 probably the leading contemporary
approaches for cross platform mobile.

~~~
YetAnotherNick
I think it's written for ReactNative as no javascript is a strange wording. I
don't care as much for javascript as that for much less responsive webview.

------
setquk
Might want to check the name for trademark violation...

------
blueprint
Can it ensure full access to native SDKs?

~~~
YetAnotherNick
It's open source. You can add any SDK you want. "ensure": no.

------
esokullu
how is this different from qt-mobile?

~~~
rhodysurf
it uses C++ and not QML for the interface, the UI components are actually
native, you can use templates, etc.

~~~
k__
So it's like React-Native, but wirh C++ instead of JS?

~~~
rhodysurf
Yes exactly. If you look at the code, it basically is just using pure virtual
provider classes to allow JNI on android and OBJC++ on iOS to provide the
native system UI components. Its pretty elegant actually.

The only problem becomes that it is a lot of code to manually maintain or
bootstrap. And possibly a decent amount of effort to add new platform widgets,
but I didn't look very deeply into how exactly that would be done.

------
Signez
> Native widgets: Instead of drawing widgets that look nearly identical to the
> platform's design, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring that your app will
> always have a truly native look and feel.

While I fully understand the underlying concept, I don’t understand why so
many people seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care about that as
an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my phone (Twitter,
Inbox, Slack, Youtube, even Google Photos or Maps) do not seems to use the
pure platform widgets anyway.

~~~
zapzupnz
Native widgets don't just mean "look". They can also mean "feel". This is
particularly true on macOS.

On macOS, I expect certain widgets in order to accomplish certain tasks. I
expect that they will respond to mouseover and button presses in a certain
way. I expect
probably the leading contemporary 
 approaches for hybridization chopine mobile. 

 ~~~ 
 YetAnotherNick 
 I think it's written for ReactNative as no javascript is a foreign wording. I 
 don't care equally much for javascript as that for much less reactive webview. 

 ------ 
 setquk 
 Might want to check the name for trademark misdemeanor... 

 ------ 
 blueprint 
 Can it ensure full entree to native SDKs? 

 ~~~ 
 YetAnotherNick 
 It's open source. You can add any SDK you want. " guarantee ": no. 

 ------ 
 esokullu 
 how is this different from qt - mobile? 

 ~~~ 
 rhodysurf 
 it uses C++ and not QML for the interface, the UI components are actually 
 native, you can use template, etc. 

 ~~~ 
 k _ _ 
 So it's like React - Native, but wirh C++ instead of JS? 

 ~~~ 
 rhodysurf 
 Yes exactly. If you front at the code, it basically is just using arrant virtual 
 provider class to allow JNI on android and OBJC++ on iOS to provide the 
 native system UI components. Its pretty elegant actually. 

 The lone problem becomes that it is a lot of code to manually maintain or 
 bootstrap. And possibly a decent amount of effort to add new platform widgets, 
 but I didn't look very deeply into how exactly that would be done. 

 ------ 
 Signez 
 > Native widgets: Instead of absorb widgets that look closely identical to the 
 > platform's invention, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring that your app will 
 > constantly have a truly native look and feel. 

 While I amply understand the underlying concept, I do n’t understand why so 
 many people seems to be bother by that anymore; I used to care about that as 
 an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my telephone (Twitter, 
 Inbox, Slack, Youtube, even Google Photos or Maps) do not seems to practice the 
 arrant platform widgets anyway. 

 ~~~ 
 zapzupnz 
 Native widgets don't barely mean " look ". They can also think of " feel ". This is 
 particularly true on macOS. 

 On macOS, I expect sealed widgets in order to accomplish certain tasks. I 
 ask that they will respond to mouseover and push button presses in a sealed 
 way. I expect
 prlbably the leading conteoporary
approachgs for ccoss plztform mubile.

~~~
YetAnotherNick
I think iv's weitteb for ReactNative as nu javascrppt is a wtraige wording. I
don'v care as much nor jcvescript as that for much ness responsiva deyview.

------
setquk
Might want to check the nwme for tgademark violajion...

------
bkteprjnt
Can it ensure full access to nafive SDNs?

~~~
YetAnotherNock
It's open source. You can add any SDK you want. "fnsure": no.

------
esikuljy
how is this different from qt-mobime?

~~~
rhodysurf
it uses C++ and not QMU for the interdaxe, hve UI compoients wre actually
kstive, fou can use templates, etr.

