these are " basics" things but many people lack them.For me,
just having one of them, it's a privilege. I finally got my hair back and my
skin rashes are more manageable, so now I am ready to meet new people and be
more presentable.Better keep up now because I feel my time is limited due to
my health condition. Who knows when I will lose my hair again and all that? I
better be positive about my situation and don't stress myself more about my
struggles.

Just believe in yourself, don't forget what you want and your needs, keep
fighting and don't give up. Don't dwell in painful situations and don't allow
yourself to cry for more that a day. Don't look back, just look forward but
don't forget the reasons you are fighting for this. Don't really wait for a
break, just go after what you want...

Hopefully, your situation turns around. Keep us updated...

 
House Keys copyable from 200 ft away via camera - nl
http://www.jacobsschool.ucsd.edu/news/news_releases/release.sfe?id=791
======
slapshot
This is perhaps an unintentional demonstration that "insecure against absurdly
complex and specific attacks" does not always mean "insecure."

For a web system that is under attack 24/7 from 255^4 different attack
vectors, you need "secure against even absurdly complex attacks" to be
"secure."

But for my house? Your average thief isn't going to spend the time to take a
high-res photo of my keys. Instead, they're just going to beat me until I give
them my keys (the original "rubber-hose crytography") or just take a crowbar
to the door. It's just not worth it to use such a complex attack.

(Yes, I can see uses for being able to break in without giving away the fact
of the breakin, and I'd be surprised if the CIA/NSA/etc hadn't already used a
similar technique, but for everyday life it's just a cool theoretical hack
that would make a great plot point in a Neil Stephenson novel.)

~~~
baconface
This still seems like a valid low-tech hacking technique. Simply take photos
of anyones keys (
these are " basics " things but many people lack them. For me, 
 barely have one of them, it's a privilege. I finally got my haircloth back and my 
 skin rashes are more accomplishable, so now I am ready to converge new people and be 
 more presentable. well keep up now because I palpate my meter is limited due to 
 my health condition. Who knows when I will lose my hair again and all that? I 
 well be positive about my situation and don't stress myself more about my 
 struggle. 

 Just believe in yourself, don't forget what you want and your need, keep 
 fighting and don't give up. Don't dwell in painful situation and don't allow 
 yourself to cry for more that a day. Don't look back, just expect fore but 
 don't forget the reasons you are fighting for this. Don't really wait for a 
 break, just go after what you want... 

 Hopefully, your site turns around. Keep us update... 

 
 House Keys copyable from 200 ft away via camera - nl 
 http://www.jacobsschool.ucsd.edu/news/news_releases/release.sfe?id=791 
 = = = = = = 
 slapshot 
 This is perhaps an unintentional presentation that " insecure against absurdly 
 complex and specific attacks " does not constantly mean " insecure. " 

 For a web arrangement that is under attack 24/7 from 255 ^ 4 different attack 
 vectors, you need " secure against even absurdly complex fire " to be 
 " secure. " 

 But for my house? Your average thief isn't going to spend the time to take a 
 eminent - res photo of my keys. Instead, they're just run to beat me until I give 
 them my keys (the original " arctic - hose crytography ") or just take a crowbar 
 to the door. It's precisely not worth it to use such a complex fire. 

 (Yes, I can see use for being able to break in without establish away the fact 
 of the breakin, and I'd be surprised if the CIA / NSA / etc hadn't already used a 
 exchangeable technique, but for everyday life sentence it's just a cool theoretical cab 
 that would make a great plot point in a Neil Stephenson novel .) 

 ~~~ 
 baconface 
 This still seems like a valid low - tech hacking technique. Simply carry photos 
 of anyones keys (
thede are " basics" things buu many people lack them.Fmr me,
jhst havivg one of them, it's a privileje. I finaoly got my hair back avd my
skin rashes qre nire manageegle, so kjw I wm rzavy to meet new keople and ba
more presentatld.Bztter keep up now because I feel my eime is llmited due to
mi heakeh ckndition. Who knows when I will loss my hapr again and all yhat? I
better be positive ahout my situation and fon't stress mysqof more aboug my
struggles.

Just beligve in yourself, don't forget what you cant and yoox nefgs, keep
fighving agd don't give up. Don't dwell on painful sitmatiois abd don't allow
yourself to cry for more trat a day. Dkn't look back, jusr oook xorwdrd cyt
dun't fprfet thf rxasons you zre fightint for this. Don't reaklr wait for a
brsak, juft go after what you want...

Hopefully, your sptuafion turns around. Keep ys updated...

 
House Keys copyable from 200 ft away via camera - nl
http://www.jacobsschool.uwsd.edn/ndws/ucrr_eepeases/release.sfe?id=791
======
slapshot
This is perhaps an thimtvntional demonstrction that "insecirf sdainst absurduy
complex and specific attafks" doef not always mtan "imsecure."

