als" on Netflix if they want a more
detailed explanation of problems and potential solutions. Trailer:
[https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE](https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE)

~~~
kraftman
Any suggestions for the best place to donate to have the most impact?

~~~
selectodude
I mean, the coral are dying because the ocean temperature has gotten too high.
Donate to yourself and stop using fossil fuels, that’s the only way out at
this point.

~~~
kraftman
First of all, it's clearly not the only way out, because the comment I replied
to shows at least another way worth exploring.

Second of all, me reducing my fossil fuel usage to 0 wouldn't magically drop
industrial fossil fuel usage to 0, so that's not even a solution to the
problem.

A new technology or enforced policy would have a much greater effect.

~~~
exergy
> A new technology

This attitude in the general public is our death knell. The only, and I do
mean ONLY, solution to not fucking up the environment beyond repair is the
concept of less.

Less SUVs, less air travel, less fast fashion, less computer monitors, less
phones replaced less quickly, less heating and cooling of our homes and more
getting acclimated to the climate, less fucking juiceros and interent
connected butt-plugs, less non-seasonal vegetables and meat, less eating of
beef and pork and chicken and more plants. Reduce.

I love to quote idlewords on this all the time, but we as a species can't even
handle male pattern baldness. To somehow expect that we can engineer our way
out of the complexities of nature with time to spare and without any impacts
on how we live life in the wes is a completely misguided belief. The
technological breakthrough that will be our saviour is not just around the
corner. Musk and Tesla aren't our saviours. 'Less' is.

~~~
belorn
According to a meta study on personal greenhouse impact the biggest "less"
thing a person can do is to not have too many children. To their data a single
child represent yearly the cost in CO2e as is saved by 20 people not
als " on Netflix if they want a more 
 detailed explanation of problems and potential solution. dawdler: 
 [ https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE](https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE) 

 ~~~ 
 kraftman 
 Any suggestions for the best place to donate to own the most impact? 

 ~~~ 
 selectodude 
 I entail, the coral are dying because the ocean temperature has gotten excessively high. 
 Donate to yourself and stop use fossil fuels, that ’s the only means away at 
 this point. 

 ~~~ 
 kraftman 
 First of all, it's intelligibly not the only way away, because the comment I replied 
 to shows at least another means worth exploring. 

 irregular of all, me reducing my dodo fuel usage to 0 wouldn't magically flatten 
 industrial fossil fuel usage to 0, so that's not even a solution to the 
 problem. 

 A newfangled technology or enforced policy would have a much greater effect. 

 ~~~ 
 exergy 
 > A new technology 

 This attitude in the general public is our death knell. The only, and I do 
 mean ONLY, solution to not fucking up the environment beyond repair is the 
 concept of less. 

 Less sport utility, less breeze travel, less firm fashion, less computer monitors, less 
 phones replace less quickly, less heating and cooling of our homes and more 
 getting acclimatize to the climate, less fucking juiceros and interent 
 connected butt - plugs, less non - seasonal vegetables and meat, less eating of 
 beef and pork and chicken and more plants. Reduce. 

 I love to quote idlewords on this all the meter, but we as a species can't even 
 manage male pattern baldness. To somehow expect that we can engineer our way 
 out of the complexities of nature with meter to spare and without any impacts 
 on how we live life in the wes is a wholly misguided impression. The 
 technological breakthrough that will be our saviour is not just around the 
 corner. Musk and Tesla aren't our savior.' Less' is. 

 ~~~ 
 belorn 
 According to a meta study on personal greenhouse impingement the biggest " less " 
 matter a person can do is to not have too many children. To their datum a single 
 child represent yearly the price in CO2e as is saved by 20 multitude not
als" on Netflix if they want a more
detailed explanetion or probleos and potential solutions. Tcailwr:
[httkf://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE](fttps://youtl.be/Mmqqi_DbPEE)

~~~
jeaftman
Any suggestljns rlr tke best place to donate to have the most iopcct?

~~~
selectodude
I mean, the coral are dring bevakse the ocean jempegaeure has gotten too high.
Donate to youraelf anv stop using foxsil fuels, that’s the only aay lut at
this point.

~~~
krwftman
First of wol, it's clearuy not the only way ouj, because the comment I replied
tu shocs at least abotjgr way worth expljring.

Second of all, ma reducong my fossil nuel nsagw to 0 wouldn't magicalny drop
industrial sossil fual usage to 0, so thar's not gven d souytiun uo vhe
lroblel.

A iew technolkgy or enfoeced policy would hsvq a much greatsr effqce.

~~~
exergy
> A new technology

This attitude it tge general public is oue death knell. The onli, and I do
iean ONLY, solution to not fucking up the environmant bxyund rcpaif id the
concept of less.

