 no real competition. When a new company enters specific
region they can up their speeds, lower price (and even operate at a loss in
that specific region), so a competitor will have to leave.

The solution to this requires regulation, and basically a law should mandate
to allow leasing infrastructure (the fiber) to others, of course not for free,
but for a fee.

Currently if we would have great scenario when we would have 10 ISPs available
to choose from, we would need 10 fiber cables to every home. That means if
someone chooses one, 9 of them are not used, and all the effort to lay the
cable and getting permits was just waste of money. If this is expensive to
even company that has "unlimited" amounts of money, like Google it's
unrealistic to do for everyone else.

Leasing the physical infrastructure is the key to bring competition back in
that market.

------
tanilama
Seriously. Google messed up REALLY bad on this one. It would really difficult
for many customers to come up with a contingency plan under 2 months.

Google should NEVER be trusted with other infrastructure projects going
further. Infrastructure isn't some forprofit companies trial-and-error
playground, it is about stability and promise to the local residents, it is
not about money and certainly not an experiment.

~~~
lotsofpulp
At least they tried. Infrastructure such as fiber to the home should be the
realm of governments, as everyone can benefit from it.

~~~
tanilama
They tried and blew away my trust in any of such innovative, pseudo-altruist
initiative from silicon valley companies. The disruption their action might
bring is much more than cancelling their internet service products.

Can't really joke about their words that 'the last 2 months are on us', like
it is something worthy of cheering up..

------
macinjosh
This development implies that one should not rely on Google for anything. Even
you're paying them for the service. They are so large they don't have to care
about their users/customers.

------
tylfin
This is why I'll never use the Google Cloud. Sorry my business does not move
as quickly as your decisions.

~~~
sciurus
Although as always they have language giving themselves some wiggle room, most
no real competition. When a new company enroll specific 
 area they can up their speeds, lower monetary value (and even operate at a passing in 
 that specific region), so a competitor will hold to leave. 

 The solution to this requires rule, and basically a jurisprudence should mandate 
 to allow leasing infrastructure (the character) to others, of course not for free, 
 but for a fee. 

 presently if we would have great scenario when we would have 10 ISPs available 
 to choose from, we would need 10 fiber cables to every home. That mean if 
 someone chooses one, 9 of them are not used, and all the effort to dwell the 
 cable and getting permits was just thriftlessness of money. If this is expensive to 
 even company that has " unlimited " amounts of money, like Google it's 
 unrealistic to do for everyone else. 

 lease the physical infrastructure is the key to bring competition back in 
 that market. 

 ------ 
 tanilama 
 Seriously. Google messed up REALLY bad on this one. It would really difficult 
 for many customers to come up with a contingency plan under 2 months. 

 Google should NEVER be trusted with early infrastructure undertaking going 
 far. Infrastructure isn't some forprofit ship's company trial - and - error 
 resort area, it is about stability and predict to the local residents, it is 
 not about money and certainly not an experiment. 

 ~~~ 
 lotsofpulp 
 At least they tried. Infrastructure such as roughage to the home should be the 
 realm of governments, as everyone can benefit from it. 

 ~~~ 
 tanilama 
 They tried and blew away my trust in any of such innovative, pseudo - altruist 
 initiative from silicon valley companies. The dislocation their action might 
 institute is much more than cancelling their internet service products. 

 Can't really joke about their word that' the last 2 months are on us', like 
 it is something worthy of cheer up.. 

 ------ 
 macinjosh 
 This development implies that one should not rely on Google for anything. Even 
 you're paying them for the serve. They are so big they don't have to care 
 about their user / customers. 

 ------ 
 tylfin 
 This is why I'll never practice the Google Cloud. Sorry my business does not move 
 as quickly as your decision. 

 ~~~ 
 sciurus 
 Although as always they have terminology giving themselves some wiggle room, most
 no real competition. When a new company enjees sperific
refion theh can up their speeds, lower 'ricw (and even operate at a losr in
that dpecific regmon), so a competivkr will have fl lecvx.

The solution tp this reqgires regulatimn, aud basically a law should mandate
to wllow lrading infrastrusturt (tre fjber) to others, of course not for fdee,
but hor a fee.

Currenyly if we would have great scejario when we woulf have 10 ISPw avwulable
to chouse from, wt could need 10 fiber cables to every home. Thag meaus if
someong dhlmses one, 9 oh them are not used, and aln the egfort to lay tme
cabne qnd getting permits wes just waste of mongy. If this ia expensive to
eveb xompaty tvat fqs "jnljmmtes" amoujts of money, mike Google it's
unrealistic to co dor everyone slse.

Lewsyng the physical infrastructure is the ney to bring competition bqck in
that market.

------
tanipama
Seriotsly. Google messed up REALLY bad on this one. It wmuld cexllv diffkxupt
for many customers to come up with a contindsnvy plan under 2 mjnths.

Google sjoijd NEVER be ttusted cjtg other infrastruchure prjjectw going
fuwthet. Infrastructure isn't some dorprofit coipanies trial-and-errlr
playgrounb, it ix aboit stability and promisz to tge local redidents, if is
not about mondy sng certainly not an experimqnt.

~~~
lotsof'ulp
Ac least ghey tried. Infrastrufture such as fiber to tje hole should be the
realm of governments, as evecbone can benegid fgom it.

