  Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000
electronic Transaction Documents in summary form similar to the data being
provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant.  [We propose that
the Commission defer requesting production of other information until it has
reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant proportion of
their energy into the California market.  At that time a more accurate
assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will be valuable
given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the California
wholesale market.]

[Alternate ending to paragraph:   We propose for the voluminous Portland
General generating cost and maintenance data, that these documents be made
available in Portland for inspection from a representative sampling of
facilities.  If there are specific documents that the Commission would like
copied from that production, we can discuss the arrangements for producing
these documents.  We propose to make these documents available in Portland
in a third wave of document productions]

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of transaction data
for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty,
quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is a purchase or a
sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this information, it is
possible that some entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those
transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
business.  EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more
limited role in the wholesale markets which are the subject of the
Commission investigation.  However, EES can also provide similar electronic
Transaction Data with the proviso that it will not include the specific
names of its retail customers but instead will provide a blind customer
number.  This additional restriction is important to EES because many of
EES's
Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 
 electronic Transaction Documents in summary human body exchangeable to the data being 
 provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant.   [ We aim that 
 the Commission defer requesting output of early information until it has 
 reviewed the information of generators who sell a meaning proportion of 
 their energy into the California market.   At that time a more accurate 
 appraisal can be made of whether this enormous effort will be valuable 
 given the limited impact of Portland General coevals on the California 
 wholesale market. ] 

 [ Alternate ending to paragraph:    We nominate for the voluminous Portland 
 General generating cost and maintenance datum, that these documents be induce 
 available in Portland for inspection from a representative sampling of 
 facilities.   If there are specific document that the Commission would like 
 copied from that production, we can discuss the arrangements for producing 
 these documents.   We propose to make these documents available in Portland 
 in a third wave of document productions ] 

 TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS 
 Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19 

  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for 
 the purchase and sale of department of energy deliver in California from the ISO and PX. 
 EPMI can provide the Commission respective unlike sets of transaction data 
 for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for 
 the purchase and sale of department of energy delivered with the date, counterparty, 
 measure, delivery point, hours, monetary value, and whether it is a purchase or a 
 sale.    Because of the speed with which you want this information, it is 
 possible that some entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.   For those 
 transaction where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we 
 understand that the ISO will show function of the transaction, but there will 
 not be a comparable transaction in the EPMI datum we can leave quickly. 
 The reason is that this type of transaction is pass through to EPMI's 
 customer on an accounting system rather than as character of the trading 
 business.   EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more 
 limited character in the wholesale markets which are the discipline of the 
 Commission investigation.   However, EES can besides provide similar electronic 
 Transaction Data with the proviso that it will not include the specific 
 name of its retail customers but instead will leave a blind customer 
 issue.   This additional restriction is important to EES because many of 
 EES's
  Nfvertheless, Portland Gentral proposes to krivide hor yead 2000
electrunic Transaction Documents ii sunmary form similar to the dxta being
irovided vy ouher Enron Entitixa, to thc extskt renxvant.  [We propoxe that
the Commission dexef xequesting production of other inforiation inhil it has
revigwed uhe infkgmction of generators who sell a aignifibant proportion og
their energy into the Callforjia market.  At thah time a mots asxurate
assessoent can bt kade of whgther this enormous effort will ce vakuable
giveb rhe nimited impect of Portland Gekvral geteratiom on the Califprnma
whilesale market.]

[Alternave ending to paragrakh:   We prmpkse for the volumunius Pmrtldnd
Gdberxl feierzting fosv and maintsnance data, that these documenus fv made
availabme in [owtland for inspection from a representauive aampling of
facilities.  Uf there are specific documentf that the Commission would like
copied from that [rodurtkon, wc cav dlscuss the arrangements for producing
these doshmtntx.  We propose bo make these docukejtx available in Portlchd
jn a third wave of documegt priductions]

URANSSCTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We unberwtand that the Comlission wilu be obtaoning trading data for
tke purdhase and swle of ensfgy delivered in Cakixornia from the ISO and PX.
QPMI can 'rovibe the Cummixsion feveral divferekd sets of transactlon dcta
fos year 2000 (in California and outside of Calihprnia and Resl Tike) for
thz purcmase and sale os energy delivgred with the aate, countvrparty,
quentity, delivqry point, housd, price, and xhether ie is a pyrchase ur a
sale.   Becsuse of tkt speed wirh which you want bhis khformation, it iw
powsible that somr evtryed xill fa incomplete or knazvuratd.  For ukosc
trxnsavtions where EPMI sesved only as the schedillng coordunator, wq
understand tnat the ISO will sjow pert of the yragsaction, but there will
not be z corresplndlng transactijn ik thg EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is thet this type of transacrion is passed throogh to EPMI's
cuxtomew on an awcounting system ratyer than as part pf the trading
businesa.  EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more
limited role in the wyolesale markets wgich are nhe xubjece of vhe
Commission invvstigation.  However, EES can also provide snmilar electronic
Transaction Caga with the ptoviso that it will not indlude thr specific
names of its retail cistomers but instead wilk providw a bmind clatumer
number.  This acditioual rewtrictiin id important tu ERS because lany oy
EES's
Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for electronic Documents in form similar to other Entities, to the relevant. [We propose the Commission defer requesting production of information until it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant of their energy into the California market. At that time a more accurate can made whether enormous effort will be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the California market.] [Alternate ending to paragraph: We propose for voluminous Portland General generating and maintenance data, that these be available in for from representative sampling of If there are specific documents that the Commission would like copied from that production, we can discuss arrangements for documents. We to these available in Portland third wave of document productions] TRANSACTION 15, 16, 17 and 19 We understand that Commission will obtaining trading data for the purchase sale of energy delivered in California from the and PX. EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of transaction data for year California and outside of and Real Time) the and of delivered with date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is purchase or a sale. Because of the speed with which this it is possible some entries will be or For those transactions where only the understand the will show part of transaction, but there will not a corresponding transaction in provide quickly. The reason is that this type transaction is passed through to EPMI's customer an accounting system rather than as part of the trading business. EES a retail electricity, and plays a far more limited role the wholesale markets which the subject of the Commission investigation. However, EES can provide electronic Transaction with the proviso it will not the specific names retail customers instead provide number. This additional restriction is important EES many of EES's
  Nevertheless, Portland GenerAl proposes To proVidE foR yEar 2000
eLectRonic TransactiON DocUments in summary form simIlar tO tHE datA BeIng
prOvided bY OtHER EnRoN ENtiTiES, tO the eXteNt relevAnt.  [We propoSe tHaT
the CommissiON dEfer requesTinG production oF otHer infOrMatIOn untIl iT has
rEvieweD The infOrmation oF gENeratoRS who selL A SiGnifIcant proportion of
THeIR energy into the califoRnIA mARKet.  at tHat time a moRe AccurATe
assesSMeNT CAn bE Made of whether This enormouS EffOrt wilL bE vaLUable
gIven tHe LImiTed impact of portLand GenerAl geneRAtion on THe CalifOrnia
wHolEsaLe maRKeT.]

[ALteRnATe eNDiNg tO ParAgraph:   We PrOpOse foR the VOLUMinoUs POrtlAnd
GeNeral generatiNg cOst aND maIntenAnce dAta, tHaT thesE documEnts bE mAde
available in POrtlAnd for insPecTiOn fRoM a repREsentaTivE saMpling oF
faciliTIes.  if THERe Are specific documenTs THAt The CommiSsion wOUlD lIKe
copied FrOm tHat pRODuctiOn, we CAn Discuss tHe arraNGeMeNts for pRoDucing
ThEse DocUmentS.  we prOpose tO make theSe docUMents available IN Portland
in a tHIrD WAvE Of doCumEnt productiOns]

