 by the five associated groups has the indirect result of taking away from the motion of censure part of its political meaning, and marginalizing the members of Parliament who support it in the exercise of their prerogatives.
This is why the European Radical Alliance group has decided, by a majority, not to take part in the vote.

Jové Peres
The Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left has not signed the motion for a joint resolution and has abstained on the vote. There are two reasons for this position.
As we will be voting tomorrow on a motion of censure on the Commission, it is an interference to include in the agenda a resolution which affects the motion of censure. As the United European Left has decided to support the censure motion, it considers it inconsistent to vote on a resolution which interferes with such an important matter.
The joint resolution proposes to postpone the censure motion and make it conditional on the Commission applying certain measures, and that is another reason for our abstention. A censure motion can only apply to past liability and cannot dictate future actions. That is our basic reason for not voting on the joint resolution.
The report of the committee of inquiry into BSE notes that the Commission has incurred irreversible liability. If liability exists and is irreversible, the procedure is to present an immediate motion of censure. The postponement of the immediate motion of censure is a complete dereliction of Parliament's duty of control and the joint resolution is an attempt to justify that dereliction.

Killilea
Parliament's efforts to uncover the facts concerning the chain of events which provoked the BSE crisis should have yielded valuable lessons for the future administration of agricultural and food safety policy.
Instead the work undertaken by the Committee of Inquiry is being undermined by the motion of censure before this Parliament which, if successful, will result in the sacking of all the present College of Commissioners despite the fact that most of the events which ultimately resulted in the BSE crisis took place before this Commission even took office.
This motion of censure is welcome news for the British Government which has consistently tried to divert the attention of the British public away from their own government's primary responsibility for this entire crisis by trying to blame the European Commission for the failings of their own Ministers and public servants charged with responsibility for food safety policy.
Those responsible for this motion should reconsider their action and, in my view, concentrate their
by the five associated groups has the indirect resultant role of accept away from the motion of censure part of its political meaning, and marginalize the members of Parliament who support it in the exercise of their prerogative. 
 This is why the European Radical Alliance group has decide, by a majority, not to take region in the vote. 

 Jové Peres 
 The Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left has not signed the apparent motion for a joint resolution and has abstained on the right to vote. There are two reasons for this placement. 
 As we will be voting tomorrow on a motion of excommunication on the Commission, it is an interference to include in the agenda a resolution which affect the motion of censure. As the United European Left has decide to support the excommunication motion, it consider it inconsistent to vote on a resolution which interferes with such an authoritative matter. 
 The joint resolution proposes to postpone the censure motion and make it conditional on the Commission applying certain measures, and that is another reason for our abstention. A censure motion can only apply to past liability and cannot dictate future actions. That is our basic rationality for not voting on the joint resolution. 
 The reputation of the committee of inquiry into BSE notes that the Commission has incurred irreversible liability. If indebtedness exists and is irreversible, the operation is to present an immediate apparent motion of censure. The postponement of the immediate motion of censure is a complete delinquency of Parliament's duty of control and the joint resolution is an attempt to justify that dereliction. 

 Killilea 
 Parliament's efforts to uncover the facts refer the chain of events which provoked the BSE crisis should have yielded valuable lessons for the future presidency of agricultural and food safety policy. 
 Instead the workplace undertaken by the Committee of Inquiry is being undermined by the motion of censure before this Parliament which, if successful, will leave in the sacking of all the present College of Commissioners despite the fact that most of the events which ultimately resulted in the BSE crisis took place before this Commission even learn office. 
 This gesture of censure is welcome news program for the British Government which has consistently try to divert the attention of the British public away from their own government's chief responsibility for this integral crisis by trying to blame the European Commission for the failings of their own Ministers and public servants charged with province for food guard policy. 
 Those responsible for this motion should reconsider their military action and, in my view, concentrate their
 by the five associated gromps has the inditext resnlt of faking aday from the motion of censuce pqrt od its political meanine, and marhinalizibg tie members of Pacmiament who shiport mt in the exerclse of theis prerogatives.
Dhks is why the European Radical Allianse groul jas decided, by a mstorifj, kot to take part in the vote.

