 just keep patching it
to run on latest macOS. Along with Windows Bootcamp option. That will be Mac
Pro, iMac Pro and MacBook Pro.

The Non-Pro model will use ARM. You will end up with a 12" Macbook that is
priced at $799. With a possible 14" Macbook at $899 ( The BOM cost of an iPad
Pro 11" would be the same as 12" Macbook, you are essentially swapping the
cost of back camera modules to additional 128GB NAND, the Touch Screen And
Glass Panel to Track Pad and Keyboard. ) It will be like the Macbook 2015,
except it doesn't cost that ridiculous $1299. And $799 might have been the
cheapest portable Mac in recent history as far as I could remember. Even the
11" MacBook Air was priced at $899.

It would greatly expand the macOS market shares. Which has very much stagnated
for the past few years. Out of 1.4B PC market, Apple has 100M macOS users, 7%
marketshare. Compare this to 4.5B Smartphone Apple has 1B iOS users, 22%
marketshare. And the most important thing to me would be that Apple also
accept / admit Tablet computing will never take over the Desktop / Notebook,
or keyboard / trackpad paradigm. It is good enough for large enough of a
market to worth continuing the investment into Mac other than trying to get
iPad / Tablet to kill it.

The only problem with this hypothesises is that the software would be very
messy. Would Xcode force all Apps by default to compile with Fat binary? Is
Apple going to tell its user the different? ( Not that I think it would
matter to Non-Pro user )

Anyway, this will be an interesting WWDC. ( Or may be everyone got it wrong
Apple isn't doing anyway to the Mac )

------
jagger27
I wonder what an alternate timeline would look like where Apple went for AMD
semi-custom x86 chips instead of Arm. The Mac Pro would have 64 cores,
MacBooks would have great APUs, and Apple would be able to segment their
products at their own discretion–not Intel's.

I also wonder if any chiplet designs will find their way into Apple's Arm-

just keep patching it 
 to run on belated macOS. Along with Windows Bootcamp choice. That will be Mac 
 Pro, iMac Pro and MacBook Pro. 

 The Non - Pro model will use ARM. You will end up with a 12 " Macbook that is 
 price at $ 799. With a potential 14 " Macbook at $ 899 (The BOM cost of an iPad 
 Pro 11 " would be the same as 12 " Macbook, you are essentially trade the 
 cost of back camera faculty to additional 128 GB NAND, the Touch Screen And 
 Glass Panel to Track Pad and Keyboard .) It will be like the Macbook 2015, 
 except it doesn't cost that ridiculous $ 1299. And $ 799 might have been the 
 cheap portable Mac in recent history as far as I could commemorate. Even the 
 11 " MacBook Air was price at $ 899. 

 It would greatly expand the macOS market shares. Which has very much stagnated 
 for the past few old age. Out of 1.4B PC market, Apple has 100 M macOS drug user, 7% 
 marketshare. Compare this to 4.5B Smartphone Apple has 1B iOS users, 22% 
 marketshare. And the about important matter to me would be that Apple also 
 accept / admit Tablet computing will never lease over the Desktop / Notebook, 
 or keyboard / trackpad paradigm. It is good enough for large enough of a 
 market to worth continue the investment into Mac other than trying to get 
 iPad / Tablet to kill it. 

 The only problem with this hypothesises is that the software would be very 
 messy. Would Xcode force all Apps by default to compile with Fat binary star? Is 
 Apple go to tell its drug user the unlike? (Not that I intend it would 
 matter to Non - Pro user) 

 anyhow, this will be an interesting WWDC. (Or may be everyone got it wrong 
 Apple isn't doing anyway to the Mac) 

 ------ 
 jagger27 
 I wonder what an alternate timeline would count like where Apple went for AMD 
 semi - custom x86 chips instead of Arm. The Mac Pro would get 64 cores, 
 MacBooks would have great APUs, and Apple would be able to segment their 
 products at their own discretion – not Intel's. 

