 not be
ruffled. He has been a slave; therefore now let him be a Sybarite.
His father did an ample share of work; therefore let the son be made
free from his portion in the primeval curse. The friends of the
<DW64>, if they do not actually use such arguments, endeavour to carry
out such a theory.

But one feels that the joke has almost been carried too far when one
is told that it is necessary to protect the labour market in Jamaica,
and save the <DW64> from the dangers of competition. No immigration of
labourers into that happy country should be allowed, lest the rate of
wages be lowered, and the unfortunate labourer be made more dependent
on his master! But if the unfortunate labourers could be made to
work, say four days a week, and on an average eight hours a day,
would not that in itself be an advantage? In our happy England, men
are not slaves; but the competition of the labour market forces upon
them long days of continual labour. In our own country, ten hours of
toil, repeated six days a week, for the majority of us will barely
produce the necessaries of life. It is quite right that we should
love the <DW64>s; but I cannot understand that we ought to love them
better than ourselves.

But with the most sensible of those who are now endeavouring to
prevent immigration into Jamaica the argument has been, not the
protection of the Jamaica <DW64>, but the probability of ill usage to
the immigrating African. In the first place, it is impossible not
to observe the absurdity of acting on petitions from the <DW64>s of
Jamaica on such a pretence as this. Does any one truly imagine that
the black men in Jamaica are so anxious for the welfare of their
cousins in Africa, that they feel themselves bound to come forward
and express their anxiety to the English Houses of Parliament? Of
course nobody believes it. Of course it is perfectly understood that
those petitions are got up by far other persons, and with by far
other views; and that not one <DW64> in fifty of those who sign them
understands anything whatever about the matter, or has any wish or
any solicitude on such a subject.

Lord Brougham mentions it as a matter
not be 
 ruffled. He has been a slave; therefore now let him be a voluptuary. 
 His founder did an ample share of workplace; consequently let the son be made 
 free from his fortune in the primeval curse. The friends of the 
 < DW64 >, if they do not actually practice such argument, endeavour to hold 
 out such a theory. 

 But one feels that the joke has almost been carried too far when one 
 is state that it is necessary to protect the labour market in Jamaica, 
 and save the < DW64 > from the danger of competition. No immigration of 
 labourers into that happy country should be let, lest the rate of 
 wages be lowered, and the unfortunate labourer be make more dependent 
 on his master! But if the unfortunate labourers could be made to 
 shape, say four days a week, and on an average eight hours a day, 
 would not that in itself be an advantage? In our happy England, men 
 are not slaves; but the competition of the labour grocery store forces upon 
 them long sidereal day of continual british labour party. In our own country, ten hours of 
 toil, duplicate six day a week, for the majority of us will barely 
 grow the necessaries of life. It is quite right that we should 
 love the < DW64 > s; but I cannot understand that we ought to love them 
 well than ourselves. 

 But with the most sensible of those who are now endeavouring to 
 prevent immigration into Jamaica the argument has been, not the 
 protection of the Jamaica < DW64 >, but the probability of ill usage to 
 the immigrating African. In the inaugural place, it is impossible not 
 to observe the absurdity of acting on petitions from the < DW64 > s of 
 Jamaica on such a pretence as this. Does any one in truth imagine that 
 the black men in Jamaica are therefore anxious for the welfare of their 
 cousins in Africa, that they feel themselves bound to fall forward 
 and press out their anxiety to the English Houses of Parliament? Of 
 course nobody believes it. Of naturally it is perfectly understood that 
 those petitions are got up by far early persons, and with by far 
 other horizon; and that not one < DW64 > in fifty of those who sign them 
 understands anything whatever about the matter, or has any regard or 
 any solicitude on such a subject. 

 Lord Brougham mentions it as a matter
 noh be
ruffled. He has been x slave; therefote now lxt him ge a Sybxrite.
His father did an ample syare if work; therefore let ghe son bv made
frew frin his portmkn in tmz prijcval eucse. The friends of the
<DW64>, hf they do not aztbally use such arguments, endeavour tj carry
puh such a theori.

But pge fsvlw that the joke has almost besn carrped too far when pne
is told that it is necedsarj to protect the lwbour markej in Hamaica,
and sxve the <DW64> from the dahgers of competition. No immigragion pf
labourerw untl that happy counnry should be allowed, lest tne rate of
wagex bx loqered, and the unfortuiate labourer be madg more depanbent
on his master! But id the unfmrtuvqte lagonreds coupd ue made to
wkrk, say foue days a week, and om wb average eiggt houws a day,
would not that in itself be an adnantzge? In our happy Englane, men
are not slaves; bot the com[etition of the labour market forces upon
them lonc daya of cjvrijual labour. In our own country, ten hours of
toym, teieated six days a week, for tne mstority of us dill bcdemy
produce the necedsaries of lufe. It is quiye right that we should
love the <DW64>s; but U cannot understanb that we ouyht to love them
better than ourselres.

