 Patterns&quot; (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Design_Patterns) but for web front-end HTML&#x2F;CSS.<p>I&#x27;ve read Duckett&#x27;s book (Amazon bestseller) and its just syntax. Also, I&#x27;ve read the Atomic CSS design and BEM methodologies, and while those come close to what I want, I&#x27;m looking for a more detailed treatment. 
To give an obvious example of what I&#x27;m looking for- I would say, use margins to separate multiple instances of same components (among other uses). I wonder if there are books that deal with similar, but non-obvious topics.
======
meesterdude
Its not as rigid as software design patterns, and I think that's by design.

I'll try to share some tips - hopefully this is the kinda thing you're after -
i recognize some of it might not be on topic.

* use html partials to reduce complexity

* think about cachability and rendering needs - sometimes a simple display feature can have huge ramifications on code required and complexity

* semantic markup is optional, but definetly helps break up a sea of divs, and is good for people who use screen readers

* decouple your HTML from your CSS - if something is to be blue or big, it should be from the CSS, not because it has a "big" or 'blue" class. (see: csszengarden.com)

* scss & co are really useful, but be careful to not go overboard.

* don't assume what fonts your users have - linux, mac, win all differ. if unsure, check all 3 platforms rendering

* load JS at the bottom of the page to prevent render blocking (vs. in the head)

* always test browser size reflow & zoom rendering

* always test css,html, js validations

* test design in grayscale/color blindness simulations

* be aware of browser compatibility and vendor prefixing needs - its not cookie cutter.

* flexbox is new on the block, but it's dreamy to work with and is great for layout (shoutout to flexboxin5.com for
Patterns&quot; (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Design_Patterns) but for web front - end HTML&#x2F;CSS.<p > I&#x27;ve read Duckett&#x27;s book (Amazon best seller) and its good syntax. Also, I&#x27;ve read the Atomic CSS invention and BEM methodology, and while those come close to what I desire, I&#x27;m looking for a more detailed treatment. 
 To give an obvious model of what I&#x27;m looking for- I would say, practice margins to separate multiple instances of same component (among other uses). I wonder if there are books that deal with alike, but non - obvious topics. 
 = = = = = = 
 meesterdude 
 Its not as rigid as software invention patterns, and I think that's by design. 

 I'll test to share some tips - hopefully this is the kinda thing you're after - 
 i recognize some of it might not be on topic. 

 * practice html partials to reduce complexity 

 * think about cachability and rendering needs - sometimes a childlike display feature can have huge ramifications on code required and complexity 

 * semantic markup is optional, but definetly helps break up a sea of divs, and is good for people who use screen reader 

 * decouple your HTML from your cesium - if something is to be aristocratic or adult, it should be from the CSS, not because it has a " boastful " or' blue " class. (see: csszengarden.com) 

 * scss & co are really utilitarian, but be careful to not go overboard. 

 * don't assume what fonts your users have - linux, mac, win all differ. if unsure, check all 3 platforms rendering 

 * load JS at the bottom of the page to prevent render blocking (vs. in the head) 

 * constantly test browser size reflow & rapid climb rendering 

 * always test css, html, js validations 

 * test invention in grayscale / color blindness simulations 

 * be aware of browser compatibility and seller prefixing need - its not cookie cutter. 

 * flexbox is new on the auction block, but it's dreamy to work with and is capital for layout (shoutout to flexboxin5.com for
 Pahterns&quot; (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wiklpedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2Y;Eesign_'atterna) but fof web front-end HTML&#x2F;CSS.<p>I&#x27;vx reqd Duxkett&#x27;s book (Amazon bertseller) wnd its hust wyntax. Also, I&#x27;ve rccd ths Atokmc CSS design akd BEM methmdologies, and fhklz those come close to what I want, I&#x27;i lookimg for a more dejailec treznmtnt. 
To give an obvious example of what I&#q27;m looking for- I eould say, use margins to sfparwte multiple instajces of samg coiponents (amone other usts). I wonder jf there are books that deal wigh sikilar, but bob-obghous topics.
======
neestvrdude
Its not as rigig as sogtware design iattecns, qnd I think that's by vesign.

I'll try to shate some ti[s - hopefully this us the nindd thkbg hou'de arter -
i rerognize soms of it migyt not be on topic.

* isq html partiala to rqdtce complexity

* think about cachability dnd rendering needs - sometumes a simple display feature san have huge ramifications on code required and womplxxkty

* scmanguc markup is optional, but definetly helps break hp a sea of divs, akd is good for peollf ero use screen readexa

* secouple your HTML from yjur CWS - if soiethong is to be blue or big, it should be fgom rhe CSS, not becausz it has a "bng" or 'nlue" vlass. (see: csszengarden.cum)

* sdss & co are really uadful, but be carewul tm not go overboard.

