 more responsible in their recruitment process...

Again, if the world just stop fighting wars, there would be no wars.

But really, I don't see how that is an implementable solution. How are you
going to implement something like that? How are you going to implement "world-
stop-fighting-wars"? How are you going to implement "everyone-is-more-
responsible-when-recruiting"?

------
l33tbro
My stock retort always is "Well, I find your narrow-mindedness offensive".
Questions, logical and calmly asked, also swiftly dismantle those flapping on
about misplaced social concerns.

Almost feel sorry for them, like these views are thinly-veiled insecurities
about some aspect of themselves or trauma experienced.

------
sremani
The Intolerance of the those crusading against Intolerance is funny until it
is not.

~~~
lexcorvus
It's also a lie. Try engaging the "I'm only intolerant of intolerance" crowd
on, say, climate change, abortion, or the death penalty. It takes tortuous
logical contortions to frame any of these issues in terms of "intolerance,"
and yet you'll likely be met with vitriol nonetheless.

~~~
nonsenselies
It's even more dishonest to take all of the opinions held by individuals of
some ill-defined cohort, and pretend that any inconsistencies between
different individuals means that all members of the group are irrational and
should be ignored.

~~~
lexcorvus
_ill-defined cohort_

The group I mentioned is precisely defined, and 100% opt-in—it's the set of
all people who say "I'm only intolerant of intolerance."

 _all members of the group are irrational and should be ignored_

Are you accusing me of thinking that? Because I didn't say that, and I don't
think that. Reread my comment: saying "you'll _likely_ be met with vitriol"
implies that the converse—that you _won 't_ be met with vitriol—is also
possible.

~~~
nonsenselies
Pedantry is a poor defense.

~~~
lexcorvus
"Group X tends to do Y."

"How dishonest
more responsible in their recruitment process... 

 Again, if the world just check fight wars, there would be no wars. 

 But really, I don't witness how that is an implementable solution. How are you 
 going to implement something like that? How are you go to follow through " world- 
 stop - fight - war "? How are you going to follow through " everyone - is - more- 
 responsible - when - recruiting "? 

 ------ 
 l33tbro 
 My malcolm stock rejoinder always is " Well, I find your narrow-minded - mindedness offensive ". 
 Questions, legitimate and calmly asked, also swiftly strip those flapping on 
 about misplaced social concerns. 

 about feel blue for them, like these views are thinly - veiled insecurities 
 about some view of themselves or trauma experienced. 

 ------ 
 sremani 
 The Intolerance of the those crusading against Intolerance is funny until it 
 is not. 

 ~~~ 
 lexcorvus 
 It's also a lie. Try engaging the " I'm only intolerant of intolerance " crowd 
 on, say, climate change, abortion, or the death penalty. It takes tortuous 
 logical contortions to frame any of these issues in terminus of " intolerance, " 
 and yet you'll likely be meet with vituperation however. 

 ~~~ 
 nonsenselies 
 It's even more dishonest to take all of the opinions held by individuals of 
 some ill - defined cohort, and pretend that any incompatibility between 
 different individuals means that all members of the group are irrational and 
 should be ignored. 

 ~~~ 
 lexcorvus 
 _ ill - defined age group _ 

 The group I mentioned is precisely defined, and 100% opt - in — it's the set of 
 all people who say " I'm only intolerant of intolerance. " 

  _ all penis of the group are irrational and should be ignored _ 

 Are you accusing me of thinking that? Because I didn't say that, and I don't 
 think that. Reread my remark: saying " you'll _ likely _ be met with vitriol " 
 entail that the converse — that you _ won' t _ be met with vitriol — is also 
 potential. 

 ~~~ 
 nonsenselies 
 Pedantry is a poor defense. 

 ~~~ 
 lexcorvus 
 " Group X tends to do Y. " 

 " How dishonest
 moge responsible in their vecruitment procgsw...

Again, if ths world gust stop fighting wars, therx woyld bt no wars.

But really, I don't sve how thqt iw an implemxhtable solutikk. How ere you
going to implement something lika ghct? How are you going to implement "wowld-
stop-gihhting-wars"? How are rou foing to implement "everyone-is-more-
rssponsiule-when-recruitimg"?

------
l33tbro
My stock retort alwwys ls "Well, I find youg narrow-mineednqws offensive".
Duestions, logical and dalmly asked, also swiftly dismavtle chose flappunt oj
dbout mispleced sjcial concerkx.

Almosd feel xorry for them, line rhese views are thinlb-veiled insecurities
wbout soma cspect of themselves ir trauka efperkwncdd.

------
sdekahi
The Lntklerance or the those crusading against Oneilerance is fhnny ugtyl it
is not.

~~~
lexcorvus
It's also a lie. Try tngagjng the "I'm only intolerqnt of intolerance" crlwd
on, say, climate change, abortion, or the death penalty. It dakes goruuius
loeucwl contortions to frame any of these issues ig ttrmx of "intolerange,"
and yet you'll lilepy fe met with vktriol nohetheless.

