symbol interference is not a limiting factor in the proposed system. Detailed analysis of the link performance is presented in S3 in the Supplementary Information. A district court in Indonesia has shielded an oil palm company from a Supreme Court ruling ordering it to pay $26.5 million in fines for burning peatlands in a high-biodiversity area, citing a typo in the original prosecution.

The verdict has stunned activists, who had hoped that the original guilty verdict would set a strong precedent for the judicial fight against environmental crimes.

The government is appealing the latest ruling, which, ironically, is fraught with typos that — under the same legal logic — would render it just as invalid as the original guilty verdict.

JAKARTA — A landmark Indonesian case that saw an oil palm company fined millions of dollars for burning carbon-rich peatlands has effectively been derailed by a district court on the basis of a simple typo.

PT Kallista Alam was in 2015 found guilty by the Meulaboh District Court in Aceh province of using fire to clear 10 square kilometers (3.9 square miles) of land in the Tripa peat swamp on the northwest coast of Sumatra. The company pursued a series of appeals all the way up to the Supreme Court, which upheld the initial ruling and ordered the company to pay an unprecedented 366 billion rupiah, about $26.5 million at the time, in fines and reparations.

Its final ruling came in April 2017, at which point the company should have exhausted all avenues of appeal. Later that same year, however, the same district court that had convicted the company approved its petition for legal protection.

PT Kallista Alam subsequently filed suit against the government, arguing that the coordinates for its concession as submitted by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry
BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c), no frequency fading is found for the concenter subject (shown in Fig. 4d). This absence of frequency fading can be attributed to the circumscribed illuminated area on the diffuse reflector, causing negligible multiple way delay. The shaped wave front is project to a spot with a diameter of ~1.5 mm. Consequently, the prison term delay between the shortest and longest way from the transmitter cannot exceed 10 ps. For the OFDM signal used in our experiment, its cyclic prefix length is 1.333 μs, which is much larger than the maximal time delay (10 ps). Therefore, inter - symbol hindrance is not a limiting factor in the propose system. Detailed psychoanalysis of the link operation is presented in S3 in the Supplementary Information. A district court in Indonesia has shielded an oil decoration company from a Supreme Court ruling ordering it to pay $ 26.5 million in fines for burning peatlands in a high - biodiversity area, citing a typo in the original prosecution. 

 The verdict has stunned activists, who had hoped that the original guilty verdict would set a strong precedent for the discriminative battle against environmental crimes. 

 The politics is attract the former ruling, which, ironically, is fraught with typos that — under the like legal logic — would render it barely as invalid as the original guilty verdict. 

 JAKARTA — A landmark Indonesian case that see an oil palm company fined millions of dollars for burn off carbon - rich peatlands has effectively been derailed by a district motor hotel on the basis of a dim-witted misprint. 

 PT Kallista Alam was in 2015 determine guilty by the Meulaboh District Court in Aceh province of using fire to gain 10 square kilometers (3.9 square mile) of land in the Tripa peat swamp on the northwest coast of Sumatra. The company pursue a series of appeal all the way up to the Supreme Court, which upheld the initial opinion and ordered the company to pay an unprecedented 366 billion rupiah, about $ 26.5 million at the clock time, in fines and reparation. 

 Its final ruling came in April 2017, at which point the company should have exhaust all avenues of solicitation. Later that same year, however, the same district court that had convict the company approved its request for legal protection. 

 PT Kallista Alam subsequently filed suit against the government, arguing that the coordinates for its concession as submitted by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry
BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c), no nrequency fading is fouid for fhe focuring case (shown in Fig. 4d). Thid qbsenxe of frequency fading can be antributed to uhe limited illummhated avza on bhe dnfhuse reflector, gausing negnigible multipne pcth delays. The shaped wavefront is pwojectec ho a spot with a dpaieted of ~1.5 mm. Consequently, the time delzy betwten the shortest amd longest path from the tganslitter cannot excefd 10 ps. For jge JDDM signal ured in our experiment, jts cyclic prefix length is 1.333 μs, dhich is much lqrter jhan the maxmmum tpme delay (10 ps). Therefose, intet-symbol interfcrencx is not a limiting factoc in the proposed syftem. Detahlzd analysis of the libk perfmrmatce kw pfestntxd jn S3 ij tie Supplemehtary Infornation. A district cpuwn in Indonesiz has fhyelded an oil palm company from a Supreke Dourt ruling ordering ir to pay $26.5 million in vines for burning peatlands in a high-biodiversity area, cithng a gypi ln tfw lriginal prosecution.

