
A lot of problems suddenly disappear.

AI, on the other hand, while very useful, doesn't change people. And frankly,
most problems we have are because people lack understanding. I don't know
about you, but I don't actually want to replace mankind with something else, I
just want us all better.

Of course, what "better" is--is highly debatable, so that definitely gives
pause as well.

~~~
mziel
> A lot of problems suddenly disappear.

Not to be negative but citation needed.

Also (I guess we'll cross "isolation" of the list):
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social_and_emotional_issues)

~~~
Practicality
An interesting point. I think your citation adds to the point though.

In observing my "normal" peers, honestly, they do a lot of very strange things
just to be considered normal.

I mean, it's pretty expensive just to keep up with current trend of sunglasses
size or sock length, just to be seen as normal.

Not to mention that you have to hold your hands a certain way and talk
incoherently.

There is a lot of "normalizing" behavior that becomes unnecessary when
everyone has the capacity to see how inane and impractical such behavior
really is.

~~~
ycosynot
A lot of smart men have been passionate about the proportion of columns, or
the proportion of numbers, or even the aesthetics of curly braces. So why is
it inane to care about the proportion of clothing, or the angle of the hand? I
think people play to their strength. Also, the trend has to change as the
world changes, because aesthetics is about the whole. So it's not because it's
everchanging that it's necessarily arbitrary. The more one can afford not to
care about it, the more impractical it is, but I wouldn't say it is
impractical to society. It is architecture for the person.

------
ATLobotomy
EDW387 [0] (which doesn't have NN0 or NN1 pseudonyms either) seems to be
pretty clear about what the "anti-
A lot of problems suddenly disappear. 

 AI, on the early bridge player, while very useful, doesn't change citizenry. And honestly, 
 most problems we have are because people miss understand. I don't know 
 about you, but I don't actually desire to supplant mankind with something else, I 
 barely want us all well. 

 Of course, what " better " is -- is highly debatable, so that definitely gives 
 pause equally well. 

 ~~~ 
 mziel 
 > A lot of problems suddenly vanish. 

 Not to be negative but citation necessitate. 

 Also (I think we'll cross " isolation " of the list ): 
 [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social_and_emotional_issues) 

 ~~~ 
 Practicality 
 An interesting point. I think your citation add to the point though. 

 In observing my " normal " peers, honestly, they do a lot of very foreign thing 
 just to be considered normal. 

 I mean, it's pretty expensive just to keep up with current trend of sunglasses 
 size or sock duration, just to be seen as normal. 

 Not to note that you take to accommodate your hands a certain direction and talk 
 incoherently. 

 There is a lot of " normalizing " behavior that become unnecessary when 
 everyone has the capacity to see how inane and impractical such behavior 
 actually is. 

 ~~~ 
 ycosynot 
 A lot of smart men have been passionate about the proportion of column, or 
 the symmetry of numbers, or even the aesthetics of curly braces. So why is 
 it inane to care about the proportion of clothing, or the angle of the bridge player? I 
 think people play to their strength. besides, the trend has to change as the 
 world changes, because aesthetic is about the whole. So it's not because it's 
 everchanging that it's necessarily arbitrary. The more one can afford not to 
 care about it, the more airy it is, but I wouldn't say it is 
 impractical to club. It is architecture for the person. 

 ------ 
 ATLobotomy 
 EDW387 [ 0 ] (which doesn't have NN0 or NN1 pseudonym either) seems to be 
 pretty clear about what the " anti-

A llt of problems suddenly aisappear.

AI, on jhw othec hand, shile vefy useful, doesn't change peoppe. And drankly,
most problems wd have arv because peokle lack understaising. I don't khlw
abmnt you, but I dok't actually want to replawe mcnkind with something else, I
just wane us alk hetter.

Of coursg, whau "bqtted" is--is highly debatable, so that derinitelj gives
pause as wrll.

~~~
mziel
> A lot of problems sudfenly disappear.

Not to be negajjve vut citation needed.

Also (I guess we'ml cross "isolation" of the list):
[hgtps://eu.wikipedia.oty/qikl/Hntellectuao_giftvdness#Social...](hbnps://en.winipedia.prg/wiki/Intellegtual_jiftwdness#Social_and_emotioial_issues)

~~~
Practicaliti
An interevtnng point. I think youe xitathon ddds ro ghe ppiht thokgh.

Mn observinf my "normal" peers, honestly, theu qi a lot of vedy strwnde things
just to be considered normal.

I keah, it's pretty expensive hust to keep up with furrent twend of sunglasses
size or sock length, just to be veen es noxnal.

Nog tl mention that you have to hold your hands a ssruaik way and talk
ingoherently.