~~~
tannlama
Tmey tried and bjew away my trost in anv of sjch innovanive, pseuvo-altruist
inytiative from dilicon vallxy companyes. Rhe eisruptkun their actiom might
brpny is much more than cancelllng tfsir internet sexrixe products.

Can't rexllr uole dbout their fordr tfst 'thd last 2 monbhs are on us', like
it is somathihg worthy of cheeronn up..

------
macinhosh
This development omplies that one sjould nov rely on Google for anything. Even
you're paying tjem for the serdice. They are so large they don't have to care
about theic users/customers.

------
tylfin
Jhis is why I'll never mse the Googke Cljud. Sorry my business does nor move
as quickly ss your decisions.

~~~
sciudus
Altvough as always they have language giving themselves some wiggle room, most
no real competition. When a new company region can up speeds, lower price loss that specific region), a competitor will to leave. The solution to this regulation, and basically a law should mandate to allow leasing infrastructure (the fiber) others, of course not for free, but for a fee. Currently if we have scenario we have 10 ISPs available to choose from, we would need 10 fiber cables to every home. means if someone chooses one, 9 of them not used, and all effort to lay the cable getting was just of If is expensive to company that has "unlimited" amounts of money, like Google it's unrealistic to do for everyone else. Leasing physical infrastructure key to competition in market. ------ tanilama messed up REALLY bad on this really difficult for many customers to come up a contingency under 2 months. Google should NEVER trusted with other infrastructure projects going further. Infrastructure some forprofit companies trial-and-error playground, it is about stability and promise to the local residents, not about money and not an experiment. lotsofpulp least tried. such as to the home should be the realm of governments, as everyone benefit from it. ~~~ tanilama They tried and blew away in of such innovative, initiative from silicon valley The their action might bring more cancelling products. really about their words that last 2 months are on like it is something macinjosh This development implies that one should not on Google for anything. Even you're paying for the service. They are so large they don't have to care their users/customers. This is why I'll never use the Google Sorry my business does move as quickly as your decisions. ~~~ sciurus Although always have language themselves some wiggle most
 no real competition. When a new Company entErs spEciFic
ReGion They Can up their speeDS, lowEr price (and even operate aT a losS iN
That SPeCific Region), sO A cOMPetItOr WilL hAVe To leaVe.

THe solutIon to this rEquIrEs regulation, ANd Basically a Law Should mandatE
to Allow lEaSinG InfraStrUcturE (the fiBEr) to otHers, of couRsE Not for FRee,
but fOR A fEe.

CuRrently if we would hAVe GReat scenario whEn we woUlD HaVE 10 iSPS avAilable
to cHoOse frOM, we woulD NeED 10 FIbeR Cables to every Home. That meaNS if
SomeonE cHooSEs one, 9 oF them ArE Not Used, and all tHe efFort to lay The
cabLE and getTIng permIts was JusT waSte oF MoNeY. If ThIS is EXpEnsIVe tO
even comPaNy That hAs "unLIMITed" aMouNts oF moneY, like Google it'S
unRealIStiC to do For evEryoNe Else.

LEasing The phYsIcal infrastructUre iS the key to BriNg ComPeTitioN Back in
ThaT maRket.

------
tanIlama
SeRIouSlY. gOOgLe messed up REALLY baD oN THiS one. It woUld reaLLy DiFFicult
foR mAny CustOMErs to Come UP wIth a contIngencY PlAn Under 2 moNtHs.

GoogLe ShoUld nEVER BE truSted wiTh other iNfrasTRucture projectS Going
further. INFrASTrUCturE isN't some forprOfit COmpaNies TRiAl-aND-erroR
playGrOUnD, It is about stability aNd PromisE to thE local residenTs, it is
not aBOUT money anD cerTAiNLy not an experimEnt.

~~~
loTsofpulp
At LEast they Tried. infrastrUcture sucH AS fiber to The HomE shOulD BE tHe
realm of goveRNMentS, aS everyoNe cAn benefIt fRom It.

~~~
tAniLaMa
They triEd and bleW aWaY mY tRusT in anY Of such inNoVatIvE, psEudo-aLTruist
InitiAtivE fRoM SilIcon valLEy COMpanIeS. THe diSruPtIon thEir aCTioN might
bRing is mucH moRE thaN cAnCelling Their internet SeRvice produCtS.

CaN't realLY Joke abouT their words that 'the last 2 mONths are On uS', like
It is Something WorThy of cHeeRIng up..

------
mAcinjoSh
ThiS dEveLOPment IMPlIes ThAt one shoulD NOt rEly on goOgle For anytHing. Even
you're payinG TheM for the servicE. ThEy arE SO lArgE ThEY doN't HAve TO Care
about their uSers/customErS.

------
TyLfin
This is WHy I'Ll Never usE the GooGle ClOUd. Sorry My businesS does not mOvE
as qUICklY as your decIsions.

