 Adam's
day, but is certainly man's blessing in our day. And what is eating
one's bread in the sweat of one's brow but making money? I will
believe no man who tells me that he would not sooner earn two loaves
than one;--and if two, then two hundred. I will believe no man who
tells me that he would sooner earn one dollar a day than two;--and
if two, then two hundred. That is, in the very nature of the
argument,--_coeteris paribus_. When a man tells me that he would
prefer one honest loaf to two that are dishonest, I will, in all
possible cases, believe him. So also a man may prefer one quiet loaf
to two that are unquiet. But under circumstances that are the same,
and to a man who is sane, a whole loaf is better than half, and two
loaves are better than one. The preachers have preached well, but on
this matter they have preached in vain. Dives has never believed that
he will be damned because he is Dives. He has never even believed
that the temptations incident to his position have been more than a
fair counterpoise, or even so much as a fair counterpoise, to his
opportunities for doing good. All men who work desire to prosper
by their work, and they so desire by the nature given to them from
God. Wealth and progress must go on hand in hand together, let the
accidents which occasionally divide them for a time happen as often
as they may. The progress of the Americans has been caused by their
aptitude for money-making, and that continual kneeling at the shrine
of the coined goddess has carried them across from New York to San
Francisco. Men who kneel at that shrine are called on to have ready
wits, and quick hands, and not a little aptitude for self-denial. The
New Yorker has been true to his dollar, because his dollar has been
true to him.

But not on this account can I, nor on this account will any
Englishman, reconcile himself to the savour of dollars which pervades
the atmosphere of New York. The _ars celare artem_ is wanting. The
making of money is the work of man; but he need not take his work
to bed with
Adam's 
 day, but is certainly man's blessing in our sidereal day. And what is feed 
 one's bread in the sweat of one's eyebrow but make money? I will 
 believe no man who order me that he would not preferably earn two loaves 
 than one;--and if two, then two hundred. I will believe no man who 
 tells me that he would preferably earn one dollar a day than two;--and 
 if two, then two hundred. That is, in the very nature of the 
 argument,--_coeteris paribus _. When a man tell me that he would 
 prefer one honest loaf to two that are dishonest, I will, in all 
 possible font, believe him. So besides a man may prefer one hushed loaf 
 to two that are anxious. But under circumstances that are the like, 
 and to a man who is sane, a whole loaf is good than half, and two 
 loaves are better than one. The preachers have preached well, but on 
 this topic they have preach in vain. Dives has never believed that 
 he will be damned because he is Dives. He has never even believed 
 that the temptations incident to his position have been more than a 
 fair counterpoise, or even thus much as a fair counterpoise, to his 
 opportunity for do commodity. All men who work desire to prosper 
 by their work, and they so desire by the nature given to them from 
 God. Wealth and progress must proceed on hand in hand together, let the 
 accident which occasionally divide them for a time happen as frequently 
 as they may. The progress of the Americans has been cause by their 
 aptitude for money - making, and that continual kneeling at the shrine 
 of the coined goddess has carried them across from New York to San 
 Francisco. Men who kneel at that shrine are call on to have ready 
 wits, and immediate hands, and not a little aptitude for self - denial. The 
 New Yorker has been true to his dollar, because his dollar has been 
 on-key to him. 

 But not on this account can I, nor on this bill will any 
 Englishman, reconcile himself to the savour of dollar which pervades 
 the standard atmosphere of New York. The _ ars celare artem _ is want. The 
 making of money is the oeuvre of man; but he need not take his work 
 to bed with
 Adwm's
day, but is certainly oan's blessing iu our dey. And shat is dating
one's bread in the sweav of one's brow but making money? I will
bepieve no man qho tells me that mz woumf noc wooner earn twp loaves
thdn one;--and if tfo, tken two hundred. I will believe no mag who
tekld me that he wjuld foonsg tarn one dollar a day than two;--and
jf two, uhen two hundred. Tnat is, in the very nature lf tje
argument,--_coeteris paribus_. Whgh a nan tells me that he would
prefer ohe honest loaf to two that are aishouest, I will, ib apn
possible ceses, bvlieve him. So also a kan may prefer one qulet lmaf
ro two that are unquixt. But under circumsjances thad cre the same,
and to a nab who is vane, q wfolt lpar is bfttxr than halr, and two
loqves are better tham jbe. The preachsrs hade preached well, but on
this matter they hdve preached in vain. Dives has never believed tjat
he wilj be damned because he is Dives. He has never even belixvdd
tkqt thd tfmptations incident to his position have been jote than a
fair comnterpoise, or even sl koch as a fair zountexlojse, to his
opportunlties fjr doung good. Wll ken who work desire to prosper
by their corj, and they so desixe by the nacure goven yo them from
God. Wealth cnd prkgress must go on haha in hand togethdr, ked the
accidents which occasyonally dmvide them fur a time rappen as lften
as they may. The prohress ox the Amerlcans has been caused by their
a'vitude for momef-maning, and that continual knqeling at the xhrine
oy the zoined godsess hav carried trem across frml New York tm San
Fragcisxo. Mwn who yveel at that snrine are called on to have ready
wits, ana quick hands, anb bot a little apyitjde flr sqnf-denial. The
Tew Horyrr har been uxue go hos dollar, because hiv domlar has been
true yo him.

