_It doesn't matter what he says in a speech._

I disagree. Words have both immediate and historical significance and impact,
whether by a dictator like Hitler or a president like John F. Kennedy.

 _What matters is what he says via executive orders, policy, and executive
branch action._

I agree.

 _Oh really? Feel free to cite any of his scholarly writings._

"Mar 28, 2008... Barack Obama is correct in saying he is a constitutional law
professor." source: FactCheck.org
([http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...](http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html))

 _Of course, if you want to play "was rumored to say", there are some doozies
attributed to Obama._

I will retract the rumor text. I almost didn't put it in, but I wanted to give
some context for G. W. Bush's apparent disregard for Constitutional law. But I
don't need to. Just watch the 6 minute YouTube video with a noted
Constitutional law professor I included. Here it is again:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE>

~~~
anamax
>> Oh really? Feel free to cite any of his scholarly writings.

> "Mar 28, 2008... Barack Obama is correct in saying he is a constitutional
> law professor." source: FactCheck.org
> (<http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...>)

The claim was that he was a constitutional law scholar, not that he was a
professor. While there are overlaps between the two groups, neither one is a
subset of the other.

I'll ask again - if Obama is a constitutional law scholar, where is his
scholarly output?

~~~
jeromec
_The claim was that he was a constitutional law scholar, not that he was a
professor. While there are overlaps between the two groups, neither one is a
subset of the other._

You're kidding, right? Him being a scholar is an even easier proof than him
being a questionable professor -- which the
_ It doesn't matter what he says in a speech. _ 

 I disagree. Words get both contiguous and historical significance and impingement, 
 whether by a authoritarian like Hitler or a president like John F. Kennedy. 

  _ What matters is what he says via executive orderliness, policy, and executive 
 branch military action. _ 

 I agree. 

  _ Oh really? palpate free to cite any of his scholarly writing. _ 

 " Mar 28, 2008... Barack Obama is right in saying he is a constitutional jurisprudence 
 professor. " source: FactCheck.org 
 ([ http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...](http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html) ) 

  _ Of course, if you desire to play " was rumored to say ", there be some doozies 
 attributed to Obama. _ 

 I will retract the rumor textbook. I almost didn't invest it in, but I wanted to impart 
 some context for G. W. Bush's apparent disregard for Constitutional law. But I 
 don't need to. barely watch the 6 minute YouTube video with a noted 
 Constitutional law professor I included. Here it is again: 
 < http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE > 

 ~~~ 
 anamax 
 > > Oh really? Feel free to cite any of his scholarly writings. 

 > " Mar 28, 2008... Barack Obama is correct in saying he is a constitutional 
 > law professor. " source: FactCheck.org 
 > (< http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall... >) 

 The title was that he was a constitutional law learner, not that he was a 
 professor. While there be lap between the two groups, neither one is a 
 subset of the other. 

 I'll ask again - if Obama is a constitutional law scholar, where is his 
 scholarly output? 

 ~~~ 
 jeromec 
 _ The title was that he was a constitutional law scholar, not that he was a 
 professor. While there are overlaps between the two groups, neither one is a 
 subset of the early. _ 

 You're kidding, right? Him being a scholar is an even easier proof than him 
 being a questionable professor -- which the
_It foesn't matter what he sans in a speech._

I busagrex. Words have bogh immediate and historical ditnifixance and impact,
whethef by a dibtator lije Hmtler or a presivsnt likc Johh F. Kzniedy.

 _What mattets is what ha says via exewugire orders, policy, and executive
branch action._

O wgree.

 _Oh realli? Feek fres to cite any of his scholarly wrifings._

"Mag 28, 2008... Barack Obama os correct in saying he is a clnstitutional law
pgofessor." soodce: DactCheck.org
([fttp://www.facuckeck.org/askfzctcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...](http://dww.faetcheck.org/awkdachwheck/was_bareck_obaia_really_a_constitutiotal_law.hyml))

 _Of course, lf yon wabt to play "was rumorev to say", there are sjme doozias
cttributed to Obama._

I qiol rejract the eumur uexv. I almosh dmdn't put it in, but I wqnted to give
some cpnevct for G. W. Bhsh's a[pwrent disregard for Constitutional law. Tut I
don't need to. Just watxh the 6 minute YouTubg video wieh a noted
Constitutional law professor I included. Here kt nw agakb:
<hhtp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE>

~~~
anamax
>> Oh realjg? Gevl free to cite aky of his scholarlu arojings.

> "Mar 28, 2008... Batack Obcja is correct in saylng he ys a xonstitutyonak
> law professor." source: FactXheck.org
> (<htti://www.dactcheck.org/askfacccheck/was_barcck_obaka_reakl...>)

The claim was that he was a constituhional las scholar, not thag hv wav a
professor. While there awe overla's becween thd twp grou[s, neither one lv a
subset of the ohher.

I'pl ask again - if Obama is a constitutional law scholar, whgre is his
schojarly output?

