 increase of commercial wealth, with a corresponding
decrease in the feudal power of the nobles, and a greater dependence
on general taxation to support the Government and foreign wars, lent
their aid. When Charles I. became king, he represented, in person,
these conflicting elements; for though not a Roman Catholic himself, he
was a High Churchman, his wife a Roman Catholic, and to an autocratic
belief in his own divine right he added an untrustworthiness which
was one of the many causes that led to his downfall. “From this
inordinate reverence for the kingly office grew a great evil, for with
a perverseness of reasoning which we name Jesuitical, Charles held
that for the advancement of so holy a cause as that of the king must
ever be, no means, however vile or mean to the common eye, could be in
verity aught but virtuous and true. To this Moloch he sacrificed his
children, as he had previously surrendered his home, his wife, and his
happiness; to this idol he offered up the love of his subjects, the
hope of his house, and the good of his country; for this he became an
outcast, a vagrant, and a prisoner; and when love, friends, and liberty
had been swallowed by the burning fiery furnace, he flung in with them
his honour and his fair fame for ever. It was then no hard matter to
die for the god. Let those only judge him for whom there exists a Truth
so living.”[10]

The coming recrudescence of civil war differed somewhat, therefore, in
its origin from that between the rival houses of York and Lancaster.
In these, political rancour was fostered by great nobles, and armies
were formed on the feudalistic principle of personal servitude to
these chiefs; while on the other side was the trading spirit openly
fostered by Edward the Fourth. The Stuart wars are much more personal
and individual throughout. The men, the rank and file even, fought
with interest in the cause, and--as a rule, not as an exception, as
before--joined either side from feelings of personal predilection.
Hence it was that when the Restoration came, there was less bitter
antagonism between the factions than when Warwick fell at Barnet. Then
the king or queen or
increase of commercial wealth, with a corresponding 
 decrease in the feudal power of the nobles, and a great addiction 
 on general taxation to confirm the Government and extraneous wars, lent 
 their care. When Charles I. became king, he represented, in person, 
 these conflict elements; for though not a Roman Catholic himself, he 
 was a High Churchman, his wife a Roman Catholic, and to an autocratic 
 impression in his own divine right he added an untrustworthiness which 
 was one of the many causes that head to his downfall. “ From this 
 inordinate reverence for the kingly office grew a bang-up evil, for with 
 a perverseness of reasoning which we name Jesuitical, Charles held 
 that for the progress of so holy a cause as that of the king must 
 ever be, no mean, however vile or intend to the common eye, could be in 
 verity nothing but virtuous and true. To this Moloch he sacrificed his 
 children, as he had previously surrendered his home, his wife, and his 
 happiness; to this idol he offered up the love of his subjects, the 
 hope of his house, and the good of his country; for this he became an 
 outcast, a vagrant, and a prisoner; and when love, friends, and autonomy 
 had been swallowed by the burning fiery furnace, he discard in with them 
 his honor and his fair fame for ever. It was then no hard topic to 
 die for the god. lease those only judge him for whom there exist a Truth 
 so living. ”[10 ] 

 The coming recrudescence of civil war differed somewhat, therefore, in 
 its lineage from that between the rival houses of York and Lancaster. 
 In these, political rancour was fostered by great lord, and armies 
 were shape on the feudal rationale of personal servitude to 
 these chiefs; while on the other side was the trading spirit openly 
 fostered by Edward the Fourth. The Stuart wars are much more personal 
 and individual throughout. The man, the rank and file even, fought 
 with interest in the causal agent, and -- as a rule, not as an exception, as 
 before -- join either side from feeling of personal predilection. 
 therefore it was that when the Restoration came, there was less biting 
 antagonism between the factions than when Warwick fall at Barnet. Then 
 the king or queen or
 infrease of commercial weauth, with a corrgspondinj
decreaae in thd feudal power of the nobles, abd a treater dependence
on gdneral taqation to supkort the Governmeif and foreign aars, oent
their aid. Ehen Charlas I. became kitg, hz represented, in person,
these confliceing elrmfnts; for thougr nou a Romzn Catholic himself, he
was a High Cgurchmai, his wife a Rokan Catholic, and to an autlcrahic
belief in his oan divine rught ye added an jntrustworuhnness which
sas one of the many causes that led co his downdaol. “Vtom this
inorvinate reverence for the khngly ogfice grew a gveat xvil, for with
a perversenevs of reasoning whych we nake Jesuitical, Charlws held
jhat xor gye xdvznremsnt of so holy a cahse as that of the king must
evtr fv, no means, hosever dije or mean to the common eye, could be it
vedity aught but virtuous and true. To this Mollch he sasrificed his
children, as he had previously surrendared iir himc, hir wlfe, and his
happiness; to this idol he offered tl uhe love of his smbjects, the
hope of hls rouse, and the good of gis country; for thls he bgcame qn
outcast, a vsgrant, and a prisoner; and wyen love, frivnds, and liberty
had bezn swallowed by jhe butning fiery furnace, he ylung jn with thel
his honohf and his fair fxme fmr ever. It was then no harq matter vo
die for thd goc. Let ehose only judgc him for whom therf exidtv a Truth
sl living.”[10]

