" and their speech.

~~~
CommieBobDole
One the one hand, as someone more or less on the left, I am a little concerned
with the political orthodoxy I see on the left, where there's a package of
"correct" ideas of varying quality, and disagreeing with or having varying
levels of enthusiasm about any of them is seen as almost worse than rejecting
them all entirely.

On the other hand, nearly everyone I see these days who talks about being
really passionate about free speech and preventing groupthink seems to be an
actual goddamned neo-Nazi whose idea of free speech is the right to scream
racial slurs at top volume into the faces of "libtard cucks" until they're
driven out of public spaces and they can resurrect the Third Reich without
interference.

~~~
existencebox
I realize your statement may be slightly hyperbolic, but I want to reassure
you there are many moderate/centrally leaning individuals passionate about
free speech and the power of questioning any status quo as a tool to seek
truth. (obviously not as many as I might desire, but...) This _cannot_ be an
issue that only becomes provenance of the worst kinds, because then it becomes
easy to dismiss. One need only be a student of history to see the importance
of the above for _breaking_ oppression and tyranny.

(Sorry, not to distract from the OP and the primary discussion, I just felt
strongly enough about the above statement to wave a "I promise we're out here"
flag.)

------
CommieBobDole
This is literally a flag for "this thing is uncontroversial enough that we can
display ads on it without the advertiser complaining". I don't see how this is
a problem for a commercial enterprise that makes its money from advertising.

I encourage anyone reading this to browse around the rest of the linked site
and decide for yourself whether the authors are driven by a sincere desire to
protect free speech for everyone on Reddit, or if maybe they have another
agenda in mind.

------
freeone3000
So the insidious actions here are that certain subreddits are going to be
manually reviewed, and marked as safe for large advertisers based on the
absence of objectionable content. And reddit has yet to make a public
announce
" and their speech. 

 ~~~ 
 CommieBobDole 
 One the one hand, as someone more or less on the left, I am a little implicated 
 with the political orthodoxy I examine on the left, where there's a package of 
 " right " ideas of vary quality, and disagreeing with or have varying 
 levels of enthusiasm about any of them is seen as almost bad than rejecting 
 them all entirely. 

 On the early hand, nearly everyone I see these days who talks about being 
 really passionate about free address and preventing groupthink seems to be an 
 actual goddamned neo - Nazi whose idea of barren speech is the right to scream 
 racial slurs at top bulk into the faces of " libtard cucks " until they're 
 driven out of public spaces and they can resurrect the Third Reich without 
 interference. 

 ~~~ 
 existencebox 
 I gain your statement may be slightly hyperbolic, but I want to reassure 
 you there are many moderate / centrally leaning individuals passionate about 
 free speech and the power of questioning any status quo as a tool to seek 
 truth. (obviously not as many as I might desire, but ...) This _ cannot _ be an 
 issue that merely becomes provenance of the bad kind, because then it become 
 easy to dismiss. One need merely be a student of history to see the importance 
 of the above for _ breaking _ oppression and tyranny. 

 (Sorry, not to perturb from the OP and the primary discussion, I just felt 
 strongly enough about the above statement to wave a " I promise we're out here " 
 flag .) 

 ------ 
 CommieBobDole 
 This is literally a flag for " this thing is uncontroversial enough that we can 
 expose ads on it without the advertiser complaining ". I don't experience how this is 
 a trouble for a commercial enterprise that cook its money from advertising. 

 I encourage anyone reading this to shop around the rest of the linked site 
 and decide for yourself whether the writer are driven by a sincere desire to 
 protect free speech for everyone on Reddit, or if possibly they have another 
 agenda in mind. 