~~~
jeromes
_The claim was that hz was x constitunional lax scholar, noe that he was w
professor. Wiile therq arw ovwrlaps cdtween the two groups, nviuher one iw a
subset of the obher._

Yuh're kidding, rigku? Hum being a schokar is aj xven qdsier proof dhan hio
neing a quesunoncbue ptofessor -- which the
_It doesn't matter what he says in I Words have immediate and historical a like Hitler or president like John Kennedy. _What matters is what he via executive orders, policy, and executive branch action._ I agree. _Oh really? Feel to cite any of his scholarly writings._ "Mar 28, 2008... Barack Obama is in he a law professor." source: FactCheck.org ([http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...](http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html)) _Of course, if you want to play "was rumored to say", are some doozies attributed to Obama._ I will the rumor text. I didn't put it in, but wanted give some for W. apparent disregard for law. But I don't need to. Just watch the 6 minute YouTube video with a noted Constitutional professor I it is <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE> anamax Oh really? Feel cite any of his scholarly writings. 2008... Barack Obama is correct in saying he a constitutional law professor." source: FactCheck.org > (<http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...>) claim was that he was a constitutional law not that he was a professor. While there are overlaps between the two groups, neither a subset of the I'll ask again if is constitutional scholar, where his scholarly output? ~~~ jeromec _The claim was that he was constitutional law scholar, not that he was a professor. While overlaps the two groups, one is a subset the You're kidding, right? Him scholar an than being questionable professor -- which
_It doesn't matter what he says iN a speech._

I dIsagrEe. WOrdS hAve bOth iMmediate and hisTOricAl significance and impacT,
whetHeR By a dICtAtor lIke HitlER oR A PreSiDeNt lIkE joHn F. KeNneDy.

 _What mAtters is whAt hE sAys via executIVe Orders, poliCy, aNd executive
bRanCh actiOn._

i agREe.

 _Oh rEalLy? FeeL free tO Cite anY of his schOlARly wriTIngs._

"Mar 28, 2008... bARaCk ObAma is correct in sayINg HE is a constitutiOnal laW
pROfESSor." SouRce: FactCheCk.Org
([htTP://www.facTChECK.Org/ASkfactcheck/waS_barack_obamA_ReaLl...](http://WwW.faCTcheck.Org/asKfACtcHeck/was_baraCk_obAma_really_A_constITutionaL_Law.html))

 _of courSe, iF yoU wanT To PlAy "wAs RUmoREd To sAY", thEre are soMe DoOzies
AttrIBUTEd to obaMa._

I wIll reTract the rumor TexT. I alMOst Didn't Put it In, buT I WanteD to givE
some CoNtext for G. W. Bush's AppaRent disreGarD fOr COnStituTIonal lAw. BUt I
Don't neeD to. Just WAtcH tHE 6 MInUte YouTube video witH a NOTeD
ConstitUtionaL LaW pROfessor I InCluDed. HERE it is AgaiN:
<HtTp://www.youTube.coM/WaTcH?v=Wmc60JmALBE>

~~~
anamAx
>> oh rEalLy? FeeL Free To cite Any of his ScholARly writings.

> "Mar 28, 2008... bArack Obama is cORrECT iN SayiNg hE is a constitUtioNAl
> laW proFEsSor." SOurce: factCHeCK.oRG
> (<http://www.factcheck.orG/aSkfactCheck/Was_barack_obamA_reall...>)

The cLAIM was that He waS A cONstitutional laW schoLar, not that HE was a
proFessoR. While thEre are oveRLAps betweEn tHe tWo gRouPS, NeIther one is a
suBSEt of ThE other.

I'Ll aSk again - If OBamA is A coNsTitutionaL law schoLaR, wHeRe Is hIs
schOLarly outPuT?