But bot on tris account csn I, nor on this afcounv will any
Emglyshman, reconcile himself to ths savour lf qollars whicr pevvadgs
the atmos'here of New York. The _ars celare artem_ iw wanting. The
makint of money is the wpvk of man; buv he nqed not tdke his work
to bed wuth
Adam's day, but is certainly man's blessing day. what is one's bread in but money? I will no man who me that he would not sooner two loaves than one;--and if two, then two hundred. I will believe no who tells me that he would sooner earn one dollar a day than if then hundred. is, in the very nature of the argument,--_coeteris paribus_. When a man tells me that he prefer one honest loaf to two that are I will, in all cases, believe him. So also man prefer one loaf two are unquiet. But circumstances that are the same, and to a man who is sane, a whole loaf is better half, and are better one. preachers preached well, but matter they have preached in vain. believed that he will be damned because he Dives. He never even believed that the temptations to his position have been more than a counterpoise, or even so much as a fair counterpoise, to his opportunities for doing good. who work desire to by their work, they desire the given to from God. Wealth and progress must go on hand in hand let the accidents which occasionally divide them for a time often they may. The of the Americans has caused their aptitude for money-making, continual at the goddess carried them across from York to San Francisco. Men kneel at that shrine ready wits, and quick hands, and not a aptitude for self-denial. The New Yorker has true to his dollar, because his dollar has been true to him. not on can I, nor on this account will any reconcile himself to the of dollars which pervades the atmosphere of New York. _ars artem_ is The making of is the work man; but he take his to with
 Adam's
day, but is certainly man'S blessing iN our dAy. ANd wHaT is eAtinG
one's bread in thE SweaT of one's brow but making moNey? I wIlL
BeliEVe No man Who tellS Me THAt hE wOuLd nOt SOoNer eaRn tWo loaveS
than one;--anD if TwO, then two hundREd. i will belieVe nO man who
tells Me tHat he wOuLd sOOner eArn One doLlar a dAY than tWo;--and
if twO, tHEn two hUNdred. ThAT Is, In thE very nature of the
aRGuMEnt,--_coeteris parIbus_. WhEn A MaN TEllS me That he woulD
pRefer ONe honesT LoAF TO twO That are dishonEst, I will, in aLL
poSsible CaSes, BElieve Him. So AlSO a mAn may prefer One qUiet loaf
tO two thAT are unqUIet. But uNder ciRcuMstAnceS ThAt Are ThE SamE,
AnD to A Man Who is sanE, a WhOle loAf is BETTEr thAn hAlf, aNd two
Loaves are bettEr tHan oNE. ThE preaChers Have PrEacheD well, bUt on
tHiS matter they have PreaChed in vaiN. DiVeS haS nEver bELieved ThaT
he Will be dAmned beCAusE hE IS diVes. He has never even bElIEVeD
that the TemptaTIoNs INcident tO hIs pOsitION have Been MOrE than a
faIr counTErPoIse, or evEn So much As A faIr cOunteRPoisE, to his
OpportunIties FOr doing good. All MEn who work desiRE tO PRoSPer
bY thEir work, and tHey sO DesiRe by THe NatURe givEn to tHeM FrOM
God. Wealth and progreSs Must go On hanD in hand togethEr, let the
acCIDEnts whicH occASiONally divide theM for a Time happen AS often
as They mAy. The proGress of thE aMericans Has BeeN caUseD BY tHeir
aptitude fOR MoneY-mAking, anD thAt contiNuaL knEelIng At The shrine
Of the coiNeD gOdDeSs hAs carRIed them aCrOss FrOm NEw YorK To San
FRanciSco. MEn WhO KneEl at thaT ShRINe arE cAlLed oN to HaVe reaDy
wiTS, anD quick hAnds, and noT a lITtle ApTiTude for Self-denial. The
neW Yorker has BeEn tRue to hIS Dollar, beCause his dollar has been
trUE to him.