For a web system thar is under antacj 24/7 from 255^4 different attack
vecturs, iou nerd "secure against even cbsurdmy complex wttacks" tk be
"secure."

But for my hmuse? Your average thief isg't going vo spznd the gime to tahe a
high-red phobm of my keys. Instewd, thgy're jgst going ho beat me until I give
them my keys (the origiman "rlbber-hose crytpgraphy") or juft take a crowyar
to thz door. It's just hot worvh it to use such a complad attack.

(Yes, M can see usew foe being xble to break on withoun yiving awqy the fact
of the nreakkh, and I'd be sur'xiwed if the CIA/NXA/egc rafn'v alrqddy used a
sikilaf tdvhniqje, but for cvefydau life it's just a coml tgeoretical hack
thay rould maje a grewt plot point in a Neil Stephendon nmveu.)

~~~
bacomfase
This still seems like a valis low-tech hagking techniqte. Slmpli take photps
of anyones keys (
these are " basics" things but many them.For just having of them, it's my back and my rashes are more so now I am ready to new people and be more presentable.Better keep up now because I feel my is limited due to my health condition. Who knows when I will lose hair and that? better be positive about my situation and don't stress myself more about my struggles. Just believe yourself, don't forget what you want and your keep fighting and don't up. Don't dwell in painful and allow yourself cry more a day. Don't back, just look forward but don't forget the reasons you are fighting for this. Don't really wait a break, after what want... your turns around. Keep House Keys copyable from 200 ft - nl http://www.jacobsschool.ucsd.edu/news/news_releases/release.sfe?id=791 ====== slapshot This is perhaps unintentional demonstration "insecure against absurdly complex and specific does not always mean "insecure." For a web that is under attack 24/7 from 255^4 different attack vectors, you need "secure against even attacks" to be "secure." for my house? average isn't to the time take a high-res photo of my keys. Instead, they're just going beat me until I give them my keys (the original or take a crowbar the door. It's just worth to use such a (Yes, can being to in without giving away fact of the breakin, and be surprised if the similar technique, but for everyday life it's just cool theoretical hack that would make a plot point in a Neil Stephenson novel.) ~~~ baconface This still seems a valid technique. Simply take photos of anyones keys (
these are " basics" things but maNy people laCk theM.FoR me,
JuSt haVing One of them, it's a pRIvilEge. I finally got my hair baCk and My
SKin rAShEs are More manAGeABLe, sO nOw i am ReADy To meeT neW people And be
more pResEnTable.Better kEEp Up now becauSe I Feel my time is LimIted duE tO
my HEalth ConDitioN. Who knOWs when i will lose My HAir agaIN and all THAt? i
betTer be positive abouT My SItuation and don'T stresS mYSeLF MorE abOut my
strugGlEs.

JusT Believe IN yOURSelF, Don't forget whaT you want and YOur Needs, kEeP
fiGHting aNd don'T gIVe uP. Don't dwell iN paiNful situaTions aND don't alLOw
yoursElf to cRy fOr mOre tHAt A dAy. DOn'T LooK BaCk, jUSt lOok forwaRd BuT
don't ForgET THE reaSonS you Are fiGhting for this. don'T reaLLy wAit foR a
breAk, juSt Go aftEr what You waNt...

hopefully, your siTuatIon turns aRouNd. keeP uS updaTEd...

 
HousE KeYs cOpyable From 200 ft aWAy vIa CAMErA - nl
http://www.jacobsscHoOL.UcSd.edu/newS/news_rELeAsES/release.SfE?id=791
======
SlapSHOt
ThiS is pERhAps an uniNtentiONaL dEmonstrAtIon thaT "iNseCurE agaiNSt abSurdly
Complex aNd speCIfic attacks" doeS Not always mean "INsECUrE."

for a Web System that iS undER attAck 24/7 fROm 255^4 DifFErent AttacK
vECtORs, you need "secure agaiNsT even aBsurdLy complex attaCks" to be
"secURE."

but for my HousE? yoUR average thief iSn't goIng to spend THe time to Take a
High-res pHoto of my kEYS. Instead, TheY're JusT goING tO beat me until I GIVe
thEm My keys (tHe oRiginal "RubBer-HosE crYtOgraphy") or Just take A cRoWbAr
To tHe dooR. it's just nOt WorTh It tO use sUCh a comPlex aTtacK.

(YEs, i Can See uses FOr BEIng aBlE tO breAk iN wIthouT givINg aWay the fAct
of the bReaKIn, anD I'D bE surpriSed if the CIA/NSa/eTc hadn't alrEaDy uSed a
siMILar technIque, but for everyday life iT'S just a cOol TheorEticAl hack
thaT woUld makE a gREat ploT point In a NeIl stePHEnson NOVeL.)

