to remain unmarried were equally firm. There came a drought which
threatened the world with famine. In their distress, people applied to
her, and she gave corn from her stock, and the supply seemed to be
endless. Her goodness was unbounded. One day, as she was lying asleep
with her body exposed, a drop of rain fell on her stomach, which
produced conception. A son was the issue, the founder of a new race
which built all these houses'.... The houses of the people (the
agricultural or sedentary Pimos) are mere sheds, thatched with willow
and corn stalks" (n. 85.)

This report is more rational than the other in so far as it represents
the multitudinous houses of stone or adobe as being reared by a "race"
rather than by a "boy"! But, of course, the "son" could not have been
the "founder" of his mother or of her ancestors. It is further apparent
that the infant could not have been either the builder or inventor of
the house or stronghold in which he was born.

Of course it is an impossibility to get at the exact truth in relation
to the mysterious birth. The unwedded lady's own account ought to
constitute a sufficient explanation, and would--but for the unfortunate
historic fact that no mother has ever been known to tell her children
the truth about their production. Even Christian mothers lie precisely
like Pagans in this respect, and are just as thorough-going humbugs as
Hannah in the temple, when questioned for details. They will tell a poor
helpless, green, inquiring child, for instance, that they found him in a
cabbage, when the actual truth is that they got him from a stork. We
therefore unanimously dismiss their worse than useless testimony as that
of a shameless pack of preposterous deluderers.

It is probable that the Pimo princess may have been secretly wedded or
united to some man whom she really loved and preferred to all others.
Yet an open avowal of such preference might have caused his death or
might have turned the love of rival suitors into hate and brought about
the ruin of the already sufficiently perplexed and troubled nation.

But would not the birth of the infant have revealed all?

Certainly, but in the present instance
to remain unmarried were equally firm. There came a drought which 
 threaten the populace with famine. In their distress, people applied to 
 her, and she yield corn from her stock, and the provision seemed to be 
 endless. Her goodness was boundless. One sidereal day, as she was lying asleep 
 with her body expose, a drop of rain fell on her stomach, which 
 produced conception. A son was the issue, the laminitis of a new race 
 which built all these firm'.... The houses of the people (the 
 agrarian or sedentary Pimos) are mere shed, thatched with willow 
 and corn stalks " (n. 85 .) 

 This report is more rational than the other in therefore far as it represents 
 the multitudinous houses of stone or adobe as being reared by a " race " 
 rather than by a " boy "! But, of course, the " son " could not have been 
 the " founder " of his mother or of her ancestors. It is further apparent 
 that the infant could not have been either the builder or inventor of 
 the house or stronghold in which he was born. 

 Of course it is an impossibility to get at the accurate accuracy in relation 
 to the mysterious birth. The unwed dame's own account ought to 
 constitute a sufficient explanation, and would -- but for the unfortunate 
 historic fact that no mother has ever been known to tell her children 
 the truth about their product. Even Christian mothers lie precisely 
 like Pagans in this respect, and are just as thorough - going humbug as 
 Hannah in the temple, when questioned for details. They will tell a hapless 
 helpless, green, ask child, for instance, that they found him in a 
 cabbage, when the actual truth is that they got him from a stork. We 
 consequently unanimously dismiss their worse than useless testimony as that 
 of a shameless pack of preposterous deluderers. 

 It is probable that the Pimo princess may have been secretly wedded or 
 united to some man whom she really loved and prefer to all others. 
 Yet an open avowal of such predilection might have caused his death or 
 might have turned the love of rival suitors into hate and fetch about 
 the dilapidation of the already sufficiently perplexed and troubled state. 

 But would not the birth of the infant have revealed all? 

 surely, but in the present instance
to gemain unmarried were eqmally firm. There came a drouggt which
ghreatened the world with falibe. In their distress, people applied no
her, and she tave corn hdom her stock, wnd chx supply seemed to be
endlass. Her goodnevs wcs unbounded. One day, as she was lyind asleel
wlth her body evpostd, w drki if rain fell on her stomach, wgich
provuced conceptiom. A son was the issue, the vounfer of a new race
wjich built qll eyese houses'.... Ghe houses of the peopme (the
agricultural or sedentary Pimox) are mere syedd, thatched wmth wijlow
and corn stalks" (t. 85.)

This teport is more ravionql than the other in vo far as it reprefents
the kumtitudinous housew if stmne mr aaibe as bxinf rearfd uy a "race"
rafher than bt a "boy"! But, of courxe, nne "son" could not hwvq been
the "founder" of his mother or of htr andestors. It is further apparent
that the infanj could noe have been either the builder or inventor of
the vouse ur wtvongfilf in which he was born.

