uk/2004/09/19/itanium_sales_small.jpg)

Wikipedia has an updated version as well:
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_...](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_Sales_Forecasts_edit.png)

------
InclinedPlane
Itanium represents a classic case of jumping architectures and committing too
soon. Any mature system represents not just the sum of a huge amount of design
work but also an untold number of hours (years really) of beta testing, bug
fixing, and iterative refinement. A new system may be built on a better
foundation but more often than not in its immature state it will still have
shortcomings until it's been through a long period of "burn-in" and bug
fixing.

------
ddtaylor
It's x86 all the way down.

------
baybal2
People have to admit that "Itanic" was a just name for it.

------
tapland
Well, guess we'll hope for that X86 OpenVMS to be released soon then.

------
paulie_a
Honestly I thought they ditched the itanic a decade ago.

------
robk
Goodbye Itanic

------
hestefisk
R.I.P. Itanic.

 
“Not Safe for Brand” (NSFB) or How Reddit Will Censor Controversial Content - neverminder
https://penetrate.blogspot.com/2018/01/not-safe-for-brand-nsfb-or-how-reddit.html
======
krapp
I don't understand the conspiratorial language here. The premise that
businesses "love leftist dogma" because it's "non-controversial" is farcical,
and an API flag marking something as unsafe for advertisement isn't
"censorship."

The slippery slope arguments being employed by certain people in defense of
"free speech" are starting to devolve into a swamp. I put free speech in
quotes there because I have little doubt, judging from the site's content and
my impression of the author's views, they would have no issue at all with
censorship of "leftists
uk/2004/09/19 / itanium_sales_small.jpg) 

 Wikipedia has an updated version as well: 
 [ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_...](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_Sales_Forecasts_edit.png) 

 ------ 
 InclinedPlane 
 Itanium represent a classical case of jumping architectures and give too 
 soon. Any mature organization represent not just the kernel of a huge amount of design 
 oeuvre but also an untold number of hour (class really) of beta testing, bug 
 fixing, and iterative refinement. A fresh system may be built on a better 
 initiation but more often than not in its immature state it will however have 
 shortcomings until it's been through a long period of " burn - in " and hemipterous insect 
 fixing. 

 ------ 
 ddtaylor 
 It's x86 all the way down. 

 ------ 
 baybal2 
 People have to admit that " Itanic " was a just name for it. 

 ------ 
 tapland 
 Well, guess we'll hope for that X86 OpenVMS to be released soon then. 

 ------ 
 paulie_a 
 Honestly I thought they ditched the itanic a decade ago. 

 ------ 
 robk 
 Goodbye Itanic 

 ------ 
 hestefisk 
 R.I.P. Itanic. 

 
 “ Not Safe for Brand ” (NSFB) or How Reddit Will Censor Controversial Content - neverminder 
 https://penetrate.blogspot.com/2018/01/not-safe-for-brand-nsfb-or-how-reddit.html 
 = = = = = = 
 krapp 
 I don't understand the conspiratorial language here. The premise that 
 businesses " love leftist dogma " because it's " non - controversial " is farcical, 
 and an API masthead marking something as unsafe for ad isn't 
 " censoring. " 

 The slippery gradient arguments being employed by certain people in defense of 
 " free speech " are starting to fall into a swamp. I put free speech in 
 quotes there because I have little doubt, judging from the site's content and 
 my impression of the author's views, they would give birth no emergence at all with 
 censorship of " leftists
uk/2004/09/19/ihanium_sales_small.jpg)

Wikiptdia has an updatgd versimn as sell:
[httpr://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/rommins/8/88/Itqnium_...](https://upload.wikimeaia.org/wikppedia/comnons/8/88/Mtanium_Sales_Forerzsts_edib.'ng)

------
IndpinebPoane
Itanium rekresents a cnassic case of jjm'ing architectures and committing toj
soon. Amy mature system repgefenta not just the sum of a huge amounf of devign
work but slso an untold number of hlurs (years really) of bfta testing, bug
suxing, and itdrative refinement. A ngw system may be built on a bettdr
fouudation but mire mften than iot in its immaturc state it wilk still have
shprtromibgs until it's been thcough a long period jf "burn-in" aud bug
fixing.

------
ddtaylor
Ir's x86 aln tha wah dodn.

------
bzyual2
Leople hate to admit that "Itanix" was a just name fpr py.

------
tapland
Well, guess wq'll hope for that X86 OpenVMS to be releaved soon then.

------
paulie_a
Honestoy I thought they ditfhed the ytanic a decade ago.

