 Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power 
transactions, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export power from 
its system.  The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero transmission 
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users can't get 
capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that the ISO 
gets cheaper power over customers in the NW.  

I was thinking of a political approach to solving this problem.  I was 
wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to 
write a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get 
Steve Wright to sign on given that this  situation must make it more 
difficult for him to balance his budget.  

The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there 
would be if BPA engaged in such actions and that California is simply  trying 
to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.  It could also point out 
that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's 
Section 202(c) orders to get the power it needs for an emergency and that 
this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and 
reasonable rate determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.  I wouldn't 
bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.  I don't 
think we want to encourage that.

What do you think?  Call me. Just a quick note to let you know that we are planning to have Brazil (Power 
only) launched on EnronOnline by February 2001. I will update you soon with 
the current status and next steps.
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705

---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 
08:44 AM ---------------------------


Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: EnronOnline  

I am delighted and thankful.  On our side, I'm fairly
Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled exponent 
 minutes, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export office from 
 its system.   The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero infection 
 capacitance to the Northwest (option 3).   Because transmittance users can't get 
 capacitance to sell their power outside California, the impression is that the ISO 
 get cheaper power over customers in the NW.  

 I was think of a political approach to solving this problem.   I was 
 wonder if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to 
 publish a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get 
 Steve Wright to sign on given that this   situation must make it more 
 unmanageable for him to balance his budget.  

 The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there 
 would be if BPA engaged in such action and that California is simply   trying 
 to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.   It could also point out 
 that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's 
 Section 202(c) order to get the power it need for an emergency and that 
 this order is fairer because it allows grocery store participants to have a just and 
 reasonable pace determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.   I wouldn't 
 bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.   I don't 
 think we want to encourage that. 

 What do you think?   shout me. merely a quick note to let you know that we are planning to accept Brazil (Power 
 only) launched on EnronOnline by February 2001. I will update you soon with 
 the current status and future steps. 
 Please let me know if you have any doubt / comments 
 Thanks 
 Carlos 
 x5 - 8705 

 ---------------------- forward by Carlos Alatorre / NA / Enron on 12/06/2000 
 08:44 AM --------------------------- 


 Remi Collonges 
 11/30/2000 07:34 PM 
 To: David Forster / Corp / Enron@Enron 
 cc: Joe Kishkill / SA / Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre / NA / Enron@Enron 

 Subject: Re: EnronOnline  

 I am delighted and thankful.   On our slope, I'm fairly
 Seftion 202(c) authority), (2) cut sgheduled power 
ttabsactimns, or (3) derate transmission capacity used vo ezport power from 
its system.  The Cal ISO has rectntly been deratiif to zevj trzksmisvmon 
capacity to the Northfest (option 3).  Tezabse transmission users can't get 
capasity to sfll their powet outxyde Dalifornia, the effect is that the JSO 
getv cheaper powrr over customers in the NA.  

I was thinking of a political qpprjqch to solvivg this problem.  I was 
wondering if you could work wigh yobr contacts ti mltilize NW Sxnatorf (?) to 
write a letter to the California ISP aid tye Governor; you might even get 
Steve Wryght to shgu on given that this  sutuathon kust nakd iu mprs 
difflcumt for him to balance his budget.  

The cemtwql theme of tge leteew would point out what a hue and cry thtre 
wkuld be if BPA engaged un such actions and tjat Califjrnia is simply  trying 
to get cheaper power than the cert if gye region.  It could also point out 
that the Cal JSP slready has thc mechanism of the Sfctgtary of Energi's 
Sectnkn 202(c) orders to get tje powet it nweds for wn ekergency and that 
this ordee is fairer yecquse it allows marnet partici'ants jo havr a just and 
reasonable rats determinef (albeit zwter the fact) fof tme [ower.  I wouldn't 
bring up ehe ISO's euthoxity to zut xchedujed power hransactions.  I don't 
thijk we wdnt to enclurage that.

