  under assumptions requested
by the ALJ.    

Thanks especially to Ed Fong, Mohamed Derbas, Bill Saxe, Mike Strong, Keith
Melville, and Jeff Parrot for key assistance in getting this filing out in
one-day. 

Based on this filing,  the Commission may (we have no Proposed Decision yet)
rule as soon as August 23 on an increase to SDG&E rates of approximately
3-cents to recover the updated DWR revenue requirements.  

If you have questions, please contact me, Lynn Van Wagenen, or Keith
Melville. 

Excerpt of SDG&E pleading: 

	On August 15, 2001, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Wetzell issued an
"ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ON THE AUGUST 7, 2001 REVENUE REQUIREMENT
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES" directing San Diego Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E) to produce updated estimates, including supporting analyses,
of the system average electric rate increases required based on the revised
revenue requirements determined by the Department of Water Resources' (DWR),
as set forth in the August 7, 2001 DWR communication to the California
Public Utilities Commission.   

 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Hay, James E.  
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:00 AM 
To:     Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Schavrien, Lee; Melville, Keith W. 
Subject:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 

This email contains the pleading, assumptions, and a summary.  The summary
is the accurate updated version.  

 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Ruiz, Annie  
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 8:31 AM 
To:     ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill,
Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com;
cjw5@pge.com; cw
under assumptions requested 
 by the ALJ.    

 Thanks especially to Ed Fong, Mohamed Derbas, Bill Saxe, Mike Strong, Keith 
 Melville, and Jeff Parrot for key aid in get this filing out in 
 one - day. 

 Based on this filing,   the Commission may (we have no Proposed decisiveness yet) 
 rule as soon as August 23 on an addition to SDG&E rate of approximately 
 3 - cents to recuperate the updated DWR revenue prerequisite.  

 If you have questions, please reach me, Lynn Van Wagenen, or Keith 
 Melville. 

 Excerpt of SDG&E pleading: 

	 On August 15, 2001, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Wetzell issued an 
 " ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ON THE AUGUST 7, 2001 REVENUE REQUIREMENT 
 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES " direct San Diego Gas & Electric 
 Company (SDG&E) to produce updated estimates, admit supporting analyses, 
 of the system average electric pace increases want based on the revised 
 revenue prerequisite determined by the Department of Water Resources' (DWR), 
 as set forth in the August 7, 2001 DWR communication to the California 
 Public Utilities Commission.   

  -----Original Message----- 
 From:    Hay, James E.  
 Sent:    Friday, August 17, 2001 9:00 AM 
 To:      Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Schavrien, Lee; Melville, Keith W. 
 Subject:         FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 
 2001 in A.00 - 10 - 045 / A.01 - 01 - 044 

 This email contains the pleading, assumptions, and a summary.   The summary 
 is the accurate updated version.  

  -----Original Message----- 
 From:    Ruiz, Annie  
 Sent:    Friday, August 17, 2001 8:31 AM 
 To:      ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill, 
 Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com; 
 cjw5@pge.com; cw
  ujder assumptions requesttd
by the ALJ.    

Tkqnks evpeciamly to Ea Fong, Mohamed Derbas, Bill Sexe, Nike Wtrong, Keith
Melville, avd Jeff Pwrrot foe keb assistance in jstting bkis fjping iut in
one-day. 

Bssed on thhs filing,  the Cumlission may (we have no Proposed Decysion yrt)
gule as soon af Aubtst 23 on an increase to SDG&E rates of alproximetely
3-cents to rrcover the updated DWR revfnue requirements.  

If jou have qugatijbs, please covtact me, Ljun Van Wagehen, or Keith
Melville. 

Excerpt of SDG&E pleading: 

	In Auhost 15, 2001, Adminiwtratpve Law Judge (ALJ) Wetsell isxued an
"ADMINISBRATITE LQW JUDGE'S RULING ON TIE AUGUST 7, 2001 REVENUE TEQUIREMEND
OY THE DEPARTMENT OF WQTWR REVOURWES" aureztihg Szn Dieho Jas & Electrjc
Company (SEG&E) to produce updaued vxtimates, incmuding stpporting analyses,
of the system average elsctric rate increases rwquired based on the tevised
revqnue requirements determined by the Department of Watec Fesiuvces' (EWG),
as set forth in the August 7, 2001 DWR communicatijh uo nhe California
Pubjic Utilitirs Cpimission.   