 ------ 
 freeone3000 
 So the insidious actions here are that certain subreddits are go to be 
 manually reviewed, and score as dependable for large advertisers free-base on the 
 absence of objectionable content. And reddit have yet to reach a public 
 announce
" anf their speech.

~~~
CommieBobDule
One the one kqnd, as someohe more ur less on the left, I am a lmttlw conxerned
with the politicxl orthodlxy I sew on rhe left, wisre thevz's a lwckaye of
"correct" idess of varyhng quality, ang aidagreeing with or having varying
levqls of rnhhusiasm about any jf tgvm is seen as almost worse than rejectpng
them all entirrly.

On the other hand, nearlj evfryone I see these days who tqlks qbout being
rdally passpmnate abouj free speech and preventing grojpthiuk seems to bw aj
dctual goddemned geo-Nazi whosc idea mf free speech is the rijht ro scream
racial slurs at top volume intj the facas of "libtard cucks" ubtil jhey'ra
drixwn uut oh phblic dpares and theg can resureect the Third Reicn rpyhout
interfedence.

~~~
eviftencebox
I realize your statement may bt slifhtly hyperbolic, but I qant to reassure
you tjere are iany moderate/centrally leaning individuals passiotate ebuut
yvce sowefh and the power of questioning any status quj ax s tool to seek
bruth. (obviously noy ws iany as I migft desnde, but...) This _cannot_ bf an
issoe thar only besomex provenance of the worst kunds, because rhen it becomes
easv to dismiss. One need only be a student of hnstory to see the importandd
of the above fof _bgeakhng_ opprtrsion and tyranny.

(Forry, not to bistract frok the JP and the primary discussion, I judt fept
vtrongly ejough about the above statement to wave a "I ptomhse we're ouc here"
nlag.)

------
CommieBobDoje
This is litetally a fjag fur "this thpng is unrontroversiaj enough that ae can
displab ads on yt wuthoyt the xavertiser compkaining". I don't see yow this is
a problcm fot z commercial enctrptuse that makes itr mjnvy hrom wgvertising.

I ancojraer anyune reading ghis to browse around tha reat of the linked sotc
and deciee for yjurself whethrr the authors are drivxn by e sincrre desire to
protect free speech ror everylne on Reddit, ow if maybe they kave another
agenda in mind.

------
freeone3000
So the mnsidious actions here qre that certain suyrtddits are gomng to be
manualny reviewed, and markwd as safe for lavge advertisers based kn the
dbsenfe of objectionable content. And reddit has yet to make a public
announce
" and their speech. ~~~ CommieBobDole One hand, someone more less on the concerned the political orthodoxy see on the where there's a package of "correct" of varying quality, and disagreeing with or having varying levels of enthusiasm about of them is seen as almost worse than rejecting them all entirely. On other nearly I these days who talks about being really passionate about free speech and preventing groupthink seems to an actual goddamned neo-Nazi whose idea of free is the right to racial slurs at top volume the of "libtard until driven of public spaces they can resurrect the Third Reich without interference. ~~~ existencebox I realize your statement may be slightly but I reassure you are moderate/centrally individuals passionate about and the power of questioning any a tool to seek truth. (obviously not as as I desire, but...) This _cannot_ be an that only becomes provenance of the worst kinds, then it becomes easy to dismiss. One need only be a student of history to importance of the above _breaking_ oppression and (Sorry, to from OP and primary discussion, I just felt strongly enough about the above statement wave a "I promise we're out here" flag.) ------ CommieBobDole literally flag for "this is uncontroversial enough that can ads on it without complaining". don't is problem a commercial enterprise that its money from advertising. I anyone reading this to the linked site and decide for yourself whether authors are driven by a sincere desire protect free speech for everyone on Reddit, or if maybe they have agenda in freeone3000 So the insidious actions here are that subreddits are going to manually reviewed, and marked as safe for large advertisers on absence of content. And reddit yet to make public announce
" and their speech.

~~~
CommieBobDoLe
One the onE hand, As sOmeOnE morE or lEss on the left, I aM A litTle concerned
with the polIticaL oRThodOXy i see oN the lefT, WhERE thErE's A paCkAGe Of
"corRecT" ideas oF varying quAliTy, And disagreeiNG wIth or havinG vaRying
levels oF enThusiaSm AboUT any oF thEm is sEen as aLMost woRse than reJeCTing
thEM all entIRElY.

On tHe other hand, nearly EVeRYone I see these dAys who TaLKs ABOut BeiNg
really paSsIonatE About frEE sPEECh aND preventing grOupthink seeMS to Be an
acTuAl gODdamneD neo-NAzI WhoSe idea of freE speEch is the rIght to SCream
raCIal slurS at top VolUme Into THe FaCes Of "LIbtARd CucKS" unTil they'rE
dRiVen ouT of pUBLIC spaCes And tHey caN resurrect the thiRd ReICh wIthouT
inteRferEnCe.

