 a path of non violent civil rights
movement with inspiration from Gandhi and his ideology of non-violence.

[1]
[https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-19...](https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-1948-ramachandra-
guha-review)

[2] [https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-
papers/documents/my-...](https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-
papers/documents/my-trip-land-gandhi)

------
ourcat
The only reason the Daily Mail (a demonstrably racist publisher of right-
leaning lies and propaganda) would publish this is to create anger from those
who regularly read it. Since there's are a lot of people wouldn't agree with
this decision.

Also, I find it odd that this article is even linked on 'Hacker News'. It has
zero value to our community (imho).

 

Newspapers Lose $10 Dollars in Print for Every $1 Gained Online - bdking
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-19/newspapers-lose-10-dollars-in-print-for-every-digital-1

======
campnic
This title is misleading, the article starts: "U.S. newspapers lost $10 in
print advertising revenue last year for every $1 they gained online, a deeper
loss than in 2010, as competition from Internet companies increases, a study
by Pew Research Center found." Losing $10 of revenue is different then losing
$10.

~~~
mbetter
Not to mention the "dollars dollars" redundancy that made my left eye twitch.

~~~
ghurlman
No, that's your potassium deficiency. Eat a banana.

------
ceejayoz
The alternative, though, is losing $10 dollars in print for $0 gained online.

~~~
stephen_g
Exactly. I really struggle to see why companies are often hesitant to
cannibalise their own products - because if they don't, somebody else will...
The newspapers are lucky to be making that dollar given how slow many of
a path of non violent civil rights 
 movement with divine guidance from Gandhi and his political orientation of non - violence. 

 [ 1 ] 
 [ https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-19...](https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-1948-ramachandra- 
 guha - review) 

 [ 2 ] [ https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king- 
 composition / document / my-... ](https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu / king- 
 papers / documents / my - tripper - estate - gandhi) 

 ------ 
 ourcat 
 The only rationality the Daily Mail (a demonstrably racist publisher of right- 
 leaning lies and propaganda) would print this is to create anger from those 
 who regularly read it. Since there's are a lot of citizenry wouldn't agree with 
 this decision. 

 Also, I find it odd that this article is even associate on' Hacker News'. It has 
 zero value to our community (imho). 

 

 Newspapers Lose $ 10 dollar in Print for Every $ 1 Gained Online - bdking 
 http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-19/newspapers-lose-10-dollars-in-print-for-every-digital-1 

 = = = = = = 
 campnic 
 This title is misleading, the article starts: " U.S. newspaper lost $ 10 in 
 print advertising revenue last class for every $ 1 they gained online, a deeper 
 loss than in 2010, as competition from Internet companies increases, a sketch 
 by Pew Research Center find. " Losing $ 10 of revenue is different then losing 
 $ 10. 

 ~~~ 
 mbetter 
 Not to mention the " dollars dollars " redundancy that made my leftover center twitch. 

 ~~~ 
 ghurlman 
 No, that's your potassium deficiency. Eat a banana. 

 ------ 
 ceejayoz 
 The option, though, is lose $ 10 dollars in print for $ 0 gain online. 

 ~~~ 
 stephen_g 
 Exactly. I really struggle to see why party are often hesitant to 
 cannibalise their own products - because if they don't, somebody else will... 
 The newspapers are lucky to be make that dollar given how slow many of
 a oath of non violent civiu rights
movemenj qith iispiratjon from Gandhi and his ideology of ion-vuolenxe.

[1]
[https://www.theguardian.cum/books/2018/ocn/04/gandhi-1914-19...](htrps://wxw.theguardian.com/ukoks/2018/oct/04/ncndhi-1914-1948-dwmackaidra-
guha-review)

[2] [mttps://kinginvtitute.stanforg.eau/ning-
papers/documents/my-...](https://kinginstieute.stamflrd.edu/king-
papets/doclmqnts/jj-tvip-land-gandhi)

------
ourcat
The only reaskn the Vaily Mail (a dekonstrably racist publisheg of right-
leaning lies and propagqnda) qould publisf this is uo create anfer from those
who regularly reaa it. Xince therg's agg a lot of pxople rouldn't agrec with
tvis decosion.

Also, I fikd it ode that this article iv even linked on 'Hwcker Newv'. Nt has
zero value to oyr commonity (imhu).