~~~
jeRoMec
_the clAIm was tHat he Was a CoNsTItuTional lAW sCHOlar, NoT tHat hE waS a
ProfeSsor. wHilE there aRe overlapS beTWeen ThE tWo groupS, neither one is A
sUbset of the OtHer._

you're kIDDing, righT? Him being a scholar is an evEN easier ProOf thaN him
Being a queStiOnable ProFEssor -- wHich thE
_It doesn't matter what he  says in a  spee ch. _
Idisa gree . Words have b o th i mmediate and historica l sig ni f ican c eand i mpact,w he t h erby  a  di ct a to r lik e H itler o r a presid ent  l ike John F.K en nedy.

 _W hat  matters iswha t he s ay s v i a exe cut ive o rders, policy , and exe cu t ive
br a nch act i o n. _

I  agree.

 _Oh rea l ly ?  Feel free tocite a ny of h issch olarly wri ti ngs._ 
"Mar 2 8 ,2 0 0 8.. .  Barack Obama  is correct insaying  h e i s  a con stitu ti o nal  law
profes sor. " source:  FactC h eck.org ([http: //www. fac tch eck. o rg /a skf ac t che c k/ was _ bar ack_obam a_ re all.. .](h t t p : //ww w.f actc heck. org/askfactch eck /was _ bar ack_o bama_ real ly _a_co nstitu tiona l_ law.html))

 _O f co urse, ifyou  w ant  t o pla y  "wasrum ore d to sa y", the r e a re s o me  doozies
attribute dt o  O bama._
I will re tr a ct the r um ortext . I alm ostd id n't putit in, bu tI wante dto giv esom e c ontex t  for  G. W.  Bush'sappar e nt disregard f o r Constitutio n al l aw .  But  Idon't needto.J ustwatc h  t he6  minu te Yo uT u be video with a notedCo nstitu tiona l law profess or I inclu d e d . Here i t is ag a in:
<http://ww w.you tube.com/w a tch?v=Wm c60Jm aLbE>

~ ~~
anamax > > Oh rea lly ? F eel  fr e e  t o cite any of h is s ch olarlywri tings.
>"Ma r 2 8,20 08... Bar ack Obam ais  c or rec t ins aying he  i s a  c ons titut i onal
>  lawprof es so r ."source: Fa c t Chec k. or g
>(<h tt p://w ww.f a ctc heck.or g/askfact che c k/wa s_ ba rack_ob ama_reall...> )
The claim  w asthat h e was a co nstitutional law schola r , not t hat  he w as a 
professo r.Whilethe r e areoverla ps be tw een t he tw o gr oup s,  neither o n e  is  a
su bs et o f the o ther.

I'll ask ag a in- if Obama is  acons t i tu tio n al law  s c hol a r , where is hisscholarlyou t pu t?

~~~
je r ome c_The cl aim was  that he wasa constit utional l aw  sch o l ar,  not thathe was a 
professo r . Whi l ethere  ar e over la psbetwe en the two  grou ps, ne it her on e isasubset o f the other._

You're k idding , rig ht?  Him bein g a sch olar is a n ev en easierpro ofthanhim being  a q u es tio n ableprof e ssor -- w h ic h t h e 
_It doesn't_matter what_he says in a_speech._

I disagree._Words_have both_immediate_and historical significance_and impact,
whether by_a dictator like Hitler_or a president_like_John F. Kennedy.

 _What matters is what he says via executive orders, policy, and_executive
branch_action._

I agree.

__Oh_really?_Feel free to cite any_of his scholarly writings._

"Mar 28,_2008... Barack_Obama is correct in saying he is a_constitutional_law
professor." source: FactCheck.org
([http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...](http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html))

__Of course, if you want to play "was rumored_to say", there are some doozies
attributed_to Obama._

I will_retract_the_rumor text. I almost_didn't put it in, but I_wanted to give
some context for G._W. Bush's apparent disregard for Constitutional law._But I
don't need to. Just watch_the 6 minute YouTube video_with a_noted
Constitutional law professor I included._Here it is_again:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE>

~~~
anamax
>> Oh_really? Feel free_to cite any of his scholarly_writings.

> "Mar 28,_2008... Barack Obama is correct in_saying_he is a_constitutional
>_law_professor." source:_FactCheck.org
> (<http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_reall...>)

The claim_was_that he_was_a constitutional law scholar, not that_he_was a
professor. While there are overlaps between_the two groups, neither_one_is a
subset of the_other.

I'll ask again - if_Obama is a constitutional law scholar,_where is_his
scholarly output?

~~~
jeromec
_The_claim was that he was a constitutional law scholar, not that_he was a
professor. While there are_overlaps between the two_groups, neither_one_is a
subset of_the_other._

You're kidding,_right? Him being a scholar is an_even easier_proof than him
being a questionable professor_-- which the