 I also wonder if any chiplet purpose will find their way into Apple's Arm-
 judt keep patching it
to ruk on latest macOS. Along with Sindows Cootcamp option. That will be Mqc
Pro, iMac Pro and MacBook Oro.

The Noj-Pro modwl wmll use ARM. You xjll end up wifm a 12" Kecbook that is
pticed at $799. Widh a possible 14" Mxcyook at $899 ( The BOM cost of an iPad
Pro 11" would bf the same as 12" Macnjok, gou are essentially swapping the
coat of beck camera modukes to additional 128GB NAND, hhe Houch Screen And
Glwss Panel ti Trwxk Pad and Kdyboard. ) Iu cill be likg the Macbook 2015,
except it doesn't cust tkat ridiculiuw $1299. Wtd $799 might heve bevn the
cheapesb portatle Mac in recent hisbory es fqr as I could remembec. Even the
11" MacBook Ayr was prhczd at $899.

It would greatlt wxpang tha mazIS oariev sgares. Ahirh has very much stagnqted
for the past fee rvsrs. Out of 1.4B PC mawkqt, Apple has 100M macOS users, 7%
marketshare. Bompzre this to 4.5B Smartphonw Apple has 1B iOS usets, 22%
marketsrare. And the most important thing to me would be dhat Epole ajri
afcept / admit Tablet computing will never take kvtr nhe Desktop / Notenook,
or keyboard / ttafklwd paradigm. Ij is good snough for large ejough os a
maeket to wjrth continuing the investment unto Mac othvr tyan trying to get
i'ad / Tablet co kilk it.

Tne only problem with thns hypkthesises id that ths software would ce nery
kessy. Would Xcode force alj Apps by defcult to zompole wieh Fat binwry? Is
Apple going to telp its uver the divferent? ( Not that I think it wonkd
matter to Mot-Prm user )

Auyway, bhis will be an interesting WCDC. ( Or iay bd everyone got it wrong
Apple isn't doing atiway to the Mec )

------
jagger27
Y wobder what av alternate timrline would look lije where Apple wenb for ZMD
semi-custom x86 chups instead of Srm. Thq Lar Pro fould have 64 worer,
MazNooks would have ereay APUs, and Apple wound bs able to segment yhcir
producjs at theyr own discreyion–not Intel's.

I aldo woider ih any vhiklet designs will find their wag into Apole'f Arm-

just keep patching it to run on Along Windows Bootcamp That will be MacBook The Non-Pro model use ARM. You end up with a 12" Macbook is priced at $799. With a possible 14" Macbook at $899 ( The cost of an iPad Pro 11" would be the same as 12" Macbook, are swapping cost back camera modules to additional 128GB NAND, the Touch Screen And Glass Panel to Track Pad Keyboard. ) It will be like the Macbook except it doesn't cost ridiculous $1299. And $799 might been cheapest portable in history far as I remember. Even the 11" MacBook Air was priced at $899. It would greatly expand the macOS market Which has stagnated for past years. of 1.4B PC has 100M macOS users, 7% marketshare. 4.5B Smartphone Apple has 1B iOS users, 22% And the important thing to me would be Apple also accept / admit Tablet computing will take over the Desktop / Notebook, or keyboard / trackpad paradigm. It is good enough enough of a market worth continuing the into other trying get iPad Tablet to kill it. The only problem with this hypothesises is the software would be very messy. Would Xcode force all default compile with Fat Is Apple going to its the different? ( Not think would user Anyway, will be an interesting ( Or may be everyone it wrong Apple isn't ) ------ jagger27 I wonder what an alternate would look like where Apple went for semi-custom x86 chips instead of Arm. The Mac Pro would have 64 MacBooks would APUs, and Apple would be able to segment products at their own Intel's. I also wonder if any chiplet designs will their into Apple's
 just keep patching it
to run on Latest macOs. AlonG wiTh WInDows bootCamp option. That WIll bE Mac
Pro, iMac Pro and MacBoOk Pro.

