Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April deal


	Got a call from El Paso asking to begin deal on 4/4???? let me know  what you want to do and

	El Paso's contract that will be picking up gas....

	Thanks Lynda I double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two trades as 
peak. The other two were in fact reported as off-peak - he just entered them 
incorrectly. But as far as this sleeve goes, there's no way one side is peak 
and the other isn't - Prebon has to make up their minds!

Again, let me know what you find out. Until then, we recognize the two trades 
as they are.

Thanks,
Kate




Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday  


That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal as peak and 
we show it as peak and I know it is the other side of a sleeve.  Can you 
double check with Bob for accuracy.

Evelyn




   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday  

Does this mean that 598738 should be off peak hours as well? Because 598739 
is only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both sides need 
to have the same hours......

Let me know, and I'll change them accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate



Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday  

sorry it is 598739




   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday  

598736 and 598737 have been changed to off-peak hours.
Cc: 	 Nacey, Sheila 
 Subject: 	 April deal 


	 Got a margin call from El Paso ask to begin deal on 4/4? ?? ? let me sleep together   what you want to do and 

	 El Paso's contract that will be nibble up natural gas.... 

	 Thanks Lynda I double - crack with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two deal as 
 peak. The other two were in fact report as off - point - he just enroll them 
 incorrectly. But as far as this sleeve go, there's no way one side is peak 
 and the early isn't - Prebon has to make up their mind! 

 Again, let me acknowledge what you find out. Until then, we recognize the two trades 
 as they are. 

 Thanks, 
 Kate 




 Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 
 05/02/2001 08:59 AM 
 To: Kate Symes / PDX / ECT@ECT 
 cc:  

 Subject: Re: Prebon softwood errors from yesterday  


 That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal as peak and 
 we show it as peak and I know it is the other side of a sleeve.   Can you 
 double check with Bob for accuracy. 

 Evelyn 




    Kate Symes @ ECT                 05/02/2001 10:43 AM 

 To: Evelyn Metoyer / Corp / Enron@ENRON 
 cc:  

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday  

 Does this entail that 598738 should be off peak hours equally well? Because 598739 
 is merely one english of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both side need 
 to have the same hours...... 

 lease me know, and I'll change them accordingly. 

 Thanks, 
 Kate 



 Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 
 05/02/2001 08:43 AM 
 To: Kate Symes / PDX / ECT@ECT 
 cc:  

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal error from yesterday  

 sorry it is 598739 




    Kate Symes @ ECT                 05/02/2001 10:25 AM 

 To: Evelyn Metoyer / Corp / Enron@ENRON 
 cc:  

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal error from yesterday  

 598736 and 598737 have been changed to off - vertex hours.
Cc:	Nwcey, Sheila
Subject:	April aeal


	Got a call yeom El Paso zsking tu begin deal on 4/4???? let me know  qhat tou want to do and

	El Pxso's contgact that wilo be pickinj up gas....

	Bkanks Pyndc M double-checked with Bob, dnd he said Prabun reported these two trades as 
peak. Ehe othrr two were in fwct ge[ortsd as off-peak - he just entered thej 
incorgectly. But as far as this sleeve goes, there'd no way one side is pfak 
and the othqe isn't - Prebun has to make up theit minds!

Again, let me know what yoj finb out. Until tyen, fe recognizx the nwo trades 
as they ara.

Thanks,
Late




Evelyn Metpyec@ENRIN
05/02/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDE/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Rg: Prebon daam errors from yesreeday  


Thad's wfqt K wzs cknfusef auout becauss Prebon shiws this deal as pesk qnd 
we show if as pqah and I know it is the other side of a vlesve.  Can you 
double chexk with Bob for accurwcy.

Evelyn




   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Matoyec/Curp/Tnvjv@WNGON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesesrcaj  

Does this mean that 598738 shoukd br off peak houts as wzml? Because 598739 
is only lne sidg of a sleeve dtal fpr EES. I would think that bith sides nevd 
ti have the same hobrs......

Let me knuw, amd I'lk change them accordinguy.

Thznks,
Kate



Evepyn Metoysf@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Katd Sjmes/[DX/ECT@ECU
zc:  

Subject: Re: Prqbon deal errprs froo yexterdar  

sorry ih is 598739




   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 WM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Te: [reton deal errovs from yesterdwy  

598736 and 598737 have been ckanged to off-peai hours.
Cc: Nacey, Sheila Subject: April deal Got from Paso asking begin deal on you to do and Paso's contract that be picking up gas.... Thanks Lynda double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two trades as peak. other two were in fact reported as off-peak - he just entered them But far this goes, there's no way one side is peak and the other isn't - Prebon has to up their minds! Again, let me know what find out. Until then, recognize the two trades as are. Kate Evelyn 05/02/2001 AM Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal peak and it as and know is the other a sleeve. Can you double check accuracy. Evelyn Kate Symes @ ECT 05/02/2001 10:43 To: Evelyn cc: Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors yesterday Does this mean that 598738 should be peak hours as well? Because 598739 is only one side of a sleeve deal for would think that both need to have same Let know, I'll change accordingly. Thanks, Kate Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 05/02/2001 08:43 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday sorry it is Symes ECT 05/02/2001 10:25 To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Re: deal errors from yesterday 598737 been hours.
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April Deal


	Got a caLl froM El pasO aSkinG to bEgin deal on 4/4???? let mE Know  What you want to do and

	El PaSo's coNtRAct tHAt Will bE pickinG Up GAS....

