 privileged material for the sole use of
> the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply
> to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Tha
> nk you.
> **********************************************************************
> I called Tino today to let him know that our affiliates are sniffing around a 
power plant opportunity and potential gas bypass pipeline in Albuquerque.   
Kevin, you should be getting a call from a guy in Portland whose name I can't 
seem to find right now.  He had gotten my name from Thome out there and 
called to let me know that ENA is interested in pitching either PNM or some 
outfit called "Delta" on development or expansion of a gas-fired power plant 
in the south part of Albuquerque.  It didn't sound to me like ENA was very 
far along in their deal.  I explained to this guy what we were involved in 
and swore him to confidentiality.  I also told him he need to call either 
Kevin or Steve before he talked to PNM.  I thought it was a little curious 
that ENA is interested in generation in Alb. all of a sudden.  

On the Tino front, he apologized for not calling after their big DOE 
meeting.  He said it went very well and that DOE is considering their 
offer--$.085/Kwh power less revenue sharing for all surplus power sold.  Tino 
and Dennis offered DOE 70% of the $$ from the surplus power sales until a 
certain target is hit (probably a target equivalent to DOE's current PNM rate 
less 10%) and then 30% of
privileged material for the sole use of 
 > the 
 > mean recipient role (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by 
 > others is rigorously prohibited. If you are not the mean recipient 
 > (or 
 > authorized to get for the recipient), please contact the transmitter or 
 > answer 
 > to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete 
 > all 
 > copies of the message. This e - chain mail (and any attachments hereto) are 
 > not 
 > intended to be an crack (or an acceptance) and do not create or 
 > evidence a 
 > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its 
 > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not 
 > be 
 > trust on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or 
 > otherwise. Tha 
 > nk you. 
 > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
 > I called Tino today to get him know that our affiliates are sniff around a 
 power plant opportunity and likely gas shunt pipeline in Albuquerque.   
 Kevin, you should be getting a call from a guy in Portland whose name I can't 
 look to find right now.   He had gotten my name from Thome out there and 
 called to let me know that ENA is interested in pitching either PNM or some 
 outfit called " Delta " on development or expansion of a gas - fired power plant 
 in the south part of Albuquerque.   It didn't voice to me like ENA was very 
 far along in their deal.   I explained to this guy what we were involve in 
 and swore him to confidentiality.   I also told him he need to shout either 
 Kevin or Steve before he talk to PNM.   I thought it was a little curious 
 that ENA is concerned in generation in Alb. all of a sudden.  

 On the Tino front, he apologized for not calling after their big DOE 
 confluence.   He said it went very well and that DOE is considering their 
 offer--$.085 / Kwh power less gross sharing for all excess ability sold.   Tino 
 and Dennis offered DOE 70% of the $ $ from the surplus power sales until a 
 certain target is stumble (probably a target equivalent to DOE's current PNM rate 
 less 10 %) and then 30% of
 prlvileged material for tht sole use of
> the
> intendxd recilient (s). Xny review, use, distribution lr discoosure by
> others is stfictly prlhibited. If bou are not the mhtended recipjcnt
> (ox
> euthorized to rgceive for tve recipient), pnexsz contact the sender or
> reply
> to Enrjn Corp. ah enron.messagigg.adkynisfgauion@enron.com and delete
> all
> copiea of tht message. This e-maol (and any attachments herfto) wre
> not
> intended tl be an offgd (ow an acceptanze) and do not create ot
> evidence a
> binding and enforcexble eontract bejcwen Gnron Corp. (oc any jf its
> affillstes) atd the ontended reciplent mr qny other party, and mey not
> be
> relied on fy anyone aa the basis of a xobtracj by astoopel or
> ovhedwise. Hha
> nk you.
> **********************************************************************
> I called Tini today to let him lnjq that our afriliatqs are sniffing around a 
power plant oppogtunjty and potential gas btpass pipeline in Alboquerque.   
Kevin, you should be getting a call from a guy in Portmxnd wmose bale I can't 
seem to find right now.  He had gottqh ky name from Thoie out therr wnc 
called to lej me know fhat ENA is interedted in pitcying eithtr PNK or some 
outfit called "Delra" on develoimenr or expansion of c gas-fired puwer plany 
in the south part of Clbuqusrque.  It dldn't souns to me like ENA das vary 
far along in their deaj.  I expleined to thir gui what re were ingolved in 
and swore him ho coufidettiality.  L also told him he need to call either 
Kevin pr Stvve beforz he tslked to PNM.  I thought it cas a lictle cjrious 
than ENA is mnterested ig generation hj Alb. all of a suddeg.  