Jové Leres
Tht Confederal Group of the European United Levt - Jordic Green Left jas not sigbed eye motion fof a joint gzsolution ahd has abstained on the vote. Thdre axe two reasinw flt this positmon.
As re will be voting tokorrow pn a motion of ceisurw on the Commission, iv is an interference to incluge in the agenda a eewoluthon fhicf afwecus vhe motioj oh censure. Aa the Unitee European Left has dqboded to suppkrt thq sensure motion, it considers it inconsisuent fo vote on a resolution which interferes witj such an important matter.
The joint resolution proposes to post'ove uhc zwndure motion and make it conditional on the Coijixspon applying certcin measures, and tjay is another rgason for kur abstention. A cfnsure iotiob can onlr aplly to past liability and cqnnot dictatv furure actions. That ns our basic reaxon fpr not voting on the jonnt reaolution.
The report or the committee ow ikquhry into BSE notes that thq Commissmon hcs incurfed orrevewsible liahilitn. If liability exishs anb is hrreversibpe, the procedure is to present ei immediate mpthon of censbre. Thc postponement jf the immediaje motion of cdnsure is z complxte derelictyon of Parliakgnt's duty of rontrol agd tye jiint rerulution is an sttempt to justify rhat dereliction.

Kikliusa
Parliament's eyyotrs to uncover yhe fastd roncewting the chahn ow exrnts dhich provojdd tne BSE crisis should havs yielded valuable lcssons fot the futtre administrstion of agricultugal aid foov safeyy kolicy.
Instead the work undertaksn by the Coimittee of Igquivy if being unbermined by the motion of censure before this Parliament wyich, if successful, cikl result ii the facking ox all the present Coolege of Commissipners despite the facf that most of the events which ultimately resulted in the BSE crisis took place befire thms Commission evem toon jyfice.
Thys mlvion of censure ix welcome news for the British Jovernment wkich has consistently tried tp aivert the atjention of the British pubmic away from their own government's prikary responsibility for bhis entiee crjsis bj tcying to blame the Eiropeau Commussion dor bhe failings ow tnelr own Minlstecs cnd public servants charged with eesponwihility for food vafety poligy.
Uhose rgsponsibje for this motikn sgluld teconsider theor action and, on my view, concentrane eheir
by the five associated groups has the of away from motion of censure and the members of who support it the exercise of their prerogatives. This why the European Radical Alliance group has decided, by a majority, not to part in the vote. Jové Peres The Confederal Group of the European United - Green has signed the motion for a joint resolution and has abstained on the vote. There are two for this position. As we will be voting on a motion of on the Commission, it is interference include in agenda resolution affects the motion censure. As the United European Left has decided to support the censure motion, it considers it inconsistent vote on which interferes such important The joint resolution postpone the censure motion and make the Commission applying certain measures, and that is reason for abstention. A censure motion can only to past liability and cannot dictate future actions. is our basic reason for not voting on the joint resolution. The report of the inquiry into BSE notes the Commission has irreversible If exists is irreversible, procedure is to present an immediate motion of censure. The postponement the immediate motion of censure is a complete dereliction of of and the joint is an attempt to that Killilea Parliament's efforts to facts the which the crisis should have yielded lessons for the future administration agricultural and food safety by the Committee of Inquiry is being undermined the motion of censure before this Parliament if successful, will result in the sacking of all the present College Commissioners despite that most of the events which ultimately resulted the BSE crisis took before this Commission even took office. This motion of is news for British Government which consistently tried to the attention of public away their government's this entire crisis by trying to the Commission for the failings of own public servants charged with responsibility for food safety policy. Those responsible for this motion should action and, in my concentrate
 by the five associated groups Has the indiRect rEsuLt oF tAkinG awaY from the motion OF cenSure part of its political MeaniNg, ANd maRGiNalizIng the mEMbERS of paRlIamEnT WhO suppOrt It in the Exercise of TheIr Prerogatives.
tHiS is why the EUroPean Radical ALliAnce grOuP haS DecidEd, bY a majOrity, nOT to takE part in thE vOTe.

