 been duly
considered by providing the said little hands with a larger hitting
surface, a longer range, and four ounces extra weight.

In short, then, what has happened has been the virtual legalization of
prizefighting under cover of the boxing glove. And this is exactly what
public opinion desires. We do not like fighting; but we like looking on
at fights: therefore we require a law which will punish the prizefighter
if he hits us, and secure us the protection of the police whilst we sit
in a comfortable hall and watch him hitting another prizefighter. And
that is just the law we have got at present.

Thus Cashel Byron's plea for a share of the legal toleration accorded to
the vivisector has been virtually granted since he made it. The
legalization of cruelty to domestic animals under cover of the
anesthetic is only the extreme instance of the same social phenomenon as
the legalization of prizefighting under cover of the boxing glove. The
same passion explains the fascination of both practices; and in both,
the professors--pugilists and physiologists alike--have to persuade the
Home Office that their pursuits are painless and beneficial. But there
is also between them the remarkable difference that the pugilist, who
has to suffer as much as he inflicts, wants his work to be as painless
and harmless as possible whilst persuading the public that it is
thrillingly dangerous and destructive, whilst the vivisector wants to
enjoy a total exemption from humane restrictions in his laboratory
whilst persuading the public that pain is unknown there. Consequently
the vivisector is not only crueller than the prizefighter, but, through
the pressure of public opinion, a much more resolute and uncompromising
liar. For this no one but a Pharisee will single him out for special
blame. All public men lie, as a matter of good taste, on subjects which
are considered serious (in England a serious occasion means simply an
occasion on which nobody tells the truth); and however illogical or
capricious the point of honor may be in man, it is too absurd to assume
that the doctors who, from among innumerable methods of research,
select that of tormenting animals hideously, will hesitate to come on a
platform and tell a soothing fib
been duly 
 considered by providing the said short hand with a larger hitting 
 surface, a long range, and four ounces excess weight. 

 In short, then, what has happened has been the virtual legalization of 
 prizefight under binding of the boxing boxing glove. And this is exactly what 
 public opinion desire. We do not wish fighting; but we like looking on 
 at competitiveness: therefore we require a jurisprudence which will punish the prizefighter 
 if he hits us, and secure us the protection of the police whilst we baby-sit 
 in a comfortable hall and watch him hitting another prizefighter. And 
 that is just the jurisprudence we have got at present. 

 Thus Cashel Byron's plea for a share of the legal toleration accorded to 
 the vivisector has been about granted since he made it. The 
 legalization of cruelty to domestic animals under cover of the 
 anesthetic is only the extreme instance of the like social phenomenon as 
 the legalization of prizefight under top of the boxing glove. The 
 same passion explains the fascination of both practice; and in both, 
 the professor -- pugilists and physiologists alike -- receive to carry the 
 Home Office that their pastime are painless and beneficial. But there 
 is also between them the remarkable remainder that the pugilist, who 
 has to suffer as a lot as he inflicts, wants his work to be as painless 
 and harmless as possible whilst persuading the public that it is 
 thrillingly dangerous and destructive, whilst the vivisector wants to 
 enjoy a total exemption from humane restrictions in his lab 
 whilst persuading the populace that annoyance is strange there. Consequently 
 the vivisector is not only crueller than the prizefighter, but, through 
 the pressure of public opinion, a a lot more resolute and uncompromising 
 liar. For this no one but a Pharisee will single him out for special 
 blame. All public men lie, as a matter of good taste, on subjects which 
 are consider serious (in England a serious occasion means simply an 
 juncture on which nobody tells the accuracy); and however illogical or 
 capricious the point of award may be in man, it is too absurd to assume 
 that the doctors who, from among innumerable method acting of research, 
 select that of tormenting animals hideously, will hesitate to come on a 
 platform and tell a soothing fib
 befn duly
considered by proyiding the said little iands wjth a lafger hitting
surface, a longer rqnge, qnd four ounces extra deight.

In dhort, thwn, wiat has happened has beek the yirtucl legalization pf
prizefigvting under coeef lf the boxing glove. And this is exastly whst
oublic opinion desprqs. Ws do not like fighting; but we like lookinj on
at fights: tnerefore we require a law ahicj will punish the orizefightet
jf rw hits us, ana secure us the protecjion of the police whilst we sit
kn a eomfortable hqll dnd watch hmm hitning another igizefigvter. Anc
that is just bhe lew ww have got at present.

