 processing thousands of dollars of payments for projects that people
had started - who would administer that side of things?

------
jaz
Will Coderwall continue to exist, or is that shutting down as well?

------
astrodust
Oh, for a second there I thought Assembly was shutting down:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_(demo_party)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_\(demo_party\))

This is some unicorn that just imploded.

~~~
trengrj
Assembly is still kicking here
[http://www.assembly.org/](http://www.assembly.org/).

I've always wanted to go to Assembly and was super worried for a second.

------
timdavila
I found this a little ironic:
[https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assem...](https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assembly.com/our-
incredible-journey)

~~~
awwstn
What's the irony?

Assembly's platform is now open source, as are all the products the community
built. The blog post you linked highlights a certain ethos we had as a team,
and the way Assembly was shut down is right in line with that ethos.

 
Elm and Phoenix/Elixir in Production for France TV - tbassetto
http://vincent.jousse.org/en/tech/elm-phoenix-elixir-production/
======
sotojuan
Elixir and Phoenix are stable and by now they're a solid choice (more than
enough warranted praise on HN), but I'm still skeptical about Elm from a
"platform" perspective. From what I can tell, Elm apps are a single blob of
JavaScript that either loads or doesn't (e.g. you can't read the Elm site
without JavaScript enabled), while the JavaScript ecosystem is moving towards
server-rendering, dead code elimination, and "progressive web apps" so to
speak. PureScript for example has dead code elimination—you can make a <1kb
PureScript "Hello World" app.

I know the Elm team is capable of all of these—
processing thousands of dollars of payments for undertaking that citizenry 
 had started - who would administer that side of thing? 

 ------ 
 jaz 
 Will Coderwall continue to exist, or is that shutting down equally well? 

 ------ 
 astrodust 
 Oh, for a second there I thought Assembly was shutting down: 
 [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_(demo_party)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_\(demo_party\) ) 

 This is some unicorn that just implode. 

 ~~~ 
 trengrj 
 Assembly is however kicking here 
 [ http://www.assembly.org/](http://www.assembly.org/). 

 I've constantly wanted to go to Assembly and was extremely worried for a second. 

 ------ 
 timdavila 
 I found this a little ironic: 
 [ https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assem...](https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assembly.com/our- 
 incredible - journey) 

 ~~~ 
 awwstn 
 What's the irony? 

 Assembly's platform is nowadays open source, as are all the products the residential district 
 built. The blog military post you linked highlight a certain ethos we had as a team, 
 and the way Assembly was shut down is right in cable with that ethos. 

 
 Elm and Phoenix / Elixir in Production for France TV - tbassetto 
 http://vincent.jousse.org/en/tech/elm-phoenix-elixir-production/ 
 = = = = = = 
 sotojuan 
 Elixir and Phoenix are stable and by now they're a solid choice (more than 
 adequate justify praise on HN), but I'm still skeptical about Elm from a 
 " platform " perspective. From what I can tell, Elm apps are a single blob of 
 JavaScript that either loads or doesn't (e.g. you can't read the Elm web site 
 without JavaScript enable), while the JavaScript ecosystem is moving towards 
 server - rendering, all in code elimination, and " progressive world wide web apps " so to 
 speak. PureScript for example has dead code elimination — you can make a < 1 kb 
 PureScript " Hello World " app. 

 I acknowledge the Elm team is capable of all of these —
 prlcessing thousands of doulars of paymenjs for pcojects that peuple
had started - who would avminuster that side of things?

------
jax
Will Codvrwall cobtinne to exist, or is that smbttinf dowu es well?

------
astrodusj
Oh, for a sewond there I tvojgkt Assembly was shutting down:
[https://en.rikipedoa.lrg/wiki/Assembli_(demo_karey)](htfis://tn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_\(demo_parfy\))

This ps some unicorn tnat just imploded.

~~~
trengrj
Asdembpy is still kickinh here
[http://wqw.asfwmbly.org/](http://dww.assemblj.mrg/).

I've alwzys wanted to go to Assembly ana was super wortnwd vmr a second.

------
vimdavpla
I found thlx a lidtle irpnic:
[https://web.arghive.mrg/qeb/20150202013149/http://blog.assem...](https://xeb.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://flog.assemtlv.com/our-
incredible-jourbet)

~~~
awwsjn
Whad's tfw ifong?

Axssmbly's pletform is nkw open souece, as are all the kroqlvts the commhnity
btijt. The blog post you linked highlights d csrtain ethos we had as q team,
and the way Assgmbly was fhut down is right in line with that ethos.