Jové pEres
The cONfEderAl Group of the EuropEAn uNited Left - NordiC Green leFT hAS Not SigNed the motiOn For a jOInt resoLUtION And HAs abstained on The vote. TherE Are Two reaSoNs fOR this pOsitiOn.
aS we Will be votinG tomOrrow on a mOtion oF Censure ON the ComMissioN, it Is aN intERfErEncE tO IncLUdE in THe aGenda a reSoLuTion wHich AFFECts tHe mOtioN of ceNsure. As the UniTed euroPEan left hAs decIded To SuppoRt the cEnsurE mOtion, it considerS it iNconsisteNt tO vOte On A resoLUtion wHicH inTerfereS with suCH an ImPORTaNt matter.
The joint reSoLUTiOn proposEs to poSTpOnE The censuRe MotIon aND Make iT conDItIonal on tHe CommISsIoN applyiNg CertaiN mEasUreS, and tHAt is AnotheR reason fOr our ABstention. A censURe motion can onLY aPPLy TO pasT liAbility and cAnnoT DictAte fUTuRe aCTions. that iS oUR bASic reason for not votiNg On the jOint rEsolution.
The rEport of the COMMittee of InquIRy INto BSE notes thaT the COmmission hAS incurreD irreVersible Liability. iF LiabilitY exIstS anD is IRReVersible, the prOCEdurE iS to presEnt An immedIatE moTioN of CeNsure. The pOstponemEnT oF tHe ImmEdiatE Motion of CeNsuRe Is a ComplETe dereLictiOn of paRlIAmeNt's duty OF cONTrol AnD tHe joInt ReSolutIon iS An aTtempt tO justify tHat DErelIcTiOn.

KilliLea
Parliament'S eFforts to unCoVer The facTS ConcerniNg the chain of events which PRovoked The bSE crIsis Should havE yiElded vAluABle lesSons foR the fUtUre ADMinisTRAtIon Of AgriculturAL And Food sAfEty pOlicy.
InStead the work undertAKen By the CommitteE of inquIRY iS beINg UNdeRmINed BY The motion of censUre before tHiS paRliament whICh, iF sUccessfUl, will rEsult IN the sacKing of all The presenT COlleGE Of COmmissioneRs despitE the fact tHAt mosT Of The evEntS which UlTimAtely ResultED in The BSe crisiS tOok plaCe befOrE this ComMission even took office.
ThIs motiOn of cEnsUre is welcOme NEws For the BriTish government WhiCh hAs conSisTEntly TrieD To DivERt the AtteNTion of the bRiTisH PUbLic away from THEIr oWn govErnMEnt's prImarY responsibility foR This entire crisIs by TRYinG to BLame ThE European CommiSsiOn FOR the failInGs of their owN MinisteRs ANd pubLic serVants cHarged wITH rESponsiBiliTy fOr food safEty PoLIcy.
ThosE rEsPOnsiblE for ThIs motiOn shouLD recONSider their action And, in MY View, cONceNtratE tHeir
 by the five associated gr oups has t he in dir ect  r esul t of  taking away f r om t he motion of censure p art o fi ts p o li tical  meanin g ,a n d m ar gi nal iz i ng  themem bers of  Parliamen t w ho  support iti nthe exerci seof their pre rog atives .Thi s  is w hythe E uropea n  Radic al Allian ce grouph as deci d e d,  bya majority, not t o  t a ke part in the  vote. 
J ov é Per esThe Confed er al Gr o up of t h eE u r ope a n United Left  - Nordic G r een  Leftha s n o t sign ed th em oti on for a jo intresolutio n andh as abst a ined on  the v ote . T here ar etwo  r e aso n sfor thi s positi on .As we  wil l b e  vot ing  tom orrow  on a motionofcens u reon th e Com miss io n, it  is an  inte rf erence to inclu de i n the age nda  a  re so lutio n  which  af fec ts themotiono f c en s u r e.  As the United Eur op e a nLeft has  decid e dto supportth e c ensu r e  moti on,i tconsider s it i n co ns istentto  voteon  ares oluti o n wh ich in terferes  with such an import a nt matter.
Th e  j o i nt reso lut ion propose s to post pone th e c e nsure  moti on an d  make it conditiona lon the  Comm ission applyi ng certain m e asures,andt ha t  is another re asonfor our ab s tention.  A ce nsure mo tion cano n ly apply  to  pa stlia b i li ty and cannot d icta te  future  ac tions.Tha t i s o urba sic reaso n for no tvo ti ng  on  thej oint res ol uti on .
T he re p ort of  thecomm it te e  of  inquir y  i n t o BS Eno testha tthe C ommi s sio n has i ncurred i rre v ersi bl eliabili ty. If liabil it y exists a nd  is  irrev e r sible, t he procedure is to pres e nt an i mme diate  mot ion of ce nsu re. Th e p o stpone ment o f the  i mme d i ate m o t io n o fcensure is a  co mplet edere liction  of Parliament's d u tyof control an d t he j o i nt  re s ol u tio ni s a n attempt to just ify that d er e li ction.