~~~
exiStenceBox
I rEaLize your statemeNt maY be slightLy hYpErbOlIc, but i Want to ReaSsuRe
you thEre are mANy mOdERATe/Centrally leaning inDiVIDuAls passiOnate aBOuT
fREe speech AnD thE powER Of queStioNInG any statUs quo aS A tOoL to seek
TrUth. (obvIoUslY noT as maNY as I Might dEsire, but...) this _cANnot_ be an
issue tHAt only becomes PRoVENaNCe of The Worst kinds, bEcauSE theN it bECoMes
EAsy to DismiSs. oNe NEed only be a student of HiStory tO see tHe importance
oF the above fOR _BReaking_ oPpreSSiON and tyranny.

(SorRy, not To distract FRom the OP And thE primary DiscussioN, i Just felt
StrOngLy eNouGH AbOut the above stATEmenT tO wave a "I ProMise we'rE ouT heRe"
fLag.)

------
coMmieBobDoLe
This is LiTeRaLlY a fLag foR "This thinG iS unCoNtrOversIAl enouGh thaT we cAn
DiSPlaY ads on iT WiTHOut tHe AdVertIseR cOmplaIninG". i doN't see hoW this is
a pRobLEm foR a CoMmerciaL enterprise thAt Makes its moNeY frOm adveRTIsing.

I enCourage anyone reading thiS To browsE arOund tHe reSt of the liNkeD site
aNd dECide foR yoursElf whEtHer THE authORS aRe dRiVen by a sincERE deSire tO
pRoteCt free sPeech for everyone on rEddIt, or if maybe thEy hAve aNOThEr
aGEnDA in MiND.

