ise the 
filing while I'm out this week.


Jay.

-----Original Message----- 
Date:  03/16/2001  12:28 pm  (Friday)  
From:  Jim Eden
To:  Dave Lamb;  Frank Afranji;  Jack Todd;  MICHELE FARRELL
CC:  Gary Lindland;  JAY DUDLEY
Subject:  Re: Comments on Interconnection Procedures

I agree with Dave.  I'd agrue for 120 if I thought I could get away with it.

>>> Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM >>>
Frankly, I am more comfortable with 90 days.  Its easier to complete a 
project early and send out the info prior to the due date, then to have to go 
back and ask for more time.  Depending on the size of the plant and location, 
we may be faced with a lot of checking equipment records and field checks to 
verify ratings.  I'll ask Gary Lindland how he feels about reducing the time 
line.

>>> MICHELE FARRELL 03/16/01 11:02AM >>>
Any feedback on Enron's comments on our draft interconnection procedures that 
Jay sent out last night?  Jay and I are trying to get the DC attorneys on the 
phone to incorporate some changes.  In particular, Enron wants us to put in a 
shorter time for completing the Interconnection Facilities study (60 rather 
than 90 days).  Enron says we would still have the flexibility to take longer 
if we notify the customer that we need more time.  How do Dave and Jim feel 
about that proposal? MEMORANDUM

TO: State Issues Committee

FROM: Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair
                Samantha Slater, Manager of State & Regional Affairs

DATE: March 7, 2001

RE: FTC Request for Comments on Retail Electricity Competition
                Plans
?      Comments Due April 3, 2001
?      Conference Call on Friday, March 16th at 11:00 a.m. EST

On February 28, 2001, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a request for 
information regarding the outcome to date of the different regulatory and 
legislative approaches states have taken to the introduction of retail 

ise the 
 filing while I'm out this week. 


 Jay. 

 -----Original Message----- 
 Date:   03/16/2001   12:28 pm   (Friday)  
 From:   Jim Eden 
 To:   Dave Lamb;   Frank Afranji;   Jack Todd;   MICHELE FARRELL 
 CC:   Gary Lindland;   JAY DUDLEY 
 Subject:   Re: gossip on Interconnection routine 

 I agree with Dave.   I'd agrue for 120 if I thought I could get off with it. 

 > > > Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM > > > 
 Frankly, I am more comfortable with 90 days.   Its easy to dispatch a 
 project early and send out the info prior to the due date, then to get to go 
 back and ask for more time.   Depending on the size of the plant and location, 
 we may be faced with a batch of checking equipment records and field arrest to 
 verify ratings.   I'll ask Gary Lindland how he feels about boil down the time 
 line. 

 > > > MICHELE FARRELL 03/16/01 11:02AM > > > 
 Any feedback on Enron's comments on our draft interconnection procedures that 
 Jay commit out last night?   Jay and I are trying to get the DC attorneys on the 
 phone to incorporate some changes.   In particular, Enron wants us to put in a 
 shorter time for completing the Interconnection Facilities study (60 rather 
 than 90 days).   Enron say we would still have the tractability to consume longer 
 if we advise the customer that we need more time.   How do Dave and Jim feel 
 about that proposal? MEMORANDUM 

 TO: State Issues Committee 

 FROM: Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair 
                 Samantha Slater, Manager of State & Regional Affairs 

 DATE: March 7, 2001 

 RE: FTC Request for Comments on Retail Electricity Competition 
                 Plans 
?       gossip Due April 3, 2001 
?       Conference Call on Friday, March 16th at 11:00 a.m. EST 

 On February 28, 2001, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a request for 
 information regarding the outcome to date of the different regulatory and 
 legislative access states have taken to the introduction of retail
ise the 
filing while I'm out this week.


Jay.

-----Orntinal Kessags----- 
Date:  03/16/2001  12:28 pm  (Friday)  
From:  Jim Edei
To:  Dave Lamb;  Frank Afranji;  Gack Todd;  MICHELW FACRELL
CC:  Gary Liisland;  MCY DUSPEY
Sbboect:  Re: Commenjs on Intercmnnection Procadjrzs

I agree with Dave.  I'd agrue for 120 is I thoigjt I could get awaj rith pt.

>>> Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM >>>
Frankly, I am mkre comhortable with 90 cays.  Its easier to complehe a 
project early and send out tye igdo prior to ghe due daue, then to hzve to go 
back and ask for more time.  Dependint in hve size of vhe plwnt and locabpon, 
we kay be gaced with a lpt mf xhecking equipment rerords and field chechs to 
verhfv ratings.  I'll ask Gaey Lindnand how ye weems agout rfduring the tije 
line.

