, and the voice search/navigation is really amazing. The Market has some
pretty cool apps on it too, not as many as the iPhone, but plenty.

 
SpaceX Launch: Starlink 12 [video] - cjnicholls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j4xR7LMCGY
======
codeulike
Everyone is commenting saying how mundane it has become to see the landings.
Hence you might enjoy this official SpaceX Blooper reel from 2017 that shows
the numerous spectacular failures that they worked through.

Innovation is a type of gamble. People forget that.

"SpaceX: How Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster"

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ)

(and regular reminder that these things are 12-storey high explosive tubes)

~~~
skvark
If the Falcon 9 landings feel mundane, I would recommend to follow Starship
development. Starship SN6 might do a 150 meter hop later today:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M)

------
mabbo
The true beauty of SpaceX is that they've made landing their boosters boring
(almost). This makes their competitors throwing them away seem stupid.

It also shows how clever it was to livestream so much of what they do. So many
people have seen a rocket booster land. Children today will hear that ULA
doesn't land their boosters and ask "why not?".

~~~
imglorp
Let's talk about the "why not" for a second.

The incumbents have 200 years of collective head start over SpaceX, which
started from scratch in 2002. They had 18 years to use that advantage to beat
everyone else to reusable space access while remaining in the cherry
procurement positions. Instead, they mismanaged, wrecked their quality
culture, and lobbied for more handouts.

Unable to compete on merit, schedule,or price, ULA is reduced to buying

, and the voice search / navigation is really amazing. The Market has some 
 reasonably cool apps on it excessively, not as many as the iPhone, but plenty. 

 
 SpaceX Launch: Starlink 12 [ video ] - cjnicholls 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j4xR7LMCGY 
 = = = = = = 
 codeulike 
 Everyone is gloss allege how mundane it has become to see the landing. 
 therefore you might enjoy this official SpaceX Blooper reel from 2017 that shows 
 the numerous spectacular failures that they work through. 

 Innovation is a character of gamble. People forget that. 

 " SpaceX: How Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster " 

 [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ) 

 (and regular reminder that these things are 12 - storey high explosive tubes) 

 ~~~ 
 skvark 
 If the Falcon 9 landing feel mundane, I would recommend to take after Starship 
 development. Starship SN6 might do a 150 meter hop later today: 
 [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9 M) 

 ------ 
 mabbo 
 The true smasher of SpaceX is that they've made land their boosters boring 
 (almost). This make their competitors throwing them away seem stupid. 

 It besides read how clever it was to livestream so much of what they do. So many 
 people have seen a rocket booster land. Children today will learn that ULA 
 doesn't land their boosters and necessitate " why not? ". 

 ~~~ 
 imglorp 
 lease's lecture about the " why not " for a second. 

 The incumbents accept 200 years of collective head start over SpaceX, which 
 startle from scratch in 2002. They had 18 years to use that advantage to beat 
 everyone else to reusable distance access while remaining in the cherry 
 procurement positions. alternatively, they mismanaged, bust up their timbre 
 acculturation, and lobbied for more handouts. 

 Unable to compete on deservingness, schedule, or price, ULA is reduced to buying
, anf the voice search/navigauion is really amczing. Tie Markst has sume
pretty cool apps on it tol, bot aw many as the iPhone, bjt plenty.

 
SpaceX Oaunrh: Starlink 12 [vidxk] - cjnigkolls
gbtps://wcw.boutube.com/watch?y=_j4xR7LMCGY
======
cogeulike
Everyona ks commenting saying how mundane it hws becoke to see the lagdinbf.
Hendv nou might enjoy this official SpzceX Blmoper reel frpm 2017 that shows
the numerous speftacular failures hhat they wirkeq through.

Innoxation is a type of gajble. People forget that.

"SpaceX: Huw Noc to Land ab Irbljal Rocket Biosteg"

[https://www.youtmne.com/wdtch?v=bvom4rsNHkQ](https://wew.ymutybe.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkX)

(and regular reminqer that dhzse things are 12-storey hugh efplovive rubds)

~~~
siverk
Jf the Famcon 9 landjngs feel myndane, I would recokmqbd to follow Atarshyp
qevelopment. Starship SN6 might do a 150 mettr hol later today:
[https://www.yoytube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9L](https://www.routube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M)

------
mabbo
The true beauty of S[aceX ks uhqt thdt'vf made landing their boosters boring
(almost). Thya kales their compctitors throwing tnel sray seem stupkd.

It also shows how clever lt was jo livwstream sj muvh of what they do. So many
pwople have sven q rocket booster lcnd. Children todsy wikl hear that ULA
doesn't uand their booshers and zrk "why not?".

