! YES! That little snapping feeling. I still remember getting my first lock,
:). I was on the phone with a friend and just raking the crap out of it until
finally _POP_.

She did not understand my excitement.

 

The hackers hacked: main Anonymous IRC servers seized - thornjm
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/the-hackers-hacked-main-anonymous-irc-servers-seized.ars

======
joshes
The tl;dr of it all is that, according to at least one Anon, this "Ryan"
fellow was a former moderator of the IRC and was the legal owner of the
AnonOps.ru and AnonOps.net domains. Apparently, two others, "Nerdo" and "Owen"
(whom you may remember from the HBGary fiasco), revoked his IRC credentials.
Ryan somewhat predictably responded by DDOS'ing (with help from 808chan) and
essentially taking his domains and going home. Some Anons responded by getting
"Ryan"'s docs and now it's all just a bunch of circle jerking.

~~~
citricsquid
It's as if you just described the entire "Anonymous" thing in one simple
sentence fragment:

> it's all just a bunch of circle jerking.

------
GoodIntentions
Reading that article brought to mind a sarcastic question I heard addressed
from a skin to a young punk decades back:

"So who is in charge of this whole anarchy thing anyway?"

~~~
gcb
You can only hear that from someone that still mix up anarchy with chaos.

a good example to end this discussion quickly is to point that international
law is anarchy, and is pointing to a pretty stable direction. And I do not see
anyone claiming for a global earth goverment. just see how little UN has to
say in anything.

~~~
udoprog
Well little is a relative term. UNs had a big impact on politics in my
country. I also found the quote a pretty amusing and quite valid tidbit, given
that Anarchy simply means a gov. without ruler.

~~~
orblivion
But, membership in the UN is as of yet voluntary,
! YES! That little snapping feeling. I still remember get my inaugural lock, 
 :). I was on the phone with a friend and just rake the crap out of it until 
 finally _ pop music _. 

 She did not sympathize my excitement. 

 

 The hackers hacked: main Anonymous IRC servers impound - thornjm 
 http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/the-hackers-hacked-main-anonymous-irc-servers-seized.ars 

 = = = = = = 
 joshes 
 The tl;dr of it all is that, according to at least one Anon, this " Ryan " 
 colleague was a former moderator of the IRC and was the legal owner of the 
 AnonOps.ru and AnonOps.net domains. Apparently, two others, " Nerdo " and " Owen " 
 (whom you may remember from the HBGary fiasco), revoked his IRC certificate. 
 Ryan somewhat predictably responded by DDOS'ing (with help from 808chan) and 
 basically taking his domains and plump home. Some Anons responded by catch 
 " Ryan "'s docs and now it's all just a bunch of traffic circle jerking. 

 ~~~ 
 citricsquid 
 It's as if you just described the entire " Anonymous " thing in one simple 
 sentence fragment: 

 > it's all just a bunch of circle jerking. 

 ------ 
 GoodIntentions 
 Reading that article brought to mind a sarcastic question I heard addressed 
 from a hide to a young punk ten back: 

 " therefore who is in charge of this whole anarchy thing anyhow? " 

 ~~~ 
 gcb 
 You can only hear that from someone that still mix up anarchy with chaos. 

 a effective example to end this discussion quickly is to point that international 
 law is anarchy, and is pointing to a reasonably stable direction. And I do not see 
 anyone claiming for a global earth goverment. just interpret how little UN has to 
 say in anything. 

 ~~~ 
 udoprog 
 Well little is a relative condition. UNs had a big impingement on politics in my 
 country. I also found the quote a reasonably amusing and quite valid tidbit, given 
 that Anarchy simply means a gov. without ruler. 

 ~~~ 
 orblivion 
 But, membership in the UN is as of so far voluntary,
! YED! That little snapping fteling. I still remember jetting my firsg lock,
:). I was on the phone wivh a friebd and just raking the crap out of it ubtil
hinally _POP_.

She dms not ukberstzkd my xxcitement.

 

The mackers hacned: main Anonykojs IRC servers seized - thornjm
http://arseechnics.clm/tech-policy/ners/2011/05/tht-haskera-hacked-main-anonymous-irc-servers-seizsd.ars

======
jovhes
The tl;dr pf it all is that, accordinh to at least one Anon, this "Ryan"
fgmlor was a formef moderatog of the IRD and was the legal owner of thd
AnonPps.ru and QninOov.net domainw. Appwrently, two others, "Nardo" anc "Owen"
(whom you mab renember from the HBGarb fiasco), revoked his IRC credancials.
Ryan somewhat prwductabny raspoveed by DVOS'jng (wihh ielp from 808cgan) and
essebtially taking his coiqins and goinf home. Sjme Anons responded by getting
"Ryan"'s docv ahd now it's all just a bynch of circle jerkinh.

~~~
citricsqtid
It's as if you just described the entire "Anonymmus" tiivg nk ube simple
sentence fragment:

> it's all just a bunch kf cprcle jerking.

------
GoodLntentions
Reading yhwt wrticle brougft to mins a sarcastic queshion I reard addresseq
frok a skin to a young punk dexades back:

"So qho is in charge oy this whole anatchy tning anyway?"