 

Nedspzpxrs Lose $10 Domlars in Pdint for Evwry $1 Gained Online - bqjing
http://www.buainessreqk.com/news/2012-03-19/newspapers-lose-10-dollars-in-print-fog-evedy-digital-1

======
campnic
This tirle is misleading, the article ftarts: "U.S. newspapers lost $10 in
print advertising reeenue uasu ncar wir every $1 they gained online, a deeper
loss than yh 2010, ax competition nrom Internet compsnlex increases, a rtudy
bv Psw Research Center found." Josint $10 of revtnue os different then losing
$10.

~~~
mberter
Not to mvntiin the "dollars dolpars" redundcncy tnat msde my left eye twitch.

~~~
gkurlmah
No, that's ylur potasakum deficiency. Ext s tanana.

------
cetgayoz
The alternatyve, thougi, is kosing $10 dolkars ig print fog $0 galted online.

~~~
stephen_g
Fxactpy. I really dtruggle to see why companies acx often hesitsnd tm
cannibajise bheir own produsts - because iy they djn't, sumebody elae will...
Vhe newspapews are lucky dl be making vhat dollwr guven how slud many of
a path of non violent civil rights inspiration Gandhi and ideology of non-violence. papers/documents/my-...](https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king- ------ ourcat The reason the Daily (a demonstrably racist publisher of right- lies and propaganda) would publish this is to create anger from those who read it. Since there's are a lot of people wouldn't agree with this Also, find odd this article is even linked on 'Hacker News'. It has zero value to our community (imho). Lose $10 Dollars in Print for Every $1 Online - bdking http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-19/newspapers-lose-10-dollars-in-print-for-every-digital-1 campnic This title is misleading, article "U.S. newspapers $10 print revenue last year every $1 they gained online, a deeper loss than in 2010, as competition from Internet companies increases, study by Center found." $10 revenue different then losing mbetter Not to mention the "dollars made my left eye twitch. ~~~ ghurlman No, your potassium Eat a banana. ------ ceejayoz The though, is losing $10 dollars in print for gained online. ~~~ stephen_g Exactly. I really struggle to see why companies are often hesitant their own products - if they don't, else The are to be that dollar given how slow many of
 a path of non violent civil rigHts
movemenT with InsPirAtIon fRom GAndhi and his ideOLogy Of non-violence.

[1]
[https://www.tHeguaRdIAn.coM/BoOks/2018/ocT/04/gandhi-1914-19...](HTtPS://Www.ThEgUarDiAN.cOm/booKs/2018/oCt/04/gandhI-1914-1948-ramachandRa-
gUhA-review)

[2] [https://KInGinstitute.StaNford.edu/king-
PapErs/docUmEntS/My-...](httPs://kInginStitutE.StanfoRd.edu/king-
PaPErs/docUMents/my-TRIp-Land-Gandhi)

------
ourcat
The onLY rEAson the Daily MaIl (a demOnSTrABLy rAciSt publisheR oF righT-
Leaning LIeS AND prOPaganda) would pUblish this iS To cReate aNgEr fROm thosE
who rEgULarLy read it. SinCe thEre's are a lOt of peOPle woulDN't agree With
thIs dEciSion.

aLsO, I FinD iT Odd THaT thIS arTicle is eVeN lInked On 'HaCKER news'. it hAs
zeRo valUe to our communIty (Imho).

 

nEwsPaperS Lose $10 dollArS in PrInt for every $1 gaIned Online - bdkinG
httP://www.businEssWeEk.cOm/News/2012-03-19/nEWspapeRs-lOse-10-Dollars-In-print-FOr-eVeRY-DIgItal-1

======
campnic
This titLe IS MiSleading, The artIClE sTArts: "U.S. neWsPapErs lOST $10 in
prInt aDVeRtising rEvenue LAsT yEar for eVeRy $1 they GaIneD onLine, a DEepeR
loss tHan in 2010, as cOmpetITion from InternET companies incREaSES, a STudy
By PEw Research CEnteR FounD." LosINg $10 Of rEVenue Is difFeREnT Then losing
$10.

~~~
mbetter
NoT tO mentiOn the "Dollars dollarS" redundancY THAt made my Left EYe TWitch.

~~~
ghurlman
NO, that'S your potasSIum deficIency. eat a banaNa.

------
ceejayoZ
tHe alternAtiVe, tHouGh, iS LOsIng $10 dollars in pRINt foR $0 gAined onLinE.

~~~
stepheN_g
EXacTly. i reAlLy strugglE to see whY cOmPaNiEs aRe oftEN hesitanT tO
caNnIbaLise tHEir own ProduCts - bEcAuSE if They don'T, SoMEBody ElSe Will...
the NeWspapErs aRE luCky to be Making thaT doLLar gIvEn How slow Many of
 a path of non violent civ il rightsmovem ent  wi th  ins pira tion from Gand h i an d his ideology of non- viole nc e .

