 whenever you want. Additionally
if you’re ok with DRM iTunes has most stuff.

Useful tip for finding which streaming service a film is on: google “film name
streaming” and google lists the answers in a box at the top of the results.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
The problem with recommending that people buy the DVD/Blu-Ray is that the
agreed-upon canon of great films stretches into the many hundreds of titles
(Ebert’s list at 364 titles is only an abridged canon.) Therefore, for someone
seeking a cultural education, buying the physical releases would run into the
thousands and thousands of dollars. It would be a challenge even for North
Americans or Western Europeans to amass a suitable collection, let alone
people in lower-income countries. Consequently, a person can only
realistically learn about great cinema by streaming from multiple subscription
sites, or torrenting, and people disappointed by the former ought to remember
that the latter exists.

~~~
dfxm12
You can sub to one streaming service and never run out of great films to watch
(in part _because_ titles rotate, not in spite of, but that's beside the
point). Justifying piracy because, for example, you're disappointed that
Netflix is missing one great film, is disingenuous.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
You misunderstand my point. It’s not that a person might be looking just for
"great films to watch", in which case any streaming site might satisfy them.
It is that a person might be looking for _the_ great films, that entire canon
of films which scholars hold to be important. Netflix is never going to have
them all regardless of how much they rotate.

~~~
dfxm12
That doesn't really affect my point. No streaming service will meet your
unreasonable demands (for many reasons, first of all is that there is not an
objectively agreed upon list of _the_ great films), and therefore justifying
piracy because of it is disingenuous.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
That a service should have it all is not an unreasonable demand, and it is
peculiar that you chide someone for "justifying piracy". After all, the HN
crowd is generally very sympathetic to Library Genesis, which is aiming to
gradually
whenever you want. Additionally 
 if you ’re ok with DRM iTunes has most stuff. 

 utilitarian peak for finding which streaming servicing a movie is on: google “ film name 
 streaming ” and google lists the answer in a box at the top of the consequence. 

 ~~~ 
 Mediterraneo10 
 The problem with recommending that multitude buy the DVD / Blu - Ray is that the 
 agreed - upon canyon of great films stretches into the many hundreds of titles 
 (Ebert ’s list at 364 titles is merely an abridged canon .) Therefore, for someone 
 seeking a cultural department of education, buying the physical release would move into the 
 thousands and thousand of dollars. It would be a challenge even for North 
 Americans or Western Europeans to amass a suitable solicitation, let alone 
 people in lower - income countries. Consequently, a person can only 
 realistically learn about great cinema by streaming from multiple subscription 
 sites, or torrenting, and people disappointed by the former ought to remember 
 that the latter exists. 

 ~~~ 
 dfxm12 
 You can sub to one cyclosis military service and never run out of big films to watch 
 (in part _ because _ titles revolve, not in spite of, but that's beside the 
 point). Justifying piracy because, for case, you're disappointed that 
 Netflix is missing one great film, is disingenuous. 

 ~~~ 
 Mediterraneo10 
 You misunderstand my point. It ’s not that a person might be look just for 
 " great films to watch ", in which case any streaming web site might meet them. 
 It is that a person might be look for _ the _ great films, that entire canyon 
 of films which scholars hold to be important. Netflix is never going to have 
 them all regardless of how much they rotate. 

 ~~~ 
 dfxm12 
 That doesn't really affect my compass point. No streaming servicing will meet your 
 excessive demands (for many reasons, first of all is that there is not an 
 objectively agree upon list of _ the _ big films), and therefore absolve 
 piracy because of it is disingenuous. 

 ~~~ 
 Mediterraneo10 
 That a military service should have it all is not an excessive demand, and it is 
 peculiar that you chide someone for " justifying plagiarism ". After all, the HN 
 crowd is generally very sympathetic to Library Genesis, which is aim to 
 gradually
 whfnever you want. Additionxlly
if you’re ok with DCM iTunss has must stuff.

Useful tip for findmng qhich streaming service a fklm is on: google “dilm bame
streammhg” and njogls liscs the answers ik a box at dhe top of the rdsblts.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
The problem with recjmmendimg that people boy tht DDD/Blh-Gan is that the
agreed-upon canon of great hilms stretches into the many hundreds of titpes
(Ebert’s list at 364 titles is inly qn abridged zanon.) Thertfmre, for sojeone
seeking a cultural educatiun, buving the phisjcwn releases xould gun into the
tmpusandv and tnousands of doklacs. Ir would be a challengx even for North
Amerycans or Featern Europeans ti qmass a sgitacoe zolmertikn, let alkne
people jn lower-incime countries. Conseauqbtly, a person can oglr
realistically learn about great cinema by streaming from multiplw subscription
sites, ot torrentigg, and people disappointed by the former ought to remejcer
uhqt thd lwtter exists.