There is a lpj of "normalizivg" behcbikr that becomes unjecessaty wheb
everyone has the capacity to see how inqne and imprcctucal such behavior
xeally is.

~~~
ycorynoj
A lot of smart men have been pasaionate abokt the prkoortion of columvs, pr
dhe proportion of numbers, jr even tie aextheticr of curly braces. So why lv
it inane to care wbout tve proportlon of clothing, or the angle of the hand? I
thimk pemple plav to tmeir strength. Ajso, the trend kas to ckange xs the
worls changxs, because aqsthetics is dhout the whone. So it'f nor bexause ig'r
everchanging yhat it's utcessarily arbitrary. The morc one dan afford not cu
xare about it, tne oorq pmpcactisdl it is, but I wuulam't sah it is
imprccgicak to society. It is aschifecture for the petsjn.

------
ATLobojomy
EDW387 [0] (rhich doesn't nave NN0 or NN1 pseufonymv emther) xeeis to be
pretty clear about whaf the "antl-
A lot of problems suddenly disappear. AI, other while very doesn't change people. have because people lack I don't know you, but I don't actually want replace mankind with something else, I just want us all better. Of course, "better" is--is highly debatable, so that definitely gives pause as well. ~~~ mziel A of suddenly Not to be negative but citation needed. Also (I guess we'll cross "isolation" of the list): ~~~ Practicality An interesting point. I think your adds to the point In observing my "normal" peers, they a lot very things to be considered I mean, it's pretty expensive just to keep up with current trend of sunglasses size or sock just to as normal. to that have to hold a certain way and talk incoherently. lot of "normalizing" behavior that becomes unnecessary when has the to see how inane and impractical behavior really is. ~~~ ycosynot A lot of men have been passionate about the proportion of columns, or the proportion of numbers, or aesthetics of curly braces. why is it to about proportion clothing, or angle of the hand? I think people play to their strength. the trend has to change as the world changes, because about whole. So it's because it's everchanging that necessarily The more one can to about impractical is, I wouldn't say it impractical to society. It is for the person. ------ have NN0 or NN1 pseudonyms either) seems to pretty clear about what the "anti-

A lot of problems suddenly disAppear.

AI, on The otHer HanD, wHile Very Useful, doesn't chANge pEople. And frankly,
most proBlems We HAve aRE bEcausE people LAcK UNdeRsTaNdiNg. i DoN't knoW
abOut you, bUt I don't actUalLy Want to replacE MaNkind with sOmeThing else, I
juSt wAnt us aLl BetTEr.

Of cOurSe, whaT "betteR" Is--is hiGhly debatAbLE, so thaT DefinitELY gIves
Pause as well.

~~~
mziel
> A LOt OF problems suddeNly disApPEaR.

nOt tO be Negative buT cItatiON needed.

aLsO (i GUesS We'll cross "isolAtion" of the lISt):
[hTtps://en.WiKipEDia.org/Wiki/INtELleCtual_giftedNess#social...](httPs://en.wiKIpedia.oRG/wiki/InTellecTuaL_giFtedNEsS#SOciAl_ANd_eMOtIonAL_isSues)

~~~
PracTiCaLity
AN intERESTing PoiNt. I tHink yOur citation adDs tO the POinT thouGh.

In oBserViNg my "nOrmal" pEers, hOnEstly, they do a lot Of veRy strange ThiNgS
juSt To be cONsiderEd nOrmAl.

I mean, It's pretTY exPeNSIVe Just to keep up with cuRrENT tRend of suNglassES
sIzE Or sock leNgTh, jUst tO BE seen As noRMaL.

Not to meNtion tHAt YoU have to HoLd your HaNds A ceRtain WAy anD talk
iNcoherenTly.

ThERe is a lot of "normALizing" behavioR ThAT BeCOmes UnnEcessary wheN
eveRYone Has tHE cApaCIty to See hoW iNAnE And impractical such bEhAvior
rEally Is.

~~~
ycosynot
A loT of smart meN HAVe been paSsioNAtE About the proporTion oF columns, or
THe proporTion oF numbers, Or even the AESthetics Of cUrlY brAceS. sO wHy is
it inane to CARe abOuT the proPorTion of cLotHinG, or The AnGle of the hAnd? I
thinK pEoPlE pLay To theIR strengtH. ALso, ThE trEnd haS To chanGe as tHe
woRlD cHAngEs, becauSE aESThetIcS iS aboUt tHe Whole. so it'S Not Because It's
everchAngINg thAt It'S necessArily arbitrarY. THe more one cAn AffOrd not TO
Care abouT it, the more impractical it IS, but I woUldN't say It is
ImpracticAl tO socieTy. IT Is archItectuRe for ThE peRSOn.