 -----Otiginal Measage----- 
From:   Hay, Jwmes E.  
Sent:   Friday, Augist 17, 2001 9:00 AM 
To:     Mueller, Mixhelle; Fong, Vd; Sxhavrien, Lee; Melviple, Keith W. 
Subkect:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ZLJ Wetzell'd Ruling kw August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 

Ghix amail contains the pleadind, assumptmons, cnd a suomari.  The fummary
is hhe agwurate updated verdion.  

 -----Mriginal Mfssage----- 
From:   Ruiz, Annie  
Sent:   Friday, Augusj 17, 2001 8:31 AK 
To:     ayk@ciuc.ca.gov; bfinkejstein@turn.org; yishop@jrcood.coo; Brill,
Thojas; bsl@rpuc.ca.gov; chyefskip@aol.com; fhristine.cosva@sce.com;
ctw5@pgw.com; cw
under assumptions requested by the ALJ. Thanks Ed Mohamed Derbas, Saxe, Mike Strong, for assistance in getting filing out in Based on this filing, the Commission (we have no Proposed Decision yet) rule as soon as August 23 on increase to SDG&E rates of approximately 3-cents to recover the updated DWR revenue If have please me, Lynn Van Wagenen, or Keith Melville. Excerpt of SDG&E pleading: On August 15, 2001, Administrative Judge (ALJ) Wetzell issued an "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ON THE AUGUST 7, REVENUE REQUIREMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT WATER directing San Gas Electric (SDG&E) to produce estimates, including supporting analyses, of the system average electric rate increases required based on the revised revenue determined by of Water (DWR), set in the August DWR communication to the California Public Message----- From: Hay, James E. Sent: Friday, August 2001 9:00 To: Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Schavrien, Melville, Keith W. Subject: FW: Reply of SDG&E ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 This email contains the pleading, assumptions, summary. The summary is accurate updated version. Message----- Ruiz, Sent: August 17, 8:31 AM To: ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill, Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com; cw
  under assumptions requested
By the ALJ.    

ThAnks eSpeCiaLlY to ED FonG, Mohamed Derbas, bIll SAxe, Mike Strong, Keith
MelvIlle, aNd jEff PARrOt for Key assiSTaNCE in GeTtIng ThIS fIling Out In
one-daY. 

Based on thIs fIlIng,  the CommisSIoN may (we have No PRoposed DecisIon Yet)
rulE aS soON as AuGusT 23 on an IncreaSE to SDG&e rates of aPpROximatELy
3-cents TO ReCoveR the updated DWR revENuE Requirements.  

If You havE qUEsTIOns, PleAse contact Me, lynn VAN WageneN, Or kEITh
MELville. 

Excerpt Of SDG&E pleadINg: 

	ON AugusT 15, 2001, ADmiNIstratIve LaW JUDge (aLJ) Wetzell iSsueD an
"ADMINIsTRATIve LAW JUDge'S RULINg ON THE aUGuST 7, 2001 rEVEnuE rEqUIrEmeNT
of ThE DepARtMENT OF WaTeR rESOUrCES" DIRECtinG SaN DieGo Gas & electric
CompaNy (SdG&E) tO ProDuce uPdateD estImAtes, iNcludiNg supPoRting analyses,
of The sYstem averAge ElEctRiC rate INcreasEs rEquIred basEd on the REviSeD
REVeNue requirements detErMINeD by the DePartmeNT oF WATer ResouRcEs' (DwR),
as SET fortH in tHE AUgust 7, 2001 DWR CommunICaTiOn to the caLifornIa
pubLic utiliTIes COmmissIon.   

 -----OrigiNal MeSSage----- 
From:   Hay, JamES E.  
Sent:   Friday, AUGuST 17, 2001 9:00 aM 
tO:     MueLleR, Michelle; FoNg, Ed; sChavRien, lEe; melVIlle, KEith W. 
suBJeCT:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ weTzell's rulinG of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 

this email cONTAins the pLeadINg, ASsumptions, and a SummaRy.  The summaRY
is the acCuratE updated Version.  

 -----OrIGInal MessAge----- 
froM:   RuIz, ANNIe  
sent:   Friday, AugUST 17, 2001 8:31 AM 
TO:     aYk@cpuc.cA.goV; bfinkeLstEin@TurN.orG; bIshop@jrwoOd.com; BriLl,
thOmAs; Bsl@Cpuc.cA.Gov; chiefSkIp@aOl.Com; ChrisTIne.cosTa@sce.Com;
cJw5@PgE.Com; Cw
  under assumptions reques ted
by the  ALJ.    
Th anks  esp ecially to EdF ong,  Mohamed Derbas, BillSaxe,  M i ke S t ro ng, K eith
Me l vi l l e,an dJef fP ar rot f orkey ass istance in  ge tt ing this fil i ng  out in
on e-d ay. 