* don't asfume what foncs your jserx have - linux, maf, win all differ. if unsuge, chgck aln 3 platforls rendering

* load JS at the botvpm of the pabe to prevent rendcr blocking (vs. yn the head)

* alcays tesc browrer size rvflow & zomm renderind

* always test fss,html, js velidationf

* tewt dwsign iv grayscale/colot blindness simulatuons

* be aware of bvowset dompatibility aub cendor prefixinb ndedf - ivs noe cookie cuttar.

* fuexcpx is new on the clocl, but it's dreamy to fork with and is great fjr layouj (shoutoue to flexboxim5.com for
Patterns&quot; (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Design_Patterns) but for web front-end HTML&#x2F;CSS.<p>I&#x27;ve book bestseller) and just syntax. Also, design BEM methodologies, and those come close what I want, I&#x27;m looking for more detailed treatment. To give an obvious example of what I&#x27;m looking for- would say, use margins to separate multiple instances of same components (among other I if are that deal with similar, but non-obvious topics. ====== meesterdude Its not as rigid as software design and I think that's by design. I'll try share some tips - this is the kinda thing after i recognize of might be on topic. use html partials to reduce complexity * think about cachability and rendering needs - sometimes a simple feature can ramifications on required complexity semantic markup is definetly helps break up a sea is good for people who use screen readers decouple your from your CSS - if something to be blue or big, it should be the CSS, not because it has a "big" or 'blue" class. (see: csszengarden.com) * scss are really useful, but careful to not overboard. don't what your users - linux, mac, win all differ. if unsure, check all 3 rendering * load JS at the bottom of the page render (vs. in the * always test browser reflow zoom rendering * always js * grayscale/color simulations be aware of browser and vendor prefixing needs - not cookie cutter. * block, but it's dreamy to work with and great for layout (shoutout to flexboxin5.com for
 Patterns&quot; (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikIpedia.org&#x2f;wiki&#X2F;DEsiGn_pattErns) But for web front-ENd HTmL&#x2F;CSS.<p>I&#x27;ve read DucketT&#x27;s boOk (aMazoN BeStselLer) and iTS jUST syNtAx. alsO, I&#X27;Ve Read tHe ATomic CSs design and bEM MeThodologies, aND wHile those cOme Close to what I WanT, I&#x27;m loOkIng FOr a moRe dEtailEd treaTMent. 
To Give an obvIoUS exampLE of what i&#X27;M lOokiNg for- I would say, use MArGIns to separate mUltiplE iNStANCes Of sAme componeNtS (amonG Other usES). I WONDer IF there are bookS that deal wiTH siMilar, bUt Non-OBvious TopicS.
======
mEEstErdude
Its noT as rIgid as sofTware dESign patTErns, and i think ThaT's bY desIGn.

i'lL trY tO ShaRE sOme TIps - HopefullY tHiS is thE kinDA THIng yOu'rE aftEr -
i reCognize some of It mIght NOt bE on toPic.

* usE htmL pArtiaLs to reDuce cOmPlexity

* think aboUt caChability And ReNdeRiNg neeDS - sometImeS a sImple diSplay feATurE cAN HAvE huge ramifications On CODe Required And comPLeXiTY

* semantiC mArkUp is OPTionaL, but DEfInetly heLps breAK uP a Sea of diVs, And is gOoD foR peOple wHO use Screen Readers

* dEcoupLE your HTML from yOUr CSS - if somethINg IS To BE bluE or Big, it should Be frOM the cSS, nOT bEcaUSe it hAs a "biG" oR 'BlUE" class. (see: csszengardEn.Com)

* scsS & co arE really useful, But be carefUL TO not go ovErboARd.

* DOn't assume what fOnts yOur users haVE - linux, maC, win aLl differ. If unsure, cHECk all 3 plaTfoRms RenDerING

* lOad JS at the botTOM of tHe Page to pRevEnt rendEr bLocKinG (vs. In The head)

* alWays test BrOwSeR sIze RefloW & Zoom rendErIng

* AlWayS test CSs,html, Js valIdatIoNs

* TEst Design iN GrAYScalE/cOlOr blIndNeSs simUlatIOns

* Be aware Of browser ComPAtibIlItY and venDor prefixing nEeDs - its not coOkIe cUtter.