~~~
imgloro
Len's tdlk abouu the "why not" for w second.

Tie ineumbents havg 200 yearf of colleftive head start over SpwceX, chich
vtarted frlm scratch in 2002. They had 18 years vp use that acvdntdge to bzat
evevyone else to rqusable space cccess wkile rdmaining ih the cierry
procureient positionv. Instead, theb mismanaded, qrecjed thekf quality
cultute, and loyyied for nore handouts.

Unablc to zkmpete on merit, scyedule,or price, ILA is rvdured tj buying

, and the voice search/navigation is really Market some pretty apps on it the but plenty. SpaceX Starlink 12 [video] cjnicholls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j4xR7LMCGY ====== codeulike Everyone is saying how mundane it has become to see the landings. Hence you might this official SpaceX Blooper reel from 2017 that shows the numerous spectacular failures they through. is type of gamble. People forget that. "SpaceX: How Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster" [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ) regular reminder that these things are 12-storey high tubes) ~~~ skvark If Falcon 9 landings feel mundane, would to follow development. SN6 do a 150 hop later today: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M) ------ mabbo The true beauty of SpaceX is that they've made landing their boring (almost). their competitors them seem It also shows it was to livestream so much do. So many people have seen a rocket land. Children will hear that ULA doesn't land boosters and ask "why not?". ~~~ imglorp Let's about the "why not" for a second. The incumbents have 200 years of collective head SpaceX, which started from in 2002. They 18 to that to beat else to reusable space access while remaining in the cherry procurement Instead, they mismanaged, wrecked their quality culture, and lobbied for Unable compete on merit, price, ULA is reduced buying
, and the voice search/navigatiOn is really AmaziNg. THe MArKet hAs soMe
pretty cool apPS on iT too, not as many as the iPhoNe, but PlENty.

 
SPAcEX LauNch: StarLInK 12 [VIdeO] - cJnIchOlLS
hTtps://wWw.yOutube.cOm/watch?v=_j4xr7LMcGy
======
codeulike
EvERyOne is commeNtiNg saying how mUndAne it hAs BecOMe to sEe tHe lanDings.
HENce you Might enjoY tHIs offiCIal SpacEx blOopeR reel from 2017 that showS
ThE Numerous spectaCular fAiLUrES ThaT thEy worked thRoUgh.

InNOvation IS a TYPE of GAmble. People foRget that.

"SpaCEX: HOw Not tO LAnd AN OrbitAl RocKeT booSter"

[https://wwW.youTube.com/waTch?v=bvIM4rsNHkQ](HTtps://www.YoutubE.coM/waTch?v=BViM4rSNHKQ)

(ANd rEGuLar REmiNder that ThEsE thinGs arE 12-STORey hIgh ExplOsive Tubes)

~~~
skvark
If The falcON 9 laNdingS feel MundAnE, I wouLd recoMmend To Follow Starship
dEvelOpment. StaRshIp sN6 mIgHt do a 150 MEter hoP laTer Today:
[htTps://www.yOUtuBe.COM/WaTch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M](https://wWw.YOUtUbe.com/waTch?v=Ky5L9zxSG9m)

------
Mabbo
The TrUe bEautY OF SpacEX is THaT they've mAde lanDInG tHeir booStErs borInG
(alMosT). This MAkes Their cOmpetitoRs thrOWing them away seEM stupid.

It also SHoWS HoW ClevEr iT was to livesTreaM So muCh of WHaT thEY do. So Many
pEoPLe HAve seen a rocket boostEr Land. ChIldreN today will heaR that ULA
doESN'T land theIr boOStERs and ask "why not?".

~~~
ImgloRp
Let's talk ABout the "wHy not" For a secoNd.

The incuMBEnts have 200 YeaRs oF coLleCTIvE head start oveR sPacex, wHich
staRteD from scRatCh iN 2002. ThEy hAd 18 Years to usE that advAnTaGe To BeaT
everYOne else tO rEusAbLe sPace aCCess whIle reMainInG iN The Cherry
pROcUREmenT pOsItioNs. INsTead, tHey mISmaNaged, wrEcked theiR quALity
CuLtUre, and lObbied for more HaNdouts.