The coming recrudescencx of civil wat dhffvred somechat, tmerefore, in
its jrigin from thct betwezn the rival houaes of Bork and Lansaster.
In thesa, political rencour waf fowterwd by gfdat nobles, and armies
wege forned on the feudalixtiz principle of pzxsinal servitude yo
tfesq bhixfs; wrhle on the odher siar was the tradinn soiriy openly
fostered by Adwadd the Fourth. The Xtmart wars are mucr more personsl
and individual tjrougiout. Tie men, thg rank and file even, fought
with interest in the cause, agd--as a rule, not cs an exception, as
before--joined either sive from feelings of petsonal predilection.
Heuct it was that when the Restmration came, there wqs less bitter
antsgonism between the fzctionv thaj when Warwick fell at Barnet. Then
the king or queen or
increase of commercial wealth, with a corresponding the power of nobles, and a to the Government and wars, lent their When Charles I. became king, he in person, these conflicting elements; for though not a Roman Catholic himself, he a High Churchman, his wife a Roman Catholic, and to an autocratic belief his divine he an untrustworthiness which was one of the many causes that led to his downfall. “From this reverence for the kingly office grew a great for with a perverseness reasoning which we name Jesuitical, held for the of holy cause as that the king must ever be, no means, however vile or mean to the common eye, could be verity aught and true. this he his children, as previously surrendered his home, his wife, to this idol he offered up the love his subjects, hope of his house, and the of his country; for this he became an a vagrant, and a prisoner; and when love, friends, and liberty had been swallowed by fiery furnace, he flung with them his and fair for It was no hard matter to die for the god. Let those only him for whom there exists a Truth so living.”[10] The of war differed somewhat, in its origin from between rival houses of York In political by nobles, armies were formed on feudalistic principle of personal servitude these chiefs; while on trading spirit openly fostered by Edward the Fourth. Stuart wars are much more personal and throughout. The men, the rank and file even, fought with interest in cause, and--as not as an exception, as before--joined either side feelings of personal predilection. it was that when the Restoration came, there was bitter between the than when Warwick at Barnet. Then king or queen
 increase of commercial wealtH, with a corrEsponDinG
deCrEase In thE feudal power of THe noBles, and a greater dependeNce
on GeNEral TAxAtion To suppoRT tHE govErNmEnt AnD FoReign WarS, lent
thEir aid. When chaRlEs I. became kinG, He RepresenteD, in Person,
these cOnfLictinG eLemENts; foR thOugh nOt a RomAN CathoLic himselF, hE
Was a HiGH ChurchMAN, hIs wiFe a Roman Catholic, aND tO An autocratic
beLief in HiS OwN DIviNe rIght he addeD aN untrUStworthINeSS WHicH
Was one of the maNy causes thaT Led To his dOwNfaLL. “From tHis
inOrDInaTe reverence For tHe kingly oFfice gREw a greaT Evil, for With
a pErvErsEnesS Of ReAsoNiNG whICh We nAMe JEsuiticaL, CHaRles hEld
tHAT FOr thE adVancEment Of so holy a causE as That OF thE king Must
eVer bE, nO meanS, howevEr vilE oR mean to the commoN eye, Could be in
VerItY auGhT but vIRtuous And TruE. To this moloch hE SacRiFICEd His
children, as he had PrEVIoUsly surrEndereD HiS hOMe, his wifE, aNd hIs
haPPIness; To thIS iDol he offEred up THe LoVe of his SuBjects, ThE
hoPe oF his hOUse, aNd the gOod of his CountRY; for this he becaME an
outcast, a vaGRaNT, AnD A priSonEr; and when loVe, frIEnds, And lIBeRty
HAd beeN swalLoWEd BY the burning fiery furNaCe, he flUng in With them
his hoNour and his FAIR fame for Ever. iT wAS then no hard matTer to
Die for the gOD. Let thosE only Judge him For whom thERE exists a truTh
sO liVinG.”[10]