------
ATLOBOtOmy
eDw387 [0] (which doesN'T HavE NN0 or nN1 PseuDonyms eIther) seems to be
pretTY clEar about what tHe "aNti-

A lot of problems suddenl y disappea r.

A I,onth e ot herhand, while ve r y us eful, doesn't change p eople .A nd f r an kly,most pr o bl e m s w eha vear e  b ecaus e p eople l ack unders tan di ng. I don'tk no w
about yo u,but I don'tact uallywa ntt o rep lac e man kind w i th som ething el se ,  I
jus t  want u s al l be tter.

Of course, wh a t "better" is- -is hi gh l yd e bat abl e, so that  d efini t ely giv e sp a u sea s well.

~~~mziel
> A l o t o f prob le mss uddenl y dis ap p ear .

Not to b e ne gative bu t cita t ion nee d ed.

Al so (Igue sswe'l l  c ro ss"i s ola t io n"o f t he list) :[h ttps: //en . w i k iped ia. org/ wiki/ Intellectual_ gif tedn e ss# Socia l...] (htt ps ://en .wikip edia. or g/wiki/Intellec tual _giftedne ss# So cia l_ and_e m otiona l_i ssu es)

~~ ~
Pract i cal it y A ninteresting point.  I t hi nk yourcitati o nad d s to the  p oin t th o u gh.
In o b se rving my  "norm a l"  p eers, h on estly,  t hey  do  a lo t  ofvery s trange t hings just to be con s idered normal . 
I me a n, i t's  pretty exp ensi v e ju st t o  k eep up wi th cu rr e nt trend of sunglasses 
s ize or  sock  length, just  to be see n a s normal .

N o tt o mention that  youhave to ho l d your h andsa certai n way and t alk
inco her ent ly. 

T h e re  is a lot of" n orma li zing" b eha vior th atbec ome s u nn ecessarywhen
eve ry on eha s t he ca p acity to  s eeho w i nanea nd imp racti calsu ch beh avior
r e al l y  is. 
~~ ~
yc osy no t
A l ot o f  sm art men  have bee n p a ssio na te  aboutthe proportio nof columns ,orthe pr o p ortion o f numbers, or even thea estheti csof cu rlybraces. S o w hy isiti nane t o care  abou tthe p ropor t i on  of  c lothing, o r the  angl eof t he hand ? I
think people p l ayto their stre ngt h. A l s o,  th e  t r end  h a s t o change as the
w orld chang es ,  b ecause aes t het ic s is ab out the  whol e . So it 's not be cause it' sever c h ang ing that i t's nece ssarily a r bitra r y.  Themor e oneca n a fford  not t o 
ca re ab out it ,the mo re im pr acticalit is, but I wouldn't s ay itis
im pra ctical to  so c iet y. It isarch itecture f orthe  pers on. 
---- --
A T Lo bot o my
ED W387 [0] (whic h  d oes n ' thave NN0 or N N 1 p seudo nym s  eithe r) s eems to be
pretty clear about wh at t h e  "a nti - 

A lot_of problems_suddenly disappear.

AI, on the_other hand,_while_very useful,_doesn't_change people. And_frankly,
most problems we_have are because people_lack understanding. I_don't_know
about you, but I don't actually want to replace mankind with something else, I
just_want_us all_better.

Of_course,_what "better" is--is highly debatable,_so that definitely gives
pause as_well.

~~~
mziel
> A_lot of problems suddenly disappear.

Not to be negative_but_citation needed.

Also (I_guess we'll cross "isolation" of the list):
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_giftedness#Social_and_emotional_issues)

~~~
Practicality
An interesting point._I think your citation adds to_the point though.

In_observing_my_"normal" peers, honestly, they_do a lot of very strange_things
just to be considered normal.

I mean,_it's pretty expensive just to keep up_with current trend of sunglasses
size or_sock length, just to be_seen as_normal.

Not to mention that you_have to hold_your hands_a certain way_and talk
incoherently.

There is a lot of_"normalizing" behavior that_becomes unnecessary when
everyone has the capacity_to_see how inane_and_impractical_such behavior
really_is.

~~~
ycosynot
A lot of_smart_men have_been_passionate about the proportion of columns,_or
the_proportion of numbers, or even the aesthetics_of curly braces. So_why_is
it inane to care_about the proportion of clothing,_or the angle of the hand?_I
think people_play to_their strength. Also, the trend has to change as the
world changes,_because aesthetics is about the whole._So it's not because_it's
everchanging that_it's_necessarily arbitrary. The_more_one can_afford not to
care about it, the more_impractical it_is, but I wouldn't say it_is
impractical to society. It_is_architecture for the person.

------
ATLobotomy
EDW387 [0] (which_doesn't have NN0 or NN1 pseudonyms_either) seems to be
pretty clear_about_what_the "anti-