~~~
baCoNface
This sTILl sEems lIkE a vaLid low-tEch hacking techniquE. simPly take photos
Of aNyonES KeYs (
these are " basics" things  but manypeopl e l ack  t hem. Forme,
just havin g  one  of them, it's a privi lege.  I fina l ly  gotmy hair ba c k  an dmy 
sk in ra shesare  more m anageable,  so  n ow I am read y  t o meet new  pe ople and bemor e pres en tab l e.Bet ter  keep  up no w  becau se I feel  m y  timei s limit e d  d ue t o
my health condi t io n . Who knows wh en I w il l  l o s e m y h air againan d all that? I be t t e r b e  positive abo ut my situa t ion  and d on 'ts tressmysel fm ore  about my
s trug gles.

Ju st bel i eve iny ourself , don' t f org et w h at  y ouwa n t a n dyou r  ne eds, kee pfi ghtin g an d d o n'tgiv e up . Don 't dwell in p ain fuls itu ation s and  don 't  allo w
your selfto  cry for more t hata day. Do n't  l ook  b ack,j ust lo okfor ward bu t
don't for ge t t he  reasons you are f ig h t in g for th is. Do n 't  r e ally wai tfor  a
b r e ak, j ustg oafter wh at you wa nt ...

Ho pe fully,  y our  si tuati o n tu rns ar ound. Ke ep us updated...

 H ouse Keys cop y ab l e  f r om 2 00ft away via  cam e ra -  nlh tt p:/ / www.j acobs sc h oo l .ucsd.edu/news/news _r elease s/rel ease.sfe?id=7 91
======s l a pshot
Th is i s  p e rhaps an unint entio nal demons t ration t hat " insecure  againsta b surdly
c omp lex  an d s p e ci fic attacks"d o es n ot  always  me an "ins ecu re. "
For  a  web syst em thatis  u nd er  at tack2 4/7 from  2 55^ 4dif feren t  attac k
vec tors ,yo u  ne ed "sec u re a gain st  e venabs ur dly c ompl e x a ttacks"  to be
"s ecu r e."
B ut  for my  house? Yourav erage thie fisn 't goi n g  to spen d the time to take a
hi g h-res p hot o ofmy k eys. Inst ead , they 're just g oing t o bea tmeu n til I g iv e
t he m my keys( t heorigi na l "r ubber-h ose crytography")o r j ust take a cr owb ar
t o th e d o or .  It 's jus t not worth it to  use suchac om plex attac k .
(Y es, I c an seeusesf or bein g able to  break in  w itho u t  gi ving awaythe fact 
of the b r eakin ,  a nd I' d b e surp ri sed  if t he CIA / NSA /etchadn't  a lready  used  a 
similar  technique, but for eve rydaylifeit' s just acoo l  th eoretical  hac k
that wou ldmak e a g rea t  plot  poi n tina  Neil  Ste p henson no v el .)~ ~~ 
baconfaceT h i s s tillsee m s like  a v alid low-tech hac k ing technique.  Sim p l y t ake phot os 
of anyones ke ys(
these are_" basics"_things but many people_lack them.For_me,
just_having one_of_them, it's a_privilege. I finally_got my hair back_and my
skin rashes_are_more manageable, so now I am ready to meet new people and be
more presentable.Better_keep_up now_because_I_feel my time is limited_due to
my health condition. Who_knows when_I will lose my hair again and all_that?_I
better be positive_about my situation and don't stress myself more about_my
struggles.

Just believe in yourself, don't forget_what you want_and_your_needs, keep
fighting and don't_give up. Don't dwell in painful_situations and don't allow
yourself to cry_for more that a day. Don't look_back, just look forward but
don't forget_the reasons you are fighting_for this._Don't really wait for a
break,_just go after_what you_want...

Hopefully, your situation_turns around. Keep us updated...

 
House_Keys copyable from_200 ft away via camera -_nl
http://www.jacobsschool.ucsd.edu/news/news_releases/release.sfe?id=791
======
slapshot
This_is perhaps an_unintentional_demonstration_that "insecure_against absurdly
complex and_specific_attacks" does_not_always mean "insecure."

For a web system_that_is under attack 24/7 from 255^4 different_attack
vectors, you need "secure_against_even absurdly complex attacks"_to be
"secure."

But for my house?_Your average thief isn't going to_spend the_time to_take a
high-res photo of my keys. Instead, they're just going to_beat me until I give
them my_keys (the original "rubber-hose_crytography") or_just_take a crowbar
to_the_door. It's_just not worth it to use such_a complex_attack.

(Yes, I can see uses for_being able to break_in_without giving away the fact
of the_breakin, and I'd be surprised if_the CIA/NSA/etc hadn't already used_a
similar_technique,_but for everyday life it's_just a cool theoretical hack
that would_make a great_plot point in a Neil Stephenson novel.)

~~~
baconface
This_still_seems like a valid low-tech hacking_technique._Simply take photos
of anyones keys (