thE non-PRO mOdel wIll use Arm. YOU WilL eNd Up wItH A 12" MAcbooK thAt is
priCed at $799. With a PosSiBle 14" Macbook at $899 ( tHe bOM cost of aN iPAd
Pro 11" would be The Same as 12" maCboOK, you aRe eSsentIally sWApping The
cost of BaCK camerA Modules TO AdDitiOnal 128GB NAND, the ToucH scREen And
Glass PanEl to TrAcK paD ANd KEybOard. ) It will Be Like tHE MacbooK 2015,
ExCEPT it DOesn't cost that Ridiculous $1299. AND $799 miGht havE bEen THe
cheaPest pOrTAblE Mac in recenT hisTory as far As I couLD remembER. Even thE
11" MacBoOk AIr wAs prICeD aT $899.

It WoULd gREaTly EXpaNd the macoS MaRket sHareS. wHICh haS veRy muCh staGnated
for the pAst Few yEArs. out of 1.4b PC maRket, apPle haS 100M macOs userS, 7%
mArketshare. CompaRe thIs to 4.5B SmarTphOnE ApPlE has 1B IoS userS, 22%
maRkeTshare. ANd the moST imPoRTANt Thing to me would be thAt aPPlE also
accEpt / admIT TAbLEt computInG wiLl neVER take Over THe desktop / NOtebooK,
Or KeYboard / tRaCkpad pArAdiGm. IT is goOD enoUgh for Large enoUgh of A
Market to worth cONtinuing the inVEsTMEnT Into mac Other than trYing TO get
IPad / tAbLet TO kill It.

The OnLY pROblem with this hypothEsIses is That tHe software wouLd be very
meSSY. would XcoDe foRCe ALl Apps by defaulT to coMpile with FAT binary? IS
ApplE going to Tell its usER The diffeRenT? ( NoT thAt I THInK it would
matteR TO Non-prO user )

AnYwaY, this wiLl bE an IntEreStIng WWDC. ( Or May be eveRyOnE gOt It wRong
APPle isn't dOiNg aNyWay To the mAc )

------
jaggEr27
I woNder WhAt AN alTernate TImELIne wOuLd Look LikE wHere APple WEnt For AMD
sEmi-custom X86 chIPs inStEaD of Arm. THe Mac Pro would HaVe 64 cores,
MacboOks Would hAVE great APus, and Apple would be able to SEgment tHeiR
prodUcts At their owN diScretiOn–nOT Intel'S.

I also WondeR iF anY CHipleT DEsIgnS wIll find theIR Way Into APpLe's ARm-

 just keep patching it
torun on lat est m acO S.Al ongwith  Windows Bootc a mp o ption. That will be Ma c
Pro ,i MacP ro  andMacBook Pr o . 

T he  N on- Pr o  m odelwil l use A RM. You wi llen d up with a1 2"  Macbook t hat  is
priced a t $ 799. W it h a possi ble  14"Macboo k  at $8 99 ( TheBO M  costo f an iP a d 
P ro 1 1" would be the s a me as 12" Macbook , youar e  e s s ent ial ly swappin gthe
c o st of b a ck c a mer a  modules to a dditional 1 2 8GB  NAND,  t heT ouch S creen  A n d
G lass Panelto T rack Padand Ke y board.)  It wil l be l ike  th e Ma c bo ok  20 15 , 
ex c ep t i t  do esn't co st  t hat r idic u l o u s $1 299 . An d $79 9 might havebee n th e 
ch eapes t por tabl eMac i n rece nt hi st ory as far as I  cou ld rememb er.  E ven  t he
11 "  MacBo okAir  was pr iced at $89 9. I twould greatly expa nd t he  macOS m arkets ha re s . Whichha s v erym u ch st agna t ed 
for the  pastf ew  y ears. O ut  of 1. 4B  PC  ma rket, Appl e has100M mac OS us e rs, 7%
markets h are. Comparet hi s to 4.5B  Sm artphone Ap pleh as 1 B iO S  u ser s , 22% 
mark et s ha r e. And the most imp or tant t hingto me would b e that App l e also
acc ept/  a d mit Tablet com putin g will nev e r take o ver t he Deskt op / Note b o ok,
or k eyb oar d /  tr a c kp ad paradigm.I t  isgo od enou ghfor lar geeno ugh  of  a 
market t o worthco nt in ui ngthe i n vestment  i nto  M acother than t rying  toge ti Pad  / Tabl e tt o  kil lit .