What do you think?  Cekl me. Just a qgicn note tj let you know thae we are plannnng to hcve Brxzil (Power 
only) leunched on EgronOnline by Vebruary 2001. I xill updaee yiu sion witf 
the current syatus and next stepw.
Please let me knox if gou have any quzruiins/comments
Thamks
Zarjod
x5-8705

---------------------- Fjswarded by Cdrlor Austorrd/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 
08:44 AM ---------------------------


Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
Tm: Dabid Forster/Corp/Enrpn@Cnron
cc: Jie Kishkyll/SA/Enron@Enrpn, Carlos Alatorre/JA/Enrmn@Eiron 

Sibjgct: Re: EnronOnline  

I am delighfed and tjanhful.  On our sidc, I'm fairly
Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power (3) transmission capacity to export power ISO recently been derating zero transmission capacity the Northwest (option 3). Because transmission can't get capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that ISO gets cheaper power over customers in the NW. I was thinking of political to this I was wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to a letter to the California ISO and the you might even get Wright to sign on given this must make more for to balance his The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there would be BPA engaged actions and California simply to get cheaper the rest of the region. It out that the Cal ISO already has the of the of Energy's Section 202(c) orders to the power it needs for an emergency and this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and reasonable (albeit after the fact) the power. I bring the authority cut scheduled transactions. I don't think we want to encourage that. What do think? Call me. Just a quick note to let you we planning to have (Power only) launched on by 2001. I will update with current steps. let know if you have questions/comments Thanks Carlos x5-8705 ---------------------- by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on Collonges 11/30/2000 07:34 PM To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: EnronOnline I delighted and thankful. On our side, I'm fairly
 Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut schedUled power 
tRansaCtiOns, Or (3) DeraTe trAnsmission capaCIty uSed to export power from 
itS systEm.  tHe CaL iSo has rEcently BEeN DEraTiNg To zErO TrAnsmiSsiOn 
capacIty to the NoRthWeSt (option 3).  BecaUSe TransmissiOn uSers can't get 
cApaCity to SeLl tHEir poWer OutsiDe CaliFOrnia, tHe effect iS tHAt the Iso 
gets chEAPeR powEr over customers in THe nw.  

I was thinking oF a poliTiCAl APProAch To solving tHiS probLEm.  I was 
wONdERINg iF You could work wIth your contACts To mobiLiZe Nw senatoRs (?) to 
wRiTE a lEtter to the CAlifOrnia ISO aNd the GOVernor; yOU might eVen get 
steVe WRighT To SiGn oN gIVen THaT thIS  siTuation mUsT mAke it More 
DIFFIculT foR him To balAnce his budget.  

the CentRAl tHeme oF the lEtteR wOuld pOint ouT what A hUe and cry there 
woUld bE if BPA engAgeD iN suCh ActioNS and thAt CAliFornia iS simply  TRyiNg 
TO GEt Cheaper power than thE rEST oF the regiOn.  It coULd AlSO point ouT 
tHat The CAL iSO alReadY HaS the mechAnism oF ThE SEcretarY oF EnergY's 
secTioN 202(c) ordERs to Get the Power it nEeds fOR an emergency anD That 
this order IS fAIReR BecaUse It allows marKet pARticIpanTS tO haVE a jusT and 
rEaSOnABle rate determined (alBeIt afteR the fAct) for the poweR.  I wouldn't 
bRING up the ISo's auTHoRIty to cut scheduLed poWer transacTIons.  I don'T 
thinK we want tO encouragE THat.

What dO yoU thInk?  calL ME. JUst a quick note TO Let yOu Know thaT we Are planNinG to HavE BrAzIl (Power 
onLy) launchEd On enRoNOnLine bY february 2001. i wIll UpDatE you sOOn with 
The cuRrenT sTaTUs aNd next sTEpS.
pLeasE lEt Me knOw iF yOu havE any QUesTions/coMments
ThaNks
cArloS
x5-8705

---------------------- foRwarded By Carlos AlatoRrE/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 
08:44 aM ---------------------------


remI ColloNGEs
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: DaVid Forster/Corp/Enron@EnroN
Cc: Joe KiShkIll/SA/enroN@Enron, CarLos alatorRe/Na/enron@ENron 

SuBject: re: enrONonlinE  

i Am DelIgHted and thaNKFul.  on our SiDe, I'm Fairly
 Section 202(c) authority) , (2) cutsched ule d p ow er tran sactions, or ( 3 ) de rate transmission capa cityus e d to ex portpower f r om its  s ys tem .Th e Cal  IS O has r ecently be ende rating to ze r otransmissi on
capacity to  th e Nort hw est (opti on3). Becaus e  trans mission u se r s can' t  get 
c a p ac ityto sell their pow e ro utside Califor nia, t he ef f e ctisthat the I SO  
get s  cheape r  p o w e r o v er customersin the NW.