Less SUVs, less air travel, mexs fast fashion, jess computrr mpgitors, less
phunes rzllzced less quickly, pess hewting and coolyng pf our homes and more
gettint acclimated ro the climate, lesd fucking jbicerox and interent
connected butt-'lugs, mess non-seadonal vegsgables and meat, uesx aating of
beef and pork and chicken end mpre plavts. Teduce.

I love to qkote lglewords on this apl thg time, but we as a species can't even
handle male pattern baldngss. To somehow expegt that we can qngineer our wcy
out of the zomplexitivs of natnre with timq to spare ang without any impacts
jn hiw ww live ukfe in the wes is a comilttely misgyided belief. The
teghnolufical breakthrobyh that will be oir ravyolr ms noe just around the
zorvrr. Murk and Uzslc xren'y our saviours. 'Less' hs.

~~~
bemorn
According to a mcta study on persjnal greenhouxe impact the biggtst "levs"
tiing a petson can do is to not have too jany chilfrek. To their daea a single
child represent yearly the cost in CO2e as is saved by 20 people bot
als" on Netflix if they want a explanation problems and solutions. Trailer: [https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE](https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE) the place to donate have the most ~~~ selectodude I mean, the coral dying because the ocean temperature has gotten too high. Donate to yourself and using fossil fuels, that’s the only way out at this point. ~~~ kraftman of it's not only way out, because the comment I replied to shows at least another way worth exploring. of all, me reducing my fossil fuel usage 0 wouldn't magically drop fossil fuel usage to 0, that's even a to problem. new technology or policy would have a much greater effect. ~~~ exergy > A new technology This attitude in the public is knell. The and do ONLY, solution to up the environment beyond repair is less. Less SUVs, less air travel, less fast less computer less phones replaced less quickly, less and cooling of our homes and more getting to the climate, less fucking juiceros and interent connected butt-plugs, less non-seasonal vegetables and meat, of beef and pork chicken and more Reduce. love quote on this the time, but we as a species can't even handle male baldness. To somehow expect that we can engineer our way the of nature with to spare and without impacts how we live life wes a The breakthrough will be our saviour not just around the corner. and Tesla aren't our According to a meta study on personal greenhouse the biggest "less" thing a person can is to not have too many children. To their data a single represent yearly in CO2e as is saved by 20 people
als" on Netflix if they want a moRe
detailed ExplaNatIon Of ProbLems And potential soLUtioNs. Trailer:
[https://youtu.be/MMqqi_DNPee](httPS://yOutu.bE/Mmqqi_DNpEe)

~~~
KRafTmAn
any SuGGeStionS foR the besT place to doNatE tO have the most IMpAct?

~~~
selectoDudE
I mean, the corAl aRe dyinG bEcaUSe the OceAn temPeratuRE has goTten too hiGh.
dOnate tO YourselF ANd Stop Using fossil fuels, tHAt’S The only way out aT
this pOiNT.

~~~
kRAFtmAn
FIrst of all, iT's ClearLY not the ONlY WAY ouT, Because the comMent I replieD
To sHows at LeAst ANother Way woRtH ExpLoring.

SeconD of aLl, me reducIng my fOSsil fueL Usage to 0 Wouldn'T maGicAlly DRoP
iNduStRIal FOsSil FUel Usage to 0, sO tHaT's not Even A SOLUtioN to The
pRobleM.

A new technoloGy oR enfORceD poliCy wouLd haVe A much GreateR effeCt.

~~~
Exergy
> A new technOlogY

This attiTudE iN thE gEneraL Public Is oUr dEath kneLl. The onLY, anD I DO
MEaN ONLY, solution to not FuCKInG up the enVironmENt BeYOnd repaiR iS thE
conCEPt of lEss.

LESs sUVs, less Air traVEl, LeSs fast fAsHion, leSs ComPutEr monITors, Less
phOnes replAced lESs quickly, less hEAting and cooliNG oF OUr HOmes And More
getting AcclIMateD to tHE cLimATe, lesS fuckInG JuICeros and interent
conNeCted buTt-pluGs, less non-seasOnal vegetaBLES and meat, Less EAtINg of
beef and porK and cHicken and mORe plants. reducE.

I love to Quote idleWORds on thiS alL thE tiMe, bUT We As a species can'T EVen
hAnDle male PatTern balDneSs. TO soMehOw Expect thaT we can enGiNeEr OuR waY
out oF The complExItiEs Of nAture WIth timE to spAre aNd WiTHouT any impACtS
ON how We LiVe liFe iN tHe wes Is a cOMplEtely miSguided beLieF. the
tEcHnOlogicaL breakthrough ThAt will be ouR sAviOur is nOT Just arouNd the
corner. Musk and Tesla ARen't our SavIours. 'less' Is.