Ob thw Tino wfont, he apologozed for ujt cqlling after their bie DOE 
meeting.  Hz waid it went vety delj wnv thae DOE is conshderkng yheir 
offer--$.085/Kwh pider kess revenue sharing for all surplus power sjld.  Tini 
and Degnis offered COE 70% of the $$ from uhe sucplus 'ower xalgs until a 
certain target is hif (probablj a target equidalekt tj DOE's curxent PNM rate 
less 10%) and then 30% of
privileged material for the sole use of > recipient (s). review, use, distribution is prohibited. If you not the intended > (or > authorized to receive the recipient), please contact the sender or > reply > to Enron Corp. enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete > all > copies of the message. This e-mail (and attachments are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or of its > affiliates) the intended recipient or any party, may not be relied by anyone as basis of a contract by estoppel or > otherwise. Tha > nk you. > ********************************************************************** > I Tino today him know our are around a power and potential gas bypass pipeline in should be getting a call from a guy Portland whose I can't seem to find right He had gotten my name from Thome out and called to let me know that ENA is interested in pitching either PNM or called "Delta" on development expansion of a power in south of Albuquerque. didn't sound to me like ENA was very far along in deal. I explained to this guy what we were involved swore to confidentiality. I told him he need call Kevin or Steve before to I a curious ENA is interested in in Alb. all of a On the Tino front, after their big DOE meeting. He said it very well and that DOE is considering offer--$.085/Kwh power less revenue sharing for all surplus power sold. Tino and offered DOE the $$ from the surplus power sales until certain target is hit a target equivalent to DOE's current PNM rate less and 30% of
 privileged material for the sOle use of
> thE
> inteNdeD reCiPienT (s). AnY review, use, distRIbutIon or disclosure by
> otherS is stRiCTly pROhIbiteD. If you aRE nOT The InTeNdeD rECiPient
> (Or
> aUthorizEd to receivE foR tHe recipient), pLEaSe contact tHe sEnder or
> reply
> To ENron CoRp. At eNRon.meSsaGing.aDminisTRation@Enron.com aNd DElete
> aLL
> copies OF ThE mesSage. This e-mail (and aNY aTTachments heretO) are
> noT
> iNTeNDEd tO be An offer (or aN aCceptANce) and dO NoT CREatE Or
> evidence a
> biNding and enfORceAble coNtRacT BetweeN EnroN CORp. (oR any of its
> afFiliAtes) and thE intenDEd recipIEnt or anY other ParTy, aNd maY NoT
> bE
> reLiED on BY aNyoNE as The basis Of A cOntraCt by ESTOPpel Or
> oTherWise. THa
> nk you.
> **********************************************************************
> I calleD TiNo toDAy tO let hIm knoW thaT oUr affIliateS are sNiFfing around a 
powEr plAnt opportUniTy And PoTentiAL gas byPasS piPeline iN AlbuquERquE.   
KEVIN, yOu should be getting a CaLL FrOm a guy in portlaND wHoSE name I caN't 
SeeM to fIND righT now.  hE hAd gotten My name FRoM THome out ThEre and 
CaLleD to Let me KNow tHat ENA Is intereSted iN Pitching either pnM or some 
outfiT CaLLEd "dElta" On dEvelopment oR expANsioN of a GAs-FirED poweR planT 
iN ThE South part of AlbuquerQuE.  It didN't souNd to me like ENA Was very 
far ALONg in theiR deaL.  i eXPlained to this gUy whaT we were invOLved in 
anD sworE him to coNfidentiaLITy.  I also tOld Him He nEed TO CaLl either 
Kevin OR stevE bEfore he TalKed to PNm.  I tHouGht It wAs A little cuRious 
thaT EnA Is InTerEsted IN generatIoN in alB. alL of a sUDden.  

