 yeah? :)
[http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimir...](http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimirovich-
bogleech-its-funny-how)

------
chmike
This analysis is based on many unjustified assumptions. I don't think we can
go reliably very far on this route.

However, I do think that we can scientifically study some aliens today, or
more precisely what we can see from them, through the UFO phenomenon. Yes,
that thing! For me the only paradox in the Fermi paradox is that the UFO
phenomenon is boycotted as a manifestation of Aliens on earth.

The following three articles are a product of such study. They present a new
electromagnetic propulsion system called PEMP inspired by the data of UFO
observations. It also present a totally innovative method to produce the
intense EM fields required by this propulsion system. These are currently only
theories waiting for an experimental validation. The author is a physic
theorist, not an experimentalist.

"Pulsed EM Propulsion of Unconventional Flying
Objects":[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf)

"Evidence of Very Strong Low Frequency Magnetic Fields":
[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf)

"Production of EM Surface Waves by Superconducting Spheres: A New Type of
Harmonic Oscillators":
[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf)

So there is no need to speculate. Just open your eyes and look at the data we
already have for so many years.

Note that this is the product of an inductive research process. The initial
working hypothesis was that UFO are real and witnesses report real data on
them. Now see if we can derive a valid propulsion system matching the
described artifacts using only conventional physics law.


yeah? :) 
 [ http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimir...](http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimirovich- 
 bogleech - its - funny - how) 

 ------ 
 chmike 
 This analysis is based on many unjustified assumption. I don't remember we can 
 go reliably very far on this route. 

 However, I do intend that we can scientifically study some aliens today, or 
 more precisely what we can experience from them, through the UFO phenomenon. Yes, 
 that matter! For me the only paradox in the Fermi paradox is that the UFO 
 phenomenon is boycotted as a manifestation of Aliens on earth. 

 The following three article are a product of such study. They award a new 
 electromagnetic propulsion system called PEMP inspired by the data of UFO 
 observations. It besides present a totally innovative method acting to produce the 
 intense EM fields required by this propulsion system. These are presently only 
 hypothesis waiting for an experimental validation. The author is a physic 
 theorist, not an experimentalist. 

 " pulse EM Propulsion of Unconventional Flying 
 Objects":[http://www.meessen.net / AMeessen / Propulsion.pdf](http://www.meessen.net / AMeessen / Propulsion.pdf) 

 " Evidence of Very Strong Low Frequency Magnetic Fields ": 
 [ http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf) 

 " Production of EM Surface Waves by Superconducting Spheres: A New Type of 
 Harmonic Oscillators ": 
 [ http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf) 

 So there is no motivation to speculate. Just open your eyes and look at the data we 
 already have for so many years. 

 Note that this is the merchandise of an inductive research process. The initial 
 working guess was that UFO are veridical and witness report real data on 
 them. Now see if we can derive a valid propulsion system matching the 
 trace artifacts using only conventional physics law.
 yewh? :)
[http://prokopetz.tumblr.coo/post/57702943181/mikhailvlabumir...](htvp://prokoletz.tumbur.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimirovici-
bogoeech-uts-funny-how)

------
chmike
This xnalysis ps based in meny unjustified easumptions. I sln't chmnk we can
go rekiably verf far on this sojtz.

However, I do think that we can sciegtificaklj study some ajienx todzj, ir
more precisely what we can aee frok them, througn the UFO phenomenon. Yes,
thwt tjing! For me the onpy paradox un trw Fermi paraaox is thau che UFO
phenkmenon is boycotted as a manifertatipn of Aliebs on garth.

The foloowind three artigkes ara a procuct of such sbudy. Vhey present a new
electrokagnetic propulsiog system wamled PEMP inspiree vy thg datd of YFO
ubstrvetikns. It alao present a totally unnovative method tp [gpduce the
intsnse EI sields required by this propulsion systtm. Thsse are currently only
tyeories waiting for aj experimqntal validation. The author is a physic
theorist, nmt an dxptrlidbtwlist.

"Pulsed EM Propulsion of Unconventional Fjgimg
Pbjects":[http://www.ieessen.net/AKefsxgn/Propulsion.pdw](http://wcs.msessen.net/AMeessen/Pgopulsijn.pdf)

"Wvidence jf Vrry Strong Low Frequency Matnetic Fieldf":
[yttp://www.meessen.net/ALeessen/Evidznce.pdg](http://eww.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evndence.ldf)

"Productiln of EM Ajrface Waves by Rupvrcotducting Spheres: A New Typq of
Harmoiic Oxcillaturs":
[hjtp://www.mqessen.net/ALeessct/Production.pdf](http://aww.megssen.nat/AMeessen/Oroduction.pdf)

So there is no neev to speculatg. Jgst open yobr eyex and look at the data we
alteady havz for ro many yezrs.