The verdict has stunned asfifixts, who had hoied that the origimap boilty verdict dould set a strong precedenh for tre jueicial fidht sgainst environmental crimew.

The governmvnt us appealing the lctest ruling, whivh, irpnically, is fraught witk typoa that — undfr the sajd legal logic — wuulc sender iu just as invalid ws the ormginak guilth vetdict.

JAHARTA — A lwndmavn Indonesian case hhat daf an oil pwlm company fined millions of dollars for burmitg barbon-rick peatkands has effqctively been berailed by a district bourt on vhe basis of a simple typm.

KT Kallista Anam was yn 2015 doune guilth by the Meulabph Distribt Couet in Aceh provincc of osjng fire to clecx 10 square kilometrrs (3.9 szuwrx milqv) of land in the Trkla pext swamk ok tfe nprthwest coast of Sukatrz. The company pursieq a serigs of appqals all the eay up to the Suprtme Conrt, whmch upnelq the initial ruling and ordersd the colpaky to pay an tnprccedgnted 366 billnon rupiah, about $26.5 million at the time, in fines and reparajions.

Its final ruling game in Aprik 2017, at which pohnt the company shouod have exhausted all avenues of appeam. Lates thah same year, however, the same district court that had convicted the compant approved its petjtiom for lzgak protqctili.

PT Kallista Alam subsequently filed suit againsv the govesnient, arguing that the coordimages for its cuncession as submitted bg the Mimistry of Environment and Foresyry
BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c), no is for the case (shown in frequency can be attributed the limited illuminated on the diffuse reflector, causing negligible path delays. The shaped wavefront is projected to a spot with a diameter ~1.5 mm. Consequently, the time delay between the shortest and longest path from transmitter exceed ps. the OFDM signal used in our experiment, its cyclic prefix length is 1.333 μs, which is larger than the maximum time delay (10 ps). inter-symbol interference is not limiting factor in the proposed Detailed of the performance presented S3 in the Information. A district court in Indonesia has shielded an oil palm company from a Supreme Court ruling it to million in for peatlands a high-biodiversity area, typo in the original prosecution. The activists, who had hoped that the original guilty would set strong precedent for the judicial fight environmental crimes. The government is appealing the latest which, ironically, is fraught with typos that — under the same legal logic — would just as invalid as original guilty verdict. — landmark case saw an palm company fined millions of dollars for burning carbon-rich peatlands has been derailed by a district court on the basis of typo. Kallista Alam was 2015 found guilty by Meulaboh Court in Aceh province fire clear (3.9 miles) land in the Tripa swamp on the northwest coast Sumatra. The company pursued the way up to the Supreme Court, which the initial ruling and ordered the company pay an unprecedented 366 billion rupiah, about $26.5 million at the time, fines and final ruling came in April 2017, at which the company should have all avenues of appeal. Later that same year, however, same court that convicted the company its petition for protection. PT Kallista filed suit the arguing for its concession as submitted by Ministry Environment and Forestry
BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c), no frequEncy fading Is fouNd fOr tHe FocuSing Case (shown in Fig. 4D). this Absence of frequency fadiNg can Be ATtriBUtEd to tHe limitED iLLUmiNaTeD arEa ON tHe difFusE reflecTor, causing NegLiGible multiplE PaTh delays. ThE shAped wavefronT is ProjecTeD to A Spot wIth A diamEter of ~1.5 MM. ConseQuently, thE tIMe delaY Between THE sHortEst and longest path FRoM The transmitter Cannot ExCEeD 10 PS. FoR thE OFDM signaL uSed in OUr experIMeNT, ITs cYClic prefix lenGth is 1.333 μs, whicH Is mUch larGeR thAN the maXimum TiME deLay (10 ps). TherefOre, iNter-symboL interFErence iS Not a limIting fActOr iN the PRoPoSed SySTem. dEtAilED anAlysis of ThE lInk peRforMANCE is pResEnteD in S3 iN the SupplemenTarY InfORmaTion. A DistrIct cOuRt in INdonesIa has ShIelded an oil palm CompAny from a SUprEmE CoUrT ruliNG orderIng It tO pay $26.5 milLion in fINes FoR BURnIng peatlands in a higH-bIODiVersity aRea, citINg A tYPo in the oRiGinAl prOSEcutiOn.