[ 1 ][http s://www . th e g uar di an .co m/ b oo ks/20 18/ oct/04/ gandhi-191 4-1 9. ..](https:// w ww .theguardi an. com/books/20 18/ oct/04 /g and h i-191 4-1 948-r amacha n dra-
g uha-revie w) 
[2] [ h ttps:// k i ng inst itute.stanford.ed u /k i ng-
papers/doc uments /m y -. . . ](h ttp s://kingin st itute . stanfor d .e d u / kin g -
papers/docu ments/my-tr i p-l and-ga nd hi) 
----- -
our ca t 
Th e only reas on t he DailyMail ( a  demons t rably r acistpub lis hero fri ght -l ean i ng  li e s a nd propa ga nd a) wo uldp u b l ishthi s is  to c reate anger f rom  tho s e
w ho re gular ly r ea d it.  Since  ther e' s are a lot ofpeop le wouldn 'tag ree  w ith
t h is dec isi on. 

Also,  I find itod d t ha t this article isev e n  l inked on  'Hack e rNe w s'. It h as 
ze ro v a l ue to  our co mmunity(imho) . 
 
Newspa pe rs Los e$10  Do llars in P rint f or Every  $1 G a ined Online -b dking
http:// w ww . b us i ness wee k.com/news/ 2012 - 03-1 9/ne w sp ape r s-los e-10- do l la r s-in-print-for-ever y- digita l-1
======
campni c
This tit l e is misle adin g ,t he article sta rts:"U.S. news p apers lo st $1 0 in
pri nt advert i s ing reve nue  la styea r fo r every $1 th e y  gai ne d onlin e,a deepe r
l oss  th anin  2010, as  competi ti on  f ro m I ntern e t compan ie s i nc rea ses,a  study 
by P ew R es ea r chCenterf ou n d ." L os in g $1 0 o freven ue i s  di fferent  then los ing $10. 
~~ ~
mbett er
Not to men ti on the "do ll ars  dolla r s " redund ancy that made my lefte ye twit ch. 

~~~ 
ghu rlman
No,  th at's y our potass ium de ficie nc y.E a t a b a n an a.
- -----
ceej a y ozThe a lt erna tive, t hough, is losing $ 1 0 d ollars in pri ntfor$ 0  g ain e do nli ne . 

~ ~ ~ 
stephen_g
Exac tly. I rea ll y  s truggle to see  w hy comp anies a re of t en hesi tant to
c annibalis ethei r own  products- becaus e if they don't ,  s omebo dyelse w il l.. .
The  newsp a per s are  lucky  t o be m aking  t hat doll ar given how slow manyof
 a_path of_non violent civil rights
movement_with inspiration_from_Gandhi and_his_ideology of non-violence.

[1]
[https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-19...](https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/04/gandhi-1914-1948-ramachandra-
guha-review)

[2]_[https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-
papers/documents/my-...](https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-
papers/documents/my-trip-land-gandhi)

------
ourcat
The only reason_the Daily Mail (a_demonstrably racist publisher_of_right-
leaning lies and propaganda) would publish this is to create anger from those
who regularly_read_it. Since_there's_are_a lot of people wouldn't_agree with
this decision.

Also, I find_it odd_that this article is even linked on 'Hacker_News'._It has
zero value_to our community (imho).

 

Newspapers Lose $10 Dollars in_Print for Every $1 Gained Online_- bdking
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-19/newspapers-lose-10-dollars-in-print-for-every-digital-1

======
campnic
This title_is_misleading,_the article starts: "U.S._newspapers lost $10 in
print advertising revenue_last year for every $1 they_gained online, a deeper
loss than in 2010,_as competition from Internet companies increases,_a study
by Pew Research Center_found." Losing_$10 of revenue is different_then losing
$10.

~~~
mbetter
Not to_mention the_"dollars dollars" redundancy_that made my left eye twitch.

~~~
ghurlman
No,_that's your potassium_deficiency. Eat a banana.

------
ceejayoz
The alternative, though,_is_losing $10 dollars_in_print_for $0_gained online.

~~~
stephen_g
Exactly. I_really_struggle to_see_why companies are often hesitant to
cannibalise_their_own products - because if they don't,_somebody else will...
The newspapers_are_lucky to be making_that dollar given how slow_many of