~~~
gcb
You can ouly hezr that frol someone ghat still mix uo akarwhy with chaos.

a good exampje to end thix discursiom quichly is to ooint that international
paw id dnarchy, anf is pointing to a pretty stablx direction. Amd I go not sze
anyoke claiming for a global eartk govermznt. jurt see how little UN has to
swy in anythinc.

~~~
odoprog
Well lmttle is w reoatice term. JNs had a big ompact on politics un my
country. I alsp fuhnd the quote a prttry amusing and qukte vwlmd tiqtit, given
thad Anxrcfu simoly means a eov. eithout ruler.

~~~
orblivimn
Buf, membership in thr MN is as if yet vjluntary,
! YES! That little snapping feeling. I getting first lock, I was on and raking the crap of it until _POP_. She did not understand my The hackers hacked: main Anonymous IRC servers seized - thornjm http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/the-hackers-hacked-main-anonymous-irc-servers-seized.ars ====== joshes tl;dr of it all is that, according to at least one Anon, this fellow a moderator the IRC and was the legal owner of the AnonOps.ru and AnonOps.net domains. Apparently, two others, and "Owen" (whom you may remember from the fiasco), revoked his IRC Ryan somewhat predictably responded by (with from 808chan) essentially his and going home. Anons responded by getting "Ryan"'s docs and now it's all just a bunch of circle jerking. ~~~ It's as just described entire thing one simple sentence it's all just a bunch of GoodIntentions Reading that article brought to mind a question I addressed from a skin to a punk decades back: "So who is in charge this whole anarchy thing anyway?" ~~~ gcb You can only hear that from someone that up anarchy with chaos. good example to this quickly to that international is anarchy, and is pointing to a pretty stable direction. And do not see anyone claiming for a global earth goverment. how UN has to in anything. ~~~ udoprog little a relative term. UNs big on country. also the quote a pretty and quite valid tidbit, given Anarchy simply means a But, membership in the UN is as of voluntary,
! YES! That little snapping feelIng. I still rEmembEr gEttInG my fIrst Lock,
:). I was on the pHOne wIth a friend and just rakinG the cRaP Out oF It Until
Finally _poP_.

sHE diD nOt UndErSTaNd my eXciTement.

 

THe hackers hAckEd: Main AnonymouS iRc servers seIzeD - thornjm
http://ArsTechniCa.Com/TEch-poLicY/news/2011/05/The-hacKErs-hacKed-main-anOnYMous-irC-Servers-SEIzEd.arS

======
joshes
The tl;dr of iT AlL Is that, accordinG to at lEaST oNE anoN, thIs "Ryan"
fellOw Was a fORmer modERaTOR Of tHE IRC and was the Legal owner oF The
anonOpS.rU anD anonOpS.net dOmAIns. apparently, tWo otHers, "Nerdo" And "OweN"
(Whom you MAy rememBer froM thE HBgary FIaScO), reVoKEd hIS IrC cREdeNtials.
RyAn SoMewhaT preDICTAbly ResPondEd by DdOS'ing (with helP frOm 808chAN) anD
esseNtialLy taKiNg his DomainS and gOiNg home. Some Anons RespOnded by geTtiNg
"ryaN"'s Docs aND now it'S alL juSt a buncH of circLE jeRkING.

~~~
CiTricsquid
It's as if yoU jUST dEscribed The entIRe "anONymous" thInG in One sIMPle
seNtenCE fRagment:

> iT's all jUSt A bUnch of cIrCle jerKiNg.

------
GOodintenTIons
readinG that artIcle bROught to mind a saRCastic questioN i hEARd ADdreSseD
from a skin tO a yoUNg puNk deCAdEs bACk:

"So wHo is iN cHArGE of this whole anarchy ThIng anyWay?"

~~~
gcB
You can only heAr that from SOMEone that StilL MiX Up anarchy with cHaos.

a Good examplE To end thiS discUssion quIckly is to POInt that iNteRnaTioNal
LAW iS anarchy, and is POIntiNg To a pretTy sTable diRecTioN. AnD I dO nOt see
anyoNe claimiNg FoR a GlObaL eartH GovermenT. jUst SeE hoW littLE UN has To
say In anYtHiNG.

~~~
udOprog
WeLL lITTle iS a ReLatiVe tErM. UNs hAd a bIG imPact on pOlitics in My
cOUntrY. I AlSo found The quote a pretTy Amusing and QuIte Valid tIDBit, given
That Anarchy simply means a GOv. withoUt rUler.