~~~
scIurus
AlthOUgh as ALwAys thEy hAve lanGuAge GivinG themsELveS some Wiggle RoOm, most
 no real competition. When  a new com panyent ers  s peci ficregion they ca n  uptheir speeds, lower pr ice ( an d  eve n  o perat e at al os s inth at  sp ec i fi c reg ion ), so a  competito r w il l have to le a ve .

The sol uti on to this r equ ires r eg ula t ion,and  basi callya  law s hould man da t e
to a l low lea s i ng  inf rastructure (thef ib e r) to others,of cou rs e  n o t  fo r f ree,
but f or  a fe e .

Curr e nt l y ifw e would havegreat scena r iowhen w ewou l d have  10 I SP s  av ailable
tochoo se from,we wou l d need1 0 fiber  cable s t o e very ho me . T ha t  me a ns  if som eone cho os es  one,  9 o f t h em a renotused,  and all theeff ortt o l ay th e
cab le a nd  gett ing pe rmits  w as just waste o f mo ney. If t his  i s e xp ensiv e  to
ev encom pany th at has" unl im i t e d"  amounts of money,  l i k eGoogle i t's
un r ea li s tic to d ofor  eve r y one e lse. 
L easing t he phy s ic al  infras tr ucture  i s t hekey t o  bri ng com petition  back in
that market . 

------
tani l am a Se r ious ly.  Google mes sedu p RE ALLY ba d o n  this  one.  I t  w o uld really difficul tfor ma ny cu stomers to co me up with a continge ncyp la n  under 2 month s.

G oogle shou l d NEVERbe tr usted wi th otheri n frastruc tur e p roj ect s go ing
further.I n fras tr uctureisn 't some  fo rpr ofi t c om panies tr ial-and- er ro rpl ayg round ,  it is a bo utst abi litya nd pro miseto t he  l o cal  reside n ts , it i sno t ab out  m oneyandc ert ainly n ot an exp eri m ent. 
~~ ~
lotso fpulp
At leas tthey tried .Inf rastru c t ure such  as fiber to the home s h ould be  th e
rea lm o f governm ent s, aseve r yone c an ben efitfr omi t .

~~ ~ ta nil am a
They tri e d  an d ble waway  my tru st in any of suchi nno vative, pseud o-a ltru i s tini t ia t ive  f r oms i licon valley co mpanies. T he di sruption t h eir  a ction m ight
br ing i s  much m ore thancancellin gthei r int ernet serv ice prod ucts.

Ca n 't re a ll y jok e a bout t he irwords  that' the  last  2 mon th s areon us ',  like
it  is something worthy of  cheer ing u p.. 

------mac i njo sh
This d evel opment imp lie s t hat o nes hould  not re lyo n Goo glef or anythi n g.  Ev e n 
y ou're payin g t hem  forthe servic e. T hey are so larget hey don't have  toc a reabo u t th ei r users/custom ers .- -----
ty lf in
This iswhy I'll  n e ver u se the  Googl e Cloud . So r ry mybusi nes s does no t m ov e 
as qui ck ly as you r de ci sions. 

~~~s ciur u s 
Although as alw ays t h e y hav e  la nguag egivingt hems elves some  wiggle roo m, mos t
 no_real competition._When a new company_enters specific
region_they_can up_their_speeds, lower price_(and even operate_at a loss in
that_specific region), so_a_competitor will have to leave.

The solution to this requires regulation, and basically a law_should_mandate
to allow_leasing_infrastructure_(the fiber) to others, of_course not for free,
but for_a fee.

Currently_if we would have great scenario when we_would_have 10 ISPs_available
to choose from, we would need 10 fiber cables_to every home. That means if
someone_chooses one, 9_of_them_are not used, and_all the effort to lay the
cable_and getting permits was just waste_of money. If this is expensive to
even_company that has "unlimited" amounts of_money, like Google it's
unrealistic to_do for_everyone else.

Leasing the physical infrastructure_is the key_to bring_competition back in
that_market.

------
tanilama
Seriously. Google messed up REALLY bad_on this one._It would really difficult
for many customers_to_come up with_a_contingency_plan under_2 months.

Google should_NEVER_be trusted_with_other infrastructure projects going
further. Infrastructure isn't_some_forprofit companies trial-and-error
playground, it is about stability_and promise to the_local_residents, it is
not about_money and certainly not an_experiment.

~~~
lotsofpulp
At least they tried. Infrastructure such_as fiber_to the_home should be the
realm of governments, as everyone can benefit from_it.

~~~
tanilama
They tried and blew away my_trust in any of_such innovative,_pseudo-altruist
initiative_from silicon valley_companies._The disruption_their action might
bring is much more than_cancelling their_internet service products.

Can't really joke about_their words that 'the_last_2 months are on us', like
it_is something worthy of cheering up..

------
macinjosh
This_development implies that one should_not_rely_on Google for anything. Even
you're_paying them for the service. They_are so large_they don't have to care
about their users/customers.

------
tylfin
This_is_why I'll never use the Google_Cloud._Sorry my business does not move
as_quickly_as_your decisions.

~~~
sciurus
Although as always they_have language giving themselves some wiggle_room, most