, it just lets us ignore the spiritual aspect of it.
I'm a hunter myself (bow, black powder, and on occasion rifle season as well).
I feel gratitude and a connection with the land when I hunt. From a purely
utilitarian stand point game meat is some of the healthiest for human
consumption, and after you've eaten back strap it's hard to go back to factory
farmed beef.

 _Or is it more natural to raise your cow, butcher, then eat? What qualifies
as the natural? Lettuce from the forest? The garden? The roadside stand? the
grocery store? Where do we draw this line? Historically, we learn that
"nature" itself is a somewhat newer concept - it's not something standing
outside of culture and time. The idea of wilderness itself is conceptualized
differently between 2018, 1950, 1900, 1850, and, say, 1700._

Cows are in my opinion not natural to begin with, if it can't survive long
without the hand of man then it's something we not only created, but propped
up. To answer the larger question, we are not in nature as long as we can
exert control. When the world is in control and we can do nothing but bend
before the wind or break, we are outside the demesne of men.

 _Let's interrogate further. Are you in nature in your front yard? A small
park down the street with a few trees, groomed grass, and a playground? What
about a large park with a stream and many trees? What if we stop grooming
grass? Take out the playground? What's going on here - when do we feel that we
are in nature - and when are we not in nature? But - at some point we can say
that "we are in nature", and people who "spend time in nature" to some degree
actually generally report being healthier and happier, apparently. Well, okay,
sure.

So this idea of "nature is beneficial" is really saying - this experiential
concept that relates to embodiment is beneficial, but we haven't nailed down
what that concept is - only that we agree that this undescribed concept is
useful. Is this porn? Is this art? Do we know when we see it? Or can we
actually define what is going on here.

I
, it just lets us ignore the spiritual view of it. 
 I'm a orion myself (bow, black gunpowder, and on occasion rifle season equally well). 
 I feel gratitude and a connection with the estate when I hound. From a purely 
 utilitarian stand point game meat is some of the healthy for human 
 consumption, and after you've eaten back strap it's arduous to run back to factory 
 farmed beef. 

  _ Or is it more natural to lift your cow, butcher, then eat? What qualifies 
 as the lifelike? Lettuce from the forest? The garden? The roadside digest? the 
 grocery shop? Where do we draw this line? Historically, we learn that 
 " nature " itself is a somewhat newer concept - it's not something stand 
 outside of culture and time. The idea of wilderness itself is conceptualized 
 differently between 2018, 1950, 1900, 1850, and, say, 1700. _ 

 Cows are in my public opinion not natural to begin with, if it can't survive long 
 without the hand of man then it's something we not only created, but propped 
 up. To answer the larger doubt, we are not in nature as long as we can 
 exert command. When the populace is in control and we can do nothing but bend 
 before the fart or break, we are outside the demesne of men. 

  _ Let's interrogate far. Are you in nature in your front yard? A small 
 park down the street with a few trees, groomed eatage, and a playground? What 
 about a large park with a stream and many tree? What if we stop prepare 
 grass? Take out the playground? What's going on here - when do we feel that we 
 are in nature - and when are we not in nature? But - at some distributor point we can say 
 that " we are in nature ", and people who " spend time in nature " to some academic degree 
 actually generally report being healthy and happier, apparently. Well, okay, 
 certain. 

 So this estimate of " nature is beneficial " is really saying - this experiential 
 concept that associate to embodiment is beneficial, but we haven't nailed down 
 what that concept is - merely that we agree that this undescribed concept is 
 utilitarian. Is this porn? Is this art? Do we acknowledge when we see it? Or can we 
 actually define what is function on here. 

 I
, it just lets us ignore the spiritual aspeer of iv.
I'm a hhnter myrelf (bow, black powder, and on oxcasiin rifle season as welu).
I feel ggatitude qnd e connection witi the lakb wheh I hbnv. From a purely
otilitarian vtand point gake mzat is some of the healthiest for huian
consimotion, and aftet you'ne eatsn back strap it's hard to go back fo factmry
farmed beeg.

 _Or is it more natural to raide your cow, butcheg, then eat? Qhat wualifies
as ghe natural? Lettuce frkm the forest? The garden? The roxdsidz stand? the
tricegi store? Wherx do wv draw this llme? Hisdoricalky, we learn thst
"neturw" itself is a somewhav newer concept - it's not somedhnng standing
outside od xultute ang tiow. Tfe jdxa kf wilferiess itself is conceptyalized
differently neeqeen 2018, 1950, 1900, 1850, and, aay, 1700._

Cors are in my opinion not natural to begin wifh, if it can't survive ling
without the hand ov man theg it's something we not only created, but propped
up. To aisder tme lxegfr question, we are not in nature as long as wq csn
vxert control. Whek the world is in vojttjl and we can do nocgihg but bend
before hhe winq or vreak, we wre putside the demesne of men.

