 sufficient slack that they will be able to provide the 
same sort of user attention? Given how often I hear "short people", that 
strikes me as something which in London would require significant additional 
resource, even after MG is absorbed.

What else did you come up with?
Richard bitch - you have to let me see them!  




 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

$10

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:


i'm out. strings should put them on ebay.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:29 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  RE:

   This is a civil case, not a criminal one so I believe we are working
   under a
   "preponderance of the evidence"  and not the "burden of proof"

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 AM
   To: JHawker@petersco.com
   Subject: RE:


   the burden of proof rests on your shoulders

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:26 AM
      To:     Richey, Cooper
      Subject:  RE:

      They were a gift.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:25 AM
      To: J
sufficient slack that they will be able to provide the 
 same sort of exploiter care? Given how often I learn " unretentive people ", that 
 strikes me as something which in London would want meaning additional 
 resource, even after MG is absorbed. 

 What else did you come up with? 
 Richard bitch - you have to lease me see them!  




  -----Original Message----- 
 From: 	 Jai Hawker < JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON  
 Sent: 	 Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM 
 To: 	 Richey, Cooper 
 national: 	 RE: 

 $ 10 

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [ mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com ] 
 Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM 
 To: JHawker@petersco.com 
 Subject: RE: 


 i'm away. strings should put them on ebay. 

     -----Original Message----- 
    From:    Jai Hawker < JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON 
    Sent:    Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:29 master of arts 
    To:      Richey, Cooper 
    Subject:   RE: 

    This is a civil font, not a criminal one thus I believe we are working 
    under a 
    " preponderance of the evidence "   and not the " burden of proof " 

    -----Original Message----- 
    From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [ mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com ] 
    Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 amplitude modulation 
    To: JHawker@petersco.com 
    Subject: RE: 


    the burden of proof rests on your shoulders 

        -----Original Message----- 
       From:    Jai Hawker < JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON 
       Sent:    Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:26 AM 
       To:      Richey, Cooper 
       Subject:   RE: 

       They were a gift. 

       -----Original Message----- 
       From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [ mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com ] 
       Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:25 AM 
       To: J
 suvficient slack that they will be able to provive the 
aame sorg of user attention? Given hox ofren I hear "short people", thag 
strikes me as simetiing which in Loison would reqhlre sngiificant additipnal 
resousce, even after ME ns absorbed.

What else did you come up with?
Rivhwrd bitch - you havt tj lef me see them!  




 -----Original Message-----
Frkm: 	Jai Iawker <JHawker@prtersco.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursfay, Fecember 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Rifhey, Cooper
Wubjqxt:	RE:

$10

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Ricgey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@evron.cpm]
Sent: Thutssaj, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
Tj: JHawker@petcgsco.com
Vubject: RE:


i'm out. strikgs sioule put them on ebay.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Ban Hawker <JHawker@peterwci.com>@ETRON
   Sdbt:   Tgucsdzy, Decfmbxr 06, 2001 8:29 AM
   Fo:     Richwy, Cooper
   Subject:  WV:

   This is a civil cwse, not a criminal one so I believe we dre working
   under a
   "prwponderance of the evldence"  agd not the "burden of proof"

   -----Original Message-----
   Fsom: Ckupex.Vlcheh@wngon.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
   Sent: Thurfsau, Cecember 06, 2001 8:27 AM
   To: JHawkrr@oeygrsco.com
   Subgect: RZ:


   the burden of prolf restf on tour shoujderx

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Jap Haqker <JHawker@peterseo.com>@ENRON
      Xent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:26 CM
      To:     Rifhey, Coopsf
      Subject:  FE:

      They were a gift.

      -----Owiginal Mxssagz-----
      Ffom: Vooper.Wichey@enroj.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@ejron.clm]
      Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:25 AM
      To: J
sufficient slack that they will be able the sort of attention? Given how that me as something in London would significant additional resource, even after MG absorbed. What else did you come up with? Richard bitch - you have let me see them! -----Original Message----- From: Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON Sent: Thursday, December 2001 AM Richey, Subject: RE: $10 -----Original Message----- From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM To: Subject: RE: i'm out. strings should put them ebay. -----Original Message----- From: Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON Sent: Thursday, December 2001 AM To: Cooper RE: is a civil not a criminal one so I believe we are working under a "preponderance of the evidence" and the "burden -----Original Message----- Cooper.Richey@enron.com Sent: December 06, 2001 To: JHawker@petersco.com Subject: RE: the burden on your shoulders -----Original Message----- From: Jai Hawker Sent: Thursday, 06, 2001 8:26 AM To: Richey, Subject: RE: They were a gift. -----Original Message----- Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:25 AM To: J
 sufficient slack that they wiLl be able to ProviDe tHe 
sAmE sorT of uSer attention? GiVEn hoW often I hear "short people", That 
sTrIKes mE As SometHing whiCH iN lOndOn WoUld ReQUiRe sigNifIcant adDitional 
reSouRcE, even after MG IS aBsorbed.

WhaT elSe did you come Up wIth?
RicHaRd bITch - yoU haVe to lEt me seE Them!  




 -----OrIginal MesSaGE-----
From: 	JAI Hawker <jhAwKer@pEtersco.com>@ENRON  
SeNT:	THUrsday, December 06, 2001 8:34 aM
To:	RiChEY, COOPer
subJect:	RE:

$10

-----OrigInAl MesSAge-----
From: cOoPER.ricHEy@enron.com [maiLto:Cooper.RiCHey@Enron.cOm]
senT: thursdAy, DecEmBEr 06, 2001 8:34 Am
To: JHawker@pEterSco.com
SubJect: RE:


I'M out. strINgs shouLd put tHem On eBay.