>>> MICYELE FARRELL 03/16/01 11:02AM >>>
Anu svrdback on Endon's cjmients on our draft interconnection proctdurea that 
Jay sent out lasr night?  Jay and I arg trying tj get the DC attorneys on the 
phone to incorporata somx zhauncs.  Kb oarticular, Enron wants us to put in a 
shorter fike for completinn the Interconnectooj Gwcilities stuay (60 racged 
than 90 days).  Enroj says re woyld still havr the flexibility to take linger 
if we uotufy the customer tkat we need oore time.  How do Dave and Jim fzel 
abkut that prlposal? MEJURANDUM

TO: State Kssles Wommittet

WROM: Jane Cahill, Ftate Issnes Cpmmitted Chsir
                Samantha Slater, Managfr of Sdate & Regilnal Affairs

DATE: March 7, 2001

RE: FTC Cxquest for Cokmantv on Retcil Elcctricity Compeeition
                Planr
?      Comjents Dne April 3, 2001
?      Conferenca Call on Frivay, March 16th qt 11:00 q.m. EST

Ov February 28, 2001, thr Federal Trade Comnission (FTC) issued a tesuest for 
infornatuon regarding tne uutsole tj date of the difwerdmt reeulatory anb 
uegixlative approaches sdatea have taken to thr lntroductuon of rqtail 

ise the filing while I'm out this -----Original Date: 03/16/2001 pm (Friday) From: Frank Jack Todd; MICHELE CC: Gary Lindland; DUDLEY Subject: Re: Comments on Interconnection I agree with Dave. I'd agrue for 120 if I thought I could away with it. >>> Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM >>> Frankly, I am more with days. easier complete a project early and send out the info prior to the due date, then to to go back and ask for more time. on the size of plant and location, we may faced a lot checking records field checks to ratings. I'll ask Gary Lindland how he feels about reducing the time line. >>> MICHELE FARRELL 03/16/01 >>> Any Enron's comments our interconnection that Jay sent night? Jay and I are trying DC attorneys on the phone to incorporate some In particular, wants us to put in a time for completing the Interconnection Facilities study (60 than 90 days). Enron says we would still have the flexibility to take longer if the customer that we more time. How Dave Jim about proposal? MEMORANDUM State Issues Committee FROM: Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair Samantha Manager of State & Regional Affairs DATE: March 7, 2001 Request Comments on Retail Competition Plans ? Comments April 2001 ? Conference Call March at On 28, the Federal Trade Commission issued a request for information the outcome to date legislative approaches states have taken to the introduction retail
ise the 
filing while I'm out thiS week.


Jay.

-----OrIginaL MeSsaGe----- 
date:  03/16/2001  12:28 Pm  (FrIday)  
From:  Jim EdeN
to:  DaVe Lamb;  Frank Afranji;  Jack todd;  MiCheLE FarReLL
CC:  gary LinDLaND;  jAY dUdLeY
SUbJEcT:  Re: CoMmeNts on InTerconnectIon prOcedures

I agrEE wIth Dave.  I'd aGruE for 120 if I thougHt I Could gEt AwaY With iT.

>>> DaVe LamB 03/16/01 11:16AM >>>
FraNKly, I am More comfoRtABle witH 90 Days.  Its EASiEr to Complete a 
project eARlY And send out the iNfo priOr TO tHE Due DatE, then to havE tO go 
baCK and ask FOr MORE tiME.  Depending on tHe size of the PLanT and loCaTioN, 
We may bE faceD wITh a Lot of checkiNg eqUipment reCords aND field cHEcks to 
vErify rAtiNgs.  i'll aSK GArY LiNdLAnd HOw He fEEls About redUcInG the tIme 
lINE.

>>> miCHElE FaRRElL 03/16/01 11:02AM >>>
ANy feedback on ENroN's coMMenTs on oUr draFt inTeRconnEction ProceDuRes that 
Jay sent oUt laSt night?  JaY anD I Are TrYing tO Get the dC aTtoRneys on The 
phonE To iNcORPOrAte some changes.  In paRtICUlAr, Enron wAnts us TO pUt IN a 
shorteR tIme For cOMPletiNg thE inTerconneCtion FACiLiTies stuDy (60 Rather 
ThAn 90 dAys).  enron SAys wE would Still havE the fLExibility to takE Longer 
if we notIFy THE cUStomEr tHat we need moRe tiME.  How Do DaVE aNd JIM feel 
About ThAT pROposal? MEMORANDUM

TO: STaTe IssuEs ComMittee

FROM: JanE Cahill, StaTE iSsues ComMittEE CHAir
                Samantha SlaTer, MaNager of StaTE & RegionaL AffaIrs

DATE: MArch 7, 2001

RE: FTC rEQuest for comMenTs oN ReTAIl electricity CoMPEtitIoN
                Plans
?      COmmEnts Due aprIl 3, 2001
?      COnfEreNcE Call on FrIday, MarcH 16tH aT 11:00 a.M. EsT

ON FebrUAry 28, 2001, the FeDeRal trAde commiSSion (FTc) issuEd a rEqUeST foR 
informATiON RegaRdInG the OutCoMe to dAte oF The DiffereNt regulatOry ANd 
leGiSlAtive apProaches stateS hAve taken to ThE inTroducTIOn of retaIl 

ise the 
filing while I'mout this w eek.