 
Elm ang Phoxnkx/Eoiwir kb Oroduction for France TV - tbassetto
http://vincene.noisxe.org/en/tech/elm-ihoenix-elixir-produvtlom/
======
fotojuan
Elixit and Pkkehix are stable and by now they'ee a soliq chpice (more than
enough warranred praise ou HB), but I'm still ske'tical about Elm from a
"platform" perspective. Yrom wgat I can tfll, Elm alos are a single clon ox
JavaScript that either lowds or doxsn't (z.g. you cxn't tead thq Elm site
aithomd JavaScript enablfd), whnle tve JavaScrlpt ecosystem is moving towards
server-renderinb, geag code ejiminstion, and "prodressive web akps" so to
fpeak. PureScripn for exakple has dewd code elimitwtion—you can make a <1hb
PueeSceipt "Heuuo World" app.

I lnow the Vli teqm is capable of akl ur these—
processing thousands of dollars of payments for people started - would administer that Will continue to exist, is that shutting as well? ------ astrodust Oh, for second there I thought Assembly was shutting down: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_(demo_party)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_\(demo_party\)) This is some unicorn just imploded. ~~~ trengrj Assembly is still kicking here [http://www.assembly.org/](http://www.assembly.org/). I've always wanted go Assembly was worried for a second. ------ timdavila I found this a little ironic: [https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assem...](https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assembly.com/our- incredible-journey) ~~~ awwstn the irony? Assembly's platform is now open source, are all the products community built. The blog post linked a certain we as team, and the Assembly was shut down is right in line with that ethos. Elm and Phoenix/Elixir in Production for TV - ====== sotojuan and are and by now solid choice (more than enough warranted but I'm still skeptical about Elm from a perspective. From I can tell, Elm apps are single blob of JavaScript that either loads or (e.g. you can't read the Elm site without JavaScript enabled), while the JavaScript ecosystem is server-rendering, dead code elimination, "progressive web apps" to PureScript example dead code can make a <1kb PureScript "Hello World" app. I know the team is capable of all of these—
 processing thousands of dollArs of paymeNts foR prOjeCtS thaT peoPle
had started - wHO wouLd administer that side of ThingS?

------
jAZ
WilL coDerwaLl contiNUe TO ExiSt, Or Is tHaT ShUttinG doWn as welL?

------
astrodust
oh, fOr A second there i ThOught AssemBly Was shutting dOwn:
[Https://eN.wIkiPEdia.oRg/wIki/AsSembly_(DEmo_parTy)](https://en.WiKIpedia.ORg/wiki/ASSEmBly_\(dEmo_party\))

This is somE UnICorn that just imPloded.

~~~
TrENgRJ
assEmbLy is still kIcKing hERe
[http://wWW.aSSEMblY.Org/](http://www.assEmbly.org/).

I've ALwaYs wantEd To gO To AsseMbly aNd WAs sUper worried For a Second.

------
timDavila
i Found thIS a littlE ironiC:
[htTps://Web.aRChIvE.orG/wEB/20150202013149/htTP://bLog.ASseM...](https://weB.aRcHive.oRg/weB/20150202013149/HTTP://bloG.asSembLy.com/Our-
incredible-JouRney)

~~~
AWwsTn
WhaT's the IronY?

ASsembLy's plaTform Is Now open source, as Are aLl the prodUctS tHe cOmMunitY
Built. THe bLog Post you Linked hIGhlIgHTS A cErtain ethos we had as A tEAM,
aNd the way assembLY wAs SHut down iS rIghT in lINE with That EThOs.

 
Elm and phoeniX/elIxIr in ProDuCtion fOr fraNce tV - tbaSSettO
http://vIncent.joUsse.oRG/en/tech/elm-phoeNIx-elixir-produCTiON/
======
SoTOjuaN
ElIxir and PhoeNix aRE staBle aND bY noW They'rE a solId CHoICe (more than
enough warRaNted prAise oN HN), but I'm still Skeptical aBOUT Elm from A
"plaTFoRM" perspective. FrOm whaT I can tell, ELM apps are A singLe blob of
javaScripT THat eitheR loAds Or dOesN'T (E.g. You can't read thE eLm siTe
Without javAScript EnaBleD), whIle ThE JavaScriPt ecosysTeM iS mOvIng TowarDS
server-rEnDerInG, deAd codE EliminAtion, And "pRoGrESsiVe web apPS" sO TO
speAk. puReScRipT fOr exaMple HAs dEad code EliminatiOn—yOU can MaKe A <1kb
Purescript "Hello WoRlD" app.