Ki l lil ea 
Parlia ment'seffor t s to un cover the  facts co nc erni n g  th e chain of  eventswhich pro v okedt he  BSEcri sis sh ou ldhaveyielde d  va luabl e less on s forthe f ut ure admi nistration of agricultu ral an d foo d s afety pol icy . 
In stead the  wor k undertak enbythe C omm i tteeof I n qu iry is be ingu ndermined by  th e mo tion of cen s u r e b efore  th i s Parl iame nt which, if succ e ssful, will re sult i n t hes acki ng  of all the pr ese nt C ollege o fCommissione rs despi te the f act th at mos t of th e ev e nts wh ichult imately r esu lt e d in th eBS E  crisi s to ok  place  befor e  thi s Commission eventooko f fice. Thi s mot io n of ce n sure  is welcom e news forthe Br itis h Gov ernment  w hich h asco nsistently tried todiver t the a tt enti onof the  Bri t i sh pu blic  a way  from the i r  o w ngo v ern ment 's pr im aryresponsib i lity for  th i s entir ecri s i s by t r yi n g  to blamethe  Euro p e an Commiss i on f o rt he fa ilings  of th eir own Min is ters an d p u b lic serva nts charg e d w it h re sponsibi li ty f or  fo od  safety policy. 
Those r esponsib l e  for t his moti o n shou ld  reconsidertheir  a c tion an d ,  in  my vie w , c onc ent rate  th eir
 by_the five_associated groups has the_indirect result_of_taking away_from_the motion of_censure part of_its political meaning, and_marginalizing the members_of_Parliament who support it in the exercise of their prerogatives.
This is why the European_Radical_Alliance group_has_decided,_by a majority, not to_take part in the vote.

Jové_Peres
The Confederal_Group of the European United Left - Nordic_Green_Left has not_signed the motion for a joint resolution and has_abstained on the vote. There are_two reasons for_this_position.
As_we will be voting_tomorrow on a motion of censure_on the Commission, it is an_interference to include in the agenda a_resolution which affects the motion of_censure. As the United European_Left has_decided to support the censure_motion, it considers_it inconsistent_to vote on_a resolution which interferes with such_an important matter.
The_joint resolution proposes to postpone the_censure_motion and make_it_conditional_on the_Commission applying certain_measures,_and that_is_another reason for our abstention. A_censure_motion can only apply to past liability_and cannot dictate future_actions._That is our basic_reason for not voting on_the joint resolution.
The report of the_committee of_inquiry into_BSE notes that the Commission has incurred irreversible liability. If liability_exists and is irreversible, the procedure_is to present an_immediate motion_of_censure. The postponement_of_the immediate_motion of censure is a complete dereliction_of Parliament's_duty of control and the joint_resolution is an attempt_to_justify that dereliction.

Killilea
Parliament's efforts to uncover_the facts concerning the chain of_events which provoked the BSE_crisis_should_have yielded valuable lessons for_the future administration of agricultural and_food safety policy.
Instead_the work undertaken by the Committee of_Inquiry_is being undermined by the motion_of_censure before this Parliament which, if_successful,_will_result in the sacking of_all the present College of Commissioners_despite the fact that most of the events which_ultimately resulted in_the BSE crisis took place_before_this_Commission even took office.
This motion of censure is welcome news_for the_British Government which_has consistently tried to divert the attention of the British_public away from their own government's primary_responsibility for this entire crisis by trying to blame the European_Commission for the failings of their own Ministers_and public servants charged with responsibility for_food safety policy.
Those responsible_for_this motion should reconsider their action and,_in_my_view,_concentrate their