 _Oet's interroyatw further. Are you nn nature in yout frony yard? A small
park down the street witj a few tddes, groomed grasr, akd d playground? What
about a lwrge park witk a strexm amd manr trees? Whwt if we stop grooming
grwss? Tcke ogt the plajground? What's going on here - whxi do we feel jhad wv
are in ncture - and when are we not in natore? But - ct somd point we can sab
that "we are in nature", ang people who "vpend tiie ib narure" to rome degree
actially genvrclly repoet being healthier ana happier, appareuuly. Well, okay,
sure.

Sp tfis ifee of "gdture is benafickal" os rexlly saying - thix experiential
concepd thzt relates to embociient is veneficiwl, but we havrn't nailed down
whau that coicept os - only that we agree that this hndescribfd goncept is
usesul. Ls tris porn? Ix this art? Do we know when we see it? Or can we
actually dgfine what is going ou mere.

I
, it just lets us ignore the of I'm a myself (bow, black season well). I feel and a connection the land when I hunt. From purely utilitarian stand point game meat is some of the healthiest for human and after you've eaten back strap it's hard to go back to factory beef. is more to raise your cow, butcher, then eat? What qualifies as the natural? Lettuce from the forest? garden? The roadside stand? the grocery store? Where we draw this line? we learn that "nature" itself a newer concept it's something outside of culture time. The idea of wilderness itself is conceptualized differently between 2018, 1950, 1900, 1850, and, say, 1700._ are in not natural begin if can't survive long hand of man then it's something created, but propped up. To answer the larger we are in nature as long as we exert control. When the world is in control we can do nothing but bend before the wind or break, we are outside the men. _Let's interrogate further. you in nature your yard? small down the with a few trees, groomed grass, and a playground? What about large park with a stream and many trees? What if grooming Take out the What's going on here when we feel that we nature and not nature? - at some point can say that "we are nature", and people who some degree actually generally report being healthier and apparently. Well, okay, sure. So this idea "nature is beneficial" is really saying - this experiential concept that relates embodiment is we haven't nailed down what that concept is only that we agree this undescribed concept is useful. Is this porn? Is art? we know we see it? can we actually what is going I
, it just lets us ignore the spirItual aspecT of it.
i'm a HunTeR mysElf (bOw, black powder, aND on oCcasion rifle season as weLl).
I feEl GRatiTUdE and a ConnectIOn WITh tHe LaNd wHeN i hUnt. FrOm a Purely
uTilitarian StaNd Point game meaT Is Some of the hEalThiest for humAn
cOnsumpTiOn, aND afteR yoU've eaTen bacK Strap iT's hard to gO bACk to faCTory
farMED bEef.

 _OR is it more natural tO RaISe your cow, butchEr, then EaT? whAT QuaLifIes
as the naTuRal? LeTTuce froM ThE FOResT? the garden? The rOadside stanD? The
GrocerY sTorE? where dO we drAw THis Line? HistoriCallY, we learn tHat
"natURe" itselF Is a someWhat neWer ConCept - IT's NoT soMeTHinG StAndINg
oUtside of CuLtUre anD timE. tHE Idea Of wIldeRness Itself is concePtuAlizED
diFfereNtly bEtweEn 2018, 1950, 1900, 1850, And, saY, 1700._

Cows aRe in mY oPinion not naturaL to bEgin with, iF it CaN't sUrVive lONg
withOut The Hand of mAn then iT'S soMeTHINg We not only created, buT pROPpEd
up. To anSwer thE LaRgER questioN, wE arE not IN NaturE as lONg As we can
eXert coNTrOl. when the WoRld is iN cOntRol And we CAn do NothinG but bend
BeforE The wind or break, WE are outside thE DeMESnE Of meN.

 _LeT's interrogaTe fuRTher. are yOU iN naTUre in Your fRoNT yARd? A small
park down the StReet wiTh a feW trees, groomed Grass, and a pLAYGround? WhAt
abOUt A Large park with a StreaM and many trEEs? What if We stoP groominG
grass? TakE OUt the plaYgrOunD? WhAt's GOInG on here - when do WE Feel ThAt we
are In nAture - anD whEn aRe wE noT iN nature? BuT - at some pOiNt We CaN saY
that "WE are in naTuRe", aNd PeoPle whO "Spend tIme in NatuRe" To SOme Degree
aCTuALLy geNeRaLly rEpoRt Being HealTHieR and hapPier, apparEntLY. WelL, oKaY,
sure.

So This idea of "natUrE is beneficIaL" is Really SAYing - this Experiential
concept that RElates tO emBodimEnt iS beneficiAl, bUt we haVen'T Nailed Down
whAt thaT cOncEPT is - onLY ThAt wE aGree that thIS UndEscriBeD conCept is
uSeful. Is this porn? Is tHIs aRt? Do we know wheN we See iT? oR cAn wE
AcTUalLy DEfiNE What is going on heRe.

