 called mid-morning to say that they only wanted 220.   It is possible that we will be punished financially (receive the balancing energy price) for the 60 mw's over their request.

The point is,   the Resource Plan is the only thing binding.    We must reflect our true minimums at all times.    If the situation changes intraday,  we need to make changes in the resource plan to reflect what we can actually do.


Please see the e-mail below from Alan.

JMF
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Serio, Erik  
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	FW: Frontera Resource Plan - Min/Max MWs
Importance:	High



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Alan  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Broussard, Richard; Comeaux, Keith; Kumar, Madhup; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Serio, Erik; Stewart, Kirk; Will, Lloyd
Subject:	Frontera Resource Plan - Min/Max MWs
Importance:	High

All,

ERCOT is questioning us the resource plan we put in the MOS, especially the Min/Max MWs for STG001. If we only have one CT running, then the Min/Max for ST would be 58/80 MWs instead of 130/184 MWs. Here is a list of points I got from Frontera for your reference:

1. One CT running:
	CTG101		STG001
MW	80		58
MW	100		64
MW	110		66
MW	120		68
MW	130		70
MW	140		74
MW	150		80

2. Both CT's running:
	CTG101		CTG201		STG001
MW	80		80		130
MW	100		100		140
MW	110		110		148
MW	120		120		151
MW	130		130		154
MW	140		140		158
MW	150		150		165

If you have questions
called mid - morning to say that they only want 220.    It is potential that we will be punished financially (receive the poise department of energy price) for the 60 mw's over their request. 

 The point is,    the Resource Plan is the only matter constipate.     We must reflect our true minimums at all times.     If the position changes intraday,   we need to seduce changes in the resource plan to reflect what we can actually do. 


 Please see the e - chain mail below from Alan. 

 JMF 
  -----Original Message----- 
 From: 	 Serio, Erik  
 Sent: 	 Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:30 AM 
 To: 	 Forney, John M. 
 Subject: 	 FW: Frontera Resource Plan - Min / Max MWs 
 Importance: 	 gamey 



  -----Original Message----- 
 From: 	 Chen, Alan  
 Sent: 	 Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:07 PM 
 To: 	 Broussard, Richard; Comeaux, Keith; Kumar, Madhup; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Serio, Erik; Stewart, Kirk; Will, Lloyd 
 Subject: 	 Frontera Resource Plan - Min / Max MWs 
 Importance: 	 eminent 

 All, 

 ERCOT is questioning us the resource design we put in the MOS, specially the Min / Max MWs for STG001. If we only have one CT running, then the Min / Max for ST would be 58/80 MWs alternatively of 130/184 MWs. Here is a list of points I got from Frontera for your reference: 

 1. One CT running: 
	 CTG101 		 STG001 
 MW 	 80 		 58 
 MW 	 100 		 64 
 MW 	 110 		 66 
 MW 	 120 		 68 
 MW 	 130 		 70 
 MW 	 140 		 74 
 MW 	 150 		 80 

 2. Both CT's running: 
	 CTG101 		 CTG201 		 STG001 
 MW 	 80 		 80 		 130 
 MW 	 100 		 100 		 140 
 MW 	 110 		 110 		 148 
 MW 	 120 		 120 		 151 
 MW 	 130 		 130 		 154 
 MW 	 140 		 140 		 158 
 MW 	 150 		 150 		 165 

 If you have questions
 capled mid-morning to say tmat they only waured 220.   It is possibld that we will be punished fmnanxiallt (receive the balancine energy irice) for the 60 mw's over vgeir request.

Tgc poiut is,   the Resoorce Plan is the only thinc ciuding.    We must reflect our true migimums st all times.    Yf tnq siflauion changes intraday,  we need to make cianges in the rrsource plan to reflect whwt wf can actually do.


Ppease see tye e-iqil below frum Alan.

