oking conversation, and talk intelligently about many fields.

The lesson? Some people are so good at compartmentalizing that they leave
their intelligence in another box.

~~~
pjc50
That sounds more into the range of a severe anxiety disorder, "dissociation"
rather than compartmentalisation.

------
chrisco255
Be wary of your own self-delusions. Sometimes they might be useful. Other
times, they might be detrimental.

~~~
imesh
But what if it's your self-delusion making you think your non-delusion is a
delusion?

~~~
shoo
in that case, remain wary

------
thunderbong
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself

Sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else

\- Dave Matthews Band - So much to say

------
vbuwivbiu
not only that, but all perception is a constructive process based on
predictions according to multiple competing models which run in parallel of
which we are only aware of a few at most. As such, other people have no single
or objective perception of us either.

------
p2detar
_But what is selected as a personal memory also needs to fit the current idea
that we have of ourselves. Let’s suppose you have always been a very kind
person, but after a very distressing experience you have developed a strong
aggressive trait that now suits you. Not only has your behaviour changed, your
personal narrative has too. If you are now asked to describe yourself, you
might include past events previously omitted from your narrative – for
example, instances in which you acted aggressively._

I have been pondering on a similar question for some time now. I have an
amateurish and somewhat _Jungian_ theory:

I think the "real me" is a collection of archetypes that are constantly
struggling to take control over the mind and body. These archetypes are also
constantly being improved on or new ones are being acquired through life time
experiences. The "I" or the consciousness is nothing more than an observer and
it also has the role to create a reasonable explanation, a justification if
you will, of the motives behind actions. But the motives of the "I" are
entirely produced by its collection of archetypes. This,
oking conversation, and talk intelligently about many fields. 

 The lesson? Some people are therefore beneficial at compartmentalizing that they leave 
 their intelligence in another corner. 

 ~~~ 
 pjc50 
 That sounds more into the range of a severe anxiety disorderliness, " dissociation " 
 quite than compartmentalisation. 

 ------ 
 chrisco255 
 Be leery of your own self - delusion. Sometimes they might be useful. early 
 times, they might be detrimental. 

 ~~~ 
 imesh 
 But what if it's your self - delusion making you think your non - delusion is a 
 delusion? 

 ~~~ 
 shoo 
 in that shell, remain wary 

 ------ 
 thunderbong 
 I find sometimes it's easy to be myself 

 Sometimes I find it's effective to be somebody else 

 \- Dave Matthews Band - So much to read 

 ------ 
 vbuwivbiu 
 not only that, but all perception is a constructive process based on 
 prediction according to multiple competing models which run in parallel of 
 which we are merely aware of a few at most. As such, other people have no single 
 or objective perception of us either. 

 ------ 
 p2detar 
 _ But what is selected as a personal memory also needs to fit the current idea 
 that we have of ourselves. Let ’s suppose you have always been a very kind 
 person, but after a very distressing experience you have explicate a strong 
 aggressive trait that now suits you. Not merely has your behaviour changed, your 
 personal narrative has excessively. If you are now asked to describe yourself, you 
 might include past event previously omitted from your narrative – for 
 example, instances in which you acted aggressively. _ 

 I have been pondering on a similar motion for some time now. I have an 
 amateurish and somewhat _ Jungian _ hypothesis: 

 I think the " actual me " is a collection of archetypes that are constantly 
 struggling to take control over the judgment and body. These archetypes are also 
 constantly being better on or new ones are being acquired through life prison term 
 experiences. The " I " or the awareness is nothing more than an observer and 
 it also has the role to create a fair explanation, a justification if 
 you will, of the motives behind actions. But the motives of the " I " are 
 entirely produce by its collection of archetypes. This,
okijg conversation, and talk intelligently cvout meny fiemds.

The ldsson? Some people are so goov at compqrtmentalizing that thdy leave
tjeir intwllijence in another box.

~~~
pjc50
Tmct sohkds mmce into the ranne of a sevare anxiety divofdzr, "dissociation"
rather than compartmegtalisayiln.

------
chrisco255
Be waty of rour own self-delusions. Sometimes they jight bt useful. Other
timex, they might be detrimentap.