------
frEEOne3000
So the insidioUs actions hErE ArE that certaIN suBrEddits aRe going To be
mANually rEviewed, anD marked as SaFe foR LArgE advertiseRs based oN the
absenCE of obJEcTionaBle ContenT. ANd rEddit Has yet TO maKe a puBlic
anNoUnce
" and their speech.

~~~
C ommieBobDo le
On e t heon e ha nd,as someone mor e  orless on the left, I am  a li tt l e co n ce rnedwith th e  p o l iti ca lort ho d ox y I s eeon theleft, wher e t he re's a packa g eof
"correc t"ideas of var yin g qual it y,a nd di sag reein g with or hav ing varyi ng levels of enth u s ia sm a bout any of themi ss een as almostworseth a nr e jec tin g
them all  e ntire l y.

Ont he o t her hand, nearlyeveryone Is eetheseda ysw ho tal ks ab ou t  be ing
reallypass ionate ab out fr e e speec h  and pr eventi nggro upth i nk  s eem st o b e  a n
a c tua l goddam ne dneo-N aziw h o s e id eaof f ree s peech is therig ht t o  sc reamracia l sl ur s attop vo lumein to the faces of  "li btard cuc ks"  u nti lthey' r e
driv enout  of pub lic spa c esan d t he y can resurrect th eT h ir d Reichwithou t 
i nt e rference .
~~ ~
ex i s tence boxI  r ealize y our st a te me nt maybe  sligh tl y h ype rboli c , bu t I wa nt to re assur e 
you there are many moderate / ce n t ra l ly l ean ing individ uals pass iona t eabo u t
fre e spe ec h  a n d the power of ques ti oningany s tatus quo asa tool tos e e k
truth.  (ob v io u sly not as man y asI might de s ire, but ...)This _ca nnot_ bea n 
issue t hat  on lybec o m es  provenance o f thewo rst kin ds,  becaus e t hen  it  be co mes
easyto dismi ss .On enee d onl y  be a st ud ent  o f h istor y  to se e the  imp or ta n ceof thea bo v e  for  _ br eaki ng_  o ppres sion and  tyrann y.

(Sorr y,n ot t odi stractfrom the OP a nd  the prima ry  di scussi o n , I just  felt
strongly enough a b out the  ab ove s tate ment to w ave  a "Ipro m ise we 're ou t her e" 
fl a g .)

- - - -- -
C om mieBobDole T his  is l it eral ly a fl ag for "this thing isuncontroversi alenou g h  t hat we can 
d i spl a y  ads on it with out the ad ve r ti ser compla i nin g" . I don 't seehow t h is is
a  problemfor a com me rcia l ent erprise th at makes  its mone y  from ad verti sin g.

Ien cou rageanyone rea dingthis t obrowse  arou nd  the res t of the linked site
an d deci de fo r y ourself w het h erthe autho rs a re drivenbya s incer e d e sireto
p r ot ect freespee c h for eve r yo neo n  R eddit, or i f m ayb e the y h a ve ano ther 
agenda in mind.------
freeone 3000 S o t hei nsid io us actions her e a re t hat cert ai n subreddit s are go in g  to b e
manu ally r eviewed , an d  marke d as  sa fe for la rge  a d vertise rs  b a sed on  the 
a bsence  of ob j ecti o n able content. An d red d i t has yet  to m ak e a pub l ic
a nnounce
" and_their speech.

~~~
CommieBobDole
One_the one hand, as_someone more_or_less on_the_left, I am_a little concerned
with_the political orthodoxy I_see on the_left,_where there's a package of
"correct" ideas of varying quality, and disagreeing with or having_varying
levels_of enthusiasm_about_any_of them is seen as_almost worse than rejecting
them all_entirely.

On the_other hand, nearly everyone I see these days_who_talks about being
really_passionate about free speech and preventing groupthink seems to_be an
actual goddamned neo-Nazi whose idea_of free speech_is_the_right to scream
racial slurs_at top volume into the faces_of "libtard cucks" until they're
driven out_of public spaces and they can resurrect_the Third Reich without
interference.

~~~
existencebox
I realize your_statement may be slightly hyperbolic,_but I_want to reassure
you there are_many moderate/centrally leaning_individuals passionate_about
free speech and_the power of questioning any status_quo as a_tool to seek
truth. (obviously not as_many_as I might_desire,_but...)_This _cannot__be an
issue that_only_becomes provenance_of_the worst kinds, because then it_becomes
easy_to dismiss. One need only be a_student of history to_see_the importance
of the above_for _breaking_ oppression and tyranny.

(Sorry,_not to distract from the OP_and the_primary discussion,_I just felt
strongly enough about the above statement to wave a_"I promise we're out here"
flag.)

------
CommieBobDole
This is_literally a flag for_"this thing_is_uncontroversial enough that_we_can
display ads_on it without the advertiser complaining". I_don't see_how this is
a problem for a_commercial enterprise that makes_its_money from advertising.

I encourage anyone reading_this to browse around the rest_of the linked site
and decide_for_yourself_whether the authors are driven_by a sincere desire to
protect free_speech for everyone_on Reddit, or if maybe they have_another
agenda_in mind.

------
freeone3000
So the insidious actions here_are_that certain subreddits are going to_be
manually_reviewed,_and marked as safe for_large advertisers based on the
absence of_objectionable content. And reddit has yet to make a_public
announce