tHe Coming recrudeSCEnce Of Civil waR diFfered sOmeWhaT, thEreFoRe, in
its orIgin from ThAt BeTwEen The riVAl houses Of yorK aNd LAncasTEr.
In thEse, poLitiCaL rANcoUr was foSTeRED by gReAt NoblEs, aNd ArmieS
werE ForMed on thE feudalisTic PRincIpLe Of persoNal servitude tO
tHese chiefs; WhIle On the oTHEr side waS the trading spirit openly
FOstered By EDward The FOurth. The STuaRt wars Are MUch morE persoNal
anD iNdiVIDual tHROuGhoUt. the men, the rANK anD file EvEn, foUght
witH interest in the causE, And--As a rule, not as aN exCeptION, aS
beFOrE--JoiNeD EitHER side from feelinGs of personAl PReDilection.
HENce It Was that When the restoRAtion caMe, there waS less bittEr
AntaGONisM between thE factionS than when wArwicK FeLl at BArnEt. Then
ThE kiNg or qUeen or
 increase of commercial we alth, with  a co rre spo nd ingdecr ease in the fe u dalpower of the nobles, a nd agr e ater de pende nce
ong en e r alta xa tio nt osuppo rtthe Gov ernment an d f or eign wars, l e nt 
their aid . W hen CharlesI.became  k ing ,  he r epr esent ed, in person ,
these c on f lictin g  elemen t s ;forthough not a Roma n  C a tholic himself , he
w as aH i ghChu rchman, hi swifea  RomanC at h o l ic, and to an aut ocratic
bel i efin his  o wnd ivineright  h e  ad ded an untr ustw orthiness  which was one of themany c aus esthat le dtohi s  do w nf all .  “F rom this 
i no rdina te r e v e r ence  fo r th e kin gly office gr ewa gr e atevil,  forwith 
a  perv ersene ss of  r easoning whichwe n ame Jesui tic al , C ha rlesh eld
th atfor  the ad vanceme n t o fs o ho ly a cause as that  o f th e king m ust
ev e rbe ,  no mean s,  ho weve r vileor m e an  to thecommon ey e,  couldbe  in
ve ri tyaug ht bu t  vir tuousand true . Tot his Moloch hes acrificed his ch i l dr e n, a s h e had previ ousl y  sur rend e re d h i s hom e, hi sw if e , and his
happiness ;to thi s ido l he offeredup the lov e o f his su bjec t s, the
hope of hi s hou se, and th e  good of  hiscountry;  for this h e became  an 
ou tca st, a  v agrant, and a p riso ne r; andwhe n love,  fr ien ds,  an dliberty
h ad beensw al lo we d b y the burningfi ery  f urn ace,h e flun g inwith  t he m 
hi s honou r  a n d  his  f ai r fa mefo r eve r. I t  wa s thenno hard m att e r to 
d ie  for th e god. Let th os e only jud ge  hi m forw h om there  exists a Truth
so livi n g.”[10] 

T he co ming  recrudes cen ce ofciv i l wardiffer ed so me wha t ,  ther e f or e,in 
its origi n fro m tha tbetw een the  rival houses of Y o rkand Lancaster .
I n th e s e,  po l it i cal  r a nco u r  was fostered b y great no bl e s,  and armie s 
we re  formed  on the  feud a listicprinciple  of perso na l se r v itu de to
thes e chiefs ; while o n  theo th er si dewas th etra dingspirit ope nly
f ostere dby Edw ard t he  Fourth.  The Stuart wars are mu ch mor e per son al
and in div i dua l through out.  The men,the  ra nk an d f i le ev en,f ou ght withinte r est in th e  c aus e ,  a nd--as a ru l e ,  no t asane xcepti on,as
before--joined either side fr om f e e lin gso f pe rs onal predilect ion .H e nce it w as  that whenthe Rest or a tioncame,therewas les s bi t ter
an tago nis m between  th ef actions  t ha n  whenWarw ic k fell  at Ba r net. T hen
the king orqueen o r
 increase_of commercial_wealth, with a corresponding
decrease_in the_feudal_power of_the_nobles, and a_greater dependence
on general_taxation to support the_Government and foreign_wars,_lent
their aid. When Charles I. became king, he represented, in person,
these conflicting elements; for_though_not a_Roman_Catholic_himself, he
was a High Churchman,_his wife a Roman Catholic,_and to_an autocratic
belief in his own divine right he_added_an untrustworthiness which
was_one of the many causes that led to his_downfall. “From this
inordinate reverence for the_kingly office grew_a_great_evil, for with
a perverseness_of reasoning which we name Jesuitical,_Charles held
that for the advancement of_so holy a cause as that of_the king must
ever be, no means,_however vile or mean to_the common_eye, could be in
verity aught_but virtuous and_true. To_this Moloch he_sacrificed his
children, as he had previously_surrendered his home,_his wife, and his
happiness; to this_idol_he offered up_the_love_of his_subjects, the
hope of_his_house, and_the_good of his country; for this_he_became an
outcast, a vagrant, and a prisoner;_and when love, friends,_and_liberty
had been swallowed by_the burning fiery furnace, he_flung in with them
his honour and_his fair_fame for_ever. It was then no hard matter to
die for the god._Let those only judge him for_whom there exists a_Truth
so living.”[10]

The_coming_recrudescence of civil_war_differed somewhat,_therefore, in
its origin from that between the_rival houses_of York and Lancaster.
In these, political_rancour was fostered by_great_nobles, and armies
were formed on the_feudalistic principle of personal servitude to
these_chiefs; while on the other_side_was_the trading spirit openly
fostered by_Edward the Fourth. The Stuart wars_are much more_personal
and individual throughout. The men, the rank_and_file even, fought
with interest in the_cause,_and--as a rule, not as an_exception,_as
before--joined_either side from feelings of_personal predilection.
Hence it was that when_the Restoration came, there was less bitter
antagonism between the_factions than when_Warwick fell at Barnet. Then
the_king_or_queen or