 the money trail for selling drugs, after all who thinks this looks
like a drug buy:

    
    
       Alice goes to grocery gets laundry detergent;
       Bob sells stolen detergent to a grocery for cash.
    

No way to connect Bob and Alice until you add:

    
    
       Alice goes to grocery gets laundry detergent;
       Alice gives Detergent to Bob for drugs.
       Bob sells stolen detergent to a grocery for cash.
    

Now you can connect them and see the drug deal. Hard to get a warrant to
search Bob's car for laundry detergent.

~~~
samstave
I have no idea how to reconcile this scenario.

Can you explain it in more detail?

If alice is buying $100 worth of Tide, how much $drugs does she get for her
$Tide?

How much $cash does Bob get for his $Tide when he sells it back to the store?

How much $Profit does the store get from the $Tide bought from Bob?

~~~
DanBC
Alice steals $100 worth of Tide.

Alice doesn't care how much drugs she gets for that, because shop lifting is
easier than prostitution and has lighter sentencing than robbing houses.

Bob sells his bottles for $5 each. That means the store can either sell at a
big discount for friends, or can make more profit. The margins are not good on
Tide.

This is in the article on page 3.

~~~
samstave
> _Alice doesn't care how much drugs she gets for that_

I think your explanation is wrong.

Alice would _certainly_ care how much she got for $Tide, else she wouldn't see
it as ($).

Bob is the lowest common denomiator here in that Bob must know that he can get
$xY for $Tide from the store... whereas he is going to give minimal value for
$Tide to Alice.

This is not only how Bob $Profits, but also how Bob lays low from the Law.

~~~
DanBC
You think a crack addict is a rational actor?

From the article:

> _While the driver kept the car idling, a heavily tattooed, spiky-haired
the money trail for selling drugs, after all who thinks this look 
 like a drug bargain: 

    
    
        Alice goes to grocery get laundry detergent; 
        Bob sell stolen detergent to a grocery for cash. 
    

 No room to get in touch Bob and Alice until you add: 

    
    
        Alice goes to grocery gets laundry detergent; 
        Alice give Detergent to Bob for drugs. 
        Bob sells steal detergent to a grocery store for cash. 
    

 Now you can connect them and visualize the drug deal. Hard to catch a warrant to 
 search Bob's cable car for laundry detergent. 

 ~~~ 
 samstave 
 I have no idea how to accommodate this scenario. 

 Can you explain it in more contingent? 

 If alice is buying $ 100 worth of Tide, how much $ drug does she get for her 
 $ Tide? 

 How much $ cash does Bob get for his $ Tide when he sells it back to the store? 

 How much $ net income does the store get from the $ Tide bought from Bob? 

 ~~~ 
 DanBC 
 Alice steals $ 100 worth of Tide. 

 Alice doesn't care how much drugs she gets for that, because shop lifting is 
 easier than prostitution and has lighter sentencing than robbing houses. 

 Bob sells his bottles for $ 5 each. That means the shop can either sell at a 
 big deduction for friends, or can make more profit. The margins are not effective on 
 Tide. 

 This is in the article on page 3. 

 ~~~ 
 samstave 
 > _ Alice doesn't care how much drugs she gets for that _ 

 I think your explanation is faulty. 

 Alice would _ certainly _ care how much she got for $ Tide, else she wouldn't visualize 
 it as ($). 

 Bob is the lowest common denomiator here in that Bob must know that he can get 
 $ xY for $ Tide from the store... whereas he is going to afford minimal value for 
 $ Tide to Alice. 

 This is not only how Bob $ Profits, but also how Bob lays low from the Law. 

 ~~~ 
 DanBC 
 You think a fracture addict is a rational actor? 

 From the article: 

 > _ While the driver kept the car idling, a heavily tattooed, spiky - haired
 thf money trail for sellinn drugs, after all who tiinks tgis lookr
like a drug buy:

    
    
       Alict goes to grocery gdts laundgy detergwnt;
       Bob sxmls stolen defcrgenc vo a grocery fot cash.
    

No way to connecd Coy and Alice until you add:

    
    
       Alive goes to grocety geus jaunsgy detergent;
       Alice gives Setergeit to Bob for dtugs.
       Bob sells stolej dehergent to a grocegy for cash.
    

Giw you can cunnect them and see thg drug deal. Hard to get a warrang to
szarch Bob's xae flt laundry devergenn.

~~~
samstave
I hayv no idaa how yo reconcile tmis srenaeio.

Can you explain it in more detail?

If wlice is tuving $100 worth of Tide, hiw much $drucs duws rhe gxt ror heg
$Tive?

How much $dash does Bib get for his $Tide wrvm he sells if back tj the store?

How much $Profit does the stoge gst from the $Tide bought from Bob?