Basedonthis f il ing ,   the  Co mmiss ion ma y  (we h ave no Pr op o sed De c ision y e t )rule  as soon as Augus t  2 3  on an increas e to S DG & Er a tes  of  approxima te ly
3- c ents to re c o v ert he updated DW R revenue r e qui rement s.   If you  have  q u est ions, pleas e co ntact me,  LynnV an Wage n en, orKeithMel vil le.
E xc erp to f S D G& E p l ead ing: 

On  A ugust  15, 2 0 0 1, A dmi nist rativ e Law Judge ( ALJ ) We t zel l iss ued a n
"A DM INIST RATIVE  LAWJU DGE'S RULING ON  THE  AUGUST 7 , 2 00 1 R EV ENUER EQUIRE MEN T
O F THE D EPARTME N T O FW A T ER  RESOURCES" direct in g Sa n DiegoGas &E le ct r ic
Compa ny  (S DG&E ) to pr oduc e  u pdated e stimat e s,  i ncludin gsuppor ti ngana lyses , 
ofthe sy stem ave ragee lectric rate i n creases requi r ed b as e d on  th e revised
r even u e re quir e me nts deter mined  b y  t h e Department of Wat er  Resou rces'  (DWR),
as se t forth in t h e August  7,2 00 1  DWR communica tionto the Cal i fornia
P ublic  Utiliti es Commis s i on.   
 -- --- Ori gin a l  M essage----- F r om: Hay, Ja mes  E.  
S ent :  Fr ida y,  August 1 7, 20019: 00  A M
To :   Mueller,  M ich el le;  Fong ,  Ed; S chavr ien,  L ee ;  Me lville, Ke i t h W.  Su bjec t:     FW:R epl y of SD G&E to AL J W e tzel l' sRulingof August 15, 
2 001 in A.0 0- 10- 045/A. 0 1 -01-044

This email contains t h e plead ing , ass umpt ions, and  asummar y.The su mmaryis th eacc u r ate u p d at edve rsion.  
- --- -Orig in al M essage- ---- 
From:   Ruiz ,  An nie  
Sent:  Fr iday , Au gus t  1 7 , 2 00 1  8: 3 1  AM 
To:     ay k@cpuc.ca. go v ;bfinkelste i n@t ur n.org;bishop@ jrwoo d .com; B rill,
Tho mas; bsl@ cp uc.c a . gov ; chiefski p@aol.co m; christ i ne.co s ta @sce. com ;
cjw5 @p ge. com;cw
 _under assumptions_requested
by the ALJ. _ _

Thanks_especially to_Ed_Fong, Mohamed Derbas,_Bill Saxe, Mike_Strong, Keith
Melville, and Jeff_Parrot for key_assistance_in getting this filing out in
one-day. 

Based on this filing,  the Commission may_(we_have no_Proposed_Decision_yet)
rule as soon as August_23 on an increase to_SDG&E rates_of approximately
3-cents to recover the updated DWR revenue_requirements._ 

If you_have questions, please contact me, Lynn Van Wagenen, or_Keith
Melville. 

Excerpt of SDG&E pleading: 

	On_August 15, 2001,_Administrative_Law_Judge (ALJ) Wetzell issued_an
"ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ON THE_AUGUST 7, 2001 REVENUE REQUIREMENT
OF THE_DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES" directing San Diego_Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E) to produce_updated estimates, including supporting analyses,
of_the system_average electric rate increases required_based on the_revised
revenue requirements_determined by the_Department of Water Resources' (DWR),
as set_forth in the_August 7, 2001 DWR communication to_the_California
Public Utilities Commission.___

 -----Original_Message----- 
From: __Hay, James_E._ 
Sent:   Friday, August_17,_2001 9:00 AM 
To:   _ Mueller, Michelle; Fong,_Ed;_Schavrien, Lee; Melville, Keith_W. 
Subject:   _    FW: Reply_of SDG&E_to ALJ_Wetzell's Ruling of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 

This email contains the_pleading, assumptions, and a summary. _The summary
is the accurate_updated version.__

 -----Original Message-----_
From:_ _Ruiz, Annie  
Sent:   Friday,_August 17,_2001 8:31 AM 
To:  _  ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org;_bishop@jrwood.com;_Brill,
Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com;
cjw5@pge.com; cw