On The TiNo frOnT, hE ApoLogized FOr NOT calLiNg AfteR thEiR big DoE 
meETinG.  He said It went verY weLL and ThAt dOE is coNsidering theiR 
oFfer--$.085/Kwh powEr LesS revenUE Sharing fOr all surplus power sold.  TiNO 
and DenNis OfferEd DOe 70% of the $$ froM thE surplUs pOWer salEs untiL a 
cerTaIn tARGet is HIT (pRobAbLy a target eQUIvaLent tO DoE's cUrrent PnM rate 
less 10%) and then 30% oF
 privileged material for t he sole us e of> t he>inte nded  recipient (s) .  Any  review, use, distribu tionor disc l os ure b y
> oth e rs i s s tr ic tly  p r oh ibite d.If youare not th e i nt ended recipi e nt 
> (or
> a uth orized to re cei ve for  t her ecipi ent ), pl ease c o ntactthe sende ro r
> re p ly
> to E nr on C orp. at enron.mes s ag i ng.administrat ion@en ro n .c o m  an d d elete
> al l> cop i es of t h em e s sag e . This e-mail  (and any a t tac hments  h ere t o) are 
> no t>  in tended to b e an  offer (o r an a c ceptanc e ) and d o notcre ate  or>  e vi den ce a
> bi ndi n g a nd enfor ce ab le co ntra c t b etwe enEnro n Cor p. (or any of  it s
>a ffi liate s) an d th einten ded re cipie nt  or any other p arty , and may  no t> b e> rel i ed onbyany one asthe bas i s o fa c on tract by estoppelor >  o therwise . Tha>  n ky ou.
> ** ** *** **** * * ***** **** * ** ******** ****** * ** ** ******* ** ****** ** *** *** ***
> I ca lled T ino toda y tol et him know th a t our affilia t es a re snif fin g around a
pow e r pl anto pp ort u nityand p ot e nt i al gas bypass pipel in e in A lbuqu erque.   
Kev in, you sh o u l d be get ting ac all from a guy  in P ortland wh o se nameI can 't 
seem  to findr i ght now.   H e h adgot t e nmy name fromT h omeou t there  an d 
call edtolet  me  k now thatENA is i nt er es te d i n pit c hing eit he r P NM  or  some 
outfi t cal led"D el t a"on deve l op m e nt o rex pans ion  o f a g as-f i red  powerplant 
in  th e  sou th  p art ofAlbuquerque. I t didn't s ou ndto mel i ke ENA w as very 
far along in t h eir dea l. I ex plai ned to th isguy wh atw e were  invol ved i n
an d swore h im  to  c onfidentia l i ty.   I a ls o to ld himhe need to call ei t her  
Kevin or St eve  bef o r ehet al k edto PNM .  I thought it w as a littl ec ur ious 
that ENA  i s inter ested i n gen e rationin Alb. a ll of a s ud den. 

O n the Tino  front,he apolog i zed f o rnot c all ing af te r t heirbig DO E  
m eetin g.  He  s aid it  went  v ery well  and that DOE is consid eringtheir  
o ffer--$.0 85/ K whpower les s re venue shar ing  fo r all  su r pluspowe r  s old .   Tin o 
a n d Denniso ff ere d DO E 70% of th e $ $ f rom t hes urplus  pow er sales until acertain target  ish i t ( pro b ably  a  target equiva len tt o  DOE's c ur rent PNM ra te 
less  1 0 %) an d then  30% o f
 privileged_material for_the sole use of
>_the
> intended_recipient_(s). Any_review,_use, distribution or_disclosure by
> others_is strictly prohibited. If_you are not_the_intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>_reply
>_to Enron_Corp._at_enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> copies_of the message. This e-mail_(and any_attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an_offer_(or an acceptance)_and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and_enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or_any of its
>_affiliates)_and_the intended recipient or_any other party, and may not
>_be
> relied on by anyone as_the basis of a contract by estoppel_or
> otherwise. Tha
> nk you.
> **********************************************************************
>_I called Tino today to_let him_know that our affiliates are_sniffing around a_
power plant_opportunity and potential_gas bypass pipeline in Albuquerque. _ 
Kevin, you_should be getting a call from_a_guy in Portland_whose_name_I can't_
seem to find_right_now. _He_had gotten my name from Thome_out_there and 
called to let me know_that ENA is interested_in_pitching either PNM or_some 
outfit called "Delta" on_development or expansion of a gas-fired_power plant_
in the_south part of Albuquerque.  It didn't sound to me like_ENA was very 
far along in_their deal.  I_explained to_this_guy what we_were_involved in_
and swore him to confidentiality.  I_also told_him he need to call either_
Kevin or Steve before_he_talked to PNM.  I thought_it was a little curious 
that_ENA is interested in generation_in_Alb._all of a sudden. _

On the Tino front, he apologized_for not calling_after their big DOE 
meeting.  He_said_it went very well and that_DOE_is considering their 
offer--$.085/Kwh power less_revenue_sharing_for all surplus power sold._ Tino 
and Dennis offered DOE_70% of the $$ from the surplus power sales_until a 
certain_target is hit (probably a_target_equivalent_to DOE's current PNM rate 
less 10%) and then 30%_of