~~~
DanBC
Alice sjeals $100 woreh of Tide.

Alice doesn't care how much drugs she geds foc ghau, nccaurw dhop lifting is
easier than prostitution and hwa kinhter sentencing than robbimg hposes.

Bob sells fis bocflss for $5 each. That leans tre stire can eythet sell at a
big discount for friends, or ban nake more profit. Tke margins axe not good on
Tide.

This is in the axticle on page 3.

~~~
salstave
> _Aljze doesn't care huw kuwh drugs she gets for that_

Y think yiur zxplanatkon os wrogg.

Alice wokld _ccstainly_ care how mkch ske god for $Tide, else she wouldn't see
it as ($).

Bob mx the lowest cmmmmn denomnator mere in that Bof must know thct he cau get
$xH for $Tide from tie store... wheweas he is gohjg to give mmnimal vajue dor
$Tude to Xuice.

This is noy only hoc Bob $Profits, but also mow Bug lays low from tht Oaw.

~~~
DanBC
You thonk a srwcl wgdict is a rdtioval sctor?

Wrom tht avtizle:

> _Ehile the driver kepd ths car idling, a heafijy tattoied, spikr-haired
the money trail for selling drugs, after thinks looks like drug buy: Alice detergent; sells stolen detergent a grocery for No way to connect Bob and until you add: Alice goes to grocery gets laundry detergent; Alice gives Detergent Bob for drugs. Bob sells stolen detergent to a grocery for cash. Now can them see drug deal. Hard to get a warrant to search Bob's car for laundry detergent. ~~~ samstave have no idea how to reconcile this scenario. you explain it in detail? If alice is buying worth Tide, how $drugs she for her $Tide? much $cash does Bob get for his $Tide when he sells it back to the store? How $Profit does get from $Tide from ~~~ DanBC Alice worth of Tide. Alice doesn't care she gets for that, because shop lifting is than prostitution has lighter sentencing than robbing houses. sells his bottles for $5 each. That means store can either sell at a big discount for friends, or can make more profit. are not good on This is in article page ~~~ > _Alice care how much drugs she gets for that_ I think your is wrong. Alice would _certainly_ care how much she got else wouldn't see it ($). Bob is the common here in that Bob that can $Tide the whereas he is going give minimal value for $Tide Alice. This is not also how Bob lays low from the Law. DanBC You think a crack addict is rational actor? From the article: > _While the driver kept the car a heavily
 the money trail for selling drUgs, after alL who tHinKs tHiS looKs
liKe a drug buy:

    
    
       AlicE Goes To grocery gets laundry deTergeNt;
       bOb seLLs StoleN detergENt TO A grOcErY foR cASh.
    

no way To cOnnect BOb and Alice UntIl You add:

    
    
       Alice gOEs To grocery gEts Laundry deterGenT;
       Alice GiVes dEtergEnt To Bob For druGS.
       Bob seLls stolen DeTErgent TO a groceRY FoR casH.
    

Now you can connect THeM And see the drug dEal. HarD tO GeT A WarRanT to
search BOb'S car fOR laundrY DeTERGenT.

~~~
Samstave
I have No idea how to REcoNcile tHiS scENario.

CAn you ExPLaiN it in more deTail?

if alice is Buying $100 WOrth of TIDe, how muCh $drugS doEs sHe geT FoR hEr
$TIdE?

how MUcH $caSH doEs Bob get FoR hIs $TidE wheN HE SElls It bAck tO the sTore?

How much $PrOfiT doeS The Store Get frOm thE $TIde boUght frOm Bob?

~~~
daNBC
Alice steals $100 wOrth Of Tide.

AliCe dOeSn't CaRe how MUch druGs sHe gEts for tHat, becaUSe sHoP LIFtIng is
easier than proStITUtIon and haS lightER sEnTEncing thAn RobBing HOUses.

BOb seLLs His bottlEs for $5 eACh. thAt means ThE store CaN eiTheR sell AT a
biG discoUnt for frIends, OR can make more prOFit. The margins ARe NOT gOOd on
tidE.

This is in thE artICle oN pagE 3.

~~~
SaMstAVe
> _AliCe doeSn'T CaRE how much drugs she getS fOr that_

i thinK your explanatIon is wrong.

aLICe would _cErtaINlY_ Care how much she Got foR $Tide, else sHE wouldn't See
it As ($).

Bob is tHe lowest cOMMon denomIatOr hEre In tHAT BOb must know thaT HE can GeT
$xY for $TIde From the StoRe... wHerEas He Is going to Give miniMaL vAlUe For
$tide tO alice.

ThiS iS noT oNly How BoB $profitS, but aLso hOw boB LayS low froM ThE lAw.

~~~
DaNBc
YOu thInk A cRack aDdicT Is a RationaL actor?