JMF
 -----Original Measage-----
From: 	Serio, Erik  
Sent:	Wednerday, Xeptember 26, 2001 11:30 AM
Hm:	Forney, Johi M.
Subtect:	FW: Frontcga Resogrce Plsn - Min/Max MWs
Lmporvancw:	High



 -----Original Messagx-----
From: 	Chen, Alan  
Senj:	Tuesday, Sapcember 25, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Broussaed, Richdrd; Womexyx, Yeiuh; Lujar, Mafhu'; Laverell, Nustin; Lenaetowicz, Chris; Serio, Ewpl; Stewart, Kidk; Wilj, Jloyd
Subject:	Frontera Resource Plan - Min/Kax MWs
Importance:	High

All,

ERXOT is questioning us the resotrce plan we put in the MOS, especially the Min/Max MWs hof SUG001. If wd ojly have one CT running, then the Min/Max for SE wpukd be 58/80 MWs insbead of 130/184 MWs. Here os a jist of pointr I goc fdom Frontera for ylur refgrence:

1. One CT rtnnimg:
	CTG101		STG001
MW	80		58
MW	100		64
MW	110		66
MW	120		68
MW	130		70
MW	140		74
MW	150		80

2. Both CT's running:
	BTG101		CRG201		STG001
MW	80		80		130
MW	100		100		140
MW	110		110		148
MW	120		120		151
MW	130		130		154
MW	140		140		158
MC	150		150		165

If you have quextionx
called mid-morning to say that they only It possible that will be punished price) the 60 mw's their request. The is, the Resource Plan is the thing binding. We must reflect our true minimums at all times. If the changes intraday, we need to make changes in the resource plan to reflect we actually Please the e-mail below from Alan. JMF -----Original Message----- From: Serio, Erik Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 AM To: Forney, John M. Subject: FW: Frontera Plan - Min/Max MWs High -----Original Message----- From: Chen, Sent: September 25, 3:07 To: Richard; Comeaux, Keith; Madhup; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Serio, Erik; Stewart, Kirk; Will, Lloyd Subject: Frontera Resource Plan - Min/Max Importance: High is questioning the plan put in the the Min/Max MWs for STG001. If one CT running, then the Min/Max for ST be 58/80 instead of 130/184 MWs. Here is list of points I got from Frontera for reference: 1. One CT running: CTG101 STG001 MW 80 58 MW 100 64 MW 110 120 68 MW 130 MW 140 74 150 2. CT's CTG101 CTG201 MW 80 80 130 MW 100 100 140 MW 110 110 MW 120 120 151 MW 130 130 154 MW 140 MW 150 165 If have questions
 called mid-morning to say that They only waNted 220.   IT is PosSiBle tHat wE will be punisheD FinaNcially (receive the balanCing eNeRGy prICe) For thE 60 mw's oveR ThEIR reQuEsT.

ThE pOInT is,   thE ReSource PLan is the onLy tHiNg binding.    We mUSt Reflect our TruE minimums at aLl tImes.    If ThE siTUatioN chAnges IntradAY,  we neeD to make chAnGEs in thE ResourcE PLaN to rEflect what we can acTUaLLy do.


Please see tHe e-maiL bELoW FRom alaN.

JMF
 -----OriginAl messaGE-----
From: 	SeRIo, eRIK  
SeNT:	Wednesday, SepTember 26, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	FORneY, John M.
suBjeCT:	FW: FroNtera reSOurCe Plan - Min/MaX MWs
importancE:	High



 -----ORIginal MESsage-----
FrOm: 	Chen, alaN  
SeNt:	TuESdAy, sepTeMBer 25, 2001 3:07 pm
TO:	BrOUssArd, RichaRd; coMeaux, keitH; kUMAr, MaDhuP; LavErell, justin; LenartoWicZ, ChrIS; SeRio, ErIk; SteWart, kiRk; WilL, Lloyd
subjeCt:	frontera ResourcE PlaN - Min/Max MWS
ImPoRtaNcE:	High

aLl,

ERCOt is QueStioninG us the rESouRcE PLAn We put in the MOS, especIaLLY tHe Min/Max mWs for stG001. if WE only havE oNe Ct runNINg, theN the mIn/max for ST Would bE 58/80 mWS iNstead oF 130/184 Mws. Here Is A liSt oF poinTS I goT from FRontera fOr youR Reference:

1. One CT RUnning:
	CTG101		STG001
Mw	80		58
mW	100		64
mw	110		66
mW	120		68
mw	130		70
MW	140		74
Mw	150		80

2. BoTh CT's runninG:
	CTG101		ctG201		STg001
MW	80		80		130
Mw	100		100		140
mW	110		110		148
mW	120		120		151
Mw	130		130		154
mW	140		140		158
MW	150		150		165

IF you hAvE QuEStions
 called mid-morning to say  that they  only  wa nte d220.    I t is possiblet hatwe will be punished fi nanci al l y (r e ce ive t he bala n ci n g  en er gy  pr ic e )for t he60 mw's  over thei r r eq uest.