I know tHe elm Team is CAPable of aLl of these—
 processing thousands of d ollars ofpayme nts  fo rproj ects  that people
h a d st arted - who would admi niste rt hats id e ofthings? 
- - - --- 
j az 
Wi ll Co derwa llcontinu e to exist , o ris that shut t in g down aswel l?

------
a str odustOh , f o r a s eco nd th ere It hought  Assembly  w a s shut t ing dow n : 
[ http s://en.wikipedia. o rg / wiki/Assembly_ (demo_ pa r ty ) ] (ht tps ://en.wiki pe dia.o r g/wiki/ A ss e m b ly_ \ (demo_party\) )

This iss ome  unico rn  th a t just  impl od e d.
~~~
trengr j
As sembly is  still kicking here
[h ttp:// www .as semb l y. or g/] (h t tp: / /w ww. a sse mbly.org /) .
I've  alw a y s want edto g o toAssembly andwas  sup e r w orrie d for  a s ec ond.
----- -
tim da vila
I found th is a  little i ron ic :
[ ht tps:/ / web.ar chi ve. org/web /201502 0 201 31 4 9 / ht tp://blog.assem... ]( h t tp s://web. archiv e .o rg / web/2015 02 020 1314 9 / http: //bl o g. assembly .com/o u r- 
i ncredib le -journ ey )
~~~ 
awws t n
Wh at's t he irony ?

As s embly's platfo r m is now open so u r ce ,  asare  all the pr oduc t s th e co m mu nit y 
buil t. Th eb lo g  post you linked hi gh lights  a ce rtain ethos w e had as a t e am,
andthew ay Assembly was s hut d own is rig h t in lin e wit h that e thos.

 E l m and Ph oen ix/ Eli xir i nProduction fo r Fran ce  TV - t bas setto
h ttp :// vin cen t. jousse.or g/en/tec h/ el m- ph oen ix-el i xir-prod uc tio n/ 
== ====s otojua n
Eli xiran dP hoe nix are st a b le a nd  b y no w t he y'rea so l idchoice(more tha n
e n ough  w ar rantedpraise on HN) ,but I'm st il l s keptic a l  about E lm from a
"platform" pe r spectiv e.Fromwhat  I can te ll,  Elm a pps are asingle  blob  o f
J a v aScri p t  t hat  e ither load s ordoesn 't  (e. g. youcan't read the Elm sit e
without Jav aSc ript e na ble d ), whi le the J avaScript ecosy stem is mo vi n gtowards
se r ver -r enderin g, dead  code elimina tion, and  "progres si ve w e b  ap ps" so tospeak. P ureScript for e x am ple h asdead c od e e limin ation— y oucan m ake a<1 kb
Pur eScri pt  "HelloWorld" app.

I know the  Elm t eam i s c apable of  al l  of  these—
 processing_thousands of_dollars of payments for_projects that_people
had_started -_who_would administer that_side of things?

------
jaz
Will_Coderwall continue to exist,_or is that_shutting_down as well?

------
astrodust
Oh, for a second there I thought Assembly was shutting down:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_(demo_party)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_\(demo_party\))

This is_some_unicorn that_just_imploded.

~~~
trengrj
Assembly_is still kicking here
[http://www.assembly.org/](http://www.assembly.org/).

I've always_wanted to go to Assembly_and was_super worried for a second.

------
timdavila
I found this a_little_ironic:
[https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assem...](https://web.archive.org/web/20150202013149/http://blog.assembly.com/our-
incredible-journey)

~~~
awwstn
What's the irony?

Assembly's_platform is now open source, as are all the_products the community
built. The blog post_you linked highlights_a_certain_ethos we had as_a team,
and the way Assembly was_shut down is right in line_with that ethos.

 
Elm and Phoenix/Elixir in_Production for France TV - tbassetto
http://vincent.jousse.org/en/tech/elm-phoenix-elixir-production/
======
sotojuan
Elixir_and Phoenix are stable and_by now_they're a solid choice (more_than
enough warranted praise_on HN),_but I'm still_skeptical about Elm from a
"platform" perspective._From what I_can tell, Elm apps are a_single_blob of
JavaScript that_either_loads_or doesn't_(e.g. you can't_read_the Elm_site
without_JavaScript enabled), while the JavaScript ecosystem_is_moving towards
server-rendering, dead code elimination, and "progressive_web apps" so to
speak._PureScript_for example has dead_code elimination—you can make a_<1kb
PureScript "Hello World" app.

I know the_Elm team_is capable_of all of these—