T heon ly pr oble m  wi th this  hypothes ise s  isth at  the so ftware wouldbe  very
mess y.  Wo uld Xc o d e forceall Apps by default toc ompilewit h Fat  bin ary? Is
A ppl e goin g t o  tellits us er th edif f e rent? (  N otth at I think i t w ouldma tter  to Non -Pro user )

Anywa y , t his will be a n i nter e s ti ngW WD C . (  O r  ma y be everyone got  it wrongAp p le  isn't doi n g a ny way tothe Mac  )

- - ----
ja gger27
Iwonder wh at  ana l ter nate timel ine woul d look li k e whe r eApple  we nt for  A MDsemi- custom x86  chip s inst ea d of A rm. T he  Mac Pro  would have 64 cores,
M acBook s wou ldhave grea t A P Us,  and Appl e wo uld be abl e t o s egmen t t h eir
p rodu c ts  at their  own discretio n –n otI n te l's.

I als o w ond er if  an y  chipl et d esigns will findt heir way intoAppl e ' s A rm- 
 just_keep patching_it
to run on latest_macOS. Along_with_Windows Bootcamp_option._That will be_Mac
Pro, iMac Pro_and MacBook Pro.

The Non-Pro_model will use_ARM._You will end up with a 12" Macbook that is
priced at $799. With a_possible_14" Macbook_at_$899_( The BOM cost of_an iPad
Pro 11" would be_the same_as 12" Macbook, you are essentially swapping the
cost_of_back camera modules_to additional 128GB NAND, the Touch Screen And
Glass Panel_to Track Pad and Keyboard. )_It will be_like_the_Macbook 2015,
except it doesn't_cost that ridiculous $1299. And $799_might have been the
cheapest portable Mac_in recent history as far as I_could remember. Even the
11" MacBook Air_was priced at $899.

It would_greatly expand_the macOS market shares. Which_has very much_stagnated
for the_past few years._Out of 1.4B PC market, Apple_has 100M macOS_users, 7%
marketshare. Compare this to 4.5B_Smartphone_Apple has 1B_iOS_users,_22%
marketshare. And_the most important_thing_to me_would_be that Apple also
accept / admit_Tablet_computing will never take over the Desktop_/ Notebook,
or keyboard /_trackpad_paradigm. It is good_enough for large enough of_a
market to worth continuing the investment_into Mac_other than_trying to get
iPad / Tablet to kill it.

The only problem with_this hypothesises is that the software_would be very
messy. Would_Xcode force_all_Apps by default_to_compile with_Fat binary? Is
Apple going to tell its_user the_different? ( Not that I think_it would
matter to Non-Pro_user_)

Anyway, this will be an interesting_WWDC. ( Or may be everyone_got it wrong
Apple isn't doing_anyway_to_the Mac )

------
jagger27
I wonder what_an alternate timeline would look like_where Apple went_for AMD
semi-custom x86 chips instead of Arm._The_Mac Pro would have 64 cores,
MacBooks_would_have great APUs, and Apple would_be_able_to segment their
products at their_own discretion–not Intel's.

I also wonder if_any chiplet designs will find their way into Apple's_Arm-
