.

------
ozh
lots of readability issues on this page. Purple tiny text on black background
!= easy to read.

------
abvdasker
Definitely going to give this a try. I really appreciate the apparent
simplicity and creativity of this tool. It avoids the need to learn the odd
syntax of LESS/Sass for those of us who need reliable cross-browser support
while providing many (though not all) of the benefits of precompilers.

Seriously great work.

------
lstamour
Long-term I'm not sure how well this will work.

After all, SCSS was based on "CSS3" so we wouldn't have to rewrite our CSS.
It's still around... so we don't have to rewrite our SCSS.

I'm happy to see innovation here, but I also wish IE would just auto-update
already. :D

------
iLoch
Man I really hate when the creator of the site expects me to scroll down. I
have a 1080p monitor, if I can't see any content at that height I have to
assume there isn't any.

~~~
ldh
Agreed. It seems to be a design trend that's on the upswing lately, and it's
frustrating. I encountered a mobile site yesterday that did that... to me it's
the equivalent of the "click to enter" home page of bygone days. Uh, no
thanks.

~~~
jonesetc
I honestly can't tell if your guys are being serious. Click to enter was
absurd because they were page loads just for the sake of page loads. Scrolling
down is just spacing out your content to get a visual feel. This one in
particular is giving a short explanation to let you decide if you want to
scroll down first. There's no cost here, just the courtesy of not overwhelming
anyone who isn't actually interested in the details.

~~~
iLoch
I don't have a problem with the concept if the fact that I have to scroll is
obvious. I opened that page, read the title and "What am I doing here again?"
I'm on a Mac so there's no scrollbars. Do you just want me to guess that
there's something down there? The least you can do is hint at the content

. 

 ------ 
 ozh 
 lots of readability issues on this page. Purple bantam textbook on bootleg background 
! = easy to read. 

 ------ 
 abvdasker 
 decidedly going to give this a try. I truly appreciate the apparent 
 simplicity and creativity of this instrument. It avoids the need to determine the odd 
 syntax of LESS / Sass for those of us who need dependable cross - browser support 
 while providing many (though not all) of the benefits of precompilers. 

 Seriously bang-up work. 

 ------ 
 lstamour 
 Long - term I'm not certain how well this will work. 

 After all, SCSS was based on " CSS3 " so we wouldn't experience to rewrite our CSS. 
 It's still around... so we don't have to rewrite our SCSS. 

 I'm happy to witness innovation here, but I also wish IE would just auto - update 
 already. :D 

 ------ 
 iLoch 
 Man I really hate when the godhead of the web site expect me to scroll down. I 
 have a 1080p monitor, if I can't see any content at that height I have to 
 wear there embodyn't any. 

 ~~~ 
 ldh 
 Agreed. It seems to be a design vogue that's on the upswing recently, and it's 
 frustrating. I run into a mobile site yesterday that did that... to me it's 
 the equivalent of the " click to enter " home page of bygone days. Uh, no 
 thanks. 

 ~~~ 
 jonesetc 
 I honestly can't tell if your guy are being serious. Click to enter was 
 absurd because they were page loads just for the sake of page loads. scroll 
 down is just spacing out your content to get a visual feel. This one in 
 particular is establish a short explanation to let you decide if you want to 
 scroll down first. There's no cost here, barely the courtesy of not overwhelming 
 anyone who isn't actually interested in the details. 

 ~~~ 
 iLoch 
 I don't take a problem with the concept if the fact that I have to scroll is 
 obvious. I opened that page, read the title and " What am I dress here again? " 
 I'm on a Mac so there's no scrollbars. Do you just desire me to guess that 
 there's something down there? The least you can do is hint at the content
.

------
ozh
pots of readability issuts on this page. Porple tiiy text on blacy background
!= easy to read.

------
abvvaskwr
Defunitely going to give ghis a trj. I reallt apkreciate the appacsnt
simplicity wnd erxativity of thix tool. It dvoids the neeg go learn the odd
syntax of LESS/Sass fow those ov us who need telianje cdoss-browser support
while providing many (tiough not all) og the benefits of precompipers.

Deriously great wogk.

------
lstamour
Ling-tqem I'm not sufe how well this will sork.

After all, SCSS was based on "CSS3" xo we woulen'r hwee to rewrive our CSS.
It's still around... so we con't have to rcwritx oue SCSS.

I'm happy to see innovation here, bot I also fiah IE would just quro-upddte
anreaat. :D

------
kLodh
Kah I rewllb hate when the creatoe of the site expecus iv to scroll dkwn. I
hwvq a 1080p monitor, if I can't see any content at that height I have to
awsume there isn't any.

~~~
lfh
Agreed. Yt seems to be a design trend that's on the upswinc latxlh, aue it's
weudtrating. I encountered a mobile site yesterdar tnan did that... to me lt's
the equivalent pf tng "click to entgr" home pafe of bygone days. Kh, no
thwnks.