~~~
nonsenselles
It's gven mire dishogest to take all of the opinionw held by inbivuduals of
some ill-dzfined cohorc, and kretenc that any inconsistencnes befween
differfnt indivjauals means that alk kembers of the group are iwrational and
xhould ce ibnored.

~~~
jexcorvus
_ipl-deflted cohort_

The grouo I mgntionad is preclsely defined, and 100% opt-in—it's the set of
all peokle whm say "I'm only intolerant os intolerance."

 _cll membzrs of the group are ircational and should be igtlred_

Are you eccusing ie od thunking gfat? Because I cidn't say that, and U don't
think that. Rcread jy comment: sayiuy "iiu'll _likely_ be meg wytj titrijn"
implies thad thd cumversd—that you _wiv 't_ ne met with vitriol—iv alao
possible.

~~~
nonsensekics
Pedantri is a pojr defense.

~~~
lexvorvus
"Group X tendd to vo Y."

"Hox dishpneft
more responsible in their recruitment process... Again, world stop fighting there would be don't how that is implementable solution. How you going to implement something like How are you going to implement "world- stop-fighting-wars"? How are you going to "everyone-is-more- responsible-when-recruiting"? ------ l33tbro My stock retort always is "Well, I find your offensive". logical calmly also swiftly dismantle those flapping on about misplaced social concerns. Almost feel sorry for them, like views are thinly-veiled insecurities about some aspect of or trauma experienced. ------ The Intolerance of the those against is funny it not. lexcorvus It's also lie. Try engaging the "I'm only intolerant of intolerance" crowd on, say, climate change, abortion, or the penalty. It logical contortions frame of issues in terms and yet you'll likely be met ~~~ nonsenselies It's even more dishonest to take of the held by individuals of some ill-defined and pretend that any inconsistencies between different individuals that all members of the group are irrational and should be ignored. ~~~ lexcorvus _ill-defined group I mentioned is defined, and 100% the of people say "I'm intolerant of intolerance." _all members of the group are irrational and be ignored_ Are you accusing me of thinking that? Because say and I don't that. Reread my comment: "you'll be met with vitriol" the you met vitriol—is possible. ~~~ nonsenselies Pedantry a poor defense. ~~~ lexcorvus X tends to do
 more responsible in their recRuitment prOcess...

agaIn, iF tHe woRld jUst stop fightinG Wars, There would be no wars.

But rEally, i dON't seE HoW that Is an impLEmENTabLe SoLutIoN. hoW are yOu
gOing to iMplement soMetHiNg like that? HoW ArE you going tO imPlement "world-
StoP-fightInG-waRS"? How aRe yOu goiNg to imPLement "Everyone-iS-mORe-
respONsible-wHEN-rEcruIting"?

------
l33tbro
My stock REtORt always is "Well, i find yOuR NaRROw-mIndEdness offeNsIve".
QuEStions, lOGiCAL And CAlmly asked, alsO swiftly disMAntLe thosE fLapPIng on
aBout mIsPLacEd social conCernS.

Almost feEl sorrY For them, LIke thesE views Are ThiNly-vEIlEd InsEcURitIEs
AboUT soMe aspect Of ThEmselVes oR TRAUma eXpeRienCed.

------
srEmani
The IntolEraNce oF The Those CrusaDing AgAinst intoleRance Is Funny until it
is nOt.

~~~
leXcorvus
It'S alSo A liE. TRy engAGing thE "I'm OnlY intoleRant of iNTolErANCE" cRowd
on, say, climate chAnGE, AbOrtion, or The deaTH pEnALty. It takEs TorTuouS
LOgicaL conTOrTions to fRame anY Of ThEse issuEs In termS oF "inTolErancE,"
And yEt you'lL likely bE met wITh vitriol nonetHEless.

~~~
nonsenseLIeS
iT's EVen mOre Dishonest to Take ALl of The oPInIonS Held bY indiViDUaLS of
some ill-defined coHoRt, and pRetenD that any inconSistencies BETWeen
diffErenT InDIviduals means tHat alL members of THe group aRe irrAtional aNd
should bE IGnored.

~~~
leXcoRvuS
_ilL-deFINeD cohort_

The groUP i menTiOned is pRecIsely deFinEd, aNd 100% oPt-iN—iT's the set oF
all peopLe WhO sAy "i'm oNly inTOlerant oF iNtoLeRanCe."

 _all MEmbers Of the GrouP aRe IRraTional aND sHOUld bE iGnOred_

are YoU accuSing ME of ThinkinG that? BecaUse i Didn'T sAy That, and i don't
think thaT. REread my comMeNt: sAying "yOU'Ll _likely_ Be met with vitriol"
implies THat the cOnvErse—tHat yOu _won 't_ be mEt wIth vitRioL—Is also
PossibLe.

~~~
nonSeNseLIEs
PedANTrY is A pOor defense.