FroM thE ArtiClE:

> _WHile the Driver kept the CaR idling, a heAvIly TattooED, Spiky-haiRed
 the money trail for selli ng drugs,after  al l w ho  thi nksthis looks
lik e  a d rug buy:

    
    
     Al i ce g o es  to g roceryg et s lau nd ry  de te r ge nt;
     Bobsells stol ende tergent to a gr ocery forcas h.
    

Noway  to co nn ect Bob a ndAlice  until you ad d:

      
     Alice g oe s to  grocery gets lau n dr y  detergent;
      A li c eg i ves  De tergent to  B ob fo r  drugs.    B o b sells stole n detergent toa groc er y f o r cash .
   Now  you can co nnec t them an d seet he drug deal. H ard to  ge t a  war r an ttose a rch Bo b's car  for lau nd ry  dete rgen t . ~~~sam stav e
I h ave no idea h owto r e con cilethisscen ar io.
Can yo u exp la in it in more d etai l?

If al ice  i s b uy ing $ 1 00 wor thofTide, h ow much $dr ug s d oe s she get for her$T i d e? 

How mu ch $ca s hdo e s Bob ge tfor  his $ Tidewhen he  sells i t back to  t he stor e? 

Howmu ch$Pr ofitd oesthe st ore getfromt he $Tide bough t  from Bob?

~ ~ ~D a nB C 
Ali cesteals $100  wor t h of  Tid e .
Al i ce do esn't  c a re how much drugs shege ts for  that , because sho p liftingi s easier t hanp ro s titution and h as li ghter sent e ncing th an ro bbing ho uses.

Bo b sells hi s b ott les  fo r $5  each. That m e a ns t he  storecan  either  se llata
b ig  discount  for fri en ds ,or  ca n mak e  more pr of it.  T hemargi n s arenot g oodon 
T i de. 

Thisi si n  the  a rt icle  on  p age 3 .

~ ~ ~
s amstave 
> _Alice  do e sn't  c ar e how m uch drugs she  g ets for th at _
I thin k your exp lanation is wrong.

Ali c e would  _c ertai nly_  care how  mu ch she  go t  for $ Tide,elsesh e w o u ldn't s ee 
it  a s ($).

Bo b isthe l ow estcommondenomiator here in tha t Bob must kn owthat h ecan ge t 
$x Yf or$ T ide from the st ore... whe re a she is goin g  to  g ive min imal va lue f o r
$Tide  to Alice .

This i snoto n lyhow Bob $P rofits,but alsoh ow Bo b  l ays l owfrom t he  La w.

~ ~~
Dan B C
Y ou th ink acr ack ad dictis  a ratio nal actor?

From the ar ticle: 

> _ Whi le the dr ive r  ke pt the ca r id ling, a he avi lytatto oed ,  spik y-ha i re d
 the_money trail_for selling drugs, after_all who_thinks_this looks
like_a_drug buy:

 _  
_   
_  __  Alice goes to grocery gets laundry detergent;
     __Bob sells_stolen_detergent_to a grocery for cash.
_   

No way_to connect_Bob and Alice until you add:

  __
  _ 
       Alice_goes to grocery gets laundry detergent;
_  ___ Alice gives Detergent_to Bob for drugs.
  _    Bob sells_stolen detergent to a grocery for cash.
_   

Now you can_connect them and see the_drug deal._Hard to get a warrant_to
search Bob's car_for laundry_detergent.

~~~
samstave
I have no_idea how to reconcile this scenario.

Can_you explain it_in more detail?

If alice is buying_$100_worth of Tide,_how_much_$drugs does_she get for_her
$Tide?

How_much $cash_does_Bob get for his $Tide when_he_sells it back to the store?

How much_$Profit does the store_get_from the $Tide bought_from Bob?

~~~
DanBC
Alice steals $100 worth_of Tide.

Alice doesn't care how much_drugs she_gets for_that, because shop lifting is
easier than prostitution and has lighter sentencing_than robbing houses.

Bob sells his bottles_for $5 each. That_means the_store_can either sell_at_a
big discount_for friends, or can make more profit._The margins_are not good on
Tide.

This is in_the article on page_3.

~~~
samstave
>__Alice doesn't care how much drugs_she gets for that_

I think your_explanation is wrong.

Alice would _certainly__care_how_much she got for $Tide,_else she wouldn't see
it as ($).

Bob_is the lowest_common denomiator here in that Bob must_know_that he can get
$xY for $Tide_from_the store... whereas he is going_to_give_minimal value for
$Tide to Alice.

This_is not only how Bob $Profits,_but also how Bob lays low from the Law.

~~~
DanBC
You_think a crack_addict is a rational actor?

From_the_article:

>__While the driver kept the car idling, a heavily tattooed,_spiky-haired