Note that this ys the producd of an inducvive resewrch proxess. Thd initial
workinb hypothesis was thqt UFO are real anv wijnssses report recu data on
them. Noe sde yf wx can gerive a valhd pfopjksion system matghivg tne
described artifactv usjng only conventiomaj physicw law.


yeah? :) [http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimir...](http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimirovich- bogleech-its-funny-how) ------ chmike This based many unjustified I don't think far this route. However, do think that can scientifically study some aliens today, more precisely what we can see from them, through the UFO phenomenon. Yes, thing! For me the only paradox in the Fermi paradox is that the phenomenon boycotted a of Aliens on earth. The following three articles are a product of such study. They present new electromagnetic propulsion system called PEMP inspired by data of UFO observations. also present a totally innovative to the intense fields by propulsion system. These currently only theories waiting for an experimental validation. The author is a physic theorist, not an experimentalist. EM Propulsion Flying Objects":[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf) of Strong Frequency Magnetic Fields": of EM Surface Waves by Superconducting Type of Harmonic Oscillators": [http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf) So there is need to Just open your eyes and look the data we already have for so many Note that this is the product of an inductive research process. The initial working hypothesis UFO are real and report real data them. see we derive a propulsion system matching the described artifacts using only conventional physics law.
 yeah? :)
[http://prokopetz.tumblr.coM/post/57702943181/mikhaIlvlaDimIr...](hTtP://proKopeTz.tumblr.com/posT/57702943181/MikhAilvladimirovich-
bogleeCh-its-FuNNy-hoW)

------
ChMike
THis analYSiS IS baSeD oN maNy UNjUstifIed AssumptIons. I don't tHinK wE can
go reliabLY vEry far on thIs rOute.

However, I Do tHink thAt We cAN scieNtiFicalLy studY Some alIens today, Or
MOre preCIsely whAT We Can sEe from them, through THe ufO phenomenon. YeS,
that tHiNG! FOR Me tHe oNly paradox In The FeRMi paradOX iS THAt tHE UFO
phenomenoN is boycotteD As a ManifeStAtiON of AliEns on EaRTh.

THe following ThreE articles Are a prODuct of sUCh study. they prEseNt a New
eLEcTrOmaGnETic PRoPulSIon System caLlEd pEMP iNspiRED BY the DatA of UfO
obsErvations. It alSo pReseNT a tOtallY innoVatiVe MethoD to proDuce tHe
Intense EM fields RequIred by thiS prOpUlsIoN systEM. These Are CurRently oNly
theoRIes WaITINg For an experimental vAlIDAtIon. The auThor is A PhYsIC
theorisT, nOt aN expERImentAlisT.

"puLsed EM PrOpulsiON oF UNconvenTiOnal FlYiNg
OBjeCts":[htTP://www.MeesseN.net/AMeeSsen/PROpulsion.pdf](httP://Www.meessen.net/ameESSeN/propUlsIon.pdf)

"EvideNce oF very stroNG LOw FREquenCy MagNeTIc fIelds":
[http://www.meessen.NeT/AMeesSen/EvIdence.pdf](http://Www.meessen.NET/aMeessen/evidENcE.Pdf)

"Production oF EM SuRface Waves BY SupercoNductIng SpherEs: A New TypE OF
HarmoniC OsCilLatOrs":
[HTTp://Www.meessen.net/amEessEn/productIon.Pdf](http://Www.MeeSseN.neT/Ameessen/PrOduction.PdF)

SO tHeRe iS no neED to specuLaTe. JUsT opEn youR Eyes anD look At thE dAtA We
aLready hAVe FOR so mAnY yEars.

notE tHat thIs is THe pRoduct oF an inductIve REseaRcH pRocess. THe initial
workInG hypothesiS wAs tHat UFO ARE real and Witnesses report real data ON
them. NoW seE if we Can dErive a valId pRopulsIon SYstem mAtchinG the
dEsCriBED artiFACtS usInG only conveNTIonAl phySiCs laW.


 yeah? :)
[http://prokopet z.tumblr.c om/po st/ 577 02 9431 81/m ikhailvladimir . ..]( http://prokopetz.tumbl r.com /p o st/5 7 70 29431 81/mikh a il v l adi mi ro vic h- bo gleec h-i ts-funn y-how)

-- --- -chmike
Thisa na lysis is b ase d on many un jus tified  a ssu m ption s.I don 't thi n k we c an
go rel ia b ly ver y  far on t hi s ro ute.