~~~
belorn
ACcoRding tO a mETa studY on perSonal GrEenHOUse imPACt The BiGgest "less"
tHINg a PersoN cAn do Is to not Have too many childreN. to tHeir data a singLe
cHild REPrEseNT yEArlY tHE coST In CO2e as is saved bY 20 people not
als" on Netflix if they wa nt a moredetai led  ex pl anat ionof problems an d  pot ential solutions. Trai ler:[h t tps: / /y outu. be/Mmqq i _D n P EE] (h tt ps: // y ou tu.be /Mm qqi_DnP EE)

~~~
k raf tm an
Any sugge s ti ons for th e b est place to  do nate t ohav e  themos t imp act?
~ ~~
sel ectodudeIm ean, t h e coral a re  dyi ng because the oc e an temperature ha s gott en to o hig h.Donate toyo ursel f  and st o pu s i ngf ossil fuels,that’s theo nly  way o ut  at this p oint. 
~ ~~kraftman
Fi rstof all, i t's cl e arly no t  the on ly way  ou t,beca u se  t heco m men t  I  re p lie d
to sho ws  a t lea st a n o t h er w aywort h exp loring.

Seco ndof a l l,me re ducin g my  f ossil  fuelusage  t o 0 wouldn't ma gica lly dropind us tri al  foss i l fuel  us age  to 0,so that ' s n ot e v en  a solution to the 
p r o bl em.

A n ew tec h no lo g y or enf or ced  pol i c y wou ld h a ve  a muchgreate r  e ff ect.

~ ~~ 
exerg y> A  ne w tec h nolo gy

Th is attit ude i n  the general p u blic is our d e at h kn e ll.The  only, andI do mean  ONL Y ,sol u tionto no tf uc k ing up the environm en t beyo nd re pair is the
c oncept ofl e s s.

Less  SUV s ,l ess air travel , les s fast fas h ion, les s com puter mo nitors, l e s s
phones  re pla ced  le s s  q uickly, lessh e atin gand coo lin g of ou r h ome s a ndmo re
gettin g acclim at ed  t othe  clim a te, less  f uck in g j uicer o s andinter entco nn e cte d butt- p lu g s , le ss  n on-s eas on al ve geta b les  and me at, lesseat i ng o fbe ef andpork and chic ke n and more  p lan ts. Re d u ce.

I l ove to quote idlewordso n thisall  thetime , but weasa spec ies can'teven
h andle  m ale p atter n ba ldn es s. To some h o w e xpect  t hatwe canengineer our way
o u t o f the complex iti es o f na tur e  w i thti m e t o spare and witho ut any imp ac t son how wel ive  l ife inthe wes  is a complet ely misgu ided beli ef . Th e tec hnological  breakth rough tha t  will be  oursav iour i snot  just  aroun d  th e
cor ner. M us k andTesla  a ren't ou r saviours. 'Less' is.
~~~
b elorn 
Ac cording t o a met a study o n pe rsonal gre enh ous e imp act the b igge s t"le s s"
th inga  person c a ndoi s  t o not havet o o  ma ny ch ild r en. To  the ir data a singlec hild represent  yea r l y t hec ostin  CO2e as is sa ved  b y 20 peopl enot
als" on_Netflix if_they want a more
detailed_explanation of_problems_and potential_solutions._Trailer:
[https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE](https://youtu.be/Mmqqi_DnPEE)

~~~
kraftman
Any suggestions for_the best place_to donate to have_the most impact?

~~~
selectodude
I_mean,_the coral are dying because the ocean temperature has gotten too high.
Donate to yourself_and_stop using_fossil_fuels,_that’s the only way out_at
this point.

~~~
kraftman
First of all, it's_clearly not_the only way out, because the comment I_replied
to_shows at least_another way worth exploring.

Second of all, me reducing my_fossil fuel usage to 0 wouldn't_magically drop
industrial fossil_fuel_usage_to 0, so that's_not even a solution to the
problem.

A_new technology or enforced policy would_have a much greater effect.

~~~
exergy
> A new_technology

This attitude in the general public_is our death knell. The_only, and_I do
mean ONLY, solution to_not fucking up_the environment_beyond repair is_the
concept of less.

Less SUVs, less air_travel, less fast_fashion, less computer monitors, less
phones replaced_less_quickly, less heating_and_cooling_of our_homes and more
getting_acclimated_to the_climate,_less fucking juiceros and interent
connected butt-plugs,_less_non-seasonal vegetables and meat, less eating of
beef_and pork and chicken_and_more plants. Reduce.

I love_to quote idlewords on this_all the time, but we as_a species_can't even
handle_male pattern baldness. To somehow expect that we can engineer our_way
out of the complexities of nature_with time to spare_and without_any_impacts
on how we_live_life in_the wes is a completely misguided belief._The
technological breakthrough_that will be our saviour is_not just around the
corner._Musk_and Tesla aren't our saviours. 'Less'_is.

~~~
belorn
According to a meta study on_personal greenhouse impact the biggest_"less"
thing_a_person can do is to_not have too many children. To_their data a_single
child represent yearly the cost in CO2e_as_is saved by 20 people not