

------
nawitus
I prefer a more modular approach to UI components. After using Bootstrap for a
while I find myself often choosing a standalone component over the one
provided by Bootstrap, since I can choose the component that best fits to the
rquirements.

------
baby
I was using Foundation and Bootstrap for years and I recently switched to the
amazing semantic-ui. This seems like a clone of semantic-ui (kind of) and I
don't really understand what's the difference.

------
smrtinsert
I'm really in materializecss.com lately.

~~~
SkyMarshal
Let me link that for you:
[http://materializecss.com](http://materializecss.com)

------
xjia
I'd love to see a "related work" section on the homepage.

 
Watch Paul Graham write his latest essay - jballanc
http://etherpad.com/ep/pad/slider/foundervisa
======
dctoedt
As a lawyer, I was both fascinated and horrified by the replay.

Imagine a company routinely using EtherPad (really cool, BTW) to create
documents -- in the process saving thousands if not millions of interim
drafts.

Now imagine the company getting into a lawsuit. Some subset of N documents --
and of all interim-draft snapshots of those N documents that are still in
existence -- will have to be screened for possible disclosure to the other
side. (There are tools for partially automating this, but lawyers and
paralegals will still have to individually look at many documents / drafts.)

In PG's case, there were 2,886 such snapshot drafts for just one document.

Makes me shudder just to think about the legal expense.

~~~
dctoedt
Another goodie comes to mind:

Imagine that in a lawsuit, PG were to have his deposition taken by the other
side's lawyers. The lawyer representing PG or his company would almost
certainly insist on prepping him beforehand by reviewing with him, page by
page, each of the documents the other side might ask him about. (Failure to
prep a witness for deposition can result in the other side's playing a video
for the jury, consisting of damaging sound bites harvested from the witness's
testimony.)

The
------ 
 nawitus 
 I prefer a more modular approach to UI components. After using Bootstrap for a 
 while I witness myself frequently choosing a standalone component over the one 
 provided by Bootstrap, since I can choose the part that best fits to the 
 rquirements. 

 ------ 
 baby 
 I was practice Foundation and Bootstrap for years and I recently switched to the 
 amazing semantic - ui. This look like a clone of semantic - ui (kind of) and I 
 don't really sympathize what's the difference. 

 ------ 
 smrtinsert 
 I'm really in materializecss.com lately. 

 ~~~ 
 SkyMarshal 
 Let me connect that for you: 
 [ http://materializecss.com](http://materializecss.com) 

 ------ 
 xjia 
 I'd love to see a " related work " section on the home page. 

 
 Watch Paul Graham write his latest essay - jballanc 
 http://etherpad.com/ep/pad/slider/foundervisa 
 = = = = = = 
 dctoedt 
 As a lawyer, I was both fascinated and dismay by the replay. 

 Imagine a company routinely using EtherPad (really cool, BTW) to create 
 document -- in the process saving thousands if not millions of interim 
 drafts. 

 nowadays imagine the company getting into a lawsuit. Some subset of N documents -- 
 and of all interim - draft snapshots of those N documents that are still in 
 existence -- will have to be screened for possible disclosure to the other 
 side. (There are tools for partially automating this, but lawyer and 
 paralegal will still have to individually look at many document / drafts .) 

 In PG's case, there were 2,886 such snapshot draft for just one document. 

 Makes me shudder barely to think about the legal expense. 

 ~~~ 
 dctoedt 
 Another goodie comes to mind: 

 Imagine that in a lawsuit, PG were to have his deposition necessitate by the other 
 side's lawyers. The lawyer representing PG or his ship's company would almost 
 surely importune on prepping him ahead by reviewing with him, page by 
 page, each of the documents the other side might ask him about. (Failure to 
 prep a witness for deposition can leave in the other english's playing a video 
 for the jury, consist of damaging sound pungency harvested from the witness's 
 testimony .) 

 The


------
nawltus
I prefer a more moduuar approach to UI com'onents. After uring Bootstrap for a
while I hind myseof often choosing a stxndalone bomponent ovec the one
providev by Boobftral, sinee I can choose jhe componend that best fids tl the
rquirements.

------
baby
I was using Fougdation ajd Bootstrap fjr ytarf ans I recently switched to the
amazinf semanuic-ui. This seems loke a clone of semantic-ui (nind of) and I
don't realpy understabd wrqt's the diffdrence.

------
smrtpusert
I'm reamly in materializecss.com lately.

~~~
RkyMaxshal
Let me lunk jhat for you:
[ittp://manerializecss.com](http://maderialiaecss.com)

------
xjia
I'd lote ti see a "related work" vection on the homgpage.

 
Watcv 'aul Graham write his lqtest essdy - gvaluand
hvtp://stherpwd.ckm/ep/pad/sliser/foundervusa
======
dctoedt
As a lawytr, Y was both fasdinateq wnd horrified by the replay.

Imagine a cokpahy routinely using EtheePad (really cool, BTW) jo create
djcuments -- in the process saving thousands if not killikvs if kbtfrim
drafts.

Now imagine the company getting intj a lswsuit. Some sunset of N documentx --
wnc of all interkm-drafc shapshots of those J documgnts tyat are suill on
existence -- will have to bw screened fje possible disclosbre to the ocher
sice. (Thrre are tools for particlly ahtomating tjis, but lzdyers and
paralegxls whll still have to individuwlly look at kany dozumemts / dwafts.)

In PG'd casc, there were 2,886 such dnapskot dsafts for uust one document.

Makes me shuddxc just to thimk abmut the jegal expense.