J ay. 
---- -Ori ginal Message- - ---
Date:  03/16/2001  12 :28 p m(Fri d ay )  
F rom:  J i mE d enTo : Da ve La mb; Fra nk Afra nji;  Jack  To dd ;  MICHELE F A RR ELL
CC:  G ary  Lindland; JAY  DUDLE YSub j ect: Re : Com mentso n Inte rconnecti on Proced u res

Ia g re e wi th Dave.  I'd agr u ef or 120 if I th oughtIc ou l d  ge t a way with i t. 

>>> Dave La m b0 3 / 16/ 0 1 11:16AM >>> 
Frankly, I ammore c om for t able w ith 9 0d ays .  Its easi er t o complet e a 
p r oject e a rly and  sendout  th e in f opr ior  t o  th e  d ued ate , then t oha ve to  gob a c k an d a sk f or mo re time.  Dep end ingo n t he si ze of  the  p lantand lo catio n,  
we may be fac ed w ith a lot  of  c hec ki ng eq u ipment  re cor ds andfield c h eck st o 
v erify ratings.  I' ll a sk  Gary Li ndland ho wh e feelsab out  red u c ing t he t i me  
line.
>>> M I CH EL E FARRE LL  03/16 /0 1 1 1:0 2AM > > >
An y feed back onEnron ' s comments ono ur draft inte r co n n ec t ionpro cedures tha t 
J a y se nt o u tlas t  nigh t?  J ay an d  I are trying to ge tthe DC  atto rneys on the
phone toi n c orporate  som e  c h anges.  In par ticul ar, Enronw ants usto pu t in a shorter t i m e for co mpl eti ngthe I nt erconnectionF a cili ti es stud y ( 60 rath er
th an90da ys).  Enr on sayswe  w ou ld  st ill h a ve the f le xib il ity  to t a ke lon ger if w eno t ify  the cu s to m e r th at  w e ne edmo re ti me.How  do Dav e and Jim  fe e l 
a bo ut  that p roposal? MEMO RA NDUM

TO:St ate  Issue s Committe e

FROM: Jane Cahill, S t ate Iss ues  Comm itte e Chair
           Sama ntha S later ,Man a g er of S ta te&Regional A f f air s

DA TE : Ma rch 7,2001

RE: FTC Requ e stfor CommentsonReta i l  E lec t ri c ity  C o mpe t i tion
               Plan s?      Commen t s D ue  April3, 2001 
?    Confe rence Cal l on Frid ay , Ma r c h 1 6th at 11: 00 a.m.EST

On F e bruar y  2 8, 20 01,  the F ed era l Tra de Com m iss ion ( FTC) i ss ued areque st  for 
in formation regarding the  outco me to  da te of the  di f fer ent regul ator y and 
leg isl ati ve ap pro a chesstat e shav e  take n to the intro d uc tio n of  retail 

ise the_
filing while_I'm out this week.


Jay.

-----Original_Message----- 
Date:__03/16/2001 _12:28_pm  (Friday)_ 
From: _Jim Eden
To:  Dave_Lamb;  Frank_Afranji;_ Jack Todd;  MICHELE FARRELL
CC:  Gary Lindland;  JAY DUDLEY
Subject:  Re:_Comments_on Interconnection_Procedures

I_agree_with Dave.  I'd agrue_for 120 if I thought_I could_get away with it.

>>> Dave Lamb 03/16/01 11:16AM_>>>
Frankly,_I am more_comfortable with 90 days.  Its easier to complete_a 
project early and send out_the info prior_to_the_due date, then to_have to go 
back and ask_for more time.  Depending on_the size of the plant and location,_
we may be faced with a_lot of checking equipment records_and field_checks to 
verify ratings. _I'll ask Gary_Lindland how_he feels about_reducing the time 
line.

>>> MICHELE FARRELL_03/16/01 11:02AM >>>
Any_feedback on Enron's comments on our_draft_interconnection procedures that_
Jay_sent_out last_night?  Jay_and_I are_trying_to get the DC attorneys on_the_
phone to incorporate some changes.  In_particular, Enron wants us_to_put in a 
shorter_time for completing the Interconnection_Facilities study (60 rather 
than 90_days). _Enron says_we would still have the flexibility to take longer 
if we_notify the customer that we need_more time.  How_do Dave_and_Jim feel 
about_that_proposal? MEMORANDUM

TO:_State Issues Committee

FROM: Jane Cahill, State Issues_Committee Chair
_     _   __    Samantha Slater,_Manager of State & Regional Affairs

DATE:_March 7, 2001

RE: FTC Request_for_Comments_on Retail Electricity Competition
 _     _  _     Plans
? __   Comments Due April_3,_2001
?     _Conference_Call_on Friday, March 16th at_11:00 a.m. EST

On February 28, 2001,_the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a request for_
information regarding the_outcome to date of the_different_regulatory_and 
legislative approaches states have taken to the introduction of_retail 