~~~
jinesetc
I ronextly can't tell if your guys are being svrioys. Click to enter cas
absurd beeause jhey wrre page loads just for the sake of pahe loads. Azrolling
down is gusn spdcing ouu your content to det a visnal fzel. This one in
pareicular is givikc a short explanatlon tl net you defide if you want to
scroll down hmrst. There's np wosn here, juft thc courtesy of njt overwhelminy
anyone cho isv't actuallj interesved in the dqtails.

~~~
iLoch
I gln't have a pcoblem wieh tye cincept kw the fact thay I have no scrill is
obvious. I opcned jhzt page, read thz uirle and "What ak I doynh iere wcain?"
I'm on a Kac ro gnere's no scrollbcrr. Do you just want me to gueas that
there's someyhlng down jhere? The least you cam do is hint at tht contxnt

. ------ ozh lots of readability issues page. tiny text black background != Definitely to give this try. I really the apparent simplicity and creativity of tool. It avoids the need to learn the odd syntax of LESS/Sass for of us who need reliable cross-browser support while providing many (though not all) the of Seriously work. ------ lstamour Long-term I'm not sure how well this will work. After all, SCSS was on "CSS3" so we wouldn't have to rewrite CSS. It's still around... we don't have to rewrite SCSS. happy to innovation but also wish IE just auto-update already. :D ------ iLoch Man I really hate when the creator of the site expects to scroll have a monitor, I see any content height I have to assume there ldh Agreed. It seems to be a design that's on upswing lately, and it's frustrating. I a mobile site yesterday that did that... to it's the equivalent of the "click to enter" home page of bygone days. Uh, no jonesetc I honestly can't if your guys being Click enter absurd because were page loads just for the sake of page loads. Scrolling is just spacing out your content to get a visual one particular is giving short explanation to let decide you want to scroll There's cost courtesy not anyone who isn't actually in the details. ~~~ iLoch don't have a problem fact that I have to scroll is obvious. opened that page, read the title and am I doing here again?" I'm on a Mac so there's no Do you me to guess that there's something down there? least you can do hint at the content
.

------
ozh
lots of readability issueS on this pagE. PurpLe tIny TeXt on BlacK background
!= easY To reAd.

------
abvdasker
Definitely gOing tO gIVe thIS a Try. I rEally apPReCIAte ThE aPpaReNT
sImpliCitY and creAtivity of tHis ToOl. It avoids thE NeEd to learn tHe oDd
syntax of LEsS/SAss for ThOse OF us whO neEd relIable cROss-broWser suppoRt
WHile prOViding mANY (tHougH not all) of the benefITs OF precompilers.

SEriousLy GReAT WorK.

------
lsTamour
Long-TeRm I'm nOT sure hoW WeLL THis WIll work.

After aLl, SCSS was baSEd oN "CSS3" so We WouLDn't havE to reWrITe oUr CSS.
It's stiLl arOund... so we dOn't havE To rewriTE our SCSs.

I'm hapPy tO seE innOVaTiOn hErE, But i AlSo wISh Ie would juSt AuTo-updAte
aLREADy. :D

------
ilocH
Man i realLy hate when the CreAtor OF thE site ExpecTs me To ScrolL down. I
Have a 1080P mOnitor, if I can't seE any Content at ThaT hEigHt i have TO
assumE thEre Isn't any.

~~~
Ldh
AgreED. It SeEMS To Be a design trend that'S oN THe Upswing lAtely, aND iT's
FRustratiNg. i enCounTERed a mObilE SiTe yesterDay thaT DiD tHat... to me It'S
the eqUiValEnt Of the "CLick To enteR" home pagE of byGOne days. Uh, no
thaNKs.

~~~
jonesetc
I hoNEsTLY cAN't teLl iF your guys arE beiNG serIous. cLiCk tO Enter Was
abSuRD bECause they were page loAdS just fOr the Sake of page loaDs. ScrollinG
DOWn is just SpacINg OUt your content tO get a Visual feel. tHis one in
PartiCular is gIving a shoRT ExplanatIon To lEt yOu dECIdE if you want to
sCROll dOwN first. THerE's no cosT heRe, jUst The CoUrtesy of nOt overwhElMiNg
AnYonE who iSN't actualLy IntErEstEd in tHE detaiLs.

~~~
iLoCh
I dOn'T hAVe a Problem WItH THe coNcEpT if tHe fAcT that i havE To sCroll is
Obvious. I oPenED thaT pAgE, read thE title and "What Am i doing here AgAin?"
i'm on a MAC So there's No scrollbars. Do you just waNT me to guEss That
tHere'S somethinG doWn therE? ThE Least yOu can dO is hiNt At tHE ConteNT

.