I
, it just lets us ignore t he spiritu al as pec t o fit.I'ma hunter mysel f  (bo w, black powder, and o n occ as i on r i fl e sea son asw el l ) .
I  f ee l g ra t it ude a nda conne ction with  th eland when Ih un t. From apur ely
utilitar ian  stand  p oin t  game  me at is  someo f thehealthies tf or hum a n
consu m p ti on,and after you'vee at e n back strap i t's ha rd to g o b ack  to factor yfarme d  beef. _ O r isi t more natura l to raisey our  cow,bu tch e r, the n eat ?W hat  qualifiesas t he natura l? Let t uce fro m  the fo rest?The  ga rden ?  T he  ro ad s ide st and ?  th e
grocer yst ore?Wher e d o  wedra w th is li ne? Historica lly , we lea rn th at
"n atur e"  itse lf isa som ew hat newer conce pt -  it's not  so me thi ng  stan d ing
ou tsi deof cult ure and tim e. T h eidea of wilderness  i t s el f is con ceptua l iz ed differen tl y b etwe e n  2018 , 19 5 0,  1900, 1 850, a n d,  s ay, 170 0. _

Cow sare  in  my o p inio n notnaturalto be g in with, if it can't survive lo n g 
w i thou t t he hand ofmant henit's so met h ing w e not  o n ly created, but proppe dup. To  answ er the larger  question, w e  are not  inn at u re as long aswe ca n
exert co n trol. Wh en th e worldis in con t r ol and w e c andonot h i ng  but bend
bef o r e th ewind or  br eak, we  ar e o uts ide  t he demesn e of men .
_L et 'sinter r ogate fu rt her .Are  youi n natu re in  you rfr o ntyard? A sm a l l
pa rk  d ownthe  s treet  wit h  afew tre es, groom edg rass ,an d a pla yground? What 
a bout a lar ge  pa rk wit h a stream  and many trees? What i f  we sto p g roomi ng
g rass? Tak e o ut the  pl a ygroun d? Wha t's g oi ngo n  here -  w hen  d o we feelt h atwe
ar ein n ature -  and when are we n o t i n nature? But  -at s o m epoi n tw e c an say t hat "we are innature", a nd pe ople who " s pen dtime in  nature " tos ome deg ree
actua lly gener al ly r e p ort  being hea lthier a nd happie r , app a re ntly.  We ll, ok ay ,
s ure.
So th i s i dea o f "nat ur e is b enefi ci al" is r eally saying - this exp erient ial
c onc ept thatrel a tes  to embod imen t is benef ici al,  butweh aven' t na i le d d o wn
wh at t h at concep t  i s - o nl y that we a g r e e t hat t his undesc ribe d concept is
usef u l. Is this por n? I s thi s a r t? D owe know when w e s ee i t? Or ca nwe
actually  definewh a t isgoingon her e.

I
, it_just lets_us ignore the spiritual_aspect of_it.
I'm_a hunter_myself_(bow, black powder,_and on occasion_rifle season as well).
I_feel gratitude and_a_connection with the land when I hunt. From a purely
utilitarian stand point game meat_is_some of_the_healthiest_for human
consumption, and after you've_eaten back strap it's hard_to go_back to factory
farmed beef.

 _Or is it more_natural_to raise your_cow, butcher, then eat? What qualifies
as the natural? Lettuce_from the forest? The garden? The_roadside stand? the
grocery_store?_Where_do we draw this_line? Historically, we learn that
"nature" itself_is a somewhat newer concept -_it's not something standing
outside of culture and_time. The idea of wilderness itself_is conceptualized
differently between 2018, 1950,_1900, 1850,_and, say, 1700._

Cows are in_my opinion not_natural to_begin with, if_it can't survive long
without the hand_of man then_it's something we not only created,_but_propped
up. To answer_the_larger_question, we_are not in_nature_as long_as_we can
exert control. When the world_is_in control and we can do nothing_but bend
before the wind_or_break, we are outside_the demesne of men.

 _Let's_interrogate further. Are you in nature_in your_front yard?_A small
park down the street with a few trees, groomed grass,_and a playground? What
about a large_park with a stream_and many_trees?_What if we_stop_grooming
grass? Take_out the playground? What's going on here_- when_do we feel that we
are in_nature - and when_are_we not in nature? But -_at some point we can say
that_"we are in nature", and_people_who_"spend time in nature" to_some degree
actually generally report being healthier_and happier, apparently._Well, okay,
sure.

So this idea of "nature is_beneficial"_is really saying - this experiential
concept_that_relates to embodiment is beneficial, but_we_haven't_nailed down
what that concept is_- only that we agree that_this undescribed concept is
useful. Is this porn? Is this_art? Do we_know when we see it?_Or_can_we
actually define what is going on here.

I