~~~
dfxm12
You can sub to one streaming fsrfibe and never run jut of greay vikis to watch
(in part _ysczuse_ titles rotate, not in spitw of, but uhat's beside the
point). Justifying piracy becalse, dor example, you're bisappointed thaj
Netflox is missing one great filj, is disingfnuous.

~~~
Medjgerraneo10
You misuvdegstatd my point. It’s not that a person mmght ye lookivg jost for
"dreat filmd to watch", in which case any dtseaming sihe might satisfy them.
It is that a person mighj ba lmoking fjr _thc_ great films, trat entire canpn
of fijms wfich scholzrs holv to be impowtant. Netflix ls never goiig to havq
then alo regarauess of how muvh they rotate.

~~~
dfxm12
Tyat doesn't really effezf my point. No scxeqming service woll meqt ypuw
gnreasonable demxndr (for oany reasonw, firxt of all is that thare js not an
objectiveky agreed opon list of _the_ great films), and therefoge juvtihying
porasy because of it is disingenuohs.

~~~
Mediterganco10
That a servyce whould have nt all is not an unreasonable demand, and it is
peculiar thar you chide someone nor "justifyiig pirwcy". After all, the HN
crowd is tenerally very sykpathetic to Library Fenesiv, whifh is aiming to
gradually
whenever you want. Additionally if you’re ok iTunes most stuff. tip for finding is google “film name and google lists answers in a box at the of the results. ~~~ Mediterraneo10 The problem with recommending that people buy the is that the agreed-upon canon of great films stretches into the many hundreds titles list 364 is only an abridged canon.) Therefore, for someone seeking a cultural education, buying the physical releases run into the thousands and thousands of dollars. would be a challenge for North Americans or Western to a suitable let people lower-income countries. Consequently, person can only realistically learn about great cinema by streaming from multiple subscription sites, or torrenting, and disappointed by ought to that latter ~~~ dfxm12 You to one streaming service and never great films to watch (in part _because_ titles not in of, but that's beside the point). piracy because, for example, you're disappointed that Netflix missing one great film, is disingenuous. ~~~ Mediterraneo10 You misunderstand my point. It’s not that might be looking just "great films to in case streaming might satisfy It is that a person might be looking for _the_ great that entire canon of films which scholars hold to be is going to have all regardless of how they ~~~ dfxm12 That doesn't my No meet unreasonable (for many reasons, first all is that there is an objectively agreed upon and therefore justifying piracy because of it is ~~~ Mediterraneo10 That a service should have all is not an unreasonable demand, and it is peculiar that you someone for After all, the HN crowd is generally very to Library Genesis, which aiming to gradually
 whenever you want. AdditionalLy
if you’re oK with dRM ITuNeS has Most Stuff.

Useful tip FOr fiNding which streaming serVice a FiLM is oN: GoOgle “fIlm name
STrEAMinG” aNd GooGlE LiSts thE anSwers in A box at the tOp oF tHe results.

~~~
MedITeRraneo10
The pRobLem with recomMenDing thAt PeoPLe buy The dVD/BlU-Ray is THat the
Agreed-upoN cANon of gREat filmS STrEtchEs into the many hundREdS Of titles
(Ebert’s List at 364 TiTLeS IS onLy aN abridged cAnOn.) TheREfore, foR SoMEONe
sEEking a culturaL education, bUYinG the phYsIcaL ReleasEs wouLd RUn iNto the
thousAnds And thousaNds of dOLlars. It WOuld be a ChalleNge EveN for nOrTh
ameRiCAns OR WEstERn EUropeans To AmAss a sUitaBLE COlleCtiOn, leT alonE
people in loweR-inCome COunTries. conseQuenTlY, a perSon can Only
rEaListically learn AbouT great cinEma By StrEaMing fROm multIplE suBscriptIon
siteS, Or tOrRENTiNg, and people disappoInTED bY the formEr oughT To ReMEmber
thaT tHe lAtteR EXists.

~~~
Dfxm12
yOu Can sub to One strEAmInG servicE aNd neveR rUn oUt oF greaT FilmS to watCh
(in part _BecauSE_ titles rotate, nOT in spite of, but THaT'S BeSIde tHe
pOint). JustifyIng pIRacy BecaUSe, For EXamplE, you'rE dISaPPointed that
Netflix iS mIssing One grEat film, is disiNgenuous.

~~~
MeDITErraneo10
YOu miSUnDErstand my point. it’s noT that a persON might be LookiNg just foR
"great filMS To watch", iN whIch CasE anY STrEaming site migHT SatiSfY them.
It Is tHat a perSon MigHt bE loOkIng for _the_ Great filMs, ThAt EnTirE canoN
Of films wHiCh sChOlaRs holD To be imPortaNt. NeTfLiX Is nEver goiNG tO HAve
tHeM aLl reGarDlEss of How mUCh tHey rotaTe.

~~~
dfxm12
ThaT doESn't rEaLlY affect My point. No streAmIng service WiLl mEet youR
UNreasonaBle demands (for many reasonS, First of All Is thaT theRe is not an
ObjEctiveLy aGReed upOn list Of _the_ GrEat FILms), anD THeRefOrE justifyinG
PIraCy becAuSe of It is disIngenuous.

~~~
MediterraNEo10
THat a service shOulD havE IT aLl iS NoT An uNrEAsoNABle demand, and it iS
peculiar tHaT YoU chide someONe fOr "JustifyIng piraCy". AftER all, the hN
crowd is Generally VeRy syMPAthEtic to LibrAry GenesIs, which is AIming TO
gRaduaLly
 whenever you want. Additi onally
ifyou’r e o k w it h DR M iT unes has mosts tuff .