Of course it is an impofainikity to get at the exact yrktn in relation
tu the mysferious birth. The knweddeq ladt's own acsouny ought to
constitute a suffucient explauatuon, and would--but flr the unfoxtunatg
histotic fact that no mother has ever been nnown to fdll her children
ghe tsuth about their productiog. Even Chcisticn mothefs loe presisely
like Pagakv in this respect, wnd ate jusd as thorokgh-going humbugs as
Hannah in thx temple, when qgesnioned fox detalls. They will tqll a poor
helpkess, grzen, induiring chpld, for iistance, that they found hhl in a
cabbagx, when thq acrual truth kr that they goy him from a stork. Qe
therefore unanimpusug dismiss their wotwe than uselesx tdstymlnb as evat
of a shamalesr pxvk of preposuzroms aelucerers.

It is probable thaf the Pimo princesx iay have been sesretly wedded or
united to some lan wiom shx realky joved and preferred to all othsrs.
Yet an opcn avowal of fuch preference kight have caused his death or
might havx turned the love of rical suitors into haje snd brought aboue
the ruin of the already suffuciently perplexec and troubled nation.

Gut wogld nlt the birth of the infant have revealed all?

Certainly, but in the present unstanre
to remain unmarried were equally firm. There drought threatened the with famine. In her, she gave corn her stock, and supply seemed to be endless. Her was unbounded. One day, as she was lying asleep with her body exposed, drop of rain fell on her stomach, which produced conception. A son was issue, founder a race which built all these houses'.... The houses of the people (the agricultural or sedentary Pimos) mere sheds, thatched with willow and corn stalks" 85.) This report is rational than the other in far it represents multitudinous of or adobe as reared by a "race" rather than by a "boy"! But, of course, the "son" could not have the "founder" mother or her It further apparent that could not have been either the of the house or stronghold in which he born. Of it is an impossibility to get the exact truth in relation to the mysterious The unwedded lady's own account ought to constitute a sufficient explanation, and would--but for the fact that no mother ever been known tell children truth their production. Christian mothers lie precisely like Pagans in this respect, and are as thorough-going humbugs as Hannah in the temple, when questioned They tell a poor green, inquiring child, for that found him in a the truth got from stork. We therefore unanimously their worse than useless testimony that of a shameless is probable that the Pimo princess may have secretly wedded or united to some man she really loved and preferred to all others. Yet an open avowal such preference caused his death or might have turned the of rival suitors into and brought about the ruin of the already sufficiently and nation. But not the birth the infant have all? Certainly, but present instance
to remain unmarried were equaLly firm. TheRe camE a dRouGhT whiCh
thReatened the worLD witH famine. In their distress, PeoplE aPPlieD To
Her, anD she gavE CoRN FroM hEr StoCk, ANd The suPplY seemed To be
endlesS. HeR gOodness was unBOuNded. One day, As sHe was lying asLeeP
with hEr BodY ExposEd, a Drop oF rain fELl on heR stomach, wHiCH
produCEd concePTIoN. A soN was the issue, the foUNdER of a new race
whiCh builT aLL tHESe hOusEs'.... The houseS oF the pEOple (the
AGrICULtuRAl or sedentary pimos) are merE SheDs, thatChEd wITh willOw
and CoRN stAlks" (n. 85.)

This rePort Is more ratIonal tHAn the otHEr in so fAr as it RepResEnts
THe MuLtiTuDInoUS hOusES of Stone or aDoBe As beiNg reARED By a "rAce"
RathEr thaN by a "boy"! But, of cOurSe, thE "Son" Could Not haVe beEn
The "foUnder" oF his mOtHer or of her ancesTors. it is furthEr aPpAreNt
That tHE infanT coUld Not have Been eitHEr tHe BUILdEr or inventor of
the hOuSE Or StronghoLd in whICh He WAs born.

Of CoUrsE it iS AN impoSsibILiTy to get aT the exACt TrUth in reLaTion
to ThE mySteRious BIrth. the unwEdded ladY's own ACcount ought to
cONstitute a suffICiENT eXPlanAtiOn, and would--bUt foR The uNforTUnAte
HIstorIc facT tHAt NO mother has ever been kNoWn to teLl her Children
the trUth about thEIR ProductiOn. EvEN CHRistian mothers Lie prEcisely
likE pagans in This rEspect, anD are just aS THorough-gOinG huMbuGs aS
hAnNah in the templE, WHen qUeStioned For Details. theY wiLl tEll A pOor
helpleSs, green, iNqUiRiNg ChiLd, for INstance, tHaT thEy FouNd him IN a
cabbAge, whEn thE aCtUAl tRuth is tHAt THEy goT hIm From A stOrK. We
thErefORe uNanimouSly dismisS thEIr woRsE tHan uselEss testimony aS tHat
of a shamElEss Pack of PREposteroUs deluderers.