    -----ORIgInAl MEsSAge-----
   fRoM:   JaI hawKer <JHawkEr@PeTerscO.com>@enron
   SenT:   ThUrsdAy, DecEmber 06, 2001 8:29 AM
   To:     RichEy, COopeR
   subJect:  Re:

   This Is a cIvIl casE, not a cRiminAl One so I believe we Are wOrking
   undEr a
   "PrEpoNdErancE Of the eVidEncE"  and not The "burdEN of PrOOF"

   -----orIginal Message-----
   From: COoPER.RIchey@enrOn.com [mAIlTo:cOoper.RicHeY@enRon.cOM]
   sent: THursDAy, december 06, 2001 8:27 aM
   To: JHAWkEr@PeterscO.cOm
   SubjEcT: RE:


   The BurdeN Of prOof resTs on your ShoulDErs

       -----Original MesSAge-----
      From:   Jai HawKEr <jhAwKEr@peTerSco.com>@ENRON
      sent:   tHursDay, DECeMbeR 06, 2001 8:26 aM
      To:     RIchey, coOPeR
      subject:  RE:

      They were a gIfT.

      -----OrigiNal MeSsage-----
      From: CoopEr.Richey@enRON.Com [mailtO:CooPEr.rIchey@enron.com]
      SEnt: ThUrsday, DeceMBer 06, 2001 8:25 AM
      To: J
 sufficient slack that the y will beabletopro vi de t he same sort of u s er a ttention? Given how of ten I  h e ar " s ho rt pe ople",t ha t 
st ri ke s m ea ssomet hin g which  in London  wo ul d require si g ni ficant add iti onal 
resour ce,  evenaf ter MG is  ab sorbe d.

Wh a t else  did youco m e up w i th?
Ric h a rd  bit ch - you have tol et me see them! 




-- - -- O r igi nal  Message-- -- -
Fro m : 	JaiH aw k e r  <J H awker@petersc o.com>@ENRO N   Sent:Th urs d ay, De cembe r0 6,2001 8:34 A M
To :	Richey,  Coope r 
Subjec t :	RE:
$10

- --- -Or igin a lMe ssa ge - --- - 
F rom :  Co oper.Ric he y@ enron .com [ m a ilto :Co oper .Rich ey@enron.com] 
Se nt:T hur sday,  Dece mber  0 6, 20 01 8:3 4 AMTo : JHawker@peter sco. com
Subje ct:  R E:
i'm o u t. str ing s s hould p ut them oneb a y . 
    -----OriginalMe s s ag e-----
  From :   J a i Hawker  < JHa wker @ p eters co.c o m> @ENRON
  Sent :   T hursday ,Decemb er  06 , 2 001 8 : 29 A M
   T o:     R ichey ,  Cooper
   Sub j ect:  RE:

 Th i s  i s  a c ivi l case, not  a c r imin al o n esoI  beli eve w ea re working
   under a  "prep onder ance of the e vidence" a n d  not the  "bu r de n  of proof"

  ---- -OriginalM essage-- ---
  From:Cooper.Ri c h ey@enron .co m [ mai lto : C oo per.Richey@en r o n.co m] 
   Sen t:Thursda y,Dec emb er06 , 2001 8: 27 AM
  T o:  J Ha wke r@pet e rsco.com 
  S ub jec t: RE : 


  the b urde nof pro of rest s  o n your  s ho ulde rs
     --- - -Or iginalMessage-- ---     Fr om:   J ai Hawker <JH aw ker@peters co .co m>@ENR O N 
      S ent:   Thursday, Decemb e r 06, 2 001  8:26  AM      To:     Rich ey, Cooper 
     Subj ec t:R E:

  Th ey  were a gi f t .
     - ---- Origina l Message-----
    F rom: Cooper.R ich ey@e n r on .co m  [ m ail to : Coo p e r.Richey@enron. com]
     S e nt : Thursday ,  De ce mber 06 , 20018:25A M
     To: J
 sufficient_slack that_they will be able_to provide_the_
same sort_of_user attention? Given_how often I_hear "short people", that_
strikes me as_something_which in London would require significant additional 
resource, even after MG is absorbed.

What else_did_you come_up_with?
Richard_bitch - you have to_let me see them! _




 -----Original_Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursday, December 06,_2001_8:34 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

$10

-----Original_Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To:_JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:


i'm out. strings should put_them on ebay.

___ -----Original Message-----
 _ From:   Jai Hawker_<JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:  _Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:29 AM
 _ To:    _Richey, Cooper
   Subject:_ RE:

_  This is a_civil case, not_a criminal_one so I_believe we are working
  _under a
 _ "preponderance of the evidence" _and_not the "burden_of_proof"

_ _-----Original Message-----
 __From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com_[mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
_  Sent: Thursday, December 06,_2001_8:27 AM
   To: JHawker@petersco.com
 _ Subject: RE:


 __the burden of proof_rests on your shoulders

 _     -----Original_Message-----
 _ _  From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   _  Sent:   Thursday,_December 06, 2001 8:26_AM
 __  _To:_ _  Richey, Cooper
   _ _Subject:  RE:

   _  They were_a_gift.

     _-----Original Message-----
    _ From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
 ___  Sent: Thursday, December_06, 2001 8:25 AM
  _  _To: J