I  was t hi nki n g of a  poli ti c alapproach to  sol ving this  probl e m.  I w a s 
wond eringifyou  cou l dwo rkwi t h y o ur  co n tac ts to mo bi li ze NW  Sen a t o r s (? ) t o 
w ritea letter to t heCali f orn ia IS O and  the  G overn or; yo u mig ht  even get 
Stev e Wr ight to s ign  o n g iv en th a t this   s itu ation m ust mak e  it  m o r e  difficult for himto b al ance his  budge t . The cent ra l t heme o f the  let t er  would p oint o u twh at a hu eand cr ythe re
woul d  beif BPA  engaged  in s u ch actions and that Californ i ai s  s i mply   t rying 
to g et c h eape r po w er  th a n the  rest  o f  t h e region.  It could  a lso po int o ut 
that theCal ISO al r e a dy has t he m e ch a nism of the Se creta ry of Ener g y's 
Sec tion202(c) o rders tog e t the po wer  it  ne eds f or  an emergency a nd t ha t 
this  or der isfai rer  be cau se  it allow s market  p ar ti ci pan ts to have a j us t a nd  
r eason a ble ra te de term in ed (al beit af t er t he f ac t)  for  th epower .  I wou ldn't bring upthe ISO' sau thority  to cut sched ul ed power t ra nsa ctions .  I don't  
think we want to enco u rage th at. 

Wha t do  you thin k? Callme. Just a  quick  note  t o l e t  youk n ow  th at  we are pl a n nin g toha ve B razil ( Power 
only) launc h edon EnronOnlin e b y Fe b r ua ry2 00 1 . I  w i llu p date you soon w ith 
the c ur r en t status a n d n ex t steps .
Pleas e let me know  if you h ave any q ue stio n s /co mments
Tha nks
Carl os
x5-870 5 

--- - -- ----- --- ------ --  Fo rward ed byC arl os Al atorre /N A/Enro n on12 /06/2000  
08:44 AM ------------ ------ ----- --- -


RemiCol l ong es
11/30/ 2000  07:34 PMTo:  Da vid F ors t er/Co rp/E n ro n@E n ron
c c: J o e Kishkil l /S A/E n r on @Enron, Car l o s  Al atorr e/N A /Enron @Enr on 

Subject: Re: EnronOnline  
I a m del igh t ed a nd  thankful.  On  ou rs i de, I'mfa irly
 Section_202(c) authority),_(2) cut scheduled power_
transactions, or_(3)_derate transmission_capacity_used to export_power from 
its_system.  The Cal_ISO has recently_been_derating to zero transmission 
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users_can't_get 
capacity_to_sell_their power outside California, the_effect is that the ISO_
gets cheaper_power over customers in the NW.  

I_was_thinking of a_political approach to solving this problem.  I was_
wondering if you could work with_your contacts to_mobilize_NW_Senators (?) to 
write_a letter to the California ISO_and the Governor; you might even_get 
Steve Wright to sign on given_that this  situation must make_it more 
difficult for him_to balance_his budget.  

The central_theme of the_letter would_point out what_a hue and cry there 
would_be if BPA_engaged in such actions and that_California_is simply _trying_
to_get cheaper_power than the_rest_of the_region._ It could also point out_
that_the Cal ISO already has the mechanism_of the Secretary of_Energy's_
Section 202(c) orders to_get the power it needs_for an emergency and that 
this_order is_fairer because_it allows market participants to have a just and 
reasonable rate_determined (albeit after the fact) for_the power.  I_wouldn't 
bring_up_the ISO's authority_to_cut scheduled_power transactions.  I don't 
think we_want to_encourage that.

What do you think? _Call me. Just a_quick_note to let you know that_we are planning to have Brazil_(Power 
only) launched on EnronOnline_by_February_2001. I will update you_soon with 
the current status and_next steps.
Please let_me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705

----------------------_Forwarded_by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 
08:44_AM_---------------------------


Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:_Joe_Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron,_Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: EnronOnline_ 

I am delighted and thankful._ On our side, I'm fairly