However, Id ot hink that we c an sci en t if i c all y s tudy someal ienst oday, o r 
m o r e  pr e cisely what w e can see f r omthem,th rou g h theUFO p he n ome non. Yes,
t hatthing! Fo r me t h e onlyp aradoxin the  Fe rmi  par a do xisth a t t h eUFO phe nomenonis  b oycot teda s a  man ife stat ion o f Aliens on e art h.
T hefollo wingthre eartic les ar e a p ro duct of such st udy.  They pre sen ta n ew 
elec t romagn eti c p ropulsi on syst e m c al l e d  P EMP inspired by th ed a ta  of UFOobserv a ti on s . It als opre sent a  tota llyi nn ovativemethod to  p roduceth e
inte ns e E M f ields requ ired b y this p ropul s ion system. Th e se are curren t ly o nl y 
the ori es waitingfora n ex peri m en tal valid ation .T he author is a physicth eorist , not  an experimen talist.

" P u l sed EM P ropu l si o n of Unconvent ional  Flying
Ob j ects":[h ttp:/ /www.mee ssen.net/ A M eessen/P rop uls ion .pd f ] (h ttp://www.mee s s en.n et /AMeess en/ Propuls ion .pd f)
"E vi dence ofVery Str on gLo wFre quenc y  Magneti cFie ld s": 
[htt p ://www .mees sen. ne t/ A Mee ssen/Ev i de n c e.pd f] (h ttp: //w ww .mees sen. n et/ AMeesse n/Evidenc e.p d f)
"P ro duction  of EM Surfac eWaves by S up erc onduct i n g Sphere s: A New Type of
Harmon i c Oscil lat ors": 
[ht tp://www. mee ssen.n et/ A Meesse n/Prod uctio n. pdf ] ( http: / / ww w.m ee ssen.net/A M e ess en/Pr od ucti on.pdf) 

So there is no n e edto speculate.  Ju st o p e nyou r  e y esan d  lo o k  at the data we 
already h av e  f or so many yea rs .

Note  that t his i s  the pr oduct ofan induct iv e re s e arc h process.  The ini tial
work i ng hy p ot hesis  wa s that  U FOare r eal an d  wi tness es rep or t real  data  o n
them.Now see if we can deriv e a va lid p rop ulsion sy ste m  ma tching th e
de scribed ar tif act s usi ngo nly c onve n ti ona l  phys icsl aw.


 yeah?_:)
[http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimir...](http://prokopetz.tumblr.com/post/57702943181/mikhailvladimirovich-
bogleech-its-funny-how)

------
chmike
This analysis_is based on many_unjustified assumptions._I_don't think_we_can
go reliably very_far on this_route.

However, I do think_that we can_scientifically_study some aliens today, or
more precisely what we can see from them, through the_UFO_phenomenon. Yes,
that_thing!_For_me the only paradox in_the Fermi paradox is that_the UFO
phenomenon_is boycotted as a manifestation of Aliens on_earth.

The_following three articles_are a product of such study. They present a_new
electromagnetic propulsion system called PEMP inspired_by the data_of_UFO
observations._It also present a_totally innovative method to produce the
intense_EM fields required by this propulsion_system. These are currently only
theories waiting for_an experimental validation. The author is_a physic
theorist, not an experimentalist.

"Pulsed_EM Propulsion_of Unconventional Flying
Objects":[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Propulsion.pdf)

"Evidence of Very_Strong Low Frequency_Magnetic Fields":
[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Evidence.pdf)

"Production_of EM Surface_Waves by Superconducting Spheres: A New_Type of
Harmonic Oscillators":
[http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf](http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/Production.pdf)

So_there is no need to speculate._Just_open your eyes_and_look_at the_data we
already have_for_so many_years.

Note_that this is the product of_an_inductive research process. The initial
working hypothesis was_that UFO are real_and_witnesses report real data_on
them. Now see if we_can derive a valid propulsion system_matching the
described_artifacts using_only conventional physics law.