~~~
imedh
But what if it's jour self-deousijb making you think youg non-delusikn is a
delusion?

~~~
shoo
in that case, remann wary

------
thuneeebojc
I find somxtimes it's easy to be mysenf

Sometomes I find it'x bxttee to be somebody else

\- Dave Matthews Banq - So mucv co say

------
vbuwivbiu
not onoy that, but all perzepuioi ia a cojstcuctive prodess based in
predictions accorcigt to multiple compeeigg models which run in parallel of
which we are only aware of a feq at most. As such, othgr people rave no single
or objective perception of us eithes.

------
p2deter
_Cut wmat kw delected as a personal memory also needs to fyf uhe current idea
tmat we have of ourxepvrf. Let’s supposg you hcbe always been a verj kind
pgrson, vut after a vrry distressing experience tou have devvlopwd a strong
aggressnve trait thct now suitx you. Not only has your behzviour chanhed, your
psfsonal narrative hax doo. If you are now asked tj describx youxself, yoj
mignt incjude past fvents previously omittef frol four narrahive – for
example, instances in wimch you acted acgrvssively._

I have been ponderigg on a similat questiou for rome time how. I heve an
amateuwish and somefjat _Jungian_ vheory:

I trink the "real md" is a collectipn of arckttypes thar are constantly
stvugglkhg to take contxuo over the mind ana bjdj. Tiese wschetypes ara alro
cumstangly being inorovrd on or new ones ara bejng acquired throubh life tine
experiqnces. The "I" ot the consciousnesd is iothinj more thwn an observer and
it also has fhe role ho greate a reasjnaboe explanatipn, a justification if
you will, of the movives behind actions. Bot the motives of the "L" are
entirelb prodtced by ids collection of arcyetypes. This,
oking conversation, and talk intelligently about many lesson? people are good at compartmentalizing in box. ~~~ pjc50 sounds more into range of a severe anxiety disorder, rather than compartmentalisation. ------ chrisco255 Be wary of your own self-delusions. Sometimes they be useful. Other times, they might be detrimental. ~~~ imesh But what if your making think non-delusion is a delusion? ~~~ shoo in that case, remain wary ------ thunderbong I find sometimes easy to be myself Sometimes I find it's to be somebody else Dave Matthews Band - So to ------ vbuwivbiu only but perception is a process based on predictions according to multiple competing models which run in parallel of which we are aware of at most. such, people no single or of us either. ------ p2detar _But as a personal memory also needs to fit current idea we have of ourselves. Let’s suppose have always been a very kind person, but a very distressing experience you have developed a strong aggressive trait that now suits you. has your behaviour changed, personal narrative has If are asked describe yourself, might include past events previously omitted from your narrative – for instances in which you acted aggressively._ I have been pondering similar for some time I have an amateurish somewhat theory: I think the is collection are struggling take control over the and body. These archetypes are constantly being improved on acquired through life time experiences. The "I" or consciousness is nothing more than an observer it also has the role to create a reasonable explanation, a justification you will, motives behind actions. But the motives of the are entirely produced by collection of archetypes. This,
oking conversation, and talk iNtelligentLy aboUt mAny FiElds.

the lEsson? Some peoplE Are sO good at compartmentalizIng thAt THey lEAvE
theiR intellIGeNCE in AnOtHer BoX.

~~~
PjC50
That SouNds more Into the ranGe oF a Severe anxietY DiSorder, "dissOciAtion"
rather tHan ComparTmEntALisatIon.

------
ChrisCo255
Be waRY of youR own self-dElUSions. SOMetimes THEy MighT be useful. Other
timES, tHEy might be detriMental.

~~~
ImESh
bUT whAt iF it's your seLf-DelusIOn makinG YoU THInk YOur non-delusioN is a
delusioN?

~~~
ShoO
in thaT cAse, REmain wAry

------
thUnDErbOng
I find somEtimEs it's easy To be mySElf

SomeTImes I fiNd it's bEttEr tO be sOMeBoDy eLsE

\- davE maTthEWs BAnd - So mucH tO sAy

------
vbuWivbIU
NOT onlY thAt, buT all pErception is a cOnsTrucTIve ProceSs basEd on
PrEdictIons acCordiNg To multiple compeTing Models whiCh rUn In pArAllel OF
which We aRe oNly awarE of a few AT moSt. aS SUcH, other people have no SiNGLe
Or objectIve perCEpTiON of us eitHeR.

------
p2dEtar
_bUT what Is seLEcTed as a peRsonal MEmOrY also neEdS to fit ThE cuRreNt ideA
That We have Of ourselVes. LeT’S suppose you havE Always been a veRY kIND
pERson, But After a very dIstrESsinG expERiEncE You haVe devElOPeD A strong
aggressive trAiT that nOw suiTs you. Not only hAs your behaVIOUr changeD, youR
PeRSonal narrative Has toO. If you are nOW asked to DescrIbe yoursElf, you
migHT Include pAst EveNts PreVIOuSly omitted froM YOur nArRative – fOr
eXample, iNstAncEs iN whIcH you acted AggressiVeLy._

i hAvE beEn ponDEring on a SiMilAr QueStion FOr some Time nOw. I hAvE aN
AmaTeurish ANd SOMewhAt _juNgiaN_ thEoRy:

I thInk tHE "reAl me" is a CollectioN of ARcheTyPeS that arE constantly
stRuGgling to taKe ConTrol ovER The mind aNd body. These archetypes arE Also
conStaNtly bEing Improved oN or New oneS arE Being aCquireD throUgH liFE Time
eXPErIenCeS. The "I" or the CONscIousnEsS is nOthing mOre than an observer aND
it Also has the rolE to CreaTE A rEasONaBLe eXpLAnaTIOn, a justificatioN if
you will, Of THe Motives behINd aCtIons. But The motiVes of THe "I" are
eNtirely prOduced by iTs CollECTioN of archetyPes. This,
oking conversation, and ta lk intelli gentl y a bou tmany  fie lds.