Useful tip for find ing w hi c h st r ea mingservice af i lmis  o n:go o gl e “fi lmname
st reaming” a ndgo ogle lists t h eanswers in  abox at the t opof the  r esu l ts.
~~~ 
Medi terran e o10
Th e problem  w i th rec o mmendin g th at p eople buy the DVD / Bl u -Ray is that t he
agr ee d -u p o n c ano n of great  f ilmss tretche s  i n t o  th e  many hundred s of titles (Eb ert’sli sta t 364title si s o nly an abri dged  canon.)Theref o re, for someone 
seeki nga c ultu r al  e duc at i on, bu yin g  th e physic al  r eleas es w o u l d  run  in to t he
th ousands and t hou sand s  of  doll ars.It w ou ld be  a cha lleng eeven for NorthAmer icans orWes te rnEu ropea n s to a mas s a  suitab le coll e cti on , l et  alone
people in l ow e r -i ncome co untrie s .Co n sequentl y,  apers o n  canonly re alistica lly le a rn  a bout gr ea t cine ma  by  st reami n g fr om mul tiple su bscri p tion
sites, or torrenting, a n dp e op l e di sap pointed bythef orme r ou g ht  to remem ber
t ha t  t h e latter exists.

~ ~~ 
dfxm1 2
You  can sub to o ne streami n g serviceandn ev e r run out of g reatfilms to w a tch
(inpart_because _ titlesr o tate, no t i n s pit e o f ,  b ut that's bes i d e th epoint).  Ju stifyin g p ira cybec au se, for e xample,yo u' re  d isa ppoin t ed thatNe tfl ix  is  miss i ng one  grea t fi lm ,i s d isingen u ou s . 

~~ ~Me dite rra ne o10
Y ou m i sun derstan d my poin t.I t’sno tthat aperson mightbe  looking j us t f or
"gr e a t filmsto watch", in which cas e  any st rea mingsite  might sa tis fy the m.I t is t hat aperso nmig h t  be l o o ki ngfo r _the_ gr e a t f ilms,  t hatentirecanon
of films whi c h s cholars holdtobe i m p or tan t .N etf li x  is n ever going to h ave
them a ll re gardless o f  ho wmuch th ey rota te.
~ ~~
dfxm 12
That d oesn't re al ly a f f ect  my point.  No stre aming ser v ice w i ll  meet  yo ur
unr ea son abledemand s  (f or ma ny rea so ns, fi rst o fall is t hat there is not an
obj ective ly ag ree d upon li sto f _ the_ grea t fi lms), andthe ref ore j ust i fying 
pir a cy  be c auseof i t  is disin g en uou s . 
~~~
Mediter r a n eo1 0
Tha t a servic e sh ould have it alli s not an unrea sona b l e d ema n d, a nd  it is
peculia r t ha t you chid esomeone for  "justif yi n g pir acy".Afterall, th e HN crowdis g ene rally ver y s ym p athetic  t oL ibrary  Gen es is, wh ich is aimi n g  to
gradually
 whenever_you want._Additionally
if you’re ok with_DRM iTunes_has_most stuff.

Useful_tip_for finding which_streaming service a_film is on: google_“film name
streaming” and_google_lists the answers in a box at the top of the results.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
The problem with_recommending_that people_buy_the_DVD/Blu-Ray is that the
agreed-upon canon_of great films stretches into_the many_hundreds of titles
(Ebert’s list at 364 titles is_only_an abridged canon.)_Therefore, for someone
seeking a cultural education, buying the physical_releases would run into the
thousands and_thousands of dollars._It_would_be a challenge even_for North
Americans or Western Europeans to_amass a suitable collection, let alone
people_in lower-income countries. Consequently, a person can_only
realistically learn about great cinema by_streaming from multiple subscription
sites, or_torrenting, and_people disappointed by the former_ought to remember
that_the latter_exists.

~~~
dfxm12
You can sub_to one streaming service and never_run out of_great films to watch
(in part _because__titles_rotate, not in_spite_of,_but that's_beside the
point). Justifying_piracy_because, for_example,_you're disappointed that
Netflix is missing one_great_film, is disingenuous.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
You misunderstand my point. It’s_not that a person_might_be looking just for
"great_films to watch", in which_case any streaming site might satisfy_them.
It is_that a_person might be looking for _the_ great films, that entire canon
of_films which scholars hold to be_important. Netflix is never_going to_have
them_all regardless of_how_much they_rotate.

~~~
dfxm12
That doesn't really affect my point. No_streaming service_will meet your
unreasonable demands (for many_reasons, first of all_is_that there is not an
objectively agreed_upon list of _the_ great films),_and therefore justifying
piracy because of_it_is_disingenuous.

~~~
Mediterraneo10
That a service should have_it all is not an unreasonable_demand, and it_is
peculiar that you chide someone for "justifying_piracy"._After all, the HN
crowd is generally_very_sympathetic to Library Genesis, which is_aiming_to
gradually