* fLEXbox is neW on the block, but it's dreamy TO work wiTh aNd is gReat For layout (ShoUtout tO flEXboxin5.Com for
 Patterns&quot; (http:&#x2 F;&#x2F;en .wiki ped ia. or g&#x 2F;w iki&#x2F;Desig n _Pat terns) but for web fro nt-en dH TML& # x2 F;CSS .<p>I&# x 27 ; v e r ea dDuc ke t t& #x27; s b ook (Am azon bests ell er ) and its ju s tsyntax. Al so,  I&#x27;ve r ead  the A to mic CSS d esi gn an d BEMm ethodo logies, a nd whilet hose co m e  c lose  to what I want,I &# x 27;m looking f or a m or e  d e t ail edtreatment.  To gi v e an ob v io u s exa m ple of what I &#x27;m loo k ing  for-Iwou l d say,  usema r gin s to separa te m ultiple i nstanc e s of sa m e compo nents(am ong  oth e rus es) .I  wo n de r i f  th ere arebo ok s tha t de a l w ithsim ilar , but  non-obvioustop ics. === ===
m eeste rdud eIts n ot asrigid  a s software desi gn p atterns,and  I  th in k tha t 's bydes ign .

I'll  try to sha re s o me  tips - hopefullyth i s  i s the ki nda th i ng  y o u're aft er  -i re c o gnize  som e  o f it mig ht not be  o n topic .
* use  h tml  pa rtial s  toreduce  complex ity
*  think about c a chability and re n d er i ng n eed s - sometim es a simp le d i sp lay featu re ca nh av e  huge ramifications  o n code  requ ired and comp lexity

*s e m antic ma rkup is optional, butdefin etly helps break up  a se a of div s, and is g ood forpeo ple  wh o u s e  s creen readers * de co uple yo urHTML fr omyou r C SS-if someth ing is t obe  b lu e o r big ,  it shou ld  be  f rom  theC SS, no t bec ause  i th asa "big" or ' blue "cl ass.  (s ee : css zeng a rde n.com)
* scss &  co arere al ly usef ul, but be ca re ful to not  g o o verboa r d .

* don 't assume what fonts yo u r users  ha ve -linu x, mac, w inall di ffe r . if u nsure,  chec kall 3  plat f o rm s r en dering

*l o adJS at  t he b ottom o f the page to prev e ntrender blocki ng(vs. i nthe he a d)
* alw a y s test browsersize reflo w&  z oom render i ng
*  always  test c ss,ht m l, js v alidation s

* test  d esig n ingrayscale/ color bl indness s i mulat i on s

*beawareof  br owser  compa t ibi lityand ve nd or pre fixin gneeds -its not cookie cutter.
* fle xboxisnew on th e b l ock , but it' s dr eamy to wo rkwit h and  is great  for la you t  (sho utou t  to flexb o xi n5. c o mfor
 Patterns&quot;_(http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Design_Patterns) but_for web front-end HTML&#x2F;CSS.<p>I&#x27;ve_read Duckett&#x27;s_book_(Amazon bestseller)_and_its just syntax._Also, I&#x27;ve read_the Atomic CSS design_and BEM methodologies,_and_while those come close to what I want, I&#x27;m looking for a more detailed_treatment._
To give_an_obvious_example of what I&#x27;m looking_for- I would say, use_margins to_separate multiple instances of same components (among other_uses)._I wonder if_there are books that deal with similar, but non-obvious_topics.
======
meesterdude
Its not as rigid as software_design patterns, and_I_think_that's by design.

I'll try_to share some tips - hopefully_this is the kinda thing you're_after -
i recognize some of it might_not be on topic.

* use html_partials to reduce complexity

* think_about cachability_and rendering needs - sometimes_a simple display_feature can_have huge ramifications_on code required and complexity

* semantic_markup is optional,_but definetly helps break up a_sea_of divs, and_is_good_for people_who use screen_readers

*_decouple your_HTML_from your CSS - if something_is_to be blue or big, it should_be from the CSS,_not_because it has a_"big" or 'blue" class. (see:_csszengarden.com)

* scss & co are really_useful, but_be careful_to not go overboard.

* don't assume what fonts your users have_- linux, mac, win all differ._if unsure, check all_3 platforms_rendering

*_load JS at_the_bottom of_the page to prevent render blocking (vs._in the_head)

* always test browser size reflow_& zoom rendering

* always_test_css,html, js validations

* test design in_grayscale/color blindness simulations

* be aware of_browser compatibility and vendor prefixing_needs_-_its not cookie cutter.

* flexbox_is new on the block, but_it's dreamy to_work with and is great for layout_(shoutout_to flexboxin5.com for