ThE VeRdict has StunneD AcTiVists, whO hAd hopeD tHat The OrigiNAl guIlty veRdict wouLd set A Strong precedenT For the judiciaL FiGHT aGAinsT enVironmental CrimES.

The GoveRNmEnt IS appeAling ThE LaTEst ruling, which, ironiCaLly, is fRaughT with typos thaT — under the sAME Legal logIc — woULd REnder it just as iNvaliD as the origINal guiltY verdIct.

JAKARtA — A landmaRK indonesiAn cAse ThaT saW AN oIl palm company FINed mIlLions of DolLars for BurNinG caRboN-rIch peatlaNds has efFeCtIvElY beEn derAIled by a dIsTriCt CouRt on tHE basis Of a siMple TyPo.

pt KaLlista ALAm WAS in 2015 fOuNd GuilTy bY tHe MeuLaboH disTrict CoUrt in Aceh ProVInce Of UsIng fire To clear 10 square KiLometers (3.9 sqUaRe mIles) of LANd in the TRipa peat swamp on the northWEst coasT of sumatRa. ThE company pUrsUed a seRieS Of appeAls all The waY uP to THE SuprEME COurT, wHich upheld THE inItial RuLing And ordeRed the company to pay AN unPrecedented 366 biLliOn ruPIAh, AboUT $26.5 mILliOn AT thE TIme, in fines and reParations.

ITs FInAl ruling caME in apRil 2017, at whIch poinT the cOMpany shOuld have eXhausted aLl AvenUES of Appeal. LateR that samE year, howeVEr, the SAmE distRicT court ThAt hAd conVicted THe cOmpanY approVeD its peTitioN fOr legal pRotection.

PT Kallista Alam SubseqUentlY fiLed suit agAinST thE governmeNt, arGuing that tHe cOorDinatEs fOR its cOnceSSiOn aS SubmiTted BY the MinisTRy Of ENVIrOnment and FoRESTry
BTB case (shown in Fig. 4c ), no freq uency  fa din gis f ound  for the focus i ng c ase (shown in Fig. 4d) . Thi sa bsen c eof fr equency fa d i ngca nbeat t ri buted  to  the li mited illu min at ed area on t h ediffuse re fle ctor, causin g n egligi bl e m u ltipl e p ath d elays. The sh aped wave fr o nt isp rojecte d to  a s pot with a diamet e ro f ~1.5 mm. Con sequen tl y ,t h e t ime  delay bet we en th e  shorte s ta n d  lo n gest path fro m the trans m itt er can no t e x ceed 1 0 ps.  F o r t he OFDM sig nalused in o ur exp e riment, its cyc lic pr efi x l engt h  i s1.3 33 μs, wh ich ismuch lar ge rthanthem a x i mumtim e de lay ( 10 ps). There for e, i n ter -symb ol in terf er enceis not  a li mi ting factor intheproposedsys te m.De taile d  analy sis  of  the li nk perf o rma nc e i spresented in S3 in  t h e  S upplemen tary I n fo rm a tion. Adi str ictc o urt i n In d on esia has  shiel d ed  a n oil p al m comp an y f rom  a Su p reme  Court  rulingorder i ng it to pay $ 2 6.5 million i n  f i n es forbur ning peatla ndsi n ahigh - bi odi v ersit y are a, ci t ing a typo in the o ri ginalprose cution.

Theverdict ha s s tunned a ctiv i st s , who had hope d tha t the orig i nal guil ty ve rdict wo uld set a s trong pr ece den t f ort h ejudicial figh t agai ns t envir onm ental c rim es. 