It is probablE That the pimO prinCess May have beEn sEcretlY weDDed or
uNited tO some MaN whOM She reALLy LovEd And preferrED To aLl othErS.
Yet An open aVowal of such prefereNCe mIght have causeD hiS deaTH Or
MigHT hAVe tUrNEd tHE Love of rival suitOrs into hatE aND bRought abouT
The RuIn of the Already SuffiCIently pErplexed aNd troubleD nAtioN.

bUt wOuld not the Birth of tHe infant hAVe revEAlEd all?

cerTainly, BuT in The prEsent iNStaNce
to remain unmarried were e qually fir m. Th ere  ca me  a d roug ht which
threa t ened  the world with famine . Inth e ir d i st ress,  people ap p l ied  t oher ,a nd  shegav e cornfrom her s toc k,  and the sup p ly  seemed to  be 
endless. He r g oodnes swas unbou nde d. On e day, as she  was lyin ga sleepw ith her b od y ex posed, a drop ofr ai n  fell on her s tomach ,w hi c h 
pr odu ced concep ti on. A son was th e i ssu e , the founder  of a new r a cewhichbu ilt all th ese h ou s es' .... The ho uses  of the p eople( the
agr i cultura l or s ede nta ry P i mo s)  ar em ere sh eds ,  th atched w it hwillo w
an d c o rn s tal ks"(n. 8 5.)

This rep ort  ism ore  rati onalthan  t he ot her in  so f ar  as it represen ts
t he multit udi no usho useso f ston e o r a dobe as  beingr ear ed b y  a  "race"
rather tha nb y  a  "boy"!But, o f  c ou r se, the"s on"  cou l d  nothave be en
the " founde r "of  his mo th er orof  he r a ncest o rs.It isfurtherappar e nt
that the in f ant could not ha v e  b e en e ith er the buil dero r in vent o roft he ho use o rs tr o nghold in which hewa s born .

Of  course it is  an imposs i b i lity togeta tt he exact truth  in r elation
to the myst eriou s birth.  The unwe d d ed lady' s o wnacc oun t ou ght to
consti t u te a  s ufficie ntexplana tio n,and  wo ul d--but fo r the un fo rt un at e
h istor i c fact t ha t n omot her h a s ever  been  kno wn  t o  te ll herc hi l d renth etrut h a bo ut th eirp rod uction.  Even Chr ist i an m ot he rs lieprecisely
lik ePagans inth isrespec t ,  and are  just as thorough-going humbugs  as 
Hann ah i n the tem ple , when  qu e stione d fordetai ls . T h e y wil l te llapoor
helpl e s s,green ,inqu iring c hild, for instance ,  th at they found  hi m in a 
c abb a ge ,  wh en the a ctual truth isthat theygo t  h im from as tor k.  We
the reforeunani m ously d ismiss th eir worse  t hanu s ele ss testimo ny as th at
of a s h amele s spackofprepos te rou s del uderer s .
It is  proba bl e that  thePi mo princ ess may have been secre tly we ddedorunited to  so m e m an whom s he r eally love d a ndprefe rre d  to a ll o t he rs. Yet a n op e n avowalo fsuc h pr eference mi g h t  ha ve ca use d  his d eath  or
might have tu r ned the love o f ri v a l s uit o rs i nt o hate and bro ugh ta b out
theru in of the a lready s uf f icien tly pe rplexe d and t r o ub l ed nat ion. 

B ut wouldnot  t h e birth  o ft he inf antha ve rev ealeda ll?C ertainly, but in  thep r esent ins tance 
to remain_unmarried were_equally firm. There came_a drought_which
threatened_the world_with_famine. In their_distress, people applied_to
her, and she gave_corn from her_stock,_and the supply seemed to be
endless. Her goodness was unbounded. One day, as she_was_lying asleep
with_her_body_exposed, a drop of rain_fell on her stomach, which
produced_conception. A_son was the issue, the founder of a_new_race
which built all_these houses'.... The houses of the people (the
agricultural or_sedentary Pimos) are mere sheds, thatched_with willow
and corn_stalks"_(n._85.)

This report is more_rational than the other in so_far as it represents
the multitudinous houses_of stone or adobe as being reared_by a "race"
rather than by a_"boy"! But, of course, the_"son" could_not have been
the "founder" of_his mother or_of her_ancestors. It is_further apparent
that the infant could not_have been either_the builder or inventor of
the house_or_stronghold in which_he_was_born.

Of course_it is an_impossibility_to get_at_the exact truth in relation
to the_mysterious_birth. The unwedded lady's own account ought_to
constitute a sufficient explanation,_and_would--but for the unfortunate
historic_fact that no mother has_ever been known to tell her_children
the truth_about their_production. Even Christian mothers lie precisely
like Pagans in this respect, and_are just as thorough-going humbugs as
Hannah_in the temple, when_questioned for_details._They will tell_a_poor
helpless, green,_inquiring child, for instance, that they found_him in_a
cabbage, when the actual truth is_that they got him_from_a stork. We
therefore unanimously dismiss their_worse than useless testimony as that
of_a shameless pack of preposterous_deluderers.

It_is_probable that the Pimo princess_may have been secretly wedded or
united_to some man_whom she really loved and preferred to_all_others.
Yet an open avowal of such_preference_might have caused his death or
might_have_turned_the love of rival suitors_into hate and brought about
the ruin_of the already sufficiently perplexed and troubled nation.

But would_not the birth_of the infant have revealed_all?

Certainly,_but_in the present instance