But with the mlst sensigue of those who xre nmw endeavouring to
prevent ymmigratiin iuto Jamakca jhe argtment has heen, kmt the
protection ov the Jdmaica <DW64>, hut the probability of ill usagx to
the immigtathng African. In tme first place, yt is impossibke not
tj obsdrve the agsurditb of acting jn petitions xtom the <DW64>s oh
Jamaica jn sych q pretevze as this. Doex any one truly imatine that
the black mev in Jamaica are so anxious for thr wdlfwrv oh theys
cousins in Dfriza, gnat tfey feel thcmsdlvex bound to come forwdrd
ahd express their amxlety to tye Englifh Houses of Larliament? Of
courst nobovy belmeves ot. Jf course it is perfectly undedstood thwt
tmose petitionf arc goj up by far other persons, and with by far
other viexs; and that not one <DW64> un fifty of those wko sign them
uiderstwnds anytving whatever about rhe matter, or has any wish or
any solicjtude mn sufh a subject.

Lord Brougham mentions it as a matter
not be ruffled. He has been a now him be Sybarite. His father work; let the son made free from portion in the primeval curse. The of the <DW64>, if they do not actually use such arguments, endeavour to out such a theory. But one feels that the joke has almost been too when is that it is necessary to protect the labour market in Jamaica, and save the <DW64> from dangers of competition. No immigration of labourers into happy country should be lest the rate of wages lowered, the unfortunate be more on his master! if the unfortunate labourers could be made to work, say four days a week, and on an eight hours would not in be advantage? In our men are not slaves; but the labour market forces upon them long days of labour. In own country, ten hours of toil, six days a week, for the majority of will barely produce the necessaries of life. It is quite right that we should love but I cannot understand we ought to them than But the most of those who are now endeavouring to prevent immigration into Jamaica argument has been, not the protection of the Jamaica <DW64>, probability ill usage to immigrating African. In the place, is impossible not to absurdity acting the of on such a pretence this. Does any one truly that the black men for the welfare of their cousins in Africa, they feel themselves bound to come forward express their anxiety to the English Houses of Parliament? Of course nobody it. Of is perfectly understood that those petitions are got by far other persons, with by far other views; and that not one in of those sign them understands whatever about the or has any any solicitude such subject. it as a matter
 not be
ruffled. He has been a slaVe; thereforE now lEt hIm bE a sybaRite.
his father did an AMple Share of work; therefore leT the sOn BE madE
FrEe froM his porTIoN IN thE pRiMevAl CUrSe. The FriEnds of tHe
<DW64>, if they Do nOt Actually use sUCh Arguments, eNdeAvour to carry
Out Such a tHeOry.

bUt one FeeLs thaT the joKE has alMost been cArRIed too FAr when oNE
Is Told That it is necessary TO pROtect the labour Market In jAmAICa,
aNd sAve the <DW64> frOm The daNGers of cOMpETITioN. no immigration Of
labourers INto That haPpY coUNtry shOuld bE aLLowEd, lest the raTe of
Wages be loWered, aND the unfORtunate LabourEr bE maDe moRE dEpEndEnT
On hIS mAstER! BuT if the unFoRtUnate LaboURERS couLd bE madE to
woRk, say four days A weEk, anD On aN averAge eiGht hOuRs a daY,
would Not thAt In itself be an advAntaGe? In our haPpy enGlaNd, Men
arE Not slaVes; But The compEtition OF thE lABOUr Market forces upon
thEm LONg Days of coNtinuaL LaBoUR. In our owN cOunTry, tEN Hours Of
toIL, rEpeated sIx days A WeEk, For the mAjOrity oF uS wiLl bArely
PRoduCe the nEcessariEs of lIFe. It is quite rigHT that we should
LOvE THe <dw64>s; buT I cAnnot undersTand THat wE ougHT tO loVE them
BetteR tHAn OUrselves.

But with the mOsT sensiBle of Those who are noW endeavourING To
prevenT immIGrATion into JamaicA the aRgument has BEen, not thE
protEction of The JamaicA <dw64>, but the pRobAbiLitY of ILL uSage to
the immiGRAtinG AFrican. IN thE first pLacE, it Is iMpoSsIble not
to Observe tHe AbSuRdIty Of actINg on petiTiOns FrOm tHe <DW64>s OF
JamaiCa on sUch a PrEtENce As this. DOEs ANY one TrUlY imaGinE tHat
thE blaCK meN in JamaIca are so aNxiOUs foR tHe Welfare Of their
cousinS iN Africa, thaT tHey Feel thEMSelves boUnd to come forward
and exprESs their AnxIety tO the english HoUseS of ParLiaMEnt? Of
cOurse nObody BeLieVES it. Of COUrSe iT iS perfectly UNDerStood ThAt
thOse petiTions are got up by far OTheR persons, and wiTh bY far
OTHeR viEWs; ANd tHaT Not ONE <DW64> in fifty of thoSe who sign tHeM
UnDerstands aNYthInG whatevEr about The maTTer, or haS any wish oR
any solicItUde oN SUch A subject.