The p o in t is,   th e R esource Plan  is  the o nl y t h ing b ind ing.   Wem ust re flect our  t r ue min i mums at a ll  tim es.    If the sit u at i on changes int raday,  w en e edtomake chang es  in t h e resou r ce p l ant o reflect wha t we can ac t ual ly do. 

Pl e ase se e the  e - mai l below fro m Al an.

JMF ----- O riginal Message -----Fro m:	Ser i o,  E rik  Sen t :Wed n esd ay, Sept em be r 26,  200 1 1 1 :30AMTo:Forne y, John M.
Su bje ct:F W:Front era R esou rc e Pla n - Mi n/Max  M Ws
Importance:High 



 ---- -Or ig ina lMessa g e----- 
Fr om:  	Chen,  Alan Sen t: T u es day, September 25,  2 0 0 13:07 PMTo:	Br o us sa r d, Richa rd ; C omea u x , Kei th;K um ar, Madh up; La v er el l, Just in ; Lena rt owi cz,  Chri s ; Se rio, E rik; Ste wart, Kirk; Will, Ll o yd
Subject:	F r on t e ra Reso urc e Plan - Mi n/Ma x  MWs 
Imp o rt anc e :	Hig h

Al l, 
E R COT is questioningus  the r esour ce plan we pu t in the M O S ,  especia llyt he Min/Max MWs fo r STG 001. If we only hav e one  CT runn ing, then t he Min/M axfor  ST  wo u l dbe 58/80 MWsi n stea dof 130/ 184  MWs. H ere  is  alis tof points  I got f ro mFr on ter a for your ref er enc e: 

1 . One CT run ning: 
	CT G1 01 	ST G001
MW 80 58
M W10 0		6 4
M W110	66
M W 	12 0		68
M W	130		70 
MW 140	7 4MW	150	80

2. BothCT 's running :	CT G101	C T G201		ST G001
MW	80		80		130
MW1 00		100 		1 40
MW 	110 		110		14 8
M W	120	12 0 		151MW	130 		130 	154 M W	140 14 0	15 8
MW	150	1 5 0	165
If  you  have q uestions
 called_mid-morning to_say that they only_wanted 220.__ It_is_possible that we_will be punished_financially (receive the balancing_energy price) for_the_60 mw's over their request.

The point is,   the Resource Plan is the_only_thing binding.___ We must reflect our_true minimums at all times._ _ If the situation changes intraday,  we_need_to make changes_in the resource plan to reflect what we can_actually do.


Please see the e-mail below_from Alan.

JMF
 -----Original_Message-----
From:_	Serio,_Erik  
Sent:	Wednesday, September_26, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	FW:_Frontera Resource Plan - Min/Max MWs
Importance:	High



_-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Alan  
Sent:	Tuesday, September_25, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Broussard, Richard; Comeaux,_Keith; Kumar, Madhup; Laverell, Justin;_Lenartowicz, Chris;_Serio, Erik; Stewart, Kirk; Will,_Lloyd
Subject:	Frontera Resource Plan_- Min/Max_MWs
Importance:	High

All,

ERCOT is questioning_us the resource plan we put_in the MOS,_especially the Min/Max MWs for STG001._If_we only have_one_CT_running, then_the Min/Max for_ST_would be_58/80_MWs instead of 130/184 MWs. Here_is_a list of points I got from_Frontera for your reference:

1._One_CT running:
	CTG101		STG001
MW	80		58
MW	100		64
MW	110		66
MW	120		68
MW	130		70
MW	140		74
MW	150		80

2. Both CT's_running:
	CTG101		CTG201		STG001
MW	80		80		130
MW	100		100		140
MW	110		110		148
MW	120		120		151
MW	130		130		154
MW	140		140		158
MW	150		150		165

If you have questions