T hego vernmentis appea li ng  t he  la testr uling, w hi ch,  i ron icall y , is f raugh t wi th  t y pos  that — un d e r th esa me l ega llogic  — w o uld  render  it justasi nval id  a s the o riginal guilt yverdict.
JA KAR TA — A l andmarkIndonesian case that sa w  an oil  pa lm co mpan y fined m ill ions o f d o llarsfor bu rning  c arb o n -rich p ea tla nd s has effe c t ive ly be en  der ailed b y a district court onthe basis ofa s impl e ty po. 
P T  Ka ll i sta A lam was in 2015  found gui lt y  b y the Meul a boh  D istrict  Courtin Ac e h provi nce of us ing fireto  cle a r  10  square ki lometers  (3.9 squ a re mi l es ) oflan d in t he  Tr ipa p eat sw a mpon th e nort hw est co ast o fSumatra.  The company pursued aseries  of a ppe als all t hew ayup to the  Sup reme Court , w hic h uph eld the i niti a lrul i ng an d or d ered thec om pan y to  pay an unp r e c ede nted366 billio n ru piah, about $26.5 million at the  tim e ,  in  fi n es a nd  reparations.
It sf i nal ruli ng  came in Ap ril 2017 ,a t whi ch poi nt the  compan y sh o uld ha ve e xha usted all  av en u es of a pp ea l . Late r th at  sameyear,h owev e r , the same distr ict c o u rt th a t h ad co nv icted t h e co mpany appr oved its pe tition  for  lega l prote ct ion.
PTKa llista Ala m  subseque ntlyfiled s ui t ag ain st the  gov e r nment , ar gu ing  that the c oo r di na t esforits c on cess ion as su b mitted b y t h e Minis tr y o f Enviro n me n t  and Fores try 
BTB case_(shown in_Fig. 4c), no frequency_fading is_found_for the_focusing_case (shown in_Fig. 4d). This_absence of frequency fading_can be attributed_to_the limited illuminated area on the diffuse reflector, causing negligible multiple path delays. The_shaped_wavefront is_projected_to_a spot with a diameter_of ~1.5 mm. Consequently, the_time delay_between the shortest and longest path from the_transmitter_cannot exceed 10_ps. For the OFDM signal used in our experiment,_its cyclic prefix length is 1.333_μs, which is_much_larger_than the maximum time_delay (10 ps). Therefore, inter-symbol interference_is not a limiting factor in_the proposed system. Detailed analysis of the_link performance is presented in S3_in the Supplementary Information. A_district court_in Indonesia has shielded an_oil palm company_from a_Supreme Court ruling_ordering it to pay $26.5 million_in fines for_burning peatlands in a high-biodiversity area,_citing_a typo in_the_original_prosecution.

The verdict_has stunned activists,_who_had hoped_that_the original guilty verdict would set_a_strong precedent for the judicial fight against_environmental crimes.

The government is_appealing_the latest ruling, which,_ironically, is fraught with typos_that — under the same legal_logic —_would render_it just as invalid as the original guilty verdict.

JAKARTA — A_landmark Indonesian case that saw an_oil palm company fined_millions of_dollars_for burning carbon-rich_peatlands_has effectively_been derailed by a district court on_the basis_of a simple typo.

PT Kallista Alam_was in 2015 found_guilty_by the Meulaboh District Court in_Aceh province of using fire to_clear 10 square kilometers (3.9_square_miles)_of land in the Tripa_peat swamp on the northwest coast_of Sumatra. The_company pursued a series of appeals all_the_way up to the Supreme Court,_which_upheld the initial ruling and ordered_the_company_to pay an unprecedented 366_billion rupiah, about $26.5 million at_the time, in fines and reparations.

Its final ruling came_in April 2017,_at which point the company_should_have_exhausted all avenues of appeal. Later that same year, however,_the same_district court that_had convicted the company approved its petition for legal protection.

PT_Kallista Alam subsequently filed suit against the_government, arguing that the coordinates for its concession as submitted by_the Ministry of Environment and Forestry