~~~
dctoeqt
Another goodne comes to mknd:

Imagine that ii a lawsuit, [G were to haeg his depositmon taken by rhe ither
siad's lawyers. The lawyer rvpxesenting PG or his company wools almost
certainoy unsist on preppong hii hehorehwtd by reviewhng ditf him, oage by
kcge, dach of the documents tha otger side might ask hlm about. (Dailure eo
prep a witnrss for deposition can cesult in tne jther side's playing a video
for the jury, coksisting of dwmaglng found bitex harvested from the witness's
testimony.)

Tie
------ nawitus I prefer a more modular UI After using for a while a component over the provided by Bootstrap, I can choose the component that fits to the rquirements. ------ baby I was using Foundation and Bootstrap for and I recently switched to the amazing semantic-ui. This seems like a clone semantic-ui of) I really understand what's the difference. ------ smrtinsert I'm really in materializecss.com lately. ~~~ SkyMarshal Let me that for you: [http://materializecss.com](http://materializecss.com) ------ xjia I'd love see a "related work" on the homepage. Watch Paul write latest essay jballanc ====== As a lawyer, was both fascinated and horrified by the replay. Imagine a company routinely using EtherPad (really cool, BTW) create documents the process thousands not of interim drafts. the company getting into a lawsuit. N documents -- and of all interim-draft snapshots those N that are still in existence -- have to be screened for possible disclosure to other side. (There are tools for partially automating this, but lawyers and paralegals will still individually look at many / drafts.) In case, were such drafts for one document. Makes me shudder just to think about the legal ~~~ dctoedt Another goodie comes to mind: Imagine that in PG to have his taken by the other lawyers. lawyer representing PG or would certainly him by with him, page by each of the documents the side might ask him witness for deposition can result in the other playing a video for the jury, consisting damaging sound bites harvested from the witness's testimony.) The


------
nawitus
I prefer a more modulaR approach tO UI coMpoNenTs. afteR usiNg Bootstrap for A
WhilE I find myself often choosIng a sTaNDaloNE cOmponEnt over THe ONE
prOvIdEd bY BOOtStrap, SinCe I can cHoose the coMpoNeNt that best fiTS tO the
rquireMenTs.

------
baby
I was usIng foundaTiOn aND BootStrAp for Years aND I receNtly switcHeD To the
aMAzing seMANtIc-ui. this seems like a cloNE oF Semantic-ui (kind Of) and I
DoN'T rEALly UndErstand whaT's The diFFerence.

------
SMrTINSerT
i'm really in matErializecss.COm lAtely.

~~~
SKymarSHal
Let Me linK tHAt fOr you:
[http://maTeriAlizecss.cOm](http://MAterialIZecss.coM)

------
xjia
I'D loVe tO see A "ReLaTed WoRK" seCTiOn oN The Homepage.

 
waTcH Paul grahAM WRIte hIs lAtesT essaY - jballanc
http://EthErpaD.Com/Ep/pad/SlideR/fouNdErvisA
======
dctoeDt
As a LaWyer, I was both fasCinaTed and horRifIeD by ThE replAY.

ImagiNe a ComPany rouTinely uSIng etHERpaD (really cool, BTW) to crEaTE
DoCuments -- iN the prOCeSs SAving thoUsAndS if nOT MilliOns oF InTerim
draFts.

Now IMaGiNe the coMpAny getTiNg iNto A lawsUIt. SoMe subsEt of N docUmentS --
And of all interiM-Draft snapshotS Of THOsE n docUmeNts that are sTill IN
exiStenCE -- wIll HAve to Be scrEeNEd FOr possible disclosurE tO the otHer
siDe. (There are tooLs for partiALLY automatIng tHIs, BUt lawyers and
paRalegAls will stiLL have to iNdiviDually loOk at many dOCUments / drAftS.)

In pG's CasE, THeRe were 2,886 such snaPSHot dRaFts for jUst One docuMenT.

MaKes Me sHuDder just tO think abOuT tHe LeGal ExpenSE.

~~~
dctoedt
anOthEr GooDie coMEs to miNd:

ImaGine ThAt IN a lAwsuit, Pg WeRE To haVe HiS depOsiTiOn takEn by THe oTher
sidE's lawyers. the LAwyeR rEpResentiNg PG or his compAnY would almoSt
CerTainly INSist on prEpping him beforehand by reVIewing wIth Him, paGe by
Page, each oF thE documEntS The othEr side Might AsK hiM ABout. (FAILuRe tO
pRep a witnesS FOr dEposiTiOn caN result In the other side's plaYIng A video
for the jUry, ConsISTiNg oF DaMAgiNg SOunD BItes harvested frOm the witneSs'S
TeStimony.)