	ThAnKs lynDa i DoUble-cHecKed with bob, and he saId PReBon reported tHEsE two trades As 
pEak. The other tWo wEre in fAcT rePOrted As oFf-peaK - he jusT EntereD them 
incoRrECtly. BuT As far as THIs SleeVe goes, there's no way ONe SIde is peak 
and thE other IsN'T - PREBon Has To make up thEiR mindS!

again, leT Me KNOW whAT you find out. UnTil then, we reCOgnIze the TwO trADes 
as tHey arE.

THAnkS,
Kate




Evelyn metoYer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59 Am
To: KatE symes/PDx/eCT@ECT
cC:  

SubjeCt: RE: PrEbon DEaL eRroRs FRom YEsTerDAy  


THat's what i wAs ConfuSed aBOUT BecaUse prebOn shoWs this deal as pEak And 
wE ShoW it as Peak aNd I kNoW it is The othEr sidE oF a sleeve.  Can you 
dOublE check witH BoB fOr aCcUracy.

eVelyn




   KAte symEs @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

to: EvelyN metOyER/cOrP/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

SubjeCt: rE: prEbon deal Errors FRoM yESterday  

DOeS thIs meAN That 598738 sHoulD Be Off peak hOurs as WElL? BEcause 598739 
iS oNly one SiDe oF a sLeeve DEal fOr EES. I Would thiNk thaT Both sides need 
tO Have the same hoURs......

lET mE Know, And i'll change thEm acCOrdiNgly.

tHaNks,
kAte



EvElyn MEtOYeR@eNRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PdX/eCT@ECT
Cc:  

SubJect: Re: Prebon dEal errors fROM YesterdaY  

sorRY iT Is 598739




   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 aM

To: EVelyn MetoyER/Corp/EnrOn@ENRoN
cc:  

SubjEct: Re: PrebON Deal erroRs fRom YesTerDAY  

598736 aNd 598737 have been chaNGEd to OfF-peak hoUrs.
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject: 	April dea l


Got  aca ll f romEl Paso asking to b egin deal on 4/4???? l et me  k n ow w ha t you  want t o  d o and 
	E l P as o 's  cont rac t thatwill be pi cki ng  up gas....	T hanks Lynd a I  double-chec ked  withBo b,a nd he  sa id Pr ebon r e ported  these tw ot radesa s 
peak . Th e ot her two were in f a ct reported as of f-peak  - he j ust  en tered them  incor r ectly.B ut a s  fa r  as this slee ve goes, th e re' s no w ay  on e  sideis pe ak 
an d the other  isn 't - Preb on has to make up thei r mind s!
Ag ain, le tmekn o w w h at  yo u  fi nd out.Un ti l the n, w e r e cogn ize  the  twotrades 
as th eyare. 
Th anks, 
Kate 



E velyn  Metoy er@EN RO N
05/02/2001 08 :59AM
To: Ka teSy mes /P DX/EC T @ECT
c c: 
Subject : Re: P r ebo nd e a lerrors from yester da y  

That's  whatI  w as confused  a bou t be c a use P rebo n  s hows thi s deal as  p eak and  we sho witaspeaka nd I  knowit is th e oth e r side of a sl e eve.  Can you 
d o u bl e  che ckwith Bob fo r ac c urac y.
E ve lyn 



  Kat eS ym e s @ ECT              05/0 2/200 1 10:43 AM

T o: EvelynM e t oyer/Cor p/En r on @ ENRON
cc:  

S ubjec t: Re: Pre b on dealerror s from y esterday
Does th ismea n t hat 5 98 738 should be o ff p ea k hours  as  well?Bec aus e 5 987 39  
is only  one sid eof  a  s lee ve de a l for EE S.  Iwo uld  thin k  thatbothside sne e d to have th e same  h ou rs.. ... .
Letme k n ow,  and I' ll change  th e m ac co rd ingly.
Thanks,
Kate 


Evelyn M et oye r@ENRO N 05/02/20 01 08:43 AM
To: Kate Sy m es/PDX/ ECT @ECTcc: 

Subjec t:Re: Pr ebo n  dealerrors  from  y est e r day so rry  i t is 59873 9 


   K at e Sy mes @ E CT               0 5/0 2/2001 10:25AM
To: E ve lyn Me t oye r/ C orp / E nron@ENRON
cc: 

Subject :R e:  Prebon de a l e rr ors fro m yeste rday

59873 6 and 598 737 havebe en c h a nge d to off-p eak hour s.
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April_deal


	Got a_call from El Paso_asking to_begin_deal on_4/4????_let me know_ what you_want to do and

	El_Paso's contract that_will_be picking up gas....

	Thanks Lynda I double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported_these_two trades_as_
peak._The other two were in_fact reported as off-peak -_he just_entered them 
incorrectly. But as far as this_sleeve_goes, there's no_way one side is peak 
and the other isn't_- Prebon has to make up_their minds!

Again, let_me_know_what you find out._Until then, we recognize the two_trades 
as they are.

Thanks,
Kate




Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59_AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal errors from yesterday  


That's_what I was confused about_because Prebon_shows this deal as peak_and 
we show_it as_peak and I_know it is the other side_of a sleeve._ Can you 
double check with_Bob_for accuracy.

Evelyn




 __Kate_Symes @_ECT  __ __     __  05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:_ 

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal_errors from yesterday _

Does this mean that 598738_should be off peak hours as_well? Because_598739 
is_only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would_think that both sides need 
to_have the same hours......

Let_me know,_and_I'll change them_accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate



Evelyn_Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43_AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal errors_from yesterday  

sorry it is_598739




   Kate_Symes_@ ECT    _     _    _05/02/2001_10:25_AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject:_Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday_ 

598736 and_598737 have been changed to off-peak hours.