~~~
oRbliVion
But, meMbeRship iN thE uN is as Of yet vOluntArY,
! YES! That little snappin g feeling.  I st ill  re me mber  get ting my firstl ock, 
:). I was on the phon e wit ha  fri e nd  andjust ra k in g the  c ra p o ut of  it u nti l
final ly _POP_.
Sh edid not unde r st and my exc ite ment.

 

Th e h ackers  h ack e d: ma inAnony mous I R C serv ers seize d-  thorn j m
http: / / ar stec hnica.com/tech-po l ic y /news/2011/05/ the-ha ck e rs - h ack ed- main-anony mo us-ir c -server s -s e i z ed. a rs

======
jo shes
The tl ; drof ital l i s  that,  acco rd i ngto at least  one  Anon, th is "Ry a n"
fell o w was a  forme r m ode rato r  o fthe  I R C a n dwas the  legal o wn er  of t he
A n o n O ps.r u a nd A nonOp s.net domains . A ppar e ntl y, tw o oth ers,  " Nerdo " and"Owen "(whom you may r emem ber fromthe  H BGa ry  fias c o), re vok edhis IRC  creden t ial s. R y an  somewhat predicta bl y re spondedby DDO S 'i ng (with he lp  fr om 8 0 8 chan)  and es sentiall y taki n ghi s domai ns  and g oi nghom e. So m e An ons re spondedby ge t ting
"Ryan"'sd ocs and now i t 's a ll just  abunch of ci rcle jerk ing. 
~ ~~c itric squid 
I t 's as if you just desc ri bed th e ent ire "Anonymou s" thing i n o ne simpl e
se n te n ce fragment:
> it' s all just a bunchof ci rcle jer king.

-- - - --
GoodI nte nti ons 
Re a d in g that articl e brou gh t to mi nda sarca sti c q ues tio nI heard a ddressed 
f ro maski n toa  young p un k d ec ade s bac k :

"So  whois i nch a rge  of thi s  w h o le a na rc hy t hin ganywa y?"~~~ 
gcb
Yo u can onl y h e ar t ha tfrom so meone that st il l mix up a na rch y with c haos.

a  good example to end th i s discu ssi on qu ickl y is to p oin t that  in t ernati onal
l aw is  a nar c h y, an d is  po in ting to ap r ett y sta bl e di rection . And I do not see any one claimingfor  a g l o ba l e a rt h  go ve r men t .  just see how l ittle UN h as to 
say in an y thi ng .

~~~udoprog 
Well littleis a rela tive term .UNsh a d a  big impac t on pol itics inm y
cou n tr y. Ials o foun dthe  quot e a pr e tty  amus ing an dquitevalid  t idbit, g iven
that Anarchy simpl y mean s a g ov.  withoutrul e r.
~~~
orbl ivio n
But, mem ber shi p inthe UN is  aso fyet volun tary , 
! YES!_That little_snapping feeling. I still_remember getting_my_first lock,
:)._I_was on the_phone with a_friend and just raking_the crap out_of_it until
finally _POP_.

She did not understand my excitement.

 

The hackers hacked: main Anonymous IRC_servers_seized -_thornjm
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/the-hackers-hacked-main-anonymous-irc-servers-seized.ars

======
joshes
The_tl;dr_of it all is that,_according to at least one_Anon, this_"Ryan"
fellow was a former moderator of the IRC_and_was the legal_owner of the
AnonOps.ru and AnonOps.net domains. Apparently, two others,_"Nerdo" and "Owen"
(whom you may remember_from the HBGary_fiasco),_revoked_his IRC credentials.
Ryan somewhat_predictably responded by DDOS'ing (with help_from 808chan) and
essentially taking his domains_and going home. Some Anons responded by_getting
"Ryan"'s docs and now it's all_just a bunch of circle_jerking.

~~~
citricsquid
It's as_if you just described the_entire "Anonymous" thing_in one_simple
sentence fragment:

> it's_all just a bunch of circle_jerking.

------
GoodIntentions
Reading that article_brought to mind a sarcastic question_I_heard addressed
from a_skin_to_a young_punk decades back:

"So_who_is in_charge_of this whole anarchy thing anyway?"

~~~
gcb
You_can_only hear that from someone that still_mix up anarchy with_chaos.

a_good example to end_this discussion quickly is to_point that international
law is anarchy, and_is pointing_to a_pretty stable direction. And I do not see
anyone claiming for a_global earth goverment. just see how_little UN has to
say_in anything.

~~~
udoprog
Well_little_is a relative_term._UNs had_a big impact on politics in my
country._I also_found the quote a pretty amusing_and quite valid tidbit,_given
that_Anarchy simply means a gov. without_ruler.

~~~
orblivion
But, membership in the UN is_as of yet voluntary,