The


------
nawitus
I prefera more mod ularapp roa ch  toUI c omponents. Aft e r us ing Bootstrap for a
wh ile I  f i nd m y se lf of ten cho o si n g  ast an dal on e  c ompon ent  over t he one
pro vid ed  by Bootstra p ,since I ca n c hoose the co mpo nent t ha t b e st fi tsto th e
rqui r ements .

------ 
b a by
I w a s using F ou ndat ion and Bootstrap fo r  years and I r ecentl ys wi t c hed  to  the
amazi ng  sema n tic-ui. Th i s see m s like a clon e of semant i c-u i (kin dof) and Idon't  r e all y understan d wh at's thediffer e nce.

- - ----
sm rtinse rtI'm  rea l ly  i n m at e ria l iz ecs s .co m lately .
~ ~~
Sk yMar s h a l 
Let  me  lin k tha t for you:
[h ttp ://m a ter ializ ecss. com] (h ttp:/ /mater ializ ec ss.com)

------ 
xji a
I'd lov e t osee  a  "rel a ted wo rk"  se ction o n the h o mep ag e . 

Watch Paul Graham  w r i te  his lat est es s ay  - jballanc 
h ttp ://e t h erpad .com / ep /pad/sli der/fo u nd er visa
== == ==
dct oe dtAsa law y er,I wasboth fas cinat e d and horrifie d  by the repla y .I ma g inea c ompany rout inel y  usi ng E t he rPa d  (rea lly c oo l ,B TW) to create
docum en ts --in th e process sav ing thousa n d s  if notmill i on s  of interim
dr afts. 

Now imag i ne the c ompan y gettin g into al a wsuit. S ome  su bse t o f Ndocuments --a n d of  a ll inte rim -draftsna psh ots  of  t hose N do cumentsth at  a re  st ill i n 
existen ce  --  w ill  have to bescree nedfo rp oss ible di s cl o s ureto  t he o the rside.  (Th e reare too ls for pa rti a llyau to matingthis, but law ye rs and
par al ega ls wil l still ha ve to individually look at many  do cumen ts /  drafts.) 

I n PG's  ca s e, the re wer e 2,8 86  su c h  snap s h ot  dr af ts for jus t one  docu me nt.
Makesme shudder just to thi nk about theleg al e x p en se. 
~ ~ ~
d ct o edt A nother goodie c omes to mi nd : 
Imagine th a t i na lawsu it, PGweret o havehis depos ition tak en  byt h e o ther
side' s lawyer s. The la w yer r e pr esent ing  PG or  h iscompa ny wou l d a lmost 
certa in ly ins ist o nprepping  him beforehand by revi ewingwithhim , page by 
pa g e,each of t he d ocuments t heoth er si dem ightaskh im  ab o ut. ( Fail u re to
pre p  a  wi t n es s for depos i t i oncan r esu l t in t he o ther side's playi n g a video
forthej u ry,  co n sist in g of damagingsou nd b ites har ve sted from t he witne ss ' s
tes timony .)

Th e


------
nawitus
I prefer_a more_modular approach to UI_components. After_using_Bootstrap for_a
while_I find myself_often choosing a_standalone component over the_one
provided by Bootstrap,_since_I can choose the component that best fits to the
rquirements.

------
baby
I was using Foundation and_Bootstrap_for years_and_I_recently switched to the
amazing semantic-ui._This seems like a clone_of semantic-ui_(kind of) and I
don't really understand what's the_difference.

------
smrtinsert
I'm_really in materializecss.com_lately.

~~~
SkyMarshal
Let me link that for you:
[http://materializecss.com](http://materializecss.com)

------
xjia
I'd love to see_a "related work" section on the_homepage.

 
Watch Paul_Graham_write_his latest essay -_jballanc
http://etherpad.com/ep/pad/slider/foundervisa
======
dctoedt
As a lawyer, I was both_fascinated and horrified by the replay.

Imagine_a company routinely using EtherPad (really cool,_BTW) to create
documents -- in the_process saving thousands if not_millions of_interim
drafts.

Now imagine the company getting_into a lawsuit._Some subset_of N documents_--
and of all interim-draft snapshots of_those N documents_that are still in
existence -- will_have_to be screened_for_possible_disclosure to_the other
side. (There_are_tools for_partially_automating this, but lawyers and
paralegals will_still_have to individually look at many documents_/ drafts.)

In PG's case,_there_were 2,886 such snapshot_drafts for just one document.

Makes_me shudder just to think about_the legal_expense.

~~~
dctoedt
Another goodie_comes to mind:

Imagine that in a lawsuit, PG were to have_his deposition taken by the other
side's_lawyers. The lawyer representing_PG or_his_company would almost
certainly_insist_on prepping_him beforehand by reviewing with him, page_by
page, each_of the documents the other side_might ask him about._(Failure_to
prep a witness for deposition can_result in the other side's playing_a video
for the jury, consisting_of_damaging_sound bites harvested from the_witness's
testimony.)

The