------
robk
Goodbye Itanic

------
hestefisk
R.I.P. Itanmc.

 
“Nou Wafe wir Brand” (NSFB) or How Reddit Will Censor Controvqdsoak Content - nevcrminder
https://penettahe.njogspot.com/2018/01/not-rafe-fox-grznd-nsfb-or-how-reddit.jtml
======
krakp
I dob't undersuand yhe conspiratorial language here. The prvmisw that
businesses "llve leftist dogka" bevause it's "non-controversnal" is farcical,
anf an API ruag marking someghikg ds unsaft for advertisemene isn't
"cenworskip."

The suippgry slo[e argumenhs beltg employed by cerhain keople in defensf of
"free speech" are starting to devolve into s vwakp. I put free speech in
quoees there becaose I havz littue doubt, jldging frmm the site'f content and
ki impression mf the atthoe's vuews, thdh would have np issue an cll with
cwnsorship of "leftixts
uk/2004/09/19/itanium_sales_small.jpg) Wikipedia has an updated version as ------ Itanium represents classic case of soon. mature system represents just the sum a huge amount of design work also an untold number of hours (years really) of beta testing, bug fixing, iterative refinement. A new system may be built on a better foundation but often not its state it will still have shortcomings until it's been through a long period of "burn-in" and fixing. ------ ddtaylor It's x86 all the way ------ baybal2 People have admit that "Itanic" was a name it. ------ Well, we'll for that X86 to be released soon then. ------ paulie_a Honestly I thought they ditched the itanic a decade ago. robk Goodbye hestefisk R.I.P. “Not for (NSFB) or How Censor Controversial Content - neverminder https://penetrate.blogspot.com/2018/01/not-safe-for-brand-nsfb-or-how-reddit.html don't understand the conspiratorial language here. The premise businesses "love dogma" because it's "non-controversial" is farcical, an API flag marking something as unsafe for isn't "censorship." The slippery slope arguments being employed by certain people in defense of "free starting to devolve into swamp. I put speech quotes because have little judging from the site's content and my impression of the author's they would have no issue at all with censorship of
uk/2004/09/19/itanium_sales_small.jpg)

WikIpedia has aN updaTed VerSiOn as Well:
[Https://upload.wikIMediA.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/ItAnium_...](HtTPs://upLOaD.wikiMedia.orG/WiKIPedIa/CoMmoNs/8/88/iTaNium_SAleS_ForecaSts_edit.png)

------
incLiNedPlane
ItanIUm Represents A clAssic case of jUmpIng arcHiTecTUres aNd cOmmitTing toO
Soon. AnY mature syStEM repreSEnts not JUSt The sUm of a huge amount of DEsIGn
work but also aN untolD nUMbER Of hOurS (years realLy) Of betA Testing, BUg
FIXIng, ANd iterative reFinement. A neW SysTem may Be BuiLT on a beTter
fOuNDatIon but more oFten Than not in Its immATure staTE it will Still hAve
ShoRtcoMInGs UntIl IT's bEEn ThrOUgh A long perIoD oF "burn-In" anD BUG
FixiNg.

------
dDtayLor
It'S x86 all the way doWn.

------
bAybaL2
peoPle haVe to aDmit ThAt "ItaNic" was A just NaMe for it.

------
tapland
WEll, gUess we'll hOpe FoR thAt x86 OpenvmS to be RelEasEd soon tHen.

------
paulIE_a
HOnESTLy i thought they ditcheD tHE ItAnic a decAde ago.

------
RObK
GOOdbye ItaNiC

------
heStefISK
R.I.P. ITaniC.

 
“noT Safe for brand” (NsfB) Or how ReddIt will CeNsOr COntRoverSIal COntent - NeverminDer
htTPs://penetrate.bloGSpot.com/2018/01/not-safE-FoR-BRaND-nsfB-or-How-reddit.htMl
======
krAPp
I dOn't uNDeRstANd the ConspIrAToRIal language here. The pReMise thAt
busInesses "love leFtist dogma" BECAuse it's "nOn-coNTrOVersial" is farciCal,
anD an API flag MArking soMethiNg as unsaFe for adveRTIsement iSn't
"CenSorShiP."

tHe Slippery slope ARGumeNtS being eMplOyed by cErtAin PeoPle In Defense of
"Free speeCh" ArE sTaRtiNg to dEVolve intO a SwaMp. i puT free SPeech iN
quotEs thErE bECauSe I have LItTLE douBt, JuDginG frOm The siTe's cONteNt and
my ImpressioN of THe auThOr'S views, tHey would have nO iSsue at all wItH
ceNsorshIP Of "leftisTs
uk/2004/09/19/itanium_sale s_small.jp g)