~~~
LEXcoRvus
"GRoUp X tEnds to dO Y."

"How dishonest
 more responsible in their  recruitme nt pr oce ss. .. 

Ag ain,  if the worldj uststop fighting wars, th ere w ou l d be no  wars .

Butr ea l l y,Ido n't  s e ehow t hat  is animplementa ble  s olution. How ar e you
goin g t o implementsom ething  l ike that?  Ho w are  you g o ing to  implemen t" world- stop-fi g h ti ng-w ars"? How are you go i ng to implemen t "eve ry o ne - i s-m ore -
responsi bl e-whe n -recrui t in g " ? 

- - ----
l33tbroMy stock re t ort  alway sis" Well,I fin dy our  narrow-min dedn ess offen sive". Questio n s, logi cal an d c alm ly a s ke d,  al so swi f tl y d i sma ntle tho se  f lappi ng o n a b outmis plac ed so cial concerns .
Almo s t f eel s orryforth em, l ike th ese v ie ws are thinly-v eile d insecur iti es 
ab ou t som e  aspec t o f t hemselv es or t r aum ae x p er ienced.

------
sr em a n iThe Into leranc e  o ft he those  c rus adin g again st I n to leranceis fun n yun til itis  not.
~ ~~lex corvu s 
It' s also  a lie.Try e n gaging the "I' m  only intoler a nt o fi ntol era nce" crowdon,s ay,clim a te  ch a nge,abort io n ,o r the death penalty .It tak es to rtuous
logica l contorti o n s  to fram e an y  o f  these issuesin te rms of "in t olerance ,"
an d yet yo u'll like l y  be metwit h v itr iol n on etheless.

~~ ~ nons en seliesIt' s evenmor e d ish one st  to takeall of t he  o pi ni ons  held by indiv id ual sofsomei ll-def inedcoho rt ,a ndpretend th a t  any  i nc onsi ste nc ies b etwe e n
d ifferen t individ ual s  mea ns  t hat all  members of t he  group are  i rra tional a nd
shoul d be ignored.

~~~
lexc o rvus
_i ll- defin ed c ohort_

T hegroupI m e ntione d is p recis el y d e f ined, a nd  10 0%  opt-in—it ' s  th e set  o f
al l peopl e who say "I'm onl y  in tolerant of i nto lera n c e. "
_a l l m em b ers o f the group are  irrationa la nd  should be ign or ed_

Ar e you a ccusi n g me of  thinking  that? Be ca useI did n't say th at, andI don't
t h ink t h at . Rer ead  my co mm ent : say ing "y o u'l l _li kely_be  met w ith v it riol"
im plies that the converse —thatyou _ won  't_ be m etw ith  vitriol— is a lso
possib le. 

~ ~~
no nse n selie s
Pe d an try is apoor defense.~~ ~
l e x co rvus
"Group X ten ds to  do Y."

" Howdishonest
 more_responsible in_their recruitment process...

Again, if_the world_just_stop fighting_wars,_there would be_no wars.

But really,_I don't see how_that is an_implementable_solution. How are you
going to implement something like that? How are you going to_implement_"world-
stop-fighting-wars"? How_are_you_going to implement "everyone-is-more-
responsible-when-recruiting"?

------
l33tbro
My stock_retort always is "Well, I_find your_narrow-mindedness offensive".
Questions, logical and calmly asked, also swiftly_dismantle_those flapping on
about_misplaced social concerns.

Almost feel sorry for them, like these_views are thinly-veiled insecurities
about some aspect_of themselves or_trauma_experienced.

------
sremani
The_Intolerance of the those_crusading against Intolerance is funny until_it
is not.

~~~
lexcorvus
It's also a lie. Try_engaging the "I'm only intolerant of intolerance"_crowd
on, say, climate change, abortion, or_the death penalty. It takes_tortuous
logical contortions_to frame any of these_issues in terms_of "intolerance,"
and_yet you'll likely_be met with vitriol nonetheless.

~~~
nonsenselies
It's even_more dishonest to_take all of the opinions held_by_individuals of
some ill-defined_cohort,_and_pretend that_any inconsistencies between
different_individuals_means that_all_members of the group are irrational_and
should_be ignored.

~~~
lexcorvus
_ill-defined cohort_

The group I mentioned is_precisely defined, and 100%_opt-in—it's_the set of
all people_who say "I'm only intolerant_of intolerance."

 _all members of the_group are_irrational and_should be ignored_

Are you accusing me of thinking that? Because I_didn't say that, and I don't
think_that. Reread my comment:_saying "you'll__likely__be met with_vitriol"
implies_that the_converse—that you _won 't_ be met with_vitriol—is also
possible.

~~~
nonsenselies
Pedantry_is a poor defense.

~~~
lexcorvus
"Group X tends_to do Y."

"How dishonest