BUt nOt on tHis aCcount can i, noR on thiS acCOunt wiLl any
ENglisHmAn, rECOncilE HImSelF tO the savour OF DolLars wHiCh peRvades
tHe atmosphere of New YORk. THe _ars celare arTem_ Is waNTInG. ThE
MaKIng Of MOneY IS the work of man; buT he need not TaKE hIs work
to beD WitH
 Adam's
day, but is certai nly man'sbless ing  in  o ur d ay.And what is ea t ingone's bread in the swe at of  o n e'sb ro w but  making mo n e y?Iwi llbe l ie ve no  ma n who t ells me th athe  would not s o on er earn tw o l oaves
than o ne; --andif  tw o , the n t wo hu ndred. I will  believeno man wh o 
tellsm e  t hathe would sooner e a rn one dollar a d ay tha nt wo ; - -an d
i f two, the ntwo h u ndred.T ha t i s,i n the very na ture of the arg ument, -- _co e terisparib us _ . W hen a man t ells  me thathe wou l d
prefe r  one ho nest l oaf  to  two th at  ar ed ish o ne st, I w ill, inal lpossi blec a s e s, b eli evehim.So also a man  ma y pr e fer  onequiet  loa fto tw o that  areun quiet. But unde r ci rcumstanc esth atar e the same,and  to  a manwho iss ane ,a w ho le loaf is betterth a n  h alf, and  two
l o av es are bett er  th an o n e . The  pre a ch ers have  preac h ed  w ell, bu ton
thi smat ter  they have  preac hed in v ain.D ives has never believed that he w il l  bedam ned because  hei s Di ves. He  ha s  neve r eve nb el i eved
that the tempt at ions i ncide nt to his pos ition have b e en morethan af air counterpoi se, o r even som uch as a  fair  counter poise, to h is
oppor tun iti esfor d oi ng good. Allm e n wh owork de sir e to pr osp erbythe ir  work, an d they s ode si re  by  then ature gi ve n t othe m fro m 
God.Wealt h an dpr o gre ss must go o n ha nd  i n ha ndto gethe r, l e t t he
acci dents whi cho ccas io na lly div ide them foratime happe nasoftena s  they ma y. The progress of theA merican s h as be en c aused bythe ir
apt itu d e formoney- makin g,  an d thatc o nt inu al  kneelinga t  th e shr in e
of  the co ined goddess has c a rri ed them acros s f romN e wYor k  t o  Sa nF ran c i sco. Men who kn eel at tha ts hr ine are ca l led  o n to ha ve read y
wit s , and q uick hand s, and no ta li t t leaptitude f or self- denial. T h e
New Yo rkerhas  beentr ueto hi s doll a r,becau se his  d ollarhas b ee n
true t o him.

But not on this  accou nt ca n I , nor onthi s  ac count wil l an y
Englishm an,  re conci leh imsel f to th e s a vourof d o llars whi c hper v a de s
the atmos p h e reof Ne w Y o rk. Th e _a rs celare artem_i s wanting. The 
mak i n g o f m o neyis  the work of m an;  b u t  he need  n ot take his  work
to  b e d wit h
 Adam's
day,_but is_certainly man's blessing in_our day._And_what is_eating
one's_bread in the_sweat of one's_brow but making money?_I will
believe no_man_who tells me that he would not sooner earn two loaves
than one;--and if two,_then_two hundred._I_will_believe no man who
tells me_that he would sooner earn_one dollar_a day than two;--and
if two, then two hundred._That_is, in the_very nature of the
argument,--_coeteris paribus_. When a man tells_me that he would
prefer one honest_loaf to two_that_are_dishonest, I will, in_all
possible cases, believe him. So also_a man may prefer one quiet_loaf
to two that are unquiet. But under_circumstances that are the same,
and to_a man who is sane,_a whole_loaf is better than half,_and two
loaves are_better than_one. The preachers_have preached well, but on
this matter_they have preached_in vain. Dives has never believed_that
he_will be damned_because_he_is Dives._He has never_even_believed
that the_temptations_incident to his position have been_more_than a
fair counterpoise, or even so much_as a fair counterpoise,_to_his
opportunities for doing good._All men who work desire_to prosper
by their work, and they_so desire_by the_nature given to them from
God. Wealth and progress must go on_hand in hand together, let the
accidents_which occasionally divide them_for a_time_happen as often
as_they_may. The_progress of the Americans has been caused_by their
aptitude_for money-making, and that continual kneeling_at the shrine
of the_coined_goddess has carried them across from_New York to San
Francisco. Men who_kneel at that shrine are_called_on_to have ready
wits, and quick_hands, and not a little aptitude_for self-denial. The
New_Yorker has been true to his dollar,_because_his dollar has been
true to him.

But_not_on this account can I, nor_on_this_account will any
Englishman, reconcile himself_to the savour of dollars which_pervades
the atmosphere of New York. The _ars celare artem__is wanting. The
making_of money is the work_of_man;_but he need not take his work
to bed with