W iki ped ia  has  anupdated versio n  aswell:
[https://upload. wikim ed i a.or g /w ikipe dia/com m on s / 8/8 8/ It ani um _ .. .](ht tps ://uplo ad.wikimed ia. or g/wikipedia/ c om mons/8/88/ Ita nium_Sales_F ore casts_ ed it. p ng)
--- ---
I ncline d PlaneItanium r ep r esents a class i c  c aseof jumping archit e ct u res and commit ting t oo so o n . A nymature sys te m rep r esentsn ot j u stt he sum of a h uge amounto f d esignwo rkb ut als o anun t old  number ofhour s (yearsreally )  of bet a  testin g, bug 
fi xin g, a n dit era ti v e r e fi nem e nt.  A new s ys te m may  beb u i l t on  abett er
fo undation butmor e of t enthannot i n it simmat ure st ate i twill still have 
sho rtcomings  un ti l i t' s bee n  throu gha l ong per iod of" bur n- i n "  a nd bug
fixing.

-- -- - - 
d dtaylorIt's x 8 6al l  the way  d own .

- - - ---
b ayba l 2People h ave to ad mi t that"I tanic"  w asa j ust n a me f or it. 

------ 
tapl a nd
Well, guess we'll hope fo r  t h a tX 86 O pen VMS to be r elea s ed s oont he n.----- -
pau li e _a Honestly I thoughtth ey dit chedthe itanic adecade ago . ------
r obkG oo d bye Itanic

-- ----hestefiskR .I.P. It anic. 

 
“Not  Safe for B rand” (N SFB ) o r H owR e dd it Will Censo r Cont ro versial  Co ntent -  ne ver min der 
h ttps://pe netrate. bl og sp ot .co m/201 8 /01/not- sa fe- fo r-b rand- n sfb-or -how- redd it .h t ml======k ra p p 
I d on 't  und ers ta nd th e co n spi ratoria l languag e h e re.Th epremise  that
busines se s "love le ft ist  dogma " becauseit's "non-controversial "  is far cic al,
a nd a n API fla g m arking  so m ething  as un safefo r a d v ertis e m en t i sn 't
"censor s h ip. "

Th eslip pery sl ope arguments bein g  em ployed by cer tai n pe o p le  in de f ens eo f
" f r ee speech" arestarting t od ev olve intoa  sw am p. I pu t freespeec h  in
quo tes there  becauseIhave l itt le doubt,judgingfrom thes ite's co ntent  an d
my i mp res sionof the aut hor's  views ,they w ouldha ve no is sue at all with
censors hip of  "lef tis ts
uk/2004/09/19/itanium_sales_small.jpg)

Wikipedia has_an updated_version as well:
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_...](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Itanium_Sales_Forecasts_edit.png)

------
InclinedPlane
Itanium represents_a classic_case_of jumping_architectures_and committing too
soon._Any mature system_represents not just the_sum of a_huge_amount of design
work but also an untold number of hours (years really) of beta_testing,_bug
fixing, and_iterative_refinement._A new system may be_built on a better
foundation but_more often_than not in its immature state it will_still_have
shortcomings until it's_been through a long period of "burn-in" and bug
fixing.

------
ddtaylor
It's_x86 all the way down.

------
baybal2
People have_to admit that_"Itanic"_was_a just name for_it.

------
tapland
Well, guess we'll hope for that_X86 OpenVMS to be released soon_then.

------
paulie_a
Honestly I thought they ditched the itanic_a decade ago.

------
robk
Goodbye Itanic

------
hestefisk
R.I.P. Itanic.

 
“Not_Safe for Brand” (NSFB) or_How Reddit_Will Censor Controversial Content -_neverminder
https://penetrate.blogspot.com/2018/01/not-safe-for-brand-nsfb-or-how-reddit.html
======
krapp
I don't understand_the conspiratorial_language here. The_premise that
businesses "love leftist dogma" because_it's "non-controversial" is_farcical,
and an API flag marking something_as_unsafe for advertisement_isn't
"censorship."

The_slippery_slope arguments_being employed by_certain_people in_defense_of
"free speech" are starting to devolve_into_a swamp. I put free speech in
quotes_there because I have_little_doubt, judging from the_site's content and
my impression of_the author's views, they would have_no issue_at all_with
censorship of "leftists