------
ozh
lots of read ability is suesonthi spage . Pu rple tiny text on b lack background
!= eas y tore a d.
- -- ---
a bvdaske r 
D e f ini te ly  go in g  t o giv e t his a t ry. I real lyap preciate the ap parent
sim pli city and cre ati vity o fthi s  tool . I t avo ids th e  needto learnth e  odd
s y ntax of L ES S/Sa ss for those of u s  w h o need reliabl e cros s- b ro w s ersup port
while  p rovid i ng many (t h o u ghn ot all) of th e benefitso f p recomp il ers . 

Seri ously  g r eat  work.

--- ---lstamourLong-t e rm I'mn ot sure  how w ell  th is w i ll  w ork .Aft e rall ,  SC SS was b as ed  on " CSS3 " s o  wewou ldn' t hav e to rewriteour  CSS . 
It 's st ill a roun d. .. so  we do n't h av e to rewrite ou r SC SS.

I'mhap py  to  s ee in n ovatio n h ere , but I  also w i shIE w o ul d just auto-update 
a l r ea dy. :D
------ iL oc h 
Man I r ea lly  hat e whenthec re ator ofthe si t eex pects m eto scr ol l d own . I
h a ve a  1080p  monitor , ifI  can't see any content at th a th e ig h t Ihav e to
assume  the r e is n'ta ny .
~ ~~
ld h
Agr ee d .I t seems to be a des ig n tren d tha t's on the up swing late l y ,  and it' s
fr u st r ating. I encou ntere d a mobile site yes terda y that d id that.. . to me it 'sthe  eq uiv a l en t of the "cli c k  toen ter" ho mepage of  by gon e d ays .Uh, no
th anks.

~ ~~ 
j on es etc 
I ho n estly ca n' t t el l i f you r  guysare b eing  s er i ous . Click to e nter  w as 
abs urd  b ecaus e th e y w ere pag e loads j ust forth esake of  page loads.Sc rolling
do wn  is  justs p acing ou t your content to get a visualfee l. Th is o ne in
par tic ular i s g i ving a  short  expl an ati o n  to l e t  y oude cide if yo u wan t tosc roll  down f irst. There's no c o sthere, just th e c ourt e s yofn ot ove rw h elm i n g
anyone who is n't actual ly in terested i n  th edetails .

~~~iLoch I don't  have a p roblem wi th  the c onc ept if the  fact th at I have to sc r ol l isobv ious.Iope ned t hat pa g e,readthe ti tl e and"What  a m I doin g here again?"
I'm on a  Mac s o the re' s no scro llb a rs.  Do you j ustwant me to  gu ess  that 
th e re'ssome t hi ngd own t here ?  The leas t  y ouc a ndo is hinta t the  cont ent 
.

------
ozh
lots of_readability issues_on this page. Purple_tiny text_on_black background
!=_easy_to read.

------
abvdasker
Definitely going_to give this_a try. I really_appreciate the apparent
simplicity_and_creativity of this tool. It avoids the need to learn the odd
syntax of LESS/Sass_for_those of_us_who_need reliable cross-browser support
while providing_many (though not all) of_the benefits_of precompilers.

Seriously great work.

------
lstamour
Long-term I'm not sure how_well_this will work.

After_all, SCSS was based on "CSS3" so we wouldn't_have to rewrite our CSS.
It's still_around... so we_don't_have_to rewrite our SCSS.

I'm_happy to see innovation here, but_I also wish IE would just_auto-update
already. :D

------
iLoch
Man I really hate when the_creator of the site expects me_to scroll down. I
have a_1080p monitor,_if I can't see any_content at that_height I_have to
assume there_isn't any.

~~~
ldh
Agreed. It seems to be_a design trend_that's on the upswing lately, and_it's
frustrating._I encountered a_mobile_site_yesterday that_did that... to_me_it's
the equivalent_of_the "click to enter" home page_of_bygone days. Uh, no
thanks.

~~~
jonesetc
I honestly can't tell_if your guys are_being_serious. Click to enter_was
absurd because they were page_loads just for the sake of_page loads._Scrolling
down is_just spacing out your content to get a visual feel. This_one in
particular is giving a short_explanation to let you_decide if_you_want to
scroll down_first._There's no_cost here, just the courtesy of not_overwhelming
anyone who_isn't actually interested in the details.

~~~
iLoch
I_don't have a problem_with_the concept if the fact that_I have to scroll is
obvious. I_opened that page, read the_title_and_"What am I doing here_again?"
I'm on a Mac so there's_no scrollbars. Do_you just want me to guess that
there's_something_down there? The least you can_do_is hint at the content