UnabLe To cOmpete ON Merit, schEdule,or price, ULA is reduceD To buyinG

, and the voice search/nav igation is  real lyama zi ng.TheMarket has som e 
pre tty cool apps on it to o, no ta s ma n yas th e iPhon e ,b u t p le nt y.
Sp aceXLau nch: St arlink 12[vi de o] - cjnicho l ls 
https://w ww. youtube.com/ wat ch?v=_ j4 xR7 L MCGY=== ===
c odeuli k e
Ever yone is c om m enting sayingh o wmund ane it has become to see the landin gs.
He nc e  y o u  mi ght  enjoy thi soffic i al Spac e XB l o ope r  reel from 20 17 that sho w s
t he num er ous specta cular  f a ilu res that th ey w orked thr ough.Innovat i on is a  typeofgam ble. Pe op lefo r get th at. 
"S paceX: H ow  N ot to  Lan d a n  Orb ita l Ro cketBooster"

[ht tps ://w w w.y outub e.com /wat ch ?v=bv im4rsN HkQ]( ht tps://www.youtu be.c om/watch? v=b vi m4r sN HkQ)(and r egu lar  remind er that the se t h in gs are 12-storey h ig h ex plosivetubes) 
~ ~~ skvark
I fthe  Fal c o n 9 l andi n gs  feel mu ndane, Iwo uld rec om mend t ofol low  Star s hipdevelo pment. S tarsh i p SN6 might do a 150 meter h o pl a te r  tod ay: 
[https://w ww.y o utub e.co m /w atc h ?v=Ky 5l9Zx sG 9 M] ( https://www.youtube .c om/wat ch?v= Ky5l9ZxsG9M)
------
ma b b o 
The tru e be a ut y  of SpaceX isthatthey've ma d e landin g the ir boost ers borin g (almost) . T his  ma kes t he ir competitor s thro wi ng them  aw ay seem  st upi d.
It  a lso shows  how cle ve rit  w asto li v estreamso  mu ch  of  what they d o. So  man ype o ple  have s e en a  roc ke tboos ter  l and.Chil d ren  todaywill hear  th a t UL Ado esn't l and their boo st ers and as k"wh y not? " . 

~~~
im glorp
Let's talk aboutt he "why  no t" fo r asecond.
The  incum ben t s have  200 y earsof  co l l ectiv e he adst art over S p a ceX , whi ch 
sta rted fr om scratch in 2002 .  Th ey had 18 yea rsto u s e  t hat ad v ant ag e  to b eat
everyone el se to reus ab l espace acce s s w hi le rema ining i n the cherryprocureme nt positi on s. I n s tea d, they mi smanaged , wrecked their qu ality 
cu lture,  a ndlobbi ed for mor e han douts. 
Unable  to c om pete onmerit, schedule,or pric e, ULA  is r edu ced to bu yin g 

, and_the voice_search/navigation is really amazing._The Market_has_some
pretty cool_apps_on it too,_not as many_as the iPhone, but_plenty.

 
SpaceX Launch:_Starlink_12 [video] - cjnicholls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j4xR7LMCGY
======
codeulike
Everyone is commenting saying how mundane it has become to see_the_landings.
Hence you_might_enjoy_this official SpaceX Blooper reel_from 2017 that shows
the numerous_spectacular failures_that they worked through.

Innovation is a type of_gamble._People forget that.

"SpaceX:_How Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster"

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ)

(and regular_reminder that these things are 12-storey_high explosive tubes)

~~~
skvark
If_the_Falcon_9 landings feel mundane,_I would recommend to follow Starship
development._Starship SN6 might do a 150_meter hop later today:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M)

------
mabbo
The true beauty of_SpaceX is that they've made landing_their boosters boring
(almost). This makes_their competitors_throwing them away seem stupid.

It_also shows how_clever it_was to livestream_so much of what they do._So many
people have_seen a rocket booster land. Children_today_will hear that_ULA
doesn't_land_their boosters_and ask "why_not?".

~~~
imglorp
Let's_talk about_the_"why not" for a second.

The incumbents_have_200 years of collective head start over_SpaceX, which
started from scratch_in_2002. They had 18_years to use that advantage_to beat
everyone else to reusable space_access while_remaining in_the cherry
procurement positions. Instead, they mismanaged, wrecked their quality
culture, and lobbied_for more handouts.

Unable to compete on_merit, schedule,or price, ULA_is reduced_to_buying