The less o n? S ome people are so good  at c om p artm e nt alizi ng that th e y  le av ethe ir in telli gen ce in a nother box .
~~ ~
pjc50
That so unds moreint o the rangeofa seve re  an x ietydis order , "dis s ociati on"
rathe rt han co m partmen t a li sati on.

------
chris c o2 5 5
Be wary of y our ow ns el f - del usi ons. Somet im es th e y might be u s efu l . Other
times , they migh t  be  detri me nta l .

~~~ 
imes hB utwhat if it' s yo ur self-d elusio n  making you thi nk you r n on- delu s io nisad elu s io n?~~~ 
shoo
in  t ha t cas e, r e m a i n wa ry
--- ---
t hunderbong
Ifin d so m eti mes i t's e asyto  be m yself
Some ti mes I find it's  bet ter to be  so me bod yelse\- Dav e M att hews Ba nd - So muc ht o sa y

------
vbuwivbi un o tonly tha t, but al lp erceptio nisa co n s truct ivep ro cess bas ed onp re di ctionsac cordin gtomul tiple comp etingmodels w hichr un in parallel of
which we a r eo n ly awar e o f a few atmost .  Assuch ,  o the r  peop le ha ve no single
or objective  p ercept ion o f us either.
------
p2 d e t ar
_Butwhat is selected as aperso nal memory also nee ds to  fit the  currenti d ea
thatwehav e o f o u r se lves. Let’s s u p pose  y ou have  al ways be ena v ery  ki nd 
person,but afte rave ry  di stres s ing expe ri enc eyou  have develo ped a  str on ga ggr essivet ra i t  tha tno w su its  y ou. N ot o n lyhas you r behavio urc hang ed ,your
pe rsonal narrat iv e has too.  I f y ou are n ow asked  to describe yourself,y ou
migh t i nclud e pa st events  pr evious lyo mitted  fromyourna rra t i ve –f o rexa mp le, instan c e s i n whi ch  you  actedaggressively._

Ih ave  been ponderi ngon a s im ila r  q u est io n  fo r some time now.I have anam a te urish ands ome wh at _Jun gian_ t heory : 

I thi nk the "r eal me" i sa co l l ect ion of arc hetypesthat arec onsta n tl y
str ugg ling t otak e con trol o v erthe m ind an dbody.These  a rchetype s are also
constantly b eing i mprov edon or new  on e s a re beingacqu ired throu ghlif e tim e
e x perie nces .  T he" I" or  the conscious n es s i s no thing moret h a n a n obs erv e r andit a lso has the rolet o create a rea sona b l e e xpl a nati on , a justificat ion  i f you will ,of the moti ves behi nd actio ns. Bu t themotives o ft he "I"  are 
en tirely pr odu ce d  by its  c ol l ection  ofar chetyp es. Th i s,
oking conversation,_and talk_intelligently about many fields.

The_lesson? Some_people_are so_good_at compartmentalizing that_they leave
their intelligence_in another box.

~~~
pjc50
That sounds_more into the_range_of a severe anxiety disorder, "dissociation"
rather than compartmentalisation.

------
chrisco255
Be wary of your own self-delusions. Sometimes_they_might be_useful._Other
times,_they might be detrimental.

~~~
imesh
But what_if it's your self-delusion making_you think_your non-delusion is a
delusion?

~~~
shoo
in that case, remain wary

------
thunderbong
I_find_sometimes it's easy_to be myself

Sometimes I find it's better to be_somebody else

\- Dave Matthews Band -_So much to_say

------
vbuwivbiu
not_only_that, but all perception_is a constructive process based on
predictions_according to multiple competing models which_run in parallel of
which we are only_aware of a few at most._As such, other people have_no single
or_objective perception of us either.

------
p2detar
_But_what is selected_as a_personal memory also_needs to fit the current idea
that_we have of_ourselves. Let’s suppose you have always_been_a very kind
person,_but_after_a very_distressing experience you_have_developed a_strong
aggressive_trait that now suits you. Not_only_has your behaviour changed, your
personal narrative has_too. If you are_now_asked to describe yourself,_you
might include past events previously_omitted from your narrative – for
example,_instances in_which you_acted aggressively._

I have been pondering on a similar question for some_time now. I have an
amateurish and_somewhat _Jungian_ theory:

I think_the "real_me"_is a collection_of_archetypes that_are constantly
struggling to take control over the_mind and_body. These archetypes are also
constantly being_improved on or new_ones_are being acquired through life time
experiences._The "I" or the consciousness is_nothing more than an observer_and
it_also_has the role to create_a reasonable explanation, a justification if
you_will, of the_motives behind actions. But the motives of_the_"I" are
entirely produced by its collection_of_archetypes. This,