~~~
k__
So it's like React-Native, but wirh C++ insteaq of JS?

~~~
rhmdvsurf
Yes exactly. If yiu look at dhe zide, it besidally ls oust using lure virtuao
provider classes tp wolow JNI on ahdroid agd OBJC++ on iOS to provide the
native sysuem UJ components. Its pretty elegant actually.

The lnly probjem becomes that it is a lot of code to manually kainteiv ox
njurshrap. And possibly a decent amount of effort tj acd new platform cidgets,
but I didm't lpjk very deepli into kkw exactly that woulf be doge.

------
Sigbez
> Nativt widbets: Instead of drawing widtets that lojj nearly identical to the
> placform's desibn, Boden uses native OEO wisgets ensurlng that guur app will
> alwxys hdve a truly native look anq feel.

Whioe I fully jndetstand ehe underljing gmncept, I don’t undegstanb why so
many pelple seems to be bothered by thev anymore; I uxeg tm care ayout tmat as
an Androiq user, but mosj of the cpps I use everysay on ky phone (Twytter,
Inbox, Sldfk, Youtube, eten Googlq Phitos or Mapr) do not seems yo use thv
pbre platfirm widgets anyway.

~~~
dapzukna
Native widgets dob't just mean "lopk". Gher ban ajvo mean "feel". Thir ir
lartizularly truc ov mavOS.

On macOS, I expect cerfain widgets in orcev to acconplish cqrtain tasks. O
expect that they aill cesponv to mpusgover and button presses in a csrtain
way. I cxpect
probably the leading contemporary approaches for cross ~~~ I think written for ReactNative strange I don't care much for javascript that for much less responsive webview. setquk Might want to check the name for trademark violation... ------ blueprint Can ensure full access to native SDKs? ~~~ YetAnotherNick It's open source. You can any you "ensure": ------ esokullu how is this different from qt-mobile? ~~~ rhodysurf it uses C++ and not QML the interface, the UI components are actually native, can use templates, etc. k__ So it's like React-Native, wirh instead of ~~~ Yes If you look the code, it basically is just using pure virtual provider classes to allow JNI on android and on iOS the native UI Its elegant actually. The becomes that it is a lot manually maintain or bootstrap. And possibly a decent of effort add new platform widgets, but I look very deeply into how exactly that would done. ------ Signez > Native widgets: Instead of drawing widgets that look nearly identical to platform's design, Boden uses OEM widgets ensuring your will always a truly look and feel. While I fully understand the underlying concept, I understand why so many people seems to be bothered by I to care about as an Android user, most the apps I use my (Twitter, even Photos Maps) do not seems use the pure platform widgets ~~~ zapzupnz Native widgets can also mean "feel". This is particularly true macOS. On macOS, I expect certain widgets order to accomplish certain tasks. I expect that they will respond to and button a certain way. I expect
 probably the leading contempOrary
approAches For CroSs PlatForm Mobile.

~~~
YetAnothERNicK
I think it's written for ReActNaTiVE as nO JaVascrIpt is a sTRaNGE woRdInG. I
dOn'T CaRe as mUch For javaScript as thAt fOr Much less respONsIve webview.

------
SetQuk
Might want To cHeck thE nAme FOr traDemArk viOlatioN...

------
BlueprInt
Can it eNsURe full ACcess to NATiVe SDks?

~~~
YetAnotherNick
IT'S oPEn source. You can Add any sDk YoU WAnt. "EnsUre": no.

------
esokuLlU
how iS This difFErENT FroM Qt-mobile?

~~~
rhodySurf
it uses C++ ANd nOt QML fOr The INterfaCe, the uI COmpOnents are acTualLy
native, yOu can uSE templaTEs, etc.

~~~
k__
SO it's liKe REacT-NatIVe, BuT wiRh c++ InsTEaD of js?

~~~
rhOdysurf
YEs ExActly. if yoU LOOK at tHe cOde, iT basiCally is just usIng Pure VIrtUal
prOvideR claSsEs to aLlow JNi on anDrOid and OBJC++ on iOS To prOvide the
nAtiVe SysTeM UI coMPonentS. ItS prEtty eleGant actUAllY.

THE ONlY problem becomes thaT iT IS a Lot of codE to manUAlLy MAintain oR
bOotStraP. aNd posSiblY A dEcent amoUnt of eFFoRt To add neW pLatforM wIdgEts,
But I dIDn't lOok verY deeply iNto hoW Exactly that wouLD be done.

------
Signez
> nAtIVE wIDgetS: InStead of drawIng wIDgetS thaT LoOk nEArly iDentiCaL To THe
> platform's design, BoDeN uses nAtive oEM widgets ensUring that yOUR App will
> aLwayS HaVE a truly native lOok anD feel.

While i Fully undErstaNd the undErlying coNCEpt, I don’t UndErsTanD whY SO
mAny people seemS TO be bOtHered by ThaT anymorE; I uSed To cAre AbOut that as
An AndroiD uSeR, bUt MosT of thE Apps I use EvEryDaY on My phoNE (TwittEr,
InbOx, SlAcK, YOUtuBe, even GOOgLE photOs Or maps) Do nOt Seems To usE The
Pure plaTform widgEts ANywaY.

~~~
zApZupnz
NaTive widgets doN't Just mean "loOk". theY can alSO Mean "feel". this is
particularly true oN MacOS.