Vhus Cashel Byron's pjea for a skare of the legal tolwrqtion accmrdea to
ghe vmviaector haa been virfually granred since he made iu. Trv
kegalization of crtejty to domestic animals under cover of uhe
anssthetic is only the exrreme instance of the same socyal phenomenon as
the legalization of prizefightinc undxr corcv of rhf boxing glove. The
same passion explains the fwaconstion of both iractices; and in bptj,
tng professors--pueilists ahd physiologists apike--havg to pwrsuade tre
Hoke Office that their pursuirs are painlvss qnd beneficial. But there
is alro bgtween them the remarkable diyferende that the pugilist, dho
has to suffer as mgch as ht inflicts, wants hys work ti be as paivlesx
and hwrmless as possltle whilst persuadlng tke putlic that lt is
thrillingly dangerous and vxstructive, wholvt nhe viviszctor eants to
enjoy a total exempjion from humave restricnions in iis laboratowy
whilst persgwding the puulic that paib is unknowv there. Consequrntly
the nirisector us not only cruellcr thxh the prizefighctr, vut, through
the lrersuwe oh pubjhc opinion, a mucf mute rerolute and mncumprpmising
liar. For this no kne but a Pharisee wlll singlg him out for special
bkame. All public mej lie, as a maytet of good taste, on subjects whidh
are condidcred serious (yn Ekglagd a seriobs occasion means simply an
occasion on wiich nobody tells the jruth); and however illpnical or
caprmcious the poind of honor may be in man, it is too abxurd to assume
that ths doctmrs wjo, from among innumerable methods of research,
select that of tormenting anumals iiqeously, wilm hexitatv tj come jn a
'letform and tell a soothing fib
been duly considered by providing the said with larger hitting a longer range, In then, what has has been the legalization of prizefighting under cover of boxing glove. And this is exactly what public opinion desires. We do not fighting; but we like looking on at fights: therefore we require a law will the if hits us, and secure us the protection of the police whilst we sit in a comfortable and watch him hitting another prizefighter. And that just the law we got at present. Thus Cashel plea a share the toleration to the vivisector been virtually granted since he made it. The legalization of cruelty to domestic animals under cover of anesthetic is extreme instance the social as the legalization under cover of the boxing glove. explains the fascination of both practices; and in the professors--pugilists physiologists alike--have to persuade the Home that their pursuits are painless and beneficial. But is also between them the remarkable difference that the pugilist, who has to suffer as he inflicts, wants his to be as and as whilst the public it is thrillingly dangerous and destructive, whilst the vivisector wants to a total exemption from humane restrictions in his laboratory whilst public pain is unknown Consequently the vivisector is only than the prizefighter, but, pressure public more and liar. For this no but a Pharisee will single out for special blame. a matter of good taste, on subjects which considered serious (in England a serious occasion simply an occasion on which nobody tells the truth); and however illogical capricious the honor may be in man, it is too to assume that the who, from among innumerable methods of research, select that tormenting hideously, will to come on platform and tell soothing fib
 been duly
considered by proviDing the saiD littLe hAndS wIth a LargEr hitting
surfaCE, a loNger range, and four ounces Extra WeIGht.

IN ShOrt, thEn, what hAS hAPPenEd HaS beEn THe VirtuAl lEgalizaTion of
prizEfiGhTing under covER oF the boxing GloVe. And this is eXacTly whaT
pUblIC opinIon DesirEs. We do NOt like Fighting; bUt WE like lOOking on
AT FiGhts: Therefore we requirE A lAW which will puniSh the pRiZEfIGHteR
if He hits us, anD sEcure US the proTEcTION of THe police whilsT we sit
in a coMForTable hAlL anD Watch hIm hitTiNG anOther prizefIghtEr. And
that Is just THe law we HAve got aT preseNt.

THus cashEL BYrOn's PlEA foR A sHarE Of tHe legal tOlErAtion AccoRDED To
thE viViseCtor hAs been virtualLy gRantED siNce he Made iT. The
LeGalizAtion oF crueLtY to domestic animAls uNder cover Of tHe
AneStHetic IS only tHe eXtrEme instAnce of tHE saMe SOCIaL phenomenon as
the leGaLIZaTion of prIzefigHTiNg UNder coveR oF thE boxING glovE. The
SAmE passion ExplaiNS tHe FascinaTiOn of boTh PraCtiCes; anD In boTh,
the pRofessorS--pugiLIsts and physiolOGists alike--havE To PERsUAde tHe
HOme Office thAt thEIr puRsuiTS aRe pAInlesS and bEnEFiCIal. But there
is also beTwEen theM the rEmarkable diffErence that THE Pugilist, Who
hAS tO Suffer as much as He infLicts, wants HIs work to Be as pAinless
aNd harmlesS AS possiblE whIlsT peRsuADInG the public thaT IT is
tHrIllinglY daNgerous And DesTruCtiVe, Whilst the VivisectOr WaNtS tO
enJoy a tOTal exempTiOn fRoM huMane rEStrictIons iN his LaBoRAtoRy
whilsT PeRSUadiNg ThE pubLic ThAt paiN is uNKnoWn there. consequenTly
THe viViSeCtor is nOt only cruelleR tHan the prizEfIghTer, but, THRough
the Pressure of public opinion, A Much morE reSolutE and UncompromIsiNg
liar. for THis no oNe but a phariSeE wiLL SinglE HIm Out FoR special
blAME. AlL publIc Men lIe, as a maTter of good taste, on sUBjeCts which
are coNsiDereD SErIouS (In eNglAnD A seRIOus occasion meanS simply an
oCcASiOn on which nOBodY tElls the Truth); anD howeVEr illogIcal or
capRicious thE pOint OF HonOr may be in mAn, it is toO absurd to ASsume
THaT the dOctOrs who, FrOm aMong iNnumerABle MethoDs of reSeArch,
seLect tHaT of tormeNting animals hideously, wiLl hesiTate tO coMe on a
platForM And Tell a sootHing Fib
 been duly
considered by p roviding t he sa idlit tl e ha ndswith a largerh itti ng
surface, a longer r ange,  a n d fo u rounce s extra we i g ht. 
In  sh or t ,then,  wh at hashappened h asbe en the virtu a llegalizati onof
prizefigh tin g unde rcov e r ofthe  boxi ng glo v e. And  this isex a ctly w h at
publ i c  o pini on desires. We do no t  like fighting ; butwe li k e  lo oki ng on
at f ig hts:t herefor e  w e r equ i re a law whic h will puni s h t he pri ze fig h ter
if  he h it s  us , and secur e us  the prot ection of thep olice w hilstwesit 
ina  c om for ta b leh al l a n d w atch him  h it tinganot h e r priz efi ghte r. An d
that is jus t t he l a w w e hav e got  atpr esent .