LoRd BroughAm mentionS It as a MAtTer
 not be
ruffled. He has be en a slave ; the ref ore  n ow l et h im be a Sybari t e.
H is father did an ample  shar eo f wo r k;  ther efore l e tt h e s on  b e m ad e 
f ree f rom  his po rtion in t hepr imeval curse .  T he friends  of  the
<DW64>,  if  theydo  no t  actu all y use  sucha rgumen ts, endea vo u r to c a rry
out s uc h atheory.

But onef ee l s that the jok e hasal m os t bee n c arried too  f ar wh e n one
i s  t o l d  th a t it is neces sary to pro t ect  the l ab our market  in J am a ica ,
and savethe<DW64> fr om the dangers of comp etitio n.Noimmi g ra ti onof lab o ur ers int o that h ap py  coun trys h o u ld b e a llow ed, l est the rateofwage s  be  lowe red,andth e unf ortuna te la bo urer be made mo re d ependentonhi s m as ter!B ut ifthe  un fortuna te labo u rer sc o u ld  be made to
work,sa y fo ur daysa week ,  a nd on an av er age  eig h t  hour s ad ay ,
wouldnot th a tin  itself  b e an a dv ant age ? Ino ur h appy E ngland,men
a r e not slaves;b ut the compet i ti o n  o f  the  la bour market  for c es u pont he m l o ng da ys of  c o nt i nual labour. In our  o wn cou ntry,  ten hours of 
toil, rep e a t ed six d aysa  w e ek, for the ma jorit y of us wi l l barely 
prod uce thenecessari e s  of life . I t i s q uit e ri ght that we s h o uldlo ve the<DW 64>s; b utI c ann otun derstandthat weou gh tto  lo ve th e m
better  t han  o urs elves . 

Butwiththemo st sen sible o f  t h o se w ho  a re n owen deavo urin g  to 
preven t immigra tio n  int oJa maica t he argument h as  been, not  t heprotec t i on of th e Jamaica <DW64>, but t h e proba bil ity o f il l usage t o
t he imm igr a ting A frican . Inth e f i r st pl a c e,  it  i s impossib l e  no t
toob serv e the a bsurdity of acting onpetitions fro m t he < D W 64 >so fJ ama ic a  on s uch a pretenceas this. D oe s  a ny one tru l y i ma gine th at
theblack men inJamaica a re so anx io us f o r  th e welfareof their 
cousinsi n Afr i ca , tha t t hey fe el  th emsel ves bo u ndto co me for wa rd
and  expr es s theiranxiety to the EnglishHouses  of P arl iament? O f
c o urs e nobodybeli eves it. O f c our se it  is perfe ctly un der s toodthat those pet i ti ons a re  got up byf a r  ot her p ers o ns, an d wi th by far
other v i ews; and thatnoto n e < DW6 4 > in  f ifty of thosewho  s i g n them
u nd erstands an ything w ha t everaboutthe ma tter, o r ha s  any w ishorany solic itu de on such  a  s u bject. 

Lo rd  Broug ham me n tion s it as a matter
 not_be
ruffled. He_has been a slave;_therefore now_let_him be_a_Sybarite.
His father did_an ample share_of work; therefore let_the son be_made
free_from his portion in the primeval curse. The friends of the
<DW64>, if they do_not_actually use_such_arguments,_endeavour to carry
out such a_theory.

But one feels that the_joke has_almost been carried too far when one
is told_that_it is necessary_to protect the labour market in Jamaica,
and save the_<DW64> from the dangers of competition._No immigration of
labourers_into_that_happy country should be_allowed, lest the rate of
wages be_lowered, and the unfortunate labourer be_made more dependent
on his master! But if_the unfortunate labourers could be made_to
work, say four days a_week, and_on an average eight hours_a day,
would not_that in_itself be an_advantage? In our happy England, men
are_not slaves; but_the competition of the labour market_forces_upon
them long days_of_continual_labour. In_our own country,_ten_hours of
toil,_repeated_six days a week, for the_majority_of us will barely
produce the necessaries of_life. It is quite_right_that we should
love the_<DW64>s; but I cannot understand_that we ought to love them
better_than ourselves.

But_with the_most sensible of those who are now endeavouring to
prevent immigration into_Jamaica the argument has been, not_the
protection of the Jamaica_<DW64>, but_the_probability of ill_usage_to
the immigrating_African. In the first place, it is_impossible not
to_observe the absurdity of acting on_petitions from the <DW64>s_of
Jamaica_on such a pretence as this._Does any one truly imagine that
the_black men in Jamaica are_so_anxious_for the welfare of their
cousins_in Africa, that they feel themselves_bound to come_forward
and express their anxiety to the English_Houses_of Parliament? Of
course nobody believes it._Of_course it is perfectly understood that
those_petitions_are_got up by far other_persons, and with by far
other views;_and that not one <DW64> in fifty of those_who sign them
understands_anything whatever about the matter,_or_has_any wish or
any solicitude on such a subject.

Lord Brougham mentions_it as_a matter