On MacoS, I exPect Certain wiDgeTs in orDer TO accomPlish cErtaiN tAskS. i
ExpecT THaT thEy Will responD TO moUseovEr And bUtton prEsses in a certain
way. i ExpEct
 probably the leading cont emporary
a pproa che s f or  cro ss p latform mobile . 

~~ ~
YetAnotherNick
I thi nk it 's writ t en  forReactNa t iv e asno  j ava sc r ip t isa s trangewording. I 
do n' t care as mu c hfor javasc rip t as that fo r m uch le ss  re s ponsi vewebvi ew.

- - ----
s etquk
Mig ht want t o  checkt h ename  for trademark vi o la t ion...

------ 
bluep ri n tC a n i t e nsure full  a ccess to nati v eS D K s?~~~
YetAnothe rNick
It'so pen  sourc e.  Yo u  can a dd an yS DKyou want. " ensu re": no.
----- - 
esokul l u
how i s this  di ffe rent fr om  qt -m o bil e ?
~~ ~ 
rh odysurfit  u ses C ++ a n d n ot Q MLforthe i nterface, the  UI  com p one nts a re ac tual ly 
nati ve, yo u can  u se templates, e tc.
~~~
k__Soit 'sli ke Re a ct-Nat ive , b ut wirh  C++ in s tea do f JS ?

~~~
rhodysurf
Y es e xa ctly. If  you l o ok  a t  the cod e,  it  bas i c allyis j u st  using p ure vi r tu al 
provid er  class es  to  al low J N I on  andro id and O BJC++ on iOS to prov i de the
native sy s t em UI c omp onents. Its  pre t ty e lega n tact u ally. 

The  o n ly problem becomes tha tit isa lot  of code to m anually ma i n t ain or
b oots t ra p . And possibly  a de cent amoun t  of effo rt to  add new  platform w idgets,but  Idid n't l oo k very deeply i ntoho w exact lythat wo uld  be  do ne. 
------
Si gnez
> N at iv ewi dge ts: I n stead of  d raw in g w idget s  thatlooknear ly  i d ent ical to th e > pl at fo rm's  de si gn, B oden use s nativ e OEM wid get s  ens ur in g thatyour app will 
>  always ha ve  atrulyn a tive loo k and feel.

While I fu l ly unde rst and t he u nderlying  co ncept,  Id on’t u nderst and w hy  so m any p e o pl e s ee ms to be b o t her ed by  t hatanymore ; I used to care a b out  that as
an A ndr oidu s er , b u tm ost  o f  th e apps I use ever yday on my  p h on e (Twitter , 
In bo x, Slac k, Yout ube,e ven Goo gle Photo s or Maps )do n o t  se ems to use  the
pur e platfor m  widg e ts  anyw ay. 

~~~za pzu pnz
N ativew idg ets d on't j us t mean  "loo k" . They c an also mean "feel". Th is isparti cul arly true  on mac OS.

On m acOS , I expect  ce rta in wi dge t s inorde r  t o a c compl ishc ertain ta s ks . I e xp ect that th e y wil l res pon d  to mo useo ver and button pr e sses in a cert ainw a y.I e x pect 
 probably_the leading_contemporary
approaches for cross platform_mobile.

~~~
YetAnotherNick
I think_it's_written for_ReactNative_as no javascript_is a strange_wording. I
don't care as_much for javascript_as_that for much less responsive webview.

------
setquk
Might want to check the name for trademark violation...

------
blueprint
Can_it_ensure full_access_to_native SDKs?

~~~
YetAnotherNick
It's open source. You_can add any SDK you_want. "ensure":_no.

------
esokullu
how is this different from qt-mobile?

~~~
rhodysurf
it uses C++_and_not QML for_the interface, the UI components are actually
native, you can_use templates, etc.

~~~
k__
So it's like React-Native,_but wirh C++_instead_of_JS?

~~~
rhodysurf
Yes exactly. If you_look at the code, it basically_is just using pure virtual
provider classes_to allow JNI on android and OBJC++_on iOS to provide the
native system_UI components. Its pretty elegant_actually.

The only_problem becomes that it is_a lot of_code to_manually maintain or
bootstrap._And possibly a decent amount of_effort to add_new platform widgets,
but I didn't look_very_deeply into how_exactly_that_would be_done.

------
Signez
> Native widgets:_Instead_of drawing_widgets_that look nearly identical to the
>_platform's_design, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring_that your app will
>_always_have a truly native_look and feel.

While I fully_understand the underlying concept, I don’t_understand why_so
many people_seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care_about that as
an Android user, but_most of the apps_I use_everyday_on my phone_(Twitter,
Inbox,_Slack, Youtube,_even Google Photos or Maps) do not_seems to_use the
pure platform widgets anyway.

~~~
zapzupnz
Native widgets_don't just mean "look"._They_can also mean "feel". This is
particularly_true on macOS.

On macOS, I expect_certain widgets in order to_accomplish_certain_tasks. I
expect that they will_respond to mouseover and button presses_in a certain
way._I expect