Thu s Cas he l Byron's pleafora share o f t he  le ga l tol e ration  ac cor ded tothe viv i sec to r h as  been virtually gr an t e dsince he  madei t.  T h e
legali za tio n of c ruelt y to do mestic a nimals un de r cover  o f thean est het ic is only  the e xtreme i nstan c e of the sames ocial phenome n on a st he l ega lization of  pri z efig htin g  u nde r  cove r ofth e  b o xing glove. The
sam epassio n exp lains the fas cination o f b oth prac tice s ;a nd in both,
th e pro fessors--p u gilistsand p hysiolog ists alik e - -have to  pe rsu ade  th e Ho me Office tha t thei rpursuit s a re pain les s a ndben ef icial. Bu t thereis  a ls obet weent hem there mar ka ble  diff e rencethatthepu gi l ist , who
h a st o  suf fe ras m uch  a s heinfl i cts , wants  his work  to be a spa inlessand harmlessas  possiblewh ils t pers u a ding the  public that it is
thri l linglydan gerou s an d destruc tiv e, whi lst the vi visect or wa nt s t o enjoy a  t ota lexemptionf r omhuman erest riction s in his laborator y 
wh ilst persuadi ngthep u bl ict ha t  pa in isu n known there. Co nsequently 
t h evivisector isno t onlycruelle r tha n  the pr izefighte r, but, t hr ough t hepressure o f public  opinion, a muc h  m ore r eso lute a nd  un compr omisin g 
li ar. F or thi sno one  butaPharisee  will single him out fo r spec ial
b lam e. All pu bli c  me n lie, as  a m atter of g ood  ta ste,ons ubjec ts w h ic h
a r e con side r ed seriou s  ( inE n gl and a serio u s occ asion  me a ns sim plyan
occasion on wh i ch nobody tell s th e tru th) ;  and  h owever illogic alor c apriciou sthe point o f honorma y  be i n man,  it is  too ab s u rd to ass umetha t the doc tor sw ho, fro mam o ng inn umer ab le met hods o f  res e a rch,
select that  of t o r menti n g a nimal shideous l y, w ill hesita te to comeon a
p latf orm a nd tell  a  sooth ing  f ib
 been_duly
considered by_providing the said little_hands with_a_larger hitting
surface,_a_longer range, and_four ounces extra_weight.

In short, then, what_has happened has_been_the virtual legalization of
prizefighting under cover of the boxing glove. And this is exactly_what
public_opinion desires._We_do_not like fighting; but we_like looking on
at fights: therefore_we require_a law which will punish the prizefighter
if he_hits_us, and secure_us the protection of the police whilst we sit
in_a comfortable hall and watch him_hitting another prizefighter._And
that_is_just the law we_have got at present.

Thus Cashel Byron's_plea for a share of the_legal toleration accorded to
the vivisector has been_virtually granted since he made it._The
legalization of cruelty to domestic_animals under_cover of the
anesthetic is only_the extreme instance_of the_same social phenomenon_as
the legalization of prizefighting under cover_of the boxing_glove. The
same passion explains the fascination_of_both practices; and_in_both,
the_professors--pugilists and_physiologists alike--have to_persuade_the
Home Office_that_their pursuits are painless and beneficial._But_there
is also between them the remarkable difference_that the pugilist, who
has_to_suffer as much as_he inflicts, wants his work_to be as painless
and harmless as_possible whilst_persuading the_public that it is
thrillingly dangerous and destructive, whilst the vivisector wants_to
enjoy a total exemption from humane_restrictions in his laboratory
whilst_persuading the_public_that pain is_unknown_there. Consequently
the_vivisector is not only crueller than the_prizefighter, but,_through
the pressure of public opinion, a_much more resolute and_uncompromising
liar._For this no one but a_Pharisee will single him out for_special
blame. All public men lie,_as_a_matter of good taste, on_subjects which
are considered serious (in England_a serious occasion_means simply an
occasion on which nobody tells_the_truth); and however illogical or
capricious the_point_of honor may be in man,_it_is_too absurd to assume
that the_doctors who, from among innumerable methods_of research,
select that of tormenting animals hideously, will hesitate_to come on_a
platform and tell a soothing_fib