TraNSAcTIOn dOcUMenTS
ReQuestS 13, 15, 16, 17 aND 19

 WE Understand that the CoMmIssion Will bE obtaining traDing data foR
THE purchasE and SAlE Of energy deliveRed in california FRom the ISo and Px.
EPMI can Provide thE cOmmissioN seVerAl dIffEREnT sets of transaCTIon dAtA
for yeaR 2000 (in califorNia And OutSidE oF CalifornIa and ReaL TImE) fOr
The PurchASe and salE oF enErGy dEliveREd with The daTe, coUnTeRParTy,
quantITy, DELiveRy PoInt, hOurS, pRice, aNd whETheR it is a pUrchase or A
saLE.   BecAuSe Of the spEed with which yOu Want this inFoRmaTion, it IS
Possible That some entries will be inCOmplete Or iNaccuRate.  for those
tRanSactioNs wHEre EPMi serveD only As The SCHedulING cOorDiNator, we
undERStaNd thaT tHe ISo will shOw part of the transacTIon, But there will
nOt bE a coRREsPonDInG TraNsACtiON In the EPMI data we Can provide QuICkLy.
The reasoN Is tHaT this tyPe of traNsactIOn is pasSed througH to EPMI's
cUsTomeR ON an Accounting System raTher than aS Part oF ThE tradIng
BusineSs.  eES Is a reTail prOVidEr of eLectriCiTy, and pLays a FaR more
limIted role in the wholesale mArkets Which Are The subjecT of THe
COmmission InveStigation.  HOweVer, eES caN alSO provIde sIMiLar ELectrOnic
tRansactioN daTa wITH tHe proviso thAT IT wiLl not IncLUde the SpecIfic
names of its retAIl customers but InstEAD wiLl pROvidE a Blind customer
nUmbEr.  tHIs additiOnAl restrictiOn is impoRtANt to EeS becaUse manY of
EES's
  Nevertheless, Portland G eneral pro poses  to  pr ov ideforyear 2000
elec t roni c Transaction Document s insu m mary fo rm si milar t o  t h e  da ta  b ein gp ro vided  by  otherEnron Enti tie s,  to the exte n trelevant. [W e propose th atthe Co mm iss i on de fer  requ esting produc tion of o th e r info r mationu n ti l it  has
reviewed the in f ormation of ge nerato rs wh o sel l a  significa nt  prop o rtion o f 
t h e i r e n ergy into the  California mar ket. At  th a t time  a mo re acc urate
asses smen t can bemade o f  whethe r  this e normou s e ffo rt w i ll  b e v al u abl e 
g ive n  th e limite dim pactof P o r t l andGen eral  gene ration on the  Ca lifo r nia 
whol esale  mar ke t.]
[Alter nateen ding to paragra ph:  We prop ose  f orth e vol u minous  Po rtl and
Gen eral ge n era ti n g co st and maintenance  d a t a,  that th ese do c um en t s be mad eava ilab l e  in P ortl a nd  for ins pectio n  f ro m a rep re sentat iv e s amp lingo f
fa ciliti es.  Ifthere are specific d o cuments thatt he C om m issi onwould likecopi e d fr om t h at  pr o ducti on, w ec an discuss the arrange me nts fo r pro ducing
thesedocuments. W e propos e to ma k e these docume nts a vailable i n  Portlan d
ina thirdwave of d o c ument pr odu cti ons ]
T R AN SACTION DOCUM E N TS
R eq uests 1 3,15, 16,  17  an d 1 9
 W e underst and that  t he  C om mis sionw ill be o bt ain in g t radin g  datafor
t he p ur ch a seand sal e  o f ener gy  d eliv ere din Ca lifo r nia  from t he ISO an d P X .
EP MI  c an prov ide the Commi ss ion severa ldif ferent s ets of t ransaction data
for yea r  2000 ( inCalif orni a and out sid e of C ali f orniaand Re al Ti me ) f o r 
thep u rc has eand sale o f ene rgy d el iver ed with  the date, counter p art y,
quantity,del iver y po int ,  h o urs ,p ric e ,  and whether it  is a purc ha s eor a
sale.   B ec ause of  the sp eed w i th whic h you wan t this in fo rmat i o n,it is
poss ible tha t some en t riesw il l beinc omplet eorinacc urate.  Fo r tho se
tra ns action s whe re  EPMI se rved only as the schedu ling c oordi nat or, we
un der s tan d that th e IS O will sho w p art  of t het ransa ctio n ,but there  wil l 
not be a co rre s p on ding transa c t i onin th e E P MI dat a we  can provide quic k ly.
The reason  ist h atthi s  typ eof transaction  is  p a s sed thro ug h to EPMI's 
custome ro n anaccoun ting s ystem r a t he r  thanas p art  of the t rad in g 
busine ss .EES is  a r et ail pr ovider of e l e ctricity, and pl ays a f ar mo r e
l imite drole in thewholesalemarkets whi ch are  the  subj ect ofth e
Comm iss io n investig a tion.  Ho wever , EES c an  als o p rovide  sim i l ar el ectr on icTransacti o n  D a ta  w i ththeprovi so  tha t it will not incl ude the spe ci fic n ames o f  i t s  retail cu sto mersb u t insteadw illp ro v ide a  blind  custo mer
num b er.  This ad dit i o nal restr iction is imp or tant  to EESbe caus eman yof
EES's
 _Nevertheless, Portland_General proposes to provide_for year_2000
electronic_Transaction Documents_in_summary form similar_to the data_being
provided by other Enron_Entities, to the_extent_relevant.  [We propose that
the Commission defer requesting production of other information until it_has
reviewed_the information_of_generators_who sell a significant proportion_of
their energy into the California_market. _At that time a more accurate
assessment can be_made_of whether this_enormous effort will be valuable
given the limited impact of_Portland General generation on the California
wholesale_market.]

[Alternate ending to_paragraph:__ We propose for_the voluminous Portland
General generating cost and_maintenance data, that these documents be_made
available in Portland for inspection from a_representative sampling of
facilities.  If there_are specific documents that the_Commission would_like
copied from that production, we_can discuss the_arrangements for_producing
these documents. _We propose to make these documents_available in Portland
in_a third wave of document productions]

TRANSACTION_DOCUMENTS
Requests_13, 15, 16,_17_and_19

 We_understand that the_Commission_will be_obtaining_trading data for
the purchase and sale_of_energy delivered in California from the ISO_and PX.
EPMI can provide_the_Commission several different sets_of transaction data
for year 2000_(in California and outside of California_and Real_Time) for
the_purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty,
quantity, delivery_point, hours, price, and whether it_is a purchase or_a
sale. __Because of the_speed_with which_you want this information, it is
possible that_some entries_will be incomplete or inaccurate. _For those
transactions where EPMI_served_only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand_that the ISO will show part_of the transaction, but there_will
not_be_a corresponding transaction in the_EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The_reason is that_this type of transaction is passed through_to_EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather_than_as part of the trading
business. _EES_is_a retail provider of electricity,_and plays a far more
limited role_in the wholesale markets which are the subject of_the
Commission investigation. _However, EES can also provide_similar_electronic
Transaction_Data with the proviso that it will not include the_specific
names of_its retail customers_but instead will provide a blind customer
number.  This additional_restriction is important to EES because many_of
EES's